The URL can be used to link to this page

SDR2002-00007 llE1AO1 EFIOdOMOJAT SNOI .L`dDINf1WIAiOD 2IV'II1ONID L0000ZOOflI US QHllIdXH NOTICE OF TYPE II DECISION SITE DEVELOPMENT REVIEW (SDR) 2002-00007 ADJUSTMENT (VAR) 2002-00017 CITY O TIIGARD CINGULAR COMMUNICATIONS MONOPOLE TOWER community lnevefopmen` S�iapingA Bettercommunity 120 DAYS = 9/17/2002 SECTION I. APPLICATION SUMMARY FILE NAME: CINGULAR COMMUNICATIONS MONOPOLE TOWER CASE NOS.: Site Development Review (SDR) SDR2002-00007 Adjustment (VAR) VAR2002-00017 PROPOSAL: The applicant is proposing to construct an 80-foot monopole tower. The associated accessory equipment will be placed within an existing storage unit. An adjustment has been requested seeking relief from the requirement that the wireless communication facility enclosure be screened by landscaping. APPLICANT: Salmon PcS, Inc. OWNER: SSC Property Holdings 123 NE 3� Ave, Suite 240 1155 Bailey Street, #440 Portland, OR 97232 Seattle, WA 98109 APPLICANT'S REP: Mericom Corporation Attn: Ed Fournier 25977 SW Canyon Creek Road, Suite E Wilsonville, OR 97070 LOCATION: 15700 SW Pacific Highway; WCTM 2S110DC, Tax Lot 00300. The subject site is located within the existing Shurgard Storage Center, north of Durham Road. ZONE: C-G: General Commercial District. The C-G zoning district is designed to accommodate a full range of retail, office and civic uses with a City- wide and even regional trade area; except where non-conforming, residential uses are limited to single-family residences which are located on the same site as a permitted use. A wide range of uses, including but not limited to adult entertainment, automotive equipment repair and storage, mini-warehouses, utilities, heliports, medical centers, major event entertainment, and gasoline stations, are permitted conditionally. APPLICABLE REVIEW CRITERIA: Community Development Code Chapters 18.370, 18.390, 18.520, 18.705, 18.730, 18.745, 18.765, 18.795 and 18.798. SECTION II. DECISION Notice is hereby given that the City of Tigard Community Development Director's designee has APPROVED the above request subject to certain conditions of approval. The findings and conclusions on which the decision is based are noted in Section VI. NOTICE OF TYPE II DECISION SDR2002-00007/CINGULAR COMMUNICATIONS MONOPOLE PAGE 1 OF 22 CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL THE FOLLOWING CONDITIONS SHALL BE SATISFIED PRIOR TO THE ISSUANCE OF SITE/BUILDING PERMITS: Submit to the Planning Division (Morgan Tracy, 503-639-4T71, ext. 2428) for review and approval: 1. The applicant/owner shall provide a revised site plan that shows the addition of two medium to large sized street trees (minimum 2" caliper size at planting) located to the south of the primary access driveway. Such street trees shall be installed prior to final building permit approval. 2. The applicant shall submit a revised elevation drawing indicating the color of the proposed monopole. Unless the applicant has been directed by the FAA, the color of the monopole shall be a non-reflective galvanized gray finish. 3. The applicant shall provide documentation regarding the noise levels in decibel ratings for the proposed air conditioninc units that shows the levels to be below 50 dBA (day)/40 dBA(night) measured at fie property line. 4. The applicant/owner shall provide satisfactory legal evidence, in the form of deeds, easements, leases or contracts to establish the joint access. 5. The applicant/owner shall certify that he/she agrees to ensure that the perimeter landscaping is maintained, and should the plants be irreparably damaged, removed, or die, the applicant/owner shall replace the plants in number and type with the largest commercially available similar species, a minimum of 12 feet in height. Submit to the Engineering Department (Brian Rager, 639-4171, ext. 2471) for review and approval: 6. Prior to issuance of a site permit, a public facility improvement permit will be required if any work is to occur in the public right-of-way. If no work within the right-of- way is necessary, this condition will not apply. 7. An erosion control plan shall be provided as part of the public improvement drawings. The plan shall conform to "Erosion Prevention and Sediment Control Plans - Technical Guidance Handbook, February 1994." THE FOLLOWING CONDITIONS SHALL BE SATISFIED PRIOR TO A FINAL BUILDING INSPECTION: Si=b, mit to the Engineering Department (Brian Rager, 639-4171, ext. 2471) for review and approval: 8. The applicant/owner shall follow the recommendations of the arborist report and maintain a minimum 8 feet separation between the trees and the utility excavation. 9. Prior to a final building inspection, the applicant shall complete any work in the public right-of-way (or public easement) and obtain approval from the Engineering Department. THIS APPROVAL SHALL BE VALID FOR EIGHTEEN (18) MONTHS FROM THE EFFECTIVE DATE OF THIS DECISION. SECTION III. BACKGROUND INFORMATION Site History: Staff conducted a search of City records for the subject property. A conditional use approval was granted in 1988 (Case File No. CU 88-09) for the Shurgard Storage mini warehouse use. Also, a sign permit and associate electrical permits were granted in 1997 for the freestanding sign on SW Pacific Highway. No other land use cases associated with this parcel were found. NOTICE OF TYPE II DECISION SDR2002-00007/CINGULAR COMMUNICATIONS MONOPOLE PAGE 2 OF 22 This parcel and surrounding properties to the north and south are zoned C-G with a planned development overlay. Properties to the east are zoned R-25 and are developed with multi- family units. To the west is King City with commercial properties fronting SW Pacific Highway. Vicinity Information: The subject site is located between Durham Road and Royalty Parkway, on the east side of SW Pacific Highway. Site Information and Proposal Description: The applicant is proposing to construct an 80-foot tall monopole tower for wireless communications service. The applicant has also requested an adjustment to the requirement that the perimeter of the tower enclosure be landscaped. SECTION IV. COMMENTS FROM PROPERTY OWNERS WITHIN 500 FEET One letter was received from a nearby property owner. This letter raises concerns about the aesthetic impacts of the tall tower structure, radio frequency interference, and the long-term viability of the existing landscaping around the site. RESPONSE: The wireless communication facility is an outright permitted use in the commercial zones. The code specifies several requirements to limit the impact of these facilities including a height limit of 100 feet for single carrier poles, requiring the pole be painted a dull gray finish to help blend the structure into the background sky, and a setback equal to the height of the tower from property lines. Staff concurs that there remain visual impacts from these facilities; however, these sites are part of what is becoming an essential service (mobile phones) and are necessary to deliver this service. Radio frequency interference issues are under the purview of the Federal Communications Commission. Local government is not empowered to regulate the frequency spectrum; however, should there be instances of interference, the FCC Enforcement Bureau is responsible for responding to such complaints. Contact: Federal Communications Commission; 11410 NE 122nd Way, Room 312; Kirkland, WA 98034-6927; phone 888-CALL- FCC (225-5322). Lastly, with regard to the landscaping, staff agrees that since the existing landscaping is a basis for approving the requested variance, that assurances for its long-term viability be shouldered by both the property owner, and the applicant. This is discussed in greater detail later in this decision. SECTION V. SUMMARY OF APPLICABLE REVIEW CRITERIA The proposal's consistency with these Code Chapters is reviewed in the following sections: A. Zoning Districts 18.530 (Industrial Zoning Districts) B. Applicable Development Code Standards 18.370 Variances and Adjustments) 18.705 Access Egress and Circulation) 18.745 Landscaping and Screening) 18.765 Off-Street parking and loading requirements) 18.780 Signs) 18.795 Visual Clearance) 18.798 Wireless Communication Facilities) C. Specific DR Approval Criteria 18.360 D. Street and Utility Improvement Standards 18.810 E. Impact Study 18.390 NOTICE OF TYPE II DECISION SDR2002-00007/CINGULAR COMMUNICATIONS MONOPOLE PAGE 3 OF 22 SECTION VI. APPLICABLE DEVELOPMENT CODE STANDARDS A. ZONIING DISTRICT Industrial Zoning District: Section 18.530.020 Lists the description of the Industrial Zoning Districts. The site is located in the C-G: General Commercial District. The proposed use, a Wireless Communications Facility, is permitted in this zone subject to the limitations of Chapter 18.798. Development Standards: Section 18.530.040.B States that Development standards in commercial zoning districts are contained in Table 18.520.2 below: TABLE 18.520.2 DEVELOPMENT STANDARDS IN INDUSTRIAL ZONES STANDARD C-G Proposed Minimum Lot Size None 203,860 sq. ft. - Detached unit - - Boarding, lodging, rooming house Minimum Lot Width 50 ft 246 ft. Minimum Setbacks - Front yard 0 ft. 25 ft. -Side facing street on corner&through lots - - -Side yard 0 ft [1] 20/35 ft. -Side or rear yard abutting more restrictive zoning district - - Rear yard 20 ft[1] 52 ft. - Distance between front of garage & property line abutting a public or - - private street. Maximum Height 45 ft 20 ft. Maximum Site Coverage[2] 85% 85 % Minimum Landscape Requirement 15% 15% [1]no setback shall be required except 20 feet shall be required where the zone abuts a residential zone. [2]includes all buildings and impervious area The site is comprised of storage buildings and the balance of the site is all paved, with the exception of an approximate 10-foot-wide area for perimeter landscaping around the sides and rear, and a large landscaped area in front. The proposal will not be adding any impervious area since the equipment will be placed inside the existing building and the monopole will be constructed on the existing asphalt. The setbacks to the wireless communication facility exceed those of the underlying zone, with the shortest distance to the property line being 133 feet. FINDING: Based on the analysis above, the underlying zone's development criteria have been satisfied. B. APPLICABLE DEVELOPMENT CODE STANDARDS The Site Development Review approval standards require that a development proposal be found to be consistent with the various standards of the Community Development Code. Variances and Adjustments (18.370): The applicant requested a variance to the landscaping requirements found in TDC Chapter 18.798.050.B.7. This standard requires that: a. Landscaping shall be placed outside the fence and shall consist of evergreen shrubs which reach six feet in height and 95% opacity within three years of planting; NOTICE OF TYPE II DECISION SDR2002-00007/CINGULAR COMMUNICATIONS MONOPOLE PAGE 4 OF 22 b. When adjacent to or within residentially-zoned property, free-standing towers and accessory equipment facilities shall be screened by the planting of a minimum of four evergreen trees at least 15 feet in height at the time of planting. The planting of said trees shall be prescribed in number by a plan prepared by a registered arborist in locations that (1) most effectively screen the wireless facilities from residential uses and (2) promote the future survival of the trees while limiting adverse effects of the trees on abutting properties. Existing evergreen trees at least 15 feet in height may be used to meet the screening requirement of this section if the arborist demonstrates that they provide screening for abutting residential uses. In order to grant relief from a requirement, the applicant must demonstrate that the criteria for a variance have been addressed. The criteria for a variance are as follows: a. The proposed variance will not be materially detrimental to the purposes of this title, to any other applicable policies and standards, and to other properties in the same zoning district or vicinity; To find that no detriment will occur by granting relief, it is important to understand the context of the requirement in relation to the specifics of the site. This code provision envisioned wireless communication facilities that would be normally viewable to the general public. The intent of the landscaping was not to obscure the tower, as that is nearly impossible, but to screen the accessory equipment and soften the tower's presence on the site. The current proposal includes housing the accessory equipment inside an existing storage unit, and running the cables out the side of the building and directly into the tower. The site, moreover, is semi private, with a keyed entry gate preventing general public access. Lastly, the entire site perimeter is currently landscaped to provide the general screening of the facility and soften the presence of the tower. This perimeter landscaping provides a better visual screen as it is both taller and closer to the off site viewer. b. There are special circumstances that exist which are peculiar to the lot size or shape, topography or other circumstances over which the applicant has no control, and which are not applicable to other properties in the same zoning district; The site is peculiar in three respects: it is not generally accessible to or viewable to the general public, the area where the tower is proposed is entirely covered in asphalt and buildings limiting the ability to place landscaping, and the existing site perimeter landscaping affords equal, if not better screening than what is otherwise required. The large size of the parcel, in conjunction with the proposed central location of the tower also sets this site apart from others in the district and helps to alleviate the need for the required landscaping. c. The use proposed will be the same as permitted under this title and City standards will be maintained to the greatest extent that is reasonably possible while permitting reasonable economic use of the land; The alleviation from the landscaping requirement will not affect general compliance with other relevant sections of the development code and other City Standards. Compliance with these standards is addressed in this decision. d. Existing physical and natural systems, such as but not limited to traffic, drainage, dramatic land forms or parks will not be adversely affected any more than would occur if the development were developed as specified in the title; and The omission of landscaping at the base of the proposed tower will not be noticeable to any persons beside those who are interior to the site, and are not otherwise obscured by the storage buildings on the property. On site traffic is not affected, drainage will continue to perform as previously designed, and there are no dramatic landforms or parks that would be adversely affected by the requested variance. e. The hardship is not self-imposed and the variance requested is the minimum variance which would alleviate the hardship. NOTICE OF TYPE II DECISION SDR2002-00007/CINGULAR COMMUNICATIONS MONOPOLE PAGE 5 OF 22 The hardship in this case can be characterized as the lack of available space around the tower enclosure to provide landscaping and accommodate vehicle access and circulation. Also, the relatively isolated location of the required landscaping creates difficulties for maintenance and long term continued care. The hardship is the result of previous development decisions made for the property with respect to building and driveway placement, as well as the requirement that the tower be setback a distance equal to its height. This prevents locating the tower near areas of existing landscaping and away from the expanse of asphalt. The applicant's request is the minimum practicable to alleviate the hardship FINDING: Based on the analysis provided above, the applicant's request meets the criteria for granting the variance. However, this finding is based on the resence of existing landscaping. To ensure the long-term continued presence of the existing landscape buffer, a condition shall be imposed. CONDITION: The applicant/owner shall ensure that the perimeter landscaping is maintained, and should the plants be irreparably damaged, removed, or die, the applicant/owner shall replace the plants in number and type with the largest commercially available similar species, a minimum of 12 feet in height. Access, Egress and Circulation (18.705): Access plan: No building or other permit shall be issued until scaled plans are presented and approved as provided by this chapter that show how access, egress and circulation requirements are to be fulfilled. The applicant shall submit a site plan. The Director shall provide the applicant with detailed information about this submission requirement. The applicant has provided scaled plans showing access, egress and circulation for the proposed monopole from SW Pacific Highway, which is a public street. Joint access: Owners of two or more uses, structures, or parcels of land may agree to utilize jointly the same access and egress when the combined access and egress of both uses, structures, or parcels of land satisfies the combined requirements as designated in this title, provided: Satisfactory legal evidence shall be presented in the form of deeds, easements, leases or contracts to establish the joint use; and copies of the deeds, easements, leases or contracts are placed on permanent file with the City. The applicant has proposed to utilize the existing site access and jointly share the driveway to the wireless communication facility site. An access easement will be required. Public street access: All vehicular access and egress as required in Sections 18.705.030H and 18.705.0301 shall connect directly with a public or private street approved by the City for public use and shall be maintained at the required standards on a continuous basis. The subject site is accessible from SW Pacific Highway, an improved public street that meets standards for public streets. Curb cuts: Curb cuts shall be in accordance with Section 18.810.030N: Concrete curbs, curb cuts, wheelchair, bicycle ramps and driveway approaches shall be constructed in accordance with standards specified in this chapter and Section 15.04.080: Concrete curbs and driveway approaches are required; ewhere no sidewalk is planned, an asphalt approach may be constructed with City except Engineer approval and Asphalt and concrete driveway approaches to the property line shall be built to City configuration standards. The applicant proposes to utilize the existing curb cut and driveway apron, which conform to city standards. NOTICE OF TYPE II DECISION SDR2002-00007/CINGULAR COMMUNICATIONS MONOPOLE PAGE 6 OF 22 Walkways: On-site pedestrian walkways shall comply with the following standards: Walkways shall extend from the ground floor entrances or from the ground floor landing of stairs, ramps, or elevators of all commercial, institutional, and industrial uses, to the streets which provide the required access and egress. Walkways shall provide convenient connections between buildings in multi-building commercial, institutional, and industrial complexes. Unless impractical, walkways shall be constructed between new and existing developments and neighboring developments; The proposed facility is a non-inhabited structure and will be fenced off separately from the rest of the site for security purposes. A walkway connects the storage unit's main office to the sidewalks on the street. Existing rights-of-way provide adequate pedestrian access to the site. Wherever required walkways cross vehicle access driveways or parking lots, such crossings shall be designed and located for pedestrian safety. Required walkways shall be physically separated from motor vehicle traffic and parking by either a minimum 6-inch vertical separation (curbed) or a minimum 3-foot horizontal separation, except that pedestrian crossings of traffic aisles are permitted for distances no greater than 36 feet if appropriate landscaping, pavement markings, or contrasting pavement materials are used. Walkways shall be a minimum of four feet in width, exclusive of vehicle overhangs and obstructions such as mailboxes, benches, bicycle racks, and sign posts, and shall be in compliance with ADA standards; There are no walkways proposed, therefore, this standard is met. Required walkways shall be paved with hard surfaced materials such as concrete, asphalt, stone, brick, etc. Walkways may be required to be lighted and/or signed as needed for safety purposes. Soft-surfaced public use pathways may be provided only if such pathways are provided in addition to required pathways. There are no walkways proposed, therefore, this standard is met. Minimum Access Requirements for Commercial and Industrial Use: Section 18.705.030.1 provides the minimum access requirements for commercial and industrial uses: Table 18.705.3 indicates that the required access width for developments with 0-99 parking spaces is one 30-foot accesses with 24 feet of pavement. Vehicular access shall be provided to commercial or industrial uses, and shall be located within 50 feet of the primary ground floor entrances; additional requirements for truck traffic may be placed as conditions of site development review. The site has its primary access from SW Pacific Highway which is greater than 30 feet wide with more than 24 feet of pavement. The proposed development will not affect any change to the existing primary access point, which is in conformance with the code. The secondary access to SW Pacific Highway is 24 feet wide, but will not be used for access to the cell site, it is for emergency access only. One-way vehicular access points: Where a proposed parking facility indicates only one-way traffic flow on the site, it shall be accommodated by a specific driveway serving the facility; the entrance drive shall be situated closest to oncoming traffic and the exit drive shall be situated farthest from oncoming traffic. The existing primary access accommodates two-way traffic The Director has the authority to restrict access when the need to do so is dictated by one or more of the following conditions: NOTICE OF TYPE II DECISION SDR2002-00007/CINGULAR COMMUNICATIONS MONOPOLE PAGE 7 OF 22 To provide for increased traffic movement on congested streets and to eliminate turning movement problems, the Director may restrict the location of driveways on streets and require the location of driveways be placed on adjacent streets, upon the finding that the proposed access would: • Cause or increase existing hazardous traffic conditions; or • Provide inadequate access for emergency vehicles; or • Cause hazardous conditions to exist-which would constitute a clear and present danger to the public health, safety, and general welfare. To eliminate the need to use public streets for movements between commercial or industrial properties, parking areas shall be designed to connect with parking areas on adjacent properties unless not feasible. The Director shall require access easements between properties where necessary to provide for parking area connections; To facilitate pedestrian and bicycle traffic, access and parking area plans shall provide efficient sidewalk and/or pathway connections, as feasible, between neighboring developments or land uses; The existing access meets present City standards and affords good visibility in both directions of SW Pacific Highway. The subject site has a very small parking area near the front office (off SW Pacific Highway) outside the security fence. The site is surrounded by a chain link fence for security purposes. The proposed cell tower will be surrounded by a second fence for additional security. It is impractical to connect, either with a pedestrian or vehicular connection, other adjacent properties. FINDING: Based on the analysis above, the Access, Egress and Circulation standards have not been fully met, however by imposing the following condition, these standards will be satisfied. CONDITION: The applicant/owner shall provide satisfactory legal evidence, in the form of deeds, easements, leases or contracts to establish the joint access. Environmental Performance Standards (18.725) The purpose of these provisions is to apply the federal and state environmental laws, rules and regulations to development within the City of Tigard. These requirements are intended to prevent or mitigate for adverse environmental impacts to offsite properties from noise, visible emissions, vibration, odors, insects and rodents, and glare and heat. The proposed wireless communication facility will have the mechanical equipment housed within the adjacent storage unit, limiting potential noise. The use does not generate trash, sewage, wastewater, vibration, odors, or visible emissions. As there will be no trash accumulation, there should be no harboring of insects or rodents. The dull galvanized color will minimize glare. FINDING: Based on the analysis above, and continued obligation of the property owner to adhere to these provisions, this standard is met. Landscaping and Screening (18.745): Street Trees: Section 18.745.040 states that all development projects fronting on a public street or a private drive more than 100 feet in length shall be required to plant street trees in accordance with Section 18.745.040.0 Section 18.745.040.0 requires that street trees be spaced between 20 and 40 feet apart depending on the size classification of the tree at maturity (small, medium or large). This development fronts a public street and is, therefore, required to have street trees. There are two trees along the public right-of-way that serve as street trees, however, the site is deficient in the number of street trees provided. The applicant will need to submit a site plan showing the addition of two trees along the public street frontage. The trees should be medium to large size species, similar to the existing street trees to the north. NOTICE OF TYPE II DECISION SDR2002-00007/CINGULAR COMMUNICATIONS MONOPOLE PAGE 8 OF 22 FINDING: The applicant's plans do not meet the requirement for street trees. CONDITION:The applicant/owner shall provide a revised site plan that shows the addition of two medium to large sized street trees (minimum 2" caliper size at planting) located to the south of the primary access driveway. Such street trees shall be installed prior to final building permit approval. Buffering and Screening: Section 18.745.050 states that buffering, but not screening is required between abutting uses that are of a different type when the uses are separated by a street. No buffer or screening is required between similar uses. The proposed use is located centrally within the commercial property. As such, no buffering and screening is required as the parent parcel and the applicant's proposed use are similar. Buffering exists between the storage site and the multi-family residential properties to the east and southeast. Screening: Special Provisions: Section 18.745.050.E requires the screening of parking and loading areas. Landscaped parking areas shall include special design features which effectively screen the parking lot areas from view. Planting materials to be installed should achieve a relative balance between low lying and vertical shrubbery and trees. Trees shall be planted in landscaped islands in all parking areas, and shall be equally distributed on the basis of one (1) tree for each seven (7) parking spaces in order to provide a canopy effect. The minimum dimension on the landscape islands shall be three (3) feet wide and the landscaping shall be protected from vehicular damage by some form of wheel guard or curb. The proposed use does not require additional parking. There is no current screening provided for the existing parking lot, as it was developed prior To the implementation of this requirement. Since no changes to the parking area are proposed or required, no additional screening will be required for this nonconforming aspect of the parking area. Screening Of Service Facilities. Except for one-family and two-family dwellings, any refuse container or disposal area and service facilities such as gas meters and air conditioners which would otherwise be visible from a public street, customer or resident parking area, any public facility or any residential area shall be screened from view by placement of a solid wood fence or masonry wall between five and eight feet in height. All refuse materials shall be contained within the screened area; Service facilities are not needed for the proposed use, and have not been proposed. FINDING: Based on the analysis above, the landscaping and screening standards of this section have been met. Mixed Solid Waste and Recyclables Storage (18.755): Chapter 18.755 requires that new construction incorporates functional and adequate space for on-site storage and efficient collection of mixed solid waste and source separated Recyclables prior to pick-up and removal by haulers. The applicant must choose one (1) of the following four (4) methods to demonstrate compliance: Minimum Standard, Waste Assessment, Comprehensive Recycling Plan, or Franchised Hauler Review and Sign-Off. The applicant will have to submit evidence or a plan which indicates compliance with this section. Regardless of which method chosen, the applicant will have to submit a written sign-off from the franchise hauler regarding the facility location and compatibility. No mixed solid waste collection or recyclables storage is needed for this use. No changes to the site's existing refuse collection area are proposed. NOTICE OF TYPE II DECISION SDR2002-00007/CINGULAR COMMUNICATIONS MONOPOLE PAGE 9 OF 22 Location Standards. To encourage its use, the storage area for source-separated recyclable shall be co- located with the storage area for residual mixed solid waste; Indoor and outdoor storage areas shall comply with Uniform Building and Fire Code requirements; Storage area space requirements can be satisfied with a single location or multiple locations, and can combine both interior and exterior locations; Exterior storage areas can be located within interior side yard or rear yard areas. Exterior storage areas shall not be located within a required front yard setback or in a yard adjacent to a public or private street; Exterior storage areas shall be located in central and visible locations on a site to enhance security for users; Exterior storage areas can be located in a parking.area if the proposed use provides at least the minimum number of parking spaces required for the use after deducting the area used for storage. Storage areas shall be appropriately screened according to the provisions in 18.755.050 C, design standards; The storage area shall be accessible for collection vehicles and located so that the storage area will not obstruct pedestrian or vehicle traffic movement on the site or on public streets adjacent to the site. No mixed solid waste collection or recyclables storage is needed for this use. Therefore, this standard is met. Design Standards. The dimensions of the storage area shall accommodate containers consistent with current methods of local collection; Storage containers shall meet Uniform Fire Code standards and be made and covered with waterproof materials or situated in a covered area; Exterior storage areas shall be enclosed by a sight-obscuring fence wall, or hedge at least six feet in height. Gate openings which allow access to users and haulers shall be provided. Gate openings for haulers shall be a minimum of 10 feet wide and shall be capable of being secured in a closed and open position; Storage area(s) and containers shall be clearly labeled to indicate the type of materials accepted. No mixed solid waste collection or recyclables storage is needed for this use. Therefore, this standard is met. FINDING: Based on the analysis above, the Mixed Solid Waste & Recyclables Storage Standards have been met. Off-Street Parking and Loading (18.765): Location of vehicle parking: Off-street arking spaces for single-family and duplex dwellings and single-family attached dwellings shall be located on the same lot with the dwellings. Off-street parking lots for uses not listed above shall be located not further than 200 feet from the building or use that they are required to serve, measured in a straight line from the building with the following exceptions: a) commercial and industrial uses which require more than 40 parking spaces may provide for the spaces in excess of the required first 40 spaces up.to a distance of 300 feet from the primary site; The 40 parking spaces which remain on the primary site must be available for users in the following order of priority: 1) Disabled-accessible spaces; 2) Short-term spaces; 3) Long-term preferential carpool and vanpool spaces; 4) Long-term spaces. No parking is required for the proposed use. Therefore, this standard is met. Joint Parking_ Owners of two or more uses, structures or parcels of land may agree to utilize jointly the same parking and loading spaces when the peak hours of operation do not overlay, subject to the following: 1) The size of the joint parking facility shall be at least as large as the number of vehicle parking spaces required by the larger(est) use per Section 18.765.070; 2) Satisfactory legal evidence shall be presented to the Director in the form of deeds, leases or contracts to establish the joint use; 3) If a joint use arrangement is subsequently terminated, or if the uses change, the requirements of this title thereafter apply to each separately. NOTICE OF TYPE II DECISION SDR2002-00007/CINGULAR COMMUNICATIONS MONOPOLE PAGE 10 OF 22 Joint parking is not proposed with this application. Therefore, this standard does not apply. Parking in Mixed-Use Projects: In mixed-use projects, the required minimum vehicle parking shall be determined using the following formula. 1) Primary use, i.e., that with the largest proportion of total floor area within the development, at 100% of the minimum vehicle parking required for that use in Section 18.765.060; 2) Secondary use, i.e., that with the second largest percentage of total floor area within the develo ment, at 90% of the k g vehicle parking required require for that use in Section 18.765.060; 3 Subsequent use or uses, at 80% of the vehicle parking required for that use(s) in ection 18.765.060; 4) The maximum parking allowance shall be 150% of the total minimum parking as calculated in D.1.-3. above. The project is not considered a mixed-use project. Therefore, this standard does not apply. Visitor Parking in Multi-Family Residential Developments: Multi-dwelling units with more than 10 required parking spaces shall provide an additional 15% of vehicle parking spaces above the minimum required for the use of guests of residents of the complex. These spaces shall be centrally located or distributed throughout the development. Required bicycle parking facilities shall also be centrally located within or evenly distributed throughout the development. This project does not involve a residential use. Therefore, this standard does not apply. Preferential Long-Term CarpoolNanpool Parking: Parking lots providing in excess of 20 long-term parking spaces shall provide preferential long-term carpool and vanpool parking for employees, students and other regular visitors to the site. At least 5% of total long-term parking spaces shall be reserved for carpool/vanpool use. Preferential parking for carpools/vanpools shall be closer to the main entrances of the building than any other employee or student parking except parking spaces designated for use by the disabled. Preferential carpool/vanpool spaces shall be full-sized per requirements in Section 18.765.040N and shall be clearly designated for use only by carpools and vanpools between 7:00 AM and 5:30 PM Monday through Friday. No parking is required for the proposed use. Therefore, no carpool/vanpool stalls are required. Disabled-Accessible Parking: All parking areas shall be provided with the required number of parking spaces for disabled persons as specified by the State of Oregon Uniform Building Code and federal standards. Such parking spaces shall be sized, signed and marked-as required by these regulations. No parking is required for the proposed use. The facility is not intended for public access and is, therefore, exempt from ADA accessibility requirements. Therefore, this standard has been met. Access Drives: With regard to access to public streets from off-street parking: access drives from the street to off-street parking or loading areas shall be designed and constructed to facilitate the flow of traffic and provide maximum safety for pedestrian and vehicular traffic on the site; the number and size of access drives shall be in accordance with the requirements of Chapter, 18.705, Access, Egress and Circulation; access drives shall be clearly and permanently marked and defined through use of rails, fences, walls or other barriers or markers on frontage not occupied by service drives; access drives shall have a minimum vision clearance in accordance with Chapter 18.795, Visual Clearance; access drives shall be improved with an asphalt or concrete surface; and excluding single-family and duplex residences, except as provided by Subsection 18.810.030.P, groups of two or more parking spaces shall be served by a service drive so that no backing movements or other maneuvering within a street or other public right-of-way will be required. NOTICE OF TYPE II DECISION SDR2002-00007/CINGULAR COMMUNICATIONS MONOPOLE PAGE 11 OF 22 No changes to the primary access are proposed. Pedestrian Access: Pedestrian access through parking lots shall be provided in accordance with Section 18.705.030.F. Where a parking area or other vehicle area has a drop-off grade separation, the property owner shall install a wall, railing, or other barrier which will prevent a slow-moving vehicle or driverless vehicle from escaping such area and which will prevent pedestrians from walking over drop-off edges. There are no changes proposed to the parking and there are no pedestrian destinations that would necessitate pedestrian access from the parking lot. Parking Lot Striping: Except for single-family and duplex residences, any area intended to be used to meet the off-street parking requirements as contained in this Chapter shall have all parking spaces clearly marked; and all interior drives and access aisles shall be clearly marked and signed to show direction of flow and maintain vehicular and pedestrian safety. There are no changes proposed to the parking area and no parking is required for the proposed use. Therefore, this standard has been met. Wheel Stops: Parking spaces along the boundaries of a parking lot or adjacent to interior landscaped areas or sidewalks shall be provided with a wheel stop at least four inches high located three feet back from the front of the parking stall. The front three feet of the parking stall may be concrete, asphalt or low lying landscape material that does not exceed the height of the wheel stop. This area cannot be calculated to meet landscaping or sidewalk requirements. There are no changes proposed to the parking area and no parking is required for the proposed use. Therefore, this standard has been met. Space and Aisle Dimensions: Section 18.765.040.N states that: "except as modified for angled parking in Figures 18.765.1 and 18.765.2 the minimum dimensions for parking spaces are: 8.5 feet x 18.5 feet for a standard space and 7.5 feet x 16.5 feet for a compact space; aisles accommodating two direction traffic, or allowing access from both ends, shall be 24 feet in width. There are no changes proposed to the parking area and no parking is required for the proposed use. Therefore, this standard has been met. Bicycle Parking Location and Access: Section 18.765.050 states bicycle parking areas shall be provided at locations within 50 feet of primary entrances to structures; bicycle parking areas shall not be located within parking aisles, landscape areas or pedestrian ways; outdoor bicycle parking shall be visible from on-site buildings and/or the street. When the bicycle parking area is not visible from the street, directional signs shall be used to locate the parking area; and bicycle parking may be located inside a building on a floor which has an outdoor entrance open for use and floor location which does not require the bicyclist to use stairs to gain access to the space. Exceptions may be made to the latter requirement for parking on upper stories within a multi-story residential building. There are no changes proposed to the parking area and no bicycle parking is required for the proposed use. Therefore, this standard has been met. It should be noted that the self storage use is nonconforming with respect to bicycle parking, but as this proposal does not increase the degree of the nonconformity (such as creating additional storage units) and the proposed use does not require bicycle spaces, no bicycle parking will be required. NOTICE OF TYPE II DECISION SDR2002-00007/CINGULAR COMMUNICATIONS MONOPOLE PAGE 12 OF 22 Bicycle Parking Design Requirements: Section 18.765.050.C. The following design requirements apply to the installation of bicycle racks: The racks required for required bicycle parking spaces shall ensure that bicycles may be securely locked to them without undue inconvenience. Provision of bicycle lockers for long-term (employee) parking is encouraged but not required; bicycle racks must be securely anchored to the ground, wall or other structure; bicycle parking spaces shall be at least 21/2 feet by six feet long, and, when covered, with a vertical clearance of seven feet. An access aisle of at least five feet wide shall be provided and maintained beside or between each row of bicycle parking; each required bicycle parking space must be accessible without moving another bicycle; required bicycle parking spaces may not be rented or leased except where required motor vehicle parking is rented or leased. At-cost or deposit fees for bicycle parking are exempt from this requirement; and areas set aside for required bicycle parking must be clearly reserved for bicycle parking only. Outdoor bicycle parking facilities shall be surfaced with a hard surfaced material, i.e., pavers, asphalt, concrete or similar material. This surface must be designed to remain well drained. There are no changes proposed to the parking area and no bicycle parking is required for the proposed use. Therefore, this standard has been met. Minimum Bicycle Parking Requirements: The total number of required bicycle parking spaces for each use is specified in Table 18.765.2 in Section 18.765.070.H. In no case shall there be less than two bicycle parking spaces. As discussed above, according to Table 18.765.2 of the Tigard Development Code, the minimum bicycle-parking requirement for a Wireless Communication Facility is zero spaces. Minimum Off-Street Parking: Section 18.765.070.H states that the minimum and maximum parking shall be as required in Table 18.765.2. Table 18.765.2 states that the minimum parking for a Wireless Communication Facility is zero spaces. Therefore, this standard is satisfied. Off-Street Loading Spaces: Commercial, industrial and institutional buildings or structures to be built or altered which receive and distribute material or merchandise by truck shall provide and maintain off-street loading and maneuvering space as follows: A minimum of one loading space is required for buildings with 10,000 gross square feet or more; A minimum of two loading spaces for buildings with 40,000 gross square feet or more. The proposed wireless communication facility will occupy two existing storage units, no new additional building square footage is being added, therefore this standard does not apply to the applicant's proposal. FINDING: Based on the above analysis, the off-street parking and loading standards have been met. Signs (18.780): Chapter 18.780.130.D lists the type of allowable signs and sign area permitted in the I-P Zoning District. The proposed plans do not call for any signage. Based on this, this standard is met. FINDING: This standard is met, since the applicant has not proposed any signs. NOTICE OF TYPE II DECISION SDR2002-00007/CINGULAR COMMUNICATIONS MONOPOLE PAGE 13 OF 22 Tree Removal (18.790): Section 18.790.030 requires that a tree plan for the planting, removal and protection of trees prepared by a certified arborist shall be provided with a site development review application. The tree plan shall include identification of all existing trees, identification of a program to save existing trees or mitigate tree removal over 12 inches in caliper, which trees are to be removed, protection program defining standards and methods that will be used by the applicant to protect trees during and after construction. There are a number of trees along the site's north property line that serve as buffering and screening for the mini storage use. The applicant's initial plans showed undergrounding the power and telephone utilities from SW Pacific Highway to the wireless communications facility directly adjacent to the buffer trees. The applicant included a certified arborist assessment and tree protection plan that recommends that the excavation occur no closer than 8 feet from the base of the trees. By following the arborist's recommendation, this standard will be met. FINDING: By following the recommendations of the arborist's tree protection plan, the trees on site should not be impacted. CONDITION: The applicant/owner shall follow the recommendations of the arborist report and maintain a minimum 8-foot separation between the trees and the excavation. Visual Clearance Areas (18.795): Chapter 18.795 requires that a clear vision area shall be maintained on the corners of all property adjacent to intersecting right-of-ways or the intersection of a public street and a private driveway. A clear vision area shalt contain no vehicle, hedge planting, fence, wall structure, or-temporary or permanent obstruction exceeding three (3) feet in height. The code provides that obstructions that may.be located in this area shall be visually clear between three (3) and eight (8) feet in height (8) (trees may be placed within this area provided that all ranches below eight (8) feet are removed). A visual clearance area is the triangular area formed by measuring a 30-foot distance along the street right- of-way and the driveway, and then connecting these two (2), 30-foot distance points with a straight line. The primary access to this property is from SW Pacific Highway. The vision clearance areas are shown on the applicants site plan. Pictures submitted by the applicant confirm that there are no visual obstacles at the site's access entry. FINDING: The Visual Clearance Standards have been met. Wireless Communication Facilities (18.798): Chapter 18.798 allows wireless communication facilities in commercial zones, the I-P zone and public rights of way, subject to a Site Development Review process, provided they satisfy the specific criteria outlined in this chapter and are setback from any offsite residence a distance equal to the height of the tower. Aesthetic: New towers shall maintain a non-reflective gray finish or, if required by the FAA, be painted pursuant to the FAA's requirements; if collocation on an existing is requested, the design of any antenna(s), accessory structures or equipment shall, to the extent possible, use materials, colors and textures that will match the existing tower or non-tower structure to which the equipment of the collocating provider is being attached; if collocation on an existing non-tower structure is requested, the anfenna(s) and supporting electrical and mechanical equipment shall be a neutral color that is the same as the color as the supporting structure so as to make the antenna(s) and related equipment as visually unobtrusive as possible. The proposed facility is not a collocation. The applicant has not indicated what color the tower will be, nor has the applicant provided information from FAA to determine whether additional flight safety marking will be required. NOTICE OF TYPE II DECISION SDR2002-00007/CINGULAR COMMUNICATIONS MONOPOLE PAGE 14 OF 22 Setbacks: Towers designed to collapse within themselves shall be set back in accordance with the setbacks contained in the base zone; towers not designed to collapse within themselves shall be set back from the property line by a distance equal to the height of the tower. The applicant has proposed to locate the 100-foot tower no closer than 133 feet to any property line in compliance with this requirement. Tower spacing: No new tower shall be allowed within 500 feet of an existing tower. The nearest existing tower is approximately 11/4 miles to the east. Tower height: No tower shall exceed 100 feet for a single user or 125 feet for multiple users; The proposed tower is for a single user, and will be 80 feet. The antennae will be mounted at the top of the tower and will extend another 4 feet above the tower. Lighting: No lighting shall be permitted on a tower except as required by the FAA; No lighting has been proposed on the tower. Fencing and security: For security purposes, towers and ancillary facilities shall be enclosed by a minimum six-foot fence; The proposed facility will be enclosed by a six-foot chain link fence, the equipment will be wholly enclosed within the existing storage units. Landscaping and screening: Landscaping shall be placed outside the fence and shall consist of evergreen shrubs which reach six feet in height and 95% opacity within three years of planting; when adjacent to or within residentially-zoned property, free- standing towers and accessory equipment facilities shall be screened by the planting of a minimum of four evergreen trees at least 15 feet in height at the time of planting. The proposed tower is not within a residential zone. The applicant has requested a variance to this landscape standard, as addressed previously in this decision. By approving the variance, this standard is met. Noise: Noise-generating equipment shall be sound-buffered by means of baffling, barriers or other suitable means to reduce the sound level measured at the property line to 50 dBA (day)/40 dBA (night) when adjacent to a noise-sensitive land use and 75 dBA (day)/60 dBA (night) when adjacent to other uses. The mechanical equipment will be housed and completely enclosed within the storage units. The only external sounds anticipated would be from the air conditioning unit. The property is adjacent to multi-family units (noise sensitive uses), and thus a maximum 50 dBA (day)/40 dBA (night). Additional information as to the noise rating for the air conditioning units is needed to confirm whether or not they will comply with the thresholds set. FINDING: Based on the analysis above, staff cannot determine whether the specific requirements for wireless facilities have been satisfied. However, with the imposition of the following conditions, these standards can be met. CONDITIONS: Unless the applicant has been otherwise directed by the FAA, the color of the monopole shall be a non-reflective galvanized gray finish. The applicant shall provide documentation regarding the noise levels in decibel ratings for the proposed air conditioning units that shows the levels to be below 50 dBA (day)/40 dBA(night) measured at the property line. NOTICE OF TYPE II DECISION SDR2002-00007/CINGULAR COMMUNICATIONS MONOPOLE PAGE 15 OF 22 C. SPECIFIC SITE DEVELOPMENT REVIEW APPROVAL STANDARDS Section 18.360.090(A)(2) through 18.360.090(A)(15) provides additional Site Development Review approval standards not necessarily covered by the rovisions of the previously listed sections. These additional standards are addressed immediately below with the following exceptions: The proposal contains no elements related to the provisions of the following and are, therefore, found to be inapplicable as approval standards: 18.360.090.3 (Exterior Elevations); 18.360.090.5 (Privacy and Noise: Multi-family or Group Living Uses); 18.360.090.6 (Private Outdoor Areas: Multi-family Use); 18.360.090.7 (Shared Outdoor Recreation Areas: Multi-family Use); 18.360.090.8 (100-year floodplain); and 18.360.090.9 (Demarcation of Spaces). The following sections were discussed previously in this decision and, therefore, will not be addressed in this section: 18.360.090.4 (Buffering, Screening and Compatibility Between Adjoining Uses); 18.360.090.13 Parking); 18.360.090.14 (Landscaping); 18.360.090.15 (Drainage); and 18.360.090.14 (Provisions for the Disabled). Relationship to the Natural and Physical Environment: Buildings shall be: located to preserve existing trees, topography and natural drainage where possible based u on existing site conditions; located in areas not subject to ground slumping or sliding; located to provide adequate distance between adjoining buildings for adequate light, air circulation, and fire-fighting; and oriented with consideration for sun and wind. Trees shall be preserved to the extent possible. Replacement of trees is subject to the requirements of Chapter 18.790, Tree Removal. The proposed wireless communication facility site is located on existing asphalt, in a flat area of the property. No tree removal, land grading, or drainage alteration is required to accommodate the proposed development. Suitable separation is provided between the proposed equipment shelter and any other buildings on or off site, which is adequate for light and air circulation. Crime Prevention and Safety: • Windows shall be located so that areas vulnerable to crime can be surveyed by the occupants; • Interior laundry and service areas shall be located in a way that they can be observed by others; • Mail boxes shall be located in lighted areas having vehicular or pedestrian traffic; • The exterior lighting levels shall be selected and the angles shall be oriented towards areas vulnerable to crime; and • Light fixtures shall be provided in areas having heavy pedestrian or vehicular traffic and in potentially dangerous areas such as parking lots, stairs, ramps and abrupt grade changes. Fixtures shall be placed at a height so that light patterns overlap at a height of seven feet, which is sufficient to illuminate a person. The un-staffed status of the site necessitates added security. Chain link fencing is proposed to surround the monopole. Radio cabinets will be placed inside the mini storage units. There is existing security lighting for the mini storage complex. Therefore, this criterion has been met. Public Transit: Provisions within the plan shall be included to provide for transit if the development proposal is adjacent to existing or proposed transit route; the requirements for transit facilities shall be based on: the location of other transit facilities in the area; and the size and type of the proposal. The following facilities may be required after City and Tri-Met review: bus stop shelters; turnouts for buses; and connecting paths to the shelters. NOTICE OF TYPE II DECISION SDR2002-00007/CINGULAR COMMUNICATIONS MONOPOLE PAGE 16 OF 22 The site has frontage on SW Pacific Highway. While SW Pacific Highway has a bus route, the proposed development is un-staffed and, therefore, does not generate potential ridership. Therefore, this standard does not apply. Provisions of the Underlying Zone: All of the provisions and regulations of the underlying zone shall apply unless modified by other sections or this title, e.g., Planned Developments, Chapter 18.350; or a variance or adjustment granted under Chapter 18.370. Dimensional Requirements: Provisions of the (C-G) General Commercial Zoning District have been addressed earlier in this decision under Section 18.520.040.B. FINDING: Based on the analysis above, the specific standards of the Site Development Review Section have been met. D. Street And Utility Improvements Standards (Section 18.810): Chapter 18.810 provides construction standards for the implementation of public and private facilities and utilities such as streets, sewers, and drainage. The applicable standards are addressed below: Streets: Improvements: Section 18.810.030.A.1 states that streets within a development and streets adjacent shall be improved in accordance with the TDC standards. Section 18.810.030.A.2 states that any new street or additional street width planned as a Portion of an existing street shall be dedicated and improved in accordance with the TDC. This site lies adjacent to SW Pacific Highway, which is classified as a Principal Arterial in the City of Tigard Transportation System Plan. At present, there is approximately 175 feet of total ROW, according to the most recent tax assessor's map. This right-of-way is adequate to meet the TSP planned right-of-way width. Sidewalks: Section 18.810.070.A requires that sidewalks be constructed to meet City design standards and be located on both sides of arterial, collector and local residential streets. There are existing sidewalks along the site's frontage. Sanitary Sewers: Sewers Required: Section 18.810.090.A requires that sanitary sewer be installed to serve each new development and to connect developments to existing mains in accordance with the provisions set forth in Design and Construction Standards for Sanitary and Surface Water Management (as adopted by Clean Water Services in 1996 and including any future revisions or amendments) and the adopted policies of the comprehensive plan. Over-sizing: Section 18.810.090.0 states that proposed sewer systems shall include consideration of additional development within the area as projected by the Comprehensive Plan. There is an existing 8-inch public sewer main located in SW Pacific Highway. The existing structure is already served by this main line. The proposed use does not require sewer service, so no additional public sewer line work is necessary for this development. NOTICE OF TYPE II DECISION SDR2002-00007/CINGULAR COMMUNICATIONS MONOPOLE PAGE 17 OF 22 Storm Drainage: General Provisions: Section 18.810.100.A states requires developers to make adequate provisions for storm water and flood water runoff. Accommodation of Upstream Drainage: Section 18.810.100.0 states that a culvert or other drainage facility shall be large enough to accommodate potential runoff from its entire upstream drainage area, whether inside or outside the development. The City Engineer shall approve the necessary size of the facility, based on the provisions of Design and Construction Standards for Sanitary and Surface Water Management (as adopted by Clean Water Services in 2000 and including any future revisions or amendments). The topography of this is very flat and is served by an internal system of surface drains. These drains discharge into the storm system in SW Pacific Highway. The applicant's onsite storm drainage plan will collect any surface water that would impact this site and convey it to the public system in SW Pacific Highway. Effect on Downstream Drainage: Section 18.810.100.D states that where it is anticipated by the City Engineer that the additional runoff resulting from the development will overload an existing drainage facility, the Director and Engineer shall withhold approval of the development until provisions have been made for improvement of the potential condition or until provisions have been made for storage of additional runoff caused by the development in accordance with the Design and Construction Standards for Sanitary and Surface Water Management (as adopted by Clean Water Services in 2000 and including any future revisions or amendments). CWS design standards provide that if the impervious area of a site is not increased over 5,000 square feet, then onsite detention is not required. There is no net increase in impervious area resulting from this proposal. Therefore, on-site detention is not required for this project. Bikeways and Pedestrian Pathways: Bikeway Extension: Section 18.810.110.A states that developments adjoining proposed bikeways identified on the City's adopted pedestrian/bikeway plan shall include provisions for the future extension of such bikeways through the dedication of easements or right-of-way. No bikeways are associated with this project. Therefore, this criterion does not apply. Cost of Construction: Section 18.810.110.B states that development permits issued for planned unit developments, conditional use permits, subdivisions, and other developments which will principally benefit from such bikeways shall be conditioned to include the cost or construction of bikeway improvements. No bikeways are associated with this project. Therefore, this criterion does not apply. Minimum Width: Section 18.810.110.0 states that the minimum width for bikeways within the roadway is five feet per bicycle travel lane. Minimum width for two-way bikeways separated from the road is eight feet. No bikeways are associated with this project. Therefore, this criterion does not apply. Utilities: Section 18.810.120 states that all utility lines, but not limited to those required for electric, communication, lighting and cable television services and related facilities shall be placed underground, except for surface mounted transformers, surface mounted connection boxes and meter cabinets which may be placed above ground, temporary utility service facilities during construction, high capacity electric lines operating at 50,000 volts or above, and: NOTICE OF TYPE II DECISION SDR2002-00007/CINGULAR COMMUNICATIONS MONOPOLE PAGE 18 OF 22 • The developer shall make all necessary arrangements with the serving utility to provide the underground services; • The City reserves the right to approve location of all surface mounted facilities; • All underground utilities, including sanitary sewers and storm drains installed in streets by the developer, shall be constructed prior to the surfacing of the streets; and • Stubs for service connections shall be long enough to avoid disturbing the street improvements when service connections are made. Exception to Under-Grounding Requirement: Section 18.810.120.0 states that a developer shall pay a fee in-lieu of under-grounding costs when the development is proposed to take place on a street where existing utilities which are not underground will serve the development and the approval authority determines that the cost and technical difficulty of under-grounding the utilities outweighs the benefit of under- grounding in conjunction with the development. The determination shall be on a case- by-case basis. The most common, but not the only, such situation is a short frontage development for which under-grounding would result in the placement of additional poles, rather than the removal of above-ground utilities facilities. An applicant for a development which is served by utilities which are not underground and which are located across a public right-of-way from the applicant's property shall pay a fee in-lieu of under-grounding. There are existing overhead utility lines along both sides of SW Pacific Highway. According to the Engineering Department, the lines that front this site are high power lines, and are therefore exempt from this undergrounding requirement. All service utilities to the development shall be installed underground however. ADDITIONAL CITY AND/OR AGENCY CONCERNS WITH STREET AND UTILITY IMPROVEMENT STANDARDS: Public Water System: This site is located in the Tualatin Valley Water District (TVWD) service area. Storm Water Quality: The City has agreed to enforce Surface Water Management (SWM) regulations established by Clean Water Services (CWS) Design and Construction Standards (adopted by Resolution and Order No. 00-7) which require the construction of on-site water quality facilities. The facilities shall be designed to remove 65 percent of the phosphorus contained in 100 percent of the storm water runoff generated from newly created impervious surfaces. In addition, a maintenance plan shall be submitted indicating the frequency and method to be used in keeping the facility maintained through the year. As no new impervious areas are being created, no additional compliance measures are required. Grading and Erosion Control: CWS Design and Construction Standards also regulate erosion control to reduce the amount of sediment and other pollutants reaching the public storm and surface water system resulting from development, construction, rading, excavating, clearing, and any other activity which accelerates erosion. Per CWS regulations, the applicant is required to submit an erosion control plan for City review and approval prior to issuance of City permits. The Federal Clean Water Act requires that a National Pollutant Discharge Elimination System (NPDES) erosion control permit be issued for any development that will disturb five or more acres of land. While the subject property is greater than 5 acres, the area of disturbance is limited to approximately 1200 square feet. Since this disturbed area is less than five acres, the developer will not be required to obtain an NPDES permit from the City prior to construction. This permit will be issued along with the site and/or building permit. NOTICE OF TYPE II DECISION SDR2002-00007/CINGULAR COMMUNICATIONS MONOPOLE PAGE 19 OF 22 A grading and erosion control plan must be submitted to the Building Division during the site permit review phase. The Building Division will review the onsite grading plan during the site permit review. A NPDES permit is not required, as the disturbance area is less than five acres in size. FINDING: Based on the above analysis, the Agency Concerns have been addressed by the application materials. Address Assignments: The City of Tigard is responsible for assigning addresses for parcels within the City of Tigard and within the Urban Service Boundary (USB). An addressing fee in the amount of $30.00 per address shall be assessed. This fee shall be paid to the City prior to issuance of a site permit. For this project, there is no additional addressing fee, as the existing address will be maintained. E. IMPACT STUDY (18.390 Section 18.360.090 states, "The Director shall make a finding with respect to each of the following criteria when approving, approving with conditions or denying an application:' Section 18.390.040 states that the applicant shall provide an impact study to quantify the effect of development on public facilities and services. For each public facility system and type of impact, the study shall propose improvements necessary to meet City standard, and to minimize the impact of the development on the public at large, public facilities systems, and affected private property users. In situations where the Community Development Code requires the dedication of real property interests, the applicant shall either specifically concur with a requirement for public right-of-way dedication, or provide evidence that supports that the real property dedication is not roughly proportional to the projected impacts of the development. Section 18.390.040 states that when a condition of approval requires the transfer to the public of an interest in real property, the approval authority shall adopt findings which support the conclusion that the interest in real property to be transferred is roughly proportional to the impact the proposed development will have on the public. The applicant has provided an impact study addressing the project's impacts on public systems. The study notes that there will be no impact to the transportation system as the facility will only generate one round trip per month. Bikeways will likewise not be affected, and there are no bikeways in the immediate area. The drainage system will not be adversely impacted either. As the area to be developed is presently covered with pavement, there will be no increase to the amount of stormwater runoff that is currently being contributed to the system. Parks, water and sewer systems will not be impacted as the proposed monopole is un-staffed and does not require sewer or water hookups. Earlier in this report, the issue about noise from the air conditioning units was raised, and a condition imposed that the applicant provides documentation regarding compliance with the noise limits. There is no TIF assessment for this use as it generates a limited amount of traffic. FINDING: The proposed development either has no impact or will mitigate the effect of the impact for the above noted public systems through the imposition of conditions. NOTICE OF TYPE II DECISION SDR2002-00007/CINGULAR COMMUNICATIONS MONOPOLE PAGE 20 OF 22 SECTION VII. OTHER STAFF COMMENTS The City of Tigard Forester has reviewed the proposal and noted that no trees will be impacted by the proposed improvements, and therefore has no comments. The City of Tigard Public Works Department and the City of Tigard Crime Prevention Office of the Police Department has reviewed the proposal and have no objections to it. SECTION VIII. AGENCY COMMENTS Washington County Communications (WCCCA) has reviewed the proposal and has no objections to it. Tualatin Valley Fire and Rescue has reviewed the applicant's submittal and provided the following comments: In order to ensure the adequate protection of the public health, safety, and welfare of the citizens of the City of Tigard, no permitted wireless communications facility operator shall operate the permitted facility in any way that impedes, impairs, or negatively impacts the communication abilities of any public safety or emergency response organization serving the public within the City of Tigard's jurisdictional limits. Additionally, it is noted that federal regulations give priority to communications involving safety of life or property, as follows: 47 CFR § 90.403 (d) provides in relevant part, that communications involving the imminent safety of fife or property, are to be afforded priority by all licensees. If interference complaints are filed against the cell tower operator, which allege radio frequency interference, the cell tower operator shall provide documentary evidence from the FCC that the cell tower operator has complied with all federal laws and regulations regarding the handling and resolution of such complaints, and confirming that the communications involving the public safety provider have been given priority by the cell tower operator. SECTION IX. PROCEDURE AND APPEAL INFORMATION Notice: Notice was posted at City Hall and mailed to: X The applicant and owners X Owner of record within the required distance X Affected government agencies Final Decision: THIS DECISION IS FINAL ON JUNE 27, 2002 AND BECOMES EFFECTIVE ON JULY 13, 2002 UNLESS AN APPEAL IS FILED. Appeal: The decision of the Director (Type II Procedure) or Review Authority (Type II Administrative Appeal or Type III Procedure) is final for purposes of appeal on the date that it is mailed. Any party with standing as provided in Section 18.390.040.G.1. may appeal this decision in accordance with Section 18.390.040.G.2. of the Tigard Community Development Code which provides that a written appeal together with the required fee shall be filed with the Director within ten (10) business days of the date the notice of the decision was mailed. The appeal fee schedule and forms are available from the Planning Division of Tigard City Hall, 13125 SW Hall Boulevard, Tigard, Oregon 97223. NOTICE OF TYPE II DECISION SDR2002-00007/CINGULAR COMMUNICATIONS MONOPOLE PAGE 21 OF 22 Unless the applicant is the appellant, the hearing on an appeal from the Director's Decision shall be confined to the specific issues identified in the written comments submitted by the parties during the comment period. Additional evidence concerning issues properly raised in the Notice of Appeal may be submitted by any party during the appeal hearing, subject to any additional rules of procedure that may be adopted from time to time by the appellate body. THE DEADLINE FOR FILING AN APPEAL IS AT 5:00 PM ON JULY 12, 2002. Questions: If you have any questions, please call the City of Tigard Planning Division, Tigard City Hall, 13125 SW Hall Boulevard, Tigard, Oregon at (503) 639-4171. �--� June 27, 2002 PREPARE it BY: orga racy DATE Associate Planner .�, .. �Gtc� June 27, 2002 APPROVED BY: Richard H. Bewgfs orff DATE Planning Man ger i:\curpin\morgan\workspace\sdr\sdr2002-00007(cingular)\sdr2002-00007 draft decision.doc NOTICE OF TYPE II DECISION SDR2002-00007/CINGULAR COMMUNICATIONS MONOPOLE PAGE 22 OF 22 caw.ra[s. ••, Ilf , t [ COST AP.-Sr.[. .'J ,. i, rI A I' 4, 4 l 4 l A's _ ima c l 'I. I• 1. I/ \L♦ l•', 4• Is A- N As, /�. DM LANOss/Av MC /r, O. / I *td. 11111/iii=alli Wilig=i/iNIM '•*-4 1.0, ISOCOO700 !0 M osE p61M0 CNC STORY 11011.10[M0.T • t PRY V ACCESS. cosmic 0CC SrtRY MIRAGE man.•A COSRNC o.[sro[o ara.a[Ymn.•r V. �r 1* .-?I VVVI T•riri •!!O. • UJCi'J'1.�.»10.E'7'4`O.!'3UJ'"h'� •.l eV 404( ' J 44, '''J;iI!!' 'J'J 1C e '•;AP au[niNC , [*SING r-o• rr. 'COSf.IC'MW CpK. ' '� MICR NMRNTA[ •rte .%r, is%i �i��i /%,."/ i I • ACS) ZONING ;.( I. ! ' COmC(C).0001._ I• ADJ 70NING COY TWO I �I ,'I twsr ca Diwl % mina— 1bSOC an O[iWRa a1[owc ? r I ''.......':1.'::!,,,,ir,:;,.:::::',.!.":"...:;',:::,:.!:::::!.!...,,,::.r. '''''::::::::::: - ,ertnAL r ' . 1 • OVERALL SITE PLAN • r Ebi ENLARGED SITE/FLOOR PLAN . 1 4''. CITY OF TIGARD SDR2002.00007NAR2002.00017 OT'Of TIGARD • SITE PLAN N CINGULAR WIRELESS MONOPOLE TOWER (Map is not to scale) �w - _''OiC,./> Mi we CITY of TIGARD VO J�`w` a GEOGRAPHIC INFORMATION SYSTEM .p1 ..0 . m � �� Qb : <. VICINITY MAP #.*### 1 1 T �i ♦ 4.::;#/# if) � SDR2002-00007 YAR2002-00017 S 44? alwr • %ES Ill CINGULAR WIRELESS fir♦ • Sw °_` i r I -=.W. " MONOPOLE TOWER IIII ,i. AI Tht , .# la Ns kO\ 4 Alt.1 I I 11P ill** SITE Na 0 ,pow.. a•- 1111 p ' ` ;+ice •` DR /"._ 6'r;.\ ' . I �� .. , O, _ f�E Q% d./SONIfA RD_ .• # i BEND?-' HAM no �,'` `:� •∎ 0 ,. Tfgrd Mu Map ' F m� ® 0`o "AMRO ® 1 CO ®( N — ,,, IN1RHAM PO ja „ 0 200 400 800 Feat •r .i fimmi _ 1"=404 feet •L J■ A. ■■ at i • Mi S `.1 V A 3 City of Tigard CO Information on this map is for general location only and should be verified with the Development Services Division. - / -_ 13125 SW Hall Blvd Tigard,OR 97223 (503)639.4171 I I I I ill http 1 .ci.tigard.or.us Community Development Plot date: May 21,2002;C:\magic\MAGIC03.APR NOTICE OF TYPE II DECISION SITE DEVELOPMENT REVIEW (SDR) 2002-00007 ,�.1'�I CITY OF TIGARD ADJUSTMENT (VAR) 2002-00017 CommunityDeve&opment Shaping Better Community CINGULAR COMMUNICATIONS MONOPOLE TOWER 120 DAYS = 9/17/2002 SECTION I. APPLICATION SUMMARY FILE NAME: CINGULAR COMMUNICATIONS MONOPOLE TOWER CASE NOS.: Site Development Review (SDR) SDR2002-00007 Adjustment (VAR) VAR2002-00017 PROPOSAL: The applicant is proposing to construct an 80-foot monopole tower. The associated accessory equipment will be placed within an existing storage unit. An adjustment has been requested seeking relief from the requirement that the wireless communication facility enclosure be screened by landscaping. APPLICANT: Salmon PcS, Inc. OWNER: SSC Property Holdings 123 NE 3ru Ave, Suite 240 1155 Bailey Street, #440 Portland, OR 97232 Seattle, WA 98109 APPLICANT'S REP: Mericom Corporation Attn: Ed Fournier 25977 SW Canyon Creek Road, Suite E Wilsonville, OR 97070 LOCATION: 15700 SW Pacific Highway; WCTM 2S110DC, Tax Lot 00300. The subject site is located within the existing Shurgard Storage Center, north of Durham Road. ZONE: C-G: General Commercial District. The C-G zoning district is designed to accommodate a full range of retail, office and civic uses with a City-wide and even regional trade area; except where non-conforming, residential uses are limited to single-family residences which are located on the same site as a permitted use. A wide range of uses, including but not limited to adult entertainment, automotive equipment repair and storage, mini-warehouses, utilities, heliports, medical centers, major event entertainment, and gasoline stations, are permitted conditionally. APPLICABLE REVIEW CRITERIA: Community Development Code Chapters 18.370, 18.390, 18.520, 18.705, 18.730, 18.745, 18.765, 18.795 and 18.798. SECTION II . DECISION Notice is hereby given that the City of Tigard Community Development Director's designee has APPROVED the above Site Development Review request subject to certain conditions of approval. The findings and conclusions on which the decision is based are noted in the full decision, available at City Hall. THIS APPROVAL SHALL BE VALID FOR 18 MONTHS FROM THE EFFECTIVE DATE OF THIS DECISION. All documents and applicable criteria in the above-noted file are available for inspection at no cost or copies can be obtained for twenty-five cents (25 ) per page, or the current rate charged for copies at the time of the request. SECTION III. PROCEDURE AND APPEAL INFORMATION Notice: Notice mailed to: X The applicant and owners X Owner of record within the required distance X Affected government agencies Final Decision: THIS DECISION IS FINAL ON JUNE 27, 2002 AND BECOMES EFFECTIVE ON JULY 13, 2002 UNLESS AN APPEAL IS FILED. A eal: The Director's Decision is final on the date that it is mailed. All persons entitled to notice or who are otherwise adversely affected or aggrieved by the decision as provided in Section 18.390.040.G.1 may appeal this decision in accordance with Section 18.390.040.G.2 of the Tigard Community Development Code which provides that a written appeal together with the required fee shall be filed with the Director within ten (10) business days of the date the Notice of Decision was mailed. The appeal fee schedule and forms are available from the Planning Division of Tigard City Hall, 13125 SW Hall Boulevard, Tigard, Oregon 97223. Unless the applicant is the appellant, the hearing on an appeal from the Director's Decision shall be confined to the specific issues identified in the written comments submitted by the parties during the comment period. Additional evidence concerning issues properly raised in the Notice of Appeal may be submitted by any party during the appeal hearing, subject to any additional rules of procedure that may be adopted from time to time by the appellate body. I THE DEADLINE FOR FILING AN APPEAL IS 5:00 PM ON JULY, 12, 2002. Questions: For further information please contact the Planning Division Staff Planner, Morgan Tracy at (503) 639-4171, Tigard City Hall, 13125 SW Hall Boulevard, Tigard, Oregon 97223. , ., 0 '-:„....1,0,, rte,� 1.1.0 .i -. '.'�' VICINITY MAP r ��I0 .I - .6i SDR2002-00001 ■ 4/ ` a EB �� YAR2002-00011 j�V V ' at 03�.®® ,Ill CINGULAR WIRELESS ■t� ��I��: sw "°L ;:?51 a3:::i®I h 1.111 MONOPOLE TOWER °0-\'1 ki;011# . A #.4s , #4 \\\\\\:;:�:. :Ap, # ""1"`Z ', . ;f > `"tea...y, ,,, z )11 lor l41is ® , ,..# N NM..p„ 1 1..4x leCity of Tlyrd la In r ww.rw-.wr.nw __. I I h I , r � . �.....o..r...w.o..r. , , , , /. ... . 4_... ..r:mi o.mr. / r / -. PAMP A: : , , / 11111111112.111111111,10 ., � )m� 4 U I C''''i / /1"4 c•if'1 gah— i I .. I OVERALL SITE PLAN �ZRA"e..nr T1 .t CITY OF TIGARD 1' SDR2002.00007NAR2002.00017 SITE PLAN N CINGULAR WIRELESS MONOPOLE TOWER (Map is not to scale` AFFIDAVIT OF POSTING NOTICE IMPORTANT NOTICE: THE APPLICANT IS REQUIRED TO COMPLETE THIS AFFIDAVIT AND RETURN IT TO THE CITY AT THE ADDRESS BELOW, ACCOMPANIED BY A COPY OF THE NOTICE THAT WAS POSTED ON THE SITE. City of Tigard Planning Division 13125 SW Hall Boulevard Tigard, OR 97223-8189 In the Matter of the Proposed Land Use Applications for: Land Use File Nos.: SDR2002-00007NAR2002-00017 Land Use File Name: CINGULAR WIRELESS MONOPOLE TOWER I, Morgan Tracy, Associate Planner, do affirm that I am 16-presen-Othe party initiating interest in a land use proposal affecting the land located at (state the:approximate location(s) IF no address(s) and/or tax lot(s) currently registered) 157a9 SG()Pac.‘ t rtcf„wa.t and did personally post notice of the Public Hearing on the'propo'sed land use application(s) by means of weatherproof posting in the general vicinity of the affected territory, a copy of said notice being hereto attached and by reference made a part hereof, on the 2-R'` day of nc # , 2032 . • Signature Person Who Perfo ed Posting (In the presence of the Notary) (THIS SECTION FOR A STATE OF OREGON, NOTARY PUBLIC TO COMPLETE/NOTARIZE) STATE OF 00Q u►--- ) County of 1 4 4 5 1 4 .t'9-7 ) ss. Subscribed and sworn/affirmed before me on the Li day of 41A, , 20 0 Z.. • - Orri tAL BEAL � SHER11MAN S.CASPER NOTARY PUBLIC-OREGON i COON L 'r!N o'323409 3, NOTARY PUBLIC OF OREGON MY COMMISSION k,,,;�::,�^P,�Y 13,2003 My Commission Expires: 11,4 al /3, 2°93 h:\login\patty\masters\affidavit of posting for applicant to post public hearing.doc CINULAR WIRELESS MONOPOLE TOWER SITE DEVELOPMENT REVIEW (SDR) 2002-00007/ADJUSTMENT (VAR) 2002-00017 REQUEST: The applicant is proposing to construct an 80- foot wireless monopole tower. The associated accessory 3quipment will be placed within an existing storage unit. An adjustment has been requested seeking relief from the requirement that the wireless communication facility enclosure be screened by landscaping . LOCATION : 15700 SW Pacific Highway; WCTM 2S110DC, Tax Lot 00300 . ZONE : C-G : General Commercial District. APPLICABLE REVIEW CRITERIA: Community Development Code Chapters 18. 370, 18.390, 18. 520, 18 .705, 18.730, 18.745, 18. 765, 18 .795 and 18 .798 . Further information may be obtained from the Planning Division (staff contact: Morgan Tracy) at 13125 SW Hall Blvd., Tigard, Oregon 97223, or by calling 503-639-4171 . A copy of the application and all documents and evidence submitted by or on behalf of the applicant and the applicable criteria are available for inspection at no cost and copies for all items can also be provided at a reasonable cost. NOTICE TO MORTGAGEE, LIENHOLDER,VENDOR OR SELLER: THE TIGARD DEVELOPMENT CODE REQUIRES THAT IF YOU RECEIVE THIS NOTICE,IT SHALL BE PROMPTLY FORWARDED TO THE PURCHASER. NOTICE OF PENDING LAND USE APPLICATION SITE DEVELOPMENT REVIEW CITY TY OF TIGARD Community(Development Shaping (Better Community DATE OF NOTICE: May 21, 2002 FILE NUMBER: SITE DEVELOPMENT REVIEW (SDR) 2002-00007 Type II Land Use Application ADJUSTMENT (VAR) 2002-00017 Type I Land Use Application FILE NAME: CINGULAR WIRELESS MONOPOLE TOWER PROPOSAL: The applicant is proposing to construct an 80-foot wireless monopole tower. The associated accessory equipment will be placed within an existing storage unit. An adjustment has been requested seeking relief from the requirement that the wireless communication facility enclosure be screened by landscaping. ZONE: C-G: General Commercial District. The C-G zoning district is designed to accommodate a full range of retail, office and civic uses with a City-wide and even regional trade area; except where non-conforming, residential uses are limited to single-family residences which are located on the same site as a permitted use. A wide range of uses, including but not limited to adult entertainment, automotive equipment repair and storage, mini-warehouses, utilities, heliports, medical centers, major event entertainment, and gasoline stations, are permitted conditionally. APPLICABLE REVIEW CRITERIA: Community Development Code Chapters 18.370, 18.390, 18.520, 18.705, 18.730, 18.745, 18.765, 18.795 and 18.798. LOCATION: 15700 SW Pacific Highway; WCTM 2S110DC, Tax Lot 00300. YOUR RIGHT TO PROVIDE WRITTEN COMMENTS: Prior to the City making any decision on the Application, you are hereby provided a fourteen (14) day period to submit written comments on the application to the City. THE FOURTEEN (14) DAY PERIOD ENDS AT 5:00 PM ON JUNE 4, 2002. All comments should be directed to Morgan Tracy, Associate Planner in the Planning Division at the City of Tigard, 13125 SW Hall Boulevard, Tigard, Oregon 97223. You may reach the City of Tigard by telephone at (503) 639-4171. ALL COMMENTS MUST BE RECEIVED BY THE CITY OF TIGARD IN WRITING PRIOR TO 5:00 PM ON THE DATE SPECIFIED ABOVE IN ORDER FOR YOUR COMMENTS TO BE CONSIDERED IN THE DECISION MAKING PROCESS THE CITY OF TIGARD APPRECIATES RECEIVING COMMENTS AND VALUES YOUR INPUT. COMMENTS WILL BE CONSIDERED AND ADDRESSED WITHIN THE NOTICE OF DECISION. A DECISION ON THIS ISSUE IS TENTATIVELY SCHEDULED FOR JULY 3, 2002. IF YOU PROVIDE COMMENTS, YOU WILL BE SENT A COPY OF THE FULL DECISION ONCE IT HAS BEEN RENDERED. WRITTEN COMMENTS WILL BECOME A PART OF THE PERMANENT PUBLIC RECORD AND SHALL CONTAIN THE FOLLOWING INFORMATION: • Address the specific "Applicable Review Criteria" described in the section above or any other criteria believed to be applicable to this proposal; • Raise any issues and/or concerns believed to be important with sufficient evidence to allow the City to provide a response; • Comments that provide the basis for an appeal to the Tigard Hearings Officer must address the relevant approval criteria with sufficient specificity on that issue. Failure of any party to address the relevant approval criteria with sufficient specificity may preclude subsequent appeals to the Land Use Board of Appeals or Circuit Court on that issue. Specific findings directed at the relevant approval criteria are what constitute relevant evidence. AFTER THE 14 DAY COMMENT PERIOD CLOSES, THE DIRECTOR SHALL ISSUE A TYPE II ADMINISTRATIVE DECISION. THE DIRECTOR'S DECISION SHALL BE MAILED TO THE APPLICANT AND TO OWNERS OF RECORD OF PROPERTY LOCATED WITHIN 500 FEET OF THE SUBJECT SITE, AND TO ANYONE ELSE WHO SUBMITTED WRITTEN COMMENTS OR WHO IS OTHERWISE ENTITLED TO NOTICE. THE DIRECTOR'S DECISION SHALL ADDRESS ALL OF THE RELEVANT APPROVAL CRITERIA. BASED UPON THE CRITERIA AND THE FACTS CONTAINED WITHIN THE RECORD, THE DIRECTOR SHALL APPROVE, APPROVE WITH CONDITIONS OR DENY THE REQUESTED PERMIT OR ACTION. SUMMARY OF THE DECISION-MAKING PROCESS: ♦ The application is accepted by the City ♦ Notice is sent to property owners of record within 500 feet of the proposed development area allowing a 14-day written comment period. ♦ The application is reviewed by City Staff and affected agencies. ♦ City Staff issues a written decision. ♦ Notice of the decision is sent to the Applicant and all owners or contract purchasers of record of the site; all owners of record of property located within 500 feet of the site, as shown on the most recent property tax assessment roll; any City-recognized neighborhood group whose boundaries include the site; and any governmental agency which is entitled to notice under an intergovernmental agreement entered into with the City which includes provision for such notice or anyone who is otherwise entitled to such notice. INFORMATION/EVIDENCE AVAILABLE FOR REVIEW: The application, written comments and supporting documents relied upon by the Director to make this decision are contained within the record and are available for public review at the City of Tigard Community Development Department. Copies of these items may be obtained at a cost of $.25 per page or the current rate charged for this service. Questions regarding this application should be directed to the Planning Staff indicated on the first page of this Notice under the section titled "Your Right to Provide Written Comments." Fr- �j `,YrTv� CITY of TIGARD_. .........,...,... ...... 1 ,,,... ,., ,, 1.' al VICINITY MAP iii pp 0.0., , rgi.I SDR2002-00001 ■ 4 1Q� � � VAR2002-00011•IN •�., ��-, .-`° ��0® !■. CINGULAR WIRELESS �� ,;�� ' ;;:� Q::;Ng N1 ==� � MONOPOLE TOWER ,��I .. .. . mil IP. ►o 'i�;I'�� sett it, 1 sl �p \ 'sue, ' 4!. is-"yam . 1 004* r it4> %,%Q''• ,, ^W.11 ® [0.® N . _-r O w . , NCB I - ,r.. ve 3Cr � aver Tiprd '_ 6i ww .r+111w�r..rrror_ 111111 7' T ur.+�atiw.� REQUEST FOR COMMENTS RECEIVED June 3, 2002 Morgan Tracy CITY OF TIGARD Associate Planner PLANNING/ENGINEERING City of Tigard Ref: File 2002-00007, Adjustment 2002-00017, Cingular Wireless Monopole Tower Dear Mr. Tracy, As indicated in our earlier conversation, I am appalled that the zoning code was changed (fairly recently) to allow structures of the size and height of the proposed tower as outright permitted uses in the General Commercial District. Given the configuration of most of the commercial parcels -- strip development in simple terms -- with close proximity to dense residential developments, it appears that esthetic considerations for the senior communities as well as the owners on Bull Mountain and Little Bull Mountain were sacrificed for the benefit of a few types of businesses. The 14 day period for Citizen Comment is quite inadequate, given the interruption by a 3 day holiday. I was unable to obtain any solid data from informed sources about possible interference from such a tower on ham radio usage or regarding potential disruption of communications between the Red Cross Transportation Dispatch office in King City, the dispatch center in North Portland, and the 4 CB radio equipped vehicles based in King City. A reliable communications link is crucial for the operation of the Volunteer Transportation program as well as for Ride Connection. If there are interference problems attributable to the wireless tower, does the City have any capability to require modifications to the facility? Finally, regarding the variance request dealing with the landscaping, if the applicant is allowed to ignore that provision of the Code it seems only reasonable that he assume some responsibility for guaranteeing the continued good health of the shrubs that presently screen the storage facility and proposed tower location from the apartment windows and patios of the congregate care facility (Summerfield Clubhouse Estates) on the adjacent property to the South. That hedge is vulnerable to any number of accidents -- natural and man-made; the property owner has a responsibility to replace dead and dying shrubs, but is that routinely enforced? Should not the applicant shoulder some of that obligation? The applicant is trying to build the cheapest way he can; the property owner will fatten his bank account; and the citizens of South Tigard will get a monstrous eyesore -- at the very minimum , with a potential for other problems as well. Sincerely, Sally Jones i�7�s 4W/ /4_ • Morgan Tracy- Cingular Wireless Mona Tower.doc Page 1 A 164 TUALATIN VALLEY FIRE & RESCUE • SOUTH DIVISION COMMUNITY SERVICES • OPERATIONS • FIRE PREVENTION June 3,2002 Mr. Morgan Tracy,Associate Planner City of Tigard 13125 SW Hall Blvd Tigard,OR 97223 Re: Cingular Wireless Monopole Tower, Casefile No. SDR 2002-00007/VAR 2002-00017 Dear Morgan, Emergency service providers,both police and fire, have been experiencing ongoing interference problems with our 800 MHz radio system. As wireless communications providers continue to expand their use of the frequency spectrum,we can expect the problem to get worse. As a result,we have done an extensive amount of research in an attempt to determine what actions might be taken at the local level to protect public safety communications systems. We have determined that our local planning departments can be a key component in the protection of the emergency communication capabilities of their police and fire departments. It is well established that local jurisdictions have the right to attach reasonable conditions to the approval of conditional use permits for communication sites. Within that context,we feel that local jurisdictions have the responsibility to attach conditions that protect the public safety of its citizens. Accordingly,we suggest that clause be included as a condition of approval for the application referenced above: "In order to ensure the adequate protection of the public safety,health and welfare of the citizens of Tigard, no permitted cell tower operator,"wireless communication facility" operator,"radio frequency transmission facility"operator,communication site operator, [or however the local code describes a cell tower operator],shall operate the permitted facility in any way that impedes, impairs,or negatively impacts the communication abilities of any public safety or emergency response organization serving the public within Tigard's jurisdictional limits." Additionally,you may want to include a clause that makes the federal regulations that require priority be given to communications involving safety-of-life or property as a condition of approval. Such language might read as follows: 47 CFR§90.403 (d)provides, in relevant part,that communications involving the imminent safety-of-life or property,are to be afforded priority by all licensees. If interference complaints are filed against the cell tower operator,which allege radio frequency interference,the cell tower operator shall provide documentary evidence from the FCC that the cell tower operator has complied with all federal laws and regulations regarding the handling and resolution of such complaints,and confirming that the communications involving the public safety provider have been given priority by the cell tower operator. Thank you for your consideration of this vital public safety concern. Respectfully, Gary C.Wells Division Chief 7401 SW Washo Court,Suite 101 •Tualatin,Oregon ff e22•oT®.(503)612-7000•Fax(503)612-7003•www.tvfr.com 06/04/02 TUE 14:47 FAX 503 531 0186 WCCCA ADMIN 0 001 REQUEST FOR COMMENTS CITY OFTIGARD Community Development Shaping01 wetter Community DATE: May 21.2002 TO: Dave Austin,WCCCA FROM: el lty 01 Tigard Pilllu�liig oiYlslaa STAFF CONTACT: Morgan Tracy.Associate Planner 1x4071 Phone: 1503)639-4111/Fax (5031684-7297 SITE DEVELOPMENT REVIEW[SDR)2002-00001/ADJUSTMENT[VAR)2002-00011 ➢ CINGULAR WIRELESS MONOPOLE TOWER Q REQUEST: The applicant is proposing to construct an 80-foot wireless monopole tower. The associated accessory equipment will be placed within an existing storage unit. An adjustment has been requested seeking relief from the requirement that the wireless communication facility enclosure be screened by landscaping. LOCATION: 15700 SW Pacific Highway; WCTM 2S110DC, Tax Lot 00300. ZONE: C-G: General Commercial District. The C-G zoning district is designed to accommodate a full range of retail, office and civic uses with a City-wide and even regional trade area; except where non-conforming, residential uses are limited to single-family residences which are located on the same site as a permitted use. A wide range of uses, including but not limited to adult entertainment, automotive equipment repair and storage, mini-warehouses, utilities, heliports, medical centers, major event entertainment, and gasoline stations, are permitted conditionally. APPLICABLE REVIEW CRITERIA: Community Development Code Chapters 18.370, 18.390, 18.520, 18.705, 18.730, 18.745, 18.765, 18.795 and 18.798. Attached are the Site Plan, Vicinity Map and Applicant's Materials for your review. From information supplied by various departments and agencies and from other information available to our staff, a report and recommendation will be prepared and a decision will be rendered on the proposal in the near future. If you wish to comment on this application, WE NEED YOUR COMMENTS BACK BY: JUNE 4_2002. You may use the space provided below or attach a separate letter to return your comments. If you are unable to respond by the above date, please phone the staff contact noted above with your comments and confirm your comments in writing as soon as possible. If you have any questions, contact the Tigard Planning Division, 13125 SW Hall Boulevard, Tigard, OR 97223. I PLEASE CHECK THE FOLLOWING ITEMS THAT APPLY: XWe have reviewed the proposal and have no objections to it. Please contact of our office. Please refer to the enclosed letter. Written comments provided below: (PCease provide thefo!lowing information)Name of Person(s) Commenting: r (,UCC(• . - Phone Number(s): _ • REQUEST FOR COMMENTS CITY OF TIOARD Community Development Shaping Better Community DATE: May 21,2002 TO: Mall Stine,Urban Forester/Public Works Department FROM: City of Tigard Planning Division STAFF CONTACT: Morgan Tracy,Associate Planner[x401] Phone: [503)639-4171/Fax: 15031684-1291 SITE DEVELOPMENT REVIEW MDR]2002-00007/ADJUSTMENT[VAR]2002-00017 r CINGULAR WIRELESS MONOPOLE TOWER REQUEST: The applicant is proposing to construct an 80-foot wireless monopole tower. The associated accessory equipment will be placed within an existing storage unit. An adjustment has been requested seeking relief from the requirement that the wireless communication facility enclosure be screened by landscaping. LOCATION: 15700 SW Pacific Highway; WCTM 2S110DC, Tax Lot 00300. ZONE: C-G: General Commercial District. The C-G zoning district is designed to accommodate a full range of retail, office and civic uses with a City-wide and even regional trade area; except where non-conforming, residential uses are limited to single-family residences which are located on the same site as a permitted use. A wide range of uses, including but not limited to adult entertainment, automotive equipment repair and storage, mini-warehouses, utilities, heliports, medical centers, major event entertainment, and gasoline stations, are permitted conditionally. APPLICABLE REVIEW CRITERIA: Community Development Code Chapters 18.370, 18.390, 18.520, 18.705, 18.730, 18.745, 18.765, 18.795 and 18.798. Attached are the Site Plan, Vicinity Map and Applicant's Materials for your review. From information supplied by various departments and agencies and from other information available to our staff, a report and recommendation will be prepared and a decision will be rendered on the proposal in the near future. If you wish to comment on this application, WE NEED YOUR COMMENTS BACK BY: JUNE 4, 2002. You may use the space provided below or attach a separate letter to return your comments. If you are unable to respond by the above date, please phone the staff contact noted above with your comments and confirm your comments in writing as soon as possible. If you have any questions, contact the Tigard Planning Division, 13125 SW Hall Boulevard, Tigard, OR 97223. PLEASE CHECK THE FOLLOWING ITEMS THAT APPLY: We have reviewed the proposal and have no objections to it. Please contact of our office. Please refer to the enclosed letter. Written comments provided below: AJo r `ni 1/0 >6 No (e( 44 N rs ((ase provide thefotTowing information)Name of Person(s) Commenting: IPhone Number(s): I REQUEST FOR COMMENTS CITY�OlFTIOARD Community(DeveCopment Shaping Better Community DATE: May 21,2002 TO: Dennis Koellermeier,Operations Manager/Water Department FROM: City of Tigard Planning Division STAFF CONTACT: Morgan Tracy,Associate Planner[x4011 Phone: [503)639-4111/Fax: [503)684-1291 SITE DEVELOPMENT REVIEW(SDRJ 2002-00007/ADJUSTMENT[VAR)2002-00017 CINGULAR WIRELESS MONOPOLE TOWER < REQUEST: The applicant is proposing to construct an 80-foot wireless monopole tower. The associated accessory equipment will be placed within an existing storage unit. An adjustment has been requested seeking relief from the requirement that the wireless communication facility enclosure be screened by landscaping. LOCATION: 15700 SW Pacific Highway; WCTM 2S110DC, Tax Lot 00300. ZONE: C-G: General Commercial District. The C-G zoning district is designed to accommodate a full range of retail, office and civic uses with a City-wide and even regional trade area; except where non-conforming, residential uses are limited to single-family residences which are located on the same site as a permitted use. A wide range of uses, including but not limited to adult entertainment, automotive equipment repair and storage, mini-warehouses, utilities, heliports, medical centers, major event entertainment, and gasoline stations, are permitted conditionally. APPLICABLE REVIEW CRITERIA: Community Development Code Chapters 18.370, 18.390, 18.520, 18.705, 18.730, 18.745, 18.765, 18.795 and 18.798. Attached are the Site Plan, Vicinity Map and Applicant's Materials for your review. From information supplied by various departments and agencies and from other information available to our staff, a report and recommendation will be prepared and a decision will be rendered on the proposal in the near future. If you wish to comment on this application, WE NEED YOUR COMMENTS BACK BY: JUNE 4, 2002. You may use the space provided below or attach a separate letter to return your comments. If you are unable to respond by the above date, please phone the staff contact noted above with your comments and confirm your comments in writing as soon as possible. If you have any questions, contact the Tigard Planning Division, 13125 SW Hall Boulevard, Tigard, OR 97223. PLEASE CHECK THE FOLLOWING ITEMS THAT APPLY: We have reviewed the proposal and have no objections to it. Please contact of our office. Please refer to the enclosed letter. Written comments provided below: /1 Q p C'A.‘)t lam/t i k I•�//�,U .S4r- mann a 6 2.2./e — £1 . ,lye'" (cIease provide tliiefolTwing information)Name of Person(s) Commenting: Phone Number(s): REQUEST FOR COMMENTS CITY OF TIGARD Community(Development 5hapingA Better Community RECEIVED PLANNING DATE: May 21,2002 r F, 2 2 2002 TO: lim Wolf,Tigard Police Department Crime Prevention Officer CITY C TIGARD FROM: City of Tigard Planning Division STAFF CONTACT: Morgan Tracy,Associate Planner[x4071 Phone: [503)639-4171/Fax: [5031684-7297 SITE DEVELOPMENT REVIEW[SORT 2002-00001/ADJUSTMENT[VAR)2002-00011 CINGULAR WIRELESS MONOPOLE TOWER REQUEST: The applicant is proposing to construct an 80-foot wireless monopole tower. The associated accessory equipment will be placed within an existing storage unit. An adjustment has been requested seeking relief from the requirement that the wireless communication facility enclosure be screened by landscaping. LOCATION: 15700 SW Pacific Highway; WCTM 2S110DC, Tax Lot 00300. ZONE: C-G: General Commercial District. The C-G zoning district is designed to accommodate a full range of retail, office and civic uses with a City-wide and even regional trade area; except where non-conforming, residential uses are limited to single-family residences which are located on the same site as a permitted use. A wide range of uses, including but not limited to adult entertainment, automotive equipment repair and storage, mini-warehouses, utilities, heliports, medical centers, major event entertainment, and gasoline stations, are permitted conditionally. APPLICABLE REVIEW CRITERIA: Community Development Code Chapters 18.370, 18.390, 18.520, 18.705, 18.730, 18.745, 18.765, 18.795 and 18.798. Attached are the Site Plan, Vicinity Map and Applicant's Materials for your review. From information supplied by various departments and agencies and from other information available to our staff, a report and recommendation will be prepared and a decision will be rendered on the proposal in the near future. If you wish to comment on this application, WE NEED YOUR COMMENTS BACK BY: JUNE 4, 2002. You may use the space provided below or attach a separate letter to return your comments. If you are unable to respond by the above date, please phone the staff contact noted above with your comments and confirm your comments in writing as soon as possible. If you have any questions, contact the Tigard Planning Division, 13125 SW Hall Boulevard, Tigard, OR 97223. PLEASE CHECK THE FOLLOWING ITEMS THAT APPLY: r" We have reviewed the proposal and have no objections to it. Please contact of our office. Please refer to the enclosed letter. Written comments provided below: (Pr ease provide the fo llowing information)Name of Person(s) Commenting: (ji M v`JOLF IPhone Number(s): REQUEST FOR COMMENTS CITYOFTIIGARD Community(Development SltapingA Better Community DATE: May 21,2002 RECEIVED PLANNING TO: John Roy,Property Manager/Public Works Department MAY 2 2 2002 FROM: City of Tigard Planning Division "' TIGARD STAFF CONTACT: Morgan Tracy,Associate Planner[x4011 Phone: [503)639-4111/Fax: [5031684-1291 SITE DEVELOPMENT REVIEW(SDRJ 2002-00007/ADJUSTMENT[VAR]2002-00017 CINGULAR WIRELESS MONOPOLE TOWER REQUEST: The applicant is proposing to construct an 80-foot wireless monopole tower. The associated accessory equipment will be placed within an existing storage unit. An adjustment has been requested seeking relief from the requirement that the wireless communication facility enclosure be screened by landscaping. LOCATION: 15700 SW Pacific Highway; WCTM 2S110DC, Tax Lot 00300. ZONE: C-G: General Commercial District. The C-G zoning district is designed to accommodate a full range of retail, office and civic uses with a City-wide and even regional trade area; except where non-conforming, residential uses are limited to single-family residences which are located on the same site as a permitted use. A wide range of uses, including but not limited to adult entertainment, automotive equipment repair and storage, mini-warehouses, utilities, heliports, medical centers, major event entertainment, and gasoline stations, are permitted conditionally. APPLICABLE REVIEW CRITERIA: Community Development Code Chapters 18.370, 18.390, 18.520, 18.705, 18.730, 18.745, 18.765, 18.795 and 18.798. Attached are the Site Plan, Vicinity Map and Applicant's Materials for your review. From information supplied by various departments and agencies and from other information available to our staff, a report and recommendation will be prepared and a decision will be rendered on the proposal in the near future. If you wish to comment on this application, WE NEED YOUR COMMENTS BACK BY: JUNE 4, 2002. You may use the space provided below or attach a separate letter to return your comments. If you are unable to respond by the above date, please phone the staff contact noted above with your comments and confirm your comments in writing as soon as possible. If you have any questions, contact the Tigard Planning Division, 13125 SW Hall Boulevard, Tigard, OR 97223. PLEASE CHECK THE FOLLOWING ITEMS THAT APPLY: have reviewed the proposal and have no objections to it. Please contact of our office. Please refer to the enclosed letter. Written comments provided below: (P[ease provide thefo[[owing information)Name of Person(s) Commenting: IPhone Number(s): I REQUEST FOR COMMENTS ��n FTIC3ARD Community Deve(opment SfiapingA Better Community DATE: May 21,2002 TO: PER ATTACHED FROM: City of Tigard Planning Division STAFF CONTACT: Morgan Tracy,Associate Planner[x401] Phone: [503]639-4111/Fax: [503]684-1291 SITE DEVELOPMENT REVIEW MR)2002-00001/ADJUSTMENT[VAR)2002-00011 CINGULAR WIRELESS MONOPOLE TOWER REQUEST: The applicant is proposing to construct an 80-foot wireless monopole tower. The associated accessory equipment will be placed within an existing storage unit. An adjustment has been requested seeking relief from the requirement that the wireless communication facility enclosure be screened by landscaping. LOCATION: 15700 SW Pacific Highway; WCTM 2S110DC, Tax Lot 00300. ZONE: C-G: General Commercial District. The C-G zoning district is designed to accommodate a full range of retail, office and civic uses with a City-wide and even regional trade area; except where non-conforming, residential uses are limited to single-family residences which are located on the same site as a permitted use. A wide range of uses, including but not limited to adult entertainment, automotive equipment repair and storage, mini-warehouses, utilities, heliports, medical centers, major event entertainment, and gasoline stations, are permitted conditionally. APPLICABLE REVIEW CRITERIA: Community Development Code Chapters 18.370, 18.390, 18.520, 18.705, 18.730, 18.745, 18.765, 18.795 and 18.798. Attached are the Site Plan, Vicinity Map and Applicant's Materials for your review. From information supplied by various departments and agencies and from other information available to our staff, a report and recommendation will be prepared and a decision will be rendered on the proposal in the near future. If you wish to comment on this application, WE NEED YOUR COMMENTS BACK BY: JUNE 4, 2002. You may use the space provided below or attach a separate letter to return your comments. If you are unable to respond by the above date, please phone the staff contact noted above with your comments and confirm your comments in writing as soon as possible. If you have any questions, contact the Tigard Planning Division, 13125 SW Hall Boulevard, Tigard, OR 97223. PLEASE CHECK THE FOLLOWING ITEMS THAT APPLY: We have reviewed the proposal and have no objections to it. Please contact of our office. Please refer to the enclosed letter. Written comments provided below: (Tkase provide the foltowing information)Name of Person(s) Commenting: IPhone Number(s): I CITY TIGARD REQUEST FOR COh :NTS NOTIFICATION LIST FOR LAND USE & COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT APPLICATIONS FILE NOS.: 400,7-O'ODO7 „, aiDDA-Gu/7FILE NAME: 4 ` i1/ 1/ ' / CITIZEN INVOLVEMENT TEAMS 14-DAY PENDING APPLICATION NOTICE TO CIT AREA: ❑Central DEast ❑South ❑West IZIProposal Descrip.in Library CIT Book CITY OFFICES LONG RANGE PLANNING/Barbara Shields,Planning Mgr. COMMUNITY DVLPMNT.DEPTJPIanning-Engineering Techs. OLICE DEPTJJim Wolf,Crime Prevention Officer BUILDING DIVISION/Gary Lampella,Building Official __JV ENGINEERING DEPTJBrian Rager,Dvlpmnt.Review Engineer ATER DEPTJDennis Koellermeier,Operations Mgr. _CITY ADMINISTRATION/Cathy Wheatley,City Recorder PUBLIC WORKS/John Roy,Property Manager PUBLIC WORKS/Matt Stine,Urban Forester I PLANNER—POST PROJECT SITE IF A PUBLIC HEARING ITEM-10 BUSINESS DAYS PRIOR TO THE PUBLIC HEARING! _C.DJSherman Casper,Permit Coord.(sowcuP re:TIF) SPECIAL DISTRICTS _ TUAL.HILLS PARK&REC.DIST.* I TUALATIN VALLEY FIRE&RESCUE* _ TUALATIN VALLEY WATER DISTRICT* _ CLEANWATER SERVICES* Planning Manager Fire Marshall Administrative Office Lee Walker/SWM Program 15707 SW Walker Road Washington County Fire District PO Box 745 155 N.First Avenue Beaverton,OR 97006 (place in pick-up box) Beaverton,OR 97075 Hillsboro,OR 97124 LOCAL AND STATE JURISDICTIONS CITY OF BEAVERTON * _ CITY OF TUALATIN* _OR.DEPT.OF FISH&WILDLIFE _OR.DIV.OF STATE LANDS _ Planning Manager Planning Manager 2501 SW First Avenue Jennifer Goodridge _ Irish Bunnell,Development Services PO Box 369 PO Box 59 775 Summer Street NE PO Box 4755 Tualatin,OR 97062 Portland,OR 97207 Salem,OR 97301-1279 Beaverton,OR 97076 OR.PUB.UTILITIES COMM. METRO-LAND USE&PLANNING * _OR.DEPT.OF GEO.&MINERAL IND. 550 Capitol Street NE _ CITY OF DURHAM * 600 NE Grand Avenue 800 NE Oregon Street,Suite 5 Salem,OR 97310-1380 City Manager Portland,OR 97232-2736 Portland,OR 97232 PO Box 23483 _ Bob Knight,Data Resource Center(ZCA) _US ARMY CORPS.OF ENG. Durham,OR 97281-3483 _ Paulette Allen,Growth Management Coordinator _OR.DEPT.OF LAND CONSERV.&DVLP. Kathryn Harris _ Mel Huie,Greenspaces Coordinator(CPA/ZOA) Larry French(Comp.Plan Amendments Only) Routing CENWP-OP-G _/CITY OF KING CITY* _ Jennifer Budhabhatti,Regional Planner(Wetlands) 635 Capitol Street NE,Suite 150 PO Box 2946 City Manager _ C.D. Manager,Growth Management Services Salem,OR 97301-2540 Portland,OR 97208-2946 15300 SW 116th Avenue King City,OR 97224 WASHINGTON COUNTY / OR.DEPT.OF ENERGY(Powerlines in Area) /OREGON DEPT.OF TRANS.(ODOT) Dept.of Land Use&Transp. Bonneville Power Administration Aeronautics Division(Monopole Towers) 155 N.First Avenue —CITY OF LAKE OSWEGO* Routing TTRC–Attn: Renae Ferrera Tom Highland,Planning Suite 350,MS 13 Planning Director PO Box 3621 3040 25th Street,SE Hillsboro,OR 97124 PO Box 369 Portland,OR 97208-3621 Salem,OR 97310 _Brent Curtis(CPA) Lake Oswego,OR 97034 _Gregg Leion(CPA) _ OR.DEPT.OF ENVIRON.QUALITY(DEQ) ODOT,REGION 1 * _Anne LaMountain(IGAaRB) — CITY OF PORTLAND (Notify for Wetlands and Potential Environmental Impacts) _Sonya Kazen,Development Review Coordinator _Phil Healy(cGANRB) David Knowles,Planning Bureau Dir. Regional Administrator _Carl Toland, Right-of-Way Section(vacations) _Steve Conway(General Apps.) Portland Building 106,Rm. 1002 2020 SW Fourth Avenue,Suite 400 123 NW Flanders _Sr.Cartographer(cPAacA)ras,4 1120 SW Fifth Avenue Portland,OR 97201-4987 Portland,OR 97209-4037 _Jim Nims(zcA)Ms 15 Portland,OR 97204 _Doria Mateja(ZCA)MS 14 —ODOT,REGION 1 -DISTRICT 2A IV WA.CO.CONSOLIDATED COMMUNIC.AGENCY(WCCCA)"911"(Monopole Towers) Jane Estes,Permit Specialist Dave Austin 5440 SW Westgate Drive,Suite 350 PO Box 6375 Portland,OR 97221-2414 Beaverton,OR 97007-0375 UTILITY PROVIDERS AND SPECIAL AGENCIES _PORTLAND WESTERN R/R,BURLINGTON NORTHERN/SANTA FE R/R,OREGON ELECTRIC R/R(Burlington Northern/Santa Fe R/R Predecessor) Robert I.Melbo,President&General Manager 110 W. 10th Avenue Albany,OR 97321 , _SOUTHERN PACIFIC TRANS.CO.R/R _METRO AREA COMMUNICATIONS ZAT&T CABLE _TRI-MET TRANSIT DVLPMT. Clifford C.Cabe,Construction Engineer Debra Palmer(Annexations Only) Pat McGann (If Project is Within'/.Mile of A Transit Route) 5424 SE McLoughlin Boulevard Twin Oaks Technology Center 14200 SW Brigadoon Court Ben Baldwin,Project Planner Portland,OR 97232 1815 NW 169th Place,S-6020 Beaverton,OR 97005 710 NE Holladay Street / /Beaverton,OR 97006-4886 // Portland,OR 97232 ✓ PORTLAND GENERAL ELECTRIC ✓ NW NATURAL GAS COMPANY `�VERIZON /QWEST COMMUNICATIONS Jim VanKleek,Svc.Design Consultant Scott Palmer,Engineering Coord. Ken Perdue,Engineering Jeri Cella,Engineering 9480 SW Boeckman Road 220 NW Second Avenue PO Box 1100 8021 SW Capitol Hill Rd,Rm 110 Wilsonville,OR 97070 Portland,OR 97209-3991 Beaverton,OR 97075-1100 Portland,OR 97219 —TIGARD/TUALATIN SCHOOL DIST.#23J .. _BEAVERTON SCHOOL DIST.#48 — AT&T CABLE(A,pE.u .en NOM of Marsha Butler,Administrative Offices Jan Youngquist,Demographics&Planning Dept. Diana Carpenter 6960 SW Sandburg Street 16550 SW Merlo Road 3500 SW Bond Street Tigard,OR 97223-8039 Beaverton,OR 97006-5152 Portland,OR 97232 * INDICATES AUTOMATIC NOTIFICATION IN COMPLIANCE WITH INTERGOVERNMENTAL AGREEMENT IF WITHIN 500' OF THE SUBJECT PROPERTY FOR ANY/ALL CITY PROJECTS(Project Planner Is Responsible For Indicating Parties To Notify). h:\patty\masters\Request For Comments Notification List 2.doc (Revised: 7-May-02) MAILING RECORDS AFFIDAVIT OF MAILING CITY OFTIGARD Community(Development Shaping(Better Community I, Patricia L. Lunsford, being first duly sworn/affirm, on oath depose and say that I am a Senior Administrative Specialist for the City of lgand�Washington County, Oregon and that I served the following: {Check Appmpnate Box(s)Below) E21 NOTICE OF DECISION FOR: SDR2002-00007/VAR2002-00017 — CINGULAR COMMUNICATIONS MONOPOLE TOWER ❑ AMENDED NOTICE (File No/Name Reference) ® City of Tigard Planning Director A copy of the said notice being hereto attached, marked Exhibit"A", and by reference made a part hereof, was mailed to each named person(s) at the address(s) shown on the attached list(s), marked EXIiihit"B", and by reference made a part hereof, on lune 21,2002, and deposited in the United States Mail on June 21,2002, postage prepaid. (Per' ' at Pr:eared Notice) STA(1I OE OPGON ) County of'Washington )ss. City of Tigard ) �� n Subscribed and sworn/affirmed before me on the I J day of , 2002. • OFFICIAL SEAL " DIANE M JELDERKS NOTARY PUBLIC-OREGON COMMISSION NO.326578 �� MY COMMISSION EXPIRES SEPT.07,2009 ' I • I . I I ' I My Commission Expires. 7 0 EMU P NOTICE OF TYPE II DECISION SITE DEVELOPMENT REVIEW (SDR) 2002-00007",1_� CITY OF TIOARD ADJUSTMENT (VAR) 2002-00017 Community(DeveCopment Shaping Better Community CINGULAR COMMUNICATIONS MONOPOLE TOWER 120 DAYS = 9/17/2002 SECTION I. APPLICATION SUMMARY FILE NAME: CINGULAR COMMUNICATIONS MONOPOLE TOWER CASE NOS.: Site Development Review (SDR) SDR2002-00007 Adjustment (VAR) VAR2002-00017 PROPOSAL: The applicant is proposing to construct an 80-foot monopole tower. The associated accessory equipment will be placed within an existing storage unit. An adjustment has been requested seeking relief from the requirement that the wireless communication facility enclosure be screened by landscaping. APPLICANT: Salmon PcS, Inc. OWNER: SSC Property Holdings 123 NE 3' Ave, Suite 240 1155 Bailey Street, #440 Portland, OR 97232 Seattle, WA 98109 APPLICANT'S REP: Mericom Corporation Attn: Ed Fournier 25977 SW Canyon Creek Road, Suite E Wilsonville, OR 97070 LOCATION: 15700 SW Pacific Highway; WCTM 2S110DC, Tax Lot 00300. The subject site is located within the existing Shurgard Storage Center, north of Durham Road. ZONE: C-G: General Commercial District. The C-G zoning district is designed to accommodate a full range of retail, office and civic uses with a City-wide and even regional trade area; except where non-conforming, residential uses are limited to single-family residences which are located on the same site as a permitted use. A wide range of uses, including but not limited to adult entertainment, automotive equipment repair and storage, mini-warehouses, utilities, heliports, medical centers, major event entertainment, and gasoline stations, are permitted conditionally. APPLICABLE REVIEW CRITERIA: Community Development Code Chapters 18.370, 18.390, 18.520, 18.705, 18.730, 18.745, 18.765, 18.795 and 18.798. SECTION II . DECISION Notice is hereby given that the City of Tigard Community Development Director's designee has APPROVED the above Site Development Review request subject to certain conditions of approval. The findings and conclusions on which the decision is based are noted in the full decision, available at City Hall. THIS APPROVAL SHALL BE VALID FOR 18 MONTHS FROM THE EFFECTIVE DATE OF THIS DECISION. All documents and applicable criteria in the above-noted file are available for inspection at no cost or copies can be obtained for twenty-five cents (25 ) per page, or the current rate charged for copies at the time of the request. SECTION III. PROCEDURE AND APPEAL INFORMATION Notice: Not a mailed to: X The applicant and owners X Owner of record within the required distance X Affected government agencies Final Decision: THIS DECISION IS FINAL ON JUNE 27, 2002 AND BECOMES EFFECTIVE ON JULY 13, 2002 UNLESS AN APPEAL IS FILED. A eal: The Director's Decision is final on the date that it is mailed. All persons entitled to notice or who are otherwise adversely affected or aggrieved by the decision as provided in Section 18.390.040.G.1 may appeal this decision in accordance with Section 18.390.040.G.2 of the Tigard Community Development Code which provides that a written appeal together with the required fee shall be filed with the Director within ten (10) business days of the date the Notice of Decision was mailed. The appeal fee schedule and forms are available from the Planning Division of Tigard City Hall, 13125 SW Hall Boulevard, Tigard, Oregon 97223. Unless the applicant is the appellant, the hearing on an appeal from the Director's Decision shall be confined to the specific issues identified in the written comments submitted by the parties during the comment period. Additional evidence concerning issues properly raised in the Notice of Appeal may be submitted by any party during the appeal hearing, subject to any additional rules of procedure that may be adopted from time to time by the appellate body. I THE DEADLINE FOR FILING AN APPEAL IS 5:00 PM ON JULY, 12, 2002. Questions: For further information please contact the Planning Division Staff Planner, Morgan Tracy at (503) 639-4171, Tigard City Hall, 13125 SW Hall Boulevard, Tigard, Oregon 97223. JI/)- - . � aP - iiV ). iv ii VICINITY MAP ■ v Imo, .I Iallitij Pm SDR2002 00007 A �„ - VAR2002-00017 r 4*•�* �� a_--,..,,6 ��®.® CINGULAR WIRELESS rN� ,;I� '�♦�: ,;.E0 mil own MONOPOLE TOWER L"iir•tall: 111 ,,...,_. • . 4. • Ile at • .CA oil, 4A .I,.. �j�,,. =, ' / g lip ..q.011„. FY , , ,,,,,t - rvuiw.0 qn Q`Y, Ciry o® .72 En I / ci I . . •n.0 rr.a..r•/ II"IP f-fl nriar=ara .. 9P ge - •/ 0• 411111=111N 1111=2.111111 :i itr / I - „.r OVERALL SITE PLAN s TIGARD ,..../..1.• �. OnOF ■T RD t SDR2002-00007NAR2002.00017 SITE PLAN N CINGULAR WIRELESS MONOPOLE TOWER (Map Is not to scale) _ 2S110DC-90072 2S110DC-90472 £ I B ADAMS BARBARA ARDEN CARSON HAZEL M TR • 15695 SW 114TH CT#7 15522 SW 114TH CT#47 TIGARD,OR 97224 TIGARD,OR 97224 2S 110D C-90161 2S 110DC-90142 ALLEN JOHN D&JACKIE F CHRISTENSON ROBERT FOX 15605 SW 114TH CT#16 CHRISTENSON SUSAN V TIGARD,OR 97224 15655 SW 114TH CT TIGARD,OR 97224 2S 110CA-01701 2S 110DC-90042 ATLANTIC RICHFIELD COMPANY CLUTTS CHARLES L AND PS&T TAX DEPT SS#01175-11 JOAN B PO BOX 2485 15695 SW 114TH CT UNIT 4 LOS ANGELES,CA 90051 TIGARD,OR 97224 2S 110 DC-90531 2S 110 DC-00700 BELKNAP VIENNA H CONGREGATE CARE ASSET V LTD PTN 15518 SW 114TH CT#53 BY FALCON FINANCIAL TIGARD,OR 97224 PO BOX 12188 SALEM,OR 97309 2S1 10CD-0011 1 Si 10 DC-00600 BOBOSKY JUDEEN CO REGA CARE ASSET V LTD PTN BY FIRST AMERICAN REAL ESTATE TAX S BY FAL.. FINANCIAL COMMERCIAL TAX PO :4X 12 :8 8435 N STEMMONS FREEWAY •LEM,OR 9 309 DALLAS,TX 75247 2S 110DC-90191 2S1 10D C-90271 BOLLINGER JESSIE LEE DAHL STANLEY F&THELMA J 15605 SE 114TH CT#19 15525 SW 114TH CT#27 TIGARD,OR 97224 TIGARD,OR 97224 2S 110DC-90292 2S 110DC-90111 BORK BRUCE A&MARGARET A DOMGORGEN IRMGARD& 15525 SW 14TH CT#29 WALTER ROSIE TIGARD,OR 97224 15655 SW 114TH CT#11 TIGARD,OR 97224 2S110DC-90021 2S110DC-90182 BOYLES HELEN A TRUSTEE DOMREIS LIONEL A W TRUSTEE 15695 SW 114TH CT#2 15605 SW 114TH CT#18 TIGARD,OR 97224 TIGARD,OR 97224 2S 110D C-90262 S 110DC-900 BURNETT RALPH A&NANCY A F T S AT SUMMERFIELD CONDO P 15565 SW 114TH CT#26 OW OF UNITS TIGARD,OR 97224 0 2S 110D C-90311 110D B-900 I. CALLANTINE JEANNE M TR& FO■ T. IS AT SUMMERFIELD CONDO P CALLANTINE DANIEL W TR OW ' ' ! UNITS 15525 SW 114TH CT#31 , • TIGARD,OR 97223 • 2S 110DC-90482 2S 110CD-07800 FREDRICKS MARY JANE TRUSTEE KAADY CHARLES 15522 SW 114TH CT#48 7400 SW BARBUR BLVD TIGARD,OR 97224 PORTLAND,OR 97219 2S 1100 B-90381 2S 110CD-07.I 0 FROST LENA D •■•eY ' ARLES 15485 SW 114TH CT UNIT 38 740! BARBUR BLVD TIGARD,OR 97223 '•RTLA : OR 97219 2S 110D C-90461 26 110D B-90371 HALL JOYCE IRENE TRUST KINCAID JUANITA BY HALL JOYCE I& 9850 SW HAWTHORNE LANE JACOBS THOMAS C TRUSTEES PORTLAND,OR 97225 15522 SW 114TH CT TIGARD,OR 97224 2S11000-90231 2S11000-02400 HARNS JAMES R&PATRICIA S LAYTON PROPERTIES LLC 14106 PENNYSTONE DR BY NORRIS&STEVENS INC SUN CITY WEST,AZ 85375 520 SW SIXTH AVE STE 400 PORTLAND,OR 97204 2S 110DC-90541 2S110DC-02300 HART MARGERY L& LA ON P-•PERTIES NO 2 LLC HART STEVEN CRAIG TRUSTEES BY NO-.:IS&STEVENS INC 15518 SW 114TH CT 520 : 6T •VE STE 400 TIGARD,OR 97224 PORTLAND,OR 97204 2S11000-90562 2S110DC-90501 HAYMAN BERNIECE I TRUST LDF TRUST 15518 SW 114TH CT#56 BY LONNIE D FOSTER TR TIGARD,OR 97224 6168 ROSEMEADOW LN NE SALEM,OR 97301 23 110DC-90252 2S 110DC-90102 HOWARD CLARA M LEVIN ESTHER H 15565 SW 114TH CT#25 15655 SW 114TH#10 TIGARD,OR 97224 TIGARD,OR 97224 2S1 10D C-90552 2S 110DC-90032 HOWARD JEWEL M LUKE BERNICE& 15518 SW 114TH CT#55 ALLEN JACKIE F TIGARD,OR 97224 15695 SW 114TH CT UNIT 3 TIGARD,OR 97224 2S 11000-90011 2S 11000-00500 HOWELLS JOHN& ELIZABETH ANN LUTON ROBERT C 2027 N FOREST CT c/o KVERNLAND ERIC B CANBY,OR 97013 11445 SW SUMMERFIELD DR TIGARD,OR 97224 2S1 100 C-90491 2S 110DC-90212 HUGHES STANLEY F TRUSTEE MACKEY ROBERT A/MARCIA J TRS 15522 SW 114TH CT 15605 SW 114TH CT#21 TIGARD,OR 97224 TIGARD,OR 97224 2S 110DC-90091 2S110DC-90222 MARSHALL MARY RUTH& MILLER PATTY G GEORGE L JR 15605 SW 114TH CT#22 2560 AGATE ST TIGARD,OR 97224 EUGENE,OR 97403 2S110DC-90512 2S110DC-90151 MATTILA ERNEST L NEILS ELDOR S 15522 SW 114TH CT#51 NEILS CAROLYN H TIGARD,OR 97224 10330 W THUNDERBIRD BLVD APT C210 SUN CITY,AZ 85351 2S110DC-90051 2S110DC-02100 MAY JOHN&JACQUELINE PORTLAND METRO PARTNERS 15695 SW 114TH CT UNIT 5 BY STERLING DEVELOPMENT CORP TIGARD,OR 97224 LA JOLLA CORPORATE CENTER 3252 HOLIDAY CT STE 225 LA JOLLA,CA 92037 2S1 10CD-00106 2S1 10 DC-90332 MCCANN CAREL V JR RAMSTHEL MABEL J 15685 SW 116TH 15525 SW 114TH CT#33 KING CITY,OR 97224 TIGARD,OR 97223 2S1 100 C-90201 2S1 10 DC-90522 MCDANIEL JUANITA M& RECKERS CHARLES W AND REX A MARGARET J TRUSTEES 15605 SW 114TH CT 15522 SW 114TH CT#52 TIGARD,OR 97224 TIGARD,OR 97224 2S 110DC-90342 2S1 10 DC-90321 MCDONALD RUTH S TRUSTEE RENDER JEANNE N 15525 SW 114TH CT#34 15525 SW 114TH CT TIGARD,OR 97224 TIGARD,OR 97224 2S 110DC-90121 2S 110DC-90281 MCLELLAN BEATRICE C ROBBERSON DOUGLAS L& 15655 SW 114TH COURT#12 SUSAN K TIGARD,OR 97224 15525 SW 114TH CT TIGARD,OR 97224 2S 110DB-90362 2S 110DC-90602 MCMULLEN RICHARD D AND ROGERS THOMAS T/LA VERNE GERTRUDE M TRUSTEES 15518 SW 114TH CT#60 15485 SW 114TH CT#36 TIGARD,OR 97224 TIGARD,OR 97224 2S1 10 DB-90442 2S 110DC-90592 MESSINGER EDWARD J AND ANN B ROTH ROBERT E&MAE L 15483 SW 114TH CT#44 15518 SW 114TH CT#59 TIGARD,OR 97224 TIGARD,OR 97224 2S 110DC-90451 2S 110DC-90172 METZGER ELNA L TRUSTEE RUDE SHIRLEY M& 15522 SW 114TH CT#45 CASWELL JEANNE M/MERRILL ERIC M& TIGARD,OR 97224 CASWELL TIMOTHY A/CASWELL PAULA 15605 SW 114TH CT#17 TIGARD,OR 97224 2S 110DC-90571 2S 110DC-90061 RYAN THOMAS E&JOAN M TRUSTEES THOMAS CLEMENTINE C CO-TR& 15518 SW 114TH CT#57 THOMAS HOLLIS E CO-TR& TIGARD,OR 97224 THOMAS CYNTHIA J CO-TR 15695 SW 114TH CT#6 TIGARD,OR 97224 2S110DB-90392 2S110DC-02200 SCHENK SOPHIA M TIGARD CENTER LP 15485 SW 114TH CT#39 BY BARCLAY'S REALTY&MNGT CO TIGARD,OR 97224 9777 WILSHIRE BLVD STE 1009 BEVERLY HILLS,CA 90212 2S110DB-90351 2S110DB-90402 SCHROEDER MARJORY E TRUSTEE TILLINGHAST RUTH P TRUSTEE 15485 SW 114TH CT#35 15485 SW 114TH#40 TIGARD,OR 97224 TIGARD,OR 97224 2S110DC-00300 2S110CD-07600 SSC PROPERTY HOLDINGS INC TOBIAS INVESTMENT CO BY PTA LLC-SHUR#38004 300 SE SPOKANE ST PO BOX 19156 PORTLAND,OR 97202 ALEXANDRIA,VA 22320 2S110DC-90132 110CD-075 0 STAYTON BARBARA JANE TO S VESTMENT CO 15655 SW 114TH CT#13 300 KANE ST TIGARD,OR 97224 P RTLAND,OR 97202 2S110DB-90432 2S110CD-00105 STURGESS MARGARET I UNITED STATES NATIONAL BANK 15483 SW 114TH CT#43 BY US BANK PROPERTIES TIGARD,OR 97224 2800 EAST LAKE ST MINNEAPOLIS,MN 55406 2S 110D C-01000 2S 110DC-90241 SUMMERFIELD ASSOCIATES LLC VETTERLEIN CATHRYN J TRUST BY HSC REAL ESTATE 15565 SW 114TH CT#24 1500 SW FIRST AVE STE 1020 TIGARD,OR 97223 PORTLAND,OR 97201 110D D-00109 2S 110D C-90302 SU ERFI• D ASSOCIATES LLC ZIEGELMAYER FRANCES M TRUSTEE BY HS► EAL ESTATE 15525 SW 114TH CT#30 150! W F ' T AVE STE 1020 TIGARD,OR 97224 •RTLAND,OR 97201 2S 110DC-90082 TENNENT MELVIN G/JANE B 15695 SW 114TH CT#8 TIGARD,OR 97224 2S110DC-90581 TENTO ELEANOR E 15518 SW 114TH CT#58 TIGARD,OR 97224 Jack Biethan 11023 SW Summerfield Drive, #4 Tigard, OR 97224 Kristen Miller 8940 SW Edgewood Street Tigard, OR 97223 Paul Owen 10335 SW Highland Drive Tigard, OR 97224 Louise Fronville 15760 SW Oak Meadow Lane Tigard, OR 97224 Tim Esav PO Box 230695 Tigard, OR 97281 Nathan and Ann Murdock PO Box 231265 Tigard, OR 97281 Ross Sundberg 16382 SW 104th Avenue Tigard, OR 97224 CITY OF TIGARD - SOUTH CIT SUBCOMMITTEE (pg. I of I) (i:\curpin\setup\labels\CIT South.doc) UPDATED: January 11, 2002 AFFIDAVIT OF MAILING CITY OF n.ARD Community Development Shaping A Better Community I, cPatricia L. Lunsford, being first duly sworn/affirm, on oath depose and say that I am a Senior Administrative Specialist for the City of 7igar Washington County, Oregon and that I served the following: (Check Appropriate Box(s)Bebw) © NOTICE OF DECISION FOR: SDR2002-00007/VAR2002-00017 — CINGULAR COMMUNICATIONS MONOPOLE TOWER ❑ AMENDED NOTICE (File No/Name Reference) ® City of Tigard Planning Director A copy of the said notice being hereto attached, marked Exhibit"A",and by reference made a part hereof, was mailed to each named person(s) at the address(s) shown on the attached list(s), marked Exhibit"B",and by reference made a part hereof, on lune 27,2002, and deposited in the United States Mail on lune 27,2002, postage prepaid. A. i - (Person that Prep-•-d Notice) STATE OE oEGoN ) County of`Washington )ss. City of Tigard ) Subscribed and sworn/affirmed before me on the 3 day of ( , 2002. OFFICIAL SEAL ,. DIANE M JELDERKS NOTARY PUBLIC°.R3 EG5078N `MY COMM MON EXP RES SEPT.07,2003 HO RV PUBLIC OF OREG My Commission Expir 9/V0,3 EXHPT f ., NOTICE OF TYPE II DECISION SITE DEVELOPMENT REVIEW (SDR) 2002-00007 �« ADJUSTMENT (VAR) 2002-00017 CITY OFTIGARD CINGULAR COMMUNICATIONS MONOPOLE TOWER CommunityDeveropment Shaping Better Community 120 DAYS = 9/17/2002 SECTION I. APPLICATION SUMMARY FILE NAME: CINGULAR COMMUNICATIONS MONOPOLE TOWER CASE NOS.: Site Development Review (SDR) SDR2002-00007 Adjustment (VAR) VAR2002-00017 PROPOSAL: The applicant is proposing to construct an 80-foot monopole tower. The associated accessory equipment will be placed within an existing storage unit. An adjustment has been requested seeking relief from the requirement that the wireless communication facility enclosure be screened by landscaping. APPLICANT: Salmon PCcS, Inc. OWNER: SSC Property Holdings 123 NE 3r Ave, Suite 240 1155 Bailey Street, #440 Portland, OR 97232 Seattle, WA 98109 APPLICANT'S REP: Mericom Corporation Attn: Ed Fournier 25977 SW Canyon Creek Road, Suite E Wilsonville, OR 97070 LOCATION: 15700 SW Pacific Highway; WCTM 2S110DC, Tax Lot 00300. The subject site is located within the existing Shurgard Storage Center, north of Durham Road. ZONE: C-G: General Commercial District. The C-G zoning.district is designed to accommodate a full range of retail, office and civic uses with a City- wide and even regional trade area; except where non-conforming, residential uses are limited to single-family residences which are located on the same site as a permitted use. A wide range of uses, including but not limited to adult entertainment, automotive equipment repair and storage, mini-warehouses, utilities, heliports, medical centers, major event entertainment, and gasoline stations, are permitted conditionally. APPLICABLE REVIEW CRITERIA: Community Development Code Chapters 18.370, 18.390, 18.520, 18.705, 18.730, 18.745, 18.765, 18.795 and 18.798. SECTION II. DECISION Notice is hereby given that the City of Tigard Community Development Director's designee has APPROVED the above request subject to certain conditions of approval. The findings and conclusions on which the decision is based are noted in Section VI. NOTICE OF TYPE II DECISION SDR2002-00007/CINGULAR COMMUNICATIONS MONOPOLE PAGE 1 OF 22 CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL THE FOLLOWING CONDITIONS SHALL BE SATISFIED PRIOR TO THE ISSUANCE OF SITE/BUILDING PERMITS: Submit to the Planning Division (Morgan Tracy, 503-639-4171, ext. 2428) for review and approval: 1. The applicant/owner shall provide a revised site plan that shows the addition of two medium to large sized street trees (minimum 2" caliper size at planting) located to the south of the primary access driveway. Such street trees shall be installed prior to final building permit approval. 2. The applicant shall submit a revised elevation drawing indicating the color of the proposed monopole. Unless the applicant has been directed by the FAA, the color of the monopole shall be a non-reflective galvanized gray finish. 3. The applicant shall provide documentation regarding the noise levels in decibel ratings for the proposed air conditioning units that shows the levels to be below 50 dBA (day)/40 dBA(night) measured at the property line. 4. The applicant/owner shall provide satisfactory legal evidence, in the form of deeds, easements, leases or contracts to establish the joint access. 5. The applicant/owner shall certify that he/she agrees to ensure that the perimeter landscaping is maintained, and should the plants be irreparably damaged, removed, or die, the applicant/owner shall replace the plants in number and type with the largest commercially available similar species, a minimum of 12 feet in height. Submit to the Engineering Department (Brian Rager, 639-4171, ext. 2471) for review and approval: 6. Prior to issuance of a site permit, a public facility improvement permit will be required if any work is to occur in the public right-of-way. If no work within the right-of- way is necessary, this condition will not apply. 7. An erosion control plan shall be provided as part of the public improvement drawings. The plan shall conform to "Erosion Prevention and Sediment Control Plans - Technical Guidance Handbook, February 1994." THE FOLLOWING CONDITIONS SHALL BE SATISFIED PRIOR TO A FINAL BUILDING INSPECTION: Submit to the Engineering Department (Brian Rager, 639-4171, ext. 2471) for review and approval: 8. The applicant/owner shall follow the recommendations of the arborist report and maintain a minimum 8 feet separation between the trees and the utility excavation. 9. Prior to a final building inspection, the applicant shall complete any work in the public right-of-way (or public easement) and obtain approval from the Engineering Department. THIS APPROVAL SHALL BE VALID FOR EIGHTEEN (18) MONTHS FROM THE EFFECTIVE DATE OF THIS DECISION. SECTION III. BACKGROUND INFORMATION Site History: Staff conducted a search of City records for the subject property. A conditional use approval was granted in 1988 (Case File No. CU 88-09) for the Shurgard Storage mini warehouse use. Also, a sign permit and associate electrical permits were granted in 1997 for the freestanding sign on SW Pacific Highway. No other land use cases associated with this parcel were found. NOTICE OF TYPE II DECISION SDR2002-00007/CINGULAR COMMUNICATIONS MONOPOLE PAGE 2 OF 22 This parcel and surrounding properties to the north and south are zoned C-G with a planned development overlay. Properties to the east are zoned R-25 and are developed with multi- family units. To the west is King City with commercial properties fronting SW Pacific Highway. Vicinity Information: The subject site is located between Durham Road and Royalty Parkway, on the east side of SW Pacific Highway. Site Information and Proposal Description: The applicant is proposing to construct an 80-foot tall monopole tower for wireless communications service. The applicant has also requested an adjustment to the requirement that the perimeter of the tower enclosure be landscaped. SECTION IV. COMMENTS FROM PROPERTY OWNERS WITHIN 500 FEET One letter was received from a nearby property owner. This letter raises concerns about the aesthetic impacts of the tall tower structure, radio frequency interference, and the long-term viability of the existing landscaping around the site. RESPONSE: The wireless communication facility is an outright permitted use in the commercial zones. The code specifies several requirements to limit the impact of these facilities including a height limit of 100 feet for single carrier poles, requiring the pole be painted a dull gray finish to help blend the structure into the background sky, and a setback equal to the height of the tower from property lines. Staff concurs that there remain visual impacts from these facilities; however, these sites are part of what is becoming an essential service (mobile phones) and are necessary to deliver this service. Radio frequency interference issues are under the purview of the Federal Communications Commission. Local government is not empowered to regulate the frequency spectrum; however, should there be instances of interference, the FCC Enforcement Bureau is responsible for responding to such complaints. Contact: Federal Communications Commission; 11410 NE 122nd Way, Room 312; Kirkland, WA 98034-6927; phone 888-CALL- FCC (225-5322). Lastly, with regard to the landscaping, staff agrees that since the existing landscaping is a basis for approving the requested variance, that assurances for its long-term viability be shouldered by both the property owner, and the applicant. This is discussed in greater detail later in this decision. SECTION V. SUMMARY OF APPLICABLE REVIEW CRITERIA The proposal's consistency with these Code Chapters is reviewed in the following sections: A. Zoning Districts 18.530 (Industrial Zoning Districts) B. Applicable Development Code Standards 18.370 Variances and Adjustments) 18.705 Access Egress and Circulation) 18.745 Landscaping and Screening) 18.765 Off-Street parking and loading requirements) 18.780 Signs) 18.795 Visual Clearance) 18.798 Wireless Communication Facilities) C. Specific DR Approval Criteria 18.360 D. Street and Utility Improvement Standards 18.810 E. Impact Study 18.390 NOTICE OF TYPE II DECISION SDR2002-00007/CINGULAR COMMUNICATIONS MONOPOLE PAGE 3 OF 22 SECTION VI. APPLICABLE DEVELOPMENT CODE STANDARDS A. ZONIING DISTRICT Industrial Zoning District: Section 18.530.020 Lists the description of the Industrial Zoning Districts. The site is located in the C-G: General Commercial District. The proposed use, a Wireless Communications Facility, is permitted in this zone subject to the limitations of Chapter 18.798. Development Standards: Section 18.530.040.B States that Development standards in commercial zoning districts are contained in Table 18.520.2 below: TABLE 18.520.2 DEVELOPMENT STANDARDS IN INDUSTRIAL ZONES STANDARD C-G Proposed Minimum Lot Size None 203,860 sq. ft. - Detached unit - - Boarding, lodging, rooming house Minimum Lot Width 50 ft 246 ft. Minimum Setbacks - Front yard 0 ft. 25 ft. -Side facing street on corner&through lots - - -Side yard 0 ft [1] 20/35 ft. -Side or rear yard abutting more restrictive zoning district - - Rear yard 20 ft [1] 52 ft. - Distance between front of garage & property line abutting a public or - - private street. Maximum Height 45 ft 20 ft. Maximum Site Coverage [2] 85% 85 Minimum Landscape Requirement _ 15% 15% [1]no setback shall be required except 20 feet shall be required where the zone abuts a residential zone. [2]includes all buildings and impervious area The site is comprised of storage buildings and the balance of the site is all paved, with the exception of an approximate 10-foot-wide area for perimeter landscaping around the sides and rear, and a large landscaped area in front. The proposal will not be adding any impervious area since the equipment will be placed inside the existing building and the monopole will be constructed on the existing asphalt. The setbacks to the wireless communication facility exceed those of the underlying zone, with the shortest distance to the property line being 133 feet. FINDING: Based on the analysis above, the underlying zone's development criteria have been satisfied. B. APPLICABLE DEVELOPMENT CODE STANDARDS The Site Development Review approval standards require that a development proposal be found to be consistent with the various standards of the Community Development Code. Variances and Adjustments (18.370): The applicant requested a variance to the landscaping requirements found in TDC Chapter 18.798.050.B.7. This standard requires that: a. Landscaping shall be placed outside the fence and shall consist of evergreen shrubs which reach six feet in height and 95% opacity within three years of planting; NOTICE OF TYPE II DECISION SDR2002-00007/CINGULAR COMMUNICATIONS MONOPOLE PAGE 4 OF 22 b. When adjacent to or within residentially-zoned property, free-standing towers and accessory equipment facilities shall be screened by the planting of a minimum of four evergreen trees at least 15 feet in height at the time of planting. The planting of said trees shall be prescribed in number by a plan prepared by a registered arborist in locations that (1) most effectively screen the wireless facilities from residential uses and (2) promote the future survival of the trees while limiting adverse effects of the trees on abutting properties. Existing evergreen trees at least 15 feet in height may be used to meet the screening requirement of this section if the arborist demonstrates that they provide screening for abutting residential uses. In order to grant relief from a requirement, the applicant must demonstrate that the criteria for a variance have been addressed. The criteria for a variance are as follows: a. The proposed variance will not be materially detrimental to the purposes of this title, to any other applicable policies and standards, and to other properties in the same zoning district or vicinity; To find that no detriment will occur by granting relief, it is important to understand the context of the requirement in relation to the specifics of the site. This code provision envisioned wireless communication facilities that would be normally viewable to the general public. The intent of the landscaping was not to obscure the tower, as that is nearly impossible, but to screen the accessory equipment and soften the tower's presence on the site. The current proposal includes housing the accessory equipment inside an existing storage unit, and running the cables out the side of the building and directly into the tower. The site, moreover, is semi private, with a keyed entry gate preventing general public access. Lastly, the entire site perimeter is currently landscaped to provide the general screening of the facility and soften the presence of the tower. This perimeter landscaping provides a better visual screen as it is both taller and closer to the off site viewer. b. There are special circumstances that exist which are peculiar to the lot size or shape, topography or other circumstances over which the applicant has no control, and which are not applicable to other properties in the same zoning district; The site is peculiar in three respects: it is not generally accessible to or viewable to the general public, the area where the tower is proposed is entirely covered in asphalt and buildings limiting the ability to place landscaping, and the existing site perimeter landscaping affords equal, if not better screening than what is otherwise required. The large size of the parcel, in conjunction with the proposed central location of the tower also sets this site apart from others in the district and helps to alleviate the need for the required landscaping. c. The use proposed will be the same as permitted under this title and City standards will be maintained to the greatest extent that is reasonably possible while permitting reasonable economic use of the land; The alleviation from the landscaping requirement will not affect general compliance with other relevant sections of the development code and other City Standards. Compliance with these standards is addressed in this decision. d. Existing physical and natural systems, such as but not limited to traffic, drainage, dramatic land forms or parks will not be adversely affected any more than would occur if the development were developed as specified in the title; and The omission of landscaping at the base of the proposed tower will not be noticeable to any persons beside those who are interior to the site, and are not otherwise obscured by the storage buildings on the property. On site traffic is not affected, drainage will continue to perform as previously designed, and there are no dramatic landforms or parks that would be adversely affected by the requested variance. e. The hardship is not self-imposed and the variance requested is the minimum variance which would alleviate the hardship. NOTICE OF TYPE H DECISION SDR2002-00007/CINGULAR COMMUNICATIONS MONOPOLE PAGE 5 OF 22 The hardship in this case can be characterized as the lack of available space around the tower enclosure to provide landscaping and accommodate vehicle access and circulation. Also, the relatively isolated location of the required landscaping creates difficulties for maintenance and long term continued care. The hardship is the result of previous development decisions made for the property with respect to building and driveway placement, as well as the requirement that the tower be setback a distance equal to its height. This prevents locating the tower near areas of existing landscaping and away from the expanse of asphalt. The applicant's request is the minimum practicable to alleviate the hardship FINDING: Based on the analysis provided above, the applicant's request meets the criteria for granting the variance. However, this finding is based on the presence of existing landscaping. To ensure the long-term continued presence of the existing landscape buffer, a condition shall be imposed. CONDITION: The applicant/owner shall ensure that the perimeter landscaping is maintained, and should the plants be irreparably damaged, removed, or die, the applicant/owner shall replace the plants in number and type with the largest commercially available similar species, a minimum of 12 feet in height. Access, Egress and Circulation (18.705): Access plan: No building or other permit shall be issued until scaled plans are presented and approved as provided by this chapter that show how access, egress and circulation requirements are to be fulfilled. The applicant shall submit a site plan. The Director shall provide the applicant with detailed information about this submission requirement. The applicant has provided scaled plans showing access, egress and circulation for the proposed monopole from SW Pacific Highway, which is a public street. Joint access: Owners of two or more uses, structures, or parcels of land may agree to utilize jointly the same access and egress when the combined access and egress of both uses, structures, or parcels of land satisfies the combined requirements as designated in this title, provided: Satisfactory legal evidence shall be presented in the form of deeds, easements, leases or contracts to establish the joint use; and copies of the deeds, easements, leases or contracts are placed on permanent file with the City. The applicant has proposed to utilize the existing site access and jointly share the driveway to the wireless communication facility site. An access easement will be required. Public street access: All vehicular access and egress as required in Sections 18.705.030H and 18.705.0301 shall connect directly with a public or private street approved by the City for public use and shall be maintained at the required standards on a continuous basis. The subject site is accessible from SW Pacific Highway, an improved public street that meets standards for public streets. Curb cuts: Curb cuts shall be in accordance with Section 18.810.030N: Concrete curbs, curb cuts, wheelchair, bicycle ramps and driveway approaches shall be constructed in accordance with standards specified in this chapter and Section 15.04.080: Concrete curbs and driveway approaches are required; except where no sidewalk is planned, an asphalt approach may be constructed with City Engineer approval and Asphalt and concrete driveway approaches to the property line shall be built to City configuration standards. The applicant proposes to utilize the existing curb cut and driveway apron, which conform to city standards. NOTICE OF TYPE II DECISION SDR2002-00007/CINGULAR COMMUNICATIONS MONOPOLE PAGE 6 OF 22 Walkways: On-site pedestrian walkways shall comply with the following standards: Walkways shall extend from the ground floor entrances or from the ground floor landing of stairs, ramps, or elevators of all commercial, institutional, and industrial uses, to the streets which provide the required access and egress. Walkways shall provide convenient connections between buildings in multi-building commercial, institutional, and industrial complexes. Unless impractical, walkways shall be constructed between new and existing developments and neighboring developments; The proposed facility is a non-inhabited structure and will be fenced off separately from the rest of the site for security purposes. A walkway connects the storage unit's main office to the sidewalks on the street. Existing rights-of-way provide adequate pedestrian access to the site. Wherever required walkways cross vehicle access driveways or parking lots, such crossings shall be designed and located for pedestrian safety. Required walkways shall be physically separated from motor vehicle traffic and parking by either a minimum 6-inch vertical separation (curbed) or a minimum 3-foot horizontal separation, except that pedestrian crossings of traffic aisles are permitted for distances no greater than 36 feet if appropriate landscaping, pavement markings, or contrasting pavement materials are used. Walkways shall be a minimum of four feet in width, exclusive of vehicle overhangs and obstructions such as mailboxes, benches, bicycle racks, and sign posts, and shall be in compliance with ADA standards; There are no walkways proposed, therefore, this standard is met. Required walkways shall be paved with hard surfaced materials such as concrete, asphalt, stone, brick, etc. Walkways may be required to be lighted and/or signed as needed for safety purposes. Soft-surfaced public use pathways may be provided only if such pathways are provided in addition to required pathways. There are no walkways proposed, therefore, this standard is met. Minimum Access Requirements for Commercial and Industrial Use: Section 18.705.030.1 provides the minimum access requirements for commercial and industrial uses: Table 18.705.3 indicates that the required access width for developments with 0-99 parking spaces is one 30-foot accesses with 24 feet of pavement. Vehicular access shall be provided to commercial or industrial uses, and shall be located within 50 feet of the primary ground floor entrances; additional requirements for truck traffic may be placed as conditions of site development review. The site has its primary access from SW Pacific Highway which is greater than 30 feet wide with more than 24 feet of pavement. The proposed development will not affect any change to the existing primary access point, which is in conformance with the code. The secondary access to SW Pacific Highway is 24 feet wide, but will not be used for access to the cell site, it is for emergency access only. One-way vehicular access points: Where a proposed parking facility indicates only one-way traffic flow on the site, it shall be accommodated by a specific driveway serving the facility; the entrance drive shall be situated closest to oncoming traffic and the exit drive shall be situated farthest from oncoming traffic. The existing primary access accommodates two-way traffic The Director has the authority to restrict access when the need to do so is dictated by one or more of the following conditions: NOTICE OF TYPE II DECISION SDR2002-00007/CINGULAR COMMUNICATIONS MONOPOLE PAGE 7 OF 22 To provide for increased traffic movement on congested streets and to eliminate turning movement problems, the Director may restrict the location of driveways on streets and require the location of driveways be placed on adjacent streets, upon the finding that the proposed access would: • Cause or increase existing hazardous traffic conditions; or • Provide inadequate access for emergency vehicles; or • Cause hazardous conditions to exist-which would constitute a clear and present danger to the public health, safety, and general welfare. To eliminate the need to use public streets for movements between commercial or industrial properties, parking areas shall be designed to connect with parking areas on adjacent properties unless not feasible. The Director shall require access easements between properties where necessary to provide for parking area connections; To facilitate pedestrian and bicycle traffic, access and parking area plans shall provide efficient sidewalk andlor pathway connections, as feasible, between neighboring developments or land uses; The existing access meets present City standards and affords good visibility in both directions of SW Pacific Highway. The subject site has a very small parking area near the front office (off SW Pacific Highway) outside the security fence. The site is surrounded by a chain link fence for security purposes. The proposed cell tower will be surrounded by a second fence for additional security. It is impractical to connect, either with a pedestrian or vehicular connection, other adjacent properties. FINDING: Based on the analysis above, the Access, Egress and Circulation standards have not been fully met, however by imposing the following condition, these standards will be satisfied. CONDITION: The applicant/owner shall provide satisfactory legal evidence, in the form of deeds, easements, leases or contracts to establish the joint access. Environmental Performance Standards (18.725) The purpose of these provisions is to apply the federal and state environmental laws, rules and regulations to development within the City of Tigard. These requirements are intended to prevent or mitigate for adverse environmental- impacts to offsite properties from noise, visible emissions, vibration, odors, insects and rodents, and glare and heat. The proposed wireless communication facility will have the mechanical equipment housed within the adjacent storage unit, limiting potential noise. The use does not generate trash, sewage, wastewater, vibration, odors, or visible emissions. As there will be no trash accumulation, there should be no harboring of insects or rodents. The dull galvanized color will minimize glare. FINDING: Based on the analysis above, and continued obligation of the property owner to adhere to these provisions, this standard is met. Landscaping and Screening (18.745): Street Trees: Section 18.745.040 states that all development projects fronting on a public street or a private drive more than 100 feet in length shall be required to plant street trees in accordance with Section 18.745.040.0 Section 18.745.040.0 requires that street trees be spaced between 20 and 40 feet apart depending on the size classification of the tree at maturity (small, medium or large). This development fronts a public street and is, therefore, required to have street trees. There are two trees along the public right-of-way that serve as street trees, however, the site is deficient in the number of street trees provided. The applicant will need to submit a site plan showing the addition of two trees along the public street frontage. The trees should be medium to large size species, similar to the existing street trees to the north. NOTICE OF TYPE II DECISION SDR2002-00007/CINGULAR COMMUNICATIONS MONOPOLE PAGE 8 OF 22 FINDING: The applicant's plans do not meet the requirement for street trees. CONDITION: The applicant/owner shall provide a revised site plan that shows the addition of two medium to large sized street trees (minimum 2" caliper size at planting) located to the south of the primary access driveway. Such street trees shall be installed prior to final building permit approval. Buffering and Screening: Section 18.745.050 states that buffering, but not screening is required between abutting uses that are of a different type when the uses are separated by a street. No buffer or screening is required between similar uses. The proposed use is located centrally within the commercial property. As such, no buffering and screening is required as the parent parcel and the applicant's proposed use are similar. Buffering exists between the storage site and the multi-family residential properties to the east and southeast. Screening: Special Provisions: Section 18.745.050.E requires the screening of parking and loading areas. Landscaped parking areas shall include special design features which effectively screen the parking lot areas from view. Planting materials fo be installed should achieve a relative balance between low lying and vertical shrubbery and trees. Trees shall be planted in landscaped islands in all parking areas, and shall be equally distributed on the basis of one (1) tree for each seven (7) parking spaces in order to provide a canopy effect. The minimum dimension on the landscape islands shall be three (3) feet wide and the landscaping shall be protected from vehicular damage by some form of wheel guard or curb. The proposed use does not require additional parking. There is no current screening provided for the existing parking lot, as it was developed prior-to the implementation of this requirement. Since no changes to the parking area are proposed or required, no additional screening will be required for this nonconforming aspect of the parking area. Screening Of Service Facilities. Except for one-family and two-family dwellings, any refuse container or disposal area and service facilities such as gas meters and air conditioners which would otherwise be visible from a public street, customer or resident parking area, any public facility or any residential area shall be screened from view by placement of a solid wood fence or masonry wall between five and eight feet in height. All refuse materials shall be contained within the screened area; Service facilities are not needed for the proposed use, and have not been proposed. FINDING: Based on the analysis above, the landscaping and screening standards of this section have been met. Mixed Solid Waste and Recyclables Storage (18.755): Chapter 18.755 requires that new construction incorporates functional and adequate space for on-site storage and efficient collection of mixed solid waste and source separated Recyclables prior to pick-up and removal by haulers. The applicant must choose one (1) of the following four (4) methods to demonstrate compliance: Minimum Standard, Waste Assessment, Comprehensive Recycling Plan, or Franchised Hauler Review and Sign-Off. The applicant will have to submit evidence or a plan which indicates compliance with this section. Regardless of which method chosen, the applicant will have to submit a written sign-off from the franchise hauler regarding the facility location and compatibility. No mixed solid waste collection or recyclables storage is needed for this use. No changes to the site's existing refuse collection area are proposed. NOTICE OF TYPE II DECISION SDR2002-00007/CINGULAR COMMUNICATIONS MONOPOLE PAGE 9 OF 22 Location Standards. To encourage its use, the storage area for source-separated recyclable shall be co- located with the storage area for residual mixed solid waste; Indoor and outdoor storage areas shall comply with Uniform Building and Fire Code requirements; Storage area space requirements can be satisfied with a single location or multiple locations, and can combine both interior and exterior locations; Exterior storage areas can be located within interior side yard or rear yard areas. Exterior storage areas shall not be located within a required front yard setback or in a yard adjacent to a public or private street; Exterior storage areas shall be located in central and visible locations on a site to enhance security for users; Exterior storage areas can be located in a parking.area if the proposed use provides at least the minimum number of parking spaces required for the use after deducting the area used for storage. Storage areas shall be appropriately screened according .to the provisions in 18.755.050 C, design standards; The storage area shall be accessible for collection vehicles and located so that the storage area will not obstruct pedestrian or vehicle traffic movement on the site or on public streets adjacent to the site. No mixed solid waste collection or recyclables storage is needed for this use. Therefore, this standard is met. Design Standards. The dimensions of the storage area shall accommodate containers consistent with current methods of local collection; Storage containers shall meet Uniform Fire Code standards and be made and covered with waterproof materials or situated in a covered area; Exterior storage areas shall be enclosed by a sight-obscuring fence wall, or hedge at least six feet in height. Gate openings which allow access to users and haulers shall be provided. Gate openings for haulers shall be a minimum of 10 feet wide and shall be capable of being secured in a closed and open position; Storage area(s) and containers shall be clearly labeled to indicate the type of materials accepted. No mixed solid waste collection or recyclables storage is needed for this use. Therefore, this standard is met. FINDING: Based on the analysis above, the Mixed Solid Waste & Recyclables Storage Standards have been met. Off-Street Parking and Loading (18.765): Location of vehicle parking: Off-street parking spaces for single-family and duplex dwellings and single-family attached dwellings shall be located on the same lot with the dwellings. Off-street parking lots for uses not listed above shall be located not further than 200 feet from the building or use that they are required to serve, measured in a straight line from the building with the following exceptions: a) commercial and industrial uses which require more than 40 parking spaces may provide for the spaces in excess of the required first 40 spaces up to a distance of 300 feet from the primary site; The 40 parking spaces which remain on the primary site must be available for users in the following order of priority: 1) Disabled-accessible spaces; 2) Short-term spaces; 3) Long-term preferential carpool and vanpool spaces; 4) Long-term spaces. No parking is required for the proposed use. Therefore, this standard is met. Joint Parking_ Owners of two or more uses, structures or parcels of land may agree to utilize jointly the same parking and loading spaces when the peak hours of operation do not overlay, subject to the following: 1) The size of the joint parking facility shall be at least as large as the number of vehicle parking spaces required by the larger(est) use per Section 18.765.070; 2) Satisfactory legal evidence shall be presented to the Director in the form of deeds, leases or contracts to establish the joint use; 3) If a joint use arrangement is subsequently terminated, or if the uses change, the requirements of this title thereafter apply to each separately. NOTICE OF TYPE II DECISION SDR2002-00007/CINGULAR COMMUNICATIONS MONOPOLE PAGE 10 OF 22 Joint parking is not proposed with this application. Therefore, this standard does not apply. Parking in Mixed-Use Projects: In mixed-use projects, the required minimum vehicle parking shall be determined using the following formula. 1) Primary use, i.e., that with the largest proportion of total floor area within the development, at 100% of the minimum vehicle parking required for that use in Section 18.765.060; 2) Secondary use, i.e., that with the second largest percentage of total floor area within the develo ment, at 90% of the vehicle parking required gfor that use in Section 18.765.060; 3 Subsequent use or uses, at 80 0 of th vehicle parking required for that use(s) in Section 18.765.060; 4) The maximum parking allowance shall be 150% of the total minimum parking as calculated in D.1.-3. above. The project is not considered a mixed-use project. Therefore, this standard does not apply. Visitor Parking in Multi-Family Residential Developments: Multi-dwelling units with more than 10 required parking spaces shall provide an additional 15% of vehicle parking spaces above the minimum required for the use of guests of residents of the complex. These spaces shall be centrally located or distributed throughout the development. Required bicycle parking facilities shall also be centrally located within or evenly distributed throughout the development. This project does not involve a residential use. Therefore, this standard does not apply. Preferential Long-Term CarpoolNanpool Parking: Parking lots providing in excess of 20 long-term parking spaces shall provide preferential long-term carpool and vanpool parking for employees, students and other regular visitors to the site. At least 5% of total long-term parking spaces shall be reserved for carpool/vanpool use. Preferential parking for carpools/vanpools shall be closer to the main entrances of the building than any other employee or student parking except parking spaces designated for use by the disabled. Preferential carpool/vanpool spaces shall be full-sized per requirements in Section 18.765.040N and shall be clearly designated for use only by carpools and vanpools between 7:00 AM and 5:30 PM Monday through Friday. No parking is required for the proposed use. Therefore, no carpool/vanpool stalls are required. Disabled-Accessible Parking: All parking areas shall be provided with the required number of parking spaces for disabled persons as specified by the State of Oregon Uniform Building Code and federal standards. Such parking spaces shall be sized, signed and marked as required by these regulations. No parking is required for the proposed use. The facility is not intended for public access and is, therefore, exempt from ADA accessibility requirements. Therefore, this standard has been met. Access Drives: With regard to access to public streets from off-street parking: access drives from the street to off-street parking or loading areas shall be designed and constructed to facilitate the flow of traffic and provide maximum safety for pedestrian and vehicular traffic on the site; the number and size of access drives shall be in accordance with the requirements of Chapter, 18.705, Access, Egress and Circulation; access drives shall be clearly and permanently marked and defined through use of rails, fences, walls or other barriers or markers on frontage not occupied by service drives; access drives shall have a minimum vision clearance in accordance with Chapter 18.795, Visual Clearance; access drives shall be improved with an asphalt or concrete surface; and excluding single-family and duplex residences, except as provided by Subsection 18.810.030.P, groups of two or more parking spaces shall be served by a service drive so that no backing movements or other maneuvering within a street or other public right-of-way will be required. NOTICE OF TYPE II DECISION SDR2002-00007/CINGULAR COMMUNICATIONS MONOPOLE PAGE 11 OF 22 No changes to the primary access are proposed. Pedestrian Access: Pedestrian access through parking lots shall be provided in accordance with Section 18.705.030.F. Where a parking area or other vehicle area has a drop-off grade separation, the property owner shall install a wall, railing, or other barrier which will prevent a slow-moving vehicle or driverless vehicle from escaping such area and which will prevent pedestrians from walking over drop-off edges. There are no changes proposed to the parking and there are no pedestrian destinations that would necessitate pedestrian access from the parking lot. Parking Lot Striping: Except for single-family and duplex residences, any area intended to be used to meet the off-street parking requirements as contained in this Chapter shall have all parking spaces clearly marked; and all interior drives and access aisles shall be clearly marked and signed to show direction of flow and maintain vehicular and pedestrian safety. There are no changes proposed to the parking area and no parking is required for the proposed use. Therefore, this standard has been met. Wheel Stops: Parking spaces along the boundaries of a parking lot or adjacent to interior landscaped areas or sidewalks shall be provided with a wheel stop at least four inches high located three feet back from the front of the parking stall. The front three feet of the parking stall may be concrete, asphalt or low lying landscape material that does not exceed the height of the wheel stop. This area cannot be calculated to meet landscaping or sidewalk requirements. There are no changes proposed to the parking area and no parking is required for the proposed use. Therefore, this standard has been met. Space and Aisle Dimensions: Section 18.765.040.N states that: "except as modified for angled parking in Figures 18.765.1 and 18.765.2 the minimum dimensions for parking spaces are: 8.5 feet x 18.5 feet for a standard space and 7.5 feet x 16.5 feet for a compact space; aisles accommodating two direction traffic, or allowing access from both ends, shall be 24 feet in width. There are no changes proposed to the parking area and no parking is required for the proposed use. Therefore, this standard has been met. Bicycle Parking Location and Access: Section 18.765.050 states bicycle parking areas shall be provided at locations within 50 feet of primary entrances to structures; bicycle parking areas shall not be located within parking aisles, landscape areas or pedestrian ways; outdoor bicycle parking shall be visible from on-site buildings and/or the street. When the bicycle parking area is not visible from the street, directional signs shall be used to locate the parking area; and bicycle parking may be located inside a building on a floor which has an outdoor entrance open for use and floor location which does not require the bicyclist to use stairs to gain access to the space. Exceptions may be made to the latter requirement for parking on upper stories within a multi-story residential building. There are no changes proposed to the parking area and no bicycle parking is required for the proposed use. Therefore, this standard has been met. It should be noted that the self storage use is nonconforming with respect to bicycle parking, but as this proposal does not increase the degree of the nonconformity (such as creating additional storage units) and the proposed use does not require bicycle spaces, no bicycle parking will be required. NOTICE OF TYPE II DECISION SDR2002-00007/CINGULAR COMMUNICATIONS MONOPOLE PAGE 12 OF 22 Bicycle Parking Design Requirements: Section 18.765.050.C. The following design requirements apply to the installation of bicycle racks: The racks required for required bicycle parking spaces shall ensure that bicycles may be securely locked to them without undue inconvenience. Provision of bicycle lockers for long-term (employee) parking is encouraged but not required; bicycle racks must be securely anchored to the ground, wall or other structure; bicycle parking spaces shall be at least 21/2 feet by six feet long, and, when covered, with a vertical clearance of seven feet. An access aisle of at least five feet wide shall be provided and maintained beside or between each row of bicycle parking; each required bicycle parking space must be accessible without moving another bicycle; required bicycle parking spaces may not be rented or leased except where required motor vehicle parking is rented or leased. At-cost or deposit fees for bicycle parking are exempt from this requirement; and areas set aside for required bicycle parking must be clearly reserved for bicycle parking only. Outdoor bicycle parking facilities shall be surfaced with a hard surfaced material, i.e., pavers, asphalt, concrete or similar material. This surface must be designed to remain well drained. There are no changes proposed to the parking area and no bicycle parking is required for the proposed use. Therefore, this standard has been met. Minimum Bicycle Parking Requirements: The total number of required bicycle parking spaces for each use is specified in Table 18.765.2 in Section 18.765.070.H. In no case shall there be less than two bicycle parking spaces. As discussed above, according to Table 18.765.2 of the Tigard Development Code, the minimum bicycle-parking requirement for a Wireless Communication Facility is zero spaces. Minimum Off-Street Parking: Section 18.765.070.H states that the minimum and maximum parking shall be as required in Table 18.765.2. Table 18.765.2 states that the minimum parking for a Wireless Communication Facility is zero spaces. Therefore, this standard is satisfied. Off-Street Loading Spaces: Commercial, industrial and institutional buildings or structures to be built or altered which receive and distribute material or merchandise by truck shall provide and maintain off-street loading and maneuvering space as follows: A minimum of one loading space is required for buildings with 10,000 gross square feet or more; A minimum of two loading spaces for buildings with 40,000 gross square feet or more. The proposed wireless communication facility will occupy two existing storage units, no new additional building square footage is being added, therefore this standard does not apply to the applicant's proposal. FINDING: Based on the above analysis, the off-street parking and loading standards have been met. Signs (18.780): Chapter 18.780.130.D lists the type of allowable signs and sign area permitted in the I-P Zoning District. The proposed plans do not call for any signage. Based on this, this standard is met. FINDING: This standard is met, since the applicant has not proposed any signs. NOTICE OF TYPE II DECISION SDR2002-00007/CINGULAR COMMUNICATIONS MONOPOLE PAGE 13 OF 22 Tree Removal (18.790): Section 18.790.030 requires that a tree plan for the planting, removal and protection of trees prepared by a certified arborist shall be rovided with a site development review application. The tree plan shall include identification of all existing trees, identification of a program to save existing trees or mitigate tree removal over 12 inches in caliper, which trees are to be removed, protection program defining standards and methods that will be used by the applicant to protect trees during and after construction. There are a number of trees along the site's north property line that serve as buffering and screening for the mini storage use. The applicant's initial plans showed undergrounding the power and telephone utilities from SW Pacific Highway to the wireless communications facility directly adjacent to the buffer trees. The applicant included a certified arborist assessment and tree protection plan that recommends that the excavation occur no closer than 8 feet from the base of the trees. By following the arborist's recommendation, this standard will be met. FINDING: By following the recommendations of the arborist's tree protection plan, the trees on site should not be impacted. CONDITION: The applicant/owner shall follow the recommendations of the arborist report and maintain a minimum 8-foot separation between the trees and the excavation. Visual Clearance Areas (18.795): Chapter 18.795 requires that a clear vision area shall be maintained on the corners of all property adjacent to intersecting right-of-ways or the intersection of a public street and a private driveway. A clear vision area shall-contain no vehicle, hedge pplanting, fence, wall structure, or-temporary or permanent obstruction exceeding three (3) feet in height. The code provides that obstructions that may located in this area shall be visually clear between three (3) and eight (8) feet in height (8) (trees may be placed within this area provided that all branches below eight (8) feet are removed). A visual clearance area is the triangular area formed by measuring a 30-foot distance along the street right- of-way and the driveway, and then connecting these two (2), 30-foot- distance points with a straight line. The primary access to this property is from SW Pacific Highway. The vision clearance areas are shown on the applicant's site plan. Pictures submitted by the applicant confirm that there are no visual obstacles at the site's access entry. FINDING: The Visual Clearance Standards have been met. Wireless Communication Facilities (18.798): Chapter 18.798 allows wireless communication facilities in commercial zones, the I-P zone and public rights of way, subject to a Site Development Review process, provided they satisfy the specific criteria outlined in this chapter and are setback from any offsite residence a distance equal to the height of the tower. Aesthetic: New towers shall maintain a non-reflective gray finish or, if required by the FAA, be painted pursuant to the FAA's requirements; if collocation on an existing is requested, the design of any antenna(s), accessory structures or equipment shall, to the extent possible, use materials, colors and textures that will match the existing tower or non-tower structure to which the equipment of the collocating provider is being attached; if collocation on an existing non-tower structure is requested, the anfenna(s) and supporting electrical and mechanical equipment shall be a neutral color that is the same as the color as the supporting structure so as to make the antenna(s) and related equipment as visually unobtrusive as possible. The proposed facility is not a collocation. The applicant has not indicated what color the tower will be, nor has the applicant provided information from FAA to determine whether additional flight safety marking will be required. NOTICE OF TYPE II DECISION SDR2002-00007/CINGULAR COMMUNICATIONS MONOPOLE PAGE 14 OF 22 Setbacks: Towers designed to collapse within themselves shall be set back in accordance with the setbacks contained in the base zone; towers not designed to collapse within themselves shall be set back from the property line by a distance equal to the height of the tower. The applicant has proposed to locate the 100-foot tower no closer than 133 feet to any property line in compliance with this requirement. Tower spacing: No new tower shall be allowed within 500 feet of an existing tower. The nearest existing tower is approximately 11/4 miles to the east. Tower height: No tower shall exceed 100 feet for a single user or 125 feet for multiple users; The proposed tower is for a single user, and will be 80 feet. The antennae will be mounted at the top of the tower and will extend another 4 feet above the tower. Lighting: No lighting shall be permitted on a tower except as required by the FAA; No lighting has been proposed on the tower. Fencing and security: For security purposes, towers and ancillary facilities shall be enclosed by a minimum six-foot fence; The proposed facility will be enclosed by a six-foot chain link fence, the equipment will be wholly enclosed within the existing storage units. Landscaping and screening: Landscaping shall be placed outside the fence and shall consist of evergreen shrubs which reach six feet in height and 95% opacity within three years of planting; when adjacent to or within residentially-zoned property, free- standing towers and accessory equipment facilities shall be screened by the planting of a minimum of four evergreen trees at least 15 feet in height at the time of planting. The proposed tower is not within a residential zone. The applicant has requested a variance to this landscape standard, as addressed previously in this decision. By approving the variance, this standard is met. Noise: Noise-generating equipment shall be sound-buffered by means of baffling, barriers or other suitable means to reduce the sound level measured at the property line to 50 dBA (day)/40 dBA (night) when adjacent to a noise-sensitive land use and 75 dBA (day)/60 dBA (night) when adjacent to other uses. The mechanical equipment will be housed and completely enclosed within the storage units. The only external sounds anticipated would be from the air conditioning unit. The property is adjacent to multi-family units (noise sensitive uses), and thus a maximum 50 dBA (day)/40 dBA (night). Additional information as to the noise rating for the air conditioning units is needed to confirm whether or not they will comply with the thresholds set. FINDING: Based on the analysis above, staff cannot determine whether the specific requirements for wireless facilities have been satisfied. However, with the imposition of the following conditions, these standards can be met. CONDITIONS: Unless the applicant has been otherwise directed by the FAA, the color of the monopole shall be a non-reflective galvanized gray finish. The applicant shall provide documentation regarding the noise levels in decibel ratings for the proposed air conditioning units that shows the levels to be below 50 dBA (day)/40 dBA(night) measured at the property line. NOTICE OF TYPE II DECISION SDR2002-00007/CINGULAR COMMUNICATIONS MONOPOLE PAGE 15 OF 22 C. SPECIFIC SITE DEVELOPMENT REVIEW APPROVAL STANDARDS Section 18.360.090(A)(2) through 18.360.090(A)(15) provides additional Site Development Review approval standards not necessarily covered by the provisions of the previously listed sections. These additional standards are addressed immediately below with the following exceptions: The proposal contains no elements related to the provisions of the following and are, therefore, found to be inapplicable as approval standards: 18.360.090.3 (Exterior Elevations); 18.360.090.5 (Privacy and Noise: Multi-family or Group Living Uses); 18.360.090.6 (Private Outdoor Areas: Multi-family Use); 18.360.090.7 (Shared Outdoor Recreation Areas: Multi-family Use); 18.360.090.8 (100-year floodplain); and 18.360.090.9 (Demarcation of Spaces). The following sections were discussed previously in this decision and, therefore, will not be addressed in this section: 18.360.090.4 (Buffering, Screening and Compatibility Between Adjoining Uses); 18.360.090.13 Parking); 18.360.090.14 (Landscaping); 18.360.090.15 (Drainage); and 18.360.090.14 (Provisions for the Disabled). Relationship to the Natural and Physical Environment: Buildings shall be: located to preserve existing trees, topography and natural drainage where possible based upon existing site conditions; located in areas not subject to ground slumping or sliding; located to provide adequate distance between adjoining buildings for adequate light, air circulation, and fire-fighting; and oriented with consideration for sun and wind. Trees shall be preserved to the extent possible. Replacement of trees is subject to the requirements of Chapter 18.790, Tree Removal. The proposed wireless communication facility site is located on existing asphalt, in a flat area of the property. No tree removal, land grading, or drainage alteration is required to accommodate the proposed development. Suitable separation is provided between the proposed equipment shelter and any other buildings on or off site, which is adequate for light and air circulation. Crime Prevention and Safety: • Windows shall be located so that areas vulnerable to crime can be surveyed by the occupants; • Interior laundry and service areas shall be located in a way that they can be observed by others; • Mail boxes shall be located in lighted areas having vehicular or pedestrian traffic; • The exterior lighting levels shall be selected and the angles shall be oriented towards areas vulnerable to crime; and • Light fixtures shall be provided in areas having heavy pedestrian or vehicular traffic and in potentially dangerous areas such as parking lots, stairs, ramps and abrupt grade changes. Fixtures shall be placed at a height so that light patterns overlap at a height of seven feet, which is sufficient to illuminate a person. The un-staffed status of the site necessitates added security. Chain link fencing is proposed to surround the monopole. Radio cabinets will be placed inside the mini storage units. There is existing security lighting for the mini storage complex. Therefore, this criterion has been met. Public Transit: Provisions within the plan shall be included to provide for transit if the development proposal is adjacent to existing or proposed transit route; the requirements for transit facilities shall be based on: the location of other transit facilities in the area; and the size and type of the proposal. The following facilities may be required after City and Tri-Met review: bus stop shelters; turnouts for buses; and connecting paths to the shelters. NOTICE OF TYPE II DECISION SDR2002-00007/CINGULAR COMMUNICATIONS MONOPOLE PAGE 16 OF 22 The site has frontage on SW Pacific Highway. While SW Pacific Highway has a bus route, the proposed development is un-staffed and, therefore, does not generate potential ridership. Therefore, this standard does not apply. Provisions of the Underlying Zone: All of the provisions and regulations of the underlying zone shall apply unless modified by other sections or this title, e.g., Planned Developments, Chapter 18.350; or a variance or adjustment granted under Chapter 18.370. Dimensional Requirements: Provisions of the (C-G) General Commercial Zoning District have been addressed earlier in this decision under Section 18.520.040.B. FINDING: Based on the analysis above, the specific standards of the Site Development Review Section have been met. D. Street And Utility Improvements Standards (Section 18.810): Chapter 18.810 provides construction standards for the implementation of public and private facilities and utilities such as streets, sewers, and drainage. The applicable standards are addressed below: Streets: Improvements: Section 18.810.030.A.1 states that streets within a development and streets adjacent shall be improved in accordance with the TDC standards. Section 18.810.030.A.2 states that any new street or additional street width planned as a portion of an existing street shall be dedicated and improved in accordance with the TDC. This site lies adjacent to SW Pacific Highway, which is classified as a Principal Arterial in the City of Tigard Transportation System Plan. At present, there is approximately 175 feet of total ROW, according to the most recent tax assessor's map. This right-of-way is adequate to meet the TSP planned right-of-way width. Sidewalks: Section 18.810.070.A requires that sidewalks be constructed to meet City design standards and be located on both sides of arterial, collector and local residential streets. There are existing sidewalks along the site's frontage. Sanitary Sewers: Sewers Required: Section 18.810.090.A requires that sanitary sewer be installed to serve each new development and to connect developments to existing mains in accordance with the provisions set forth in Design and Construction Standards for Sanitary and Surface Water Management (as adopted by Clean Water Services in 1996 and including any future revisions or amendments) and the adopted policies of the comprehensive plan. Over-sizing: Section 18.810.090.0 states that proposed sewer systems shall include consideration of additional development within the area as projected by the Comprehensive Plan. There is an existing 8-inch public sewer main located in SW Pacific Highway. The existing structure is already served by this main line. The proposed use does not require sewer service, so no additional public sewer line work is necessary for this development. NOTICE OF TYPE II DECISION SDR2002-00007/CINGULAR COMMUNICATIONS MONOPOLE PAGE 17 OF 22 Storm Drainage: General Provisions: Section 18.810.100.A states requires developers to make adequate provisions for storm water and flood water runoff. Accommodation of Upstream Drainage: Section 18.810.100.0 states that a culvert or other drainage facility shall be large enough to accommodate potential runoff from its entire upstream drainage area, whether inside or outside the development. The City Engineer shall approve the necessary size of the facility, based on the provisions of Design and Construction Standards for Sanitary and Surface Water Management (as adopted by Clean Water Services in 2000 and including any future revisions or amendments). The topography of this is very flat and is served by an internal system of surface drains. These drains discharge into the storm system in SW Pacific Highway. The applicant's onsite storm drainage plan will collect any surface water that would impact this site and convey it to the public system in SW Pacific Highway. Effect on Downstream Drainage: Section 18.810.100.D states that where it is anticipated by the City Engineer that the additional runoff resulting from the development will overload an existing drainage facility, the Director and Engineer shall withhold approval of the development until provisions have been made for improvement of the potential condition or until provisions have been made for storage of additional runoff caused by the development in accordance with the Design and Construction Standards for Sanitary and Surface Water Management (as adopted by Clean Water Services in 2000 and including any future revisions or amendments). CWS design standards provide that if the impervious area of a site is not increased over 5,000 square feet, then onsite detention is not required. There is no net increase in impervious area resulting from this proposal. Therefore, on-site detention is not required for this project. Bikeways and Pedestrian Pathways: Bikeway Extension: Section 18.810.110.A states that developments adjoining proposed bikeways identified on the City's adopted pedestrian/bikeway plan shall include provisions for the future extension of such bikeways through the dedication of easements or right-of-way. No bikeways are associated with this project. Therefore, this criterion does not apply. Cost of Construction: Section 18.810.110.B states that development permits issued for planned unit developments, conditional use permits, subdivisions, and other developments which will principally benefit from such bikeways shall be conditioned to include the cost or construction of bikeway improvements. No bikeways are associated with this project. Therefore, this criterion does not apply. Minimum Width: Section 18.810.110.0 states that the minimum width for bikeways within the roadway is five feet per bicycle travel lane. Minimum width for two-way bikeways separated from the road is eight feet. No bikeways are associated with this project. Therefore, this criterion does not apply. Utilities: Section 18.810.120 states that all utility lines, but not limited to those required for electric, communication, lighting and cable television services and related facilities shall be placed underground, except for surface mounted transformers, surface mounted connection boxes and meter cabinets which may be placed above ground, temporary utility service facilities during construction, high capacity electric lines operating at 50,000 volts or above, and: NOTICE OF TYPE II DECISION SDR2002-00007/CINGULAR COMMUNICATIONS MONOPOLE PAGE 18 OF 22 • The developer shall make all necessary arrangements with the serving utility to provide the underground services; • The City reserves the right to approve location of all surface mounted facilities; • All underground utilities, including sanitary sewers and storm drains installed in streets by the developer, shall be constructed prior to the surfacing of the streets; and • Stubs for service connections shall be long enough to avoid disturbing the street improvements when service connections are made. Exception to Under-Grounding Requirement: Section 18.810.120.0 states that a developer shall pay a fee in-lieu of under-grounding costs when the development is proposed to take place on a street where existing utilities which are not underground will serve the development and the approval authority determines that the cost and technical difficulty of under-grounding the utilities outweighs the benefit of under- grounding in conjunction with the development. The determination shall be on a case- by-case basis. The most common, but not the only, such situation is a short frontage development for which under-grounding would result in the placement of additional poles, rather than the removal of above-ground utilities facilities. An applicant for a development which is served by utilities which are not underground and which are located across a public right-of-way from the applicant's property shall pay a fee in-lieu of under-grounding. There are existing overhead utility lines along both sides of SW Pacific Highway. According to the Engineering Department, the lines that front this site are high power lines, and are therefore exempt from this undergrounding requirement. All service utilities to the development shall be installed underground however. ADDITIONAL CITY AND/OR AGENCY CONCERNS WITH STREET AND UTILITY IMPROVEMENT STANDARDS: Public Water System: This site is located in the Tualatin Valley Water District (TVWD) service area. Storm Water Quality: The City has agreed to enforce Surface Water Management (SWM) regulations established by Clean Water Services (CWS) Design and Construction Standards (adopted by Resolution and Order No. 00-7) which require the construction of on-site water quality facilities. The facilities shall be designed to remove 65 percent of the phosphorus contained in 100 percent of the storm water runoff generated from newly created impervious surfaces. In addition, a maintenance plan shall be submitted indicating the frequency and method to be used in keeping the facility maintained through the year. As no new impervious areas are being created, no additional compliance measures are required. Grading and Erosion Control: CWS Design and Construction Standards also regulate erosion control to reduce the amount of sediment and other pollutants reaching the public storm and surface water system resulting from development, construction, grading, excavating, clearing, and any other activity which accelerates erosion. Per CWS regulations, the applicant is required to submit an erosion control plan for City review and approval prior to issuance of City permits. The Federal Clean Water Act requires that a National Pollutant Discharge Elimination System (NPDES) erosion control permit be issued for any development that will disturb five or more acres of land. While the subject property is greater than 5 acres, the area of disturbance is limited to approximately 1200 square feet. Since this disturbed area is less than five acres, the developer will not be required to obtain an NPDES permit from the City prior to construction. This permit will be issued along with the site and/or building permit. NOTICE OF TYPE II DECISION SDR2002-00007/CINGULAR COMMUNICATIONS MONOPOLE PAGE 19 OF 22 A grading and erosion control plan must be submitted to the Building Division during the site permit review phase. The Building Division will review the onsite grading plan during the site permit review. A NPDES permit is not required, as the disturbance area is less than five acres in size. FINDING: Based on the above analysis, the Agency Concerns have been addressed by the application materials. Address Assignments: The City of Tigard is responsible for assigning addresses for parcels within the City of Tigard and within the Urban Service Boundary (USB). An addressing fee in the amount of $30.00 per address shall be assessed. This fee shall be paid to the City prior to issuance of a site permit. For this project, there is no additional addressing fee, as the existing address will be maintained. E. IMPACT STUDY (18.390) Section 18.360.090 states, "The Director shall make a finding with respect to each of the following criteria when approving, approving with conditions or denying an application:' Section 18.390.040 states that the applicant shall provide an impact study to quantify the effect of development on public facilities and services. For each public facility system and type of impact, the study shall propose improvements necessary to meet City standard, and to minimize the impact of the development on the public at large, public facilities systems, and affected private property users. In situations where the Community Development Code requires the dedication of real property interests, the applicant shall either specifically concur with a requirement for public right-of-way dedication, or provide evidence that supports that the real property dedication is not roughly proportional to the projected impacts of the development. Section 18.390.040 states that when a condition of approval requires the transfer to the public of an interest in real property, the approval authority shall adopt findings which support the conclusion that the interest in real property to be transferred is roughly proportional to the impact the proposed development will have on the public. The applicant has provided an impact study addressing the project's impacts on public systems. The study notes that there will be no impact to the transportation system as the facility will only generate one round trip per month. Bikeways will likewise not be affected, and there are no bikeways in the immediate area. The drainage system will not be adversely impacted either. As the area to be developed is presently covered with pavement, there will be no increase to the amount of stormwater runoff that is currently being contributed to the system. Parks, water and sewer systems will not be impacted as the proposed monopole is un-staffed and does not require sewer or water hookups.s. Earlier in this report, the issue about noise from the air conditioning units was raised, and condition imposed that the applicant provides documentation regarding compliance with the noise limits. There is no TIF assessment for this use as it generates a limited amount of traffic. FINDING: The proposed development either has no impact or will mitigate the effect of the impact for the above noted public systems through the imposition of conditions. NOTICE OF TYPE II DECISION SDR2002-00007/CINGULAR COMMUNICATIONS MONOPOLE PAGE 20 OF 22 SECTION VII. OTHER STAFF COMMENTS The City of Tigard Forester has reviewed the proposal and noted that no trees will be impacted by the proposed improvements, and therefore has no comments. The City of Tigard Public Works Department and the City of Tigard Crime Prevention Office of the Police Department has reviewed the proposal and have no objections to it. SECTION VIII. AGENCY COMMENTS Washington County Communications (WCCCA) has reviewed the proposal and has no objections to it. Tualatin Valley Fire and Rescue has reviewed the applicant's submittal and provided the following comments: In order to ensure the adequate protection of the public health, safety, and welfare of the citizens of the City of Tigard, no permitted wireless communications facility operator shall operate the permitted facility in any way that impedes, impairs, or negatively impacts the communication abilities of any public safety or emergency response organization serving the public within the City of Tigard's jurisdictional limits. Additionally, it is noted that federal regulations give priority to communications involving safety of life or property, as follows: 47 CFR 90.403 (d) provides in relevant part, that communications involving the imminent life of fe or property, are to be afforded priority by all licensees. If interference complaints are filed against the cell tower operator, which allege radio frequency interference, the cell tower operator shall provide documentary evidence from the FCC that the cell tower operator has complied with all federal laws and regulations regarding the handling and resolution of such complaints, and confirming that the communications involving the public safety provider have been given priority by the cell tower operator. SECTION IX. PROCEDURE AND APPEAL INFORMATION Notice: Notice was posted at City Hall and mailed to: X The applicant and owners X Owner of record within the required distance X Affected government agencies Final Decision: THIS DECISION IS FINAL ON JUNE 27, 2002 AND BECOMES EFFECTIVE ON JULY 13, 2002 UNLESS AN APPEAL IS FILED. Appeal: The decision of the Director (Type II Procedure) or Review Authority (Type II Administrative Appeal or Type III Procedure) is final for purposes of appeal on the date that it is mailed. Any party with standing as provided in Section 18.390.040.G.1. may appeal this decision in accordance with Section 18.390.040.G.2. of the Tigard Community Development Code which provides that a written appeal together with the required fee shall be filed with the Director within ten (10) business days of the date the notice of the decision was mailed. The appeal fee schedule and forms are available from the Planning Division of Tigard City Hall, 13125 SW Hall Boulevard, Tigard, Oregon 97223. NOTICE OF TYPE II DECISION SDR2002-00007/CINGULAR COMMUNICATIONS MONOPOLE PAGE 21 OF 22 Unless the applicant is the appellant, the hearing on an appeal from the Director's Decision shall be confined to the specific issues identified in the written comments submitted by the parties during the comment period. Additional evidence concerning issues properly raised in the Notice of Appeal may be submitted by any party during the appeal hearing, subject to any additional rules of procedure that may be adopted from time to time by the appellate body. THE DEADLINE FOR FILING AN APPEAL IS AT 5:00 PM ON JULY 12, 2002. Questions: If you have any questions, please call the City of Tigard Planning Division, Tigard City Hall, 13125 SW Hall Boulevard, Tigard, Oregon at (503) 639-4171. June 27, 2002 PREPARE rr BY: orgari'Tracy DATE Associate Planner -------(------ _.ei----i _. ,..) ... / c......7_ __ • ,.. .�� .... ''� ./ June 27, 2002 APPROVED BY: Richard H. Bew,ers 'orff DATE Planning Manager i:\curpin\morgan\workspace\sdr\sdr2002-00007(cingular)\sdr2002-00007 draft decision.doc NOTICE OF TYPE II DECISION SDR2002-00007/CINGULAR COMMUNICATIONS MONOPOLE PAGE 22 OF 22 / // / MST.SS MGR I j�, (, / 3301•-0' ri` "(i` •T" COW.TREES % j t /'V PP. � • � i CAST.F.N. - I 1 1 1. t i t I 4 I ,i11 4 I 'I I' A I. 1 I`- I I♦ h, I i I EAST..•NDN^A /,•M _ M. C illIllie=:MIIIIIIII '* LOT • NSKr200 Er / { Airk Y ACCESS MUD ONE STORY STORAGE BURL.-A' EASIWO ONE STORY Sl0(ACE BURP.•F'' r aA�( jt r r r _ .r r O'lCi9 C CI 4C3 ClOJG)'771 J.." (. '3C)�'3'l3��f!<7)J� Gi��.A.10 rlrii • , '.• , EAST.WEINEROAL BDRLNO EASING 12•-O' iii 1 ' EAST-1S'NON Cpl,. r j NNN MSORNTAE i%'%ir/'ii ri irt: (p' ,ri g _ CITY of TIGARD Pill O� ., "f; `�� , GEOGRAPHIC INiORMATiON SYSTEM voir•-■ I �2 ,: - m VICINITY MAP e ID �_ ; o 11111 -** ir, •„,:, .,,,,■-■-• SDR2002-00001 VAR2002-00017 ED 4,11111 +��:.:�� 8 H i CINGULAR WIRELESS ♦ S t p�� E`" a � %;;; w N @ 1 . . Emir IT B Salmon PCS, Inc. 123 NE 3rd Avenue, Suite 240 SDR2002-00007NAR2002-00017 Portland, OR 97232 CINGULAR WIRELESS MONOPOLE TOWER SSC Property Holdings, Inc. 1155 Batley Street, #440 Seattle, WA 98109 Mericom Corporation Attn: Ed Fournier 25977 SW Canyon Creek Road, Suite E Wilsonville, OR 97070 Sally Jones 15745 SW Oakhill Lane Tigard, OR 97224 AFFIDAVIT OF MAILING 411 CITY OF TIGARD Community cDevefopment Shaping Better Community I, cPatricia L. Lunsford being first duly sworn/affirm, on oath depose and say that I am a Senior Administrative Specialist for the City ofTigar,, Washington County, Oregon and that I served the following: {Check Appopnate Box(s)Bebw) © NOTICE OF PENDING LAND USE APPLICATION FOR: SDR2002-00007/VAR2002-00011 - CINGULAR WIRELESS MONOPOLE TOWER AMENDED NOTICE (File No./Name Reference) II� ® City of Tigard Planning Director A copy of the said notice being hereto attached, marked Exhibit"A",and by reference made a part hereof, was mailed to each named person(s) at the address(s) shown on the attached list(s), marked Exhibit"B", and by reference made a part hereof, on May 21,2002, and deposited in the United States Mail on May 21,2002,postage prepaid. ‘, ' 1.1e-e6L( A i rifi-- _/ ' (Person th Prepared Noti•z) STATE of , Go w ) County of ff W ington )ss. City of-Tigard ) S (- Subscribed and sworn/affirmed before me on the day of , 2002. i‘' . i /1 ,N OFFICIAL SEAL NOTARY U�OF RE i • � ., DIANE M JEI.DERKS ` ;- NOTARY PUBLIC-OREGON My Commission Expi 74/03 MY COMMISSION EXPIRES SEPT.07,2003 . EXI IFIT A NOTICE TO MORTGAGEE, LIENHOLDER,VENDOR OR SELLER: THE TIGARD DEVELOPMENT CODE REQUIRES THAT IF YOU RECEIVE THIS NOTICE,IT SHALL BE PROMPTLY FORWARDED TO THE PURCHASER. NOTICE OF PENDING LAND USE APPLICATION SITE DEVELOPMENT REVIEW CITY TY OF TIGARD Community(DeveCopmr n Shaping Better Community DATE OF NOTICE: May 21, 2002 FILE NUMBER: SITE DEVELOPMENT REVIEW (SDR) 2002-00007 Type II Land Use Application ADJUSTMENT (VAR) 2002-00017 Type I Land Use Application FILE NAME: CINGULAR WIRELESS MONOPOLE TOWER PROPOSAL: The applicant is proposing to construct an 80-foot wireless monopole tower. The associated accessory equipment will be placed within an existing storage unit. An adjustment has been requested seeking relief from the requirement that the wireless communication facility enclosure be screened by landscaping. ZONE: C-G: General Commercial District. The C-G zoning district is designed to accommodate a full range of retail, office and civic uses with a City-wide and even regional trade area; except where non-conforming, residential uses are limited to single-family residences which are located on the same site as a permitted use. A wide range of uses, including but not limited to adult entertainment, automotive equipment repair and storage, mini-warehouses, utilities, heliports, medical centers, major event entertainment, and gasoline stations, are permitted conditionally. APPLICABLE REVIEW CRITERIA: Community Development Code Chapters 18.370, 18.390, 18.520, 18.705, 18.730, 18.745, 18.765, 18.795 and 18.798. LOCATION: 15700 SW Pacific Highway; WCTM 2S110DC, Tax Lot 00300. YOUR RIGHT TO PROVIDE WRITTEN COMMENTS: Prior to the City making any decision on the Application, you are hereby provided a fourteen (14) day period to submit written comments on the application to the City. THE FOURTEEN (14) DAY PERIOD ENDS AT 5:00 PM ON JUNE 4, 2002. All comments should be directed to Morgan Tracy, Associate Planner in the Planning Division at the City of Tigard, 13125 SW Hall Boulevard, Tigard, Oregon 97223. You may reach the City of Tigard by telephone at (503) 639-4171. ALL COMMENTS MUST BE RECEIVED BY THE CITY OF TIGARD IN WRITING PRIOR TO 5:00 PM ON THE DATE SPECIFIED ABOVE IN ORDER FOR YOUR COMMENTS TO BE CONSIDERED IN THE DECISION MAKING PROCESS THE CITY OF TIGARD APPRECIATES RECEIVING COMMENTS AND VALUES YOUR INPUT. COMMENTS WILL BE CONSIDERED AND ADDRESSED WITHIN THE NOTICE OF DECISION. A DECISION ON THIS ISSUE IS TENTATIVELY SCHEDULED FOR JULY 3, 2002. IF YOU PROVIDE COMMENTS, YOU WILL BE SENT A COPY OF THE FULL DECISION ONCE IT HAS BEEN RENDERED. WRITTEN COMMENTS WILL BECOME A PART OF THE PERMANENT PUBLIC RECORD AND SHALL CONTAIN THE FOLLOWING INFORMATION: • Address the specific "Applicable Review Criteria" described in the section above or any other criteria believed to be applicable to this proposal; • Raise any issues and/or concerns believed to be important with sufficient evidence to allow the City to provide a response; • Comments that provide the basis for an appeal to the Tigard Hearings Officer must address the relevant approval criteria with sufficient specificity on that issue. Failure of any party to address the relevant approval criteria with sufficient specificity may preclude subsequent appeals to the Land Use Board of Appeals or Circuit Court on that issue. Specific findings directed at the relevant approval criteria are what constitute relevant evidence. AFTER THE 14 DAY COMMENT PERIOD CLOSES, THE DIRECTOR SHALL ISSUE A TYPE II ADMINISTRATIVE DECISION. THE DIRECTOR'S DECISION SHALL BE MAILED TO THE APPLICANT AND TO OWNERS OF RECORD OF PROPERTY LOCATED WITHIN 500 FEET OF THE SUBJECT SITE, AND TO ANYONE ELSE WHO SUBMITTED WRITTEN COMMENTS OR WHO IS OTHERWISE ENTITLED TO NOTICE. THE DIRECTOR'S DECISION SHALL ADDRESS ALL OF THE RELEVANT APPROVAL CRITERIA. BASED UPON THE CRITERIA AND THE FACTS CONTAINED WITHIN THE RECORD, THE DIRECTOR SHALL APPROVE, APPROVE WITH CONDITIONS OR DENY THE REQUESTED PERMIT OR ACTION. SUMMARY OF THE DECISION-MAKING PROCESS: ♦ The application is accepted by the City ♦ Notice is sent to property owners of record within 500 feet of the proposed development area allowing a 14-day written comment period. ♦ The application is reviewed by City Staff and affected agencies. • City Staff issues a written decision. ♦ Notice of the decision is sent to the Applicant and all owners or contract purchasers of record of the site; all owners of record of property located within 500 feet of the site, as shown on the most recent property tax assessment roll; any City-recognized neighborhood group whose boundaries include the site; and any governmental agency which is entitled to notice under an intergovernmental agreement entered into with the City which includes provision for such notice or anyone who is otherwise entitled to such notice. INFORMATION/EVIDENCE AVAILABLE FOR REVIEW: The application, written comments and supporting documents relied upon by the Director to make this decision are contained within the record and are available for public review at the City of Tigard Community Development Department. Copies of these items may be obtained at a cost of $.25 per page or the current rate charged for this service. Questions regarding this application should be directed to the Planning Staff indicated on the first page of this Notice under the section titled Your Right to Provide Written Comments." raw. , m _ CITY olnT..c.nH, o #440 ‘'`.. e If VICINITY MAP g1ii VAR2002 00017 Els j • �h, a Dgio ��M1 f CINGULAR WIRELESS P e,„, ,��,I'� •, s „�' ;;:53 �::•1®®1= min MONOPOLE TOWER ii!t ,t .\ l40 Pte/ !mum . e. 4. 71 D op, .otos ,,,'' •. ''' •,, ., 'c-,_ 1_may// f..4 V 7 k ,,,,, MIIIIIIINNII I E t El 0 200 000 0I0 0001 1111, r City of Tips ' \ ....................w+. 0000 .ww. 1r 1..00.4+0000..o�w.nw.xww. Apra in«nN S DR0001.- 7 • 2S110DC-90072 2S110DC-90472 EXIIIT IT 3 ADAMS BARBARA ARDEN CARSON HAZEL M TR • 15695 SW 114TH CT#7 15522 SW 114TH CT#47 TIGARD,OR 97224 TIGARD,OR 97224 2S 110D C-90161 2S 110DC-90142 ALLEN JOHN D&JACKIE F CHRISTENSON ROBERT FOX 15605 SW 114TH CT#16 CHRISTENSON SUSAN V TIGARD,OR 97224 15655 SW 114TH CT TIGARD,OR 97224 2S 110CA-01701 2S 110DC-90042 ATLANTIC RICHFIELD COMPANY CLUTTS CHARLES L AND PS&T TAX DEPT SS#01175-11 JOAN B PO BOX 2485 15695 SW 114TH CT UNIT 4 LOS ANGELES,CA 90051 TIGARD,OR 97224 2S110DC-90531 2S110DC-00700 BELKNAP VIENNA H CONGREGATE CARE ASSET V LTD PTN 15518 SW 114TH CT#53 BY FALCON FINANCIAL TIGARD,OR 97224 PO BOX 12188 SALEM,OR 97309 2S 110CD-00111 S 110 D C-00600 BOBOSKY JUDEEN CO REGA CARE ASSET V LTD PTN BY FIRST AMERICAN REAL ESTATE TAX S BY FAL.o FINANCIAL COMMERCIAL TAX PO :dX 12 :8 8435 N STEMMONS FREEWAY LEM,OR 9 309 DALLAS,TX 75247 2S 110D C-90191 2S 110DC-90271 BOLLINGER JESSIE LEE DAHL STANLEY F&THELMA J 15605 SE 114TH CT#19 15525 SW 114TH CT#27 TIGARD,OR 97224 TIGARD,OR 97224 2S110DC-90292 2S110DC-90111 BORK BRUCE A&MARGARET A DOMGORGEN IRMGARD& 15525 SW 14TH CT#29 WALTER ROSIE TIGARD,OR 97224 15655 SW 114TH CT#11 TIGARD,OR 97224 2S 110DC-90021 2S 110DC-90182 BOYLES HELEN A TRUSTEE DOMREIS LIONEL A W TRUSTEE 15695 SW 114TH CT#2 15605 SW 114TH CT#18 TIGARD,OR 97224 TIGARD,OR 97224 2S1 10 D C-90262 S 110DC-900 BURNETT RALPH A&NANCY A F T SAT SUMMERFIELD CONDO P 15565 SW 114TH CT#26 OW OF UNITS TIGARD,OR 97224 0 2S1 10 DC-9031 1 1 10 D B-9001. CALLANTINE JEANNE M TR& FOb•T• ■S AT SUMMERFIELD CONDO P CALLANTINE DANIEL W TR OW ' ' ! UNITS 15525 SW 114TH CT#31 , TIGARD,OR 97223 2S 110DC-90482 2S 110CD-07800 FREDRICKS MARY JANE TRUSTEE KAADY CHARLES 15522 SW 114TH CT#48 7400 SW BARBUR BLVD TIGARD,OR 97224 PORTLAND,OR 97219 2S 110D B-90381 S 110CD-07.10 FROST LENA D •■•IY • ARLES 15485 SW 114TH CT UNIT 38 7400 BARBUR BLVD TIGARD,OR 97223 '•RTLA : OR 97219 25 110DC-90461 2S 110DB-90371 HALL JOYCE IRENE TRUST KINCAID JUANITA BY HALL JOYCE I& 9850 SW HAWTHORNE LANE JACOBS THOMAS C TRUSTEES PORTLAND,OR 97225 15522 SW 114TH CT TIGARD,OR 97224 2S 110DC-90231 2S 110DC-02400 HARNS JAMES R&PATRICIA S LAYTON PROPERTIES LLC 14106 PENNYSTONE DR BY NORRIS&STEVENS INC SUN CITY WEST,AZ 85375 520 SW SIXTH AVE STE 400 PORTLAND,OR 97204 2S1 10D C-90541 2S 110DC-02300 HART MARGERY L& LA ON P PERTIES NO 2 LLC HART STEVEN CRAIG TRUSTEES BY NO IS&STEVENS INC 15518 SW 114TH CT 520 6T VE STE 400 TIGARD,OR 97224 P RTLAND,OR 97204 2S1100C-90562 2S110DC-90501 HAYMAN BERNIECE I TRUST LDF TRUST 15518 SW 114TH CT#56 BY LONNIE D FOSTER TR TIGARD,OR 97224 6168 ROSEMEADOW LN NE SALEM,OR 97301 2S 110DC-90252 2S 110DC-90102 HOWARD CLARA M LEVIN ESTHER H 15565 SW 114TH CT#25 15655 SW 114TH#10 TIGARD,OR 97224 TIGARD,OR 97224 2S 110DC-90552 2S 110DC-90032 HOWARD JEWEL M LUKE BERNICE& 15518 SW 114TH CT#55 ALLEN JACKIE F TIGARD,OR 97224 15695 SW 114TH CT UNIT 3 TIGARD,OR 97224 2S 110DC-90011 2S 110DC-00500 HOWELLS JOHN&ELIZABETH ANN LUTON ROBERT C 2027 N FOREST CT do KVERNLAND ERIC B CANBY,OR 97013 11445 SW SUMMERFIELD DR TIGARD,OR 97224 2S1 10D C-90491 2S 110DC-90212 HUGHES STANLEY F TRUSTEE MACKEY ROBERT A/MARCIA J TRS 15522 SW 114TH CT 15605 SW 114TH CT#21 TIGARD,OR 97224 TIGARD,OR 97224 2S1 10 DC-90091 2S1 10D C-90222 MARSHALL MARY RUTH& MILLER PATTY G GEORGE L JR 15605 SW 114TH CT#22 2560 AGATE ST TIGARD,OR 97224 EUGENE,OR 97403 2S 110DC-90512 2S 110DC-90151 MATTILA ERNEST L NEILS ELDOR S 15522 SW 114TH CT#51 NEILS CAROLYN H TIGARD,OR 97224 10330 W THUNDERBIRD BLVD APT C210 SUN CITY,AZ 85351 2S 110DC-90051 2S 110DC-02100 MAY JOHN&JACQUELINE PORTLAND METRO PARTNERS 15695 SW 114TH CT UNIT 5 BY STERLING DEVELOPMENT CORP TIGARD,OR 97224 LA JOLLA CORPORATE CENTER 3252 HOLIDAY CT STE 225 LA JOLLA,CA 92037 2S 110CD-00106 2S 110DC-90332 MCCANN CAREL V JR RAMSTHEL MABEL J 15685 SW 116TH 15525 SW 114TH CT#33 KING CITY,OR 97224 TIGARD,OR 97223 2S 110DC-90201 2S 110DC-90522 MCDANIEL JUANITA M& RECKERS CHARLES W AND REX A MARGARET J TRUSTEES 15605 SW 114TH CT 15522 SW 114TH CT#52 TIGARD,OR 97224 TIGARD,OR 97224 2S1 10 DC-90342 2S 110DC-90321 MCDONALD RUTH S TRUSTEE REHDER JEANNE N 15525 SW 114TH CT#34 15525 SW 114TH CT TIGARD,OR 97224 TIGARD,OR 97224 2S1 10 DC-90121 2S1 10 DC-90281 MCLELLAN BEATRICE C ROBBERSON DOUGLAS L& 15655 SW 114TH COURT#12 SUSAN K TIGARD,OR 97224 15525 SW 114TH CT TIGARD,OR 97224 2S 110DB-90362 2S110DC-90602 MCMULLEN RICHARD D AND ROGERS THOMAS T/LA VERNE GERTRUDE M TRUSTEES 15518 SW 114TH CT#60 15485 SW 114TH CT#36 TIGARD,OR 97224 TIGARD,OR 97224 2S1 10 DB-90442 2 S 110DC-90592 MESSINGER EDWARD J AND ANN B ROTH ROBERT E&MAE L 15483 SW 114TH CT#44 15518 SW 114TH CT#59 TIGARD,OR 97224 TIGARD,OR 97224 2S 110DC-90451 2S 110DC-90172 METZGER ELNA L TRUSTEE RUDE SHIRLEY M& 15522 SW 114TH CT#45 CASWELL JEANNE M/MERRILL ERIC M& TIGARD,OR 97224 CASWELL TIMOTHY A/CASWELL PAULA 15605 SW 114TH CT#17 TIGARD,OR 97224 • 28 110DC-90571 281 ioDC-90061 RYAN THOMAS E&JOAN M TRUSTEES THOMAS CLEMENTINE C CO-TR& 15518 SW 114TH CT#57 THOMAS HOLLIS E CO-TR& TIGARD,OR 97224 THOMAS CYNTHIA J CO-TR 15695 SW 114TH CT#6 TIGARD,OR 97224 2S1 10D B-90392 2S 110DC-02200 SCHENK SOPHIA M TIGARD CENTER LP 15485 SW 114TH CT#39 BY BARCLAY'S REALTY&MNGT CO TIGARD,OR 97224 9777 WILSHIRE BLVD STE 1009 BEVERLY HILLS,CA 90212 2S1 10D B-90351 2S 110DB-90402 SCHROEDER MARJORY E TRUSTEE TILLINGHAST RUTH P TRUSTEE 15485 SW 114TH CT#35 15485 SW 114TH#40 TIGARD,OR 97224 TIGARD,OR 97224 2S 110DC-00300 2S 110CD-07600 SSC PROPERTY HOLDINGS INC TOBIAS INVESTMENT CO BY PTA LLC-SHUR#38004 300 SE SPOKANE ST PO BOX 19156 PORTLAND,OR 97202 ALEXANDRIA,VA 22320 2S110DC-90132 110CD-07510 STAYTON BARBARA JANE TO: :S (VESTMENT CO 15655 SW 114TH CT#13 300 : •SKANE ST TIGARD,OR 97224 PORTLAND,OR 97202 2S1 10D B-90432 2S 110CD-00105 STURGESS MARGARET I UNITED STATES NATIONAL BANK 15483 SW 114TH CT#43 BY US BANK PROPERTIES TIGARD,OR 97224 2800 EAST LAKE ST MINNEAPOLIS,MN 55406 2S 110DC-01000 2S 110DC-90241 SUMMERFIELD ASSOCIATES LLC VETTERLEIN CATHRYN J TRUST BY HSC REAL ESTATE 15565 SW 114TH CT#24 1500 SW FIRST AVE STE 1020 TIGARD,OR 97223 PORTLAND,OR 97201 110DD-00109 2S 110DC-90302 SU ERFI• D ASSOCIATES LLC ZIEGELMAYER FRANCES M TRUSTEE BY HST EAL ESTATE 15525 SW 114TH CT#30 150! W F T AVE STE 1020 TIGARD,OR 97224 ••RTLAND,OR 97201 2S 110DC-90082 TENNENT MELVIN G/JANE B 15695 SW 114TH CT#8 TIGARD,OR 97224 2S1 10D C-90581 TENTO ELEANOR E 15518 SW 114TH CT#58 TIGARD,OR 97224 Jack Biethan 11023 SW Summerfield Drive, #4 Tigard, OR 97224 Kristen Miller 8940 SW Edgewood Street Tigard, OR 97223 Paul Owen 10335 SW Highland Drive Tigard, OR 97224 Louise Fronville 15760 SW Oak Meadow Lane Tigard, OR 97224 Tim Esav PO Box 230695 Tigard, OR 97281 Nathan and Ann Murdock PO Box 231265 Tigard, OR 97281 Ross Sundberg 16382 SW 104th Avenue Tigard, OR 97224 CITY OF TIGARD - SOUTH CIT SUBCOMMITTEE (pg. I of I) (i:\curpin\setup\labels\CIT South.doc) UPDATED: January 11, 2002 Salmon P S, Inc. 123 NE 3r Avenue, Suite 240 SDR2002-00007/VAR2002-00017 Portland, OR 97232 CINGULAR WIRELESS MONOPOLE TOWER SSC Property Holdings, Inc. 1155 Ballet' Street, #440 Seattle, WA 98109 Mericom Corporation Attn: Ed Fournier 25977 SW Canyon Creek Road, Suite E Wilsonville, OR 97070 � �� ,� r+ems y CITY ofTIGARD M GEOGRAPHIC INf ORM�TION SYSTEM St. _ AREA NOTIFIED ./ , �� (500') 1011111 Q a'aQ sT FOR: Ed Fournier ,, ' „- �E o o RE: 251 IODC, 300 Frill s o o (I 5700 SW Pacific) w _ o ♦♦ �' ■` ♦ ', �clsrn l ,. ' tf aief n �. NaE r ' �� Property owner information ++wrip5- ti ■ emenes " �" 2` .� 14.1. ,�11 ow'ROOK, the d to printed on this map. . 41 10* 11011' 1111011161111 \\\\.\\\\.\\\.,\:‘!,„., \,N,\\\\;\\\.•\WN,N".1 ,,,„,,,* ,,,i \\*),,,,,,,,,,„,,,,.„..,,,,,,„„:„,,,,„ ni.,,,„„ \r___________ sl", Air tie .,\- 4: _-.::zk,„N,,;,:,,,:, ,,,:,;‘ ,A, °4;4* nxiici= ..* ;■\\*\_\\\N'4,..,.\.:'S.:4,.\\\,_s.,`,,'S'z::!:?,, ,c%S:■,„_Nls.1/4. \\-\''4,\ ,,S,4\ks.,„ I 1 I:7 7- -0 . P 1 .� 744 lsrMamas .g>, N e 0 so `% 41'R ® �• 4% 0 0 too 200 305 400 Feet S� ai* =326 feel Y,q�, trl �rep all ED BE3 • nt ;11E-.a .ma. City of Tigard Information on this map is for general location only and should be vented with the Development Services Division. 13125 SW Hat Blvd Tigard,OR 97223 (503)639-0171 htt I Z /� —� p:!(M,ww.ci.tigard.onus Community Development Plot date:Apr 1,2002;C:\magic\MAGIC03.APR 2S1 10 DC-90072 2S1 10 DC-90472 ADAMS BARBARA ARDEN CARSON HAZEL M TR 15695 SW 114TH CT#7 15522 SW 114TH CT#47 TIGARD, OR 97224 TIGARD,OR 97224 2S1100C-90161 2S110DC-90142 ALLEN JOHN D&JACKIE F CHRISTENSON ROBERT FOX 15605 SW 114TH CT#16 CHRISTENSON SUSAN V TIGARD,OR 97224 15655 SW 114TH CT TIGARD,OR 97224 2S 110CA-01701 2S 110DC-90042 ATLANTIC RICHFIELD COMPANY CLUTTS CHARLES L AND PS&T TAX DEPT SS#01175-11 JOAN B PO BOX 2485 15695 SW 114TH CT UNIT 4 LOS ANGELES,CA 90051 TIGARD,OR 97224 2S 110DC-90531 2S 110DC-00700 BELKNAP VIENNA H CONGREGATE CARE ASSET V LTD PTN 15518 SW 114TH CT#53 BY FALCON FINANCIAL TIGARD,OR 97224 PO BOX 12188 SALEM,OR 97309 2S11000-O011 1 S 110DC-00600 BOBOSKY JUDEEN CO REGA CARE ASSET V LTD PTN BY FIRST AMERICAN REAL ESTATE TAX S BY FAL.: FINANCIAL COMMERCIAL TAX PO a dX 12 '8 8435 N STEMMONS FREEWAY •LEM,OR 9 309 DALLAS,TX 75247 2S110DC-90191 2S 110DC-90271 BOLLINGER JESSIE LEE DAHL STANLEY F&THELMA J 15605 SE 114TH CT#19 15525 SW 114TH CT#27 TIGARD,OR 97224 TIGARD,OR 97224 2S 110DC-90292 2S 110DC-90111 BORK BRUCE A&MARGARET A DOMGORGEN IRMGARD& 15525 SW 14TH CT#29 WALTER ROSIE TIGARD,OR 97224 15655 SW 114TH CT#11 TIGARD,OR 97224 2S1 100 C-90021 2S 110DC-90182 BOYLES HELEN A TRUSTEE DOMREIS LIONEL A W TRUSTEE 15695 SW 114TH CT#2 15605 SW 114TH CT#18 TIGARD, OR 97224 TIGARD,OR 97224 2S1 100 C-90262 S11000-900 BURNETT RALPH A&NANCY A F T S AT SUMMERFIELD CONDO P 15565 SW 114TH CT#26 OW OF UNITS TIGARD,OR 97224 0 2S1 10DC-9031 1 1100E1-9001, CALLANTINE JEANNE M TR& FOb T• ■S AT SUMMERFIELD CONDO P CALLANTINE DANIEL W TR OW ' ' ! UNITS 15525 SW 114TH CT#31 , TIGARD,OR 97223 2S1 10D C-90482 2S 110CD-07800 FREDRICKS MARY JANE TRUSTEE KAADY CHARLES 15522 SW 114TH CT#48 7400 SW BARBUR BLVD TIGARD,OR 97224 PORTLAND,OR 97219 2S1 10 D B-90381 S 110CD-07 010 FROST LENA D K,∎'BY ' ARLES 15485 SW 114TH CT UNIT 38 740! BARBUR BLVD TIGARD, OR 97223 '•RTLA : OR 97219 2S1 10 D C-90461 2S1 10D B-90371 HALL JOYCE IRENE TRUST KINCAID JUANITA BY HALL JOYCE I & 9850 SW HAWTHORNE LANE JACOBS THOMAS C TRUSTEES PORTLAND,OR 97225 15522 SW 114TH CT TIGARD,OR 97224 2S 110DC-90231 2S1 10DC-02400 HARNS JAMES R&PATRICIA S LAYTON PROPERTIES LLC 14106 PENNYSTONE DR BY NORRIS&STEVENS INC SUN CITY WEST,AZ 85375 520 SW SIXTH AVE STE 400 PORTLAND,OR 97204 2S1 10 D C-90541 2S 110DC-02300 HART MARGERY L& LA ON P'•PERTIES NO 2 LLC HART STEVEN CRAIG TRUSTEES BY NO' IS&STEVENS INC 15518 SW 114TH CT 520 : 6T' 'VE STE 400 TIGARD,OR 97224 PORTLAND,OR 97204 2S 110 DC-90562 2S 110DC-90501 HAYMAN BERNIECE I TRUST LDF TRUST 15518 SW 114TH CT#56 BY LONNIE D FOSTER TR TIGARD,OR 97224 6168 ROSEMEADOW LN NE SALEM,OR 97301 2S 110DC-90252 2S 110DC-90102 HOWARD CLARA M LEVIN ESTHER H 15565 SW 114TH CT#25 15655 SW 114TH#10 TIGARD,OR 97224 TIGARD,OR 97224 2S 110DC-90552 2S 110DC-90032 HOWARD JEWEL M LUKE BERNICE& 15518 SW 114TH CT#55 ALLEN JACKIE F TIGARD,OR 97224 15695 SW 114TH CT UNIT 3 TIGARD,OR 97224 2S 110DC-90011 2S 110DC-00500 HOWELLS JOHN& ELIZABETH ANN LUTON ROBERT C 2027 N FOREST CT do KVERNLAND ERIC B CANBY,OR 97013 11445 SW SUMMERFIELD DR TIGARD,OR 97224 2S1 1 OD C-90491 2S 110 DC-90212 HUGHES STANLEY F TRUSTEE MACKEY ROBERT A/MARCIA J TRS 15522 SW 114TH CT 15605 SW 114TH CT#21 TIGARD, OR 97224 TIGARD,OR 97224 2S 110DC-90091 2S1 10DC-90222 MARSHALL MARY RUTH& MILLER PATTY G GEORGE L JR 15605 SW 114TH CT#22 2560 AGATE ST TIGARD,OR 97224 EUGENE,OR 97403 2S 110DC-90512 2S 110DC-90151 MATTILA ERNEST L NEILS ELDOR S 15522 SW 114TH CT#51 NEILS CAROLYN H TIGARD,OR 97224 10330 W THUNDERBIRD BLVD APT C210 SUN CITY,AZ 85351 2S 110DC-90051 2S1 10DC-02100 MAY JOHN&JACQUELINE PORTLAND METRO PARTNERS 15695 SW 114TH CT UNIT 5 BY STERLING DEVELOPMENT CORP TIGARD,OR 97224 LA JOLLA CORPORATE CENTER 3252 HOLIDAY CT STE 225 LA JOLLA, CA 92037 251100D-00106 23 110DC-90332 MCCANN CAREL V JR RAMSTHEL MABEL J 15685 SW 116TH 15525 SW 114TH CT#33 KING CITY,OR 97224 TIGARD,OR 97223 2S1 10 D C-90201 2S1 10 DC-90522 MCDANIEL JUANITA M& RECKERS CHARLES W AND REX A MARGARET J TRUSTEES 15605 SW 114TH CT 15522 SW 114TH CT#52 TIGARD,OR 97224 TIGARD,OR 97224 2S1 10 D C-90342 2S 110DC-90321 MCDONALD RUTH S TRUSTEE RENDER JEANNE N 15525 SW 114TH CT#34 15525 SW 114TH CT TIGARD,OR 97224 TIGARD,OR 97224 2S 110 DC-90121 2S 110D C-90281 MCLELLAN BEATRICE C ROBBERSON DOUGLAS L& 15655 SW 114TH COURT#12 SUSAN K TIGARD,OR 97224 15525 SW 114TH CT TIGARD,OR 97224 2S1 10 D B-90362 2S 110DC-90602 MCMULLEN RICHARD D AND ROGERS THOMAS T/LA VERNE GERTRUDE M TRUSTEES 15518 SW 114TH CT#60 15485 SW 114TH CT#36 TIGARD,OR 97224 TIGARD,OR 97224 2S110DB-90442 2S110DC-90592 MESSINGER EDWARD J AND ANN B ROTH ROBERT E&MAE L 15483 SW 114TH CT#44 15518 SW 114TH CT#59 TIGARD,OR 97224 TIGARD,OR 97224 2S1 10D C-90451 23 110 DC-90172 METZGER ELNA L TRUSTEE RUDE SHIRLEY M& 15522 SW 114TH CT#45 CASWELL JEANNE M/MERRILL ERIC M& TIGARD,OR 97224 CASWELL TIMOTHY A/CASWELL PAULA 15605 SW 114TH CT#17 TIGARD,OR 97224 2S1 10 D C-90571 2S1 10D C-90061 RYAN THOMAS E&JOAN M TRUSTEES THOMAS CLEMENTINE C CO-TR& 15518 SW 114TH CT#57 THOMAS HOLLIS E CO-TR& TIGARD,OR 97224 THOMAS CYNTHIA J CO-TR 15695 SW 114TH CT#6 TIGARD,OR 97224 2S110DB-90392 2S110DC-02200 SCHENK SOPHIA M TIGARD CENTER LP 15485 SW 114TH CT#39 BY BARCLAY'S REALTY&MNGT CO TIGARD,OR 97224 9777 WILSHIRE BLVD STE 1009 BEVERLY HILLS,CA 90212 2S1100B-90351 2S110DB-90402 SCHROEDER MARJORY E TRUSTEE TILLINGHAST RUTH P TRUSTEE 15485 SW 114TH CT#35 15485 SW 114TH#40 TIGARD,OR 97224 TIGARD,OR 97224 2S 110DC-00300 2S1 10CD-07600 SSC PROPERTY HOLDINGS INC TOBIAS INVESTMENT CO BY PTA LLC-SHUR#38004 300 SE SPOKANE ST PO BOX 19156 PORTLAND,OR 97202 ALEXANDRIA,VA 22320 2S110DC-90132 110CD-07,10 STAYTON BARBARA JANE TO: :S (VESTMENT CO 15655 SW 114TH CT#13 300 ' '•KANE ST TIGARD,OR 97224 PORTLAND,OR 97202 2S1 10 D B-90432 2S 110C D-00105 STURGESS MARGARET I UNITED STATES NATIONAL BANK 15483 SW 114TH CT#43 BY US BANK PROPERTIES TIGARD,OR 97224 2800 EAST LAKE ST MINNEAPOLIS,MN 55406 2S110DC-01000 2S110DC-90241 SUMMERFIELD ASSOCIATES LLC VETTERLEIN CATHRYN J TRUST BY HSC REAL ESTATE 15565 SW 114TH CT#24 1500 SW FIRST AVE STE 1020 TIGARD,OR 97223 PORTLAND,OR 97201 110DD-00109 2S 110DC-90302 SU ■ ERFI• D ASSOCIATES LLC ZIEGELMAYER FRANCES M TRUSTEE BY HS• EAL ESTATE 15525 SW 114TH CT#30 150! W F ' T AVE STE 1020 TIGARD,OR 97224 •RTLAND,OR 97201 2S 110DC-90082 TENNENT MELVIN G/JANE B 15695 SW 114TH CT#8 TIGARD,OR 97224 25110DC-90581 TENTO ELEANOR E 15518 SW 114TH CT#58 TIGARD,OR 97224 Jack Biethan 11023 SW Summerfield Drive, #4 Tigard, OR 97224 Kristen Miller 8940 SW Edgewood Street Tigard, OR 97223 Paul Owen 10335 SW Highland Drive Tigard, OR 97224 Louise Fronville 15760 SW Oak Meadow Lane Tigard, OR 97224 Tim Esav PO Box 230695 Tigard, OR 97281 Nathan and Ann Murdock PO Box 231265 Tigard, OR 97281 Ross Sundberg 16382 SW 104th Avenue Tigard, OR 97224 CITY OF TIGARD - SOUTH CIT SUBCOMMITTEE (pg. I of I) (i:\curpin\setup\labels\CIT South.doc) UPDATED: January 11, 2002 Sent by: Mericom Corp. 5033033001 ; 04/01 /no 11 :35AM;Jeff #741 ;Page 1 /1 Received; 4/ 1 /02 11 :30A Mericom Corp. ; Page 1 04/01/2002 11:19 FAX 5036847297 City of Tigard (it 001 Tv Post-it'Fax Note 7671 06W / uat • CITY OF TIGARD Co./Dept. !11 COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT F * Phone /' �7�9' ;1,N ax PLANNING DIVISION . � ��/ �"" rr OFTMMARA rtity TDeue&pmt•nt 13123 SW HALL BOULEVARD Shaping A SetterCoenrncrticy TIGARD, OREGON 97213 • PHO11! 5O1-439-4171 FAIL S03-44•7297(Ater Putt'ur/hider/PlmnineJ R[UU[$1 FOR 5'00. FOOT PROPERTY OWNEIl MAILING Property owner information is valid-for 3 months from the date of your request INDICATE ALL PROJECT MAP & TAX LOT NUMBERS (.e. 1513W,Tax tot 00100)OR THE ADDRESSES FOR ALL PROJECT PARCELS BELOW and INCLUDE A MAP OF ALL LOTS OR THE PROJECT (preferably assessor's tax map): ; / 7 Gv 5 LAD �� t INDICATE WHETHER YOU ARE REQUESTING 2 OR 3 SETS Of LABELS: 7l1t ' e (NOTE: A.minimum of 2 sets of labels will be provided to place on your 2 sets of envelopes that applicants are required to submit at the time of application submittal_ If a neighborhood meeting is required and you have not yet held that meeting,you should request 3 sets) NAME OF CONTACT PERSON: ED Foc)ei -F'(4�L PHONE: 5 )3'-_,..70i'-yb l 2 • This request may be mailed, faxed, or hand delivered to the City of Tigard. Please allow a 2-day minimum for processing requests_ Upon completion of your request, the contact person will be called to pick up their request in "Will Call" by their last name, at the Community Development Reception Desk. The cost of processing your request must be paid at the time of pick up, as exact cost can not be pre-determined. PLEASE NOTE: FOR REASONS OF ACCURACY, ONLY ORIGINAL MAILING LABELS PROVIDED BY THE CITY NS. RE-TYPED MAILING LABELS WILL BE ACCEPTED. Cost Description; • SI I ti generate the mailing fist, plus S2 per sheet for printing the list onto tags (20 addresses per sheet). Then, multiply the cost to print one set of labels by the number of sets requested. * EXAMPLE*- * * COST FOR THIS REQUEST * * 4 sheets or 1-abets x 12/sheet = Ss.00 x sets = S 16.00 7` sheets)al labels $2/sheet = T 4 _ x jets = 2 sheers of labels x S2/shrct for OT arrz r 2 seri = S 4 OA ! sherds) of!Ads r S7Jshert for at aru S o? x gels = S_ GENERATE UST = SILOO GENERATE IJST. TOTAL = S3 LOO �D`� C'lI TOTAL = S�9 Received: 4/15/02 7:30AM; -,' Mericom Corp. ; Page 2 04/15/4,2 ,07: 19 FAX 206652373( SHURGARD Z002 ricom Corp. __ 5033033001 ; 04/12/02 8:27AM;JALE #184;Page 2 • SITE DEVELOPMENT REVIEW ,. ,.., I,� TYPE II APPLICATION te i a, L.\,1 J CITY OF TIGARD 13125 SW Hall Blvd., Tigard, OR 97223(503) 639-4171 FAX:(503) 684-7297 ?-tar-)6 -am23 PRE-APP. HELD WITH: Morgan GENERAL INFORMATION- DATE OF PRE-APP.: 3-28-02 • • Property AddressII ocatlon(s): MR.STAFF.USE.ONLY. 15700 SW Pacific Highway Tax Map &Tax Lot#(s): 2S110DC00300 ,`� 4 -(s ;. 41_ 4 owl :'t tit roa►** _): its _i_A• . •tr . 4.64 AC `:rtaa4 itflo.'. ..,s f•i ..'' r . Site Size: . . A''47:• Salmon PCS, L , Mericom Corp as Agent + •' t-'.!' •. ' Applicant`: ,. E ., Address: 25977 SW Canyon Creek Road, Suite E � W ID '7`i4r'RY..- City/State.Wilsonville, OR Zip: Primary Contact: Ed Fournier Phone: 503-303-3012_ Fax: 503-303-3001 — �� - REQUIRED SUBMITTAL ELEMENTS Property Owner/Deed Holder(s)': (Attach Irst If more than one) (Note: applications will n be accepted SSC Property Holdings Inc without the required submittal elements) i Address: 1 155 Bailey St, #440 Phone:206-624-8100 1 plication Form City/State: Seattle, WA Zip: 98109 /Owner's Signature/Written Authorization (Title Transfer Instrument or Deed When the owner and the applicant are different people,The applicant Copy of Pre-Application Conf. Notes i must be the purchaser of record or a lessee in possession with written authorization from the owner or an agent of the owner. The owner(s) Site/Piot Plan must sign this application in the space provided on the back of this (#of copies based on pre-app check list) form or submit a written authorization with this application. d Site/Plot Plan (reduced 8'/,"x 11") PROPOSAL SUMMARY 1 Applicant's Statement (#of copies based on pre-app check list) The owners of record of the subject property request Site '41 CWS Sewer Use Information Card Development Review approval to allow (please be specific); \' (pistrlbuted/compreted al app cation submittal) Construction of a 80' mono-pole and place equipment inside ;Z. CWS Service Provider Letter existing storage units. ►`►. 2 Sets of Pre-Addressed/Pre-Stamped #10 Envelopes & Copy of 500' Property i Owner List Generated by the City ® eighbortiood Mtg.Affidavits 8 Notes I Filing Fee: .- ......•i 80 . (it Million a o . ver) $1,780.00 ,-- t+C..%tflMile ewr e,n drat millien1 Urban: (See wssnin($cn county fee schedule) 1 Received: '7:30AM; -> Mericom Corp. ; Page 3 04/15/02 07:20 FAX 206652373( SHURGARD I�j003 #�g4,pa9e yip - 04I 02 g:27A�M1:l�l� — 5033033001 ; , Mericom Corp . List to be considered as prSITIVE LANDS, OR OTHER LAND USE A G CONDITIONAL USE,S st any VARIANCE, lion: ed from landscaping requirements due to the unique part of this application: site development as a landscaping placed as part of the original Applicant has submitted for a variance to be excused the site, and the extensive existing mature Serve storage center. _—__- -- ^�____.-...._._ -.____—__ - E DIRE SUBMt A� EL MENTS a _ con complete, you will need to submit ALL of the ___. A r-CANTS: Submittal Elements" boX�____ —_� application in the Required of Land Use Applications.) To consider an application � p �� upon request,for all types (Detailed on the front this a if -- sheets can be obtained. po (Detailed Submittal Requirement Information shale THE APPUCANT(S)SHALL CERTIFY THAT= a • ac led a rim•osed u o The •ba i•: • est does no o -. : an deed resuc cis hat � a 6,,,,, dance with the terms and sUbj�' iicant will exercise the rights granted in accor � if the application is granted, the app� all the conditions and limitations of the approval. e statements and the statements in the plot plan, attachments, and exhibits transmitted herewith, Ali of the above unit issued, based on this application, may be revoked if � applicants so aclorwwiedge that any permit true; and the app found that any such statements are false. policies and criteria,and understand • applicant has read the entire contents of the application, including the P The irep requirements for appro ving or denying the application. SIGNATURES of mil owner of the subject property. f 20_12_1-DATED this day of / •• Owner's Signature, 1) / ' 5)1 Gtr 0 4/4 S4rAT - 6614q- • •K' er's Slgflatu Owner's Signature Owner's Signature Received: 4/15/02 7:31AM; -> Mericom Corp. ; Page 4 04/1.5/02 .07:20 FAX 206652373( SHURGARD _ X004 04/12/02 8:28AM;Wfm_#184;Page 4/5 y: kericoa Corp. 5033033001 ; Aksi VARIANCE „ TYPE II APPLICATION CITY 0 Of f TIt3ARD 13925 SW Hall S/vd., Tgard, OR 97223(503) 639-4171 FAX:(b03) 684-7297 V Pie30);"--MO 7 ,-e.rcoel INFORMATIQN PRE-APP. HELD WITH: Morgan DATE OF PRE-APP.: 0412 Properly Address/Location(s): 7:� }.,. ; 15700 SW Pacific HI•hwar�y � ��ti��r T.t�1E.E*.? dq ~ Tax Map S Tax tot#{s): 2S110DC0030D iill _l k1; �k''"?.�V1„r • 4 ,;., �. 11::4-1131-- si "f rye n ,6'S `3' *4 44_'r2r'+'-';',....o, r} . it r Site Size 4.64 Ac �r";q-lit,'��' . ..,, .4 t:� ' " j Property Owner/Deed Holder(sp: SSC Property Holdings ,sue; s ,,., <- •,;,g -a` • , •'u op tit icf r�r.� ?l Address: 1155 Valley St.,#400 Zip: 9 208-624-8100 �� •I r i , - r ry Zip: 98109 '� P°5 1% zs ,« ., '``1 ,tely.. City: Seattle, WA i-1irptfat.-.,, -•i ;taw s . ' -,,'Irk,'Z'70 TN' Applicant.: almon PCS, LLC: Mericom Cor•oratlon as A•ent . r, 'i(� .o � s t e�: -o:,.,; Address' 25977 SW Can on Cic Phone:503- 0 - ;a, a�,r ^mil" ,„-i..�' �- ,tip -.. , Zip: 97070 fr, -fig q.'4 s'1 .-.44 - . - , Wilsonville, OR _ , . ;.:144, `t,"'1 City: fi ,a� i,��,; �T_ �°�-��, ` �. �,�� 1 z j�' yr II� �r;,f "��}',J�� Yi;'��4r��Y# Xi'pli l'r� '. iaH the applicant i,4 ,,v�, ,.• n ,,r ".,�r •When the owner and the applicant are different people, �7 � P" �4;A,I-t--.4 -, -�71 must be the purchaser of record or a lessee in possession with written '1/4 ��: ��.t �-t��y � � ,T' �•' .� S tIr� '4¢,.4.y,. L1;cF h, �j� yet ..: ,r. authorization from the owner or an agent of the owner. The owns ;,_�- ` must sign this application In the space provided on the back of this form or submit a written authorization with this application. The owners of record of the subject property request permission for a ^ REQU(R DBMfTTAE._EL><NENTS Variance to the following provision(s)of the Community Development ! (Note: applications will aid be accepted Code(please circle one only): without the required submittal elements) D Arkelnisanitive vas i 545 I [.� Application Form 5 Special Adjustments-. s 545 •A1gess staddardsAdjustment $ 545 Owner's Signature/Written Authorization • Parking Adjustments - on in Nee,Development/Transit lancing tff t Improvement 1 545 Tttle Transfer Instrument or Deed -Reduction h Exi Oevelopmantlr 545 -R On n eida of Deyelpprrenutranari Ir"P nt $ Si(elPiot Plan -ircrease In Maximum Parking Ratio $ 545 -Reduction in Biojde Paridng f 545 (N ot,copies based on pro-app check list) -AlternativeParkingGarageLaya,f $ ( Ito/Plot/Plot Plan (reduced 8'/2"x 11") r• • Tres Removal val Adi4i°t $ sas Applicant's Statement Tree esmwal►uNetmenl Residence S 545 on pre Cher*list) •Wireless Communication Facility y Adjustment-Setback from Nearby $ I o!copies based P aPP •street • • - -nt -•'u 'ant Sets of Pre-Addresseti/Pre Stampe #10 Envelopes & Copy of 500' Prop& Please state the reason for the Variance request: #10 Er List Generated by the 'P Applicant desires to be exempted from the landscaping y.CE of Chapter 18.798.050.8.7. The existing development has (CZFiling Fee (Administrative)..............$ If mature landscaping in place and the proposed v location is surrounded by by storage buildings and asphalt. i 1 Received: 4/15/02 7:31AM; -> Mericom Corp- ; Page 5 04/15/02 07:21 FAX 206652373( SHURGARD 005 __ ----- #184 Page 5033033001 ; rr 04112/02 8128A9 � 1i— — t Mericom Corp. as art of this application: n OTHER LAND USE ACTIONS to be considered part ment inside of an I,.Ap any VARIANCE OR OT ment of a 80' mono-pole and placement of eq P Applicant is submitting a SCR for develop existing self-storage unit. - - — ALL of the IRED SU application complete, you will need to submit APPLICANTS: wired Submittal Elements" box. Y_ Applications.) To consider an apo In the "Required d Sub request,for all types of Land Use APP (Detailed on the front of this t i application-- - obtained,upon r� {Qetailed Subm;ttal Requirement Information sheets can be 1CANT(S)SHALL CERTIFY THAT: su THE gPpi. ,• ,� y. - � . � � i • .la a an deed re _'n ,,s _i. ii : • -. s-: QLQA in accordance with the terms and subject • application is granted, the applicant will exercise the rights granted If the apP naval. the conditions and limitations of the app plot plan,attachments, and exhibits transmitted d�It is ed a that any permit issued, based on this application, may• All of the above statements and the statements In the p P and the applicants so acicno'�+t any such statements are false. understan • entire contents of the application, including the policies and criteria. and The applicant has read the or denying the application. requirements for approving SIGNATURES of ear&owner of the subject property. 2_ DATED this day of Shct • es Signature • r en's Slgnatu = � n Owner's Sl naturo• Owner's Signature Prop al//1/arraive Applicants Statement— Project Overview Salmon PCS, LLC (Salmon) proposes a new 80' mono-pole in the ShurGard Storage located at 15700 SW Pacific Highway. The ShurGard development has been approved via case file (CUP 88-09). The applicant is requesting approval of a Type II Site Design Review application and a Type II Variance application for landscaping. The applicable SRD fee of$800 is enclosed, as the proposed development costs shall be approximately $80,000, and the applicable Variance fee is enclosed of$109, representing 20% of the standard Variance fee, as the variance is being processed simultaneously with the Site Design Review. 2 antennas for each of 3 sectors will be attached onto the mono-pole via 5' davit arms at an elevation of 80'. The proposed installation consists of installing up to 5 small equipment cabinets approximately (30"x30"x60" tall)that will be located inside two of the storage units. As call volume increases at the site additional cabinets may be added. This pole is being designed to accommodate additional sections to easily increase the height and allow for additional collocations. Surplus space in the equipment area and mono-pole not reserved for future expansion by Salmon shall be made reasonably available for future collocation by other carriers. Impact to public facilities and services will be minimal. Access shall be via the existing paved parking lot from SW Pacific Highway. During construction or operation of the site, minimal traffic would be generated as a result of the facility. Once construction is completed, an equipment technician would visit the site approximately one time per month for routine maintenance purposes only. Telephone service and electrical power are the only public facilities required by the proposed site, and are available at the site at this time. Salmon's proposed site is an unmanned facility, and would not require any water, waste treatment or management of hazardous materials. No improvements to public facilities are needed to accommodate this development. The proposed communication facility will not interfere with surrounding properties or their uses, and will not cause interference with any electronic equipment, such as telephones, televisions, or radios. Non-interference is ensured by the Federal Communications Commission (FCC) regulation of radio transmissions. Salmon PCS Technology Similar to cellular technology, Salmon systems use "cells" or geographic coverage areas that resemble a honeycomb pattern to provide service. Typically, one antenna fixture and a base station area located within each cell area. The base station is comprised of equipment cabinets about the size of small refrigerators. The wireless PCS digital technology is emerging as a necessary emergency service and business tool, as well as a convenience for personal and family use. PCS will provide two-way mobile voice communication, two-way paging/short message service, data transmission, voice mail, and conference calling through compact devices. The new digital technology also produces a higher quality transfer of voice and data than the analog/digital hybrid systems currently in use by the cellular carriers. System Information Salmon, a Cingular Wireless affiliate, is currently developing a digital PCS (Personal Communications System) throughout Oregon. Upon completion of this network, Salmon will operate a state of the art digital network of wireless communication sites throughout Oregon, and in connection with other nationwide Cingular market areas. Mericom Corporation (Mericom) is responsible for the development of many of the Salmon sites and provides a broad range of professional services; to include program management, land use planning, site acquisition, construction management, and technical services. Mericom, on behalf of Salmon, has submitted this application. The proposed use would allow Salmon to provide the needed service to the surrounding community and to this heavily traveled portion of 99W. The need for specific service is determined by market demand, capacity requirements for a specific geographic area, and the need to provide continuous coverage from one site to another in a particular geographic region. Once the need for additional capacity or enhanced coverage in a particular area has been established, Salmon's Radio Frequency (RF) engineers identify a target area ("search ring") to locate a new facility. T he required site IO C ati° n a n d an ten n determined by an engineering study. This t udd evaluates radio sgnat pro pagat i°n over the coverage area based on topography, geographic possible t igna crucial for l attenuati n due to oahan9es / Ve ge is desirable e direct the station antennas the required oe a ge objectives.Based on th e topography t d e amount of traffic in the servicing area, Salmon's RF determined that the abov athe ab°V e tilted elevation on t he proposed tower would able ee Gnee thlvb ecesttatmOn t° have coverage in th sn order to them customers in compliance with its FCC/Gene regul anon s' lica b/e C°de ether specifics the proposed installation are addressed On the enclosed site plan and responses t0 appsecti°ns, includ pg8X98. NEIGHBORHOOD MEETING The required neighborhood meeting was held at 6pm on April 18th, 2002 at the Tigard Friends Church, 15800 SW Hall Blvd., Tigard, OR. The copy of the notice letter, mailing list, affidavit of mailing and posting, meeting attendance sheet and meeting notes are attached. SITE DEVELOPMENT REVIEW (18.360) Chapter 18.360.020 Applicability of Provisions Per the proposed mono-pole development is not exempt from this Chapter. 18.360.030 Approval Process A. New developments and major modifications. The proposed development falls into this category and shall be approved via a Type II review process. 18.360.050 Major Modification(s) to Approved Plans or Existing Development A. Determination request. An applicant may request approval of a modification to an approved plan or existing development by The applicant is proposing a development which is a permitted use in the CG zone, subject to a Type II Site Development Review Application. The required application and submittal materials comprise this request. 18.360.070 Submission Requirements A. General submission requirements. The applicant shall submit an application containing all of the general information required for a Type I1 procedure, as governed by Section 18.390.040. Please see the enclosed Type II application form. B. Additional information. In addition to the submission requirements required in Chapter 18.390, Decision-Making Procedures, an application for the conceptual development plan must include the following additional information in graphic, tabular and/or narrative form. The Director shall provide a list of the specific information to be included in each of the following:..... The required plans are subsequently listed in this Chapter. All required plans are attached to this application in the Site Plans section. 18.360.080 Exceptions to Standards B. Exceptions to parking requirements. The Director may grant an exception or deduction to the offstreet parking dimensional and minimum number of space requirements in the applicable zoning district based on the following findings: 1. The application is for a use designed for a specific purpose which is intended to be permanent in nature, e.g., senior citizen housing, and which has a demonstrated low demand for off-street parking; During construction or operation of the site, minimal traffic would be generated as a result of the facility. Once construction is completed, an equipment technician would visit the site approximately one time per month for routine maintenance purposes only. C. Exceptions for private or shared outdoor area...... This section of the Chapter is not applicable. D. Exceptions to landscaping requirements. The Director shall grant an exception to the landscaping requirements of this code, Section 18.120.150, upon finding that the overall landscape plan provides for at least 20 of the gross site to be landscaped. Please see the attached application for a Type II Variance (Request for Landscaping Variance) and associated narrative covering Chapter 18.370.010. 18.360.090 Approval Criteria A. Approval criteria. The Director shall make a finding with respect to each of the following criteria when approving, approving with conditions, or denying an application: 1. Compliance with all of the applicable requirements of this title including Chapter 18.810, Street and Utility Standards; Chapter 18.810 is addressed specifically above in its own narrative paragraph. 2. Relationship to the natural and physical environment: a. Buildings shall be• This Chapter is not applicable as no new buildings are proposed upon the site. b. Trees shall be preserved to the extent possible. Replacement of trees is subject to the requirements of Chapter 18.790, Tree Removal. All existing trees shall be preserved upon the site. Please see the above narrative sections specifically addressing Chapters 18.790 and the associated Arborist Report attachment. 3. Exterior elevations:.... This Chapter is not applicable as no new buildings are proposed upon the site. 4. Buffering, screening and compatibility between adjoining uses Please see the below listed narrative addressing Chapter 18.745 Buffering and Screening. 5. Privacy and noise:multi-family or group living uses: through 11. Public transit: These Chapters are not applicable. 12. Landscaping: The parcel is currently developed as a self storage, and this Chapter was addressed during the approval of the original storage center development. No changes to the previously approved landscaping are proposed. Wireless Communications Facilities are further governed by Chapter 18.798.050. Please see the attached narrative addressing these criteria specific to Wireless Communications Facilities and the requested variance. 13. Drainage:All drainage plans shall be designed in accordance with the criteria in the adopted 1981 master drainage plan; The parcel is currently developed as a self storage, and this Chapter was addressed during the approval of the original storage center development. No changes to the previously approved drainage are proposed. 14. Provision for the disabled:All facilities for the disabled shall be designed in accordance with the requirements set forth in ORS Chapter 447;and The parcel is currently developed as a self storage, and this Chapter was addressed during the approval of the original storage center development. No changes to the previously approved provisions for the disabled are proposed. 15. All of the provisions and regulations of the underlying zone shall apply unless modified by other sections or this title, e.g., Planned Developments, Chapter 18.350;or a variance or adjustment granted under Chapter 18.370. This proposed development complies with the applicable Section of the underlying CG zone. Exceptions are as permitted via the Type II Variance application governed by Chapter 18.370, and Wireless Communications Facilities as governed by Chapter 18.798 REQUEST FOR LANDSCAPING VARIANCE—CHAPTER 18.370.010 C. Approval process and standards. 1. Variances shall be processed by means of a Type II procedure, as governed by Section 18.390.040, using standards of approval contained in Subsection 2 below. A Type II Variance Application form is attached to this land use approval submittal. 2. The Director shall approve, approve with conditions, or deny an application for a variance based on finding that the following criteria are satisfied: a. The proposed variance will not be materially detrimental to the purposes of this title, to any other applicable policies and standards, and to other properties in the same zoning district or vicinity; This requested variance will not be detrimental to City title or standards nor to other properties in the vicinity of the proposed wireless development. b. There are special circumstances that exist which are peculiar to the lot size or shape, topography or other circumstances over which the applicant has no control, and which are not applicable to other properties in the same zoning district; Chapter 18.798.050.B.7 requires landscaping to screen the new wireless development form adjacent properties. In the initial approval for this property as a mini-storage facility, extensive landscaping was installed along Pacific Highway and along the southerly property and northerly property lines. This landscape has matured over the years and now provides an impressive buffer along the southern property line with 12' high arborvitae and along the northerly property line with 30' conifer trees. Screening from Pacific Highway to the west and the adjacent property to the east is offered via the existing self storage buildings. Further, the planting of evergreen trees or other landscaping is not feasible. The telecommunications equipment shall be located within an existing building, and completely screened from view. The site is currently developed as a storage center, with the land area being completely covered by storage buildings and asphalt driveways and maneuvering areas. In conclusion, with the extensive screening offered by existing buildings and landscaping, the proposed exterior fenced area will be well screened from adjacent properties. c. The use proposed will be the same as permitted under this title and City standards will be maintained to the greatest extent that is reasonably possible while permitting reasonable economic use of the land; Please see the response to 18.370.010.b above. The proposed use of a wireless communications facility will adhere to all other City standards. d. Existing physical and natural systems, such as but not limited to traffic, drainage, dramatic land forms or parks will not be adversely affected any more than would occur if the development were developed as specified in the title; and No physical or natural systems shall be impacted by forgoing the requirement to place landscaping adjacent to the fenced area. e. The hardship is not self-imposed and the variance requested is the minimum variance which would alleviate the hardship. This hardship is not self-imposed, but reasonable considering the extensive existing mature landscaping and the site being covered by existing asphalt and storage buildings. The request for a variance from the required landscaping required by Chapter 18.798.050.B.7 is the minimum variance needed to alleviate this hardship. IMPACT STUDY (Chapter 18.390) Impact to public facilities and services will be minimal. Access shall be via the existing paved parking lot from SW Pacific Highway. During construction or operation of the site, minimal traffic would be generated as a result of the facility. Once construction is completed, an equipment technician would visit the site approximately one time per month for routine maintenance purposes only. Telephone service and electrical power are the only public facilities required by the proposed site, and shall be arranged with the local service providers. Salmon's proposed site is an unmanned facility, and would not require any water, waste treatment or management of hazardous materials. No improvements to public facilities are needed to accommodate this development. COMMERCIAL ZONING DISTRICTS (Chapter 18.520) In general this Chapter described allowable uses in Commercial Districts. Specifically, Chapter 18.520.030 (Table 18.520.1) lists Wireless Communications Facilities as a Permitted use, subject to Chapter 18.798. Table 18.520.2 lists numerical criteria for this District. While the proposed mono-pole development is specifically subject to Chapter 18.798, but please note that, the proposed development exceeds the setback requirements, and does not modify the landscaping nor site coverage percentages. Only the height of the proposed mono-pole (80')exceeds the underlying Zoning District (CG) requirements of 45' maximum. However, this height is under the permitted 100' allowed by Chapter 18.798. Chapter 18.520.60 lists no additional criteria or guidelines for the CG Zone. ACCESS (Chapter 18.705 ) The parcel is currently developed as a self storage facility with a primary access point to SW Pacific Highway. This Chapter was addressed during the approval of the original storage center development. No changes to the previously approved access is proposed. Current requirements are met with at least 1 access point meeting the minimum access width of 30' and the minimum pavement width of 24'. SPECIAL SETBACKS (Chapter 18.730) The parcel is currently developed as a self storage, and this Chapter was addressed during the approval of the original storage center development. No changes to the previously approved setbacks are proposed. Wireless Communications Facilities are further governed by Chapter 18.798.050. Please see the attached narrative addressing these criteria specific to Wireless Communications Facilities. BUFFERING AND SCREENING (Chapter 18.745) The parcel is currently developed as a self storage, and this Chapter was addressed during the approval of the original storage center development. No changes to the previously approved buffering and screening are proposed. Wireless Communications Facilities are further governed by Chapter 18.798.050. Please see the attached narrative addressing these criteria specific to Wireless Communications Facilities and the requested variance. OFF-STREET PARKING /LOADING (Chapter 18.765) • The parcel is currently developed as a self storage facility with designated parking adjacent to Pacific Highway and undesignated parking throughout the development. This Chapter was addressed during the approval of the original storage center development. No changes to the previously approved loading or parking areas are proposed. Chapter 18.765.040 sets no minimum requirement for parking for wireless telecommunications developments. As with all other users of the self storage facility, Salmon shall utilize the undesignated parking areas adjacent to its leased premises for the infrequent technician visit to the site. Once construction is completed, an equipment technician would visit the site approximately one time per month for routine maintenance purposes only. PARKING (Chapter 18.765.040) Please see the above narrative addressing Off-street parking / loading (Chapter 18.765). TREE PLAN REQUIREMENTS (Chapter 18.790.030) The parcel is currently developed as a self storage, and this Chapter was addressed during the approval of the original storage center development. No changes to the previously approved buffering and screening trees are proposed. Attached is the Arborists Report which is a protection program as developed by a certified arborist. The Arborists Report specifies that with the required separation between the existing trees and the proposed utility trench, no adverse impact shall occur to the existing trees. MITIGATION (Chapter 18.790.060) Salmon's proposal calls for preservation and protection of all existing trees. Please see the attached Arborist Report discussed above under Tree Planting Requirements. CLEAR VISION AREA (Chapter 18.795) The parcel is currently developed as a self storage, and this Chapter was addressed during the approval of the original storage center development. No changes to the previously approved clear vision areas are proposed. WIRELESS COMMUNICATIONS FACILITIES (CHAPTER 18.798.050) A. Uses permitted. The Director shall review the uses subject to Site Development Review, as regulated by Chapter 18.360, using approval criteria contained in Section B below. The following uses are subject to approval under this section: 1. Towers in commercial zones and the I-P zone. A tower, including antennas, other support equipment and/or accessory equipment buildings, in any commercial or I-P district, provided that such a tower shall be set back from any existing off-site residence by a distance equal to the height of the tower; The proposed new 80' mono-pole meets the above listed requirements to be permitted in the CG zone, subject to a Site Development Review. B. Review criteria. Any use subject to Site Development Review per Section A above, shall be evaluated using the following standards: 1. Aesthetic: a. New towers shall maintain a non-reflective gray finish or, if required by the FAA, be painted pursuant to the FAA's requirements; The new mono-pole shall be non-reflective steel and gray in color. Further weathering of the pole shall enhance the dull gray color and blend the mono-pole with the frequently cloudy skies. b. If collocation on an existing tower is requested, the design of any antenna(s), accessory structures or equipment shall, to the extent possible, use materials, colors and textures that will match the existing tower or non-tower structure to which the equipment of the collocating provider is being attached; This is a new mono-pole development. The proposed antennas and attachment hardware shall be of a similar dull gray non-reflective color as described in the above Section B.1.a c. If collocation on an existing non-tower structure is requested, the antenna(s) and supporting electrical and mechanical equipment shall be a neutral color that is the same as the color as the supporting structure so as to make the antenna(s) and related equipment as visually unobtrusive as possible. This is a new mono-pole development. See the comments for Section B.1.c above. 2. Setbacks: a. Towers designed to collapse within themselves shall be set back in accordance with the setbacks contained in the base zone; The proposed mono-pole is 80' feet in height and set back 112'feet from the closest northerly property line. b. Towers not designed to collapse within themselves shall be set back from the property line by a distance equal to the height of the tower. The proposed mono-pole is 80' feet in height and set back 112'feet from the closest northerly property line, exceeding this requirement by over 30' 3. Tower spacing: No new tower shall be allowed within 500 feet of an existing tower. lf, having completed the collocation protocol outlined in Section 18.798.080 without success, the provider will be required to build a tower less than 500 feet from an existing tower, it will be required to obtain a Type I adjustment governed by 18.370.020 C8b; The nearest towers are southerly on Hwy 99W outside of the Tigard City limits, and beyond the 500 foot requirement. 4. Tower height: No tower shall exceed 100 feet for a single user or 125 for multiple users; The proposed height of this tower is 80 feet. It is designed to accommodate future collocation. Salmon PCS supports collocation, and has considered multiple carriers in the design of the mono-pole and equipment area. 5. Lighting: No lighting shall be permitted on a tower except as required by the FAA; No lighting is planned. 6. Fencing and security: For security purposes, towers and ancillary facilities shall be enclosed by a minimum six-foot fence; The proposed mono-pole is located upon private property and inside of a secured storage center compound. Access to the property is controlled on a 24x7 basis. The telecommunications equipment shall be placed inside of an existing storage building and completely screened from view. The mono-pole shall be placed upon a concrete pad, and enclosed by chain link fencing to eliminate the mono-pole from being an attractive nuisance. 7. Landscaping and screening: a. Landscaping shall be placed outside the fence and shall consist of evergreen shrubs which reach six feet in height and 95% opacity within three years of planting; Planting of landscaping is not feasible. The telecommunications equipment shall be located within an existing building, and completely screen from view. The mono-pole shall be placed outside of the existing building and enclosed with chain link fencing. As the mono-pole is 112' from the closest property line, existing landscaping and buildings will obstruct the view of the mono-pole base from adjacent properties. Please see the attached request for a Type II Variance and associated narrative addressing the requirements of Chapter 18.370.10. b. When adjacent to or within residentially-zoned property, free-standing towers and accessory equipment facilities shall be screened by the planting of a minimum of four evergreen trees at least 15 feet in height at the time of planting. The planting of said trees shall be prescribed in number by a plan prepared by a registered arborist in locations that(1) most effectively screen the wireless facilities from residential uses and(2)promote the future survival of the trees while limiting adverse effects of the trees on abutting properties. Existing evergreen trees at least 15 feet in height may be used to meet the screening requirement of this section if the arborist demonstrates that they provide screening for abutting residential uses; Planting of evergreen trees is not feasible. The telecommunications equipment shall be located within an existing building, and completely screened from view. The site is currently developed as a storage center, with the land area being completely covered by storage buildings and asphalt driveways and maneuvering areas. Please see the attached request for a Type II Variance and associated narrative addressing the requirements of Chapter 18.370.10. 8. Noise: Noise-generating equipment shall be sound-buffered by means of baffling, barriers or other suitable means to reduce the sound level measured at the property line to 50 dBA (day)/40 dBA (night) when adjacent to a noise-sensitive land use and 75 dBA (day)/60 dBA (night) when adjacent to other uses. The proposed development complies with the above listed noise levels. The equipment produces minimal noise and shall be located inside of an existing steel building. The building in which the telecommunications equipment shall be located is surrounded by other similar steel storage buildings, which shall further buffer the minimal noise produced. C. Other requirements. At the time a provider requests a building permit, it must demonstrate compliance to all applicable state and federal regulations, including, but not limited to, the Oregon Uniform Structural and Building Codes and FAA. Salmon shall comply with applicable state and federal regulations, and provide the required evidence upon the request for a building permit. STREET & UTILITY IMPROVEMENT STANDARDS (Chapter 18.810) The parcel is currently developed as a self storage, and this Chapter was addressed during the approval of the original storage center development. No changes to the previously approved street and improvements are proposed. The exception is the underground electrical and telecommunications utilities to be extended to the proposed development site as governed by 18.818.120 Utilities. This criteria is addressed upon the attached Site Plans. Site Plans �Z �'r 'aCI ;1 e; 4 0_ (6.-41 I— V Ua I �; PT327O1 g= .:3V:A 41,4. { 15700 SW PACIFIC °- � .*,, . . CIFIC HWY. ,..e- -A' yY�� TIGARD OR 97224 �� }{. . L�>F, rR�• ,, CO .;` / N Salmon PCS �`�� W r.H ui Th✓, _MI cep CU W m QJ F- Cn Z K • ' THIS PROJECT IS TO INSTALL A LOCAL PERSONAL COMMUNICATIONS SYSTEM ALL WORK AND MATERIALS SHALL BE PERFORMED AND INSTALLED IN I SHEET DESCRIPTION REV. (PCS) SITE WHICH WILL TRANSMIT AND RECEIVE RADIO SIGNALS AS PART ACCORDANCE WITH THE CURRENT E GOVERNING EDR UTH OF THE FOLLOWING I CODES AS y OF A REGIONAL PCS NETWORK FOR SALMON PCS, LLC IS OTED eY 7HE !OCAL IT W AUTHORITIES.NOT NOTHING IN ESE ODES. G1.0 TITLE SHEET 1 11X17 DRAWINGS IS TO BE CONSTRUED TO PERMIT WORK NOT CONFORMING TO THESE CO DES. ARE 50% REDUCTIONS THE MAIN COMPONENTS ARE: 1. OREGON STATE STRUCTURAL SPECIALTY CODE 1998 G2.O GENERAL NOTES, LEGEND &ABBREVIATIONS 1 (6)ANTENNAS MOUNTED ON A NEW MONOPOLE 0 BO'-O'C.L. 2. ANSI/ETA-222-7 LIFE SAFETY CODE NFPA-101-1990 `c�`CC'�EDCa EXIT (2) EQUIPMENT CABINETS ARE PLACED INSIDE AN EXISTING STORAGE FACILITY, ADJACENT TO THE NEW MONOPOLE. 3. NATIONAL ELECTRIC CODE 1996 Cl.0 TOPOGRAPHIC SURVEY 0 C.2 5MM M.K.PLOIN n Ct ^3 PROJECT DESCRIPTION - CODE COMPLIANCE `�q�T"° °�"o•4‘'''' It �'OF �R A1.0 EXISTING CONDRIONS, VICINITY AREA, & SITE DEVELOPMENT PLAN 1 APPLICANT/ LESSEE: ARCHITECT: PRIMARY A1.1 ENLARGED 517E PLAN Nk EQUIP. ELEVATIONS 1 I • GAZLEY•SALMON PCS,LLC GAZLEY PLOWMAN ARCHITECTS CONTACT: A2.0 ELEVATIONS 1 PLOWMAN Q ARCHITECTS 123 NE 3RD AVENUE, SUITE 240 2701 NW VAUGHT:,SUITE 764 �+ AN PORTLAND, OR 97232 PORTLAND, OR 97219 MERICOM 2701 NW Vaughn Slim 764 PHONE: (503) 706-4253 CONTACT: DEAN HOOUE 25977 SW CANYON CREEK RD.,STE E A2.1 ELEVATIONS 1 Ponland Or.97210 • PHONE: 503' 274-7800 x 237 WILSONVILLE, OR 97070 5032747&q SITE ~�� FAX: (503)274-7803 CONTACT: ED FOURNIER 503 2 74 7803 Fax • PHONE: (503) 303-3000 DATE: 0412310'c SW 13 F Bhp ROAD SW DURHAM ROAD PROPERTY INFORMATION: SURVEYOR: ZONING: 303-3001 : REVISIONS I © OWNER: SHURGARD STORAGE CENTERS INC. DEA INC. MERICOM REV.: DATE: DESCRIPTION: BY: 2828 SW CORBETI AVE. 25977 SW CANYON CREEK RD.,STE E ADDRESS: 15700 SW PACIFIC HWY. PORTLAND, OR 97201 WILSONVILLE, OR 97070 TIGARD, OR 97224 CONTACT: DAVID BATEMAN CONTACT: ED FOURNIER PHONE: 503� 223-6663 PHONE: (503) 303-3000 _ CONTACT: MARY MEIER/SHANNON SHAFER FAX: 503, 223-2701 FAX: (503) 303-3001 - PHONE: 206-652-3740/503-684-5564 AREA OF CONSTRUCTION: APPROXIMATELY 200 SO. FT. CURRENT ZONING: C-G(GENERAL COMMERCIAL) Q1 4/23/02 ISSUED FOR DL ZONING ZONING APPLICATION i: _____ QO 3/27/02 ZONING REVIEW DL VICINITY MAP I� ,ON: - SITE N�a7.n7 A.DA. REQUIREMENTS: FACILITY IS UNMANNED AND NOT FOR PT32 -01 HUMAN HABITATION. HANDICAPPED ACCESS NOT REQUIRED. FROM DOWNTOWN PORTLAND, TAKE I-5 SOUTH TO EXIT 294 FOR TIGARD/ NEWBURG. CONSTRUCTION EXIT 1-5 TO BARBUR BLVD. AND FOLLOW BARBUR BLVD. SOUTH TOWARDS TIGARD FOR MANAGER: 15700 SW PACIFIC HWY. 3.75 MILES. BARBUR BLVD. BECOMES SW PACIFIC HWY. SHURGARD STORAGE IS ON THE TIGARD.OR LEFT AND MAY BE ACCESSED ONLY FROM THE NORTH BOUND LANES OF PACIFIC HWY. 123 NE 3RD AVE. SPITE 420 97224 U-TURN IS PERMITTED AT DURHAM ROAD. PORTLAND, OR, 9723i _ CONTACT: JASON AORVAT PHONE: 503) 201-2999 TITLE SHEET FAX, 503) 536-9696 - DRIVING DIRECTIONS PROJECT SUMMARY PROJECT TEAM SHEET INDEX JOB No. 02-045 jGENERAL NOTES J ABBREVIATIONS f=: R LEGEND 6�-�z i,i 1. CONTRACTOR SHALL VERIFY ALL DIMENSIONS AND CONDITIONS ON SITE. SYMBOLS �� >; G S SYMBOLS 0 a.:'—c ? 2. CONTRACTOR IS NOT TO OBTAIN DIMENSIONS THROUGH MEASUREMENT OF THESE SCALED DRAWINGS. USE < ANGLE CA GAUGE 5B0 SUPPLIED BY OWNER ONLY THE DIMENSIONS INDICATED ON THESE DRAWINGS. SHOULD ADDITIONAL DIMENSIONS BE REQUIRED, 0 AT GALV GALVANIZED SC SOLID CORE LI CONTACT THE ARCHITECT FOR CLARIFICATION. o DIAMETER or ROUND GB GYPSUM BOARD SCHED SCHEDULE DETAIL No. Q I PERPENDICULAR GBx GYPSUM BOARD SECT SECTION � DETAIL ROOM NAME ROOM NAME ce 3. BEFORE ORDERING ANY MATERIAL OR DOING ANY WORK. THE CONTRACTOR SHALL VERIFY IN THE FIELD ALL I POUND or NUMBER (TYPE -5") SHC SHEATHING V REFERENCE 1 0000 I ROOM NUMBER I DIMENSIONS AND ELEVATIONS WHICH ARE REQUIRED FOR CONNECTIONS TO, OR INSTALLATION IN EXISTING / PER or OVER GFI GROUND FAULT CIRCUIT SHT SHEET SHEET No T�f o-�, y STRUCTURES, AND FOR MODIFICATIONS INSIDE EXISTING STRUCTURE, AND SHALL BE RESPONSIBLE FOR THE Q CENTER LINE INTERRUPTER SIM SIMILAR O'-0' HEIGHT ' r CORRECTNESS OF THE SAME. R PLATE GLB CLUE LAMINATED BEAM SPEC a =� GRND GROUND SPECIFICATIONS BUILDING �A.F.F. MARKER Et =4, SO SQUARE 3 p _ W K PERFORMED AND MATERIALS INSTALLED SHALL BE IN STRICT ACCORDANCE WITH ALL APPLICABLE A CPS GLOBAL POSITIONING SS SECTION W !'_; CODES, REGULATIONS, AND ORDINANCES. CONTRACTOR SHALL GIVE ALL NOTICES AND COMPLY WITH ALL SYSTEM STAINLESS STEEL 1000.0'1 FINISH AB ANCHOR BOLT STD STANDARD \ SPOT GRADE e�°." LAWS, ORDINANCES. RULES, REGULATIONS AND LAWFUL ORDERS OF ANY PUBLIC AUTHORITY BEARING ON THE GRO GRADE STL STEEL i=^^ PERFORMANCE OF THE WORK. AC AIR CONDITIONING GYP GYPSUM STRUCT STRUCTURAL r-.1- ACCA ANTENNA CABLE H SUSP SUSPENDED O �• WALL SECTION 000.0 \ EXISTING U €S=i 7 5. THE CONTRACTOR SHALL BE SOLELY RESPONSIBLE FOR ALL CONSTRUCTION MEANS, METHODS. TECHNIQUES. COVER ASSEMBLY SPOT GRADE z�s. SEQUENCES AND PROCEDURES AND FOR COORDINATING ALL PORTIONS OF THE WORK UNDER THE CONTRACT. ACOUS ACOUSTICAL T / ACT ACOUSTICAL TILE HB HOSE BIB 6. PROVIDE ADEQUATE CLEARANCES BETWEEN ARCHITECTURAL. STRUCTURAL, MECHANICAL AND ELECTRICAL AO AREA DRAIN HC HOLLOW CORE T TOP 000 DOOR ADJ ADJUSTABLE HDR HEADER TEMP TEMPORARY ® ELEVATION Ali EXTERIOR NUMBER SYSTEMS. VERIFY PHYSICAL DIMENSIONS OF EQUIPMENT WITH AVAILABLE SPACE AND ACCESS ROUTES THROUGH CONCEALED SPACES. A.F.F. ABOVE FINISH FLOOR HDWD HARDWOOD T & G TONGUE AND GROOVE A.F.G. ABOVE FINISH GRADE HOWR HARDWARE THK THICK WINDOW AGGR AGGREGATE HGT HEIGHT �'T� TYPE 7. DETAILS ARE INTENDED TO SHOW END RESULT OF DESIGN. MINOR MODIFICATIONS MAY BE REQUIRED TO THRESH THRESHOLD SUIT JOB DIMENSIONS OR CONDITIONS, AND SUCH MODIFICATIONS SHALL BE INCLUDED AS PART OF THE A.C.L. ABOVE GROUND LEVEL NM HOLLOW METAL T.OA. TOP OF ANTENNA WORK. ALUM ALUMINUM HORIZ HORIZONTAL T.O.C. TOP OF CONCRETE O - GRID LINE O KEY ANT ANTENNA HR HOUR T.O.F. TOP OF FOUNDATION NOTE APROX APPROXIMATE B. THE CONTRACTOR SHALL MAKE NECESSARY PROVISIONS TO PROTECT EXISTING IMPROVEMENTS AND ADJACENT T.O.P. TOP OF PLATE _ CONSTRUCTION AND UPON COMPLETION OF WORK. REPAIR ANY DAMAGE THAT OCCURRED DURING ARCH ARCHITECTURAL I TOP O Ef) O WALL ASPH ASPHALT TYPE CONSTRUCTION TO THE SATISFACTION OF THE PROJECT MANAGER. T.O.S. TOP OF STEEL AWC AMERICAN WIRE IBC INSTALLED BY T.O.W. TOP OF WALL Iiiiiii—.'- MATCH LINE 9. PROVIDE A PORTABLE FIRE EXTINGUISHER WITH A RATING OF NOT LESS THAN 2-A OR 2-AIOBC WITHIN 75 GAUGE CONTRACTOR TYP TYPICAL FEET TRAVEL DISTANCE TO ALL PORTIONS OF THE PROJECT AREA DURING CONSTRUCTION. B LBO INSTALLED BY OWNER Oj TEYQPUIPMENT - ICGB ISOLATED COPPER U WORK POINT GROUND BUS irin BO BOARD ID INSIDE DIAMETER UC UNDER GROUND 1 Q REVISION BITUM BITUMINOUS IN. (7 INCH(ES) UL UNDERWRITERS BLDG BUILDING INSUL INSULATION LABORATORY © E v BLK BLOCK INT INTERIOR UNO UNLESS OTHERWISE INTERIOR o BLKG BLOCKING NOTED © ELEVATION N BM BEAM J W B.O.C. BOTTOM OF CURB V r BOX BOTTOM JT JOINT ilia m BTS BASE TRANSCEIVER - y SYSTEM K YEN VARIES O co BTWC BARE TINNED VENEER Z VERT VERTICAL EQUIPMENT COPPER WIRE KPL KICK PLATE w ! I.F. VERIFY IN FIELD co B/U BACK UP CABINET Q NEW ANTENNA Q O C L �o CAB CABINET LB (rP) LAG BOLT W/ WITH '¢ FIRE HYDRANT /� w g CEM CEMENT WO WOOD Cy Z o L.F. LINEAR FEET .7/0 WITHOUT LIGHT STANDARD /A Ki o CF COLUMN FACE L LONGITUDINAL) PP WATERPROOF v/ CIP CAST IN PLACE LT LIGHT '.tt WEIGHT CJ CONTROL JOINT INYM WOVEN WIRE MESH UTILITY POLE CLG CEILING N CLR CLEAR CMU CONCRETE MASONRY MACH MACHINE E—'— POLE GUY WIRE UNIT MAT MATERIAL 11x17 DRAWINGS COL COLUMN MAX MAXIMUM ARE 50% REDUCTIONS CONC CONCRETE MACH MECHANICAL CORN CONNECTION MEG MANUFACTURER MATERIALS \��p �C,� CONST CONSTRUCTION MEMB MEMBRANE `' CONT CONTINUOUS MN MANHOLE CSH CONCRETE SURFACE MIN MINIMUM HARDENER MISC MISCELLANEOUS • I CONCRETE I-*�'+-8_, --- -r;T EARTH SltivFll N.N.PL OMAN CTR CENTER MO MASONRY OPENING CTSK COUNTER SINK MID MOUNTED CMU ® GRAVEL D MIL METAL POR TIAMI,OREGON= MEAL MULLION ® BRICK 1 SAND d PENNY (NAILS) N q,+ OF O�.CC5 DB PLYWOOD G L DOUBLE I 1 GYPSUM WALLBOARD ® DEPT DEPARTMENT NIC NOT IN CONTRACT — DF DOUGLAS FIR No (j) NUMBER Ai BfltMR81fiTMU19 BATT INSULATION DA DIAMETER NOM NOMINAL FINISH WOOD GAZL.FY DIM DIMENSION NTS NOT TO SCALE �� DR DOOR ��t:-»--.-. =+:+-:.J RIGID INSULATION PLOWMAN 0 WOOD (CONT.) OIL DETAIL ARCHITECTS DWL DOWEL ® STEEL 2701 NW Vaughn E OC ON CENTER I WOOD BLOCKING Stoic 761 0D OUTSIDE DIAMETER Ponland,O.97210 EA EACH OPNG OPENING ® ALUMINUM I, 503 • OPP OPPOSITE ) EXISTING STRUCTURE 503 274 7803 Fax ES EACH SIDE OS OUTSIDE EW EACH WAY DATE: 04/23/02 EJ EXPANSION JOINT P EL ELEVATION LINE TYPES REVISIONS ELEV ELEVATOR PCS PERSONAL ELEC ELECTRICAL REV.: DATE: DESCRIPTION: BY: ENG ENGINEER COMMUNICATIONS NEW WORK —sS 55 SANITARY SEWER SERVICE EQ EQUAL PPC POWER PROTECTION - DEMOLITION WORK —SO—SO--- STORM SEWER EQUIP EQUIPMENT CABINET EX EXISTING PR PAIR - CENTERLINE —FD ED— FLOOR DRAIN EXT EXTERIOR PRC PRIMARY RADIO CABINET — - PROPERTY / LEASE LINE —RD No- P.S.F. POUNDS PER SQUARE ROOF DRAIN F FOOT n BREAK LINE P.S.I. POUNDS PER SQUARE �V _ FAB FABRICATION INCH ----TOC---- EXISTING CONTOUR —GAS—GAS— GAS 4/23/02 ISSUED FOR DL Q FACT FACTORY PT PRESSURE TREATED ® NEW CONTOUR ZONING FB FLAT BAR FWD PLYWOOD —w—w— WATER ISSUED FOR FD FLOOR DRAIN PWR POWER (CABINET) —Hw—Hw— HOT WATER Qp 3/27/02 ZONING PERMIT TF FON FOUNDATION PWS PIGMENTED WOOD STAIN FE FIRE EXTINGUISHER —0--C----'0----0--C----'0EXISTING CHAIN LINK FENCE —Cw—tw— COLD WATER SITE No FEC FIRE EXTINGUISHER Q =t —T— EXISTING WOOD FENCE PT327-01 CABINET FF FINISH FLOOR OT QUARRY TILE —X—x— CHAIN LINK FENCE —A—A— ANTENNA COAX CABLE FG FINISH GRADE Orr QUANTITY FIN FINISH ---0—0— GROUND FLR FLOOR R —P—P— POWER —GEN—GEN— GENERATOR 15700 SW PACIFIC HY. FLOUR FLUORESCENT WTIGARD,OR F.O.C. FACE OF CONCRETE RAD RADIUS —T--T TELCO —E—E— ELECTRICAL CONDUIT F.O.F. FACE OF FINISH RD ROOF DRAIN —P80—Pd:T— POWER & TELCO 97224 F.O.M. FACE OF MASONRY REINF REINFORCED —C C CONDUIT F.O.S. FACE OF STUD REQ REQUIRED F.O.W. FACE OF WALL RO ROUGH OPENING GENERAL NOTES FP FIRE PROOF — —OHP— — OVERHEAD POWER FT FOOT or FEET LEGEND& FTC FOOTING — —0°T — — OVERHEAD TELCO ABBREVIATIONS URR FURRING — —OH— — OVERHEAD • G2 . 0 02-0 45 / TOPOGRAPHIC SURVEY VICINITY / / / t-F A PORTION OF ASSESSOR'S PARCEL NO. 300 0 SITUATED IN THE S.E. 1/4 OF SECTION 10, uulRDOCK U o /.1.. TOWNSHIP 2 SOUTH, RANGE 1 WEST, W.M., t-i 'I r/ / WASHINGTON COUNTY, OREGON BEND w .N1 N H 40,O / 2 I/I"BRASS CAP MAP LEGAL DESCRIPTION - PARENT PARCEL' sArnER A > 4/ / COOPER CONSULTANTS' BEGINNING AT AN IRON PIPE AT THE NORTHEAST CORNER OF LOT 16, • 3w 1 L.. w O WILLOWBR001( FARM, A SUBOI Y151ON OF RECORD IN SECTION 10, TOWNSHIP 2 q� 4f� a SW KABLE I \ y 0.1 Q O L3j I I I I(S 8951'W 842 a) I `-'� J S 8d'41'35'E SOUTH, RANGE 1 WEST, WILLAMETTE MERIDIAN, WASHINGTON COUNTY, OREGON I J I I I In / blast- -- - - - o AND RUNNING THENCE ALONG THE NORTH LINE OF SAID LOT 16. SOUTH 89'57' 3 �//j��SITE I �L -0 Qz / / WEST AT 910.9 FEET AN IRON ROD, ON THE EASTERLY LINE OF THE WEST SIDE 1n 2 f C f'7 j OF PACIFIC HIGHWAY) A DISTANCE OF 842.80 FEET TO THE NORTHWEST CORNER M/ I I THEREOF; THENCE ALONG THE WESTERLY LINE OF SAID WT 16, SOUTH 1T 52' h 4 W 3 Z O I _ WEST, 259.6 FEET TO A POINT; THENCE PARALLEL TO THE NORTH LINE OF SAID Q SUMMERFIELD� . ^ v a v ,/21/ �' 13 TRUE LOT 16, NORTH 89'51'EAST(AT 79.6 FEET AN IRON ROD ON THE EASTERLY Z N / ^�� 1 In... LINE OF THE HIGHWAY) A DISTANCE of 921.9 FEET TO AN IRON ROD ON THE h • EAST LINE OF SAID LOT 16; THENCE NORTH 0'08'EAST, 246.9 FEET TO THE a, e/ In W POINT OF BEGINNING. EXCEPT THAT PORTION DESCRIBED IN DEED TO STATE OF _ DURHAM ROAD ' / o$ OREGON,BOOK AND 334, PAGE ITS DEED HIGHWAY COMMISSION, RECORDED JULY 3, / I INv T•3T'S7� M 1952 IN BOOK 334, PAGE 335,DEED RECORDS.III ( I AGN£TIC N / / _ 261.76 — — 7 / / N 88"41'35' W _ — —— ---j PROPERTY INFORMATION' / (S 8951'W 921.9) / / Add ess:PO WON 19R56 HOLDINGS INC. 5/8"IRON ROO *O/ s/r LS 808 ALEXANDRIA,VIRGINIA 22]20 0 / / Site: 15700 SW FA Andress:,5700 SW PACIFIC NWv TIGARD,OREGON 97224 / / Assessof's Parcel Number:300 Title Report: I_ SCALE: 1' = 100' ND TITLE REPORT FURNISHED AS OF 03/21/02 V7 - 0 50 100 200 Legal Description: �/ IL o C N m O JO n FEMA FLOOD ZONE DESIGNATION Notional flood M.u.ance p,ag,am: m s County:WASHINGTON Effecter.Dote MARCH 1, 1982 E C C Panel: 4 OF 5 Community-Panel numbs. 410275 0004 m B a' m Tne no.Ions oe.igmoNm rod this site NE= p o C AREAS OF MINIMAL FLOODING m W • CnN A BUILDING o r 2 GEODETIC DATA. HAD/13 Datum _ _ _ CENTER OF POST BETWEEN Lot.45' 24 22.38" Lang.127 47'38.10" UNITS 157 & 158 1. x—X_C x._x WATER TONE MARK _ DEA IBM UPI 2011 GAZLEY PLOWMAN Datum Base: 440 83 Equipment Used:THIMBLE 4800 GPO RECEIVERS ARCHITECTS (Dee Note 1) 2701 NIX'�'aughn Elevation of Surveyed Site Point 203.0*AMSL(NAVE Be) Suite 7yt BUILDING A POonIarNl, 9i270 � Basis of Elevation: GoE01 Positioning System(GPO).(Dee Note 2) i0J 2-47801 Fax Basis of Bearings: OREGON STATE PLANE COORDINATE SYSTEM, DATE: 03/21/02 NORTH ZONE Dote of Field Survey:03/18/02 REVISIONS OCR File: SBAT0000-0079 REV.: DATE: DESCRIPTION: B'Y: NOTES: and) TANS not a boom.surety. This I.ow.P.cioline!topographic mop•Ith property 1s es being o graphic depiction of Taus Rlormetian gathered from pr.lA0Aory« Title report.,D«e-up documents of record,mops ond a.osoble monument.found during In. ANd surrey. No p,eperty monuments were eat. No litre research e.performed by oovid Evan.and A.eoc•tee a 1' 2) The btltude.longitude and.lewtion shorn hereon e.derived horn post-poxes., or-phoee data coIlecl.4 uslng Con tlnuou My Operal'ng Reference 5lotion rOS1(COBS)o the 1T,MnMe 4800 Receiver. TrMbls.pec;ncarms report decimeter MM o r nor PRELIMINARY acy Q 03/21/02 (narieaatany) ...on dot,I.property wn.cad om processed.(Devotion-c:ao) 0 ISSUE BA I n 3) Unln.otherwise nol.d,no underground utility locating. company was contacted BUILDING B a pro to Mir mop bang prepared: tO«aor.Mere may be n< Wsihl.or obscure*10111e. SITE No IUNIT o R s evleting m I0a property not W0 on this mop-CALL BEFORE YOU DIG. PT327-01 58 -I ga -- — - — I UNIT u 57 15700 SW PACIFIC HWY LL'GFRi2 TIGARD,OREGON 97224 cQ A DEA CONTROL/TBM O SHRUB• / ▪ FOUND 5/8"WON ROD TREE - DECIDUOUS UNLESS OTHERWISE NOTED TREE - CEDAR • BOUARD t- UTILOY MANHOLE TOPOGRAPHIC SURVEY CATCH BASIN • WATER VALVE ENLARGED SITE PLAN FIRE HYDRANT LA • CAS METER EDGE OF PAVEMENT SCALE: 1" 20' —X FENCE A • O GUY WIRE ANCHOR l(,w J-_ 0 10 20 40 o POWER POLE AMSI ABOVE MEAN GROUND SEA LEVEL B POWER RISER I ) RECORD DATA • SPRINKLER PER SN 4318 JOB No SBAT0000-0079 • / %I y �z a i • �% ADJ. ZONING EXIST, EXIST, COMMERCIAL BUILDING „I % G- /+ 2 /// ZONE: (C-0) GENERAL PARKING\ �.•/ '', I / O -: =, , COMMERCIAL i _ u^ '''' �2 / /--+ JURISDICTION: CITY OF TIGARD -' r/'j,j I I %+ O / 0 8.. / i� fi , A Q / /i•i r/i./'' i'ii'7 r,�/ i i r��r�Ir%r'i" i r'r r•i,�A r r 'r'r'r, r'�r '/' •i+ " ,r ri%!,/„/,'. r1J.i:i'ir,iiir:i /i,r: 'r,.r/ r ••r//r A wr•� �l] y r ,/ 1 / // EXISTHIGH� / %, 3401'-0' ' ! . _ '7F�' : 7/ ''�' i-/ CONI. TREES. ,:;' /r r,riiirii'iri',,,,,/;ii'/i/„r, '} I i.�J� EXIST. P.P. I. !/;_1 "_ (. - , ., _ _ N'` \(, i_ — _ , 1, \s;• a ./• ` 1 / .-4,— / / - . / .�. 1 , / EXIST. F.H. - L� L� L I / <-1 /I ...-1 L\ 7/ EXIST. LANDSSAPING lYe / . .. . .. ., /r + .. -.,,,,,. . .-'„” . ..,,,•r,!!, ,r•/ ....,,r,,.,.r.' TYP. / EXISTING ONE STORY STORAGE BUILD.'C” ', ' ' / y'1. EXISTING ONE STORY STORAGE BUILD. "D' , - / /' r,4 '• ,r LOT 2Si 100000300 5.001ICRE5 /, , r.. /,r,,,rJ.,•••• ,,/,,„r//,,,,,,r!J,,,,/, ,,,,,r,,. .,• ,r, .. „r,r,. 'r ADJ. ZONING / �/, /,r, r/,,,.'.%"„•,„/,;,,r /,!,/„r,,,r!,,,,r„„ /.',r.,/„/•,,, ,, ZONE: (R) RESIDENTIAL ax r ' JURISDICTION: CITY OF TIGARD N ZO�JING 2 i /' EXISTING ONE STORY STORAGE BUILD” 'B' O PROJECT AREA EXSTING ONE STORY STORAGE BUILD. 'E” 1n ZO4E: (C-G) GENER4 fr • COMMERCIAL / / r ,� N=I A1.1 > , ,XIRISDICTION: / � •- ,,,,,%/.• •jr, ,,,. .i/� r,r, � •/•••• r ,•• r, ul ,r/„r CITY OF TIGARD / !7i ,';,,,,,,../ „•, /,.,,r,,,1. ./,r ,,. .i�,,,.,.,/,,,,,,,,.//„• i.. Zrn 'USE: STORAGE FA7CIUTY / ? .. > 7 � G O PRIMA/tV ACCESS. ..., r , ,. !/ /,/ / • / • „ • / ! „/ !,./ , / ",,,/.” ' r, !./!.,, „/!J.,/,,, ,, r./,/, , .r,,, /,. , �J c,Z / 1• CZ w, p , Z� + • EXISTING ONE STORY STORAGE BUILD.'A' n E7o5TING ONE STORY STORAGE BUILD. "F” `r a f-. 7”• Fr,/,r// , , '// , /, ,• ,/,'j//, • 'ir,/, , /r •, , ,/•, r/, /i , '0'.- / ti EXIST. i '!/„ /„i' /, /, ii•,,,,' ,.,,' , •/ / , ,/, •„ •r../,/ r .,a:•: r OFFICE.a sr:;;•• 1 1x0 DRAWINGS / \ �/ r , ARE 50% REDUCTIONS ,::- �c�RED ��9 raj I', t r'- (--- ( ( rrrr ( ( r ( r �3 r � t r rrjj� rr/ �' rr f' rr rr �yf' r1i�a r rrr •' '"" -.: _ :� , ' r; •, , , ; •J`i'i'i•�`i iiGiGitiiici�4ChGOGi i.' ` �' 'I'. <J.i•.7`X•O'i�S7:IV'Jri•CIGKi/]( Gi/]+aiC�r JJ,�Ja•-.tr�°./VC./i/'�fir4 AV �?SfevBll Y.N.RQMMN/ / /i EXIST. COMMERCIAL ,/ \ '-9 / BUILDING 't-„, l •, EXIST. IB' HIGH CONIF. ,r1/ r I EXISTING ARBORVITAE r/, r HIGH ARBORVITAE EXIST. 45' HIGH tPr�' •� �` / i1,2�%,.,�•X',:./�/,;,i, ,ii,,•i///,'//,'i/r„ r`\DEC. TREES. p L / • I ADJ. ZONING \J GAZLEY ZONE: (R) RESIDENTIAL ��/ /' ARCHITECTS //4-\\ _ "' , JURISDICTION: CITY OF TIGARD 2701 N'W Vaughn %' / ADJ. ZONING 571764 ZONE: (C-C) GENERAL I /'' Suite 76 O.97210 / / EXIST. COMMERCIAL / 507274.7800 / PARKING \ JURISDICTION: CITY OF TIGARD !"- \ 'i i1%// ,i r 501 274 7801 Far / // { ';'/,i'//i. !„,,,/,,',;„'„,„/.„'„„, i, GATE: 04/23/02 //,///r t I ''N',/':','W/r.i ,/,, ;',/,,,;;„'„:;,:;, REVISIONS/ / ,; '',,�/ .`40 / / I ii' ,/'i I ,`'/,,,,, ,/,, /' REV.: DATE: DESCRIPTION: BE '•,,, r,/r',irr'A '/ 1.4:% i .',2;,/:;;;;;;";,',','; iii /' ...,/, ''''..?"?';';''N''':''''' l'•;••:";;;:5:;,,,,!'�/i'' / 2/'' / 1 EXIST. APARTMENTS. � / / / gig FOR 20NING 11" i 3/27/02 ZONING REVIEW OL r.• I ';',7;,;,;,,',;‘,,,,,,,;„,„ Q ISSUED FOR 1 i/ , '',%/, 'i i','i,i/,i,i / 1 4/Z3/02 DL i1 COMMERCIAL .1/•• ',1 ' „ ' ''•/;;;;,11,',;;;'''1::::;;;;;;'•i. 'i i ,�r iii ' •'i/,� �: • I/ SITE No. / BUILDNG ,:, �;, i; ;1; / ''%;', .. l'i,:::,'",'''';;;;,%,:'•:,';'•:,?;,:' � j PT327-01/it „rr�„ .,,' ,r ':%%•rr ,i i,r I , �� / , i1' ., EXIST. !�',i i%r � i: / I , j �r�9 / 15700 SW PACIFIC HWY. ;,' COMMERCIAL i'`%,'' ! / % ' TIGARD,OR //r 'i�. BLIN.OMIC 'r R' ' �� . 97224 /, ,, / / ''.,f /i" EXIST. ':r I % N ti EXIV CIJNITY ARDEA BNS. ''/ %f . COMMERCIAL " / 1.. +„'•. i/- ii", , BUILDING .�,! 1 •/%,'iir / /r/,',i �7�T;'j , SITE DEVELOPMENT //' i ',� ' ,, /' % „ a PLAN OVERALL SITE PLAN SCALE ,•A 1 JOB r- 02-045 i I y, t8.-9. EXIST. EXTERIOR ------;;,y 3•-7- 11' 3' BRICK WALL ,,', --. r T=fig 60- .• 'i/'- -- =y.1. _ , ,.,, ..._..:_.1''..,.!. ,... . `•I EXIST. INTERIOR ❑ JY 1�i e 2X WALL a- S r: 7. 1 o, `'1 U Q ''' I, 1 FUR OUT EXIST. WALL _ t '��_ . J W/2x STUDS AND 5/8• • •'�;I • • .T .� i GYP. EQUIP. SIDE OF / ❑ �` �/ I WALL. 2 I I I d n I SERVK:E2 SERVICE BASE I EXTENSION I EXTENSION (FUTURE) (INITIAL) (INTIAL) (FUTURE) I,1 77 S a a ,%.�;� I I I (FUTURE) 1,',I NOTE: WQr 4'iFIS s'! I I I I ;; MOUNTING HOLES PER 13 CABINET MANUFACTURERS ❑ E N I •14-• •� ', WRITTEN INSTRUCTIONS U Y P. s I I ,, 1 11 E 11 I\ II (;'i iSsr.1 PROPOSED ROUTE OF POWER ANO .;�,� \ II\ \ 11\ II\ II yQg; AS REO.iELCO. PATCH EXIST. A.C. PAVING 4/w \ II \ \ II \ II \ II �;,' CONDUIT TO CABINETS TO ® BE INSTALLED PER • BOLLARD—\\:. \ /%G `\" II `�� \��` �� \\-. �� \\` �� H MANUFACTURERS WRITTEN \\'•► I ', J3 y INSTRUCTIONS. SE ALSO I ELECTRICAL.in EXIST. BOLARDS TYP. O ' , ,,,iJ:;',.'G_<<%:„'.f t:',,:'�?,�i..„,,i',i.',%,•,i%i,,•',,",,,,,,r,,,,,„ ,;,,„„',,,,, J.' i�i� © ��q _ ,',,,,:fiii ., , 1 Y,',',,,,',,z;f: . , ,,,2, ,,,,,,, 411,,1 I , J,!!, C 'iii i i, �i, ti i1 a i/ ,, ,.7 (2) EXIST.". XIST. i I I ROLL-UP DOORS U EXIST. STORAGE [,/ /,, 0 I i BUILDING•E- EQUIPMENT LAYOUT SCALE Q, N h ;; I I - c w IN 11'-6' Z rn p •;� • ��, 2'-3 5/8• 2'-3 5/8• 2'-3 5/8' 2•-3 5/8' 2•-3 5/B. j C EXIST. STORAGE &10'-0• ,, I 5-5 25'-0' .i; — a 0 BUILDING�B" •,' t ! '�% —v O p isms • i..9.a { _ 9 CLEAR '�iii i�'�i M g7�CO!r # 4-O , ''O' OGi Z~ i,/ C7 a ',�r EXIST.EXTERIOR --�,: a 4'-0•MARGATE TYP. (2) PROPOSED BOLLARDS TYP. '';,',..1,c,5' BRICK WALL + L --FUR OUT EXIST. WALL `'S TOP OF FOOTINGS TO BE - „',',,/'';,1, F ____ ____ 9 W/2% STUDS AND 5/B' FLUSH W/EXISTING ASPHALT ,,�'! r 1 r (” 1 GYP. EQUIP. SIDE OF ,/�/ :.',4%;.1 r--- I WALL. >;',:/,,' ' �� ,� I I I I I I. I 11x17 DRAWINGS PROVIDE (4)FLOURESCENT , I ' ,'�' I I I L !, I I I 11 I I ARE 507 REDUCTIONS ,,,,, I I I I I 1;,;;,. , L---J L---J I L---J UTILITY BOARD ” ;;; ''•,' BTS `c�RED �C� LIGHTS ABOVE. A1141:1,1, / �i�� °i SERVICE2 SERVICE BASE EXTENSION 1 EXTENSION NOUKfINC �S � FUR OUT EXIST. �' r-�aa`) �,;'i, �'%� 'n (FUTURE) (INITIAL) (INITAL) (FUTURE) I (FUTURE) BASE WALL W/2%STUDS I I / •I ° ;, !� �� I SiBVBN Y.N.vLq'4Mx AND 5/8' GYP. I I / I i� '. !�� I EXIST. CONCRETE `� i�i I FLOOR PONTIMD,0118GON= - I 0 EQUIP. 510E OF E--4--4..•' I ''', 9 REMOVE INTERIOR I I i I I 6 !�i'/j J L --J L� OoC c, WALL k'--;)ra a �i�ri �,,e ; I �C OF `V —r--r - V-� O -, --. GAZLEY PLOWMAN PROPOSED EQUIP. I ! �,''�� ,,',,. 2 ARCHITECTS 1N(2) UN © ,.•,� t Fr 1 •'�° EQUIPMENT ELEVATION (LOOKING WEST) "`� ; �,;,;Or.91210 • STORAGE UNITS ® ' '' PROPOSED BO'-0• MONOPOLE i�'.,'� Suitt 764 Vaughn 8157 AND NITS K' I I V WITH(2)ANTENNAS PER ,� 1/2'•1'-0' 5031747800 I I i I SECTOR (3) SECTORS TOTAL 1 ''. 503 274 7803 Far• - 2'-E• ANTENNAS TO BE MOUNTED b i�;C +—t TO 5'-0' DAVIT ARMS. ,,� DATE: 04/23/02 �(f; REVISIONS ,. I REV.: DATE: DESCRIPTION: BY: • ..",...1 0 FUR OUT EXIST. WALL EXIST. J EXIST. A.C. W/2X STUDS AND 5/8' BOLLARD PAVED AREA. GYP. EQUIP. SIDE OF TYP. WALL. 4 Qj 4/23/02 ISSUED FOR ZONING Q 3/77/07 ISSUED FR/VIEW ZONING REVIEW D SITE No. BTS • PT327-01 BTS n MOUNTING I a BASE n I ' 15700 SW PACIFIC HWY. CONCRETE TIGARD,OR EQUIPMENT SLAB 97224 N i ir EUIPMENT LEE TION MQIE 1 � ° EQUIPMENT ELEVATIONS VERIFY LOCATION OF I EXISTING UTILITIES „/ BEFORE YOU DIG. A1 . 1 ENLARGED SITE/FLOOR PLAN SCALE 1 EQUIPMENT ELEVATION (LOOKING SOUTH) SCALE 1/4"•,' urer-0" JOB No 02-045 • i / i / '/ / Wry • ,/ / �o 1" $ aaa / / / 0F u- �, Q U ' J��y D i< /, / / � hi:; ei n l / /—----(drg;2rj------ .m,7, o / / — N % q O C '/ • ' Cd E ' l / t EXISTING ASPHALT�PAVEO AREA T / d •V EXISTING ASPHALT PAVED AREA FOR 1 f/ 4 Q // EMERGENCY VEHICLE / y /�%/////! •ACCESS (NOT O NN i I// �// _ _ o FOR 517E AGDES / .:.1 ' i . NOT USED 0 Q SCALE N CD) / , ',1' / ! /, twin 1!2'.1'-0' F- / autaNa C ,) Q1 / / •!' ' A_EXISTING /9 O // / GRASS AREA 0 j n N j 1, /, f��/� , Za, / '• EXISTING#jO• R[] CO ' '{^ OECIOUCAJ ", ,<— / • TREE Z I- iii / V/ /4�.J1 Cl) Zce / • / CE / ,. / VISUAL Q/ �/ ....:-: CLEAREN fI ..// /�Z��//i ¢/ / �.;'+ j 1 ji / i%� 11x17 DRAWINGS I / �� $ ARE 50% REDUCTIONS l l ; //�, r' S��G C''fib H /I EXISTING SITE J / Jo. �I / /77 7 W STBYBI Y.N.PLQM4IN CI CONC. APRON / i ,� %!/�j/i2///// / / t1/PORTUM,OROGOX Z co EXISTING RCM' / / I PA DN CO CRETE // OF WAY 9TH'OF Qi%% p / I % GAZLEY j��/ �� PLOWMAN iii / /,�j EXISTING �� ARCHITECTS / / SIDEWALK SCALE D Y.u.ghn / NOT USED g Portland Or.97210 fV / .11//7//% ,. 12.1'-0' 503 274 7800 0 , NSl1AL � t 503 274 7803 Fu r P POLE ".. „'",/,',-;% EXISTING AREA ' - . //�j BUILDING DATE: 04/23/02 4 / ' ., AREA. ;. /, Ps. / I • �(, y,/,/�0;/,j/��// % REVISIONS CC j / ' ',,f' 'EXISTING •/i%j,/j�/�j`�� i/ p/%�//� REV.: DATE: DESCRIPTION: �: / / ., GRASS AREA / ///i 7;/-,.. /�/ /�� SIGN // ,�/,.�/ //� / ' '' a. dO / ,::'• / EXISTING QO 5/15/02 ISSUED FOR DL SIDEWALK ZONING T SITE No. / / a_ 4 , N ,° $/ �, 15700 SW PACIFIC HWY. i .=-1 TIGARD,OR I /' 1/ a/ 97224 o , d /v / N VISUAL CLEARANCE `° u/ �_� SITE PLAN T i / / A1 .2 ^I VISUAL CLEARANCE SITE PLAN SCALE 1 NOT USED SCALE 4 JOB No 02-045 1/7'0,0" l% i . i . / J f • a. Ar } .. . P` ''••" 4a ,.'� ?,, 'S 4tr rly I r 14 . rwr ./•i14 014 FN'ra• � ;a� 7 4, M .'".41."4' 4 R•I yy. 04 ,p,'" r., !s 9' 1 •. ,. !r , .@- Y lfc • 'i,f ,1i ' k 'k' r"3 Off°:,p '�•i L*4` 11^•t. •/fir #' .:,aA N. •+ t 'i,.. ...,3%,;.1,..- i• '1 i sjl l+s yrdl " ,.1,1,s3' ,wcy,,. ".lc,�kf�l S y -4 y ` l5 .t r °•� ;.;: wy;' 4r �.° � .G' 1jr s+u'k r „ Y l d4 ti' �a1'•w}+� T' t w j •._ • c ., BOX ram mai : • 11,,op a , ''' ' : - 11 - 111111 *to III., ,...„ , , , , ..,... litlIIII 'i' , •''''' " •. „ ••••,s• J ,YM✓• , h l .._ .10.4 a � i id :■y• r tri 5;,-.s •''s.., 1�, ....:... ♦ 1 i• a,t e.: eFr m 7;t5 yt;4 11 r',I..' SRpp 4;'; x1. –1, ' t ka 'f° J" ri + t ' y S -.I"y `t�rii`.Gh x';fa f4 r 'y'''' ''''' ei} .''t:',. 43 !s ''' i A v aS 3... 7+r r w r� � .,4,....,,;,,t,,, : .... F r �y, : 1,C.,4 • ', ti Lu 'z 4}S ` Ylr' , , j e• p rar^4.,'#� #r r ,As4 �1 } l f - _ �l�s.o �: � nib 4•t i' * 4 i , y,. .. `. Akl'n .4 t'S d�3!ii,n r..1-0, n� �1+K•^��r6k •�i* #A��A r .., b i tdti� r + * �4 ?f�`x;' +C� �R �01;.• of y M��t '�t' Ak . Name: P1010029.JPG Dimensions: 2048 x 1536 pixels 1 i , / ( l ' r'-ildROARR :,,o0L'.' [for . 7 , w AA : ivn+�r IS, Dti ,. ;� � r.. IY - ,• ,+' s•'"q* N} tS M 'X"".r^ j - �-—...- ■'..• `x +� ;.w .' -.f _...r,+wrH•.w, r:+` 'w;. >, ,iwl3M.'M°K a 1i rs."1� ,, 4,,,,,,,,,4. 414,150404:44,44, ' i 1 ,u >✓�.t, , ''.5� ✓n � r 1�.'er. _ . .a_1...+.,:. .. __ `:ft..w..iV, Name: P1010030.JPG Dimensions: 2048 x 1536 pixels !Ana O 7i7 O • U4 a Ida tilig �oi gx a�, U zF=�. Cl) (2) ANTENNAS PER SECTOR (3) CI_ OF SALMON ANTENNAS 0 o SECTORS TOTAL ANTENNAS TO J J t (2)ANTENNAS PER SECTOR (3) C.L. OF SALMON ANTENNAS N• ril [I Iii BE MOUNTED TO S'-0" DAVIT SECTORS TOTAL ANTENNAS TO J'U ' ARMS. ARMS. TO S'-0" DAVIT �J r Ic N N O W l+1 E Z rn W� ¢O CU W,- � Z� �a• 11x17 DRAWINGS ARE 50% REDUCTIONS �c�RED �C� V STBVBI II.M.PLOIUMN C'l PROPOSED BO'-0" W C] MONOPOLE PROPOSED 80'-0' [K --8 MONOPOLE tP PORTLAND ORBLON. 0 I •o �q/�OF o%v 0 V GAZLEY PLOWMAN v ARCHITECTS 2701 NW Vaughn Suite 764 Portland.Or.97210 • © PROPOSED BTS CABINETS 301 274 7800 ® 503 274 7803 F. INSIDE STORAGE BLDG. IF DATE: 04!23!02 — BOAROSED orlon REVISIONS REV.: DATE: DESCRIPTION: BY: /r/r�/��iri/err/rr, PROPOSED 4'WIDE /�is/ir / ii q .'i.%/r;�//�ri,r. ,,/��/i��' !/r r EXIST. STORAGE MAN GATE ` /ij4,,,,,4:.:,,,,,, , /�r/,r, ,r,/r / r�.ri/ BUILDING 'E' EXIST. STORAGE• r r r• r ri rr r,rrr .` BUILDING B' /it r�r�r i,' //Sy//r/ r,�r,,i/rr�r,ri ei PROPOSED B•-0'NIGH ,rr if. • ,, /fir. ;_.r�,��r__ �.;__ �i 1;/:: '''',1 q, r . 'ri--r'.• %J STRANDS OF I L_: .t. �� PROPOSED BTS am",,,,I ',/ EXIST. STORAGE f, / EXIST. STORAGE CABINETS INSIDE i,� �,t BARBED WIRE AT TOP.•EXIST. 'C' // 'h% %:� ,EXIST. STORAGE -' T` __1= _�,f_t.:7,;.7-,.. `?� r 4/23/02 ISSUED FOR DL r / BUILDING 'B' STORAGE BLDG. 'B' �r,�i rir�UILDING'A' ! o (2) PROPOSED — _ . r-:.� ZONING • 7,r. c„!,,, -r� BOLLARDS TYP, r'r "-{ - ISSUED FOR �r� Vii, r, / - OQ 3/27/02 ZONING REVIEW DL ,�ri� % 'i ill;;. .r-,t.-i.:..i•' EXIST. A.C. I .1....,.r r- SITE No. i< fir; f. PAVED AREA " PT327-01 15700 SW PACIFIC HWY. TIGARD,OR • 97224 ELEVATIONS A2 . 0 EAST ELEVATION S`"" 1 NORTH ELEVATION SALE l••=g• 2 JOB No. 02-045 6-.1'1 1 U_Q Ce. a = WQ .TS3 Z.E7 1;11 • 0 C.L OF SALMON ANTENNAS n C.L. OF SALMON ANTENNAS 1 .1—E4 a •�`+1 U (2)ANTENNAS PER SECTOR(3) (2)ANTENNAS PER SECTOR O W SECTORS TOTAL ANTENNAS TO SECTORS TOTAL ANTENNAS TO BE MOUNTED TO 5'-0' DAVIT 8E MOUNTED TO 5-O'OANT I- ARMS. - ARMS. O tL 01 N Z� W SIM lz5 ZOrc I-a • 11x17 DRAWINGS ARE 50% REDUCTIONS cl,%tp Me w STNYEN Y.N.PLOWA'''' PROPOSED BO'-O' . '-3 MONOPOLE 'PROPOSED MONOPOLE p • POULI),PZ O qT4' OF pl'b V GAZLEY PLOWMAN • ARCHITECTS 2701 NW Vaughn Suite 764 Portland,Or 97210 503 274 7800 503 274 7803 Fox PROPOSED UTIlIr . BOARD PROPOSED BTS DATE: 04/23/02 © CABINETS INSIDE PROPOSED 6'-D'HIGH ® STORAGE BLDG. IT REVISIONS CHAIN LINK FENCE REV.: DATE: DESCRIPTION: BY: W/3 STRANDS OF BARBED WIRE AT TOP. EXIST. STORAGE EXIST. STORAGE ` (2)PROPOSED EXIST. STORAGE EXIST. STORAGE PROPOSED 6'-0• EXIST.. STORAGE �^- BOLLARDS TIP. BUILDING .C' BUILDING'B' c :': BUILDING E'BUILDING B — OOP os sr "— OR _7 ` N� �i �.Cli"`J L� ___ �� r1 4/23/02 ZONING F DL . "�' --• ._� 1 arr r.a= '"_ (2)PROPOSED © PROPOSED BTS _ '� �- =F �MISS / BOLLARDS TYP. �3C �i Qp 3/27/02 ISSUED FOR DL r �ri J ZONING REVIEW _. CABINETS INSIDE _-., -_::., �. t - ..°.r`s r srria SITE o --� ? ® STORAGE BLDG B' P" s� ._ .^..L. - PAVED AREA. .r "i'�•:'L r - 7"_"1.. d EXIST. A.C. STE N EXISTING ROLL-UP DOORS 15700 SW PACIFIC HWi'. TIGARD,OR 97224 ELEVATIONS A2 . 1 WEST ELEVATION SCALE 1 SOUTH ELEVATION _II,7.r n JOB No. 02-045 • • 20 11,11 o; " Ua l { �A . . PT327-01 '' •\ \\ ! f is ) e ; •\\�•.''! =� �/ 15700 SW PACIFIC HWY. c;' ARC TIGARD, OR 97224 . `�ENM.N,PL11MAg y Salmon PCS ''G '" '� r� t^znAr9a.o1 =H •.Ct O"4a i'r L,. OF� - Rz's y Fa THIS PROJECT R TO INSTALL A LI PERSONAL COMMONCATWS SYSTEM I ALL +MD MATERIALS SHOAL SE PERFORMED AND NS0MJ.CO PT I VIM DESCRIPTOR RE')' (K^)Cif MNCN R4L IANRIR 0ENO 10 10 RADIO 5�Ow45 45 P..ii LOPTEO I F NAM M CURRENT G RUTS Of TIC FOLLOWING COPES AS Of DEINK KS MCIMWe FOR SALOON 705.u[ IS TO 90�CONSTRUEDDTTD IT WOO 001 CONFOsMING TO THESEs000ED 01.0 mir SOW ARE150%REDUCTIONS TIE OWN CDw0NEN119 ARC I.OREGON STole STRUCTURAL SPECIALTY COD[ 1995 02.0 OERCRIL NOTES.ace.•Aes7(0501 NS 1 (6)ANTENNAS WANTED DNA NEW MONOPOLE•sO.-D-C - - `SWsi.,- �e jg� (3)EOUPMEM CABINErs ARE PuCFD NSOE Am ExISTNL STORAGE fACBM, 2.MHIL/�OOO T LIFE SAfEh CODE v•••-nn-1990 ADJACENT TO THE NEW MONOPOLE. 3 NA10NLL ELECTRIC CODE 1990 C1.0 T0POG12PNC SIAM, 0 5130 N.ROW�j , lit PROJECT DESCRIPTION — CODE COMPLIANCE y?,I'or H° A1.0 £05TWG L'DIIOITIOMS.SCOTT WA•SRC DEMOPMEM PLAN I APPLICANT/LESSEE: f ARCHITECT: PRIMARY A1.1 °.+I�sot^AN•row.atom. r •SWOON PCS.LAC GAMEY PLOWNA0 AKI4EC15 . ARCHHITEECTS I]NC 370 302540.SLATE 240 2701 NM VA1 011.SURE 764 CONTACT: .. E15VAT4N5 4R PORTIAND,OR 97232 PORTLAND.DR 971,9 MERCDM 1 s'H'O+RI iw Way. PH4NC (503)700-4253 COACT: DEAN 14001E 259)7 SW WNON CRIES RD.SR E A2.1 ELENA... lx ..MO SITE^. ^.:"` MI M> T7 eD•237 �.E ELE.r,h NBTOT.07 Es PUDIC: (503)303-3000 DATE: 04023/02 D'0 EAC (503)03-3001 5. ° R PROPERTY INFORMATION: SURVEYOR: ZONING: REVISIONS OWNER 501,55050 STORAGE CENTERS INC. VA I00.. MCRC011 REV.: 001E DESCRIPTION: T: 2924 0079(1,AVE. PN77 S9(291102 MO RD..STE 5 AOORESS. 5700 SW P002%01YrW. pRrlANO OR 51301 WILSOMMLE.01 97010 TI.A0.00 97224 CONTACT: (0AV0 BOMAN CONTACT: (2(O f)O)LNN[7 - CONTACT IOW MEER/PAWNOR SHAFER FAN:NE (503)223-2701 rio• : (03)01-OO1 PHONE: 200-952-0000/03-301-5551 AREA OF C05TRULTON• APPROXIMATELY 200 SO,R. CURRENT 207040 C-C(0(005.CDNNERC2Y) /S i/23/02 ISSUED FOR a VICINITY MAP . 20NINO AP5(0701 N 2. �__ `®]/27/02 LONR D NMEW A90. SfTE No. ACA.RCOUIREMEMS: 0403014 5 UNMANNED AN0 NOT FOR PT327-01 HOMAN 1001 7(00. NANOCAPPED .—� ACCESS NOT REOURED. . FROM DOWNTOWN PORTLAND.1414E 1-5 SOUTH TO EXIT 294 FOR TCNRD/IIE0M4. CONSTRUCTION 15700 SW PACIFIC HWY. EXIT 1-5 TO HARBOR BLVD.AND FOLLOW BARBUR BLVD.SOI50 TOWARDS TWO FOR TH;ARD.(Nt 3.75 ALES.04504 BLVD.BECOMES Sw PACIFIC NW1'.00UROARD STORAGE 5 ON THE MANAGER: EM AND MAY BE ACCESSED ONLY FROM THE NORTH 90000 LANES OF PACMIC HWY. 97224 U-TURN I5 PERMITTED Ai DURHAM Ron 11 HIE]RIO 'NUR[614 CoNTACO,M,97211 N PTONC:; NSOS 201-21 PHONE: (903)731-2990 TITLE SHEET AY: (303)739-9199 DRIVING DIRECTIONS P ROJECT SUMMARY PROJECT TEAM SHEET INDEX _ _ _ .0 02-045 GENERAL NOTES ABBREVIATIONS [ LEGEND 2a 1.:-;i as I Z �£ E.P I. CONTRACTOR SNAIL KM.ALL 000(05IONS MO COMMONS ON vrE. SYMBOLS G S SYMBOLS O 2. CONTRACTOR IS NOT TO OBTAIN 00(051005 TMOUCN MfASUREUENT OF THESE SCALED DRAWINGS. USE 4 ANGLE GA GAUGE 590 SUPPLIED BY OWNER 1 Q ONLY THE DIMENSIONS INDICATED ON THESE 011000400. 5000010 AOOTONAL DIMENSIONS RE RE0URE0, • ♦ GALV GALVANIZED SC SOLO CORE L—J CONTACT THE ARCHITECT FOR CLARIFICATION • AMMETER or ROUND GB GYPSUM BOARD SCHEO SCHEDULE ML NR crum. ROOM HAW RCA.WarE ! ERPENOICUWi CON GYPSUM BOARD SECT SECTION p REFERENCE (.� RCOY NUMBER NR A 3. BEFORE ORDERINC ANY 141[1141 01 DOING ANY 0001.THE CONTRACTOR SHALL VERIFY M THE POLO ALL I POUND or HUMBER (TYPE �� SHG SHFAMING SHEET NP. IJ.d�� DIMENSIONS MO ELMATONS ONION ARE REWIRED FOR CONNECTIONS T0.OR WALL...ENSTIN0 PER or OVER CFI GROUIR0 LT CIRCLET SANT SHEET _-O n�CM STRUCTURES.AR0 FOR Y001FCATONS*MCC EXISTING STRUCTURE.ONO SMALL SE RESPONSIBLE FOR THE 1 TER LNE wiTERRUPTCR 5( SWAMI MARKER E CORRECTNESS OF Tit SAME. E PLATE GAB GLUE 1...700 BEAN SPEC SPECWK'ATONS - BLRLOING K hill GRNO `RHINO SO SO ARE .01'.- 0 SECTION ppp,0' nN05N 'kill A. WORK PERFORMED ANO MATERLLLS INSTALLED SHALL RE IN STRICT ACCORDANCE MTH ALL WITH ALL A APS SYSTEM BAL PORTIONING SS STANDARD STEEL «` SPOT GRADE �U aj CODES.REGUUTONS.AND OR10NANCE0 CONTRACTOR SHILL 001 ALL NOTICES 0110 COOLY WITH 00 AB ANCHOR BOLT CND GRADE STL STEEL LAWS,ONCN.NCES,RULES,REGULATORS MO LAW.ORDERS OF 0M PUBLIC KETHORT'SEANNG ON ME AC NR CONORONNG GYP GYPSUM STRICT STRUCTURAL PERFORMANCE OF ME RORK. waN -— wALl SECTION 000'0' E2T'' I .i ACCA A TENNA CABLE SUSP SUSPENDED .®. �l SPOT GRID" 5 ME CONTRACTOR SHALL BE SOLELY RESPONSIBLE FOR ALL CONSTRUCTION MEMOS.METHODS TECIRROUES, COVER ACOUSTICAL LY H DOOR SEQUENCES AR0 PROCEDURES M0 FOR COORDINATING ALL PORTIO55 AC TOE WORK LNOER THE CONTRACT. CUT 005E TILE IHI POSE RIB T ® NWBER AD AREA DRAIN HC HOLLCAN CORE T TY d EXTERIOR 6 PRONOE AGEOUATE PHYSICAL SOWER ARCMTECTUML SMUCTURN-W.A..PRO ELECTRICAL AOJ ADJUSTABLE HOR KAOER TEMP TEMPORARY .®. ELEVATION 11 SYSTEMS. 051110 HYSCAL DIMENSIONS OF EQUIPMENT WITn AVAILABLE SPACE ANO ACCESS ROUTES A0.F. OK FINISH COO R 000, IWLDW000 T W G TONGUE MAO GROOVE . TONOOw VER, THROUGH CONCEAL",SPACES. ABOK FINISH DE MOWR HARDWARE TN THICK R� 1WE 1 DETAILS 40 INTENDED TO SHOW END RESULT OF DES. MINOR MOOAKATIONS Y BE REOURED TD AGGR AGGREGATE Hui HOL O THRESH.05 THRESHOLD — SUIT JOB LEON IONS OR C°NOHONS.AND SUCH MOOFKLATONS SHALL BE INCLUDED AS PART OF THE ALUM ALL u�0UN0 LEVEL HOLLOW DARN. TOG. TOP OF iENRA 0—_ GROG MIN[ p1 Np HON12 HORIZONTAL TOG. Of CONCRETE NOTE WORK. AM ANTENNO HR HOUR T.O.F. TOP Or FOuNDAION APRON APpPROxONATE T.O.P. F LATE O WALL B. THE CONRACTOR SHALL MAKE NECESSARY PRONSONS TO PROTECT CNSTWG IuPROVEMENTS MID ADJACENT ARCH CHI ECTURAL I f PR.WETS CONSTRUCTOR AND UPON COUPLET00N Of WORK, EPNR ANT DAMAGE HAT OCCURRED OURWO ASPH ASPHALT T.O.S. t Of TCEL ---- HITCH L. CONSTRUCTION TO ME SAMFACTON Of THE PROJECT MANAGER_ AG E RARE SC INSTALLED M T.O.W. TOP OF WALL O [LEE uE1r GAUGE CpROrtRKTORi M ttPCAL PRONDE A PORTABLE PRE CIOWGUISHER TOT A RATING OF NOT LESS TNW 3-A On 3-AIOBC WHIN 75 DO MONIED BY CANNER 0594 PoI01 Cl)B FEET TRAVEL OSTAHCE TO ALL PORT00N5 OF THE PROJECT AREA CUR.CONSTRUCTION. B COB CD COPPER U -• GROUND BUS Q RMSON 50 BOTIMO 0 x000£C.V. UO UNGER GAOUNO SLOG NODS .(� NCH(ES) IA. U0000TOOCRS RA w BIT.BLDG BOLO. NM I SUUTION LABORATORY 4�D uh��bN 13. W R. BLOCK M NTEROR 1410 UNLESS OTKNwTSC Ai BUNG ROCK. NOTED v 90.C. BOTTOMTl OP CURB J V C a ROT EASE RMI5CENER K .IOIrNT VEx 00HOER ///OFFPLLE 04¢ SISTER 0100 BARE TINNED VERT VERTICAL EQUIPMENT E 0O COPPER RARE API KICK PLATE J.. VERTU N nELO - B/U BACK UP CARNET L w C� NEw ANTENA BIB n C )) �•�� PRE HrowAT SSW i g w000(I) LAG ROSE 'AO WTM N CEO CENEM La NNE.FEET 4/0 ARMOR IZI LOUT 51010000 -i CF COLUMN FACE L LONUMN0WAL) WATERPROOF CP CAST M PLACE LT LIGHT WI WEIGHT 0. UTILTM1 POLE • CJ CONTROL JOINT 09000 WOVEN TORE MESH E-- POLE CUT RARE 17 DRAWINGS cEMMU CLEAR ONCRETE MASONRY 4,MD0 MACHIRC ARC 50% REDUCTIONS MIT mATERL. �n Cd°0LK °CONCRETE YECH MECHANICAL E�A OMWw CONNECTION INC 040UnnTRER MATERIALS NA. CYSjo• COPSE CONSTRUCTOR ME. EMMLWC CSR CONCRETE SLRFACE MIN MANHOLE I ••- - J CONCRETE EARTH U MM B.cm..g CYR CENTTER MLS � MO OHRY OPEASRING ® CMU ® CRAWL ,2 ABIM1A•,OMb CM CWnTER VW MO MOUNTED T Or O 1011 MULLION BRICK ( . ` -'I e O 1/�IAIj+f "�1 A PENNY(NAILS) N 1 117500 00LLB0AR0 INIMIIIIIIMII rt10000 OM DOUBLE OFPT DEPARTMENT N.s(I) NOUBE4COMRACi BAIT MSUUn°N nNSH Woos 1Y DDT..MESER FR PLOWMAN DNA N NNTTSS NOT TO SCALE Rc1D K5UUIION ® WOOD(CONT,) ARCHITECTS °DDRRR DO0O IO 0 1=0".'r. STEEL i�.�i WOOD BLOCKING FMy0M O.F2JP OC ON CENTER RD0400m1 E 00 OUTS OMMRER ® ALUMINUM EXISTING STRLCLUR[ (0 EACH DPP OPPOSITE 551: PX 0429002 (10 OCR SEC DS OUTSIDE REVISIONS CJ EVIAN5100 JOINT P EL ELEVATOR LINE TYPES REV.: MME: DESCRIPTION: TIP: ELEV ELEVATOR PCS PERSONAL ' ELEC ELECTRC. COMMUNICATIONS NEN WORE —IN W— SATRIAM SEWER ENG ENGINEER SERVO[ - - M.O.WORK — STORM SORER E0 EOUAL PPC POWER PROTECTOR EQUIP ...RENT CABINET ----- CENTERLINE ■N• PP— FLOOR ORNN • [VF EXTERIOR CRC PRIMARY RAD10 CABINET -— PROPERTY/LEASE LINE .-No—RB— ROOF ORAN P.S F. POUNDS PER 00UARE -V ORU.K LINE //VV SSUED FOR F POUNDS PER 500.E ----100---- COSTING COMTOUW -000—W- DAS ,A 4/23/02(001000 OL FAH CATION INCH - 54*CONTOUR •—w— 11M105 /V,5/3(/0(SSUE°FOR IF FACT FABRICATION PRESSURE TREATED �Wx6— TVA (TWIN('.PFRMIT T P. El FLAT FLOOP ORNN 7011 POWE° (CABINET) NN—M— WA1ER SITE NP. PTA FP(NDATIONUSH[R 05 PIGMEMC°*000 SINN - n — EXISTING CIRRI LINK PENCE —Or—OP— COLD MATER 0 FM FRE CXTWGUISHER O OUSTING WOOD FENCE PT327-01 CABINET —[ R CIWN LINK FENCE —A—0 NHEMM COAX CABLE R P015H FLOOR 01 QUARRY TILE — fM `00054 GRAM 010 GUANO. —•—• -FLA F100R R POWER GEwONTOR TIGARD ORAOIFIC HWY. FLOUR PLUpRES0EM —f--I— TACO — —B-- ELECTRICAL 000000 97224 COG. FACE Of CONCRETE RAO RAMS F S F.O.F. fact Of P SH RO ROO ORAON -POI—Na- POWER•TELCO CONDUIT •F.O.M. FACE OF M0.5pNRY RENF REINFORCED GENERAL NOTES F.O.S. FACE OF STUD REG RECIPREO F.0.* FACE OF WALL RO ROACH OPEN. ---R.—- OKRHGO PowER LEGEND& FR TAE PROOF R FOOT Pr FEET MR..TCLCO ABBREVIATIONS FTC FOOTMO --OP—- OVERHEAD iLNRR FURRING G2.0 • JOB Na 02-005 • / / TOPOGRAPHIC SURVEY PL=":Y'P• / / .F A PORTION OF ASSESSOR'S PARCEL NO.300 S V O / SITUATED IN THE S.E.AN 1 SECTION M..10. .�® hCH a TOWNSHIP 2 SOUTH.RANGE 1 WEST,W.M., r/ / WASHINGTON COUNTY, OREGON Mt 'O'P., /U I 212•2112 ll /0 52 0: // 'mnYp 60a91A,AR19' MAP I,•./D eLR Ptl -P P . �R ` .52 9EPNNI.AT AN IRON PPE AT ME Nd1TNEAST CORNER Of LOT IS, 3 RKLONBROOR FARM,A AROINSION DF RECORD N SECTION TO TONNSRP 1 UT["/ 1—__._ I I q�YIZ!'Sq SOUTH,RANGE I.EST,P6LANETTE MERIDIAN....TON COUNTY,OREGON L 2 / ANO RUNNING(•7 91 MFEET ALONG M[NORM DIE E S SAO LOT Of WIC N 99.51' / / / —-- r WEST(AT 9109 FEET AN ROR ROD,W THE EAS1ERlY LINE OR 11S REST AOE / sITE . M s Z O /�,'L ) Is- REST,259.9 FEET TO A PUNT;MACE PARALLEL SAID ME Nd.S WN K SAO .. -- F /� N // // LOT 16 NOUN 99'51'EMT(Ax 19.5 IEET AN*ON ROD ON 11(EA$IEALY t/ = TRUE UPI K MC nONwAVJ A DISTANCE DF 9179 FEET TO AN MM ROD ON ME . JI� EAST LINE Of SAID LOT 19;THENCE RCM D'OR EAST,3.9.9 FEET TO ME 1::1P ��PdNt OR BEtlMING. EEPT NAT POAMN DESCMED N DEED TD STA)E OR F emus 29A9 / / / ORM*9Y ANO WO.,R5 STAIT HIdIwAY COMMISSION,RECDA3ED ARV},ill I I E57•57. N4 1953 IN BOd(J}.,PAGE)]5,DECO RECORDS. / IT / / -—--b— --iris Y'MI'g'W -- --—---_ - M7• PROPERTY INMRYITfOM .R9r.m.q Owner 956.R6•[Rry Ng9NDS N6 �rw « 9T Ow no IOen„7�afa�uunl'n r .D/ ..r M M a6xA 23120 C.RD Ate Annc WY / / bEras.q,10.a0 M[FAN.15]. / / orb `kt,,A�� Asses,er's v .I Number:sm " • SCALE-, _100' ..Tet1TM MWRT NON..Asa CO R lrox !v+ •Lpel Dncrp4en:D 50 W 100 ON O Fx fEY FLOOD LOW'DESIGNATION' re. ....�A.w__ m .511.07" n.N. INA., E <0000.-...1....::10x7.DDR.R e.rue,see N •a • a A D N N APD 9 t DBODFTIC.. CO/rER Of AU. .yy, a Irt —__ —;yqy" Ws ul.150 [+ _ Xs xx.s 1w.133.7 MAC —— 1 TM.a.ma PL • �'n OWMA.A] DFNm Bea.:3,69.1,2_ECAI000.M Use9:LNMR� • ARCHITECEE [ •wY,;',7` M •NMOMSA EMrotbn e!Surveyed SM.a einl:oi»03 (Us ..IX[RAW100 OS x,A TWU Fu I1 Peek of EI,wNen:*am r IM.x s 1.r WS)ES..MM.0 ` 00012 el grimes:00000 57•T[PLC'S 1000.1AT[sysl[. DA,E: 9 03121/02 NORM Id[ Oat.of SAW SA.,.FA/A7 REVISIONS DFA file:SsAT99e0 11 REV.: DATE: DESCRIPTION: 9v: MAUL .... .`.1.^.Ass , .:M:.'""...,M,0000.. ..1.,.....e_.. 1) I (------ SI..INTNLN yew.wi•-•.`w, 472....11.47E117.......7.71,:l—Mr..,. t ,;` /JD w/x1Nx KPuvuwry 9MAON0 9 5d" a.rw.1.•........a._., 7:1:4110.1::::::70 •••ea. SFE No. pli x PT327-01 ° 15700 SW PACIFIC Hwr LEFLLl� TIGARD,OREGON : A ONreol/S. 97211 • TOPOGRAPHIC SURVEY ENLARGED SITE PLAN .000.[.1 9DAlE:1-.�. . . Cl .0 0 10 20 10 s 'V' `'.%Mlinr '.5.0x4 ..I1 JOB Me. 55.70000-0079 • •/' /I ADJ. TONING `MS EEST.CawEROAL RDadNC ;" I CD to L ({; •; /' % • JURISIS CTAS GENERAL f I /11* a- NRISOGTpR:Cm Or 11GRD I y{� /% Der a / Wo }il3 C fT 's 7� ,�eqi �• /, fa01'-0• 'F _ [IAST.SS'IRIGN I ^�!/ .. Cptlr,TREE iiP* FERT.P.P. �I ,Y, ,� rT �•rE��1 I ?�F� OOST.FM. '\/ I :I. I- 4' I I 1 1 4 1 I I I A I I I` '1' I I, I• 4• /. IS I5�ll1' 4 ' EMST. %�co � I!N++� LOT +DOCmsoo •�' ADJ. ZONING V g EONC'.(R)RESIOENML pp((��rE IN © ILRNSO'crloN:cm Dr nwD h Cd4YrR1000 cENERp .. 'rA/// PEA ` O m or MO f USE:STORAGE r NJTT .,. .. ACCESS ,,, „ .... .., 419 IT CS r , CASInO ARIA STORY STORAGE BLAID.•A• EASTWG ONE STORY STORAGE MRLD.Y•!.,.,r r„,..;, r•r.. RA CO) FE ` �' 11 z17 DRAWINGS "�• ARE SDx REDUCTIONS ,11111-.!''.7 / iTr�F !TiTIfGT�TP7i♦JJlr Ue � r ♦ ' a r r r r r r r •i4/ r:;v.',;;,. ,,;r ;;; 'J.� r ':'� UrrJ�i(�lO Iir�IJJ ��lJ3r�l�atOCatifrr !<�� rJ3 5 i '(j} ... / `E1FRR.ARRMIn /V `/ EAST.COMMERCIAL ' re 811.ING �, I EASIWC 1T-O• EXIST t'IIIW ,A ASTLMO.OibIO '/� r ',r(TOOT.;!'IXOI CONE. , '. MOR MRORNTAE \DEC.TRFEL 119,0 / ;r; C. I ,\ / J0A1 70NING LvuEEY / (,; I EORL(R)R[tIIXIOMI ,,/ PLOWMAN \ ADJ ZONING �"CM Or TWO vR NM V.yI.I ARCHITECTS I ` ZONE:(C-0)GENERAL I �S��yI��Ap�.. a ERCNL / SMSII7lD.. MIIS JURISDICTION:Cm Or 11:.10, r �•) / //.4:..:' I / att.REVISIONS %' v ,, rI� r3 , ! /� I REV.: 0.0 0 OCSCINPIgN: er: E ;%, ,4 I %!!/i/;i ; LMST.'MMIYdTL '% .,,.'• / /, / � 4/23/172 ISSUED IOR OL•' I :':; {:::':!i /% Rl S/ST/OI 20NYIG R�flLM O i : :; /' %' PT327-01 � , � •• I /, 15700 SW PACIFIC HWY. , %' TIGARD,OR FRIMp 9771a /" J r• •' I * / (bi EXISTING CONDITIONS, '�• "/';''''';,,,,, /� /• VICINITY AREAd r S i i SITE DEVELOPMENT/ / A1 .0 OVERALL SITE PLAN ""E 1 JOS No. oz-DJs • Ii • EAST.CTERID -7• MICA ALL III I IIlii u rt _^11 NR WT EAST.MALL ///}yy�� O a. y ^ rrr') '.J /1x STUDS AAA VC" IE y r. .T .T. . wiEOUw,5D[v [Er?.>>Y a i. �� i (NAME) (NION) (ARYL) I MOM) 1 ROMA) ^ BOB: IiIIC 11{!q�q!PER•1 1 ■ r c NET MAUrec ERS I °i F ;• •• .1. .1. .1 IWTTEN INSTRUCTIONS �I, �= li I II III II II PROPOSED ROUTE OF POWR Nq . \ III \ II\ 11\ II Q ' w°tF. EPZ= RICO. A Cw EKI$T.A.C.PANID \ It% \ If\ 11 R 11 COHORT ro GeINCn t0 AS RED. II \ 11 II 11 ® BE PdTKIED PER OQIAb I I II II II 11 (01500TURERS:TT: ._ r..,r, r r i.••.r, .,it.r.a e.r.r.r r r,.r r :r' • STNUCTWS.SEE A Tl►. Q `��y _y �2 ELECTNICAI LSO IEXIST.BOLLARDS T r. Q : 1 I ,,,,, 7 ,,,, i$,::::sip...,,,,,,,,,,-.p,c,,,, ,:,:ii!,,' 0 EXIST.STORAGE ROLLtiP DOGIte / ""` ` EQUIPMENT LAYOUT 1= IL IT.■. Oo• T-1 s/B• r-3 sir E'J 5/r r-3 s/e• E'-3 5/ST Y a FRIST,STORAGE f:10'b' I e1—r Tp-0• .r%; �— . WONG Y i CLEAR i • 1 w- • IC�IF.�f7}` EKIST.C CR10R r �NR 00 EXIST.w 1'-0•MARGATE TT, •I `•` + !!t)PROPOSED BOLTAROS iH. BRICK ALL _ _ NA LL taP a FDDnucs D eE % r-- —1¢r-- —I9 cwt%ESDUVSSOE or B RUSH w/ExlS ASPHALT r___� II-___� �.v..vw..�...�......w..rwr ;r, 1 1 I I III WALL 1 1K17 DRAWINGS r I 1 1 jll III ARE 50%REDUCTIONS J III L 1)I PRONG A(0)FLWRESCENT •I N I A, __ • ___ III ___-IA `7� l n BON:. ■. UTILITY BOARD T SEW.,• WAAGE • BASE EVENSON•IlI 4n[RpoR 11 -00001NG `... Or _ H (FUTURE) DNRYL) DNDYKI (NOVI° III (rv:4 11 BAS[ ILMN NR OUT EXIST. ''— �� i 111 II PI WALL /xx SILOS I I / I A III II .`x151.<DNGR['[ ANO NNW.ACK!/e- Of I 1 t 1 1 ICI 1� / Loon JfTR1IILN.OYDSIO 1 1 ) ! t (110 7 ■ w[MOVC INTERN I I I 1 I ,, All •� r_—_-.0,_—, L-I r - N I • ,'"',, [.ALLEY -r--r-_,..r_ N PiAW1AAN ARCHITECTS STORAGE [OOP. A ��•` EQUIPMENT ELEVATION(LOOKING WEST) 3 mI NYr�. N(7)E.T. J ( r- lTORACE UIRTS T 1 f .� I l-`- PNPDSED B0-D•MONOPOLE P: L MT AND else 1 1 NM(2) TEAS PER I?i1r S0327.7.0.1.•S 1 - 1 I r-r SECTOR(S)SECTORS TOTAL TAE ANTENNAS TO BE MOUNTED b ";<' DATE 01/23/02 I TO 1-0-DANT ARMS ( y.T I .;,,; REVISIONS REV, OATC DCSORPnON: Br •r" ('I iIII ARIL OUT CAST.TC/JJ, COST.O� CIOST.AC. I C».[sue sr OE M. po so AREA. HALL Q•nMTR BEM SUM o ®TnTAlE IcNERI a SOE Ne. eT! PT327-01 MWNTNO BASE ^ 15700 D, PACIFIC HVl1'. CONCRETE TIWRD,OR EO ENT 9721 NAB N II ENLARGED SITE PLAN •=11115 EQUIPMENT ELEVATIONS MEL VERIFY LOCATION OF IMRE 0,00 OW. A1 . 1 ENLARGED SITE/FLOOR PLAN 1 EQUIPMENT ELEVATION(LOOKING SOUTH) ,,,: 4 NR. 02-045 • • / / / j Z {r; / / / ' vt / d j / j �a d W.}11 a j a / % 'j I 0 {{/ hi m csi / 414,1„... ' r . piii ' PAVED,AU gYT/ /I 10 • (=MO/SKYEY Q / KD AREA W �„ ENERLENCV KMC / , ACCESS NDT �•i.':'•:'':".'.� S a EW srtc`ACGECS7; / g %; '/'''' NOT USED m„ 2•ai j/ / / j G AREA O V s ' 45T- • %cf 11:1 v s 4- i i %?j 2/ ' ESNC p N j o/ i TREE y'' In 3 / ms, CLEARENCE %' % 1/,;•�• 11,7 DRAWINGS oi ARE 509.REDVCTIDI r ��, /,'/,,% bi1EAw 11 II ROAM n 0- Q1511MG srtE �`0• "%''�/•i:417'1 a y o, / mass w/ / %;%ofd�:, C CGMC.APR. j r /. .,,,. ,,. , Id,MG, / /1--------- o��o 1y EM uv R1GM/ E%nTIMG CGMCRETE •.. ET / / ' �MKD MEA = % /, GAZLEY ui / AVM iro1 rEOwnu /' AACNITE / jj� ,/,,,,n; %/ MWV,A. g � °E I ;r rii4'''''. NOT USED 7 13 -- KU wsEw /r,i COMA PA, ouxUaz , P0941 '" ��„ REVISIONS CLOAKS Q I l ` / ?��? ,''•�r��//, jr j Ii RN, DATE. DESCRIPTOK I- / / / . / „ r ,• ■IMI 8 /' / / ; n� .: . Y SITE No / / j – – – – PT327-01 a i/ 1% Ii a u/ 15700 D, PACIFIC HWY. @C, T7224 OR ell CO 7 i I/, 9712 a l S e l N VISUAL CLEARANCE 8/ /� SITE PUN • / A1 .2 ^I VISUAL CLEARANCE SITE PLAN a 1 NOT USED ,�—`. 4 Ass we 02.045 - ,,• r norior " •-• •.1Siti; ' -40 —4 , •t• 1%.71-x ' ). • . • ',At 11 440 '1...71-14#1111 - — _ _ , - ..„ ,k, VA .‘•• -"''.,. .v...• „4„.141 :4';Nistit44.14.: L440,:r.t.1/41-,., •- - "Pir•';'. , • A ' _ . - -• ' • , - - • ., Y,4„„ - e,;,' Name P1010029 JPG Dimensions 2048 x 1538 pixels • 4..r• : • Iry , • — - _ - ` , • T' ' Ri•J- .1";',...-r"."It,',:tt • •14 ' I• • _ 1". • • • .• • ""'k.• • • ... , -.• Name P1010030 JPG Dimensions. 2048 x 1536 pixels Ws! CZ �E� a ��fF3 OF ,: -: PP' 3 . W-}t!t! o :�eGa C__ 'Li:: LL 1,11 0.,, v/ C� C.L OE SALMON ANTENNAS • (2)ANTENNAS PER SECTOR 0(3) II 1I - 11 D C.L.a SALMON ANTENNAS SECTORS TOTAL ANTENNAS 10 'U sccioRS 00 TO 1v0 SECTOR rod 'lU1 ' N BSNOUNTED TO S'-0'DANT ARMS. BE MOUNTED TO 5'-0'CANT • ARMS. E og co X 11.17 DRAWINGS ARE 50X REDUCTIONS ,, eo.wa \ a .TT•,.R I NORM PROPOSED BO'-0' PROPOSED b0'-0' K -•4 0.E MONOPOLE JIPRM.�Tr V IT ' � I.AZLEY PLOWMAN • ARCHITECTS • f.lM Job PM. e map". )01111 C00 PROPOSED FS CABINETS \ 30327171A3 P. INSIDE STORAGE BLDG.'0' w=F: 01)1]/02 PROPOSED UTILITY REVISIONS BOARD REV.: DATE DESCRIPTION. BY: E05i.STORAGE GAIE EOST STORAGE BJIEdNG C' I SWIM Y PROPOSED S'O.RCM ' SY3 /DETRr0Sa _Lii _ PRdasO ITS ' BARBED RE T TOP. KSUCO FOR EMST.roma ''. .' . BIaeAO[ LS_1-..1 't Qi 4/vNi a [xsT sTaua arns srls[ _ �MMD 'C % DAMS Y BIOMi[■LG Y�,� .1L49:SIO'A' 1 jS _ eaiAaRDS TTYR. _-- �� /A 1/n/0:2SIIED RE DL MOM 7 s _ IONNG RENEW 7it'..ldrr3uU Z' -A.c SITE No•I e =re:4 o . YED AREA : • PT327-01 • 15700 SW PACIFIC HWY. TIGARD,OR 97224 ELEVATIONS A2.0 EAST ELEVATION =; 1 NORTH ELEVATION • • • Lccz i��Ax rrgi D: _: 1- Ua I>_R Wfr I?gii I tt 01 N A C OP SALMON ANTENNAS F—} y_ CT A .lE' (I)ANTENNAS PER SECTOR(l) C.I-0/&UMON WENN S a a SECTORS TOTAL ANTENNAS TO I I I (])ANTENNAS PER SECTOR(]) BE MOUNTED i0 O'DART SECTORS TOTAL ANTENNAS i0 P A us. BE uWN1E0 i0 5-O'OANT ^ N ANUS. i O = CO 11107 DRAWINGS ARE 50%REDUCTIONS C mRW 1■NNrN A PROPSE -0 rROroseo 00-0' NONOVOOTE OopaPaE 4 ue.RRGOIO 2 2 A...‘LEY PLOWMAN • ARCHfTECTS Rrtlu 1117 0,1210 PROPOSED UTUTT 3O]]74 HO]Id BOARD ppOVOSED BTS PATE: 04123/02 PR07000 s'-D'N: ®s STORAGE BLDG'B' REVISIONS uA ENz REV.: DATE: DESCRIPTION: BY NO S1PANOS GP BARBED WIRE AT LOP. ERST.STORAGE CtIST.STp1AGE I� (2)PpOPOSEO E%ISi.SidNACE EXIST SEg00E p EAST STORAGE // OCT COORSB YN BUBONIC Y' N L BULDING C '`NARNG'A' BURIANG'B' / _ Ar® 5 TOT BUIdNG"C FENCE W/J L" •4Ab , �® I � l0V f1 NM AT .�S"yy L_ _— /ox ISSUED I,OR oL + ©PROPOSED BIS w+.N 1 � k ��yT� BIa PROPO} Lj A/x] EdA Y S.a'` upwns Ns DE - / t?LY.1ClTSE� upon yar. J/n/Ox' ft pEVICW 01 siTE No ""a"`^M" ®sroRACE BLOC B °'.�"',.p I 1 =..r�__J EXISTING ROLL UP . 1 PT327-01 DOORS 15700 5W PACIFIC IAVEY. FIGARO.OR 97224 ELEVATIONS A2.1 WEST ELEVATION = 1 SOUTH ELEVATION 2 JOB No 02.045 Arborist Report APR-23-2002 08:14 FROM:HALSTEADS AR80 CONS 503-048-7627 TO:503274780.3 P. 002/004 HALSTEAD'S I ' ARBORICULTURE Specialists in the caresnd CONSULTANTS preservation of trees" • David Hatstead, Consultant,B.S. Phillip Whitcomb,Consultant r ► P.O.Box 1182•Tualatin,OR 97C62 (503)265.1383 April 20, 2002 • v ATTN.: Mr.Dean Hogue 2701 NW Vaughn Street Portland, OR 97210 PH 503.274.7800 PX 503.274,7803 - Reference: Tree Assessment it Location: 15700 SW Pacific HWY, Tigard, Oregon ` -' Subject: New Construction I have inspected the nine, 9 to 11 inch in diameter at 4.5 feet above ground, 'V Western Red cedar trees located along the 9 west side of the "Hollywood Video" building and 3 foot east of the property line of"Shurgard Storage"facility for the purpose of determining the best way to preserve the trees during the north to south excavation for the power and telco utility lines. After examining the small area between the property line,the building, the size of the trees and the north to south fence, ft is my recommendation that the utility lines be placed within the asphalt drive way(patch and match). The west side of the excavation needs to be approximately property line and/or 8 feet west of the trees at DGL (diameter at ground level). If the aforementioned scenario takes place the trees will not require any therapeutic care. Sincerely, David Halstead BS, CA ASCA I i I I i Email:hac%spiritone corn w'W.spiritone.comi-hac Ocao 006e646 Title Transfer Instrument or Deed / jt 3/ 6/02 5:42PM; -> Mericom Corp. ; Page 18 i }� �f RMER. CUST SERVICE ..., S033033001 20k. J3-06 17:19 #752 P.18/21 1 94020883 l .. +wsehmw nb 110180 + 1 101 • $62- Altar rs.as*i� cetera toy - i)oi tthhirddils►vsnus, 40th !Poor Seattle, Washington 94101-30911 1 b� Attention; Edward 11, Xuhrau, Neg. oo _., 1- WARRANTY DUD I D INCOME PIOOPEKTYte TES, A UAL ESTATE LIMITED IIIII v a Washington itttad partnership, Grantor, con- e HIP, - yB and warrants to BBC PROPERTY �t,DINasaribsd.an EDlil[IS=Tt>t --- rporation, dsintss, the roe/ property d tanned hereto and incorporated herein by this reference, - ,. ether with 411 parsons' property associated therewith, n11 • �Q purtenent sawn nts, if any, all tenant leases and rental :`� grasuantsr fres of encumbrances except am spsrificelly set orth on EG1IEIT d ■ttaahaa hereto And inoorporated herein by is rsfatcenCO. Other property or value teamed part of the • i0 cionetderation for this conveyance. THIS INSTRUMENT WILL NOT ALLOW UBE OF THE PROPERTY DE- Ficus IM THIS INUTRumENT IN VIOUTIOlt OP APPLICABLE LAND USE ' D T�1MB AND REGUIi►TYOli9. BEFORE SIGNING OR ACCEPTING THIS Ili— 1;*- ;+� E}'1'*UNENT, THE PERSON ACQUIRING YEE TITLE TO THE PROPERTY 4•m- BAOVLD CHECK NTTH THE APPROPRIATE CITY OR COUNTY FUMING ..- Ozwarr16ENT TO VERIFY APPROVED V11:s. DATED as of the let lay Oi filch; 1994, s r EHURGARD INCOME PKOPBATTER TO. ':. • 4.+" ., '�� " �usr11NeTON MUSTY A REAL ESTATE LIMITED PARTP'ERSHIP �:.l: a. tA1fAR foram fia+YS' tR rfx gy 6i[LSjtGARD a BsilTNER, EEC., a '?� j e — '9 Washington corporation, General . . . FFA MIO !fin Partner _ w Y k ..r .. a or..�a -rrr ,irn9M El 7.; lipptii s change is rcquadted, sil tax st■teacnta ah it be spelt spelt to the tallowin8 siURCAAD INCORPORATED • 101 Third Avenue. Suite 120eratione Accounting S sew, VA 98101 ATTN: op PAGE' • • oa wMaANTY Cleo 2l2 4 gsw.oraomoi t . - _i. . .y .• • 3/ 6/02 5:43PM; -= Mericom Corp. ; Page 20 ti l i rST AMER. CUST SERVICE 10 5033033001 200,_.013-06 17:20 #752 P.20/21 . . - . . ..... ._. ..... -... ... waew .. . King C)ty/T1,wd l . • . • Ord f /' minim A f M innling at an iron Pips at the tlorthsaat costar of Lot 11, Meli 'GOOK rte, a subdivision N! record !n Motion 14, Township 2 south, !tango 1 that, Nillemett■ Meridian, Washington County, Oregon, and wit niMV eiwne: :iehq the goeth line of maid Lot 11, Month 9i • i $1' We t (at 910.1 feet an iron rod, on the Zseterly lips of the 1 West aide of pacific Slipway) a distance of 942.90 feat to the Northwest corner thereon thence along the Westerly line of said Lot 1i soith 17' 57' Meet, 251.1 feet to a point' thence pareltel ^.a 1 . the North line of said Lot id, worth 9!' 51' rest (at 19.6 feet an iron rod an the Easterly line of the Highway) a distance of 921.9 I feet to an iron rod on the East line of said Lot 161 thence North C. 1 01' Sa t. 244.9 feat to the point of beginning. ZXCZP? that portion 1. Moser!bed in Deed to state of Oregon, by and through its States Rieke* rr Coa+risrion, recorded Only 3. 1952 in nook 324, pegs 235, peed escorde, • r...rr.....-.MN--Mw--rN-.....HMrr.. • al ifI! A G r." • is N. -7 . of • 3 - ::.z:.- :. ___ : --�� ._.... _� . -- __ _ _, .w .-_- . . . _terTS::x:: A�- . . er. •� v ," �• y.�•-�, -- -- ...:%r$' .. mss.«.-- •� - - - - • Neighborhood Meeting Affidavits & Notes Salmon PCS-Shurgard Storage 80' mono-pole Neighborhood Meeting 6pm 4-18-02 Name Address avic et 4. 0e 1sSGS SW •, 1 + .w 1 .. C..alAgyfl,r--2 1 — Std_16, 4_ at...Lb 64-re--,g z 1— Pe-S fAi-ti)4flt-`7 . l ,41-.P r-i-e-s- 1-to gx114-44d vz- % ip- 11 5e0-11.4-- 716 4 -- 80 r meta Ale 1 Qacmo ,cA7-- 7�E- A- s r .6e O - r�-r- fl 1 ruirm r r ei V3e— Alegis J A GPI cli ".€49,194.) III o i e e �` Di ca- PoS'i / il 1\40 A t 6P-- ■ HI S --riE.- 40(04-q 4-- P4ortl 1-144,tit#4--rtfS?. li ! (o O I ' ree___ chwe.qes' rwm. e PK t'Sr-rA4 3 I re. I� 1I �. I ff. 7 ; ffi +3,• I i yi .1 �i 11 a;s PIF i 111 A–>1 CA (f h o r 3er4Oil 1,1 - r� 3 uT uPG- r-+1 14 -12`1 Fl4e ►z--S r 3 c — nA4-11*-r- yv,-0-vWf-trt)-1V■46 &Nor- Rey-4, OR-- 4)-(p Li) cAirt)74 P 141-4) 0 s si2b ePttgko imiaco ADd-jp,4 Gird COQ ((I Sit S fi/GP--14- 12 _ w[.�..:��►.1 A.Art._'- • 1 !.. K 111 sz,(Asc7,--p0A, "trelu-r- 32,—leeeep--1 A79 AO 175-92/0_ Air Alir:Lg_AiLaritt ea' cAlikr (Ay qp-ef 14.v C) Ii CAD r- s e 4a64),- wC �tt Ij 1E ti is 1 } • 5�R. a-00A-C b 7 MERICOMTM C O R P O R A T I O N April 2, 2002 RECEIVED PLANNING RE: Salmon PCS, LLC mono-pole APR 0 5 2002 Dear Interested Party: CITY OF TiGARD Mericom Corporation as a consultant for Salmon PCS, LLC (dba Cingular Wireless) representing the owner of the property located at 15700 SW Pacific Highway, Tigard, Oregon, Washington County Assessor map/lot#2S110DC00300. We are considering proposing a new mono-pole with associated equipment located inside existing storage unit at this location. Prior to applying to the City of Tigard for the necessary permits, there will be an opportunity to discuss the proposal in more detail with the surrounding property owners and residents. You are invited to attend a meeting on: April 18th, 2002 Friends Church of Tigard 15800 SW Hall Blvd, Tigard 6 PM Please note this shall be an informational meeting on preliminary plans. I look forward to discussing the proposal with you. Please contact me with any questions you may have. Sincerely, MERICOM CORPORATION G � Ed Fournier Senior Project Manager 25977 S.W. CANYON CREEK ROAD, SUITE E, WILSONVILLE, OREGON 97070 TELEPHONE: (503) 210-1000 / FAX: (503) 210-1001 AFFIDAVIT OF MAILN..G/POSTING NEIGHBORHOut) MEETING NOTICE IMPORTANT NOTICE: THE APPLICANT IS REQUIRED TO MAIL THE CITY OF TIGARD A COPY OF THE NEIGHBORHOOD MEETING NOTICE THAT PERTAINS TO THIS AFFIDAVIT AT THE SAME TIME PROPERTY OWNERS ARE MAILED NOTICE, TO THE ADDRESS BELOW: City of Tigard Planning Division 13125 SW Hall Boulevard Tigard, OR 97223-8189 IN ADDITION, THE APPLICANT SHALL SUBMIT THIS AFFIDAVIT & COPIES OF ALL NOTICES AT THE TIME OF APPLICATION. MAILING: i, tI t(9 FOv , being duly sworn, depose and say that on the day of M.1Z 20 O`? I caused to have mailed to each of the persons on the attached list,a notice of a meeting to discuss a proposed development at(or near) !E) -jP Je TV oZ I 4A1,3-1 T c( A/1 ,a copy of which notice so mailed is attached hereto and made a part of hereof. I further state that said notices were enclosed in envelopes plainly addressed to said persons and were deposited on the date indicated above in the United States Post Office located at &9 a ‘0,,,,t) etc- with postage prepaid thereon. ' •! ature (In the presence of a Notary Public) POSTING: I, C%(, , do affirm that I am (represent) the party initiating interest in a proposed r1^4..-)Ate-Poll 5.0e. 4e,(Mii^r /geer;t4affecting the land loca at (state the approximate location(s) IF no address(s)and tax lot(s)currently re istered) (5/ " S LA-) -1--(c-v4,(24 and did on the day of L , 20 c.2-1_ personally post notice iridicating that the site may be for a of•-oNto 2vl�e. S.0 application, and the time,date and place of a neighborhood meeting to proposed •>fl PP P 9 9 discuss the proposal. The sign was posted at PIO N•7' e n•f C J Q)2 P (` )4,077-- 14-v1 crec71,u ( (state location you posted notice on property) Signature n the presence of a Notary Public) (THIS SECTION FOR A STATE OF OREGON, NOTARY PUBLIC TO COMPLETE/NOTARIZE) STATE OF (}��-2 ) County of ��t.p�-�.t-e,wtio) ) ss. Subscribed and sworn/affirmed before me on the 5 day of(A01:\12I , 20 0 OFFICIAL SEAL MELINDA WENTZ ((( ) NOV,'tY rt.JBLIC-OREGON )) G(ltvt'`i ..ON N0.3223B9 �� MY COMMISS, ':..`FIDES APR.8,2003 9 OTARY PUBLIC OF OREGON My Commission Expires: Applicant, please complete the information below: , NAME OF PROJECT OR PROPOSED DEVELOPMENT: s I 1 S I • 4-k TYPE OF PROPOSED DEVELOPMENT: t 4-'^A'tO- • Address or General Location of Subject Property: t 2 v-o 1 Subject Property Tax Map(s)and Lot#(s): Z-S--1'-!('L)C'- 6� h:lopinlpaty4►asters1a11Wavit of malkg-posting neighborhood meeting.doc .f O�♦� . 3, CITY of TIGARD ►t 1- GEOGRAPHIC INFORMATION SYSTEM S0 ,• vG �_.' AREA NOTIFIED 41 ## 11.‘ .--..,1 „,.� , � 4 4.' :.� (5001 110 . 4....1:: Q a Q1 p sT FOR: Ed Fournier Le- al •' .�t,� o o RE: 2S1 I ODC, 300 SPII = o o ii� S1w, �-�� ° o (15700 SW Pacific) All** ' •Y 1�r °o °o °o 74,4 ^"` Property owner information 1:11411F111P ' �;:±uu *..Mi oOK is valid for 3 months from ' swoon - I Al.q11 OW'Op 1 the date printed on this map. 01111141# gii ON Aill■ i tip, . swam * 40, • NIP \-\\*„,,,,,,,,\,,,,\‘‘,....,\:,,mx\y‘.\ \I -st...,,,,..*„ ,. ...,..,.. \ __ so ati \\ ,....., ;., : N1/4.\,‘. \‘'"°:\03'2,,,%:*.\\\,.\\‘':, . 7:- — 011.1* _ .. & \'''' NNS\'''' *::::‘' \ '\%'')'.- ' '''''.:'''' '''''''S''''''‘:: ::.\\\'''1/4\fl'S:''''' 'N: N12'''::: '''''''''.- ' , Pill 0111011 App, cy,. an.rrw MINIM ��Q- 4� A �44, N.2 e %.n S• hrq`� ,j� ��* 0/ 0 100 200 300 400 Feet S/. 0 '44 • 1'=326 feet •litiiii 00411111 A • City of Tigard Information on this map is for general location only and « should be verified with the Development Services Division. 13125 SW Hall Blvd • Tigard,OR 97223 (503)639-4171 .r /_. --I I http9/wvw.ci.tigard.orus Community Development Plot date:Apr 1,2002;C:Magic\MAGIC03.APR • 2S 110DC-90072 2S 110 DC-90472 ADAMS BARBARA ARDEN CARSON HAZEL M TR 156.95 SW 114TH CT#7 15522 SW 114TH CT#47 TIGARD,OR 97224 TIGARD,OR 97224 2S1100C-90161 2S110DC-90142 ALLEN JOHN D&JACKIE F CHRISTENSON ROBERT FOX 15605 SW 114TH CT#16 CHRISTENSON SUSAN V TIGARD,OR 97224 15655 SW 114TH CT TIGARD,OR 97224 2S 110CA-01701 2S 110 DC-90042 ATLANTIC RICHFIELD COMPANY CLUTTS CHARLES L AND PS&T TAX DEPT SS#01175-11 JOAN B PO BOX 2485 15695 SW 114TH CT UNIT 4 LOS ANGELES,CA 90051 TIGARD,OR 97224 2S 110DC-90531 2S 110DC-00700 BELKNAP VIENNA H CONGREGATE CARE ASSET V LTD PTN 15518 SW 114TH CT#53 BY FALCON FINANCIAL TIGARD,OR 97224 PO BOX 12188 SALEM,OR 97309 2S 110C D-00111 S 110DC-00600 BOBOSKY JUDEEN CO REGA CARE ASSET V LTD PTN BY FIRST AMERICAN REAL ESTATE TAX S BY FAL.. FINANCIAL COMMERCIAL TAX PO :4X 12 :8 8435 N STEMMONS FREEWAY •LEM,OR 9 309 DALLAS,TX 75247 2S1 10 DC-90191 2S1 10 D C-90271 BOLLINGER JESSIE LEE DAHL STANLEY F&THELMA J 15605 SE 114TH CT#19 15525 SW 114TH CT#27 TIGARD,OR 97224 TIGARD,OR 97224 2S 110DC-90292 2S 110 DC-90111 BORK BRUCE A&MARGARET A DOMGORGEN IRMGARD& 15525 SW 14TH CT#29 WALTER ROSIE TIGARD,OR 97224 15655 SW 114TH CT#11 TIGARD,OR 97224 2S 110 DC-90021 2S 110DC-90182 BOYLES HELEN A TRUSTEE DOMREIS LIONEL A W TRUSTEE 15695 SW 114TH CT#2 15605 SW 114TH CT#18 TIGARD,OR 97224 TIGARD,OR 97224 2S 110DC-90262 Si 10 DC-900 BURNETT RALPH A&NANCY A F T S AT SUMMERFIELD CONDO P 15565 SW 114TH CT#26 OW OF UNITS TIGARD,OR 97224 0 2S110DC-90311 1100B-900'• CALLANTINE JEANNE M TR& FO b T• (S AT SUMMERFIELD CONDO P CALLANTINE DANIEL W TR OW ' • ! UNITS 15525 SW 114TH CT#31 , TIGARD,OR 97223 2S 110DC-90482 2S 110CD-07800 FREDRICKS MARY JANE TRUSTEE KAADY CHARLES 15522 SW 114TH CT#48 7400 SW BARBUR BLVD TIGARD,OR 97224 PORTLAND,OR 97219 2S 110DB-90381 S 110CD-07 FROST LENA D K•∎•BY ' ARLES 15485 SW 114TH CT UNIT 38 740! 1 BARBUR BLVD TIGARD,OR 97223 '•RTLA : OR 97219 2S 110DC-90461 2S 110DB-90371 HALL JOYCE IRENE TRUST KINCAID JUANITA BY HALL JOYCE I & 9850 SW HAWTHORNE LANE JACOBS THOMAS C TRUSTEES PORTLAND,OR 97225 15522 SW 114TH CT TIGARD,OR 97224 2S 110DC-90231 2S 110DC-02400 HARNS JAMES R&PATRICIA S LAYTON PROPERTIES LLC 14106 PENNYSTONE DR BY NORRIS&STEVENS INC SUN CITY WEST,AZ 85375 520 SW SIXTH AVE STE 400 PORTLAND,OR 97204 2S1 10D C-90541 2S 110DC-02300 HART MARGERY L& LA ON P PERTIES NO 2 LLC HART STEVEN CRAIG TRUSTEES BY NO IS&STEVENS INC 15518 SW 114TH CT 520 6T VE STE 400 TIGARD,OR 97224 P RTLAND,OR 97204 2S 110D C-90562 2S1 10 DC-90501 HAYMAN BERNIECE I TRUST LDF TRUST 15518 SW 114TH CT#56 BY LONNIE D FOSTER TR TIGARD,OR 97224 6168 ROSEMEADOW LN NE SALEM,OR 97301 2S 110DC-90252 2S 110DC-90102 HOWARD CLARA M LEVIN ESTHER H 15565 SW 114TH CT#25 15655 SW 114TH#10 TIGARD,OR 97224 TIGARD,OR 97224 2S1 10 DC-90552 261 10D C-90032 HOWARD JEWEL M LUKE BERNICE& 15518 SW 114TH CT#55 ALLEN JACKIE F TIGARD,OR 97224 15695 SW 114TH CT UNIT 3 TIGARD,OR 97224 2S1 10DC-9001 1 2S 110DC-00500 HOWELLS JOHN&ELIZABETH ANN LUTON ROBERT C 2027 N FOREST CT c/o KVERNLAND ERIC B CANBY,OR 97013 11445 SW SUMMERFIELD DR TIGARD,OR 97224 2S110DC-90491 2S110DC-90212 HUGHES STANLEY F TRUSTEE MACKEY ROBERT A/MARCIA J TRS 15522 SW 114TH CT 15605 SW 114TH CT#21 TIGARD,OR 97224 TIGARD,OR 97224 2S1 100 C-90091 2S 110DC-90222 MARSHALL MARY RUTH& MILLER PATTY G GEORGE L JR 15605 SW 114TH CT#22 2560 AGATE ST TIGARD,OR 97224 EUGENE,OR 97403 2S110DC-90512 2S1100C-90151 MATTILA ERNEST L NEILS ELDOR S 15522 SW 114TH CT#51 NEILS CAROLYN H TIGARD,OR 97224 10330 W THUNDERBIRD BLVD APT C210 SUN CITY,AZ 85351 2S 110DC-90051 2S 110D C-02100 MAY JOHN&JACQUELINE PORTLAND METRO PARTNERS 15695 SW 114TH CT UNIT 5 BY STERLING DEVELOPMENT CORP TIGARD,OR 97224 LA JOLLA CORPORATE CENTER 3252 HOLIDAY CT STE 225 LA JOLLA,CA 92037 2S1 100 D-00106 2S 11000-90332 MCCANN CAREL V JR RAMSTHEL MABEL J 15685 SW 116TH 15525 SW 114TH CT#33 KING CITY,OR 97224 TIGARD,OR 97223 2S 110DC-90201 2S1 10DC-90522 MCDANIEL JUANITA M& RECKERS CHARLES W AND REX A MARGARET J TRUSTEES 15605 SW 114TH CT 15522 SW 114TH CT#52 TIGARD,OR 97224 TIGARD,OR 97224 2S11000-90342 2S1 10D C-90321 MCDONALD RUTH S TRUSTEE REHDER JEANNE N 15525 SW 114TH CT#34 15525 SW 114TH CT TIGARD,OR 97224 TIGARD,OR 97224 2S1 10 DC-90121 2S 11000-90281 MCLELLAN BEATRICE C ROBBERSON DOUGLAS L& 15655 SW 114TH COURT#12 SUSAN K TIGARD,OR 97224 15525 SW 114TH CT TIGARD,OR 97224 2S 110DB-90362 2S 110DC-90002 MCMULLEN RICHARD D AND ROGERS THOMAS T/LA VERNE GERTRUDE M TRUSTEES 15518 SW 114TH CT#60 15485 SW 114TH CT#36 TIGARD,OR 97224 TIGARD,OR 97224 2S 1100B-90442 2S 110DC-90592 MESSINGER EDWARD J AND ANN B ROTH ROBERT E&MAE L 15483 SW 114TH CT#44 15518 SW 114TH CT#59 TIGARD,OR 97224 TIGARD,OR 97224 2S11000-90451 2S 110DC-90172 METZGER ELNA L TRUSTEE RUDE SHIRLEY M& 15522 SW 114TH CT#45 CASWELL JEANNE M/MERRILL ERIC M& TIGARD,OR 97224 CASWELL TIMOTHY A/CASWELL PAULA 15605 SW 114TH CT#17 TIGARD,OR 97224 2S110DC-90571 2S110DC-90061 RYAN THOMAS E&JOAN M TRUSTEES THOMAS CLEMENTINE C CO-TR& 15518 SW 114TH CT#57 THOMAS HOLLIS E CO-TR& TIGARD,OR 97224 THOMAS CYNTHIA J CO-TR 15695 SW 114TH CT#6 TIGARD,OR 97224 2S 110DB-90392 2S 110DC-02200 SCHENK SOPHIA M TIGARD CENTER LP 15485 SW 114TH CT#39 BY BARCLAY'S REALTY&MNGT CO TIGARD, OR 97224 9777 WILSHIRE BLVD STE 1009 BEVERLY HILLS,CA 90212 2S110DB-90351 2S110DB-90402 SCHROEDER MARJORY E TRUSTEE TILLINGHAST RUTH P TRUSTEE 15485 SW 114TH CT#35 15485 SW 114TH#40 TIGARD, OR 97224 TIGARD,OR 97224 2S1 10D C-00300 2S1 10CD-07600 SSC PROPERTY HOLDINGS INC TOBIAS INVESTMENT CO BY PTA LLC-SHUR#38004 300 SE SPOKANE ST PO BOX 19156 PORTLAND,OR 97202 ALEXANDRIA,VA 22320 2S110DC-90132 110CD-07510 STAYTON BARBARA JANE TO: :S 4VESTMENT CO 15655 SW 114TH CT#13 300 : ••KANE ST TIGARD,OR 97224 PORTLAND,OR 97202 2S1 10D B-90432 2S1 10C D-00105 STURGESS MARGARET I UNITED STATES NATIONAL BANK 15483 SW 114TH CT#43 BY US BANK PROPERTIES TIGARD,OR 97224 2800 EAST LAKE ST MINNEAPOLIS,MN 55406 2S 110 DC-01000 2S 110 DC-90241 SUMMERFIELD ASSOCIATES LLC VETTERLEIN CATHRYN J TRUST BY HSC REAL ESTATE 15565 SW 114TH CT#24 1500 SW FIRST AVE STE 1020 TIGARD,OR 97223 PORTLAND,OR 97201 110DD-00109 2S 110DC-90302 SU ERFI- D ASSOCIATES LLC ZIEGELMAYER FRANCES M TRUSTEE BY HS EAL ESTATE 15525 SW 114TH CT#30 150! W F " T AVE STE 1020 TIGARD,OR 97224 ••RTLAND,OR 97201 2S110DC-90082 TENNENT MELVIN G/JANE B 15695 SW 114TH CT#8 TIGARD,OR 97224 2S110DC-90581 TENTO ELEANOR E 15518 SW 114TH CT#58 TIGARD,OR 97224 Jack Biethan 11023 SW Summerfield Drive, #4 Tigard, OR 97224 Kristen Miller 8940 SW Edgewood Street Tigard, OR 97223 Paul Owen 10335 SW Highland Drive Tigard, OR 97224 Louise Fronville 15760 SW Oak Meadow Lane Tigard, OR 97224 Tim Esav PO Box 230695 Tigard, OR 97281 Nathan and Ann Murdock PO Box 231265 Tigard, OR 97281 Ross Sundberg 16382 SW 104th Avenue Tigard, OR 97224 CT-- ate 716 AI'J (s i z c s ue► p'<f' Y rC6,.44.17)oil_ a CITY OF TIGARD - SOUTH CIT SUBCOMMITTEE (pg. I of I) (i:\curpin\setup\labels\CIT South.doc) UPDATED: January 11, 2002 CITY OF TIOARD Community(Development ShapingA Better Community LAND USE PROPOSAL DESCRIPTION 120 DAYS = 9/17/2002 FILE NOS.: SITE DEVELOPMENT REVIEW (SDR) 2002-00007 Type II Land Use Application ADJUSTMENT (VAR) 2002-00017 Type I Land Use Application FILE TITLE: CINGULAR WIRELESS MONOPOLE TOWER APPLICANT: Salmon PCS, Inc. OWNER: SSC Property Holdings, Inc. 123 NE 3ru Avenue, Suite 240 1155 Bailey Street, #440 Portland, OR 97232 Seattle, WA 98109 PHONE/FAX: 503-303-3012/503-303-3001 206-624-8100 APPLICANT'S Mericom Corporation REP. Attn: Ed Fournier 25977 SW Canyon Creek Road, Suite E Wilsonville, OR 97070 REQUEST: The applicant is proposing to construct an 80-foot wireless monopole tower. The associated accessory equipment will be placed within an existing storage unit. An adjustment has been requested seeking relief from the requirement that the wireless communication facility enclosure be screened by landscaping. LOCATION: 15700 SW Pacific Highway; WCTM 2S110DC, Tax Lot 00300. ZONE: C-G: General Commercial District. The C-G zoning district is designed to accommodate a full range of retail, office and civic uses with a City-wide and even regional trade area; except where non-conforming, residential uses are limited to single-family residences which are located on the same site as a permitted use. A wide range of uses, including but not limited to adult entertainment, automotive equipment repair and storage, mini-warehouses, utilities, heliports, medical centers, major event entertainment, and gasoline stations, are permitted conditionally. APPLICABLE REVIEW Community Development Code Chapters 18.370, 18.390, 18.520, 18.705, 18.730, CRITERIA: 18.745, 18.765, 18.795 and 18.798. CIT AREA: East CIT FACILITATOR: List Available Upon Request DECISION MAKING BODY BELOW: ❑ TYPE I ® TYPE II El TYPE III ❑ TYPE IV DATE COMMENTS WERE SENT: MAY 21, 2002 DATE COMMENTS ARE DUE: JUNE 4, 2002 ❑HEARINGS OFFICER (MON.) DATE OF HEARING: TIME: 7:00 PM ❑PLANNING COMMISSION (MON.) DATE OF HEARING: TIME: 7:00 PM ❑CITY COUNCIL (TUES.) DATE OF HEARING: TIME: 7:30 PM Z STAFF DECISION (TENTATIVE) DATE OF DECISION: JULY 3, 2002 COMPONENTS RELATED TO THE PROJECT AVAILABLE FOR VIEWING IN THE PLANNING DIVISION ® VICINITY MAP ❑ LANDSCAPING PLAN ® IMPACT STUDY ® SITE PLAN ® SITE ELEVATIONS ❑ TRAFFIC IMPACT STUDY Z NARRATIVE ® ARBORIST REPORT Z OTHER: MISCELLANEOUS STAFF CONTACT: Morgan Tracy, Associate Planner (503) 639-4171, Ext. 407 homoo 17\ CITY OF TIGARD OREGON April 30, 2002 Ed Fournier c/o Mericom 25977 SW Canyon Creek Road, Suite E Wilsonville, OR 97070 RE: Completeness Review-Cingular Wireless Facility, Case File No. SDR2002-00007 Dear Mr. Fournier: The City has received your application for Site Development Review (SDR2002-00007) to construct an 80 foot tall wireless telecommunications facility in the Shurguard Storage site. Staff has completed a preliminary review of the submittal materials and has determined that the following additional information is necessary before the application can be deemed complete: 1. The Site Plan shall indicate the vision clearance areas at the primary and secondary access drives as prescribed in TDC Chapter 18.795. Please submit 20 copies of the entire application packet including any necessary revisions or additions as identified above. Once this additional information is submitted, staff will deem the application complete and begin the formal review process. If you have any questions regarding this letter or your application, please don't hesitate to contact me at 639-4171, extension 407. Sincerely, organ racy Associate Planner SDR2002-00007 Land Use File i:\curp1n\morgan\workspace\sdr\sdr2002-00007(cingular)\sdr2002-00007 incomplete.doc 13125 SW Hall Blvd., Tigard, OR 97223 (503)639-4171 TDD (503)684-2772 Lt n9✓far l,Jr h k%/ LAND USE APPLIC/PrION Date: t:1 7- 00DU?-(5./..t.o,r 1�,2.p.0 Date: f/261rr7 Z COMPLETENESS REVIEW COMPLETE INCOMPLETE STANDARD INFORMATION: ❑ Deed/Title/Proof Of Ownership ,r Neighborhood Mtg. Affidavits, Minutes, List Of Attendees �, Impact Study (18.390) I I USA Service Provider Letter El Construction Cost Estimate 7-0 # Sets Of Application Materials/Plans L j Pre-Application Conference Notes 126 Envelopes With Postage (Verify Count) PROJECT STATISTICS: ri Building Footprint Size L % Of Landscaping On Site LJ % Of Building Impervious Surface On Site O Lot Square Footage '26 PLANS DIMENSIONED: &A- lp' Building Footprint [r/ Parking Space Dimensions(Include Accessible&Bike Parking) 0/ Truck Loading Space Where Applicable [f Building Height Ile' Access Approach And Aisle ® Visual Clearance Triangle Shown ADDITIONAL PLANS: LU/ Vicinity Map 0 Architectural Plan [Y Tree Inventory Dr/Existing/ Conditions Plan [� Landscape Plan rJo� nx, 6/41 i g) Q Site Plan Lighting Plan OM- TREE PLAN/MITI ATION PLAN: ❑' r s ❑ (-1 ❑ ADDITIONAL REPORTS: (list any special reports) ❑ n ❑ ❑ fI ❑ RESPONSE TO APPLICABLE CODE SECTIONS: ❑ 18.330(Conditional Use) ❑ 18.620(Tigard Triangle Design Standards) d 18.765(Off-Street Parking/loading Requirements) ❑ 18.340(Directors Interpretation) U 18.630(Washington Square Regional(enter) ❑ 1 8.775(Sensitive lands Review) O 18.350(Planned Development) n 18.705(Access/Egress/Grculauon) E] 18.780(Signs) D 18.360(Site Development Review) U 18.710(Accessory Residential Units) ❑ 18.785(Temporary Use Permits) 1 8.370(variances/Adjustment) - 18.7I 5(Density Computations) ❑ 18.190(Tree Removal) ❑ 18.380(Zoning Map/Text Amendments) I I 1 8.720(Design Compatibility Standards) ❑ 18.795(Visual Clearance Areas) II 18.385(Miscellaneous Permits) ❑ 18.725(Environmental Performance Standards) ❑ 18.797(Water Resources(WR)Overlay District) U 18.390(Decision Making Procedures/Impact Study) ❑ 18.730(Exceptions To Development Standards) Er 18.798(Wireless Communication Facilities) T1 18.410(Lot Line Adjustments) ❑ 1 8.140(Historic Overlay) V 1 8.810(Street&Utility Improvement Standards)- U 18.420(Land Partitions) ❑ 18.742(Home Occupation Permits) ❑ 1 8.430(Subdivisions) ❑ 1 8.745(Landscaping&Screening Standards) 1 J 18.510(Residential Zoning Districts) ❑ 1 8.750(Manufactured/Mobil Home Regulations) 18.520(Commercial Zoning District) ❑ 18.755(Mixed Solid Waste/Recycling Storage) ❑ 18.530(Industrial Zoning Drsmcts) ❑ 18.760(Nonconforming Situations) A I -I - ►. Jim ►r I:\curpin\masterslreviisecNand use application completeness review.dot REVISED: 17-Jan-01 CITY OF TIGARD OREGON May 20, 2002 Ed Fournier c/o Mericom 25977 SW Canyon Creek Road, Suite E Wilsonville, OR 97070 RE: Completeness Review-Cingular Wireless Facility, Case File No. SDR2002-00007 Dear Mr. Fournier: The City has received the information necessary to begin the review of your Site Development Review application (SDR2002-00007). Staff has, therefore, deemed your application submittal as complete and will begin the review process. The estimated time for rendering a decision from the date an application is deemed complete is 5-6 weeks. If you have any questions regarding your application, please don't hesitate to contact me at (503) 639-4171 ext. 407. Sincerely, Morgan Tracy Associate Planner SDR2002-00007 Land Use File i:\curp1n\morgan\workspace\sdr\sdr2002-00007(cingular)\sdr2002-00007 complete.doc 13125 SW Hall Blvd., Tigard, OR 97223 (503) 639-4171 TDD (503) 684-2772 MERICOM' C O R P O R A T I O N May 16, 2002 Mr. Morgan Tracy City of Tigard Community Development Department 13125 SW Hall Blvd. Tigard, OR 97223 RE: SDR2002-00007; Site Development Review and Variance application Dear Mr. Tracy: On behalf of Salmon PCS, I am submitting the following Type II Applications for a Site Development Review and Variance to develop a new mono-pole and place equipment in an existing building located at 15700 SW Pacific Highway. The required clear vision areas have been added to the Site Plans and narrative section of the Applicant's Statement. Please find enclosed the following land use information: 20 Copies of the below listed: • Site Development Review Application form and Variance Application form • Applicant's Statement • Arborist Report • Title Transfer Instrument or Deed • Copy of Pre-application conference meeting notes • Neighborhood Meeting Affidavits & Notes • Site Plans Supplemental submittal items: • 8.5" x 11" Site Plans • Copy of Completeness review letter dated 4-30-02 Please feel free to contact me with any questions you may have. Thank you for your attention to this matter. Sincerely, RECEIV MERICOM CORPORATION CISI ;; RECEIVE �pLAt dwar. F. ourr Senior Project Manager Direct Line: 503/303-3012 � I\21/4 CITY OF TIGARD E-Mail: Ed.Fournier @Mericom.com PLANNING/ENGINEERI , 25977 SW CANYON CREEK ROAD, SUITE E, WILSONVILLE, OREGON 97070, U.S.A. TELEPHONE: (503) 303-3000 / FAx: (503) 303-3001 NiR P O R A T I O N April 25, 2002 Mr. Morgan Tracy City of Tigard Community Development Department 13125 SW Hall Blvd. Tigard, OR 97223 RE: Salmon PCS new mono-pole; Site Development Review and Variance application Dear Mr. Tracy: On behalf of Salmon PCS, I am submitting the following Type II Applications for a Site Development Review and Variance to develop a new mono-pole and place equipment in an existing building located at 15700 SW Pacific Highway. Please find enclosed the following land use information: 3 Copies of the below listed, additional copies supplied upon being deemed complete: • Site Development Review Application form and Variance Application form • Applicant's Statement • Site Plans • Arborist Report • Title Transfer Instrument or Deed • Copy of Pre-application conference meeting notes • Neighborhood Meeting Affidavits & Notes Supplemental submittal items: • 8.5" x 11" Site Plans • CWS Sewer Use information Card — Completed at Application submittal • CWS Service Provider Letter— not required per Pre-app meeting notes • 2 sets of#10 pre addressed & stamped envelopes, per the City generated Owner list • Filing Fee: a check for $800 SDR and $109 Variance are enclosed Please feel free to contact me with any questions you may have. Thank you for your attention to this matter. Sincerely, MERICOM RPORATION rciwar• (Es) el ernier Senior Project Manager Direct Line: 503/303-3012 E-Mail: Ed.Fournier @Mericom.com 25977 SW CANYON CREEK ROAD, SUITE E, WILSONVILLE, OREGON 97070, U.S.A. TELEPHONE: (503) 303-3000 / FAX: (503) 303-3001 saloN DNEflI4MOD lNiOI ,I,VDI'IddV ilild CITY OF TIGARD , r ��,,,, _.,it ten,; ; PRE-AP : CATION CONFERENCE C? � , �� - ice`' ¢ R a..x ShapingA BetterCommuntty (Pre-Application Meeting Notes are .Valid for Six (6) !lY _ NON-RESIDENTIAL _ NC DE 3/26/01. sATTF Kr- APPLICANT: Ed Fovr,rct/ AGENT: Phone:(5•3) 503 -3om Phone: ( ) PROPERTY LOCATION: ADDRESS/GENERAL LOCATION: 15700 sw igtalc,>Ktily TAX MAP(S)/LOT #(S): 2511000 00300 NECESSARY APPLICATIONS: SDRC5,k T l.prhe if-Ri••1cw) c VAR Cv'«rta.►vt- PROPOSAL DESCRIPTION: Co^541n,J' an $O' pwvnopo(C. COMPREHENSIVE PLAN MAP DESIGNATION: Geierµ( ComAlticiei ZONING MAP DESIGNATION: CG- CP Ilan ad dG✓e,lopmem oi/ulu.Y) CITIZEN INVOLVEMENT TEAM (C.I.T.)AREA: 50,./1-11 ZONING DISTRICT DIMENSIONAL REQUIREMENTS (Refer to Code Section it 520 I MINIMUM LOT SIZE: `k sq. ft. Average Min. lot width: 50 ft. Max. building height: Ll5 ft. Setbacks: Front D ft. Side D/20*ft. Rear Zo ft. Corner N/R ft. from street. MAXIMUM SITE COVERAGE: 85 % Minimum landscaped or natural vegetation area: %. le NEIGHBORHOOD MEETING (Refer to the Neighborhood Meeting Handout] THE APPLICANT SHALL NOTIFY ALL PROPERTY OWNERS WITHIN 500 FEET, THE MEMBERS OF ANY LAND USE SUBCOMMITTEE(S), AND THE CITY OF TIGARD PLANNING DIVISION of their proposal. A minimum of two (2) weeks between the mailing date and the meeting date is required. Please review the Land Use Notification handout concerning site posting and the meeting notice. Meeting is to be held prior to submitting your application or the application will not be accepted. * NOTE: In order to also preliminarily address building code standards, a meeting with a Plans Examiner is encouraged prior to submittal of a land use application. fettn " (Ai%AL Cv WO CITY OF TIGARD Pre-Application Conference Notes Page 1 of 9 NON Residential Application/Planning Division Section [ NARRATIVE (Refer to Code Chapter 18.390) The APPLICANT SHALL SUBMIT A NARRATIVE which provides findings based on the applicable approval standards. Failure to provide a narrative or adequately address criteria would be reason to consider an application incomplete and delay review of the proposal. The applicant should review the code for applicable criteria. [J IMPACT STUDY (Refer to Code Sections 18.390.040 and 18.390.050) As a part of the APPLICATION SUBMITTAL REQUIREMENTS, applicants are required to INCLUDE IMPACT STUDY with their submittal package. The impact study shall quantify the effect of the development on public facilities and services. The study shall address, at a minimum, the transportation system, including bikeways, the drainage system, the parks system, the water system, the sewer system and the noise impacts of the development. For each public facility system and type of impact, the study shall propose improvements necessary to meet City standards, and to minimize the impact of the development on the public at large, public facilities systems, and affected private property users. In situations where the Community Development Code requires the dedication of real property interests, the applicant shall either specifically concur with the dedication requirement, or provide evidence which supports the conclusion that the real property dedication requirement is not roughly proportional to the projected impacts of the development. po ACCESS (Refer to Chapters 18.705 and 18.765) Minimum number of accesses: I Minimum access width: itgr "30 . Minimum pavement width: Z y' All driveways and parking areas, except for some fleet storage parking areas, must be paved. Drive-in use queuing areas: N/m ❑ WALKWAY REQUIREMENTS [Refer to Code Section 18.705.030) WALKWAYS SHALL EXTEND FROM THE GROUND FLOOR ENTRANCES OR FROM THE GROUND FLOOR LANDING OF STAIRS, ramps, or elevators of all commercial, institutional, and industrial uses, to the streets which provide the required access and egress. Walkways shall provide convenient connections between buildings in multi-building commercial, institutional, and industrial complexes. /Unless impractical, walkways should be constructed between a new development and neighboring developments. J , [g SPECIAL SETBACKS (Refer to Code Chapter 18.7301 D STREETS: 5(2 feet from the centerline of pa-c- C i t. 7. D LOWER INTENSITY ZONES: feet, along the site's boundary. D FLAG LOT: 10-FOOT SIDE YARD SETBACK. ❑ SPECIAL BUILDING HEIGHT PROVISIONS (Refer to Code Section 18.730.010.BJ BUILDING HEIGHT EXCEPTIONS - Buildings located in a non-residential zone may be built to a height of 75 feet provided that: Y A maximum building floor area to site area ratio (FAR) of 1.5 to 1 will exist; ➢ All actual building setbacks will be at least half(1/2) of the building's height; and Y The structure will not abut a residential zoned district. fk_1 BUFFERING AND SCREENING (Refer to Code Chapter 18.745) In order TO INCREASE PRIVACY AND TO EITHER REDUCE OR ELIMINATE ADVERSE NOISE OR VISUAL IMPACTS between adjacent developments, especially between different land uses, the City requires landscaped buffer areas along certain site perimeters. Required buffer areas are described by the Code in terms of width. Buffer areas must be occupied by a mixture of deciduous and evergreen trees and shrubs and must also achieve a balance between vertical and horizontal plantings. Site obscuring screens or fences may also be required; these are often advisable even if not required by the Code. The required buffer areas may only be occupied by vegetation, fences, utilities, and walkways. Additional information on required buffer area materials and sizes may be found in the Development Code. CITY OF TIGARD Pre-Application Conference Notes Page 2 of 9 NON-Residential Application/Planning Division Section The ESTIMATED REQUIRED BUFFER WIDTHS applicable toyour proposal area are: feet along north boundary. feet along east boundary. "it' feet along south boundary. feet along west boundary. Ill ADDITION, SIGHT OBSCURING SCREENING IS REQUIRED ALONG: ' fl r tint, or"'i co...Atty./44i Co...Att rrw tlsc. cppco✓w( ❑ LANDSCAPING (Refer to Code Chapters 18345,18.165 and 18.7051 STREET TREES ARE REQUIRED FOR ALL DEVELOPMENTS FRONTING ON A PUBLIC OR PRIVATE STREET as well as driveways which are more than 100 feet in length. Street trees must be placed either within the public right-of-way or on private property within six (6) feet of the right-of- way boundary. Street trees must have a minimum caliper of at least two (2) inches when measured four (4) feet above grade. Street trees should be spaced 20 to 40 feet apart depending on the branching width of the proposed tree species at maturity. Further information on regulations affecting street trees may be obtained from the Planning Division. A MINIMUM OF ONE (1) TREE FOR EVERY SEVEN (7) PARKING SPACES MUST BE PLANTED in and around all parking areas in order to provide a vegetative.canopy effect. Landscaped parking areas shall include special design features which effectively screen the parking lot areas from view. These design features may include the use of landscaped berms, decorative walls, and raised planters. ❑ RECYCLING (Refer to Code Chapter 18.7551 Applicant should CONTACT FRANCHISE HAULER FOR REVIEW AND APPROVAL OF SITE SERVICING COMPATIBILITY. Locating a trash/recycling enclosure within a clear vision area such as at the intersection of two (2) driveways within a parking lot is prohibited. Much of Tigard is within Pride Disposal's Service area. Lenny Hing is the contact person and can be reached at (503) 625-6177. V PARKING (Refer to Code Section 18.765.0401 REQUIRED parking for this type of use: 1J•nt, Parking SHOWN on preliminary plan(s): SECONDARY USE REQUIRED parking: Parking SHOWN on preliminary plan(s): NO MORE THAN 50% OF REQUIRED SPACES MAY BE DESIGNATED AND/OR DIMENSIONED AS COMPACT SPACES. PARKING STALLS shall be dimensioned as follows: Y Standard parking space dimensions: 8 feet, 6 inches x 18 feet, 6 inches. Y Compact parking space dimensions: 7 feet, 6 inches x 16 feet, 6 inches. Note: Parking space width includes the width of a stripe that separates the parking space from an adjoining space. Note: A maximum of three (3)feet of the vehicle overhang area in front of a wheel stop or curb can be included as part of required parking space depth. This area cannot be included as landscaping for meeting the minimum percentage requirements. HANDICAPPED PARKING: All parking areas shall PROVIDE APPROPRIATELY LOCATED AND DIMENSIONED DISABLED PERSON PARKING spaces. The minimum number of disabled person parking spaces to be provided, as well as the parking stall dimensions, are mandated by the Americans with Disabilities Act (ADA). A handout is available upon request. A handicapped parking space symbol shall be painted on the parking space surface and an appropriate sign shall be posted. BICYCLE RACKS ARE REQUIRED FOR MULTI-FAMILY, COMMERCIAL AND INDUSTRIAL DEVELOPMENTS. Bicycle racks shall be located in areas protected from automobile traffic and in convenient locations. ❑ LOADING AREA REQUIREMENTS (Refer to Code Section 18.765.0801 Every COMMERCIAL OR INDUSTRIAL BUILDING IN EXCESS OF 10,000 SQUARE FEET shall be provided with a loading space. The space size and location shall be as approved by the City Engineer. CITY OF TIGARD Pre-Application Conference Notes Page 3 of 9 NON Residenbal Application/Planning Division Section BICYCLE RACKS (Refer to Code Section 183651 BICYCLE RACKS are required FOR MULTI-FAMILY, COMMERCIAL AND INDUSTRIAL DEVELOPMENTS. Bicycle racks shall be located in areas protected from automobile traffic and in convenient locations. I SENSITIVE LANDS (Refer to Code Chapter 18.7151 The Code provides REGULATIONS FOR LANDS WHICH ARE POTENTIALLY UNSUITABLE FOR DEVELOPMENT DUE TO AREAS WITHIN THE 100-YEAR FLOODPLAIN, NATURAL DRAINAGEWAYS, WETLAND AREAS, ON SLOPES IN EXCESS OF 25 PERCENT, OR ON UNSTABLE GROUND. Staff will attempt to preliminary identify sensitive lands areas at the pre- application conference based on available information. HOWEVER, the responsibility to precisely identify sensitive land areas, and their boundaries, is the responsibility of the applicant. Areas meeting the definitions of sensitive lands must be clearly indicated on plans submitted with the development application. Chapter 18.775 also provides regulations for the use, protection, or modification of sensitive lands areas. RESIDENTIAL DEVELOPMENT IS PROHIBITED WITHIN FLOODPLAINS. (1 STEEP SLOPES (Refer to Code Section 18.715.080.C1 When STEEP SLOPES exist, prior to issuance of a final order, a geotechnical report must be submitted which addresses the approval standards of the Tigard Community Development Code Section 18.775.080.C. The report shall be based upon field exploration and investigation and shall include specific recommendations for achieving the requirements of Section 18.775.080.C. re CLEANWATER SERVICES ICWSI BUFFER STANDARDS (Refer to R a 0 96-44/USA Regulations-Chapter 3) LAND DEVELOPMENT ADJACENT TO SENSITIVE AREAS shall preserve and maintain or create a VA' vegetated corridor for a buffer wide enough to protect the water quality functioning of the sensitive ,getb`'truk area. 04. to Design Criteria: o► ,h. The VEGETATED CORRIDOR WIDTH is dependent on the sensitive area. The following table identifies the required widths: Nr Pn-5,�,.,,n. P TABLE 3.1 VEGETATED CORRIDOR WIDTHS SOURCE: CWS DESIGN AND CONSTRUCTION STANDARDS MANUAL/RESOL.UTION & ORDER 96-44 SENSITIVE AREA DEFINITION SLOPE ADJACENT WIDTH OF VEGETATED PTO SENSfTNE AREA a , CORRIDOR PER SIDE 5 ♦ Streams with intermittent flow draining: <25% t' 10 to <50 acres 15 feet + >50 to <100 acres 25 feet • Existing or created wetlands <0.5 acre 25 feet • Existing or created wetlands >0.5 acre <25% 50 feet • Rivers, streams, and springs with year-round flow ♦ Streams with intermittent flow draining >100 acres • Natural lakes and ponds • Streams with intermittent flow draining: >25% 10 to <50 acres 30 feet + >50 to <100 acres 50 feet • Existing or created wetlands >25% Variable from 50-200 feet. Measure • Rivers, streams, and springs with year-round flow in 25-foot increments from the starting • Streams with intermittent flow draining >100 acres point to the top of ravine(break in • Natural lakes and ponds <25%slope),add 35 feet past the top of ravine' Starting point for measurement = edge of the defined channel (bankful flow) for streams/rivers, delineated wetland boundary, delineated spring boundary, and/or average high water for lakes or ponds,whichever offers greatest resource protection. Intermittent springs, located a minimum of 15 feet within the river/stream or wetland vegetated corridor,shall not serve as a starting point for measurement. SVegetated corridor averaging or reduction is allowed only when the vegetated corridor is certified to be in a marginal or degraded condition. 6The vegetated corridor extends 35 feet from the top of the ravine and sets the outer boundary of the vegetated corridor. The 35 feet may be reduced to 15 feet,if a stamped geotechnical report confirms slope stability shall be maintained with the reduced setback from the top of ravine. CITY OF TIGARD Pre-Application Conference s . Page 4 of 9 NON Residential Application/Planning Division Section Restrictions in the Vegetate Corridor: NO structures, development, construction activities, gardens, lawns, application of chemicals, dumping of any materials of any kind, or other activities shall be permitted which otherwise detract from the water quality protection provided by the vegetated corridor, except as provided for in the CWS Design and Construction Standards. Location of Vegetated Corridor: IN ANY RESIDENTIAL DEVELOPMENT WHICH CREATES MULTIPLE PARCELS or lots intended for separate ownership, such as a subdivision, the vegetated corridor shall be contained in a separate tract, and shall not be a part of any parcel to be used for the construction of a dwelling unit. CWS Service Provider Letter: PRIOR TO SUBMITTAL of any land use applications, the applicant must obtain a CWS Service Provider Letter which will outline the conditions necessary to comply with the R&O 96-44 sensitive area requirements. If there are no sensitive areas, CWS must still issue a letter stating a CWS Service Provider Letter is not required. (1 SIGNS (Refer to Code Chapter 18.7801 SIGN PERMITS MUST BE OBTAINED PRIOR TO INSTALLATION OF ANY SIGN in the City of Tigard. A "Guidelines for Sign Permits" handout is available upon request. Additional sign area or height beyond Code standards may be permitted if the sign proposal is reviewed as part of a development review application. Alternatively, a Sign Code Exception application may be filed for Director's review. TREE REMOVAL PLAN REQUIREMENTS (Refer to Code Section 18.790.030.0 0,5 A TREE PLAN FOR THE PLANTING, REMOVAL AND PROTECTION OF TREES prepared by a S�vwn certified arborist shall be provided for any lot, parcel or combination of lots or parcels for which a development application for a subdivision, partition, site development review, planned development, 41.5 or conditional use is filed. Protection is preferred over removal where possible. app THE TREE PLAN SHALL INCLUDE the following: ➢ Identification of the location, size and species of all existing trees including trees designated as significant by the City; ➢ Identification of a program to save existing trees or mitigate tree removal over 12 inches in caliper. Mitigation must follow the replacement guidelines of Section 18.790.060.D according to the following standards and shall be exclusive of trees required by other development code provisions for landscaping, streets and parking lots: Retainage of less than 25% of existing trees over 12 inches in caliper requires a mitigation program according to Section 18.150.070.D. of no net loss of trees; �) Retainage of from 25 to 50% of existing trees over 12 inches in caliper requires that two- thirds of the trees to be removed be mitigated according to Section 18.790.060.D.; Retainage of from 50 to 75% of existing trees over 12 inches in caliper requires that 50% of the trees to be removed be mitigated according to Section 18.790.060.D.; Retainage of 75% or greater of existing trees over 12 inches in caliper requires no mitigation; ➢ Identification of all trees which are proposed to be removed; and ➢ A protection program defining standards and methods that will be used by the applicant to protect trees during and after construction. TREES REMOVED WITHIN THE PERIOD OF ONE (1) YEAR PRIOR TO A DEVELOPMENT APPLICATION LISTED ABOVE will be inventoried as part of the tree plan above and will be replaced according to Section 18.790.060.D. GMITIGATION (Refer to Code Section 18.190.060.0 a0A REPLACEMENT OF A TREE shall take place according to the following guidelines: , 5 ➢ A replacement tree shall be a substantially similar species considering site characteristics. wr0(4 µ(so ➢ If a replacement tree of the species of the tree removed or damaged is not reasonably .recy available, the Director may allow replacement with a different species of equivalent natural resource value. CITY OF TIGARD Pre-Application Conference Notes Page 5 of 9 NON-Residenb.il Application/Planning Division Section • If a replacement tree of the size cut is not reasonably avandole on the local market or would not be viable, the Director shall require replacement with more than one tree in accordance with the following formula: + The number of replacement trees required shall be determined by dividing the estimated caliper size of the tree removed or damaged, by the caliper size of the largest reasonably available replacement trees. If this number of trees cannot be viably located on the subject property, the Director may require one (1)or more replacement trees to be planted on other property within the city, either public property or, with the consent of the owner, private property. ➢ The planting of a replacement tree shall take place in a manner reasonably calculated to allow growth to maturity. IN LIEU OF TREE REPLACEMENT under Subsection D of this section, a party may, with the consent of the Director, elect to compensate the City for its costs in performing such tree replacement. ILI CLEAR VISION AREA (Refer to Code Chapter 18.1951 The City requires that CLEAR VISION AREAS BE MAINTAINED BETWEEN THREE (3) AND EIGHT (8) FEET IN HEIGHT at road/driveway, road/railroad, and road/road intersections. The size of the required clear vision area depends upon the abutting street's functional classification and any existing obstructions within the clear vision area. n WATER RESOURCES OVERLAY DISTRICT (Refer to Code Section 18.191.0301 The WATER RESOURCES (WR) OVERLAY DISTRICT implements the policies of the Tigard Comprehensive Plan and is intended to resolve conflicts between development and conservation of significant wetlands, streams and riparian corridors identified in the City of Tigard Local Wetlands Inventory. Specifically, this chapter allows reasonable economic use of property while establishing clear and objective standards to: protect significant wetlands and streams; limit development in designated riparian corridors; maintain and enhance water quality; maximize flood storage capacity; preserve native plant cover; minimize streambank erosion; maintain and enhance fish and wildlife habitats; and conserve scenic, recreational and educational values of water resource areas. Safe Harbor: The WR OVERLAY DISTRICT ALSO MEETS THE REQUIREMENTS OF STATEWIDE PLANNING GOAL 5 (Natural Resources) and the "safe harbor" provisions of the Goal 5 administrative rule (OAR 660, Division 23). These provisions require that "significant" wetlands and riparian corridors be mapped and protected. The Tualatin River, which is also a "fish-bearing stream," has an average annual flow of more than 1000 cfs. Major Streams: Streams which are mapped as "FISH-BEARING STREAMS" by the Oregon Department of Forestry and have an average annual flow less than 1000 cubic feet per second (cfs). ➢ Major streams in Tigard include FANNO CREEK, ASH CREEK (EXCEPT THE NORTH FORK AND OTHER TRIBUTARY CREEKS) AND BALL CREEK. Minor Streams: Streams which are NOT "FISH-BEARING STREAMS" according to Oregon Department of Forestry maps . Minor streams in Tigard include Summer Creek, Derry Dell Creek, Red Rock Creek, North Fork of Ash Creek and certain short tributaries of the Tualatin River. Riparian Setback Area: This AREA IS MEASURED HORIZONTALLY FROM AND PARALLEL TO MAJOR STREAM OR TUALATIN RIVER TOP-OF-BANKS, OR THE EDGE OF AN ASSOCIATED WETLAND, whichever is greater. The riparian setback is the same as the "riparian corridor boundary" in OAR 660-23- 090(1)(d). CITY OF TIGARD Pre-Application Conference Notes Page 6 of 9 NON Residential Application/Planning Division Section ➢ The standard TUALATIN RIVER RIPARIAN SETBACK IS 75 FEET, unless modified in accordance with this chapter. ➢ The MAJOR STREAMS RIPARIAN SETBACK IS 50 FEET, unless modified in accordance with this chapter. ➢ ISOLATED WETLANDS AND MINOR STREAMS (including adjacent wetlands) have no riparian setback; however, a 25-foot "water quality buffer" is required under Cleanwater Services (CWS) standards adopted and administered by the City of Tigard. I I RIPARIAN SETBACK REDUCTIONS [Refer to Code Section 18.197.100) The DIRECTOR MAY APPROVE A SITE-SPECIFIC REDUCTION OF THE TUALATIN RIVER OR ANY MAJOR STREAM RIPARIAN SETBACK BY AS MUCH AS 50% to allow the placement of structures or impervious surfaces otherwise prohibited by this chapter, provided that equal or better protection for identified major stream resources is ensured through streambank restoration and/or enhancement of riparian vegetation in preserved portions of the riparian setback area. Eligibility for Riparian Setback in Disturbed Areas. TO BE ELIGIBLE FOR A RIPARIAN SETBACK REDUCTION, the applicant must demonstrate that the riparian corridor was substantially disturbed at the time this regulation was adopted. This determination must be based on the Vegetation Study required by Section 18.797.100 that demonstrates all of the following: ➢ Native plant species currently cover less than 80% of the on-site riparian corridor area; ➢ The tree canopy currently covers less than 50% of the on-site riparian corridor and healthy trees have not been removed from the on-site riparian setback area for the last five years; ➢ That vegetation was not removed contrary to the provisions of Section 18.797.100 regulating removal of native plant species; • That there will be no infringement into the 100-year floodplain; and ➢ The average slope of the riparian area is not greater than 20%. ❑ ADDITIONAL LOT DIMENSIONAL REQUIREMENTS (Refer to Code Section 18.810.0601 MINIMUM LOT FRONTAGE: 25 feet unless lot is created through the minor land partition process. Lots created as part of a partition must have a minimum of 15 feet of frontage or have a minimum 15-foot wide access easement. The DEPTH OF ALL LOTS SHALL NOT EXCEED 21/2 TIMES THE AVERAGE WIDTH, unless the parcel is less than 1Y2 times the minimum lot size of the applicable zoning district. CODE CHAPTERS 18.330(Conditional Use) 18.620(Tigard Triangle Design Standards) 18.765(Off-Street Parking/Loading Requirements) 18.340(Directors Interpretation) 18.630(Washington Square Regional Center) 18.775(Sensitive Lands Review) 18.350(Planned Development) ✓18.705(Access/Egress/Circulation) 18.780(signs) 18.360(Site Development Review) 18.710(Accessory Residential Units) 18.785(Temporary Use Permits) 18.370(Variances/Adjustments) 18.715(Density Computations) 18.790(Tree Removal) 18.380(Zoning Map/Text Amendments) 18.720(Design Compatibility Standards) 18.795(Visual Clearance Areas) /I 8.385(Miscellaneous Permits) 18.725(Environmental Performance Standards) 18.797(Water Resources(WR)Overlay District) _✓ 18.390(Decision Making Procedures/Impact Study) 18.730(Exceptions To Development Standards) // 18.798(Wireless Communication Facilities) ►/ 18.410(Lot Line Adjustments) 18.740(Historic Overlay) 18.810(Street&Utility Improvement Standards) 18.420(Land Partitions) 18.742(Home Occupation Permits) 18.430(Subdivisions) ✓ . 18.745(Landscaping&Screening Standards) 18.510(Residential Zoning Districts) 18.750(Manufatured/Mobil Home Regulations) ✓18.520(Commercial Zoning Districts) 18.755(Mixed Solid Waste/Recyding Storage) 18.530(Industrial Zoning Districts) 18.760(Nonconforming Situations) CITY OF TIGARD Pre-Application Conference Notes Page 7 of 9 NON-Residential Appkcation/Planning Division Section ADDITIONAL CONCERNS OR COMMENT a: bi t s ?t t L .tAiitt n .. IT CPIannGO1 Cfop/s'utt, O'IG14' � . PD Moo( /'.�vt r7 - SDiC oeity © A vatiavir4 ib la.40156,a96 re-VA tr: ..c4 t✓t -.': ) „It41.1 l% Pr re 4P r,,6//bc'ec /Dr Hte Ct) Alt 11A fsa./ c.MP(s� DAtt 1/i^f �(� Kc�S ✓l 11ri71/f G✓4, rw�'G Al N..r 1X. Sp6uIAc cot►'ir►1f 11404.Mawr /`GVVI/V... /h.I.t f uatovi. 60 prvpox1A -le,o%.✓r r.. k will retvire. re,evto✓u( BF Se.■cn.l Iu-r je Ic. 4t, _4 fru 4 c. > 12" titAwl . .may , pa> 1r �o/Y. l�� drf coat. ✓r a(es' *SPCit l iL rerntS,t.w( l( no/"fac. odlowe6t. - ZIP 4SA "' c. 1 on .s CI141wawr ► . g5✓�r►ew.� vI me..S f•r f Ad vx appro,.a�t• 1 l so- 00v rProvai. Ge4Sttrio&>4o,i Lod esf,. k) + VAR;tSy5x 20% z sIo9 PROCEDURE ✓ Administrative Staff Review. Public hearing before the Land Use Hearings Officer. Public hearing before the Planning Commission. Public hearing before the Planning Commission with the Commission making a recommendation on the proposal to the City Council. An additional public hearing shall be held by the City Council. APPLICATION SUBMITTAL PROCESS All APPLICATIONS MUST BE ACCEPTED BY A PLANNING DIVISION STAFF MEMBER of the Community Development Department at Tigard City Hall offices. PLEASE NOTE: Applications submitted by mail or dropped off at the counter without Planning Division acceptance may be returned. The Planning counter closes at 4:00 PM. Maps submitted with an application shall be folded IN ADVANCE to 8.5 by 11 inches. One (1), 81/2' x 11" map of a proposed project should be submitted for attachment to the staff report or administrative decision. Application with unfolded maps shall not be accepted. The Planning Division and Engineering Department will perform a preliminary review of the application and will determine whether an application is complete within 30 days of the counter submittal. Staff will notify the applicant if additional information or additional copies of the submitted materials are required. CITY OF TIGARD Pre-Application Conference Notes Page 8 of 9 NON-Residential Application/Planning Division Section • The administrative decision or public hearing will typically occur approximately 45 to 60 days after an application is accepted as being complete by the Planning Division. Applications involving difficult or protracted issues or requiring review by other jurisdictions may take additional time to review. Written recommendations from the Planning staff are issued seven (7) days prior to the public hearing. A 10-day public appe I eriod follows II land use decisions. An appeal on this matter would be heard by the Tigard Lrt/It i- 5 of-Actf . A basic flow chart which illustrates the review process is available from thePlanning Division upon request. Land use applications requiring a public hearing must have notice posted on-site by the applicant no less than 10 days prior to the public hearing. This PRE-APPLICATION CONFERENCE AND THE NOTES OF THE CONFERENCE ARE INTENDED TO INFORM the prospective applicant of the primary Community Development Code requirements applicable to the potential development of a particular site and to allow the City staff and prospective applicant to discuss the opportunities and constraints affecting development of the site. BUILDING PERMITS PLANS FOR BUILDING AND OTHER RELATED PERMITS WILL NOT BE ACCEPTED FOR REVIEW UNTIL A LAND USE APPROVAL HAS BEEN ISSUED. Final inspection approvals by the Building Division will not be granted until there is compliance with all conditions of development approval. These pre-application notes do not include comments from the Building Division. For proposed buildings or modifications to existing buildings, it is recommended to contact a Building Division Plans Examiner to determine if there are building code issues that would prevent the structure from being constructed, as proposed. Additionally, with regard to Subdivisions and Minor Land Partitions where any structure to be demolished has system development charge (SDC) credits and the underlying parcel for that structure will be eliminated when the new plat is recorded, the City's policy is to apply those system development credits to the first building permit issued in the development (UNLESS OTHERWISE DIRECTED BY THE DEVELOPER AT THE TIME IN WHICH THE DEMOLITION PERMIT IS OBTAINED). PLEASE NOTE: The conference and notes cannot cover all Code requirements and aspects related to site planning that should apply o the development of your site plan. Failure of the staff to provide information required by the Code shall not constitute a waiver of the applicable standards or requirements. It is recommended that a prospective applicant either obtain and read the Community Development Code or ask any questions of City staff relative to Code requirements prior to submitting an application. AN ADDITIONAL PRE-APPLICATION FEE AND CONFERENCE WILL BE REQUIRED IF AN APPLICATION PERTAINING TO THIS PRE-APPLICATION CONFERENCE IS SUBMITTED AFTER A PERIOD OF MORE THAN SIX (6) MONTHS FOLLOWING THIS CONFERENCE (unless deemed as unnecessary by the Planning Division). PREPARED BY: I l o RG/4/ CITY Of TIGARD PLANNING DIVISION - STAFF PERSON HOLDING PRE-APP. MEETING PHONE: (503) 639-4111 FAX (503) 684-1297 E-MAIL (stars first name)@ci.tigard.or.us TITLE 18(CITY OF TIGARD'S COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT CODE)INTERNET ADDRESS: www.ci.dgard.ar.us H:Ipattylmasters\Pre-App Notes Commercial.doc Updated: 1-Nov-2001 (Engineering section:preapp.eng) CITY OF TIGARD Pre-Application Conference Notes Page 9 of 9 NON-Residential Appi cationh'lanning Div sion Section CITY OF TIGARD LAND USE APPLICATION CHECKLIST Please read this form carefully in conjunction with the notes provided to you at the pre- application conference. This checklist identifies what is required for submittal of a complete land use application. Once an application is deemed complete by Community Development staff, a decision may be issued within 6-8 weeks. If you have additional questions after reviewing all of the information provided to you, please contact the staff &,5f person named below at the City of Tigard Planning Division, (503) 639-4171. Staff: s A flu Date: 3/2S/OZ.. 1. BASIC INFORMATION ALL LAND USE APPLICATIONS REQUIRE THE FOLLOWING: Completed Application Form with property owner's signature or name of agent and letter of authorization Title transfer instrument or grant deed Written summary of proposal Narrative demonstrating compliance with all applicable development standards and approval criteria (as specified in the Pre-Application Conference notes) Two (2) sets of stamped, addressed #10 envelopes for all owners of property within 500 feet of the subject property. Mailing envelopes shall be standard legal-size (#10), addressed with 1" x 4" labels (see envelope submittal requirements). Property owner mailing lists must be prepared by the City for a minimal fee (see request for 500' property owner mailing list form). Documentary evidence of neighborhood meeting (if required) Impact Study per Section 18.390.040.B.2.(e) Copy of the Pre-Application Conference notes - Filing Fee 2. PLANS REQUIRED In addition to the above basic information, each type of land use application will require one or more of the following maps or plans. PLEASE SUBMIT EACH OF THE PLANS CHECKED BELOW WITH YOUR APPLICATION (Section 5 of this checklist provides details on what information to include on each plan): C3 . Vicinity Map 1:1 Preliminary Grading/Erosion Control Plan I2 Existing Conditions Map Er Preliminary Utilities Plan ❑ Subdivision Preliminary Plat Map ❑ Preliminary Storm Drainage Plan ❑ Preliminary Partition/Lot Line Adjustment Plan Tree Preservation/Mitigation PI n 643.-y R,i'by [ y Site Development Plan l- Architectural Drawings ,k .'*s.•1q 44) Landscape Plan ❑ Sign Drawings ❑ Public Improvements/Streets Plan 3. NUMBER OF COPIES REQUIRED The City requires multiple copies of submittal materials. The number of copies required depends on the type of review process. FOR AN APPLICATION SUCH AS YOU ARE PROPOSING THE CITY REQUIRES 2 COPIES OF ALL APPLICATION MATERIALS. sabo., e#1Cy 3 .4/N(4, orav,,.1 sc/b.►,.fhi( /�rvw�n. r y bi sgfL m� .n f GOM p(4e1h5 City of Tigard Land Use Application Checklist Page 1 of 5 4. SPECIAL STUDIES AND REPORTS Because of the nature of your project and/or the site you propose to develop, THE FOLLOWING ADDITIONAL STUDIES WILL BE REQUIRED. These studies must be prepared by certified professionals with experience in the appropriate field: ❑ Local Streets Traffic Study ❑ Wetlands/Stream Corridor Delineation and Report ❑ Habitat Area Evaluation ❑ Geotechnical Report ❑/ Geotechnical Report must address liquefaction poptential and soil bearing capacity ft� Other ft proici, t.✓\ 7Iasi p x►nN jpu ce.,1- A low 7� 5. PREPARING PLANS AND MAPS Plans and maps should be prepared at an engineering scale (1" = 10/20/50/100/200') and include a north arrow, legend and date. The same scale should be used for all your plans. Where possible the City prefers the use of a scale that allows a site plan or subdivision plat to be shown on a single sheet. Architectural drawings may be prepared at an architectural scale. One copy of each plan must be submitted in photo-ready 8'/2 x 11 format. THE FOLLOWING IS A LIST OF REQUIRED INFORMATION FOR EACH TYPE OF PLAN (If the plans you submit do not include all of the information requested because you feel it is not applicable, please indicate this and provide a brief explanation). Vicinity Map Showing the location of the site in relation to: ♦ Adjacent properties ❑ • Surrounding street system including nearby intersections ❑ • Pedestrian ways and bikeways ❑ ♦ Transit stops ❑ • Utility access ❑ Existing Conditions Map Parcel boundaries, dimensions and gross area ❑ Contour lines (2' intervals for 0-10% slopes or 5'for slopes >10%) El Drainage patterns and courses on the site and on adjacent lands ❑ Potential natural hazard areas including: • Floodplain areas ❑ • Areas having a high seasonal water table within 24"of the surface for three or more weeks of the year Cl • Slopes in excess of 25% ❑ • Unstable ground ❑ • Areas with severe soil erosion potential ❑ • Areas having severely weak foundation soils ❑ • Locations of resource areas including: • Wildlife habitat areas identified in the Comprehensive Plan ❑ • Wetlands ❑ Other site features: • Rock outcroppings ❑ • Trees with >_6"caliper measured 4'from ground level ❑ Location and type of noise sources ❑ Locations of existing structures and their uses ❑ Locations of existing utilities and easements . ❑ Locations of existing dedicated right-of-ways ❑ City of Tigard Land Use Application Checklist Page 2 of 5 Subdivision Preliminary Plat Map The proposed name of the subdivision ❑ Vicinity map showing property's relationship to arterial and collector streets ❑ Names, addresses and telephone numbers of the owner, developer,engineer surveyor and designer(as applicable) ❑ Scale, north arrow and date ❑ Boundary lines of tract to be subdivided Names of adjacent subdivisions or names of recorded owners of adjoining parcels of un-subdivided land ❑ Contour lines related to a City-established benchmark at 2' intervals for 0-10% grades and 5' intervals for grades greater than 10% ❑ The purpose, location, type and size of all of the following (within and adjacent to the proposed subdivision): • Public and private right-of-ways and easements ❑ • Public and private sanitary and storm sewer lines ❑ ♦ Domestic water mains including fire hydrants ❑ • Major power telephone transmission lines (50,000 volts or greater) ❑ • Watercourses ❑ ♦ Deed reservations for parks, open spaces, pathways and other land encumbrances ❑ • The location of all trees with a diameter 6 inches or greater measured at 4 feet above ground level ❑ • The location of all structures and the present uses of the structures, and a statement of which structures are to remain after platting ❑ Supplemental information including: • Proposed deed restrictions (if any) ❑ • A proposed plan for provision of subdivision improvements ❑ Existing natural features including rock outcroppings, wetlands and marsh areas The proposed lot configurations, lot sizes and dimensions, and lot numbers. Where lots are to be used for purposes other than residential, it shall be indicated upon such lots ❑ If any of the foregoing information cannot practicably be shown on the preliminary plat, it shall be incorporated into a narrative and submitted with the application materials ❑ Preliminary Partition/Lot Line Adjustment Plan The owner of the subject parcel ❑ The owner's authorized agent ❑ The map scale, north arrow and date ❑ Proposed property lines ❑ Description of parcel location and boundaries ❑ Contour lines (2' intervals for slopes 0-10% or 5'for slopes >10%) ❑ Location,width and names of streets, easements and other public ways within and adjacent to the parcel ❑ Location of all permanent buildings on and within 25' of all property lines ❑ Location and width of all water courses ❑ Location of any trees with 6"or greater caliper at 4'above ground level ❑ All slopes greater than 25% ❑ Location of existing and proposed utilities and utility easements ❑ Any applicable deed restrictions ❑ Evidence that land partition will not preclude efficient future land division where applicable ❑ Future street extension plan showing existing and potential street connections ❑ City of Tigard Land Use Application Checklist Page 3 of 5 Site Development Plan The proposed site and surrounding properties ❑ Contour line intervals ❑ The locations, dimensions and proposed names of the following: ♦ Existing and platted streets and other public ways ❑ • Easements on the site and on adjoining properties ❑ ♦ Proposed streets or other public ways and easements on the site ❑ • Alternative routes of dead-end or proposed streets that require future extensions ❑ The locations and dimensions of the following: • Entrances and exits on the site ❑ • Parking and circulation areas ❑ • Loading and service areas ❑ • Pedestrian and bicycle circulation ❑ • Outdoor common areas ❑ ♦ Above ground utilities ❑ • Trash and recyclable material areas ❑ The locations,dimensions and setback distances of the following: • Existing permanent structures, improvements, utilities and easements which are located on the site and on adjacent property within 25' of the site ❑ • Proposed structures, improvements, utilities and easements on,the site ❑ • Sanitary sewer facilities ❑ ♦ Existing or proposed sewer reimbursement agreements ❑ • Storm drainage facilities and analysis of downstream conditions ❑ Locations and type(s) of outdoor lighting considering crime prevention techniques ❑ The locations of the following: • All areas to be landscaped ❑ • Mailboxes ❑ ♦ Structures and their orientation ❑ Landscape Plan Location of trees to be removed ❑ Location, size and species of existing plant materials ❑ General location, size and species of proposed plan materials ❑ Landscape narrative that addresses: • Soil conditions and how plant selections were derived for them ❑ • Plans for soil treatment such as stockpiling the top soil ❑ • Erosion control measures that will be used ❑ Location and description of the irrigation system where applicable ❑ Location and size of fences, buffer areas and screening ❑ Location of terraces, decks, shelters, play areas, and common open spaces ❑ Public Improvements/Streets Plan Proposed right-of-way locations and widths ❑ A scaled cross-section of all proposed streets plus any reserve strips ❑ Approximate centerline profiles showing the finished grade of all streets including street extensions for a reasonable distance beyond the limits of the proposed subdivision ❑ City of Tigard Land Use Application Checklist Page 4 of 5 Grading/Erosion Control Plan The locations and extent to which grading will take place ❑ Existing and proposed contour lines ❑ =a Slope ratios ❑ Utilities Plan Approximate plan and profiles of proposed sanitary and storm sewers with grades and pipe sizes indicated on the plans ❑ Plan of the proposed water distribution system, showing pipe sizes and the locations of valves and meter sizes ❑ Fire hydrants(existing and proposed) ❑ Proposed fire protection system ❑ Preliminary Storm Drainage Plan The location of all areas subject to inundation or storm water overflow ❑ Location, width and direction of flow of all water courses and drainageways ❑ Location and estimated size of proposed storm drainage lines ❑ Where applicable, location and estimated size and dimensions of proposed water quality/detention facility ❑ Tree Preservation/Mitigation Plan Identification of the location, size and species of all existing trees ❑ Program to save existing trees or mitigate tree removal (Section 18.790.030) Q A protection program defining standards and methods to be used during and after construction ❑ Architectural Drawings Floor plans indicating the square footage of all structures and their proposed use ❑ Elevation drawings for each elevation of the structure ❑ Sign Drawings Specify proposed location, size and height ❑ i_1;curpinlmasters\revised\checkl ist.doc 18-Sep-01 City of Tigard Land Use Application Checklist Page 5 of 5 PRE-APPLICATION CONFERENCE REQUEST CITY OF TIGARD 13125 SW Hall Blvd., Tigard, OR 97223(503) 639-4171 FAX: (503) 684-7297 GENERAL INFORMATION OR STAFF USE ONLY Salmon PCS, LLC; Mericom Corporation as v F /0.7 •Applicant: �"� r'1 ! t y,}✓ = s' u r Address: 25977 SW Canyon Ck Rd, E phone: 503-303-3012 7 —(7(t,2 `; C:t y: Wilsonville Zi 97070 �P 4 ,�� 'i — p ly -_` - � I ic:�tiQ YAC1�L?.��e 0� � �4 r i Fl -^'F;M�4 t Ed Fournier 503-303-3012 gyp. °£ �-.: Contact Person: Phone: ^,�' '` ' ' .,1 t.v Property Owner/Deed Holder(s): Arik FP SSC Property Holdings, Inc RE API ;4_,-Vi; "{�'- 1155 Valle St, #400 206-624-8100 Address: y phone: Seattle, WA 98109 �^ ' "-�;. re City: Zip: ` , g R` . p Property Address/Location(s): _ 15700 SW Pacific Highway, Tigard, REQUIRED SUBMITTAL ELEMENTS 1 (Note: applications will ri .t be accepted without the required submittal elements) Tax Map & Tax Lot#(s): 2S110DC00300 [} Pre-Application Conf. Request Form Site Size: 4.64 Ac 2 COPIES EACH OF THE FOLLOWING: 0 Brief Description of the Proposal and P any site-specific questions/issues that RE-APPLICATION CONFERENCE INFORMATION you would like to have staff research prior to the meeting. All of the information identified on this form are required to be submitted by the applicant and received by the Planning Division a n Site Plan. The site plan must show the minimum of one (1) week prior .to officially scheduling a proposed lots and/or building layouts pre-application conference date/time to allow staff ample time 'to drawn to scale. Also show the location of the subject property in relation to the prepare for the meeting nearest streets; and the locations of driveways on the subject property and A pre-application conference can usually be scheduled within 1-2 across the street. weeks of the Planning Division's receipt of the request for either Tuesday or Thursday mornings. Pre-application conferences are The Proposed Uses. one (1) hour long and are typically held between the hours of 07 Topographic Information. Include 9:00-11:00 AM. ,Contour Lines if Possible. [Yl if the Pre-Application Conference is for a PRE-APPLICATION CONFERENCES MUST BE SCHEDULED IN MONOPOLE project, the applicant must PERSON AT THE COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT COUNTER FROM attach a copy of the letter and proof in 8:00-4:00/MONDAY-FRIDAY. the form of an affidavit of mailing, that the collocation protocol was completed IF MORE THAN 4 PEOPLE ARE EXPECTED TO ATTEND THE (see Section 18.798.080 of the Tigard PRE-APPLICATION CONFERENCE IN YOUR GROUP, PLEASE Community Development Code). INFORM THE CITY IN ADVANCE SO THAT ALTERNATE ROOM n Filing Fee $240.00 ADDAMnPUFMTC rnAl aF MAnF Tn errnMMnneTF TI-1F c-ev-At- -0 -64A,6„,„ /OD- Pre-Apps (CD Meetings) March 2002 S M T W T F S 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 Thursday, March 28, 2002 31 8:00 8:30 9:00 Pre-app Ed Fourrier 503.303.3012 15700 SW Pacific- Monopole 9:30 10:00 Pre-App 10:30 11:00 Pre-app 11:30 12:00 12:30 1:00 1:30 2:00 2:30 3:00 3:30 4:00 4:30 5:00 5:30 6:00 8:12AM Thursday, March 21, 2002 MERICOM '" C DR P ❑ R A T I ❑ N March 21, 2002 Mr. Morgan Tracy City of Tigard Community Development Department 13125 SW Hall Blvd. Tigard, OR 97223 RE: Salmon PCS pre-application for a new mono-pole. Dear Mr. Tracy: On behalf of Salmon PCS, I am submitting the following land use pre-application to develop a new mono- pole and place equipment in an existing building located at 15700 SW Pacific Highway. Please find enclosed the following land use information: A. Pre-application conference request form B. Project Narrative and Development Code questions C. Site Plan — to scale, nearest streets, driveway locations, etc. D. The proposed use E. Topographic Information F. Collocation request letter and proof of mailing E. Filing Fee: a check for $240.00 is enclosed Please feel free to contact me with any questions you may have. Thank you for your attention to this matter. Sincerely, MERICOM CORPORATION l � d - d Ed) F. Fournier Senior Project Manager Direct Line: 503/303-3012 E-Mail: Ed.Fournier@Mericom.com 25977 S.W. CANYON CREEK ROAD, SUITE E, WILSONVILLE, OREGON 97070 TELEPHONE: (503) 210-1000 / FAX: (503) 210-1001 Pre-application submittal elements A. Pre-application request form is attached. B. Proposal Description Salmon PCS, LLC (Salmon) proposes a new 80' mono-pole in the ShurGuard Storage located at 15700 SW Pacific Highway. 2 antennas for each of 3 sectors attached onto the mono-pole via 5' davit arms at an elevation of 80'. Surplus space in the equipment area and mono-pole not reserved for future expansion by Salmon shall be made reasonably available for future collocation by other carriers. This pole is being designed to accommodate additional sections to easily increase the height and allow for additional collocations. Access shall be via the existing paved roadway from SW Pacific Highway. Salmon's proposed site is an unmanned facility, and would not require any water, waste treatment or management of hazardous materials. During construction or operation of the site, minimal traffic would be generated as a result of the facility. Once construction is completed, an equipment technician would visit the site approximately one time per month for routine maintenance purposes only. The proposed installation consists of installing up to 5 small equipment cabinets approximately (30"x30"x60" tall) that will be located inside two of the storage units. As call volume increases at the site additional cabinets may be added. Staff Questions and Issues 1. Type of approval process required by the city and associated timelines. 2. Additional screening / landscaping requirements. 3. Issues with extending power and telco to the site. C. Site Plan — please see attached. D. The proposed use is for development of a new mono-pole, antennas, and equipment placed in an existing storage units. E. Topographic Information. The elevation of the existing storage unit is approximately 210' MSL. The area is essentially flat. The surrounding topography is also essentially flat, with a slight slope to the east. F. Attached is a copy of the letter sent to carriers operating in the Tigard area. Also, the required affidavit of mailing has been provided in the form of copies of the USPS Receipt of Certified Mailing. Not one response was received. G. A check for the Filing Fee of$240.00 is enclosed. MERICDM'M C OR P OR A T I O N U.S. Posta ervice I. . 'ostal ervice CERTIFIED MAIL REC' 'T CERT" -D MAIL RECEIPT (Domestic Mail Only; No I, ante Coverage Provided) (Domr Ulail Only: No Insurance Coverage Provided) E• m Li, P- o-- o- m m c0 Postage IMIMI AOnO ) 00 Postage 7 Li" IT" Certified Fee `/ �l Certified Fee •/0 rn'IT ru + RJ ostmark O%1 Return Receipt Feee Return Receipt Fee Here rI) u"1 (Endorsement Required) 11',, Mere, (Endorsement Required) O Restricted Delivery Fee \/� !� 0 Restricted Delivery Fee -. E3 (Endorsement Required) •i(i. D (Endorsement Required) Total Postage&Fees 1 ° Total Postage&Fees / ru ru u-j R cipient:s me lease Prl t,Cllearly)(rope completed by mailer) 117 Recipiient's Na Pleaase Print Cllearl (To be completed by mailer) D nn rL .tiW l.rete6 ° .__L_41(��.--t trear k (.JIre( $s ° Stre Apt.No.;o PO Box No. ° Street Apt.No.;or PO Box No .LI D --qa.3---Jnt - D . cC D _1 1aci SE 38 I"`. f- N LI/'. i 4 a n ' 6 Cl '` -3r, 'r r �- 4 . • 9. 0- PS Form 3800,February 2000 See Reverse for Instructions PS Form 3800,February 2000 See Reverse for Instructions U.S. Postal Service CERTIFIED MAIL RECEIPT U.S. Postal Service (Domestic Mail Only: No Insurance Coverage Provided) CERTIFIED MAIL RECEIPT (Domestic Mail Only: No Insurance Coverage Provided) tt 0^ ru IT" m M Ir c0 Postage $ �� m 1..n c0 Postage $ - n Ln 0- Certified Fee `�� L ru O Certified Fee ru Return Receipt Fee• (Endorsement Required) Return Receipt Fee(Endorsement Required) fr D Restricted Delivery Fee O (Endorsement Required) D Restricted Delivery Fee° (Endorsent Required)Total Postage&Fees $ N y ° Total Postage&Fees Lr7 RppAI t'S Name leae'Print Clearly) mailer) ru ° [J �T Y, //en es.5 117 Re ipien 's a (Please Print Clearly)(�e completed by mailer) St 1 t,qpt No..;o '0 BBoxx No c!L s3.7 ° . kA �r-a VC ° ��/`/� r/� 4 o� Street,Apt.No.;o1r.P\O o No. A' /�/�o° Y.,fate,'"' 4 7V\ r) D I45__3.ikk\ou 1 v E 5 �vi./ N. mar i a O � "7.201 D • :A.--tat; ZIP+4 p PS Form 3800,February 2000 See Reverse for Instructions f� • . i A • l 4 ■ ■ / ' PS Form 3800,February 2000 See Reverse for Instruction U.S. Postal Service U.S. Postal Service CERTIFIED MAIL RECEIPT CERTIFIED MAIL RECEIPT (Domestic Mail Only: No Insurance Coverage Provided) (Domestic Mail Only: No Insurance Coverage Provided) ...D ° O- Q- 171 En 711111MMIIIIIIMIIIIIIM1111.11111 c0 Postage $ /`/ / Sds/� c0 Postage $ -3`7" Lri 0- 2- ti/ 0 / U Certified Fee Z •// ____ Postmark RJ Certified Fee r Return Receipt Fee '>7�'r 9 \1 ry Return Receipt Fee Postmafl9j (Endorsement Required) / Vy ; (Endorsement Required) / Rere1 0 Restricted Delivery Fee / / D (Endorsement Required) __ D Restr cted Delivery Fee (J W ° (Endorsement Required) iQ 0 Total Postage&Fees U Total Postage&Fees $ l 011 ru ° L1-I a pientis Name ((least;Print !early)(To be completed by mailer) ru . 0 LI" R . ient's Nam (Peas Print Clearly)(To be•••,• u:• •y mailer) ° Street,Rik No.;or PO�ox No. 0 Street Apt.No.;or PO B No. _tee A+�t� - G,^ 0 t.5,� 0 /aa J O >z sr- , zIP a A 9 wo 0 O • - ' - Nc r ' t4 • �l2 97_ See Reverse for Instructions PS Form 3800,February 2000 PS Form 3800,February 2000 See Reverse for Instructions Sprint PCS/VVireless M E R I C O M' 4683 Chabot Dr C O P P O R A T I O N February 25, 2002 Pleasanton, CA 94588 RE: City of Tigard, Oregon; collocation information request Dear Sir or Madam: Pursuant to the requirements of 18.798.080, Salmon PCS, LLC D.B.A Cingular Wireless is hereby providing you with notice of our intent to meet with representatives of the City of Tigard in a pre-application conference to discuss the location of a new free-standing wireless communication facility that would be located at 15700 SW Pacific Highway, Tigard, Oregon. In general, we plan to construct a mono-pole of 125 feet in height for the purpose of providing PCS service. Please inform us whether your company has any existing or pending wireless facilities located within one- thousand feet of the proposed facility, that may be available for possible collocation opportunities. Please provide us with this information within 10 business days after the date of this letter. Your cooperation is appreciated. Please feel free to contact me with any questions you may have. Thank you for your attention to this matter. Sincerely, MERICOM CORPORATION 'ward d) F. Fournier Senior Project Manager Direct Line: 503/303-3012 E-Mail: Ed.Fournier @Mericom.com 25977 SW CANYON CREEK ROAD, SUITE E, WILSONVILLE, OREGON 97070, U.S.A. TELEPHONE: (503) 303-3000 / FAX: (503) 303-3001 Voice Stream Wireless MERICOM' 12920 SE 38th St C ❑ R P C J R A T I O N Bellevue, WA 98006 February 25, 2002 RE: City of Tigard, Oregon; collocation information request Dear Sir or Madam: Pursuant to the requirements of 18.798.080, Salmon PCS, LLC D.B.A Cingular Wireless is hereby providing you with notice of our intent to meet with representatives of the City of Tigard in a pre-application conference to discuss the location of a new free-standing wireless communication facility that would be located at 15700 SW Pacific Highway, Tigard, Oregon. In general, we plan to construct a mono-pole of 125 feet in height for the purpose of providing PCS service. Please inform us whether your company has any existing or pending wireless facilities located within one- thousand feet of the proposed facility, that may be available for possible collocation opportunities. Please provide us with this information within 10 business days after the date of this letter. Your cooperation is appreciated. Please feel free to contact me with any questions you may have. Thank you for your attention to this matter. Sincerely, MERICOM CORPORATION Edwar (Ed) F. Fournier Senior Project Manager Direct Line: 503/303-3012 E-Mail: Ed.Fournier @Mericom.com 25977 SW CANYON CREEK ROAD, SUITE E, WILSONVILLE, OREGON 97070, U.S.A. TELEPHONE: (503) 303-3000 / FAX: (503) 303-3001 • AT&T Wireless M E R I C O M M 1600 SW Fourth Ave. C O R P O R A T I O N Portland, OR 97201 February 25, 2002 RE: City of Tigard, Oregon; collocation information request Dear Sir or Madam: Pursuant to the requirements of 18.798.080, Salmon PCS, LLC D.B.A Cingular Wireless is hereby providing you with notice of our intent to meet with representatives of the City of Tigard in a pre-application conference to discuss the location of a new free-standing wireless communication facility that would be located at 15700 SW Pacific Highway, Tigard, Oregon. In general, we plan to construct a mono-pole of 125 feet in height for the purpose of providing PCS service. Please inform us whether your company has any existing or pending wireless facilities located within one- thousand feet of the proposed facility, that may be available for possible collocation opportunities. Please provide us with this information within 10 business days after the date of this letter. Your cooperation is appreciated. Please feel free to contact me with any questions you may have. Thank you for your attention to this matter. Sincerely, MERICOM CORPORATION Edward (Ed) . Fournier Senior Project Manager Direct Line: 503/303-3012 E-Mail: Ed.Fournier @Mericom.com 25977 SW CANYON CREEK ROAD, SUITE E, WILSONVILLE, OREGON 97070, U.S.A. TELEPHONE: (503) 303-3000 / FAX: (503) 303-3001 Nextel Communications M E R I C O M TM 10545 Willows Rd NE Ste 100 C O R P O R A T I O N Redmond, WA 98052 February 25, 2002 RE: City of Tigard, Oregon; collocation information request Dear Sir or Madam: Pursuant to the requirements of 18.798.080, Salmon PCS, LLC D.B.A Cingular Wireless is hereby providing you with notice of our intent to meet with representatives of the City of Tigard in a pre-application conference to discuss the location of a new free-standing wireless communication facility that would be located at 15700 SW Pacific Highway, Tigard, Oregon. In general, we plan to construct a mono-pole of 125 feet in height for the purpose of providing PCS service. Please inform us whether your company has any existing or pending wireless facilities located within one- thousand feet of the proposed facility, that may be available for possible collocation opportunities. Please provide us with this information within 10 business days after the date of this letter. Your cooperation is appreciated. Please feel free to contact me with any questions you may have. Thank you for your attention to this matter. Sincerely, MERICOM CORPORATION dward (Ed) F. Fournier Senior Project Manager Direct Line: 503/303-3012 E-Mail: Ed.Fournier @Mericom.com 25977 SW CANYON CREEK ROAD, SUITE E, WILSONVILLE, OREGON 97070, U.S.A. TELEPHONE: (503) 303-3000 / FAX: (503) 303-3001 Verizon Wireless Att: Network Property Services M E R I C O M TM 3350 161St Ave. SE MS 223 C O R P O R A T I O N Bellevue, WA 98009 February 25, 2002 RE: City of Tigard, Oregon; collocation information request Dear Sir or Madam: Pursuant to the requirements of 18.798.080, Salmon PCS, LLC D.B.A Cingular Wireless is hereby providing you with notice of our intent to meet with representatives of the City of Tigard in a pre-application conference to discuss the location of a new free-standing wireless communication facility that would be located at 15700 SW Pacific Highway, Tigard, Oregon. In general, we plan to construct a mono-pole of 125 feet in height for the purpose of providing PCS service. Please inform us whether your company has any existing or pending wireless facilities located within one- thousand feet of the proposed facility, that may be available for possible collocation opportunities. Please provide us with this information within 10 business days after the date of this letter. Your cooperation is appreciated. Please feel free to contact me with any questions you may have. Thank you for your attention to this matter. Sincerely, MERICOM C RPORATION Edward ( d) F. Fournier Senior Project Manager Direct Line: 503/303-3012 E-Mail: Ed.Fournier @Mericom.com 25977 SW CANYON CREEK ROAD, SUITE E, WILSONVILLE, OREGON 97070, U.S.A. TELEPHONE: (503) 303-3000 / FAx: (503) 303-3001 • Qwest Wireless M E R I C 0 M TM 5950 NE 122°d Portland, OR 97230 C O R P O R A T I O N February 25, 2002 RE: City of Tigard, Oregon; collocation information request Dear Sir or Madam: Pursuant to the requirements of 18.798.080, Salmon PCS, LLC D.B.A Cingular Wireless is hereby providing you with notice of our intent to meet with representatives of the City of Tigard in a pre-application conference to discuss the location of a new free-standing wireless communication facility that would be located at 15700 SW Pacific Highway, Tigard, Oregon. In general, we plan to construct a mono-pole of 125 feet in height for the purpose of providing PCS service. Please inform us whether your company has any existing or pending wireless facilities located within one- thousand feet of the proposed facility, that may be available for possible collocation opportunities. Please provide us with this information within 10 business days after the date of this letter. Your cooperation is appreciated. Please feel free to contact me with any questions you may have. Thank you for your attention to this matter. Sincerely, MERICOM CORPORATION dward ( d) F. ournier Senior Project Manager Direct Line: 503/303-3012 E-Mail: Ed.Fournier@Mericom.com 25977 SW CANYON CREEK ROAD, SUITE E, WILSONVILLE, OREGON 97070, U.S.A. TELEPHONE: (503) 303-3000 / FAX: (503) 303-3001 — INA ►_ 6% CITY of TIGARD may___ il GEOGRAPHIC INFORMATION SYSTEM �� trill 1`1:-. ass .ai' d VICINITY MAP o o 15700 SW PACIFIC HWY. 4000' „ /1110111h0.. ,:' Sr FE• X11. ED 'I +C °o o o 4 ' 101 ' 41k Pry fin, o 0 si, ■tr J1111 A/Contour Wes(5ft) 9pPP an , 41111, 200 ;�} 0111 2 i 4 05 111� / IC ' i InL. t ' ";. J 1114;4" \ II t. . t ,euu'frr r i , O ��7 II ::;f9 v �, aE,wno , �iwww � / Tigard Area Map ' Jyq ��, o 4 O 1 Ski/ �,I 0 100 200 300 Feet II 1"=252 feet �4y ��Rp 14 City oe��igara An I• Information on this map is for general location Only and / l —.. should be verified with the Development Services Division. + 13125,O Hall Blvd Tigard,OR 97223 (503)839-4171 t Mlpl/www.aYpvd.a.us Community Development Plot date:Mar 21,2002;C:lmagicVMAGIC03.APR 0- .3 _ - - _ (2) ANTENNAS PER SECTOR (3) SECTORS TOTAL ANTENNAS TO BE MOUNTED TO 5'-O" - - - - DAVIT ARMS. w J 0 Di_ 0 Z 0 O O CO PROPOSED 80'-0" MONOPOLE EXIST. STORAGE EXIST. STORAGE BUILDING "B" PROPOSED 6'-0" BUILDING "E" HIGH CHAIN LINK _ _ _..._._. FENCE W/3 ..�.��- -- Issssssisl STRANDS OF ssssu■s■ri — --._..—osssssssw BARBED WIRE AT .sssssss' ----Ilulssuusssm Nisssss •■ I�s��s�i- TOP. ■sssssssi ulssss� . —_ _ ss — _ —I Issssss—I inssssss■ sssss.umi__� (2) en��oii��i Isssssssl. 2 PROPOSED rrssurssr■• r1; I BOLLARDS TYP. ■sssssss ssssssssl �.04 ssssssss ■sssssss� sommisim is • C* 00.41�i8 o ssssssu Isssssssl i;�♦♦ �►Jif EXIST. A.C. PAVED ■urssssss� ��iir Iris v0,* *400 ssssss■ rroISSTii■ssuli��•..��i .�� AREA. si.smm�s I-ossrr ummu .,A..,....1 WA: ! •sssM11s SOUTH ELEVATION 3 1/8" = 1 '-0" SK2 SALMON PCS WIRELESS — v • —°ate 3/18/02 PT-327-01 2701 NW Vaughn GAZLEY S K_3 15700 S.W. PACIFIC HWY Suite 764 PLOWMAN site No.: PT327-1 TIGARD OR 97224 503274780097210 ARCHITECTS Pr°j. No.: 503 274 7303 Fax 02-45 1 Immmilimmomr PROPOSED ROUTE N ' io OF POWER AND CB ti cc TELCO. PATCH o EXIST. A.C. ch a o PAVING AS REQ. - Z / o / / EXIST. BOLLARDS ill a TYP. % , / H / U 3'-0" MANGATE i I" TYP. o U UTILITY BOARD ■ 3 a, PROPOSED 80'-0" MONOPOLE WITH (2) ANTENNAS I o ±10'-0" PER SECTOR (3) / = a u. PROVIDE (4) ;/- SECTORS TOTAL EXIST. STORAGE '3 - a EXIST. STORAGE FLOURESCENT \ ANTENNAS TO BE :° °NN BUILDING "B" LIGHTS ABOVE. - 1 MOUNTED TO ■N 4°h L._ 5'-O" DAVIT , _— I„ ARMS. FUR OUT EXIST. - o WALL W/2X � i EXIST. A.C. PAVED • / co STUDS AND 5/8" ° t AREA. GYP. EQUIP. SIDE o / OF WALL. i i - / W =� o — ti PROPOSED EQUIP (2) PROPOSED . -vcr BOLLARDS TYP. cA N Q IN (2) EXIST. U ch a0 UNITS 8'-O" 22'-6" 71' MI- STORAGE °� 8157 AND 8158 J //�/j Z a a rn O <cn N T , N ENLARGED PLAN 2 1/8" = 1'-0" SK2 Cl) ' . imimmimmer " / • // EXIST. P.P. / NOTE ROUTE POWER AND oo ti EXIST. TELCO ALONG EXIST EASMENT © N do COMMERCIAL (— EXIST. F.H. BUILDING EXIST. F.H. (IF IT EXIST.) OTHERWISE ROUTE EXIST. 35' HIGH c i o /' ALPATCH TOPMATCHAREA CUT CONIF. TREES. •• Z • EXIST. o J LANDSCAPING TYP. �/.. �. �`' \ ` '• ^ � � ��1 o n• °(i U SECONDARY .vi/rririii/,7///////////ir/i////iirii////m////////i//iii///iii/////// ,iii////iii//////r////,iii/iii/ir,,//////ii/rii /../;rr/ii/../7 rri/////o ri ACCESS. i EXISTING ONE STORY STORAGE BUILD. "C" i a /, !.P/ i EXISTING ONE STORY STORAGE BUILD. "D" i ►may O U .i `,ii / ■ c 7 ate= ¢ !i //i//i, /iiii// y//r/r////iii////////f/////////////7//r/,/////////r//,r///,,///////////r// EXIST. C � / / / PARKING r EXISTING ONE STORY STORAGE BUILD. "B" I EXISTING ONE STORY STORAGE BUILD. "E" a r///////://////i.//////////./////////////////////iiiiii////////// /7//464 %/,//////////////////////////////iii/iii/iii////////r//r////7//////i,7/7/, > O§i RIMARY •, 4 ^^ �� r Zn awn 1D„ ',3 y N N CC E 5S /iiii/////////////rriii/i/;rrrriri/;ririi///1/iiii/iiriiriiiiiiirirri /rii it//rriiiiiiir//i/iriiii/i,iirr/riirririi/rriiiiiiriiiiiiiiirriiii� o c o / f =.. y N�n 4 h in j EXISTING ONE STORY STORAGE BUILD. "A" % EXISTING ONE STORY STORAGE BUILD. "F" % / /- / /Y///////,///U///////r//////,///////////,///rr////////////.///r1///!.%/, ////////////r/r////////r/////////////////////.//////////r///1////,/rr/U///� 'at' '. i/ ■ XIST. OFFICE. EXIST. F.H. EXIST. A.C. PAVING ..p .'4 ' ' 'ii'.iC4C4(4 '-'4 /'i )CeC (;O:i IVI41 ":44 4�,ri!.icalK 4C4 ;. .i: Gi:�i�Cih 4(41) �iGi41,44:+i C/(44CiCJlr (Gi'I'�ri(4!� C�iC GaCer riKier..�� w x,r e?� ccr0N / PROPOSED o(7� EXIST. PROJECT AREA EXISTING 12'-0" EXIST. 45' HIGH COMMERCIAL SEE 1 SK2 HIGH ARBORVITAE 0 co ao BUILDING DEC. TREES. U�rl�Q EXIST. EXIST. O o� a APARTMENTS. \ APARTMENTS. Q 0) OVERALL SITE PLAN 1 Nifi SCALE: 1" = 80'-0" SK1 i ` N ,,_ 1 (I) , , I