Loading...
SDR2003-00008 SSEIIId .WWa.L11NIITAI 80000ioozuas NOTICE OF TYPE II DECISION A 4= SITE DEVELOPMENT REVIEW (SDR) 2003-00008 CITY OF TIGARD MINUTEMAN PRESS Community'Development gulping A Better Community 120 DAYS = 2/5/2004 SECTION I. APPLICATION SUMMARY FILE NAME: MINUTEMAN PRESS CASE NO.: Site Development Review (SDR) SDR2003-00008 PROPOSAL: The applicant is requesting Site Development Review approval to construct a 7,250 square foot commercial office building and associated site improvements. A 1,673 square foot residence currently occupies the site and is proposed to be removed. APPLICANT: Bob Davidson OWNER: John & Marjorie Joens Minuteman Press PMB 130 14285 SW Pacific Highway 944 Vetrans Way, #105 Tigard, OR 97224 Redmond, OR 97756 APPLICANT'S Rory Antis REP.: Gray Purcell, Inc. PO Box 23516 Portland, OR 97281-3516 LOCATION: 7545 SW Hermoso Way; WCTM 2S101AB, Tax Lot 1501. ZONE: MUE; Mixed Use Employment. The MUE zoning district is designed to apply to a majority of the land within the Tigard Triangle, a regional mixed-use employment district bounded by Pacific Highway (HWY. 99), Highway 217 and 1-5. This zoning district permits a wide range of uses including major retail goods and services, business/professional offices, civic uses and housing; the latter includes multi-family housing at a maximum density of 25 units/acre, equivalent to the R-25 zoning district. APPLICABLE REVIEW Community Development Code Chapters 18.360, 18.390, 18.520, CRITERIA: 18.620, 18.705, 18.725, 18.745, 18.755, 18.765, 18.780, 18.790, 18.795 and 18.810. SECTION II. DECISION Notice is hereby given that the City of Tigard Community Development Director's designee has APPROVED the above request subject to certain conditions of approval. The findings and conclusions on which the decision is based are noted in Section VI. NOTICE OF TYPE II DECISION SDR2003-00008/MINUTEMAN PRESS PAGE 1 OF 28 CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL THE FOLLOWING CONDITIONS SHALL BE SATISFIED PRIOR TO THE ISSUANCE OF SITE/BUILDING PERMITS: emit evidence of complying with the following conditions to the—Planning Division. Staff contact: Mathew Scheidegger at 503-639-4171, ext. 2437. 1. Provide a plan showing the proposed building to be setback from SW Hermoso Way no greater than 10 feet and construct accordingly. 2. Provide a plan showing the front facade to include a minimum of 50 percent ground floor windows, display areas, or doorway openings and construct accordingly. 3. Submit information indicating that the Red Maples to be planted within the front yard setback will be a minimum of three and a half inch caliper and plant accordingly. 4. Provide sign dimensions,_plans, and a City of Tigard sign application to the Planning Technicians at the planning counter located in City Hall, for the proposed wall sign. 5. The applicant's engineer shall provide a pre-construction sight distance certification and/or correct existing deficiencies. 6. Provide a plan showing the proposed parking lot with a minimum of 19 parking stalls and construct accordingly. 7. Prior to site work, the applicant must install all tree protection measures and contact the City's Forester and a member of the Planning Staff for sign-off. Submit to the Engineering Department (Kim McMillan, 639-4171, ext. 2642) for review and approval: 8. Prior to issuance of a site permit, a Public Facility Improvement (PFI) permit is required for this project to cover the half-street improvements in Hermoso Way and any other work in the public right-of-way (ROW). Eight (8) sets of detailed public improvement plans shall be submitted for review to the Engineering Department. NOTE: these plans are in addition to any drawings required by the Building Division and should only include sheets r- evant to public improvements. Public Facility Improvement (PFI) permit plans shall conform to City of Tigard Public Improvement Design Standards, which are available at City Hall and the City's web page (www.ci.tigard.or.us). 9. The PFI permit plan submittal shall include the exact legal name, address and telephone number of the individual or corporate entity who will be designated as the "Permittee", and who will provide the financial assurance for the public improvements. For example, specify if the entity is a corporation, limited partnership, LLC, etc. Also specify the state within which the entity is incorporated and provide the name of the corporate contact person. Failure to provide accurate information to the Engineering Department will delay processing of project documents. 10. The applicant shall provide-a construction vehicle access and parking plan for approval by the City Engineer. The purpose of this plan is for parking and traffic control during the public improvement construction phase. All construction vehicle parking shall be provided on-site. No construction vehicles or equipment will be permitted to park on the adjoining residential public streets. Construction vehicles include the vehicles of any contractor or subcontractor involved in the construction of site improvements or buildings proposed by this application, and shall include the vehicles of all suppliers and employees associated with the project. 11. Prior to issuance of the Site Permit, the-applicant shall pay an addressing fee in the amount of$50.00. (STAFF CONTACT:-Shirley Treat, Engineering). 12. Additional right-of-way shall be dedicated to the Public along the frontage of SW Hermoso Way to increase the right-of-way to 30 feet from the centerline. The description shall be tied to the existing right-of-way centerline. The dedication document shall be on City forms. Instructions are available from the Engineering Department. NOTICE OF TYPE II DECISION SDR2003-00008/MINUTEMAN PRESS PAGE 2 OF 28 13. The applicant shall submit construction plans to the Engineering Department as a part of the Public Facility Improvement permit, which indicate that they will construct a half-street improvement along the frontage of SW Hermoso Way. The improvements adjacent to this site shall include: A. City standard pavement section for a local street from curb to centerline equal to 18 feet; B. pavement tapers needed to tie the new improvement back into the existing edge of pavement shall be built beyond the site frontage; C. concrete curb, or curb and gutter as needed; D. storm drainage, including any off-site storm drainage necessary to convey surface and/or subsurface runoff; E. 6 foot concrete sidewalk with a planter strip; F. street trees in the planter strip spaced per TDC requirements; G. street striping; H. streetlight layout by applicant's engineer, to be approved by City Engineer; I. underground utilities; J. street signs (if applicable); K. driveway apron Of applicable); and L. adjustments in vertical and/or horizontal alignment to construct SW Hermoso Way in a safe manner, as approved by the Engineering Department. 14. A profile of Hermoso Way shall be required, extending 300 feet either side of the subject site showing the existing grade and proposed future grade. 15. The applicant shall obtain approval from the Tualatin Valley Water District (TVWD) for the proposed water connection prior to issuance of the City's Public Facility Improvement permit. 16. The applicant shall provide an on-site water quality facility as required by Clean Water Services Design and Construction Standards (adopted by Resolution and Order No. 00-7). Final plans and calculations shall be submitted to the Engineering Department (Kim McMillan) for review and approval prior to issuance of the site permit. In addition, a proposed maintenance plan shall be submitted along with the plans and calculations for review and approval. 17. The applicant's water quality/quantity facility shall include design of the 2, 10 and 25 year storms. The plans shall also include the engineer's proposed revisions to the outfall, as outlined in his correspondence dated 10/04/03. 18. An erosion control plan shall be provided as part of the Public Facility Improvement (PFI) permit drawings. The plan shall conform to the "Erosion Prevention and Sediment Control Design and Planning Manual, February 2003 edition." 19. Prior to issuance of the site permit, the applicant shall pay the current assessment for this site as it pertains to Sewer Reimbursement District No. 15. STAFF CONTACT: Greg Berry, Utility Engineer, (503) 639-4171, ext. 2468. 20. The applicant's PFI submittal shall include the extension of the public storm sewer in Hermoso Way. THE FOLLOWING CONDITIONS SHALL BE SATISFIED PRIOR TO A FINAL BUILDING INSPECTION: Submit to the Planning Department (Mathew Scheidegger, 639-4171,ext. 2437) for review and approval: 21. Provide information regarding the size of the fence and type of landscaping to be used to screen the proposed refuse container. 22. Provide documentation that the franchise hauler for the area is satisfied that the design of the refuse container area is compatible with waste pick up practices. NOTICE OF TYPE II DECISION SDR2003-00008/MINUTEMAN PRESS PAGE 3 OF 28 23. The applicant is required to provide all internal parking stalls along the proposed sidewalk with wheel stops. 24. Provide a 4-stall bicycle rack within 50 feet of the west entrance. 25. Provide directional signs back to the required bicycle rack. 26. Submit details of the bicycle rack to be used. 27. Provide information verifying that the proposed shrubbery located on the southern property line will not grow within the required visual clearance triangle area or trim according to the standard. 28. Submit a detailed lighting plan to the Tigard Police Department and the Tigard Planning Department for review. 29. Provide a tree mitigation plan for 134-inches and implement accordingly. Submit to the Engineering Department (Kim McMillan, 639-4171, ext. 2642) for review and approval: 30. The applicant's engineer shall provide a post construction sight distance certification and/or correct existing deficiencies. 31. Prior to a final building inspection, the applicant shall complete the required public improvements, obtain conditional acceptance from the City, and provide a one-year maintenance assurance for said improvements. 32. Prior to a final building inspection, the applicant shall provide the City with as-built drawings of the public improvements as follows: 1) 3 mil mylar, 2) a diskette of the as- builts in "DWG" format, if available; otherwise "DXF" will be acceptable, and 3) the as- built drawings shall be tied to the City's GPS network. The applicant's engineer shall provide the City with an electronic file with points for each structure (manholes, catch basins, water valves, hydrants and other water system features) in the development, and their respective X and Y State Plane Coordinates, referenced to NAD 83 (91). 33. The applicant shall either place the existing overhead utility lines along SW Hermoso Way underground as a part of this project, or they shall pay the fee in-lieu of undergrounding. The fee shall be calculated by the frontage of the site that is parallel to the utility lines and will be $35.00 per lineal foot. If the fee option is chosen, the amount will be $4,375.00 and it shall be paid prior to the final building inspection. 34. To ensure compliance with Clean Water Services design and construction standards, the applicant shall employ the design engineer responsible for the design and specifications of the private water quality facility to perform construction and visual observation of the water quality facility for compliance with the design and specifications. These inspections shall be made at significant stages, and at completion of the construction. Prior to final building inspection, the design engineer shall provide the City of Tigard (Inspection Supervisor) with written confirmation that the water quality facility is in compliance with the design and specifications. Staff Contact: Hap Watkins, Building Division. 35. Thg Trip Generation funds for the intersections of SW 72"d/Dartmouth and SW 68t /Dartmouth must be paid prior to a final building inspection. THIS APPROVAL SHALL BE VALID FOR EIGHTEEN (18) MONTHS FROM THE EFFECTIVE DATE OF THIS DECISION. SECTION III. BACKGROUND INFORMATION Site History: Staff conducted a search of City records for the Tax Map 2S101AB, Tax Lot 1501. Based on this search, no other land-use cases were found. NOTICE OF TYPE II DECISION SDR2003-00008/MINUTEMAN PRESS PAGE 4 OF 28 Vicinity Information: The subject site is located on the west side of SW Hermoso Way. The site is bordered on three sides by property zoned Mixed Use Employment (MUE) and General Commercial (C-G) to the north. The property to the south has recently received site development review approval for a 1,808 square foot law office (SDR2003-00007). Site Information and Proposal Description: The applicant is requesting Site Development Review approval to construct a 7,250 square foot commercial office building and associated site improvements. A 1,673 square foot residence currently occupies the site and is proposed to be removed. SECTION IV. COMMENTS FROM PROPERTY OWNERS WITHIN 500 FEET One neighbor provided comments regarding the proposed subdivision. The concerns of the neighbor are as follows: With the increased traffic on Beveland and the addition of Minuteman Press, the City may want to consider paying for the remaining sidewalk that is needed to help keep these people out of harm's way. RESPONSE: The Minute Man Press site will be required to complete a half-street improvement which will include a sidewalk. However, the City cannot hold applicant's responsible to construct sidewalks along frontages of neighboring properties. Those properties that do not have sidewalks will be required to provide sidewalks at time of development. SECTION V. SUMMARY OF APPLICABLE REVIEW CRITERIA A. Tigard Triangle Design Standards Street Connectivity Site Design Standards Building Design Standards Signs Landscaping and Screening B. Additional Applicable Development Code Standards 18.705 Access Egress and Circulation) 18.725 Environmental Performance Standards) 18.745 Landscaping and Screening) 18.755 Mixed Solid Waste and Recyclable Storage) 18.765 Off-Street parking and loading requirements) 18.780 Signs) 18.790 Tree Removal) 18.795 Visual Clearance) C. Specific DR Approval Criteria 18.360 D. Street and Utility Improvement Standards 18.810 E. Impact Study 18.390 SECTION VI. APPLICABLE DEVELOPMENT CODE STANDARDS A. ZONING DISTRICT Commercial Zoning District: Section 18.520.020 Lists the description of the Commercial Zoning Districts. The site is located in the MUE zoning district: Mixed-Use Employment. NOTICE OF TYPE II DECISION SDR2003-00008/MINUTEMAN PRESS PAGE 5 OF 28 • Development Standards: Section 18.520.040.B States that Development standards in Commercial Zoning Districts are contained in Table 18.520.2 below: TABLE 18.520.2 DEVELOPMENT STANDARDS IN COMMERCIAL ZONES STANDARD MUE Proposed Minimum Lot Size None 18,182 sq.ft. Minimum Lot Width 50 ft. 125 ft. Minimum Setbacks -Front yard Oft[11] 15 ft. -Side facing street on corner&through lots[1] - - -Side yard 0/20 ft[8] 5 ft. --Rear yard 0/20 ft[8] 95 ft. -Distance between front of garage&property line abutting a public or private street. - - Minimum Building Height N/A N/A Maximum Height 45 ft 40 ft. Maximum Site Coverage[2] 85% 68% Minimum Landscape Requirement 15% 31.91% Minimum FAR .40 .39 Minimum Residential Density[4][5][6] N/A N/A Maximum Residential Density N/A N/A 1]The provisions of Chapter 18.795(Vision Clearance)must be satisfied. [2]Includes all buildings and impervious surfaces. [4]Notwithstanding the requirements of Section 18.715.020,minimum and maximum density shall be determined for residential only projects using the number of residential units per acre shown in the above table. The provisions for density transfer described in Section 18.715.030.B apply, using the minimum and maximum density shown in the above table.Any mixed-use or commercial only development does not have a minimum density requirement. [5]For purposes of determining floor area ratio and residential densities,the net development area shall be uses to establish the lot area,determined per Section 18.715.020.A [6] Adjustments to minimum density in the Washington Square Regional center area subject to the standards set forth in Section 18.630.020.E. [8]No setback shall be required except 20 feet shall be required where the zone abuts a residential zoning district. [11]There shall be no minimum front yard setback requirement; however,conditions in Chapters 18.745 and 18.795 must be met. As demonstrated in the table above, the applicant's plans comply with the dimensional standards of the MUE zone. FINDING: Based on the analysis above, the Development Standards criteria have been satisfied. A. TRIANGLE DESIGN STANDARDS (18.620): Design standards for public street improvements and for new development and renovation projects have been prepared for the Tigard Triangle. These design standards address several important guiding principals adopted for the Tigard Triangle, including creating a high-quality mixed use employment area, providing a convenient pedestrian and bikeway system within the Triangle, and utilizing streetscape to create a high quality image for the area. All new developments are expected to contribute to the character and quality of the area. In addition to meeting the design standards described below and other development standards required by the Development and Building Codes, developments will be required to dedicate and improve public streets, connect to public facilities such as sanitary sewer, water and storm drainage, and participate in funding future transportation and public improvement projects necessary within the Tigard Triangle. The following design standards apply to all development located within the Tigard Triangle. If a standard found in this section conflicts with another standard in the Development Code, standards in this section shall govern. NOTICE OF TYPE II DECISION SDR2003-00008/MINUTEMAN PRESS PAGE 6 OF 28 The criteria may be adjusted if the adjustment approval criteria, which are found in Section 18.620.090.C.1-4, have been met. The criteria provides that an adjustment may be ranted if granting the adjustment will continue to meet the purpose of the standards) to be modified in an acceptable alternative manner; and the proposal will not significant) detract from the livability or appearance of an area and the proposal will be consistent with the desired character of the area; and if more than one adjustment is being requested, the cumulative effect of the adjustments as well as each individual adjustment results in a project which is still consistent with the overall purpose, goals and standards of the zone; and granting the adjustment is the minimum necessary to allow the ro osed use of the site; and any impacts resulting from the adjustment are mitigated to the extent practicable. Street Connectivity: All development must demonstrate how one (1) of the following standard options will be met. Variance of these standards may be approved per the requirements of Chapter 18.134 where topography, barriers such as railroads or freeways, or environmental constraints such as major streams and rivers prevent street extensions and connections. Design Option: a. Local street spacing shall provide public street connections at intervals of no more than 660 feet; b. Bike and pedestrian connections on public easements or right-of-way shall be provided at intervals of no more than 330 feet. Performance Option: a. Local street spacing shall occur at intervals of no less than eight (8) street intersections per mile; b. The shortest vehicle trip over public streets from a local origin to a collector or greater facility is no more than twice the straight-line distance; c. The shortest pedestrian trip on public right-of-way from a local origin to a collector or greater facility is no more than one and one-half the straight-line distance. There are no opportunities for additional street intersections with this proposal. The project lies directly between two intersections that are approximately 340 feet apart. The shortest vehicle and pedestrian trip to SW 72nd Avenue is approximately 860 feet. The straight-line distance to SW 72nd Avenue is approximately 760 feet. Therefore, the standard is satisfied. Site Design Standards: All development must meet the following site design standards. If a parcel is one (1) acre or larger a phased development plan must be approved demonstrating how these standards for the overall parcel can be met. Variance to these standards may be granted if the criteria found in Section 18.370.010C2 (Criteria for Granting a Variance) is satisfied. The subject site is less than one acre in size and the applicant has not proposed to develop the site in phases. Therefore, this standard does not apply. Building Placement On Major And Minor Arterials And The Street: Buildings shall occupy a minimum of 50 percent of all street frontages along Major and Minor Arterial Streets. Buildings shall be located at public street intersections on Major and Minor Arterial Streets. The subject site fronts on SW Hermoso Way, a local street. Therefore, this standard does not apply. Building Setback: The minimum building setback from public street rights-of-way or dedicated wetlands/buffers and other environmental features, shall be 0 feet; the maximum building setback shall be 10 feet. The applicant shows the proposed building to have a 15-foot front yard setback from SW Hermoso Way. The above standard requires a maximum setback of 10 feet. Therefore, the applicant is required to provide a plan showing the proposed building to setback from SW Hermoso Way no greater than 10 feet and construct accordingly. NOTICE OF TYPE II DECISION SDR2003-00008/MINUTEMAN PRESS PAGE 7 OF 28 Front Yard Setback Design: Landscaping, an arcade, or a hard-surfaced expansion of the pedestrian path must be provided' between a structure and a public street or accessway. If a building abuts more than one (1) street, the required improvements shall be provided on all streets. Landscaping shall be developed to an L-1 standard on public streets and an L-2 standard on accessways. Hard-surfaced areas shall be constructed with scored concrete or modular paving materials. Benches and other street furnishings are encouraged. These areas shall contribute to the minimum landscaping requirement per Section 18.620.070. The landscape plan indicates that a combination of landscaping and a concrete walk will be located between the building and SW Hermoso Way. The proposed landscaping consists of four Red Maple trees, a combination of low lying shrubs, and grass for ground cover. The proposed landscaping meets the L-1 landscaping requirement; however, Staff cannot confirm that the Red Maples will be planted at a minimum of three and a half inch caliper. Therefore, the applicant will need to submit information indicating that the Red Maples to be planted within the front yard setback will be a minimum of three and a half inch caliper. Walkway Connection To Building Entrances: A walkway connection is required between the building's entrance and the public street or accessway providing access to the property. This walkway must be at least six (6) feet wide and be paved with scored concrete or modular paving materials. Building entrances at a corner near a public street intersection are encouraged. These areas shall contribute to the minimum landscaping requirement per Section 18.620.070. The applicant's plan shows an 8-foot-wide sidewalk will be provided from the east entrance to SW Hermoso Way. Therefore, this criterion has been satisfied. Parking Location And Landscape Design: Parking for buildings or phases adjacent to public street rights-of-way must be located to the side or rear of newly constructed buildings. If located on the side, parking is limited to 50% of the street frontage and must be behind a landscaped area constructed to an L-1 Landscape Standard. The minimum depth of the L-1 landscaped area is five feet or is equal to the building setback, whichever is greater. Interior side and rear yards shall be landscaped to an L-2 Landscape Standard, except where a side yard abuts a public street, where it shall be landscaped to an L-1 Landscape Standard. The building is oriented to the front of the lot abutting SW Hermoso Way. The parking lot is located on the west side of the building which is the rear of the proposed building. The parking area occupies a total of 19 percent of the street frontage and is screened with a landscape area equal to the L-1 landscaping standard. Therefore, this standard has been met. Building Design Standards: All non-residential buildings shall comply with the following design standards. Variance to these standards may be granted if the criteria found in Section 18.370.010 (Criteria for Granting a Variance) is satisfied. Ground Floor Windows: All street-facing elevations within the Building Setback (0 to 10 feet) along public streets shall include a minimum of 50 percent of the ground floor wall area with windows, display areas or doorway openings. The ground floor wall area shall be measured from three (3) feet above grade to nine (9) feet above grade the entire width of the street-facing elevation. The ground floor window requirement shall be met within the ground floor wall area and for glass doorway openings to ground level. Up to 50 percent of the ground floor window requirement may be met on an adjoining elevation as long as all of the requirement is located at a building corner. According to the standard above, the building must have at a minimum, 50 percent of the ground floor wall area windows or display areas or doorway openings within the 0-10 foot setback. The applicant has indicated that 31% of the front façade is windows and entrances. Therefore, the applicant must provide and construct a plan showing the front façade to include a minimum of 50 percent ground floor windows, display areas, or doorway openings. NOTICE OF TYPE II DECISION SDR2003-00008/MINUTEMAN PRESS PAGE 8 OF 28 Building Facades: Facades that face a public street shall extend no more than 50 feet without providing at least one (1) of the following features: (a) a variation in building materials; (b) a building off-set of at least 1-foot; (c) a wall area that is entirely separated from other wall areas by a projection, such as an arcade; or (d) by another design features that reflect the buildings structural system. No building facade shall extend for more than 300 feet without a pedestrian connection between or through the building. The east façade facing SW Hermoso Way is approximately 80 feet in length, which requires one architectural feature according to the standard above. The main entrance will be used as the building off-set. Therefore, this standard has been satisfied. Weather Protection: Weather protection for pedestrians, such as awnings, canopies, and arcades, shall be provided at building entrances. Weather protection is encouraged along building frontages abutting a public sidewalk or a hard-surfaced expansion of a sidewalk, and along building frontages between a building entrance and a public street or accessway. Awnings and canopies shall not be backlit. The plans show the main entrance as well as the secondary entrance at the west end of the building to be covered. Therefore, this standard is satisfied. Building Materials: Plain concrete block, plain concrete, corrugated metal, plywood, sheet pressboard or vinyl siding may not be used as exterior finish materials. Foundation material may be plain concrete or plain concrete block where the foundation material is not revealed for more than 2 feet. The exterior of the building will be a combination of lap siding and brick. No plain concrete walls have been proposed. Therefore, this standard has been satisfied. Roofs And Roof Lines: Except in the case of a building entrance feature, roofs shall be designed as an extension of the primary materials used for the building and should respect the building's structural system and architectural style. False fronts and false roofs are not permitted. The proposed building does not have a false front or false roof, the applicant is proposing a combination of roof shapes including gables and hips, which will respect the building's architectural style. Roof-Mounted Equipment: All roof-mounted equipment must be screened from view from adjacent public streets. Satellite dishes and other communication equipment must be set back or positioned on a roof so that exposure from adjacent public streets is minimized. Solar heating panels are exempt from this standard. No roof-mounted equipment is proposed. Therefore, this standard does not apply. Signs: In addition to the requirements of Chapter 18.780 of the Development Code, the following standards shall be met: Zoning District Regulations: Non-residential development within the MUE zone shall meet the sign requirements of the C-P zone (18.780.130.D). Sign Area Limits: The maximum sign area limits found in Section 18.780.130 shall not be exceeded. No area limit increases will be permitted within the Tigard Triangle. Height Limits: The maximum height limit for all signs except wall signs shall be 10 feet. Wall signs shall not extend above the roofline of the wall on which the sign is located. No height increases will be permitted within the Tigard Triangle. NOTICE OF TYPE II DECISION SDR2003-00008/MINUTEMAN PRESS PAGE 9 OF 28 Sign Location: Freestanding signs within the Tigard Triangle shall not be permitted within required L-1 landscape areas. The applicant indicates in the narrative that a wall sign will meet the requirements of the code. However, no dimensions or plans have been submitted regarding the proposed sign. Therefore, the applicant is required to provide sign dimensions, plans, and a City of Tigard sign application to the Planning Technicians at the planning counter located in City Hall. Landscaping and Screening: Two (2) levels of landscaping and screening standards are applicable to the Tigard Triangle. The locations where the landscaping or screening is required and the depth of the landscaping or screening are defined in other sub-sections of this section. These standards are minimum requirements. Higher standards may be substituted as long as all height limitations are met. L-1 (Low Screen): For general landscaping of landscaped and screened areas within parking lots, local collectors and local streets, planting standards of Chapter 18.745 Landscaping and Screening, shall apply. The L-1 standard applies to setbacks on major and minor arterials. Where the setback is a minimum of 5 feet between the parking lot and a major or minor arterial, trees shall be planted at 31/2 inch caliper, at a maximum of 28 feet on center. Shrubs shall be of a variety that will provide a 3-foot high screen and 90 percent opacity within one (1) year. Groundcover plants must fully cover the remainder of landscape area within two (2) years. Any tree planted in excess of a 2 inch caliper shall be eligible for full mitigation credit. Parking lot landscaping is addressed later in this decision (Chapter 18.745, Landscaping and Screening). L-2 (General Landscaping): For general landscaping of landscaped and screened areas within parking lots, local collectors and local streets, planting standards of Chapter 18.745 Landscaping and Screening, shall apply. Trees shall be provided at a minimum 21/2 inch caliper, at a maximum spacing of 28 feet. Shrubs shall be of a size and quality to achieve the required landscaping or screening effect within two (2) years. Any tree planted in excess of a 2 inch caliper shall be eligible for full mitigation credit. The proposed site will take access from SW Hermoso Way, a local street. The L-2 landscape standards defer to Chapter 18.745 (Landscaping and Screening) which is discussed further in this decision. FINDING: Based on the analysis above, the Tigard Triangle Design standards have not been fully met. However, if the applicant complies with the conditions below, the Triangle Design standards will be met. CONDITIONS: • Provide a plan showing the proposed building to be setback from SW Hermoso Way no greater than 10 feet and construct accordingly. • Provide a plan showing the front façade to include a minimum of 50 percent ground floor windows, display areas, or doorway openings and construct accordingly. • Submit information indicating that the Red Maples to be planted within the front yard setback will be a minimum of three and a half inch caliper and plant accordingly. • Provide sign dimensions, plans, and a City of Tigard sign application to the Planning Technicians at the planning counter located in City Hall. NOTICE OF TYPE II DECISION SDR2003-00008/MINUTEMAN PRESS PAGE 10 OF 28 B. ADDITIONAL APPLICABLE DEVELOPMENT CODE STANDARDS The Site development Review approval standards require that a development proposal be found to be consistent with the various standards of the Community Development Code. The applicable criteria in this case are Chapters 18.360, 18.370, 18.390, 18.520, 18.705, 18.745, 18.755, 18.765, 18.775, 18.780, 18.790, 18.795, and 18.810. The proposal's consistency with these Code Chapters is reviewed in the following sections. Access, Egress and Circulation (18.705): Access plan: No building or other permit shall be issued until scaled plans are presented and approved as provided by this chapter that show how access, egress and circulation requirements are to be fulfilled. The applicant shall submit a site plan. The Director shall provide the applicant with detailed information about this submission requirement. The applicant has provided plans showing access, egress, and circulation from SW Hermoso Way. Therefore, this standard has been satisfied. Joint access: Owners of two or more uses, structures, or parcels of land may agree to utilize jointly the same access and egress when the combined access and egress of both uses, structures, or parcels of land satisfies the combined requirements as designated in this title, provided: Satisfactory legal evidence shall be presented in the form of deeds, easements, leases or contracts to establish the joint use; and copies of the deeds, easements, leases or contracts are placed on permanent file with the City. Joint access has not been proposed with this application. Therefore, this standard does not apply. Public street access: All vehicular access and egress as required in Sections 18.705.030H and 18.705.0301 shall connect directly with a public or private street approved by the City for public use and shall be maintained at the required standards on a continuous basis. The proposed building is accessible from SW Hermoso Way, which will be maintained as a public street. Therefore, this criterion has been satisfied. Curb cuts: Curb cuts shall be in accordance with Section 18.810.030N: Concrete curbs, curb cuts, wheelchair, bicycle ramps and driveway approaches shall be constructed in accordance with standards specified in this chapter and Section 15.04.080: Concrete curbs and driveway approaches are required; except where no sidewalk is planned, an asphalt approach may be constructed with City Engineer approval and Asphalt and concrete driveway approaches to the property line shall be built to City configuration standards. No driveway approach shall be less than five feet from the side property line projected except in cul-de-sacs, without approval and written permission of the city. The end slopes may encroach within the five foot restricted area. No portion of any driveway approach, including the end slopes, shall be located closer than thirty feet to an intersection street right-of-way line. Commercial or service drives shall not be more than thirty, feet in width and if located on the same lot frontage shall be separated by a minimum length of curb of thirty feet. Each residential driveway shall be not more than twenty-six feet in width including end slopes, and if more than one driveway is to be constructed to serve the same lot, the frontage spacing between such driveways shall be not less than thirty feet measured along the curb line. Joint access driveways shall conform to the appropriate width standard for commercial or residential type usage. The proposed site plan shows the curb cut at the entrance drive to be constructed out of concrete. The curb cut is five feet from the west property line. The curb cut is approximately 135 feet from the intersection of SW Hermoso Way and SW Beveland Street. Therefore, this criterion has been met. NOTICE OF TYPE II DECISION SDR2003-00008/MINUTEMAN PRESS PAGE 11 OF 28 Walkways: On-site pedestrian walkways shall comply with the following standards: Walkways shall extend from the ground floor entrances or from the ground floor landing of stairs, ramps, or elevators of all commercial, institutional, and industrial uses, to the streets which provide the required access and egress. Walkways shall provide convenient connections between buildings in multi-building commercial, institutional, and industrial complexes. Unless impractical, walkways shall be constructed between new and existing developments and neighboring developments; According to the plans submitted, a concrete walkway extends from the entrance on the east and west façade to the sidewalk of SW Hermoso Way. Therefore, this standard has been satisfied. Wherever required walkways cross vehicle access driveways or parking lots, such crossings shall be designed and located for pedestrian safety. Required walkways shall be physically separated from motor vehicle traffic and parking by either a minimum 6-inch vertical separation (curbed) or a minimum 3-foot horizontal separation, except that pedestrian crossings of traffic aisles are permitted for distances no greater than 36 feet if appropriate landscaping, pavement markings, or contrasting pavement materials are used. Walkways shall be a minimum of four feet in width, exclusive of vehicle overhangs and obstructions such as mailboxes, benches, bicycle racks, and sign posts, and shall be in compliance with ADA standards; No walkways have been proposed to cross the access drive or parking lot. Therefore, this standard has been satisfied. Required walkways shall be paved with hard surfaced materials such as concrete, asphalt, stone, brick, etc. Walkways may be required to be lighted and/or signed as needed for safety purposes. Soft-surfaced public use pathways may be provided only if such pathways are provided in addition to required pathways. The plan and narrative depicts the proposed sidewalk to be constructed out of concrete, which meets the standard. Access Management (Section 18.705.030.H) Section 18.765.030.H.1 states that an access report shall be submitted with all new development proposals which verifies design of driveways and streets are safe by meeting adequate stacking needs, sight distance and deceleration standards as set by ODOT, Washington County, the City and AASHTO. The applicant has indicated that visual clearance standards can be met. The applicant did not address sight distance. Therefore, the applicant's engineer shall certify prior to construction that sight distance can be met, and a post construction sight distance certification will be required to ensure that sight distance has been met. Section 18.705.030.H.2 states that driveways shall not be permitted to be placed in the influence area of collector or arterial street intersections. Influence area of intersections is that area where queues of traffic commonly form on approach to an intersection. The minimum driveway setback from a collector or arterial street intersection shall be150 feet, measured from the right-of-way line of the intersecting street to the throat of the proposed driveway. The setback may be greater depending upon the influence area, as determined from City Engineer review of a traffic impact report submitted by the applicant's traffic engineer. In a case where a project has less than 150 feet of street frontage, the applicant must explore any option for shared access with the adjacent parcel. If shared access is not possible or practical, the driveway shall be placed as far from the intersection as possible. The proposed development takes access from SW Hermoso Way, which is considered a local street. Therefore, this standard does not apply. NOTICE OF TYPE II DECISION SDR2003-00008/MINUTEMAN PRESS PAGE 12 OF 28 Section 18.705.030.H.3 and 4 states that the minimum spacing of driveways and streets along a collector shall be 200 feet. The minimum spacing of driveways and streets along an arterial shall be 600 feet. The minimum spacing of local streets along a local street shall be 125 feet. The subject site takes access from SW Hermoso Way, which considered a local street. Therefore, this standard does not apply. Minimum Access Requirements for Commercial and Industrial Use: Section 18.705.030.1 rovides the minimum access requirements for commercial and industrial uses: Table 18.705.3 indicates that the required access width for developments with 0-99 parking spaces is one 30-foot accesses with 24 feet of pavement. Vehicular access shall be provided to commercial or industrial uses, and shall be located to within 50 feet of the primary ground floor entrances; additional requirements for truck traffic may be placed as conditions of site development review. The development has one point of access into the parking lot that is 30 feet in width and provides 25 feet of pavement. Therefore, this standard has been satisfied. FINDING: Based on the analysis above, the Access, Egress and Circulation standards have not been fully met. However, if the applicant complies with the condition listed below, the standards will be fully met. CONDITIONS: The applicant's engineer shall provide a pre-construction sight distance certification and/or correct existing deficiencies. The applicant's engineer shall provide a post construction sight distance certification and/or correct existing deficiencies. ENVIRONMENTAL PERFORMANCE STANDARDS (18.725): Noise: For the purposes of noise regulation, the provisions of Sections 7.40.130 through 7.40.210 of the Tigard Municipal Code shall apply. Visible emissions: Within the commercial zoning districts and the industrial park (IP) zoning district, there shall be no use, operation or activity which results in a stack of other point- source emission from space heating, or the emission of pure uncombined water (steam) which is visible from a property line. Department of Environmental Quality (DEQ) rules for visible emissions (340-21-015 and 340-28-070) apply. Vibration: No vibration other than that caused by highway vehicles, trains and aircraft is permitted in any given zoning district which is discernible without instruments at the property line of the use concerned. Odors: The emission of odorous gases or other matter in such quantities as to be readily detectable at any oint beyond the property line of the use creating the odors is prohibited. DEQ rules for odors (340-028-090) apply. Glare and heat: No direct or sky-reflected glare, whether from floodlights or from high temperature processes such as combustion or welding, which is visible at the lot line shall be permitted and; there shall be no emission or transmission of heat or heated air which is discernible at the lot line of the source; and these regulations shall not apply to signs or floodlights in parking areas or constructing equipment at the time of construction or excavation work otherwise permitted by this title. NOTICE OF TYPE II DECISION SDR2003-00008/MINUTEMAN PRESS PAGE 13 OF 28 Insects and rodents: All materials including wastes shall be stored and all grounds shall be maintained in a manner which will not attract or aid the propagation of insects or rodents or create a health hazard. The proposed use is office, which is an outright permitted use within the MUE zoning district. There is no indication within the application that these standards will not be met. However, ongoing efforts to meet these standards shall be maintained and any violation of these standards will be addressed by the City of Tigard's Code Enforcement Officer. FINDING: Based on the above, there is no evidence the Environmental Performance Standards will not be met. LANDSCAPING AND SCREENING (18.745): Street Trees: Section 18.745.040 states that all development projects fronting on a public street or a private drive more than 100 feet in length shall be required to plant street trees in accordance with Section 18.745.040.0 Section 18.745.040.0 requires that street trees be spaced between 20 and 40 feet apart depending on the size classification of the tree at maturity (small, medium or large). The site plan shows four Columnar Red Maple street trees along SW Hermoso Way. The street trees fall into the large-sized tree category of the standard above and can be spaced no more than 40 feet apart. The site plan shows the trees to be planted at a spacing of 24-30 feet apart. Therefore, this criterion has been satisfied. Buffering and Screening: Section 18.745.080 states that no buffer is required between abutting uses that are of a different type when the uses are separated by a street. No buffer is required between a proposed office use and existing office use. All properties surrounding the subject property are zoned MUE except for the abutting property to the north which is zoned C-G. Therefore, no buffering or screening is required. Screening: Special Provisions: Section 18.745.050.E requires the screening of parking and loading areas. Landscaped parking areas shall include special design features which effectively screen the parking lot areas from view. Planting materials to be installed should achieve a relative balance between low lying and vertical shrubbery and trees. Trees shall be planted in landscaped islands in all parking areas, and shall be equally distributed on the basis of one (1) tree for each seven (7) parking spaces in order to provide a canopy effect. The minimum dimension on the landscape islands shall be three (3) feet wide and the landscaping shall be protected from vehicular damage by some form of wheel guard or curb. The parking area is screened to the north and south with a five to eight foot landscaped area, containing a combination of low lying and vertical shrubbery. The west property line is screened with a 20-foot grass swale and an existing arborvitae hedge. According to the above standard, the applicant is required to plant one parking lot tree for every seven spaces. The parking along the western lot line contains 10 parking stalls. The applicant has proposed to plant three Little Leaf Linden trees at the edge of the grass swale in order to shade the parking area. Therefore, this standard has been satisfied. Screening Of Service Facilities. Except for one-family and two-family dwellings, any refuse container or disposal area and service facilities such as gas meters and air conditioners which would otherwise be visible from a public street, customer or resident parking area, any public facility or any residential area shall be screened from view by placement of a solid wood fence or masonry wall between five and eight feet in height. All refuse materials shall be contained within the screened area; The screening of the proposed refuse container is conditioned below. The plans submitted do not indicate that service facilities will be visible from SW Hermoso Way or the proposed parking lot. Therefore, this standard has been satisfied. NOTICE OF TYPE II DECISION SDR2003-00008/MI N UTE MAN PRESS PAGE 14 OF 28 Screening Of Refuse Containers. Except for one- and two-family dwellings, any refuse container or refuse collection area which would be visible from a public street, parking lot, residential or commercial area_ or any public facility such as a school or park shall be screened or enclosed from view by placement of a solid wood fence, masonry wall or evergreen hedge. All refuse shall be contained within the screened area. The submitted plans show the refuse container area will be located along the northwest property line. The applicant has indicated that the container area will be screened with a fence and landscaping. However, the applicant has not indicated the size of the fence, or the type of landscaping to be used. Therefore, the applicant is required to provide information regarding the size of the fence and type of landscaping to be used to screen the proposed refuse container. FINDING: Based on the analysis above, the landscaping and screening standards have not been met. However, if the applicant complies with the condition listed below, the standards will be fully met. CONDITION: Provide information regarding the size of the fence and type of landscaping to be used to screen the proposed refuse container. MIXED SOLID WASTE AND RECYCLABLES STORAGE (18.755): Chapter 18.155 requires that new construction incorporates tunctional and adequate space for on-site storage and efficient collection of mixed solid waste and source separated Recyclables prior to pick-up and removal by haulers. The applicant must choose one (1) of the following four (4) methods to demonstrate compliance: Minimum Standard Waste Assessment, Comprehensive Recycling Plan, or Franchised Hauler Review and Sign-Off. The applicant will have to submit evidence or a plan which indicates compliance with this section. Regardless of which method chosen, the applicant will have to submit a written sign-off-from the franchise hauler regarding the facility location and compatibility. The proposed development meets the minimum standards method of compliance as specified in Section 18.755.040.C. This method specifies a minimum storage area requirement based on the size and general use category of the new construction. Non-residential office buildings must provide a minimum storage area of 10 square feet, plus 4 square feet/1,000 square feet of gross floor area (GFA). The proposed building contains 7,250 square feet GFA, requiring 29 square feet of storage. The applicant is proposing a refuse container area of 280 square feet. Therefore, this standard has been satisfied. Location Standards. To encourage its use, the storage area for source-separated recyclable shall be co- located with the storage area for residual mixed solid waste; Indoor and outdoor storage areas shall comply with Uniform Building and Fire Code requirements; Storage area space requirements can be satisfied with a single location or multiple locations, and can combine both interior and exterior locations; Exterior storage areas can be located within interior side yard or rear yard areas. Exterior storage areas shall not be located within a required front yard setback or in a yard adjacent to a public or private street; Exterior storage areas shall be located in central and visible locations on a site to enhance security for users; Exterior storage areas can be located in a parking area, if the proposed use provides at least the minimum number of parking spaces required for the use after deducting the area used for storage. Storage areas shall be appropriately screened according to the provisions in 18.755.050 C, design standards; The storage area shall be accessible for collection vehicles and located so that the storage area will not obstruct pedestrian or vehicle traffic movement on the site or on public streets adjacent to the site. The proposed refuse container area is accessed from the proposed parking lot and is visible from the rear of the proposed building in order to enhance security for users. The proposed refuse container will not occupy any parking stalls and screening has been addressed above under Chapter 18.745 (Landscaping and Screening). NOTICE OF TYPE II DECISION SDR2003-00008/MINUTEMAN PRESS PAGE 15 OF 28 Design Standards. The dimensions of the storage area shall accommodate containers consistent with current methods of local collection; Storage containers shall meet Uniform Fire Code standards and be made and covered with waterproof materials or situated in a covered area; Exterior storage areas shall be enclosed by a sight-obscuring fence wall, or hedge at least six feel in height. Gate openings which allow access to users and haulers shall be provided. Gate openings for haulers shall be a minimum of 10 feet wide and shall be capable of being secured in a closed and open position• Storage area(s) and containers shall be clearly labeled to indicate the type of materials accepted. The storage area is located at the northwest corner of the property. Its dimensions are approximately 14 feet by 20 feet. The applicant has not provided information indicating that the openings are designed to allow for adequate access for haulers. Therefore, the applicant is required to provide documentation that the franchise hauler for the area is satisfied that the design of the refuse container area is compatible with waste pick up practices. FINDING: Because the applicant has not provided evidence of compliance with the Mixed Solid Waste and Recyclables Storage design standards, this standard has not been met. If the applicant complies with the condition listed below, the standards will be met: CONDITION: Provide documentation that the franchise hauler for the area is satisfied that the design of the refuse container area is compatible with waste pick up practices. OFF-STREET PARKING AND LOADING (18.765): Location of vehicle parking: Off-street parking spaces for single-family and duplex dwellings and single-family attached dwellings shall be located on the same lot with the dwellings. Off-street parking lots for uses not listed above shall be located not further than 200 feet from the building or use that they are required to serve, measured in a straight line from the building with the following exceptions: a) commercial and industrial uses which require more than 40 parking spaces may provide for the spaces in excess of the required first 40 spaces up to a distance of 300 feet from the primary site; The 40 parking spaces which remain on the primary site must be available for users in the following order of riority: 1) Disabled-accessible spaces; 2) Short-term spaces; 3) Long-term preferential carpool and vanpool spaces; 4) Long-term spaces. The parking lot associated with this project, at the furthest point away from the proposed building is 80 feet. All parking has been proposed to be located on-site. Therefore, this standard has been satisfied. Joint Parking: Owners of two or more uses, structures or parcels of land may agree to utilize jointly the same parking and loading spaces when the peak hours of operation do not overlay, subject to the following: 1) The size of the joint parking facility shall be at least as large as the number of vehicle parking spaces required by the larger(est) use per Section 18.765.070; 2) Satisfactory legal evidence shall be presented to the Director in the form of deeds, leases or contracts to establish the joint use; 3) If a joint use arrangement is subsequently terminated, or if the uses change, the requirements of this title thereafter apply to each separately. Joint parking has not been proposed with this project. Therefore, this standard does not apply. Parking in Mixed-Use Projects: In mixed-use projects, the required minimum vehicle parking shall be determined using the following formula. 1) Primary use, i.e., that with the largest proportion of total floor area within the development, at 100% of the minimum vehicle parking required for that use in Section 18.765.060; 2) Secondary use, i.e., that with the second largest percentage of total floor area within the develo ment, at 90% of the vehicle parking required gfor that use in Section 18.765.060; 3 Subsequent use or g q uses, at 80% of th vehicle parking required for that use(s) in Section 18.765.060. 4)maximum parking allowances hall be 150% of the total minimum parking as calculated in D.1.-3. above. g NOTICE OF TYPE II DECISION SDR2003-00008/MINUTEMAN PRESS PAGE 16 OF 28 The project is not considered a mixed-use project. Therefore, this standard does not apply. Visitor Parking in Multi-Family Residential Developments: Multi-dwelling units with more than 10 required parking spaces shall provide an additional 15% of vehicle parking spaces above the minimum required for the use of guests of residents of the complex. These spaces shall be centrally located or distributed throughout the development. Required bicycle parking facilities shall also be centrally located within or evenly distributed throughout the development. This project does not involve a residential use. Therefore, this standard does not apply. Preferential Long-Term Carpool/Vanpool Parking: Parking lots providing in excess of 20 long-term parking spaces shall provide preferential long-term carpool and vanpool parking for employees, students and other regular visitors to the site. At least 5% of total long-term parking spaces shall be reserved for carpool/vanpool use. Preferential parking for carpools/vanpools shall be closer to the main entrances of the building than any other employee or student parking except parking spaces designated for use by the disabled. Preferential carpool/vanpool spaces shall be full-sized per requirements in Section 18.765.040N and shall be clearly designated for use only by carpools and vanpools between 7:00 AM and 5:30 PM Monday through Friday. The proposed parking lot associated with the office building is required to provide a minimum of 19 parking stalls. One of the applicant's plans show the site to be constructed with 17 parking stalls, and another plan the applicant submitted shows 18 parking stalls. Therefore, due to site constraints, the applicant will be pressed to meet the minimum required parking (19) which is below 20 long-term parking spaces. No carpool or vanpool spaces will be conditioned. Disabled-Accessible Parking: All parking areas shall be provided with the required number of parking spaces for disabled persons as specified by the State of Oregon Uniform Building Code and federal standards. Such parking spaces shall be sized, signed and marked as required by these regulations. The applicant is required to provide a minimum of 19 parking spaces, therefore, one van accessible (9 feet wide with an 8-foot aisle) ADA handicap space is required. The applicant's plans show one ADA space that will be 9 feet wide with an 8-foot aisle. Therefore, this standard has been met. Access Drives: With regard to access to public streets from off-street parking: access drives from the street to off-street parking or loading areas shall be designed and constructed to facilitate the flow of traffic and provide maximum safety for pedestrian and vehicular traffic on the site; the number and size of access drives shall be in accordance with the requirements of Chapter, 18.705, Access, Egress and Circulation; access drives shall be clearly and permanently marked and defined through use of rails, fences, walls or other barriers or markers on frontage not occupied by service drives; access drives shall have a minimum vision clearance in accordance with Chapter 18.795, Visual Clearance; access drives shall be improved with an asphalt or concrete surface; and excluding single-family and duplex residences, except as provided by Subsection 18.810.030.P, groups of two or more parking spaces shall be served by a service drive so that no backing movements or other maneuvering within a street or other public right-of-way will be required. The plans submitted by the applicant show the access drive clearly marked with concrete curbs on either side of the proposed drive. On-site pedestrian safety is established by discouraging pedestrians from entering the property through the access drive by not providing a walkway adjacent to the drive. Instead, the applicant proposes to heavily landscape the areas adjacent to the access drive. The applicant has also provided a walkway for pedestrians to access the rear of the proposed building on the north side of the property, which is the furthest point away from the proposed access drive. Visual Clearance Is addressed further in this decision. The applicant has proposed to construct the parking area in accordance with the standards of Chapter 18.765 (Off-Street Parking and Loading Requirements), which ensure safe maneuvering and discourage backing movements with the street. Therefore, this standard has been satisfied. NOTICE OF TYPE II DECISION SDR2003-00008/MINUTEMAN PRESS PAGE 17 OF 28 Pedestrian Access: Pedestrian access through parking lots shall be provided in accordance with Section 18.705.030.F. Where a parking area or other vehicle area has a drop-off grade separation, the property owner shall install a walls railing, or other barrier which will prevent a slow-moving vehicle or driverless vehicle from escaping such area and which will prevent pedestrians from walking over drop-off edges. Pedestrian access has been discussed previously in this decision under Chapter 18.705 (Access Egress and Circulation) and access is not proposed through the parking lot. Parking Lot Striping: Except for single-family and duplex residences, any area intended to be used to meet the off-street parking requirements as contained in this Chapter shall have all parking spaces clearly marked; and all interior drives and access aisles shall be clearly marked and signed to show direction of flow and maintain vehicular and pedestrian safety . The plans submitted show the parking spaces will be clearly marked with striping. Therefore, this standard has been satisfied. Wheel Stops: Parking spaces along the boundaries of a parking lot or adjacent to interior landscaped areas or sidewalks shall be provided with a wheel stop at least four inches high located three feet back from the front of the parking stall. The front three feet of the parking stall may be concrete, asphalt or low lying landscape material that does not exceed the height of the wheel stop. This area cannot be calculated to meet landscaping or sidewalk requirements. The plans submitted by the applicant do not show wheel stops to be installed. The applicant has indicated that perimeter curbs will be installed which will be satisfactory for the boundary parking stalls. However, the internal parking stalls along the proposed sidewalk will need to be constructed with wheel stops. Space and Aisle Dimensions: Section 18.765.040.N states that: "except as modified for angled parking in Figures 18.765.1 and 18.765.2 the minimum dimensions for parking spaces are: 8.5 feet x 18.5 feet for a standard space and 7.5 feet x 16.5 feet for a compact space; aisles accommodating two direction traffic, or allowing access from both ends, shall be 24 feet in width. The applicant's plans indicate that all stalls will be 81/2 by 20 feet (standard spaces). However, the applicant has the option of providing 50% of the proposed parking as compact spaces. The access isle is shown to be 24 feet in width. Therefore, this criterion has been satisfied. Bicycle Parking Location and Access: Section 18.765.050 states bicycle parking areas shall be provided at locations within 50 feet of primary entrances to structures; bicycle parking areas shall not be located within parking aisles, landscape areas or pedestrian ways; outdoor bicycle parking shall be visible from on-site buildings and/or the street. When the bicycle parking area is not visible from the street, directional signs shall be used to located the parking area; and bicycle parking may be located inside a building on a floor which has an outdoor entrance open for use and floor location which does not require the bicyclist to use stairs to gain access to the space. Exceptions may be made to the latter requirement for parking on upper stories within a multi-story residential building. According to Table 18.765.2 of the Tigard Development Code, the minimum bicycle-parking requirement for an office use is 0.5 spaces per 1,000 square feet. Therefore, the proposed building will be required to provide a 4-stall bicycle rack. The site plan shows a 2-stall bicycle rack. Therefore, the applicant is required to provide a 4-stall bicycle rack that is within 50 feet of the west entrance. Because the proposed bicycle rack cannot be seen from SW Hermoso Way, directional signs will also be required. NOTICE OF TYPE II DECISION SDR2003-00008/MINUTEMAN PRESS PAGE 18 OF 28 Bicycle Parking Design Requirements: Section 18.765.050.C. The following design requirements apply to the installation of bicycle racks: The racks required for required bicycle parking spaces shall ensure that bicycles may be securely locked to them without undue inconvenience. Provision of bicycle lockers for long-term (employee) parking is encouraged but not required; bicycle racks must be securely anchored to the ground, wall or other structure; bicycle parking spaces shall be at least 21/2 feet by six feet long, and, when covered, with a vertical clearance of seven feet. An access aisle of at least five feet wide shall be provided and maintained beside or between each row of bicycle parking; each required bicycle parking space must be accessible without moving another bicycle; required bicycle parking spaces may not be rented or leased except where required motor vehicle parking is rented or leased. At-cost or deposit fees for bicycle parking are exempt from this requirement; and areas set aside for required bicycle parking must be clearly reserved for bicycle parking only. Outdoor bicycle parking facilities shall be surfaced with a hard surfaced material, i.e., pavers, asphalt, concrete or similar material. This surface must be designed to remain well drained. The applicant has not provided a detail of the bike rack to be used; therefore, Staff is unable to confirm that this standard is met. Minimum Bicycle Parking Requirements: The total number of required bicycle parking spaces for each use is specified in Table 18.765.2 in Section 18.765.070.H. In no case shall there be less than two bicycle parking spaces. As discussed above, Table 18.765.2 of the Tigard Development Code, requires bicycle-parking for an office use to be 0.5 spaces per 1,000 square feet. The applicant has shown a 2-stall bicycle rack and has been conditioned to provide a 4-stall bicycle rack. Minimum Off-Street Parking: Section 18.765.070.H states that the minimum and maximum parking shall be as required in Table 18.765.2. Table 18.765.2 states that the minimum parking for General Office Use is 2.7 spaces per 1,000 square feet. Based on a 7,250 square foot building, the applicant is required to provide a minimum of 19 parking spaces. One of the applicant s plans show the site to be constructed with 17 parking stalls, and another plan the applicant submitted shows 18 parking stalls. Therefore, the applicant is required to reconfigure the proposed parking lot to provide a minimum of 19 parking stalls. Off-Street Loading Spaces: Commercial, industrial and institutional buildings or structures to be built or altered which receive and distribute material or merchandise by truck shall provide and maintain off-street loading and maneuvering space as follows: A minimum of one loading space is required for buildings with 10,000 gross square feet or more; A minimum of two loading spaces for buildings with 40,000 gross square feet or more. The building is less than 10,000 square feet; therefore, the applicant is not required to provide a loading space. FINDING: Based on the analysis above, the off-street parking and loading standards have not been fully met, however, if the applicant complies with the conditions listed below, the standards will be fully met: CONDITIONS: • The applicant is required to provide all internal parking stalls along the proposed sidewalk with wheel stops. • Provide a 4-stall bicycle rack within 50 feet of the west entrance. • Provide directional signs back to the required bicycle rack. • Submit details of the bicycle rack to be used. NOTICE OF TYPE II DECISION SDR2003-00008/MINUTEMAN PRESS PAGE 19 OF 28 SIGNS (18.780): Chapter 18.780.130.D lists the type of allowable signs and sign area permitted in the MUE Zoning District. No signs have been formally proposed. However, the applicant has indicated in the narrative that a wall sign will be applied for which has been addressed above under Chapter 18.620 (Tigard Triangle Design Standards). FINDING: Because signs will be reviewed and approved as part of a separate permit process, this standard has been satisfied. Tree Removal (18.790): Section 18.790.030 requires that a tree plan for the planting, removal and protection of trees prepared by a certified arborist shall be rovided with a site development review application. The tree plan shall include identification of all existing trees, identification of a program to save existing trees or mitigate tree removal over 12 inches in caliper, which trees are to be removed, protection program defining standards and methods that will be used by the applicant to protect trees during and after construction. The applicant has provided a report prepared by a certified arborist indicating that there are a total of eight trees over 12 inches in diameter. The plans submitted show a total of ten trees over 12 inches. In any case, of the ten trees over 12 inches in diameter, one of them is considered hazardous. The applicant proposes to remove all of the trees over 12 inches in diameter on site except for two. Therefore, the applicant is retaining 20% of the trees over 12 inches in diameter and will be required to mitigate 100% of the viable trees to be removed. FINDING: Based on the analysis above, the applicant will be required to mitigate for a total of 134 inches, and prior to site work, the applicant must install all tree protection measures and contact the City's Forester and a member of the Planning Staff for sign off. CONDITIONS: Provide a tree mitigation plan for 134 inches and implement accordingly. Prior to site work, the applicant must install all tree protection measures and contact the City's Forester and a member of the Planning Staff for sign-off. VISUAL CLEARANCE AREAS (18.795): Chapter 18.795 requires that a clear vision area shall be maintained on the corners of all property adjacent to intersecting right-of-ways or the intersection of a public street and a private driveway. A clear vision area shall contain no vehicle, hedge, planting, fence, wall structure, or temporary or permanent obstruction exceeding three (3) feet in height. The code provides that obstructions that may be located in this area shall be visually clear between three (3) and eight (8) feet in height (8) (trees may be placed within this area provided that all branches below eight (8) feet are removed). A visual clearance area is the triangular area formed by measuring a 30-foot distance along the street ri9ht- of-way and the driveway, and then connecting these two (2), 30-foot distance points with a straight line. The applicant's narrative indicates that the visual clearance triangle associated with the proposed driveway and SW Hermoso Way will be free of obstructions. However, the Vegetation Survey map shows Juniperus Chinensis to be located within the visual clearance triangle. Therefore, the applicant is required to provide information verifying that the proposed shrubbery will not grow within the required three to eight foot height clearance area . FINDING: Based on the analysis above, the vision clearance standards have not been met. However, if the applicant complies with the condition listed below, the standards will be fully met. CONDITION: Provide information verifying that the proposed shrubbery located on the southern property line will not grow within the required visual clearance triangle area or trim according to the standard. NOTICE OF TYPE II DECISION SDR2003-00008/MINUTEMAN PRESS PAGE 20 OF 28 C. SPECIFIC SITE DEVELOPMENT REVIEW APPROVAL STANDARDS Section 18.360.090(A)(2) through 18.360.090(A)(15) provides additional Site Development Review approval standards not necessarily covered by the provisions of the previously listed sections. These additional standards are addressed immediately below with the following exceptions: The proposal contains no elements related to the provisions of the following and are, therefore, found to be inapplicable as approval standards: 18.360.090.3 (Exterior Elevations); 18.360.090.5 (Privacy and Noise: Multi-family or Group Living Uses); 18.360.090.6 (Private Outdoor Areas: Multi-family Use); 18.360.090.7 (Shared Outdoor Recreation Areas: Multi-family Use); 18.360.090.8 (100-year floodplain); and 18.360.090.9 (Demarcation of Spaces). The following sections were discussed previously in this decision and, therefore, will not be addressed in this section: 18.360.090.4 (Buffering, Screening and Compatibility Between Adjoining Uses; 18.360.090.13 (P(Parking); 18.360.090.14 (Landscaping); 18.360.090.15 (Drainage); and 18.360.090.14 rovision for the Disabled). Relationship to the Natural and Physical Environment: Buildings shall be: located to preserve existing trees, topography and natural drainage where possible based upon existing site conditions; located in areas not subject to ground slumping or sliding; located to provide adequate distance between adjoining buildings for adequate light, air circulation, and fire-fighting; and oriented with consideration for sun and wind. Trees shall be preserved to the extent possible. Replacement of trees is subject to the requirements of Chapter 18.790, Tree Removal. The building is located on the site in accordance with the Tigard Triangle Design Standards. The site is not in an area identified as prone to sliding. The building has a 40-foot buffer from the nearest adjoining property line, thus, providing adequate light and air circulation. The Deputy Fire Marshall has submitted comments located under agency comments. Crime Prevention and Safety: A. Windows shall be located so that areas vulnerable to crime can be surveyed by the occupants; B. Interior laundry and service areas shall be located in a way that they can be observed by others; C. Mail boxes shall be located in lighted areas having vehicular or pedestrian traffic; D. The exterior lighting levels shall be selected and the angles shall be oriented towards areas vulnerable to crime; and E. Light fixtures shall be provided in areas having heavy pedestrian or vehicular traffic and in potentially dangerous areas such as parking lots, stairs, ramps and abrupt grade changes. Fixtures shall be placed at a height so that light patterns overlap at a height of seven feet, which is sufficient to illuminate a person. Windows are oriented towards the parking lot and the street. The City of Tigard Police Department has reviewed this project and requests a detailed lighting plan for the exterior. Public Transit: Provisions within the plan shall be included for providing for transit if the development proposal is adjacent to existing or proposed transit route; the requirements for transit facilities shall be based on: the location of other transit facilities in the area; and the size and type of the proposal. The following facilities may be required after City and Tri-Met review: bus stop shelters; turnouts for buses; and connecting paths to the shelters. The site has frontage on SW Hermoso Way, which is not on Tri-Met transit routes, therefore, this standard does not apply. NOTICE OF TYPE II DECISION SDR2003-00008/MINUTEMAN PRESS PAGE 21 OF 28 Provisions of the Underlying Zone: All of the provisions and regulations of the underlying zone shall apply unless modified by other sections or this title, e.g., Planned Developments, Chapter 18.350; or a variance or adjustment granted under Chapter 18.370. Dimensional Requirements: Dimensional standards have been addressed above under Section 18.520.040 (Development Standards). However, Section 18.520.050 (Special Limitations on Uses) requires the maximum floor area ratio (FAR) for all commercial and industrial use types and mixed-use developments shall not exceed 0.40 in the MUE zoning district. The subject site is approximately .42 acres (18,182 feet), therefore, the proposed building cannot exceed 7,273 square feet. The applicant has proposed a 7,250 square foot building. FINDING: Based on the analysis above, the underlying zoning district standards have not been fully met, however, if the applicant complies with the conditions listed below, the standards will be fully met. CONDITION:Submit a detailed lighting plan to the Tigard Police Department and the Tigard Planning Department for review. D. STREET AND UTILITY IMPROVEMENTS STANDARDS (18.8101: Chapter 18.81U provides construction standards tor the implementation of public and private facilities and utilities such as streets, sewers, and drainage. The applicable standards are addressed below: Streets: Improvements: Section 18.810.030.A.1 states that streets within a development and streets adjacent shall be improved in accordance with the TDC standards. Section 18.810.030.A.2 states that any new street or additional street width planned as a portion of an existing street shall be dedicated and improved in accordance with the TDC. Minimum Rights-of-Way and Street Widths: Section 18.620.080.A, Tigard Triangle Street and Accessway Standards, requires a local street to have a 60 right-of-way width and 36-foot paved section. Other improvements required may include on-street parking sidewalks and bikeways, underground utilities, street lighting, storm drainage, and street trees. This site lies adjacent to SW Hermosa Way, which is classified as a local street on the City of Tigard Transportation Plan Map. At present, there is approximately 25 feet of ROW from centerline, according to the most recent tax assessor's map. The applicant must dedicate an additional 5 feet of ROW to meet street standards. SW Hermosa Way is currently partially improved. In order to mitigate the impact from this development, the applicant must construct half-street improvements along the frontage of the site. The applicant's plans show they will make this improvement as a part of this project. The paved width from centerline shall be 18 feet. Sidewalks: Section 18.810.070.A requires that sidewalks be constructed to meet City design standards and be located on both sides of arterial, collector and local residential streets. Private streets and industrial streets shall have sidewalks on at least one side. The applicant's plans indicate construction of a new sidewalk behind a planter strip. Therefore, the criterion is met. Sanitary Sewers: Sewers Required: Section 18.810.090.A requires that sanitary sewer be installed to serve each new development and to connect developments to existing mains in accordance with the provisions set forth in Design and Construction Standards for Sanitary and Surface Water Management (as adopted by Clean Water Services in 1996 and including any future revisions or amendments) and the adopted policies of the comprehensive plan. NOTICE OF TYPE II DECISION SDR2003-00008/MINUTEMAN PRESS PAGE 22 OF 28 Over-sizing: Section 18.810.090.0 states that proposed sewer systems shall include consideration of additional development within the area as projected by the Comprehensive Plan. There is an existing 8-inch sewer line in Hermosa Way. The applicant's plan shows they will extend a new sewer lateral to the site to serve the new building. This site is located in Sanitary Sewer Reimbursement District #15. Any unpaid assessment would have to be paid prior to issuance of a building permit. The applicant should contact Greg Berry, Utility Engineer, City of Tigard, for the current assessment for this site. Storm Drainage: General Provisions: Section 18.810.100.A requires developers to make adequate provisions for storm water and flood water runoff. Accommodation of Upstream Drainage: Section 18.810.100.0 states that a culvert or other drainage facility shall be large enough to accommodate potential runoff from its entire upstream drainage area, whether inside or outside the development. The City Engineer shall approve the necessary size of the facility, based on the provisions of Design and Construction Standards for Sanitary and Surface Water Management (as adopted by Clean Water Services in 2000 and including any future revisions or amendments). The applicant's street improvement plans shall include the extension of the public storm sewer in Hermosa Way to the north end of their frontage. Catch basin(s) will be installed per the standard spacing requirements and connect to the public storm line. Therefore, this standard has been satisfied. Effect on Downstream Drainage: Section 18.810.100.D states that where it is anticipated by the City Engineer that the additional runoff resulting from the development will overload an existing drainage facility, the Director and Engineer shall withhold approval of the development until provisions have been made for improvement of the potential condition or until provisions have been made for storage of additional runoff caused by the development in accordance with the Design and Construction Standards for Sanitary and Surface Water Management (as adopted by Clean Water Services in 2000 and including any future revisions or amendments). In 1997, Clean Water Services (CWS) completed a basin study of Fanno Creek and adopted the Fanno Creek Watershed Management Plan. Section V of that plan includes a recommendation that local governments institute a stormwater detention/effective impervious area reduction program resulting in no net increase in storm peak flows up to the 25-year event. The City will require that all new developments resulting in an increase of impervious surfaces provide onsite detention facilities, unless the development is located adjacent to Fanno Creek. For those developments adjacent to Fanno Creek, the storm water runoff will be permitted to discharge without detention. The applicant's plan shows that stormwater runoff will be conveyed to a water quality/detention swale along the west boundary of the site. The engineer's calculations provide for detention of the 25 year storm. The engineer shall submit additional calculations for the 2 and 10 year storms, per CWS Design Standards. The engineer had also submitted supplemental information for the discharge point of the storm swale with the initial application for completeness. This information addressed downstream concerns along with a revised outfall detail. This information shall be included with the applicant's PFI submittal. Utilities: Section 18.810.120 states that all utility lines, but not limited to those required for electric, communication, lighting and cable television services and related facilities shall be placed underground, except for surface mounted transformers, surface mounted connection boxes and meter cabinets which may be placed above ground, temporary utility service facilities during construction, high capacity electric lines operating at 50,000 volts or above, and: NOTICE OF TYPE II DECISION SDR2003-00008/MINUTEMAN PRESS PAGE 23 OF 28 • The developer shall make all necessary arrangements with the serving utility to provide the underground services; • The City reserves the right to approve location of all surface mounted facilities; • All underground utilities, including sanitary sewers and storm drains installed in streets by the developer, shall be constructed prior to the surfacing of the streets; and • Stubs for service connections shall be long enough to avoid disturbing the street improvements when service connections are made. Exception to Under-Grounding Requirement: Section 18.810.120.0 states that a developer shall pay a fee in-lieu of under-grounding costs when the development is proposed to take place on a street where existing utilities which are not underground will serve the development and the approval authority determines that the cost and technical difficulty of under-grounding the utilities outweighs the benefit of under- grounding in conjunction with the development. The determination shall be on a case- by-case basis. The most common, but not the only, such situation is a short frontage development for which under-grounding would result in the placement of additional poles, rather than the removal of above-ground utilities facilities. An applicant for a development which is served by utilities which are not underground and which are located across a public right-of-way from the applicant's property shall pay a fee in-lieu of under-grounding. There are existing overhead utility lines along the frontage of SW Hermosa Way. If the fee in-lieu is proposed, it is equal to $35.00 per lineal foot of street frontage that contains the overhead lines. The frontage along this site is 125 lineal feet; therefore, the fee would be $4,375.00. ADDITIONAL CITY AND/OR AGENCY CONCERNS WITH STREET AND UTILITY IMPROVEMENT STANDARDS: Traffic Study Findings: Kittelson & Associates, Inc. prepared a Trip Generation and Distribution Assessment, dated September 8, 2003. Kittelson analyzed two key intersections: SW 72n,d Avenue/SW Dartmouth Street SW 68"' Avenue/SW Dartmouth Street These two critical intersections have been identified as needing traffic signals. As development has occurred in the Tigard Triangle, and where a development introduces additional trips to these intersections, funds have been collected from the developers that will contribute to the future signal installation. The first project to contribute funds to the intersections was Babies R Us. A simple formula was established bawd upon the impact from that development. That project had an impact of 1.1% at SW 72n Avenue/SW Dartmouth Street during the PM peak hour. For that impact, the City Council required the developer to pay funds in the amount of $20,000.00. At the intersection of SW 68' Avenue/SW Dartmouth Street, the impact from that project was estimated to be 0.75%. For this impact, the developer was required to pay $10,000.00. Using the same rationale, a proportionate share has been calculated for other projects in the Triangle, and can be calculated for this project. In order to provide the most fair comparison to the Babies R Us project, it is necessary to use the same anticipated total entering volumes (TEV) estimated as part of the Babies R Us traffic report. That report anticipated more build-out of the triangle area, including the Tri-County site at 72nd/Dartmouth. Kittelson's report ,shows that this project will generate 5 PM peak hour trips at the intersection of 72 Avenue/Dartmouth Street. With a total entering volume (TEV) of 2,555 vehicles, the project impact is 0.20%. Therefore, based on simple proportions, the project contribution to this intersection is $3,636.00. Likewise, the Kittelsohi report shows that the project will generate 2 PM peak hour trips at the intersection of 68' Avenue/Dartmouth Street. With a TEV of 2,660 vehicles, the impact from this development is 0.08%. Therefore, based on the same proportion used in the Babies R Us development, the project contribution to this intersection is $1,002.00. NOTICE OF TYPE II DECISION SDR2003-00008/MINUTEMAN PRESS PAGE 24 OF 28 Funds for both intersections must be paid to the City prior to a final building inspection. Public Water System: This site is located within the Tualatin Valley Water District (TVWD). There is an existing 12-inch water line located in SW Hermosa Way. The applicant has indicated that they will be using the existing water service. The applicant needs to show on their plans how fire hydrant spacing standards will be met. TVWD will have to review and approve the applicant's proposed water line plans. Storm Water Quality: The City has agreed to enforce Surface Water Management (SWM) regulations established by Clean Water Services (CWS) Design and Construction Standards (adopted by Resolution and Order No. 00-7) which require the construction of on-site water quality facilities. The facilities shall be designed to remove 65 percent of the phosphorus contained in 100 percent of the storm water runoff generated from newly created impervious surfaces. In addition, a maintenance plan shall be submitted indicating the frequency and method to be used in keeping the facility maintained through the year. Prior to construction, the applicant shall submit plans and calculations for a water quality facility that will meet the intent of the CWS Design Standards. In addition, the applicant shall submit a maintenance plan for the facility that must be reviewed and approved by the City prior to construction. The applicant's plans show that they will construct an extended dry detention swale to treat the onsite runoff. To ensure compliance with Clean Water Services design and construction standards, the applicant shall employ the design engineer responsible for the design and specifications of the private water quality facility to perform construction and visual observation of the water quality facility for compliance with the design and specifications. These inspections shall be made at significant stages throughout the .project and at completion of the construction. Prior to final building inspection, the design engineer shall provide the City of Tigard (Inspection Supervisor) with written confirmation that the water quality facility is in compliance with the design and specifications. Grading and Erosion Control: CWS Design and Construction Standards also regulate erosion control to reduce the amount of sediment and other pollutants reaching the public storm and surface water system resulting from development, construction, grading, excavating, clearing, and any other activity which accelerates erosion. Per CWS regulations, the applicant is required to submit an erosion control plan for City review and approval prior to issuance of City permits. The Federal Clean Water Act requires that a National Pollutant Discharge Elimination System (NPDES) erosion control permit be issued for any development that will disturb one or more acre of land. Since this site is over five acres, the developer will be required to obtain an NPDES permit from the City prior to construction. This permit will be issued along with the site and/or building permit. The Building Division, as a part of the site permit review, will review a grading/erosion control plan. An NPDES permit is not required, as the development will not disturb more than one acre. Address Assignments: The City of Tigard is responsible for assigning addresses for parcels within the City of Tigard and within the Urban Service Boundary (USB). An addressing fee in the amount of $50.00 per address shall be assessed. This fee shall be paid to the City prior to final plat approval. For this project, the addressing fee will be $50.00 (1 lots and/or tracts X $50/address = $50.00). NOTICE OF TYPE II DECISION SDR2003-00008/MINUTEMAN PRESS PAGE 25 OF 28 E. IMPACT STUDY (18.390): Section 18.360.090 states, "The Director shall make a finding with respect to each of the following criteria when approving, approving with conditions or denying an application:' Section 18.390.040 states that the applicant shall provide an impact study to quantify the effect of development on public facilities and services. For each public facility system and type of impact, the study shall propose improvements necessary to meet City standard, and to minimize the impact of the development on the public at large, public facilities systems, and affected private property users. In situations where the Community Development Code requires the dedication of real property interests, the applicant shall either specifically concur with a requirement for public right-of-way dedication, or provide evidence that supports that the real property dedication is not roughly proportional to the projected impacts of the development. Section 18.390.040 states that when a condition of approval requires the transfer to the public of an interest in real property, the approval authority shall adopt findings which support the conclusion that the interest in real property to be transferred is roughly proportional to the impact the proposed development will have on the public. The applicant has provided an impact study addressing the project's impacts on public systems. The Washington County Traffic Impact Fee (TIF) is a mitigation measure that is required at the time of development. Based on a transportation impact study prepared by Mr. David Larson for the A-Boy Expansion/Dolan II/Resolution 95-61, TIF's are expected to recapture 32 percent of the traffic impact of new development on the collector and arterial Street system. The applicant will be required to pay TIF's of approximately $25,022 based on the use proposed. Based on the estimate that total TIF fees cover 32 percent of the impact, on major street improvements citywide, a fee that would cover 100 percent of this projects traffic impact is $78,194 ($25,022 divided by .32). The difference between the TIF paid, and the full impact, is considered the unmitigated impact on the street system. The unmitigated impact of this project on the transportation system is 53,172. The applicant has proposed to construct half-street improvements along SW Hermoso Way. The cost of the improvements is expected to be $35,888 (625 square feet x $15.00 per square foot = $9,375 for dedicated right-of-way + 4,638 for signalization + 125 lineal feet x $175.00 per lineal foot = $21,875 for half street improvements.) Thus, it is roughly proportional to the unmitigated impacts. In any event, the applicant has proposed to construct these improvements. SECTION VII. OTHER STAFF COMMENTS City of Tigard Long Range Planning Division has reviewed the proposal and has no objections to it. City of Tigard Police Department has reviewed the proposal and has provided the following comments: Please provide a "lighting plan" to determine lighting levels in and around the building. City of Tigard Water Department has reviewed the proposal and has no objections to it. City of Tigard Building Division has reviewed the proposal and has offered the following comments: An accessible route to the public way is required from the lower level or an elevator will be required. City of Tigard Urban Forester has reviewed the proposal and has no objections to it. NOTICE OF TYPE II DECISION SDR2003-00008/MINUTEMAN PRESS PAGE 26 OF 28 • SECTION VIII. AGENCY COMMENTS Tri-Met has reviewed the proposal and has no objections to it. Washington County has reviewed the proposal and has no objections to it. Tualatin Valley Fire and Rescue has reviewed the proposal and has provided the following comments: 1) PAINTED CURBS: Where required, fire apparatus access roadway curbs shall be painted yellow and marked "NO PARKING FIRE LANE" at each 25 feet. Lettering shall have a stroke of not less than one inch wide by six inches high. Lettering shall be white on red or black on yellow background. (UFC Sec. 901.4.5.2) 2) COMMERCIAL BUILDINGS - REQUIRED FIRE FLOW: The required fire flow for the building shall not exceed 3,000 gallons per minute (GPM) or the available GPM in the water delivery system at 20 psi, whichever is less. A worksheet for calculating the required fire flow is available from the Fire Marshal's Office. (UFC Sec. 903.3) The minimum required fire flow is 2299 gpm @ 20 psi. Documentation shall be provided. 3) COMMERCIAL BUILDINGS - FIRE HYDRANTS: No portion of the exterior of a commercial building shall be located more than 250 feet from a fire hydrant when measured in an approved manner around the outside of the building and along an approved fire apparatus access roadway. Any hydrants that are left over from the minimum number of hydrant calculations may be full filled by hydrants that are up to 500 feet from any point of the building. The fire Prevention Ordinance has further requirements that need to be used for acceptance and placement of fire hydrants. (UFC Sec. 903.4.2.1) 4) COMMERCIAL BUILDINGS - MINIMUM NUMBER OF FIRE HYDRANTS: The minimum number of fire hydrants for a building shall be based on the required fire flow prior to giving credit for fire protection systems divided by 1500. If the answer is equal to or greater than x.5 the next whole number of hydrants shall be used. There shall not be less than 2 hydrants per building. (UFC Sec. 903.4.2.1) Considerations for placingfire hydrants shall be as follows: . Existing hydrants in the area may be used to meet the required number of hydrants; however, hydrants that are over 500 feet away from the nearest point of the subject building shall not contribute to the required number of hydrants. . Hydrants that are separated from the subject building by railroad tracks shall not contribute to the required number of hydrants. . Hydrants that are separated from the subject building by divided highway, freeway, or heavily traveled collector streets shall not contribute to the required number of hydrants. . Hydrants that are accessible only by a bridge shall be acceptable to contribute to the required number of hydrants only if approved by the Chief. . Private hydrants or public hydrants that are on adjacent private property shall not contribute to the required number of hydrants for the subject building. . Exce t� ion: The use of hydrants located on other private property may be considered if their locations and access are encumbered in a legal document (such as deed restriction) by the owners of the involved parcels of property. The encumbrance may be lifted only after approvals by the Chief on behalf of the fire department and any other governmental agencies that may require approval. . When evaluatin the placement of hydrants at apartment or industrial complexes the first hydrant s) to be placed shall be at the primary access and any secondary access to the si e. After these hydrants have been placed other hydrants shall be sited to meet the above requirements for spacing and minimum number of hydrants. (UFC Sec. 903.4.2.1.1) 5) FIRE HYDRANT DISTANCE FROM AN ACCESS ROAD: Fire hydrants shall be located not more than 15 feet from an approved fire apparatus access roadway. (UFC Sec. 903.4.2.4) NOTICE OF TYPE II DECISION SDR2003-00008/MINUTEMAN PRESS PAGE 27 OF 28 SECTION VIII. AGENCY COMMENTS Tri-Met has reviewed the proposal and has no objections to it. Washington County has reviewed the proposal and has no objections to it. Tualatin Valley Fire and Rescue has reviewed the proposal and has provided the following comments: 1) PAINTED CURBS: Where required, fire apparatus access roadway curbs shall be painte yellow an marked "NO PARKING FIRE LANE" at each 25 feet. Lettering shall have a stroke of not less than one inch wide by six inches high. Lettering shall be white on red or black on yellow background. (UFC Sec. 901.4.5.2) 2) COMMERCIAL BUILDINGS - REQUIRED FIRE FLOW: The required fire flow for the buildings a no excee ga ons per menu e (GP ) or the available GPM in the water delivery system at 20 psi, whichever is less. A worksheet for calculating the required fire flow is available from the Fire Marshal's Office. (UFC Sec. 903.3) The minimum required fire flow is 2299 gpm @ 20 psi. Documentation shall be provided. 3) COMMERCIAL BUILDINGS - FIRE HYDRANTS: No portion of the exterior of a commercial building shall be located more than 250 feet from a fire hydrant when measured in an approved manner around the outside of the building and along an approved fire apparatus access roadway. Any hydrants that are left over from the minimum number of hydrant calculations may be full filled by hydrants that are up to 500 feet from any point of the building. The fire Prevention Ordinance has further requirements that need to be used for acceptance and placement of fire hydrants. (UFC Sec. 903.4.2.1) 4) COMMERCIAL BUILDINGS - MINIMUM NUMBER OF FIRE HYDRANTS: The minimum number o ire hydrants or a ui ing shall be based on the require ire flow prior to giving credit for fire protection systems divided by 1500. If the answer is equal to or greater than x.5 the next whole number of hydrants shall be used. There shall not be less than 2 hydrants per building. (UFC Sec. 903.4.2.1) Considerations for lacin fire hydrants shall be as follows: Existing hydrants in e area may be use to meet the required number of hydrants; however, hydrants that are over 500 feet away from the nearest point of the subject building shall not contribute to the required number of hydrants. Hydrants that are separated from the subject building by railroad tracks shall not contribute to the required number of hydrants. Hydrants that are separated from the subject building by divided highway, freeway, or heavily traveled collector streets shall not contribute to the required number of hydrants. Hydrants that are accessible only by a bridge shall be acceptable to contribute to the required number of hydrants only if approved by the Chief. Private hydrants or public hydrants that are on adjacent private property shall not contribute to the required number of hydrants for the subject building. Exce Lion: The use of hydrants located on other private property may be considered if their locations and access are encumbered in a legal document such as deed restriction by the owners of the involved parcels of property. The encumbrance may e lifted only after approvals by the Chief on behalf of the fire department and any other governmental agencies that may require approval. When evaluati31e. the pplacement of hydrants at apartment or industrial complexes the first hydra) to be placed shall be at the primary access and any secondary access to the After these hydrants have been placed other hydrants shall be sited to meet the above requirements for spacing and minimum number of hydrants. (UFC Sec. 903.4.2.1.1) 5) FIRE HYDRANT DISTANCE FROM AN ACCESS ROAD: Fire hydrants shall be located no more an 15 ee rom an approve ire appara us access roadway. (UFC Sec. 903.4.2.4) NOTICE OF TYPE 11 DECISION SDR2003-00008/MINUTEMAN PRESS PAGE 28 OF 29 6) REFLECTIVE HYDRANT MARKERS: Fire hydrant_locations shall be identified by the installation of reflective markers. The markers shall be blue. They shall be located adjacent and to the side of the centerline of the access road way that the fire hydrant is located on. In case that there is no center line, then assume a centerline, and place the reflectors accordingly. (UFC Sec. 901.4.3) 7) FIRE HYDRANT/FIRE DEPARTMENT CONNECTION: A fire hydrant shall be located within 70 feet of a fire department connection (FDC). fire hydrants and FDC's shall be located on the same side of the fire apparatus access roadway. (UFC Sec. 903.4.2.5) FDC locations shall be approved by the Chief. (1996 Oregon Structural Specialty Code, Sec. 904.1.1) 8) ACCESS AND FIRE FIGHTING WATER SUPPLY DURING CONSTRUCTION: Approved fire apparatus access roadways and fire fighting water supplies shall be installed and operational prior to any other construction on the site or subdivision. (UFC Sec. 8704) 9) BUILDING SURVEY: A building survey and plans, in accordance with TVF&R Ordinance 99-01, Appendix III-F, shall be submitted. A copy of Appendix III-F, the building survey form and the instructions are available on the Fire District web site. To access this information via Internet, follow this link: SECTION IX. PROCEDURE AND APPEAL INFORMATION Notice: Notice was posted at City Hall and mailed to: X The applicant and owners X Owner of record within the required distance X Affected government agencies Final Decision: THIS DECISION IS FINAL ON NOVEMBER 25, 2003 AND BECOMES EFFECTIVE ON DECEMBER 12, 2003 UNLESS AN APPEAL IS FILED. Appeal: I hedecision of the Director (Type II Procedure) or Review Authority (Type II Administrative Appeal or Type III Procedure) is final for purposes of appeal on the date that it is mailed. Any party with standing as provided in Section 18.390.040.G.1. may appeal this decision in accordance with Section 18.390.040.G.2. Of the Tigard Community Development Code which provides that a written appeal together with the required fee shall be filed with the Director within ten (10) business days of the date the notice of the decision was mailed. The appeal fee schedule and forms are available from the Planning Division of Tigard City Hall, 13125 SW Hall Boulevard, Tigard, Oregon 97223. Unless the applicant is the appellant, the hearing on an appeal from the Director's Decision shall be confined to the specific issues identified in the written comments submitted by the parties during the comment period. Additional evidence concerning issues.properly raised in the Notice ofAppeal may be submitted by any party during the appeal hearing subject to any additional rules of procedure that may be adopted from time to time by the appellate body. THE DEADLINE FOR FILING AN APPEAL IS AT 5:00 PM ON DECEMBER 11, 2003. Questions: if you have any questions, please call the City of Tigard Planning Division, Tigard City Hall, 13125 SW Hall Boulevard, Tigard, Oregon at (503) 639-4171. November 25, 2003 . . . . -7 *' ew c - ::.ger DATE — - P Inner • �� . :� November 25, 2003 " " 07 • : ': 'c ar• '. :ew- r'= ,min ��• CITY of TIGARD . Allhibh GEOGRAPHIC INFORMATION SYSTEM VICINITY MAP _ DAR SDR2003-00008 � rum 11111 MINUTEMAN PRESS powni M OSO an 114 me pr 1111117iiiillibil ¢ .rrfxtni �au : Qy TA sT ` ecsP lQe .-- tkAaHM RD 'I�■ ' r Q Tigard Area Map CV- GONZAGA S" • 4 i litili Ihill r N 0 100 200 300 400 500 Feet c , I,308 reel SW A = i.:.,i.,,.ii.,, rm City of Tigard 11 Infoation on this map is for general location only and should be verified with the Development Services Division. 13125 SW Hall Blvd • Tigard,OR 97223 (503)639-4171 • I r http://wvnv.ci.tigard.or.us Community Development Plot date: Oct 13, 2003;C:\magic\MAGIC03.APR d N ...... ...........o o 0 r, : O ty a F NI m mi . zdi) x OS ',. IX o r 9 2. 4- Z N+Ii ' r4 4 b ii 87,.61 t "q- z Zia „ta. B ” a ■� �� i, o! qqq•r _ -- tn +,„� h�III iz X x 4\----------sr---_________IT 4 •—_________ zV1 n per .'!! rr� .J;". :s"''._.:+�.—�, mfr�f ^��y �"1 la,- � � WAY , S, 40 CO7 . I. 3 t a W Z o 77 °c �' al M a N o0 VI /iii CITY OF TIGARD PLANNING DIVISION Y , NOTICE OF TYPE II DECISION SITE DEVELOPMENT REVIEW (SDR) 2003-00008 1-IV CITY OF TIGARD MINUTEMAN PRESS Community Devetopment Shaping Better Community 120 DAYS = 2/5/2004 SECTION I. APPLICATION SUMMARY FILE NAME: MINUTEMAN PRESS CASE NO.: Site Development Review (SDR) SDR2003-00008 PROPOSAL: The applicant is requesting Site Development Review approval to construct a 7,250 square foot commercial office building and associated site improvements. A 1 ,673 square foot residence currently occupies the site and is proposed to be removed. APPLICANT: Bob Davidson OWNER: John & Marjorie Joens Minuteman Press PMB 130 14285 SW Pacific Highway 944 Vetrans Way, #105 Tigard, OR 97224 Redmond, OR 97756 APPLICANT'S Rory Antis REP.: Gray Purcell, Inc. PO Box 23516 Portland, OR 97281-3516 LOCATION: 7545 SW Hermoso Way; WCTM 2S101AB, Tax Lot 1501. ZONE: MUE; Mixed Use Employment. The MUE zoning district is designed to apply to a majority of the land within the Tigard Triangle, a regional mixed-use employment district bounded by Pacific Highway (HWY. 99), Highway 217 and 1-5. This zoning district permits a wide range of uses including major retail goods and services, business/professional offices, civic uses and housing; the latter includes multi-family housing at a maximum density of 25 units/acre, equivalent to the R-25 zoning district. APPLICABLE REVIEW CRITERIA: Community Development Code Chapters 18.360, 18.390, 18.520, 18.620, 18.705, 18.725, 18.745, 18.755, 18.765, 18.780, 18.790, 18.795 and 18.810. SECTION II . DECISION Notice is hereby given that the City of Tigard Community Development Director's designee has APPROVED the above request subject to certain conditions of approval. The findings and conclusions on which the decision is based are noted in the full decision, available at City Hall. THIS APPROVAL SHALL BE VALID FOR 18 MONTHS FROM THE EFFECTIVE DATE OF THIS DECISION. All documents and applicable criteria in the above-noted file are available for inspection at no cost or copies can be obtained for twenty-five cents (25 ) per page, or the current rate charged for copies at the time of the request. SECTION III. PROCEDURE AND APPEAL INFORMATION Notice: Notice mailed to: X The applicant and owners X Owner of record within the required distance X Affected government agencies Final Decision: THIS DECISION IS FINAL ON NOVEMBER 25, 2003 AND BECOMES EFFECTIVE ON DECEMBER 12, 2003 UNLESS AN APPEAL IS FILED. A eal: The Director's Decision is final on the date that it is mailed. All persons entitled to notice or who are otherwise adversely affected or aggrieved by the decision as provided in Section 18.390.040.G.1 may appeal this decision in accordance with Section 18.390.040.G.2 of the Tigard Community Development Code which provides that a written appeal together with the required fee shall be filed with the Director within ten (10) business days of the date the Notice of Decision was mailed. The appeal fee schedule and forms are available from the Planning Division of Tigard City Hall, 13125 SW Hall Boulevard, Tigard, Oregon 97223. Unless the applicant is the appellant, the hearing on an appeal from the Director's Decision shall be confined to the specific issues identified in the written comments submitted by the parties during the comment period. Additional evidence concerning, issues properly raised in the Notice of Appeal may be submitted by any party during the appeal hearing, subject to any additional rules of procedure that may be adopted from time to time by the appellate body. THE DEADLINE FOR FILING AN APPEAL IS 5:00 PM ON DECEMBER 11, 2003. I Questions: For further information please contact the Planning Division Staff Planner, Mathew Scheidegqer at (503) 639-4171 , Tigard City Hall, 13125 SW Hall Boulevard, Tigard, Oregon 97223. 1 is - naNlry MAP � SDR2003-00008 W all MINUTEMAN PRESS /rip min r-_ //if ''' _Is Impliftma d,,,top lommosi,:" 1,111 ...,7/L.A44ii ,/--.--:. :., il --4--- Timil"„tivil g 111 - A --->a, 11111111 ®� +i``TT M ....... Sys h /r .w.- a... mi.SL � Z 4. 1- , 1a b T 1116611111 i , Q a. ca cc 1..;: �`�! I, ! C7 1 LL It1 U Inn_ w- \ LW.ammo n MY OF TIG ARC t SDR2003-00009 se-re I uAm MINUTEMAN PRESS (Map is not to scalp) N NOTICE TO MORTGAGEE, LIENHOLDER,VENDOR OR SELLER: THE TIGARD DEVELOPMENT CODE REQUIRES THAT IF YOU RECEIVE THIS NOTICE,IT SHALL BE PROMPTLY FORWARDED TO THE PURCHASER. NOTICE OF PENDING LAND USE APPLICATION DEVELOPMENT REVIEW O CITY OF TIGARD Community Development Shaping/` Better Community DATE OF NOTICE: October 14, 2003 FILE NUMBER: SITE DEVELOPMENT REVIEW (SDR) 2003-00008 Type II Land Use Application FILE NAME: MINUTEMAN PRESS PROPOSAL: The applicant is requesting Site Development Review approval to construct a 7,250 square foot commercial office building and associated site improvement. A 1,673 square foot residence currently occupies the site and is proposed to be removed. ZONE: MUE: Mixed-Use Employment. The MUE zoning district is designed to apply to a majority of the land within the Tigard Triangle, a regional mixed-use employment district bounded by Pacific Highway (Hwy. 99), Highway 217 and 1-5. This zoning district permits a wide range of uses including major retail goods and services, business/professional offices, civic uses and housing; the latter includes multi-family housing at a maximum density of 25 units/acre, equivalent to the R-25 zoning district. APPLICABLE REVIEW CRITERIA: Community Development Code Chapters 18.360, 18.390, 18.520, 18.620, 18.705, 18.725, 18.745, 18.755, 18.765, 18.780, 18.790, 18.795 and 18.810. LOCATION: 7545 SW Hermoso Way; WCTM 2S101AB, Tax Lot 1501. YOUR RIGHT TO PROVIDE WRITTEN COMMENTS: Prior to the City making any decision on the Application, you are hereby provided a fourteen (14) day period to submit written comments on the application to the City. THE FOURTEEN (14) DAY PERIOD ENDS AT 5:00 PM ON OCTOBER 28, 2003. All comments should be directed to Mathew Scheideqqer, Associate Planner in the Planning Division at the City of Tigard, 13125 SW Hall Boulevard, Tigard, Oregon 97223. You may reach the City of Tigard by telephone at (503) 639-4171 or by e-mail to mattsci.tiqard.or.us. ALL COMMENTS MUST BE RECEIVED BY THE CITY OF TIGARD IN WRITING PRIOR TO 5:00 PM ON THE DATE SPECIFIED ABOVE IN ORDER FOR YOUR COMMENTS TO BE CONSIDERED IN THE DECISION MAKING PROCESS THE CITY OF TIGARD APPRECIATES RECEIVING COMMENTS AND VALUES YOUR INPUT. COMMENTS WILL BE CONSIDERED AND ADDRESSED WITHIN THE NOTICE OF DECISION. A DECISION ON THIS ISSUE IS TENTATIVELY SCHEDULED FOR NOVEMBER 20, 2003. IF YOU PROVIDE COMMENTS, YOU WILL BE SENT A COPY OF THE FULL DECISION ONCE IT HAS BEEN RENDERED. WRITTEN COMMENTS WILL BECOME A PART OF THE PERMANENT PUBLIC RECORD AND SHALL CONTAIN THE FOLLOWING INFORMATION: • Address the specific "Applicable Review Criteria" described in the section above or any other criteria believed to be applicable to this proposal; • Raise any issues and/or concerns believed to be important with sufficient evidence to allow the City to provide a response; • Comments that provide the basis for an appeal to the Tigard Hearings Officer must address the relevant approval criteria with sufficient specificity on that issue. Failure of any party to address the relevant approval criteria with sufficient specificity may preclude subsequent appeals to the Land Use Board of Appeals or Circuit Court on that issue. Specific findings directed at the relevant approval criteria are what constitute relevant evidence. AFTER THE 14 DAY COMMENT PERIOD CLOSES, THE DIRECTOR SHALL ISSUE A TYPE II ADMINISTRATIVE DECISION. THE DIRECTOR'S DECISION SHALL BE MAILED TO THE APPLICANT AND TO OWNERS OF RECORD OF PROPERTY LOCATED WITHIN 500 FEET OF THE SUBJECT SITE, AND TO ANYONE ELSE WHO SUBMITTED WRITTEN COMMENTS OR WHO IS OTHERWISE ENTITLED TO NOTICE. THE DIRECTOR'S DECISION SHALL ADDRESS ALL OF THE RELEVANT APPROVAL CRITERIA. BASED UPON THE CRITERIA AND THE FACTS CONTAINED WITHIN THE RECORD, THE DIRECTOR SHALL APPROVE, APPROVE WITH CONDITIONS OR DENY THE REQUESTED PERMIT OR ACTION. SUMMARY OF THE DECISION-MAKING PROCESS: • The application is accepted by the City • Notice is sent to property owners of record within 500 feet of the proposed development area allowing a 14-day written comment period. • The application is reviewed by City Staff and affected agencies. • City Staff issues a written decision. • Notice of the decision is sent to the Applicant and all owners or contract purchasers of record of the site; all owners of record of property located within 500 feet of the site, as shown on the most recent property tax assessment roll; any City-recognized neighborhood group whose boundaries include the site; and any governmental agency which is entitled to notice under an intergovernmental agreement entered into with the City which includes provision for such notice or anyone who is otherwise entitled to such notice. INFORMATION/EVIDENCE AVAILABLE FOR REVIEW: The application, written comments and supporting documents relied upon by the Director to make this decision are contained within the record and are available for public review at the City of Tigard Community Development Department. Copies of these items may be obtained at a cost of $.25 per page or the current rate charged for this service. Questions regarding this application should be directed to the Planning Staff indicated on the first page of this Notice under the section titled "Your Right to Provide Written Comments." -- CITY of TIGARD"(y VICINITY MAP DAR .� SDR2003-00008 H MINUTEMAN PRESS 01111111111111■ 44 LAND S ■� rtr 71F GO�NZAGA S' � N o )ac mu wa .on SOO hot ti aw...i SW . Ciry of Tigard /IYtl N.-MieC.MM Mabp wM S. e.PWbI. i)1)S Sw MM BM REQUEST FOR COMMENTS MEMORANDUM CITY OF TIGARD, OREGON DATE: 11/10/03 TO: Matt Scheidegger, Associate Planner FROM: Kim McMillan, Development Review Engine RE: SDR2003-00008 Minuteman Press Access Management (Section 18.705.030.H) Section 18.705.030.H.1 states that an access report shall be submitted with all new development proposals which verifies design of driveways and streets are safe by meeting adequate stacking needs, sight distance and deceleration standards as set by ODOT, Washington County, the City and AASHTO. The applicant has indicated that visual clearance standards can be met. The applicant did not address sight distance. The applicant's engineer shall provide a final sight distance certification prior to the issuance of the building permit. Street And Utility Improvements Standards (Section 18.810): Chapter 18.810 provides construction standards for the implementation of public and private facilities and utilities such as streets, sewers, and drainage. The applicable standards are addressed below: Streets: Improvements: Section 18.810.030.A.1 states that streets within a development and streets adjacent shall be improved in accordance with the TDC standards. Section 18.810.030.A.2 states that any new street or additional street width planned as a portion of an existing street shall be dedicated and improved in accordance with the TDC. Minimum Rights-of-Way and Street Widths: Section 18.620.080.A, Tigard Triangle Street and Accessway Standards, requires a local street to have a 60 right-of-way width and 36-foot paved section. Other improvements required may include on-street parking, sidewalks and bikeways, underground utilities, street lighting, storm drainage, and street trees. ENGINEERING COMMENTS SDR2003-00008 Minuteman Press PAGE 1 This site lies adjacent to SW Hermosa Way, which is classified as a local street on the City of Tigard Transportation Plan Map. At present, there is approximately 25 feet of ROW from centerline, according to the most recent tax assessor's map. The applicant should dedicate an additional 5 feet of ROW. SW Hermosa Way is currently partially improved. In order to mitigate the impact from this development, the applicant should construct half-street improvements along the frontage of the site. The applicant's plans show they will make this improvement as a part of this project. The paved width from centerline shall be 18 feet. Sidewalks: Section 18.810.070.A requires that sidewalks be constructed to meet City design standards and be located on both sides of arterial, collector and local residential streets. Private streets and industrial streets shall have sidewalks on at least one side. The applicant's plans indicate construction of a new sidewalk behind a planter strip. Therefore, the criterion is met. Sanitary Sewers: Sewers Required: Section 18.810.090.A requires that sanitary sewer be installed to serve each new development and to connect developments to existing mains in accordance with the provisions set forth in Design and Construction Standards for Sanitary and Surface Water Management (as adopted by Clean Water Services in 1996 and including any future revisions or amendments) and the adopted policies of the comprehensive plan. Over-sizing: Section 18.810.090.0 states that proposed sewer systems shall include consideration of additional development within the area as projected by the Comprehensive Plan. There is an existing 8-inch sewer line in Hermosa Way. The applicant's plan shows they will extend a new sewer lateral to the site to serve the new building. This site is located in Sanitary Sewer Reimbursement District #15. Any unpaid assessment would have to be paid prior to issuance of a building permit. The applicant should contact Greg Berry, Utility Engineer, City of Tigard, for the current assessment for this site. ENGINEERING COMMENTS SDR2003-00008 Minuteman Press PAGE 2 Storm Drainage: General Provisions: Section 18.810.100.A requires developers to make adequate provisions for storm water and flood water runoff. Accommodation of Upstream Drainage: Section 18.810.100.0 states that a culvert or other drainage facility shall be large enough to accommodate potential runoff from its entire upstream drainage area, whether inside or outside the development. The City Engineer shall approve the necessary size of the facility, based on the provisions of Design and Construction Standards for Sanitary and Surface Water Management (as adopted by Clean Water Services in 2000 and including any future revisions or amendments). The applicant's street improvement plans shall include the extension of the public storm sewer in Hermosa Way to the north end of their frontage. Effect on Downstream Drainage: Section 18.810.100.D states that where it is anticipated by the City Engineer that the additional runoff resulting from the development will overload an existing drainage facility, the Director and Engineer shall withhold approval of the development until provisions have been made for improvement of the potential condition or until provisions have been made for storage of additional runoff caused by the development in accordance with the Design and Construction Standards for Sanitary and Surface Water Management (as adopted by Clean Water Services in 2000 and including any future revisions or amendments). In 1997, Clean Water Services (CWS) completed a basin study of Fanno Creek and adopted the Fanno Creek Watershed Management Plan. Section V of that plan includes a recommendation that local governments institute a stormwater detention/effective impervious area reduction program resulting in no net increase in storm peak flows up to the 25-year event. The City will require that all new developments resulting in an increase of impervious surfaces provide onsite detention facilities, unless the development is located adjacent to Fanno Creek. For those developments adjacent to Fanno Creek, the storm water runoff will be permitted to discharge without detention. The applicant's plan shows that stormwater runoff will be conveyed to a water quality/detention swale along the west boundary of the site. The engineer's calculations provide for detention of the 25 year storm. The engineer shall submit additional calculations for the 2 and 10 year storms, per CWS Design Standards. The engineer had also submitted supplemental information for the discharge point of the storm swale with the initial application for completeness. This information addressed downstream concerns along with a revised outfall detail. This information shall be included with the applicant's PFI submittal. ENGINEERING COMMENTS SDR2003-00008 Minuteman Press PAGE 3 Utilities: Section 18.810.120 states that all utility lines, but not limited to those required for electric, communication, lighting and cable television services and related facilities shall be placed underground, except for surface mounted transformers, surface mounted connection boxes and meter cabinets which may be placed above ground, temporary utility service facilities during construction, high capacity electric lines operating at 50,000 volts or above, and: • The developer shall make all necessary arrangements with the serving utility to provide the underground services; • The City reserves the right to approve location of all surface mounted facilities; • All underground utilities, including sanitary sewers and storm drains installed in streets by the developer, shall be constructed prior to the surfacing of the streets; and • Stubs for service connections shall be long enough to avoid disturbing the street improvements when service connections are made. Exception to Under-Grounding Requirement: Section 18.810.120.0 states that a developer shall pay a fee in-lieu of under-grounding costs when the development is proposed to take place on a street where existing utilities which are not underground will serve the development and the approval authority determines that the cost and technical difficulty of under- grounding the utilities outweighs the benefit of under-grounding in conjunction with the development. The determination shall be on a case- by-case basis. The most common, but not the only, such situation is a short frontage development for which under-grounding would result in the placement of additional poles, rather than the removal of above-ground utilities facilities. An applicant for a development which is served by utilities which are not underground and which are located across a public right-of-way from the applicant's property shall pay a fee in-lieu of under- grounding. There are existing overhead utility lines along the frontage of SW Hermosa Way. If the fee in-lieu is proposed, it is equal to $ 35.00 per lineal foot of street frontage that contains the overhead lines. The frontage along this site is 125 lineal feet; therefore the fee would be $ 4375.00. ADDITIONAL CITY AND/OR AGENCY CONCERNS WITH STREET AND UTILITY IMPROVEMENT STANDARDS: ENGINEERING COMMENTS SDR2003-00008 Minuteman Press PAGE 4 Traffic Study Findings: Kittelson & Associates, Inc. prepared a Trip Generation and Distribution Assessment, dated September 8, 2003. Kittelson analyzed two key intersections: SW 72nd Avenue/SW Dartmouth Street SW 68th Avenue/SW Dartmouth Street These two critical intersections have been identified as needing traffic signals. As development has occurred in the Tigard Triangle, and where a development introduces additional trips to these intersections, funds have been collected from the developers that will contribute to the future signal installation. The first project to contribute funds to the intersections was Babies R Us. A simple formula was established based upon the impact from that development. That project had an impact of 1.1% at SW 72nd Avenue/SW Dartmouth Street during the PM peak hour. For that impact, the City Council required the developer to pay funds in the amount of $20,000.00. At the intersection of SW 68th Avenue/SW Dartmouth Street, the impact from that project was estimated to be 0.75%. For this impact, the developer was required to pay $10,000.00. Using the same rationale, a proportionate share has been calculated for other projects in the Triangle, and can be calculated for this project. In order to provide the most fair comparison to the Babies R Us project, it is necessary to use the same anticipated total entering volumes (TEV) estimated as part of the Babies R Us traffic report. That report anticipated more build-out of the triangle area, including the Tri-County site at 72nd/Dartmouth. Kittelson's report shows that this project will generate 5 PM peak hour trips at the intersection of 72nd Avenue/Dartmouth Street. With a total entering volume (TEV) of 2,555 vehicles, the project impact is 0.20%. Therefore, based on simple proportions, the project contribution to this intersection is $3636.00. Likewise, the Kittelson report shows that the project will generate 2 PM peak hour trips at the intersection of 68th Avenue/Dartmouth Street. With a TEV of 2,660 vehicles, the impact from this development is 0.08%. Therefore, based on the same proportion used in the Babies R Us development, the project contribution to this intersection is $1002.00. Funds for both intersections must be paid to the City prior to a final building inspection. Public Water System: This site is located within the Tualatin Valley Water District (TVWD). There is an existing 12-inch water line located in SW Hermosa Way. The applicant has indicated that they will be using the existing water service. The applicant needs ENGINEERING COMMENTS SDR2003-00008 Minuteman Press PAGE 5 • to show on their plans how fire hydrant spacing standards will be met. TVWD will have to review and approve the applicant's proposed water line plans. Storm Water Quality: The City has agreed to enforce Surface Water Management (SWM) regulations established by Clean Water Services (CWS) Design and Construction Standards (adopted by Resolution and Order No. 00-7) which require the construction of on-site water quality facilities. The facilities shall be designed to remove 65 percent of the phosphorus contained in 100 percent of the storm water runoff generated from newly created impervious surfaces. In addition, a maintenance plan shall be submitted indicating the frequency and method to be used in keeping the facility maintained through the year. Prior to construction, the applicant shall submit plans and calculations for a water quality facility that will meet the intent of the CWS Design Standards. In addition, . the applicant shall submit a maintenance plan for the facility that must be reviewed and approved by the City prior to construction. The applicant's plans show that they will construct an extended dry detention swale to treat the onsite runoff. To ensure compliance with Clean Water Services design and construction standards, the applicant shall employ the design engineer responsible for the design and specifications of the private water quality facility to perform construction and visual observation of the water quality facility for compliance with the design and specifications. These inspections shall be made at significant stages throughout the project and at completion of the construction. Prior to final building inspection, the design engineer shall provide the City of Tigard (Inspection Supervisor) with written confirmation that the water quality facility is in compliance with the design and specifications. Grading and Erosion Control: CWS Design and Construction Standards also regulate erosion control to reduce the amount of sediment and other pollutants reaching the public storm and surface water system resulting from development, construction, grading, excavating, clearing, and any other activity which accelerates erosion. Per CWS regulations, the applicant is required to submit an erosion control plan for City review and approval prior to issuance of City permits. The Federal Clean Water Act requires that a National Pollutant Discharge Elimination System (NPDES) erosion control permit be issued for any development that will disturb one or more acre of land. Since this site is ENGINEERING COMMENTS SDR2003-00008 Minuteman Press PAGE 6 over five acres, the developer will be required to obtain an NPDES permit from the City prior to construction. This permit will be issued along with the site and/or building permit. The Building Division, as a part of the site permit review, will review a grading/erosion control plan. An NPDES permit is not required, as the development will not disturb more than one acre. Address Assignments: The City of Tigard is responsible for assigning addresses for parcels within the City of Tigard and within the Urban Service Boundary (USB). An addressing fee in the amount of $ 50.00 per address shall be assessed. This fee shall be paid to the City prior to final plat approval. For this project, the addressing fee will be $50.00 (1 lots and/or tracts X $50/address = $50.00). Recommendations: THE FOLLOWING CONDITIONS SHALL BE SATISFIED PRIOR TO ISSUANCE OF THE SITE PERMIT: Submit to the Engineering Department (Kim McMillan, 639-4171, ext. 2642) for review and approval: Prior to issuance of a site permit, a Public Facility Improvement (PFI) permit is required for this project to cover the half-street improvements in Hermoso Way and any other work in the public right-of-way. Eight (8) sets of detailed public improvement plans shall be submitted for review to the Engineering Department. NOTE: these plans are in addition to any drawings required by the Building Division and should only include sheets relevant to public improvements. Public Facility Improvement (PFI) permit plans shall conform to City of Tigard Public Improvement Design Standards, which are available at City Hall and the City's web page (www.ci.tigard.or.us). The PFI permit plan submittal shall include the exact legal name, address and telephone number of the individual or corporate entity who will be designated as the "Permittee", and who will provide the financial assurance for the public improvements. For example, specify if the entity is a corporation, limited partnership, LLC, etc. Also specify the state within which the entity is incorporated and provide the name of the corporate contact person. Failure to provide accurate information to the Engineering Department will delay processing of project documents. ENGINEERING COMMENTS SDR2003-00008 Minuteman Press PAGE 7 The applicant shall provide a construction vehicle access and parking plan for approval by the City Engineer. The purpose of this plan is for parking and traffic control during the public improvement construction phase. All construction vehicle parking shall be provided on-site. No construction vehicles or equipment will be permitted to park on the adjoining residential public streets. Construction vehicles include the vehicles of any contractor or subcontractor involved in the construction of site improvements or buildings proposed by this application, and shall include the vehicles of all suppliers and employees associated with the project. Prior to issuance of the Site Permit, the applicant shall pay an addressing fee in the amount of $50.00. (STAFF CONTACT: Shirley Treat, Engineering). Additional right-of-way shall be dedicated to the Public along the frontage of SW Hermoso Way to increase the right-of-way to 30 feet from the centerline. The description shall be tied to the existing right-of-way centerline. The dedication document shall be on City forms. Instructions are available from the Engineering Department. The applicant shall submit construction plans to the Engineering Department as a part of the Public Facility Improvement permit, which indicate that they will construct a half-street improvement along the frontage of SW Hermoso Way. The improvements adjacent to this site shall include: A. City standard pavement section for a local street from curb to centerline equal to 18 feet; B. pavement tapers needed to tie the new improvement back into the existing edge of pavement shall be built beyond the site frontage; C. concrete curb, or curb and gutter as needed; D. storm drainage, including any off-site storm drainage necessary to convey surface and/or subsurface runoff; E. 6 foot concrete sidewalk with a planter strip; F. street trees in the planter strip spaced per TDC requirements; G. street striping; H. streetlight layout by applicant's engineer, to be approved by City Engineer; underground utilities; J. street signs (if applicable); K. driveway apron (if applicable); and L. adjustments in vertical and/or horizontal alignment to construct SW Hermoso Way in a safe manner, as approved by the Engineering Department. A profile of Hermoso Way shall be required, extending 300 feet either side of the subject site showing the existing grade and proposed future grade. ENGINEERING COMMENTS SDR2003-00008 Minuteman Press PAGE 8 The applicant shall obtain approval from the Tualatin Valley Water District for the proposed water connection prior to issuance of the City's Public Facility Improvement permit. The applicant shall provide an on-site water quality facility as required by Clean Water Services Design and Construction Standards (adopted by Resolution and Order No. 00-7). Final plans and calculations shall be submitted to the Engineering Department (Kim McMillan) for review and approval prior to issuance of the site permit. In addition, a proposed maintenance plan shall be submitted along with the plans and calculations for review and approval. The applicant's water quality/quantity facility shall include design of the 2, 10 and 25 year storms. The plans shall also include the engineer's proposed revisions to the outfall, as outlined in his correspondence dated 10/04/03. An erosion control plan shall be provided as part of the Public Facility Improvement (PFI) permit drawings. The plan shall conform to the "Erosion Prevention and Sediment Control Design and Planning Manual, February 2003 edition." The applicant's engineer shall provide a post construction sight distance certification. Prior to issuance of the site permit, the applicant shall pay the current assessment for this site as it pertains to Sewer Reimbursement District No. 15. STAFF CONTACT: Greg Berry, Utility Engineer, (503) 639-4171, ext. 2468. The applicant's PFI submittal shall include the extension of the public storm sewer in Hermoso Way. THE FOLLOWING CONDITIONS SHALL BE SATISFIED PRIOR TO A FINAL BUILDING INSPECTION: Submit to the Engineering Department (Kim McMillan, 639-4171, ext. 2642) for review and approval: Prior to a final building inspection, the applicant shall complete the required public improvements, obtain conditional acceptance from the City, and provide a one-year maintenance assurance for said improvements. Prior to a final building inspection, the applicant shall provide the City with as-built drawings of the public improvements as follows: 1) 3 mil mylar, 2) a ENGINEERING COMMENTS SDR2003-00008 Minuteman Press PAGE 9 diskette of the as-builts in "DWG" format, if available; otherwise "DXF" will be acceptable, and 3) the as-built drawings shall be tied to the City's GPS network. The applicant's engineer shall provide the City with an electronic file with points for each structure (manholes, catch basins, water valves, hydrants and other water system features) in the development, and their respective X and Y State Plane Coordinates, referenced to NAD 83 (91). The applicant shall either place the existing overhead utility lines along SW Hermoso Way underground as a part of this project, or they shall pay the fee in-lieu of undergrounding. The fee shall be calculated by the frontage of the site that is parallel to the utility lines and will be $ 35.00 per lineal foot. If the fee option is chosen, the amount will be $ 4375.00 and it shall be paid prior to the final building inspection. To ensure compliance with Clean Water Services design and construction standards, the applicant shall employ the design engineer responsible for the design and specifications of the private water quality facility to perform construction and visual observation of the water quality facility for compliance with the design and specifications. These inspections shall be made at significant stages, and at completion of the construction. Prior to final building inspection, the design engineer shall provide the City of Tigard (Inspection Supervisor) with written confirmation that the water quality facility is in compliance with the design and specifications. Staff Contact: Hap Watkins, Building Division. The Trip Generation funds for the intersections of SW 72nd/Dartmouth and SW 68t /Dartmouth must be paid prior to a final building inspection. ENGINEERING COMMENTS SDR2003-00008 Minuteman Press PAGE 10 TUALATIN VALLEY FIRE & RESCUE • SOUTH DIVISION COMMUNITY SERVICES • OPERATIONS • FIRE PREVENTION Tualatin Valley Fire & Rescue October 27, 2003 Mathew Scheideggerr, Associate Planner City of Tigard 13125 SW Hall Blvd Tigard, OR 97223 Re: Minuteman Press Dear Mathew, I have reviewed the submittal for the above named project and have the following comments: 1) PAINTED CURBS: Where required, fire apparatus access roadway curbs shall be painted yellow and marked "NO PARKING FIRE LANE" at each 25 feet. Lettering shall have a stroke of not less than one inch wide by six inches high. Lettering shall be white on red or black on yellow background. (UFC Sec. 901.4.5.2) 2) COMMERCIAL BUILDINGS - REQUIRED FIRE FLOW: The required fire flow for the building shall not exceed 3,000 gallons per minute (GPM) or the available GPM in the water delivery system at 20 psi, whichever is less. A worksheet for calculating the required fire flow is available from the Fire Marshal's Office. (UFC Sec. 903.3) The minimum required fire flow is 2299 gpm @ 20 psi. Documentation shall be provided. 3) COMMERCIAL BUILDINGS - FIRE HYDRANTS: No portion of the exterior of a commercial building shall be located more than 250 feet from a fire hydrant when measured in an approved manner around the outside of the building and along an approved fire apparatus access roadway. Any hydrants that are left over from the minimum number of hydrant calculations may be full filled by hydrants that are up to 500 feet from any point of the building. The fire Prevention Ordinance has further requirements that need to be used for acceptance and placement of fire hydrants. (UFC Sec. 903.4.2.1) 4) COMMERCIAL BUILDINGS - MINIMUM NUMBER OF FIRE HYDRANTS: The minimum number of fire hydrants for a building shall be based on the required fire flow prior to giving credit for fire protection systems divided by 1500. If the answer is equal to or greater than x.5 the next whole number of hydrants shall be used. There shall not be less than 2 hydrants per building. (UFC Sec. 903.4.2.1) Considerations for placing fire hydrants shall be as follows: • Existing hydrants in the area may be used to meet the required number of hydrants; however, hydrants that are over 500 feet away from the nearest point of the subject building shall not contribute to the required number of hydrants. • Hydrants that are separated from the subject building by railroad tracks shall not contribute to the required number of hydrants. • Hydrants that are separated from the subject building by divided highway, freeway, or heavily traveled collector streets shall not contribute to the required number of hydrants. • Hydrants that are accessible only by a bridge shall be acceptable to contribute to the required number of hydrants only if approved by the Chief. • Private hydrants or public hydrants that are on adjacent private property shall not contribute to the required number of hydrants for the subject building. 7401 SW Washo Court,Suite 101 •Tualatin,Oregon 97062•Tel.(503)612-7000•Fax(503)612-7003•www.tvfr.com • Exception: The use of hydrants located on other private property may be considered if their locations and access are encumbered in a legal document (such as deed restriction) by the owners of the involved parcels of property. The encumbrance may be lifted only after approvals by the Chief on behalf of the fire department and any other governmental agencies that may require approval. • When evaluating the placement of hydrants at apartment or industrial complexes the first hydrant(s) to be placed shall be at the primary access and any secondary access to the site. After these hydrants have been placed other hydrants shall be sited to meet the above requirements for spacing and minimum number of hydrants. (UFC Sec. 903.4.2.1.1) 5) FIRE HYDRANT DISTANCE FROM AN ACCESS ROAD: Fire hydrants shall be located not more than 15 feet from an approved fire apparatus access roadway. (UFC Sec. 903.4.2.4) 6) REFLECTIVE HYDRANT MARKERS: Fire hydrant_locations shall be identified by the installation of reflective markers. The markers shall be blue. They shall be located adjacent and to the side of the centerline of the access road way that the fire hydrant is located on. In case that there is no center line, then assume a centerline, and place the reflectors accordingly. (UFC Sec. 901.4.3) 7) FIRE HYDRANT/FIRE DEPARTMENT CONNECTION: A fire hydrant shall be located within 70 feet of a fire department connection (FDC). Fire hydrants and FDC's shall be located on the same side of the fire apparatus access roadway. (UFC Sec. 903.4.2.5) FDC locations shall be approved by the Chief. (1996 Oregon Structural Specialty Code, Sec. 904.1.1) 8) ACCESS AND FIRE FIGHTING WATER SUPPLY DURING CONSTRUCTION: Approved fire apparatus access roadways and fire fighting water supplies shall be installed and operational prior to any other construction on the site or subdivision. (UFC Sec. 8704) 9) BUILDING SURVEY: A building survey and plans, in accordance with TVF&R Ordinance 99-01, Appendix III-F, shall be submitted. A copy of Appendix III-F, the building survey form and the instructions are available on the Fire District web site. To access this information via Internet, follow this link: http://www.tvfr.com/Dept/fm/brochures/index.htm Please contact me at (503) 612-7010 with any additional questions. Sincerely, Eric T . McMullen Eric T. McMullen Deputy Fire Marshal ` DATE: 11...26�v)f PLANS CHECK NO PROJECT TITLE: �"i� COUNTYWIDE TVI `- TRAFFIC IMPACT FEE WORKSHEET APPLICANT: (FOR NON-SINGLE FAMILY USES) MAILING ADDRESS: CITY/ZIP/PHONE TAX MAP NO.: SITES NO.ADDRESS: LAND USE CATEGORY RATE PER TRIP RESIDENTIAL $ 253.00 BUSINESS AND COMMERCIAL $ 64.00 OFFICE $ 233.00 INDUSTRIAL $ 244.00 INSTITUTIONAL $ 105.00 PAYMENT METHOD: CASH/CHECK CREDIT BANCROFT(PROMISSORY NOTE) INSTITUTIONAL ONLY DEFER TO OCCUPANCY LAND USE CATEGORY DESCRIP N OF USE WEEKDAY AVG. WEEKEND AVG TRIP RATE 7/O 4 .0 [e _ TRIP RATE J/ �/ A /!��. BASIS: �f (P•J [ CALCULATIONS: so ` _ cx, 491A416.1 ±14 rte = 7A25--- ..,c ,4,,..31 , 11g: AS- 60 j,F j1 �•)Sx 01.93 f �-7 6-3-04. a r C� a,o I b _. az-a-` ° aa 1�1 TI! PROJECT TRIP GENERATION: {�-�` '' �, I � � �� FEE: P FOR ACCOUNTING PURPOSES ONLY ADDITIONAL NOTES: ]4„^ 0� /03 °:it* ---ii---Auctc,M,s, -tor■ 1 K t 1- taW r- ! DX 01 53I'/ a 6. D i�' ROAD AMT.:)0, s,(}� cin / ��� TRANSIT AMT. /��� PREP ED Bl^y _^ f WASH CO LAND DEV. Fax:503-846-2908 Oct 17 2003 7:56 P. 01 ilftWASHINGTON COUNTY, OREGON Department of Land Use and Transportation,Land Development Services liiiiir 155 North First Avenue,Suite 350-13,Hillsboro,Oregon 97124 (503)846-8761 •FAX:(503)846.2905 October 17, 2003 Mathew Scheidegger City of Tigard 13125 SW Hall Tigard, OR 97223 Fax No. 503-684-7297 No. of Pages: 1 RE: Minuteman Press City File Number: SDR 2003-00008 Tax Map and Lot Number: 2S101AB 1501 Location: 7545 SW Hermoso Way Applicant: Gray Purcell, Inc. Owner: Minuteman Press of Tigard I LE NAT oft 'NMI .. : willillair Rh* . .12$t i1AB0.1501 I • Washington County Department of Land Use and Transportation has received notice of the above noted application but will not be submitting any requirements/conditions. The project site is not adjacent to County-maintained road sections, nor is it expected to generate considerable off-site impacts to our nearby roadways. Thank you for the opportunity to comment. If you have any questions, please contact me at 503-846-8131. ?4i-el--/-4 Phil Healy Senior Planner F:\Shared\LDS\W PS HARE\TRANSP\NOCOMM.doc Page 1 of 1 Matt Scheidegger- Site Dev Review 2003-00008 From: "Bill Erdle" <bill.erdle @verizon.net> To: <matts @ci.tigard.or.us> Date: 10/15/03 5:51 PM Subject: Site Dev Review 2003-00008 Dear Mr. Scheidegger: I'm responding to a notice for comments on the Minuteman Press site development review for 7545 SW Hermoso Way. I live at 7405 SW Beveland, and I admit I have a vested interest in my following suggestion. However, I do feel it's also a valid concern. I assume most trips to Minuteman Press will be via Beveland Rd. In fact, the traffic on the road has increased dramatically along with all the new development. I've noticed pedestrians are taking some risk as they walk along the sidewalk on the north side of Beveland when they come to my property. The sidewalk terminates just into my property and then continues from the other side of my property on down the road. There are a lot of people having to walk on the road after they park their cars and then walk to one of the businesses on Beveland. There are always a lot of cars parked along this part of the road. I know you don't require anyone to pay for a sidewalk until some business purchases the property, and I certainly don't want to pay for one nor can I afford one myself. However, with the increased traffic on Beveland and the addition of Minuteman Press, the City may want to consider paying for the remaining sidewalk that is needed to help keep these people out of harm's way. It's just a thought I had. I'm fine with or without it, but I'd hate to see anyone get hit by a car. Bill Erdle file://C:\WINDOWS\TEMP\GW}00002.HTM 10/16/03 l�; REQUEST FOR COMMENTS CITY OF IGARD Community(Development Shaping_A Better Community DATE: October 14 2003 TO: Jim Wolf,Tigard Police Department Crime Prevention Officer FROM: City of Tigard Planning Division STAFF CONTACT: Mathew Scheidegger,Associate Planner[x24311 Phone: (5031 639-4111/Fax: (5031 684-1291 SITE DEVELOPMENT REVIEW ISDRI 2003-00008 MINUTEMAN PRESS REQUEST: The applicant is requesting Site Development Review approval to construct a 7,250 square foot commercial office building and associated site improvement. A 1,673 square foot residence currently occupies the site and is proposed to be removed. LOCATION: 7545 SW Hermoso Way; WCTM 2S101AB, Tax Lot 1501. ZONE: MUE: Mixed-Use Employment. The MUE zoning district is designed to apply to a majority of the land within the Tigard Triangle, a regional mixed-use employment district bounded by Pacific Highway (Hwy. 99), Highway 217 and 1-5. This zoning district permits a wide range of uses including major retail goods and services, business/professional offices, civic uses and housing; the latter includes multi-family housing at a maximum density of 25 units/acre, equivalent to the R-25 zoning district. APPLICABLE REVIEW CRITERIA: Community Development Code Chapters 18.360, 18.390, 18.520, 18.620, 18.705, 18.725, 18.745, 18.755, 18.765, 18.780, 18.790, 18.795 and 18.810. Attached are the Site Plan, Vicinity Map and Applicant's Materials for your review. From information supplied by various departments and agencies and from other information available to our staff, a report and recommendation will be prepared and a decision will be rendered on the proposal in the near future. If you wish to comment on this application, WE NEED YOUR COMMENTS BACK BY OCTOBER 28, 2003. You may use the space provided below or attach a separate letter to return your comments. If you are unable to respond by the above date, please phone the staff contact noted above with your comments and confirm your comments in writing as soon as possible. If you have any questions, contact the Tigard Planning Division, 13125 SW Hall Boulevard, Tigard, OR 97223. PLEASE CHECK THE FOLLOWING ITEMS THAT APPLY: We have reviewed the proposal and have no objections to it. Please contact of our office. T Please refer to the enclosed letter. Written comments provided below: 9m9tyk 51/4 „pion A e,-kQ\o( „\\ `A\- Ow^ c. „\I'l 1?(o,4 -Avravnorhan of 9ark■sit3 AI Qq. Name & Number of Person Commenting: CA,v40Vf 1% 29.) REQUEST FOR COMMENTS CITY OFTIGARD Community'Development Shaping \Oyommunity DATE: October 14,2003 TO: Barbara Shields,Long Range Planning Manager — ��✓ FROM: City of Tigard Planning Division STAFF CONTACT: Mathew Scheidegger,Associate Planner[x24311 Phone: [503)639-4111/Fax: [5031684-1297 SITE DEVELOPMENT REVIEW[SDRI 2003-00008 r MINUTEMAN PRESS Q REQUEST: The applicant is requesting Site Development Review approval to construct a 7,250 square foot commercial office building and associated site improvement. A 1,673 square foot residence currently occupies the site and is proposed to be removed. LOCATION: 7545 SW Hermoso Way; WCTM 2S101AB, Tax Lot 1501 . ZONE: MUE: Mixed-Use Employment. The MUE zoning district is designed to apply to a majority of the land within the Tigard Triangle, a regional mixed-use employment district bounded by Pacific Highway (Hwy. 99), Highway 217 and 1-5. This zoning district permits a wide range of uses including major retail goods and services, business/professional offices, civic uses and housing; the latter includes multi-family housing at a maximum density of 25 units/acre, equivalent to the R-25 zoning district. APPLICABLE REVIEW CRITERIA: Community Development Code Chapters 18.360, 18.390, 18.520, 18.620, 18.705, 18.725, 18.745, 18.755, 18.765, 18.780, 18.790, 18.795 and 18.810. Attached are the Site Plan, Vicinity Map and Applicant's Materials for your review. From information supplied by various departments and agencies and from other information available to our staff, a report and recommendation will be prepared and a decision will be rendered on the proposal in the near future. If you wish to comment on this application, WE NEED YOUR COMMENTS BACK BY: OCTOBER 28, 2003. You may use the space provided below or attach a separate letter to return your comments. If you are unable to respond by the above date, please phone the staff contact noted above with your comments and confirm your comments in writing as soon as possible. If you have any questions, contact the Tigard Planning Division, 13125 SW Hall Boulevard, Tigard, OR 97223. PL ASE CHECK THE FOLLOWING ITEMS THAT APPLY: \ We have reviewed the proposal and have no objections to it. Please contact of our office. Please refer to the enclosed letter. Written comments provided below: Name & Number of Person Commenting: REQUEST FOR COMMENTS CITY OF TIGARD Community'DeveCopmen t Shaping Better Community DATE: October 14,2003 TO: Brian Blalock,Commercial Plans Examiner FROM: City of Tigard Planning Division STAFF CONTACT: Mathew Scheidegger,Associate Planner 1x24311 Phone: (503)639-4171/Fax: (5031684-7291 SITE DEVELOPMENT REVIEW(SDRI 2003-00008 MINUTEMAN PRESS REQUEST: The applicant is requesting Site Development Review approval to construct a 7,250 square foot commercial office building and associated site improvement. A 1 ,673 square foot residence currently occupies the site and is proposed to be removed. LOCATION: 7545 SW Hermoso Way; WCTM 2S101AB, Tax Lot 1501 . ZONE: MUE: Mixed-Use Employment. The MUE zoning district is designed to apply to a majority of the land within the Tigard Triangle, a regional mixed-use employment district bounded by Pacific Highway (Hwy. 99), Highway 217 and 1-5. This zoning district permits a wide range of uses including major retail goods and services, business/professional offices, civic uses and housing; the latter includes multi-family housing at a maximum density of 25 units/acre, equivalent to the R-25 zoning district. APPLICABLE REVIEW CRITERIA: Community Development Code Chapters 18.360, 18.390, 18.520, 18.620, 18.705, 18.725, 18.745, 18.755, 18.765, 18.780, 18.790, 18.795 and 18.810. Attached are the Site Plan, Vicinity Map and Applicant's Materials for your review. From information supplied by various departments and agencies and from other information available to our staff, a report and recommendation will be prepared and a decision will be rendered on the proposal in the near future. If you wish to comment on this application, WE NEED YOUR COMMENTS BACK BY: OCTOBER 28, 2003. You may use the space provided below or attach a separate letter to return your comments. If you are unable to respond by the above date, please phone the staff contact noted above with your comments and confirm your comments in writing as soon as possible. If you have any questions, contact the Tigard Planning Division, 13125 SW Hall Boulevard, Tigard, OR 97223. PLEASE CHECK THE FOLLOWING ITEMS THAT APPLY: We have reviewed the proposal and have no objections to it. Please contact of our office. Please refer to the enclosed letter. Written comments provided below: qi#.) Access/DLL Roui6 ro The PO!3 ,c the is ,e9. 09 FRar+ THE LOWER ( 6YEL oA A& '4 /a w/- c- ae RE4D. Name & Number of Person Commenting: /OW $modGr._ iv) 7/c �.zcce OCT-20 03 15: 15 FROM:PROJPLANNINA 5039622281 TO: ''A36847297 PAGE:01 REQUEST FOR COMMENTS CITY ortIoARo Community"aeveloprneni ,Shaping Better Community DATE: October 14,2003 TO: Ben laldwin,Trl-Met Transit Development Protect Planner FROM: City of Tigard PlannintalvIslon STAFF CONTACT: Mathew ScheIdegoer,Associate Planner(x2431) Phone: (503)839.4111/Fax: [503)6141291 SITE DEVELOPMENT REVIEW ISORI 2003-00008 MINUTEMAN PRESS < REQUEST: The applicant is requesting Site Development Review approval to construct a 7,250 square foot commercial office building and associated site improvement. A 1 ,673 square foot residence currently occupies the site and is proposed to be removed. LOCATION: 7545 SW Hermosa Way; WCTM 2S101AB, Tax Lot 1501 . ZONE: MUE: Mixed-Use Employment. The MUE zoning district is designed to apply to a majority of the land within the Tigard Triangle, a regional mixed-use ' employment district bounded by Pacific Highway (Hwy. 99), Highway 217 and 1-5. This zoning district permits a wide range of uses including major retail goods and services, business/professional offices, civic uses and housing; the latter includes multi-family housing at a maximum density of 25 units/acre, equivalent to the R-25 zoning district. APPLICABLE REVIEW CRITERIA: Community Development Code Chapters 18.360, 18.390, 18.520, 18.620, 18.705, 18.725, 18.745, 18.755, 18.765, 18.780, 18.790, 18.795 and 18.810. 1 Attached are the Site Plan, Vicinity Map and Applicant's Materials for your review. From information supplied by various departments and agencies and from other information available to our staff, a report and recommendation will be prepared and a decision will be rendered on the proposal in the near future. If you wish to comment on this application, WENEFO YOUR "COMMENTS" B'AGf `BYa' tOCTOB'ER 28 2003. You may use the space provided below or attach a separate letter to return your comments. you are unable to respond by the above date, please phone the staff contact noted above with your comments andconfirm your comments in writing as soon as possible. If you have any questions, contact the Tigard Planning Division, 13125 SW Hall Boulevard, Tigard, OR 97223. PLEASE CHECK THE FOLLOWING ITEMS THAT APPLY: I We have reviewed the proposal and have no objections to it. Please contact _ of our office. Please refer to the enclosed fetter. Written comments provided below: - 2212_ Name & Number of Person Commenting: REQUEST FOR COMMENTS CITY l , OF Community(Development Shaping Better Community DATE: October 14,2003 TO: Matt Stine,Urban Forester/Public Works Annex FROM: City of Tigard Planning Division STAFF CONTACT: Mathew Scheidegger,Associate Planner[x24371 Phone: [503)639-4171/Fax: [5031 684-7297 SITE DEVELOPMENT REVIEW[SDR]2003-00008 MINUTEMAN PRESS REQUEST: The applicant is requesting Site Development Review approval to construct a 7,250 square foot commercial office building and associated site improvement. A 1,673 square foot residence currently occupies the site and is proposed to be removed. LOCATION: 7545 SW Hermoso Way; WCTM 2S101AB, Tax Lot 1501 . ZONE: MUE: Mixed-Use Employment. The MUE zoning district is designed to apply to a majority of the land within the Tigard Triangle, a regional mixed-use employment district bounded by Pacific Highway (Hwy. 99), Highway 217 and I-5. This zoning district permits a wide range of uses including major retail goods and services, business/professional offices, civic uses and housing; the latter includes multi-family housing at a maximum density of 25 units/acre, equivalent to the R-25 zoning district. APPLICABLE REVIEW CRITERIA: Community Development Code Chapters 18.360, 18.390, 18.520, 18.620, 18.705, 18.725, 18.745, 18.755, 18.765, 18.780, 18.790, 18.795 and 18.810. Attached are the Site Plan, Vicinity Map and Applicant's Materials for your review. From information supplied by various departments and agencies and from other information available to our staff, a report and recommendation will be prepared and a decision will be rendered on the proposal in the near future. If you wish to comment on this application, WE NEED YOUR COMMENTS BACK BY: OCTOBER 28, 2003. You may use the space provided below or attach a separate letter to return your comments. If you are unable to respond by the above date, please phone the staff contact noted above with your comments and confirm your comments in writing as soon as possible. If you have any questions, contact the Tigard Planning Division, 13125 SW Hall Boulevard, Tigard, OR 97223. PLEASE CHECK THE FOLLOWING ITEMS THAT APPLY: We have reviewed the proposal and have no objections to it. Please contact of our office. Please refer to the enclosed letter. Written comments provided below: Name & Number of Person Commenting: A. REQUEST FOR COMMENTS CITY 'Ir OF Community Development Shaping Better Community DATE: October 14,2003 TO: Dennis Koellermeier,Operations Manager/Water Department FROM: City of Tigard Planning Division STAFF CONTACT: Mathew Scheidegger,Associate Planner[x2437) Phone: [5031 639-4171/Fax: [5031684-7291 SITE DEVELOPMENT REVIEW ISDRI 2003-00008 MINUTEMAN PRESS REQUEST: The applicant is requesting Site Development Review approval to construct a 7,250 square foot commercial office building and associated site improvement. A 1 ,673 square foot residence currently occupies the site and is proposed to be removed. LOCATION: 7545 SW Hermoso Way; WCTM 2S101AB, Tax Lot 1501. ZONE: MUE: Mixed-Use Employment. The MUE zoning district is designed to apply to a majority of the land within the Tigard Triangle, a regional mixed-use employment district bounded by Pacific Highway (Hwy. 99), Highway 217 and 1-5. This zoning district permits a wide range of uses including major retail goods and services, business/professional offices, 1 civic uses and housing; the latter includes multi-family housing at a maximum density of 25 units/acre, equivalent to the R-25 zoning district. APPLICABLE REVIEW CRITERIA: Community Development Code Chapters 18.360, 18.390, 18.520, 18.620, 18.705, 18.725, 18.745, 18.755, 18.765, 18.780, 18.790, 18.795 and 18.810. Attached are the Site Plan, Vicinity Map and Applicant's Materials for your review. From information supplied by various departments and agencies and from other information available to our staff, a report and recommendation will be prepared and a decision will be rendered on the proposal in the near future. If you wish to comment on this application, WE NEED YOUR COMMENTS BACK BY: OCTOBER 28, 2003. You may use the space provided below or attach a separate letter to return your comments. If you are unable to respond by the above date, please phone the staff contact noted above with your comments and confirm your comments in writing as soon as possible. If you have any questions, contact the Tigard Planning Division, 13125 SW Hall Boulevard, Tigard, OR 97223. PLEASE CHECK THE FOLLOWING ITEMS THAT APPLY: We have reviewed the proposal and have no objections to it. _ Please contact of our office. Please refer to the enclosed letter. Written comments provided below: i)u\- *0 lt /rte Name & Number of Person Commenting: /( l • REQUEST FOR COMMENTS CITY OFTIOARD Community Development SftapingA Better Community DATE: October 14,2003 TO: PER ATTACHED FROM: City of Tigard Planning Division STAFF CONTACT: Mathew Scheitlegger,Associate Planner[x2431) Phone: [5031639-4111/Fax: [503)684-1291 SITE DEVELOPMENT REVIEW[SORT 2003-00008 MINUTEMAN PRESS REQUEST: The applicant is requesting Site Development Review approval to construct a 7,250 square foot commercial office building and associated site improvement. A 1 ,673 square foot residence currently occupies the site and is proposed to be removed. LOCATION: 7545 SW Hermoso Way; WCTM 2S101AB, Tax Lot 1501 . ZONE: MUE: Mixed-Use Employment. The MUE zoning district is designed to apply to a majority of the land within the Tigard Triangle, a regional mixed-use employment district bounded by Pacific Highway (Hwy. 99), Highway 217 and 1-5. This zoning district permits a wide range of uses including major retail goods and services, business/professional offices, civic uses and housing; the latter includes multi-family housing at a maximum density of 25 units/acre, equivalent to the R-25 zoning district. APPLICABLE REVIEW CRITERIA: Community Development Code Chapters 18.360, 18.390, 18.520, 18.620, 18.705, 18.725, 18.745, 18.755, 18.765, 18.780, 18.790, 18.795 and 18.810. Attached are the Site Plan, Vicinity Map and Applicant's Materials for your review. From information supplied by various departments and agencies and from other information available to our staff, a report and recommendation will be prepared and a decision will be rendered on the proposal in the near future. If you wish to comment on this application, WE NEED YOUR COMMENTS BACK BY: OCTOBER 28, 2003. You may use the space provided below or attach a separate letter to return your comments. If you are unable to respond by the above date, please phone the staff contact noted above with your comments and confirm your comments in writing as soon as possible. If you have any questions, contact the Tigard Planning Division, 13125 SW Hall Boulevard, Tigard, OR 97223. PLEASE CHECK THE FOLLOWING ITEMS THAT APPLY: _ We have reviewed the proposal and have no objections to it. _ Please contact of our office. _ Please refer to the enclosed letter. Written comments provided below: Name & Number of Person Commenting: CITY ' TIGARD REQUEST FOR CO/ ENTS NOTIFICATION LIST FOR LAND USE & COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT APPLICATIONS FILE NOS.: -s17�-Z93 • 5 FILE NAME: --1 CITIZEN INVOLVEMENT TEAMS ` 14-DAY PENDING APPLICATION NOTICE TO CIT AREA: ❑Central ti ast ['South ['West t7Proposal Descrip. in Library CIT Book CITY OFFICES J ONG RANGE PLANNING/Barbara Shields,Planning Mgr. _COMMUNITY DVLPMNT.DEPT./Planning-Engineering Techs. POLICE DEPT./Jim Wolf,Crime Prevention Officer BUILDING DIVISION/Gary Lampella,Building Official '�'c ENGINEERING DEPT./Kim McMillan,Dvipmnt.Review Engineer WATER DEPT./Dennis Koellermeier,Public Works Mgr. _CITY ADMINISTRATION/Cathy Wheatley,City Recorder _PUBLIC WORKS/John Roy,Property Manager UBLIC WORKS/Matt Stine,Urban Forester PLANNER—POST PROJECT SITE IF A PUBLIC HEARING ITEM-10 BUSINESS DAYS PRIOR TO THE PUBLIC HEARING! SPECIAL DISTRICTS _ TUAL.HILLS PARK&REC.DIST.*J TUALATIN VALLEY FIRE&RESCUE* f'CTUALATIN VALLEY WATER DISTRICT* _ CLEANWATER SERVICES* Planning Manager Fire Marshall Administrative Office Lee Walker/SWM Program 15707 SW Walker Road Washington County Fire District PO Box 745 155 N.First Avenue Beaverton,OR 97006 (place in pick-up box) Beaverton,OR 97075 Hillsboro,OR 97124 LOCAL AND STATE JURISDICTIONS CITY OF BEAVERTON * _ CITY OF TUALATIN * _OR.DEPT.OF FISH&WILDLIFE OR.DIV.OF STATE LANDS Planning Manager Planning Manager 2501 SW First Avenue Jennifer Goodridge _ Irish Bunnell,Devebpment Services 18880 SW Martinazzi Avenue PO Box 59 775 Summer Street NE PO Box 4755 Tualatin,OR 97062 Portland,OR 97207 Salem,OR 97301-1279 Beaverton,OR 97076 DLOR.PUB.UTILITIES COMM. METRO-LAND USE&PLANNING * _OR.DEPT.OF GEO.&MINERAL IND. 550 Capitol Street NE CITY OF DURHAM * 600 NE Grand Avenue 800 NE Oregon Street,Suite 5 Salem,OR 97310-1380 City Manager Portland,OR 97232-2736 Portland,OR 97232 PO Box 23483 _ Bob Knight,Data Resource Center(ZCA) _US ARMY CORPS.OF ENG. Durham,OR 97281-3483 _ Paulette Allen,Growth Management Coordinator _OR.DEPT.OF LAND CONSERV.&DVLP. Kathryn Harris Mel Huie,Greenspaces Coordinator(CPA/ZOA) Larry French(Comp.Plan Amendments Only) Routing CENWP-OP-G _CITY OF KING CITY * _ Jennifer Budhabhatti,Regional Planner(Wetlands) 635 Capitol Street NE,Suite 150 PO Box 2946 City Manager C.D. Manager,Growth Management Services Salem,OR 97301-2540 Portland,OR 97208-2946 15300 SW 116th Avenue King City,OR 97224 WASHINGTON COUNTY * OR.DEPT.OF ENERGY(Powenines in Area) _OR.DEPT OF AVIATION(Monopole Towers) Dept.of Land Use&Transp. Bonneville Power Administration Tom Highland,Planning 155 N. First Avenue CITY OF LAKE OSWEGO * Routing TTRC–Attn: Renae Ferrera 3040 25th Street,SE Suite 350,MS 13 Planning Director PO Box 3621 Salem,OR 97310 Hillsboro,OR 97124 PO Box 369 Portland,OR 97208-3621 Brent Curtis(CPA) Lake Oswego,OR 97034 _Gregg Leion(cPA) _ OR.DEPT.OF ENVIRON.QUALITY(DEQ) ODOT,REGION 1 * _Anne LaMountain(IGA/URB) _CITY OF PORTLAND (Notify for Wetlands and Potential Environmental Impacts) b<lvvlarah Danielson,Development Review Coordinator _Phil Healy(IGA/l1RB) Planning Bureau Director Regional Administrator _Carl Toland, Right-of-Way Section(vacations) ,k.Steve Conway(General Apps) 1900 SW 41h Avenue,Suite 4100 2020 SW Fourth Avenue,Suite 400 123 NW Flanders Sr.Cartographer(cPA/ZCA)MS to Portland,OR 97201 Portland,OR 97201-4987 Portland,OR 97209-4037 _Jim Nims(zcA)Ms 1s Doria Mateja(zcA)MS 14 _WA.CO.CONSOLIDATED COMMUNIC.AGENCY(WCCCA)"911"(Monopole Towers) _ODOT,REGION 1 -DISTRICT 2A * Dave Austin Jane Estes,Permit Speciaist PO Box 6375 5440 SW Westgate Drive,Suite 350 Beaverton,OR 97007-0375 Portland,OR 97221-2414 UTILITY PROVIDERS AND SPECIAL AGENCIES PORTLAND WESTERN R/R,BURLINGTON NORTHERN/SANTA FE R/R,OREGON ELECTRIC RJR(Burlington Northern/Santa Fe R/R Predecessor) — Robert I. Melbo,President&General Manager 110 W. 10th Avenue Albany,OR 97321 SOUTHERN PACIFIC TRANS.CO.R/R _METRO AREA COMMUNICATIONS _COMCAST CABLE CORP. �TRI-MET TRANSIT DVLPMT. Clifford C.Cabe,Construction Engineer Debra Palmer(Annexations Only) Randy Bice s..Maptw Area Cowed/ (If Project is Within'0 Mile of a Transit Route) 5424 SE McLoughlin Boulevard Twin Oaks Technology Center 14200 SW Brigadoon Court Ben Baldwin,Project Planner Portland,OR 97232 1815 NW 169th Place,S-6020 Beaverton,OR 97005 710 NE Holladay Street Beaverton,OR 97006-4886 Portland,OR 97232 "PORTLAND GENERAL ELECTRIC NNW NATURAL GAS COMPANY _VERIZON QWEST COMMUNICATIONS Ken Gutierrez,Svc.Design Consultant Scott Palmer,Engineering Coord. Ken Perdue,Engineering Patty Stambaugh.Engineering 9480 SW Boeckman Road 220 NW Second Avenue PO Box 1100 8021 SW Capitol Hill Rd,Rm 110 Wilsonville,OR 97070 Portland,OR 97209-3991 Beaverton,OR 97075-1100 Portland,OR 97219 —TIGARD/TUALATIN SCHOOL DIST.#23J_BEAVERTON SCHOOL DIST.#48 _COMCAST CABLE CORP. X COMCAST CABLE CORP. Marsha Butler,Administrative Offices Jan Youngquist,Demographics Alex Silantiev(see My rw A..Conte., Diana Carpenter(AGV.E over5Na99w) 6960 SW Sandburg Street 16550 SW Merlo Road 9605 SW Nimbus Avenue, Bldg. 12 3500 SW Bond Street Tigard,OR 97223-8039 Beaverton,OR 97006-5152 Beaverton,OR 97008 Portland,OR 97232 * INDICATES AUTOMATIC NOTIFICATION IN COMPLIANCE WITH INTERGOVERNMENTAL AGREEMENT IF WITHIN 500'OF THE SUBJECT PROPERTY FOR ANY/ALL CITY PROJECTS (Project Planner Is Responsible For Indicating Parties To Notify). h:\patty\masters\Request For Comments Notification Lisl.doc (UPDATED: 17-Jul-03) (Also update:"i1curpin\selupdabels\annexation_utilities and franchises.doc"when updating this document) MAILING RECORDS AFFIDAVIT OF MAILING CITYOFTIGARD Community Development Shaping Better Community I, Patricia L. Lun ford' being first duly sworn/affirm, on oath depose and say that I am a Senior Administrative Specialist for the City of Tigard, 'Washington County, Oregon and that I served the following: {Check Appropriate Box(s)Below) © NOTICE OF DECISION FOR: SDR2003-00008/MINUTEMAN PRESS El AMENDED NOTICE (File No./Name Reference) ® City of Tigard Planning Director A copy of the said notice being hereto attached, marked Exhibit"A", and by reference made a part hereof, was mailed to each named person(s) at the address(s) shown on the attached list(s), marked Exhibit"B", and by reference made a part hereof, on November 25,2003,and deposited in the United States Mail on November 25,2003, postage prepaid. I hA .II6L A (Person thar•ared Noti•-) / STATE OT roar ) County_ ff'W° t gton )ss. , City of Tigard ) Subscribed and sworn/affix ed before me on the , '� day of bee'( / , 2003. OFFICIAL SEAL ,. / y J BENGTSON () `�', NOTARY PUBLIC-OREGON ( COMMISSION NO.368086 1 MY COMMISSION EXPIRES APR.27,2007 ) NOTARY PUBLIC OF 0 'EGON My Commission Expires: 7 EXHIBIT A NOTICE OF TYPE II DECISION A SITE DEVELOPMENT Rpm* sok 2003-00008 CITY OF TIGARD MINUTES PRESS Community LDeve&opment Shaping Better Community 120 DAYS = 2/5/2004 SECTION I. APPLICATION SUMMARY FILE NAME: MINUTEMAN PRESS CASE NO.: Site Development Review (SDR) SDR2003-00008 PROPOSAL: The applicant is requesting Site Development Review approval to construct a 7,250 square foot commercial office building and associated site improvements. A 1,673 square foot residence currently occupies the site and is proposed to be removed. APPLICANT: Bob Davidson OWNER: John & Marjorie Joens Minuteman Press PMB 130 14285 SW Pacific Highway 944 Vetrans Way, #105 Tigard, OR 97224 Redmond, OR 97756 APPLICANT'S Rory Antis REP.: Gray Purcell, Inc. PO Box 23516 Portland, OR 97281-3516 LOCATION: 7545 SW Hermoso Way; WCTM 2S101AB, Tax Lot 1501. ZONE: MUE; Mixed Use Employment. The MUE zoning district is designed to apply to a majority of the land within the Tigard Triangle, a regional mixed-use employment district bounded by Pacific Highway (HWY. 99), Highway 217 and 1-5. This zoning district permits a wide range of uses including major retail goods and services, business/professional offices, civic uses and housing; the latter includes multi-family housing at a maximum density of 25 units/acre, equivalent to the R-25 zoning district. APPLICABLE REVIEW Community Development Code Chapters 18.360, 18.390, 18.520, CRITERIA: 18.620, 18.705, 18.725, 18.745, 18.755, 18.765, 18.780, 18.790, 18.795 and 18.810. SECTION II. DECISION Notice is hereby given that,t etity of Tigard,Community DevelopmentDirector's designee has APPROVED the above regtest'SUibject to c rtain`conditions of"approval. The findings and conclusions on which the decision;is based are noted in Section VI. NOTICE OF TYPE II DECISION SDR2003-00008/MINUTEMAN PRESS PAGE 1 OF 28 CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL THE f" LL..QwIN QNpITIONS4SHALL BE SATISFIED.: PRIOR To SS C 9F SfTE!BUtL INC PERIVIITS. Submit evidence of complying w, h the fo rtowing conditions to the Planning Division. Staff contact: Mathew Scheidegger at 503-639-4171, ext. 2437. 1 . Provide a plan showing the proposed building to be setback from SW Hermoso Way no greater than 10 feet and construct accordingly. 2. Provide a plan showing the front façade to include a minimum of 50 percent ground floor windows, display areas, or doorway openings and construct accordingly. 3. Submit information indicating that the Red Maples to be planted within the front yard setback will be a minimum of three and a half inch caliper and plant accordingly. 4. Provide sign dimensions, plans, and a City of Tigard sign application to the Planning Technicians at the planning counter located in City Hall, for the proposed wall sign. 5. The applicant's engineer shall provide a pre-construction sight distance certification and/or correct existing deficiencies. 6. Provide a plan showing the proposed parking lot with a minimum of 19 parking stalls and construct accordingly. 7. Prior to site work, the applicant must install all tree protection measures and contact the City's Forester and a member of the Planning Staff for sign-off. Submit to the Engineering Department (Kim McMillan, 639-4171, ext. 2642) for review and approval: 8. Prior to issuance of a site permit, a Public Facility Improvement (PFI) permit is required for this project to cover the half-street improvements in Hermoso Way and any other work in the public right-of-way (ROW). Eight (8) sets of detailed public improvement plans shall be submitted for review to the Engineering Department. NOTE: these plans are in addition to any drawings required by the Building Division and should only include sheets relevant to public improvements. Public Facility Improvement (PFI) permit plans shall conform to City of Tigard Public Improvement Design Standards, which are available at City Hall and the City's web page (www.ci.tigard.or.us). 9. The PFI permit plan submittal shall include the exact legal name, address and telephone number of the individual or corporate entity o will be designated as the "Permittee", and who will provide the financial assurance for the public improvements. For example, specify if the entity is a corporation, limited partnership, LLC, etc. Also specify the state within which the entity is incorporated and provide the name of the corporate contact person. Failure to provide accurate information to the Engineering Department will delay processing of project documents. 10. The applicant shall provide a construction vehicle access and parking plan for approval by the City Engineer. The purpose of this plan is for parking and traffic control during the public improvement construction phase. All construction vehicle parking shall be provided on-site. No construction vehicles or equipment will be permitted to park on the adjoining residential public streets. Construction vehicles include the vehicles of any contractor or subcontractor involved in the construction of site improvements or buildings proposed by this application, and shall include the vehicles of all suppliers and employees associated with the project. 11. Prior to issuance of the Site Permit, the applicant shall pay an addressing fee in the amount of$50.00. (STAFF CONTACT: Shirley Treat, Engineering). 12. Additional right-of-way shall be dedicated to the Public along the frontage of SW Hermoso Way to increase the right-of-way to 30 feet from the centerline. The description shall be tied to the existing right-of-way centerline. The dedication document shall be on City forms. Instructions are available from the Engineering Department. NOTICE OF TYPE II DECISION SDR2003-00008/MINUTEMAN PRESS PAGE 2 OF 28 13. The applicant shall submit construction plans to the Engineering Department as a part of the Public Facility Improvement permit, which indicate that they will construct a half-street improvement along the frontage of SW Hermoso Way. The improvements adjacent to this site shall include: A. City standard pavement section for a local street from curb to centerline equal to 18 feet; B. pavement tapers needed to tie the new improvement back into the existing edge of pavement shall be built beyond the site frontage; C. concrete curb, or curb and gutter as needed; D. storm drainage, including any off-site storm drainage necessary to convey surface and/or subsurface runoff; E. 6 foot concrete sidewalk with a planter strip, F. street trees in the planter strip spaced per TDC requirements; G. street striping; H. streetlight layout by applicant's engineer, to be approved by City Engineer; underground utilities; J. street signs (if applicable); K. driveway apron (if applicable); and L. adjustments in vertical and/or horizontal alignment to construct SW Hermoso Way in a safe manner, as approved by the Engineering Department. 14. A profile of Hermoso Way shall be required, extending 300 feet either side of the subject site showing the existing grade and proposed future grade. 15. The applicant shall obtain approval from the Tualatin Valley Water District (TVWD) for the proposed water connection prior to issuance of the City's Public Facility Improvement permit. 16. The applicant shall provide an on-site water quality facility as required by Clean Water Services Design and Construction Standards (adopted by Resolution and Order No. 00-7). Final plans and calculations shall be submitted to the Engineering Department (Kim McMillan) for review and approval prior to issuance of the site permit. In addition, a proposed maintenance plan shall be submitted along with the plans and calculations for review and approval. 17. The applicant's water quality/quantity facility shall include design of the 2, 10 and 25 year storms. The plans shall also include the engineer's proposed revisions to the outfall, as outlined in his correspondence dated 10/04/03. 18. An erosion control plan shall be provided as part of the Public Facility Improvement (PFI) permit drawings. The plan shall conform to the "Erosion Prevention and Sediment Control Design and Planning Manual, February 2003 edition." 19. Prior to issuance of the site permit, the applicant shall pay the current assessment for this site as it pertains to Sewer Reimbursement District No. 15. STAFF CONTACT: Greg Berry, Utility Engineer, (503) 639-4171, ext. 2468. 20. The applicant's PFI submittal shall include the extension of the public storm sewer in Hermoso Way. THE FOLLOWING CONDITIONS SHALL BE SATISFIED PRIOR TO A FINAL BUILDING INSPECTION: Submit to the Planning Department (Mathew Scheidegger, 639-4171, ext. 2437) for review and approval: 21. Provide information regarding the size of the fence and type of landscaping to be used to screen the proposed refuse container. 22. Provide documentation that the franchise hauler for the area is satisfied that the design of the refuse container area is compatible with waste pick up practices. NOTICE OF TYPE II DECISION SDR2003-00008/MINUTEMAN PRESS PAGE 3 OF 28 23. The applicant is required to provide all internal parking stalls along the proposed sidewalk with wheel stops. 24. Provide a 4-stall bicycle rack within 50 feet of the west entrance. 25. Provide directional signs back to the required bicycle rack. 26. Submit details of the bicycle rack to be used. 27. Provide information verifying that the proposed shrubbery located on the southern property line will not grow within the required visual clearance triangle area or trim according to the standard. 28. Submit a detailed lighting plan to the Tigard Police Department and the Tigard Planning Department for review. 29. Provide a tree mitigation plan for 134-inches and implement accordingly. Submit to the Engineering Department (Kim McMillan, 639-4171, ext. 2642) for review and approval: 30. The applicant's engineer shall provide a post construction sight distance certification and/or correct existing deficiencies. 31. Prior to a final building inspection, the applicant shall complete the required public improvements, obtain conditional acceptance from the City, and provide a one-year maintenance assurance for said improvements. 32. Prior to a final building inspection, the applicant shall provide the City with as-built drawings of the public improvements as follows: 1) 3 mil mylar, 2) a diskette of the as- builts in "DWG" format, if available; otherwise "DXF" will be acceptable, and 3) the as- built drawings shall be tied to the City's GPS network. The applicant's engineer shall provide the City with an electronic file with points for each structure (manholes, catch basins, water valves, hydrants and other water system features) in the development, and their respective X and Y State Plane Coordinates, referenced to NAD 83 (91). 33. The applicant shall either place the existing overhead utility lines along SW Hermoso Way underground as a part of this project, or they shall pay the fee in-lieu of undergrounding. The fee shall be calculated by the frontage of the site that is parallel to the utility lines and will be $35.00 per lineal foot. If the fee option is chosen, the amount will be $4,375.00 and it shall be paid prior to the final building inspection. 34. To ensure compliance with Clean Water Services design and construction standards, the applicant shall employ the design engineer responsible for the design and specifications of the private water quality facility to perform construction and visual observation of the water quality facility for compliance with the design and specifications. These inspections shall be made at significant stages, and at completion of the construction. Prior to final building inspection, the design engineer shall provide the City of Tigard (Inspection Supervisor) with written confirmation that the water quality facility is in compliance with the design and specifications. Staff Contact: Hap Watkins, Building Division. 35. Thg Trip Generation funds for the intersections of SW 72nd/Dartmouth and SW 68t /Dartmouth must be paid prior to a final building inspection. THIS APPROVAL SHALL BE VALID FOR EIGHTEEN (18) MONTHS FROM THE EFFECTIVE DATE OF THIS DECISION. SECTION III. BACKGROUND INFORMATION Site History: Staff conducted a search of City records for the Tax Map 2S101AB, Tax Lot 1501. Based on this search, no other land-use cases were found. NOTICE OF TYPE II DECISION SDR2003-00008/MINUTEMAN PRESS PAGE 4 OF 28 Vicinity Information: The subject site is located on the west side of SW Hermoso Way. The site is bordered on three sides by property zoned Mixed Use Employment (MUE) and General Commercial (C-G) to the north. The property to the south has recently received site development review approval for a 1,808 square foot law office (SDR2003-00007). Site Information and Proposal Description: The applicant is requesting Site Development Review approval to construct a 7,250 square foot commercial office building and associated site improvements. A 1,673 square foot residence currently occupies the site and is proposed to be removed. SECTION IV. COMMENTS FROM PROPERTY OWNERS WITHIN 500 FEET One neighbor provided comments regarding the proposed subdivision. The concerns of the neighbor are as follows: With the increased traffic on Beveland and the addition of Minuteman Press, the City may want to consider paying for the remaining sidewalk that is needed to help keep these people out of harm's way. RESPONSE: The Minute Man Press site will be required to complete a half-street improvement which will include a sidewalk. However, the City cannot hold applicant's responsible to construct sidewalks along frontages of neighboring properties. Those properties that do not have sidewalks will be required to provide sidewalks at time of development. SECTION V. SUMMARY OF APPLICABLE REVIEW CRITERIA A. Tigard Triangle Design Standards Street Connectivity Site Design Standards Building Design Standards Signs Landscaping and Screening B. Additional Applicable Development Code Standards 18.705 Access Egress and Circulation) 18.725 Environmental Performance Standards) 18.745 Landscaping and Screening) 18.755 Mixed Solid Waste and Recyclable Storage) 18.765 Off-Street parking and loading requirements) 18.780 Signs) 18.790 Tree Removal) 18.795 Visual Clearance) C. Specific DR Approval Criteria 18.360 D. Street and Utility Improvement Standards 18.810 E. Impact Study 18.390 SECTION VI. APPLICABLE DEVELOPMENT CODE STANDARDS A. ZONING DISTRICT Commercial Zoning District: Section 18.520.020 Lists the description of the Commercial Zoning Districts. The site is located in the MUE zoning district: Mixed-Use Employment. NOTICE OF TYPE II DECISION SDR2003-00008/MINUTEMAN PRESS PAGE 5 OF 28 Development Standards: Section 18.52O.O4O.B States that Development standards in Commercial Zoning Districts are contained in Table 18.520.2 below: TABLE 18.520.2 DEVELOPMENT STANDARDS IN COMMERCIAL ZONES STANDARD MUE Proposed Minimum Lot Size None 18,182 sq.ft. Minimum Lot Width 50 ft. 125 ft. Minimum Setbacks -Front yard Oft[11] 15 ft. -Side facing street on corner&through lots[1] - - -Side yard 0/20 ft[8] 5 ft. --Rear yard 0/20 ft[8] 95 ft. -Distance between front of garage&property line abutting a public or private street. - - Minimum Building Height N/A N/A Maximum Height 45 ft 40 ft. Maximum Site Coverage[2] 85% 68% Minimum Landscape Requirement 15% 31.91% Minimum FAR .40 .39 Minimum Residential Density[4][5][6] N/A N/A Maximum Residential Density N/A N/A 1]The provisions of Chapter 18.795(Vision Clearance)must be satisfied. [2]Includes all buildings and impervious surfaces. [4] Notwithstanding the requirements of Section 18.715.020,minimum and maximum density shall be determined for residential only projects using the number of residential units per acre shown in the above table. The provisions for density transfer described in Section 18.715.030.B apply, using the minimum and maximum density shown in the above table.Any mixed-use or commercial only development does not have a minimum density requirement. [5]For purposes of determining floor area ratio and residential densities,the net development area shall be uses to establish the lot area,determined per Section 18.715.020.A. [6] Adjustments to minimum density in the Washington Square Regional center area subject to the standards set forth in Section 18.630.020.E. [8] No setback shall be required except 20 feet shall be required where the zone abuts a residential zoning district. [11]There shall be no minimum front yard setback requirement; however,conditions in Chapters 18.745 and 18.795 must be met. As demonstrated in the table above, the applicant's plans comply with the dimensional standards of the MUE zone. FINDING: Based on the analysis above, the Development Standards criteria have been satisfied. A. TRIANGLE DESIGN STANDARDS (18.620): Design standards for public street improvements and for new development and renovation projects have been prepared for the Tigard Triangle. These design standards address several important guiding principals adopted for the Tigard Triangle, including creating a high-quality mixed use employment area, providing a convenient pedestrian and bikeway system within the Triangle, and utilizing streetscape to create a high quality image for the area. All new developments are expected to contribute to the character and quality of the area. In addition to meeting the design standards described below and other development standards required by the Development and Building Codes, developments will be required to dedicate and improve public streets, connect to public facilities such as sanitary sewer, water and storm drainage, and participate in funding future transportation and public improvement projects necessary within the Tigard Triangle. The following design standards apply to all development located within the Tigard Triangle. If a standard found in this section conflicts with another standard in the Development Code, standards in this section shall govern. NOTICE OF TYPE II DECISION SDR2003-00008/MINUTEMAN PRESS PAGE 6 OF 28 The criteria may be adjusted if the adjustment approval criteria, which are found in Section 18.620.090.C.1-4, have been met. The criteria provides that an adjustment may be ranted if granting the adjustment will continue to meet the purpose of the standar s) to be modified-in an acceptable alternative manner; and the proposal will not signi icantl detract from the livability or appearance of an area and the proposal will be consistent with the desired character of the area; and if more than one adjustment is being requested, the cumulative effect of the adjustments as well as each individual adjustment results in a project which is still consistent with the overall purpose, goals and standards of the zone• and granting the adjustment is the minimum necessary to allow the proposed use of the site; and any impacts resulting from the adjustment are mitigated to the extent practicable. Street Connectivity: All development must demonstrate how one (1) of the following standard options will be met. Variance of these standards may be approved per the requirements of Chapter 18.134 where topography, barriers such as railroads or freeways, or environmental constraints such as major streams and rivers prevent street extensions and connections. Design Option: a. Local street spacing shall provide public street connections at intervals of no more than 660 feet; b. Bike and pedestrian connections on public easements or right-of-way shall be provided at intervals of no more than 330 feet. Performance Option: a. Local street spacing shall occur at intervals of no less than eight (8) street intersections per mile; b. The shortest vehicle trip over public streets from a local origin to a collector or greater facility is no more than twice the straight-line distance; c. The shortest pedestrian trip on public right-of-way from a local origin to a collector or greater facility is no more than one and one-half the straight-line distance. There are no opportunities for additional street intersections with this proposal. The project lies directly between two intersections that are approximately 340 feet apart. The shortest vehicle and pedestrian trip to SW 72nd Avenue is approximately 860 feet. The straight-line distance to SW 72r'd Avenue is approximately 760 feet. Therefore, the standard is satisfied. Site Design Standards: All development must meet the following site design standards. If a parcel is one (1) acre or larger a phased development plan must be approved demonstrating how these standards for the overall parcel can be met. Variance to these standards may be granted if the criteria found in Section 18.370.010C2 (Criteria for Granting a Variance) is satisfied. The subject site is less than one acre in size and the applicant has not proposed to develop the site in phases. Therefore, this standard does not apply. Building Placement On Major And Minor Arterials And The Street: Buildings shall occupy a minimum of 50 percent of all street frontages along Major and Minor Arterial Streets. Buildings shall be located at public street intersections on Major and Minor Arterial Streets. The subject site fronts on SW Hermoso Way, a local street. Therefore, this standard does not apply. Building Setback: The minimum building setback from public street rights-of-way or dedicated wetlands/buffers and other environmental features, shall be 0 feet; the maximum building setback shall be 10 feet. The applicant shows the proposed building to have a 15-foot front yard setback from SW Hermoso Way. The above standard requires a maximum setback of 10 feet. Therefore, the applicant is required to provide a plan showing the proposed building to setback from SW Hermoso Way no greater than 10 feet and construct accordingly. NOTICE OF TYPE II DECISION SDR2003-00008/MINUTEMAN PRESS PAGE 7 OF 28 Front Yard Setback Design: Landscaping, an arcade, or a hard-surfaced expansion of the pedestrian path must be provided between a structure and a public street or accessway. If a building abuts more than one (1) street, the required improvements shall be provided on all streets. Landscaping shall be developed to an L-1 standard on public streets and an L-2 standard on accessways. Hard-surfaced areas shall be constructed with scored concrete or modular paving materials. Benches and other street furnishings are encouraged. These areas shall contribute to the minimum landscaping requirement per Section 18.620.070. The landscape plan indicates that a combination of landscaping and a concrete walk will be located between the building and SW Hermoso Way. The proposed landscaping consists of four Red Maple trees, a combination of low lying shrubs, and grass for ground cover. The proposed landscaping meets the L-1 landscaping requirement; however, Staff cannot confirm that the Red Maples will be planted at a minimum of three and a half inch caliper. Therefore, the applicant will need to submit information indicating that the Red Maples to be planted within the front yard setback will be a minimum of three and a half inch caliper. Walkway Connection To Building Entrances: A walkway connection is required between the building's entrance and the public street or accessway providing access to the property. This walkway must be at least six (6) feet wide and be paved with scored concrete or modular paving materials. Building entrances at a corner near a public street intersection are encouraged. These areas shall contribute to the minimum landscaping requirement per Section 18.620.070. The applicant's plan shows an 8-foot-wide sidewalk will be provided from the east entrance to SW Hermoso Way. Therefore, this criterion has been satisfied. Parking Location And Landscape Design: Parking for buildings or phases adjacent to public street rights-of-way must be located to the side or rear of newly constructed buildings. If located on the side, parking is limited to 50% of the street frontage and must be behind a landscaped area constructed to an L-1 Landscape Standard. The minimum depth of the L-1 landscaped area is five feet or is equal to the building setback, whichever is greater. Interior side and rear yards shall be landscaped to an L-2 Landscape Standard, except where a side yard abuts a public street, where it shall be landscaped to an L-1 Landscape Standard. The building is oriented to the front of the lot abutting SW Hermoso Way. The parking lot is located on the west side of the building which is the rear of the proposed building. The parking area occupies a total of 19 percent of the street frontage and is screened with a landscape area equal to the L-1 landscaping standard. Therefore, this standard has been met. Building Design Standards: All non-residential buildings shall comply with the following design standards. Variance to these standards may be granted if the criteria found in Section 18.370.010 (Criteria for Granting a Variance) is satisfied. Ground Floor Windows: All street-facing elevations within the Building Setback (0 to 10 feet) along public streets shall include a minimum of 50 percent of the ground floor wall area with windows, display areas or doorway openings. The ground floor wall area shall be measured from three (3) feet above grade to nine (9) feet above grade the entire width of the street-facing elevation. The ground floor window requirement shall be met within the ground floor wall area and for glass doorway openings to ground level. Up to 50 percent of the ground floor window requirement may be met on an adjoining elevation as long as all of the requirement is located at a building corner. According to the standard above, the building must have at a minimum, 50 percent of the ground floor wall area windows or display areas or doorway openings within the 0-10 foot setback. The applicant has indicated that 31% of the front façade is windows and entrances. Therefore, the applicant must provide and construct a plan showing the front façade to include a minimum of 50 percent ground floor windows, display areas, or doorway openings. NOTICE OF TYPE II DECISION SDR2003-00008/MINUTEMAN PRESS PAGE 8 OF 28 Building Facades: Facades that face a public street shall extend no more than 50 feet without providing at least one (1) of the following features: (a) a variation in building materials; (b) a building off-set of at least 1-foot; (c) a wall area that is entirely separated from other wall areas by a rojection, such as an arcade; or (d) by another design features that reflect the buildings structural system. No building facade shall extend for more than 300 feet without a pedestrian connection between or through the building. The east façade facing SW Hermoso Way is approximately 80 feet in length, which requires one architectural feature according to the standard above. The main entrance will be used as the building off-set. Therefore, this standard has been satisfied. Weather Protection: Weather protection for pedestrians, such as awnings, canopies, and arcades, shall be provided at building entrances. Weather protection is encouraged along building frontages abutting a public sidewalk or a hard-surfaced expansion of a sidewalk, and along building frontages between a building entrance and a public street or accessway. Awnings and canopies shall not be backlit. The plans show the main entrance as well as the secondary entrance at the west end of the building to be covered. Therefore, this standard is satisfied. Building Materials: Plain concrete block, plain concrete, corrugated metal, plywood, sheet pressboard or vinyl siding may not be used as exterior finish materials. Foundation material may be plain concrete or plain concrete block where the foundation material is not revealed for more than 2 feet. The exterior of the building will be a combination of lap siding and brick. No plain concrete walls have been proposed. Therefore, this standard has been satisfied. Roofs And Roof Lines: Except in the case of a building entrance feature, roofs shall be designed as an extension of the primary materials used for the building and should respect the building's structural system and architectural style. False fronts and false roofs are not permitted. The proposed building does not have a false front or false roof, the applicant is proposing a combination of roof shapes including gables and hips, which will respect the building's architectural style. Roof-Mounted Equipment: All roof-mounted equipment must be screened from view from adjacent public streets. Satellite dishes and other communication equipment must be set back or positioned on a roof so that exposure from adjacent public streets is minimized. Solar heating panels are exempt from this standard. No roof-mounted equipment is proposed. Therefore, this standard does not apply. Signs: In addition to the requirements of Chapter 18.780 of the Development Code, the following standards shall be met: Zoning District Regulations: Non-residential development within the MUE zone shall meet the sign requirements of the C-P zone (18.780.130.D). Sign Area Limits: The maximum sign area limits found in Section 18.780.130 shall not be exceeded. No area limit increases will be permitted within the Tigard Triangle. Height Limits: The maximum height limit for all signs except wall signs shall be 10 feet. Wall signs shall not extend above the roofline of the wall on which the sign is located. No height increases will be permitted within the Tigard Triangle. NOTICE OF TYPE II DECISION SDR2003-00008/MINUTEMAN PRESS PAGE 9 OF 28 Sign Location: Freestanding signs within the Tigard Triangle shall not be permitted within required L-1 landscape areas. The applicant indicates in the narrative that a wall sign will meet the requirements of the code. However, no dimensions or plans have been submitted regarding the proposed sign. Therefore, the applicant is required to provide sign dimensions, plans, and a City of Tigard sign application to the Planning Technicians at the planning counter located in City Hall. Landscaping and Screening: Two (2) levels of landscaping and screening standards are applicable to the Tigard Triangle. The locations where the landscaping or screening is required and the depth of the landscaping or screening are defined in other sub-sections of this section. These standards are minimum requirements. Higher standards may be substituted as long as all height limitations are met. L-1 (Low Screen): For general landscaping of landscaped and screened areas within parking lots, local collectors and local streets, planting standards of Chapter 18.745 Landscaping and Screening, shall apply. The L-1 standard applies to setbacks on major and minor arterials. Where the setback is a minimum of 5 feet between the parking lot and a major or minor arterial, trees shall be planted at 31/2 inch caliper, at a maximum of 28 feet on center. Shrubs shall be of a variety that will provide a 3-foot high screen and 90 percent opacity within one (1) year. Groundcover plants must fully cover the remainder of landscape area within two (2) years. Any tree planted in excess of a 2 inch caliper shall be eligible for full mitigation credit. Parking lot landscaping is addressed later in this decision (Chapter 18.745, Landscaping and Screening). L-2 (General Landscaping): For general landscaping of landscaped and screened areas within parking lots, local collectors and local streets, planting standards of Chapter 18.745 Landscaping and Screening, shall apply. Trees shall Ipe provided at a minimum 21/2 inch caliper, at a maximum spacing of 28 feet. Shrubs shall be of a size and quality to achieve the required landscaping or screening effect within two (2) years. Any tree planted in excess of a 2 inch caliper shall be eligible for full mitigation credit. The proposed site will take access from SW Hermoso Way, a local street. The L-2 landscape standards defer to Chapter 18.745 (Landscaping and Screening) which is discussed further in this decision. FINDING: Based on the analysis above, the Tigard Triangle Design standards have not been fully met. However, if the applicant complies with the conditions below, the Triangle Design standards will be met. CONDITIONS: • Provide a plan showing the proposed building to be setback from SW Hermoso Way no greater than 10 feet and construct accordingly. • Provide a plan showing the front façade to include a minimum of 50 percent ground floor windows, display areas, or doorway openings and construct accordingly. • Submit information indicating that the Red Maples to be planted within the front yard setback will be a minimum of three and a half inch caliper and plant accordingly. • Provide sign dimensions, plans, and a City of Tigard sign application to the Planning Technicians at the planning counter located in City Hall. NOTICE OF TYPE II DECISION SDR2003-00008/MINUTEMAN PRESS PAGE 10 OF 28 B. ADDITIONAL APPLICABLE DEVELOPMENT CODE STANDARDS The Site development Review approval standards require that a development proposal be found to be consistent with the various standards of the Community Development Code. The applicable criteria in this case are Chapters 18.360, 18.370, 18.390, 18.520, 18.705, 18.745, 18.755, 18.765, 18.775, 18.780, 18.790, 18.795, and 18.810. The proposal's consistency with these Code Chapters is reviewed in the following sections. Access, Egress and Circulation (18.705): Access plan: No building or other permit shall be issued until scaled plans are presented and approved as provided by this chapter that show how access, egress and circulation requirements are to be fulfilled. The applicant shall submit a site plan. The Director shall provide the applicant with detailed information about this submission requirement. The applicant has provided plans showing access, egress, and circulation from SW Hermoso Way. Therefore, this standard has been satisfied. Joint access: Owners of two or more uses, structures, or parcels of land may agree to utilize jointly the same access and egress when the combined access and egress of both uses, structures, or parcels of land satisfies the combined requirements as designated in this title, provided: Satisfactory legal evidence shall be presented in the form of deeds, easements, leases or contracts to establish the joint use; and copies of the deeds, easements, leases or contracts are placed on permanent file with the City. Joint access has not been proposed with this application. Therefore, this standard does not apply. Public street access: All vehicular access and egress as required in Sections 18.705.030H and 18.705.0301 shall connect directly with a public or private street approved by the City for public use and shall be maintained at the required standards on a continuous basis. The proposed building is accessible from SW Hermoso Way, which will be maintained as a public street. Therefore, this criterion has been satisfied. Curb cuts: Curb cuts shall be in accordance with Section 18.810.030N: Concrete curbs, curb cuts, wheelchair, bicycle ramps and driveway approaches shall be constructed in accordance with standards specified in this chapter and Section 15.04.080: Concrete curbs and driveway approaches are required; except where no sidewalk is planned, an asphalt approach may be constructed with City Engineer approval and Asphalt and concrete driveway approaches to the property line shall be built to City configuration standards. No driveway approach shall be less than five feet from the side property line projected except in cul-de-sacs, without approval and written permission of the city. The end slopes may encroach within the five foot restricted area. No portion of any driveway approach, including the end slopes, shall be located closer than thirty feet to an intersection street right-of-way line. Commercial or service drives shall not be more than thirty feet in width and if located on the same lot frontage shall be separated by a minimum length of curb of thirty feet. Each residential driveway shall be not more than twenty-six feet in width including end slopes, and if more than one driveway is to be constructed to serve the same lot, the frontage spacing between such driveways shall be not less than thirty feet measured along the curb line. Joint access driveways shall conform to the appropriate width standard for commercial or residential type usage. The proposed site plan shows the curb cut at the entrance drive to be constructed out of concrete. The curb cut is five feet from the west property line. The curb cut is approximately 135 feet from the intersection of SW Hermoso Way and SW Beveland Street. Therefore, this criterion has been met. NOTICE OF TYPE II DECISION SDR2003-00008/MINUTEMAN PRESS PAGE 11 OF 28 Walkways: On-site pedestrian walkways shall comply with the following standards: Walkways shall extend from the ground floor entrances or from the ground floor landing of stairs, ramps, or elevators of all commercial, institutional, and industrial uses, to the streets which provide the required access and egress. Walkways shall provide convenient connections between buildings in multi-building commercial, institutional, and industrial complexes. Unless impractical, walkways shall be constructed between new and existing developments and neighboring developments; According to the plans submitted, a concrete walkway extends from the entrance on the east and west façade to the sidewalk of SW Hermoso Way. Therefore, this standard has been satisfied. Wherever required walkways cross vehicle access driveways or parking lots, such crossings shall be designed and located for pedestrian safety. Required walkways shall be physically separated from motor vehicle traffic and parking by either a minimum 6-inch vertical separation (curbed) or a minimum 3-foot horizontal separation, except that pedestrian crossings of traffic aisles are permitted for distances no greater than 36 feet if appropriate landscaping, pavement markings, or contrasting pavement materials are used. Walkways shall be a minimum of four feet in width, exclusive of vehicle overhangs and obstructions such as mailboxes, benches, bicycle racks, and sign posts, and shall be in compliance with ADA standards; No walkways have been proposed to cross the access drive or parking lot. Therefore, this standard has been satisfied. Required walkways shall be paved with hard surfaced materials such as concrete, asphalt, stone, brick, etc. Walkways may be required to be lighted and/or signed as needed for safety purposes. Soft-surfaced public use pathways may be provided only if such pathways are provided in addition to required pathways. The plan and narrative depicts the proposed sidewalk to be constructed out of concrete, which meets the standard. Access Management (Section 18.705.030.H) Section 18.765.030.H.1 states that an access report shall be submitted with all new development proposals which verifies design of driveways and streets are safe by meeting adequate stacking needs, sight distance and deceleration standards as set by ODOT, Washington County, the City and AASHTO. The applicant has indicated that visual clearance standards can be met. The applicant did not address sight distance. Therefore, the applicant's engineer shall certify prior to construction that sight distance can be met, and a post construction sight distance certification will be required to ensure that sight distance has been met. Section 18.705.030.H.2 states that driveways shall not be permitted to be placed in the influence area of collector or arterial street intersections. Influence area of intersections is that area where queues of traffic commonly form on approach to an intersection. The minimum driveway setback from a collector or arterial street intersection shall be150 feet, measured from the right-of-way line of the intersecting street to the throat of the proposed driveway. The setback may be greater depending upon the influence area, as determined from City Engineer review of a traffic impact report submitted by the applicant's traffic engineer. In a case where a project has less than 150 feet of street frontage, the applicant must explore any option for shared access with the adjacent parcel. If shared access is not possible or practical, the driveway shall be placed as far from the intersection as possible. The proposed development takes access from SW Hermoso Way, which is considered a local street. Therefore, this standard does not apply. NOTICE OF TYPE II DECISION SDR2003-00008/MINUTEMAN PRESS PAGE 12 OF 28 Section 18.705.030.H.3 and 4 states that the minimum spacing of driveways and streets along a collector shall be 200 feet. The minimum spacing of driveways and streets along an arterial shall be 600 feet. The minimum spacing of local streets along a local street shall be 125 feet. The subject site takes access from SW Hermoso Way, which considered a local street. Therefore, this standard does not apply. Minimum Access Requirements for Commercial and Industrial Use: Section 18.705.030.1 rovides the minimum access requirements for commercial and industrial uses: Table 18.705.3 indicates that the required access width for developments with 0-99 parking spaces is one 30-foot accesses with 24 feet of pavement. Vehicular access shall be provided to commercial or industrial uses, and shall be located to within 50 feet of the primary ground floor entrances; additional requirements for truck traffic may be placed as conditions of site development review. The development has one point of access into the parking lot that is 30 feet in width and provides 25 feet of pavement. Therefore, this standard has been satisfied. FINDING: Based on the analysis above, the Access, Egress and Circulation standards have not been fully met. However, if the applicant complies with the condition listed below, the standards will be fully met. CONDITIONS: • The applicant's engineer shall provide a pre-construction sight distance certification and/or correct existing deficiencies. • The applicant's engineer shall provide a post construction sight distance certification and/or correct existing deficiencies. ENVIRONMENTAL PERFORMANCE STANDARDS (18.725): Noise: For the purposes of noise regulation, the provisions of Sections 7.40.130 through 7.40.210 of the Tigard Municipal Code shall apply. Visible emissions: Within the commercial zoning districts and the industrial park (IP) zoning district, there shall be no use, operation or activity which results in a stack of other point- source emission from space heating, or the emission of pure uncombined water (steam) which is visible from a ropert- line. Department of Environmental Quality (DEQ) rules for visible emissions (340- 21-015 and 340-28-070) apply. Vibration: No vibration other than that caused by highway vehicles, trains and aircraft is permitted in any given zoning district which is discernible without instruments at the property line of the use concerned. Odors: The emission of odorous gases or other matter in such quantities as to be readily detectable at any point beyond the property line of the use creating the odors is prohibited. DEQ rules for odors (340-028-090) apply. Glare and heat: No direct or sky-reflected glare, whether from floodlights or from high temperature processes such as combustion or welding, which is visible at the lot line shall be permitted and; there shall be no emission or transmission of heat or heated air which is discernible at the lot line of the source; and these regulations shall not apply to signs or floodlights in parking areas or constructing equipment at the time of construction or excavation work otherwise permitted by this title. NOTICE OF TYPE II DECISION SDR2003-00008/MINUTEMAN PRESS PAGE 13 OF 28 Insects and rodents: All materials including wastes shall be stored and all grounds shall be maintained in a manner which will not attract or aid the propagation of insects or rodents or create a health hazard. The proposed use is office, which is an outright permitted use within the MUE zoning district. There is no indication within the application that these standards will not be met. However, ongoing efforts to meet these standards shall be maintained and any violation of these standards will be addressed by the City of Tigard's Code Enforcement Officer. FINDING: Based on the above, there is no evidence the Environmental Performance Standards will not be met. LANDSCAPING AND SCREENING (18.745): Street Trees: Section 18.745.040 states that all development projects fronting on a public street or a private drive more than 100 feet in length shall be required to plant street trees in accordance with Section 18.745.040.0 Section 18.745.040.0 requires that street trees be spaced between 20 and 40 feet apart depending on the size classification of the tree at maturity (small, medium or large). The site plan shows four Columnar Red Maple street trees along SW Hermoso Way. The street trees fall into the large-sized tree category of the standard above and can be spaced no more than 40 feet apart. The site plan shows the trees to be planted at a spacing of 24-30 feet apart. Therefore, this criterion has been satisfied. Buffering and Screening: Section 18.745.080 states that no buffer is required between abutting uses that are of a different type when the uses are separated by a street. No buffer is required between a proposed office use and existing office use. All properties surrounding the subject property are zoned MUE except for the abutting property to the north which is zoned C-G. Therefore, no buffering or screening is required. Screening: Special Provisions: Section 18.745.050.E requires the screening of parking and loading areas. Landscaped parking areas shall include special design features which effectively screen the parking lot areas from view. Planting materials to be installed should achieve a relative balance between low lying and vertical shrubbery and trees. Trees shall be planted in landscaped islands in all parking areas, and shall be equally distributed on the basis of one (1) tree for each seven (7) parking spaces in order to provide a canopy effect. The minimum dimension on the landscape islands shall be three (3) feet wide and the landscaping shall be protected from vehicular damage by some form of wheel guard or curb. The parking area is screened to the north and south with a five to eight foot landscaped area, containing a combination of low lying and vertical shrubbery. The west property line is screened with a 20-foot grass swale and an existing arborvitae hedge. According to the above standard, the applicant is required to plant one parking lot tree for every seven spaces. The parking along the western lot line contains 10 parking stalls. The applicant has proposed to plant three Little Leaf Linden trees at the edge of the grass swale in order to shade the parking area. Therefore, this standard has been satisfied. Screening Of Service Facilities. Except for one-family and two-family dwellings, any refuse container or disposal area and service facilities such as gas meters and air conditioners which would otherwise be visible from a public street, customer or resident parking area, any public facility or any residential area shall be screened from view by placement of a solid wood fence or masonry wall between five and eight feet in height. All refuse materials shall be contained within the screened area; The screening of the proposed refuse container is conditioned below. The plans submitted do not indicate that service facilities will be visible from SW Hermoso Way or the proposed parking lot. Therefore, this standard has been satisfied. NOTICE OF TYPE II DECISION SDR2003-00008/MINUTEMAN PRESS PAGE 14 OF 28 Screening Of Refuse Containers. Except for one- and two-family dwellings, any refuse container or refuse collection area which would be visible from a public street, parking lot, residential or commercial area, or any public facility such as a school or park shall be screened or enclosed from view by placement of a solid wood fence, masonry wall or evergreen hedge. All refuse shall be contained within the screened area. The submitted plans show the refuse container area will be located along the northwest property line. The applicant has indicated that the container area will be screened with a fence and landscaping. However, the applicant has not indicated the size of the fence, or the type of landscaping to be used. Therefore, the applicant is required to provide information regarding the size of the fence and type of landscaping to be used to screen the proposed refuse container. FINDING: Based on the analysis above, the landscaping and screening standards have not been met. However, if the applicant complies with the condition listed below, the standards will be fully met. CONDITION: Provide information regarding the size of the fence and type of landscaping to be used to screen the proposed refuse container. MIXED SOLID WASTE AND RECYCLABLES STORAGE (18.755): Chapter 18.T55 requires that new construction incorporates functional and adequate space for on-site storage and efficient collection of mixed solid waste and source separated Recyclables prior to pick-up and removal by haulers. The applicant must choose one (1). of the following four (4) methods to demonstrate compliance: Minimum Standard Waste Assessment, Comprehensive Recycling Plan, or Franchised Hauler Review and Sign-Off. The applicant will have to submit evidence or a plan which indicates compliance with this section. Regardless of which method chosen, the applicant will have to submit a written sign-off-from the franchise hauler regarding the facility location and compatibility. The proposed development meets the minimum standards method of compliance as specified in Section 18.755.040.C. This method specifies a minimum storage area requirement based on the size and general use category of the new construction. Non-residential office buildings must provide a minimum storage area of 10 square feet, plus 4 square feet/1,000 square feet of gross floor area (GFA). The proposed building contains 7,250 square feet GFA, requiring 29 square feet of storage. The applicant is proposing a refuse container area of 280 square feet. Therefore, this standard has been satisfied. Location Standards. To encourage its use, the storage area for source-separated recyclable shall be co- located with the storage area for residual mixed solid waste; Indoor and outdoor storage areas shall comply with Uniform Building and Fire Code requirements; Storage area space requirements can be satisfied with a single location or multiple locations, and can combine both interior and exterior locations; Exterior storage areas can be located within interior side yard or rear yard areas. Exterior storage areas shall not be located within a required front yard setback or in a yard adjacent to a public or private street; Exterior storage areas shall be located in central and visible locations on a site to enhance security for users; Exterior storage areas can be located in a parking area, if the proposed use provides at least the minimum number of parking spaces required for the use after deducting the area used for storage. Storage areas shall be appropriately screened according to the provisions in 18.755.050 C, design standards; The storage area shall be accessible for collection vehicles and located so that the storage area will not obstruct pedestrian or vehicle traffic movement on the site or on public streets adjacent to the site. The proposed refuse container area is accessed from the proposed parking lot and is visible from the rear of the proposed building in order to enhance security for users. The proposed refuse container will not occupy any parking stalls and screening has been addressed above under Chapter 18.745 (Landscaping and Screening). NOTICE OF TYPE II DECISION SDR2003-00008/MINUTEMAN PRESS PAGE 15 OF 28 Design Standards. The dimensions of the storage area shall accommodate containers consistent with current methods of local collection; Storage containers shall meet Uniform Fire Code standards and be made and covered with waterproof materials or situated in a covered area; Exterior storage areas shall be enclosed by a sight-obscuring fence wall, or hedge at least six feel in height. Gate openings which allow access to users and haulers shall be provided. Gate openings for haulers shall be a minimum of 10 feet wide and shall be capable of being secured in a closed and open position• Storage area(s) and containers shall be clearly labeled to indicate the type of materials accepted. The storage area is located at the northwest corner of the property. Its dimensions are approximately 14 feet by 20 feet. The applicant has not provided information indicating that the openings are designed to allow for adequate access for haulers. Therefore, the applicant is required to provide documentation that the franchise hauler for the area is satisfied that the design of the refuse container area is compatible with waste pick up practices. FINDING: Because the applicant has not provided evidence of compliance with the Mixed Solid Waste and Recyclables Storage design standards, this standard has not been met. If the applicant complies with the condition listed below, the standards will be met: CONDITION: Provide documentation that the franchise hauler for the area is satisfied that the design of the refuse container area is compatible with waste pick up practices. OFF-STREET PARKING AND LOADING (18.765): Location of vehicle parking: Off-street parking spaces for single-family and duplex dwellings and single-family attached dwellings shall be located on the same lot with the dwellings. Off-street parking lots for uses not listed above shall be located not further than 200 feet from the building or use that they are required to serve, measured in a straight line from the building with the following exceptions: a) commercial and industrial uses which require more than 40 parking spaces may provide for the spaces in excess of the required first 40 spaces up,to a distance of 300 feet from the primary site; The 40 parking spaces which remain on the primary site must be available for users in the following order of priority: 1) Disabled-accessible spaces; 2) Short-term spaces; 3) Long-term preferential carpool and vanpool spaces; 4) Long-term spaces. The parking lot associated with this project, at the furthest point away from the proposed building is 80 feet. All parking has been proposed to be located on-site. Therefore, this standard has been satisfied. Joint Parking: Owners of two or more uses, structures or parcels of land may agree to utilize jointly the same parking and loading spaces when the peak hours of operation do not overlay, subject to the following: 1) The size of the joint parking facility shall be at least as large as the number of vehicle parking spaces required by the larger(est) use per Section 18.765.070; 2) Satisfactory legal evidence shall be presented to the Director in the form of deeds, leases or contracts to establish the joint use; 3) If a joint use arrangement is subsequently terminated, or if the uses change, the requirements of this title thereafter apply to each separately. Joint parking has not been proposed with this project. Therefore, this standard does not apply. Parking in Mixed-Use Projects: In mixed-use projects, the required minimum vehicle parking shall be determined using the following formula. 1) Primary use, i.e., that with the largest proportion of total floor area within the development, at 100% of the minimum vehicle parking required for that use in Section 18.765.060; 2) Secondary use, i.e., that with the second largest percentage of total floor area within the development, at 90% of the vehicle parking required for that use in Section 18.765.060; 3) Subsequent use or uses, at 80% of the vehicle parking required for that use(s) in Section 18.765.060; 4) The maximum parking allowance shall be 150% of the total minimum parking as calculated in D.1.-3. above. NOTICE OF TYPE II DECISION SDR2003-00008/MINUTEMAN PRESS PAGE 16 OF 28 The project is not considered a mixed-use project. Therefore, this standard does not apply. Visitor Parking in Multi-Family Residential Developments: Multi-dwelling units with more than 10 required parking spaces shall provide an additional 15% of vehicle parking spaces above the minimum required for the use of guests of residents of the complex. These spaces shall be centrally located or distributed throughout the development. Required bicycle parking facilities shall also be centrally located within or evenly distributed throughout the development. This project does not involve a residential use. Therefore, this standard does not apply. Preferential Long-Term Carpool/Vanpool Parking: Parking lots providing in excess of 20 long-term parking spaces shall provide preferential long-term carpool and vanpool parking for employees, students and other regular visitors to the site. At least 5% of total long-term parking spaces shall be reserved for carpool/vanpool use. Preferential parking for carpools/vanpools shall be closer to the main entrances of the building than any other employee or student parking except parking spaces designated for use by the disabled. Preferential carpool/vanpool spaces shall be full-sized per requirements in Section 18.765.040N and shall be clearly designated for use only by carpools and vanpools between 7:00 AM and 5:30 PM Monday through Friday. The proposed parking lot associated with the office building is required to provide a minimum of 19 parking stalls. One of the applicant's plans show the site to be constructed with 17 parking stalls, and another plan the applicant submitted shows 18 parking stalls. Therefore, due to site constraints, the applicant will be pressed to meet the minimum required parking (19) which is below 20 long-term parking spaces. No carpool or vanpool spaces will be conditioned. Disabled-Accessible Parking: All parking areas shall be provided with the required number of parking spaces for disabled persons as specified by the State of Oregon Uniform Building Code and federal standards. Such parking spaces shall be sized, signed and marked as required by these regulations. The applicant is required to provide a minimum of 19 parking spaces, therefore, one van accessible (9 feet wide with an 8-foot aisle) ADA handicap space is required. The applicant's plans show one ADA space that will be 9 feet wide with an 8-foot aisle. Therefore, this standard has been met. Access Drives: With regard to access to public streets from off-street parking: access drives from the street to off-street parking or loading areas shall be designed and constructed to facilitate the flow of traffic and provide maximum safety for pedestrian and vehicular traffic on the site; the number and size of access drives shall be in accordance with the requirements of Chapter, 18.705, Access, Egress and Circulation; access drives shall be clearly and permanently marked and defined through use of rails, fences, walls or other barriers or markers on frontage not occupied by service drives; access drives shall have a minimum vision clearance in accordance with Chapter 18.795, Visual Clearance; access drives shall be improved with an asphalt or concrete surface; and excluding single-family and duplex residences, except as provided by Subsection 18.810.030.P, groups of two or more parking spaces shall be served by a service drive so that no backing movements or other maneuvering within a street or other public right-of-way will be required. The plans submitted by the applicant show the access drive clearly marked with concrete curbs on either side of the proposed drive. On-site pedestrian safety is established by discouraging pedestrians from entering the property through the access drive by not providing a walkway adjacent to the drive. Instead, the applicant proposes to heavily landscape the areas adjacent to the access drive. The applicant has also provided a walkway for pedestrians to access the rear of the proposed building on the north side of the property, which is the furthest point away from the proposed access drive. Visual Clearance Is addressed further in this decision. The applicant has proposed to construct the parking area in accordance with the standards of Chapter 18.765 (Off-Street Parking and Loading Requirements), which ensure safe maneuvering and discourage backing movements with the street. Therefore, this standard has been satisfied. NOTICE OF TYPE II DECISION SDR2003-00008/MINUTEMAN PRESS PAGE 17 OF 28 Pedestrian Access: Pedestrian access through parking lots shall be provided in accordance with Section 18.705.030.F. Where a parking area or other vehicle area has a drop-off grade separation, the property owner shall install a wall, railing, or other barrier which will prevent a slow-moving vehicle or driverless vehicle from escaping such area and which will prevent pedestrians from walking over drop-off edges. Pedestrian access has been discussed previously in this decision under Chapter 18.705 (Access Egress and Circulation) and access is not proposed through the parking lot. Parking Lot Striping: Except for single-family and duplex residences, any area intended to be used to meet the off-street parking requirements as contained in this Chapter shall have all parking spaces clearly marked; and all interior drives and access aisles shall be clearly marked and signed to show direction of flow and maintain vehicular and pedestrian safety. The plans submitted show the parking spaces will be clearly marked with striping. Therefore, this standard has been satisfied. Wheel Stops: Parking spaces along the boundaries of a parking lot or adjacent to interior landscaped areas or sidewalks shall be provided with a wheel stop at least four inches high located three feet back from the front of the parking stall. The front three feet of the parking stall may be concrete, asphalt or low lying landscape material that does not exceed the height of the wheel stop. This area cannot be calculated to meet landscaping or sidewalk requirements. The plans submitted by the applicant do not show wheel stops to be installed. The applicant has indicated that perimeter curbs will be installed which will be satisfactory for the boundary parking stalls. However, the internal parking stalls along the proposed sidewalk will need to be constructed with wheel stops. Space and Aisle Dimensions: Section 18.765.040.N states that: "except as modified for angled parking in Figures 18.765.1 and 18.765.2 the minimum dimensions for parking spaces are: 8.5 feet x 18.5 feet for a standard space and 7.5 feet x 16.5 feet for a compact space; aisles accommodating two direction traffic, or allowing access from both ends, shall be 24 feet in width. The applicant's plans indicate that all stalls will be 8% by 20 feet (standard spaces). However, the applicant has the option of providing 50% of the proposed parking as compact spaces. The access isle is shown to be 24 feet in width. Therefore, this criterion has been satisfied. Bicycle Parking Location and Access: Section 18.765.050 states bicycle parking areas shall be provided at locations within 50 feet of primary entrances to structures; bicycle parking areas shall not be located within parking aisles, landscape areas or pedestrian ways; outdoor bicycle parking shall be visible from on-site buildings and/or the street. When the bicycle parking area is not visible from the street, directional signs shall be used to located the parking area; and bicycle parking may be located inside a building on a floor which has an outdoor entrance open for use and floor location which does not require the bicyclist to use stairs to gain access to the space. Exceptions may be made to the latter requirement for parking on upper stories within a multi-story residential building. According to Table 18.765.2 of the Tigard Development Code, the minimum bicycle-parking requirement for an office use is 0.5 spaces per 1,000 square feet. Therefore, the proposed building will be required to provide a 4-stall bicycle rack. The site plan shows a 2-stall bicycle rack. Therefore, the applicant is required to provide a 4-stall bicycle rack that is within 50 feet of the west entrance. Because the proposed bicycle rack cannot be seen from SW Hermoso Way, directional signs will also be required. NOTICE OF TYPE II DECISION SDR2003-00008/MINUTEMAN PRESS PAGE 18 OF 28 Bicycle Parking Design Requirements: Section 18.765.050.C. The following design requirements apply to the installation of bicycle racks: The racks required for required bicycle parking spaces shall ensure that bicycles may be securely locked to them without undue inconvenience. Provision of bicycle lockers for long-term (employee) parking is encouraged but not required; bicycle racks must be securely anchored to the ground, wall or other structure; bicycle parking spaces shall be at least 2'/2 feet by six feet long, and, when covered, with a vertical clearance of seven feet. An access aisle of at least five feet wide shall be provided and maintained beside or between each row of bicycle parking; each required bicycle parking space must be accessible without moving another bicycle; required bicycle parking spaces may not be rented or leased except where required motor vehicle parking is rented or leased. At-cost or deposit fees for bicycle parking are exempt from this requirement; and areas set aside for required bicycle parking must be clearly reserved for bicycle parking only. Outdoor bicycle parking facilities shall be surfaced with a hard surfaced material, i.e., pavers, asphalt, concrete or similar material. This surface must be designed to remain well drained. The applicant has not provided a detail of the bike rack to be used; therefore, Staff is unable to confirm that this standard is met. Minimum Bicycle Parking Requirements: The total number of required bicycle parking spaces for each use is specified in Table 18.765.2 in Section 18.765.070.H. In no case shall there be less than two bicycle parking spaces. As discussed above, Table 18.765.2 of the Tigard Development Code, requires bicycle-parking for an office use to be 0.5 spaces per 1,000 square feet. The applicant has shown a 2-stall bicycle rack and has been conditioned to provide a 4-stall bicycle rack. Minimum Off-Street Parking: Section 18.765.070.H states that the minimum and maximum parking shall be as required in Table 18.765.2. Table 18.765.2 states that the minimum parking for General Office Use is 2.7 spaces per 1,000 square feet. Based on a 7,250 square foot building, the applicant is required to provide a minimum of 19 parking spaces. One of the applicant s plans show the site to be constructed with 17 parking stalls, and another plan the applicant submitted shows 18 parking stalls. Therefore, the applicant is required to reconfigure the proposed parking lot to provide a minimum of 19 parking stalls. Off-Street Loading Spaces: Commercial, industrial and institutional buildings or structures to be built or altered which receive and distribute material or merchandise by truck shall provide and maintain off-street loading and maneuvering space as follows: A minimum of one loading space is required for buildings with 10,000 gross square feet or more; A minimum of two loading spaces for buildings with 40,000 gross square feet or more. The building is less than 10,000 square feet; therefore, the applicant is not required to provide a loading space. FINDING: Based on the analysis above, the off-street parking and loading standards have not been fully met, however, if the applicant complies with the conditions listed below, the standards will be fully met: CONDITIONS: • The applicant is required to provide all internal parking stalls along the proposed sidewalk with wheel stops. • Provide a 4-stall bicycle rack within 50 feet of the west entrance. • Provide directional signs back to the required bicycle rack. • Submit details of the bicycle rack to be used. NOTICE OF TYPE II DECISION SDR2003-00008/MINUTEMAN PRESS PAGE 19 OF 28 SIGNS (18.780): Chapter 18.78 .130.D lists the type of allowable signs and sign area permitted in the MUE Zoning District. No signs have been formally proposed. However, the applicant has indicated in the narrative that a wall sign will be applied for which has been addressed above under Chapter 18.620 (Tigard Triangle Design Standards). FINDING: Because signs will be reviewed and approved as part of a separate permit process, this standard has been satisfied. Tree Removal (18.790): Section 18.790.030 requires that a tree plan for the planting, removal and protection of trees prepared by a certified arborist shall be rovided with a site development review application. The tree plan shall include identification of all existing trees, identification of a program to save existing trees or mitigate tree removal over 12 inches in caliper, which trees are to be removed, protection program defining standards and methods that will be used by the applicant to protect trees during and after construction. The applicant has provided a report prepared by a certified arborist indicating that there are a total of eight trees over 12 inches in diameter. The plans submitted show a total of ten trees over 12 inches. In any case, of the ten trees over 12 inches in diameter, one of them is considered hazardous. The applicant proposes to remove all of the trees over 12 inches in diameter on site except for two. Therefore, the applicant is retaining 20% of the trees over 12 inches in diameter and will be required to mitigate 100% of the viable trees to be removed. FINDING: Based on the analysis above, the applicant will be required to mitigate for a total of 134 inches, and prior to site work, the applicant must install all tree protection measures and contact the City's Forester and a member of the Planning Staff for sign off. CONDITIONS: Provide a tree mitigation plan for 134 inches and implement accordingly. Prior to site work, the applicant must install all tree protection measures and contact the City's Forester and a member of the Planning Staff for sign-off. VISUAL CLEARANCE AREAS (18.795): Chapter 18.795 requires that a clear vision area shall be maintained on the corners of all property adjacent to intersecting right-of-ways or the intersection of a public street and a private driveway. A clear vision area shall contain no vehicle, hedge, planting, fence, wall structure, or temporary or permanent obstruction exceeding three (3) feet in height. The code provides that obstructions that may be located in this area shall be visually clear between three (3) and eight (8) feet in height (8) (trees may be placed within this area provided that all branches below eight (8) feet are removed). A visual clearance area is the triangular area formed by measuring a 30-foot distance along the street right- of-way and the driveway, and then connecting these two (2), 30-foot distance points with a straight line. The applicant's narrative indicates that the visual clearance triangle associated with the proposed driveway and SW Hermoso Way will be free of obstructions. However, the Vegetation Survey map shows Juniperus Chinensis to be located within the visual clearance triangle. Therefore, the applicant is required to provide information verifying that the proposed shrubbery will not grow within the required three to eight foot height clearance area . FINDING: Based on the analysis above, the vision clearance standards have not been met. However, if the applicant complies with the condition listed below, the standards will be fully met. CONDITION: Provide information verifying that the proposed shrubbery located on the southern property line will not grow within the required visual clearance triangle area or trim according to the standard. NOTICE OF TYPE II DECISION SDR2003-00008/MINUTEMAN PRESS PAGE 20 OF 28 C. SPECIFIC SITE DEVELOPMENT REVIEW APPROVAL STANDARDS Section 18.360.090(A)(2) through 18.360.090(A)(15) provides additional Site Development Review approval standards not necessarily covered by the provisions of the previously listed sections. These additional standards are addressed immediately below with the following exceptions: The proposal contains no elements related to the provisions of the following and are, therefore, found to be inapplicable as approval standards: 18.360.090.3 (Exterior Elevations); 18.360.090.5 (Privacy and Noise: Multi-family or Group Living Uses); 18.360.090.6 (Private Outdoor Areas: Multi-family Use); 18.360.090.7 (Shared Outdoor Recreation Areas: Multi-family Use); 18.360.090.8 (100-year floodplain); and 18.360.090.9 (Demarcation of Spaces). The following sections were discussed previously in this decision and, therefore, will not be addressed in this section: 18.360.090.4 (Buffering, Screening and Compatibility Between Adjoining Uses; 18.360.090.13 (P(Parking); 18.360.090.14 (Landscaping); 18.360.090.15 (Drainage); and 18.360.090.14 rovision for the Disabled). Relationship to the Natural and Physical Environment: Buildings shall be: located to preserve existing trees, topography and natural drainage where possible based upon existing site conditions; located in areas not subject to ground slumping or sliding; located to provide adequate distance between adjoining buildings for adequate light, air circulation, and fire-fighting; and oriented with consideration for sun and wind. Trees shall be preserved to the extent possible. Replacement of trees is subject to the requirements of Chapter 18.790, Tree Removal. The building is located on the site in accordance with the Tigard Triangle Design Standards. The site is not in an area identified as prone to sliding. The building has a 40-foot buffer from the nearest adjoining property line, thus, providing adequate light and air circulation. The Deputy Fire Marshall has submitted comments located under agency comments. Crime Prevention and Safety: A. Windows shall be located so that areas vulnerable to crime can be surveyed by the occupants; B. Interior laundry and service areas shall be located in a way that they can be observed by others; C. Mail boxes shall be located in lighted areas having vehicular or pedestrian traffic; D. The exterior lighting levels shall be selected and the angles shall be oriented towards areas vulnerable to crime; and E. Light fixtures shall be provided in areas having heavy pedestrian or vehicular traffic and in potentially dangerous areas such as parking lots, stairs, ramps and abrupt grade changes. Fixtures shall be placed at a height so that light patterns overlap at a height of seven feet, which is sufficient to illuminate a person. Windows are oriented towards the parking lot and the street. The City of Tigard Police Department has reviewed this project and requests a detailed lighting plan for the exterior. Public Transit: Provisions within the plan shall be included for providing for transit if the development proposal is adjacent to existing or proposed transit route; the requirements for transit facilities shall be based on: the location of other transit facilities in the area; and the size and type of the proposal. The following facilities may be required after City and Tri-Met review: bus stop shelters; turnouts for buses; and connecting paths to the shelters. The site has frontage on SW Hermoso Way, which is not on Tri-Met transit routes, therefore, this standard does not apply. NOTICE OF TYPE II DECISION SDR2003-00008/MINUTEMAN PRESS PAGE 21 OF 28 Provisions of the Underlying Zone: All of the provisions and regulations of the underlying zone shall apply unless modified by other sections or this title, e.g., Planned Developments, Chapter 18.350; or a variance or adjustment granted under Chapter 18.370. Dimensional Requirements: Dimensional standards have been addressed above under Section 18.520.040 (Development Standards). However, Section 18.520.050 (Special Limitations on Uses) requires the maximum floor area ratio (FAR) for all commercial and industrial use types and mixed-use developments shall not exceed 0.40 in the MUE zoning district. The subject site is approximately .42 acres (18,182 feet), therefore, the proposed building cannot exceed 7,273 square feet. The applicant has proposed a 7,250 square foot building. FINDING: Based on the analysis above, the underlying zoning district standards have not been fully met, however, if the applicant complies with the conditions listed below, the standards will be fully met. CONDITION:Submit a detailed lighting plan to the Tigard Police Department and the Tigard Planning Department for review. D. STREET AND UTILITY IMPROVEMENTS STANDARDS (18.810 Chapter 18.810 provides construction standards tor the implementation ion of public and private facilities and utilities such as streets, sewers, and drainage. The applicable standards are addressed below: Streets: Improvements: Section 18.810.030.A.1 states that streets within a development and streets adjacent shall be improved in accordance with the TDC standards. Section 18.810.030.A.2 states that any new street or additional street width planned as a ortion of an existing street shall be dedicated and improved in accordance with the TDC. Minimum Rights-of-Way and Street Widths: Section 18.620.080.A, Tigard Triangle Street and Accessway Standards, requires a local street to have a 60 right-of-way width and 36-foot paved section. Other improvements required may include on-street parking sidewalks and bikeways, underground utilities, street lighting, storm drainage, and street trees. This site lies adjacent to SW Hermosa Way, which is classified as a local street on the City of Tigard Transportation Plan Map. At present, there is approximately 25 feet of ROW from centerline, according to the most recent tax assessor's map. The applicant must dedicate an additional 5 feet of ROW to meet street standards. SW Hermosa Way is currently partially improved. In order to mitigate the impact from this development, the applicant must construct half-street improvements along the frontage of the site. The applicant's plans show they will make this improvement as a part of this project. The paved width from centerline shall be 18 feet. Sidewalks: Section 18.810.070.A requires that sidewalks be constructed to meet City design standards and be located on both sides of arterial, collector and local residential streets. Private streets and industrial streets shall have sidewalks on at least one side. The applicant's plans indicate construction of a new sidewalk behind a planter strip. Therefore, the criterion is met. Sanitary Sewers: Sewers Required: Section 18.810.090.A requires that sanitary sewer be installed to serve each new development and to connect developments to existing mains in accordance with the provisions set forth in Design and Construction Standards for Sanitary and Surface Water Management (as adopted by Clean Water Services in 1996 and including any future revisions or amendments) and the adopted policies of the comprehensive plan. NOTICE OF TYPE II DECISION SDR2003-00008/MINUTEMAN PRESS PAGE 22 OF 28 Over-sizing: Section 18.810.090.0 states that proposed sewer systems shall include consideration of additional development within the area as projected by the Comprehensive Plan. There is an existing 8-inch sewer line in Hermosa Way. The applicant's plan shows they will extend a new sewer lateral to the site to serve the new building. This site is located in Sanitary Sewer Reimbursement District #15. Any unpaid assessment would have to be paid prior to issuance of a building permit. The applicant should contact Greg Berry, Utility Engineer, City of Tigard, for the current assessment for this site. Storm Drainage: General Provisions: Section 18.810.100.A requires developers to make adequate provisions for storm water and flood water runoff. Accommodation of Upstream Drainage: Section 18.810.100.0 states that a culvert or other drainage facility shall be large enough to accommodate potential runoff from its entire upstream drainage area, whether inside or outside the development. The City Engineer shall approve the necessary size of the facility, based on the provisions of Design and Construction Standards for Sanitary and Surface Water Management (as adopted by Clean Water Services in 2000 and including any future revisions or amendments). The applicant's street improvement plans shall include the extension of the public storm sewer in Hermosa Way to the north end of their frontage. Catch basin(s) will be installed per the standard spacing requirements and connect to the public storm line. Therefore, this standard has been satisfied. Effect on Downstream Drainage: Section 18.810.100.D states that where it is anticipated by the City Engineer that the additional runoff resulting from the development will overload an existing drainage facility, the Director and Engineer shall withhold approval of the development until provisions have been made for improvement of the potential condition or until provisions have been made for storage of additional runoff caused by the development in accordance with the Design and Construction Standards for Sanitary and Surface Water Management (as adopted by Clean Water Services in 2000 and including any future revisions or amendments). In 1997, Clean Water Services (CWS) completed a basin study of Fanno Creek and adopted the Fanno Creek Watershed Management Plan. Section V of that plan includes a recommendation that local governments institute a stormwater detention/effective impervious area reduction program resulting in no net increase in storm peak flows up to the 25-year event. The City will require that all new developments resulting in an increase of impervious surfaces provide onsite detention facilities, unless the development is located adjacent to Fanno Creek. For those developments adjacent to Fanno Creek, the storm water runoff will be permitted to discharge without detention. The applicant's plan shows that stormwater runoff will be conveyed to a water quality/detention swale along the west boundary of the site. The engineer's calculations provide for detention of the 25 year storm. The engineer shall submit additional calculations for the 2 and 10 year storms, per CWS Design Standards. The engineer had also submitted supplemental information for the discharge point of the storm swale with the initial application for completeness. This information addressed downstream concerns along with a revised outfall detail. This information shall be included with the applicant's PFI submittal. Utilities: Section 18.810.120 states that all utility lines, but not limited to those required for electric, communication, lighting and cable television services and related facilities shall be placed underground, except for surface mounted transformers, surface mounted connection boxes and meter cabinets which may be placed above ground, temporary utility service facilities during construction, high capacity electric lines operating at 50,000 volts or above, and: NOTICE OF TYPE II DECISION SDR2003-00008/MINUTEMAN PRESS PAGE 23 OF 28 • The developer shall make all necessary arrangements with the serving utility to provide the underground services; • The City reserves the right to approve location of all surface mounted facilities; • All underground utilities, including sanitary sewers and storm drains installed in streets by the developer, shall be constructed prior to the surfacing of the streets; and • Stubs for service connections shall be long enough to avoid disturbing the street improvements when service connections are made. Exception to Under-Grounding Requirement: Section 18.810.120.0 states that a developer shall pay a fee in-lieu of under-grounding costs when the development is proposed to take place on a street where existing utilities which are not underground will serve the development and the approval authority determines that the cost and technical difficulty of under-grounding the utilities outweighs the benefit of under- grounding in conjunction with the development. The determination shall be on a case- by-case basis. The most common, but not the only, such situation is a short frontage development for which under-grounding would result in the placement of additional poles, rather than the removal of above-ground utilities facilities. An applicant for a development which is served by utilities which are not underground and which are located across a public right-of-way from the applicant's property shall pay a fee in-lieu of under-grounding. There are existing overhead utility lines along the frontage of SW Hermosa Way. If the fee in-lieu is proposed, it is equal to $35.00 per lineal foot of street frontage that contains the overhead lines. The frontage along this site is 125 lineal feet; therefore, the fee would be $4,375.00. ADDITIONAL CITY AND/OR AGENCY CONCERNS WITH STREET AND UTILITY IMPROVEMENT STANDARDS: Traffic Study Findings: Kittelson & Associates, Inc. prepared a Trip Generation and Distribution Assessment, dated September 8, 2003. Kittelson analyzed two key intersections: SW 72nd Avenue/SW Dartmouth Street SW 68th Avenue/SW Dartmouth Street These two critical intersections have been identified as needing traffic signals. As development has occurred in the Tigard Triangle, and where a development introduces additional trips to these intersections, funds have been collected from the developers that will contribute to the future signal installation. The first project to contribute funds to the intersections was Babies R Us. A simple formula was established based upon the impact from that development. That project had an impact of 1.1% at SW 72n Avenue/SW Dartmouth Street during the PM peak hour. For that impact, the City Council required the developer to pay funds in the amount of $20,000.00. At the intersection of SW 68t Avenue/SW Dartmouth Street, the impact from that project was estimated to be 0.75%. For this impact, the developer was required to pay $10,000.00. Using the same rationale, a proportionate share has been calculated for other projects in the Triangle, and can be calculated for this project. In order to provide the most fair comparison to the Babies R Us project, it is necessary to use the same anticipated total entering volumes (TEV) estimated as part of the Babies R Us traffic report. That report anticipated more build-out of the triangle area, including the Tri-County site at 72nd/ Dartmouth. Kittelson's report shows that this project will generate 5 PM peak hour trips at the intersection of 72nd Avenue/Dartmouth Street. With a total entering volume (TEV) of 2,555 vehicles, the project impact is 0.20%. Therefore, based on simple proportions, the project contribution to this intersection is $3,636.00. Likewise, the Kittelsop report shows that the project will generate 2 PM peak hour trips at the intersection of 68t Avenue/Dartmouth Street. With a TEV of 2,660 vehicles, the impact from this development is 0.08%. Therefore, based on the same proportion used in the Babies R Us development, the project contribution to this intersection is $1,002.00. NOTICE OF TYPE II DECISION SDR2003-00008/MINUTEMAN PRESS PAGE 24 OF 28 Funds for both intersections must be paid to the City prior to a final building inspection. Public Water System: This site is located within the Tualatin Valley Water District (TVWD). There is an existing 12-inch water line located in SW Hermosa Way. The applicant has indicated that they will be using the existing water service. The applicant needs to show on their plans how fire hydrant spacing standards will be met. TVWD will have to review and approve the applicant's proposed water line plans. Storm Water Quality: The City has agreed to enforce Surface Water Management (SWM) regulations established by Clean Water Services (CWS) Design and Construction Standards (adopted by Resolution and Order No. 00-7) which require the construction of on-site water quality facilities. The facilities shall be designed to remove 65 percent of the phosphorus contained in 100 percent of the storm water runoff generated from newly created impervious surfaces. In addition, a maintenance plan shall be submitted indicating the frequency and method to be used in keeping the facility maintained through the year. Prior to construction, the applicant shall submit plans and calculations for a water quality facility that will meet the intent of the CWS Design Standards. In addition, the applicant shall submit a maintenance plan for the facility that must be reviewed and approved by the City prior to construction. The applicant's plans show that they will construct an extended dry detention swale to treat the onsite runoff. To ensure compliance with Clean Water Services design and construction standards, the applicant shall employ the design engineer responsible for the design and specifications of the private water quality facility to perform construction and visual observation of the water quality facility for compliance with the design and specifications. These inspections shall be made at significant stages throughout the project and at completion of the construction. Prior to final building inspection, the design engineer shall provide the City of Tigard (Inspection Supervisor) with written confirmation that the water quality facility is in compliance with the design and specifications. Grading and Erosion Control: CWS Design and Construction Standards also regulate erosion control to reduce the amount of sediment and other pollutants reaching the public storm and surface water system resulting from development, construction, grading, excavating, clearing, and any other activity which accelerates erosion. Per CWS regulations, the applicant is required to submit an erosion control plan for City review and approval prior to issuance of City permits. The Federal Clean Water Act requires that a National Pollutant Discharge Elimination System (NPDES) erosion control permit be issued for any development that will disturb one or more acre of land. Since this site is over five acres, the developer will be required to obtain an NPDES permit from the City prior to construction. This permit will be issued along with the site and/or building permit. The Building Division, as a part of the site permit review, will review a grading/erosion control plan. An NPDES permit is not required, as the development will not disturb more than one acre. Address Assignments: The City of Tigard is responsible for assigning addresses for parcels within the City of Tigard and within the Urban Service Boundary (USB). An addressing fee in the amount of $50.00 per address shall be assessed. This fee shall be paid to the City prior to final plat approval. For this project, the addressing fee will be $50.00 (1 lots and/or tracts X $50/address = $50.00). NOTICE OF TYPE II DECISION SDR2003-00008/MINUTEMAN PRESS PAGE 25 OF 28 E. IMPACT STUDY (18.390): Section 18.360.090 states, "The Director shall make a finding with respect to each of the following criteria when approving, approving with conditions or denying an application:' Section 18.390.040 states that the applicant shall provide an impact study to quantify the effect of development on public facilities and services. For each public facility system and type of impact, the study shall propose improvements necessary to meet City standard, and to minimize the impact of the development on the public at large, public facilities systems, and affected private property users. In situations where the Community Development Code requires the dedication of real property interests, the applicant shall either specifically concur with a requirement for public right-of-way dedication, or provide evidence that supports that the real property dedication is not roughly proportional to the rojected impacts of the development. Section 18.390.040 states that when a condition of approval requires the transfer to the public of an interest in real property, the approval authority shall adopt findings which support the conclusion that the interest in real property to be transferred is roughly proportional to the impact the proposed development will have on the public. The applicant has provided an impact study addressing the project's impacts on public systems. The Washington County Traffic Impact Fee (TIF) is a mitigation measure that is required at the time of development. Based on a transportation impact study prepared by Mr. David Larson for the A-Boy Expansion/Dolan II/Resolution 95-61, TIF's are expected to recapture 32 percent of the traffic impact of new development on the collector and arterial Street system. The applicant will be required to pay TIF's of approximately $25,022 based on the use proposed. Based on the estimate that total TIF fees cover 32 percent of the impact, on major street improvements citywide, a fee that would cover 100 percent of this projects traffic impact is $78,194 ($25,022 divided by .32). The difference between the TIF paid, and the full impact, is considered the unmitigated impact on the street system. The unmitigated impact of this project on the transportation system is 53,172. The applicant has proposed to construct half-street improvements along SW Hermoso Way. The cost of the improvements is expected to be $35,888 (625 square feet x $15.00 per square foot = $9,375 for dedicated right-of-way + 4,638 for signalization + 125 lineal feet x $175.00 per lineal foot = $21,875 for half street improvements.) Thus, it is roughly proportional to the unmitigated impacts. In any event, the applicant has proposed to construct these improvements. SECTION VII. OTHER STAFF COMMENTS City of Tigard Long Range Planning Division has reviewed the proposal and has no objections to it. City of Tigard Police Department has reviewed the proposal and has provided the following comments: Please provide a "lighting plan" to determine lighting levels in and around the building. City of Tigard Water Department has reviewed the proposal and has no objections to it. City of Tigard Building Division has reviewed the proposal and has offered the following comments: An accessible route to the public way is required from the lower level or an elevator will be required. City of Tigard Urban Forester has reviewed the proposal and has no objections to it. NOTICE OF TYPE II DECISION SDR2003-00008/MINUTEMAN PRESS PAGE 26 OF 28 SECTION VIII. AGENCY COMMENTS Tri-Met has reviewed the proposal and has no objections to it. Washington County has reviewed the proposal and has no objections to it. Tualatin Valley Fire and Rescue has reviewed the proposal and has provided the following comments: 1) PAINTED CURBS: Where required, fire apparatus access roadway curbs shall be painted yellow and marked "NO PARKING FIRE LANE" at each 25 feet. Lettering shall have a stroke of not less than one inch wide by six inches high. Lettering shall be white on red or black on yellow background. (UFC Sec. 901.4.5.2) 2) COMMERCIAL BUILDINGS - REQUIRED FIRE FLOW: The required fire flow for the building shall not exceed 3,000 gallons per minute (GPM) or the available GPM in the water delivery system at 20 psi, whichever is less. A worksheet for calculating the required fire flow is available from the Fire Marshal's Office. (UFC Sec. 903.3) The minimum required fire flow is 2299 gpm @ 20 psi. Documentation shall be provided. 3) COMMERCIAL BUILDINGS - FIRE HYDRANTS: No portion of the exterior of a commercial building shall be located more than 250 feet from a fire hydrant when measured in an approved manner around the outside of the building and along an approved fire apparatus access roadway. Any hydrants that are left over from the minimum number of hydrant calculations may be full filled by hydrants that are up to 500 feet from any point of the building. The fire Prevention Ordinance has further requirements that need to be used for acceptance and placement of fire hydrants. (UFC Sec. 903.4.2.1) 4) COMMERCIAL BUILDINGS - MINIMUM NUMBER OF FIRE HYDRANTS: The minimum number of fire hydrants for a building shall be based on the required fire flow prior to giving credit for fire protection systems divided by 1500. If the answer is equal to or greater than x.5 the next whole number of hydrants shall be used. There shall not be less than 2 hydrants per building. (UFC Sec. 903.4.2.1) Considerations for placing fire hydrants shall be as follows: • Existing hydrants in the area may be used to meet the required number of hydrants; however, hydrants that are over 500 feet away from the nearest point of the subject building shall not contribute to the required number of hydrants. • Hydrants that are separated from the subject building by railroad tracks shall not contribute to the required number of hydrants. • Hydrants that are separated from the subject building by divided highway, freeway, or heavily traveled collector streets shall not contribute to the required number of hydrants. • Hydrants that are accessible only by a bridge shall be acceptable to contribute to the required number of hydrants only if approved by the Chief. • Private hydrants or public hydrants that are on adjacent private property shall not contribute to the required number of hydrants for the subject building. • Exc : The use of hydrants located on other private property may be considered if their locations and access are encumbered in a legal document (such as deed restriction) by the owners of the involved parcels of property. The encumbrance may be lifted only after approvals by the Chief on behalf of the fire department and any other governmental agencies that may require approval. • When evaluating the placement of hydrants at apartment or industrial complexes the first hydrant(s) to be placed shall be at the primary access and any secondary access to the site. After these hydrants have been placed other hydrants shall be sited to meet the above requirements for spacing and minimum number of hydrants. (UFC Sec. 903.4.2.1.1) 5) FIRE HYDRANT DISTANCE FROM AN ACCESS ROAD: Fire hydrants shall be located not more than 15 feet from an approved fire apparatus access roadway. (UFC Sec. 903.4.2.4) NOTICE OF TYPE II DECISION SDR2003-00008/MINUTEMAN PRESS PAGE 27 OF 28 6) REFLECTIVE HYDRANT MARKERS: Fire hydrant_locations shall be identified by the installation of reflective markers. The markers shall be blue. They shall be located adjacent and to the side of the centerline of the access road way that the fire hydrant is located on. In case that there is no center line, then assume a centerline, and place the reflectors accordingly. (UFC Sec. 901 .4.3) 7) FIRE HYDRANT/FIRE DEPARTMENT CONNECTION: A fire hydrant shall be located within 70 feet of a fire department connection (FDC). Fire hydrants and FDC's shall be located on the same side of the fire apparatus access roadway. (UFC Sec. 903.4.2.5) FDC locations shall be approved by the Chief. (1996 Oregon Structural Specialty Code, Sec. 904.1 .1) 8) ACCESS AND FIRE FIGHTING WATER SUPPLY DURING CONSTRUCTION: Approved fire apparatus access roadways and fire fighting water supplies shall be installed and operational prior to any other construction on the site or subdivision. (UFC Sec. 8704) 9) BUILDING SURVEY: A building survey and plans, in accordance with TVF&R Ordinance 99-01 , Appendix III-F, shall be submitted. A copy of Appendix III-F, the building survey form and the instructions are available on the Fire District web site. To access this information via Internet, follow this link: SECTION IX. PROCEDURE AND APPEAL INFORMATION Notice: Notice was posted at City Hall and mailed to: X The applicant and owners X Owner of record within the required distance X Affected government agencies Final Decision: THIS DECISION IS FINAL ON NOVEMBER 25, 2003 AND BECOMES EFFECTIVE ON DECEMBER 12, 2003 UNLESS AN APPEAL IS FILED. AAppea-ll: The decision of the Director (Type II Procedure) or Review Authority (Type II Administrative Appeal or Type III Procedure) is final for purposes of appeal on the date that it is mailed. Any party with standing as provided in Section 18.390.040.G.1. may appeal this decision in accordance with Section 18.390.040.G.2. Of the Tigard Community Development Code which provides that a written appeal together with the required fee shall be filed with the Director within ten (10) business days of the date the notice of the decision was mailed. The appeal fee schedule and forms are available from the Planning Division of Tigard City Hall, 13125 SW Hall Boulevard, Tigard, Oregon 97223. Unless the applicant is the appellant, the hearing on an appeal from the Director's Decision shall be confined to the specific issues identified in the written comments submitted by the parties during the comment period. Additional evidence concerning issues.properly raised in the Notice or Appeal may be submitted by any party during the appeal hearing subject to any additional rules of procedure that may be adopted from time to time by the appellate body. THE DEADLINE FOR FILING AN APPEAL IS AT 5:00 PM ON DECEMBER 11, 2003. Questions: If you have any questions, lease call the City of Tigard Planning Division, Tigard City Hall, 13125 SW Hall Boulevard, Tigard, Oregon at (503) 639-4171. November 25, 2003 mi '9 I ': *17. ew c - ::•ger DATE • P :nner �' . V, November 25, 2003 •Y I : ': ''c ar• ' :ewer:='. ' DATE Planning Mana!-r I:\curpin\mathew\sdr\SDR2003-00008.dec.dot NOTICE OF TYPE H DECISION SDR2003-00008/MINUTEMAN PRESS PAGE 29 OF 29 CITY of TIGARD GEOGRAPHIC INFORMATION SYSTEM VICINITY MAP _ DAR SDR2003-00008 IIMIllmulii, I 1 MINUTEMAN PRESS 1 1/!1..,... Pim_ H il• . ER114 OSO s 116 iv Illiallit 4 � ' Ift/ill'i BEVEL4ND ti ��j imiii BEVEIAND T N" J t i ITigard Area Map I / . , 4 4. GONZAGA S" • 1 N 0 100 200 300 400 500 Feet \ V=388 feet 4111.'w 1 City of Tigard 7 Information on this map is for general location only and should be venfied with the Development Services Division. 13125 SW Hall Blvd Tigard,OR 97223 (503)6334171 r I r http://www.citigard.orms Community Development Plot date:Oct 13,2003;C:lmagic\MAGIC03.APR i . se.114 L R 192.12 [M9N[.11Y17471 I (13.119.12.1 / *V f" i � > 1� -'-_ a va• 15.4 5✓424'-0. AB% 1 O • u 411 p iI_pIIihJU r ` Z iiirii*:--v -- ii - Q • • ii,{:i'l • • ' n N I, a / M !:--71S-- :50. alowiftwesia O LOT 22 � 'HERYOSO PARK' 1 1 G 1 1 1 id U r 1 1 1 k G I G rnw N1 1m2 yxw INK U I I..41 INK MU I N K 17. E[ tAT INK 112241 9Ui t 195.7195.71 M ME Y 11 L\ S.W.BEVELAND ST. D f SDR2003-00008 TIGARD OF P �■ SAT E LAN MINUTEMAN PRES S (Map is not to scale) N • EXHIBIT John and Marjorie Joens PMB 130 SDR2003-00008 944 Vetrans Way, #105 MINUTEMAN PRESS Redmond, OR 97756 Bob Davidson Minuteman Press 14285 SW Pacific Highway Tigard, OR 97224 Rory Antis Gray Purcell, Inc. PO Box 23516 Portland, OR 97281-3516 • AFFIDAVIT OF MAILING CITY OF TIGARD Community(Development Shaping A Better Community I, Patricia L. Luord, being first duly sworn/affirm, on oath depose and say that I am a Senior Administrative Specialist for the City of Tigard;Washington County, Oregon and that I served the following: (Check Appropriate Box Is)Below) E2 NOTICE OF DECISION FOR: SDR2003-00008/MINUTEMAN PRESS ❑ AMENDED NOTICE (File No/Name Reference) ® City of Tigard Planning Director A copy of the said notice being hereto attached, marked Exhibit"A", and by reference made a part hereof, was mailed to each named person(s) at the address(s) shown on the attached list(s), marked Exhibit"B", and by reference made a part hereof, on November 25,2003, and deposited in the United States Mail on November 25,2003, postage prepaid. )1 • (.1.4i 65;21/DR4(Person t. repa STATE OT 04ZECGOX ) County f`r of'Wasjhington )ss City of ) Subscribed and sworn/affi ed before me on the /C, day of Deen/91,6-(7Y , 2003. c Y OFFICIAL SEAL /41/1 =�11 : . ��i�Rf, • J BENGTSON NOTARY PUBLIC-OREGON "I I I . ' COMMISSION NO.368086 ' MY COMMISSION EXPIRES APR.27,2007 My Commission Expires: _ /?-7 • • EXHIBIT 14 NOTICE OF TYPE II DECISION SITE DEVELOPMENT REVIEW (SDR) 2003-00008 " ( CITY OF TIGARD MINUTEMAN PRESS Community Development Shaping A Better Community 120 DAYS = 2/5/2004 SECTION I. APPLICATION SUMMARY FILE NAME: MINUTEMAN PRESS CASE NO.: Site Development Review (SDR) SDR2003-00008 PROPOSAL: The applicant is requesting Site Development Review approval to construct a 7,250 square foot commercial office building and associated site improvements. A 1,673 square foot residence currently occupies the site and is proposed to be removed. APPLICANT: Bob Davidson OWNER: John & Marjorie Joens Minuteman Press PMB 130 14285 SW Pacific Highway 944 Vetrans Way, #105 Tigard, OR 97224 Redmond, OR 97756 APPLICANT'S Rory Antis REP.: Gray Purcell, Inc. PO Box 23516 Portland, OR 97281-3516 LOCATION: 7545 SW Hermoso Way; WCTM 2S101AB, Tax Lot 1501. ZONE: MUE; Mixed Use Employment. The MUE zoning district is designed to apply to a majority of the land within the Tigard Triangle, a regional mixed-use employment district bounded by Pacific Highway (HWY. 99), Highway 217 and 1-5. This zoning district permits a wide range of uses including major retail goods and services, business/professional offices, civic uses and housing; the latter includes multi-family housing at a maximum density of 25 units/acre, equivalent to the R-25 zoning district. APPLICABLE REVIEW CRITERIA: Community Development Code Chapters 18.360, 18.390, 18.520, 18.620, 18.705, 18.725, 18.745, 18.755, 18.765, 18.780, 18.790, 18.795 and 18.810. SECTION II . DECISION Notice is hereby given that the City of Tigard Community Development Director's designee has APPROVED the above request subject to certain conditions of approval. The findings and conclusions on which the decision is based are noted in the full decision, available at City Hall. THIS APPROVAL SHALL BE VALID FOR 18 MONTHS FROM THE EFFECTIVE DATE OF THIS DECISION. All documents and applicable criteria in the above-noted file are available for inspection at no cost or copies can be obtained for twenty-five cents (25 ) per page, or the current rate charged for copies at the time of the request. SECTION III. PROCEDURE AND APPEAL INFORMATION Notice: Notice mailed to: X The applicant and owners X Owner of record within the required distance X Affected government agencies Final Decision: THIS DECISION IS FINAL ON NOVEMBER 25, 2003 AND BECOMES EFFECTIVE ON DECEMBER 12, 2003 UNLESS AN APPEAL IS FILED. AAp eal: The Director's Decision is final on the date that it is mailed. All persons entitled to notice or who are otherwise adversely affected or aggrieved by the decision as provided in Section 18.390.040.G.1 may appeal this decision in accordance with Section 18.390.040.G.2 of the Tigard Community Development Code which provides that a written appeal together with the required fee shall be filed with the Director within ten (10) business days of the date the Notice of Decision was mailed. The appeal fee schedule and forms are available from the Planning Division of Tigard City Hall, 13125 SW Hall Boulevard, Tigard, Oregon 97223. Unless the applicant is the appellant, the hearing on an appeal from the Director's Decision shall be confined to the specific issues identified in the written comments submitted by the parties during the comment eriod. Additional evidence concerning issues properly raised in the Notice of Appeal may be submitted by any party during the appeal hearing, subject to any additional rules of procedure that may be adopted from time to time by the appellate body. THE DEADLINE FOR FILING AN APPEAL IS 5:00 PM ON DECEMBER 11, 2003. Questions: For further information please contact the Planning Division Staff Planner, Mathew Scheidegger at (503) 639-4171, Tigard City Hall, 13125 SW Hall Boulevard, Tigard, Oregon 97223. IL __ _ 91.11 CITY 1.1' CITY OI,.,....a«.nw Milimbio. MI nature liar SDR2003-00008 • ,, \ r MINUTEMAN PRESS La ill itillitillit A litagilli 1 I I s.„4"41411 /It N AN 111li C'iryof TigW Dab . Ma -00 13.2003.1.WrociMAGIC03.0PR ail y to f _fo z a o.:x 0 iz. Lin l w.,.....1... ` I O 1 >_ i_ 6 U _ 11111 I:e. 1)617 WHAM ST CITY OF TIGARD t L SDR2003-0000[7 SITE 'PLAN MINUTEMAN PRESS (Map is not to scale) N • 2S101BD-00100 2S101AB-01502 EXHIBIT. ACKERLY COMMUNICATIONS OF HERMOSO LLC THE NORTHWEST INC PO BOX 1876 3601 6TH AVE S LAKE OSWEGO,OR 97035 SEATTLE,WA 98134 2S101AB-01800 2S101AB-01501 BOEHM GENE G BEATRICE G JOENS JOHN D MARJORIE A 7380 SW HERMOSA WAY PMB 130 TIGARD,OR 97223 944 VETERANS WAY#105 REDMOND,OR 97756 2S 101 AB-02704 2S 101 AB-01402 CAYTON CAROL J LIVING TRUST LYMAN RODNEY C MARGARET BY CAYTON CAROL J TR 7720 SW ELLERMAN LN 7772 NORTH AMETHYST DR DURHAM,OR 97224 TIGARD,WA 84770 2S 101 AB-01403 2S 101 BA-00401 COLWELL GREGGORY W MARTIN GORDON R&SHEILA 7435 SW HERMOSO WAY 12265 SW 72ND TIGARD,OR 97223 TIGARD,OR 97223 2S 101 BA-00200 2S 101 BA-00300 COSTCO WHOLESALE CORPORATION MARTIN GORDON RICHARD& ATTN:EXCISE TAX DEPT 111 MARTIN GORDON STEVEN 999 LAKE DR PO BOX 740 ISSAQUAH,WA 98027 GLENEDEN BEACH,OR 97388 2S 101 AB-02705 2S 101 AB-01400 EAGLE HARDWARE&GARDEN INC MARTIN GORDON S& ATTN:TAX DEPT(TA3) MARTIN GORDON R PO BOX 1111 BY IPM NORTH WILKESBORO,NC 28656 721 SW OAK ST#100 PORTLAND,OR 97205 2 101 AB-02702 2S 101 AB-02703 EA HARDW• ' &GARDEN INC MCCAFFERY HUGH R&NANCY J TRS ATTN:T• .! PT(TA3) 7450 SW BEVELAND ST STE 100 PO B• 1111 TIGARD,OR 97223 5 TH WILKESBO 0,NC 28656 2S 101 AB-02701 2S 101 AB-01401 EA HARDW &GARDEN INC PHILLIPS JASON E/CAROLYN L ATTN:T PT(TA3) 7355 SW HERMOSO WAY PO B 1111 TIGARD,OR 97223 TH WILKESB 0,NC 28656 2S 101 AB-02700 2S 101 AB-01607 EA HARD E&GARDEN INC RAND STEPHEN C ATTN:T PT(TA3) 7540 SW HERMOSO WAY PO B 1111 TIGARD,OR 97223 TH WILKESBORO,NC 28656 2S 101 AB-01600 2S 101 AB-01606 ERDLE WILLIAM J ROBERTS KAREN M 7405 SW BEVELAND RD 7355 SW BEVELAND RD TIGARD,OR 97223 PORTLAND,OR 97223 2S101AB-01700 ROTH ALAN D AND LINDA A 7420 SW HERMOSO WAY TIGARD,OR 97223 2S101AB-01605 ROVIG CAROLE A 7460 SW HERMOSO WAY TIGARD,OR 97223 2S 101 AB-01500 SJP LLC 7615 SW BEVELAND RD TIGARD,OR 97223 2S 101 AB-01604 STOBER LOUIE A&JESSIE L 7305 SW BEVELAND RD TIGARD,OR 97223 2S 101 AB-01609 TRIANGLE PROPERTIES 7505 SW BEVELAND RD TIGARD,OR 97223 2S 101 AB-01404 VONRENCHLER MARVIN J& MARY E 7475 SW HERMOSO WAY TIGARD,OR 97223 2S 101 AC-01900 WASHINGTON COUNTY SCHOOL DISTRICT NO.23 6960 SW SANDBURG ST TIGARD,OR 97223 2S 101 AB-01608 WESTERN TIGARD HOLDINGS LLC 20019 SW ATEN RD BEAVERTON,OR 97007 2S1o1AB-01601 WHITNEY EUGENE P PATRICIA M 7340 SW HERMOSA WY TIGARD,OR 97223 0 . , Jack Biethan 11023 SW Summerfield Drive, #4 Tigard, OR 97224 Sue Rorman 11250 SW 82nd Avenue Tigard, OR 97223 Naomi Gallucci 11285 SW 78th Avenue Tigard, OR 97223 Michael Trigoboff 7072 SW Barbara Lane Tigard, OR 97223 Dieter Jacobs 7775 SW Spruce Street Tigard, OR 97223 Alexander Craghead 12205 SW Hall Boulevard Tigard, OR 97223-6210 David Chapman 9840 SW Landau Place Tigard, OR 97223 Nathan and Ann Murdock PO Box 231265 Tigard, OR 97281 Brad Spring 7555 SW Spruce Street Tigard, OR 97223 CITY OF TIGARD - EAST CIT SUBCOMMITTEE (i:Icurpin\setup\labels\CIT East.doc) UPDATED: April 18, 2002 AFFIDAVIT OF MAILING CITY OF TIGARD Community(Development Shaping Better Community I, cPatricta L. Lunford, being first duly sworn/affirm, on oath depose and say that I am a Senior Administrative Specialist for the City of Tigard, Washington County, Oregon and that I served the following: (Check Appropnate Box(s)Below} E3 NOTICE OF PENDING LAND USE APPLICATION FOR: SDR2003-00008/MINUTEMAN PRESS AMENDED NOTICE (File No/Name Reference) E City of Tigard Planning Director A copy of the said notice being hereto attached, marked Exhibit"A", and by reference made a part hereof, was mailed to each named person(s) at the address(s) shown on the attached list(s), marked Exhibit"B", and by reference made a part hereof, on October 14,2003, and deposited in the United States Mail on October 14,2003, postage prepaid. 7 / • d _iw . .m.,....,.,-,... /d2W---, (Person tha 'repared Noti.-) SVA'Itf. OE o GoN ) County off Washington )ss. City of 72gard ) Subscribed and sworn/affir ed before me on the //1 day of // V 1 , 2003. .„-_ R PUBLIC I F 0 ^---`-” OFFICIAL SEAL TA C l' - J BENGTC OREGON My Commission Expires: //)-7/'J ) `�> NOTARY PURL 868086 COMMISSION NO. 27,2007 MY CO EXHIBIT A NOTICE TO MORTGAGEE, LIENHOLDER,VENDOR OR SELLER: THE TIGARD DEVELOPMENT CODE REQUIRES THAT IF YOU RECEIVE THIS NOTICE,IT SHALL BE PROMPTLY FORWARDED TO THE PURCHASER. NOTICE F PENDING LAND USE APPLICATION Alto SITE DEVELOPMENT REVIEW CITY OF TIGARD Community(Development Shaping,`I Better Community DATE OF NOTICE: October 14, 2003 FILE NUMBER: SITE DEVELOPMENT REVIEW (SDR) 2003-00008 Type II Land Use Application FILE NAME: MINUTEMAN PRESS PROPOSAL: The applicant is requesting Site Development Review approval to construct a 7,250 square foot commercial office building and associated site improvement. A 1,673 square foot residence currently occupies the site and is proposed to be removed. ZONE: MUE: Mixed-Use Employment. The MUE zoning district is designed to apply to a majority of the land within the Tigard Triangle, a regional mixed-use employment district bounded by Pacific Highway (Hwy. 99), Highway 217 and 1-5. This zoning district permits a wide range of uses including major retail goods and services, business/professional offices, civic uses and housing; the latter includes multi-family housing at a maximum density of 25 units/acre, equivalent to the R-25 zoning district. APPLICABLE REVIEW CRITERIA: Community Development Code Chapters 18.360, 18.390, 18.520, 18.620, 18.705, 18.725, 18.745, 18.755, 18.765, 18.780, 18.790, 18.795 and 18.810. LOCATION: 7545 SW Hermoso Way; WCTM 2S101AB, Tax Lot 1501. YOUR RIGHT TO PROVIDE WRITTEN COMMENTS: Prior to the City making any decision on the Application, you are hereby provided a fourteen (14) day period to submit written comments on the application to the City. THE FOURTEEN (14) DAY PERIOD ENDS AT 5:00 PM ON OCTOBER 28, 2003. All comments should be directed to Mathew Scheideqqer, Associate Planner in the Planning Division at the City of Tigard, 13125 SW Hall Boulevard, Tigard, Oregon 97223. You may reach the City of Tigard by telephone at (503) 639-4171 or by e-mail to mattsci.tiqard.or.us. ALL COMMENTS MUST BE RECEIVED BY THE CITY OF TIGARD IN WRITING PRIOR TO 5:00 PM ON THE DATE SPECIFIED ABOVE IN ORDER FOR YOUR COMMENTS TO BE CONSIDERED IN THE DECISION MAKING PROCESS THE CITY OF TIGARD APPRECIATES RECEIVING COMMENTS AND VALUES YOUR INPUT. COMMENTS WILL BE CONSIDERED AND ADDRESSED WITHIN THE NOTICE OF DECISION. A DECISION ON THIS ISSUE IS TENTATIVELY SCHEDULED FOR NOVEMBER 20, 2003. IF YOU PROVIDE COMMENTS, YOU WILL BE SENT A COPY OF THE FULL DECISION ONCE IT HAS BEEN RENDERED. WRITTEN COMMENTS WILL BECOME A PART OF THE PERMANENT PUBLIC RECORD AND SHALL CONTAIN THE FOLLOWING INFORMATION: • Address the specific "Applicable Review Criteria" described in the section above or any other criteria believed to be applicable to this proposal; • Raise any issues and/or concerns believed to be important with sufficient evidence to allow the City to provide a response; • Comments that provide the basis for an appeal to the Tigard Hearings Officer must address the relevant approval criteria with sufficient specificity on that issue. Failure of any party to address the relevant approval criteria with sufficient specificity may preclude subsequent appeals to the Land Use Board of Appeals or Circuit Court on that issue. Specific findings directed at the relevant approval criteria are what constitute relevant evidence. AFTER THE 14 DAY COMMENT PERIOD CLOSES, THE DIRECTOR SHALL ISSUE A TYPE II ADMINISTRATIVE DECISION. THE DIRECTOR'S DECISION SHALL BE MAILED TO THE APPLICANT AND TO OWNERS OF RECORD OF PROPERTY LOCATED WITHIN 500 FEET OF THE SUBJECT SITE, AND TO ANYONE ELSE WHO SUBMITTED WRITTEN COMMENTS OR WHO IS OTHERWISE ENTITLED TO NOTICE. THE DIRECTOR'S DECISION SHALL ADDRESS ALL OF THE RELEVANT APPROVAL CRITERIA. BASED UPON THE CRITERIA AND THE FACTS CONTAINED WITHIN THE RECORD, THE DIRECTOR SHALL APPROVE, APPROVE WITH CONDITIONS OR DENY THE REQUESTED PERMIT OR ACTION. SUMMARY OF THE DECISION-MAKING PROCESS: . The application is accepted by the City . Notice is sent to property owners of record within 500 feet of the proposed development area allowing a 14-day written comment period. . The application is reviewed by City Staff and affected agencies. . City Staff issues a written decision. . Notice of the decision is sent to the Applicant and all owners or contract purchasers of record of the site; all owners of record of property located within 500 feet of the site, as shown on the most recent property tax assessment roll; any City-recognized neighborhood group whose boundaries include the site; and any governmental agency which is entitled to notice under an intergovernmental agreement entered into with the City which includes provision for such notice or anyone who is otherwise entitled to such notice. INFORMATION/EVIDENCE AVAILABLE FOR REVIEW: The application, written comments and supporting documents relied upon by the Director to make this decision are contained within the record and are available for public review at the City of Tigard Community Development Department. Copies of these items may be obtained at a cost of $.25 per page or the current rate charged for this service. Questions regarding this application should be directed to the Planning Staff indicated on the first page of this Notice under the section titled "Your Right to Provide Written Comments." \-, -7-1M11.11alagillii f �� vicINITY MAP NM DAR SDR2003-00008 ---� I MINUTEMAN PRESS Ilk / r _____7 _, , / / .. �� .... --, / la 111111111111 I I'- 1 ANO $ al�<< l I _ x� . 1 �� Re/ELAND . r O na.,,n.w. 5 '• •I I , TNZAGA g' A N .� o .00 zoo bo .00 500■•n sw/ `_ I ing f Tigard 1 ` \\ rw.Ciry os Mw w WIM VIMMr k NDMOID M A, tI ni10 WWI • y 2S101BD-00100 2S101AB-01502 ACKERLY COMMUNICATIONS OF HERMOSO LLC EXHIBIT, THE NORTHWEST INC PO BOX 1876 3601 6TH AVE S LAKE OSWEGO,OR 97035 SEATTLE,WA 98134 2S101AB-01800 2S101AB-01501 BOEHM GENE G BEATRICE G JOENS JOHN D MARJORIE A 7380 SW HERMOSA WAY PMB 130 TIGARD,OR 97223 944 VETERANS WAY#105 REDMOND,OR 97756 2S101AB-02704 2S101AB-01402 CAYTON CAROL J LIVING TRUST LYMAN RODNEY C MARGARET BY CAYTON CAROL J TR 7720 SW ELLERMAN LN 7772 NORTH AMETHYST DR DURHAM,OR 97224 TIGARD,WA 84770 2S 101 AB-01403 2S 101 BA-00401 COLWELL GREGGORY W MARTIN GORDON R&SHEILA 7435 SW HERMOSO WAY 12265 SW 72ND TIGARD,OR 97223 TIGARD,OR 97223 2S 101 BA-00200 2S101 BA-00300 COSTCO WHOLESALE CORPORATION MARTIN GORDON RICHARD& ATTN:EXCISE TAX DEPT 111 MARTIN GORDON STEVEN 999 LAKE DR PO BOX 740 ISSAQUAH,WA 98027 GLENEDEN BEACH,OR 97388 2S101AB-02705 2S101AB-01400 EAGLE HARDWARE&GARDEN INC MARTIN GORDON S& ATTN:TAX DEPT(TA3) MARTIN GORDON R PO BOX 1111 BY IPM NORTH WILKESBORO,NC 28656 721 SW OAK ST#100 PORTLAND,OR 97205 2 101 AB-02702 2S 101 AB-02703 EA HARDW• • &GARDEN INC MCCAFFERY HUGH R&NANCY J TRS ATTN:T• . PT(TA3) 7450 SW BEVELAND ST STE 100 PO B• 1111 TIGARD,OR 97223 •TH WILKESBO 0,NC 28656 2S101AB-02701 2S101AB-01401 EAt. HARDW. &GARDEN INC PHILLIPS JASON E/CAROLYN L ATTN:T . PT(TA3) 7355 SW HERMOSO WAY PO B• 1111 TIGARD,OR 97223 •TH WILKESB••O,NC 28656 2S 101 AB-02700 2S 101 AB-01607 EA HARD E&GARDEN INC RAND STEPHEN C ATTN:T PT(TA3) 7540 SW HERMOSO WAY PO B 1111 TIGARD,OR 97223 TH WILKESBORO,NC 28656 2S101AB-01600 2S101AB-01606 ERDLE WILLIAM J ROBERTS KAREN M 7405 SW BEVELAND RD 7355 SW BEVELAND RD TIGARD,OR 97223 PORTLAND,OR 97223 2S 101 AB-01700 ROTH ALAN D AND LINDA A BOB DAVIDSON 7420 SW HERMOSO WAY MINUTEMAN PRESS TIGARD,OR 97223 14285 SW PACIFIC HIGHWAY TIGARD. OR 97224 2S101AB-01605 ROVIG CAROLE A RORY ANTIS 7460 SW HERMOSO WAY TIGARD,OR 97223 GRAY PURCELL. INC. PO Box 23516 PORTLAND. OR 97281-3516 2S 101 AB-01500 SJP LLC 7615 SW BEVELAND RD TIGARD,OR 97223 2S 101 AB-01604 STOBER LOUIE A&JESSIE L 7305 SW BEVELAND RD TIGARD,OR 97223 2S 101 AB-01609 TRIANGLE PROPERTIES 7505 SW BEVELAND RD TIGARD,OR 97223 2S 101 AB-01404 VONRENCHLER MARVIN J& MARY E 7475 SW HERMOSO WAY TIGARD,OR 97223 2S 101 AC-01900 WASHINGTON COUNTY SCHOOL DISTRICT NO.23 6960 SW SANDBURG ST TIGARD,OR 97223 2S 101 AB-01608 WESTERN TIGARD HOLDINGS LLC 20019 SW ATEN RD BEAVERTON,OR 97007 2S101AB-01601 WHITNEY EUGENE P PATRICIA M 7340 SW HERMOSA WY TIGARD,OR 97223 Jack Biethan 11023 SW Summerfield Drive, #4 Tigard, OR 97224 Sue Rorman 11250 SW 82nd Avenue Tigard, OR 97223 Naomi Gallucci 11285 SW 78th Avenue Tigard, OR 97223 Michael Trigoboff 7072 SW Barbara Lane Tigard, OR 97223 Dieter Jacobs 7775 SW Spruce Street Tigard, OR 97223 Alexander Craghead 12205 SW Hall Boulevard Tigard, OR 97223-6210 David Chapman 9840 SW Landau Place Tigard, OR 97223 Nathan and Ann Murdock PO Box 231265 Tigard, OR 97281 Brad Spring 7555 SW Spruce Street Tigard, OR 97223 CITY OF TIGARD - EAST CIT SUBCOMMITTEE (i:\curpin\setup\labels\CIT East.doc) UPDATED: April 18, 2002 4. AFFIDAVIT OF POSTING NOTICE OF A LAND USE PROPOSAL IMPORTANT NOTICE: THIS AFFIDAVIT MUST BE ACCOMPANIED BY A COPY OF THE NOTICE THAT WAS POSTED ON THE SITE. In the Matter of the Proposed Land Use Applications for: Land Use File Nos.: SDR2003-00008 Land Use File Name: MINUTEMAN PRESS I, Mathew Scheidegger, Associate Planner for the City of Tigard, do affirm that I posted notice of the land use proposal affecting the land located at (state the approximate location(s) IF no address(s) and/or tax lot(s) currently registered) i. and did personally post notice of the proposed land use application(s) by means of weatherproof posting in the general vicinity of the affected territory, a copy of said notice being hereto attached and by reference made a part hereof, on the 0 day of , 2003. .. l , /•--�- Sign. ur'o •er on Wh• - •rformed Posting (In the presence of the Notary) (THIS SECTION FOR A STATE OF OREGON, NOTARY PUBLIC TO COMPLETE/NOTARIZE) STATE OF OREGON ) County of Washington ) ss. Subscribed and sworn/affirmed before me on the d Ise- day of DC:FD ber , 20 o3 . c Z' OFFICIAL SEAL z k. CF?E?1"1 A CAINES .j NO ffi.R'r SIGN NO.37160 N ClittLij— d . ea.'S C(1 Y:41fSSION NO.371603 MY CCMM!SS!ON EXPIRES AUG. 14,2007 — NOTARY PUBLIC OF OREGON My Commission Expires: / \tcj GC5f 11, a o6 7 h:\login\patty\masters\affidavit of posting for applicant to post public hearing.doc MINUTEMAN PRESS SITE DEVELOPMENT REVIEW (SDR) 2003 -00008 REQUEST: The applicant is requesting Site Development Review approval to construct a 7,250 square foot commercial office building and associated site improvement. A 1 ,673 square foot residence currently occupies the site and is proposed to be removed. LOCATION: 7545 SW Hermoso Way; WCTM 2S101AB, Tax Lot 1501 . ZONE: MUE: Mixed-Use Employment. The MUE zoning district is designed to apply to a majority of the land within the Tigard Triangle, a regional mixed- use employment district bounded by Pacific Highway (Hwy. 99), Highway 217 and 1-5. This zoning district permits a wide range of uses including major retail goods and services, business/professional offices, civic uses and housing; the latter includes multi-family housing at a maximum density of 25 units/acre, equivalent to the R-25 zoning district. APPLICABLE REVIEW CRITERIA: Community Development Code Chapters 18.360, 18.390, 18.520, 18.620, 18.705, 18.725, 18.745, 18.755, 18.765, 18.780, 18.790, 18.795 and 18.810. Further information may be obtained from the Planning Division (staff contact: Mathew Scheidegger, Associate Planner) at 13125 SW Hall Blvd., Tigard, Oregon 97223, or by calling 503-639-4171 . A copy of the application and all documents and evidence submitted by or on behalf of the applicant and the applicable criteria are available for inspection at no cost and copies for all items can also be provided at a reasonable cost. _ CITY of TIGARD GEOGRAPHIC INFORMATION SYSTEM Illi III AREA NOTIFIED ill, (500') FOR: Mike Ke 11111i DARTMOUTH RE: 7545 Hermoso Way (2S I O I AB, 1501) iSMMASIMI Property owner information is valid for 3 months from / the date printed on this map. mnuuw, Mil III � � ERMOSO W:till eillillirmim ao eimailitsiit 4111 gralleBEVE* N illio„._ D ST o too 200 300 400 500 Feet I 1'=337 feet o m.uuvu Z IN. II. ..LJ GONZAGA ST City of Tigard ,A -- ■.. should verified on this map is ev general location only Di and should be verified with the Development Services Division. 13125 SW Hall Blvd l rgard.OR ardor I• (503)6394171 http:lAvww.ci.tigard.a.us Community Development Plot Aug•,,•0�'�i`�11 2Y1at�3./Y�R 2S101BD-00100 2S101AB-01502 ACKERLY COMMUNICATIONS OF HERMOSO LLC THE NORTHWEST INC PO BOX 1876 3601 6TH AVE S LAKE OSWEGO,OR 97035 SEATTLE,WA 98134 2S101AB-01800 25101AB-01501 BOEHM GENE G BEATRICE G JOENS JOHN D MARJORIE A 7380 SW HERMOSA WAY PMB 130 TIGARD,OR 97223 944 VETERANS WAY#105 REDMOND,OR 97756 2S 101 AB-02704 2S 101 AB-01402 CAYTON CAROL J LIVING TRUST LYMAN RODNEY C MARGARET BY CAYTON CAROL J TR 7720 SW ELLERMAN LN 7772 NORTH AMETHYST DR DURHAM,OR 97224 TIGARD,WA 84770 2S101AB-01403 2S101BA-00401 COLWELL GREGGORY W MARTIN GORDON R&SHEILA 7435 SW HERMOSO WAY 12265 SW 72ND TIGARD,OR 97223 TIGARD,OR 97223 25101 BA-00200 25101BA-00300 COSTCO WHOLESALE CORPORATION MARTIN GORDON RICHARD& ATTN:EXCISE TAX DEPT 111 MARTIN GORDON STEVEN 999 LAKE DR PO BOX 740 ISSAQUAH,WA 98027 GLENEDEN BEACH,OR 97388 2S101AB-02705 2S101AB-01400 EAGLE HARDWARE&GARDEN INC MARTIN GORDON S& ATTN:TAX DEPT(TA3) MARTIN GORDON R PO BOX 1111 BY IPM NORTH WILKESBORO,NC 28656 721 SW OAK ST#100 PORTLAND,OR 97205 2 01 AB-02702 2S 101 AB-02703 EA HARDW• ' &GARDEN INC MCCAFFERY HUGH R&NANCY J TRS ATTN:T• .' PT(TA3) 7450 SW BEVELAND ST STE 100 PO B• 1111 TIGARD,OR 97223 'TN WILKESBO 0,NC 28656 2S101AB-02701 2S101AB-01401 EA HARDW &GARDEN INC PHILLIPS JASON E/CAROLYN L ATTN:T PT(TA3) 7355 SW HERMOSO WAY PO B 1111 TIGARD,OR 97223 TH WILKESB 0,NC 28656 2S 101 AB-02700 25101 AB-01607 EA HARD E&GARDEN INC RAND STEPHEN C ATTN:T PT(TA3) 7540 SW HERMOSO WAY PO B 1111 TIGARD,OR 97223 TH WILKESBORO, NC 28656 2S101AB-01600 2S101AB-01806 ERDLE WILLIAM J ROBERTS KAREN M 7405 SW BEVELAND RD 7355 SW BEVELAND RD TIGARD,OR 97223 PORTLAND,OR 97223 2S 101 AB-01700 ROTH ALAN D AND LINDA A 7420 SW HERMOSO WAY TIGARD,OR 97223 2S101AB-01605 ROVIG CAROLE A 7460 SW HERMOSO WAY TIGARD,OR 97223 2S101AB-01500 SJP LLC 7615 SW BEVELAND RD TIGARD,OR 97223 2S 101 AB-01604 STOBER LOUIE A&JESSIE L 7305 SW BEVELAND RD TIGARD,OR 97223 2S 101 AB-01609 TRIANGLE PROPERTIES 7505 SW BEVELAND RD TIGARD,OR 97223 2S 101 AB-01404 VONRENCHLER MARVIN J& MARY E 7475 SW HERMOSO WAY TIGARD,OR 97223 2S 101 AC-01900 WASHINGTON COUNTY SCHOOL DISTRICT NO.23 6960 SW SANDBURG ST TIGARD,OR 97223 2S 101 AB-01608 WESTERN TIGARD HOLDINGS LLC 20019 SW ATEN RD BEAVERTON,OR 97007 2S101AB-01601 WHITNEY EUGENE P PATRICIA M 7340 SW HERMOSA WY TIGARD,OR 97223 Jack Biethan 11023 SW Summerfield Drive, #4 Tigard, OR 97224 Sue Rorman 11250 SW 82nd Avenue Tigard, OR 97223 Naomi Gallucci 11285 SW 78th Avenue Tigard, OR 97223 Michael Trigoboff 7072 SW Barbara Lane Tigard, OR 97223 Dieter Jacobs 7775 SW Spruce Street Tigard, OR 97223 Alexander Craghead 12205 SW Hall Boulevard Tigard, OR 97223-6210 David Chapman 9840 SW Landau Place Tigard, OR 97223 Nathan and Ann Murdock PO Box 231265 Tigard, OR 97281 Brad Spring 7555 SW Spruce Street Tigard, OR 97223 CITY OF TIGARD - EAST CIT SUBCOMMITTEE (i:\curpin\setup\labels\CIT East.doc) UPDATED: April 18, 2002 • CITY OF TIGARD 40. COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT ��.�'i�' PLANNING DIVISION CITY OF TIGARD 13125 SW HALL BOULEVARD Community TIGARD GARopment TIGARD, OREGON 91223 ShapingABetterCommunity PHONE. 503-639-4111 FAX: 503-684-1291 (Attn: Patty/Planning) RiEOUEi? JY OG• @@T P R? * Y @1NME:R MAL LW Property owner information is valid for 3 months from the date of your request INDICATE ALL PROJECT MAP & TAX LOT NUMBERS (i.e. 1S134AB, Tax Lot 00100) OR THE ADDRESSES FOR ALL PROJECT PARCELS BELOW: 7 5 (Q25/o/W,6, /,/) INDICATE WHETHER YOU ARE REQUESTING 1, 2 OR 3 SETS OF LABELS: '- (NOTE: A minimum of 2 sets of labels will be provided (unless only holding a neighborhood meeting at this time) to place on your 2 sets of envelopes that applicants are required to submit at the time of application submittal. If a neighborhood meeting is required and you have not yet held that meeting, you can request 3 sets provided your land use application will be submitted and deemed complete by the Planning Division within 3 months from this request.) NAME OF CONTACT PERSON: Wirt., kezn�r PHONE: C39- 6/2.? This request may be mailed, faxed or hand delivered to the City of Tigard. Please allow a 2-day minimum for processing requests. Upon completion of your request, the contact person will be called to pick up their request that will be placed in "Will Calr' by their last name, at the Community Development Reception Desk. The cost of processing your request must be paid at the time of pick up, as exact cost can not be pre-determined. PLEASE NOTE: BYT HE CITY VS. RE-TYPED MAILING LABELS WILL BE CCEPTED.PROVIDED Cost Description: $11 to generate the mailing list, plus$2 per sheet for printing the list onto labels(20 addresses per sheet). Then, multiply the cost to print one set of labels by the number of sets requested. *EXAMPLE.* **COST FOR THIS REQUEST ** 4 sheets of labels x$2/sheet= $8.00 x 2 sets= $16.00 sheet(s)of labels x$2/sheet= $ x sets= 2 sheets of labels x$2/sheet for CIT area x 2 sets= $ 4.00 / sheet(s)of labels x$2/sheet for CIT area= $ •x/sets= 2 GENERATE LIST =$11E. GENERATE LIST =$11.OQ,� TOTAL =$31.00 TOTAL $. • PRE-APP.HELD BY: CITY OF TIGARD PLANNING DIVISION 13125 SW HALL BOULEVARD TIGARD, OR 97223-8189 " • 503.639.4171!503.684,7297 CITY ETI OREGON N LAND USE PERMIT APPLICATION OREGON File# I3D.R 003- ocoo 8 I Other Case# I pp, aov. - oc' Date I C2'/ / -03 I By I C ea" s . Receipt# ( aov3 " 5 `j Date Application Complete TYPE OF PERMIT YOU ARE APPLYING FOR ❑AdjustmentNariance (I or II) ❑ Minor Land Partition (II) ❑ Zone Change (III) ❑ Comprehensive Plan Amendment (IV) ❑ Planned Development (III) ❑ Zone Change Annexation (IV) ❑ Conditional Use (III) ❑ Sensitive Lands Review (I, II or III) ❑Zone Ordinance Amendment (IV) ❑ Historic Overlay (II or III) ] Site Development Review (II) ❑ Home Occupation (II) ❑ Subdivision (II or III) LOCAL ION WHERE PROPOSED AC{IVII Y WILL OCCUR(Address if available) 7çL15 SW kr ;;so i,�y j—ryeti- , oil_ 97d 2 TAX MAP AX LOI NOS. )-POI SILL' AD — Tax L044-1f ) .. © 101 AL SI � ZONING ULASSI}ICAI ION t ^^fi�r )Z 50 R r O cI cc CO..t„ (CC64., APPLICAN I* MAILING ADORE S/CI I Y/S I A I t LI, \1 RD- 3o2r 435'4 Po 41A-A, 02 9”7,),3)-35,6 PHONE NU. FAX N O. So)— C39— EJ27 S°3 C39 - 6/30 PRIMARY-CONTACT PERSON PHONE NO. j l l(c. KE L,*-/i iZ Y i rrrt 503 - s'77 -. y I z PROPERI Y OWNEWDEED HOLDER(Attach list if more than one) nitnukMan Prc o-(-- ti 4 ..mot MAILING ADDRESS/Cll Y/S I Al /LIP 191Y.s �S�J P,-Gt r✓ Hsi W 11 A 0i2 FAX NO. PHONE NO. (54 C X23- s lo3 r/3"03 )6 0 -5So3 *When the owner and the applicant are different people, the applicant must be the purchaser of record or a lessee in possession with written authorization from the owner or an agent of the owner. The owners must sign this application in the space provided on the back of this form or submit a written authorization with this application. PROPOSAL SUMMARY(Please be specific) o.cc;ct1 ate,l� • APPLICATIONS WILL NOT BE ACCEPTED WITHOUT ALL OF THE REQUIRED SUBMITTAL ELEMENTS AS DESCRIBED IN THE "BASIC SUBMITTAL REQUIREMENTS" INFORMATION SHEET. THE APPLICANT SHALL CERTIFY THAT: ♦ If the application is granted, the applicant shall exercise the rights granted in accordance with the terms and subject to all the conditions and limitations of the approval. ♦ All the above statements and the statements in the plot plan, attachments, and exhibits transmitted herewith, are true; and the applicants so acknowledge that any permit issued, based on this application, map be revoked if it is found that any such statements are false. ♦ The applicant has read the entire contents of the application, including the policies and criteria, and understands the requirements for approving or denying the application(s). SIGNATURES OF EACH OWNER OF THE SUBJECT PROPERTY ARE REQUIRED. fl � X03 Owner's Signature Date Owner's Signature Date Owner's Signature Date Owner's Signature Date Owner's Signature Date Applicant/Agent/Representative's Signature Date Applicant/Agent/Representative's Signature Date STEWART TITLE OF OREGON, INC. stewart 2020 SW Fourth Avenue, Suite 190 title of oregor. Portland, OR 97201 Phone: (503) 290-5500 • Fax: (503) 290-5576 Date: October 11, 2002 Our Order No. 200204494 PRELIMINARY TITLE REPORT FOR INSURANCE PROPERTY ADDRESS: 7545 SW Hermoso Way Tigard, Oregon 97223 Stewart Title of Oregon, Inc. Attention: Toni McCardle 2020 SW Fourth Avenue, Suite 190 Portland, Oregon 97201 Liability Premium ALTA Owner's Policy Standard $325,000.00 $1,010.00 ALTA Loan Policy Extended $292,500.00 $332.75 Government Service Fee $50.00 Endorsements: 7.4&7.11 (100 & 116) $50.00 (Early Issue) To Be Determined Stewart Title of Oregon, Inc. is prepared to issue on request and on recording of the appropriate documents, a policy or policies as applied for, with coverage's as indicated, based on this preliminary report that as of September 27, 2002 at 8:00 A.M. title to the property described is vested in: John D. Joens and Marjorie A. Joens, as tenants by the entirety Subject only to the exceptions shown herein and to the terms, conditions and exceptions contained in the policy form. No liability is assumed until a full premium has been paid. LEGAL DESCRIPTION: FOR LEGAL DESCRIPTION SEE EXHIBIT 'A' Page 1 of 5 Order Number: 200204494 SCHEDULE B GENERAL EXCEPTIONS 1. Taxes or assessments which are not shown as existing liens by the records of any taxing authority that levies taxes or assessments on real property or by the public records. Proceedings by a public agency which may result in taxes or assessments, or notices of such proceedings, whether or not shown by the records of such agency or by the public records. 2. Any facts, rights, interest, or claims which are not shown by the public records but which could be ascertained by an inspection of the land or by making inquiry of persons in possession thereof. 3. (a) Unpatented mining claims, (b) reservations or exceptions in patents or in Acts authorizing the issuance thereof; (c) water rights, claims or title to water; whether or not the matters excepted under (a), (b) or (c) are shown by the public records. 4. Discrepancies, conflicts in boundary lines, shortage in area, encroachments, or any other facts which a survey would disclose, and which are not shown by public records. 5. Statutory liens or other liens or encumbrances, or claims thereof, which are not shown by the public records. CURRENT EXCEPTIONS 6. 2002-2003 taxes, a lien not yet payable. 7. City liens, if any, of the City of Tigard. We find none as of September 27, 2002. 8. Pending assessment as disclosed by instrument: Recorded : September 3, 1999 Fee No. : 99103238 For : Sanitary sewer Estimated Amount : See recorded document for details 9. The herein described premises are within the boundaries of and subject to the statutory powers, including the power of assessment of Clean Water Services, formerly known as Unified Sewerage Agency. 10 Conditions and Restrictions, including the terms and provisions thereof, established by City of Tigard: Resolution No. : 99-63 Recorded : September 3, 1999 Fee No. : 99103238 11. Parties in possession, or claiming to be in possession, other than the vestees shown herein. For the purpose of ALTA Extended coverage, we will require an Affidavit of Possession be completed and returned to us. Exception may be taken to such matters as may be shown thereby. Page 2 of 5 Order Number: 200204494 • 12. Statutory liens for labor or materials, including liens for contributions due to the State of Oregon for unemployment compensation and for workmen's compensation, which have now gained or hereafter may gain priority over the lien of the insured mortgage where no notice of such liens appear of record. 13. An accurate survey of these premises showing boundary lines, and location of improvements and easements, should be furnished for our review prior to our writing an ALTA Extended Policy. Exception may be taken to such matters as may be shown thereby. NOTE: We find no Completion Notice of record as of the date of this report. y NOTE: We find no judgments or Federal Tax Liens against Robert C. Davidson or Ruth A. Davidson. NOTE: Taxes paid in full for 2001-2002: Levied Amount : $2,199.29 Account No. : R457197 Levy Code : 023.81 Map No. : 2S 11 AB-01501 NOTE: Washington County Ordinance No. 193, recorded May 13, 1977 in Washington County, Oregon, imposes a tax of$1.00 per$1,000.00 or fraction thereof on the transfer of real property located within Washington County. After the issuance of a preliminary title report or preliminary commitment, if a transaction is consummated in reliance thereon, but without requiring the issuance of the title policy applied for, the full scheduled charge applicable to the type of coverage normally issued on such transaction will apply. Page 3 of 5 Order Number: 200204494 Stewart Title of Oregon, Inc. C lift V�2l1x.0 zi n V. Adviso Mlle J Øory fficer Phone: (503) 290-5534 Fax: (503) 290-5578 Email: jszidon @stewart.com JH/gac If you have any questions regarding this report or your escrow, please contact your Escrow Officer, Toni McCardle at (503) 290-5522. cc: Robert C. Davidson cc: Ruth A. Davidson cc: John D. Joens cc: Marjorie A. Joens cc: Waters Realty, Inc. Attn: Dave Waters cc: Meadows Group Realtors, Inc. Attn: Neal Brown cc: Waters Realty, Inc./Closing Coordinator cc: Meadows Group Realtors, Inc./Closing Coordinator Page 4 of 5 Order Number: 200204494 EXHIBIT "A" Lot 21, HERMOSO PARK, in the City of Tigard, County of Washington and State of Oregon. Page 5 of 5 Order Number: 200204494 S'''-WART TITLE OF OREGON, IN^ N ' 11.314 This skc...n is not intended to show all matters related to the p._,.crty including,but not limited to area,dimensions,easements,encroachments or location of boundaries. It is not a part of,nor does it modify,the W E commitment or policy to which it is attached. The company asumes NO LIABILITY for any matter related to this sketch. Reference should be made to an accurate survey for further information. S MAP NUMBER: 2S10IAB 01501 00 „yam-r-„..1,r,' k 13. 00'w. ill 1404 r<<�;r.:�r.;,...- w 14 14 • 1403 0� z •a, • . 14 • 1401 ., 8 1300 7 6 ir 5 o:? 4 • � 3 o toy • ,, .`1• �` °— too, $ , 00' �, � H ERMDSo �� 07 , Y ,,.,.. � t.a.16 6 roo' ,� w. •s• WA l i rt2i ..,,, ; roo• 2t� _ I ro... I�0 1� ro 160fr0 1501 .;• 16. �? 211—� N -r 9 $ c '0 $ 1�1� 11 J 1 12 . v 23 13 , ii i roo' . 100' r cos MY :. N.•4•tt'rc Z /609 no' roo roo' rt t•. $ .; 1502 : 1608 Ito' too. 2S it s„,g i „ 1600 rro' • 1606 Ito' • 22 1604 ■ N ., • ai=' 20 $ a .; k, , Nov S 19 8 4' t.e; so' A'm' d 4 ; 18 _ 17 e �. 4`''' • 16 S $ ',� „o, S. W rro' z- >ti sr 2700 !0 rro ...t2 8 EVELAND ,,e. 2 ii 701 2702 ,tit,. a 2703 — --0-- RDAD 24 2704 , �— ;e 25 y R 2705s0 7/6—•, • 26 P , 27A 28R ± I1 270 29 30 0 . '. .._./-- /y.�y v.. . S. •e•37.1. '_ ,%iJ'ii}yr�frlihiiGV,�ii• its.. Se~'_ MAP FOR ASSESSMENT PURPOSES ONLY 2S I I DO NOT RELY ON FOR ANY OTHER USE t1JJ1JL1116 VV1lultuttlll1, -/11,6'vtl la1,vllv1111t+ LX. livlill11u111Ly JJV Y■,1vq1111V11L L\+r/GLL 1.1111v111 i u5V I vi i-r f nW0tl >`:conomic Community Development Department 775 Summer 5:, Ste 200•Salem,OR 97301.12SL. 1-110e-233-3300(1n Crew'only)•TT!and=nc-e=O3•J&S-C 123 ASS 15 i Assisting Commuagles Assisttng flushness Economic Data. Aews a People Links SFte=Index Ewalt Corn m Li Tigard Community Profile Information in the Co 13125 SW Hall Blvd, Tigard, OR 97223 • Phone 503-639-4171 • Fax 503- Profiles was derived f 684-7297 sources, including hoc Web Page http://www.ci.tigard.or.us/• E-Mail: cathy @ci.tigard.or.us and federal sources. T Economic and Comm City Location Development Departr County(ies): Washington Incorporated in 1961 cannot accept respons Location: North Willamette Valley errors or omissions. and comments may bf Nearest Major Highway and Distance: I-5 I Local to the department by t miles 1-800-233-3306 (in C Nearest Major City and Distance: fax 503-581-5115 or 1 Tualatin 15 miles, Estimated Drive Time: 15 minutes oedd.info @state.or.us Distance to Portland: 10 miles Profile Topi Source: Oregon Department of Transportation,State of Oregon Map; Oregon Blue Book Climate Population Community Age Grog Recreational Amenities Housing Golf, swimming, boating, fishing, Hagg Lake, parks, wineries, 222 acres of Industries and Produc land set aside for public use and the enjoyment of nature. Demographic Data 5 Largest Employers Planning a vacation or a tour through an area of Oregon? Visit the Oregon Economic Developmt Tourism Commission's web site at http://www.traveloregon.com/for more Education information. Financial Institutions Taxes Source: City Administration,local chamber of commerce,local convention and visitor Business Taxes bureau Public Safety Community Commun Planning/Zoning Climate Infrastructure/Tran Elevation: 250' Measurement Location: Portland Water Supply Wastewater Treatmen Temperature: Utilities: Monthly Ave. Low: 36°F Monthly Ave. High: 79°F Telecommunications Hottest Month August Coldest Month January Driest Month Natural Gas & Electri July Wettest Month December Transportation Average annual precipitation: 43.150" Profiles Home Page Humidity (Hour 10, local time): Average July afternoon humidity: 62% Average January afternoon Login to undate my a .../FMPro?-db=Community.fp4&-Format=forms.htm&-lay=webpage&-op=eq&sort%20nam 10/11/2002 assisting uommumnes--uregon economic & uommunity veveiopment uepartment rage z or i4 humidity: 82% Home Page Source: Oregon Climate Service Demographics Population 1980 1990 1998 1999 2000 2001 City of Tigard 14,286 29,435 37,200 37,670 41,223 43,040 Washington County 245,808 311,554 397,600 404,750 445,342 455,800 Sources: 1980, 1990,2000 US Census; 1998, 1999,2001 Center for Population Research and Census,Portland State University. 0 indicates data is unavailable. Washington County 727 sq miles 627 persons/sq Sources:figures based on 2001 PSU mile population estimates; Oregon Bluebook county square mileage Community Age Groups 1970 1980 1990 2000 Under 5 years 607 1,078 2,341 3,232 5-19 years 1,317 3,085 5,404 8,241 20-44 years 2,337 6,200 13,603 16,781 45-64 years 793 2,471 4,676 8,733 65+ years 371 1,452 3,320 4,274 Median Age 0 0 33 41.4 Source: US Census,0 or N/A indicates data is not available. Median value is the middle value,not an average. Housing .../FMPro?-db=Community.fp4&-Format=forms.htm&-lay=vebpage&-op=eq&sort%20nam 10/11/2002 ttJJtSLi11g L UIIuh1u111L1cJ--lJ1cgvll 1I111l win), J V I,IUp111■,L1L 1-"wpCU1.1111•111. I QV,J vi iT Median Value of Total Housing Owner-Occupied Units 1970 1980 1990 2000 Housing, 2000 City of Tigard 3,852 7,956 12,599 17,386 $97,400 Washington 46,085 89,348 124,716 178,913 $184,800 County Also visit Housing and City of Tigard 2000 Housing Breakout: Community Services Web Site: Vacancy Rate: 6% Median Owner http://www.hcs.state.or.us/ Cost Owner 319 (mortgaged): $1,361 Occupied: Renter 172 Median Gross $673 Occupied: Rent: Source: US Census. Median value is the middle value,not an average. Economic Development and Employment Principal Industries of the County(ies): Washington County—Agriculture, business services, manufacturing (rubber& plastic; industrial machine & equipment, instruments, electronics) Source: Oregon Employment Department,Covered Employment and Payroll Reports, 1998 Agricultural Products of the Area (Top 3 largest gross farm sales): Washington County—Specialty products, grass and legume seeds, small fruits and berries Source: Oregon State University,Extension Economic Information Office Total Number of Manufacturing Companies in the County: Washington 894 County Source: Oregon Employment Department,Covered Employment and Payroll Reports, 1998 Total Number of Manufacturing Companies in the City: Source: City Administration .../FMPro?-db=Community.fp4&-Format=forms.htm&-lay=webpage&-op=eq&sort%20nam 10/11/2002 Assisting uommuniues--uregon tconomic 6c uommunuy ueveiopment vepartment rage 4 01 14 • Economic Indicators Washington County Oregon 1999 2000 1999 2000 2001 Population 404,750 445,342 3,306,000 3,421,399 3,471,700 Labor Force 245190 251830 1,761,000 1,802,938 1,793,773 Total Employment 235310 243630 1,660,080 1,715,453 1,679,914 Unemployment 9,890 8,200 100,360 87,485 113,859 Unemployment Rate 4% 3.3% 5.7% 4.9% 6.3% Non-Farm Payroll Employment 944,600 964,100 1,575,100 1,606,800 1,596,100 Total Covered Employment 214,805 224,015 1,577,666 1,607,944 N/A Total Covered Payroll ($ thousands county/ $8,419,854 $9,959,881 $48,698 $52,701 N/A $ millions state) Ave. Annual Payroll Per Employee $39,198 $44,461 $30,867 $32,776 N/A Number of Business Units 13,199 12,901 111,047 108,432 N/A Total Personal Income($ millions) $12,908 N/A $85,800 $94,999 $98,500 Annual Per Capita Personal Income $31,537 N/A $26,000 $27,649 28,400 Assessed Value of Property ($ millions) $35,484 $38,376 $186,642 $198,911 N/A Residential Construction Building Permits 3,267 3,831 23,249 19,877 21,049 Value ($ thousands) $430,254 $466,146 $2,653 $2,533 $2,985 Travel Expenditures ($ millions) $319,400 $359,700 $5,520 $6,069 $6,111 Travel-Related Employment 5,110 5,440 91,200 95,300 94,100 Preliminary Data Sources: Oregon Employment Department;Center for Population Research&Census,PSU;U.S.Census Bureau;Bureau of Economic Analysis;Oregon Tourism Commission; Oregon Department of Revenue;Oregon Economic and Community Development Department. 5 Largest Employers, Public and Private as of November, 2000 Employer-Product/Service Number of Employees Precision Interconnect-Cables for Electic Medical Apparatus 800 US West Dex-Publishes White and Yellow Pages 385 FLIR-Thermal Imaging Systems 333 .../FMIPro?-db=Community.fp4&-Format=forms.htm&-lay=webpage&-op=eq&sort%20nam10/11/2002 .e-tJJ1J11.116 \.V111111U111L1GJ°tJ1GgU111:.GU11Vl111t,(X LU111111U111Ly LGVG1U11111G11L 1JG1JZl1L111G11L rage . 1.11 1•+ Gerber Legendary Blades—Manufacturing Knives 300 Coe Manufacturing—Plywood Machinery 250 Source: City Administration Oregon Employment Labor Market Information This link takes you to the Oregon Employment Department, Labor Market Analysis database. County information can be obtained here. http://olmis.emp.state.or.us—Click on Regional Info. Local and Regional Economic Development Organizations City of Tigard—http://www.ci.tigard.or.us/ 503-639-4171 Economic & Community Development Department Regional Development 503-229-5115 Officer—http://www.econ.state.or.us/ Source: City Administration,local chamber of commerce,Oregon Economic and Community Development Department Education/Workforce Public and Private Schools K-12 Public School District: Tigard-Tualatin School District 23J District Certified Staff: 1997-98-655 Source: Oregon Department of Education, 1998 enrollment, 1997 certified staff Tigard Elementary, Deer Creek Elementary, Durham Elementary, Public Schools in the Community Templeton Elementary, Woodward Elementary schools (K-5) 1998-99 enrollment: 5251 Elementary, Metzger Elementary; Middle schools (6-8) 1998-99 enrollment: 2602 Fowler Middle, Twality Middle; High schools (9-12) 1998-99 enrollment: 3430 21st Century Academy, Tigard High Other Schools in the School District (Private, Parochial) 9 Private schools. Please see Department of Education's directory at http://www.ode.state.or.us/pubs/directory/ Source: Oregon Department of Education 1998-99 enrollment; 1998-99 Private and Parochial Schools reporting.For a copy of the Public School Directory visit http://www.ode.state.or.us/pubs/directory' Oregon Community Colleges and Public Universities .../FMPro?-db=Community.fp4&-Format=forms.htm&-lay=webpage&-op=eq&sort%20nam 10/11/2002 Assisting communities--Oregon tconomic az community lieveiopment vepartment rage o or 14 toria Forest Grog Portdan Pen on Bay City 1]at os Tillamoo � ' '�. jes 1 c L L.a rande Public Newbe . innvi ke University+ AC Albany I ` ` 'p Private Newp Corvallis ---s. University+ ntarso IC iC Eugene IC a ( Community College It C..sBay $ Rcsbr ;x ;: • G nts ,P !I I x .,MedforaCC MiClamath Falls _ Jas Iand-° For a list of public and private educational institutions in Oregon visit http://www.oregon.gov/index.cfm?CurrPID=505. Workforce Oregon Economic and Community Development Department Workforce Advocate 503-986-0207, or visit http://www.econ.state.or.usBlworkforce.htm. Locate local workforce assistance at http://www.w orkforce.state.or.us/o cnone stopB ro chure/onestops/map.html. Financial Information Financial Institutions Commercial Banks: 7 Savings and Loans: 4 Credit Unions: 0 Source: City Administration Taxes Sales Tax Oregon has no general sales tax. Property Tax Property—Who pays? Owners of real and business personal property, according to the assessed value of taxable residential, commercial, farm, industrial, utility and timber property. County assessors use permanent rates set for all taxing districts in fiscal year 1997-98, when taxes were significantly reduced with a statewide average 17 percent cut in tax levies. Certain types of .../FMPro?-db=Community.fp4&-Format=forms.htm&-lay=webpage&-op=eq&sort%20nam10/11/2002 Assisting Lommunlllcs--ureguIl ticuLluII11L: OG LO11111IUU1Ly JJCVCIUPi11Clll Li paiU1lGlit ragc i vi i•t • levies are outside this reduction. The tax rates cannot exceed$15 per$1,000 of real market value. For 1997-98, all property was valued by county assessors at 90 percent of the July 1, 1995, levels. For subsequent years, assessed values are limited to a 3 percent annual growth rate. Construction since July 1, 1995, is valued at the average rate of similar properties in the area. Business personal property requires annual filing. One–third payment is due by November 15. If fully paid by November 15, a 3 percent discount is allowed. Special exemptions, tax relief programs and deferrals are available. For more information contact the Washington County assessor's office at 503-648-8741. Tax rates are representative of the largest tax code in the city. The rates are expressed as tax liability per $1,000 of assessed property value. Washington County Average Compressed Tax Rate 1997-98 $14.29 Average Compressed Tax Rate 1998-99 $14.31 Average 1999 Housing Value $134,605.01 Ave Res Property Tax Paid on Ave House 1997-98 $1,851.87 Ave Res Property Tax Paid on Ave House 1998-99 $1,926.20 Average School rate 1998-99 $6.88 Average Non-School Rate 1998-99 $7.50 Average City Rate 1998-99 $3.10 Business Taxes Property—see above Income—Corporations doing or authorized to do business in Oregon pay excise tax. Corporations not doing or authorized to do business, but having income from an Oregon source, pay income tax. For more information contact the Oregon Department of Revenue, 955 Center St.,NE, Salem, OR 97301, 503-378-4988, http://www.dor.state.or.us. Unemployment Insurance—Employers pay this. For 1999, new employers are assigned a fixed rate of 3 percent. Tax rates for existing employers are based on employers' experience ranged from 1 percent to 5.4 percent. Taxes are paid quarterly and are due by the end of the month following the quarter. In 1999, the tax is paid on the first $23,000 of wages paid to each employee. The rate schedule in effect depends on the balance in the Trust Fund as of August 31 each year and the balance at a level adequate to pay benefits. For more information contact the Oregon Employment Department, 875 Union St.,NE, Salem, OR 97301, 503-378-3524, web http://www.emp.state.or.us. Utilities, Railroad, Weight-mile—Who pays? All railroads and investor-owned utilities operating with the state pay an annual fee. For-hire and private motor carriers operating into,within and through the state pay weight-mile taxes. Rates—limit of.25 percent of gross operating revenues of investor-owned utilities; .25 percent charged on 1999 revenues. Limit of.35 percent on gross operating revenues of railroads; .267 percent charged in 1998 revenues. Applications, plate fees and per-mile rates dependent on declared combined weight of vehicle. For more information contact the Oregon Public Utility Commission, 550 Capitol St.,NE, Suite 215, Salem, OR 97301-2551, 503-378-6611,web .../FMPro?-db=Community.fp4&-Format=forms.htm&-laywebpage&-op=eq&sort%20nam10/11/2002 tiSSISULIg, L.v►iuuuti1LLc --.J1G6v►1 l:wll L,v tinny UIv uu%.uL 1 age o vi i-t http://www.puc.state.or.us; Oregon Department of Transportation, Rail Section, 555 13th St.,NE, Salem, OR 97310-1333, 503-986-4125, web http://www.odot.state.or.us/rail/; Oregon Department of Transportation, Motor Carrier Transport Branch, 550 Capitol St.,NE, Salem, OR 97301-3871, 503– 378-6699, web http://www.odot.state.or.us/trucking;. Incentives Oregon Economic and Community Development Department: Oregon Enterprise Zone Program, business incentives/information from Business and Industry Other incentives: Miscellaneous Motor Vehicle Licensing, Driver Licensing, Fuels—Who pays? Owners and operators of motor vehicles. Oil companies importing fuels. Truckers using Oregon highways. Fees—Registration fees, driver license fees and renewals (contact the Oregon Driver & Motor Vehicle Services division 503- 945-5000, web http://www.odot.state.or.us/dmv/ Hunting and Fishing Licenses—contact Oregon Department of Fish and Wildlife, PO Box 59, Portland, OR 97207, general information 503-982-5268, licenses/tags/permits 503-872-5275, web http://www.dfw.state.or.us/. Amusement Device Tax—Paid by owners of gaming machines such as video poker and Keno. More information from the Oregon Department of Revenue,web http://www.dor.state.or.us. Emergency Communications (9-1-1) Tax—Telephone companies providing local exchange access services in Oregon Collect this tax from their customers. The tax, which is $0.75 per line per month, is reported and paid quarterly. More information from the Oregon Department of Revenue, web http://www.dor.state.or.us. Hazardous Substance Fee—Paid by possessors of nonpetroleum hazardous substance. More information from the Oregon Department of Revenue,web http://www.dor.state.or.us. Petroleum Load Fee—Paid by petroleum suppliers and importers to Oregon. More information from the Oregon Department of Revenue, web http://www.dor.state.or.us. Timber Severance Tax—Paid by timber owners on harvested timber's value. More information from the Oregon Department of Revenue, web http://www.dor.state.or.us. Forest Products Harvest Tax—Paid on timber cut from any land in Oregon. More information from the Oregon Department of Revenue, web http://www.dor.state.or.us. Dry Cleaning Tax—Paid by operators of dry cleaning facilities. More information from the Oregon Department of Revenue, web http://www.dor.state.or.us. Alcoholic Beverages—Manufacturers and/or import wholesalers of malt beverages and wines pay a privilege tax. Manufacturers, wholesalers and retailers of distilled spirits, malt beverages and wines pay license fees. Employees who serve alcoholic beverages pay for service permits. For more .../FMPro?-db=Community.fp4&-Format=forms.htm&-lay=webpage&-op=eq&sort%20nam 10/11/2002 Assisting communities--vregon r,conomic ac uurnmuniuy LcveiopuicnL ucpaiuncut rage Y ul 14 information contact the Oregon Liquor Control Commission, PO Box 22297, Portland, OR 97222, 503-872-5000 or 1-800-862-6522 (in Oregon), web http://www.olcc.state.or.us. Tobacco Products—Licensed cigarette and tobacco distributors pay a tax by use of stamps or meter impressions. More information from the Oregon Department of Revenue, web http://www.dor.state.or.us. Transit Payroll Tax–paid by employers in the Tri-Met (Portland area) and Lane Transit District (Eugene) for mass transit systems. Administered by the Department of Revenue, web http://www.dor.state.or.us. Many local governments in Oregon collect other taxes, such as hotel-motel taxes. Contact the city or county in which you are interested for more complete information about taxes in that area. Source: Oregon Department of Revenue,"A Summary of Taxes,"October 1999;County information—County Assessor's Office Community Services and Resources Public Safety/Emergency Services Fire Station(s) serving community: Tualatin Valley Fire &Rescue, 22 stations Number of paid and volunteer firefighters: 350 Rating by Insurance Services Organization (ISO): 2 Comments: 2000 data Source: Oregon State Fire Marshal,Oregon Fire Service Resource Directory 2000 Police Department: Tigard Police Department Number of paid and reserve officers: 66 Comments: Nearest Hospital and distance: Meridian Park Hospital, 5 miles in Tualatin Regional Hospital and distance: Meridian Park Hospital, 5 miles in Tualatin Emergency services to community: Ambulance Service General Clinic(s): 2 Source: City Administration Communications Resources Local Newspapers: The Tigard Times Regional Newspapers: Oregonian (Portland) .../F MPro?-db=C ommunity.fp4&-F ormat=forms.htm&-lay=webpage&-op=eq&sort%20nam 10/11/2002 E- sS 1J Llllb' 1.u11ll11U111LICS--'J1c6'U11 i:1.v11v11111. (X. ..u111111u111Ly LIOVC1vpJ1111.111 LA,paJ LI11b1LL 1 QS\+ 1 V 1-11 1`t Broadcasting within the Community Radio Stations: City receives 28 Portland-Metro area stations TV Stations: City receives 7 Portland-Metro area stations Available Cable Television: TCI Telephone Service Provider(s): US West Local Internet Service Provider(s): Number of Internet Service Providers: Data unavailable at this time. Source: City Administration Library System 1 public library Source: City Administration Planning Service/Regulatory Year of Year Year Last Periodic Regulatory System Acknowledged Revised Review Comments Comprehensive Plan 1984 1998 2007 Zoning Ordinance 1998 Building Permit 1999 System Subdivision 1998 Ordinance Strategic Plan Territory Covered by Zoning Municipality Data unavailable at this time. County Data unavailable at this time. Source: City Administration Industrial Lands Does the Community seek industrial development?Data unavailable at this time. Access Statewide industrial lands database—http://159.121.111.10/indsites Source: Economic and Community Development Department Special Districts and Associations (ports,water, sewer, etc.) Name of Special District and the Oregon Revised Statute it was created under: Casavant Drive Special Road District, ORS; Community Action Organization; Cornelius R.F.P.D.; Forest Grove R.F.P.D.; Gaston R.F.P.D.; JOB's Drainage District; L.A. Water Cooperative; Metro Area Communications Commission; Oregon Sister Cities Association; Rainbow Lane Special Road District#1; Raleigh Water District; Skyline R.F.P.D.; Southwood Park Water District; Star Satellite Improvement District; Tigard Water District; Tri-City R.F.P.D.; Tualatin Hills Park and Recreation .../F MPro?-db=C ommunity.fp4&-Format=forms.htm&-lay=webpage&-op=eq&sort%20nam 10/11/2002 /Assisting wttuh1uiiiuCS--vicgo11 nLu11uiiut;a L,uuuutuuty Lcvciupi►lciit 1JCIR111111C111 ragc 11 u1 1Y District; Tualatin Valley Fire and Rescue; Tualatin Valley Irrigation District; Tualatin Valley Water District; Unified Sewerage Agency; Wapato Improvement District; Washington County Drainage District#7; Washington County Communications; Washington County Enhanced Sheriff; Washington County Fire District#2; Washington County S.W.C.D.; Washington County Vector Control District; West Slope Water District; Wolsborn Farm Water District Special Districts Association of Oregon-727 Center St.,NE Salem, OR 97301, 503-371-8667 or 800-285-5461 http://www.sdao.com Source: City Administration Infrastructure/Transportation Water Supply Operator: City of Tigard District: City of Tigard Source: Ground Water Surface Water; Bull Run, Clackamas River, wells Supply: Capacity (MGD)-19.20; Pressure (PSI)-120.00 (max) Current Water Utilization on Meter Size (MGD): 5.00 MGD Water Costs per thousand gallons: Base rate per/thousand =$1.76 Water Costs for Total Consumption of Residential: Based on 7,000 gallons= Age of Water System: 1932 Water System Comment(s):System Development Charges based on meter size. Hook up fees based on size-contact city for rates. Other fees: $1,250 fire sprinkler system; 12%public water improvement for inspections, plan review and administration of new improvements. Compliance Issues:No Water debt repayment included as part of tax assessment? Data unavailable at this time. Date of Current Master Plan: Plans for Upgrading or Expanding: Tigard City Council approved pursuit and option to build a regional water treatment plant for drinking water on the Willamette River. Source: City Administration WastewaterTreatment System Operator: City of Tigard Age of Wastewater Collection System: 1932 District: Unified Sewage Agency System Design Capacity(MGD): 0 MGD System Utilization (MGD): 0 MGD Collection System Fees: Hook-up or Connection Fee: $2,300/EDU* Access Fee or System Development Fee: .../FMPro?-db=Community.fp4&-Format=forms.htm&-lay=vebpage&-op=eq&sort%20nam 10/11/2002 KJJ1JL111� 1.U111111U111L1cJ--■JLG6V11 DLA/11011W,LX. l.Vi11111U111Ly LIGYC1Up111c11L IJcpa.tLL11G11L r a,c i.e. vi 19. Comment(s) on Wastewater System: *plus $35 inspection. $45 commercial/$75 industrial for new construction only. System is constantly being upgraded. Compliance Issues: Date of Last Facility Plan: Plans for Upgrade/Expansion: Storm Drain: Yes Storm Water Discharge Fee: Fees or issues related to storm drains: $100 for every 2,640 sq. ft. including private roads. Source: City Administration Utilities Telecommunications Is there access to broadband infrastructure? Access Monthly Fee Other Fee Yes or No Ti Data unavailable If yes, check all that apply: DSL Data Microwave Fiberoptic Satellite unavailable Is there route diversity? Data unavailable at Cable Data this time. unavailable For Oregon Telecommunications information and resources, visit http://www.econ.state.or.us/telecom/. Natural Gas—Provider: Northwest Natural Gas Lines and Feed: Rate Structure: Average $.35–$.55 per therm Plans for Upgrade/Expansion: Electrical—Provider: Portland General Electric Lines and Feed: Rate Structure Residential: $5.50 per month, $.05091 per kwh Commercial: $8.50–$25.00 per month, first 5,000 kwh $3.79–$6.30/l wh, over 5,000 kwh $3.26–$4.13/kwh Plans for Upgrade/Expansion: Solid Waste Management: City of Tigard Permit Status: .../FMPro?-db=Community.fp4&-Format=forms.htm&-lay=webpage&-op=eq&sort%20nam 10/11/2002 AJJ1J.Ll� 111111U111LIVJ--ll1V5V11 LVV11V1111V W t+V111111U111IJ L■V VLVt1111V11L LVrlLIl 1.111V11L A U5V 1J Vl 1T Utility Expansion Plans: Utilities Source: City Administration Transportation Highways I-5 N/S route, local access Transportation Access Fee: $0 Community Air If no local service, list closest Service No Air Facility Air Passenger Service: Airport Freight Portland International Airport, Service: 14 miles in Portland Air Service Comments: Rail Service Yes Willamette-Pacific, Southern Pacific Freight Service: Yes Passenger Service: No If no local service, list closest Rail Service: Marine No Description: Closest facility is Port of Portland, approx. 14 miles Docks, Port Facilities: Plans for Upgrade/Expansion: Transportation issues which might confront development,such as non-attainment air shed, etc.: Public Transportation Comment: Tri-Met Bus Service Available in the Community: Yes Greyhound Scheduled Bus Service Available: Yes Buses Per Day: 9 Local Charter Services: No Distance to Nearest Bus Service: Trucking Service Scheduled Freight Carrier Services: Yes Overnight Express Parcel Service Available: Yes Overnight Express Mail Service Available: Yes Transportation Comments: For more information relating to transportation topics please visit the Department of Transportation web site. Airports (maps and general information) http://www.tripcheck.com/About/airport.htm; Bicycle and Pedestrian Route information http://www.tripcheck.com/About/bicycle.htm; Public Transportation, bus and rail http://www.tripcheck.com/About/busrail.htm. Source: City Administration,local chamber of commerce(proprietary information) .../F MPro?-db=C ommunity.fp4&-F ormat=forms.htm&-lay=webpage&-op=eq&sortrt%20nam 10/11/2002 eiJMNL1118 \.V 111111U111L1v J--V1.SV11 1dvJ11VlaLav vt, vV aaaaala..a aaa) ..... .../F MPro?-db=Community.fp4&-F ormat=forms.htm&-1 aywebpage&-op=eq&sort%20nam 10/11/2002 Nearby Businesses 7545 SW Hermoso Way Washington(OR) AMUSEMENT & RECREATION SERVICES NEC BEAVERTON BATTING CAGE Business Phone: (503) 641-3983 9405 SW Cascade Ave Beaverton,Or AMUSEMENT & RECREATION SERVICES NEC CHILDREN-THE SEA SWIM SCHOOL Business Phone: (503) 620-5970 10170 SW Nimbus Ave#H7 Portland,Or AMUSEMENT & RECREATION SERVICES NEC CLASSIC BILLIARDS 14411 SW Pacific Hwy Tigard,Or Business Phone: (503)443-6166 AMUSEMENT & RECREATION SERVICES NEC HIT N RUN PAINTBALLS INC Business Phone: (503) 968-9579 8900 SW Commercial St Tigard,Or AMUSEMENT & RECREATION SERVICES NEC KORYO TAEKWONDO 11945 SW Pacific Hwy Tigard,Or Business Phone: (503) 968-1491 AMUSEMENT & RECREATION SERVICES NEC MADDY'S 12085 SW Hall Blvd#130 Tigard,Or Business Phone: (503) 620-6994 AMUSEMENT & RECREATION SERVICES NEC MALIBU GRAND PRIX 9405 SW Cascade Ave Beaverton,Or Business Phone: (503) 641-8122 AMUSEMENT & RECREATION SERVICES NEC METZGER PARK HALL 8400 SW Hemlock St Tigard, Or Business Phone: (503) 846-3692 AMUSEMENT & RECREATION SERVICES NEC OBUKAN KENDO CLUB Business Phone: (503) 257-0199 10855 SW Cascade Ave#A Tigard,Or Data by infoUSA.Copyright 2001,All Rights Reserved. Prepared By: Real Estate Solutions makes no representations or warranties as to METROSCAN PLUS the accuracy or completeness of information contained in this report. Page 1 Nearby Businesses 7545 SW Hermoso Way Washington(OR) AMUSEMENT & RECREATION SERVICES NEC OREGON MARTIAL ARTS COLLEGE Business Phone: (503) 598-8055 13185 SW Pacific Hwy Tigard,Or AMUSEMENT & RECREATION SERVICES NEC TIGARD FAMILY BILLIARDS 11535 SW Pacific Hwy Portland,Or Business Phone: (503) 245-5900 AMUSEMENT & RECREATION SERVICES NEC TIGARD PARKS Business Phone: (503) 639-4171 13125 SW Hall Blvd Tigard,Or BANDS ORCHESTRAS & ACTORS DUO CON BRIO 10900 SW 76Th P1 Tigard,Or Business Phone: (503) 297-6695 BANDS ORCHESTRAS & ACTORS LIMBO JOHNNY Business Phone: (503) 639-7234 10950 SW 89Th Ave Tigard,Or BANDS ORCHESTRAS & ACTORS MOTHER GOOSE PRODUCTIONS Business Phone: (503)624-9086 12475 SW Ash Ave Tigard,Or BANDS ORCHESTRAS & ACTORS ROSE IN THE HEATHER Business Phone: (503) 684-8417 15075 SW Dawn Ct Portland,Or BOWLING CENTERS TIGARD BOWL 11660 SW Pacific Hwy Tigard,Or Business Phone: (503) 639-2001 BUSINESS ASSOCIATIONS AMERICAN CANCER SOCIETY Business Phone: (503) 684-9060 11545 SW Durham Rd#3 Tigard,Or Data by infoUSA.Copyright 2001,All Rights Reserved. Prepared By: Real Estate Solutions makes no representations or warranties as to METROSCAN PLUS the accuracy or completeness of information contained in this report. Page 2 Nearby Businesses 7545 SW Hermoso Way Washington(OR) BUSINESS ASSOCIATIONS AMERICAN PRODUCTION INVENTORY 10260 SW Greenburg Rd#400 Portland, Or Business Phone: (503) 222-7427 BUSINESS ASSOCIATIONS ASSOCIATED BUILDERS &CNTRCTRS 12256 SW Garden P1 Tigard, Or Business Phone: (503) 598-0522 BUSINESS ASSOCIATIONS ASSOCIATION FIELD SVC 9900 SW Greenburg Rd#225 Tigard,Or Business Phone: (503) 968-0808 BUSINESS ASSOCIATIONS INDEPENDENT ELECTRICAL CONTRS 12254 SW Garden P1 Tigard,Or Business Phone: (503) 598-7789 BUSINESS ASSOCIATIONS KING CITY CIVIC ASSN 15245 SW 116Th Ave Portland,Or Business Phone: (503) 639-6565 BUSINESS ASSOCIATIONS NORTHWEST FOOD PROCESSORS ASSN 6950 SW Hampton St#340 Portland,Or Business Phone: (503) 639-7676 BUSINESS ASSOCIATIONS OREGON FUNERAL DIRECTORS ASSN 12725 SW 66Th Ave#105 Portland,Or Business Phone: (503) 639-1186 BUSINESS ASSOCIATIONS OREGON HEALTH CARE ASSN Business Phone: (503) 620-9300 15895 SW 72Nd Ave#250 Portland, Or BUSINESS ASSOCIATIONS OREGON HEALTH INFORMATION MGMT 10260 SW Greenburg Rd#400 Portland,Or Business Phone: (503) 293-8487 Data by infoUSA.Copyright 2001,All Rights Reserved. Prepared By: Real Estate Solutions makes no representations or warranties as to METROSCAN PLUS the accuracy or completeness of information contained in this report. Page 3 Nearby Businesses 7545 SW Hermoso Way Washington(OR) BUSINESS ASSOCIATIONS OREGON PETROLEUM MARKETERS 7070 SW Fir Loop#150 Tigard,Or Business Phone: (503) 670-1777 BUSINESS ASSOCIATIONS OREGON SELF-INSURERS ASSOC 7140 SW Fir Loop#130 Tigard,Or Business Phone: (503) 598-0952 BUSINESS ASSOCIATIONS SUMMERFIELD CIVIC ASSN 10650 SW Summerfield Dr Tigard,Or Business Phone: (503) 620-0131 BUSINESS ASSOCIATIONS TIGARD CHAMBER OF COMMERCE 12345 SW Main St Tigard,Or Business Phone: (503)639-1656 BUSINESS ASSOCIATIONS WEST COAST LUMBER INSPECTION Business Phone: (503) 639-0651 6980 SW Vams St Tigard,Or BUSINESS ASSOCIATIONS WESTERN PENSION&BENEFITS Business Phone: (503)684-8469 7140 SW Fir Loop#130 Portland,Or CANDY NUT & CONFECTIONERY STORES KERNEL POPS POPCORN-PORTLAND Business Phone: (503)620-9719 8900 SW Burnham St Tigard,Or CANDY NUT & CONFECTIONERY STORES SEE'S CANDIES 9536 SW Washington Square Rd Portland,Or Business Phone: (503) 639-0301 CANDY NUT & CONFECTIONERY STORES SWEET FACTORY Business Phone: (503) 620-0780 9710 SW Washington Square Rd Tigard,Or Data by infoUSA.Copyright 2001,All Rights Reserved. Prepared By: Real Estate Solutions makes no representations or warranties as to METROSCAN PLUS the accuracy or completeness of information contained in this report. Page 4 Nearby Businesses 7545 SW Hermoso Way Washington (OR) CHILD DAY CARE SERVICES CHILDREN'S VILLAGE DAY SCHOOL 10400 SW Park St Tigard, Or Business Phone: (503) 620-4010 CHILD DAY CARE SERVICES KID CONNECTION DURHAM 8048 SW Schaeffer Ln Tigard,Or Business Phone: (503)684-9275 CHILD DAY CARE SERVICES KIDS CAMPUS 12975 SW Grant Ave Tigard,Or Business Phone: (503) 639-4990 CHILD DAY CARE SERVICES KIDS KLUBHOUSE INC 9225 SW Hall Blvd#B Tigard,Or Business Phone: (503) 639-4456 CHILD DAY CARE SERVICES KINDER CARE LEARNING CTR Business Phone: (503) 639-8530 11533 SW Hall Blvd Tigard,Or CHILD DAY CARE SERVICES LEARNING TREE DAY SCHOOL 10360 SW 87Th Ave Tigard,Or Business Phone: (503) 977-0619 CHILD DAY CARE SERVICES MEDALLION SCHOOL PARTNERSHIP Business Phone: (503)639-9225 9500 SW Murdock St Tigard,Or CHILD DAY CARE SERVICES MONTESSORI SCHOOLS-NORTHWEST 11511 SW Bull Mountain Rd Tigard, Or Business Phone: (503)620-8135 , CHILD DAY CARE SERVICES TIGARD LEARNING CTR 14361 SW Pacific Hwy Tigard,Or Business Phone: (503) 603-0593 Data by infoUSA.Copyright 2001,All Rights Reserved. Prepared By: Real Estate Solutions makes no representations or warranties as to METROSCAN PLUS the accuracy or completeness of information contained in this report. Page 5 Nearby Businesses 7545 SW Hermoso Way Washington(OR) CHILD DAY CARE SERVICES TLT DAY SCHOOL 13855 SW Pacific Hwy Tigard,Or Business Phone: (503) 639-1289 CHILD DAY CARE SERVICES TUALATIN VALLEY PRESCHOOL INC Business Phone: (503) 620-2272 10445 SW Canterbury Ln Tigard,Or CIVIC SOCIAL & FRATERNAL ASSOCIATIONS AMERICAN LEGION Business Phone: (503) 624-2332 8635 SW Scoffins St Tigard,Or CIVIC SOCIAL & FRATERNAL ASSOCIATIONS CAREER EDUCATION CORP Business Phone: (503) 620-1887 7150 SW Hampton St Tigard,Or CIVIC SOCIAL & FRATERNAL ASSOCIATIONS MASONIC LODGE Business Phone: (503) 620-3838 13680 SW Pacific Hwy Tigard,Or CIVIC SOCIAL & FRATERNAL ASSOCIATIONS OEA OREGON EDUCATION ASSN 6900 SW Atlanta St Portland,Or Business Phone: (503) 684-3300 COLLEGES & UNIVERSITIES UNIVERSITY OF PHOENIX INC 13221 SW 68Th Pkwy#500 Tigard,Or Business Phone: (503) 670-0590 CREDIT UNIONS-FEDERALLY CHARTERED FARMERS INSURANCE Business Phone: (503)443-6200 13333 SW 68Th Pkwy Tigard,Or CREDIT UNIONS-FEDERALLY CHARTERED FIRST TECHNOLOGY CREDIT UNION Business Phone: (503) 641-4958 8700 SW Nimbus Ave#A Beaverton,Or Data by infoUSA.Copyright 2001,All Rights Reserved. Prepared By: Real Estate Solutions makes no representations or warranties as to METROSCAN PLUS the accuracy or completeness of information contained in this report. Page 6 Nearby Businesses 7545 SW Hermoso Way Washington(OR) CREDIT UNIONS-FEDERALLY CHARTERED NORTHWEST CORPORTATE CU 9720 SW Nimbus Ave Beaverton,Or Business Phone: (503) 350-2200 CREDIT UNIONS-FEDERALLY CHARTERED OREGON CREDIT UNION LEAGUE Business Phone: (503) 641-8420 9730 SW Nimbus Ave Beaverton,Or CREDIT UNIONS-FEDERALLY CHARTERED UFCW NORTHWEST FEDERAL CU 7095 SW Sandburg St Tigard,Or Business Phone: (503) 684-9297 DAIRY PRODUCTS STORES COOL TEMPTATIONS 9633 SW Washington Square Rd Tigard,Or Business Phone: (503) 968-2926 DAIRY PRODUCTS STORES TCBY 11681 SW Pacific Hwy Tigard,Or Business Phone: (503) 684-0551 DANCE STUDIOS SCHOOLS & HALLS DANCE CONNECTION 11945 SW Pacific Hwy#115 Tigard,Or Business Phone: (503) 241-0460 DANCE STUDIOS SCHOOLS & HALLS FRED ASTAIRE DANCE STUDIO 11513 SW Pacific Hwy Portland,Or Business Phone: (503) 246-6922 DANCE STUDIOS SCHOOLS & HALLS LIMPRESSIONS DANCE CLUB 14363 SW Pacific Hwy Tigard,Or Business Phone: (503) 598-0311 DANCE STUDIOS SCHOOLS & HALLS MAHER IRISH DANCE ACADEMY 14865 SW 74Th Ave Tigard, Or Business Phone: (503) 670-7451 Data by infoUSA.Copyright 2001,All Rights Reserved. Prepared By: Real Estate Solutions makes no representations or warranties as to METROSCAN PLUS the accuracy or completeness of information contained in this report. Page 7 Nearby Businesses 7545 SW Hermoso Way Washington(OR) DANCE STUDIOS SCHOOLS & HALLS TIGARD DANCE CTR Business Phone: (503) 684-7034 11945 SW Pacific Hwy#115 Tigard, Or ti DANCE STUDIOS SCHOOLS & HALLS WESTSIDE DANCE&GYMNASTICS Business Phone: (503) 639-5388 11632 SW Pacific Hwy Tigard,Or DATA PROCESSING SCHOOLS CEI Business Phone: (503)641-8292 8285 SW Nimbus Ave Beaverton,Or DATA PROCESSING SCHOOLS KINETIC COMPUTER SOLUTIONS INC Business Phone: (503) 520-0555 9225 SW Nimbus Ave Beaverton,Or DATA PROCESSING SCHOOLS NEW HORIZONS COMPUTER LEARNING Business Phone: (503)641-8292 8285 SW Nimbus Ave#112 Beaverton,Or DATA PROCESSING SCHOOLS PAGE GROUP 7100 SW Hampton St#121B Tigard,Or Business Phone: (503)245-4493 DATA PROCESSING SCHOOLS QUES TECH INC Business Phone: (503)639-4474 8962 SW Commercial St Tigard,Or DATA PROCESSING SCHOOLS QUICKTRAIN Business Phone: (503) 977-0853 11531 SW Pacific Hwy Tigard,Or DATA PROCESSING SCHOOLS SECOND SITE BUSINESS SOLUTIONS Business Phone: (503)246-7776 9035 SW 66Th Ave Portland,Or Data by infoUSA.Copyright 2001,All Rights Reserved. Prepared By: Real Estate Solutions makes no representations or warranties as to METROSCAN PLUS the accuracy or completeness of information contained in this report. Page 8 Nearby Businesses 7545 SW Hermoso Way Washington(OR) DENTAL LABORATORIES CERAMICS WEST DENTAL LAB 11570 SW 69Th Ave Tigard,Or Business Phone: (503)620-9245 1 DENTAL LABORATORIES KUHN DENTAL LABORATORY 8320 SW Oak St Tigard, Or Business Phone: (503)244-1993 DENTAL LABORATORIES SMILE DESIGN CTR 11995 SW Pacific Hwy Tigard,Or Business Phone:(503)639-3290 DENTAL LABORATORIES VAIL DENTAL LAB Business Phone: (503) 318-5038 11945 SW Pacific Hwy#303 Tigard,Or DEPARTMENT STORES BI-MART 13500 SW Pacific Hwy#70 Tigard,Or Business Phone: (503)624-0103 DEPARTMENT STORES BURLINGTON COAT FACTORY Business Phone: (503)646-9900 9125 SW Cascade Ave Beaverton,Or DEPARTMENT STORES COSTCO WHOLESALE 7855 SW Dartmouth Rd Tigard, Or Business Phone: (503)639-8969 DEPARTMENT STORES EDDIE BAUER INC 9524 SW Washington Square Rd Tigard,Or Business Phone: (503)624-0704 DEPARTMENT STORES FRED MEYER ONE STOP SHOPPING 11565 SW Pacific Hwy Tigard,Or Business Phone: (503) 293-7067 Data by infoUSA.Copyright 2001,All Rights Reserved. Prepared By: Real Estate Solutions makes no representations or warranties as to METROSCAN PLUS the accuracy or completeness of information contained in this report. Page 9 Nearby Businesses 7545 SW Hermoso Way Washington(OR) DEPARTMENT STORES J C PENNEY CO 9500 SW Washington Square Rd Tigard,Or Business Phone: (503) 620-0750 DEPARTMENT STORES MEIER&FRANK 9300 SW Washington Square Rd Tigard,Or Business Phone: (503) 620-3311 DEPARTMENT STORES MERVYN'S Business Phone: (503) 620-8800 9400 SW Washington Square Rd Portland,Or DEPARTMENT STORES NORDSTROM 9700 SW Washington Square Rd Portland,Or Business Phone; (503) 620-0555 DEPARTMENT STORES SHARMS 99 CENT STORE 11945 SW Pacific Hwy#246 Tigard, Or Business Phone: (503) 639-4004 DEPARTMENT STORES TARGET Business Phone: (503) 624-0273 9009 SW Hall Blvd Portland,Or DRINKING PLACES DR FEELGOOD'S PUB 13500 SW Pacific Hwy Tigard,Or Business Phone: (503) 624-9722 EATING PLACES ARBY'S 11701 SW Pacific Hwy Tigard, Or Business Phone: (503) 624-9209 EATING PLACES ASABACHE MEXICAN RESTAURANT Business Phone: (503) 598-3907 13815 SW Pacific Hwy#D Tigard,Or Data by infoUSA.Copyright 2001,All Rights Reserved. Prepared By: Real Estate Solutions makes no representations or warranties as to METROSCAN PLUS the accuracy or completeness of information contained in this report. Page 10 Nearby Businesses 7545 SW Hermoso Way Washington(OR) EATING PLACES BABE'S BAR&BROILER Business Phone: (503) 684-3011 11920 SW Pacific Hwy Tigard,Or EATING PLACES BANNING'S CATERING Business Phone: (503) 244-2558 11477 SW Pacific Hwy Tigard,Or EATING PLACES BANNING'S RESTAURANT&PIE Business Phone: (503) 244-2558 11477 SW Pacific Hwy Tigard,Or EATING PLACES BASKIN-ROBBINS 11705 SW Pacific Hwy#E Tigard,Or Business Phone: (503) 620-0794 EATING PLACES BASKIN-ROBBINS Business Phone: (503) 639-1667 9461 SW Washington Square Rd Portland,Or EATING PLACES BENIHANA Business Phone: (503) 643-4016 9205 SW Cascade Ave Beaverton,Or EATING PLACES BURGER KING Business Phone: (503) 639-4853 10105 SW Nimbus Ave Tigard,Or EATING PLACES BURGER KING 11539 Business Phone: (503) 245-6807 1539 SW Pacific Hwy Tigard,Or EATING PLACES BURGER KING Business Phone: (503) 598-0566 13165 SW Pacific Hwy Tigard,Or Data by infoUSA.Copyright 2001,All Rights Reserved. Prepared By: Real Estate Solutions makes no representations or warranties as to METROSCAN PLUS the accuracy or completeness of information contained in this report. Page 11 Nearby Businesses 7545 SW Hermoso Way Washington(OR) EATING PLACES BUSTER'S TEXAS-STYLE BARBECUE 1 Business Phone: (503)452-8384 11419 SW Pacific Hwy Tigard, Or EATING PLACES CAFE ALLEGRO 12386 SW Main St Tigard,Or Business Phone:(503) 684-0130 EATING PLACES CAFE TODAY 10200 SW Greenburg Rd#100 Portland,Or Business Phone:(503) 977-9295 EATING PLACES CAPONE'S RESTAURANT 1 Business Phone:(503)620-8862 13066 SW Pacific Hwy Tigard,Or EATING PLACES CARL'S JR RESTAURANT 15520 SW Pacific Hwy Tigard,Or Business Phone: (503)684-7076 EATING PLACES CARMICHAEL'S CATERING 1 Business Phone: (503)624-0184 12740 SW Pacific Hwy Tigard, Or EATING PLACES CARMICHAEL'S PUB&GRILL 1 Business Phone: (503)624-0243 12740 SW Pacific Hwy Tigard, Or EATING PLACES CARROWS RESTAURANT 10900 SW 69Th Ave Portland, Or Business Phone: (503)246-5588 EATING PLACES CASA LUPITA 10350 SW Greenburg Rd Portland, Or Business Phone: (503)684-1505 Data by infoUSA Copyright 2001,All Rights Reserved. Prepared By: Real Estate Solutions makes no representations or warranties as to METROSCAN PLUS the accuracy or completeness of information contained in this report. Page 12 Nearby Businesses 7545 SW Hermoso Way Washington(OR) EATING PLACES CHEVYS FRESH MEX RESTAURANT 8400 SW Nimbus Ave Beaverton,Or Business Phone: (503) 626-7667 EATING PLACES CHINA 2000 RESTAURANT Business Phone: (503) 626-1889 8775 SW Cascade Ave Beaverton,Or EATING PLACES CHIX A BOB 10035 SW Nimbus Ave Beaverton,Or Business Phone: (503) 350-1800 EATING PLACES CROSSROADS RESTAURANT&BAR 9000 SW Washington Square Rd Tigard,Or Business Phone: (503) 644-4000 EATING PLACES CUCINA CUCINA ITALIAN CAFE 10205 SW Washington Square Rd Tigard,Or Business Phone: (503) 968-2000 EATING PLACES CYBER CAFE 12430 SW Main St Tigard, Or Business Phone: (503) 968-7728 1 EATING PLACES DALTON'S CATERING 8530 SW Pfaffle St Portland,Or Business Phone: (503) 639-7211 EATING PLACES DAMON'S RESTAURANT 15230 SW Sequoia Pkwy Tigard,Or Business Phone: (503) 670-7770 EATING PLACES DAVIDSON'S CASUAL DINING Business Phone: (503) 639-5111 12830 SW Pacific Hwy Tigard,Or Data by infoUSA.Copyright 2001,All Rights Reserved. Prepared By: Real Estate Solutions makes no representations or warranties as to METROSCAN PLUS the accuracy or completeness of information contained in this report. Page 13 Nearby Businesses 7545 SW Hermoso Way Washington(OR) EATING PLACES DE ANGELO'S CATERERS &ITALIAN Business Phone: (503) 620-9020 14297 SW Pacific Hwy Tigard,Or EATING PLACES DENNY'S 8787 SW Scholls Ferry Rd Portland,Or Business Phone: (503) 646-7724 EATING PLACES DENONA'S PIZZA Business Phone: (503) 246-2433 10120 SW Hall Blvd Tigard,Or EATING PLACES DOMINO'S PIZZA Business Phone: (503) 626-3030 10081 SW Nimbus Ave Beaverton,Or EATING PLACES DOMINO'S PIZZA 15989 SW 72Nd Ave Tigard,Or Business Phone: (503) 639-3300 EATING PLACES EDO JAPAN Business Phone: (503) 620-0156 9625 SW Washington Square Rd Tigard,Or EATING PLACES EL SOL DE MEXICO 2 Business Phone: (503) 624-8865 15961 SW 72Nd Ave Tigard,Or EATING PLACES ELMER'S BREAKFAST-LUNCH-DINNER 14055 SW Pacific Hwy Tigard,Or Business Phone: (503) 620-6440 EATING PLACES ESPRESSO 2 GO 10055 SW Hall Blvd Portland,Or Business Phone: (503)452-8020 Data by infoUSA.Copyright 2001,All Rights Reserved. Prepared By: Real Estate Solutions makes no representations or warranties as to METROSCAN PLUS the accuracy or completeness of information contained in this report. Page 14 Nearby Businesses 7545 SW Hermoso Way Washington(OR) EATING PLACES FIGARO'S ITALIAN KITCHEN 15917 SW Hall Blvd Tigard,Or Business Phone: (503) 670-7081 EATING PLACES FUDDRUCKERS 10100 SW Washington Square Rd Portland, Or Business Phone:(503) 620-1819 EATING PLACES FUJI JAPANESE RESTAURANT 8860 SW Hall Blvd Tigard,Or Business Phone: (503) 574-2324 EATING PLACES GAFFER'S FISH&CHIPS 11945 SW Pacific Hwy#206 Tigard, Or Business Phone: (503) 639-7025 EATING PLACES GODFATHER'S PIZZA 13405 SW Pacific Hwy Tigard,Or Business Phone: (503) 968-2700 EATING PLACES GREAT TERIYAKI 10053 SW Nimbus Ave Beaverton,Or Business Phone: (503) 641-8467 EATING PLACES GURU'S OUTDOOR CAFE 12215 SW Main St Tigard,Or Business Phone: (503) 968-1431 EATING PLACES GYROS GYROS 9585 SW Washington Square Rd Tigard, Or Business Phone: (503) 968-8033 EATING PLACES HAMPTON STREET DELI Business Phone: (503) 620-1012 7100 SW Hampton St#111 Tigard,Or Data by infoUSA.Copyright 2001,All Rights Reserved. Prepared By: Real Estate Solutions makes no representations or warranties as to METROSCAN PLUS the accuracy or completeness of information contained in this report. Page 15 Nearby Businesses 7545 SW Hermoso Way Washington(OR) EATING PLACES HI HAT RESTAURANT 11530 SW Pacific Hwy Portland,Or Business Phone:(503) 246-4055 EATING PLACES HOUSE OF TERIYAKI 11615 SW Pacific Hwy Tigard,Or Business Phone:(503)620-2125 1 EATING PLACES HOWARD'S BARBECUE 10240 SW Nimbus Ave#L10 Tigard,Or Business Phone:(503) 620-8060 L EATING PLACES J P'S YAKITORI 12260 SW Main St Tigard,Or Business Phone:(503) 639-6839 EATING PLACES JACK IN THE BOX 13090 SW Pacific Hwy Tigard,Or Business Phone: (503)624-9594 EATING PLACES JAVA JUICE 13295 SW Pacific Hwy Portland,Or Business Phone: (503) 670-9899 EATING PLACES JOHN BARLEY CORNS Sequoia Pkwy Business Phone: (503)684-2688 14610 SW Se q kwy Tigard,Or EATING PLACES KAI'S KITCHEN 10380 SW Cascade Ave Tigard,Or Business Phone: (503) 968-7793 EATING PLACES KELLY'S CAJUN GRILL 9631 SW Washington Square Rd Tigard,Or Business Phone: (503) 620-0556 Data by infoUSA.Copyright 2001,All Rights Reserved. Prepared By: Real Estate Solutions makes no representations or warranties as to METROSCAN PLUS the accuracy or completeness of information contained in this report. Page 16 Nearby Businesses 7545 SW Hermoso Way Washington(OR) EATING PLACES KFC 1 1 Business Phone: (503)246-4249 11433 SW Pacific Hwy Tigard,Or EATING PLACES KOKIYO TERIYAKI 10763 SW Greenburg Rd Tigard,Or Business Phone: (503) 639-8525 EATING PLACES LA PLAYA AZUL 11705 SW Pacific Hwy#C Tigard,Or Business Phone: (503) 620-7573 EATING PLACES LINCOLN CENTER DELI 10250 SW Greenburg Rd#101 Tigard,Or Business Phone: (503) 244-3390 EATING PLACES MACHEEZMO MOUSE RESTAURANT 9615 SW Washington Square Rd Tigard,Or Business Phone: (503) 639-2379 EATING PLACES MANILA EXPRESS RESTAURANT 12370 SW Main St Tigard,Or Business Phone: (503) 639-8375 EATING PLACES MAZATLAN RESTAURANT 1 Business Phone: (503) 620-6650 11619 SW Pacific Hwy Tigard,Or EATING PLACES MC DONALD'S 11201 SW 72Nd Ave Tigard,Or Business Phone: (503) 670-0608 EATING PLACES MC DONALD'S 12090 SW Main St Tigard, Or Business Phone: (503) 639-8585 Data by infoUSA.Copyright 2001,All Rights Reserved. Prepared By: Real Estate Solutions makes no representations or warranties as to METROSCAN PLUS the accuracy or completeness of information contained in this report. Page 17 • Nearby Businesses 7545 SW Hermoso Way Washington(OR) EATING PLACES MC DONALD'S 9483 SW Washington Square Rd Tigard,Or Business Phone: (503) 620-1168 EATING PLACES MONGOLIAN BBQ 13500 SW Pacific Hwy 462 Tigard,Or Business Phone: (503) 684-6029 EATING PLACES NEWPORT BAY RESTAURANT 10935 SW 69Th Ave Tigard,Or Business Phone: (503) 245-3474 EATING PLACES NEWPORT BAY RESTAURANT 9699 SW Washington Square Rd Tigard,Or Business Phone: (503) 620-3474 EATING PLACES OLD COUNTRY BUFFET 13500 SW Pacific Hwy#17 Tigard,Or Business Phone: (503)624-2794 EATING PLACES ORANGE JULIUS Business Phone: (503) 620-7282 9504 SW Washington Square Rd Tigard,Or EATING PLACES PACIFIC COAST RESTAURANTS INC 7165 SW Fir Loop#200 Portland,Or Business Phone: (503) 684-2803 EATING PLACES PANDA BUFFET Business Phone: (503) 639-1311 11940 SW Pacific Hwy Tigard,Or EATING PLACES PANDA EXPRESS 9641 SW Washington Square Rd Tigard,Or Business Phone: (503) 968-8768 Data by infoUSA.Copyright 2001,All Rights Reserved. Prepared By: Real Estate Solutions makes no representations or warranties as to METROSCAN PLUS the accuracy or completeness of information contained in this report. Page 18 Nearby Businesses 7545 SW Hermoso Way Washington(OR) EATING PLACES PAPA JOHN'S PIZZA 12950 SW Pacific Hwy#3B Tigard,Or Business Phone: (503) 598-8680 -. EATING PLACES PAPA MURPHY'S TAKE'N'BAKE 13185 SW Pacific Hwy#B1 Tigard,Or Business Phone: (503) 639-1015 EATING PLACES PARKSIDE DELI Business Phone: (503) 526-1732 8045 SW Nimbus Ave#12 Beaverton,Or EATING PLACES PIKNIK TO GO 8610 SW Hall Blvd Beaverton,Or Business Phone: (503)641-3671 EATING PLACES PIZZA CABOOSE 11670 SW Pacific Hwy Tigard,Or Business Phone: (503) 620-1400 EATING PLACES QUACKERS RESTAURANT&PAIR 12725 SW Pacific Hwy Tigard,Or Business Phone:(503) 639-7030 EATING PLACES RAINIER ROASTER 9627 SW Washington Square Rd Tigard, Or Business Phone: (503)684-3453 EATING PLACES RED LOBSTER RESTAURANT 10330 SW Greenburg Rd Tigard,Or Business Phone: (503)624-0499 EATING PLACES RICHARD'S PUB&DELI 11945 SW Pacific Hwy#245 Tigard,Or Business Phone: (503) 684-1188 Data by infoUSA.Copyright 2001,All Rights Reserved. Prepared By: Real Estate Solutions makes no representations or warranties as to METROSCAN PLUS the accuracy or completeness of information contained in this report. Page 19 • Nearby Businesses 7545 SW Hermoso Way Washington(OR) EATING PLACES ROSES DELI&BAKERY 9635 SW Washington Square Rd Tigard,Or Business Phone: (503) 598-9305 EATING PLACES ROUND TABLE PIZZA 12085 SW Hall Blvd#A Tigard,Or Business Phone: (503)639-1545 EATING PLACES ROYAL PANDA 10250 SW Washington Square Rd Tigard,Or Business Phone: (503) 620-7176 EATING PLACES SANCHEZ TAQUERIA Business Phone: (503)684-2838 13050 SW Pacific Hwy Tigard,Or EATING PLACES SANTA FE BURRITO CO 11636 SW Pacific Hwy Tigard,Or Business Phone: (503) 639-3563 EATING PLACES SBARRO 9637 SW Washington Square Rd Tigard,Or Business Phone: (503)624-6872 EATING PLACES SCHOLL'S DELI Business Phone: (503) 639-4461 10240 SW Nimbus Ave#13 Tigard, Or EATING PLACES SIDCO 7000 SW Hampton St#124 Tigard,Or Business Phone:(503) 968-6400 EATING PLACES SILVER PALACE Business Phone: (503)620-3536 14455 SW Pacific Hwy Tigard,Or Data by infoUSA.Copyright 2001,All Rights Reserved. Prepared By: Real Estate Solutions makes no representations or warranties as to METROSCAN PLUS the accuracy or completeness of information contained in this report. Page 20 Nearby Businesses 7545 SW Hermoso Way Washington(OR) EATING PLACES SKIPPER'S SEAFOOD'N CHOWDER 11685 SW Pacific Hwy Tigard,Or Business Phone: (503) 620-2662 EATING PLACES SPEEDY GOURMET CATERING 11920 SW Pacific Hwy Tigard,Or Business Phone: (503) 684-3011 • EATING PLACES SPORT'S PAGE Business Phone: (503) 643-2200 8590 SW Hall Blvd Beaverton, Or EATING PLACES SUBWAY SANDWICHES&SALADS Business Phone: (503) 620-1433 11634 SW Pacific Hwy Tigard,Or EATING PLACES SUBWAY SANDWICHES&SALADS 15983 SW 72Nd Ave Tigard, Or Business Phone: (503) 968-2719 EATING PLACES TACO BELL 13305 SW Pacific Hwy Tigard,Or Business Phone: (503) 639-2922 EATING PLACES TACO BELL 8715 SW Hall Blvd Beaverton, Or Business Phone: (503) 671-0639 EATING PLACES TANG'S GARDEN Business Phone: (503)244-9131 11445 SW Pacific Hwy Tigard,Or EATING PLACES TERIYAKI EXPRESS 15969 SW 72Nd Ave Tigard, Or Business Phone: (503) 598-0914 Data by infoUSA.Copyright 2001,All Rights Reserved. Prepared By: Real Estate Solutions makes no representations or warranties as to METROSCAN PLUS the accuracy or completeness of information contained in this report. Page 21 Nearby Businesses 7545 SW Hermoso Way Washington(OR) EATING PLACES TGI FRIDAY'S 10145 SW Washington Square Rd Tigard,Or Business Phone: (503) 620-0880 EATING PLACES TIGARD SUB SHOP 12501 SW Main St Tigard,Or Business Phone: (503)684-7827 EATING PLACES TRUE CONFECTIONS 10260 SW Greenburg Rd#190 Portland,Or Business Phone: (503)246-5280 EATING PLACES WAZWAN CUISINE OF INDIA 9647 SW Washington Square Rd Tigard,Or Business Phone: (503) 598-8585 EATING PLACES WENDY'S 1 Business Phone: (503) 620-1322 12785 SW Pacific Hwy Tigard,Or EATING PLACES YANS CHINESE RESTAURANT 12265 SW Main St Tigard,Or Business Phone: (503)639-3005 EATING PLACES ZUKA NICE 9473 SW Washington Square Rd Tigard, Or Business Phone: (503) 670-9643 FLORISTS A DO IT YOURSELF FLOWER SHOP 11555 SW Durham Rd#A Tigard,Or Business Phone: (503) 684-1628 FLORISTS A PORTLAND ROSE 10525 SW Hall Blvd Portland, Or Business Phone: (503) 246-7765 Data by infoUSA Copyright 2001,All Rights Reserved. Prepared By: Real Estate Solutions makes no representations or warranties as to METROSCAN PLUS the accuracy or completeness of information contained in this report. Page 22 Nearby Businesses 7545 SW Hermoso Way Washington(OR) FLORISTS A WILLIAMS FLORIST 11555 SW Durham Rd#A Tigard,Or Business Phone: (503) 684-8813 FLORISTS A WILSONVILLE FLORIST 11555 SW Durham Rd#A Tigard,Or Business Phone: (503) 684-1628 Data by infoUSA.Copyright 2001,All Rights Reserved. Prepared By: Real Estate Solutions makes no representations or warranties as to METROSCAN PLUS the accuracy or completeness of information contained in this report. Page 23 . - �''" ' - :� E 7545 SW Hermoso Way v. r, - #114it, ''' 04!'Pk 1111, 'W ' sk ii.' ` • +..F. , (41:41, ; de r • . Aerial llir I ; E-- , 4 . .- ‘• - j ' ,it *,,,, - 4 . ,t, _, 1 RECEI V At r t . ,dit - , ,. ar *k4:44111.Apit . z: . . Iii . a. ,v-fr , :,:s.iirrio..,40"...:t0Airir amps ji.ir I - CITY OF T hilt eRiNG le 111 A Mil, - t fM _ r_. ..' . - , • ' ei . .2,..i). :br L. pi r t i Taxlots.shp , ;I 4i= ._ _ [ i . _ a � "', I Ai* .11. tree- _ . Freeways t { Arterials . _ ' Yom. r _` € - / V ar ¢ � � - �� Minor Streets 4 4 _ v . Arterial.sh 4..14),f lig .it s Freeways 61 ilk' k - ...- ' A"Ii. 44 -'' h . '` F+; '�' .. - ter.; � : .;.� _ Major Streets at R r n." Wash.shp jk . Ailitti $ - FA:, -; ...- r - . • -5-2_,. 4- . ... ,_ _ - r--- - iAlli e. ___..- i .* left i e. 607 Ali; ...1 I; j, _ .' ..i..__ .f....i...4..ph,ip 4110.:ii,.1.406. _ill 1.4,.. 4:),I411101111111111111,1,---. -.-,--'* ' 4::‘411 1..41:._.-:-: .ti. _._:;. /Ka _44 V44.- --7 Ir. f.. *r P, ,,,-- --ir: -. dr - . •••■ att. i -4. i iti 4... !OPP I .. lip.-411e, --1• ."pl., ail r s 0. _ iti .✓< fa L 1- _,, t ;tow ...--4,41.,,,..ir ,r-.. .....61014. I: ., ' '1,t 'et,:Sit.__, .111_ I.Li .r. 4p,vo. ,. BEYELAND - ,. Nill a til I ik iertir'*` .. . , lip 1,_ i '_ - . . - _ _ :*"''-;r -•�" Stewart ilk-11: ''f As 711 _ i +� i -- title of oregort A f 4$11:4"11 JI * 0 I, , _,..: IR ., . , . :i.. __ 10„-c . N 1, , mpg ,„,,„,.... , L: .t.''.1;-: lit -4) . i.,,-_,..,_:_ir :1:4 ir - -, flii pt ir ...,.... , . -,.. .. ,_ _ i„ ,. vii ,r-i- iir---11: . (Ph* tn-J-- .47,.. - - Cam' f r s 0.05 0 0.05 0-1 Miles APPLICATION SUMMARY APPLICANT: Bob Davidson Minuteman Press Tigard, OR 97132 PROPERTY OWNER: Bob Davidson Minuteman Press Tigard, OR 97132 PLANNERS/ENGINEERS: Willamette Engineering and Earth Sciences P.O. Box 1139 Dallas, OR 97338 Contact: Bob Slyh (503) 623-0304 (503) 623-2434 (Fax) wees@ SUBJECT PROPERTY: 7545 S.W. Hermoso Way Tax Lot 1501 ZONING DESIGNATION: Mixed Use Employment (MUE). REQUESTED APPROVALS: Site Development Review. The proposed project is a 7,250 square foot commercial office building. A 1673 square foot residence currently occupies the site. The residence will be removed. ■Llinuteman Press Office Building-Site Development Review Table of Content Minuteman Press Site Development Review Page Proposal Description 1 II. Site and Vicinity Information 1 III. Pre-Application Meeting 2 IV. Neighborhood Meeting and Comments 2 V. Compliance with Site Development Review Approval Standards 2 VI. Compliance with Impact Study Submittal Requirements 20 VII. Conclusion 22 Appendices Appendix One — Pre-Application Meeting Notes Appendix Two — Pre-Application Meeting — Engineering Section Appendix Three — Deed and Legal Description Appendix Four — CWS Service Provider Letter Appendix Five — Neighborhood Meeting Affidavits & Notes List of Exhibits Exhibit 1 — Vicinity/Zoning Map Exhibit 2 — Existing conditions/Demolition Plan Exhibit 3 — Site Plan Exhibit 4 — Grading and Utility Plan Exhibit 5 — Landscape Plan Exhibit 6 — Existing and Proposed Restrictions or Covenants (see Appendix Three; Copies of a separate larger scale Plan Site that includes Exhibits 2 through 5 have been submitted, along with one 8,5 by 11-inch copy of the site plan. Minuteman Press Office Building—Site Development Review Proposal Description Site Development Review approval is requested to allow the construction of a commercial office, along with associated site improvements. The proposed office will be added to serve the proposed office use, comprise 7250 square feet on three levels. The site will be modified by the addition of a new office building, parking and a half-street improvement along SW Hermoso Road. II. Site and Vicinity Information Location — The site is located on the west side of SW Hermoso Road (7545 SW Hermoso Road), Tax Lot 1501. Existing Use — The site is zoned Mixed Use Employment. The site currently contains a single-family residence of approximately 1,959 square feet. A driveway that is located toward the north side of the property provides access to SW Hermoso Road. Topography— The existing ground slopes from SW Hermoso Road to the back of the property. The average ground slope is 13 percent. Neighboring Land Uses — The site is bordered to the west by a vacant lot in the mixed use employment district (MUE) use; to the north by a vacant lot in the general commercial district (CG); and to the east and south by single-family residences in the mixed use employment district (MUE). Transportation and Nearby Transit Service — The site is served by public bus service approximately 2 1/2 blocks away at the intersection of SW 72nd Avenue and SW Hampton. Utilities — The existing single-family residence is served by and onsite septic tank and drainfield. Storm drainage is conveyed to the west through overland flow. The existing structure is served by existing residential electrical, telephone, and gas service. III. Pre-Application Meeting In preparation for making this application, the applicant's representatives met with the City of Tigard staff in a pre-application conference cn November 15, 2002. The necessary applications and procedures were outlined by City staff in this meeting, along with a discussion of the potential key issues related to this review. The pre-application conference noted from the meeting are included as Appendix One and Two. Minuteman Press Office Building-Site Development Review IV. Neighborhood Meeting and Comments Consistent with the neighborhood meeting requirements of the City of Tigard, the applicant held a neighborhood meeting on June 12, 2003 to discuss the proposed commercial office with interested neighbors. The meeting was held at Landmark Ford Conference Room, 12000 SW 66th Avenue. Appendix Five includes minutes of the meeting. Also included in Appendix Five is a copy of the notice of the meeting which was sent to owners of properties within 500 feet of the site, along with a mailing list and affidavit of mailing. Written comments received from neighbors or others interested in the project are also included. V. Compliance with Site Development Review Approval Standards Site Development Review— Chapter 18.360 Section 18.360.020.A.5 says that the site development review requirements are applicable to any proposed development which has a permitted use. Section 18.3600.090.A provides the following approval criteria: 1. Compliance with all of the applicable requirements of this Title including Chapter 18.810, Street and Utility Standards; Response: This report addresses applicable requirements of Title 18, Chapter 18.810. 2. Relationship to the natural and physical environment: (a) Buildings shall be: 1. Located to preserve existing trees, topography and natural Drainage where possible based upon existing site conditions; 2. Located in areas not subject to ground slumping or sliding; 3. Located to provide adequate distance between adjoining buildings for adequate light, air circulation, and fire-fighting; and 4. Oriented with consideration for sun and wind. The proposed office with be oriented so that the front entrance faces the street. (b) trees shall be preserved to the extent possible. Replacement trees is subject to the requirements of Chapter 18.790, Tree Minuteman Press Office Building—Site Development Review Removal. 3. Exterior elevations: (a) along the vertical face of single-family attached and multiple- family structures, offsets shall occur at a minimum of every 30 feet... Response: The proposal is for a commercial office use. This section relates to residential development only and, therefore, is not applicable. 4. Buffering, screening and compatibility between adjoining uses: (a) Buffering shall be provided between different types of land uses, for example, between single-family and multiple-family residential, and residential and commercial uses, and the following factors shall be considered in determining the adequacy of the type and extent of the buffer: Response: The proposal involves a commercial office use. Compliance with the buffering and screening standards of Chapter 18.745 is considered in detail elsewhere in this report. (b) On site screening from view from adjoining properties of such Things as service areas, storage areas, parking lots, and mechanical devices on roof tops, i.e., air cooling and heating systems, shall be provided and the following factors will be considered in determining the adequacy of the type and extent of the screening: (1) What needs to be screened; (2) The direction from which it is needed; (3) How dense the screen needs to be; (4) Whether the viewer is stationary or mobile; and (5) Whether the screening needs to be year around. Response: The adequacy of the proposed parking area screening is addressed later in this report under the specific provisions of Chapter 18.745, Landscaping and Screening. No outdoor storage or roof-top mechanical equipment are proposed. 5. Privacy and noise: multi-family or group living uses: Minuteman Press Office Building-Site Development Review Structures which include residential dwelling units shall provide private outdoor areas for each ground floor unit which is screened from view by adjoining units as provided in Subsection 6.a. below: Response: The proposal is for a commercial office use. This section relates to residential development only and, therefore, is not applicable. 6. Private outdoor area: multi-family use: Private open space such as a patio or balcony shall be provided and shall be designated for the exclusive use of individual units and shall be at least 48 square feet in size with a minimum width dimension of four feet; and Response: The proposal is for a commercial office use. This section relates to residential development only and, therefore, is not applicable. 7. Shared outdoor recreation areas— multi-family use: In addition to the requirements of Subsection 5 and 6 above, usable outdoor recreation space shall be provided in residential developments for the shared or common use of all residents... Response: The proposal is for a commercial office use. This section relates to residential development only and, therefore, is not applicable. 8. Where landfill and/or development is allowed within and adjacent to the 100-year floodplain, the City shall require consideration of the dedication of sufficient open land area for green way adjoining and within the floodplain. This area shall include portions at a suitable elevation for the construction of a pedestrian/bicycle pathway within the floodplain in accordance with the adopted pedestrian/bicycle plan. Response: According to FEMA floodplain information, the site is not located within a 100-year floodplain. 9. Demarcation of public, semi-public and private spaces for crime prevention: a. The structures and site improvements shall be designed so that public areas such as streets or public gathering places, semi- Minuteman Press Office Building-Site Development Review public areas and private outdoor areas and private outdoor areas are clearly defined to establish persons having a right to be in the space, to provide for crime prevention and to establish maintenance responsibility; and b. These areas may be defined by, but not limited to the following: A deck, patio, low wall, hedge, or draping vine; A trellis or arbor; A change in elevation or grade; A change in the texture of the path material; Sign; or Landscaping. 10. Crime prevention and safety.' a. Windows shall be located so tat areas vulnerable to crime can be surveyed by the occupants: Response: The building elevations are provided with a number of Windows so as to allow surveillance of the entire site from within the Proposed building. Subsections b. and c. refer to residential improvements d. The exterior lighting levels shall be selected and the angles shall be Oriented towards areas vulnerable to crime: e. Light fixtures shall be provided in areas having heavy pedestrian or vehicular traffic and in potentially dangerous areas such as parking lots, stairs, ramps and abrupt grade changes. Fixtures shall be placed at a height so that light patterns overlap at a height of seven feet which is sufficient to illuminate a person. Response: Site lighting is proposed on the building to provide for an appropriate level of lighting for parking lot and building entry. 11. Public transit.' a. Provisions within the plan shall be included for providing for transit if the development proposal is adjacent to existing or proposed transit route: b. The requirements for transit facilities shall be based on the following: Minuteman Press Office Building-Site Development Review The location of other transit facilities in the area; and The size and type of the proposal. Response: The proposed commercial office use is served by T;i- Met bus service. There are several bus stops in the vicinity. The closest bus stop in south & east at the intersection of 72nd Avenue Hampton, approximately 3 blocks away. 12. Landscaping: a. All landscaping shall be designated in accordance wit the requirements se forth in Chapter 18.100. Response: The applicable standards of Chapter 18.100 are addressed later in this report. b. In addition to the open space and recreation area requirements of subsections 5 and 6 above, a minimum of 20 percent of the gross area including parking, loading and service areas shall be landscaped; and c. A minimum of 15 percent of the gross site area shall be Landscaped. Response: The project will provide 31.91% of the site area in Landscaping. 13. All drainage plans shall be designed in accordance with the criteria in the adopted 1981 master drainage plan; Response: Storm drainage is responded to under Chapter 18.810, Street and Utility Improvement Standards. 14. Provisions for the disabled: All facilities for the disabled shall be designed in accordance with the requirements set forth in ORS Chapter 447, and Response: One disabled person accessible parking space will be provided in the parking lot, consistent with the UBC requirements for a parking lot of the size proposed. 15. All of the provisions and regulations of the underlying zone shall Minuteman Press Office Building-Site Development Review apply unless modified by other sections of this title, e.g., Planned Developments, Chapter 18.350; or a variance or adjustment granted tinder Chapter 1 8.370. Response: The provisions of the underlying Multi-Use Employment zone are addressed later in this report, under Chapter 18.520 Commercial Zoning District. All of these standards area met. Commercial Zoning Districts — Chapter 18.520 Section 18.520.F states tat the MUE zoning district is designed to apply to majority of the land within the Tigard Triangle, a regional mixed-use employment district bounded by Pacific Highway (Hwy. 99), Highway 217 and 1-5. This zoning permits a wide range of uses including major retail goods and services, business/professional offices, civic uses and housing. The proposed building is for commercial office use, this Chapter applies. Use Table 18.520.1 notes that commercial office is a permitted use in the MUE zoning district. Response: The proposed use and site development concept is consistent with these principals with regard to integration of significant natural features (existing mature trees), establishing people-friendly spaces, and providing transition from existing low density residential areas that respects the livability of the residential areas. The provisions of the underlying Multi-Use Employment zone are net by the proposed commercial office use. Tigard Triangle Design Standards- Chapter 18.620 Section 18.620.B states tat all new developments, including remodeling and renovation projects resulting in uses other than single-family use, are expected to contribute to the character and quality of the area. Since the proposed commercial office will include the remodeling of an existing single-family residential structure, this Chapter applies. Section 18.620.030.A states that all development must meet the following site design standards: a. Building Placement on Major and Minor Arterial Response: The standards does not apply because the proposed commercial use is located on a local street. b. Building setback Minuteman Press Office Building-Site Development Review Response: The proposed building is within the required building setback from SW Hermosa Way and side and rear yards. c. Front yard setback design Response: Landscaping and hard-surfaced expansion of the pedestrian walkway will be provided between the proposed structure and SW Hermoso Way. d. Walkway connection to building entrance Response: An 8-foot wide concrete walkway connection will be provided between the existing building's entrance and SW Hermoso Way. e. Parking location and landscape design Response: Parking for the proposed building will be located behind the building. Landscaping will buffer the parking in the rear. Section 18.620.040.a states that non-residential buildings shall comply with the following design standards: 1. Ground floor windows — All street-facing elevations within the Building Setback (0 to 10 feet) along public streets shall include a minimum of 50% of the ground floor wall area with windows, display areas or doorway openings. 2. Building facades — Facades that face a public street shall extend no more than 50 feet without providing at least on of the following features: (a) variation in building materials; (b) a building offset of at least 1 foot; (c) a wall area that is entirely separated from other wall areas by a projection, such as an arcade; or (d) by another design features that reflect the building's structural system. No building façade shall extend for more than 300 feet without a pedestrian connection between or through the building. 3. Weather protection — Weather protection for pedestrians, such as awnings, canopies, and arcades, shall be provided at building entrances. Weather protection is encouraged along building frontages abutting a public sidewalk or a hard-surfaced expansion of a sidewalk, and along building frontages between a building entrance and a public street or accessway. Awnings and canopies shall not be back lit. 4. Building materials — Plain concrete block, plain concrete, corrugated metal, plywood, sheet press board or vinyl siding may not be used as Minuteman Press Office Building—Site Development Review exterior finish materials. Foundation material is not revealed for more than 2 feet. 5. Roof and roof lines — Except in the case of a building entrance feature, roofs shall be designated as an extension of the primary materials used for the building and should respect the building's' structural system and architectural style. False fronts and false roofs are not permitted. 6. Roof-mounted equipment—All roof-mounted equipment must be screened from view from adjacent public streets. Satellite dishes and other communication equipment must be setback or positioned on a roof so that exposure from adjacent public streets is minimized. Solar heating panels are exempt from this standard. Response: The proposed commercial building complies with these standards by meeting the above standards, except with ground floor windows. The street facing elevation has 31% of the ground floor wall area with windows and the main entrance. Weather protection is proposed for the East and West entries. Building materials consist of horizontal lap siding and brick. The roof respects the design of the building. No roof-mounted equipment is proposed. Section 18.620.050.a. 1 states that non-residential development within the MUE zone shall meet the sign requirements of the C-P zone, 18.780.130D. Response: The wall-mounted sign shall meet the requirements. Section 18.620.060.A states that entry portals shall be required at the primary access points in the Tigard Triangle. Response: The site location on SW Hermoso is not one of the primary access points in the Tigard Triangle. Section 18.620.070.A states that there are two applicable levels of landscaping and screening standards that are applicable to the Tigard Triangle. The locations where the landscaping or screening is required and the depth of the landscaping or screening are defined in other sub-sections of this section. 1. L-1 Low Screen — For general landscaping of landscaped and screened area within parking lots and along local collector's and local streets planting standards of Chapter 18.745 Landscaping and Screening, shall aply. 2. L-2 General Landscaping — For general landscaping of landscaped parking lots, local collectors and local streets, planting standards of Chapter 18.745 Landscaping and Screening, shall apply. Minuteman Press Office Building—Site Development Review Response: The provisions of the Tigard Triangle Design Standards are addressed later in this report, under Chapter 18.745 Landscaping and Screening. Section 18.620.080.A states that Table 18.620.1 Street Classification and Function Table: Streets, show street and pedestrian accessway standards for the Tigard Triangle. The portion of this table applicable to SW Hermoso Way is listed on the next page: TABLE 18.7620.1 STREET CLASSIFCATION AND FUNCTION TABLE: STREETS Street Policy Street Land Use/Design Right-of- Classification Function Priority Way North-South Local Service Provide access Mixed Use 60feet Streets Streets to local Commercial and Retail services along 99W Distribute local traffic Access to off-street 34 feet curb- parking to-curb Parking access street Enhanced pedestrian environment Response: SW Hermoso Way is a local service street. The Site Development Review calls for a half street improvement. The proposed commercial use will provide half-street improvements along with the site's frontage. Access Egress and Circulation — Chapter 18.705 Section 18.705.020.A. states that the provisions of this chapter shall apply to all development including the construction of new structures, the remodeling of existing structure (see section 18.360.050), and to a change of use which increases the onsite parking or loading requirements or which changes the access requirements. Since the proposed commercial office is new construction, this chapter applies. Section 18.705.030.E states that pedestrian walkways shall comply with the following standards: 1. Walkways shall extend from the ground floor entrances or from the ground floor landing or stairs, ramps, or elevators of all commercial, institutional, and industrial uses, to the streets which provide the required access and egress. Walkways shall provide convenient connections between buildings in multi-building commercial, institutional, and industrial Minuteman Press Office Building—Site Development Review complexes. Unless impractical, walkways shall be constructed between new and existing developments and neighboring developments. Response: Sidewalks will be provided between the building entrance and the proposed public sidewalk on SW Hermoso Way. 2. Within al attached housing(except two-family dwellings) and multi-family developments, each residential dwelling shall be connected by walkway to the vehicular parking area and common open space and recreation facilities; Response: The proposal is for the development of a commercial office use; therefore, this standard does not apply. 3. Wherever required walkways cross vehicle access driveways or parking lots, such crossings shall be designed and located for pedestrian safety. Required walkways shall be physically separated from motor vehicle traffic and parking by either a minimum 6-inch vertical separation (curbed) or a minimum 3-foot horizontal separation, except that pedestrian crossings of traffic aisles are permitted for distances no greater than 36 feet if appropriate landscaping, pavement markings, or contrasting pavement materials are used. Walkways shall be a minimum of four feet in width, exclusive of vehicle overhangs and obstructions such as mailboxes, benches, bicycle racks, and sign posts, and shall be in compliance with ADA standards; Response: The site plan provides an internal site sidewalk without crossing vehicle access driveways or parking lots. The sidewalk is 5-feet wide and where it is adjacent to roadways, the sidewalk is physically separated from the roadway by a 6-inch vertical curb. 4. Required walkways shall be paved with hard surfaced materials such as concrete, asphalt, stone, brick, etc. Walkways may be required to be lighted and / or signed as needed for safety purposes. Soft-surfaced public use pathways may be provided only if such pathways are provided in addition to required pathways. Response: All walkways will be surfaced with concrete. Section 18.705.030.1.1 states that vehicle access, egress and circulation for commercial and industrial use shall be less than as provided in Table 18.705.3; Minuteman Press Office Building—Site Development Review TABLE 18.705.3 VEHICULAR ACCESS/EGRESS REQUIREMENTS: COMMERCIAL AND INDUSTRIAL USES REQUIRED MINIMUM NUMBER MINIMUM ACCESS MINIMUM PARKING SPACES OF DRIVEWAYS WIDTH PAVEMENT REQUIRED 0-99 1 30' 24'curbs required 100+ 2 30' 24'curbs required or 1 50' 40'curbs required Response: The City of Tigard applies this table for all non-residential projects, even those which are not commercial or industrial projects. Seventeen parking spaces and one accessible parking space will be provided with this project. According to the table above, one 30-foot wide access with 24-foot pavement width is required for a parking lot this size. The site plan indicates that one 34- foot wide driveway with a 24-foot paved aisle is provided. Section 18.705.030.2 states that vehicular access shall be provided to commercial or industrial uses, and shall be located to within 50 feet of the primary ground floor entrances; Response: The driveway will allow someone to be dropped off within 50 feet of the primary entrance. Parking spaces will be located within 50 feet of the main entrance of the lower level. Section 18.705.030.3 says that additional requirements for truck traffic may be placed as conditions of site development review. Response: Delivery vehicles shall visit the site approximately twice a day for parcel pickup and delivery. Section 18.705.030.K.2 states that to eliminate the need to use public streets for movement between commercial or industrial properties, parking areas shall be designed to connect with parking areas on adjacent properties unless not feasible. The Director shall require access easements between properties where necessary to provide parking area connections. Response: There is a residence to the South, undeveloped land to the North, and an inaccessible office to the West. Minuteman Press Office Building—Site Development Review Environmental Performance Standards — Chapter 18.725 Section 18.725.030.A states that the purposes of noise regulation, the provision3 of Section 7.40.130 through 7.40.210 of the Tigard Municipal Code shall apply. Response: The proposed commercial office use will meet the standards regarding noise. Section 18.725.030.8 states that within a commercial zoning district there shall be no use, operation or activity which results in a stack or other point-source emission, other than an emission from space heating, or the emission of pure uncombined water(steam) which is visible from a property line. Response: The proposed commercial office use will not produce visible emissions. Section 18.725.030.C states that no vibration other than that caused by highway vehicles, trains, and aircraft is permitted in any given zoning district which is discernible without instruments at the property line of the use concerned. Response: The proposed commercial office use will not produce vibrations. Section 18.725.030.D states that the emissions of odorous gases or other matter in such quantities as to be readily detectable at any point beyond the property line of the use creating the odors is prohibited. DEQ rules for odors Response: The proposed commercial office use will not produce odors. Landscaping and Screening — Chapter 18.745 Section 18.745.020.A states that the provisions of this chapter shall apply to all development... Response: The following development standards apply to this proposal. Street Trees: Section 18.745.040.A.1. states that all development projects fronting on a public street, private street or a private driveway more than 100 feet in length approved after the adoption of this title shall be required to plant street trees in accordance with the standards in Section 18.745.040.C. Response: The subject property has frontage on SW Hermoso Way. Street trees will be provided in accordance with City of Tigard standards. Minuteman Press Office Building—Site Development Review Buffering and Screening: Section 18.745.050.A.1. states that it is the intent that these requirements shall provide for privacy and protection and reduce or eliminate the adverse impacts of visual or noise pollution at a development site, without unduly interfering with the view from neighboring properties or jeopardizing the safety of pedestrians and vehicles; Response: The proposed commercial office use will be located on a site that is zoned Multi-Use Commercial (MUC). Section 18.745.050.E.1.a. states that screening of parking and loading areas is required. The specifications for this screening are as follows: Landscaped parking areas shall include special design features which effectively screen the parking lot areas from view. These design features may include the use of landscaped berms, decorative walls and raised planters; Landscape planters may be used to define or screen the appearance of off-street parking areas from public right-of-way; Materials to be installed should achieve a balance between low lying and vertical shrubbery and trees; Trees shall be planted in landscaped islands in all parking areas, and shall be equally distributed and on the basis of one tree for each seven parking spaces in order to provide a canopy effect; and The minimum dimension of the landscape islands shall be three feet and the landscaping shall be protected from the vehicular damage by some form of wheel guard or curb. Response: The landscape plan shows that trees, shrubs and ground cover will be provided around the perimeter of the parking lot. The proposed plantings will provide the required balance between low-lying and vertical shrubbery and trees. The proposed parking lot contains eighteen parking spaces, which would require three trees spaced so as to provide a canopy. The landscape plan provides for trees within the parking perimeter. Section 18.745.050.E.4. states that any refuse container or refuse collection area which would be visible from a public street, parking lot, residential commercial area, or any public facility such as a school or park shall be screened or enclosed from view by placement of a solid wood fence, masonry wall or evergreen hedge. All refuse shall be contained within screened area. Minuteman Press Office Building—Site Development Review Response: A refuse collection area will be provided on the West side of the site. The refuse collection area will be screened. Mixed Solid Waste and Recyclable Storage- Chapter 18.755 Section 18.755.010.B. states that the mixed solid waste and source separated recyclable storage standards shall apply to new multi-unit residential buildings containing five or more units and non-residential construction that are subject to full site plan or design review; and are located within urban zones that allow, outright or by condition, for such uses. Section 18.755.010.C.5.b. states that non-residential buildings shall provide a minimum storage area of 10 square feet, plus 4 square feet/1,000 square feet gross floor area (GFA) for "office"and "other"uses. Response: The total square footage of the proposed commercial office use is approximately 7,250 square feet. A building of this size is required to be provided with storage of approximately 29 square feet. The proposed area will be 180 square feet. This fenced and landscaped trash and recycling enclosure will be constructed adjacent the parking lot. Off-Street Parking— Chapter 18.765 Section 180765.020 states that at the time of the erection of a new structure within any zoning district, off-street vehicle parking will be provided in accordance with Section 18.765.070. Section 18.765.070 provides both minimum and maximum parking space standards based upon uses and, in the case of maximums, based upon location within the city. For purposes of maximum parking, the site is located within parking-Zone B. Response: The site plan and floor plan indicate that the proposed commercial office use will total 7250 square feet of gross floor area. The maximum parking allowed is 31 parking spaces. This number does not include the required accessible space. Due to site constraints, the proposed parking is 17 spaces with one accessible space. The total number of parking spaces will be 18. Section 18.765.030.B. states that the location of off-street parking will be as follows: Off-street parking spaces for single-family and duplex dwellings and single-family attached dwellings shall be located on the same lot with the dwelling(s); or Off- street parking lots for uses not listed above shall be located not further than 200 feet from the building or use that they are required to serve, measured in a straight line from the building: Minuteman Press Office Building-Site Development Review Response: The parking area for the development is located immediately adjacent to the building on the lower level. The furthest point of the parking is within 200 feet of the building. Section 18.765.030.G. states that all parking areas shall be provided with the required number of parking spaces for disabled persons as specified by the State of Oregon Uniform Building Code and federal standards. Such parking spaces shall be sized, signed and marked as required by these regulations. Response: State standards require one accessible space for parking lots with the number of spaces proposed for the commercial office use. Section 18.765.040.J. states that parking spaces along the boundaries of a parking lot or adjacent to interior landscaped areas or sidewalks shall be provided with a steel stop at least four inches high located three feet back from the front of the parking stall. The front three feet of the parking stall may be concrete, asphalt or low lying landscape material that does not exceed the height of the steel stop. This area cannot be calculated to meet landscaping or sidewalk requirements. Response: Perimeter curbs are proposed for all parking spaces around the perimeter of the parking lot. The spaces around the perimeter of the parking lot either have been reduced in depth in order to utilize the bumper overhang landscaping provision or else wheel stops three feet back from the front of the parking stall utilized where the perimeter parking spaces are located adjacent to walkways. Section 18.765.040.N.1. states that except as modified for angled parking in Figures 18.765.1 and 18.765.2, the minimum dimensions for parking spaces area as follows: 8.5'x 18.5'for a standard space; 7.5'x 16.5'for a compact space; As required by applicable State of Oregon and federal standards for designated disabled person parking spaces; The width of each parking space includes a stripe, which separates each space. Response: All proposed parking spaces are sized according to these standards. All proposed parking spaces are standard spaces. The one accessible space is 9-feet wide with an 8-foot-wide access aisle as required by ADA regulations. Section 18.765.2 states that a commercial use must provide 2.5 bicycle parking spaces per commercial-personal service use. Minuteman Press Office Building-Site Development Review Response: The proposed commercial office use is approximately 7,250 square feet. The bicycle-parking requirement is therefore two spaces. Section 18.765.070.H states that the minimum and maximum off-street parking requirements are contained in Table 18.765.2. Response: Minimum and maximum off-street parking is addressed earlier in this section. Signs- chapter 18.780 18.780.130.C states that no signs shall be permitted in C-G or CBD zone except for the following: Freestanding signs shall have certain limitations and conditions when permitted of properties in commercial zones: One multi-faced, freestanding sign shall be permitted; A reader-board assembly; The maximum square footage of sings shall be 70 square feet per face or Total of 140 square feet for all sign faces; The sign area may be increased one square foot for each lineal foot the Sign is moved back from the property line to which the sign is adjacent; Freestanding signs located nest to the public right-of-way shall not exceed 20 feet in height. Wall signs, including illuminated reader-boards may not project more than 18 inches from the wall or extend above the wall to which they are attached. Response: No signs are proposed at this time. A permit will be obtained for any future signs to be placed on the site. Tree Removal: - Chapter 18.790 The Existing Conditions/Demolition Plan, Exhibit 2, shall serve as the tree plan required by Section 18.790.030. All trees to be removed are needed to be removed in order to construct the new building and parking lot. Seven trees will be planted as mitigation for the trees proposed to be removed. Vision Clearance Areas-Chapter 18.795 Section 18.795.020.A. states that the provisions of this chapter shall apply to all development including the construction of new structures, the remodeling of existing structures and to a change of use which increases the on-site parking or loading requirements or which changes the access requirements. ,Minuteman Press Office Building-Site Development Review Section 18.795.030.8. states that a clear vision area shall contain no vehicle, hedge, planting, fence, wall structure or temporary or permanent obstruction (except for an occasional utility pole or tree), exceeding three feet in height, measured from the tip of the curb, or wher4e no curb exists, from the street center line grade, except that trees exceeding this height may be located in this area, provided all branches below eight feet are removed. Response: The clear vision area associated with the Hermoso Way site entrance intersection will not be unobstructed by vegetation and signs. Street and Utility Improvement Standards- chapter 18.810 Chapter 18.810 provides standards related to streets, water supply, sanitary sewer, and storm drainage facilities which are necessary to serve proposed development of a site. Streets Section 18.810.030.A.3 states that streets adjacent a development shall be improved in accordance with the standard of that chapter. Section 18.810.030.A.4 states that any new street or additional street width planned as a portion of an existing street shall be dedicated and improved in accordance with that chapter. Response: The site is bordered by SW Hermoso Way. This roadway is classified as a local street on the City's Transportation Plan Map and is under City of Tigard jurisdiction. Water There is an existing 12-inch public water line located within SW Hermoso Way adjacent to the sit. A water service is already provided to the existing building on the site. No additional public water line work is necessary with the proposed development planned on the site. Sanitary Sewer and Storm Drainage The existing building is currently served by an onsite septic tank and drainfield and storm drainage is conveyed to the West. The nearest sanitary sewer main line to the subject property is an 8-inch line, which is located in SW Hermoso Way. The proposed commercial office use will be connected to a public sanitary sewer. The developer will connect the building to public sewer. The Grading and Utility Plan, as illustrated in Exhibit 4, displays a proposed storm drainage plan for the site. Minuteman Press Office Building—Site Development Review Grading and Erosion Control Clean Water Services design and construction standards regulate erosion control to reduce the amount of sediment and other pollutants reaching the public storm and surface water system resulting from development, construction, grading, excavating, clearing, and any other activity which accelerates erosion. The applicant will submit a detailed erosion control plan for City review as part of the building permit submittal. Existing Overhead Utility Lines There are existing overhead utility lines currently located on the west side of SW Hermoso Way. Section 18.810.120 of the TMC requires all overhead utility lines adjacent to a development to be placed underground or, at the election of the development is located at the north side of SW Hermoso Way, because the electrical and telephone lines are not adjacent to the development site, the developer will pay the underground in-lieu-of fee. VI. Compliance with Impact Study Submittal Requirement Decision-Making Procedures-Chapter 18.390 Impact Study General: The commercial office development proposed for this site creates negligible impact on public facilities and services because the intensity of use not significantly greater than the residential use existing on this site; the greatest impacts will be from the removal of existing mature trees. Noise Impacts: The use proposed for this site is professional offices that produce no noise that cannot be completely contained within or mitigated the existing walls. Overhead Utilities: Overhead electrical and telephone lines are currently located on the west side of SW Hermoso Way, because these lines are not adjacent to the development sit, the developer will pay the underground in-lieu-of fee. Parks System: Professionals and clients using this development are not expected to add to the use of public parks. Sanitary Sewer System: The existing building is currently served by and onsite septic tank. The nearest sanitary sewer line to the subject property is an 8-inch line, which is located in SW Hermoso Way. The proposed Minuteman Press Office Building-Site Development Review commercial office use will be connected to a public sanitary sewer. The developer will connect the building to public sewer. Staffing/Trip Generation: As office space for professionals, it is not anticipated to generate a high trip count. The majority of the traffic would be arriving at work in the morning and leaving in the afternoon. There would also be the delivery trucks (UPS, FedEx, etc.) periodically. Storm Water: The onsite impervious area is being increased. The impervious area in Hermoso Way is also being increased. The existing storm drains to the West and North. We are proposing to allow the water to drain to the North. The water will be collected in a grass-lined swale along the West property line to be treated be more meandering north. Transportation System: The commercial office use proposed for this will yield an increase in automobile trips to the site. It is anticipated that most employees will access the site by private automobile, although some minimum use of public transit or bicycle might be remotely possible. The extremely low volume of traffic expected will not have a significant impact on the area, particularly in consideration of the larger commercial developments in the neighborhood. Trees: There are approximately 11 trees on the site of various kinds. Four trees next to the building will need to be removed; two of which are fir trees with forked trunks. There is one additional tree in the parking turn area that will be removed. The removal of these trees requires mitigation, which will occur at the perimeter of the parking lot. Water System: The Tualatin Valley Water District already supplies water to the existing building. The demand on the water system will increase slightly. VII. Conclusion This application narrative demonstrates that all applicable provisions of the City of Tigard Community Development Code are satisfied by the Site Development plans for the proposed commercial office use. The applicant therefore respectfully requests approval of this application. Minuteman Press Office Building—Site Development Review Appendix One Pre-Application Meeting Notes CITY OF TIGARD PRE-APPLICATION CONFERENCE NOTES µ-�. CITY Or TTGAtib.=QOM Community Devd,pment Shaping Better Community (Pre-Application Meeting Notes are Valid for Six (6) Months) NON-RESIDENTIAL FFEFFP.MG DNIE I Of 15/0a APPLICANT: 1Iae, WY,DIGO AGENT: Phone:('^ ) &D O - {D63 Phone: ( ) PROPERTY LOCATION: ADDRESS/GENERAL LOCATION: 7.5445 S 4J 4-1Ec-rn6SO WAY TAX MAP(S)/LOT #(S): O S t0►q 13 -156% NECESSARY APPLICATIONS: 11E LeprnE.),r KEv E� PROPOSAL DESCRIPTION: (pr„,e,c.,nn ceC Q Single -��m*ly v'p idprce •"iry Q C'f ^t CJi i (lTr1c-1 COMPREHENSIVE PLAN 1 MAP DESIGNATION: M.,-Art, USC' lei tree, ZONING MAP DESIGNATION: CITIZEN INVOLVEMENT TEAM (C.I.T.)AREA: C"Asi- ZONING DISTRICT DIMENSIONAL REQUIREMENTS [Refer to Code Section 18. Sa o 1 MINIMUM LOT SIZE: — sq. ft. Average Min. lot width: SO ft. Max. building height: ft. Setbacks: Front ft. Side /:. ft. Rear (717,0 ft. Corner — ft. from street. MAXIMUM SITE COVERAGE: % Minimum landscaped or natural vegetation area: IS %. 1 • I NEIGHBORHOOD MEETING [Refer to the Neighborhood Meeting Handout] THE APPLICANT SHALL NOTIFY ALL PROPERTY OWNERS WITHIN 500 FEET, THE MEMBERS OF ANY LAND USE SUBCOMMITTEE(S), AND THE CITY OF TIGARD PLANNING DIVISION of their proposal. A minimum of two (2) weeks between the mailing date and the meeting date is required. Please review the Land Use Notification handout concerning site posting and the meeting notice. Meeting is to be held prior to submitting your application or the application will not be accepted. * NOTE: In order to also preliminarily address building code standards, a meeting with a Plans Examiner is encouraged prior to submittal of a land use application. CITY OF TIGARD Pre-Application Conference Notes Page 1 of 8 NON-Residential Application/Planning Division Section NARRATIVE (Refer to Code Chapter 18.390) The APPLICANT SHALL SUBMIT A NARRATIVE which provides findings based on the applicable approval standards. Failure to provide a narrative or adequately address criteria would be reason to consider an application incomplete and delay review of the proposal. The applicant should review the code for applicable criteria. d. IMPACT STUDY (Refer to Code Sections 18.390.040 and 18.390.0501 As a part of the APPLICATION SUBMITTAL REQUIREMENTS, applicants are required to INCLUDE IMPACT STUDY with their submittal package. The impact study shall quantify the effect of the development on public facilities and services. The study shall address, at a minimum, the transportation system, including bikeways, the drainage system, the parks system, the water system, the sewer system and the noise impacts of the development. For each public facility system and type of impact, the study shall propose improvements necessary to meet City standards, and to minimize the impact of the development on the public at large, public facilities systems, and affected private property users. In situations where the Community Development Code requires the dedication of real property interests, the applicant shall either specifically concur with the dedication requirement, or provide evidence which supports the conclusion that the real property dedication requirement is not roughly proportional to the projected impacts of the development. ACCESS (Refer to Chapters 18.705 and 18.765] Minimum number of accesses: Minimum access width: Minimum pavement width: All driveways and parking areas, except for some fleet storage parking areas, must be paved. Drive-in use queuing areas: WALKWAY REQUIREMENTS (Refer to Code Section 18.705.030] WALKWAYS SHALL EXTEND FROM THE GROUND FLOOR ENTRANCES OR FROM THE GROUND FLOOR LANDING OF STAIRS, ramps, or elevators of all commercial, institutional, and industrial uses, to the streets which provide the required access and egress. Walkways shall provide convenient connections between buildings in multi-building commercial, institutional, and industrial complexes. Unless impractical, walkways should be constructed between a new development and neighboring developments. SPECIAL SETBACKS (Refer to Code Chapter 18.7301 • STREETS: / feet from the centerline of LOWER INTENSII1 ZONES: feet, along the site's boundary. FLAG LOT: 10-FOOT SIDE YARD SETBACK. SPECIAL BUILDING HEIGHT PROVISIONS (Refer to Code Section 18.730.010.8.1 BUILDING HEIGHT EXCEPTIONS - Buildings located in a non-residential zone may be built to a height of 75 feet provideythat: • A maximum buildi g floor area to site area ratio (FAR) of 1.5 to 1 will exist; • All actual buildin setbacks will be at least half (1/2) of the building's height; and The structure will not abut a residential zoned district. -R1 BUFFERING AND SCREENING (Refer to Code Chapter 18.7451 In order TO INCREASE PRIVACY AND TO EITHER REDUCE OR ELIMINATE ADVERSE NOISE OR VISUAL IMPACTS between adjacent developments, especially between different land uses, the City requires landscaped buffer areas along certain site perimeters. Required buffer areas are described by the Code in terms of width. Buffer areas must be occupied by a mixture of deciduous and evergreen trees and shrubs and must also achieve a balance between vertical and horizontal plantings. Site obscuring screens or fences may also be required; these are often advisable even if not required by the Code. The required buffer areas may only be occupied by vegetation, fences, utilities, and walkways. Additional information on required buffer area materials and sizes may be found in the Development Code. CITY OF TIGARD Pre-Application Conference Notes Page 2 of 8 NON-Residential Application/Planning Division Section The ESTIMATED REQUIRED BUFFER WIDTHS applicable to your proposal area are: feet along north boundary. — feet along east boundary. — feet along south boundary. — feet along west boundary. IN ADDITION, SIGHT OBSCURING SCREENING IS REQUIRED ALONG: I ,F F . r I LANDSCAPING [Refer to Code Chapters 18.745,18.765 and 18.705) STREET TREES ARE REQUIRED FOR ALL DEVELOPMENTS FRONTING ON A PUBLIC OR PRIVATE STREET as well as driveways which are more than 100 feet in length. Street trees must be placed either within the public right-of-way or on private property within six (6) feet of the right-of- way boundary. Street trees must have a minimum caliper of at least two (2) inches when measured four (4) feet above grade. Street trees should be spaced 20 to 40 feet apart depending on the branching width of the proposed tree species at maturity. Further information on regulations affecting street trees may be obtained from the Planning Division. _, A MINIMUM OF ONE (1) TREE FOR EVERY SEVEN (7) PARKING SPACES MUST BE PLANTED in and around all parking areas in order to provide a vegetative canopy effect. Landscaped parking areas shall include special design features which effectively screen the parking lot areas from view. These design features may include the use of landscaped berms, decorative walls, and raised planters. I I RECYCLING [Refer to Code Chapter 18.7551 Applicant should CONTACT FRANCHISE HAULER FOR REVIEW AND APPROVAL OF SITE SERVICING COMPATIBILITY. Locating a trash/recycling enclosure within a clear vision area such as at the intersection of two (2) driveways within a parking lot is prohibited. Much of Tigard is within Pride Disposal's Service area. Lenny Hing is the contact person and can be reached at (503) 625-6177. EKPARKING [Refer to Code Section 18.765.040) / REQUIRED parking for this type of use: .S )060 1.cy 1 600 Parking SHOWN on preliminary plan(s): _ I SECONDARY USE REQUIRED parking: v/,q Parking SHOWN on preliminary plan(s): NO MORE THAN 50% OF REQUIRED SPACES MAY BE DESIGNATED AND/OR DIMENSIONED AS COMPACT SPACES. PARKING STALLS shall be dimensioned as follows: Standard parking space dimensions: 8 feet, 6 inches x 18 feet, 6 inches. Compact parking space dimensions: 7 feet, 6 inches x 16 feet, 6 inches. Note: Parking space width includes the width of a stripe that separates the parking space from an adjoining space. Note: A maximum of three (3) feet of the vehicle overhang area in front of a wheel stop or curb can be included as part of required parking space depth. This area cannot be included as landscaping for meeting the minimum percentage requirements. HANDICAPPED PARKING: —'} - All parking areas shall PROVIDE APPROPRIATELY LOCATED AND DIMENSIONED DISABLED PERSON PARKING spaces. The minimum number of disabled person parking spaces to be provided, as well as the parking stall dimensions, are mandated by the Americans with Disabilities Act (ADA). A handout is available upon request. A handicapped parking space symbol shall be painted on the parking space surface and an appropriate sign shall be posted. ➢ BICYCLE RACKS ARE REQUIRED FOR MULTI-FAMILY, COMMERCIAL AND INDUSTRIAL DEVELOPMENTS. Bicycle racks shall be located in areas protected from automobile traffic and in convenient locations. ® LOADING AREA REQUIREMENTS [Refer to Code Section 18.765.0801 Every COMMERCIAL OR INDUSTRIAL BUILDING IN EXCESS OF 10,000 SQUARE FEET shall be provided with a loading space. The space size and location shall be as approved by the City Engineer. CITY OF TIGARD Pre-Application Conference Notes Page 3 of 8 NON-Residential Application/Planning Division Section 7 BICYCLE RACKS (Refer to Code Section 18.7651 BICYCLE RACKS are required FOR MULTI-FAMILY, COMMERCIAL AND INDUSTRIAL DEVELOPMENTS. Bicycle racks shall be located in areas protected from automobile traffic and in convenient locations. [7 SENSITIVE LANDS (Refer to Code Chapter 18.7151 The Code provides REGULATIONS FOR LA DS WHICH ARE POTENTIALLY UNSUITABLE FOR DEVELOPMENT DUE TO AREAS HIN THE 100-YEAR FLOODPLAIN, NATURAL DRAINAGEWAYS, WETLAND AREAS, N SLOPES IN EXCESS OF 25 PERCENT, OR ON UNSTABLE GROUND. Staff will atte t to preliminary identify sensitive lands areas at the pre- application conference based on available information. HOWEVER, the responsibility to precisely identify sensitive land areas, and their boundaries, is the responsibility of the applicant. Areas meeting the definitions of sensitive lands must be clearly indicated on plans submitted with the development application. f 1 Chapter 18.775 also provides regulations for the use, protection, or modification of sensitive lands areas. RESIDENTIAL DEVELOPMENT IS PROHIBITED WITHIN FLOODPLAINS. I STEEP SLOPES (Refer to Code Section)18:775.080.C1 When STEEP SLOPES exist/prior to issuance of a final order, a geotechnical report must be submitted which addresses the approval standards of the Tigard Community Development Code Section 18.775.080.C. Theiteport shall be based upon field exploration and investigation and shall include specific recommendations for achieving the requirements of Section 18.775.080.C. CLEANWATER SERVICES(CWSI BUFFER STANDARDS (Refer to R a 0 96-44/USA Regulations-Chapter 31 LAND DEVELOPMENT ADJACENT TO SENSITIVE AREAS shall preserve and maintain or create a vegetated corridor for a buffer wide enough to protect the water quality functioning of the sensitive area. Design Criteria: The VEGETATED CORRIDOR WIDTH is dependent on the sensitive area. The following table identifies the required widths: TABLE 3.1 VEGETATED CORRIDOR WIDTHS SOURCE: CWS DESIGN AND CONSTRUCTION STANDARDS MANUAL/RESOLUTION & ORDER 96-44 SENSITIVE AREA DEFINITION SLOPE ADJACENT WIDTH OF VEGETATED TO SENSITIVE AREA 4 CORRIDOR PER SIDE5 • Streams with intermittent flow draining: <25% 0 10 to <50 acres 15 feet >50 to <100 acres 25 feet • Existing or created wetlands <0.5 acre 25 feet • Existing or created wetlands >0.5 acre <25% 50 feet • Rivers, streams, and springs with year-round flow • Streams with intermittent flow draining >100 acres • Natural lakes and ponds • Streams with intermittent flow draining: >25% 0 10 to <50 acres 30 feet >50 to <100 acres 50 feet • Existing or created wetlands >25% Variable from 50-200 feet. Measure • Rivers, streams, and springs with year-round flow in 25-foot increments from the starting • Streams with intermittent flow draining >100 acres point to the top of ravine (break in • Natural lakes and ponds <25%slope), add 35 feet past the top of ravine' 4Starting point for measurement = edge of the defined channel (bankful flow) for streams/rivers, delineated wetland boundary, delineated spring boundary, and/or average high water for lakes or ponds, whichever offers greatest resource protection. Intermittent springs, located a minimum of 15 feet within the river/stream or wetland vegetated corridor,shall not serve as a starting point for measurement. 5Vegetated corridor averaging or reduction is allowed only when the vegetated corridor is certified to be in a marginal or degraded condition. 6The vegetated corridor extends 35 feet from the top of the ravine and sets the outer boundary of the vegetated corridor. The 35 feet may be reduced to 15 feet,if a stamped geotechnical report confirms slope stability shall be maintained with the reduced setback from the top of ravine. CITY OF TIGARD Pre-Application Conference Notes Page 4 of 8 NON-Residential Application/Planning Division Section . 'Restrictions in the Vegetate Corridor: NO structures, development, construction activities, gardens, lawns, application of chemicals, dumping of any materials of any kind, or other activities shall be permitted which otherwise detract from the water quality protection provided by the vegetated corridor, except as provided for in the CWS Design and Construction Standards. Location of Vegetated Corridor: IN ANY RESIDENTIAL DEVELOPMENT WHICH CREATES MULTIPLE PARCELS or lots intended for separate ownership, such as a subdivision, the vegetated corridor shall be contained in a separate tract, and shall not be a part of any parcel to be used for the construction of a dwelling unit. CWS Service Provider Letter: PRIOR TO SUBMITTAL of any land use applications, the applicant must obtain a CWS Service Provider Letter which will outline the conditions necessary to comply with the R&O 96-44 sensitive area requirements. If there are no sensitive areas, CWS must still issue a letter stating a CWS Service Provider Letter is not required. ) . ) SIGNS [Refer to Code Chapter 18.7801 SIGN PERMITS MUST BE OBTAINED PRIOR TO INSTALLATION OF ANY SIGN in the City of Tigard. A "Guidelines for Sign Permits" handout is available upon request. Additional sign area or height beyond Code standards may be permitted if the sign proposal is reviewed as part of a development review application. Alternatively, a Sign Code Exception application may be filed for Director's review. L"TREE REMOVAL PLAN REQUIREMENTS (Refer to Code Section 18.790.030.C.) A TREE PLAN FOR THE PLANTING, REMOVAL AND PROTECTION OF TREES prepared by a certified arborist shall be provided for any lot, parcel or combination of lots or parcels for which a development application for a subdivision, partition, site development review, planned development, or conditional use is filed. Protection is preferred over removal where possible. THE TREE PLAN SHALL INCLUDE the following: Identification of the location, size and species of all existing trees including trees designated as significant by the City; Identification of a program to save existing trees or mitigate tree removal over 12 inches in caliper. Mitigation must follow the replacement guidelines of Section 18.790.060.D according to the following standards and shall be exclusive of trees required by other development code provisions for landscaping, streets and parking lots: Retainage of less than 25% of existing trees over 12 inches in caliper requires a mitigation program according to Section 18.150.070.D. of no net loss of trees; Retainage of from 25 to 50% of existing trees over 12 inches in caliper requires that two- thirds of the trees to be removed be mitigated according to Section 18.790.060.D.; Retainage of from 50 to 75% of existing trees over 12 inches in caliper requires that 50% of the trees to be removed be mitigated according to Section 18.790.060.D.; Retainage of 75% or greater of existing trees over 12 inches in caliper requires no mitigation; Identification of all trees which are proposed to be removed; and A protection program defining standards and methods that will be used by the applicant to protect trees during and after construction. TREES REMOVED WITHIN THE PERIOD OF ONE (1) YEAR PRIOR TO A DEVELOPMENT APPLICATION LISTED ABOVE will be inventoried as part of the tree plan above and will be replaced according to Section 18.790.060.D. 1_: " MITIGATION (Refer to Code Section 18.790.060.E.) REPLACEMENT OF A TREE shall take place according to the following guidelines: A replacement tree shall be a substantially similar species considering site characteristics. If a replacement tree of the species of the tree removed or damaged is not reasonably available, the Director may allow replacement with a different species of equivalent natural resource value. CITY OF TIGARD Pre-Application Conference Notes Page 5 of 8 NON-Residential Application/Planning Division Section If a replacement tree of the size cut is not reasonably available on the local market or would not be viable, the Director shall require replacement with more than one tree in accordance with the following formula: The number of replacement trees required shall be determined by dividing the estimated caliper size of the tree removed or damaged, by the caliper size of the largest reasonably available replacement trees. If this number of trees cannot be viably located on the subject property, the Director may require one (1) or more replacement trees to be planted on other property within the city, either public property or, with the consent of the owner, private property. The planting of a replacement tree shall take place in a manner reasonably calculated to allow growth to maturity. IN LIEU OF TREE REPLACEMENT under Subsection D of this section, a party may, with the consent of the Director, elect to compensate the City for its costs in performing such tree replacement. I 1 CLEAR VISION AREA [Refer to Code Chapter 18.7951 The City requires that CLEAR VISION AREAS BE MAINTAINED BETWEEN THREE (3) AND EIGHT (8) FEET IN HEIGHT at road/driveway, road/railroad, and road/road intersections. The size of the required clear vision area depends upon the abutting street's functional classification and any existing obstructions within the clear vision area. ADDITIONAL LOT DIMENSIONAL REQUIREMENTS ,Sefer to Code Section 18.810.0601 MINIMUM LOT FRONTAGE: 25 feet nless lot is created through the minor land partition process. Lots created as part of a partition m st have a minimum of 15 feet of frontage or have a minimum 15-foot wide access easement. The DEPTH OF ALL LOTS $ ALL NOT EXCEED 21/2 TIMES THE AVERAGE WIDTH, unless the parcel is less than 11/2 times the minimum lot size of the applicable zoning district. CODE CHAPTERS / 18.330(Conditional Use) Y 18.620(Tigard Triangle Design Standards) 18.765(Off-Street Parking/Loading Requirements) 18.340(Directors Interpretation) 18.630(Washington Square Regional Center) 18.775(Sensitive Lands Review) 18.350(Planned Development) 18.705(Access/Egress/Circulation) - 18.780(Signs) 18.360(Site Development Review) 18.710(Accessory Residential Units) _ 18.785(Temporary Use Permits) 18.370(Variances/Adjustments) 18.715(Density Computations) 18.790(Tree Removal) 18.380(Zoning Mapfrext Amendments) 18.720(Design Compatibility Standards) 18.795(Visual Clearance Areas) 18.385(Miscellaneous Permits) 18.725(Environmental Performance Standards) _ 18.798(Wireless Communication Facilities) 18.390(Decision Making Procedures/Impact Study) 18.730(Exceptions To Development Standards) ✓ 18.810(Street&Utility Improvement Standards) 18.410(Lot Line Adjustments) 18.740(Historic Overlay) 18.420(Land Partitions) 18.742(Home Occupation Permits) 18.430(Subdivisions) _AL 18.745(Landscaping&Screening Standards) 18.510(Residential Zoning Districts) 18.750(Manufactured/Mobil Home Regulations) 18.520(Commercial Zoning Districts) IL 18.755(Mixed Solid Waste/Recycling Storage) 18.530(Industrial Zoning Districts) V 18.760(Nonconforming Situations) CITY OF TIGARD Pre-Application Conference Notes Page 6 of 8 NON-Residential Application/Planning Division Section ADDITIONAL CONCERNS OR COMMENTS: -Jte Ruii�aea CSn ) STE )FVE )PrnfiNT RF■1rE(,) - �x�CCr flFCitiDn (o _g F6XS GAF, ti�P1C ion hric Infer, C3e inaFt" Crimp!eTE. * RETS,R-E5 ate,s\-.6or4•acx� - 1Jo-ricy r).)o FAat -4 WelreSs nem-CO AsrMch∎nr dr.api-,er. .r1Co� -k SI ncne • JJS6 PA; Cosi nnQ+--osleM.enYS �''�t•• ,C1'n fs l:ras-lr;nn K�E ti an� �B r��� act nP,ith 1Cors abo 4 4L+ r vt∎i novew.2rrG. -Pc ses� ;c4ARD�'Q��arc \e NEg;T, <Ar‹ ,carA.1 .kase cr p.n.ss��e • t o 064- ?max b1�►�. s � a-C q 15 Go —k 4,„ PQ t vf',o ►.�;- L ■ �;c\ SuLr 1 ?$i:,rec- C. 3 7 SEA VO0thAer- Icc 4 er- Can-4-QC4- t- €cY‘ eERG rst` Leekjz( er. PROCEDURE / / Administrative Staff Review. Public hearing before the Land Use Hearings Officer. Public hearing before the Planning Commission. Public hearing before the Planning Commission with the Commission making a recommendation on the proposal to the City Council. An additional public hearing shall be held by the City Council. APPLICATION SUBMITTAL PROCESS All APPLICATIONS MUST BE ACCEPTED BY A PLANNING DIVISION STAFF MEMBER of the Community Development Department at Tigard City Hall offices. PLEASE NOTE: Applications submitted by mail or dropped off at the counter without Planning Division acceptance may be returned. The Planning counter closes at 4:00 PM. Maps submitted with an application shall be folded IN ADVANCE to 8.5 by 11 inches. One (1), 8'/2" x 11" map of a proposed project should be submitted for attachment to the staff report or administrative decision. Application with unfolded maps shall not be accepted. The Planning Division and Engineering Department will perform a preliminary review of the application and will determine whether an application is complete within 30 days of the counter submittal. Staff will notify the applicant if additional information or additional copies of the submitted materials are required. CITY OF TIGARD Pre-Application Conference Notes Page 7 of 8 NON-Residential Application/Planning Division Section The administrative decision or public hearing will typically occur approximately 45 to 60 days after an application is accepted as being complete by the Planning Division. Applications involving difficult or protracted issues or requiring review by other jurisdictions may take additional time to review. Written recommendations from the Planning staff are issued seven (7) days prior to the public hearing. A 10-day public appeal period follows all land use decisions. An appeal on this matter would be heard by the Tigard `-lCfit i'- - C . A basic flow chart which illustrates the review process is available from the Planning Division upon request. Land use applications requiring a public hearing must have notice posted on-site by the applicant no less than 10 days prior to the public hearing. This PRE-APPLICATION CONFERENCE AND THE NOTES OF THE CONFERENCE ARE INTENDED TO INFORM the prospective applicant of the primary Community Development Code requirements applicable to the potential development of a particular site and to allow the City staff and prospective applicant to discuss the opportunities and constraints affecting development of the site. BUILDING PERMITS PLANS FOR BUILDING AND OTHER RELATED PERMITS WILL NOT BE ACCEPTED FOR REVIEW UNTIL A LAND USE APPROVAL HAS BEEN ISSUED. Final inspection approvals by the Building Division will not be granted until there is compliance with all conditions of development approval. These pre-application notes do not include comments from the Building Division. For proposed buildings or modifications to existing buildings, it is recommended to contact a Building Division Plans Examiner to determine if there are building code issues that would prevent the structure from being constructed, as proposed. Additionally, with regard to Subdivisions and Minor Land Partitions where any structure to be demolished has system development charge (SDC) credits and the underlying parcel for that structure will be eliminated when the new plat is recorded, the City's policy is to apply those system development credits to the first building permit issued in the development (UNLESS OTHERWISE DIRECTED BY THE DEVELOPER AT THE TIME IN WHICH THE DEMOLITION PERMIT IS OBTAINED). 'PLEASE NOTE: The conference and notes cannot cover all Code requirements and aspects related to site planning that should apply to the development of your site plan. Failure of the staff to provide information required by the Code shall not constitute a waiver of the applicable standards or requirements. It is recommended that a prospective applicant either obtain and read the Community Development Code or ask any questions of City staff relative to Code requirements prior to submitting an application. AN ADDITIONAL PRE-APPLICATION FEE AND CONFERENCE WILL BE REQUIRED IF AN APPLICATION PERTAINING TO THIS PRE-APPLICATION CONFERENCE IS SUBMITTED AFTER A PERIOD OF MORE THAN SIX (6) MONTHS FOLLOWING THIS CONFERENCE (unless deemed as unnecessary by the Planning Division). PREPARED BY: CITY OF TIGARD PLANNING DIVISION - STAFF PERSON HOLDING PRE-APP. MEETING PHONE: (503) 639-4171 FAX: (503) 684-7297 E-MAIL (staffs first name)@ Ci.tigard.or.us TITLE 18(CITY OF TIGARD'S COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT CODE)INTERNET ADDRESS: www.ci.tigartor.us H:Ipattylmasters\Pre-App Notes Commercial.doc Updated: 3-Oct-02 (Engineering section: preapp.eng) CITY OF TIGARD Pre-Application Conference Notes Page 8 of 8 NON-Residential Application/Planning Division Section Appendix Two Pre-Application Meeting — Engineering Section PRE-APPLICATION CONFERENCE NOTES letk ENGINEERING SECTION Q City oof Tigard,Oregon Development Shaping A Better Community PUBLIC FACILITIES Tax Mapls): 2S1 01AB Tax Lolls): 1501 Use Type: SF to Commercial The extent of necessary public improvements and dedications which shall be required of the applicant will be recommended by City staff and subject to approval by the appropriate authority. There will be no final recommendation to the decision making authority on behalf of the City staff until all concerned commenting agencies, City staff and the public have had an opportunity to review and comment on the application. The following comments are a projection of public improvement related requirements that may be required as a condition of development approval for your proposed project. Right-of-way dedication: The City of Tigard requires that land area be dedicated to the public: (1.) To increase abutting public rights-of-way to the ultimate functional street classification right-of-way width as specified by the Community Development Code; or (2.) For the creation of new streets. Approval of a development application for this site will require right-of-way dedication for: ® SW Hermoso Way to 30 feet from centerline. SW to feet ❑ SW to feet SW to feet Street improvements: • Half street improvements will be necessary along SW Hermoso Way, to include: M 18 feet of pavement from centerline to curb (Triangle local street) VI concrete curb RI storm sewers and other underground utilities XI 6-foot concrete sidewalk w/ planter strip. street trees spaced per TDC standards. M street signs, traffic control devices, streetlights and a two-year streetlight fee. CITY OF TIGARD Pre-Application Conference Notes Page 1 of 6 Engineering Department Section Other: 1 I street improvements will be necessary along SW , to include: [ J feet of pavement [ J concrete curb [ [ storm sewers and other underground utilities [ [ -foot concrete sidewalk [ [ street trees street signs, traffic control devices, streetlights and a two-year streetlight fee. Other: [ I street improvements will be necessary along SW , to include: feet of pavement concrete curb [ I storm sewers and other underground utilities -foot concrete sidewalk street trees [ I street signs, traffic control devices, streetlights and a two-year streetlight fee. Other: n street improvements will be necessary along SW , to include: [ feet of pavement I I concrete curb storm sewers and other underground utilities -foot concrete sidewalk street trees street signs, traffic control devices, streetlights and a two-year streetlight fee. Other: street improvements will be necessary along SW , to include: [ I feet of pavement concrete curb I storm sewers and other underground utilities -foot concrete sidewalk CITY OFTIGARD Pre-Application Conference Notes Page 2 of 6 Engineering Department Section street trees I street signs, traffic control devices, streetlights and a two-year streetlight fee. Other: Agreement for Future Street Improvements: In some cases, where street improvements or other necessary public improvements are not currently practical, the improvements may be deferred. In such cases, a condition of development approval may be specified which requires the property owner(s) to provide a future improvement guarantee. The City Engineer will determine the form of this guarantee. The following street improvements may be eligible for such a future improvement guarantee: (1.) (2.) Overhead Utility Lines: Section 18.810.120 of the Tigard Municipal Code (TMC) requires all overhead utility lines adjacent to a development to be placed underground or, at the election of the developer, a fee in-lieu of undergrounding can be paid. This requirement is valid even if the utility lines are on the opposite side of the street from the site. If the fee in-lieu is proposed, it is equal to $ 27.50 per lineal foot of street frontage that contains the overhead lines. There are existing overhead utility lines which run adjacent to this site along SW Hermoso Way. Prior to final inspection, the applicant shall either place these utilities underground, or pay the fee in-lieu described above. Sanitary Sewers: The nearest sanitary sewer line to this property is a(n) 8 inch line which is located in Hermoso Way. The proposed development must be connected to a public sanitary sewer. It is the developer's responsibility to connect the building to public sewer if not already. This site is located in Sanitary Sewer Reimbursement District #15. Any unpaid assessment would have to be paid prior to issuance of a building permit for the conversion. Water Supply: The Tualatin Valley Water District (Phone:(503) 642-1511) provides public water service in the area of this site. This service provider should be contacted for information regarding water supply for your proposed development. Fire Protection: Tualatin Valley Fire and Rescue District (South Division) [Contact: Eric McMullen, (503) 612-7010] provides fire protection services within the City of Tigard. The District should be contacted for CITY OF TIGARO Pre-Application Conference Notes Page 3 of 6 Engineering Department Section ltaformation regarding the 'quacy of circulation systems, th' ieed for fire hydrants, or other questions related to fire prop ..on. Storm Sewer Improvements: All proposed development within the City shall be designed such that storm water runoff is conveyed to an approved public drainage system. The applicant will be required to submit a proposed storm drainage plan for the site, and may be required to prepare a sub-basin drainage analysis to ensure that the proposed system will accommodate runoff from upstream properties when fully developed. If the applicant increases the onsite impervious area over 5,000 sf, then onsite detention is required. Storm Water Quality: The City has agreed to enforce Surface Water Management (SWM) regulations established by the Unified Sewerage Agency (USA) (Resolution and Order No. 00-7) which requires the construction of on-site water quality facilities. The facilities shall be designed to remove 65 percent of the phosphorus contained in 100 percent of the storm water runoff generated from newly created impervious surfaces. The resolution contains a provision that would allow an applicant to pay a fee in-lieu of constructing an on-site facility provided specific criteria are met. The City will use discretion in determining whether or not the fee in-lieu will be offered. If the fee is allowed, it will be based upon the amount of new impervious surfaces created; for every 2,640 square feet, or portion thereof, the fee shall be $210. Preliminary sizing calculations for any proposed water quality facility shall be submitted with the development application. It is anticipated that this project will require: X Construction of an on-site water quality facility. Payment of the fee in-lieu. An onsite water quality facility is required if the net new onsite impervious area exceeds 1,000 sf. Other Comments: All proposed sanitary sewer and storm drainage systems shall be designed such that City maintenance vehicles will have unobstructed access to critical manholes in the systems. Maintenance access roadways may be required if existing or proposed facilities are not otherwise readily accessible. A traffic impact report is required. Of particular importance is the development impact to the following intersections during the weekday PM Peak Period: 72nd/Dartmouth, and 68th/Dartmouth. TRAFFIC IMPACT FEES In 1990, Washington County adopted a county-wide Traffic Impact Fee (TIE) ordinance. The Traffic Impact Fee program collects fees from new development based on the development's projected impact upon the City's transportation system. The applicant shall be required to pay a fee based upon the number of trips which are projected to result from the proposed development. The calculation of CITY OF TIGARD Pre-Application Conference Notes Page 4 of 6 Engineering Department Section tF e TIF is based on the pros ,d use of the land, the size of the r ,ct, and a general use based fee category. The TIF shall calculated at the time of builu...g permit issuance. In limited circumstances, payment of the TIF may be allowed to be deferred until the issuance of an occupancy permit. Deferral of the payment until occupancy is permissible only when the TIF is greater than $5,000.00. Pay TIF for the change in use. PERMITS Public Facility Improvement (PFI) Permit: Any work within a public right-of-way in the City of Tigard requires a PFI permit from the Engineering Department. A PFI permit application is available at the Planning/Engineering counter in City Hall. For more extensive work such as street widening improvements, main utility line extensions or subdivision infrastructure, plans prepared by a registered professional engineer must be submitted for review and approval. The Engineering Department fee structure for this permit is considered a cost recovery system. A deposit is collected with the application, and the City will track its costs throughout the life of the permit, and will either refund any remaining portion of the deposit, or invoice the Permittee in cases where City costs exceeds the deposit amount. The Permittee will also be required to post a performance bond, or other such suitable security. Where professional engineered plans are required, the Permittee must execute a Developer/Engineer Agreement, which will obligate the design engineer to perform the primary inspection of the public improvement construction work. The PFI permit fee structure is as follows: NOTE: If an PFI Permit is required,the applicant must obtain that permit prior to release of any permits from the Building Division. Building Division Permits: The following is a brief overview of the type of permits issued by the Building Division. For a more detailed explanation of these permits, please contact the Development Services Counter at 503-639-4171, ext. 304. Site Improvement Permit (SIT). This permit is generally issued for all new commercial, industrial and multi-family projects. This permit will also be required for land partitions where lot grading and private utility work is required. This permit covers all on-site preparation, grading and utility work. Home builders will also be required to obtain a SIT permit for grading work in cases where the lot they are working on has slopes in excess of 20% and foundation excavation material is not to be hauled from the site. Building Permit (BUP). This permit covers only the construction of the building and is issued after, or concurrently with, the SIT permit. CITY OF TIGARD Pre-Application Conference Notes Page 5 of 6 Engineering Department Section Master Permit (MST its permit is issued for all single ar 'ulti-family buildings. It covers all work necessary for L Jing construction, including sub-tr ..,s (excludes grading, etc.). This permit can not be issued in a subdivision until the public improvements are substantially complete and a mylar copy of the recorded plat has been returned by the applicant to the City. For a land partition, the applicant must obtain an Engineering Permit, if required, and return a mylar copy of the recorded plat to the City prior to issuance of this permit. Other Permits. There are other special permits, such as mechanical, electrical and plumbing that may also be required. Contact the Development Services Counter for more information. GRADING PLAN REQUIREMENTS FOR SUBDIVISIONS All subdivision projects shall require a proposed grading plan prepared by the design engineer. The engineer will also be required to indicate which lots have natural slopes between 10% and 20%, as well as lots that have natural slopes in excess of 20%. This information will be necessary in determining if special grading inspections will be required when the lots develop. The design engineer will also be required to shade all structural fill areas on the construction plans. In addition, each homebuilder will be required to submit a specific site and floor plan for each lot. The site plan shall include topographical contours and indicate the elevations of the corners of the lot. The builder shall also indicate the proposed elevations at the four corners of the building. PREPARED BY: ►∎ - ' '0 14 2_ ENG nING DEPART ENT STAFF DbTE Phone: 15031639-4171 Fax: 15031624-0752 is\eng\brianr\templates\preap notes-eng dot Revised: March 21.2002 CITY OF TIGARD Pre-Application Conference Notes Page 6 of 6 Engineering Department Section PRE-APPLICATION CONFERENCE REQUEST CITY OF TIGARD 13125 SW Hall Blvd., Tigard, OR 97223(503) 639-4171 FAX: (503) 684-7297 —TV 1JC GENERAL INFORMATION cL 7�0 -/---, � ig 04.1/MS-e ./ FOR STAFF USE ONLY Applicant: ((��QQ''��77 CC����C-- r Address:/ rs S, (r�, P'fC hone:S? G AO Case No.: 1.17, k-..74, X08 City: 776 4A Zip: 1' • Receipt No.: 5 p ,�" Application Accepted By: �� Contact Person: /� Phone: /P1iE- �� Date:o Property Owner/Deed Holder(s): /V V-�� S V F/( /L HEAP/140S?) �/ DATE OFPRE-APP.:zeO— - �ST `"l r TIME OF PRE-APP.: 9 O© sf61/ Address: �] J�� Phone: PRE-APP. HELD WITH: City: n 4AD eye_ "Zip: 7 ot ,k, 3 Rev.7/1/2002 i:\curpin\masters\revised\Pre-AppRequest.doc Property Address/Location(s): 4.Z/0c REQUIRED SUBMITTAL ELEMENTS (Note: applications will not be accepted without the required submittal elements) Tax Map &Tax Lot#(s): 0 / 7 q 7 05/0/48. se I) Zoning:_ /t'1 u `t'd Pre-Application Conf. Request Form Site Size: (O 7 2 COPIES EACH OF THE FOLLOWING: Brief Description of the Proposal and PRE-APPLICATION any site-specific questions/issues that RE-APPLICATION CONFERENCE INFORMATION you would like to have staff research prior to the meeting. All of the information identified on this form are required to be submitted by the applicant and received by the Planning Division a 0 Site Plan. The site plan must show the minimum of one (1) week prior to officially scheduling a proposed lots and/or building layouts pre-application conference date/time to allow staff ample time to drawn to scale. Also, show the location prepare for the meeting. of the subject property in relation to the nearest streets; and the locations of A pre-application conference can usually be scheduled within 1-2 driveways on the subject property and weeks of the Planning Division's receipt of the request for either across the street. Tuesday or Thursday mornings. Pre-application conferences are —Proposed Uses. one (1) hour lonq and are typically held between the hours of ra hic Information. Include 9:00-11:00 AM. �5� p Contour Lines if Possible. PRE-APPLICATION CONFERENCES MUST BE SCHEDULED IN --ifthe Pre-Application Conference is for a PERSON AT THE COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT COUNTER FROM MONOPOLE project, the applicant must 8:00-4:00/MONDAY-FRIDAY. attach a copy of the letter and proof in the form of an affidavit of mailing, that IF MORE THAN 4 PEOPLE ARE EXPECTED TO ATTEND THE the collocation protocol was completed PRE-APPLICATION CONFERENCE IN YOUR GROUP, PLEASE (see Section 18.798.080 of the Tigard INFORM THE CITY IN ADVANCE SO THAT ALTERNATE ROOM Community Development Code). ARRANGEMENTS CAN BE MADE TO ACCOMMODATE THE Filing Fee $200.00 GROUP. 09/.10i0z 1111r 1u:50 rAA 5uJZru0544 uxe,uur4 L111.L lEJ VUv 8 7 O v • v too' OZ --_______ ,-z\-. i `� „ ..�• c ■l 46 T6 1E23 ► b► Re/9'1607 16 k ►500 xa o O y 1501 w • —o o » : - OK-- fir', 9 • r' !Al_ -c-4--to 2 i , - ■Li 23 * L . 100' v '$0 "' 105 in • M. •4• !S' 1� I.: k : , 1502 542 609 16 • � 1 't O p� W ► IBM' of •SO •• l‘s q,20 Z 11 4 S 301 els Z '., 9 W. tBE I/E4 AND 44.0 t 8 • re.Ti 2,00 --__ • 2701 ~` —�—� Z 702 120' 2703 24 ; . � . • 25 k. le 0 . 26 4 p t 2 7 /\ k THIS MAP IS PROVIDED AS A COURTESY OF OREGON TITLE INSURANCE COMPANY ai This map is made solely for the purpose of assisting in locating said premises,and the Company assumes • no liability for variations, if any, in dimensions, areas,and locations ascertained by actual survey. • 77 16- -.(5,f_ierj /0 Kr A rniti c. 6eY j) Pa C66q E Kts��A-6 (g ?7 ( ,e)A4L 4.74,E rc (-dm- V5 X7cut( 7c--) 4 otts-1,A .1- o co Vic . Gt2 _ 1.(rJ ' 7e) K O A . Pz. Le --/t1 1/ ' C°s7..S / ie,(NC c l L,D7W zAl 7z) cos/L-0 z_(4At CE 6‹.)/.?" (/ C/ 7 -q 17) SLe CC/ As s>�� -- s<`e 2 ErC_ Sv�v�r Ai- /M a tA 5 ) cr i 7z) 464-(OC/E �}CIs77,4(6-• d/A( XV& Lif Cis Cv( i(f C� Sl a C 77-e4E. A/ e dill d-c--) /14d �C/'f C Ai S/ Z L C CrZe /J e i 57 7 J % Rc r c. ,e. 4)Co r ,-((tf 3` LOA( •6e/I L 7714-c_,4 ms , S4A-tom. "pp/ I (--° ,)j f. • INUTEMAN PRESS® A PRE-APPLICATION , i!I± CONFERENCE REQUEST CITY OF TIGARD 13125 SW Hall Blvd., Tigard, OR 97223(503) 639-4171 FAX: (503) 684-7297 GENERAL INFORMATION L/ gOd /,4 L/l O FOR STAFF USE ONLY Applicant: CC��00JJ I U r Address:/ r5 S, (0, /�/�tCt,`fC hone: vZ,? (,Z S 3 Case No.: City: 7764/4) Zip: "7• : .: Receipt No.: Application Accepted By: Contact Person: R 44, Phone: :5 /s��C— Date: Property Owner/Deed Holder(s): fm_ (vs-- Z F/iS c� DATE OF PRE-APP.: `S` l�j 1 ti�%r: ( / TIME OF PRE APP.: Address: �Q �h Phone: PRE-APP. HELD WITH: City: 77 P _ `� L- Zip: 7 Rev.7/1/2002 is\curpin\masters\revised\Pre-AppRequest.doc Property Address/Location(s): 'T ,14ot-' REQUIRED SUBMITTAL ELEMENTS (Note: applications will not be accepted c� without the required submittal elements) Tax Map &Tax Lot#(s): /2 O / / 7 Zoning: 1 Pre-Application Conf. Request Form G Site Size: /�J J ` 60 2 COPIES EACH OF THE FOLLOWING: 0, Brief Description of the Proposal and PRE-APPLICATION any site-specific questions/issues that RE-APPLICATION CONFERENCE INFORMATION you would like to have staff research prior to the meeting. All of the information identified on this form are required to be submitted by the applicant and received by the Planning Division a Site Plan. The site plan must show the minimum of one (1) week prior to officially scheduling a proposed lots and/or building layouts pre-application conference date/time to allow staff ample time to drawn to scale. Also, show the location prepare for the meeting. of the subject property in relation to the nearest streets; and the locations of A pre-application conference can usually be scheduled within 1-2 driveways on the subject property and weeks of the Planning Division's receipt of the request for either across the street. Tuesday or Thursday mornings. Pre-application conferences are --0 The-Proposed Uses. one (1) hour long and are typically held between the hours of Topbgraphic Information. Include 9:00-11:00 AM. Contour Lines if Possible. PRE-APPLICATION CONFERENCES MUST BE SCHEDULED IN =LI If the-Pre-Application Conference is for a PERSON AT THE COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT COUNTER FROM MONOPOLE project, the applicant must 8:00-4:00/MONDAY-FRIDAY. attach a copy of the letter and proof in the form of an affidavit of mailing, that IF MORE THAN 4 PEOPLE ARE EXPECTED TO ATTEND THE the collocation protocol was completed PRE-APPLICATION CONFERENCE IN YOUR GROUP, PLEASE (see Section 18.798.080 of the Tigard INFORM THE CITY IN ADVANCE SO THAT ALTERNATE ROOM Community Development Code). ARRANGEMENTS CAN BE MADE TO ACCOMMODATE THE 1,21 Filing Fee $200.00 GROUP. 09/10/OZ TUC 1U:58 CAA OUJZLU0a44 unrhuty 111br VVO • 6 7 O c; it • v.v e loot O , 1 ile 16 ' Reis, , , 16 • o 1501 _ " M = -.1), 2r a _r EF 4 1 23 h Vii 100' le me ha 105 • N. •t• !t' it 4-46 1609 : % d 1502 • 16 i I • I W 2 2 o • r C • •\ �� 3431 Vii 'ell • II T --. W. BEVE1 ,v , 4s..= 8 ..Z '°'t� ' 2 700 'zo' _-___, b. 2701 27Q2 to'` it0' 2703 24 : . 0, " 25 r ap n 26 C, •ea 27 / a f THIS MAP IS PROVIDED AS A COURTESY OF OREGON TITLE INSURANCE COMPANY This map is made solely for the purpose of assisting in locating said premises,and the Company assumes --- no liability for variations, if any, in dimensions, areas, and locations ascertained by actual survey, 09/10/02 TUE 10:59 FAX 5032208844 OREGON TITLE 41002 ORi SON TITLE INSURANCE COMPAIN_ 1515 SWPifth Ave. Suite 840 Portland,OR 97201 Phone(503)220-8352 Fax(503)228-8844 PROPERTY PROFILE Washington(OR) OWNERSHIP INFORMATION IMPROVEMENTS Ref Parcel # : 2S 101AB 01501 Bedrooms : 4 Parcel Number : R0457197 R: 01W T: 02S S: 01 Q: NE Bathrooms : 3.00 Owner : Joens John D Marjorie A Heat Method : Forced CoOwner : Pmb 162 Pool Site Address 7545 SW Hermosa Way Tigard 97223 Appliances . Mail Address : 11575 SW Pacific Hwy Tigard Or 97223 Dishwasher . Telephone : Owner: Tenant: Hood Fan : Deck : Yes Garage Type : Community Garage SF : 475 Lot Acres . Lot SqFt BsmFin SF SALES AND LOAN INFORMATION Bs ' i Bsm Unf nSF . Transferred Loan Amount BsmLowSF : 1,219 Document : 7070490 Lender Bldg SqFt : 2,491 Sale Price Loan Type Is'tFIrSyFt 1,272 Deed Type Interest Rate UpperFlSF . %Owned Vesting Type . Porch SqFt Attic SqFt Deck SqFt : 160 Year Built ; 1959 ASSESSMENT AND TAX INFORMATION EffYearBlt : 1959 Floor Cover : Carpet Mkt Land : $87,890 Exempt Amount : Foundation : Concrete Fig Mkt Structure : $92,740 Exempt Type Mkt Other %Improved : 51 Roof Mad Mkt Total : $180,630 Levy Code : 02381 Roof : Comp Shingle : Drywall 01-02 Taxes : $2,199.29 IntertorMatl Paving Matt : Asphalt School Dist Const Type : Wd Stud1Shtg Assessed Total : $138,550 j Est Finish : Horizontal Wd PROPERTY DESCRIPTION Map Grid : 655 G4 Class Code : RI5 Census : Tract: 307.00 Block : 1 Improvement Type : Mill Rate : 15.8736 Zoning Subdivision/Plat : Hermosa Park Neighborhood Cd DMTG Land Use : 1012 Res,Jmproved Legal HERMOSO PARK,LOT 21 The Information Provided Is Deemed Reliable, But Is Not Guaranteed. 14 '?=, MINUTEMHN NRE55 Da.) oCU r1G.CJc • May 22, 2002 CMf OF PGARD OREGON Robert C. Davidson 14285 SW Pacific Highway Tigard, OR 97224 Dear Mr. Davidson: _ _ ._. - I appreciate your May- 22, 2002 !et-ter-describing the-services typically provided by your business, the Minuteman Press. Land use definitions do not always keep up with technological advances in machinery and services. Based on the description you have provided, I would agree that your business is a commercial service as opposed to industrial zone classification. Your business provides sales and services, more a business support service. As a result, the business is permitted in the C-N, C-C, C-G, CBD and MUC zones and is restricted in the MUE, C-P and MUR zones. In the C-P zone, the restriction is the limit of 10% of the total square footage of an office complex. In the MUC and MUE zones, the restriction is a maximum of 60,000 gross leasable area. In the MUR zone, the restriction is a maximum of 7,500 square feet and no more than 50% of the total floor area of a mixed-use development. Since you have mentioned the Tigard Triangle, the appropriate zones are C-G and MUE. When you have a particular site in mind, please contact Brad Kilby, Matt Scheidegger or Morgan Tracy to get more information on the land use approval process. 3 Sincere, 1T 4/64 Richard H. Bewersdorff Planning Manager I:lcurpinldidcUetters\minuteman press zoning inguiry.doc c: Jim Hendryx 2002 Planning correspondence file 13125 SW Hall Blvd., Tigard, OR 97223 (503) 639-4171 TDD (503) 684-2772 Appendix Three Deed and Legal Description 1...,,*;;;Ast.. • --,_,..,,,,- , ,• ..... .. _....„;Irov ,,..„,....,„,..ripm.z.„. .,m--z•::,,:.:,,,,,..,.."7:_...„ : 4,..,1,-..-r '1:`a9',:ro,'".41,LM2'; ;:,...;-..-Sc-tc3;7..,1•,•--• •:ultr..,,,,Cf,..".1.-.,'....:„ . ,,;...,..,,, r..,.. .. •;".•''‘'i PO!".'.. -414.7, ',.. ,,t, - ,, .,.4.-2E541,. ,,-.7.i:A3,„•,:ig..iid","-tat05..t.f.4 .: „,-;;;,„, .„,,:... ..;,,,,.,,e,..••• ,•-;.-z„... '.te...A;;',4444.itt;::::• ••VIii"?:1,!:.4-,S00,144:.,--t,....."tir-1,--., . . - . --''..". ••-: '...!.. .,'''.r - '- ' -.:-:: --:','•,.....-- " • .‘" • -..::..".':...;;;•47i-AT•'!' .I . - -. , ,.. . - ••-4-t.----••-,..------,-,---4-ii..•,,sezt,.4.4r.•,-;,:.-:-:. . . ..., .... , )]T LE . . : '.f.-_.--'-•-f‘- '''''''vl-- ''''--. ' TITLE INSURANCE Comply " • AFF.tx$ .._.. .... LR.S. ... .. . . ; q' : -.• Let'-----.;,:..-2.....t'...:. • • ‘• ....- .,;-M--.4:-TV•.."' '--‘,...7....:.-.-:.i:..;"-.;.!-..,.-;•,•.--'7•':?t...1144 46q2 A-...v.-.h . e • re,E.;tai A R R A tkl T Y DEED EED . I . --- I,. ,g, •64,,.,.U..-:-4K.,..,•4•0a..•,.,.f..-.4::•.•--•. ',,:....-,-,:7 sfs X/V0 W ALL hEN BY TIESPRESENTS,That.i.. - _ . - .. -__. '-1 Rainh Border and Milcd 13o'de husland and wife .. .•:.,• , . " ,`'.'...,-"t4-3.;:r;•:A::•:"••":../.....e.• ? .....,..,......4-,..„......... . ..-Ire t 4.t e.,,trets6.1,,,,61. 'ft . ...—-.............-----...........................-.-............._ ................-................----..........................—...-...gransor.a., -... ..44.. r . 1 : in cousideration oi Twenty-two Thousard and tIo/100 - - - - - - - - - - Dollars. ' ( 'rq.t.:"-2..-:,., -'...;.\"!1444014,-..1.'•.., • .7....;;.'"1-4f.41'..7.f-r•4 2 : 'G Ats.- paid by...J.:221a-1..a.......T.taer-s...and...Max.j.c..rie...A......1.oens....htishand...and...11.1Le.,.. i :. ....:-...:.:-i...-, •,..,•-..:•,,..-. 2:.!,'acr* 1,1..4 . : grantee .! if f',-.!....gt-.F.5%..--.4;-......'.,......... /i.; „ • do._...hereby grant,bargain,sell and ccns•cy unto the sail granteeS„,theilleirs and assigns.all a the fo.1-' I. 4';.r., ,:.-..,,....•-• '.....'.' ,.. i.;44,11.Tk,"11.2.4 i lowing described rea;property,with the tenements,hereditaments and appurtenances thereunto belonging, P,..:!'.37'-"•.,..'' 1 ; sittrated in the,Connty of. Washingt on State of Oregon bounded and described as follows. -4:-...,.A...‘,...=thulat. :' 4 ,5:.,'........s.:;.'..4Pa!"5.2e rG-w-fr: ' 1 .4•%...i-tr.it.....a,-,-,.•. - ...--.'"T-'77. rfr:TFTi5, •. *TY..?: .•'. .ti ..;. i.,;,..;-:•'••'......., =-•P.,,•,•:...1.-.5). .... ,. .,........ ., .. -'-..."-":^:"-n.;:.-;:e7*'!!t ' •4-...,4.,. gt , rr..:,••'. 1,.....:,. '•-,,,""i'.;:,•=•-•:-,1.q,. 4,c-i: i • Lot Tw4-ona (21) , HER1,10S0 BARK, Washinon County. Oregon 1 i.vaikAY.'1.,•:11. ..,..-•:.-. .7.3. ; ',;.te.%•'''''"'',u•'• =-• - ' = ,:-..,•P-, .-, . ,;..;4'..,1.tgi.,., :-_,•.1: — f7, .....■— , ,„ ifj,.. ...... 0,,,noN uuuN 1 f DOCUMENTARY E: .:k.:0-.1FiFit-4i.4.aW I „ .... - ......._. . .1,-17Al' -;,-, : .•t-- 1V3:40...,--' = !. fiO4,11,41.- •'.17:,,,..,-.'ilzr.44.4 1 1,; .' * ' .:::N---- t....,...„.... ,... .., ,_ i .,,,,, ,&,..t...,,..,...-_-.. ,... i f.,44,t .!:,..,:...,..,..:.L . ..',4,.....-.Z.-..T.:':.Tt,,,,,,.Lv• .4 x fORTI Z.-- ''''.----"--• • 1 — :;;'g.;-.7f7k.l& :; gk,...i'l.‘,...:IL.,......:',.:'::4'..'.. l' 4:.:::,zr'.;.1'.. :', ...0.7:,te.:WA., ' '' I :Uitirs?akialagai i R F,c/Arley.gds-.W..mil•n...-_,.;1..!... ;';Atia.I.r.:.?.Ni4g'.• 1 'I ...7,„•••-•-1.1;,'• ' .;-: 4 1 -;'1.1!'....e.'4:101-71,1It**7-::3., •".1-4."•:-' •,•,,,,,..c...so.....•,,,,i..-i.. .,,,,...,..-4-:-..,..,..., ;I ' -.41.f.t....:,t...-•=, -i.:=• 1 1 k.... '•r4;••••,..4, •••.. :"-.'.4-1) 1 Ve12-Wit:1;k.;•-....-:': :.-•' TO HAVE AND TO HOLD:he above tlribed and granted premises Ingo the said graruct% above 1' R•L-7,-AP;.:5-1-K- 7-:',:..f .:,:-.'-f rt; •.--;'.-.Lai:: and a.Ci IIV(are ve 7 A nd rhe gl.,rwar a 4 iTT cewert.tur wub the.alua,e fiaffted grantee s. their hei:::and assigns,Liza: ,;-,Z. ..tt..;•4,0. • ; • tP61.1.,,: i..5.;-;_?.: '..-}•::41 -. ,,„'.-4 .... we . la wittily seiz,.d in fee simple of the above gfatifell poen:ises,free and clear of 411 encumbrances, „I'ltt4k..k-..k';',:, .....:!- $ ":`5...,T,Va.41;‘,.. ,..„'T'4.4": I . . 4 ict;.:%4:•....:--..., •:4,4: itoli",,t,t , ". • • 1.:'•i::-.•••:=.y...Lit.i..••,..P.,. ` .;I.. . • . .. j L.,,,i417;ik,',.,f4YTAPT',,;',:7•`‘‘'..!.T. •.4,..V.,41'§t ■ arid that totu will and :;1.1 r....heir s.rzt•fe!Ito rs abd adrti.tistrarorv. Oral? warrant and lorcce, ‘1.. ...t."„ . .„:0 defend the alms.- g-'need !no:tn.:es and every part and parcel rhereol. akoinst the lawhsl claims 01. ,,,..). 5 P".A.IM-•-$•!':-.i...-,;4'.-'.1-•: .....,t-,..„;„,44,3;i42,4t,IM- .! f. .,o n c ti'vs 11,,'".'f.. .47..1/ -M'1•444K1r.4 1 • ...),./../ ' .g, _04(1,74.4.'...7;;;?•7%''f: WI-I'NESS Our Lett/IC .ah/ .ie.d f.-.;t,./1 N 1;X / da O Of j!lily .ig 61:i li ir.,;00.. ......,.f:i.,..,,...., ,, • :, ...„,,,........,.. ,,..,,...... . _,..•• ,--? , .. .'1."-'••• ';'..-•;,,:r.-.;'•'•-- 4,.....'.e.c4::.-f... „ , ,sr.:A I.., "L....•1:',..-..-; „.;;- - :T. 1-, ,t;;;i . '77'2•Xi.r..-..»,,,,, --4 1)1 • -1" ,. .. STATE.- OF OPF:GON. iep 1 . ., / ,,..;_. /./..,•T ..'. 'i 'se..•.).2.'..4';:-•.•'..*:, '.. -•":". • "• ..lilfr'' :SS. 4 41', -.2,,...:',••.....-‘.:, ..7-;:l.'.1.4:'-''..r.-.- ..-' 4 orwt-a-«:'-'..,0•7.,.--...-'...-;:-: 4.72...!4•413.,-.414-544- 44 . !...'nfir,;),Of .4..4.1.i:714.V..a.1 I / ' *4'04.'0144*.,0"-A.r.•.:!1/2 .1,' ,f,xii,..4,-ak$ --4- 4 ;! tii,t'-'4` 47.24.,iit.i.:t,.:**::•,,:* . . . -..•— rot' • • •- • (SEAL1 3 -;;;WAi,'...'•'..4'4>V-••:;,:',.4"...'• -,,o,...:-..i-pf!..,,:r •■•■■•,. :' ...: x eiA°.44,414t1,4",--i-TA on this ,..,(4i f j:T.j.n,, a'i 1.y ,s. ,'•":";',:7••:* '.1:•.;-t!-,s.r.7.%14,..4%,.1.-ma . ,A.D.:0- - ,before we the ii 1(7 a Notary Mobile .. ;.,....1,” ..:81...,•.pg-::•,-. .. .;44;L:.‘ttrciitl4d. att.doilar -.,in County and si.,..m.. ,,,,,,,,,,,tiv ape cared Otewithin naznr4 , ,....r.ri,...,-...o‘e,T.?:.'•.,...7 ti.n, ,•••.::.---At:.....;.:k.1,4:5,,...q, . „ . .... . •• . . :: et.::irvit.:!?..P;',..•'.,:::::;;.-.:.-. ...•7.':••.••• ' •.•:-• • .. . ...... ..... ... ..... . 4 B.7..74..,- IL., 40,.1..-...f •;..-;..t.• * Ilt.'.0 17.,,, :::,,i•-t,„;-,'-;..7. ....:43.*::".;.:r::::7.1.t..41.:. who ........axe -...:known to me to be the identical irdividnal s described in and who,veented 'he vvitnin ..2.,1-;',4,-Y,.•,"P i.. ••• i instrument,a•nd ackn-P h•ledger!:n n I,I ha f I.11 C S execared rhe same freely add V0h2Illarliy. •"7.::.,•f''+.1:"ilk.:...,. :; . II;VES.PLWONY WHEREOF',I have beterintco set my hand 3 l 7(1 Sea! '. 11 ` '''..!-:?:(,;'-,47,•-.. .•,,,•:•.:'•,-,-,,i...-!..t.* ....-.5:kil .: . ... 'In .... .•. th ..til:.arul year last.abos•e wlitten. ..•••••"?,,..".;:j.,;"Zai4 Y,,...e.„4 : .......,.... :,.'„:5'..k.A•VZI,.‘^' .'s __...71-:".. • My ..o /3 ,,,i':,e,....,•:;,•••••,7,•,. ,-4,,,.., , Co g isrna Ev un sri res •'..,-.1!.;t=•:*..1•••' ..y.L.1 ,i • ' Notary Pub!, for Oregon. . .-;''ttl.f.--ire• 4 • . . : E I.:.:F;:,Z ' i. ..;-vd' tTV•.?'"*:•17. .-- .-:.,-,,,•44•44,..Vq ;! ‘ "..X.:'''‘..4.F,Y'r... .: 0 WARRANTY DEED -,,-..-.,.....,,A44.0::. .; )5 i I, • •••,._ ittu .A- „C.7,A.,,T yE,OF :El:9 10,,t i n- / ff:V7*.,1t.::Vi•::::.:•t•'..„,‘..".."':.'. ,f,S,A.:st.,: • ,1 , ' i.1....i i. :. ,.......g144",..7:::]:',;.... 1•1”: ...`‘... ,4.4-70.:i•41;,,..s.`',u.ii 1 1 li .''" . ......444c,f...:,., 'Ne.,,"-igt.P.',?.,:^‘,,..";';',':.4..!. 1 ],ph Tordo: .. ., . i, .,,&•.404:0,r•:-.."..!„v,',.."-'‘.'i';:::••:•'=,.. .011Pgi 1 It ,. . - .•..... . • 4 ;....A..›.."•:',',TC•0"-•','' ••• • ' •'..24,....T.,e.1.':•••1"•'-'•-• .-. ...-•;',-,t3E., te,!..., i;P.1,7..e.f Od P.O.'z' i.:'..' .. _ - I.Rose:Thamst.zo., orrector Of Records nn.: Eif.cItet, 4.ra Ex4:411chi. Reorder of Canvey anccs : i•to'.. ,f4-Ny..--.:-..--,••••••-• •"---",0%,4.-,•.■•=... - 1 TO fon-so(d coonty, do•hor4Rv':cerptv mat rim wit,..•in Z I; ' insiru meld.of writing!.woe...,.Ian el ••••-•■...I.,. , 5)401.•(..;43.,Ft.':-1.,...7€i 7 1 -.•kn-:-4.--josz--4:.--..---.■:".1.-.- -''--'-""''.5-7•'?'- tl.=i ' '''''. " 1;,.701..n 1) .3-)ens ' =,;-• ,•',1.,...,,tt...' ., ;1 ct, 4; i. ' " - . • ' • - ' II ':''',..i.-1;;;; -P:--..•:-....- ---i.-: ?‘, 11,., -• ., N -n - .. ITN W• oT In Via aeorosot......--ta-...— -• • • ; ak...;:r' ',.4;31.-",.41,':t•:-,„'::::::F .........:.c.r.....J....-. ,.. ,. ....T.J....-1?.. . •• , .v.t, . t: ' 'er.14V'n..`4.••.•j''':•"',:.•'`'''. KT6M16 1 ii,$ o .if:0:001.0 RKTURN I:3 . ! ,:i ......1:i,:."2,-.'•:•...:',.:r,' A111.311 My trona avIti;Nei viihtgcri. er.',.., II ROGRR THOMSREN.Dirt:ter 0. . : '..1:sr.izi ......: ;...:.: ..,..:. ,.., -,a=.2.-.0•5 4 •••...-.:!••=4,..,,..--t,...,,„,. 6 II TITLE INSURtirr CrJto!NY Recants II Voc.--;(*,., 42.1 s. i.7.1. !=t)t.:1t1 i t .....-s.'H. ■ l . .-. 1 ,,,,v. , . ,...-. 0 7-..''..:;•.:S'Vf. V*P - 11 prstrj„."..:••••4 ....... ., II _ i. rt_ovfr _..V:...E..W!tt 4.,'.;...1• .`',....,'S.:..-A.,_ria; .t I I, LI uig Jut-ZS• 2-39 P111 TO . . , ....".T,'••6".6 ft.,,:r:F'",.''.:$';',,,''..'.. `:-..k: Nrcat 1.51032 PI -..',7,i-...",.;:a■T A Aga, _. . • . • • , , .•,,., ....• , . , ..,.. ... ..... . , . .. _ .. . . . . . S_.:WART TITLE OF OREGON, L.—. N This sketch is not intended to show all matters related to the property ••11 including,but not limited to area,dimensions,easements,encroachments or location of boundaries. It is not a part of,nor does it modify,the I commitment or policy to which it is attached. The company asumes NO LIABILITY for any matter related to this sketch. Reference should be made to an accurate survey for further information. S MAP NUMBER: 2S101AB 01501 400 j,:i-, ,;:; ; °► 1) ', 1404 : r,< �ar,°p w. II 1403 14 ,.:; ,•:„, aft.' 02 »rrrr,„ 1401 ':. • 8 13op 7 11 6 5 4 o 100, 3 •• ', ,O• —_---- 100' $ �� too' HER — °' MOSa • a Y ,� .°' p.�,1so7 �. WA x. Ispp �.0 o'S 1700 POO. •4 � • 1501 » 18pp 1601 Tar 16 ad Ny• g • oz 211 1 M ' -r 9 T 10 $ J\jJ 1, g o I 12 ° r 0 23 ! ae too. 13 b ►a0' " '0 too' •• • N..4•a.' 1609 tto' too af • 1502 : 16 08 t 10' t0° K 0••as : • i 0 1600 110' 100' too' _! 22 . • W 1606 1►0• r >•a�t' t 11 M 20 $ !9 8 1604 1 • a' 3�. �s�. • 16 $ it '� S� till. w W. • 7. 11°' • la. 2 4...a RO t s 700 1a°• �z B E VF A H 2701 2702=°•1 L D .. is 27 'to. — ROAD 24 • • 03 270420 _~ `— ----_ ▪ e 25 •w 270��° i • • •• 26 • ) 3 1:� • • p = 27 A I"1 : �� 2706 �o 28 2707 %/ I 2.? 30 W • o . I. ••avg. — /f/.f///Tse��//%ifSi „f�/i��/lij i •.a..' iii A iii' ice Sr F MAP FOR ASSESSMENT PURPOSES ONLY 2S I I DO NOT RELY ON FOR ANY OTHER USE Si EWART TITLE OF OREGON, INC. N tritm; This sketch is not intended to show all matters related to the property including,but not limited to area,dimensions,easements,encroachments or location of boundaries. It is not a part of,nor does it modify,the H E commitment or policy to which it is attached. The company asumes NO LIABILITY for any matter related to this sketch. Reference should be made to an accurate survey for further information. S MAP NUMBER: 2S101AB 01501 •O 100' 8 1 ?a -.—, R•25 160 7 :�a - �_ so, 1605104 1501 ► ' o • Id . . N • �� —r - 10 a -� 2! N 23 ii 3 ,� 110' w so 100 H. 04* '. . ��'n 1609 110' 1502 a• 1608 • r. a . e W 22 20 g 76.,,I 19• ►d 44 R 1s0' 20' s g Shio W. El1.71 ' 2700 12o ' ----___ Y 270, -�. 270212o' ® 2 o t 27Or�o�� 24 ; • 3 ~ 25 A a M • 4 • b IA ° 26 r) Y )7 i\ M _ 7545 SW Hermoso Way Tax Lots ►viI■lUl- Taxlots.shp Streets.shp Freeways Arterials Minor Streets Arterial.shp Freeways A/ Major Streets 111 8 IN Wash.shp 1. liii al ,, • MI III IF I : , .i.allir iii ill ifiall . • Stewart -----title of oregon v Wa N N GONZAGA i A 7 1 � 1 -7, E 0.05 0 0.05 0.1 Miles s Map Output Page 1 of 1 MetroMap ----- - -- _. t egend — $1raelNames Platys 1-• * C,ry rlal F `L ■ Fve 4.na:l \ + hest= c `� :wary ^.Lr5� 1 ---.— • Taxbts -- - -- Flre dislricls --. '`tERdfi"cti..- - Garbage haulers :y, - U Samar districts c _ �'l'Y ❑ Waterdrstricts Urban Gro.vlh Bnunda aW Parks r __ _ Clan%VawServicesDislriq – --_–_ -- TualatInVallayFiceBRescue --. -. ---- _------ —S-1 Pride D isposal \� Tualatin VallayWater Dist. ''� r t:).NL?kCA-S"- --- "`r:�• - .-- - - \ a` Cr�1ad}iy Aleln3 Dab P..ao..-ce C e-vI& Mti-o\/�.•.•nrx rneho-rg9c O'9krc - _ - 01 15$711 h ttp://quimby.metro-region.org:8080/servlet/com.esri.esrimap.Esrimap?ServiceName=metromap_boundar... 10/9/02 t ... �. ... w... O • . ttE'I t1RN RECORDED DOCUMENT To: • ' . . CITY RECORDS SECTION. . CITY Op11GARD . • 13125 SW Hell Blvd. - . Tigard,OR 97223 CITY OF TICkARD,OREGON RESOLUTION NO.99-•( .. U •'��y A RESOLUTION ESTABLISHING SANITARY SEWER REIMBURSEMENT -110 DISTRICT NO.15 • WHEREAS,the City has initiated the Neighborhood Sewer Extension Program to extend .. • Publics sewers and recover costs through Reimbursement Districts in'accordance with TMC . .. Chapter 13.09;and WHEREAS,the sanitary sewer improvements for the proposed ReimbursdnentDistrict are - • included in a Street Capital Improvement Protect;and . .. WHEREAS, those property owners have been notified of a public hearing in accordance with TMC 13.09.060 and a public hearing was conducted in accordance with TMC , .13.09.050;and • . ' WHEREAS; the City Engineer has submitted a Foport describing the improvements, the . area to be included in the Reimburscmart District, the estimated costs,.,a method for • ' .. spreading:the cost among the parcels within the District; and•a recommendation for ari • • . annual fee adjustment;an . • .. . • WHEREAS, the City Council has determined that the formation of a Reimbursement District as recommended by the City Engineer is appropriate. . NOW,THEREFORE,BE IT RESOLVBD by the Tigard City Council that: SECTION 1: .The City Engineer's .report titled "Sanitary Sewer Reimbursement .. District No.15",attached hereto as Exhibit A,is hereby approved. , • SECTION 2: A Reimbursement District is hereby established in accordance with TMC Chapter 13.09.The District shall be the area shown and described on Exhibit B. The District shall be known as "Sanitary Sewer.. - Reimbursement District No.15." . • • • SECTION 3 Payment of the reimbursement fee as shown in Exhibit A is a • .•precondition of receiving City permits applicable to-development of .. each parcel within the Roimbursement District as provided for in TMC • - 13.09.110. •- SECTION 4 An annual fee adjustment, at a rate recommended by the Finance .. ... Director,shall be applied to the Reimbursement Fee. • • . SECTION 5` The City Recorder dull cause*copy of this resolgtiott to be tffod in the ', ' . • omca of thpCounty Reocrder and shall than a copy of this reeolutiott.to • • • ell sffectod property owners at their last lmown address,in accordance . • ,. • with TMC 13.09.090.• •PASSED: . This day oEi31.tAPE .1994• •- A.. %Age i . . :• ' . -;- : - r-City of Tigard., - ATTEST: - .. •• City R000t+dcr-City of Tigard '' • • tl•• ,••, '>. F ,1� • Certified tObeaThii Copy of ;` 0 ,& Original on Ella l • • „ .• ' . Ity R -City of Tigard - - .. Date;_ a;1CtQ 3 . . . .. . ..,.. , .. • - . • Exhibit A I . City Engineer's Report • Sanitary Sewer Reimbursement District No. 13 Eat This project..will be constructed and funded under the City of Tigard '..Neighborheed Gavvar Extension Program(NSEP). Under the program the Citystf • Tigard would Install public sewers to each lot within a project area. At the time • the property owner connects to the sewer,the owner would pay a connection fee • 1- of $2,335.00 and reimburse the City for a fair share of the cost of the public sewer. There is no requirement to connect to the sewer or pay any fee until connection is made. In addition, property owners are responsible for disconnecting their existing septic system according tb Washington County rules • and for any other modifications necessary to connect to the public sewer. . Several developments along SW Beveiand St have been proposed Including the • Eagle Hardware project that would realign SW Beveland St at SW 72°Ave. The •• purpose of this project Is to Install the sewer before street Improvements are .. • constructed. in addition, eighteen of the twenty-five owners In the proposed • district have expressed support for the project as shown on the attached map. projectArea-Zone of Benefit • • An existing sanitary sewer line is located along the west property tine of 7850 • • SW Bevetand St., parallel to Highway 217. The new line would be extended to the east through an easement up to SW Beveland St. and would continue easterly on SW Beveland St. approximately 715 feet to provide eight services. • . The lot at the northwest comer of SW 72°Av.and SW Beveland St.has access to an existing sewer line crossing SW 72nd Av, so ft was not included in the Reimbursement District. The remaining lots along the south side of SW . Beveland St. are part of the proposed Eagle Hardware project and will not require service. The line would also be extended from the Intersection of SW • Beveland St. and SW Hermosa Way, northerly approximately 344 feet and easterly on SW Norms°Way approximately 365 feet to provide an additional seventeen services. There Is no need for future extensions of the proposed lines. ftoD1 ' The estimated cost for the sanitary sewer construction Is$148,830. Engineering • and inspection fees amount to$19,820(13.5%)as defined In TMC 13.09.040(1). The total project cost induding these fees Is $166.850. This entire amount should be reimbursed to the NSEP fund as properties connect to the sewer end • pay their fair share of the total amount •• • • • ' ..• In addition to sharing the coat of the public sewer line, each property owner wilt •. be required to pay an add,11<xial $2,336 Donne-dim and inspection fee when connection to the public line Is made, and will be reeponsible for all plumbing costs required for Work done on private property. Reimbursement Rate All properties In thia area are zoned Mixed Use Employment and have similar lot sizes as can be seen in Exhibit Map B. Therefore,it is recommended that the •-• total cost of the project be divided equally among the twienty-fiVe properties included In the reimbursement district Other reiritursement methods Include basing the proportional share upon the • square footage of each property or by the length of frontage Of each property. • Because all properties are similar in size, the square 'footage method Is not recommerided. The length of frontage method Is also not recommended - because there Is no need to extend the line the entire length of the one northeasterly property on SW Hermoso Way, and one northeasterly property on • SW Beveland Street,but the ilne will be extended along the entire frontage of the . one southeasterly property on SW Beveland Street that will not be served by this project Each property owner's estimated fair share of the public sower line Is $6,670. Should the actual cost exceed $8,000, each owner's fair share woidd be limited to$0,000 td the extent that It does not exceed$15,000,for connections completed within ono year of City Council approval of the final City Engineer's Report following construction in accordance with Rosalie:1On 08.61(attached). In addition to paying for the first $8,000, owners will remain responsible for paying all actual costs that exceed $15,(00: • Annual Fee Adjustment -• TMC 13.09.115 states that an annual percentage rate shall bfi applied to each property owner's fair share of the sewer line costs on the anniversary date of the reimbursement agreement. The Finance Director,has set the annual interest rate at 8.05%as stated In City of Tigard Resolution No.06-22. gasaminandatbn ft is recommended that a reimbursement district be formed with an annual fee Increase as indicated above and that the reimbursement district continue for • fifteen years as provided In the Tigard Municipal Code (TMC) 13.09.110(5). Fifteen years after the formation of the reimbursement district, properties • connecting to the sewer would no longer be required to pay the reimbursement . • fee. . . . . . . . .• •. • Submitted August 12, 1989 r n P.Duenes PE ngmeev • ►+{�.rb.+r.M•u p:.�rq/w. •• .. .. • .. • a • • • • • • • . . G .. .• .. . . • ..• ... .. . . . • . . . .. .. _ • • . . . IS . .... ..• _ .• .. .. • . . • . . .. .. • ... • • .., • ...":. .. .s. • .. ... ••••• . • . • , " • . • • . y.SUPPOR1 PROJECT • N..-OO NO SUPPORT PROJECT • ' BLANK-I NO RESPONSE • .. Inn �a,�laRl. • • RMOSO t A . • 0e.i -Ai, fig ,, :h f • .. r"l'''.1.:".;•. .. :(1,,i • '....:4 ..;.i,'-',-it.,-,"% :-.. - -1-..'WI::4...t:.. , . ..... .. - ' •BEVELAND . ST• : ' .• •.• •..� Yom,�` t.• Z• •. h GONZAGA • • 3 • • August 10, 1999 • CitY OF..h►AR© OREGON' • NOVICE ... . . . . . • Informational Hearing • NOTICE IS HEREBY GIVEN THAT THE TIGARD CFTY COUNCIL .. AT A MEETING ON . .. • TUESDAY,August 24,1999, .. AT 7:30 PM' IN THE TOWN HALL OF THE TIGARD CIVIC CENTER : 13125 SW HALL BLVD .. ;. TIGARD OR 97223 - TO CONSIDER THE FOLLOWING: • • Proposed Sanitary Sewer Reimbursement District No 15, The Tigard City Council will conduct an informational public hearing to hear testimony, - on-the proposed Reimbursement District formed to Install a sewer In Beveland Street and Herniaso Way west of SW T2ndAvenue. • Both public oral and written testimony Is Invited. The public hearing ot1 this matter will be conducted as required.by Section 13.09.060 of the Tigard Munldpal Code. -Further information and the scheduled time for this Item during the Council meeting may be obtained from the Engineering Department,13125 SW Hall Blvd.Tigard,Oregon 97223 or by calling 639-4171 extension 373. " 13125 SW Hall Blvd.,Tigard OR 97223(503)639-4171 100(503)604-2772 2 uo1A o11ao 23101A3 0120 . t1A1!'R DAItlEl E 8 '' BI UER DANIEL!?&BARBARA . ,.;12336 8W MO AVE . 7276 SW HEIRlA080 . P'OfCTl11I4D,OR 91227 TIG,R_D,OR 97223 28 101 A8-01300 23101 AB-01400 LIJJRENS ASCltAEL r• MARTIN GORDON 8 I. PO 80X 81 TO 12245 BW T2NO AVE 8UNR1VIER,OR 97707 TIGARD,OR 97223 2E101AS-01401 28101A8-01402 PHILLIPS JASON EICAROLYN L LYMAN RODNEYC MARGARET .. 1368 8W HERMOSO WAY 73S8 SW HERMO80 WY • TlOARO,OR 97223 TIGARD,OR 97223 25101A5-01403 . 2810IAB-01404 • • M U4 Y WI VON RENCtlLER MARV1N J a 7436 8W HE RMO60 WAY 7475 SW HERMOSO WAY TIGARD,OR 97223 TIGARD,OR 97223 • • 26101AB-01501 . •...-iA1o1AB�•oteoo . JOHNSON JERRY E SHARI A JOENS JOHN D MAAJORIE A . 7616 8W 84-W *IiO ST •. 7546 SW HERMOSO WAY TKTARD.OR 07223 • • TIOARD,OR 47223 23101A8-01602 20101A8-01600 ANDERSON ROY W ESTATE OF •. ERDI E WILLW/J 7666 LW HERMOSO WAY 7405 SW DEVELANO RD • TFOAfRD,OR 97223 TIOARO,OR 97223.• •• 23101AB-01001 28101AB-01692 . WtMTTNEY El/GENE P GIBBON KLAUS P&CORNELIA - ' 7340 SW HERMOSA W? • 10904 8W PA3RKW000 CT TIGARD,OR 97223 WILSONVILL,E.OR 07070 • 23191M-01533 • - 23101AB-01604 . FLVRLAN BRIAN&MAI •STORER LOUIE A&JESSIE L 7270 8W HERMOSO WAY 7305 SW BEVELAND RD TIGARD.OR 972:23 . 7223 TIGARD,OR 97223 • 28101AB01005 23101AB-01600 .. ROVIO CAROLE A •'SLOAN DAVID MARTIN 7460 SW HERMOSO WAY - 7355 SW BEVELAND RD • • - -TIGARD,OR 97223 TIGARD,OR 97223 26101A8-01807 23101AB-01008 • RANO STEPHEN C KOBERLEIN PATRICIA LYNN • ' 7540 8W HENMOSO WAY . 7456 SW BEVELANO RD CI• TIGARD,OR 97223 TIOARO,OR 97223 •..:: : , , ... ' ',.. • 1 •. _ ., •.. . .. • - . • . .. . . .. . ' . . . • . . . . .. ,. .. - - • . - .. . . - • . ''. . .. . . . • ....— . .tatiodiA4•0 i ace . • 28 la i AB-0 1l00. •.,.. ' • . . • .. • . . "TANtoR Ailf(41Y R • ROTH ALAN 0 AND LINDA A • . . .•• 1 1• . 71134 SW OleVELANG RD . 7420 8W HE R1.4050 WAY .. .. .. .• 1 ••TIGAPD.oR trr223 • TKLARO,OR li T223 . . • . . .• .. . , 2:1*01AS-01800 23101A8-02703 • BOEHM GK!NE 0 BEATRICE G . • RONOIES INVESTMENT LLC . ?Imo SW HER:A.406A WAY . 1600 0S-nAAN RD TIOARD,CR IV= ' - WEST LINN,OR 07•05.5 , . . . . • . . , • . . .. ,VII ICIAB-02744 ' , .. • • V.:.;14.1 pA1.10 ALLEN&BARBARA M'1. • . . . . - 7410 tic BEVELAND RD •• . .. -.... • . . . .. • .. •• .... , . . . . • .. . . . „ . . : . • - ' " . • . . .. .. • . • . . .. . • . ...- . • " - . .. . • . . ...- • • . , . . . - .. ' - .. . ." •• .. •.: . ., . . . . • . - . - . . , . .. .. • .. - - . • .. .. . .. .. - . . . . •• .. .. . 7 ...: • • • , . . . . . -- •• ... - . .... . : • . . . . • .. .. . •• ' •• . . , - ..• • . . . . . . . - . . .. . . • • . .. . * • . .. . . . • • . . . . ... - . .. . .a • . • • . . . . - . .... . . ..... . . • - " . .. . . . . . ., .. . .. . •• ".. ., •. .. •.: .. . .., .. . • . . - ••• ... .. . . . . - . . . ... .. . .• . . . • .. . ' •-• . " •• .• • . . . .. . . . .. , • . -•. • - . . . . . • • - . --••• - .- . - .. . . . .. . . . - • • . . . ' • . . . _ . .. .. . ••. . - . .. • ... ..." . .... .. . . .. ' .. .. . .. . • - • . ,. • . . . .. .. . . . . . .. .., . . - . • " . ... - ' •• _ .. . . . . . .. .. .. • .... .. . . •-• • .. .. .. . . .• . • .. .. . . . •• " . . - . : .. • . . . • . .. .. .... .. .:. . .. . • .. - • . . :. _ . . •• -- - .. . • ' • .. • . . . • . . " . . . • • .. .. . , • . . . , • • •.. .- .:- . . . .. •• ' . .. . . . . .. . .. - . . . . . • • .. - . . . . .... . ...... .. ... . . . .. .. . •• , . ,. . . . . .. . '•• • ..• .. • . - . . .. . . . . . •• •• . . . . • I ' •• ' 1 .. III — ir• „..,:::i!■ r. q • ;.. CITY OF TIIGARD,OREGON " •~• • • RESOLUTION NO 98- 51 A:RESOLUTION ESTABLISHING A NEIGHBORHOOD SEWER REIMBURSEMENT .. • DISTRICT INCENTIVE PROGRAM. • .WHEREAS, the City has Initiated the Neighborhood Sewer Extension Program to extend public sewers • through Reimbursement Districts in accordance with TMC Chapter 13.09;and WHEREAS,the amounts reimbursed by residential lot owners in the past have been below$8,000 per•. . .. connection;and WIIEREAS,.the reimbursement districts that are currently under consideration have estimated reimbursement costs ranging from$9,000 to$14,000 per connection;and • WHEREAS,the costs of reversing residential plumbing,closing the existing septic tank,installation of a `sewer lateral to connect to the public system,And p-nyment of the connection fee add several•thousand . "• dollars more to the burden of a residential lot owner who wishes to connect to City sewer,and WHEREAS,the City Council wishes to initiate an incentive program to encourage residents to connect to . public sewer;and • WHEREAS,the City Council finds that establishing a maximum reimbursement fee for residents to pay will further the objectives of the program by encouraging formation of sewer rehnburscment districts and actual connections to public sewer;and •. • • '•WHEREAS,based on previous reimbursement districts,the amount of$8,000.appears to be a reasonable • amount to establish as the maximum fee for reimbursement by residential lot owners;and . WHEREAS,the City Council concurs that the sum of$15,000 should be established as the maximum cost • • per connection;and • WHEREAS,the City Council wishes to offer this incentive program for a two-year period,after which the • • program will be evaluated for continuation. •• .. NOW,THEREFORE,BE IT RESOLVED by the T igard City Council that: SECTION 1: An incentive program is hereby established for the Neighborhood Sewer Extension : • Program with a maximum fee of$8,000 for reimbursement by residential lot owners. • This applies only to the reimbursement fee for the sewer installation and not to the • .. •. Connection fee,which is still payable upon application for sewer connection. SECTION 2: This Resolution shall apply to sewer connections provided through sewer • reimbursement districts established by October 12.,2000.All connections qualifying , RESOLUTION NO.98 1 t Paged I • • under this incentive program'must be completed within one year alter Councilappooval of the final City•Enginecr'c Report following a final public heating conducted in . accordance with TMC Section 13.09.105. - SECTYON 3: . The City Engineer's Report required by TMC Chapter 13.09 Shall include a provision that to the extint that the reimbursement fee determined in accordance with Section ' 13.09:040 doe not exceed 815,000,the amount to be reimbursed by an owner of a lot zoned single-family residential shall not exceed$8,000 per connection,provided the lot owner complies with the provisions of Section 2. Any amount over 515,000 shall be ' reimbursed by the owner. Residential lot owners who do not connect to sewer in" accordance with Section 2 shall pay the frill reimbursement amount as determined by the final City Engineer's Report. .. •• SECTION 4: The binding source for the Neighborhood Sewer Reimbursement District shall provide the funding for the installation costs over 58,000 up to a maxittruun oft 15,000 . per connection. . P D This 13 ' day of°CA-ObJ JL 1998: . ' . .. . .. . : r of...T.:City Clty o Bard ' ATTEST: •• - .. . - • City Recorder-City of Tigard 4 . IHrokl wst+r-lam . . . • • • RESOLUTION NO.98-5 t 1 1 •• Page 2 6. JO , .. . : OR EGON ,• STATE OP Iss .. •- . _ . - County Qt Wash! . ,� �. .. I.J'arri '�, � •0 County ment • #.� •t, r. To, fo 1. •, • +it .. Id t oevlt • I and It• fey of as ooun • * „sift •- r . f v .. r `4y6 .,`�ov • ,:o.„,•,-. ••Ireeolorp of N. .', , ovation,E�1-• Doc t 99103238 Reott 1398 0 91.00 0 /03J 9:44142es • • ."'Fii-1.. . • .. . .. t .. .. .. ..... 1 . . . , , , . - . . . . ; . • :,. •i RETURN RECORDED 1)OCUMIIN I'TO •', 'CITY RECORDS SECTION, ' CITY OF TIOARD 13125 SW Hai!Blvd. CITY OF TIGARD,OREGON Tiga d,OR 97223 " :�: .. .. RESOLUTION . TION NO.99-(05 . . kg .�y A RESOLUTION ESTABLISHING SANITARY SEWER REIMBURSEMENT DLO DISTRICT NO. 15 • WHEREAS,the City has initiated the Neighborhood Sower Extension Program to extend public sewers and recover costs through Reimbursement Districts in accordance with TMC . - Chapter 13.09;and WHEREAS,the sanitary sower improvements for the proposed Reimbursement District are . • " - inchided in a Street Capital Improvement Project;and . . - • . - WHEREAS, these property owners have,been notified of a public hearing in accocdarbee • .. with TMC 13.09.060 and a public hearing was conducted in accordance with ...TMC ' ... - •••• „ 13.09.050;and ' WHEREAS, the City Engineer has submitted a report describing the impnovenknts,the• • area to be included in the Relrnburserneat District, the estimated costs, a method for spr ing the cost among the parcels within the District,, and a recommendation for an annual fee adjustment;and WHEREAS, the City Council has determined that the formation of a Reimbursement ,. • District as recommended by the City Engineer is appropriate. _ • , NOW,THEREFORE,BE 1T RESOLVED by the Tigard City Council that: . • •SECTION I: The City Engineer's .report titled "Sanitary Sewer Reimbursement . . . Diatrlct No. 15",attached hereto as Exhibit A,is hereby approved. . .. . .. SECTION 2: A Reimbursement District is li«Gby established in accordance with TMC Chapter 13.09.The District shall be the area shown and described . on Exhibit B. The District shall be known as "Sanitary Sewer Reimbursement District No.15." - SECTION 3 Payment of the reimbursement fee as shown in Exhibit A is a .. precondition of receiving City permits applicable to development of • - each parcel within the Reimbursement District as provided for in TMC: , 13A9.110. • - • . SECTION 4 .. An annual fee adjustment, at a rate reconunended by the Finance • • Director,shall be applied to the Reimbursement Fee. . ON . ;� L . • SECTION 5 The City Recorder shall cause a copy of this resolution to bo filed in the • office of the County-Recorder and shall mall a copy of this resolution to • - ., all affected property owners at their last known address,in accordance . with TMC 13.09.090. • PASSED: This a q day o 1994. :. • • • • r-pity of Tigard 7 • • City Recorder-City of Tigard • • -a! } 1ih• �01 . .w.i :,S.'? ;e.'1 1;4'` : :. Certified to be$live Copy - •• -. ,;,( ;•:.:-."- e,A,.4,•,,...:,,,• • - Original on fill+ t aAci G �!(�.t l . ,. M C`l e patt;: z� • ' • . ' 3 . • • . • . . • . . .. .. . . ..• .. . . • . . . .. . . . .. .__, .. . . .. . . • . , . - Exhibit A . City Engineer's Report ' Sanitary Sewer Rel•mburssment District No. 15 . . . Background . . . . • • • This project will be constructed and funded under the City of Tigard • Neighborhood Sewer Extension Program(NSEP). Under the program the City of • Tigard would Install public sewers to each lot within a project area. .At the time .. the property owner connects to.the sewer,the owner would pay a connection fee , of $2,335.00 and'reimburse the City for a fair share of the oast of the public - • sewer. There is no requirement to connect to the sewer.or pay any fee until • . connection Is made. In addition, property owners are responsible for ' . disconnecting their existing septic system according tb Washington County rules and for any other modifications necessary to connect to the public'sewer. • Several devefopments'albng SW Beveland St have been proposed including the . ' • Eagle Hardware project that would realign SW Beveland St at SW 72nd Ave. The • . purpose of this project Is to install •the sewer before,street Improvements are constructed. to'addition, eighteen of the twenty-five owners in the.proposed • • district have expressed support for the project as shown on the attached map. Project Area-gone of Benefit An existing sanitary sewer line Is located along the west property line of 7650 ,. SW Beveland St., parallel to Highway 217. The new line would be extended to the east through•an easement up to SW Beveland St. and would continue • . easterly on SW Beveland St.'approximately 716 feet to provide eight services. The lot at the northwest corner of SW 72nd Av.and SW Beveland St.has access to an existing sewer line crossing SW 72m Av. so It was not Included in the Reimbursement .District. The remaining lots along.the south side of SW • •.Beveland St. are part of the'proposed Eagle Hardware project and will not , require service. The line would also be extended from•the Intersection of SW • . . " • Beveland St. and SW Hermoso Way; northerly approximately 344.feet and easterly on SW Hernioso Way approximately 355 feet to provide an additional • seventeen services. There is no need for future extensions of the proposed - .. • .. • lines. . Cost .• The estimated cost for the sanitary sewer construction is$146,830. Engineering and Inspection fees amount to$19,820(13.5%)as defined In TMC 13.09.040(1). • The total project cost including these fees fs $166,650. This entire amount should be reimbursed to the NSEP fund as properties connect to the sewer and pay their fair share of the total amount. .. . : 1 • • • . , . . „ . . . • • • • • • . In addition to sharing the cost of the public sewer line, each property owner will • • be required to pay an additional $2,335 c,onnection and inspection fee when • connection to the public line is made, and will be responsible for all plumbing • • costs required for work done on private property. • Reimbursement Rate • All properties In this area are zoned Mixed Use Employment and have similar lot • • sizes as can be seen In Exhibit Map B. Therefore, It Is recommended that the total cost of the project be divided equally among the twenty-five properties Included In the reimbursement district . . - Other reimbursement methods include basing the proportional share upon the square footage of each property or by.thetength of frontage of each property. • Because all properties are similar In size, the square footage method is not • recommended. The length of frontage**method Is also rot. recommended , • because there is no need to extend the line the entire length of the one • northeastedy.property on SW Herinoso Way,and one northeasterly property on . SW Beveland Street,but the line will be extended along the entire frontage of the one southeasterly property on SW Beveland Street that will not be served by this- • .• 'project, • • Each property owner's estimated fair share of the public sewer line is • ••• $6,870. Should 'the actual Cost exceed $8,000, each owner's fair share would limited to$8,000 to the extent that it does not exceed$15,000,for • •••.. • connections completed within one year of City Council approval of the final .• City Engineer's Report following construction in accordance with • Resolution 98-51(attached). in addition to paying for the first $8,000, . owners will remain responsible for paying all actual costs that exceed • $15,000. • • Annual Fee Adjustment • TMC 13.09.116 states that an annual percentage rate shall be applied to each • property owner's fair share of the sewer line costs on the anniversary date of the • reimbursement agreement. The Finance Director,has sot the annual.Interest rate at 6,05%as stated in City of Tigard Resolution No.98-22. Recommendation . It is recommended that a reimbursement district be formed with an annual fee • increase as Indicated above and that the reimbursement district continue for • fifteen years as provided In the Tigard Municipal Code. (TMC) 13.09.110(5). •• Fifteen years after the formation of the reimbursement district, properties connecting to the sewer would no longer he required to pay the reimbursement fee. • • •• . , . . •• 4 . .4 MI ... 41a • lill ■ .: . . •• • . . •.• ....... . •... •. • • r . : .. .. .r . .. .. . ....) .... ... .. . . .. -. . . . . . •• . . •• . . . • • ... . •• .. . . .. . .• ...... '••":. .. Sutrri!tted August 12, 1999 . . . . . ... _P c4a - . _ . . .. ._ . .. . .. . . . . ... .- C ngineer •. .. . • .. .. . - .. .. . 6141.11.41011***1•111(110,416•44k4 .. .. .. . .. . . . . . . . . . . 2 . •• . .. .. . . .• • ... •• . .. . . ' - • • ... .. . . • .. . .. .. ' • '.. ••• . . .... •• . ..• . • 4.. • . .. .. . .. ' . .. . •- . . . . . . . • .. . • • ..• • . .. . • . . • . . . . • • .. . .. . ... • . . . . . . ••• - • . .... . . .. . . ■ . . . .. . .. . -- .. . . . . . • ". .. . •... .. _ ' •. • .. -— . . . .. • • : •.... '• . .. .. .• . . . . .. .. .. . . . . . • . . . .. • . . . . .. .. . . . . . • .. .. . ... . . . . .. .. .• ••. . ,. . . . . .. .. . . . . . ... . . . . . . ' . . .• - . .. . . .• • " . . . • • . . . .. .. . . .. .. . . . . .. ..• - . - . .. . .. ". ... . . . .. . s . . - - .• . . . . . _ •• • ....: . . .... ... . -- • _ . • . . . .. .. .. " . . . ' . .. 1 . . . . . . _ .. ... ... . .. . . ' . •.. . .. . ... • . 7 4. . . . . -. . . . •• ' .. . . . •". . .. -. •• •• .. . . _ .. . . . .. . . ... . ' .. .. . . . . . .... • . . . : . . . . .. . _ .. . .. . . . . . . .. . . .• . .. .. . . •. . . . . . •' -s“ . '''''.. .:t • - - . • - .•eit—' „ - • .. . .. . . ' . , • ' . . .• .• . . ' . \•----- .----d...—... . . . ... . .. A.„ . . t4 "" —" • • . -, . . . . . • . . . . ' . ,. . . . . . ,. • . • .. . • - - ' . . . . • ' ' '• .. . ' . .. - • . - . . . . . ,.. . ' . . . .. ... . . . . - . .• ------7--------'• 4b------- - . . •• . - . ' ' '''.. ' • )• ---------- ' • , ' . ••• ''' - .• / • • - - ,------ ii: ...• •• • . pcso.. sct ..• . .. '.... • 10,006 :•....oaoRt IA° . .. "' . . . . ' . 042:415"7- ••• 1 - . 1,7,Itw . * . - . ..... :, ' ' ttes oo— 0900 _ . . . . .- ..1'0,. . , .. , . . - i ' • . .. • . • .•• . . • . •• . . . .. • .. .- . . ".•...n.:.:.....41.;frr-1‘. .. • --•.gts.,41..,'f'....'■. .i t,',t4A:I. • - - ..•....- . .. ',„....si.,..:.• ,;;;;_ , „: „?........: ,,,,:..,- -V. • ,. ' . f,.'-'..4 AV• .. •.4-,,X.,(.:I..%.Cy,:• •'.,t•. •... .. • .• ;•;:, •:421•.131! :• '.. •t••4;8*ii0V".•:`'••,:.'Ar.:... . ‘i'•' '. . '• • • ...IF;'. .A....1:" 's4 .„;,•a•ett..k,-;...-„,,WF.,:t.„2.....4-•••---- - . :.... •,, • . ..'t.ti•.:.-:itig; 4-7-,7-..".•••• ,-,•— . . • . • - . • • . ••it: .. , iEfttiOSN./ i .;), r., AN.,..!-- -• , „.•...1... A :.. - " • ' -- • ' 4';''s•-1` .0.:::.4•Ii•Ar..‘ • - ,..---q•!-'4".'.'-v-,'•;:; ".•:::':,4•., -'-)1.•''` i•I•t*.!.-:;'',V > .• .. . - . -..4.':4'..••••ta-.:.•,:1,- *4.41-.!.. ?.---::'•:•;-,1:••••••-,.%•,ttl-:)•:: '-il:itt, 44C • - - •- - . - . . . . . --„,,,•-•':. '..i,!- .` ":. ...;-:, -V-.:--*-. Yr..., • ;;R-•E'-'' . • - . ' •••••.-. .. .- •,T.-•. '.:-,,s-4. .."':•,..- ,.,...=-!: •••• -.`......g .. , . . -,;, ..1i; .,'..„1.-N--4-„-;•,s,, ;,..... ,: .....•,,,f1r,-••••• L ... , q...-.,.1,, . •- ... „, _:-..:.—4,c• ' 1....."*.%. ..„.t''' .1•.:7.. ''''• ..," If-: .- 414. .... .., ''' . ....gt••;:',.,••....•ik.,,S .. ,. • y••4,4,.... fti.- " ,-1,..;.• .,•• .." e .• X••,,i,;;::•';,.!":: ?4, '"i.t.i. ' ...• ...s;.- ;. 1:: ' `70•••••::. s - - • 3 ..,..,,,,,I; ,.,,,,.•.. , s' • •-•,..,..'-'.',4„ .• •s.11f: :-- -: .<4, t,• •s.:.....1 ... -- .. ilk O.. . . ,,, ,i •It,' . •. •••...; • ••• ' . ..,„-4:'• ..k • `4,.-4. 0 1 " *' is. • : :' . . . • ' •• ..'• " •• . . . . . . .. • . ., . ...•.1:- .'.. "...'44:•s. .• . •• ... • • •• .. . . . . . .. . . . •. . . CI .• • tr , . .. .. ' • •" ... •'. GOtAljiGN- * ., .• ... ,. . .. . ' . .... . •• • .. . . " . • . • . ' .. ,. ... • ' . . . ....• . • . • • • • . . . • . . . .. . . • I .. . .. • .. • ' • . . . ..‘. : • . .. . . • , '• . . ' . . . . . • • • . , 6 .. . .* '. ,' August 10, 1999 ' cnY OF TIGARD OREGON . . NOTICE . _. .. . . _ Informational- Hearing • . NOTICE IS HEREBY GIVEN • .. • THAT THE T(GARD CITY COUNCIL . • AT A MEETING ON • . TUESDAY,August 24,1999, AT 7:30 PM •.. .. •• • • .. .. IN THE TOWN HALL OF THE TIGARD CIVIC CENTER 13126 SW HALL BLVD ' .. TIGARD OR 97223 TO CONSIDER THE FOLLOWING; .. - Proposed Sanitary Sewer Reimbursement District No.15. • . The Tigard City Council will conduct an Informational public hearing to hear testimony on•the proposed Reimbursement.District formed to install a sewer In Beveland Street and Hermoso Way west of SW 72nd Avenue. .. . • • Both public oral and written testimony Is invited. The public hearing on this matter will be conducted as required by Section 13.09.060 of the Tigard Munldpal Code. Further Information and the scheduled time for this Item during the Council meeting may b obtained from the Engineering Department,13125 SW Hall Blvd.Tigard,Oregon 97223 or by .. calling 634-4171 extension 373. 13126 SW Hail Blvd.,.Tigard,OR 97223(603)639-4171 TDD(503)684-2772 . • • . .. • 1 • ..1.,,,I1 a , ,.. . • • . • •28101 A3-01100 .. `28101 A0-01200 . SAUER DANIEL E& DANIEL E&BARBARA 123356W 77NO AVE 7275 SW HERMOSO PORTIANO,OR 97223 TIGARD,OR 97223 • 2310I AB-01300 25101A2-01400. LAURENS MICHAEL P IMR71N OOTRDON 0 d PO SOX 3770 12285 SW 72ND AVE • SIXJRIVER,OR 97707 T1OARO,OR 97223 • 28101A8-0140i - 23101%01402 • PHILLIPS JASON ECAROI.YN I. LYMAN ROCNJEY C MARGARET .• • 73SS SW HERMOSO WAY 7395 SW HERMOSO WY - • • TIGARD,OR 97223 • .. TIGARD,OR 97223 • 25101AB-01403 ., • 25101AB-01404 MANI RY MARY • . VON RENCHLER MARVIN J&. .. • - 7435 8W HERMOSO WAY 7476 8W HERMOSO WAY .. TIGARD,OR 97223 . • TIGARD,OR 97223 • 23101A8 500 23101AB-01601 - - •- .. .: '' ' JOHNSON JERRY 6 SHARI A MA JOENS JOHN 0 RJORIE A 7015 SW BEVELIt4D ST 7646 SW HERMOSO WAY ' ' • TIGARD,OR 97223 •TIGARD,OR 97229 .. 28101A8-01602 25101A8-01000 • . AAIOEFtBON ROY W ESTATE OF ERDLE WILLIAM IAltt J . 7665 SW HERMOSO WAY 7405 SW BEVELA N)RO • •' TIGARD,OR 97223 • TIGARD.OR 97223 • . . •• 28101A0-01601 23101AS01602 . WHITNEY EUGENE P OLBSON KLAUS P&CORNELIA 7340 SW HERMOSA WY • 10904 SW PARKW000CT • . TIGARD.,OR 072.1 , WILSONVLS,E.OR 97070 23101A8-01603 28101AS-01604 - HARLAN BRIAN&MAI BTOOER LOUIE A&JESSIE L - 7270 SW HERMOSO WAY . 7305 SW BEVELANO RD 11GARD,OR 97223 • . TIGARD.OR.97223 213101AB-01005 23101A.8-01608 ROVIO CAROLE A SLOAN()AVID MARTIN 7460 SW HERMOSO WAY • 7355 SW BEVELAIIO RD. TIOARO.OR 97223 TIGARD,OR 97223 25101 A8-01607 28101A0-01608 RAND STEPHEN C • KODERLEIN PATRICIA LYNN 7640 SW IiERA10SO WAY C21 7455 SW BEVELAND RD . TIGARD,OR 97223 TIGARD,OR 97223 • • ... . . . . ... I . . • .. • • 219101A8.01000 29101AB 01700 ' • • TAYLOR JEFFREY R ROTH ALAN 0 AND LINDA A 7304 6W BEVELAND RD 7420 8W HERMOSO WAY . . . )111ARD,OR 07223 TIQARO,OR 97221 • 28101A8-0ta00 28101AB-02103 1/019-11.1 OE NE 0 BEATRICE 0 B1ONDIE'8 MNEBTMENT LLD . • 7300 BW HERMO A WAY 1600[PITMAN RO • "MART",OR 97223 WEST L14N,OR 87060 • 2a101A8.02704 , NI V141AM DAVID ALLEN a BARBARA AN 74108W 9fEVEUWO RD . • T1GAHD,OR 972.23. • • • • � Jo• . - .. I. ,. n , , , .ii CITY OF TIGARI),OREGON RESOLUTION NO.98- S l A RESOLUTION ESTABLISHING A NEIGHBORHOOD SEWER REIMBURSEMENT DISTRICT INCENTIVE PROGRAM. WHEREAS, the City has initiated the Neighborhood Sewer Extension Program to extend public sewers through Reimbursement Districts in accordance with TMC Chapter 13.09;and . WHEREAS,the amounts reimbursed by residential lot owners in the past have been below$8,000 per connection;and WHEREAS,the reimbursement districts that arc currently under consideration have estimated . t+elmbttacment costs ranging from$9,000 to$14,000 per connection;and WHEREAS,the costs of reversing residential plumbing,closing the existing septic tank,installation of a sewer lateral to connect to the publio system,and payment of the connection fee add several thousand dollars more to the burden of a residential lot owner who wishes to connect to City sewer;and WHEREAS,the City Council wishes to initiate an incentive program to encourage residents to connect to public sewer;and WHEREAS,the City Council finds that establishing a maximum reimbursement fee for residents to pay will further the objectives of the program by encouraging formation of sewer reimbursement districts and actual connections to public sewer;and WHEREAS,based on previous reimbursement districts,the amount of$8,000 appears to be a reasonable amount to establish as the maximum fee for reimbursement by residential lot owners;and WHEREAS,the City Council concurs that the sum of 515,000 should be established as the maximum cost . per connection;and • WHEREAS,the City Council wishes to offer this incentive program for a two-year period,after which the program will be evaluated for continuation. • NOW,THEREFORE,BE IT RESOLVED by the Tigard City Council that: SECTION 1: An incentive program is hereby established for the Neighborhood Sewer Extension Program with a maximum fee of$8,000 for reimbursement by residential lot owners. This applies only to the reimbursement fee for the sewer installation and not to the connection fee,which is still payable upon application for sewer connection. SECTION 2; • This Resolution shall apply to sewer connections provided through sewer reimbursement districts established by October 12,2000.All connections qualifying RESOLUTION NO.98-5 i Page 1 f under this incentive program mast be completed within one year after Council approval of the final City Engineer's Report following a final public heating conducted in • accordance with TMC Section 13.09.105. SECTION 3: • The City Engineer's Report required by TMC Chapter 13,09 shall include a provision that to the extent that the reimbursement fee determined in accordance with Section 13.09.040 does not exceed$15,000,the amount to be reimbursed by an owner of a lot zoned single-family residential shall not exceed$8,000 per connection,provided the lot owner complies with the provisions of Section 2. Any amount over$15,000 shall be reimbursed by the owner, Residential lot owners who do not connect to sewer in ' accordance with Section 2.shall pay the full reimbursement amount as determined by the final City F.ngilrcer's Report. • . SECTION 4: The funding source for the Neighborhood Sewer Reimbursement District Program shall provide the f nding for the installation costs over$8,000 up to a maximum of,$15,000 per connection; • • PASSED: This 3 day of � ��J • • Ii■,/✓ : .. •, -City of tgard • ATTEST: • • City Recorder-City of Tigard 4 • • • • RESOLUTION NO.98-1,1 • Page 2 • 3f114 03NOZ 321V 13181SI0 1N3 N3SNf1OWi3U 3N1 NI S31183d08d 11Y :310N (C09171)M121 SZl t NOUO3S 1/1 3N >/l M/N (Z091'1'1)M12:1 SZl t ROU33S >/t 3N 1/l M/N (109111)MW SZl l NOI133S >/i 3N '/1 AI/N (00911'1) Mla Sit 1 NOU33S VI 3N >/I M/N (ZOS111)MW S&L l NO1.133S >/l 3N i/l M/N (*OLZ11)M18 Sil 1 N0U33S VI 3N 1/I M/N (109111)MW SZL l NO1133S 1/t 3N VI M/N (sOLZ11)Mid Sil l N01.1.33S >/l 3N ill M/N 00611'1)Mld Si! I NOI133S WI 3N ill M/N (009111)M121 SZl l NO1133S >/i 3N VI M/N (i01.111)Mid Si! 1 NOU33S VI 3N 1/l M/N (00.011)Mld SZl 1 NOU33S VI 3N VI M/N (0011 7'1)Ml2J Si! t N01133S >/l 3N i/l M/k (609171)MId Si! I NO1133S >/I 3N 1/l M/N (ZO1,11'1)MIN SZl I N01133S >/t 3N ill M/N (909111)MW Si! 1 N01133S VI 3N 1/t M/N (10+11'1)MW Sil t N01133S >/i 3N 1/1 M/N (L09111)M18 Si! l 1,011335 VI 3N 1/1 M/N (001,111)Mid Si! t N01133S 1,/I 3N 1/1 M/N (9091'11)MIN Si! 1 NOU33S 1,/I 3N 1/1 M/N (00fI'11) MIN Si! t NO1133S VI 3N i/i M/N (S091'1'1)Mid Si! l NO1133S 1,/I 3N 1/I M/N (00Z1-11) Mid Si! l N01133S 1,/I 3N 1,/I M/N (109111)Mill SZL I NOu33S 1/1 3N VI M/N (00111'1)MI8 Si! 1 NOU33S 1/I 3N 1,/i M/N :NOI1dI83S30 7VD3l dW )JINI3IA UUIHSVM MIVOII J._L10 .]S / b/ L ]N -b/ L MN �1 -SECTION 'I T2S RI W W.M, ,SH1NGTON COUNTY, OREGON ; pp il • rS• r 111• * HERM(pg4�� i . ; 4',."moo:.. ; A rah•r'..-.*".i-:4.:*?:".-.:*.i".:*•1..''"..:1::••:.: '7 3 4 3,rs4:j$+t I 3.t A 1ha.w...s..3 a,,u,r" •'! tmi.aaa ai •f. •"'iv tk...r.. jbai. a li n'I.4 viZ eEli-v As-NsD i SI,-mT#a , Iii; di1 1,U I_# . . • '";,, PROPERTIES 1NCLUOED IN 1 "' REMBURSEALENT DISTRICT -SS- EXISTING SANITARY SEWER UNE EXHIBIT "B' ._ PROPOSED SANITARY SEER LINES NOT TO SCALE SW SEVELAND ST & SW HERMoso WAY . WANRARY SEWER EXTENS3ON ZONED FAKE S ! PVA4fY0(f .i► L 1WWV c P ay rL(in iN 1 MQ MAN. F¢.��LPLl ora_w WWWW R1 Stewart Title Guaranty Company, Stewart Title Insurance Company, Stewart Title Insurance Company of Oregon, National Land Title Insurance Company, Arkansas Title Insurance Company, Charter Land Title Insurance Company. Privacy Policy Notice PURPOSE OF THIS NOTICE Title V of the Gramm-Leach-Bliley Act (GLBA) generally prohibits any financial institution, directly or through its affiliates, from sharing nonpublic personal information about you with a nonaffiliated third party unless the institution provides you with a notice of its privacy policies and practices, such as the type of information that it collects about you and the categories of persons or entities to whom it may be disclosed. In compliance with the GLBA, we are providing you with this document, which notifies you of the privacy policies and practices of Stewart Title Guaranty Company, Stewart Title Insurance Company, Stewart Title Insurance Company of Oregon, National Land Title Insurance Company, Arkansas Title Insurance Company, Charter Land Title Insurance Company. We may collect nonpublic personal information about you from the following sources: • Information we receive from you, such as on applications or other forms. • Information about your transactions we secure from our files, or from our affiliates or others. • Information we receive from a consumer reporting agency. • Information that we receive from others involved in your transaction, such as the real estate agent or lender. Unless it is specifically stated otherwise in an amended Privacy Policy Notice, no additional nonpublic personal information will be collected about you. We may disclose any of the above information that we collect about our customers or former customers to our affiliates or to nonaffiliated third parties as permitted by law. We also may disclose this information about our customers or former customers to the following types of nonaffiliated companies that perform marketing services on our behalf or with whom we have joint marketing agreements: • Financial service providers such as companies engaged in banking, consumer finance, securities and insurance. • Non-financial companies such as envelope stuffers and other fulfillment service providers. WE DO NOT DISCLOSE ANY NONPUBLIC PERSONAL INFORMATION ABOUT YOU WITH ANYONE FOR ANY PURPOSE THAT IS NOT SPECIFICALLY PERMITTED BY LAW. We restrict access to nonpublic personal information about you to those employees who need to know that information in order to provide products or services to you. We maintain physical, electronic, and procedural safeguards that comply with federal regulations to guard your nonpublic personal information. Appendix Four CWS Service Provider Letter _ U6/IG/UJ Utf:41 rte SUSS4ti3525 CLEAN WATER SERVICES LQ1 U01 06/19/03 09:37 FAX 503 639 f Ij 001 TATN 1 0 2Ci]3 f;lc 3IZ �t C1eanWater� Services SY our commitment is clear. Sensitive Are re creening Site Assessment Jurisdiction 014-7 of 1-(40,rd Date 6-/a-o3 map & Tax Lot as iv/A/3 ©i of /Poi Owner ►ti,invh:ro,v„ Pre s; Site Address _ 7Pis Su Hergoso WkV 61-41. 1°urcc�►��hc. 71J04-4 ,09 97i.3 Contact &Ike (fie Zeor Proposed Activity Nc4, Gons-hw-}inn Address - pQ lac* D.3_S/f fCi . Par-1-10..1 orc 472 S d-3S! Phone So3- i:?- 6117 - Y N NA Y N NA R1 pi U Sensitive Area Composite Map n I ] ® Stormwaer Infrastructure maps Map# 7-5i w4 QS# 1f3.2 / Y N NA Y N NA f pi Locally adopted studies or maps E WI Other Specify Specify Based on a review of the above Information and the requirements of Clean Water Services Design and Construction Standards Resolution and Order No. 00-7: I 1 Sensitive areas potentially exist on site or within 200' of the site.THE APPLICANT MUST PERFORM A SITE CERTIFICATION PRIOR TO ISSUANCE OF A SERVICE PROVIDER LETTER OR STORMWATER CONNECTION PERMIT.If Sensitive Areas exist on the site or within 200 feet on adjacent properties, a Natural Resources Assessment Report may also be required, Sensitive areas do not appear to exist on site or within 200' of the site. This pre- screening site assessment does NOT eliminate the need to evaluate and protect water quality sensitive areas If they are subsequently discovered on your property. NO FURTHER SITE ASSESSMENT OR SERVICE PROVIDER LETTER D:3 REQUIRED.THIS FORM WILL SERVE AS AUTHORIZATION TO ISSUE A STORMWATER CONNECTION PERMIT. The proposed activity does not meet the definition of developmere. NO SITE ASSESSMENT OR SERVICE PROVIDER LETTER 15 REQUIRED. Comments: a rd, • ; p - e - .,ti o - i:, • Reviewed By: / Date: C Ll_g_ Post-it'Fax Note 7671 Date 405 jpages► I Returned to Applicant To �1 t!e ['Lev, From`� Mail _Fax y, Counter 1 `eA ``��®'� Date 1-f a 3 S� Co/Dept. /• 7 I f co. /��5 • ��/ 1� Phone# Phone#703- 6-3 SS3 Fax#3-03,617_ 6/3a Fax Appendix Five Neighborhood Meeting Affidavits & Notes AFFIDAVIT OF MAIL s/POSTING NEIGHBORHC*D MEETING NOTICE IMPORTANT,3NOTICE ;THEIIPe CANT 1S REQUIRED 10'MAILIHE.,(ITY OF_TIGARD A`COPY,10F 1HE .4.. 1 NEIGHBORHOOD'MEETING:'NOITCE THAT. RRTAIHS'TO THIS-AFFIDAVIT AT THE SAME liME PROPERTY OWNERS ARE MAILED NOTICE, TO THEADDRESS BELOW: =City.of Tigard'Plan ning:Division • `• 13.125 SW Hall Boulevard Tgard, OR 97223-8189 IN ADDRt;N,'JHE APP aICANT„SH441-10MIT HIS. IFRDAVR&4COPIEs OF ALL NOTICES AT THE TIME OF-APPLICATION„ MAILING: 1, P4 I C.i,„e) Kd2.e , being duly sworn, depose and say that on the -�g;l, day of Ray 2003 , I caused to have mailed to each of the persons on the attached list, a notice of a meeting to discuss a proposed development at(or near) 75141 S" l-fe;wIDsj vy T r q Ors, , a copy of which notice so mailed is attached hereto and made a part of hereof. I further state that said notices were enclosed in envelopes plainly addressed to said persons and were deposited on the date indicated above in the United States Post Office located at l�a�:( Drc-p.) with postage prepaid thereon. ( Signature (In the p r esence of a Notary Public) POSTING: I, e I 14,2t c , do affirm that I am (represent) the party initiating interest in a proposed -Ord G>- affecting the land located at (state the approximate location(s) IF no address(s) and/or tax lot(s) currently registered) °75-''. He.rr10f4 t T?�:• 't .c�r,.� lnd did on the 29 ri" day of /'- , 20 0.3 personally post notice indicating that the site may be roposed for a -"..14 1.4 t_ application, and the time, date and place of a neighborhood meeting to discuss the proposal. The sign was posted at 75'i . n,c,-,"s�S: w; TM ¢4 c. (state location you posted notice on property) Signature (In the presence of a Notary Public) (THIS SECTION FOR A STATE OF OREGON, NOTARY PUBLIC TO COMPLETE/NOTARIZE) STATE OF ) County of V. ) ss. Subscribed and sworn/affirmed before me on the day of L , 20 . 4 Alt., OFFICIAL SEAL 4 S '► „ AMANDA FLAIG ` w NOTARY PUBLIC-OREGON '- `cO COMMISSION NO.A329592 MY COMMISSION EXPIRES DEC 5,2003 NOTARY PUBLIC OF OREGON M Commission Ex•ires: - — - Applicant, please complete the information below: NAME OF PROJECT OR PROPOSED DEVELOPMENT: Y1%) r�i t/4e-M.+,1 £t'a„�,,:, TYPE OF PROPOSED DEVELOPMENT: OI ,2 1�k,.J . Address or General Location of Subject Property: �,�./� s ge..-A,nTd, •-j �;y,,✓ o.-c •, Subject Property Tax Map(s)and Lot#(s): a,S l0( A-R / 1. at hgoginWatty\n+asters%affidavit of man g-posbnq nelghboMood meeting.doc GRAY PURCELL GENERAL CONTRACTOR 5-29-03 RE: Minuteman Press of Tigard Dear Interested Party: Gray Purcell, Inc. is representing the owner of the property located at 7545 SW Hermoso rd. tax map 2S 101 AB lot 1501. We are considering proposing a site development review at this location. Prior to applying to The City of Tigard for the necessary permits, I would like to discuss the proposal in more detail with the surrounding property owners and residents. You are invited to attend a meeting on: Thursday June 12th 2003 Landmark Ford 12300 S.W. 68th 6:00 P.M. Please notice this will be an informal meeting on preliminary plans. These plans may be altered prior to the submittal of the application to the city. I look forward to more specifically discussing the proposal with you. Please call me at (503) 639-6127 if you have any questions. Sincerely, ,014) Mike Kezeor Project Manager 11445 S.W. Tiedeman Ave. • Tigard, Oregon 97223 TEL(503)639-6127 • FAX(503)639-6130 P.O. Box 23516 • Portland, Oregon 97281-3516 OR CCB#79018• WA REG#GRAYPI*022Q4 Neighborhood Meeting Minutes Thursday, June 12, 2003 Meeting Time: 6:00 P.M. Meeting Location: Landmark Ford Conference Room 12000 SW 66th Avenue Tigard, Oregon 97223 Purpose of Meeting: (1) Required meeting as part of Site Development Review—Type II application. (2) To discuss with attendees our intentions to remove the existing residence and construct a new commercial office building. (3) To discuss the proposed project,timelines and office use once the project is complete. Attendees: David Waters 5335 SW 42nd Ave., Portland, OR 97221 Realtor Agent Harish Patez 7615 SW Beveland, Tigard, OR 9723 Neighbor Mary VonRenchler 7475 SW Hermoso Way, Tigard, OR 97223 Neighbor Bob Davidson 23792 Robson Terrace, Sherwood, OR Developer Mike Keezor Gresham, OR Contractor Rory Antis 24495 NE Hwy 240, Newberg, OR 97132 Minutes (Meeting started at 6:10 p.m.) I. Introductions II. Purpose of Meeting—Read prepared statement from City of Tigard III. Presentation of proposed project Site Plan and Elevations IV. Comments, Questions and Answers a. (Mary) Who is the tenant? Answer: Minuteman Press b. (Dave) Front of building looks nice, resembles house not an office Answer: (Bob) Traditional style, Timeless architecture, warm feel, and welcome. c. (Mary) What kind of increased traffic? What kind of other tenants would there be? Concern of traffic and strangers. Children present in neighborhood and pets. Answer: (Bob) The employees will be arriving in the morning and leaving in the afternoon. Customers rarely come to the office. We make deliveries 2 to 3 times per day. Paper is delivered in the morning and the UPS truck picks up almost every afternoon. d. (Mary) What street will the deliverers use? Answer: (Bob) They will probably use Beveland. e. Answer: You can't I make the will tell muse f. (Mary) There them they must use eland? g. and would has been increased Bev eland. Answer: What is Preferred jf d tr c fro �Rory) 125W1.50'.thesi2e o � you c m Low h. Is the house t(Bob. get them to use peed a problem. relocated Bob taken out salvage then Mob) wf01)) completely? i. ISM company to come down°D1d e to reloca jnuteman d take b) Ifrt c to the house. w�wer' Bobs franchise? out whatever they�Ot be relocated If It�not j. { de• s, but independently owned. use we may call a (Mary) y to earesi t sthetime.fr There are ab° 1 ddin D for Site s? 86D location (Tlarrs anent concentl ew m the new k. Answeh) 3200-3300 many squar y This process few d atys. We Fill 1 «Iasb squaw foot is the°ice? take apProatsubmit Answer: Where Y wer; does the footprint (Rory) ninoff does clarified he Ovate water go.rons rn (x ow before emotininto the swale at the eh) Will you be PrDpe'�3'to the�asrtt end of the said the Weevenogtheshrubs northwest. It property he tkc not yet determined alo off' it trees taken fir trees need no I had if the(rear)property n n down will bceet°acme down take will keep line? are(Maly) W� be a Placed inch birch se they�eat the arbor vitae, e Anse, there there It (Rory) We fence around t site Ike fence a privacy are not and the In the Y issue, The We will not Tigard T • , a fence g to have�e ? fence. like b1)�aThereb�se putting u I don't e businesses preferred. You wan was installed link tie existing up 4 fence. usznesses Bob) There installed nces foot chain A chain fences will (Mary) situation on the sRory hair Bain nces be no 0 on byremovin neighbor e exist chain around the woularound them. (Hanish) How is g the fence he South's pra link fencethe�r°Perty ugly.be the trash enclosed? We will re l fy the n down. Will you see it? Answer: (Rory) We are proposing a trash enclosure (here). The exterior materials of the enclosure will be similar to the building, to tie them together. You will not be able to see through the enclosure except the cracks around the gates. There will also be recycling inside. (Bob) The paper recycling will be inside the building, so it does not get wet. Meeting ended: 6:45 P.M. Second Meeting (A second meeting was required, because the meeting facility did not have an elevator.) Meeting Time: 6:50 P.M. Meeting Location: Landmark Ford Conference Room 12000 SW 66th Avenue Tigard, Oregon 97223 Purpose of Meeting: (1) Required meeting as part of Site Development Review—Type II application. (2)To discuss with attendees our intentions to remove the existing residence and construct a new commercial office building. (3) To discuss the proposed project,timelines and office use once the project is complete. Attendees: Alan Roth 7420 SW Hermoso Way, Tigard, OR 97223 Neighbor Linda Roth 7420 SW Hermoso Way, Tigard, OR 97223 Neighbor Bob Davidson 23792 Robson Terrace, Sherwood, OR Developer Mike Keezor Gresham, OR Contractor Rory Antis 24495 NE Hwy 240, Newberg, OR 97132 Minutes (Meeting started at 6:50 p.m.) II Introductions III Purpose of Meeting—Read prepared statement from City of Tigard IIII Presentation of proposed project Site Plan and Elevations Comments, Questions and Answers: a. (Linda) Are you taking the house out? Answer: (Rory) Yes. The house will be relocated,recycled or torn down. Our preference is to have the building relocated. (Bob) We would like to see the building relocated. It is a good well built home. If we can't move the building we will contact a company to salvage the building. There is a lot of good materials (i.e. hardwood floors). b. (Alan) What kind of traffic will it generate? Answer: (Bob) Our company will generate 8 trips in and out. There will also be deliveries 3-4 times per day. c. (Alan) How long have you been in business? Answer: (Bob) 15 years d. (Alan) Where? Answer: (Bob) Canterburry Square. e. (Alan) Are you from this area? Answer: (Bob) Yes, grew up in Gresham. Moved to Sherwood. Bob also discussed his involvement in the community and community groups. f. (Alan) What type of business is leased space? Answer: (Bob) Office, professional(attorney, CPA, engineer, etc.) This is not a storefront. We are not looking for retail tenants. g. (Alan) Will this building fit in with future development? Answer: (Bob) Yes, with the brick design. The traditional style never is out of style. (Rory) The building is designed to fit into the neighborhood now and in the future. h. (Linda) How long will the construction take? Answer: (Rory) 6 months. i. (Alan) When will the construction start? Answer: (Rory) In about 10 weeks. j. (Alan) Have you had good success with City of Tigard? Answer: (Rory) We have had no obstacles to this point. k. (Linda) What is happening with property next door? Answer: (Bob) The owner will use the house as an office. 1. (Alan) Nice concept in architecture, I like the design. How many square feet? (Rory) 3200 square feet on the first and second floor, 840 square feet in the attic. m. (Alan) Is the stairs the only way to the upper floor? Answer: (Bob) Yes. We are not putting in an elevator. (Alan) I am not looking for an elevator and don't believe you need one. n. If you need any handicap information, please feel free to contact me. Meeting ended: 7:35 CITY of I A' GEOGRAPHIC INFORMATION SYSTEM CLINTON AREA NOTIFIED (500') FOR: Mike Kezeor DARTMOUTH RE: 7545 Hermoso (2S101AB 1501 ) 1 t. g fi f A 411e ttf b.l' rsc Y s Property owner information �.L..1. is valid for 3 months from ' the date printed on this map. F z .T C t .a r, \- nvwswn m. •1ewe11061 J � LL i �ws 'IMMO alf HERMOSO INA swan sswsno, npwoso ne0esome r`' r--- ue Q, 751101A11011501 owesoai nnasosal BEVELAND _L �ssuee:t°1 ml nnsozlo IS..s nwa nsiaeertw nswozS s BEVELAND ST 0 100 200 300 400 500 Feet 1"=335 teal n11a1CYOW Z A GONZAGA ST City of Tigard m Information on this map is for'general location only and should be verified with the Development Services Division. 13125 SW Hag Blvd _ Ti'gsrd,OR 97223 (503)03, httpAwnv. Community Devt. nt Plot date:May 28,2003;C:U. AGIC03.APR 2S 101 BD-00100 2S101AB-01502 ACKERLY COMMUNICATIONS OF HERMOSO LLC THE NORTHWEST INC PO BOX 1876 3601 6TH AVE S LAKE OSWEGO,OR 97035 TATTLE,WA 98134 2S 101 AB-01800 23 101 AB-01501 BOEHM GENE G BEATRICE G JOENS JOHN D MARJORIE A 7380 SW HERMOSA WAY PMB 162 TIGARD, OR 97223 11575 SW PACIFIC HWY TIGARD,OR 97223 2S101AB-01403 2S101AB-01402 COLWELL GREGGORY W LYMAN RODNEY C MARGARET 7435 SW HERMOSO WAY 7720 SW ELLERMAN LN TIGARD, OR 97223 DURHAM,OR 97224 2S 101 BA-00200 2S 101 BA-00401 COSTCO WHOLESALE CORPORATION MARTIN GORDON R&SHEILA ATTN: EXCISE TAX DEPT 111 12265 SW 72ND 999 LAKE DR TIGARD,OR 97223 ISSAQUAH,WA 98027 2S 101 AB-02705 2S101 BA-00300 EAGLE HARDWARE&GARDEN INC MARTIN GORDON RICHARD& ATTN:TAX DEPT(TA3) MARTIN GORDON STEVEN PO BOX 1111 PO BOX 740 NORTH WILKESBORO,NC 28656 GLENEDEN BEACH,OR 97388 ,101 AB-02702 2S 101 AB-01400 - LE HARDW•' &GARDEN INC MARTIN GORDON S& ATTN: t D- 'T(TA3) MARTIN GORDON R PO BO. BY IPM NOR H WILKES:ORO,NC 28656 721 SW OAK ST#100 PORTLAND,OR 97205 2S 101 AB-02701 2S 101 AB-02703 E E HARDW & GARDEN INC MCCAFFERY HUGH R&NANCY J TRS ATTN. PT(TA3) 7450 SW BEVELAND ST STE 100 PO 1111 TIGARD,OR 97223 RTH WILKESBORO,NC 28656 2S 101 AB-02700 2S 101 AB-02704 E• LE HARD • 'E& GARDEN INC NEWHAM DAVID ALLEN&BARBARA AN ATTN: • . i PT(TA3) 3435 HENDERSON RESERVE PO v.: 111 ATLANTA,GA 30341 •RTH WILKES:ORO, NC 28656 2S 101 AC-01900 2S 101 AB-01401 EA P HARDWAR GARDEN INC PHILLIPS JASON E/CAROLYN L ATTN: (TA3) 7355 SW HERMOSO WAY PO B 1111 TIGARD,OR 97223 TH WILKESBORO,NC 28656 ;101AB-01600 2S101AB-01607 :DLE WILLIAM J RAND STEPHEN C . .05 SW BEVELAND RD 7540 SW HERMOSO WAY TIGARD, OR 97223 TIGARD,OR 97223 2S 101 AB-01606 ROBERTS KAREN M 7355 SW BEVELAND RD PORTLAND,OR 97223 2S101AB-01700 ROTH ALAN D AND LINDA A 7420 SW HERMOSO WAY TIGARD,OR 97223 2S101AB-01605 ROVIG CAROLE A 7460 SW HERMOSO WAY TIGARD,OR 97223 2S101AB-01500 SJP LLC 7615 SW BEVELAND RD TIGARD, OR 97223 2S101AB-01604 STOBER LOUIE A&JESSIE L 7305 SW BEVELAND RD TIGARD,OR 97223 ,101AB-01609 TRIANGLE PROPERTIES 7505 SW BEVELAND RD TIGARD,OR 97223 2S 101 AB-01404 VONRENCHLER MARVIN J& MARY E 7475 SW HERMOSO WAY TIGARD,OR 97223 2S101AB-01608 WESTERN TIGARD HOLDINGS LLC 20019 SW ATEN RD BEAVERTON,OR 97007 2S101AB-01601 WHITNEY EUGENE P PATRICIA M 7340 SW HERMOSA WY TIGARD,OR 97223 Jack Biethan 11023 SW Summerfield Drive, #4 lard, OR 97224 Sue Rorman 11250 SW 82nd Avenue Tigard, OR 97223 Naomi Gallucci 11285 SW 78th Avenue Tigard, OR 97223 Michael Trigoboff 7072 SW Barbara Lane Tigard, OR 97223 Dieter Jacobs 7775 SW Spruce Street Tigard, OR 97223 Alexander Craghead 12205 SW Hall Boulevard Tigard, OR 97223-6210 David Chapman 9840 SW Landau Place Tigard, OR 97223 Nathan and Ann Murdock PO Box 231265 Tigard, OR 97281 Brad Spring 7555 SW Spruce Street Tigard, OR 97223 CITY OF TIGARD - EAST CIT SUBCOMMITTEE (i:\curpin\setup\labels\CIT East.doc) UPDATED: April 18, 2002 Exhibit One Vicinity/Zoning Map , . 1 :,. L 7545 SW Zoning Hermoso Way \ \ ,,, 4 '- Taxlots.shp i Zoning.shp Central Commercial jGeneral Commercial ( Neighborhood Commercial j _ i Office Commercial CG I ELMHURST Agricultural or Forestry C 1 Industrial Area j -Heavy Industrial �� 1! j I-- Light Industrial I Mixed Use Industrial j j Mutti Family(low density) sii_ Mutti Family EE PIIIII Mufti Family ty) Mixed Use(low density) Mixed Use(low density) Ell Mixed Use(high density) Public Facilities Parks&Open Spaces M lJ C 2 Rural Residential or Future Urban Single Family(lowest density) \ \ _ � I I Single Family(low-medium density) • Single Family(medium density) f Single Family(medium-high density -52.;\ Single Family(high density) Single Family(highest density) III. 1 U, 2 v Alt eetsshp 'L) /� 'Freeways �— MinoraStreets TM\ �^ Freeways s �,v\ __�_ : Wash heels I •-•--------- ------ ___ ■ HI. ..._____ .,.. . Iv N li I IL \ 1 stewart CG - title of oregon \\ \ GONZAGA mall / \ �N J/'" \ Wr E 0.05 0 0.05 0.1 Miles S City of Tigard> Business > Municip-' 'ode>Title 18: Community Developr- -'t Code Page 1 of 2 -* Home I Search ale ti City of f Tigard Oregon irch i..earch for ; City Hall Business Community Police Library Help 9 Oct 2002 Related Items Tigard Municipal Code - Title 18: Community Development Code Current Planning Home > Business > Municipal Code > Title 18: Community Development Code Division GIS On-Line Maps Title 18: Community Development Code Quick Links :. Home City Charter Bid Advertisements :.City Council Agenda Title 18: Table of Contents Update posted: 5/02 Cityscape Newsletter Construction in Tigard Title 18: Index Events/Meetings Calendar 18.100 Introduction :.Forms 18.100 Legislative Notes. Job Opportunities 18.110 Introduction. New to Tigard? 18.120 Definitions. I. News 18.130 Use Classifications. :. Parks in Tigard :.Tigard Municipal Code 18.200 Administrative Procedures :.Volunteer Opportunities 18.200 Legislative Notes. :.Water Division 18.210 General Administrative Provisions. 18.220 Zoning Administration. 18.230 Enforcement. iine Services .. As Online Maps 18.300 Land Use Decisions :.Library Catalog- 18.300 Legislative Notes. WILInet 18.310 Summary of Land Use Permits. :.Utility Payments 18.320 Annexations. :.Town Partner 18.330 Conditional Use. Update posted: 7/01 :.Vendor Registration 18.340 Director's Interpretations. 18.350 Planned Developments. Update posted: 6/02 18.360 Site Development Review. Update posted: 5/02 18.370 Variances and Adjustments. Update posted: 5/02 18.380 Zoning Map and Text Amendments. 18.385 Miscellaneous Permits. 18.390 Decision-Making Procedures. Update posted: 11/01 18.400 Land Division 18.400 Legislative Notes. 18.410 Lot Line Adjustments. 18.420 Land Partitions. Update posted: 4/01 18.430 Subdivisions. 18.500 Zoning Districts 18.500 Legislative Notes. 18.510 Residential Zoning Districts. Update posted: 6/02 18.520 Commercial Zoning Districts. Update posted: 5/02 18.530 Industrial Zoning Districts. Update posted: 11/01 18.600 Community Plan Area Standards 18.600 Legislative Notes. Update posted: 4/01 18.610 Tigard Town Center. (Optional) 18.620 Tigard Triangle Design Standards. Update posted: 4/01 18.630 Washington Square Regional Center Design Standards. New Chapter: 5/02 City of Tigard >Business> Municip' -ode >Title 18: Community Developr * Code Page 2 of 2 18.640 _..nam Quarry Design Standards. New L. _. ter: 5/02 18.700 Specific Development Standards 18.700 Legislative Notes. • 18.705 Access, Egress and Circulation. 18.710 Accessory Residential Units. 18.715 Density Computations. 18.720 Design Compatibility Standards. 18.725 Environmental Performance Standards. 18.730 Exceptions to Development Standards. 18.740 Historic Overlay. 18.742 Home Occupations. 18.745 Landscaping and Screening. Update posted: 6/02 18.750 Manufactured/Mobile Home Regulations. 18.755 Mixed Solid Waste and Recyclable Storage. 18.760 Nonconforming Situations. Update posted: 5/02 18.765 Off-Street Parking and Loading Requirements. Update posted: 5/02 18.775 Sensitive Lands. Update posted: 6/02 18.780 Signs. Update posted: 4/02 18.785 Temporary Uses. Update posted: 4/01 18.790 Tree Removal. Update posted: 6/02 18.795 Visual Clearance Areas. 18.797 Water Resources (WR) Overlay District. (Has been incorporated with Chapter 18.775: 6/02) 18.798 Wireless Communication Facilities. 18.800 Street and Utility Improvement Standards 18.800 Legislative Notes 18.810 Street and Utility Improvement Standards a Printer Friendly Version (IE 5.0+ or Netscape 6.1+ only) Questions, comments, suggestions? Fill out the feedback form. Legal Disclaimer Privacy Policy City of Tigard, 13125 SW Hall Blvd,Tigard, OR 97223 (503) 6394171 Chapter 18.520 COMMERCIAL ZONING DISTRICTS Sections: 18.520.010 Purpose 18320.020 List of Zoning Districts 18520.030 Uses 18.520.040 Development Standards 18520.050 Special Limitations on Uses 18.520.060 Additional Development and Design Guidelines 18320.010 Purpose A. Provide range of commercial services for City residents. One of the major purposes of the regulations governing development in commercial zoning districts is to ensure that a full range of retail and office uses are available throughout the City so that residents can fulfill all or most of their needs within easy driving and, ideally within easy walking and/or biking distance of their homes. The location of land within each commercial district must be carefully selected and design and development standards created to minimize the potential adverse impacts of commercial activity on established residential areas. At the same time, it is important to create more opportunities for mixed use, including residential, commercial and institutional activities, in new and re-developing commercial areas. B. Facilitate economic goals. Another purpose of these regulations is to ensure that there is a full range of economic activities and job opportunities within the City limits, in compliance with the economic goals of the City of Tigard Comprehensive Plan. 18.520.020 List of Zoning Districts A. C-N: Neighborhood Commercial District. The C-N zoning district is designed to provide convenience goods and services within a small cluster of stores adjacent to residential neighborhoods. Convenience goods and services are those which are purchased frequently, i.e., at least weekly; for which comparison buying is not required; and which can be sustained in a limited trade area. Such uses include convenience markets, personal services and repair shops. A limited number of other uses, including but not limited to restaurants, gas stations, medical centers, religious institutions, transit-related park-and-ride lots and facilities with drive-up windows,are permitted conditionally. B. C-C: Community Commercial District. The C-C zoning district is designed to provide convenience shopping facilities which meet the regular needs of nearby residential neighborhoods. With a service area of about 1.5 miles, such commercial centers typically range in size from 30,000 - 100,000 gross square feet on sites ranging from 2 - 8 acres. Separated from other commercially-zoned areas by at least one-half mile, community commercial centers are intended to serve several residential neighborhoods, ideally at the intersection of two or more major collector streets or at the intersection of an arterial and collector street. Housing is permitted on or above the second floor of commercial structures at a density not to exceed 12 units/net acre, e.g.,the maximum density permitted in the R- 12 zone. A limited number of other uses, including but not limited to car washes, gas stations, religious institutions, and transit-related park-and-ride lots,are permitted conditionally. In addition to mandatory site development review, design and development standards in the C-C zone have been adopted to insure that developments will be well-integrated, attractively landscaped, and pedestrian- friendly. Commercial Zoning Districts 18.520-1 SE/Code Update: 04/02 C. C-G: General Commercial District. The C-G zoning district is designed to accommodate a full range of retail, office and civic uses with a City-wide and even regional trade area. Except where non- conforming,residential uses are limited to single-family residences which are located on the same site as a permitted use. A wide range of uses,including but not limited to adult entertainment,automotive equipment repair and storage, mini-warehouses, utilities, heliports, medical centers, major event entertainment,and gasoline stations, are permitted conditionally. D. C-P: Professional/Administrative Commercial District. The C-P zoning district is designed to accommodate civic and business/professional services and compatible support services, e.g., convenience retail and personal services,restaurants,in close proximity to residential areas and major transportation facilities. Within the Tigard Triangle and Bull Mountain Road District,residential uses at a minimum density of 32 units/net acre, i.e., equivalent to the R-40 zoning district, are permitted in conjunction with a commercial development. Heliports, medical centers, religious institutions and utilities are permitted conditionally. Developments in the C-P zoning district are intended to serve as a buffer between residential areas and more-intensive commercial and industrial areas. E. CBD: Central Business District. The CBD zoning district is designed to provide a concentrated central business district, centered on the City's historic downtown,including a mix of civic,retail and office uses. Single-family attached housing, at a maximum density of 12 units/net acre, equivalent of the R-12 zoning district, and multi-family housing at a minimum density of 32 units/acre, equivalent to the R-40 zoning district, are permitted outright. A wide range of uses, including but not limited to adult entertainment, utilities, facilities with drive-up windows, medical centers, major event entertainment and gasoline stations,are permitted conditionally. F. MUE: Mixed-Use Employment. The MUE zoning district is designed to apply to a majority of the land within the Tigard Triangle, a regional mixed-use employment district bounded by Pacific Highway (Hwy. 99), Highway 217 and I-5. This zoning district permits a wide range of uses including major retail goods and services, business/professional offices, civic uses and housing; the latter includes multi-family housing at a maximum density of 25 units/acre, equivalent to the R-25 zoning district. A wide range of uses, including but not limited to community recreation facilities, religious institutions, medical centers, schools, utilities and transit-related park-and-ride lots, are permitted conditionally. Although it is recognized that the automobile will accommodate the vast majority of trips to and within the Triangle, it is still important to 1) support alternative modes of transportation to the greatest extent possible; and 2) encourage a mix of uses to facilitate infra-district pedestrian and transit trips even for those who drive. The zone may be applied elsewhere in the City through the legislative process. G. MUE-1 and MUE-2: Mixed Use Employment Districts. The MUE-1 and 2 zoning district is designed to apply to areas where employment uses such as office,research and development and light manufacturing are concentrated. Commercial and retail support uses are allowed but are limited, and residential uses are permitted which are compatible with employment character of the area. Lincoln Center is an example of an area designated MUE-1, the high density mixed use employment district. The Nimbus area is an example of an area designated MUE-2 requiring more moderate densities. H. MUC: Mixed Use Commercial District. The MUC zoning district includes land around the Washington Square Mall and land immediately west of Highway 217. Primary uses permitted include office buildings, retail, and service uses. Also permitted are mixed-use developments and housing at densities of 50 unites per acre. Larger buildings are encouraged in this area with parking under,behind or to the sides of buildings. Commercial Zoning Districts 18.520-2 SE/Code Update: 04/02 I. MUC-1: Mixed Use Commercial— 1. The MUC-1 zoning district, which is designed to apply to that portion of the Durham Quarry site within the City of Tigard, is a mixed-use commercial district bounded by 72i1 Avenue,Findlay Street and the Tigard,Tualatin and Durham city limits. This site is the subject of an intergovernmental agreement between the cities of Tigard and Tualatin. Pursuant to that agreement the City of Tualatin shall furnish all planning, building and associated development review/permit services for the property. This zoning district is intended to mirror the City of Tualatin's Mixed Use Commercial Overlay District (TDC, Chapter 57). It permits a wide range of uses including commercial lodging, general retail, offices and housing; the latter includes multi- family housing at a minimum density of 25 units/acre and a maximum of 50 units/acre. Additional uses, including but not limited to major event entertainment and motor vehicle retail fuel sales, are permitted conditionally. In addition to the standards of this chapter, development within this zone is subject to the standards of Chapter 18.640. J. MUR: Mixed Use Residential Districts. The MUR zoning district is designed to apply to predominantly residential areas where mixed-uses are permitted when compatible with the residential use. A high density (MUR-1) and moderate density (MUR-2) designation is available within the MUR zoning district. 18.520.030 Uses A. Types of uses. For the purposes of this chapter,there are four kinds of use: 1. A permitted (P) use is a use which is permitted outright, but subject to all of the applicable provisions of this title. If a use is not listed as a permitted use, it may be held to be a similar unlisted use under the provisions of Section 18.130.030; 2. A restricted (R)use is permitted outright providing it is in compliance with special requirements, exceptions or restrictions; 3. A conditional (C) use is a use the approval of which is at the discretion of the Hearings Officer. The approval process and criteria are set forth in Chapter 18.370. If a use is not listed as a conditional use, it may be held to be a similar unlisted use under the provisions of Section 18.130.030; 4. A prohibited(N)use is one which is not permitted in a zoning district under any circumstances. B. Use table. A list of permitted, limited, conditional and prohibited uses in commercial zones is presented in Table 18.520.1. Commercial Zoning Districts 18.520-3 SE/Code Update: 04/02 C. Accessory structures. 1. Accessory structures are permitted in all commercial zones providing the site is still in compliance with all development standards, including but not limited to setbacks, height, lot coverage and landscaping requirements, of the base zone. All accessory structures shall comply with all requirements of the Uniform Building Code. All accessory structures except those less than 120 square feet in size require a building permit. 2. All freestanding and detached towers, antennas, wind-generating devices and TV receiving dishes, except as otherwise regulated by Wireless Communication Facilities (Chapter 18.798), shall have setbacks equal to or greater than the height of the proposed structure. Suitable protective anti-climb fencing and a landscaped planting screen, in accordance with Chapter 18.745,Landscaping and Screening, shall be provided and maintained around these structures and accessory attachments. Commercial Zoning Districts 18.520-4 SE/Code Update: 04/02 TABLE 18.520.1 USE TABLE: COMMERCIAL ZONES USE CATEGORY C-N"1 C-C151 C-G C-P CBD MUE1291 MUC-1 MUC1201 MUE MUR 1 and 21291 1 and 21201 RESIDENTIAL Household Living N R161 R1111 R1131 R(171 R1211 0261 P p p Group Living N N C N P N C R1291/C R1291/C R1291/C Transitional Housing N N C N C N C C C C Home Occupation R121 R1 21 R[2] R1�1 R1 21 R1�1 P R1�1 R1 21 R1�1 HOUSING TYPES Single Units,Attached N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A R1301 R1301 P Singel Units,detached N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A R1301 R1301 R1391 Accessory Units N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A R1311 R1311 R1311 Duplexes N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A R1301 R1301 P Multi-family Units N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A P P P Manufactured Units N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N N N Mobile Ilome Parks,Subdivisions N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N N N CIVIC(INSTITUTIONAL) Basic Utilities C N N C C C C C1321 C1321 C1321 Colleges N N N N N C C C C C Community Recreation N P N N P C N P C C Cultural Institutions P P P P P P P P P N Day Care P P P P P P P P P P/C1331 Emergency Services P P P P P P P P P N Medical Centers C N C C C C C C C C Postal Service P P P P P P P P P N Public Support Facilities P P P P P P P P P P Religious Institutions C C P C P P C P P C Schools N N N N N C C C C C Social/Fratemal Clubs/Lodges C C P P P P P P P C COMMERCIAL Commercial Lodging N N P 81141 P P P P , P N Eating and Drinking Establishments C P P R11s1 P P _ P P P R134/351 Commercial Zoning Districts 18.520-5 SE/Code Update: 04/02 USE CATEGORY C-N111 C-C151 C-G C-P CBD MUE1261 MUC-1 MUC1281 MUE MUR 1 and 21281 1 and 21281 Enterta iru nent-Oriented - Major Event Entertainment N N C N C N C C N N - Outdoor Entertainment N N P R1151 P N N C N N - Indoor Entertainment P P P P P P P P P N - Adult Entertainment N N C N C N N C N N General Retail - Sales-Oriented P P171 P R1161 P R1221 R1251 P Rlxz] 8134/351 - Personal Services P p P p p R1221 R1251 P R1221 R134/351 - Repair-Oriented P P P N P R1221 R1251 81221 021 N - Bulk Sales N N P N N R1221 R1251 R1221 R1221 N - Outdoor Sales N N P N N N N N N N - Animal-Related N N N N N P P N N N Motor Vehicle Related - Motor Vehicle Sales/Rental N N P/C1121 N C N N R1241 R1241 N - Motor Vehicle Servicing/Repair N C181 P/C1721 N R11 s1 R1221 R1251 N N N - Vehicle Fuel Sales C C C N C N C C C N Office P R191 P P P P P P P R134/351 Self-Service Storage N N C N N N N N N N Non-Accessory Parking C C P P P P P P P N INDUSTRIAL Industrial Services N N N N N N N N N N Manufacturing and Production - Light Industrial N N N N N R1231 N N R1231 N - General Industrial N N N N N N N N N N - I leavy Industrial N N N N N N N N N N Railroad Yards N N N N N N N N N N Research and Development N N N N N R1241 R1241 N R1731 N Warehouse/Freight Movement N N N N N R1241 N N R1231241 N Waste-Related N N N N N N N N N N Wholesale Sales N N N N C N N N R123/241 N OTHER Agriculture/I-Iorticulture N N N N N N N Cemeteries N N N N N N N Commercial Zoning Districts 18.520-6 SE/Code Update: 04/02 USE CATEGORY C-Nltl C-C151 C-G C-P CBD MUE1201 MUC-1 MUC1281 MUE MUR 1 and 2128] 1 and 21281 Detention Facilities N N C N C N N Heliports N N C C C N N Mining N N N N N N N Wireless Communication Facilities P/R131 P/R131 -p/R131 We] P/R131 p&131 P/RIn Rail Lines/Utility Corridors P P P P P P P Other C141 C11°1 NA NA C1191 NA NA P=Permitted R=Restricted C=Conditional Use N=Not Permitted [1] All permitted and conditional uses subject to special development standards contained in Section 18.520.050.A. [2] Permitted subject to requirements Chapter 18.742. [3] See Chapter 18.798 Wireless Communication Facilities,requirements for permitted and restricted facilities. [4] Uses operating before 7:00 AM and/or after 10:00 PM are conditional uses. [5] All permitted,limited and conditional uses must meet special development standards in Section18.520.050.B. [6] Residential units permitted by right,as a mixed use in conjunction with a commercial development,on or above the second floor of the structure,at densities not to exceed 12 units/net acre. [7] Limited to 10,000 gross square feet in size,except retail food and beverage outlets,which are limited to 40,000 gross square feet or less. [8] Limited to motor vehicle cleaning only. [9] When combined in single structure,each separate establishment shall not exceed 5,000 gross square feet. [10] Uses operating before 6:00 AM and/or after 11:00 PM;or drive-up windows are conditional uses. [11] A single-family unit providing that it is located on the same site with a permitted or conditional use in and is occupied exclusively by a caretaker or superintendent of the permitted or conditional use. Multi-family housing is permitted as part of a PD,subject to Chapter 18.350. [12] Cleaning,sales and repair of motor vehicles and light equipment is permitted outright;sales and rental of heavy vehicles and farm equipment and/or storage of recreational vehicles and boats permitted conditionally. [13] Multi-family residential units,developed at R-40 standards,as a mixed-use in conjunction with commercial development on or above the second floor of the structure,only in the C-P District within the Tigard Triangle and Bull Mountain Road district. [14] Restaurant permitted with restriction in size in conjunction with and on the same parcel as a commercial lodging use. [15] As accessory to offices or other permitted uses,the total space devoted to a combination of retail sales and eating/drinking establishments may not exceed more than 20%of the entire square footage within the development complex. [16] May not exceed 10%of the total square footage within an office complex. [17] Single-family attached and multi-family residential units,developed at R-40 standards,except the area bounded by Fanno Creek,Hall Boulevard,O'Mara,Ash Avenue and Hill Street,within which property zoned for CBD development which shall be designated R-12 PD and shall be developed as planned developments in conformance with the R-12 District standards. 118] Motor vehicle cleaning only. [19] Drive-up windows permitted conditionally. [20] All permitted and conditional uses subject to special development standards contained in Section18.520.050.C. [21] Multi-family residential,at 25 units/gross acre,allowed outright. Pre-existing detached single-family dwellings are permitted outright. [22] New Retail and sales uses may not exceed 60,000 gross leasable area per building within the Washington Square Regional Center or Tigard Triangle except for those areas zoned C-G at the time the MUE zoning district was adopted in the Tigard Triangle. [23] All activities associated with this use,except employee and customer parking,shall be contained within buildings. [24] Permitted as accessory to a permitted use as long as this use is contained within the same building as the permitted usc,and does not exceed the floor area of the permitted use. [25] Permitted provided the use is no larger then 60,000 square feet of gross floor area per building or business. [26] Household living limited to single units,attached,and multi-family including but not limited to apartments,attached condominiums,townhouses and rowhouses at a minimum density of 25 dwelling units per acre and a maximum density of 50 dwelling units per acre. [27] Wireless only as attached to structure within height limit,see Chapter 18.798. (28] All Permitted and Conditional Uses subject to special development standards contained in 18.630 [29] Group living with five or fewer residents permitted by right,group living with six or more residents permitted as conditional use. [30] Pre-existing housing units permitted. Conversion of pre-existing housing units to other uses is subject to the requirements of Chapter 18.630. Commercial Zoning Districts 18.520-7 SE/Code Update: 04/02 131] Permitted for pre-existing housing units,subject to requirements Chapter 18.710. [321 Except water,storm and sanitary sewers,which arc allowed by right. [33] In-home day care which meets all state requirements permitted by right;freestanding day care centers which meet all state requirements permitted conditionally. [34] This use is allowed only in mixed-use developments in the Washington Square Regional Center. Commercial uses shall occupy no more than 50%of the total floor area within the mixed-use development,and shall be permitted only when minimum residential densities are met. [351 The maximum building footprint size permitted for any building occupied entirely by a commercial use or uses shall be 7,500 square feet. Commercial Zoning Districts 18.520-8 SE/Code Update: 04/02 18.520.040 Development Standards A. Compliance required. All development must comply with: 1. All of the applicable development standards contained in the underlying zoning district, except where the applicant has obtained variances or adjustments in accordance with Chapters 18.310 and 18.320; 2. All other applicable standards and requirements contained in this title. B. Development standards. Development standards in commercial zoning districts are contained in Table 18.520.2 below: Commercial Zoning Districts 18.520-9 SE/Code Update: 04/02 TABLE 18.520.2 COMMERCIAL DEVELOPMENT STANDARDS CBD MUE RESIDENTIAL R-25 STANDARD C-N C-Ctrl C-G C-P CBD R-40 R-12 C-G MF DU* MUC—1 MUC MUE 1 MUE 2 MUR 1 MUR 2 171081 (171151 [17511) [171[181 (171151 Minimum Lot Size 5,000 sq ft 5,000 sq ft None 6,000 sq ft None None None None - None None None None None None Detached unit 1,480 sq ft Boarding,lodging, - 6,100 sq fi -rooming house Minimum Lot Width 50 ft 50 ft 50 ft 50 ft None None None 50 ft None None None None None Nonc None Minimum Setbacks -Front yard 20 ft 0/20 ft 1101 0 ft" 0 ft 1111 0/30 ft[121 20 ft 20 ft Oft" 20 ft V 0 ftprl 0 ft" 0 111211 0 fi(2al 10 el Side facing street on 20 ft 0/30 R 1121 20 ft 20 ft 20 ft V 0 ftt`r1 0111211 0 fl[2'1 5 ft" 10 ft" -comer&through lots 01 -Side yard 0/20 ft(s1 0/20 ft(s1 0/20 ft 1st 0/20 ft[`l 0/30 ft 1121 10 ft 1141 10 ft 1141 0/20 ft 101 10 ft V 0 ft[1r1[2°1 0 0251 0 ft[2°l 0 ft(1°l 0 ft[2°1 -Side or rear yard abutting - - - - - - - - 30 ft p - - - - - more restrictive zoning district -Rear yard 0/20 ft(61 0/20 ft 151 0/20 ft fill 0/20 ft[ill 0/30 ft[121 20 ft 1141 20 ft[151 0/20 ft ill 20 ft V 0 ft1lsl2ol 0 0201 0 ft[20] 0 ft[20122] 0 ft[20][:z1 -Distance between front - - - - - 20 ft 20 ft - 20 ft p N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A of garage&property line abutting a public or private street. Minimum Building Height N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A 2 stories 2 stories None 2 stories None Maximum Building height 35 ft 35 ft 45 ft 45 ft 80 ft["1 60 ft 60 ft 45 ft 45 ft 70 ft 200 ft 200 ft 60 ft 75 ft 45 ft Maximum Site Coverage 121 85% 80% 85% 85% 85% 80% 80% 85% 80%[16] 90% 85% 85% 85% 80% 80% Minimum Landscape 15% 20% 15% 15% 15% 20% 20%1151 15% 20% 10% 15% 15% 15% 20% 20% Requirement Minimum FAR[21 N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A 1.25 1.25 0.6 0.6 0.3 Minimum Residential N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A 50 50 25 50 25 Density 1412101 unit/acre unit/acre unit/acre unit/acre unit/acre Maximum Residential N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A None None 50 None 50 Density t411'14 unit/acre unit/acre V=See 18.640.050.B [1) The provisions of Chapter 18.795(Vision Clearance)must be satisfied. [2] Includes all buildings and impervious surfaces. [3] Applies to all non-residential building development and mixed use development which includes a residential component. In mixed use development,residential floor area is included in the calculations of floor area ratio to determine conformance with minimum FAR. Commercial Zoning Districts 18.520-10 SE/Code Update: 04/02 [4] Notwithstanding the requirements of Section 18.715.020,minimum and maximum density shall be determined for residential only projects using the number of residential units per acre shown in the above table. The provisions for density transfer described in Section 18.715.030.B apply,using the minimum and maximum density shown in the above table. Any mixed-use or commercial only development does not have a minimum density requirement. [5] For purposes of determining floor area ratio and residential densities,the net development area shall be uses to establish the lot area,determined per Section 18.715.020.A. [6] Adjustments to minimum density in the Washington Square Regional center area subject to the standards set forth in Section 18.630.020.E. [7] The maximum density requirements for developments that include or abut designated Water Resources Overlay district Riparian setbacks per Chapter 18.797 are described in Section 18.630.020.D. [8) No setback shall he required except 20 feet shall be required where the zone abuts a residential zoning district. [9] See Section 18.520.050.B for site and building design standards. [10] No front yard setback shall be required,except a 20 foot front yard setback shall apply within 50 feet of a residential district. [11] There shall be no minimum front yard setback requirement;however,conditions in Chapters 18.745 and 18.795 must be met. [12] There are no setback requirements,except 30 feet where a commercial use within a district abuts a residential zoning district [13] The maximum height of any building in the CBD zone within 100 feet of any residential zoning district shall not exceed 40 feet [14] Where the side or rear yard of attached or multiple-family dwellings abut a more restrictive zoning district,such setbacks shall not be less than 35 feet. [15] Landscaped areas on existing developed property in the CBD shall be retained. Buffeting and screening requirements set forth in Chapter 18.745 shall be met for existing and new development. [16] Lot coverage includes all buildings and impervious surfaces. [17] Modifications to dimensional and minimum density requirements for developments that include or abut designated Water Resources Overlay District Riparian setbacks per Chapter 18.797 are described in Section 18.630.040.F. 118] The requirements contained in the Buffer Matrices in Tables 18.745.1 and 18.745.2 shall be used in calculating widths of buffering/screening and required improvements to be installed between proposed uses in the MUC,MUE and MUR zones within the Washington Square Regional Center(WSRC)and abutting zoning districts not included within the WSRC,or zoning districts within the.WSRC which are not mixed- use. For MUC and MUE zones,the requirements for Commercial Zones apply. For MUR zones,the requirements for the Neighborhood Commercial Zone apply. [19] For Commercial and Mixed-use developments,the maximum front and street side yard setback is 10 feet. For Residential only developments,the maximum front and street side yard setback is 20 feet. [20] Side and rear yard setbacks shall be 20 feet when the zone abuts residential districts shown in Section 18.510.020 except R-25 and R-40. [21] The maximum setback is 20 feet. [22] The maximum setback is 10 feet. *Multiple-family dwelling unit C-N -Neighborhood Commercial District MUC 1—Mixed Use Commercial C-C -Community Commercial District MUC —Mixed Use Commercial C-G -General Commercial District MUE 1—Mixed Use Employment/High Density C-P -Professional/Administrative Office Commercial MUE 2—Mixed Use Employment/Medium Density CBD-Central Business District MUR 1—Mixed Use Residential/High Density MUR 2—Mixed Use Residential/Medium Density Commercial Zoning Districts 18.520-11 SE/Code Update: 04/02 18.520.050 Special Limitations on Uses A. In the C-N zone. Special limitations in the C-N zoning district are as follows: 1. The use shall be conducted wholly within an enclosed structure, except as allowed in Section 3 below; 2. No use shall have a gross floor area greater than 4,000 square feet; 3. Accessory open-air sales, display and/or storage shall be permitted for horticultural and food merchandise only and shall constitute no more than 5% of the gross building floor area of any individual establishment;and 4. Uses operating before 7:00 AM and after 10:00 PM shall be subject to the conditional use provisions, as governed in Chapter 18.330. B. In the C-C zone. Special limitations in the C-C zoning district are as follows: 1. Such centers shall be developed preferably as a single unit and occupy only one quadrant of the intersection at which it is located; 2. The use shall be conducted wholly within an enclosed structure, except for outside play areas for children's day care facilities,and as allowed in Sections 3 and 4 below; 3. No use shall have a gross floor area greater than 5,000 square feet except for the retail sales of food and beverages,when the maximum floor area shall not exceed 40,000 gross square feet,and all other sales-oriented retail,where the maximum floor area shall not exceed 10,000 gross square feet; 4. Accessory open-air sales, display and/or storage shall be permitted for horticultural and food merchandising uses only shall constitute no more than 5%of the gross building floor area of any individual establishment; 5. Accessory open-air dining or drinking areas shall be permitted for approved eating and drinking establishments or retail food stores only. Outside dining areas are not permitted within 200 feet of any developed residential area. Public or private sidewalk areas around dining areas may not be reduced to less than five feet of clear walkway;and 6. Uses operating before 6:00 AM and/or after 11:00 PM and drive-up windows are subject to conditional use provisions, as governed by Section 18.330. C. In the MUE zone. Special limitations in the MUE zoning district are as follows: 1. The maximum floor area ratio (FAR) for all commercial and industrial use types and mixed-use developments shall not exceed 0.40. Residential use types, including transient lodging, shall not be subject to this requirement; 2. On lots greater than three acres, general retail sales uses are limited to 30,000 square feet of gross leasable area plus one additional square foot of gross leasable area of general retail sales use for each additional four square feet of non-general retail sales use. Commercial Zoning Districts 18.520-12 SE/Code Update: 04/02 D. In the MUC-1 zone. In addition to the standards of this Chapter, development in the MUC-1 zone is subject to Chapter 18.640 and an Intergovernmental Agreement between the cities of Tigard and Tualatin. E. In the MUC. MUE-1. MUE-2. MUR-1 and MUR-2 zones. Within the Washington Square Regional Center,the standards of Chapter 18.630 shall also apply. 18.520.060 Additional Development and Design Guidelines A. Development/desisn guidelines in the C-C zone. 1. The following design guidelines are strongly encouraged for developments within the C-C district. Conditions of approval of the development plan may include,but are not limited to, any of the site and building design guidelines deemed appropriate to be mandatory. a. Building design guidelines: (1) The design of buildings within a community commercial development should incorporate elements such as special architectural details, distinctive color schemes, special art and other features, which are sensitive to and enhance the surrounding area and serve to distinguish the complex from other retail complexes in the city; (2) All buildings within a multi-building complex should achieve a unity of design through the use of similar architectural elements, such as roof form, exterior building materials, colors and window pattern; (3) Individual buildings should incorporate similar design elements, such as surface materials, color, roof treatment, windows and doors, on all sides of the building to achieve a unity of design. The sides of a building which face toward a public street should include public entrances to the building and windows to provide visual access to the activity within the building. The sides of a building which face toward an adjoining property, but not toward a public street, should include elements such as windows, doors, color, texture, landscaping or wall treatment to provide visual interest and prevent the development of a long continuous blank wall. b. General site design guidelines: Loading areas should not be located on the side of a building which faces toward a residential use. Loading areas, if located between the building and the street, should be oriented away from the street and should be screened to minimize views of the loading area from the street and sidewalk. 2. Design standards: The following mandatory design standards apply within the community conunercial district: a. Internal Walkways. (1) Walkways, eight feet minimum width, shall be provided from the public sidewalk or right-of-way to the building(s). At a minimum, walkways shall be located to connect focus points of pedestrian activity such as transit stops and street crossings to the major building entry points; Commercial Zoning Districts 18.520-13 SE/Code Update: 04/02 (2) Walkways, five feet minimum width, shall be provided to connect with walkways or potential walkway locations on adjoining properties to create an integrated internal walkway system along the desired lines of pedestrian travel. The width of the walkway should be commensurate with the anticipated level of pedestrian activity along the connecting walkway. (a) Walkways shall be provided along the full length of the building on any side which provides building access to the public or where public parking is available, to provide safe and comfortable pedestrian access to the building; (b) On the sides of the building which provide public access into the building, the walkway should be wide enough to allow for sidewalk seating areas as well as pedestrian travel. Weather protection of the walkway should be provided at a minimum at the entrance area and,if appropriate,along the entire walkway. (3) Walkway surfaces for walkways crossing parking areas shall be designed to be visually distinguishable from driving surfaces through the use of durable, low-maintenance surface materials such as pavers,bricks or scored concrete to enhance pedestrian safety and comfort. b. Other site development standards: (1) All lighting fixtures shall incorporate cut-off shields to prevent the spillover of light to adjoining properties; (2) Mechanical equipment, if located on the building, shall be located within the roof form of the building or enclosed within a screening structure, the design of which is consistent with the design of the building; (3) Mechanical equipment,not located on the building, shall be screened from views from the public street, sidewalk and properties outside the district with a durable, solid wall or fence, or an evergreen hedge or a combination of the above; (4) All refuse and recycling containers within the district shall be contained within structures enclosed on all four sides and which are at least as high as the tallest container within the structure; (5) Bicycle racks shall be provided on site. Facilities for a minimum of ten bicycles shall be provided for developments having 100 or fewer parking stalls, notwithstanding Section 18.765.050. For each 100 additional stalls, facilities for five additional bicycles shall be provided. Bicycle parking areas shall not be located within parking aisles, landscape areas or pedestrian ways. It is strongly encouraged that bicycle parking areas be covered; (6) The site development plan shall incorporate a special feature at the corner of the site. A special corner feature can be a landscape feature, seasonal color planting area, sculpture or water feature. The feature shall provide a visual landmark and some amount of seating area; Commercial Zoning Districts 18.520-14 SE/Code Update: 04/02 (7) Parking areas shall be designed to minimize conflicts between pedestrian and vehicular movements. Parking area landscaping shall be used to define and separate parking, access and pedestrian areas within parking lots; (8) The Iandscape design for the site shall include plantings which emphasize the major points of pedestrian and vehicular access to and within the site; (9) Site features such as fences, walls, refuse and recycling facility enclosures, and light fixtures shall be designed to be consistent with the scale and architectural design of the primary structure(s). Such site features shall be designed and located to contribute to the pedestrian environment of the site development; (10) In multiple building complexes, buildings shall be located to facilitate safe and comfortable pedestrian movement between buildings. On sites which are adjacent to other properties within the community commercial district, building location shall be chosen to facilitate pedestrian and vehicular connections to buildings on those adjacent properties. Consideration should be given to locating buildings closer to the public street with entrances to the buildings from the public sidewalk, with no intervening parking or driving area. Corner locations are particularly appropriate for this treatment; (11) Opportunities shall be found for safe, convenient, and pleasant pedestrian connections to existing or proposed transit facilities. Where needed, shelters and layover areas for transit vehicles shall be incorporated into the site development. c. Sign design standards:All signage shall be an integral part of the architectural design. B. Interim requirements in the CBD zone. 1. In the absence of an adopted design plan, the following issues, under Subsection B.1.c. must be addressed for new developments as necessary to serve the use and provide for projected public facility needs of the area,pursuant to Chapter 18.810 as determined by the Director. a. The City may attach conditions to any development within an action area prior to adoption of the design plan to achieve the following objectives: (1) The development shall address transit usage by residents, employees and customers if the site is within 1/4 mile of a public transit line or transit stop. Specific items to be addressed are as follows: (a) Orientation of buildings and facilities toward transit services to provide for direct pedestrian access into the building(s)from transit lines or stops; (b) Minimizing transit/auto conflicts by providing direct pedestrian access into the buildings with limited crossings in automobile circulation/parking areas. If pedestrian access crosses automobile circulation/parking areas,paths shall be marked for pedestrians; (c) Encouraging transit-supportive users by limiting automobile support services to collector and arterial streets; and Commercial Zoning Districts 18.520-15 SE/Code Update: 04/02 (d) Avoiding the creation of small scattered parking areas by allowing adjacent developments to use shared surface parking, parking structures, or under-structure parking; (2) The development shall facilitate pedestrian/bicycle circulation if the site is located on a street with designated bike paths or adjacent to a designated greenway/open space/park. Specific items to be addressed are as follows: (a) Provision of efficient, convenient and continuous pedestrian and bicycle transit circulation systems, linking developments by requiring dedication and construction of pedestrian and bike paths identified in the comprehensive plan. If direct connections cannot be made,require that funds in the amount of the construction cost be deposited into an account for the purpose of constructing paths; (b) Separation of auto and truck circulation activities from pedestrian areas; (c) Encouraging pedestrian-oriented design by requiring pedestrian walkways and street level windows along all sides with public access into the building; (d) Provision of bicycle parking as required under Subsection 18.765.050;and (e) Ensure adequate outdoor lighting by lighting pedestrian walkways and auto circulation areas. (3) Coordination of development within the action area. Specific items to be addressed are as follows: (a) Continuity and/or compatibility of landscaping, circulation, access, public facilities and other improvements. Allow required landscaping areas to be grouped together. Regulate shared access where appropriate. Prohibit lighting which shines on adjacent property; (b) Siting and orientation of land use which considers surrounding land use, or an adopted plan. Screen loading areas and refuse dumpsters from view. Screen commercial and industrial use from single-family and residential through landscaping; and (c) Provision of frontage roads or shared access where feasible. 2. Existing nonconforming industrial structures at the following locations may continue to be utilized for I-P Industrial uses after the nonconforming use limit of six months: Map 2S 1 2AA tax lot 4700,Map 2S 1 2AC tax lot 100 and 202, Map 2S 1 2AD tax lot 1203,Map 2S 1 2DB tax lot 100,and Map 2S 1 2DA tax lot 300. C. Washington Square Regional Center. See Chapter 18.630 for additional development and design guidelines.• Commercial Zoning Districts 18.520-16 SE/Code Update: 04/02 Exhibit Two Existing Conditions/Demolition Plan CO v / GENERAL & DEMOLITION NOTES C) REMOVE EXISTING BUILDING. FOUNDATION, ETC. p,� .1 DISPOSE OF PER APPLICABLE CODES. "I / p o v) N 1 O REMOVE EXISTING AC DRIVEWAY. DISPOSE OF PER APPUCABLE CODES. t„ -Q°o il i O3 REMOVE EXISTING TREE. "V ® COORDINATE WITH GAS COMPANY FOR SERVICE p RELOCATION AND ABANDONMENT. ~ O I ® REMOVE EXISTING FENCE M 1 = n 0 I ® REMOVE EXISTING SEPTIC TANK. PUMP OUT AND t" m° ` l''' �E �j r N IE#� fj fJ DECOMMISSION PRIOR TO REMOVAL. "V o a F" 1 �' .,-q AIJ.114:Frty(i _ { '( 1 0 INSTALL SILT FENCE PRIOR TO DEMOLITION WORK £ dC O! i" IEj 1 'Rat.-. RR �`-. r r' --- © INSTALL 20' X50% Br THICK GRAVEL CONSTRUCTION ' I ! r , �° :_-„ _ "' - ENTRANCE PRIOR TO EQUIPMENT/TRUCKS I i r °f'� - - t _ ,1 A V f pti- ;d ENTEREINC/LEAVING THE SITE. ILOATik�� <v __ ,.� rte--_ ,tT.e A% r I/.IF o, / -._ 1 "�' , ® PROTECT EXISTING TREE. MINIMIZE EXCAVATION ' � i ; ? '4- i' r�+ti. f _ fr../ - 1 AND FILL BELOW THE DRIP UNE OF TREE. °', ..\ ∎ I ris{� ' �„ .,�� / 1 ® REMOVE EXISTING SHED rrt•+�a ION �, ..1 i '� }?%A� c•'J' "g -R`Ak4R�.fG -w �x'/` r ,, , '..) '1 i 1 %I' /'III /'!'< °,'.4C 1 1 Oj PROTECT EXISTING ARBORVITAE HEDGE ? I 1 , / , . . 'f I {- ! d , a i �f -¢��1� r/p j �� ® REMOVE EXISTING RETAINING WALL. HAUL DISPOSE I 1 t $ -- r / ✓T�` t / MATERIALS OFF-SITE. I i I I f I M r.• j J .,. . I ! I 0 CONTACT PGE FOR OVERHEAD SERVICE REMOVAL I u I I ! t,,• / 1 AND ESTABLISHMENT OF TEMPORARY POWER FOR f I a, 1 J/ �I j Ii `,(,� CONSTRUCTION.ii/f 1 1 r I / r CO i ; / 1 t !,. -,/ d 1 Q N } 1 f ` , �` _ , II. i 3 1 �_ w 3 i � 1=� Y ��. � � i a __-----_ 1 t� N w �� L.p I. { m N I 1 ,, ;"Ic.K , ' i U r� 1 Z o co L�1 '-r i! r^ J , ,'r _�.. i;.ulNTef? I I 7 / CC I 7� I �_/ <f j rrhr _ , 1 FAQ If�I Ji .[ - r �• 1 `�( 1 -r i i�id I 1 j m I r I #I 1 � �' 1, � fit_ 4i : i i I _ / J / ./.; s.rE"s j pp� � to P / EiER ) i �+� i j Z } ( FR I t 1 I I i i, / ; I /� . 1' �.1 j _ 11 jj i I , / 1 �' �.E` 1 " I 1 / t �s ►� f 1 / i -ti I I 1 it I / ? I ,, ' i I! / 1 )1 /� i J �' r 1 W CO I REV. 1 DATE I BY O 1tf ` ..'� .1 A W ! 11 { < i A' t S 1 I I .........LL • 1 r FI I :s s•4...ry .y 1 " !'hkft .;kK ic't*if _''.;:y,-,__'•_�.•�,._ _ 1�3(}I ,t I : :.. • ... - 0 41 i ; PROJECT N0. �t 2003—PJ45 ) II . ! 1 , DATE 5/0,3 I 1I 1 1 DESIGNED C. HAT-TITER a f I I r ENGINEER R. 517H I ., / WARNING CHECKED 1 I (!( 0 t/2 t SHEET TITLE PLAN VIEW r / IF INS EXISTING SITE do Sca& t'—t0• hz. NOT MEASURE I" DEMO PLAN S o 10 20 THEN DEMME IS P NOT TO SCALE SHEET NUMBER i SCALE IN FEET DESIGN REVIEW >i Exhibit Three Site Plan i /�1 " *s.. /. . . . . .n... e . . . . ... y 4 1 s _ 15 4 k I gl, i l ,10..9„„i.r . ,= .„.,.,____ il _ !NI," i ii 4 4 1 4 ra mmmlig NT / 4 ii: I mimic I •m7,sms _.____Nomp.„,„„wirii kille e �� � —ter--"- ----- -_��� aifI� �� g \-----------rr--______---_.. ••■•-•r•••••••ird,W.A.r... ' r�r� Rff`�� •��• ' ' ' ISO WAY +1 y ■ H , :''I 1 a 2 NEW DIVIDE WILDING lrOrib MINUT�"IAN ROR YANTIS DESI GNS ANAL A,�r� fi �� "° 24495 N.E.Hwy.240 1 s ' MONO s r ig ,T si11�,p em; NEWBERG,OREGON 97132 M A t`•;1 1'�I OI�QI 1132 0► MOW 6204203 203 (503)538-0672 R MOW 031/444n Exhibit Four Grading and Utility Plans brnete Egg eud E Spa Drainage Plan Minuteman Press Facility 7475 Hermonso Way Tigard, Oregon Prepared For : Gray Purcell Contractors. ,0,0O PROF P.O.Box 3616 Portland, Oregon 97208 , ��G , 3 ¢ Prepared By : Willamette Engineering and ' Earth Sciences •RE e•9. P.O. Box 1139 04,_ • 18 19 A Dallas, Oregon 97338 RT . c' EXPIRES 06/30/04 Date : June 3, 2003 Robert J. Slyh,P.E. Principal Attachments: Figure 1, Site Location Map Civil Design Drawings NRCS Data Calculations INTRODUCTION This report provides analysis pertaining to the treatment and quantity of the storm water runoff from the proposed development of the Minuteman Press facility in Tigard, Oregon (Site Location Map, Figure 1). The analysis and design were performed in conformance with the Clean Water Services Design and Construction Standards Manual. The proposed on-site storm drainage system includes sheet flow and pipes to convey the storm water runoff from the project site to the storm water basin. The runoff from the project site will be discharged into a water quality extended dry basin on the west of the project site. The outflow from the basin will discharge into a natural drainage that discharges into wetland area to the west of the project site, and ultimately to Fanno Creek. P.O. Box 1139, Dallas,OR 97338 (503)623-0304 Storm Water Drainage Report-03 1rjs: I Minuteman Press - 7475 Hemonso - Drainage Plan June 5, 2003 Page 2 The calculations include a hydrologic analysis to determine the pre-development and post development peak storm water runoff quantities, storm water detention requirements, and water quality treatment facility requirements. SITE CHARACTERISTICS The project site is located on the west of the Hermonso Way in Tigard, Oregon. The total area within the property boundaries is approximately 0.43 acres. (Drawing C-1). Based on the Soil Survey of Washington County, the primary soil type on the site is Aloha which is a silty loam soil and is categorized in hydrologic soil group C. The proposed site development will include approximately 0.43 acres, and will consist of an office structure,parking areas,and driveway(Drawing C-3). HYDROLOGIC ANALYSIS METHODOLOGY Design precipitation for the 25 and 100 year storms is based on the Clean Water Services design methodology. The site soil characteristics.are an indication of the potential for runoff and infiltration of rainfall during these specified events storms. Curve Numbers (CN) are established based upon these soil characteristics and the existing and proposed land use of the project site. Curve Numbers are a measure of the runoff and infiltration potential of rainfall as developed by the Natural Resources Conservation Service. The CN for the pre-developed site calculations was determined to be 78 for the pervious areas and to be 100 for the impervious areas. The time of concentration (Tc) has also been determined for pre-developed and developed conditions. Under pre-developed conditions, the Tc is based upon sheet flow and shallow concentrated flow under guidelines in the Clean Water Services Manual. Using this method the Tc was determined to be 32 minutes for the existing site conditions. For developed conditions, the Tc is based on developed characteristics and travel time to the storm water treatment swale. The Tc for the developed conditions was calculated at 13 minutes (See Santa Barbara Urban Hydrograph Summary and Time of Concentration Calculations). All hydrographs were generated using the Santa Barbara Urban Hydrograph (SBUH), Type IA Method. The hydrographs were produced using King County's Hydrograph Routing Computer Program (HYD). Input included precipitation for the particular storm event, curve number (CN) for pervious and impervious areas and time of concentration (Tc). The SBUH method was used 5g9ateenioi9 aaad Eanaa Seiegea Storm Water Drainage Report-03/rjs: 1 Minuteman Press - 7475 Hemonso -Drainage Plan June 5,2003 Page 3 with the site characteristics to determine the pre-development and post-development hydrographs for the 25 year and 100 year storm events. Design of the detention and conveyance systems was also performed based on these hydrographs. Hydrographs for the site and storm water system are presented in the Site Hydrographs figure in the calculation attachment. The maximum pre-development storm water flow rates for the 25 year storm event was 0.15 cubic feet per second (cfs). The maximum post development storm water flow rates for the 25 and 100 year storm events were 0.30 cfs and 0.36 cfs, respectively. WATER QUALITY ANALYSIS: Water quality treatment of the storm water runoff will be provided by a combination swale and pond located on the west of the site. The design storm used for the water quality analysis is an event totaling 0.36 inches of rainfall falling in 4 hours with an average storm return period of 96 hours. The required swale capacity is 356 cubic feet. The swale is essentially flat, but will include a perforated collection pipe at a 1.0 percent slope beneath the drain rock (Drawing C-3 and C-5, Details 4, 5, 6). The calculated flow velocity through the rock and pipe is based on the slope between the up-gradient end of the swale at 177, and the elevation of the water quality orifice, located at elevation 176.75. STORM WATER DETENTION The storm water detention basin was sized based on maintaining the maximum discharge from the site equal to or less than the pre-development site storm water flow rate of 0.15 cfs, based on the 25 year, 24 hour storm. The basin sizing calculation was completed using the routing option of program HYD. The maximum storage required for the 25 year storm was approximately 240 cubic feet. The detention pond crest elevation for the 25 year storm was 177.0 feet. A 2.35 inch diameter orifice, or equivalent area, will be installed at elevation 177.25 to restrict the maximum out flow to 0.15 cfs, combined with the water quality orifice. The emergency overflow will be at elevation 177.50. The overflow will be required to pass a total flow of 0.36 cfs. �fii4 scene EKyureaiiag aged Ecvaa Sccegecea Storm Water Drainage Report-03/rjs: 1 sliii ;,4,-,6- 0-, -.....,,v.- 1,,i,s0 ..a....-.r.....-,- ...-,.,... -,,,, ne, PI r i '`"- r....;,N r' - 11. ,... . .,-,..... .....3.3.,,- --- „ -, - -xi 14 1 C3�C. i? 4,5 _ Ki ♦ ;r,. ''' w1 i ku '. ti, f:."l r .. ti a •, ,, ...„11,... .-; ,fir.. • - f • or I If I ll \ 11‘,. r., , , ,..., . i ir.%sic. 'WI •urrt AIL; Ntitips::\lig% . ' 'trlik"Ilk lbk\,,a4tigT s it* ' , _Vat t 1, \, % 1111` 41* it ....;": r`sue \ Site Location �. .1 I ,�,- ,°ill \ II t 1 �� . Ft • 1 4 ' . ar { R { A.. Y itV,T, - p A � - Mt t } , i Gtr a �. 8' W �a Y row *� N1t cx ' .. r�" 'fit - t � , ! , ' ° fie ■ 1�`R T . 11;ZP- '. '''t pit 'War 4 grili tt L; 1 ' of.,, fr, i IET ir ,"-T V 1 1 1100_ 1 11‘1..' ki :Li- - r lir .494tirL '''' — — ."*.1 Iiii klk,eV" r " r''' ; .wry',';:r, d. ' , . 1 ,. . .k .t4,: Minute Man Press WeatMette 7545 SW Hermanso, Tigard, Oregon s,exl«g&Eared Seturua Site Location Map PO Box 1139 Dallas,Oregon (503)623-0304 Fax(503)623-2434 SCALE 1000 ft. = 1 in. I !Figure 1 Minuteman Press - 7475 nemonso -Drainage Plan June 5,2003 Page 4 CIVIL DESIGN DRAWINGS 11111/ 111 M NEW OFFICE BUILDING . ''',::' ':.,..-4,-,:i'l',........,:t.,..;::-..,,,- .. - ...' s .. . .„, a 5 r4 W m c7,_4.--f,,.2.„.,...,..,... f...„--. , ..,. ._.:.....:.„........ -...-... .2:...., ,::::...,....".. :..., .,,,.. . ... .., . .. MINUTEMAN PRESS . . ,...,... . . , PAVEMENT SL�=C7XW9 GENERAL NOTES ` R 1. ALL PUBLIC IMPROVEMENTS SHALL BE W ACCORDANCE WITH CURRENT CITY OF TGARD REFER TO GEOTECNNICAL REPORT LISTED BLOW `" 1.'}n r� r: 'W't> X STANDARD SPECIFICATIONS,DETAILS AND DRAWINGS. rT ' ; ♦ o 2. ALL MATERIAL SUPPLER(S)SHALL SUBMIT TO THE ENGINEER PROOF OF MATERIALS(S) TESTED GRADING SPE—C/HCATIO '. t'� „rA;ti e•■ "� /',4• vary p, o W ACCORDANCE WITH THE ABOVE SPECRCATONS AND SHALL CERTIFY THAT AU MATERIAL ' DELIVERED TO THE 97E MEET OR EXCEED THE SPECIFICATIONS PRIOR TO DELIVERY OF MATERIAL 1. ALL GRADING SHALL BE DONE IN ACCORDANCE$7H RE RELL'MWFNDAR04S AND SPEdFlCATIONS h � t _ E m SET FORTH IN THE SOULS AND GEOLOGIC REPORTS ENTITLED"Ceotechnlcd Enginserig Design Study, � t ' Lt _ up /0 7E AL ANY MATE O NOT CfR1F7ED BY T£SUPPLIER SHALL BE REA101fD FRW THE JOB SITE AT NO o c •. _P ✓ ,s,, j°` rG ACDIT(NAC COST TI ilf OWNER. &EARN Prey Office D:MAY 2003 Flan RAYtP, CELL PREPARED BY.' WLLAAETIE ENCNFFRMG „,,,\N o R EARN SCIENCES DATED:NAY 10(11 FOR GRAY Pl.RC1rLL INC . .: _ .,v . � . m uoi 3 THE CONTRACTOR AND/OR THE SUB-CONTRACTOR SHALL HAVE A MINIMUM OF ONE SET OF ''• vl;.`. n y •++ .rdx� 1 O APPROVED CLMIS1RUCRO4 PLANS CN THE Joe SITE AT ALL TINES DURING 111E CONS7RUCTON PHASES 2 ALL COMPACTED ELL MATERIAL UNDER STRUCTURES OR N PARKING AREAS 7O ESTABLISH PRO'1R .Gvr,� °t s t• i• a U SUBGRADE SHALL BE PACED AM COMPACTED UNDER THE 08SERVAT W OF A SOILS ENGINEER. e(irocnnnFAa - 6)°'v 4. BEFORE EXCAVATING FOR TIES CONTRACT, CONTRACTOR SHALL VERIFY LOCATION OF UNDERGROUND - r i, T4 S7J M:I• FACILIDES AND COORDINATE HIS WORK WITH THE UTILITY COMPANY REPRESENTATIVES(CALL 48 A'����p� ;} 'RQp'. HOURS PRIOR TO EXCAVATION). THE EXISTENCE AND LOCATION OF ANY UNDERGROUND FACILITY BENCHMARK R �.tl yy." y :, _r4 �t l �,'C h c, - - PIPES OR STRUCTURES SHOWN ON THESE PLANS HAVE BEEN OBTAINED FROM AVAILABLE RECORDS ONLY AND MAY NOT REFLECT ALL DOSING UTLITES LOCATIONS OF ALL EXISTING UTILITIES SHALL ELEVATION BASED ON TIGARD VERfCIL DATUM BENCH MARK No.275 f p 4 '4 •/PT BE CONFIRMED BY FIELD MEASUREMENTS BY CTXNIRAC1Ot PRIOR RI CONSTRUCTION OF NEW MOR1C ° { ,, k 7.. r C st .� x�cL-T ,, itt• "'p'E ?. --- l'..roiMill,111 DESCIPIKN: ELEVATION..21389 _ -�.. — _, t:. W; -� r I AZT7S,jMAb r�� -" r� , UIU>Y NO7 7CA11OM CENTER (503)246-6899 � �j��� /�� ,Ut-J.+,y, E, �` t j1.., t w.;-' (q -o CLOW WATER SERVICES(SEWER.&WATER) (503)648-8621 LEGAL L/Ei Y r `^ f4! NS NEST&GAS (500)220-2415 LOT 21 OF HERYO90 PARK SUBDIW90N. TIC.ARD OREGON '1.'":.....•4‘.40, '� i,,. ma! � NW NATURAL ) (800)220-2415 : -i• ,8:t".tai,`t∎•t `•, '`.;{. i '" 5T i . ..f �. .. �u iv-,a.>w..oa PL£(QEC718C) (BCD)544-1793 a I,//�f'')'�(/1 "'•-- L tti •AT&T CABS SERVICES(CABLE 71� • (503)605-4840 [�/lIK7/NM�,i T 'yf v i "1 `•�.. � ; � o,.,,e ;:a, , a_-- _ c _r \ jj S CONTRACTOR SHALL MAKE EXPLORATION EXCAVATCNS AND LOCATE DOSING UNDERGROUND FACUIIES.ENGWNEER COMPASS ENl.NEDI EG A.6 Ae Iii-'," a#T ,") ( - _' .. OF WORK SHALL BE NOTIFIED OF ANY DISCREPANCIES BETWEEN TfSE PLANS AND ACTUAL FlE2D CONOTIONS 6564 SE LIKE ROAD .� .. SUFFlOENRY AHEAD OF CYXV57RUCDQJ TO PERMIT REWSIONS ID PLANS F REV9CN5 ARE NECESSARY BECAUSE �Y ''�` l��F WLVAUKE OREGON 97222 r� �',' 39y (t I i,4 �,t : I , OF ACTUAL LOCATION CF EXISTING FACILITIES 503-653-9093 (1 DATE(F TWO MAY 2003 N Y tin 'L,...e 'te ( I ) l'''''''''.-,'"•';'... ^ t n' 6. LOCATRW AND ELEVATION OF IMPROVEMENTS TO BE MET BY WORE(TO 8E DONE SHALL BE CONFIRMED BY ' i ° "' s -_ t s CONTRACTOR PRIOR TO CONSTRUCTION OF NEW WORK. r ",,,. �i . - 1 .,. 'Y - ENC�NEERSNOIF �•a `�` .�.�� �.�' ` ^5 rx `>, �__ 7. DOSING MIRES SHOWN HEREON ARE FRO AVNLA9E RECORDS NFODLADKN.OLNIRAC1OP IS TO NOIFY DECREER CF WORK OF ANY CONEUCTS OR ANY ONO?UTU7FS DNCOUVTERED PRIOR TO PROCEEDING WTH DONS7RLC71DN. UNAUTHORIZED CHANGES & USES v�i/r('�T•.y�yd p a CONTRACTOR IS REOUFID TO TALE PREC.ILRIONARY AE.ASVRES TO PROTECT RE UTILITY UNES SHOWN HEREON CAUTION.• The engineer preparing these pions will not be responsible for, or V'��A AND ANY OTHER EXISTING LEES NOT OF RECORD OR NOT SHOWN ON REM`PLANS liable fa, unauthorized changes to or uses of these pions. All changes to the SCALE 1 = 2000 FEET Z CO "" ADJACENT plans must be fn wrfting and must be approved by the preparer of these plans. Q �`` 9. WHERE TRENCHES ARE ACENT TO FUTURE BUILDING SEES SOILS REPORTS SNAIL BE SUBMITTED TO THE BENDY Cie WORE(BY A CUALFFD SOU ENGINEER MACH CERNFY TAT lREFX,71 BACKFAI WAS COVFACIED AS CON7RACTORS AL 1 J ILI °ERECTED BY THE SOILS ENGINEER IN ACCORDANCE WTH RE CN-97E EARTHWORK S'EC1FlCADONS CC CO 10. CONTRACTOR SHALL COORDINATE HIS WORK WITH THAT OF OVID?CONTRACTORS WORKING Constroctlon contractor agrees that in accordance with generally accepted con- Cu 1.4 O N ON RE SHE,NCLUDIVG GRADING DRAINAGE,LANDSCAPING MD IRRIGATOR. structlon practices, construction coot for if be required to assume ss/e and complete responsbillty for et site persons and the course thof is construction �'1�/�� L CON TRA��/ti/� W Z 0 co 11. ELEVATIONS ARE TO FINISHED GRADE OF IMPROVED SURFACES UNLESS OTHERWISE NOTED. of the prpubc't, hdud/ng safety of dl persons and property, that fh/s requharnerrf SITE/BLDG.L�••!( NT !V//KF shall be mode to apply continuously and not be limited to normal working hours, 0 and construction contractor further agrees to defend, indemnify and hold design C �. Q 12 NODER THE OWNER NOR THE ENGINEER OF PARK WU EAFORCE SAFETY MEASURES CR REGUADONE THE professional harmless from ony and all liability, read or alleged, in connection with GRAY PURCELL INC. CONTRACTORS LL' W W CONTRACTOR SHAH DESIGN,CYNSIRUCT,AND MNNTAN ALL SAFETY DEICES INCLUDING SHORING AND SHALL the performance or work on this project, excepting liability arising from the sole BE SOLELY RESPONSIBLE FCR CONFORMING TO ALL LOCAL,STATE AND FEDERAL SAFETY AND HEALTH negligence of design professional. 11445 SW 11EDEMAN AVENUE Q ma I STANDARDS,LAWS AND REGULAfONS I TIGARD OREGON 97223 I- Q ci T3 NOT WREST/WONG RE EWMLSI STANDARDS SET FORTH N RE APPLXABLE CODE AND NOT WITHSTANDING THE Install Silt Fence 503 639-6127 Z APPROVAL OF THESE PLANS THE FERMITTEE IS RESPONSIBLE FOR THE PREVENTION OF DAMAGE TO PRQJECT A(ANAGER: RORY ANUS W Z fn (7 ADJACENT PROPERTY.NO PERSON SHALL DtCA VATE CN lAND SO OooE TO TIE PROPERTY UNE AS TO ETDANGER C ID ANY AOJONNG PUBLIC STREET,SDEWMX,ALLEY,FOICTICN OF ANY SEWAGE DISPOSAL SYSTEM OR ANY OTHER - V 4 _ Z PUBLIC OR PRIVA IE PROPERTY BIRDER SAPPO TNG AND PROTECTING SUCH PROPERTY FROM SETTLING CRACKING Ni ER090N,SILTING SCOW,OR OTHER DAMAGE WHICH WONT RESULT FROM THE WORK DESCRIBED ON THESE N PLANS. THE PERMITIEE IS RESPON9BLE FOR CORRECTION OF IMPROVEMENTS WHICH DAMAGE nU / I - j 10 ADJACBIT PROPERTY II s FILTER FABRIC MATERIAL HUED USE STITCHED LOOS + ` tl A 41‘,,,,-f III( , ..,. 36,W�ROTS FABRIC OVER 2"x 2'POSTS ! -- • MATERIAL tt ,=1�....; _wY , 1--{ • r \ . I INDEX OF DRAWINGS n I , o •° ' h ,' ri - t. I I:, Cl COVER SHEET REV. 1 DATE BY I m 'Diehl11- 1i'fAA i!-4� `�"� ��\—� ry' ' x L I. ��/ .,� C2 EXISTING TORO & DEMO PLAN I I I 61JAXIMUM SPAONC I C3 GRADING PLAN I t I I FRONT VIEW SIDE VIEW "` 1 C4 UTILITY PLAN L NTS NTS 1 C5 SITE DETAILS PROJECT NO. 2003-PJ45 ANGLE BOTH ENDS H FILTER FABRIC C6 PUBLIC IMPROVEMENTS • FENCE TO ASSURE SOIL IS TRAPPED • NOTES• ,.Vr.r`�+y.,,v.:x•.. iI ' DATE i $�03 •R�•,;.:u,N_.�;,L` t.. t4 ••. DESIGNED( G. HAFFNER 20X50 GRA i C7 PUBLIC DETAILS ENGINEER( R. SLYH 1. BURY BOTTOM OF FLIER FABRIC 6° -. _ i r a .�_' MRITCALLY BELOW FINISHED DUDE. = - _ :�.. ■ ?ran ■ ■ - •:.:'-:_::7Ft .-.yM...•.r _i'+4.1'... 0 CHECKED L 2 22-x 2." PINE CR STEEL. "----..-.-"I',...`.•:'.-- -•-,�_:•., .v.'•••riv. .(,:;'c1 WARNING !HEIRLOOM.° 3 SIYOHED LOOPS TO BE INSTALLED � • SHHsEVVE■■T IDLE 2"x 2"POSTS DOWEL ODE CF SLOPE 0 1� WtiaT AND ATTACH 4 L10APACT ALL AREAS OF fi1ER FAt#5NC a TOP VIEW TRENCH. EROS/ON CONTROL PLAN I Ir THIS BAR DOES NOT MEASURE 1' SHEET NUMBER NIS EMI wear SCALE 1" m 20' I NEONT T�'OASSCCALE IS k SEDIAENTFaICE 1 I DESIGN REVIEW C_1 I) � a T CONSTRUCTION NOTES / Qt PAVEMENT SECTION TO 8E 2' COOT CLASS "C" BITUMINOUS `n `D N PAVEMENT OVER 12 INCHES OF 3/4' MINUS WELL GRADED '1 0 I CRUSHED GRAVEL. GRAVEL TO BE COMPACTED TO 95% OF T-180 PROCTOR. AC TO BE COMPACTED TO 92% OF MAXIMUM o ix THEORETICAL DENSITY (RICE). o O ON-SITE CURB TO BE STANDARD CURB PER CITY OF TIGARD a DETAIL NO. 125. SEE DETAIL ON SHEET C6. a PROVIDE 2' WIDE CURB OPENINGS AT 10' SPACING AS ° 0 I O SHOWN. PLACE 3'-MINUS ROCK DOWN TO SWALE BOTTOM, M N I I 2' MADE FOR EROSION PROTECTION. 1 ) ! o n r I INSTALL HANDICAP RAMP PER ADA REQUIREMENTS. ALL m ,r) _ NNE; I 4 GRADES WITHIN HANDICAP AREA MALL NOT EXCEED 2% SLOPE. q ! � - t m^ "``�i0 LP h _ SIGN AND MARK STALL PER STANDARD REQURIEMENTS. O. 9 l T 1, f`J - - h0 �� ,�4G RAr 1 1 I 05 SEE OFF-SITE PUBLIC IMPROVEMENTS ON SHEET C6. s 41) F • i f.h 1 I ©1 �-- \ f■■/ +t O7 J 1 f Ilia ' 1 a 2' " BUILDING TO 05AT LOW ENOSEE SCTURAL FOR DETAILSI I ^ n I ate •,;1, ,` �/ %, e t n; -t Q8 INSTALL SHORT WALL. SEE STRUCTURAL FOR DETAILS. ,p.•,A„SO.,OI ..i e r' 44' ,, _ i © t . I I 1 /' .1!.u ftI 1 , Q INSTALL DEEP CURB. BACKSIDE OF CURB VARES FROM 0.5' ' , v� il4 i L TO 1.5' AS S.W. CORNER OF LOT. EXTRA CURB HEIGHT 0 I �,;; r7g•23 I ! ! ; Iw( _a i i, I!If' REQUIRED TO TRANSITION UP FROM PROPERTY LINE AT 2:1. 1 , 1 I r , L L" I -'L I I I I i I �,% f - �1 !• f / X I i r I ® GRADE WATER QUALITY AND DETENTION POND SWALE LIP i FROM TOE OF ARBORVITAE'S AT 2:1 TO ELEVATION 178. © J ,� I ` 1t I GRADE DOWN AT 3:1 TO ELEVATION 177. GRADE DOWN au!1 �J_ _ I * ;` ".:-/;::/:; I L' I FROM BACKSIDE OF PARKING LOT CURB AT 3:1 TO POND ..I . Z I ' JJJ I BOTTOM AT ELEVATION 177. 3'(•EV ■ x 1 I I O INSTALL LANDSCAPE WALL TO PROTECT TREE Z CO I) } / ...:• AC.I 1 I.:II I 0/ 1 ,I ti" fr.• EL �•X Mf .1 9 •.- 1 ,:ii 7 ri 1 Q C OFFICE BUILDING ' I Ic ' _1 w • I T a13aSBntgnt :=c' ��•_ �� j 1 I © DRAIN LANDSCAPE AWAY FROM BUILDING, MIN. 5 FEET. 5 co•�. H \ !' / _ O 181+1- _ .-;-h�• i `. m a O N• i; ! ! 1st Floor 193+/_ I I: N n 4; ;t� 2 , o11 °2nd Floor 205+/- ■ ( ! i I 0 SEE DETAIL 1 ON C5 FOR DRIVEWAY VERTICAL CURVE Z u,., ! INFORMATION. V Q 0 CD h • I \ ti. + I I r ce ¢ 0 I j ® INSTALL 4' WIDE WALK WITH HANDRAIL TO SIDEWALK AS I'1' W 1 f �:. (f 1 j' I SHOWN. CONSTRUCT RETAINING WALL HEIGHT VARIES W Z P / f� '_ ' - I ' A I ( 1 FROM 9' TO 2'. SEE STRUCTURAL FOR WALL DETAILS. O ? ,\ t `'� t• I I % ; J..../c) ? jI I Z tv 1 o m: ire I I I , , , ....,....i : ! • I' I it REV. I DATE I BY ' O illinfilitm .. ,. . :;iii'I I I:1 I -•L * : 10)- �1 f i 1 i 1 I 0 ��-----. . c.a co._ Et�! • a'a';Z ! J; I I 1 imeia .6 ace-. >1 t I I l s I 1 — I — ���� �,, ;� 1 PRO,ECT NO. 2:1 FILL FROM PROPERTY LINE — !� — - ' — — �f 1 . I 2003-PJ45 0 — I 1 ,;� i DATE 1 503 6 ;, I DESIGNED 1 C.HAFFNER ENGINEER 1 R. AYH r 1 , I CHECKED PLAN VIEW 0 SHEET TILE Scale. 1' 10' ha. I I I IF THIS BAR Does GRADING PLAN ASURE 1- • 0 10 20 THEN DRS AMIC IS SHEET NUMBER NOT TO SCALE A SCALE IN FEET i DESIGN REVIEW C_3 • 1/ CONSTRUCTION NOTES , , 2 // ® INSTALL 6" GRAVITY SANITARY SEWER INSTALLED AT 1% MIN. p,� o�-°% _ N =GUN%5/8"IRON ttP 1Mfl1 / f' INVERT ELEVATION CALCULATED AT STREET MAIN IS "I o n i 'al A Yri1 0Pf PLASTIC C+v .A(F \ / r, APPROXIMATE ELEVATION OF 179.D. ELEVATION AT EAST EDGE KS 25`5'" I � OF BUILDING AT 179.40, FINISH FLOOR AT 181.0. SEE C7 & o �I C8 FOR STREET TRENCH BACKFILL AND ROADWAY PATCHING t,` 6 ill DETAILS. w!I o ` O INSTALL STORM DRAIN PIPING PER CURRENT UNIFORM PLUMBING a CODE (UPC). I o i fr c 1 i O3 INSTALL 3"--0 ROCK AT OUTFACE OF PIPE, MIN, 12 SQ. FEET, 0 1 I J 11 3-4 INCHES DEEP TO PREVENT SCOUR. & a 1 I I ij x e I 1 i I ® INSTALL FIELD INLET WITH 3" PERF PIPE PER DETAIL 5 ON 12 o . _ -- r'D 5/3" RCM kCr) NI N ' i SHEET C5. 3" PERF TO BE INSTALLED AT 0.5% GRADE /� i� 'C LOW�'L A;'.k:fns,�iTAtrt~ �� ` Q W - `�}+ ,' r. t,'LLj S f' \ I z, � 1 I I I+ Q5 COORDINATE WITH GAS COMPANY FOR SERVICE ABANDONMENT 3v »,q, '`/ I Iy AND RELOCATION.i ii ,Ncr 7/Ii ! — - ,, ' /s �� '=f © COORDINATH PGE FOR NEW SERCE CONNECN. I Q ■i ,' `_ ex � i `y l` � I tj 4O PVC UNDERGROUND CONDUIT TO POWER! I I 7 RATE M i G3'r, � ?! I VALVE P I. — SHEET C6. "s&role if I p I li/lit t , i , ; /� l I val.14 I III j X11 I 1 8 y # :it „ I I I I 1j I � � + I .lie %'Y © I w ' I ill.. ,., j , , E � ,L_ •I Y 1 1 ` go 1 • II I I Il 11 11 , 11 p H +t , f . \ I w �FFIVEL 40�x so' ...0.,y, ' , I j�II 8(.9 � a I I I 1 \ 1 � CE BUILDING . ••' iit; I ' "�; _! MW 1 I O �• :rte• I c I r I.J.. C�r y , ? J I Basement 181 +/. ' ' I ./.I }r j ' I \ � 1st Floor 193+/- p LL1 (ih1 © 2tTd Floor 205+/- I !l Z co alf.u` f; ` 3 i v a 11 If i tERri j \\�7 I • i IIt j \ , =��' i 1:: i:< I I I l i .._-.. I tr �i y�.r �� j fI I Z us 0_ ! ' j �w tf3p»__ �' gI Sir x,16I r Ilf r W M H iiii ii I I _\ ; f 1 It II I �1 I eft it 4 il I I II , ly I I , St ,/ + ! f' 1 I ( � �•� I ECG ' REV. 1 DATE , BY "9:ici), .L K�r �� q � y D$ t ! s. I I ! I! I„.„... .,.....�'- y ,,,�-gC �I ----------- yJ T 1 f i —_L. i I i 1 I I \ .` -1 �_"!y-_._..,. . „ I ' i' I PROJECT NO I, ,J �•i +� .. 1. • •„. .T:c,s R_. It. - -____- _- ��� `'' I r 2003-PJ45 . • i IDATE 1 5/0.3 I r DESIGNED G. HAFFNER _ I I ( ENGINEER, RSLYH PLAN VIEW SHEETED, I I I SHEET T11LE- ---- Scale: 1",-10• hz. unurr PLAN 0 tO 20 SHEET NUMBER S I SCALE IN FEET DESIGN REVIEW C-4 S CO .4- n n � o aA __ _ ..... 210b - -HIGH PONT-EIEV.--11,1.7.;. m R n HIGH--POINT STA-: 0+.20.6ff_ PM-.STA-_0436.1x_- -._ ..--_.- .-- -- --- -- Ri .. _o x A.0.-=_'"1-7A0.__--4_._.--._._.__._____.-...____-._-; 205 0 • 1 1700 VC 1 ' • -_._ __.I O 200 200 160--'------'-- .--_ �._._�. _-� - _ o 11 W ' _ _ _._ @ _ 1�1�__. '_ ___. ��� �_ _ LINE D N n Y} ,. _ ._ _. __ _ _- .. E__._--_'_.____�� __-.-.- —_ �. _ _ _ t. Q .. �.._..___��_ } ___.___..--.—.�..___-_ _. - _ _ _ ^-. ; r TfPI�DAOROIAN AT I ! 195 .,i- Y 3. 195 ,---.-..__�_____....__— "�f .--_.. _—.}.__._..�- •!An CO 0 __.._ ...._._ _...___` i 101•-- _--r-- CLIP I� y� L� _ �� � �_ - ._ _ -_- .-___��n R BlOa TOPSOIL O - 175. (__-..--- -_ °- KEYSTONE STANDARD 8E00 I� y e �_ .��..� .-- :_--.---_""""---"�-- .-_ .. ...-_ _ f __..__ �I As REOUIRFD a _ __.�..___. .--- -_ _ _._._ ._.___—.. _ _ DRAIN RDa( 190 _- _-._ _- .-._____.�. 100 _.___.-._-..__..�.�_—. '_._.. _.. ....... ._.. _._ .... ..... ....._._....____..-..__ VII /il _�. _,r. .,-,_ ,.}_ __� __�.__._._.� OEOTEXTIIF FABRIC filitk4.'Ll S , t14 DATUM SLBV SIOE'RN-K/PARN IMO / - - - - - - re..00 A e"POW.DRAIN PIPE (t I ,_ m m ✓lam It-o �' 185 - ..-. - ... .__....__.....� ._. 185 m - LEVELING PM r- :> NOM.THCK.-e• ✓� NATIVE� � 3� COMPACTED 10 85X OF MAXIMUM • __....._ 0+00 04-23 0+50 0t73 1+00 Ink.ha.SI 101 180 0+75 OF40 0+25 0100 Hole TO PREVENT T TOP SOIL DRAIN nON A GK IL UNITS. DRIVEWAY PROFILE 0 TYPICAL SECTION 2 LANDSCAPE WALL DETAIL 40 Scale, 1.-10' Hz. Scale 1•-10' Hz. (.� Scale NTS Scale: 1-=5' Vt. Scale: 1"=10' Vt. rr�� V Z 0 a %D }• ewer Rock W a 2-5l4"River tun. J (Round NITH1N STREET OUTSMDE STREE7 RK;KI-OF-IWY 5 .- T fan o AS APPROVED BY OTT EHCMIEER` OC co STANDARD CURB :mug !ffi5T/RFACNC>a BE YIN.3 7/Y QASS•C" a O N CNI 4' TREATMENT AREA ..1 ASPHALT OR YATO4 E7057W0 m NINCME ER IS CREATE' COALI'ACTED TD RIX SEE PAVEMENT: -Vf ' A �..,• of MAX DENSITY RICE 1 O 2 SECTION DETAIL ' .��I.�. �� �, .A :1 2 1 am EA7anNG 00ST — Y— , y < DEPTH I MaLTIng Tap Sail SECDON EJOST.AC. O 3;7 „��' VARIES 3:1 !..._; L<stmerK.Aru. __ J RESURFACING 1 O U- W W IA.,rnurr L' 2'� '�` _--<.1: ' ;-',.49----- M J 5.0er. h- VJ•levie *i r mid'iI pe -•.I MIME MN. 'n ^ 2 tl 4J. G in I- JUTE MATTING PLANTING RECOMMENDATIONS ¢ 6 'M1 C 1 CLASS A r PERF PIPE Treatment Area Planting Rats _ 3 INCHES MIN. OF 2-3/4" RIVER ROCK •,�'V ° fI /,c TED TO Smolt Fruited Bull Rush @ 1'-2'OC plugs V o �``F �.-- MAX• Slough Sedge L 1'-2'OC plugs AverOgc CLASS 8 GRANULAR t i • DENSITY AS OS 5-6 loots WHEAL (COMPACTED ID .` i 1 Spreading Rush S. l'-2'OC plugs per square foot OEEHXITT `/ '2 'a OF MAX POND OPTLET DETAIL Gammon Rush 1'-2'OC plugs AASHTO T-99 I Scale: 1" = 2 HZ & VT Mid slope Area .' Cg Common Rush 1'-2'OC Average "TI Slough Sedge @ 1'-2'OC plug f square food I , < .-. . `., .V /i•�7 Red Osier Dogwood @ 3'-4.OC 6'pots r ; REV. I DATE I BY Pacific Ninebark @ 9'OC 8'tall PPE ZONE DETENTION POND CIRCULAR WIER Oregon Ash @ 6'OC 6'-8'tall .�i I 0/2 1 ���� I I 1 MATER QUALITY ORIFICE �..'s C 1 _ I ��■ TREATMENT AREA PLANTING 6 REDOING — I I ;; r : RIVER ROCK Scale: NTS C5 I ___L 4:4 _ •_ I I•V. .•yam .?PER. PERF PIPE• I PROJECT NO. hB' PVC 0 ,: 4. s, 314,-0 c PPE 2003-PJ45 PIPE ZONE [.•i 'r MATERIAL GATE H 5/03 1,,,,I;ii.4';'.' o NOTES DESIGNED I C. HAFFNER 2'-O B" 2 CLASS C ASPHALT 2. THISWTRENCH BACKFR1 RE�E APPLES TO AU 1 2 EMl1L5TFiED AsPNALi pt EWAL CHECKED, R. $L TH 12" 3/4"-O CRUSHED GRAVE SHEET TITLE COMPACTED SUBGRADE UTILITY TRENCH DETAIL 8 PARS SHEET NUMBER POND OUTLET DETAIL i VEMENT SECTION Q Scale: 1" z 2' HZ&VT E Scale: 1' - 2'H2 k VT ('� Scale: , = r HZ & VT p DESIGN REVIEW v'.5 Ill - __ s' / 190 , -- „\� c. 4 . in._•,, . p C N \ ! CURB JOINT v o ..I,. I - .'LA \ ,� .,•.�^ al..._..--I ;\ IN '' r 5•MN. i SEE NOTE 5 ROW W •YV` v 2 II A 191. ice' 1]• .0 "r� �� O � .. .w�O ..a-.:.,,,. H-B=R-R- 8-11-11=11-• w o -„=,,_ - � �� � i� � �' ! --�`�� COMPACTED SUBORA➢E 7 2" 3/4•-0•BASEROCK p K _ _ - - "• �____,4. .. ,: 1'' * Z SIDEWALK ADJACENT TO CURB N en 1 �=--- ' '�° -• __ _ _ o on F ROW O - - - y - �.► f- Vv a� _ s__._.__._..__..,,gl._-._..___.--;a-..-_. _...... --.__- I-. � . STA.O+OS. 9.B1'RT.0 ROAD ;r. �54.•I[Y7 - __.._tr3 - 6 51 -- _ _. j _ _ t_ _ -i:.t .110111L1�"I�"B un1�„ u _ o STA.1+80.77 STA.1+55.771+50 1100 STA. +30.20 a 0+00 '' - ,,�p 9.8t RT.() 16.31' RT. @ 16.314 RT. I 1• 2.OF 3/4'-D'BASEROCK `1.W' 1(', ( I .. i COMPACTED SUBGRAOE Aliti I . 1, h =-;` ! r NOTES SIDEWALK AWAY FROM CURB `- a t., �' 0.00 RT. vU - --____._....__._._. INI '�_ 1. CONCRETE SHALL BE 3000 P.S.I. AFTER 28 DAYS.6 SACK MIX.SLUMP RANGE OF 1-1/2'TO 3'. _.�„._ _ ..-=_ Cll. -- :-:--- $ITE PLAN 1 2 PANELS TO 5 fEET LONG. - 3. EXPANSION JOINTS TO BE PLACED AT SIDES OF DRIVEWAY APPROACHES. Scale; 1"=10' HZ Cfi UTILITY VAULTS,WHEELCHAIR RAMPS,A AT SPACING NOT TO EXCEED 45 FEET. - + -- f _ 4. FOR SIDEWALK ADJACENT TO THE CURB AND POURED AT THE SAME TIME AS THE - -- - -- -- - -- -- CURB,THE JOINT BETWEEN THEM SHALL BE A TROWELED JOINT WITH A MIN. 1/2-RADIUS. S SIDEWALK SHALL HAVE A MIWMUM THICKNESS OF 6 INCHES IF MOUNTABLE ..._._-_.__ CURB IS USED CR IF SIDEWALK IS INTENDED AS PORTION OF DRIVEWAY. I m I OTHERWISE SIDEWALK SHALL HAVE A MINIMUM THICKNESS OF 4 INCHES. co m 6. DRAIN BLOCKOUTS M CURBS SHALL BE EXTENDED TO BACK OF SIDEWALK WITH 3•DIAMETER 4 --'- T PLASTIC PIPE AT 2X SLOPE. CONTRACTION JOINT TO BE PLACED OVER PIPE. ? 1 a 1 q !194 ammo we ND SCALE Z !�ACUT111 P.OVUM- i { o 4(e 0 1 :,..1 1 1 hii,a loamc A.,1Ix CONCRETE Q v! }} F ow Ka_ m ? W t L`I [1 1 O IA _ 1 v W ' I COW w OC7� •1P ST ALK I ZQ J M 5. = '' _ __.__. x 193 w o , EXISTING COIIFRIME z n T N o -.__.____ _ O o PROFILE a w o --- a, m CL O N ^ I N 2 NEW FLOWLINE GUTTER GRADE PROFILE o 1 v1 m TW" -----.- 1 1 W _ + Cr N (ADD 0.5' FOR TOP OF CURB) < °e ----------'- n m K5 - _- _ r 4 SSA!_.._ _ 192 R V '- ~I 3/4' a�� ------ 1 I ;.':. _EDGE ---- 1 € ,■ ----�--- -0.737E { 1 S 6. -.'_ � DRAINAGE BLOCKOW D cc .-._._.._ ._.._.-..�._e.. . . �..._ - ........-»__.,.k.__.. ___..�..__•__...- .-.�_...._.p_...�_ ...�_.__..�.__..-}..___- t91 -/ 3 LD. PLASTIC O Z_ ! I •..k.... ....:,.. PIPE W/COUPLING , ' i I • - 6' 10 I- 1+50 1+00 .... 0+50 0+00 a 0 �'• P O CURB & GUTTER PROFILE 2 Scale: 1"=10`HL C6 I�-9`'-'� GENERAL NOTES: Scale: I-=I' Vt. O DEDICATE 5' X 125' STRIP OF LAND TO CITY OF TIGARD TO REVISE EXISTING RIGHT OF WAY FROM 50' TO 60' WIDTH. Qg RELOCATE EXISTING WATER SERVICE PER CITY STANDARDS. NOTES` O INSTALL 125' OF CURB AND GUTTER PER CITY OF TIGARD REV. 1 DATE I BY STANDARD DETAIL NO. 126. ® I I INSTALL A NEW 3/4" DOUBLE CHECK ASSEMBLY BEHIND NEW 1. TRAVERSE EXPANSION JOINTS TO BE PROVIDED AT EACH POINT OF TANGENCY RIGHT OF WAY PER CITY OF TIGARD STANDARD DETAIL NO. 530. OF THE CURB&AT OTHER LOCATIONS AS REQUIRED TO UNIT THE SPACING I I O TRANSITION NEW CURB AND GUTTER WITH CITY OF TIGARD TO A MAXIMUM OF 20 FT. I 3 STANDARD CURB IN APPROXIMATELY 25 FEET. DAYLIGHT GUTTER I GRADE AT 0.3% TO EXISTING CURB. 2. TRAVERSE EXPANSION MATERIAL TO BE PRE-MOILED NON-EXTRUDED MATERIAL I INSTALL A NEW 3/4` IRRIGATION DOUBLE CHECK ASSEMBLY WITH A MINUMUM THICKNESS OF 1/Y. I 1 BEHIND NEW RIGHT OF WAY PER CITY OF TIGARD STANDARD O SAWCUT 184 L.F. AS SHOWN. REMOVE EXISTING PAVEMENT AND DETAIL NO 531, 3. TRAVERSE CONTRACTION JOINTS TO BE SPACED NOT MORE THAN 10 FEET APART 1 I WIDEN ROADWAY TO NEW CURB ALIGNMENT. NEW 3/4`CRUSHED WITH A DEPTH OF AT LEAST ONE FOURTH OF THE CROSS SECTIONAL AREA. I I GRAVEL AND ODOT CLASS "C" ASPHALTIC CONCRETE TO MATCH ® TRENCH BACKFILL PER CITY OF TIGARD STANDARD DETAIL NO. 180. 4. CONCRETE BREAKING STRENGTH TO BE 3000 PS AFTER 28 DAYS. EXISTING ROADWAY SECTION. SUBGRADE COMPACTED TO 95% OF PROJECT NO ASTM D-1557. 5. DRAINAGE ACCESS THROUGH NEW CURBS SHALL BE PLACED A IAN. OF 2 FEET AND MAX. OF 3 FEET FROM PROPERTY LINES. 2003-PJ45 O CONNECT NEW 6" PVC SANITARY TO EXISTING LATERAL. USE INSERT-A-TEE OR PVC GASKET SADDLE. PROPOSED SANITARY DATE I 5/03 LATERAL CONNECTION AT 179.0. NEW LATERAL AT 1%PER UPC. DEBGNEDI C. HAFFNER APPROXIMATE DEPTH OF TRENCH AT 13 FEET. ENGINEER' R. SLYH © NOT USED CHECKED 1 SHEET TITLE 7 INSTALL STANDARD DRIVEWAY PER CITY OF TIGARD DETAIL NO. •^p+6^ NO ScuE PUBLIC O 143 - MODIFIED DRIVEWAY. ®oom.ocv.m Aaleow' 01p S IMPROVMENTS q O1°IW° STANDARD CURB °a Na SHEET NUMBER ® INSTALL STANDARD SIDEWALK PER CITY OF TIGARD DETAIL NO. am�w IMP ,M�,u4 1 25 MY k 120. PLANTER STRIP TO BE 7' BETWEEN FACE OF CURB AND +Ke•••A• _ _ r-6 5 FACE OF SIDEWALK. SIDEWALK WIDTH TO BE 5' FEET. DESIGN REVIEW O MI a MI M n O 0, I OUTSIDE OF WITHIN E m PAVEMENT PAVEMENT I, a, DRAINAGE B.00KQUT EXISTING PAVEMENT DIG OUT REPAIR SAW CUT OR GRINDING = �Jr "I.'•:iii:%±•�1�l!�..'�w O 1 3"ID. PLASTIC +� t 'n I. 5• PIPE W/COUPUNG \ J J 1"BATTER - 18'CAST IRON 910 BOX �� -*"..?/ t 4 ROAD I I.6 1'R( - - VAdA WATER METR 4` THICK CONCRETE L=N����� M s,.., .rte .•�, 12` PAD(SEE NOTE 4)— PLAN M 6" �y. .A •• • E. •..•.pe OS•0...0: HAND TAMP BAOFILL EIER BOX :r•A .AMAX- AROUND TOP SECTION 8"MIN. • ..•!.. '. ... s0�0,� ;.,A8 0:00 ,.°°� AGGREGATE BASEROCK M Y MAX. DOUBLE CHECK o •J .. - '- e• . - �II 1-UNION EACH SCE l& I c•BASE COURSE—"" _I VALVE ASSEMBLY �• — — COMPACTED SUBGRADE '- 00 0 6"ASTM 3034 PVC �,!III I -- .�: i/ .;�•\\r/\//\\4�\ -- \�/\\r/�I m o 1. FOR USE ALONG MEDIANS,GUTTERS MAY BE REDUCED WITH PRIOR LOCAL STREETS: � a.\\ //. A,' / W O APPROVAL FROM NE OTT ENGINEER. I £W AC - 6" CLASS"C"ASPHALTIC CONCRETE, I (SEE DETAIL NO. 505)EXTENSOR 14 8.I': \\` . 1 2. CONCRETE TO HAVE A BREAKING STRENGTH CF 3000 P.S.I. AFTER 28 DAYS AB - 4" (1-1/2"—01 AGGREGATE BASEROCK c •AI:(• 6" 3. EXPANSION JOINTS: • !WATER ML-lER I Par A. TO BE FRONDED AC - 8"CLASS"C"ASPHALTIC CONCRETE %•���� �r�� �� 1 J AT EACH PONT CF TANGENCY OF THE CURB. " 'I �2)AT EACH COL)JOINT. MINOR COLLECTOR STREETS: 'I" I CRUSHED ROCK BAStki. � � 3)AT EACH SIDE OF INLET STRUCTURES. 1= / 4)AT EACH ENO OF DRIVEWAYS. AC- 7"ASPHALTIC CONCRETE, �IIII#III� ELEVATION 5)AT LOCATIONS NECESSARY TO LIMIT SPACING TO 45 FEET. AB- 4"(1-1/Y— 0")AGGREGATE BASERO I< I I II ce!*� 9. MATERIAL TO BE PRE-MOLDED. ASPHALT IMPREGNATED.NON EXTRUDING. OR �..�. -. LOATH A THICKNESS OF 1/2 INCH. AC- 9"CLASS"C"ASPHALTIC CONCRETE •O�p�p;�� ���p( BOX SPECIFICATIONS I,.—As a.» 4. CONTRACTION JOINTS: NOTES: ��� \e DEVICE SIZE Box TYPE MAJOR COLLECTOR STREETS 1)VALVE BOX NOT TO REST _ 3/4"- 1" BROOKS/1419 SERIES OR EQUAL A. SPADING TO BE NOT MORE THAN 15 FEET. CN OPERATING ASSEMBLY. I 1 1/2" -2" CARSON 17300 P15L OR EQUAL JOINT B. THE DEPTH OF THE JOT SHALL BE AT LEAST 1 1/2 INCHES. AC- 9" CLASS"C"ASPHALTIC CONCRETE, 2)OPERATOR EXTENSION - 4"(1-1/Y - 01 AGGREGATE BASEROCK S. BASE ROCK Y-0 OR 3/4"-D, 9570 COMPACTION. BASE ROCK SHALL BE TO REQUIRED WHEN VALVE NUT O INSTALLATION SHOWN IS ONLY A SUGGESTION. SUBGRADE OF STREET STRUCTURE OR 4`IN DEPTH, WHICHEVER IS GREATER. IS DEEPER THAN 3 FEET ® 24" FROM FINISHED GRADE. 1. DOUBLE CHECK TO BE LOCATED DIRECTLY BEHIND WATER METER. 6. DRAIN/M,'E°LOCKOUT-3"DIAMETER PLASTIC PIPE: NOTES: 3)CENTER VALVE BOX ON A. 3"I.D.PLASTIC PIPE WITH COUPUNG. I. JONTS TO BE TACK MID SANDED. AXIS OF CPER.NUT. 2. BRASS,STAINLESS, OR PLASTIC PLUGS TO BE INSTALLED IN TEST 8. DRAINAGE ACCESS THROUGH EXISTING CURBS SHALL BE CORE DRILLED OR CURB 4)PROVIDE 24"SQUARE BY 4`THICK - COCKS IF BELOW GROUND INSTALLATION. SAW CUT VERTICALLY 18"EACH SIDE OF DRAIN AND REPOURED TO FULL DEPTH OF CURB. a ASPHALT PLACED IN MAX.S LIFTS EACH COMPACTED TO AM MN. CONCRETE PAD AROUND VALVE 24 3. DISTANCE FROM BOTTOM OF DEVICE TO FINISH GRADE.FREEZE PROTECTION. C. 4N0 A DRAINAGE ACCESS THROUGH NEW CURBS SHALL BE PLACED A MINIMUM OF 20' 3. SAWCUT SHALL BE TAC COATED AM BITUMINUS ASPHALT EMULSION. ODA OUTSIDE OF PAVED AREAS AND CLEARENCE FOR TESTING AND REPAIR ARE THE MAJOR CONSDERATIONS AND A MAXIMUM CF 3.0'FROM PROPERTY LINES. AS SHOWN IN CONCRETE PAD DETAIL CONCRETE FOR INSTALLATION. rm..... - ND SCALE ..Yeas n Xo s.a "'°°": xo SEAS ""'°n NO SCALE Q V! }Aii;ii, MOM v,aamw.COMMENT AWAN A.owNC Ora Na Oo•oYn olPUnIIDn P.01°AM PAVEMENT DIG—OUT ,� Bwmna m.A�wrt AwXTI P.O MS o acu.a oe,w.oB MUM P.MOMS ® u•u�^ °"'� CURB GUTTER ® .+ ® ,,, [MOM= TYPICAL GATE OK.Ma m I I.s DOUBLE CHECK Y C NO. W OTT v TrMO 'x t 'M"°"" 126 YIY v,�.o �+� ....,III AND REPAIR 1 82 Hm ,,MAID ;��I NlJlol ion VALVE 503 mT �„o %%� "�+' 'M� ASSEMBLY 530.� ...•.... _ AMP/tMI. �. /MAW MK �. .N..�w CO Cl..{. O (V SAMTM T .----------� N.m"""®T o T-o a PUE II `W, Z p co^ SW1:40 A 100' 5.-8"—I 1 1 ''- V `T MAN?I ONOTN4 AMMAN. I 5 1 OR All LEGEND a. NN' LOT TO BE I ►lb'- IT W 06. 111 BASE MAIER./ }0 I SERVED W `I L,L. W O TRAFFIC SIGN I o T� 100 < T ` j` I E CONSTRUCTION ZONE MIIIN I Z � W 3 ��i m R I B I ( V • TRAFFIC CONES OR '"`"I 0 ppp��,,,+ '-0• M< I W C Q a 1 APPROPRIATE DELNEARON 6 MIN. limiiirr.. Z G ` \ 2229333 DEVICE. t00' I PROPERTY LINE MJ s u o E; IOU'� I. t—O . TO IRRIGATION Th- B v LO J— � 1- o T I .• I .11►� �� I m +U MIN. = I MIN. ; a g PROPERTY LINE AND LOT ;Cg 1. TRAFFIC CONTROL PLANS REQUIRED. 12' ~ NUMBERS MARKED IN WHITE TO RESIDENCE C / PAINT ON FACE OF CURB a k 2. TRAFFIC SIGNS TO BE 4B"X 4a" 0 u I) PLAN tr I' Sg BLACK ON ORANGE I• i < (SEE NOTE 1 41, k1 • 1IN 0 PLAN 1 3. NO CO LECTOR STREET LANE OR �• 03 METER BOX EB r LOCAL STREET CLOSURES DURNG U DOUBLE CHECK .i" BAGGER• VALVE ASSEMBLY 1HE FOLLOWING TIME PERIODS: r � ,I I„ Ir Mw • a'mN ` I 100' B`-8" d f`/`�/%/�//`--i/%ij i/_ REV. I DATE L BY B.NN=MO maw 7:00 —9:00 A.M. N \ �\//` \//�// 1 I OU OOE Or PPE KU 3:30 -6:00 P.M. i V` \�\� \/\\ 1 Y 18 I I �a 4. INSTALL IN ACCORDANCE WITH THE "�� �i�! -ter i` I .,' I I r AP MANUAL ON UNIFORM TRAFFIC CONTROL 100• 6� �i /:7h:.L,. ,C.. -l- 6" " i• \ MN. ` I t* - I I ••� U.S. DEPT.OF TRANSPORTATION,HIGHWAYS", I I •%.�.../1.1, 1'..%;f%'•oRa• 1 I ,`I�I■w�Vl`%›*'4 1 FHUA, 1988 EDITION. O. //// CUSTOMER SIDE 1°UNION EACH SIDE •P!;PO•/;��//∎'we.',i• ,. I I O.K.tamuAnw 5. ACTUAL SIGN PLACEMENT TO BE NM. ELEVATION ���'^ CRUSHED ROCK BASE ELEVATION I 1 STABUZATICK.5 tAC RED- ADJUSTED IN FIELD. .1 r SEE PLUMBING CODE 6. THE OTT RESERVES TON RIGHT TO ADD TO O 1 �+.'�� NOTES: 2" FOR DEPTH OF COVER PROJECT NO. OR MODIFY TRAFFIC CONTROL REQUIREMENTS "yL.m^yII,� INSTALLATION SHOWN IS ONLY A SUGGESTION. 2003-p J A 5 AS MAY BE NECESSARY TO EFFECTIVELY 1. SURVEYOR TO INSTALL TEMPORARY GV6f f 'Y NOTE: CONTROL TRAFFIC AND TO ENSURE PUBIJC HUB AND GUARD STAKE OR I. DOUBLE CHECK TO BE LOCATED DIRECTLY BEHIND WATER METER. 1. SURFACING OF PAVED AREAS SHALL COMPLY WITH STREET OJT STANDARD DRAWING. SAFETY. GUARDSTAKE AT LOT LINE FOR 2. BRASS, STAINLESS,OR PLASTIC PLUGS TO BE INSTALLED IN TEST DATE I 5/03 2 JOINTS TO BE TACK AND SANDED. ETER INSTALLATION. METER 7. NO LANE CLOSURES WITHIN 200 FEET Cr F 2. INSTATED BY CITY OF IIGARD COCKS IF BELOW GROUND INSTALLATION. DESIGNED I C. HAFFNER ENGNEERI R. SLYH 3. SAWLTJT SHALL BE TACK COATED WITH BITUMINUS ASPHALT EMULSION. A TRAFFIC SIGNAL WITHOUT PRIOR CITY ANGLE STOP 3. DISTANCE FROM BOTTOM OF DEVICE TO FINISH GRADE,FREEZE PROTECTION, APPROVAL '....,......._ AND CLEARENCE FOR TESTING AND REPAW ARE NE MAJOR CONSIDERATIONS CHECKED L TYPE "K" SOFT FOR INSTALLATION. COPPER TUBING SHEET TITLE Yo RULE "Y°•• NO SCALE NO ROLE Y.00 n NO SCALE PUBLIC o..mM toANVert ABIIS1r I.IAIEMAS TRENCH o.c,� e•urtoa,.u.A �A��IMIOt4f TYPICAL TRAFFIC ONO.AO. •.umM.o arA+nrar AtNSTN P.MOMS 3/4" & I• IK Na flR INrYrAOn _ __ ApAf M• CODAS IRRIGATION DOUBLE 6I•Ya DETAILS ere ea Ise.am E ® Y III,. BACK ILL 180 ® F 8r; MAWCIt MI CONTROL PLAN 190 ,® , ,I,.a I.E. — 520 �,,�,,,N„ + 531 ova 4 CITY OF MIND A WWI SHEET NUMBER W. WATER SERVICE MACH 1MM CHECK ASSEMBLY MR 01909 NW one..err 5 DESIGN REVIEW v Minuteman Press - 747 ..emonso - Drainage Plan June 5, 2003 Page 5 NRCS DATA Table Jib. - Physical Properties of the Soils Washington County,Oregon Entries under"Erosion Factors-T'apply to the entire profile. Entries under"Wind Erodibility Group"and"Wind Erodibility Index"apply only to the surface layer. Absence of an entry indicates that data were not estimated. Erosion Factors Wind Wind Map Symbol Moist Permeability Available Linear Organic Erodi- Erodi- and Soil Name Depth Sand Silt Clay Bulk (Ksat) Water Extensi- Matter Kw Kf T bility bility Density Capacity bility Group Index In Pct Pct Pct g/cc In/Hr In/In Pct Pct 1: Aloha 0-8 - - 15-20 1.35-1.55 0.6-2 0.19-0.21 0.0-2.9 2.0-3.0 .32 .32 5 5 56 8-46 - - 18-27 1.40-1.55 0.2-0.6 0.19-0.21 0.0-2.9 0.5-2.0 .43 .43 46-65 - - 10-25 1.45-1.60 0.2-0.6 0.16-0.21 0.0-2.9 0.0-0.5 .55 .55 2: Amity 0-12 - - 15-25 1.20-1.45 0.6-2 0.19-0.21 0.0-2.9 3.0-5.0 .32 .32 5 6 48 12-40 - - 27-35 1.20-1.40 0.2-0.6 0.19-0.21 3.0-5.9 0.5-3.0 .49 .49 40-60 - - 10-25 1.20-1.45 0.6-2 0.19-0.21 0.0-2.9 0.0-0.5 .55 .55 3E: Astoria 0-5 - - 20-27 0.85-0.95 0.6-2 0.25-0.35 0.0-2.9 5.0-10 .32 .32 5 6 48 5-20 - - 25-35 0.70-1.00 0.6-2 0.15-0.20 0.0-2.9 5.0-10 .32 .32 20-50 - - 40-60 0.90-1.20 0.6-2 0.13-0.15 3.0-5.9 2.0-5.0 .28 .28 50-60 - - - --- - - - -- -- Astoria 0-5 - - 20-27 0.85-0.95 0.6-2 0.25-0.35 0.0-2.9 5.0-10 .32 .32 5 6 48 5-20 -- - 25-35 0.70-1.00 0.6-2 0.15-0.20 0.0-2.9 5.0-10 .32 .32 20-50 - - 40-60 0.90-1.20 0.6-2 0.13-0.15 3.0-5.9 2.0-5.0 .28 .28 50-60 -- - -- --- -- --- - -- -- -- 4B: Briedwell 0-12 - - 18-25 1.10-1.30 0.6-2 0.18-0.20 0.0-2.9 3.0-5.0 .28 .28 3 6 48 12-26 - - 25-35 1.20-1.30 0.6-2 0.13-0.19 3.0-5.9 1.0-3.0 .24 .32 26-60 - -- 25-30 1.20-1.30 0.6-2 0.04-0.06 0.0-2.9 0.0-0.5 .20 .32 5B: Briedwell 0-12 - - 18-25 1.20-1.40 0.6-2 0.12-0.19 0.0-2.9 2.0-6.0 .17 .32 5 8 0 12-26 -- -- 25-35 1.20-1.40 0.6-2 0.12-0.18 3.0-5.9 0.5-2.0 .24 .37 26-60 -- -- 25-30 1.20-1.40 0.6-2 0.04-0.06 0.0-2.9 0.2-0.5 .20 .28 USDA Natural Resources Conservation Service Distribution Generation Date:8/13/02 Page 1 of 23 Table K1. -Water Features Washington County,Oregon Depths of layers are in feet. Estimates of the frequency of ponding and flooding apply to the whole year rather than to individual months. Absence of an entry indicates that the feature is not a concern or that data were not estimated. Water Table Ponding Flooding Map Symbol Hydrologic and Soil Name Group Month Upper Lower Surface P PP Duration Frequency Duration Frequency Limit Limit Depth Ft Ft Ft 1: Aloha C January 1.5-2.0 1.7-3.3 - - None --- None February 1.5-2.0 1.7-3.3 - - None --- None March 1.5-2.0 1.7-3.3 - - None -- None April 1.5-2.0 1.7-3.3 - - None -- None December 1.5-2.0 1.7-3.3 - - None -- None 2: Amity D January 0.5-1.5 >6.0 - - None -- None February 0.5-1.5 >6.0 - - None --- None March 0.5-1.5 >6.0 - - None --- None April 0.5-1.5 >6.0 - -- None --- None May 0.5-1.5 >6.0 - -- None --- None November 0.5-1.5 >6.0 -- --- None --- None December 0.5-1.5 >6.0 -- --- None --- None 3E: Astoria B Jan-Dec - - None --- None 3F: Astoria B Jan-Dec - -- None --- None 4B: Briedwell B Jan-Dec - -- None --- None 5B: Briedwell B Jan-Dec - - None --- None 5C: Briedwell B Jan-Dec - -- None --- None 5D: USDA Natural Resources Conservation Service Distribution Generation Date:8/13/02 Page 1 of 20 Minuteman Press - 7475 demons() -Drainage Plan June 5, 2003 Page 6 CALCULATIONS Site Hydrographs 0.4 0.35 I 4 ii 0.3 5 1 it 0.25 III 1 1 1 Pre Development 25 yr o k Developed 25 yr 3 0.2 11 -- - Developed 100 yr T. E ! --- - Pond Outfall, 25 yr 1 0.15 t .i -- --- Pond Outfall, 100 yr 111' 0.1 k ' j-} 0.05 r w a y, .' ' 1 0 U 1 I\ li 0 10 20 30 40 50 Time (hrs) Drainage Plan Santa Barbara Urban Hydrograph Summary Client: Minuteman Press Location: 7475 Hermonso Way, Tigard, Oregon County: Washington County Watershed Description Design Storm Duration Precip (in) Total Area Percent Pervious CN Impervious CN Time to Peak Frequency (hr) (ac) Impery Area (ac) Pervious Area (ac) Impervious Conc. Flow, Q (min) (cfs) Total Watershed Pre-development 25 24 3.9 0.43 19% 0.35 78 0.08 100 32 0.15 Post-development 25 24 3.9 0.43 63% 0.16 78 0.27 100 32 0.30 100 24 4.5 0.43 63% 0.16 78 0.27 100 13 0.36 Detention Volume and Orifice Si?1h9 Elevation 1 77 Area 300 Vo/ume 178 Note: 998 Cu/nu/at/ye VOlume Storage 649 age belo Orifice F w 1 77 649 2/3 water Q Gate Io 1 ;reduced to account for water quality treatment volume Orifice 0.13 cfs Diameter.----- 1 0 feet Storm!Site Peak inflow 100 r (cfs) Ow Peak pYr 0.3 lcfs)�Ow Storage 2.19 in 0.36 0.15 (cfJequired Time of Crest (firs) Crest Elevation 8S 1770 177.2 Water Quality Treatment Calculations Impermeable Area = 0.27 ac Water Quality Storm = 0.36 in Water Quality Volume (WQV)= 357 cf Water Quality Flow(WQF)= 0.0248 cfs 2/3 Water Quality Pool Depth (H) = 1 feet D = 24 x[OFR/(Cx(2xgxH )05)/Tc]05 Orifice Diameter= 0.96 in Swale Characteristics Roughness, n = 0.2 Slope, S= 0.0025 ft/ft Area = 2 feetA2 Wetted Perimeter= 8 feet Hydraulic Radius, R = 0.25 feet Velocity V= (1.486/n)*R^0.6*S^0.5= 0.16 ft/sec Length , L= 100 feet Flow Time 10.31 minutes Time of Concentration Calculation Pre-development Conditions Sheet Flow Tt= ( 0.93 L 0.6 x n 0.3 1( 104xS03 ) T,=Travel Time n = Mannings Coefficient 0.4 L= Flow Length 150 I = Rainfall Intensity in inches per hour 0.74 S= Slope of the hydraulic grade line 0.1 Tt=Travel Time= 32 minutes Time of Concentration Calculation Post-development Conditions Sheet Flow Tt= ( 0.93L°6xn0.3) 1( 10.4xs0.3) Tt = Travel Time n = Mannings Coefficient 0.02 L = Flow Length 150 I = Rainfall Intensity in inches per hour 0.74 S = Slope of the hydraulic grade line 0.1 Tt= Travel Time = 13 minutes Neighborhood Meeting Minutes Thursday, June 12, 2003 Meeting Time: 6:00 P.M. Meeting Location: Landmark Ford Conference Room 12000 SW 66th Avenue Tigard, Oregon 97223 Purpose of Meeting: (1) Required meeting as part of Site Development Review—Type II application. (2) To discuss with attendees our intentions to remove the existing residence and construct a new commercial office building. (3) To discuss the proposed project, timelines and office use once the project is complete. Attendees: David Waters 5335 SW 42nd Ave., Portland, OR 97221 Realtor Agent Harish Patez 7615 SW Beveland, Tigard, OR 9723 Neighbor Mary VonRenchler 7475 SW Hermoso Way, Tigard, OR 97223 Neighbor Bob Davidson 23792 Robson Terrace, Sherwood, OR Developer Mike Keezor Gresham, OR Contractor Rory Antis 24495 NE Hwy 240,Newberg, OR 97132 Minutes (Meeting started at 6:10 p.m.) I. Introductions II. Purpose of Meeting—Read prepared statement from City of Tigard III. Presentation of proposed project Site Plan and Elevations IV. Comments, Questions and Answers a. (Mary) Who is the tenant? Answer: Minuteman Press b. (Dave) Front of building looks nice, resembles house not an office Answer: (Bob) Traditional style, Timeless architecture, warm feel, and welcome. c. (Mary) What kind of increased traffic? What kind of other tenants would there be? Concern of traffic and strangers. Children present in neighborhood and pets. Answer: (Bob) The employees will be arriving in the morning and leaving in the afternoon. Customers rarely come to the office. We make deliveries 2 to 3 times per day. Paper is delivered in the morning and the UPS truck picks up almost every afternoon. d. (Mary) What street will the deliverers use? Answer: (Bob) They will probably use Beveland. e. (Mary) You can't make them use Beveland? Answer: I will tell them they must use Beveland. f. (Mary) There has been increased traffic from Lowes. Speed is a problem. Beveland would be preferred, if you can get them to use it. g. (Harish) What is the size of the lot? Answer: (Rory) 125'X150'. (Bob) 'A acre. h. Is the house being taken out completely? Answer: (Bob) Yes. (Rory) We would like to relocate the house. If it is not relocated then we will tear it down. (Bob) If it cannot be relocated we may call a salvage company to come and take out whatever they can use. i. Is Minuteman a franchise? Answer: (Bob) Yes, but independently owned. There are about 860 locations woldwide. j. (Mary) What is the time frame? We are submitting for Site Design Review in the next few days. We will submit to the Building Department concurrently. This process will take approximately 10 weeks. k. (Harish) How many square feet is the office? Answer: 3200-3300 square foot footprint 1. (Harish) Where does the runoff water go? Answer: (Rory) The water runs into the swale at the East end of the property where it is clarified before exiting the property to the northwest. It will runoff as it does now. m. (Harish) Will you be keeping the shrubs along the (rear)property line? Answer: (Rory) We have not yet determined if we will keep the arbor vitae, there are many possibilities. (Bob) I had an arborist take a look at the trees on site. He said the two fir trees need to come down because they have forked trunks. The trees taken down will be replaced inch for inch. n. (Mary) Will there be a fence around the property? Answer: (Rory) We are not planning to have a fence. Do you want one? (Mary) Yes. It is a privacy issue, a fence would be preferred. (Bob) There will be no fence. In the Tigard Triangle, I don't see businesses with fences around them. We will not be putting up a fence. (Harish) A chain link fence would be ugly. (Bob) There is an existing 4 foot chain link fence around the property. I don't like chain link fences. (Rory) The existing chain link fence will be taken down. It was installed on the neighbor to the South's property. We will rectify the situation by removing the fence. o. (Harish) How is the trash enclosed? Will you see it? Answer: (Rory) We are proposing a trash enclosure (here). The exterior materials of the enclosure will be similar to the building, to tie them together. You will not be able to see through the enclosure except the cracks around the gates. There will also be recycling inside. (Bob) The paper recycling will be inside the building, so it does not get wet. Meeting ended: 6:45 P.M. Second Meeting (A second meeting was required, because the meeting facility did not have an elevator.) Meeting Time: 6:50 P.M. Meeting Location: Landmark Ford Conference Room 12000 SW 66th Avenue Tigard, Oregon 97223 Purpose of Meeting: (1) Required meeting as part of Site Development Review—Type II application. (2)To discuss with attendees our intentions to remove the existing residence and construct a new commercial office building. (3)To discuss the proposed project, timelines and office use once the project is complete. Attendees: Alan Roth 7420 SW Hermoso Way, Tigard, OR 97223 Neighbor Linda Roth 7420 SW Hermoso Way, Tigard, OR 97223 Neighbor Bob Davidson 23792 Robson Terrace, Sherwood, OR Developer Mike Keezor Gresham, OR Contractor Rory Antis 24495 NE Hwy 240,Newberg, OR 97132 Minutes (Meeting started at 6:50 p.m.) II Introductions III Purpose of Meeting—Read prepared statement from City of Tigard IIII Presentation of proposed project Site Plan and Elevations Comments, Questions and Answers: a. (Linda) Are you taking the house out? Answer: (Rory) Yes. The house will be relocated, recycled or torn down. Our preference is to have the building relocated. (Bob) We would like to see the building relocated. It is a good well built home. If we can't move the building we will contact a company to salvage the building. There is a lot of good materials (i.e. hardwood floors). b. (Alan) What kind of traffic will it generate? Answer: (Bob) Our company will generate 8 trips in and out. There will also be deliveries 3-4 times per day. c. (Alan) How long have you been in business? Answer: (Bob) 15 years d. (Alan) Where? Answer: (Bob) Canterburry Square. e. (Alan) Are you from this area? Answer: (Bob) Yes, grew up in Gresham. Moved to Sherwood. Bob also discussed his involvement in the community and community groups. f. (Alan) What type of business is leased space? Answer: (Bob) Office, professional(attorney, CPA, engineer, etc.) This is not a storefront. We are not looking for retail tenants. g. (Alan) Will this building fit in with future development? Answer: (Bob) Yes, with the brick design. The traditional style never is out of style. (Rory) The building is designed to fit into the neighborhood now and in the future. h. (Linda) How long will the construction take? Answer: (Rory) 6 months. i. (Alan) When will the construction start? Answer: (Rory) In about 10 weeks. j. (Alan) Have you had good success with City of Tigard? Answer: (Rory) We have had no obstacles to this point. k. (Linda) What is happening with property next door? Answer: (Bob) The owner will use the house as an office. 1. (Alan) Nice concept in architecture, I like the design. How many square feet? (Rory) 3200 square feet on the first and second floor, 840 square feet in the attic. m. (Alan) Is the stairs the only way to the upper floor? Answer: (Bob) Yes. We are not putting in an elevator. (Alan) I am not looking for an elevator and don't believe you need one. n. If you need any handicap information, please feel free to contact me. Meeting ended: 7:35 Neighborhood Meeting Minuteman Press June 12, 2003 Sign in Sheet Name/Address: ( aRi-e C Z, .S 235 s y24/0 40�7 Poe-r,Of? 5 722/ Name/Address: HA 21---C 44 QA i eZ '7 61 i s v ) }i_e"-ir-lce.A-.4 Name/Address: \Als�Z-`1 \o J 141 S `J vj s. Ir.6- IL- tY (j Name/Address: G �'-'� � R1)-1-1‘., 'IL -tD S L4J kT/1'‘D 5 D WiL y Name/Address: Name/Address: Name/Address: Name/Address: Name/Address: Name/Address: Name/Address: Name/Address: Name/Address: Name/Address: Name/Address: Name/Address: Name/Address: Name/Address: Name/Address: Name/Address: Name/Address: Name/Address: Name/Address: Name/Address: Name/Address: TFCLnSIf 7545 SW Hermosa Way Transit (None In Area) Busstops.shp lyBuslines.shp Taxlots.shp �� Streets.shp Ai Freeways N Arterials A/ Minor Streets Pralilla A/Arterial.shp Freeways Major Streets II* 1111111111111". MI MI ID 1 N Wash.shp y ��� - '. stewart BEVELAN. ,title of oregon GONZAGA N Ji \ -7,- `\ E 0.05 0 0.05 0.1 Miles S i 7545 SW Herrnoso Way Parks (None In Area) &1" --EhMHVR511 Parks.shp Park Taxlots.shp Streets.shp /',/ Freeways A/Arterials 011111111111111 I A/ Minor Streets Arterial.shp Freeways Major Streets i■ Wash.shp lilt .11111111111111/4 i NI al , • ■ J : , .II, ail 1111111111 , ; ,444.00 1 stewart -title of oregon BEVELAN i N GONZAGA \ I\ E 0.05 0 0.05 0.1 Miles S I i I - 7545 SW Hermoso Contours Way 4:Liri *% Contours.shp Taxlots.shp / ���,.,�.,.,;�, _ Streets.shp„„„ �.:b /\/ Freeways IV A/ Arterials �'/ Minor Streets Ifi Ar terial.shp 11 Freeways For,,,E,... .11111r Major Streets y��: Wash.shp 3, Frn di *"Naga I 1 1 I I I 1,agilla I I 1 II I 1111 MEM cn 0 111 IL. stewart ‘ ino . w• . : L—+title of Oregon 0 �4 % ,` , • . fi 111 ' 0 N ■ ,I, E 0.05 0 0.05 0.1 Miles S T s±udj 09/09/2003 10: 16 15032738169 KITTELSON PAGE 02:''07 KITTELSON & ASSOCIATES, INC. TRANSPORTATION PLANNING/TRAFFIC ENGINEERING 610 SW ALDER,SUITE 700 • PORTLAND, OR 97205 - (603)228.6230 • FAX(509)273.8168 MEMORANDUM Date: September 8, 2003 Project#: 6164 To: Mr. Mike Keyser RA Gray& Co. Purcell Inc. P.O.Box 23516 Tigard, OR 97281 From: Dina M. Sykora, Senior Engineering Associate Julia A. Kuhn,P.E., Principal Engineer Project: Proposed Minuteman Press Office Building Development Subject: Trip Generation and Distribution Assessment At your request, we have prepared a trip generation assessment for the proposed 7,240 square- foot Minuteman Press Office Building in Tigard, Oregon. The proposed site is located on the west side of SW Hermoso Way north of SW Beveland Road. Figure 1 shows the proposed development plan. The intent of this memorandum is to provide an estimation of the trips associated with the proposed development and their distribution along the site vicinity roadways. This estimation will provide the City of Tigard with an assessment of the new trips that will be added to the immediate area as a result of the development and the distribution of those trips to nearby intersections. This assessment can be used to help determine the site's proportionate share of costs associated with needed intersection improvements. City of Tigard Transportation Impact Study Requirements Because the proposed development is located within the Tigard Triangle, the City requires an evaluation of site-generated trips distributed through the SW 72n6 Avenue/SW Dartmouth Street and SW 68th Avenue/SW Dartmouth Street intersections. Based on recent discussions and coordination with the City of Tigard, a trip generation and distribution analysis is required for this development proposal. The trips associated with the proposed development are evaluated based on the new trips to the system.The City of Tigard will review the analysis to determine the site's proportionate share of costs at these two intersections. H:�inv�c�sowenoow�ear.; ®_aa 09/0912003 10: 16 15032738169 KITTELSON PAGE 03!6-- Proposed Minuteman Press office Building Development Project#. 6164 September 8, 2003 Page 2 Project Description and Trip Generation The proposed Minuteman Press Building is bordered by SW Hermoso Way to the east, and an existing single family residence. The proposed site will include the development of a 7,240 square-foot building on the site of an existing residential home with an 18,750 square-foot parcel. It is expected that there will be 17 parking spaces on the site. The proposed access driveway to the site will be located on SW Hermoso Way, approximately 150 feet north of SW Beveland Road, as shown in Figure 1. The number of trips anticipated as part of the proposed office development was estimated using information presented in Trip Generation, Institute of Transportation Engineers, 6th Edition (1997). This information is summarized in Table 1. Table 1 Trip Generation Size Total Weekday AM. Peak Weekday P.M. Peak Land uoa Cie (square- Dolly Hour Hour feet) Trips Total In Out Total In Out Proposed Development General Office 710 7,240 80 11 10 1 11 2 9 Building As shown in Table 1 above, the proposed Minuteman Press Office Building is anticipated to generate approximately 80 net new daily trips; of which approximately 11 net new trips could be generated during both the weekday a.m. and p.m. peak hours. Trip Distribution The distribution of site-generated trips onto the study area roadways was determined through a review of the surrounding roadway network, historical traffic patterns, and the proximity of access to 1-5, Highway 99E and Highway 217. The resulting estimated trip distribution pattern for the site is illustrated in Figure 2. Based on the trip distribution pattern, Figure 3 shows the assignment of site-generated trips during the weekday a.m. and p.m. peak hours. As shown in Figure 3, the traffic associated with the proposed Minuteman Press Building at the SW 72'1 Avenue/SW Dartmouth Street and SW 68th Avenue/SW Dartmouth Street intersections is anticipated to be five vehicles or less during both peak periods and will therefore not significantly impact the transportation system. Summary of Findings The following summarizes the findings based on the trip generation assessment described above. The proposed Minuteman Press Office Building development is estimated to generate approximately 80 new daily trips, of which approximately 11 new trips could occur during the weekday a.m. peak hour and 11 new trips could occur during the weekday p.m. peak hour. Kittelson &Associates, Inc. Portland, Oregon 09/09/2003 10:16 15032738169 KITTELSON PAGE 04/07 Proposed Minuteman Press Office Building Development Project#: 6164 September 8, 2003 Page 3 • The traffic volume generated by the proposed Minuteman Press Office Building through the SW 72nd Avenue/SW Dartmouth Street and SW 68th Avenue/SW Dartmouth Street intersections will not significantly impact the transportation system. If you have any questions regarding this memorandum or would like additional information, please call us at (503)228-5230. Kirtelson &Associates, Inc. Portland, Oregon 09/09/2003 10:16 15032738169 KITTELSON PAGE 05:'0^ MlnUteman Press Building Development September 2003\ U !� J (NO SCALE) • t.vvr:for ttrsZettit,1 4 1 teti co) c S.W. BEVELANO ST. SITE PLAN II TIGARD, OREGON • KITTELSON&ASSOCIATES,INC. L\TiTIMI151MTIMPUNG 09/09/2003 10:16 15032738169 KITTELSON PAGE 06/07 Minuteman Press Building Development September e INJ (NO SCALE) 401■------_______________0■ SW DARTMOUTH ST 2«2 p 20% w > I a 0 Z SW ELMHURST ST N SW >LU > HE RMQSO I L- I CO CO Nal. co SW BEVELAND `� RD co tri SITE TRIP DISTRIBUTION PATTERN L TIGARD, OREGON J KIT &KTELSON ASSOCIATES,INC. TRANSPORTATION PUNNING/TRAFFIC:ENGI►VERING 09/09/2003 10:16 15032738169 KITTELSON PAGE 07/07 Minuteman Press Bui lding Development September 2003 AM PEAK HOUR 8,, . . . . . . . . . . . . , . . . . . . . . . . . . (NO SCALE) • •SW DARTMOUTH ST ? 2-..x �3 . .. a 0 N SW ELMHURST ST SW 3 w w HERMOSO N < a a SITS d SW 8E1/ELAND qD co c% • .1) . 1 PM PEAK HOUR _ . • • . . • SW DARTMOUTH ST ort < . '. r Z SW ELMHURST ST N ot SW N w w HERMOSO Q Q siTE . 4� SW BEVELAND RD 5 l SITE-GENERATED TRAFFIC VOLUMES ''''''"�_ TIGARD, OREGON 3 J FA KITTELSON &ASSOCIATES,INC. L TRANSPORTATION PLANNNO/TRAFFIC ENC NEEFING Bike- hack Huntco Supply LLC Page 1 of 3 r_MAW HP Racks are a minimum of 36" high to provide proper clearance for parked bicycles. Galvanized, Powder Coated and Thermoplastic coated versions are constructed of ASTM A53 2" schedule 40 steel pipe (2-3/8" O.D. x .154 wall). Stainless Tj Steel version is constructed of ASTM A312 2" schedule 40 TP ip 304 stainless steel (2-3/8" O.D. x .154 wall). All Huntco bike racks are available in four types of finishes and in a wide range of colors. The HOT-DIPPED GALVANIZED finish is suitable for more HP stands for Hitching Post, and utilitarian bike rack placement. In the galvanizing process, it is that's what this time-tested rack very important that the metal surface be perfectly clean in order looks like. Its basic, clean for the zinc to adhere to the metal. Each bike rack is caustic appearance will coordinate with any cleaned to remove organic contaminants and sandblasted to area it's in. It holds two bikes. remove other surface contaminants. A dilute acid solution removes rust and a fluxing procedure removes oxides. Only then 3 par t ec:ific bins is the bike rack immersed in 98%pure molten zinc and allowed to dry in ambient air. The rack is then hand-filed to remove any CAD D a,,.dinas galvanizing flash. The result is a Huntco bike rack that is virtually abrasion-resistant. Our POWDER COAT FINISH resists chipping, rusting and fading. It is hard and tough enough to withstand the most extreme weather and heaviest usage conditions. We closely monitor each step of the powder coating process to ensure that Huntco's high standard of quality is evident in every finished bike rack. In order for the powder coating to adhere to the metal, the steel must be free of any scale, paint, varnish or rust. This substrate preparation includes a chemical wash and rinse. The bike rack is then pre-baked to eliminate any liquid residue. This is followed by an iron phosphate rust inhibitor treatment that also primes the surface. A polyester coating, triglycidyl isocyanurate (TGIC)powder is then baked onto the prepared bench to a thickness of 6 to 8 mils. Huntco's standard POWDER COAT COLORS are Postal Blue (RAL 5022), Sky Blue (RAL 5010), Forest Green (RAL 6005), Yellow (RAL 1018), Bright Red(RAL 3001),Maroon (RAL 3007), Gloss Black (RAL 9004), Sky White(RAL 9001), Tan (RAL 8001), and Bronze (RAL 8014). Custom colors are readily available. http://www.huntco.com/bikeracks/hpracks/hpracks.html 9/15/2003 Huntco Supply LLC Page 3 of 3 FLANGE MOUNT i SIDE VIEW 4 x1/2"anchor bolts TOP VIEW IN-GROUND MOUNT A ! OUTLINE OF 12 ; CORE HOLE Flange and In-Ground Base Covers A great Huntco option - these covers can be used on any flange- mounted or in-ground installed rack. They give a perfect "finishing touch" to the rack and, when tack-welded in place over flanges, make it impossible to steal the rack and/or bikes. Call Huntco toll free at 1-800-547-5909 for more product information. We welcome custom orders on all of our fine products. If you think it can't be built, call us... we'll prove otherwise! Everything we make is covered by the famous Huntco Warranty. http://www.huntco.com/bikeracks/hp_racks/hpracks.html 9/15/2003 Post-its Fax Note D 7671 Date /(j 9_OZ IPeot ). j o Q " Lauf it, Rulkr From Ky�� S/nJ 4-I. Co./Dept. Co 7711")1) Phone# Phone# i. 8'98-3667 Fax# ,q"_5r76 Fax# 2 i HiRmo•O i �/ call ill z 511 A P T' w Q / B C r`l °c o w I // LLI aa #6183 . _ 6�Gy IZ'BFV m EVE AND ` � h O 12'BFy I I< m � B N D ,:1., l- co O Q .P 85928 .',7�p /17 �Y_°i.yam, ,?,a I I X5673 BEVEL` ND o �•h�� ��. Iz'cv °v • cn in co Fit . r _ 1` I 98 5uUS•in zI r- #6027 1* I I cm er ,n I I i �' I Q =. I II N O O O. 0 SeWer GD `0.-i' 0 r) 10/10/2002 13:22 FAX 5035981960 CITY OF 'I'1GARD UUI/LJUs FAX TRANSMITTAL ��4111111�1 -1 Date October 10, 2002 Number of pages including cover sheet 3 To: Laurie Butler From: Kristie Co: — Co: City of Tigard Fax#: 503-290-5576 Fax#: 503-598-1960 Ph #: L503) 639-4171, Ext. 2452 SUBJECT: Sewer Information MESSAGE: I;,ENG\FAX:+CT 10/10/BUG 113.22 FAA 5U35 US19 iU CITY UP' '1'1GA w LJuuz/uuJ 1 . I! • • • . I • L • • . . . . • . ' • . I • . i • • ! I I lir . , 11111111 1 1 ; . ,e A - T ./, . . I a. .. . ELIA , to _ _ .,.... . - . . . ... ', • .• 1 \: aim : . . . • . . . . . . . .. . . , • . . . . . ..• . . . . : . . . . . • . • . . i • . .. . , • . i . . • . . ... . . . • . . z • ! . . , . . . . • c, . . . . • . • . . • . . . . . . . . 1 . . . . . . • . . . .. Si 1 • Ir . 1 • L.`.■.:, ' '• • .. • • • • W,1 IJLI J/Ill V.) C l'Ix Ut*"i 1.tiAKU 2 14A.11. 50359819150 • • 1. 1 7515 SW HERMOSO wY, 7475 SW HERMOSO WY. FF.--i-184.0 FF=±195.0 . 1 '.. \ r"------ 7-----c-L_____ • 1 1 , . . ; :_c_x_i_3_:_s__„,\ ‘,, • . ; . . \ \ ;, . . ; . . . ' i_ • • 36.9.02 LF• ;,c,000ANir , ,..i...-- • ir AVC : :t I / • • — ' - ' I. 1 I I i .1 .1... .... 1_ 1 '....• _ . I I • I i . . . 1 . • I. • , ,...-..---1 r.------1 • 1 \ , . ' • . I . 1 i •■•••• •0 OM...■ 1 ; 7545 SW HERMOSO WY. I I ; 7460 Sw HERMOSO W 7450 Sw HERMOSO wY. ■ . Firm:I:191.D •I 2 i , FF ±1953.0 \KO RD:It i I hi : : \ . _ SO WY 1 i 1----- • ... !,_---s_ __-) . - . . . . i.,., . • ,i= i ?,.:., • \ i :,....fr. ?505 SW SEVELAND RD. • . $o WI° ; l'. • r4 ; N, .:.• F196.0 \ \ UNE 3 / '' i IN !.. :, 1.4' .. ,., SO vP.1 I .1. 1 , -.... 1.:2 . SO vv.,' \ 7565 Sw HERm0S4 WY. 1 ...• I-. •.• i -.I FP•=_+186,0 r: • !, it el •i'i. • I''',-.• :y....:1..C.:/••, '...:• . 11 ,o• f ! • ;,', 1.:•••:'.114...1'...i.'",..,:•.1 ;e• ( 1 1 -.: • I ••' •. 2 •, SO "-! \ . ■ \ r,e •AfY 1 ■ • , 1 1 I • I c . • .1 \\ — I_ A . 4 ' - 1 t' 10.2e ' ','• -94. s'... .,.,'"" , ••••i't '''"•'... 2 2.:::-• , . 1 _ _._..... - \', ! — i • . HY . .- • • - ssmH le-°48 . SO siee c;r2, n..".'n Ail Arborlsf P1os1 August 18, 2003 TREE PLAN FOR 7545 SW HERMOSO WAY MINUTEMAN PRESS NEW OFFICE BUILDING Prepared by: James Wentworth-Plato ISA certified arborist PN-1314 Emerald Tree Ccb# 141020 Tel# 503.310.5046 Purpose: 1. To meet Tigard city code requirements 2. To identify hazard trees and trees incompatible with the proposed building and landscape plans 3. To propose guidelines for the protection and preservation of existing landscape trees City Code As per chapter 18.790.030 B1, this tree plan includes a current tree inventory including location, size, and species. See page 3. As per 18.790.030 B2, the program to save existing trees can be found under the heading Preservation. The program to mitigate removed trees can be found under the heading Mitigation. As per 18.790.030 B3, trees to be removed are shaded on page 3. Onsite, the trees to be removed are flagged with pink tape. As per 18.790.030 B4, the standards and methods for tree protection can be found under the heading Preservation. Preservation The two trees targeted for preservation are the 12" Douglas fir on the southeast side of the property and the 20" Deodar cedar at the northwest corner of the property. Some soil compaction is inevitable from the installation of the drive and parking lot. Adhering to the following guidelines will minimize damage. Damage prevention • A protection barrier of chain-link fencing shall be installed around the trees to be preserved at the dripline prior to equipment being brought on site. • The fencing shall be maintained in good repair throughout the duration of the project, and shall not be removed, relocated, or encroached upon without permission of the arborist involved. • There shall be no storage of materials, supplies, or waste products of any kind within the area of the protection barrier. • Wash-down of concrete or cement-handling equipment shall not be permitted upslope within 50 feet or cross slope within 20 feet of protected trees. • The soil grade shall not change by more than 2" within the dripline at any time for the duration of this project. • All severed roots will be cut cleanly and roots with a diameter greater than 3" shall be cut only with permission of an arborist. • The crowns of both trees shall be raised to 15 feet to minimize damage from equipment. • The driveway shall be altered from Vegetation Plan L2 to allow installation without moving the protection fence from the 12" fir. • The northwest corner of the parking lot shall be altered from Vegetation Plan L2 to allow a minimum 10' radius planting bed for the Deodar cedar. Mitigation • The 24" fir at the south end of the center row of trees considered hazardous due to the tight angle crotch with included bark at 15'. As such, it is not included in mitigation calculations. As per city of Tigard code chapter 18.790.030 B2a this project will mitigate at a caliper inch replaced per caliper inch removed, an in lieu of payment per caliper inch, or a combination thereof equaling 134 caliper inches. • • Minuteman Press `::.:: :: .:` 7545 SW Hermoso Way ..:.r�❖.::-.•:..•::.•..`::`. Tigard, OR 97223 ' 20" Cedar 30" Fir ileir.''. '4 ..."..*::::::IiiiiiIiiiiiiinggiiiiir.-+" All shaded trees are to be removed 15" Male All open trees are to be preserved Proposed 'A i , Building Barricade fencing 20' Fir .41/...••••••••••••••••••, Q• Tree DBH Status sii:.;?y:i:;' O Deodar Cedar 20" Preserve 16" Fir•:° 0 Douglas Fir 17" Remove-incompatible :`.:'' :' < �'' 2 y:y;i;:;:,�i�`i`i��.;::::3:' w ..:' Douglas Fir 30" Remove-incompatible ;.;.;';;.;.;.y;.;;;;, _ Norway Maple 15" Remove-incompatible e :kr Douglas Fir 20" Remove-incompatible ":*%iliiiiiggiiiiiiIiiiiiiiiiii**.- U) Douglas Fir 16" Remove incompatible '.W, Douglas Fir 24" Remove-hazard Douglas Fir 12" Preserve Jeffrey Pine 36" Remove-incompatible 1 merald Tree N "'`•Jim Wentworth-Plato 12" Fir / PO Box 12591 : 36" Pine �'►'V`1'/ Portland, OR 97212 i•: iei; 503.310.5046 "�° CCB# 141020 ••••`s`s j 1 CITY OF TIGARD Community Development Shaping Better Community LAND USE PROPOSAL DESCRIPTION 120 DAYS = 2/5/2004 FILE NO.: SITE DEVELOPMENT REVIEW (SDR) 2003-00008 Type II Land Use Application FILE TITLE: MINUTEMAN PRESS APPLICANT: Bob Davidson OWNER: John and Marjorie Joens Minuteman Press PMB 1 30o 14285 SW Pacific Highway 944 Vetrans Way, #105 Tigard, OR 97224 Redmond, OR 97756 APPLICANT'S Rory Antis REP.: Gray Purcell, Inc. PO Box 23516 Portland, OR 97281-3516 REQUEST: The applicant is requesting Site Development Review approval to construct a 7,250 square foot commercial office building and associated site improvement. A 1,673 square foot residence currently occupies the site and is proposed to be removed. LOCATION: 7545 SW Hermoso Way; WCTM 2S101AB, Tax Lot 1501. ZONE: MUE: Mixed-Use Employment. The MUE zoning district is designed to apply to a majority of the land within the Tigard Triangle, a regional mixed-use employment district bounded by Pacific Highway (Hwy. 99), Highway 217 and 1-5. This zoning district permits a wide range of uses including major retail goods and services, business/professional offices, civic uses and housing; the latter includes multi-family housing at a maximum density of 25 units/acre, equivalent to the R-25 zoning district. APPLICABLE REVIEW Community Development Code Chapters 18.360, 18.390, 18.520, 18.620, 18.705, CRITERIA: 18.725, 18.745, 18.755, 18.765, 18.780, 18.790, 18.795 and 18.810. CIT AREA: East U DECISION MAKING BODY BELOW: ❑ TYPE I ® TYPE II Li TYPE III ❑ TYPE IV 1 DATE COMMENTS WERE SENT: OCTOBER 14, 2003 DATE COMMENTS ARE DUE: OCTOBER 28, 2003 I HEARINGS OFFICER (MON.) DATE OF HEARING: TIME: 7:00 PM I I PLANNING COMMISSION (MON.) DATE OF HEARING: TIME: 7:00 PM I (CITY COUNCIL (TUES.) DATE OF HEARING: TIME: 7:30 PM STAFF DECISION (TENTATIVE) DATE OF DECISION: NOVEMBER 20, 2003 COMPONENTS RELATED TO THE PROJECT AVAILABLE FOR VIEWING IN THE PLANNING DIVISION ® VICINITY MAP ® LANDSCAPING PLAN ® IMPACT STUDY ® SITE PLAN Z STORMWATER REPORT ® TRAFFIC IMPACT STUDY ® NARRATIVE ® ARBORIST REPORT ® OTHER: MISCELLANEOUS STAFF CONTACT: Mathew Scheideqqer, Associate Planner (503) 639-4171, Ext. 2437 July 8, 2003Nu i, i 1\ Grey Purcell CITY OF TIGARD Attn: Rory Antis P.O. Box 23516 OREGON Portland, OR 97281-3516 RE: Notice of Incomplete Submittal/SDR2003-00008 Dear Rory Antis: The City received your request for Site Development Review (SDR) approval for the above-referenced project. Based on a preliminary review of your application materials, Staff has determined that your submittal is incomplete for the purposes of continuing with Site Development Review. Please submit the following information in order for staff to begin your review: 1. Submit elevation drawings. The elevation drawings should show that fifty (50%) percent of the ground floor wall area facing the street are windows, display areas, or doorways. 2. Submit 2-sets of pre-stamped, pre-addressed envelopes. Applicants are required to request for a 500-foot property owner mailing list from the City of Tigard. Once the mailing list is obtained, applicants are to prepare 2-sets of pre-stamped, pre-addressed envelopes that are to be turned in when submitting their application for completeness. 3. Revise Plans. Show all vegetation within thirty (30) feet of the property line to insure visual clearance and off-site impacts are met. 4. Revise Plans. Provide a plan which indicates the location of the required bicycle parking area. Include a detail of the bike structure to be used. 5. Submit a tree plan prepared by a certified arborist for the removal, protection and planting of any trees. 6. Submit 19 additional sets of application materials including the narrative. Please make sure all plans are folded to 8'/2" x 11" at the time of submittal. If you have any questions, please feel free to contact me at 503-639-4171, x2437. Sincerely, eAc Mat ew Scheidegger Associate Planner :\c u r p l n\ma t h ew is d r\S D R2003-00008.a c c c: SDR2003-00008 Land use file 13125 SW Hall Blvd., Tigard, OR 97223 (503)639-4171 TDD (503)684-2772 si tr "te'F° - �s PUBLIC FACILITY PLAN Project: Minuteman Press COMPLETENESS CHECKLIST Date: 7/22/03 GRADING ® Existing and proposed contours shown. ® Does proposed grading impact adjacent parcels? ❑ Yes ® No ❑ Adjacent parcel grades shown. STREET ISSUES ® Right-of-way clearly shown. ® Centerline of street(s) clearly shown. ® S et name(s) shown. xisting/proposed curb or edge of pavement shown. Not clearly dimensioned. Sidewalk width does not comply with local street standards in the Tigard Triangle. ® Street profiles shown. ❑ Future Street Plan: Must show street profiles, topo n/a adjacent parcel(s), etc. Traffic Impact Report Not provided. ® Street grades compliant? ® Street widths dimensioned and appropriate? ❑ Private Streets? Less than 6 lots and width appropriate? ❑ Other: SANITARY SEWER ISSUES ® Existing/proposed lines shown. ® Stubs to adjacent parcels required/shown? WATER ISSUES ❑ Existing/proposed lines w/ sizes noted? Sizes not shown ❑ Existing/proposed fire hydrants shown? Not shown ® Proposed meter location and size shown? Size not shown ❑ Proposed fire protection system shown? NA STORM DRAINAGE AND WATER QUALITY ISSUES ® Existing/proposed lines shown? ® Preliminary sizing calcs for water quality/detention provided? ❑ Water quality/detention facility shown on plans? Downstream impact not fully identified. How will a concentrated discharge impact the downstream property? Show offsite topography. ❑ Area for facility match requirements from calcs? n/a ❑ Facility shown outside any wetland buffer? n/a ❑ Storm stubs to adjacent parcels required/shown? NA REVISED: 07/22/03 • LAND USE APPLICP'ION Dateect: •- ')P2CO3--g COMPLETENESS REVIEW COMPLETE g>,INCOMPLETE 'rS ANDARD INFORMATION: - ! Deed/Title/Proof Of Ownership Neighborhood Mtg. Affidavits, Minutes, List Of Attendees Z Impact Study (18.390) E� USA Service Provider Letter a Construction Cost Estimate ❑ _# Sets Of Application Materials/Plans Pre-Application Conference Notes Envelopes With Postage (Verify Count) PROJECT STATISTICS: Building Footprint Size "'_ % Of Landscaping On Site gEr__ % Of Building Impervious Surface On Site ❑ Lot Square Footage PLANS DIMENSIONED: ErN Building Footprint ❑ Parking Space Dimensions(Include Accessible&Bike Parking) ❑ Truck Loading Space Where Applicable ❑ Building Height Access Approach And Aisle ❑ Visual Clearance Triangle Shown ADDITIONAL PLANS: ,_I. Vicinity Map ❑ Architectural Plan ❑ Tree Inventory la Existing Conditions Plan Landscape Plan XSite Plan Lighting Plan TREE PLAN/MITIGATION PLAN: ❑ '.%°e ❑ ❑ ADDITIONAL REPORTS: (list any special reports) ❑ u ❑ ❑ ❑ - ❑ RESPONSE TO APPLICABLE-CODDECTIONS: ❑ 18.330(Conditional Use) ❑ 18.620(Tigard Triangle Design Standards) ❑ 18.765(Off-Street Parking/Loading Requirements) ❑ 18.340(Director's Interpretation) ❑ 18.630(Washington Square Regional Center) 18.775(Sensitive Lands Review) ❑ 18.350(Planned Development) ❑ 18.705(Access/Egress/Grculation) ❑ 18.780(Signs) ❑ 18.360(Site Development Review) ❑ 18.710(Accessory Residential Units) ❑ 18.785(Temporary Use Permits) ❑ 18.370(Yanances/Adjustments) E. 18.715(Density Computations) ❑ 18.790(free Removal) ❑ 18.380(Zoning Map/Text Amendments) ❑ 18.720(Design Compatibility Standards) ❑ 18.795(Yssual Clearance Areas) ❑ 18.385(Miscellaneous Permits) ❑ 1 8.725(Environmental Performance Standards) ❑ 18.797(Water Resources(WR)Overlay District) ❑ 18.390(Decision Making Procedures/Impact Study) ❑ 1 8.730(Exceptions To Development Standards) ❑ 18.798(Wireless Communication Facilities) ❑ 1 8.410(Lot Line Adjustments) ❑ 18.740(Historic Overlay) ❑ 18.810(Street&Utility Improvement Standards) ❑ 18.420(Land Partitions) ❑ 18.742(Home Occupation Peanuts) ❑ 1 8.430(Subdivisions) ❑ 1 8.745(Landscaping&Screening Standards) ❑ 18.510(Residential Ioning Districts) ❑ 18.750(Manufactured/Mobil Home Regulations) ❑ 1 8.520(Commercial Zoning Districts) ❑ 18.155(Mixed Solid Waste/Recyding Storage) ❑ 1 8.530(Industrial Zoning Districts) ❑ 18.760(Nonconforming Situations) ADDITIONAL ITEMS: __�rK``(1 =q. c C,2-,/ B7( d,„7'.::;,-- _Ji.�t,L Q`- .1-ce4 ,..r?'% ,,./20-,-.4 Gf --,-- _,�/ �.p�sL? I ,/ ��, .d ����t. :t ' �" . . j - r=�6a I:YcurpinUnastersUevisedUand use application completeness review..o REVIS�A: 17-r�D-01 -(6- ,1'h I .sf .14 "4"4A-1".r-"tek J"rs tee ceie.+■. 'F IP46sc-t Lucy 'T 'J`.1 --7%-P4-. gcA " loo A, ,Yt, CITY OF TIGARD October 10, 2003 OREGON Grey Purcell Attn: Rory Antis P.O. Box 23516 Portland, OR 97281-3516 RE: Notice of Complete Submittal/SDR2003-00008 Dear Rory Antis: The City has received the information necessary to begin the review of your Site Development application. Staff has, therefore, deemed your application submittal complete as of October 8, 2003 and will begin the review process. The estimated time for rendering a decision from the date an application is deemed as complete is 6-8 weeks. If you have any questions, please feel free to contact me at 503-639-4171, extension 2437. Sincerely, , mi=l i ‘ f- Mathew Scheidegger Associate Planner I:\curpl nvnathew\sdr\SDR2003-00008.acc.acc c: SDR2003-00008 Land use file 13125 SW Hall Blvd., Tigard, OR 97223 (503) 639-4171 TDD (503)684-2772 ADDITIONAL DOCUMENTS 12/18/2003 Conditions Associated With 1:40:49PM TIDEMARK Case #: SDR2003-00008 COMPUTER SYSTEMS, INC. ; ;..: .... :E: : : \ wv. .v.::wv. vw : }a\v+'4\n •rt.+�:Y •� ..:\v•. \ -v v \•: :n ti \ 'R.,+� sM'�YS49 0C�avZi4:+l ;.�.'.4..,t . . .`�. ..$Y T>:�.».>:'.%...... ?. i ..::^...:.:.... - .Y..\,.....+ .4Tn .. ::: .Y,.�. �. r ; �1? }..��" v. 4 < ,i • v v .. ...nu A.::::::,,,.v.{.n:v \ .1.�............i..'o:.o:y.; -v.:v 4:vxg:.:T g � �� � J: .ti::....:::':':S:::::4* 1 FENCE SIZE/LANDSCAPE TYPE None Met 12/17/2003 MAS 12/18/2003 PLL 21. Provide information regarding the size of the fence and type of landscaping to be used to screen the proposed refuse container. 1 FRANCHISE HAULER APPROVAL None NOT MET MAS 12/18/2003 SJR 22. Provide documentation that the franchise hauler for the area is satisfied that the design of the refuse container area is compatible with waste pick up practices. 1 INTERNAL PARKING STALLS STOPS None Met 12/17/2003 MAS 12/18/2003 PLL 23. The applicant is required to provide all internal parking stalls along the proposed sidewalk with wheel stops. 1 BICYCLE RACK None Met 12/17/2003 MAS 12/18/2003 PLL 24. Provide a 4-stall bicycle rack within 50 feet of the west entrance. 1 BICYCLE RACK DIRECTIONAL SIGNS None NOT MET MAS 12/18/2003 SJR 25. Provide directional signs back to the required bicycle rack. 1 BICYCLE RACK DETAILS None NOT MET MAS 12/18/2003 SJR 26. Submit details of the bicycle rack to be used. 1 BUILDING SETBACK/HERMOSA WAY None Met 12/17/2003 MAS 12/18/2003 PLL 1. Provide a plan showing the proposed building to be setback from SW Hermoso Way no greater than 10 feet and construct accordingly. 1 FRONT FACADE MINIMUM AREAS None Met 12/17/2003 MAS 12/18/2003 PLL 2. Provide a plan showing the front facade to include a minimum of 50 percent ground floor windows,display areas, or doorway openings and construct accordingly. 1 RED MAPLE PLANTINGS None Met 12/17/2003 MAS 12/18/2003 PLL 3. Submit information indicating that the Red Maples to be planted within the front yard setback will be a minimum of three and a half inch caliper and plant accordingly. 1 CITY OF TIGARD SIGN APPLICATION None NOT MET MAS 12/18/2003 SJR 4. Provide sign dimensions,plans, and a City of Tigard sign application to the Planning Technicians at the planning counter located in City Hall,for the proposed wall sign. 1 SIGN DISTANCE CERTIFICATION None NOT MET MAS 12/18/2003 SJR 5. The applicant's engineer shall provide a pre-construction sight distance certification and/or correct existing deficiencies. 1 PROPOSED PARKING LOT None Met 12/17/2003 MAS 12/18/2003 PLL 6. Provide a plan showing the proposed parking lot with a minimum of 19 parking stalls and construct accordingly. 1 TREE PROTECTION MEASURES PLAN None NOT MET MAS 12/18/2003 SJR 7. Prior to site work, the applicant must install all tree protection measures and contact the City's Forester and a member of the Planning Staff for sign-off. 1 SECURE PFI PERMIT None NOT MET KSM 12/18/2003 SIR 8. Prior to issuance of a site permit,a Public Facility Improvement(PFI)permit is required for this project to cover the half-street improvements in Hermoso Way and any other work in the public right-of-way(ROW). Eight(8)sets of detailed public improvement plans shall be submitted for review to the Engineering Department. NOTE:these plans are in addition to any drawings required by the Building Division and should only include sheets relevant to public improvements. Public Facility Improvement(PFI)permit plans shall conform to City of Tigard Public Improvement Design Standards,which are available at City Hall and the City's web page(www.ci.tigard.or.us). Page 3 of 3 CaseConditions..rpt Washington County,Oregon 2004-035932 RETURN RECORDED DOCU11'" 'T TO: "I2004 10:27:51 AM CITY HALL RECORDS DEPAi i1NT, Cnt■1 Stna19 K BARNEY CITY OF TIGARD ._..J$8.00$11.00•Total=$27.00 13125 SW Hall Blvd. Tigard,OR 97223 1111111 I 11 111 11111111111 111111111111 MI 00560503200400359320020021 I,Jerry Hanson,Director of A ment and Taxation and Ex-Officio County Clerk for Washington County, Oregon,do hereby certify that the within instrument of "' writing was received and recorded In the book of • ' i CORPORATION records of said county. ,+lam+. � � Jerry R.Hanson,Director ment and Taxation, ��y� Ex-0fficlo County Clerk File No.S��a-2D3 O ( DEDICATION DEED FOR ROAD OR STREET PURPOSES Space a.ove reserve, or Was ington County Recor,ing informat; / ( cL G G does hereby dedicate to the public a perpetual right-of-way for street,road,and utility purposes on, over,across,under, along, and within the following described real properties in Washington County,Oregon: Attached Exhibit"A" To have and to hold the above-described and dedicated rights unto the public forever for uses and purposes hereinabove stated. The grantors hereby covenant that they are the owner in fee simple and the property is free of all liens and encumbrances, they have good and legal right to grant their right above-described, and they will pay all taxes and assessments due and owing on the property. The true consideration for this conveyance is $ 0.00 . However, the actual consideration consists of or • includes other property or value given or promised which is the whole consideration. IN WITNESS WHEREOF,I hereunto set my hand on this_,4,3ik day of 4 .1ed,//'4 ,20 r3 . /sal(`L_ L (.. C Name of CorpofII ation Signature 3 Rctd,fa At 70,M4 c d L Address Title ViC56•W D 7 '7/ c'O Signature Tax Statement Mailing Address(if different from above) Title • STATE OF OREGON ) )ss. County of Washington ) /� / This instrument was acknowledged before me on /'/- �f' �, (date)by .�'�GLG-�-1'-' / -)dt (name(s)of person(s))as (type of authority,e.g.,officer,trustee,etc.) of �:'�7� G � (name of party on behalf of whom instrument was executed). OFFICIAL SEAL II ' 8ANDREA R. BRAVVEL CAM.-";j7. 1 COT NOTARY PUBLIC-OREGON -- Notry's Signature MISSION N0.344596 MY COMMISSION EXPIRES MAY 18,2005 , My Commission Expires: :�S • Accepted on behalf of the City of Tigard this 2-0-o"� day.of Mdi re-L_ ,20 0`f City Engineer I:1ENG1Pubik:AxmiDedcationDeedROW-Corp.dot . iil I II 111111111111111 iiiii ! Exhibit A The eastern 5 feet of Lot 21 Hermoso Park Subdivision parallel to the existing Hermoso Way right-of-way, as indicated in the sketch below, and as recorded on October 10, 1955, in Book 16, Page 48, Washington County. _ N .._.. e Tv 1. 64 � �YKY I .00 N84^2G'W ears "R 1 A b .ut. ,vu • .vo y\ N S 0 0 ry0 44.0 { D Right-of-way 44.1!, b 4 q "$:'y �d Y41 t4w'P ?It ' wb Dedication b i, ,y, ,r' _:a1 O `oa 7•4., ' MERMpgp — _��� :arc� .. . N04'LL'w Lr/! �i4 , .a 4.3— �a.K,R,.;.,,, WAY _ ...;51,..-:>, c 11 . t y 2! t0 11 y `12_` u vO,,vr l':::441t‘I 1 8/ i c� r mac 14 4::".::::.....„.4,1, ,L•f∎L ,M 23 3 .aa —^n.. .k l S.� S :lo.,,,.• ..e 0,` Oar^4e.„ �vw`r:ia.�,-. "0 1°, Ti -T1 2. tc•w t crc yr.c o I 4 0 t } !io ,.p �,,o se e.s-.as;°e 17 16 0 8EV£iAND �» z' I'pq�v:f: _*. 1Qi)1 2S y 2S r) u:. ' 28 a 29+YO.an as 0s /20.4.4 2 2a.re ..r % 9 eJ.9 1 �- ^,Are! !'.'slriel Mt 23 to Nrn R}.r D4rd BY..c.7a., s opo 1.4 it Conditions Associated With TIDEMARK Case #: SDR2003-00008 COMPUTER SYSTEMS, INC. Condition Status Updated Code Title Hold Status Changed By Tag Date By 1 FENCE SIZE/LANDSCAPE TYPE None Met 12/17/03 MAS 12/18/03 PLL 21. Provide information regarding the size of the fence and type of landscaping to be used to screen the proposed refuse container. 1 FRANCHISE HAULER APPROVAL None Met MAS 1/5/04 MAS 22. Provide documentation that the franchise hauler for the area is satisfied that the design of the refuse container area is compatible with waste pick up practices. 1 INTERNAL PARKING STALLS STOPS None Met 12/17/03 MAS 12/18/03 PLL 23. The applicant is required to provide all internal parking stalls along the proposed sidewalk with wheel stops. 1 BICYCLE RACK None Met 12/17/03 MAS 12/18/03 PLL 24. Provide a 4-stall bicycle rack within 50 feet of the west entrance. 1 BICYCLE RACK DIRECTIONAL SIGNS None Met 1/20/04 MAS 1/20/04 PLN 25. Provide directional signs back to the required bicycle rack. 1 BICYCLE RACK DETAILS None Met 1/20/04 MAS 1/20/04 PLN 26. Submit details of the bicycle rack to be used. 1 BUILDING SETBACK/HERMOSA WAY None Met 12/17/03 MAS 12/18/03 PLL 1. Provide a plan showing the proposed building to be setback from SW Hermoso Way no greater than 10 feet and construct accordingly. 1 FRONT FACADE MINIMUM AREAS None Met 12/17/03 MAS 12/18/03 PLL 2. Provide a plan showing the front facade to include a minimum of 50 percent ground floor windows,display areas,or doorway openings and construct accordingly. • 1 RED MAPLE PLANTINGS None Met 12/17/03 MAS 12/18/03 PLL 3. Submit information indicating that the Red Maples to be planted within the front yard setback will be a minimum of three and a half inch caliper and plant accordingly. 1 CITY OF TIGARD SIGN APPLICATION None NOT MET MAS 12/18/03 SJR 4. Provide sign dimensions,plans,and a City of Tigard sign application to the Planning Technicians at the planning counter located in City Hall,for the proposed wall sign. 1 SIGN DISTANCE CERTIFICATION None Met MAS 1/5/04 MAS 5. The applicant's engineer shall provide a pre-construction sight distance certification and/or correct existing deficiencies. 1 PROPOSED PARKING LOT None Met 12/17/03 MAS 12/18/03 PLL 6. Provide a plan showing the proposed parking lot with a minimum of 19 parking stalls and construct accordingly. 1 TREE PROTECTION MEASURES PLAN None Met MAS 1/5/04 MAS 7. Prior to site work,the applicant must install all tree protection measures and contact the City's Forester and a member of the Planning Staff for sign-off. 1 SECURE PFI PERMIT None NOT MET KSM 12/18/03 SJR 8. Prior to issuance of a site permit,a Public Facility Improvement(PFI)permit is required for this project to cover the half-street improvements in Hermoso Way and any other work in the public right-of-way(ROW). Eight(8)sets of detailed public improvement plans shall be submitted for review to the Engineering Department. NOTE: these plans are in addition to any drawings required by the Building Division and should only include sheets relevant to public improvements. Public Facility Improvement(PFI)permit plans shall conform to City of Tigard Public Improvement Design Standards,which are available at City Hall and the City's web page(www.ci.tigard.or.us). Page 3 of 3 CaseConditions..rpt 12'8/2003 15: 17 5036256179 PRIDE DISPOSAI flOMPM PAGE 02 '03 lii -itr Fr lir * E DISPOSAL COMPANY P.O. Box 820 Sherwood,OR 97140 Phone: (503) 625-617 Fax: (503)625-6179 December 12, 2003 Mike Kezeor Gray Purcell 11445 SW Tiedeman Avenue Tigard, OR 97223 RE: Minuteman Press Dear Mike, I have reviewed the partial site plan that was faxed to me by Rory Antis for the Minuteman Press construction project. The enclosure for trash and recycle meets our dimension recommendations of 20' x 10', with a full opening gate for the 20' front. It is also my understanding that the vertical clearance minimum that we require, of 18' will not be a problem with the existing trees on site. If you have any additional questions, please feel free to contact me. Sincerely, Julia Fletcher Commercial Sales /Public Relations 503-625-6177 ex 170 13. The applicant shall submit construction plans to the Engineering Department as a part of the Public Facility Improvement permit, which indicate that they will construct a half-street improvement along the frontage of SW Hermoso Way. The improvements adjacent to this site shall include: A. City standard pavement section for a local street from curb to centerline equal to 18 feet; B. pavement tapers needed to tie the new improvement back into the existing edge of pavement shall be built beyond the site frontage; C. concrete curb, or curb and gutter as needed; D. storm drainage, including any off-site storm drainage necessary to convey surface and/or subsurface runoff; E. 6 foot concrete sidewalk with a planter strip; F. street trees in the planter strip spaced per TDC requirements; G. street striping; H. streetlight layout by applicant's engineer, to be approved by City Engineer; underground utilities; J. street signs (if applicable); K. driveway apron (if applicable); and L. adjustments in vertical and/or horizontal alignment to construct SW Hermoso Way in a safe manner, as approved by the Engineering Department. 14. A profile of Hermoso Way shall be required, extending 300 feet either side of the subject site showing the existing grade and proposed future grade. 15. The applicant shall obtain approval from the Tualatin Valley Water District (TVWD) for the proposed water connection prior to issuance of the City's Public Facility Improvement permit. 16. The applicant shall provide an on-site water quality facility as required by Clean Water Services Design and Construction Standards (adopted by Resolution and Order No. 00-7). Final plans and calculations shall be submitted to the Engineering Department (Kim McMillan) for review and approval prior to issuance of the site permit. In addition, a proposed maintenance plan shall be submitted along with the plans and calculations for review and approval. 17. The applicant's water quality/quantity facility shall include design of the 2, 10 and 25 year storms. The plans shall also include the engineer's proposed revisions to the outfall, as outlined in his correspondence dated 10/04/03. 18. An erosion control plan shall be provided as part of the Public Facility Improvement (PFI) permit drawings. The plan shall conform to the "Erosion Prevention and Sediment Control Design and Planning Manual, February 2003 edition." 19. Prior to issuance of the site permit, the applicant shall pay the current assessment for this site as it pertains to Sewer Reimbursement District No. 15. STAFF CONTACT: Greg Berry, Utility Engineer, (503) 639-4171, ext. 2468. 20. The applicant's PFI submittal shall include the extension of the public storm sewer in Hermoso Way. THE FOLLOWING CONDITIONS SHALL BE SATISFIED PRIOR TO A FINAL BUILDING INSPECTION: Submit to the Planning Department (Mathew Scheidegger, 639-4171, ext. 2437) for review and approval: 21 . Provide information regarding the size of the fence and type of landscaping to be used to screen the proposed refuse container. 22. Provide documentation that the franchise hauler for the area is satisfied that the design of the refuse container area is compatible with waste pick up practices. NOTICE OF TYPE II DECISION SDR2003-00008/MINUTEMAN PRESS PAGE 3 OF 28 12/12/03 14:43 FAX 503 639 6130 0]003 12f11f2603 15: 03 50362561" PRIDE DISPOSAL r--4PM PAGE 02/03 • RECEIVED DEC 12 2DH ■ r *1011* E CITY BUILDING Div!sir^ DISPOSAL COMPANY P.O.Box 820 Sherwood,OR 97140 Phone: (503) 625-617 Fax: (503)625-6179 December 12, 2003 Mike Kezeor Gray Purcell 11445 SW Tiedeman Avenue Tigard, OR 97223 RE: Minuteman Press Dear Mike, I have reviewed the partial site plan that was faxed to me by Rory Antis for the Minuteman Press construction project. The enclosure for trash and recycle meets our dimension recommendations of 20' x 10', with a full opening gate for the 20' front. It is also my understanding that the vertical clearance minimum that we require, of 18' will not be a problem with the existing trees on site. If you have any additional questions, please feel free to contact me. Sincerely, Julia Fletcher Commercial Sales / Public Relations 503-625-6177 ex 170 12/12/03 14:43 FAX 503 639 6130 0 004 12/11/2003 15:03 50362561 PRIDE DISPOSAL ' 'PM PAGE 03/03 19/11v/2003 15;21 50353B06i� R❑RY ANTIS DESIGN PACE 02 z___ 1 z W w 15 r CC l' . 1 7.712.‘ liern CI -`•11114--■■.' . .....„„. ill .:n 91 iiii 3...0 .a 7.'CI'---.7T.;-amiwa.----.I.' --7:--..-=7-_ 7-4---"--. __ ___--"- mitriu MIMI \ ♦ 1 1 r .4N'"1 7 Z i Ph N S. 0123 „, S. ►g. /: al■ , '\ \ i in • vy'`/;id,: tgry.' 1\\ 1 ir l gitioik _ iii.. .1.•'+'':•l.• ■'.. ..11,-1- '%..4 11 1"r '417114.-- 113 I r ...,, P.7.7 ,I t cm ir N. 9^ ii f 1 ',0'.0 L e®,1' Ill•,fl ' ,6 • 9b'ds s I i . 9 VI P�ee_ep d - VI"I 0- y_ 1s o cU ► � :a F c.)-.er- m ti ....., \.,. In O; 1 1. / i 1/21/04 Conditions Associated With 8:34:55AM • TIDEMARK Case #: SDR2003-00008 COMPUTER SYSTEMS, INC. Condition Status Updated ('ode Title Hold Status Changed By Tag Date By 1 FENCE SIZE/LANDSCAPE TYPE None Met 12/17/03 MAS 12/18/03 PLL 21. Provide information regarding the size of the fence and type of landscaping to be used to screen the proposed refuse container. 1 FRANCHISE HAULER APPROVAL None Met MAS 1/5/04 MAS 22. Provide documentation that the franchise hauler for the area is satisfied that the design of the refuse container area is compatible with waste pick up practices. 1 INTERNAL PARKING STALLS STOPS None Met 12/17/03 MAS 12/18/03 PLL 23. The applicant is required to provide all internal parking stalls along the proposed sidewalk with wheel stops. 1 BICYCLE RACK None Met 12/17/03 MAS 12/18/03 PLL 24. Provide a 4-stall bicycle rack within 50 feet of the west entrance. 1 BICYCLE RACK DIRECTIONAL SIGNS None Met 1/20/04 MAS 1/20/04 PLN 25. Provide directional signs back to the required bicycle rack. 1 BICYCLE RACK DETAILS None Met 1/20/04 MAS 1/20/04 PLN 26. Submit details of the bicycle rack to be used. 1 BUILDING SETBACK/HERMOSA WAY None Met 12/17/03 MAS 12/18/03 PLL 1. Provide a plan showing the proposed building to be setback from SW Hermoso Way no greater than 10 feet and construct accordingly. 1 FRONT FACADE MINIMUM AREAS None Met 12/17/03 MAS 12/18/03 PLL 2. Provide a plan showing the front facade to include a minimum of 50 percent ground floor windows,display areas,or doorway openings and construct accordingly. 1 RED MAPLE PLANTINGS None Met 12/17/03 MAS 12/18/03 PLL 3. Submit information indicating that the Red Maples to be planted within the front yard setback will be a minimum of three and a half inch caliper and plant accordingly. 1 CITY OF TIGARD SIGN APPLICATION None NOT MET MAS 12/18/03 SJR 4. Provide sign dimensions,plans,and a City of Tigard sign application to the Planning Technicians at the planning counter located in City Hall,for the proposed wall sign. 1 SIGN DISTANCE CERTIFICATION None Met MAS 1/5/04 MAS 5. The applicant's engineer shall provide a pre-construction sight distance certification and/or correct existing deficiencies. 1 PROPOSED PARKING LOT None Met 12/17/03 MAS 12/18/03 PLL 6. Provide a plan showing the proposed parking lot with a minimum of 19 parking stalls and construct accordingly. 1 TREE PROTECTION MEASURES PLAN None Met MAS 1/5/04 MAS 7. Prior to site work,the applicant must install all tree protection measures and contact the City's Forester and a member of the Planning Staff for sign-off. 1 SECURE PFI PERMIT None NOT MET KSM 12/18/03 SJR 8. Prior to issuance of a site permit,a Public Facility Improvement(PFI)permit is required for this project to cover the half-street improvements in Hermoso Way and any other work in the public right-of-way(ROW). Eight(8)sets of detailed public improvement plans shall be submitted for review to the Engineering Department. NOTE:these plans are in addition to any drawings required by the Building Division and should only include sheets relevant to public improvements. Public Facility Improvement(PFI)permit plans shall conform to City of Tigard Public Improvement Design Standards,which are available at City Hall and the City's web page(www.ci.tigard.or.us). Page 3 of 3 CaseConditions..rpt Washington County,Oregon 2004-083281 TRAFFIC IMPACT FEE 17/20/2004 03:00:29 PM O-t- Cnt■1 Stn■19 K BARNEY Installment Payment App S5.00$11.00-Total a$16.00 Return Recorded Document to: City Hall Records Department Mill 10111 I 1111 I II 111111111111 I II City of Tigard 00621701200400832800010019 13125 SW Hall Blvd. I,Jerry Hanson,Director of Assessment and Taxation /fF�'�!! 7X�, and Oregon,do he eb certify Clerk for tVVuMngtns County, , i ,•:' Tigard OR 97223 or•gon,tlo hereby eertly thrt the within Instrument of .,•. -,. writing was received and recorded In�book of ' .f�,ry_ 4 records of said county. •0. sOr Ctlf Jerry R.Hanson,Director ssessmint and Taxation, '4.....1".)1v..,' In The Matter of the Traffic Impact Fee for Minuteman Press Ex-Officio County Clerk Tax Map 25101 AB Lot Number(s) 01501 And as further described in Deed# Building Permit# BUP 2003-00681 Site Address 7555 SW Hermosa Way Subdivision n/a Case File# SDR 2003-00008 TIF Land Use District Tigard To Be Billed To: Lionel LLC Address: 14285 SW Pacific Highway Tigard OR 97224 To The City of Tigard: In accordance with the provision of Oregon Revised Statute 223.208 and Washington County Ordinance No. 379 which relates to the imposition of a traffic\ impact fee for the financing of major collector roads and arterials of Washington County, I/we HEREBY MAKE APPLICATION AND AGREE,JOINTLY AND SEVERALLY,to pay my/our traffic impact fee,as has been determined by Washington County Ordinance No. 379 in Twenty(20)semi-annual installments of the amount financed together with one-half of one year's interest thereon at a rate of 6.750 annual percentage rate on the unpaid amount owed. The lien date is the first day of the month following the date the application is signed. The first payment is due six months thereafter and at six(6)month intervals thereafter for a period of ten (10) years. Each installment payment will include principal and interest. If I/we neglect or refuse to pay any part of the installments provided herein,including interest,within one(1)year after the same shall have become due and payable,then the whole amount of the unpaid assessment shall become due and payable at once and shall be collected in the manner provided by law including foreclosure on the above-mentioned real property. The traffic impact fee,annual percentage rate of interest(6.75%)and finance charges which I/we agree to pay are as follow: HIGHWAY TRANSIT 1) Amount of Traffic Impact Fee $23,220.00 $ 1,944.00 2) Amount of Financed $23,220.00 $ 1,944.00 3) Equal Semi-Annual Principal Payments 20(Twenty) 4) Interest on Balance at Rate of 6.75% I/we understand that the amount owed,as stated above,shall be a lien on the above-described subject property pursuant to Washington County Ordinance No.379 Section 6(D)and ORS 223.230. DATED this Fi0 day of (.7a ,200 // J . / Signature of Property Owner(s) Signa e of Property Owner(s) STATE OF OREGON ) Name(Please Print): 6(1e R3s County of Washington ) Address: wt.. \ • ,0 e �3 SUBSCRIBED AS SWORN TO BEFORE me this day of June_, '200 4 • Notar .licForOregon f"ar�, OFFICIAL SEAL D I— � ' SUE ROSS My Commission Expires: I�— COMMISS ON NO.3 751052 MY COMMISSION EXPIRES DEC.1,2007 z../ 1 ii ( 3 " 111 1, H s 6 7 oii 011 Ql - 0 e 11.11[41141t)1 ' � u rgi ytretli irik/ �nr tr.9orlcercl.rcoi�i�Aic;ecocaco ic,4.c.crioi F r��bfit;� r R ;1�r;e?II ()f Q,RQigrdd 0- :'Qa,b 4 LW.181:ohl o Co( WAY dl(•A1113,-O �9/223 1k)M (t) )62l16203_- 1-AX(tJ3)620-5503 October 29, 2004 .1111111i/ CITY OF TIGARD z��`� OREGON Minuteman Press �r �i� Attn: Robert Davidson 7545 SW Hermoso Way Tigard, OR 97223 RE: Minuteman Press SDR2003-00008 Landscape/ Letter of Credit Release This letter serves as written acknowledgment that the City of Tigard has no further interest in the Twenty Thousand Twenty Three Dollar($20,023.00) landscape credit #3500004 between Robert C. Davidson and Jeff Tainer and the City of Tigard, Oregon. All work under this assurance is satisfactorily complete. If you have any questions regarding this matter, please contact Mathew Scheidegger, Associate Planner at 503-639-4171 ext. 2437. Sincerely, "M„,‘,7 f r__ Mathew Scheidegger Associate Planner City of Tigard 13125 SW Hall Blvd., Tigard, OR 97223 (503)639-4171 TDD(503)684-2772