The URL can be used to link to this page

SDR2002-00010 SDR2002 - 0001O CINGULAR COMMUNICATIONS MONOPOLE TOWER #2 NOTICE OF TYPE II DECISION SITE DEVELOPMENT REVIEW (SDR) 2002-00010 j 't CITY OF TIGARD CINGULAR COMMUNICATIONS MONOPOLE TOWER #2 Community(Development Shaping Better Community 120 DAYS = 11/5/2002 SECTION I. APPLICATION SUMMARY FILE NAME: CINGULAR COMMUNICATIONS MONOPOLE TOWER #2 CASE NOS.: Site Development Review (SDR) SDR2002-00010 PROPOSAL: The applicant is proposing to construct a 100-foot monopole tower for telecommunications service. The associated accessory equipment will be placed within a fenced and landscaped enclosure. APPLICANT: Salmon PcS, Inc. OWNER: Clean Water Services 123 NE 3' Ave, Suite 240 155 N. First Avenue, Suite 270 Portland, OR 97232 Hillsboro, OR 97124 APPLICANT'S REP: Mericom Corporation Attn: Chris Tigh 2701 NW Vaughn Street, Suite 890 Portland, OR 97210 LOCATION: 16580 SW 85th Avenue; WCTM 2S113B0, Tax Lot 00600. The subject site is located within the Clean Water Services Sewer Treatment Plant, south of Durham Road. ZONE: I-P: Industrial Park District. The I-P zoning district provides appropriate locations for combining light manufacturing, office and small-scale commercial uses, e.g., restaurants, personal services and fitness centers, in a campus-like setting. Only those light industrial uses with no off-site impacts, e.g., noise, glare, odor, vibration, are permitted in the I-P zone. In addition to mandatory site development review, design and development standards in the I-P zone have been adopted to insure that developments will be well-integrated, attractively landscaped, and pedestrian-friendly. APPLICABLE REVIEW CRITERIA: Community Development Code Chapters 18.390, 18.530, 18.705, 18.745, 18.765, 18.795, 18.798 and 18.810. SECTION II. DECISION Notice is hereby given that the City of Tigard Community Development Director's designee has APPROVED the above request subject to certain conditions of approval The findings and conclusions on which the decision is based are noted in Section VI. NOTICE OF TYPE II DECISION SDR2002-00010/CINGULAR COMMUNICATIONS MONOPOLE PAGE 1 OF 20 CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL THE FOLLOWING CONDITIONS SHALL BE SATISFIED PRIOR TO THE ISSUANCE OF SITE/BUILDING PERMITS: Submit to the Planning Division (Morgan Tracy, 501.639-4171T-6A 2428) for review and approval: 1. The applicant/owner shall provide a revised landscape plan to ensure that the evergreen shrubs will reach 6 feet in height and 95% opacity within three years, and form a continuous hedge. Alternately, if the applicant believes that the proposed landscape plan will satisfy this standard, then the applicant shall certify that the standard will be met. 2. The applicant shall submit a revised elevation drawing indicating the color of the proposed monopole. Unless the applicant has been directed by the FAA, the color of the monopole shall be a non-reflective galvanized gray finish. 3. The applicant/owner shall provide satisfactory legal evidence, in the form of deeds, easements, leases or contracts to establish the joint access. Submit to the Engineering Department (Brian Rager, 639-4171, ext. 2471) for review and approval: 4. The owner is required to construct street improvements to SW 85th Avenue as part of a prior land use approval. The applicant shall provide a future improvements guarantee for the frontage of SW 85 prior to issuance of a site permit to assure that the street will be improved. 5. Prior to issuance of a site permit, a public facility improvement permit will be required if any work is to occur in the public right-of-way. If no work within the right-of-way is necessary, this condition will not apply. 6. An erosion control plan shall be provided as part of the public improvement drawings. The plan shall conform to "Erosion Prevention and Sediment Control Plans - Technical Guidance Handbook, February 1994." 7. The applicant shall pay the water quality fee in-lieu or provide a water quality facility that meets CWS regulations. THE FOLLOWING CONDITIONS SHALL BE SATISFIED PRIOR TO A FINAL BUILDING INSPECTION: Submit to the Engineering Department (Brian Rager, 639-4171, ext. 318) for review and approval: 8. Prior to a final building inspection, the applicant shall complete any work in the public right-of-way or public easement (if applicable) and obtain approval from the Engineering Department. THIS APPROVAL SHALL BE VALID FOR EIGHTEEN (18) MONTHS FROM THE EFFECTIVE DATE OF THIS DECISION. SECTION III. BACKGROUND INFORMATION Site History Staff conducted a search of City records for the subject property. This site has been the subject of numerous permits, including building and electrical permits, as well as two conditional use approvals in 1990 (Case File Nos. CUP 90-00002, and CUP 90-00003), and another in 1999 (CUP 1999-00003). These are all related to various expansions and improvements of the sewer treatment plant. There is an existing lattice telecommunications tower that was constructed prior to the parcel being incorporated into the city. No other land use cases associated with this parcel were found. NOTICE OF TYPE II DECISION SDR2002-00010/CINGULAR COMMUNICATIONS MONOPOLE PAGE 2 OF 20 This parcel and surrounding properties are zoned I-P with the exception of the Durham Elementary School, zoned R-12 with an Historic District Overlay to the northeast and Tigard High School, zoned R-4.5 to the west. The City of Durham lies directly south of the subject parcel. Vicinity Information: The subject site is located south of Durham Road and east of SW 85th Avenue. Site Information and Proposal Description: The applicant is proposing to construct a 100-foot monopole tower for telecommunications service. The associated accessory equipment will be placed within a fenced and landscaped enclosure. SECTION IV. COMMENTS FROM PROPERTY OWNERS WITHIN 500 FEET No comments were received from residents or nearby property owners. SECTION V. SUMMARY OF APPLICABLE REVIEW CRITERIA The proposal's consistency with these Code Chapters is reviewed in the following sections: A. Zoning Districts 18.530 (Industrial Zoning Districts) B. Applicable Development Code Standards 18.705 Access Egress and Circulation) 18.745 Landscaping and Screening) 18.765 Off-Street parking and loading requirements) 18.780 Signs) 18.795 Visual Clearance) 18.798 Wireless Communication Facilities) C. Specific DR Approval Criteria 18.360 D. Street and Utility Improvement Standards 18.810 E. Impact Study 18.390 SECTION VI. APPLICABLE DEVELOPMENT CODE STANDARDS A. ZONIING DISTRICTS Industrial Zoning District: Section 18.530.020 Lists the description of the Industrial Zoning Districts. The site is located in the I-P: Industrial Park District. The proposed use, a Wireless Communications Facility, is permitted in this zone subject to the limitations of Chapter 18.798. Development Standards: Section 18.530.040.B States that Development standards in industrial zoning districts are contained in Table 18.530.2 below: NOTICE OF TYPE II DECISION SDR2002-00010/CINGULAR COMMUNICATIONS MONOPOLE PAGE 3 OF 20 TABLE 18.530.2 DEVELOPMENT STANDARDS IN INDUSTRIAL ZONES STANDARD I-P Proposed Minimum Lot Size None 66.5 acres -Detached unit - -Boarding, lodging, rooming house Minimum Lot Width 50 ft 750 ft. Minimum Setbacks -Front yard 35 ft. 1000 ft. -Side facing street on corner&through lots 20 ft. - -Side yard 50 ft[1] 250/1200 ft. -Side or rear yard abutting more restrictive zoning district - - Rear yard 50 ft[1] 1100 ft. -Distance between front of garage& property line abutting a public or - - private street. Maximum Height 45 ft 6.5 ft.` Maximum Site Coverage [2] 75% -30% Minimum Landscape Requirement 25% --70% [1]no setback shall be required except 50 feet shall be required where the zone abuts a residential zone. [2]includes all buildings and impervious area Although the tower height will be 100',it is not subject to the underlying zone height limits. The equipment will measure 6.5'in height. The site is comprised of various sanitary sewer treatment facilities and operations buildings. A large balance of the site is unimproved. The proposed wireless telecommunication facility will be located between existing structures on the site in an underutilized open area. The proposal will add a very small amount of additional impervious area to the site, approximately 300 square feet. The setbacks to the wireless communication facility exceed those of the underlying zone, with the shortest distance to the property line being 160 feet. FINDING: Based on the analysis above, the underlying zone's development criteria have been satisfied. B. APPLICABLE DEVELOPMENT CODE STANDARDS The Site Development Review approval standards require that a development proposal be found to be consistent with the various standards of the Community Development Code. Access, Egress and Circulation (18.705): Access plan: No building or other permit shall be issued until scaled plans are presented and approved as provided by this chapter that show how access, egress and circulation requirements are to be fulfilled. The applicant shall submit a site plan. The Director shall provide the applicant with detailed information about this submission requirement. The applicant has provided scgled plans showing access, egress and circulation for the proposed monopole from SW 85 Avenue, which is a public street. Joint access: Owners of two or more uses, structures, or parcels of land may agree to utilize jointly the same access and egress when the combined access and egress of both uses, structures, or parcels of land satisfies the combined requirements as designated in this title, provided: Satisfactory legal evidence shall be presented in the form of deeds, easements, leases or contracts to establish the joint use; and copies of the deeds, easements, leases or contracts are placed on permanent file with the City. The applicant has proposed to utilize the existing site access and jointly share the driveway to the wireless communication facility site. An access easement will jointly required. NOTICE OF TYPE II DECISION SDR2002-00010/CINGULAR COMMUNICATIONS MONOPOLE PAGE 4 OF 20 FINDING: The applicant has not submitted an access easement to establish the joint access. Public street access: All vehicular access and egress as required in Sections 18.705.030H and 18.705.0301 shall connect directly with a public or private street approved by the City for public use and shall be maintained at the required standards on a continuous basis. The subject site is accessible from SW 85th Avenue, an improved public street. This street does not presently meet the City's standards for public streets. However, a prior approval related to the improvements of the Clean Water Services requires that the street be brought up to standards in terms of width and level of improvements. This approval is presently under construction and the street improvement is imminent. However, to assure that the subject application will meet this standard, a condition will be imposed related to improvement of this street. FINDING: The subject site does not presently connect with a public street meeting the City's standards. Curb cuts: Curb cuts shall be in accordance with Section 18.810.030N: Concrete curbs, curb cuts, wheelchair, bicycle ramps and driveway approaches shall be constructed in accordance with standards specified in this chapter and Section 15.04.080: Concrete curbs and driveway approaches are required; except where no sidewalk is planned, an asphalt approach may be constructed with City Engineer approval and Asphalt and concrete driveway approaches to the property line shall be built to City configuration standards. The applicant proposes to utilize the existing curb cut and driveway apron, which conform to City standards. Walkways: On-site pedestrian walkways shall comply with the following standards: Walkways shall extend from the ground floor entrances or from the ground floor landing of stairs, ramps, or elevators of all commercial, institutional, and industrial uses, to the streets which provide the required access and egress. Walkways shall provide convenient connections between buildings in multi-building commercial, institutional, and industrial complexes. Unless impractical, walkways shall be constructed between new and existing developments and neighboring developments; The proposed facility is a non-inhabited structure and will be fenced off separately from the rest of the site for security purposes. There is a proposed walkway that will connect with the existing and planned system of walkway§, within the treatment facility. These walkways will connect to the public sidewalk on SW 85 Avenue to provide adequate pedestrian access to the site. Wherever required walkways cross vehicle access driveways or parking lots, such crossings shall be designed and located for pedestrian safety. Required walkways shall be physically separated from motor vehicle traffic and parking by either a minimum 6-inch vertical separation (curbed) or a minimum 3-foot horizontal separation, except that pedestrian crossings of traffic aisles are permitted for distances no greater than 36 feet if appropriate landscaping, pavement markings, or contrasting pavement materials are used. Walkways shall be a minimum of four feet in width, exclusive of vehicle overhangs and obstructions such as mailboxes, benches, bicycle racks, and sign posts, and shall be in compliance with ADA standards; The walkways on the site were reviewed during the prior Site Development Review cases and found to be in compliance with this standard. The newly proposed walkway will be 4 feet wide and 15 feet long. The walkway will terminate at a locked security gate. NOTICE OF TYPE II DECISION SDR2002-00010/CINGULAR COMMUNICATIONS MONOPOLE PAGE 5 OF 20 Required walkways shall be paved with hard surfaced materials such as concrete, asphalt, stone, brick, etc. Walkways may be required to be lighted and/or signed as needed for safety purposes. Soft-surfaced public use pathways may be provided only if such pathways are provided in addition to required pathways. The proposed walkway will be constructed of concrete, therefore, this standard is met. Minimum Access Requirements for Commercial and Industrial Use: Section 18.705.030.1 rovides the minimum access requirements for commercial and industrial uses: Table 18.705.3 indicates that the required access width for developments with 0-99 parking spaces is one 30-foot accesses with 24 feet of pavement. Vehicular access shall be provided to commercial or industrial uses, and shall be located within 50 feet of the primary ground floor entrances; additional requirements for truck traffic may be placed as conditions of site development review. The site has its primary access from SW 85th Avenue and is greater than 30 feet wide with more than 24 feet of pavement. The proposed development will not affect any change to the existing primary access point, which is in conformance with the code. A secondary access is also available to the site. This access also meets the minimum dimensional standards. One-way vehicular access points: Where a proposed parking facility indicates only one-way traffic flow on the site, it shall be accommodated by a specific driveway serving the facility; the entrance drive shall be situated closest to oncoming traffic and the exit drive shall be situated farthest from oncoming traffic. The existing primary access accommodates two-way traffic. The Director has the authority to restrict access when the need to do so is dictated by one or more of the following conditions: To provide for increased traffic movement on congested streets and to eliminate turning movement problems, the Director may restrict the location of driveways on streets and require the location of driveways be placed on adjacent streets, upon the finding that the proposed access would: • Cause or increase existing hazardous traffic conditions; or • Provide inadequate access for emergency vehicles; or • Cause hazardous conditions to exist which would constitute a clear and present danger to the public health, safety, and general welfare. To eliminate the need to use public streets for movements between commercial or industrial properties, parking areas shall be designed to connect with parking areas on adjacent properties unless not feasible. The Director shall require access easements between properties where necessary to provide for parking area connections; To facilitate pedestrian and bicycle traffic, access and parking area plans shall provide efficient sidewalk and/or pathway connections, as feasible, between neighboring developments or land uses; The existing access meets present City standards and affords good visibility in both directions of SW 85 Avenue. No parking area is being developed as part of this application; therefore connections to other adjacent parking areas are irrelevant. Similarly, efficient sidewalk or pathway connections between neighboring developments is beyond the scope of this proposal, since the overall site was reviewed for these connections as part of a prior land use review and no changes to parking areas or accesses are proposed. FINDING: Based on the analysis above, the Access, Egress and Circulation standards have not been fully met, however by imposing the following conditions, these standards will be satisfied. NOTICE OF TYPE II DECISION SDR2002-00010/CINGULAR COMMUNICATIONS MONOPOLE PAGE 6 OF 20 CONDITIONS: . The applicant/ owner shall provide satisfactory legal evidence, in the form of deeds, easements, leases or contracts to establish the joint access. . The owner is required to construct street improvements to SW 85th Avenue as part of a prior land use approval. The applicant shall provide a future improvements guarantee for the frontage of SW 85 prior to issuance of a site permit to assure that the street will be improved. Environmental Performance Standards (18.725) The purpose of these provisions is to apply the federal and state environmental laws, rules and regulations to development within the City of Tigard. These requirements are intended to prevent or mitigate for adverse environmental impacts to offsite properties from noise, visible emissions, vibration, odors, insects and rodents, and glare and heat. The proposed wireless communication facility will have the mechanical equipment housed within the adjacent storage unit, limiting potential noise. The use does not generate trash, sewage, wastewater, vibration, odors, or visible emissions. As there will be no trash accumulation, there should be no harboring of insects or rodents. The dull galvanized color will minimize glare. FINDING: Based on the analysis above, and continued obligation of the property owner to adhere to these provisions, this standard is met. Landscaping and Screening (18.745): Street Trees: Section 18.745.040 states that all development projects fronting on a public street or a private drive more than 100 feet in length shall be required to plant street trees in accordance with Section 18.745.040.0 Section 18.745.040.0 requires that street trees be spaced between 20 and 40 feet apart depending on the size classification of the tree at maturity (small, medium or large). This development fronts a public street and is, therefore, required to have street trees. The site was reviewed through an earlier Site Development Review and was required to plant street trees as part of the required street improvements. The applicant has been conditioned previously in this decision to provide a future improvements guarantee, which will also cover the planting of street trees. Buffering and Screening: Section 18.745.050 states that buffering, but not screening is required between abutting uses that are of a different type when the uses are separated by a street. No buffer or screening is required between similar uses. The proposed use is located centrally within the industrial property. As such, no buffering and screening is required as the parent parcel and the applicant's proposed use are similar. Buffering exists between the treatment plant site and the residential properties to the north and south and from the school to the east. Screening: Special Provisions: Section 18.745.050.E requires the screening of parking and loading areas. Landscaped parking areas shall include special design features which effectively screen the parking lot areas from view. Planting materials to be installed should achieve a relative balance between low lying and vertical shrubbery and trees. Trees shall be planted in landscaped islands in all parking areas, and shall be equally distributed on the basis of one (1) tree for each seven (7) parking spaces in order to provide a canopy effect. The minimum dimension on the landscape islands shall be three (3) feet wide and the landscaping shall be protected from vehicular damage by some form of wheel guard or curb. NOTICE OF TYPE II DECISION SDR2002-00010/CINGULAR COMMUNICATIONS MONOPOLE PAGE 7 OF 20 The proposed use does not require additional parking. The existing parking, area is screened by a low berm. Since no changes to the parking area are proposed or required, no additional screening will be required. Screening Of Service Facilities. Except for one-family and two-family dwellings, any refuse container or disposal area and service facilities such as gas meters and air conditioners which would otherwise be visible from a public street, customer or resident parking area, any public facility or any residential area shall be screened from view by placement of a solid wood fence or masonry wall between five and eight feet in height. All refuse materials shall be contained within the screened area; Service facilities are not needed for the proposed use, and have not been proposed. FINDING: Based on the analysis above, the landscaping and screening standards of this section have been met. Mixed Solid Waste and Recyclables Storage (18.755): Chapter 18.755 requires that new construction incorporates functional and adequate space for on-site storage and efficient collection of mixed solid waste and source separated Recyclables prior to pick-up and removal by haulers. The applicant must choose one (1) of the following four (4) methods to demonstrate compliance: Minimum Standard, Waste Assessment, Comprehensive Recycling Plan, or Franchised Hauler Review and Sign-Off. The applicant will have to submit evidence or a plan which indicates compliance with this section. Regardless of which method chosen, the applicant will have to submit a written sign-off from the franchise hauler regarding the facility location and compatibility. No mixed solid waste collection or recyclables storage is needed for this use. No changes to the site's existing refuse collection area are proposed. Location Standards. To encourage its use, the storage area for source-separated recyclable shall be co- located with the storage area for residual mixed solid waste; Indoor and outdoor storage areas shall comply with Uniform Building and Fire Code requirements; Storage area space requirements can be satisfied with a single location or multiple locations, and can combine both interior and exterior locations; Exterior storage areas can be located within interior side yard or rear yard areas. Exterior storage areas shall not be located within a required front yard setback or in a yard adjacent to a public or private street; Exterior storage areas shall be located in central and visible locations on a site to enhance security for users; Exterior storage areas can be located in a parking.area if the proposed use provides at least the minimum number of parking spaces required for the use after deducting the area used for story e. Storage areas shall be appropriately screened according to the provisions in 18.755.050 C, design standards; The storage area shall be accessible for collection vehicles and located so that the storage area will not obstruct pedestrian or vehicle traffic movement on the site or on public streets adjacent to the site. No mixed solid waste collection or recyclables storage is needed for this use. Therefore, this standard is met. Design Standards. The dimensions of the storage area shall accommodate containers consistent with current methods of local collection; Storage containers shall meet Uniform Fire Code standards and be made and covered with waterproof materials or situated in a covered area; Exterior storage areas shall be enclosed by a sight-obscuring fence wall, or hedge at least six feet in height. Gate openings which allow access to users and haulers shall be provided. Gate openings for haulers shall be a minimum of 10 feet wide and shall be capable of being secured in a closed and open position; Storage area(s) and containers shall be clearly labeled to indicate the type of materials accepted. NOTICE OF TYPE II DECISION SDR2002-00010/CINGULAR COMMUNICATIONS MONOPOLE PAGE 8 OF 20 No mixed solid waste collection or recyclables storage is needed for this use. Therefore, this standard is met. FINDING: Based on the analysis above, the Mixed Solid Waste & Recyclables Storage Standards have been met. Off-Street Parking and Loading (18.765): Location of vehicle parking: Off-street arking spaces for single-family and duplex dwellings and single-family attached dwellings shall be located on the same lot with the dwellings. Off-street parking lots for uses not listed above shall be located not further than 200 feet from the building or use that they are required to serve, measured in a straight line from the building with the following exceptions: a) commercial and industrial uses which require more than 40 parking spaces may provide for the spaces in excess of the required first 40 spaces up to a distance of 300 feet from the primary site; The 40 parking spaces which remain on the primary site must be available for users in the following order of priority: 1) Disabled-accessible spaces; 2) Short-term spaces; 3) Long-term preferential carpool and vanpool spaces; 4) Long-term spaces. No parking is required for the proposed use. Therefore, this standard is met. Joint Parking: Owners of two or more uses, structures or parcels of land may agree to utilize jointly the same parking and loading spaces when the peak hours of operation do not overlay, subject to the following: 1) The size of the joint parking facility shall be at least as large as the number of vehicle parking spaces required by the larger(est) use per Section 18.765.070; 2) Satisfactory legal evidence shall be presented to the Director in the form of deeds, leases or contracts to establish the joint use; 3) If a joint use arrangement is subsequently terminated, or if the uses change, the requirements of this title thereafter apply to each separately. Joint parking is not proposed with this application. Therefore, this standard does not apply. Parking in Mixed-Use Projects: In mixed-use projects, the required minimum vehicle parking shall be determined using the following formula. 1) Primary use, i.e., that with the largest proportion of total floor area within the development, at 100% of the minimum vehicle parking required for that use in Section 18.765.060; 2) Secondary use, i.e., that with the second largest percentage of total floor area within the develo ment, at 90% of the vehicle parking required for that use in Section 18.765.060; 3 Subsequent use or uses, at 80% of the vehicle parking required for that use(s) in ection 18.765.060; 4) The maximum parking allowance shall be 150% of the total minimum parking as calculated in D.1.-3. above. The project is not considered a mixed-use project. Therefore, this standard does not apply. Visitor Parking in Multi-Family Residential Developments: Multi-dwelling units with more than 10 required parking spaces shall provide an additional 15% of vehicle parking spaces above the minimum required for the use of guests of residents of the complex. These spaces shall be centrally located or distributed throughout the development. Required bicycle parking facilities shall also be centrally located within or evenly distributed throughout the development. This project does not involve a residential use. Therefore, this standard does not apply. Preferential Long-Term CarpoolNanpool Parking: Parking lots providing in excess of 20 long-term parking spaces shall provide preferential long-term carpool and vanpool parking for employees, students and other regular visitors to the site. At least 5% of total long-term parking spaces shall be reserved for carpool/vanpool use. Preferential parking for carpools/vanpools shall be closer to the main entrances of the building than any other employee or student parking except parking spaces designated for use by the disabled. Preferential NOTICE OF TYPE II DECISION SDR2002-00010/CINGULAR COMMUNICATIONS MONOPOLE PAGE 9 OF 20 carpool/vanpool spaces shall be full-sized per requirements in Section 18.765.040N and shall be clearly designated for use only by carpools and vanpools between 7:00 AM and 5:30 PM Monday through Friday. No parking is required for the proposed use. Therefore, no carpool/vanpool stalls are required. Disabled-Accessible Parking: All parking areas shall be provided with the required number of parking spaces for disabled persons as specified by the State of Oregon Uniform Building Code and federal standards. Such parking spaces shall be sized, signed and marked as required by these regulations. No parking is required for the proposed use. The facility is not intended for public access and is, therefore, exempt from ADA accessibility requirements. Therefore, this standard has been met. Access Drives: With regard to access to public streets from off-street parking: access drives from the street to off-street parking or loading areas shall be designed and constructed to facilitate the flow of traffic and provide maximum safety for pedestrian and vehicular traffic on the site; the number and size of access drives shall be in accordance with the requirements of Chapter, 18.705, Access, Egress and Circulation; access drives shall be clearly and permanently marked and defined through use of rails, fences, walls or other barriers or markers on frontage not occupied by service drives; access drives shall have a minimum vision clearance in accordance with Chapter 18.795, Visual Clearance; access drives shall be improved with an asphalt or concrete surface; and excluding single-family and duplex residences, except as provided by Subsection 18.810.030.P, groups of two or more parking spaces shall be served by a service drive so that no backing movements or other maneuvering within a street or other public right-of-way will be required. No changes to the primary access are proposed. Pedestrian Access: Pedestrian access through parking lots shall be provided in accordance with Section 18.705.030.F. Where a parking area or other vehicle area has a drop-off grade separation, the property owner shall install a wall, railing, or other barrier which will prevent a slow-moving vehicle or driverless vehicle from escaping such area and which will prevent pedestrians from walking over drop-off edges. There are no changes proposed to the parking and there are no pedestrian destinations that would necessitate pedestrian access from the parking lot. Parking Lot Striping: Except for single-family and duplex residences, any area intended to be used to meet the off-street parking requirements as contained in this Chapter shall have all parking spaces clearly marked; and all interior drives and access aisles shall be clearly marked and signed to show direction of flow and maintain vehicular and pedestrian safety . There are no changes proposed to the parking area and no parking is required for the proposed use. Therefore, this standard has been met. Wheel Stops: Parking spaces along the boundaries of a parking lot or adjacent to interior landscaped areas or sidewalks shall be provided with a wheel stop at least four inches high located three feet back from the front of the iparking stall. The front three feet of the parking stall may be concrete, asphalt or low lying landscape material that does not exceed the height of the wheel stop. This area cannot be calculated to meet landscaping or sidewalk requirements. NOTICE OF TYPE II DECISION SDR2002-00010/CINGULAR COMMUNICATIONS MONOPOLE PAGE 10 OF 20 There are no changes proposed to the parking area and no parking is required for the proposed use. Therefore, this standard has been met. Space and Aisle Dimensions: Section 18.765.040.N states that: "except as modified for angled parking in Figures 18.765.1 and 18.765.2 the minimum dimensions for parking spaces are: 8.5 feet x 18.5 feet for a standard space and 7.5 feet x 16.5 feet for a compact space; aisles accommodating two direction traffic, or allowing access from both ends, shall be 24 feet in width. There are no changes proposed to the parking area and no parking is required for the proposed use. Therefore, this standard has been met. Bicycle Parking Location and Access: Section 18.765.050 states bicycle parking areas shall be provided at locations within 50 feet of primary entrances to structures; bicycle parking areas shall not be located within parking aisles, landscape areas or pedestrian ways; outdoor bicycle parking shall be visible from on-site buildings and/or the street. When the bicycle parking area is not visible from the street, directional signs shall be used to locate the parking area; and bicycle parking may be located inside a building on a floor which has an outdoor entrance open for use and floor location which does not require the bicyclist to use stairs to gain access to the space. Exceptions may be made to the latter requirement for parking on upper stories within a multi-story residential building. There are no changes proposed to the parking area and no bicycle parking is required for the proposed use. Therefore, this standard has been met. Bicycle Parking Design Requirements: Section 18.765.050.C. The following design requirements apply to the installation of bicycle racks: The racks required for required bicycle parking spaces shall ensure that bicycles may be securely locked to them without undue inconvenience. Provision of bicycle lockers for long-term (employee) parking is encouraged but not required; bicycle racks must be securely anchored to the ground, wall or other structure; bicycle parking spaces shall be at least 21/2 feet by six feet long, and, when covered, with a vertical clearance of seven feet. An access aisle of at least five feet wide shall be provided and maintained beside or between each row of bicycle parking; each required bicycle parking space must be accessible without moving another bicycle; required bicycle parking spaces may not be rented or leased except where required motor vehicle parking is rented or leased. At-cost or deposit fees for bicycle parking are exempt from this requirement; and areas set aside for required bicycle parking must be clearly reserved for bicycle parking only. Outdoor bicycle parking facilities shall be surfaced with a hard surfaced material, i.e., pavers, asphalt, concrete or similar material. This surface must be designed to remain well drained. There are no changes proposed to the parking area and no bicycle parking is required for the proposed use. Therefore, this standard has been met. Minimum Bicycle Parking Requirements: The total number of required bicycle parking spaces for each use is specified in Table 18.765.2 in Section 18.765.070.H. In no case shall there be less than two bicycle parking spaces. As discussed above, according to Table 18.765.2 of the Tigard Development Code, the minimum bicycle-parking requirement for a Wireless Communication Facility is zero spaces. Minimum Off-Street Parking: Section 18.765.070.H states that the minimum and maximum parking shall be as required in Table 18.765.2. Table 18.765.2 states that the minimum parking for a Wireless Communication Facility is zero spaces. Therefore, this standard is satisfied. NOTICE OF TYPE II DECISION SDR2002-00010/CINGULAR COMMUNICATIONS MONOPOLE PAGE 11 OF 20 Off-Street Loading Spaces: Commercial, industrial and institutional buildings or structures to be built or altered which receive and distribute material or merchandise by truck shall provide and maintain off-street loading and maneuvering space as follows: A minimum of one loading space is required for buildings with 10,000 gross square feet or more; A minimum of two loading spaces for buildings with 40,000 gross square feet or more. Loading spaces are provided for the existing use. The proposed monopole will not necessitate a loading space. FINDING: Based on the above analysis, the off-street parking and loading standards have been met. Signs (18.780): Chapter 18.780.130.D lists the type of allowable signs and sign area permitted in the I-P Zoning District. The proposed plans do not call for any signage. Based on this, this standard is met. FINDING: This standard is met, since the applicant has not proposed any signs. Tree Removal (18.790): Section 18.790.030 requires that a tree plan for the planting, removal and protection of trees prepared by a certified arborist shall be provided with a site development review application. The tree plan shall include identification of all existing trees, identification of a program to save existing trees or mitigate tree removal over 12 inches in caliper, which trees are to be removed, protection program defining standards and methods that will be used by the applicant to protect trees during and after construction. The applicant's plans do not propose any tree removal, and there are no trees in the immediate vicinity that would be impacted by the construction of the monopole. Therefore no specific protection measures will be necessary. FINDING: There are no trees impacted by this proposal, therefore this standard is met. Visual Clearance Areas (18.795): Chapter 18.795 requires that a clear vision area shall be maintained on the corners of all property adjacent to intersecting right-of-ways or the intersection of a public street and a private driveway. A clear vision area shall-contain no vehicle, hedge planting, fence, wall structure, or temporary or permanent obstruction exceeding three (3 feet in height. The code provides that obstructions that may be located in this area shall be visually clear between three (3) and eight (8) feet in height (8) (trees may be placed within this area provided that all branches below eight (8) feet are removed). A visual clearance area is the triangular area formed by measuring a 30-foot distance along the street right- of-way and the driveway, and then connecting these two (2), 30-foot distance points with a straight line. The primary access to this property is from SW 85th Avenue. The vision clearance areas are shown on the applicant's site plan. Based on a site visual investigation, staff confirms that there are no visual obstacles at the site's access entry. FINDING: The Visual Clearance Standards have been met. Wireless Communication Facilities (18.798): Chapter 18.798 allows wireless communication facilities in commercial zones, the I-P zone and public rights of way, subject to a Site Development Review process, provided they satisfy the specific criteria outlined in this chapter and are setback from any offsite residence a distance equal to the height of the tower. NOTICE OF TYPE II DECISION SDR2002-00010/CINGULAR COMMUNICATIONS MONOPOLE PAGE 12 OF 20 Aesthetic: New towers shall maintain a non-reflective gray finish or, if required by the FAA, be painted pursuant to the FAA's requirements; if collocation on an existin tower is requested the design of any antenna(s), accessory structures or equipment shall, to the extent possible, use materials, colors and textures that will match the existing tower or non-tower structure to which the equipment of the collocating provider is being attached; if collocation on an existing non-tower structure is requested, the antenna(s) and supporting electrical and mechanical equipment shall be a neutral color that is the same as the color as the supporting structure so as to make the antenna(s) and related equipment as visually unobtrusive as possible. The proposed facility is not a collocation. The applicant has not indicated what color the tower will be, nor has the applicant provided information from FAA to determine whether additional flight safety marking will be required. Setbacks: Towers designed to collapse within themselves shall be set back in accordance with the setbacks contained in the base zone; towers not designed to collapse within themselves shall be set back from the property line by a distance equal to the height of the tower. The applicant has proposed to locate the 100-foot tower no closer than 250 feet to any property line in compliance with this requirement. Tower spacing: No new tower shall be allowed within 500 feet of an existing tower. The nearest existing tower is approximately 675 feet to the west. Tower height: No tower shall exceed 100 feet for a single user or 125 feet for multiple users; The proposed tower is for a single user, and will be 100 feet. The antennae will be mounted at the top of the tower and will extend another 4 feet above the tower. Lighting: No lighting shall be permitted on a tower except as required by the FAA; No lighting has been proposed on the tower. Fencing and security: For security purposes, towers and ancillary facilities shall be enclosed by a minimum six-foot fence; The proposed facility will be enclosed by a six-foot chain link fence, the equipment will be wholly enclosed within the existing storage units. Landscaping and screening: Landscaping shall be placed outside the fence and shall consist of evergreen shrubs which reach six feet in height and 95% opacity within three years of planting; when adjacent to or within residentially-zoned property, free- standing towers and accessory equipment facilities shall be screened by the planting of a minimum of four evergreen trees at least 15 feet in height at the time of planting. The proposed tower is not within a residential zone. The applicant has proposed 6 Douglas Fir trees and 24 Photinia plants to surround the fence enclosure. Staff questions whether the 5-foot on center spacing specified for the Photinia will accomplish the 95% opacity standard. Staff, therefore, recommends that the applicant revise the landscape plan to achieve this standard, or certify that the proposed landscaping will achieve the standard. Noise: Noise-generating equipment shall be sound-buffered by means of baffling, barriers or other suitable means to reduce the sound level measured at the property line to 50 dBA (day)/40 dBA (night) when adjacent to a noise-sensitive land use and 75 dBA (day)/60 dBA (night) when adjacent to other uses. NOTICE OF TYPE II DECISION SDR2002-00010/CINGULAR COMMUNICATIONS MONOPOLE PAGE 13 OF 20 The mechanical equipment will be housed and completely enclosed within metal cabinets. The only external sounds anticipated would be from the air conditioning unit. The property is adjacent to residential property, and a school; however, the distance between the proposed use and these noise sensitive uses is so vast, no impact is expected. Nevertheless, the applicant shall note that a maximum 50 dBA (day)/40 dBA (night) noise limit as measured from the property line is required. If these levels are exceeded, a civil citation could result. FINDING: Based on the analysis above, staff cannot determine whether the specific requirements for wireless facilities have been satisfied. However, with the imposition of the following conditions, these standards can be met. CONDITIONS: Unless the applicant has been otherwise directed by the FAA, the color of the monopole shall be a non-reflective galvanized gray finish. The landscape plan shall be revised to ensure that the evergreen shrubs will reach 6 feet in height and 95% opacity within three years, and form a continuous hedge. Alternately, if the applicant believes that the proposed landscape plan will satisfy this standard, then the applicant shall certify that the standard will be met. C. SPECIFIC SITE DEVELOPMENT REVIEW APPROVAL STANDARDS Section 18.360.090(A)(2) through 18.360.090(A)(15) provides additional Site Development Review approval standards not necessarily covered by the provisions of the previously listed sections. These additional standards are addressed immediately below with the following exceptions: The proposal contains no elements related to the provisions of the following and are, therefore, found to be inapplicable as approval standards: 18.360.090.3 (Exterior Elevations); 18.360.090.5 (Privacy and Noise: Multi-family or Group Living Uses); 18.360.090.6 (Private Outdoor Areas: Multi-family Use); 18.360.090.7 (Shared Outdoor Recreation Areas: Multi-family Use); 18.360.090.8 (100-year floodplain); and 18.360.090.9 (Demarcation of Spaces). The following sections were discussed previously in this decision and, therefore, will not be addressed in this section: 18.360.090.4 (Buffering, Screening and Compatibility Between Adjoining Uses); 18.360.090.13 Parking); 18.360.090.14 (Landscaping); 18.360.090.15 (Drainage); and 18.360.090.14 (Provisions for the Disabled). Relationship to the Natural and Physical Environment: Buildings shall be: located to preserve existing trees, topography and natural drainage where possible based upon existing site conditions; located in areas not subject to ground slumping or sliding; located to provide adequate distance between adjoining buildings for adequate light, air circulation, and fire-fighting; and oriented with consideration for sun and wind. Trees shall be preserved to the extent possible. Replacement of trees is subject to the requirements of Chapter 18.790, Tree Removal. The proposed wireless communication facility site will be located on a small landscape island between the access roads to various treatment structures. A small amount of landscaping will be displaced, however, the facility itself will be screened by landscape materials. No tree removal, land grading, or drainage alteration is required to accommodate the proposed development. Suitable separation is provided between the proposed equipment shelter and any other buildings on or off site, which is adequate for light and air circulation. NOTICE OF TYPE II DECISION SDR2002-000101CINGULAR COMMUNICATIONS MONOPOLE PAGE 14 OF 20 Crime Prevention and Safety: • Windows shall be located so that areas vulnerable to crime can be surveyed by the occupants; • Interior laundry and service areas shall be located in a way that they can be observed by others; • Mail boxes shall be located in lighted areas having vehicular or pedestrian traffic; • The exterior lighting levels shall be selected and the angles shall be oriented towards areas vulnerable to crime; and • Light fixtures shall be provided in areas having heavy pedestrian or vehicular traffic and in potentially dangerous areas such as parking lots, stairs, ramps and abrupt grade changes. Fixtures shall be placed at a height so that light patterns overlap at a height of seven feet, which is sufficient to illuminate a person. The un-staffed status of the site necessitates added security. Chain link fencing is proposed to surround the monopole. Radio cabinets will be placed inside the fenced enclosure. There is existing security lighting for the wastewater treatment facility. Therefore, this criterion has been met. Public Transit: Provisions within the plan shall be included to provide for transit if the development proposal is adjacent to existing or proposed transit route; the requirements for transit facilities shall be based on: the location of other transit facilities in the area; and the size and type of the proposal. The following facilities may be required after City and Tri-Met review: bus stop shelters; turnouts for buses; and connecting paths to the shelters. Thg site has frontage on SW 85th Avenue. While there is transit service to the corner of SW 851 Avenue and Durham Road, the proposed development is un-staffed and, therefore, does not generate potential ridership. Therefore, this standard does not apply. Provisions of the Underlying Zone: All of the provisions and regulations of the underlying zone shall apply unless modified by other sections or this title, e.g., Planned Developments, Chapter 18.350; or a variance or adjustment granted under Chapter 18.370. Dimensional Requirements: Provisions of the (I-P) Industrial Park Zoning District have been addressed earlier in this decision under Section 18.530.040. FINDING: Based on the analysis above, the specific standards of the Site Development Review Section have been met. D. Street And Utility Improvements Standards (Section 18.810): Chapter 18.810 provides construction standards for the implementation of public and private facilities and utilities such as streets, sewers, and drainage. The applicable standards are addressed below: Streets: Improvements: Section 18.810.030.A.1 states that streets within a development and streets adjacent shall be improved in accordance with the TDC standards. Section 18.810.030.A.2 states that any new street or additional street width planned as a portion of an existing street shall be dedicated and improved in accordance with the TDC. NOTICE OF TYPE II DECISION SDR2002-00010/CINGULAR COMMUNICATIONS MONOPOLE PAGE 15 OF 20 This site lies adjacent to SW 85th Avenue, which is classified as a Planned Arterial in the City of Tigard Transportation System Plan. At present, there is approximately 30 feet of total ROW, according to the most recent tax assessor's map. This right of way is inadequate to meet the TSP planned right-of-way width of 96 feet. However, the proposed use generates a very small amount of additional traffic (approximately 2 trips per month). Requiring additional right of way for the proposed use would not be proportionate to the level of anticipated impact. Sidewalks: Section 18.810.070.A requires that sidewalks be constructed to meet City design standards and be located on both sides of arterial, collector and local residential streets. There are existing sidewalks along the site's frontage. Sanitary Sewers: Sewers Required: Section 18.810.090.A requires that sanitary sewer be installed to serve each new development and to connect developments to existing mains in accordance with the provisions set forth in Design and Construction Standards for Sanitary and Surface Water Management (as adopted by Clean Water Services in 1996 and including any future revisions or amendments) and the adopted policies of the comprehensive plan. Over-sizing: Section 18.810.090.0 states that proposed sewer systems shall include consideration of additional development within the area as projected by the Comprehensive Plan. There is an existing 8-inch public sewer main located in SW 85th Avenue and a 60-inch line that feed the sewer treatment plant. The proposed use does not require sewer service, so no additional public sewer line work is necessary for this development. Storm Drainage: General Provisions: Section 18.810.100.A states requires developers to make adequate provisions for storm water and flood water runoff. Accommodation of Upstream Drainage: Section 18.810.100.0 states that a culvert or other drainage facility shall be large enough to accommodate potential runoff from its entire upstream drainage area, whether inside or outside the development. The City Engineer shall approve the necessary size of the facility, based on the provisions of Design and Construction Standards for Sanitary and Surface Water Management (as adopted by Clean Water Services in 2000 and including any future revisions or amendments). The topography of this is very flat and is served by an internal system of surface drains. These drains discharge into the storm system in SW 85' Avenue. The applicant's onsite storm drainage plan will collect any surface water that would impact this site and convey it to the public system in SW 85 Avenue. Effect on Downstream Drainage: Section 18.810.100.D states that where it is anticipated by the City Engineer that the additional runoff resulting from the development will overload an existing drainage facility, the Director and Engineer shall withhold approval of the development until provisions have been made for improvement of the potential condition or until provisions have been made for storage of additional runoff caused by the development in accordance with the Design and Construction Standards for Sanitary and Surface Water Management (as adopted by Clean Water Services in 2000 and including any future revisions or amendments). CWS design standards provide that if the impervious area of a site is not increased over 5,000 square feet, then onsite detention is not required. There is a net increase of approximately 1,500 square feet of impervious area resulting from this proposal. Therefore, on-site detention is not required for this project. NOTICE OF TYPE II DECISION SDR2002-00010/CINGULAR COMMUNICATIONS MONOPOLE PAGE 16 OF 20 Bikeways and Pedestrian Pathways: Bikeway Extension: Section 18.810.110.A states that developments adjoining proposed bikeways identified on the City's adopted pedestrian/bikeway plan shall include provisions for the future extension of such bikeways through the dedication of easements or right-of-way. No bikeways are associated with this project. Therefore, this criterion does not apply. Cost of Construction: Section 18.810.110.B states that development permits issued for planned unit developments, conditional use permits, subdivisions, and other developments which will principally benefit from such bikeways shall be conditioned to include the cost or construction of bikeway improvements. No bikeways are associated with this project. Therefore, this criterion does not apply. Minimum Width: Section 18.810.110.0 states that the minimum width for bikeways within the roadway is five feet per bicycle travel lane. Minimum width for two-way bikeways separated from the road is eight feet. No bikeways are associated with this project. Therefore, this criterion does not apply. Utilities: Section 18.810.120 states that all utility lines, but not limited to those required for electric, communication, lighting and cable television services and related facilities shall be placed underground, except for surface mounted transformers, surface mounted connection boxes and meter cabinets which may be placed above ground, temporary utility service facilities during construction, high capacity electric lines operating at 50,000 volts or above, and: • The developer shall make all necessary arrangements with the serving utility to provide the underground services; • The City reserves the right to approve location of all surface mounted facilities; • All underground utilities, including sanitary sewers and storm drains installed in streets by the developer, shall be constructed prior to the surfacing of the streets; and • Stubs for service connections shall be long enough to avoid disturbing the street improvements when service connections are made. Exception to Under-Grounding Requirement: Section 18.810.120.0 states that a developer shall pay a fee in-lieu of under-grounding costs when the development is proposed to take place on a street where existing utilities which are not underground will serve the development and the approval authority determines that the cost and technical difficulty of under-grounding the utilities outweighs the benefit of under- grounding in conjunction with the development. The determination shall be on a case- by-case basis. The most common, but not the only, such situation is a short frontage development for which under-grounding would result in the placement of additional poles, rather than the removal of above-ground utilities facilities. An applicant for a development which is served by utilities which are not underground and which are located across a public right-of-way from the applicant's property shall pay a fee in-lieu of under-grounding. There are no existing overhead utility lines along SW 85th Avenue. CWS was required to underground these lines as part of their prior approval. No additional fee shall be assessed. All service utilities to the development shall be installed underground however. ADDITIONAL CITY AND/OR AGENCY CONCERNS WITH STREET AND UTILITY IMPROVEMENT STANDARDS: Public Water System: This site is located in the Tigard Water District service area. NOTICE OF TYPE II DECISION SDR2002-00010/CINGULAR COMMUNICATIONS MONOPOLE PAGE 17 OF 20 Storm Water Quality: The City has agreed to enforce Surface Water Management (SWM) regulations established by Clean Water Services (CWS) Design and Construction Standards (adopted by Resolution and Order No. 00-7) which require the construction of on-site water quality facilities. The facilities shall be designed to remove 65 percent of the phosphorus contained in 100 percent of the storm water runoff generated from newly created impervious surfaces. In addition, a maintenance plan shall be submitted indicating the frequency and method to be used in keeping the facility maintained through the year. The small amount of increased impervious area (approximately 1,500 square feet) does not necessitate a water quality facility, and creation of such a facility may be impractical within the confines of this landscape island. As such, a payment in lieu of providing a water quality facility may be imposed. Grading and Erosion Control: CWS less n and Construction Standards also regulate erosion control to reduce the amount of-sediment and other pollutants reaching the public storm and surface water system resulting from development, construction, grading, excavating, clearing, and any other activity which accelerates erosion. Per CWS regulations, the applicant is required to submit an erosion control plan for City review and approval prior to issuance of City permits. The Federal Clean Water Act requires that a National Pollutant Discharge Elimination System (NPDES) erosion control permit be issued for any development that will disturb five or more acres of land. While the subject property is greater than 5 acres, the area of disturbance is limited to approximately 1200 square feet. Since this disturbed area is less than five acres, the developer will not be required to obtain an NPDES ermit from the City prior to construction. This permit will be issued along with the site and/or building permit. A grading and erosion control plan must be submitted to the Building Division during the site permit review phase. The Building Division will review the onsite grading plan during the site permit review. A NPDES permit is not required, as the disturbance area is less than five acres in size. FINDING: Based on the above analysis, the Agency Concerns have been addressed by the application materials with the exception of water quality requirements. CONDITION: The applicant shall pay the water quality fee in lieu or provide a water quality facility that meets CWS regulations. Address Assignments: The City of Tigard is responsible for assigning addresses for parcels within the City of Tigard and within the Urban Service Boundary (USB). An addressing fee in the amount of $30.00 per address shall be assessed. This fee shall be paid to the City prior to issuance of a site permit. For this project, there is no additional addressing fee, as the existing address will be maintained. E. IMPACT STUDY (18.390) Section 18.360.090 states, "The Director shall make a finding with respect to each of the following criteria when approving, approving with conditions or denying an application:' Section 18.390.040 states that the applicant shall provide an impact study to quantify the effect of development on public facilities and services. For each public facility system and type of impact, the study shall propose improvements necessary to meet City standard, and to minimize the impact of the development on the public at large, public facilities systems, and affected private property users. NOTICE OF TYPE II DECISION SDR2002-00010/CINGULAR COMMUNICATIONS MONOPOLE PAGE 18 OF 20 In situations where the Community Development Code requires the dedication of real property interests, the applicant shall either specifically concur with a requirement for public right-of-way dedication, or provide evidence that supports that the real property dedication is not roughly proportional to the projected impacts of the development. Section 18.390.040 states that when a condition of approval requires the transfer to the public of an interest in real property, the approval authority shall adopt findings which support the conclusion that the interest in real property to be transferred is roughly proportional to the impact the proposed development will have on the public. The applicant has provided an impact study addressing the project's impacts on public systems. The study notes that there will be no impact to the transportation system as the facility will only generate two trips per month. Bikeways will likewise not be affected, and there are no bikeways in the immediate area. The drainage system will not be adversely impacted either. As the area to be developed will be covered with semi-pervious gravel, there will be no significant increase to the amount of stormwater runoff that is currently being contributed to the system. Parks, water and sewer systems will not be impacted as the proposed monopole is un-staffed and does not require sewer or water hookups. Earlier in this report, the issue about noise from the air conditioning units was raised, but staff found the degree of separation between the proposed use and noise sensitive uses to adequately protect those uses from noise. There is no TIF assessment for this use as it generates a limited amount of traffic. FINDING: The proposed development either has no impact or will mitigate the effect of the impact for the above noted public systems through the imposition of conditions. SECTION VII. OTHER STAFF COMMENTS The City of Tigard Forester has reviewed the proposal and noted that no trees will be impacted by the proposed improvements, and therefore has no comments. The City of Tigard Crime Prevention Office of the Police Department has reviewed the proposal and has no objections to it. The City of Tigard Public Works Department has reviewed the proposal and has no objections to it. The City of Tigard Building Department was notified of the proposal and did not respond. SECTION VIII. AGENCY COMMENTS Oregon Department of Aviation has reviewed the proposal and has no objections to it. Clean Water Services has reviewed the proposal and has no objections to it. The City of Durham has reviewed the proposal and has no objections to it. Tualatin Valley Fire and Rescue has reviewed the applicant's submittal and provided the following comments: In order to ensure the adequate protection of the public health, safety, and welfare of the citizens of the City of Tigard, no permitted wireless communications facility operator shall operate the permitted facility in any way that impedes, impairs, or negatively impacts the communication abilities of any public safety or emergency response organization serving the public within the City of Tigard's jurisdictional limits. NOTICE OF TYPE II DECISION SDR2002-00010/CINGULAR COMMUNICATIONS MONOPOLE PAGE 19 OF 20 Additionally, it is noted that federal regulations give priority to communications involving safety of life or property, as follows: 47 CFR § 90.403 (d) provides in relevant part, that communications involving the imminent safety of life or property, are to be afforded priority by all licensees. If interference complaints are filed against the cell tower operator, which allege radio frequency interference, the cell tower operator shall provide documentary evidence from the FCC that the cell tower operator has complied with all federal laws and regulations regarding the handling and resolution of such complaints, and confirming that the communications involving the public safety provider have been given priority by the cell tower operator. Washington County Communications (WCCCA), Portland General Electric, NW Natural Gas, AT&T Cable, Verizon, and Qwest Communications were all notified of the proposal and did not respond. SECTION IX. PROCEDURE AND APPEAL INFORMATION Notice: Notice was posted at City Hall and mailed to: X The applicant and owners X Owner of record within the required distance X Affected government agencies Final Decision: THIS DECISION IS FINAL ON AUGUST 8, 2002 AND BECOMES EFFECTIVE ON AUGUST 23, 2002 UNLESS AN APPEAL IS FILED. A_pre_a l_: The decision of the Director (Type II Procedure) or Review Authority (Type II Administrative Appeal or Type III Procedure) is final for purposes of appeal on the date that it is mailed. Any party with standing as provided in Section 18.390.040.G.1. may appeal this decision in accordance with Section 18.390.040.G.2. of the Tigard Community Development Code which provides that a written appeal together with the required fee shall be filed with the Director within ten (10) business days of the date the notice of the decision was mailed. The appeal fee schedule and forms are available from the Planning Division of Tigard City Hall, 13125 SW Hall Boulevard, Tigard, Oregon 97223. Unless the applicant is the appellant, the hearing on an appeal from the Director's Decision shall be confined to the specific issues identified in the written comments submitted by the parties during the comment period. Additional evidence concerning issues properly raised in the Notice of Appeal may be submitted by any party during the appeal hearing, subject to any additional rules of procedure that may be adopted from time to time by the appellate body. LTHE DEADLINE FOR FILING AN APPEAL IS AT 5:00 PM ON AUGUST 22, 2002. Questions: If you have any questions, please call the City of Tigard Planning Division, Tigard City Hall, • 13125 SW Hall Boulevard, Tigard, Oregon at (503) 639-4171. (_.// s' August 8 2002 PREPAR' IBY: Morgan Tr y DATE Associate Planner is\curpin\morgan\workspace\sdr\sdr2002-00010(cingular#2)\sdr2002-00010 decision.doc NOTICE OF TYPE II DECISION SDR2002-00010/CINGULAR COMMUNICATIONS MONOPOLE PAGE 20 OF 20 �' ._ `�mnm -T----__=, 7-aLeL ' .� CITY of TIGARD �,,44'4 I*J fill . �_ jI GEOO RAPNIC IN FORM ATIOM 9V9TEN t •. OR's' ' �; i VICINITY MAP • LN III"11111111111 ■ 1111111 11101 O1�11�111 _ �� ,'� 111111111l1 ��r1�11 <■ SDR2002 00010 draw /Ems C I mmuj/I ��11 X11111111111 �� • •�� x_1:3110 CINGULAR WIRELESS •�/��■'/� RD Ns �1111r�� mum= eIIIIIIII�� r: DURHAM RD MONOPOLE TOWER, T. @ DURHAM TREATMENT p��4i, PLANT \ SRO t. u: iN I: 's: ` ` V y r` , ..- stank ■11111111111111/ 5r �' :PR It1t" . _ /. 9F#F a�i10. DU'FI •�� 4 tiiiIII1�11b.R .. t[s� • Tigard Area Map adW li I • m Y4riRIaII_\�q� N 4 y 0 400 800 Feet •• Wrap 1"•628 feet ..fi4 4°aka A �,;-, A- it; �R. % III City of Tigard DM1110 d,�,p"D Information on this map is for general location only end rill -- ,,��W 44 should be verified vnth the Development Services Division.' V• N:7 13125 SW Hall Blvd �. /�i•/y(. Tigard,OR 97223 • ,�,, . i��^• V (503)539-4171 / 0 wilmo- httpuvnvvci.tigard.or.us Community Development Plot date:Jul 8,2002, C:lmagic\MAGIC03.APR DURUM,RMp Cc Imam .f d rpri-,... is col .. 0 ;jc : ° k' rc...,......_ ,4,,,k, , . ,, i: . ....... ,„,._ „49 :„,r ..•=--,1) 1( 0 0 / Q **0,47440 `��., •yf . ...m. '"4.lu- . k. \ 1 1 4 4°2 16;:0 1. kt%F/44.Vti.:fell. i. , . . ... " i' SA ■&' , :at, / ' NMI lirek '12 . __ • '' i / , - •"-. . I J� ` - . , ''N,....:" ,,•, \--._.,/, ...4.--;,„., z, . - \------/ 0 -.. • v: ... \-/ ! i i h iy r: ,......., , ,,, ..A0 ..,, . , ...„) „----.., . ,. OSITE PLAN ( ENLARGED SITE PLAN OGLE r..x O COM r•• �4, CITY OF TIGARD SDR2002-00010 CITY OF TIGARD SITE PLAN N CINGULAR WIRELESS MONOPOLE TOWER (Map is not to scale) . NOTICE OF TYPE II DECISION SITE DEVELOPMENT REVIEW (SDR) 2002-00010 41 AIil CITY OF TIGARD Community cDeveCopment CINGULAR COMMUNICATIONS MONOPOLE TOWER #2 Sfiaping)4(Better Community 120 DAYS = 11/5/2002 SECTION I. APPLICATION SUMMARY FILE NAME: CINGULAR COMMUNICATIONS MONOPOLE TOWER #2 CASE NOS.: Site Development Review (SDR) SDR2002-00010 PROPOSAL: The applicant is proposing to construct a 100-foot monopole tower for telecommunications service. The associated accessory equipment will be placed within a fenced and landscaped enclosure. APPLICANT: Salmon PCS, Inc. OWNER: Clean Water Services 123 NE 3ru Ave, Suite 240 155 N. First Avenue, Suite 270 Portland, OR 97232 Hillsboro, OR 97124 APPLICANT'S REP: Mericom Corporation Attn: Chris Tigh 2701 NW Vaughn Street, Suite 890 Portland, OR 97210 LOCATION: 16580 SW 85th Avenue; WCTM 2S113B0, Tax Lot 00600. The subject site is located within the Clean Water Services Sewer Treatment Plant, south of Durham Road. ZONE: I-P: Industrial Park District. The I-P zoning district provides appropriate locations for combining light manufacturing, office and small-scale commercial uses, e.g., restaurants, personal services and fitness centers, in a campus-like setting. Only those light industrial uses with no off-site impacts, e.g., noise, glare, odor, vibration, are permitted in the I-P zone. In addition to mandatory site development review, design and development standards in the I-P zone have been adopted to insure that developments will be well-integrated, attractively landscaped, and pedestrian-friendly. APPLICABLE REVIEW CRITERIA: Community Development Code Chapters 18.390, 18.530, 18.705, 18.745, 18.765, 18.795, 18.798 and 18.810. SECTION II . DECISION Notice is hereby given that the City of Tigard Community Development Director's designee has APPROVED the above Site Development Review request subject to certain conditions of approval. The findings and conclusions on which the decision is based are noted in the full decision, available at City Hall. THIS APPROVAL SHALL BE VALID FOR 18 MONTHS FROM THE EFFECTIVE DATE OF THIS DECISION. Aii documents and applicable criteria in the above-noted fiie are available for inspection at no cost or copies can be obtained for twenty-five cents (250 per page, or the current rate charged for copies at the time of the request. SECTION III. PROCEDURE AND APPEAL INFORMATION Notice: Notice mailed to: X The applicant and owners X Owner of record within the required distance X Affected government agencies Final Decision: THIS DECISION IS FINAL ON AUGUST 8, 2002 AND BECOMES EFFECTIVE ON AUGUST 23, 2002 UNLESS AN APPEAL IS FILED. AeaL The Director's Decision is final on the date that it is mailed. All persons entitled to notice or who are otherwise adversely affected or aggrieved by the decision as provided in Section 18.390.040.G.1 may appeal this decision in accordance with Section 18.390.040.G.2 of the Tigard Community Development Code which provides that a written appeal together with the required fee shall be filed with the Director within ten (10) business days of the date the Notice of Decision was mailed. The appeal fee schedule and forms are available from the Planning Division of Tigard City Hall, 13125 SW Hall Boulevard, Tigard, Oregon 97223. Unless the applicant is the appellant, the hearing on an appeal from the Director's Decision shall be confined to the specific issues identified in the written comments submitted by the parties during the comment period. Additional evidence concerning issues properly raised in the Notice of Appeal may be submitted by any party during the appeal hearing, subject to any additional rules of procedure that may be adopted from time to time by the appellate body. I THE DEADLINE FOR FILING AN APPEAL IS 5:00 PM ON AUGUST 22, 2002. I Questions: For further information please contact the Planning Division Staff Planner, Morgan Tracy at (503) 639-4171 , Tigard City Hall, 13125 SW Hall Boulevard, Tigard, Oregon 97223. RaptF.��",.1I \.....u11� III mob:dNL�Wl i��-I Y I TIG�HG s ; 111111111111 C �� 0...4101 r��11111:- 1.4\ orml as-- ""�-■J■wig pie`♦gt, Nr,,, z �.'�i r..O Ma ul=_ �� ,�.,.�� .111 ��III��4 aaaD\111111�■ VICINITY MAP ' •��' 0:.4*I -'11111111111 (11111 �� ,��1=j'��a�G mum"j�1 '��II 1/111111 11111111111�� ogran, MI u` SDR2001.00010 Pr2.Illllydh■■s NE IIIII�,• w ill_ -11 1. I� CINGULAR WIRELESS IC t MONOPOLE TOWER Ci " r .. @ DURHAM TREATMENT PLANT I Iwa1111LI�1e�IuII1 / 1 I / A`I--::,.; Npi, v..1lW►'�� . . X111 _ , Mir; { - 111111111�- �I I- ®,_ 46 alb 0 �� :l ion,i ifk 44). ._41trielsol 111111"11w,in 67111.1m: IIIMPro A% avM■ - :' .. .j - 1-- 'Jg I 0 WI elk..1 4 N aist 1,,f4zt.,..v4.7),. T.,_„,,,,,4 . 1.d'Ks . ,ii,47. „v- ...',"7-. , 6. L.1 ' '`Of tlY,'-111 " .%1 ' .:.../17: f I7.. -..,*,,,-- ,. O?..,.,..re O.a,Maw.a p.. CITY OF TIGARD T SDR2002.00010 BITE PLAN N CINGULAR WIRELESS MONOPOLE TOWER Jap It not to scale) ,r AFFIDAVIT OF POSTING NOTICE OF A LAND USE PROPOSAL **1 IMPORTANT NOTICE: THIS AFFIDAVIT MUST BE ACCOMPANIED BY A COPY OF THE NOTICE THAT WAS POSTED ON THE SITE. In the Matter of the Proposed Land Use Applications for: Land Use File Nos.: SDR2002-00010 Land Use File Name: CINGULAR WIRELESS MONOPOLE TOWER I, Morgan Tracy, Associate Planner for the City of Tigard, do affirm that I posted notice of the land use proposal affecting the land located at (state the approximate location(s) IF no address(s) and/or tax lot(s) currently registered) and did personally post notice of the proposed land use application(s) by means of weatherproof posting in the general vicinity of the affected territory, a copy of said notice being hereto attached and by reference made a part hereof, on the ' day of , 2002. Signature of Person Who Performed Posting (In the presence of the Notary) (THIS SECTION FOR A STATE OF OREGON, NOTARY PUBLIC TO COMPLETE/NOTARIZE) STATE OF OREGON ) County of Washington ) ss. ,T` Subscribed and sworn/affirmed before me on the /C day of - , 20 OZ. OFFICIAL SEAL SHERMAN S.CASPER ` r NOTARVPUBUC.OREGON NOTARY PUBLIC OF OREGON MYCOMMISSIO COMMISSION My Commission Expires: Mad) 3, 2003 h:Vogin\patty\masters\affidavit of posting for applicant to post public hearing.doc CINGULAR WIRELESS MONOPOLE TOWER SITE DEVELOPMENT REVIEW (SDR) 2002-00010 REQUEST: The applicant is requesting Site Development Review approval to construct a 100-foot monopole tower for telecommunications service. The associated accessory equipment will be placed within a fenced and 3ndscaped enclosure. LOCATION : 16580 SW 85th Avenue; WCTM 2S113B0, Tax Lot 600. ZONE: I-P: Industrial Park District. The I-P zoning district provides appropriate locations for combining light manufacturing, office and small-scale commercial uses, e.g. , restaurants, personal services and fitness centers, in a campus-like setting. Only those light industrial uses with no off-site impacts, e.g. , noise, glare, odor, vibration, are permitted in the I-P zone. In addition to mandatory site development review, design and development standards in the I-P zone have been adopted to insure that developments will be well-integrated, attractively landscaped, and pedestrian- friendly. APPLICABLE REVIEW CRITERIA: Community Development Code Chapters 18.390, 18.530, 18.705, 18.745, 18.765, 18.795, 18.798 and 18.810. Further information may be obtained from the Planning Division (staff contact: Morgan Tracy) at 13125 SW Hall Blvd., Tigard, Oregon 97223, or by calling 503-639-4171 . A copy of the application and all documents and evidence submitted by or on behalf of the applicant and the applicable criteria are available for inspection at no cost and copies for all items can also be provided at a reasonable cost. NOTICE TO MORTGAGEE, LIENHOLDER,VENDOR OR SELLER: THE TIGARD DEVELOPMENT CODE REQUIRES THAT IF YOU RECEIVE THIS NOTICE,IT SHALL BE PROMPTLY FORWARDED TO THE PURCHASER. NOTICE OF PENDING LAND USE APPLICATION SITE DEVELOPMENT REVIEW CITY TY OF TIGARD Community DeveCopment Shaping Better Community DATE OF NOTICE: July 8, 2002 FILE NUMBER: SITE DEVELOPMENT REVIEW (SDR) 2002-00010 Type II Land Use Application FILE NAME: CINGULAR WIRELESS MONOPOLE TOWER @ DURHAM TREATMENT PLANT PROPOSAL: The applicant is requesting Site Development Review approval to construct a 100-foot monopole tower for telecommunications service. The associated accessory equipment will be placed within a fenced and landscaped enclosure. ZONE: I-P: Industrial Park District. The I-P zoning district provides appropriate locations for combining light manufacturing, office and small-scale commercial uses, e.g., restaurants, personal services and fitness centers, in a campus-like setting. Only those light industrial uses with no off-site impacts, e.g., noise, glare, odor, vibration, are permitted in the I-P zone. In addition to mandatory site development review, design and development standards in the I-P zone have been adopted to insure that developments will be well-integrated, attractively landscaped, and pedestrian-friendly. APPLICABLE REVIEW CRITERIA: Community Development Code Chapters 18.390, 18.530, 18.705, 18.745, 18.765, 18.795, 18.798 and 18.810. LOCATION: 16580 SW 85th Avenue; WCTM 2S113B0, Tax Lot 600. YOUR RIGHT TO PROVIDE WRITTEN COMMENTS: Prior to the City making any decision on the Application, you are hereby provided a fourteen (14) day period to submit written comments on the application to the City. THE FOURTEEN (14) DAY PERIOD ENDS AT 5:00 PM ON JULY 22, 2002. All comments should be directed to Morgan Tracy, Associate Planner in the Planning Division at the City of Tigard, 13125 SW Hall Boulevard, Tigard, Oregon 97223. You may reach the City of Tigard by telephone at (503) 639-4171. ALL COMMENTS MUST BE RECEIVED BY THE CITY OF TIGARD IN WRITING PRIOR TO 5:00 PM ON THE DATE SPECIFIED ABOVE IN ORDER FOR YOUR COMMENTS TO BE CONSIDERED IN THE DECISION MAKING PROCESS THE CITY OF TIGARD APPRECIATES RECEIVING COMMENTS AND VALUES YOUR INPUT. COMMENTS WILL BE CONSIDERED AND ADDRESSED WITHIN THE NOTICE OF DECISION. A DECISION ON THIS ISSUE IS TENTATIVELY SCHEDULED FOR AUGUST 19, 2002. IF YOU PROVIDE COMMENTS, YOU WILL BE SENT A COPY OF THE FULL DECISION ONCE IT HAS BEEN RENDERED. WRITTEN COMMENTS WILL BECOME A PART OF THE PERMANENT PUBLIC RECORD AND SHALL CONTAIN THE FOLLOWING INFORMATION: • Address the specific "Applicable Review Criteria" described in the section above or any other criteria believed to be applicable to this proposal; • Raise any issues and/or concerns believed to be important with sufficient evidence to allow the City to provide a response; • Comments that provide the basis for an appeal to the Tigard Hearings Officer must address the relevant approval criteria with sufficient specificity on that issue. Failure of any party to address the relevant approval criteria with sufficient specificity may preclude subsequent appeals to the Land Use Board of Appeals or Circuit Court on that issue. Specific findings directed at the relevant approval criteria are what constitute relevant evidence. AFTER THE 14 DAY COMMENT PERIOD CLOSES, THE DIRECTOR SHALL ISSUE A TYPE II ADMINISTRATIVE DECISION. THE DIRECTOR'S DECISION SHALL BE MAILED TO THE APPLICANT AND TO OWNERS OF RECORD OF PROPERTY LOCATED WITHIN 500 FEET OF THE SUBJECT SITE, AND TO ANYONE ELSE WHO SUBMITTED WRITTEN COMMENTS OR WHO IS OTHERWISE ENTITLED TO NOTICE. THE DIRECTOR'S DECISION SHALL ADDRESS ALL OF THE RELEVANT APPROVAL CRITERIA. BASED UPON THE CRITERIA AND THE FACTS CONTAINED WITHIN THE RECORD, THE DIRECTOR SHALL APPROVE, APPROVE WITH CONDITIONS OR DENY THE REQUESTED PERMIT OR ACTION. SUMMARY OF THE DECISION-MAKING PROCESS: . The application is accepted by the City . Notice is sent to property owners of record within 500 feet of the proposed development area allowing a 14-day written comment period. . The application is reviewed by City Staff and affected agencies. . City Staff issues a written decision. . Notice of the decision is sent to the Applicant and all owners or contract purchasers of record of the site; all owners of record of property located within 500 feet of the site, as shown on the most recent property tax assessment roll; any City-recognized neighborhood group whose boundaries include the site; and any governmental agency which is entitled to notice under an intergovernmental agreement entered into with the City which includes provision for such notice or anyone who is otherwise entitled to such notice. INFORMATION/EVIDENCE AVAILABLE FOR REVIEW: The application, written comments and supporting documents relied upon by the Director to make this decision are contained within the record and are available for public review at the City of Tigard Community Development Department. Copies of these items may be obtained at a cost of $.25 per page or the current rate charged for this service. Questions regarding this application should be directed to the Planning Staff indicated on the first page of this Notice under the section titled "Your Right to Provide Written Comments." PrZr-� � - � -- CITY OfTIGARD ors A 111111111111 � !,w ;;�'il; 1011111■■■= KiNe .C!7!I v. �.1 III,.1 ��: 111= VICINITY MAP � '`r� � �� C'11111111111 � . 111111 �7 *�♦ °��ittaj is _ r =maim 11111111111 ;■� SDR2002 00010 ♦ ��. ��G 111111111 1 . O 111111111'" \■■��/■■■■ ..1 Dupes. p��-.-..mill ■11111111111-! g I�IIU� N. CINGULAR WIRELESS _ N MONOPOLE TOWER \ ., „r PLAN @ DURHAM T TREATMENT IN II ,w 1c4 1111111111. ' 5 4.0111M41 ( w*Jul�uii� ._ I ; . w.A, — ! •.1IIIII1111p; ally.,,/. • N - 1„110 V:47iel ilik �F11 NI x'1`4" \- City liprd I..wni.l.r.-F.A•Y.wtiY.aYw.+I W REQUEST FOR COMMENTS azo 7;?.. _ a CITY OF TIGAPD G oo CURRENT PLANK/NG AUG-8'02 irr 0 • •13125 SW HALL BLVD _ TIGARD, OR 97223 - OR PB U.S.R ` 83599599 96 6 ccO UTCHINSON MARKS& MID • • - 8550 SW STRATFORD CT TIGARD,OR 97224 1'IiLJ�7V Y/CCY. VO 10.41 1/ V0/ 1V/ WC FORWARD TIME EXP RTN TO SEND MIDSON 'CLARE N 1911 NW 24TH PL PORTLAND OR 972.0-2543 RETURN TO SENDER i 3 i i 1 1 _f i E i j I I{i�iiii�?i?!i!li. ?ii! lii}r!ij 414a REQUEST FOR COMMENTS CInOFTICiARD Community(Development ShapingA Better Community DATE: luly 8,2002 TO: Sherman Casper,Permit Coordinator/Community Development Department FROM: City of Tigard Planning Division STAFF CONTACT: Morgan Tracy,Associate Planner[x2428) Phone: [5031639-4111/Fax: [5031684-1291 SITE DEVELOPMENT REVIEW(SDRI 2002-00010 CINGULAR WIRELESS MONOPOLE TOWER @ DURHAM TREATMENT PLANT REQUEST: The applicant is requesting Site Development Review approval to construct a 100-foot monopole tower for telecommunications service. The associated accessory equipment will be placed within a fenced and landscaped enclosure. LOCATION: 16580 SW 85th Avenue; WCTM 2S113B0, Tax Lot 600. ZONE: I-P: Industrial Park District. The I-P zoning district provides appropriate locations for combining light manufacturing, office and small-scale commercial uses, e.g., restaurants, personal services and fitness centers, in a campus-like setting. Only those light industrial uses with no off-site impacts, e.g., noise, glare, odor, vibration, are permitted in the I-P zone. In addition to mandatory site development review, design and development standards in the I-P zone have been adopted to insure that developments will be well-integrated, attractively landscaped, and pedestrian-friendly. APPLICABLE REVIEW CRITERIA: Community Development Code Chapters 18.390, 18.530, 18.705, 18.745, 18.765, 18.795, 18.798 and 18.810. Attached are the Site Plan, Vicinity Map and Applicant's Materials for your review. From information supplied by various departments and agencies and from other information available to our staff, a report and recommendation will be prepared and a decision will be rendered on the proposal in the near future. If you wish to comment on this application, WE NEED YOUR COMMENTS BACK BY: JULY 22, 2002. You may use the space provided below or attach a separate letter to return your comments. If you are unable to respond by the above date, please phone the staff contact noted above with your comments and confirm your comments in writing as soon as possible. If you have any questions, contact the Tigard Planning Division, 13125 SW Hall Boulevard, Tigard, OR 97223. PLEASE CHECK THE FOLLOWING ITEMS THAT APPLY: We have reviewed the proposal and have no objections to it. Please contact of our office. Please refer to the enclosed letter. Written comments provided below: A/ T'j/= /4/1 /iC4‘/t 40, motv/o t re. ..,tt Name & Number of Person Commenting: REQUEST FOR COMMENTS CITY OF TIGARD Community DeveCopment Shaping fetter Community DATE: July 8,2002 TO: 1 lyhn Roy,Property_Manager/Puhlic Works Department FROM: ! City of Tigard Planning Division STAFF CONTACT: Morgan Tracy,Associate Planner[x24281 Phone: (5031 639-4111/Fax: [5031 684-1291 SITE DEVELOPMENT REVIEW MDR]2002-00010 CINGULAR WIRELESS MONOPOLE TOWER @ DURHAM TREATMENT PLANT REQUEST: The applicant is requesting Site Development Review approval to construct a 100-foot monopole tower for telecommunications service. The associated accessory equipment will be placed within a fenced and landscaped enclosure. LOCATION: 16580 SW 85th Avenue; WCTM 2S113B0, Tax Lot 600. ZONE: I-P: Industrial Park District. The I-P zoning district provides appropriate locations for combining light manufacturing, office and small-scale commercial uses, e.g., restaurants, personal services and fitness centers, in a campus-like setting. Only those light industrial uses with no off-site impacts, e.g., noise, glare, odor, vibration, are permitted in the I-P zone. In addition to mandatory site development review, design and development standards in the I-P zone have been adopted to insure that developments will be well-integrated, attractively landscaped, and pedestrian-friendly. APPLICABLE REVIEW CRITERIA: Community Development Code Chapters 18.390, 18.530, 18.705, 18.745, 18.765, 18.795, 18.798 and 18.810. Attached are the Site Plan, Vicinity Map and Applicant's Materials for your review. From information supplied by various departments and agencies and from other information available to our staff, a report and recommendation will be prepared and a decision will be rendered on the proposal in the near future. If you wish to comment on this application, WE NEED YOUR COMMENTS BACK BY: JULY 22, 2002. You may use the space provided below or attach a separate letter to return your comments. If you are unable to respond by the above date, please phone the staff contact noted above with your comments and confirm your comments in writing as soon as possible. If you have any questions, contact the Tigard Planning Division, 13125 SW Hall Boulevard, Tigard, OR 97223. PLE SE CHECK THE FOLLOWING ITEMS THAT APPLY: We have reviewed the proposal and have no objections to it. Please contact of our office. Please refer to the enclosed letter. Written comments provided below: Name & Number of Person Commenting: REQUEST FOR COMMENTS CInOFT10ARD Community Development Shaping Better Community DATE: July 8,2002 TO: Jim Wolf,Tigard Police Department Crime Prevention Officer FROM: City of Tigard Planning Division STAFF CONTACT: Morgan Tracy,Associate Planner(x24281 Phone: 15031639-4111/Fax: (5031684-1291 SITE DEVELOPMENT REVIEW ISDRI 2002-00010 CINGULAR WIRELESS MONOPOLE TOWER @ DURHAM TREATMENT PLANT REQUEST: The applicant is requesting Site Development Review approval to construct a 100-foot monopole tower for telecommunications service. The associated accessory equipment will be placed within a fenced and landscaped enclosure. LOCATION: 16580 SW 85th Avenue; WCTM 2S113B0, Tax Lot 600. ZONE: I-P: Industrial Park District. The I-P zoning district provides appropriate locations for combining light manufacturing, office and small-scale commercial uses, e.g., restaurants, personal services and fitness centers, in a campus-like setting. Only those light industrial uses with no off-site impacts, e.g., noise, glare, odor, vibration, are permitted in the I-P zone. In addition to mandatory site development review, design and development standards in the I-P zone have been adopted to insure that developments will be well-integrated, attractively landscaped, and pedestrian-friendly. APPLICABLE REVIEW CRITERIA: Community Development Code Chapters 18.390, 18.530, 18.705, 18.745, 18.765, 18.795, 18.798 and 18.810. Attached are the Site Plan, Vicinity Map and Applicant's Materials for your review. From information supplied by various departments and agencies and from other information available to our staff, a report and recommendation will be prepared and a decision will be rendered on the proposal in the near future. If you wish to comment on this application, WE NEED YOUR COMMENTS BACK BY: JULY 22, 2002. You may use the space provided below or attach a separate letter to return your comments. If you are unable to respond by the above date, please phone the staff contact noted above with your comments and confirm your comments in writing as soon as possible. If you have any questions, contact the Tigard Planning Division, 13125 SW Hall Boulevard, Tigard, OR 97223. PLEASE CHECK THE FOLLOWING ITEMS THAT APPLY: / We have reviewed the proposal and have no objections to it. Please contact of our office. Please refer to the enclosed letter. Written comments provided below: Name & Number of Person Commenting: d.\ O,\ .� )SV� REQUEST FOR COMMENTS CITY OFTIGARD Community(Development Shaping)4 Better Community DATE: luly 8,2002 Pl TO: City of Durham City Manager T `D JUL 9 - 2002 FROM: City of Tigard Planning Division BY: STAFF CONTACT: Morgan Tracy,Associate Planner 1x24281 Phone: (5031639-4111/Fax: (5031684-1291 SITE DEVELOPMENT REVIEW ISORI 2002-00010 CIRCULAR WIRELESS MONOPOLE TOWER @ DURHAM TREATMENT PLANT REQUEST: The applicant is requesting Site Development Review approve! to construct a 100-foot monopole tower for telecommunications service. The associated accessory equipment will be placed within a fenced and landscaped enclosure. LOCATION: 16580 SW 85th Avenue; WCTM 2S113B0, Tax Lot 600. ZONE: I-P: Industrial Park District. The I-P zoning district provides appropriate locations for combining light manufacturing, office and small-scale commercial uses, e.g., restaurants, personal services and fitness centers, in a campus-like setting. Only those light industrial uses with no off-site impacts, e.g., noise, glare, odor, vibration, are permitted in the I-P zone. In addition to mandatory site development review, design and development standards in the I-P zone have been adopted to insure that developments will be well-integrated, attractively landscaped, and pedestrian-friendly. APPLICABLE REVIEW CRITERIA: Community Development Code Chapters 18.390, 18.530, 18.705, 18.745, 18.765, 18.795, 18.798 and 18.810. Attached are the Site Plan, Vicinity Map and Applicant's Materials for your review. From information supplied by various departments and agencies and from other information available to our staff, a report and recommendation will be prepared and a decision will be rendered on the proposal in the near future. If you wish to comment on this application, WE NEED YOUR COMMENTS BACK BY: JULY 22, 2002. You may use the space provided below or attach a separate letter to return your comments. If you are unable to respond by the above date, please phone the staff contact noted above with your comments and confirm your comments in writing as soon as possible. If you have any questions, contact the Tigard Planning Division, 13125 SW Hall Boulevard, Tigard, OR 97223. PLEASE CHECK THE FOLLOWING ITEMS THAT APPLY: We have reviewed the proposal and have no objections to it. Please contact ffio our f our v vin�,a. Please refer to the enclosed letter. Written comments provided below: teems 6. Lv•cidov�Si �o � 63y6 Jig-( Name & Number of Person Commenting: 07/24/02 05:52 FAX 503 640 3525 CLEAN WATER SERVICES 2001 REQUEST FOR COMMENTS CITY of nonRD Community(Development Sizuz i A Better Community BATE: July 8,2002 JUL 0 g 2002 Leo Walker,CleanWater Services/SWM Program - 13y- FROM: City of Tigard Planning Division To STAllzgOillACT: Morgan Tracy,Associate Planner 1x2428) Phone: [503)639-4111/Pax: [5031 684-1291 SITE DEVELOPMENT REVIEW[SORT 2002-00010 CINGULAR WIRELESS MONOPOLE TOWER @ DURHAM TREATMENT PLANT < REQUEST: The applicant is requesting Site Development Review approval to construct a 100-foot monopole tower for telecommunications service. The associated accessory equipment will be placed within a fenced and landscaped enclosure. LOCATION: 16580 SW 85 Avenue; WCTM 2S113B0, Tax Lot 600. ZONE: l-P: Industrial Park District. The I-P zoning district provides appropriate locations for combining light manufacturing, office and small-scale commercial uses, e.g., restaurants, personal services and fitness centers, in a campus-like setting. Only those light industrial uses with no off-site impacts, e.g., noise, glare, odor, vibration, are permitted in the I-P zone- In addition to mandatory site development review, design and development standards in the 1-P zone have been adopted to insure that developments will be well-integrated, attractively landscaped, and pedestrian-friendly. APPLICABLE REVIEW CRITERIA: Community Development Code Chat,:ters 18.390, 18.530, 18.705, 18.745, 18.765, 18.795, 18.798 and 18.810. Attached are the Site Plan, Vicinity Map and Applicant's Materials for your review. From information supplied by various departments and agencies and from other information available to our staff, a report and recommendation will be prepared and a decision will be rendered on the proposal in the near future. If you wish to comment on this application, WE NEED YOUR COMMENTS BACK BY: JULY 22. 2002. You may use the space provided below or attach a separate letter to return your comments. If you are unable to respond by the above date, please p hone the staff contact noted above with your comments and confirm your comments in writing as soon as possible. If you have any questions, contact the Tigard Planning Division, 13125 SW Hall Boulevard Tigard, OR 97223. PLEA S iI C�EI4 T i H t,' Mail l'II 1l, _ We have reviewed the proposal and have no objections to it. of our office. Please contact — Please refer to the enclosed letter. Written comments provided below: Name & Number of Person Commenting: Morgan Tracy-Cingular Wireless Monor-''Tower.doc Page 1 TUALATIN VALLEY FIRE & RESCUE • SOUTH DIVISION COMMUNITY SERVICES • OPERATIONS • FIRE PREVENTION June 3,2002 Mr. Morgan Tracy,Associate Planner City of Tigard 13125 SW Hall Blvd Tigard,OR 97223 Re: Cingular Wireless Monopole Tower,Casefile No. SDR 2002-00007/VAR 2002-00017 Dear Morgan, Emergency service providers,both police and fire, have been experiencing ongoing interference problems with our 800 MHz radio system. As wireless communications providers continue to expand their use of the frequency spectrum,we can expect the problem to get worse. As a result,we have done an extensive amount of research in an attempt to determine what actions might be taken at the local level to protect public safety communications systems. We have determined that our local planning departments can be a key component in the protection of the emergency communication capabilities of their police and fire departments. It is well established that local jurisdictions have the right to attach reasonable conditions to the approval of conditional use permits for communication sites. Within that context,we feel that local jurisdictions have the responsibility to attach conditions that protect the public safety of its citizens. Accordingly,we suggest that clause be included as a condition of approval for the application referenced above: "In order to ensure the adequate protection of the public safety, health and welfare of the citizens of Tigard, no permitted cell tower operator,"wireless communication facility" operator,"radio frequency transmission facility"operator,communication site operator,[or however the local code describes a cell tower operator],shall operate the permitted facility in any way that impedes,impairs,or negatively impacts the communication abilities of any public safety or emergency response organization serving the public within Tigard's jurisdictional limits." Additionally,you may want to include a clause that makes the federal regulations that require priority be given to communications involving safety-of-life or property as a condition of approval. Such language might read as follows: 47 CFR§90.403(d)provides,in relevant part,that communications involving the imminent safety-of-life or property,are to be afforded priority by all licensees. If interference complaints are filed against the cell tower operator,which allege radio frequency interference,the cell tower operator shall provide documentary evidence from the FCC that the cell tower operator has complied with all federal laws and regulations regarding the handling and resolution of such complaints,and confirming that the communications involving the public safety provider have been given priority by the cell tower operator. Thank you for your consideration of this vital public safety concern. Respectfully, Gary C.Wells Division Chief 7401 SW Washo Court,Suite 101•Tualatin,Oregon fril.22.4 HI.(503)612-7000•Fax(503)612-7003•www.tvfr.com 07/19/02 FRI 10:35 FAX 503 373 1688 AERONAUTICS I)001 Advancing OREGON DEPARTMENT OF AVIATION 3040 25TH ST SE 4/ Aviation SALEM OR 97302-1125 40 in Oregon TEL: 503/378-4880 FAX 503/373-1688 facsimile transmittal To: Morgan Tracy Fax: (503)684-7297 From: Mike Rock Date: 7/19/02 Re: Monopole at Durham Treat.Plant Pages: (2)including this coversheet CC: D Urgent g For Review ❑ Please Comment ❑ Please Reply ❑ Please Recycle 07/19/02 FRI 10:36 FAX 503 373 1688 AERONAUTICS .002 • 0 s - 0163 REQUEST FOR COMMENTS CITY OP MARC Community Devefopmcnt Shaping A(Better Community DATE: July 8,2002 TO: Tom HIghland,Oregon Department of Aviation FROM: City of Tigard Planning Division STAFF CONTACT: Morgan Tracy,Associate Planner[x24281 Phone: [5031639-4171/Fax: [5031684-1297 SITE DEVELOPMENT REVIEW[SDBI 2002-00010 ➢ CINGULAR WIRELESS MONOPOLE TOWER ©DURHAM TREATMENT PLANT Q REQUEST: The applicant is requesting Site Development Rev approval to construct a 100-foot monopole tower for telecommunications service. The associated accessory equipment will be placed within a fenced and landscaped enclosure. LOCATION: 16580 SW 85th Avenue; WCTM 2S113B0, Tax Lot 600. ZONE: I-P: Industrial Park District. The I-P zoning district provides appropriate locations for combining light manufacturing, office and small-scale commercial uses, e.g., restaurants, personal services and fitness centers, in a campus-like setting. Only those light industrial uses with no off-site impacts, e.g., noise, glare, odor, vibration, are permitted in the I-P zone. In addition to mandatory site development review, design and development standards in the I-P zone have been adopted to insure that developments will be well-integrated, attractively landscaped, and pedestrian-friendly. APPLICABLE REVIEW CRITERIA: Community Development Code Chapters 18.390, 18.530, 18.705, 18.745, 18.765, 18.795, 18.798 and 18.810. Attached are the Site Plan, Vicinity Map and Applicant's Materials for your review. From information supplied by various departments and agencies and from other information available to our staff, a report and recommendation will be prepared and a decision will be rendered on the proposal in the near future. If you wish to comment on this application, WE NEED YOUR COMMENTS BACK BY: JULY 22, 2002. You may use the space provided below or attach a separate letter to return your comments. If you are unable to respond by the above date, please phone the staff contact noted above with your comments and confirm your comments in writing as soon as possible. If you have any questions, contact the Tigard Planning Division, 13125 SW Hall Boulevard, Tigard, OR 97223. PLEASE CHECK THE FOLLOWING' ITEMS THAT APPLY: )( We have reviewed the proposal and have no objections to it. of our office. Please contact Please refer to the enclosed letter. Written comments provided below: Name & Number of Person Commenting: mftNA*t D. Qor.0 £ 1-8co -87'V-0102 X- 23S REQUEST FOR COMMENTS CITY YOFTIOARD Community(Development SkapingA Better Community DATE: July 8,2002 RECEIVED PLANNING TO: Matt Stine,Urban Forester/Public Works Department JUL 1 .1 2002 FROM: City of Tigard Planning Division ctN OF TiGARI3 STAFF CONTACT: Morgan Tracy,Associate Planner[x24281 Phone: (5031639-4171/Fax: [503)684-1291 SITE DEVELOPMENT REVIEW ISDRI 2002-00010 CINGULAR WIRELESS MONOPOLE TOWER @ DURHAM TREATMENT PLANT REQUEST: The applicant is requesting Site Development Review approval to construct a 100-foot monopole tower for telecommunications service. The associated accessory equipment will be placed within a fenced and landscaped enclosure. LOCATION: 16580 SW 85th Avenue; WCTM 2S113B0, Tax Lot 600. ZONE: I-P: Industrial Park District. The I-P zoning district provides appropriate locations for combining light manufacturing, office and small-scale commercial uses, e.g., restaurants, personal services and fitness centers, in a campus-like setting. Only those light industrial uses with no off-site impacts, e.g., noise, glare, odor, vibration, are permitted in the I-P zone. In addition to mandatory site development review, design and development standards in the I-P zone have been adopted to insure that developments will be well-integrated, attractively landscaped, and pedestrian-friendly. APPLICABLE REVIEW CRITERIA: Community Development Code Chapters 18.390, 18.530, 18.705, 18.745, 18.765, 18.795, 18.798 and 18.810. Attached are the Site Plan, Vicinity Map and Applicant's Materials for your review. From information supplied by various departments and agencies and from other information available to our staff, a report and recommendation will be prepared and a decision will be rendered on the proposal in the near future. If you wish to comment on this application, WE NEED YOUR COMMENTS BACK BY: JULY 22, 2002. You may use the space provided below or attach a separate letter to return your comments. If you are unable to respond by the above date, please phone the staff contact noted above with your comments and confirm your comments in writing as soon as possible. If you have any questions, contact the Tigard Planning Division, 13125 SW Hall Boulevard, Tigard, OR 97223. PLEASE CHECK THE FOLLOWING ITEMS THAT APPLY: We have reviewed the proposal and have no objections to it. Please contact of our office. Please refer to the enclosed letter. Written comments provided below: A/ A)o rni tiu fi-TT Name & Number of Person Commenting: REQUEST FOR COMMENTS CITY OFTIOARD Community'Deve(opment Shaping Better Community DATE: July 8,2002 TO: PER ATTACHED FROM: City of Tigard Planning Division STAFF CONTACT: Morgan Tracy,Associate Planner[x24281 Phone: (5031639-4111/Fax: [503)684-1291 SITE DEVELOPMENT REVIEW(SDR12002-00010 CINGULAR WIRELESS MONOPOLE TOWER @ DURHAM TREATMENT PLANT REQUEST: The applicant is requesting Site Development Review approval to construct a 100-foot monopole tower for telecommunications service. The associated accessory equipment will be placed within a fenced and landscaped enclosure. LOCATION: 16580 SW 85th Avenue; WCTM 2S113B0, Tax Lot 600. ZONE: I-P: Industrial Park District. The I-P zoning district provides appropriate locations for combining light manufacturing, office and small-scale commercial uses, e.g., restaurants, personal services and fitness centers, in a campus-like setting. Only those light industrial uses with no off-site impacts, e.g., noise, glare, odor, vibration, are permitted in the I-P zone. In addition to mandatory site development review, design and development standards in the I-P zone have been adopted to insure that developments will be well-integrated, attractively landscaped, and pedestrian-friendly. APPLICABLE REVIEW CRITERIA: Community Development Code Chapters 18.390, 18.530, 18.705, 18.745, 18.765, 18.795, 18.798 and 18.810. Attached are the Site Plan, Vicinity Map and Applicant's Materials for your review. From information supplied by various departments and agencies and from other information available to our staff, a report and recommendation will be prepared and a decision will be rendered on the proposal in the near future. If you wish to comment on this application, WE NEED YOUR COMMENTS BACK BY: JULY 22, 2002. You may use the space provided below or attach a separate letter to return your comments. If you are unable to respond by the above date, please phone the staff contact noted above with your comments and confirm your comments in writing as soon as possible. If you have any questions, contact the Tigard Planning Division, 13125 SW Hall Boulevard, Tigard, OR 97223. PLEASE CHECK THE FOLLOWING ITEMS THAT APPLY: We have reviewed the proposal and have no objections to it. Please contact of our office. Please refer to the enclosed letter. Written comments provided below: Name & Number of Person Commenting: CITY TIGARD REQUEST FOR CO P :NTS NOTIFICATION LIST FOR LAND USE & COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT APPLICATIONS FILE NOS.: _20g.21,02.--06(.)10 #� yfL CITIZEN INVOLVEMENT TEAMS 1 14-DAY PENDING APPLICATION NOTICE TO CIT AREA: ❑Central ❑East ,South ❑West Ii1Proposal Descrip.in Library CIT Book CITY OFFICES _LONG RANGE PLANNING/Barbara Shields,Planning Mgr. COMMUNITY DVLPMNT.DEPT./Planning-Engineering Techs. /POLICE DEPT./Jim Wolf,Crime Prevention Officer r/BUILDING DIVISION/Gary Lampella,Building Official ,s ENGINEERING DEPT./Brian Rager,Dvlpmnt.Review Engineer_WATER DEPTJDennis Koellermeier,Operations Mgr _CITY ADMINISTRATION/Cathy Wheatley,City Recorder _PUBLIC WORKS/John Roy,Property Manager _'/PUBLIC WORKS/Matt Stine,Urban Forester a'PLANNER—POST PROJECT SITE IF A PUBLIC HEARING ITEM-10 BUSINESS DAYS PRIOR TO THE PUBLIC HEARING! C.DJSherman Casper,Permit Coord.(SDR/CUP re TIF) SPECIAL DISTRICTS /CLEANWATER_ TUAL.HILLS PARK&REC.DIST.*_ TUALATIN VALLEY FIRE&RESCUE* _ TUALATIN VALLEY WATER DISTRICT* / E SERVICES* Planning Manager Fire Marshall Administrative Office Lee Walker/SWM Program 15707 SW Walker Road Washington County Fire District PO Box 745 155 N.First Avenue Beaverton,OR 97006 (place in pick-up box) Beaverton,OR 97075 Hillsboro,OR 97124 LOCAL AND STATE JURISDICTIONS CITY OF BEAVERTON * _ CITY OF TUALATIN * _OR.DEPT.OF FISH&WILDLIFE OR.DIV.OF STATE LANDS _ Planning Manager Planning Manager 2501 SW First Avenue Jennifer Goodridge _ Irish Bunnell,Development Services PO Box 369 PO Box 59 775 Summer Street NE PO Box 4755 Tualatin,OR 97062 Portland,OR 97207 Salem,OR 97301-1279 Beaverton,OR 97076 _ OR.PUB.UTILITIES COMM. / METRO-LAND USE&PLANNING * _OR.DEPT.OF GEO.&MINERAL IND. 550 Capitol Street NE CITY OF DURHAM ♦ 600 NE Grand Avenue 800 NE Oregon Street,Suite 5 Salem,OR 97310-1380 City Manager Portland,OR 97232-2736 Portland,OR 97232 PO Box 23483 _ Bob Knight,Data Resource Center(ZCA) _US ARMY CORPS.OF ENG. Durham,OR 97281-3483 _ Paulette Allen,Growth Management Coordinator _OR.DEPT.OF LAND CONSERV.&DVLP. Kathryn Harris Mel Huie,Greenspaces Coordinator(CPA/ZOA) Larry French(Comp.Plan Amendments Only) Routing CENWP-OP-G _CITY OF KING CITY * _ Jennifer Budhabhatti,Reganal Planner(Wetlands) 635 Capitol Street NE,Suite 150 PO Box 2946 City Manager _ C.D.Manager,Growth Management Services Salem,OR 97301-2540 Portland,OR 97208-2946 15300 SW 116th Avenue King City,OR 97224 WASHINGTON COUNTY * _ OR.DEPT.OF ENERGY(Poweveies in Area) !OREGON DEPT.OF TRANS.(ODOT) Dept.of Land Use&Transp. Bonneville Power Administration Aeronautics Division(Monopole Towers) 155 N.First Avenue _CITY OF LAKE OSWEGO * Routing TTRC–Attn: Renae Ferrera Tom Highland,Planning Suite 350,MS 13 Planning Director PO Box 3621 3040 25th Street,SE Hillsboro,OR 97124 PO Box 369 Portland,OR 97208-3621 Salem,OR 97310 _Brent Curtis(CPA) Lake Oswego,OR 97034 _Gregg Leion(CPA) OR.DEPT.OF ENVIRON.QUALITY(DEQ) ODOT,REGION 1 * _Anne LaMountain(IGANRB) _CITY OF PORTLAND (Notify for Wetlands and Potential Environmental Impacts) _Sonya Kazen,Development Review Coordinator _Phil Healy(IGA/URB) David Knowles,Planning Bureau Dir Regional Administrator _Carl Toland, Right-of-Way Section(Vacations) _Steve Conway(General Apps.) Portland Building 106,Rm. 1002 2020 SW Fourth Avenue,Suite 400 123 NW Flanders Sr.Cartographer,ceeacn,r,r. 1120 SW Fifth Avenue Portland,OR 97201-4987 Portland,OR 97209-4037 Jim Nims(ZCA)MS 15 Portland,OR 97204 _Doria Mateja(ZcA)MS 14 ✓WCCCA(911)(Monopole Towers) _ODOT,REGION 1 -DISTRICT 2A Dave Austin Jane Estes,Perme Specialist 17911 NW Evergreen Parkway 5440 SW Westgate Drive,Suite 350 Beaverton,OR 97006 Portland,OR 97221-2414 UTILITY PROVIDERS AND SPECIAL AGENCIES _PORTLAND WESTERN R/R,BURLINGTON NORTHERN/SANTA FE RJR,OREGON ELECTRIC R/R(Burlington Northern/Santa Fe R/R Predecessor) Robert I. Melbo,President&General Manager 110 W. 10th Avenue Albany,OR 97321 / —SOUTHERN PACIFIC TRANS.CO.RJR _METRO AREA COMMUNICATIONS _/AT&T CABLE —TRI-MET TRANSIT DVLPMT. Clifford C.Cabe,Construction Engineer Debra Palmer(Annexations only) Pat McGann (If Project is Within V.Mile of A Transit Route) 5424 SE McLoughlin Boulevard Twin Oaks Technology Center 14200 SW Brigadoon Court Ben Baldwin,Project Planner Portland,OR 97232 1815 NW 169th Place,S-6020 Beaverton,OR 97005 710 NE Holladay Street Beaverton,OR 97006-4886 /Portland,OR 97232 yLPORTLAND GENERAL ELECTRIC ✓NW NATURAL GAS COMPANY /VERIZON ✓ QWEST COMMUNICATIONS Jim VanKleek,Svc.Design Consultant Scott Palmer,Engineering Coord. Ken Perdue,Engineering Jeri Cella,Engineering 9480 SW Boeckman Road 220 NW Second Avenue PO Box 1100 8021 SW Capitol Hill Rd,Rm 110 Wilsonville,OR 97070 Portland,OR 97209-3991 Beaverton,OR 97075-1100 Portland,OR 97219 _TIGARD/TUALATIN SCHOOL DIST.#23J_BEAVERTON SCHOOL DIST.#48 _ AT&T CABLE(errs Eaoaysuaoo) Marsha Butler,Administrative Offices Jan Youngquist,Demographics&Planning Dept. Diana Carpenter 6960 SW Sandburg Street 16550 SW Merlo Road 3500 SW Bond Street Tigard,OR 97223-8039 Beaverton,OR 97006-5152 Portland,OR 97232 * INDICATES AUTOMATIC NOTIFICATION IN COMPLIANCE WITH INTERGOVERNMENTAL AGREEMENT IF WITHIN 500' OF THE SUBJECT PROPERTY FOR ANY/ALL CITY PROJECTS(Project Planner Is Responsible For Indicating Parties To Notify). h Ipatty\masters\Request For Comments Notification List 2.doc (Revised: 8-Mar-02) MAILING RECORDS AFFIDAVIT OF MAILING CITY OF TIGARD Community Development Shaping/7 Better Community I, Patricia L. Lunsford, being first duly sworn/affirm, on oath depose and say that I am a Senior Administrative SpeciaJzstfor the City of Tigard, Washington County, Oregon and that I served the following: (ChecF.,wrote Ba,,sl Below) © NOTICE OF DECISION FOR: SDR2002-00010/CINGULAR COMMUNICATIONS MONOPOLE TOWER #2 ❑ AMENDED NOTICE (File No./Name Reference) ® City of Tigard Planning Director A copy of the said notice being hereto attached, marked Exhibit"A", and by reference made a part hereof, was mailed to each named person(s) at the address(s) shown on the attached list(s), marked Exhibit"B", and by reference made a part hereof, on August 8,2002,and deposited in the United States Mail on August 8,2002, postage prepaid. . AJ -e .• a a tara").7 (Person that Presared Notice) Sca/e±:OF OrAVGON ) County of Washington )ss. City of Tigard ) �� Subscribed and sworn/affirmed before me on the / day of it _ -,_ , 2002. OFFICIAL SEAL H ; DIANE M JELDERKS NCTARY PUBLIC OREGON �� COMMISSION NO.326578 04 1- 1 drL MY COMMISSION EXPIRES SEPT.07,2003 ROTA Y PUBLIC OF ORE s • My Commission Expir• : EXHIBIT NOTICE OF TYPE II DECISION SITE DEVELOPMENT REVIEW (SDR) 2002-00010 -Ise CITY OF TIGARD Community(Development CINGULAR COMMUNICATIONS MONOPOLE TOWER #2 Shaping a Better Community 120 DAYS = 11/5/2002 SECTION I. APPLICATION SUMMARY FILE NAME: CINGULAR COMMUNICATIONS MONOPOLE TOWER #2 CASE NOS.: Site Development Review (SDR) SDR2002-00010 PROPOSAL: The applicant is proposing to construct a 100-foot monopole tower for telecommunications service. The associated accessory equipment will be placed within a fenced and landscaped enclosure. APPLICANT: Salmon PcS, Inc. OWNER: Clean Water Services 123 NE 31 Ave, Suite 240 155 N. First Avenue, Suite 270 Portland, OR 97232 Hillsboro, OR 97124 APPLICANT'S REP: Mericom Corporation Attn: Chris Tigh 2701 NW Vaughn Street, Suite 890 Portland, OR 97210 LOCATION: 16580 SW 85th Avenue; WCTM 2S113B0, Tax Lot 00600. The subject site is located within the Clean Water Services Sewer Treatment Plant, south of Durham Road. ZONE: I-P: Industrial Park District. The I-P zoning district provides appropriate locations for combining light manufacturing, office and small-scale commercial uses, e.g., restaurants, personal services and fitness centers, in a campus-like setting. Only those light industrial uses with no off-site impacts, e.g., noise, glare, odor, vibration, are permitted in the I-P zone. In addition to mandatory site development review, design and development standards in the I-P zone have been adopted to insure that developments will be well-integrated, attractively landscaped, and pedestrian-friendly. APPLICABLE REVIEW CRITERIA: Community Development Code Chapters 18.390, 18.530, 18.705, 18.745, 18.765, 18.795, 18.798 and 18.810. SECTION II . DECISION Notice is hereby given that the City of Tigard Community Development Director's designee has APPROVED the above Site Development Review request subject to certain conditions of approval. The findings and conclusions on which the decision is based are noted in the full decision, available at City Hall. THIS APPROVAL SHALL BE VALID FOR 18 MONTHS FROM THE EFFECTIVE DATE OF THIS DECISION. All documents and applicable criteria in the above-noted file are available for inspection at no cost or copies can be obtained for twenty-five cents (250 per page, or the current rate charged for copies at the time of the request. SECTION III. PROCEDURE AND APPEAL INFORMATION Notice: Notice mailed to: X The applicant and owners X Owner of record within the required distance X Affected government agencies Final Decision: THIS DECISION IS FINAL ON AUGUST 8, 2002 AND BECOMES EFFECTIVE ON AUGUST 23, 2002 UNLESS AN APPEAL IS FILED. Apeaal: The Director's Decision is final on the date that it is mailed. All persons entitled to notice or who are otherwise adversely affected or aggrieved by the decision as provided in Section 18.390.040.G.1 may appeal this decision in accordance with Section 18.390.040.G.2 of the Tigard Community Development Code which provides that a written appeal together with the required fee shall be filed with the Director within ten (10) business days of the date the Notice of Decision was mailed. The appeal fee schedule and forms are available from the Planning Division of Tigard City Hall, 13125 SW Hall Boulevard, Tigard, Oregon 97223. Unless the applicant is the appellant, the hearing on an appeal from the Director's Decision shall be confined to the specific issues identified in the written comments submitted by the parties during the comment period. Additional evidence concerning issues properly raised in the Notice of Appeal may be submitted by any party during the appeal hearing, subject to any additional rules of procedure that may be adopted from time to time by the appellate body. I THE DEADLINE FOR FILING AN APPEAL IS 5:00 PM ON AUGUST 22, 2002. Questions: For further information please contact the Planning Division Staff Planner, Morgan Tracy at (503) 639-4171 , Tigard City Hall, 13125 SW Hall Boulevard, Tigard, Oregon 97223. • Inu.nu// li ta►-rag'il oom I -—'''6". �'•� n�ng=_.,�.fit �. 'sME_ _,:�J■ ,..:. ice, ��44►.E ♦ ♦ I,Q M= it *.t. ,,iVqi� ' /O NIT 2:011x/ VICINITY MAP b'♦ mw a*-��1�.:IAA/I i X11 Wm■ ?fg,19". sjC;; -;;:u _r• 2 11-=� 1111 111■I 1111111nu1 „� — SDR2DD2-000 D i ./n i g_' 121 ii°UI'l i��m111111111=■ L � fi� 1fiaff: 13ae" I* MONOPOLE h CINGULAR WIRELESS \ L TOWER \I @ DURHAM TREATMENT of4 PLANT , oda- 1/1 U10 / / .` I. 6. . g� . IIIYllllr• � 11 . I•m m J� a..,. ••.... . � 47:114 itodearilsaiiiiitT=I avernsard will.:oyrf w# UM W.W.I dyr A •1 X4 11 ior I I _a � , • i _...,,,,,,,di.„..„..,....4., ...,. ,,, , 0‘0'-:-.:,,,,-4,4,-,.., • . III,. _,"‘ . 1" a�, , , 7 , ,4,. . it \___\ n 7- --- /-"- ''': .:i=, 6 '4/74r W- O ar.a. O a.{/paEO si1E cw A, CITY OF TIGARD t sDR2oo2.00010 _ BITE PLAN N CINGULAR WIRELESS MONOPOLE TOWER (Map Is not to scale) __ -- - -- ----- - EXHIBIT 8 2S112CC-01300 2S113BA-00600 ADDINGTON JAMES P&YVONNE L CLEAN WANE ERVICES 17000 SW BROOKMAN RD 155 N FIRS VE STE 270 PO BOX 545 HILLSB 0,0 7124 SHERWOOD,OR 97140 2S112CC-07100 2S113B0-00600 ALEXANDER JOSEPH F&SALLY H CLEAN W T SERVICES 15785 SW 82ND AVE 155 N FIR VE STE 270 TIGARD,OR 97224 HILLSB 0,0 97124 2S 112CC-14500 2S114AA-00400 BARKER BRUCE D&SUSAN L CLEAN WAT SERVICES 20700 COUGAR HILLS LN 155 N Fl AVE STE 270 HILLSBORO,OR 97123 HILLSBO , 97124 2S11380-00200 2S114AA-00500 BARTLETT EDWARD ALONZO TRUST CLEAN WATE SERVICES BY KENNETH L BAKER 155 N FIR T VE STE 270 10121 SE SUNNYSIDE RD STE 325 HILLSBO , R 97124 CLACKAMAS,OR 97015 2S 112CC-05200 2S 114AA-00600 BAUSTIEN WILLIAM S&KRISTEN B CLEAN W TER SERVICES 8070 SW BOND ST 155 N T AVE STE 270 TIGARD,OR 97224 HILLSB O,OR 97124 2S112CC-01800 2S114AD-00200 BENJAMIN JUDITH A CLEAN W T SERVICES 15965 SW 81ST CT 155 N FIRS VE STE 270 TIGARD,OR 97224 HILLSBOR , 97124 2S 112CC-01801 2S 114AD-00100 BOWEN RICHARD L CLEAN T R SERVICES BY FARMERS INS AGENCY 155 N FIR VE STE 270 2023 LLOYD CENTER HILLSBO O, R 97124 PORTLAND,OR 97232 2S111 DD-12000 2S114AD-00300 BRAUER JOEL J AND CLEAN W T R SERVICES ROBERTA L 155 N FIRS AVE STE 270 8550 SW AVON ST HILLSBO , R 97124 TIGARD,OR 97224 2S111DD-10700 2511 C-01 BREWER JOSEPH A III&STEPHANIE COLLI JOYCE 8610 SW STRATFORD CT 8255 S NECA ST TIGARD,OR 97224 TUA IN,OR 97062 2S114DA-00100 2S112CC-01400 CLEAN WATER SERVICES COL N JOYCE C 155 N FIRST AVE STE 270 825 SENECA ST HILLSBORO,OR 97124 TUALATI ,OR 97062 2S112CC-06600 2S112CC-05500 CROUSE RICHARD L ESPOSITO MICHAEL F&SHARON M 8085 SW BOND ST 8132 SW BOND ST TIGARD,OR 97224 TIGARD,OR 97224 2S112CC-07200 2S112CC-00200 DALLAS ERIC G& GAGE DOROTHY DARLENE CARRIE M GAGE M A ABRECHT M G 15773 SW 82ND AVE 8000 SW 54TH AVE TIGARD,OR 97224 PORTLAND,OR 97219 2S 113B0-02200 2S11100-10000 DURHAM CITY OF GARCIA JOSE C& PO BOX 23483 BAILON ROMAN DURHAM,OR 97281 8635 SW STRATFORD CT TIGARD,OR 97224 2S 113BD-00300 2S 112CC-05000 DURHAM CITY OF HAGAN ELIZABETH R TRUSTEE 17160 SW UPR BOONES FY RD 8020 SW BOND ST TIGARD,OR 97223 TIGARD,OR 97224 2S 113CB-07700 2S112CC-14600 DURHAM CITY OF HOFFART FAMILY PROPERTIES LLC PO BOX 23483 4632 SW VERMONT ST DURHAM,OR 97281 PORTLAND,OR 97219 2S113BD-0 400 25112 -1010 DU CITY OF HOFFA AMILY PROPERTIES LLC PO BO 483 4632 5 V MONT ST DUR AM,0 97281 PORTLAND,OR 97219 2S113B0-00400 2S112C -1 0 DURHAM I LLC HOFFA AMILY PROPERTIES LLC 8100 SW DURHAM RD 4632 S RMONT ST TIGARD,OR 97224 PORTLAND,OR 97219 2S1 3B0-00500 2S112CC-13900 DUR I LLC HOFF T AMILY PROPERTIES LLC 8100 URHAM RD 4632 SW RMONT ST TIGA D,O 97244 PORT ND, R 97219 2S1. 6400 2CC 2S112CC-15400 DUR FILM SCHOOL PARK OWNERS OF HOF T AMILY PROPERTIES LLC LOT 11 6 4632 SW RMONT ST , 0 PORT ND,OR 97219 25 14 2CC-16300 2S 112CC-14800 DUR SCHOOL PARK OWNERS OF HOF F T ERBERT J LOT 5- 4632 S ERMONT ST PORT OR 97219 2S112CC-15100 2S112CC-15600 HOFFART HERBERT J HOFFART ERBERT J 4632 S ERMONT ST 4632 S ERMONT ST PORT ,OR 97219 PORT OR 97219 2S112CC-14700 2S112CC-16000 HOFFA ERBERT J HOFFART HERBERT J 4632 SW MONT ST 4632 SW ERMONT ST PORTLA D, R 97219 PORT e R 97219 2S112CC-15300 2S112CC-15700 HOFFrszz ERBE RTJ HOFFARTT4ERBERTJ 4632 SMONT ST 4632 SWRMONT 5T PORT ,OR 97219 PORT D,OR 97219 2S112CC-15000. 2S112CC-16100 HOFFAR RBERT J HOFFART H RBERT J 4632 SW V ONT ST 4632 S RMONT ST PORTLAND,OR 97219 PORT OR 97219 2S 112CC-15200 2S112CC-16200 HOFFARTBERTJ HOFF R HERBERT J 4632 SW V�4p�ONT ST 4632 S VERMONT ST PORTLAND,OR 97219 PORT N ,OR 97219 2S112CC-14100 2S111DD-07500 HOFFART HERBERT J HORNE BRIAN D/CAROLYN K 4632 SVIXRMONT ST 8515 SW AVON ST PORT D, R 97219 TIGARD,OR 97224 2S 112CC-15900 2S 111 DD-10300 HOFFART ERBERT J HUBER MICHAEL LEE 4632 S ERMONT ST 1170 OXFORD DR PORT ,OR 97219 LAKE OSWEGO,OR 97034 2S112CC-14900 2511100-10400 HOFFA ERBERT J HUTCHINSON MARK S& 4632 SW MONT ST MIDSON CLARE N PORTLAND,OR 97219 8550 SW STRATFORD CT TIGARD,OR 97224 2S112CC-14200 2S11100-10100 HOFFA Ty1ERBERT J JUNGKIND DEBORAH MARGARET& 4632 S ��"�RMONT ST JUNGLIND ROSE MARIE PORT ND,OR 97219 10820 SW SUMMER LAKE DR TIGARD,OR 97223 2S112CC-14000 2S112CC-06200 HOFF T ERBERT J JUNGWIRTH CAROL JENSEN 4632 SV ERMONT ST 15921 SW 81ST CT PORT OR 97219 TIGARD,OR 97224 2S112CC-05300 2S112CC-06100 KAELIN KRISTOFER R& NICOLICH CINDY L REBECCA 15943 SW 81ST CT 8090 SW BOND ST PORTLAND,OR 97224 TIGARD,OR 97224 2S 112CC-06300 2S1 11 DD-12300 KEEFER DAN M&TYLER A NIELSEN MARY C 15889 SW 81ST CT PO BOX 1811 TIGARD,OR 97224 LAKE OSWEGO,OR 97035 2S112CC-05100 25111 DD-12100 KIRKPATRICK DEAN L& O'DONNELL CAROLYN M CHRISTINA L 8538 SW AVON 8050 SW BOND ST TIGARD,OR 97224 TIGARD,OR 97224 2S112CC-01600 2S112CC-14400 KNEBEL WERNER&INGE B OLSON DENNIS M& 7483 SW ASHFORD ST MARILYN J TIGARD,OR 97224 18820 SW TUALATA AVE LAKE OSWEGO,OR 97035 2S 111 DD-11900 2S112CC-14300 KNUDSON ROSALIE J OLSON RONALD D& 8602 SW AVON ST LINDA A TIGARD,OR 97224 3297 SW LAKE GROVE AVE LAKE OSWEGO,OR 97035 2S 112CC-06500 2S 113BA-00400 LAMBING SCOTT M& OPUS NORTHWEST LLC ADRIENNE DORSCH 915 118TH AVE SE STE 300 15845 SW 81ST CT BELLEVUE,WA 98005 TIGARD,OR 97224 2S112CC-06900 2S112CC-05600 LEE DAVID M&LORI R PATEL RAJENDRA J 8210 SW PATTI LN 8154 SW BOND ST TIGARD,OR 97224 TIGARD,OR 97224 2S112CC-15500 2S112CC-07000 MCCLURE ELISE PORTER TAU&LISA R 7726 21ST AVE NE 8222 SW PATTI LN SEATTLE,WA 98115 TIGARD,OR 97224 2S 111 DD-12200 2S 112CC-05800 MITCHELL MICHAEL G&MARGARET E ROGERS CYNTHIA R 8526 SW AVON ST 15932 SW 81ST CT TIGARD,OR 97224 TIGARD,OR 97224 2S 112CC-05900 2S1 11 DD-00201 NEWBERRY MICHAEL H ROSEHILL INVESTMENTS LLC 15954 SW 81ST CT 2001 SIXTH AVE STE 2300 TIGARD,OR 97224 SEATTLE,WA 98121 2S112CC-01701 2S 113BA-00700 SATTLER MURIEL I&EDWARD J TRS TAYLOR MARY L QUALIFIED 13360 SW MORGAN RD PERSONAL RESIDENCE TRUST NO.1 SHERWOOD,OR 97140 16565 SW UPPER BOONES FERRY RD TIGARD,OR 97224 2S112C -01700 2S112CC-01100 SATTLE RIEL I&EDWARD J TRS TIGARD FRIENDS CHURCH 13360 S GAN RD 7130 SW BEVELAND SHER 00D,OR 97140 TIGARD,OR 97223 2S 112CC-06000 2S 113BA-00401 SAYLER DEBORAH A TIGARD SCHOOL DISTRICT 13500 SW PACIFIC HWY#442 NO 23J TIGARD,OR 97223 6960 SW SANDBURG ST TIGARD,OR 97223 2S 114AA-00100 2S 113BA-00500 SCHOOL DISTRICT 23J TIGARD-TUALATIN SCHOOL 13137 SW PACIFIC HWY DISTRICT 23J TIGARD,OR 97223 ATTN:BUSINESS MANAGER 6960 SW SANDBURG ST TIGARD,OR 97223 2S113B0-00 0 2S111DD-10800 SCH !STRICT NO 23J TUMBLESON SCOTT V& 13137 PACIFIC HWY DANETTE M TIGA D,0 97123 8630 SW STRATFORD CT TIGARD,OR 97224 2S114AA-00300 2S112CC-05700 SHIPMAN W H LIMITED VICKREY L EDWARD BY NORRIS&STEVENS 15910 SW 81ST CT 520 SW 6TH AVE#400 TIGARD,OR 97224 PORTLAND,OR 2S114AA-00 0 2S112CC-01804 SHIP H LIMITED WATT DOUGLAS A&KATIE S BY NO IS&STEVENS 15987 SW 81ST CT 520 S 6 AVE#400 TIGARD,OR 97224 POR ND,OR 2S 112CC-06400 2S112CC-05400 SHUGAR ALLAN L WEIJO RICHARD 0 TR& 15867 SW 81ST CT WEIJO SHARON K TR TIGARD,OR 97223 8110 SW BOND TIGARD,OR 97224 2S11100.09900 2S 111 DD-10600 SMITH BARRY F& WYSS SCOTT C AND PAMELA J ELMER LYNN T 8590 SW STRATFORD CT 8655 SW STRATFORD CT TIGARD,OR 97224 TIGARD,OR 97223 2S111 DD-10200 25111 DD-10500 SNYDER DAN A&DARLENE A YOUNG BRUCE H&WANDA E 8585 SW STRATFORD CT 8570 SW STRATFORD CT TIGARD,OR 97224 TIGARD,OR 97224 Jack Biethan 11023 SW Summerfield Drive, #4 Tigard, OR 97224 Kristen Miller 8940 SW Edgewood Street Tigard, OR 97223 Paul Owen 10335 SW Highland Drive Tigard, OR 97224 Louise Fronville 15760 SW Oak Meadow Lane Tigard, OR 97224 Tim Esav PO Box 230695 Tigard, OR 97281 Nathan and Ann Murdock PO Box 231265 Tigard, OR 97281 Ross Sundberg 16382 SW 104th Avenue Tigard, OR 97224 Brian Wegener 9830 SW Kimberly Drive Tigard, OR 97224 CITY OF TIGARD - SOUTH CIT SUBCOMMITTEE (pg. I of I) (i:\curpin\setup\labels\CIT South.doc) UPDATED: April 18, 2002 . Y AFFIDAVIT OF MAILING ...A_Ai CITY OF TGARD Community'Development Shaping Better Community I, Patricia L. Luns{ord, being first duly sworn/affirm, on oath depose and say that I am a Senior Administrative Specialist for the City of Tigard;Washington County, Oregon and that I served the following: (Check Appropriate Box(s)Below) E3 NOTICE OF PENDING LAND USE APPLICATION FOR: SDR2002-00010/CINGULAR WIRELESS MONOPOLE TOWER ❑ AMENDED NOTICE (File No/Name Reference) ® City of Tigard Planning Director A copy of the said notice being hereto attached, marked Exhibit"A", and by reference made a part hereof, was mailed to each named person(s) at the address(s) shown on the attached list(s), marked Exhibit"D", and by reference made a part hereof, on July 8,2002, and deposited in the United States Mail on July 8,2002, postage prepaid. 2/ j f I � •'4.(~/ , ' C a . ier,-,. .- (Person that Pre ared Notice) . i STATE of okEGOX ) County of Washington )ss. City of Tigard ) Subscribed and sworn/affirmed before me on the 131 day of t,(i1.tQ � , 2002. `,., OFFICIAL SEAL .R 'l? DIANE M JELDERKS 1~i; NOTARY PUBLINO.326 78 �� ( COMMISSION NOS SEPT.MY COMMISSION EXPIRES SEP 07,2003 :�� N A U COFO r My Commission Ex I es: 9/7 �3 EMIT If NOTICE TO MORTGAGEE, LIENHOLDER,VENDOR OR SELLER: THE TIGARD DEVELOPMENT CODE REQUIRES THAT IF YOU RECEIVE THIS NOTICE,IT SHALL BE PROMPTLY FORWARDED TO THE PURCHASER. NOTICE OF PENDING LAND USE APPLICATION *Is SITE DEVELOPMENT REVIEW CITY OF OF TIGARD Community Development Shaping Better Community DATE OF NOTICE: July 8, 2002 FILE NUMBER: SITE DEVELOPMENT REVIEW (SDR) 2002-00010 Type H Land Use Application FILE NAME: CINGULAR WIRELESS MONOPOLE TOWER @ DURHAM TREATMENT PLANT PROPOSAL: The applicant is requesting Site Development Review approval to construct a 100-foot monopole tower for telecommunications service. The associated accessory equipment will be placed within a fenced and landscaped enclosure. ZONE: I-P: Industrial Park District. The I-P zoning district provides appropriate locations for combining light manufacturing, office and small-scale commercial uses, e.g., restaurants, personal services and fitness centers, in a campus-like setting. Only those light industrial uses with no off-site impacts, e.g., noise, glare, odor, vibration, are permitted in the I-P zone. In addition to mandatory site development review, design and development standards in the I-P zone have been adopted to insure that developments will be well-integrated, attractively landscaped, and pedestrian-friendly. APPLICABLE REVIEW CRITERIA: Community Development Code Chapters 18.390, 18.530, 18.705, 18.745, 18.765, 18.795, 18.798 and 18.810. LOCATION: 16580 SW 85th Avenue; WCTM 2S113B0, Tax Lot 600. YOUR RIGHT TO PROVIDE WRITTEN COMMENTS: Prior to the City making any decision on the Application, you are hereby provided a fourteen (14) day period to submit written comments on the application to the City. THE FOURTEEN (14) DAY PERIOD ENDS AT 5:00 PM ON JULY 22, 2002. All comments should be directed to Morgan Tracy, Associate Planner in the Planning Division at the City of Tigard, 13125 SW Hall Boulevard, Tigard, Oregon 97223. You may reach the City of Tigard by telephone at (503) 639-4171. ALL COMMENTS MUST BE RECEIVED BY THE CITY OF TIGARD IN WRITING PRIOR TO 5:00 PM ON THE DATE SPECIFIED ABOVE IN ORDER FOR YOUR COMMENTS TO BE CONSIDERED IN THE DECISION MAKING PROCESS THE CITY OF TIGARD APPRECIATES RECEIVING COMMENTS AND VALUES YOUR INPUT. COMMENTS WILL BE CONSIDERED AND ADDRESSED WITHIN THE NOTICE OF DECISION. A DECISION ON THIS ISSUE IS TENTATIVELY SCHEDULED FOR AUGUST 19, 2002. IF YOU PROVIDE COMMENTS, YOU WILL BE SENT A COPY OF THE FULL DECISION ONCE IT HAS BEEN RENDERED. WRITTEN COMMENTS WILL BECOME A PART OF THE PERMANENT PUBLIC RECORD AND SHALL CONTAIN THE FOLLOWING INFORMATION: • Address the specific "Applicable Review Criteria" described in the section above or any other criteria believed to be applicable to this proposal; • Raise any issues and/or concerns believed to be important with sufficient evidence to allow the City to provide a response; • Comments that provide the basis for an appeal to the Tigard Hearings Officer must address the relevant approval criteria with sufficient specificity on that issue. Failure of any party to address the relevant approval criteria with sufficient specificity may preclude subsequent appeals to the Land Use Board of Appeals or Circuit Court on that issue. Specific findings directed at the relevant approval criteria are what constitute relevant evidence. AFTER THE 14 DAY COMMENT PERIOD CLOSES, THE DIRECTOR SHALL ISSUE A TYPE II ADMINISTRATIVE DECISION. THE DIRECTOR'S DECISION SHALL BE MAILED TO THE APPLICANT AND TO OWNERS OF RECORD OF PROPERTY LOCATED WITHIN 500 FEET OF THE SUBJECT SITE, AND TO ANYONE ELSE WHO SUBMITTED WRITTEN COMMENTS OR WHO IS OTHERWISE ENTITLED TO NOTICE. THE DIRECTOR'S DECISION SHALL ADDRESS ALL OF THE RELEVANT APPROVAL CRITERIA. BASED UPON THE CRITERIA AND THE FACTS CONTAINED WITHIN THE RECORD, THE DIRECTOR SHALL APPROVE, APPROVE WITH CONDITIONS OR DENY THE REQUESTED PERMIT OR ACTION. SUMMARY OF THE DECISION-MAKING PROCESS: . The application is accepted by the City . Notice is sent to property owners of record within 500 feet of the proposed development area allowing a 14-day written comment period. . The application is reviewed by City Staff and affected agencies. . City Staff issues a written decision. . Notice of the decision is sent to the Applicant and all owners or contract purchasers of record of the site; all owners of record of property located within 500 feet of the site, as shown on the most recent property tax assessment roll; any City-recognized neighborhood group whose boundaries include the site; and any governmental agency which is entitled to notice under an intergovernmental agreement entered into with the City which includes provision for such notice or anyone who is otherwise entitled to such notice. INFORMATION/EVIDENCE AVAILABLE FOR REVIEW: The application, written comments and supporting documents relied upon by the Director to make this decision are contained within the record and are available for public review at the City of Tigard Community Development Department. Copies of these items may be obtained at a cost of $.25 per page or the current rate charged for this service. Questions regarding this application should be directed to the Planning Staff indicated on the first page of this Notice under the section titled "Your Right to Provide Written Comments." ,�iipi i• ,.. 111111111111 _ �r - CITY of TIGARD Cr"N cl w= N f �J ■ ■ 1111,E 8111,•'41� \ 0= E. �}M MN 11'= VICINITY MAP ■ — °x!11111' 11111111/1 111111 !!;I 11�= 111111 111 1�►t'1 i '�_-.:_1�11_nallim SDR2002 00010 . Oita �� CINGULAR WIRELESS ��■Illllr�l�� o Illm.�'r BIi W nii-1. 1— MONOPOLE TOWER @ DURHAM TREATMENT IN 111 alt, e 4 PLANT II N I milill. III _'\ \ •r• 4,.. _ , ,,I. k.11111111111111. It ( ..„,.. , ., P446 MET"MIN P II .. .■IIIIIIIII1B �„�„w Wrifflia 111 N Arwq. �1-�_ 000 eillaill Lam,12,44.4.4∎Note a 1.161r.WM FAH AT Aillitr LXIII? ' 2S112CC-01300 2S 113BA-00600 ADDINGTON JAMES P&YVONNE L CLEAN WATE ERVICES 17000 SW BROOKMAN RD 155 N FIRS VE STE 270 PO BOX 545 HILLSB 0,0 7124 SHERWOOD,OR 97140 2S112CC-07100 2S 113B0-00600 ALEXANDER JOSEPH F&SALLY H CLEAN W T SERVICES 15785 SW 82ND AVE 155 N FIRS VE STE 270 TIGARD,OR 97224 HILLSB 0,0 97124 2S112CC-14500 2S 114AA-00400 BARKER BRUCE D&SUSAN L CLEAN WAT SERVICES 20700 COUGAR HILLS LN 155 N Fl AVE STE 270 HILLSBORO,OR 97123 HILLSBO , 97124 2S113BD-00200 2S114AA-00500 BARTLETT EDWARD ALONZO TRUST CLEAN WATE SERVICES BY KENNETH L BAKER 155 N FIR T VE STE 270 10121 SE SUNNYSIDE RD STE 325 HILLSBO , R 97124 CLACKAMAS,OR 97015 2S 112CC-05200 2S 114AA-00600 BAUSTIEN WILLIAM S&KRISTEN B CLEAN W TER SERVICES 8070 SW BOND ST 155 N T AVE STE 270 TIGARD,OR 97224 HILLSB O,OR 97124 2S112CC-01800 2S114AD-00200 BENJAMIN JUDITH A CLEAN W T SERVICES 15965 SW 81ST CT 155 N FIRS VE STE 270 TIGARD,OR 97224 HILLSBOR , 97124 2S112CC-01801 2S114AD-00100 BOWEN RICHARD L CLEAN T R SERVICES BY FARMERS INS AGENCY 155 N FIR VE STE 270 2023 LLOYD CENTER HILLSBO O, R 97124 PORTLAND,OR 97232 2S 111 DD-12000 2S 114AD-00300 BRAUER JOEL J AND CLEAN T R SERVICES ROBERTA L 155 N FIRS AVE STE 270 8550 SW AVON ST HILLSBO , R 97124 TIGARD,OR 97224 2S111DD-10700 2511 C-0 BREWER JOSEPH A III&STEPHANIE COLLI JOYCE 8610 SW STRATFORD CT 8255 S NECA ST TIGARD,OR 97224 TUALA IN,OR 97062 2S114DA-00100 2S 112CC-01400 CLEAN WATER SERVICES COL N JOYCE C 155 N FIRST AVE STE 270 825 SENECA ST HILLSBORO,OR 97124 TUALATI ,OR 97062 25112CC-06600 2S112CC-05500 CROUSE RICHARD L ESPOSITO MICHAEL F&SHARON M 8085 SW BOND ST 8132 SW BOND ST TIGARD,OR 97224 TIGARD,OR 97224 2S112CC-07200 2S112CC-00200 DALLAS ERIC G& GAGE DOROTHY DARLENE CARRIE M GAGE M A ABRECHT M G 15773 SW 82ND AVE 8000 SW 54TH AVE TIGARD,OR 97224 PORTLAND,OR 97219 2S113B0-02200 2S111DD-10000 DURHAM CITY OF GARCIA JOSE C& PO BOX 23483 BAILON ROMAN DURHAM,OR 97281 8635 SW STRATFORD CT TIGARD,OR 97224 2S113BD-00300 25112CC-05000 DURHAM CITY OF HAGAN ELIZABETH R TRUSTEE 17160 SW UPR BOONES FY RD 8020 SW BOND ST TIGARD,OR 97223 TIGARD,OR 97224 26113CB-07700 2S112CC-14600 DURHAM CITY OF HOFFART FAMILY PROPERTIES LLC PO BOX 23483 4632 SW VERMONT ST DURHAM,OR 97281 PORTLAND,OR 97219 2S113B0-0 400 25112 B-10110 DU CITY OF HOFFA" AMILY PROPERTIES LLC PO BO 483 4632 5 ,V.-MONT ST DUR AM,0 97281 PORTLAND,OR 97219 2S11380-00400 2S112C -1 0 DURHAM I LLC HOFFA AMILY PROPERTIES LLC 8100 SW DURHAM RD 4632 S RMONT ST TIGARD,OR 97224 PORTLAND,OR 97219 2S1 3B0-00500 2S112CC-13900 DUR I LLC HOFF T AMILY PROPERTIES LLC 8100 URHAM RD 4632 SW RMONT ST TIGA D,O 97244 PORT ND, R 97219 2S1. 2�CC�6400 2S112CC-15400 DUR F1j�M,SCHOOL PARK OWNERS OF HOFP T AMILY PROPERTIES LLC LOT 11 6 4632 SW RMONT ST , 0 PORT ND,OR 97219 2S142CC-16300 2S112CC-14800 DUR- SCHOOL PARK OWNERS OF HOF . T ERBERT J LOT 5- 4632 S ERMONT ST PORT OR 97219 2S112CC-15100 2S112CC-15600 HOFFART HERBERT J HOFFART ERBERT J 4632 S ERMONT ST 4632 S ERMONT ST PORT ,OR 97219 PORT OR 97219 2S112CC-14700 2S112CC-16000 HOFFA RBERT J HOFFART HERBERT J 4632 SW MONT ST 4632 SW,'ftRMONT ST PORTLA D, R 97219 PORT 9 R 97219 2S112CC-15300 2S112CC-15700 HOFFA TERBERTJ HOFFART ERBERT J 4632 S MONT ST 4632 SW RMONT ST PORT ND,OR 97219 PORT LAND,'OR 97219 2S 112CC-15000. 2S112CC-16100 HOFFAR RBERT J HOFFART HERBERT J 4632 SW V ONT ST 4632 S RMONT ST PORTLAND,OR 97219 PORT OR 97219 2S112CC-15200 2S112CC-16200 HOFFARTBERT J HOFF R HERBERT J 4632 SW V ONT ST 4632 S VERMONT ST PORTLAND,OR 97219 PORT N ,OR 97219 2S112CC-14100 2S 111 DD-07500 HOFFART HERBERT J HORNE BRIAN D/CAROLYN K 4632 SYvRMONT ST 8515 SW AVON ST PORT D, R 97219 TIGARD,OR 97224 2S112CC-15900 2S 111 DD-10300 HOFFART�1ERBERT J HUBER MICHAEL LEE 4632 S ERMONT ST 1170 OXFORD DR PORT OR 97219 LAKE OSWEGO,OR 97034 2S112CC-14900 2S111DD-10400 HOFFA ERBERT J HUTCHINSON MARK S& 4632 SW MONT ST MIDSON CLARE N PORTLAND,OR 97219 8550 SW STRATFORD CT TIGARD,OR 97224 2S112CC-14200 2S111DD-10100 HOFFAL T ERBERT J JUNGKIND DEBORAH MARGARET& 4632 S RMONT ST JUNGLIND ROSE MARIE PORT ND,OR 97219 10820 SW SUMMER LAKE DR TIGARD,OR 97223 2S112CC-14000 2S112CC-06200 HOFF T ERBERT J JUNGWIRTH CAROL JENSEN 4632 Iii ST 15921 SW 81ST CT PORT ,OR 97219 TIGARD,OR 97224 2S112CC-05300 2S112CC-06100 KAELIN KRISTOFER R& NICOLICH CINDY L REBECCA 15943 SW 81ST CT 8090 SW BOND ST PORTLAND,OR 97224 TIGARD,OR 97224 2S112CC-06300 2S 111 DD-12300 KEEFER DAN M&TYLER A NIELSEN MARY C 15889 SW 81ST CT PO BOX 1811 TIGARD,OR 97224 LAKE OSWEGO,OR 97035 2S112CC-05100 2S111 DD-12100 KIRKPATRICK DEAN L& O'DONNELL CAROLYN M CHRISTINA L 8538 SW AVON 8050 SW BOND ST TIGARD,OR 97224 TIGARD,OR 97224 2S112CC-01600 2S 112CC-14400 KNEBEL WERNER&INGE B OLSON DENNIS M& 7483 SW ASHFORD ST MARILYN J TIGARD,OR 97224 18820 SW TUALATA AVE LAKE OSWEGO,OR 97035 2S111 DD-11900 2S112CC-14300 KNUDSON ROSALIE J OLSON RONALD D& 8602 SW AVON ST LINDA A TIGARD,OR 97224 3297 SW LAKE GROVE AVE LAKE OSWEGO,OR 97035 2S112CC-06500 2S 113BA-00400 LAMBING SCOTT M& OPUS NORTHWEST LLC ADRIENNE DORSCH 915 118TH AVE SE STE 300 15845 SW 81ST CT BELLEVUE,WA 98005 TIGARD,OR 97224 2S112CC-06900 2S112CC-05600 LEE DAVID M&LORI R PATEL RAJENDRA J 8210 SW PATTI LN 8154 SW BOND ST TIGARD,OR 97224 TIGARD,OR 97224 2S112CC-15500 2S112CC-07000 MCCLURE ELISE PORTER TAU&LISA R 7726 21ST AVE NE 8222 SW PATTI LN SEATTLE,WA 98115 TIGARD,OR 97224 2S 111 DD-12200 2S112CC-05800 MITCHELL MICHAEL G&MARGARET E ROGERS CYNTHIA R 8526 SW AVON ST 15932 SW 81ST CT TIGARD,OR 97224 TIGARD,OR 97224 2S 112CC-05900 2S1 11 DD-00201 NEWBERRY MICHAEL H ROSEHILL INVESTMENTS LLC 15954 SW 81ST CT 2001 SIXTH AVE STE 2300 TIGARD,OR 97224 SEATTLE,WA 98121 2S112CC-01701 2S113BA-00700 SATTLER MURIEL I&EDWARD J TRS TAYLOR MARY L QUALIFIED 13360 SW MORGAN RD PERSONAL RESIDENCE TRUST NO.1 SHERWOOD,OR 97140 16565 SW UPPER BOONES FERRY RD TIGARD,OR 97224 2S112C -01700 2S112CC-01100 SATTLE RIEL I&EDWARD J TRS TIGARD FRIENDS CHURCH 13360 S GAN RD 7130 SW BEVELAND SHER OOD,OR 97140 TIGARD,OR 97223 2S 112CC-06000 2S 113BA-00401 SAYLER DEBORAH A TIGARD SCHOOL DISTRICT 13500 SW PACIFIC HWY#442 NO 23J TIGARD,OR 97223 6960 SW SANDBURG ST TIGARD,OR 97223 2S114AA-00100 2S113BA-00500 SCHOOL DISTRICT 23J TIGARD-TUALATIN SCHOOL 13137 SW PACIFIC HWY DISTRICT 23J TIGARD,OR 97223 ATTN:BUSINESS MANAGER 6960 SW SANDBURG ST TIGARD,OR 97223 2S113B0-00 10 2S111DD-10800 SCH►• I(STRICT NO 23J TUMBLESON SCOTT V& 13137 •■ PACIFIC HWY DANETTE M TIGA-D,O' 97123 8630 SW STRATFORD CT TIGARD,OR 97224 2S 114AA-00300 2S 112CC-05700 SHIPMAN W H LIMITED VICKREY L EDWARD BY NORRIS&STEVENS 15910 SW 81ST CT 520 SW 6TH AVE#400 TIGARD,OR 97224 PORTLAND,OR 2S114AA-00 0 2S112CC-01804 SHIP H LIMITED WATT DOUGLAS A&KATIE S BY NO IS&STEVENS 15987 SW 81ST CT 520 S 6 AVE#400 TIGARD,OR 97224 POR ND,OR 25112CC-06400 2S112CC-05400 SHUGAR ALLAN L WEIJO RICHARD 0 TR& 15867 SW 81ST CT WEIJO SHARON K TR TIGARD,OR 97223 8110 SW BOND TIGARD,OR 97224 2S111 DD-09900 25111 DD-10600 SMITH BARRY F& WYSS SCOTT C AND PAMELA J ELMER LYNN T 8590 SW STRATFORD CT 8655 SW STRATFORD CT TIGARD,OR 97224 TIGARD,OR 97223 2S11100-10200 2S111DD-10500 SNYDER DAN A&DARLENE A YOUNG BRUCE H&WANDA E 8585 SW STRATFORD CT 8570 SW STRATFORD CT TIGARD,OR 97224 TIGARD,OR 97224 Jack Biethan 11023 SW Summerfield Drive, #4 Tigard, OR 97224 Kristen Miller 8940 SW Edgewood Street Tigard, OR 97223 Paul Owen 10335 SW Highland Drive Tigard, OR 97224 Louise Fronville 15760 SW Oak Meadow Lane Tigard, OR 97224 Tim Esav PO Box 230695 Tigard, OR 97281 Nathan and Ann Murdock PO Box 231265 Tigard, OR 97281 Ross Sundberg 16382 SW 104th Avenue Tigard, OR 97224 Brian Wegener 9830 SW Kimberly Drive Tigard, OR 97224 Salmon PCS, Inc. 123 NE 3rd Avenue, Suite 240 Portland, OR 97232 Mericom Corporation Attn: Chris Tigh 2701 NW Vaughn Street Portland, OR 97210 CITY OF TIGARD - SOUTH CIT SUBCOMMITTEE (pg. I of I) (i:\curpin\setup\labels\CIT South.doc) UPDATED: April 18, 2002 A AFFIDAVIT OF MAILING . . CITY OF TIGARD Community DeveCopment S6apingA Better Community I, Patricia L. Lunsford, being first duly sworn/affirm, on oath depose and say that I am a Senior Administrative Specialzstfor the City of7igard, Washington County, Oregon and that I served the following: {Cheek Appropriate Bons)Below; © NOTICE OF DECISION FOR: SDR2002-00010/CINGULAR COMMUNICATIONS MONOPOLE TOWER #2 ❑ AMENDED NOTICE (File No/Name Reference) ® City of Tigard Planning Director A copy of the said notice being hereto attached, marked Exhibit"A", and by reference made a part hereof, was mailed to each named person(s) at the address(s) shown on the attached list(s), marked Exhibit"B", and by reference made a part hereof, on August 8,2002,and deposited in the United States Mail on August 8,2002, postage prepaid. / / / A/. '.�� ill -/—f■% i f (P"Ttha • es- -d Noti -)J STATE OE OREGON ) County of Washington )s. City of Tigard- ) Subscribed and sworn/affirmed before me on the /3 day of , , 2002. I .rz---- OFFICIAL SEAL h:`,==•-•`• DIANE PA JELDERKS .'' ' NOTARY PUBLIC-OREGON COMMISSION NO.326578 MY COMMISSION EXPIRES SEPT.07,2003 .0.P�OF G .k.zr, My Commission ixpires: �77 Q3 n NOTICE OF TYPE II DECISION SITE DEVELOPMENT REVIEW (SDR) 2002-00010 ,1 CITY OF TIGARD CINGULAR COMMUNICATIONS MONOPOLE TOWER #2 Community Development Shaping,l Better Community 120 DAYS = 11/5/2002 SECTION I. APPLICATION SUMMARY FILE NAME: CINGULAR COMMUNICATIONS MONOPOLE TOWER #2 CASE NOS.: Site Development Review (SDR) SDR2002-00010 PROPOSAL: The applicant is proposing to construct a 100-foot monopole tower for telecommunications service. The associated accessory equipment will be placed within a fenced and landscaped enclosure. APPLICANT: Salmon PCS, Inc. OWNER: Clean Water Services 123 NE 3ru Ave, Suite 240 155 N. First Avenue, Suite 270 Portland, OR 97232 Hillsboro, OR 97124 APPLICANT'S REP: Mericom Corporation Attn: Chris Tigh 2701 NW Vaughn Street, Suite 890 Portland, OR 97210 LOCATION: 16580 SW 85th Avenue; WCTM 2S113B0, Tax Lot 00600. The subject site is located within the Clean Water Services Sewer Treatment Plant, south of Durham Road. ZONE: I-P: Industrial Park District. The I-P zoning district provides appropriate locations for combining light manufacturing, office and small-scale commercial uses, e.g., restaurants, personal services and fitness centers, in a campus-like setting. Only those light industrial uses with no off-site impacts, e.g., noise, glare, odor, vibration, are permitted in the I-P zone. In addition to mandatory site development review, design and development standards in the I-P zone have been adopted to insure that developments will be well-integrated, attractively landscaped, and pedestrian-friendly. APPLICABLE REVIEW CRITERIA: Community Development Code Chapters 18.390, 18.530, 18.705, 18.745, 18.765, 18.795, 18.798 and 18.810. SECTION II. DECISION Notice is hereby given that the City of Tigard Community Development Director's designee has APPROVED the above request subject to certain conditions of approval The findings and conclusions on which the decision is based are noted in Section VI. NOTICE OF TYPE II DECISION SDR2002-00010/CINGULAR COMMUNICATIONS MONOPOLE PAGE 1 OF 20 CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL THE FOLLOWING CONDITIONS SHALL BE SATISFIED PRIOR TO THE ISSUANCE OF SITE/BUILDING PERMITS: Submit to the Planning Division (Morgan Tracy, 503=09=4171,94171, ext. 2428) for review and approval: 1. The applicant/owner shall provide a revised landscape plan to ensure that the evergreen shrubs will reach 6 feet in height and 95% opacity within three years, and form a continuous hedge. Alternately, if the applicant believes that the proposed landscape plan will satisfy this standard, then the applicant shall certify that the standard will be met. 2. The applicant shall submit a revised elevation drawing indicating the color of the proposed monopole. Unless the applicant has been directed by the FAA, the color of the monopole shall be a non-reflective galvanized gray finish. 3. The applicant/owner shall provide satisfactory legal evidence, in the form of deeds, easements, leases or contracts to establish the joint access. Submit to the Engineering Department (Brian Rager, 639-4171, ext. 2471) for review and approval: 4. The owner is required to construct street improvements to SW 85th Avenue as part of a prior land use approval. The applicant shall provide a future improvements guarantee for the frontage of SW 85 prior to issuance of a site permit to assure that the street will be improved. 5. Prior to issuance of a site permit, a public facility improvement permit will be required if any work is to occur in the public right-of-way. If no work within the right-of-way is necessary, this condition will not apply. 6. An erosion control plan shall be provided as part of the public improvement drawings. The plan shall conform to "Erosion Prevention and Sediment Control Plans - Technical Guidance Handbook, February 1994." 7. The applicant shall pay the water quality fee in-lieu or provide a water quality facility that meets CWS regulations. THE FOLLOWING CONDITIONS SHALL BE SATISFIED PRIOR TO A FINAL BUILDING INSPECTION: Submit to the Engineering Department (Brian Rager, 639-4171, ext. 318) for review and approval: 8. Prior to a final building inspection, the applicant shall complete any work in the public right-of-way or public easement (if applicable) and obtain approval from the Engineering Department. THIS APPROVAL SHALL BE VALID FOR EIGHTEEN (18) MONTHS FROM THE EFFECTIVE DATE OF THIS DECISION. SECTION III. BACKGROUND INFORMATION Site History: Staff conducted a search of City records for the subject property. This site has been the subject of numerous permits, including building and electrical permits, as well as two conditional use approvals in 1990 (Case File Nos. CUP 90-00002, and CUP 90-00003), and another in 1999 (CUP 1999-00003). These are all related to various expansions and improvements of the sewer treatment plant. There is an existing lattice telecommunications tower that was constructed prior to the parcel being incorporated into the city. No other land use cases associated with this parcel were found. NOTICE OF TYPE II DECISION SDR2002-00010/CINGULAR COMMUNICATIONS MONOPOLE PAGE 2 OF 20 This parcel and surrounding properties are zoned I-P with the exception of the Durham Elementary School, zoned R-12 with an Historic District Overlay to the northeast and Tigard High School, zoned R-4.5 to the west. The City of Durham lies directly south of the subject parcel. Vicinity Information: The subject site is located south of Durham Road and east of SW 85th Avenue. Site Information and Proposal Description: The applicant is proposing to construct a 100-foot monopole tower for telecommunications service. The associated accessory equipment will be placed within a fenced and landscaped enclosure. SECTION IV. COMMENTS FROM PROPERTY OWNERS WITHIN 500 FEET No comments were received from residents or nearby property owners. SECTION V. SUMMARY OF APPLICABLE REVIEW CRITERIA The proposal's consistency with these Code Chapters is reviewed in the following sections: A. Zoning Districts 18.530 (Industrial Zoning Districts) B. Applicable Development Code Standards 18.705 Access Egress and Circulation) 18.745 Landscaping and Screening) 18.765 Off-Street parking and loading requirements) 18.780 Signs) 18.795 Visual Clearance) 18.798 Wireless Communication Facilities) C. Specific DR Approval Criteria 18.360 D. Street and Utility Improvement Standards 18.810 E. Impact Study 18.390 SECTION VI. APPLICABLE DEVELOPMENT CODE STANDARDS A. ZONIING DISTRICTS Industrial Zoning District: Section 18.530.020 Lists the description of the Industrial Zoning Districts. The site is located in the I-P: Industrial Park District. The proposed use, a Wireless Communications Facility, is permitted in this zone subject to the limitations of Chapter 18.798. Development Standards: Section 18.530.040.B States that Development standards in industrial zoning districts are contained in Table 18.530.2 below: NOTICE OF TYPE II DECISION SDR2002-00010/CINGULAR COMMUNICATIONS MONOPOLE PAGE 3 OF 20 TABLE 18.530.2 DEVELOPMENT STANDARDS IN INDUSTRIAL ZONES STANDARD I-P Proposed Minimum Lot Size None 66.5 acres - Detached unit - - Boarding, lodging, rooming house Minimum Lot Width 50 ft 750 ft. Minimum Setbacks - Front yard 35 ft. 1000 ft. -Side facing street on corner&through lots 20 ft. - -Side yard 50 ft [1] 250/1200 ft. -Side or rear yard abutting more restrictive zoning district - - Rear yard 50 ft [1] 1100 ft. - Distance between front of garage & property line abutting a public or - - private street. Maximum Height 45 ft 6.5 ft.* Maximum Site Coverage [2] 75% —30 % Minimum Landscape Requirement 25% —70% [1]no setback shall be required except 50 feet shall be required where the zone abuts a residential zone. [2]includes all buildings and impervious area "Although the tower height will be 100',it is not subject to the underlying zone height limits. The equipment will measure 6.5'in height. The site is comprised of various sanitary sewer treatment facilities and operations buildings. A large balance of the site is unimproved. The proposed wireless telecommunication facility will be located between existing structures on the site in an underutilized open area. The proposal will add a very small amount of additional impervious area to the site, approximately 300 square feet. The setbacks to the wireless communication facility exceed those of the underlying zone, with the shortest distance to the property line being 160 feet. FINDING: Based on the analysis above, the underlying zone's development criteria have been satisfied. B. APPLICABLE DEVELOPMENT CODE STANDARDS The Site Development Review approval standards require that a development proposal be found to be consistent with the various standards of the Community Development Code. Access, Egress and Circulation (18.705): Access plan: No building or other permit shall be issued until scaled plans are presented and approved as provided by this chapter that show how access, egress and circulation requirements are to be fulfilled. The applicant shall submit a site plan. The Director shall provide the applicant with detailed information about this submission requirement. The applicant has provided scaled plans showing access, egress and circulation for the proposed monopole from SW 85 Avenue, which is a public street. Joint access: Owners of two or more uses, structures, or parcels of land may agree to utilize jointly the same access and egress when the combined access and egress of both uses, structures, or parcels of land satisfies the combined requirements as designated in this title, provided: Satisfactory legal evidence shall be presented in the form of deeds, easements, leases or contracts to establish the joint use; and copies of the deeds, easements, leases or contracts are placed on permanent file with the City. The applicant has proposed to utilize the existing site access and jointly share the driveway to the wireless communication facility site. An access easement will be required. NOTICE OF TYPE II DECISION SDR2002-00010/CINGULAR COMMUNICATIONS MONOPOLE PAGE 4 OF 20 FINDING: The applicant has not submitted an access easement to establish the joint access. Public street access: All vehicular access and egress as required in Sections 18.705.030H and 18.705.0301 shall connect directly with a public or private street approved by the City for public use and shall be maintained at the required standards on a continuous basis. The subject site is accessible from SW 85th Avenue, an improved public street. This street does not presently meet the City's standards for public streets. However, a prior approval related to the improvements of the Clean Water Services requires that the street be brought up to standards in terms of width and level of improvements. This approval is presently under construction and the street improvement is imminent. However, to assure that the subject application will meet this standard, a condition will be imposed related to improvement of this street. FINDING: The subject site does not presently connect with a public street meeting the City's standards. Curb cuts: Curb cuts shall be in accordance with Section 18.810.030N: Concrete curbs, curb cuts, wheelchair, bicycle ramps and driveway approaches shall be constructed in accordance with standards specified in this chapter and Section 15.04.080: Concrete curbs and driveway approaches are required; except where no sidewalk is planned, an asphalt approach may be constructed with City Engineer approval and Asphalt and concrete driveway approaches to the property line shall be built to City configuration standards. The applicant proposes to utilize the existing curb cut and driveway apron, which conform to City standards. Walkways: On-site pedestrian walkways shall comply with the following standards: Walkways shall extend from the ground floor entrances or from the ground floor landing of stairs, ramps, or elevators of all commercial, institutional, and industrial uses, to the streets which provide the required access and egress. Walkways shall provide convenient connections between buildings in multi-building commercial, institutional, and industrial complexes. Unless impractical, walkways shall be constructed between new and existing developments and neighboring developments; The proposed facility is a non-inhabited structure and will be fenced off separately from the rest of the site for security purposes. There is a proposed walkway that will connect with the existing and planned system of walkwaya within the treatment facility. These walkways will connect to the public sidewalk on SW 85 Avenue to provide adequate pedestrian access to the site. Wherever required walkways cross vehicle access driveways or parking lots, such crossings shall be designed and located for pedestrian safety. Required walkways shall be physically separated from motor vehicle traffic and parking by either a minimum 6-inch vertical separation (curbed) or a minimum 3-foot horizontal separation, except that pedestrian crossings of traffic aisles are permitted for distances no greater than 36 feet if appropriate landscaping, pavement markings, or contrasting pavement materials are used. Walkways shall be a minimum of four feet in width, exclusive of vehicle overhangs and obstructions such as mailboxes, benches, bicycle racks, and sign posts, and shall be in compliance with ADA standards; The walkways on the site were reviewed during the prior Site Development Review cases and found to be in compliance with this standard. The newly proposed walkway will be 4 feet wide and 15 feet long. The walkway will terminate at a locked security gate. NOTICE OF TYPE II DECISION SDR2002-00010/CINGULAR COMMUNICATIONS MONOPOLE PAGE 5 OF 20 Required walkways shall be paved with hard surfaced materials such as concrete, asphalt, stone, brick, etc. Walkways may be required to be lighted and/or signed as needed for safety purposes. Soft-surfaced public use pathways may be provided only if such pathways are provided in addition to required pathways. The proposed walkway will be constructed of concrete, therefore, this standard is met. Minimum Access Requirements for Commercial and Industrial Use: Section 18.705.030.1 rovides the minimum access requirements for commercial and industrial uses: Table 18.705.3 indicates that the required access width for developments with 0-99 parking spaces is one 30-foot accesses with 24 feet of pavement. Vehicular access shall be provided to commercial or industrial uses, and shall be located within 50 feet of the primary ground floor entrances; additional requirements for truck traffic may be placed as conditions of site development review. The site has its primary access from SW 85th Avenue and is greater than 30 feet wide with more than 24 feet of pavement. The proposed development will not affect any change to the existing primary access point, which is in conformance with the code. A secondary access is also available to the site. This access also meets the minimum dimensional standards. One-way vehicular access points: Where a proposed parking facility indicates only one-way traffic flow on the site, it shall be accommodated by a specific driveway serving the facility; the entrance drive shall be situated closest to oncoming traffic and the exit drive shall be situated farthest from oncoming traffic. The existing primary access accommodates two-way traffic. The Director has the authority to restrict access when the need to do so is dictated by one or more of the following conditions: To provide for increased traffic movement on congested streets and to eliminate turning movement problems, the Director may restrict the location of driveways on streets and require the location of driveways be placed on adjacent streets, upon the finding that the proposed access would: • Cause or increase existing hazardous traffic conditions; or • Provide inadequate access for emergency vehicles; or • Cause hazardous conditions to exist which would constitute a clear and present danger to the public health, safety, and general welfare. To eliminate the need to use public streets for movements between commercial or industrial properties, parking areas shall be designed to connect with parking areas on adjacent properties unless not feasible. The Director shall require access easements between properties where necessary to provide for parking area connections; To facilitate pedestrian and bicycle traffic, access and parking area plans shall provide efficient sidewalk andlor pathway connections, as feasible, between neighboring developments or land uses; The existig access meets present City standards and affords good visibility in both directions of SW 85th Avenue. No parking area is being developed as part of this application; therefore connections to other adjacent parking areas are irrelevant. Similarly, efficient sidewalk or pathway connections between neighboring developments is beyond the scope of this proposal, since the overall site was reviewed for these connections as part of a prior land use review and no changes to parking areas or accesses are proposed. FINDING: Based on the analysis above, the Access, Egress and Circulation standards have not been fully met, however by imposing the following conditions, these standards will be satisfied. NOTICE OF TYPE II DECISION SDR2002-00010/CINGULAR COMMUNICATIONS MONOPOLE PAGE 6 OF 20 CONDITIONS: . The applicant/ owner shall provide satisfactory legal evidence, in the form of deeds, easements, leases or contracts to establish the joint access. . The owner is required to construct street improvements to SW 85th Avenue as part of a prior land use approval. The applicant shall provide a future improvements guarantee for the frontage of SW 85 prior to issuance of a site permit to assure that the street will be improved. Environmental Performance Standards (18.725) The purpose of these provisions is to apply the federal and state environmental laws, rules and regulations to development within the City of Tigard. These requirements are intended to prevent or mitigate for adverse environmental impacts to offsite properties from noise, visible emissions, vibration, odors, insects and rodents, and glare and heat. The proposed wireless communication facility will have the mechanical equipment housed within the adjacent storage unit, limiting potential noise. The use does not generate trash, sewage, wastewater, vibration, odors, or visible emissions. As there will be no trash accumulation, there should be no harboring of insects or rodents. The dull galvanized color will minimize glare. FINDING: Based on the analysis above, and continued obligation of the property owner to adhere to these provisions, this standard is met. Landscaping and Screening (18.745): Street Trees: Section 18.745.040 states that all development projects fronting on a public street or a private drive more than 100 feet in length shall be required to plant street trees in accordance with Section 18.745.040.0 Section 18.745.040.0 requires that street trees be spaced between 20 and 40 feet apart depending on the size classification of the tree at maturity (small, medium or large). This development fronts a public street and is, therefore, required to have street trees. The site was reviewed through an earlier Site Development Review and was required to plant street trees as part of the required street improvements. The applicant has been conditioned previously in this decision to provide a future improvements guarantee, which will also cover the planting of street trees. Buffering and Screening: Section 18.745.050 states that buffering, but not screening is required between abutting uses that are of a different type when the uses are separated by a street. No buffer or screening is required between similar uses. The proposed use is located centrally within the industrial property. As such, no buffering and screening is required as the parent parcel and the applicant's proposed use are similar. Buffering exists between the treatment plant site and the residential properties to the north and south and from the school to the east. Screeningg: Special Provisions: Section 18.745.050.E requires the screening of parking and loading areas. Landscaped parking areas shall include special design features which effectively screen the parking lot areas from view. Planting materials to be installed should achieve a relative balance between low lying and vertical shrubbery and trees. Trees shall be planted in landscaped islands in all parking areas, and shall be equally distributed on the basis of one (1) tree for each seven (7) parking spaces in order to provide a canopy effect. The minimum dimension on the landscape islands shall be three (3) feet wide and the landscaping shall be protected from vehicular damage by some form of wheel guard or curb. NOTICE OF TYPE II DECISION SDR2002-00010/CINGULAR COMMUNICATIONS MONOPOLE PAGE 7 OF 20 The proposed use does not require additional parking. The existing parking, area is screened by a low berm. Since no changes to the parking area are proposed or required, no additional screening will be required. Screening Of Service Facilities. Except for one-family and two-family dwellings, any refuse container or disposal area and service facilities such as gas meters and air conditioners which would otherwise be visible from a public street, customer or resident parking area, any public facility or any residential area shall be screened from view by placement of a solid wood fence or masonry wall between five and eight feet in height. All refuse materials shall be contained within the screened area; Service facilities are not needed for the proposed use, and have not been proposed. FINDING: Based on the analysis above, the landscaping and screening standards of this section have been met. Mixed Solid Waste and Recvclables Storage (18.755): Chapter 18.755 requires that new construction incorporates functional and adequate space for on-site storage and efficient collection of mixed solid waste and source separated Recyclables prior to pick-up and removal by haulers. The applicant must choose one (1) of the following four (4) methods to demonstrate compliance: Minimum Standard, Waste Assessment, Comprehensive Recycling Plan, or Franchised Hauler Review and Sign-Off. The applicant will have to submit evidence or a plan which indicates compliance with this section. Regardless of which method chosen, the applicant will have to submit a written sign-off from the franchise hauler regarding the facility location and compatibility. No mixed solid waste collection or recyclables storage is needed for this use. No changes to the site's existing refuse collection area are proposed. Location Standards. To encourage its use, the storage area for source-separated recyclable shall be co- located with the storage area for residual mixed solid waste; indoor and outdoor storage areas shall comply with Uniform Building and Fire Code requirements; Storage area space requirements can be satisfied with a single location or multiple locations, and can combine both interior and exterior locations; Exterior storage areas can be located within interior side yard or rear yard areas. Exterior storage areas shall not be located within a required front yard setback or in a yard adjacent to a public or private street; Exterior storage areas shall be located in central and visible locations on a site to enhance security for users; Exterior storage areas can be located in a parking,area if the proposed use provides at least the minimum number of parking spaces required for the use after deducting the area used for storage. Storage areas Shall be appropriately screened according to the provisions in 18.755.050 C, design standards; The storage area shall be accessible for collection vehicles and located so that the storage area will not obstruct pedestrian or vehicle traffic movement on the site or on public streets adjacent to the site. No mixed solid waste collection or recyclables storage is needed for this use. Therefore, this standard is met. Design Standards. The dimensions of the storage area shall accommodate containers consistent with current methods of local collection; Storage containers shall meet Uniform Fire Code standards and be made and covered with waterproof materials or situated in a covered area; Exterior storage areas shall be enclosed by a sight-obscuring fence wall, or hedge at least six feet in height. Gate openings which allow access to users and haulers shall be provided. Gate openings for haulers shall be a minimum of 10 feet wide and shall be capable of being secured in a closed and open position; Storage area(s) and containers shall be clearly labeled to indicate the type of materials accepted. NOTICE OF TYPE II DECISION SDR2002-00010/CINGULAR COMMUNICATIONS MONOPOLE PAGE 8 OF 20 No mixed solid waste collection or recyclables storage is needed for this use. Therefore, this standard is met. FINDING: Based on the analysis above, the Mixed Solid Waste & Recyclables Storage Standards have been met. Off-Street Parking and Loading (18.765): Location of vehicle parking: Off-street arking spaces for single-family and duplex dwellings and single-family attached dwellings shall be located on the same lot with the dwellings. Off-street parking lots for uses not listed above shall be located not further than 200 feet from the building or use that they are required to serve, measured in a straight line from the building with the following exceptions: a) commercial and industrial uses which require more than 40 parking spaces may provide for the spaces in excess of the required first 40 spaces up to a distance of 300 feet from the primary site; The 40 parking spaces which remain on the primary site must be available for users in the following order of priority: 1) Disabled-accessible spaces; 2) Short-term spaces; 3) Long-term preferential carpool and vanpool spaces; 4) Long-term spaces. No parking is required for the proposed use. Therefore, this standard is met. Joint Parking: Owners of two or more uses, structures or parcels of land may agree to utilize jointly the same parking and loading spaces when the peak hours of operation do not overlay, subject to the following: 1) The size of the joint parking facility shall be at least as large as the number of vehicle parking spaces required by the larger(est) use per Section 18.765.070; 2) Satisfactory legal evidence shall be presented to the Director in the form of deeds, leases or contracts to establish the joint use; 3) If a joint use arrangement is subsequently terminated, or if the uses change, the requirements of this title thereafter apply to each separately. Joint parking is not proposed with this application. Therefore, this standard does not apply. Parking in Mixed-Use Projects: In mixed-use projects, the required minimum vehicle parking shall be determined using the following formula. 1) Primary use, i.e., that with the largest proportion of total floor area within the development, at 100% of the minimum vehicle parking required for that use in Section 18.765.060; 2) Secondary use, i.e., that with the second largest percentage of total floor area within the develo ment, at 90% of the vehicle parking required for that use in Section 18.765.060; 3 Subsequent use or uses, at 80% of the vehicle parking required for that use(s) in ection 18.765.060; 4) The maximum parking allowance shall be 150% of the total minimum parking as calculated in D.1.-3. above. The project is not considered a mixed-use project. Therefore, this standard does not apply. Visitor Parking in Multi-Family Residential Developments: Multi-dwelling units with more than 10 required parking spaces shall provide an additional 15% of vehicle parking spaces above the minimum required for the use of guests of residents of the complex. These spaces shall be centrally located or distributed throughout the development. Required bicycle parking facilities shall also be centrally located within or evenly distributed throughout the development. This project does not involve a residential use. Therefore, this standard does not apply. Preferential Long-Term Carpool/Vanpool Parking: Parking lots providing in excess of 20 long-term parking spaces shall provide preferential long-term carpool and vanpool parking for employees, students and other regular visitors to the site. At least 5% of total long-term parking spaces shall be reserved for carpool/vanpool use. Preferential parking for carpools/vanpools shall be closer to the main entrances of the building than any other employee or student parking except parking spaces designated for use by the disabled. Preferential NOTICE OF TYPE II DECISION SDR2002-00010/CINGULAR COMMUNICATIONS MONOPOLE PAGE 9 OF 20 carpool/vanpool spaces shall be full-sized per requirements in Section 18.765.040N and shall be clearly designated for use only by carpools and vanpools between 7:00 AM and 5:30 PM Monday through Friday. No parking is required for the proposed use. Therefore, no carpool/vanpool stalls are required. Disabled-Accessible Parking: All parking areas shall be provided with the required number of parking spaces for disabled persons as specified by the State of Oregon Uniform Building Code and federal standards. Such parking spaces shall be sized, signed and marked-as required by these regulations. No parking is required for the proposed use. The facility is not intended for public access and is, therefore, exempt from ADA accessibility requirements. Therefore, this standard has been met. Access Drives: With regard to access to public streets from off-street parking: access drives from the street to off-street parking or loading areas shall be designed and constructed to facilitate the flow of traffic and provide maximum safety for pedestrian and vehicular traffic on the site; the number and size of access drives shall be in accordance with the requirements of Chapter, 18.705, Access, Egress and Circulation; access drives shall be clearly and permanently marked and defined through use of rails, fences, walls or other barriers or markers on frontage not occupied by service drives; access drives shall have a minimum vision clearance in accordance with Chapter 18.795, Visual Clearance; access drives shall be improved with an asphalt or concrete surface; and excluding single-family and duplex residences, except as provided by Subsection 18.810.030.P, groups of two or more parking spaces shall be served by a service drive so that no backing movements or other maneuvering within a street or other public right-of-way will be required. No changes to the primary access are proposed. Pedestrian Access: Pedestrian access through parking lots shall be provided in accordance with Section 18.705.030.F. Where a parking area or other vehicle area has a drop-off grade separation, the property owner shall install a wall, railing, or other barrier which will prevent a slow-moving vehicle or driverless vehicle from escaping such area and which will prevent pedestrians from walking over drop-off edges. There are no changes proposed to the parking and there are no pedestrian destinations that would necessitate pedestrian access from the parking lot. Parking Lot Striping: Except for single-family and duplex residences, any area intended to be used to meet the off-street parking requirements as contained in this Chapter shall have all parking spaces clearly marked; and all interior drives and access aisles shall be clearly marked and signed to show direction of flow and maintain vehicular and pedestrian safety . There are no changes proposed to the parking area and no parking is required for the proposed use. Therefore, this standard has been met. Wheel Stops: Parking spaces along the boundaries of a parking lot or adjacent to interior landscaped areas or sidewalks shall be provided with a wheel stop at least four inches high located three feet back from the front of the parking stall. The front three feet of the parking stall may be concrete, asphalt or low lying landscape material that does not exceed the height of the wheel stop. This area cannot be calculated to meet landscaping or sidewalk requirements. NOTICE OF TYPE II DECISION SDR2002-00010/CINGULAR COMMUNICATIONS MONOPOLE PAGE 10 OF 20 There are no changes proposed to the parking area and no parking is required for the proposed use. Therefore, this standard has been met. Space and Aisle Dimensions: Section 18.765.040.N states that: "except as modified for angled parking in Figures 18.765.1 and 18.765.2 the minimum dimensions for parking spaces are: 8.5 feet x 18.5 feet for a standard space and 7.5 feet x 16.5 feet for a compact space; aisles accommodating two direction traffic, or allowing access from both ends, shall be 24 feet in width. There are no changes proposed to the parking area and no parking is required for the proposed use. Therefore, this standard has been met. Bicycle Parking Location and Access: Section 18.765.050 states bicycle parking areas shall be provided at locations within 50 feet of primary entrances to structures; bicycle parking areas shall not be located within parking aisles, landscape areas or pedestrian ways; outdoor bicycle parking shall be visible from on-site buildings and/or the street. When the bicycle parking area is not visible from the street, directional signs shall be used to locate the parking area; and bicycle parking may be located inside a building on a floor which has an outdoor entrance open for use and floor location which does not require the bicyclist to use stairs to gain access to the space. Exceptions may be made to the latter requirement for parking on upper stories within a multi-story residential building. There are no changes proposed to the parking area and no bicycle parking is required for the proposed use. Therefore, this standard has been met. Bicycle Parking Design Requirements: Section 18.765.050.C. The following design requirements apply to the installation of bicycle racks: The racks required for required bicycle parking spaces shall ensure that bicycles may be securely locked to them without undue inconvenience. Provision of bicycle lockers for long-term (employee) parking is encouraged but not required; bicycle racks must be securely anchored to the ground, wall or other structure; bicycle parking spaces shall be at least 21/2 feet by six feet long, and, when covered, with a vertical clearance of seven feet. An access aisle of at least five feet wide shall be provided and maintained beside or between each row of bicycle parking; each required bicycle parking space must be accessible without moving another bicycle; required bicycle parking spaces may not be rented or leased except where required motor vehicle parking is rented or leased. At-cost or deposit fees for bicycle parking are exempt from this requirement; and areas set aside for required bicycle parking must be clearly reserved for bicycle parking only. Outdoor bicycle parking facilities shall be surfaced with a hard surfaced material, i.e., pavers, asphalt, concrete or similar material. This surface must be designed to remain well drained. There are no changes proposed to the parking area and no bicycle parking is required for the proposed use. Therefore, this standard has been met. Minimum Bicycle Parking Requirements: The total number of required bicycle parking spaces for each use is specified in Table 18.765.2 in Section 18.765.070.H. In no case shall there be less than two bicycle parking spaces. As discussed above, according to Table 18.765.2 of the Tigard Development Code, the minimum bicycle-parking requirement for a Wireless Communication Facility is zero spaces. Minimum Off-Street Parking: Section 18.765.070.H states that the minimum and maximum parking shall be as required in Table 18.765.2. Table 18.765.2 states that the minimum parking for a Wireless Communication Facility is zero spaces. Therefore, this standard is satisfied. NOTICE OF TYPE II DECISION SDR2002-00010/CINGULAR COMMUNICATIONS MONOPOLE PAGE 11 OF 20 • Off-Street Loading Spaces: Commercial, industrial and institutional buildings or structures to be built or altered which receive and distribute material or merchandise by truck shall provide and maintain off-street loading and maneuvering space as follows: A minimum of one loading space is required for buildings with 10,000 gross square feet or more; A minimum of two loading spaces for buildings with 40,000 gross square feet or more. Loading spaces are provided for the existing use. The proposed monopole will not necessitate a loading space. FINDING: Based on the above analysis, the off-street parking and loading standards have been met. Signs (18.780): Chapter 18.780.130.D lists the type of allowable signs and sign area permitted in the I-P Zoning District. The proposed plans do not call for any signage. Based on this, this standard is met. FINDING: This standard is met, since the applicant has not proposed any signs. Tree Removal (18.790): Section 18.790.030 requires that a tree plan for the planting, removal and protection of trees prepared by a certified arborist shall be provided with a site development review application. The tree plan shall include identification of all existing trees, identification of a program to save existing trees or mitigate tree removal over 12 inches in caliper, which trees are to be removed, protection program defining standards and methods that will be used by the applicant to protect trees during and after construction. The applicant's plans do not propose any tree removal, and there are no trees in the immediate vicinity that would be impacted by the construction of the monopole. Therefore no specific protection measures will be necessary. FINDING: There are no trees impacted by this proposal, therefore this standard is met. Visual Clearance Areas (18.795): Chapter 18.795 requires that a clear vision area shall be maintained on the corners of all property adjacent to intersecting right-of-ways or the intersection of a public street and a private driveway. A clear vision area shall-contain no vehicle, hedge planting, fence, wall structure, or temporary or permanent obstruction exceeding three (3) feet in height. The code provides that obstructions that may be located in this area shall be visually clear between three (3) and eight (8) feet in height (8) (trees may be placed within this area provided that a branches below eight (8) feet are removed). A visual clearance area is the triangular area formed by measuring a 30-foot distance along the street right- of-way and the driveway, and then connecting these two (2), 30-foof distance points with a straight line. The primary access to this property is from SW 85th Avenue. The vision clearance areas are shown on the applicant's site plan. Based on a site visual investigation, staff confirms that there are no visual obstacles at the site's access entry. FINDING: The Visual Clearance Standards have been met. Wireless Communication Facilities (18.798): Chapter 18.798 allows wireless communication facilities in commercial zones, the I-P zone and public rights of way, subject to a Site Development Review process, provided they satisfy the specific criteria outlined in this chapter and are setback from any offsite residence a distance equal to the height of the tower. NOTICE OF TYPE II DECISION SDR2002-00010/CINGULAR COMMUNICATIONS MONOPOLE PAGE 12 OF 20 Aesthetic: New towers shall maintain a non-reflective gray finish or, if required by the FAA, be painted pursuant to the FAA's requirements; if collocation on an existing is requested, the design of any antenna(s), accessory structures or equipment shall, to the extent possible, use materials, colors and textures that will match the existing tower or non-tower structure to which the a uipment of the collocating provider is being attached; if collocation on an existing non-tower structure is requested, the antenna(s) and supporting electrical and mechanical equipment shall be a neutral color that is the same as the color as the supporting structure so as to make the antenna(s) and related equipment as visually unobtrusive as possible. The proposed facility is not a collocation. The applicant has not indicated what color the tower will be, nor has the applicant provided information from FAA to determine whether additional flight safety marking will be required. Setbacks: Towers designed to collapse within themselves shall be set back in accordance with the setbacks contained in the base zone; towers not designed to collapse within themselves shall be set back from the property line by a distance equal to the height of the tower. The applicant has proposed to locate the 100-foot tower no closer than 250 feet to any property line in compliance with this requirement. Tower spacing: No new tower shall be allowed within 500 feet of an existing tower. The nearest existing tower is approximately 675 feet to the west. Tower height: No tower shall exceed 100 feet for a single user or 125 feet for multiple users; The proposed tower is for a single user, and will be 100 feet. The antennae will be mounted at the top of the tower and will extend another 4 feet above the tower. Lighting: No lighting shall be permitted on a tower except as required by the FAA; No lighting has been proposed on the tower. Fencing and security: For security purposes, towers and ancillary facilities shall be enclosed by a minimum six-foot fence; The proposed facility will be enclosed by a six-foot chain link fence, the equipment will be wholly enclosed within the existing storage units. Landscaping and screening: Landscaping shall be placed outside the fence and shall consist of evergreen shrubs which reach six feet in height and 95% opacity within three years of planting; when adjacent to or within residentially-zoned property, free- standing towers and accessory equipment facilities shall be screened by the planting of a minimum of four evergreen trees at least 15 feet in height at the time of planting. The proposed tower is not within a residential zone. The applicant has proposed 6 Douglas Fir trees and 24 Photinia plants to surround the fence enclosure. Staff questions whether the 5-foot on center spacing specified for the Photinia will accomplish the 95% opacity standard. Staff, therefore, recommends that the applicant revise the landscape plan to achieve this standard, or certify that the proposed landscaping will achieve the standard. Noise: Noise-generating equipment shall be sound-buffered by means of baffling, barriers or other suitable means to reduce the sound level measured at the property line to 50 dBA (day)/40 dBA (night) when adjacent to a noise-sensitive land use and 75 dBA (day)/60 dBA (night) when adjacent to other uses. NOTICE OF TYPE II DECISION SDR2002-00010/CINGULAR COMMUNICATIONS MONOPOLE PAGE 13 OF 20 The mechanical equipment will be housed and completely enclosed within metal cabinets. The only external sounds anticipated would be from the air conditioning unit. The property is adjacent to residential property, and a school; however, the distance between the proposed use and these noise sensitive uses is so vast, no impact is expected. Nevertheless, the applicant shall note that a maximum 50 dBA (day)/40 dBA (night) noise limit as measured from the property line is required. If these levels are exceeded, a civil citation could result. FINDING: Based on the analysis above, staff cannot determine whether the specific requirements for wireless facilities have been satisfied. However, with the imposition of the following conditions, these standards can be met. CONDITIONS: Unless the applicant has been otherwise directed by the FAA, the color of the monopole shall be a non-reflective galvanized gray finish. The landscape plan shall be revised to ensure that the evergreen shrubs will reach 6 feet in height and 95% opacity within three years, and form a continuous hedge. Alternately, if the applicant believes that the proposed landscape plan will satisfy this standard, then the applicant shall certify that the standard will be met. C. SPECIFIC SITE DEVELOPMENT REVIEW APPROVAL STANDARDS Section 18.360.090(A)(2) through 18.360.090(A)(15) provides additional Site Development Review approval standards not necessarily covered by the provisions of the previously listed sections. These additional standards are addressed immediately below with the following exceptions: The proposal contains no elements related to the provisions of the following and are, therefore, found to be inapplicable as approval standards: 18.360.090.3 (Exterior Elevations); 18.360.090.5 (Privacy and Noise: Multi-family or Group Living Uses); 18.360.090.6 (Private Outdoor Areas: Multi-family Use); 18.360.090.7 (Shared Outdoor Recreation Areas: Multi-family Use); 18.360.090.8 (100-year floodplain); and 18.360.090.9 (Demarcation of Spaces). The following sections were discussed previously in this decision and, therefore, will not be addressed in this section: 18.360.090.4 (Buffering, Screening and Compatibility Between Adjoining Uses); 18.360.090.13 Parking); 18.360.090.14 (Landscaping); 18.360.090.15 (Drainage); and 18.360.090.14 (Provisions for the Disabled). Relationship to the Natural and Physical Environment: Buildings shall be: located to preserve existing trees, topography and natural drainage where possible based upon existing site conditions; located in areas not subject to ground slumping or sliding; located to provide adequate distance between adjoining buildings for adequate light, air circulation, and fire-fighting; and oriented with consideration for sun and wind. Trees shall be preserved to the extent possible. Replacement of trees is subject to the requirements of Chapter 18.790, Tree Removal. The proposed wireless communication facility site will be located on a small landscape island between the access roads to various treatment structures. A small amount of landscaping will be displaced, however, the facility itself will be screened by landscape materials. No tree removal, land grading, or drainage alteration is required to accommodate the proposed development. Suitable separation is provided between the proposed equipment shelter and any other buildings on or off site, which is adequate for light and air circulation. NOTICE OF TYPE II DECISION SDR2002-00010/CINGULAR COMMUNICATIONS MONOPOLE PAGE 14 OF 20 Crime Prevention and Safety: • Windows shall be located so that areas vulnerable to crime can be surveyed by the occupants; • Interior laundry and service areas shall be located in a way that they can be observed by others; • Mail boxes shall be located in lighted areas having vehicular or pedestrian traffic; • The exterior lighting levels shall be selected and the angles shall be oriented towards areas vulnerable to crime; and • Light fixtures shall be provided in areas having heavy pedestrian or vehicular traffic and in potentially dangerous areas such as parking lots, stairs, ramps and abrupt grade changes. Fixtures shall be placed at a height so that light patterns overlap at a height of seven feet, which is sufficient to illuminate a person. The un-staffed status of the site necessitates added security. Chain link fencing is proposed to surround the monopole. Radio cabinets will be placed inside the fenced enclosure. There is existing security lighting for the wastewater treatment facility. Therefore, this criterion has been met. Public Transit: Provisions within the plan shall be included to provide for transit if the development proposal is adjacent to existing or proposed transit route; the requirements for transit facilities shall be based on: the location of other transit facilities in the area; and the size and type of the proposal. The following facilities may be required after City and Tri-Met review: bus stop shelters; turnouts for buses; and connecting paths to the shelters. Thy site has frontage on SW 85th Avenue. While there is transit service to the corner of SW 85t Avenue and Durham Road, the proposed development is un-staffed and, therefore, does not generate potential ridership. Therefore, this standard does not apply. Provisions of the Underlying Zone: All of the provisions and regulations of the underlying zone shall apply unless modified by other sections or this title, e.g., Planned Developments, Chapter 18.350; or a variance or adjustment granted under Chapter 18.370. Dimensional Requirements: Provisions of the (I-P) Industrial Park Zoning District have been addressed earlier in this decision under Section 18.530.040. FINDING: Based on the analysis above, the specific standards of the Site Development Review Section have been met. D. Street And Utility Improvements Standards (Section 18.810): Chapter 18.810 provides construction standards for the implementation of public and private facilities and utilities such as streets, sewers, and drainage. The applicable standards are addressed below: Streets: Improvements: Section 18.810.030.A.1 states that streets within a development and streets adjacent shall be improved in accordance with the TDC standards. Section 18.810.030.A.2 states that any new street or additional street width planned as a portion of an existing street shall be dedicated and improved in accordance with the TDC. NOTICE OF TYPE II DECISION SDR2002-00010/CINGULAR COMMUNICATIONS MONOPOLE PAGE 15 OF 20 • This site lies adjacent to SW 85th Avenue, which is classified as a Planned Arterial in the City of Tigard Transportation System Plan. At present, there is approximately 30 feet of total ROW, according to the most recent tax assessor's map. This right of way is inadequate to meet the TSP planned right-of-way width of 96 feet. However, the proposed use generates a very small amount of additional traffic (approximately 2 trips per month). Requiring additional right of way for the proposed use would not be proportionate to the level of anticipated impact. Sidewalks: Section 18.810.070.A requires that sidewalks be constructed to meet City design standards and be located on both sides of arterial, collector and local residential streets. There are existing sidewalks along the site's frontage. Sanitary Sewers: Sewers Required: Section 18.810.090.A requires that sanitary sewer be installed to serve each new development and to connect developments to existing mains in accordance with the provisions set forth in Design and Construction Standards for Sanitary and Surface Water Management (as adopted by Clean Water Services in 1996 and including any future revisions or amendments) and the adopted policies of the comprehensive plan. Over-sizing: Section 18.810.090.0 states that proposed sewer systems shall include consideration of additional development within the area as projected by the Comprehensive Plan. There is an existing 8-inch public sewer main located in SW 85th Avenue and a 60-inch line that feed the sewer treatment plant. The proposed use does not require sewer service, so no additional public sewer line work is necessary for this development. Storm Drainage: General Provisions: Section 18.810.100.A states requires developers to make adequate provisions for storm water and flood water runoff. Accommodation of Upstream Drainage: Section 18.810.100.0 states that a culvert or other drainage facility shall be large enough to accommodate potential runoff from its entire upstream drainage area, whether inside or outside the development. The City Engineer shall approve the necessary size of the facility, based on the provisions of Design and Construction Standards for Sanitary and Surface Water Management (as adopted by Clean Water Services in 2000 and including any future revisions or amendments). The topography of this is very flat and is served by an Internal system of surface drains. These drains discharge into the storm system in SW 85 Avenue. The applicant's onsite storm drainage plan will collect any surface water that would impact this site and convey it to the public system in SW 85 Avenue. Effect on Downstream Drainage: Section 18.810.100.D states that where it is anticipated by the City Engineer that the additional runoff resulting from the development will overload an existing drainage facility, the Director and Engineer shall withhold approval of the development until provisions have been made for improvement of the potential condition or until provisions have been made for storage of additional runoff caused by the development in accordance with the Design and Construction Standards for Sanitary and Surface Water Management (as adopted by Clean Water Services in 2000 and including any future revisions or amendments). CWS design standards provide that if the impervious area of a site is not increased over 5,000 square feet, then onsite detention is not required. There is a net increase of approximately 1,500 square feet of impervious area resulting from this proposal. Therefore, on-site detention is not required for this project. NOTICE OF TYPE II DECISION SDR2002-00010/CINGULAR COMMUNICATIONS MONOPOLE PAGE 16 OF 20 Bikeways and Pedestrian Pathways: Bikeway Extension: Section 18.810.110.A states that developments adjoining proposed bikeways identified on the City's adopted pedestrian/bikeway plan shall include provisions for the future extension of such bikeways through the dedication of easements or right-of-way. No bikeways are associated with this project. Therefore, this criterion does not apply. Cost of Construction: Section 18.810.110.B states that development permits issued for planned unit developments, conditional use permits, subdivisions, and other developments which will principally benefit from such bikeways shall be conditioned to include the cost or construction of bikeway improvements. No bikeways are associated with this project. Therefore, this criterion does not apply. Minimum Width: Section 18.810.110.0 states that the minimum width for bikeways within the roadway is five feet per bicycle travel lane. Minimum width for two-way bikeways separated from the road is eight feet. No bikeways are associated with this project. Therefore, this criterion does not apply. Utilities: Section 18.810.120 states that all utility lines, but not limited to those required for electric, communication, lighting and cable television services and related facilities shall be placed underground, except for surface mounted transformers, surface mounted connection boxes and meter cabinets which may be placed above ground, temporary utility service facilities during construction, high capacity electric lines operating at 50,000 volts or above, and: • The developer shall make all necessary arrangements with the serving utility to provide the underground services; • The City reserves the right to approve location of all surface mounted facilities; • All underground utilities, including sanitary sewers and storm drains installed in streets by the developer, shall be constructed prior to the surfacing of the streets; and • Stubs for service connections shall be long enough to avoid disturbing the street improvements when service connections are made. Exception to Under-Grounding Requirement: Section 18.810.120.0 states that a developer shall pay a fee in-lieu of under-grounding costs when the development is proposed to take place on a street where existing utilities which are not underground will serve the development and the approval authority determines that the cost and technical difficulty of under-grounding the utilities outweighs the benefit of under- grounding in conjunction with the development. The determination shall be on a case- by-case basis. The most common, but not the only, such situation is a short frontage development for which under-grounding would result in the placement of additional poles, rather than the removal of above-ground utilities facilities. An applicant for a development which is served by utilities which are not underground and which are located across a public right-of-way from the applicant's property shall pay a fee in-lieu of under-grounding. There are no existing overhead utility lines along SW 85th Avenue. CWS was required to underground these lines as part of their prior approval. No additional fee shall be assessed. All service utilities to the development shall be installed underground however. ADDITIONAL CITY AND/OR AGENCY CONCERNS WITH STREET AND UTILITY IMPROVEMENT STANDARDS: Public Water System: This site is located in the Tigard Water District service area. NOTICE OF TYPE II DECISION SDR2002-00010/CINGULAR COMMUNICATIONS MONOPOLE PAGE 17 OF 20 Storm Water Quality: The City has agreed to enforce Surface Water Management (SWM) regulations established by Clean Water Services (CWS) Design and Construction Standards (adopted by Resolution and Order No. 00-7) which require the construction of on-site water quality facilities. The facilities shall be designed to remove 65 percent of the phosphorus contained in 100 percent of the storm water runoff generated from newly created impervious surfaces. In addition, a maintenance plan shall be submitted indicating the frequency and method to be used in keeping the facility maintained through the year. The small amount of increased impervious area (approximately 1,500 square feet) does not necessitate a water quality facility, and creation of such a facility may be impractical within the confines of this landscape island. As such, a payment in lieu of providing a water quality facility may be imposed. Grading and Erosion Control: UWS Less n and Construction Standards also regulate erosion control to reduce the amount of-sediment and other pollutants reaching the public storm and surface water system resulting from development, construction, grading, excavating, clearing, and any other activity which accelerates erosion. Per CWS regulations, the applicant is required to submit an erosion control plan for City review and approval prior to issuance of City permits. The Federal Clean Water Act requires that a National Pollutant Discharge Elimination System (NPDES) erosion control permit be issued for any development that will disturb five or more acres of land. While the subject property is greater than 5 acres, the area of disturbance is limited to approximately 1200 square feet. Since this disturbed area is less than five acres, the developer will not be required to obtain an NPDES ermit from the City prior to construction. This permit will be issued along with the site and/or building permit. A grading and erosion control plan must be submitted to the Building Division during the site permit review phase. The Building Division will review the onsite grading plan during the site permit review. A NPDES permit is not required, as the disturbance area is less than five acres in size. FINDING: Based on the above analysis, the Agency Concerns have been addressed by the application materials with the exception of water quality requirements. CONDITION: The applicant shall pay the water quality fee in lieu or provide a water quality facility that meets CWS regulations. Address Assignments: The City of Tigard is responsible for assigning addresses for parcels within the City of Tigard and within the Urban Service Boundary (USB). An addressing fee in the amount of $30.00 per address shall be assessed. This fee shall be paid to the City prior to issuance of a site permit. For this project, there is no additional addressing fee, as the existing address will be maintained. E. IMPACT STUDY (18.390) Section 18.360.090 states, "The Director shall make a finding with respect to each of the following criteria when approving, approving with conditions or denying an application:' Section 18.390.040 states that the applicant shall provide an impact study to quantify the effect of development on public facilities and services. For each public facility system and type of impact, the study shall propose improvements necessary to meet City standard, and to minimize the impact of the development on the public at large, public facilities systems, and affected private property users. NOTICE OF TYPE II DECISION SDR2002-00010/CINGULAR COMMUNICATIONS MONOPOLE PAGE 18 OF 20 In situations where the Community Development Code requires the dedication of real property interests, the applicant shall either specifically concur with a requirement for public right-of-way dedication, or provide evidence that supports that the real property dedication is not roughly proportional to the projected impacts of the development. Section 18.390.040 states that when a condition of approval requires the transfer to the public of an interest in real property, the approval authority shall adopt findings which support the conclusion that the interest in real property to be transferred is roughly proportional to the impact the proposed development will have on the public. The applicant has provided an impact study addressing the project's impacts on public systems. The study notes that there will be no impact to the transportation system as the facility will only generate two trips per month. Bikeways will likewise not be affected, and there are no bikeways in the immediate area. The drainage system will not be adversely impacted either. As the area to be developed will be covered with semi-pervious gravel, there will be no significant increase to the amount of stormwater runoff that is currently being contributed to the system. Parks, water and sewer systems will not be impacted as the proposed monopole is un-staffed and does not require sewer or water hookups. Earlier in this report, the issue about noise from the air conditioning units was raised, but staff found the degree of separation between the proposed use and noise sensitive uses to adequately protect those uses from noise. There is no TIF assessment for this use as it generates a limited amount of traffic. FINDING: The proposed development either has no impact or will mitigate the effect of the impact for the above noted public systems through the imposition of conditions. SECTION VII. OTHER STAFF COMMENTS The City of Tigard Forester has reviewed the proposal and noted that no trees will be impacted by the proposed improvements, and therefore has no comments. The City of Tigard Crime Prevention Office of the Police Department has reviewed the proposal and has no objections to it. The City of Tigard Public Works Department has reviewed the proposal and has no objections to it. The City of Tigard Building Department was notified of the proposal and did not respond. SECTION VIII. AGENCY COMMENTS Oregon Department of Aviation has reviewed the proposal and has no objections to it. Clean Water Services has reviewed the proposal and has no objections to it. The City of Durham has reviewed the proposal and has no objections to it. Tualatin Valley Fire and Rescue has reviewed the applicant's submittal and provided the following comments: In order to ensure the adequate protection of the public health, safety, and welfare of the citizens of the City of Tigard, no permitted wireless communications facility operator shall operate the permitted facility in any way that impedes, impairs, or negatively impacts the communication abilities of any public safety or emergency response organization serving the public within the City of Tigard's jurisdictional limits. NOTICE OF TYPE II DECISION SDR2002-00010/CINGULAR COMMUNICATIONS MONOPOLE PAGE 19 OF 20 Additionally, it is noted that federal regulations give priority to communications involving safety of life or property, as follows: 47 CFR § 90.403 (d) provides in relevant part, that communications involving the imminent safety of fife or property, are to be afforded priority by all licensees. If interference complaints are filed against the cell tower operator, which allege radio frequency interference, the cell tower operator shall provide documentary evidence from the FCC that the cell tower operator has complied with all federal laws and regulations regarding the handling and resolution of such complaints, and confirming that the communications involving the public safety provider have been given priority by the cell tower operator. Washington County Communications (WCCCA), Portland General Electric, NW Natural Gas, AT&T Cable, Verizon, and Qwest Communications were all notified of the proposal and did not respond. SECTION IX. PROCEDURE AND APPEAL INFORMATION Notice: Notice was posted at City Hall and mailed to: X The applicant and owners X Owner of record within the required distance X Affected government agencies Final Decision: THIS DECISION IS FINAL ON AUGUST 8, 2002 AND BECOMES EFFECTIVE ON AUGUST 23, 2002 UNLESS AN APPEAL IS FILED. AAp eal:� The decision of the Director (Type II Procedure) or Review Authority (Type II Administrative Appeal or Type III Procedure) is final for purposes of appeal on the date that it is mailed. Any party with standing as provided in Section 18.390.040.G.1. may appeal this decision in accordance with Section 18.390.040.G.2. of the Tigard Community Development Code which provides that a written appeal together with the required fee shall be filed with the Director within ten (10) business days of the date the notice of the decision was mailed. The appeal fee schedule and forms are available from the Planning Division of Tigard City Hall, 13125 SW Hall Boulevard, Tigard, Oregon 97223. Unless the applicant is the appellant, the hearing on an appeal from the Director's Decision shall be confined to the specific issues identified in the written comments submitted by the parties during the comment period. Additional evidence concerning issues properly raised in the Notice of Appeal may be submitted by any party during the appeal hearing, subject to any additional rules of procedure that may be adopted from time to time by the appellate body. THE DEADLINE FOR FILING AN APPEAL IS AT 5:00 PM ON AUGUST 22, 2002. Questions: If you have any questions, lease call the City of Tigard Planning Division, Tigard City Hall, 13125 SW Hall Boulevard, Tigard, Oregon at (503) 639-4171. August 8 2002 PREPAR' ' :Y: organ Tr y DATE Associate Planner \curpin\morgan\workspace\sdr\sdr2002-00010(cingular#2)\sdr2002-00010 decision.doc NOTICE OF TYPE II DECISION SDR2002-00010/CINGULAR COMMUNICATIONS MONOPOLE PAGE 20 OF 20 _ - Iii�,�. •,, n T M T . 1 ii = fiJ^I I ( CITY of TIGARD ,',,,:41- 011 :� it Vi •tired. III1�111, GE OGR�RHIC IN FOR Y�TION SYSTEM ��'1 t�rr - , . m %%:111 s',•:'1 .: .'�1`t, C ,- �, 11 n - =Q � � VICINITY MAP ' 72 - 11111111111 1 : 1 —� f►��■= ��C 111111111 1 SDR2002-00010 dos*- tion igi 1aa■IIIIrdh..1 •E 11111m►� wr�l1o' lift— 1 r^, 1 e CINGULAR WIRELESS I: ` `\ MONOPOLE J°TTMENI N 1 1F„fr PLANT orpfr,„4„ 1,, Mr ' ______ lik t YI ORS FF.HIi FE y , � -NumIllumi■ 4,405 111,4fr k: '2 kaaill iiiliIiii�r, I '.11' BIP •,,�,,,,,� ` 111,8°""A D ``, I,I BEND RD. 4f I::N: —174"Bill o Tlperd Area Msp -i ill►� :� _ iu a y 0 400 800 Feet : '.�j:;' w 1'=628 feel A•f: 4 gal. _ ∎■.0-2141-1-0401;1 •1 City of Tigard 3E,P3 / ,�„ �= ,(. �' / Tigard,OR 97223 . w /`C (503J 639-4177 • -w-��- / \ http://www.ci.tigard.or.us Community Development Plot date:Jul 8,2002;C:lmagic MAGIC03.APR • • • ..? IL SIYMI 111.0110114040 2; —ow .7/./://///////.://502&" ../////Y 7: ratislP =E. . ,.. ky,-,-4.,, • c, . ,f' ,i4P■' -.- -,L. • •;•50 ., _. + , it '•0 0 . , • . •=....--joo . • - ir-'-',-A. *.ii-r.,, ci,- 7,` =.° •:•cilli ' prz-i....4•..._-: .6. ., ,.. . . or + 0 4 : . • •• il 1 . „ .ts 0;p-,,---,•1-•:4-.-I-..- 1,l466e44.i.,Or1 e; 'r...o•,t,,,„.p. \\ 0 It 0 N 0 _., o - „r ,? ' ,:zi •-.... klOts L'eAr 47.14m7,7414,- e .`;07' Ice .-4-/A--v■- •71 • . • ....... .... i r„ .„..4....,x ,41r..--..,,,, Fez/ ,„Tr„ ,, •..,. Luc 1 ..r.r. t," ', --..:ri'Vkit:5-q '-.'.,NW 4: eg,,,,•?'17, .." 1111 AI • . di • ... i= •;#e'.•'%I. ' ftir .,&,•4.('F e--,-,_ . • ,--'%.__ . IM. I 411.= 410:400H- 4,,,......6"::: ,,,,4,0 406.11,„ 7:.,....• . (71,1".......... .,I• • -:"...I en 4" I"s, /__,,,..a„._/ i'I,0".: C)•• • , .‘„%&,,PZ ilt Iple . 1 4. 4'.... •. - '‘'..* `, 144.) ,.. — .. ...:.!.,.. i !...-,-.7,...—FiD ,115),T,..„i •••••2400,.._./ _, 0 (117-----iv= "4-- ( • k-dati - - -`. • '1 ,--) t III _a A:1 ) 2t.o. or I 0 "allE • z ii .' i ive- cf? 7---- ,., 'sues= 747 i 1.,1 .1 ,' ,5 '‘• i r r., L..... ra . ----....-- -..... .... • - : r("\\•. , I /-"` . , ® SITE PLAN ENLARGED SITE PLAN .‘it CITY OF TIGARD t SDR2002-00010 CITY OF TIGARD SITE PLAN N CINGULAR WIRELESS MONOPOLE TOWER JMap is not to scale) 1110 1110 EXHIBIT B Salmon PCS, Inc. SDR2002-00010 123 NE Avenue, Suite 240 CINGULAR WIRELESS MONOPOLE TOWER @ Portland, OR 97232 DURHAM TREATMENT PLANT Mericom Corporation Attn: Chris Tigh 2701 NW Vaughn Street Portland, OR 97210 Clean Water Services 155 N. First Avenue, Suite 270 Hillsboro, OR 97124 t„ CITY OF TIGARD 0"o14:► ` Cdr ENT PLANNING Jul Jul-8'02 * ' 0 .1/ 1 .. J SW HALL BLVD r� R i iur, s , OR 97223 ° 8" ;`k RA.• SCHOOL DISTRICT 23J 13137 SW PACIFIC HWY TIGARD, OR 97223 Fa �q } i �1,{��1��lt�l�1��1+It�li,ll�iilltt t, yyti t,iiltit yiyt I t itr��f ttl�t�ttitettiltfitt�tlttittltltitittt:+I� . '_ ._ .., A_ Q.._ ‘._ % t ki. ,13,,, , ..,...) , ,-- , „ ,_,.. Lk ), , \ CITY OF TIGARD �ARo � °--- 13125 S.W. Hall Blvd. Tigard, Oregon 97223 JUL-6'02 i it g r z 0 .0 3 _ 1:,#1.03 Attn: Current Planning OR -_ ��u EnTCR U.S.POSTAGE q ' * JUL-6'02 �� 0 .J 4 ~ * 0 R P:'"T" U.S.POSTAGE ** 3359990 * Mericom Corporation Attn: Chris Tigh 2701 NW Vaughn Street i - Portland, OR 97210 I L.;_ iLF 7 .37 2 r 3+ ..714-112.21....*8 1 iiitWJ Iiiiiii111,11 ,imilii la \ tzt\sCl. -‘,... 'S O .-.t 0. -V:7-Z. .,3 • / i E-= _7 v.- .a1 .amp,. — t CITY OF TIGARD \�;�,�° +r- 13125 S.W. Hall Blvd. JUL 12'02 ,, 0 .3 7 Tigard,Oregon 97223 } v• p R Pa METER U.S.POSTAGE 8359996 * Attn: Current Planning coe _ --______________. Oit'-' al..).' 0.1(ACt 112 I -------->-l ' k i- (1,41),pc v 6 05) / DURHAM CITY OF \ ...- 17160 SW UPR BOON FY RD / � �� ■� TIGARD, OR-9-7223 1 ' t .r,,=,iiLC . • - r V F "J?7 S1 2.2Z-11VVIt .'-1�'.r?:c,tr q ii#91l1! N3 1!!!l!inr Llitittllc!!!!!:Ll1ll141hY1l1mII 1 1111 I11lll!!?i!!?!I • .w : -ice I■r,■■■■■• "'TEA A tuna w t— !•!.•w■■I W . �� •��:,..,.xy � � — ��+- ♦ CITY of T I G A R D 1h4411. . _� - .1.111■■■■■ 1 ,ir, ;,y 1111111 X11■■■■■■•,,,' GEOGRAPHIC INFORMATiON SYSTEM mon 4 4.:.., 11' ' &A �� m �� AREA NOTIFIED•-.V14 01111611 V WO grAIRIE = Wm 4.14. i A h 0 151.4 Er *MI X111111 IIIII //' ■6 �� a m 4P� /1111111 y mall n mallin 111111111111 _ 111 lllll ■��`��,Allyn ... IC Ilidi - M "'' sa"L��i•... <■ ' ■�10 ou 4min : E ....=4; . 2i�I+tT.1.rte. _. 111111 i11111111111-■o, • I 7'.M.///11111 ■aii0 1■Illll --AMP ■M Iliii ■r te-. *.- '.��IIIU� 7 - .6 .6a�� e� �' ■" / FOR: Ed Fourmier 'Bum ....... PI IT Illi � '' RE: 2S 113 B0, 00600 111111_ 11111111 ; ,')..iii i = sMrana n, Property owner information t 'lie ENE D "'"'"ae1' ;✓'. is valid for 3 months from 111101rellial .!, ',; 4� the date printed on this map. Mt 0 litNINNIO p amoilgiiili O ll#,II ■ • mmilimmum A "e'r vg,,ellin III '-,.. -, 4„.. �•m, 0 400 800 1200 Feet 0■ a� i.^. t'=774 feet 0151191.4 Rjr41110"..411 1}1 allillig If '1.1 Vi * anlinill.w 'I111;llt AI;,;11,ZI . City of Tigard IEILIIWI If ' (503)639-4777 �� "�u"' httpllwv.w.d.tigard.or.us Community Development Plot date:May 3,2002;C:lmagic\MAGIC03.APR 2S 112CC-01300 2S 113BA-00600 ADDINGTON JAMES P&YVONNE L CLEAN WATE ERVICES 17000 SW BROOKMAN RD 155 N FIRS VE STE 270 PO BOX 545 HILLSB 0,0 7124 SHERWOOD,OR 97140 2S 112CC-07100 2S 113B0-00600 ALEXANDER JOSEPH F&SALLY H CLEAN W T SERVICES 15785 SW 82ND AVE 155 N FIR VE STE 270 TIGARD,OR 97224 HILLSB 0,0 97124 2S 112CC-14500 2S 114AA-00400 BARKER BRUCE D&SUSAN L CLEAN WAT SERVICES 20700 COUGAR HILLS LN 155 N Fl AVE STE 270 HILLSBORO,OR 97123 HILLSBO 97124 2S113BD-00200 25114AA-00500 BARTLETT EDWARD ALONZO TRUST CLEAN WATE SERVICES BY KENNETH L BAKER 155 N FIR T VE STE 270 10121 SE SUNNYSIDE RD STE 325 HILLSBO , R 97124 CLACKAMAS,OR 97015 2S112CC-05200 2S114AA-00600 BAUSTIEN WILLIAM S&KRISTEN B CLEAN W TER SERVICES 8070 SW BOND ST 155 N T AVE STE 270 TIGARD,OR 97224 HILLSB O,OR 97124 2S112CC-01800 25114AD-00200 BENJAMIN JUDITH A CLEAN W T SERVICES 15965 SW 81ST CT 155 N FIRS VE STE 270 TIGARD,OR 97224 HILLSBOR , 97124 2S 112CC-01801 2S 114AD-00100• BOWEN RICHARD L CLEAN T R SERVICES BY FARMERS INS AGENCY 155 N FIR VE STE 270 2023 LLOYD CENTER HILLSBO O, R 97124 PORTLAND,OR 97232 25111 DD-12000 25114AD-00300 BRAUER JOEL J AND CLEAN T jR SERVICES ROBERTA L 155 N FIRS AVE STE 270 8550 SW AVON ST HILLSBO , R 97124 TIGARD,OR 97224 2S111DD-10700 2S11 C-01 0 BREWER JOSEPH A III&STEPHANIE COLLI JOYCE 8610 SW STRATFORD CT 8255 S NECA ST TIGARD,OR 97224 TUALA IN,OR 97062 2S114DA-00100 2S112CC-01400 CLEAN WATER SERVICES COL N JOYCE C 155 N FIRST AVE STE 270 825 SENECA ST HILLSBORO,OR 97124 TUALATI ,OR 97062 2S 112CC-06600 2S 112CC-05500 CROUSE RICHARD L ESPOSITO MICHAEL F&SHARON M 8085 SW BOND ST 8132 SW BOND ST TIGARD,OR 97224 TIGARD,OR 97224 2S112CC-07200 2S112CC-00200 DALLAS ERIC G& GAGE DOROTHY DARLENE CARRIE M GAGE M A ABRECHT M G 15773 SW 82ND AVE 8000 SW 54TH AVE TIGARD, OR 97224 PORTLAND,OR 97219 2S 113B0-02200 2S111DD-10000 DURHAM CITY OF GARCIA JOSE C& PO BOX 23483 BAILON ROMAN DURHAM,OR 97281 8635 SW STRATFORD CT TIGARD,OR 97224 2S1 13 B D-00300 2S 112C C-05000 DURHAM CITY OF HAGAN ELIZABETH R TRUSTEE 17160 SW UPR BOONES FY RD 8020 SW BOND ST TIGARD,OR 97223 TIGARD,OR 97224 2S113CB-07700 2S11200-14600 DURHAM CITY OF HOFFART FAMILY PROPERTIES LLC PO BOX 23483 4632 SW VERMONT ST DURHAM, OR 97281 PORTLAND,OR 97219 2S113BD-0 400 2S112CQ-1010 DU A CITY OF HOFFAR AMILY PROPERTIES LLC PO BO 483 4632 S V MONT ST DUR AM, OR 97281 PORTLAND,OR 97219 2S113B0-00400 2S112C -158 0 DURHAM I LLC HOFFA AMILY PROPERTIES LLC 8100 SW DURHAM RD 4632 S RMONT ST TIGARD,OR 97224 PORTLAND,OR 97219 2S 113B0-00500 2S 112CC-13900 DUR I LLC HOFFA T�AMILY PROPERTIES LLC 8100 URHAM RD 4632 SW RMONT ST TIGA D,O 97244 PORTL ND, R 97219 2S1 2CC 6400 2S112CC-15400 DUR M SCHOOL PARK OWNERS OF HOFF T AMILY PROPERTIES LLC LOT 11 6 4632 SW RMONT ST , 0 PORTL ND,OR 97219 2S?12CC-16300 2S112CC-14800 DUR SCHOOL PARK OWNERS OF HOF RT HERBERT J LOT 5- 4632 S ERMONT ST , 6 PORT N OR 97219 2S112CC-15100 2S112CC-15600 HOFFART HERBERT J HOFFART HERBERT J 4632 S VERMONT ST 4632 SW ERMONT ST PORTLAIV�,OR 97219 PORTLMJN OR 97219 2S 112CC-14700 2S 112CC-16000 HOFFA T RBERT J HOFFART HERBERT J 4632 SW MONT ST 4632 S RMONT ST PORTLA D, R 97219 PORTLEE,OR 97219 2S112CC-15300 2S112CC-15700 HOFFA ERBERT J HOFFART 4ERBERT J 4632 SMONT ST 4632 SW ft�RMONT ST PORTL ND,OR 97219 PORTL D,OR 97219 2S 112CC-15000. 2S112CC-16100 HOFFARBERT J HOFFART H RBERT J 4632 SW V ONT ST 4632 S RMONT ST PORTLAND,OR 97219 PORTL ,OR 97219 2S112CC-15200 2S112CC-16200 HOFFART j-IE,F�BERT J HOFF R HERBERT J 4632 SW V ONT ST 4632 S VERMONT ST PORTLAND,OR 97219 PORT N ,OR 97219 2S1 12CC-14100 2S 111 DD-07500 HOFFART HERBERT J HORNE BRIAN D/CAROLYN K 4632 SLpRMONT ST 8515 SW AVON ST PORT D, R 97219 TIGARD,OR 97224 2S112CC-15900 25111 DD-10300 HOFFART HERBERT J HUBER MICHAEL LEE 4632 SVIERMONT ST 1170 OXFORD DR PORTLAND,OR 97219 LAKE OSWEGO,OR 97034 25112CC-14900 25111DD-10400 HOFFA HERBERT J HUTCHINSON MARK S& 4632 SWV MONT ST MIDSON CLARE N PORTLAND,OR 97219 8550 SW STRATFORD CT TIGARD,OR 97224 2S112CC-14200 2S111 DD-10100 HOFFART HERBERT J JUNGKIND DEBORAH MARGARET& 4632 SW RMONT ST JUNGLIND ROSE MARIE PORTLAND,OR 97219 10820 SW SUMMER LAKE DR TIGARD,OR 97223 2S112CC-14000 2S112CC-06200 HOFF T HERBERT J JUNGWIRTH CAROL JENSEN 4632 SERMONT ST 15921 SW 81ST CT PORTLANI,OR 97219 TIGARD,OR 97224 2S 112CC-05300 2S112CC-06100 KAELIN KRISTOFER R& NICOLICH CINDY L REBECCA 15943 SW 81ST CT 8090 SW BOND ST PORTLAND,OR 97224 TIGARD,OR 97224 2S1 12C C-06300 2S 111 D D-12300 KEEFER DAN M&TYLER A NIELSEN MARY C 15889 SW 81ST CT PO BOX 1811 TIGARD,OR 97224 LAKE OSWEGO,OR 97035 2S112CC-05100 25111 DD-12100 KIRKPATRICK DEAN L& O'DONNELL CAROLYN M CHRISTINA L 8538 SW AVON 8050 SW BOND ST TIGARD,OR 97224 TIGARD,OR 97224 2S112CC-01600 2S11200-14400 KNEBEL WERNER&INGE B OLSON DENNIS M& 7483 SW ASHFORD ST MARILYN J TIGARD, OR 97224 18820 SW TUALATA AVE LAKE OSWEGO,OR 97035 2S 111 DD-11900 2S 112CC-14300 KNUDSON ROSALIE J OLSON RONALD D& 8602 SW AVON ST LINDA A TIGARD,OR 97224 3297 SW LAKE GROVE AVE LAKE OSWEGO,OR 97035 2311200-06500 2S 113BA-00400 LAMBING SCOTT M& OPUS NORTHWEST LLC ADRIENNE DORSCH 915 118TH AVE SE STE 300 15845 SW 81ST CT BELLEVUE,WA 98005 TIGARD,OR 97224 2S 112CC-06900 2S 11200-05600 LEE DAVID M&LORI R PATEL RAJENDRA J 8210 SW PATTI LN 8154 SW BOND ST TIGARD,OR 97224 TIGARD,OR 97224 2S 112CC-15500 2S 11200-07000 MCCLURE ELISE PORTER TAU&LISA R 7726 21ST AVE NE 8222 SW PATTI LN SEATTLE, WA 98115 TIGARD,OR 97224 2S1 11 DD-12200 2S11200-05800 MITCHELL MICHAEL G&MARGARET E ROGERS CYNTHIA R 8526 SW AVON ST 15932 SW 81ST CT TIGARD,OR 97224 TIGARD,OR 97224 2S 11200-05900 2S1 11 D D-00201 NEWBERRY MICHAEL H ROSEHILL INVESTMENTS LLC 15954 SW 81ST CT 2001 SIXTH AVE STE 2300 TIGARD,OR 97224 SEATTLE,WA 98121 2S1 12C C-01701 2S 113BA-00700 SATTLER MURIEL I &EDWARD J TRS TAYLOR MARY L QUALIFIED 13360 SW MORGAN RD PERSONAL RESIDENCE TRUST NO.1 SHERWOOD,OR 97140 16565 SW UPPER BOONES FERRY RD TIGARD,OR 97224 2S112C 001700 2S112CC-01100 SATTLER RIEL I &EDWARD J TRS TIGARD FRIENDS CHURCH 13360 S GAN RD 7130 SW BEVELAND SHERWOOD,OR 97140 TIGARD,OR 97223 2S112CC-06000 2S113BA-00401 SAYLER DEBORAH A TIGARD SCHOOL DISTRICT 13500 SW PACIFIC HWY#442 NO 23J TIGARD, OR 97223 6960 SW SANDBURG ST TIGARD,OR 97223 2S114AA-00100 2S1130A-00500 SCHOOL DISTRICT 23J TIGARD-TUALATIN SCHOOL 13137 SW PACIFIC HWY DISTRICT 23J TIGARD, OR 97223 ATTN:BUSINESS MANAGER 6960 SW SANDBURG ST TIGARD,OR 97223 2511360-00 00 2S111DD-10800 SCH (STRICT NO 23J TUMBLESON SCOTT V& 13137 PACIFIC HWY DANETTE M TIGARD,0 97123 8630 SW STRATFORD CT TIGARD,OR 97224 2S114AA-00300 2S112CC-05700 SHIPMAN W H LIMITED VICKREY L EDWARD BY NORRIS&STEVENS 15910 SW 81ST CT 520 SW 6TH AVE#400 TIGARD,OR 97224 PORTLAND,OR 2S114AA-00 0 2S112CC-01804 SHIP A H LIMITED WATT DOUGLAS A&KATIE S BY NO IS&STEVENS 15987 SW 81ST CT 520 S 6TH AVE#400 TIGARD,OR 97224 PORTLAND,OR 2S 112CC-06400 2S 112CC-05400 SHUGAR ALLAN L WEIJO RICHARD 0 TR& 15867 SW 81ST CT WEIJO SHARON K TR TIGARD,OR 97223 8110 SW BOND TIGARD,OR 97224 2S 111 DD-09900 25111 DD-10600 SMITH BARRY F& WYSS SCOTT C AND PAMELA J ELMER LYNN T 8590 SW STRATFORD CT 8655 SW STRATFORD CT TIGARD,OR 97224 TIGARD, OR 97223 2S11100-10200 2S 111 DD-10500 SNYDER DAN A&DARLENE A YOUNG BRUCE H&WANDA E 8585 SW STRATFORD CT 8570 SW STRATFORD CT TIGARD,OR 97224 TIGARD,OR 97224 Jack Biethan 11023 SW Summerfield Drive, #4 Tigard, OR 97224 Kristen Miller 8940 SW Edgewood Street Tigard, OR 97223 Paul Owen 10335 SW Highland Drive Tigard, OR 97224 Louise Fronville 15760 SW Oak Meadow Lane Tigard, OR 97224 Tim Esav PO Box 230695 Tigard, OR 97281 Nathan and Ann Murdock PO Box 231265 Tigard, OR 97281 Ross Sundberg 16382 SW 104th Avenue Tigard, OR 97224 Brian Wegener 9830 SW Kimberly Drive Tigard, OR 97224 CITY OF TIGARD - SOUTH CIT SUBCOMMITTEE (pg. I of I) (i:\curpin\setup\labels\CIT South.doc) UPDATED: April 18, 2002 uy. ivieilcum Lorp. budouodUU1 ; 05/02/"' 12:01PM;)eLFa.c #82Y;Page 1 /2 • CITY OF TIGARD COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT YELOPMENT DEPARTMENT 4l,/V. PLANNING DIVISION CITY Of TIGARD Community'Dev 13125 SW HALL BOULEVARD e(opment S1apingA Better Community TIGARD, OREGON 91223 PHONE: 503-639-4171 FAX: 503-684-7297(Attn: Patty or Shirley/Planning) REQUEST FOR 500 SOOTI ' OP �a A LIST Property owner information is valid for 3 months from the date of your request INDICATE ALL PROJECT MAP & TAX LOT NUMBERS (i.e. ISI34AB, Tax Lot 00100) OR THE ADDRESSES FOR ALL PROJECT PARCELS BELOW and INCLUDE A MAP OF ALL LOTS FOR THE PROJECT (preferably assessor's tax map): ---��- s A ( e (e A+`-t Set-v,-(-t Leo (ZA_ ()AD INDICATE WHETHER YOU ARE REQUESTING 2 OR 3 SETS OF LABELS: (NOTE: A minimum of 2 sets of labels will be provided to place on your 2 sets of envelopes that applicants are required to submit at the time of application submittal. If a neighborhood meeting is required and you have not yet held that meeting, you should request 3 sets) NAME OF CONTACT PERSON: t-J F L P4k-t tz L PHONE: This request may be mailed, faxed, or hand delivered to the City of Tigard. Please allow a 2-day minimum for processing requests. Upon completion of your request, the contact person will be called to pick up their request in "Will Call" by their last name, at the Community Development Reception Desk. The cost of processing your request must be paid at the time of pick up, as exact cost can not be pre-determined. PLEASE NOTE: FOR REASONS OF ACCURACY, ONLY ORIGINAL MAILING LABELS PROVIDED BY THE CITY VS. RE–TYPED MAILING LABELS WILL BE ACCEPTED. Cost Description: $11 to generate the mailing list, plus $2 per sheet for printing the list onto labels (20 addresses per sheet). Then, multiply the cost to print one set of labels by the number of sets requested. *EXAMPLE* * * COST FOR THIS REQUEST * * sheets of labels x $2/sheet = $8.00 x sets = $16.00 sheet(s) of labels x S2/sheet = x_ 3 sets = $3Q 2. sheets of labels x$2/sheet for CIT area x sets = $ 4.00 /- sheet(s) of labels x $2/sheet for CIT area = x 2 sets = $ y GENERATE LIST = GENERATE LIST = $1110_ TOTAL = $31.00 TOTAL = $45- oeiil uy. iviert�vw iU1 - . 3UJJU.JUUI ; U5/UY�"� IL:UIrM;Jr8R �rn� rage zi[ Page 1 of 1 e[ Tax Assessment Details Tax Lot Account Numbers Map 1 xs*. .., . $'Sty F { pe- 2...,�:..t w z i 35 - ti.., 1 =�. Taxlot Number 2S 113B000600 A,),..4,41::-`~ ° v r ..._i4 , � 4 t ter ;-.. `- Mult. Co. Alt. Accountr;� :_ i `-3� , 1 - 4 1s ' .37 .,- No. Y'; .'_ = � > saa �,�--- �¢ it il Approx. Taxlot � � " _:} _. ,:w t Size 50.61 acres rt��s�xy s,�. � =: ,fYu ▪F S =1:1-.17::U.;- :" i -mo € ,,' z_. Site Address a° ,� ▪ 3 —5 a r 1 °. 0 Y } j Tl T L'i-AInt.f: g.,„II: 'L' r. +�C 4 - _': _-^ )-1� 'fie E C - �e''� +�. rte ::_ " _ =} ..tt�- �3rW.9 — Lv.. if. Last Deed Change . R s i .: Sale Date . ss� _ r1 Sale Amount $0.00 ,`: -T -7- .,,, .- „,1_.*; „1 - ~ Market Value Site & Structure Information Land $5,465,690.00 Land Use 0 sqft Vacant Building $0.00 Building Area Total $5,465,690.00 Year Built 0 Service Provider Parks City of Tigard Water City of Tigard Sewer Unified Sewerage Agency Fire Protection Tualatin Valley Fire&Rescue School Tigard School Dist. http://ma.../plan_pub_taxlotdetail.cfm?x=7620990&y=641375&idlyr=10284&TLID=2S 113B00060 1/11/2002 , C -E--C3 SITE DEVELOPMENT REVIEW rid'!" TYPE II APPLICATION CITY OF TIGARD 13125 SW Nall Blvd., Tigard, OR 97223(503) 639-4171 FAX:(503) 684-7297 49i6X6a J-A OTD 0 GENERAL INFORMATION PRE-APP. HELD WITH: DATE OF PRE-APP.: E iia Property Address/Location(s) 1 16580 SW 85th Ave FOR STAFF USE ONLY • • Tax Map &Tax Lot#(s) 2S113B0-00600 Case No'(s): . b . O.. r Other Case No:0): A. ''.Receipt No.: � � &. Site Size: 50 AC - •• ;: pp-0 t(on-�� Cce ted y; .�t . . Salmon PCS, LLC; Mericom Corp as Agent Applicant*: Rdt;�: ': . . Address: 25977 SW Canyon Creek Road, Suite E g Wilsonville, OR 97070 D.ateDetrr, iq`Complete: t City/State: Zip: /2001 lrnas do0: Ed Fournier "�' Primary Contact: Phone: 503-303-3012 Fax: 503-303-3001 REQUIRED SUBMITTAL ELEMENTS Property Owner/Deed Holder(s)*: (Attach list if more than one) I (Note: applications will not be accepted Clean Water Services without the required submittal elements) Address: 16060 SW 85th Ave Phone:503-684-4617 i Application Form City/State: Tigard, OR Zip: 97224 I Owner's Signature/Written Authorization [�7 Title Transfer Instrument or Deed * When the owner and the applicant are different people, the applicant j (� Copy of Pre-Application Conf. Notes must be the purchaser of record or a lessee in possession with written authorization from the owner or an agent of the owner. The owner(s) Site/Plot Plan must sign this application in the space provided on the back of this (#of copies based on pre-app check list) form or submit a written authorization with this application. Site/Plot Plan (reduced 8'/1"x 11") PROPOSAL SUMMARY lr. Applicant's Statemen (#of copies hased on pre-app check list) The owners of record of the subject property request Site rt WS Sewer Use Information Card Development Review approval to allow (please be specific): tributed/cornpleted at application submittal) Construction of a 100' mono-pole and place equipment inside CWS Service Provider Letter a proposed fenced equipment compound. 2 Sets of Pre-Addressed/Pre-Stamped #10 Envelopes & Copy of 500' Property / Owner List Generated by the City iC Neighborhood Mtg.Affidavits & Notes i FAing F as s1 ,000} $ 80040 .00assss, ,fi0-0.00 (st Million a Over) $1,780.00 (a S 5141(1.M0 ewer u+a first minu+n Urban: (See Washington County fee schedule) 1 -6, 'i3S ( 4. 1..c. >- c S wv�n 3. b,L,e i w:tk wcA_ vT- _cte\t 6441_ • List any VARIANCE, CONDITIONAL USE, SENSITIVE LANDS, OR OTHER LAND USE ACTIONS to be considered as part of this application: - none - APPLICANTS: To consider an application complete, you will need to submit ALL of the REQUIRED SUBMITTAL ELEMENTS as described on the front of this application in the"Required Submittal Elements" box. (Detailed Submittal Requirement Information sheets can be obtained, upon request,for all types of Land Use Applications.) THE APPLICANT(S) SHALL CERTIFY THAT: ♦ The above request does not violate any deed restrictions that may be attached to or imposed upon the subject property. • If the application is granted, the applicant will exercise the rights granted in accordance with the terms and subject to all the conditions and limitations of the approval. • All of the above statements and the statements in the plot plan, attachments, and exhibits transmitted herewith, are true; and the applicants so acknowledge that any permit issued, based on this application, may be revoked if it is found that any such statements are false. • The applicant has read the entire contents of the application, including the policies and criteria, and understands the requirements for approving or denying the application. SIGNATURES of each owner of the subject property. DATED this day of _ ,20 See attached Owner's Authorization Owner's Signature Owner's Signature Owner's Signature Owner's Signature a Title Transfer Instrument or Deed And Owner Authorization letter Received: 2/ 6/02 11 :16AM: -> Merlcom Corp. ; Page 41 Sent by: CHICAGO TITLE 5036537853; 02/061 12:52PM;JetFax #682;Page 39/40 _... ,..-..•�.r ;,. t , ......,....`mc-^.mow.-n•t.vuw. .. /7 6•' +i !,., !"T L t. rAr - j XNOh' ALL MEN DY rii.-SL PRESENTS, rhet .lndraw alai Harriet A. Stt[tuick •,1,1 ' e� �; h . , I:i-reinc:f(rr v..hied rho e°r6,,cn' for(ha can.uJ-' rion hereinafter stated, ••• ' r , , •`>f--rt:r d ��, Unified Sewer:l e. Agency ; Z' j7. I to�+retrlror paid by . K oC Woahl.ngiort County ' •.•e ,j:I�' ,qty .. ,. .... ....... .. ;.. •-" ;• �y st0 \. i •• .. . ... . .... , hereinafter celled Ors grantee. `e'',' ^r. "C' 1 � II dues hereby grant, bargain,soh ark/convey urro the s,'+id grantee and grantee's he+r:l• succ.J.or's and assign;., that I. :••' ' "` :�F.,-?! ' C, '' ?I certain ma of op riy, with tht tenements,hereditament* and rppu:torisnces rhrraunro belunging or arperruiring sit• " " - t. ,I Cared in the County f Washington. 't`� ��:fi�`:`u�''sY•'•.ti;c' .. �i, Y G - and Stara n! Cregon,described o.follows,re-wit: ° �;: ,-. :,�,.s:� tt.«,!"_, z� II A t:set of lur,d in Section 13, Township 2 South, Range. 1 West. of tit:; Willamette Mcridisa, - .1': •:71�•' Z 1: :•: .. r;.,:= �}`n,�.2s,�'• 1- Washington County, OreSon, more particularly described as follows; 1, r":•�:�-;•z�Y '` .xY'.«'�' a1rive 't 3e'innin at the, Northwest- corner of Section 13 'Township 2 South Range 1 ;WesC and �h..1�.:c')^-eft. I K !> . , B r ii ;i :=..;n,. -`Ei:�q.=;,�;;�:,,' !�� ji sussing thane,the, 562,5 feet to the tiotL'hvesc corner of a-certain tract convoyed Co 11 1Y'x'i-�'>�i r,r ''r{ �-r. 1t 1 Varian 1.1.marwell . ux a deed recorded in Book 275 '-t �oylr'x�ss .n.. �I y pages 5131; thence.East along the ij. '.:,'�'4s•.% f..a . A. ,'i'i., ,,y v.i i •Nor1:h 1 ine of =aid Ma:cwel l tract to the West lino of a 30-foot roadway, which "0-foot � : - 44`. ..•t .': f I readw•1y !s l!esc.ribttd as being'31 rods Fast of the Wept line of $0id Section 13; thence 5. a.`:.t, , :1,.• ti, ji North along the l;esr, line of said roadway [to n goint on the North line of said Section' '.;i+r:, .J�' ,. ,`II I3; thence hest 31 Rad. :o the iota of beginning; EXCEPTING THEREFROM the f:ellovin , ��= i''``'�•••1`+ "l III described tract; 3eginning nt the Northwest corner of section 13; running thence South •' `.r ?• : �Irya:;�_.�r .;:; t t•. • I; along said section line, 262,5 fe t; thence Nast and parallel 1'o the North line of Section r %w; .v,%.. fir. ..ice• 1 +- rt,• LA . , t�_ ' 13, s distance of 356,5 fear;• thence Po-th ncrallel t.• the west line of said Section 13, 1. -'' s/1l .• a'Si' ") ; a distance of 262,5 feet to the Korth line of Section 13; thence :lest to the place of ". ,l;,t,; .`.i 'S ;�; .L' `s4• beginning, =' W pr ' 1.'t" !I SUBJECT Z0: Stetutoty powers and assessment, of Unified Sewerage Agency and right.i of the habit, ' in and to an or t ion ,Jt►,,7 (.�1t rrlclt"'f•Corn.NUt ISfSte.tlr0�t ON r.�E E raft 1 t !+" '�`.g R Lai T P 1 . the irl a Ui rho f grantee r s ■ oi, tnk ttva a. (" ''.'''+'-'- in I: (1Z-' l `+" , a:h'are and!�7i�lc the:amt urs/o tho sal grantee an�grrintae s tc.rs.s�icces,urs and assigns forever. r'i.:: q'•Y,I'. ,,,,Ali G +I An41 said grcintur hereby coveneolr to and with said yrrnrtfee and grantee's Fairs,succc.x+•rs and es:.jns, met ,•: :`. '.:+'yj '1 .14N-1. 1 grantor iss.lawfully seised in lee simple of the above granted premises, tee_ from all crrcr:nebrcnees • tear.. t`-• ; ^; 4 t I '.0`t.'t .." •,. . a . I y , ;: :y ie a - ., IIII �1. yil.kr_. .;Yi I • is`rf_j") :.t::•'I': z , t'+T, .4.'.•:' I arty/the: .;T a,r.: r ;��,y�y��j,,�,.-i- g►antor will warrant and forever defend ehc above granted pr-Tine,and every parr end parcel thereof against rlre lol:- .. � !i*-511 C .�a, • I ♦Z`ri rye "��;,., d ; fat chines;and demands of al persons whomsoavcr,except those claiming under. the above described encuni.s.-ances. 1'"t'.::;.''--:+ 'o••-} r;WE(..a-i I • The.true and actual con,ide(e►l•' paid for this transfer,stated in ferr+u of dollars, is t F' ai;.'::c:a, .,,,.!.....;•••„•,,i'+!�* :ik;`�'1 .44.to tiwN`i•finr»xdrei•r.nskitw town krsFer. ..(erdas,dkai.- rclsr4Y wamr;ii..s'o r ii.„y :e II. psrael+clwr -. �iaiyar.it:vvs<.i-,.>ruMSlisad_ +';..,a. at. r..,e..,. �s•:, .leryy'r,r_. .: s4dieelreiu!accS�1L �.; T� _:•.•Y 11` 4 `3y,n,��i _ •In construing this deed and wh.rI ilk: contest ao requires, do singular includes thy piwrat• •�t +ti+= ,+fit.y4L.J.";.;', _ _ WITNESS ...sot's hand this 77....' day of .� . ... r:r; _ f grant is d d �' t<en+4t� 1st7� ` �r w1:,. ' +'h �i .^ . G•J1_`44 7-•' 'LyLe•U`LG .C:Yv..a : • -?�:i�1rr}�: s'`�F� A.1(11-1.W Sdct`WiCk A t.'•%,�Tlr:r, -r ` 1 ;V ;1 �./�^ivL Yt,t4 �Z �,re,•lbw-rlil .....4...,-4.•...•e•::::•,yy.. ,. ) K^ ' 2i...4:1' bet �'- r[}t II Harriet. A. Ssltv_ck .. ='"' ' ts.ti ,r,ig ,'!c.''.CJ . l' STATE O OFIECON, (nl+•!h. 6,-- ,c ' ;r;�,` Z.; ' {f¢'4 t.,:t;er. l i J° County of `Z .a. �cc� b:� 'i !p 71 • G:.,.• •, . . t.+r ra �tA�1( . I� Perap:taliy n;.posred the. ,7but•a tnr•,led A.11 re.. SH1tw:ck ant Iiare.cl sl -5 a/f :ck �.::' %:•ri;r'i 'r � R. .- - and ccknowied ed the foreA,si !instr,:. t r ■y. _ - c. ' -a `` y.l ;• :••�▪ ; M .et�~ II � r. Tl!r.r !O hi' 1 G. _ r-- J Jl:n for}' art,:fad.'. /. '-.• �,+• 4:M�pi.` ��'.yii r Refote one:�•. ,/i•c-,'.�,-,-_'�' //�/� �,, 1)` . ' ' `r...•, :L- '4 .4,01'�19y.-sd (0.,FiCiat $sal-) -' Notary Public it Orego-i :r'n_tix t..:•+ � fY ;a l :r; My comouss+wr crpirea ,.1.. �,:yox-ice;• , ;;5 1-, ,`' i. ire - 1 ^ _ Nett-tM••.,«+..N iM.era.M.t ta•ei N w.....anwo.M,.le M 44.44.,I. Wrhii N7.O,.er lwl I W,o.aryA.i rM _ 1+ •-"tt}•r '�c t t 'r / , ." � Irt.Ow 1 W i Nd aw.:w.. � ��t 'zr .: r ll'WARRAN_Y DEED' : '� - k,4. ,. 3-iL f `` i :R; ./�- 1 I STATE OF O3EGON• .� Z `�-:,_� .�', t�r tight l'. I ,U'f'JAEW S Ce...+w .,I We•Ai,t:.. L",'^.'*: ::. 'ti'urL`.e t�'I'{,'�-• '+y�°i' I I ,'. - "` I. Rya:. 7 t iv �r ".f m Ctae • 1 y r„"l To l�I.4`•t'�•+' Elc;lii,nt c;n4 C.01 tic's) %.•,:•err e% Core .. c cr" ::,l. as.-et,},. S rnaa r,...sots vc�Cnrrs Iqr w�J G.ur'.r,, CA. ,:r.•r/ ureh' e..-r�'i:.•`: ♦rylfrill -Yit 4{dell - •..2•1 , `�'Tr, . ' ..... It 1� SP/PAGE At`i Ellbl�, I Ih N1 bin i� me "''''-r,'--'? Z-..-'6.17",'sr r.= NI L.Q ,r e.. Caoutp o- dw e I nt of wr;t•, ws :sas s. �: :rJ uur��,^��r• �""l 326 E. Lincoln St. 1` rc�•.eca.urro +�.•1••.J and frro•eol -'O :Vol: nt 4:M - '�� ''`� r� l,.4i 1 '� 1 l••Gi.•M cow, ...... + • r is 1 ,.�,.:.11111atreir art8, 1Z1Zr NO '-n �CCO?DfNO rle St:7N i0 1 +cca 1 7y I.°P y� .t' 1111-, 1\:�I:�.t:CF. r.2'� :ANY 1 SV.:n_:,r.... L.ar..l anJ _..t• •.t:�,.�. �•- I1 ;q ! f i GEa ( C�sS i£N, O-'eci r vl N 4• '. .tit- 1 11 S �I -•a ktm¢: L Clc".I.»: x/39°'P-6 s. S :-, ^ it .t I /oC _-45.,:r- *?�r]�t es,c a).a 3 ring' t1 1^�Ij i-' ":7c` e`a' i5ti.'=.!.-4 ..:,-4ti:.r ... 91 :.r2c1 P.v,.�r.>.r�J t. 7 4�r`{t'�� y ^r�.--e*;' Ali it's Received: 2/ 6/02 71 :16AM -> Mericom Corp. ; Page 42 Sent �y: CHICAGO TITLE 5036537853; 02/06, 12:52PM;jetFsac #682;Page 40/40 Li112 i t Il LD MY 2I? —awe ' T outer T A itoint c';-. 1 ( 500 300 600 I Ufa swag 1 le 1 • J�aa a. 600-MI I '.4,. ~ratlwit+rpr• 1 1 "I it_ ii I b • • 4 . 3 I Y r ; . i rej 1I2--°..— 4 eal.s I s s s • ur IgA-.a..._. ___ A.L4.1; — — :all t II I 1 I MY t G I ft • H I SEE MAP sees _> zs I 14A "•�' I! F in I las 23—?4 1 1 : . . 1 . . 1 al I _... m' I ' z, Is IE. w I Iii) • I I 041 N �A • 2 -78 CHICAGO 'w • • -Ills pial is nor your std ,f r-; , !o .g your land With iotorcrIce M 4e s and i; ar eV30 TO 23.87 rctrnocopvbj. G. _`' s no I r:r.dy fnr pny ,n.....: .-....• :4 /1.IIIP. - by r .450110T re;ia;:r 1•. ,..:, i 11C VED Si 73 ri • c;•lc.,..i4./:. . .... A 0 1...f, .� O �' Received: 2/11 /02 11 :17AM: -> Mericom Corp. ; Page 1 02/11/2002 12:11 503684, J PAGE 01/01 Mr. Edward F. Fournier c Fax4ole Mericom Corporation ��O�r. r Consultants to Cingular Wireless oei 4420 Rosewood Drive 2, 3rd Floor 0. - Pleasanton, CA 94588 Re: Letter of Authorization 4111.11**41/844 Dear Mr. Fournier: Pursuant to our mutual intent to pursue the possibility of locating telecommunications equipment on our facility,we agree to permit Salmon PCS LLC ("Salmon"), doing business as Cingular Wireless, and its agents, employees, and/or contractors, to access the facilities located at the Clean water Serviced Durham Facility at 16060 SW 85th Avenue, Tigard, Oregon. Please consider this letter as your authorization to enter the building and surrounding premises, and to proceed with necessary activities such as surveying, soil and radio frequency testing, zoning, permitting, and any title search required. It is our understanding that Salmon contractors and personnel will be licensed and insured for any work they will be performing, and that Salmon will hold harmless and indemnify the property owner from any and all actions and/or claims for damages resulting from the performance of these activities on said property. We also understand that Salmon will coordinate its efforts with us to minimize any inconvenience, disruptions and/or impairment of access to the property to us or any existing tenants. Please note that signing this agreement does not constitute a legally binding agreement to lease the facility, but rather your permission for the aforementioned access. Sincerely, / N © .56 i / ! ow a 7/„.4 �,'d r L LlJ/"f G.O 7t Name! II 0 lj✓ G�/V1U lJ4 I 46. Hk�s r Title: 2 _11- 6 2 P/e,,e 5-e1du. id. vg's /Is IV 4 - Date: r�,f3' 44 /,3auv .loeI aev,k. . 15 cingular WIRELESS Transmittal Cover Sheet To: Morgan Tracy Company: City of Tigard Community Development Dept. Phone: 503-639-4171 Fax: From: Chris Tigh Phone: 503-705-7536 Fax: 503-253-3822 Date: 7/2/02 Re: Tigard application no. SDR2002-00010 Dear Mr. Tracy: Attached are the 17 duplicate sets of the Site Development Review submittal materials you requested in your letter of June 26 to Ed Fournier. Please note that, following our recent internal reorganization of site assignments, this site has been transferred from Ed Fournier to myself. Henceforth, I will be the point of contact for this application, should you have any further questions or comments. I hope to be as thorough and professional in that regard as Mr. Fournier has been. Thank you for your help. We look forward to hearing from you when a decision is rendered. Cordially, Chris Tigh MERICOM' C ❑ R P O R A T I O N May 31, 2002 Mr. Morgan Tracy City of Tigard Community Development Department 13125 SW Hall Blvd. Tigard, OR 97223 RE: Salmon PCS new mono-pole; Site Development Review Dear Mr. Tracy: On behalf of Salmon PCS, I am submitting the following Type II Application for a Site Development Review to develop a new mono-pole and place equipment in a fenced compound to be located at 16580 SW 85th Avenue, Tigard, OR. Please find enclosed the following land use information: 3 Copies of the below listed, additional copies supplied upon being deemed complete: • Site Development Review Application form • Applicant's Statement • Site Plans • CWS Service Provider Letter • Title Transfer Instrument or Deed • Copy of Pre-application conference meeting notes • Neighborhood Meeting Affidavits & Notes Supplemental submittal items: • 8.5" x 11" Site Plans • CWS Sewer Use information Card — Completed at Application submittal • 2 sets of#10 pre addressed & stamped envelopes, per the City generated Owner list • Filing Fee: a check for $800 SDR Please feel free to contact me with any questions you may have. Thank you for your attention to this matter. Sincerely, MERICOM CORPORATION r Edwa d (Ed FT ournier Senior Project Manager Direct Line: 503/303-3012 E-Mail: Ed.Fournier@Mericom.com 25977 SW CANYON CREEK ROAD, SUITE E, WILSONVILLE, OREGON 97070, U.S.A. TELEPHONE: (503) 303-3000 / FAx: (503) 303-3001 CWS Pre-Screening Site Assessment Sent by: Mericom Corp. 'ID i ig3Y0 05/02/02 10:31AM;Je[Fa _#824;Page 1 /1 MAY 0 2 2002 File Number 1? n[3 C1eanWater Services Our commitment is Meat. Sensitive Area Pre-Screening Site Assessment Jurisdiction Date S•--2--p2 Map & Tax Lot `ZS J t& -i 3 SO 0©6c5 C) Owner CieA r•-t v,-c6) Site Address /Coo 6 o Sti- S i�l Do/ l44v— T(6 Ati3j, (4Q Contact ED FOU1Z44,ER Proposed Activity A- A- )00' Mo,vo Ve Address Z5?7 7 sly.) (A-NJ/tit(CK. - E tamer A� �e No-- _T'O rJ l,; VI LSD r-U i 11P( 02_77076 C en 10 � ck4ew,�c� � 13L) ;14(9 `' Phone 503 303--3 of 2 343-3ooe P4D( Y N NA Y N NA Sensitive Area Composite Map 1 f Stormwater Infrastructure maps Map # z5/w4 J l IN QS # 14-72 1 ( iv Locally adopted studies or maps = Other Specify Specify Based on a review of the above information and the requirements of Clean Water Services Design and Construction Standards Resolution and Order No. 00-7: li Sensitive areas potentially exist on site or within 200' of the site. THE APPLICANT MUST PERFORM A SITE CERTIFICATION PRIOR TO ISSUANCE OF A SERVICE PROVIDER LETTER OR STORMWATER CONNECTION PERMIT. If Sensitive Areas exist on the site or within 200 feet on adjacent properties, a Natural Resources Assessment Report may also be required. NI Sensitive areas do not appear to exist on site or within 200' of the site. This pre- screening site assessment does NOT eliminate the need to evaluate and protect water quality sensitive areas if they are subsequently discovered on your property. NO FURTHER SITE ASSESSMENT OR SERVICE PROVIDER LETTER IS REQUIRED. THIS FORM WILL SERVE AS AUTHORIZATION TO ISSUE A STORMWATER CONNECTION PERMIT. The proposed activity does not meet the definition of development. NO SITE ASSESSMENT OR SERVICE PROVIDER LETTER IS REQUIRED. Comments: ,� / ore4r:a((y Seris:ri✓e area.. off eG.o ro he w;r4;k2 Aoo/ O 7-4* /Qr .hyr Ater 41ir4i y IZ 00' o T "rof'eo r sire Reviewed By: Date: 5--6- U.Z Returned to Applicant Mail X Fax Counter Date 5- 7- G By 44- 155 N First Avenue,Suite 270•Hillsboro,Oregon 97124 Phone: (503)546-8621 • Fax: (503)846-3525•www.cicanwatcrservices.otg Neighborhood Meeting Affidavits & Notes NEIGHBORHOOD MEETING The required neighborhood meeting was held at 6pm on May 23rd, 2002 at the Tigard Friends Church, 15800 SW Hall Blvd., Tigard, OR. The copy of the notice letter, mailing list, affidavit of mailing and posting, meeting attendance sheet and meeting notes are attached. SITE DEVELOPMENT REVIEW (18.360) Chapter 18.360.020 Applicability of Provisions Per the proposed mono-pole development is not exempt from this Chapter. 18.360.030 Approval Process A. New developments and major modifications. The proposed development falls into this category and shall be approved via a Type II review process. 18.360.050 Major Modification(s) to Approved Plans or Existing Development A. Determination request. An applicant may request approval of a modification to an approved plan or existing development by- The applicant is proposing a development which is a permitted use in the IP zone, subject to a Type II Site Development Review Application. The required application and submittal materials comprise this request. 18.360.070 Submission Requirements A. General submission requirements. The applicant shall submit an application containing all of the general information required for a Type 11 procedure, as governed by Section 18.390.040. Please see the enclosed Type II application form. B. Additional information. In addition to the submission requirements required in Chapter 18.390, Decision-Making Procedures, an application for the conceptual development plan must include the following additional information in graphic, tabular and/or narrative form. The Director shall provide a list of the specific information to be included in each of the following:..... The required plans are subsequently listed in this Chapter. All required plans are attached to this application in the Site Plans section. 18.360.080 Exceptions to Standards B. Exceptions to parking requirements. The Director may grant an exception or deduction to the offstreet parking dimensional and minimum number of space requirements in the applicable zoning district based on the following findings: 1. The application is for a use designed for a specific purpose which is intended to be permanent in nature, e.g., senior citizen housing, and which has a demonstrated low demand for off-street parking; During construction or operation of the site, minimal traffic would be generated as a result of the facility. Once construction is completed, an equipment technician would visit the site approximately one time per month for routine maintenance purposes only. C. Exceptions for private or shared outdoor area...... This section of the Chapter is not applicable. D. Exceptions to landscaping requirements. The Director shall grant an exception to the landscaping requirements of this code, Section 18.120.150, upon finding that the overall landscape plan provides for at least 20% of the gross site to be landscaped. The development area shall be landscaped in accordance with applicable Chapters, and match the existing landscape plan established by Clean Water Services. 18.360.090 Approval Criteria A. Approval criteria. The Director shall make a finding with respect to each of the following criteria when approving, approving with conditions, or denying an application: 1. Compliance with all of the applicable requirements of this title including Chapter 18.810, Street and Utility Standards; Chapter 18.810 is addressed specifically above in its own narrative paragraph. 2. Relationship to the natural and physical environment: a. Buildings shall be• This Chapter is not applicable as no new buildings are proposed upon the site. b. Trees shall be preserved to the extent possible. Replacement of trees is subject to the requirements of Chapter 18.790, Tree Removal. All existing trees shall be preserved upon the site, and additional trees planted as required by Chapter 18.798. 3. Exterior elevations:.... This Chapter is not applicable as no new buildings are proposed upon the site. 4. Buffering, screening and compatibility between adjoining uses. Please see the below listed narrative addressing Chapter 18.745 Buffering and Screening. 5. Privacy and noise:multi-family or group living uses: through 11. Public transit: These Chapters are not applicable. 12. Landscaping: The parcel is currently developed as a sewer plant, and this Chapter was addressed during the approval of the original plant development. No changes to the previously approved landscaping are proposed. Wireless Communications Facilities are further governed by Chapter 18.798.050. Please see the attached narrative addressing these criteria specific to Wireless Communications Facilities. 13. Drainage:All drainage plans shall be designed in accordance with the criteria in the adopted 1981 master drainage plan; The parcel is currently developed as a sewer plant, and this Chapter was addressed during the approval of the original storage center development. No changes to the previously approved drainage are proposed. 14. Provision for the disabled:All facilities for the disabled shall be designed in accordance with the requirements set forth in ORS Chapter 447;and The parcel is currently developed as a sewer plant, and this Chapter was addressed during the approval of the original storage center development. No changes to the previously approved provisions for the disabled are proposed. 15. All of the provisions and regulations of the underlying zone shall apply unless modified by other sections or this title, e.g., Planned Developments, Chapter 18.350;or a variance or adjustment granted under Chapter 18.370. This proposed development complies with the applicable Section of the underlying IP zone. Exceptions are as permitted via Wireless Communications Facilities as governed by Chapter 18.798 IMPACT STUDY (Chapter 18.390) Impact to public facilities and services will be minimal. Access shall be via the existing paved parking lot from SW 85th Avenue. During construction or operation of the site, minimal traffic would be generated as a result of the facility. Once construction is completed, an equipment technician would visit the site approximately one time per month for routine maintenance purposes only. Telephone service and electrical power are the only public facilities required by the proposed site, and shall be arranged with the local service providers. Salmon's proposed site is an unmanned facility, and would not require any water, waste treatment or management of hazardous materials. No improvements to public facilities are needed to accommodate this development. INDUSTRIAL ZONING DISTRICTS (Chapter 18.530) In general this Chapter described allowable uses in Industrial Districts. Specifically, Chapter 18.530.030 (Table 18.530.1) lists Wireless Communications Facilities as a Permitted use, subject to Chapter 18.798. Table 18.520.2 lists numerical criteria for this District. While the proposed mono-pole development is specifically subject to Chapter 18.798, but please note that, the proposed development exceeds the setback requirements, and does not modify the landscaping nor site coverage percentages. Only the height of the proposed mono-pole (100')exceeds the underlying Zoning District (IP) requirements of 45' maximum. However, this height is at the permitted 100' allowed by Chapter 18.798. Chapter 18.520.50 lists no additional criteria or guidelines for the IP Zone. ACCESS (Chapter 18.705 ) The parcel is currently developed as a sewer plant with a primary access point to SW 85th Avenue. This Chapter was addressed during the approval of the original development. No changes to the previously approved access is proposed. Current requirements are met with at least 1 access point meeting the minimum access width of 30' and the minimum pavement width of 24', as shown upon Site Plan A1.0. SPECIAL SETBACKS (Chapter 18.730) The parcel is currently developed as a sewer plant, and this Chapter was addressed during the approval of the original development. No changes to the previously approved setbacks are proposed. Wireless Communications Facilities are further governed by Chapter 18.798.050. Please see the attached narrative addressing these criteria specific to Wireless Communications Facilities. BUFFERING AND SCREENING (Chapter 18.745) The parcel is currently developed as a sewer plant, and this Chapter was addressed during the approval of the original storage center development. No changes to the previously approved buffering and screening are proposed. Wireless Communications Facilities are further governed by Chapter 18.798.050. Please see the attached narrative addressing these criteria specific to Wireless Communications Facilities and the requested variance. OFF-STREET PARKING /LOADING (Chapter 18.765) The parcel is currently developed as a sewer plant facility with designated parking adjacent to SW 85th Avenue and undesignated parking throughout the development. This Chapter was addressed during the approval of the original development. No changes to the previously approved loading or parking areas are proposed. Chapter 18.765.040 sets no minimum requirement for parking for wireless telecommunications developments. As with all other users of the sewer plant facility, Salmon shall utilize the undesignated parking areas adjacent to its leased premises for the infrequent technician visit to the site. Once construction is completed, an equipment technician would visit the site approximately one time per month for routine maintenance purposes only. PARKING (Chapter 18.765.040) Please see the above narrative addressing Off-street parking /loading (Chapter 18.765). SENSITIVE LANDS (Chapter 18.775) Please see the attached CWS Site Assesment showing no Sensative Lands within the project area. TREE PLAN REQUIREMENTS (Chapter 18.790.030) The parcel is currently developed as a sewer plant, and this Chapter was addressed during the approval of the original development. No changes to the previously approved buffering and screening trees are proposed, and no construction activity shall occur near any trees. MITIGATION (Chapter 18.790.060) The parcel is currently developed as a sewer plant, and this Chapter was addressed during the approval of the original development. No changes to the previously approved buffering and screening trees are proposed, and no construction activity shall occur near any trees. CLEAR VISION AREA (Chapter 18.795) The parcel is currently developed as a sewer plant, and this Chapter was addressed during the approval of the original development. No changes to the previously approved clear vision areas are proposed. Please note the clear vision areas denoted upon the Site Plan A1.2. WIRELESS COMMUNICATIONS FACILITIES (CHAPTER 18.798.050) A. Uses permitted. The Director shall review the uses subject to Site Development Review, as regulated by Chapter 18.360, using approval criteria contained in Section B below. The following uses are subject to approval under this section: 1. Towers in commercial zones and the 1-P zone. A tower, including antennas, other support equipment and/or accessory equipment buildings, in any commercial or 1-P district, provided that such a tower shall be set back from any existing off-site residence by a distance equal to the height of the tower; The proposed new 100' mono-pole meets the above listed requirements to be permitted in the IP zone, subject to a Site Development Review. B. Review criteria. Any use subject to Site Development Review per Section A above, shall be evaluated using the following standards: 1. Aesthetic: a. New towers shall maintain a non-reflective gray finish or, if required by the FAA, be painted pursuant to the FAA's requirements; The new mono-pole shall be non-reflective steel and gray in color. Further weathering of the pole shall enhance the dull gray color and blend the mono-pole with the frequently cloudy skies. b. If collocation on an existing tower is requested, the design of any antenna(s), accessory structures or equipment shall, to the extent possible, use materials, colors and textures that will match the existing tower or non-tower structure to which the equipment of the collocating provider is being attached; This is a new mono-pole development. The proposed antennas and attachment hardware shall be of a similar dull gray non-reflective color as described in the above Section B.1.a c. If collocation on an existing non-tower structure is requested, the antenna(s) and supporting electrical and mechanical equipment shall be a neutral color that is the same as the color as the supporting structure so as to make the antenna(s) and related equipment as visually unobtrusive as possible. This is a new mono-pole development. See the comments for Section B.1.c above. 2. Setbacks: a. Towers designed to collapse within themselves shall be set back in accordance with the setbacks contained in the base zone; The proposed mono-pole is 100' feet in height and set back in excess of 100'from the closest property line, exceeding the base zone (IP) requirements and that of this Chapter. b. Towers not designed to collapse within themselves shall be set back from the property line by a distance equal to the height of the tower. The proposed mono-pole is 100' feet in height and set back in excess of 100'from the closest property line, exceeding the base zone (IP) requirements and that of this Chapter. 3. Tower spacing:No new tower shall be allowed within 500 feet of an existing tower. lf, having completed the collocation protocol outlined in Section 18.798.080 without success, the provider will be required to build a tower less than 500 feet from an existing tower, it will be required to obtain a Type I adjustment governed by 18.370.020 C8b; The nearest tower is north-westerly of the proposed mono-pole, approximately 675 feet as denoted upon Site Plan A1.0, and exceeds this requirement. 4. Tower height:No tower shall exceed 100 feet for a single user or 125 for multiple users; The proposed height of this tower is 100 feet. It is designed to accommodate future collocation. Salmon PCS supports collocation, and has considered multiple carriers in the design of the mono-pole and equipment area. 5. Lighting: No lighting shall be permitted on a tower except as required by the FAA; No lighting is planned. 6. Fencing and security: For security purposes, towers and ancillary facilities shall be enclosed by a minimum six-foot fence; The proposed mono-pole is located upon private property and inside of a secured and fenced sewer plant. Access to the property is controlled on a 24x7 basis. The mono-pole and equipment shall be placed upon a concrete pad, and enclosed by chain link fencing to eliminate the mono-pole from being an attractive nuisance. 7. Landscaping and screening: a. Landscaping shall be placed outside the fence and shall consist of evergreen shrubs which reach six feet in height and 95% opacity within three years of planting; Please see the attached Site Plans showing the landscape plan which meets this criteria and is in accordance with the existing Clean Water Services landscaping plan. b. When adjacent to or within residentially-zoned property, free-standing towers and accessory equipment facilities shall be screened by the planting of a minimum of four evergreen trees at least 15 feet in height at the time of planting. The planting of said trees shall be prescribed in number by a plan prepared by a registered arborist in locations that(1)most effectively screen the wireless facilities from residential uses and(2)promote the future survival of the trees while limiting adverse effects of the trees on abutting properties. Existing evergreen trees at least 15 feet in height may be used to meet the screening requirement of this section if the arborist demonstrates that they provide screening for abutting residential uses; Please see the attached Site Plans showing the landscape plan which meets this criteria and is in accordance with the existing Clean Water Services landscaping plan. 8. Noise:Noise-generating equipment shall be sound-buffered by means of baffling, barriers or other suitable means to reduce the sound level measured at the property line to 50 dBA (day)/40 dBA (night) when adjacent to a noise-sensitive land use and 75 dBA (day)/60 dBA (night) when adjacent to other uses. The proposed development complies with the above listed noise levels. The equipment produces minimal noise and shall be located inside of an fenced compound. The compound in which the telecommunications equipment shall be located is surrounded by other existing building and landscaping,which shall further buffer the minimal noise produced. C. Other requirements.At the time a provider requests a building permit, it must demonstrate compliance to all applicable state and federal regulations, including, but not limited to, the Oregon Uniform Structural and Building Codes and FAA. Salmon shall comply with applicable state and federal regulations, and provide the required evidence upon the request for a building permit. STREET& UTILITY IMPROVEMENT STANDARDS (Chapter 18.810) The parcel is currently developed as a sewer plant. No changes to the previously approved street and improvements are proposed. The exception is the underground electrical and telecommunications utilities to be extended to the proposed development site as governed by 18.818.120 Utilities. This criteria is addressed upon the attached Site Plans. 5-23-02 Community Meeting Sign in Sheet Name Address we er nebec 74.r3sw A-S6tfoRD sr awtz" g ,60 4 irti- iFIDAVIT OF MAIL S/POSTING NEIGHBORHI ) MEETING NOTICE JRTANT NOTICE: THE 'APPLICANT IS REQUIRED TO MAIL THE CITY OF TIGARD A COPY OF THE GHBORHOOD MEETING NOTICE THAT PERTAINS TO THIS AFFIDAVIT AT THE SAME TIME PROPERTY jWNERS ARE MAILED NOTICE, TO THE ADDRESS BELOW: ry, City of Tigard Planning Division �� %^fix �. �. 13125 SW Hall Boulevard Tigard, OR 97223-8189 IN ADDITION, THE APPLICANT SHALL SUBMIT THIS AFFIDAVIT & COPIES OF ALL NOTICES AT THE TIME OF APPLICATION. MAILING: f` f`t i�ckrt being duly sworn, depose and say that on the day of to 20 c ?.,.I caused to have mailed to each of the persons on the attached list, a notice of a meeting to discuss of proposed development at (or near) /GS Esc 5 W. 44,42. , a copy of which notice so mailed is attached hereto and made a part of hereof. I further state that said notices were enclosed in envelopes plainly addressed to said persons and were deposited on the date indicated above in the United States Post Office located at 70AL_.A-1'∎ 1`( 0761one with postage prepaid thereon. Signature In the presence of a Notary Public) POSTING: I, r� !LJ I`O {C {L , do affirm that I am (represent) the party initiating interest in a proposed ftc9 MO -Pa/c• . affe9jing the land located at (state the approximate location(s) IF no address(s)and/ lot(s) currently registered) /(058 t SQL S 2211 /4----4;-- and did on the C -- /day 01 i1447" , 20 Q? personally post notice indicating that the site may be proposed for a application, and the time, date and place of a neighborhood meeting to discuss the proposal. The sign was posted at (state location you posted notice on prope Signature (In the presence of a Notary Public) (THIS SECTION FOR A STATE OF OREGON, NOTARY PUBLIC TO COMPLETE/NOTARIZE) STATE OF of i -\ ) ss. Subscribed and sworn/affirmed before me on the U day of ('' I , 2OOa ,,,,,,,,,, pFFICIAL SEAL_ / MELINDA WENL ) :3.`� NoTAfgY Fusuc-322389 I 6) 1 6 COtnr14SSlON N0. I MY COMM4SSIOT4REtiti. NOTARY PUBLIC OF•OR ON My Commission Expires: Applicant, please complete the information below: (�• NAME OF PROJECT OR PROPOSED DEVELQ M T 4 1W. t , vs C-• (M. ' & Po le TYPE OF PROPOSED DEVELOPMENT: S.L)h- / - .v2- A_ KPw eruAeb J -fE' Address or General Location of Subject Prorty: l Et S —' (5'5 Subject Property Tax Map(s)and Lot#(s): Z— IS' O St,-)1 a S.d - (9(9(,c}e h:Uoginlpatty'masterslaffidavit of mailing-posting neighborhood meeting.doc MERICOMTM C O R P O R A T I O N May 8, 2002 RE: Salmon PCS, LLC mono-pole Dear Interested Party: Mericom Corporation as a consultant for Salmon PCS, LLC (dba Cingular Wireless) representing the owner of the property located at 16580/16060 SW 85th Ave, Tigard, Oregon, Washington County Assessor map/lot #2S 113B0-00600. We are considering proposing a new mono-pole with associated equipment located on the southerly side of the existing Clean Water Services chemical storage building. This location is approximately 1000 feet south of Durham Road. Prior to applying to the City of Tigard for the necessary permits, there will be an opportunity to discuss the proposal in more detail with the surrounding property owners and residents. You are invited to attend a meeting on: May 23rd, 2002 Friends Church of Tigard 15800 SW Hall Blvd, Tigard 6 PM Please note this shall be an informational meeting on preliminary plans. I look forward to discussing the proposal with you. Please contact me with any questions you may have. Sincerely, MERICOM CORPORATION Ed ournier Senior Project Manager 25977 SW CANYON CREEK ROAD, SUITE E, WILSONVILLE, OREGON 97070, U.S.A. TELEPHONE: (503) 303-3000 / FAx: (503) 303-3001 a Applicants Statement— Project Overview f Salmon PCS, LLC (Salmon) proposes a new 100' mono-pole in the Clean Water Services Durham Treatment Plant located at 16580 SW 85th Avenue, Tigard, OR. The applicant is requesting approval of a Type II Site Design Review application, with the applicable SDR fee of$800 enclosed. 2 antennas for each of 3 sectors will be attached onto the mono-pole via 5' davit arms at an elevation of 100'. The proposed installation consists of installing up to 5 small equipment cabinets approximately (30"x30"x60" tall) that will be located inside two of the storage units. As call volume increases at the site additional cabinets may be added. Surplus space in the equipment area and mono-pole not reserved for future expansion by Salmon shall be made reasonably available for future collocation by other carriers. Impact to public facilities and services will be minimal. Access shall be via the existing paved parking lot from SW 85th Avenue. During construction or operation of the site, minimal traffic would be generated as a result of the facility. Once construction is completed, an equipment technician would visit the site approximately one time per month for routine maintenance purposes only. Telephone service and electrical power are the only public facilities required by the proposed site, and are available at the site at this time. Salmon's proposed site is an unmanned facility, and would not require any water, waste treatment or management of hazardous materials. No improvements to public facilities are needed to accommodate this development. The proposed communication facility will not interfere with surrounding properties or their uses, and will not cause interference with any electronic equipment, such as telephones, televisions, or radios. Non-interference is ensured by the Federal Communications Commission (FCC) regulation of radio transmissions. Salmon PCS Technology Similar to cellular technology, Salmon systems use "cells" or geographic coverage areas that resemble a honeycomb pattern to provide service. Typically, one antenna fixture and a base station area located within each cell area. The base station is comprised of equipment cabinets about the size of small refrigerators. The wireless PCS digital technology is emerging as a necessary emergency service and business tool, as well as a convenience for personal and family use. PCS will provide two-way mobile voice communication, two-way paging/short message service, data transmission, voice mail, and conference calling through compact devices. The new digital technology also produces a higher quality transfer of voice and data than the analog/digital hybrid systems currently in use by the cellular carriers. System Information Salmon, a Cingular Wireless affiliate, is currently developing a digital PCS (Personal Communications System) throughout Oregon. Upon completion of this network, Salmon will operate a state of the art digital network of wireless communication sites throughout Oregon, and in connection with other nationwide Cingular market areas. Mericom Corporation (Mericom) is responsible for the development of many of the Salmon sites and provides a broad range of professional services; to include program management, land use planning, site acquisition, construction management, and technical services. Mericom, on behalf of Salmon, has submitted this application. The proposed use would allow Salmon to provide the needed service to the surrounding community and to this heavily traveled portion of Durham Road and Hall Blvd. The need for specific service is determined by market demand, capacity requirements for a specific geographic area, and the need to provide continuous coverage from one site to another in a particular geographic region. Once the need for additional capacity or enhanced coverage in a particular area has been established, Salmon's Radio Frequency (RF) engineers identify a target area ("search ring") to locate a new facility. The required site location and antenna height is determined by an engineering study. This study evaluates radio signal propagation over the desired coverage area based on topography, geographic features and possible signal attenuation due to seasonal changes in vegetation. It is desirable to have direct line of sight from the base station antennas to the required coverage objectives. Based on the topography and the amount of traffic in the servicing area, Salmon's RF engineers determined that the • above listed antenna elevation upon the proposed tower would enable them to meet their coverage objectives. It is crucial for Salmon to have adequate coverage in this area in order to serve customers in compliance with its FCC ► license regulations. Other specifics of the proposed installation are addressed on the enclosed site plan and responses to applicable Code Sections, including 18.798. SITE ACQ.: DATE: 4 ZONING: DATE: .. eat CONST: DATE: �o II i RF: DATE: r F 11...ill INTERCONNECT: DATE: U a aci -- _----- # OF SETS: 0 11x17 0 22x34 +4 11x17 FOR SBA [I —ix r ° it RS E if P1328-01 ,� ja ? a '✓ o N co 0 N 16060 SW 85TH AVE. RECEIVED Oak o E TIGARD, OR 97224 I, a. co a. CITYOF Salmon PCS >� = N LM Li-) oz 0, N c a O — C)O CU z MI Ca Fs-1 Rce 0 Cii 1 ALL WORK AND MATERIALS SHALL BE PERFORMED AND INSTALLED IN SHEET DESCRIPTION REV. THIS PROJECT IS TO INSTALL A LOCAL PERSONAL COMMUNICATIONS SYSTEM (PCS) STE WHICH WILL TRANSMIT AND RECEIVE RADIO SIGNALS AS PART ACCORDANCE WITH THE CURRENT EDITIONS OF THE FOLLOWING CODES AS TITLE SHEET 0 1 1 x 1 7 DRAWINGS ci OF A REGIONAL PCS NETWORK FOR SALMON PCS, LLC ADOPTED O BE CONSTRUED OGPERMTNWORK NOT CONFORMING TONTHESEECO PLANS ES. G1•0 O ARE 50% REDUCTIONS THE MAIN COMPONENTS ARE: G2.0 GENERAL NOTES, LEGEND &ABBREVIATIONS 0 C, 1. OREGON STATE STRUCTURAL SPECIALTY CODE 1998 oD • (6)ANTENNAS MOUNTED ON A NEW 100'-0. MONOPOLE 0 100'-O• C.L. 0%1) ARr 2. ANSI/EIA-222-F LIFE SAFETY CODE NFPA-101-1990 `CD� � 1-N •'- (2) EQUIPMENT CABINETS & (3) FUTURE, ARE PLACED INSIDE AN NEW •...,, f/Y.N.PLOYNI C1 y LEASE AREA, SOUTH OF AN EXISTING BUILDING 3. NATIONAL ELECTRIC CODE 1996 Cl.0 SITE SURVEY 0 r� n d -<1 Tr --3 m EXIT . 29i PROJECT DESCRIPTION CODE COMPLIANCE ``-'O'T`"'O °9`°"_ _ ,r p o N v < - ; J A1.0 VICINITY/ EXISTING CONDITIONS/ SITE DEVELOPMENT PLAN 0 9�C Or 0� CD V 3 1.t. APPLICANT/ LESSEE: I ARCHITECT: PRIMARY A1.1 ENLARGED SITE PUN&EQUIP. ELEVATIONS 0 GAZLEY CI PLOWMAN SALMON PCS, LLC GAZLEY PLOWMAN ARCHITECTS CONTACT: A1.2 VISUAL CLEARANCE SITE PLAN 0 SW DURHAM ROAD g 2701 ARCHITECT 123 NE 3RD AVENUE. SUITE 240 2701 NW VAUGHN, SUITE 764 2'01 NW Vaughn PORTLAND, OR 97232 PORTLAND. OR 97219 MERICOM Sour 76i 8 CO PHONE: (503) 706-4253 CONTACT: DEAN HOOUE 25977 SW CANYON CREEK RD. STE. E A2.0 ELEVATIONS 0 Saar 764 O.97210 SITE PHONE: (503)) 274-7800 a 237 CONTACT:MLLE. OR 97070 303 274 7803 Cp . .p'• FAX: (503) 274-7803 CONTACT: ED FOURNI ER A2.1 ELEVATIONS 0 3032717803 Fax = �Q' FAX PHONE: (503) 303- 3GC1 DATE: 5/29/02 9 - PROPERTY INFORMATION: SURVEYOR: ZONING: REVISIONS N . OWNER: CLEAN WATER SERVICES CSA CONSULTING ENGINEERS MERICOM REV.: DATE: DESCRIPTION: E Cr) &' 321 SW 4TH, FOURTH FLR. 25977 SW CANYON CREEK RD. STE. E ADDRESS: 16060 SW 85TH AVE. PORTLAND, OR 97204 WILSONVILLE. OR 97070 TIGARD, OR 97224 CONTACT: STEVE CLIFFORD CONTACT: ED FOURNIER a. CO PHONE: (503) 228-3848 PHONE: (503) 303-3000 L1.0 LANDSCAPE PLAN. NOTES, & DETAILS 0 1 CONTACT: ROB BAUR FAX: (503) 228-0475 FAX: (503) 303-3001 N PHONE: (503) 684-4617 ch L2.0 LANDSCAPE DETAILS 0 AREA OF CONSTRUCTION: APPROXIMATELY 200 SO. FT. OCURRENT ZONING: I-P (PUBLIC INSTITUTION) EC1 EROSION CONTROL PLAN 0 ISSUED FOR CD ZONING APPUCATION I: Q 5/29/02 ZONING REVIEW L 1. VICINITY MAP TM APN: 2S-1W-13B-00600 o SITE No. CO A.D.A. REQUIREMENTS: FACILITY IS UNMANNED AND NOT FOR PT328-01 HUMAN HABITATION. HANDICAPPED a I ACCESS NOT REQUIRED. it- TAKE 1-5 SOUTH TO EXIT 291. AT THE RAMP, TAKE A RIGHT ON TO UPPER BOONES FERRY CONSTRUCTION w RD. AND HEAD WEST. PROCEED TO SW DURHAM RD. AND TURN RIGHT. PROCEED WEST TO TIGA SW 85TH AVE SW 85TH AVE AND TURN LEFT AT THE STOP LIGHT. THE PLANT ACCESS ROAD IS ON THE MANAGER: TIGARD,OR (�) LEFT. ON THE ACCESS ROAD, ENTER THE GATED FACILITY AND THE PROPOSED LOCATION IS MERICON 97224 IMMEDIATELY SOUTH OF THE CONC. BRICK BUILDING W/ANTENNAS ON THE ROOF. 25977 SW CANYON CREEK RD., STE E )•-• WILSONVILLE, OR 97070 a TO OBTAIN ACCESS. CALL ROB OR JOE AT 503-648-8621 IN ADVANCE. CONTACT: MATT CLARK TITLE SHEET PHONE: (503) 303-3000 -. - — FAX: (503) 303-3001 - _- D DRIVING DIRECTIONS PROJECT SUMMARY PROJECT TEAM SHEET INDEX Z G 1 .0 U Ni oz-oaI E==s j 1 isa< GENERAL NOTES ABBREVIATIONS I LEGEND �D ET<uu =1,`;1 Lti LTy 1. CONTRACTOR SHALL VERIFY ALL DIMENSIONS ANO CONDITIONS ON SITE. SYMBOLS C+ S SYMBOLS Eli- -- 2. CONTRACTOR IS NOT TO OBTAIN DIMENSIONS THROUGH MEASUREMENT OF THESE SCALED DRAWINGS. USE < ANGLE CA GAUGE 580 SUPPLIED BY OWNER - ONLY THE DIMENSIONS INDICATED ON THESE DRAWINGS. SHOULD ADDITIONAL DIMENSIONS BE REQUIRED, 0 AT GALV GALVANIZED SC SOLID CORE DETAIL No r,Q CONTACT THE ARCHITECT FOR CLARIFICATION. • DIAMETER or ROUND GB GYPSUM BOARD SCHED SCHEDULE ROOM NAME R -•! 0 1 PERPENDICULAR CBX GYPSUM_ BOARD SECT SECTION DETAIL OOM NAME a m a) POUND or NUMBER TYPE %" SHG SHEATHING REFERENCE (0000( ROOM NUMBER • }. BEFORE ORDERING ANY MATERIAL OR DOING ANY WORK, THE CONTRACTOR SHALL VERIFY IN THE FIELD ALL N ( ) ❑ - DIMENSIONS AND ELEVATIONS WHICH ARE REQUIRED FOR CONNECTIONS TO, OR INSTALLATION IN EXISTING / PER or OVER GFI GROUND FAULT CIRCUIT SHT SHEET SHEET No. ` STRUCTURES. AND FOR MODIFICATIONS INSIDE EXISTING STRUCTURE, AND SHALL BE RESPONSIBLE FOR THE Q. CENTER LINE INTERRUPTER SIM SIMILAR �A•F 0� HEIGHT d .11 e CORRECTNESS OF THE SAME. K PLATE GL0 GLUE LAMINATED BEAM SPEC SPECIFICATIONS O _ BUILDING MARKERJ� $_ < GRND GROUND SO SQUARE SECTION 5' C a. ALL WORK PERFORMED AND MATERIALS INSTALLED SHALL BE IN STRICT ACCORDANCE WITH ALL APPLICABLE A CPS GLOBAL POSITIONING SS STAINLESS STEEL ® [000.0'I FINISH 5`oai; (T) CODES, REGULATIONS, ANO ORDINANCES. CONTRACTOR SHALL GIVE ALL NOTICES AND COMPLY WITH ALL SYSTEM STO STANDARD \ SPOT GRADE ❑ 1,,is,s, C LAWS, ORDINANCES, RULES, REGULATIONS AND LAWFUL ORDERS OF ANY PUBLIC AUTHORITY BEARING ON THE AB ANCHOR BOLT GRD GRADE STL STEEL i H- C AC AIR CONDITIONING GYP GYPSUM STRUCT STRUCTURAL /�\ 000.D EXISTING L) _;. _ 3 PERFORMANCE OF THE WORK. - WALL SECTION \ SPOT GRADE ^;�� ACCA ANTENNA CABLE SUSP SUSPENDED A0.0 O 5. THE CONTRACTOR SHALL BE SOLELY RESPONSIBLE FOR ALL CONSTRUCTION MEANS, METHODS. TECHNIQUES, COVER ASSEMBLY H / I Q- SEQUENCES AND PROCEDURES AND FOR COORDINATING ALL PORTIONS OF THE WORK UNDER THE CONTRACT. ACOUS ACOUSTICAL T ACT ACOUSTICAL TILE HB HOSE BIB <000> >, AD AREA DRAIN HC HOLLOW CORE T TOP O EXTERIOR NUMBER a) 6. PROVIDE ADEQUATE CLEARANCES BETWEEN ARCHITECTURAL. STRUCTURAL, MECHANICAL AND ELECTRICAL ADJ ADJUSTABLE HDR HEADER TEMP TEMPORARY .r7 ELEVATION 0 WINDOW N SYSTEMS. VERIFY PHYSICAL DIMENSIONS OF EQUIPMENT WITH AVAILABLE SPACE AND ACCESS ROUTES A.F.F. ABOVE FINISH FLOOR HDWD HARDWOOD T & G TONGUE AND GROOVE @ THROUGH CONCEALED SPACES. A.F.G. ABOVE FINISH GRADE HDWR HARDWARE THK THICK T r TYPE 7. DETAILS ARE INTENDED TO SHOW END RESULT OF DESIGN. MINOR MODIFICATIONS MAY BE REQUIRED TO AGGR AGGREGATE HGT HEIGHT THRESH THRESHOLD A.G.L. ABOVE GROUND LEVEL HM HOLLOW METAL T.O.A. TOP OF ANTENNA SUIT JOB DIMENSIONS OR CONDITIONS, AND SUCH MODIFICATIONS SHALL BE INCLUDED AS PART OF THE 0 - GRID LINE O KEY N ALUM ALUMINUM HORIZ HORIZONTAL T.O.C. TOP OF CONCRETE NOTE WORK. ANT ANTENNA HR HOUR T.O.F. TOP OF FOUNDATION APROX APPROXIMATE T.O.P. TOP OF PLATE O WALL 8. THE CONTRACTOR SHALL MAKE NECESSARY PROVISIONS TO PROTECT EXISTING IMPROVEMENTS AND ADJACENT ARCH ARCHITECTURAL I (PARAPET) TYPE C CONSTRUCTION AND UPON COMPLETION OF WORK, REPAIR ANY DAMAGE THAT OCCURRED DURING ASPH ASPHALT T.O.S. TOP OF STEEL LINE OS CONSTRUCTION TO THE SATISFACTION OF THE PROJECT MANAGER. AWG AMERICAN WIRE IBC INSTALLED BY T.O.W. TOP OF WALL E GAUGE CONTRACTOR TYP TYPICAL 0j EQUIPMENT T 9. PROVIDE A PORTABLE FIRE EXTINGUISHER WITH A RATING OF NOT LESS THAN 2-A OR 2-A1OBC WITHIN 75 LBO INSTALLED BY OWNER TYPE FEET TRAVEL DISTANCE TO ALL PORTIONS OF THE PROJECT AREA DURING CONSTRUCTION. B ICGB ISOLATED COPPER U '----— WORK POINT / GROUND BUS A REVISION W+ BD BOARD ID INSIDE DIAMETER UG UNDER GROUND BITUM BITUMINOUS IN. (') INCH(ES) UL UNDERWRITERS < BLDG BUILDING INSUL INSULATION LABORATORY 4.131> INTERIOR ° BLK BLOCK ANT INTERIOR LINO UNLESS OTHERWISE ELEVATION N BMKG BEAM CKING J NOTED © w I- 1`--: B.O.C. BOTTOM OF CURB V ROT BOTTOM JT JOINT tL a. CO BTS BASE TRANSCENER VAR VARIES ry p SYSTEM K VEN VENEER Z P"- N BTWC BARE TINNED VERT VERTICAL EQUIPMENT > COPPER WIRE KPL KICK PLATE V.I.F. VERIFY IN FIELD Q O C.O B/U BACK UP CABINET Q NEW ANTENNA 0 p N L W cc z C FIRE HYDRANT w 5 C7 10. (#) POUND(S) W/ WITH Z H M CAB CABINET LB LAG BOLT WD WOOD /A N O LO CEM CEMENT L.F. LINEAR FEET W/O WITHOUT a LIGHT STANDARD r/ /.-0 0 CF COLUMN FACE L LONG(ITUDINAL) WP WATERPROOF 0. di CIP CAST IN PLACE LT LIGHT WT WEIGHT UTILITY POLE CJ CLG CEILING CONTROL JOINT M RAM WOVEN WIRE MESH CLR CLEAR - E POLE GUY WIRE 11x17 DRAWINGS O CMU CONCRETE MASONRY MACH MACHINE N UNIT MAT MATERIAL ARE 50% REDUCTIONS COL COLUMN MAX MAXIMUM (5 CONC CONCRETE MECH MECHANICAL 00 CONN CONNECTION MFG MANUFACTURER MATERIALS BRED ARa� N CONST CONSTRUCTION MEMB MEMBRANE E,-) CONT CONTINUOUS MH MANHOLE CSH CONCRETE SURFACE MIN MINIMUM L - .I CONCRETE F--- ^Y- -1 EARTH wSIEVEN a N PLOMMAN D_ HARDENER MISC MISCELLANEOUS --) CTR CENTER MO MASONRY OPENING CC 0) CTSK COUNTER SINK MTD MOUNTED •-•-• �- I CMU ♦=' -Y=-^:- J GRAVEL • PORTLAND,OREGON MTL METAL 0-3 •0 D MUL MULLION Vt-////Li/:!/i'!-I BRICK (-: - - I SAND 9,, CCSO O B PENNY (NAILS) N - OF QR DBL DOUBLE I I GYPSUM WALLBOARD PLYWOOD U) DEPT DEPARTMENT NIC NOT IN CONTRACT V CD OF DOUGLAS FIR No. (�L) NUMBER I•,";•. ! ,,I"J BATT INSULATION (--�,� —:v FINISH WOOD GAZLEY DIA DIAMETER NOM NOMINAL Q DIM DIMENSION NTS NOT TO SCALE F� C PLOWMAN DR DOOR P----------------1 RIGID INSULATION ✓ � WOOD (CONT.) V ARCHITECT OTL DETAIL 0 2701 NV/Vaughn OJ DWL DOWEL ® STEEL r`\I WOOD BLOCKING 2701761 OC ON CENTER Portland O.97210 N E 00 OUTSIDE DIAMETER ALUMINUM I- - ' - - • . • .i EXISTING STRUCTURE 50503 J 274 7807 Fax P. OPNG OPENING ,- EA EACH OPP OPPOSITE DATE: 5/29/02 O ES EACH SIDE OS OUTSIDE cs EJ" EACH PANSION JOINT P REVISIONS (N EL ELEVATION LINE TYPES REV.: DATE: DESCRIPTION. E CO ELEV ELEVATOR PCS PERSONAL I"' ELEC ELECTRICAL COMMUNICATIONS NEW WORK -SS—SS- SANITARY SEWER ENG ENGINEER SERVICE OM_— D_ ED EQUAL PPC POWER PROTECTION DEMOLITION WORK -SO SD- STORM SEWER (N EQUIP EQUIPMENT CABINET EX EXISTING PR PAIR - CENTERLINE -Po P9- FLOOR DRAIN (N CO EXT EXTERIOR PRC PRIMARY RADIO CABINET - - PROPERTY / LEASE LINE -NO RD- ROOF DRAIN ME I-- P.S.F. POUNDS PER SQUARE F FOOT BREAK LINE i=a. P.S.I. POUNDS PER SQUARE - CC--.-- EXISTING CONTOUR -SOS —GAS - GAS FAB FABRICATION INCH NEW CONTOUR w—W— WATER OO FACT FACTORY PT PRESSURE TREATED ® e 5/29/0211SSUED FOR L FE) FLAT BAR PWD PLYWOOD •`' �' V -,w rw- HOT WATER I FD FLOOR DRAIN PWR POWER (CABINET) SITE No • FDN FOUNDATION PWS PIGMENTED WOOD STAIN .S-- -- EXISTING CHAIN LINK FENCE --Cr—Ca- COLD WATER FE FIRE EXTINGUISHER FEC FIRE EXTINGUSHER Q -_ - = -=-- PT328-01 IL CABINET ` - EXISTING WOOD FENCE FF FINISH FLOOR OT QUARRY TILE —X—X— CHAIN LINK FENCE —A-A- ANTENNA COAX CABLE FG FINISH GRADE QTY QUANTITY —C—C— GROUND V) FIN FINISH Q) FLR FLOOR R —P-P- POWER -CEO—GEN- GENERATOR 16060 SW 85TH AVE FLOUR FLUORESCENT —T T- TELCO -E—E— ELECTRICAL CONDUIT TIGARD,OR U7 F.O.C. FACE OF CONCRETE RAD RADIUS 97224 I F.O.F. FACE OF FINISH RD ROOF DRAIN -PAT—PAT- POWER & TELCO —C—C— CONDUIT I— F.O.M. FACE OF MASONRY REINF REINFORCED D- F.O.S. FACE OF STUD REO REQUIRED ii- F.O.W. FACE OF WALL RO ROUGH OPENING GENERAL NOTES FP FIRE PROOF -- --0-P- - OVERHEAD POWER LEGEND& Q FT FOOT or FEET - --o,:- - OVERHEAD TELCO ABBREVIATIONS --1 FTG FOOTING D FURR FURRING - -0-- - OVERHEAD Ca Z — G2 • U N JOB No 02-081 (N j DURHAM ROAD - EX.BUILDING :` o 2. / O � �� Ij `� - % /' v f U z , 06 • ��' iH" � I _! a ►FYI 1 / \... �S �, w 1 3 � K 41 0•< 1! I • '11 + W N C I;' J a 1 Q > vY Kh 3 -'t, . Ya:;4om:. • I• e' ' I a 1 pkv ,-.Arst,. \f-.0 . c.:: =. p . 0:0 0 �� + i 0 a ' iteetyA: g‘ 00 ri C L.—'. _ v �-I� i,�PR/MAR : HE 11.11 A.B. POLE nQ - / f - - �' /`+�.v.�:.� I Nei" a :LOG NO. 4 SEC. BLOC. O' — I �J/ I O O.a -�a ` JI CLARIFIER' RAS O 0000""'' I < r. © , E/ NO. 4 3 N • -DAD- :ra' - �)); PUMPING a _ l l R `r:: )„,,, ,•• W/7� STATION •K' \l \ u ^ C wn•° M 1•+ A.B. SEC. _ •\ \ EX. I` ui• O HEAD.°•e �I ' ( AR� -UCT`` NO. 3 CLARIFIER• • \ \ ORIYEWAY \ A g vi Z' °r`NORK• LAI�I£: 1, • NO. 3 f K. •2 O / O OQ O BL t ,'O' N6 J .. SURGE NO.BASIN SURGE BASIN 1, \\., • • (m Q o 2 Mr I� O r'RI{M�ACR Y • /I VJ m 2:a C. D EFFLUENT. /, (//R �- • C`C F •Ov6 SPLI l`•. E%.CONC. Z NI b /-RIMAR SEC, ��,111�� CBL9G. L4RIFIE• y'' P . . 'il .' ' NO. I I"!N0.1F2�� /. / TRENCH CN �1 1 '� �� ' _``�/x• FILTER �4 O o e j-.C -3- IA ° �; \��`', SEC. II �' �4 BABASIN 'b. V LEASE AREA °c a. _.-i FA , 0-.C - �� CLARIFIER �a� 40'*. BASIN NO 1 I� / Kn Ili X •C • OUSTER L 2 ` �i BL9 G iuO_' • \\v4 I�O /'� `\ AREAGRASS = Z O j ;I0e ` w O 3 il! ��P B� l•0 • �,`ADR,„. 5 , C EXCESS FLOW E p'`■ �� ..MPL � f/ \ DIVERSION ` Z Cr ;: ►1ta:,•� 4j " \ STRUCTURE CO a • 1 C ---- -- �i ,� -fir—. '� •� e ~ \../ ...1 Er - ' p I� LECI 1V a E%.POWER!Aunt rl //�///]' RCE 1�%�/L' �_--� / t FROM C �■ Y" �J \ SUBSTAPON/c I;1�� J ,;- �..� EX ` � Consulting Engineers•�, '' 1 r �DRivEwAr err 321 SW 4th AVE., 4TH FLOOR•o RAN / �� PORTLAND, OREGON 97204 i , PU PING 503-228-38481 ema 1: 503-228-0475 i e.corn Ax)17. 557"" 8 ICI ?7,4"er---/ /J \-/ ❑ \`� ..A cam' , ) o, b -n–_ a .\ \) • � �. • i SITE PLAN ENLARGED SITE PLAN cc' 0 SCALE:V'=200' o SCALE:r=16' F- a PROPERTY DESCRIPTION PROJECT INFORMATION: SURVEYOR'S STATEMENT: SURVEY NOTES VICINITY MAP LEGEND r. . C __-- PROJECT DATE: 05/21/02 BEGINNING AT THE NORTHWEST CORNER OF SECTION 13,TOWNSHIP 2 SOUTH,RANGE SITE NAME: OWNER'S NAME: I,STEVEN R.CLIFFORD.A REGISTERED LAND SURVEYOR IRIDES THE STATE LAWS OF 1. THIS 15 NOT A BOUNDARY SURVEY; IT IS INSTEAD A PROPERTY LINE 1 NEST.OF THE WILLAMETTE MERIDIAN.AND RUNNING EAST ALONG THE NORTH LINE OREGON.DO HEREBY STATE THAT THE INFORMATION,MEASUREMENTS. COMMENTS. SPECIALIZED TOPOGRAPHICAL/INFORMATIONAL MAP WIT1H THE S<' a OF SAO SECTION 13 TO THE NORn1WE57 CORNER OF THAT CERTAIN TRACT RECORD BOUNDARY LINES,BEARINGS AND DISTANCES AS SHORN HEREON ARE BASED PROPERTY ONES,EASEMENTS,AND BUILDINGS SHOWN BEING A < - 1 1 X 1 7 DRAWINGS CONVEYED TO DONALD LESLIE MOORE•ET UO,BY DEED RECORDED JUNE 18.1948 IN DURHAM CLEAN WATER SERVICES PLANT UPON A FIELD SURVEY AND UPON ITEMS OF PUBUC RECORD.FURTHERMORE,THE C GRAPHIC REPRESENTATION OF VARIOUS DATA COMPILED FROM n. E , i' , —--— PROPERTY LINE ARE 50% REDUCTIONS BOO(286,PAGE 351; THENCE SOUTH ALONG 1HE WEST LINE OF SAID MOORS TRACT LATITUDE AND LONGITUDE ARE ACCURATE TO WITHIN 220'HORIZONTALLY AND THAT A NUMBER OF SOURCES INCLUDING,BUT NOT UNITED TO. C 440 FEET TO THE SOUTHWEST CORNER OF SAID TRACT; THENCE EAST ALONG THE SITE ADDRESS: OWNER'S ADDRESS: THE SITE ELEVATION IS ACCURATE TO'MTHIN±3'VERTICALLY.THE HORIZONTAL DATUM PRELIMINARY TITLE REPORTS.BACK-UP DOCUMENTS OF H N , SOUTH LINE OF SAID TRACT 142 FEET; THENCE CONTINUING EAST ALONG THE SOUTH (COORDINATES)ARE IN TERMS OF THE NORTH AMERICAN DATUM OF 1983(NAD 83) RECORD.TAX LOT MAPS.AS WELL AS INFORMATION GATHERED SITE NO. LINE OF THAT CERTAIN TRACT CONVERGED TO HAROLD L.EDWARDS,ET UX.BY DEED t"' AND ARE EXPRESSED AS DEGREES.MINUTES AND SECONDS(TO THE NEAREST TENTH AND MONUMENTS FOUND DURING THE FIELD SURVEY.THE ------ EASEMENT PT 328-01 C RECORDED SEPTEMBER 20, 1949 IN BOOK 299,PAGE 158,TO THE NORTHWEST 16060 SW 85TH 16060 SW 85111 OF A SECOND).THE VERTICAL DATUM H CORNER OF THAT CERTAIN TRACT CONVEYED TO DURHAM SCHOOL DISTRICT NO.82, TGARD,OR 97224 TIGARD,OR 97220 (HEIGHTS)ARE IN TERMS OF NAVp 88 AND SCOPE R WORK FOR THIS SURVEY THERE NOT INCLUDE SW OURHAM RD BY DEED RECORDED JULY 10. 1951 IN BOOK 322.PAGE 470; THENCE SOUTH ALONG DETERMINED TO THE NEAREST FOOT. BOUNDARY RESOLUTION.NOR IS THERE IDY AS TO HE ACTUAL r 1 THE WEST LINE OF SAID SCHOOL DISTRICT TRACT 434.5 FEET.MORE OR LESS,TO OR RESPONSIBILITY BOUNDARY OR IMPLIED AS TO THE ACTUAL O d ^ THE SOUTH UNE OF THAT CERTAIN TRACT CONVEYED TO FRED R.HARRISON.ET Ux, COUNTY: LOCATION OF SAID BOUNDARY LINES. '1.4 —-— CENTERLINE 16060 SW 85TH 121111 TIGARD,OR a Br DEED RECORDED IN BOOK 218,PACE 336; THENCE EAST TO TOE EAST UNE OF 2. UNLESS OT/HERYIISE NOTED,NO UNDERGROUND Unu TY H"lA kN' � V DECLINATION FROM MAGNETIC NORTH: / 97224 THE WEST ONE-HALF OF THE NORTHWEST ONE-QUARTER OF SAID SECTION 13; WASHINGTON LOCATING SERVICES COMPANY WAS CONTACTED PRIOR TO THE 0. THENCE EASTERLY ALONG THE NORTH LINE OF THE SOUTHEAST ONE-QUARTER OF PREPARATION OF THIS MAP. THEREFORE.THERE MAY EXIST SITE 1'C` Aar— ,.7 liii FENCELINE THE NORTHWEST ONE-QUARTER OF SAID SECTION 13 A DISTANCE O 282.2 FEET, USGS.1984.BEAVERTON,DREG.: 20' NON-VISIBLE OR OBSCURE UTILITIES ON SITE BUT NOT MORE OR LESS.TO THE NORTHERLY RIGHT-OF-WAY LINE OF THE OREGON ELECTRIC ZONING: AREA OF PARCEL: INDICATED ON THIS MAP. RAILWAY CO.; THENCE SOUTHWESTERLY ALONG SAID NORTHERLY LINE TO THE SOUTH l'p LINE THE ADAM SHAVER CLAIM; THENCE WEST ALONG SAID SOUTH CLAIM LINE TO dD —XX— 5'CONTOUR �^ THE ONE-OUARTER SECTION POST BETWEEN SECTIONS 13 AND 14; THENCE NORTH GENERAL COMMERCIAL XXXX CALL BEFORE YOU DIG! t� DURHAM GEOGRAPHIC COORDINATES: Q 2843.92 FEET,MORE OR LESS. TO THE POINT OF BEGINNING. REGISTERED 3 ONLY THE FINAL STAMPED,SIGNED AND DATED-HARD COPY- W [ SITE SURVEY ASSESSOR'S PARCEL#: PROJECT AREA: PROFESSIONAL O THIS DOCUMENT IS THE LEGALLY RECOGNIZED PRODUCT O Tuactin Irt —XX— 1'CONTOUR Ec EXCEPTING THEREFROM THOSE PORTIONS LYING VATHiN THE BOUNOARIES Or SW LATITUDE: XX%x NAD 10 LAND SURVEYOR Q DURHAM ROAD ANO SW 8514 AVENUE. LONGITUDE: %XXX NAD BS CSA CONSULTING ENGINEERS.ANY ADDITIONAL ELECTRONIC Country CAA, 2S_1w-13El-00600 xxxx MEGA PROVIDED TO OUR CLIENTS IS TO BE CONSIDERED d1 = ' SOLELY AS A COURTESY AND IS NOT TO BE REPROOUCED. LATITUDE: xXXX NAD 27 BUILDING LONGITUDE. %%N% NAD 27 DISTRIBUTED.SOLD.OR IN ANY WAY ALTERED WITHOUT SA ,• OREGON EXPRESS WRITTEN CONSENT OF A REPRESENTATIVE OF CSA MN ^\ L MAWS,3, IF CONSULTING ENGINEERS. N 20' / • 1 �I GROUND ELEVATION: xxxx NAND 88 STEVEN R. CLIFFORD ZONING `V MN VIM 2 2172 ��!IA BOUNDARY � ' E EXPIRES: I2-..TI-03 I •`� FOUND MONUMENT S AS NOTED JOB No. 328-01 ADJ. ZONING • ZONE (R12) MEDIUM DENSITY RESIDENTIAL 1 i5a JURISDICTION: CITY OF TIGARD Z USE: RESIDENTIAL 3'S • �r---------------- DURFWMROAD - _-42 W -__-_ .7 .—. _ III --__-• \ U Q a: ADJ. ZONING ` I, ,At. ,.- 1• j rl I —o '-,'r. ,j I j ADJ. ZONING ,is .0 ZONE: (R4.5) RESIDENTIAL TELCO ROUTE FROM 3.4., 77R _ ` JURISDICTION: CITY OF TIGARD EXISTING TELCO BOX _� "/:' `'* ,...,tent cot! I I - ZONE: (LI) LIGHT INDUSTRIAL I'IO. R < USE: TIGARD HIGH SCHOOL INSIDE CHEM. BUILDING I �) 'i `\ O �•�/('° , r 1 JURISDICTION: CITY OF TIGARD �, C TO SITE. 3270' /' •-yH �J I j I I j USE: BUSINESS PARK a c1Z•.4 f y^ (C SITE - I _ ! 3. 0 R E ENTRY i �I �: l ` -"-M Q . - r— - - - - - - �� - o , oo0u 0 o0 !' T, ADJ. ZONING a ADJ. ZONING ( �. a a ' �I {� o ZONE: (R12) MEDIUM DENSITY RESIDENTIAL d ZONE: (LI) LIGHT INDUSTRIAL I - o ••V.-.-.-0-0� -, JURISDICTION: CITY OF TIGARD M JURISDICTION: CITY OF TIGARD - J1 - • 1°la RO - - USE: DURHAM SCHOOL b • PROPOSED 0 co USE: BUSINESS PARK A I( I I- 0 SALMON PCS o c_ 11 - - •^ -ill I' _A,f ® EQUIPMENT WITHIN G N e a^r'=J -- e: '1 . -WS PROPERTY. 0. ADJ. ZONING }._.._. /�= I (, — /•it, I1_ I / r co ZONE: (LI) LIGHT INDUSTRIAL ---•��. 1.. r .E JURISDICTION: CITY OF TIGARD ': ■ I T C. USE: CLEAN WATER SERVICES �� •I- `',f`� �� }i \, ,�\. ZONING r-3— ZONE: (I-P) PUBLIC INSTITUTION 1 00 j• ei17.."." 41111, I I JURISDICTION: CITY OF TIGARD Alio * ., • ,.0, ° O , T}1! 1 , USE: CLEAN WATER SERVICES N N ADJ. ZONING `�s;s. �' ° °;` i ' �jt F aaRExlsnlle� F iki Q\: I / -^�� • SUBSTATION 1' I / p lL') ZONE: LI LIGHT INDUSTRIAL I �(, BASEMENT TO. 7. N JURISDICTION: CITY OF TIGARD 0 .-17S7 CS / ' *TOO• I in • ( i . ;;, ■ , . .. , i . . ,K----"s Cli) El 2CC I ci a . O ° o I t 4�,� •• ' \ f 1/f� ARE 150% REDUCTIONS di , �Y-; �•o` /:'1 ��.` '. c /1. \-. Q ___ ': I `fi ��F�ED ARC' co _ d (r1 / r l r'-1�\` ,T 2-•".'T jib 0 I� .'�• 0 . r •'/ ..•��---�" ADJ. ZONING VSrBV&,Y•PLUM/AN� aADJ. ZONING ';��I ,o --} /G r A ZONE: (OS) OPEN SPACE ! ' C ( ) 8 I a•- •. 2- JURISDICTION:K N: CITY OF TICARD '11', ��PORILAM.coma O2 c ZONE: I-P PUBLIC INSTITUTION I //,/,//� OF C USE'S CLEAN WATER SERVICES / IA_ � Lc 1�(L/•" r%^\ i/� 9��OP ��V• • rn Y %%i j /( -S�N� GAZLEY l 'i I o ' r..! • / PLOWMAN 0 i S' y !' ^� ARCNITEC'• r �� O z701 Nw Vaughn CO a �lY(l. /y/ / Pont 4 80 9n10 C7 I d /U/! `/ 303 27f 7E00 N ! -( `� 503 271 7803 Fax �; Q 'J /!f `\ DATE: 5/29/O2 • ° i —��'—' co o -- ��J))))/, �)/j REVISIONS co I /', l ('N •/ REV.: DATE: DESCRIPTION: M I . /• ``\ \�,` i� / ' \ a. Mt1j'a i \ . O r - ` Q 5 2 ,, ISSUED FOR f ;� //t•t ! 0 4 "2 70NIN(: RFVIFW dT ,, M �; m _ PT328-01 IL P . ! .- J N ._ ( 16060 SW 85TH AVE yi TIGARD,OR 97224 III 8/ _ VICINITY/ I— ; I•N' I N z0N' EXISTING CONDITIONS/ 'Q, • ;I41 ,- SITE DEVELOPMENT j fl PLAN I U y; I �. '. Al .0 N VICINITY/ EXISTING CONDITIONS/ SITE DEVELOPMENT PLAN SCALE A 1 No 02-081 15'-0" 1. VERIFY LOCATION OF EXISTING UTILITIES / 1 i•-0• 11'-8" r _ill• . BEFORE YOU DIG. • I{ 2. RELOCATE LAWN AREA SPRINKLERS ALONG ■ EAST FENCE UNE & TIE IRRIGATION TO EXISTING R AS NECESSARY. �I-' 3. MOW STRIP WALL BE PLACED ALONG THE EAST ,--m+ • BOUNDARY LINE TO SEPARATE THE LAWN AND I SERVX:Et •I '1 SHRUB BED. / (I ) I 0I- ? '�" H I $$EERVICE2 V BASE EXTENSION 1 EXTENSION Ark 1 (MURE) (INITIAL) (FUTURE) 1 (FUTURE) I Q .N. / I 1 IN ' F +. .� _ t // / f 1 I 1 II Ark �� Sa PROPOSED 4' WIDE / 1 II \ II\ II ® d // SIDEWALK TO SITE `` \ I! \ 1111 \ I I W R gg / b 2 1,t. 3 EXISTING ASPHALT .• ( '� i F.a 4 4 0 N DRIVEWAY PROPOSED 4' WIDE ALUMINUM • •• 'c. TELCO AND POWER STUB-UP FROM UTILITY BACKBOARD f GRADING OVER CONC. DITCH TO / • I&\'// I POWER AND TELCO SERVICE DIAGRAMS VERIFY rcSTUB-UPH • SITE W/ HANDRAILS. REMOVE / . ^• >, EXIST. HANDRAIL AS NECESSARY. 1 / A■I'■■■'� LOGTION WITH CONSTRUCTION MANAGER. EWE; \ "iev✓P" - \\\ �r I CABINET MANUFACTURERS % ,\trr z.ia•\� 'i / I Q WRITTEN INSTRUCTIONS aiRstaco`■L / N \c■a s ,.\ - I NQZE. I- / ��Ilk �� r q• CONDUIT TO CABINETS TO BE INSTALLED / 1 PER MANUFACTURERS WRITTEN • C / /,a - • - — - INSTRUCTIONS. SEE ALSO ELECTRICAL E ' � a.e ''• I/ EXISTING CONCRETE ��/ •yC // /I DITCH W/ HANDRAIL . _ � ■ 0 C o I EQUIPMENT LAYOUT irr=r4. 2 �' W o / �'.,= .,,.; I to N M y�� / — s�`-,pROROSED'.4. I W N LSO ti�SS / .W10E M.ANGATf •..-t I 1 1'-8" O 2 q O _ '/ -•.... '.,:'/>..'::YI / 2'-4' • 2-4" 2'-<. 2'-4' 2'-4' • Q O 0 ..-4/ I = / /'/' i/ <•fF.- I �WORK LIGHT 2 / F/' I, / y PROPOSED SALMON POI I '—' F I 9 h /\ ` ,, �> u11Lr1Y PEDESTAL & // I r.---- r----11r----1 .a �i / _ jam', VERIZON TELCO BOAR / r----I I r---TI r---TI / a� 'T ' / I 11 I I I I 0 GENERATOR 1 1x1 7 DRAWINGS ,/ / —" _ I/ I i I 11 I I I I RECEPTACLE ARE 50% REDUCTION .... ..�/ ♦ \ / _ I ~ 1 / / , • L--_J 1 A e a •L__-J.I L---J PLINTH `'SAC CABINET �gED ARc •N \\ /� / I // _� I - SERVICE2 •I SERVICE1 BASE EXTENSION I EXTENSION ASSEMBLY C % v, i C/I / � ♦/p.-....-... \� , I 1 / / / _ I •. (FUTURE) (INITIAL) (INITIAL) (FUTURE) ■ ( R� - STUV8N Y N PLOMAMN Cn I TELCO BOX TT .. - �r�'.•.,' �• :• !/ % iiiit : c�W I I SLABPMENT UTILITY FRAME POp1LaN0.Op6GON C_ � St .,{Q0' HIGH / �. �\••;#' / / �J 1 I '® �p'� �� C I/ f �M:MONOPOLE W/ '� I l -� I L----j L----J L_----J '•a J4' �F' 0 ` : .,47/8k. SAL1t01N:PCS.ANTENNAS ^ I� I / v I O1' «;.. '•O Ii:v.- 2..`. 1n _ PROPOSED 2' I o K• ®' V O ��' - ^.:`.�a I NIGH CABLE i■ n +I —� �� Q .:.Y ...Fi..5 . D LANDSCAPING .. .. / `// 1 ' 'BRIDGE. I _ / . PLOW Y \ `.....:"(IO:io c. EXISTING) PLOWMAN _ y / I v ARCHITEC r +. ,;. / / I I 2701 NW Vargh■ CO �_ "®`_ EQUIPMENT ELEVATION Po31nd0,97210 ci SCALE I ^ S■ile 76f O s\ , 303 274 7803 Fax � DATE: 5/29/02 0 ••- / PROPOSED 15' X ' ' PROPOSED 6'-D' HIGH O > \ 10' SALMON PCS © i - ` CHAIN LINK FENCE W/ I • 00 A CONC. EQUIPMENT REVISIONS J STRANDS OF BARBED I •• N `\ • WIRE. Pte' ® I REV.: DATE: DESCRIPTION: C? '!`2a,• I \ \ 10•-0. • Allit •\ GRAVEL PROPOSE()PAVING Wi ,•L----EXISTING ' 7'..-rl• UNDERGROUND N INSIDE FENCED - 7 C? • �qy. +\ AREA ., I SEWER PIPES - .. / TYP. _ /• _I I ISSUED FOR ♦ I O \ \\\ �, �r / i` 0 5/29/02 ZONING REVIEW V-. \ • , .. "fir. ,• •� ..•. _ / cr) �. ` .. \ i.` '..,:r•: I BASE '� % .+• :': / (INITIAL) PLINTH PT328-01 .- .. •._ \; `rt y ASSEMBLY D_ ,\ }� EXISTING GRASS In 7 `- �- . / `� `')r'7 AREA CONCRETE 16060 SW a) , .2,,-,:.,,, a ` /� / 5IPMENT 97224 GARD OR 85TH AVE I \ `T I h ENLARGED SITE PLAN• •� *?3�I Imo````�� I� N 20 1 1 °I EQUIPMENT ELEVATION! 0 'EXISTING EXCESS' '� r \':�•Z FLOW-ONERSION ' `,{ EXISTING LANDSCAPING„ Al . 1• U S RUCTURE `' , \\ GROUND COVER i N ENLARGED SITE PLAN SCALE 1 EQUIPMENT ELEVATION j,r; 4 JOB No. 02-081 T -'•EXISTING SHRUBS—�! `\ EXITING TREES DECIDUOUS IE I TREES ( _--- ` SID WALK . 373'-r' �1- ,7 - e �Z j$ua> v POtER POLE '. i> IWAU(PATN�,•-Le J.l�^J„L'1�.�,•,, - x�j#F i■ 1� ,� ,.. y� : v a N•• I I ' '. EXISTING SHRUBS �f;" .\ as I I / •o ? LIGHT FIXTURE 1 LI W LI t I o �. a R % -.-,�`_ r.-0—,. lIGF1T FIXTURE I.1 a' ihi I LJJ C I %/ RR 0 4„. � I E3 ACCESS DRIVEWAY ///////�i E%ISTINC CRASS d • r�■11 _ W/ASPHALT PAVING ## \ LAWN t, 0 E 01 / / � Wil O 0 CO _ 0 \ O aA o m Q I 1-;� *3s-o• I �_ ` \ NOT USED j SAL- 2 W SIGN wy It/2":f'-0- { EXISTING 20' a '(" I DECIDUOUS TREES 4 �� -• I I - ��.�-J"rY�'v'1'YY•�-�� ANC DRNEWAY. O Z CNI g k. r � \..} E <O _ .2.-5 CU N I s ti. w C'rl ( I �, ' GATE TO CWS FACILItt � ' /w k \ !h`PROPOSED SITE t•\ r/ a O �` } I I EXISTING SHRUBS O I \ 1 .r �•f \\ , 1 1 x 017% DRAWINGS E%ISTINO -) \, v, ARE 50% REDUCTIONS SIDEWALK I - N I \ \ i .) ED ARe� d -1 I ' sreveX 4.x FIOPANN-3‘ , / / .,,._-1 c.T.., 7T CD I r— PRwAR. / \ f cJ) PORTLAND.aReca+_ o I + , FfuJEN / TN T9�� OF o��° PUUPI?:� Z., / f s Ancv ,r rn _ _ I I I `� / rJ; Z / ,/ • C _r- \ / / _ GAZLEY Q 1 I I � s' \ / / PLOWMAN G v-r� �; � Q Ju \ J /! ARCHITECT ° I of Mr \ NOT USED i� 3321md;97210 NO i 1 [ U .f"' 50317 7807 Fax I & \ \ DATE: 5/29/02 o I j <I o / N I y4; yg #.9 j \ REVISIONS OI WI ". \ REV.: DATE: DESCR'.PTiON: a � [ fj �, \\ co ' ° I J 1 \ / /--�' ��\ p 5/29/02 ISSUEp fOR cp > 1- 1 `r• JJ ,) \, 7 ZONING REVIEW• 1 i — 1 PT328-01 a. exlrnNGII20 ' /,-7 /• a) I ALONG OUS BTREES ' ,f / 16060 SW 85TH AVE 999999WWWwww /'/ N TIGARD,OR �I 1 AVE- J' / I FGEND• 97224 r% ^t,, I 1 VIS4f I - C.Lc VISCEARANCE [ii " i—� ` I = _ RIGHT OF WAY/ PROP. LINE ---- „�? - SITE PLAN i A1 .2 Z 1 � I N VISUAL CLEARANCE SITE PLAN 1 SCALE 1 NOT USED 14 JOB No 02-081 I -F W' 8s vi< �Z 167' Ij:: V /�/j1 Q— 3f-- U) Al MN D 2cr CC L a?JJN SfcTQR1 0 �. �f �0_ 3! iS 3 R C gr Wa' 98.R c O 'YygRR tN:RR E ANTENNA PLAN 1 ":` 11 U 2.11 a. 7. 0) N as C7 0 N \ OVERALL HEIGHT PROSOSED 4' LIGHTING ROD r PROSOSED 4' UGMTING ROD C SALMON PCS ANTENNA CL. PROPOSED (4) SALMON PCS PROPOSED (4) SALMON PCS E _ ANTENNAS. (2) ANTENNAS PER a II ANTENNAS. (2) ANTENNAS PER T SECTOR" (2) SECTORS TOTAL. SECTOR, (2) SECTORS TOTAL ANTENNAS TO BE MOUNTED ON ®' ANTENNAS TO BE MOUNTED ON ®' tiro v 5'-0' DAVIT ARMS. 5'-0' DAVIT ARMS. < CL ° O w v (D ('1 = ai N .,O Z 0 W, rn Q N E QO O it Z RINE N `'' W OD _CC OD �a O c - - NEW 100'-0* HIGH NEW 100'-0* HIGH - STEEL MONOPOLE STEEL MONOPOLE 1 1 x 1 7 DRAWINGS ip O ARE 507 REDUCTIONS o �sRED ARc .S yea a C$TSYR/I M PLOIIYAN cn C) , -n PCRTLMO.OREGON Z C a 1 q�A, of DGtV' rn o • 3 GAZLEY PLOWMAN — . ARCHITECT. N- 2701 NW Vaughn site 764 CO Po,I x0.97210 . 503 274 780 0 503 274 7803 fu r DACE: 5/29/02 co REVISIONS N .REV.: DA-E: DESCRtPT.CN: E Cr) a. CO PROPOSED SALMON PCS idEk PROPOSED 6' HIGH CHAIN LINK N EQUIPMENT CABINETS vp © PROPOSED SALMON PCS FENCE W/ 3 STRANDS OF CO BARBED WIRE. EQUIPMENT CABINETS o_ PROPOSED SALMON PCS UTILITY PROPOSED VERIZON AI BOARD & VERIZON H-FRAME PROPOSED SALMON O PROPOSED PHOTINAS BEYOND PCS UTILITY BOARD H-FRAME BEYOND Q 4/22/021SSUED FOR E O ®' & FIR TREES ZONING REVIEW 1. Alk M 1 PROPOSED 4' PROPOSED FIR TREESHOTINAS PT328-01 a s KC�s :;:ar a I I s+ U) ,, "F aa� �,,... .�.,3::,' °. ry ?, i 16060 SW 85TH AVE �-il:,A':. u s# C f . ` � a T. TIGARO,OR• .,:. .. .. '. :",,..:',:.a s:•::%*•.xx-`"&xacs ." ^* ;K w.1 2.,ea A64 a�� ? ......,, n. ..,. _ -_ 97224 a NOTE; ELEVATIONS Cr LANDSCAPING IN FOREGROUND OF J LEASE AREA NOT SHOWN FOR CLARITY. D Z q U_ - N EAST ELEVATION r�ALE 2 NORTH ELEVATION 1 SCALE 1r.r j UB'.1• 3 JOB No 02-081 • ' 2 z rsa N Q CJ kfr d Eiii:: O CL (1) N al 11111,aii N ,` OVERALL HEIGHT PROSOSEO 4' LIGHTING ROD I C.L. OF SALMON PCS ANTENNAS -] 0 D a PROPOSED (4) SALMON PCS TOP Of MONOPOLE ANTENNAS. (2) ANTENNAS PER SECTOR, (2) SECTORS TOTAL Wy T. ANTENNAS TO BE MOUNTED ON 5 VIO '-0- DAVIT ARMS. ICJ Q N CO W l r to o1 O W� cv E a'o Nom N CU W e zr M Cl) O 0) "' NEW 100-0' HIGH STEEL MONOPOLE 11x17 DRAWINGS ARE 50% REDUCTIONS cis cv ��RED ARc� CO . S1CVEN Y.N.PI.OI IMI Q C -3 C 0j PCAiLAN).OR6GON 0 0 0 .Ofp OF 6C 3 0 N $ c °' GAZLEY PLOWMAN CI . ARCHITECT` 2701 NW Vaughn State 764 CO 503 27d,Or.97210 CV 503 274 7800 O 503 274 7803 Fe= DATE: 5/29/02 0 REVISIONS os n1 REV.: DATE: DESCRIP':ON: B' CO 11 0 PROPOSED 6' HIGH CHAIN LINK PROPOSED 2' HIGH Cr) FENCE W/ 3 STRANDS OF CABLE BRIDGE. BARBED WIRE. F-' PROPOSED SALMON PCS O a PROPOSED PHOTINAS EO©ENT CABINETS ISSUED FOR O k FIR TREES I Qp 5/29/02 TONING REVIEW D" 'C SITE No c. PT328-01 _ 16060 SW 85TH AVE N Y;1 I �r° ,^ I �-- 9 224 TIGARD,OR tI CL ELEVATIONS D' D . 1 N SOUTH ELEVATION 1 NOT USED „a�.E 12 JOB No. 02.081 // /%' % • I. VERIFY LOCATION OF EXISTING UTIUTIES ri BEFORE YOU DIG. //, S 2. RELOCATE LAWN AREA SPRINKLERS ALONG % EAST FENCE LINE & TIE IRRIGATION TO EXISTING �/ AS NECESSARY. 4.7 U N 3. MOW STRIP VALL BE PLACED ALONG THE EAST / �� BOUNDARY LANE TO SEPARATE THE LAWN AND / 2 X 6 PRESSURE ADJOINING "-� U.IM TIMBER. TOENAIL ADJOINING , SHRUB BED. / -'FENDS FLUSH ^ U m rn i f� EXISTING GRADE LANDSCAPED AREA A j wTY U , / �� /f GRAVELED AREA \ L O .�+ O SIM / _: G7 L PROPOSED 4• WIDE .. / _ III—III _ _ --___ _ "' a z f� r Y r1 J U CONC. SIDEWALK �• ,•f• —III—III—I�� _-1 1 -. /'� L •� _ W Q i /. '' �I— — FASTEN w/ (3) 16 3 Li• • ��.' .f` —III—III III PENNY NAILS CO AREA NC ASPHALT j•�•• •' .1=-111—=111 I I I I I I I I I 1 I I-I I I I I (.0 4-' .•�d %'' a Z PROPOSED 4' WIDE ALUMINUM f •\` / f III=1 I I —III—I O GRADING OVER CONC. DITCH TO I—III III—I I I 2 X 4 X 18•WOODEN Q. SITE W/ HANDRAILS. REMOVE •4: /�� 11=111 — STAKE (TO BE PULED T uu� — IN A MINIMUM OF t' EXIST. HANDRAIL AS NECESSARY. �\ ,i • ..s...... .111= I I—III_ \ � INTERVALS ALONG 2 X 6 islco -/•`\. '/ -I I—III=I TIMBER AND AT BOTH•U7 '%" �u••••u••••� �� ENDS OF TIMBER) •uu•uu ••. ,J/ �u• N ••u r ` NOTE: AGGREGATE GRADE AND LANDSCAPE GRADE TO BE ESTABLISHED SIMULTANEOUSLY. C '•u••� / CONTRACTOR TO INSTALL TREATED TIMBER SEPARATOR BETWEEN ALL LANDSCAPE CO v : :• AND GRAVEL/A.C. PAVING SURFACE AREAS. 1:3 EXISTING CONCRETE /' ••`' i i SCALE y DITCH W/ HANDRAIL r• 1 LANDSCAPE SEPARATION DETAIL f NQNE 12 V a j o N 1 1. TOPSOIL SHALL CONSIST OF IMPORTED RIVER LOAM (TO CONTAIN 35 - 407E SILT) TO BE PLACED BY t°v THE LANDSCAPE CONTRACTOR. ADD TEXTURAL AMENDMENTS AND BLEND ALL COMPONENTS THOROUGHLY LM LO 4„,,,,,„„," /* I AS DESCRIBED BELOW. SOIL DEPTH IN PLANTERS SHALL BE MINIMUM OF 6• FOR SHRUBS AND GROUND H ~ /. (24) PROPOSED COVER AND 12" FOR TREES. = Cl) .. %" "/' i-- /� PHOTINA PLANTS, TO Mi N OO /S I MATCH EXISTING. 2. TEXTURAL SOIL AMENDMENTS: GARDEN CARE COMPOST: AS MANUFACTURED BY TAULMAN WEISS, NORTH O L O ■ • I I © AMERICAN SOILS PORTLAND, OREGON, MINIMUM ONE YEAR OLD, FREE FROM NOXIOUS WEED SEED AND =O1 N %'' j / • MATERIAL HARMFUL TO PLANT GROWTH. PROVIDE 3 IN SHRUB BEDS. E >O O j%' '' / 4111111./' I /l ® 3. GYPSUM: GRANULAR (CALCIUM SULFATE). SO POUNDS PER 1000 SQUARE FEET IN SHRUB AREAS.0.CV i' ----- /� I 4. AGRICULTURAL GRADE LIME: 50 POUNDS PER 1000 SQUARE FEET IN SHRUB BEDS. W -. / / % Z�411111t i /• 5. POLYMER WATER RETENTION GRANULES - FOLLOW MANUFACTURERS SPECIFICATIONS FOR QUANTITY. 'a O �' /• , J / 6. ROTOTILL ALL PLANTING AREAS TO A MINIMUM DEPTH OF 6 TO 8 INCHES. ADD TOPSOIL TEXTURAL CA / /./� T- / I AMENDMENTS AND RETILL, BLENDING AMENDMENTS WITH LOOSENED SOIL THOROUGHLY. LANDSCAPE • / CONTRACTOR SHALL REMOVE ALL STICKS STONES AND DEBRIS TURNED UP IN WORKING SOIL. AT /* ",Y""'7y COMPLETION OF SOIL PREPARATION, SOIL SHALL BE A FINE HOMOGENEOUS TEXTURE. COMPACT AREAS TO / '" -, I PROVIDE SMOOTH FINISHED GRADE. 1 1x 17 DRAWINGS // /+ / I I �-- • ARE 50% REDUCTIONS J / - /'� J I 1 `9 7. LAYOUT TREES AS DESIGNED ON THE PLAN AND EXCAVATE ALL SOILS FROM PLANTING HOLE TWO / i I / PROPOSED LEASE AREA W/ 15' TIMES THE WIDTH OF THE ROOTBALL REMOVE ALL SUBSOILS AND REFRAIN FROM USING SOILS IN -. / I \ `= X 10' SALMON PCS CONC. PLANTING MIX OR BACKFILL. PREPARE A SOIL MIX AS FOLLOWS: 2 PARTS IMPORTED AMENDED TOPSOIL, 1 N / - -- (Ai) \ J �J I EQUIPMENT PAD & GRAVEL PART COMPOST. c, /`1 /• / 1 ! /I PAVING INSIDE FENCED AREA d /,4. /• I ••• /J / I 8. TOP DRESS PLANTING AREAS WITH FERTIUZER (16-16-16. WITH MICRONUTRIENTS, AGRIFORM PLANT '•.•.;•••• TABS 20-10-5. 10 GRAM AND 21 GRAM TABLETS)AT THE FOLLOWING RATES: TREES-6 OUNCES PER •• PLANT. SHRUBS-4 OUNCES PER PUNNED,AND GROUND COVER- 1 OUNCE PER PUNT. / - , ' ..1/1,�✓. I / 9. PLANT MATERIALS MUST BE INSTALLED TO CURRENT NURSERY INDUSTRY STANDARDS AND PROPERLY I SUPPORTED TO ENSURE SURVNAL. .410! PROPOSED 100' HIGH STEEL , I 10. PUNTS MUST BE HAND WATERED AND BE IN HEALTHY CONDITION AT THE END OF 1 YEAR WARRANTY J ` l MONOPOLE W/SALMON PCS U) \a ANTENNAS O 100'-C.L. I (6) PROPOSED a •PERIOD, OR FOR 1 FULL GROWING SEASON FROM DATE OF SUBSTANTIAL COMPLETENESS, WHICHEVER IS - 3 '\ J f -7 —' DOUGLAS FIR LARGER. GAZLEY nor O \ / -`J _ PLOWMAN \•\ LANDSCAPE PLANTING NOTES I j 4.2 27 �Yaa t '�`"'�"` \411111 CO 5E131do..97210 NO •\ / 503 274 7800 O \ •\ I I DATE.717803 Fax 4/02/02 co - \• / GENERAL NOTES: REVISIONS N Rw. DA-_: DESCRIPTION. B' I •\ / / 1) THIS PLAN IS DIAGRAMMATIC ONLY. LANDSCAPE CONTRACTOR SHALL — •\ MAKE MINOR ADJUSTMENTS TO PLANS AS REQUIRED TO ACCOMMODATE VARIATIONS IN FIELD CONDITIONS INCLUDING OBSTRUCTIONS OR INTERFERENCES CO \� •� I / \ POSED BY EXISTING FEATURES (E.G. UTILITY VAULTS. UNDERGROUND ♦ C EXISTING GRASS CN1 \\\ •\ I AREA INFRASTRUCTURE. ETC.) WHICH MAY NOT BE SHOWN IN THESE DRAWINGS. 2) ALL PUNTING SHALL BE PERFORMED IN ACCORDANCE WITH THE DETAILS I- + \. •\ / / ) PROVIDED HEREIN UNLESS SUPERCEDED BY LOCAL STANDARDS. IN ALL --- CASES LOCAL JURISDICTIONAL ORDINANCES AND STANDARDS SHALL TARE \\`�1`� \ \ I /� N 20, PRECEDENCE OVER PUNS AND STANDARD DETNLS. Q 4�2/02 ISSUED FOR p, ZONING REVIEW 1. .` • 3) THE CONTRACTOR IS REQUIRED TO TAKE ALL PRECAUTIONARY MEASURES TO O \�\ �,�Y I ) PROTECT UTILITIES AND ANY OTHER UNES OR STRUCTURES NOT SHOWN S�TF No. co r" �� \ ter\, I / �„I ON THESE PUNS, AND HE IS RESPONSIBLE FOR THE PROTECTION OF, AND PT-364-01 lilt L �`.\ / ANY DAMAGE TO, THESE LINES OR STRUCTURES. d \\` -\'� © 4) PRUNING SHALL BE DONE IN ACCORDANCE WITH WESTERN CHAPTER ISA A �� I MP PRUNING STANDARDS AND BE PERFORMED AT MINIUM BY A WESTERN Q) \ --\`\` �/� PLANT MATERIAL LEGEND. CHAPTER ISA TREE WORKER, UNDER THE FULL TIME SUPERVISION OF A 18190 SE YOUNGS LN. � CERTIFIED OR CONSULTING ARBORIST. BORING,OR �( \\ i.....-\\T-.. \` �J (24) SHRUBS (VERIFY W/ EXISTING)' PHOTINA 5) THE GENERAL CONTRACTOR IS TO PROVIDE TWO-INCH LAYER OF W000 BARK 97009 -�� ` FRASERI (ROSACEAE) 6'-0• HIGH 0 4'-0'O.C. �.\ �-� SEE 2/12.0 FOR PLANTING MULCH COVER, 3/4-INCH TO ONE-INCH SIZE AT NEW SHRUB PLANTING AREA. Et \\ EXISTING EXCESS ��4414 V LANDSCAPE PLAN,NOTES FLOW DIVERSION -1 \: . STRUCTURE ` \ '�\\ / EXISTING LANDSCAPING (6) TREES: DOUGLAS FIR (PSEVDOTSUCA MENZIESIQ - - \ & GROUNDCOVER 6'-0•HIGH, 3'CAL. SEE 1/L2.0 FOR STAKING Z \ L• N LANDSCAPING PLAN 54'x1' 1 LANDSCAPE GENERAL NOTES CAL 4 JOB No 02041 NONE • .hi •.:,,%;„ V O . .1i _ �yt� C N• 4111.11.111111, c•0) (2) PRESSURE TREATED j% �+1�> `�I��1 61 QC DOUGLAS FIR 2' DIAM. �1 / �' _ '10 BASIN (TO BE CAJ C i.- • �' REMOVED PRIOR TO Z ` 1.1:111°1011" 'CRO-STRAIGHT' TREE r. /, i��y o� �. dm END O;MAINTENENCE L wPERIOD Z'- TIE (2) CROWN I 1/2• `10 ,r 49A 414 0 BURLAP IN 1 ! Ii BARK MULCH - 2' DEPTH 1��r■ I �'—`�``,�� FINISHED GRADE 4-a N O 3 FINISH ,� MI `I. if 711 •.�>�xy<, •; .11=11gIf 1 O GRADE/ I WATERING BASIN Z = r Y:^...-"..,': dll°IF'=71 PLANTING BACKFILL W/ ` 0' IL 11 .4`: I• I,I�1111 L SLOW RELEASE FERTILIZER a J np #0=11: ,,,.. IL if >. "' i PUNT TABS (PER SPECS) f iyx • - " ROOTBALL CD COMPACTED BACKFILL I UNDISTURBED SOIL N n_s L U II 11 II II II 11 half 0 -,,� - SOIL MIXTURE (PER SPECS) IfAhlhlh i="li L-1111 SCARIFY SURFACE IF -L=1111-11=II�11=7 U STAKES SHALL EXTEND MIN. GLAZED =m-�i�Lo�I I1�11., N NOTE: ONE FOOT BELOW BOTTOM SET ROOTBALL 1"ABOVE FINISH GRADE. OF PUNT PR, DO NOT C REMOVE BURLAP FROM TOP 1/3 OF PENETRATE ROOTBALL 03 ROOTBALL. CUT ALL STRINGS. E Oak TREE STAKING DETAIL 1 TREE/ SMALL SHRUB DETAIL 2 NOT USED SALE 3 vo 2 NONE a ° N CV N = N 66 oN, O Dui 0, W c) E N a O O N O /� zI- 14) Y/ gl a O CA 3 11x17 DRAWINGS N ARE 50% REDUCTION J CO �,\.R R c BD A �i STBVBN 4.N.PLO ...-1,Cam" -E-T) . a CC -3 C 01 POtnA1O.ORBfAN.t T17,,OF o��)o rn 3 GAZLEY Q PLO WMAA v ARCHITEC • NOT USED ,uT 1. 4 NOT USED `,,. 5 NOT USED �"E 6 vo�i a Vaughn o N O NONE 307 274 7800 • 303 274 7803 Fax DATE. 5/29/02 O 00 REVISIONS M REV.. DATE: DESCR:PP,ON: a N M I-- CL O� Q 5/29/02 ISSUED FOR CD REVIEW 1 N- O Np. C H PT328-01 a co' 16060 SW 85TH AVE TIGARD,OR I 97224 I- d Et- LANDSCAPING Q DETAILS J D 0 Z L2 •0 U N I NOT USED � SCALE-. 1 7 NOT USED -�,., 8 NOT USED I JOB No. 02-081 lir I. IAN CITY OF TIGARD Community Deve(.opment Siaping A Better Community LAND USE PROPOSAL DESCRIPTION 120 DAYS = 11/5/2002 FILE NO.: SITE DEVELOPMENT REVIEW (SDR) 2002-00010 Type II Land Use Application FILE TITLE: CINGULAR WIRELESS MONOPOLE TOWER @ DURHAM TREATMENT PLANT APPLICANT: Salmon PcS, Inc. OWNER: Clean Water Services 123 NE 3� Avenue, Suite 240 155 N. First Avenue, Suite 270 Portland, OR 97232 Hillsboro, OR 97124 APPLICANT'S Mericom Corporation REP.: Attn: Chris T gh 2701 NW Vaughn Street Portland, OR 97210 PHONE/FAX: 503-303-3012/503-303-3001 REQUEST: The applicant is requesting Site Development Review approval to construct a 100-foot monopole tower for telecommunications service. The associated accessory equipment will be placed within a fenced and landscaped enclosure. LOCATION: 16580 SW 85th Avenue; WCTM 2S113B0, Tax Lot 600. ZONE: I-P: Industrial Park District. The I-P zoning district provides appropriate locations for combining light manufacturing, office and small-scale commercial uses, e.g., restaurants, personal services and fitness centers, in a campus-like setting. Only those light industrial uses with no off-site impacts, e.g., noise, glare, odor, vibration, are permitted in the I-P zone. In addition to mandatory site development review, design and development standards in the I-P zone have been adopted to insure that developments will be well-integrated, attractively landscaped, and pedestrian-friendly. APPLICABLE REVIEW Community Development Code Chapters 18.390, 18.530, 18.705, 18.745, 18.765, CRITERIA: 18.795, 18.798 and 18.810. CIT AREA: South CIT FACILITATOR: List Available Upon Request DECISION MAKING BODY BELOW: ❑ TYPE I ® TYPE II ❑ TYPE III ❑ TYPE IV DATE COMMENTS WERE SENT: JULY 8, 2002 DATE COMMENTS ARE DUE: JULY 22, 2002 ❑HEARINGS OFFICER (MON.) DATE OF HEARING: TIME: 7:00 PM ❑PLANNING COMMISSION (MON.) DATE OF HEARING: TIME: 7:00 PM El CITY COUNCIL (TUES.) DATE OF HEARING: TIME: 7:30 PM ®STAFF DECISION (TENTATIVE) DATE OF DECISION: AUGUST 19, 2002 COMPONENTS RELATED TO THE PROJECT AVAILABLE FOR VIEWING IN THE PLANNING DIVISION Z VICINITY MAP ® LANDSCAPING PLAN Z IMPACT STUDY Z SITE PLAN ® SITE ELEVATIONS ❑ TRAFFIC IMPACT STUDY ® NARRATIVE LI ENVIRONMENTAL REPORT ® OTHER: MISCELLANEOUS STAFF CONTACT: Morgan Tracy, Associate Planner (503) 639-4171, Ext. 2428 LAN 1 USE APPL_CI_ON Project: ,.. v(W Man•Po�,(Cws) Sv?iz-ce•"D Date: COMPLETENESS REVIEW Li COMPLETE INCOMPLETE STANDARD-INFORMATION: Pr Deed/Title/Proof Of Ownership ® Neighborhood Mtg. Affidavits, Minutes, List Of Attendees ❑ Impact Study (18.390) USA Service Provider Letter p❑i-. Construction Cost Estimate ❑ # Sets Of Application Materials/Plans Ei l Pre-Application Conference Notes if Envelopes With Postage (Verify Count) PR JECT STATISTICS: Building Footprint Size Of Landscaping On Site El % Of Building Impervious Surface On Site Lot Square Footage PLANS DIMENSIONED: W./ Building Footprint ak- Parking Space Dimensions(Include Accessible&Bike Parking) Truck Loading Space Where Applicable [i Building Height [r Access Approach And Aisle [( Visual Clearance Triangle Shown ADDITIONAL PLANS: Vicinity Map [l Architectural Plan E(4 akon ❑ Tree Inventory Existing Conditions Plan Ind Landscape Plan RZI Site Plan AA Lighting Plan TREE PLAN/MITIGATION PLAN: ❑ ❑ ADDITIONAL REPORTS: (list any special reports) - -- RESPONSE TO APPLICABLE CODE SECTIONS: ❑ 18.330(Conditional Use) ❑ 18.620(Tigard Triangle Design Standards) ❑ 18.765(Off-Street Parking/loading Requirements) ❑ 18.340(Director's Interpretation) ❑ 1 8.630(Washington Square Regional Center) ❑ 18.775(Sensitive Lands Review) ❑ 18.350(Planned Development) ❑ I8.705(Access/Egress/Grculation) -- ❑ 18.780(signs) ❑ 18.360(Site Development Review) ❑ 1 8.7 10(Accessory Residential Units) ❑ 18.785(Temporary Use Permits) ❑ 18.370(Variances/Adjustments) ❑ 18.715(Density Computations) ❑ 18.790(Tree Removal) ❑ 1 8.380(Zoning Map/Text Amendments) ❑ 18.720(Design Compatibility Standards) I . 1 8.795(Visual Clearance Areas) --- ❑ 18.385(Miscellaneous Permits) ❑ 18.725(Environmental Performance Standards) ❑ 18.797(Water Resources(WR)Overlay District) II 18.390(Decision Making Procedures/Impact Study) -- ❑ 18.730(Exceptions To Development Standards) ❑ 18.798(Wireless Communication Facilities) -" ❑ 18.410(Lot Line Adjustments) ❑ 18.740(Historic Overlay) -I 18.810(Street&Utility Improvement Standards) ❑ 18.420(land Partitions) ❑ 1 8.742(Home Occupation Permits) ❑ 18.430(Subdivisions) ❑ 1 8.745(Landscaping&Screening Standards) ❑ 18.510(Residential Zoning Districts) ❑ 1 8.750(Manufactured/Mobil Home Regulations) ❑ 18.520(Cosmieraal Zoning Districts) ❑ 1 8.755(Mixed Solid Waste/Recycling Storage) ❑ 1 8.530(Industrial Zoning Districts) ❑ 18.760(Nonconforming Situations) ADDITIONAL ITEMS: I:\curpin\masters\revised\land use application completeness review.dot REVISED: 17-Jan-01 CITY OF TIGARD OREGON June 26, 2002 Ed Fournier 2701 NW Vaughn Street, Suite 890 Portland, OR 97210 RE: Completeness Review-Cingular Wireless Facility, Case File No. SDR2002-00010 Dear Mr. Fournier: By submitting 17 duplicate sets of additional materials, the City will have received the information necessary to begin the review of your Site Development Review application (SDR2002-00010). Staff will, upon receipt of these sets, deem your application submittal as complete and begin the review process. The estimated time for rendering a decision from the date an application is deemed complete is 5-6 weeks. Please note the counter service hours are M-F 8:00 am to 4:00 pm. Also note that all oversized plans must be folded to 8 %2" x 11" size. If you have any questions regarding your application, please don't hesitate to contact me at (503) 639-4171 ext. 2428. Sincerely, Morgan Tracy Associate Planner SDR2002-000010 Land Use File i:\curpin\morgan\workspace\sdr\sdr2002-00010(cingular#2)\sdr2002-00010 complete.doc 13125 SW Hall Blvd., Tigard, OR 97223 (503)639-4171 TDD (503)684-2772 — - -' 'i lil•4j CITY OF TIGARD OREGON July 8, 2002 Chris Tigh do Mericom, Inc. 2701 NW Vaughn Street, Suite 890 Portland, OR 97210 RE: Completeness Review-Cingular Wireless Facility, Case File No. SDR2002-00010 Dear Mr. Tigh: The City has received the 17 additional sets to make your application complete. Notices of the proposal will be sent and comments solicited. Staff will begin its review process and issue a decision typically within 5-6 weeks. Please feel free to contact me with any questions you may have. I May be reached at (503) 639-4171 ext. 2428. Sincerely, Morgan Tracy Associate Planner SDR2002-000010 Land Use File is curpinlmorganlworkspace lsdr\sdr2002-00010(cingular#2)1sdr2002-00010 final complete.doc 13125 SW Hall Blvd., Tigard, OR 97223 (503)639-4171 TDD (503)684-2772 saloN DNEflI4MOD lNiOI ,I,VDI'IddV ilild Otir OF TIGARD A p got . tons ent: q a ii NON-RESIDENTIAL RE MG DIE 5/Z-1/07, APPLICANT: So.441 or 130 t et yv r) AGENT: $ ,rL cows Corpo(Wil art Phone: ( ) Phone: 3)303 -'3°12 PROPERTY LOCATION: ADDRESS/GENERAL LOCATION: M500 5C/ gc#1 w5 ` 7xecinit, fun? TAX MAP(S)/LOT #(S): ZS 11360 00603 NECESSARY APPLICATIONS: S s!TE DEVELopmtk)r CREWEL() 5P V,) PROPOSAL DESCRIPTION: /012' mornopol*e. — wr<ttAtb3 corviefu nrc.uhon tzt_Lkl,?rzf COMPREHENSIVE PLAN �/ MAP DESIGNATION: Lcy&41r,dv�l1r-rat ZONING MAP DESIGNATION: I 1 /aids a( 7a.r( CITIZEN INVOLVEMENT TEAM (C.I.T.)AREA: Cotiftl ZONING DISTRICT DIMENSIONAL REQUIREMENTS [Refer to Code Section 18. 5 30 1 MINIMUM LOT SIZE: NZ sq. ft. Average Min. lot width: Sf) ft. Max. building height: 115 ft. Setbacks: Front ; ft. Side 0/5o ft. Rear 0/so ft. Corner ft. from street. MAXIMUM SITE COVERAGE: 75 % Minimum landscaped or natural vegetation area: 25 %. NEIGHBORHOOD MEETING [Refer to the Neighborhood Meeting Handout] THE APPLICANT SHALL NOTIFY ALL PROPERTY OWNERS WITHIN 500 FEET, THE MEMBERS OF ANY LAND USE SUBCOMMITTEE(S), AND THE CITY OF TIGARD PLANNING DIVISION of their proposal. A minimum of two (2) weeks between the mailing date and the meeting date is required. Please review the Land Use Notification handout concerning site posting and the meeting notice. Meeting is to be held prior to submitting your application or the application will not be accepted. * NOTE: In order to also preliminarily address building code standards, a meeting with a Plans Examiner is encouraged prior to submittal of a land use application. CITY OF TIGARD Pre-Application Conference Notes Page 1 of 9 NON-Residential Application/Planning Division Section Nc NARRATIVE [Refer to Code Chapter 18.3901 The APPLICANT SHALL SUBMIT A NARRATIVE which provides findings based on the applicable approval standards. Failure to provide a narrative or adequately address criteria would be reason to consider an application incomplete and delay review of the proposal. The applicant should review the code for applicable criteria. Q IMPACT STUDY [Refer to Code Sections 18.390.040 and 18.390.0501 As a part of the APPLICATION SUBMITTAL REQUIREMENTS, applicants are required to INCLUDE IMPACT STUDY with their submittal package. The impact study shall quantify the effect of the development on public facilities and services. The study shall address, at a minimum, the transportation system, including bikeways, the drainage system, the parks system, the water system, the sewer system and the noise impacts of the development. For each public facility system and type of impact, the study shall propose improvements necessary to meet City standards, and to minimize the impact of the development on the public at large, public facilities systems, and affected private property users. In situations where the Community Development Code requires the dedication of real property interests, the applicant shall either specifically concur with the dedication requirement, or provide evidence which supports the conclusion that the real property dedication requirement is not roughly proportional to the projected impacts of the development. 14 ACCESS [Refer to Chapters 18.705 and 18.165) Minimum number of accesses: Minimum access width: Minimum pavement width: All driveways and parking areas, except for some fleet storage parking areas, must be paved. Drive-in use queuing areas: I I WALKWAY REQUIREMENTS [Refer to Code Section 18305.0301 WALKWAYS SHALL EXTEND FROM THE GROUND FLOOR ENTRANCES OR FROM THE GROUND FLOOR LANDING OF STAIRS, ramps, or elevators of all commercial, institutional, and industrial uses, to the streets which provide the required access and egress. Walkways shall provide convenient connections between buildings in multi-building commercial, institutional, and industrial complexes. Unless impractical, walkways should be constructed between a new development and neighboring developments. ❑ SPECIAL SETBACKS [Refer to Code Chapter 18.130) ➢ STREETS: feet from the centerline of • LOWER INTENSITY ZONES: feet, along the site's boundary. ➢ FLAG LOT: 10-FOOT SIDE YARD SETBACK. ❑ SPECIAL BUILDING HEIGHT PROVISIONS [Refer to Code Section 18.730.010.BJ BUILDING HEIGHT EXCEPTIONS - Buildings located in a non-residential zone may be built to a height of 75 feet provided that: ➢ A maximum building floor area to site area ratio (FAR) of 1.5 to 1 will exist; ➢ All actual building setbacks will be at least half (1/2) of the building's height; and ➢ The structure will not abut a residential zoned district. [1 BUFFERING AND SCREENING [Refer to Code Chapter 18.7451 In order TO INCREASE PRIVACY AND TO EITHER REDUCE OR ELIMINATE ADVERSE NOISE OR VISUAL IMPACTS between adjacent developments, especially between different land uses, the City requires landscaped buffer areas along certain site perimeters. Required buffer areas are described by the Code in terms of width. Buffer areas must be occupied by a mixture of deciduous and evergreen trees and shrubs and must also achieve a balance between vertical and horizontal plantings. Site obscuring screens or fences may also be required; these are often advisable even if not required by the Code. The required buffer areas may only be occupied by vegetation, fences, utilities, and walkways. Additional information on required buffer area materials and sizes may be found in the Development Code. CITY OF TIGARD Pre-Application Conference Notes Page 2 of 9 NON-Residential Application/Planning Division Section The ESTIMATED REQUIRED BUFFER WIDTHS applicable to your proposal area are: feet along north boundary. feet along east boundary. feet along south boundary. feet along west boundary. IN ADDITION, SIGHT OBSCURING SCREENING IS REQUIRED ALONG: • 2 LANDSCAPING (Refer to Code Chapters 18.745,18.165 and 18.705) STREET TREES ARE REQUIRED FOR ALL DEVELOPMENTS FRONTING ON A PUBLIC OR PRIVATE STREET as well as driveways which are more than 100 feet in length. Street trees must be placed either within the public right-of-way or on private property within six (6) feet of the right-of- way boundary. Street trees must have a minimum caliper of at least two (2) inches when measured four (4) feet above grade. Street trees should be spaced 20 to 40 feet apart depending on the branching width of the proposed tree species at maturity. Further information on regulations affecting street trees may be obtained from the Planning Division. A MINIMUM OF ONE (1) TREE FOR EVERY SEVEN (7) PARKING SPACES MUST BE PLANTED in and around all parking areas in order to provide a vegetative canopy effect. Landscaped parking areas shall include special design features which effectively screen the parking lot areas from view. These design features may include the use of landscaped berms, decorative walls, and raised planters. I I RECYCLING [Refer to Code Chapter 18.7551 Applicant should CONTACT FRANCHISE HAULER FOR REVIEW AND APPROVAL OF SITE SERVICING COMPATIBILITY. Locating a trash/recycling enclosure within a clear vision area such as at the intersection of two (2) driveways within a parking lot is prohibited. Much of Tigard is within Pride Disposal's Service area. Lenny Hing is the contact person and can be reached at (503) 625-6177. PARKING (Refer to Code Section 18.765.040) REQUIRED parking for this type of use: •,r Cj + re y�,/�teJ pc(sliiy p‘tr� � I) Parking SHOWN on preliminary plan(s): ruif-cA-edlect) SECONDARY USE REQUIRED parking: Parking SHOWN on preliminary plan(s): NO MORE THAN 50% OF REQUIRED SPACES MAY BE DESIGNATED AND/OR DIMENSIONED AS COMPACT SPACES. PARKING STALLS shall be dimensioned as follows: Standard parking space dimensions: 8 feet, 6 inches x 18 feet, 6 inches. - Compact parking space dimensions: 7 feet, 6 inches x 16 feet, 6 inches. Note: Parking space width includes the width of a stripe that separates the parking space from an adjoining space. Note: A maximum of three (3) feet of the vehicle overhang area in front of a wheel stop or curb can be included as part of required parking space depth. This area cannot be included as landscaping for meeting the minimum percentage requirements. HANDICAPPED PARKING: i All parking areas shall PROVIDE APPROPRIATELY LOCATED AND DIMENSIONED DISABLED PERSON PARKING spaces. The minimum number of disabled person parking spaces to be provided, as well as the parking stall dimensions, are mandated by the Americans with Disabilities Act (ADA). A handout is available upon request. A handicapped parking space symbol shall be painted on the parking space surface and an appropriate sign shall be posted. BICYCLE RACKS ARE REQUIRED FOR MULTI-FAMILY, COMMERCIAL AND INDUSTRIAL DEVELOPMENTS. Bicycle racks shall be located in areas protected from automobile traffic and in convenient locations. LOADING AREA REQUIREMENTS (Refer to Code Section 18.765.0801 Every COMMERCIAL OR INDUSTRIAL BUILDING IN EXCESS OF 10,000 SQUARE FEET shall be provided with a loading space. The space size and location shall be as approved by the City Engineer. CITY OF TIGARD Pre-Application Conference Notes Page 3 of 9 NON-Residential Application/Planning Division Section BICYCLE RACKS [Refer to Code Section 18.7651 BICYCLE RACKS are required FOR MULTI-FAMILY, COMMERCIAL AND INDUSTRIAL DEVELOPMENTS. Bicycle racks shall be located in areas protected from automobile traffic and in convenient locations. 1.,,1 SENSITIVE LANDS (Refer to Code Chapter 181/51 17054, A arut^. & c.cc— The Code provides REGULATIONS FOR LANDS WHICH ARE POTENTIALLY UNSUITABLE FOR DEVELOPMENT DUE TO AREAS WITHIN THE 100-YEAR FLOODPLAIN, NATURAL DRAINAGEWAYS, WETLAND AREAS, ON SLOPES IN EXCESS OF 25 PERCENT, OR ON UNSTABLE GROUND. Staff will attempt to preliminary identify sensitive lands areas at the pre- application conference based on available information. HOWEVER, the responsibility to precisely identify sensitive land areas, and their boundaries, is the responsibility of the applicant. Areas meeting the definitions of sensitive lands must be clearly indicated on plans submitted with the development application. Chapter 18.775 also provides regulations for the use, protection, or modification of sensitive lands areas. RESIDENTIAL DEVELOPMENT IS PROHIBITED WITHIN FLOODPLAINS. ❑ STEEP SLOPES (Refer to Code Section 18.715.080.C1 When STEEP SLOPES exist, prior to issuance of a final order, a geotechnical report must be submitted which addresses the approval standards of the Tigard Community Development Code Section 18.775.080.C. The report shall be based upon field exploration and investigation and shall include specific recommendations for achieving the requirements of Section 18.775.080.C. gx CLEARWATER SERVICES ICWSI BUFFER STANDARDS (Refer to Rat,0 96-44/USA Regulations-Chapter 3) LAND DEVELOPMENT ADJACENT TO SENSITIVE AREAS shall preserve and maintain or create a $ vi - vegetated corridor for a buffer wide enough to protect the water quality functioning of the sensitive Tov area. Ir Design Criteria: The VEGETATED CORRIDOR WIDTH is dependent on the sensitive area. The following table identifies the required widths: TABLE 3.1 VEGETATED CORRIDOR WIDTHS SOURCE: CWS DESIGN AND CONSTRUCTION STANDARDS MANUAL/RESOLUTION & ORDER 96-44 SENSITIVE AREA DEFINITION SLOPE ADJACENT WIDTH OF VEGETATED TO SENSITIVE AREA4 CORRIDOR PER SIDE5 • Streams with intermittent flow draining: <25% 10 to <50 acres 15 feet >50 to <100 acres 25 feet • Existing or created wetlands <0.5 acre 25 feet ♦ Existing or created wetlands >0.5 acre <25% 50 feet • Rivers, streams, and springs with year-round flow • Streams with intermittent flow draining >100 acres • Natural lakes and ponds • Streams with intermittent flow draining: >25% 10 to <50 acres 30 feet >50 to <100 acres 50 feet ♦ Existing or created wetlands >25% Variable from 50-200 feet. Measure • Rivers, streams, and springs with year-round flow in 25-foot increments from the starting • Streams with intermittent flow draining >100 acres point to the top of ravine (break in • Natural lakes and ponds <25%slope), add 35 feet past the top of ravineG 4 Starting point for measurement = edge of the defined channel (bankful flow) for streams/rivers, delineated wetland boundary, delineated spring boundary, and/or average high water for lakes or ponds,whichever offers greatest resource protection. Intermittent springs, located a minimum of 15 feet within the river/stream or wetland vegetated corridor,shall not serve as a starting point for measurement. 5Vegetated corridor averaging or reduction is allowed only when the vegetated corridor is certified to be in a marginal or degraded condition. 6The vegetated corridor extends 35 feet from the top of the ravine and sets the outer boundary of the vegetated corridor. The 35 feet may be reduced to 15 feet,if a stamped geotechnical report confirms slope stability shall be maintained with the reduced setback from the top of ravine. CITY OF TIGARD Pre-Application Conference Notes Page 4 of 9 NON-Residenfial Application/Planning Division Section Restrictions in the Vegetate Corridor: NO structures, development, construction activities, gardens, lawns, application of chemicals, dumping of any materials of any kind, or other activities shall be permitted which otherwise detract from the water quality protection provided by the vegetated corridor, except as provided for in the CWS Design and Construction Standards. Location of Vegetated Corridor: IN ANY RESIDENTIAL DEVELOPMENT WHICH CREATES MULTIPLE PARCELS or lots intended for separate ownership, such as a subdivision, the vegetated corridor shall be contained in a separate tract, and shall not be a part of any parcel to be used for the construction of a dwelling unit. CWS Service Provider Letter: PRIOR TO SUBMITTAL of any land use applications, the applicant must obtain a CWS Service Provider Letter which will outline the conditions necessary to comply with the R&O 96-44 sensitive area requirements. If there are no sensitive areas, CWS must still issue a letter stating a CWS Service Provider Letter is not required. SIGNS (Refer to Code Chapter 18.1801 SIGN PERMITS MUST BE OBTAINED PRIOR TO INSTALLATION OF ANY SIGN in the City of Tigard. A "Guidelines for Sign Permits" handout is available upon request. Additional sign area or height beyond Code standards may be permitted if the sign proposal is reviewed as part of a development review application. Alternatively, a Sign Code Exception application may be filed for Director's review. 12:d TREE REMOVAL PLAN REQUIREMENTS (Refer to Code Section 18.790.030.C.] r P-u✓<<{ /v IQ,- i p 4c { A TREE PLAN FOR THE PLANTING, REMOVAL AND PROTECTION OF TREES prepared by a certified arborist shall be provided for any lot, parcel or combination of lots or parcels for which a development application for a subdivision, partition, site development review, planned development, or conditional use is filed. Protection is preferred over removal where possible. THE TREE PLAN SHALL INCLUDE the following: ➢ Identification of the location, size and species of all existing trees including trees designated as significant by the City; ➢ Identification of a program to save existing trees or mitigate tree removal over 12 inches in caliper. Mitigation must follow the replacement guidelines of Section 18.790.060.D according to the following standards and shall be exclusive of trees required by other development code provisions for landscaping, streets and parking lots: Retainage of less than 25% of existing trees over 12 inches in caliper requires a mitigation program according to Section 18.150.070.D. of no net loss of trees; Retainage of from 25 to 50% of existing trees over 12 inches in caliper requires that two- thirds of the trees to be removed be mitigated according to Section 18.790.060.D.; Retainage of from 50 to 75% of existing trees over 12 inches in caliper requires that 50% of the trees to be removed be mitigated according to Section 18.790.060.D.; 1 Retainage of 75% or greater of existing trees over 12 inches in caliper requires no mitigation; ➢ Identification of all trees which are proposed to be removed; and ➢ A protection program defining standards and methods that will be used by the applicant to protect trees during and after construction. TREES REMOVED WITHIN THE PERIOD OF ONE (1) YEAR PRIOR TO A DEVELOPMENT APPLICATION LISTED ABOVE will be inventoried as part of the tree plan above and will be replaced according to Section 18.790.060.0. 1 1 MITIGATION (Refer to Code Section 18.190.0601.1 b REPLACEMENT OF A TREE shall take place according to the following guidelines: ➢ A replacement tree shall be a substantially similar species considering site characteristics. ➢ If a replacement tree of the species of the tree removed or damaged is not reasonably available, the Director may allow replacement with a different species of equivalent natural resource value. CITY OF TIGARD Pre-Application Conference Notes Page 5 of 9 NON-Residential Application/Planning Division Section ➢ If a replacement tree of the size cut is not reasonably available on the local market or would not be viable, the Director shall require replacement with more than one tree in accordance with the following formula: The number of replacement trees required shall be determined by dividing the estimated caliper size of the tree removed or damaged, by the caliper size of the largest reasonably available replacement trees. If this number of trees cannot be viably located on the subject property, the Director may require one (1) or more replacement trees to be planted on other property within the city, either public property or, with the consent of the owner, private property. ➢ The planting of a replacement tree shall take place in a manner reasonably calculated to allow growth to maturity. IN LIEU OF TREE REPLACEMENT under Subsection D of this section, a party may, with the consent of the Director, elect to compensate the City for its costs in performing such tree replacement. R- CLEAR VISION AREA [Refer to Code Chapter 10.7951 The City requires that CLEAR VISION AREAS BE MAINTAINED BETWEEN THREE (3) AND EIGHT (8) FEET IN HEIGHT at road/driveway, road/railroad, and road/road intersections. The size of the required clear vision area depends upon the abutting streets functional classification and any existing obstructions within the clear vision area. n WATER RESOURCES OVERLAY DISTRICT [Refer to Code Section 18.797.0301 Thy WATER RESOURCES (WR) OVERLAY DISTRICT implements the policies of the Tigard Comprehensive Plan and is intended to resolve conflicts between development and conservation of sig ' icant wetlands, streams and riparian corridors identified in the City of Tigard Local Wetland nventory. Specifically, this chapter allows reasonable economic use of property while establishin \clear and objective standards to: protect significant wetlands and streams; limit development lR designated riparian corridors; maintain and enhance water quality; maximize flood storage capacit • reserve native plant cover; minimize streambank erosion; maintain and enhance fish and wildlife bitats; and conserve scenic, recreational and educational values of water resource areas. Safe Harbor: The WR OVERLAY DISTR CT ALSO MEETS THE REQUIREMENTS OF STATEWIDE PLANNING GOAL 5 (Natural Resources) and the "safe harbor" provisions of the Goal 5 administrative rule (OAR 660, Division 23). These provisions require that "significant" wetlands and riparian corridors be mapped and Protected. The Tua1 in River, which is also a "fish-bearing stream," has an average annual flow of more than 1000 cfs. Major Streams: Streams which are mapped as "FISH-BEARING STREAMS" by the Oregon Department of Forestry and have an average annual flow less than 1150 cubic feet per second (cfs). ➢ Major streams in Tigard include FANNO REEK, ASH CREEK (EXCEPT THE NORTH FORK AND OTHER TRIBUTARY CREEKS) A D BALL CREEK. Minor Streams: Streams which are NOT "FISH-BEARING STREAMS" according to Oregon Department of Forestry maps . Minor streams in Tigard include Summer Creek, Der Dell Creek, Red Rock Creek, North Fork of Ash Creek and certain short tributaries of the Tualatin er. Riparian Setback Area: This AREA IS MEASURED HORIZONTALLY FROM AND PARALLEL TO MAJOR STREAM OR TUALATIN RIVER TOP-OF-BANKS, OR THE EDGE OF AN ASSOCIATED WETLAND, whichever is greater. The riparian setback is the same as the "riparian corridor boundary" in OAR 660-23- 090(1)(d). CITY OF TIGARD Pre-Application Conference Notes Page 6 of 9 NON-Residential Application/Planning Division Section ➢ The standard TUALATIN RIVER RIPARIAN SETBACK IS 75 FEET, unless modified in accordance with this chapter. ➢ The MAJOR STREAMS RIPARIAN SETBACK IS 50 FEET, unless modified in accordance with this chapter. ➢ ISOLATED WETLANDS AND MINOR STREAMS (including adjacent wetlands) have no riparian setback; however, a 25-foot "water quality buffer" is required under Cleanwater Services (CWS) standards adopted and administered by the City of Tigard. RIPARIAN SETBACK REDUCTIONS [Refer to Code Section 18.197.1001 The DIRECTOR MAY APPROVE A SITE-SPECIFIC REDUCTION OF THE TUALATIN RIVER OR ANY MAJOR STREAM RIPARIAN SETBACK BY AS MUCH AS 50% to allow the placement of structures or impervious surfaces otherwise prohibited by this chapter, provided that equal or better protection for identified major stream resources is ensured through streambank restoration and/or enhancement of riparian vegetation in preserved portions of the riparian setback area. Eligibility for Riparian Setback in Disturbed Areas. TO BE ELIGIBLE FOR A RIPARIAN SETBACK REDUCTION, the applicant must demonstrate that the riparian corridor was substantially disturbed at the time this regulation was adopted. This determination must be based on the Vegetation Study required by Section 18.797.100 that demonstrates all of the following: Native plant species currently cover less than 80% of the on-site riparian corridor area; The tree canopy currently covers less than 50% of the on-site riparian corridor and healthy trees have not been removed from the on-site riparian setback area for the last five years; ➢ That vegetation was not removed contrary to the provisions of Section 18.797.100 regulating removal of native plant species; • That there will be no infringement into the 100-year floodplain; and • The average slope of the riparian area is not greater than 20%. n ADDITIONAL LOT DIMENSIONAL REQUIREMENTS [Refer to Code Section 18.810.0601 MINIMUM LOT FRONTAGE: 25 feet unless lot is created through the minor land partition process. Lots created as part of a partition must have a minimum of 15 feet of frontage or have a minimum 15-foot wide access easement. The DEPTH OF ALL LOTS SHALL NOT EXCEED 2'/2 TIMES THE AVERAGE WIDTH, unless the parcel is less than 1Y2 times the minimum lot size of the applicable zoning district. CODE CHAPTERS - 18.330(Conditional Use) 18.620(Tigard Triangle Design Standards) - 18.765(Off-Street Parking/Loading Requirements) - 18.340(Directors Interpretation) 18.630(Washington Square Regional Center) ? 18.775(Sensitive Lands Review) -8.350(Planned Development) ✓,18.705(Access/Egress/Circulation) _ 18.780(Signs) 18.360(Site Development Review) 18.710(Accessory Residential Units) 18.785(Temporary Use Permits) - 18.370(Variances/Adjustments) 18.715(Density Computations) 18.790(Tree Removal) - 18.380(Zoning Map/Text Amendments) 18.720(Design Compatibility Standards) 18.795(Visual Clearance Areas) 18.385(Miscellaneous Permits) 18.725(Environmental Performance Standards) 18.797(Water Resources(WR)Overlay District) 18.390(Decision Making Procedures/Impact Study) 18.730(Exceptions To Development Standards) 18.798(Wireless Communication Facilities) 18.410(Lot Line Adjustments) 18.740(Historic Overlay) 18.810(Street&Utility Improvement Standards) _ 18.420(Land Partitions) 18.742(Home Occupation Permits) - 18.430(Subdivisions) 18.745(Landscaping&Screening Standards) - 18.510(Residential Zoning Districts) 18.750(Manufactured/Mobil Home Regulations) 18.520(Commercial Zoning Districts) 18.755(Mixed Solid Waste/Recycling Storage) 18.530(Industrial Zoning Districts) 18.760(Nonconforming Situations) CITY OF TIGARD Pre-Application Conference Notes Page 7 of 9 NON-Residential Application/Planning Division Section • ADDITIONAL CONCERNS OR COMMENTS: 1111 e./1/1 7 rc_P/UL/LI-Cr- �-�fr S 3 dI 5 4/Y.l�A-+ PROCEDURE / V Administrative Staff Review. Public hearing before the Land Use Hearings Officer. Public hearing before the Planning Commission. Public hearing before the Planning Commission with the Commission making a recommendation on the proposal to the City Council. An additional public hearing shall be held by the City Council. APPLICATION SUBMITTAL PROCESS All APPLICATIONS MUST BE ACCEPTED BY A PLANNING DIVISION STAFF MEMBER of the Community Development Department at Tigard City Hall offices. PLEASE NOTE: Applications submitted by mail or dropped off at the counter without Planning Division acceptance may be returned. The Planning counter closes at 4:00 PM. Maps submitted with an application shall be folded IN ADVANCE to 8.5 by 11 inches. One (1), 81/' x 11" map of a proposed project should be submitted for attachment to the staff report or administrative decision. Application with unfolded maps shall not be accepted. The Planning Division and Engineering Department will perform a preliminary review of the application and will determine whether an application is complete within 30 days of the counter submittal. Staff will notify the applicant if additional information or additional copies of the submitted materials are required. CITY OF TIGARD Pre-Application Conference Notes Page 8 of 9 NON-Residential Application/Planning Division Section The administrative decision or public hearing will typically occur approximately 45 to 60 days after an application is accepted as being complete by the Planning Division. Applications involving difficult or protracted issues or requiring review by other jurisdictions may take additional time to review. Written recommendations from the Planning staff are issued seven (7) days prior to the public hearing. A 10-day public appeal period foljovs all land use decisions. An appeal on this matter would be heard by the Tigard Ne;•, tn � �u . A basic flow chart which illustrates the review process is available from the Planning Division upon request. Land use applications requiring a public hearing must have notice posted on-site by the applicant no less than 10 days prior to the public hearing. This PRE-APPLICATION CONFERENCE AND THE NOTES OF THE CONFERENCE ARE INTENDED TO INFORM the prospective applicant of the primary Community Development Code requirements applicable to the potential development of a particular site and to allow the City staff and prospective applicant to discuss the opportunities and constraints affecting development of the site. BUILDING PERMITS PLANS FOR BUILDING AND OTHER RELATED PERMITS WILL NOT BE ACCEPTED FOR REVIEW UNTIL A LAND USE APPROVAL HAS BEEN ISSUED. Final inspection approvals by the Building Division will not be granted until there is compliance with all conditions of development approval. These pre-application notes do not include comments from the Building Division. For proposed buildings or modifications to existing buildings, it is recommended to contact a Building Division Plans Examiner to determine if there are building code issues that would prevent the structure from being constructed, as proposed. Additionally, with regard to Subdivisions and Minor Land Partitions where any structure to be demolished has system development charge (SDC) credits and the underlying parcel for that structure will be eliminated when the new plat is recorded, the City's policy is to apply those system development credits to the first building permit issued in the development (UNLESS OTHERWISE DIRECTED BY THE DEVELOPER AT THE TIME IN WHICH THE DEMOLITION PERMIT IS OBTAINED). PLEASE NOTE: The conference and notes cannot cover all Code requirements and aspects related to site planning that should apply to the development of your site plan. Failure of the staff to provide information required by the Code shall not constitute a waiver of the applicable standards or requirements. It is recommended tha-t a prospective applicant either obtain and read the Community Development Code or ask any questions of City staffrelative to Code requirements prior to submitting an application. AN ADDITIONAL PRE-APPLICATION FEE AND CONFERENCE WILL BE REQUIRED IF AN APPLICATION PERTAINING TO THIS PRE-APPLICATION CONFERENCE IS SUBMITTED AFTER A PERIOD OF MORE THAN SIX (6) MONTHS FOLLOWING THIS CONFERENCE (unless deemed as unnecessary by the Planning Division). PREPARED BY: OR6R'N' 1 Rti-oY ?(u.,,, e/ CITY OF TIGARD PLANNING DIVISION - STAFF PERSON HOLDING PRE-APP. MEETING PHONE: (503) 639-4171 FAX: (503) 684-7291 E-MAIL (staffs first name)@ci.tigard.or.us TITLE18(CITY OF TIGARD'S COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT CODE)INTERNETADDRESS: www.ci.tigard.or.us H:lpattylmasters\Pre-App Notes Commercial.doc Updated: 1-Nov-2001 (Engineering section:preapp.eng) CITY OF TIGARD Pre-Application Conference Notes Page 9 of 9 NON-Residential Application/Planning Division Section CITY OF TIGARD LAND USE APPLICATION CHECKLIST Please read this form carefully in conjunction with the notes provided to you at the pre- application conference. This checklist identifies what is required for submittal of a complete land use application. Once an application is deemed complete by Community Development staff, a decision may be issued within 6-8 weeks. If you have additional questions after reviewing all of the information provided to you, please contact the staff person named below at the City of Tigard Planning Division, (503) 639-4171. Staff: 1"10 r-9 can \Tra c y Date: c/Z• /0- 1. BASIC INFORMATION ALL LAND USE APPLICATIONS REQUIRE THE FOLLOWING: Completed Application Form with property owner's signature or name of agent and letter of authorization Title transfer instrument or grant deed Written summary of proposal Narrative demonstrating compliance with all applicable development standards and approval criteria (as specified in the Pre-Application Conference notes) Two (2) sets of stamped, addressed #10 envelopes for all owners of property within 500 feet of the subject property. Mailing envelopes shall be standard legal-size (#10), addressed with 1" x 4" labels (see envelope submittal requirements). Property owner mailing lists must be prepared by the City for a minimal fee (see request for 500' property owner mailing list form). Documentary evidence of neighborhood meeting (if required) Impact Study per Section 18.390.040.B.2.(e) Copy of the Pre-Application Conference notes Filing Fee 2. PLANS REQUIRED In addition to the above basic information, each type of land use application will require one or more of the following maps or plans. PLEASE SUBMIT EACH OF THE PLANS CHECKED BELOW WITH YOUR APPLICATION (Section 5 of this checklist provides details on what information to include on each plan): l� Vicinity Map C3"/ Preliminary Grading/Erosion Control Plan l Existing Conditions Map C-3"/ Preliminary Utilities Plan ❑ Subdivision Preliminary Plat Map IS' Preliminary Storm Drainage Plan ❑ Preliminary Partition/Lot Line Adjustment Plan (OD Tree Preservation/Mitigation Plan neceSSc L Y v Site Development Plan Er Architectural Drawings 2' Landscape Plan ❑ Sign Drawings ❑ Public Improvements/Streets Plan 3. NUMBER OF COPIES REQUIRED The City requires multiple copies of submittal materials. The number of copies required depends on the type of review process. FOR AN APPLICATION SUCH AS YOU ARE PROPOSING THE CITY REQUIRES 3+n�}1a( COPIES OF ALL APPLICATION MATERIALS. -2O r[' seh w� L- r4&e pJ AA, Ctrl co,nn�]._ [:-o+vt.)(2-kit t ', re✓«,✓- ^( 1 �i City of Tigard Land Use Application Checklist Page 1 of 5 • 4. SPECIAL STUDIES AND REPORTS Because of the nature of your project and/or the site you propose to develop, THE FOLLOWING ADDITIONAL STUDIES WILL BE REQUIRED. These studies must be prepared by certified professionals with experience in the appropriate field: ❑ Local Streets Traffic Study ❑ Wetlands/Stream Corridor Delineation and Report ❑ Habitat Area Evaluation ❑ Geotechnical Report ❑ Geotechnical Report must address liquefaction potential and soil bearing capacity ❑ Other 5. PREPARING PLANS AND MAPS Plans and maps should be prepared at an engineering scale (1" = 10/20/50/100/200') and include a north arrow, legend and date. The same scale should be used for all your plans. Where possible the City prefers the use of a scale that allows a site plan or subdivision plat to be shown on a single sheet. Architectural drawings may be prepared at an architectural scale. One copy of each plan must be submitted in photo-ready 81/2 x 11 format. THE FOLLOWING IS A LIST OF REQUIRED INFORMATION FOR EACH TYPE OF PLAN (If the plans you submit do not include all of the information requested because you feel it is not applicable, please indicate this and provide a brief explanation). Vicinity Map Showing the location of the site in relation to: • Adjacent properties ❑ • Surrounding street system including nearby intersections ❑ • Pedestrian ways and bikeways ❑ • Transit stops ❑ • Utility access ❑ Existing Conditions Map Parcel boundaries, dimensions and gross area ❑ Contour lines (2' intervals for 0-10% slopes or 5' for slopes >10%) ❑ Drainage patterns and courses on the site and on adjacent lands ❑ Potential natural hazard areas including: ♦ Floodplain areas ❑ • Areas having a high seasonal water table within 24" of the surface for three or more weeks of the year ❑ • Slopes in excess of 25% ❑ • Unstable ground ❑ • Areas with severe soil erosion potential ❑ • Areas having severely weak foundation soils ❑ • Locations of resource areas including: • Wildlife habitat areas identified in the Comprehensive Plan ❑ ♦ Wetlands ❑ Other site features: • Rock outcroppings ❑ • Trees with >_6" caliper measured 4'from ground level ❑ Location and type of noise sources ❑ Locations of existing structures and their uses ❑ Locations of existing utilities and easements ❑ Locations of existing dedicated right-of-ways ❑ City of Tigard Land Use Application Checklist Page 2 of 5 • Subdivision Preliminary Plat Map The proposed name of the subdivision ❑ Vicinity map showing property's relationship to arterial and collector streets ❑ • Names, addresses and telephone numbers of the owner, developer, engineer surveyor and designer(as applicable) ❑ • Scale, north arrow and date ❑ Boundary lines of tract to be subdivided Names of adjacent subdivisions or names of recorded owners of adjoining parcels of un-subdivided land ❑ Contour lines related to a City-established benchmark at 2' intervals for 0-10% grades and 5' intervals for grades greater than 10% ❑ The purpose, location, type and size of all of the following (within and adjacent to the proposed subdivision): • Public and private right-of-ways and easements ❑ • Public and private sanitary and storm sewer lines ❑ ♦ Domestic water mains including fire hydrants ❑ ♦ Major power telephone transmission lines (50,000 volts or greater) ❑ ♦ Watercourses ❑ • Deed reservations for parks, open spaces, pathways and other land encumbrances ❑ ♦ The location of all trees with a diameter 6 inches or greater measured at 4 feet above ground level ❑ • The location of all structures and the present uses of the structures, and a statement of which structures are to remain after platting ❑ • Supplemental information including: • Proposed deed restrictions (if any) ❑ • A proposed plan for provision of subdivision improvements ❑ Existing natural features including rock outcroppings, wetlands and marsh areas The proposed lot configurations, lot sizes and dimensions, and lot numbers. Where lots are to be used for purposes other than residential, it shall be indicated upon such lots ❑ If any of the foregoing information cannot practicably be shown on the preliminary plat, it shall be incorporated into a narrative and submitted with the application materials ❑ Preliminary Partition/Lot Line Adjustment Plan • The owner of the subject parcel ❑ • The owner's authorized agent ❑ The map scale, north arrow and date ❑ Proposed property lines ❑ Description of parcel location and boundaries ❑ Contour lines (2' intervals for slopes 0-10% or 5' for slopes >10%) ❑ Location, width and names of streets, easements and other public ways within and adjacent to the parcel ❑ Location of all permanent buildings on and within 25' of all property lines ❑ Location and width of all water courses ❑ Location of any trees with 6" or greater caliper at 4' above ground level ❑ All slopes greater than 25% ❑ Location of existing and proposed utilities and utility easements ❑ Any applicable deed restrictions ❑ Evidence that land partition will not preclude efficient future land division where applicable ❑ Future street extension plan showing existing and potential street connections ❑ City of Tigard Land Use Application Checklist Page 3 of 5 • Site Development Plan • The proposed site and surrounding properties ❑ Contour line intervals ❑ The locations, dimensions and proposed names of the following: • Existing and platted streets and other public ways ❑ • Easements on the site and on adjoining properties ❑ ♦ Proposed streets or other public ways and easements on the site ❑ • Alternative routes of dead-end or proposed streets that require future extensions ❑ • The locations and dimensions of the following: ♦ Entrances and exits on the site ❑ • Parking and circulation areas ❑ ♦ Loading and service areas ❑ • Pedestrian and bicycle circulation ❑ ♦ Outdoor common areas ❑ ♦ Above ground utilities ❑ • Trash and recyclable material areas ❑ The locations, dimensions and setback distances of the following: ♦ Existing permanent structures, improvements, utilities and easements which are located on the site and on adjacent property within 25' of the site ❑ • Proposed structures, improvements, utilities and easements on the site ❑ • Sanitary sewer facilities ❑ • Existing or proposed sewer reimbursement agreements ❑ ♦ Storm drainage facilities and analysis of downstream conditions ❑ • Locations and type(s)of outdoor lighting considering crime prevention techniques ❑ The locations of the following: • All areas to be landscaped ❑ • Mailboxes ❑ • Structures and their orientation ❑ Landscape Plan • Location of trees to be removed ❑ Location, size and species of existing plant materials ❑ General location, size and species of proposed plan materials ❑ • Landscape narrative that addresses: • Soil conditions and how plant selections were derived for them ❑ ♦ Plans for soil treatment such as stockpiling the top soil ❑ ♦ Erosion control measures that will be used ❑ Location and description of the irrigation system where applicable ❑ Location and size of fences, buffer areas and screening ❑ Location of terraces, decks, shelters, play areas, and common open spaces ❑ Public Improvements/Streets Plan • Proposed right-of-way locations and widths ❑ • A scaled cross-section of all proposed streets plus any reserve strips ❑ Approximate centerline profiles showing the finished grade of all streets including street extensions for a reasonable distance beyond the limits of the proposed subdivision ❑ City of Tigard Land Use Application Checklist Page 4 of 5 Grading/Erosion Control Plan The locations and extent to which grading will take place ❑ Existing and proposed contour lines ❑ Slope ratios ❑ Utilities Plan Approximate plan and profiles of proposed sanitary and storm sewers with grades and pipe sizes indicated on the plans ❑ Plan of the proposed water distribution system, showing pipe sizes and the locations of valves and meter sizes ❑ Fire hydrants (existing and proposed) ❑ Proposed fire protection system ❑ Preliminary Storm Drainage Plan The location of all areas subject to inundation or storm water overflow ❑ Location, width and direction of flow of all water courses and drainageways ❑ Location and estimated size of proposed storm drainage lines ❑ Where applicable, location and estimated size and dimensions of proposed water quality/detention facility ❑ Tree Preservation/Mitigation Plan Identification of the location, size and species of all existing trees ❑ Program to save existing trees or mitigate tree removal (Section 18.790.030) ❑ A protection program defining standards and methods to be used during and after construction ❑ Architectural Drawings Floor plans indicating the square footage of all structures and their proposed use ❑ Elevation drawings for each elevation of the structure ❑ Sign Drawings Specify proposed location, size and height ❑ is\;curpin\masters\revised\checklist.doc 18-Sep-01 City of Tigard Land Use Application Checklist Page 5 of 5 A PRE-APPLICATION z`°i i'`I, CONFERENCE REQUEST CITY OF TIGARD 13125 SW Hall Blvd., Tigard, OR 97223 (503) 639-4171 FAX:(503) 684-7297 GENERAL INFORMATION �I J°1 FOR STAFF USE.ONL'4f e' �.. Salmon PCS, LLC; Mericom Corporation as I;�(,��1 t� fi #: Applicant: ., t, f °r-i t `� ''t Address: 25977 SW Canyon Ck Rd, E Phone: 503-303-3012 4''m -` t-..._.,- --,,` r `j �, ,`; '' s �a C.ty: Wilsonville Zip: 97070 } t. Jp ®_ T1- , 'f.-'4i"qA -F�4 Ed Fournier 503-303-3012 V13llt ttQ r b girr » 'a, 7'.''' �. =',l Contact Person: Phone: }1 `F' �4 st i , ,t ale* 5,. : # Y _ � I. Property OwnerlDeed Holder(s): „ 0.407,t4ir r;,.--.-i7d'r,:., t 'n +, � 73, ,..": Clean Water Services .; �: ' - � Lv g, 16060 SW 85th Ave 684 4617 �g ,,: { : �'�'ea' - .- X44 �K t R!s_t. L�� KC Address: Phone: „� ,,�a a il R � _, City: Tigarrd, OR Zip: 97224 , 1 ' "s + i6pili .. .. Property AddresslLocation(s): 16580 SW 85th Ave, Tigard, OR ,I REQUIRED SUBMITTAL ELEMENTS 1 (Note: applications will not be accepted without the required submittal elements) Tax Map & Tax Lot#(s): 2S-1-13B0-00600 0 Pre-Application Conf. Request Form Site Size: 50 AC 2 COPIES EACH OF THE FOLLOWING: Q'Brief Description of the Proposal and PRE-APPLICATION CONFERENCE INFORMATION any site-specific questions/issues that you would like to have staff research prior to the meeting. All of the information identified on this form are required to be submitted by the applicant and received by the Planning Division a Site Plan. The site plan must show the minimum of one (1) week prior .to officially scheduling a proposed lots and/or building layouts pre-application conference date/time to allow staff ample time to drawn to scale. Also, show the location of the subject property in relation to the prepare for the meeting. nearest streets; and the locations of driveways on the subject properly and A pre-application conference can usually be scheduled within 1-2 across the street. weeks of the Planning Division's receipt of the request for either Tuesday or Thursday mornings, Pre-application conferences are „.../ The Proposed Uses. one (1) hour long and are typically held between the hours of , Er Topographic Information. Include 9:00-11:00 AM. Contour Lines if Possible. 0 If the Pre-Application Conference is for a PRE-APPLICATION CONFERENCES MUST BE SCHEDULED IN MONOPOLE project, the applicant must PERSON AT THE COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT COUNTER FROM attach a copy of the letter and proof in 8:00-4:00/MONDAY-FRIDAY. the form of an affidavit of mailing, that the collocation protocol was completed IF MORE THAN 4 PEOPLE ARE EXPECTED TO ATTEND THE (see Section 18./98.080 of the Tigard PRE-APPLICATION CONFERENCE IN YOUR GROUP, PLEASE ommunity Development Code). INFORM THE CITY IN ADVANCE SO THAT ALTERNATE ROOM iling Fee$240.00 APweM( UIJTC CAM RG MenP Tn err_ni mnneTF TUG 1 Pre-Apps (CD Meetings) May2002 S M T W T F S 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 Tuesday, May 21, 2002 8:00 8:30 9:00 Pre-app Matt Sprague 503.452.8003 13710 SW Hall Multi family 9:30 10:00 Pre-app appt Jack Bond 503245 2158 MLP 9640 SW Frewing 10:30 11:00 Pre app Salmon F' S$ R 16580 85th Avenue 11:30 12:00 12:30 1:00 1:30 2:00 2:30 3:00 3:30 4:00 4:30 5:00 5:30 6:00 8:36AM Wednesday, May 15, 2002 • MERICOM." C O R P ❑ R A T I O N May 14, 2002 Mr. Morgan Tracy RECEIVED City of Tigard Community Development Department 13125 SW Hall Blvd. Tigard, OR 97223 CITY OF TIGARD PLANNING/ENGINEERING RE: Salmon PCS pre-application for a new mono-pole. Dear Mr. Tracy: On behalf of Salmon PCS, I am submitting the following land use pre-application to develop a new mono- pole and place equipment in a fenced and screened compound located at 16580 SW 85th Avenue, Tigard. Please find enclosed the following land use information: A. Pre-application conference request form B. Project Narrative and Development Code questions C. Site Plan D. The proposed use E. Topographic Information F. Collocation request letter and proof of mailing E. Filing Fee: a check for $240.00 is enclosed Please feel free to contact me with any questions you may have. Thank you for your attention to this matter. Sincerely, MERICOM CORPORATION rd (Ed F. ournier Senior Project Manager Direct Line: 503/303-3012 E-Mail: Ed.Fournier @Mericom.com 25977 SW CANYON CREEK ROAD, SUITE E, WILSONVILLE, OREGON 97070, U.S.A. TELEPHONE: (503) 303-3000 / FAX: (503) 303-3001 • Pre-application submittal elements A. Pre-application request form is attached. B. Proposal Description Salmon PCS, LLC (Salmon) proposes a new 100' mono-pole in the Clean Water Services Durham Treatment Plant located at 16580 SW 85th Ave. 2 antennas for each of 3 sectors attached onto the mono-pole via 5' davit arms at an elevation of 100'. Surplus space in the equipment area and mono- pole not reserved for future expansion by Salmon shall be made reasonably available for future collocation by other carriers. Access shall be via the existing paved roadway from SW 85th Ave. Salmon's proposed site is an unmanned facility, and would not require any water, waste treatment or management of hazardous materials. During construction or operation of the site, minimal traffic would be generated as a result of the facility. Once construction is completed, an equipment technician would visit the site approximately one time per month for routine maintenance purposes only. The proposed installation consists of installing up to 5 small equipment cabinets approximately (30"x30"x60" tall) that will be located inside the proposed compound. As call volume increases at the site additional cabinets may be added. Staff Questions and Issues 1. Type of approval process required by the city and associated timelines. 2. Can "pre-existing and approved" criteria be addressed as such for this facility as it was historically outside of the Tigard City limits. C. Site Plan — please see attached. D. The proposed use is for development of a new mono-pole, antennas, and equipment placed in a to be developed fenced and screened compound. E. Topographic Information. The elevation of the existing land area is approximately 200' MSL. The area is essentially flat. The surrounding topography is also essentially flat, with a slight slope to the south. F. Attached is a copy of the letter sent to carriers operating in the Tigard area. Also, the required affidavit of mailing has been provided in the form of copies of the USPS Receipt of Certified Mailing. Not one response has been received. If a collo possibility is presented to us prior to the pre- application meeting date, that information shall be presented by the Applicant at the meeting. G. A check for the Filing Fee of$240.00 is enclosed. MERICOM'M C O R P O R A T I O N I - f � ( _ I ° a 1 . ° I N e ° Pi a SCHOOL ACSS ROM - ft' —8 \. V ° f_ HDR Engineering, Inc. TO DURHAM I! r• '-----1‘—"- •1 II/ I I O Y DURHAM SECONDARY .- 1-1-3.11--11 I TREATMENT FACIIfTIES PROJECT 4 i�Ji (� �1� • 1�1 I. 1 ,unam, JANUARY 1999 - FEBRUARY 2000 1 1 1,i— :�—°� , jam, p. ! ' —� f—._._•:,_,I—',, .i_ ( B 'I ° i 1 DURHAM 1 ! - I e--(SEC , i • FACILITY 1 — I ' f I 1 / i �� I—.—.—`1 S PHASE 3' . _ - - - - ,roil - a NNW IIN�; � ; ---- '—.—, EXPANSION i J ~ • • a • . a ° --� ° �* 1 ,. 11: 1 EIS ° . \� Project Manoper. \\:\. S. RALE B. WILLEY .4# 44) Designed . S. HALE p 0 PC sED IF 4.1411,101:. 0 ..... o R * I "• l Checked• 9 ' 1 `1 S ` . I \ EoA` ° _ . M I Project Number it I ..........,, . ,1 • I ` 00039—�36-102 Data ° ,- %' NOVEMBER 1999• ■ 1 SEC 2 L /• 4 '-', //// v 1 • oermu 1 i t �•., o O FlLTER BACK '4rt�.dr'''''.1 4 1 W r 1 WAS BASIN ° ° '- .: "c F•ogO9'• /� � 1114' Imo:--. 1 I `' STAGING AREA 3 / J o 1111S UNE IS ONE MI MEN „ * r DRAWING IS FU U.SOE. F NOT ilk I tADMINtSTRATION o / // ONE NC41,SCAM ACCORDINGLY.41111/ 4' .• t, 4lai, B DK:ESTER _ ; SouDS r� CONTRACTOR'S Its O ,.� 4BUILDING/0' . +'r/* i DTFl O PARKING AND ` --' , .• ) o -r I STAGING AREA 1 1\I ° �+ �\V . ,_ , ' `I, SHOP �j�w 0 . ; / ..-----' 0 _ ' \ /, DIGESTER 1 i :f4 f , , _ / a)_ 4040,,pw, . - ......_, /--- - /r""" /- i IsrAdNC 2 ° •IFTHIc-KENefr /' / �l . % SPECIFlC NOTES: o I 1' / TANK i 0 MAINTAIN TRUCK ACCESS v `"�'-r 1.1 i/ d°\ 1' souos BUILDING INCINERATOR TO BK>-50005 —_ 11 /. f 1 ,% I1 ROOM DEMOUTION PROJECT LOADING AREA DI 111 I / D - AUGUST 1999 - MARCH 2000 k:::) , «;litlt, !1•r.\ '/ ;' - / AT AU_T1MES VEHICLE r. i, 3 MAINTAIN TRUCK ! \I t • .",/,' `,i ACCESS TO CHEMICAL BUILDING. ' / �— I' tl ■ ;// ; SITE PLAN- II .--� ,. • QQ MAINTAIN Y SEF AGE U To CONTRACTOR'S O I I roll TEMPORARY SEPTACE DUMP ,I . I° . , ./,' �A +• SITE ACCESS AND li • N ---J ///' ' t , STAGING AREA 1111/ II` ( 11 ' DURHAM ADVANCED WASTEWATER t"ii TREATMENT FACILITY SITE PLAN 1 ■ } 1 ,- 100' sI,..L Number 9 d �, vEtlng,. i 5/Y 4/02 1 O:30t, - Ma r ico111 -' •' • -0404 «fit .. l,r.� g `3 s i. -..,7.-.,'*ti: ,t`'1- ,t �` - + - :sae-c4�..�.4. .; r: 1 °.K#' �• ` �''I '2002 TUE 11 :30 AM Giti. Y PLOWMAN ARCHITECT 'u,,327 78 3 k T.'a �•'. ' lY d '` 7f ', P g61q y1k y% ♦ 4 , i1GtYYK Tp C . SR � .Xs �; • j./ it .••t PROPO=ED e WI6 caAciwG mat CONC. DITCH Y'0 . ISfitti. „ { s,, 7*�^'1 fi' 5rrE / ,E:.111111V 'tea rI¢: ° ' 1, , ;/'97117: Ex s11NG nsri T yJ •% '" 11P,Rigii. DILNCWAV • � . /` ur ItaL 1 ji .- 1. y /. `. 'Zi111 C1!.. 4 ...,..0.:1 a .g,e . sa S „, t; ` U.1 EXISTING CONCREFE ✓ lt,i$:tI i f#..1/ \ '•�' ' y,,.f WC- DITCH - It; _ VA —-.-:-` -••'• ' • A•..1...e ..,,,„i-A.,...,y4,-;-.-.: ....,...,":„:„.:,-,-:„::,_ ..._ ,,,... :lir,. y■ ---. . Algot7:1,..! , ., , _ ....,!,.:.,,;:.,_.,:.,.:,:,,,.,14-. . , . , ....4„,_,..:4 ,_-- .. .4,... r.ri , 'C'•4,;"9' 1111,..17`', \ If .••/ ue t .,.i. . �, ••. • • ' / ` xtT, ' I•' 'A ; � ' 1 x' cs k:' +. % �, / i If 41\ 4./ / iito •k r 4;,' .:),IR9c4,• • . .:,-4.... '' ' 4-e. Vp .. . ' -7 g s_: MOPQSFO IOW NIGH `., /� • # '+.^ �, SILt1,MONOPOLE W/ / �1 ✓ ryP s trg•',3t.• F .... e.∎o: res ANTENNAS p — ',+ �[ .} °+: ti 7.-,r PRUJ+OSED'LANDSCAPING / i •♦'. r •slb_ ., .f!9 MATCH EXISIMG) / f / I'_ i, • X /'• .' '/�PROPOSLD 15' X I X.• ✓\ PROPOSED a'-O- INCH ,P./.7., r% to' SALOON PC5 I j •+' ✓' +:, '/ •'.'' .�' ...\ • CHAIN UNK FENCE_M/ /I ` CONC, EQUIPMENT ,I ♦ T 7 ''+'' ,K_ 7 STRANDS 0► t1AA Q/,%♦'/!. 1M0. / , • • ' / I YB. �\ WINE. / IQ. 0■f �' ` EXISTTNG ,. • O * \+ ,N,;/Sr' /! . / 4.7,♦ !• UMUCRGROUND ,re •♦ , /// ♦ I / PRQPOSEO A r. / 3 7 iL P�Qf. ;r: ' Z \\ //) CTtIVEI PAVING : � / .'•�"' r - d I''///✓/ INSIDE iCNCEC I • n� �/. '.• . / • ¢ .4 .•'r - * .. \` _ i\ .�/,'• '// I•, 4..,r J'� /I J'�% ! • ',�' Y 3#tw -h '�^I�yryf'•! "t y 1\�' \.4.,.�,,i••// ''•• \•.••• - _ , y 1 r 7!'11 • v`+i *f.y�•Yf'♦1y 1 .. r /'1'..,0`'' •/, I'ti y • •.•,• e t l w,r , T/ No, ♦•I ,�" ',• ''4t : r% . , ,, \ 4' ( �■•,i.� ti'j, 4 ,.i io I t 1 a, a.. t _ •s '; / �; fY• • ,1��,/��i�/ /f' `�rra. .�t. r ';• '7,',4';',''. v' "s• .t:•,. .fy. :,' ,'> , •. . ,.,. ,'•/',,// �/ .'�' ",/ i.E, -" �, .• Li^"'' vY 1, .'r'� .�.`,qa r• '°a► ,.-1 / . .y3 • •Yi• //! �__ /, /♦, e v ,�, i rI � s`q$'�.. �J'.:s� y r •`ni3 i/;7 k "' + •y 4�,r/ /!f • '•/ //';; /•,,,, f/ /,// �V.."I4'.r•% w yy�_ .fv � ` Lt,'�'• * try' .. ,y Pr, ■.{ , 1112,1) (/ I••\ I •. `•, , Yy is'1�-'`•'4� ' 1� 8 ,e 7 f' ' t` /SIC,'-...p iP" co`L, /.' .•:".0,1/// '/ ,• •'' , ' `-=-^� — 1 b .i �" .J• / r `/� .��'I'/r• "Y:,,.!' ,Y / //I,f•/' • 1f' �"_ _ � ' 1 7 t yyr♦ k�,-' ��.� -7' / I / I ,I i� .'it Tt,r ` 7/ / / / ,•,:.�'1 �,�,� '`,, �•-' S OW DIVER.:,If�1 ,. ',.-)4,:/ y ' • .Sr Ce• .5.1C'�'11 _ f y 1XA1 cnr, u I.�( (y� �• f �S �i %,• ',� EXISTING IANWCAPING ;r�, '- yl6. /.yljx R,�cf fi..1.:4/ //;tC/'.i, • ,, ` '}t/ '',./.7'..-, �J`�� `��-_ e GROUNDCOVEp '.1, - ;./il„!4-Nr ...;A.)'�,.'/�Fi ;J'y1�•44)V. ,><`T/ fi st -9.,.: \- �r ` P+ • SALMON PCS — V PT-328-01 . 0 z7Dt NW vmlghn GAZLEY �..«.. 1 16060 SW 85TH AVE suLlr764 PLOWMAN S1t W!.. P ' �/ polio/O.Or 97210 `• TIGARD OR 503 zrf rEOD • ARcHtT cTS pro, }'No.:02-010' ' 'I _ 97224 J_•_._ so 274 7t103 Fait 1, ,P.. ->. Mericom Corp. ; Page 4 Received: 5/14/02 10:30AMk.. • MAY-14-2002 TUE 11 :31 AM GAICL.'1 PLOWMAN ARCHITECT FAX NO . 2747803 . .- 7:1): 04/04 . •:'.`',1''71..:,1, ''''''' . . •, •••,.. . . . ' ' . • ..: '"':1•!,,,, '•.!--K.--k • ' 4„'''.", • . , , , • . .,,,,,4 ,-,•:•;,, 0, ,....... ,•:,4,,,..,..,,tor• . „:,.. , • ••..„„:::;,,!.:.r.!ti4;i„;;.A. ,I i;it 4, -,-;r:,.,:,‘..,,;.:7;,*47-;_f_ . •. .=•,— ••,4:. l':•,•-r, ,4,4*.••7 1:c r ,.,••••••-•-..,',‘' .•' •••••••• • i.,‘;;,,,,,,„ ,_•••••A:r,',,•; ,' ,e:.•;•,..1/ -,"' - , '4.7•.4;•.21., lo,L.'4,•4• :•:..-j. , ,•o, ..•-•,!o-• .• . : :--',.. r i•3,---F.,.z...,,444;•3,4r- T t=•,.r.,, 1 „, . • 7,: '-•,-.•''':‘;;;;„*.**i''- ,:l'AF4''.„„,,' ;',. .' `,..‘,'' '..4.;'• •: .'. „L",:.•'.' .:,ii.,' • .4 ..,,,:..,-,-, ... A.,.:.......„ ,-;-... ;,,, . . . • ,1% 6-',5::*•,., -At, ,...-.5,,,,,,,,i1,,z.14,5 . . , 5 - :Js,:,,,°.::5„4:i..!,,:i:..1.,..t., .-,1..?,55 ?::_r,...•tok. ;,-,,- ovcRALL.,t(cgra –•-• r ...NnososE0 4' ucirrkis ROO•.' • •..:I',,,, .1'..:=7k--'):'".. • ...'.-...iik''• 1",;- 1. .;;.;,?.t., ,,_' . :',.;;-,,,•••••:,..,.• .. • , ; sm.moN rcs pair*. I........41. J li [1 ---pRorosro (4) SALMON PCS *-' • *r• .2" -)1^;,, ,• .;, .v,I, _-...... — ANILAINAS. (2)ANTD4145 OCR szclOk-,..,;',., it'? ' '".';.;•T 7..4,,_ (2) SECTORS TOTAL. ANICNWAS TO ok 14Rtie?:.,..-',:-""' moutnal ON 5'-o- DAVIT Ana, ;.••:‘,1*,,e." ' 1•,.--;- •••:.i■,-;‘• ,I„.,•,.", : '.7."....,; io= ,–. .. . ••-4-.444,' ,. q,.---t•'.14';•!•+,'',.v• ' g•r i••••,'I•':;-: ,ivi,o!...111 • ..r;y..1,•,„;,,44;•.;,•:•,,,,: . , •-• •-•.1".;'-';',i;•-•'.'f'.`. "'''''4541 43';:L'''' ' 1,' . ,,,:, '.4.,•,,,F-;."',' .,...-0;:', ;..''. .. :. .': .■•..,-'=-40,1.,,r1;:.' ,. ",- .4','",•- • ,.,„ , , . , .,.,-.-., 1.:•1,41$0,:z--;: •~ ,..--,.;.=,,t, ,•• . , ,.....:-..„.s.:mtv...0“..,,• •..,,...4,, - ..,, ' ' ''''• • •. • ••. ,.-`•.••rv.:.;•Aft , :,,,,•,--, . • ,'i ''..T...'„.i--.-,k,n-% • •••' ,;,." - -- -- NoN 100-o'Him • ,, , - - , ,,.. , - • NMI MONOPOLE '., :r. '1.?,i,II,V:-..?,,- • ;,l'ia• .; i. I • ' - '‘. ' .'- 4.`,,,,is...4„:....,..:,4, ',..., ., :.7:- ....;i..:'."=, . ' • "'"•• ' '7'404' 1.'...CIAlkti7;f ' ',"..4. . ' - --'-'"==''•••••1%:•'*•='•'" 1,---,i,'.`;''.' P4,'C'•h=yr''=.1 t -q.:'"",#?"' .4"-'-.:. .,. .,... . ••+ *:,",,!'''',..;,;'''• . '• otflta:nir• ,.''''='-e'r,V.•'''1.1'' R '--:":"''-'".•••.`' ' '-' , . - =, •. „ . _I .. • -' 'i' 'r. ':0•(‘"•'.''''..`r.,4,-"kw0 , .• : '• .,,, . 8 .1 .. . . , ,f - --,...,':.4,. ..L...i.v:t,i..1-.-:,:-',,--..., Y:',°/..-...• ' — 0 ., •,, — ,,,r'.i...;,-44•411ft„,', ‘:.w: .''.. ' ',.•!. - ..'- -,•,,,---„•,-' '4:yr-.4', '•;•'.•=4.:,.., 1.,:!•teill:'-44.,,,,P-f • •,"..,.:• ! -r ..'' "'A.24.,...••••• ,"c....4.7'4,.." i...f.'•••`•,=:‘,..'r=r4' ''''. 'k . • . . . ,.. ' .. •=•' ! ' ''1,..c1;'„,.'-It,.?:=7ii; '' '' "'''`''''''''''''-' • , • = ,-= - ,-:„....,•■•...,,,,,,,,ft.„.‘it....,=-,=.,,- t,.!•1!-.tt.'N.,,..„4,.. • ,,r,,,,g, , 7,-*"1-;..,•". ',,r ,,,,,a, • ' ,:4'... • ''':,;::-;'*!'rl Z'..t‘"'4''e‘e:"'..47''.... ..'"'7,'',":1,14".•--' ) ''. f' ''' '''';1'-:1.:F":1P:.■";:, - . . :._: ,;,!,••,.:.,-...*,4„.0.• ,t4;',.",;.., ,..,..,,../...-;*ki • . _ ,...•: •...':: ,...44:.1;':, SALMON no--',.-'55:5 -,,,--,4t5i,...'- IWPCMCD ''-'4 7.•":''..t4,•.:'"!,; h•'"- rROposEo E' woo CHAIN------- . COUIPMCNT CANAMTS ...., ,, !cm (C!' ,i'„, -''•:`,,i,i;P::.:-'",Y1 UNK FENCE Vi/ 3 STRANDS - 4t....t.,24'‘. OF%NW°WIRE •Atopo$L0 &MOP Pal.': '',..)-r..4,14:;'' *r---;;;'' :-14'.••4;14‘. k,- mire mote sii%slum« : •.,; 0,,r,...-,r p; • ,'. '•, 'It'.„ I--L- H-FROAS IMMO i-,.. .., • . :,1",s'..:;t4'•.,•., ' •; ,4-,,;": ''. .,, . " ■.• ' .,, . : . S . .,. . .. .' -. ',-,`^-',"•:•.1;•''• ' —'.•;'-'4 ..., • . i• ' • • NOTE. _IN FORCCRONNO of .. • '. . LEASE AREA NOT SHOWN FOR MARIN. • , - -• . :-• .. . . ... . . . , .,. .. _,,•3:' .:1'1,...sit-i.i454!=f4=J7=','''''' .' 7.1 tr • 1,1?'="''''.., ..•• • ''.''.' /'4::'‘'''''''R•`.4141.1.-...'.-1.4-ixt ,:•!-• .;.".• . 4.:::,::a!V,r'''.);;;Aiii4J,', ? ',.. '•;,":4* -,4 ! •••:' -, - EAST ELEVATION . . ., ,,, :—:.,?:-r...1.,,,...1.,c,:.4. :: .- -• .:';',..ts., — ,• , -. ,...-,,:,,:4,,,,„•,:.....t.J.,,, ,. . . ,•,.;.,,T 1" = 20' . .,. S. . ..• : , . -,,,,,....,4 '..i..1„:•A,..,.- ' ',--" 1 . , .....,,:,...„.„.„,„„.„.0..... . . •., ...., , . ?•,. ,. _ . y . .r(1.7w,,.,.,s.. t,-a SALMON PCS v GAzLEY .. . . PT-328-01 2701 NW Vumzhn '.` Smite 754 L. ',-,,Ple.7,3213-01:q ..- . 16060 SW 85TH AVE Purilati.Or.972)0 PUMMAN Sit°:".., 4, 1 . • - 503 274 7000 P1.64 ,''..-. ".1.,?."081. ,..r,r;Is'" TIGARD, OR 97224 503 274 7803 Fax , I ,,S1 K. 2 , - __ ......_ _ _. :. .... , MERICOM' C O R P O R A T I O N May 3, 2002 RE: City of Tigard, Oregon; collocation information request Dear Sir or Madam: Pursuant to the requirements of 18.798.080, Salmon PCS, LLC D.B.A Cingular Wireless is hereby providing you with notice of our intent to meet with representatives of the City of Tigard in a pre-application conference to discuss the location of a new free-standing wireless communication facility that would be located at 16060 SW 85th Avenue, Tigard, Oregon. In general, we plan to construct a mono-pole of 100 feet in height for the purpose of providing PCS service. Please inform us whether your company has any existing or pending wireless facilities located within one- thousand feet of the proposed facility, that may be available for possible collocation opportunities. Please provide us with this information within 10 business days after the date of this letter. Your cooperation is appreciated. Please feel free to contact me with any questions you may have. Thank you for your attention to this matter. Sincerely, MERICOM CORPORATION Edward (Ed) F. Fournier Senior Project Manager Direct Line: 503/303-3012 E-Mail: Ed.Fournier @Mericom.com 25977 SW CANYON CREEK ROAD, SUITE E, WILSONVILLE, OREGON 97070, U.S.A. TELEPHONE: (503) 303-3000 / FAX: (503) 303-3001 I. . •os a ervuce I. c a ervuce CERTIFIED MAIL =IPT - CE ED MAIL RECEIPT (Domestic Mail Only. rsurance Coverage Provided) (Dc Mail Only: No Insurance Coverage Provided) Ln 11') rU 0 D co Postage 9�` Postage ��- k 9ti O1 U I •, O, 0- Certified Fee . /O (....C.?MAY c) Er Certified Fee _ O Return Receipt Fee Po r l�1 Endorsement Receipt Fee `•' epi, t3 �te 'rk (Endorsement Required) 1 (Endorsement quire , D Restricted Delivery Fee D Restricted Delivery Fee ° (Endorsement Required) LISPS D (Endorsement Required) ° Total Postage&Fees $ S-S ° Total Postage&Fees , USP ' nJ fU Li, Re 'wt's Name Plea a Print C:ar )(T.be completed by mailer) Ui cipient's N m8 pang Clearly)(To be completed by mailer) ° A No.;o Bo o [� [ D S r A^pt o or P ox No. D StI /Wm;. .• �1 /.��t/� D 4 _ I D C ((y/l S ante,, 1• • 0 L ° r ,to q A Ai PS Form 3800,February 2000 See Reverse for Instructions PS Form 3800,February 2000 See Reverse for Instruction U.S. Postal Service U.S. Postal Service CERTIFIED MAIL RECEIPT CERTIFIED MAIL RECEIPT (Domestic Mail Only; No Insurance Coverage Provided) (Domestic Mail Only; No Insurance Coverage Provided) R! ca D D = = � ,.� /� cc Postage SQI�IVI(t� ct3 Postage , if) ttl a- n_i Certified Fee rl�.` 09 0- Certified Fee �� 9j 0 MI Return Receipt Fee �� Ay 3 Post Return Receipt Fee P Her 1� - (Endorsement Required) v -' (Endorsement Required) �� .V rl '°f(( D Restricted Delivery Fee �i D Restricted Delivery Fee s O� D (Endorsement Required) D (Endorsement Required) s D Total Postage&Fees M PS D Total Postage&Fees . EE RJ RI 1..n Re ipl is Name (PI ase tint C arty (To be completed by mailer) l�) Rrent s Nam (Please Print Cle l)( be corn cad y alter) ° A�• =r PQ l j o x Y f /^ M � -airy- A N• P O B N c8.---D 1/tip/ (�[{ Cf� /!/ 1�-- I_ ,,,Ill A`C state, +P I, 1 �. '�1�J 1� N C/t9 r to f/, I de , ir� PS Form 3800,February 2000 See Reverse for Instructions PS Form 3800,February 2000 See Reverse for Instruction U.S. Postal Service U.S. Postal Service CERTIFIED MAIL RECEIPT CERTIFIED MAIL RECEIPT (Domestic Mail Only: No Insurance Coverage Provided) (Domestic Mail Only: No Insurance Coverage Provided) P- rq MI D — D UR �- _ 9� Postage .C�� 9 9�Q ri) Postage $ VS` •,. D EU U-I Ln J 0 0' 0- Certified Fee 11� Certified Fee •- _ s.t //�� uv 3:; - Via Return Receipt Fee _tJ ip\ He Return Receipt Fee d Fostma, Ui (Endorsement Required) , u 1 (Endorsement Required) 1-R r-R He D Restricted Delivery Fee 0 Restricted Delivery Fee USCs ° (Endorsement Required) ° (Endorsement Required) LISPS 0 Total Postage&Fees IIMMI D Total Postage&Fees tl.l r t.rl Reci is erne (ease Print featly)(T be completed by mailer) R Ci ienYS ame (Pleas tint Clear/ Ln 0 D (To be corn leted by mailer l V 1 I lm_5 t Sir . PO Box No. — I'�a Street, •t.No.•or PO Bcpc o - / - in 0 9X0 ab PS Form 3800,February 2000 See Reverse for Instructions PS Form 3800,February 2000 rY See;Reverse for Instructions ADDITIONAL DOCUMENTS February 9, 2004 umaiirn*q�up�{1 VA, CITY OF TIGARD Steven Topp, AICP OREGON The Alaris Group, LLC 2701 NW Vaughn, Suite 890 Portland, OR 97210 RE: SDR 2002-00010 Cingular (CWS Site) approval extension request Dear Mr. Topp: This letter is in response to your request received on January 28, 2004 for a one-year extension to the approval of the Cingular Wireless Site Development Review approval (Case File SDR 2002-00010). Your request has been approved based on the following findings of fact in consideration of the criteria of Tigard Development Code Section 18.360.030(D). 1. No changes are made on the original site development review plan as approved by the director. The approved plans have not been altered from those that were approved except where required by city staff. 2. The applicant can show intent of initiating construction on the site within the one year extension period; and According to the applicant, the delay was due to economic factors, and construction is expected to begin at the beginning of 2004. 3. There have been no changes to the applicable Comprehensive Plan policies and ordinance provisions on which the approval was based. There have been no changes to the applicable Comprehensive Plan policies and ordinances that would affect this approval. Based on the above findings, the case will now expire February 23, 2005 If you have any questions, call me at (503)639-4171 ext. 2428. Sinc rely, Morgan Tracy, AICP Associate Planner 13125 SW Hall Blvd., Tigard, OR 97223 (503)639-4171 TDD (503)684-2772 • 1 ill .N t IFiD RECEIVED JAN 2 8 2004 GlresUP,,wLLC CITY OF TIGARD January 27,2004 PLANNING/ENGINEERING Dick Bewersdorff Planning Manager City of Tigard 13125 SW Hall Blvd. Tigard, OR 97223 Re: Request for one-year extension of zoning approval SDR2002-00010. Dear Mr. Bewersdorff; On behalf of Cingular Wireless and Salmon PCS, I would like to request a one-year extension to the current zoning permit referenced above. The current expiration date of this permit is 2/23/04. The new expiration date with the one-year extension would be 2/23/05. This extension is requested due to a delay in deployment efforts drought the Portland market. Due primarily to economic concerns,budgeting of the project was frozen until the end of 2003. Deployment efforts are anticipated to begin again—and some initial activity is already occurring—in February of this year. This extension would allow us to prepare and submit for building permit in a timely manner, without rushing to get it accomplished by the current expiration date. In addition,it is warranted that no changes have been made to the site plan as approved and that there have been no changes,of which I am aware, to the development code on which the original approval was based. Please feel free to contact me directly with any further questions or concerns related to this request. Thank you. c 10, Steven W. Topp,AICP Zoning Manager 503.708.7337 stopp@thealarisgroup.com The Alaris Group-Portland An approved Vendor for Cingular Wireless/Salmon PCS 27011 NW Vaughn—Suite 890 Portland, OR 97210 (503)223-1063 Facsimile PT328 Extension Request.doc 1/27/2004 6:57 PM CITY OF TIGARD 1/28/2004 13125 SW Hall Blvd. 9:31:35AM Tigard,Oregon 97223 1 { (503) 639-4171 Receipt #: 27200400000000000312 Date: 01/28/2004 Line Items: Case No Tran Code Description Revenue Account No Amount Paid SDR2002-00010 [LANDUS]Approved Extension 100-0000-438000 205.00 Line Item Total: $205.00 Payments: Method Payer User ID Acct./Check Approval No. How Received Amount Paid CreditCard STEVEN W TOPP CAC 028460 In Person 205.00 Payment Total: $205.00 Page 1 of 1 cReceipt.rpt