Loading...
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.
SDR2002-00006
SDR2002- 00006 JT ROTH OFFICE BUILDING nomiopmert, 3 2002-00006 ly,. CITY OF TIGARD ROut CE BUSING Community(Development Shaping Better Community 120 DAYS = 9/28/2002 SECTION I. APPLICATION SUMMARY FILE NAME: JT ROTH OFFICE BUILDING CASE NO.: Site Development Review (SDR) SDR2002-00006 PROPOSAL: The applicant is requesting Site Development Review for construction of a two-story, 7,634 square foot office building in the Tigard Triangle. The property is 17,866 square feet in size, and currently vacant. A portion of the property is surplus right-of-way that is being sold to the applicant. APPLICANT\ JT Roth Construction, Inc. OWNER: City of Tigard OWNER: 12600 SW 72nd, Suite 200 13125 SW Hall Blvd. Portland, OR 97223 Tigard, OR 97223 LOCATION: The property is located on the corner of 68th and Beveland and is described as, WCTM 2S101AA, Tax Lots 8300, 8500, 8600 and 8700. ZONE: MUE. Mixed Use Employment. The MUE zoning district is designed to apply to a majority of the land within the Tigard Triangle, a regional mixed-use employment district bounded by Pacific Highway (Hwy. 99), Highway 217 and 1-5. This zoning district permits a wide range of uses including major retail goods and services, business/professional offices, civic uses and housing; the latter includes multi-family housing at a maximum density of 25 units/acre, equivalent to the R-25 zoning district. A wide range of uses, including but not limited to community recreation facilities, religious institutions, medical centers, schools, utilities and transit-related park-and-ride lots, are permitted conditionally. APPLICABLE REVIEW CRITERIA: Community Development Code Chapters 18.360, 18.390, 18.520, 18.620, 18.705, 18.725, 18.745, 18.755, 18.765, 18.780, 18.790, 18.795 and 18.810. SECTION II. DECISION Notice is her �`.t et t e Ci ty of Ti$�rd C�mr �r Development Directors designee has APPROVED the •" rest subje1) ceitatkObliditions of approval. The findings and conclusionSOW/MbidirWededsiOn is tkiiedeatelietliasection VII. NOTICE OF TYPE II DECISION SDR2002-00006/JT ROTH OFFICE BUILDING PAGE 1 OF 25 CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL THE FOLLOWING CONDITIONS SHALL BE SATISFIED PRIOR TO THE ISSUANCE OF SITE/BUILDING PERMITS: Submit to the Engineering Department (Brian Rager, 639-4171, ext. 2471) for review and approval: 1. Prior to issuance of the site permit, the applicant shall submit a suite layout map to Shirley Treat, Engineering Department. If the applicant is not sure how many suites will be used, they must estimate a number. The City will then assign suite numbers and the address fee will then be calculated. The applicant prior to issuance of the site permit must pay the fee. (STAFF CONTACT: Shirley Treat, Engineering). 2. The applicant shall provide an on-site water quality facility as required by Clean Water Services Design and Construction Standards (adopted by Resolution and Order No. 00-7). Final plans and calculations shall be submitted to the Engineering Department (Brian Rager) for review and approval prior to issuance of the site permit. In addition, a proposed maintenance plan shall be submitted along with the plans and calculations for review and approval. 3. Prior to issuance of a building permit, the applicant shall obtain approval from the Tualatin Valley Water District for the proposed water connection. Submit to the Planning Division (Brad Kilby, 503-639-4171, ext. 2434) for review and approval: 4. Prior to any site work, the applicant shall submit a revised site plan that shows a walkway, a minimum of six feet in width from the buildings' entrance to SW 68th Avenue. 5. Prior to any site work, the applicant shall provide staff with a shared access agreement or crossover easement. Said document shall be recorded once reviewed by staff. 6. Prior to the issuance of building permits, the applicant shall submit revised building elevation and floor plan drawings that illustrates compliance with the weather protection standards for all building entrances, and the ground floor window standards. The applicant shall also demonstrate the type and size of the mechanical rooftop equipment. For equipment taller than 36 inches, it shall be setback from the roof edge 3 feet for each foot over 36 inches in height. 7. Prior to the issuance of building permits, the applicant shall submit a revised site plan that identifies the material and height of the trash enclosure. 8. Prior to the issuance of building permits, the applicant shall submit verification from the franchise waste hauler indicating that the location of the proposed trash enclosure meets their requirements. 9. Prior to the issuance of building permits, the applicant shall submit details addressing the design standards of the Mixed Solid Waste and Recyclable Storage in order for Staff to determine that this standard has been met. 10. Prior to the issuance of building permits, the applicant shall submit a revised parking plan that demonstrates compliance with TDC Chapter 18.765. The plan shall not permit more than 50% of the spaces to be compact. 11. The project shall reserve 5 percent of the proposed parking for carpool/vanpool parking as close to the buildings as practicable, with the exception of disabled parking. The spaces shall be clearly labeled. 12. The compact parking spaces shall be marked as "compact" or with a large "C". The access drive shall be marked with directional arrows. NOTICE OF TYPE II DECISION SDR2002-00006/JT ROTH OFFICE BUILDING PAGE 2 OF 25 • 13. Prior to the issuance of building permits, the applicant shall revise the parking plan to remove the parking space that is located within the vision clearance triangle. 14. Prior to constructing any signs, the applicant shall attain a sign permit from the City of Tigard. 15. Submit a detailed lighting plan for the exterior of the building. THE FOLLOWING CONDITIONS SHALL BE SATISFIED PRIOR TO A FINAL BUILDING INSPECTION: Submit to the Engineering Department (Brian Rager, 639-4171, ext. 2471) for review and approval: 16. Prior to final building inspection, the applicant_shall pay $512.00 to the City for the striping of the bike lane along the frontage of 68 Parkway. 17. To ensure compliance with Clean Water Services design and construction standards, the applicant shall employ the design engineer responsible for the design and specifications of the private water quality facility to perform construction and visual observation of the water quality facility for compliance with the design and specifications. These inspections shall be made at si9nificant stages, and at completion of the construction. Prior to final building inspection, the design engineer shall provide the City of Tigard (Inspection Supervisor) with written confirmation that the water quality facility is in compliance with the design and specifications. Staff Contact: Hap Watkins, Building Division. 18. Prior to a final building inspection, the applicant shall demonstrate that they have entered into a maintenance agreement with Stormwater Management, or another company that demonstrates they can meet the maintenance requirements of the manufacturer, for the proposed onsite storm water treatment facility. THIS APPROVAL SHALL BE VALID FOR EIGHTEEN (18) MONTHS FROM THE EFFECTIVE DATE OF THIS DECISION. SECTION III. BACKGROUND INFORMATION Site History: Staff conducted a search of City records for the subject property and found no other land use cases related to the property. Vicinity Information: The subject site is located on the corner of SW 68th Avenue and SW Beveland Street. The site is bordered on all sides by Mixed Use Employment (MUE) zoning. The subject site is surrounded by commercial office developments. Site Information and Proposal Description: The proposed site is composed of four different tax lots. The City of Tigard has ownership in tax lot 8600. The applicant has provided a purchase agreement, and the City Manager, Bill Monahan, has signed the application. The site is relatively flat and vacant. The surrounding properties are characterized by commercial office developments and located within the Mixed Use Employment zoning district. The applicant is proposing to construct a two-story, 7,634 square foot office building. The entire site is 17,866 square feet in size. SECTION IV. NEIGHBORHOOD COMMENTS The Tigard Community Development Code requires that property owners within 500 feet of the subject site be notified of the proposal, and be given an opportunity for written comments and/or oral testimony prior to a decision being made. In addition, the applicant is required to post the site with notice of the proposal. Staff has verified that the site is posted. Staff has not received any written or verbal comments from any neighbors about this application. NOTICE OF TYPE II DECISION SDR2002-00006/JT ROTH OFFICE BUILDING PAGE 3 OF 25 SECTION V. DECISION MAKING PROCEDURES, PERMITS AND USE USE CLASSIFICATION: SECTION 18.130.020 Lists the Use Categories. The applicant is seeking approval of a 7,634 square foot office building on a 17,866 square foot lot located within the Tigard Triangle. This use is classified in Code Chapter 18.130 (Use Classifications) as Office. The site is located within the MUE, Mixed Use Employment zoning district. Table 18.520.1 lists office uses as a permitted use in the MUE zone. SUMMARY LAND USE PERMITS: CHAPTER 18.310 Defines the decision-making type to which the land-use application is assigned. This is a Site Development Review, which is reviewed as a Type II-staff decision. DECISION MAKING PROCEDURES: CHAPTER 18.390 Describes the decision-making procedures. Type II procedures apply to quasi-judicial permits and actions that contain some discretionary criteria. Type II actions are decided by the Director with public notice and an opportunity for a hearing. If any party with standing appeals a Director's Type II decision, the appeal of such decision will be heard by the Hearings Officer; SECTION VI. SUMMARY OF APPLICABLE REVIEW CRITERIA The proposal's consistency with these Code Chapters is reviewed in the following sections: A. Zoning Districts 18.520 Commercial Zoning Districts B. Applicable Development Code Standards 18.620 Tigard Triangle Design Standards 18.705 Access Egress and Circulation 18.725 Environmental Performance Standards 18.745 Landscaping and Screening 18.755 Mixed Solid Waste and Recyclable Storage 18.765 Off-Street parking and loading requirements 18.780 Signs 18.790 Tree Removal 18.795 Visual Clearance C. Specific SDR Approval Criteria 18.360 D. Street and Utility Improvement Standards 18.810 E. Decision Makin Procedures 18.390 Impact-Study SECTION VII. APPLICABLE DEVELOPMENT CODE STANDARDS A. ZONIING DISTRICTS Commercial Zoning District: Section 18.520.020 Lists the description of the Commercial Zoning Districts. The site is located in the MUE: Mixed-Use Employment zoning district. The proposed use, general office space, is outright permitted in the zone. Development Standards: Section 18.520.040.B States that Development standards in commercial zoning districts are contained in Table 18.520.2 below: NOTICE OF TYPE II DECISION SDR2002-00006/JT ROTH OFFICE BUILDING PAGE 4 OF 25 TABLE 18.520.2 DEVELOPMENT STANDARDS IN COMMERCIAL ZONES STANDARD MUE PROPOSED Minimum Lot Size None 17,866 S.F. -Detached unit - -Boarding, lodging,rooming house Minimum Lot Width 50 ft 90 ft Minimum Setbacks -Front yard 0'min/10'max 2 ft -Side facing street on corner&through lots - -Side yard 0/20 ft[1] 2 ft/37.6 ft -Side or rear yard abutting more restrictive zoning district - -Rear yard 0/20 ft[1] 119.4 ft -Distance between front of garage&property line - - abutting a public or private street. Maximum Height 45 ft 30.4 ft Maximum Site Coverage[2] 85% 80.9% Maximum Floor Area Ratio 0.4 0.4 Minimum Landscape Requirement 15% 19.1% [1]no setback shall be required except 20 feet shall be required where the zone abuts a residential zone. [2]includes all buildings and impervious area As demonstrated in the table above, the applicant's plans comply with the dimensional standards of the MUE zone. FINDING: Based on the analysis above, the underlying zone's development criteria have been satisfied. B. APPLICABLE DEVELOPMENT CODE STANDARDS A. TRIANGLE DESIGN STANDARDS (18.620): Design standards for public street improvements and for new development and renovation projects have been prepared for the Tigard Triangle. These design standards address several important guiding principals adopted for the Tigard Triangle, including creating a high-quality mixed use employment area, providing a convenient pedestrian and bikeway system within the Triangle, and utilizing streetscape to create a high quality image for the area. All new developments are expected to contribute to the character and quality of the area. In addition to meeting the design standards described below and other development standards required by the Development and Building Codes, developments will be required to dedicate and improve,public streets, connect to public facilities such as sanitary sewer, water and storm drainage, and participate in funding future transportation and public improvement projects necessary within the Tigard Triangle. The following design standards apply to all development located within the Tigard Triangle. If a standard found in this section conflicts with another standard in the Development Code, standards in this section shall govern. Street Connectivity: All development must demonstrate how one (1) of the following standard options will be met. Variance of these standards may be approved per the requirements of Chapter 18.370 where topography, barriers such as railroads or freeways, or environmental constraints such as major streams and rivers prevent street extensions and connections. NOTICE OF TYPE II DECISION SDR2002-00006/JT ROTH OFFICE BUILDING PAGE 5 OF 25 Design Option: a. Local street spacing shall provide public street connections at intervals of no more than 660 feet; b. Bike and pedestrian connections on public easements or right-of-way shall be provided at intervals of no more than 330 feet. Performance Option: a. Local street spacing shall occur at intervals of no less than eight (8) street intersections per mile; b. The shortest vehicle trip over public streets from a local origin to a collector or greater facility is no more than twice the straight-line distance; c. The shortest pedestrian trip on public right-of-way from a local origin to a collector or greater facility is no more than one and one-half the straight-line distance. The proposal is located between SW 68th and SW 69th, and has frontage on SW Beveland. Beveland and SW 69 Streets are classified as neighborhood routes in the Transportation System Plan that was recently adopted by the Tigard City Council. SW 68th Avenue is a collector and adjacent to the proposed site. Therefore, the performance option has been met. Site Design Standards: All development must meet the following site design standards. If a parcel is one (1) acre or larger a phased development plan must be approved demonstrating how these standards for the overall parcel can be met. Variance to these standards may be granted if the criteria found in Section 18.370.010C2 (Criteria for Granting a Variance) is satisfied. At .41 acres, the subject site is less than an acre, and the applicant has not indicated that the project will be phased. Therefore, this criterion is inapplicable. Building Placement On Major And Minor Arterials And The Street: Buildings shall occupy a minimum of 50 percent of all street frontages along Major and Minor Arterial Streets. Buildings shall be located at public street intersections on Major and Minor Arterial Streets. SW 68th, SW 69th, and SW Beveland Streets are neither classified as a major nor minor arterial. Therefore, this criterion does not apply. Building Setback: The minimum building setback from public street rights-of-way or dedicated wetlands/buffers and other environmental features, shall be 0 feet; the maximum building setback shall be 10 feet. The proposed building is 2 feet from the current property line fronting SW Beveland Street, and SW 68th Avenue. This criterion is satisfied. Front Yard Setback Design: Landscaping, an arcade, or a hard-surfaced expansion of the pedestrian path must be provided between a structure and a public street or accessway. If a building abuts more than one (1) street, the required improvements shall be provided on all streets. Landscaping shall be developed to an L-1 standard on public streets. Hard-surfaced areas shall be constructed with scored concrete or modular paving materials. Benches and other street furnishings are encouraged. These areas shall contribute to the minimum landscaping requirement per Section 18.620.070. The landscape plan indicates that a combination of landscaping and a concrete walk will be located between the building and the public streets. Landscaping and walkways will be discussed further in this decision under Chapter 18.745 (Landscaping & Screening). NOTICE OF TYPE II DECISION SDR2002-00006/JT ROTH OFFICE BUILDING PAGE 6 OF 25 • Walkway Connection To Building Entrances: A walkway connection is required between the building's entrance and the public street or accessway providing access to the property. This walkway must be at least six (6) feet wide and be paved with scored concrete or modular paving materials. Building entrances at a corner near a public street intersection are encouraged. These areas shall contribute to the minimum landscaping requirement per Section 18.620.070. The applicant's plans show an entrance along SW 68th Avenue, the street providing access to the site, and the sidewalk between the building and the street is at least 6 feet wide, but the sidewalk leading to the entrance is only 4 feet wide. This criterion is not fully met. FINDING: The applicant's plans do not provide a sufficient walkway connection. Parking Location And Landscape Design: Parking for buildings or phases adjacent to public street rights-of-way must be located to the side or rear of newly constructed buildings. If located on the side, parking is limited to 50% of the street frontage and must be behind a landscaped area constructed to an L-1 Landscape Standard. The minimum depth of the L-1 landscaped area is five feet or the building setback, whichever is greater. Interior side and rear yards shall be landscaped to an L-2 Landscape Standard, except where a side yard abuts a public street, where it shall be landscaped to an L-1 Landscape Standard. The proposed site has frontage on three streets, and the building has more than 50% of frontage on SW 68th which as discussed previously is a collector. The proposed parking area is located to the rear of the structure, but on the corner of SW Beveland and SW 69th Avenue. The parking lot is bordered on both frontages by an L-1 type landscape. This criterion is satisfied. Building Design Standards: All non-residential buildings shall comply with the following design standards. Variance to these standards may be granted if the criteria found in Section 18.370.010 (Criteria for Granting a Variance) is satisfied. Ground Floor Windows: All street-facing elevations within the Building Setback (0 to 10 feet) along public streets shall include a minimum of 50 percent of the ground floor wall area with windows, display areas or doorway openings. The ground floor wall area shall be measured from three (3) feet above grade to nine (9) feet above grade the entire width of the street-facing elevation. The ground floor window requirement shall be met within the ground floor wall area and for glass doorway openings to ground level. Up to 50 percent of the ground floor window requirement may be met on an adjoining elevation as long as all of the requirement is located at a building corner. According to the standard above, the building must have at a minimum of 50 percent of the ground floor wall area as windows. The east elevation (facing SW 68') of the building is 54 feet long, for a total calculated wall area of 324 square feet. Fifty percent of the wall area is 162 square feet. The elevations show 108 square feet of windows, and 45 square feet of glass doorway for a total of 153 square feet. The south elevation (facing SW Beveland) of the building in is 107 feet long, so, the wall area calculated is 642 square feet, and fifty percent of that wall area would constitute 321 square feet. The elevations show 264.6 square feet of windows, and 60 square feet of glass doorway for a total of 324.6 square feet. The combined ground floor wall area considered in this calculation is 966 square feet. Fifty percent of that area would be 483 square feet. However, the applicant has only included a total of 372.6 square feet of window space, and 105 square feet of glass doorways for a total of 477.6 square feet. This falls short of the minimum required, therefore this standard is not met. FINDING: The proposal fails to provide a minimum of 50 percent of the ground floor wall area with windows, display areas, or doorway openings. NOTICE OF TYPE II DECISION SDR2002-00006/JT ROTH OFFICE BUILDING PAGE 7 OF 25 Building Facades: Facades that face a public street shall extend no more than 50 feet without providing at least one (1) of the following features: (a) a variation in building materials; (b) a building off-set of at least 1-foot; (c) a wall area that is entirely separated from other wall areas by a projection, such as an arcade; or (d) by another design features that reflect the building's structural system. No building facade shall extend for more than 300 feet without a pedestrian connection between or through the building. The building has offsets that are projected a minimum of 1 foot from the roofline. The design also includes a variation of two different styles of brick. This criterion is satisfied. Weather Protection: Weather protection for pedestrians, such as awnings, canopies, and arcades, shall be provided at building entrances. Weather protection is encouraged along building frontages abutting a public sidewalk or a hard-surfaced expansion of a sidewalk, and along building frontages between a building entrance and a public street or accessway. Awnings and canopies shall not be backlit. The plans show 2 entrances into the building. The applicant states in the narrative that the main entrance is protected with a two-foot façade to provide the necessary weather protection. However, the standard requires that all entrances into the builging are provided with weather protection, and it does not appear that the entrance on SW 68 is protected. This criterion is not satisfied. FINDING: All of the buildings entrances are not provided with weather protection as required by the Tigard Triangle Design Standards. Building Materials: Plain concrete block, plain concrete, corrugated metal, plywood, sheet pressboard or vinyl siding may not be used as exterior finish materials. Foundation material may be plain concrete or plain concrete block where the foundation material is not revealed for more than 2 feet. The building will be constructed of brick. The proposed building materials meet this standard. Roofs And Roof Lines: Except in the case of a building entrance feature, roofs shall be designed as an extension of the primary materials used for the building and should respect the building's structural system and architectural style. False fronts and false roofs are not permitted. The proposed building does not have a false front or false roof. The applicant is proposing a flat roof system with a parapet to conceal mechanical equipment. The parapets are a continuation of the front façade. This criterion is satisfied. Roof-Mounted Equipment: All roof-mounted equipment must be screened from view from adjacent public streets. Satellite dishes and other communication equipment must be set back or positioned on a roof so that exposure from adjacent public streets is minimized. Solar heating panels are exempt from this standard. The applicant has indicated that roof-mounted equipment will be screened according to City standards. The applicant states that mechanical equipment will be screened behind a parapet wall. However, since it is not specified what type and how tall the equipment is to be located on the roof, it is impossible to determine whether the applicant's proposal will adequately screen the equipment. To ensure that mechanical equipment is screened, it shall be setback from the roof edge three feet for each foot over 36 inches in height. Signs: In addition to the requirements of Chapter 18.780 of the Development Code, the following standards shall be met: NOTICE OF TYPE II DECISION SDR2002-00006/JT ROTH OFFICE BUILDING PAGE 8 OF 25 Zoning District Regulations: Non-residential development within the MUE zone shall meet the sign requirements of the C-P zone (18.780.130.D). Sign Area Limits: The maximum sign area limits found in Section 18.780.130 shall not be exceeded. No area limit increases will be permitted within the Tigard Triangle. Height Limits: The maximum height limit for all signs except wall signs shall be 10 feet. Wall signs shall not extend above the roofline of the wall on which the sign is located. No height increases will be permitted within the Tigard Triangle. Sign Location: Freestanding signs within the Tigard Triangle shall not be permitted within required L-1 landscape areas. The applicant has provided details for a sign and identified a location for the sign, however, the sign was not included as part of this application, and the proposed location is within a clear vision triangle. This standard is not applicable at this time. Landscaping and Screening: Two (2) levels of landscaping and screening standards are applicable to the Tigard Triangle. The locations where the landscaping or screening is required and the depth of the landscaping or screening are defined in other sub-sections of this section. These standards are minimum requirements. Higher standards may be substituted as long as all height limitations are met. L-1 (Low Screen): For general landscaping of landscaped and screened areas within parking lots, local collectors and local streets, planting standards of Chapter 18.745 Landscaping and Screening, shall apply. The L-1 standard applies to setbacks on major and minor arterials. Where the setback is a minimum of 5 feet between the parking lot and a major or minor arterial, trees shall be planted at 31/2-inch caliper, at a maximum of 28 feet on center. Shrubs shall be of a variety that will provide a 3-foot high screen and a 90 percent opacity within one (1) year. Groundcover plants must fully cover the remainder of landscape area within two (2) years. Any tree planted in excess of a 2-inch caliper shall be eligible for full mitigation credit. The proposal does not abut a major or minor arterial, therefore, the L-1 standards do not apply. L-2 (General Landscaping): For general landscaping of landscaped and screened areas within parking lots, local collectors and local streets, planting standards of Chapter 18.745 Landscaping and Screening, shall apply. Trees shall be provided at a minimum 21/2-inch caliper, at a maximum spacing of 28 feet. Shrubs shall be of a size and quality to achieve the required landscaping or screening effect within two (2) years. Any tree planted in excess of a 2-inch caliper shall be eligible for full mitigation credit. Because the site is on a neighborhood route, a local street, and a collector, the L-2 landscape standards defer to Chapter 18.745. Compliance with Landscaping and Screening standards are discussed further in this decision under Chapter 18.745 (Landscaping & Screening). FINDING: Based on the analysis above, the Tigard Triangle Design standards have not been fully met. If the applicant complies with the conditions listed below, the standards will be met. CONDITIONS: Prior to any site work, the applicant shall submit a revised site plan that shows a walkway, a minimum of six feet in width from the buildings' entrance to SW 68th Avenue. NOTICE OF TYPE II DECISION SDR2002-00006/JT ROTH OFFICE BUILDING PAGE 9 OF 25 Prior to the issuance of building permits, the applicant shall submit revised building elevation and floor plan drawings that illustrate compliance with the weather protection standards for all building entrances, and the ground floor window standards. The applicant shall also demonstrate the type and size of the mechanical rooftop equipment. For equipment taller than 36 inches, it shall be setback from the roof edge 3 feet for each foot over 36 inches in height. Prior to constructing any signs, the applicant shall attain a sign permit from the City of Tigard. B. ADDITIONAL APPLICABLE DEVELOPMENT CODE STANDARDS The Site development Review approval standards require that a development proposal be found to be consistent with the various standards of the Community Development Code. The applicable criteria in this case are Chapters 18.360 18.390, 18.520, 18.705, 18.745, 18.755, 18.765, 18.775, 18.780, 18.790, 18.795, and 18.810. The proposal's consistency with these Code Chapters is reviewed in the following sections. Access, Egress and Circulation (18.705): Walkways: On-site pedestrian walkways shall comply with the following standards: Walkways shall extend from the ground floor entrances or from the ground floor landing of stairs, ramps, or elevators of all commercial, institutional, and industrial uses, to the streets which provide the required access and egress. Walkways shall provide convenient connections between buildings in multi-building commercial, institutional, and industrial complexes. Unless impractical walkways shall be constructed between new and existing developments and neighboring developments; On site pedestrian walkways are present between the building entrances and the street that provides access and egress. A connection to the adjoining development to the north is Impractical as that development has placed a row of parking spaces along the common property line, however, walkways are connecting the developments within the right-of-way. This standard is satisfied. Wherever required walkways cross vehicle access driveways or parking lots, such crossings shall be designed and located for pedestrian safety . Required walkways shall be physically separated from motor vehicle traffic and parking by either a minimum 6-inch vertical separation (curbed) or a minimum 3-foot horizontal separation, except that pedestrian crossings of traffic aisles are permitted for distances no greater than 36 feet if appropriate landscaping, pavement markings, or contrasting pavement materials are used. Walkways shall be a minimum of four feet in width, exclusive of vehicle overhangs and obstructions such as mailboxes, benches, bicycle racks, and sign posts, and shall be in compliance with ADA standards; No walkways have been proposed to cross the access drive or parking lot. This standard is inapplicable. Required walkways shall be paved with hard surfaced materials such as concrete, asphalt, stone, brick, etc. Walkways may be required to be lighted and/or signed as needed for safety purposes. Soft-surfaced public use pathways may be provided only if such pathways are provided in addition to required pathways. The plan depicts concrete sidewalks, which meets the standard. Minimum Access Requirements for Commercial and Industrial Use: Section 18.705.030.1 rovides the minimum access requirements for commercial and industrial uses: Table 18.705.3 indicates that the required access width for developments with 0-99 parking spaces is one 30-foot accesses with 24 feet of pavement. Vehicular access shall be provided to commercial or industrial uses, and shall be located to within 50 feet of the primary ground floor entrances; additional requirements for truck traffic may be placed as conditions of site development review. NOTICE OF TYPE II DECISION SDR2002-00006/JT ROTH OFFICE BUILDING PAGE 10 OF 25 The development is proposing to share access off of SW 68th with the property directly to the north. That access is 30 feet wide with 24 feet of pavement. Therefore, this standard is met. FINDING: The applicant is proposing to share access with the property owner to the north of the site, however, there was no agreement provided. CONDITION:Prior to any site work, the applicant shall provide staff with a shared access agreement or crossover easement. Said document shall be recorded once reviewed by staff. Landscaping and Screening (18/45): Street Trees: Section 18.745.040 states that all development projects fronting on a public street or a private drive more than 100 feet in length shall be required to plant street trees in accordance with Section 18.745.040.0 Section 18.745.040.0 requires that street trees be spaced between 20 and 40 feet apart depending on the size classification of the tree at maturity (small, medium or large). The subject site was provided with street trees along the frontage of SW Beveland, and SW 69th Avenue with previous street construction. The property does not have 100 feet of frontage along SW 68th Avenue therefore, the applicant is not required to plant street trees along this frontage. This criterion is satisfied. Buffering and Screening: Section 8/45.080 states that no buffer is required between abutting uses that are of a different type when the uses are separated by a street. No buffer is required between a proposed office use and existing office use. Buffering and/or screening are required for dissimilar uses. All properties surrounding subject property are zoned MUE, and developed as commercial office space. According to Table 18.745.1 of the Tigard Development Code, no bufferinc is required except where the parking lot fronts a public street. This buffering is discussed in fie following section. Screening: Special Provisions: Section 18.745.050.E requires the screening of parking and loading areas. Landscaped parking areas shall include special design features which effectively screen the parking lot areas from view. Planting materials to be installed should achieve a relative balance between low lying and vertical shrubbery and trees. Trees shall be planted in landscaped islands in all parking areas, and shall be equally distributed on the basis of one (1) tree for each seven (7) parking spaces in order to provide a canopy effect. The minimum dimension on the landscape islands shall be three (3) feet wide and the landscaping shall be protected from vehicular damage by some form of wheel guard or curb. The parking that is visible from SW Beveland Street and SW 69th Avenue is proposed to have a buffer equal to the L-1 landscaping standard of the Tigard Triangle Design standards. The applicant is proposing landscaped islands containing one tree for every seven spaces with low- lying ground cover and shrubs. The proposed Chanticleer Pear trees are identified as an appropriate tree for this use. Therefore, this criterion is satisfied. Screening Of Service Facilities. Except for one-family and two-family dwellings, any refuse container or disposal area and service facilities such as gas meters and air conditioners which would otherwise be visible from a public street, customer or resident parking area, any public facility or any residential area shall be screened from view by placement of a solid wood fence or masonry wall between five and eight feet in height. All refuse materials shall be contained within the screened area; NOTICE OF TYPE II DECISION SDR2002-00006/JT ROTH OFFICE BUILDING PAGE 11 OF 25 The site plan submitted shows a trash enclosure but does not clearly indicate what type and how tall the enclosure will be. A solid wood fence or masonry wall between five and eight feet in height is required. The applicant's revised plan will need to identify the material and height of the enclosure(s). Screening Of Refuse Containers. Except for one- and two-family dwellings, any refuse container or refuse collection area which would be visible from a public street, parking lot, residential or commercial area, or any public facility such as a school or park shall be screened or enclosed from view by placement of a solid wood fence, masonry wall or evergreen hedge. All refuse shall be contained within the screened area. The applicant's plans show a trash enclosure in a location within the parking lot that is acceptable. The applicant has also indicated that the perimeter of the enclosure would be landscaped, however, the applicant has failed to address the type of fencing that would be used to enclose the enclosure. This criterion is not satisfied. FINDING: Based on the analysis above, the landscaping and screening standards have not been fully met. If the applicant complies with the condition listed below, the standards will be met. CONDITION: Prior to the issuance of building permits, the applicant shall submit a revised site plan that identifies the material and height of the trash enclosure. Mixed Solid Waste and Recyclables Storage (18.755): Chapter 18.755 requires that new construction incorporates functional and adequate space for on-site storage and efficient collection of mixed solid waste and source separated Recyclables prior to pick-up and removal by haulers. The applicant must choose one (1) of the following four (4) methods to demonstrate compliance: Minimum Standard, Waste Assessment, Comprehensive Recycling Plan, or Franchised Hauler Review and Sign-Off. The applicant will have to submit evidence or a plan which indicates compliance with this section. Regardless of which method chosen, the applicant will have to submit a written sign-off from the franchise hauler regarding the facility location and compatibility. The applicant has not addressed Chapter 18.755. Therefore, Staff cannot determine which of the 4 methods will be used to demonstrate compliance. Location Standards. To encourage its use, the storage area for source-separated recyclable shall be co- located with the storage area for residual mixed solid waste; Indoor and outdoor storage areas shall comply with Uniform Building and Fire Code requirements; Storage area space requirements can be satisfied with a single location or multiple locations, and can combine both interior and exterior locations; Exterior storage areas can be located within interior side yard or rear yard areas. Exterior storage areas shall not be located within a required front yard setback or in a yard adjacent to a public or private street; Exterior storage areas shall be located in central and visible locations on a site to enhance security for users; Exterior storage areas can be located in a parking area, if the proposed use provides at least the minimum number of parking spaces required for the use after deducting the area used for storage. Storage areas shall be appropriately screened according to the provisions in 18.755.050 C, design standards; The storage area shall be accessible for collection vehicles and located so that the storage area will not obstruct pedestrian or vehicle traffic movement on the site or on public streets adjacent to the site. The refuse container is accessed from the parking lot and is visible in order to enhance security for users. The proposed refuse container will not occupy any required parking stalls and screening has been conditioned to conform to Tigard standards previously in this decision. NOTICE OF TYPE II DECISION SDR2002-00006/JT ROTH OFFICE BUILDING PAGE 12 OF 25 Design Standards. The dimensions of the storage area shall accommodate containers consistent with current methods of local collection; Storage containers shall meet Uniform Fire Code standards and be made and covered with waterproof materials or situated in a covered area; Exterior storage areas shall be enclosed by a sight-obscuring fence wall, or hedge at least six feet in height. Gate openings which allow access to users and haulers shall be provided. Gate openings for haulers shall be a minimum of 10 feet wide and shall be capable of being secured in a closed and open position; Storage area(s) and containers shall be clearly labeled to indicate the type of materials accepted. The applicant has not submitted a detail of the trash enclosure or refuse container. FINDING: Because the applicant has not provided evidence of compliance with the Mixed Solid Waste and Recyclables Storage design standards, this standard has not been met. If the applicant complies with the conditions listed below, the standards will be met. CONDITIONS: Prior to the issuance of building permits, the applicant shall submit verification from the franchise waste hauler indicating that the location of the proposed trash enclosure meets their requirements. • Prior to the issuance of building ermits, the applicant shall submit details addressing the design standards of the Mixed Solid Waste and Recyclable Storage in order for Staff to determine that this standard has been met. Off-Street Parking and Loading (18.765): Location of vehicle parking: Off-street arking spaces for single-family and duplex dwellings and single-family attached dwellings shall be located on the same lot with the dwellings. Off-street parking lots for uses not listed above shall be located not further than 200 feet from the building or use that they are required to serve, measured in a straight line from the building with the following exceptions: a) commercial and industrial uses which require more than 40 parking spaces may provide for the spaces in excess of the required first 40 spaces up to a distance of 300 feet from the primary site; The 40 parking spaces which remain on the primary site must be available for users in the following order of priority: 1) Disabled-accessible spaces; 2) Short-term spaces; 3) Long-term preferential carpool and vanpool spaces; 4) Long-term spaces. The parking lot associated with this project at the furthest point away from any proposed building entrance is 106 feet. This criterion is satisfied. Joint Parking: Owners of two or more uses, structures or parcels of land may agree to utilize jointly the same parking and loading spaces when the peak hours of operation do not overlay, subject to the following: ¶) The size of the joint parking facility shall be at least as large as the number of vehicle parking spaces required by the Iarger(est) use per Section 18.765.070; 2) Satisfactory legal evidence shall be presented to the Director in the form of deeds, leases or contracts to establish the joint use; 3) If a joint use arrangement is subsequently terminated, or if the uses change, the requirements of this title thereafter apply to each separately. Joint parking is not proposed with this application. This criterion is in applicable. Parking in Mixed-Use Projects: In mixed-use projects, the required minimum vehicle parking shall be determined using the following formula. 1) Primary use, i.e. that with the largest proportion of total floor area within the development at 100d10 of the minimum vehicle parking required for that use in Section 18.765.060; 2) Secondary use, i.e., that with the second largest percentage of total floor area within the development, at 90% of the vehicle parking required-for that use in Section 18.765.060. 3) Subsequent use or uses, at 80% of the vehicle parking required for that use(s) in Section 18.765.060; 4) The maximum parking allowance shall be 150% of the total minimum parking as calculated in D.1.-3. above. NOTICE OF TYPE II DECISION SDR2002-00006/JT ROTH OFFICE BUILDING PAGE 13 OF 25 This proposal is not considered a mixed-use project as it will contain solely office space. This criterion is inapplicable. Visitor Parking in Multi-Family Residential Developments: Multi-dwelling units with more than 10 required parking spaces shall provide an additional 15% of vehicle parking spaces above the minimum required for the use of guests of residents of the complex. These spaces shall be centrally located or distributed throughout the development. Required bicycle parking facilities shall also be centrally located within or evenly distributed throughout the development. This project does not involve a residential use. Therefore, this standard does not apply. Preferential Long-Term CarpoolNanpool Parking: Parking lots providing in excess of 20 )ono-term parking spaces shall provide preferential long-term carpool and vanpool parking for employees, students and other regular visitors to the site. At least 5% of total long-term parking spaces shall be reserved for carpool/vanpool use. Preferential parking for carpools/vanpools shall be closer to the main entrances of the building than any other employee or student parking except parking spaces designated for use by the disabled. Preferential carpool/vanpool spaces shall be full-sized per requirements in Section 18.765.040N and shall be clearly designated for use only by carpools and vanpools between 7:00 AM and 5:30 PM Monday through Friday. The proposed parking lot contains a total of 24 parking spaces. Therefore, the applicant will be required to reserve 5 percent (1 space) of the proposed parking for carpool/vanpool parking. Disabled-Accessible Parking: All parking areas shall be provided with the required number of parking spaces for disabled persons as specified by the State of Oregon Uniform Building Code and federal standards. Such parking spaces shall be sized, signed and marked as required by these regulations. The applicant is providing 24 parking spaces, therefore, one (1) van accessible (9 feet wide with an 8-foot aisle) ADA handicap space is required. The applicant's plans show an ADA space that will be 10 feet wide with an 10-foot aisle. Therefore, this standard has been met. Access Drives: With regard to access to public streets from off-street parking: access drives from the street to off-street parking or loading areas shall be designed and constructed to facilitate the flow of traffic and provide maximum safety for pedestrian and vehicular traffic on the site; the number and size of access drives shall be in accordance with the requirements of Chapter, 18.705, Access, Egress and Circulation; access drives shall be clearly and permanently marked and defined through use of rails, fences, walls or other barriers or markers on frontage not occupied by service drives; access drives shall have a minimum vision clearance in accordance with Chapter 18.795, Visual Clearance; access drives shall be improved with an asphalt or concrete surface; and excluding single-family and duplex residences, except as provided by Subsection 18.810.030.P, groups of two or more parking spaces shall be served by a service drive so that no backing movements or other maneuvering within a street or other public right-of-way will be required. The access drive has been addressed previously in this decision. Pedestrian Access: Pedestrian access through parking lots shall be provided in accordance with Section 18.705.030.F. Where a parking area or other vehicle area has a drop-off grade separation, the property owner shall install a wall, railing, or other barrier which will prevent a slow-moving vehicle or driverless vehicle from escaping such area and which will prevent pedestrians from walking over drop-off edges. Pedestrian access has been discussed previously in this decision and there are no drop off edges that require barriers. NOTICE OF TYPE II DECISION SDR2002-00006/JT ROTH OFFICE BUILDING PAGE 14 OF 25 • Parking Lot Striping: Except for single-family and duplex residences, any area intended to be used to meet the off-street parking requirements as contained in this Chapter shall have all parking spaces clearly marked; and all interior drives and access aisles shall be clearly marked and signed to show direction of flow and maintain vehicular and pedestrian safety. The plans submitted show the parking spaces will be clearly marked with striping. The compact spaces will need to be marked as will the interior drive. The interior drive needs arrows showing direction of vehicular traffic. Wheel Stops: Parking spaces along the boundaries of a parking lot or adjacent to interior landscaped areas or sidewalks shall be provided with a wheel stop at least four inches high located three feet back from the front of the parking stall. The front three feet of the parking stall may be concrete, asphalt or low lying landscape material that does not exceed the height of the wheel stop. This area cannot be calculated to meet landscaping or sidewalk requirements. The applicant is providing wheel stops and curbs on all of the parking stalls, however, the location of the wheel stops is not three feet back from the front of the stalls as required. This criterion is not satisfied. Space and Aisle Dimensions: Section 18.765.040.N states that: "except as modified for angled parking in Figures 18.765.1 and 18.765.2 the minimum dimensions for parking spaces are: 8.5 feet x 18.5 feet for a standard space and 7.5 feet x 16.5 feet for a compact space"; aisles accommodating two direction traffic, or allowing access from both ends, shall be 24 feet in width. No more than 50% of the required spaces may be compact spaces. The applicant's plans indicate that the standard parking spaces will be 10-12 feet wide, 18.6 feet deep, and 9.1-10.4 feet wide feet by 16.6 feet for compact spaces. The access aisle will be 24 feet wide. The applicants proposal requires a minimum of 20 spaces and a maximum of 25 spaces. The applicant indicates that there will be 14 standard spaces, 1 van accessible space, and 10 compact spaces, however, the site plan indicates 15 compact spaces, 9 standard spaces, and 1 van accessible space. Two of the standard spaces fail to meet the depth requirement for a standard space, and the applicant is illustrating that more than 50% of the spaces are compact. This standard is not satisfied. Bicycle Parking Location and Access: Section 18.765.050 states bicycle parking areas shall be provided at locations within 50 feet of primary entrances to structures; bicycle parking areas shall not be located within parking aisles, landscape areas or pedestrian ways; outdoor bicycle parking shall be visible from on-site buildings and/or the street. When the bicycle parking area is not visible from the street, directional signs shall be used to located the parking area; and bicycle parking may be located inside a building on a floor which has an outdoor entrance open for use and floor location which does not require the bicyclist to use stairs to gain access to the space. Exceptions may be made to the latter requirement for parking on upper stories within a multi-story residential building. The site plan indicates 3-bicycle parking spaces. According to Table 18.765.2 of the Tigard Development Code, the minimum bicycle-parking requirement for an office use is 0.5 spaces per 1,000 square feet. Therefore, the proposed building will be required to provide 3 bicycle rack spaces. This standard is satisfied. Bicycle Parking Design Requirements: Section 18.765.050.C. The following design requirements apply to the installation of bicycle racks: The racks required for required bicycle parking spaces shall ensure that bicycles may be securely locked to them without undue inconvenience. Provision of bicycle lockers for long-term (employee) parking is encouraged but not required; bicycle racks must be securely anchored to the ground, wall or other structure; bicycle parking spaces shall be at least 21/2 feet by six feet long, and, when covered, with a vertical clearance of seven feet. An access aisle of at least five feet wide shall NOTICE OF TYPE II DECISION SDR2002-00006/JT ROTH OFFICE BUILDING PAGE 15 OF 25 be provided and maintained beside or between each row of bicycle parking; each required bicycle parking space must be accessible without moving another bicycle; required bicycle parking spaces may not be rented or leased except where required motor vehicle parking is rented or leased. At-cost or deposit fees for bicycle parking are exempt from this requirement; and areas set aside for required bicycle parking must be clearly reserved for bicycle parking only. Outdoor bicycle parking facilities shall be surfaced with a hard surfaced material, i.e., pavers, asphalt, concrete or similar material. This surface must be designed to remain well drained. The applicant has not provided a detail of the bike rack to be used, therefore, Staff is unable to confirm that this standard is met. Minimum Bicycle Parking Requirements: The total number of required bicycle parking spaces for each use is specified in Table 18.765.2 in Section 18.765.070.H. In no case shall there be less than two bicycle parking spaces. As discussed above, according to Table 18.765.2 of the Tigard Development Code, the minimum bicycle-parking requirement for an office use is 0.5 spaces per 1,000 square feet. Therefore, the proposal will be required to provide a 3-stall bicycle rack. This standard is satisfied. Minimum Off-Street Parking: Section 18.765.070.H states that the minimum and maximum parking shall be as required in Table 18.765.2. Table 18.765.2 states that the minimum parking for General Office Uses is 2.7 spaces per 1,000 square feet. The proposal is for a 7,634 square foot office building. The applicants proposal requires a minimum of 20 spaces and a maximum of 25 spaces. The applicant indicates that there will be 14 standard spaces, 1 van accessible space, and 10 compact spaces, however, the site plan indicates 15 compact spaces, 9 standard spaces, and 1 van accessible space. Nevertheless, the proposed 25 spaces do not exceed the maximum. This criterion is satisfied. Off-Street Loading Spaces: Commercial, industrial and institutional buildings or structures to be built or altered which receive and distribute material or merchandise by truck shall provide and maintain off-street loading and maneuvering space as follows: A minimum of one loading space is required for buildings with 10,000 gross square feet or more; A minimum of two loading spaces for buildings with 40,000 gross square feet or more. The building is not greater than 10,000 square feet, therefore, the applicant is not required to provide a loading space. FINDING: Based on the analysis above, the off-street parking and loading standards have not been fully satisfied, however, if the applicant complies with the conditions listed below, the standards will be met. CONDITIONS: • Prior to the issuance of building permits, the applicant shall submit a revised parking plan that demonstrates compliance with TDC Chapter 18.765. The plan shall not permit more than 50% of the spaces to be compact. • The project shall reserve 5 percent of the proposed parking for carpool/vanpool parking as close to the buildings as practicable, with the exception of disabled parking. The spaces shall be clearly labeled. • The compact parking spaces shall be marked as "compact" or with a large "C". The access drive shall be marked with directional arrows. NOTICE OF TYPE II DECISION SDR2002-00006/JT ROTH OFFICE BUILDING PAGE 16 OF 25 Signs (18.780): Chapter 18.780.130.D lists the type of allowable signs and sign area permitted in the MUE Zoning District. The proposed sign has been discussed previously in this report. As indicated, the proposed sign is over three feet in height and located within a vision clearance triangle. Signs are not permitted within vision clearance triangles unless they meet all of the criteria. Signs are reviewed through a separate permit process administered by the Development Services Technicians, and the application has been conditioned earlier in this report to attain a sign permit prior to erecting any signs on site. FINDING: Because signs will be reviewed and approved as part of a separate permit process, this standard has been satisfied. Tree Removal (18.790): Section 18.790.030 requires that a tree plan for the planting, removal and protection of trees prepared by a certified arborist shall be provided with a site development review application. The tree plan shall include identification of all existing trees, identification of a program to save existing trees or mitigate tree removal over 12 inches in caliper, which trees are to be removed, protection program defining standards and methods that will be used by the applicant to protect trees during and after construction. There are no trees over six inches in diameter on this lot. There are no trees being removed to accommodate this development. Therefore, this chapter is inapplicable. Visual Clearance Areas (18.795): Chapter 18.795 requires that a clear vision area shall be maintained on the corners of all property adjacent to intersecting right-of-ways or the intersection of a public street and a private driveway. A clear vision area shall contain no vehicle, hedge, planting, fence, wall structure, or temporary or permanent obstruction exceeding three (3) feet in height. The code provides that obstructions that may be located in this area shall be visually clear between three (3) and eight (8) feet in height (8) (trees may be placed within this area provided that all branches below eight (8) feet are removed). A visual clearance area is the triangular area formed by measuring a 30-foot distance along the street right- of-way and the driveway, and then connecting these two (2), 30-foot distance points with a straight line. The applicant has indicated in the narrative and the site plan that a clear vision area will be maintained. However, the vision clearance triangle on the site plan indicates that one of the parking spaces is located within the vision clearance triangle. This criterion is not satisfied. FINDING: Based on the analysis above, the vision clearance standards have not been met. However, if the applicant complies with the following condition, the standard will be met. CONDITION: Prior to the issuance of building permits, the applicant shall revise the parking plan to remove the parking space that is located within the vision clearance triangle. C. SPECIFIC SITE DEVELOPMENT REVIEW APPROVAL STANDARDS Section 18.360.090(A)(2) through 18.360.090(A)(15) provides additional Site Development Review approval standards not necessarily covered by the provisions of the previously listed sections. These additional standards are addressed immediately below with the following exceptions: The proposal contains no elements related to the provisions of the following and are, therefore, found to be inapplicable as approval standards: NOTICE OF TYPE II DECISION SDR2002-00006/JT ROTH OFFICE BUILDING PAGE 17 OF 25 18.360.090.3 (Exterior Elevations); 18.360.090.5 (Privacy and Noise: Multi-family or Group Living Uses); 18.360.090.6 (Private Outdoor Areas: Multi-family Use); 18.360.090.7 (Shared Outdoor Recreation Areas: Multi-family Use); 18.360.090.8 (100-year floodplain); and 18.360.090.9 (Demarcation of Spaces). The following sections were discussed previously in this decision and, therefore, will not be addressed in this section: 18.360.090.4 (Buffering, Screening and Compatibility Between Adjoining Uses; 18.360.090.13 Parking); 18.360.090.14 (Landscaping); 18.360.090.15 (Drainage); and 18.360.090.14 (Provision for the Disabled). Relationship to the Natural and Physical Environment: Buildings shall be: located to preserve existing trees, topography and natural drainage where possible based upon existing site conditions; located in areas not subject to ground slumping or sliding; located to provide adequate distance between adjoining buildings for adequate light, air circulation, and fire-fighting; and oriented with consideration for sun and wind. Trees shall be preserved to the extent possible. Replacement of trees is subject to the requirements of Chapter 18.790, Tree Removal. The building is located on the site in accordance with the Tigard Triangle Design Standards. The site is not in an area identified as prone to sliding. There are no natural features to speak of on site. The site is relatively flat with no trees or slopes associated with the site. FINDING: Based on the analysis above, this standard has been satisfied. Crime Prevention and Safety: A. Windows shall be located so that areas vulnerable to crime can be surveyed by the occupants; B. Interior laundry and service areas shall be located in a way that they can be observed by others; C. Mail boxes shall be located in lighted areas having vehicular or pedestrian traffic; E. The exterior lighting levels shall be selected and the angles shall be oriented towards areas vulnerable to crime; and E. Light fixtures shall be provided in areas having heavy pedestrian or vehicular traffic and in potentially dangerous areas such as parking lots, stairs, ramps and abrupt grade changes. Fixtures shall be placed at a height so that light patterns overlap at a height of seven feet, which is sufficient to illuminate a person. Windows are oriented towards the parking lot and the street. Light fixtures are not shown or described on the applicant's plans. The applicant will need to submit revised site or elevation plans that show light fixtures for the parking lots and walkway areas. FINDING: If the applicant complies with the condition listed below, the standards will be met. CONDITION: Submit a detailed lighting plan for the exterior of the building. Public Transit: Provisions within the plan shall be included for providing for transit if the development proposal is adjacent to an existing or proposed transit route; the requirements for transit facilities shall be based on: the location of other transit facilities in the area; and the size and type of the proposal. The following facilities may be required after City and Tri-Met review: bus stop shelters; turnouts for buses; and connecting paths to the shelters. The site has frontage on SW Beveland Street, SW 68th and SW 69th. There are no Tri-met transit routes on SW Beveland or SW 69th, however, SW 68'" is an identified route. Tri-met did not respond to a request for comments, and it does not appear that any facilities would be needed for this proposal. NOTICE OF TYPE II DECISION SDR2002-00006/JT ROTH OFFICE BUILDING PAGE 18 OF 25 FINDING: Based on the analysis above, this standard is satisfied. Street And Utility Improvements Standards (Section 18.810): Chapter 18.810 provides construction standards for the implementation of public and private facilities and utilities such as streets, sewers, and drainage. The applicable standards are addressed below: Streets: Improvements: Section 18.810.030.A.1 states that streets within a development and streets adjacent shall be improved in accordance with the TDC standards. Section 18.810.030.A.2 states that any new street or additional street width planned as a portion of an existing street shall be dedicated and improved in accordance with the TDC. Minimum Rights-of-Way and Street Widths: Section 18.620.080.A, Tigard Triangle Street and Accessway Standards, requires a local street to have a 60-foot right-of-way width and a 36-foot paved section. Other improvements required may include on-street parking, sidewalks and bikeways, underground utilities, street lighting, storm drainage, and street trees. This site lies adjacent to SW 68th Parkway, SW 69th Avenue and SW Beveland Street. 68th Parkway is classified as a minor arterial per the Triangle standards, requiring a 70-foot wide ROW. Both 69t Avenue and Beveland Street are classified as local streets per the Triangle standards. All three streets have been fully improved to meet current City standards. No further ROW dedications or street improvements are necessary. Sidewalks: Section 18.810.070.A requires that sidewalks be constructed to meet City design standards and be located on both sides of arterial, collector and local residential streets. Sidewalks have already been constructed along the frontages surrounding this site. This criterion is satisfied. Sanitary Sewers: Sewers Required: Section 18.810.090.A requires that sanitary sewer be installed to serve each new development and to connect developments to existing mains in accordance with the provisions set forth in Design and Construction Standards for Sanitary and Surface Water Management (as adopted by the Unified Sewerage Agency in 1996 and including any future revisions or amendments) and the adopted policies of the comprehensive plan. Over-sizing: Section 18.810.090.0 states that proposed sewer systems shall include consideration of additional development within the area as projected by the Comprehensive Plan. There is an existing 8-inch public sewer line located in 69th Avenue with ample capacity for this area. The applicant's plans show they will connect to this main line via an existing service lateral provided as a part of the 69t Avenue LID project. Storm Drainage: General Provisions: Section 18.810.100.A states requires developers to make adequate provisions for storm water and flood water runoff. NOTICE OF TYPE II DECISION SDR2002-00006/JT ROTH OFFICE BUILDING PAGE 19 OF 25 Accommodation of Upstream Drainage: Section 18.810.100.0 states that a culvert or other drainage facility shall be large enough to accommodate potential runoff from its entire upstream drainage area, whether inside or outside the development. The City Engineer shall approve the necessary size of the facility, based on the provisions of Design and Construction Standards for Sanitary and Surface Water Management (as adopted by the Unified Sewerage Agency in 2000 and including any future revisions or amendments). There are no existing upstream public drainage areas that impact this site. Effect on Downstream Drainage: Section 18.810.100.D states that where it is anticipated by the City Engineer that the additional runoff resulting from the development will overload an existing drainage facility, the Director and Engineer shall withhold approval of the development until provisions have been made for improvement of the potential condition or until provisions have been made for storage of additional runoff caused by the development in accordance with the Design and Construction Standards for Sanitary and Surface Water Management (as adopted by the Unified Sewerage agency in 2000 and including any future revisions or amendments). In 1997, Clean Water Services (CWS) completed a basin study of Fanno Creek and adopted the Fanno Creek Watershed Management Plan. Section V of that plan includes a recommendation that local governments institute a stormwater detention/effective impervious area reduction program resulting in no net increase in storm peak flows up to the 25-year event. The City will require that all new developments resulting in an increase of impervious surfaces provide onsite detention facilities, unless the development is located adjacent to Fanno Creek. For those developments adjacent to Fanno Creek, the storm water runoff will be permitted to discharge without detention. The applicant's plans show they will convey their onsite runoff to a detention facility near the southwest corner of the site. From thee, the water will be conveyed via pipe connection to an existing catch basin at the corner of 69 Avenue and Beveland Street. Bikeways and Pedestrian Pathways: Bikeway Extension: Section 18.810.110.A states that developments adjoining proposed bikeways identified on the City's adopted pedestrian/bikeway plan shall include provisions for the future extension of such bikeways through the dedication of easements or right-of-way. SW 68th Parkway is designated as a bicycle facility. Currently, there are no bike lanes striped along this roadway, although the roadway is of ample width to accommodate them. Cost of Construction: Section 18.810.110.B states that development permits issued for planned unit developments, conditional use permits, subdivisions, and other developments which will principally benefit from such bikeways shall be conditioned to include the cost or construction of bikeway improvements. The applicant should contribgte funds toward the future striping of a bike lane adjacent to the frontage of this site on SW 68 h Parkway. The amount of the striping would be as follows: • 90 feet of 8-inch white stripe, at $2.50/If $225.00 • 3 Mono-directional reflective markers © $4.00/ea $ 12.00 • 1 Bike lane legends © $175/ea $175.00 • 1 Directional mini-arrows © $100/ea $100.00 $512.00 Minimum Width: Section 18.810.110.0 states that the minimum width for bikeways within the roadway is five feet per bicycle travel lane. Minimum width for two-way bikeways separated from the road is eight feet. NOTICE OF TYPE II DECISION SDR2002-00006/JT ROTH OFFICE BUILDING PAGE 20 OF 25 As was stated previously, the existing pavement width on 68th Parkway is sufficient for bike lanes. Utilities: Section 18.810.120 states that all utility lines, but not limited to those required for electric, communication, lighting and cable television services and related facilities shall be placed underground, except for surface mounted transformers, surface mounted connection boxes and meter cabinets which may be placed above ground, temporary utility service facilities during construction, high capacity electric lines operating at 50,000 volts or above, and: • The developer shall make all necessary arrangements with the serving utility to provide the underground services; • The City reserves the right to approve location of all surface mounted facilities; • All underground utilities, including sanitary sewers and storm drains installed in streets by the developer, shall be constructed prior to the surfacing of the streets; and • Stubs for service connections shall be long enough to avoid disturbing the street improvements when service connections are made. Exception to Under-Grounding Requirement: Section 18.810.120.0 states that a developer shall pay a fee in-lieu of under-grounding costs when the development is proposed to take place on a street where existing utilities which are not underground will serve the development and the approval authority determines that the cost and technical difficulty of under-grounding the utilities outweighs the benefit of under-grounding in conjunction with the development. The determination shall be on a case-by-case basis. The most common, but not the only, such situation is a short frontage development for which under-grounding would result in the placement of additional poles, rather than the removal of above-ground utilities facilities. An applicant for a development which is served by utilities which are not underground and which are located across a public right-of-way from the applicant's property shall pay a fee in-lieu of under-grounding. There are no existing overhead utility lines adjacent to this site. D. ADDITIONAL CITY AND/OR AGENCY CONCERNS WITH STREET AND UTILITY IMPROVEMENT STANDARDS: Traffic Study Findings: The applicant's traffic engineer, Lancaster Engineering, submitted a traffic impact report, dated May 21, 2002, to address the project impacts to the following critical intersections: 72' Avenue/Dartmouth Street and 68 Parkway/Dartmouth Street. The two critical intersections have been identified as needing traffic signals. As development has occurred in the Tigard Triangle, and where a development introduces additional trips to these intersections, funds have been collected from the developers that will contribute to the future signal installation. The first project to contribute funds to the intersections was the Babies R Us project. A simple formula was established based upon the impact from that development. That project had an impact of 1.1% at SW 72" Avenue/SW Dartmouth Street during the PM peak hour. For that impact, the City Council required the developer to pay funds in the amount of $20,000.00. At the intersection of SW 68 Avenue/SW Dartmouth Street, the impact from that project was estimated to be 0.75%. For this impact, the developer was required to pay $10,000.00. Using this same rationale, a proportionate share has been calculated for other projects in the Triangle, and can be calculated for this project. Lancaster's report shows that t�is project will generate approximately four PM peak hour trips to the intersection of SW 72� Avenue/SW Dartmouth Street. With a total entering volume (TEV) of 2,555 vehicles, the project impact is approximately 0.16%. Therefore, based on simple proportions, the project contribution to this intersection is $2,909.00. NOTICE OF TYPE II DECISION SDR2002-00006/JT ROTH OFFICE BUILDING PAGE 21 OF 25 Likewise, the Lancaster report shows that the project will generate approximately three PM peak hour trips at the intersection of SW 68�h Avenue/SW Dartmouth Street. The expected TEV is approximately 2,660 vehicles. The impact from this development is approximately 0.11%. Therefore, based on the same proportion used in the Babies R Us development, the project contribution to this intersection is $1,467.00. Funds for both intersections must be paid to the City prior to a final building inspection. Public Water System: This site lies within the Tualatin Valley Water District (TVWD) service area. Comments were submitted by TVWD ,indicating that the applicant's plan is not quite accurate. The existing water line size in 68 Parkway is 8-inches, versus the 12-inch size shown on the plan. In addition, TVWR stated that there is an existing 1-inch meter provided to this site along the frontage of 68 Parkway. The applicant's plans show a proposed new water meter to be installed along the frontagQ of Beveland Street. TVWD will expect the applicant to use the existing 1-inch meter on 68 Parkway. Storm Water Quality: The City has agreed to enforce Surface Water Management (SWM) regulations established by the Unified Sewerage Agency (USA) Desicn and Construction Standards (adopted by Resolution and Order No. 00-7) which require the construction of on-site water quality facilities. The facilities shall be designed to remove 65 percent of the phosphorus contained in 100 percent of the storm water runoff generated from newly created impervious surfaces. In addition, a maintenance plan shall be submitted indicating the frequency and method to be used in keeping the facility maintained through the year. Prior to construction, the applicant shall submit plans and calculations for a water quality facility that will meet the intent of the CWS Design Standards. In addition, the applicant shall submit a maintenance plan for the facility that must be reviewed and approved by the City prior to construction. The applicant's preliminary sizing calculations show that they will treat a flow rate of approximately 0.033 CFS. This can be accommodated by the use of two Stormwater Management catch basin units. Staff concurs that this would be an acceptable solution. To ensure compliance with Clean Water Services design and construction standards, the applicant shall employ the design engineer responsible for the design and specifications of the private water quality facility to perform construction and visual observation of the water quality facility for compliance with the design and specifications. These inspections shall be made at significant stages throughout the project and at completion of the construction. Prior to final building inspection, the design engineer shall provide the City of Tigard (Inspection Supervisor) with written confirmation that the water quality facility is in compliance with the design and specifications. The proposed units from Stormwater Management is acceptable, provided the property owner agrees to hire the manufacturer (or approved equal) to provide the required maintenance of the units. Prior to a final building inspection, the applicant shall demonstrate that they have entered into a maintenance agreement with Stormwater Management, or another company that demonstrates they can meet the maintenance requirements of the manufacturer. Grading and Erosion Control: USA Design and Construction Standards also regulate erosion control to reduce the amount of sediment and other pollutants reaching the public storm and surface water system resulting from development, construction, grading, excavating, clearing, and any other activity which accelerates erosion. Per USA regulations, the applicant is required to submit an erosion control plan for City review and approval prior to issuance of City permits. A site grading plan will be reviewed by the Building Division as a part of the site permit review. NOTICE OF TYPE II DECISION SDR2002-00006/JT ROTH OFFICE BUILDING PAGE 22 OF 25 Address Assignments: The City of Tigard is responsible for assigning addresses for parcels within the City of Tigard and within the Urban Service Boundary (USB). An addressing fee in the amount of $30.00 per address shall be assessed. This fee shall be paid to the City prior to issuance of the site permit. For multi-tenant buildings, one address number is assigned to the building and then all tenant spaces are given suite numbers. The City is responsible for assigning the main address and suite numbers. This information is needed so that building permits for tenant improvements can be adequately tracked in the City's permit tracking system. Based upon the information provided by the applicant, this building will be a multi-tenant building. Prior to issuance of the site permit, the applicant shall provide a suite layout map so suite numbers can be assigned. The addressing fee will then be calculated based upon the number of suites that must be addressed. In multi-level structures, ground level suites shall have numbers preceded by a "1", second level suites shall have numbers preceded by a "2", etc. F. IMPACT STUDY (18.390) Section 18.360.090 states, "The Director shall make a finding with respect to each of the following criteria when approving, approving with conditions or denying an application:" Section 18.390.040 states that the applicant shall provide an impact study to quantify the effect of development on public facilities and services. For each public facility system and type of impact, the study shall propose improvements necessary to meet City standard, and to minimize the impact of the development on the public at large, public facilities systems, and affected private property users. In situations where the Community Development Code requires the dedication of real property interests, the applicant shall either specifically concur with a requirement for public right-of-way dedication, or provide evidence that supports that the real property dedication is not roughly proportional to the projected impacts of the development. Section 18.390.040 states that when a condition of approval requires the transfer to the public of an interest in real property, the approval authority shall adopt findings which support the conclusion that the interest in real property to be transferred is roughly proportional to the impact the proposed development will have on the public. The applicant has provided an impact study addressing the project's impacts on public systems. The Washington County Traffic Impact Fee (TIE) is a mitigation measure that is required at the time of development. Based on a transportation impact study prepared by Mr. David Larson for the A-Boy Expansion/Dolan II/Resolution 95-61, TIF's are expected to recapture 32 percent of the traffic impact of new development on the Collector and Arterial Street system. The applicant will be required to pay TIF's of approximately $27,392 Based on the estimate that total TIF fees cover 32 percent of the impact on major street improvements citywide, a fee that would cover 100 percent of this projects traffic impact is $85,600 ($27,392 divided by .32) The difference between the TIF paid, and the full impact, is considered the unmitigated impact on the street system. The unmitigated impact of this project on the transportation system is $58,208. The applicant will also be conditioned to contribute to the cost of signalizing the two key intersections described previously. The cost of these improvements is expected to be as follows: Total impacts $58,208 Less TIF $27,392 Less Bike Lane improvements $ 512 Less Signalization S 4,376 Total Unimitigated impacts S25,928 NOTICE OF TYPE II DECISION SDR2002-00006/JT ROTH OFFICE BUILDING PAGE 23 OF 25 As the value of the proposed improvements is less than the remaining unmitigated impact, it is clearly proportionate to exact these improvements. SECTION VIII. OTHER STAFF COMMENTS The City of Tigard Building Division has reviewed the proposal and offered the following comment: • All restrooms to be accessible per UBC chapter 11. The City of Tigard Public Works Department has reviewed the proposal has no objections to it. The City of Tigard Long Range Planning Division has reviewed the proposal has no objections to it. The City of Tigard Police Department has reviewed the proposal and offered the following comment: • Request detailed lighting plan for exterior. The City of Tigard Water Department has reviewed the proposal and found that the project is outside their service area and in TVWD jurisdiction. SECTION IX. AGENCY COMMENTS Clean Water Services has reviewed the proposal but offered no comments Tualatin Valley Water District has reviewed the proposal and offered the following comments: • Existing water line in SW 68th is 8 inches not 1?�inches. • Locate 1 inch water meter adjacent to SW 68 not ± 50 feet west of SW 68th on SW Beveland as shown on utility plan. The Tualatin Valley Fire and Rescue has reviewed the proposal and offered the following comments: • The minimum required fire flow is 2359 gpm @ 20 psi . Fire District records indicate the minimum required fire flow is available at the required fire hydrants. • A minimum of 2 fire hydrants shall be provided for this project. Fire hydrants shall be installed so that no part of the structure is more than 250 feet from a fire hydrant. The existing hydrants in the area are acceptable. • Fire hydrant locations shall be identified by the installation of reflective markers. The markers shall be blue. They shall be located adjacent and to the side of the centerline of the access roadway that the fire hydrant is located on. In case that there is no center line, then assume a centerline, and place the reflectors accordingly. • Approved fire apparatus access roadways and firefighting water supplies shall be installed and operational prior to stockpiling combustibles on-site or the commencement of combustible construction. • A Knox brand key box shall be provided on the building. Contact the Fire Marshal's Office for installation details and an application. NOTICE OF TYPE II DECISION SDR2002-00006/JT ROTH OFFICE BUILDING PAGE 24 OF 25 A building survey and plans, in accordance with TVF&R Ordinance 99-01, Appendix III- F, shall be submitted. A copy of Appendix III-F, the building survey form and the instructions are available on the Fire District web site. To access this information via Internet, follow this link: http://www.tvfr.com/Departments/FireMarshal/newconstruction.htm PGE, Verizon, Tri-Met, Qwest, and ODOT have all reviewed the proposal, but did not offer any comments. SECTION X. PROCEDURE AND APPEAL INFORMATION Notice: Notice was posted at City Hall and mailed to: X The applicant and owners X Owner of record within the required distance X Affected government agencies Final Decision: THIS DECISION IS FINAL ON JULY 22, 2002 AND BECOMES EFFECTIVE ON AUGUST 6, 2002 UNLESS AN APPEAL IS FILED. A�eaal: The decision of the Director (Type II Procedure) or Review Authority (Type II Administrative Appeal or Type III Procedure) is final for purposes of appeal on the date that it is mailed. Any party with standing as provided in Section 18.390.040.G.1. may appeal this decision in accordance with Section 18.390.040.G.2. of the Tigard Community Development Code which provides that a written appeal together with the required fee shall be filed with the Director within ten (10) business days of the date the notice of the decision was mailed. The appeal fee schedule and forms are available from the Planning Division of Tigard City Hall, 13125 SW Hall Boulevard, Tigard, Oregon 97223. Unless the applicant is the appellant, the hearing on an appeal from the Director's Decision shall be confined to the specific issues identified in the written comments submitted by the parties during the comment period. Additional evidence concerning issues properly raised in the Notice of Appeal may be submitted by any party during the appeal hearing, subject to any additional rules of procedure that may be adopted from time to time by the appellate body. TTHE DEADLINE FOR FILING AN APPEAL IS AT 5:00 PM ON AUGUST 5, 2002. Questions: If you have any questions, please call the City of Tigard Planning Division, Tigard City Hall, 13125 SW Hall Boulevard, Tigard, Oregon at (503) 639-4171. AW__7Jul 22, 2002 PREPA ED BY: Brad Kilby DATE Associate Planner i Pi�D1, July 22, 2002 APPROVED BY: Richard Bewers•• DATE Planning ManaEer NOTICE OF TYPE II DECISION SDR2002-00006/JT ROTH OFFICE BUILDING PAGE 25 OF 25 CITY of TIGA• I OEOOSAPN10 INFORMATION SYSTEM SW DOUGLAS DR I VICINITY MAP 1 w Q iMil 1 1 i -- SDR2002-00006 i 1 1 lint t,,- ELMHURST ST JT ROTH OFFICE W N BUILDING Q 1111(i lif vz- FRANKLIN ST ItE : .'ND ST cy, l' 1 . -IN INN. 0 . II a ' �� �4n�Hrx A t RA pu.< • 1 ^--- Qq Q� d RONrtA p_11111 IIII > r i, Z IIIIIII N REEF OF._ND RO, / •I " 1 I GONZAGA ST Tigard Area Map r S H cD ( lir�II N _ .1 . 0 10 200 300 400 Fast SW 1111111 1111 3 1"•324 feet HAMPTON ST N \ A City of Tigard 1° \1\) --- Informatlon on this map is for general location only and ra. Should G verified with the Development Services Division. �I 13125 SW Hell Blvd VW. � Tigard,OR 97223 } SW PAM (5031639.4171 httpJMww.ci.lipard.or.us Community Development Plot date:Jun 11,2002,.C:1magic\MAGIC03.APR / No / / IOW Kt, / T, � ,V i W4' i f.-; W / I "1' / 04 77 EXISTING PARKING n NEXIST PARKING 1 LANDSCAPING ( ) I 1 —� / VISUAL / V L L CLEARENCE TRASH ENCLOSEd I ID L J I .04t I'•ilP v .r..• I W.A. 5Z;=:: AREA � �� E... S- ACT SP AM•9-I' I' f BIKE PAR G A-STANDARD SP.41.7.411. M iliff% 61145 LLI Z iii* 111 \ +m iv AL ..wr—� ti UNI m If Y a.. att ■j\j! a 0 t 4 �-- • BUILDING �O CO - O N 4_____ _ 7 F N 11 N 6 M vol.. MAIN FLR 3652. SOFT,gi..........\ rr. 2ND FLR 39 82 SOFT. b Vf 7634. SOFT. c.r• S- • PACT S►AC 1ES 1 .I• 2∎STAND SPACES 111_0• / ®® niri....Ten MIR EXIS CITY IDEHAL<--- > 4 N ...----li J r� rx • OMIT.Hurt.•wr ,e. SW BEVELAND STREE A._ CITY of TIGARD SDR2002.00006 CITY ornoAno SITE PLAN N ROTH OFFICE BUILDING (Map is not to scale) NOTICE OF TYPE II DECISION SITE DEVELOPMENT REVIEW (SDR) 2002-00006 AeIL'M` � CITY OF TIOARD JT ROTH OFFICE BUILDING Community Development 1 ShapingA Better Community 120 DAYS = 9/28/2002 SECTION I. APPLICATION SUMMARY FILE NAME: JT ROTH OFFICE BUILDING CASE NO.: Site Development Review (SDR) SDR2002-00006 PROPOSAL: The applicant is requesting Site Development Review for construction of a two-story, 7,634 square foot office building in the Tigard Triangle. The property is 17,866 square feet in size, and currently vacant. A portion of the property is surplus right-of-way that is being sold to the applicant. APPLICANT\ JT Roth Construction, Inc. OWNER: City of Tigard OWNER: 12600 SW 72nd, Suite 200 13125 SW Hall Blvd. Portland, OR 97223 Tigard, OR 97223 LOCATION: The property is located on the corner of 68th and Beveland and is described as, WCTM 2S101AA, Tax Lots 8300, 8500, 8600 and 8700. ZONE: MUE. Mixed Use Employment. The MUE zoning district is designed to apply to a majority of the land within the Tigard Triancle, a regional mixed-use employment district bounded by Pacific Highway (-Iwy. 99), Highway 217 and 1-5. This zoning district permits a wide range of uses including major retail goods and services, business/professional offices, civic uses and housing; the latter includes multi-family housing at a maximum density of 25 units/acre, equivalent to the R-25 zoning district. A wide range of uses, including but not limited to community recreation facilities, religious institutions, medical centers, schools, utilities and transit-related park-and-ride lots, are permitted conditionally. APPLICABLE REVIEW CRITERIA: Community Development Code Chapters 18.360, 18.390, 18.520, 18.620, 18.705, 18.725, 18.745, 18.755, 18.765, 18.780, 18.790, 18.795 and 18.810. SECTION II . DECISION Notice is hereby given that the City of Tigard Community Development Director's designee has APPROVED the above Site Development Review request subject to certain conditions of approval. The findings and conclusions on which the decision is based are noted in the full decision, available at City Hall. THIS APPROVAL SHALL BE VALID FOR 18 MONTHS FROM THE EFFECTIVE DATE OF THIS DECISION. All documents and applicable criteria in the above-noted file are available for inspection at no cost or copies can be obtained for twenty-five cents (250 per page, or the current rate charged for copies at the time of the request. SECTION III. PROCEDURE AND APPEAL INFORMATION Notice: Notice mailed to: X The applicant and owners X Owner of record within the required distance X Affected government agencies Final Decision: THIS DECISION IS FINAL ON JULY 22, 2002 AND BECOMES EFFECTIVE ON AUGUST 6, 2002 UNLESS AN APPEAL IS FILED. Areal: The Director's Decision is final on the date that it is mailed. All persons entitled to notice or who are otherwise adversely affected or aggrieved by the decision as provided in Section 18.390.040.G.1 may appeal this decision in accordance with Section 18.390.040.G.2 of the Tigard Community Development Code which provides that a written appeal together with the required fee shall be filed with the Director within ten (10) business days of the date the Notice of Decision was mailed. The appeal fee schedule and forms are available from the Planning Division of Tigard City Hall, 13125 SW Hall Boulevard, Tigard, Oregon 97223. Unless the applicant is the appellant, the hearing on an appeal from the Director's Decision shall be confined to the specific issues identified in the written comments submitted by the parties during the comment period. Additional evidence concerning issues properly raised in the Notice of Appeal may be submitted by any party during the appeal hearing, subject to any additional rules of procedure that may be adopted from time to time by the appellate body. I THE DEADLINE FOR FILING AN APPEAL IS 5:00 PM ON AUGUST 5, 2002. I Questions: For further information please contact the Planning Division Staff Planner, Brad Kilby at (503) 639-4171 , Tigard City Hall, 13125 SW Hall Boulevard, Tigard, Oregon 97223. CITY o111GNRD 11111. t II a VICINITY MAP IN a. - F ■ :: SDR2002-00006 ftri MMURST ST ' { 1 _...,JT ROTH OFFICE �� MINN BUILDING 1 _ .. r ■ .. I , iii ��.I ,� � � \ ''∎\x: ` III.' .� .11 11111 IILII1LI = ■ ■: T---. ARAB' f GONZAGA ST ■iii = N\ SW ■ IL ■1■■i ..»..., M HAMPTON S7 A . - -- - - City of Tigard I.^\\ -- l'f ''' 1 ''.rOrrI Z=1∎74 11 4 Q [ N...T....I •/1 L..RDKM�N6 / \ TU.g»CLONta I /�rtg»Cg ` a I •t •t . .•I . Q C/` I ,%rM . WI I \ ��.�r �, W fil (-Cuiz iu V:—gU I e �� I �, GG BuluowG % I— --- .... .� .._ i 0 ft.*RR wet. .. I N �RV�O svr- _ ANIMMai1__ i Mil i y �� y .� `- -S BEVELAND STRE .44 CITY OF TIGARD T SDR2002•00008 SITE PLAN N ROTH OFFICE BUILDING (Map Is not to scale) AFFIDAVIT OF POSTING NOTICE OF A LAND USE PROPOSAL IMPORTANT NOTICE: THIS AFFIDAVIT MUST BE ACCOMPANIED BY A COPY OF THE NOTICE THAT WAS POSTED ON THE SITE. In the Matter of the Proposed Land Use Applications for: Land Use File Nos.: SDR2002-00006 Land Use File Name: JT ROTH OFFICE BUILDING I, Brad Kilby, Associate Planner for the City of Tigard, do affirm that I posted notice of the land use proposal affecting the land located at (state the approximate location(sl IF no address(s) and/or tax lot(s) currently registered) a�,tC>(AA 3n'-'' (:6 sc'r')B(.,6 ) 3 snor, , and did personally post notice of the proposed land use application(s) by means of weatherproof posting in the general vicinity of the affected territory, a copy of said notice being hereto attached and by reference made a part hereof, on the - day of , 2002. ifrzsmi-i'2-? /41, kj% Signature of Person Who Performed Posting (In the presence of the Notary) (THIS SECTION FOR A STATE OF OREGON, NOTARY PUBLIC TO COMPLETE/NOTARIZE) STATE OF OREGON ) County of Washington ) ss. Subscribed and sworn/affirmed before me on the // / day of ,SL Me , 20 OZ_ �' 1. It, . �. ' �t� `d ' 4+ NOTARY PUBLIC OF OREGON CO;�►' , ,x My Commission Expires:Ifi4 ZooJ max sue' BHEANAN B.GASPER h:\login\pattylmasterstaifidavit of posting for applicant to post public hearing.doc \' / COMMISSION ;12.E3G4(?9N MY COMMISSION EXPIRES MAY 13,2003 JT ROTH OFFICE BUIIIIING SITE DEVELOPMENT REVIEW (SDR) 2002-00006 REQUEST: The applicant is requesting Site Development Review approval for the construction of a two-story, 7,634 square foot office building in the Tigard Triangle. The property is 17,866 square feet in size. LOCATION : The property located on the corner of SW 68th Avenue and SW Beveland Street. WCTM 2S101AA, Tax Lots 8300, 8500, 8600 and 8700. ZONE: MUE: Mixed-Use Employment. The MUE zoning district is designed to apply to a majority of the land within the Tigard Triangle, a regional mixed-use employment district bounded by Pacific Highway (Hwy. 99), Highway 217 and 1-5. This zoning district permits a wide range of uses including major retail goods and services, business/professional offices, civic uses and housing; the latter includes multi- family housing at a maximum density of 25 units/acre, equivalent to the R-25 mning district. APPLICABLE REVIEW CRITERIA: Community Development Code Chapters 18.360, 18.390, 18.520, 18.620, 18.705, 18.725, 18.745, 18.755, 18.765, 18.780, 18.790, 18.795 and 18.810. Further information may be obtained from the Planning Division (staff contact: Brad Kilby) at 13125 SW Hall Blvd., Tigard, Oregon 97223, or by calling 503-639-4171 . A copy of the application and all documents and evidence submitted by or on behalf of the applicant and the applicable criteria are available for inspection at no cost and copies for all items can also be provided at a reasonable cost. NOTICE TO MORTGAGEE, LIENHOLDER,VENDOR OR SELLER: THE TIGARD DEVELOPMENT CODE REQUIRES THAT IF YOU RECEIVE THIS NOTICE,IT SHALL BE PROMPTLY FORWARDED TO THE PURCHASER. NOTICE OF PENDING LAND USE APPLICATION 4 , , SITE DEVELOPMENT REVIEW ,, _I� CITY OF TIGARD Community(Development Shaping Better Community DATE OF NOTICE: June 12, 2002 FILE NUMBER: SITE DEVELOPMENT REVIEW (SDR) 2002-00006 Type II Land Use Application FILE NAME: JT ROTH OFFICE BUILDING PROPOSAL: The applicant is requesting Site Development Review approval for the construction of a two-story, 7,634 square foot office building in the Tigard Triangle. The property is 17,866 square feet in size. ZONE: MUE: Mixed-Use Employment. The MUE zoning district is designed to apply to a majority of the land within the Tigard Triangle, a regional mixed-use employment district bounded by Pacific Highway (Hwy. 99), Highway 217 and 1-5. This zoning district permits a wide range of uses including major retail goods and services, business/professional offices, civic uses and housing; the latter includes multi-family housing at a maximum density of 25 units/acre, equivalent to the R-25 zoning district. APPLICABLE REVIEW CRITERIA: Community Development Code Chapters 18.360, 18.390, 18.520, 18.620, 18.705, 18.725, 18.745, 18.755, 18.765, 18.780, 18.790, 18.795 and 18.810. LOCATION: The property is located on the corner of SW 68`h Avenue and SW Beveland Street. WCTM 2S101AA, Tax Lots 8300, 8500, 8600 and 8700. YOUR RIGHT TO PROVIDE WRITTEN COMMENTS: Prior to the City making any decision on the Application, you are hereby provided a fourteen (14) day period to submit written comments on the application to the City. THE FOURTEEN (14) DAY PERIOD ENDS AT 5:00 PM ON JUNE 26, 2002. All comments should be directed to Brad Kilby, Associate Planner in the Planning Division at the City of Tigard, 13125 SW Hall Boulevard, Tigard, Oregon 97223. You may reach the City of Tigard by telephone at (503) 639-4171. ALL COMMENTS MUST BE RECEIVED BY THE CITY OF TIGARD IN WRITING PRIOR TO 5:00 PM ON THE DATE SPECIFIED ABOVE IN ORDER FOR YOUR COMMENTS TO BE CONSIDERED IN THE DECISION MAKING PROCESS THE CITY OF TIGARD APPRECIATES RECEIVING COMMENTS AND VALUES YOUR INPUT. COMMENTS WILL BE CONSIDERED AND ADDRESSED WITHIN THE NOTICE OF DECISION. A DECISION ON THIS ISSUE IS TENTATIVELY SCHEDULED FOR JULY 19, 2002. IF YOU PROVIDE COMMENTS, YOU WILL BE SENT A COPY OF THE FULL DECISION ONCE IT HAS BEEN RENDERED. WRITTEN COMMENTS WILL BECOME A PART OF THE PERMANENT PUBLIC RECORD AND SHALL. CONTAIN THE FOLLOWING INFORMATION: • Address the specific "Applicable Review Criteria" described in the section above or any other criteria believed to be applicable to this proposal; • Raise any issues and/or concerns believed to be important with sufficient evidence to allow the City to provide a response; • Comments that provide the basis for an appeal to the Tigard Hearings Officer must address the relevant approval criteria with sufficient specificity on that issue. A Failure of any party to address the relevant approval criteria with sufficient specificity may preclude subsequent appeals to the Land Use Board of Appeals or Circuit Court on that issue. Specific findings directed at the relevant approval criteria are what constitute relevant evidence. AFTER THE 14 DAY COMMENT PERIOD CLOSES, THE DIRECTOR SHALL ISSUE A TYPE II ADMINISTRATIVE DECISION. THE DIRECTOR'S DECISION SHALL BE MAILED TO THE APPLICANT AND TO OWNERS OF RECORD OF PROPERTY LOCATED WITHIN 500 FEET OF THE SUBJECT SITE, AND TO ANYONE ELSE WHO SUBMITTED WRITTEN COMMENTS OR WHO IS OTHERWISE ENTITLED TO NOTICE. THE DIRECTOR'S DECISION SHALL ADDRESS ALL OF THE RELEVANT APPROVAL CRITERIA. BASED UPON THE CRITERIA AND THE FACTS CONTAINED WITHIN THE RECORD, THE DIRECTOR SHALL APPROVE, APPROVE WITH CONDITIONS OR DENY THE REQUESTED PERMIT OR ACTION. SUMMARY OF THE DECISION-MAKING PROCESS: . The application is accepted by the City . Notice is sent to property owners of record within 500 feet of the proposed development area allowing a 14-day written comment period. . The application is reviewed by City Staff and affected agencies. . City Staff issues a written decision. . Notice of the decision is sent to the Applicant and all owners or contract purchasers of record of the site; all owners of record of property located within 500 feet of the site, as shown on the most recent property tax assessment roll; any City-recognized neighborhood group whose boundaries include the site; and any governmental agency which is entitled to notice under an intergovernmental agreement entered into with the City which includes provision for such notice or anyone who is otherwise entitled to such notice. INFORMATION/EVIDENCE AVAILABLE FOR REVIEW: The application, written comments and supporting documents relied upon by the Director to make this decision are contained within the record and are available for public review at the City of Tigard Community Development Department. Copies of these items may be obtained at a cost of $.25 per page or the current rate charged for this service. Questions regarding this application should be directed to the Planning Staff indicated on the first page of this Notice under the section titled "Your Right to Provide Written Comments."l awooua1rdi 1W, � VICINITY MAP 0 > 11 d SDR2002-00006 _ LMHURST ST �I I I �� i IT ROTH OFFICE r?. i T. E _ BUILDING Walt I FRANKLIN ST 1 ,iriepi ,,,,..::� l RN i 1 40 SlabWir*Agt N Qi n , II GONZAGA $•• .•• .•• II , • ] _ °° --- N SW III -s a . . 3r.M HAMPTON ST rl City aTigard i\ ,. naw w.ri s..a wv...r t�aa w.ir. ..e-....dsws� ■ REQUEST FOR COMMENTS MEMORANDUM CITY OF TIGARD, OREGON DATE: July 18, 2002 TO: Brad Kilby, Associate Planner FROM: Brian Rager, Development Review Engineer RE: SDR 2002-00006, JT Roth Office Building Street And Utility Improvements Standards (Section 18.810): Chapter 18.810 provides construction standards for the implementation of public and private facilities and utilities such as streets, sewers, and drainage. The applicable standards are addressed below: Streets: Improvements: Section 18.810.030.A.1 states that streets within a development and streets adjacent shall be improved in accordance with the TDC standards. Section 18.810.030.A.2 states that any new street or additional street width planned as a portion of an existing street shall be dedicated and improved in accordance with the TDC. Minimum Rights-of-Way and Street Widths: Section 18.620.080.A, Tigard Triangle Street and Accessway Standards, requires a local street to have a 60-foot right-of-way width and 36-foot paved section. Other improvements required may include on-street parking, sidewalks and bikeways, underground utilities, street lighting, storm drainage, and street trees. This site lies adjacent to SW 68th Parkway, SW 69th Avenue and SW Beveland Street. 68th Parkway is classified as a minor arterial per the Triangle standards, requiring a 70-foot wide ROW. Both 69th Avenue and Beveland Street are classified as local streets per the Triangle standards. All three streets have been fully improved to meet current City standards. No further ROW dedications or street improvements are necessary. ENGINEERING COMMENTS SDR 2002-00006 JT Roth Office Building PAGE 1 Sanitary Sewers: Sewers Required: Section 18.810.090.A requires that sanitary sewer be installed to serve each new development and to connect developments to existing mains in accordance with the provisions set forth in Design and Construction Standards for Sanitary and Surface Water Management (as adopted by Clean Water Services in 1996 and including any future revisions or amendments) and the adopted policies of the comprehensive plan. Over-sizing: Section 18.810.090.0 states that proposed sewer systems shall include consideration of additional development within the area as projected by the Comprehensive Plan. There is an existing 8-inch public sewer line located in 69th Avenue with ample capacity for this area. The applicant's plans show they will connect to this main line via an existing service lateral provided as a part of the 69th Avenue LID project. Storm Drainage: General Provisions: Section 18.810.100.A states requires developers to make adequate provisions for storm water and flood water runoff. Accommodation of Upstream Drainage: Section 18.810.100.0 states that a culvert or other drainage facility shall be large enough to accommodate potential runoff from its entire upstream drainage area, whether inside or outside the development. The City Engineer shall approve the necessary size of the facility, based on the provisions of Design and Construction Standards for Sanitary and Surface Water Management (as adopted by Clean Water Services in 2000 and including any future revisions or amendments). There are no existing upstream public drainage areas that impact this site. Effect on Downstream Drainage: Section 18.810.100.D states that where it is anticipated by the City Engineer that the additional runoff resulting from the development will overload an existing drainage facility, the Director and Engineer shall withhold approval of the development until provisions have been made for improvement of the potential condition or until provisions have been made for storage of additional runoff caused by the development in accordance with the Design and Construction Standards for Sanitary and Surface Water Management (as adopted by Clean Water Services in 2000 and including any future revisions or amendments). ENGINEERING COMMENTS SDR 2002-00006 JT Roth Office Building PAGE 2 In 1997, Clean Water Services (CWS) completed a basin study of Fanno Creek and adopted the Fanno Creek Watershed Management Plan. Section V of that plan includes a recommendation that local governments institute a stormwater detention/effective impervious area reduction program resulting in no net increase in storm peak flows up to the 25-year event. The City will require that all new developments resulting in an increase of impervious surfaces provide onsite detention facilities, unless the development is located adjacent to Fanno Creek. For those developments adjacent to Fanno Creek, the storm water runoff will be permitted to discharge without detention. The applicant's plans show they will convey their onsite runoff to a detention facility near the southwest corner of the site. From there, the water will be conveyed via pipe connection to an existing catch basin at the corner of 69th Avenue and Beveland Street. Bikeways and Pedestrian Pathways: Bikeway Extension: Section 18.810.110.A states that developments adjoining proposed bikeways identified on the City's adopted pedestrian/bikeway plan shall include provisions for the future extension of such bikeways through the dedication of easements or right-of-way. SW 68th Parkway is designated as a bicycle facility. Currently, there are no bike lanes striped along this roadway, although the roadway is of ample width to accommodate them. Cost of Construction: Section 18.810.110.B states that development permits issued for planned unit developments, conditional use permits, subdivisions, and other developments which will principally benefit from such bikeways shall be conditioned to include the cost or construction of bikeway improvements. The applicant should contribute funds toward the future striping of a bike lane adjacent to the frontage of this site on SW 68th Parkway. The amount of the striping would be as follows: • 90 feet of 8-inch white stripe, at $2.50/If $225.00 • 3 Mono-directional reflective markers @ $4.00/ea $ 12.00 • 1 Bike lane legends @ $175/ea $175.00 • 1 Directional mini-arrows @ $100/ea $100.00 $512.00 Minimum Width: Section 18.810.110.0 states that the minimum width for bikeways within the roadway is five feet per bicycle travel lane. Minimum width for two-way bikeways separated from the road is eight feet. ENGINEERING COMMENTS SDR 2002-00006 JT Roth Office Building PAGE 3 As was stated previously, the existing pavement width on 68th Parkway is sufficient for bike lanes. Utilities: Section 18.810.120 states that all utility lines, but not limited to those required for electric, communication, lighting and cable television services and related facilities shall be placed underground, except for surface mounted transformers, surface mounted connection boxes and meter cabinets which may be placed above ground, temporary utility service facilities during construction, high capacity electric lines operating at 50,000 volts or above, and: • The developer shall make all necessary arrangements with the serving utility to provide the underground services; • The City reserves the right to approve location of all surface mounted facilities; • All underground utilities, including sanitary sewers and storm drains installed in streets by the developer, shall be constructed prior to the surfacing of the streets; and • Stubs for service connections shall be long enough to avoid disturbing the street improvements when service connections are made. Exception to Under-Grounding Requirement: Section 18.810.120.0 states that a developer shall pay a fee in-lieu of under-grounding costs when the development is proposed to take place on a street where existing utilities which are not underground will serve the development and the approval authority determines that the cost and technical difficulty of under- grounding the utilities outweighs the benefit of under-grounding in conjunction with the development. The determination shall be on a case- by-case basis. The most common, but not the only, such situation is a short frontage development for which under-grounding would result in the placement of additional poles, rather than the removal of above-ground utilities facilities. An applicant for a development which is served by utilities which are not underground and which are located across a public right-of-way from the applicant's property shall pay a fee in-lieu of under- grounding. There are no existing overhead utility lines adjacent to this site. ENGINEERING COMMENTS SDR 2002-00006 JT Roth Office Building PAGE 4 ADDITIONAL CITY AND/OR AGENCY CONCERNS WITH STREET AND UTILITY IMPROVEMENT STANDARDS: Traffic Study Findings: The applicant's traffic engineer, Lancaster Engineering, submitted a traffic impact report, dated May 21, 2002, to address the project impacts to the following critical intersections: 72nd Avenue/Dartmouth Street and 68th Parkway/Dartmouth Street. The two critical intersections have been identified as needing traffic signals. As development has occurred in the Tigard Triangle, and where a development introduces additional trips to these intersections, funds have been collected from the developers that will contribute to the future signal installation. The first project to contribute funds to the intersections was the Babies R Us project. A simple formula was established based upon the impact from that development. That project had an impact of 1.1% at SW 72nd Avenue/SW Dartmouth Street during the PM peak hour. For that impact, the City Council required the developer to pay funds in the amount of $20,000.00. At the intersection of SW 68th Avenue/SW Dartmouth Street, the impact from that project was estimated to be 0.75%. For this impact, the developer was required to pay $10,000.00. Using this same rationale, a proportionate share has been calculated for other projects in the Triangle, and can be calculated for this project. Lancaster's report shows that this project will generate approximately four PM peak hour trips to the intersection of SW 72nd Avenue/SW Dartmouth Street. With a total entering volume (TEV) of 2,555 vehicles, the project impact is approximately 0.16%. Therefore, based on simple proportions, the project contribution to this intersection is $2,909.00. Likewise, the Lancaster report shows that the project will generate approximately three PM peak hour trips at the intersection of SW 68th Avenue/SW Dartmouth Street. The expected TEV is approximately 2,660 vehicles. The impact from this development is approximately 0.11%. Therefore, based on the same proportion used in the Babies R Us development, the project contribution to this intersection is $ 1,467.00. Funds for both intersections must be paid to the City prior to a final building inspection. Public Water System: This site lies within the Tualatin Valley Water District (TVWD) service area. Comments were submitted by TVWD indicating that the applicant's plan is not quite accurate. The existing water line size in 68th Parkway is 8-inches, versus ENGINEERING COMMENTS SDR 2002-00006 JT Roth Office Building PAGE 5 the 12-inch size shown on the plan. In addition, TVWD stated that there is an existing 1-inch meter provided to this site along the frontage of 68th Parkway. The applicant's plans show a proposed new water meter to be installed along the frontage of Beveland Street. TVWD will expect the applicant to use the existing 1-inch meter on 68th Parkway. Storm Water Quality: The City has agreed to enforce Surface Water Management (SWM) regulations established by Clean Water Services (CWS) Design and Construction Standards (adopted by Resolution and Order No. 00-7) which require the construction of on-site water quality facilities. The facilities shall be designed to remove 65 percent of the phosphorus contained in 100 percent of the storm water runoff generated from newly created impervious surfaces. In addition, a maintenance plan shall be submitted indicating the frequency and method to be used in keeping the facility maintained through the year. Prior to construction, the applicant shall submit plans and calculations for a water quality facility that will meet the intent of the CWS Design Standards. In addition, the applicant shall submit a maintenance plan for the facility that must be reviewed and approved by the City prior to construction. The applicant's preliminary sizing calculations show that they will treat a flow rate of approximately 0.033 CFS. This can be accommodated by the use of two Stormwater Management catch basin units. Staff concurs that this would be an acceptable solution. To ensure compliance with Clean Water Services design and construction standards, the applicant shall employ the design engineer responsible for the design and specifications of the private water quality facility to perform construction and visual observation of the water quality facility for compliance with the design and specifications. These inspections shall be made at significant stages throughout the project and at completion of the construction. Prior to final building inspection, the design engineer shall provide the City of Tigard (Inspection Supervisor) with written confirmation that the water quality facility is in compliance with the design and specifications. The proposed units from Stormwater Management is acceptable, provided the property owner agrees to hire the manufacturer (or approved equal) to provide the required maintenance of the units. Prior to a final building inspection, the applicant shall demonstrate that they have entered into a maintenance agreement with Stormwater Management, or another company that demonstrates they can meet the maintenance requirements of the manufacturer. ENGINEERING COMMENTS SDR 2002-00006 JT Roth Office Building PAGE 6 Grading and Erosion Control: CWS Design and Construction Standards also regulate erosion control to reduce the amount of sediment and other pollutants reaching the public storm and surface water system resulting from development, construction, grading, excavating, clearing, and any other activity which accelerates erosion. Per CWS regulations, the applicant is required to submit an erosion control plan for City review and approval prior to issuance of City permits. The Federal Clean Water Act requires that a National Pollutant Discharge Elimination System (NPDES) erosion control permit be issued for any development that will disturb five or more acres of land. Since this site is over five acres, the developer will be required to obtain an NPDES permit from the City prior to construction. This permit will be issued along with the site and/or building permit. A site grading plan will be reviewed by the Building Division as a part of the site permit review. Address Assignments: The City of Tigard is responsible for assigning addresses for parcels within the City of Tigard and within the Urban Service Boundary (USB). An addressing fee in the amount of $ 30.00 per address shall be assessed. This fee shall be paid to the City prior to issuance of the site permit. For multi-tenant buildings, one address number is assigned to the building and then all tenant spaces are given suite numbers. The City is responsible for assigning the main address and suite numbers. This information is needed so that building permits for tenant improvements can be adequately tracked in the City's permit tracking system. Based upon the information provided by the applicant, this building will be a multi-tenant building. Prior to issuance of the site permit, the applicant shall provide a suite layout map so suite numbers can be assigned. The addressing fee will then be calculated based upon the number of suites that must be addressed. In multi-level structures, ground level suites shall have numbers preceded by a "1", second level suites shall have numbers preceded by a "2", etc. ENGINEERING COMMENTS SDR 2002-00006 JT Roth Office Building PAGE 7 Recommendations: THE FOLLOWING CONDITIONS SHALL BE SATISFIED PRIOR TO ISSUANCE OF THE SITE PERMIT: Submit to the Engineering Department (Brian Rager, 639-4171, ext. 318) for review and approval: Prior to issuance of the site permit, the applicant shall submit a suite layout map to Shirley Treat, Engineering Department. If the applicant is not sure how many suites will be used, they must estimate a number. The City will then assign suite numbers and the address fee will then be calculated. The applicant prior to issuance of the site permit must pay the fee. (STAFF CONTACT: Shirley Treat, Engineering). The applicant shall provide an on-site water quality facility as required by Clean Water Services Design and Construction Standards (adopted by Resolution and Order No. 00-7). Final plans and calculations shall be submitted to the Engineering Department (Brian Rager) for review and approval prior to issuance of the site permit. In addition, a proposed maintenance plan shall be submitted along with the plans and calculations for review and approval. THE FOLLOWING CONDITIONS SHALL BE SATISFIED PRIOR TO ISSUANCE OF THE BUILDING PERMIT: Submit to the Engineering Department (Brian Rager, 639-4171, ext. 318) for review and approval: Prior to issuance of a building permit, the applicant shall obtain approval from the Tualatin Valley Water District for the proposed water connection. THE FOLLOWING CONDITIONS SHALL BE SATISFIED PRIOR TO A FINAL BUILDING INSPECTION: Submit to the Engineering Department (Brian Rager, 639-4171, ext. 318) for review and approval: Prior to final building inspection, the applicant shall par $512.00 to the City for the striping of the bike lane along the frontage of 68t Parkway. ENGINEERING COMMENTS SDR 2002-00006 JT Roth Office Building PAGE 8 To ensure compliance with Clean Water Services design and construction standards, the applicant shall employ the design engineer responsible for the design and specifications of the private water quality facility to perform construction and visual observation of the water quality facility for compliance with the design and specifications. These inspections shall be made at significant stages, and at completion of the construction. Prior to final building inspection, the design engineer shall provide the City of Tigard (Inspection Supervisor) with written confirmation that the water quality facility is in compliance with the design and specifications. Staff Contact: Hap Watkins, Building Division. Prior to a final building inspection, the applicant shall demonstrate that they have entered into a maintenance agreement with Stormwater Management, or another company that demonstrates they can meet the maintenance requirements of the manufacturer, for the proposed onsite storm water treatment facility. \eng\brianr\com ments\sdr\sdr2002-00006.doc ENGINEERING COMMENTS SDR 2002-00006 JT Roth Office Building PAGE 9 Bradley Kilby-JT Roth Office Buildina.doc Page 1 TUALATIN VALLEY FIRE & RESCUE • SOUTH DIVISION COMMUNITY SERVICES • OPERATIONS • FIRE PREVENTION June 26,2002 Brad Kilby,Associate Planner City of Tigard 13125 SW Hall Blvd Tigard,OR 97223 Re: JT Roth Office Building Dear Brad, I have reviewed the submittal for the above named project and have the following comments: 1. The minimum required fire flow is 2359 gpm @ 20 psi . Fire District records indicate the minimum required fire flow is available at the required fire hydrants. 2. A minimum of 2 fire hydrants shall be provided for this project. Fire hydrants shall be installed so that no part of the structure is more than 250 feet from a fire hydrant. The existing hydrants in the area are acceptable. 3. Fire hydrant locations shall be identified by the installation of reflective markers. The markers shall be blue. They shall be located adjacent and to the side of the centerline of the access roadway that the fire hydrant is located on. In case that there is no center line,then assume a centerline,and place the reflectors accordingly. 4. Approved fire apparatus access roadways and firefighting water supplies shall be installed and operational prior to stockpiling combustibles on-site or the commencement of combustible construction. 5. A Knox brand key box shall be provided on the building. Contact the Fire Marshal's Office for installation details and an application. 6. A building survey and plans, in accordance with TVF&R Ordinance 99-01,Appendix III-F,shall be submitted. A copy of Appendix III-F,the building survey form and the instructions are available on the Fire District web site. To access this information via Internet,follow this link: http://www.tvfr.com/Deoartments/FireMarshal/newconstruction.htm Please contact me at(503)612-7010 with any additional questions. Sincerely, Eric T. McMullen Eric T. McMullen Deputy Fire Marshal 7401 SW Washo Court,Suite 101 •Tualatin,Oregon V22 .(503)612-7000•Fax(503)612-7003•www.tvfr.com REQUEST FOR COMMENTS CITY TOFTIGARD Community Development Shaping Better Community DATE: lune 12,2002 RECEIVED PLANNING TO: Daryl Jones,Senior Plans Examiner JUL i 0 2002 FROM: City of Tigard Planning Division CITY ok TtGARD STAFF CONTACT: Brad Kilhy,Associate Planner[x24341 Phone: [5031639-4111/Fax: [503)684-7291 SITE DEVELOPMENT REVIEW[SDRJ 2002-00006 IT ROTH OFFICE BUILDING REQUEST: The applicant is requesting Site Development Review approval for the construction of a two- story, 7,634 square foot office building in the Tigard Triangle. The property is 17,866 square feet in size. LOCATION: The property is located on the corner of SW 68 th Avenue and SW Beveland Street. WCTM 2S101AA, Tax Lots 8300, 8500, 8600 and 8700. ZONE: MUE: Mixed-Use Employment. The MUE zoning district is designed to apply to a majority of the land within the Tigard Triangle, a regional mixed-use employment district bounded by Pacific Highway (Hwy. 99), Highway 217 and 1-5. This zoning district permits a wide range of uses including major retail goods and services, business/professional offices, civic uses and housing; the latter includes multi-family housing at a maximum density of 25 units/acre, equivalent to the R-25 zoning district. APPLICABLE REVIEW CRITERIA: Community Development Code Chapters 18.360, 18.390, 18.520, 18.620, 18.705, 18.725, 18.745, 18.755, 18.765, 18.780, 18.790, 18.795 and 18.810. Attached are the Site Plan, Vicinity Map and Applicant's Materials for your review. From information supplied by various departments and agencies and from other information available to our staff, a report and recommendation will be prepared and a decision will be rendered on the proposal in the near future. If you wish to comment on this application, WE NEED YOUR COMMENTS BACK BY: JUNE 26, 2002. You may use the space provided below or attach a separate letter to return your comments. If you are unable to respond by the above date, please phone the staff contact noted above with your comments and confirm your comments in writing as soon as possible. If you have any questions, contact the Tigard Planning Division, 13125 SW Hall Boulevard, Tigard, OR 97223. PLEASE CHECK THE FOLLOWING ITEMS THAT APPLY: We have reviewed the proposal and have no objections to it. Please contact of our office. Please refer to the enclosed letter. Written comments provided below: — d Iz- ( « ,.k 5(6 c C S – rI ) %'�- t vr•i 25- S�ir�s 71 ! ves-f/000,,s +- a I> P ceccrss ;_blc 19r U C /1 Name & Number of Person Commenting: . 46, REQUEST FOR COMMENTS CIT OFTIdARD Community(Development Shaping Better Community DATE: June 12,2002 _ �u -! eq- 14v i'7i7 ./ TO: Barbara Shields,Long Range Planning Manager — ✓ � FROM: City of Tigard Planning Division — . uG tf STAFF CONTACT: Brad Kilby,Associate Planner[x24341 Phone: [5031639-4111/Fax: 15031684-7291 SITE DEVELOPMENT REVIEW MDR]2002-00006 IT ROTH OFFICE BUILDING REQUEST: The applicant is requesting Site Development Review approval for the construction of a two- story, 7,634 square foot office building in the Tigard Triangle. The property is 17,866 square feet in size. LOCATION: The property is located on the corner of SW 68th Avenue and SW Beveland Street. WCTM 2S101AA, Tax Lots 8300, 8500, 8600 and 8700. ZONE: MUE: Mixed-Use Employment. The MUE zoning district is designed to apply to a majority of the land within the Tigard Triangle, a regional mixed-use employment district bounded by Pacific Highway (Hwy. 99), Highway 217 and 1-5. This zoning district permits a wide range of uses including major retail goods and services, business/professional offices, civic uses and housing; the latter includes multi-family housing at a maximum density of 25 units/acre, equivalent to the R-25 zoning district. APPLICABLE REVIEW CRITERIA: Community Development Code Chapters 18.360, 18.390, 18.520, 18.620, 18.705, 18.725, 18.745, 18.755, 18.765, 18.780, 18.790, 18.795 and 18.810. Attached are the Site Plan, Vicinity Map and Applicant's Materials for your review. From information supplied by various departments and agencies and from other information available to our staff, a report and recommendation will be prepared and a decision will be rendered on the proposal in the near future. If you wish to comment on this application, WE NEED YOUR COMMENTS BACK BY: JUNE 26, 2002. You may use the space provided below or attach a separate letter to return your comments. If you are unable to respond by the above date, please phone the staff contact noted above with your comments and confirm your comments in writing as soon as possible. If you have any questions, contact the Tigard Planning Division, 13125 SW Hall Boulevard, Tigard, OR 97223. PL ASE CHECK THE FOLLOWING ITEMS THAT APPLY: We have Please contact d the proposal and have no objections to it. V�oQpNN�Nc1 of our office. Please refer to the enclosed letter. P-6\ ;,j7,Written comments provided below: J\P\ 10 Name & Number of Person Commenting: • 1 REQUEST FOR COMMENTS TIOARD Community Development Shaping A Better Community DATE: tune 12,2002 RErvFDP�NwNG 2Afi" ---,Tualatin Valley Water District Administrative Offices JUN 1 2, 00, FROM: City of Tigard Planning Dlolsian C1Ty r,GARD STAFF CONTACT: Brad Kiiby,Associate Planner(x2434) Phone: (503)639-4171/Fax: 1503)684-1291 SITE DEVELOPMENT REVIEW[SORT 2002-00006 IT ROTH OFFICE BUILDING < REQUEST: The applicant is requesting Site Development Review approval for the construction of a two- story, 7,634 square foot office building in the Tigard Triangle. The property is 17,866 square feet in size. LOCATION: The property is located on the corner of SW 68th Avenue and SW Beveland Street. WCTM 2S101AA, Tax Lots 8300, 8500, 8600 and 8700. ZONE: MUE: Mixed-Use Employment. The MUE zoning district is designed to apply to a majority of the land within the Tigard Triangle, a regional mixed-use employment district bounded by Pacific Highway (Hwy. 99), Highway 217 and 1-5. This zoning district permits a wide range of uses including major retail goods and services, business/professional offices, civic uses and housing; the latter includes multi-family housing at a maximum density of 25 units/acre, equivalent to the R-25 zoning district. APPLICABLE REVIEW CRITERIA: Community Development Code Chapters 18.360, 18.390, 18.520, 18.620, 18.705, 18.725, 18.745, 18.755, 18.765, 18.780, 18.790, 18.795 and 18.810. Attached are the Site Plan, Vicinity Map and Applicant's Materials for your review. From information supplied by various departments and agencies and from other inform.at' ble to our staff, a report and recommendation will be prepared and a decision will be rendered on th oposal in ar future. If you wish to comment on this application, WE NEED YOUR COMMENTS BACK : JUNE 26, 2002. ou may use the space provided below or attach a separate letter to return your comments. If ou are unab soond by the above date, please phone the staff contact noted above with your comments and contirm your comments in writing as soon as possible. If you have any questions, contact the Tigard Planning Division, 13125 SW Hall Boulevard, Tigard, OR 97223. PLEASE CHEC.... THE FOLLOWING ITEMS THAT APPLY: We have reviewed the proposal and have no objections to it. of our office. Please contact Please refer to the enclosed letter. Written comments provided below: • Er4sT / l ) g." Alc /Z Q-s 1--,-5 Te-G) �J I r w?#4 -r4-r E lotus^ —rte • T3 / " w rt-rW.4. `ttE"7 2 A�Aee, T- 7r JiJ G7 ' c"Z (.t) CST D r �& c�>D A c J ,1 Vec/_6 4f V fit' 5th-,2A-r14 Name & Number of Person Commenting: (. !7 0 Z 10012 91sII21d3NI9AId UMA.L 9860 T65 COS XVd 9£:OT NOW ZO/LT/90 IMPACT STATEMENT TRIANGLE VIEW PLACE Purpose The purpose of the Impact Study is to review existing public facilities and address any proposed modifications to these that will help mitigate the proportionate project impacts that will likely occur as a result of development. All necessary facilities for serving this site are currently in place in SW 68th' SW 69th Avenues and Beveland Street and are be constructed to serve this site. The transportation system, storm water, sanitary, water and other private utilities are all available and adequate in the immediate vicinity of the subject property. A detailed traffic report was prepared by Lancaster Engineering. Transportation System SW 68th, 69th, and Beveland Streets are all existing 60 foot right-of-ways. The existiig 32 foot width with curbs and sidewalks will accommodate this development's increase in traffic. We expect no adverse impacts to the current capacity of these streets. Drainage Systems The proposed drainage system will be collected via a piped system and be treated Dy a water quality and detention facility. The designs will be in accordance with the standards set up by Clean Water Services. The treated water will then be released to the existing storm drain line in SW 69th Avenue. Detention will be required for this site based on Standards of the City of Tigard. Detention will be accommodated by a in-ground tank. Water Systems There is an existing 12-inch water line in SW 69th and .0 h in SW 68th We are proposing to connect to the line in SW 68th , this line wi pply more than adequate flow and pressure for the proposed domestic and fire flows to the proposed offi et complex. c,c4 ..T-. WOrcE `Jv) Sanitary Sewer System Sanitary sewer service is available in SW 68th and SW 69th . We are proposing to use the existing system in SW 69tH N:\CLER\Working\05-02\4287.1 Impact Statement.doc 700 ONIfIddNION3 QMA,L 9860 T6S CO S XVd LE:OT NON ZO/LT/90 REQUEST FOR COMMENTS C,of IOARD Community(Development Shaping A cBetter Community DATE: lune 12,2002 TO: Dennis Koellermeier,Operations Manager/Water Department FROM: City of Tigard Planning Division STAFF CONTACT: Brad Kilhy,Associate Planner(x2434) Phone: [5031639-4111/Fax: (5031 684-1291 SITE DEVELOPMENT REVIEW[SDR)2002-00006 .- IT ROTH OFFICE BUILDING REQUEST: The applicant is requesting Site Development Review approval for the construction of a two- story, 7,634 square foot office building in the Tigard Triangle. The property is 17,866 square feet in size. LOCATION: The property is located on the corner of SW 68th Avenue and SW Beveland Street. WCTM 2S101AA, Tax Lots 8300, 8500, 8600 and 8700. ZONE: MUE: Mixed-Use Employment. The MUE zoning district is designed to apply to a majority of the land within the Tigard Triangle, a regional mixed-use employment district bounded by Pacific Highway (Hwy. 99), Highway 217 and 1-5. This zoning district permits a wide range of uses including major retail goods and services, business/professional offices, civic uses and housing; the latter includes multi-family housing at a maximum density of 25 units/acre, equivalent to the R-25 zoning district. APPLICABLE REVIEW CRITERIA: Community Development Code Chapters 18.360, 18.390, 18.520, 18.620, 18.705, 18.725, 18.745, 18.755, 18.765, 18.780, 18.790, 18.795 and 18.810. Attached are the Site Plan, Vicinity Map and Applicant's Materials for your review. From information supplied by various departments and agencies and from other information available to our staff, a report and recommendation will be prepared and a decision will be rendered on the proposal in the near future. If you wish to comment on this application, WE NEED YOUR COMMENTS BACK BY: JUNE 26, 2002. You may use the space provided below or attach a separate letter to return your comments. If you are unable to respond by the above date, please phone the staff contact noted above with your comments and confirm your comments in writing as soon as possible. If you have any questions, contact the Tigard Planning Division, 13125 SW Hall Boulevard, Tigard, OR 97223. PLEASE CHECK THE FOLLOWING ITEMS THAT APPLY: We have reviewed the proposal and have no objections to it. Please contact of our office. Please refer to the enclosed letter. Written comments provided below: Name & Number of Person Commenting:--R_s Dean -- ••. IYlvvll 1 Imoi II ,ilrimil .,:c.I. SW DOUGLAS DR CITY of TIGARD GEOGRAPHIC INFORMATION SYSTEM I VICINITY MAP Q� SDR2002-00006 ELMHURST ST N JT ROTH OFFICE `° , , N BUILDING Mir il I-i •Y 11111<> FRANKLIN ST Polo al RP.14111211.P' ., W� v RO ep, BEVELAND ST \\\ ` �y5 �< "��Or Inv BUL:1`Tf'Rp; QT ,d H6NIfA._.2. C 1111 Z N I Q , GONZAGA i Tigard Area Map i ST 111 �ir III num ` CD NA 0 100 200 300 400 Feel _ ., SW $ g 1"�324 feet m HAMPTON ST lii City of Tigard Information on this map is for general location only and ■ �— should be verified with the Development Services Division. 13125 SW Hell Blvd • ■1 I SW PAMEI Ti(503)639.41223 http:/NAYw.ci.ligard.onus Community Development Plot date:Jun 11,2002;C:lmagic\MAGIC03.APR i "° / / / VW m / V1 Ifh4. i 1-; Fe . / UJ 7� EXISTING PARKING 1 \EXIST PARKING I t LANDSCAPING '` I 1 VISUAL TRASH ENCLOSE I \/ AREA CLEARENCE LJ I W.* '0'4 ,, MN' 1 u.. ....-■-■■■■• .+-' •uprWrilip- I=== ACT SPAC-S•9-1' r(10. BIKE PAR G 4-9TANDARD 9P,'Lw 4;1 h i tWS _t� �i�c " W ,- .--kor /dr i �� W sTR�w uwrroii d 0 >__ en_ F Q IC I, I° R 1_ b J • ' ao o• \— 0 0 BUILDING �.42 ' �, b ., O «r ..N . MAIN FLR 3652. SOFT. .. 4 O A 2NDIFLR 7634. SOFT. I rg.,- S- PACT PAC C,S• -I' 2 STAND i,.. SP •ES 0 12'-0' _ J1 EXIS CITY •IDEWALIG- I Iy Iy 71 t �A ad ,l / WN' j, 4.N' ' t,•i' y W..• y I ,4.0 , Ir ry Tv/ / rr m111.TM...,.W..T ,,. SW BEVELAND STREE Nii...... .. CITY OF TIGARD SDR2002-00006 IL CITY OF O A AD SITE PLAN N ROTH OFFICE BUILDING (Map is not to scale) PRELIMINARY DErE/V NgRY r/0NAN D wgrE RQUAC.I TYCaC.C FOR �/Lq PONS NS NGLE VIEW PLACE r�s, R1 VV, fors V , sEcr/o �0, 85p0 N1M C/rY F/` , 8600 87 E * SOR Op 2002-000 06 14, 0s ' 2002 Cam aged by.• pass 6564 SE Lake Road 9 ukie Road 05 /v 503/653-9093 Oregon 97266 No. 428 1 �E va P�NN1P rIGARD NG/NFFRING GENERAL The purpose of these calculations are to support and demonstrate compliance with the Water Quality and Detention requirements for this proposed commercial development in the City of Tigard. WATER QUALITY CALCULATIONS Site Impervious Area Total Lot Area = 17,866 S.F. 85% = 15,186 S.F. = 0.35 acres impervious 15% = = 0.06 acres pervious Using 1/3 of a 2-year storm as basis for determining the required flow to represent the first flush from the site. With the King County Surface Water software it was determined that the peak flow for the above event is 0.08 cfs. This project proposes two storm water management catch basins each of which is capable of processing 0.033 ft3/sec. These devices have an internal overflow which will allow higher storms to by-pass the system. The roof water can be directed through the catch basins to process the total impervious area. PRE-DEVELOPED Time of Concentration Sheet Flow 200 ft L = 200 NS= 0.20 P2 = 2.5 in So= 0.03 T1 = 0.42((hs)(L))0 8 = 0.42 (0.20)(200))0.8 (P2)°.5 (So) .a (2.5) .5 (0.43)0.4 = 20.6 minutes Pre-developed 2- year Peak Flow C = 0.30 (unimproved) i = 0.81 in/hr at T = 20.6 minutes A = 0.41 acres Q = CiA = (0.30)(0.81)(0.41) = 0.10 cfs Developed Site C = 0.85 i = 2.49 A = 0.41 Q = CiA = (0.85)(2.49)(0.41) = 0.87 cfs From the determination of required detention work sheet the required volume is 528 ft3. Using a 25-year developed and 2-year pre-developed release rate. Tank Size Volume = rrR2L Length = Volume TrR2L Assume 36" 0 Pipe L = 528 = 75ft Tr(2.25) References 1. Design and Construction Standards for Sanitary Sewer and Surface Water Management by Unified Sewerage Agency, dated July 1996. 2. Oregon Department of Transportation Highway Division Hydraulics Manual, prepared by the Hydraulics Unit, January 1990. 3. Surface Water Quality Facilities Technical Guidance Handbook for Portland, Lake Oswego, Clackamas County, and Unified Sewerage Agency, by Brown and Caldwell Consultants, dated August 1991. DETERMINATION OF REQUIRED DETENTION STORAGE 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 TIME, MIN. CA, ACRES RAIN INTEN. INFLOW RATE INFLOW VOL. OUTFLOW RATE OUTFLOW VOL. REQ. STOR. in/hr cfs cu. ft. cfs cu. ft. cu. ft. 5 0.35 2.45 0.86 258 0.10 30 228 6 0.35 2.30 0.81 292 0.10 36 _ 256 7 0.35 2.20 0.77 323 0.10 42 881 8 0.35 2.10 0.74 355 0.10 48 307 9 0.35 2.00 0.7 378 0.10 54 324 10 0.35 1.90 0.67 402 0.10 60 342 15 0.35 1.60 0.56 504 0.10 90 414 20 0.35 1.40 0.49 588 0.10 120 468 25 0.35 1.23 0.43 645 0.10 150 495 30 0.35 1.10 0.39 702 0.10 180 522 35 0.35 1.00 0.35 735 0.10 210 525 40 0.35 0.09 0.32 768 0.10 240 528 it 45 0.35 0.84 0.29 783 0.10 270 513 50 0.35 0.79 0.28 840 0.10 300 627 Table 2.1 RUNOFF COEFFICIENTS FOR THE RATIONAL METHOD ROLLING HILLY FLAT 2% - 10% OVER 10% Pavement & Roofs 0.90 0.90 0.90 Earth Shoulders 0.50 0.50 0.50 Drives & Walks 0.75 0.80 0.85 Gravel Pavement 0.50 0.55 0.60 City Business Areas 0.80 0.85 0.85 Apartment Dwelling Areas 0.50 0.60 0.70 Light Residential : 1 to 3 units/ac. 0.35 0.40 0.45 Normal Residential : 3 to 6 units/ac. 0.50 0.55 0.60 Dense Residential : 6 to 15 units/ac. 0.70 0.75 0.80 Lawns 0.17 0.22 0.35 Grass Shoulders 0.25 0.25 0.25 Side Slopes, Earth 0.60 0.60 0.60 Side Slopes, Turf 0.30 0.30 0.30 Median Areas, Turf 0.25 0.30 0.30 Cultivated Land, Clay & Loam 0.50 0.55 0.60 Cultivated Land, Sand & Gravel 0.25 0.30 0.35 Industrial Areas, Light 0.50 0.70 0.80 Industrial Areas, Heavy 0.60 0.80 0.90 Parks & Cemeteries 0.10 0.15 0.25 Playgrounds 0.20 0.25 0.30 Woodland & Forests 0.10 0. 15 0.20 Meadows & Pasture Land 0.25 0.30 0.35 Unimproved Areas 0.10 0.20 0.30 2.4.7.2 Rainfall Intensity "i" The rainfall intensity "i " indicates the severity of the rainfall . Rainfall intensity is related to the rainfall duration and the statistical recurrence interval of the design storm. In the rational method the rainfall intensity corresponding to a duration equal to the time of concentration (Sec. 2.4.7.3) is used to calculate the peak flow. The rainfall intensity can be selected from the appropriate intensity-duration-frequency (I-D-F) curve found in Appendix 2.A. 11 RAINFALL INTENSITY - DURATION - FREQUENCY CURVES 5.0 :::::=:1111111111IIiII11i;11;=��C:....::::::::11111=.11111:::::1:111:1III1111uI111IIII I 4.0 :: : :IIIIIIIIIIIIIIilI II iiii:::::::::::11111111111111::::1111111111111111 III IIII :11==== _= 1.....1:..:11 Zone 7 -------- -------- 1 .1..111:: -- 1=====__= .. 01:1.11.,,., ------ ... 1111 I 1 1=---------- 11 1111111I111l -------- .■ 11 111, 3.0 .--.T_ ----- ..I 1 IIII .------- 1 .....,ii:!•� ....i1I n1�..---- 111. i=11�=11'11�C�_C�iiC i. 11.111'i :!1lII11Iiac�......._ 11111 •■.....1111 111 1111 rarsz... 111 `11111 in... 1 11..1��......■■■•.OU.■u■■u 111 .111.1111 I 1 ��........ ■u■■■u.11 . ■.0■ A=•1 I■ N...1=1111111�����... ■..u.uuuul■ 1111111 I ��..... ■111111.1.1 •••1111111111118/W1111111111111:!Ill��-�..............1■....■11111 ■...■■.■■.■1■111111IU1 111 AIM.............■1■.11..11 1111 ■...■ ■11111111..!1111111111.��W\.■......11.111■11111111111.....111111111111111111 I 1��....■■■......11111•111111 ■..U.:•.11111111111:9111111∎\1•.0\.■■..11..1111111 111111....11■111111111111111 III I�1•M............uu1u 1111111 2.0 ■......11.:!11111111 11111-limmam.00mu .1.1111111111111111.....11u1111111111111I IIIII�mu...■......■■.1111111111111 ■11111.1 1111 1..!11) 1 I I\\. bz..b.s■= .111111111111 11 ....111111 1111111 I� III�E...■..........1111111111111 L ■11111111-:!1111 1111111!!II1i111I\018.\'1.■1i.11111111.1111111111111■11111111111111 1 1 III.1.•1..•.■■■11..-..1111111111111 D ■■1 11111111111...111111111.! 11■1■1•04 .1111■11:11111111111111111■1111111111111111111111 I IIIII INIIMI..■■..■■■1111111111111111111 O 1111111111111111111111-:!1111111!111 ■1••\21111�111101111111111111111111111111111111111 11 I I I!I! M ....■.■1■1111111111 111111111 L 11111111111111111111111111111..41101.■x.111101111:411111111111111111111111111111 I �.a..■■■■■11111111111 mum 11111111:;!11 111111 IIUIIosal ■ o ■11i�lli:coati 11111111111111111111 IIIII I I IIIII■■■■o■■■■ 111111111 11111 to IIIIIIIIIIIIIIi:!!II�IIIIII,II■■.��uI1:ip111�!Ih 111111IIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIlIIIIIIII IIIII�•�■■■■u■:111111111 minim 0 111111111111111111111ii01111uu110111 !1 1111:!111'IulIIi21111111111111111111111111111111111•11111111111111111i11.11 O 1.0 111111111 111111111111111111111\2\r11111i:1111:!11111i=111 ;111!1111111111111111111111111■ 11■1111111111111111111111111, 0.9 _- __====mac .... --- a-==-� .............. =======---- .. :: -- - .! 11;.�'C..' l-:-R.. 1...1{iC--.E-- Q ..::: 0.8 :::::::::::CPS.C.-- G .. ..1...:?i 1 m�CC::C: i.• •.. 1111•.11:1111=C�OC.C... 1:'1 -.1 1 ■=_- 111.........e e� 1.1.1 4 _ V• ....... .NI 1111 ---- ■ .._ ..111.:1 ::1:�•1 -------... .. ... ... ..------- :. ,.. ...I� If.---------� �' ....Z C 11.'1111'1----- .:I ..1 ■.Le 111-1„:t11'''111i1'�------...= C 11.1 w •------ ... .�.------... 1. 0.6 ... ... .. .. ---..----. . .. .1. .. .. .1 1 ---- ■.. .1111111111111 t-- ..3 ... 111111111111111=====.■-._ . .I=.11i...11E �,.II..1e111111.1I1i' �.4�..0-� . •...... ■1. . .. 1111 111 -���.. ■..■ ...j 1.1.. 1 11 t�� �M■■ QC Z 111.1.1- ��..... i i1.1■.■=■_� �■1...1. 11111..�����... i 1111 11nuuu111M�..... 111■.■■■■■ 11.• 111111..111 w►��.M� ■n■ uuu.1 -- 0.5 ■■ ■■ ��.... 111 1111.1► = .•111111 1:n1111■.►.��..� save 11111 11 ••■■..■.■1..11111111111 IIIImmom......■..■■..■■..11..111111■..1 1.U.11u1 !1111 II 1/.1�m.a...eu..■■.....1.1. u1111III -I ■.••..0. .1 1111111111 1 Iu1���...■■■.■.aum1 110/111■.■ 01 ■1 1 11 1.! II 111 11 ��►1� ■.C�e..U11■11111111111 ■...■■.111.1 /111111111 11111�M�....■....■■...1.■I■..III1.....:.SIMI 1II1111101�1 IM�u.t.� .....��1.1.1II1111I1 Q 0.4 ■...■111111111 111111111iii111Im���...■......■111111 111111111...1111111.111111111111.IlIII..��\.\C0.a���:��n1/1111111111 100 Yr. Z -- -....� ._. :. 50 Yr. ------ . 1111---..,---...111,:.A.∎∎•o...l..-'.u: a 1:111------.... =1....----- ,..i.......:91"'.I25 Yr. CC 0.3 -..--- .11. -.. ------ 1.1- - 11..- i --. 1.1..����..... ''- ��=... I 111 1111111 MMM■... - 8111 i ���......■ .. 11 tun n....,...■.■o► u .::e ........ 11111 ■■■■IU11111 11111 I�NN...I0 :•■. ■■1 10 Yr. :C::::::111111111111111111 1111_::::6IIIIM ::: REQUEST FOR COMMENTS CITY OF TIGARD Community Development Shaping A(Better Community DATE: June 12,2002 TO: ), ,(1pItn Roy,Property Manager/Public Works Department FROM: City of Tigard Planning Division STAFF CONTACT: Brad Kilby,Associate Planner[x24341 Phone: 1503)639-4111/Fax: 1503)684-1291 SITE DEVELOPMENT REVIEW ISDRI 2002-00006 1T ROTH OFFICE BUILDING REQUEST: The applicant is requesting Site Development Review approval for the construction of a two- story, 7,634 square foot office building in the Tigard Triangle. The property is 17,866 square feet in size. LOCATION: The property is located on the corner of SW 68th Avenue and SW Beveland Street. WCTM 2S101AA, Tax Lots 8300, 8500, 8600 and 8700. ZONE: MUE: Mixed-Use Employment. The MUE zoning district is designed to apply to a majority of the land within the Tigard Triangle, a regional mixed-use employment district bounded by Pacific Highway (Hwy. 99), Highway 217 and 1-5. This zoning district permits a wide range of uses including major retail goods and services, business/professional offices, civic uses and housing; the latter includes multi-family housing at a maximum density of 25 units/acre, equivalent to the R-25 zoning district. APPLICABLE REVIEW CRITERIA: Community Development Code Chapters 18.360, 18.390, 18.520, 18.620, 18.705, 18.725, 18.745, 18.755, 18.765, 18.780, 18.790, 18.795 and 18.810. Attached are the Site Plan, Vicinity Map and Applicant's Materials for your review. From information supplied by various departments and agencies and from other information available to our staff, a report and recommendation will be prepared and a decision will be rendered on the proposal in the near future. If you wish to comment on this application, WE NEED YOUR COMMENTS BACK BY: JUNE 26, 2002. You may use the space provided below or attach a separate letter to return your comments. If you are unable to respond by the above date, please phone the staff contact noted above with your comments and confirm your comments in writing as soon as possible. If you have any questions, contact the Tigard Planning Division, 13125 SW Hall Boulevard, Tigard, OR 97223. PLEfrSE CHECK THE FOLLOWING ITEMS THAT APPLY: / We have reviewed the proposal and have no objections to it. Please contact of our office. Please refer to the enclosed letter. Written comments provided below: Name & Number of Person Commenting: _ ... ..•Ilvl..vif, of I CITY of I II GEOGRAPHIC IN FORY ATIOX SYSTEM SW DOUGLAS DR I VICINITY MAP II /7— aill w 1M 1 w < IIISDR2002-00006 II ELMHURST ST = JT ROTH OFFICE `� a BUILDING J w (D 1.11 h NIL4 < FRANKLIN ST �� } Ra F D ///\--` ,,,I ' RO 61111111111 BEVELAND ST :` —� • _< .ai mtr, se 9UL�ffr',.ROi t R! RONITA�0 Q f —� N ` 9E�F�Np RD. DURHAM 'S RD .,1 I I 0 r,11111 GONZAGA ST Tigard Area Map 111111 i El N c� 0 100 200 300 400 Feet Miliii co S Y V ; t"=324 feet n HAMPTON ST 414 City of Tigard \1 Information on this map is for general location only and I. should be verified with the Development Services Division. 13125 SW Hall Blvd '— i Tigard,OR 97223 SW FAME (503)639-4177 hltp:/MvAV.ci.tigard.or.us Community Development Plot date:Jun 11,2002;C:\magic\MAGIC03.APR we or ray it IIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIrIIIIMIFIMIIIIMIIIMIIIIIIIIz U \ EXISTING PARKIN Ca 1 I n EXIST PARKING I • LANDSCAPING \ .\/L IL VISUAL pi I.� TRASH ENCLOSEOI I.1 b �. � AREARENCE •, .* • .. 5- A. SPAC • --I' 1�' BIKE PAR G 4-STANDARD SP 4`�� h MiLl It Z jai ` W .« Q y �� a Y ..T. hl j.Q P A I 0 O " R a 1_ i CO = CIAO o• I o a I BUILDING `� k i G> p m N PT. MAIN FLR 3652. SOFT. MT. O A 2ND FLR 34182. SOFT. Vf I 7634. SOFT. J.1 n S- • PAC - -.s• -I' 2 STAND -° SP •ES•12'-0' ==.c=1A11=killh__. r___ . AAM--Milk /—i Ha MUM n�n� )101°V ) /� �\ '�ill• EXIS CITY %IDEINALK — I 4/(\t„.‘,.. ....4. j, ), 24.-e, )01,-6. j, 2‹.:±.ra eur MER■a�T w- SW BEVELAND STREE CITY CITY OF TIGARD t SDR2002-00006 Of SITE PLAN N ROTH OFFICE BUILDING (Map is not to scale) 4101,0, REQUEST FOR COMMENTS CITY YOFTIGARD Community(Development Shaping A Better Community DATE: June 12,2002 TO: Jim Wolf,Tigard Police Department Crime Prevention Officer FROM: City of Tigard Planning Division STAFF CONTACT: Brad Kilby,Associate Planner(x2434) Phone: [5031 639-4111/Fax: [5031684-1291 SITE DEVELOPMENT REVIEW[SDRI 2002-00006 ,- 1T ROTH OFFICE BUILDING REQUEST: The applicant is requesting Site Development Review approval for the construction of a two- story, 7,634 square foot office building in the Tigard Triangle. The property is 17,866 square feet in size. LOCATION: The property is located on the corner of SW 68th Avenue and SW Beveland Street. WCTM 2S101AA, Tax Lots 8300, 8500, 8600 and 8700. ZONE: MUE: Mixed-Use Employment. The MUE zoning district is designed to apply to a majority of the land within the Tigard Triangle, a regional mixed-use employment district bounded by Pacific Highway (Hwy. 99), Highway 217 and 1-5. This zoning district permits a wide range of uses including major retail goods and services, business/professional offices, civic uses and housing; the latter includes multi-family housing at a maximum density of 25 units/acre, equivalent to the R-25 zoning district. APPLICABLE REVIEW CRITERIA: Community Development Code Chapters 18.360, 18.390, 18.520, 18.620, 18.705, 18.725, 18.745, 18.755, 18.765, 18.780, 18.790, 18.795 and 18.810. Attached are the Site Plan, Vicinity Map and Applicant's Materials for your review. From information supplied by various departments and agencies and from other information available to our staff, a report and recommendation will be prepared and a decision will be rendered on the proposal in the near future. If you wish to comment on this application, WE NEED YOUR COMMENTS BACK BY: JUNE 26, 2002. You may use the space provided below or attach a separate letter to return your comments. If you are unable to respond by the above date, please phone the staff contact noted above with your comments and confirm your comments in writing as soon as possible. If you have any questions, contact the Tigard Planning Division, 13125 SW Hall Boulevard, Tigard, OR 97223. PLEASE CHECK THE FOLLOWING ITEMS THAT APPLY: We have reviewed the proposal and have no objections to it. Please contact of our office. Please refer to the enclosed letter. Written comments provided below: Name & Number of Person Commenting: 1 M W6\ c ZS t UCITYofTIGARD NTEM ammils OE000APN10 INFORMATION $V SW DOUGLAS DR 'No Is will<LU Mil ' I VICINITY MAP ¢� SDR2002-00006 ME ELMHURST ST N a JT ROTH OFFICE els �= 3 BUILDING 1 N2 killiFirillin Lij w' bite r RD e 111101-17 FRANKLIN ST . au Ai , , BEVELAND ST \\\ r< 1 �.. Ihiallik 11111■ 1 BULi S: r II 6oNITA�9_ 111 -' '-}:.INI , `j s . II N ` . �F ENO RD _Y. NH • R ■ i' I 11111 GONZAGA ST . Tigard Nee Map • N. II2`� •• 0 100 200 300 400 Feet SW 11111 t'=324 feet HAMPTON ST IIII - -EVIL i)' . City of Tigard Information on this map Is for general location only and 11 a should be verified with the Development Services Division. 13125 SW Hall Blvd Tigard,OR 97223 e SW PAME (503)639-4171 http://wmv.cl.tigard.or.us Community Development Plot date:Jun 11,2002;C:lmagicWIAGIC03.APR I ter / or tlr / Y l' .1 le / / / a Ili , -Aria.,"‘ 7—') EXISTING PARKING N EXIST PARKING I $ LANDSCAPING r 1 I VISUAL L�I TRASH ENCLOSED I w AREA J I W-Mt W.,K' Y ir..• I .5: :::1 RE 00, AC SPAC-91 9•P r.__I' / BIKE PAR G 4-STANDARD SP4%r4 d eNee ` .—\ LLI '' k �`'� b ® \-- — ,' '-I ...\W ' Li uwr c., ` W Q II 0 *t 'Jo BUILDING • � Y 1 } N b m 0 co. MAIN FLR 3652. SOFT. De. 9 2ND IFLR X634. SOFT. — !- -'PAC SPAC-.9 I -1' 2 STAND .., SP • c I.MN AM gun u• . \ \ / EXISTh CITY '•IDEWALI�— ❑ I / / (w • m,r,rn,rc.awr a SW BEVELAND STREE 4 CITY OF TIGARD f SDR2002-00006 °m°' .QO SITE PLAN N ROTH OFFICE BUILDING (Map is not to scale) LANCASTER engineering May 21, 2002 Tim Roth 12600 SW 72nd Avenue, Suite 200 Tigard, OR 97 RE: Triangle View Place traffic report Dear Mr. Roth: This letter report addresses the anticipated trip generation, distribution and assignment of the office development proposed on the north side of Beveland Road between 68th Avenue and 69th Avenue in Tigard, Oregon. The development proposes a 7,634 square foot office building with accesses to 68th Avenue and 69th Avenue. Both accesses will be shared with buildings to the north of the site. Trip Generation To estimate the number of trips that will be generated by the 7,634 square foot pro- posed office building, trip rates from TRIP GENERATION, Sixth Edition, published by the In- stitute of Transportation Engineers (ITE) were used. The trip rates used were for land-use code 710, General Office Building. The average rates were used, since the fitted curve equation shows a Y-intercept of 38 weekday trips and 79 evening peak hour trips. That is, according to the fitted curve equation, even a very small office building will generate a minimum of 79 eve- ning peak hour trips. For the 7,634 square foot office building, the calculations indicate that there will be an estimated total of 12 trips generated during the morning peak hour. Of these, 11 will be enter- ing and 1 will be exiting the site. The evening peak hour will have an estimated 11 trips, of which 2 are entering and 9 are exiting the site. The daily trip generation will be 84 trips, with half entering and half exiting the site. Union Station, Suite 206•800 NW 6th Avenue•Portland,OR 97209•Phone 503.248.0313•Fax 503.248.9251 Tim Roth May 21, 2002 Page 2 of 2 Trip Distribution and Assignment The directional distribution of the trips generated by the proposed land use was esti- mated from the nature of the land use, the nearby land uses, and the primary routes which will serve the site. All traffic destined to and from the south on the I-5 Freeway was assumed to use the ORE 217 interchange with 72nd Avenue. It was assumed that the majority of the trips would use 72nd Avenue with some trips using 68th Avenue to get to ORE 217. Of the traffic to and from the north, it was assumed that some of the trips would take Dartmouth to ORE 217 and the rest of the trips were split between the 72°d Avenue route to Highway 99W and Dartmouth Street route to the I-5 Freeway. Although the site is located between 68th Avenue and 69th Ave- nue, it was assumed a slight majority of the trips would use 68th Avenue since access onto 68th Avenue appears to be more convenient for the internal traffic flow than access onto 69th Ave- nue. Traffic flow diagrams showing the existing traffic, site trip distribution, site trip as- signment, and existing plus site-generated traffic are attached as an appendix to this letter re- port. If there are any questions regarding this letter or if we can be of any further assistance, please do not hesitate to give us a call. Yours truly, E *�. �vR C, 1�A s�MP�1�NJ Catriona Sumra Engineering Technician attachment: Technical Appendix ‘,%r`O PROFess �� ,AGiNE�9 � OREGON ODE. moo- r EXPIRES: I z 41/2etz TECHNICAL APPENDIX TRIP GENERA Ti ON CALCULATIONS La'Td Use.' General d use Code.- �1 G Building Vasa ar1able, 10 wee Ildinb' b!e Value O Sq Ft Gross Fl Area AIVI PEAR'1100? T'r/'Rate: 1 56 Directional Enter PM pEAX H� Distribution UR Trip Ends on 88% 129 Total �pRar ' 1.49 Directional ftialit Distribution 17% Total Tipp Ends 83 WEEKDAY T'1�'Fare• 11.01 Dire�tiOnal SAY Distribution SO% TrIP Rare.* Trip Ends SO% Total 0.98 �� Directional 8`1 Distribution S To 0% tal Sau, Trip Ends SO �e 7.RIP GENE*�T/oN r `'. Sixth Edition ON (Ow-0 'C enN- (-2-3...4 --N <- 126 <1 4,4 \r-90 <1.1,4 \54 48-1‘ t'r 174-T tT14 410 ��� 443 PncNOrn 151-, �N 23-Q„ N- SW Dartmouth Street . --"<*: v .., C C ac .4c Q Q Q c r .c s n o V) PROJECT - SITE SW Beveland Road ,I No Scale le TRAFFIC VOLUMES Existing Conditions - PM Peak Hour 7VP1.dwg eI I �� n I IO *___:</ SW Dartmouth Street si- 10? l0% I 0 0 0 N 0 0 '61' V N o o o 3 C C C Y Q Q Q o_ t L_ -c cy O 0 N N (0 (0 V) v) v) PROJECT SITE SW Bevelond Road �I v�° °I o eio ,4 No Scale TRIP DISTRIBUTION Inbound & Outbound Percentages - PM Peak Hour NP1.dwg 00o F-0 coo �0 E-14,4 .F 0 E-IJ.y \F t 0-I' <-1TI> 0--1' Tr> 0—> ^^0 0-> -^0 o-1, o--I, SW Dartmouth Street sa a) C o o 3 C c C a) Y Q Q a. -0 L - c C N 0 0, co Q;) (00 V) V) V) V) PROJECT SITE SW Beveland Road 1+ No Scale le" TRAFFIC VOLUMES Site Trips PM Peak Hour NP1 dwg °N. t 50 `°"O 1- 101 c'CO'- X234 --N <- 126 FJ,I.L4 X90 Jj,y c55 48 �ITr> 174 <1Ir-> 410—> 2NIC) 443 ,(.3,;)�rn 151-1 N 23 N SW Dartmouth Street ' —.."<44t/ °' a) a) o C Y Q Q Q a. C t -c L N 0 m CO (/) (r) V) (f) PROJECT SITE SW Beveland Road No Scale le TRAFFIC VOLUMES Existing + Site Trips - PM Peak Hour NP1.dwg REQUEST FOR COMMENTS CITOF TI CITY RECEIVED PLANNING Community(Development ShapingA(Better Community JUN 1 2 2002 DATE: lune 12,2002 CITY CiE TiGARr) TO: Sherman Casper,Permit Coordinator/Community Development Department FROM: City of Tigard Planning Division STAFF CONTACT: Brad Kilby,Associate Planner(x2434) Phone: [503)639-4111/Fax: [503)684-1291 SITE DEVELOPMENT REVIEW MDR)2002-00006 IT ROTH OFFICE BUILDING REQUEST: The applicant is requesting Site Development Review approval for the construction of a two- story, 7,634 square foot office building in the Tigard Triangle. The property is 17,866 square feet in size. LOCATION: The property is located on the corner of SW 68th Avenue and SW Beveland Street. WCTM 2S101AA, Tax Lots 8300, 8500, 8600 and 8700. ZONE: MUE: Mixed-Use Employment. The MUE zoning district is designed to apply to a majority of the land within the Tigard Triangle, a regional mixed-use employment district bounded by Pacific Highway (Hwy. 99), Highway 217 and 1-5. This zoning district permits a wide range of uses including major retail goods and services, business/professional offices, civic uses and housing; the latter includes multi-family housing at a maximum density of 25 units/acre, equivalent to the R-25 zoning district. APPLICABLE REVIEW CRITERIA: Community Development Code Chapters 18.360, 18.390, 18.520, 18.620, 18.705, 18.725, 18.745, 18.755, 18.765, 18.780, 18.790, 18.795 and 18.810. Attached are the Site Plan, Vicinity Map and Applicant's Materials for your review. From information supplied by various departments and agencies and from other information available to our staff, a report and recommendation will be prepared and a decision will be rendered on the proposal in the near future. If you wish to comment on this application, WE NEED YOUR COMMENTS BACK BY: JUNE 26, 2002. You may use the space provided below or attach a separate letter to return your comments. If you are unable to respond by the above date, please phone the staff contact noted above with your comments and confirm your comments in writing as soon as possible. If you have any questions, contact the Tigard Planning Division, 13125 SW Hall Boulevard, Tigard, OR 97223. PLEASE CHECK THE FOLLOWING ITEMS THAT APPLY: We have reviewed the proposal and have no objections to it. Please contact of our office. Please refer to the enclosed letter. Written comments provided below: ///dcAr r 6 )0„,Ks Name & Number of Person Commenting: •V DATE: PLANS CHECK NO June 12, 2002 SDR2002-00006 PROJECT TITLE: JT Roth Office Building COUNTYWIDE TRAFFIC IMPACT FEE WORKSHEET APPLICANT: J.T. Roth (FOR NON-SINGLE FAMILY USES) MAILING ADDRESS: 12600 SW 72nd Ave. #200 . Nommommmil CITY/ZIP/PHONE: Portland / 97223 / (503)639-2639 TAX MAP NO.: 2S101AA8300,8500,8600,8700 SITES NO.ADDRESS: SW 68th & Beveland LAND USE CATEGORY RATE PER TRIP RESIDENTIAL $ 239.00 BUSINESS AND COMMERCIAL $ 60.00 This Estimate assumes Building application X OFFICE $ 220.00 after July 1, 2002 - INDUSTRIAL $230.00 - INSTITUTIONAL $ 99.00 PAYMENT METHOD: ' CASH/CHECK CREDIT B• ANCROFT(PROMISSORY NOTE) LAND USE CATEGORY DESCRIPTION OF USE WEEKDAY AVG. INSTITUTIONAL ONLY D• EFER TO OCCUPANCY 710A Office General TRIP RATE 16.31 WEEKEND AVG.TRIP RATE BASIS: The applicant proposes construction of a new 7,634 sq. ft. office building CALCULATIONS: TIF = Week day Avg. Trips X T.G.S.F. X Rate Per Trip $27,392 = 16.31 X 7,634 X $220 Transit Amt. = Projected Trip Rate X $18 PROJECT TRIP $2,250 = 125 X 18 GENERATION: 125 FEE: $27,392 FOR ACCOUNTING PURPOSES ONLY ADDITIONAL NOTES: No credits assumed ROAD AMT. $25,142 T• RANSIT AMT. $2,250 P• REPARED BY S.S. Casper I:TIFWKST.DOC (DST) EFF: 07-01-98 4061 REQUEST FOR COMMENTS C;OFTIOARD Community(Development ShapingA Better Community DATE: lune 12,2002 TO: PER ATTACHED FROM: City of Tigard Planning Division STAFF CONTACT: Brad Kilby,Associate Planner[x24341 Phone: [5031 639-4111/Fax: [5031 684-1291 SITE DEVELOPMENT REVIEW[SDR]2002-00006 - 1T ROTH OFFICE BUILDING r REQUEST: The applicant is requesting Site Development Review approval for the construction of a two- story, 7,634 square foot office building in the Tigard Triangle. The property is 17,866 square feet in size. LOCATION: The property is located on the corner of SW 68th Avenue and SW Beveland Street. WCTM 2S101AA, Tax Lots 8300, 8500, 8600 and 8700. ZONE: MUE: Mixed-Use Employment. The MUE zoning district is designed to apply to a majority of the land within the Tigard Triangle, a regional mixed-use employment district bounded by Pacific Highway (Hwy. 99), Highway 217 and 1-5. This zoning district permits a wide range of uses including major retail goods and services, business/professional offices, civic uses and housing; the latter includes multi-family housing at a maximum density of 25 units/acre, equivalent to the R-25 zoning district. APPLICABLE REVIEW CRITERIA: Community Development Code Chapters 18.360, 18.390, 18.520, 18.620, 18.705, 18.725, 18.745, 18.755, 18.765, 18.780, 18.790, 18.795 and 18.810. Attached are the Site Plan, Vicinity Map and Applicant's Materials for your review. From information supplied by various departments and agencies and from other information available to our staff, a report and recommendation will be prepared and a decision will be rendered on the proposal in the near future. If you wish to comment on this application, WE NEED YOUR COMMENTS BACK BY: JUNE 26, 2002. You may use the space provided below or attach a separate letter to return your comments. If you are unable to respond by the above date, please phone the staff contact noted above with your comments and confirm your comments in writing as soon as possible. If you have any questions, contact the Tigard Planning Division, 13125 SW Hall Boulevard, Tigard, OR 97223. PLEASE CHECK THE FOLLOWING ITEMS THAT APPLY: We have reviewed the proposal and have no objections to it. Please contact of our office. Please refer to the enclosed letter. Written comments provided below: Name & Number of Person Commenting: • CITY TIGARD REQUEST FOR Col =NTS NOTIFICATION LIST FOR LAND USE & COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT APPLICATIONS FILE NOS.: t )f)k )r,o . a.0 , FILE NAME: ■ K.()--; "' i� CITIZEN INVOLVEMENT TEAMS 14-DAY PENDING APPLICATION NOTICE TO CIT AREA: ❑Central list ❑South ❑West t Proposal Descrip.in Library CIT Book I CITY OFFICES VI,ONG RANGE PLANNING/Barbara Shields,Planning Mgr. _COMMUNITY DVLPMNT.DEPT./Planning-Engineering Techs. ZPOLICE DEPTJJim Wolf,Crime Prevention Officer UILDING DIVISION/Gary Lampella,Building Official ENGINEERING DEPT./Brian Rager,Dvlpmnt.Review Engineer WATER DEPT./Dennis Koellermeier,Operations Mgr. '\CITY ADMINISTRATION/Cathy Wheatley,City Recorder __PUBLIC WORKS/John Roy.Property Manager PUBLIC WORKS/Matt Stine.Urban Forester V LANNER—POST PROJECT SITE IF A PUBLIC HEARING ITEM-10 BUSINESS DAYS PRIOR TO THE PUBLIC HEARING.( .D./Sherman Casper,Permit Coord.(sorvcup re:TIF) SPECIAL DISTRICTS _ TUAL.HILLS PARK&REC.DIST.*_ZTUALATIN VALLEY FIRE&RESCUE ♦ TUALATIN VALLEY WATER DISTRICT* CLEANWATER SERVICES* Planning Manager Fire Marshall Administrative Office Lee Walker/SWM Program 15707 SW Walker Road Washington County Fire District PO Box 745 155 N.First Avenue Beaverton,OR 97006 (place in pick-up box) Beaverton,OR 97075 Hillsboro,OR 97124 LOCAL AND STATE JURISDICTIONS CITY OF BEAVERTON ill _ CITY OF TUALATIN * _OR.DEPT.OF FISH&WILDLIFE _OR.DIV.OF STATE LANDS Planning Manager Planning Manager 2501 SW First Avenue Jennifer Goodridge Irish Bunnell,Development Services PO Box 369 PO Box 59 775 Summer Street NE PO Box 4755 Tualatin,OR 97062 Portland,OR 97207 Salem,OR 97301-1279 Beaverton,OR 97076 OR.PUB.UTILITIES COMM. METRO-LAND USE&PLANNING * _OR.DEPT.OF GEO.&MINERAL IND. 550 Capitol Street NE CITY OF DURHAM * 600 NE Grand Avenue 800 NE Oregon Street,Suite 5 Salem,OR 97310-1380 City Manager Portland,OR 97232-2736 Portland,OR 97232 PO Box 23483 _ Bob Knight,Data Resource Center(ZCA) _US ARMY CORPS.OF ENG. Durham,OR 97281-3483 _ Paulette Allen,Growth Management Coordinator _OR.DEPT.OF LAND CONSERV.&DVLP. Kathryn Harris _ Mel Huie,GreenspacesCoordinator(CPA/ZOA) Larry French(Comp Plan Amendments Only) Routing CENWP-OP-G _CITY OF KING CITY * _ Jennifer Budhabhatti,Regional Planner(Wetlands) 635 Capitol Street NE,Suite 150 PO Box 2946 City Manager _ C.D.Manager,Growth Management Services Salem,OR 97301-2540 Portland,OR 97208-2946 15300 SW 116th Avenue King City,OR 97224 WASHINGTON COUNTY _ OR.DEPT.OF ENERGY)Powedines in Area) OREGON DEPT.OF TRANS.(ODOT) Dept.of Land Use&Transp. Bonneville Power Administration Aeronautics Division(Monopole Towers) 155 N.First Avenue _CITY OF LAKE OSWEGO * Routing TTRC-Attn: Renae Ferrera Tom Highland,Planning Suite 350,MS 13 Planning Director PO Box 3621 3040 25th Street,SE Hillsboro,OR 97124 PO Box 369 Portland,OR 97208-3621 Salem,OR 97310 Brent Curtis(CPA) Lake Oswego,OR 97034 Gregg Leion IcPA) _ OR.DEPT.OF ENVIRON.QUALITY(DEQ) ODOT,REGION 1 * Anne LaMountain(IGA URe) _CITY OF PORTLAND (Notify for Wetlands and Potential Environmental Impacts) .'Sonya Kazen,Development Review Coordinator Phil Healy(IGNURB) David Knowles,Planning Bureau Dir Regional Administrator Carl Toland, Right-of-Way Section(vacations) Steve Conway(General Apps.) Portland Building 106,Rm. 1002 2020 SW Fourth Avenue,Suite 400 123 NW Flanders _Sr.Cartographer IceAacclr.r„ 1120 SW Fifth Avenue Portland,OR 97201-4987 Portland,OR 97209-4037 _Jim Nims IzcA)MS 15 Portland,OR 97204 _Doria Mateja(ZCA)MS 14 WCCCA(911)(Monopole Towers) _ODOT,REGION 1 -DISTRICT 2A * Dave Austin Jane Estes,Permit Specialist 17911 NW Evergreen Parkway 5440 SW Westgate Drive,Suite 350 Beaverton,OR 97006 Portland.OR 97221-2414 UTILITY PROVIDERS AND SPECIAL AGENCIES PORTLAND WESTERN RJR,BURLINGTON NORTHERN/SANTA FE R/R,OREGON ELECTRIC RJR(Burlington Northern/Santa Fe R/R Predecessor) Robert I. Melbo,President&General Manager , 110 W. 10th Avenue Albany,OR 97321 _SOUTHERN PACIFIC TRANS.CO.R/R _METRO AREA COMMUNICATIONS _AT&T CABLE TRI-MET TRANSIT DVLPMT. Clifford C.Cabe,Construction Engineer Debra Palmer(Annexations Only) Pat McGann (If Project is Within'h Mile of A Transit Route) 5424 SE McLoughlin Boulevard Twin Oaks Technology Center 14200 SW Brigadoon Court Ben Baldwin,Project Planner Portland,OR 97232 1815 NW 169th Place,S-6020 Beaverton,OR 97005 710 NE Holladay Street Beaverton,OR 97006-4886 Portland,OR 97232 PORTLAND GENERAL ELECTRIC _NW NATURAL GAS COMPANY VERIZON QWEST COMMUNICATIONS Jim VanKleek,Svc.Design Consultant Scott Palmer,Engineering Coord. Ken Perdue,Engineering Jeri Cella,Engineering 9480 SW Boeckman Road 220 NW Second Avenue PO Box 1100 8021 SW Capitol Hill Rd,Rm 110 Wilsonville,OR 97070 Portland,OR 97209-3991 Beaverton,OR 97075-1100 Portland,OR 97219 _TIGARD/TUALATIN SCHOOL DIST.#23J_BEAVERTON SCHOOL DIST.#48 _ AT&T CABLE Ic,e,Eo1 HdUNo194N1 Marsha Butler,Administrative Offices Jan Youngquist,Demographics&Planning Dept. Diana Carpenter 6960 SW Sandburg Street 16550 SW Merlo Road 3500 SW Bond Street Tigard,OR 97223-8039 Beaverton,OR 97006-5152 Portland,OR 97232 * INDICATES AUTOMATIC NOTIFICATION IN COMPLIANCE WITH INTERGOVERNMENTAL AGREEMENT IF WITHIN 500' OF THE SUBJECT PROPERTY FOR ANY/ALL CITY PROJECTS(Project Planner Is Responsible For Indicating Parties To Notify). h:)patty\masters)Request For Comments Notification List 2.doc (Revised 8-Mar-02) MAILING RECORDS r AFFIDAVIT OF MAILING TYY`4' CITY OF TIGARD Community(Development Shaping Better Community I, Patricia G. Lunsford: being first duly sworn/affirm, on oath depose and say that I am a Senior Administrative Specialist for the City of7igar , Washington County, Oregon and that I served the following: (Chock Appropriate Box(s)Below) E3 NOTICE OF PENDING LAND USE APPLICATION FOR: SDR2002-00006/JT ROTH OFFICE BUILDING IAMENDED NOTICE (File No/Name Reference) ® City of Tigard Planning Director A copy of the said notice being hereto attached, marked Exhibit"A", and by reference made a part hereof, was mailed to each named person(s) at the address(s) shown on the attached list(s), marked Exhibit"B", and by reference made a part hereof, on lune 12,2002, and deposited in the United States Mail on lune 12,2002, postage prepaid. 7 v lt4 e../4.,'' L- rb A k_ (Person that Prepared otice) STATE OE EGON ) County of Wshington )ss. City of Tigard ) Subscribed and sworn/affirmed before me on the /3 " day of , 2002. OFFICIAL SEAL H DIANE M JELDERKS 4 -"% ' NOTARY PUBLIC-OREGON ' ' COMMISSION NO.326578 /1.-----" MY COMMISSION EXPIRES SEPT.07,2003 NOTARCI4LI ,EG My Commission Ex - 5: 7/7 63 �fM A . NOTICE TO MORTGAGEE, LIENHOLDER,VENDOR OR SELLER: THE TIGARD DEVELOPMENT CODE REQUIRES THAT IF YOU RECEIVE THIS NOTICE,IT SHALL BE PROMPTLY FORWARDED TO THE PURCHASER. NOTICE OF PENDING LAND USE APPLICATION SITE DEVELOPMENT REVIEW T CITY OF TI GARD Community<Deve(opment Shaping.4 Better Community DATE OF NOTICE: June 12, 2002 FILE NUMBER: SITE DEVELOPMENT REVIEW (SDR) 2002.00006 Type II Land Use Application FILE NAME: JT ROTH OFFICE BUILDING PROPOSAL: The applicant is requesting Site Development Review approval for the construction of a two-story, 7,634 square foot office building in the Tigard Triangle. The property is 17,866 square feet in size. ZONE: MUE: Mixed-Use Employment. The MUE zoning district is designed to apply to a majority of the land within the Tigard Triangle, a regional mixed-use employment district bounded by Pacific Highway (Hwy. 99), Highway 217 and 1-5. This zoning district permits a wide range of uses including major retail goods and services, business/professional offices, civic uses and housing; the latter includes multi-family housing at a maximum density of 25 units/acre, equivalent to the R-25 zoning district. APPLICABLE REVIEW CRITERIA: Community Development Code Chapters 18.360, 18.390, 18.520, 18.620, 18.705, 18.725, 18.745, 18.755, 18.765, 18.780, 18.790, 18.795 and 18.810. LOCATION: The property is located on the corner of SW 68th Avenue and SW Beveland Street. WCTM 2S101AA, Tax Lots 8300, 8500, 8600 and 8700. YOUR RIGHT TO PROVIDE WRITTEN COMMENTS: Prior to the City making any decision on the Application, you are hereby provided a fourteen (14) day period to submit written comments on the application to the City. THE FOURTEEN (14) DAY PERIOD ENDS AT 5:00 PM ON JUNE 26, 2002. All comments should be directed to Brad Kilby, Associate Planner in the Planning Division at the City of Tigard, 13125 SW Hall Boulevard, Tigard, Oregon 97223. You may reach the City of Tigard by telephone at (503) 639-4171. ALL COMMENTS MUST BE RECEIVED BY THE CITY OF TIGARD IN WRITING PRIOR TO 5:00 PM ON THE DATE SPECIFIED ABOVE IN ORDER FOR YOUR COMMENTS TO BE CONSIDERED IN THE DECISION MAKING PROCESS THE CITY OF TIGARD APPRECIATES RECEIVING COMMENTS AND VALUES YOUR INPUT. COMMENTS WILL BE CONSIDERED AND ADDRESSED WITHIN THE NOTICE OF DECISION. A DECISION ON THIS ISSUE IS TENTATIVELY SCHEDULED FOR JULY 19, 2002. IF YOU PROVIDE COMMENTS, YOU WILL BE SENT A COPY OF THE FULL DECISION ONCE IT HAS BEEN RENDERED. WRITTEN COMMENTS WILL BECOME A PART OF THE PERMANENT PUBLIC RECORD AND SHALL CONTAIN THE FOLLOWING INFORMATION: • Address the specific "Applicable Review Criteria" described in the section above or any other criteria believed to be applicable to this proposal; • Raise any issues and/or concerns believed to be important with sufficient evidence to allow the City to provide a response; • Comments that provide the basis for an appeal to the Tigard Hearings Officer must address the relevant approval criteria with sufficient specificity on that issue. Failure of any party to address the relevant approval criteria with sufficient specificity may preclude subsequent appeals to the Land Use Board of Appeals or Circuit Court on that issue. Specific findings directed at the relevant approval criteria are what constitute relevant evidence. AFTER THE 14 DAY COMMENT PERIOD CLOSES, THE DIRECTOR SHALL ISSUE A TYPE II ADMINISTRATIVE DECISION. THE DIRECTOR'S DECISION SHALL BE MAILED TO THE APPLICANT AND TO OWNERS OF RECORD OF PROPERTY LOCATED WITHIN 500 FEET OF THE SUBJECT SITE, AND TO ANYONE ELSE WHO SUBMITTED WRITTEN COMMENTS OR WHO IS OTHERWISE ENTITLED TO NOTICE. THE DIRECTOR'S DECISION SHALL ADDRESS ALL OF THE RELEVANT APPROVAL CRITERIA. BASED UPON THE CRITERIA AND THE FACTS CONTAINED WITHIN THE RECORD, THE DIRECTOR SHALL APPROVE, APPROVE WITH CONDITIONS OR DENY THE REQUESTED PERMIT OR ACTION. SUMMARY OF THE DECISION-MAKING PROCESS: . The application is accepted by the City . Notice is sent to property owners of record within 500 feet of the proposed development area allowing a 14-day written comment period. . The application is reviewed by City Staff and affected agencies. . City Staff issues a written decision. . Notice of the decision is sent to the Applicant and all owners or contract purchasers of record of the site; all owners of record of property located within 500 feet of the site, as shown on the most recent property tax assessment roll; any City-recognized neighborhood group whose boundaries include the site; and any governmental agency which is entitled to notice under an intergovernmental agreement entered into with the City which includes provision for such notice or anyone who is otherwise entitled to such notice. INFORMATION/EVIDENCE AVAILABLE FOR REVIEW: The application, written comments and supporting documents relied upon by the Director to make this decision are contained within the record and are available for public review at the City of Tigard Community Development Department. Copies of these items may be obtained at a cost of $.25 per page or the current rate charged for this service. Questions regarding this application should be directed to the Planning Staff indicated on the first page of this Notice under the section titled "Your Right to Provide Written Comments." f H I 1 ,C.'IV of IIGARD• 7 1 VICINITY MAP I ' x 111 w w ' SDR2002-00006 ELMHURST ST H I6 $ JT ritEr ' II ' 1 � ; ; BUILDING 1 a gigF:_:■K IN ST ati ii II1,111bani :a i :k imilai 72.16 N Q� a GONZAGA ST EEE c0 IIIIIII lermi SW t .,,. HAMPTON ST City of TipM bran.NOW Yr prr rr.+rr -----11\ Mwr°.rr i kIlig rwwr.ww. ■ �� mrwrwww nraa.ww r rrr rw.m 2S101AD-01600 2S101AA-09700 £XI1I► 68TH STREET INVESTORS LLC DANA MARK R Il s 12670 SW 68TH AVE STE 300 12585 SW 68TH AVE TIGARD,OR 97223 TIGARD,OR 97223 2S101AA-08100 2S101AA-08301 A&R LLC DEFOE CHARLES E JR& 12480 SW 68TH PKWY STE A MCGEE JUDITH A TIGARD,OR 97223 12455 SW 68TH AVE PORTLAND,OR 97223 2S101AB-02300 2S101AA-08200 BOLON DEAN N D OE CHARL . E JR& 4022 NE LADDINGTON CT MCG J ! H A PORTLAND,OR 97232 1245 : •;TH AVE Pi'TLAND, •- 97223 2S 101 AB-02200 2S 101 AD-00803 CASEY EDWARD L JR&JOANNE F EQUITY GROUP FUND 1 LLC 7085 SW BEVELAND RD BY KURT DALBEY PORTLAND,OR 97223 7125 SW HAMPTON PORTLAND,OR 97223 2S 101 AA-07700 2S 101 AD-00800 CHORUBY PAUL N .` ITY GRO " FUND 1 LLC 12520 SW 68TH AVE#A BY .'T P• BEY TIGARD,OR 97223 712 :11 .AMPTON •RTLAND, c R 97223 2S 101 AA-07100 2S 101 AD-01700 CORLISS JAMES L&CORA E o. TY GRO ' FUND 1 LLC 9750 SW INEZ BY K 'T !•LBEY TIGARD,OR 97224 712 :n ,AMPTON ••RTLAND, •R 97223 2S 101 AA-07800 2S 101 AC-00100 CORLISS JAMES L&CORA K ETZEL DAVID M&NADINE M PO BOX 23970 13400 SW DOE LN TIGARD, OR 97281 TIGARD,OR 97223 2 101 AA-05700 2S 101 AA-04900 CO' S J: S L&CORA K FAIRMARK INVESTMENTS LLC PO B• 2 ' 0 PO BOX 901 T ARD,OR 9 281 TUALATIN,OR 97062 101 AA-05500 2S 101 AD-02400 COR ES L&CORA K GEORGE FOX UNIVERSITY PO 2 ATTN: FINANCIAL AFFAIRS TIGARD,OR 97281 414 N MERIDIAN NEWBERG,OR 97132 2S101AD-01000 2S101AB-01000 CUTSHALL THELMA HAMPTON PARK LLC 12705 SW 67TH AVE BY WEST COAST MORTGAGE TIGARD,OR 97223 5837 JEAN RD LAKE OSWEGO,OR 97035 2S101AB-00800 2S101AA-09600 H• • 'TON P• 'K LLC PEIRCE STEPHEN W& BY W OAST MORTGAGE PEIRCE LYNN L 583 A 12560 SW 70TH L E OSWEGO, OR 97035 TIGARD,OR 97223 2S101AA-06700 2S101AA-09108 LANDMARK FORD INC R&D PROPERTY DEVELOPMENT LLC PO BOX 23970 12559 SW 69TH AVE TIGARD,OR 97281 TIGARD,OR 97223 2S101AA-04300 2S101AA-08500 L' ‘• A' ORD INC ROTH J T JR&THERESA PO :G' 0 12600 SW 72ND AVE STE 200 GARD,OR 97281 TIGARD,OR 97223 2S101AA-05200 2S101AA-08300 LA A: FORD INC RO T Jr • THERESA PO :!' ' 970 1260: :I' D AVE STE 200 ARD,OR '7281 T ARD,OR 9 '3 2S101AB-02400 2S101AA-08700 LANFARM LLC RO T J THERESA 16869 SW 65TH AVE STE 166 12600 AVE STE 200 LAKE OSWEGO,OR 97035 T ARD,OR 97223 2S101AA-04500 2S101AA-09800 LOUIE PROPERTY MANAGEMENT LLC R J T THERESA ATTN: RICHARD C LOUIE 1260 2ND AVE STE 200 12381 SW WALNUT ST ARD,OR 223 TIGARD,OR 97223 2S 101 AD-02700 2S 101 AB-02500 MCCROSKEY JOHN B SHIM STEVE S&JANET H 1380 MORNING SKY CT 14347 SW KOVEN CT LAKE OSWEGO,OR 97034 TIGARD,OR 97224 2S101AD-02800 2S101AA-07900 MORTON DON R AND CYNTHIA SUE SPRINGER JERRY&C DIANNE TRS BY MAIL MEMONDAY-N JOHANNE 7400 SW FAIRWAY DR 3109 NE BROADWAY WILSONVILLE,OR 97070 PORTLAND,OR 97232 2S101AD-01400 2S101AA-08302 OREGON KI SOCIETY SZAMBELAN PETER J&ELOISE M 12700 SW 68TH AVE 3258 LAKEVIEW BLVD TIGARD,OR 97223 LAKE OSWEGO,OR 97035 2S101AD-00100 01AA-08600 PARROTT VIAL LLC TIG D C OF 12725 SW 66TH AVE#202 1312 HALL PORTLAND,OR 97223 T, ARD,0 97223 2 1 O1 AA-0880 TIG D OF 131 HALL ARD,O 97223 2S101AA-09100 TIGARD CORPORATE CENTER LTD PARTNERSHIP ATTN:GREG SPECHT 15400 MILLIKAN WAY BEAVERTON,OR 97006 2S101AA-03800 T GARD CORPO• • ' CENTER LTD ••RTNE:: IP ATTN: c: G SPECHT 15400 ILL •N WAY AVERTON, ►- 97006 2S 101 AA-06400 TING ELON&SYLVIA BY WILLIAM R SOUTHARD 603 SE VICTORY AVE STE 100 VANCOUVER,WA 98661 2S101AD-02900 TRIANGLE TERRACE LLC 12600 SW 72ND AVE#200 TIGARD,OR 97223 2S 101 AC-00300 WEAVER MICHAEL D&GAIL B 7075 SW GONZAGA ST TIGARD,OR 97223 2S 101 AA-07600 WILHELM MICHAEL W TR 13085 SW 124TH AVE TIGARD,OR 97223 2S 101 AB-02800 ZEEK VELMA EDWARDS 7060 SW BEVELAND TIGARD,OR 97223 Jack Biethan 11023 SW Summerfield Drive, #4 Tigard, OR 97224 Sue Rorman 11250 SW 82nd Avenue Tigard, OR 97223 Naomi Gallucci 11285 SW 78th Avenue Tigard, OR 97223 Michael Trigoboff 7072 SW Barbara Lane Tigard, OR 97223 Dieter Jacobs 7775 SW Spruce Street Tigard, OR 97223 Alexander Craghead 12205 SW Hall Boulevard Tigard, OR 97223-6210 David Chapman 9840 SW Landau Place Tigard, OR 97223 Nathan and Ann Murdock PO Box 231265 Tigard, OR 97281 Brad Spring 7555 SW Spruce Street Tigard, OR 97223 CITY OF TIGARD - EAST CIT SUBCOMMITTEE (i:\curpin\setup\labels\CIT East.doc) UPDATED: April 18, 2002 AFFIDAVIT OF MAILING CITY OF TIOARD Community'Development Shaping Better Community I, Patricia L. Lunsford, being first duly sworn/affirm, on oath depose and say that I am a Senior Administrative Specialist for the City ofTigar , Wasfiington County, Oregon and that I served the following: (Check Appropnate Box(s)Below) © NOTICE OF DECISION FOR: SDR2002-00006/JT ROTH OFFICE BUILDING ❑ AMENDED NOTICE (File No./Name Reference) ® City of Tigard Planning Director A copy of the said notice being hereto attached, marked Exhihil"A", and by reference made a part hereof, was mailed to each named person(s) at the address(s) shown on the attached list(s), marked Exhihit'B", and by reference made a part hereof, on July 22,2002, and deposited in the United States Mail on July 22,2002, postage prepaid. (Person that P pared Notice) AAA orF oGoIsi ) County of Washington )ss. City of Tigard ) Subscribed and sworn/affirmed before me on the /3 day of , 2002. OFFICIAL SEAL `rr DIANE M JELDERKS G- NOTARY PUBLIC-OREGON ' COMMISSION >578 / MY COMMISSION EXPIRES RES S SEPT.07,2003 .. ,. / /L My Commission Expi .. ' 7 EXHY NOTICE OF TYPE II DECISION SITE DEVELOPMENT REVIEW (SDR) 2002-00006 w .1J1. CITY OF TIGARD JT ROTH OFFICE BUILDING Community<Development Shaping,A Better Community 120 DAYS = 9/28/2002 SECTION I. APPLICATION SUMMARY FILE NAME: JT ROTH OFFICE BUILDING CASE NO.: Site Development Review (SDR) SDR2002-00006 PROPOSAL: The applicant is requesting Site Development Review for construction of a two-story, 7,634 square foot office building in the Tigard Triangle. The property is 17,866 square feet in size, and currently vacant. A portion of the property is surplus right-of-way that is being sold to the applicant. APPLICANT\ JT Roth Construction, Inc. OWNER: City of Tigard OWNER: 12600 SW 72nd, Suite 200 13125 SW Hall Blvd. Portland, OR 97223 Tigard, OR 97223 LOCATION: The property is located on the corner of 68th and Beveland and is described as, WCTM 2S101AA, Tax Lots 8300, 8500, 8600 and 8700. ZONE: MUE. Mixed Use Employment. The MUE zoning district is designed to apply to a majority of the land within the Tigard Triangle, a regional mixed-use employment district bounded by Pacific Highway (Hwy. 99), Highway 217 and 1-5. This zoning district permits a wide range of uses including major retail goods and services, business/professional offices, civic uses and housing; the latter includes multi-family housing at a maximum density of 25 units/acre, equivalent to the R-25 zoning district. A wide range of uses, including but not limited to community recreation facilities, religious institutions, medical centers, schools, utilities and transit-related park-and-ride lots, are permitted conditionally. APPLICABLE REVIEW CRITERIA: Community Development Code Chapters 18.360, 18.390, 18.520, 18.620, 18.705, 18.725, 18.745, 18.755, 18.765, 18.780, 18.790, 18.795 and 18.810. SECTION II. DECISION Notice is hereby given that the City of Tigard Community Development Director's designee has APPROVED the above request subject to certain conditions of approval. The findings and conclusions on which the decision is based are noted in Section VII. NOTICE OF TYPE II DECISION SDR2002-00006/JT ROTH OFFICE BUILDING PAGE 1 OF 25 CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL THE FOLLOWING CONDITIONS SHALL BE SATISFIED PRIOR TO THE ISSUANCE OF SITE/BUILDING PERMITS: Submit to the Engineering Department (Brian Rager, 639-4171, ext. 2471) for review and approval: 1. Prior to issuance of the site permit, the applicant shall submit a suite layout map to Shirley Treat, Engineering Department. If the applicant is not sure how many suites will be used, they must estimate a number. The City will then assign suite numbers and the address fee will then be calculated. The applicant prior to issuance of the site permit must pay the fee. (STAFF CONTACT: Shirley Treat, Engineering). 2. The applicant shall provide an on-site water quality facility as required by Clean Water Services Design and Construction Standards (adopted by Resolution and Order No. 00-7). Final plans and calculations shall be submitted to the Engineering Department (Brian Rager) for review and approval prior to issuance of the site permit. In addition, a proposed maintenance plan shall be submitted along with the plans and calculations for review and approval. 3. Prior to issuance of a building permit, the applicant shall obtain approval from the Tualatin Valley Water District for the proposed water connection. Submit to the Planning Division (Brad Kilby, 503-639-4171, ext. 2434) for review and approval: 4. Prior to any site work, the applicant shall submit a revised site plan that shows a walkway, a minimum of six feet in width from the buildings' entrance to SW 68th Avenue. 5. Prior to any site work, the applicant shall provide staff with a shared access agreement or crossover easement. Said document shall be recorded once reviewed by staff. 6. Prior to the issuance of building permits, the applicant shall submit revised building elevation and floor plan drawings that illustrates compliance with the weather protection standards for all building entrances, and the ground floor window standards. The applicant shall also demonstrate the type and size of the mechanical rooftop equipment. For equipment taller than 36 inches, it shall be setback from the roof edge 3 feet for each foot over 36 inches in height. 7. Prior to the issuance of building permits, the applicant shall submit a revised site plan that identifies the material and height of the trash enclosure. 8. Prior to the issuance of building permits, the applicant shall submit verification from the franchise waste hauler indicating that the location of the proposed trash enclosure meets their requirements. 9. Prior to the issuance of building permits, the applicant shall submit details addressing the design standards of the Mixed Solid Waste and Recyclable Storage in order for Staff to determine that this standard has been met. 10. Prior to the issuance of building permits, the applicant shall submit a revised parking plan that demonstrates compliance with TDC Chapter 18.765. The plan shall not permit more than 50% of the spaces to be compact. 11. The project shall reserve 5 percent of the proposed parking for carpool/vanpool parking as close to the buildings as practicable, with the exception of disabled parking. The spaces shall be clearly labeled. 12. The compact parking spaces shall be marked as "compact" or with a large "C". The access drive shall be marked with directional arrows. NOTICE OF TYPE II DECISION SDR2002-00006/JT ROTH OFFICE BUILDING PAGE 2 OF 25 13. Prior to the issuance of building permits, the applicant shall revise the parking plan to remove the parking space that is located within the vision clearance triangle. 14. Prior to constructing any signs, the applicant shall attain a sign permit from the City of Tigard. 15. Submit a detailed lighting plan for the exterior of the building. THE FOLLOWING CONDITIONS SHALL BE SATISFIED PRIOR TO A FINAL BUILDING INSPECTION: Submit to the Engineering Department (Brian Rager, 639-4171, ext. 2471) for review and approval: 16. Prior to final building inspection, the applicant,shall pay $512.00 to the City for the striping of the bike lane along the frontage of 68 Parkway. 17. To ensure compliance with Clean Water Services design and construction standards, the applicant shall employ the design engineer responsible for the design and specifications of the private water quality facility to perform construction and visual observation of the water quality facility for compliance with the design and specifications. These inspections shall be made at significant stages, and at completion of the construction. Prior to final building inspection, the design engineer shall provide the City of Tigard (Inspection Supervisor) with written confirmation that the water quality facility is in compliance with the design and specifications. Staff Contact: Hap Watkins, Building Division. 18. Prior to a final building inspection, the applicant shall demonstrate that they have entered into a maintenance agreement with Stormwater Management, or another company that demonstrates they can meet the maintenance requirements of the manufacturer, for the proposed onsite storm water treatment facility. THIS APPROVAL SHALL BE VALID FOR EIGHTEEN (18) MONTHS FROM THE EFFECTIVE DATE OF THIS DECISION. SECTION III. BACKGROUND INFORMATION Site History: Staff conducted a search of City records for the subject property and found no other land use cases related to the property. Vicinity Information: The subject site is located on the corner of SW 68th Avenue and SW Beveland Street. The site is bordered on all sides by Mixed Use Employment (MUE) zoning. The subject site is surrounded by commercial office developments. Site Information and Proposal Description: The proposed site is composed of four different tax lots. The City of Tigard has ownership in tax lot 8600. The applicant has provided a purchase agreement, and the City Manager, Bill Monahan, has signed the application.pplication. The site is relatively flat and vacant. The surrounding properties are characterized commercial office developments and located within the Mixed Use Employment zoning district. The applicant is proposing to construct a two-story, 7,634 square foot office building. The entire site is 17,866 square feet in size. SECTION IV. NEIGHBORHOOD COMMENTS The Tigard Community Development Code requires that property owners within 500 feet of the subject site be notified of the proposal, and be given an opportunity for written comments and/or oral testimony prior to a decision being made. In addition, the applicant is required to post the site with notice of the proposal. Staff has verified that the site is posted. Staff has not received any written or verbal comments from any neighbors about this application. NOTICE OF TYPE II DECISION SDR2002-00006/JT ROTH OFFICE BUILDING PAGE 3 OF 25 • SECTION V. DECISION MAKING PROCEDURES, PERMITS AND USE USE CLASSIFICATION: SECTION 18.130.020 Lists the Use Categories. The applicant is seeking approval of a 7,634 square foot office building on a 17,866 square foot lot located within the Tigard Triangle. This use is classified in Code Chapter 18.130 (Use Classifications) as Office. The site is located within the MUE, Mixed Use Employment zoning district. Table 18.520.1 lists office uses as a permitted use in the MUE zone. SUMMARY LAND USE PERMITS: CHAPTER 18.310 Defines the decision-making type to which the land-use application is assigned. This is a Site Development Review, which is reviewed as a Type II-staff decision. DECISION MAKING PROCEDURES: CHAPTER 18.390 Describes the decision-making procedures. Type II procedures apply to quasi-judicial permits and actions that contain some discretionary criteria. Type II actions are decided by the Director with public notice and an opportunity for a hearing. If any party with standing appeals a Director's Type II decision, the appeal of such decision will be heard by the Hearings Officer; SECTION VI. SUMMARY OF APPLICABLE REVIEW CRITERIA The proposal's consistency with these Code Chapters is reviewed in the following sections: A. Zoning Districts 18.520 Commercial Zoning Districts B. Applicable Development Code Standards 18.620 Tigard Triangle Design Standards 18.705 Access Egress and Circulation 18.725 Environmental Performance Standards 18.745 Landscaping and Screening 18.755 Mixed Solid Waste and Recyclable Storage 18.765 Off-Street parking and loading requirements 18.780 Signs 18.790 Tree Removal 18.795 Visual Clearance C. Specific SDR Approval Criteria 18.360 D. Street and Utility Improvement Standards 18.810 E. Decision MakinggProcedures 18.390 Impact-Study SECTION VII. APPLICABLE DEVELOPMENT CODE STANDARDS A. ZONIING DISTRICTS Commercial Zoning District: Section 18.520.020 Lists the description of the Commercial Zoning Districts. The site is located in the MUE: Mixed-Use Employment zoning district. The proposed use, general office space, is outright permitted in the zone. Development Standards: Section 18.520.040.B States that Development standards in commercial zoning districts are contained in Table 18.520.2 below: NOTICE OF TYPE II DECISION SDR2002-00006/JT ROTH OFFICE BUILDING PAGE 4 OF 25 TABLE 18.520.2 DEVELOPMENT STANDARDS IN COMMERCIAL ZONES STANDARD MUE PROPOSED Minimum Lot Size None 17,866 S.F. - Detached unit - - Boarding, lodging, rooming house Minimum Lot Width 50 ft 90 ft Minimum Setbacks -Front yard 0'min/10'max 2 ft -Side facing street on corner&through lots - -Side yard 0/20 ft [1] 2 ft/37.6 ft -Side or rear yard abutting more restrictive zoning district - - Rear yard 0/20 ft [1] 119.4 ft -Distance between front of garage& property line - - abutting a public or private street. Maximum Height 45 ft 30.4 ft Maximum Site Coverage [2] 85% 80.9% Maximum Floor Area Ratio 0.4 0.4 Minimum Landscape Requirement _ 15% 19.1% [1]no setback shall be required except 20 feet shall be required where the zone abuts a residential zone. [2]includes all buildings and impervious area As demonstrated in the table above, the applicant's plans comply with the dimensional standards of the MUE zone. FINDING: Based on the analysis above, the underlying zone's development criteria have been satisfied. B. APPLICABLE DEVELOPMENT CODE STANDARDS A. TRIANGLE DESIGN STANDARDS (18.620): Design standards for public street improvements and for new development and renovation projects have been prepared for the Tigard Triangle. These design standards address several important guiding principals adopted for the Tigard Triangle, including creating a high-quality mixed use employment area, providing a convenient pedestrian and bikeway system within the Triangle, and utilizing streetscape to create a high quality image for the area. All new developments are expected to contribute to the character and quality of the area. In addition to meeting the design standards described below and other development standards required by the Development and Building Codes, developments will be required to dedicate and improve public streets, connect to public facilities such as sanitary sewer, water and storm drainage, and participate in funding future transportation and public improvement projects necessary within the Tigard Triangle. The following design standards apply to all development located within the Tigard Triangle. If a standard found in this section conflicts with another standard in the Development Code, standards in this section shall govern. Street Connectivity: All development must demonstrate how one (1) of the following standard options will be met. Variance of these standards may be approved per the requirements of Chapter 18.370 where topography, barriers such as railroads or freeways, or environmental constraints such as major streams and rivers prevent street extensions and connections. NOTICE OF TYPE II DECISION SDR2002-00006/JT ROTH OFFICE BUILDING PAGE 5 OF 25 Design Option: a. Local street spacing shall provide public street connections at intervals of no more than 660 feet; b. Bike and pedestrian connections on public easements or right-of-way shall be provided at intervals of no more than 330 feet. Performance Option: a. Local street spacing shall occur at intervals of no less than eight (8) street intersections per mile; b. The shortest vehicle trip over public streets from a local origin to a collector or greater facility is no more than twice the straight-line distance; c. The shortest pedestrian trip on public right-of-way from a local origin to a collector or greater facility is no more than one and one-half the straight-line distance. The proposal is locate between SW 68th and SW 69th, and has frontage on SW Beveland. Beveland and SW 69t Streets are classified as neighborhood routes in the Transportation System Plan that was recently adopted by the Tigard City Council. SW 68th Avenue is a collector and adjacent to the proposed site. Therefore, the performance option has been met. Site Design Standards: All development must meet the following site design standards. If a parcel is one (1) acre or larger a phased development plan must be approved demonstrating how these standards for the overall parcel can be met. Variance to these standards may be granted if the criteria found in Section 18.370.010C2 (Criteria for Granting a Variance) is satisfied. At .41 acres, the subject site is less than an acre, and the applicant has not indicated that the project will be phased. Therefore, this criterion is inapplicable. Building Placement On Major And Minor Arterials And The Street: Buildings shall occupy a minimum of 50 percent of all street frontages along Major and Minor Arterial Streets. Buildings shall be located at public street intersections on Major and Minor Arterial Streets. SW 68th, SW 69th, and SW Beveland Streets are neither classified as a major nor minor arterial. Therefore, this criterion does not apply. Building Setback: The minimum building setback from public street rights-of-way or dedicated wetlands/buffers and other environmental features, shall be 0 feet; the maximum building setback shall be 10 feet. The proposed building is 2 feet from the current property line fronting SW Beveland Street, and SW 68th Avenue. This criterion is satisfied. Front Yard Setback Design: Landscaping, an arcade, or a hard-surfaced expansion of the pedestrian path must be provided between a structure and a public street or accessway. If a building abuts more than one (1) street, the required improvements shall be provided on all streets. Landscaping shall be developed to an L-1 standard on public streets. Hard-surfaced areas shall be constructed with scored concrete or modular paving materials. Benches and other street furnishings are encouraged. These areas shall contribute to the minimum landscaping requirement per Section 18.620.070. The landscape plan indicates that a combination of landscaping and a concrete walk will be located between the building and the public streets. Landscaping and walkways will be discussed further in this decision under Chapter 18.745 (Landscaping & Screening). NOTICE OF TYPE II DECISION SDR2002-00006/JT ROTH OFFICE BUILDING PAGE 6 OF 25 Walkway Connection To Building Entrances: A walkway connection is required between the building's entrance and the public street or accessway providing access to the property. This walkway must be at least six (6) feet wide and be paved with scored concrete or modular paving materials. Building entrances at a corner near a public street intersection are encouraged. These areas shall contribute to the minimum landscaping requirement per Section 18.620.070. The applicant's plans show an entrance along SW 68th Avenue, the street providing access to the site, and the sidewalk between the building and the street is at least 6 feet wide, but the sidewalk leading to the entrance is only 4 feet wide. This criterion is not fully met. FINDING: The applicant's plans do not provide a sufficient walkway connection. Parking Location And Landscape Design: Parking for buildings or phases adjacent to public street rights-of-way must be located to the side or rear of newly constructed buildings. If located on the side, parking is limited to 50% of the street frontage and must be behind a landscaped area constructed to an L-1 Landscape Standard. The minimum depth of the L-1 landscaped area is five feet or the building setback, whichever is greater. Interior side and rear yards shall be landscaped to an L-2 Landscape Standard, except where a side yard abuts a public street, where it shall be landscaped to an L-1 Landscape Standard. The proposed site has frontage on three streets, and the building has more than 50% of frontage on SW 68th which as discussed previously is a collector. The proposed parking area is located to the rear of the structure, but on the corner of SW Beveland and SW 69th Avenue. The parking lot is bordered on both frontages by an L-1 type landscape. This criterion is satisfied. Building Design Standards: All non-residential buildings shall comply with the following design standards. Variance to these standards may be granted if the criteria found in Section 18.370.010 (Criteria for Granting a Variance) is satisfied. Ground Floor Windows: All street-facing elevations within the Building Setback (0 to 10 feet) along public streets shall include a minimum of 50 percent of the ground floor wall area with windows, display areas or doorway openings. The ground floor wall area shall be measured from three (3) feet above grade to nine (9) feet above grade the entire width of the street-facing elevation. The ground floor window requirement shall be met within the ground floor wall area and for glass doorway openings to ground level. Up to 50 percent of the ground floor window requirement may be met on an adjoining elevation as long as all of the requirement is located at a building corner. According to the standard above, the building must have at a minimum of 50 percent of the ground floor wall area as windows. The east elevation (facing SW 68`h) of the building is 54 feet long, for a total calculated wall area of 324 square feet. Fifty percent of the wall area is 162 square feet. The elevations show 108 square feet of windows, and 45 square feet of glass doorway for a total of 153 square feet. The south elevation (facing SW Beveland) of the building in is 107 feet long, so, the wall area calculated is 642 square feet, and fifty percent of that wall area would constitute 321 square feet. The elevations show 264.6 square feet of windows, and 60 square feet of glass doorway for a total of 324.6 square feet. The combined ground floor wall area considered in this calculation is 966 square feet. Fifty percent of that area would be 483 square feet. However, the applicant has only included a total of 372.6 square feet of window space, and 105 square feet of glass doorways for a total of 477.6 square feet. This falls short of the minimum required, therefore this standard is not met. FINDING: The proposal fails to provide a minimum of 50 percent of the ground floor wall area with windows, display areas, or doorway openings. NOTICE OF TYPE II DECISION SDR2002-00006/JT ROTH OFFICE BUILDING PAGE 7 OF 25 Building Facades: Facades that face a public street shall extend no more than 50 feet without providing at least one (1) of the following features: (a) a variation in building materials; (b) a building off-set of at least 1-foot; (c) a wall area that is entirely separated from other wall areas by a projection, such as an arcade; or (d) by another design features that reflect the building's structural system. No building facade shall extend for more than 300 feet without a pedestrian connection between or through the building. The building has offsets that are projected a minimum of 1 foot from the roofline. The design also includes a variation of two different styles of brick. This criterion is satisfied. Weather Protection: Weather protection for pedestrians, such as awnings, canopies, and arcades, shall be provided at building entrances. Weather protection is encouraged along building frontages abutting a public sidewalk or a hard-surfaced expansion of a sidewalk, and along building frontages between a building entrance and a public street or accessway. Awnings and canopies shall not be backlit. The plans show 2 entrances into the building. The applicant states in the narrative that the main entrance is protected with a two-foot façade to provide the necessary weather protection. However, the standard requires that all entrances into the building are provided with weather protection, and it does not appear that the entrance on SW 68 is protected. This criterion is not satisfied. FINDING: All of the buildings entrances are not provided with weather protection as required by the Tigard Triangle Design Standards. Building Materials: Plain concrete block, plain concrete, corrugated metal, plywood, sheet pressboard or vinyl siding may not be used as exterior finish materials. Foundation material may be plain concrete or plain concrete block where the foundation material is not revealed for more than 2 feet. The building will be constructed of brick. The proposed building materials meet this standard. Roofs And Roof Lines: Except in the case of a building entrance feature, roofs shall be designed as an extension of the primary materials used for the building and should respect the building's structural system and architectural style. False fronts and false roofs are not permitted. The proposed building does not have a false front or false roof. The applicant is proposing a flat roof system with a parapet to conceal mechanical equipment. The parapets are a continuation of the front façade. This criterion is satisfied. Roof-Mounted Equipment: All roof-mounted equipment must be screened from view from adjacent public streets. Satellite dishes and other communication equipment must be set back or positioned on a roof so that exposure from adjacent public streets is minimized. Solar heating panels are exempt from this standard. The applicant has indicated that roof-mounted equipment will be screened according to City standards. The applicant states that mechanical equipment will be screened behind a parapet wall. However, since it is not specified what type and how tall the equipment is to be located on the roof, it is impossible to determine whether the applicant's proposal will adequately screen the equipment. To ensure that mechanical equipment is screened, it shall be setback from the roof edge three feet for each foot over 36 inches in height. Signs: In addition to the requirements of Chapter 18.780 of the Development Code, the following standards shall be met: NOTICE OF TYPE II DECISION SDR2002-00006/JT ROTH OFFICE BUILDING PAGE 8 OF 25 Zoning District Regulations: Non-residential development within the MUE zone shall meet the sign requirements of the C-P zone (18.780.130.D). Sign Area Limits: The maximum sign area limits found in Section 18.780.130 shall not be exceeded. No area limit increases will be permitted within the Tigard Triangle. Height Limits: The maximum height limit for all signs except wall signs shall be 10 feet. Wall signs shall not extend above the roofline of the wall on which the sign is located. No height increases will be permitted within the Tigard Triangle. Sign Location: Freestanding signs within the Tigard Triangle shall not be permitted within required L-1 landscape areas. The applicant has provided details for a sign and identified a location for the sign, however, the sign was not included as part of this application, and the proposed location is within a clear vision triangle. This standard is not applicable at this time. Landscaping and Screening: Two (2) levels of landscaping and screening standards are applicable to the Tigard Triangle. The locations where the landscaping or screening is required and the depth of the landscaping or screening are defined in other sub-sections of this section. These standards are minimum requirements. Higher standards may be substituted as long as all height limitations are met. L-1 (Low Screen): For general landscaping of landscaped and screened areas within parking lots, local collectors and local streets, planting standards of Chapter 18.745 Landscaping and Screening, shall apply. The L-1 standard applies to setbacks on major and minor arterials. Where the setback is a minimum of 5 feet between the parking lot and a major or minor arterial, trees shall be planted at 31/2-inch caliper, at a maximum of 28 feet on center. Shrubs shall be of a variety that will provide a 3-foot high screen and a 90 percent opacity within one (1) year. Groundcover plants must fully cover the remainder of landscape area within two (2) years. Any tree planted in excess of a 2-inch caliper shall be eligible for full mitigation credit. The proposal does not abut a major or minor arterial, therefore, the L-1 standards do not apply. L-2 (General Landscaping): For general landscaping of landscaped and screened areas within parking lots, local collectors and local streets, planting standards of Chapter 18.745 Landscaping and Screening, shall apply. Trees shall be provided at a minimum 21/2-inch caliper, at a maximum spacing of 28 feet. Shrubs shall be of a size and quality to achieve the required landscaping or screening effect within two (2) years. Any tree planted in excess of a 2-inch caliper shall be eligible for full mitigation credit. Because the site is on a neighborhood route, a local street, and a collector, the L-2 landscape standards defer to Chapter 18.745. Compliance with Landscaping and Screening standards are discussed further in this decision under Chapter 18.745 (Landscaping & Screening). FINDING: Based on the analysis above, the Tigard Triangle Design standards have not been fully met. If the applicant complies with the conditions listed below, the standards will be met. CONDITIONS: Prior to any site work, the applicant shall submit a revised site plan that shows a walkway, a minimum of six feet in width from the buildings' entrance to SW 68th Avenue. NOTICE OF TYPE II DECISION SDR2002-00006/JT ROTH OFFICE BUILDING PAGE 9 OF 25 Prior to the issuance of building permits, the applicant shall submit revised building elevation and floor plan drawings that illustrate compliance with the weather protection standards for all building entrances, and the ground floor window standards. The applicant shall also demonstrate the type and size of the mechanical rooftop equipment. For equipment taller than 36 inches, it shall be setback from the roof edge 3 feet for each foot over 36 inches in height. Prior to constructing any signs, the applicant shall attain a sign permit from the City of Tigard. B. ADDITIONAL APPLICABLE DEVELOPMENT CODE STANDARDS The Site development Review approval standards require that a development proposal be found to be consistent with the various standards of the Community Development Code. The applicable criteria in this case are Chapters 18.360 18.390, 18.520, ¶8.705, 18.745, 18.755, 18.765, 18.775, 18.780, 18.790, 18.795, and 18.810. The proposal's consistency with these Code Chapters is reviewed in the following sections. Access, Egress and Circulation (18.705): Walkways: On-site pedestrian walkways shall comply with the following standards: Walkways shall extend from the ground floor entrances or from the ground floor landing of stairs, ramps, or elevators of all commercial, institutional, and industrial uses to the streets which provide the required access and egress. Walkways shall provide convenient connections between buildings in multi-building commercial, institutional, and industrial complexes. Unless impractical walkways shall be constructed between new and existing developments and neighboring developments; On site pedestrian walkways are present between the building entrances and the street that provides access and egress. A connection to the adjoining development to the north is impractical as that development has placed a row of parking spaces along the common property line, however, walkways are connecting the developments within the right-of-way. This standard is satisfied. Wherever required walkways cross vehicle access driveways or parking lots, such crossings shall be designed and located for pedestrian safety . Required walkways shall be physically separated from motor vehicle traffic and parking by either a minimum 6-inch vertical separation (curbed) or a minimum 3-foot horizontal separation, except that pedestrian crossings of traffic aisles are permitted for distances no greater than 36 feet if appropriate landscaping, pavement markings, or contrasting pavement materials are used. Walkways shall be a minimum of four feet in width, exclusive of vehicle overhangs and obstructions such as mailboxes, benches, bicycle racks, and sign posts, and shall be in compliance with ADA standards; No walkways have been proposed to cross the access drive or parking lot. This standard is inapplicable. Required walkways shall be paved with hard surfaced materials such as concrete, asphalt, stone, brick, etc. Walkways may be required to be lighted and/or signed as needed for safety purposes. Soft-surfaced public use pathways may be provided only if such pathways are provided in addition to required pathways. The plan depicts concrete sidewalks, which meets the standard. Minimum Access Requirements for Commercial and Industrial Use: Section 18.705.030.1 rovides the minimum access requirements for commercial and industrial uses: Table 18.705.3 indicates that the required access width for developments with 0-99 parking spaces is one 30-foot accesses with 24 feet of pavement. Vehicular access shall be provided to commercial or industrial uses, and shall be located to within 50 feet of the primary ground floor entrances; additional requirements for truck traffic may be placed as conditions of site development review. NOTICE OF TYPE II DECISION SDR2002-00006/JT ROTH OFFICE BUILDING PAGE 10 OF 25 The development is proposing to share access off of SW 68th with the property directly to the north. That access is 30 feet wide with 24 feet of pavement. Therefore, this standard is met. FINDING: The applicant is proposing to share access with the property owner to the north of the site, however, there was no agreement provided. CONDITION: Prior to any site work, the applicant shall provide staff with a shared access agreement or crossover easement. Said document shall be recorded once reviewed by staff. Landscaping and Screening (18.745): Street Trees: Section 18.745.040 states that all development projects fronting on a public street or a private drive more than 100 feet in length shall be required to plant street trees in accordance with Section 18.745.040.0 Section 18.745.040.0 requires that street trees be spaced between 20 and 40 feet apart depending on the size classification of the tree at maturity (small, medium or large). The subject site was provided with street trees along the frontage of SW Beveland, and SW 69th Avenue with previous street construction. The property does not have 100 feet of frontage along SW 68th Avenue therefore, the applicant is not required to plant street trees along this frontage. This criterion is satisfied. Buffering and Screening: Section 18.745.080 states that no buffer is required between abutting uses that are of a different type when the uses are separated by a street. No buffer is required between a proposed office use and existing office use. Buffering and/or screening are required for dissimilar uses. All ro erties surrounding subject property are zoned MUE, and developed as commercial office space. According to Table 18.745.1 of the Tigard Development Code, no bufferinc is required except where the parking lot fronts a public street. This buffering is discussed in r e following section. Screening: Special Provisions: Section 18.745.050.E requires the screening of parking and loading areas. Landscaped parking areas shall include special design features which effectively screen the parking lot areas from view. Planting materials to be installed should achieve a relative balance between low lying and vertical shrubbery and trees. Trees shall be planted in landscaped islands in all parking areas, and shall be equally distributed on the basis of one (1) tree for each seven (7) parking spaces in order to provide a canopy effect. The minimum dimension on the landscape islands shall be three (3) feet wide and the landscaping shall be protected from vehicular damage by some form of wheel guard or curb. The parking that is visible from SW Beveland Street and SW 69th Avenue is proposed to have a buffer equal to the L-1 landscaping standard of the Tigard Triangle Design standards. The applicant is proposing landscaped islands containing one tree for every seven spaces with low- lying ground cover and shrubs. The proposed Chanticleer Pear trees are identified as an appropriate tree for this use. Therefore, this criterion is satisfied. Screening Of Service Facilities. Except for one-family and two-family dwellings, any refuse container or disposal area and service facilities such as gas meters and air conditioners which would otherwise be visible from a public street, customer or resident parking area, any public facility or any residential area shall be screened from view by placement of a solid wood fence or masonry wall between five and eight feet in height. All refuse materials shall be contained within the screened area; NOTICE OF TYPE II DECISION SDR2002-00006/JT ROTH OFFICE BUILDING PAGE 11 OF 25 The site plan submitted shows a trash enclosure but does not clearly indicate what type and how tall the enclosure will be. A solid wood fence or masonry wall between five and eight feet in height is required. The applicant's revised plan will need to identify the material and height of the enclosure(s). Screening Of Refuse Containers. Except for one- and two-family dwellings, any refuse container or refuse collection area which would be visible from a public street, parking lot, residential or commercial area, or any public facility such as a school or park shall be screened or enclosed from view by placement of a solid wood fence, masonry wall or evergreen hedge. All refuse shall be contained within the screened area. The applicant's plans show a trash enclosure in a location within the parking lot that is acceptable. The applicant has also indicated that the perimeter of the enclosure would be landscaped, however, the applicant has failed to address the type of fencing that would be used to enclose the enclosure. This criterion is not satisfied. FINDING: Based on the analysis above, the landscaping and screening standards have not been fully met. If the applicant complies with the condition listed below, the standards will be met. CONDITION: Prior to the issuance of building permits, the applicant shall submit a revised site plan that identifies the material and height of the trash enclosure. Mixed Solid Waste and Recyclables Storage (18.755): Chapter 18.755 requires that new construction incorporates functional and adequate space for on-site storage and efficient collection of mixed solid waste and source separated Recyclables prior to pick-up and removal by haulers. The applicant must choose one (1) of the following four (4) methods to demonstrate compliance: Minimum Standard, Waste Assessment, Comprehensive Recycling Plan, or Franchised Hauler Review and Sign-Off. The applicant will have to submit evidence or a plan which indicates compliance with this section. Regardless of which method chosen, the applicant will have to submit a written sign-off from the franchise hauler regarding the facility location and compatibility. The applicant has not addressed Chapter 18.755. Therefore, Staff cannot determine which of the 4 methods will be used to demonstrate compliance. Location Standards. To encourage its use, the storage area for source-separated recyclable shall be co- located with the storage area for residual mixed solid waste; Indoor and outdoor storage areas shall comply with Uniform Building and Fire Code requirements; Storage area space requirements can be satisfied with a single location or multiple locations, and can combine both interior and exterior locations; Exterior storage areas can be located within interior side yard or rear yard areas. Exterior storage areas shall not be located within a required front yard setback or in a yard adjacent to a public or private street; Exterior storage areas shall be located in central and visible locations on a site to enhance security for users; Exterior storage areas can be located in a parking area, if the proposed use provides at least the minimum number of parking spaces required for the use after deducting the area used for storage. Storage areas shall be appropriately screened according to the provisions in 18.755.050 C, design standards; The storage area shall be accessible for collection vehicles and located so that the storage area will not obstruct pedestrian or vehicle traffic movement on the site or on public streets adjacent to the site. The refuse container is accessed from the parking lot and is visible in order to enhance security for users. The proposed refuse container will not occupy any required parking stalls and screening has been conditioned to conform to Tigard standards previously in this decision. NOTICE OF TYPE II DECISION SDR2002-00006/JT ROTH OFFICE BUILDING PAGE 12 OF 25 Design Standards. The dimensions of the storage area shall accommodate containers consistent with current methods of local collection; Storage containers shall meet Uniform Fire Code standards and be made and covered with waterproof materials or situated in a covered area; Exterior storage areas shall be enclosed by a sight-obscuring fence wall, or hedge at least six feet in height. Gate openings which allow access to users and haulers shall be provided. Gate openings for haulers shall be a minimum of 10 feet wide and shall be capable of being secured in a closed and open position; Storage area(s) and containers shall be clearly labeled to indicate the type of materials accepted. The applicant has not submitted a detail of the trash enclosure or refuse container. FINDING: Because the applicant has not provided evidence of compliance with the Mixed Solid Waste and Recyclables Storage design standards, this standard has not been met. If the applicant complies with the conditions listed below, the standards will be met. CONDITIONS: Prior to the issuance of building permits, the applicant shall submit verification from the franchise waste hauler indicating that the location of the proposed trash enclosure meets their requirements. • Prior to the issuance of building permits, the applicant shall submit details addressing the design standards of the Mixed Solid Waste and Recyclable Storage in order for Staff to determine that this standard has been met. Off-Street Parking and Loading (18.765): Location of vehicle parking: Off-street arking spaces for single-family and duplex dwellings and single-family attached dwellings shall be located on the same lot with the dwellings. Off-street parking lots for uses not listed above shall be located not further than 200 feet from the building or use that they are required to serve, measured in a straight line from the building with the following exceptions: a) commercial and industrial uses which require more than 40 parking spaces may provide for the spaces in excess of the required first 40 spaces up.to a distance of 300 feet from the primary site; The 40 parking spaces which remain on the primary site must be available for users in the following order of priority: 1) Disabled-accessible spaces; 2) Short-term spaces; 3) Long-term preferential carpool and vanpool spaces; 4) Long-term spaces. The parking lot associated with this project at the furthest point away from any proposed building entrance is 106 feet. This criterion is satisfied. Joint Parking_ Owners of two or more uses, structures or parcels of land may agree to utilize jointly the same parking and loading spaces when the peak hours of operation do not overlay, subject to the following: 1) The size of the joint parking facility shall be at least as large as the number of vehicle parking spaces required by the larger(est) use per Section 18.765.070; 2) Satisfactory legal evidence shall be presented to the Director in the form of deeds, leases or contracts to establish the joint use; 3) If a joint use arrangement is subsequently terminated, or if the uses change, the requirements of this title thereafter apply to each separately. Joint parking is not proposed with this application. This criterion is in applicable. Parking in Mixed-Use Projects: In mixed-use projects, the required minimum vehicle parking shall be determined using the following formula. 1) Primary use, i.e. that with the largest proportion of total floor area within the development at 100d10 of the minimum vehicle parking required for that use in Section 18.765.060; 2) Secondary use, i.e., that with the second largest percentage of total floor area within the development, at 90% of the vehicle parking required-for that use in Section 18.765.060. 3) Subsequent use or uses, at 80% of the vehicle parking required for that use(s) in Section 18.765.060; 4) The maximum parking allowance shall be 150% of the total minimum parking as calculated in D.1.-3. above. NOTICE OF TYPE II DECISION SDR2002-00006/JT ROTH OFFICE BUILDING PAGE 13 OF 25 This proposal is not considered a mixed-use project as it will contain solely office space. This criterion is inapplicable. Visitor Parking in Multi-Family Residential Developments: Multi-dwelling units with more than 10 required parking spaces shall provide an additional 15% of vehicle parking spaces above the minimum required for the use of guests of residents of the complex. These spaces shall be centrally located or distributed throughout the development. Required bicycle parking facilities shall also be centrally located within or evenly distributed throughout the development. This project does not involve a residential use. Therefore, this standard does not apply. Preferential Long-Term CarpoolNanpool Parking: Parking lots providing in excess of 20 long-term parking spaces shall provide preferential long-term carpool and vanpool parking for employees, students and other regular visitors to the site. At least 5% of total long-term parking spaces shall be reserved for carpool/vanpool use. Preferential parking for carpools/vanpools shall be closer to the main entrances of the building than any other employee or student parking except parking spaces designated for use by the disabled. Preferential carpool/vanpool spaces shall be full-sized per requirements in Section 18.765.040N and shall be clearly designated for use only by carpools and vanpools between 7:00 AM and 5:30 PM Monday through Friday. The proposed parking lot contains a total of 24 parking spaces. Therefore, the applicant will be required to reserve 5 percent (1 space) of the proposed parking for carpool/vanpool parking. Disabled-Accessible Parking: All parking areas shall be provided with the required number of parking spaces for disabled persons as specified by the State of Oregon Uniform Building Code and federal standards. Such parking spaces shall be sized, signed and marked as required by these regulations. The applicant is providing 24 parking spaces, therefore, one (1) van accessible (9 feet wide with an 8-foot aisle) ADA handicap space is required. The applicant's plans show an ADA space that will be 10 feet wide with an 10-foot aisle. Therefore, this standard has been met. Access Drives: With regard to access to public streets from off-street parking: access drives from the street to off-street parking or loading areas shall be designed and constructed to facilitate the flow of traffic and provide maximum safety for pedestrian and vehicular traffic on the site; the number and size of access drives shall be in accordance with the requirements of Chapter, 18.705, Access, Egress and Circulation; access drives shall be clearly and permanently marked and defined through use of rails, fences, walls or other barriers or markers on frontage not occupied by service drives; access drives shall have a minimum vision clearance in accordance with Chapter 18.795, Visual Clearance; access drives shall be improved with an asphalt or concrete surface; and excluding single-family and duplex residences, except as provided by Subsection 18.810.030.P, groups of two or more parking spaces shall be served by a service drive so that no backing movements or other maneuvering within a street or other public right-of-way will be required. The access drive has been addressed previously in this decision. Pedestrian Access: Pedestrian access through parking lots shall be provided in accordance with Section 18.705.030.F. Where a parking area or other vehicle area has a drop-off grade separation, the property owner shall install a wall, railing, or other barrier which will prevent a slow-moving vehicle or driverless vehicle from escaping such area and which will prevent pedestrians from walking over drop-off edges. Pedestrian access has been discussed previously in this decision and there are no drop off edges that require barriers. NOTICE OF TYPE II DECISION SDR2002-00006/JT ROTH OFFICE BUILDING PAGE 14 OF 25 Parking Lot Striping: Except for single-family and duplex residences, any area intended to be used to meet the off-street parking requirements as contained in this Chapter shall have all parking spaces clearly marked; and all interior drives and access aisles shall be clearly marked and signed to show direction of flow and maintain vehicular and pedestrian safety. The plans submitted show the parking spaces will be clearly marked with striping. The compact spaces will need to be marked as will the interior drive. The interior drive needs arrows showing direction of vehicular traffic. Wheel Stops: Parking spaces along the boundaries of a parking lot or adjacent to interior landscaped areas or sidewalks shall be provided with a wheel stop at least four inches high located three feet back from the front of the parking stall. The front three feet of the parking stall may be concrete, asphalt or low lying landscape material that does not exceed the height of the wheel stop. This area cannot be calculated to meet landscaping or sidewalk requirements. The applicant is providing wheel stops and curbs on all of the parking stalls, however, the location of the wheel stops is not three feet back from the front of the stalls as required. This criterion is not satisfied. Space and Aisle Dimensions: Section 18.765.040.N states that: "except as modified for angled parking in Figures 18.765.1 and 18.765.2 the minimum dimensions for parking spaces are: 8.5 feet x 18.5 feet for a standard space and 7.5 feet x 16.5 feet for a compact space"; aisles accommodating two direction traffic, or allowing access from both ends, shall be 24 feet in width. No more than 50% of the required spaces may be compact spaces. The applicant's plans indicate that the standard parking spaces will be 10-12 feet wide, 18.6 feet deep, and 9.1-10.4 feet wide feet by 16.6 feet for compact spaces. The access aisle will be 24 feet wide. The applicants proposal requires a minimum of 20 spaces and a maximum of 25 spaces. The applicant indicates that there will be 14 standard spaces, 1 van accessible space, and 10 compact spaces, however, the site plan indicates 15 compact spaces, 9 standard spaces, and 1 van accessible space. Two of the standard spaces fail to meet the depth requirement for a standard space, and the applicant is illustrating that more than 50% of the spaces are compact. This standard is not satisfied. Bicycle Parking Location and Access: Section 18.765.050 states bicycle parking areas shall be provided at locations within 50 feet of primary entrances to structures; bicycle parking areas shall not be located within parking aisles, landscape areas or pedestrian ways; outdoor bicycle parking shall be visible from on-site buildings and/or the street. When the bicycle parking area is not visible from the street, directional signs shall be used to located the parking area; and bicycle parking may be located inside a building on a floor which has an outdoor entrance open for use and floor location which does not require the bicyclist to use stairs to gain access to the space. Exceptions may be made to the latter requirement for parking on upper stories within a multi-story residential building. The site plan indicates 3-bicycle parking spaces. According to Table 18.765.2 of the Tigard Development Code, the minimum bicycle-parking requirement for an office use is 0.5 spaces per 1,000 square feet. Therefore, the proposed building will be required to provide 3 bicycle rack spaces. This standard is satisfied. Bicycle Parking Design Requirements: Section 18.765.050.C. The following design requirements apply to the installation of bicycle racks: The racks required for required bicycle parking spaces shall ensure that bicycles may be securely locked to them without undue inconvenience. Provision of bicycle lockers for long-term (employee) parking is encouraged but not required; bicycle racks must be securely anchored to the ground, wall or other structure; bicycle parking spaces shall be at least 21/2 feet by six feet long, and, when covered, with a vertical clearance of seven feet. An access aisle of at least five feet wide shall NOTICE OF TYPE II DECISION SDR2002-00006/JT ROTH OFFICE BUILDING PAGE 15 OF 25 • be provided and maintained beside or between each row of bicycle parking; each required bicycle parking space must be accessible without moving another bicycle; required bicycle parking spaces may not be rented or leased except where required motor vehicle parking is rented or leased. At-cost or deposit fees for bicycle parking are exempt from this requirement; and areas set aside for required bicycle parking must be clearly reserved for bicycle parking only. Outdoor bicycle parking facilities shall be surfaced with a hard surfaced material, i.e., pavers, asphalt, concrete or similar material. This surface must be designed to remain well drained. The applicant has not provided a detail of the bike rack to be used, therefore, Staff is unable to confirm that this standard is met. Minimum Bicycle Parking Requirements: The total number of required bicycle parking spaces for each use is specified in Table 18.765.2 in Section 18.765.070.H. In no case shall there be less than two bicycle parking spaces. As discussed above, according to Table 18.765.2 of the Tigard Development Code, the minimum bicycle-parking requirement for an office use is 0.5 spaces per 1,000 square feet. Therefore, the proposal will be required to provide a 3-stall bicycle rack. This standard is satisfied. Minimum Off-Street Parking: Section 18.765.070.H states that the minimum and maximum parking shall be as required in Table 18.765.2. Table 18.765.2 states that the minimum parking for General Office Uses is 2.7 spaces per 1,000 square feet. The proposal is for a 7,634 square foot office building. The applicants proposal requires a minimum of 20 spaces and a maximum of 25 spaces. The applicant indicates that there will be 14 standard spaces, 1 van accessible space, and 10 compact spaces, however, the site plan indicates 15 compact spaces, 9 standard spaces, and 1 van accessible space. Nevertheless, the proposed 25 spaces do not exceed the maximum. This criterion is satisfied. Off-Street Loading Spaces: Commercial, industrial and institutional buildings or structures to be built or altered which receive and distribute material or merchandise by truck shall provide and maintain off-street loading and maneuvering space as follows: A minimum of one loading space is required for buildings with 10,000 gross square feet or more; A minimum of two loading spaces for buildings with 40,000 gross square feet or more. The building is not greater than 10,000 square feet, therefore, the applicant is not required to provide a loading space. FINDING: Based on the analysis above, the off-street parking and loading standards have not been fully satisfied, however, if the applicant complies with the conditions listed below, the standards will be met. CONDITIONS: • Prior to the issuance of building permits, the applicant shall submit a revised parking plan that demonstrates compliance with TDC Chapter 18.765. The plan shall not permit more than 50% of the spaces to be compact. • The project shall reserve 5 percent of the proposed parking for carpool/vanpool parking as close to the buildings as practicable, with the exception of disabled parking. The spaces shall be clearly labeled. • The compact parking spaces shall be marked as "compact" or with a large "C". The access drive shall be marked with directional arrows. NOTICE OF TYPE II DECISION SDR2002-00006/JT ROTH OFFICE BUILDING PAGE 16 OF 25 Signs (18.780): Chapter 18.780.130.D lists the type of allowable signs and sign area permitted in the MUE Zoning District. The proposed sign has been discussed previously in this report. As indicated, the proposed sign is over three feet in height and located within a vision clearance triangle. Signs are not permitted within vision clearance triangles unless they meet all of the criteria. Signs are reviewed through a separate permit process administered by the Development Services Technicians, and the application has been conditioned earlier in this report to attain a sign permit prior to erecting any signs on site. FINDING: Because signs will be reviewed and approved as part of a separate permit process, this standard has been satisfied. Tree Removal (18.790): Section 18.790.030 requires that a tree plan for the planting, removal and protection of trees prepared by a certified arborist shall be provided with a site development review application. The tree plan shall include identification of all existing trees, identification of a program to save existing trees or mitigate tree removal over 12 inches in caliper, which trees are to be removed, protection program defining standards and methods that will be used by the applicant to protect trees during and after construction. There are no trees over six inches in diameter on this lot. There are no trees being removed to accommodate this development. Therefore, this chapter is inapplicable. Visual Clearance Areas (18.795): Chapter 18.795 requires that a clear vision area shall be maintained on the corners of all property adjacent to intersecting right-of-ways or the intersection of a public street and a private driveway. A clear vision area shall contain no vehicle, hedge, planting, fence, wall structure, or temporary or permanent obstruction exceeding three (3) feet in height. The code provides that obstructions that may be located in this area shall be visually clear between three (3) and eight (8) feet in height (8) (trees may be placed within this area provided that all branches below eight (8) feet are removed). A visual clearance area is the triangular area formed by measuring a 30-foot distance along the street right- of-way and the driveway, and then connecting these two (2), 30-foot distance points with a straight line. The applicant has indicated in the narrative and the site plan that a clear vision area will be maintained. However, the vision clearance triangle on the site plan indicates that one of the parking spaces is located within the vision clearance triangle. This criterion is not satisfied. FINDING: Based on the analysis above, the vision clearance standards have not been met. However, if the applicant complies with the following condition, the standard will be met. CONDITION: Prior to the issuance of building permits, the applicant shall revise the parking plan to remove the parking space that is located within the vision clearance triangle. C. SPECIFIC SITE DEVELOPMENT REVIEW APPROVAL STANDARDS Section 18.360.090(A)(2) through 18.360.090(A)(15) provides additional Site Development Review approval standards not necessarily covered by the provisions of the previously listed sections. These additional standards are addressed immediately below with the following exceptions: The proposal contains no elements related to the provisions of the following and are, therefore, found to be inapplicable as approval standards: NOTICE OF TYPE II DECISION SDR2002-00006/JT ROTH OFFICE BUILDING PAGE 17 OF 25 18.360.090.3 (Exterior Elevations); 18.360.090.5 (Privacy and Noise: Multi-family or Group Living Uses); 18.360.090.6 (Private Outdoor Areas: Multi-family Use); 18.360.090.7 (Shared Outdoor Recreation Areas: Multi-family Use); 18.360.090.8 (100-year floodplain); and 18.360.090.9 (Demarcation of Spaces). The following sections were discussed previously in this decision and, therefore, will not be addressed in this section: 18.360.090.4 (Buffering, Screening and Compatibility Between Adjoining Uses; 18.360.090.13 Parking); 18.360.090.14 (Landscaping); 18.360.090.15 (Drainage); and 18.360.090.14 (Provision for the Disabled). Relationship to the Natural and Physical Environment: Buildings shall be: located to preserve existing trees, topography and natural drainage where possible based upon existing site conditions; located in areas not subject to ground slumping or sliding; located to provide adequate distance between adjoining buildings for adequate light, air circulation, and fire-fighting; and oriented with consideration for sun and wind. Trees shall be preserved to the extent possible. Replacement of trees is subject to the requirements of Chapter 18.790, Tree Removal. The building is located on the site in accordance with the Tigard Triangle Design Standards. The site is not in an area identified as prone to sliding. There are no natural features to speak of on site. The site is relatively flat with no trees or slopes associated with the site. FINDING: Based on the analysis above, this standard has been satisfied. Crime Prevention and Safety: A. Windows shall be located so that areas vulnerable to crime can be surveyed by the occupants; B. Interior laundry and service areas shall be located in a way that they can be observed by others; C. Mail boxes shall be located in lighted areas having vehicular or pedestrian traffic; E. The exterior lighting levels shall be selected and the angles shall be oriented towards areas vulnerable to crime; and E. Light fixtures shall be provided in areas having heavy pedestrian or vehicular traffic and in potentially dangerous areas such as parking lots, stairs, ramps and abrupt grade changes. Fixtures shall be placed at a height so that light patterns overlap at a height of seven feet, which is sufficient to illuminate a person. Windows are oriented towards the parking lot and the street. Light fixtures are not shown or described on the applicant's plans. The applicant will need to submit revised site or elevation plans that show light fixtures for the parking lots and walkway areas. FINDING: If the applicant complies with the condition listed below, the standards will be met. CONDITION: Submit a detailed lighting plan for the exterior of the building. Public Transit: Provisions within the plan shall be included for providing for transit if the development proposal is adjacent to an existing or proposed transit route; the requirements for transit facilities shall be based on: the location of other transit facilities in the area; and the size and type of the proposal. The following facilities may be required after City and Tri-Met review: bus stop shelters; turnouts for buses; and connecting paths to the shelters. The site has frontage on SW Beveland Street, SW 68th and SW 69th. There are no Tri-met transit routes on SW Beveland or SW 69th, however, SW 68 h is an identified route. Tri-met did not respond to a request for comments, and it does not appear that any facilities would be needed for this proposal. NOTICE OF TYPE II DECISION SDR2002-00006/JT ROTH OFFICE BUILDING PAGE 18 OF 25 • FINDING: Based on the analysis above, this standard is satisfied. Street And Utility Improvements Standards (Section 18.810): Chapter 18.810 provides construction standards for the implementation of public and private facilities and utilities such as streets, sewers, and drainage. The applicable standards are addressed below: Streets: Improvements: Section 18.810.030.A.1 states that streets within a development and streets adjacent shall be improved in accordance with the TDC standards. Section 18.810.030.A.2 states that any new street or additional street width planned as a portion of an existing street shall be dedicated and improved in accordance with the TDC. Minimum Rights-of-Way and Street Widths: Section 18.620.080.A, Tigard Triangle Street and Accessway Standards, requires a local street to have a 60-foot right-of-way width and a 36-foot paved section. Other improvements required may include on-street parking, sidewalks and bikeways, underground utilities, street lighting, storm drainage, and street trees. This site lies adjacent to SW 68th Parkway, SW 69th Avenue and SW Beveland Street. 68th Parkway is classified as a minor arterial per the Triangle standards, requiring a 70-foot wide ROW. Both 69t Avenue and Beveland Street are classified as local streets per the Triangle standards. All three streets have been fully improved to meet current City standards. No further ROW dedications or street improvements are necessary. Sidewalks: Section 18.810.070.A requires that sidewalks be constructed to meet City design standards and be located on both sides of arterial, collector and local residential streets. Sidewalks have already been constructed along the frontages surrounding this site. This criterion is satisfied. Sanitary Sewers: Sewers Required: Section 18.810.090.A requires that sanitary sewer be installed to serve each new development and to connect developments to existing mains in accordance with the provisions set forth in Design and Construction Standards for Sanitary and Surface Water Management (as adopted by the Unified Sewerage Agency in 1996 and including any future revisions or amendments) and the adopted policies of the comprehensive plan. Over-sizing: Section 18.810.090.0 states that proposed sewer systems shall include consideration of additional development within the area as projected by the Comprehensive Plan. There is an existing 8-inch public sewer line located in 69th Avenue with ample capacity for this area. The applicant's plans show. they will connect to this main line via an existing service lateral provided as a part of the 69t Avenue LID project. Storm Drainage: General Provisions: Section 18.810.100.A states requires developers to make adequate provisions for storm water and flood water runoff. NOTICE OF TYPE II DECISION SDR2002-00006/JT ROTH OFFICE BUILDING PAGE 19 OF 25 Accommodation of Upstream Drainage: Section 18.810.100.0 states that a culvert or other drainage facility shall be large enough to accommodate potential runoff from its entire upstream drainage area, whether inside or outside the development. The City Engineer shall approve the necessary size of the facility, based on the provisions of Design and Construction Standards for Sanitary and Surface Water Management (as adopted by the Unified Sewerage Agency in 2000 and including any future revisions or amendments). There are no existing upstream public drainage areas that impact this site. Effect on Downstream Drainage: Section 18.810.100.D states that where it is anticipated by the City Engineer that the additional runoff resulting from the development will overload an existing drainage facility, the Director and Engineer shall withhold approval of the development until provisions have been made for improvement of the potential condition or until provisions have been made for storage of additional runoff caused by the development in accordance with the Design and Construction Standards for Sanitary and Surface Water Management (as adopted by the Unified Sewerage agency in 2000 and including any future revisions or amendments). In 1997, Clean Water Services (CWS) completed a basin study of Fanno Creek and adopted the Fanno Creek Watershed Management Plan. Section V of that plan includes a recommendation that local governments institute a stormwater detention/effective impervious area reduction program resulting in no net increase in storm peak flows up to the 25-year event. The City will require that all new developments resulting in an increase of impervious surfaces provide onsite detention facilities, unless the development is located adjacent to Fanno Creek. For those developments adjacent to Fanno Creek, the storm water runoff will be permitted to discharge without detention. The applicant's plans show they will convey their onsite runoff to a detention facility near the southwest corner of the site. From thee, the water will be conveyed via pipe connection to an existing catch basin at the corner of 69t Avenue and Beveland Street. Bikeways and Pedestrian Pathways: Bikeway Extension: Section 18.810.110.A states that developments adjoining proposed bikeways identified on the City's adopted pedestrian/bikeway plan shall include provisions for the future extension of such bikeways through the dedication of easements or right-of-way. SW 68th Parkway is designated as a bicycle facility. Currently, there are no bike lanes striped along this roadway, although the roadway is of ample width to accommodate them. Cost of Construction: Section 18.810.110.B states that development permits issued for planned unit developments, conditional use permits, subdivisions, and other developments which will principally benefit from such bikeways shall be conditioned to include the cost or construction of bikeway improvements. The applicant should contribLte funds toward the future striping of a bike lane adjacent to the frontage of this site on SW 68 h Parkway. The amount of the striping would be as follows: • 90 feet of 8-inch white stripe, at $2.50/If $225.00 • 3 Mono-directional reflective markers © $4.00/ea $ 12.00 • 1 Bike lane legends © $175/ea $175.00 • 1 Directional mini-arrows @ $100/ea $100.00 $512.00 Minimum Width: Section 18.810.110.0 states that the minimum width for bikeways within the roadway is five feet per bicycle travel lane. Minimum width for two-way bikeways separated from the road is eight feet. NOTICE OF TYPE II DECISION SDR2002-00006/JT ROTH OFFICE BUILDING PAGE 20 OF 25 As was stated previously, the existing pavement width on 68th Parkway is sufficient for bike lanes. Utilities: Section 18.810.120 states that all utility lines, but not limited to those required for electric, communication, lighting and cable television services and related facilities shall be placed underground, except for surface mounted transformers, surface mounted connection boxes and meter cabinets which may be placed above ground, temporary utility service facilities during construction, high capacity electric lines operating at 50,000 volts or above, and: • The developer shall make all necessary arrangements with the serving utility to provide the underground services; • The City reserves the right to approve location of all surface mounted facilities; • All underground utilities, including sanitary sewers and storm drains installed in streets by the developer, shall be constructed prior to the surfacing of the streets; and • Stubs for service connections shall be long enough to avoid disturbing the street improvements when service connections are made. Exception to Under-Grounding Requirement: Section 18.810.120.0 states that a developer shall pay a fee in-lieu of under-grounding costs when the development is proposed to take place on a street where existing utilities which are not underground will serve the development and the approval authority determines that the cost and technical difficulty of under-grounding the utilities outweighs the benefit of under-grounding in conjunction with the development. The determination shall be on a case-by-case basis. The most common, but not the only, such situation is a short frontage development for which under-grounding p ing would result in the placement of additional poles, rather than the removal of above-ground utilities facilities. An applicant for a development which is served by utilities which are not underground and which are located across a public right-of-way from the applicant's property shall pay a fee in-lieu of under-grounding. There are no existing overhead utility lines adjacent to this site. D. ADDITIONAL CITY AND/OR AGENCY CONCERNS WITH STREET AND UTILITY IMPROVEMENT STANDARDS: Traffic Study Findings: The applicant's traffic engineer, Lancaster Engineering, submitted a traffic impact report, dated May 21, 2002, to address the project impacts to the following critical intersections: 72n Avenue/Dartmouth Street and 68 Parkway/Dartmouth Street. The two critical intersections have been identified as needing traffic signals. As development has occurred in the Tigard Triangle, and where a development introduces additional trips to these intersections, funds have been collected from the developers that will contribute to the future signal installation. The first project to contribute funds to the intersections was the Babies R Us project. A simple formula was established based upon the impact from that development. That project had an impact of 1.1% at SW 72' Avenue/SW Dartmouth Street during the PM peak hour. For that impact, the City Council required the developer to pay funds in the amount of $20,000.00. At the intersection of SW 68t Avenue/SW Dartmouth Street, the impact from that project was estimated to be 0.75%. For this impact, the developer was required to pay $10,000.00. Using this same rationale, a proportionate share has been calculated for other projects in the Triangle, and can be calculated for this project. Lancaster's report shows that tl is project will generate approximately four PM peak hour trips to the intersection of SW 72n Avenue/SW Dartmouth Street. With a total entering volume (TEV) of 2,555 vehicles, the project impact is approximately 0.16%. Therefore, based on simple proportions, the project contribution to this intersection is $2,909.00. NOTICE OF TYPE II DECISION SDR2002-00006/JT ROTH OFFICE BUILDING PAGE 21 OF 25 • Likewise, the Lancaster report shows that the project will generate approximately three PM peak hour trips at the intersection of SW 68 h Avenue/SW Dartmouth Street. The expected TEV is approximately 2,660 vehicles. The impact from this development is approximately 0.11%. Therefore, based on the same proportion used in the Babies R Us development, the project contribution to this intersection is $1,467.00. Funds for both intersections must be paid to the City prior to a final building inspection. Public Water System: This site lies within the Tualatin Valley Water District (TVWD) service area. Comments were submitted by TVWD indicating that the applicant's plan is not quite accurate. The existing water line size in 68th Parkway is 8-inches, versus the 12-inch size shown on the plan. In addition, TVWD stated that there is an existing 1-inch meter provided to this site along the frontage of 68 Parkway. The applicant's plans show a proposed new water meter to be installed along the frontagt of Beveland Street. TVWD will expect the applicant to use the existing 1-inch meter on 68 Parkway. Storm Water Quality: The City has agreed to enforce Surface Water Management (SWM) regulations established by the Unified Sewerage Agency (USA) Design and Construction Standards (adopted by Resolution and Order No. 00-7) which require the construction of on-site water quality facilities. The facilities shall be designed to remove 65 percent of the phosphorus contained in 100 percent of the storm water runoff generated from newly created impervious surfaces. In addition, a maintenance plan shall be submitted indicating the frequency and method to be used in keeping the facility maintained through the year. Prior to construction, the applicant shall submit plans and calculations for a water quality facility that will meet the intent of the CWS Design Standards. In addition, the applicant shall submit a maintenance plan for the facility that must be reviewed and approved by the City prior to construction. The applicant's preliminary sizing calculations show that they will treat a flow rate of approximately 0.033 CFS. This can be accommodated by the use of two Stormwater Management catch basin units. Staff concurs that this would be an acceptable solution. To ensure compliance with Clean Water Services design and construction standards, the applicant shall employ the design engineer responsible for the design and specifications of the private water quality facility to perform construction and visual observation of the water quality facility for compliance with the design and specifications. These inspections shall be made at significant stages throughout the project and at completion of the construction. Prior to final building inspection, the design engineer shall provide the City of Tigard (Inspection Supervisor) with written confirmation that the water quality facility is in compliance with the design and specifications. The proposed units from Stormwater Management is acceptable, provided the property owner agrees to hire the manufacturer (or approved equal) to provide the required maintenance of the units. Prior to a final building inspection, the applicant shall demonstrate that they have entered into a maintenance agreement with Stormwater Management, or another company that demonstrates they can meet the maintenance requirements of the manufacturer. Grading and Erosion Control: USA Design and Construction Standards also regulate erosion control to reduce the amount of sediment and other pollutants reaching the public storm and surface water system resulting from development, construction, grading, excavating, clearing, and any other activity which accelerates erosion. Per USA regulations, the applicant is required to submit an erosion control plan for City review and approval prior to issuance of City permits. A site grading plan will be reviewed by the Building Division as a part of the site permit review. NOTICE OF TYPE II DECISION SDR2002-00006/JT ROTH OFFICE BUILDING PAGE 22 OF 25 Address Assignments: The City of Tigard is responsible for assigning addresses for parcels within the City of Tigard and within the Urban Service Boundary (USB). An addressing fee in the amount of y$30.00 per address shall be assessed. This fee shall be paid to the City prior to issuance of the site permit. For multi-tenant buildings, one address number is assigned to the building and then all tenant spaces are given suite numbers. The City is responsible for assigning the main address and suite numbers. This information is needed so that building permits for tenant improvements can be adequately tracked in the City's permit tracking system. Based upon the information provided by the applicant, this building will be a multi-tenant building. Prior to issuance of the site permit, the applicant shall provide a suite layout map so suite numbers can be assigned. The addressing fee will then be calculated based upon the number of suites that must be addressed. In multi-level structures, ground level suites shall have numbers preceded by a "1", second level suites shall have numbers preceded by a "2", etc. F. IMPACT STUDY (18.390) Section 18.360.090 states, "The Director shall make a finding with respect to each of the following criteria when approving, approving with conditions or denying an application:" Section 18.390.040 states that the applicant shall provide an impact study to quantify the effect of development on public facilities and services. For each public facility system and type of impact, the study shall propose improvements necessary to meet City standard, and to minimize the impact of the development on the public at large, public facilities systems, and affected private property users. In situations where the Community Development Code requires the dedication of real property interests, the applicant shall either specifically concur with a requirement for public right-of-way dedication, or provide evidence that supports that the real property dedication is not roughly proportional to the projected impacts of the development. Section 18.390.040 states that when a condition of approval requires the transfer to the public of an interest in real property, the approval authority shall adopt findings which support the conclusion that the interest in real property to be transferred is roughly proportional to the impact the proposed development will have on the public. The applicant has provided an impact study addressing the project's impacts on public systems. The Washington County Traffic Impact Fee (TIF) is a mitigation measure that is required at the time of development. Based on a transportation impact study prepared by Mr. David Larson for the A-Boy Expansion/Dolan II/Resolution 95-61, TIF's are expected to recapture 32 percent of the traffic impact of new development on the Collector and Arterial Street system. The applicant will be required to pay TIF's of approximately $27,392 Based on the estimate that total TIF fees cover 32 percent of the impact on major street improvements citywide, a fee that would cover 100 percent of this projects traffic impact is $85,600 ($27,392 divided by .32) The difference between the TIF paid, and the full impact, is considered the unmitigated impact on the street system. The unmitigated impact of this project on the transportation system is $58,208. The applicant will also be conditioned to contribute to the cost of signalizing the two key intersections described previously. The cost of these improvements is expected to be as follows: Total impacts $58,208 Less TIF $27,392 Less Bike Lane improvements $ 512 Less Signalization 4,376 Total Unmitigated impacts $25,928 NOTICE OF TYPE II DECISION SDR2002-00006/JT ROTH OFFICE BUILDING PAGE 23 OF 25 As the value of the proposed improvements is less than the remaining unmitigated impact, it is clearly proportionate to exact these improvements. SECTION VIII. OTHER STAFF COMMENTS The City of Tigard Building Division has reviewed the proposal and offered the following comment: • All restrooms to be accessible per UBC chapter 11. The City of Tigard Public Works Department has reviewed the proposal has no objections to it. The City of Tigard Long Range Planning Division has reviewed the proposal has no objections to it. The City of Tigard Police Department has reviewed the proposal and offered the following comment: • Request detailed lighting plan for exterior. The City of Tigard Water Department has reviewed the proposal and found that the project is outside their service area and in TVWD jurisdiction. SECTION IX. AGENCY COMMENTS Clean Water Services has reviewed the proposal but offered no comments Tualatin Valley Water District has reviewed the proposal and offered the following comments: • Existing water line in SW 68th is 8 inches not 1 inches. • Locate 1 inch water meter adjacent to SW 68 , not ± 50 feet west of SW 68th on SW Beveland as shown on utility plan. The Tualatin Valley Fire and Rescue has reviewed the proposal and offered the following comments: • The minimum required fire flow is 2359 gpm @ 20 psi . Fire District records indicate the minimum required fire flow is available at the required fire hydrants. • A minimum of 2 fire hydrants shall be provided for this project. Fire hydrants shall be installed so that no part of the structure is more than 250 feet from a fire hydrant. The existing hydrants in the area are acceptable. • Fire hydrant locations shall be identified by the installation of reflective markers. The markers shall be blue. They shall be located adjacent and to the side of the centerline of the access roadway that the fire hydrant is located on. In case that there is no center line, then assume a centerline, and place the reflectors accordingly. • Approved fire apparatus access roadways and firefighting water supplies shall be installed and operational prior to stockpiling combustibles on-site or the commencement of combustible construction. • A Knox brand key box shall be provided on the building. Contact the Fire Marshal's Office for installation details and an application. NOTICE OF TYPE II DECISION SDR2002-00006/JT ROTH OFFICE BUILDING PAGE 24 OF 25 . A building survey and plans, in accordance with TVF&R Ordinance 99-01, Appendix III- F, shall be submitted. A copy of Appendix III-F, the building survey form and the instructions are available on the Fire District web site. To access this information via Internet, follow this link: http://www.tvfr.com/Departments/FireMarshal/newconstruction.htm PGE, Verizon, Tri-Met, Qwest, and ODOT have all reviewed the proposal, but did not offer any comments. SECTION X. PROCEDURE AND APPEAL INFORMATION Notice: Notice was posted at City Hall and mailed to: X The applicant and owners X Owner of record within the required distance X Affected government agencies Final Decision: THIS DECISION IS FINAL ON JULY 22, 2002 AND BECOMES EFFECTIVE ON AUGUST 6, 2002 UNLESS AN APPEAL IS FILED. Appeal The decision of the Director (Type II Procedure) or Review Authority (Type II Administrative Appeal or Type III Procedure) is final for purposes of appeal on the date that it is mailed. Any party with standing as provided in Section 18.390.040.G.1. may appeal this decision in accordance with Section 18.390.040.G.2. of the Tigard Community Development Code which provides that a written appeal together with the required fee shall be filed with the Director within ten (10) business days of the date the notice of the decision was mailed. The appeal fee schdule and forms are available from the Planning Division of Tigard City Hall, 13125 SW Hall Boulevard, Tigard, Oregon 97223. Unless the applicant is the appellant, the hearing on an appeal from the Director's Decision shall be confined to the specific issues identified in the written comments submitted by the parties during the comment period. Additional evidence concerning issues properly raised in the Notice of Appeal may be submitted by any party during the appeal hearing, subject to any additional rules of procedure that may be adopted from time to time by the appellate body. THE DEADLINE FOR FILING AN APPEAL IS AT 5:00 PM ON AUGUST 5, 2002. Questions: If you have any questions, please call the City of Tigard Planning Division, Tigard City Hall, 13125 SW Hall Boulevard, Tigard, Oregon at (503) 639-4171. -�'. July 22, 2002 PREPARED BY: rad Kilby DATE Associate Planner mil__._ C-- -; Pitochr July 22, 2002 APPROVED BY: Richard Bewersd. • DATE Planning ManaE er NOTICE OF TYPE II DECISION SDR2002-00006/JT ROTH OFFICE BUILDING PAGE 25 OF 25 _ 11, 1 CITY of TIG , • i ."---N i / GEOGRAPHIC INFORMATION SYSTEM SW DOUGLAS DR VICINITY MAP - ____________ i 1 fwlIllLjlIll ¢a SDR2002-00006 ELMHURST ST 21MN a JT ROTH OFFICE II `° � � BUILDING Illailit w w. > FRANKLIN ST • �� I RS FERN \```t CS FEA 1��4 r - sAllicr .. • l himas 4 i 111 . 9ULkRR. , i. SO.NrfA MIL 'p,� Z j ' NI■ r' TfSd ✓SaHMp RD GONZAGA ST 1 o � N r 111111 _____ \ H O < 0.-1111 100 200 300 400 Feet SW N 1, 324 feet HAMPTON ST 11lJ�,i City of Tigard __ Information on this map is for general location only and . �. I should be verified with the Development Services Division. h'• JI 13125 SW Hell Blvd /v, i SW PiAME TI(503)639-4171 97223 hltpalwww.c.ligard.or.us Community Development Plot date:Jun 11,2002;C:lmagic\MAGIC03.APR '° / ° / we or _ IA /i/y am . 7� EXISTING PARKING N/// PARKING I t LANDSCAPING ( ` ,l I / VISUAL v u '� CLEARENCE I TRASH ENCLOSEd 1 to L J I •. ' 0.1• ., W.. T AREA .1110.-••- •11111111111 i 3-SPACE 4 io , �e S- ACT SPACES•4-' BIKE P G .' ,we STR -'. �L .I W—.-I.„--.. v 161114 b = . ri 11 k h. k 1.y Z Imo: . *71, a LLI 4 I 1 .�- R b y mr. S li Q 4 9 .�.0 V L_ A I•- 0 t V x � o_ BUILDING 1� '� C> ' 0 II I. e m r . MAIN FLR 3652. SOFT. Dr. ^ , 2ND FLR 3x92 SQFT. 7634. SOFT. I ji i ,% • b- •.P PAC lS•9-I" 2•STAND SPACES P 12'-0' i CRK 111 1 141 YMTN wn EXIST CITY IDEWALK— 4 h I A j, w• y y y "rd y w.,• y ,,•W. j rx ra Exit.rR.tr uwr SW BEVELAND STREE A.m0fn� c CITY OF TIGARD t SDR2002-00006 �wMli mum srrE PLAN N ROTH OFFICE BUILDING (Map is not to scale) EX P R JT Roth Construction, Inc. SDR2002-00006 12600 SW 72nd Avenue, Suite 200 JT ROTH OFFICE BUILDING Tigard, OR 97223 ,.el�L it AFFIDAVIT OF MAILING CIT'L YOFTIGARD Community(Development Shaping Better Community I, cPatricia L. Lunsford, being first duly sworn/affirm, on oath depose and say that I am a Senior Administrative Specialist for the City of'Tigard;Washington County, Oregon and that I served the following: (Check Appropriate Box(s)Below) © NOTICE OF DECISION FOR: SDR2002-00006/JT ROTH OFFICE BUILDING ❑ AMENDED NOTICE (File No./Name Reference) ® City of Tigard Planning Director A copy of the said notice being hereto attached, marked Exhibit"A", and by reference made a part hereof, was mailed to each named person(s) at the address(s) shown on the attached list(s), marked Exhibit"B", and by reference made a part hereof, on July 22,2002, and deposited in the United States Mail on July 22,2002, postage prepaid. ,i — -.,/ , /.f.e., ./ .4rA Alik,:_... / of (Person at Prepared Tice) / S2A'l1E of OEGoW ) County o f Washington )ss. City of Tigard ) Subscribed and sworn/affirmed before me on the /3 day /of c , 2002. 0,:t OFFICIAL SEAL ■` DIANE M JELOE'SKS �/ "'•.. / NOTARY PUBLIC-OREGON [ tt� '" COMMISSION NO.326578 NOTARY PUBLII,O / /�F 0'E MY COMMISSION EXPIRES 5EPT 07,2003 My Commission Expir. :. V7A3 . . EXrn _ NOTICE OF TYPE II DECISION SITE DEVELOPMENT REVIEW (SDR) 2002-00006 'L CITY OF TIGARD JT ROTH OFFICE BUILDING Community ty� rCoommnt Shaping Better 120 DAYS = 9/28/2002 SECTION I. APPLICATION SUMMARY FILE NAME: JT ROTH OFFICE BUILDING CASE NO.: Site Development Review (SDR) SDR2002-00006 PROPOSAL: The applicant is requesting Site Development Review for construction of a two-story, 7,634 square foot office building in the Tigard Triangle. The property is 17,866 square feet in size, and currently vacant. A portion of the property is surplus right-of-way that is being sold to the applicant. APPLICANT\ JT Roth Construction, Inc. OWNER: City of Tigard OWNER: 12600 SW 72nd, Suite 200 13125 SW Hall Blvd. Portland, OR 97223 Tigard, OR 97223 LOCATION: The property is located on the corner of 68th and Beveland and is described as, WCTM 2S101AA, Tax Lots 8300, 8500, 8600 and 8700. ZONE: MUE. Mixed Use Employment. The MUE zoning district is designed to apply to a majority of the land within the Tigard Triangle, a regional mixed-use employment district bounded by Pacific Highway (Hwy. 99), Highway 217 and 1-5. This zoning district permits a wide range of uses including major retail goods and services, business/professional offices, civic uses and housing; the latter includes multi-family housing at a maximum density of 25 units/acre, equivalent to the R-25 zoning district. A wide range of uses, including but not limited to community recreation facilities, religious institutions, medical centers, schools, utilities and transit-related park-and-ride lots, are permitted conditionally. APPLICABLE REVIEW CRITERIA: Community Development Code Chapters 18.360, 18.390, 18.520, 18.620, 18.705, 18.725, 18.745, 18.755, 18.765, 18.780, 18.790, 18.795 and 18.810. SECTION II . DECISION Notice is hereby given that the City of Tigard Community Development Director's designee has APPROVED the above Site Development Review request subject to certain conditions of approval. The findings and conclusions on which the decision is based are noted in the full decision, available at City Hall. THIS APPROVAL SHALL BE VALID FOR 18 MONTHS FROM THE EFFECTIVE DATE OF THIS DECISION. All documents and applicable criteria in the above-noted file are available for inspection at no cost or copies can be obtained for twenty-five cents (250 per page, or the current rate charged for copies at the time of the request. SECTION III. PROCEDURE AND APPEAL INFORMATION Notice: Notice mailed to: X The applicant and owners X Owner of record within the required distance X Affected government agencies Final Decision: THIS DECISION IS FINAL ON JULY 22, 2002 AND BECOMES EFFECTIVE ON AUGUST 6, 2002 UNLESS AN APPEAL IS FILED. Apkeat The Director's Decision is final on the date that it is mailed. All persons entitled to notice or who are otherwise adversely affected or aggrieved by the decision as provided in Section 18.390.040.G.1 may appeal this decision in accordance with Section 18.390.040.G.2 of the Tigard Community Development Code which provides that a written appeal together with the required fee shall be filed with the Director within ten (10) business days of the date the Notice of Decision was mailed. The appeal fee schedule and forms are available from the Planning Division of Tigard City Hall, 13125 SW Hall Boulevard, Tigard, Oregon 97223. Unless the applicant is the appellant, the hearing on an appeal from the Director's Decision shall be confined to the specific issues identified in the written comments submitted by the parties during the comment period. Additional evidence concerning issues properly raised in the Notice of Appeal may be submitted by any party during the appeal hearing, subject to any additional rules of procedure that may be adopted from time to time by the appellate body. I THE DEADLINE FOR FILING AN APPEAL IS 5:00 PM ON AUGUST 5, 2002. I Questions: For further information please contact the Planning Division Staff Planner, Brad Kilby at (503) 639-4171, Tigard City Hall, 13125 SW Hall Boulevard, Tigard, Oregon 97223. Jr .. VICINITY MAP a NM 1 E I ILM - 1 MMURST ST a■ ��SDR2002 00006 ' I I =IMI JT ROTH OFFICE Hi Jr� Io,:: BUILDING NW off rl I , H EN „In 1111 %.■u I,�,� Nem. R �. : s S i F. MIN ill- -ME ONZAGA••• <II- __ = MN r--- :.. ..■.. - N _- ...I.. sW -I-= ... ....... HAMPTON ST ill .1.11 IN •• Cityiy o® I •O ...,`........,.....,..,r . -- rwr..rwu—n. UMASSA. w.w►w— 1,ars a RMRx4G/ S LANGKAPIna I \VW RARRiRG� { fl� �Q l owµ L / \ TI Aw Dc4Owa I • haIOCR f J I M . w �— MG — `JO . .. rte,. 1`. bill — , I.i ' , 1 '° a l� �C�I _ I ., 1 = , I I \° t b. 4 M IDuiuDIN; ; MAW %S2 - = M y, - 2AD PLR v II —un}cm ralliga rot... - - ■MEIRIMIMINIMMIII •l��I SW\LAND STREE .,Iii. CITY OF TIGARD t SDR2002.00006 sner N ROTH OFFICE BUILDING (Map Is not to scale) 2S 101 AD-01600 2S 1 O1 AA-09700 68TH STREET INVESTORS LLC DANA MARK R 12670 SW 68TH AVE STE 300 12585 SW 68TH AVE TIGARD,OR 97223 TIGARD,OR 97223 2S101AA-08100 2S101AA-08301 A&R LLC DEFOE CHARLES E JR& 12480 SW 68TH PKWY STE A MCGEE JUDITH A TIGARD,OR 97223 12455 SW 68TH AVE PORTLAND,OR 97223 2S1 01 AB-02300 2S 101 AA-08200 BOLON DEAN N D OE CHARL . E JR& 4022 NE LADDINGTON CT MCG'. J ! H A PORTLAND,OR 97232 1245 •:TH AVE P:'TLAND, • 97223 2S 101 AB-02200 2S 101 AD-00803 CASEY EDWARD L JR&JOANNE F EQUITY GROUP FUND 1 LLC 7085 SW BEVELAND RD BY KURT DALBEY PORTLAND,OR 97223 7125 SW HAMPTON PORTLAND,OR 97223 2S101AA-07700 2S101AD-00800 CHORUBY PAUL N .` ITY GRO " FUND 1 LLC 12520 SW 68TH AVE#A BY .'T P• BEY TIGARD,OR 97223 712 :0 .AMPTON •RTLAND, :R 97223 2S 101 AA-07100 2S 101 AD-01700 CORLISS JAMES L&CORA ES. TY GRO ' FUND 1 LLC 9750 SW INEZ BY K 'T LBEY TIGARD,OR 97224 712 :n •AMPTON •RTLAND, SR 97223 2S 101 AA-07800 2S 101 AC-00100 CORLISS JAMES L&CORA K ETZEL DAVID M&NADINE M PO BOX 23970 13400 SW DOE LN TIGARD,OR 97281 TIGARD,OR 97223 2 101 AA-05700 2S 101 AA-04900 CO S J S L&CORA K FAIRMARK INVESTMENTS LLC POB(2 0 PO BOX 901 T CARD,OR 9 281 TUALATIN,OR 97062 101 AA-05500 2S 101 AD-02400 COR ES L&CORA K GEORGE FOX UNIVERSITY PO B 2 ATTN: FINANCIAL AFFAIRS TIGARD,OR 97281 414 N MERIDIAN NEWBERG,OR 97132 2S 101 AD-01000 25101 AB-01000 CUTSHALL THELMA HAMPTON PARK LLC 12705 SW 67TH AVE BY WEST COAST MORTGAGE TIGARD,OR 97223 5837 JEAN RD LAKE OSWEGO,OR 97035 2S101AB-00800 2S101AA-09600 14. • 'TON P 'K LLC PEIRCE STEPHEN W& BY W OAST MORTGAGE PEIRCE LYNN L 583 A •J 12560 SW 70TH L E OSWEGO,OR 97035 TIGARD,OR 97223 2S101AA-06700 2S101AA-09108 LANDMARK FORD INC R&D PROPERTY DEVELOPMENT LLC PO BOX 23970 12559 SW 69TH AVE TIGARD,OR 97281 TIGARD,OR 97223 2S101AA-04300 2S101AA-08500 L •I A' ORD INC ROTH J T JR&THERESA PO :%' 0 12600 SW 72ND AVE STE 200 GARD,OR 97281 TIGARD,OR 97223 2S101AA-05200 2S101AA-08300 LA '0 A: FORD INC RO T Jr . THERESA PO ::' • 970 1260' :It D AVE STE 200 ARD,OR '7281 T ARD,OR 9 -3 2S 101 AB-02400 2S 101 AA-08700 LANFARM LLC RO T J THERESA 16869 SW 65TH AVE STE 166 12600 AVE STE 200 LAKE OSWEGO, OR 97035 T ARD,OR 97223 2S101AA-04500 2S101AA-09800 LOUIE PROPERTY MANAGEMENT LLC R J T THERESA ATTN: RICHARD C LOUIE 1260 2ND AVE STE 200 12381 SW WALNUT ST ARD,OR 223 TIGARD,OR 97223 2S 101 AD-02700 2S 101 AB-02500 MCCROSKEY JOHN B SHIM STEVE S&JANET H 1380 MORNING SKY CT 14347 SW KOVEN CT LAKE OSWEGO,OR 97034 TIGARD,OR 97224 2S 101 AD-02800 2S 101 AA-07900 MORTON DON R AND CYNTHIA SUE SPRINGER JERRY&C DIANNE TRS BY MAIL MEMONDAY-N JOHANNE 7400 SW FAIRWAY DR 3109 NE BROADWAY WILSONVILLE,OR 97070 PORTLAND,OR 97232 2S101AD-01400 2S101AA-08302 OREGON KI SOCIETY SZAMBELAN PETER J&ELOISE M 12700 SW 68TH AVE 3258 LAKEVIEW BLVD TIGARD,OR 97223 LAKE OSWEGO,OR 97035 2S101AD-00100 2$ 01AA-08600 PARROTT VIAL LLC TIG D C OF 12725 SW 66TH AVE#202 1312 HALL PORTLAND,OR 97223 T_ ARD,0 97223 2 101 AA-0880 TIG D Y OF 131 HALL T ARD,0 97223 2S101AA-09100 TIGARD CORPORATE CENTER LTD PARTNERSHIP ATTN: GREG SPECHT 15400 MILLIKAN WAY BEAVERTON,OR 97006 2S101AA-03800 T GARD CORPOR• ' CENTER LIP -ARTNE:' IP ATTN: s:"G SPECHT 1540' ILL •N WAY AVERTON, •' 97006 2S 101 AA-06400 TING ELON&SYLVIA BY WILLIAM R SOUTHARD 603 SE VICTORY AVE STE 100 VANCOUVER,WA 98661 2S 101 AD-02900 TRIANGLE TERRACE LLC 12600 SW 72ND AVE#200 TIGARD,OR 97223 2S 101 AC-00300 WEAVER MICHAEL D&GAIL B 7075 SW GONZAGA ST TIGARD,OR 97223 2 S 101 AA-07600 WILHELM MICHAEL W TR 13085 SW 124TH AVE TIGARD,OR 97223 2S101AB-02800 ZEEK VELMA EDWARDS 7060 SW BEVELAND TIGARD,OR 97223 Jack Biethan 11023 SW Summerfield Drive, #4 Tigard, OR 97224 Sue Rorman 11250 SW 82nd Avenue Tigard, OR 97223 Naomi Gallucci 11285 SW 78th Avenue Tigard, OR 97223 Michael Trigoboff 7072 SW Barbara Lane Tigard, OR 97223 Dieter Jacobs 7775 SW Spruce Street Tigard, OR 97223 Alexander Craghead 12205 SW Hall Boulevard Tigard, OR 97223-6210 David Chapman 9840 SW Landau Place Tigard, OR 97223 Nathan and Ann Murdock PO Box 231265 Tigard, OR 97281 Brad Spring 7555 SW Spruce Street Tigard, OR 97223 CITY OF TIGARD - EAST CIT SUBCOMMITTEE (i:lcurpinlsetupllabels\CIT East.doc) UPDATED: April 18, 2002 .l..vffT of l I I CITY of TIGARD Inn / I\ II GEOGRAPHIC INFORMATION SYSTEM SW DOUGLAS DR VICINITY MAP w ■ SDR2002-00006 _ ELMHURST ST I ON Ii—_ii w JT RO TH OFFICE rn 3 3 BUILDING NIT•--iiwily III air • FANKLIN ST t A- Iiiii, •SEER Illitaill BEVELAND ST ■ N`` .UL; �oz l 11.1 III Z > BE BEND RD.N I r5 GONZAGA ST Tegar4 Mee Mp. r _ _(D N IIIIIII 111112 \ 0 100 200 300 400 Feet . MI SW 1".1"•324 feet HAMPTON ST Au. ,,, City of Tigard Information on this map is for general location only and ll• should be verified with the Development Services Division. rms 13125 SW Hall Blvd Tigard,OR 97223 >. SW FAME (503)639-1171 �,il I I http:/www.ci.tigard.or.us Community Development Plot date:Jun 11,2002;C:lmagic\MAGIC03.APR MO / or or / . ry wv ry / / ~ / M1W / :///frfi) //� _ TI � W 7'� EXISTING PARKING n n NEXIST PARKING I t LANDSCAPING 11 1 I U —� VISUAL I TRASH ENCLOSE Di 1 1�°�-� AREA ENCE L w.* w. • S, r.. I w-,. TW �/ 3-SPACE � ��1 b S ` BIKE PAR G -STANDARD SP �``. A euR• --'4. kol• R iii ' LLI ILI aHr • x r W ma1T 6 W t a E_0 x L- o D It 41Rr 6 3 o 3 � 0 t o - o BUILDING X IA �• m arr. rr. . MAIN FLR 3652. SOFT. e 39 . a 7 2ND FLR 82 SOFT, JI 7634, SOFT, } n S-C• PAC BPAC.S• --I. 2 STAND•-'- 5P • 5•12'-0' i LVR _ •� o�t_ / Lac ett IIK rat wrM f ® Rur t R EXISt CITY %IDEW -- ALK d C I I h y w s• y /SW y y 2,.-. y W.6. y t I ,,..r .. w r.r our STRUT Li.r j,<, SW BEVELAND STREE A CITY OF TIGARD 11/4 SDR2002-00006 cm«TIGARD SITE PLAN N ROTH OFFICE BUILDING (Map is not to scale) v‘. Olt... I.1 .:....( ;),.a.....=:. 2t ,-*id"' cb '" C:..4..*C Ot ) IND '45E> C:6, ?N, (--- ---7 4IP tr.. M City of Tigard Planning Division X W „ Afil 13125 S Hall Boulevard (TT _ CITY OF TIGARD Tigard, Oregon 97223 -- _ - - 2S 101 AD-02800 M CYNTHIA SUE BY MAIL MEMOND N JOHANNE 31 BROADWAY PORTLAND,OR 97232 MAIL1O9 972323081 1601 17 06/13/0? FORWARD TIME EXP RTN TO SEND MAIL ME MONDAY INC 4800 5W GRIFFITI DR STE 128 BEAVERTON OR 97005-8700 RETURN TO SENDER Cs •.:wc' 4,-;;x . 1 i I t i I I I .. i .. { .t yy t . ..= :..:_.-„ iIEiEEl niliiiiIiliEiiEIIEiiniii iEihilithlu iEEiilIEIn h i A ilEl:lelix:i111 �- CITY of TIGARD W /r GEOGRAPHIC INFORMATION SYSTEM low II • Q VICINITY MAP ELMHURST ST f SDR2002-00006 ■ Wrilliiy TROTH OFFICE m CO -- - BUILDING �Olea»»» > licr Q II FRANKLIN ST � meaxraw a».a»,» mom, `` �'!,.\\�t..e'�\\ BEVELAND \__ _..: all mea»rw -lip&�y 101111.1111111 mua» 00 110111111 :a _ Q meas»w `� A � 0 N `---- � ;m »E» mtaa » ■ti LI Tigad Area Map GONZAGA ST rm.a�ea» I=— N co Mill z nhflaoo,Faa CO (O �i 0 100 200 300 400 Fe-t CD i ��/ 1"=324 feet _ Ellil • SYY MINI HAMPTON ST city Ailk ofrga / r. ;�U P DATA D PROPERTY Information on this map is for general location only and should be verified with the Development Services Division. WNER MAILING LIST) 13125 SW Hall Blvd Tigard,OR 97223 (503)639-4171 http alwvw.ci.tiga b.or.us Community Development Plot date Jun 11,2002:C:\magic\MAGIC03.APR 2S101AD-01600 2S101AA-09700 68TH STREET INVESTORS LLC DANA MARK R 12670 SW 68TH AVE STE 300 12585 SW 68TH AVE TIGARD, OR 97223 TIGARD,OR 97223 25101AA-08100 2S101AA-08301 A&R LLC DEFOE CHARLES E JR& 12480 SW 68TH PKWY STE A MCGEE JUDITH A TIGARD,OR 97223 12455 SW 68TH AVE PORTLAND,OR 97223 2S101AB-02300 25101AA-08200 BOLON DEAN N D OE CHARL ' E JR& 4022 NE LADDINGTON CT MCG' J ► HA PORTLAND,OR 97232 1245 :A •:TH AVE P.•TLAND, •- 97223 2S1 01 AB-02200 2S1 01 AD-00803 CASEY EDWARD L JR&JOANNE F EQUITY GROUP FUND 1 LLC 7085 SW BEVELAND RD BY KURT DALBEY PORTLAND,OR 97223 7125 SW HAMPTON PORTLAND,OR 97223 2S101AA-07700 2S101AD-00800 CHORUBY PAUL N E` ITY GRO • FUND 1 LLC 12520 SW 68TH AVE#A BY .'T P• BEY TIGARD, OR 97223 712 :n .AMPTON r6RTLAND, 3 R 97223 2S101AA-07100 25101AD-01700 CORLISS JAMES L&CORA ES. TY GRO • FUND 1 LLC 9750 SW INEZ BY K 'T !•LBEY TIGARD, OR 97224 712 :n .AMPTON ••RTLAND, 0R 97223 2S101AA-07800 2S101AC-00100 CORLISS JAMES L&CORA K ETZEL DAVID M&NADINE M PO BOX 23970 13400 SW DOE LN TIGARD,OR 97281 TIGARD,OR 97223 2 101AA-05700 2S101AA-04900 CO S JS L&CORA K FAIRMARK INVESTMENTS LLC PO BOX 2 0 PO BOX 901 TIGARD, OR 9'1281 TUALATIN,OR 97062 101 AA-05500 2S 101 AD-02400 COR ES L&CORA K GEORGE FOX UNIVERSITY PO BOX 2 ATTN: FINANCIAL AFFAIRS TIGARD,OR 97281 414 N MERIDIAN NEWBERG,OR 97132 2S101AD-01000 25101AB-01000 CUTSHALL THELMA HAMPTON PARK LLC 12705 SW 67TH AVE BY WEST COAST MORTGAGE TIGARD,OR 97223 5837 JEAN RD LAKE OSWEGO,OR 97035 2S101AB-00800 2S101AA-09600 H TON PARK LLC PEIRCE STEPHEN W& BY W COAST MORTGAGE PEIRCE LYNN L 583 A p 12560 SW 70TH E OSWEGO,OR 97035 TIGARD,OR 97223 2S101AA-06700 2S101AA-09108 LANDMARK FORD INC R&D PROPERTY DEVELOPMENT LLC PO BOX 23970 12559 SW 69TH AVE TIGARD,OR 97281 TIGARD,OR 97223 2S101AA-04300 2S101AA-08500 L AgK'(ORD INC ROTH J T JR&THERESA PO 0 12600 SW 72ND AVE STE 200 ARD,OR 97281 TIGARD,OR 97223 2S101AA-05200 2S101AA-08300 LA :∎ A: FORD INC RO TJ THERESA PO : ' 970 1260 D AVE STE 200 ARD,OR '7281 T ARD,OR 9 3 2S101AB-02400 2S101AA-08700 LANFARM LLC RO T THERESA 16869 SW 65TH AVE STE 166 1260 AVE STE 200 LAKE OSWEGO, OR 97035 T ARD,OR 97223 2S101AA-04500 2S101AA-09800 LOUIE PROPERTY MANAGEMENT LLC R J T THERESA ATTN: RICHARD C LOUIE 1260 2ND AVE STE 200 12381 SW WALNUT ST T ARD,OR`97223 TIGARD,OR 97223 2S101AD-02700 2S101AB-02500 MCCROSKEY JOHN B SHIM STEVE S&JANET H 1380 MORNING SKY CT 14347 SW KOVEN CT LAKE OSWEGO, OR 97034 TIGARD,OR 97224 2S101AD-02800 2S101AA-07900 MORTON DON R AND CYNTHIA SUE SPRINGER JERRY&C DIANNE TRS BY MAIL MEMONDAY-N JOHANNE 7400 SW FAIRWAY DR 3109 NE BROADWAY WILSONVILLE,OR 97070 PORTLAND,OR 97232 2S101AD-01400 2S101AA-08302 OREGON KI SOCIETY SZAMBELAN PETER J&ELOISE M 12700 SW 68TH AVE 3258 LAKEVIEW BLVD TIGARD, OR 97223 LAKE OSWEGO,OR 97035 2S101AD-00100 2S 01AA-08600 PARROTT VIAL LLC TIG D C OF 12725 SW 66TH AVE#202 1312 HALL PORTLAND,OR 97223 T, RD,0 97223 2 101 AA-0880 TIG D OF 131 HALL T ARD,0 97223 2S101AA-09100 TIGARD CORPORATE CENTER LTD PARTNERSHIP ATTN: GREG SPECHT 15400 MILLIKAN WAY BEAVERTON,OR 97006 2S101AA-03800 TIGARD CORPORATE CENTER LTD' ARTNEf grlIP ATTN: G SPECHT 15400 ILL N WAY BEAVERTON, 97006 2S101AA-06400 TING ELON&SYLVIA BY WILLIAM R SOUTHARD 603 SE VICTORY AVE STE 100 VANCOUVER,WA 98661 2S 101 AD-02900 TRIANGLE TERRACE LLC 12600 SW 72ND AVE#200 TIGARD,OR 97223 2S 101 AC-00300 WEAVER MICHAEL D&GAIL B 7075 SW GONZAGA ST TIGARD,OR 97223 2S101AA-07600 WILHELM MICHAEL W TR 13085 SW 124TH AVE TIGARD,OR 97223 2S 101 AB-02800 ZEEK VELMA EDWARDS 7060 SW BEVELAND TIGARD,OR 97223 Jack Biethan 11023 SW Summerfield Drive, #4 Tigard, OR 97224 Sue Rorman 11250 SW 82nd Avenue Tigard, OR 97223 Naomi Gallucci 11285 SW 78th Avenue Tigard, OR 97223 Michael Trigoboff 7072 SW Barbara Lane Tigard, OR 97223 Dieter Jacobs 7775 SW Spruce Street Tigard, OR 97223 Alexander Craghead 12205 SW Hall Boulevard Tigard, OR 97223-6210 David Chapman 9840 SW Landau Place Tigard, OR 97223 Nathan and Ann Murdock PO Box 231265 Tigard, OR 97281 Brad Spring 7555 SW Spruce Street Tigard, OR 97223 CITY OF TIGARD - EAST CIT SUBCOMMITTEE (i:lcurpin\setup\labels\CIT East.doc) UPDATED: April 18, 2002 assessor . txt Assessor Information Tax Lot Number: 101AA08300 Property Address : /2540 SW 69TH AVE Mailing Information: ROTH, J T JR & THERESA 12600 SW 72ND AVE, STE 200 TIGARD 97223 Assessor Taxlot Size : 0 . 12 (Acres) Building Square Footage : 0 (Square Feet) Assessed Land Value : $57630 Assessed Building Value : $0 Total Assessed Value : $57630 Last Sale Date : 07/17/98 Sale Price : $0 . 00 **** ASSESSOR INFORMATION **** Multiple Taxlots Tax Lot Number: 2S101AA08500 Property Address : 0 Mailing Information: ROTH, J T JR & THERESA 12600 SW 72ND AVE, STE 200 TIGARD 97223 Assessor Taxlot Size : 0 . 12 (Acres) Building Square Footage : 0 (Square Feet) Assessed Land Value : $57750 Assessed Building Value : $0 Total Assessed Value : $57750 Last Sale Date : 07/17/98 Sale Price : $0 . 00 Page 1 assessor . txt **** ASSESSOR INFORMATION **** Multiple Taxlots Tax Lot Number: $&201AA08700 Property Address : 0 Mailing Information: ROTH, J T JR & THERESA 12600 SW 72ND AVE, STE 200 TIGARD 97223 Assessor Taxlot Size : 0 . 10 (Acres) Building Square Footage : 0 (Square Feet) Assessed Land Value : $47270 Assessed Building Value : $0 Total Assessed Value : $47270 Last Sale Date : 07/17/98 Sale Price : $0 . 00 **** ASSESSOR INFORMATION **** Multiple Taxlots Tax Lot Number: 2S101AA08600 Property Address : 12525 SW 68TH AVE Mailing Information: TIGARD, CITY OF 13125 SW HALL TIGARD 97223 Assessor Taxlot Size: 0 . 23 (Acres) Building Square Footage : 0 (Square Feet) Assessed Land Value : $105000 Assessed Building Value : $21480 Total Assessed Value : $126480 Last Sale Date : Sale Price : $0 . 00 Page 2 L.__j Q ____ iii CITY of TIGARD GEOGRAPHIC INFORMATION SYSTEM 11 16111. 1 i ELMHURST ST AREA NOTIFIED - (500') I a) ao 251011111030/1 `� FOR: TIM ROTH 2510111AD55D0 W ?S10111800000 2s101aa05700 Q RE: 2S 101M-083009 „,, 8500, 8600, 8700 �N.44/ — 2311101043N 231011111145 1 2S101AB01000 FRANKLIN ST I ( , YSl 1311 7.77- Property owner information lf11111M$1 010.0,3. S101AAOB10 i 25101AA01900 is valid for 3 months from 251o111eo2200 '01001 the date printed on thi$map. • •$101AB02300 2S101AA06100 - _ k1. ELAND ST - -- `—"V \25101A11018o0 j 7' - \\�\\ . S1AAD76D 1 25101A002111 2S101AB02500 2S101AB02400 \ • 2S101AA0950I ,510111110910 2510111110980 15111AA0970 Q � 2S101AA07100 \ z tsiomcoo3o0 r _.._, Q (V 2slo1ACfl N- 1 1 2s101A0011D0 GONZAGA ST ./ pi. dr 2s11U11/112 N• 2S1010002000 1 251010000100 I 011100161 0111002400 0 100 CO mamma CO ` 200 300 Feet I I _ 1"=229 feet .114 2S101A002900 25mamma 41,14 A1 SW City of Tigard / , HAMPTON S T Information on this map is for general location only and should be verified with the Development Services Division. 13125 SW Hall Blvd s Tigard,OR 97223 (503)6394171 h t t p 11 www.d.ligard.or.u s Community Development Plot date:Feb 20,2002;C:lmagic\MAGIC03.APR • 2S1d1AD-01600 2S101AA-08200 68TH STREET INVESTORS LLC DEFOE CHARLES E JR& 12670 SW 68TH AVE STE 300 MCGEE JUDITH A TIGARD,OR 97223 12455 SW 68TH AVE PORTLAND,OR 97223 2S101AA-08100 101AA-08301 A&R LLC DE'•E CHARLES E 12480 SW 68TH PKWY STE A MCG ' UD • TIGARD, OR 97223 1245 .0 0 H AVE ••RTLAND,0"7223 2S101AB-02300 2S101AD-00800 BOLON DEAN N EQUITY GROUP FUND 1 LLC 4022 NE LADDINGTON CT BY KURT DALBEY PORTLAND,OR 97232 7125 SW HAMPTON PORTLAND,OR 97223 2S101AB-02200 101AD-01700 CASEY EDWARD L JR&JOANNE F EQ Y GROUP FUND 1 LLC 7085 SW BEVELAND RD BY KUR •ALB PORTLAND,OR 97223 7125 S 1 • "TON Pi' LAND,OR • 2S101AA-07700 2S101AD-00803 CHORUBY PAUL N ITY GROUP FU • 1 LLC 12520 SW 68TH AVE#A BY Kb'T DAL: TIGARD,OR 97223 7125 SW > PTON ••' AND,O' • 223 2S101AA-07100 2S101AC-00100 CORLISS JAMES L&CORA ETZEL DAVID M&NADINE M 9750 SW INEZ 13400 SW DOE LN TIGARD, OR 97224 TIGARD,OR 97223 2S101AA-07800 2S101AA-04900 CORLISS JAMES L&CORA K FAIRMARK INVESTMENTS LLC PO BOX 23970 PO BOX 901 TIGARD,OR 97281 TUALATIN, OR 97062 1J AA-05500 2S101AD-02400 CORLI ' •MES ORA K GEORGE FOX UNIVERSITY PO BOX • I ATTN: FINANCIAL AFFAIRS ••D,OR 97281 414 N MERIDIAN NEWBERG,OR 97132 1 AA-05700 2S 101 AB-00800 CORL E .-• K HAMPTON PARK LLC PO B• - 70 _ BY WEST COAST MORTGAGE ARD,OR 97281 5837 JEAN RD LAKE OSWEGO, OR 97035 2S101AA-09700 101AB-01000 DANA MARK R HA • ON PARK L 12585 SW 68TH AVE BY WES ••: MORTGAGE TIGARD, OR 97223 5837 J •D •'E OSWEGO,OR 9703 2S 101 AA-05200 2S 101 AA-09108 LANDMARK FORD INC R&D PROPERTY DEVELOPMENT LLC PO BOX 23970 12559 SW 69TH AVE TIGARD,OR 97281 TIGARD,OR 97223 2 101 AA-04300 2S 101 AA-08700 LA ARK FORD C ROTH J T JR&THERESA PO BO - • 12600 SW 72ND AVE STE 200 TI • I,OR 81 TIGARD,OR 97223 01 AA-06700 2S 101 AA-08300 LAN RK F INC R• - J T JR&THERESA PO BOX 12600 S • • • STE 200 T ,OR 97281 TIG •.,OR 972 2S101AB-02400 2S101AA-08500 LANFARM LLC '• J T JR&THERESA 16869 SW 65TH AVE STE 166 12600 ' N* ' • E 200 LAKE OSWEGO,OR 97035 T _ ':, SR 97 2S 101 AA-04500 2S 101 AA-09800 LOUIE PROPERTY MANAGEMENT LLC •: J T JR&THERESA ATTN: RICHARD C LOUIE 12600 • ND n 200 12381 SW WALNUT ST TIG•':, •• 972 TIGARD, OR 97223 23 101 AD-02700 25101 AB-02500 MCCROSKEY JOHN B SHIM STEVE S&JANET H 1380 MORNING SKY CT 14347 SW KOVEN CT LAKE OSWEGO, OR 97034 TIGARD,OR 97224 2S 101 AD-02800 2S 101 AA-07900 MORTON DON R AND CYNTHIA SUE SPRINGER JERRY&C DIANNE TRS BY MAIL MEMONDAY-N JOHANNE 7400 SW FAIRWAY DR 3109 NE BROADWAY WILSONVILLE,OR 97070 PORTLAND,OR 97232 2S 101 AD-01400 2S 101 AA-08302 OREGON KI SOCIETY SZAMBELAN PETER J&ELOISE M 12700 SW 68TH AVE 3258 LAKEVIEW BLVD TIGARD, OR 97223 LAKE OSWEGO,OR 97035 2 S 101 AD-00100 2S 101 AA-08800 PARROTT VIAL LLC TIGA CI F 12725 SW 66TH AVE#202 13125 LL PORTLAND,OR 97223 TI RD,OR 9 3 2S 101 AA-09600 25101 AA-0860 1 PEIRCE STEPHEN W& ' :. ' Y OF PEIRCE LYNN L 131 : S .ALL 12560 SW 70TH T ARD,OR 223 TIGARD,OR 97223 2S101AA-03800 TIGARD CORPORATE CENTER LTD PARTNERSHIP ATTN: GREG SPECHT 15400 MILLIKAN WAY BEAVERTON,OR 97006 101AA-09100 TI.ARD CORPORATE • ER LTD •RTNER - ATTN: SPECHT 1540P ILL •N WAY : AVERTON, •- ! 006 2S101AA-06400 TING ELON&SYLVIA BY WILLIAM R SOUTHARD 603 SE VICTORY AVE STE 100 VANCOUVER,WA 98661 2S101 AD-02900 TRIANGLE TERRACE LLC 12600 SW 72ND AVE#200 TIGARD, OR 97223 2S 101 AC-00300 WEAVER MICHAEL D&GAIL B 7075 SW GONZAGA ST TIGARD,OR 97223 2S101AA-07600 WILHELM MICHAEL W TR 13085 SW 124TH AVE TIGARD,OR 97223 2S 101 AB-02800 ZEEK VELMA EDWARDS 7060 SW BEVELAND TIGARD, OR 97223 • Jack Biethan 11023 SW Summerfield Drive, #4 Tigard, OR 97224 Sue Rorman 11250 SW 82nd Avenue Tigard, OR 97223 Naomi Gallucci 11285 SW 78th Avenue Tigard, OR 97223 Michael Trigoboff 7072 SW Barbara Lane Tigard, OR 97223 Dieter Jacobs 7775 SW Spruce Street Tigard, OR 97223 Alexander Craghead 12205 SW Hall Boulevard Tigard, OR 97223-6210 David Chapman 9840 SW Landau Place Tigard, OR 97223 Nathan and Ann Murdock PO Box 231265 Tigard, OR 97281 CITY OF TIGARD - EAST CIT SUBCOMMITTEE (i:\curpin\setup\labels\CIT East.doc) UPDATED: December 27, 2001 CITY OF TIGARD RECEIVED COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT 3-^""{ FEB 19 2002 ���� PLANNING DIVISION CITY OF TIGARD 13125 SW HALL BOULEVARD CITY OF TIGARD Community(Development PLANNING/ENGINEERING Shaping Better Community TIGARD, OREGON 97223 PHONE: 503.639-4171 FAX: 503-684-7297(Attn: Patty or Shirley/Planning) RQUESi FOR? 440 I II 'OP " _Y OWNER MAIEING;LIST, ,, Property owner information is valid for 3 months from the date of your request INDICATE ALL PROJECT MAP & TAX LOT NUMBERS (i.e. IS134A8, Tax Lot 00100) OR THE ADDRESSES FOR ALL PROJECT PARCELS BELOW and INCLUDE A MAP OF ALL OTS FORTE PROJECT (preferably assessor's tax map): a3to ( 44 - ,0 ,34d /95OD ��C� KZ(I) INDICATE WHETHER YOU ARE REQUESTIN 2 R 3 SETS OF LABELS: , (NOTE: A minimum of 2 sets of labels will be provided to p ace on your 2 sets of envelopes that applicants are required to submit at the time of application submittal. If a neighborhood meeting is required and you have not yet held that meeting, you should request 3 sets) NAME OF CONTACT PERSON: \ \ ' PHONE: sc: 3 R`SG - Z6 39 This request may be mailed, faxed, or hand delivered to the City of Tigard. Please allow a 2-day minimum for processing requests. Upon completion of your request, the contact person will be called to pick up their request in "Will Call" by their last name, at the Community Development Reception Desk. The cost of processing your request must be paid at the time of pick up, as exact cost can not be pre-determined. PLEASE NOTE: FOR REASONS OF ACCURACY, ONLY ORIGINAL MAILING LABELS PROVIDED BY THE CITY VS. RE-TYPED MAILING LABELS WILL BE ACCEPTED. Cost Description: $11 to generate the mailing list, plus $2 per sheet for printing the list onto labels (20 addresses per sheet). Then, multiply the cost to print one set of labels by the number of sets requested. *EXAMPLE * * * COST FOR THIS REQUEST * * ..4_sheets of labels x $2/sheet = $8.00 x_2_ sets = $16.00 3 sheet(s) of labels x $2/sheet = $ G x .z sets = Si 2 _2_ sheets of labels x $2/sheet for CIT area x sets = $ 4.00 /_ sheet(s) of labels x $2/sheet for CIT area = $Z x 2 sets = S Li GENERATE LIST = $1100 GENERATE LIST = $11.00 TOTAL = $31.00 TOTAL = $,'Z7 SITE DEVELOPMENT REVIEW ^J !+� TYPE II APPLICATION CITY OF TIGARD 13125 SW Hall Blvd., Tigard, OR 97223(503) 639-4171 FAX:(503) 684-7297 GENERAL INFORMATION PRE-APP.HELD WITH: N,,� DATE OF PRE-APP.: ( Property Address/Location(s): 5 J 4.8T`+ SZiielZUNC FOR STAFF USE ONLY Tax Map &Tax Lot#(s):o25 /0 / Case No.(s): S 2-A DO Z-boon c, g3a5, 8:Sev, 860, 8700 Other Case No.(s):Pft-c,Z;y - 000//Receipt No.:��2.- / 3 3 y Site Size: /7 S66 S•F I L Application-Accepted By: LIP Applicant*: V • T. 2.77,1....A674--s+vc/l .�- Date: `/i)L Address: /„24 c 540 V"'Ave, #Zoo Date Determined Complete: City/State: �2T OTL Zip: 972.13 Rev.8/21/2001 lAcurpintmasters\revised\sdra.doc Primary Contact: 77/44 Peril Phone: 53 639 2639 Fax: Sc3 624 0239 REQUIRED SUBMITTAL ELEMENTS Property Owner/Deed Holder(s)*: (Attach list if more than one) (Note: applications will not be accepted without the required submittal elements) 5a.s.tc_ .AS adoovL " Address: Phone: C9 Application Form City/State: Zip: - Owner's Signature/Written Authorization •#7 ,c £.r 840a iS C /'- oF"T7a rd earl //4�iy Cad Title Transfer Instrument or Deed *When the owner and the applicant are different people, the applicant Copy of Pre-Application Conf. Notes must be the purchaser of record or a lessee in possession with written authorization from the owner or an agent of the owner. The owner(s) E/ Site/Plot Plan must sign this application in the space provided on the back of this (#of copies based on pre-app check list) form or submit a written authorization with this application. LI Site/Plot Plan (reduced 8'/1"x 11") PROPOSAL SUMMARY [y Applicant's Statement (#of copies based on pre-app check list) The owners of record of the subject property request Site El CWS Sewer Use Information Card Development Review approval to allow(please be specific): (Distributed/completed at application submittal) LAGGttdt 6 S• . Ld' CWS Service Provider Letter _CAI, /254510 W/qX Ids 7�S•1(' [� 2 Sets of Pre-Addressed/Pre-Stamped (A` / -//�,,_ #10 Envelopes & Copy of 500' Property ipar/ (i5 5411(f), .5, ioCs, 4,-ote'isexvt• Owner List Generated by the City '� JaJi_ a41 [LUQ � ® Neighborhood Mtg. Affidavits& Notes ctioo lico o c.. afould iv ;0...44 71;(.. 76 ❑ Filing Fee: (Under$100,000) $ 800.00 (5100,0004999,ags) $1,600.00 ($1 Million&Over) $1,780.00 (+55/510,000 over the first million) Urban: (See Washington County fee schedule) 1 • r List any VARIANCE, CONDITIONAL USE, SENSITIVE LANDS, OR OTHER LAND USE ACTIONS to be considered as part of this application: N/A APPLICANTS: To consider an application complete, you will need to submit ALL of the REQUIRED SUBMITTAL ELEMENTS as described on the front of this application in the "Required Submittal Elements" box. (Detailed Submittal Requirement Information sheets can be obtained, upon request,for all types of Land Use Applications.) THE APPLICANT(S) SHALL CERTIFY THAT: • The above request does not violate any deed restrictions that may be attached to or imposed upon the subject property. • If the application is granted, the applicant will exercise the rights granted in accordance with the terms and subject to all the conditions and limitations of the approval. • All of the above statements and the statements in the plot plan, attachments, and exhibits transmitted herewith, are true; and the applicants so acknowledge that any permit issued, based on this application, may be revoked if it is found that any such statements are false. • The applicant has read the entire contents of the application, including the policies and criteria, and understands the requirements for approving or denying the application. SIGNATURES of each owner of the subject property. DATED this day of 444P , 20 0-2-- 6 'er s S 'nature Owner's Signature Owner's Signature Owner's Signature 2 TualatinValley Water District 1850 SW 170th Ave.•P.O.Box 745•Beaverton,Oregon 97075.503/642-1511 •FAX:503/649-2733 Gregory E.DiLoreto General Manager October 22, 2002 Bernice Bagnall Chief Financial Officer Todd Heidgerken J.T. ROTH CONSTRUCTION Manager, Community 12600 SW 72ND AVENUE, SUITE 200 &Intergovernmental Relations TIGARD OR 97223 Dale Fishback AREA BETWEEN SW 68TH AND 69TH IN VICINITY OF SW BEVELAND Manager. Operations &Field Services area between and SW the of Street i The land ar..a between SW 68 _nd SW 69th in _he vicinity o- SW Reveland �.tr_et is within the boundary of the Tualatin Valley Water District. You specifically Brenda Lennox mentioned tax lots 8300 and 8700. I could not locate tax lot 8300 on the Washington Manager,Customer& g Support Services County GIS information system. Tax lot 8700 is located between SW 68th and SW 69th immediately north of the northerly extension of SW Beveland. Tualatin Valley Gary Pippin Water District is able to service this property as a customer. Manager. Engineering Services If you have any questions please call the office. Debra Erickson Human Resources Coordinator Stewart L. Davis, P.E. Senior Engineer WATER - not to be taken for granted UV' 14' Ur 1J..L VUUV V J V11a aa�aa.+. ara.rav✓:aa. .•v+ PO BOX B20 5ljg1NOOd'OR 97140 Pride Disposal Company Phone'503-625.6177 Fax 503-2254179 Fax Tel T J Roth,Jr. Fro.= ROSE BOVVI ES CIO Craig Fac 503-624-0239 Data June 14, 2002 Phones 503-639-2639 Pages: 1 — Re: Proposed development CC! Corner of S.W,68Th&Beveland Tigard, OR _ ❑ Urgent 0 For Review ❑ Please Comment ❑ Please Reply ❑ Please Recycle •Commnitits: Jim, This is to confirm 10' x 12' is approved for you to go ahead with your plans. Thank you, Craig . Rie STATE OF OREGON County of Washington 86 I,Jerry np,pq,} of Assess- ment Jerry p � to County Clerk for, ddourlfyi�1Q, qr rtfly that the wlthlgTn trwrlaru }�yr-M W and reppryo 1 '�"'�'!'�' 'received rt county ,k1' „Y11>�t, oklot said � :I' ce t' rry groo t5lrootor of Q'3rnprr OevvvrQfuM lark Taxation,Ex- Doc : 99049182 Rectt 230224 51,00 04/21/1999 03130:31pm I - s RETURN r.r J.7'.RMh,Jr. 13779 NW 72w 0200 Go 7'IIard,Or,97223 2 File No. z NO CHANGE IN TAX STATEMENT EASEMENT FOR ACCESS and DRIVEWAY $ g' I•OR M010R VEHICLE DRIVEWAY ON AAJOLNINU PARCELS COMMERCIAL USE Date: April, 19 99 Grantor: J.T.Roth,Jr.and Theresa A.Roth 13779 SW Charleston Ln. Tigard,Or.97224 RECITALS WHEREAS,Grantor is the owner in fee simple of several parcels of land described as: Parcel 1: 2S101AA 8301; Lot 5,Block 29, West Portland Heights,City of Tigard,County of Washington Co.,State of Oregon, Parcel 2: 2S101AA 8300; Lots 1,2,3,4,9,10 West Portland Heights,City of Tigard,County of Washington,State of Oregon. Parcel 3: 2S101AA 8200 Lots 6,7,8,35,36 West Portland Heights, City of Tigard,County of Washington,State of Oregon, Parcel 4: 2S101AA8500 Lots 33,34 West Portland Heights,City of Tigard, County of N Washington,State of Oregon. and said parcels of real estate adjoin each other. g WHEREAS,the Grantor of this Agreement desires to create a common driveway and access casement,described below,on Lots 5,9,10,34,35 and 36 for the benefit of the public for driveway purposes to benefit Lots 1,2,3,4,5,6,7,8,9, 10,33,34,35,and 36 of Block 29,West Portland Heights,County of Washington,State of Oregon.(Parcels 1,2,3 and 4 above) GRANT OF EASEMENT Grantor hereby grants and conveys,from the date of the conveyance,an easement for a common driveway in favor of each of the Parcels of this Agreement over the other Parcels above described real estate for the benefit of the Grantor and future owners of the Parcels,the easement being described as follows: Easement for Driveway 2.. Page 1 • RECIPROCAL ACCESS EASEMENT A parcel of land in Block 29,West Portland IIeights,a duly recorded plat recorded in .-4 Book 1,Page 56,Washington County Plat Records,said parcel lying in the N.E. 1/4 of Section °`I 1,1'.25.,R.1 W.,Willamette Meridian,City of Tigard,Washington County,Oregon,more particularly described as follows: BEGINNING AT THE NORTHWEST CORNER OF SAID LOT 5 AND RUNNING THENCE, ALONG THE NORTH LINE THEREOF,EAST,24.00 FEET;THENCE,PARALLEL WITH AND 24.00 FELT EAST 01?TIIE WEST LINE OF SAID LOT 5,SOUTH 138.00 FEET;THENCE, PARALLEL WITH AND 12.00 FEET NORTH OF THE SOUTH LINE OF SAID LOT 35,EAST, 76.00 FEET TO THE EAST LINE THEREOF;THENCE,ALONG THE EAST LINE OF SAID LOTS 35 AND 34,SOUTH,24.00 FEET;THENCE,PARALLEL WITH AND 12.00 FEET SOUTH OF THE NORTH LINE OF SAID LOT 34,WEST,100.00 FEET TO THE WEST LINE THEREOF; THENCE,ALONG THE WEST LINE OF SAID LOTS 34 AND 35,NORTH,35.00 FEET; THENCE,PARALLEL WITH AND 2.00 FEET SOUTH OF THE NORTH LINE OF SAID LOT 10, WEST,100.00 FEET TO THE WEST LINE TIII3REOI;TIIENCE,ALONG THE WEST LINE OF SAID LOTS 10 AND 9,NORTH,24.00 FEET;THENCE,PARALLEL WITH AND 3.00 FEET SOUTH OF THE NORTH LINE OF SAID LOT 9,EAST, 100.00 FEET TO THE EAST LINE THEREOF;THENCE,ALONG THE EAST LINE OF SAID LOT 9 AND THE WEST LINE OF SAID LOT 5,NORTH 103.00 FEET TO THE POINT-OF—BEGINNING. Said easement contains 8,112.00 square feet more or less. Subject to easements of record. "DRIVEWAY PURPOSES"DEFINED Driveway purposes as used in this easement means that all vehicles shall use or travel across the right-of-way described above for purposes of ingress and egress of motor vehicles,pedestrians, and uses incidental to any lawful use of the property. MAINTENANCE The easement described above shall be maintained in good repair by the parties in ownership of the Parcels described in this Agreement. EASEMENT TO RUN WITH LAND This easement is superior and paramount to the rights of any of the parties hereto in their respective servient estate so created and the parties further agree that it is a covenant that shall run with the land. Easement for Driveway 3 Page 2 • r IN WITNESS WI IE1tEOF the parties have executed this Agreement the e date and year above/;'tt•'.- oc GRA . 1^4A-C2 t-e-. Qr ! . R't r. Theresa A.Roth STATE OF OREGON, ) )Bs. County of sh ) Dated this day of / 'per L , 1995 Personally appeared the within named J.T.ROTH,Jr.and acknowledges the foregoing / instrument to be his voluntary act and deed. �{ Before: ,,/ J�:� oFfro.11BEA Notary Public for Orego • ' LINDA L MC GETI1QAN My commission expires: 01-,x.$_Q 1 Ki.F warm Cf1e00N OOia118s10N NO.061 t 06 MYCOWMEN WIRES FEB.00.2001 STATE OF OREGON, ) )ss. County of UfJ, ) Dated this c9�day of rlp� , 1995 Personally appeared the within named THERESA A.ROTH and acknowled t•s e foregoing instrument to be his voluntary act and deed. dill r Before: Notary Public for Orego / ;��'s' delli My commission expires: �.-a-S-4)1 •:^.- OFFICIAL SEA `• J 001M1188ON NO.C6t1O9 MYCO COMMON PIRESFEB.2a,2001 Easement for Driveway Page 3 030U/1999 12:3& GU3653906 CUMRASS ENGINEERING PAGE 83 1 5.W. FRAKL ! t\J St ., )(RO.A. 25 25 as 25 2.*' I 25 2 25 ' >. o f 2 0 4 0 5, 6 7 8 I 1 •c4 CSI 7j (T X77,.7- 7,,7 - / i i 36 7 100 , r /,!/1 , , I 1 \/l/// .7 q. ,ate .// CV. 12 33 0...., 2.6.9 . . ..,. 0 "' ! ...., iir, . 1 30 . .... ..... ...... ..... ..... ��I i 5 ".I , H STATE OF OREGON County of Washington } SS 1 I• �./ I.Jerry B. Peal!, 4,ti`t of Assess- Cler and @in ■. o county Clerk for •-.:Wil • filly that the witht6.1Det •.11:4y p ••••COIVed and reQOrtfed•. :/�"h't • - •t said ' county.-!* '+ ?',_.��a • '�`• -- D i � rootor of t tlon,Ex- tent Doc : 96112131.1 Rect: 177271 43.00 12/18/1996 10:40:SOem ! . 1 4 1111 - I • 1 I • r •f • • • • • e. . •, .r J --! GI 4 art:iAiZ=cam DOAtt'rKttfr cm OF TICARD troawnad vi -- Ttariatisrsss . 1V0 CHANGE IN TAX STATEMENT ***THIS DOCUMENT IS BEING RE-RECORDED TO ADD A . MAP ENT*** OF TEE EASEM �o wetyy re c:a .dwzb 'j6iuz-1..+4g.1 • EASEMENT FOR UTILITY AND DRIVEWAY ►OR ACTOR VO4ICtIDRIVEWAYaNAD9MRW PAACELSCOMET-CIA/Mt Date: L. /.3 ,19 Grantors:R&W Partners 12540 SW 68th Prkwy NB Tigard,Or.97223 Jerob T.Roth.3r,and Theresa A.Roth 12540 SW 68th Prkwy NB - ' i Tigard,Or.97223 _ . • 8' i RECITALS g¢ WHEREAS,Grantor R.&W Partners is seized of an estate in fee simple a of a parcel of land described as: a d Lou 33 and 34,Block 29, West Portland Heights,City of Tigard,County of •• Washington Co..State of Oregon. WHEREAS.Gra ttor Jacob T.Roth.Jr.and Theresa A Roth is seized of i an estate in fee simple of a parcel of land described as: Lots 35 and 36. Block 29. West Portland Heights.City of Tigard,County of Washington Co..State of Oregon. — and said two parcels of real estate adjoin each other. I • r WHEREAS,the parties to this Agreement desire to create a common driveway and utility casement described below on Lots 34 and 35 for the benefit of the — i public for driveway purposes and the appropriate utilities to install,operate,maintain. replace and change,in size,any of the utilities or pipelines below ground and related — equipment upon the casement described below for the benefit of Lots 1,2,3,4.5,6,7, . 8,9.10,11,12, 13.14,15,16.33.34.;5,and 36 of Block 29,West Portland Heights, County of Washington,State of Oregon. GRANT OF EASEMENT — Grantors hereby grant and convey from the date of the conveyance an easement for a cornmor driveway in favor of each of the parties to this Agreement over . the other parties above described real estate for the benefit ot•the Grantor in favor of the Grantor in the other parties described property, together with an easement to the appropriate utilities for utility lines and pipe purposes over and across the oroperty owned . . by Grantors described above,the easement being described as follows: Easement For Utility and Driveway Pagel _____imammimmiimmii i • • jtECIPROCALACCESS EASEMENT A parcel rcel of land in Block 29.West Portland Heights,a duly recorded plat ` recorded in Book 1,Page 56,Washington County Plat Records,said parcel lying in the . N.E.1/4 of Section 1,T.2S.,R.1 W..W.M.,City of Tigard,Washington County,Oregon. I more particularly described as follows: BEGINNING at a point on the west Line of Lot 34,Block 29,West Portland Heights that is N89 •56' 33"E 100.00 feet and S00%00' 23"E 161.84 feet from the N.W.corner of Lot 1.Block 29.West Portland Heights,said beginning point lying 12.00 feet south of the north line of said Lot 34 when measured at right angles thence,12.00 feet south of and parallel with said north line N89%57' 04"E 100.02 feet to the west right of way line of S.W.68th Avenue;thence,N00%00' 41"W 24.00 feet on said right of way line to a point on the east line of Lot 35,Block 29.West Portland Heights that,when measured . at right angles,is 12.00 feet north of the north line of said Lot 34,Block 29;thence, leaving said right of way line,12.00 feet north of and parallel with said north line, S89%ST 04"W 100.02 feet to the west line of said Lot 35;thence,S00%00' WE 24.00 feet on said west line and the west line of said Lot 34 to the POINT OF BEGINNING. Said casement contains 2,400 square feet more or less. Subject to easements of record. =' "DRIVEWAY PURPOSES"DEFINED •, Driveway purposes as used in this easement means that all vehicles shall use or travel across the right-of-way described above for purposes of ingress end egress of motor vehicles,pedestrians,and uses incidental to any lawful use of the property. "UTILITY EASEMENT"DEFINED Utility easement is defined as an casement to install,operate,maintain, replace and change in size of any utilities or pipelines below ground and related equipment • upon the described easement property. ' MAINTENANCE `_ The easement described above shall be maintained in good repair by the parties to this Agreement. mm!--. • EASEMENT TO RUN WITH LAND This easement is superior and paramount to the rights of any of the parties =, hereto in the respective se:vicnt estate so created and the parties further agree that it is a covenant that shall run with the land. —. Easement For Utility and Driveway Paget ,3 3 . • IN WITNESS WHEREOF the parties have executed this Agreement the A date and year above written. 1 GRANTOR: By:. . .. .li t • . .. W. ,..•,. -RA. •artners ?`\l") f.•b T.Roth. . Theresa A.Roth STATE OF OREGON, ) )es. . _ County of ) Dated L 11—day of�r.149�� r Personally appeared the within -••.,• ci 'A I ' .• P; • )and -- aekrowledges the foregoing• at • •• o �J ;lift Before: 4 erasurdri ri I_• diary Public f•irreg.• 'm My commission c pires:�- -Cj 7 I1 R 1;�•. oFFIGALsr_AL STATE OF OREGON. ) LINO ALMOO[TT1GAN �� • NOTARY PUBLIC-OREGON SS. COMMISSION NO.0240 County of • ) MY COMMISSION EXPIRES FE8.28,19➢7 Ili Dated this t day of l. T.l99 • Personally appeared the within named.1- 'OB T •a TH,JR.and a wledgcs the • • foregoing instrument to be his v. • : • :c i dec' M ■ Before:: `I.(. l \) 4!tary Public or Or g� , My commission expues:� • �'�• CFFlC1�15Fw1 STATE OF OREGON. ) ,7' .. uuoALMCosEALaw `>\` NorowPUeucoacooN • ' )ss` •• CouuasONNO.021847 • County of ) r_MYCOUMISS,ON EXPIRES FEB.2r,ty87 . Dat 4 this 1.5 042yofV{NL1uCV ,149 EN JPersonally appeared the within •• d THERESA asa'OTH and ackno ledges the ' foregoing instrument to be his o ••• ••=1111 -' vb.. ` Before: .1 ./Ff r ' r~ otnry Public 7 Oregoi � My commission expires".‘147 — !;1`• OFFICIAL SEAL Pa e3 • Easement For Utility and Driveway \\••• LINDA L MC o[rt.OM/ Page3 ~••'/ "CM�Sa1t+D@s47 MT COMMISSIONtoMSE8.21,1127 I ihal eft d I 1 I I - of C1)fdr,�jss� CERTtMEJ TO LEA TRUE AND �4v�'= �';,, CORRECT COPY OF THE ORIGINAL r, ^ r 11;;;'i R H!;7$O?,DIRECTOR ; •yy , • • p:,rart.`o,t of 4::::anent & Taxation . , . - ._ _ ____ - • .._ _ _. .. _ _ _ _ r 3/4" IP \..)' . • • , . . • 1 �: 0 = ) ,1 S.W. FRANKLIN STREET . (:_' l/.... o an 0 d 1 r 260.00 (250.00'('•)) .__. • o N 89'56'33. E (780.00'(1)) _b 71 0. ) z - 200.01' _(200.00'(1)) pl• J.- ---- - 100,00' (100.00'(1)) .-( }- 100.01' (1oo.o0'(l)) f N 59'35 • • ip • I.-. I ADJUSTED I I I _ \ 30.0 co •+RNER LINE I ^ I BLOCK 29 1 o • ORTLAND o° l TRACT 1 I '0"; I TRACT 2 I o %• I v AREA9989 S.F. oa AREA-14,986 S.F. O I I I 1 o $ 10 FEE NO. 84-45985 ca 1 p 03 I I C) in FEE N0. 94-107783 . Q� I rn ` I I i Ch 1 � 2 3 I 4 - 5 6 7 g co 00.01' (loo.00'(1)) ' N A __ 1. _ 1 l' 12 N 89'56'54." E _- o ( CI;30' 30 9 y� o XI 36 vcc r • 0. FEE NO. 90-23217 0 Z r c -I, 8 •• a I0 10 1.4 • - • „ 100.•0' 1 `��� of c r P 9977/0,4 E 1 0.0 8 • N a 11 fJ •° , �. fE o yR `'. 12 33 r Z FEE NO. 90-01500 E .— __.• ..----- —.._____.__. . — P m _ NA O 6 FEE NO. 89-13519 (/) 4, d (� — IN q a m W I kw CD _.. h OG) D • j 6 iiimmimmimingsmir______ - i -= :=:=E- .7-..flE : - '_E 703S2402 7q 1-.. 0S-1O 09:S7 #016 P.03/09 y0,- Y� / . • • h'_!• A M I X i e1 + 3� . STATUTORY WARRANTY DEED fte -: S. T. '+fi - '. • .._• -. ea, ea,trwrr. /4,11:1! • o.- ,! Gnamr, . g4-13 waveps and warrants m ^' '4• +�■ P t'ti` Gran:x, the following described roan proeetty free dilate and eacambnices,except as specifically let forth herein: . SEE EXHIBIT "A" ATTA IED EEREIC: r • I This property is frec of Ileua and encumbrances,EXCEPT: 1998/99 TAXES A LIEN NOT YET PAYABr•E; . CITY LIENS; SEE MIST": "B" ?ITPA= HERETO: • • 2 ti r - THIS INSTRUMENT WILL NOT ALLOW USE OF TITS PROPERTY DESCRIBED IN THIS INSTRUMENT LEI . VIOLATION OF APPLICABLE LAND USE LAWS AND REGULATIONS.BEFORE SIGNING OR ACCEPTING THIS INSTRUMENT, THE FERIIaN ACQUIRING FEB TITLE TO THE PROPERTY SHOULD CHECK WITH THE APPROPRIATE CITY OR COUNTY PLANNING DEPARTMENT TO VERIFY APPROVED USES AND TO DETERMINE ANY LIMITS ON LAWSUITS AGAINST FARMING CR FOREST PRACTICES AS DEFINED IN CRS 30.930. • • The true eanaiderati171s for this conYeysnoC is S 250,OO (14 (Mere amply wide therwalnreend al CM 93.0301 • Dated ms, 177.1day of Y IS�8 �^10 fit AV,.AV . 1..1 -r 4 1 WP' 0,, -. • • R & A PARD:ERS J. T. =CH CCV.STRUC ICII. INC. B ;;%,L:�+r! J/R,.�plErs-t ENT • �/:. t..c/ �' 1-VT' L. r . - noHERm A. T IE STd?T4FDRLCON *,J, T. ROTH C " fII=IN, I: C., E721 AS FAQ �+ WASHINGTON � OF R b W PAR[NEFS an gigs t�2day f "`0us'r 14 qtr ,before ale appraredKFN ETIt L. WAVIIRE AS • e I a v*x J,--x, iOTH ,. L both to me Pcrsotfaity known,who being duty swam,did say that he,the sat . ",Ti L tIAYt(IIL°. A9_E.EESIIaNT...47-12110- *Y T JR AS P F"Y17Is1YT Oi Fr the_EA fir,and he, 9aid.�- is the_PAIrTaR Xlisifi9r9 Of.. R & W FARM:F A^ the within named Corporation, and that the seal ojflred to said instrument is the corporate seat of said Corporation, and •• that the said ilssIrument was sighed and seaird tn�hajf of said Corporation by authority of irs of Di rs, a :: 10E12"� n t r. said instrument to be the free act and deed of said Corporation s the day and ye• Jost above IN TES7IMONY 'PP.Y aP +a Set y Id { •..•••• a written. **MIS r t /1,I/;��• / • ' - ' -.• uKOa L>vic pET�6aN ft iLit4A.•t►f • t Public for Grego:. `r.' Iq 081100 My °medal-on eayir - ' - �,, =►Ita.arsoot y• Title Order No. e tAQ 1 THIS SPACE RESERVED FOR RECORDER'S USE Escrow Na. 980}451 Aker i.c I011a return to: .1_4:1011. rta>;nIMOT011 Miler*, 1%, , R4TII. JH : FROM :FIRST RMEPICAIN TITi_E 3 5036240239 18 7S-1L 09:S6 #016 P.02/08 + III. IT 28 - 17 28 - - - 28 -I ' • 8 18 -1 27 18 + 27 IS 27 • 'M.T T -T` T T T 7 — t 1 1 1 r , T I 1 T T T -'I 430,E 1 4/7 Aa 00 &I 19 20 2! 22 23 24 25 26 19 201 21 22 23 24 25 2O 19 20121 22 23 24 25 26 1 P 1 O R 1- I rA 1' + V 1 i I 1 I , 1 t Z I 1 I 1 I i : I 1 t 1 I 1 _--, r vap►TEO SW FRANKLIN•0 99-95 213 M T T T' ig 1 T T T ,- t i9 2.9 rr -to IZ1 ■}5 r/^ —r -r _17900i 1 I T 1 r 1 9 l64 I I 8302 4 1° .23 A -0 B I l 2 3 4115 6 7 8 . 1 2 3 4 6 7 8 11 2 3 4 5 6 1 7 S l 0 1 II 1 0 ,arl 1 1 i 1+ J. 1 1 - 1- i A,. 1 1 ^ 1 I+I t 1 1 ` -� I 1 9 36 C l=1 36 _ 117700 _ 7800 1+ 71747-35- ' :.d4 AC. .75 AC. -4 0 8 10 - 35 - --a -.I1 y.-14. 8 I1 34 C 8300 -B5'0D 14 66 ` II 11 34 �n 12 t 33 ./22 ,--135.0e_ .IrAC `� 12 33 . M ~ -W- t 4. 32 -� eQA& ei "I 13 Z 8 32 s • •S.W. 0 st- .Z1ta ---- ■ - 7600 - 31 A VE AND 0 : aeon IP I 3a .JS.c 30 TA ET, i A /SAG I 29 15 29 TE ~ '' ."'_� 17 28 9600 + .45� 9800 1 "9766— l8 27 -4 ° ~ Ils'r T T T + Y T T- - 4/AC 1 *IAC. 1 , 1 A, 1 19 20 21 221 23 24 2'5 26 19 20 21 ?2 23 24 25 25 � �i 2,L w' w` i11 i!' 2d 2i' is' S9' 21' 9 1' 1 .!/'-Z-.*`1y0,.-ts`_i_9 Lte_i_td_i_ts;} 80 �p TO I..,., ••17 (S.W. GONZAOA ST.) t7-$0WM .` vA-1TIta 1}-IOIH1 — - - SEE MAP- 1 25 I IAD • 1 FROM :FIRST AMER ICRN TITLE 2 E039240279 0S-1'J 09:E7 #016 P.04/09 • �+.t...-.---- a=:R�..tip-` _. .+... ..,^+--.. 6 _ _ . - +,:,T:- - tir: �'-:..:._ -' .• 'K" .': 'yam`"----•rt-' r1. rN rid•.. - ,' :4: .,. `E , 1 ' • • ,• EXHIBIT A' — PARCFt I• I Parcel 2,PARTITION PLAT NO.1496-024,In the City ofT4;ard,County of Washington and State of Oregon. ITOGETHER WITH easements for inQraaa and ogres;as deucrib.d In Documents recorded September 28, ; • 1895 es Fsr'j+a 85088649 and September 28, 1995 u Fee No.95089E53 and easement far driveway purpoau desE Ibed In Document recorded January 17,1997 as ha No.97905545. PARCEL III Lots 16 and 15.Nook 29,WEST PORTLAND}{EIGHTS,In the C ty of TIgard, County of WaahLkair-,n and State d Oregon. . .' PARCEL III: ..' Lets 1,2,3,4,g, 10, 11 and 12, BlrkK 29,WEST PORTLAND HEIGHTS,In the Cty or Tigard,County of • Washington end etata of Oregon. '1 - PARCEL IV: • • Lot 13-14,Inotusive,Bieck 29,WEST PORTLAND HEIGHTS,In the City of'Nerd,County of Washington and . Stets of Oregon. PARCEL V; • Lot 33-34,Inctustve,EIock 29,WEST PCRTLANID HEIGHTS,in the City of Tigard,County of WsshIngton and • State of Oregon. } . • • • VI - 3 . .. ' . . . ... .. ,... •'+• •'r•-• .:a +r, a •r _ Sy.4rr, ,.'"•rM^ti y+•.w,tF:S t t , .,.�eio..re•-•p5•r•+'••,- " ' '� s'. tia. rerir'i%V t+° I.. -+r 1..10'1 i—•.- .'I i - •1.., sr!1..'rb.• {:Y �� '1 ti • ... r .., .. X .Try:. .1"�. FROM :FIPET AMERICAN TITLE 0 50362• 0239 15 3S-1 OS:S8 14016 P.0S:OS .:. , _= -.!.' ,+,40.:tom:r te.. ``1."?.n,T-.:T j F -i!,.';..."1,0.,..... i:.}•+-, ..-r:a.;'7.rtrtrkrr�.s.r sS••1. .j . 4 8 „B,1 1, Tam for the fiscal year 1888-99 a lien not yet payable. • • 2, City Lien In favor of the City of Tigard. For : Loral improvement Distrid • Account No. : 81530 Lien/Docket Book : US 9910750 • Dated . June 3,1958 • Origin!Amount : $16,847.30 Balance Owing : 6 1,413.80,plus Interest,d any, • (Affects Parcel I) ' • • 3. Stetrttay Powers and 11pse,w.rwnts of Unified Sweatier,Manny. 4. These pram:sea are wtthln the boundaries of the Tualatin Valley Water Diattlel arid are eubied to the , twins and assessments thereat e. 5. An easement oreelau uy'instrument,including the taoro end provision■thereof; • Recorded : July 9,1571 in Back 1325,page 744 Favor of : Donald E.Pollock and Julia Gall Pollack • r For : A drain fIeld • Affects : Pseud location not disclosed on document • • . • (Atfeck Parcel V) 1 ` • • • 8. 13e?,cordebe Notice of Covenant,ln:ludlnd the terms and provisions thereof, Dated : Jahn 8, 1978 Recorded : July 22,1675 In Book 1099,Pape 775 • • • Between : Dela C.Trump and CV of Tlgard,Oregon • (Affords Parcel V) • 7. RosarvatI wi of utilities is vacated street area and the right to maintain the game as set form In Ordinance . No,80.31 a copy of which was Recorded : September 30,198E as Fee Na.88044443 • • • The effect of ra-recording of the above document • Accorded Febrtl¢ry 7,1096 as Fee No.86010840 . .. SaId document purport,to release the casement reserred In the above Ordinance, • (Affects Parcel I) • • • 0. Agreement For Easement;In�Uding the teal'end provisions thereof, • Dated : September 20,1955 • Recorded : September 26,1965 a:l=ea hlo.95099649 Between : Elizabeth G,Pollock and Donald B.Pollock For : Access . ' Affects : The East 12 feet of Parcel I •. e... 9. An easement created by inetnrmant,!naiad:ft;the terms,and provlelan:tharuo; -., • Recorded : Septernhar,28,1436 as Fee Na 9,069650 Executed by . Roper M.Pollock •- • • For ; Accar, . :, Affects : The East 12 feet of Parcel II • 10. 1creament ter Easement,Inciudlnp the tams and pravlelone thereof, Dated : September 2C,1999 • Recorded : September 28,1865 as Fee No.95069651 • Between : Donald E.Foll=k and Elizabeth G.Pollock . ' Affects : The Flat 12 feet of Parcel 1 • • 11. An easement created by Instrument,Intd.:ding tha terms and provfaions thereof; Recorded : September 28.1965 as Fee No.05288652 ..'. • Favor of : Roper M.Pollock • For : Atxees • . Affects : The East 12 feet of Lola 13 and 14 of Parcel IV _ • FROM :FIRST AMERICAN TITLE = 5036240239 0S-10 __ #01E P.OE/08 ' PFw^E Z — EtILIBIT "B° • E . 12.Trust Dead,Including the tetms end provisions thereof,given to secure an indebtedness of$104,000.00 Dated : January 2,1986 ,f? Recorded : January 5,1998 as Fes No.8600132/ Grantor : R a W Femmes il - Trustee t Era American Title!neurones Co. • Bensfietory ' Donetd E.Pollock • (Affects Parcels III,IV b V) 13, Trust Deed,including he terms and provisions thoraof,given to secure rn indebtedness of$52,000,00 . Dated , January 2,1926 Recorded : January 5,18%as Fae No.96001322 • Granter : R&W Partners .. . Trustee : First American The Irwurahoe Co. Beneficiary : Richard L-Carpenter (Atfecrtri Parts)III) 1 . 14. Trust Deed,including the terms and provisions thereof,given to secure an Inaebtedriess of 320,00040 Dated : January 2,1996 Recorded : January 6,1998 ea Fatr No.96001323 Grantor : R&W Partners Trustee : First American Title Insurance Co. • Beneficiary t RIchard L Carpenter • s (Affects Parcel.II ar.d orivswey easement) 15. RestricUons shown on the recorded plat/partition as follows; 'This plat subject to the Conditions of City f of Tkrsrd Plann{ng File MLP 05-0013: (Affects Parcel I) 16. An casement created by Instrument,Including the terms and prnvthions thereof; nod : November 15,1890 as'Fes No.96-10:498 -- Re-recorded : December 18,1955 as Fee No.98-112131 Favor of : Lots 1-16,Inclushre end 33.38.Inclusive,13look 8 For : Utility yid driveway Affects . Parcel V 17. Makitenane;s provisions as set out n Document ••. • Recorded : .:anuary 17, 1987 es Fee No.87005545 • For : Drveway (Affects Parcels I and II) 18. An easement created by instrument,including the terms and?revisions thereof-, _ Ruootded ; .January 17,1227 a5 Foe No.37005545 Favor of , J.T.Roth,Jr.and'Theresa A.Roth . For . Driveway Affects : PercelII 19. Trust Deed.Including the tomes and provisions thereof,given:o secure an Indebtedn as of 3Jt9-nt cleft uo to 3575,000.00 Dated : Jemmy 9,1997 ,.• Recorded : February 4, 1657 as Fee No,97010527 • Grantor : .LT.Roth.Jr..Theresa Roth,Kannoth L Wayrr:ro and Roberta A Waymire Trustee ; Flat American Title Ittsuranco Company . Beneficiary : The Merchants Bank _ •... - Lean No. : 11531 1 •' . (Affects Parcel!1&II)' • 20. An assignment of all rents,royalties,Issues and profits accruing from said:and,u additional security • for the payment of indebtedness secured by the above Trust Deed Recorded : February 4, 1997 as Fee No.87010528 .• • Executed by : J.T.Roth,Jr.,Theresa Roth,Kenneth L.Waymire end Roberta A,Waymire • To ; The Merchants tank •.- (Affects Parcels 18,II) 21. Agreement for Future Release of Property,including the tarns and prGvtttons thereof, s, . Dated : January 31,1897 Recorded : February 4,1997 an Fee No.97010529 Between ; J.T.Roth Jr.,Theresa Roth.Kenneth L.WaytvJre end Roberta A Waymire (Affects Parcels I b,II) • • . . • f I '- .. .. ter' -! .. .*• t' = - _ 5036240239 1,. 0S-10 0S:59 it 01E P.07/08 STATE OF OREGON c:owuy of WASHINGTON }dd. i 8Y a MUE.ACIERED.That vn tills —13--day of _ wispy■« _19 9 B heart mr.the wudenignad,a Notary Public in and for afd County and State,perronally appeared the within mined- :•- . . . .b*: .J:'Q•. '1Y. (.J. . 1 . 4.1.- • •A bowls is au to be the identical individual a...describd la and who •• ad the within inarntnwr and acknowledged to ,;,� IRO than }p1. �/tN WHEREOF, satAePettyyand w atfly. ��j )w,' M .&V TEST lRON HEREOF, I have hereunto eet •1 11 .. ) , dal 1 • Z4 there ' I On ._.,, irAti ititliAtatiG . : C onstie>:rpires ± : - LINDA .M GETTIWW , ::J artPLS.O•paeoai Ceases:I(no.0811 Oa . • tIYourrf«outaw • . ) i • . 1 • • .. 1 • • • • • • FROM =FIRST AMERICAN TITLE _ SO36240239 1_ DS-10 O9159 #015 P.OB/O8 II • ' .�1'yam,• _ '� •--',.,,""�_ti_,_�._ A. ,.' � 1�...(.....' ; A � • 1' . 1. • J • .. ; • '•• STATE OF 011E2OPI 1 f 46 County otW+�hlnGtne Jerry• .. -r o!Anson. mint ane ,,n 1 • .o Cautery - CWkfar .;∎7tt3�,': .scats•the • ter, • a4.�`;-4;414; of saidd rtIfy 4D ��' Vic' 4 ,' ,• .War of ■ erk Doe 1 98006175 Rect: 313971 546.00 • 08/31/1998 03:47;14pm , 1 • • • • • • • • • • • • • /....4, • • .�•' S1s ,,..;,r i_ ti +...-. .w J.w. ri.,. . y.r. r.... $„.-.•-•..,•.•.• ew. V";g � 7 i w. rr •X y = ', :•—?, . . .r t 1...!.,E 4.■r . .` ti N "t1 ."...41,1:1:::4)• t'MNV ;•�;•^� � . .- f .w.::'rte'• -j• �.7w. �Y YC►�4tO r.•�}M • 'ti.. r"?...' •,.S '-:$, n � .R ,- . + . ^• •:p .. bcsw ?tI "'t' " slr�'rr1CK r, r e + .�.• V r. t j rtn•l.r.re '-Y i -!,1^ I COMMERCIAL ASSOCIATION OF REALTORS® OREGON/SOUTHWEST WASHINGTON 2 PURCHASE AND SALE AGREEMENT AND RECEIPT FOR EARNEST MONEY 3 (Oregon-Commercial Form) v 4 Dated: 4 / '"CG • 5 BETWEEN: City of Tigard ("Seller'") 1 6 -AND: J.T. Roth, Jr. and Theresa A. Roth ("Buyer") 7 Buyer agrees to buy and Seller agrees to sell. on the following terms. the real property and all 8 improvements thereon (the "Property") commonly known as 17575 SW 68th Ave" Tigard" 1)r, alco known 9 as tax lot 2S1 W SectionAA. Tax Lot 8600 and located at IO — in the City of I I Tigard . County of Washington . Oregon legaily described as 12 follows: All of Lot 32 and a part of Lot 31. Block 79 West Portland Heights - 13 • 14 15 If no legal description is inserted or attached. Buyer and 16 Seller will attach a legal description upon receipt and reasonable approval by both parties of the Preliminary_ 17 Commitment or. if applicable. the Survey. IS 19 I. Purchase Price. The total purchase price is Forty Two Thousand Nine Hundred Ninety Nine 20 and no/100 dollars (S 42.922.00 ) payable as follows: 21 cash on close ,'1 1_3 2. Earnest Money Receipt. Upon execution of this Agreement. Buyer shall pay 24 S 1 n X100 00 as earnest money (the "Earnest Money") in the form of kx cash or 25 'J check or ❑ promissory note. If the Earnest Money is in the form of a promissory note.it is due and payable: 26 ❑ upon execution of this Agreement by Buyer and Seller or ❑ no later than 5 PM Pacific Time one day after 27 satisfaction or waiver by Buyer of the conditions to Buyer's obligation to purchase the Property set forth in this 28 Agreement or ❑ other: . If 29 the Earnest Money promissory note is not redeemed and paid in full when due, then (i) the Earnest Money promissory 30 note shall be delivered and endorsed to Seller(if not already in Seller's possession). (ii) Seller may collect the Earnest 31 Money from Buyer. either pursuant to an action on the promissory note or an action on this Agreement. and (iii) this 32 Agreement shall be of no further force or effect. The Earnest Money shall he deposited 33 with - ...- • _ • - • _ (the "Title Company") at the following branch: 34 Lincoln Tower or ❑ other: 35 The Earnest 36 Money shall be applied to the payment of the purchase price for the Property at closing. Any interest earned on the 37 Earnest Money shall be considered to be part of the Earnest Money. The Earnest Money shall he returned to Buyer 38 in the event any condition to Buyer's obligation to purchase the Property shall fail to be satisfied or waived through 39 no fault of Buyer. 40 3. Conditions to Purchase. Buyer's obligation to purchase the Property is conditioned on the following: 41 ❑ none and/or x Addendum "A" attached herete and made s part heneef as if the same were setforth 42 in whole i . CZ , ii,. ...4... Ai _ ,°. ._ , _ • , - ice.. ! `4 i ..#______ 44 and/or❑I Buyer's approval of the results of its property inspection described in Section 4 below. If Buyer tt��ti • ✓ .� I s? 1997 Commercial Association of REALTORS® Oregon/Southwest Washington (Rev. 11/97) PURCHASE AND SALE AGREEMENT AND RECEIPT FOR EARNEST MONEY (OREGON) 1 I has not given written waiver of these conditions, or stated in writing that these conditions have been satisfied, by written notice liven to Seller within days after the Execution Date (defined below). the Agreement shall 3 be terminated. and the Earnest Money shall be promptly returned to Buyer. 4 4. Property Inspection. Seller shall permit Buyer and its agents. at Buyer's sole expense and risk. 5 to enter the Property, at reasonable times after reasonable prior notice to Seller and after prior notice to the tenants 6 of the Property as required by the tenants' leases. to conduct inspections. tests. and surveys concerning the structural 7 condition of the improvements. all mechanical. electrical and plumbing systems. hazardous materials. pest S infestation. soils conditions. wetlands. American with Disabilities Act compliance. and other matters affecting the 9 _suitability of the Property for Buyer's intended use and/or otherwise reasonable related to the purchase of the 10 Property. Buyer shall indemnify, hold harmless. and defend Seller from all liens costs. and expenses. including I I reasonable attorneys' fees and experts' fees, arising from or relating to Buyer's entr :m and inspection of the i2 Property. This agreement to indemnify. hold harmless. and defend Seller shall survive closing or am termination 13 of this Agreement. i 4 Seller's Documents. Within !o days after the Execution Date. Seller shall del s er to IS Buyer. at Buyer's address shown below, legible and complete copies of the following documents and other items i 6 relating to the ownership. operation. and maintenance of the Property. to the extent now in existence and to the extent - such items are within Seller's possession or control: latast s'trvey of property in Seller's — :� possescinn 19 6. Title Insurance. Within 10 days after the Execution; Date. Seller shall deliver to 2(} Buyer nrelimina ■ title tenon from the Title Company the "Preliminary Commitrnem") together with complete and legible copies of all documents shown therein as exceptions to title. showing the status of Seller's title to the -_ Property. Buyer shall have 30 days after receipt of a copy at the Preliminar:. L.tmmitment within which to give notice in writing to Seller or any objection to such title or to an• liens or encumbrances affecting the Proper■ 22' Within 30 days after the date of such notice from Buyer. Seller shall give Buyer written notice of whether it is willing and able to remove the objected-to exceptions. Within 10 flays after the date of such notic; 26 from Seller. Buyer shall elect whether to purchase the Property subject to the objected-to exceptions which Seiie:- ?7 is not willing or able to remove or terminate this Agreement. On or before the Closing Date (defined below), Seller 28 shall remove all exceptions to which Buyer objects and which Seller agrees Seller is willing and able to remove. 29 All remaining exceptions set forth in the Preliminary Commitment and agreed to by Buyer shall be "Permitted 30 Exceptions." The title insurance policy to be delivered by Seller to Buyer at closing shall contain no exceptions 31 other than the Permitted Exceptions and the usual preprinted exceptions in an owner's standard form title insurance 32 nolic,.. 3 Default: Remedies. It the conditions, if any. to Buyer's obligation to close this transaction are 34 satisfied or waived by Buyer and Buyer nevertheless fails. through no fault of Seller. to close the purchase or the 35 Property. Seller's sole remedy shall he to retain. the Earnest Money paid by Buyer. In the event Seller fails. through 36 no fault of Buyer. to close the sale of the Property. Buyer shall be entitled to pursue any remedies available at law or in equity. including without limitation. the remedy of specific performance. 38 S. Closing of Sale. The sale shall be closed on or before 2a0 days from 39 date of mutual acceptance- ❑ days after the Execution Date (the "Closing Date") in escrow at 40 the Title Company. The sale shall be "closed" when the document conveying title is recorded and funds are 41 disbursed to Seller. At closing. Buyer and Seller shall deposit with the Title Company all documents and funds 42 required to close the transaction in accordance with the terms of this Agreement. Ai closing. Seller shall deliver 4 a certification in a form approved by Buyer that Seller is not a "foreign person" as such, term is defined in the 44 Internal Revenue Code and the Treasury Regulations promulgated under the Internal Revenue Code. If Seller is a 4i foreign person and this transaction is not otherwise exempt from FIRPTA regulations. the Title Company shall be 46 instructed by the parties to withhold and pay the amount required by law regulations. the Internal Revenue Service. At 47 closing. Seller shall convey fee simple title to the Property to Buyer by ❑ statutory warranty deed or 48 og Bargain and cale deed (the "Deed"). If this Agreement provides for the conveyance by 49 Seller of a vendee•s interest in the Property by a contract of sale. Seller shall deposit with the Title Company (or L 1997 Commercial Association of REALTORS® Oregon/Southwest Washington (Rev. 11/97) PURCHASE AND SALE AGREEMENT AND RECEIPT FOR EARNEST MONEY (OREGON) 2 I other mutually acceptable escrow) the executed and acknowledged Deed, together with written instructions to deliver 2 such deed to Buyer upon payment in full of he purchase price. At closing. Seller shall pay for and deliver to Buyer 3 a standard form owner's policy of title insurance in the amount of the purchase price insuring fee simple title to the 4 Property in Buyer subject only to the Permitted Exceptions and the standard preprinted exceptions in a standard form 5 policy. 6 9. Closing Costs: Prorates. Seller shall pay the premium for the title insurance policy which Seller is 7 required to deliver pursuant to the-above paragraph. Seller and Buyer shall each pay one-half of the escrow fees 8 charged by the Title Company, any excise tax, and any transfer tax. Real property taxes for the tax year in which ` 9 the transaction is closed. assessments (if a Permitted Exception), personal property taxes. rents on existing tenancies 10 -paid for the month of closing, interest on assumed obligations, and utilities shall be prorated as of the Closing Date. I I Prepaid rents. security deposits. and other unearned refundable deposits regarding the tenancies shall be assigned and I2 delivered to Buyer at closing. The Property ❑ does ❑ does not qualify for a special tax assessment or deferral 13 program as follows: 14 15 16 17 (Seller ❑ Buyer ❑ N/A shall be responsible for payment of all taxes. interest. and penalties. if any. upon -18 removal of the Property from such special assessment or program. 19 10. Possession. Buyer shall be entitled to exclusive possession of the Property. subject to tenancies 20 existing as of the Closing Date. © on the Closing Date or ❑ 21 '_2 11. Condition of Property. Seller represents that. to the hest of Seller's knowledge. there are no 23 pending or threatened notices of violation of any laws, codes. rules. or regulations applicable to the Property 24 ("Laws"). and Seller is not aware of any such violations or any concealed material defects in the Property. Risk 25 of loss or damage to the Property shall he Seller's until closing and Buyer's at and after closing. No agent of Seller 26 nor any agent of Buyer has made any representations regarding the Property. The real estate licensees named in 27 this Agreement have made no representations to any party regarding the condition of the Property. the operations 28 on or income from the Property, or whether the Property or the use thereof complies with Laws. Except for Seller's 29 representations set forth in this Section 11. Buyer shall acquire the Property "AS IS" with all faults and Buyer 30 shall rely on the results of its own inspection and investigation in Buyer's acquisition of the Property. It shall he 31 a condition of Buyer's obligation to close. and of Seller's right to retain the Earnest Money as of closing, that all 32 of the Seller's representations and warranties stated in this Agreement are materially true and correct on the Closing 33 Date. Seller's representations and warranties stated in this Agreement shall survive closing. 34 12. Personal Property. This sale includes the following personal property: xxl none 35 or ❑the personal property located on and used in 36 connection with the Property and ov+ned by Seller which Seller shall itemize in a schedule. Seller shall deliver to 37 Buyer such schedule within days after the Execution Date. 38 13. Agency Disclosure. The following agency relationship(s) in this transaction is tare) hereby 39 consented to and acknowleged: 40 (a) ❑ NA (selling real estate licensee) is the agent of (check 41 one): ❑ Buyer exclusively as an agent of Buyer: ❑ Seller exclusively as an agent of Seller: ❑ both Seller and 42 Buyer as set out in the in-company agreement. 43 (b) ❑ NA (listing agent if not the same as selling agent) is the 44 agent of (check one): ❑ Seller exclusively as Seller's agent:❑both Seller and Buyer as set out in the in-company 45 agreement. 46 (c) ❑ NA (real estate licensee) both Seller and Buyer in a 47 limited dual agency relationship pursuant to separate agreement. © 1997 Commercial Association of REALTORS® Oregon/Southwest Washington (Rev. 11/97) PURCHASE AND SALE AGREEMENT AND RECEIPT FOR EARNEST MONEY (OREGON) 3 I ACKNOWLEDGED Buyer: Dated: 3 Buyer: Dated: _ Designated 4 Seller: Dated: Broker(s) 5 Seller: Dated: Initials 6 14. Notices. Unless otherwise specified. any notice required or permitted in. or related to. this 7 Agreement must he in writing and signed by the party to he bound. Any notice or payment will be deemed given 8 when personally delivered or delivered by facsimile transmission (with electronic confirmation of delivery), or will 9 - he deemed given on the day following delivery of the notice by reputable overnight courier or through mailing in 10 the U.S. mails. postage prepaid, by the applicable parry to the address of the other party shown in this Agreement. 11 unless that day is a Saturday. Sunday. or legal holiday. in which event it will be deemed delivered on the next 12 following business day. If the deadline under this Agreement for delivery of a notice or payment is a Saturday. 13 Sunday. or legal holiday. such last day will be deemed extended to the next following business day. 14 15. Assignment. Buyer t-may assign a may not assign E may assign. if the assignee is an entity 15 owned and controlled by Buyer (may not assign. if no box is checked) this Agreement or Buyer's rights under this _ 16 Agreement without Seller's prior written consent. If Seller's consent is required for assignment. such consent may be 17 withheld in Seller's sole discretion. 18 16. Attorne':s' Fees. In the event a suit. action. arbitration. or other proceeding of any nature 19 whatsoever. including without limitation any proceeding under the U.S. Bankruptcy Code. is instituted. or the 20 services of an attorney are retained. to interpret or enforce any provision of this Agreement or with respect to any 1 dispute relating to this Agreement. the prevailing party shall he entitled to recover from the losing party its attorneys'. ?_' paralegals'. accountants'. and other experts' fees and all other fees. costs. and expenses actually incurred and 23 reasonably necessary in connection therewith. In the event of suit, action. arbitration, or other proceeding. the amount 24 thereof shall he determined by the judge or arbitrator. shall include fees and expenses incurred on any appeal or 15 review. and shall be in addition to all other amounts provided bs law. 26 17. Statutory Land Use Disclaimer. THE PROPERTY DESCRIBED IN THIS INSTRUMENT 7 MAY NOT BE WITHIN A FIRE PROTECTION DISTRICT PROTECTING STRUCTURES. THE PROPERTY 28 IS SUBJECT TO LAND USE LAWS AND REGULATIONS. WHICH. IN FARM AND FOREST ZONES. MAY 29 NOT AUTHORIZE CONSTRUCTION OR SITING OF A RESIDENCE AND WHICH LIMIT LAWSUITS 30 AGAINST FARMING OR FOREST PRACTICES AS DEFINED IN ORS 30.930 IN ALL ZONES. BEFORE 31 SIGNING OR ACCEPTING THIS INSTRUMENT. THE PERSON ACQUIRING FEE TITLE TO THE 32 PROPERTY SHOULD CHECK WITH THE APPROPRIATE CITY OR COUNTY PLANNING DEPARTMENT 33 TO VERIFY APPROVED USES AND THE EXISTENCE OF FIRE PROTECTION FOR STRUCTURES. 34 18. Miscellaneous. Time is o. the essence of this Agreement. The facsimile transmission of any 35 signed document including this Agreement shall be the same as delivery of an original. At the request of either 36 party. the parts' delivering a document by facsimile will confirm facsimile transmission by signing and delivering 37 a duplicate original document. This Agreement may be executed in two or more counterparts. each of which shall 38 constitute an original and all of which together shall constitute one and the same Agreement. This Agreement 39 contains the entire agreement and understanding of the parties with respect to the subject matter of this Agreement 40 and supersedes all prior and contemporaneous agreements between them with respect thereto. Without limiting the 41 provisions of Section 15 of this Agreement, this Agreement shall be binding upon and shall inure to the benefit 43 of the parties and their respective successors and assigns. The person signing this Agreement on behalf of Buyer 43 and the person signing this Agreement on behalf of Seller each represents, covenants and warrants that such person 44 has full right and authority to enter into this Agreement and to bind the party for whom such person signs this 45 Agreement to the terms and provisions of this Agreement. This Agreement shall not be recorded unless the parties 46 otherwise agree. © 1997-Commercial Association of REALTORS® Oregon/Southwest Washington (Rev. 11/97) PURCHASE AND SALE AGREEMENT AND RECEIPT FOR EARNEST MONEY (OREGON) 4 J I 19. Addendums: Exhibits. The following named addendums and exhibits are attached to this Agreement and incorporated within this Agreement: ❑ none or 3 ❑ Exhibit "A" attached hereto_ and inrnrparateri herein by reference 4 30. Time for Acceptance. Seller has until 5:00 p.m. Pacific Time on i to accept this offer. Acceptance is not effective until a copy 6 of this Agreement which has been signed and dated by Seller is actually received by Buyer. If this offer is not so 7 accepted. it shall expire and the Earnest Money shall be promptly refunded to Buyer. 8 11. Seller's Acceptance and Brokerage Agreement. Seller agrees to sell the Property on the terms 9 and conditions in this Agreement and further agrees to pay a commission in the total amount computed in accordance 10 with the listing agreement or other commission agreement. If there is no written listing agreement or other I I commission agreement. Seller hereby agrees to pay a commission of ❑ NA .percent ( %) of the 12 purchase price or ❑ S NA . The commission is earned as of the date this Agreement is signed 13 by Seller and Buyer. Unless otherwise provided in a separate written agreement. the real estate commission is due 14 on the Closing Date or upon Seller's breach of this Agreement, whichever occurs first. If the Earnest Money is 15 forfeited and retained by Seller in accordance with this Agreement. in addition to any other rights the listing agent 16 niay have. the listing agent shall he entitled to fifty percent (50%) of the Earnest Money, not to exceed any agreed . 17 commission, and Seller hereby assigns to the listing agent such amount. in Execution Date. The Execution Date is the later of the two dates shown beneath the parties' 19 signatures below. 20 13. Governing Law. This Agreement is made and executed under.and in all respects shall be governed 21 and construed by the laws of the State of Oregon. ?? CONSULT YOUR ATTORNEY. THIS DOCUMENT HAS BEEN PREPARED FOR SUBMISSION TO YOUR 23 ATTORNEY FOR REVIEW AND APPROVAL PRIOR TO SIGNING. NO REPRESENTATION IS MADE BY 24 THE REAL ESTATE LICENSEES NAMED W THIS AGREEMENT AS TO THE LEGAL SUFFICIENCY OR 25 TAX CONSEQUENCES OF THIS AGREEMENT. 26 THIS FORM SHOULD NOT BE MODIFIED WITHOUT SHOWING SUCH MODIFICATIONS BY 27 REDLINING. INSERTION MARKS. OR ADDENDA. ✓ 28 Buyer: •f ;37777 /g• Seller: .� 29 V 30 . _JO By l,J,(lri+-4— A , /114044-L4*-, 31 e Title ((YY /'?MM ..f 32 Execution Date 70 ^0/ Execution Date /0/3//ol 33 Time of Execution Time of Execution _14 Home Phone Home Phone 35 Office Phone Office Phone 36 Address. Address 37 38 39 Fax No. Fax No. © 1997 Commercial Association of REALTORS® Oregon/Southwest Washington (Rev. 11/97) PURCHASE AND SALE AGREEMENT AND RECEIPT FOR EARNEST MONEY (OREGON) 5 • ADDENDUM `A' TO EARNEST MONEY AGREEMENT Between The City of Tigard and J.T. Roth, Jr., Buyer, for that certain real property described as all of Lot 32 and a part of Lot 31, Block 29, West Portland Heights, City of Tigard, Washington County, Oregon. The following terms and conditions are made a part of the above referenced Earnest - Money Agreement dated August /(2, 2001. 1. Purchase Price: $42,922. 2. Earnest Money Note and Approval Period: Buyer's earnest money deposit is $10,000, which will be released to the Seller immediately upon mutual acceptance of this offer. The earnest money shall apply to the purchase price.a. .d Is n,a.t- 3. Closing: Shall occur two hundred and forty days (240) days from date of mutual 1013//a acceptance of this offer. Contrary to any other provision in this Purchase and Sale Agreement, the Seller and the Buyer agree to split the cost of escrow. The Seller shall pay the cost of an owner's title insurance policy in the amount of the purchase price. Buyer agrees to pay all other closing cost including recording fees. 4. Hazardous Materials: The Seller(s) represent to the best of its ability, that there are no environmentally hazardous materials or wastes, including injection wells, contained on the property and that there are no potentially hazardous environmental conditions on the property. The Seller(s) further represent that no environmentally hazardous materials or wastes have been placed in a septic tank or drain field upon the subject property. The property has not been identified by any governmental agency as a site upon which or potentially upon which, environmental materials have been or may have been located or deposited. If subsequent to closing of this transaction by Buyers it should be determined that, as of the date of closing, environmentally hazardous materials were contained upon the property, Seller(s) shall indemnify and hold harmless Buyers from liability for hazardous waster or materials, including but not limited to cost of clean up and removal, penalties, fines and attorney's fees or in the alternative. Buyers may elect to rescind the transaction and all monies shall be promptly returned to Buyers and Buyers shall have no further obligation to the Seller(s). 5. Possession: Buyer shall be entitled to possession of the property at closing. Buyer and its representatives shall be permitted to enter upon the property during the time this agreement is in effect for the purpose of inspection, testing and legitimate purposes required in order for Buyer to complete its due diligence. Buyer shall indemnify and hold Seller(s) harmless from any loss, liability or damage to persons or property arising out of nr related to Buyer's entry upon the property. 6. Applications for Permits and Approval: Buyer shall have the right during the term of this agreement to apply for and obtain any and all public agency approvals and permits as are required or desired by Buyer. Seller(s), at no cost to Seller(s), shall cooperate with Buyer in this effort as requested by the Buyer, including signing any zoning or planning applications. 7. Special Conditions: The Seller represents that the property has been surveyed and that the square footage of the property is 3902 square feet. The purchase price has been established at $11.00 per square foot. If the property, is less than 3902 square feet the amount of the purchase price will be reduced accordingly. The Seller agrees to provide the Buyer with a copy of the survey. The Seller further states that the corners of the property have staked and marked by the surveyor. 8. The parties represent to each other that no real estate brokerage fee will be paid by any party for this transaction. Each party will be responsible for their own attorney's fees, if any. Sell- ): ; / J.T 'oth, .Ir. i Theresa A. Roth Dated: /lJ/J/ , 2001. Dated: ()) ,2001. =air -11111101Meadleitginiattrkligiagailiaiiiihiliilliarilat=Hr J. T. ROTH, JR. 241 75 1032 THERESA ROTH 13779 SW CHARLESTON LANE DATE 11/08/01 TIGARD, OR 97224 PAY TO THE ORDER OF First American Title Insurance Co. $ 10,000.00 Ten Thousand and No/100 -DOLLARS 8 Wells Fargo Bank Wells Portfolio WELLS 11760 Southwest Hall Boulevard 2 FARGO Tigard,OR 97223 www.wellsfargo.com MEMO Open escrow/City of Tigard "k. C) /-(1 Feb. 22, 2002 0 Re: Proposed Commercial Development Dear: Tigard Triangle Neighbor: As a requirement to gain approval for an application to perform improvements on my property,the City of Tigard requires that I notify property owners located within a 500ft. radius of the subject property. It is with this form that I am offering said notice. An informal meeting will be held on March 14, 2002 between the hours of 6:00 pm and 7:00 pm to discuss preliminary drawings/plans. The meeting will be held at my office located at 12600 SW 72" suite 200, Tigard, OR. I am proposing to develop approx. 18,000 sq. ft. of presently un-developed property located on tax lots 8300, 8500, 8600,8700 of West Portland Heights, or otherwise described as property between SW 68th and SW 69th, fronting SW Beveland. Improvements to said property would consist of approx. 7500 sq.ft. of professional office building. An invitation is extended to those parties interested. Please understand that this proposal is at the preliminary stages of development and any information given in this notice or during the informal meeting is subject to change or modifications. I look forward to discussing this proposal with you. Should you have any questions prior to the meeting time set above please contact Tim Roth at 503/639-2639. Res. lly .ubmitted, � • Jr. r,.T. Rath Construction, Inc. pp I9t5 -lased ssaippy ®A2i3AW Jack Biethan 11023 SW Summerfield Drive, #4 Tigard, OR 97224 Sue Rorman 11250 SW 82nd Avenue Tigard, OR 97223 Naomi Gallucci 11285 SW 78th Avenue Tigard, OR 97223 Michael Trigoboff 7072 SW Barbara Lane Tigard, OR 97223 Dieter Jacobs 7775 SW Spruce Street Tigard, OR 97223 Alexander Craghead 12205 SW Hall Boulevard Tigard, OR 97223-6210 David Chapman 9840 SW Landau Place Tigard, OR 97223 Nathan and Ann Murdock PO Box 231265 Tigard, OR 97281 CITY OF TIGARD - EAST CIT SUBCOMMITTEE (i:\curpinlsetup\labels\CIT East.doc) UPDATED: December 27, 2001 ®t9t5 Joj a;eidwa;asn N,,s;aaus naaa u;oows lasa> >qe� ssaippy ®A2 All 101600 2S 101 AA-08200 REET INVESTORS LLC DEFOE CHARLES E JR& W 68TH AVE STE 300 MCGEE JUDITH A OR 97223 12455 SW 68TH AVE PORTLAND,OR 97223 2S 101 AA-08100 01 AA-08301 A&RLLC DEF•. CH• ESEJR& 12480 SW 68TH PKWY STE A MCGEE '.11TH A TIGARD,OR 97223 1245 68 &VE P c-TLAND,OR 97223 2S 101 AB-02300 2S 101 AD-00800 BOLON DEAN N EQUITY GROUP FUND 1 LLC 4022 NE LADDINGTON CT BY KURT DALBEY PORTLAND,OR 97232 7125 SW HAMPTON PORTLAND,OR 97223 2S 101 AB-02200 2S 101 AD-01700 CASEY EDWARD L JR&JOANNE F E ITY GROUP ND 1 LLC 7085 SW BEVELAND RD BY KU EY PORTLAND,OR 97223 7125 AM PO LAND,OR 97223 2S 101 AA-07700 2S 101 AD-00803 CHORUBY PAUL N EQ GROUP F D 1 LLC 12520 SW 68TH AVE#A BY KURT D Y TIGARD,OR 97223 7125 S AMPTO PO LAND,OR 97223 2S 101 AA-07100 25 101 AC-00100 CORLISS JAMES L&CORA ETZEL DAVID M&NADINE M 9750 SW INEZ 13400 SW DOE LN TIGARD,OR 97224 TIGARD,OR 97223 2S 101 AA-07800 2S 101 AA-04900 CORLISS JAMES L&CORA K FAIRMARK INVESTMENTS LLC PO BOX 23970 PO BOX 901 TIGARD,OR 97281 TUALATIN,OR 97062 S 101 AA-05500 2S 101 AD-02400 C S JAMES L ORA K GEORGE FOX UNIVERSITY PO BOX 239 ATTN: FINANCIAL AFFAIRS D,OR 97281 414 N MERIDIAN NEWBERG,OR 97132 2 101AA-05700 2S101AB-00800 CO JAMES &CORA K HAMPTON PARK LLC PO BOX 2 BY WEST COAST MORTGAGE T ,OR 97281 5837 JEAN RD LAKE OSWEGO,OR 97035 2S 101 AA-09700 2S 101 AB-01000 DANA MARK R H MPTON PARK LLC 12585 SW 68TH AVE BY T COAST AGE TIGARD,OR 97223 5837 KE OSWEGO,OR 97035 ®1915 Jo4 ale;dwal asfl islaags paa. q;oows S Jas2; c--qe-1 ssaappry D.A2iaAb Eiii 1 \AA-05200 2S 101 AA-09108 OMARK FORD INC R&D PROPERTY DEVELOPMENT LLC p0 BOX 23970 12559 SW 69TH AVE TIGARD,OR 97281 TIGARD,OR 97223 2S 101 AA-04300 2S 101 AA-08700 LA RD INC ROTH J T JR&THERESA PO BOX 9 12600 SW 72ND AVE STE 200 TIGARD,OR 97281 TIGARD,OR 97223 2S 1 01 AA-06700 2S 1 01 AA-08300 LAN R RD INC ROTH J T JR HERESA PO BO 0 12600 S VE STE 200 TIG ,OR 9 81 TIGA ,OR 97223 2S 101 AB-02400 2S 101 AA-08500 LANFARM LLC TH J T JR HERESA 16869 SW 65TH AVE STE 166 1260 AVE STE 200 LAKE OSWEGO,OR 97035 TIG ,OR 223 2S 101 AA-04500 2S 101 AA-09800 LOUIE PROPERTY MANAGEMENT LLC OTH J T JR&T SA ATTN:RICHARD C LOUIE 12600 E STE 200 12381 SW WALNUT ST TIGAR ,OR 97223 TIGARD,OR 97223 2S 1 01 AD-02700 2S101AB-02500 MCCROSKEY JOHN B SHIM STEVE S&JANET H 1380 MORNING SKY CT 14347 SW KOVEN CT LAKE OSWEGO,OR 97034 TIGARD,OR 97224 2S 1 01 AD-02800 2S 101 AA-07900 MORTON DON R AND CYNTHIA SUE SPRINGER JERRY&C DIANNE TRS BY MAIL MEMONDAY-N JOHANNE 7400 SW FAIRWAY DR 3109 NE BROADWAY WILSONVILLE,OR 97070 PORTLAND,OR 97232 2S101AD-01400 2S101AA-08302 OREGON KI SOCIETY SZAMBELAN PETER J&ELOISE M 12700 SW 68TH AVE 3258 LAKEVIEW BLVD TIGARD,OR 97223 LAKE OSWEGO,OR 97035 2S 101 AD-00100 2S 101 AA-08800 PARROTT VIAL LLC TIGARD OF 12725 SW 66TH AVE#202 13125 HALL PORTLAND,OR 97223 TI D,OR 223 2S101AA-09600 2S1 -08600 PEIRCE STEPHEN W& TIGAR OF PEIRCE LYNN L 13125 LL 12560 SW 70TH TI RD,OR 23 TIGARD,OR 97223 ®19tS iO4 aleidwal as'1 Nlslaays paa yloows jaSe; ayel ssaippd �� 19IVU 0 0 CORPORATE CENTER rp PARTNERSHIP ATTN: GREG SPECHT 15400 MILLIKAN WAY BEAVERTON,OR 97006 2S101AA-09100 TI ' 9 CORPORATE CENTER LTD PA- ERSHI• ATTN: GREG -- T 15400 MI •N WAY BEAV 'TON,OR 97006 2S 101 AA-06400 TING ELON&SYLVIA BY WILLIAM R SOUTHARD 603 SE VICTORY AVE STE 100 VANCOUVER,WA 98661 2S 101 A0-02900 TRIANGLE TERRACE LLC 12600 SW 72ND AVE#200 TIGARD, OR 97223 2S 101 AC-00300 WEAVER MICHAEL D&GAIL B 7075 SW GONZAGA ST TIGARD,OR 97223 2S 101 AA-07600 WILHELM MICHAEL W TR 13085 SW 124TH AVE TIGARD,OR 97223 2S 101 AB-02800 ZEEK VELMA EDWARDS 7060 SW BEVELAND TIGARD,OR 97223 ®I9I5.1os al2idwal asn Alspays paaj yloows AFFIDAVIT OF MAIL G/POSTING NEIGHBORH( ) MEETING NOTICE IMPORTANT NOTICE: 'THE:APPLICANT IS REQUIRED TO MAIL THE CITY OF TIGARD A COPYOF THE NEIGHBORHOOD MEETING NOTICE THAT PERTAINS TO THIS AFFIDAVIT AT THE SAME TIME PROPERTY OWNERS ARE MAILED NOTICE, TO THE ADDRESS BELOW: City of Tigard Planning Division 13125 SW Hall Boulevard ;a Tigard, OR 97223-8189 IN ADDITION, THE APPLICANT SHALL SUBMIT THIS AFFIDAVIT&COPIES OF ALL NOTICES AT THE TIME OF APPLICATION. MAILING: I, J •T• t,-rt.1 , being duly sworn, depose and say that on the ZZ day of (° 20 a)2- , I caused to have mailed to each of the persons on the attached list, a notice of a meeting to discuss a proposed development at(or near) St-a 116vEe-Ar-o , 4_,1ween SW GZ 0...4( S.W(k , a copy of which notice so mailed is attached hereto and made a part of hereof. I further state that said notices were enclosed in envelopes plainly addressed to said persons and were deposited on the date indicated above in the United States Post Office located at "T o\cs..rcl O R • with postage prepaid thereon. I gn. rre (In the presence of a Notary Public) POSTING: CZ:7-v+-Sv. , do affirm that I am (represent) the party initiating interest in a proposed d�.,� lopw.er affecting the land located at (state the approximate location(s) IF no address(s) and/or taxjot(s) currently registered)72•4 Lo-rS 85aD,8� , 8�(�O,S?oO t�kst chat i4 e'ghtS , and did on the ,Z3 day of ' 46, , 20 02- personally post notice indicating that the site may be proposed for a ,Sc to dt✓el pivies-t1 f o cu., application, and the time, date and place of a neighborhood meeting to discuss the proposal. The sign was posted at 6571 5rde_ c-i< L'i SW 68 x (state location you posted notice on property) apgr5 Sign. ' - (In the presence of a Notary Public) (THIS SECTION FOR A STATE OF OREGON, NOTARY PUBLIC TO COMPLETE/NOTARIZE) STATE OF ) County of ) ss. Subscribed and sworn/affirmed before me on the _ day of ( 't,,/rc_- , 20 . F..., OFRCIAL SEAL '-�: NERE8A ROM NOTARY PUBl1C-OREGON �'�,L,�,;.� •'��-"fl-. com tavoN N0.337145 W COI1MISSON EXPIRESAUG.30,2001 NOTARY PUBLIC OF OREGON My Commission Expires: Si + Applicant, please complete the information below: NAME OF PROJECT OR PROPOSED DEVELOPMENT: 00 BtAa CaC.i TYPE OF PROPOSED DEVELOPMENT: Coi•.�t wee r u Q f-• /6..E Address or General Location of Subject Property: Su,/ !e R' t e--e-04-4A-0/ Subject Property Tax Map(s)and Lot#(s): .25/01 yy - 0 8300/ O(7500/-,26.00/O$700 h:iogiMpatty'nasters\alfidavit of mating-posting neighborhood meeting.doc — . • ,1 I ' .. j4r47ic,,2 --,43'4.2— t• 4 . 1.'iar. ' t 41 .''• . 4 4 • . ..,,,,,I,A ri.w,,,,, ,',,,:,t.,4.■•,-;-?,L., , . ... . „,..• ..11..' .* ' , .1 , .,,, .. ' "*,..,:7, ;, :,, • ,i.i- e , ' — . # h ' • r s : , ,•11 _01, ,, , 4# .. ..1, .t.' ii.'', -, . ., ...i • '', : .,,'",,', I. '. • '. ti- ..k' - ) • N, . 4 11404, . ■'. , ', t.■• ''' : i V .f i ti . .:,''''14'- ' .14 ' I • k, I. .' 1 i:111146,4 kt ' . • • t 'lit 4, .. ,...•,`:0'• r •'. -0 i ,,'•-....-.111P-i, si . "411446) ' s 0 • ' lit 1... 1:. • - • • .•4,1 •■■ - '' 0 i t 4 - a 4 , - •-44.' • 3 ' ' A - s .- • A . ' . • 1 . SS'. ';'1. '' ,'•..■ „ i A:' ...- 1 a ) it.4. 6 _ 11? , 'II ii... , ' ---A, . MICHAEL ,..)N4 11`I I , 1 1' 14 Of I' I; It 1. 1 1: .5 . 110111101011.11111111110111111110111111111111111111111111.1111.1111111111111111111111 . . . . . . 4t . • .., '.. * .- `. VA I I A B LE Iiii ...! . • . , . , . . . . , . . , • • . . . . : -.' •• .--4.:0,,,A,,..,-,ovit.oio.,.• -•- .. - • . ...,,4.1 ...0.47,, .r.,..,.,t.(.1-...rrta,-,,ir11.‘i IR} til ..^0",1-#IttoP4', ,. - .-,..,-.-, • an* 0 ' ; '. 010,11 W.r= ticalti.. ‘••,',.;4'•:•,••; ,,..1•1-.1.,• ,;'' .):■•••• .7:...,- :..%••• '':' ''. •.' . ... ,: ' •: : . • 14.0•SleAmo.hiv , • 41,1*44 - "1"""4*',.0.100.1 ,i,,,-`p...•■•' ,„ ' ,, '' ,. ,• ,' 14 .••:44,44,,,,... •::?'••••":'''',*,..!':V1/1,11.rit: '.'"14Mliltral'i.""'' ' ',' . : '''-':'*VIV,iilinif.:1 •1iiiii'i"4",471141141:1==4".4' /446'''4:-'''''**olio— .,' ft• . ' ' ihi '., t)t. •e‘''';.4'. 4'Ati.',",-01,,,t," ' 7 „. .‘ iw FFIC . . ., rt,..1,.. 41, . ni'ji. .. • • . ,',..!--/ • . • - ! PIO 044 . • ••in.... '-'•••.,•1,, : .,,,.:;- - ; . . . . , . ' • SIGN UP Public Hearing for Proposed Site Development March 14, 2002 SW Beveland between 69th and 68th,Tigard, Or. Tax Lot 8300., 8500, 8600, 8700, Block 29 West Portland Heights Please provide the following information: Name ( Address I City/Zip I Time I Signature 1 21 • _ .' .d P. k 17 222 11:00 2 1: '9w - • SRI 1nzs ro'-s7/� 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 j 10 I_ 11 I. 12 I 13 I 14 I Comments: (Please give name) 1 3-/e/-02. CleanWater Services Our commitment is clear. April 5, 2002 Tim Roth Jr. 12600 SW 72nd Ave. Suite 200 Tigard, OR 97223 Re: New commercial building located at 68th and Beveland, Tigard, OR CWS file 1875 (Tax map 2S101AA, Tax lots 08300, 08500, 08600, 08700) Clean Water Services has received your Sensitive Areas Certification Form for the above referenced site. Staff has reviewed the Sensitive Areas Certification Form and concurs that the sensitive area found during the pre-screen has been piped. In light of this result, the above referenced project does not need a Service Provider letter as required by Resolution and Order No. 00-7, Section 3.02.1 , and your Stormwater connection authorization from Clean Water Services as required by Ordinance 27, Section 4.B. All required permits and approvals must be obtained and completed under applicable local, state, and federal law. This concurrence letter does NOT eliminate the need to protect sensitive areas if they are subsequently identified on your site. If you have any questions, please feel free to call me at 503-846-3613. Sincerely, 66:61-'1 r • Heidi Berg I Site Assessment Coordinator G:\Development Svcs\SP 00-7\Concurrence Letters\2S 101 AA08300,08500,08600,08700-sens area piped.doc 155 N First Avenue, Suite 270• Hillsboro, Oregon 97124 Phone: (503)846-8621 • Fax: (503)846-3525 •www.cleanwaterservices.org 8700 Building PROJECT **JOB BUDGET** DEPOSITS Total Sq. Ft of Building 7,634.00 Total$/sf factor $84.92 Est.Cost to Construct s64s.264.00 I CSI Division % Estimate Soft Structure T.I. Sitelon) Site(off) 1.0 Gen Conditions -1.01 Plans ...:"1", $10,050.00 $10,050.00 -1.02 Permits $44,310.00 $44,310.00 -1.04 Tempt tilities 0. $1,604.00 $1,604.00 -1.05('lean.rough-final $2.900.00 92,900.00 -I.056 .11i.sc. 0,4-% $3,050.00 92,400.00 9650.00 Gen.Cond.TOTAL $61.91100 2.0 Sitework -2.01 Survey I.-rim% $9,050.00 $9,050.00 -2.02 Site Clearing i)..Ia i $3,000.00 $3,000.00 72.03 Building. E.rcay. 2.-4% $17,750.00 99,500.00 91,250.00 -2.04 Park lot grade rock _a" $34,000.00 934,000.00 -2.05 Utilities (oil-sites 6% $14,000.00 $14,000.00 -2.06 Parking lot Paving 2. $ % $13,500.00 $13,500.00 2.07 Road('onstruc•toff site) ,).00% $0.00 -2.08 off site utilities 0.00% $0.00 -2.09 Street misc. 0.00% $0.00 -2.10 Landscape i.>_% $12,500.00 $12,500.00 Sitcwork TOTAL. $103.500.00 3.0 Concrete -3.01 Formwork 2.38% $15,400.00 $15,400.00 -3.02 Flatwork :. i $11,100.00 $6,500.00 94,600.00 Concrete TOTAL. S26.5O0.00 4.0 Masonry -4.01 Brickwork $59,000.00 $59.000 00 Masonry TOTAL 559.000.0o 5.0 Steel Fabrication -5.01 Struct. Steel 1.99 $12,900.00 $12.90000 Steel Fab.TOTAL $1 2.900.00 6.0 Woods&Plastics -6.01 Rough Carp.mat. $39,400.00 $32500 00 $6,900.10 Trusses :.0J% $19,500.00 $1950000 Rough Carp lahor 6.09% $39,500.00 .535.500.00 $4,000.00 -6.02 Siding/Decks 0.62% $4,000.00 $4.000.00 -6.03 t•nderlav'Gvperete 1.0(1% $6,500.00 $6,500.00 Woods/Plastics TOTAL $108.900.00 7.0 Thermo/Moist. -7.01 Insulation 1.7-% $11,500.00 $8,500.00 $,000 00 -7.02 Roofing 0.96% $6,200.00 $6,200.00 -7.03 Sheetmetal 0.76% $4,900.00 $4.900.00 -7.04 Foundation 0.00% $0.00 $0.00 -7.05 Misc. 0.08% $500.00 $500.00 Thermo/moist.TOTAL $23.100.00 8.0 Doors/Windows -8.01.i.Iillwork'labor 1.99% $12,900.00 $5,400.00 $7,500.00 -8.02 Millwork mat. 2.25% $14,600.00 $3,100.00 $9.500.00 • 4.03 Windows ?.Oa% $19,700.00 $19,700.00 Doors/windows TOTAL. $47,200.00 9.0 Finishes -9.01 Gypsum Bd. $25,900.00 $14,800.00 $8,600.00 -9.02 Reflect.Ceil. 1.74% $11,300.00 x11.300.00 -9.03 Surfaces 3.04% $19,700.00 33.200.00 x14.500.00 -9.04 Painting 3.38 $21,900.00 $14.300.00 $5400.00 -9.05 Window covering 0.,r.`Sss, $5,500.00 S5.500 00 -9.06 Wall Paper 0.00% $0.00 $0.00 Finishes TOTAL $84.300.011 10.0 Specialties -10.01 Bath Accessories 0.39% $2,500.00 $2,500.00 -10.09 .%lisc. 0.59% $3,850.00 33.850.00 Specialties TOTAL $0 '11.1111 11.0 Equipment -11.01 Elevator 4.98% $32,300.00 $32.300.00 Equipment TOTAL $32.311u.uu 12.0 Furnishings -12.01 Casework 0.00% $0.00 x0.00 Furnishings TOTAL $0.00 15.0 Mechanical -15.01 Plumbing 1.80% $11,700.00 $8,100.00 x3.600.00 -15.02 111-IC 4.61% $29,900.00 $17,400.00 x12,500.00 -15.03 Central Vac 0.00% $0.00 $.00 Mechanical TOTAL $41.o00 00 16.0 Electrical -16.01 Basic Elect. 5.61% $36,400.00 S24,900 00 x11,500.00 -16.02 Fixtures 0.62% $4,000.00 54,000.00 Electrical TOTAL $40.-100 00 SUM TOTAL 100.00% S648.264.00 $38.780.00 $396,454.00 193,500.00 185,250.00 $4,800.00 I I I I I ,9opo sal/A/or rcthve April 3, 2002 City of Tigard Applicant/Owner: J.T. Roth, Jr. 13125 SW Hall 12600 SW 72`d# 200 Tigard, Or. 97223 Tigard, Or. 97223 Attn: Planning Dept. RE: Site Design Review—8700 Building Tax lot 8300, 8500, 8600, 8700 (S.W. 68`" and Beveland) NARRATIVE: Application for a Site Development review for the development and construction of a commercial office building located at S.W. 68th and Beveland. The following criteria addresses the Tigard Triangle Standards as well as the relevant development codes. Chapter 18.67- MUE Zoning: The designed use of the proposed improvements is office commercial which is consistent with this zoning. More specifically, as it is called out in chapter 18.67.030, the category would be classified as "Professional and Administrative Services". -The maximum floor area ratio (FAR)has been addressed on the site plan, total area of land is 17,866 s.f. with total area of improvements equaling 7,146 s.f., (not including the un-useable square footage such as elevator shaft and elevator equipment room, etc.) or the maximum 40% allowable. 18.67.070 Design Standards A. -Street Connectivity: The standard option applied to this site is the Design Option whereas access to the site, off S.W. 68th, is approx. 75' from a local thru-street, S.W. Beveland. This will satisfy the 660 feet for a public street as well as the 330 feet for a pedestrian connection. B. —Site Design Standard: The total area of land being proposed for development is less than 1 acres so a phased development plan is not required. 1. Building Placement: The frontage streets for this site (corner) are S.W. 68th and S.W. Beveland. S.W. 68th is a"minor collector" and S.W. Beveland is a"local street" consequently the requirement of the building to "occupy a min. 50% along Major and Minor Arterial Streets" is satisfied by the placement of the improvements at this corner. (see site plan) 2. Building setback: The placement of the building from a public street is within the 0 to 10 setback.. (see site plan) 3. Front yard setback design: A hard-surfaced pedestrian path has been provided between the entrance of the structure and public streets. Landscaping has been provided between the structure and the public street, refer to section "F. Landscaping and Screening"of the Standards for definition of landscape requirements, also as is addressed in this Narrative. (see landscape plan submitted with this application) 4. Walkway connection to building entrance: A six(6) foot walk has been provided between the building entrance and a public street (street sidewalks). (see site plan) 5. Parking location and landscape design: Parking is located on the west side of the structure. Parking does not exceed 50% of the street frontage and is screened behind a landscaped area of 5' or greater. (see site plan) C. -Building Design Standards: 1. Ground floor windows: The minimum 50%ground floor window area being measured from three feet above grade to nine feet above grade of the entire width of the street-facing elevation has been met. (see 1"floor plan,page 4 and elevations pages 6 &7 of the submitted architectural drawings) 2. Building facades: The building facade facing the public streets(S.W. 68th & S.W. Beveland) are 39' and 61' (respectively) in length and is broken with a vertical columns of a brick veneer smaller in size than that of the body brick. This complies with sub-section"(a) a variation in building materials". Since the facade does not exceed 300' a pedestrian connection is not required. 3. Weather protection: The storefront entrance is protected with a 2' facade to provide the necessary weather protection at the main building entrance. 4. Building Materials: Exterior building materials for this structure are a brick veneer, no restricted materials(per standards) are being used. The structured foundation is concrete and finish floor is set at an elevation consistent with the existing topography grade. Since the total exterior wall area will be covered with a brick veneer no foundation will be exposed. 5. Roofs and roof lines: The roof parapet is a continuation of the building face, consequently the materials are the same as the building. 6. Roof-mounted equipment: The roof parapet is designed to visually screen the roof top mounted equipment. D. —Signs: The proposed project is a non-residential development within a MUE zoning, consequently the signage requirements for this project (see attached sign design) comply with the C-P zoning found in chapter 18.114.130—D. *The site sign is a freestanding multifaced sign *The height does not exceed 10" *The total sq. footage is less than 32 s.f. *The sign is to be located at the entrance to the site 2 F. Landscaping and Screening: Since this project fronts two local streets the landscaping design follows the requirements defined in chapter 18.100. 18.96 - Additional Yard Setback Requirements and Exceptions. *The frontage streets to this project, S.W. 68th and SW Beveland, are not singled out in the development codes as requiring any special setbacks from centerline. *Adjacent properties to the west and north are zoned MUE and are currently being developed as commercial, properties to the south and east are dedicated public streets. Therefore, there are no special setbacks required for this site. 18.98 - Building Height Limitations: Exceptions *The building height(two story building) does not exceed the maximum height of 75' for non-residential buildings therefore this project complies. 18.100 Landscaping and Screening *see Landscaping and Screening discussed earlier in this narrative. *see Landscape plan, page 2, of blue print drawings submitted with application. *see Tree Plan submitted with application. *Street trees were previously planted through an L.I.D. performed by the City of Tigard *since this is a commercial use and adjacent properties are same, no special buffering of the property lines is required. 18.102 Visual Clearance Areas *This site is located at a street intersection and the building design has provided for a"line-of-sight" setback even though the setback requirements defined in the Triangle Standards would over-ride. 18.106—Of Street and Loading Requirements *Parking design and data are noted on page 1 of blue print drawings submitted with this application. *Bicycle parking is noted on page 1 of blue print drawings. 18.108—Access, Egress, and Circulation *see Site Plan, page 1 of blue print drawings, submitted with this application. 18.114 —Signs *see Signs discussed earlier in this narrative. 18.116—Mixed Solid Waste and Recyclables *see Site Plan, page 1 of blue print drawings, submitted with this application. *a letter from Pride Disposal addressing enclosure will be submitted. 3 18.120—Site Development Review *as required. 18.150—Tree Removal *this site does not include any existing trees to be mitigated 18.164—Street and Utility Improvement Standards *the frontage streets impacted by this site have all been improved through an L.I.D. constructed by the City of Tigard. There are no additional improvements needed. The approach to the site is existing which eliminates the need for a street opening permit. A letter from Clean Water Services is included with this application stating that this project does not require a Service Provider letter. The above narrative was intended to address the applicable approval standards by either discussing the criteria as it applies to the subject project or calling out the appropriate document submitted with this application. Sub d: 1,f I /. . Ro Jr. 4 PRELIMINARY DETENTION AND WATER QUALITY CALCULATIONS FOR TRIANGLE VIEW PLACE T2S, R1 W, SECTION 1 AA, TAX LOTS 8300, 8500, 8600, 8700 CITY FILE # SDR 2002-00006 May 14, 2002 Prepared by: Compass Engineering 6564 SE Lake Road Milwaukie, Oregon 97266 503/653-9093 Job No. 4287.1 GENERAL The purpose of these calculations are to support and demonstrate compliance with the Water Quality and Detention requirements for this proposed commercial development in the City of Tigard. WATER QUALITY CALCULATIONS Site Impervious Area Total Lot Area = 17,866 S.F. 85% = 15,186 S.F. = 0.35 acres impervious 15% = = 0.06 acres pervious Using 1/3 of a 2-year storm as basis for determining the required flow to represent the first flush from the site. With the King County Surface Water software it was determined that the peak flow for the above event is 0.08 cfs. This project proposes two storm water management catch basins each of which is capable of processing 0.033 ft3/sec. These devices have an internal overflow which will allow higher storms to by-pass the system. The roof water can be directed through the catch basins to process the total impervious area. PRE-DEVELOPED Time of Concentration Sheet Flow 200 ft L = 200 Ns= 0.20 P2 = 2.5 in So= 0.03 = 0.42(�hs)(LR0.8 = 0.42c(0.20)(200))°8 (P2)o• (So) " (2.5) • (0.43)°.4 = 20.6 minutes Pre-developed 2- year Peak Flow C = 0.30 (unimproved) i = 0.81 in/hr at T = 20.6 minutes A = 0.41 acres Q = CiA = (0.30)(0.81)(0.41) = 0.10 cfs Developed Site C = 0.85 i = 2.49 A = 0.41 Q = CiA = (0.85)(2.49)(0.41) = 0.87 cfs From the determination of required detention work sheet the required volume is 528 ft3. Using a 25-year developed and 2-year pre-developed release rate. Tank Size Volume = rrR2L Length = Volume rrR L Assume 36" 0 Pipe L = 528 = 75ft rr(2.25) References i. Design enot construction Standards for Sann`a/y Sewer nd Su/face Water Management by Unified Sewerage Agency, dateo'duly 1996: 2. a Oregon Depaniment of Transponti aton Highway Division Hydraulics anual, prepared by the Hydraulics Unit, January 199°- 3. Sufface Water M Quality Facilities Technical 19 Guidancandbook for Portland Cake Oswego, Clackamas County, and al e H Sewerage Agency, by Brown and Caldwell Consultants, dated August 94 DETERMINATION OF REQUIRED DETENTION STORAGE 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 TIME, MIN. CA, ACRES RAIN INTEN. INFLOW RATE INFLOW VOL. OUTFLOW RATE OUTFLOW VOL. REQ. STOR. in/hr cfs cu. ft. cfs cu. ft. cu. ft. 5 0.35 2.45 0.86 258 0.10 30 228 6 0.35 2.30 0.81 292 0.10 36 256 7 0.35 2.20 0.77 323 0.10 42 881 8 0.35 2.10 0.74 355 0.10 48 307 9 0.35 2.00 0.7 378 0.10 54 324 10 0.35 1.90 0.67 402 0.10 60 342 15 0.35 1.60 0.56 504 0.10 90 414 20 0.35 1.40 0.49 588 0.10 120 468 25 0.35 1.23 0.43 645 0.10 150 495 30 0.35 1.10 0.39 702 0.10 180 522 35 0.35 1.00 0.35 735 0.10 210 525 40 0.35 0.09 0.32 768 0.10 240 528 4k 45 0.35 0.84 0.29 783 0.10 270 513 50 0.35 0.79 0.28 840 0.10 300 627 Table 2.1 RUNOFF COEFFICIENTS FOR THE RATIONAL METHOD ROLLING HILLY FLAT 2% - 10% OVER 10% Pavement & Roofs 0.90 0.90 0.90 Earth Shoulders 0.50 0.50 0.50 Drives & Walks 0.75 0.80 0.85 Gravel Pavement 0.50 0.55 0.60 City Business Areas 0.80 0.85 0.85 Apartment Dwelling Areas 0.50 0.60 0.70 Light Residential : 1 to 3 units/ac. 0.35 0.40 0.45 Normal Residential : 3 to 6 units/ac. 0.50 0.55 0.60 Dense Residential : 6 to 15 units/ac. 0.70 0.75 0.80 Lawns 0.17 0.22 0.35 Grass Shoulders 0.25 0.25 0.25 Side Slopes, Earth 0.60 0.60 0.60 Side Slopes, Turf 0.30 0.30 0.30 Median Areas, Turf 0.25 0.30 0.30 Cultivated Land, Clay & Loam 0.50 0.55 0.60 Cultivated Land, Sand & Gravel 0.25 0.30 0.35 Industrial Areas, Light 0.50 0.70 0.80 Industrial Areas, Heavy 0.60 0.80 0.90 Parks & Cemeteries 0.10 0. 15 0.25 Playgrounds 0.20 0.25 0.30 Woodland & Forests 0.10 0. 15 0.20 Meadows & Pasture Land 0.25 0.30 0.35 Unimproved Areas 0.10 0.20 0.30 2.4.7.2 Rainfall Intensity "i" The rainfall intensity "i" indicates the severity of the rainfall . Rainfall intensity is related to the rainfall duration and the statistical recurrence interval of the design storm. In the rational method the rainfall intensity corresponding to a duration equal to the time of concentration (Sec. 2.4.7.3) is used to calculate the peak flow. The rainfall intensity can be selected from the appropriate intensity-duration-frequency (I-D-F) curve found in Appendix 2.A. 11 RAINFALL INTENSITY - DURATION - FREQUENCY CURVES 5.0 ■■ ■ u w�..—.... . u. nu.uu uu uun ..........111. i i ���...■...........■111IIIIIIII.....I11111IIII IIIIIII .......II.11111 == I III = 1••...........II■■1IIIIII.III....IIIIII■1.111111 1 1 :C:::1:1111111iiuiiiiIu1IIiiiC�...........11111111111I1I1 1M1111111111111111i� 111I1111 4.0 •::::331:=11=====__=-- i--- . ._ Nun: Zone 7 ...1 iliii�:1======== I...'��illiii ., ,,,.1, 3.0 "C------... M------ ir ,._I I 1 ..--...-. .■.■_■ = j Ili amass-- ... =..•2..1'I..lil .iil.ii■.-----....= I...i...i.... = Ili Ii------ I : .....-.../i.t.'•,1 1 1���......■ ■...1 .11 /moms] ...... i ���.........■ .1. ■i�.111. 1,.• i�i 11 ��1n=........■■............1..11...........1.111.1. l 11 m��.....■ 1.1 ■..........:•■ppi Mills.'1 1111�b0��........■....■./1I11IIIII1111111111ii 111 1•=�................1 111111 11 ■......uu1111I.ii111Ill•1�1■\\•■.■■.......I1■111111.I111.....U.11111111111IIII 111�I.�=�............I.I11111111I11 ■..I.r:_.1111111111.:. I I . ■■.........11.11 1111 I.I....II1II1 1111111 III 111 NB�MM............IIIIIII11II1I1 2.0 ■.......I.:!�1111111Ii111ii:�a1.rim■Ii�■■.......11111IIIIIIli1......11111111111111 111 11 1�1■•...■■■.......1IIt1111111111 ■....!...11111�:•g11 11 I mamin:5■■Iis.......11. um 11 ......t millimil i II 1■=...■■■■.......111IIIIII11I11 L ■1111111:!1111111 ■IIIIIIIMMOM MIIMI �l■1111 111111111111■111111111111111111 I r•.�.■■■■■.■..Iilit11u1111111 7 ■.11111111111::! Iiiilll Iii!\MIN∎2■■g5�■\:11111111111111111■I■11111111111111111I III III • ma.■■■■■■■■..IIIIIIIIIIIIII! O 1111111111111111111 i'iIIIIIIIR\�0■■∎240b �11i:1111111111111111 111111111111111111 1!I IIi It ....■■■11■■Ii111a111111111111i L IIIIII1111111111 Illiilllli::mismim ■■■:�11i!Illi:1111111111111111111111111111111 HI II i••■11■■■■■1■111111111111IIIIIII C U■ IIIIInI:;!1111 1111 IIIII III\►.\�1�i:��IIii:�11i:�11 1!111 IIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIII IiiIII■■■NU■■IIIIIIIIIIIIIII1111111 In II1111111111h11:NIIIIlli s I■■\iO��.`.�I1t in III:IUiLlII�IIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIII iii 1 IIIU•NEMENIIIIIIIIIIIIIIII IIIIII L 1111111111111111111IIid..!= 1■111101111:1111101011M11111111111111111111111111I•■■i■■ui1111111111111111111111I 1.0 11111111111111111111111111111\211■■11110111M111111!�Ilu;ll�:11111111111111111111111111■11■■1111111111111111111111111111 ...nit::i:1111:1===---_ -- -.. 1.-"---li ::e:::i:::::::3ili:ai;====___ ------ .i• o.e ...:::::: :3 ii s111_=5===-- •�:•1:::-- ' 111':?3 311'N====ESS ..I .hill•i...-__------- =,1-- ` �,1}:..1.I a.I!_______-- in 0.T ... ... ... .. i. - Z ■..rail.°l i'1i�11"--- --.o ..• 0.I.m .Iil••.Iiim--•----- 0.6 n ..--------- - .Iw �.■ •.i■ a ,I ,I ------- ■u iIs�II� �IIiI---------.e .aI...1. .., ..aE11I■ !q� a-------- .,.1 Z II. li immin......■ m�.■ _■ .�..II..! �I 1 . \�►e. .1. 1151 �... .■■=nL■1:4mni1.-,I.iI13fi1,��...�. I Hid 0.5 ..nnn ut su,e ... auuu.. :nlm∎..��..a- ■....II..1111111III �1M�M....•.•...•.. ■11111111111...■:...111111.•f11 1 �imm.���.■....■■■■■..■...111 1.11 --I ■..........1./1111 11!`1 II��=�............■ HP 11111111.....1!.1111 111.:! ii 11���.OSIZ M■.�•...■.11.111111111.1 J ■•••.II.11I11111111 ��11I 11—�M�••■.......1111M11111111111••••110111911111111111.4. II�1�►�1.1•�41:5110..:�...1..111I1111I11 100 Yr. < 0.4 ■■..■1■11111111111i1III I I��....■■■■.....I.III.I11m1......I1ibmili lli1 1���...._..s_■..o..III1111i11.i1 ------ ::::1'1...'..1--------- 51..1,1' .------- ...1;..1.--,-------�...:....-........... -------- S. ,1.-----------._� ..:4611••,111. Q i...1-------- i...�.— - 51.51..:._•-... 25 Yr. oC 0.3 -----5151.. ..��-- .� -..■.: 51,51-----5151. 5151 —��-- .:.......-••:5151 un u,I11111=--...51. 1 ius1—■.�.-... m m.--......■ un m 1 uI�-��.........■ u u.--5151. .0 m u--�.,-5151...■■.� .. - IIII•liifl'ili i31Cll=1=1.1= ..1..11111■ i1= 1'; 11ID�22ran.0 =II:i. I..I 10 Yr. ■.........1/11/1111 III 11���...■.............111.111111■......111111111111 1IIII��MI�...■.:\......1111:!11111111 •.... ::11111111111 1 1'C�:.....u....u.C::Cii11111111.I..uuCC11111111111 i i I 1 C=C::::111:�;1111111111I1�11.•.:1 0.2 .....I.II1I11111111 111 11 Ili.��..■.■■.......1IIIIIIIIIIII�.....1.111111111111 I�;II II�MM.........111MIZ .1111.11I11.I 5 Yr. ■5151.■ II1tI1 1 1 ���....■■......IIIIIII I I 1 ■..III1II1111 1111111111.111111171111111.11111MHIGISMI■...'i11.t111�111� 1 I!I II1.l■�.■■■■■........I.11� 1 1 1 ■.IIt.1t��1�� ■.I■ 11111111 1 � i 11 II II11==��•MIIIMI�� IIIIII 111 lll��I��11111111111! I ��1111•1•MIIIIIIIIMIllillliilli 2 Yr. 111111111111111111 I 11 111111111111111111111111 11111111111•MIN■■■■■11111111111111111111 111111111111I111111I 11111111M1■■11�•■■■■1■111111111111111111 111111111111111111111 ii 111111iiiiiiiiiiiiii' II 11111•1•11111111111111111111111111111111111 11111111111111 I111 11111111111••••111111111111111111111111111 I I IIIN■UUUIU111111111111111I1iII 11 1 111111iiiiII1II iII 111•111111111111111111111111111111111110 0.1 111111111111111IIII11IIIiiII■■■UIIIII11111111111iIII111111111111111IIIIII1111IIII I UII11IIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIII . 4 5 6 T 8 9 10 15 20 25 30 40 50 60 TO 80 100 150 200 300 400 RAINFALL DURATION, Minutes •• • r - 2 SBUH/SCS METHOD FOR COMPUTING RUNOFF HYDROGRAPH STORM OPTIONS : 1 - S .C.S . TYPE-lA 2 - 7-DAY DESIGN STORM 3 - STORM DATA FILE SPECIFY STORM OPTION : 1 S .C. S . TYPE-1A RAINFALL DISTRIBUTION ENTER: FREQ(YEAR) , DURATION(HOUR) , PRECIP ( INCHES ) 1, 24, 0 . 86 ******************** S .C.S . TYPE-1A DISTRIBUTION ******************** ********* 1-YEAR 24-HOUR STORM **** . 86" TOTAL PRECIP . ********* ENTER: A(PERV) , CN(PERV) , A( IMPERV) , CN( IMPERV) , TC FOR BASIN NO . 1 0 . 06, 86, 0 . 35,98, 2 . 0 DATA PRINT-OUT: AREA(ACRES ) PERVIOUS IMPERVIOUS TC(MINUTES ) A CN A CN . 4 . 1 86 . 0 . 3 98 . 0 2. 0 PEAK-Q(CFS ) T-PEAK (HRS ) VOL(CU-FT) . 08 7 .67 862 ENTER [d: ] [pathlfilename [ .extl FOR STORAGE OF COMPUTED HYDROGRAPH: A: 4278 . 1.hyd FILE ALREADY EXIST; OVERWRITE (Y or N) ? V REVISIONS 270'4' 100'4' cote il it.'4' ' i pr 1 * - 4,-40 . 7,) I 1 . L �, J II a. _ . _ .r 1 ._ . c=='''IN "A.,_........Lr‘ r r C (11() a Il - 4 ) $ a BUILDING m I I N to Wr r.< ,wes. N y+ pt "'tbs. I P : m cr ,-,...F—j: . —f• I I 10 if z yI O kl I6,-0 451-0 ze-o. l' 16,4' q�-0. 71'4' — 6'4' r"a " f— 111 PARKING DATA: SITE PLAN: 1 oc3 BUILDING AREA 7634 50.FT. Z 1— 0- I'•20'-0+ 7,6 x 3.3. 25 SPACE5 ALLOWED l�Z 3 . SPACES SNCHN 25 TOTAL STANDARD 14 EA. N W VAN ACC NC 1 EA. 0 E LEGAL DES: u COMPACT 1A. TOTAL 25 SPACES SEE ATTACH Z O J FAR DATA: SITE DATA: Q � Q TOTAL NET FLOOR AREA 7.146 50.FJ, TOTAL LOT SIZE 17,866.50,FT. 5 H i TOTAL SITE AREA 17,866 SQ.FT.• 4(3 BUILDING LOT COVERAGE 3,701.5Q,FT. 20.7% CO'1 F LANDSCAPING AREA 3,414. SOFT. I9.1% TOTAL GROSS FLR AREA 7634. SO.FT. PAVING AREA 10,75I.50.FT. 60.25 r. LESS 1ST FLR ELEVATOR - 132. 17,866. SQ.FT,- 100.0% l,•m 2ND FLR ELEVATOR - 132, ma Km STAIRWELL 2 EA - 224 ,Ap WI PLAN TOTAL NET FLR AREA 714, SOFT, ). ~ REVISIONS r • L I Ro° o'rC3 FP ii". . 42i► b ^r 4 V. I ti ..9. AtiOL2 0, vir 113)0. a BUILDING o , •°Ial 11) %V ,ryi.e, °°4..........:'xea... . -.7..7«...'o'dohoa ^ �. N I . 6 m NSI I I LANDSCAPING PLANS 1".201 0 -. I LANDSCAPING SCHEDULE LANDSCAPING NOTES: I-a- 'z'k CODE JGMT. CS1nON NM1E5 I BOTANICAL NAMES 1 SIZE SPACING V 2 3 ■ TREES 'M .44...... I. ALL LANDSCAPING TO BE IRRIGATED BY AN — A T-CP 1 10 CVANTIELEE?EAR PTRUS CAUERUANA'GL'.M3?OW �1 1/2'CAL AS NOTO V'0 W .t T-J1G I A CORAL BARK JAPANESE rAPLC ACER PALrATU1"SAIIGGKAAU' v CAL. ' • AUTOMATIC 7NREE STATION UNDERGROUND W U N '�0B SPRINKLER SYSTEM. Q 60—5-D? I A DWARF PINE I PINJS nUGO m.GN•U5 2 GAL AS NOTED =Lii 030—J5-AZ A AZA!?S I AZALES DWARF"41lTE5' 2 GAL I ' ' k5 I-, rr■—5-DV 4 DAVID VIeURNUn VIBURNUn DAVICII 7 GAL ' 2. ALL LANDSCAPING TO BE PLANTED IN z O 5-PA 4 PTRAEIDAL ARBCRvl1AE "TNUJA OCCIDENTALI5 7VRAt110AL15 2 GAL I ' ' Q N z f---5444: A DWARF WPM CTPRU5S CFUI^AECTPARIS CSTUSA'NANL' 2 GAL PREPARED SOIL FAITH X h'UMUS )S AMENDED, `L 1,G-KK A CNNIKINN:[ ARCTOSTARJTLCS UVA URSI FLAT IS'CE E�+ AND NATIVE SOIL. , F.i 3. TREE MITIGATION PLAN NOT REQUIRED. NO CO,H EXISTING 7REE5 ON SITE. w M1Hn2 wI.2, or PON r SRI PLAN S. r r r ISION ,SONINI 210717 P010 t N l■ 1k i: I 17 -viii_ 11 -_ I€Y 1 U � I : � = i- 1 II I . i_4- - if [ I �---t 1 I 101 ® % V 1 1I I 1 _ 4. �1 ! f li i Z _1`. s \ \ R Wyk, i t• J rr TRIANGLE VIEW PLACE �.' inn I l If i r EEC∎. Main Floor 'ail ■_____ twt Alaww I.. _ -. 14114 3 1 . i r ^ II �. +� rY M MIMI 1 •I Woo. li0, O11 ON I'M 910# / MM.A• Pr•1111, i A// • A. ( 1111-a .._ i -- -- N7 0 I ■�� 4 O 111 1 I q g4 1 O O 1 ; j, iNO �IIIIIi sI ij I 11:1 iI I til I I IM111Y Ali M00,4 W I . T°�I m, noe NM On MN i MOO ..o, PIM wlr M/.I , ',../ PIM MC Iii CUM le aIN f rit ,I I-ft umuaMq f ■ M+>'wr f I+ 1.11.400 NM N >< :a 4 M MOM lcvISINS or X4-1--- cos rr rr 5 w nor Mull w r .Cr. • Mr Z _... ' X1111 1.111 Al A i i io noa urf r -- ,, U.... SEEM iiii l ml MIN' WEST ELEV. cr � "•Y 1 w w 1111 11 I1 ■;u •�■ _ lea --S PDW EAST ELEV. IN-1%1 Ilk Mir panIab BY ■.■ ■■11 Ems ,1111010 u• I rt,317 II iii ii Iii iii L ,._. ■■m ... .1. ■■■ um 1 1 III 11 III III 11] W U a NORTH ELEV. Icim 0a' p,� - - . ..■. ■■ ■■', ■m III..m■ t■ 11 111 I1 II I1 II ..,- r on •■■ U. = U. Rte'■ ■E i'l' II I 11 7 I1 III II ' Sue ..071LKy - �' POW ■ we 114.14' Jf N • SOUTH ELEV. - 17ar15p 0 r+&+IO r lnpac+ Stud LANCASTER engineering May 21, 2002 Tim Roth 12600 SW 72nd Avenue, Suite 200 Tigard, OR 97 RE: Triangle View Place traffic report Dear Mr. Roth: This letter report addresses the anticipated trip generation, distribution and assignment of the office development proposed on the north side of Beveland Road between 68`h Avenue and 69th Avenue in Tigard, Oregon. The development proposes a 7,634 square foot office building with accesses to 68h Avenue and 69th Avenue. Both accesses will be shared with buildings to the north of the site. Trip Generation To estimate the number of trips that will be generated by the 7,634 square foot pro- posed office building, trip rates from TRIP GENERATION, Sixth Edition, published by the In- stitute of Transportation Engineers (ITE) were used. The trip rates used were for land-use code 710, General Office Building. The average rates were used, since the fitted curve equation shows a Y-intercept of 38 weekday trips and 79 evening peak hour trips. That is, according to the fitted curve equation, even a very small office building will generate a minimum of 79 eve- ning peak hour trips. For the 7,634 square foot office building, the calculations indicate that there will be an estimated total of 12 trips generated during the morning peak hour. Of these, 11 will be enter- ing and 1 will be exiting the site. The evening peak hour will have an estimated 11 trips, of which 2 are entering and 9 are exiting the site. The daily trip generation will be 84 trips, with half entering and half exiting the site. Union Station, Suite 206•800 NW 6th Avenue•Portland,OR 97209•Phone 503.248.0313•Fax 503.248.9251 Tim Roth May 21, 2002 Page 2 of 2 Trip Distribution and Assignment The directional distribution of the trips generated by the proposed land use was esti- mated from the nature of the land use, the nearby land uses, and the primary routes which will serve the site. All traffic destined to and from the south on the I-5 Freeway was assumed to use the ORE 217 interchange with 72"d Avenue. It was assumed that the majority of the trips would use 72"d Avenue with some trips using 68th Avenue to get to ORE 217. Of the traffic to and from the north, it was assumed that some of the trips would take Dartmouth to ORE 217 and the rest of the trips were split between the 72' Avenue route to Highway 99W and Dartmouth Street route to the I-5 Freeway. Although the site is located between 68th Avenue and 69th Ave- nue, it was assumed a slight majority of the trips would use 68th Avenue since access onto 68th Avenue appears to be more convenient for the internal traffic flow than access onto 69th Ave- nue. Traffic flow diagrams showing the existing traffic, site trip distribution, site trip as- signment, and existing plus site-generated traffic are attached as an appendix to this letter re- port. If there are any questions regarding this letter or if we can be of any further assistance, please do not hesitate to give us a call. Yours truly, FoK C.ATRiOA/A Catriona Sumra' Engineering Technician attachment: Technical Appendix EO PROFFs r#Guv%s% OREGON ,% )40 w4P9,25) 4'0 E. hid& EXPIRES: /7 h7/20,2_ , r LL TECHNICAL APPENDIX ti TRIP GENERATION CALCULATIONS Land Use: General Office Building Land Use Code: 710 Variable: 1000 Sq Ft Gross Floor Area Variable Value: 7.6 AM PEAK HOUR PM PEAK HOUR Trip Rate: 1.56 Trip Rate: 1.49 Enter Exit Total Enter Exit Total Directional Directional 88% 12% 17% 83% Distribution Distribution Trip Ends Trip Ends � ..:.:... .: . ..... ....... WEEKDAY SUNDAY Trip Rate: 11.01 Trip Rate: 0.98 Enter Exit Total Enter Exit Total Directional Directional 50% 50% 50% 50% Distribution Distribution Trip Ends 42 4 $4 Trip Ends 7 Source:TRIP GENERATION,Sixth Edition °r' 1---;. " "O t101 )N- <-234 .--N E— 126 <-1 4/ 1-> V90 E-J.1/L \-54 48--T El TO 1743 ITI-› 410--> ^°� 443 (0rn 151-q, ._cv 23 c\.- SW Dartmouth Street NA (L) C c c -L. o Q Q Q 0 13 t r r c N N N cr) co 3 3 3 3 cr) cn cn PROJECT SITE SW Bevelond Rood J No Scale le TRAFFIC VOLUMES Existing Conditions - PM Peak Hour NP1.dwg °1 0 i ito' K SW Dartmouth Street X09 • • 10% 10% 1 0 it1 w �. c c C - L Q Q Q 4 t s t c .. 0 cr) co 3 3 3 v) v) v) PROJECT SITE SW Beveland Road J 0 °� o� �l, �o No Scale le' TRIP DISTRIBUTION Inbound & Outbound Percentages - PM Peak Hour NP1.dwg t2 t0 00o f—0 000 0 EJ 4,y .c-° EJ,I, y NG- 1 o-T r> o'' i1'r� o—> '-"o o '-"0 0�, o� SW Dartmouth Street 0 0 0 >, 3 3 3 3 C C C Y > 0 > 0 Q Q Q a. L t L C N o CO (r) Cr (r) u7 PROJECT SITE SW Beveland Road J ap ,p No Scale le" TRAFFIC VOLUMES Site Trips - PM Peak Hour NP1.dwg or. 50 (O"O 101 "N� F—234 `°-N 126 0.,y .F 90 E�.1,y X55 48j (-1T1 174- �ITf> 410—� �^2 4141 111; „°'��O) 151-4, (V 23 cc.— SW Dartmouth Street NJ--...........*:\ >, a.) o o o 3 c c c -x L. Q Q Q a v t t -c c ... N. N (0 CO 3 3 3 3 cr) (r) PROJECT SITE SW Beveland Road i gkir No Scale le TRAFFIC VOLUMES Existing + Site Trips - PM Peak Hour NP1 dwg r-nipact Study IMPACT STATEMENT TRIANGLE VIEW PLACE Purpose The purpose of the Impact Study is to review existing public facilities and address any proposed modifications to these that will help mitigate the proportionate project impacts that will likely occur as a result of development. All necessary facilities for serving this site are currently in place in SW 68th, SW 69th Avenues and Beveland Street and are be constructed to serve this site. The transportation system, storm water, sanitary, water and other private utilities are all available and adequate in the immediate vicinity of the subject property. A detailed traffic report was prepared by Lancaster Engineering. Transportation System SW 68th 69th and Beveland Streets are all existing 60 foot right-of-ways. The existing 32 foot width with curbs and sidewalks will accommodate this development's increase in traffic. We expect no adverse impacts to the current capacity of these streets. Drainage Systems The proposed drainage system will be collected via a piped system and be treated by a water quality and detention facility. The designs will be in accordance with the standards set up by Clean Water Services. The treated water will then be released to the existing storm drain line in SW 69th Avenue. Detention will be required for this site based on Standards of the City of Tigard. Detention will be accommodated by a in-ground tank. Water Systems There is an existing 12-inch water line in SW 69th and a 12 inch in SW 68th. We are proposing to connect to the line in SW 68th , this line will supply more than adequate flow and pressure for the proposed domestic and fire flows to the proposed office complex. Sanitary Sewer System Sanitary sewer service is available in SW 68th and SW 69th . We are proposing to use the existing system in SW 69th N:\CLER\Working105-02\4287.1 Impact Statement.doc Noise Impacts No negative noise impacts will result from this project. Noise generated would be typical of a small commercial site. Parks System There are no parks in the general vicinity of this development. The nearest park is the Southwood Park located in Lake Oswego approximately one mile east. N:\CLER\Working\05-02\4287.1 Impact 5tatement.doc 41' CITY OF TIOARD Community Devefopment ShapingA Better Community LAND SE PROPOSAL DESCRIPTION 120 DAYS = 9/28/2002 FILE NO.: SITE DEVELOPMENT REVIEW (SDR) 2002-00006 Type II Land Use Application FILE TITLE: JT ROTH OFFICE BUILDING APPLICANT: JT Roth Construction, Inc. OWNER: JT Roth Construction, Inc. 12600 SW 72nd Avenue, Suite 200 12600 SW 72nd Avenue, Suite 200 Portland, OR 97223 Tigard, OR 97223 OWNER: City of Tigard 13125 SW Hall Boulevard Tigard, OR 97223 REQUEST: The applicant is requesting Site Development Review approval for the construction of a two-story, 7,634 square foot office building in the Tigard Triangle. The property is 17,866 square feet in size. LOCATION: The property is located on the corner of SW 68th Avenue and SW Beveland Street. WCTM 2S101AA, Tax Lots 8300, 8500, 8600 and 8700. ZONE: MUE: Mixed-Use Employment. The MUE zoning district is designed to apply to a majority of the land within the Tigard Triangle, a regional mixed-use employment district bounded by Pacific Highway (Hwy. 99), Highway 217 and 1-5. This zoning district permits a wide range of uses including major retail goods and services, business/professional offices, civic uses and housing; the latter includes multi-family housing at a maximum density of 25 units/acre, equivalent to the R-25 zoning district. APPLICABLE REVIEW Community Development Code Chapters 18.360, 18.390, 18.520, 18.620, 18.705, CRITERIA: 18.725, 18.745, 18.755, 18.765, 18.780, 18.790, 18.795 and 18.810. CIT AREA: East CIT FACILITATOR: List Available Upon Request DECISION MAKING BODY BELOW: ❑ TYPE I ® TYPE II ❑ TYPE III ❑ TYPE IV DATE COMMENTS WERE SENT: JUNE 12, 2002 DATE COMMENTS ARE DUE: JUNE 26, 2002 fl HEARINGS OFFICER (MON.) DATE OF HEARING: TIME: 7:00 PM PIPLANNING COMMISSION (MON.) DATE OF HEARING: TIME: 7:00 PM ❑CITY COUNCIL (TUES.) DATE OF HEARING: TIME: 7:30 PM ®STAFF DECISION (TENTATIVE) DATE OF DECISION: JULY 19, 2002 COMPONENTS RELATED TO THE PROJECT AVAILABLE FOR VIEWING IN THE PLANNING DIVISION Z VICINITY MAP ® LANDSCAPING PLAN Z IMPACT STUDY Z SITE PLAN ® SITE ELEVATIONS Z TRAFFIC IMPACT STUDY ® NARRATIVE ❑ ENVIRONMENTAL REPORT ® OTHER: MISCELLANEOUS STAFF CONTACT: Brad Kilby, Associate Planner (503) 639-4171, Ext. 2434 April 17, 2002 f� J.T. Roth Construction, Inc. CITY OF TIGARD Attn: Tim Roth 12600 SW 72nd Avenue, #200 OREGON Tigard, OR 97223 RE: SDR2002-00006 Letter of Incompleteness Dear Mr. Roth: The City of Tigard received your application submittal for Site Development Review on April 10, 2002. The development site is located at 2S101AA, tax lots 8300,8500,8600, and 8700. This letter is to inform you that additional materials will be needed in order to deem your application complete. The necessary materials are as follows: 1. Include an impact study as required in TDC Section 18.390.040(B)(2)(e). The impact study shall quantify the effect of the development on public facilities and services. The study shall address, at a minimum, the transportation system, including bikeways, the drainage system, the parks system, the water system, the sewer system, and the noise impacts of the development. (example enclosed) 2. A vicinity map 3. Deeds, titles, or proof of ownership for the properties that are affected by this proposal with the exception of tax lot 8600. 4. A construction cost estimate to determine the correct fee structure. 5. A revised site plan to scale that includes the parking lot dimensions, and visual clearance areas. 6. A Lighting plan. 7. A traffic impact report. 8. A revised public facilities plan showing existing or proposed fire hydrants, proposed meter size and location, and proposed fire protection system. 9. Preliminary sizing calculations for the water quality and detention facilities, and verification that the facilities are sized to meet the calculations. For the purposes of completeness review, please submit only 3 copies of the revised materials. If the submitted materials are adequate, I will contact you promptly and ask you to submit the remaining number of copies needed. If you have any questions, please contact me at (503) 639-4171, x388. Sin ely, ,g1-taz,1/- Brad Kilby Associate Planner cc: Land Use Casefile No. SDR2002-00006 13125 SW Hall Blvd., Tigard, OR 97223 (503)639-4171 TDD (503)684-2772 PLANNER'.. APPLICATION COMPLETEI.cSS GUIDE PRIOR TO FORWARDING FOR SET-UP • Tidemark Project Data Entry (within 5 days of receipt) • Completeness/Incompleteness Letter (within 30 days of receipt) • When A Project Is Accepted As Complete And Forwarded To The Planning Secretary For File Set-Up, Please Verify That The Following Items Are Included: Land Use Proposal Description: (verif with check mark the materials submitted) 6a' File Number(s) af Project Name 120 Days (Count the day accepted as day one) Applicant(s) Name and Address Owner(s) Name and Address ca Any Additional Parties to the Application you Want to Receive Notice (Rep./Attorney, Engineer/Consultant, etc.) Description of the Proposed Project(s) Lie? Map(s) and Tax Lot(s) and their Corresponding Addresses "Applicable Review Criteria ti CIT Area—not "Citywide" unless application is for a CPA or LOA (CIT area can be found in Permit* Plan-Parcel information) "Date of Public Hearing or Projected Date to Issue the Decision (Planner to set date/confirm with Hearings Officer/Planning Commission/City Council, if applicable) Request For Staff/Agency Comments Notification Sheet: ❑ Applicable (complete a check-off sheet to include agencies/staff you want to receive a notice) ❑ N/A DLCD Notice (CPA'sIZOA's): ❑ Applicable (complete Notice of"Proposed Amendment" NOW! Complete Notice of"Adoption" or"Withdrawal", as applicable) a N/A Application Materials: (NOTE: this is a generic list only) fa/ Signed Land Use Application ❑ Copy of Warranty or Deed to Verify Ownership Written Property Owner Authorization From ALL OWNERS if Applicant is NOT the Owner CLIgi 1s Owne s4 P p"Narrative ,g// J,; eo/ ❑ Appropriate Number of Materials for Request for Comments for ALL Hearing Bodies ❑ Plans Folded to Approximately 8.5" x I I" yY"8.5" x 11" Reproducible Site Plan Co Revised Plans Clearly Marked as Revised, Including Revision Dates (applicant is responsible for pulling/replacing/folding plan sheets in all sets of revised plans prior to application acceptance) 9..--LIST IN REPRODUCIBLE MAILING LABEL FORMAT Containing the Names and Addresses of All Property Owners Within 500'. If the Property Owner List is Not City Generated, Certification that the List Reflects All Property Owners Within 500 Feet of the Subject Site(s) is Required From the Agency that Generated the List co.--2 Sets of Self-Addressed (no return address), $0.33 Stamped #I0 Envelopes. If Applicant is Using a Postage Meter, NO DATE is to be Printed on the Envelopes, Only Postage. cit.—Additional Materials Required in Pre-Application Notes Pre-Application Conference Notes And Materials: er Applicable (Pull original from Planning Secretaries lateral file cabinet (bottom file drawer) by the Section Number) ❑ N/A is\curpin\masters\application completeness checklist 25-Aug-99 Project: % Rr'vcT� �tj.■0 AHD USE APPLIC `.ION Date: yin(0a COMPLETENESS REVIEW i COMPLETE XINCOMPLETE STANDARD INFORMATION: Deed/Title/Proof Of Ownershi f lei hborhood Mtg.Affidavits, Minutes, List Of Attendees Ins c USA Service rovlder Letter Construction Cost Estimate !JD ❑ # Sets Of Application Materials/Plans Pre-Application Conference Notes Envelopes With Postage (Verify Count) PR9JECT STATISTICS: Er Building Footprint Size M7. %Of Landscaping On Site 127 %Of Building Impervious Surface On Site V. Lot Square Footage PLANS DIMENSIONED: Er Building Footprint Parking Space Dimensions(Include Accessible 8 Bike Parkin ❑ Truck Loading Space Where A licable Building Height ❑ Access Approa n is e Visual Clearance Triangle Shown ADDITIONAL PLANS: Vicinity a N Qr Architectural Plan ❑ Tree Inventory 11/43/f4 Existing Conditions Plan [�Landscape Plan ge Site Plan - Nor To Sr-c,(e ❑ Lighting Plan TREE PLAN/MITIGATION PLAN: Gce,IJeP d2 ❑ ❑ ❑ ❑ ADDITIONAL REPORTS: (list any special reports) ❑ ❑ ❑ ❑ ❑ - ❑ RESPONSE TO APPLICABLE CODE SECTIONS: [11 18.330(Conditional Use) Z 1 8.620(Tigard Triangle Design Standards) 1 8.765(Of-Street Parking/loading Requirements) ❑ 18.340(Directors Interpretation) ❑ 18.630(Washington Square Regional Center) ❑ 18.775(Sensitive Lands Review) CI 18.'3'50(Planned Development) gr 18.705(Access/Egress/Grculation) 10 18.780(Signs) 18.360(Site Development Review) ❑ 18.110(Accessory Residential Units) ❑ 18.785(Temporary Use Permits) ❑ 18.370(Yariances/Adjustmenu) ❑ 18.715(Density Computations) [2' 18.190(Tree Removal) ❑ 18.380(Zoning Map/Text Amendments) ❑ "1 8.720(Design Compatibility Standards) 18.195 Visual clearance Areas) ❑ 1 8.385(Miscellaneous Permits) V 18.725(Environmental Performance Standards) ❑ 18.797(Water Resources(WR)Overlay District) 18.390(Decision Making Procedures/knpact Study) ❑ 18.130(Exceptions To Development Standards) ❑,�_,/18.198(Wireless Communication facilities) El 18.410(tot line Adjustments) ❑ 18.140(Historic Overlay) 15? 18.810(Street&Utility Improvement Standards) ❑ 18.420(land Partitions) ❑�y^18.742(Home Occupation Permits) ltd ❑ 18.430(Subdivisions) 18.145(Landscaping A Screening Standards) ❑ 18.510(Residential Ioning Districts) ❑ 18.750(Manufactured/Mobil Home Regulations) 18.520(Commercial Ioning Districts) €1718.755(Mixed Solid Waste/Recycling Storage) ❑ 1 8.530(Industrial Zoning Districts) ❑ 18.760(Nonconforming Situations) ADDITIONAL ITEMS: I:\curpin\masters\revisedlland use application completeness review.dot REVISED: 17-Jan-01 PUBLIC FACILITY PLAN Project: JT Roth Building COMPLETENESS CHECKLIST Date: April 16, 2002 GRADING ® Existing and proposed contours shown. ® Does proposed grading impact adjacent parcels? ❑ Yes ® No ® Adjacent parcel grades shown. STREET ISSUES ® Right-of-way clearly shown. ® . Centerline of street(s) clearly shown. Streets are fully improved. ® Street name(s) shown. ® , Existing/proposed curb or edge of pavement shown. ❑ Street profiles shown. n/a ❑ Future Street Plan: Must show street profiles, topo n/a on adjacent parcel(s), etc. 0 . Traffic Impact Report N su mrtted. ® Street grades compliant? ® Street widths dimensioned and appropriate? ❑ Private Streets? Less than 6 lots and width n/a appropriate? ❑ Other: SANITARY SEWER ISSUES ® Existing/proposed lines shown. ® Stubs to adjacent parcels required/shown? n/a WATER ISSUES ❑ Existing/proposed lines w/ sizes noted?Ll' Existing/proposed fire hydrants shown? /not shown Proposed meter location and size shown? -lateral shown, but no meter size. Proposed fire protection system shown? Not shown. STORM DRAINAGE AND WATER QUALITY ISSUES 6-u 31L ® Existing/proposed lines shown? ❑ Preliminary sizing calcs for water quality/detention ots i provided? - ® Water quality/detention facility shown on plans? Area for facility match requirements from calcs? )feecl'to verify wit icula io" Facility shown outside any wetland buffer? J ❑ Storm stubs to adjacent parcels required/shown? n/a The submittal is hereb deemed )1 :(COMPLETE ® INCOMPLETE By: _. . - Date: April 16,-2OOZ 41110 . REVISED: 04/16/02 c_1(... 2.Z 102___ May 31, 2002 J.T. Roth Construction, Inc. CITY OF TIGD Attn: Tim Roth 12600 SW 72nd Avenue, #200 OREGON Tigard, OR 97223 RE: SDR2002-00006 Letter of Completeness Dear Mr. Roth: The City of Tigard received your application submittal for Site Development Review on April 10, 2002, and the additional items that were requested on May 22, 2002. The development site is located at 2S101AA, tax lots 8300,8500,8600, and 8700. This letter is to inform you that your application has been deemed complete, and has been scheduled for review. Please submit 16 additional copies of all of the materials for routing within the next week. A tentative decision on this application should be issued in 6-8 weeks. If you have any questions, please contact me at (503) 639-4171, x388. Sincerely, Brad Kilby Associate Planner cc: Land Use Casefile No. SDR2002-00006 13125 SW Hall Blvd., Tigard, OR 97223 (503)639-4171 TDD (503)684-2772 �`OC G t;�'I clog'(` „ r _. Letter of Transmittal To: Brad Kilby Project: 8700 Building SDR2002-00006 Date: 6-7-02 Company: City of Tigard Phone: 503/639-4171 Fax: _503/ We are sending you: shop drawings correspondence specs invoices proposals copy of letter change order plans contract other ****************************************************************************** Copies Date Ref# Description ****************************************************************************** 16 Site Development Review Application Application Narrative Property Deed Clean Water Services Provider letter Impact Statement letter Plans *site plan *landscape plan *utility plan *prelim floor plan *prelim elevations 5 May 14, 2002 SDR 2002-00006 Detention and Water Quality Calculations 5 May 21, 2002 Traffic Report The above is the additional copies that you requested per your letter dated May 31, 2002 and our conversation June 4, 2002. Let me know if there is anything else needed. 7S' rel ' y -r 'ot''r. RECEIVED J.T. RI h Construction, Inc. CITY OF TIGARD PLANNING/ENGINEERING — 12600 S.W. 72nd Ave.,Suite 200,Tigard, Oregon 97223 503/639-2639 FAX 503/624-0239 CCB#0031700 — \ �G RECEIVED PLANNING � yl ° `' MAY 2 2 2002 CITY OF TIGARD Letter of Transmittal To: Brad Kilby Project: 8700 Building SDR2002-00006 Date: 5-21-02 Company: City of Tigard Phone: 503/639-4171 Fax: _503/ We are sending you: shop drawings correspondence specs invoices proposals copy of letter change order plans contract other ****************************************************************************** Copies Date Ref# Description ****************************************************************************** 3 Impact Statement (Triangle View Place) 3 4-12-02 8700 Building Vicinity Map (see site plan) 3 7-17-98 851692 Warranty Deed(Conveyance to J.T. Roth,Jr. and Theresa Roth) 3 8700 Building Construction Estimate 3 4-12-02 8700 Building Revised site plan 3 4-12-02 8700 Building Lighting plan (see site plan) 3 5-12-02 Lancaster Engineering Traffic Impact Report 3 4-12-02 8700 Building Revised Public Facilities Plan (see site plan) 3 5-14-02 Triangle View Place Prelim. Water Quality Calc's I trust that this will complete the information necessary for the application submittal for Site Development Review. Please let me know if there is anything else required Ali 1 or — 1. '9 ,Jr. J.T. Roth Construction, Inc. — 12600 S.W. 72nd Ave.,Suite 200,Tigard, Oregon 97223 503/639-2639 FAX 503/624-0239 CCB#0031700 — saloN DNEflI4MOD lNiOI ,I,VDI'IddV ilild CITY OF TIGARDA ' A? ICATION CON-FE REM NOTES s PreAlplitatinti:Meeting Notes are Valid for Six (6) Months) NON-RESIDENTIAL MG M ET• . sue : APPLICANT: T -T ry) NTH AGENT: Phone:( ) ( t 6,3ci Phone: ( ) PROPERTY LOCATION: ADDRESS/GENERAL LOCATION: ieve.tarIh C0%+4' TAX MAP(S)/LOT #(S): S 161 RR TL_ ACO,(2730f 8S051 aftr\ W.40 NECESSARY APPLICATIONS: SUK PROPOSAL DESCRIPTION: COns rc„rA C; r-t, 0 c i. Quit OW;ce El c)c�, in -111F -r; czrcy —(k',p NCB[' COMPREHENSIVE PLAN I`ll MAP DESIGNATION: Esc ln� ,.e.r,-Ir ZONING MAP DESIGNATION: (-11( -E, CITIZEN INVOLVEMENT TEAM (C.I.T.)AREA: Eras-r ZONING DISTRICT DIMENSIONAL REQUIREMENTS (Refer to Code Section 18. S a 0 ) Ffi K 0.4 MINIMUM LOT SIZE: sq. ft. Average Min. lot width: SO ft. Max. building height: 9 ft. Setbacks: Front " ft. Side OiX ft. Rear 0-ft. Corner -- ft. from street. MAXIMUM SITE COVERAGE: $5 % Minimum landscaped or natural vegetation area: I %. (NEIGHBORHOOD MEETING (Refer to the Neighborhood Meeting Handout] THE APPLICANT SHALL NOTIFY ALL PROPERTY OWNERS WITHIN 500 FEET, THE MEMBERS OF ANY LAND USE SUBCOMMITTEE(S), AND THE CITY OF TIGARD PLANNING DIVISION of their proposal. A minimum of two (2) weeks between the mailing date and the meeting date is required. Please review the Land Use Notification handout concerning site posting and the meeting notice. Meeting is to be held prior to submitting your application or the application will not be accepted. NOTE: In order to also preliminarily address building code standards, a meeting with a Plans Examiner is encouraged prior to submittal of a land use application. CITY OF TIGARD Pre-Application Conference Notes Page 1 of 9 NON Residential Application/Planning Division Section NARRATIVE (Refer to Code Chapter 18.390) The APPLICANT SHALL SUBMIT A NARRATIVE which provides findings based on the applicable approval standards. Failure to provide a narrative or adequately address criteria would be reason to consider an application incomplete and delay review of the proposal. The applicant should review the code for applicable criteria. I IMPACT STUDY [Refer to Code Sections 18.390.040 and 18.390.050] As a part of the APPLICATION SUBMITTAL REQUIREMENTS, applicants are required to INCLUDE IMPACT STUDY with their submittal package. The impact study shall quantify the effect of the development on public facilities and services. The study shall address, at a minimum, the transportation system, including bikeways, the drainage system, the parks system, the water system, the sewer system and the noise impacts of the development. For each public facility system and type of impact, the study shall propose improvements necessary to meet City standards, and to minimize the impact of the development on the public at large, public facilities systems, and affected private property users. In situations where the Community Development Code requires the dedication of real property interests, the applicant shall either specifically concur with the dedication requirement, or provide evidence which supports the conclusion that the real property dedication requirement is not roughly proportional to the projected impacts of the development. El ACCESS [Refer to Chapters 18.705 and 18.165] Minimum number of accesses: ' Minimum access width: - Minimum pavement width: All driveways and parking areas, except for some fleet storage parking areas, must be paved. Drive-in use queuing areas: R IA WALKWAY REQUIREMENTS [Refer to Code Section 18.705.0301 WALKWAYS SHALL EXTEND FROM THE GROUND FLOOR ENTRANCES OR FROM THE GROUND FLOOR LANDING OF STAIRS, ramps, or elevators of all commercial, institutional, and industrial uses, to the streets which provide the required access and egress. Walkways shall provide convenient connections between buildings in multi-building commercial, institutional, and industrial complexes. Unless impractical, walkways should be constructed between a new development and neighboring developments. O SPECIAL SETBACKS [Refer to Code Chapter 18.7301 D STREETS: feet from the centerline of 3 Lk) VP • LOWER INTENSITY ZONES: feet, along the site's boundary. D FLAG LOT: 10-FOOT SIDE YARD SETBACK. I I SPECIAL BUILDING HEIGHT PROVISIONS [Refer to Code Section 18.730.0101J BUILDING HEIGHT EXCEPTIONS - Buildings located in a non-residential zone may be built to a height of 75 feet provided at: > A maximum building flo r area to site area ratio (FAR) of 1.5 to 1 will exist; > All actual building setba s will be at least half(1/2) of the building's height; and > The structure will not abu a residential zoned district. ❑ BUFFERING AND SCREENING [Refs th Code Chapter 18.1451 In order TO INCREASE PRIVA Y AND TO EITHER REDUCE OR ELIMINATE ADVERSE NOISE OR VISUAL IMPACTS between a .acent developments, especially between different land uses, the City requires landscaped buffer ar s along certain site perimeters. Required buffer areas are described by the Code in terms of wi . Buffer areas must be occupied by a mixture of deciduous and evergreen trees and shrubs and mast also achieve a balance between vertical and horizontal plantings. Site obscuring screens or fenc may also be required; these are often advisable even if not required by the Code. The required bu er areas may only be occupied by vegetation, fences, utilities, and walkways. Additional informatio on required buffer area materials and sizes may be found in the Development Code. CITY OF TIGARD Pre-Application Conference Notes Page 2 of 9 NON-Residential Application/Planning Division Section The ESTIMATED REQUIRED BUFFER WIDTHS applicable to your proposal area are: feet along north boundary. feet along east boundary. feet along south boundary. feet along west boundary. IN ADDITION, SIGHT OBSCURING SCREENING IS REQUIRED ALONG: PAP.rirc flQEac . [LANDSCAPING [Refer to Code Chapters 18.145,18.765 and 18.7051 STREET TREES ARE REQUIRED FOR ALL DEVELOPMENTS FRONTING ON A PUBLIC OR PRIVATE STREET as well as driveways which are more than 100 feet in length. Street trees must be placed either within the public right-of-way or on private property within six (6) feet of the right-of- way boundary. Street trees must have a minimum caliper of at least two (2) inches when measured four (4) feet above grade. Street trees should be spaced 20 to 40 feet apart depending on the branching width of the proposed tree species at maturity. Further information on regulations affecting street trees may be obtained from the Planning Division. A MINIMUM OF ONE (1) TREE FOR EVERY SEVEN (7) PARKING SPACES MUST BE PLANTED in and around all parking areas in order to provide a vegetative canopy effect. Landscaped parking areas shall include special design features which effectively screen the parking lot areas from view. These design features may include the use of landscaped berms, decorative walls, and raised planters. For detailed information on design requirements for parking areas and accesses. RECYCLING [Refer to Code Chapter 18.1551 Applicant should CONTACT FRANCHISE HAULER FOR REVIEW AND APPROVAL OF SITE SERVICING COMPATIBILITY. Locating a trash/recycling enclosure within a clear vision area such as at the intersection of two (2) driveways within a parking lot is prohibited. Much of Tigard is within Pride Disposal's Service area. Lenny Hing is the contact person and can be reached at (503) 625-6177. ["PARKING (Refer to Code Section 18.765.0401 26'3 E REQUIRED parking for this type of use: �S (`I) t'∎LurC\e Parking SHOWN on preliminary plan(s): �S `i .Shn�•� SECONDARY USE REQUIRED parking: Parking SHOWN on preliminary plan(s): NO MORE THAN 50% OF REQUIRED SPACES MAY BE DESIGNATED AND/OR DIMENSIONED AS COMPACT SPACES. PARKING STALLS shall be dimensioned as follows: • Standard parking space dimensions: 8 feet, 6 inches x 18 feet, 6 inches. • Compact parking space dimensions: 7 feet, 6 inches x 16 feet, 6 inches. Note: Parking space width includes the width of a stripe that separates the parking space from an adjoining space. Note: A maximum of three (3) feet of the vehicle overhang area in front of a wheel stop or curb can be included as part of required parking space depth. This area cannot be included as landscaping for meeting the minimum percentage requirements. HANDICAPPED PARKING: • All parking areas shall PROVIDE APPROPRIATELY LOCATED AND DIMENSIONED DISABLED PERSON PARKING spaces. The minimum number of disabled person parking spaces to be provided, as well as the parking stall dimensions, are mandated by the Americans with Disabilities Act (ADA). A handout is available upon request. A handicapped parking space symbol shall be painted on the parking space surface and an appropriate sign shall be °slted„ BICYCLE RACKS ARE REQUIRED FOR MULTI-FAMILY, COMMERCIAL AND INDUSTRIAL DEVELOPMENTS. Bicycle racks shall be located in areas protected from automobile traffic and in convenient locations. ❑ LOADING AREA REQUIREMENTS (Refer to Code Section 18.765.0801 Every COMMERCIAL OR INDUSTRIAL BUILDING IN EXCESS OF 10,000 SQUARE FEET shall be provided with a loading space. \The space size and location shall be as approved by the City Engineer. CITY OF TIGARD Pre-Application Conference Notes Page 3 of 9 NON-Residential Application/Planning Division Section ,A BICYCLE RACKS (Refer to Code Section 18.7651 BICYCLE RACKS are required FOR MULTI-FAMILY, COMMERCIAL AND INDUSTRIAL DEVELOPMENTS. Bicycle racks shall be located in areas protected from automobile traffic and in convenient locations. ❑ SENSITIVE LANDS (Refer to Code Chapter 18.775) The Code provides REGULATIONS FOR LANDS WHICH ARE POTENTIALLY UNSUITABLE FOR DEVELOPMENT DUE TO AREAS WITHIN THE 100-YEAR FLOODPLAIN, NATURAL DRAINAGEWAYS, WETLAND AREAS, ON SLOPES IN EXCESS OF 25 PERCENT, OR ON UNSTABLE GROUND. Staff will attempt to preliminary identify sensitive lands areas at the pre- application conference based on available information. HOWEVER, the responsibility to precisely identify sensitive land areas, and their boundaries, is the responsibility of the applicant. Areas meeting the definitions of sensitive lands must be clearly indicated on plans submitted with the development applicatipn. Chapter 18.775 also provides regulations for the use, protection, or modification of sensitive lands areas. RESIDENTIAL DEVELOPMENT IS PROHIBITED WITHIN FLOODPLAINS. ❑ STEEP SLOPES (Refer to Code Section 18.775.080.C1 When STEEP SLOPES exist, prior to issuance of a final order, a geotechnical report must be submitted which ddresses the approval standards of the Tigard Community Development Code Section 18.775.08 .C . The report shall be based upon field exploration and investigation and shall include specific recommendations for achieving the requirements of Section 18.775.080.C. ❑ CLEANWATER SERVICES(CWS)BUFFER STANDARDS (Refer to R a 0 96-44/USA Regulations-Chapter 3) LAND DEVELOPMENT ADJACENT TO SENSITIVE AREAS shall preserve and maintain or create a vegetated cor 'dor for a buffer wide enough to protect the water quality functioning of the sensitive area. Design Criteria: The VEGETATED CORRIDOR WIDTH is dependent on the sensitive area. The following table identifies the require widths: TABLE 3.1 VEGETATED CORRIDOR WIDTHS SOURCE: CWS DESIGN AND CONSTRUCTION STANDARDS MANUAL/RESOLUTION & ORDER 96-44 SENSITIVE AREA DEFINITION Si = :� 4 4444, � - • ♦ Streams with intermittent flow draining: <25% 10 to <50 acres 15 feet • >50 to <100 acres 25 feet ♦ Existing or created wetlands <0.5 acre 25 feet • Existing or created wetlands >0.5 acre <25% 50 feet • Rivers, streams, and springs with year-round flow • Streams with intermittent flow draining >100 acres • Natural lakes and ponds • Streams with intermittent flow draining: >25% 10 to <50 acres 30 feet >50 to <100 acres 50 feet • Existing or created wetlands >25% Variable from 50-200 feet. Measure • Rivers, streams, and springs with year-round flow in 25-foot increments from the starting • Streams with intermittent flow draining >100 acres point to the top of ravine(break in • Natural lakes and ponds <25%slope), add 35 feet past the top of ravine6 4Starting point for measurement = edge of the defined channel (bankful flow) for streams/rivers, delineated wetland boundary, delineated spring boundary, and/or average high water for lakes or ponds, whichever offers greatest resource protection. Intermittent springs, located a minimum of 15 feet within the river/stream or wetland vegetated corridor,shall not serve as a starting point for measurement. 5Vegetated corridor averaging or reduction is allowed only when the vegetated corridor is certified to be in a marginal or degraded condition. 6The vegetated corridor extends 35 feet from the top of the ravine and sets the outer boundary of the vegetated corridor. The 35 feet may be reduced to 15 feet,if a stamped geotechnical report confirms slope stability shall be maintained with the reduced setback from the top of ravine. CITY OF TIGARD Pre-Application Conference Notes Page 4 of 9 NON-Residential Application/Planning Division Section • Restrictions in the Vegetate Corridor: NO structures, development, construction activities, gardens, lawns, application of chemicals, dumping of any materials of any kind, or other activities shall be permitted which otherwise detract from the water quality protection provided by the vegetated corridor, except as provided for in the CWS Design and Construction Standards. Location of Vegetated Corridor: IN ANY RESIDENTIAL DEVELOPMENT WHICH CREATES MULTIPLE PARCELS or lots intended for separate ownership, such as a subdivision, the vegetated corridor shall be contained in a separate tract, and shall not be a part of any parcel to be used for the construction of a dwelling unit. CWS Service Provider Letter: PRIOR TO SUBMITTAL of any land use applications, the applicant must obtain a CWS Service Provider Letter which will outline the conditions necessary to comply with the R&O 96-44 sensitive area requirements. If there are no sensitive areas, CWS must still issue a letter stating a CWS Service Provider Letter is not required. ,1 SIGNS [Refer to Code Chapter 18.7801 SIGN PERMITS MUST BE OBTAINED PRIOR TO INSTALLATION OF ANY SIGN in the City of Tigard. A "Guidelines for Sign Permits" handout is available upon request. Additional sign area or height beyond Code standards may be permitted if the sign proposal is reviewed as part of a development review application. Alternatively, a Sign Code Exception application may be filed for Director's review. [TREE REMOVAL PLAN REQUIREMENTS [Refer to Code Section 18.790.030.CJ A TREE PLAN FOR THE PLANTING, REMOVAL AND PROTECTION OF TREES prepared by a certified arborist shall be provided for any lot, parcel or combination of lots or parcels for which a development application for a subdivision, partition, site development review, planned development, or conditional use is filed. Protection is preferred over removal where possible. THE TREE PLAN SHALL INCLUDE the following: ➢ Identification of the location, size and species of all existing trees including trees designated as significant by the City; ➢ Identification of a program to save existing trees or mitigate tree removal over 12 inches in caliper. Mitigation must follow the replacement guidelines of Section 18.790.060.D according to the following standards and shall be exclusive of trees required by other development code provisions for landscaping, streets and parking lots: Retainage of less than 25% of existing trees over 12 inches in caliper requires a mitigation program according to Section 18.150.070.D. of no net loss of trees; Retainage of from 25 to 50% of existing trees over 12 inches in caliper requires that two- thirds of the trees to be removed be mitigated according to Section 18.790.060.D.; Retainage of from 50 to 75% of existing trees over 12 inches in caliper requires that 50% of the trees to be removed be mitigated according to Section 18.790.060.D.; 1 Retainage of 75% or greater of existing trees over 12 inches in caliper requires no mitigation; ➢ Identification of all trees which are proposed to be removed; and ➢ A protection program defining standards and methods that will be used by the applicant to protect trees during and after construction. TREES REMOVED WITHIN THE PERIOD OF ONE (1) YEAR PRIOR TO A DEVELOPMENT APPLICATION LISTED ABOVE will be inventoried as part of the tree plan above and will be replaced according to Section 18.790.060.D. (M MITIGATION [Refer to Code Section 18.790.060.11 REPLACEMENT OF A TREE shall take place according to the following guidelines: ➢ A replacement tree shall be a substantially similar species considering site characteristics. ➢ If a replacement tree of the species of the tree removed or damages is not reasonably available, the Director may allow replacement with a different species of equivalent natural resource value. CITY OF TIGARD Pre-Application Conference Notes Page 5 of 9 NON-Residential Application/Planning Division Section ➢ If a replacement tree of the size cut is not reasonably available on the local market or would not be viable, the Director shall require replacement with more than one tree in accordance with the following formula: The number of replacement trees required shall be determined by dividing the estimated caliper size of the tree removed or damaged, by the caliper size of the largest reasonably available replacement trees. If this number of trees cannot be viably located on the subject property, the Director may require one (1) or more replacement trees to be planted on other property within the city, either public property or, with the consent of the owner, private property. • The planting of a replacement tree shall take place in a manner reasonably calculated to allow growth to maturity. IN LIEU OF TREE REPLACEMENT under Subsection D of this section, a party may, with the consent of the Director, elect to compensate the City for its costs in performing such tree replacement. I CLEAR VISION AREA [Refer to Code Chapter 18.7951 The City requires that CLEAR VISION AREAS BE MAINTAINED BETWEEN THREE (3) AND EIGHT (8) FEET IN HEIGHT at road/driveway, road/railroad, and road/road intersections. The size of the required clear vision area depends upon the abutting street's functional classification and any existing obstructions within the clear vision area. n WATER RESOURCES OVERLAY DISTRICT [Refer to Code Section 18.791.0301 The WATER RESOURCES (WR) OVERLAY DISTRICT implements the policies of the Tigard Comprehensive Plan and is intended to resolve conflicts between development and conservation of significant wetlands, streams and riparian corridors identified in the City of Tigard Local Wetlands Inventory. Specifically, this chapter allows reasonable economic use of property while establishing clear and objective standards to: protect significant wetlands and streams; limit development in designated riparian corridors; maintain and enhance water quality; maximize flood storage capacity; preserve native plant cover; minimize streambank erosion; maintain and enhance fish and wildlife habitats; and conserve scenic, recreational and educational values of water resource areas. • Safe Harbor: The WR OVERLAY DISTRICT ALSO MEET HE REQUIREMENTS OF STATEWIDE PLANNING GOAL 5 (Natural Resources) and the "safe door" provisions of the Goal 5 administrative rule (OAR 660, Division 23). These provisions requi e that "significant" wetlands and riparian corridors be mapped and protected. The Tualatin River, which is also a "fish-bearing stream," has an average annual flow of more than 1000 cfs. Major Streams: Streams which are mapped as "FISH-BEARING STREAMS" by the Oregon Department of Forestry and have an average annual flow less than 1000 cubic feet per second (cfs). ➢ Major streams in Tigard include FANNO CREEK, ASH CREEK (EXCEPT THE NORTH FORK AND OTHER TRIBUTARY CREEKS) AND BALL CREEK. Minor Streams: Streams which are NOT "FISH-BEARING STREAMS" according to Oregon Department of Forestry maps . Minor streams in Tigard include Summer Creek, Deny Dell Creek, Red Rock Creek, North Fork of Ash Creek and certain short tributaries of the Tualatin River. Riparian Setback Area-/ This AREA IS MEA, JRED HORIZONTALLY FROM AND PARALLEL TO MAJOR STREAM OR TUALATIN RIVER OP-OF-BANKS, OR THE EDGE OF AN ASSOCIATED WETLAND, whichever is greater. The riparian setback is the same as the "riparian corridor boundary" in OAR 660-23- 090(1)(d). CITY OF TIGARD Pre-Application Conference Notes Page 6 of 9 NON-Residential Application/Planning Division Section • ➢ The standard TUALATIN RIVER RIPARIAN SETBACK IS 75 FEET, unless modified in accordance with this chapter. ➢ The MAJOR STREAMS RIPARIAN SETBACK IS 50 FEET, unless modified in accordance with this chapter. ➢ ISOLATED WETLANDS AND MINOR STREAMS (including adjacent wetlands) have no riparian setback; however, a 25-foot "water quality buffer" is required under Cleanwater Services (CWS) standards adopted and administered by the City of Tigard. n RIPARIAN SETBACK REDUCTIONS (Refer to Code Section 18.797.1001 The DIRECTOR MAY APPROVE A SIT PECIFIC REDUCTION OF THE TUALATIN RIVER OR ANY MAJOR STREAM RIPARIAN SE ACK BY AS MUCH AS 50% to allow the placement of structures or impervious surfaces othe ise prohibited by this chapter, provided that equal or better protection for identified major strew resources is ensured through streambank restoration and/or enhancement of riparian vegetation • preserved portions of the riparian setback area. Eligibility for Riparian Setback in , isturbed Areas. TO BE ELIGIBLE FOR A RIPARIAN SETBACK REDUCTION, the applicant must demonstrate that the riparian corridor was substantially disturbed at the time this regulation was adopted. This determination must be based on the Vegetation Study required by Section 18.797.100 that demonstrates all of the following: Native plant species currently cover less than 80% of the on-site riparian corridor area; ➢ The tree canopy currently covers less than 50% of the on-site riparian corridor and healthy trees have not been removed from the on-site riparian setback area for the last five years; That vegetation was not removed contrary to the provisions of Section 18.797.100 regulating removal of native plant species; That there will be no infringement into the 100-year floodplain; and • The average slope of the riparian area is not greater than 20%. n ADDITIONAL LOT DIMENSIONAL REQUIREMENTS JReferto Code Section 18.810.060) MINIMUM LOT FRONTAGE: 25 feet,rinless lot is created through the minor land partition process. Lots created as part of a partition must have a minimum of 15 feet of frontage or have a minimum 15-foot wide access easement. The DEPTH OF ALL LOTS SHALL NOT EXCEED 21/2 TIMES THE AVERAGE WIDTH, unless the parcel is less than 11/2 times the minimum lot size of the applicable zoning district. CODE CHAPTERS - 18.330(Conditional Use) /18.620(Tigard Triangle Design Standards) 18.765(Off-Street Parking/Loading Requirements) 18.340(Directors Interpretation) 18.630(Washington Square Regional Center) 18.775(Sensitive Lands Review) 18.350(Planned Development) 18.705(Access/Egress/Circulation) Z1 8.780(Signs) 18.360(Site Development Review) 18.710(Accessory Residential Units) _ 18.785(Temporary Use Permits) 18.370(Variances/Adjustments) 18.715(Density Computations) 18.790(Tree Removal) - 18.380(Zoning Map/Text Amendments) /' 18.720(Design Compatibility Standards) 18.795(visual Clearance Areas) 18.385(Miscellaneous Permits) ;/' 18.725(Environmental Performance Standards) 18.797(Water Resources(WR)Overlay District) - 18.390(Decision Making Procedures/Impact Study) 18.730(Exceptions To Development Standards) 18.798(Wireless Communication Facilities) - 18.410(Lot Line Adjustments) 18.740(Historic Overlay) ,. 18.810(Street&Utility Improvement Standards) 18.420(Land Partitions) 18.742(Home Occupation Permits) 18.430(Subdivisions) . 18.745(Landscaping&Screening Standards) 18.510(Residential Zoning Districts) 18.750(Manufactured/Mobil Home Regulations) 18.520(Commercial Zoning Districts) V 18.755(Mixed Solid Waste/Recycling Storage) - 18.530(Industrial Zoning Districts) 18.760(Nonconforming Situations) CITY OF TIGARD Pre-Application Conference Notes Page 7 of 9 NON-Residential Application/Planning Division Section ADDITIONAL CONCERNS OR COMMENTS: 6ARn TR'Iau�I� �'�� S4r n).)r,4Ri><, rHRIC tnC km. S-t r(\ i-�t\s n'1t)S4 Jhe Sr,r•e.Pn (6D G. (� iO ( R)6 ) ( ;))(3A5) (CD) P cAr1R VE.c,Pe_r qrr His 4( C$4' cir otnth Cee4. Cub 4a GuD6) -CI( ( tom' 3 Scotland (.',ML (..90 C.tQ+ 3L{ C7ce.4. Cori, 46 Cor_ ) -41 F ki.\*;ne3 TRFF,S ). SOR T 1!c t.oce s fo r rnpleir c5nr . appi;c6-4-1 decreA cryhpit4e. It OF oad The84in9 Pe%unred - �vOJ;r\cs3 t3ITT'IC 61;44-1 ac (nee-4;in Seth cA6;,; LOA V 1 -4E Ser.i'ce 64f'er- PROCEDURE / V Administrative Staff Review. Public hearing before the Land Use Hearings Officer. Public hearing before the Planning Commission. Public hearing before the Planning Commission with the Commission making a recommendation on the proposal to the City Council. An additional public hearing shall be held by the City Council. APPLICATION SUBMITTAL PROCESS All APPLICATIONS MUST BE ACCEPTED BY A PLANNING DIVISION STAFF MEMBER of the Community Development Department at Tigard City Hall offices. PLEASE NOTE: Applications submitted by mail or dropped off at the counter without Planning Division acceptance may be returned. The Planning counter closes at 4:00 PM. Maps submitted with an application shall be folded IN ADVANCE to 8.5 by 11 inches. One (1), 81/21 x 11" map of a proposedproject should be submitted for attachment to the staff report or administrative decision. Application with unfolded maps shall not be accepted. The Planning Division and Engineering Department will perform a preliminary review of the application and will determine whether an application is complete within 30 days of the counter submittal. Staff will notify the applicant if additional information or additional copies of the submitted materials are required. CITY OF TIGARD Pre-Application Conference Notes Page 8 of 9 NON-Residential Application/Planning Division Section The administrative decision or public hearing will typically occur approximately 45 to 60 days after an application is accepted as being complete by the Planning Division. Applications involving difficult or protracted issues or requiring review by other jurisdictions may take additional time to review. Written recommendations from the Planning staff are issued seven (7) days prior to the public hearing. A 10-day public appeal period follows all land use decisions. An appeal on this matter would be heard by the Tigard �Es-, ,,c C c c.en . A basic flow chart which illustrates the review process is available from the Planning Division upon request. Land use applications requiring a public hearing must have notice posted on-site by the applicant no less than 10 days prior to the public hearing. This PRE-APPLICATION CONFERENCE AND THE NOTES OF THE CONFERENCE ARE INTENDED TO INFORM the prospective applicant of the primary Community Development Code requirements applicable to the potential development of a particular site and to allow the City staff and prospective applicant to discuss the opportunities and constraints affecting development of the site. BUILDING PERMITS PLANS FOR BUILDING AND OTHER RELATED PERMITS WILL NOT BE ACCEPTED FOR REVIEW UNTIL A LAND USE APPROVAL HAS BEEN ISSUED. Final inspection approvals by the Building Division will not be granted until there is compliance with all conditions of development approval. These pre-application notes do not include comments from the Building Division. For proposed buildings or modifications to existing buildings, it is recommended to contact a Building Division Plans Examiner to determine if there are building code issues that would prevent the structure from being constructed, as proposed. Additionally, with regard to Subdivisions and Minor Land Partitions where any structure to be demolished has system development charge (SDC) credits and the underlying parcel for that structure will be eliminated when the new plat is recorded, the City's policy is to apply those system development credits to the first building permit issued in the development (UNLESS OTHERWISE DIRECTED BY THE DEVELOPER AT THE TIME IN WHICH THE DEMOLITION PERMIT IS OBTAINED). PLEASE NOTE: The conference and notes cannot cover all Code requirements and aspects related to site planning that should apply to the development of .your site plan. Failure of the staff to provide information required by the Code shall not constitute a waiver of the applicable standards or requirements. It is recommended tha-t a prospective applicant either obtain and read tiie Community Development Code or ask any questions of City staff relative to Code requirements prior to submitting an application. AN ADDITIONAL PRE-APPLICATION FEE AND CONFERENCE WILL BE REQUIRED IF AN APPLICATION PERTAINING TO THIS PRE-APPLICATION CONFERENCE IS SUBMITTED AFTER A PERIOD OF MORE THAN SIX (6) MONTHS FOLLOWING THIS CONFERENCE (unless deemed as unnecessary by the Planning Division). PREPARED BY: &AC) CITY OF TIGARD PLANNING DIVISION - STAFF PERSON HOLDING PRE-APP. MEETING PHONE: (503) 639-4111 FAX: (503) 684-7297 E-MAIL (staffs first name) ci.tigard.or.us TITLE 18(CITY OF TIGARD'S COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT CODE)INTERNET ADDRESS: www.Cl.tigard.Or.US H:1pattylmasters\Pre-App Notes Commercial.doc Updated: 1-Nov-2001 (Engineering section:preapp.eng) CITY OF TIGARD Pre-Application Conference Notes Page 9 of 9 NON-Residential Application/Planning Division Section t � CITY OF TIGARD LAND USE APPLICATION CHECKLIST Please read this form carefully in conjunction with the notes provided to you at the pre- application conference. This checklist identifies what is required for submittal of a complete land use application. Once an application is deemed complete by Community Development staff, a decision may be issued within 6-8 weeks. If you have additional questions after reviewing all of the information provided to you, please contact the staff person named below at the City of Tigard Planning Division, (503) 639-4171. Staff: Rf)U Date: a 7I5/6_ 1. BASIC INFORMATION ALL LAND USE APPLICATIONS REQUIRE THE FOLLOWING: • Completed Application Form with property owner's signature or name of agent and letter of authorization Title transfer instrument or grant deed • Written summary of proposal Narrative demonstrating compliance with all applicable development standards and approval criteria (as specified in the Pre-Application Conference notes) y Two (2) sets of stamped, addressed #10 envelopes for all owners of property within 500 feet of the subject property. Mailing envelopes shall be standard legal-size (#10), addressed with 1" x 4" labels (see envelope submittal requirements). Property owner mailing lists must be prepared by the City for a minimal fee (see request for 500' property owner mailing list form). Documentary evidence of neighborhood meeting (if required) Impact Study per Section 18.390.040.B.2.(e) Copy of the Pre-Application Conference notes Filing Fee 2. PLANS REQUIRED In addition to the above basic information, each type of land use application will require one or more of the following maps or plans. PLEASE SUBMIT EACH OF THE PLANS CHECKED BELOW WITH YOUR APPLICATION (Section 5 of this checklist provides details on what information to include on each plan): I Vicinity Map 0"- Preliminary Grading/Erosion Control Plan L? Existing Conditions Map CY Preliminary Utilities Plan ❑ Subdivision Preliminary Plat Map 0 Preliminary Storm Drainage Plan ❑ Preliminary Partition/Lot Line Adjustment Plan D' Tree Preservation/Mitigation Plan ▪c Site Development Plan D" Architectural Drawings t3 Landscape Plan Q Sign Drawings C:17.-- 1 Public Improvements/Streets Plan 3. NUMBER OF COPIES REQUIRED The City requires multiple copies of submittal materials. The number of copies required depends on the type of review process. FOR AN APPLICATION SUCH AS YOU ARE PROPOSING THE CITY REQUIRES j COPIES OF ALL APPLICATION MATERIALS. City of Tigard Land Use Application Checklist Page 1 of 5 • 4. SPECIAL STUDIES AND REPORTS Because of the nature of your project and/or the site you propose to develop, THE FOLLOWING ADDITIONAL STUDIES WILL BE REQUIRED. These studies must be prepared by certified professionals with experience in the appropriate field: ❑ Local Streets Traffic Study ❑ Wetlands/Stream Corridor Delineation and Report ❑ Habitat Area Evaluation ❑ Geotechnical Report ❑ Geotechnical Report must address liquefaction potential and soil bearing capacity ❑ Other 5. PREPARING PLANS AND MAPS Plans and maps should be prepared at an engineering scale (1" = 10/20/50/100/200') and include a north arrow, legend and date. The same scale should be used for all your plans. Where possible the City prefers the use of a scale that allows a site plan or subdivision plat to be shown on a single sheet. Architectural drawings may be prepared at an architectural scale. One copy of each plan must be submitted in photo-ready 81/2 x 11 format. THE FOLLOWING IS A LIST OF REQUIRED INFORMATION FOR EACH TYPE OF PLAN (If the plans you submit do not include all of the information requested because you feel it is not applicable, please indicate this and provide a brief explanation). Vicinity Map Showing the location of the site in relation to: • Adjacent properties ❑ • Surrounding street system including nearby intersections ❑ • Pedestrian ways and bikeways ❑ • Transit stops ❑ ♦ Utility access ❑ Existing Conditions Map Parcel boundaries, dimensions and gross area ❑ Contour lines (2' intervals for 0-10% slopes or 5'for slopes >10%) ❑ Drainage patterns and courses on the site and on adjacent lands ❑ Potential natural hazard areas including: • Floodplain areas ❑ • Areas having a high seasonal water table within 24" of the surface for three or more weeks of the year ❑ • Slopes in excess of 25% ❑ • Unstable ground ❑ • Areas with severe soil erosion potential ❑ • Areas having severely weak foundation soils ❑ • Locations of resource areas including: • Wildlife habitat areas identified in the Comprehensive Plan ❑ ♦ Wetlands ❑ Other site features: ♦ Rock outcroppings ❑ ♦ Trees with >_ 6"caliper measured 4' from ground level ❑ Location and type of noise sources ❑ Locations of existing structures and their uses ❑ Locations of existing utilities and easements ❑ Locations of existing dedicated right-of-ways ❑ City of Tigard Land Use Application Checklist Page 2 of 5 • Subdivision Preliminary Plat Map The proposed name of the subdivision ❑ Vicinity map showing property's relationship to arterial and collector streets ❑ Names, addresses and telephone numbers of the owner, developer, engineer surveyor and designer(as applicable) ❑ Scale, north arrow and date ❑ Boundary lines of tract to be subdivided Names of adjacent subdivisions or names of recorded owners of adjoining parcels of un-subdivided land ❑ Contour lines related to a City-established benchmark at 2' intervals for 0-10% grades and 5' intervals for grades greater than 10% ❑ The purpose, location, type and size of all of the following (within and adjacent to the proposed subdivision): • Public and private right-of-ways and easements ❑ • Public and private sanitary and storm sewer lines ❑ • Domestic water mains including fire hydrants ❑ • Major power telephone transmission lines (50,000 volts or greater) ❑ • Watercourses ❑ • Deed reservations for parks, open spaces, pathways and other land encumbrances ❑ • The location of all trees with a diameter 6 inches or greater measured at 4 feet above ground level ❑ • The location of all structures and the present uses of the structures, and a statement of which structures are to remain after platting ❑ Supplemental information including: • Proposed deed restrictions (if any) ❑ • A proposed plan for provision of subdivision improvements ❑ Existing natural features including rock outcroppings, wetlands and marsh areas The proposed lot configurations, lot sizes and dimensions, and lot numbers. Where lots are to be used for purposes other than residential, it shall be indicated upon such lots ❑ If any of the foregoing information cannot practicably be shown on the preliminary plat, it shall be incorporated into a narrative and submitted with the application materials Cl Preliminary Partition/Lot Line Adjustment Plan The owner of the subject parcel ❑ The owner's authorized agent ❑ The map scale, north arrow and date ❑ Proposed property lines ❑ Description of parcel location and boundaries ❑ Contour lines (2' intervals for slopes 0-10% or 5'for slopes >10%) ❑ Location, width and names of streets, easements and other public ways within and adjacent to the parcel ❑ Location of all permanent buildings on and within 25'of all property lines ❑ Location and width of all water courses ❑ Location of any trees with 6"or greater caliper at 4' above ground level ❑ All slopes greater than 25% ❑ Location of existing and proposed utilities and utility easements ❑ Any applicable deed restrictions ❑ Evidence that land partition will not preclude efficient future land division where applicable ❑ Future street extension plan showing existing and potential street connections ❑ City of Tigard Land Use Application Checklist Page 3 of 5 Site Development Plan ." The proposed site and surrounding properties ❑ y Contour line intervals ❑ • The locations, dimensions and proposed names of the following: • Existing and platted streets and other public ways ❑ ♦ Easements on the site and on adjoining properties ❑ ♦ Proposed streets or other public ways and easements on the site ❑ • Alternative routes of dead-end or proposed streets that require future extensions ❑ • The locations and dimensions of the following: ♦ Entrances and exits on the site ❑ • Parking and circulation areas ❑ ♦ Loading and service areas ❑ ♦ Pedestrian and bicycle circulation ❑ ♦ Outdoor common areas ❑ ♦ Above ground utilities ❑ ♦ Trash and recyclable material areas ❑ The locations, dimensions and setback distances of the following: ♦ Existing permanent structures, improvements, utilities and easements which are located on the site and on adjacent property within 25' of the site ❑ • Proposed structures, improvements, utilities and easements on the site ❑ • Sanitary sewer facilities ❑ • Existing or proposed sewer reimbursement agreements ❑ • Storm drainage facilities and analysis of downstream conditions ❑ Locations and type(s) of outdoor lighting considering crime prevention techniques ❑ The locations of the following: • All areas to be landscaped ❑ • Mailboxes ❑ ♦ Structures and their orientation ❑ Landscape Plan Location of trees to be removed ❑ Location, size and species of existing plant materials ❑ General location, size and species of proposed plan materials ❑ Landscape narrative that addresses: • Soil conditions and how plant selections were derived for them ❑ • Plans for soil treatment such as stockpiling the top soil ❑ ♦ Erosion control measures that will be used ❑ Location and description of the irrigation system where applicable ❑ Location and size of fences, buffer areas and screening ❑ -> Location of terraces, decks, shelters, play areas, and common open spaces ❑ Public Improvements/Streets Plan Proposed right-of-way locations and widths ❑ A scaled cross-section of all proposed streets plus any reserve strips ❑ • Approximate centerline profiles showing the finished grade of all streets including street extensions for a reasonable distance beyond the limits of the proposed subdivision ❑ City of Tigard Land Use Application Checklist Page 4 of 5 Grading/Erosion Control Plan The locations and extent to which grading will take place ❑ • Existing and proposed contour lines ❑ Slope ratios ❑ Utilities Plan Approximate plan and profiles of proposed sanitary and storm sewers with grades and pipe sizes indicated on the plans ❑ Plan of the proposed water distribution system, showing pipe sizes and the locations of valves and meter sizes ❑ > Fire hydrants (existing and proposed) ❑ Proposed fire protection system ❑ Preliminary Storm Drainage Plan The location of all areas subject to inundation or storm water overflow ❑ Location, width and direction of flow of all water courses and drainageways ❑ Location and estimated size of proposed storm drainage lines ❑ Where applicable, location and estimated size and dimensions of proposed water quality/detention facility ❑ Tree Preservation/Mitigation Plan Identification of the location, size and species of all existing trees ❑ Program to save existing trees or mitigate tree removal (Section 18.790.030) ❑ A protection program defining standards and methods to be used during and after construction ❑ Architectural Drawings Floor plans indicating the square footage of all structures and their proposed use ❑ • Elevation drawings for each elevation of the structure ❑ Sign Drawings • Specify proposed location, size and height ❑ i:1;cu rpl n\masters\revised\check)i st.doc 18-Sep-01 City of Tigard Land Use Application Checklist Page 5 of 5 i" 1,-,.. k1.�b T - , ,, , , r ? yk a, os :11-x,-,,..,,,:4,..:, ,-%,,1c #,-i,•4' t41 m fi;6F �} s4 m z > ENGINEEAG 'ION „ De,v,,elrip„�t, s3tiapitig .A Heyr ._ Community. PUBLIC FACILITIES Tax Maptsl: 2S1 O1AA Tax Lolls]: , 0, 0,80 Use Type: Commercial 8300 870850 Office Bld60 g. The extent of necessary public improvements and dedications which shall be required of the applicant will be recommended by City staff and subject to approval by the appropriate authority. There will be no final recommendation to the decision making authority on behalf of the City staff until all concerned commenting agencies, City staff and the public have had an opportunity to review and comment on the application. The following comments are a projection of public improvement related requirements that may be required as a condition of development approval for your proposed project. Right-of-way dedication: The City of Tigard requires that land area be dedicated to the public: (1.) To increase abutting public rights-of-way to the ultimate functional street classification right-of-way width as specified by the Community Development Code; or (2.) For the creation of new streets. Approval of a development application for this site will require right-of-way dedication for: SW to feet SW to feet SW to feet SW to feet Street improvements: Partial street improvements will be necessary along SW 69th, Beveland, and 68th, to include: feet of pavement concrete curb storm sewers and other underground utilities -foot concrete sidewalk Ar street trees planted per TDC standards. street signs, traffic control devices, streetlights and a two-year streetlight fee. CITY OF ARD Pre-Application Conference Notes Page 1 of 6 TMM Ei,Ieeenes OepanmeetSecttee U Other: street improvements will be necessary along SW , to include: n feet of pavement concrete curb 1 1 storm sewers and other underground utilities -foot concrete sidewalk 1 1 street trees n street signs, traffic control devices, streetlights and a two-year streetlight fee. Other: street improvements will be necessary along SW , to include: feet of pavement concrete curb storm sewers and other underground utilities 1 1 -foot concrete sidewalk street trees 1 street signs, traffic control devices, streetlights and a two-year streetlight fee. Other: street improvements will be necessary along SW , to include: feet of pavement concrete curb I 1 storm sewers and other underground utilities -foot concrete sidewalk 1 1 street trees 1 1 street signs, traffic control devices, streetlights and a two-year streetlight fee. Other: street improvements will be necessary along SW , to include: I I feet of pavement n concrete curb 1 1 storm sewers and other underground utilities -foot concrete sidewalk CITY OF nun Pre-Application Conference Notes Page 2 of 6 E!!Iloorl!!lopartmentSecUo! I street trees 1 I street signs, traffic control devices, streetlights and a two-year streetlight fee. I I Other: Agreement for Future Street Improvements: In some cases, where street improvements or other necessary public improvements are not currently practical, the improvements may be deferred. In such cases, a condition of development approval may be specified which requires the property owner(s) to execute a non-remonstrance agreement which waives the property owner's right to remonstrate against the formation of a local improvement district. The following street improvements may be eligible for such an agreement: (1.) (2.) Overhead Utility Lines: I Section 18.810.120 of the Tigard Municipal Code (TMC) requires all overhead utility lines adjacent to a development to be placed underground or, at the election of the developer, a fee in-lieu of undergrounding can be paid. This requirement is valid even if the utility lines are on the opposite side of the street from the site. If the fee in-lieu is proposed, it is equal to $ 27.50 per lineal foot of street frontage that contains the overhead lines. There are existing overhead utility lines which run adjacent to this site along SW Prior to , the applicant shall either place these utilities underground, or pay the fee in- lieu described above. Sanitary Sewers: The nearest sanitary sewer line to this property is a(n) 8 inch line which is located in both SW 69th and 68th Avenues. The proposed development must be connected to a public sanitary sewer. It is the developer's responsibility to extend a lateral to the new building. Water Supply: The Tualatin Valley Water District (TVWD) (Phone:(503) 642-1511) provides public water service in the area of this site. This service provider should be contacted for information regarding water supply for your proposed development. Fire Protection: Tualatin Valley Fire and Rescue District (South Division) [Contact: Eric McMullen, (503) 612-7010] provides fire protection services within the City of Tigard. The District should be contacted for information regarding the adequacy of circulation systems, the need for fire hydrants, or other questions related to fire protection. CITY OF TIGARD Pre-Application Conference Notes Page 3 of 6 Eiglaeerlag Department Section Storm Sewer Improvements: All proposed development within the City shall be designed such that storm water runoff is conveyed to an approved public drainage system. The applicant will be required to submit a proposed storm drainage plan for the site, and may be required to prepare a sub-basin drainage analysis to ensure that the proposed system will accommodate runoff from upstream properties when fully developed. Onsite detention is required. Submit preliminary sizing calculations shall be submitted with the land use application. Storm Water Quality: The City has agreed to enforce Surface Water Management (SWM) regulations established by the Unified Sewerage Agency (USA) (Resolution and Order No. 00-7) which requires the construction of on-site water quality facilities. The facilities shall be designed to remove 65 percent of the phosphorus contained in 100 percent of the storm water runoff generated from newly created impervious surfaces. The resolution contains a provision that would allow an applicant to pay a fee in-lieu of constructing an on-site facility provided specific criteria are met. The City will use discretion in determining whether or not the fee in-lieu will be offered. If the fee is allowed, it will be based upon the amount of new impervious surfaces created; for every 2,640 square feet, or portion thereof, the fee shall be $210. Preliminary sizing calculations for any proposed water quality facility shall be submitted with the development application. It is anticipated that this project will require: FI Construction of an on-site water quality facility. n Payment of the fee in-lieu. Other Comments: All proposed sanitary sewer and storm drainage systems shall be designed such that City maintenance vehicles will have unobstructed access to critical manholes in the systems. Maintenance access roadways may be required if existing or proposed facilities are not otherwise readily accessible. 1. A traffic impact report shall be submitted with the land use application. The traffic engineer must look at impacts to local intersections and look at PM peak trip contributions to two critical vicinity intersections: SW 68th/Dartmouth and SW 72nd/Dartmouth. TRAFFIC IMPACT FEES In 1990, Washington County adopted a county-wide Traffic Impact Fee (TIF) ordinance. The Traffic Impact Fee program collects fees from new development based on the development's projected impact upon the City's transportation system. The applicant shall be required to pay a fee based upon the number of trips which are projected to result from the proposed development. The calculation of the TIF is based on the proposed use of the land, the size of the project, and a general use based fee CITY OF TIGARD Pre-Application Conference Notes Page 4 of 6 Ejgluoorlq IopirtmalSoctlou category. The TIF shall calculated at the time of buil permit issuance. In limited circumstances, payment of tl1„ [IF may be allowed to be deferred _ id! the issuance of an occupancy permit. Deferral of the payment until occupancy is permissible only when the TIF is greater than $5,000.00. Pay TIF. Any funds paid toward the critical intersections listed above would be TIF creditable. PERMITS Engineering Department Permits: Any work within a public right-of-way in the City of Tigard requires a permit from the Engineering Department. There are two types of permits issued by Engineering, as follows: Street Opening Permit (SOP). This permit covers relatively minor work in a public right-of-way or easement, such as sidewalk and driveway installation or repair, and service connections to main utility lines. This work may involve open trench work within the street. The permittee must submit a plan of the proposed work for review and approval. This type of permit requires a non-refundable $150.00 fee. In certain cases, where City costs may exceed the $150.00 fee, an administrative deposit will be required. In addition, the permittee will be required to post a bond or similar financial security for the work. Compliance Agreement (CAP). This permit covers more extensive work such as main utility line extensions, street improvements, etc. In subdivisions, this type of permit also covers all grading and private utility work. Plans prepared by a registered professional engineer must be submitted for review and approval. This type of permit requires a deposit to be submitted with the construction plans. The amount of the deposit depends upon the overall value of the public improvements. The City will track its costs throughout the life of the permit, and will either refund any remaining portion of the deposit, or invoice the permittee in cases where City costs exceeds the deposit amount. The permittee will also be required to post a performance bond, or other such suitable security, and execute a Developer/Engineer Agreement which will obligate the design engineer to perform the primary inspection of the public improvement construction work. Prior to City acceptance of any permitted work, and prior to release of work assurance bond(s), the work shall be deemed complete and satisfactory by the City in writing. The permittee is responsible for the work until such time written City acceptance of the work is posted. NOTE: If an Engineering Permit is required,the applicant must obtain that permit prior to release of any permits from the Building Division. Building Division Permits: The following is a brief overview of the type of permits issued by the Building Division. For a more detailed explanation of these permits, please contact the Development Services Counter at 503-639-4171, ext. 304. CITY OF fl6ARD Pre-Application Conference Notes Page 5 016 Eioloonrine'apartment Section ' site Improvement Pt,,,nit (SIT). This permit is general', issued for all new commercial, industrial and multi-family projects. This permit will also be required for land partitions where lot grading and private utility work is required. This permit covers all on-site preparation, grading and utility work. Home builders will also be required to obtain a SIT permit for grading work in cases where the lot they are working on has slopes in excess of 20% and foundation excavation material is not to be hauled from the site. Building Permit (BUP). This permit covers only the construction of the building and is issued after, or concurrently with, the SIT permit. Master Permit (MST). This permit is issued for all single and multi-family buildings. It covers all work necessary for building construction, including sub-trades (excludes grading, etc.). This permit can not be issued in a subdivision until the public improvements are substantially complete and a mylar copy of the recorded plat has been returned by the applicant to the City. For a land partition, the applicant must obtain an Engineering Permit, if required, and return a mylar copy of the recorded plat to the City prior to issuance of this permit. Other Permits. There are other special permits, such as mechanical, electrical and plumbing that may also be required. Contact the Development Services Counter for more information. GRADING PLAN REQUIREMENTS FOR SUBDIVISIONS All subdivision projects shall require a proposed grading plan prepared by the design engineer. The engineer will also be required to indicate which lots have natural slopes between 10% and 20%, as well as lots that have natural slopes in excess of 20%. This information will be necessary in determining if special grading inspections will be required when the lots develop. The design engineer will also be required to shade all structural fill areas on the construction plans. In addition, each homebuilder will be required to submit a specific site and floor plan for each lot. The site plan shall include topographical contours and indicate the elevations of the corners of the lot. The builder shall also indicate the proposed elevations at the four corners of the building. PREPARED BY: E NEERING DEPA TMENT ST FF Phone: (503)639-4111 Fax: [503)684-1291 i:leng'brianAtemplates'.preap notes-eng dot Revised: April 21,2000 CITY OFTIGARD Pre-Application Conference Notes Page 6 of 6 Enulmearinp Iepartmi nt Section I •, • PRE-APPLICATION , 0�'i� CONFERENCE REQUEST CITY OF TIGARD 13125 SW Hall Blvd., Tigard, OR 97223(503) 639-4171 FAX: (503) 684-7297 GENERAL INFORMATION FOR STAFF USE ONLY Applicant: 1 . (wt.) 7/714 Address: I Z Cj S W 7Z Z-OC-3 Phone: 63C1 2.63c1 Case No.: 7REDicoa - 0001 City: i (kid Zip: 91 22-3 Receipt No.: j-00? - 3� (� Application`Accepted By: • 'Ith�H Contact Person: I I VA Phone: -vtnt' Date: %` Property Owner/Deed Holder(s): S C-\Wks DATE OF PRE-APP.: r � ' - . TIME OF PRE-APP.: ` Address: Phone: PRE-APP. HELD WITH: City: Zip: Rev.12/6/2000 i:\curpin\masters\revised\Pre-App Request.doc Property Address/Location(s): REQUIRED SUBMITTAL ELEMENTS (Note: applications will not be accepted without the required submittal elements) Tax Map & Tax Lot#(s): "sino `760 `-iOC cc 1K Zcc es s-r Port l- e■y ktr . ❑ Pre-Application Conf. Request Form Site Size: /786, AS lot 2 COPIES EACH OF THE FOLLOWING: Brief Description of the Proposal and PRE-APPLICATION any site-specific questions/issues that RE-APPLICATION CONFERENCE INFORMATION you would like to have staff research prior to the meeting. All of the information identified on this form are required to be submitted by the applicant and received by the Planning Division a [1] Site Plan. The site plan must show the minimum of one (1) week prior to officially scheduling a proposed lots and/or building layouts drawn to scale. Also, show the location of the s pre-application conference date/time to allow staff ample time to the subject to tubject property in relation to the prepare for the meeting. nearest streets; and the locations of driveways on the subject property and A pre-application conference can usually be scheduled within 1-2 across the street. weeks of the Planning Division's receipt of the request for either Tuesday or Thursday mornings. Pre-application conferences are ❑ The Proposed Uses. one (1) hour long and are typically held between the hours of ❑ Topographic Information. Include 9:00-11:00 AM. Contour Lines if Possible. ❑ If the Pre-Application Conference is for a PRE-APPLICATION CONFERENCES MUST BE SCHEDULED IN MONOPOLE project, the applicant must PERSON AT THE COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT COUNTER FROM attach a copy of the letter and proof in 8:00-4:00/MONDAY-FRIDAY. the form of an affidavit of mailing, that the collocation protocol was completed IF MORE THAN 4 PEOPLE ARE EXPECTED TO ATTEND THE (see Section 18.798.080 of the Tigard PRE-APPLICATION CONFERENCE IN YOUR GROUP, PLEASE Community Development Code). INFORM THE CITY IN ADVANCE SO THAT ALTERNATE ROOM ❑ Filing Fee $240.00 ARRANGEMENTS CAN BE MADE TO ACCOMMODATE THE GROUP. Pre-Apps (CD Meetings) February 2002 S M T W T F S 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 Tuesday, February 19, 2002 8:00 8:30 9:00 Pre-app Tim Roth 503.639-2639 4 parcels on 69th/SDR ,`�,` 9:30 r� 10:00 Pre-app Ken Brae 503-639.0828 9570 SW Tigard/SDR (Tentative) k\ �\� ■ 10:30 00 1 11:00 Pre-app \.4 ‘t. 11:30 12:00 12:30 1:00 1:30 2:00 2:30 3:00 3:30 4:00 4:30 5:00 5:30 6:00 2:14PM Tuesday, February 05, 2002 Feb. 5, 2002 City of Tigard Applicant/Owner: J.T. Roth, Jr. 13125 SW Hall 12600 SW 72nd# 200 Tigard, Or. 97223 Tigard, Or. 97223 Attn: Planning Dept. RE: Pre-app. meeting Tax lot 8700, Block 29 West Portland Heights NARRATIVE: It is our desire to construct a commercial office building on property located north of SW Beveland between SW 68th and SW 69th, Tax lot 8300, 8700, 8500,8600, Block 29 West Portland Heights (see attached). The proposed development project consists of approx. 7500 s.£ f new office commercial, single story building constructed with `masonry veneer on 4-sides. The approach located off S.W. 68th currently exists as an access easement to the benefit of the subject property and a second approach is being proposed off S.W. Beveland. All off-site improvements exists on all three road frontages, with intentions of connection sewer and storm to the laterals off SW 696h There are no specific questions regarding the proposed improvement. It would me my desire to present this application with my designer present whereas any concerns the staff may have could be noted by the designer during this meeting. The project is being designed under the Tigard Triangle Standards in a M.U.E. zoning. Submit :� , . 7 / yim it / ,K til : . 4 P o ( / / rf,..., x int:O I I • )A, 'Hl t9 7._ r rt� I Q ,, I � .� z I x acID i N a x 1 1 x— 4, ii A:, / 1 1 Nit 15 tiliP ,' i - t,/ 8° a - k3/1,_ .�J_, . t I _ 4 1 i - 'l�M71d + I� u � # ' X �. if b r Tr r r r-r rf.c�'v-rir- "H fr�� r� _ 7"..pro i t-11- P 1. J ' 7/ lowipl i /410 -- extemez-vil -..___ 1,,. .- / 41(//' ear•swen-sesaV-- -;ri ' / Pm, , ( lin • ; ' Jel - - alb 'N169 7 x -IIIM � • 11 Alit, / I I ril f� 111 o I I IIti, III f� 0 Iii , • •ti -' al - e" of' 0/ ___.0 . x MI D /iiiii 1 1I 1 i / / .------ 0 I * ( \ =' i . iftv-ii, - -. ,.__ __ , , __,__ _, , ADDITIONAL DOCUMENTS \CG' OC OC G ,`S.LciETTER OF RESPONSE To: Shirley Treat Project: 8.7008`uilding SDR2002-00006 Date: Dec. 4,2002 Company: City of Tigard Phone: 503/639-4171 Fax: _503/ Please find attached a copy of the above referenced SDR 2002-00006. A response to article number 1 is required to be directed to Shirley Treat. *A detailed drawing including the floor plan has been submitted for building permits, more specifically pages 22 and 23 refer to four units (suites) on the main floor and four units (suites) on the second floor. Please contact us direct if you need a separate set of documents, otherwise please refer to those building permit documents for approval. Si 0. gif;0 . R t h,Jr. IT Roth Construction, Inc. — 12600 S.W. 72nd Ave.,Suite 200,Tigard,Oregon 97223 503/639-2639 FAX 503/624-0239 CCB#0031700 — REvt5IGN.9 a'r. 10/9/02 PW 10/15/02 pw \--- s".4.j TN ROTH CONSTRUCTION 1NC• x 2 G . ' tm.ifils OFFICE BuILDING g g 1 a n a � 5ai /I Zii N.,,. COIRNE OF S.,d. & sun AVE . 4 S.,i. EL VE L A \D 57. I h a u 2 i GAUD , O O\ X72 2 3 LA6— I \ TO\ CO, -\T' is 1hg OWNER / GENERAL CONTRACTOR: STRUCTURAL ENGINEER: BUILDING DESIGNER: J. T. Roth Construction Inc. Rowell Engineering 4 Design Inc. PDW 0 12600 SW 12nd Ave. Suite 200 45 N.E. 102nd Ave. 13600 S.E. Taylor Court Tigard, Or. 91223 Portland, OR 91216 Portland, OR 91233 z f W (503) 639-2639, Fax: (503) 624-0239 (503) 254-6292 Fax: (503) 254-6161 (503) 252-8015, Fax: (503) 251-1692 m c 0 m a 3 m 'I,' 0 ti m P. a co ° 2 D i�.4 UJ 11�1G-s S a � T 1 TN,(D a >< Z SUBJECT SITE BU I LD INCA CODE SUMMARY' o a d,CONSTRUCTION TYPE: =N ~ ,-p� ! I.COVER SHEET 13.FOUNDATION DETAILS 4 SPEC. e ligit4. Ii11,. BUILDING USE: OFFICE 2.SITE PLAN 14.2ND FLOOR FRAMING PL N t SPEC. o H m x I!,� - OCCUPANCY GROUP: B 3. UTILITY PLAN 15. ROOF FRAMING PLAN 4 SPEC. z = o LL © STORIES: TWO 4. SITE LIGHTING PLAN I . ROOF PLAN 4 NOTES ca z 5. LANDSCAPING FLOOR PLAN Ii.STRUCTURAL PLAN, DETAILS 4 SPEC. = ' ,A FIRE SPRINKLER SYSTEM: NO 6. 1ST FLOOR PLAN IS. 1ST FLOOR CEIL/ELECTRIG PLAN ° 0 N ° I.2ND FLOOR PLAN 15.2ND FLOOR CEIL/ELECTRIC PLAN S. EAST AND WEST ELEVATION 20. IST FLOOR MEGH. PLAN t SPEC. ' r 3W�.ii 9_NORTH AND SOUTH ELEVATION 21.1ND FLOOR MECH. PLAN t SPEC.10. CROSS SECTION 4 DETAIL 22.T-1 1ST FLOOR PLAN o.' H.LONG SECTION, DETAILS 23. T-I 2ND FLOOR PLAN mea3/m2 12.FOUNDATION PLAN,DTL'S 4 SPECS. 24.SPECIFCATION 4 NOTES rna. �. ��(1[3i� �w NCENlT�' M,4F 0 .#,E;h .��+at'f ..8700 BLDG. to(=0 pi, _ WY I ...Xi' f ...At i / v..// i 7./..../ REVI SIONS BT ; 10%:/02 Pw 10/18/0 PW LI., .. ... ,............. I � g' l ••• MIN,.o rrr /,,,(Th CO.T.tl PARKINS V I 0' EXIST PAWNS T4114 INCLOSED EXISTINCx FIREHYDRANT PLAN \-�I-- -° — �.`` ► \\ > 0 1•'200' .1 � . > .. ' lig.4 Q l X CO (jl : b • 1 I BUILDING i• w t -r• ♦ 1 f e we. MAN/L12 3r62.DOT. ti:, ,r--W-1 1 I �� \ .� ao PLR 3e■].acFT- ■ Trsa.xfr. t MMM ■ • \ MME 1 ■ ■ S141-�O � ■ Y =mom • •im ■.l:l.:.af om IDSST CRT AIDBLL4LK I .- Immo MMIM1 ' = Mil- "Ir-I = I i-- MM W_ lii IMMO MI INM si 1 0 SIGN ELEVATIONS T° ELI / .re-r OC SW BEVELAND ST m � 04 SITE PLAN PARKING DATA: 1'•20' N BUILDING AREA 1634 SOFT. O 0 -A GENERAL NOTES lb x 33= 25 SPACES ALLOWED 9 CP SPACES Sl•IOU1,I 25 TOTAL v N ‘;I. EXIST SITE VACANT OF STANDARD 14 EA. u E M e VAN ACC 1-IC I EA. ANT BUILDING. COMPACT 10 EA. u . LEGAL DES: Q m X 2.NO EXIST TREES ON SITE. TOTAL 25 SPACES x a SEE ATTACI-i 5 v 2 ys m p H A O r Ycgo OCm FAR DATA: SITE DATA: ' 'A g TOTAL NET FLOOR AREA 1,146.SOFT. TOTAL LOT SIZE 11866.SOFT. TOTAL SITE AREA 11866.SOFT.- 40% BUILDING LOT COVERAGE 3,101.SOFT. 20.1 % "'08!13/02 awI M LANDSCAPING AREA 3,414.SOFT. 15.1 % tall o.am w. PAvNG AREA 10151.SQFT, 602 % �4r■a�,� POW TOTAL GROSS FLR AREA 1634.SOFT. *Al LESS 1ST FLR ELEVATOR - 132 11,866.SQFT.. 100_0% �F,�°I"Ffy v4•• I'-V lun FI O=1 c,A1f • ta, 411P 1 SITE PLAN r 8ICO e . $ I 8 1 ii.p!li If , i / il ' 1p T 1.00, gg� !If p 5 gAIP 4 rTI',...;.,..'1'1' I'I'1'1'1 1'1'1'1'1'1'11')",'1'1'1'1'1'1'1'1 _ 'III �i---------------,-".-.-.•.--.-.-•"•--.-.,-.- 1, 1 1 II Ill,'I'li1'I'1'1'1 1'1'11 I'1'1'III',1, 1,1,1,1,1,1,1, MIN! I y• I ; I l 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 III,1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1,1 � ��1!1!1!L1!L1!1!1!:!1!1I1ljltllllll;'ili=,,,1' O. F 1lLfl1!ali.1.1,41,1,1,1,1,1 1,1,1,1, 1,1,111,1,1,1,1,1,1,1,1,1 � °, '1'1'1,.,.,.,14,,.,.,,�...............1'1'1'I 1'1'I'1'I'I'1'1'I'1.1.1'1.1.1'1'1` P l!lI 1' mil! 1,1,1,1,111,1,1,1,1,111,1,1 111111' ' $y■ r[ ,i;!•:::,::111,111 1,1 1 1 I,I,1,1 l:,1,1,1 :,1,1,1,1,1,1,1,1,111 1,1,1,1,1,1,1 1111111111 1,1 3 i >,i ll lil!Il�il!la,l:l�l:;l 111 IIII 111111111:1:11!1!1:11;1�1: 1111;1:1:. IIII C 11 11;�1:!1l1a{41;!!1.!!�',;i!i!I;Illllllli:,!1:! li;;;;;;;i;;IIII{I I!iI I!I!I;;i'! !,!{ '111:1 I' '1111111'1'111' 1,1'1'1'1- 1!11 FF 11'1!I!'''!''il1lll 1'1'111 'I 1 1 1 '''l'i 111 1 11111111 1111 I ®®'I l !!'IIII'®®;Ai 10:10, ® 1 Il11111®® 1111 111 1111 111 111 I 1111111 i ,1, � 1,1 11 1 1 11 11 llllll 1111' 1111'1' ° !l�1i1 ®®h 1111;111;11111;®® l;;;lli 'h1 I+i!i'ii;;'�;�l�i!I',;,�1'■'1_-_�__l: il;liiilllll;lu ;l;11l;lu 1 r 111 11 1;11111111 Illililal Ili• i Ili.;ll,�ll�l l 1!i 11111' ®IIII 1IIIII11111!111!®® '''I'''l! 9 IP ;1'1111 1;111'111'111;1111111; 11111 111111111;1;111;1;111; i1;;1;1;r 111 N „I,1;1,11, 1;141 1'I 1111111111111111 '1111111'1 11/11! iii1.li1i1i1i11111�;1 111 1111111111i11ii;:111:1:1111;a 1;11h111 :'1'I 4 ;1 ,1 i11111!+1i ;!111 ®®''I :,111111:11'1111®® 1'1'!'111' 1,,,l 1' "1 1 II,I,''1,1,,I11i:• _ '1 1:1'I:llllll l llllll 1 (1u 1�1 ,1 1,1,1,1,1,1,1,1 1 1 ?' ®®'1 iii:iiii1,1,1,1®® !mil!!{ i;l;.i•,I 1 ,,.,:,,I' ,,,.11,,:,1,.11; I, I,I,f III,1,,1,,,1,1,,,1,.,.,, i;1,1,1,11 ,I 1,1,1,1,1,1,1,1 ,1 1 I 1 I'�;'' ;l�l;i;i�'�','�' 1;111111;Ililllllllll ;IIII l/'III'I'1'III'Illllllll{IIII ;1'1'11111 ' �;`� 11 111111111111111' 1{i11111ii 1 ,!�i�l; �;;;1;11,11 ,,��11.1i1l1l14l;1 ,l:;:IIII::ll;l,!,i1i1l1!1l1i1,l,! ,,;,;,;,; ;. 1 II 111111:11111111 11111111. Ii!:'';1;h1;111;1;11$I;I;I; 111 lii'llilllllllli '1'44;'1 I ®®I1 111'I'11111a'1®_®, 1111111 1 1,1111111111111 ®®1 1111,1,11;111®® :11111;111 :.�,H : ,II 1l: Ili 11 '''i'i'i'i'i'i'i'i'i'I'I'11' 11 ''ii!111 11{11- - ' ;, ui;; Ii1'i1' i'iil 11'!11:{ ; I011l1I fl I1 11 1'1 ':1®ill lil!11111'Iilil®® 111!1111 .' 1' =Rita 111i!lii;11111'i®® ;Iil ;li.1 11111111111.,...,.:.... I!!Il! I, ' '.i:il,i,::::1111 Ill 1111;111111111q 111111,111 '1-1.1 1.1. 1'111 1'I�II 1! IIII 1'1'1 11,1,1,.,1 ,1 11, �,,,;i�;'i;l;,;,;I'I'I'14l I 1 1 1 1 1 1 111111:111 1.11 1111 I I I 11111 I I I9 ,,;,1,1 1 1 1 11 11111 1+ II Ill 111111111111 1111111111 1 11111111 1 �<pI i �I i i 011 Il 11 11 111 1 111;111'11{='ii111111 1;1�1;i�i;;;;,; :,1;111 11 IIIIIII'IIIIIII 11111'111 {ZE-. $c •I �H�H'Hill !1!11:11 1i11i1.1:111. 1 I:LI i!;,LL i��,111,1 Elmo ,1,1,1,1, 1,1,:®® ,1,1,1,11, b ° 1'I 1'1 1'1'.'1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 71 ®®1 1111111 IIII 1,1!".'1'111'11!'11111:1 1;1:1:11111!;1;111,1! Ill,I,I,1,I,:I,lil;l;l;l;l;I;1;1;1 1,1,111,1, II '111'11111 Ill 1 Il 1 1 .!1 1�1, 1 1.1.1 �1,1,1,1,1,11,1,1,1,1 ,I I,I,I,I,I,I,I,I,ililililililili i!ilililil Ii 1,1,1,111,1,1,1®® '' „ 1111':-.•!•:;..... .1.1.1.1.1.1.1.1.1.1-1 LII1.1-1.1.1.1.1.1 ,1 1,111,111,::1 11,111, `tT i 1' 1il"1'1'1:1 ilili'ilililil:llllll:i''1 1;1;1;1111':'�Ii'i'il:Iilililili'ililili'ilililii �. 'i 1'1'1'1'!'1'1'1 111!!!'11 ' „..„,�.1l{i ppl i1111ihi!liiligimi{!i!1!1!4in6{!11 14.1.1.4:!;!f!i!{f!{:!iiiii 111;11:11.1 M E I, 1'1111,1,1,1 11®® :11111 Iii 7 11 liiillllll{!i1 i�i1i!i!1!1!1!1!1!1'1 41 Illill1111i i!i!i!i!i!i'i'i!i!!i,i ,�yi�i��f IgiP.11i;:l:iam am l lil'ililililil.-. i'ililil' 71 1!1 I Il 1 1! 1!1 1 1 1 1 - 1 11'1'1'1 111'1ll- 1. 11'.: i? `....•,..r1.i:111 11:�l111 1111111:Ili;1144!1:1!1:L. ,;�i t�.,.1. i!i1I11'II!Iia!;iIiI:I Ii :li;iiiiiiiiii I; lilliliiiilli::pp55y l ilfl{1:1!1:1{ i f I fl{Ill 111111111;1 111;:144;1;1;1;1;111;1;1114;1;141114;5 ' !i 1 l;1;1;1;.;111;. ®Ii1 111;144111:®®IIII;:;11111144= . , 1 p[ , 1111 1 1 1 1 1{1111{!1!11111 .111,1,I,1.1,1.1,11 11111.1.111.1.1.1.1.1,1,1,1,1,1,1,1,1,1 ...,-N:11.1....11111.1.1- -Ail 11,1,11:1,1,1,- ,11 1,1,1,1,: 1,1: 7777 p , 11'•1'•1'1' •i'1111:' i'1'i'i'III'.:X1,1,1k,11,1:'i'i'i 11111,111111: ;1,,:1,,,, 111,1,1,1,1,1) I,1 1,111,1,1,1,1,1- q ILJ$ {l�ii�il�liiiliiii�l�iill{:1!1 ll ,444;,144:1:1:1:1:1,1:1:1:1:1:1 i'1'I'I'I'1'I' i:il1' 1 1.'11111.1,!!,!j1i 1i'i'I1:10,1i'®®1'i''I'i'I'''I'i'l ,.g R - - 1 1111 ',111, 1l II111'11111'1'i l,!.1 1' 1 '1'1"'1'1' -- I'1ililiii1111'111� 9y 1 1, 1,1,I,1,1,1,1, 1,1,1,1,1,1,1,1,1 1 l I 1 llllllll'1'llll- Ill lllllllllll'111- !NMI®I, '''''''l''''''®®'''11,111,111,: 1 F `_':1 I!!!!!1!1!11• ,:::,1;11-114,..IIi1!1!iiiii!iii!iiii;!il?1 , : 1,1,: ll 44'1 llhllh 111 Il 11111 111 111 1':'I'1'1•I'1'1'1'1'1'I'I t'1'I.1'1.1'1.1.1'I•I'1•I.1'1'I I'1'1'I'1'1'I'1'1'I'1'I'1'1'1'1'II Ill:Illlllll� �',, I 1411111'1'4 4i11'444ii411 1 ,;:';1;';1;'1 X411 44i111:411i141:4i1114111'1111i'1111114411111111111';414;1;1;1;'4{'4511;1: p i! I t®® 11I 1 III 1:1yy:1,:11 L;` 1.1.1.1.1.1.1.I.1.1.1!.!.. .1,1.1.1..I,LL1.1.1;,i,,:.1.I,1,1,1.1.I,LLLL,S•II I .1,1.1.'./.1.1.1: I . ®; ili;ili;;1;1;;®®;:i541;I;I;If1{� liil;l;l;il;;;Ki iiii.fi!A1111u51111111;11 1111111;1u11111i1111111IhI111!i1.1 lu!Ili;i; € 111;:51;1;151;1;1;1{1;:5:;!;:: ';;il;li:;li!;!S:;:i:;l;;;l;l;;il;l;;;;;1;1;1;1;!1' II '{,;•;;':';!i•1';•;';;'';r i'; I;I:I;I:,Ii:i'i, I;';I;III; :1 4 11 1 1111111 �®I 111111111®® 11111 I ' 11{:;!I;11.1!1i;i:j;i;illli;i;..., i;i;i;i;i:i4;i;i;ili;i;i;i4;i;l;i:1;1111111;11; G illl''4;11';I;';li';I;'S Ill 111;'li'lilil; 111;1;111 :. 1111111'1'1'1111111'1111111'1 111:1II1'I:II'1'I11:1'1'1:1'1111111�1'1'I:I:I:I:I:i11111� 1 11!111;1;111:111;1,1:1: 111 Ili:ill;lllull; i:1;1;1;1: fT 1-1.11111.1,1.111.1,,,,,1 !'', l I . - 1'1'1' 1'1'1-1'r 1'1'1�1•!•I.1.1.1.1'1�1� # 1111 1111 =E1111 I II111111®I 1111/ � .111!:!'1 il.iirlr pr='li 111111111111111,1111,I�I.I.LI,i 1111111111 1 ;, ;ill' '111;11;! 111111111111111 1::::11 �'`j '' ''''''''''''''' il :; ;ll I11I;i;;l A Q 1!i!' .1i !111111111!11111® f1:11111111111141111111 I ®®Ill l'I'lll'lil''1�®® 11;111;111 1 1 1 1 11111111 1 111 1 { I 11 1111 1 ! 1 1 11111111 ,1� iIll1 111 1 1111111 111 I'1'llllll � !' ; 'ilil11l'l'l11 111:1111,1 1 !1,R {1 Il 1'1'1'1•1•Ih 1•�I'll IIIIIIIIIIIIIllli9'I•I'I'14'1'1•1. 11111,11:1111' ll 1 1,:11:1 1 111 11 111 1;1411i1i1111'{lillll li'411i11lilillli'i'1l;lllil;lllii. ;1x11: 1®� il'i'��11,1•,.� _I® ,, , � �I��{,i i I{111,1:_1,,.1,1..1.Li,,, 1111,,1111,,,,1_.1.1.,.1.,T�.� 11;111: !11i,iy11:111i11'.I� 111�1l 1111'j!1111111111111,11+11!i ,:1111111 HI r!„�11;11111111'1;1',. 111111i1;11il;ilil 11 f4 Li 1'111 �!1:111•,.1•I.l .l,ll 1111111111111111.1.1.1.1•Lcll!lilf I•:h 1 �11 � 1t I l� ,,i;14441111' A� 1�����111lllll' II Illll 1 I'''1111111 1 11' ° Illlllllll'l'''l 11 111 I. I ,11 O 1 1 1:I ,{•llllll;®1 1 1 III 1 1 1 1 1® 1 1 1 1 1 ' 1' 1011'1101111! ...1.1.1.; i e 1 1" i'i li';I; :'!IIII 11'111' 11_ ®® ®® i!HII!d i 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1:1, 11 g 1;i=1' i i1;i,i,i,1,1,1; 11'1,1' 111'111', '1'1 i'{'f'I'i'i'f'1'�I� ''111111'j' 1 ;';'i' ;.1.1.1.1. 1 ®® i i ®® ifflll I I 'IIII 111 11 1111111 111/1 11111 i 1 11 I, ,111,111,111111 1 i 4' 1 11 Idl,l,l,llll IS_i 11111:14:l!I!1 ''lil llull;lllllilllll',11',l 1111'!'111 Y - ,g 11!' 1 IIl1I1:I 11111 1111 Ill! r I;I,I,III,III,I ,1 111„1,1,1,1,1 1,1111111, 111 I1 1115, 11Il1111111r1'1'1'19'1.1-1'1 : 1,: �1I�I I:1.11111 1111:1:1:1:1:1:1:1^l: 11:1!1:1:1!1:1!!Iii11:1.1:1!1!1:1! !1:1!1!1:1 Il!l1'iii11i4;1444iliiil'1: :11111'5:1:1:111'111;1:::111:'1111111111' - .:.:1:1.1:1:1:1!111::['.:::4:1:1:1:1:1:1! 1!i'la:!:i:j:i:ili:i!i!is:1:i:1 i!i''=1 7 1,1 1,!11,1,1,1,111,1!1 ,1,1,1 1,1,1,111,1,1,1,1,:1,1,1, Ililllll I A Ill i' 1':i 11 1 1 1 '1lIllllllllltllll 1 I r� 1101111>i, ICI i 1.1,1.1,1 I,lill 1:1:1:!:I;I:Illl.l,l.l.l,l,l.l.l,1. 1,1,1,1,1 Y �/ F 1 1!1 1 I 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 I 1!1 1 1 1 1 - - -- - ID 11 11:1,:111 I III 111 1 '1'111 'PPP14 1 1 1 1 11 1 1 11 I'P 10111Y'1'I '111'11!!144'!'1'1 11111'I'1Y,119 11 1 ;,;■;,;■;,,;,; ,,ll,� ;Ilililllll!1!1!1!1l1i ililillililflilil{111:1IliIiIIIllililllllllilll!1!1!1!1!1!1:1!1;111;1;,;1;111; 6 ;;144; ®1i 1i::::i1',®® 11{1;111; e `C I; li;Ili i;:Mil";�I III 1i;i1:1i1i;:111:IIII 1111';,';III 11111' 11 I !111111111 111'1!111! �'' 11 �!°!'11'1'®®� ';;; '1 �i���1 : .!fii l�li11 III IlllI I Iii i ;i;ll;l;l;j;'i;i;i;1114; 'ili;i;i;I !► I111!!1i!1!!i=:;11x:1 1 1 11 11 ll11111111111111111 I I 1- :4;I:I;II;: 111:;1;1!;1;1 111i1 IliliiiiiIl ' 1;1 ;i Ll-- ilfililffififlfl{:{,i!Ililili=f. iifi;li1f111;l;11if1!1iii1i1;1{I{!; dill;l; _ 41 ttr {i{{{i{i{ii{{{Uiif{I!f{f{f1i!ilifil{95;{;IIII;ill;{;tis1!';iiiliiliill{i!i{!fi;i;i;ifiS!;!;ii!;!;!1 game j 1'il''I•'Ij1'•'1 j'•'..l.l•iI' 1 i1,■ L L r1':1€Ills:1i1�111€i'.?isllililllSll111Si1!11=iiSiS1S111S111S1S1S1SISIi111S111111'3111!:!:!:1= 11-1 ��1.11111.1l1l1l1l1.1l1lL1.1llilllllllil IISi�II - __ V III a �1I g ill I> O Z g /-' 1 11 7= :/ ,. a5 r i BUILDING DESIGN FOR: PROJECT u- Ab !I J.T.ROTH CONSTRUCTION INC. 8700 BUILDING �� o� P�W�YIDING DEO GNER/PLMNER 0 17600 9111.12ND AVE.SUITE 200 B UI NORTI'WEST CORNER OF o...- STRUCTURAL ENGINEERS 13600 SE TAYLOR CT.I'("3)ID•OI 91233 TIGARD•OREGON 91223 SW 68TH AVE. /BEVELAND STREET 0 oon"ii.:o.m an+s r.I:(xal�s1-11ct PN:(503)331-OmIS PAX'!3031 751-p9T 503/639-2639 FAX 503/639-2639 2 2 REVIEW NE Bri 10/9/02 FW L Y191lY 4•ptlCC,GLCVC M4/CHIY 4.U..DEGIGN 2.c Joe".an ____..,,,,,N,l l Dnacrla� 10/15/02 ply ROOF LINE �` -. ___-- _ _-- __ _��� t111111111111111111�11111111111111111111111111 1_111:i�._____ � __ ______ _�__ _ _ �______�____ ___ oCTI0N 80X0 .------------- ----- _--___-_-------_-_-_--_----------_-_--- CEI LME 111 ___�.________N____________-:__••_�____�����M________--- n • .__-�____�_--_M=_________-1::::1__ __I III; n E 9 a _ all __ ELT=_ __- .: R gv .� _ __°°___ —." �_ ® _ - LNE 6ao.LOOR WmOLWG G QyLL a 2 D FLOOR I-0Q !� ® - - �®�_��®®�__1_ ____ 7^, 1• =slil7i 6i9 Q V i e/Z c g 1 UNE 1 til IIII 11111111IMALE \ , .17.1:1 . . 11 ..._ :.....,..iii.; _„_,..: ., , . . ...-,.. :.......E., § 1,,,,,,, • MAIN FLOOR LINE I- r Ilin101111111111111111111® ii® ��' __ _ _ _ a 1 Io w�: .,,, .. 1 I I 4•eRlaC colL'tl! aroRE na'Nr GLAZPIG —__���_��_ _ 11 I 4w a nrPrm+.t�EMRr DooRS .°____°_ _ I h - - _ E<ISTMG GIN SIDEWALK g LL 1 -I I -■ :_. AND PLFNTER STRIP 1244 I N . ~- I Y—-•• EXISTMG GUF'9 \^ I LIE of FOOTING L L 41 / s / Y ' a �BTEP FOOTING AS L L 1_-L INQUIRED BY GRADE ar1E , L YEpsY 4• li 5 /. UN nmad2r WEER DEOK W LAYQR,TRH YJEPE UY CYNER/BUPPLIRE E z EI�dNMON,owr REa EvERr nm-m•a.wr olRecna r N 111111 _________ _ _ I/4' I'-0' Z _____________________ ___. Q J E1111 _�- IIIIIIIIt11111111111111111t11t11111111111111111111�It111111111111111111111111111111111111111t111111111111111111111111111111: � w ____________ ____________________________�__________ �____ Z _ __�_��______ __ _____________�____�_______________________________________ � BYO° Z ly m X11 I111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111 -_ _ __ -' IYrIGGL s N C _i.:77.-HE®® �_=w®®��®® gym®� ®®-°' s•eRloc ve®e �' Co � 2 _ __ ______ ___ __ __ __ _ �' ado U 11:1S1:7224'".::II 1� _ :_ ___ _ __iiiii::±-1::- __ _�____ __ E_ �_�_ _ LKOAO~���"�+ Z Qf•111 l•.IO1111111t1t1111' ,'Il tlllllltllltllltltltltl tltltlt111Ot111t1t 1111i 1tItl tltltO1t111tItItltltlt111t111t111tItItltltU_IIIIIt11111i11111 ItN i� ~ CUL bilfill 1= -r _ -r_ - wI2 � �FX:, ;I !43"12_ ±_■ _ ________________:___:____�__�____ _____ _ il,! -'! - F- !�-mss.. - _..____. -._____... � p41E'08/23/02 i•I I J 1 J iflR3/111 c+PA®m, 1 J_J _�I� PDW OP OF it ti--__ -�- J ES SS�GINfn Shlc4e. R£vl61d46 BY. <if) 10/9/02 PW 10/15/02 PU) 14'-0' 30'-6' l2 9'-0' 0••g• S'-0' 10'-6' 10'-6' d'-6' 4'-6' 4•-6' 4'-6' 10'-6' 10'-b' S'•0' 0'-S' 0'-3' r b--26 MD woe LN� 6 6- b _ -. ��-_._ i• i 6 2N7 mom LK b- i' • O a ; m 2 G 'L •ma UNIT 101 ( UNIT 102 +V 1 ff n ea n 4'-8' ,2'-0' 8'-0' 8'-0' 22-'g' / 14-.3. m CM 0 — — I 6'-6. < I I 4w ri • a L , EVAToR Il14w.q d°:: - - - I RN - - - '•p � 5 a m c �I T IIETRr-1 -‘ S I _-, J Tit f!!!!ffJ'[ 1 1 1 1 1`III s I I 111 11 ' d TP a I'-6' I I LOBBY gg 9 u•.m• . ► 3-6 yyyyyy'•• .TP % I 5 y2 cue "I"I 'I I I �� O ® n� `III S L ,�p 0 --y I STORAGE k ^li w --X11._1. l•_l. 4;4 I ELE A '_,_ MI= TOILET R11• I m 0 EQUIP_ �� a > .. 1 1 1 1 1 1 I �INNIE I o kt.T. I I I e . = o OF / Y 14._8. 10'-8 I 3._� 4�_0. 1._0. N 1,_=. ,/ p U al ' g j UNIT �!% _ , Q i '' a rya • m .•''.,ff\\���� z: s, n9 UNIT 103 ' v o �°.tr EV ! 007i �J®26 ; ■ �' 1026 ., : • ' 0026 9026 M1 �. W l L:: ---- .� ..,_7_���-�---- --" .. — —BO:AZ, z.o ROCR L.� -9��� _ V r_ .9 9 ,r'P = o m 4•-4 MN 3'-D•MRi. ;• 33 I , -p 0 �' y>� r J0(1 I'-0', r.a'M11. 1 ni.' a 6'-18' 11'-0• 6'-ii. ,{' 4._ . 1 4._ . 6-48' M 11.-0. j. 6.6a 9 i.. Z �. `p1 b -_ 24'-2i' 9x0. 23..4. ��g t7 C� T y� M 9 NM , 2'-0' X 61'-4 ' -0' i 12'-'�6 I / 2-0' 1LL = ' ry 4' Q n 0 r Al 14-0 --f 0 4) .0 d US BAR AT WATER CLOSET Q Q M al Q ��08/23/02 • ADA TOILET RM. NOTES GENERAL NOTES: 1ST FLOG! i�LI4N 1sT F41L RS PER ADA.I URC STANDARD BEE DETAIL INCLUDED L ALL DOORS SHALL BE CAPABLE Q OPEN814 SO THAT THE CLEAR WIDTH OF OPENING c+ioso RT. 'ER ADA.1 URC STANDARDS W/30'X 48' MIN.CLEAR FLOOR SPACE lb NOT LESS THAN 32'(SECT.3109(I)2)OPENING WITH OUT DOORS TO HAVE A CLEAR opal '.CLOSET PER ADA.I URC STANDARD W/48'X 66'MIN.CLEAR FLOOR SPACE WIDTH OP NOT LESS 114.4.1 32' 1/4' • 1'-0' ROOMS SHALL BE PROVIDED WITH ARTIFICIAL LIGHT 1 MECH.VENTILATION 2.SIGN ABOVE TI�O4T DOOR TO READ'THIS DOOR TO REMAIN INLOOCED DURING tiFAO"`fss or.-44.1/4' • 1'-0' .vr•.„n. dMSNN NOM' r,.NGINEF.. G 53'-2' r-v 2•.0• 4' 16'-1' I // 16'-0' ---. I6 '1 _— f 9'-4' 1.-3' / 4 1' 1' 10' d 1 l 3 9'-4' / l'-4' F 12 24. 6421 62Q0 ��_ I IZ Zb 1 40 --„ 6141 0041 IZ 40 ? \ \ \ \ • i� _ % ��� al il r L '\ • te - NIT MOOR IN-,_9 W J C.LGhI I 6. I qq e®—\ \ ei! 4' 15'-1' 3'-11' -I' 6'-0' /, 8'-0' / I 15'-1' S i 1 ,0 1 w___I ,,,, i c c B!. q Z\ 1111 - _ A.li I 6116 6' W a MINI i ai m m s y� �, I e P • UlglIl ..,,, YN PP \ 11 -...` \ to \ v.p.g Is A $ � �Q• D1 P _i c .n 4 e I o 2m a 6\ g 1 LP'' `,i a �0 i �A I \ 0 O e P w fa--n. [ I A 8 \ �w�R� IIIffS O p N _ `_ f. . \\ i iD. A Oohs I It Cg \'-6 I W W L 1 06 et. • \A\1e■ O.PP o 4. 0 u eP R ! C -I g4. AA \ w Cr t rill A i, \ A —I >�3 6 1 {/`OIL 0 I IT II P ''. I P P V. 4§„,40. MT.LQOR L.!-'-?) I \ Ai \ \ l• 6626 6626 6626 6626 _ 8. 0040 04.40 60 04 0641 1 e A I- I 1 / 13'-1a' 1-9116 I, . . I. 8.-6. I, B,-6. I 6..... 1'.4. Z51.-10' A z (Ibil' g/ -1 1 I i BUILDING DESIGN FOR —-- PROJECT: - - -6 ,- J.T. ROTH CONSTRUCTION INC. 8700 BUILDING m PDW DLIDIG DEOICf ER/PLANNER g 7 12600 S.W.12ND AYE.SUITE 200 s on�w was. R w NORTHWEST CORNER OF usmo ee TAYLOR Cl.PORTLAND,DR e1sjn aa caw- STRUCTURAL ENGINEERS Y` - E 0 A TIGARD,OREGON 91223 SW 68TH AVE.4 BEYELAND STREET 4,4,..E;. .m. Tw.C+o�n aim 6 E` 503/639-2639 FAX 503/639-2639 P1L(503)752-00I4 RAX.(503)251-16.32 2 2