Loading...
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.
SDR2002-00004
SDR2002- 00004 74TH AVE . INDUSTRIAL PARK REMODEL NOTICE OF TYPE II DECISION SITE DEVELOPMENT REVIEW (SDR) 2002-00004 CITY OF TIGARD 74" AVE. INDUSTRIAL PARK REMODEL Community Development Shaping Better Community 120 DAYS = 8/6/2002 SECTION I. APPLICATION SUMMARY FILE NAME: 74th AVE. INDUSTRIAL PARK REMODEL CASE NO.: Site Development Review (SDR) SDR2002-00004 PROPOSAL: The applicant is proposing to upgrade the existing shop/garage structure into a leaseable commercial/industrial space, which will consist of 2 small offices and a storage or light manufacturing area. The scope of the project will be performed within the existing building envelope. OWNER: Jim Castile APPLICANT: Same 15715 SW 74th Avenue Tigard, OR 97224 LOCATION: 15715 SW 74th Avenue; WCTM 2S112DC, Tax Lot 1500. ZONE: I-P: Industrial Park District. The I-p zoning district provides appropriate locations for combining light manufacturing, office and small-scale commercial uses, e.g., restaurants, personal services and fitness centers, in a campus-like setting. Only those light industrial uses with no off-site impacts, e.g., noise, glare, odor, vibration, are permitted in the I-P zone. In addition to mandatory site development review, design and development standards in the I-P zone have been adopted to insure that developments will be well-integrated, attractively landscaped, and pedestrian-friendly. APPLICABLE REVIEW CRITERIA: Community Development Code Chapters 18.360, 18.390, 18.530, 18.705, 18.725, 18.745, 18.755, 18.765, 18.790, 18.795 and 18.810. SECTION II. DECISION Notice is hereby given that the City of Tigard Community Development Director's designee has APPROVED the above request subject to certain conditions of approval. The findings and conclusions on which the decision is based are noted in Section VI. NOTICE OF TYPE II DECISION SDR2002-00004/74th Ave.Industrial Park Remodel PAGE 1 OF 18 CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL THE FOLLOWING CONDITIONS SHALL BE SATISFIED PRIOR TO THE ISSUANCE OF SITE/BUILDING PERMITS: Submit evidence of complying with the following conditions to the Planning Division. Staff contact: Mathew Scheidegger. 1 . Provide a plan showing 5% of the total parking spaces reserved for carpool/vanpool use. 2. Provide a plan showing directional signs indicating the direction of the bicycle parking structure. 3. Provide a plan that shows a 2-stall bicycle rack designed according to Section 18.765.050.C. of the Tigard Development Code. THIS APPROVAL SHALL BE VALID FOR EIGHTEEN (18) MONTHS FROM THE EFFECTIVE DATE OF THIS DECISION. SECTION III. BACKGROUND INFORMATION Site History: The site was approved to be developed under SDR97-02, Site Development Review approval to allow the construction of a six (6) building, 33,520 square foot industrial park; and SLR97- 03, Sensitive Lands Review to allow land form alterations within the 100-year floodplain and wetlands. Vicinity Information: Property to the north and south are zoned Industrial Park; I-P. Property to the west is zoned Residential, 7 units per acre; R-7. The area is predominantly developed with industrial uses. Site Information and Proposal Description: The subject site contains approximately 5.55 acres and is developed with 5 industrial buildings. The western portion of the site contains both floodplain and wetland areas. The applicant is proposing to upgrade the existing shop/garage structure into a leaseable commercial/industrial space, which will consist of 2 small offices of 632 square feet and a storage or light manufacturing area of approximately 1,168 square feet. The scope of the project will be performed within the existing building envelope. SECTION IV. COMMENTS FROM PROPERTY OWNERS WITHIN 500 FEET No comments were received. SECTION V. SUMMARY OF APPLICABLE REVIEW CRITERIA A. Zoning Districts 18.520 (Commercial Zoning Districts) B. Applicable Development Code Standards 18.705 Access Egress and Circulation) 18.745 Landscapingy_and Screening) 18.755 Mixed Solid Waste and Recyclable Storage) 18.765 Off-Street parking and loading requirements) 18.780 Signs) 18.790 Tree Removal) 18.795 Visual Clearance) C. Specific DR Approval Criteria 18.360 D. Street and Utility Improvement Standards 18.810 E. Impact Study 18.390 NOTICE OF TYPE II DECISION SDR2002-00004/74`"Ave. Industrial Park Remodel PAGE 2 OF 18 SECTION VI. APPLICABLE DEVELOPMENT CODE STANDARDS A. ZONIING DISTRICT Industrial Zoning District: Section 18.530.020 Lists the description of the Industrial Zoning Districts. The site is located in the I-P: Industrial Park District. Development Standards: Section 18.530.040.B States that Development standards in commercial zoning districts are contained in Table 18.530.2 below: TABLE 18.520.2 DEVELOPMENT STANDARDS IN INDUSTRIAL ZONES STANDARD I-P Proposed Minimum Lot Size None 241,758 sq.ft. -Detached unit - -Boarding,lodging,rooming house - Minimum Lot Width 50 ft 362 ft. Minimum Setbacks -Front yard 35 ft[6] 35 ft. -Side facing street on corner&through lots[1] 20 ft - -Side yard 0/50 ft.[3] 5 ft. --Rear yard 0/20 ft[3] 30 ft. -Distance between front of garage&property line abutting a public or private street. 0/20 ft[3] Maximum Height 45 ft 20 ft. Maximum Site Coverage[2] 85% >85% Minimum Landscape Requirement 15% 65% As demonstrated in the table above, the applicant's plans comply with the dimensional standards of the I-P zone. FINDING: Based on the analysis above, the Development Standards criteria have been satisfied. B. APPLICABLE DEVELOPMENT CODE STANDARDS The Site development Review approval standards require that a development proposal be found to be consistent with the various standards of the Community Development Code. The applicable criteria in this case are Chapters 18.360, 18.390, 18.520, 18.705, 18.745, 18.755, 18.765, 18.775, 18.780, 18.790, 18.795, and 18.810. The proposal's consistency with these Code Chapters is reviewed in the following sections. Access, Egress and Circulation (18.705): Access plan: No building or other permit shall be issued until scaled plans are presented and approved as provided by this chapter that show how access, egress and circulation requirements are to be fulfilled. The applicant shall submit a site plan. The Director shall provide the applicant with detailed information about this submission requirement. The applicant has provided lans showing access, egress and circulation from SW 74th Avenue. Therefore, this standard has been satisfied. NOTICE OF TYPE II DECISION SDR2002-00004/74"'Ave.Industrial Park Remodel PAGE 3 OF 18 Joint access: Owners of two or more uses, structures, or parcels of land may agree to utilize jointly the same access and egress when the combined access and egress of both uses, structures, or parcels of land satisfies the combined requirements as designated in this title, provided: Satisfactory legal evidence shall be presented in the form of deeds, easements, leases or contracts to establish the joint use; and copies of the deeds, easements, leases or contracts are placed on permanent file with the City. No joint access is proposed at this time. Therefore, this standard does not apply. Public street access: All vehicular access and egress as required in Sections 18.705.030H and 18.705.0301 shall connect directly with a public or private street approved by the City for public use and shall be maintained at the required standards on a continuous basis. The proposed building is accessible from SW 74th Avenue, which is a public street that will be maintained as a public street. Curb cuts: Curb cuts shall be in accordance with Section 18.810.030N: Concrete curbs, curb cuts, wheelchair, bicycle ramps and driveway approaches shall be constructed in accordance with standards specified in this chapter and Section 15.04.080: Concrete curbs and driveway approaches are required; except where no sidewalk is planned, an asphalt approach may be constructed with City Engineer approval and Asphalt and concrete driveway approaches to the property line shall be built to City configuration standards. No driveway approach shall be less than five feet from the side property line projected except in cul-de-sacs, without approval and written permission of the city. The end slopes may encroach within the five foot restricted area. No portion of any driveway approach, including the end slopes, shall be located closer than thirty feet to an intersection street right-of-way line. Commercial or service drives shall not be more than thirty feet in width and if located on the same lot frontage shall be separated by a minimum length of curb of thirty feet. Each residential driveway shall be not more than twenty-six feet in width includin end slopes, and if more than one driveway is to be constructed to serve the same lot, the frontage spacing between such driveways shall be not less than thirty feet measured along the curb line. Joint access driveways shall conform to the appropriate width standard for commercial or residential type usage. The driveway approach is pre-existing. Therefore, this standard does not apply. Walkways: On-site pedestrian walkways shall comply with the following standards: Walkways shall extend from the ground floor entrances or from the ground floor landing of stairs, ramps, or elevators of all commercial, institutional, and industrial uses, to the streets which provide the required access and egress. Walkways shall provide convenient connections between buildings in multi-building commercial, institutional, and industrial complexes. Unless impractical, walkways shall be constructed between new and existing developments and neighboring developments; According to the plans submitted, a concrete walkway will extend from the main entrance of the subject building to the existing walkway of building "D," which extends to SW 74 h Avenue. Wherever required walkways cross vehicle access driveways or parking lots, such crossings shall be designed and located for pedestrian safety . Required walkways shall be physically separated from motor vehicle traffic and parking by either a minimum 6-inch vertical separation (curbed) or a minimum 3-foot horizontal separation, except that pedestrian crossings of traffic aisles are permitted for distances no greater than 36 feet if appropriate landscaping, pavement markings, or contrasting pavement materials are used. Walkways shall be a minimum of four feet in width, exclusive of vehicle overhangs and obstructions such as mailboxes, benches, bicycle racks, and sign posts, and shall be in compliance with ADA standards; NOTICE OF TYPE II DECISION SDR2002-00004/74th Ave.Industrial Park Remodel PAGE 4 OF 18 The proposed walkway crosses a traffic aisle for a distance of exactly 36 feet. The proposed walkway will be striped with 18-inch white stripes. Therefore, this standard has been met. Required walkways shall be paved with hard surfaced materials such as concrete, asphalt, stone, brick, etc. Walkways may be required to be lighted and/or signed as needed for safety purposes. Soft-surfaced public use pathways may be provided only if such pathways are provided in addition to required pathways. The plan depicts that the proposed walkway that connects the subject building to the public right-of-way will be concrete, which meets the standard. Minimum Access Requirements for Commercial and Industrial Use: Section 18.705.030.1_provides the minimum access requirements for commercial and industrial uses: Table 18.705.3 indicates that the required access width for developments with 0-99 parking spaces is one 30-foot accesses with 24 feet of pavement. Vehicular access shall be provided to commercial or industrial uses, and shall be located to within 50 feet of the primary ground floor entrances; additional requirements for truck traffic may be placed as conditions of site development review. The development has two (2) points of access into the parking lot that are 30 feet wide with 30 feet of pavement. The above standard indicates that a 30-foot-wide access with 24 feet of payment is required. Therefore, this standard has been satisfied. One-way vehicular access points: Where a proposed parking facility indicates only one-way traffic flow on the site, it shall be accommodated by a specific driveway serving the facility; the entrance drive shall be situated closest to oncoming traffic and the exit drive shall be situated farthest from oncoming traffic. The entrance drives are designed for two-way traffic. Therefore, this standard does not apply. The Director has the authority to restrict access when the need to do so is dictated by one or more of the following conditions: To provide for increased traffic movement on congested streets and to eliminate turning movement problems, the Director may restrict the location of driveways on streets and require the location of driveways be placed on adjacent streets, upon the finding that the proposed access would: • Cause or increase existing hazardous traffic conditions; or • Provide inadequate access for emergency vehicles; or • Cause hazardous conditions to exist which would constitute a clear and present danger to the public health, safety, and general welfare. To eliminate the need to use public streets for movements between commercial or industrial properties, parking areas shall be designed to connect with parking areas on adjacent properties unless not feasible. The Director shall require access easements between properties where necessary to provide for parking area connections; To facilitate pedestrian and bicycle traffic, access and parking area plans shall provide efficient sidewalk and/or pathway connections, as feasible, between neighboring developments or land uses; The access points to the subject property are pre-existing and are not considered hazardous or constitute a clear and present danger to the public health. Therefore, no access restriction is required. FINDING: Based on the analysis above, the Access, Egress and Circulation standards have been met. NOTICE OF TYPE II DECISION SDR2002-00004!741"Ave.Industrial Park Remodel PAGE 5 OF 18 Landscaping and Screening (18.745): Street Trees: Section 18.745.040 states that all development projects fronting on a public street or a private drive more than 100 feet in length shall be required to plant street trees in accordance with Section 18.745.040.0 Section 18.745.040.0 requires that street trees be spaced between 20 and 40 feet apart depending on the size classification of the tree at maturity (small, medium or large). Street trees are pre-existing, therefore, this standard is satisfied. Buffering and Screening: Section 18.745.080 states that no buffer is required between abutting uses that are of a different type when the uses are separated by a street. No buffer is required between a proposed office use and existing office use. This criterion is not applicable as this proposal does not abut a use that requires buffering in accordance with the Buffer Matrix. Therefore, this standard does not apply. Screeningg: Special Provisions: Section 18.745.050.E requires the screenin of parking and loading areas. Landscaped parking areas shall include special design features which effectively screen the parking lot areas from view. Planting materials fo be installed should achieve a relative balance between low lying and vertical shrubbery and trees. Trees shall be planted in landscaped islands in all parking areas, and shall be equally distributed on the basis of one (1) tree for each seven (7) parking spaces in order to provide a canopy effect. The minimum dimension on the landscape islands shall be three (3) feet wide and the landscaping shall be protected from vehicular damage by some form of wheel guard or curb. The parking lot associated with the subject site is pre-existing. However, 4-parking stalls are proposed that are screened naturally by the abutting Fanno Creek to the east and a chain link fence with slats to the south. Therefore, this standard has been satisfied. Screening Of Service Facilities. Except for one-family and two-family dwellings, any refuse container or disposal area and service facilities such as gas meters and air conditioners which would otherwise be visible from a public street, customer or resident parking area, any public facility or any residential area shall be screened from view by placement of a solid wood fence or masonry wall between five and eight feet in height. All refuse materials shall be contained within the screened area; Screening of Service Facilities is addressed under Chapter 18.755 (Mixed Solid Waste and Recyclable Storage). FINDING: Based on the analysis above, the landscaping and screening standards have been met. Mixed Solid Waste and Recyclables Storage (18.755): Chapter 18.755 requires that new construction incorporates functional and adequate space for on-site storage and efficient collection of mixed solid waste and source separated Recyclables prior to pick-up and removal by haulers. The applicant must choose one (1) of the following four (4) methods to demonstrate compliance: Minimum Standard,Waste Assessment, Comprehensive Recycling Plan, or Franchised Hauler Review and Sign-Off. The applicant will have to submit evidence or a plan which indicates compliance with this section. Regardless of which method chosen, the applicant will have to submit a written sign-off from the franchise hauler regarding the facility location and compatibility. The proposed tenants will utilize the existing onsite disposal storage facilities. The original disposal facilities were approved for the entire park, including building "F" (3,840 square feet) which was never constructed. Therefore, the proposed conversion of 1,800-square feet of storage shed to an office/warehouse will not generate more mixed solid waste or recyclables than what is already approved. NOTICE OF TYPE II DECISION SDR2002-00004/74`"Ave.Industrial Park Remodel PAGE 6 OF 18 Location Standards. To encourage its use, the storage area for source-separated recyclable shall be co- located with the storage area for residual mixed solid waste; Indoor and outdoor storage areas shall comply with Uniform Building and Fire Code requirements; Storage area space requirements can be satisfied with a single location or multiple locations, and can combine both interior and exterior locations; Exterior storage areas can be located within interior side yard or rear yard areas. Exterior storage areas shall not be located within a required front yard setback or in a yard adjacent to a public or private street; Exterior storage areas shall be located in central and visible locations on a site to enhance security for users; Exterior storage areas can be located in a parking area, if the proposed use provides at least the minimum number of parking spaces required for the use after deducting the area used for storage. Storage areas shall be appropriately screened according to the provisions in 18.755.050 C, design standards; The storage area shall be accessible for collection vehicles and located so that the storage area will not obstruct pedestrian or vehicle traffic movement on the site or on public streets adjacent to the site. The refuse container facility on the proposed site is pre-existing. Therefore, this standard does not apply. Design Standards. The dimensions of the storage area shall accommodate containers consistent with current methods of local collection; Storage containers shall meet Uniform Fire Code standards and be made and covered with waterproof materials or situated in a covered area; Exterior storage areas shall be enclosed by a sight-obscuring fence wall, or hedge at least six feet in height. Gate openings which allow access to users and haulers shall be provided. Gate openings for haulers shall be a minimum of 10 feet wide and shall be capable of being secured in a closed and open position; Storage area(s) and containers shall be clearly labeled to indicate the type of materials accepted. The refuse container facility on the proposed site is pre-existing. Therefore, this standard does not apply. FINDING: Based on the analysis above, the Mixed Solid Waste/Recycling Storage Standards have been met. Off-Street Parking and Loading (18.765): Location of vehicle parking: Off-street parking spaces for single-family and duplex dwellings and single-family attached dwellings shall be located on the same lot with the dwellings. Off-street parking lots for uses not listed above shall be located not further than 200 feet from the building or use that they are required to serve, measured in a straight line from the building with the following exceptions: a) commercial and industrial uses which require more than 40 parking spaces may provide for the spaces in excess of the required first 40 spaces up to a distance of 300 feet from the primary site; The 40 parking spaces which remain on the primary site must be available for users in the following order of priority: 1) Disabled-accessible spaces; 2) Short-term spaces; 3) Long-term preferential carpool and vanpool spaces; 4) Long-term spaces. In 1997, the applicant received approval for 6 buildings consisting of 33,024 square feet and was required to provide a minimum of 53 parking stalls. The site is currently developed with 5 buildings consisting of 32,068 square feet of warehouse/office space. With the addition of 632 square feet of office use and 1,168 square feet of warehouse use, current parking standards require a total of 28 parking stalls. The site plan indicates that 4 additional parking stalls will be provided for a total of 57 stalls. One of the proposed spaces is an ADA accessible stall. Therefore, this standard has been satisfied. NOTICE OF TYPE II DECISION SDR2002-00004/74`"Ave.Industrial Park Remodel PAGE 7 OF 18 Joint Parking: Owners of two or more uses, structures or parcels of land may agree to utilize jointly the same parking and loading spaces when the peak hours of operation do not overlay, subject to the following: 1) The size of the joint parking facility shall be at least as large as the number of vehicle parking spaces required by the larger(est) use per Section 18.765.070; 2) Satisfactory legal evidence shall be presented to the Director in the form of deeds, leases or contracts to establish the joint use; 3) If a joint use arrangement is subsequently terminated, or if the uses change, the requirements of this title thereafter apply to each separately. Joint parking is not proposed with this application. Therefore, this standard does not apply. Parking in Mixed-Use Projects: In mixed-use projects, the required minimum vehicle parking shall be determined using the following formula. 1) Primary use, i.e., that with the largest proportion of total floor area within the development, at 100% of the minimum vehicle parking required for that use in Section 18.765.060; 2) Secondary use, i.e., that with the second largest percentage of total floor area within the development, at 90% of the vehicle parking required for that use in Section 18.765.060; 3) Subsequent use or uses, at 80% of the vehicle parking required for that use(s) in Section 18.765.060; 4) The maximum parking allowance shall be 150% of the total minimum parking as calculated in D.1.-3. above. The subject site is developed as a mixed-use project. However, the parking area for the site is pre-existing and the applicant is roposing to add an additional 4 parking stalls, which is consistent with the amount needed for the site. Therefore, this standard has been met. Visitor Parking in Multi-Family Residential Developments: Multi-dwelling units with more than 10 required parking spaces shall provide an additional 15% of vehicle parking spaces above the minimum required for the use of guests of residents of the complex. These spaces shall be centrally located or distributed throughout the development. Required bicycle parking facilities shall also be centrally located within or evenly distributed throughout the development. This project does not involve a multi-family use. Therefore, this standard does not apply. Preferential Long-Term CarpoolNanpool Parking: Parking lots providing in excess of 20 long-term parking spaces shall provide preferential long-term carpool and vanpool parking for employees, students and other regular visitors to the site. At least 5% of total long-term parking spaces shall be reserved for carpool/vanpool use. Preferential parking for carpools/vanpools shall be closer to the main entrances of the building than any other employee or student parking except parking spaces designated for use by the disabled. Preferential carpool/vanpool spaces shall be full-sized per requirements in Section 18.765.040N and shall be clearly designated for use only by carpools and vanpools between 7:00 AM and 5:30 PM Monday through Friday. The parking lot is developed with 53 parking stalls and the applicant is proposing to add an additional 4 parking stalls for a total 57 parking stalls. Therefore, the applicant is required to provide a plan showing 5% of the total parking spaces reserved for carpool/vanpool use. Disabled-Accessible Parking: All parking areas shall be provided with the required number of parking spaces for disabled persons as specified by the State of Oregon Uniform Building Code and federal standards. Such parking spaces shall be sized, signed and marked as required by these regulations. The subject parking area is proposed to have a total of 57 parking stalls. According to the State of Oregon Uniform Building Code and Federal standards, the parking lot is required to provide 3-ADA accessible parking stalls. With the proposed addition of 1-ADA parking stall the entire site will have a total of 4-ADA parking stalls. Therefore, this standard has been met. NOTICE OF TYPE II DECISION SDR2002-00004/74'"Ave.Industrial Park Remodel PAGE 8 OF 18 Access Drives: With regard to access to public streets from off-street parking: access drives from the street to off-street parking or loading areas shall be designed and constructed to facilitate the flow of traffic and provide maximum safety for pedestrian and vehicular traffic on the site; the number and size of access drives shall be in accordance with the requirements of Chapter, 18.705 Access Egress and Circulation; access drives shall be clearly and permanently marked and det'ined through use of rails, fences, walls or other barriers or markers on frontage not occupied by service drives; access drives shall have a minimum vision clearance in accordance with Chapter 18.795, Visual Clearance; access drives shall be improved with an asphalt or concrete surface; and excluding single-family and duplex residences, except as provided by Subsection 18.810.030.P groups of two or more parking spaces shall be served by a service drive so that no backing movements or other maneuvering within a street or other public right-of-way will be required. The access drive has been addressed previously in this decision under Chapter 18.705 (Access Egress and Circulation). Pedestrian Access: Pedestrian access through parking lots shall be provided in accordance with Section 18.705.030.F. Where a parking area or other vehicle area has a drop-off grade separation, the property owner shall install a wall, railing, or other barrier which will prevent a slow-moving vehicle or driverless vehicle from escaping such area and which will prevent pedestrians from walking over drop-off edges. Pedestrian access has been discussed previously in this decision under Chapter 18.705 (Access Egress and Circulation). Parking Lot Striping: Except for single-family and duplex residences, any area intended to be used to meet the off-street parking requirements as contained in this Chapter shall have all parking spaces clearly marked; and all interior drives and access aisles shall be clearly marked and signed to show direction of flow and maintain vehicular and pedestrian safety. The plans submitted show the proposed parking spaces will be clearly marked with striping. Therefore, this standard has been satisfied. Wheel Stops: Parking spaces along the boundaries of a parking lot or adjacent to interior landscaped areas or sidewalks shall be provided with a wheel stop at least four inches high located three feet back from the front of the parking stall. The front three feet of the parking stall may be concrete, asphalt or low lying landscape material that does not exceed the height of the wheel stop. This area cannot be calculated to meet landscaping or sidewalk requirements. The proposed ADA accessible parking stall is the only stall abutting the boundary of the parcel. The site plan shows the parking stall equipped with a wheel stop. The 3-other parking stalls are interior stalls that do not abut interior landscaping. Therefore, this criterion has been met. Space and Aisle Dimensions: Section 18.765.040.N states that: "except as modified for angled parking in Figures 18.765.1 and 18.765.2 the minimum dimensions for parking spaces are: 8.5 feet x 18.5 feet for a standard space and 7.5 feet x 16.5 feet for a compact space; aisles accommodating two direction traffic, or allowing access from both ends, shall be 24 feet in width. The applicant's plans indicate that all 4-parking stalls will meet the minimum dimensions for standard parking stalls. Therefore, this standard has been satisfied. NOTICE OF TYPE II DECISION SDR2002-00004/749'Ave.Industrial Park Remodel PAGE 9 OF 18 Bicycle Parking Location and Access: Section 18.765.050 states bicycle parking areas shall be provided at locations within 50 feet of primary entrances to structures; bicycle parking areas shall not be located within parking aisles, landscape areas or pedestrian ways; outdoor bicycle parking shall be visible from on-site buildings and/or the street. When the bicycle parking area is not visible from the street, directional signs shall be used to located the parking area; and bicycle parking may be located inside a building on a floor which has an outdoor entrance open for use and floor location which does not require the bicyclist to use stairs to gain access to the space. Exceptions may be made to the latter requirement for parking on upper stories within a multi-story residential building. According to Table 18.765.2 of the Tigard Development Code, the minimum bicycle-parking requirement for 632 square feet of office is 0.5 spaces per 1,000 square feet. The minimum bicycle-parking for 1,168 square feet of warehouse is 0.1 per 1,000 square feet. The table indicates a minimum of 2 bicycle parking stalls is required. The applicant has indicated that one bicycle-parking stall will be provided for the proposed conversion. However, the applicant is required to provide a plan showing a minimum of 2-bicycle parking stalls. The proposed bicycle parking area is approximately 38 feet from the primary entrance of the building. Because the bicycle parking cannot be seen from SW 74t Avenue, the applicant will be required to provide a plan showing signs indicating the direction of the bicycle parking structure. Bicycle Parking Design Requirements: Section 18.765.050.C. The following design requirements apply to the installation of bicycle racks: The racks required -for required bicycle parking spaces shall ensure that bicycles may be securely locked to them without undue inconvenience. Provision of bicycle lockers for long-term (employee) parking is encouraged but not required; bicycle racks must be securely anchored to the ground, wall-or other structure; bicycle parking spaces shall be at least 21/2 feet by six feet long, and, when covered with a vertical clearance of seven feet. An access aisle of at least five feet wide shall be provided and maintained beside or between each row of bicycle parking; each required bicycle parking space must be accessible without moving another bicycle; required bicycle parking spaces may not be rented or leased except where required motor vehicle parking is rented or leased. At-cost or deposit fees for bicycle parking are exempt from this requirement; and areas set aside for required bicycle parking must be clearly reserved for bicycle parking only. Outdoor bicycle parking facilities shall be surfaced with a hard surfaced material, i.e., pavers asphalt, concrete or similar material. This surface must be designed to remain well drained. The applicant has not provided a detail of the bike rack to be used, therefore, the applicant will be required to provide a plan that shows a 2-stall bicycle rack designed according to Section 18.765.050.C. of the Tigard Development Code. Minimum Bicycle Parking Requirements: The total number of required bicycle parking spaces for each use is specified in Table 18.765.2 in Section 18.765.070.H. In no case shall there be less than two bicycle parking spaces. As discussed above, according to Table 18.765.2 of the Tigard Development Code, the minimum bicycle-parking requirement for an office/warehouse use is 2 spaces, which has been conditioned above. Minimum Off-Street Parking: Section 18.765.070.H states that the minimum and maximum parking shall be as required in Table 18.765.2. Minimum parking has been addressed earlier in this section. Therefore, this standard has been met. NOTICE OF TYPE II DECISION SDR2002-00004/74'"Ave.Industrial Park Remodel PAGE 10 OF 18 Off-Street Loading Spaces: Commercial, industrial and institutional buildings or structures to be built or altered which receive and distribute material or merchandise by truck shall provide and maintain off-street loading and maneuvering space as follows: A minimum of one loading space is recjuired for buildings with 10,000 gross square feet or more; A minimum of two loading spaces for buildings with 40,000 gross square feet or more. The proposal is for a 1,800 square foot conversion from a storage shed to an office/warehouse use. Therefore, no loading spaces for the distribution of materials by truck is necessary. FINDING: Based on the analysis above, the off-street parking and loading standards have not been fully met, however, if the applicant complies with the conditions listed below, the standards will be fully met: CONDITIONS: • Provide a plan showing 5% of the total parking spaces reserved for carpool/vanpool use. • Provide a plan showing directional signs indicating the direction of the bicycle parking structure. • Provide a plan that shows a 2 stall bicycle rack designed according to Section 18.765.050.C. of the Tigard Development Code. Signs (18.780): Chapter 18.780.130.D lists the type of allowable signs and sign area permitted in the MUE Zoning District. Signs are reviewed through a separate permit process administered by the Development Services Technicians. FINDING: Because signs will be reviewed and approved as part of a separate permit process, this standard has been satisfied. Tree Removal (18.790): Section 18.790.030 requires that a tree plan for the planting, removal and protection of trees prepared by a certified arborist shall be provided with a site development review application. The tree plan shall include identification of all existing trees, identification of a program to save existing trees or mitigate tree removal over 12 inches in caliper, which trees are to be removed, protection program defining standards and methods that will be used by the applicant to protect trees during and after construction. No trees are proposed to be removed by the applicant. Therefore, this standard does not apply. FINDING: Based on the analysis above, the tree removal standards have been fully met. Visual Clearance Areas (18.795): Chapter 18.795 requires that a clear vision area shall be maintained on the corners of all property adjacent to intersecting right-of-ways or the intersection of a public street and a private driveway. A clear vision area shall contain no vehicle, hedge, planting, fence, wall structure, or temporary or permanent obstruction exceeding three (3) feet in height. The code provides that obstructions that may be located in this area shall be visually clear between three (3) and eight (8) feet in height (8) (trees may be placed within this area provided that all branches below eight (8) feet are removed). A visual clearance area is the triangular area formed by measuring a 30-foot distance along the street right- of-way and the driveway, and then connecting these two (2), 30-foot distance points with a straight line. No modifications to the visual clearance at the access points of the site are being proposed with this application. Therefore, this standard does not apply. NOTICE OF TYPE II DECISION SDR2002-00004/74th Ave.Industrial Park Remodel PAGE 11 OF 18 FINDING: Based on the analysis above, the vision clearance standards have been met. C. SPECIFIC SITE DEVELOPMENT REVIEW APPROVAL STANDARDS Section 18.360.090(A)(2) through 18.360.090(A)(15) provides additional Site Development Review approval standards not necessarily covered by the provisions of the previously listed sections. These additional standards are addressed immediately below with the following exceptions: The proposal contains no elements related to the provisions of the following and are, therefore, found to be inapplicable as approval standards: 18.360.090.3 (Exterior Elevations);); 18.360.090.5 (Privacy and Noise: Multi-family or Group Living Uses); 18.360.090.6 (Private Outdoor Areas: Multi-family Use); 18.360.090.7 (Shared Outdoor Recreation Areas: Multi-family Use); 18.360.090.8 (100-year floodplain); and 18.360.090.9 (Demarcation of Spaces). The following sections were discussed previously in this decision and, therefore, will not be addressed in this section: 18.360.090.4 (Buffering, Screening and Compatibility Between Adjoining Uses; 18.360.090.13 (Parking); 18.360.090.14 (Landscaping); and 18.360.090.14 (Provision for the Disabled). Relationship to the Natural and Physical Environment: Buildings shall be: located to preserve existing trees, topography and natural drainage where possible based upon existing site conditions; located in areas not subject to ground slumping or sliding; located to provide adequate distance between adjoining buildings for adequate light, air circulation, and fire-fighting; and oriented with consideration for sun and wind. Trees shall be preserved to the extent possible. Replacement of trees is subject to the requirements of Chapter 18.790, Tree Removal. According to the applicant, the proposed building will have no impact on existing trees located on the site. Drainage is addressed later in this decision under Chapter 18.810 (Street and Utility Improvement Standards). The proposed subject building is approximately 65 feet from the nearest building also located on the subject parcel, thus providing adequate light, air circulation, and fire-fighting access. Trees have been addressed earlier under Chapter 18.790. Crime Prevention and Safety: • Windows shall be located so that areas vulnerable to crime can be surveyed by the occupants; • Interior laundry and service areas shall be located in a way that they can be observed by others; • Mail boxes shall be located in lighted areas having vehicular or pedestrian traffic; • The exterior lighting levels shall be selected and the angles shall be oriented towards areas vulnerable to crime; and • Light fixtures shall be provided in areas having heavy pedestrian or vehicular traffic and in potentially dangerous areas such as parking lots, stairs, ramps and abrupt grade changes. Fixtures shall be placed at a height so that light patterns overlap at a height of seven feet, which is sufficient to illuminate a person. The applicant's plans indicate 7 windows located on the south side of the proposed building, 2 windows on the east side, 2 windows on the west side 2 on the north side. Outdoor surface lighting will be provided on the north and south sides of the building. NOTICE OF TYPE II DECISION SDR2002-00004/74'"Ave.Industrial Park Remodel PAGE 12 OF 18 Public Transit: Provisions within the plan shall be included for providing for transit if the development proposal is adjacent to existing or proposed transit route; the requirements for transit facilities shall be based on: the location of other transit facilities in the area; and the size and type of the proposal. The following facilities may be required after City and Tri-Met review: bus stop shelters; turnouts for buses; and connecting paths to the shelters. The site has frontage on SW 74th Avenue, which is not a Tri-Met transit route. Therefore, this standard does not apply. Provisions of the Underlying Zone: All of the provisions and regulations of the underlying zone shall apply unless modified by other sections or this title, e.g., Planned Developments, Chapter 18.350; or a variance or adjustment granted under Chapter 18.370. Dimensional Requirements: Provisions of the (I-P) Industrial Park Zoning District have been addressed earlier in this decision under Section 18.530.040.B. FINDING: Based on the analysis above, the specific standards of the Site Development Review Section have been met. D. Street And Utility Improvements Standards (Section 18.810): Chapter 18.810 provides construction standards for the implementation of public and private facilities and utilities such as streets, sewers, and drainage. The applicable standards are addressed below: Streets: Improvements: Section 18.810.030.A.1 states that streets within a development and streets adjacent shall be improved in accordance with the TDC standards. Section 18.810.030.A.2 states that any new street or additional street width planned as a portion of an existing street shall be dedicated and improved in accordance with the TDC. Minimum Rights-of-Way and Street Widths: Section 18.810.030(E) requires a local residential street to have a 50-foot right-of-way width and a 32-foot paved section. Other improvements required may include on-street parking, sidewalks and bikeways, underground utilities, street lighting, storm drainage, and street trees. No additional right-of-way dedications or improvements are required. Therefore, this section does not apply. Sidewalks: Section 18.810.070.A requires that sidewalks be constructed to meet City design standards and be located on both sides of arterial, collector and local residential streets. Sidewalks are pre-existing. Therefore, no additional sidewalks will be required. Sanitary Sewers: Sewers Required: Section 18.810.090.A requires that sanitary sewer be installed to serve each new development and to connect developments to existing mains in accordance with the provisions set forth in Design and Construction Standards for Sanitary and Surface Water Management (as adopted by Clean Water Services in 1996 and including any future revisions or amendments) and the adopted policies of the comprehensive plan. NOTICE OF TYPE II DECISION SDR2002-00004/74`"Ave.Industrial Park Remodel PAGE 13 OF 18 Over-sizing: Section 18.810.090.0 states that proposed sewer systems shall include consideration of additional development within the area as projected by the Comprehensive Plan. Existing onsite utilities are sufficient for the additional impact on the site. Therefore, this standard is satisfied. Storm Drainage: General Provisions: Section 18.810.100.A states requires developers to make adequate provisions for storm water and flood water runoff. Accommodation of Upstream Drainage: Section 18.810.100.0 states that a culvert or other drainage facility shall be large enough to accommodate potential runoff from its entire upstream drainage area, whether inside or outside the development. The City Engineer shall approve the necessary size of the facility, based on the provisions of Design and Construction Standards for Sanitary and Surface Water Management (as adopted by Clean Water Services in 2000 and including any future revisions or amendments). The sites adjacent to this site are fully developed. No upstream flows impact this site. Effect on Downstream Drainage: Section 18.810.100.D states that where it is anticipated by the City Engineer that the additional runoff resulting from the development will overload an existing drainage facility, the Director and Engineer shall withhold approval of the development until provisions have been made for improvement of the potential condition or until provisions have been made for storage of additional runoff caused by the development in accordance with the Design and Construction Standards for Sanitary and Surface Water Management (as adopted by Clean Water Services in 2000 and including any future revisions or amendments). In 1997, Clean Water Services (CWS) completed a basin study of Fanno Creek and adopted the Fanno Creek Watershed Management Plan. Section V of that plan includes a recommendation that local governments institute a stormwater detention/effective impervious area reduction program resulting in no net increase in storm peak flows up to the 25-year event. The City will require that all new developments resulting in an increase of impervious surfaces provide onsite detention facilities, unless the development is located adjacent to Fanno Creek. For those developments adjacent to Fanno Creek, the storm water runoff will be permitted to discharge without detention. The site is fully developed with an existing facility that still has excess capacity. No increase of impervious surfaces is proposed. Therefore, this standard does not apply. Bikeways and Pedestrian Pathways: Bikeway Extension: Section 18.810.110.A states that developments adjoining proposed bikeways identified on the City's adopted pedestrian/bikeway plan shall include provisions for the future extension of such bikeways through the dedication of easements or right-of-way. A 15-foot easement was recorded with the original Site Development Review (SDR97-02). Therefore, no additional dedication for bikeways is required. Cost of Construction: Section 18.810.110.B states that development permits issued for planned unit developments, conditional use permits, subdivisions, and other developments which will principally benefit from such bikeways shall be conditioned to include the cost or construction of bikeway improvements. No bikeways are associated with this project. Therefore, this criterion does not apply. Minimum Width: Section 18.810.110.0 states that the minimum width for bikeways within the roadway is five feet per bicycle travel lane. Minimum width for two-way bikeways separated from the road is eight feet. NOTICE OF TYPE II DECISION SDR2002-00004/74'"Ave.Industrial Park Remodel PAGE 14 OF 18 No bikeways are associated with this project. Therefore, this criterion does not apply. Utilities: Section 18.810.120 states that all utility lines,. but not limited to those required for electric, communication lighting and cable television services and related facilities shall be placed underground, except for surface mounted transformers, surface mounted connection boxes and meter cabinets which may be placed above ground, temporary utility service facilities during construction, high capacity electric Tines operating at 50,000 volts or above, and: • The developer shall make all necessary arrangements with the serving utility to • Tprovide the underground services; he City reserves the right to approve location of all surface mounted facilities; • All underground utilities, including sanitary sewers and storm drains installed in streets by the developer, shall be constructed prior to the surfacing of the streets; and • Stubs for service connections shall be long enough to avoid disturbing the street improvements when service connections are made. Exception to Under-Grounding Requirement: Section 18.810.120.0 states that a developer shall pay a fee in-lieu of under-grounding costs when the development is proposed to take place on a street where existing utilities which are not underground will serve the development and the approval authority determines that the cost and technical difficulty of under-grounding the utilities outweighs the benefit of under-grounding in conjunction with the development. The determination shall be on a case-by-case basis. The most common, but not the only, such situation is a short frontage development for which under-grounding would result in the placement of additional poles, rather than the removal of above-ground utilities facilities. An applicant for a development which is served by utilities which are not underground and which are located across a public right-of-way from the applicant's property shall pay a fee in-lieu of under-grounding. No under-grounding of utility lines is required with this application. Therefore, this standard does not apply. ADDITIONAL CITY AND/OR AGENCY CONCERNS WITH STREET AND UTILITY IMPROVEMENT STANDARDS: Public Water System: The site is served off existing water lines from SW 74th Avenue. Therefore, this standard is satisfied. Storm Water Quality: The City has agreed to enforce Surface Water Management (SWM) regulations established by Clean Water Services (CWS) Design and Construction Standards (adopted by Resolution and Order No. 00-7) which require the construction of on-site water quality facilities. The facilities shall be designed to remove 65 percent of the phosphorus contained in 100 percent of the storm water runoff generated from newly created impervious surfaces. In addition, a maintenance plan shall be submitted indicating the frequency and method to be used in keeping the facility maintained through the year. No additional onsite water quality improvements are needed. The existing facility still has excess capacity. Grading and Erosion Control: CWS Design and Construction Standards also regulate erosion control to reduce the amount of sediment and other pollutants reaching the public storm and surface water system resulting from development, construction, grading, excavating, clearing, and any other activity which accelerates erosion. Per CWS regulations, the applicant is required to submit an erosion control plan for City review and approval prior to issuance of City permits. NOTICE OF TYPE II DECISION SDR2002-00004/74`"Ave.Industrial Park Remodel PAGE 15 OF 18 The Federal Clean Water Act requires that a National Pollutant Discharge Elimination System (NPDES) erosion control permit be issued for any development that will disturb five or more acres of land. Since this site is over five acres, the developer will be required to obtain an NPDES permit from the City prior to construction. This permit will be issued along with the site and/or building permit. No grading is proposed. Therefore, this standard does not apply. E. IMPACT STUDY (18.390) Section 18.360.090 states, "The Director shall make a finding with respect to each of the following criteria when approving, approving with conditions or denying an application:" Section 18.390.040 states that the applicant shall provide an impact study to quantify the effect of development on public facilities and services. For each public facility system and type of impact, the study shall propose improvements necessary to meet City standard, and to minimize the impact of the development on the public at large, public facilities systems, and affected private property users. In situations where the Community Development Code requires the dedication of real property interests, the applicant shall either specifically concur with a requirement for public right-of-way dedication, or provide evidence that supports that the real property dedication is not roughly proportional to the projected impacts of the development. Section 18.390.040 states that when a condition of approval requires the transfer to the public of an interest in real property, the approval authority shall adopt findings which support the conclusion that the interest in real property to be transferred is roughly proportional to the impact the proposed development will have on the public. The applicant has provided an impact study addressing the project's impacts on public systems. The Washington County Traffic Impact Fee (TIF) is a mitigation measure that is required at the time of development. Based on a transportation impact study prepared by Mr. David Larson for the A-Boy Expansion/Dolan II/Resolution 95-61, TIF's are expected to recapture 32 percent of the traffic impact of new development on the Collector and Arterial Street system. The applicant will be required to pay TIF's of approximately $3,371 based on the use proposed. Based on the estimate that total TIF fees cover 32 percent of the impact on major street improvements citywide, a fee that would cover 100 percent of this projects traffic impact is $10,534 ($3,371 divided by .32). The difference between the TIF paid, and the full impact, is considered the unmitigated impact on the collector and arterial street system. The unmitigated impact of this project on the transportation system is $7,163. However, no exaction's are required. Therefore, the rough proportionality test is met. SECTION VII. OTHER STAFF COMMENTS The City of Tigard Long Range Planning Department has reviewed the proposal and has offered the following comments. If there is to be any external work (parking, landscaping, etc.) fencing should be installed to delineate the wetland buffer before any site work begins. Property abuts Fanno Creek and is within the Fanno Creek trail corridor. The City of Tigard Public Works Department has reviewed the proposal and has no objections to it. The City of Tigard Operations Manager has reviewed the proposal and has no objections to it. NOTICE OF TYPE II DECISION SDR2002-00004/74`"Ave.Industrial Park Remodel PAGE 16 OF 18 The City of Tigard Police Department has reviewed the proposal and has offered the following comments: Request lighting plan for exterior of proposed development. The City of Tigard Building Division has reviewed the proposal and has offered the following comments: • We have questions regarding ADA restrooms serving the entire complex. Unisex restrooms are limited to 15 occupants. SECTION VIII. AGENCY COMMENTS Tualatin Valley Fire and Rescue has reviewed the proposal and has offered the following comments: I have reviewed the submittal for the above named project and have the following comments: 1. A minimum of 1 fire hydrant shall be provided for this development It shall be located so that no part of the structure is more than 250 feet from the fire hydrant. (UFC 903.4) 2. Fire hydrant locations shall be identified by the installation of reflective markers. The markers shall be blue. They shall be located adjacent and to the side of the centerline of the access roadway that the fire hydrant is located on. In case that there is no center line, then assume a centerline, and place the reflectors accordingly. (UFC Sec. 901.4.3) SECTION IX. PROCEDURE AND APPEAL INFORMATION Notice: Notice was posted at City Hall and mailed to: X The applicant and owners X Owner of record within the required distance X Affected government agencies Final Decision: THIS DECISION IS FINAL ON JUNE 3, 2002 AND BECOMES EFFECTIVE ON JUNE 18, 2002 UNLESS AN APPEAL IS FILED. Appeal: The decision of the Director (Type II Procedure) or Review Authority (Type II Administrative Appeal or Type III Procedure) is final for purposes of appeal on the date that it is mailed. Any party with standing as provided in Section 18.390.040.G.1. may appeal this decision in accordance with Section 18.390.040.G.2. of the Tigard Community Development Code which provides that a written appeal together with the required fee shall be filed with the Director within ten (10) business days of the date the notice of the decision was mailed. The appeal fee schedule and forms are available from the Planning Division of Tigard City Hall, 13125 SW Hall Boulevard, Tigard, Oregon 97223. NOTICE OF TYPE II DECISION SDR2002-00004/74`"Ave.Industrial Park Remodel PAGE 17 OF 18 Unless the applicant is the appellant, the hearing on an appeal from the Director's Decision shall be confined to the specific issues identified in the written comments submitted by the parties during the comment period. Additional evidence concerning issues properly raised in the Notice of Appeal may be submitted by any party during the appeal hearing, subject to any additional rules of procedure that may be adopted from time to time by the appellate body. THE DEADLINE FOR FILING AN APPEAL IS AT 5:00 PM ON JUNE 17, 2002. Questions: If you have any questions, please call the City of Tigard Planning Division, Tigard City Hall, 13125 SW Hall Boulevard, Tigard, Oregon at (503) 639-4171. ! r ,- - - June 3, 2002 PREPAR• I r. Oft&thew "fr. -...egger DATE Assistant Planner • iv June 3, 2002 APPROVED BY: Richard H ewersdorff DATE Planning Manager I:\curpin\mathew\sdr\S DR2002-00004.dec.dot NOTICE OF TYPE II DECISION SDR2002-00004/74'"Ave.Industrial Park Remodel PAGE 18 OF 18 111111115 Z I I CITY of TIGARD ril GEOGRAPHIC INFORMATION SYSTEM ipv1,■ VICINITY MAP a REDWOOD LN dill N *AA III g VIII. -I SDR2002-00004 , aII t1IIIlIP •• HI 1111111111111110 !IuIIII ♦♦ Q ` 74TH AVENUE AS} FORDST , I I I ., al a III= CKABLELN INDUSTRIAL PARK ARK - • . REMODEL T.1 ^ / Q a t 1 _ y� z `„ C CV/ I,; ..'.TAVLSMS Fur, {,9 I i ,r .,��10] �� � � it v �, � w 5F� 4; lk IM I Or1 ', 1 _ � ' Ili r __ I I W \ 0O ''�M1tL xfT I �I}9�NfTAi R ` JQ a 9EN0 R0.' i... AEI--.I � I1i11111111111i V n. f �� Tigard Area Map 2 II 1I� C9 r. LL O12- I N a i / x H A• 0 100 200 300 400 Feet n '9 4 1"=320 feet tn Sly 0((' %.* 44 yIwRO / City of Tigard ,• inform ation on this map Is for general location only and should hR verified vith the Development SeMus Division. 13125 SW Hall Blvd Tigard,OR 97223 NeN64 http://www.ci.tpard,or .us Community Development Plot date:Apr 15,2002:C:lmagic\MAGIC03.APR / / r-------------- -\ 1 FLOOD PLAIN BOUNDARY LINE (// •/ / I lia t / 1 AR F / / 1 R„T< �,,o / 1 I EXTG.CARE ' / TAKERS RESIDENCE I ! e - i / m 1 / I / a fl 0 r., NEW ACCESSIBLE ROUTE • TO CONNECT TO EXISTING / I 20'-0” ROUTE \ 1 \\\\\ \\ �0'e0' AC. • 2 SPACES AT 20' 40 PAVEMENT \\ 4"WIDE • { l�PAINTED I 8 ACCESSIBLE t 36'-0' \\ /� I ROUTE `/_/\ / ` STRIPES I EXTG. i i I 9 `18"WIDE PAINTED_ EXI ING CATCH L J L J W 0 STRIPES(WHITE) _ ROU E \ .0 BASIN OFFICE WAREHOUSE WAREHOUSE OFFICE -Q' P A R K I N G D A T A i0 316 SF. / MANN' / MANUF. 316 5F 9 584 SF. 584 S.F. cad) NEW A.G. THE FOLLOWING USE AREAS HAVE BEEN ,� FROM TOILET ASSUMED IN ORDER TO ESTIMATE IN BEST ROOM TO I JUDGMENT,THE NECESSARY PARKING 12'-0", 43'-0" 12'-0" BEXISTING EXISTING } SPACES REQUIRED I , l • 6 '-0" �� C . 57'_4" ROUTE. EXTG. OFFICE 2 SPACES - % ` ' BLDG. 'D' O 632 SF.ASSUMED EXTG_WATER i } 632 / 1,000 b3 x 2.10 = 1.'1 I i FACILITY A.C. I WAREHOUSE /MANUF. 1 SPACES \ PAVEMENT PROPOSED 1 168 5F.ASSUMED - ' NEW RESTROOM 1,168 / 1,000 = 12 x 030 = 35 / TOTAL REQUIRED SPACES 3 TOTAL SPACES PROVIDED 4 I STANDARD (EXTRA SPACE OR LOST SPACE 2 PARALLEL AT START CF NEW ROUTE) I DISABLED a CITY OF TIGARD SDR2002-00004 CITY OF TIOARD - - .. ... .. SITE Pt_AN N 74T" AVENUE INDUSTRIAL PARK REMODEL (Map is not to scale) NOTICE OF TYPE II DECISION SITE DEVELOPMENT REVIEW (SDR) 2002-00004 tw9rl CITY OF TIGARD 74" AVE. INDUSTRIAL PARK REMODEL WL, Community(Development .Shaping A Better Commu ni 120 DAYS = 8/6/2002 SECTION I. APPLICATION SUMMARY FILE NAME: 74th AVE. INDUSTRIAL PARK REMODEL CASE NO.: Site Development Review (SDR) SDR2002-00004 PROPOSAL: The applicant is proposing to upgrade the existing shop/garage structure into a leaseable commercial/industrial space, which will consist of 2 small offices and a storage or light manufacturing area. The scope of the project will be performed within the existing building envelope. OWNER: Jim Castile APPLICANT: Same 15715 SW 74th Avenue Tigard, OR 97224 LOCATION: 15715 SW 74th Avenue; WCTM 2S112DC, Tax Lot 1500. ZONE: I-P: Industrial Park District. The I-p zoning district provides appropriate locations for combining light manufacturing, office and small-scale commercial uses, e.g., restaurants, personal services and fitness centers, in a campus-like setting. Only those light industrial uses with no off-site impacts, e.g., noise, glare, odor, vibration, are permitted in the I-P zone. In addition to mandatory site development review, design and development standards in the I-P zone have been adopted to insure that developments will be well-integrated, attractively landscaped, and pedestrian-friendly. APPLICABLE REVIEW CRITERIA: Community Development Code Chapters 18.360, 18.390, 18.530, 18.705, 18.725, 18.745, 18.755, 18.765, 18.790, 18.795 and 18.810. SECTION II . DECISION Notice is hereby given that the City of Tigard Community Development Director's designee has APPROVED the above Site Development Review request subject to certain conditions of approval. The findings and conclusions on which the decision is based are noted in the full decision, available at City Hall. THIS APPROVAL SHALL BE VALID FOR 18 MONTHS FROM THE EFFECTIVE DATE OF THIS DECISION. All documents and applicable criteria in the above-noted file are available for inspection at no cost or copies can be obtained for twenty-five cents (25 ) per page, or the current rate charged for copies at the time of the request. SECTION III. PROCEDURE AND APPEAL INFORMATION Notice: Notice mailed to: X The applicant and owners X Owner of record within the required distance X Affected government agencies Final Decision: THIS DECISION IS FINAL ON JUNE 3, 2002 AND BECOMES EFFECTIVE ON JUNE 18, 2002 UNLESS AN APPEAL IS FILED. A. eal_: The Director's Decision is final on the date that it is mailed. All persons entitled to notice or who are otherwise adversely affected or aggrieved by the decision as provided in Section 18.390.040.G.1 may appeal this decision in accordance with Section 18.390.040.G.2 of the Tigard Community Development Code which provides that a written appeal together with the required fee shall be filed with the Director within ten (10) business days of the date the Notice of Decision was mailed. The appeal fee schedule and forms are available from the Planning Division of Tigard City Hall, 13125 SW Hall Boulevard, Tigard, Oregon 97223. Unless the applicant is the appellant, the hearing on an appeal from the Director's Decision shall be confined to the specific issues identified in the written comments submitted by the parties during the comment period. Additional evidence concerning issues properly raised in the Notice of Appeal may be submitted by any party during the appeal hearing, subject to any additional rules of procedure that may be adopted from time to time by the appellate body. I THE DEADLINE FOR FILING AN APPEAL IS 5:00 PM ON JUNE 17, 2002. I Questions: For further information please contact the Planning Division Staff Planner, Mathew Scheide•ger at (503) 639-4171 , Tigard City Hall, 13125 SW Hall Boulevard, Tigard, Oregon 97223. l wasimiamar _ . ��y%�. VICINITY MAP Ill N �1�111 Mipai' al In=111 VIM NIP" \\\\ SDR2002-00004 Ell g/aiiiit� D III -.■i1i11i1111w a 74TH AVENUE 111111:11H4111111-16. , PARK L'1 ; REMODEL LIM IBIZMIMIIIMMI h\.\\ i 111111 !■ �\�� ` , m-,9 ( e i \ ---we" .111111 �� � �� ,F �1�- f � p 111111 111111111111 \ � t.,,,_, 7-111111 X11111111111=■ s .1.---� &fi s, Ws City of Tisard //��/\\ \ .�6 Nrraw w FL OM LN / / // i■ /� / I / / •' T/ / • E1R4 CART Tan R[SOQGE /• t /m N ! / TO CON.,TO EXISTIS. ! I � -... ■�� I PAWdT E~ UV . 1:::. .flllll'. • „ �a C'T i i ti OE P CAT •-_��-� TItlPE0l4M1{) \ , 1 DARN WAIRNoIM NrINDM!M6F -6 P A R K I N G D A T A �5a sF. !f. AG FOLLOWING S FOLLOG VW.AREAS NAVE GCE 1 A —' '°''To I T I t'L AN 3XHED N ORDER T0 E671147!N GIST p_d M'-tl T+'-O' EkISTNa [x1eTll� JUDCf1ENT,THE NECl/I1ART PARKING l� y !- I • lkTO. SPACES REOIJIPED I rte'"-��--'-'��• it'-0' - d.D.D' CTSICSEF 1 SPACES } f ara EUm ! 62 rIp009U.6ED X1.10•ll II r , L___, WRENoleE/MANIA. I ISPACEE k, I ',AMR W PROPOSED -- I'6e SF.MEWED .f TOTAL.0.1IRED ErACES-3 TOTAL d•ACE9 PROVIDED-• ",,,,R. ..nrrsa.an. ?DIeRALLEL /� /�ApLED A4i CITY OF TIGARD 1` sDR2002-00004 L SITE PLAN N 74"AVENUE INDUSTRIAL PARK REMODEL (Map is not to sale) _— _ - -- --- -- - - --- - - NOTICE TO MORTGAGEE, LIENHOLDER,VENDOR OR SELLER: THE TIGARD DEVELOPMENT CODE REQUIRES THAT IF YOU RECEIVE THIS NOTICE,IT SHALL BE PROMPTLY FORWARDED TO THE PURCHASER. NOTICE OF PENDING LAND USE APPLICATION ,, CITY OF Tld SITE DEVELOPMENT REVIEW O TIGARD Community Dew(opment S&apingA(Better Community DATE OF NOTICE: April 17, 2002 FILE NUMBER: SITE DEVELOPMENT REVIEW (SDR) 2002-00004 Type II Land Use Application FILE NAME: 74TH AVENUE INDUSTRIAL PARK REMODEL PROPOSAL: The applicant is proposing to upgrade the existing shop/garage structure into a leaseable commercial/industrial space, which will consist of 2 small offices and a storage or light manufacturing area. The scope of the project will be performed within the existing building envelope. ZONE: I-P: Industrial Park District. The I-P zoning district provides appropriate locations for combining light manufacturing, office and small-scale commercial uses, e.g., restaurants, personal services and fitness centers, in a campus-like setting. Only those light industrial uses with no off-site impacts, e.g., noise, glare, odor, vibration, are permitted in the I-P zone. In addition to mandatory site development review, design and development standards in the I-P zone have been adopted to insure that developments will be well-integrated, attractively landscaped, and pedestrian-friendly. APPLICABLE REVIEW CRITERIA: Community Development Code Chapters 18.360, 18.390, 18.530, 18.705, 18.725, 18.745, 18.755, 18.765, 18.790, 18.795 and 18.810. LOCATION: 15715 SW 74th Avenue; WCTM 2S112DC, Tax Lot 1500. YOUR RIGHT TO PROVIDE WRITTEN COMMENTS: Prior to the City making any decision on the Application, you are hereby provided a fourteen (14) day period to submit written comments on the application to the City. THE FOURTEEN (14) DAY PERIOD ENDS AT 5:00 PM ON MAY 1, 2002. All comments should be directed to Mathew Scheidegger, Assistant Planner in the Planning Division at the City of Tigard, 13125 SW Hall Boulevard, Tigard, Oregon 97223. You may reach the City of Tigard by telephone at (503) 639-4171. ALL COMMENTS MUST BE RECEIVED BY THE CITY OF TIGARD IN WRITING PRIOR TO 5:00 PM ON THE DATE SPECIFIED ABOVE IN ORDER FOR YOUR COMMENTS TO BE CONSIDERED IN THE DECISION MAKING PROCESS THE CITY OF TIGARD APPRECIATES RECEIVING COMMENTS AND VALUES YOUR INPUT. COMMENTS WILL BE CONSIDERED AND ADDRESSED WITHIN THE NOTICE OF DECISION. A DECISION ON THIS ISSUE IS TENTATIVELY SCHEDULED FOR MAY 14, 2002. IF YOU PROVIDE COMMENTS, YOU WILL BE SENT A COPY OF THE FULL DECISION ONCE IT HAS BEEN RENDERED. WRITTEN COMMENTS WILL BECOME A PART OF THE PERMANENT PUBLIC RECORD AND SHALL CONTAIN THE FOLLOWING INFORMATION: • Address the specific "Applicable Review Criteria" described in the section above or any other criteria believed to be applicable to this proposal; ♦ Raise any issues and/or concerns believed to be important with sufficient evidence to allow the City to provide a response; ♦ Comments that provide the basis for an appeal to the Tigard Hearings Officer must address the relevant approval criteria with sufficient specificity on that issue. Failure of any party to address the relevant approval criteria with sufficient specificity may preclude subsequent appeals to the Land Use Board of Appeals or Circuit Court on that issue. Specific findings directed at the relevant approval criteria are what constitute relevant evidence. AFTER THE 14 DAY COMMENT PERIOD CLOSES, THE DIRECTOR SHALL ISSUE A TYPE II ADMINISTRATIVE DECISION. THE DIRECTOR'S DECISION SHALL BE MAILED TO THE APPLICANT AND TO OWNERS OF RECORD OF PROPERTY LOCATED WITHIN 500 FEET OF THE SUBJECT SITE, AND TO ANYONE ELSE WHO SUBMITTED WRITTEN COMMENTS OR WHO IS OTHERWISE ENTITLED TO NOTICE. THE DIRECTOR'S DECISION SHALL ADDRESS ALL OF THE RELEVANT APPROVAL CRITERIA. BASED UPON THE CRITERIA AND THE FACTS CONTAINED WITHIN THE RECORD, THE DIRECTOR SHALL APPROVE, APPROVE WITH CONDITIONS OR DENY THE REQUESTED PERMIT OR ACTION. SUMMARY OF THE DECISION-MAKING PROCESS: ♦ The application is accepted by the City ♦ Notice is sent to property owners of record within 500 feet of the proposed development area allowing a 14-day written comment period. ♦ The application is reviewed by City Staff and affected agencies. ♦ City Staff issues a written decision. ♦ Notice of the decision is sent to the Applicant and all owners or contract purchasers of record of the site; all owners of record of property located within 500 feet of the site, as shown on the most recent property tax assessment roll; any City-recognized neighborhood group whose boundaries include the site; and any governmental agency which is entitled to notice under an intergovernmental agreement entered into with the City which includes provision for such notice or anyone who is otherwise entitled to such notice. INFORMATION/EVIDENCE AVAILABLE FOR REVIEW: The application, written comments and supporting documents relied upon by the Director to make this decision are contained within the record and are available for public review at the City of Tigard Community Development Department. Copies of these items may be obtained at a cost of $.25 per page or the current rate charged for this service. Questions regarding this application should be directed to the Planning Staff indicated on the first page of this Notice under the section titled "Your Right to Provide Written Comments." 1 ,C%d. CITVTIGARr= VICINITY MAP WORE ' •W••DLN fili 1111 1U NM Am= •∎ flip SDR2002-00004 Nom. '•milt LE • N. 111 !.HFQRDS r: 74TH AVENUE `\111111 j .1111 \ INDUSTRIAL PARK - Nor air . REMODEL MLR r� y n a ii1iiiiitU,I ! I , , IIo., , n tR, ;1 � -42 . !111111 x11111111111 N1 ` `, s II . r IIIr�, : 11 r 2 O m ug. 7o N ems ,,.4-01*4 o 0o r City of Tigard i�•/// ! • NW M..iIW.T..t .nm E.MU.01.1.. Ill[.PMII.NN rp,aw nay �5 Iwn s»+m N\ wo:nwwes.a..» REQUEST FOR COMMENTS REQUEST FOR COMMENTS CITY OF TIGARD Community(Development Shaping A Better Community DATE: April 11,2002 D,e 1 TO: Brian Rager,Development Review Engineer ,SCt, 114 FROM: City of Tigard Planning Division STAFF CONTACT: Mathew Scheidegger,Assistant Planner 1x3111 Phone: (5031639-4111/Fax: [5031684-1291 SITE DEVELOPMENT REVIEW ISDR12002-00004 74"AVENUE INDUSTRIAL PARK REMODEL REQUEST: The applicant is proposing to upgrade the existing shop/garage structure into a leaseable commercial/industrial space, which will consist of 2 small offices and a storage or light manufacturing area. The sc9pe of the orojJect will be performed within the existing building envelope. LOCATION: 15715 SW 74'1 Avenue; VJCTM 2S112DC, Tax Lot 1500. ZONE: I-P: Industrial Park District. The I-P zoning district provides appropriate locations for combining light manufacturing, office and small-scale commercial uses, e.g., restaurants, personal services and fitness centers, in a campus-like setting. Only those light industrial uses with no off-site impacts, e.g., noise, glare, odor, vibration, are permitted in the I-P zone. In addition to mandatory site development review, design and development standards in the I-P zone have been adopted to insure that developments will be well-integrated, attractively landscaped, and pedestrian-friendly. APPLICABLE REVIEW CRITERIA: Community Development Code Chapters 18.360, 18.390, 18.530, 18.705, 18.725, 18.745, 18.755, 18.765, 18.790, 18.795 and 18.810. Attached are the Site Plan, Vicinity Map and Applicant's Materials for your review. From information supplied by various departments and agencies and from other information available to our staff, a report and recommendation will be prepared and a decision will be rendered on the proposal in the near future. If you wish to comment on this application, WE NEED YOUR COMMENTS BACK BY: MAY 1, 2002. You may use the space provided below or attach a separate letter to return your comments. If you are unable to respond by the above date, please phone the staff contact noted above with your comments and confirm your comments in writing as soon as possible. If you have any questions, contact the Tigard Planning Division, 13125 SW Hall Boulevard, Tigard, OR 97223. PLEASE CHECK THE FOLLOWING ITEMS THAT APPLY: We have reviewed the proposal and have no objections to it. Please contact of our office. Please refer to the enclosed letter. Written comments provided below: • 1va okroo r.ot-1A.-- Dk_Pe-Ctdk)S 1? - vt.APf AEt.srS Rrck+•rt t-ED utiikil (4-P`.>>T • LI-CNATES ▪ hb k'o u- p?&e • a r Fh�c.r CAL flu-- (•1s c �j{L�°.� (a*A G t`/l- 1(Please provide thefotrowing information)Name of Person(s) Commenting: 1PP _ - Phone Number(s): v REQUEST FOR COMMENTS CITY OF IGARD Community'Deve(opment ShapingA Better Community DATE: April 11,2002 RECEIVED PLANNING TO: Jim Wolf,Tigard Police Department Crime Prevention Officer t"".Y 0 6 2002 FROM: City of Tigard Planning Division CITY OF TIi;ARf. STAFF CONTACT: Mathew Scheidegger,Assistant Planner[x3111 Phone: [5031639-4111/Fax: [5031684-1291 SITE DEVELOPMENT REVIEW[SDR1 2002-00004 74"AVENUE INDUSTRIAL PARK REMODEL REQUEST: The applicant is proposing to upgrade the existing shop/garage structure into a leaseable commercial/industrial space, which will consist of 2 small offices and a storage or light manufacturing area. The sc e of the project will be performed within the existing building envelope. LOCATION: 15715 SW 74t"Avenue; WCTM 2S112DC, Tax Lot 1500. ZONE: I-P: Industrial Park District. The I-P zoning district provides appropriate locations for combining light manufacturing, office and small-scale commercial uses, e.g., restaurants, personal services and fitness centers, in a campus-like setting. Only those light industrial uses with no off-site impacts, e.g., noise, glare, odor, vibration, are permitted in the I-P zone. In addition to mandatory site development review, design and development standards in the I-P zone have been adopted to insure that developments will be well-integrated, attractively landscaped, and pedestrian-friendly. APPLICABLE REVIEW CRITERIA: Community Development Code Chapters 18.360, 18.390, 18.530, 18.705, 18.725, 18.745, 18.755, 18.765, 18.790, 18.795 and 18.810. Attached are the Site Plan, Vicinity Map and Applicant's Materials for your review. From information supplied by various departments and agencies and from other information available to our staff, a report and recommendation will be prepared and a decision will be rendered on the proposal in the near future. If you wish to comment on this application, WE NEED YOUR COMMENTS BACK BY: MAY 1, 2002. You may use the space provided below or attach a separate letter to return your comments. If you are unable to respond by the above date, please phone the staff contact noted above with your comments and confirm your comments in writing as soon as possible. If you have any questions, contact the Tigard Planning Division, 13125 SW Hall Boulevard, Tigard, OR 97223. I PLEASE CHECK THE FOLLOWING ITEMS THAT APPLY: We have reviewed the proposal and have no objections to it. Please contact of our office. Please refer to the enclosed letter. Written comments provided below: P�tgo<�t c,K, cio►v„" crA e tu∎0( OF Q(oRix.,/A 44 t (1r'lease provide the following infonnation)Name of Person(s) Commenting: a � It IPhone Number(s): y. I REQUEST FOR COMMENTS CITY OF Community(Development Shaping A Better Community RECEIVED PLANNING L)tA4 DATE: April 11,2002 APR 3 0 20 4 TO: Barbara Shields,Long Range Planning Manager CITY OF'WARD FROM: City of Tigard Planning Division STAFF CONTACT: Mathew Scheidegger,Assistant Planner[x3111 Phone: [5031639-4171/Fax: [5031684-7297 SITE DEVELOPMENT REVIEW MDR]2002-00004 74TH AVENUE INDUSTRIAL PARK REMODEL < REQUEST: The applicant is proposing to upgrade the existing shop/garage structure into a leaseable commercial/industrial space, which will consist of 2 small offices and a storage or light manufacturing area. The scope of the project will be performed within the existing building envelope. LOCATION: 15715 SW 74t"Avenue; WCTM 2S112DC, Tax Lot 1500. ZONE: I-P: Industrial Park District. The I-P zoning district provides appropriate locations for combining light manufacturing, office and small-scale commercial uses, e.g., restaurants, personal services and fitness centers, in a campus-like setting. Only those light industrial uses with no off-site impacts, e.g., noise, glare, odor, vibration, are permitted in the I-P zone. In addition to mandatory site development review, design and development standards in the I-P zone have been adopted to insure that developments will be well-integrated, attractively landscaped, and pedestrian-friendly. APPLICABLE REVIEW CRITERIA: Community Development Code Chapters 18.360, 18.390, 18.530, 18.705, 18.725, 18.745, 18.755, 18.765, 18.790, 18.795 and 18.810. Attached are the Site Plan, Vicinity Map and Applicant's Materials for your review. From information supplied by various departments and agencies and from other information available to our staff, a report and recommendation will be prepared and a decision will be rendered on the proposal in the near future. If you wish to comment on this application, WE NEED YOUR COMMENTS BACK BY: MAY 1, 2002. You may use the space provided below or attach a separate letter to return your comments. If you are unable to respond by the above date, please phone the staff contact noted above with your comments and confirm your comments in writing as soon as possible. If you have any questions, contact the Tigard Planning Division, 13125 SW Hall Boulevard, Tigard, OR 97223. PLEASE CHECK THE FOLLOWING ITEMS THAT APPLY: We have reviewed the proposal and have no objections to it. Please contact of our office. Please refer to the enclosed letter. Written comments provided below: (c1&ase provide the following information)Name of Person(s) Commenting: IPhone Number(s): I ,„./43,/ c9„. Z.,(574_.0 74i J ciI 77 .i ce .i rt J lam. rr 1 / C-C/-r( c(Wes REQUEST FOR COMMENTS CITY OFTIGARD Community(Development Shaping Better Community DATE: April 11,2002 RECEIVED PLANNING TO: Dennis Koellermeier,Operations Manager/Water Department '\PR 1 8 2002 FROM: City of Tigard Planning Division CITY C.TI(GARD STAFF CONTACT: Mathew Scheidegger,Assistant Planner tx3171 Phone: (5031 639-4111/Fax: 1503)684-7291 SITE DEVELOPMENT REVIEW ISDRI 2002-00004 74Th AVENUE INDUSTRIAL PARK REMODEL REQUEST: The applicant is proposing to upgrade the existing shop/garage structure into a leaseable commercial/industrial space, which will consist of 2 small offices and a storage or light manufacturing area. The sc e of the project will be performed within the existing building envelope. LOCATION: 15715 SW 74th Avenue; WCTM 2S112DC, Tax Lot 1500. ZONE: I-P: Industrial Park District. The I-P zoning district provides appropriate locations for combining light manufacturing, office and small-scale commercial uses, e.g., restaurants, personal services and fitness centers, in a campus-like setting. Only those light industrial uses with no off-site impacts, e.g., noise, glare, odor, vibration, are permitted in the I-P zone. In addition to mandatory site development review, design and development standards in the I-P zone have been adopted to insure that developments will be well-integrated, attractively landscaped, and pedestrian-friendly. APPLICABLE REVIEW CRITERIA: Community Development Code Chapters 18.360, 18.390, 18.530, 18.705, 18.725, 18.745, 18.755, 18.765, 18.790, 18.795 and 18.810. Attached are the Site Plan, Vicinity Map and Applicant's Materials for your review. From information supplied by various departments and agencies and from other information available to our staff, a report and recommendation will be prepared and a decision will be rendered on the proposal in the near future. If you wish to comment on this application, WE NEED YOUR COMMENTS BACK BY: MAY 1, 2002. You may use the space provided below or attach a separate letter to return your comments. If you are unable to respond by the above date, please phone the staff contact noted above with your comments and confirm your comments in writing as soon as possible. If you have any questions, contact the Tigard Planning Division, 13125 SW Hall Boulevard, Tigard, OR 97223. PLEASE CHECK THE FOLLOWING ITEMS THAT APPLY: We have reviewed the proposal and have no objections to it. _ Please contact of our office. Please refer to the enclosed letter. Written comments provided below: — (cPfease provide the folrowing information)Name of Person(s) Commenting: 4,/ �`� I Phone Number(s): i �( �jj ff'' I REQUEST FOR COMMENTS CITY OFTIGARD Community(Development Shaping A(Better Community DATE: Aril 11,2002 RECEIVED PLANNING TO: n Roy,Property Manager/Public Works Department APR 1 8 2002 CITY OF WARD FROM: City of Tigard Planning Division STAFF CONTACT: Mathew Scheidegger,Assistant Planner[x3171 Phone: [5031639-4111/Fax: [5031684-1291 SITE DEVELOPMENT REVIEW ISDRI 2002-00004 74'AVENUE INDUSTRIAL PARK REMODEL REQUEST: The applicant is proposing to upgrade the existing shop/garage structure into a leaseable commercial/industrial space, which will consist of 2 small offices and a storage or light manufacturing area. The sc e of the project will be performed within the existing building. envelope. LOCATION: 15715 SW 74th Avenue; WCTM 2S112DC, Tax Lot 1500. ZONE: I-P: Industrial Park District. The I-P zoning district provides appropriate locations for combining light manufacturing, office and small-scale commercial uses, e.g., restaurants, personal services and fitness centers, in a campus-like setting. Only those light industrial uses with no off-site impacts, e.g., noise, glare, odor, vibration, are permitted in the I-P zone. In addition to mandatory site development review, design and development standards in the I-P zone have been adopted to insure that developments will be well-integrated, attractively landscaped, and pedestrian-friendly. APPLICABLE REVIEW CRITERIA: Community Development Code Chapters 18.360, 18.390, 18.530, 18.705, 18.725, 18.745, 18.755, 18.765, 18.790, 18.795 and 18.810. Attached are the Site Plan, Vicinity Map and Applicant's Materials for your review. From information supplied by various departments and agencies and from other information available to our staff, a report and recommendation will be prepared and a decision will be rendered on the proposal in the near future. If you wish to comment on this application, WE NEED YOUR COMMENTS BACK BY: MAY 1, 2002. You may use the space provided below or attach a separate letter to return your comments. If you are unable to respond by the above date, please phone the staff contact noted above with your comments and confirm your comments in writing as soon as possible. If you have any questions, contact the Tigard Planning Division, 13125 SW Hall Boulevard, Tigard, OR 97223. PLEASE CHECK THE FOLLOWING ITEMS THAT APPLY: L/ We have reviewed the proposal and have no objections to it. Please contact of our office. Please refer to the enclosed letter. Written comments provided below: (Please provide the folTowing information)Name of Person(s) Commenting: IPhone Number(s): I Atk, REQUEST FOR COMMENTS CITY OFT PD Community Development Shaping Better Community DATE: April 11,2002 RECEIVED PLANNING TO: Daryl Jones,Senior Plans Examiner APR 1 8 2002 FROM: City of Tigard Planning Division CITY OF TIGARD STAFF CONTACT: Mathew Scheidegger,Assistant Planner(x3111 Phone: (5031639-4171/Fax: 15031604-7297 SITE DEVELOPMENT REVIEW(SDR]2002-00004 WITH AVENUE INDUSTRIAL PARK REMODEL I REQUEST: The applicant is proposing to upgrade the existing shop/garage structure into a leaseable commercial/industrial space, which will consist of 2 small offices and a storage or light manufacturing area. The swipe of the project will be performed within the existing building envelope. LOCATION: 15715 SW 74'1 Avenue; WCTM 2S112DC, Tax Lot 1500. ZONE: I-P: Industrial Park District. The I-P zoning district provides appropriate locations for combining light manufacturing, office and small-scale commercial uses, e.g., restaurants, personal services and fitness centers, in a campus-like setting. Only those light industrial uses with no off-site impacts, e.g., noise, glare, odor, vibration, are permitted in the I-P zone. In addition to mandatory site development review, design and development standards in the I-P zone have been adopted to insure that developments will be well-integrated, attractively landscaped, and pedestrian-friendly. APPLICABLE REVIEW CRITERIA: Community Development Code Chapters 18.360, 18.390, 18.530, 18.705, 18.725, 18.745, 18.755, 18.765, 18.790, 18.795 and 18.810. Attached are the Site Plan, Vicinity Map and Applicant's Materials for your review. From information supplied by various departments and agencies and from other information available to our staff, a report and recommendation will be prepared and a decision will be rendered on the proposal in the near future. If you wish to comment on this application, WE NEED YOUR COMMENTS BACK BY: MAY 1, 2002. You may use the space provided below or attach a separate letter to return your comments. If you are unable to respond by the above date, please phone the staff contact noted above with your comments and confirm your comments in writing as soon as possible. If you have any questions, contact the Tigard Planning Division, 13125 SW Hall Boulevard, Tigard, OR 97223. PLEASE CHECK THE FOLLOWING ITEMS THAT APPLY: We have reviewed the proposal and have no objections to it. Please contact of our office. Please refer to the enclosed letter. Written comments provided below: Z ;1n2/ Ofease provide thiefo1Towing information)Name of Person(s) Commenting: Phone Number(s): I REQUEST FOR COMMENTS C;OFTICiARD Community(DeveCopment ShapingA Better Community DATE: April 17,2002 TO: PER ATTACHED FROM: City of Tigard Planning Division STAFF CONTACT: Mathew Scheidegger,Assistant Planner 1x3171 Phone: 15031639-41M/Fax: 15031684-7297 SITE DEVELOPMENT REVIEW MDR]2002-00004 ➢ 74TM AVENUE INDUSTRIAL PARK REMODEL < REQUEST: The applicant is proposing to upgrade the existing shop/garage structure into a leaseable commercial/industrial space, which will consist of 2 small offices and a storage or light manufacturing area. The sc a of the project will be performed within the existing building envelope. LOCATION: W 15715 SW 74t"Avenue; CTM 2S112DC, Tax Lot 1500. ZONE: I-P: Industrial Park District. The I-P zoning district provides appropriate locations for combining light manufacturing, office and small-scale commercial uses, e.g., restaurants, personal services and fitness centers, in a campus-like setting. Only those light industrial uses with no off-site impacts, e.g., noise, glare, odor, vibration, are permitted in the I-P zone. In addition to mandatory site development review, design and development standards in the I-P zone have been adopted to insure that developments will be well-integrated, attractively landscaped, and pedestrian-friendly. APPLICABLE REVIEW CRITERIA: Community Development Code Chapters 18.360, 18.390, 18.530, 18.705, 18.725, 18.745, 18.755, 18.765, 18.790, 18.795 and 18.810. Attached are the Site Plan, Vicinity Map and Applicant's Materials for your review. From information supplied by various departments and agencies and from other information available to our staff, a report and recommendation will be prepared and a decision will be rendered on the proposal in the near future. If you wish to comment on this application, WE NEED YOUR COMMENTS BACK BY: MAY 1, 2002. You may use the space provided below or attach a separate letter to return your comments. If you are unable to respond by the above date, please phone the staff contact noted above with your comments and confirm your comments in writing as soon as possible. If you have any questions, contact the Tigard Planning Division, 13125 SW Hall Boulevard, Tigard, OR 97223. PLEASE CHECK THE FOLLOWING ITEMS THAT APPLY: We have reviewed the proposal and have no objections to it. _ Please contact of our office. Please refer to the enclosed letter. Written comments provided below: (ci) ase provide the following information)Name of Person(s) Commenting: I Phone Number(s): I CITY TIGARD REQUEST FOR CO P .NTS NOTIFICATION LIST FOR LAND USE & COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT APPLICATIONS 1� FILE NOS.: :��__ 00 Z-/ FILE NAME: ! � CITIZEN INVOLVEMENT TEAMS 14-DAY PENDING APPLICATION NOTICE TO CIT AREA: ❑Central 13tast ❑South ❑West OProposal Descrip. in Library CIT Book CITY OFFICES ,4--LONG RANGE PLANNING/Barbara Shields,Planning Mgr. COMMUNITY DVLPMNT.DEPT./Planning-Engineering Techs. POLICE DEPT./Jim Wolf,Crime Prevention Officer ,'BUILDING DIVISION/Gary Lampella,Building Official ( NGINEERING DEPT./Brian Rager,Dvlpmnt.Review Engineer_ ATER DEPT./Dennis Koellermeier,Operations Mgr. _CITY ADMINISTRATION/Cathy Wheatley,City Recorder PUBLIC WORKS/John Roy,Property Manager _PUBLIC WORKS/Matt Stine,Urban Forester ✓PLANNER—POST PROJECT SITE IF A PUBLIC HEARING ITEM-10 BUSINESS DAYS PRIOR TO THE PUBLIC HEARING! _C.D./Sherman Casper,Permit Coord.(soR)cuP reTIF) SPECIAL DISTRICTS _ TUAL.HILLS PARK&REC.DIST.* Y.-TUALATIN VALLEY FIRE&RESCUE * _ TUALATIN VALLEY WATER DISTRICT. _ CLEANWATER SERVICES* Planning Manager Fire Marshall Administrative Office Lee Walker/SWM Program 15707 SW Walker Road Washington County Fire District PO Box 745 155 N.First Avenue Beaverton,OR 97006 (place in pick-up box) Beaverton,OR 97075 Hillsboro,OR 97124 LOCAL AND STATE JURISDICTIONS CITY OF BEAVERTON * _ CITY OF TUALATIN * ' 'OR.DEPT.OF FISH&WILDLIFE _OR.DIV.OF STATE LANDS _ Planning Manager Planning Manager 2501 SW First Avenue Jennifer Goodridge _ Irish Bunnell,Development Services PO Box 369 PO Box 59 775 Summer Street NE PO Box 4755 Tualatin,OR 97062 Portland,OR 97207 Salem,OR 97301-1279 Beaverton,OR 97076 OR.PUB.UTILITIES COMM. METRO-LAND USE&PLANNING * OR.DEPT.OF GEO.&MINERAL IND. 550 Capitol Street NE — CITY OF DURHAM * 600 NE Grand Avenue 800 NE Oregon Street,Suite 5 Salem,OR 97310-1380 City Manager Portland,OR 97232-2736 Portland,OR 97232 PO Box 23483 _ Bob Knight,Data Resource Center(ZCA) _US ARMY CORPS.OF ENG. Durham,OR 97281-3483 _ Paulette Allen,Growth Management Coordinator _OR.DEPT.OF LAND CONSERV.&DVLP. Kathryn Harris Mel Huie,Greenspaces Coordinator(CPA/ZOA) Larry French(Corny Plan Amendments Only) Routing CENWP-OP-G _CITY OF KING CITY +If _ Jennifer Budhabhatti,Reg anal Planner(Wetlands) 635 Capitol Street NE,Suite 150 PO Box 2946 City Manager _ C.D. Manager,Growth Management Services Salem,OR 97301-2540 Portland,OR 97208-2946 15300 SW 116th Avenue King City,OR 97224 WASHINGTON COUNTY OR.DEPT.OF ENERGY(Powedines in Area) _OREGON DEPT.OF TRANS.(ODOT) Dept.of Land Use&Transp. Bonneville Power Administration Aeronautics Division(Monopole Towers) 155 N. First Avenue _CITY OF LAKE OSWEGO * Routing TTRC–Attn: Renae Ferrera Tom Highland,Planning Suite 350,MS 13 Planning Director PO Box 3621 3040 25th Street,SE Hillsboro,OR 97124 PO Box 369 Portland,OR 97208-3621 Salem,OR 97310 _Brent Curtis(CPA) Lake Oswego,OR 97034 _Gregg Leion(CPA) 34.,OR.DEPT.OF ENVIRON.QUALITY(DEQ) ODOT,REGION 1 * _Anne LaMountain(IGA/URB) _CITY OF PORTLAND (Notify for Wetlands and Potential Environmental Impacts) _Sonya Kazen,Development Review Coordinator Phil Healy(IGA/URB) David Knowles,Planning Bureau Dir Regional Administrator _Carl Toland, Right-of-Way Section(vacations) teve Conway(General Apps.) Portland Building 106,Rm. 1002 2020 SW Fourth Avenue,Suite 400 123 NW Flanders _Sr.Cartographer icPAuzcuiMS 14 1120 SW Fifth Avenue Portland,OR 97201-4987 Portland,OR 97209-4037 _Jim Nims(zcA)Ms 15 Portland,OR 97204 _Doria Mateja(zcA)Ms 14 WCCCA(911)(Monopole Towers) _ODOT,REGION 1 -DISTRICT 2A Dave Austin Jane Estes,Permit Specialist 17911 NW Evergreen Parkway 5440 SW Westgate Drive,Suite 350 Beaverton,OR 97006 Portland,OR 97221-2414 UTILITY PROVIDERS AND SPECIAL AGENCIES _PORTLAND WESTERN FUR,BURLINGTON NORTHERN/SANTA FE RJR,OREGON ELECTRIC RJR(Burlington Northern/Santa Fe RIR Predecessor) Robert I. Melbo, President&General Manager 110 W. 10th Avenue Albany,OR 97321 _SOUTHERN PACIFIC TRANS.CO.R/R _METRO AREA COMMUNICATIONS _AT&T CABLE —TRI-MET TRANSIT DVLPMT. Clifford C.Cabe,Construction Engineer Debra Palmer(Annexations Only) Pat McGann of Project is Within V.Mlle of A Transit Route) 5424 SE McLoughlin Boulevard Twin Oaks Technology Center 14200 SW Brigadoon Court Ben Baldwin,Project Planner Portland,OR 97232 1815 NW 169th Place,S-6020 Beaverton,OR 97005 710 NE Holladay Street Beaverton,OR 97006-4886 Portland,OR 97232 _PORTLAND GENERAL ELECTRIC _NW NATURAL GAS COMPANY — VERIZON _ QWEST COMMUNICATIONS Jim VanKleek, Svc.Design Consultant Scott Palmer,Engineering Coord. Ken Perdue,Engineering Jeri Cella,Engineering 9480 SW Boeckman Road 220 NW Second Avenue PO Box 1100 8021 SW Capitol Hill Rd,Rm 110 Wilsonville,OR 97070 Portland,OR 97209-3991 Beaverton,OR 97075-1100 Portland,OR 97219 —TIGARD/TUALATIN SCHOOL DIST.#23J_BEAVERTON SCHOOL DIST.#48 — AT&T CABLE(Ape.Ea Ham a99w) Marsha Butler,Administrative Offices Jan Youngquist,Demographics&Planning Dept. Diana Carpenter 6960 SW Sandburg Street 16550 SW Merlo Road 3500 SW Bond Street Tigard,OR 97223-8039 Beaverton,OR 97006-5152 Portland,OR 97232 ♦ INDICATES AUTOMATIC NOTIFICATION IN COMPLIANCE WITH INTERGOVERNMENTAL AGREEMENT IF WITHIN 500' OF THE SUBJECT PROPERTY FOR ANY/ALL CITY PROJECTS (Project Planner Is Responsible For Indicating Parties To Notify). h:\patty\masters\Request For Comments Notification List 2.doc (Revised: 8-Mar-02) MAILING RECORDS • AFFIDAVIT OF MAILING CITY TIGARD Community(Development Shaping Better Community I, Patricia L. Lunsford, being first duly sworn/affirm, on oath depose and say that I am a Senior Administrative Specialist for the City of Tigard,, Washington County, Oregon and that I served the following: (Check Appropriate Box(s)Below} © NOTICE OF DECISION FOR: SDR2002-00004/74' AVENUE INDUSTRIAL PARK REMODEL ❑ AMENDED NOTICE (File No./Name Reference) ® City of Tigard Planning Director A copy of the said notice being hereto attached, marked Exhlblt"A",and by reference made a part hereof, was mailed to each named person(s) at the address(s) shown on the attached list(s), marked Exhibit'B",and by reference made a part hereof, on June 3,2002,and deposited in the United States Mail on lune 3,2002, postage prepaid. ...'_� .� ,A. ,, (Person •: Pre.- ed Noti e) STATE OE ORGON ) County of Washington )ss. City of'Tigard ) Subscribed and sworn/affirmed before me on the / i3 day of , 2002. OFFICIAL� SEAL / ".Z7 DIANE M JELDERKS �,�� � ALL ' NOTARY PUBLIC-OREGON COMMISSION NO.326578 /6_.3 MY COMMISSION EXPIRES SEPT.07,2003 My Commission Exp ' s: � EMI! NOTICE OF TYPE II DECISION SITE DEVELOPMENT REVIEW (SDR) 2002-00004 . I� CITY OF TIGARD 74T" AVE. INDUSTRIAL PARK REMODEL Community(Development Shaping A(Better Community 120 DAYS = 8/6/2002 SECTION I. APPLICATION SUMMARY FILE NAME: 74th AVE. INDUSTRIAL PARK REMODEL CASE NO.: Site Development Review (SDR) SDR2002-00004 PROPOSAL: The applicant is proposing to upgrade the existing shop/garage structure into a leaseable commercial/industrial space, which will consist of 2 small offices and a storage or light manufacturing area. The scope of the project will be performed within the existing building envelope. OWNER: Jim Castile APPLICANT: Same 15715 SW 74th Avenue Tigard, OR 97224 LOCATION: 15715 SW 74th Avenue; WCTM 2S112DC, Tax Lot 1500. ZONE: I-P: Industrial Park District. The I-p zoning district provides appropriate locations for combining light manufacturing, office and small-scale commercial uses, e.g., restaurants, personal services and fitness centers, in a campus-like setting. Only those light industrial uses with no off-site impacts, e.g., noise, glare, odor, vibration, are permitted in the I-P zone. In addition to mandatory site development review, design and development standards in the I-P zone have been adopted to insure that developments will be well-integrated, attractively landscaped, and pedestrian-friendly. APPLICABLE REVIEW CRITERIA: Community Development Code Chapters 18.360, 18.390, 18.530, 18.705, 18.725, 18.745, 18.755, 18.765, 18.790, 18.795 and 18.810. SECTION II . DECISION Notice is hereby given that the City of Tigard Community Development Director's designee has APPROVED the above Site Development Review request subject to certain conditions of approval. The findings and conclusions on which the decision is based are noted in the full decision, available at City Hall. THIS APPROVAL SHALL BE VALID FOR 18 MONTHS FROM THE EFFECTIVE DATE OF THIS DECISION. All documents and applicable criteria in the above-noted file are available for inspection at no cost or copies can be obtained for twenty-five cents (25 ) per page, or the current rate charged for copies at the time of the request. SECTION III. PROCEDURE AND APPEAL INFORMATION Notice: Notice mailed to: X The applicant and owners X Owner of record within the required distance X Affected government agencies Final Decision: THIS DECISION IS FINAL ON JUNE 3, 2002 AND BECOMES EFFECTIVE ON JUNE 18, 2002 UNLESS AN APPEAL IS FILED. Appeal The Director's Decision is final on the date that it is mailed. All persons entitled to notice or who are otherwise adversely affected or aggrieved by the decision as provided in Section 18.390.040.G.1 may appeal this decision in accordance with Section 18.390.040.G.2 of the Tigard Community Development Code which provides that a written appeal together with the required fee shall be filed with the Director within ten (10) business days of the date the Notice of Decision was mailed. The appeal fee schedule and forms are available from the Planning Division of Tigard City Hall, 13125 SW Hall Boulevard, Tigard, Oregon 97223. Unless the applicant is the appellant, the hearing on an appeal from the Director's Decision shall be confined to the specific issues identified in the written comments submitted by the parties during the comment period. Additional evidence concerning issues properly raised in the Notice of Appeal may be submitted by any party during the appeal hearing, subject to any additional rules of procedure that may be adopted from time to time by the appellate body. THE DEADLINE FOR FILING AN APPEAL IS 5:00 PM ON JUNE 17, 2002. I Questions: For further information please contact the Planning Division Staff Planner, Mathew Scheideqger at (503) 639-4171, Tigard City Hall, 13125 SW Hall Boulevard, Tigard, Oregon 97223. mormaildiumm VICINITY MAP 1.1 , ` , LN tun Sliail g 1 VIM We SDR2002-00004 ;.mmmmok 4 II .IIIIIIIr 74TH AVENUE 111111 1101111-END EN INDUSTRIAL PARK ON�� REMODEL LAN �'r -Jor. a NU. M 1 F-Lv li 7 .111111 ! : : !u\����� �W 111111 111111 1511 i7 111/ 4111111/ I - . I ... . n an no no an -Ka 1 6® IRD / _Pr..�...rr • nhh .. Alk 1 ••••••••••••••••••■•■•••■■••.• .LaoD FL.N / / // /� EOI.oARf L.E /A / / A> _ w / y/ o :o cvieclioEe axl+n =I. ]SPACES AT N>.� 4-WOE i b Y ACOEa61ELe ,=0if1- ,,,,,, ,�TIEPES Rare,l _ �IIIIII II:IIIIII111I �� ,'..� I earn. •IP; � --....7,—:=De,. = I,, / 1 mT L , L sTRn•e3 rv.Te� 1/'}•••°°°"""III"' a•+ m.I•ENalee 00ssiaLSe � P A R K I N G D A T A g �> / New AC. a eoeuw/c TIE FOLLCNNG VSE•AREAS NAVE EEEN I a io M.y/EM,1 TO SAM'PARKING ST 0-0.1 0.-0' i e'-C FTNl lxbTwO SPACES REOIIIED ��-4 leoule - n r OFFICE SPACES 6 I 1 •32 SF.ASSUMED exin..IA AK/I000•A•3•]TO•IT 2 I' FAULIT, ) SA. UI.VffIflJs€/ItNJF. I SPACES PAV@ER� pliicaeosEo NW R aa OAS SF.ASSIPED -__-___-_-_- W6 •1 --rte�-��rs_x_T>r.a-fir•=.s 1-•- TRIAL REQUIRED SPACES-3 TOTAL SPACES PRONDED-4 I STANDAPD u yW�� ]PARALLEL ••�� I DISApLED •4‘■ CITY OF TIGARD T SDR2002.00004 SITE PLAN N 74"AVENUE INDUSTRIAL PARK REMODEL I[Map Is not to scale)_ - 2511213C-01500 2S112C0-07900 74TH AVENUE INDUSTRIAL PARK LLC DANCHOK INVESTMENT GROUP INC 8100 SW DURHAM RD 8475 SW ERNST RD TIGARD,OR 97224 PORTLAND,OR 97225 2S 112CD-00701 S 112CD-08300 BLACKWELL JAY M&TRACI N rA • OK INVEST A • GROUP INC 15950 SW 76TH 8475 S 'D TIGARD,OR 97224 ••RTLAND,OR • 5 2S 112CD-00700 2S 112CD-09100 BOUMAN DONNA L 1• .0K INVEST • GROUP INC 15940 SW 76TH AVE 8475 SW •i► •D TIGARD,OR 97224 ':- •ND,OR 9 2S 112DC-01600 2S112CD-08100 BOWLES JOHN MARGARET OK INVESTMENT G OUP INC 8986 SW ARAPAHO RD 8475 SW ER TUALATIN,OR 97062 EAR ND,OR 9722 2S 112CD-07300 2S 112CD-08700 BRANSON GREGORY L&LESLIE H I•• HOK INVESTME -OUP INC 15838 SW 76TH AVE 8475 SW '• •• TIGARD,OR 97224 P• OR • 2S 112CD-08600 2S 112CD-07800 CARICO SUSAN E D '- •• NVESTMENT 'OUP INC 7570 SW ONNAF CT 8475 SW ERN '• TIGARD,OR 97224 D,OR 97225 2S 112DC-00200 2S 112CD-08000 CATELLUS DEVELOPMENT CORPORATION L3A1d6 K INVESTMENT GROUP INC PROPERTY TAX DEPARTMENT 8475 S 201 MISSION ST RTLAND,OR 972 SAN FRANCISCO,CA 94105 -".112DC-00201 2S112CD-03200 CA • LUS DEVELOPME .-'ORATION DAVIS EDWARD L PROPE•'41 TAX D '-•TMENT 20375 SW 93RD AVE 201 'M'ISS s T TUALATIN,OR 97062 uAN FRANCISC., a 94105 2S 112CD-00200 2S 113AB-00800 CHRISTENSEN PHILLIP E AND DUNCAN JOHN A AND SALLY C JANICE LEE 15685 SW 76TH AVE 7060 SW PALMER WAY TIGARD,OR 97224 BEAVERTON,OR 97007 2S 112CD-03000 2S113AB-01600 CUNNINGHAM RONALD R&ANNE C DUNCAN JOHN ARTHUR AND 7685 SW BOND JANICE LEE TIGARD,OR 97224 7060 SW PALMER WAY BEAVERTON,OR 97007 2S112(&-074O0 2S112CA-13200 ERDMANN LENNY G&CAROL A HOLZGANG CHRISTOPHER R& 15854 SW 76TH AVE MARY ANN TIGARD,OR 97224 15508 SW 76TH AVE TIGARD,OR 97224 2S 112CD-09300 2S 112CD-07600 FANNO CREEK TOWNHOMES HOWIE GEORGE E&DEBRA A OWNERS OF LOTS 1-11 15876 SW 76TH AVE 8475 SW ERNEST RD TIGARD,OR 97224 PORTLAND,OR 97225 2S 112CD-09000 2S 112CA-13000 ' •.•NO CREEK TOWNH• • HUTTON BRIAN D&DEBORAH A OWN • . OF • " -11 15566 SW 76TH AVE 8475 SW • - • T RD TIGARD,OR 97224 P•' AND,OR 9 5 2S 112CD-09200 2S 112CD-08200 F• O CREEK TOWNH•' S ILTZ JUDITH ANN OWNE' • LS : -11 7555 SW ONNAF CT 8475 SW -" 'D TIGARD,OR 97224 •.- LAND,OR 972 25112CD-08000 2S 112DC-01400 • NO CREEK TOWN • ES JDS LLC& OWN '_ •F LO -11 SANTA FE INVESTORS#1 LLC 8475 SW • 1- RD C/O PACIFIC SANTA FE CORP P•• •ND,OR 97 5 17700 SW UPPPER BOONES FERRY RD PORTLAND,OR 97224 251 12CA-13100 2S 112DB-00800 GIESBRECHT FRANK&HELEN JOHNSON ORVAL D& 15532 SW 76TH AVE REICHEL DAVID L TIGARD,OR 97224 15515 SW 74TH TIGARD,OR 97223 2S 112CA-12900 2S 112CD-08500 GOODPASTER RONALD D/STEPHANIE M KASER JEFFREY RAY&PATTI L 15585 SW 76TH AVE 7525 SW ONNAF CT TIGARD,OR 97224 TIGARD,OR 97224 2S112CD-01000 2S112CD-00400 HAMBACH MILDRED TRUSTEE KNAUSS HARVEY L 7735 SW DURHAM RD 14383 SW MCFARLAND BLVD TIGARD,OR 97223 TIGARD,OR 97223 2S 1 12CA-12700 2S 112CD-03400 HANSEN GLENN M&BRENDA L LAIRD WAYNE E&TRACI L 15622 SW 76TH AVE 7660 SW BOND TIGARD,OR 97224 TIGARD,OR 97223 2S 112CD-00800 2S 1120C-01300 HAVERY JOHN W MADELON LARUSSO CONCRETE COMPANY INC 15970 SW 76TH AVE 15930 SW 74TH AVE TIGARD,OR 97224 TIGARD,OR 97224 • 2S112LD-08400 2S112CD-00900 MAGEE KENNETH W RIVAS ERNEST ROSE 7535 SW ONNAF CT 16060 SW 76TH AVE TIGARD,OR 97224 TIGARD,OR 97223 2S 112CD-08800 2S 112CA-08400 MAGEE KENNETH W& SAKAGUCHI MAKOTO&JOAN HALL MAGEE CLAUDIA R 7574 SW ASHFORD ST 7590 SW ONNAF CT TIGARD,OR 97224 TIGARD, OR 97224 2S 112DC-01800 2S 112CD-07700 NADEAU ANDRE R TRUSTEE SANDERS RODNEY E&KANA M 7774 VLAHOS DR 15900 SW 76TH WILSONVILLE, OR 97070 TIGARD,OR 97224 2S 112CD-03300 2S 112CA-12800 NEUFELD DAVID& SCHERER STEPHEN T&JANET K SIMPART LORRI 15610 SW 76TH AVE 15895 SW 76TH AVE TIGARD,OR 97224 TIGARD, OR 97224 2S1 12D B-00400 23 112CA-08600 OR-WASH ENTERPRISES UNLIMITED SHERK CHRISTIAN C&TRUDI L BY JOHN F MEUPERT 7562 SW ASHFORD ST 111 SW 5TH AVE#3400 TIGARD,OR 97224 PORTLAND,OR 97204 23 112DC-00500 2S1 2DC-01601 PACIFIC REALTY ASSOCIATES TIGA'I CI IF ATTN: M CONZATTI 1312 :It .ALL 15350 SW SEQUOIA PKWY STE 300 T 'ARD,OR 223 PORTLAND,OR 97224 2S 112DC-00100 2S 112CA-13400 PACIFIC REALTY ASSOCIATES TIGA OF 15350 SW SEQUOIA PKWY#300-WMI 1312 LL PORTLAND,OR 97224 TI RD,OR 9 3 2S 1 12CD-00300 2 12CA-11900 PATTON KENT D&AMY SAGER TIGA C F 160 TIMBERLAKE 131 ALL ASHLAND,OR 97520 TI ARD,OR 23 2S 112CA-08300 2S 112CD-03500 QUANG YEN SUSAN&HAU HOWARD WAGNER ERNST J 7582 SW ASHFORD ST 7680 SW BOND TIGARD, OR 97224 TIGARD,OR 97224 112CA-13300 2S112CD-03100 RE • SANC ••D NO.2 WALTON WILLIAM TODD& MARY FRAN OWNE' . OTS 54-55 7655 SW BOND ST • TIGARD,OR 97224 2S114CA-08500 WHITE PAUL& HELEN 7633 SW ASHFORD ST TIGARD,OR 97224 2S 112CA-08200 WINDER SCOTT R&KAREN B 7588 SW ASHFORD ST TIGARD,OR 97224 ORVAL D. JOHNSON & DAVID L REICHEL C/O MONA JOHNSON P.O. BOX 55 GATSON, OR 97119 DANCHOK 817 NW SKYLINE CRE ST ROAD PORTLAND, OR 97229-6834 DANCHOK INVESTMENT GROUP 817 NW SKYLINE CREST ROAD PORTLAND, OR 97229-6834 Jack Biethan 11023 SW Summerfield Drive, #4 Tigard, OR 97224 Sue Rorman 11250 SW 82nd Avenue Tigard, OR 97223 Naomi Gallucci 11285 SW 78th Avenue Tigard, OR 97223 Michael Trigoboff 7072 SW Barbara Lane Tigard, OR 97223 Dieter Jacobs 7775 SW Spruce Street Tigard, OR 97223 Alexander Craghead 12205 SW Hall Boulevard Tigard, OR 97223-6210 David Chapman 9840 SW Landau Place Tigard, OR 97223 Nathan and Ann Murdock PO Box 231265 Tigard, OR 97281 CITY OF TIGARD - EAST CIT SUBCOMMITTEE (i:\curpin\setup\labels\CIT East.doc) UPDATED: December 27, 2001 Jack Biethan 11023 SW Summerfield Drive, #4 Tigard, OR 97224 Kristen Miller 8940 SW Edgewood Street Tigard, OR 97223 Paul Owen 10335 SW Highland Drive Tigard, OR 97224 Louise Fronville 15760 SW Oak Meadow Lane Tigard, OR 97224 Tim Esav PO Box 230695 Tigard, OR 97281 Nathan and Ann Murdock PO Box 231265 Tigard, OR 97281 Ross Sundberg 16382 SW 104th Avenue Tigard, OR 97224 :ITY OF TIGARD - SOUTH CIT SUBCOMMITTEE (pg. I of I) (i:lcurpin\setup\labels\CIT South.doc) UPDATED: January 11, 2002 ‘ . AFFIDAVIT OF MAILING CITY Y OF H OF TNARD Community Devethpment Shaping J4 Better Community I, Patricia L. Lunsford, being first duly sworn/affirm, on oath depose and say that I am a Senior Administrative Specialist for the City of'Tigard;Washington County, Oregon and that I served the following: (Check Appropriate Box(s)Below) MI NOTICE OF DECISION FOR: SDR2002-00004/74"1 AVENUE INDUSTRIAL PARK REMODEL ❑ AMENDED NOTICE (File No Name Reference) ® City of Tigard Planning Director A copy of the said notice being hereto attached, marked Exhibit"A", and by reference made a part hereof, was mailed to each named person(s) at the address(s) shown on the attached list(s), marked Exhibit"B", and by reference made a part hereof, on lune 3,2002, and deposited in the United States Mail on June 3,2002, postage prepaid. (Person that Prepared Notice) STATE OE ov Go9V ) County of Washington )ss. City of Tigard ) Subscribed and sworn/affirmed before me on the (3 day of-- , 2002. OFFICIAL SEAL ` h a DIANE M JELDERKS NO tir)_�PUBLIC OF OREGON NOTARY PUBLIC-0REGON COMMISSION N .326578 My Commission Expires. /7/&_.3 MY COMMISSION IXPIRES SEPT.07,2003 NOTICE OF TYPE II DECISION SITE DEVELOPMENT REVIEW (SDR) 2002-00004 > '" Ili'� CITY OF TIGARD 741H AVE. INDUSTRIAL PARK REMODEL CommunityDevefopment Shaping Better Community 120 DAYS = 8/6/2002 SECTION I. APPLICATION SUMMARY FILE NAME: 74th AVE. INDUSTRIAL PARK REMODEL CASE NO.: Site Development Review (SDR) SDR2002-00004 PROPOSAL: The applicant is proposing to upgrade the existing shop/garage structure into a leaseable commercial/industrial space, which will consist of 2 small offices and a storage or light manufacturing area. The scope of the project will be performed within the existing building envelope. OWNER: Jim Castile APPLICANT: Same 15715 SW 74th Avenue Tigard, OR 97224 LOCATION: 15715 SW 74th Avenue; WCTM 2S112DC, Tax Lot 1500. ZONE: I-P: Industrial Park District. The I-p zoning district provides appropriate locations for combining light manufacturing, office and small-scale commercial uses, e.g., restaurants, personal services and fitness centers, in a campus-like setting. Only those light industrial uses with no off-site impacts, e.g., noise, glare, odor, vibration, are permitted in the I-P zone. In addition to mandatory site development review, design and development standards in the I-P zone have been adopted to insure that developments will be well-integrated, attractively landscaped, and pedestrian-friendly. APPLICABLE REVIEW CRITERIA: Community Development Code Chapters 18.360, 18.390, 18.530, 18.705, 18.725, 18.745, 18.755, 18.765, 18.790, 18.795 and 18.810. SECTION II. DECISION Notice is hereby given that the City of Tigard Community Development Director's designee has APPROVED the above request subject to certain conditions of approval. The findings and conclusions on which the decision is based are noted in Section VI. NOTICE OF TYPE II DECISION SDR2002-00004/74`"Ave.Industrial Park Remodel PAGE 1 OF 18 CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL THE FOLLOWING CONDITIONS SHALL BE SATISFIED PRIOR TO THE ISSUANCE OF SITE/BUILDING PERMITS: Submit evidence of complying with the following conditions to the Planning Division. Staff contact: Mathew Scheidegger. 1 . Provide a plan showing 5% of the total parking spaces reserved for carpool/vanpool use. 2. Provide a plan showing directional signs indicating the direction of the bicycle parking structure. 3. Provide a plan that shows a 2-stall bicycle rack designed according to Section 18.765.050.C. of the Tigard Development Code. THIS APPROVAL SHALL BE VALID FOR EIGHTEEN (18) MONTHS FROM THE EFFECTIVE DATE OF THIS DECISION. SECTION III. BACKGROUND INFORMATION Site History: The site was approved to be developed under SDR97-02, Site Development Review approval to allow the construction of a six (6) building, 33,520 square foot industrial park; and SLR97- 03, Sensitive Lands Review to allow land form alterations within the 100-year floodplain and wetlands. Vicinity Information: Property to the north and south are zoned Industrial Park; I-P. Property to the west is zoned Residential, 7 units per acre; R-7. The area is predominantly developed with industrial uses. Site Information and Proposal Description: The subject site contains approximately 5.55 acres and is developed with 5 industrial buildings. The western portion of the site contains both floodplain and wetland areas. The applicant is proposing to upgrade the existing shop/garage structure into a leaseable commercial/industrial space, which will consist of 2 small offices of 632 square feet and a storage or light manufacturing area of approximately 1,168 square feet. The scope of the project will be performed within the existing building envelope. SECTION IV. COMMENTS FROM PROPERTY OWNERS WITHIN 500 FEET No comments were received. SECTION V. SUMMARY OF APPLICABLE REVIEW CRITERIA A. Zoning Districts 18.520 (Commercial Zoning Districts) B. Applicable Development Code Standards 18.705 Access Egress and Circulation) 18.745 Landscaping and Screening) 18.755 Mixed Solid Waste and Recyclable Storage) 18.765 Off-Street parking and loading requirements) 18.780 Signs 18.790 Tree Removal) 18.795 Visual Clearance) C. Specific DR Approval Criteria 18.360 D. Street and Utility Improvement Standards 18.810 E. Impact Study 18.390 NOTICE OF TYPE II DECISION SDR2002-00004/74`"Ave.Industrial Park Remodel PAGE 2 OF 18 SECTION VI. APPLICABLE DEVELOPMENT CODE STANDARDS A. ZONIING DISTRICT Industrial Zoning District: Section 18.530.020 Lists the description of the Industrial Zoning Districts. The site is located in the I-P: Industrial Park District. Development Standards: Section 18.530.040.B States that Development standards in commercial zoning districts are contained in Table 18.530.2 below: TABLE 18.520.2 DEVELOPMENT STANDARDS IN INDUSTRIAL ZONES STANDARD I-P Proposed Minimum Lot Size None 241,758 sq.ft. -Detached unit - -Boarding,lodging,rooming house - Minimum Lot Width 50 ft 362 ft. Minimum Setbacks -Front yard 35 ft[6] 35 ft. -Side facing street on corner&through lots[1] 20 ft - -Side yard 0/50 ft.[3] 5 ft. --Rear yard 0/20 ft[3] 30 ft. -Distance between front of garage&property line abutting a public or private street. - 0/20 ft[3] Maximum Height 45 ft 20 ft. Maximum Site Coverage[2] 85% >85% Minimum Landscape Requirement 15% 65% As demonstrated in the table above, the applicant's plans comply with the dimensional standards of the I-P zone. FINDING: Based on the analysis above, the Development Standards criteria have been satisfied. B. APPLICABLE DEVELOPMENT CODE STANDARDS The Site development Review approval standards require that a development proposal be found to be consistent with the various standards of the Community Development Code. The applicable criteria in this case are Chapters 18.360, 18.390, 18.520, 18.705, 18.745, 18.755, 18.765, 18.775, 18.780, 18.790, 18.795, and 18.810. The proposal's consistency with these Code Chapters is reviewed in the following sections. Access, Egress and Circulation (18.705): Access plan: No building or other permit shall be issued until scaled plans are presented and approved as provided by this chapter that show how access, egress and circulation requirements are to be fulfilled. The applicant shall submit a site plan. The Director shall provide the applicant with detailed information about this submission requirement. The applicant has provided plans showing access, egress and circulation from SW 74th Avenue. Therefore, this standard has been satisfied. NOTICE OF TYPE II DECISION SDR2002-00004/74`"Ave.Industrial Park Remodel PAGE 3 OF 18 Joint access: Owners of two or more uses, structures, or parcels of land may agree to utilize jointly the same access and egress when the combined access and egress of both uses, structures, or parcels of land satisfies the combined requirements as designated in this title, provided: Satisfactory legal evidence shall be presented in the form of deeds, easements, leases or contracts to establish the joint use; and copies of the deeds, easements, leases or contracts are placed on permanent file with the City. No joint access is proposed at this time. Therefore, this standard does not apply. Public street access: All vehicular access and egress as required in Sections 18.705.030H and 18.705.0301 shall connect directly with a public or private street approved by the City for public use and shall be maintained at the required standards on a continuous basis. The proposed building is accessible from SW 74th Avenue, which is a public street that will be maintained as a public street. Curb cuts: Curb cuts shall be in accordance with Section 18.810.030N: Concrete curbs, curb cuts, wheelchair, bicycle ramps and driveway approaches shall be constructed in accordance with standards specified in this chapter and Section 15.04.080: Concrete curbs and driveway approaches are required; except where no sidewalk is planned, an asphalt approach may be constructed with City Engineer approval and Asphalt and concrete driveway approaches to the property line shall be built to City configuration standards. No driveway approach shall be less than five feet from the side property line projected except in cul-de-sacs, without approval and written permission of the city. The end slopes may encroach within the five foot restricted area. No portion of any driveway approach, including, the end slopes, shall be located closer than thirty feet to an intersection street right-of-way line. Commercial or service drives shall not be more than thirty feet in width and if located on the same lot frontage shall be separated by a minimum length of curb of thirty feet. Each residential driveway shall be not more than twenty-six feet in width includin end slopes, and if more than one driveway is to be constructed to serve the same lot, the frontage spacing between such driveways shall be not less than thirty feet measured along the curb line. Joint access driveways shall conform to the appropriate width standard for commercial or residential type usage. The driveway approach is pre-existing. Therefore, this standard does not apply. Walkways: On-site pedestrian walkways shall comply with the following standards: Walkways shall extend from the ground floor entrances or from the ground floor landing of stairs, ramps, or elevators of all commercial, institutional, and industrial uses, to the streets which provide the required access and egress. Walkways shall provide convenient connections between buildings in multi-building commercial, institutional, and industrial complexes. Unless impractical, walkways shall be constructed between new and existing developments and neighboring developments; According to the plans submitted, a concrete walkway will extend from the main entrance of the subject building to the existing walkway of building 'D," which extends to SW 74 h Avenue. Wherever required walkways cross vehicle access driveways or parking lots, such crossings shall be designed and located for pedestrian safety. Required walkways shall be physically separated from motor vehicle traffic and parking by either a minimum 6-inch vertical separation (curbed) or a minimum 3-foot horizontal separation, except that pedestrian crossings of traffic aisles are permitted for distances no greater than 36 feet if appropriate landscaping, pavement markings, or contrasting pavement materials are used. Walkways shall be a minimum of four feet in width, exclusive of vehicle overhangs and obstructions such as mailboxes, benches, bicycle racks, and sign posts, and shall be in compliance with ADA standards; NOTICE OF TYPE II DECISION SDR2002-00004/74`"Ave. Industrial Park Remodel PAGE 4 OF 18 The proposed walkway crosses a traffic aisle for a distance of exactly 36 feet. The proposed walkway will be striped with 18-inch white stripes. Therefore, this standard has been met. Required walkways shall be paved with hard surfaced materials such as concrete, asphalt, stone, brick, etc. Walkways may be required to be lighted and/or signed as needed for safety purposes. Soft-surfaced public use pathways may be provided only if such pathways are provided in addition to required pathways. The plan depicts that the proposed walkway that connects the subject building to the public right-of-way will be concrete, which meets the standard. Minimum Access Requirements for Commercial and Industrial Use: Section 18.705.030.1 provides the minimum access requirements for commercial and industrial uses: Table 18.705.3 indicates that the required access width for developments with 0-99 parking spaces is one 30-foot accesses with 24 feet of pavement. Vehicular access shall be provided to commercial or industrial uses, and shall be located to within 50 feet of the primary ground floor entrances; additional requirements for truck traffic may be placed as conditions of site development review. The development has two (2) points of access into the parking lot that are 30 feet wide with 30 feet of pavement. The above standard indicates that a 30-foot-wide access with 24 feet of payment is required. Therefore, this standard has been satisfied. One-way vehicular access points: Where a proposed parking facility indicates only one-way traffic flow on the site, it shall be accommodated by a specific driveway serving the facility; the entrance drive shall be situated closest to oncoming traffic and the exit drive shall be situated farthest from oncoming traffic. The entrance drives are designed for two-way traffic. Therefore, this standard does not apply. The Director has the authority to restrict access when the need to do so is dictated by one or more of the following conditions: To provide for increased traffic movement on congested streets and to eliminate turning movement problems, the Director may restrict the location of driveways on streets and require the location of driveways be placed on adjacent streets, upon the finding that the proposed access would: • Cause or increase existing hazardous traffic conditions; or • Provide inadequate access for emergency vehicles; or • Cause hazardous conditions to exist which would constitute a clear and present danger to the public health, safety, and general welfare. To eliminate the need to use public streets for movements between commercial or industrial properties, parking areas shall be designed to connect with parking areas on adjacent properties unless not feasible. The Director shall require access easements between properties where necessary to provide for parking area connections; To facilitate pedestrian and bicycle traffic, access and parking area plans shall provide efficient sidewalk and/or pathway connections, as feasible, between neighboring developments or land uses; The access points to the subject property are pre-existing and are not considered hazardous or constitute a clear and present danger to the public health. Therefore, no access restriction is required. FINDING: Based on the analysis above, the Access, Egress and Circulation standards have been met. NOTICE OF TYPE II DECISION SDR2002-00004/74'"Ave.Industrial Park Remodel PAGE 5 OF 18 Landscaping and Screening (18.745): Street Trees: Section 18.745.040 states that all development projects fronting on a public street or a private drive more than 100 feet in length shall be required to plant street trees in accordance with Section 18.745.040.0 Section 18.745.040.0 requires that street trees be spaced between 20 and 40 feet apart depending on the size classification of the tree at maturity (small, medium or large). Street trees are pre-existing, therefore, this standard is satisfied. Buffering and Screening: Section 18.745.080 states that no buffer is required between abutting uses that are of a different type when the uses are separated by a street. No buffer is required between a proposed office use and existing office use. This criterion is not applicable, as this proposal does not abut a use that requires buffering in accordance with the Buffer Matrix. Therefore, this standard does not apply. Screening: Special P-rovisions: Section 18.745.050.E requires the screening of parking and loading areas. Landscaped parking areas shall include special design features which effectively screen the parking lot areas from view. Planting materials to be installed should achieve a relative balance between low lying and vertical shrubbery and trees. Trees shall be planted in landscaped islands in all parking areas, and shall be equally distributed on the basis of one (1) tree for each seven (7) parking spaces in order to provide a canopy effect. The minimum dimension on the landscape islands shall be three (3) feet wide and the landscaping shall be protected from vehicular damage by some form of wheel guard or curb. The parking lot associated with the subject site is pre-existing. However, 4-parking stalls are proposed that are screened naturally by the abutting Fanno Creek to the east and a chain link fence with slats to the south. Therefore, this standard has been satisfied. Screening Of Service Facilities. Except for one-family and two-family dwellings, any refuse container or disposal area and service facilities such as gas meters and air conditioners which would otherwise be visible from a public street, customer or resident parking area, any public facility or any residential area shall be screened from view by placement of a solid wood fence or masonry wall between five and eight feet in height. All refuse materials shall be contained within the screened area; Screening of Service Facilities is addressed under Chapter 18.755 (Mixed Solid Waste and Recyclable Storage). FINDING: Based on the analysis above, the landscaping and screening standards have been met. Mixed Solid Waste and Recyclables Storage (18.755): Chapter 18.755 requires that new construction incorporates functional and adequate space for on-site storage and efficient collection of mixed solid waste and source separated Recyclables prior to pick-up and removal by haulers. The applicant must choose one (1) of the following four (4) methods to demonstrate compliance: Minimum Standard; Waste Assessment, Comprehensive Recyclin Plan, or Franchised Hauler Review and Sign-Off. The applicant will have to submit evidence or a plan which indicates compliance with this section. Regardless of which method chosen, the applicant will have to submit a written sign-off from the franchise hauler regarding the facility location and compatibility. The proposed tenants will utilize the existing onsite disposal storage facilities. The original disposal facilities were approved for the entire park, including building "F" (3,840 square feet) which was never constructed. Therefore, the proposed conversion of 1,800-square feet of storage shed to an office/warehouse will not generate more mixed solid waste or recyclables than what is already approved. NOTICE OF TYPE II DECISION SDR2002-00004/74'"Ave. Industrial Park Remodel PAGE 6 OF 18 Location Standards. To encourage its use, the storage area for source-separated recyclable shall be co- located with the storage area for residual mixed solid waste; Indoor and outdoor storage areas shall comply with Uniform Building and Fire Code requirements; Storage area space requirements can be satisfied with a single location or multiple locations, and can combine both interior and exterior locations; Exterior storage areas can be located within interior side yard or rear yard areas. Exterior storage areas shall not be located within a required front yard setback or in a yard adjacent to a public or private street; Exterior storage areas shall be located in central and visible locations on a site to enhance security for users; Exterior storage areas can be located in a parking area, if the proposed use provides at least the minimum number of parking spaces required for the use after deducting the area used for storage. Storage areas shall be appropriately screened according to the provisions in 18.755.050 C, design standards; The storage area shall be accessible for collection vehicles and located so that the storage area will not obstruct pedestrian or vehicle traffic movement on the site or on public streets adjacent to the site. The refuse container facility on the proposed site is pre-existing. Therefore, this standard does not apply. Design Standards. The dimensions of the storage area shall accommodate containers consistent with current methods of local collection; Storage containers shall meet Uniform Fire Code standards and be made and covered with waterproof materials or situated in a covered area; Exterior storage areas shall be enclosed by a sight-obscuring fence wall, or hedge at least six feet in height. Gate openings which allow access to users and haulers shall be provided. Gate openings for haulers shall be a minimum of 10 feet wide and shall be capable of being secured in a closed and open position; Storage area(s) and containers shall be clearly labeled to indicate the type of materials accepted. The refuse container facility on the proposed site is pre-existing. Therefore, this standard does not apply. FINDING: Based on the analysis above, the Mixed Solid Waste/Recycling Storage Standards have been met. Off-Street Parking and Loading (18.765): Location of vehicle parking: Off-street parking spaces for single-family and duplex dwellings and single-family attached dwellings shall be located on the same lot with the dwellings. Off-street parking lots for uses not listed above shall be located not further than 200 feet from the building or use that they are required to serve, measured in a straight line from the building with the following exceptions: a) commercial and industrial uses which require more than 40 parking spaces may provide for the spaces in excess of the required first 40 spaces up to a distance of 300 feet from the primary site; The 40 parking spaces which remain on the primary site must be available for users in the following order of priority: 1) Disabled-accessible spaces; 2) Short-term spaces; 3) Long-term preferential carpool and vanpool spaces; 4) Long-term spaces. In 1997, the applicant received approval for 6 buildings consisting of 33,024 square feet and was required to provide a minimum of 53 parking stalls. The site is currently developed with 5 buildings consisting of 32,068 square feet of warehouse/office space. With the addition of 632 square feet of office use and 1,168 square feet of warehouse use, current parking standards require a total of 28 parking stalls. The site plan indicates that 4 additional parking stalls will be provided for a total of 57 stalls. One of the proposed spaces is an ADA accessible stall. Therefore, this standard has been satisfied. NOTICE OF TYPE II DECISION SDR2002-00004/74`"Ave.Industrial Park Remodel PAGE 7 OF 18 Joint Parking_ Owners of two or more uses, structures or parcels of land may agree to utilize jointly the same parking and loading spaces when the peak hours of operation do not overlay, subject to the following: 1) The size of the joint parking facility shall be at least as large as the number of vehicle parking spaces required by the larger(est) use per Section 18.765.070; 2) Satisfactory legal evidence shall be presented to the Director in the form of deeds, leases or contracts to establish the joint use; 3) If a joint use arrangement is subsequently terminated, or if the uses change, the requirements of this title thereafter apply to each separately. Joint parking is not proposed with this application. Therefore, this standard does not apply. Parking in Mixed-Use Projects: In mixed-use projects, the required minimum vehicle parking shall be determined using the following formula. 1) Primary use, i.e., that with the largest proportion of total floor area within the development, at 100% of the minimum vehicle parking required for that use in Section 18.765.060; 2) Secondary use, i.e., that with the second largest percentage of total floor area within the development, at 90% of the vehicle parking required for that use in Section 18.765.060; 3) Subsequent use or uses, at 80% of the vehicle parking required for that use(s) in Section 18.765.060; 4) The maximum parking allowance shall be 150% of the total minimum parking as calculated in D.1.-3. above. The subject site is developed as a mixed-use project. However, the parking area for the site is pre-existinc and the applicant is proposing to add an additional 4 parking stalls, which is consistent wife the amount needed for the site. Therefore, this standard has been met. Visitor Parking in Multi-Family Residential Developments: Multi-dwelling units with more than 10 required parking spaces shall provide an additional 15% of vehicle parking spaces above the minimum required for the use of guests of residents of the complex. These spaces shall be centrally located or distributed throughout the development. Required bicycle parking facilities shall also be centrally located within or evenly distributed throughout the development. This project does not involve a multi-family use. Therefore, this standard does not apply. Preferential Long-Term CarpoolNanpool Parking: Parking lots providing in excess of 20 long-term parking spaces shall provide preferential long-term carpool and vanpool parking for employees, students and other regular visitors to the site. At least 5% of total long-term parking spaces shall be reserved for carpool/vanpool use. Preferential parking for carpools/vanpools shall be closer to the main entrances of the building than any other employee or student parking except parking spaces designated for use by the disabled. Preferential carpool/vanpool spaces shall be full-sized per requirements in Section 18.765.040N and shall be clearly designated for use only by carpools and vanpools between 7:00 AM and 5:30 PM Monday through Friday. The parking lot is developed with 53 parking stalls and the applicant is proposing to add an additional 4 parking stalls for a total 57 parking stalls. Therefore, the applicant is required to provide a plan showing 5% of the total parking spaces reserved for carpool/vanpool use. Disabled-Accessible Parking: All parking areas shall be provided with the required number of parking spaces for disabled persons as specified by the State of Oregon Uniform Building Code and federal standards. Such parking spaces shall be sized, signed and marked as required by these regulations. The subject parking area is proposed to have a total of 57 parking stalls. According to the State of Oregon Uniform Building Code and Federal standards, the parking lot is required to provide 3-ADA accessible parking stalls. With the proposed addition of 1-ADA parking stall the entire site will have a total of 4-ADA parking stalls. Therefore, this standard has been met. NOTICE OF TYPE II DECISION SDR2002-00004/74'"Ave. Industrial Park Remodel PAGE 8 OF 18 Access Drives: With regard to access to public streets from off-street parking: access drives from the street to off-street parking or loading areas shall be designed and constructed to facilitate the flow of traffic and provide maximum safety for pedestrian and vehicular traffic on the site,' the number and size of access drives shall be in accordance with the requirements of hapter, 18.705 Access Egress and Circulation; access drives shall be clearly and permanently marked and defined through use of rails, fences, walls or other barriers or markers on frontage not occupied by service drives; access drives shall have a minimum vision clearance in accordance with Chapter 18.795, Visual Clearance; access drives shall be improved with an asphalt or concrete surface; and excluding single-family and duplex residences, except as provided by Subsection 18.810.030.F, groups of two or more parking spaces shall be served by a service drive so that no backing movements or other maneuvering within a street or other public right-of-way will be required. The access drive has been addressed previously in this decision under Chapter 18.705 (Access Egress and Circulation). Pedestrian Access: Pedestrian access through parking lots shall be provided in accordance with Section 18.705.030.F. Where a parking area or other vehicle area has a drop-off grade separation, the property owner shall install a wall, railing, or other barrier which will prevent a slow-moving vehicle or driverless vehicle from escaping such area and which will prevent pedestrians from walking over drop-off edges. Pedestrian access has been discussed previously in this decision under Chapter 18.705 (Access Egress and Circulation). Parking Lot Striping: Except for single-family and duplex residences, any area intended to be used to meet the off-street parking requirements as contained in this Chapter shall have all parking spaces clearly marked; and all interior drives and access aisles shall be clearly marked and signed to show direction of flow and maintain vehicular and pedestrian safety. The plans submitted show the proposed parking spaces will be clearly marked with striping. Therefore, this standard has been satisfied. Wheel Stops: Parking spaces along the boundaries of a parking lot or adjacent to interior landscaped areas or sidewalks shall be provided with a wheel stop at least four inches high located three feet back from the front of the parking stall. The front three feet of the parking stall may be concrete, asphalt or low lying landscape material that does not exceed the height of the wheel stop. This area cannot be calculated to meet landscaping or sidewalk requirements. The proposed ADA accessible parking stall is the only stall abutting the boundary of the parcel. The site plan shows the parking stall equipped with a wheel stop. The 3-other parking stalls are interior stalls that do not abut interior landscaping. Therefore, this criterion has been met. Space and Aisle Dimensions: Section 18.765.040.N states that: "except as modified for angled parking in Figures 18.765.1 and 18.765.2 the minimum dimensions for parking spaces are: 8.5 feet x 18.5 feet for a standard space and 7.5 feet x 16.5 feet for a compact space; aisles accommodating two direction traffic, or allowing access from both ends, shall be 24 feet in width. The applicant's plans indicate that all 4-parking stalls will meet the minimum dimensions for standard parking stalls. Therefore, this standard has been satisfied. NOTICE OF TYPE II DECISION SDR2002-00004/74`"Ave.Industrial Park Remodel PAGE 9 OF 18 Bicycle Parking Location and Access: Section 18.765.050 states bicycle parking areas shall be provided at locations within 50 feet of primary entrances to structures; bicycle parking areas shall not be located within parking aisles, landscape areas or pedestrian ways; outdoor bicycle parking shall be visible from on-site buildings and/or the street. When the bicycle parking area is not visible from the street, directional signs shall be used to located the parking area; and bicycle parking may be located inside a building on a floor which has an outdoor entrance open for use and floor location which does not require the bicyclist to use stairs to gain access to the space. Exceptions may be made to the latter requirement for parking on upper stories within a multi-story residential building. According to Table 18.765.2 of the Tigard Development Code, the minimum bicycle-parking requirement for 632 square feet of office is 0.5 spaces per 1,000 square feet. The minimum bicycle-parking for 1,168 square feet of warehouse is 0.1 per 1,000 square feet. The table indicates a minimum of 2 bicycle parking stalls is required. The applicant has indicated that one bicycle-parking stall will be provided for the proposed conversion. However, the applicant is required to provide a plan showing a minimum of 2-bicycle parking stalls. The proposed bicycle parking area is approximately 38 feet from the primary entrance of the building. Because the bicycle parking cannot be seen from SW 74t Avenue, the applicant will be required to provide a plan showing signs indicating the direction of the bicycle parking structure. Bicycle Parking Design Requirements: Section 18.765050.C. The following_ design requirements apply to the installation of bicycle racks: The racks required -Tor required bicycle parking spaces shall ensure that bicycles may be securely locked to them without undue inconvenience. Provision of bicycle lockers for long-term (employee) parking is encouraged but not required; bicycle racks must be securely anchored to the ground, wall or other structure; bicycle parking spaces shall be at least 21/2 feet by six feet long, and, when covered with a vertical clearance of seven feet. An access aisle of at least five feet wide shall be provided and maintained beside or between each row of bicycle parking; each required bicycle parking space must be accessible without moving another bicycle; required bicycle parking spaces may not be rented or leased except where required motor vehicle parking is rented or leased. At-cost or deposit fees for bicycle parking are exempt from this requirement; and areas set aside for required bicycle parking must be clearly reserved for bicycle parking only. Outdoor bicycle parking facilities shall be surfaced with a hard surfaced material, i.e., pavers asphalt, concrete or similar material. This surface must be designed to remain well drained. The applicant has not provided a detail of the bike rack to be used, therefore, the applicant will be required to provide a plan that shows a 2-stall bicycle rack designed according to Section 18.765.050.C. of the Tigard Development Code. Minimum Bicycle Parking Requirements: The total number of required bicycle parking spaces for each use is specified in Table 18.765.2 in Section 18.765.070.H. In no case shall there be less than two bicycle parking spaces. As discussed above, according to Table 18.765.2 of the Tigard Development Code, the minimum bicycle-parking requirement for an office/warehouse use is 2 spaces, which has been conditioned above. Minimum Off-Street Parking: Section 18.765.070.H states that the minimum and maximum parking shall be as required in Table 18.765.2. Minimum parking has been addressed earlier in this section. Therefore, this standard has been met. NOTICE OF TYPE II DECISION SDR2002-00004/74`"Ave.Industrial Park Remodel PAGE 10 OF 18 Off-Street Loading Spaces: Commercial, industrial and institutional buildings or structures to be built or altered which receive and distribute material or merchandise by truck shall provide and maintain off-street loading and maneuvering space as follows: A minimum of one loading space is required for buildings with 10,000 gross square feet or more; A minimum of two loading spaces for buildings with 40,000 gross square feet or more. The proposal is for a 1 ,800 square foot conversion from a storage shed to an office/warehouse use. Therefore, no loading spaces for the distribution of materials by truck is necessary. FINDING: Based on the analysis above, the off-street parking and loading standards have not been fully met, however, if the applicant complies with the conditions listed below, the standards will be fully met: CONDITIONS: • Provide a plan showing 5% of the total parking spaces reserved for carpool/vanpool use. • Provide a plan showing directional signs indicating the direction of the bicycle parking structure. • Provide a plan that shows a 2 stall bicycle rack designed according to Section 18.765.050.C. of the Tigard Development Code. Signs (18.780): Chapter 18.780.130.D lists the type of allowable signs and sign area permitted in the MUE Zoning District. Signs are reviewed through a separate permit process administered by the Development Services Technicians. FINDING: Because signs will be reviewed and approved as part of a separate permit process, this standard has been satisfied. Tree Removal (18.790): Section 18.790.030 requires that a tree plan for the planting, removal and protection of trees prepared by a certified arborist shall be provided with a site development review application. The tree plan shall include identification of all existing trees, identification of a program to save existing trees or mitigate tree removal over 12 inches in caliper, which trees are to be removed, protection program defining standards and methods that will be used by the applicant to protect trees during and after construction. No trees are proposed to be removed by the applicant. Therefore, this standard does not apply. FINDING: Based on the analysis above, the tree removal standards have been fully met. Visual Clearance Areas (18.795): Chapter 18.795 requires that a clear vision area shall be maintained on the corners of all property adjacent to intersecting right-of-ways or the intersection of a public street and a private driveway. A clear vision area shall contain no vehicle, hedge, planting, fence, wall structure, or temporary or permanent obstruction exceeding three (3) feet in height. The code provides that obstructions that may be located in this area shall be visually clear between three (3) and eight (8) feet in height (8) (trees may be placed within this area provided that all branches below eight (8) feet are removed). A visual clearance area is the triangular area formed by measuring a 30-foot distance along the street right- of-way and the driveway, and then connecting these two (2), 30-foot distance points with a straight line. No modifications to the visual clearance at the access points of the site are being proposed with this application. Therefore, this standard does not apply. NOTICE OF TYPE II DECISION SDR2002-00004/74'"Ave.Industrial Park Remodel PAGE 11 OF 18 • FINDING: Based on the analysis above, the vision clearance standards have been met. C. SPECIFIC SITE DEVELOPMENT REVIEW APPROVAL STANDARDS Section 18.360.090(A)(2) through 18.360.090(A)(15) provides additional Site Development Review approval standards not necessarily covered by the provisions of the previously listed sections. These additional standards are addressed immediately below with the following exceptions: The proposal contains no elements related to the provisions of the following and are, therefore, found to be inapplicable as approval standards: 18.360.090.3 (Exterior Elevations);); 18.360.090.5 (Privacy and Noise: Multi-family or Group Living Uses); 18.360.090.6 (Private Outdoor Areas: Multi-family Use); 18.360.090.7 (Shared Outdoor Recreation Areas: Multi-family Use); 18.360.090.8 (100-year floodplain); and 18.360.090.9 (Demarcation of Spaces). The following sections were discussed previously in this decision and, therefore, will not be addressed in this section: 18.360.090.4 (Buffering, Screening and Compatibility Between Adjoining Uses; 18.360.090.13 (Parking); 18.360.090.14 (Landscaping); and 18.360.090.14 (Provision for the Disabled). Relationship to the Natural and Physical Environment: Buildings shall be: located to preserve existing trees, topography and natural drainage where possible based upon existing site conditions; located in areas not subject to ground slumping or sliding; located to provide adequate distance between adjoining buildings for adequate light, air circulation, and fire-fighting; and oriented with consideration for sun and wind. Trees shall be preserved to the extent possible. Replacement of trees is subject to the requirements of Chapter 18.790, Tree Removal. According to the applicant, the proposed building will have no impact on existing trees located on the site. Drainage is addressed later in this decision under Chapter 18.810 (Street and Utility Improvement Standards). The proposed subject building is approximately 65 feet from the nearest building also located on the subject parcel, thus providing adequate light, air circulation, and fire-fighting access. Trees have been addressed earlier under Chapter 18.790. Crime Prevention and Safety: • Windows shall be located so that areas vulnerable to crime can be surveyed by the occupants; • Interior laundry and service areas shall be located in a way that they can be observed by others; • Mail boxes shall be located in lighted areas having vehicular or pedestrian traffic; • The exterior lighting levels shall be selected and the angles shall be oriented towards areas vulnerable to crime; and • Light fixtures shall be provided in areas having heavy pedestrian or vehicular traffic and in potentially dangerous areas such as parking lots, stairs, ramps and abrupt grade changes. Fixtures shall be placed at a height so that light patterns overlap at a height of seven feet, which is sufficient to illuminate a person. The applicant's plans indicate 7 windows located on the south side of the proposed building, 2 windows on the east side, 2 windows on the west side 2 on the north side. Outdoor surface lighting will be provided on the north and south sides of the building. NOTICE OF TYPE II DECISION SDR2002-00004/74'"Ave.Industrial Park Remodel PAGE 12 OF 18 Public Transit: Provisions within the plan shall be included for providing for transit if the development proposal is adjacent to existing or proposed transit route; the requirements for transit facilities shall be based on: the location of other transit facilities in the area; and the size and type of the proposal. The following facilities may be required after City and Tri-Met review: bus stop shelters; turnouts for buses; and connecting paths to the shelters. The site has frontage on SW 74th Avenue, which is not a Tri-Met transit route. Therefore, this standard does not apply. Provisions of the Underlying Zone: All of the provisions and regulations of the underlying zone shall apply unless modified by other sections or this title, e.g., Planned Developments, Chapter 18.350; or a variance or adjustment granted under Chapter 18.370. Dimensional Requirements: Provisions of the (I-P) Industrial Park Zoning District have been addressed earlier in this decision under Section 18.530.040.B. FINDING: Based on the analysis above, the specific standards of the Site Development Review Section have been met. D. Street And Utility Improvements Standards (Section 18.810): Chapter 18.810 provides construction standards for the implementation of public and private facilities and utilities such as streets, sewers, and drainage. The applicable standards are addressed below: Streets: Improvements: Section 18.810.030.A.1 states that streets within a development and streets adjacent shall be improved in accordance with the TDC standards. Section 18.810.030.A.2 states that any new street or additional street width planned as a portion of an existing street shall be dedicated and improved in accordance with the TDC. Minimum Rights-of-Way and Street Widths: Section 18.810.030(E) requires a local residential street to have a 50-foot right-of-way width and a 32-foot paved section. Other improvements required may include on-street parking, sidewalks and bikeways, underground utilities, street lighting, storm drainage, and street trees. No additional right-of-way dedications or improvements are required. Therefore, this section does not apply. Sidewalks: Section 18.810.070.A requires that sidewalks be constructed to meet City design standards and be located on both sides of arterial, collector and local residential streets. Sidewalks are pre-existing. Therefore, no additional sidewalks will be required. Sanitary Sewers: Sewers Required: Section 18.810.090.A requires that sanitary sewer be installed to serve each new development and to connect developments to existing mains in accordance with the provisions set forth in Design and Construction Standards for Sanitary and Surface Water Management (as adopted by Clean Water Services in 1996 and including any future revisions or amendments) and the adopted policies of the comprehensive plan. NOTICE OF TYPE II DECISION SDR2002-00004/74"'Ave. Industrial Park Remodel PAGE 13 OF 18 Over-sizing: Section 18.810.090.0 states that proposed sewer systems shall include consideration of additional development within the area as projected by the Comprehensive Plan. Existing onsite utilities are sufficient for the additional impact on the site. Therefore, this standard is satisfied. Storm Drainage: General Provisions: Section 18.810.100.A states requires developers to make adequate provisions for storm water and flood water runoff. Accommodation of Upstream Drainage: Section 18.810.100.0 states that a culvert or other drainage facility shall be large enough to accommodate potential runoff from its entire upstream drainage area, whether inside or outside the development. The City Engineer shall approve the necessary size of the facility, based on the provisions of Design and Construction Standards for Sanitary and Surface Water Management (as adopted by Clean Water Services in 2000 and including any future revisions or amendments). The sites adjacent to this site are fully developed. No upstream flows impact this site. Effect on Downstream Drainage: Section 18.810.100.D states that where it is anticipated by the City Engineer that the additional runoff resulting from the development will overload an existing drainage facility, the Director and Engineer shall withhold approval of the development until provisions have been made for improvement of the potential condition or until provisions have been made for storage of additional runoff caused by the development in accordance with the Design and Construction Standards for Sanitary and Surface Water Management (as adopted by Clean Water Services in 2000 and including any future revisions or amendments). In 1997, Clean Water Services (CWS) completed a basin study of Fanno Creek and adopted the Fanno Creek Watershed Management Plan. Section V of that plan includes a recommendation that local governments institute a stormwater detention/effective impervious area reduction program resulting in no net increase in storm peak flows up to the 25-year event. The City will require that all new developments resulting in an increase of impervious surfaces provide onsite detention facilities, unless the development is located adjacent to Fanno Creek. For those developments adjacent to Fanno Creek, the storm water runoff will be permitted to discharge without detention. The site is fully developed with an existing facility that still has excess capacity. No increase of impervious surfaces is proposed. Therefore, this standard does not apply. Bikeways and Pedestrian Pathways: Bikeway Extension: Section 18.810.110.A states that developments adjoining proposed bikeways identified on the City's adopted pedestrian/bikeway plan shall include provisions for the future extension of such bikeways through the dedication of easements or right-of-way. A 15-foot easement was recorded with the original Site Development Review (SDR97-02). Therefore, no additional dedication for bikeways is required. Cost of Construction: Section 18.810.110.B states that development permits issued for planned unit developments, conditional use permits, subdivisions, and other developments which will principally benefit from such bikeways shall be conditioned to include the cost or construction of bikeway improvements. No bikeways are associated with this project. Therefore, this criterion does not apply. Minimum Width: Section 18.810.110.0 states that the minimum width for bikeways within the roadway is five feet per bicycle travel lane. Minimum width for two-way bikeways separated from the road is eight feet. NOTICE OF TYPE II DECISION SDR2002-00004/74`"Ave. Industrial Park Remodel PAGE 14 OF 18 No bikeways are associated with this project. Therefore, this criterion does not apply. Utilities: Section 18.810.120 states that all utility lines, but not limited to those required for electric, communication lighting and cable television services and related facilities shall be placed underground, except for surface mounted transformers, surface mounted connection boxes and meter cabinets which may be placed above ground, temporary utility service facilities during construction, high capacity electric lines operating at 50,000 volts or above, and: • The developer shall make all necessary arrangements with the serving utility to provide the underground services; • The City reserves the right to approve location of all surface mounted facilities; • All underground utilities, including sanitary sewers and storm drains installed in streets by the developer, shall be constructed prior to the surfacing of the streets; and • Stubs for service connections shall be long enough to avoid disturbing the street improvements when service connections are made. Exception to Under-Grounding Requirement: Section 18.810.120.0 states that a developer shall pay a fee in-lieu of under-groundin costs when the development is proposed to take place on a street where existing utilities which are not underground will serve the development and the approval authority determines that the cost and technical difficulty of under-grounding the utilities outweighs the benefit of under-grounding in conjunction with the development. The determination shall be on a case-by-case basis. The most common, but not the only, such situation is a short frontage development for which under-grounding would result in the placement of additional poles, rather than the removal of above-ground utilities facilities. An applicant for a development which is served by utilities which are not underground and which are located across a public right-of-way from the applicant's property shall pay a fee in-lieu of under-grounding. No under-grounding of utility lines is required with this application. Therefore, this standard does not apply. ADDITIONAL CITY AND/OR AGENCY CONCERNS WITH STREET AND UTILITY IMPROVEMENT STANDARDS: Public Water System: The site is served off existing water lines from SW 74th Avenue. Therefore, this standard is satisfied. Storm Water Quality: The City has agreed to enforce Surface Water Management (SWM) regulations established by Clean Water Services (CWS) Design and Construction Standards (adopted by Resolution and Order No. 00-7) which require the construction of on-site water quality facilities. The facilities shall be designed to remove 65 percent of the phosphorus contained in 100 percent of the storm water runoff generated from newly created impervious surfaces. In addition, a maintenance plan shall be submitted indicating the frequency and method to be used in keeping the facility maintained through the year. No additional onsite water quality improvements are needed. The existing facility still has excess capacity. Grading and Erosion Control: CWS Design and Construction Standards also regulate erosion control to reduce the amount of sediment and other pollutants reaching the public storm and surface water system resulting from development, construction, grading, excavating, clearing, and any other activity which accelerates erosion. Per CWS regulations, the applicant is required to submit an erosion control plan for City review and approval prior to issuance of City permits. NOTICE OF TYPE II DECISION SDR2002-00004/74`"Ave.Industrial Park Remodel PAGE 15 OF 18 The Federal Clean Water Act requires that a National Pollutant Discharge Elimination System (NPDES) erosion control permit be issued for any development that will disturb five or more acres of land. Since this site is over five acres, the developer will be required to obtain an NPDES permit from the City prior to construction. This permit will be issued along with the site and/or building permit. No grading is proposed. Therefore, this standard does not apply. E. IMPACT STUDY (18.390) Section 18.360.090 states, "The Director shall make a finding with respect to each of the following criteria when approving, approving with conditions or denying an application:" Section 18.390.040 states that the applicant shall provide an impact study to quantify the effect of development on public facilities and services. For each public facility system and type of impact, the study shall propose improvements necessary to meet City standard, and to minimize the impact of the development on the public at large, public facilities systems, and affected private property users. In situations where the Community Development Code requires the dedication of real property interests, the applicant shall either specifically concur with a requirement for public right-of-way dedication, or provide evidence that supports that the real property dedication is not roughly proportional to the projected impacts of the development. Section 18.390.040 states that when a condition of approval requires the transfer to the public of an interest in real property, the approval authority shall adopt findings which support the conclusion that the interest in real property to be transferred is roughly proportional to the impact the proposed development will have on the public. The applicant has provided an impact study addressing the project's impacts on public systems. The Washington County Traffic Impact Fee (TIF) is a mitigation measure that is required at the time of development. Based on a transportation impact study prepared by Mr. David Larson for the A-Boy Expansion/Dolan II/Resolution 95-61, TIF's are expected to recapture 32 percent of the traffic impact of new development on the Collector and Arterial Street system. The applicant will be required to pay TIF's of approximately $3,371 based on the use proposed. Based on the estimate that total TIF fees cover 32 percent of the impact on major street improvements citywide, a fee that would cover 100 percent of this projects traffic impact is $10,534 ($3,371 divided by .32). The difference between the TIF paid, and the full impact, is considered the unmitigated impact on the collector and arterial street system. The unmitigated impact of this project on the transportation system is $7,163. However, no exaction's are required. Therefore, the rough proportionality test is met. SECTION VII. OTHER STAFF COMMENTS The City of Tigard Long Range Planning Department has reviewed the proposal and has offered the following comments. If there is to be any external work (parking, landscaping, etc.) fencing should be installed to delineate the wetland buffer before any site work begins. Property abuts Fanno Creek and is within the Fanno Creek trail corridor. The City of Tigard Public Works Department has reviewed the proposal and has no objections to it. The City of Tigard Operations Manager has reviewed the proposal and has no objections to it. NOTICE OF TYPE II DECISION SDR2002-00004/74`"Ave.Industrial Park Remodel PAGE 16 OF 18 The City of Tigard Police Department has reviewed the proposal and has offered the following comments: • Request lighting plan for exterior of proposed development. The City of Tigard Building Division has reviewed the proposal and has offered the following comments: • We have questions regarding ADA restrooms serving the entire complex. Unisex restrooms are limited to 15 occupants. SECTION VIII. AGENCY COMMENTS Tualatin Valley Fire and Rescue has reviewed the proposal and has offered the following comments: I have reviewed the submittal for the above named project and have the following comments: 1. A minimum of 1 fire hydrant shall be provided for this development It shall be located so that no part of the structure is more than 250 feet from the fire hydrant. (UFC 903.4) 2. Fire hydrant locations shall be identified by the installation of reflective markers. The markers shall be blue. They shall be located adjacent and to the side of the centerline of the access roadway that the fire hydrant is located on. In case that there is no center line, then assume a centerline, and place the reflectors accordingly. (UFC Sec. 901 .4.3) SECTION IX. PROCEDURE AND APPEAL INFORMATION Notice: Notice was posted at City Hall and mailed to: X The applicant and owners X Owner of record within the required distance X Affected government agencies Final Decision: THIS DECISION IS FINAL ON JUNE 3, 2002 AND BECOMES EFFECTIVE ON JUNE 18, 2002 UNLESS AN APPEAL IS FILED. Appeal: The decision of the Director (Type II Procedure) or Review Authority (Type II Administrative Appeal or Type Ill Procedure) is final for purposes of appeal on the date that it is mailed. Any party with standing as provided in Section 18.390.040.G.1. may appeal this decision in accordance with Section 18.390.040.G.2. of the Tigard Community Development Code which provides that a written appeal together with the required fee shall be filed with the Director within ten (10) business days of the date the notice of the decision was mailed. The appeal fee schedule and forms are available from the Planning Division of Tigard City Hall, 13125 SW Hall Boulevard, Tigard, Oregon 97223. NOTICE OF TYPE II DECISION SDR2002-00004/74`"Ave.Industrial Park Remodel PAGE 17 OF 18 Unless th be.confine applicant . Of !n9 the d tO the !s the appellant, rules le s he be s is he ppell n, the hearing procedure that Additio entified �ng on a hat may Bess any pavidenC�the w an pea/fro T HE DEAD�tN adapted f°m tirne� the ap ingc�sMs comments submitted pe . Questions: E FOIE FtI.tNG q to tune by hhearing,r:SPtlebrilleCrta sea!n the pa�hall 73YOU have NAPPEA` /SAT pelae boto any t M�No�;Ces 25 S any S.ppPMON UN al w Hal/Boulevard s p/ease E 17 Tl9ara Oregon City of T; 2p02 t(503)639 41d Planning Divi PREP --:sue sloe' Tl9ara City Hall, AR• • ir. .�/�, =th_w _ Assistant Plann gger June 3 DA 7- - E APPRQVED y.. Richard I Planning Mangy ersdorff I�ticurpin mat Manager hek'lsdrlsD June �' R2oo2_0000a dec.dor 42682 ATE NOTICE OF TYPE 8 DECISION SDR2002 00a04/Zq fh Ave.industrial Pad Remode/ PAGE 18OF18 Illikfir) / -3. _, -ou 2\ CITY of TIGARD GEOGRAPHIC INFORMATION SYSTEM v- Illire . Ill \- VICINITY MAP REDWOOD LN )-------- Illeaaii IV 174111 or i SDR2002-00004 ..E. ma :. • .-D k um 1111111111k to III .NIIIIIIIIw _tir . 74TH AVENUE 1.=, A.1.1-17RD S' 0( \I I I I C17 P... '< INDUSTRIAL PARK 1 1 . g CKABLE LN . REMODEL I ..i_i___ \ , e c 0 .-J III NM 0 pin 1.11 tgr II= \ > I f 1 1 '■ k, .4: ■ 0 E \...._ . . , J: . ill A 11 ---- -I I- 0 L.1.1 -.1 Ill N •J--- '' ■ ._t ct..4... , 7 ,1: jpi- I ____ 1 I *Ltilik 0 00 F' .. , , 11111111.11111 Rc' B4F. 0- IP , Li %,To 1 c" Tigard Plea Map I' y 0 0 1 11 11 0 40 A r. zr li N 0 a • I 000 2001,...14.,.:::feet Feet '0 CO k.9/1„ '< ,c S ••■■ N. 0 04.4,_ AD, .,..,A, :sitypiosff Tigard -'ib / • ,• nl formstion on map or general location only and should be verified with the Development Services Division. 074: 13125 SW Hall Blvd Tigard,OR 97223 NnC, http:/hromv5°3)63.ci("tigairdnor us 'Community Development Plot date:Apr 15,2002;CAmagic\MAGIC03.APR I I I I I• FLOOD PLAN 1 I ! BOUNDARY LINE / / : I • / l t 0h 1 1: ji / I: EXTG.CARE 1 / TAKERS RESIDENCE • e - 1, I ! 1 9 9 NEW ACCESSIBLE ROUTE • i• - 9 TO CONNECT TO EXISTING I 20'-0" 20'-0" A.C. I �� \\"\"\` 2 SPACES AT 20' • 40' PAVEMENT ROUTE I• ACCESSIBLE 36'-0" \\/\��PANTED ROUTE a _is '; 'T s `9 EXTG. i i , I 9 11116-18"WIDE PAINTED EXI ING f CATCH J L J = W / :r U 0 STRIPES(WHITE) ROU \ .D BASIN OFFICE WAREHOUSE WAREHOUSE OFFICE Q_ o 1 316 SF MANUF. / MANUF. 316 SF a .i— P A R K I N Cs D A T A 584 SF. 5aa SF. NEW AC.• SIDEWALK THE FOLLOWING "USE" AREAS HAVE BEEN — FROM TOILET ASSUMED IN ORDER TO ESTIMATE IN BEST ROOM TO 1 JUDGMENT,THE NECESSARY PARKING „,12'-0"/ 43'-0" ,12'-0"/ EXISTING EXISTING } SPACES REQUIRED �CB. ROUTE. 1 ¢�'-0" 5l'-4" EXTG OFFICE 2 SPACES - i.„--- �`\ 1 BLDG. 'D' 632 SF.ASSUMED 9 • EXTG.WATER 1 } 632 / 1000 = .63 x 2.10 = 1.1 m I QUALITY I I Ii FACILITY ; A.C. T WAREHOUSE /MANUF. I SPACES - t PAVEMENT PROPOSED 1,168 SF.ASSUMED - , NEW RESTROOM 1,168/I,000 = 12 x 030 = 35 TOTAL SPACES 3 SPACES TOTAL SPACES PROVIDED4 I STANDARD AT START RA SPA E OR W SP 2 PARALLEL I I DISABLED CITY .L, (ITT OF TIGARD t SDR2002-00004 Of SITE PLAN N 74TH AVENUE INDUSTRIAL PARK REMODEL (Map is not to scale) EMU . _, Jim Castile 74th SDR2002-00004 15715 SW 74 Avenue 74TH AVENUE INDUSTRIAL PARK Tigard, OR 97224 74th Avenue Industrial Park LLC 8100 SW Durham Road Tigard, OR 97224 ---4--- -- . t gl A 1 i k x -t, I *.... . .\n- 1t.c, ..... , c,) 1 I k 1 4110 . _ ..... 0,0 .....__.....___,..._—___.___ ci CITY OF 1, ::- PM f.) ---------- ,...-----._ CURRENT PLANNING :-- 13 JUN r‘`) ...------------__ . 1 13125 SW HALL BLVD TIGARD, OR 97223 .... . -01600 a ( DUNCA OHN ARTHUR AND JANICE LEE 7060 SW PALMER WAY BEAVERTON,OR 97007 DUNCOoci 970073010 1401 17 06/11/02 FORWARD TIME EXP RTN TO SEND DUNCAN 8321 NW RIDGETOP CT PORTLAND OR 97229-80o3 RETURN TO SENDER ,3-1,665,,;;•.spi'a-7--? I i H i li t i i 1!! i !i 1 I H i I 1 hillinillifillutliiiltitinhlidildilidil J -41, ...... IzzivA k. Xil. \k. 4% .1: .-_Q.-_ "---..........zz....Z) i izb G2.70 , CITY OF TIGARD ;. k 1` CURRENT PLANNING 13125 SW HALL BLVD AN � TIGARD, OR 97223 _ _ �_ �_____� � 2S113AB-0 00 DUNCAN 4OHN A AND JANICE LE-7.- 7060 SW PALMER WAY BEAVERTON,OR 97007 I DUNC060 970072031 1401 16 06/06!02 FORWARD TIME EXP RTN TO SEND DUNCAN 8321 NW RIDGETOP CT PORTLAND OR 97229-5063 RETURN TO SENDER ?r? . V 4 ti,l„i,„l„I,l„i,l„I I,I„i,r •fi,i„l,i„i,rl,i,l,l„rll,f ,„...4,i AFFIDAVIT OF MAILING CITY OFTIGARD Community(Development ShapingA Better Community I, Patricia L. Lunford, being first duly sworn/affirm, on oath depose and say that I am a Senior Administrative Specialist for the City of J Bare Washington County, Oregon and that I served the following: (Check Appropriate Box(s)Below) E3 NOTICE OF PENDING LAND USE APPLICATION FOR: SDR2002-00004/74T" AVENUE INDUSTRIAL PARK REMODEL IDAMENDED NOTICE (File No./Name Reference) ® City of Tigard Planning Director A copy of the said notice being hereto attached, marked Exhibit"A", and by reference made a part hereof, was mailed to each named person(s) at the address(s) shown on the attached list(s), marked Exhibit"B",and by reference made a part hereof, on April 1l,2002,and deposited in the United States Mail on April 17,2002, postage prepaid. I I / / ` AIPAI 1 (Perso h- 're•irrd Notic; STATE of OcR,EGOAr ) County o�ff Washington )ss. City of Tigard ) Subscribed and sworn/affirmed before me on the 31, sit- day of , 2002. I;t;,•, OFFICIAL SEAL d, y i / ,: :,00: DIANE M JELDERKS re— / / !'% ' NOTARY PUBLIC-OREGON ' I t ' ' ' I r I I ' IV " COMMISSION NO.326578 MY COMMISSION EXPIRES SEPT.07,2003 My Commission Expires: �EXHI' NOTICE TO MORTGAGEE, LIENHOLDER,VENDOR OR SELLER: THE TIGARD DEVELOPMENT CODE REQUIRES THAT IF YOU RECEIVE THIS NOTICE,IT SHALL BE PROMPTLY FORWARDED TO THE PURCHASER. NOTICE OF PENDING LAND USE APPLICATION SITE DEVELOPMENT REVIEW � CITY OF OF TIGARD Community Deve(opment ShapingA Better Community DATE OF NOTICE: April 17, 2002 FILE NUMBER: SITE DEVELOPMENT REVIEW (SDR) 2002-00004 Type II Land Use Application FILE NAME: 74TH AVENUE INDUSTRIAL PARK REMODEL PROPOSAL: The applicant is proposing to upgrade the existing shop/garage structure into a leaseable commercial/industrial space, which will consist of 2 small offices and a storage or light manufacturing area. The scope of the project will be performed within the existing building envelope. ZONE: I-P: Industrial Park District. The I-P zoning district provides appropriate locations for combining light manufacturing, office and small-scale commercial uses, e.g., restaurants, personal services and fitness centers, in a campus-like setting. Only those light industrial uses with no off-site impacts, e.g., noise, glare, odor, vibration, are permitted in the I-P zone. In addition to mandatory site development review, design and development standards in the I-P zone have been adopted to insure that developments will be well-integrated, attractively landscaped, and pedestrian-friendly. APPLICABLE REVIEW CRITERIA: Community Development Code Chapters 18.360, 18.390, 18.530, 18.705, 18.725, 18.745, 18.755, 18.765, 18.790, 18.795 and 18.810. LOCATION: 15715 SW 74`h Avenue; WCTM 2S112DC, Tax Lot 1500. YOUR RIGHT TO PROVIDE WRITTEN COMMENTS: Prior to the City making any decision on the Application, you are hereby provided a fourteen (14) day period to submit written comments on the application to the City. THE FOURTEEN (14) DAY PERIOD ENDS AT 5:00 PM ON MAY 1, 2002. All comments should be directed to Mathew Scheidegger, Assistant Planner in the Planning Division at the City of Tigard, 13125 SW Hall Boulevard, Tigard, Oregon 97223. You may reach the City of Tigard by telephone at (503) 639-4171. ALL COMMENTS MUST BE RECEIVED BY THE CITY OF TIGARD IN WRITING PRIOR TO 5:00 PM ON THE DATE SPECIFIED ABOVE IN ORDER FOR YOUR COMMENTS TO BE CONSIDERED IN THE DECISION MAKING PROCESS THE CITY OF TIGARD APPRECIATES RECEIVING COMMENTS AND VALUES YOUR INPUT. COMMENTS WILL BE CONSIDERED AND ADDRESSED WITHIN THE NOTICE OF DECISION. A DECISION ON THIS ISSUE IS TENTATIVELY SCHEDULED FOR MAY 14, 2002. IF YOU PROVIDE COMMENTS, YOU WILL BE SENT A COPY OF THE FULL DECISION ONCE IT HAS BEEN RENDERED. WRITTEN COMMENTS WILL BECOME A PART OF THE PERMANENT PUBLIC RECORD AND SHALL CONTAIN THE FOLLOWING INFORMATION: • Address the specific "Applicable Review Criteria" described in the section above or any other criteria believed to be applicable to this proposal; • Raise any issues and/or concerns believed to be important with sufficient evidence to allow the City to provide a response; • Comments that provide the basis for an appeal to the Tigard Hearings Officer must address the relevant approval criteria with sufficient specificity on that issue. Failure of any party to address the relevant approval criteria with sufficient specificity may preclude subsequent appeals to the Land Use Board of Appeals or Circuit Court on that issue. Specific findings directed at the relevant approval criteria are what constitute relevant evidence. AFTER THE 14 DAY COMMENT PERIOD CLOSES, THE DIRECTOR SHALL ISSUE A TYPE II ADMINISTRATIVE DECISION. THE DIRECTOR'S DECISION SHALL BE MAILED TO THE APPLICANT AND TO OWNERS OF RECORD OF PROPERTY LOCATED WITHIN 500 FEET OF THE SUBJECT SITE, AND TO ANYONE ELSE WHO SUBMITTED WRITTEN COMMENTS OR WHO IS OTHERWISE ENTITLED TO NOTICE. THE DIRECTOR'S DECISION SHALL ADDRESS ALL OF THE RELEVANT APPROVAL CRITERIA. BASED UPON THE CRITERIA AND THE FACTS CONTAINED WITHIN THE RECORD, THE DIRECTOR SHALL APPROVE, APPROVE WITH CONDITIONS OR DENY THE REQUESTED PERMIT OR ACTION. SUMMARY OF THE DECISION-MAKING PROCESS: • The application is accepted by the City • Notice is sent to property owners of record within 500 feet of the proposed development area allowing a 14-day written comment period. ♦ The application is reviewed by City Staff and affected agencies. ♦ City Staff issues a written decision. • Notice of the decision is sent to the Applicant and all owners or contract purchasers of record of the site; all owners of record of property located within 500 feet of the site, as shown on the most recent property tax assessment roll; any City-recognized neighborhood group whose boundaries include the site; and any governmental agency which is entitled to notice under an intergovernmental agreement entered into with the City which includes provision for such notice or anyone who is otherwise entitled to such notice. INFORMATION/EVIDENCE AVAILABLE FOR REVIEW: The application, written comments and supporting documents relied upon by the Director to make this decision are contained within the record and are available for public review at the City of Tigard Community Development Department. Copies of these items may be obtained at a cost of $.25 per page or the current rate charged for this service. Questions regarding this application should be directed to the Planning Staff indicated on the first page of this Notice under the section titled "Your Right to Provide Written Comments." Ik;' / - 11.11t;. --_ VICINITY MAP arm 1111-111 rail:1 ==.... = I� SDR2002-00004 dii C2 III -NEM w ft. g 74TH AVENUE `6111111 g �.IMIN N INDUSTRIAL PARK _ �.j GABLE . REMODEL ~`,� ,.: / < 9 Q O` a X111111 -..9.,-/c:L. - , • 111111 W 5�� .)i.;: _ --�_� 4 ■111111 I - - \ - .t !AIiii 1 U11111111111r 1 s , = $C TIMC M..4T i , H I.4 1 �9_ III t k . syP� 1 / City Alk of Timed ifo mrmnm.n.o r.yr Sr semi Moil=.y r rrOnrAr Vr-' AO Ain*811 MB w9 N 10~•..Alta. 2S11200-01500 • 2S1120D-07900 74TH AVENUE INDUSTRIAL PARK LLC DANCHOK INVESTMENT GROUP INC 8100 SW DURHAM RD 8475 SW ERNST RD TIGARD,OR 97224 PORTLAND,OR 97225 2S 11200-00701 S 112CD-08300 BLACKWELL JAY M&TRACI N bA OK INVEST • • GROUP INC 15950 SW 76TH 8475 S A u: 'D TIGARD, OR 97224 ••RTLAND,OR • 5 2S 112CD-00700 2S 112CD-09100 BOUMAN DONNA L L• • OK INVEST • • GROUP INC 15940 SW 76TH AVE 8475 SW 'o•.• 'D TIGARD,OR 97224 •.' AND,OR 9 2S112DC-01600 2S112CD-08100 BOWLES JOHN MARGARET OK INVESTMENT G OUP INC 8986 SW ARAPAHO RD 8475 SW ER TUALATIN,OR 97062 ND,OR 9722 2S1 12C D-07300 2S 112C D-08700 BRANSON GREGORY L&LESLIE H • HOK INVESTME " 'OUP INC 15838 SW 76TH AVE 8475 SW ' TIGARD,OR 97224 P•' • '.,OR • 2S 11200-08600 2S 112C D-07800 CARICO SUSAN E D• •' •• NVESTMENT OUP INC 7570 SW ONNAF CT 8475 SW ERN •i TIGARD,OR 97224 • I•ND,OR 97225 2S 112D0-00200 2S1 120 D-08000 CATELLUS DEVELOPMENT CORPORATION •• .-•K INVESTMENT GROUP INC PROPERTY TAX DEPARTMENT 8475 S A :►���' 201 MISSION ST •RTLAND,OR 972 •• SAN FRANCISCO, CA 94105 -.11200-00201 2S 11200-03200 CA • LUS DEVELOPME '.-'ORATION DAVIS EDWARD L PROPE"A TAX D •-'TMENT 20375 SW 93RD AVE 2_011 MISS s T TUALATIN,OR 97062 K FRANCISCO, - ; 94105 2S 112CD-00200 2S 113AB-00800 CHRISTENSEN PHILLIP E AND DUNCAN JOHN A AND SALLY C JANICE LEE 15685 SW 76TH AVE 7060 SW PALMER WAY TIGARD,OR 97224 BEAVERTON,OR 97007 2S 112CD-03000 2S 113AB-01600 CUNNINGHAM RONALD R&ANNE C DUNCAN JOHN ARTHUR AND 7685 SW BOND JANICE LEE TIGARD,OR 97224 7060 SW PALMER WAY BEAVERTON,OR 97007 2S112C11-07400 ' 2S112CA-13200 ERDMANN LENNY G&CAROL A HOLZGANG CHRISTOPHER R& 15854 SW 76TH AVE MARY ANN TIGARD,OR 97224 15508 SW 76TH AVE TIGARD,OR 97224 2S 112CD-09300 2S 112CD-07600 FANNO CREEK TOWNHOMES HOWIE GEORGE E&DEBRA A OWNERS OF LOTS 1-11 15876 SW 76TH AVE 8475 SW ERNEST RD TIGARD,OR 97224 PORTLAND,OR 97225 2S 112CD-09000 2S 112CA-13000 ' ••NO CREEK TOWNH• HUTTON BRIAN D&DEBORAH A OWN - . OF • -11 15566 SW 76TH AVE 8475 SW •"- •- T RD TIGARD,OR 97224 P•' •ND,OR 9 5 23 112CD-09200 2S 112CD-08200 F• O CREEK TOWNH•' S ILTZ JUDITH ANN OWNE' • • L• -11 7555 SW ONNAF CT 8475 SW - ' "D TIGARD,OR 97224 - LAND,OR 972 2S 112C0-08900 2S 112DC-01400 • • NO CREEK TOWN • •ES JDS LLC& OWN -- OF LO -11 SANTA FE INVESTORS#1 LLC 8475 SW ' 1- RD C/O PACIFIC SANTA FE CORP P•' •ND,OR 97 5 17700 SW UPPPER BOONES FERRY RD PORTLAND,OR 97224 2S112CA-13100 2S112DB-00800 GIESBRECHT FRANK& HELEN JOHNSON ORVAL D& 15532 SW 76TH AVE REICHEL DAVID L TIGARD,OR 97224 15515 SW 74TH TIGARD,OR 97223 251 12CA-12900 2S 112CD-08500 GOODPASTER RONALD D/STEPHANIE M KASER JEFFREY RAY&PATTI L 15585 SW 76TH AVE 7525 SW ONNAF CT TIGARD,OR 97224 TIGARD,OR 97224 2S 112CD-01000 2S 112CD-00400 HAMBACH MILDRED TRUSTEE KNAUSS HARVEY L 7735 SW DURHAM RD 14383 SW MCFARLAND BLVD TIGARD,OR 97223 TIGARD,OR 97223 2S 112CA-12700 2S 112CD-03400 HANSEN GLENN M &BRENDA L LAIRD WAYNE E&TRACI L 15622 SW 76TH AVE 7660 SW BOND TIGARD,OR 97224 TIGARD,OR 97223 2S112C0-00800 2S112DC-01300 HAVERY JOHN W MADELON LARUSSO CONCRETE COMPANY INC 15970 SW 76TH AVE 15930 SW 74TH AVE TIGARD,OR 97224 TIGARD,OR 97224 2S 112C19-08400 2S 112C D-00900 MAGEE KENNETH W RIVAS ERNEST ROSE 7535 SW ONNAF CT 16060 SW 76TH AVE TIGARD, OR 97224 TIGARD,OR 97223 2S 112C D-08800 2S 112CA-08400 MAGEE KENNETH W& SAKAGUCHI MAKOTO&JOAN HALL MAGEE CLAUDIA R 7574 SW ASHFORD ST 7590 SW ONNAF CT TIGARD,OR 97224 TIGARD, OR 97224 2S 112DC-01800 2S1 12C D-07700 NADEAU ANDRE R TRUSTEE SANDERS RODNEY E&KANA M 7774 VLAHOS DR 15900 SW 76TH WILSONVILLE, OR 97070 TIGARD,OR 97224 2S 112CD-03300 2S 112CA-12800 NEUFELD DAVID& SCHERER STEPHEN T&JANET K SIMPART LORRI 15610 SW 76TH AVE 15895 SW 76TH AVE TIGARD,OR 97224 TIGARD,OR 97224 2S 112D3-00400 2S 112CA-08600 OR-WASH ENTERPRISES UNLIMITED SHERK CHRISTIAN C&TRUDI L BY JOHN F MEUPERT 7562 SW ASHFORD ST 111 SW 5TH AVE#3400 TIGARD,OR 97224 PORTLAND,OR 97204 2S112DC-00500 2S1 20C-01601 PACIFIC REALTY ASSOCIATES TIGA CI F ATTN: M CONZATTI 1312 ALL 15350 SW SEQUOIA PKWY STE 300 T ARD,OR 223 PORTLAND,OR 97224 2S 112DC-00100 2S112CA-13400 PACIFIC REALTY ASSOCIATES TIGA OF 15350 SW SEQUOIA PKWY#300-WMI 1312 LL PORTLAND,OR 97224 TI RD,OR 9 3 2S 112CD-00300 2 12CA-11900 PATTON KENT D&AMY SAGER TIGA C F 160 TIMBERLAKE 131 ALL ASHLAND,OR 97520 TI ARD,OR 23 2S 112CA-08300 2S 112CD-03500 QUANG YEN SUSAN&HAU HOWARD WAGNER ERNST J 7582 SW ASHFORD ST 7680 SW BOND TIGARD,OR 97224 TIGARD,OR 97224 112CA-13300 2S 112CD-03100 RE - SANC ••D NO.2 WALTON WILLIAM TODD&MARY FRAN OWNE' .• OTS 54-55 7655 SW BOND ST TIGARD,OR 97224 2S1120A-O€500 WHITE PAUL& HELEN 7633 SW ASHFORD ST TIGARD, OR 97224 2S 112CA-08200 WINDER SCOTT R&KAREN B 7588 SW ASHFORD ST TIGARD, OR 97224 JIM CASTILE 15715 SW 74TH AVENUE TIGARD OR 97224 Jack Biethan 11023 SW Summerfield Drive, #4 Tigard, OR 97224 Sue Rorman 11250 SW 82nd Avenue Tigard, OR 97223 Naomi Gallucci 11285 SW 78th Avenue Tigard, OR 97223 Michael Trigoboff 7072 SW Barbara Lane Tigard, OR 97223 Dieter Jacobs 7775 SW Spruce Street Tigard, OR 97223 Alexander Craghead 12205 SW Hall Boulevard Tigard, OR 97223-6210 David Chapman 9840 SW Landau Place Tigard, OR 97223 Nathan and Ann Murdock PO Box 231265 Tigard, OR 97281 CITY OF TIGARD - EAST CIT SUBCOMMITTEE (i:\curpin\setup\labels\CIT East.doc) UPDATED: December 27, 2001 Jack Biethan 11023 SW Summerfield Drive, #4 Tigard, OR 97224 Kristen Miller 8940 SW Edgewood Street Tigard, OR 97223 Paul Owen 10335 SW Highland Drive Tigard, OR 97224 Louise Fronville 15760 SW Oak Meadow Lane Tigard, OR 97224 Tim Esav PO Box 230695 Tigard, OR 97281 Nathan and Ann Murdock PO Box 231265 Tigard, OR 97281 Ross Sundberg 16382 SW 104th Avenue Tigard, OR 97224 :ITY OF TIGARD - SOUTH CIT SUBCOMMITTEE (pg. I of I) (i:\curpin\setup\labels\CIT South.doc) UPDATED: January 11, 2002 y—... / II --E .. . Ni.........) ....._ 1 01) ° r, a iFryke,,,, ...:=z4iii■ CITY OF TIGARD ,e4 CURRENT PLANNING 0 0- 4\ 13125 SW HALL BLVD ooz. .!'DRTEIND,OREGON -3.-::: a TIGARD, OR 97223 . 2S112DB-00800 JOHNSON ORVAL D& REICHEL II t.• . . C/O MONA JOHNSON • P.O. BOX 55 _. . _ _11, 8, 97119 TO SU,DER - ? 1 tT DEL!Iti. OF.1111 .... AS ADDRESSED , ': • " LE TO FoRwArm ' l 577,.:24+7517 Illiiii4444414414•44,610,1fiudiliniulihitiisliiii. i ..;4 ....4. ‘,.. T . Z t - �� o ;' A CITY OF TIGARD r CURRENT PLANNING I a 13125 SW HALL BLVD • TIGARD, OR 97223 34 P�G�\��oe OOti \ 2S 112 CD-07900 ? eo,c,' 8475 SW ERNST RD INVESTMENT UP INC sx G\' CV PORTLAND,OR 97225 �, ii DANC475* 972a53109 1COO 18 O4/19/Oa FORWARD TIME EXP RTN TO SEND : DANCWOK INVESTMENT GROUP E 817 NW SKYLINE CREST RD PORTLAND OR 97229-6834 RETURN TO SENDER .r r, it i 4 , : ii l` #. • 7s4•-•;4 iltliii6!titsiilts{iisiii.�•• si issitlstiltls!iiwiltiAlttis!idlifjui l L . i „r_ : _ t.., �_ 1 c`6 C _ �t O o . g , tl v ,. aU .„...„.4 \ JJ `2 r , CITY OF TIGARD n y CURRENT PLANNING r.�,::G; 1 13125 SW HALL BLVD iltripil TIGARD, OR 97223 PNOR' F DCREEK TOWNH ES E�'�,1 -- Q 8475 SW RNESST RD 11 '*°1 -- 202 \ PORTLAND,OR 97225 RQ• , 0 W” c�� FORWARD TIME`'EXPIORTNCTO SEND4/iii/02 DANCHOK _ PORTLANDKOR 97229-6834D RETURN TO SENDER �C.�s' {t i s i{ i( i I I i }I {{ i `! I [I S!.7..∎i—i3 Uk :":AIL iI ti t i l l II it I1iiIiII1!?iiII Iii Ii 1 1 1 1 I S I i i 1.l l i 1 i i I I t i 1 I I I l 1 it ii • I I I p CITY of TIGARD C. CITY GEOGRAPHIC INFORMATION SYSTEM _ Z �I I :. �� AREA NOTIFIED IP. a . _ (500') ■ le' �� ' REDWOOD LN N �,i�� •111 FREIE , I ,� M. , FOR: JIM ANDREWS ii i1Nilit.4 HI ?R•IIIIIIr Illir Q RE: 2S112DC-01500 = AS FORDS ` O 1 I I I 11 7' Q " tfT1■EME J KABLE:< LE LN ,n013 I 11 _' """17"' Property owner information MGM mm�nus > is valid for 3 months from I malr nmEEe■o1 nllnenu Q the date printed on this map. .;:4►. 18112111111111111 IIW�i�""'k \ n �e!C.1'`��' amsessns nmxsase � ''f w nmasewe a _ nn� N t- ilt ■ Al mamma ` \�\ U W Et I L1.1 21111111111111111 G 1 I O� :, p� ` X0 Q �nmcss7w nnlOCSMes QG N- • lia 17 r 1 N. I--' Z nn7ocoes0 0: 1111M111111 0 n LU ! 0 100 200 300 400 500 Feet O / I I IlliN.'",,,,,.......,.. ...„..... :Fr r 1'.389 feet 9 '�� A ■ City of Tigard Sh, •• Q Information on this map is for v general location only and �L, should be verified with the De Services Division. ,7'9 / 13125 SW Hat Blvd Q Tigard,OR 97223 (503)6394171 ^ •10 http:llwww.ci.ligard.or.us Community Development Plot date:Jan 15,2002;C:lmagicWIAGIC03.APR • 2S192DC-01 500 2S112CD-07900 74TH AVENUE INDUSTRIAL PARK LLC DANCHOK INVESTMENT GROUP INC 8100 SW DURHAM RD 8475 SW ERNST RD TIGARD,OR 97224 PORTLAND,OR 97225 2S 112CD-00701 S 112CD-08300 BLACKWELL JAY M&TRACI N WA • OK INVEST • GROUP INC 15950 SW 76TH 8475 S = •D TIGARD, OR 97224 ••RTLAND,OR ••. 5 2S1 12C D-00700 2S 112CD-09100 BOUMAN DONNA L fr• .OK INVEST • GROUP INC 15940 SW 76TH AVE 8475 SW N►--- 'D TIGARD,OR 97224 ':' AND,OR 9 2S 112 DC-01600 2S 112C D-08100 BOWLES JOHN MARGARET OK INVESTMENT G OUP INC 8986 SW ARAPAHO RD 8475 SW ER TUALATIN,OR 97062 ND,OR 9722 2S 112CD-07300 2S 112CD-08700 BRANSON GREGORY L&LESLIE H • HOK INVESTME 'OUP INC 15838 SW 76TH AVE 8475 SW ' -• TIGARD,OR 97224 P•• - •P,OR • - 2S 112CD-08600 2S1 12CD-07800 CARICO SUSAN E D• • •. NVESTMENT OUP INC 7570 SW ONNAF CT 8475 SW ERN -• TIGARD,OR 97224 •.- •ND,OR 97225 2S 112DC-00200 2S 112CD-08000 CATELLUS DEVELOPMENT CORPORATION K INVESTMENT GROUP INC PROPERTY TAX DEPARTMENT 8475 S 201 MISSION ST RTLAND,OR 972 SAN FRANCISCO, CA 94105 .112D C-00201 2S 112CD-03200 CA . LUS DEVELOPME •-•ORATION DAVIS EDWARD L PROPE• TAX D •--TMENT 20375 SW 93RD AVE 201 MISS $' T • TUALATIN,OR 97062 F�N-FRANCISC•, e 94105 2S 112CD-00200 2S 113AB-00800 CHRISTENSEN PHILLIP E AND DUNCAN JOHN A AND SALLY C JANICE LEE 15685 SW 76TH AVE 7060 SW PALMER WAY TIGARD,OR 97224 BEAVERTON,OR 97007 2S 112CD-03000 2S1 13AB-01600 CUNNINGHAM RONALD R&ANNE C DUNCAN JOHN ARTHUR AND 7685 SW BOND JANICE LEE TIGARD,OR 97224 7060 SW PALMER WAY BEAVERTON,OR 97007 • 23 1 12CD-07400 2S 112CA-13200 ERDMANN LENNY G&CAROL A HOLZGANG CHRISTOPHER R& 15854 SW 76TH AVE MARY ANN TIGARD,OR 97224 15508 SW 76TH AVE TIGARD,OR 97224 2S 112CD-09300 2S 112CD-07600 FANNO CREEK TOWNHOMES HOWIE GEORGE E&DEBRA A OWNERS OF LOTS 1-11 15876 SW 76TH AVE 8475 SW ERNEST RD TIGARD,OR 97224 PORTLAND,OR 97225 2S1 12CD-09000 2S1 12CA-13000 ••NO CREEK TOWNH• HUTTON BRIAN D&DEBORAH A OWN - . OF • ' -11 15566 SW 76TH AVE 8475 SW • - T RD TIGARD,OR 97224 P•- AND,OR 9 • 5 2S 112CD-09200 2S 112C0-08200 F• 0 CREEK TOWNH• • S ILTZ JUDITH ANN OWNE• • L• : -11 7555 SW ONNAF CT 8475 SW - -D TIGARD,OR 97224 - LAND,OR 972 2S112CD-08900 2S112DC-01400 NO CREEK TOWN • 1 ES JDS LLC& OWN '_ •F LO -11 SANTA FE INVESTORS#1 LLC 8475 SW ' ''. RD C/O PACIFIC SANTA FE CORP P• AND,OR 97 5 17700 SW UPPPER BOONES FERRY RD PORTLAND,OR 97224 2S1 12CA-13100 2S 112DB-00800 GIESBRECHT FRANK&HELEN JOHNSON ORVAL D& 15532 SW 76TH AVE REICHEL DAVID L TIGARD,OR 97224 15515 SW 74TH TIGARD,OR 97223 2S 112CA-12900 2S112CD-08500 GOODPASTER RONALD D/STEPHANIE M KASER JEFFREY RAY&PATTI L 15585 SW 76TH AVE 7525 SW ONNAF CT TIGARD,OR 97224 TIGARD,OR 97224 2S112CD-01000 2S112CD-00400 HAMBACH MILDRED TRUSTEE KNAUSS HARVEY L 7735 SW DURHAM RD 14383 SW MCFARLAND BLVD TIGARD,OR 97223 TIGARD,OR 97223 23 112CA-12700 2S 112CD-03400 HANSEN GLENN M&BRENDA L LAIRD WAYNE E&TRACI L 15622 SW 76TH AVE 7660 SW BOND TIGARD,OR 97224 TIGARD,OR 97223 2S112CD-00800 2S112DC-01300 HAVERY JOHN W MADELON LARUSSO CONCRETE COMPANY INC 15970 SW 76TH AVE 15930 SW 74TH AVE TIGARD,OR 97224 TIGARD,OR 97224 2S 112CD-08400 2S 112CD-00900 MAGEE KENNETH W RIVAS ERNEST ROSE 7535 SW ONNAF CT 16060 SW 76TH AVE TIGARD, OR 97224 TIGARD,OR 97223 2S 112CD-08800 2S 112CA-08400 MAGEE KENNETH W& SAKAGUCHI MAKOTO&JOAN HALL MAGEE CLAUDIA R 7574 SW ASHFORD ST 7590 SW ONNAF CT TIGARD,OR 97224 TIGARD, OR 97224 2S 112DC-01800 2S 112CD-07700 NADEAU ANDRE R TRUSTEE SANDERS RODNEY E&KANA M 7774 VLAHOS DR 15900 SW 76TH WILSONVILLE,OR 97070 TIGARD,OR 97224 2S 112CD-03300 2S 112CA-12800 NEUFELD DAVID& SCHERER STEPHEN T&JANET K SIMPART LORRI 15610 SW 76TH AVE 15895 SW 76TH AVE TIGARD,OR 97224 TIGARD, OR 97224 2S1 12D B-00400 2S112CA-08600 OR-WASH ENTERPRISES UNLIMITED SHERK CHRISTIAN C&TRUDI L BY JOHN F MEUPERT 7562 SW ASHFORD ST 111 SW 5TH AVE#3400 TIGARD,OR 97224 PORTLAND,OR 97204 2S112DC-00500 2S1 2DC-01601 PACIFIC REALTY ASSOCIATES TIGA'• CIT •F ATTN: M CONZATTI 1312 :f1 ALL 15350 SW SEQUOIA PKWY STE 300 T .ARD,OR 223 PORTLAND,OR 97224 2S 112DC-00100 2S112CA-13400 PACIFIC REALTY ASSOCIATES TIGA OF 15350 SW SEQUOIA PKWY#300-WMI 1312 LL PORTLAND,OR 97224 TI RD,OR 9 3 2S112CD-00300 2 12CA-11900 PATTON KENT D&AMY SAGER TIGA- • C OF 160 TIMBERLAKE 131 .ALL ASHLAND,OR 97520 TI.ARD,OR • 23 2S 112CA-08300 2S 112CD-03500 QUANG YEN SUSAN &HAU HOWARD WAGNER ERNST J 7582 SW ASHFORD ST 7680 SW BOND TIGARD, OR 97224 TIGARD,OR 97224 112CA-13300 2S112CD-03100 RE SANC • ••D NO.2 WALTON WILLIAM TODD& MARY FRAN OWNE' .' OTS 54-55 7655 SW BOND ST TIGARD,OR 97224 2S 112CA-08500 WHITE PAUL& HELEN 7633 SW ASHFORD ST TIGARD, OR 97224 2S 112CA-08200 WINDER SCOTT R&KAREN B 7588 SW ASHFORD ST TIGARD,OR 97224 • Jack Biethan 11023 SW Summerfield Drive, #4 Tigard, OR 97224 Sue Rorman 11250 SW 82nd Avenue Tigard, OR 97223 Naomi Gallucci 11285 SW 78th Avenue Tigard, OR 97223 Michael Trigoboff 7072 SW Barbara Lane Tigard, OR 97223 Dieter Jacobs 7775 SW Spruce Street Tigard, OR 97223 Alexander Craghead 12205 SW Hall Boulevard Tigard, OR 97223-6210 David Chapman 9840 SW Landau Place Tigard, OR 97223 Nathan and Ann Murdock PO Box 231265 Tigard, OR 97281 CITY OF TIGARD - EAST CIT SUBCOMMITTEE (i:\curpin\setup\labels\CIT East.doc) UPDATED: December 27, 2001 Jack Biethan 11023 SW Summerfield Drive, #4 Tigard, OR 97224 Kristen Miller 8940 SW Edgewood Street Tigard, OR 97223 Paul Owen 10335 SW Highland Drive Tigard, OR 97224 Louise Fronville 15760 SW Oak Meadow Lane Tigard, OR 97224 Tim Esav PO Box 230695 Tigard, OR 97281 Nathan and Ann Murdock PO Box 231265 Tigard, OR 97281 Ross Sundberg 16382 SW 104th Avenue Tigard, OR 97224 CITY OF TIGARD - SOUTH CIT SUBCOMMITTEE (pg. I of I) (i:\curpin\setup\Iabels\CIT South.doc) UPDATED: January 11, 2002 3 CITY OF TIGARD LOMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT PLANNING DIVISION CITY OF TIGARD Community Devefopment 13125 SW HALL BOULEVARD Shaping A Oetter Community TIGARD, OREGON 97223r 1/4S*i PHONE: 503-639.4171 FAX: 503-684-n97(Attn: F4ter r#e7{i4tnNing) ' El.UE T FOR ijEl: OOT ' OPERTY AILING US' Property owner information is valid for 3 months from the date of your request INDICATE ALL PROJECT MAP & TAX lOT_NUMBERS (i-e- Is134AB, Tax lot 00100) OR THE ADDRESSES FOR ALL PROJECT PARCELS BELOW and INCLUDE A MAP OF ALL LOTS FOR THE PROJECT (preferably assessor's tax map): -r-.ax. MA,P 2S 1.1 _2_ a ' _ 1- x 1.c4_ '# 1 g Ob _ 151 t 5�kl , 14 ta ,,\L � �- t ? Op_ INDICATE WHETHER YOU ARE REQUESTING 2 OR 3 SETS OF LABELS: 3 Ta, ._. (NOTE: A minimum of 2 sets of labels will be provided to place an your 2 sets of envelopes that applicants are required to submit at the time of application submittal. II a neighborhood meeting is required and you have not yet held that meeting, you should request 3 sets) NAME OF CONTACT PERSON: JIM- __I. -}.__ PHONE: app (2-Q - This request may be mailed, faxed, or hand delivered to the City of Tigard. Please allow a 2-day minimum for processing requests. Upon completion of your request, the contact person will be called to pick up their request in "Will Call" by their last name, at the Community Development Reception Desk. The cost of processing your request must be paid at the time of pick up, as exact cost can not be pre-determined. PLEASE NOTE: FOR REASONS OF ACCURACY, ONLY ORIGINAL MAILING LABELS PROVIDED BY THE CITY VS. RE-TYPED MAILING LABELS WILL BE ACCEPTED. ost Description: $I I to generate the mailing list, plus $2 per sheet for printing the list onto labels (20 addresses per sheet). Then, multiply the cost to print one set of labels by the number of sets requested_ *EXAMPLE * * * COST FOR THIS REQUEST * * sheets of labels x $2/sheet = $$.00 x _2_sets - $16-00 q sheet(s) of labels x$2/sheet = � Ex 3 sets = L21 sheets of labels x$2/sheet for CIT area x 2 sets = $4.00 sheet(s) of labels x S2/sheet for CIT area = $_. x 3 sets = $1,2_ GENERATE UST = 4 aalt GENERATE UST - TOTAL = $31.00 TOTAL = S L/ . Eil 3OVd `VVVZZ:0[ ZO-P -NVf`9E9E X89 EOS 'ONI `ONIU33NION3 I100IN :JAB 1NdS SENT BY: NICOLI ENGINEERING, INC. ; 503 684 3636; JAN 14 02 10:22AP�1; PAGE 2/3 D N fEl O 1 illgot, 3 A J 1z r N CJ 10 o I L ,�' mil, y 4P'� rm� r i r� .,r n, y�' -°`°'CMS r 33,-1,4�'.�r� 'i f Y' : ",., :r. nJ T t;„ ��tia. i . S ',' 1 `.7,,,--,,,,A 1 } Sr l'K^. 'Y W n/ ,r4 ql N4 f 1' .•.�..•. •�� •Qut d '�4r.�� } y 'rr �i1. a �'S �.,r '�� '41,,1� F�+r".�4% r•''." A. � Z tl ro7nG 'l7lx'3r e'�,e. 1 la"��:!9. :'?i`i:...r ,.':•.:,.. . I-4 •si; 4'' Y SJW IItr r0W Y t `� 7 1 i- r fih Z , .,> _ 1 r Scar •fl i. 0,w) �,r 4t*....,.ad,,,vey �t ":�. . �i$`v 4 ` .. r r,:i q�' '' �'*'r AbT 'e `311- H,tiJ,.e,Ili P4,Al',�� 1r r Lk P;' ti NL l e Jr wr s$i s ' r t'., OiA r.. A r'�4..C` y„1 :::/• •`+� i'iM ` s n nY^M,,.: i r .-(:,""!a y4.*-y , A.Y x.7'7 sf -.. ��..p.,.,.�. L... r. i, '< o ti S ukif'• x. ,4 s Cy ',.'".-3,1,,,.i'',, �. „ '.:,• *'a'<k''! 'r r' r '; - /��k > +: y$ .d:.oa�(,r�,rnlf•� ik',i4,}.r{ �n:a i `� $s.+?r.,' a kk''.1 74- )i ,�: �...; ,•J t• (1 f ( ,i ryr .tom '-•,o 'P n � �+� ! n�'rr14� �I ,• t(; i ,, ac y .44./.1.,,...,i2,,0 S "7Ei 1∎0 R. p r t ,,- •� "t b,yiro� n: .., , it� SA lr : �Y i . . . .. ,� A.''•• .i,. '' o• '41 '� • rr S M1 r''•wr r f.. kt, •�`2... •St••r"' A<'` } 1 f ' ~'• iM _ 1'�1M Y. fl rr 0:a 1 1" ..y.-p,.:•y y»..r... r. 1 Q >. I H ,y.Y r. i'�ve:i.y� :rt. _ :r� t�•}tike.� Y.,r y�,_ �r^ rpy �r` ;'^.c..r.f .... •:,:::"...1.::1.'422.M.:51".:-.-4'.:!''';' ;;;;,.:'.....7 6:`i'\'iF#i4�.H:!':::1Y.r .•.y..'„�' '._C'l� !1i1 {fir gg ,"%""I�''� ' w{. .�A�:.� �Y:" • ,., '.r' si' a1 r.rlrrsc 6 try ry I �,'t _,•,.« 4rti f'..��`.�r'�'.t:l vn.'r. }: L 1' �L � i�+w tr{ '+-•t q �� �r. xy ��'' t '9i r„;r .»„r R� - ,, rr e , ; i �^.a }LYC' `'" r ::-... F..3 ,}�': Lr.4.. 4.,,',4 ,4 ..•�.Y va :,• r,..r•.=^ 1 f u; is ,1 t r fit. , �'' l3 A rt .t. ,u' v r &,..."'i r•.' F�M�"^y ✓ ,+,rr ''�$'\ {a 1v 4f� ,?,{M `^ 'fir lf4q q+'r•- r:ri% *•i1-: .l.<' . �_m�3.41,k3.:ata . ,;..1,4'. i...l,t..u..y.. ..'L •, .� ,, a1+ j��t7� �.:„... T.�t11 '}'y 1 ,i 'DN r sy.4. 'n' "r c K "� ..,,,- s.Yl wa 2vr l,r75� .F.1'r''; : ,. 11 2t�� n lr t {r �r'%s+ a ik r �'• n w- +J+wr. :9;.....„...... l,e?„i •,A 1 ra ,e 'k "t , - ...-�i r i,; iNa 1,,r t yi:c 3r, r r ^'NV''r.::��:�:":•,,':.: e tia n asFh`.. rp .r : (.1_il4),1 rC �ij J �7. x' f•:, t < 1 '_•:, "',1J '4i;:wX` 4 , r •,i,'ar '�. �i{.+1.n. ';t . ••s.• -wa d *'% ,' 4 q t wyii y :`,yt _ ,. l' Eck" �y1 !' i 't', .tl u ?1,;'‘,1.'47=';:'•! I.' .: '4 r •� ,,qp rY t n r+ ! .. .. 7. ,,,jj, I r'9,"•" ��'� br Sy'Y r i ^J '�...• 1 I^ 71tY'� b :...',,.,..,',.•. 7r< .. 3Y'�,X`L'� � Y 9 i . r a f }u 'xis .• : .,yy.>k -'t +$ ,ry Fw >fh :• ia tilt �� n r• N ,y , c �'/C y ;•r rrkr k'yt x .,k,ta"i.a+si,. %+ („FC�, �'�”- .d:3.�',y�Y'E'2:rc'..•.:- {rt... P M:Y ` t t ,.1,7;.!":d 3 4 i't ti: 3..4,..._'r :- ' •n • .{C»• igpy a •�•(_•° 2 ./_" Y�', ,� yY A>( { -/Y�` tt �tp u .. SA+rh+iy �*, vW ��ydr lr• �.•■ in"*.'"‘... . }2irr w•'�' V:,t4', 1 Ii r� e vV• ~'4 0� 4�. , „r��9�e t� 't i w9�t` r :. V �*r�.fir' s 1 t��y w' 1y.�'�'`f��'� '�'�".[�. is T .:ter i w'itl e ..,.*+i q; . A7G h q 3`. ,r 4 s. • F t �,, A ?: �`n" ` r. r jam'w i Y ! = r 3 °.:.. �N. .N •in > .,...4,,,:::,i,:- ..;:r 4 f it ,,,,,....,.4,4:- fl �.3 \ .; �i - S .fry _.. •�' �l7 5 Ar $ ..1:.'`.- •• y �. • ortp.,1.. '-'',>•.i A J - 1' 'i - ':S:i,•r.*•41,1. 7 1, ,�y 4 r �,�y f -�,Y;4.{.r.'.'.'R.t}•• .' r ya. rr rr GG rr'. �.?:Sf'n ;:'S• xi d!C�`n "''�'.'r��' :' rl ZI5' 't.f3,'_ijI r}i '4 b. 'r�'+"r111"1111:114;7.34.,,,,,,, :h.a,' .F:0'r'Y', r.,+::• '•E:r: i'7%"2 .... " 7 , � > t4•:. .� r-yrlap'rr{•,1q : Y�, �. ,• Y^ w . Y,'..;.,.',' �`k•:*';,,_,�,i:•.,�rQ• :-i;: r ;:i ' . +ri M1. .ter`�f!5 3;i J17 „f ;'��,S±,r '. . A. SENT BY: NICOLI ENGINEERING, INC. : 503 684 3636; JAN-11 (12 10:23AM; PAGE 3/3 11'Nov Kra memo rorrou '---' "AY Mk IS MP azu wmo wit-Is moo MUM 111311012i P1001:1113211i IA..M4 OW NA t 15 m nnoo oi 10 .ttgLAV *t' i.-.,..1:'.;3:t;,':1•;;:•! - me alf11111.8 / D kNI ONLIEGI FAO 1.401131E1ANCX) ..1' 4 TLIEVO ror Alva-rokusnam anv 41VL I a<a 111 114 • _ maw . • • -1 i ..... . • I.— OREGON ELECTRIC RAILROAD A - 1 E in s,W. 74TH AVE. b § —-—-—-—-—-—-—-—-—-——-—- - .: •-- • ...'A * E aNNOMWS WAS ilp i tF i 1 :- ■•• ■■ ■•■■ 111■1. lam It I 1 P 1 011) 0 1 f 0 6- 1 9 w x il X 1 1 ) IS i EVITI R 2 1 Z __ 1 , 13 1 tS' h' • — MI 1 _ , 'ilia / 1 ! 1 1-1 I 16-I ii..'. b . 1 I1 II Ma I • ./ .0,ONCTVIR I . I . 1 • ..--- • ' --..- • . 1- - = I 1 i 11 1 . 111 ..... alla ..--''.... Z a ' • - \ - a . , .". ..... I , . _ ' , .11 .„. . fail 4C--. - • -.-- ."--... . . . . .,.. L,•_ ,. _---....._...& . . ., _ , ..-:./. 1.)4•_•- ..• .... • . • . 1 ....._ _.,..... • ----- - _ -- ) • . ...... ly: i ...... ... , N. .\. i.9, •.. H .... . ... •\ - .., _ _ --...., ......„, _.,, • assessor . txt Assessor Information Tax Lot Number: 2S112DC01500 `` Property Address : 15615 SW 74TH AVE \ Mailing Information: 74TH AVENUE INDUSTRIAL PARK LLC Q �) 8100 SW DURHAM RD ' �'v TIGARD I 97224 , , ,),,,) Assessor Taxlot Size : 4 . 61 (Acres) V?j Building Square Footage : 0 (Square Feet) Assessed Land Value : $439220 Assessed Building Value : $1884390 Total Assessed Value : $2323610 Last Sale Date : 06/22/98 Sale Price : $0 . 00 Page 1 APPLICANT MATERIALS cortrAo (34za, .. 4Voz. SITE DEVELOPMENT REVIEW zoo TYPE II APPLICATION CITY OF TIGARD 13125 SW Hall Blvd., Tigard, OR 97223 (503) 639-4171 FAX: (503) 684-7297 GENERAL INFORMATION 2 . 22 •b2 PRE-APP. HELD WITH: yY)S/ k('/ es?� DATE OF PRE-APP.: 'ES _ Z 3 _ p Property Address/Location(s): 1 51 l 5 S•to , FOR STAFF USE ONLY Ti&,&lz-b 012. °t-72 24 Tax Map & Tax Lot#(s): 2S 1 1 2 b L / 1 S d o Case No.(s):,�U (3a'OCO n � Other Case No.(s): 1 �.S 5 ao, Receipt No.: v. 0 . Site Size: i „� Application Accepted By: 1l Property Owner/Deed Holder(s)*: t.) e... Date: a���� Address: 1 511 5 S.1.4. 1 4 kt" Phone&o3) 3I4-g 'l2 City: ` 1 Gn,A D d Zip: q 1 224- _ Date Determined To Be Complete: Applicant": J 1 M CAST 1 i.e.. _ Comp Plan/Zone Designation: Address: 1 511 5 S.W. 14n- Phone(541)314- •cxt2 _L.: :,ity: T�1lrAtar) G ti Zip: qt X1224 CIT Area: * When the owner and the applicant are different people, the applicant must be the purchaser of record or a lessee in possession Rev.11/26/98 i:lcurpinVnasterslsdra.doc with written authorization from the owner or an agent of the owner. The owner(s) must sign this application in the space provided on the back of this form or submit a written authorization with this REQUIRED SUBMITTAL ELEMENTS application. Netcth.bor hc � lug f"t�hu�tsrtyr4 ✓ Application Elements ubmitted: PROPOSAL SUMMARY Application Form /Owner's Signature/Written Authorization The owners of record of the subject property request Site Title Transfer Instrument or Deed Development Review approval to allow(please be specific): (� ite/Plot Plan Mon F-r 14,1'1 t4 STIZ-U GT L �L _ (#of copies based on pre-app check list) ro(L b ite/Plot Plan (reduced 8'/2"x 11") APD ToLuEr ' QOM 712 CX1iT 041.71 L'J Applicant's Statement ( of copies based on pre-app check list) U11ib onstruction Cost Estimate SA Sewer Use Information Card SST. GoNe2T izU Lr 1 o M Gb ST +23i 0 0 (Distributed/completed at application submittal) Sets of Pre-Addressed/Pre-Stamped Legal Size Envelopes (S/a I4 J �'L ASt✓ copy t4Ico1.1 NcAn.A4 �lµG1 ❑ Filing Fee (Under$100,000) $ 800.00 ($100,000-$999,999) $1,600.00 ON ZI1.olRNT 1`e-,t-1 /VSPo1-tC_5/Q v(,r ($1 Million&Over) $1,780.00 (+$5/$10,000) 1 I( 1 lS - (t— frn-"- ci List any VARIANCE, CONDITIONAL USE, SENSITIVE LANDS, OR OTHER LAND USE ACTIONS to be considered as part of this application: APPLICANTS: To consider an application complete, you will need to submit ALL of the REQUIRED SUBMITTAL ELEMENTS as described on the front of this application in the"Required Submittal Elements" box. (Detailed Submittal Requirement Information sheets can be obtained, upon request, for all types of Land Use Applications.) THE APPLICANT(S) SHALL CERTIFY THAT: • The above request does not violate any deed restrictions that may be attached to or imposed upon the subject property. • If the application is granted, the applicant will exercise the rights granted in accordance with the terms and subject to all the conditions and limitations of the approval. • All of the above statements and the statements in the plot plan, attachments, and exhibits transmitted herewith, are true; and the applicants so acknowledge that any permit issued, based on this application, may be revoked if it is found that any such statements are false. • The applicant has read the entire contents of the application, including the policies and criteria, and understands the requirements for approving or denying the application. SIGNATURES of each owner of the subject property. DATED this Le) day of i-c b ruL--c , 20 (- 2- • /1 Jdto C6L)/i & iio Owngr`S SIgnaMafe- 'q e t !' Owner's Signature Owner's Signature Owner's Signature 2 SITE DEVELOPMENT REVIEW ' TYPE II APPLICATION CITY OF TIGARD 13125 SW Hall Blvd., Tigard, OR 97223 (503) 639-4171 FAX: (503) 684-7297 GENERAL INFORMATION PRE-APP. HELD WITH: DATE OF PRE-APP.: Property Address/Location(s): FOR STAFF USE ONLY Tax Map &Tax Lot#(s): Case No.(s): Other Case No.(s): Receipt No.: Site Size: Application Accepted By: Applicant*: Date: Address: Date Determined Complete: City/State: Zip: Rev.8/21/2001 i:\curpin\masters\revised\sdra.doc Primary Contact: Phone: Fax: REQUIRED SUBMITTAL ELEMENTS Property Owner/Deed Holder(s)*: (Attach list if more than one) (Note: applications will not be accepted without the required submittal elements) Address: Phone: _ ❑ Application Form City/State: Zip: ❑ Owner's Signature/Written Authorization ❑ Title Transfer Instrument or Deed * When the owner and the applicant are different people, the applicant ❑ Copy of Pre Application Conf. Notes must be the purchaser of record or a lessee in possession with written authorization from the owner or an agent of the owner. The owner(s) ❑ Site/Plot Plan must sign this application in the space provided on the back of this (#of copies based on pre-app check list) form or submit a written authorization with this application. ❑ Site/Plot Plan (reduced 8'/7"x 11") PROPOSAL SUMMARY ❑ Applicant's Statement (#of copies based on pre-app check list) The owners of record of the subject property request Site I ❑ CWS Sewer Use Information Card Development Review approval to allow(please be specific): (Distributed/completed at application submittal) ❑ CWS Service Provider Letter ❑ 2 Sets of Pre-Addressed/Pre-Stamped #10 Envelopes & Copy of 500' Property Owner List Generated by the City ❑ Neighborhood Mtg. Affidavits & Notes ❑ Filing Fee: (Under$100,000) $ 800.00 ($100,000-$999,999) $1,600.00 ($1 Million&Over) $1,780.00 (+$5/$10,000 over the first million) l Urban: (See Washington County fee schedule) 1 o / trrcOcVQ NicoIi Engineering, Inc. PO Box 23784 Tigard, Oregon 97281 • Phone. (503) 620-2086 • Fax: (503) 684-3636 SITE DEVELOPMENT REVIEW APPLICATION DOCUMENTS PROJECT: 74 Th. Ave. Industrial Park 15715 S.W. 74th Ave. Tigard, Oregon 97224 FEB. 22, 2002 TABLE OF CONTENTS • Application Form • Narrative • Impact Study • Affidavit of Posting Notice • Affidavit of Mailing • Neighborhood Notification Letter • Sign in Sheet • Meeting Minutes • Address Labels • Unified Sewerage Service Provider Letter For Toilet Room • Title Transfer Instrument • Pre — Application Conference Notes • Reduced Application Drawings RECEIVED FEB 2 8 2002 CITY OF TIGARD PLANNING/ENGINEERING SITE DEVELOPMENT REVIEW A TYPE II APPLICATION CITY OF TIGARD 13125 SW Hall Blvd., Tigard, OR 97223(503) 639-4171 FAX:(503) 684-7297 GENERAL INFORMATION 2. 22•62 PRE-APP. HELD WITH: MS kr/ 1312, DATE OF PRE-APP.: $ - 2 3 _ O I Property Address/Location(s): 1 5'1 15 S.W. 1�}M Aye FOR STAFF USE ONLY '11��lzb Ole. °11224 Tax Map & Tax Lot#(s): 2S l I 'L b C, / 1 5 0 D Case No.(s): Other Case No.(s): Site Size: 5, rj aG. Receipt No.: Application Accepted By: Property Owner/Deed Holder(s)*: Date: Address: 1 51 1 5 S.1.4. 14 tY- Phone( o5) M4- 2 City: `f(,M1 p I 1 d {Z, Zip: c l 1 2 2`A- Date Determined To Be Complete: Applicant*: 01,M CAST 1 t.E.. Comp Plan/Zone Designation: Address: 15115 62.W. 14 Phone(re 314-$O4 . City: TI 1&,&dZ.n t3 Zip: q '12 2-4 CIT Area: * When the owner and the applicant are different people, the applicant must be the purchaser of record or a lessee in possession Rev.11126!98 i:lcurpinVnasterslsdra.doc with written authorization from the owner or an agent of the owner. The owner(s) must sign this application in the space provided on the back of this form or submit a written authorization with this REQUIRED SUBMITTAL ELEMENTS application. ❑ Kie-tql.bor h L,{es-rLt's',' ✓ Application Elements'ubmitted: PROPOSAL SUMMARY ❑ Application Form ❑ Owner's Signature/Written Authorization The owners of record of the subject property request Site ❑ Title Transfer Instrument or Deed Development Review approval to allow(please be specific): ❑ Site/Plot Plan M bbl F Y X 1'7T 61-12.A.1 LT ll 12� _ (#of copies based on pre-app check list) rorL ❑ Site/Plot Plan (reduced 8'/2"x 11") APP -ro(1. 1 'VOdM V t xt r t t-tt, ❑ Applicant's Statement Ut La I (#of copies based on pre-app check list) 13 4 ❑ Construction Cost Estimate ❑ USA Sewer Use Information Card GJT'. GbNe.,TLuL1'1 OH 60 ST =If', DOD (Distributed/completed at application submittal) ❑ 2 Sets of Pre-Addressed/Pre-Stamped (S/a Legal Size Envelopes '1(`j ‘q) AS cop( N1COU t-kcAlt-ye.-EvArt61 ❑ Filing Fee (Under sloo,000) $ 800.00 ($100,0004999,999) $1,600.00 Hr 9 oiptHY I�t 4 S��I`l � �I t er4' ($1 Million&Over) $1,780.00 IT�1~[S. (+$5/$1 0,000) 1 I ( rt�a sly r k- (6 -qe-E (c4- fn-►-t Project Narrative 74th Ave Industrial Park Change of Use Request and Toilet Room Addition The following narrative addressed the review criteria noted on sheet 7 of 9 form the pre- application conference notes dated 8-23-01: Project Description: The proposed project consists of two items. First, the applicant is proposing to upgrade the existing shop/garage structure into a leaseable space, which will consist of 2 small offices and a storage or light manufacturing area. This scope of the project will be performed within the existing building envelope. The second portion will be an addition of a toilet room to building D. This facility will be used primarily by the future tenants of the modified structure. Section 18.360 Site Development Review: This application will be reviewed as a type II procedure. The original industrial park was approved per SDR 97-00002. This application is requesting a major modification per Section 18.360.050, which requires a type II procedure. It is understood that the Site Development Review is effective for 11/2 years with a possible 1 year extension, which must be approved by the Director. No exceptions as noted in Section 18.360.080 are being requested with this application. Section 18.390 Decision Making Process: The proposed project will be reviewed by a "Type II Procedure". Decisions are decided by the Director with public notice and opportunity for a hearing. Appeal by any party is allowed and decision will be determined by the Hearings Officer. No special procedures as noted in Section 18.390.070 are being requested with this application. Section 18.530 Industrial Zoning Districts: The site is located in the Industrial Park District (I-P). The proposed project will provide additional leaseable space in the existing Industrial Park. No tenants have been identified at this time, but will be required to be an approved use within this district as outlined in this code section and table 18.530.1 . The following summarizes the compliance with the Development Standards as outlined in table 18.530.2: Min. Lot Width: 50' per standard/ provide 360' at 74th Avenue Front Yard Setback: 35' per standard/ provided 295'± Side Yard 0/50' per standard/ 251' at east yard 50' at west side/ 251' at west yard Rear Yard 0/50' per standard/ provided 37' Maximum Height 45' per standard/ 17' proposed Maximum Site Coverage 75% per standard/ 35% proposed X:\J-020104\Letters\Project Narative.doc Minimum Landscaping 25% per standard/ 65% proposed Section 18.705 Access/Egress/Circulation: No modifications are being proposed by this application to the previously approved access and egress from 74t or onsite circulation. Section 18.745 Landscaping/Screening: No new landscaping or modifications to the existing landscaping is being proposed with this application. The existing caretakers residence is separated from the existing shop/garage structure which is to be modified, by approximately 47 feet. We have assumed that buffering/screening requirements will be required. Approximately 35' north of the modified structure is a 3' tall concrete retaining wall with a hedge of arborvitaes. Behind the hedge is approximately 30' of lawn with deciduous trees which meeting the requirement of buffer E-1. The south and east sides abut I-P uses, therefore screening is not required. The west side is approximately 225' from the property line, which abuts a residential zone. Section 18.755 Mixed Solid Waste/Recycling Storage: The proposed tenants will utilize the existing onsite disposal storage facilities. The original disposal facilities were approved for the entire park, including building F (3,840 s.f.) which was never constructed, therefore the existing onsite facilities should be adequate for the proposed modifications. Section 18.765 Off Street Parking/Loading Requirements: Per section 18.765.20, C, 2, the modifications proposed will intensify the use in terms of vehicle parking spaces required. 4 Additional parking spaces have been proposed (three for the new leaseable space and one the space being omitted by the construction of the pathway, which will connect to the lease space to the public way.). One additional bicycle parking space has been proposed adjacent to the pathway connection at building D. Section 18.775 Sensitive Lands Review: The proposed modifications are located inside an existing structure/envelope. No work will be required with the floodplain, National drainage ways, wetlands or associated buffers. A survey and wetland delineation boundary summary was completed with the original land use action for the Park. Section 18.790 Tree Removal: No trees are being proposed to be removed by the application. Section 18.795 Visual Clearance Areas: No modifications to the visual clearance at the exit/egress points, are being proposed with this application. Section 18.810 Street and Utility Improvement Standards: Street and utility improvements were permitted and installed with the initial development of the park. No modifications or new improvements are being proposed. X:\J-020104\Letters\Project Narative.doc Impact Study 74th Ave Industrial Park Change of Use Request and Toilet Room Addition Scope of Project: The applicant is proposing to modify an existing shop/garage into a commercial use and construct toilet facility addition to an existing structure, noted a building "D" on the submitted documents. The impact of the development to the public facilities and services will be minimal. All the necessary improvements to / installation of the public facilities where constructed or installed at the time the Industrial Park was constructed. Transportation System: The existing shop/storage structure was used by the on site caretakers. The change of use will create additional vehicular trips. Half street improvements to 74th Avenue, which includes pavement, curbs and sidewalks etc. where constructed as required when the Park was developed. A bikeway path easement was dedicated to the City when the Park was originally developed Drainage System: No impact on the drainage system will be imposed onto the public system by this proposed project. Parks System: No impact to the park system will be imposed onto the public park system. Water System: The proposed up grade of the shop/garage will not require water service. The proposed toilet facility will utilize the potable water already available at building "D". Storm Sewer: The water quality facility was sized for the site improvements, of the original park. Impervious surfaces and buildings A, B, C, D, E F, and G where used to size the facility. Building F, a 3,840 s.f. building was not constructed and building G was to be a 5,760 s.f. structure; but due to soil conditions, it was modified to be a 4,800 s.f. building. These modifications provide a 9,600 s.f. impervious surface "credit". As noted on the existing conditions plan, there are additional paved areas south and east of the shop/garage area, that were not included in the original design of the water quality facility. This area equals approximately an additional 4,618 s.f. With this additional impervious surface, the water quality facility is still within its original design parameters. Sanitary Sewer: The sanitary sewer is located between building C and D, in the drive isle. The proposed toilet room will connect to this line, see sheet 2.3. No sanitary sewer is required for the modified shop/garage area. Noise Impact: No additional noise will be generated by the proposed modification to the existing shop/garage. X:\J-020104\Letters\Impact Study.doc AFFIDAVIT OF POSTING NOTICE WITHIN SEVEN(7)CALENDAR DAYS OF THE SIGN POSTING,RETURN THIS AFFIDAVIT TO: City of Tigard Planning Division 13125 SW Hall Boulevard Tigard,OR 97223 I, IJ,&HES V. 1Lt4D - t4S , do affirm that I am (represent) the party initiating interest in a proposed ei.MUDINCA MOGIVICATION 4 AGO 1T1ori affecting the land located at (state the approximate location(s) if no address(s) and/or tax lot(s) currently registered) 2-S112-DC- / 15oo , and did on the SS day of JANI.1A1Z-( , 49— personally post notice indicating that the site may be proposed for a t At4tD 2 002 yg e.. application, and the time, date and place of a neighborhood meeting to discuss the proposal. The sign was posted at YAb AV 1. Ftot4T1 ri 61 Z. 14. 14 lie' Avg. (state location you posted notice on property) •.........._. 1111P illr__...._ _ ______. "I ture (In the presence of a Notary Public) (THIS SECTION FOR A STATE OF OREGON,NOTARY PUBLIC TO COMPLETEJNOTARIZE) Subscribed and sworn/affirmed before me on the day of i_ I I , 16� : .....stPr...w....... Mgcti wa,s ........a"........ww+e .„ ,OF-FICAL EAt [ t NO Y COMMISSION Ex?IAr.b �1:, My Commission Expires: 14 (/ (Applicant,please complete information below for proper placement with proposed project) rNAME OF PROJECT OR PROPOSED NAME: i4 Aye. IHbue-Jft.l<4L TAU. ' ' TYPE OF PROPOSED DEVELOPMENT: I`loD1)!IGAT ION of VATCA. ELUGtt-Iti✓E f F- 60111—V-C- 6 Ube t4. Name of Applicant/Owner:, 01TM1 CA`9TIlg t I Address or General Location of Subject Property: 1 511 S S.U.7. 7416- I LSubject Property Tax Map(s)and Lot#(s): 2511 2 OGL 1 SOO h:llogin patty masterslaffpost.mst AFFIDAVIT OF MAILING STATE OF OREGON ) )ss. City of Tigard ) I, .),a.MtS D. p.NDLE ILIS , being duly sworn, depose and say that on JANLIAIa Y 2.l 20b2 , 1-9— , I caused to have mailed to each of the persons on the attached list, a notice of a meeting to discuss a proposed development at (or near) S.W. 1411 QY . 1i-ou 1rtil!}I. P,& 4 a copy of which notice so mailed is attached hereto and made a part of hereof. I further state that said notices were enclosed in envelopes plainly addressed to said persons and were deposited on the date indicated above in the United States Post Office located at Ti la,A0.b I CA. , with postage prepaid thereon. • an,,A.. .4/t7, ( tom nature (In the presence of a Notary Public) (THIS SECTION FOR A STATE OF OREGON, NOTARY PUBLIC TO COMPLETE/NOTARIZE) Subscribed and sworn/affirmed before me on the (-)Li day of 11 _ V , 1t . i ,, i , 4."---- 5-c.-4-' OFFICIAL.SEAL , Et-AMNE C WEER�' � �t.,s�'c�'� °o°' N►` P: 't(tIt. PUBLIC OF OREGON Cr.�.-si:>tr,t; :40.,,161 - �/l .... .y _-,;.,e^. , ^ ;,-,.'';s SEP 16,2002 My Commission Expires: Ovl ( ' MI" (Applicant,please complete information below for proper placement with proposed project) I NAME OF PROJECT OR PROPOSED NAME: 74 0 Aws. l I.e ue-ortiR L l'AU% TYPE OF PROPOSED DEVELOPMENT: MDDI)=tGM1ON bf% r cb., rimr,rue,m t z- ea4fi MIR, -IZ Name of Applicant/Owner: .J11-1 Cisorn.g. Address or General Location of Subject Property: 15?15 5.W. lef y` I Subject Property Tax Map(s)and Lot#(s): 2 511 2 tx J'(5OO h:Uoginlpatty masterslafmail.mst ■ Nicoli Engineering , Inc . PO Box 23784 Tigard, Oregon 97281 • Phone: (503) 620-2086 • Fax: (503) 684-3636 January 21, 2002 NEI#: 02-0104 Interested Party RE: Neighborhood Meeting Notification FOR: 15715 74th Avenue Tigard, Oregon Tax Map #: 2S112DC Tax Lot #: 1500 To Whom It May Concern: Nicoli Engineering is representing, the owner of the property know as 74th Avenue Industrial Park (see attached vicinity map). The owner is proposing to convert an existing garage/shop into a commercial use and add a toilet facility to an existing building. Prior to applying to the City of Tigard for the necessary permits, we would like to discuss the proposal in more detail with the surrounding property owners and residents. You are invited to attend a meeting Tuesday, February 12, 2002 at our offices located at 9025 SW Center, Tigard Oregon at 6:00 p.m. Please realize this will be an informational meeting to discuss preliminary plans. These plans may be altered prior to the submittal of the application to the City of Tigard. We look forward to more specifically discussing the proposal with you. Please call me at the number above it you have any questions. Sincerely, /I James Andrews Project Manager jda/hmb enclosures X\J-0201041Letters\Preliminary Public Meeting doc 9025 SW Center Street Tigard, OR 97223 _„_ www.nicoliengineering.com N e9'DI'b_E 534ID0' • I I I—1,-. ,4 4... • - - . ._ � p ... \ eGIOARr 1.;11-2 I I I nt j BUILDING'A' I I I C.) ?_E 9 15615 I j •:. \ .e•4.on I 711 �.. It■100; s - rI 11 err I j PROJECT DATA - µ711 9 I id TAX MAP NO: 251I2DC 1 ) I TAX MAP NO. 25 112DC TAX LOT 1500 I I I I I 3 to I I I O I TAX LOT NO. 1500 '--1 I I —I �,„ 1 .b I m "'��...d. d g I I PREVIOUS SITE DEVELOPMENT CARETAKERS RESIDENCE e� 1 I REVIEW NO.: 91-00002 >s7u / l a BUILDING'B' m 1 I z I I ICI Ir I x I 1Fi ! <a PI J / I I BUILDING'C' _ >srn I g 1 A j I a j P.6 Irgl TV NETLATID i —,I` Q EC i / \ ( ac %\ j I I Q •i P.1 BUILDING'D' :, ' Q 57 'P� �z / row 1 co 1 = r; I M tw1 O co 2I / I eee'sr4e•w 341 — — OLLOW (r ZOOS zl / / E � \I PROPOSED REST ROOM I I I 11J QZ Q 2Po \. I r'= EXISTING GARAGE/SHOP STRUCTURE to \ TO BE CONVERTED TO COMMERCIAL USE. VICINITY MAP , _c o . I�U D IA\ .o.r..a.a 111116. o I7 A . al NORTH S P Dote. 1-21-02 3 \ 4 Sade: 1..60'SITE PLAN d Drown by Di 6 _ m.o..e.0 i Checked by. J)A fj I 5 -- Job No.: 020104 ahrieu- I° _ 4 Drawing No.: NEIGH. SHEET NO.8 W1'4•'W ,00,' y 1 SIGN IN SHEET NAME ADDRESS PHONE NO. c2 — &fI2/ SLP✓A1ct. C C° Jam► ANteldvaif 74th INDUSTRIAL PARK NIEIGH3ORHOOD IuEETNQ . . ■ Nicoli Engineering , Inc. NW PO Box 23784 (503 97281 • Phone:Oregon,Ti ard 620-2086 • Fax: (503) 684-3636 9 9 (503) February 13, 2002 NEI#: 02-0104 RE: Neighborhood Meeting Minutes FOR: 15715 74th Avenue Tigard, Oregon Tax Map #: 2S112DC Tax Lot #: 1500 The neighborhood meeting was called to order by Jim Andrews of Nicoli Engineering, Inc. at 6 p.m. on Tuesday, February 12. Following are the issued discussed as well as- a list of those in attendance: ISSUES DISCUSSED: 1. Discussed the neighborhood meeting process. 2. Discussed the effectiveness of the neighborhood meeting process. 3. General discussion of the City of Tigard's SDR. process. ATTENDANCE: 1. Jim Andrews, Nicoli Engineering, Inc. 2. Sherman Casper, City of Tigard The meeting was adjourned at approximately 6:30 p.m. X:U-0201041Letters1Pubtice Meeting Minutes.dx 9025 SW Center Street Tigard, OR 97223 — www.nicoliengineering.com u)° CITY of TIGARD c.--- CITY GEOGRAPHIC INFORMATION SYSTEM 1111��o �� AREA NOTIFIED . _ (500') • � REDWOOD LN.. -- - --1 • 111 'EMI 1 mamma *ill�� ':�� ° 'F'R' ' "' FOR: JIM ANDREWS Pillillk 111. J III - Nillilil g Q RE: 2S 112DC-01500 101 _ ,=, ASJiFORD S O , w �,, CC I\ 15117MNeM J Q a KABLE LN Property owner information r+ 1fma1MM > is valid for 3 months from' I \1 T M S1nMa.ai mamma Q the date printed on this map. O t sni;r4 MUM= 111111P 7e1baCNlaa mum' •*+�uwvI�TTT nmattetM a _ "'MME - ���`��� ailemnt ase ` I- ..: w w M t�jON.1 '11' �M M amMaM o 43 w t"," mi.<1111 I2811flN fsmMtaw imam mamma J Q Q` '1"'0-a , N N 1'11,1 N IMM O miasma l rinfCOMHa �� 0 100 200 300 400 500 Feet U. O IL_ Q 1"=389 feet 2. f T '9 n U) �`' i1 City of Tigard k9/1,0 • Information on this map is for general location only and should be verified with the Development Services Division. �yq / 13125 SW Halt Blvd 'r n Q Tigard,OR 97223 (503)639-4171 ,• http://wwvv.ci.tigard.or.us Community Development Plot date:Jan 15,2002;C:lmagic\MAGIC03.APR • Jack Biethan 11023 SW Summerfield Drive, #4 Tigard, OR 97224 Sue Rorman 11250 SW 82nd Avenue Tigard, OR 97223 Naomi Gallucci 11285 SW 78th Avenue Tigard, OR 97223 Michael Trigoboff 7072 SW Barbara Lane Tigard, OR 97223 Dieter Jacobs 7775 SW Spruce Street Tigard, OR 97223 Alexander Craghead 12205 SW Hall Boulevard Tigard, OR 97223-6210 David Chapman 9840 SW Landau Place Tigard, OR 97223 Nathan and Ann Murdock PO Box 231265 Tigard, OR 97281 CITY OF TIGARD m EAST CIT SUBCOMMITTEE (i:\curpin\setup\labels\CIT East.doc) UPDATED: December 27, 2001 Jack Biethan 11023 SW Summerfield Drive, #4 Tigard, OR 97224 Kristen Miller 8940 SW Edgewood Street Tigard, OR 97223 Paul Owen 10335 SW Highland Drive Tigard, OR 97224 Louise Fronville 15760 SW Oak Meadow Lane Tigard, OR 97224 Tim Esav PO Box 230695 Tigard, OR 97281 Nathan and Ann Murdock PO Box 231265 Tigard, OR 97281 Ross Sundberg 16382 SW 104th Avenue Tigard, OR 97224 CITY OF TIGARD - SOUTH CIT SUBCOMMITTEE (pg. I of I) (i:lcurpin\setup\labels\CIT South.doc) UPDATED: January 11, 2002 • 2S112DC-01500 2S112CD-07900 74TH AVENUE INDUSTRIAL PARK LLC DANCHOK INVESTMENT GROUP INC 8100 SW DURHAM RD 8475 SW ERNST RD TIGARD,OR 97224 PORTLAND,OR 97225 2S112CD-00701 S112CD-08300 BLACKWELL JAY M&TRACI N rA OK INVEST + • GROUP INC 15950 SW 76TH 8475 S •D TIGARD,OR 97224 ••RTLAND,OR • 5 2S 112CD-00700 2S 112CD-09100 BOUMAN DONNA L • .OK INVEST o• GROUP INC 15940 SW 76TH AVE 8475 SW •v"_. D TIGARD,OR 97224 •:' AND,OR 9 2S112DC-01600 2S112CD-08100 BOWLES JOHN MARGARET OK INVESTMENT G OUP INC 8986 SW ARAPAHO RD 8475 SW ER TUALATIN,OR 97062 ND,OR 9722 2S 112CD-07300 2S 112CD-08700 BRANSON GREGORY L&LESLIE H • • HOK INVESTME 'OUP INC 15838 SW 76TH AVE 8475 SW '• •■ - TIGARD,OR 97224 P•' - `e, • - 2S112CD-08600 2S112CD-07800 CARICO SUSAN E D' • •• NVESTMENT OUP INC 7570 SW ONNAF CT 8475 SW ER •• TIGARD,OR 97224 - w D,OR 97225 2S 112DC-00200 2S 112CD-08000 CATELLUS DEVELOPMENT CORPORATION K INVESTMENT GROUP INC PROPERTY TAX DEPARTMENT 8475 S 201 MISSION ST RTLAND,OR 972 SAN FRANCISCO,CA 94105 -..1120 C-00201 2S 112CD-03200 CA • LUS DEVELOPME .-•ORATION DAVIS EDWARD L PROPE•- TAX D •-•TMENT 20375 SW 93RD AVE 201 MISS :' T— TUALATIN,OR 97062 S�AN FRANCISCS, _ ; -94105 2S 112CD-00200 2S113AB-00800 CHRISTENSEN PHILLIP E AND DUNCAN JOHN A AND SALLY C JANICE LEE 15685 SW 76TH AVE 7060 SW PALMER WAY TIGARD,OR 97224 BEAVERTON,OR 97007 2S112CD-03000 2S113AB-01600 CUNNINGHAM RONALD R&ANNE C DUNCAN JOHN ARTHUR AND 7685 SW BOND JANICE LEE TIGARD,OR 97224 7060 SW PALMER WAY BEAVERTON,OR 97007 2S112CD-07400 25112CA-13200 ERDMANN LENNY G&CAROL A HOLZGANG CHRISTOPHER R& 15854 SW 76TH AVE MARY ANN TIGARD,OR 97224 15508 SW 76TH AVE TIGARD,OR 97224 2S112CD-09300 2S112CD-07600 FANNO CREEK TOWNHOMES HOWIE GEORGE E&DEBRA A OWNERS OF LOTS 1-11 15876 SW 76TH AVE 8475 SW ERNEST RD TIGARD,OR 97224 PORTLAND,OR 97225 25112CD-09000 2S112CA-13000 -•NO CREEK TOWNH• HUTTON BRIAN D&DEBORAH A OWN • . OF • " -11 15566 SW 76TH AVE 8475 SW • ' '- T RD TIGARD,OR 97224 P•- AND,OR 9 5 2S 112CD-09200 2S 112CD-08200 F• O CREEK TOWNH• S ILTZ JUDITH ANN OWNE- • La -11 7555 SW ONNAF CT 8475 SW - " -D TIGARD,OR 97224 • - LAND,OR 972 28112CD-08900 28112DC-01400 • NO CREEK TOWN • ES JDS LLC& OWN '• •F LO -11 SANTA FE INVESTORS#1 LLC 8475 SW - -- RD C/O PACIFIC SANTA FE CORP P• AND,OR 97 5 17700 SW UPPPER BOONES FERRY RD PORTLAND,OR 97224 2S 112CA-13100 2S 112DB-00800 GIESBRECHT FRANK&HELEN JOHNSON ORVAL D& 15532 SW 76TH AVE REICHEL DAVID L TIGARD,OR 97224 15515 SW 74TH TIGARD, OR 97223 2S112CA-12900 2S 112CD-08500 GOODPASTER RONALD D/STEPHANIE M KASER JEFFREY RAY&PATTI L 15585 SW 76TH AVE 7525 SW ONNAF CT TIGARD,OR 97224 TIGARD,OR 97224 2S 112CD-01000 2S 112CD-00400 HAMBACH MILDRED TRUSTEE KNAUSS HARVEY L 7735 SW DURHAM RD 14383 SW MCFARLAND BLVD TIGARD,OR 97223 TIGARD,OR 97223 2S112CA-12700 2S112CD-03400 HANSEN GLENN M&BRENDA L LAIRD WAYNE E&TRACI L 15622 SW 76TH AVE 7660 SW BOND TIGARD,OR 97224 TIGARD,OR 97223 2S 112CD-00800 2S 112DC-01300 HAVERY JOHN W MADELON LARUSSO CONCRETE COMPANY INC 15970 SW 76TH AVE 15930 SW 74TH AVE TIGARD,OR 97224 TIGARD,OR 97224 2S112CD-08400 2S 112CD-00900 MAGEE KENNETH W RIVAS ERNEST ROSE 7535 SW ONNAF CT 16060 SW 76TH AVE TIGARD,OR 97224 TIGARD,OR 97223 2S 112CD-08800 2S 112CA-08400 MAGEE KENNETH W& SAKAGUCHI MAKOTO&JOAN HALL MAGEE CLAUDIA R 7574 SW ASHFORD ST 7590 SW ONNAF CT TIGARD,OR 97224 TIGARD,OR 97224 2S 112DC-01800 2S 112CD-07700 NADEAU ANDRE R TRUSTEE SANDERS RODNEY E&KANA M 7774 VLAHOS DR 15900 SW 76TH WILSONVILLE,OR 97070 TIGARD,OR 97224 2S 112CD-03300 2S 112CA-12800 NEUFELD DAVID& SCHERER STEPHEN T&JANET K SIMPART LORRI 15610 SW 76TH AVE 15895 SW 76TH AVE TIGARD,OR 97224 TIGARD,OR 97224 2S 112DB-00400 2S 112CA-08600 OR-WASH ENTERPRISES UNLIMITED SHERK CHRISTIAN C&TRUDI L BY JOHN F MEUPERT 7562 SW ASHFORD ST 111 SW 5TH AVE#3400 TIGARD,OR 97224 PORTLAND,OR 97204 2S 112DC-00500 2S1 2DC-01601 PACIFIC REALTY ASSOCIATES TIGA' CIT SF ATTN: M CONZATTI 1312 :r) -ALL 15350 SW SEQUOIA PKWY STE 300 T :ARD,OR 223 PORTLAND,OR 97224 2S 112DC-00100 2S 112CA-13400 PACIFIC REALTY ASSOCIATES TIGA OF 15350 SW SEQUOIA PKWY#300-WMI 1312 LL PORTLAND,OR 97224 TI RD,OR 9 3 2S112CD-00300 2 12CA-11900 PATTON KENT D&AMY SAGER TIGA C F 160 TIMBERLAKE 131 ALL ASHLAND,OR 97520 TI ARD,OR 23 2S 112CA-08300 2S 112CD-03500 QUANG YEN SUSAN&HAU HOWARD WAGNER ERNST J 7582 SW ASHFORD ST 7680 SW BOND TIGARD,OR 97224 TIGARD,OR 97224 112CA-13300 2S112C0-03100 RE • SANC s•D NO.2 WALTON WILLIAM TODD&MARY FRAN OWNS' . OTS 54-55 7655 SW BOND ST TIGARD,OR 97224 , 2S112CA-08500 WHITE PAUL& HELEN 7633 SW ASHFORD ST TIGARD,OR 97224 2S 112CA-08200 WINDER SCOTT R&KAREN B 7588 SW ASHFORD ST TIGARD,OR 97224 1 � 3 CITY OF TIGARD COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT PLANNING DIVISION CITY OF flOARL) Community cDevefopmeut 1312S SW HALL BOULEVARD Shaping A Better Community TIGARD, OREGON 97223 �Cr�s�l i c PHONE: 503-639.4111 FAIL 503-604-7291(Attn: Peeeo,5i irkerAttning) E. OF. T FOR. x'00- 'OUT IOP[RT OWNER MAILING. [ Property owner information is valid for 3 months from the date of your request INDICATE ALL PROJECT MAP & TAX LOT NUMBERS (i.e. 15134AB, Tax Lot 00100) OR THE ADDRESSES FOR ALL PROJECT PARCELS BELOW and INCLUDE A MAP OF ALL LOTS FOR THE PROJECT (preferably assessor's tax map): IA_ MAP 2S11. 9- 1c) 151 [ L 5,W 4 • jT� - Ca INDICATE WHETHER YOU ARE REQUESTING 2 OR 3 SETS OF LABELS: 3 (NOTE: A minimum of 2 sets of labels will be provided to place on your 2 sets of envelopes that applicants are required to submit at the time of application submittal. If a neighborhood meeting is required and you have not yet held that meeting, you should request 3 sets) NAME OF CONTACT PERSON: U I HN1_ w _tom—a.__ PHONE: a.p� � (.o?-O - 20 (r_ This request may be mailed, faxed, or hand delivered to the City of Tigard. Please allow a 2-day minimum for processing requests. Upon completion of your request, the contact person will be called to pick up their request in "Will Call" by their last name, at the Community Development Reception Desk. The cost of processing your request must be paid at the time of pick up, as exact cost can not be pre-determined. PLEASE NOTE: FOR REASONS OF ACCURACY, ONLY ORIGINAL MAILING LABELS PROVIDED BY THE CITY VS. RE-TYPED MAILING LABELS WILL BE ACCEPTED. ost_Description: $11 to generate the mailing list. plus $2 per sheet for printing the list onto labels (20 addresses per sheet). Then, multiply the cost to pnnt one set of labels by the number of sets requested_ *EXAMPLE * * * COST FOR THIS REQUEST * * sheets of labels x S2/sheet = St1.44 x sets = $16.00 �.- sheet(s) of labels x S2/sheet = � x sets = S.A.4 Z sheets of labels x S2/sheet for CIT area x 2 sets = S 4.00 sheet(s) of labels x S2/sheet for CIT area = S_t-1 x sets = $I GENERATE UST - slum GENERATE UST - S i 1.00 TOTAL = $31.00 TOTAL = S y / gfv-1 .°I v??:nL -bL-Nw 'ocor bgo Cr1C •' T nr. ru��nirr.r.i� rte.. r. ., .,�. SENT BY: NICOLI ENGINEERING, INC 503 684 3636; JAN- 02 10:22AM; .PAGE 2/3 0 r a i ii !Ifl1 ii 5 V ; 9 a If; IE 5 • t1 f a r *1 p t r-I p+��nii'AM!" '' r .. '. ...p "'. !i�.yN ,r 7. R �,4 °ky'3fwi � �Y Y r "' ;,,.e„ i a t. bj 1p^11, '41AM,:„F an k• fr( g a s le r{ nt , rra ' c t - q1.' ,ery�Y! i.<tMaIMN .t J A�'_, y t r r ... t , N.S�!" ' S r.y'� _ — r' T� r Jre°'C4 "1axa:34i$;,. ,�• , sk. "'f 'F�, ,-„,rr r 4'K4s`'.„.. S jor �1 r _ MZi�'Yt-` , r 1 , "','pb1'.-1 Jr V.+., ` ' .. `'fie++1�'`r 44 °S are, .kN t rr I -,K Yt -"4:1'.1:11---4 �,Z:b.a 1 3 4- c7y } ',§r, ,•:y r. � br a"� 'h,.l `^'"� e++y �.t �, '.�/..,t, 'o- rS a , 11. 1, E•'a,-.rQ,4,.. , ' w *Y1�K-{��^. �4• �''�.+.t 1,.'I{� 1� > r X.fl,' r � � vlMf' , ,�jli: t,h J `}��r�. Z y y t y,..n9 3 � ; 1 o b i0:x'.-k.--." / `4rrM'�C, lr ,,yI p ' �'4:: r< v 84, P17W y';'.:' j a I t R, ' ' s 1 '��;� ��3`r��y`�Lr, c' � ' ?�lF F'44S ���?n.y`i'o da*��S „••i2'e�l��jg7q���l.",}' � �I T 4 �'rM' S1- : ,r } s:; � .4 Tv .1.° •r4e .R(�,s•� yTs " SF $ �..t •..1+1,1`�a∎•. J°r ( t ,w.ak a 1r 1 ,� .j',s?. .r I rL9 ne .i J 1 y ArK ,�1 �V afwvt r r.' { � iS!"�'',� I ', '�>' p.11�1 qty r,j 1�4�.y .•,K �:1. '' :v..• ..a,--1,!,—',:4,r yt tiro...;; t ~ ..,,7%.;,;•4,,....L."%"a `� Lr 7"'ti�Waa r.. .,;•sy. +, �} yid. 2'` : 'r ' ..r' D'it`.r'si+ + J, ., j;1_. miL.esd�s?a_ts ''S aL 7e}.yd•', p,* 4. 'w.ti, t }t er ,r '" tk j,Si' , ..SGR':, ,Vr�y ti �v r� . l:�`.f ��C2y*.: .y+' „ ��. �' ,� 11. t 2 c+t •a,�1{fJl.� o-r ti i t � i ''fj ' ti# :'.:. ir, i i r'0CI�X .n ..ow. N'•s3r` . ^...n e ; +.Eweµ! s"r44 1; ,3,-,,0 +a', ; '{;=:15 a.�.i ¢ a r r i t .. f ' c-.'a':: rp� Y� a ' ,r',;�2 n.,�.di,i6.�.: .n'44 ._.,;4 1....,t4,„,1}Jrr -A ''e4 L�' ,...:'....,, .` '' [��. .44 ',y i'Vr` •?aNA, t � m,,ri+r 94 }t r ,. w f� p k�, a v ��eY4,. .a: n ,...,... ,+`..% r � i f r r✓p�C t.r 974/ t--.1 ''`" ^i�-'°'C r ,,"'+;. _-•%• a 2 :' ' a Q er.,,y,,..V„ s∎N''P.lSs�r t• t t". _HK P,y>i+ 1'f+w e,Mr>n: t, n►.1.'::•.".. k f t l'i �K S T h r h d ( C r i1° «`r: �,:�i �. ' s ,� leo. t t t,., , ,i, , dry $:r:,...:?7 it ,' t 'I.1,-; t ar � ,a .:1 r ir?�F r �rT yf '`� 1 j,'. a t� C�LR�+(�t t��' y �, ^y� ^+ "!• "rA ;�(}^'',,,l+' 4 Ti N'r'.! r• r".Gr fcA a '..f...10PAsila4k, ':• ''' W. n ti !,wi'irY&,4"i17. t_ 'tw' ,•-�!`t - ( ;'. o.at,tn� i ttr C- '., . , :,Fs'.':-',= AM.',Y! aid e. -TKO �•• r, '?1" r 'Pi34 c1s i s∎A j,1 .•• t •.ti k, . SA'7!! 1 Y.,t2a du. ;„,%/...o.b N. 'J� "` 511'4!•r, w �i wV >r. -,R . / QK , ig11 ri f r ''u i S":,...,.1,1.,z, t5 :1,- r{ ..=:,:k.,,,_;:2,,,.... `°�`?•MV ‘,;,%.. i . ;1; . ,.k.,..; 7-ilfg.,r:, ',,,%;),: !--;' ,Igittiy-',-;:tfr,/:.;', ',ri-'4a&a. .;h-tc,44h,.„-.,...1 1:tr.:f.:, :: . , ' ' • 4 1'''FRt Z � ,. r. 1. i • 40. i .57r V'!y'' 1 lr ,,,� 4l t t ir. I 5z.-..-, V N i i, l� h, �r f�.,, r.�. N: ('r tlri_ _n 91311 r wan .ra ero \°,t "'''t„.,.' 1 'f ✓ ' 4 r i t . a.•44 '' t ! i71�� '�ti+ '' �. 'e `RtS,+'v>; RI.:a';';∎44St ,y�r'�p T r 1 �7A 1, t tS'y tJ�R,, t.;'r`,,,. a,,, aj> ..,`{,:"5,, ]I1;i', " •t• iG!3tk "cF�' .ij\1�'145';1r i �, C�7t11.11+d�11 a�^i 11 } .".. jI R }!N4 :9E� I� A. SENT BY: ,NICOLI ENGINEERING, INC. 503 684 3636; JAN- '2 10:23AM; PAGE 3/3 70 lk lIS MI ' can+o V.111-IS•wo.WS EN uILIa YYOOdIQk!AON aIV ion ` . j usvo rwc` AM 3AV 4WL i I''�` r, t ----•---•------_-•------•--•---- RAILROAD ----J�-'_~ � �' � OREGON ELECTRIC ^-_ _ _ 1. r — — — — — — — — s.w, 74TH AVER_�_ — - S a C ::.,t Er— in , 7: 6. i E mi-11 1 i EL 1 LI fkad frivilip it oh:= //1 CO / z if Ir: • . I l 11 .t•:, i / .- ./...__r ,. •.... l �1 !hi/ g ! ) i 11 .... ... p b \ N i J • � �fLt� - i.K�/a N y urn UNIFIED SEWERAGE AGENCY OF WASHINGTON COUNTY July 24, 2000 Nicoli Engineering, Inc. ATTN: Jim Andrews 9025 SW Center Street PO Box 23784 Tigard, Oregon 97223 RE: New Restroom for the 74th Avenue Industrial Park at 15715 SW Durham Road in Tigard, Oregon (Tax Map 2S112DC: Tax Lot 01500) Dear Mr ndrews: . ( ty°\ The Unified Sewerage Agency (Agency) has received the information regarding the above referenced project. Based on the information sensitive areas, as defined by Section 1.02.49 of the Agency Design and Construction Standards (R&O 007) exist on the project site (i.e. Fanno Creek). Since the proposed restroom will be placed over existing impervious surface area (i.e. asphalt) and is located a minimum of 200 feet from the sensitive area, the Agency has determined that the project does not significantly affect water quality. Consequently, a Service Provide Letter is not needed for this project. All required permits and approvals must be obtained and completed under applicable local, state, and federal law. This letter does NOT eliminate the need to protect sensitive areas if they are subsequently identified on your site. If you have any questions, please feel free to call me at 503-846-3795. Sincerely, S. Alison Rhea Site Assessment Coordinator \\MO SERV_03\eng$\Development Svcs\SP 00-7\Misc Corrospondence\2S 112DC 1500-Restroom Addition.doc 155 North First Avenue, Suite 270, MS 10 Phone: 503/648-8621 Hillsboro, Oregon 97124-3072 FAX: 503/640-3525 `PST First American Title Insurance Company of Oregon exFR,c E • �``4; •'• ti An assumed baseness named TITLE INSURANCE COMPANY OF OREGON zg REGIONAL COMMERCIAL DIVISION 200 S.W. Market St., Suite 250 Portland, Oregon 97201-5786 (503) 795-7600 National 1-800-929-3651 Fax (503) 795-7614 CLOSING STATEMENT Escrow: 02160054 Order: 951412 Escrow Officer: Judy Yoresen Date: 2/14/2002 FINAL Closing Date: 2/14/2002 ESCROW STATEMENT OF: 74th Avenue Industrial Park, LLC Property Address: 15715 SW 74th Ave, Tigard, OR 97223 ITEMS DEBITS CREDITS NEW LOAN TO Washington Mutual Bank 1, 736, 500.00 TITLE CHARGES TO First American Title Company EXTENDED Mortgagee' s Premium for $1, 736,500 .00 2,590.00 Endorsements 100.00 Loan Recording Fees 94 .00 Government Service Charge 50.00 ESCROW CHARGES Escrow Fee 500 .00 FAX/Delivery Fees 60.00 LENDER CHARGES 1EW LOAN CHARGES TO Washington Mutual Bank Loan Fee 9,240.00 Flood Determination 11.00 LOAN PAYOFF TO: Washington Mutual Bank Loan Payoff - In full 1, 638, 076.91 DOTAL LOAN PAYOFF 1, 638,076.91 ADDITIONAL DISBURSEMENTS ?econveyarce Fee to First American Title Post Closing 100.00 3ALANCE DUE YOU 85, 678.09 TOTALS $ 1, 736,500 .00 $ 1,736,500 .00 '4th Avenue Industrial Park, LLC 3Y: BY: James Castile, Managing Member Audrey Castile, Managing Member 7/1/01 TO 6/3..102 REAL PROPERTY TAX ..I'ATEMENT WASHINGTON COUNTY OREGON • 155 N FIRST AVE., RM 130 • HILLSBORO, OREGON 97124 . PROPERTY DESCRIPTION MAP: 2S112DC-01500 ACCOUNT NO: R513439 SITUS: 15615-15797 SW 74TH AVE CODE AREA: 023.74 'LINO CREEK ACRE TRACTS, LOT PTS 3-6, ACRES 4.61 2001-2002 CURRENT TAX BY DISTRICT: PORTLAND COMMUNITY COLLEGE 407.64 ESD - NW REGIONAL 221.69 TIGARD SCHOOL DISTRICT 7,191.58 SD #23-TIGARD LOL 1,441.43 EDUCATION TAXES: $9,262.34 WASHINGTON COUNTY 3,238.89 74TH AVENUE INDUSTRIAL PARK LLC WASHINGTON COUNTY - LOL 646.77 8100 SW DURHAM RD METRO SERVICE DISTRICT 139.24 •TIGARD, OR 97224 PORT OF PORTLAND 101.04 • TV FIRE & RESCUE 2,198.47 VALUES: LAST YEAR THIS YEAR TV FIRE & RESCUE - LOL 360.36 MARKET VALUES: CITY OF TIGARD 3,622.46 LAND 419, 960 439, 220 GENERAL GOVERNMENT TAXES: $10,307.23 STRUCTURE 1,968,490 1, 884, 390 TOTAL RMV VALUE 2,388, 450 2,323, 610 BOND-WASHINGTON COUNTY 383 .28 TAXABLE VALUES: BOND-METRO SERVICE DIST 327 .64 ASSESSED VALUE 1,399,450 1,441,430 BOND-PORT OF PORTLAND 0.86 BOND-PCC 386.74 BOND-SD #23-TIGARD 1,510.04 PROPERTY TAXES: $21,027 .17 $22, 547 .28 BOND-TV FIRE & RESCUE 76.54 BOND-CITY OF TIGARD 94.85 APPEAL DEADLINE December 31, 2001 BOND-TRI-MET 197.76 "glue Questions Call 503-846-8826 BOND PAYMENT TAXES: $2,977.71 Questions Call 503-846-8801 Other Questions Call 503-846-8741 2001-02 TAX (Before Discount) $22, 547.28 Refer to the insert for more jnformation PROPERTY TAX PAYMENT OPTIONS (See back of Statement for payment instructions.) Pay Due Discount Net Amount Due In Full 11/15/01 676.42 $21,870.86 2/3 11/15/01 300.63 $14,730.89 DELINQUENT TAXES: 1/3 11/15/01 NONE $7,515.76 NO DELINQUENT TAXES DUE PLEASE MAKE PAYMENT TO: Washington County Tax (See back for explanation of taxes marked with an asterisk ('). Delinquent Tax Total is included in payment options to the left.) TOTAL (After Discount): $21,870.86 a Tear Here PLEASE RETURN THIS PORTION WITH PAYMENT - SEE BACK OF STATEMENT FOR INSTRUCTIONS 1 Tear Here 2001-2002 Property Tax Payment Stub WASHINGTON COUNTY, OREGON (ACCOUNT NO: R513439 SITUS: 15615-15797 SW 74TH AVE Mailing address change or name change on back of stub. Unpaid DELINQUENT TAX DUE IS INCLUDED IN PAYMENT OPTIONS. FULL PAYMENT (Includes 3% Discount) DUE: 11-15-01 $21,870.86 2/3 PAYMENT (Includes 2% Discount) DUE: 11-15-01 $14,730.89 1/3 PAYMENT (No Discount Offered) DUE: 11-15-01 $$7,515.76 $7,551155.76 DISCOUNT IS LOST& INTEREST APPLIES AFTER DUE DATE. Please Make Payment to: WASHINGTON COUNTY ENTER AMOUNT PAID Property Tax Payment Center P. 0. Box 3587 74TH AVENUE INDUSTRIAL PARK LLC Portland, OR 97208-3587 8100 SW DURHAM RD TIGARD, OR 97224 34000015134390002187086000147308900007515767 CITY OF TIGARD PRE-APPLICATION CITY of RDI!OREGON Community CONFERENCE NOTES shaping A ter Community (Pre-Application Meeting Notes are Valid for Six (6) Months) NON-RESIDENTIAL 3mE of 23,E sTFA : -�_ / APPLICANT: 1'K, ily -P>/ti¢,c AGENT: _ Phone: ( ) Phone: ( ) PROPERTY LOCATION: ADDRESS/GENERAL LOCATION: / 7/S— S' W TAX MAP(S)/LOT#(S): _? ":227)r., - ce NECESSARY APPLICATIONS: S. � � � t,r PROPOSAL DESCRIPTION: iii' ems,,; `s c� �o�aLaue/� COMPREHENSIVE PLAN MAP DESIGNATION: ! _ _ ZONING MAP DESIGNATION: (47---17),-7.-ze, Q,� CITIZEN INVOLVEMENT TEAM (C.I.T.)AREA: ZONING DISTRICT DIMENSIONAL REQUIREMENTS (Refer to Code Section 18.53 D 1 MINIMUM LOT SIZE: - sq. ft. Average Min. lot width: - ft. Max. building height: 5`S ft. Setbacks: Front ft. Side ''U ft. Rear ft. Corner ft. from street. MAXIMUM SITE COVERAGE: z % Minimum landscaped or natural vegetation area: NEIGHBORHOOD MEETING [Refer to the Neighborhood Meeting Handout] THE APPLICANT SHALL NOTIFY ALL PROPERTY OWNERS WITHIN 500 FEET AND THE APPROPRIATE CIT FACILITATOR AND THE MEMBERS OF ANY LAND USE SUBCOMMITTEE(S) of their proposal. A minimum of two (2) weeks between the mailing date and the meeting date is required. Please review the Land Use Notification handout concerning site posting and the meeting notice. Meeting is to be held prior to submitting your application or the application will not be accepted. * NOTE: In order to also preliminarily address building code standards, a meeting with a Plans Examiner is encouraged prior to submittal of a land use application. CITY OF TIGARD Pre-Application Conference Notes Page 1 of 9 NON-Residential Application/Planning Division Section NI NARRATIVE [Refer to Code Chapter 18.3901 The APPLICANT SHALL SUBMIT A NARRATIVE which provides findings based on the applicable approval standards. Failure to provide a narrative or adequately address criteria would be reason to consider an application incomplete and delay review of the proposal. The applicant should review the code for applicable criteria. t. :I IMPACT STUDY (Refer to Code Sections 18.390.040 and 18.390.050) As a part of the APPLICATION SUBMITTAL REQUIREMENTS, applicants are required to INCLUDE IMPACT STUDY with their submittal package. The impact study shall quantify the effect of the development on public facilities and services. The study shall address, at a minimum, the transportation system, including bikeways, the drainage system, the parks system, the water system, the sewer system and the noise impacts of the development. For each public facility system and type of impact, the study shall propose improvements necessary to meet City standards, and to minimize the impact of the development on the public at large, public facilities systems, and affected private property users. In situations where the Community Development Code requires the dedication of real property interests, the applicant shall either specifically concur with the dedication requirement, or provide evidence which supports the conclusion that the real property dedication requirement is not roughly proportional to the projected impacts of the development. [ACCESS [Refer to Chapters 18.705 and 18.765) Minimum number of accesses: Minimum access width: Minimum pavement width: All driveways and parking areas, except for some fleet storage parking areas, must be paved. Drive-in use queuing areas: tZ WALKWAY REQUIREMENTS (Refer to Code Section 18.705.030) WALKWAYS SHALL EXTEND FROM THE GROUND FLOOR ENTRANCES OR FROM THE GROUND FLOOR LANDING OF STAIRS, ramps, or elevators of all commercial, institutional, and industrial uses, to the streets which provide the required access and egress. Walkways shall provide convenient connections between buildings in multi-building commercial, institutional, and industrial complexes. Unless impractical, walkways should be constructed between a new development and neighboring developments. SPECIAL SETBACKS (Refer to Code Chapter 18.130) STREETS: feet from the centerline of • LOWER INTENSITY ZONES: feet, along the site's boundary. FLAG LOT: 10-FOOT SIDE YARD SETBACK. I I SPECIAL BUILDING HEIGHT PROVISIONS [Refer to Code Section 18.730.010.83 BUILDING HEIGHT EXCEPTIONS - Buildings located in a non-residential zone may be built to a height of 75 feet provided that: • A maximum building floor area to site area ratio (FAR) of 1.5 to 1 will exist; All actual building setbacks will be at least half (1/2) of the building's height; and • The structure will not abut a residential zoned district. Fl BUFFERING AND SCREENING [Refer to Code Chapter 18.745) In order TO INCREASE PRIVACY AND TO EITHER REDUCE OR ELIMINATE ADVERSE NOISE OR VISUAL IMPACTS between adjacent developments, especially between different land uses, the City requires landscaped buffer areas along certain site perimeters. Required buffer areas are described by the Code in terms of width. Buffer areas must be occupied by a mixture of deciduous and evergreen trees and shrubs and must also achieve a balance between vertical and horizontal plantings. Site obscuring screens or fences may also be required; these are often advisable even if not required by the Code. The required buffer areas may only be occupied by vegetation, fences, utilities, and walkways. Additional information on required buffer area materials and sizes may be found in the Development Code. CITY OF TIGARD Pre-Application Conference Notes Page 2 of 9 NON-Residential Application/Planning Division Section The ESTIMATED REQUIRED BUFFER WIDTHS applicable to your proposal area are: feet along north boundary. feet along east boundary. feet along south boundary. feet along west boundary. IN ADDITION, SIGHT OBSCURING SCREENING IS REQUIRED ALONG: kr LANDSCAPING (Refer to Code Chapters 18.745,18.165 and 183051 STREET TREES ARE REQUIRED FOR ALL DEVELOPMENTS FRONTING ON A PUBLIC OR PRIVATE STREET as well as driveways which are more than 100 feet in length. Street trees must be placed either within the public right-of-way or on private property within six (6) feet of the right-of- way boundary. Street trees must have a minimum caliper of at least two (2) inches when measured four (4) feet above grade. Street trees should be spaced 20 to 40 feet apart depending on the branching width of the proposed tree species at maturity. Further information on regulations affecting street trees may be obtained from the Planning Division. A MINIMUM OF ONE (1) TREE FOR EVERY SEVEN (7) PARKING SPACES MUST BE PLANTED in and around all parking areas in order to provide a vegetative canopy effect. Landscaped parking areas shall include special design features which effectively screen the parking lot areas from view. These design features may include the use of landscaped berms, decorative walls, and raised planters. For detailed information on design requirements for parking areas and accesses. RECYCLING [Refer to Code Chapter 18.755) Applicant should CONTACT FRANCHISE HAULER FOR REVIEW AND APPROVAL OF SITE SERVICING COMPATIBILITY. Locating a trash/recycling enclosure within a clear vision area such as at the intersection of two (2) driveways within a parking lot is prohibited. Much of Tigard is within Pride Disposal's Service area. Lenny Hing is the contact person and can be reached at (503) 625-6177. N. PARKING (Refer to Code Section 18.765.0401 REQUIRED parking for this type of use: A54 @ //41-ec- I i Parking SHOWN on preliminary plan(s): SECONDARY USE REQUIRED parking: Parking SHOWN on preliminary plan(s): NO MORE THAN 50% OF REQUIRED SPACES MAY BE DESIGNATED AND/OR DIMENSIONED AS COMPACT SPACES. PARKING STALLS shall be dimensioned as follows: Standard parking space dimensions: 8 feet, 6 inches x 18 feet, 6 inches. Compact parking space dimensions: 7 feet, 6 inches x 16 feet, 6 inches. Note: Parking space width includes the width of a stripe that separates the parking space from an adjoining space. Note: A maximum of three (3)feet of the vehicle overhang area in front of a wheel stop or curb can be included as part of required parking space depth. This area cannot be included as landscaping for meeting the minimum percentage requirements. HANDICAPPED PARKING: All parking areas shall PROVIDE APPROPRIATELY LOCATED AND DIMENSIONED DISABLED PERSON PARKING spaces. The minimum number of disabled person parking spaces to be provided, as well as the parking stall dimensions, are mandated by the Americans with Disabilities Act (ADA). A handout is available upon request. A handicapped parking space symbol shall be painted on the parking space surface and an appropriate sign shall be posted. BICYCLE RACKS ARE REQUIRED FOR MULTI-FAMILY, COMMERCIAL AND INDUSTRIAL DEVELOPMENTS. Bicycle racks shall be located in areas protected from automobile traffic and in convenient locations. I LOADING AREA REQUIREMENTS (Refer to Code Section 18.165.0801 Every COMMERCIAL OR INDUSTRIAL BUILDING IN EXCESS OF 10,000 SQUARE FEET shall be provided with a loading space. The space size and location shall be as approved by the City Engineer. CITY OF TIGARD Pre-Application Conference Notes Page 3 of 9 NON-Residential Application/Planning Division Section r BICYCLE RACKS (Refer to Code Section 18.7651 BICYCLE RACKS are required FOR MULTI-FAMILY, COMMERCIAL AND INDUSTRIAL DEVELOPMENTS. Bicycle racks shall be located in areas protected from automobile traffic and in convenient locations. SENSITIVE LANDS (Refer to Code Chapter 18.7151 The Code provides REGULATIONS FOR LANDS WHICH ARE POTENTIALLY UNSUITABLE FOR kb \‘7.1 DEVELOPMENT DUE TO AREAS WITHIN THE 100-YEAR FLOODPLAIN, NATURAL DRAINAGEWAYS, WETLAND AREAS, ON SLOPES IN EXCESS OF 25 PERCENT, OR ON 0,4-- B,ti- UNSTABLE GROUND. Staff will attempt to preliminary identify sensitive lands areas at the pre- application conference based on available information. HOWEVER, the responsibility to precisely y\`'''� identify sensitive land areas, and their boundaries, is the responsibility of the applicant. Areas meeting the definitions of sensitive lands must be clearly indicated on plans submitted with the development application. Chapter 18.775 also provides regulations for the use, protection, or modification of sensitive lands areas. RESIDENTIAL DEVELOPMENT IS PROHIBITED WITHIN FLOODPLAINS. I I STEEP SLOPES (Refer to Code Section 18.175.080.C1 When STEEP SLOPES exist, prior to issuance of a final order, a geotechnical report must be submitted which addresses the approval standards of the Tigard Community Development Code Section 18.775.080.C. The report shall be based upon field exploration and investigation and shall include specific recommendations for achieving the requirements of Section 18.775.080.C. CLEANWATER SERVICES[CWSI BUFFER STANDARDS (Refer to R a 0 96-44/USA Regulations-Chapter 31 LAND DEVELOPMENT ADJACENT TO SENSITIVE AREAS shall preserve and maintain or create a vegetated corridor for a buffer wide enough to protect the water quality functioning of the sensitive area. Design Criteria: The VEGETATED CORRIDOR WIDTH is dependent on the sensitive area. The following table identifies the required widths: TABLE 3.1 VEGETATED CORRIDOR WIDTHS SOURCE: CWS DESIGN AND CONSTRUCTION STANDARDS MANUAL/RESOLUTION & ORDER 96-44 SENSITIVE AREA DEFINITION SLOPE ADJACENT WIDTH OF VEGETATED TO SENSITIVE AREA4 CORRIDOR PER SIDE5 • Streams with intermittent flow draining: <25% 15 feet 0 10 to <50 acres 0 >50 to <100 acres 25 feet • Existing or created wetlands <0.5 acre 25 feet • Existing or created wetlands >0.5 acre <25% 50 feet • Rivers, streams, and springs with year-round flow • Streams with intermittent flow draining >100 acres • Natural lakes and ponds • Streams with intermittent flow draining: >25% 30 feet * 10 to <50 acres >50 to <100 acres 50 feet • Existing or created wetlands >25% Variable from 50-200 feet. Measure • Rivers, streams, and springs with year-round flow in 25-foot increments from the starting • Streams with intermittent flow draining >100 acres point to the top of ravine (break in • Natural lakes and ponds <25%slope), add 35 feet past the top of ravine' 4Starting point for measurement = edge of the defined channel (bankful flow) for streams/rivers, delineated wetland boundary, delineated spring boundary, and/or average high water for lakes or ponds, whichever offers greatest resource protection. Intermittent springs, located a minimum of 15 feet within the river/stream or wetland vegetated corridor,shall not serve as a starting point for measurement. 5Vegetated corridor averaging or reduction is allowed only when the vegetated corridor is certified to be in a marginal or degraded condition. 6The vegetated corridor extends 35 feet from the top of the ravine and sets the outer boundary of the vegetated corridor. The 35 feet may be reduced to 15 feet,if a stamped geotechnical report confirms slope stability shall be maintained with the reduced setback from the top of ravine. CITY OF TIGARD Pre-Application Conference Notes Page 4 of 9 NON Residential Application/Planning Division Section Restrictions in the Vegetate Corridor: NO structures, development, construction activities, gardens, lawns, application of chemicals, dumping of any materials of any kind, or other activities shall be permitted which otherwise detract from the water quality protection provided by the vegetated corridor, except as provided for in the CWS Design and Construction Standards. Location of Vegetated Corridor: IN ANY RESIDENTIAL DEVELOPMENT WHICH CREATES MULTIPLE PARCELS or lots intended for separate ownership, such as a subdivision, the vegetated corridor shall be contained in a separate tract, and shall not be a part of any parcel to be used for the construction of a dwelling unit. CWS Service Provider Letter: PRIOR TO SUBMITTAL of any land use applications, the applicant must obtain a CWS Service Provider Letter which will outline the conditions necessary to comply with the R&O 96-44 sensitive area requirements. If there are no sensitive areas, CWS must still issue a letter stating a CWS Service Provider Letter is not required. T1 SIGNS (Refer to Code Chapter 18.780) SIGN PERMITS MUST BE OBTAINED PRIOR TO INSTALLATION OF ANY SIGN in the City of Tigard. A "Guidelines for Sign Permits" handout is available upon request. Additional sign area or height beyond Code standards may be permitted if the sign proposal is reviewed as part of a development review application. Alternatively, a Sign Code Exception application may be filed for Director's review. [j TREE REMOVAL PLAN REQUIREMENTS (Refer to Code Section 18.790.030.CJ A TREE PLAN FOR THE PLANTING, REMOVAL AND PROTECTION OF TREES prepared by a certified arborist shall be provided for any lot, parcel or combination of lots or parcels for which a development application for a subdivision, partition, site development review, planned development, or conditional use is filed. Protection is preferred over removal where possible. THE TREE PLAN SHALL INCLUDE the following: ➢ Identification of the location, size and species of all existing trees including trees designated as significant by the City; ➢ Identification of a program to save existing trees or mitigate tree removal over 12 inches in caliper. Mitigation must follow the replacement guidelines of Section 18.790.060.D according to the following standards and shall be exclusive of trees required by other development code provisions for landscaping, streets and parking lots: Retainage of less than 25% of existing trees over 12 inches in caliper requires a mitigation program according to Section 18.150.070.D. of no net loss of trees; Retainage of from 25 to 50% of existing trees over 12 inches in caliper requires that two- thirds of the trees to be removed be mitigated according to Section 18.790.060.D.; �1 Retainage of from 50 to 75% of existing trees over 12 inches in caliper requires that 50% of the trees to be removed be mitigated according to Section 18.790.060.D.; Retainage of 75% or greater of existing trees over 12 inches in caliper requires no mitigation; ➢ Identification of all trees which are proposed to be removed; and ➢ A protection program defining standards and methods that will be used by the applicant to protect trees during and after construction. • TREES REMOVED WITHIN THE PERIOD OF ONE (1) YEAR PRIOR TO A DEVELOPMENT APPLICATION LISTED ABOVE will be inventoried as part of the tree plan above and will be replaced according to Section 18.790.060.D. . MITIGATION (Refer to Code Section 18.790.060.EJ REPLACEMENT OF A TREE shall take place according to the following guidelines: • A replacement tree shall be a substantially similar species considering site characteristics. ➢ If a replacement tree of the species of the tree removed or damages is not reasonably available, the Director may allow replacement with a different species of equivalent natural resource value. CITY OF TIGARD Pre-Application Conference Notes Page 5 of 9 NON Residential Application/Planning Division Section If a replacement tree of the size cut is not reasonably available on the local market or would not be viable, the Director shall require replacement with more than one tree in accordance with the following formula: The number of replacement trees required shall be determined by dividing the estimated caliper size of the tree removed or damaged, by the caliper size of the largest reasonably available replacement trees. If this number of trees cannot be viably located on the subject property, the Director may require one (1) or more replacement trees to be planted on other property within the city, either public property or, with the consent of the owner, private property. ➢ The planting of a replacement tree shall take place in a manner reasonably calculated to allow growth to maturity. IN LIEU OF TREE REPLACEMENT under Subsection D of this section, a party may, with the consent of the Director, elect to compensate the City for its costs in performing such tree replacement. n CLEAR VISION AREA (Refer to Code Chapter 18.7951 The City requires that CLEAR VISION AREAS BE MAINTAINED BETWEEN THREE (3) AND EIGHT (8) FEET IN HEIGHT at road/driveway, road/railroad, and road/road intersections. The size of the required clear vision area depends upon the abutting street's functional classification and any existing obstructions within the clear vision area. ❑ WATER RESOURCES OVERLAY DISTRICT (Refer to Code Section 18.797.0301 The WATER RESOURCES (WR) OVERLAY DISTRICT implements the policies of the Tigard Comprehensive Plan and is intended to resolve conflicts between development and conservation of significant wetlands, streams and riparian corridors identified in the City of Tigard Local Wetlands Inventory. Specifically, this chapter allows reasonable economic use of property while establishing clear and objective standards to: protect significant wetlands and streams; limit development in designated riparian corridors; maintain and enhance water quality; maximize flood storage capacity; preserve native plant cover; minimize streambank erosion; maintain and enhance fish and wildlife habitats; and conserve scenic, recreational and educational values of water resource areas. Safe Harbor: The WR OVERLAY DISTRICT ALSO MEETS THE REQUIREMENTS OF STATEWIDE PLANNING GOAL 5 (Natural Resources) and the "safe harbor" provisions of the Goal 5 administrative rule (OAR 660, Division 23). These provisions require that "significant" wetlands and riparian corridors be mapped and protected. The Tualatin River, which is also a "fish-bearing stream," has an average annual flow of more than 1000 cfs. Major Streams: Streams which are mapped as "FISH-BEARING STREAMS" by the Oregon Department of Forestry and have an average annual flow less than 1000 cubic feet per second (cfs). ➢ Major streams in Tigard include FANNO CREEK, ASH CREEK (EXCEPT THE NORTH FORK AND OTHER TRIBUTARY CREEKS) AND BALL CREEK. Minor Streams: Streams which are NOT "FISH-BEARING STREAMS" according to Oregon Department of Forestry maps . Minor streams in Tigard include Summer Creek, Derry Dell Creek, Red Rock Creek, North Fork of Ash Creek and certain short tributaries of the Tualatin River. Riparian Setback Area: This AREA IS MEASURED HORIZONTALLY FROM AND PARALLEL TO MAJOR STREAM OR TUALATIN RIVER TOP-OF-BANKS, OR THE EDGE OF AN ASSOCIATED WETLAND, whichever is greater. The riparian setback is the same as the "riparian corridor boundary" in OAR 660-23- 090(1)(d). ➢ The standard TUALATIN RIVER RIPARIAN SETBACK IS 75 FEET, unless modified in accordance with this chapter. ➢ The MAJOR STREAMS RIPARIAN SETBACK IS 50 FEET, unless modified in accordance with this chapter. CITY OF TIGARD Pre-Application Conference Notes Page 6 of 9 NON-Residential Application/Planning Division Section ISOLATED WETLANDS AND MINOR STREAMS (including adjacent wetlands) have no riparian setback; however, a 25-foot "water quality buffer" is required under Cleanwater Services (CWS) standards adopted and administered by the City of Tigard. I RIPARIAN SETBACK REDUCTIONS [Refer to Code Section 18.797.1001 The DIRECTOR MAY APPROVE A SITE-SPECIFIC REDUCTION OF THE TUALATIN RIVER OR ANY MAJOR STREAM RIPARIAN SETBACK BY AS MUCH AS 50% to allow the placement of structures or impervious surfaces otherwise prohibited by this chapter, provided that equal or better protection for identified major stream resources is ensured through streambank restoration and/or enhancement of riparian vegetation in preserved portions of the riparian setback area. Eligibility for Riparian Setback in Disturbed Areas. TO BE ELIGIBLE FOR A RIPARIAN SETBACK REDUCTION, the applicant must demonstrate that the riparian corridor was substantially disturbed at the time this regulation was adopted. This determination must be based on the Vegetation Study required by Section 18.797.100 that demonstrates all of the following: Native plant species currently cover less than 80% of the on-site riparian corridor area; • The tree canopy currently covers less than 50% of the on-site riparian corridor and healthy trees have not been removed from the on-site riparian setback area for the last five years; That vegetation was not removed contrary to the provisions of Section 18.797.100 regulating removal of native plant species; • That there will be no infringement into the 100-year floodplain; and • The average slope of the riparian area is not greater than 20%. ADDITIONAL LOT DIMENSIONAL REQUIREMENTS [Refer to Code Section 18.810.0601 MINIMUM LOT FRONTAGE: 25 feet unless lot is created through the minor land partition process. Lots created as part of a partition must have a minimum of 15 feet of frontage or have a minimum 15-foot wide access easement. The DEPTH OF ALL LOTS SHALL NOT EXCEED 21/2 TIMES THE AVERAGE WIDTH, unless the parcel is less than 11/2 times the minimum lot size of the applicable zoning district. CODE CHAPTERS 18.330(Conditional Use) 18.620(Tigard Triangle Design -18.765 (off-Street Parking/Loading Standards) Requirements) 18.340(Director's Interpretation) 18.630(Washington Square Regional 18.775(Sensitive Lands Review) Center) 18.350(Planned Development) ',(. 18.705(Across/Egress/Circulation) 18.780(Signs) 18.360(Site Development Review) 18.710(Accessory Residential Units) 18.785(Temporary Use Permits) 18.370(Variances/Adjustments) 18.715(Density Computations) ` 18.790(Tree Removal) 18.380(Zoning Map/Text Amendments) 18.720(Design Compatibility Standards) ' 18.795(Visual Clearance Areas) 18.385(Miscellaneous Permits) 18.725(Environmental Performance 18.797 (Water Resources (WR) Overlay ,� Standards) District) V� 18.390(Decision Making 18.730(Exceptions To Development 18.798(Wireless Communication Facilities) Procedures/Impact Study) Standards) 18.410(Lot Line Adjustments) 18.740(Historic Overlay) 18.810 (Street & Utility Improvement Standards) 18.420(Land Partitions) 18.742(Home Occupation Permits) 18.430(Subdivisions) 2 18.745(Landscaping&Screening Standards) 18.510(Residential Zoning Districts) 18.750 (Manufactured/Mobil Home Regulations) 18.520(Commerdal Zoning Districts) 18.755 (Mixed Solid Waste/Recycling Storage) 18.530(Industrial Zoning Districts) 18.760(Nonconforming Situations) CITY OF TIGARD Pre-Application Conference Notes Page 7 of 9 NON-Residential Application/Planning Division Section ADDITIONAL CONCERNS OR COMMENTS: • • ! ' ‘C =11A1u4--^e C'03//, oet, . (6)-t�c = 207/ % ce PROCEDURE Administrative Staff Review. Public hearing before the Land Use Hearings Officer. Public hearing before the Planning Commission. Public hearing before the Planning Commission with the Commission making a recommendation on the proposal to the City Council. An additional public hearing shall be held by the City Council. APPLICATION SUBMITTAL PROCESS All APPLICATIONS MUST BE ACCEPTED BY A PLANNING DIVISION STAFF MEMBER of the Community Development Department at Tigard City Hall offices. PLEASE NOTE: Applications submitted by mail or dropped off at the counter without Planning Division acceptance may be returned. The Planning counter closes at 4:00 PM. Maps submitted with an application shall be folded IN ADVANCE to 8.5 by 11 inches. One (1), 81/' x 11" map of a proposed project should be submitted for attachment to the staff report or administrative decision. Application with unfolded maps shall not be accepted. The Planning Division and Engineering Department will perform a preliminary review of the application and will determine whether an application is complete within 30 days of the counter submittal. Staff will notify the applicant if additional information or additional copies of the submitted materials are required. CITY OF TIGARD Pre-Application Conference Notes Page 8 of 9 NON-Residential Application/Planning Division Section The administrative decision or public hearing will typically occur approximately 45 to 60 days after an application is accepted as being complete by the Planning Division. Applications involving difficult or protracted issues or requiring review by other jurisdictions may take additional time to review. Written recommendations from the Planning staff are issued seven (7) days prior to the public hearing. A 10-day public appeal p riod,follows all Ian a decisions. An appeal on this matter would be heard by the Tigard E'a. :« Qc .� . A basic flow chart which illustrates the review process is avail e from the lanning Division upon request. Land use applications requiring a public hearing must have notice posted on-site by the applicant no less than 10 days prior to the public hearing. This PRE-APPLICATION CONFERENCE AND THE NOTES OF THE CONFERENCE ARE INTENDED TO INFORM the prospective applicant of the primary Community Development Code requirements applicable to the potential development of a particular site and to allow the City staff and prospective applicant to discuss the opportunities and constraints affecting development of the site. BUILDING PERMITS PLANS FOR BUILDING AND OTHER RELATED PERMITS WILL NOT BE ACCEPTED FOR REVIEW UNTIL A LAND USE APPROVAL HAS BEEN ISSUED. Final inspection approvals by the Building Division will not be granted until there is compliance with all conditions of development approval. These pre-application notes do not include comments from the Building Division. For proposed buildings or modifications to existing buildings, it is recommended to contact a Building Division Plans Examiner to determine if there are building code issues that would prevent the structure from being constructed, as proposed. Additionally, with regard to Subdivisions and Minor Land Partitions where any structure to be demolished has system development charge (SDC) credits and the underlying parcel for that structure will be eliminated when the new plat is recorded, the City's policy is to apply those system development credits to the first building permit issued in the development (UNLESS OTHERWISE DIRECTED BY THE DEVELOPER AT THE TIME IN WHICH THE DEMOLITION PERMIT IS OBTAINED). PLEASE NOTE: The conference and notes cannot cover all Code requirements and aspects related to site planning that should apply to the development of your site plan. Failure of the staff to provide information required by the Code shall not constitute a waiver of the applicable standards or requirements. It is recommended that a prospective applicant either obtain and read the Community Development Code or ask any questions of City staff relative to Code requirements prior to submitting an application. AN ADDITIONAL PRE-APPLICATION FEE AND CONFERENCE WILL BE REQUIRED IF AN APPLICATION PERTAINING TO THIS PRE-APPLICATION CONFERENCE IS SUBMITTED AFTER A PERIOD OF MORE THAN SIX (6) MONTHS FOLLOWING THIS CONFERENCE (unless deemed as unnecessary by the Planning Division). PREPARED BY: pl1„,- - �c - or - CITY OF MAR PLANNIN DtVIS i - .41' • -e -OLDING PRE-APP. MEETING PHONE: (503)639-4171 FAX: (503) 684-7297 E-MAIL:(staffs first namel @ci.tigard.or.us TITLE 18 (CITY OF TIGARD'S COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT CODE) INTERNET ADDRESS: ci.tigard.or.us H:Ipattylmasters\Pre-App Notes Commercial.doc Updated: 18-Jan-2001 (Engineering section:preapp.eng) CITY OF TIGARD Pre-Application Conference Notes Page 9 of 9 NON-Residential Application/Planning Division Section • CITY OF TIGARD LAND USE APPLICATION CHECKLIST Please read this form carefully in conjunction with the notes provided to you at the pre- application conference. This checklist identifies what is required for submittal of a complete land use application. Once an application is deemed complete by Community Development staff, a decision may be issued within 6-8 weeks. If you have additional questions after reviewing all of the information provided to you, please contact the staff person named.below at the City of Tigard Planning Division, (503) 639-4171. 1 Staff: /./701, . --� Date: 0 572--3/co / --f 1. BASIC INFORMATION ALL LAND USE APPLICATIONS REQUIRE THE FOLLOWING: Completed Application Form with property owner's signature or name of agent and letter of authorization Title transfer instrument or grant deed Written summary of proposal Narrative demonstrating compliance with all applicable development standards and approval criteria (as specified in the Pre-Application Conference notes) Two (2) sets of stamped, addressed #10 envelopes for all owners of property within 500 feet of the subject property. Mailing envelopes shall be standard legal-size (#10), addressed with 1" x 4" labels (see envelope submittal requirements). Property owner mailing lists must be prepared by the City for a minimal fee (see request for 500' property owner mailing list form). Documentary evidence of neighborhood meeting (if required) Impact Study per Section 18.390.040.B.2.(e) Copy of the Pre-Application Conference notes Filing Fee 2. PLANS REQUIRED In addition to the above basic information, each type of land use application will require one or more of the following maps or plans. PLEASE SUBMIT EACH OF THE PLANS CHECKED BELOW WITH YOUR APPLICATION (Section 5 of this checklist provides details on what information to include on each plan): Vicinity Map ❑ Preliminary Grading/Erosion Control Plan Existing Conditions Map --ER Preliminary Utilities Plan ❑ Subdivision Preliminary Plat Map Preliminary Storm Drainage Plan ❑ Preliminary Partition/Lot Line Adjustment Plan Tree Preservation/Mitigation Plan `'f Site Development Plan ❑ Architectural Drawings Landscape Plan ❑ Sign Drawings Public Improvements/Streets Plan 3. NUMBER OF COPIES REQUIRED The City requires multiple copies of submittal materials. The number of copies required depends on the type of review process. FOR AN APPLICATION SUCH AS YOU ARE PROPOSING THE CITY REQUIRES f COPIES OF ALL APPLICATION MATERIALS. City of Tigard Land Use Application Checklist Page 1 of 5 4. SPECIAL STUDIES AND REPORTS Because of the nature of your project and/or the site you propose to develop, THE FOLLOWING ADDITIONAL STUDIES WILL BE REQUIRED. These studies must be prepared by certified professionals with experience in the appropriate field: ❑ Traffic Study ❑ Local Streets Traffic Study ❑ Wetlands/Stream Corridor Delineation and Report ❑ Habitat Area Evaluation ❑ Storm Drainage System Downstream Analysis ❑ Preliminary Sizing Calculations for Proposed Water Quality and/or Detention Facility ❑ Geotechnical Report ❑ Other 5. PREPARING PLANS AND MAPS Plans and maps should be prepared at an engineering scale (1" = 10/20/50/100/200') and include a north arrow, legend and date. The same scale should be used for all your plans. Where possible the City prefers the use of a scale that allows a site plan or subdivision plat to be shown on a single sheet. Architectural drawings may be prepared at an architectural scale. One copy of each plan must be submitted in photo-ready 81/2 x 11 format. THE FOLLOWING IS A LIST OF REQUIRED INFORMATION FOR EACH TYPE OF PLAN (If the plans you submit do not include all of the information requested because you feel it is not applicable, please indicate this and provide a brief explanation). Vicinity Map • Showing the location of the site in relation to: • Adjacent properties ❑ • Surrounding street system including nearby intersections ❑ • Pedestrian ways and bikeways ❑ • Transit stops ❑ • Utility access ❑ Existing Conditions Map Parcel boundaries, dimensions and gross area ❑ Contour lines (2' intervals for 0-10% slopes or 5'for slopes >10%) ❑ Drainage patterns and courses on the site and on adjacent lands ❑ Potential natural hazard areas including: • Floodplain areas ❑ • Areas having a high seasonal water table within 24"of the surface for three or more weeks of the year ❑ • Slopes in excess of 25% ❑ • Unstable ground ❑ • Areas with severe soil erosion potential ❑ • Areas having severely weak foundation soils ❑ • Locations of resource areas including: • Wildlife habitat areas identified in the Comprehensive Plan ❑ • Wetlands ❑ • Other site features: • Rock outcroppings ❑ • Trees with >_ 6"caliper measured 4'from ground level ❑ Location and type of noise sources ❑ Locations of existing structures and their uses ❑ • Locations of existing utilities and easements ❑ City of Tigard Land Use Application Checklist Page 2 of 5 Locations of existing dedicated right-of-ways ❑ Subdivision Preliminary Plat Map The proposed name of the subdivision ❑ Vicinity map showing property's relationship to arterial and collector streets U Names, addresses and telephone numbers of the owner, developer, engineer surveyor and designer(as applicable) n Scale, north arrow and date ❑ Boundary lines of tract to be subdivided Names of adjacent subdivisions or names of recorded owners of adjoining parcels of un-subdivided land ❑ Contour lines related to a City-established benchmark at 2' intervals for 0-10% grades and 5' intervals for grades greater than 10% ❑ The purpose, location, type and size of all of the following (within and adjacent to the proposed subdivision): • Public and private right-of-ways and easements ❑ • Public and private sanitary and storm sewer lines ❑ • Domestic water mains including fire hydrants • Major power telephone transmission lines (50,000 volts or greater) L J • Watercourses ❑ • Deed reservations for parks, open spaces, pathways and other land encumbrances ❑ • The location of all trees with a diameter 6 inches or greater measured at 4 feet above ground level ❑ • The location of all structures and the present uses of the structures, and a statement of which structures are to remain after platting ❑ Supplemental information including: • Proposed deed restrictions (if any) ❑ • A proposed plan for provision of subdivision improvements ❑ Existing natural features including rock outcroppings, wetlands and marsh areas The proposed lot configurations, lot sizes and dimensions, and lot numbers. Where lots are to be used for purposes other than residential, it shall be indicated upon such lots ❑ If any of the foregoing information cannot practicably be shown on the preliminary plat, it shall be incorporated into a narrative and submitted with the application materials ❑ Preliminary Partition/Lot Line Adjustment Plan The owner of the subject parcel The owner's authorized agent n The map scale, north arrow and date ❑ Proposed property lines n Description of parcel location and boundaries ❑ Contour lines (2' intervals for slopes 0-10% or 5' for slopes >10%) ❑ Location, width and names of streets, easements and other public ways within and adjacent to the parcel ❑ Location of all permanent buildings on and within 25' of all property lines LJ Location and width of all water courses ❑ Location of any trees with 6" or greater caliper at 4'above ground level ❑ All slopes greater than 25% ❑ Location of existing and proposed utilities and utility easements ❑ Any applicable deed restrictions ❑ Evidence that land partition will not preclude efficient future land division where applicable ❑ Future street extension plan showing existing and potential street connections ❑ City of Tigard Land Use Application Checklist Page 3 of 5 Site Development Plan The proposed site and surrounding properties ❑ Contour line intervals ❑ The locations, dimensions and proposed names of the following: • Existing and platted streets and other public ways ❑ • Easements on the site and on adjoining properties ❑ • Proposed streets or other public ways and easements on the site ❑ • Alternative routes of dead-end or proposed streets that require future extensions The locations and dimensions of the following: • Entrances and exits on the site ❑ • Parking and circulation areas ❑ ♦ Loading and service areas ❑ ♦ Pedestrian and bicycle circulation ❑ • Outdoor common areas ❑ • Above ground utilities ❑ • Trash and recyclable material areas ❑ The locations, dimensions and setback distances of the following: ♦ Existing permanent structures, improvements, utilities and easements which are located on the site and on adjacent property within 25' of the site ❑ • Proposed structures, improvements, utilities and easements on the site ❑ • Sanitary sewer facilities ❑ • Existing or proposed sewer reimbursement agreements n • Storm drainage facilities and analysis of downstream conditions ❑ Locations and type(s) of outdoor lighting considering crime prevention techniques ❑ The locations of the following: • All areas to be landscaped ❑ ♦ Mailboxes ❑ ♦ Structures and their orientation ❑ Landscape Plan Location of trees to be removed ❑ • Location, size and species of existing plant materials ❑ General location, size and species of proposed plan materials ❑ Landscape narrative that addresses: • Soil conditions and how plant selections were derived for them ❑ • Plans for soil treatment such as stockpiling the top soil ❑ ♦ Erosion control measures that will be used ❑ Location and description of the irrigation system where applicable ❑ Location and size of fences, buffer areas and screening ❑ Location of terraces, decks, shelters, play areas, and common open spaces ❑ Public Improvements/Streets Plan • Proposed right-of-way locations and widths ❑ A scaled cross-section of all proposed streets plus any reserve strips ❑ • Approximate centerline profiles showing the finished grade of all streets including street extensions for a reasonable distance beyond the limits of the proposed subdivision ❑ City of Tigard Land Use Application Checklist Page 4 of 5 Grading/Erosion Control Plan The locations and extent to which grading will take place ❑ • = Existing and proposed contour lines ❑ Slope ratios ❑ Utilities Plan Approximate plan and profiles of proposed sanitary and storm sewers with grades and pipe sizes indicated on the plans LJ Plan of the proposed water distribution system, showing pipe sizes and the locations of valves and fire hydrants U Preliminary Storm Drainage Plan The location of all areas subject to inundation or storm water overflow ❑ Location, width and direction of flow of all water courses and drainageways n Location and estimated size of proposed storm drainage lines ❑ Where applicable, location and estimated size and dimensions of proposed water quality/detention facility ❑ Tree Preservation/Mitigation Plan Identification of the location, size and species of all existing trees ❑ Program to save existing trees or mitigate tree removal (Section 18.790.030) ❑ A protection program defining standards and methods to be used during and after construction ❑ Architectural Drawings Floor plans indicating the square footage of all structures and their proposed use ❑ Elevation drawings for each elevation of the structure U Sign Drawings Specify proposed location, size and height LJ is\;curpin\masters\revised\checklist.doc 5-Jun-00 City of Tigard Land Use Application Checklist Page 5 of 5 414 PRE-APPLICATION „41. CONFERENCE REQUEST CITY OF TIGARD 13125 SW Hall Blvd., Tigard, OR 97223(503) 639-4171 FAX: (503) 684-7297 GENERAL INFORMATION , r. FOR STAFF USE ONLY Applicant: kilitnol Address: -'.G. 1;50A 2 31&j- Phone: 5o3-(220-209(o Case No.: Pe. Z z ] - 0 Od (o City: -Lb,)•12b cAz. Zip: 97 2451 Receipt No.: 2.-GU /" 3 377 Application Accepted By: ,, I-P Contact Person: J1 wt ,An Phone: 5o3-4,w-Zob�! Date: 8� ��/'o i Property Owner/Deed Holder(s): jllvv1 (4.4A, p DATE OF PRE-APP.: J/t-_3�b TIME OF PRE-APP.: c. u. Address: I '511 S,I,J . "]4'- Phone: 503-314-804 • PRE-APP. HELD WITH: City: 1j 6,f„A2 h Zip: 41 2'2.4 Rev.12/6/2000 i:\curpinlmasterslrevised\Pre-App Request.doc Property Address/Location(s): 1 S-11 5 •W . 14 Ave_ Ti 6.1h12.-p 0t2, REQUIRED SUBMITTAL ELEMENTS (Note: applications will not be accepted without the required submittal elements) Tax Map & Tax Lot#(s): 25 1 12 b L / 15 0 0 Pre-Application Conf. Request Form 2 COPIES EACH OF THE FOLLOWING: Site Size: Y. Brief Description of the Proposal and PRE-APPLICATION any site-specific questions/issues that RE-APPLICATION CONFERENCE INFORMATION you would like to have staff research prior to the meeting. All of the information identified on this form are required to be submitted by the applicant and received by the Planning Division a Site Plan. The site plan must show the minimum of one (1) week prior to officially scheduling a proposed lots and/or building layouts pre-application conference date/time to allow staff ample time to drawn the subject jest Also, show the location to for the meetin of the subject property in relation to the prepare g. nearest streets; and the locations of driveways on the subject property and A pre-application conference can usually be scheduled within 1-2 across the street. weeks of the Planning Division's receipt of the request for either Tuesday or Thursday mornings. Pre-application conferences are The Proposed Uses. one (1) hour long and are typically held between the hours of Topographic Information. Include 9:00-11:00 AM. Contour Lines if Possible. ❑ If the Pre-Application Conference is for a PRE-APPLICATION CONFERENCES MUST BE SCHEDULED IN MONOPOLE project, the applicant must PERSON AT THE COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT COUNTER FROM attach a copy of the letter and proof in 8:00-4:00/MONDAY-FRIDAY. the form of an affidavit of mailing, that the collocation protocol was completed IF MORE THAN 4 PEOPLE ARE EXPECTED TO ATTEND THE (see Section 18.798.080 of the Tigard PRE-APPLICATION CONFERENCE IN YOUR GROUP, PLEASE Community Development Code). INFORM THE CITY IN ADVANCE SO THAT ALTERNATE ROOM d Filing Fee $240.00 ARRANGEMENTS CAN BE MADE TO ACCOMMODATE THE _ GROUP. l'I'pt t+ I `t I�►8 7r/5:f ‘ L7T4 i ej7, 7 ' ' 1 Vi C‘.e . 64 1 \ 01:1 ,Afirel" U , tipo. 7 / x 151 .5 1 we 1 V•Vi f i i ' _f::$ ilt \l • X + 1 , f (1) • r49. x I /4 /�r ;�. � / �.�•.� '� \11 :50. 3 II 1 26. to ? / , 0 ,,, .1 148. 7 r Ili \xl x 5 8.9 1 y ., lli , ':,' (f i i‘ C.%);) 4 1 4, . I 1 I M 1� it x 148.5 j a• ' , c � ; i et. 43 i AI c,), c. ) op, 1 v.( ....%.„..."-;-` 1 1 1 fz)1 . k k i ii .N....jer- .1 ■b.e % , 0: . 1 ( , r ` t ii' v X 167. ' r ' I ‘,..• P ( p/Q),el 1;/ Ir5.2 x k / '` 5 '6\ uEtLAr e11FER o G G c,,-a iii1FIC1 c acoo M 75'LLETLa4D —— —— —L _ , �i III j e9.51.48"E-- -- -- 53400- —— ■— —— •' I I I ! uui �� Co 0 PO III 1111 • i 1 I /��N.�� N OI I 1 \ ���\\ III III' i I 1 1 anwrma E .: r coo m I `\\� till BUILDING 'A' ■ I I I I 111110111:211`A °' '•, \\` 111 II II 15615 Bill.14th . , I I I g M 1 ►_Jr�i o +. et O 00 1 1 11 1 11 I I c N c .�� j5 ' I1I 1 \ aoPAau�, -- --T— iiiiiiiiiii_, •1.�•■ ■�: i I I 7mir/7 L V N a��i I \,,•\,...\\ \ I I 1 i./H�i - ���\ \\11 C G G . I � 111'1+1 I �!u x O __ IIIIII'• 1 I ,�,U N O . .. 1 ` _\\III 1111 \ f I 1 I I i� N m O TAX MAP NO.: 2S112DC I I 1 1 irii Z I I I O ' lo�a� o rn a I- a t° TAX LOT = 1500 III III II I oh■ I 1 I-,-I 111 Illy L—I I a j I I I N I /�,'/;;%%/ 00 BUILDING 'B' t m: ! I•.//I/e 0 15655 51L.14th ; c�n/� 1 i� j • �j(L////// IVl I ���,��, V : I I I rr-� 1 k'/ or ART eTaNO PLAIN LINE / 1 EXIBMG SMILE ��• %%//N 1•AP1ILY RE61Dl4:2 .di 1 I l 1 I I/,f ,1 ■ I i 0// Al%;/ !' ' ,t ,. I 1 x I I C) I '/ .�� i 1/i/lr / 15,5 5111 ;-i 1 Qj // ,4th -ocrrw 'C', I I� I ry /' 1 BUILDING C ■ Z ///' i I, i ! I 0 C� u1 1 m nT Ie1fl BLL,4th j/ 1 1 1 1 �5I.FFER ZONE j 1 j I - W Z to I j j l j // // r /A•1 % 1 j 1 : ',1 0 UJ I PROJECT AREA 1! /// I /It `� HohY 1 I up I I I i Q x Cn Q / I 1111 j U W WIo � / % 1 1 1 1 1 eme w I I I Q� Q W eLMWE ''' 4144 1 / I I II.I \I ACTIN, J op i 1 I I I w LL O M •// / / / •I \ */f�,1$Ex18TMG' ( —o*n'n I —— — I——— / I I 1 O\ ,,,,,,,„„, ,. / I 11 \ ,. CAA. ; ATT I h I — 1 I g WI ;-' / I E 1 PLA I 11 11. \\\ \ '4 I BUILDING 'D' ' I I I U j V Q �I / I r 1 I 0 IW7�1t I 15151 9W,4th Be 1 I I 1 /I 1 I r I � I : t—I -- -- L-- -- -- -- I I I I 81 I I I 1 I S 89'51'48'W 341.11 , "'71 /. I 1 I II , I I i i•ZI /`/ I i I > I w I ' NORTH i I i `r. SITE PLAN . N I I I I 25'LLETLAND cV r'/ I I I \ 111 RIPPER 111=tip 0' W M� ` ' I I •� II LLET1_4 DB ' �y Y/'� Z I I I I LCOIlIDARY Q 1.L O I I I �; PROJECT DESCRIPTION PROJECT DATA V�) LQL o F 80N1TA I I i 1 THE APPLICANT PROPOSING TO CONVERT THE TAX MAP NO. 25 I I2DC 0 fL Lc-3 rz I I I 1 EXISTING RESIDENTIAL SHOP / GARAGE INTO TAX LOT NO. 1500 Z .< lo II i I^\1 A COMMERCIAL USE WHICH WOULD COMPLEMENT I I t THE EXISTING DEVELOPMENT. WE WOULD LIKE PREVIOUS SITE DEVELOPMENT s, DURHAM ROAD m LL ,p II 1 1 I REVIEW NO. : 91-00002 1 I I I TO SPECIFICALLY ADDRESS THE FOLLOWING ' r 'DURHAM ,� I I I 3 ISSUES: INFORMATION PROVIDED FOR THIS DATE: 8-14-01 NIGH I 604001 de DOCUMENT WAS OBTAINED FROM sa+ooL TREATMENT T I s I I I i� 1. SITE DEVELOPMENT PROCESS REQUIRED (TYPE 2 ?) DRN BY: DJL PLANT g < I i I 2. STORM WATER DETENTION / QUALITY FACILITY DOCUMENTS PREPARED PRIOR TO CHK'D BY: JDA le WAS CONSTRUCTED DURING THE PREVIOUS SITE THE CONSTRUCTION OF THE PROJECT. JOB 00-0502 VICINITY/MAP I I I DEVELOPMENT. WILL ADDITIONAL MODIFICATIONS NICOLI ENGINEERING HAS NOT VERIFIED #: 1 1 I I AND/OR APPROVALS BE REQUIRED? THE INFORMATION NOTED ABOVE W/ THE DWG #: WETLAND.DWG 1 1 1 i FIELD (AS-BUILT) CONDITIONS. 1 1 h 8 89'51'16"W I 2016 ( J 6' 1 4 u 1 1 1 OF: I - 3 E ■_ pc: N2 V4i A ^ r .rte �' ///� . -J. �J �- ®, USY! PIt \ ]tj ®\ R� O : . 1_I-1 J J J J J—.J -1 Imo ►:i. ■x tt)) (� ,)� iii y Tirs PROJECT INFORMATION TABLE OF CONTENTS OWNER - APPLICANT: CONTRACTOR: ENGINEER 00 GENERAL INFORMATION JIM CASTILE (OUNER/APPLICANT) NICOLI ENGINEERING,INC. 0.1 COVER SHEET 15715 SW 74th AvE. 9025 5.11.0 CENTER ST. ID SITE INFORMATION - EXISTING CONDITIONS TIGARD,OREGON 97224 TIGARD,OREGON 97223 1.1 SITE PLAN (503)620-2086 § 12 FACILITIES PLAN CONTACT:JAMES 0.ANDREWS I3 GRADING PLAN *6 SITE INFORMATION 1.4 ENLARGED PLAN a 2.0 SITE AND BUILDING PLANS - PROPOSED ADDRESS: 15715 5W 74th AvE PROPOSED USE:—LEASED COMMERCIAL SPACE 2.1 SITE PLAN ]L 6U1LDfNG 0 /TOILET ROOM ADDITION 22 LANDSCAPE/GRADING PLAN Q C CURRENT ZONING:—I-P 23 FACILITIES PLAN Q CURRENT USE: GARdrrE/SHOP LEGAL DESCRIPTION:—TAX MAP: 25112DC 30 ELEVATIONS Q 47 EQ TAX LOT: 1500 z 3.1 GARAGE-EXISTING AND PROPOSED SITE INFORMATION 32 BUILDING "D"ELEVATIONS Q wQrr W/PROPOSED TOILET ROOM V Z ZO� BONITA PROJECT DESCRIPTION Q Q I- 91 THE APPLICANT IS PROPOSING MODIFY AND CONVERT SfTE AN EXISTING SHOP/GARAGE STRUCTURE INTO ^of m A LEASEABLE SPACE /SPACES. AS PART OF THIS -I APPLICATION A NEW TOILET FACILITY ADDITION IS BEING Q ��r PROPOSED TO THE WEST SIDE OF THE EXISTING BUILDING "D". RErtgaS AS.W.DURHAM ROAD `n Dale: 2-22-02 TIGARD 2 DURHAM scaler HIGH SCHOOL ��- pJ Dawn by DJE SCHOOL U) by LA to USA. O�e� SITE DEVELOPMENT REVIEW Drawing No.: P-DCONFR TREATMENT PLANT SUBMITTAL DOCUMENTS SHEET NO. 0.1 wwirr� \ �ane I ■■ I III P 10 — — I wse•srwz esroa•i- >. .•^ . _ .c::,� .∎ I I I =r■ 3 MEM \ \ tt�t.,�.;. BUILDING'A' +�;':'c+C:: IANC�SCAF'EINGI ♦' .!;.� \ \ ,.�Yr:'>..: 15815 PI AL I rI C'■ :`»;' .en..n. (6,400 SF.) I ■_ �:: `=;_: I I I II ~V ~ VEHICULAR R I iii 1 11-4 I I I y '� I ACCESS I/EGRESS ■e 1,11 ii, 1 1 ;, I i 1 I---I—= =a I I I2 CARETAKERS RESIDENCE / /.F ` BUILDING'B' - p (1�6�65 SFJ / ���r` I u (5,160 8FJ i f ".tii: i j i 1'/ ± u:;ry„� J.+; 777777 T i s I• 1 I j �i%/ [p.e.�•t,! ..O e,..---AC.J Ye I-.2 j C] . I.' / t '� / BUILDING c I a I a I ; � I SI 15717 x + ;c / i �,-,. 4M 'r' ;r p (5,160 SF) :,5 I j I I V �V I ` .7-' ' 111. 7717.17■■ b °'�� : .� .� -I-I rn-rl- -I-I-rl-1-I d j a 5 s F 4' 225'1” ' .ti=:�=° - 251'3 -. y : I VEHICULAR I IGUL I R I• sc / t / .. ACCESS I/EG SS Q CC z /' I �42'�jj�j/j/�j m...��. II' ° cc— �y •`iK,.Y�� I I I , ali• :..,, s:�: I BUILDING'D' ?ti" I I I I II / I"�';sue yM n a (6 �0 SFJ - .'T I 1 g / Ir1 .s :-:•i..' .....r a ;t I r I I / I 4:1' - -- s narw'W • '" ..ynr ...�.1.. • .. I I :I / PROJECT BOlA1DA \I PROPOSED TOILET ROOM(19 SF.)I I I I Z 00 H / SEE ENLARGED PLANS Q II I 7/V 111FILANO / �"� EXISTING SHOP/GARAP•E G STRUCTURE TO 23E UPGRADED \ AS REQUIRED FOR A CHANGE \ OF USE/OCCUPANCY.(1,509 SF.) ROOM I \ SITE AREA 555 AL. (100%) A • BUILDNG AREA:—32240 SF. (13%) PROJECT DATA �- .n.o. PAVEMENT: 533295 SF. (22x) TAX MAP NO. 26 I I2DC A• \w LANDSCAPING:-156,125 SF. (65x) TAX LOT NO. 1500 Doke 2-22-02 a NORTH swe 1'-60 Drown by la �$ EXTG. CONDITIONS SITE PLAN e by LA I. 1"•60' Drawing No.: MST-S,TE SHEET NO. ■.■'■YM'III MOP - 1.1 ,. 6[9[199 rd m, KZL6 sm�ao 99ot�ts ros Fwd 3W tit'Al•S SILSI n n b CZZ(6 mtst)Pk-1S AIM 1S 206 smart' Io � $ c.•1 n 1:Ca\1u::•:=M \M•l O j r 4 8 a 11001 ` ONuSy�>y 3118Y0 re, JtVaS(aN my 11117L a B Z N i UAW 8 1=s f — —_ OREGON-ELECTRIC RAILROAD— —_ e ----------------- -- __-----_--S_W.- 74TH AVE. _—_---_ - • ••• � i 1 ( `== II _ Bp I Z BO Q 0 m Rh p J 2 r 1 ii 29° al k 1 1 ji.1 i me mmeM U I Ie w r D.JNICniflm I \\\\\j 0_,• LL !, p-:t1 .1 , \\t 1 , \ 1D J l \ f^ 1 1, ik t I J / • m« m.KCa_aao / O'er / Eby i i . ' r ./ ... 3 • I I • – \ -axa KINKS(flX) 31/1 9e0Z-OZ9 MX) mom taL6 MOM'MI . . 3AY LW AS SUSI 8 rtus wow 13.01-is Alun AS SZIA SSAAIOY NOWOCIV MOH.131101 ON Ban . -0 S i ON::0:1::.”■:1:1111;C:Igi 1V10143111400 01.3411101111L8 g...11915 ONLLSIn AO N0ISESIAN03 1103 • b,\6,1 mwsvo rar NEIVc1 iviiiisnam .anv 41t7L • • • . . - cl s :DOW :133Vd «< I- I' _ S W 74TVE. . H A ________ _.__________ ______________ _ __ __ __ .x.zi, ,,4 ....y.,,,,,,,, • ,rt,,,, ,,,„....;,,,,,;....,,...,.._,„,...,,,„....6:1 ...1,., ; .,..,......,...,.,....„.,. .i.,. , ,,,,., ..„....,...,....s.,„,..., z .. ,..■ • r ;•:. 43EZ)z3=ED rJANYZI KAM AR?..-VIA..1,., ? IU ti 9.I 4 [: .6 — I 1 1 CL til I 03 !..) — I :C) i 6 2 i..thR3S. I i D.• V 1 w a — . I I CE \ \ fe '''''.Vi''' ' =I ■ ■ , . .... ...-- L 'Ilti II ,f1 rnyagmnat ' e 0 i •‘..I \ /I IS e Z 0;1 • ii i— •.., . a oNicrnne . ,.... ._... \ ,...*Ve . . ..:'..;,;.1.7.-: , \ ULH.. I F I'..',:i!':4:;.:11,;1,',",;•::.;<-?''▪ ' •':4.14. .?.; \ ! \1 I S 2-.A.;;,•';;;;.,,,if$.0_Ez.--.s_-,--.,._ .'.',1,1?. 7.,:,.■,. ):t•;-:`:.I -•:•..-..i• '`,1 .irz?...:rift:t. 11 11! --- .1 .-.....,...s.....„, "-.......'F'e....„P.;4.)..:-t.',.;.■ I ■ I . '0',... I . , *. A a'. -:: 1,0 :.,- ...t. •.?.''. ,tk:',',. ' -1--1" _.... ,..., ll ..," \ ;,._ _......._.._..:..\\I'..1. • .,...4,.. . .....::':. 2. . .1 ....‘‘..\‘‘."i.;.' . -1*-fti_ -\'''_....... _._:.-..--7c--n„ -- `" i , \ ,'. ...r' / /,.... •.1 z. 1-•........ V-,:-.... - -------- ,... I / / -,44.- ... ,,,. _ ___ ______ ,-- /....-, ,• 6-.., \-'------,_ _. • •• --....-----.... ------.e. --...__ ; , .• • / / •, / ., 4 .,. ...............___, s, , ----------------------------- -e. ,./ ---------------------------------- ,,, . ... . . . , ... _14 r!/1 I ',... ........ -.------------- / I / 1 --- -fia d 1 I s... '‘. ? 1 . • 1 t 1 ,..s •,. 1 1 .. a -3r.tec.aLaki-ri" _----c• / / r-------------- •■nn■ >11 ..■ 8 i O iii■ I 1 �' FLOOD PLAIN i i 0 gg BOUNDARY LINE / / l I =� . t mom nil / / EXISTING I ' :'�. /////< e; j REDENGE111111111.111 / ‘z, / I 1 / / � -7 I I l 1 / / LANDSCAPED AREA l y't HIGH SOLID WOOD FENCE _ % BLOCK WALL V k"-CONCRETE CURB § / / 3'HIGH TAPERS FROM STORAGE CONCRETE 3'-0"TO 8" U g SHED DIVIDERS 3 a N / /\ `fl A.C.PAVEMENT--7 I EDGE OF A.C. Q EXISTING PAVEMENT 1 CB.- 1 GOA{CRET=CURE g � o-�� J L ARA STORAGE WOG FENCE \ SOLID AREA n 1 EXTG.GARAGE/ i Z�O I N. I L. f } iga I I I i ni... , IT-0"4, 43'-0" T 1Y'-0", EXIST } C NS Tr I n �. 6T' 0" 4 ExTG. I I BLDG.'D' QUALITY TER I STORAGE SHED-----.... } lttlA9. I A. rn I� FACILITY 1 1 A . . DGE OF A.C. TORAGE A . LL r1 I \ / - - - - yVEENT yCONTA ME RS I 1 _ Date 2-22-02 Scale 1%40' Drove by. PL NORTH Checked by: ,0A I I SITE PLAN No.: 020104 Drawing No.: ERIC-91E EXISTING CONDITIONS 1"=20' SHEET NO. 1.4 / / --- -\ .ri .nF. 2 11; r-------------- .,. FLOOD PLAIN I I 1 O n°b I BOUNDARY LINE 'r0 pp / illa // I V 1 / Z ;:. / / I =• S• ......1 / MI/c. 'Z.,�, / T / I • EXTG.CARE 1 / TAKERS RESIDENCE I 1 I 0 1 1 / / I / a 3e 8 0 9 NEW ACCESSIBLE ROUTE 0 12 r TO CONNECT TO EXISTING g N g p 1 / TOCONNE a 3= 20'-0" 20'-0" A.G. �J 2 SPACES AT 20' 40' �PAVEMENT� Y :Cl/ 4"WIDE 0 I ACCESSIBLE \\ i PAINTED Z I ROUTE \\\/ ` STRIPES IL li \\ 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 I I" I I I I I I I I \\ (WHITE) Q I I I I i :p CATCH L J L J '= `18 WIDE PAINTS■ _ EXISTING _STRIPES(WHITE) '- ROUTE \ �9 BASIN OFFICE WAREHOUSE WAREHOUSE OFFICE _'Q- BICYCLE RACK 1 _ 0t� P A fit K I N G D A T A to 1 316 SF. / MANUF. / MANUF. 316 SF. Z 00 584 S.F. 564 SF. NEW A.G. r • THE FOLLOWING "USE" AREAS HAVE BEEN ' SIDEWALK ASSUMED IN ORDER TO ESTIMATE IN BEST }— `a — �1� FROM TOILET I Q JUDGMENT,THE NECESSARY PARKING 12'-0", � 43'-0" II2'-0" EXISTING EXISTING } SPACES REQUIRED ��CB. ROUTE. 1 bl'-0" 57'-4" EXTG. OFFICE 2 SPACES 9 -- , I BLDG.'D' 632 SF.ASSUMED EXTG.WATER I } eE tslDns 632 / 1,000 b3 x 2.10 = 1.1 '^ io I AGIL FACILITY I 1 A A.G. A . WAREHOUSE /MANUF. I SPACES PAVEMENT PROPOSED 1,168 SF. ASSUMED . , NEW RESTROOM / I 1,168 / 1,000 12 x 030 = 35 / — I Date: � — — — — — — — — '-2p•. TOTAL REQUIRED SPACES -3 —— —~ —•—•—�— —•— —•—•—•—•—•— Drowe Scale:by Dl 1 TOTAL SPACES PROVIDED 4 NORTH Checked by Di.JDA (EXTRA T SPACE OR LOST SPACE ENLARGED SITE PLAN No.: 020104• Al START OF t�W ROUTE) Job N No.: No: SITE I STANDARD PROPOSED MPROVEMENTS 1"=20' 2 PARALLEL SHEET NO. I DISABLED 2•1 __ ----. FLOOD PLAIN ----________ 1 r ■� nn. C'. -c2 !'�� 1111.. BOUNDARY LINE [ -v: �• �� `:.;"- } [ /�r� O :VII / / CARETAKERS ?• y ci ' 0o RESIDENCE 11.11■■■, p .J' EXISTI 1 11,11 p�N py nstv.nn S; CURB & VA 1E:/ €1 .� • Qtrt, / 7 .� Dom.. EXISTING FENCE 1 I LI i 9 ;' rEMG.LAUN njl L-J 1, �r� �r� L/ r� �•1 / / �� �� j�� i i EXISTING CURB n• • BICYCLE RAC.' • " _ __ _ _ % \ tit -- CMU BL / / /77 /7- / WALL TAPERS / STORAGE 8 �� 3'NIGH �� FROM 3' TO 8" �� U s / • SHED �8 �S CONCRETE / # / DIVIDERS 9 ' cc z . / A.C.PAVEMENT 144.19 Y [LC. i C. 'I/ ( e E CATCH = — IIIIIII IIIIIII IIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIII N\: Oil $ �CI� . . , , ,1111 '141.45 ) =_ TO L J L J 'e }= \ \ Cs OFFICE •REHOUSE/WAREHOUSE/OFFICE NEW BICYG_E 0I� 316 5F MANUF• MANUF• 316 P. RACK SEE I 5 554 SF. 984 SF. SHEET 32 I Z 00 I ,k } LLj f. ^ NEW A.G. > DOSING LANDSCAPE PLANTING SCCrF®ULE /, - 611 -JL- SIDEWALK 1 Q Q caTION 1441‘ wr. '� '^Otl • EXISTING CATCH / I I ``` $A5M �.O 9/' FENCE , EXTG. snww PROPOSED a • ^^a ,.ma rx .� EMC WATER C@ TOILET ROOM } BLDG 'D' AEM90N5 [ QUALITY [ V/ I A • . 0-r• O 1r"""`O""' w. 1111.ow 1 FACILITY J �A.C.PAVEMENT �� I A • d►A °D"' - I n�� / — — I39.5� _ 1 Dote 2-22-02 -.—11-11_,- _._11.11-•-.r-• -•_-�--• .�_•_--•-�--•- stag. 1._p' • NORTH Chet Eby. MA ++ EXISTING GRADES I LANDSCAPE / GRADING PLAN No.:N0.: °LANDSCAPE -=2p' SHEET No. 2.2 RI i Ng • Li __ O i I g 111111A1 T ir.• / . • / T • j•. •/ / I 1 / !ill I `�, 1 • U 5,N i a • `\�01���1 EXISTING 12"STORM DRAIN LINE `9 Y I I j I EXISTING 45 1 EXTG. I \\ .... CATCH BASIN Cr Z CATCH IIIiiiii II�II �iiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiii \ Q \ BASM V 5G� D ' �D •X"s.SS LINE 2 ? L J L J I — ZOO I IERLINE.tERAT I- w'V n O EXITTN Jr li IN LINE �EXTG S•LME XISTI 4"STO GATGI I } 17.--_-__ �\` BASIN I LA BLDG.'D' i 1 EXITING WATER I • } II OJALITY FACILITY I — I ZJ • ,` i 1 Q • ' - - .— _.-� - - - — — — 1 Dater 2-22-02 Seek 1..20. NORTH Dram by. IM. Checked by. .DA I FACILITIES PLAN "0.: 020104 • Drawing No.: SITE FAC.. PROPOSED MPROVEMENTS 1•=20' -SHEET NO. 2.3 • ._In 1M ETAL ROOF PANELS i 6i (RED) O na UR IIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIII_ OVERED STORAGE Z EXTERIOR HTS LIG 'l ti OPEN OPEN AT EA.MANDOOR I 'n o g TYP. I O O O THIS END OPEN ETAL WALL PANELS 0 (WHITE) ADDRESS a AS ® �11' DETERMINED BY NORTH ELEV. CITY OF TIGARD " EXISTING VW • r-0" (RED) ROOF PANELS !WILL THIS WALL NORTH ELEVATION EIALTROOF PANELS �CRED) DRY STORAGE PROPOSED I/8"• 1'-0" (RED) P. METAL ROOF PANELS METAL WALL PANELS s (RED) �I !WHITE) OPEN 9 9 9 9 m m ��� (UIHIITE)WALL PANELS ` ' 2 q 2 1 COVERED STORAGE `-METAL WALL PANELS 9 Y r Q z SOUTH ELEV. r. INF ILL THIS WALL ��, J EXISTING IN," • r-m" Q (RED) ROOF PANELS ELRCICE PANELS Z(v EAST ELEVATION WEST ELEVATION . ED m \ PROPOSED I/8" • I'-0" PROPOSED I/8• • I'-0" Q a Q~ TAL WALL PANELS (WHITE) EAST ELEVATION SURFACE LIGHT-TYP. EXISTING 1/16" • r-0" oHs o A • Id A . MI OPEN mi ® !11 III A. 2-22-02 . Oran by D.L Checked by. MA WEST ELEVATION \ ILL Drawing elev TIS WALL ETAL WALL PANELS Dr EXG VI6" • I'-m" SOUTH ELEVATION (WHITE)NO. PROPOSED I/8" • 1'-0" 3.1 mow"�� p ml ■ r rI .■ IMIll .1 Z111 71 ti - • 1 -1 -1 1 I 1 _ I _ E l - t-ALL EXTERIOR 4...,.. ❑ // �/ ❑ FINISHES TO _ MATCH EXISTING • BUILDING D t / ....„ TOILET ROOM 0 BUILDING "D" ELEVATION = -) of sF a � NORTH ELEVATION 1/a"=1'-0" sC ZZc FILL PIPE W/CONC. JC �—(91100TH TOP) J 0 Q LQQ]] ❑ g I d fsALV.PIPE Z 00� Y� � Cdr i 4'•GALV.PIPE Q PAINTED GREEN ( r l 3• 3' Kra. // I // p 7.--H CONCRETE 7 „. ;:. I 1 1 0 . f 1 I I ALL EXTERIOR I I I I FINISHES TO I L.J I Date: 2-22-0s z._, • 1 01 T MATCH EXISTING :I L__ I Scale: 2-22-'-0" ADDITION BUILDING D F Drown by DX BICYCLE RACK Job o. by: �A BUILDING �D„ ELEVATION Job Drawing 020104 • WEST ELEVATION 1/a 1'-0" SHEET NO. 3.2 ■EM § A ° a � ' � p © , r ov0 id!4V ! NNT r Ill r p r ° a p o 11 .1 . \ rl ---11 ��, Il c ,. il� ,� ▪ ::. s. Tr; ' _A INN� siirj14 (1 .----.-4. JL \ 4,-, azi j4,- ED) _LI ____.'.1 .1-.1._i - 40 Cg)M Tw.7-gli drerizt_,Co)wz ..■ AINTaVVEll■4_, , !6, a PROJECT INFORMATION o z -- kfl OF CONTENTS 2 �Q. ; OWNER - APPLICANT: CONTRACTOR: ENGINEER 0,0 GENERAL INFORMATION JIM CASTILE (OILNER / APPLICANT) NICOLI ENGINEERING, INC. 0.1 COVER SHEET 15715 SW 74th AVE. 9025 S.W. CENTER ST. 1.0 SITE INFORMATION - EXISTING CONDITIONS W TIGARD, OREGON 97224 TIGARD, OREGON 97223 N 1.1 SITE PLAN .< (503) 620-2086 12 FACILITIES PLAN cn CONTACT : JAMES D. ANDREWS 13 GRADING PLAN U , SITE INFORMATION 1.4 ENLARGED PLAN z o W5 ova 2.0 SITE AND BUILDING PLANS - PROPOSED ♦ - ADDRESS: 15715 SW 74th AVE PROPOSED USE:—LEASED COMMERCIAL SPACE 2.1 SITE PLAN BUILDING D / TOILET ROOM ADDITION 22 LANDSCAPE / GRADING PLAN CC, Z CURRENT ZONING:—1-P 23 FACILITIES PLAN O CURRENT USE: GARAGE / 610P LEGAL DESCRIPTION:—TAX MAP: 251120C 3.0 ELEVATIONS a a U TAX LOT: 1500 EE Z w 3.1 GARAGE-EXISTING AND PROPOSED H jmo SITE INFORMATION 32 BUILDING "D" ELEVATIONS Cl) W o W/ PROPOSED TOILET ROOM a w°17:cc Z 0 0 BONITA PROJECT DESCRIPTION ZrE° 9 THE APPLICANT IS PROPOSING MODIFY AND CONVERT t Q SITE AN EXISTING SHOP / GARAGE STRUCTURE INTO o - ZD m A LEASEABLE SPACE / SPACES. AS PART OF THIS NU /''� 4 APPLICATION A NEW TOILET FACILITY ADDITION IS BEING Q �� r PROPOSED TO THE WEST SIDE OF THE EXISTING BUILDING "D". REVISIONS: DECEIVE S.W. DURHAM ROAD `� RECEIVED n s �°a9 FEB 2 8 2002 A A . TIGARD DURHAM ��47- ��AN CITY O TIGARD Date: 2-22-02 2-22-02 HIGH SCHOOL �� ti� NGINEERING Drawn by. DI SCHOOL N °� Checked by. JDA TREATMENT °0 �° SITE DEVELOPMENT REVIEW Checked No.: P—COVER PLANT <<P� SUBMITTAL DOCUMENTS SHEET NO. 0.1 tN zue�Lnra ■ AF■ R IIETLAY LINE N 89'51'48 ' .!!J � • 534IDm' _ t I O Nom• ° b \. izoucop PLAN 7:::',••••,•',:' s< , °`` '`U BUILDING 'A' >� ■ I ANI SCALE INGI •'-;■ a• :,. .:.: 15615 •Y':: ;.`i 1YPIAL I ■- Ni`- • \ �;;'' :.: .. / (6,400 SF.) I 1 \ a":c i / i.e...) , � ` V VEHICULAR ?� u " Z 6 I _ n "' ACCESS / EGRESS !_�`€" ' !_+, : : D ell 0 I I S th iz I �; it l CARETAKERS RESIDENCE / I BUILDING 'B' 4 W 15715 H u 6 15655 t m I i I ��, I m o (I,2665 SF.) r :': ,;:`;. I (S, 60 SF.) ; -■ C/1 2 Q0��9• k/ :: r;x., ",}. 1 I 1 t-1 J 1 si b+: �I �?/ ``� ° �� BUILDING 'C' a 1 I z F•�I / .3; . :,::. � : .t _.— `, - - 15717 .■ I I I rg �o•/ N eu ,t toHe :�":, .,.. (5,16 0 ;. C) / '',' n' - -_. ..�. J , ,. F .'■ I 1 19 ' Li =� .^_'-. re ca 225'#• '':.' .mmo � � I 251'± -► : 9£9f-499(f xo j �j vi J1 N'8, V' 1 4£ZL6 N093a0 'aaysa �' ,N, 9602-OZ9 £OS :auoy41 4j6 1b i: o �I/ V. 3lld 4JtiL M S SILSI N o o fzzLS a� 'Pk - S�l . II' • "' f+� ss3aaav NOWdav WOO�i 191101 aNy 2sn `; `° o ■■■■.h.■■1��T■.11■Olko �� II 1VI3H2WWOO 019HfLLOfW..S N o .- o L- rc�i n.�;i i u r.1.i'n i.;� r. �� rONLLSIX2 dO NOISEIDWOO a o &41>? 11-L. 91 isvo par )11:1Vd 1!IO ■ ` ( f i :1N3f13 :133ra2Jd r <a\ o° �n o LI o c=n T ��d Q1 OREGON ELECTRIC RAILROAD _ _ _ --------------------- ------- — —_ S.W.S.W._ 74TH AVE. _ _ _ _ --I- - ........................................... ;...,..i■..r.■.■■.■, --- B m!'m5'6"E •On y -- -- i I Ze❑ � 80 8 Q a « � z i t,-;si 0 Z - o m ° 1 • Si� ° 0 CO CO � ; D 6 0 o 3 I^ W 9. m m is m I ri 0 16 s i ... U FF X z o t � WVa1d 441110 19.A q•ilGlx3 ■ - f— I? Q r 2 ( I W 1 1 1 r I pp I 569 91 CtE l I- I 9 .r m t ' N 1 !h ea • K ❑ J ,ss1fiL m 0es,6m_00 e \.. . .--`,.,. ...',,,.,, . / ....,....„_ . 1 il .\ • to \ J1 Mild -----.......\ .\1/4„...,......-06'LuRZLAND3 q g,131,1 4, ectiq • •=111 '-' gi 4.........LINE ■I• !..'. r"• '''' II 1 I I 1 I --.....,,, II !ILI 13,15"51.48"E_. . ._,_ 534001 ...1 :.• cr.' \ • r ..... - --- -... ■ .....,. /1 I rTi;.:;;;4•,:':' '''''-'. " '- . , .. ... •,... ... 1, .14.1,;.;::,.,:.:',,,:',•::.: ,, '7. 1 1 ...... -.., i t !If i;,...-1::::',•••;:•'s,--. El NI .:;''F:.':z.:..-,:::.:11 1 1.8 ll'7'1::!11.1111 1. .... r .:••,.....•.*.^.., MI . ..,:z.....,"^.P:: .;• ss, l/if :'•....:..c. ,,:. / BUILDING 'A' I . 1 ,.:,:.:,...s..,-.7.;.i.:,• • 1 ... \ .... -.- -4-, 1:11;•-•,.! 4 1 I i ,it/•'•••.I.•"••••..• 0 / 7..; .•!'.•.44::.......a.'• I i I I I ;1 te'.!':':•:%`,.:.: / / ., . , .. i.rs .., i„ .k ,. ,, ..,:.r..: , I, t,\ k 't.!.,''.,,‘.4,;......, //' I • I -'• it•1:3 • ./ \ \ N.-IX, • '',W. /./1■IMEN•I•//Ail=11 I I I I I V//////////,rir II,/,/////////Z.I=I I•I• \ __ I '•"*7. ' \\ \NkV+f .',.1.••,., / I g71 •• ... / \ .• \ .\\•I'W‘:•. .••' / 1 1 ---s,v• 141,1...,.. .. / / C VC C I's -!.,....,....•1••^,•: • IN 1 v _.-7.--;10, . . , \\ i„..,-,.....-,:z,... ,,,- ,.0 i , , I, •\,.:: .,.- , . , 1 1 \1 IIII -":-.' • , .1 . ...._ •1 / I •..`.'.,` a 6 • , I.Naakol.:-.....4'121■ • 1 I 1 ■ .■.-...■....m..--■....... .■ • -• -"''' ' '''----- .. . , 1 .. 1 I ' 0 i :1,1,-,•• ..474.4,....z, 6: •.,,2: , 1 r (4.„cd, .1111 ,.„. i a.... .1r,!*...7...sammmimmin■orzz..in- : • I 1 tt lb kr I "...'tc) 0.10 I /.,:/.1//'1,1.11111,111://111,111/,11/1111i 1,,11.:::....1.•••11:..";',.‘:-.:..- en--4 4°tIr:$0,140: .)4 .: • ,.4 w , 1 0 1 • 2 • co . co t 'P/' '/" :4,--•;,,, "j H 1 • I 0 1 / ///// // /:Z....",.". V/I BUILDING 'B' . ...,...../ .. ,/,,,,,,// ..-1...',..•:.- 1 0 6 -......11:. , , .,,# .-// •..,..::,.......- ..... '• I, 1 \ • N...11... • ,• '/// // ••-•':•.:!('`.*•'-'' 1 1.'.., .'....• I C/) • 4 ‘. 4 / , 0 /.. •...,..,:v -••„., ...: X. ..,•,...:-..i• .• 1 tt , i ,...,.,,:.:--4. ./ , "":-..,', •'::•■.‘• i Ial ..a...■.xi■-44.....■L■.. aa 4.•wal..a.m.a.= •.k"./. ii;'// 84660-6?11M1441i'..2, ....,.., // , • :,..'1 I ... 4./• 5/ / : ' .,..:-....7,Y .,..;.,,i,:V. A (P./ 5//i/ / :,v,....„,..--,:-.-•:=::::''Z':::::%:;:..i.::.L:*. I •...6 ..'..-. • I-,2 I 1 c•-•) - // / / / ".''.7.'....;.:.• 1-1' I I '--3 I 0/ 4///// • 1-3 1 , SO.\ / •'.-i:S ,.' • , I ,---4 i., ::...',....i-C;,:i 1 I ' of' ,04 ., .,:: :. kW ki. -!:,:;--;• ......," ./ ,04/1/ ..,, ' 111.0Mit -• - .,,i N .-:::....:. ::. :.7,.,`,...; i o>.•-s, 4 .• //1 r ." .;,..:-.,.....:: . :;:-.----..' """" H BUILDING 'C' ....:.,.•„... i '`"- / 1 I I 1 2155'1.w1.9....r*::.:1-.4-5,.*.'.-..:."....:..Y..','..•;.ri..,...:'....1'.::.c.*.:;7..':1..7....:••1 1. ".N/.C 6 IS, 1 4q 72. •:.'.';.'.......4•1• I I g• t t■•■1 1 4:t LCCIC-)J /11.11,//. . ,/.:=-•,Z.-•,-, ....:-?-.-:.'-0. :,'; •::::: i i :, 4, . '„."44••i.• / / , id ..-1/.S..'-.'•::'''....Z.,,:::,...e:..:.•.:••:!',L.,:., ■ J.,. ,...- - g• ,,, Lej "") L.7.•'3-(4 .• / /it . . .. ,• .. P ''.,:-.-•:•;.;.-• ro f i g ..,..n:-NB I 1 tz:j / / / / 1 / /In III •v ..---- ...„..,.,-:i!, / I I/ 1 W I ,..'"- ...." • I 1 I / / I , , lik 1 , ,,, • 1 , I Ne 1 I l \ \ ,7 1444_ .....44tZ • • i CC / • / / i k•\ \ ‘ • '''----/\'• i• t ‘ /.r .../L. • % • 1 < OZ ' Y I / / • / 1\\ ‘ ''.':','V r , ) .-...:..-„,.....-..+.:.:::. •‘ i , ,... ....._ c c g. . 1 Ir....,..:,:.:.:-...:...- . 0— ,E • , , . N u / 1 . 1 1 ':'..c.:.,•-.. — u -- — 4——— I —.,n..., j / t 1\ -.:::•••• immr/7/.4••••://///,./././/mriri. /./7/7/././../A■•••NUT!. , i LJ , i 1 l • ‘ -...:,.:...V. ./,': ... /51 ..4......- • 1 ol :,•Z:•-•,:',.;.'!".;.,•,'• 1 i 'A „,,..Q /• . / / f t 1 1 .1 ,...:-......:„..t.--.• Li I I .. i I 1 : ---V.- -4'' ''..:,•,\•-•: ;;;o: BUILDING 'D' ,....,,?....,...... I 1 ..., ., / 1 / '7 .;•:.::., 1 •.° W I I a)2 8 . . ' r 1 t .LI:' ).:' ... '''...':-..k.' „....."" /1,00 _ I .,.....:4!r.':.. .. 1 /. i I . 1 \ ' ' ..'• ..\- I I U) M AarliALT i I /.• / .- ....I . i D Id 0 CC 1 . I r t tf IT 1 I I 8 E/3'51148*w 341.11' '..i.;.:`'.. .,;.....i:';'..:•.:' 4.• Hi , 0 Li..017 I I Z . / I l a a 1 1 1 z 0 0 I 1 i H . 1 1 1 I 1 IN I 0 • 1 ,. W 0 W t 1 t t > E n 1 • 1 ...-. \• (--215'11.611-A ND <C \ 1,1 • BLFFER i 1 ' t i 1 \ ' IIETLAND6 BOUNDARY '-'-' 'ff. 0 F COLLI i I . ci L NB gc- N 0 CO D t 1 NORTH . I t 1 1 , , 1 1 ,.., 1 t \ REVISIONS: I I I ‘, r GRADING PLAN 1 A . 1 1 1 1 ! P1 1".6,0' I 1 1 rit ....) EXISTING CONDITIONS 7\ • 1 1 ,,,1 I C4 1 I I A . 1 1 1 it 1 1 1 1 1 1 I Date: 2-22-02 I I 0,0 I 1 1 9 Scale: 1"=60' I 0- 1 I I 1 EXISTING GRADE MARKS Drown by. DJL I I 1 I Checked by JDA I I 1 I I 1 PLoop ITLA N 2 Job No.: 020104 1 I I ...-------- DIRECTION OF SURFACE FLOW t ,2•.) Drawing No.: GRADING . i 1 1 i I I I 1 i .) SHEET NO. 2 i i 1 , 1 1 J a' 8 815"3-1.18.W I 011E15' I 1.3 / / -.. — -« — ∎mess � ■ r r-------------- _I-1 t■ �i FLOOD PLAIN • I i �:.■ BOUNDARY LINE / / ' I -.. `•1 ■■ T'r■ • . 4 Z T1 1 / EXISTING ■ I IF-0 A .. • CARETAKERS 1 it S- RESIDENCE /. 'z 6 ,e . 20/\:\t / I / I 2 °° • • /LAWN j \' 1, `y..94' ,; / / LANDSCAPED AREA ��� 6't HIGH SOLID \\ i \\ WOOD FENCE ,4- — ------ BLOCK WALL I"--- CONCRETE CURB F I / / 3' HIGH TAPERS FROM Q n W STORAGE 3'-0" TO 8" 0 �,3 CONCRETE N N SHED DIVIDERS = m 1 1 / /� `q A.C. PAVEMENT --7 < Z I EDGE OF A.C. E EXISTING PAVEMENT \ J • C$. 1, J Q 0 \ �J � J� I- \ CONCRETE CURE Q (� Q oC w I V COVERED� I I I I I�— �j M 8 STORAGE F y L_____J L J / -STORAGE Iv-6.1± HIGH SOLID U) >7M \ `Q 1 AREA i / AREA WOOD FENCE n w O cc co I EXTG. GARAGE / SHOP `� U z IL e m e I Q �z I II 1 II 1 II r Q 121-0" 43 -0 12 -0 r EXISTING• } W =W �-G B. I d' op 1 1,-- 6"11-011 ❑ EXTCs_ a N U • �' / BLDG. 'D' I i EXTG. WATER STORAGE SHED REVISIONS: f i QUALITY —may I A . I I� FACILITY I A . ,. �/ EDGE OF A.C. STORAGE f A . /PAVEMENT CONTAINERS I I \ I — — — — J. — — — — — — — 1 Date: 2-22-02 - - -+— •- -■— —, — — •- -• — , -•— •- -. — .- _. — - - — -. — ,_ _ _ Scale: 1"=20' Drawn NORTH Checked by. JDA • I I SITE PLAN Drawing ing 020104 Drawing No.: 020104 � ) EXISTING CONDMONS 1"=2 0' SHEET NO. _ 1.4 ■■1 I / r_________-__ I FLOOD PLAIN i 1 R�DPRpFF 0 ;;; �_ BOUNDARY LINE / / I I •;; °'� NF `/o Infili t• 'A _ / r- 16,507 r1 ii■ _:.■ ll'e,ee, '1'9� N. KEG elz I r<. oti�o I / (4. v) psi EXTG. CARE 1 TAKERS RESIDENCE / 1 I • • 6 BICYCLE RACK I 1 I / A x • N F P.' / N o, / e Q 9 8 NEW ACCESSIBLE ROUTE 0 N ° • r TO CONNECT TO EXISTING W .5 o'^' I /� J- 2 2m'-rd" 2m'-(d" A.G. ROUTE '7 / SPACES AT 20' = 40' PAVEMENT`� — Y _ \ X\`\\" y \ 100. _4" WIDE CC Z I 8 I ACCESSIBLE 36'-0" /\ ®� PAINTED Q O ROUTE � / i STRIPES J E Q (WHITE) J Q p _■ i I I I I I I I I I I I I I - 11111 l LI I I I I I I I �„ CU ® a I EXTG, i I i I 0 `18" WIDE PAINTS■i e EXI ING `' O 4 CATCH L-__--_J L J - W_' STRIPES (WHITE) ROUE ?C� \ BASIN OFFICE WAREHOUSE WAREHOUSE OFFICE 0 0 0 o I W U cc P A R K I N G D A T A c 1 31F SF / MANUF. / MANUF. 316 SF. 0 I ° Z O O `' 584 SF. 584 S.F. _ J NEW A.G. �-h • Z W Q I + SIDEWALK Q Q THE FOLLOWING "USE" AREAS HAVE BEEN l .�� FROM TOILET I Q �Z ASSUMED IN ORDER TO ESTIMATE IN BEST ROOM TO UQ JUDGMENT, THE NECESSARY PARKING / 12'-0" 1, 43'-0" 1, 12'-0" EXISTING EXISTING } _c =W SPACES REQUIRED I U C.B. ROUTE. 2E 'Cr Oa)j b-1'-0" 57'-4" EXTG. OFFICE 2 SPACES B ` '� / BLDG. 'D' 632 SF. ASSUMED � EXTG. WATER i } REVISIONS: (032 / 1,000 = .(03 x 2.70 = 1.1 (no) 1 QUALITY 1 1 /i\ 4-3-02 I; FACILITY '-A.C. 1 n . WAREHOUSE / MANUF. 1 SPACES \ i PAVEMENT PROPOSED 1,1(08 SF. ASSUMED . - ,', NEW RESTROOM 1 1,1(08 / 1,000 = 12 x 030 = 35 Date: 1 Scale: 1'=20' _I— —t-r.I— -41- -.1-_I_ -.1- -Y_ --X- -I_ -X- _%_%-%-[-I I % % I I % I I % % %-[ TOTAL REQUIRED SPACES 3 TOTAL SPACES PROVIDED 4 NORTH Drown by. DJL Checked by. JDA (EXTRA SPACE OR LOST SPACE ENLARGED SITE PLAN Job No.: 020104 AT START OF NEW ROUTE) Drawing No.: SIZE 1 STANDARD 2 PARALLEL PROPOSED IMPROVEMENTS 1"=20' SHEET NO. 1 DISABLED 2.1 / / r-------------- -« .- -� - :- - -\ , s ,"-.. I .:■ bi I • ill I 1 LIP. - Si 3 / / I v_ -■ • ■ / I - • / .1111 • / ■1111' Trey r/// 1 JI. e..T .�sy�P d‘6\,,,, rp o.-)..'c,.c,r:-.-. I s / I . "' �'' I a 6 QII 9 i ‘ N. j ■ •/ / � � I I 0 1 J , w c4^ / / I I.IIII EXISTING 12" STORM DRAIN LINE ■ Z I °o CC_, c I ®®� EXISTING �® CATCH BASIN J ao� � � 00 � � 0 � � � � � u0000000000000000000 ` ��CATCH _ � V_-_� I e€XTG. S.S. LINE Z cL g\ \ BASIN •, ,i 1 1 I i i u I ° A Rm0 Z L J L I i- :=, Q u0� 4 �Z 00 $ NEW 3"0 SAN TAR - Z R SEWER LINE. TIE W O�O I INTO EXISTING I Q Z X S.S. LINE w EXISTING �" STORM DRAIN LINE EXTG. L =Q CATCH # 1)-- o � opt; I,,,----y---- BASIN EXTG. N U m I -gam- BLDG. 'D' EXITING WATER I REVISIONS: I I i QUALITY FACILITY i n Al n+ . Date: 2-22-02 - - _._ --,- -.- - -x- -I- -._.-_-_-_ x _ x I _ Scale: 1"=20' Drawn by. DJL NORTH Checked by. LA i FACILITIES PLAN Job No: 020104 AC Drawing No.: SITEJIL PROPOSED IMPROVEMENTS 1„-20� SHEET NO. 2.3 FLOOD PLAIN / -9141 - try ��,J ▪ m% BOUNDARY LINE i I -�� �►� ��� o -lt �� I I /1,0%) v I :; / gi / I I I -' o rn �� F FILL PIPE IW CONC. .T* �^ferlooTU roro / . I". Z 'I / CARETAKERS 1111 I ' :'� RESIDENCE EXISTING I ' r•GAL,/PPE S limmumn CURB / rri;�L F i? i I PANTED GREEN in ' ,1k::lo qti • ( T /(,. r"' crd, �' / I% cc z :..c.,-- , 7, , - 1 O s• s• N. • EXISTING FENCE 2 b I I I I - W " EXTG. LAWN r l �'Lii/ .- �� 4k� �ys -EXIStING CURB cs4 11 BICYCLE RAC,' ��� t N \I " / 1 /—'- -� CMU BLOCK o / 5z / WALL TAPERS / w STORAGE e /� 3' HIGH �''� FROM 3' TO 8" �•� V N 3 0 SHED �C4 S CONCRETE '/9 3/ W o / / DIVIDERS g 5 r • X X 7 A.G. PAVEMENT 144.1e I I c \\9-,,--, . _6(..)0.2 \/(1).4) VC- - JO GG1000G 000GGGG 0 0GGGG11 GGGG0 0 GGG0G',\ ® _I a° \ EX CATCH -_' , - ,.� _- BAs �,/.39, i i i ' 141.45 I m W CC 0 L J L J �� I CD CD ><—M \ C'� OFFICE WAREHOUSE /'WAREHOUSE / OFFICE NEW BIGI'C_E o O 1 316 SF. MANUF. MANUF. 316 S.F. RACK SEE I Z O O 17 S84 SF. S84 SF. I „ SHEET 3.2 } WOW O NEW A.G. w 1.- EXISTING LANDSCAPE PLANING SCHEDULE I nip �_ -- 1 SIDEWALK 1 Q woo CCII1ON NAM EXISTING CATCH 7 t j� aT1' D71'EOL BOTANICAL NN'E Ng SPACING U �' W lc ��, Mv,..<< ,.,, ADDNCUN J - BASIN �.1-5s,/ FENCE I R "4 or•�� DT71f4x � `� PROPOSED -`'� 8 EXTG. U • D A!®ORVRAE C TOILET ROOM `� BLDG. 'D' REVISIONS: 2' nwA OCC.d"LNeAGO T I-EIGHT ''O� � EXTG. WATER f i QUALITY i �/ n A . I CI O1 etallE TAL"'"f°° D•., AD eNOUrr FAG IL ITY A.G. PAVEMENT �,� I A • .►. `■ # n 2 „ �� 24•a AD ENCUN �I 13.J.S / — — — '� — 1 Date: 2-22-02 —•_ - =K— —.— =r— -r —■— , —__•- - - —x— —x— —:— —,— —.— Scale: 1"=20' Drawn by. DJL NORTH Checked by. JDA /111- I LANDSCAPE / GRADING PLAN Drawing No.: LANDSCAPE EXISTING GRADES -20 SHEET NO. 2.2 111•1•1 ►1c• § mom .l,■ � ETAL ROOF PANELS '_0 • (RED) ill i 5353 . •-• IIIIIHIIIHHIIIIIIIII ■ Tr u iii• • EXTERIOR LIGHT ' -§ OPEN OPEN AT EA. MANDOOR -J, o TYP. i O (� D -. �� !_ I THIS END OPEN ETAL WALL PANELS — 14. �v �Q'\� (Wl-IITE) ADDRESS �' AS Z �`-' �i DETERMINED BY o 0 0 0 �'.. NORTHELEV. CITY OF TIGARD _ f �-Y ���1 EXISTING 1/16" = I'-0" "� • METAL ROOF PANELS INFILL THIS WALL NORTH ELEVATION METALTROOF APANELS �` (RED) DRY STORAGE PROPOSED 1/s" = 1'-0" (RED) uJ ,` METAL ROOF PANELS METAL WALL PANELS r/ — (RED) 4I (WHITE) W OPEN 9 9 9 9mm ` METAL WALL PANELS ` U c N / \ �� CWHITE) ^F, OVERED STORAGE ETAL WALL PANELS S[ SOUTH ELEV. r _ .CL E Z INFILL THIS WALL EXISTING 1/16" = 1'-0" _ G ---\-�� _ wOg ETAL ROOF PANELS ELECTRICAL (, LL 0 cc (RED) EAST ELEVATION SERvICE PANELS WEST ELEVATION z z° 0 Fri m PROPOSED 1/s" = 1'-0" PROPOSED I/s" = 1'-0" Q Q G ETAL WALL PANELS V (WHITE) w EAST ELEVATION SURFACE d N O 0 ter) L IGI-1T-TYP. EXISTING 1/16" = 1'-0" REVISIONS: wow n A . A . _ OPEN OPEN OPEN Dote: 2-22-02 0 Scale: 1/8"=1'-0 Drawn by DJL Checked by JDA • WEST ELEVATION Job No.: 020104 INFILL THIS WALL ETAL WALL PANELS Drawing No.: elev EXISTING 1/16" = l'-0" SOUTH ELEVATION (WHITE) SHEET NO. ' PROPOSED vs" = 1'-0" 3.1 =i on ; • NENE :_. `- Trill Ti V ...w N. Iwo 4, o c ' Y o k..----ALL EXTERIOR Q- r R- FINISHES TO L-` :_.-„=_ j /// 0 MATCH EXISTING �-- -- • BUILDING D _ • —tOILEt ROOM g� ADDITION Q 6 BUILDING "D" ELEVATION E M ix L.r2 • NORTH ELEVATION 1/8"=V-o" ^F he• cc Q z - FILL PIPE W/ CONC. "" J p (SMOOTH TOP) J Q Q QZWa s) F- F m El 9 IC GALv. PIPE Q LL U }_i- Z 0 0 ii::.------ z . . rn 4" 0 GALv. PIPE Q CC p 0 PAINTED GREEN U � 3' 3" `R q 0 ;r■ Own // // CONCRETE REVISIONS: A I Ir . 9 I I I A /\---____-- A . ALL EXTERIOR FINISHES TO L J I Date: 2-22-02 TOILET ROOM/ MATCH EXISTING ;n Scale: 2-22-02 ADDITION BUILDING D ` L - - _I, Drawn by. DJL BUILDING 'D Job No Checked ELEVATION BICYCLE RACK d by. JDA ' Job No.: 020104 • WEST ELEVATION 1/8"-r- -o" Drawing No.: P—ELEV SHEET NO. 3.2 4, CITY OF TIGARD Community Development Shaping Better Community LAND USE PROPOSAL DESCRIPTION 120 DAYS = 8/6/2002 FILE NOS.: SITE DEVELOPMENT REVIEW (SDR) 2002-00004 Type H Land Use Application FILE TITLE: 74TH AVENUE INDUSTRIAL PARK REMODEL APPLICANT: Jim Castile OWNER: Same 15715 SW 74th Avenue Tigard, OR 97224 REQUEST: The applicant is proposing to upgrade the existing shop/garage structure into a leaseable commercial/industrial space, which will consist of 2 small offices and a storage or light manufacturing area. The scope of the project will be performed within the existing building envelope. LOCATION: 15715 SW 74th Avenue; WCTM 2S112DC, Tax Lot 1500. ZONE: I-P: Industrial Park District. The I-P zoning district provides appropriate locations for combining light manufacturing, office and small-scale commercial uses, e.g., restaurants, personal services and fitness centers, in a campus-like setting. Only those light industrial uses with no off-site impacts, e.g., noise, glare, odor, vibration, are permitted in the I-P zone. In addition to mandatory site development review, design and development standards in the I-P zone have been adopted to insure that developments will be well-integrated, attractively landscaped, and pedestrian-friendly. APPLICABLE REVIEW Community Development Code Chapters 18.360, 18.390, 18.530, 18.705, 18.725, CRITERIA: 18.745, 18.755, 18.765, 18.790, 18.795 and 18.810. CIT AREA: South CIT FACILITATOR: List Available Upon Request DECISION MAKING BODY BELOW: ❑ TYPE I ® TYPE II ❑ TYPE III ❑ TYPE IV DATE COMMENTS WERE SENT: APRIL 17, 2002 DATE COMMENTS ARE DUE: MAY 1, 2002 ❑HEARINGS OFFICER (MON.) DATE OF HEARING: TIME: 7:00 PM ❑PLANNING COMMISSION (MON.) DATE OF HEARING: TIME: 7:00 PM ❑CITY COUNCIL (TUES.) DATE OF HEARING: TIME: 7:30 PM ® STAFF DECISION (TENTATIVE) DATE OF DECISION: MAY 14, 2002 II COMPONENTS RELATED TO THE PROJECT AVAILABLE FOR VIEWING IN THE PLANNING DIVISION ® VICINITY MAP ® LANDSCAPING PLAN Z IMPACT STUDY ® SITE PLAN Z SITE ELEVATIONS ❑ TRAFFIC IMPACT STUDY ® NARRATIVE ❑ GEOTECH REPORT ® OTHER: MISCELLANEOUS STAFF CONTACT: Mathew Scheidegger, Assistant Planner (503) 639-4171, Ext. 317 PUBLIC FACILITY PLAN Project: 14th Ave. Industrial Park COMPLETENESS CHECKLIST Date: 3/11/02 GRADING ® Existing and proposed contours shown. ® Does proposed grading impact adjacent parcels? ❑ Yes ® No ® Adjacent parcel grades shown. STREET ISSUES ❑ Right-of-way clearly shown. ® Centerline of street(s) clearly shown. ® Street name(s) shown. ® Existing/proposed curb or edge of pavement shown. ❑ Street profiles shown. n/a ❑ Future Street Plan: Must show street profiles, topo n/a on adjacent parcel(s), etc. ❑ Traffic Impact Report n/a ® Street grades compliant? ® Street widths dimensioned and appropriate? ❑ Private Streets? Less than 6 lots and width n/a appropriate? ❑ Other: SANITARY SEWER ISSUES ® Existing/proposed lines shown. ❑ Stubs to adjacent parcels required/shown? n/a WATER ISSUES ® Existing/proposed lines w/sizes noted? ® Existing/proposed fire hydrants shown? ® Proposed meter location and size shown? ® Proposed fire protection system shown? STORM DRAINAGE AND WATER QUALITY ISSUES ® Existing/proposed lines shown? ❑ Preliminary sizing calcs for water quality/detention n/a: Not adding impervious area above what provided? existing WQ facility was designed to accommodate. ® Water quality/detention facility shown on plans? Existing ® Area for facility match requirements from calcs? ® Facility shown outside any wetland buffer? ❑ Storm stubs to adjacent parcels required/shown? n/a The submittal is here• deemed ® COMPLETE ❑ INCOMPLETE By: •_ . Date: 3/1 1/02 REVISED: 03/11/02 hwalidlPILO u�� March 15, 2002 CITY OF TIGARD OREGON Jim Castile 15715 SW 74th Ave. Tigard, OR 97224 RE: Notice of Incomplete Submittal-SDR2002-00004 Dear Mr. Castile: The City received your request for Site Development Review (SDR) approval for the above-referenced project. Based on a preliminary review of your application materials, Staff has determined that your submittal is incomplete for the purposes of continuing with Site Development Review. The following clarifications and additional information are required before Staff can consider your application complete and begin the review: 1. Pedestrian crossings of traffic aisles are permitted for distances no greater than 36 feet. 2. Bicycle parking areas shall be provided at locations within 50 feet of the primary entrance of the proposed building. Once the required information has been submitted, Staff will deem the application complete and begin the review process. If you have any questions about the information contained in this letter, please feel free to contact me at (503) 639-4171 , x317. Sincerely, athew Scheidegger Assistant Planner is\cu rp I n\m a t h e w\s d r\S D R2 002-000 04.a cc.d oc.d of c: SDR2002-00004 Land Use file 13125 SW Hall Blvd., Tigard, OR 97223 (503) 639-4171 TDD (503) 684-2772 . . NicoIi Engineering , Inc. ■ PO Box 23784 Tigard, Oregon 97281 • Phone: (503) 620-2086 Fa x: (503) 684-3636 April 3, 2002 NEI#: 02-0104 City of Tigard ATTN: Mathew Scheidegger 13125 SW Hall Blvd Tigard, OR 97223 RE: Notice of Incomplete Submittal —SDR2002-00004 Dear Mr. Scheidegger: The following numbered responses correspond to your Notice of Incomplete Submittal dated March 15, 2002: 1 . Additional curbing has been added adjacent to the pedestrian path, which reduces the traffic aisle crossing to 36 feet. 2. Bicycle parking has been relocated to within 50' of the primary entrance. Enclosed please find the new plan, sheet 2.1 (inserted in all 21 packets), which reflects these changes. If you have any further questions regarding this matter please do not hesitate to contact our office at your earliest convenience. Sincerely, James Andrews, Project Manager jda/hmb enclosures: cc: Jim Castile, Owner (without plan) X\J-020104\Letters 5Response to Incomplete Submittal.doc 9025 SW Center Street Tigard, OR 97223 — www.nicoliengineering.com 6. III CITY OF TIGARD OREGON April 10, 2002 Jim Castile 15715 SW 74th Avenue Tigard, OR 97224 RE: Notice of Complete Submittal-SDR2002-00004 Dear Mr. Castile: The City has received the information necessary to begin the review of your Site Development Review application. Staff has, therefore, deemed your application submittal as complete on 4/8/2002 and will begin the review process. The estimated time for rendering a decision from the date an application is deemed as complete is 6-8 weeks. If you have any questions regarding your application or if I can answer any questions, please don't hesitate to contact me at (503) 639-4171, x317. Sincerely, .l , .ri ,, 7 Mathew Scheideq r Assistant Planner is\curpin\mathew\sdr\SDR2002-00004.acc.acc. c: SDR2002-00004 Land Use file 13125 SW Hall Blvd., Tigard, OR 97223 (503) 639-4171 TDD (503)684-2772 Nicoll Engineering , Inc. Mik PO Box 23784 Tigard, Oregon 97281 • Phone: (503) 620-2086 • Fax: (503) 684-3636 LETTER OF TRANSMITTAL DATE 29•02 Jolla i 2 _bt c9. ATTENTION vw•LQV . RE TO ejxt/1 f fi"41 Giti b w4aM i fem.: WE ARE SENDING YOU ❑ Attached ❑ Under separate cover via The following items: ❑ Shop Drawings C"Prints ❑ Plans ❑ Samples ❑ Specifications ❑ Copy of Letter ❑ Change Order [ 'Other: •Y2x11 _t,,, dow- . COPIES DATE NO. DESCRIPTION Iti 2.22.62 .41 8% x 11 ,.,, I(P Z •/2- • 2 • _ cLe., • _ _ ..._ '.-..........a.-.v I 2 .22•6? 1 t �.,L_, " •. l+' 11 f--- S GTS t3. rvJGIOPe S TO r ?r a p.Cr 'A OGOV\IAr•S THESE ARE TRANSMITTED AS CHECKED BELOW: ❑ For approval ❑ Approved as submitted ❑ Resubmit Copies for approval ❑ For your use ❑ Approved as noted ❑ Submit Copies for distribution ❑ As requested ❑ Returned for corrections ❑ Return Corrected prints L3.-Ror review and comment ❑ Other: ❑ FOR BIDS DUE 20 ❑ Prints returned after loan to us REMARKS COPY TO SIGNED; 5Dt,20,M41-00 ■ VNicoli Engineering , Inc. PO Box 23784 Tigard, Oregon 97281 Phone: 620-2086 • Fax: (503) 684-3636 January 21, 2002 NEI#: 02-0104 RECEIVED PLANNING Interested Party JAN 2 3 2002 RE: Neighborhood Meeting Notification Calf ac TIGARD FOR: 15715 74th Avenue Tigard, Oregon Tax Map #: 2E1129C Tax Lot #: 1500 To Whom It May Concern: Nicoli Engineering is representing, the owner of the property know as 74th Avenue Industrial Park (see attached vicinity map). The owner is proposing to convert an existing garage/shop into a commercial use and add a toilet facility to an existing building. Prior to applying to the City of Tigard for the necessary permits, we would like to discuss the proposal in more detail with the surrounding property owners and residents. You are invited to attend a meeting Tuesday, February 12, 2002 at our offices located at 9025 SW Center, Tigard Oregon at 6:00 p.m. Please realize this will be an informational meeting to discuss preliminary plans. These plans may be altered prior to the submittal of the application to the City of Tigard. We look forward to more specifically discussing the proposal with you. Please call me at the number above it you have any questions. Sincerely, c James Andrews Project Manager jda/hmb enclosures X V.1-020104\Letters1Preliminary Public Meeting.doc 9025 SW Center Street Tigard, OR 97223 _ www.nicoliengineering.com anrw� \ 311•11.311./00 W ��wlAw ■� ir,. — — N N'•MY — — ales• — — — — ..r_—I I I I —_�■ E Y tr- am MIWIDARY LE.. 3 -■ BUILDING'A' I i 0 •E1 1 15615 I rri o�rri r i z z 14 j 1 O PROJECT DATA ■ C ":I r TAX MAP NO.: 25112DC 1 \ ` Z 1 , O 1 TAX MAP NO. 25 112DC TAX LOT . 1500 V I I I 11,_I I I I .it 3 I i TAX LOT NO. 1500 I -I I PREVIOUS SITE DEVELOPMENT CARETAKERS RESIDENCE 8 15715 o BUILDING'B' t n , , I O I REVIEW NO. : 91-00002 I / I 15655 En I I I I r tl I /� oi I j�. U 1 I y 1 I� I ' Pao/ / / - Ia j 1� j g gI / / �� i �.— BUILDING 'C' 'PI I l a I z$ / g r MOTU ZONE 0 ILA / I ,d I � r� / 1 I I CC / _c _� lei— %Y / - BUILDING'D' I � <2m / �a 1 15757 w 1.7. 7.i 81 / anerY w — — — WQ Z l.il Q V w I / PROPOSED REST ROOM I Z�O' / `I 1"1Zj / I Q Q l\ » EXISTING GARAGE /SHOP STRUCTURE TO ISE CONVERTED TO COMMERCIAL USE. VICINITY MAP g \ °"° DNS I5\. Q • \ NORTH i SITE PLAN 1111jr Dote: 1-21-02 3 Dote: 1'460' Grown by DJ- �$ NTS �M Checked by .DA Job No.: 020104 I' •, Drorny No.: NEIp1. P SHEET NO. 4Y W kame• O1�"" •W DATE: /- 2 ^ V 17:-.1 PLANS CHECK NO. PROJECT E: j g 7.0 OZ COUNTYWIDE C 7Y rN ct pwL0 TRAFFIC IMPACT FEE WORKSHEET APPLICANT: (FOR NON-SINGLE FAMILY USES) MAILING ADDRESS: CITY/ZIP/PHONE: TAX MAP NO.: SITES NO.ADDRESS: LAND USE CATEGORY RATE PER TRIP RESIDENTIAL $226.00 BUSINESS AND COMMERCIAL $ 57.00 OFFICE $ 207.00 ,5 7-j 7,4-T6 INDUSTRIAL $217.00 INSTITUTIONAL $ 94.00 PAYMENT METHOD: CASH/CHECK CREDIT BANCROFT(PROMISSORY NOTE) LAND USE CATEGORY DESCRIPTION OF USE WEEKDAY AVG. INSTITUTIONAL ONLY: TRIP RATE WEEKEND AVG.TRIP RATE DEFER TO OCCUPANCY BASIS: 10/101 e.C.mil 1 /9/'a/Do.1eJ C tIL*.s fr(..c e 7C'' .Uf'G.J (. �..S (d'f�1.y /a 8 r] wa 14 0 use #1 432 o��• P CALCULATIONS: W/ it1,2 3 7 = 171.38 x /./48 s '12 7 D3-g'cP q. l(,3/ x. . 632- X 34 2 c'/ 2-j 1 , PROJECT TRIP ,I I I GENERATION: /7 FOR ACCOUNTING PURPOSES ONLY ADDITIONAL NOTES: ROAD AMT TRANSIT AMT. 2 ff. PREPARED BY: S.S. Casper I:TIFWKST.DOC (DST) EFF: 07-01-98 7131(32 Conditions A .ciated with Case #: SDR21 00004 2:55:16 PM Cond. Stat. Changed Updated Code Title Hold Status Changed By Tag Updated By 0001 REVISE PARKING PLAN 0 Met 7/3/02 MAS 1. Provide a plan showing 5%of the total parking spaces reserved for carpool/vanpool use. 0001 BICYCLE PKNG. STRUCTURE 0 Met 7/3/02 MAS 2. Provide a plan showing directional signs indicating the direction of the bicycle parking structure. 0001 PROVIDE BICYCLE RACK 0 Met 7/3102 MAS 3.Provide a plan that shows a 2-stall bicycle rack designed according to Section 18.765.050.C.of the Tigard Development Code. Page 1 of 1 . . NicoIi Engineering , Inc. INK■ PO Box 23784 Tigard, Oregon 97281 • Phone: (503) 620-2086 • Fax: (503) 684-3636 July 2, 2002 NEI#: 02-0104 City of Tigard RECEIVED ATTN: Mathew Scheidegger 13125 SW Hall Blvd Tigard, OR 97223 CITY OF TIGARD PLANNING/ENGINEERING RE: 74th Avenue Industrial Park Remodel: SDR2002-00004 Dear Mr. Scheidegger: The following numbered responses correspond to the Site Development Review; Section II dated April 2002: General Comments: The Building Department has reviewed the documents and a ramp system will be required for site accessibility to the remodeled shop. The proposed ramp system has been noted on the revised documents. 1. The carpool/vanpool parking spaces have been noted on sheet 1.1. 2. The directional bicycle parking signs have been noted on sheet 1.1. 3. The bicycle rack detail can be found on sheet 2.1. Sincerely, .. A---- ia--/—tom James Andrews, Project Manager jda/hmb enclosures: • X U-0201041Letters\Response to Planning Department doc 9025 SW Center Street Tigard, OR 97223— www.nicoliengineering.com -. \ nA I: u�tL,wo f _ . . •L!!E N 89'51'48"E I ■ -- a �•i _ 534ID0' t I I I W.A. o� T'r.' N 4.0LND°GPARYPLA1-1NE N :•!� ..' ,'A' ' ,., ■ ' � � h"J� BUILDING A . .. - N IN -- LDING `�I:�: :: :■ 'A >�scAfpE GI � 'r,■ _ �� \ 15615 =r,'; i YPI AL Mom '- "_ (6,400 SF.) I I T ' ' -- 0 , __"pill I ' ! V � i 3 u; GARPO•L/YANP•OL' .- r, 1 I I =': 0 totO PARKING AND SIGN : VEHICULAR I / *: - = o =' Z rn I S OT D © -� : ACCESS / EGRESS ,�_nia L2.,CP 6 CARETAKERS RESIDENCE ' in I j i m ' `) BUILDING 'B' [,. 1:::::; I z141 z H o t ■ ' i I cQ - �. 15715 :. ^:: '= 15655 Z 1 Z T _ t I i Ul I ' ' (1,266.5 SF.) / 15, 60 SF.) I, k'l I r _ _ r 0 / _ I � CARPOOL/VANPOOL ,♦ • I : . :;T PARKING AND SIGN :■ 1 �\ ■ p a II / : BUILDING 'C' : I I I I J z - ! - - 15717 ;!.■ 'C ' a RA / :'•- :.! P 15,,60 _ ; I t--1 ' a W BICYCLE RACK �„sR ta,�:. SF.) ■ U N o AND SIGN. . / .���.....M • __ .07 •:•••�■ I 1 I O I ■ M cc Ix SEE SHT. 2.1 /' 1T~' . - :'`r ,J Nrilanillil– _ o� / I ��1 —�.*w�.�,.s � I G GL � W ,-.�% I � I � I tai 7 °a'r' / Al . SIG1�z A -- I I I I. AM,YLI I 225'# ,i177:' ,,,,.., J► ,' 251 f ,y ■ ' VEHICULAR I CC Z 4'• ;7 ITINIAME �/ iii,■viiiiiiiii�.viiiiiiii :■■■■.■..■ CBCI PARKING J Q Q I / I k :� BUILDING ID, ■ I G DIRECTIONAL Q v WI : ., L, I ■ ARROW POINTED Z cc Q / I •ti: .. W r ° :,'�:^ -- ` I 15757 i TWA—• RAK-TYP. F / `� . " ::�--. a — � (6,000 SF.) - ;; ; .■ CORMS 5 89'5148 W 341.n , V z /. I T ., 1 Z OOH I I _ / PROJECT BOUNDARY � PROPOSED TOILET ROOM (19 SF.)1 W OZ W O / SEE ENLARGED PLANS > CC \ Q Z �Z5'uen wo j Q EXISTING SHOP / GARAGE L STRUCTURE TO BE UPGRADED o O III \ AS REQUIRED FORA CHANGE iliE N. O(1)m \ OF USE / OCCUPANCY. (1,909 SF.) • SIGNAGE NOTES: REVISIONS: I \ SITE AREA: 5 55 A.G. (100%) /1\ 4-3-02 • LOCATE BICYCLE PARKING DIRECTIONAL SIGNAGE " BUILDING AREA:-32,240 S.F. (13%) PROJECT DATA A 6-28-02 IN LANDSCAPE ISLANDS. SIGNAGE SHALL PROVIDE n WETLANDS PAVEMENT: 53329.5 S.F. (22%) SDR CONDITIONS A CLEAR DIRECTION'S TO THE NEW BICYCLE PARKING \L LANDSCAPING: 156,128 S.F. (65%) TAX MAP NO. 2S 112DC PER CITY OF TIGARD RACK \ TAX LOT NO. 1500 Dote: 2-22-02 a Scale: 1"=60' • CARPOOL/VANPOOL SIGNAGE SHALL BE LOCATED ON 4 rl NORTH Drawn by. Di THE FACE OF THE BUILDING ADJACENT TO THE I EXTG. CONDITIONS SITE PLAN Checked by 020104 DESIGNATED SPACE. I • ALL SIGNAGE SHALL MEET CITY STANDARDS. I'D \ I"=60' Drawing No.: MST-SITE LOCATE BICYCLE PARKING DIRECTIONAL SIGNAGE SHEET NO. IN LANDSCAPE ISLANDS. 5IGNAGE SHALL PROVIDE 5 89.51'48"W 201.05' i A CLEAR DIREGTIONAS TO THE NEW BICYCLE PARKING 1.1 RACK / / r-------------- I - _. - .r �. -.� �� t� 6 3 FLOOD PLAIN I 1 0 iii I BOUNDARY LINE i � 1 ��� / I v ■ t ■� 'Jill• '� PILL PIPE W/ CONC. Tr• ' (SMOOTH TOP) . - / I Z - / , ;:I A r I AN .I■ w ■■■1 Tr. �' 1 C ezi / / 1 8 47-114, GALV. PIPE � �O4ti 1 (.. kr ' °es c' r NCO ~o �_ �� 0 ��- 1 �_ t� co m EXTG. CARE 1 c,∎)\ ,PQO 3 / TAKERS RESIDENCE i '\ 4" GALv. PIPE - I , r PAINTED GREEN .6 BICYCLE RACK 1 I N, -,.}, P-,.}, P �� / in / A SEE DTL• i 1 3" 3" r r It P0 W N \ N • / sE f 4 ! I I /-CoNCRETE 8 NEW ACCESSIBLE ROUTE 0 6 i r - TO CONNECT TO EXISTING w o 0 j I I j I /\ 20'-0" 20'-m" A.G. ROUTE 3 5 i=) I I I 2 SPACES AT 20' = 40' �7 PAvEMENT \ 1 4" WIDE CC Z l_ _I I I 0 ACCESSIBLE 1- 36'-0" � /\ PAINTED < O L - - - J I (ROUTE 1 �� i STRIPES E °\ -. (WHITE) -I E •BICYCLE RACK ,� CURB s Z EXTG. i i i hOICE 18" WIDE PAINTE II CATCH. L J L j STRIPES (WHITE) 1 m ROUE CD W O\ BASIN OICE WAREHOUSE WAREHOUS - P A R K I N C� D A T A 1 316 SF. / B4 SF. / MANUF. 316 5F. e I ZZ 0 0 584 SP. 7 ZWo THE FOLLOWING "USE" AREAS HAVE SEEN e I �� > ~ ASSUMED IN ORDER TO ESTIMATE IN BEST I ` � t / 4" WIDE PA NTED Y �� Q cI-z UQ JUDGMENT, THE NECESSARY PARKING , 12'-0" 43'-0" 12'-0" re STRIPES ln_ - _Cg5< SPACES REQUIRED o bl'-0" 5l'-4" I� U O) I ,�— �� EXTG. OFFICE 2 SPACES / r \� ��� r ■ --'1 BLDG. 'D' 632 SF. ASSUMED i i EXTG. WATER 1 EXISTING ■ REVISIONS: 632 / 1,000 = 63 x 210 = 1.1 / QUALITY � C$ ' ■ /\ 4-3-02 FACILITY J ' A.C. `-Q ■ PROPOSED 1 ■ SDR CONDITIONS WAREHOUSE / MANUF. 1 SPACES \ PAVEMENt NEW RESTROOM PER CITY OF TIGARD 1,168 S.F. ASSUMED �+ 1,168 / 1,000 = 12 x 030 = 35 / ■■■ �■■ ESIM■■■ Date: ti - - —_— - _ —_— —r—�— — —■_.- -_—_—.—_—._._.—. .—_—_— ._.—.— Scale: 1'=20' TOTAL REQUIRED SPACES 3 TOTAL SPACES PROVIDED 4 NORTH NEW SIDEWALK AND Drawn by. Dl AT START SPACE OR LOST SPACE ENLARGED SITE PLAN RAMP FROM SHOP Checked by LA START OF NEW ROUTE) Job No.: 020104 TO NEW RESTROOM Drawing No.: SITE 1 STANDARD 2 PARALLEL \ / PROPOSED IMPROVEMENTS 1"=20' n SHEET NO. 1 DISABLED 2.1