The URL can be used to link to this page

SDR2002-00017 SDR2002 - 00017 CASH AND CARRY STORES NOTICE OF TYPE II DECISION SITE DEVELOPMENT REVIEW (SDR) 2002-00017 CITY OF T1 TIGARD CASH AND CARRY STORES Community .SkapingA Better Community 120 DAYS = 4/15/2003 SECTION I. APPLICATION SUMMARY FILE NAME: CASH AND CARRY STORES CASE NO.: Site Development Review (SDR) SDR2002-00017 PROPOSAL: The applicant is requesting Site Development Review approval to convert an existing 32,380 square foot building from a furniture store (bulk sales use) to a discount grocery store (retail sales use) and future retail tenant space. Apart from re-striping the parking lot and minor facade changes, no other alterations are proposed. OWNER: Monaghan Farms Attn: Tom Deline 14120 E. Evans Avenue Aurora, CO 80014 APPLICANT: Smart and Final Attn: Fernando Gallarzo 600 Citadel Drive Los Angeles, CA 90040 LOCATION: 11745 SW Pacific Highway; WCTM 1S136CD, Tax Lot 1000. ZONE: C-G: General Commercial District. The C-G zoning district is designed to accommodate a full range of retail, office and civic uses with a City-wide and even regional trade area. Except where non-conforming, residential uses are limited to single-family residences which are located on the same site as a permitted use. APPLICABLE REVIEW Community Development Code Chapters 18.360, 18.390, 18.520, CRITERIA: 18.705, 18.725, 18.745, 18.755, 18.765, 18.780, 18.795 and 18.810. SECTION II. DECISION Notice is hereby given that the City of Tigard Community Development Director's designee has APPROVED the above request subject to certain conditions of approval. The findings and conclusions on which the decision is based are noted in Section VI. NOTICE OF TYPE II DECISION SDR2002-00017/CASH AND CARRY STORES PAGE 1 OF 19 CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL THE FOLLOWING CONDITIONS SHALL BE SATISFIED PRIOR TO ISSUANCE OF A CERTIFICATE OF OCCUPANCY: Submit evidence of complying with the following conditions to the Planning Division. Staff contact: Morgan Tracy at 503-639-4171, ext. 2428. 1. The applicant/owner shall record a pedestrian access easement for a future pedestrian/bicycle connection to the abutting C-P zoned property to the north (presently described as WCTM 1S136CD, tax lots 401, 500, 1002). The easement shall be located in an area where a feasible connection can be made, considering topography, structures, and existing significant vegetation. This walkway need not be constructed, however, the easement must authorize the abutting property to construct the connecting walkway at the time Site Development Review occurs for that property. The owner shall retain the right to close this access; however, it shall remain open while business is being conducted on the subject parcel during normal business hours. 2. The applicant shall demonstrate that existing lighting is sufficient to illuminate a person along the pedestrian route connection to abutting properties, or shall install additional lighting to satisfy TDC 18.360.090(A)(10). 3. The applicant/owner shall acknowledge, in writing, their acceptance of this condition which requires that if ODOT approves a vehicular connection between the subject property and the property to the north, the two properties shall provide reciprocal easements and construct a vehicular connection when the property to the north develops. 4. Provide 10 bicycle parking stalls that meet the design requirements of Section 18.765.050(C) of the Tigard Development Code. Submit to the Engineering Department (Brian Rager, 639-4171, ext. 2471) for review and approval: 5. The applicant shall submit a suite layout map to the Engineering Department. If the applicant is not sure how many suites will be used, they must estimate a number. The City will then assign suite numbers and the address fee will then be calculated. The fee must be paid by the applicant prior to issuance of the building permit. (STAFF CONTACT: Shirley Treat, Engineering). THIS APPROVAL SHALL BE VALID FOR EIGHTEEN (18) MONTHS FROM THE EFFECTIVE DATE OF THIS DECISION. SECTION III. BACKGROUND INFORMATION Site History: The subject property received Site Development Review approval for development of the Sear's Home Life Furniture Store on May 13, 1994 (SDR94-00006). The approval included the existing 32,380 square foot building, parking, landscaping and other site improvements. In 2001 the bulk sales tenant moved out of the building. Vicinity Information: The subject site is located on the north side of SW Pacific Highway, east of Highway 217 and is located behind the Chevron Gas Station. Site Information and Proposal Description: In August of 2002, Smart and Final applied for a minor modification to re-stripe the parking lot to provide the increased parking required for a retail sales use. During the review of that minor modification request, it was found that the trip generation would exceed an increase of 100 vehicle trips per day. As such, the minor modification could not be approved, and the site would require a major modification review. The applicant completed their Major Modification application submittal on December 6, 2002. This decision reflects that revised application. NOTICE OF TYPE II DECISION SDR2002-00017/CASH AND CARRY STORES PAGE 2 OF 19 The applicant is requesting Site Development Review approval to convert an existing 32,380 square foot building from a furniture store (bulk sales use) to a discount grocery store (retail sales use) and future retail tenant space. Apart from re-striping the parking lot and minor façade changes, no other alterations are proposed. SECTION IV. COMMENTS FROM PROPERTY OWNERS WITHIN 500 FEET Staff received one phone call from a nearby owner, inquiring about the nature of the business, but had no specific concerns. One letter was received from Mr. Ed Christensen, of Welkin Engineering, P.C., regarding the level of information provided in the applicant's application, the lack of a joint access, and off site traffic improvement needs. With regard to the level of detail provided in the applicant's application, staff agrees that the level of detail provided is not exhaustive. However, in consideration of the proposed development and the lack of physical changes that were being proposed, staff is comfortable utilizing the majority of findings from the original approval in 1994. The applicant has addressed in a cursory form, the required sections of the development code, and has offered a trip generation study to determine the level of impact with regard to the transportation system. The joint access issue is discussed in greater detail under Section 18.705, Access. With regard to off site traffic improvements, Mr. Christensen notes "Because of the increased additional traffic resulting from this change in use, the intersection at Dartmouth/78t and Highway 99 shomild be reviewed for additional widening...lmprovements could include widening the 78 Avenue leg between Pfaffle and Highway 99, and re-striping the intersection." Staff notes that the project will result in an estimated additional 451 average daily trips; however, the impacts specific to the Dartmouth and Pacific Highway intersection are not anticipated to be significant based on the existing street network. The majority of the congestion at this intersection can be attributed to traffic from SW Hall Boulevard moving east along Pfaffle utilizing the left turn signal to travel north on Pacific Highway. It is very unlikely that vehicles will leave the Cash and Carry site heading south, turn north onto Hall Boulevard, turn again on Pfaffle to make a left turn onto Pacific Highway to head north, since the existing driveway already allows left turns onto Pacific Highway which has a refuge lane. Moreover, should a vehicular connection be established linking Pacific Highway with SW Pfafflt, the additional traffic would compound the traffic situation at either the Hall and Pfaffle or 78 and Pacific Highway intersections. The primary access to the subject site is from a separate driveway onto Pacific Highway that allows for the full range of turning movements. In addition, ODOT controls the intersection referenced by Welkin and did not recommend further analysis. Therefore, Staff maintains that the impact area for this development has been adequately addressed by all affected agencies, and no further analysis is necessary. Further, to impose a condition requiring an off site exaction, Nolan v. California Coastal Commission established that there be a nexus, or link, between the exaction required and the impact generated from the development. Since it has not been established that this project will contribute to an adverse impact on the Dartmouth/78th and Pacific Highway intersection, this off site improvement cannot be justified. SECTION V. SUMMARY OF APPLICABLE REVIEW CRITERIA A. Zoning Districts 18.520 (Commercial Zoning Districts) B. Applicable Development Code Standards 18.705 Access Egress and Circulation) 18.725 Environmental Performance Standards) 18.745 Landscaping and Screening) 18.755 Mixed Solid Waste and Recyclable Storage) 18.765 Off-Street parking and loading requirements) 18.780 Signs) 18.795 Visual Clearance) NOTICE OF TYPE II DECISION SDR2002-00017/CASH AND CARRY STORES PAGE 3 OF 19 C. Specific SDR Approval Criteria 18.360 D. Street and Utility Improvement Standards 18.810 E. Impact Study 18.390 SECTION VI. APPLICABLE DEVELOPMENT CODE STANDARDS A. ZONIING DISTRICT Commercial Zoning District: Section 18.520.020 Lists the description of the Commercial Zoning Districts. The site is located in the C-G: General Commercial District. Development Standards: Section 18.520.040.B States that Development standards in commercial zoning districts are contained in Table 18.520.2 below: TABLE 18.520.2 DEVELOPMENT STANDARDS IN COMMERCIAL Z_ONES r STANDARD C-G Proposed Minimum Lot Size None 113,256 sq. ft. - Detached unit - - Boarding, lodging, rooming house - Minimum Lot Width 50 ft 150 ft. Minimum Setbacks - Front yard 0 ft 80 ft. - Side facing street on corner & through lots - - - Side yard 0/20 ft. * 15'ft west/ 50 ft. east -- Rear yard 0/20 ft * 20 ft. - Distance between front of garage & property line. - - Maximum Height 45 ft. 27 ft. Maximum Site Coverage [2] 85% 80% Minimum Landscape Requirement 15% 20% * no setback shall be required except where the property abuts a residential zone, in which case, a minimum 20 foot setback applies As demonstrated in the table above, the applicant's plans comply with the dimensional standards of the C-G zone. FINDING: Based on the analysis above, the Development Standards criteria have been satisfied. B. APPLICABLE DEVELOPMENT CODE STANDARDS The Site development Review approval standards require that a development proposal be found to be consistent with the various standards of the Community Development Code. The applicable criteria in this case are Chapters 18.360, 18.390, 18.520, 18.705, 18.745, 18.755, 18.765, 18.775, 18.780, 18.790, 18.795, and 18.810. The proposal's consistency with these Code Chapters is reviewed in the following sections. NOTICE OF TYPE II DECISION SDR2002-00017/CASH AND CARRY STORES PAGE 4 OF 19 Access, Egress and Circulation (18.705): Access plan: No building or other permit shall be issued until scaled plans are presented and approved as provided by this chapter that show how access, egress and circulation requirements are to be fulfilled. The applicant shall submit a site plan. The Director shall provide the applicant with detailed information about this submission requirement. No change to the existing access is proposed. Currently the site is accessed by a single driveway connecting to SW Pacific Highway. Joint access: Owners of two or more uses, structures, or parcels of land may agree to utilize jointly the same access and egress when the combined access and egress of both uses, structures, or parcels of land satisfies the combined requirements as designated in this title, provided: Satisfactory legal evidence shall be presented in the form of deeds, easements, leases or contracts to establish the joint use; and copies of the deeds, easements, leases or contracts are placed on permanent file with the City. Access is pre-existing and already is jointly shared with the small retail center to the east. In addition, a crossover easement has been recorded as part of a prior approval to allow access to the gas station to the west. This easement will be utilized once the gas station is substantially modified. Section 18.705.030.H.1 states that an access report shall be submitted with all new development proposals which verifies design of driveways and streets are safe by meeting adequate stacking needs, sight distance and deceleration standards as set by ODOT, Washington County, the City and AASHTO. There is an existing full service driveway onto 99W for this site that has already been previously approved by ODOT. Pacific Highway (99W) is an ODOT facility and access reservations are controlled by ODOT. ODOT has reviewed this application and did not have concern with the continued use of the existing driveway. Section 18.705.030.H.2 states that driveways shall not be permitted to be placed in the influence area of collector or arterial street intersections. Influence area of intersections is that area where queues of traffic commonly form on approach to an intersection. The minimum driveway setback from a collector or arterial street intersection shall be150 feet, measured from the right-of-way line of the intersecting street to the throat of the proposed driveway. The setback may be greater depending upon the influence area, as determined from City Engineer review of a traffic impact report submitted by the applicant's traffic engineer. In a case where a project has less than 150 feet of street frontage, the applicant must explore any option for shared access with the adjacent parcel. If shared access is not possible or practical, the driveway shall be placed as far from the intersection as possible. The existing access onto 99W is approximately 600 feet from the intersection at Dartmouth/78th/99W, 425 feet from the Highway 217 off ramps, and approximately 175 feet from the beginning of the northbound Highway 217 onramp. Therefore, the existing access meets this criterion. Section 18.705.030.H.3 and 4 states that the minimum spacing of driveways and streets along a collector shall be 200 feet. The minimum spacing of driveways and streets along an arterial shall be 600 feet. The minimum spacing of local streets along a local street shall be 125 feet. The existing access onto 99W was previously approved by ODOT and continues to be acceptable to them for this use. NOTICE OF TYPE II DECISION SDR2002-00017/CASH AND CARRY STORES PAGE 5 OF 19 • Public street access: All vehicular access and egress as required in Sections 18.705.030H and 18.705.0301 shall connect directly with a public or private street approved by the City for public use and shall be maintained at the required standards on a continuous basis. The proposed building is accessible from SW Pacific Highway which is a public street that will be maintained as a public street. Curb cuts: Curb cuts shall be in accordance with Section 18.810.030N: Concrete curbs, curb cuts, wheelchair, bicycle ramps and driveway approaches shall be constructed in accordance with standards specified in this chapter and Section 15.04.080: Concrete curbs and driveway approaches are required; except where no sidewalk is planned, an asphalt approach may be constructed with City Engineer approval and Asphalt and concrete driveway approaches to the property line shall be built to City configuration standards. No driveway approach shall be less than five feet from the side property line projected except in cul-de-sacs, without approval and written permission of the city. The end slopes may encroach within the five foot restricted area. No portion of any driveway approach, including the end slopes, shall be located closer than thirty feet to an intersection street right-of-way line. Commercial or service drives shall not be more than thirty feet in width and if located on the same lot frontage shall be separated by a minimum length of curb of thirty feet. Each residential driveway shall be not more than twenty-six feet in width including end slopes, and if more than one driveway is to be constructed to serve the same lot, the frontage spacing between such driveways shall be not less than thirty feet measured along the curb line. Joint access driveways shall conform to the appropriate width standard for commercial or residential type usage. The driveway approach is pre-existing. Therefore, this standard does not apply. Walkways: On-site pedestrian walkways shall comply with the following standards: Walkways shall extend from the ground floor entrances or from the ground floor landing of stairs, ramps, or elevators of all commercial, institutional, and industrial uses, to the streets which provide the required access and egress. Walkways shall provide convenient connections between buildings in multi-building commercial, institutional, and industrial complexes. Unless impractical, walkways shall be constructed between new and existing developments and neighboring developments; Existing on-site pedestrian walkways connect the building to SW Pacific Highway. Wherever required walkways cross vehicle access driveways or parking lots, such crossings shall be designed and located for pedestrian safety . Required walkways shall be physically separated from motor vehicle traffic and parking by either a minimum 6-inch vertical separation (curbed) or a minimum 3-foot horizontal separation, except that pedestrian crossings of traffic aisles are permitted for distances no greater than 36 feet if appropriate landscaping, pavement markings, or contrasting pavement materials are used. Walkways shall be a minimum of four feet in width, exclusive of vehicle overhangs and obstructions such as mailboxes, benches, bicycle racks, and sign posts, and shall be in compliance with ADA standards; The existing walkway connection crosses the access aisles twice. Both crossings are less than 36 feet in length, and are striped to designate their location to drivers and pedestrians. Required walkways shall be paved with hard surfaced materials such as concrete, asphalt, stone, brick, etc. Walkways may be required to be lighted and/or signed as needed for safety purposes. Soft-surfaced public use pathways may be provided only if such pathways are provided in addition to required pathways. NOTICE OF TYPE II DECISION SDR2002-00017/CASH AND CARRY STORES PAGE 6 OF 19 The existing walkway is concrete with the exception of the parking areas which are hard surfaced asphalt. This standard is met. Minimum Access Requirements for Commercial and Industrial Use: Section 18.705.030.1 rovides the minimum access requirements for commercial and industrial uses: Table 18.705.3 indicates that the required access width for developments with 0-99 parking spaces is one 30-foot accesses with 24 feet of pavement. Vehicular access shall be provided to commercial or industrial uses, and shall be located to within 50 feet of the primary ground floor entrances; additional requirements for truck traffic may be placed as conditions of site development review. Access to the site is pre-existing and satisfies this standard. One-way vehicular access points: Where a proposed parking facility indicates only one-way traffic flow on the site, it shall be accommodated by a specific driveway serving the facility; the entrance drive shall be situated closest to oncoming traffic and the exit drive shall be situated farthest from oncoming traffic. The access drive is designed for two-way traffic. Therefore, this standard does not apply. The Director has the authority to restrict access when the need to do so is dictated by one or more of the following conditions: To provide for increased traffic movement on congested streets and to eliminate turning movement problems, the Director may restrict the location of driveways on streets and require the location of driveways be placed on adjacent streets, upon the finding that the proposed access would: • Cause or increase existing hazardous traffic conditions; or • Provide inadequate access for emergency vehicles; or • Cause hazardous conditions to exist which would constitute a clear and present danger to the public health, safety, and general welfare. To eliminate the need to use public streets for movements between commercial or industrial properties, parking areas shall be designed to connect with parking areas on adjacent properties unless not feasible. The Director shall require access easements between properties where necessary to provide for parking area connections; To facilitate pedestrian and bicycle traffic, access and parking area plans shall provide efficient sidewalk and/or pathway connections, as feasible, between neighboring developments or land uses; The access to the subject property is pre-existing and is not considered hazardous or as constituting a clear and present danger to the public health. Therefore, no access restriction is required. The parking area has already been designed to connect with abutting properties on SW Pacific Highway to reduce the need for additional driveway locations, and reduce the need for public street use between these developments. Mr. Ed Christensen, representing Welkin Engineering as an attendee of the applicant's neighborhood meeting, raised the prospect of providing a connection to the property to the north (fronting SW Pfaffle). However; as Pacific Highway is an ODOT road facility and is already overburdened with traffic, introducing additional traffic from SW Pfaffle could detrimentally impact the function of the existing access drive. Also, such a connection would provide an opportunity for cut through traffic from the arterial to the collector street, which is prohibited by TMC 10.32.245 "Crossing private Property. No operator of a vehicle shall proceed from one street to another street by crossing private property. This provision shall not apply to the operator of a vehicle who stops on the property for the purpose of procuring or providing goods or services." Connection of parking areas normally serves parking lots along the same street. Connections that serve two different streets can be detrimental to the capacity of these streets as in this case. This code section provides for connection between commercial properties to keep vehicles off public streets, not to encourage use of other NOTICE OF TYPE II DECISION SDR2002-00017/CASH AND CARRY STORES PAGE 7 OF 19 • streets and through movements. Staff finds that such a connection, as requested, could detrimentally affect existing traffic patterns and adversely affect both the existing driveway and Pacific Highway. Welkin cited 18.705 and stated that the 451 adptitional daily trips from this development will cause the eastbound lane of Pfaffle Street at 78 Avenue to back up even more than it does now at peak times. Welkin states that the City should require the applicant to provide a parking lot access connection between the subject site and the properties to the north that were approved by SDR 1999-00024 (Welkin) and SDR 2001-00010 (Cameron Plaza). Since primary access to the subject site is from the driveway on Pacific Highway, Staff is not convinced that the traffic on Pfaffle Street will experience significant growth as a result of this change of use. ODOT has reviewed this application and found that the proposed use is consistent with the previous use and the surrounding uses. Staff also spoke directly with ODOT staff to get their views on a parking lot connection, as there would be more traffic entering Pacific Highway through the site driveway. ODOT stated that the existing driveway onto Pacific Highway already serves two parcels that generate substantial traffic (the subject site and the adjacent Crossroads Shopping Center) and an easement is already in place•to serve the abutting Chevron Station upon substantial future modification of that site. ODOT is not in favor of increasing the use of that driveway to serve two additional parcels. Therefore, Staff recommends against a parking lot connection to the north. However, staff does not wish to preclude the possibility for a vehicular connection, should the issues related to cut through traffic, and impacts to the ODOT facility be resolved. If the applicant can receive authorization for a connection to the property(ies) on Pfaffle from ODOT, and present a design that will prevent cut through traffic to the satisfaction of the Planning Director, then staff would support this vehicle connection. This standard also speaks to the necessity for pedestrian and bicycle access between neighboring properties. Whereas a vehicular connection to additional properties on Pfaflle would have adverse impacts to the road facility and operation of the driveway, a pedestrian connection is not only feasible, but is warranted. There may be a security concern with a pedestrian connection as it would lead people to the side of and behind the existing building, where there are no windows for monitoring purposes. Therefore, the applicant may be allowed to close the connection after business hours. Also, the applicant will be required to install adequate lighting for security purposes along the pedestrian route. FINDING: Based on the analysis above, the Access, Egress and Circulation standards have not been met. CONDITION:The applicant/owner shall record a pedestrian access easement for a future pedestrian/bicycle connection to any one of the abutting C-P zoned properties. The easement shall be located in an area where a feasible connection can be made, considering topography, structures, and existing significant vegetation. This walkway need not be constructed, however, the easement must authorize the abutting property to construct the connecting walkway at the time Site Development Review occurs for that property. The owner shall retain the right to close this access; however, it shall remain open while business is being conducted on the subject parcel during normal business hours. Landscaping and Screening (18.745): Street Trees: Section 18.745.040 states that all development projects fronting on a public street or a private drive more than 100 feet in length shall be required to plant street trees in accordance with Section 18.745.040.0 Section 18.745.040.0 requires that street trees be spaced between 20 and 40 feet apart depending on the size classification of the tree at maturity (small, medium or large). Street trees are pre-existing along SW Pacific Highway. Therefore, this standard is met. NOTICE OF TYPE II DECISION SDR2002-00017/CASH AND CARRY STORES PAGE 8 OF 19 Buffering and Screening: Section 18.745.080 states that no buffer is required between abutting uses that are of a different type when the uses are separated by a street. No buffer is required between a proposed office use and existing office use. The subject site for the proposed development is adjacent to a C-P (Professional Commercial) zone. There is an existing non-conforming single family residence located to the northeast of the subject site. Existing buffering and screening material is already present along this shared property line. No other additional landscaping buffer is required. This standard is met. Screening: Special Provisions: Section 18.745.050.E requires the screening of parking and loading areas. Landscaped parking areas shall include special design features which effectively screen the parking lot areas from view. Planting materials to be installed should achieve a relative balance between low lying and vertical shrubbery and trees. Trees shall be planted in landscaped islands in all parking areas, and shall be equally distributed on the basis of one (1) tree for each seven (7) parking spaces in order to provide a canopy effect. The minimum dimension on the landscape islands shall be three (3) feet wide and the landscaping shall be protected from vehicular damage by some form of wheel guard or curb. Due to the configuration of the parking lot, only four parking spaces are visible from SW Pacific Highway. These have been screened by a combination of low lying shrubs and small trees. Parking lot trees have been planted per the prior land use approval and are in conformance with this standard. Screening Of Service Facilities: Except for one-family and two-family dwellings, any refuse container or disposal area and service facilities such as gas meters and air conditioners which would otherwise be visible from a public street, customer or resident parking area, any public facility or any residential area shall be screened from view by placement of a solid wood fence or masonry wall between five and eight feet in height. All refuse materials shall be contained within the screened area; Screening of Service Facilities is addressed under Chapter 18.755 (Mixed Solid Waste and Recyclable Storage). FINDING: Based on the analysis above, the landscaping and screening standards have been met. Mixed Solid Waste and Recyclables Storage (18.755): Chapter 18.755 requires that new construction incorporates functional and adequate space for on-site storage and efficient collection of mixed solid waste and source separated Recyclables prior to pick-up and removal by haulers. The applicant must choose one (1) of the following four (4) methods to demonstrate compliance: Minimum Standard, Waste Assessment, Comprehensive Recycling Plan, or Franchised Hauler Review and Sign-Off. The applicant will have to submit evidence or a plan which indicates compliance with this section. Regardless of which method chosen, the applicant will have to submit a written sign-off from the franchise hauler regarding the facility location and compatibility. The applicant's plans show the existing 200 square foot enclosure for trash and recycle dumpsters. Since no changes are being proposed to this enclosure and the property has received trash hauler service, this standard is met. Location Standards: To encourage its use, the storage area for source-separated recyclable shall be co- located with the storage area for residual mixed solid waste; Indoor and outdoor storage areas shall comply with Uniform Building and Fire Code requirements; Storage area space requirements can be satisfied with a single location or multiple locations, and can combine both interior and exterior locations; Exterior storage areas can be located within NOTICE OF TYPE II DECISION SDR2002-00017/CASH AND CARRY STORES PAGE 9 OF 19 interior side yard or rear yard areas. Exterior storage areas shall not be located within a required front yard setback or in a yard adjacent to a public or private street; Exterior storage areas shall be located in central and visible locations on a site to enhance security for users; Exterior storage areas can be located in a parking area, if the proposed use provides at least the minimum number of parking spaces required for the use after deducting the area used for storage. Storage areas shall be appropriately screened according to the provisions in 18.755.050 C, design standards; The storage area shall be accessible for collection vehicles and located so that the storage area will not obstruct pedestrian or vehicle traffic movement on the site or on public streets adjacent to the site. The refuse container facility on the proposed site is pre-existing and meets this standard. Design Standards: The dimensions of the storage area shall accommodate containers consistent with current methods of local collection; Storage containers shall meet Uniform Fire Code standards and be made and covered with waterproof materials or situated in a covered area; Exterior storage areas shall be enclosed by a sight-obscuring fence wall, or hedge at least six feet in height. Gate openings which allow access to users and haulers shall be provided. Gate openings for haulers shall be a minimum of 10 feet wide and shall be capable of being secured in a closed and open position; Storage area(s) and containers shall be clearly labeled to indicate the type of materials accepted. The refuse container facility on the proposed site is pre-existing and meets this standard. FINDING: Based on the analysis above, the Mixed Solid Waste/Recycling Storage Standards have been met. Off-Street Parking and Loading (18.765): Location of vehicle parking: Off-street parking spaces for single-family and duplex dwellings and single-family attached dwellings shall be located on the same lot with the dwellings. Off-street parking lots for uses not listed above shall be located not further than 200 feet from the building or use that they are required to serve, measured in a straight line from the building with the following exceptions: a) commercial and industrial uses which require more than 40 parking spaces may provide for the spaces in excess of the required first 40 spaces up to a distance of 300 feet from the primary site; The 40 parking spaces which remain on the primary site must be available for users in the following order of priority: 1) Disabled-accessible spaces; 2) Short-term spaces; 3) Long-term preferential carpool and vanpool spaces; 4) Long-term spaces. Based on the uses proposed with the tenant changes for the subject site, the parking requirement is 3.7 spaces per 1,000 gross square feet of floor area. Based on the 32,380 square foot building, the total required number of parking spaces is 120. The applicant has re- striped the parking lot to provide a total of 121 spaces, in compliance with this standard. Therefore, this standard has been met. Joint Parking: Owners of two or more uses, structures or parcels of land may agree to utilize jointly the same parking and loading spaces when the peak hours of operation do not overlay, subject to the following: 1) The size of the joint parking facility shall be at least as large as the number of vehicle parking spaces required by the larger(est) use per Section 18.765.070; 2) Satisfactory legal evidence shall be presented to the Director in the form of deeds, leases or contracts to establish the joint use; 3) If a joint use arrangement is subsequently terminated, or if the uses change, the requirements of this title thereafter apply to each separately. Joint parking is not proposed with this application. Therefore, this standard does not apply. NOTICE OF TYPE II DECISION SDR2002-00017/CASH AND CARRY STORES PAGE 10 OF 19 Parking in Mixed-Use Projects: In mixed-use projects, the required minimum vehicle parking shall be determined using the following formula. 1) Primary use, i.e. that with the largest proportion of total floor area within the development at 100% of the minimum vehicle parking required for that use in Section 18.765.060. 2) Secondary use, i.e., that with the second largest percentage of total floor area within the development, at 90% of the vehicle parking required-for that use in Section 18.765.060; 3) Subsequent use or uses, at 80% of the vehicle parking required for that use(s) in Section 18.765.060; 4) The maximum parking allowance shall be 150% of the total minimum parking as calculated in D.1.-3. above. The parking associated with the subject site is pre-existing and has been calculated at 100 percent of the total square footage of all buildings on the site. Therefore, this standard does not apply. Visitor Parking in Multi-Family Residential Developments: Multi-dwelling units with more than 10 required parking spaces shall provide an additional 15% of vehicle parking spaces above the minimum required for the use of guests of residents of the complex. These spaces shall be centrally located or distributed throughout the development. Required bicycle parking facilities shall also be centrally located within or evenly distributed throughout the development. This project does not involve a multi-family use. Therefore, this standard does not apply. Preferential Long-Term CarpoolNanpool Parking: Parking lots providing in excess of 20 long-term parking spaces shall provide preferential long-term carpool and vanpool parking for employees, students and other regular visitors to the site. At least 5% of total long-term parking spaces shall be reserved for carpool/vanpool use. Preferential parking for carpools/vanpools shall be closer to the main entrances of the building than any other employee or student parking except parking spaces designated for use by the disabled. Preferential carpool/vanpool spaces shall be full-sized per requirements in Section 18.765.040N and shall be clearly designated for use only by carpools and vanpools between 7:00 AM and 5:30 PM Monday through Friday. The subject site is predominantly a commercial retail site, and not an office use with long term parking. Therefore, due to the short duration of time that customers visit the site, the associated parking stalls are not considered "long-term". Therefore, this criterion does not apply. Disabled-Accessible Parking: All parking areas shall be provided with the required number of parking spaces for disabled persons as specified by the State of Oregon Uniform Building Code and federal standards. Such parking spaces shall be sized, signed and marked as required by these regulations. The subject parking area has a total of 121 parking stalls, 5 of which are ADA compliant. According to ADA standards, parking lots with 100 to 200 parking stalls must provide 5 ADA accessible stalls with one of those being van accessible. This standard has been met. Access Drives: With regard to access to public streets from off-street parking: access drives from the street to off-street parking or loading areas shall be designed and constructed to facilitate the flow of traffic and provide maximum safety for pedestrian and vehicular traffic on the site the number and size of access drives shall be in accordance with the requirements of Chapter, 18.705 Access Egress and Circulation; access drives shall be clearly and permanently marked and defined through use of rails, fences, walls or other barriers or markers on frontage not occupied by service drives; access drives shall have a minimum vision clearance in accordance with Chapter 18.795, Visual Clearance; access drives shall be improved with an asphalt or concrete surface; and excludin single-family and duplex residences, except as provided by Subsection 18.810.030.F, groups of two or more parking spaces shall be served by a service drive so that no backing movements or other maneuvering within a street or other public right-of-way will be required. NOTICE OF TYPE II DECISION SDR2002-00017/CASH AND CARRY STORES PAGE 11 OF 19 • The access drive has been addressed previously in this decision under Chapter 18.705 (Access Egress and Circulation). Pedestrian Access: Pedestrian access through parking lots shall be provided in accordance with Section 18.705.030.F. Where a parking area or other vehicle area has a drop-off grade separation, the property owner shall install a wall, railing, or other barrier which will prevent a slow-moving vehicle or driverless vehicle from escaping such area and which will prevent pedestrians from walking over drop-off edges. Pedestrian access has been discussed previously in this decision under Chapter 18.705 (Access Egress and Circulation). Parking Lot Striping: Except for single-family and duplex residences, any area intended to be used to meet the off-street parking requirements as contained in this Chapter shall have all parking spaces clearly marked; and all interior drives and access aisles shall be clearly marked and signed to show direction of flow and maintain vehicular and pedestrian safety. The plans submitted show the parking stalls to be clearly marked with striping. Therefore, this standard has been satisfied. Wheel Stops: Parking spaces along the boundaries of a parking lot or adjacent to interior landscaped areas or sidewalks shall be provided with a wheel stop at least four inches high located three feet back from the front of the parking stall. The front three feet of the parking stall may be concrete, asphalt or low lying landscape material that does not exceed the height of the wheel stop. This area cannot be calculated to meet landscaping or sidewalk requirements. Wheel stops and/or curbing has been provided for all parking spaces. Space and Aisle Dimensions: Section 18.765.040.N states that: "except as modified for angled parking in Figures 18.765.1 and 18.765.2 the minimum dimensions for parking spaces are: 8.5 feet x 18.5 feet for a standard space and 7.5 feet x 16.5 feet for a compact space; aisles accommodating two direction traffic, or allowing access from both ends, shall be 24 feet in width. The applicant's plans indicate that the parking stalls associated with the proposed buildings will meet the minimum dimensions for standard parking stalls. Therefore, this standard has been satisfied. Bicycle Parking Location and Access: Section 18.765.050 states bicycle parking areas shall be provided at locations within 50 feet of primary entrances to structures; bicycle parking areas shall not be located within parking aisles, landscape areas or pedestrian ways; outdoor bicycle parking shall be visible from on-site buildings and/or the street. When the bicycle parking area is not visible from the street, directional signs shall be used to located the parking area; and bicycle parking may be located inside a building on a floor which has an outdoor entrance open for use and floor location which does not require the bicyclist to use stairs to gain access to the space. Exceptions may be made to the latter requirement for parking on upper stories within a multi-story residential building. Based on the proposed uses of the subject property, the Tigard Development Code requires 0.3 spaces per 1,000 gross square feet. This equates to 10 bicycle spaces. The applicant has not requested an adjustment to reduce this number. No indication has been made as to whether bicycle spaces are existing or are planned, therefore a condition shall be imposed to assure compliance with this standard. NOTICE OF TYPE II DECISION SDR2002-00017/CASH AND CARRY STORES PAGE 12 OF 19 Bicycle Parking Design Requirements: Section 18.765.050.C. The following design requirements apply to the installation of bicycle racks: The racks required for required bicycle parking spaces shall ensure that bicycles may be securely locked to them without undue inconvenience. Provision of bicycle lockers for long-term (employee) parking is encouraged but not required; bicycle racks must be securely anchored to the ground, wall or other structure; bicycle parking spaces shall be at least 21/2 feet by six feet long, and, when covered, with a vertical clearance of seven feet. An access aisle of at least five feet wide shall be provided and maintained beside or between each row of bicycle parking; each required bicycle parking space must be accessible without moving another bicycle; required bicycle parking spaces may not be rented or leased except where required motor vehicle parking is rented or leased. At-cost or deposit fees for bicycle parking are exempt from this requirement; and areas set aside for required bicycle parking must be clearly reserved for bicycle parking only. Outdoor bicycle parking facilities shall be surfaced with a hard surfaced material, i.e., pavers, asphalt, concrete or similar material. This surface must be designed to remain well drained. The applicant has not provided a detail of the bike rack to be used; therefore, the applicant will be required to provide a plan that shows the required bicycle rack designed according to Section 18.765.050.C. of the Tigard Development Code. Minimum Bicycle Parking Requirements: The total number of required bicycle parking spaces for each use is specified in Table 18.765.2 in Section 18.765.070.H. In no case shall there be less than two bicycle parking spaces. Bicycle parking has been discussed and conditioned above. Therefore, this standard will be met. Minimum Off-Street Parking: Section 18.765.070.H states that the minimum and maximum parking shall be as required in Table 18.765.2. Minimum off-street parking has been addressed earlier in this section. Therefore, this standard has been met. Off-Street Loading Spaces: Commercial, industrial and institutional buildings or structures to be built or altered which receive and distribute material or merchandise by truck shall provide and maintain off-street loading and maneuvering space as follows: A minimum of one loading space is required for buildings with 10,000 gross square feet or more; A minimum of two loading spaces for buildings with 40,000 gross square feet or more. The building is 32,380 square feet and will be split into two tenant areas. The primary use will be 22,608 square feet and is provided with a loading area on the west side of the building. The second tenant space is 9,772 square feet. Therefore, this standard is met. FINDING: Based on the analysis above, the off-street parking and loading standards have not been fully met, however, if the applicant complies with the conditions listed below, the standards will be fully met: CONDITION:Provide 10 bicycle parking stalls that meet the design requirements of Section 18.765.050.C. of the Tigard Development Code. Signs (18.780): Chapter 18.780.130.D lists the type of allowable signs and sign area permitted in the C-G Zoning District. Signs are reviewed through a separate permit process administered by the Development Services Technicians. Sign permits have already been issued for the proposed use and comply with the requirements of the code. NOTICE OF TYPE II DECISION SDR2002-00017/CASH AND CARRY STORES PAGE 13 OF 19 • FINDING: Because signs have been reviewed and approved as part of a separate permit process, this standard has been satisfied. Tree Removal (18.790): Section 18.790.030 requires that a tree plan for the planting, removal and protection of trees prepared by a certified arborist shall be provided with a site development review application. The tree plan shall include identification of all existing trees, identification of a program to save existing trees or mitigate tree removal over 12 inches in caliper, which trees are to be removed, protection program defining standards and methods that will be used by the applicant to protect trees during and after construction. No trees are proposed to be removed by the applicant. As no exterior construction is proposed, no tree protection plan is required either. FINDING: Based on the analysis above, the tree removal standards have been met. Visual Clearance Areas (18.795): Chapter 18.795 requires that a clear vision area shall be maintained on the corners of all property adjacent to intersecting right-of-ways or the intersection of a public street and a private driveway. A clear vision area shall contain no vehicle, hedge, planting, fence, wall structure, or temporary or permanent obstruction exceeding three (3) feet in height. The code provides that obstructions that may be located in this area shall be visually clear between three (3) and eight (8) feet in height (8) (trees may be placed within this area provided that all branches below eight (8) feet are removed). A visual clearance area is the triangular area formed by measuring a 30-foot distance along the street right- of-way and the driveway, and then connecting these two (2), 30-foot distance points with a straight line. No modifications to the visual clearance at the access points of the site are being proposed with this application. Therefore, this standard is met. FINDING: Based on the analysis above, the vision clearance standards have been met. C. SPECIFIC SITE DEVELOPMENT REVIEW APPROVAL STANDARDS Section 18.360.090(A)(2) through 18.360.090(A)(15) provides additional Site Development Review approval standards not necessarily covered by the provisions of the previously listed sections. These additional standards are addressed immediately below with the following exceptions: The proposal contains no elements related to the provisions of the following and are, therefore, found to be inapplicable as approval standards: 18.360.090.3 (Residential Exterior Elevations); 18.360.090.5 (Privacy and Noise: Multi-family or Group Living Uses); 18.360.090.6 (Private Outdoor Areas: Multi-family Use); 18.360.090.7 (Shared Outdoor Recreation Areas: Multi-family Use); 18.360.090.8 (100-year floodplain); and 18.360.090.9 (Demarcation of Spaces). The following sections were discussed previously in this decision and, therefore, will not be addressed in this section: 18.360.090.4 (Buffering, Screening and Compatibility between Adjoining Uses); 18.360.090.13 (Parking); 18.360.090.14 (Landscaping); and 18.360.090.14 (Provisions for the Disabled). Relationship to the Natural and Physical Environment: Buildings shall be: located to preserve existing trees, topography and natural drainage where possible based upon existing site conditions; located in areas not subject to ground slumping or sliding; located to provide adequate distance between adjoining buildings for adequate light, air circulation, and fire-fighting; and oriented with consideration for sun and wind. Trees shall be preserved to the extent possible. Replacement of trees is subject to the requirements of Chapter 18.790, Tree Removal. NOTICE OF TYPE II DECISION SDR2002-00017/CASH AND CARRY STORES PAGE 14 OF 19 According to the applicant, the proposed building will have no impact on existing trees located on the site. Drainage is addressed later in this decision under Chapter 18.810 (Street and Utility Improvement Standards). The existing building has a minimum of 20 feet of buffering between it and the surrounding properties. No trees will be removed as part of this project. Therefore, this standard has been satisfied. Crime Prevention and Safety: • Windows shall be located so that areas vulnerable to crime can be surveyed by the occupants; • Interior laundry and service areas shall be located in a way that they can be observed by others; • Mail boxes shall be located in lighted areas having vehicular or pedestrian traffic; • The exterior lighting levels shall be selected and the angles shall be oriented towards areas vulnerable to crime; and • Light fixtures shall be provided in areas having heavy pedestrian or vehicular traffic and in potentially dangerous areas such as parking lots, stairs, ramps and abrupt grade changes. Fixtures shall be placed at a height so that light patterns overlap at a height of seven feet, which is sufficient to illuminate a person. According to the site plan, the front of the building is visible from the parking lot, and partially visible from SW Pacific Highway. Existing parking lot lighting is adequate. An earlier condition was imposed requiring a pedestrian connection to an abutting C-P zoned property. As the location of this connection is not yet known, existing lighting conditions cannot be assessed to determine if additional lighting is necessary. However, to ensure that this standard is satisfied, once the location of the easement has been determined, the applicant shall also be required to provide illumination which overlaps at a height of seven feet, sufficiently illuminating a person. FINDING: The crime prevention standards are not fully met. CONDITION: The applicant shall demonstrate that existing lighting is sufficient to illuminate a person along the pedestrian route connection to abutting properties, or shall install additional lighting to satisfy this standard. Public Transit: Provisions within the plan shall be included for providing for transit if the development proposal is adjacent to existing or proposed transit route; the requirements for transit facilities shall be based on: the location of other transit facilities in the area; and the size and type of the proposal. The following facilities may be required after City and Tri-Met review: bus stop shelters; turnouts for buses; and connecting paths to the shelters. The site has frontage on SW Pacific Highway, which is a Tri-Met transit route. However, transit facilities are pre-existing. Therefore, this standard does not apply. Provisions of the Underlying Zone: All of the provisions and regulations of the underlying zone shall apply unless modified by other sections or this title, e.g., Planned Developments, Chapter 18.350; or a variance or adjustment granted under Chapter 18.370. Dimensional Requirements: Provisions of the (C-G) General Commercial Zoning District have been addressed earlier in this decision under Section 18.510.040.B. FINDING: Based on the analysis above, the specific standards of the Site Development Review Section have been met. D. Street And Utility Improvements Standards (Section 18.810): Chapter 18.810 provides construction standards for the implementation of public and private facilities and utilities such as streets, sewers, and drainage. The applicable standards are addressed below: NOTICE OF TYPE II DECISION SDR2002-00017/CASH AND CARRY STORES PAGE 15 OF 19 • Streets: Improvements: Section 18.810.030.A.1 states that streets within a development and streets adjacent shall be improved in accordance with the TDC standards. Section 18.810.030.A.2 states that any new street or additional street width planned as a portion of an existing street shall be dedicated and improved in accordance with the TDC. Minimum Rights-of-Way and Street Widths: Section 18.810.030.E requires a arterial street to have a variable right-of-way width and three to seven lanes. Other improvements required may include on-street parking, sidewalks and bikeways, underground utilities, street lighting, storm drainage, and street trees. This site lies adjacent to SW Pacific Highway, which is classified as a five-lane arterial on the City of Tigard Transportation Plan Map. There is adequate ROW adjacent to this site at present, and the roadway is fully improved. No additional dedications or improvements will be required by ODOT. Sidewalks: Section 18.810.070.A requires that sidewalks be constructed to meet City design standards and be located on both sides of arterial, collector and local residential streets. There is a concrete sidewalk along Pacific Highway that meets this criterion. Sanitary Sewers: Sewers Required: Section 18.810.090.A requires that sanitary sewer be installed to serve each new development and to connect developments to existing mains in accordance with the provisions set forth in Design and Construction Standards for Sanitary and Surface Water Management (as adopted by Clean Water Services in 1996 and including any future revisions or amendments) and the adopted policies of the comprehensive plan. Over-sizing: Section 18.810.090.0 states that proposed sewer systems shall include consideration of additional development within the area as projected by the Comprehensive Plan. Sewer is provided by a main line in Pacific Highway. No additional public sewer line improvements are needed to support this development. Storm Drainage: General Provisions: Section 18.810.100.A states requires developers to make adequate provisions for storm water and flood water runoff. Accommodation of Upstream Drainage: Section 18.810.100.0 states that a culvert or other drainage facility shall be large enough to accommodate potential runoff from its entire upstream drainage area, whether inside or outside the development. The City Engineer shall approve the necessary size of the facility, based on the provisions of Design and Construction Standards for Sanitary and Surface Water Management (as adopted by Clean Water Services in 2000 and including any future revisions or amendments). There are no upstream public drainage ways that affect this site. Effect on Downstream Drainage: Section 18.810.100.D states that where it is anticipated by the City Engineer that the additional runoff resulting from the development will overload an existing drainage facility, the Director and Engineer shall withhold approval of the development until provisions have been made for improvement of the potential condition or until provisions have been made for storage NOTICE OF TYPE II DECISION SDR2002-00017/CASH AND CARRY STORES PAGE 16 OF 19 of additional runoff caused by the development in accordance with the Design and Construction Standards for Sanitary and Surface Water Management (as adopted by Clean Water Services in 2000 and including any future revisions or amendments). Since there will not be an increase in impervious areas on the site, this section will not apply. Bikeways and Pedestrian Pathways: Bikeway Extension: Section 18.810.110.A states that developments adjoining proposed bikeways identified on the City's adopted pedestrian/bikeway plan shall include provisions for the future extension of such bikeways through the dedication of easements or right-of-way. Pacific Highway is classified as a bike facility and presently has the width for bike lanes. ADDITIONAL CITY AND/OR AGENCY CONCERNS WITH STREET AND UTILITY IMPROVEMENT STANDARDS: Public Water System: This site is presently served by the Tualatin Valley Water District (TVWD). No additional public water line work is needed to support this development. Storm Water Quality: The City has agreed to enforce Surface Water Management (SWM) regulations established by Clean Water Services (CWS) Design and Construction Standards (adopted by Resolution and Order No. 00-7) which require the construction of on-site water quality facilities. The facilities shall be designed to remove 65 percent of the phosphorus contained in 100 percent of the storm water runoff generated from newly created impervious surfaces. In addition, a maintenance plan shall be submitted indicating the frequency and method to be used in keeping the facility maintained through the year. Since there are no additional impervious areas being created, this section will not apply. Address Assignments: The City of Tigard is responsible for assigning addresses for parcels within the City of Tigard and within the Urban Service Boundary (USB). An addressing fee in the amount of $30.00 per address shall be assessed. This fee shall be paid to the City prior to issuance of the site permit. For multi-tenant buildings, one address number is assigned to the building and then all tenant spaces are given suite numbers. The City is responsible for assigning the main address and suite numbers. This information is needed so that building permits for tenant improvements can be adequately tracked in the City's permit tracking system. Based on the information provided by the applicant, this building will be a multi-tenant building. Prior to final building inspection and issuance of a certificate of occupancy, the applicant shall provide a suite layout map so suite numbers can be assigned. The addressing fee will then be calculated based upon the number of suites that must be addressed. In multi-level structures, ground level suites shall have numbers preceded by a "1", second level suites shall have numbers preceded by a "2", etc. E. IMPACT STUDY (18.390) Section 18.360.090 states, "The Director shall make a finding with respect to each of the following criteria when approving, approving with conditions or denying an application:" Section 18.390.040 states that the applicant shall provide an impact study to quantify the effect of development on public facilities and services. For each public facility system and type of impact, the study shall propose improvements necessary to meet City standard, and to minimize the impact of the development on the public at large, public facilities systems, and affected private property users. NOTICE OF TYPE II DECISION SDR2002-00017/CASH AND CARRY STORES PAGE 17 OF 19 In situations where the Community Development Code requires the dedication of real property interests, the applicant shall either specifically concur with a requirement for public right-of-way dedication, or provide evidence that supports that the real property dedication is not roughly proportional to the projected impacts of the development. Section 18.390.040 states that when a condition of approval requires the transfer to the public of an interest in real property, the approval authority shall adopt findings which support the conclusion that the interest in real property to be transferred is roughly proportional to the impact the proposed development will have on the public. The applicant has provided an impact study addressing the project's impacts on public systems. The Washington County Traffic Impact Fee (TIF) is a mitigation measure that is required at the time of development. Based on a transportation impact study prepared by Mr. David Larson for the A-Boy Expansion/Dolan II/Resolution 95-61, TIF's are expected to recapture 32 percent of the traffic impact of new development on the Collector and Arterial Street system. The applicant will be required to pay TIF's of approximately $89,270 based on the use proposed and the trip generation study that was conducted by Group MacKenzie. Based on the estimate that total TIF fees cover 32 percent of the impact on major street improvements citywide, a fee that would cover 100 percent of this projects traffic impact is $278,968 ($89,270 divided by .32). The difference between the TIF paid, and the full impact, is considered the unmitigated impact on the collector and arterial street system. The unmitigated impact of this project on the transportation system is $189,698. A pedestrian easement has been required, but will not be dedicated to the city. Additional exactions if warranted could have been required and would have met the rough proportionality test. SECTION VII. OTHER STAFF COMMENTS The City of Tigard Police Department has reviewed the proposal and has no objections. The City of Tigard Urban Forester has reviewed the proposal and questioned whether there would be any tree impacts resulting from the addition of 7 parking spaces. As mentioned earlier in this report, the seven additional spaces were created from re-striping the existing asphalt, and no trees were impacted as a result. The City of Tigard Public Works Property Manager has reviewed the proposal and has no objections to it. SECTION VIII. AGENCY COMMENTS No separate agency comments were received. SECTION IX. PROCEDURE AND APPEAL INFORMATION Notice: Notice was posted at City Hall and mailed to: X The applicant and owners X Owner of record within the required distance X Affected government agencies Final Decision: THIS DECISION IS FINAL ON JANUARY 22, 2003 AND BECOMES EFFECTIVE ON FEBRUARY 6, 2003 UNLESS AN APPEAL IS FILED. NOTICE OF TYPE II DECISION SDR2002-00017/CASH AND CARRY STORES PAGE 18 OF 19 Appeal: The decision of the Director (Type II Procedure) or Review Authority (Type II Administrative Appeal or Type III Procedure) is final for purposes of appeal on the date that it is mailed. Any party with standing as provided in Section 18.390.040.G.1. may appeal this decision in accordance with Section 18.390.040.G.2. of the Tigard Community Development Code which provides that a written appeal together with the required fee shall be filed with the Director within ten (10) business days of the date the notice of the decision was mailed. The appeal fee schedule and forms are available from the Planning Division of Tigard City Hall, 13125 SW Hall Boulevard, Tigard, Oregon 97223. Unless the applicant is the appellant, the hearing on an appeal from the Director's Decision shall be confined to the specific issues identified in the written comments submitted by the parties during the comment period. Additional evidence concerning issues properly raised in the Notice of Appeal may be submitted by any party during the appeal hearing, subject to any additional rules of procedure that may be adopted from time to time by the appellate body. THE DEADLINE FOR FILING AN APPEAL IS AT 5:00 PM ON FEBRUARY 5, 2003. Questions: If you have any questions, please call the City of Tigard Planning Division, Tigard City Hall, 13125 SW Hall Boulevard, Tigard, Oregon at (503) 639-4171. January 22, 2003 P R EPAR BY: • Morg Tracy DATE Associate Planner ■ 2 _ e1(1 e_ALCIkr January 003 APPROVED BY: Richard H. Be - _ ��orff D ATE Planning Ma :ger is\curpin\morgan\workspace\sdr\sdr2002-00017(cash and carry)\sd2002-00017 decision draft.doc NOTICE OF TYPE II DECISION SDR2002-00017/CASH AND CARRY STORES PAGE 19 OF 19 �j �— CITY of TIGARD • Q M ii -� GEOGRAPHIC INFORMATION SYSTEM el 6 - °° t� N . s.____,____, E_____, • m, ,—� VICINITY MAP -.LE SDR2002-00017 N tit��. CASH & CARRY 41� 4,,,,,,i_ RETAIL STORE E f ir •,),.:111111k . 99 . .. oilk • ,.. �� ao .aat:;... . . , ,., , ,.%,,,,,,,¢� la 1 : . 41:;,..„,: 4 i O BEEF BiN0 R0 '7 'e• ��ST Tigard Area Map /• A N p7s 1 III m 0 100 200 300 400 500 Feet al ■ !Ill.rj(— E- 1".398 feet A J , City of Tigard �- Information on this map is for general location only and ■ should be verified with the Development Services Division. 11116k 13125 SW Hall Blvd Tigard,OR 97223 (503)- alEtialk httpJlwww ci.tiga d,or.us Community Development Plot date:Dec 17,2002;C:\magic\MAGIC03.APR • •0• t EA11PCRTT LINE P V • 13 /if (SAME - (E) O ! �. 0 8� i j pa(.T (EXISTING BUILDING) 1 V J , C, CASH AND CARRY I I — 22,608 S.F. LEASE SPACE `i1 �1 Rtf1itIPe fAKI<1N6(_- 9,772 S.F. rex a.Ty pR°I NANf I. t' TENANT IMPROVEMENT - SALES-ORIENTED 1 N ��ll'' �6J (CG)SALES-(ORIENTED - ``W 'P AO/ / Q Al,1N.1 8MMMC f.O, ,�,;,104D � a.view Y.. ,ie. "s�/.� V[lus {/'^) t�•i�TBT uw,r M[N p.,arK i - / z , to°UrM,c i'n - Y� _ �ti.�-,�.. .- - l C.! FE1w T�aNE3 i l i�• U1 i ,• ■; �� Z RlST'KIPR PAKKIwb PeK CITY aR�n1NCL��J rI rMllf'k CS , r~ t GM TRAINING •► t/7 SSSI c. . c �1�� J CENTER 1 a . ��/� 12 • %:1 'ftt t .. O PARKING AREA ,' 0- ift` \ a at° - � ....... `ifemY - i `on._ fAM/f 7 /� 1 7 , � • s i s€ r � o� ii 1 •om- ..• IL e...rm.f, mot ) ( "VW'c .1.11 U A oc3 ,\N 4-12(.0 Q PG\o`G CITY OF TIGARD t SDR2002-00017 so-r- F0 LAN CASH & CARRY RETAIL STORE (Map is not to scale) Smart&Final. Food • Supplies• Business• Home Donald G. Alvarado 600 Citadel Drive Senior Vice President Commerce,California 90040 General Counsel Telefax (323) 869-7862 (323) 869-7697 don.alvarado@smartandfinal.com February 11, 2003 VIA FAX AND FEDERAL EXPRESS City of Tigard Planning Department 13125 SW Hall Blvd. Tigard, OR 97224 Attn: Mr. Morgan Tracy Re: SDR 2002-000017 Cash& Carry Stores WITI=IDRAWAL OF APPEAL Dear Mr. Tracy: The undersigned is Senior Vice-President, General Counsel of Smart& Final, the applicant and appellant in the above-referenced matter. It is our understanding that the applicant and/or owner has satisfied all the conditions relating to the City's review of the above-referenced matter. Accordingly, the applicant hereby withdraws its appeal and asks that the hearing date, currently set for February 19, 2003 be vacated. Please proceed to issue any required certificates of occupancy forthwith. Thank your for your attention to this. Very t y yours, (ve /1G. ado cc: M. Robinson—Perkins Coie F. Gallarzo—Smart& Final M. Trtek Smart&Final Inc. • Smart&Final Stores • Cash&Carry Stores • Smart&Final Foodservice American Foodservice Distributors • Henry Lee Company • Amerifoods Trading Company JAN 27 2003 17:38 FR PERKINS COIE LLP 503 727 2222 TO 95036847297 P.02/02 Perkins Cole 1211 SW Fifth Avenue,Suite 1500 Michael C.Robinson Portland,OR 97204-3715 PHONE 503.727.2264 PHONE:503.727.2000 tstAU:robicn[Jpericinacoie.com FA)(:503.727.2222 www.perkinsrole.com January 27, 2003 BY FACSIMILE Mr. Richard Bewersdorff Planning Director City of Tigard 13125 SW Hall Blvd. Tigard, OR 97223 Re: Application by Smart and Final Stores (Cash and Carry) Dear Mr. Bewersdorff: This office represents the applicant. Please place me on the mailing list for all future notices and receipt of staff reports. If you receive any correspondence on this matter, please provide me with a copy of the correspondence. I appreciate your assistance in the future. Very y yours, C• 19/0-6-1\-- Michael C. Robinson MCR:kla cc: Mr. Dan Alvarado (via facsimile) Mr. Fernando Gallarzo (via facsimile) Mr. Morgan Tracy (via facsimile) Mr. Roger Alfred [08554-0055/13A030240.062) ANCHORAGE BEIJING • BELLEVUE • BOISE • CHICAGO • DENVER • HONG KONG • LOS ANGELES MENLO PARK • OLYMPIA • PORTLAND • 5AN FRANCISCO • SEATTLE • SPOKANE • WASHINGTON, P.C. Perkins Cole LLP(Perkins Cole tic in Illinois) ** TOTAL PAGE.02 ** -— , ."�%.vlVUR)/.9 .__-..... -. �.,�..�. Legal Notice Advertisinn City of Tigard 13125 SW Hall Blvd . 4110 CITY OF TIGARD "Tigard,Oregon 97223 - , "I Accounts Payable AI,l , • The following will be considered by the Tigard Hearings Officer on Wednesday February 19, 2003 at 7:00 PM at the Tigard Civic Center - Town Hall, 13125 SW Hall Blvd., Tigard, Oregon. Both public oral and written testimony is invited. AFFIDAVIT OF p The public hearing on this matter will be conducted in accordance STATE OF OREGON, ) the Tigard Municipal Code and the rules of procedure adopted COUNTY OF WASHINGTON �' by the Council and available at City Hall or the rules of procedure set � ) • forth in Chapter 18.390. Testimony may be submitted in writing I, Kathy Snyder prior to or at the public hearing or verbally at the public hearing only. being first duly sworn, depose and say he Failure to raise an issue in person or by letter at some point prior to Director, or his principal clerk, of th 'i the close of the hearing accompanied by statements or evidence a newspaper of general circulation as de sufficient to afford the decision-maker an opportunity to respond to and 193.020; published at Tigard the issue precludes appeal to the Land Use Board of Appeal based on aforesaid county and state; that the Pub:that issue. Failure to specify the criterion from the Community S Di 2 0 0 2—0 0 017,Cash & Carry Development Code or Comprehensive Plan at which a comment is directed precludes an appeal based on that criterion. a printed copy of which is hereto annexed,A copy of the application and all documents and evidence submitted entire issue of said newspaper for ONE by or on behalf of the applicant and the applicable criteria are consecutive in the following issues: available for inspection at no cost. A copy of the staff report will be made available for inspection at no cost at least seven(7)days prior January 30 ,2 0 0 3 to the hearing, and copies for all items can also be provided at a reasonable cost. Further information may be obtained from the Planning Division (staff contact: Morgan Tracy) at 13125 SW Hall Blvd., Tigard, Oregon 97223, or by calling 503-639-4171. ■ A _a...,. `4 PUBLIC SITE DEVELOPMENT REVIEW(SDR)2002-00017 >APPEAL OF CASH& CARRY STORES< Subscribed and sworn to for me this 30 ITEM ON APPEAL: On January 22, 2003, the Director issued a decision to approve a request for Site Development Review approval to convert an existing 32,380 square foot building from a furniture 4e store(bulk sales use)to a discount grocery store(retail sales use)and Not future retail tenant space. Apart from re-striping the parking lot and My Commission Expires: minor façade changes,no other alterations are proposed. On January 24, 2003 an appeal was filed concerning the imposition of two AFFIDAVIT conditions of approval: Condition #1 which requires a pedestrian easement to the abutting property to the north, and Condition #3 which requires a reciprocal access easement for vehicles provided that the Oregon Department of Transportation approves of such a connection. LOCATION: 11745 SW Pacific Highway; WCTM 1 S 136CD, Tax Lot 1000. ZONE: C-G: General Commercial District. REVIEW CRITERIA BEING APPEALED: Community Development Code Chapters 18.705 and 18.810. ,..._ s, i r,.., i i r-i- i f -.1 -- 1 i`——II .._ 1-----;i(„ �_i L--1_,..4^""i f i—_ 1 i 1 loamy elm r j ' r—f r 3 i tj� 4 � � i} ;�, 1 L � ' 4 V�•--�SDA2Nt•1M11 M to f_.. Ai----�,---., flit .t'- i i I ;_..,i rt._!i -1 ' {t�. -- --- i, CA$N a CAI* MKS _,r i.. �1 l _. r T; i ... L... .� —_ i i a i I'KS^\� a!) `! I .4-.43 ,..∎ i 1 ij ♦ i 'j<1 \` it ` , ii r \-- ‘V- '. cr!1 I: , ,. .: v„,--- c)1 I --,:- .4..., I}.... mil . ` 1 y i .ti t....�l A TT 10181 —Publish January 30, 2003. NOTICE TO MORTGAGEE, LIENHOLDER,VENDOR OR SELLER: THE TIGARD DEVELOPMENT CODE REQUIRES THAT IF YOU RECEIVE THIS NOTICE, IT SHALL BE PROMPTLY FORWARDED TO THE PURCHASER. CITY OF TIGARD Community(Development Shaping A Better Community PUBLIC NEARING NOTICE NOTICE IS HEREBY GIVEN THAT THE TIGARD HEARINGS OFFICER,AT A MEETING ON WEDNESDAY, FEBRUARY 19, 2003 AT 7:00 PM, IN THE TOWN HALL OF THE TIGARD CIVIC CENTER AT 13125 SW HALL BOULEVARD, TIGARD, OREGON 97223, WILL CONSIDER THE FOLLOWING APPLICATION: FILE NO.: SITE DEVELOPMENT REVIEW (SDR) 2002-00017 FILE TITLE: "APPEAL" OF CASH & CARRY STORE APPLICANT: Smart & Final Stores OWNER: Monaghan Farms, Inc. Attn: Fernando Gallarzo Attn: Tom Deline 600 Citadel Drive 14120 East Evans Avenue Los Angeles, CA 90040 Aurora, CO 80014 ITEM ON APPEAL: On January 22, 2003, the Director issued a decision to approve a request for Site Development Review approval to convert an existing 32,380 square foot building from a furniture store (bulk sales use) to a discount grocery store (retail sales use) and future retail tenant space. Apart from re-striping the parking lot and minor facade changes, no other alterations are proposed. On January 24, 2003 an appeal was filed concerning the imposition of two conditions of approval: Condition #1 which requires a pedestrian easement to the abutting property to the north, and Condition #3 which requires a reciprocal access easement for vehicles provided that the Oregon Department of Transportation approves of such a connection. LOCATION: 11745 SW Pacific Highway; WCTM 1 S136CD, Tax Lot 1000. ZONE: C-G: General Commercial District. The C-G zoning district is designed to accommodate a full range of retail, office and civic uses with a City-wide and even regional trade area. Except where non-conforming, residential uses are limited to single-family residences which are located on the same site as a permitted use. A wide range of uses, including but not limited to adult entertainment, automotive equipment repair and storage, mini-warehouses, utilities, heliports, medical centers, major event entertainment, and gasoline stations, are permitted conditionally. REVIEW CRITERIA BEING APPEALED: Community Development Code Chapters 18.705 and 18.810. THE PUBLIC HEARING ON THIS MATTER WILL BE CONDUCTED IN ACCORDANCE WITH THE RULES OF CHAPTER 18.390 OF THE COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT CODE AND RULES OF PROCEDURE ADOPTED BY THE TIGARD HEARINGS OFFICER AND CITY COUNCIL AND AVAILABLE AT CITY HALL. ASSISTIVE LISTENING DEVICES ARE AVAILABLE FOR PERSONS WITH IMPAIRED HEARING. THE CITY WILL ALSO ENDEAVOR TO ARRANGE FOR QUALIFIED SIGN LANGUAGE INTERPRETERS AND QUALIFIED BILINGUAL INTERPRETERS UPON REQUEST. PLEASE CALL (503) 639-4171, EXT. LESS THANE )ONE (WEEK 3) 684-2772 PRIOR TO THE H ARINGOTO MMUNICATIONS DEVICES MAKE ARRANGEMENTS.FOR THE DEAF) NO ANYONE WISHING TO PRESET, 1 WRITTEN TESTIMONY ON THIS . ROPOSED ACTION MAY DO SO IN WRITING PRIOR TO OR AT THE PUBLIC HEARING. ORAL TESTIMONY MAY BE PRESENTED AT THE PUBLIC HEARING. AT THE PUBLIC HEARING, THE HEARINGS OFFICER WILL RECEIVE A STAFF REPORT PRESENTATION FROM THE CITY PLANNER, OPEN THE PUBLIC HEARING, AND INVITE BOTH ORAL AND WRITTEN TESTIMONY. THE HEARINGS OFFICER MAY CONTINUE THE PUBLIC HEARING TO ANOTHER MEETING TO OBTAIN ADDITIONAL INFORMATION OR CLOSE THE PUBLIC HEARING AND TAKE ACTION ON THE APPLICATION. IF A PERSON SUBMITS EVIDENCE OR DOCUMENTS LESS THAN 7 DAYS PRIOR TO THE PUBLIC HEARING DATE, THE HEARINGS AUTHORITY MAY ALLOW A CONTINUANCE OF THE HEARING, SUBJECT TO ORS 215.428 OR 227.178. IF THERE IS NO CONTINUANCE GRANTED AT THE HEARING, ANY PARTICIPANT IN THE HEARING MAY REQUEST THAT THE RECORD REMAIN OPEN FOR AT LEAST SEVEN (7) DAYS AFTER THE HEARING. A REQUEST THAT THE RECORD REMAIN OPEN CAN BE MADE ONLY AT THE FIRST EVIDENTIARY HEARING (ORS 197.763(6). INCLUDED IN THIS NOTICE IS A LIST OF APPROVAL CRITERIA APPLICABLE TO THE REQUEST FROM THE TIGARD COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT CODE AND THE TIGARD COMPREHENSIVE PLAN. APPROVAL OR DISAPPROVAL OF THE REQUEST BY THE HEARINGS OFFICER WILL BE BASED UPON THE CRITERIA LISTED OR OTHER CRITERIA IN THE COMPREHENSIVE PLAN OR DEVELOPMENT CODE WHICH THE PERSON BELIEVES TO APPLY TO THE DECISION. AT THE HEARING IT IS IMPORTANT THAT COMMENTS RELATING TO THE REQUEST PERTAIN SPECIFICALLY TO THE APPLICABLE CRITERIA IN THE COMPREHENSIVE PLAN OR THE DEVELOPMENT CODE. FAILURE TO RAISE AN ISSUE IN PERSON OR BY LETTER AT SOME POINT PRIOR TO THE CLOSE OF THE HEARING ON THE REQUEST, ACCOMPANIED BY STATEMENTS OR EVIDENCE SUFFICIENT TO ALLOW THE HEARINGS AUTHORITY AND ALL PARTIES TO RESPOND PRECLUDES AN APPEAL, AND FAILURE TO SPECIFY THE CRITERION FROM THE COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT CODE OR COMPREHENSIVE PLAN AT WHICH A COMMENT IS DIRECTED PRECLUDES AN APPEAL TO THE LAND USE BOARD OF APPEALS BASED ON THAT ISSUE. ALL DOCUMENTS AND APPLICABLE CRITERIA IN THE ABOVE-NOTED FILE ARE AVAILABLE FOR INSPECTION AT NO COST OR COPIES CAN BE OBTAINED FOR TWENTY-FIVE CENTS (250 PER PAGE, OR THE CURRENT RATE CHARGED FOR COPIES AT THE TIME OF THE REQUEST. AT LEAST SEVEN (7) DAYS PRIOR TO THE HEARING, A COPY OF THE STAFF REPORT WILL BE AVAILABLE FOR INSPECTION AT NO COST, OR A COPY CAN BE OBTAINED FOR TWENTY-FIVE CENTS (25 ) PER PAGE, OR THE CURRENT RATE CHARGED FOR COPIES AT THE TIME OF THE REQUEST. FOR FURTHER INFORMATION PLEASE CONTACT THE STAFF PLANNER MORGAN TRACY AT (503) 639-4171, TIGARD CITY HALL, 13125 SW HALL BOULEVARD, TIGARD, OREGON 97223 OR BY E-MAIL AT morgan(a�ci.tigard.or.us. i __ --- LI I :_: _ __I . , \ V € VICINITY MAP 6. 1 __ J t�SDR2002 00011 111111 137 I__c.o it 4ls‘..S. ,o.1. 111 \\\' , ' CASH & CARRY 1 �� AA RETAIL STORE ,,� k * ,Wsi VIII * \)LI fill • . cm ortfgard 1111111/ • JAN 24 2003 10 26 FR PERKINS COIE LLP 503 727 2222 TO 95036847297 P.02/02 01/13/200,3 17:43 FAX 5036847" City of Tigard IaOO2 APPEAL FILING FORM „a,,`�'�' FOR LAND USE DECISIONS CITY OF TIGARD 13125 SW Hall Blvd., Tigard, OR 97223(503) 639-4171 FAX:(503) 684-7297 The City of Tigard supports the citizen's right to participate In local government. Tigard's Land Use Code, therefore,sets out specific requirements for filing appeals on certain land use decisions. The following form has been developed to assist you In filing an appeal of a land use decision in proper form. To determine what filing fees will be required or to answer any questions you have regarding the appeal process, please contact the Planning Division or the City Recorder at the phone/fax listed at the top of this form. GENERAL INFORMATION FOR STAFF USE ONLY Property Address/Location(s) and Name(s) of the Case No.(s): SPg2appZ,-02017 Application Being Appealed: �� Zoos.- t7 DO l Ca5 1I h(.tticrt r Il1`{S 51n/ Case Nam*); t�►G:t-'C__ K W-1 Receipt No.: How Do You Qualify As A Party?: vie, ('t-?.re Se.✓' 11.-� pr C c.}A�T, (...o ., Q,nd C.a r Application Accepted By: CI)f e.s Date: Az II ?el-416 C.ol e. (Ilk SW 5 Approved As To Form By',i ��,^ Appellant's Address: i 11 Date: 1/2-‘1/03 City/State: Pot"c-tie,"d OV Zip: G117.-199_ Denied As To Form By: Day Phone Where You Can Be Reached:( CO- ) it -7-12S Li Date: Scheduled Date Decision Is To Be Final: -1-7-- O-S Rev.15•ru,o-02 1:Sciirpinlawstoralrovisadiappeal.Coc Date Notice of Final Decision Was Given: -Z3 o 3 Specific Grounds For Appeal or Review: REQUIRED SUBMITTAL ELEMENTS .,t) ...01S " Q r1i Ved (— / Application Elements Submitted: I vy C A) rc- pv,a et" eDI,A4 _ ! d Appeal Filing Form (completed) ?e r\(-,tic, Co;e LLP c.to,Ce4 ❑ Filing Fee(based on criteria below) -TG v1 v•a Z3 . Z eG llG.n i - ). Directors Decision to Planning Con 3s on ) Explicated ae,aw NOW A) $ 250.00 s 300.00 > boating Reform $ 900.00 ). Flaming Comm sslorJMearinpb Moor to City Councl f 1,790.00 S L � �v��j .n� ` I�^ p o S 1 f'1 t9 ✓� l�rrerwo tJ� rrD �v\d;r�dv�S; — I Ct• 1- (i). _ Slgna e(s)of Ap It nt(s): APPEAL FILING FORM ADA LAND use oecisiONS (OVER FOR ADDfWONAL WRITING SPACEl ** TOTAL PAGE.02 *;r RECD JAN 2 4 2003 Perkins Coie 1211 S.W.Fifth Avenue,Suite 1500 Michael C.Robinson P11oNE:503.727.2264 Portland,OR 97204-3715 PMnn:mrobinson @perkinscoie.com PHONE:503.727.2000 FAX:503.727.2222 January 23, 2003 www.perkinscoie.com BY FEDERAL EXPRESS James Hendryx Community Development Director City of Tigard 13125 SW Hall Blvd. Tigard, OR 97223 Re: Notice of Appeal of Type II Decision in SDR 2002-00017— Cash and Carry Stores Dear Mr. Hendryx: I represent the applicant in the above-referenced matter. This letter constitutes our notice of appeal of the planning division decision dated January 22, 2003 approving the application to convert the existing 32,380-square foot building from a furniture store to a discount grocery store. As the applicant, we have standing to appeal. We are appealing the planning division's decision to impose the following two conditions: (a) condition one, which requires the applicant to record a pedestrian access easement for a future pedestrian/bicycle connection to the abutting property to the north; and (b) condition three, which requires the applicant to accept a condition that if ODOT approves a vehicular connection between the subject property and the property to the north, then the two properties shall provide reciprocal easements and construct a vehicular connection when the property to the north develops. The required filing fee in the amount of$250 is attached to this notice of appeal. Thank you for your consideration of this matter. Very truly yours, C . ,erie-,4-4"---1 Michael C. Robinson MCR:djf cc: Don Alvarado Morgan Tracy, City of Tigard [085 54-0055/PA030230.092] ANCHORAGE • BEIJING • BELLEVUE • BOISE CHICAGO • DENVER HONG KONG • LOS ANGELES MENLO PARK OLYMPIA • PORTLAND • SAN FRANCISCO • SEATTLE • SPOKANE • WASHINGTON, D.C. Perkins Coie LLP(Perkins Coie LLC in Illinois) CITY OF TIGARD 1/27/2003 13125 SW Hall Blvd. 9:05:47AM, , Tigard, Oregon 9 72 23 4J ' (50 3) 63 9-417 1 Receipt #: 27200300000000000318 Date: 01/27/2003 Line Items: Case No Tran Code Description Revenue Account No Amount Paid SDR2002-00017 [LANDUS] Appeal DD-Pln Corn 100-0000-438000 250.00 Line Item Total: $250.00 Payments: Method Payer User ID Acct./Check Approval No. How Received Amount Paid Check PERKINS COIE LLP met 9205 In Person 250.00 Payment Total: $250.00 9205 PERKINS COTE LLP WELLS FARGO BANK 1211 SW 5TH AVE.,STE.1500 PORTLAND,OR 97201 PORTLAND,OR 97204-3715 24-680-1230 503-727-2000 1/23/2003 2 PAY TO THE ORDER OF City Of Tigard "250.00 ° DOLLARS 8 Two Hundred Fifty and 00/100******** m ****************,w*ww►wwl∎-****iwiwt************I h%****wtwww************wxfff►iwxxf N •r MEMO • Appeal fee AP Page 1 of 1 cReceipt.rpt 01/23/2003 10:38 FAX 5036847297 City of Tigard 1 001 * : C:3: :*C C : :*::3:3:1::3:: 1:: :3: x:$:3 TX REPORT $*$ a:xa:C:3::*:xC:3::3:VI:a:3:*:3::I:*:3: TRANSMISSION OK TX/RX NO 0955 CONNECTION TEL 5037272222 SUBADDRESS CONNECTION ID ST. TIME 01/23 10:24 USAGE T 14'00 PGS. SENT 21 RESULT OK Post-its Fax Note 7671 Date , pages o. 1/ Co./Dep./0,-6,-2 t Co �9T 17? / Phone#7 [f/...._ .'F 6, Phones#�7i/r�/-, /7/�/ , — Fax# �] Fax ri / / t ` °,z' 4�}a,"q : q�p f.70�5y N �/ t p _ :.":t' rotit Fp iii ., ...t,f .z.;.e..s f -0,41ll i t JO' F,. k:`•t':,∎tt tS,IrltC;,, )LY Lull' VK•.. .` 6 ) t;n'•FR:''•v •.a -a. `! �6r�� -,;: p. 1+s "{ i i:-:k .b;,-', ,i ,y .:, i7.:f ,F krL11-,•'L : r S fl•. 9,14,;t41-''''' ,.:CITY Ln iIGARD •. , i �h �fl„�j .r,,. a• I>' iA. !:,;':'.';'.:,,,i1.47,,...41'F+ , .F! .4�tT 4, „ ;!:: is � o.iAND ..RR }!' • • . �C• ammitmty 0M:4a.t,`s:. . ..?zlrr ak-12:H;;a.' ',; :'a;.kaGAgEgiS a•;:',..:.r+w :x . _ . .Uj•, 7 .v,�t..�. ;•:�,�..r�,_R . .w,m.�r ��;:;u�s��:sri. ,,�tiararnbr. ^k!rs+i:+r:.: •�w:�tisit.. c:.�:,�.,w.;.�.,. ' 20 DAYS =411 512053 SECTION I. APPLICATION SUMMARY FILE NAME: CASH AN_D__ CARRY STORES CASE NO.: Site Development Review (SDR) SDR2002-00017 PROPOSAL: The applicant is requesting Site Development Review approval to convert an existing 32,380 square foot building from a furniture store (bulk sales use) to a discount grocery store (retail sales use) and future retail tenant space. Apart from re-striping the parking lot and minor façade changes, no other alterations are proposed. OWNER: Monaghan Farms Attn: Tom Deline 14120 E. Evans Avenue Aurora, CO 80014 APPLICANT: Smart and Final Attn: Fernando Gallarzo 600 Citadel Drive Los Angeles, CA 90040 LOCATION: 11745 SW Pacific Highway; WCTM 1 S136CD, Tax Lot 1000. ZONE: C-G: General Commercial District. The C-G zoning district is designed to accommodate a full range of retail, office and civic uses with a City-wide and even reninnal trade area FYrPnt whara nnn-rnnfnrminn raciriantial NOTICE OF TYPE II DECISION SITE DEVELOPMENT REVIEW (SDR) 2002-00017 CITY OFTIGARD Community Development CASH AND CARRY STORES Shaping A Better Community 120 DAYS = 4/15/2003 SECTION I. APPLICATION SUMMARY FILE NAME: CASH AND CARRY STORES CASE NO.: Site Development Review (SDR) SDR2002-00017 PROPOSAL: The applicant is requesting Site Development Review approval to convert an existing 32,380 square foot building from a furniture store (bulk sales use) to a discount grocery store (retail sales use) and future retail tenant space. Apart from re-striping the parking lot and minor facade changes, no other alterations are proposed. OWNER: Monaghan Farms Attn: Tom Deline 14120 E. Evans Avenue Aurora, CO 80014 APPLICANT: Smart and Final Attn: Fernando Gallarzo 600 Citadel Drive Los Angeles, CA 90040 LOCATION: 11745 SW Pacific Highway; WCTM 1S136CD, Tax Lot 1000. ZONE: C-G: General Commercial District. The C-G zoning district is designed to accommodate a full range of retail, office and civic uses with a City-wide and even regional trade area. Except where non-conforming, residential uses are limited to single-family residences which are located on the same site as a permitted use. APPLICABLE REVIEW Community Development Code Chapters 18.360, 18.390, 18.520, 18.705, CRITERIA: 18.725, 18.745, 18.755, 18.765, 18.780, 18.795 and 18.810. SECTION II . DECISION Notice is hereby given that the City of Tigard Community Development Director's designee has APPROVED the above Site Development Review request subject to certain conditions of approval. The findings and conclusions on which the decision is based are noted in the full decision, available at City Hall. THIS APPROVAL SHALL BE VALID FOR 18 MONTHS FROM THE EFFECTIVE DATE OF THIS DECISION. All documents and applicable criteria in the above-noted file are available for inspection at no cost or copies can be obtained for twenty-five cents (25 ) per page, or the current rate charged for copies at the time of the request. SECTION III. PROCEDURE AND APPEAL INFORMATION Notice: Notice mailed to: X The applicant and owners X Owner of record within the required distance X Affected government agencies Final Decision: THIS DECISION IS FINAL ON JANUARY 22, 2003 AND BECOMES EFFECTIVE ON FEBRUARY 6, 2003 UNLESS AN APPEAL IS FILED. A_ppeal:. The Director's Decision is final on the date that it is mailed. All persons entitled to notice or who are otherwise adversely affected or aggrieved by the decision as provided in Section 18.390.040.G.1 may appeal this decision in accordance with Section 18.390.040.G.2 of the Tigard Community Development Code which provides that a written appeal together with the required fee shall be filed with the Director within ten (10) business days of the date the Notice of Decision was mailed. The appeal fee schedule and forms are available from the Planning Division of Tigard City Hall, 13125 SW Hall Boulevard, Tigard, Oregon 97223. Unless the applicant is the appellant, the hearing on an appeal from the Director's Decision shall be confined to the specific issues identified in the written comments submitted by the parties during the comment period. Additional evidence concerning issues properly raised in the Notice of Appeal may be submitted by any party during the appeal hearing, subject to any additional rules of procedure that may be adopted from time to time by the appellate body. THE DEADLINE FOR FILING AN APPEAL IS 5:00 PM ON JANUARY 5, 2003. Questions: For further information please contact the Planning Division Staff Planner, Morgan Tracy at (503) 639-4171, Tigard City Hall, 13125 SW Hall Boulevard, Tigard, Oregon 97223. Ns ow: am' Mow-EN — NI III 1Lii PIFaI . VICINITY MAP .'Ie ill,,ii-mN 1mi1 I:4lk V011116 i ,SDR2002 00011 s1 ia\�\ `\� �., CASH & CARRY N : ,yam �� -` RETAIL STORE PIP A -WV 10.4,111 ill "Illk & 0-, -.- lik -- ' • -, , y 111111111 , - ity oo® I .111111111 ' 11111. C d o I lip III �.r^- - '. w %''`.V i s ` . 0 I• . ' j N O CASH ANO CARRY F�:... ��/ 1. - - 111 =7:CENIFR NWO �c lu. m�. , I GAAEA C7 .v, 1. use e- . / 0 d )` Zty- e (_7 mss' O � F. s .+ g� y CI' P P CITY OF TIGARD t SDR2002-00017 s1TE P'S—A,P4 LASH&CARRY RETAIL STORE (Map is not to scare) NOTICE TO MORTGAGEE, LIENHOLDER,VENDOR OR SELLER: THE TIGARD DEVELOPMENT CODE REQUIRES THAT IF YOU RECEIVE THIS NOTICE,IT SHALL BE PROMPTLY FORWARDED TO THE PURCHASER. NO TIC E OF PENDING LAND USE APPLICATION SITE DEVELOPMENT REVIEW O a1. CITY OF TIGARD Community(Development Shaping il Better Community DATE OF NOTICE: December 17, 2002 FILE NUMBER: SITE DEVELOPMENT REVIEW (SDR) 2002-00017 Type II Land Use Application FILE NAME: CASH & CARRY RETAIL STORE PROPOSAL: The applicant is requesting Site Development Review approval to convert an existing 32,380 square foot building from a furniture store (bulk sales use) to a discount grocery store (retail sales use) and future retail tenant space. Apart from re-striping the parking lot and minor facade changes, no other alterations are proposed. No variances or adjustments are proposed as well. ZONE: C-G: General Commercial District. The C-G zoning district is designed to accommodate a full range of retail, office and civic uses with a City-wide and even regional trade area. Except where non-conforming, residential uses are limited to single-family residences which are located on the same site as a permitted use. A wide range of uses, including but not limited to adult entertainment, automotive equipment repair and storage, mini-warehouses, utilities, heliports, medical centers, major event entertainment, and gasoline stations, are permitted conditionally. APPLICABLE REVIEW CRITERIA: Community Development Code Chapters 18.360, 18.390, 18.520, 18.705, 18.725, 18.745, 18.755, 18.765, 18.780, 18.795 and 18.810. LOCATION: 11745 SW Pacific Highway; WCTM 1S136CD, Tax Lot 1000. YOUR RIGHT TO PROVIDE WRITTEN COMMENTS: Prior to the City making any decision on the Application, you are hereby provided a fourteen (14) day period to submit written comments on the application to the City. THE FOURTEEN (14) DAY PERIOD ENDS AT 5:00 PM ON DECEMBER 31, 2002. All comments should be directed to Morgan Tracy, Associate Planner in the Planning Division at the City of Tigard, 13125 SW Hall Boulevard, Tigard, Oregon 97223. You may reach the City of Tigard by telephone at (503) 639-4171. ALL COMMENTS MUST BE RECEIVED BY THE CITY OF TIGARD IN WRITING PRIOR TO 5:00 PM ON THE DATE SPECIFIED ABOVE IN ORDER FOR YOUR COMMENTS TO BE CONSIDERED IN THE DECISION MAKING PROCESS THE CITY OF TIGARD APPRECIATES RECEIVING COMMENTS AND VALUES YOUR INPUT. COMMENTS WILL BE CONSIDERED AND ADDRESSED WITHIN THE NOTICE OF DECISION. A DECISION ON THIS ISSUE IS TENTATIVELY SCHEDULED FOR JANUARY 2, 2003. IF YOU PROVIDE COMMENTS, YOU WILL BE SENT A COPY OF THE FULL DECISION ONCE IT HAS BEEN RENDERED. WRITTEN COMMENTS WILL BECOME A PART OF THE PERMANENT PUBLIC RECORD AND SHALL CONTAIN THE FOLLOWING INFORMATION: • Address the specific "Applicable Review Criteria" described in the section above or any other criteria believed to be applicable to this proposal; • Raise any issues and/or concerns believed to be important with sufficient evidence to allow the City to provide a response; • Comments that provide the basis for an appeal to the Tigard Hearings Officer must address the relevant approval criteria with sufficient specificity on that issue. Failure of any party to address the relevant approval criteria with sufficient specificity may preclude subsequent appeals to the Land Use Board of Appeals or Circuit Court on that issue. Specific findings directed at the relevant approval criteria are what constitute relevant evidence. AFTER THE 14 DAY COMMENT PERIOD CLOSES, THE DIRECTOR SHALL ISSUE A TYPE II ADMINISTRATIVE DECISION. THE DIRECTOR'S DECISION SHALL BE MAILED TO THE APPLICANT AND TO OWNERS OF RECORD OF PROPERTY LOCATED WITHIN 500 FEET OF THE SUBJECT SITE, AND TO ANYONE ELSE WHO SUBMITTED WRITTEN COMMENTS OR WHO IS OTHERWISE ENTITLED TO NOTICE. THE DIRECTOR'S DECISION SHALL ADDRESS ALL OF THE RELEVANT APPROVAL CRITERIA. BASED UPON THE CRITERIA AND THE FACTS CONTAINED WITHIN THE RECORD, THE DIRECTOR SHALL APPROVE, APPROVE WITH CONDITIONS OR DENY THE REQUESTED PERMIT OR ACTION. SUMMARY OF THE DECISION-MAKING PROCESS: . The application is accepted by the City . Notice is sent to property owners of record within 500 feet of the proposed development area allowing a 14-day written comment period. . The application is reviewed by City Staff and affected agencies. . City Staff issues a written decision. . Notice of the decision is sent to the Applicant and all owners or contract purchasers of record of the site; all owners of record of property located within 500 feet of the site, as shown on the most recent property tax assessment roll; any City-recognized neighborhood group whose boundaries include the site; and any governmental agency which is entitled to notice under an intergovernmental agreement entered into with the City which includes provision for such notice or anyone who is otherwise entitled to such notice. INFORMATION/EVIDENCE AVAILABLE FOR REVIEW: The application, written comments and supporting documents relied upon by the Director to make this decision are contained within the record and are available for public review at the City of Tigard Community Development Department. Copies of these items may be obtained at a cost of $.25 per page or the current rate charged for this service. Questions regarding this application should be directed to the Planning Staff indicated on the first page of this Notice under the section titled "Your Right to Provide Written Comments." _ __- , =.-_ „I CITY of TIGARD,�_, RI VICINITY MAP I ■ IEIi .. 1 RSDR2002-00017 h. \\��gm e ,CASH & CARRY ■ \ • RETAIL STORE Or 4.4-4-,„ AsAk li: :111111k 99: d ;vim€=1 44:x.:; V. M .`wr.. ./<_1 11111111111111• t N Weill" \ Ira \ 0,100___._200 300400 SW/eel iti - City of rigud 1 [45A\ ■ w...os.ns- Monaghan Farms, Inc. 14120 East Evans Avenue,Aurora, CO 80014 RECEIVED Telephone (303) 743-0100 Fax(303) 743-0202 �.'�� '; 2L103 CITY LH- I HARD DI.ANNING/EN'"rFERING January 14, 2003 (iu4 at, c (0Se,ag /Wil l-- Mr. Morgan Tracy ad lid (2l3+/02) Associate Planner City of Tigard 13125 SW Hall Blvd. Tigard, OR 97223 Re: 11745 S.W. Pacific Highway Tigard, Oregon Dear Mr. Tracy: Our company owns the above referenced property, and has leased the property to Sears Roebuck and Co. The current subtenant is Smart & Final Oregon, Inc., which does business under the tradename of United Grocers Cash and Carry. It is my understanding that Smart & Final is in the process of finalizing its improvements and the applications with the City. I have been informed that a neighboring land owner or developer has either objected, or intends to object to any modifications on our site, unless he is granted access to the Southwest Pacific Highway, through our property. I have not been contacted directly regarding this, however, this is the current information which I have. A few years ago, either the owner or developer of the site to the north of our property, contacted me regarding potential access to the Southwest Pacific Highway. At that time I informed them that our property was subject to a lease and a mortgage, which from a legal standpoint would be quite difficult to modify in order to grant any access to his property. Further, I explained that our property is not designed to effectively create a thoroughfare to the property to the north. Our property is designed as a destination retail facility and in order to create a thoroughfare through our property, there would be a significant loss of parking which we cannot afford. Please note that as of this date, neither the owner of the property to the North, or any developer has made any formal request, or offer to purchase any easement rights or any other access licenses. Accordingly, I do not think that the City should withhold any approvals based upon any objection from an adjoining landowner, based upon lack of access. It is my understanding that this adjoining landowner does have access to a public street on the north side of its property. If there is to be any discussion regarding access, I believe it to be a private matter between private citizens and should not involve the city government. Mr. Morgan Tracy City of Tigard January 14, 2003 Page Two I would be happy to discuss this matter with you in greater detail. If you have any questions, please contact me. Sincerely Thomas C. Deline Vice President TCD/ma cc: Smart & Final Oregon, Inc. JAN 22 2003 16:44 FR PERKINS COIE LLP 503 727 2222 TO 95036847297 P.01/03 FACSIMILE COVER SHEET PerkcnS 0"0.1.-101.:N.1.1 .1 vim II I (:1 Coie If there are any problems with this transmission,please call the ells S.W.Fifth Avenue,5ulte t5oo Portland,OR 872 04-3 71 5 Perkins Coie Fax Center at(503) 727-2049. pHoNE 503.727-2000 FAX:5o3 727.2222 DATE: January 22, 2003 COVER SHEET& 2 PAGES) www.perkinsmlecem CLIENT NUMBER: 08554-0055 RETURN TO: (NAME)Kate Anderson (Exr.)2146 (Room No.)1532 ORIGINAL DOCUMENT(S)WILL BE: Q SENT TO YOU ®HELD IN OUR FILES SENDER: TELEPHONE: FACSIMILE: Michael C. Robinson 1 (503) 727-2264 (503) 727-2222 RECIPIENT: COMPANY: TELEPHONE: FACSIMILE: Richard Bewersdorff City of Tigard (503) 639-4171 (503) 684-7297 Don..Alvarado (323) 869-7862 Fernando Golarzo (323) 869-7856 RE: This Fax contains confidential,privileged information intended only for the intended addressee. Do not read,copy or disseminate it unless you arc the intended addressee. If you have received this Fax in error,please email it back to the sender at perkinscoic.com and delete it from your system or call us (collect)immediately at 503,727.2000,and mail the original Fax to Perkins Coie LLP,1211 S.W.Fifth Avenue.Suite 1500,Portland,OR 97204-3715. ANCHORAGE BEIJING • BELLEVUE • BOISE • CHICAGO • DENVER HONG KONG • LOS ANGELES MENLO PARK - OLYMPIA • PORTLAND • SAN FRANCISCO • SEATTLE • WASHrNCTON. D.C. Perkins Cole LLP(Perkins Cole ac In Illinois) [PA030220.01 B) JAN 22 2003 16:44 FR PERKINS COIE LLP 503 727 2222 TO 95036847297 P.02/83 Perkins Coie 1211 S_W.Fifth Avenue,Suite 15oo Michael C.Robinson rHoxu 503,727.2264 Portland,OR 97204-3715 EMAIL.rabiIn@perkinscoie.com PHONE:503.727,2000 FAX:503.727.3222 January 22, 2003 www.perkinscoie,com BY FACSIMILE Mr. Richard Bewersdorff Planning Director City of Tigard 13125 SW Hall Blvd. Tigard, OR 97223 Re: Cash & Carry Retail Store; City of Tigard File No. SDR 2002- 00017 Dear Dick: This letter addresses the letter from Welkin Engineering in opposition to the above-referenced application, specifically regarding the application of Tigard Development Code (TDC) 18.705.L. Contrary to Welkin's assertions, that code provision does not require, or even authorize, the city to impose a condition requiring an access easement between the Welkin property to the north and the proposed Cash and Carry site. Welkin's letter also cites the city's Comprehensive Plan; however, the Plan is not included as part of the applicable approval criteria for this application. The relevant code provision states: "To eliminate the need to use public streets for movements between commercial or industrial properties, parking areas shall be designed to connect with parking areas on adjacent properties unless not feasible. The Director shall require access easements between properties where necessary to provide for parking area connections." The purpose of this code requirement is clearly stated in its text -- to eliminate the need for movements on public streets between properties. In the present case, there is no basis on which the city could make a conclusion that there is a need for traffic movement between Cameron Plaza and the proposed Cash & Carry store. The Cash & Carry store is a specialty use that will not be open to the general public; rather, the store will sell business-related food and janitorial [08554-0055/PA 030210.1041 ANCHORAGE ' BEIJING BELLEVUE • BOISE • CHICAGO • DENVER • HONG KONG • LOS ANGELES MENLO PARK OLYMPIA PORTLAND • SAN FRANCISCO • SEATTLE SPOKANE WASHINGTON. D.C. Perkins Coie LLP(Perkins Coie LLC in Illinois) JAN 22 2003 16:44 FR PERKINS COIE LLP 503 727 2222 TO 95036847297 P.03/03 S • Richard Bewersdorff January 22, 2003 Page 2 supplies to retail customers. The signage for the Cash & Carry store will indicate that it is not open to the public. Because there is no crossover between Cameron Plaza and Cash& Carry customers, there is no basis for requiring an access easement for traffic between those uses under TDC 18,705.L. Also, TDC 18.705.E is clearly intended to apply to situations where there are adjacent commercial uses on the same street, not where there are two uses on different streets that share a back property line. Under the present circumstances, Welkin's proposal would create a problem with cut-through traffic between Highway 99 and Pfaffle Street. In fact, it is clear that Welkin's motivation is simply to obtain a new access point onto Highway 99 for the Cameron Plaza site, which would create new traffic impacts on Highway 99, and overburden the intersection of Highway 99 and Hall Boulevard. Because Cameron Plaza does not have a highway access permit from ODOT for access to Highway 99, the Welkin proposal for a condition requiring shared access is not "feasible" under TDC 18.705.L. Please place this letter into the record of proceedings on this application. Thank you for considering these comments. Very truly yours, S Michael C. Robinson MCR:djf cc: Mr. Don Alvarado (via facsimile) Mr. Fernando Golarzo (via facsimile) Mr. Roger Alfred [085540055/PA030210.104] January 22.2003 ** TOTAL PAGE.03 ** • • • RECEIVED DEC 1 2002 Welkin Engineering, P.C. CIIYUr II(,ARD PLANNING/ENGINEERING December 31, 2002 JO: 97-112.01 Morgan Tracy, Associate Planner City of Tigard 13125 SW Hall Blvd. Tigard, OR 97223 RE: CASH & CARRY RETAIL STORE SDR 2002-00017 APPLICATION WRITTEN RESPONSE Dear Morgan: Welkin Engineering, P.C. as the representative for SDR 1999-0002, and SDR 2001-00048, has reviewed the Type II application for the Cash&Carry located at 11745 Pacific Highway and finds it lacking in detail and specificity. As submitted, the applicant does not provide sufficient written detail to properly ascertain if the project meets the criteria presented to the applicant in the September 12, 2002, Pre-application conference notes. In concert, the applicant was required to review and comment on Community Development Code Chapters 18.360, 18.390, 18.520, 18.705, 18.745. 18.765, 18.795, and 18.810, and but for the site plan and Neighborhood meeting letter, basically did not respond to the city or adjoining property owners. As the only person present at the Neighborhood Meeting,I take offence at the notion that I was there solely to support"his own agenda" as stated in the Cash and carry Neighborhood meeting notes. Having been the planner of record for numerous applications in the vicinity, I was there to ensure the applicants were meeting the same level of approval standards as other developments in the area. On the other hand, Smart and Final appeared to be unreceptive to making any changes which would require them to make the neighborhood better or spend money. At the Neighborhood Meeting it was apparent they were not familiar with the Tigard Community Development Codes or Comprehensive Plan. Their SDR application confirms this and makes no effort to address the Neighborhood Meeting representative issues. In reviewing the Tigard Community Development Code Chapters we found the submittal as provided by Cash & Carry was at a minimum deficient as follows: Section 18.360-Lacks sufficient information to determine completeness. The primary purpose of this section is to insure the implementation of the City's Comprehensive Plan. Although the site plan and the legend may contain much of the information required in 18.360, there is no narrative to definitively confirms this requirement. Section 18.390-Lacks sufficient information to determine completeness. The applicant states that they are leaving it up to the city to determine whether or not the applicant sufficiently applies the 8000 SW Pfaffle Street, Portland, OR 97223 Phone: (503) 598-1866 • Fax: (503) 598-1868 • Email: ekc12 @attbi.com Type II requirements correctly. By their own admission,they are not even attempting to apply this section. Section 18.520 - This development meets the criteria addressed in this section. Section 18.705 - The applicant leaves the requirement of addressing this section for access and circulation up to the city and the adjoining properties, even though they are increasing the trips to the site by 451 vehicles per day with just 2/3rds of the building in use. If the remaining building were to become a restaurant, the additional trips could quadruple. Given that the Dartmouth/78`h- Highway 99 intersection is one of the most congested in the city, the 78th leg would stack up consistently past our driveways on SW Pfaffle Street. Providing better circulation between these CG and C-P properties, is necessary. Currently, if the properties to the north want to go to the Pacific Crossroads retail center, we have to use public roads. If an access was provided between these developments,we would not need to use the public street system numerous trips per day. As discussed at the Neighborhood Meeting, the properties to the north which are zoned, approved or developed as C-P,are extremely concerned about the ability to effectively meet the requirements of this section. The City's Comprehensive Plan examines the relationship between commercial developments and states that,access between commercial developments be required when possible. Section 18.705.K.2 of the Development Code,authorizes the Director to require joint access between neighboring developments. This access would require a relocation of the building on SDR 1999- 0002, which they will accommodate. Access to Pfaffle street would indirect and would not be heavily used by "Cut through"traffic. During the Neighborhood Meeting,the applicants stated they were not interested in the additional access,because we were not their typical clientele. During the approval process for SDR 1999-0002, and SDR 2001-00048, the city required a joint driveway and reciprocal access agreements between these adjoining property owners. SDR 2001- 00048 was also required to "not preclude connectivity" to the GM Training Center if it was ever redeveloped. Given,the fact that we intend to heavily use the adjoining GC,we request that the city require a joint access driveway. The joint access driveway will reduce trips on the public roads, reduce emissions from vehicles, and provide better pedestrian connections through the site. The joint access is physically possible and could be constructed at the time of the development of SDR 1999-0002. According to our preliminary assessment upon the access and parking reconstruction, SDR 2002-00017 would pick up 2 additional standard parking spaces. Both of the developers for SDR 1999-0002 and SDR 2001-00048,would agree to reciprocal access agreements with the SDR 2002-0017 applicant to resolve this major issue. Section 18.745 - It appears that this development meets the criteria addressed in this section, and would still meet it if the access driveway and additional parking was constructed. Section 18.765 -It appears that this development meets the criteria addressed in this section at this time, and would still meet it if the access driveway and additional parking was constructed. Section 18.795 - It appears that this development meets the criteria addressed in this section. Section 18.810-It appears that this development does not meet the criteria addressed in this section. No new public improvements are required for this development, but the impact area is not fully 8000 SW Pfaffle Street, Portland, OR 97223 Phone: (503) 598-1866 • Fax: (503) 598-1868 • Email: ekc12 @attbi.com rI fI addressed. Because of the increased traffic resulting from this change in use, the intersection at Dartmouth/78`h-Highway 99 should be reviewed for additional widening. This should be provided in order to assess the need for increased capacity for the Dartmouth/78`h legs. Improvements could include widening the 78`h Street leg between Pfaffle and Highway 99,and restriping the intersection. This would increase the capacity of this intersection and possibly alleviate the impact of the increased traffic resulting from this partial change in use. If you should have any questions or would care to contact me regarding this SDR, please feel free to contact me at(503) 598-1866. Sincerely, WELKIN ENGINEERING, P.C. &6( Ed Christensen, P.E. Principal Attachments cc: Kirk Cameron, Cameron Plaza Jill Christensen, Welkin Corporate Center P:\CLIENT FILES(by job#)\1997\97-112.01 Welkin\Planning file\Correspondence File\Cash and Carry Comments.wpd 8000 S.W. Pfaffle Street • Portland, or 97223 Phone: (503) 598-1866 • Fax: (503) 598-1866 • Email: ekcl2 @attbi.com AUG-07-2002 WED 04:56 PM SMART&FINAL STORES CORP FAX NO 32'18697856 P. 04 I , O: is' t .. J�`".. • . :JI Y9 1111. 1 '` "A� t•:' i♦q n•-, , NAU a,0.Z li .�' 4 t,' G . •.� . ' Y� Ililir •1-�� Y �V.11/:•1=';'4 w �� ..67+ t:' : ::-•"7.:4,-,,_:t i - ,?a" •.,i51,.' a '. c F 6 -eta'e. C .9 ' •: .%'- MS fries. {,• (EXISTING BUILDING) • , , i , , ` �/ / r i lr ,..i .' CASH AND CARRY c j•.4.:' . k '..,.'�, ' ��jj ��++n/� S.F. 't LEASE SPACE '. IC,A .: •'t .R c /i tctN'b(.. 1 r?.}ab;:�*N'�.' ZI.�YLB S 9'172 S.F. •t'ti' . 1 DI 14r .. tl :,;� •'t:: ,, TENANT IMPROVEMENT sq( 772 S . . ...,c"?' Amami•ORIENTED 1 p' 0' •:i ` -'41•°. . (C-Q)S(..LES,ORINN7 ED , , '.:'.`'1 ,...,ti• "!:'•'•...- . 4. . IN ,i.,.,,n •• ...f....•7,:•,, •�••,,. • t. J„y rr.,' 0.,;.-41 , .c.X11- f:-0 \i •7tt . t.. ..� y ! w�•t 7-•J�' F�? ♦i� $�N .. �+it .1' '•'L i.u.; :t,.�.,,L.- k..v, '41ro:6. ..t�.,. •7, S'®:,10, AUILDINO ��pit•+�tt1 r'i' Y •','jjJ.• t• . (to a0 �.� L r••'a v 1:,izLl,:y.,rr,, F�,,#.. / .• % �1`�,j �, �.I�..t#STKtPra .ral4rclN6 PEK C)Tr oliP.,Hatj� .� t ` •�♦� �;;c �r /• r'' op�' pit' . Oa ' • rS " - R �•\, 6t ` � Nb„,1 3 C 0VHAN0 ►4 il o it C . p � 6 ac i • A eLe-4'''''' , es A % '...i."..!'' ' :. ...-- '-al•„.-:"..,.......'. '.......484 ii.:, -.At..`4''...--.-",',:.••'--••••,: :.•' ....-:II . ..;... ...e- • . 7 ... . . •. ..1.... , c :•.- „;. '. .;i " ' ' ...- '.1'•.-- ,_ -\*.' ,;,•-.. .• P„ t...'. •...„.:*•. .),•!-.•. - ' ,,ar e, • k'..,-,_.:..1-;-.... • , . ..fr'ii;‘, .!.;.i.11'4;;., ' : •• ' ' T'3?I ` ysf ._ , ` ,.`. '!' .. :.. ♦ti .• l•.M „ -...% •�.^ l ' '!Y r n/c• ..••O:" 1.i.,4,i ',; tq•• SITE AREA(EXISTING): id-r,791 Si.(TAT AGRFS-) SLOWING GROSS S.F.: 32.30311.F. 22.906 B.F.-CAM i GARRY 9,772 S.F.-LEASE SPACE • ZONING; i MEPCLAL c3 RAL) `4• USE(NEW): BAJ.1:8-Ok.F b`-- \ PARKING REQUIRED 120 81 I1-S • •1711,000. (92,990 1 1000)x 3.7.120 • ` .60%Ct W ARD BPAC£ 6 HANdCaP B7/A1:4 '/\!,` -s0%co1,IPACT SPACXI be 6TANDARDE 67 COMPACT PARKING PROVIDED 1Zi 6TALL9(1NGWDINI 6 �` (NEW}: HANDICAP C STALLS) -RECNRED MIN.u_LAF 6 c N is WrAlia Iw All9 �i� �V\ 0 6PACE(m 170 BTM LB.6 6n COMPACT' v/� PARKING STALL SAN o:6.6 x 7e-s' // DIMSNSIDNS: comeACT: ESx 166• HANDICAP: a:1s LANDSCAPE LOT ACTUAL: 17.6% COVERAGE(EXISTING): REQUIRED: 167 it REQUEST FOR COMMENTS CITY CARD ' 62 Community�Deve[apment / ii4A 4642,0 ShapingA Better Community DATE: December 11,2002 VP i3 V ` 4 c ►tiFa TO: Tualatin Valley Water District Administrative Offices Oat, ] • 20Vi FROM: City of Tigard Planning Division ''j'ILAIT7ry y Wily-ER Dfs ALLEY STAFF CONTACT: "Morgan Tracy,Associate Planner(x24281 Phone: 1503)639-4111/F (5031614-1291 SITE DEVELOPMENT REVIEW ISDR}2002-00011 CASH 81 CARRY RETAIL STORE Q REQUEST: The applicant is requesting Site Development Review approval to convert an existing 32,380 square foot building from a furniture store (bulk sales use) to a discount grocery store (retail sales use) and future retail tenant space. Apart from re-striping the parking lot and minor facade changes, no ot'ier alterations are proposed. No variances or adjustments are proposed as well. LOCATION: 11745 SW Pacific Highway; WCTM 1S136CD, Tax Lot 1000. ZONE: C-G: General Commercial District. The C-G zoning district is designed to accommodate a full range of retail, office and civic uses with a City-wide and even regional trade area. Except where non-conforming, residential uses are limited to single-family residences which are located on the same site as a permitted use. A wide range of uses, including but not limited to adult entertainment, automotive equipment repair and storage, mini-warehouses, utilities, heliports, medical centers, major event entertainment, and gasoline stations, are permitted conditionally. APPLICABLE REVIEW CRITERIA: Community Development Code Chapters 18.360, 18.390, 18.520, 18.705, 18.725, 18.745, 18.755, 18.765, 18.780, 18.795 and 18.810. Attached are the Site Plan, Vicinity Map and Applicant's Materials for your review. From information supplied by various departments and agencies and from other information available to our staff, a report and recommendation will be prepared and a decision will be rendered on the .ro•osal in the near future. If you wish to comment on this application, ':',,L.41,1 4�tn,,,;L4 k:l*: -i bi til k,iii... aM ;.=ii z-iii6 g.i' f . ,. :;' ii aril' i You may use the space provided below or attach a separate letter to return your comments. If you are unable to respond by the above date, please phone the staff contact noted above with your comments and confirm your comments in writing as scon as possible. If you have any questions, contact the Tigard Planning Division, 13125 SW Hall Boulevard, Tigard, OR 97223. PL : ��HEC( THE FOLLOWING iT ` ; i ;i" h ' We have reviewed the proposal and have no objections to it. Please contact of our office. Please refer to the enclosed letter. Written comments provided below: — Name & Number of Person Commenting: k, I ./ ` ..../-7.4 J7 > t00E ONI21HaNIMR GMAI 9860 T65 E04 WA 55:IT NON ZO/EZ/Zl 12/26/02 13: 46 FAX 503640 3525 CLEAN WATER SERVICES [ZI001 REQUEST FOR COMMENTS CITY OFTIGego Community Develupmerl ShapingA Better Com.tm r DATE: December 11,2002 �U) '' ` J ' I]EC182002 1, 3 Air. rat)re) lee Walker,CleanWater Services/SWM Program -� J ay- R01flr TO City of Tigard Manning Division STAFF CONTACT: Morgan Tracy,Associate Planner[x24281 Phone: [5031 539-,14171/Fax: [5031684-1291 SITE DEVELOPMENT REVIEW MDR)2002-00017 ➢ CASH &CARRY RETAIL STORE Q REQUEST: The applicant is requesting Site Development Review approval to convert an existing 32 i80 square foot building from a furniture store (bulk sales use) to a discount grocery store (retail sales use Ind future retail tenant space. Apart from re-striping the parking lot and minor facade changes, no other alterst ms are proposed. No variances or adjustments are proposed as well. LOCATION: 11745 SW Pacific High ay; WCTM 1S136CD, Tax Lot 1000. ZONE: C-G: General Commercial District. The C-G zoning district is desic ied to accommodate a full range of retail, office and civic uses with a City-wide and even regional trade a ea. Except where non-conforming, residential uses are limited to single-family residences which are located or the same site as a permitted use. A wide range of uses, including but not limited to adult entertainment, autorrc .ive equipment repair and storage, mini-warehouses, utilities, heliports, medical centers, major event entertainer !nt, and gasoline stations, are permitted conditionally, APPLICABLE REVIEW CRITERIA: Comm city Development Code Chapters 18.360, 18.390, 18.520, 18.705, 18.725, 18.745, 18.755, 18.765, 18.780, 18 '95 and 18.810, Attached are the Site Plan, Vicinity Map and Applicant's Materials for your review. From information supplii by various departments and agencies and from other information available to our staff, a report and recommenc itiori will be prepared and a decision will be rendered on the pro•osal in the near future. If you wish to comment o this application, ;' -�a' '� � ti •-gig { .�i.L. T`�% airy, �o" -' :'� ."s,,.1 a may use the space pro ided �.�: r - u � `i:'-'t�, �,�'�� ' , '" - �� You ma us below or attach a separate letter to return your comments. If you are unable to respond by the above date, p !ase phone the staff contact noted above with your comments and confimi your comments in writing as soon as pos ible. If you have any questions, contact the Tigard Planning Division, 13125 SW Hall Boulevard, Tigard, OR 97223. tit` ¢vt, a ❑ t t,F IS F yy { I� S p ,. iii l"�S[��.,,!!r',tt ' �� ,F i...'4 intY ,,,�,., i?'il�. ,,, ,,, i;{A pi l �iridi�};1� .e'o�il,tl ti•i,..;i,(; li}s X�11� We have reviewed the proposal and have no objections to it. Please contact of our 1 ffice. Please refer to the enc ose a er. Written comments provided below: Name & Number of Person Commenting: g' /AA; „� i' a /ze/707 _ 1 MEMORANDUM CITY OF TIGARD, OREGON DATE: January 9, 2003 TO: Morgan Tracy, Associate Planner FROM: Brian Rager, Development Review Engineer RE: SDR 2002-00017, Cash & Carry Retail Store Access Management (Section 18.705.030.H) Section 18.705.030.H.1 states that an access report shall be submitted with all new development proposals which verifies design of driveways and streets are safe by meeting adequate stacking needs, sight distance and deceleration standards as set by ODOT, Washington County, the City and AASHTO. There is an existing full service driveway onto 99W for this site that has already been previously approved by ODOT. ODOT has reviewed this application and did not have concern with the continued use of the existing driveway. Section 18.705.030.H.2 states that driveways shall not be permitted to be placed in the influence area of collector or arterial street intersections. Influence area of intersections is that area where queues of traffic commonly form on approach to an intersection. The minimum driveway setback from a collector or arterial street intersection shall be150 feet, measured from the right-of-way line of the intersecting street to the throat of the proposed driveway. The setback may be greater depending upon the influence area, as determined from City Engineer review of a traffic impact report submitted by the applicant's traffic engineer. In a case where a project has less than 150 feet of street frontage, the applicant must explore any option for shared access with the adjacent parcel. If shared access is not possible or practical, the driveway shall be placed as far from the intersection as possible. The existing access onto 99W is approximately 600 feet from the intersection at Dartmouth/78th/99W, 425 feet from the Highway 217 off ramps, and approximately 175 feet from the beginning of the northbound Highway 217 onramp. Therefore, the existing access meets this criterion. Section 18.705.030.H.3 and 4 states that the minimum spacing of driveways and streets along a collector shall be 200 feet. The minimum spacing of driveways and streets along an arterial shall be 600 feet. The minimum spacing of local streets along a local street shall be 125 feet. ENGINEERING COMMENTS PAGE 1 The existing access onto 99W was previously approved by ODOT and continues to be acceptable to them for this use. Street And Utility Improvements Standards (Section 18.810): Chapter 18.810 provides construction standards for the implementation of public and private facilities and utilities such as streets, sewers, and drainage. The applicable standards are addressed below: Streets: Improvements: Section 18.810.030.A.1 states that streets within a development and streets adjacent shall be improved in accordance with the TDC standards. Section 18.810.030.A.2 states that any new street or additional street width planned as a portion of an existing street shall be dedicated and improved in accordance with the TDC. Minimum Rights-of-Way and Street Widths: Section 18.810.030.E requires an arterial street to have a 64-foot to 128-foot right-of-way width and a variable- width paved section. Other improvements required may include on-street parking, sidewalks and bikeways, underground utilities, street lighting, storm drainage, and street trees. This site lies adjacent to SW Pacific Highway, which is classified as a five-lane arterial on the City of Tigard Transportation Plan Map. There is adequate ROW adjacent to this site at present, and the roadway is fully improved. No additional dedications or improvements will be required by ODOT. Sidewalks: Section 18.810.070.A requires that sidewalks be constructed to meet City design standards and be located on both sides of arterial, collector and local residential streets. Private streets and industrial streets shall have sidewalks on at least one side. There is a concrete sidewalk along Pacific Highway that meets this criterion. Sanitary Sewers: Sewers Required: Section 18.810.090.A requires that sanitary sewer be installed to serve each new development and to connect developments to existing mains in accordance with the provisions set forth in Design and Construction Standards for Sanitary and Surface Water Management (as ENGINEERING COMMENTS PAGE 2 adopted by Clean Water Services in 1996 and including any future revisions or amendments) and the adopted policies of the comprehensive plan. Over-sizing: Section 18.810.090.0 states that proposed sewer systems shall include consideration of additional development within the area as projected by the Comprehensive Plan. Sewer is provided by a main line in Pacific Highway. No additional public sewer line improvements are needed to support this development. Storm Drainage: General Provisions: Section 18.810.100.A states requires developers to make adequate provisions for storm water and flood water runoff. Accommodation of Upstream Drainage: Section 18.810.100.0 states that a culvert or other drainage facility shall be large enough to accommodate potential runoff from its entire upstream drainage area, whether inside or outside the development. The City Engineer shall approve the necessary size of the facility, based on the provisions of Design and Construction Standards for Sanitary and Surface Water Management (as adopted by Clean Water Services in 2000 and including any future revisions or amendments). There are no existing upstream drainage areas that affect this site. Effect on Downstream Drainage: Section 18.810.100.D states that where it is anticipated by the City Engineer that the additional runoff resulting from the development will overload an existing drainage facility, the Director and Engineer shall withhold approval of the development until provisions have been made for improvement of the potential condition or until provisions have been made for storage of additional runoff caused by the development in accordance with the Design and Construction Standards for Sanitary and Surface Water Management (as adopted by Clean Water Services in 2000 and including any future revisions or amendments). Since there will not be an increase in impervious areas on the site, this section will not apply. Bikeways and Pedestrian Pathways: Bikeway Extension: Section 18.810.110.A states that developments adjoining proposed bikeways identified on the City's adopted ENGINEERING COMMENTS PAGE 3 pedestrian/bikeway plan shall include provisions for the future extension of such bikeways through the dedication of easements or right-of-way. Pacific Highway is classified as a bike facility and presently has the width for bike lanes. ADDITIONAL CITY AND/OR AGENCY CONCERNS WITH STREET AND UTILITY IMPROVEMENT STANDARDS: Public Water System: This site is presently served by the Tualatin Valley Water District (TVWD). No additional public water line work is needed to support this development. Storm Water Quality: The City has agreed to enforce Surface Water Management (SWM) regulations established by Clean Water Services (CWS) Design and Construction Standards (adopted by Resolution and Order No. 00-7) which require the construction of on-site water quality facilities. The facilities shall be designed to remove 65 percent of the phosphorus contained in 100 percent of the storm water runoff generated from newly created impervious surfaces. In addition, a maintenance plan shall be submitted indicating the frequency and method to be used in keeping the facility maintained through the year. Since there are no additional impervious areas being created, this section will not apply. Address Assignments: The City of Tigard is responsible for assigning addresses for parcels within the City of Tigard and within the Urban Service Boundary (USB). An addressing fee in the amount of $ 30.00 per address shall be assessed. This fee shall be paid to the City prior to issuance of the building permit. For multi-tenant buildings, one address number is assigned to the building and then all tenant spaces are given suite numbers. The City is responsible for assigning the main address and suite numbers. This information is needed so that building permits for tenant improvements can be adequately tracked in the City's permit tracking system. Based upon the information provided by the applicant, this building will be a multi-tenant building. Prior to issuance of the site permit, the applicant shall provide a suite layout map so suite numbers can be assigned. The addressing fee will then be calculated based upon the number of ENGINEERING COMMENTS PAGE 4 suites that must be addressed. In multi-level structures, ground level suites shall have numbers preceded by a "1", second level suites shall have numbers preceded by a "2", etc. COMMENTS FROM THE PUBLIC: A letter was received from Welkin Engineering, P.C., dated December 31, 2002. Two comments were made in the letter which will be addressed by Engineering. First, Welkin cited 18.705 and stated that the 451 additional daily trips from this development will cause the eastbound lane of Pfaffle Street at 78th Avenue to back up even more than it does now at peak times. Welkin states that the City should require the applicant to provide a parking lot access connection between the subject site and the properties to the west that were approved by SDR 1999- 00024 (Welkin) and SDR 2001-00010 (Cameron Plaza). Since primary access to the subject site is from the driveway on Pacific Highway, Staff is not convinced that the traffic on Pfaffle Street will experience significant growth. ODOT has reviewed this application and found that the proposed use is consistent with the previous use and the surrounding uses. Staff also spoke directly with ODOT staff to get their views on a parking lot connection, as there would be more traffic entering Pacific Highway through the site driveway. ODOT stated that the existing driveway onto Pacific Highway already serves three parcels that generate substantial traffic. ODOT is not in favor of increasing the use of that driveway to serve two additional parcels. Therefore, Staff recommends against a parking lot connection to the west. Welkin also cited 18.810 and stated that the impact area was not fully addressed. They stated that because of the additional traffic from this change in use, the intersection at 78th Avenue/Pacific Highway/Dartmouth Street should be reviewed for additional widening. Again, Staff is not convinced that there will be significant traffic added to that intersection because of this development. The primary access to this site is from a separate driveway onto Pacific Highway that allows for the full range of turning movements. In addition, ODOT controls the intersection reference by Welkin and did not recommend further analysis. Therefore, Staff maintains that the impact area for this development has been adequately addressed by all affected agencies, and no further analysis is necessary. Recommendations: THE FOLLOWING CONDITIONS SHALL BE SATISFIED PRIOR TO ISSUANCE OF THE BUILDING PERMIT: ENGINEERING COMMENTS PAGE 5 Submit to the Engineering Department (Brian Rager, 639-4171, ext. 318) for review and approval: Prior to issuance of the building permit, the applicant shall submit a suite layout map to Shirley Treat, Engineering Department. If the applicant is not sure how many suites will be used, they must estimate a number. The City will then assign suite numbers and the address fee will then be calculated. The fee must be paid by the applicant prior to issuance of the building permit. (STAFF CONTACT: Shirley Treat, Engineering). 1\tig333\usr\depts\eng\brianr\comments\sdr\sdr2002-00017.doc ENGINEERING COMMENTS PAGE 6 REQUEST FOR COMMENTS CITY TY OFTIGARD Community Development Shaping A Better Community DATE: December 11,2002 RECEIVED PLANNING TO: Jim Wolf,Tigard Police Department Crime Prevention Officer DE; 18 2001 FROM: City of Tigard Planning Division crr(C.:TICARD STAFF CONTACT: Morgan Tracy,Associate Planner(x24281 Phone: 1503)639-4111/Fax: [5031684-1291 SITE DEVELOPMENT REVIEW MDR]2002-00017 CASH &CARRY RETAIL STORE — REQUEST: The applicant is requesting Site Development Review approval to convert an existing 32,380 square foot building from a furniture store (bulk sales use) to a discount grocery store (retail sales use) and future retail tenant space. Apart from re-striping the parking lot and minor façade changes, no other alterations are proposed. No variances or adjustments are proposed as well. LOCATION: 11745 SW Pacific Highway; WCTM 1S136CD, Tax Lot 1000. ZONE: C-G: General Commercial District. The C-G zoning district is designed to accommodate a full range of retail, office and civic uses with a City-wide and even regional trade area. Except where non-conforming, residential uses are limited to single-family residences which are located on the same site as a permitted use. A wide range of uses, including but not limited to adult entertainment, automotive equipment repair and storage, mini-warehouses, utilities, heliports, medical centers, major event entertainment, and gasoline stations, are permitted conditionally. APPLICABLE REVIEW CRITERIA: Community Development Code Chapters 18.360, 18.390, 18.520, 18.705, 18.725, 18.745, 18.755, 18.765, 18.780, 18.795 and 18.810. Attached are the Site Plan, Vicinity Map and Applicant's Materials for your review. From information supplied by various departments and agencies and from other information available to our staff, a report and recommendation will be prepared and a decision will be rendered on the proposal in the near future. If you wish to comment on this application, WE NEED YOUR COMMENTS BACK BY: DECEMBER 31, 2002. You may use the space provided below or attach a separate letter to return your comments. If you are unable to respond by the above date, please phone the staff contact noted above with your comments and confirm your comments in writing as soon as possible. If you have any questions, contact the Tigard Planning Division, 13125 SW Hall Boulevard, Tigard, OR 97223. PASE CHECK THE FOLLOWING ITEMS THAT APPLY: We have reviewed the proposal and have no objections to it. Please contact of our office. Please refer to the enclosed letter. Written comments provided below: Name & Number of Person Commenting: W6 x 2-91 _ . REQUEST FOR COMMENTS CITYO TIOARD Community cDevetopment Shaping Better Community DATE: December 11,2002 RECEIVED PLANNING TO: Matt Stine,Urban Forester/Public Works Annex DEC 1 7 2002 FROM: City of Tigard Planning Division CITY C, TI^ARD STAFF CONTACT: Morgan Tracy,Associate Planner[x24281 Phone: (503)639-4171/Fax: [5031684-1297 SITE DEVELOPMENT REVIEW MDR)2002-00017 CASH & CARRY RETAIL STORE REQUEST: The applicant is requesting Site Development Review approval to convert an existing 32,380 square foot building from a furniture store (bulk sales use) to a discount grocery store (retail sales use) and future retail tenant space. Apart from re-striping the parking lot and minor facade changes, no other alterations are proposed. No variances or adjustments are proposed as well. LOCATION: 11745 SW Pacific Highway; WCTM 1S136CD, Tax Lot 1000. ZONE: C-G: General Commercial District. The C-G zoning district is designed to accommodate a full range of retail, office and civic uses with a City-wide and even regional trade area. Except where non-conforming, residential uses are limited to single-family residences which are located on the same site as a permitted use. A wide range of uses, including but not limited to adult entertainment, automotive equipment repair and storage, mini-warehouses, utilities, heliports, medical centers, major event entertainment, and gasoline stations, are permitted conditionally. APPLICABLE REVIEW CRITERIA: Community Development Code Chapters 18.360, 18.390, 18.520, 18.705, 18.725, 18.745, 18.755, 18.765, 18.780, 18.795 and 18.810. Attached are the Site Plan, Vicinity Map and Applicant's Materials for your review. From information supplied by various departments and agencies and from other information available to our staff, a report and recommendation will be prepared and a decision will be rendered on the proposal in the near future. If you wish to comment on this application, WE NEED YOUR COMMENTS BACK BY: DECEMBER 31, 2002. You may use the space provided below or attach a separate letter to return your comments. If you are unable to respond by the above date, please phone the staff contact noted above with your comments and confirm your comments in writing as soon as possible. If you have any questions, contact the Tigard Planning Division, 13125 SW Hall Boulevard, Tigard, OR 97223. PLEASE CHECK THE FOLLOWING ITEMS THAT APPLY: We have reviewed the proposal and have no objections to it. Please contact of our office. Please refer to the enclosed letter. A Written comments provided below: (7 OM Tit er PAP AN& PA 4.144 51AEC3f 0 4 w 0i esc.A#I h 14 A tiE*t. -ty coma(7144,1? STATE OM ACr) -ro 'TREE - : NONE 71.r 5774-x- .50. Name & Number of Person Commenting: REQUEST FOR COMMENTS CITY OF TIGARD Community(Development Shaping Better Community DATE: December 11,2002 RECEIVED PLANNING TO: Y'Agin Roy,Property Manager/Public Works Annex FROM: City of Tigard Planning Division co 1 7 2002 !,,TY C;-TICARD STAFF CONTACT: Morgan Tracy,Associate Planner[x24281 Phone: [503)639-4111/Fax: [5031684-1291 SITE DEVELOPMENT REVIEW[SDRI 2002-00011 CASH &CARRY RETAIL STORE REQUEST: The applicant is requesting Site Development Review approval to convert an existing 32,380 square foot building from a furniture store (bulk sales use) to a discount grocery store (retail sales use) and future retail tenant space. Apart from re-striping the parking lot and minor facade changes, no other alterations are proposed. No variances or adjustments are proposed as well. LOCATION: 11745 SW Pacific Highway; WCTM 1S136CD, Tax Lot 1000. ZONE: C-G: General Commercial District. The C-G zoning district is designed to accommodate a full range of retail, office and civic uses with a City-wide and even regional trade area. Except where non-conforming, residential uses are limited to single-family residences which are located on the same site as a permitted use. A wide range of uses, including but not limited to adult entertainment, automotive equipment repair and storage, mini-warehouses, utilities, heliports, medical centers, major event entertainment, and gasoline stations, are permitted conditionally. APPLICABLE REVIEW CRITERIA: Community Development Code Chapters 18.360, 18.390, 18.520, 18.705, 18.725, 18.745, 18.755, 18.765, 18.780, 18.795 and 18.810. Attached are the Site Plan, Vicinity Map and Applicant's Materials for your review. From information supplied by various departments and agencies and from other information available to our staff, a report and recommendation will be prepared and a decision will be rendered on the proposal in the near future. If you wish to comment on this application, WE NEED YOUR COMMENTS BACK BY: DECEMBER 31, 2002. You may use the space provided below or attach a separate letter to return your comments. If you are unable to respond by the above date, please phone the staff contact noted above with your comments and confirm your comments in writing as soon as possible. If you have any questions, contact the Tigard Planning Division, 13125 SW Hall Boulevard, Tigard, OR 97223. PLEASE CHECK THE FOLLOWING ITEMS THAT APPLY: We have reviewed the proposal and have no objections to it. Please contact of our office. Please refer to the enclosed letter. Written comments provided below: Name & Number of Person Commenting: - REQUEST FOR COMMENTS cI I'GARD Community Development Shaping A Better Community DATE: December 11,2002 TO: PER ATTACHED FROM: City of Tigard Planning Division STAFF CONTACT: Morgan Tracy,Associate Planner[x24281 Phone: (503)639-4111/Fax: (5031684-1291 SITE DEVELOPMENT REVIEW MDR)2002-00017 CASH & CARRY RETAIL STORE — REQUEST: The applicant is requesting Site Development Review approval to convert an existing 32,380 square foot building from a furniture store (bulk sales use) to a discount grocery store (retail sales use) and future retail tenant space. Apart from re-striping the parking lot and minor façade changes, no other alterations are proposed. No variances or adjustments are proposed as well. LOCATION: 11745 SW Pacific Highway; WCTM 1S136CD, Tax Lot 1000. ZONE: C-G: General Commercial District. The C-G zoning district is designed to accommodate a full range of retail, office and civic uses with a City-wide and even regional trade area. Except where non-conforming, residential uses are limited to single-family residences which are located on the same site as a permitted use. A wide range of uses, including but not limited to adult entertainment, automotive equipment repair and storage, mini-warehouses, utilities, heliports, medical centers, major event entertainment, and gasoline stations, are permitted conditionally. APPLICABLE REVIEW CRITERIA: Community Development Code Chapters 18.360, 18.390, 18.520, 18.705, 18.725, 18.745, 18.755, 18.765, 18.780, 18.795 and 18.810. Attached are the Site Plan, Vicinity Map and Applicant's Materials for your review. From information supplied by various departments and agencies and from other information available to our staff, a report and recommendation will be prepared and a decision will be rendered on the proposal in the near future. If you wish to comment on this application, WE NEED YOUR COMMENTS BACK BY: DECEMBER 31, 2002. You may use the space provided below or attach a separate letter to return your comments. If you are unable to respond by the above date, please phone the staff contact noted above with your comments and confirm your comments in writing as soon as possible. If you have any questions, contact the Tigard Planning Division, 13125 SW Hall Boulevard, Tigard, OR 97223. PLEASE CHECK THE FOLLOWING ITEMS THAT APPLY: We have reviewed the proposal and have no objections to it. Please contact of our office. Please refer to the enclosed letter. Written comments provided below: Name & Number of Person Commenting: CITY TIGARD REQUEST FOR CON :NTS .A' NOTIFICATION LIST FOR LAND USE & COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT APPLICATIONS () - FILE NOS.: )i..2U%L — UD() t7 FILE NAME: t CITIZEN INVOLVEMENT TEAMS 14-DAY PENDING APPLICATION NOTICE TO CIT AREA: ['Central El‘ast ❑South ['West OProposal Descrip.in Library CIT Book CITY OFFICES //////''' ,LONG RANGE PLANNING/Barbara Shields,Planning Mgr. FOMMUNITY DVLPMNT.DEPT./Planning-Engineering Techs. OLICE DEPT./Jim Wolf,Crime Prevention Officer BUILDING DIVISION/Gary Lampella,Building Official ENGINEERING DEPT./Brian Rager,Dvlpmnt.Review Engineer ATER DEPT./Dennis Koellermeier,Operations Mgr. _CITY ADMINISTRATION/Cathy Wheatley,City Recorder PUBLIC WORKS/John Roy,Property Manager _pUBLIC WORKS/Matt Stine,Urban Forester ✓PLANNER—POST PROJECT SITE IF A PUBLIC HEARING ITEM-10 BUSINESS DAYS PRIOR TO THE PUBLIC HEARING! C.D./Sherman Casper,Permit Coord.ISDR/cuP re TIF) SPECIAL DISTRICTS _ TUAL.HILLS PARK&REC.DIST.*_ TUALATIN TUALATIN VALLEY FIRE&RESCUE ♦ 'TUALATIN VALLEY WATER DISTRICT* .CLEANWATER SERVICES Planning Manager Fire Marshall Administrative Office Lee Walker/SWM Program 15707 SW Walker Road Washington County Fire District PO Box 745 155 N.First Avenue Beaverton,OR 97006 (place in pick-up box) Beaverton.OR 97075 Hillsboro,OR 97124 LOCAL AND STATE JURISDICTIONS CITY OF BEAVERTON * _ CITY OF TUALATIN * _OR.DEPT.OF FISH&WILDLIFE _OR.DIV.OF STATE LANDS Planning Manager Planning Manager 2501 SW First Avenue Jennifer Goodridge _ Irish Bunnell,Development Services PO Box 369 PO Box 59 775 Summer Street NE PO Box 4755 Tualatin,OR 97062 Portland,OR 97207 Salem,OR 97301-1279 Beaverton,OR 97076 OR.PUB.UTILITIES COMM. METRO-LAND USE&PLANNING * _OR.DEPT.OF GEO.&MINERAL IND. 550 Capitol Street NE CITY OF DURHAM (IF 600 NE Grand Avenue 800 NE Oregon Street,Suite 5 Salem,OR 97310-1380 City Manager Portland,OR 97232-2736 Portland,OR 97232 PO Box 23483 _ Bob Knight,Data Resource Center(zCA) _US ARMY CORPS.OF ENG. Durham,OR 97281-3483 _ Paulette Allen,Growth Management Coordinator _OR.DEPT.OF LAND CONSERV.&DVLP. Kathryn Harris Mel Huie,Greenspaces Coordinator(cpNzoA) Larry French(Comp.Plan Amendments Only) Routing CENWP-OP-G _CITY OF KING CITY * _ Jennifer Budhabhatti,Regional Planner(Wetlands) 635 Capitol Street NE,Suite 150 PO Box 2946 City Manager _ C.D.Manager,Growth Management Services Salem,OR 97301-2540 Portland,OR 97208-2946 15300 SW 116th Avenue King City,OR 97224 WASHINGTON COUNTY t* _ OR.DEPT.OF ENERGY(POwedines in Area) _OREGON DEPT.OF TRANS.(ODOT) Dept.of Land Use&Transp. Bonneville Power Administration Aeronautics Division(Monopole Towers) 155 N. First Avenue _CITY OF LAKE OSWEGO * Routing TTRC—Attn: Renae Ferrera Tom Highland,Planning Suite 350,MS 13 Planning Director PO Box 3621 3040 25th Street,SE Hillsboro,OR 97124 PO Box 369 Portland,OR 97208-3621 Salem,OR 97310 _Brent Curtis(cpA) Lake Oswego,OR 97034 ! _ Jj Gregg Leion(CPA) _ OR.DEPT.OF ENVIRON.QUALITY(DEQ) V6DOT,REGION 1 * A fit Qttnic S0,1 _Anne LaMountain(IGA/URB) _CITY OF PORTLAND (Notify for Wetlands and Potential Environmental Impacts) _Sonya Kazen,Development Review Coordinator Phil Healy(IGA/URB) David Knowles,Planning Bureau Dir. Regional Administrator _Carl Toland, Right-of-Way Section(vaOa+lons) _Steve Conway(General Apps.) Portland Building 106,Rm. 1002 2020 SW Fourth Avenue,Suite 400 123 NW Flanders Sr.Cartographer(ce,vzu)res t. 1120 SW Fifth Avenue Portland,OR 97201-4987 Portland,OR 97209-4037 _Jim Nims(zcA)Ms is Portland,OR 97204 _Doria Mateja(ZCA)Ms 14 WCCCA(911)(Monopoie Towers) _ODOT,REGION 1 -DISTRICT 2A Dave Austin Jane Estes,Permit Specialist 17911 NW Evergreen Parkway 5440 SW Westgate Drive,Suite 350 Beaverton,OR 97006 Portland,OR 97221-2414 UTILITY PROVIDERS AND SPECIAL AGENCIES _PORTLAND WESTERN R/R, BURLINGTON NORTHERN/SANTA FE R/R,OREGON ELECTRIC R/R(Burlington Northern/Santa Fe R/R Predecessor) Robert I.Melbo,President&General Manager 110 W. 10th Avenue Albany,OR 97321 _SOUTHERN PACIFIC TRANS.CO.R/R _METRO AREA COMMUNICATIONS _SAT&T CABLE _TRI-MET TRANSIT DVLPMT. Clifford C.Cabe,Construction Engineer Debra Palmer(Annexations Only) Pat McGann (If Project is Within V.Mile of A Transit Route) 5424 SE McLoughlin Boulevard Twin Oaks Technology Center 14200 SW Brigadoon Court Ben Baldwin,Project Planner Portland,OR 97232 1815 NW 169th Place,S-6020 Beaverton,OR 97005 710 NE Holladay Street averton,OR 97006-4886 J Portland,OR 97232 ✓PORTLAND GENERAL ELECTRIC _NW NATURAL GAS COMPANY i�ERIZON QWEST COMMUNICATIONS Jim VanKleek,Svc.Design Consultant Scott Palmer,Engineering Coord. Ken Perdue,Engineering Jeri Cella,Engineering 9480 SW Boeckman Road 220 NW Second Avenue PO Box 1100 8021 SW Capitol Hill Rd,Rm 110 Wilsonville,OR 97070 Portland,OR 97209-3991 Beaverton,OR 970/5-1100 /Portland,OR 97219 _TIGARD/TUALATIN SCHOOL DIST.#23J_BEAVERTON SCHOOL DIST.#48 ✓ AT&T CABLE ieee,Ertrt,tOrt0 wl Marsha Butler,Administrative Offices Jan Youngquist,Demographics&Planning Dept. Diana Carpenter 6960 SW Sandburg Street 16550 SW Merlo Road 3500 SW Bond Street Tigard,OR 97223-8039 Beaverton,OR 97006-5152 Portland,OR 97232 • INDICATES AUTOMATIC NOTIFICATION IN COMPLIANCE WITH INTERGOVERNMENTAL AGREEMENT IF WITHIN 500' OF THE SUBJECT PROPERTY FOR ANY/ALL CITY PROJECTS (Project Planner Is Responsible For Indicating Parties To Notify). ti\patty\rnasters\Request For Comments Notification List 2.doc (Revised 8-Mar-02) MAILING RECORDS r Y AFFIDAVIT OF POSTING NOTICE OF A LAND USE PROPOSAL R HIS AFFIDAVIT MUST BE ACCOMPANIED BX A G Y F T[CE T WA.e.0STED P t 3 t'e In the Matter of the Proposed Land Use Applications for: Land Use File Nos.: SDR2002-00017 Land Use File Name: CASH & CARRY RETAIL STORE I, Morgan Tracy, Associate Planner for the City of Tigard, do affirm that I posted notice of the land use proposal affecting the land located at (state the approxi ate location(s) IF no address(s) and/or tax lot(s) currently registered) 11 715" (,t/ and did personally post notice of the proposed land use appli ation(s) by means of weatherproof posting in the general vicinity of the affected territ9ry, a copy of said notice being hereto attached and by reference made a part hereof, on the 1 ! day of ?''►1-14/ , 2002. ' "^M Signature o Person Who o Pert rmed Posting (In the presence of the Notary) (THIS SECTION FOR A STATE OF OREGON, NOTARY PUBLIC TO COMPLETE/NOTARIZE) STATE OF OREGON ) County of Washington ) ss. Subscribed and sworn/affirmed before me on the 5 day of re h. , 20 63 . OFFICIAL SEAL SHERMAN S.C CR .I . .'" Ncoorr PUBUC.OR� NOTARY PUBLIC OF ORE ON MY COMMISSION BORES 31 2003 /3' � My Commission Expires: h:\login\patty\masters\affidavit of posting for applicant to post public hearing.doc CASH & CARRY RETAIL STORE SITE DEVELOPMENT REVIEW (SDR) 2002-00017 REQUEST: The applicant is requesting Site Development Review approval to convert an existing 32,380 square foot building from a furniture store (bulk sales use) to a discount grocery store (retail sales use) and future retail tenant space. " part from re-striping the parking lot and minor façade changes, no other alterations are proposed. No variances or adjustments are proposed as well. LOCATION : 11745 SW Pacific Highway; WCTM 1S136CD, Tax Lot 1000. ZONE: C-G: General Commercial District. The C-G zoning district is designed to accommodate a full range of retail, office and civic uses with a City-wide and even regional trade area. Except where non-conforming, residential uses are limited to single-family residences which are located on the same site as a permitted use. A wide range of uses, including but not limited to adult entertainment, automotive equipment repair and storage, mini-warehouses, utilities, heliports, medical inters, major event entertainment, and gasoline stations, are permitted conditionally. APPLICABLE REVIEW CRITERIA: Community Development Code Chapters 18.360, 18.390, 18.520, 18.705, 18.725, 18.745, 18.755, 18.765, 18.780, 18.795 and 18.810. Further information may be obtained from the Planning Division (staff contact: Morgan Tracy, Associate Planner) at 13125 SW Hall Blvd., Tigard, Oregon 97223, or by calling 503-639-4171 . A copy of the application and all documents and evidence submitted by or on be!,ialf of the applicant and the applicable criteria are available for inspection at no cost and copies for all items can also be provided at a reasonable cost. AFFIDAVIT OF POSTING NOTICE OF A LAND USE PROPOSAL IMPORTANT NOTICE: THIS AFFIDAVIT MUST BE ACCOMPANIED BY A COPY OF THE NOTICE THAT WAS POSTED ON THE SITE. In the Matter of the Proposed Land Use Applications for: Land Use File Nos.: SDR2002-00017 Land Use File Name: "APPEAL" OF CASH & CARRY STORES I, Morgan Tracy, Associate Planner for the City of Tigard, do affirm that I posted notice of the land use proposal affecting the land located at (state the approximate location(s) IF no address(s) and/or tax lot(s) currently registered) 117'1S Sir/ Fax-1A L.. HI y11"/ and did personally post notice of the proposed land use aplication(s) by means of weatherproof posting in the general vicinity of the affected territory, a copy of said notice being hereto attached and by reference made a part hereof, on the `3, 5, day of -7.-LA , 2003. Signature 6f Person Who `erformed Posting (In the presence of the Notary) (THIS SECTION FOR A STATE OF OREGON, NOTARY PUBLIC TO COMPLETE/NOTARIZE) STATE OF OREGON ) County of Washington ) ss. Subscribed and sworn/affirmed before me on the day of Feb , 20 3 . `s - OFFICIAL SEAL RR. SHERMAN S.CASPER - NOTARY PUBLIC-OREGON 4 COMMISSION RE MAY ✓NOTARY PUBLIC OF OREGON MY COMMISSION EXPIRES'.1AY 13,2003 My Commission Expires: it(t / 13, 2007 h\login\patty\masters\affidavit of posting for applicant to post public hearing.doc APPEAL OF CASH C CARRY STORES SITE DEVELOPMENT REVIEW (SDR) 2002-00017 ITEM ON APPEAL: On January 22, 2003, the Director issued a decision to approve a request for Site Development Review approval to convert an existing 32,380 square foot building from a furniture store (bulk sales use) to a discount grocery store (retail ales use) and future retail tenant space. Apart from re-striping the parking lot and minor façade changes, no other alterations are proposed. On January 24, 2003 an appeal was filed concerning the imposition of two conditions of approval: Condition #1 which requires a pedestrian easement to the abutting property to the north, and Condition #3 which requires a reciprocal access easement for vehicles provided that the Oregon Department of Transportation approves of such a connection. LOCATION : 11745 SW Pacific Highway; WCTM 1 S136CD, Tax Lot 1000. ZONE: C-G: General Commercial District. REVIEW CRITERIA BEING APPEALED: Community Development Code Chapters 18.705 and 18.810. Tree TIGARD HEARINGS OFFICER will hold a public hearing to consider this application on WEDNESDAY FEBRUARY 19, 2003 at 7:00 PM at the Tigard Civic Center - Town Hall, 13125 SW Hall Blvd., Tigard, Oregon. Both public oral and written testimony is invited. The public hearing on this matter will be conducted in accordance with Chapter 18.390 of the Tigard Municipal Code, and the rules of procedures adopted by the Hearings Officer. Testimony may be submitted in writing prior to or at the public hearing or verbally at the public hearing only. Failure to raise an issue in person or by letter at some point prior to the close of the hearing accompanied by statements or evidence sufficient to afford the decision-maker an opportunity to respond to the issue precludes appeal to the Land Use Board of Appeal based on that issue and failure to specify the criterion from the Community Development Code or Comprehensive Plan at which a comment is directed precludes an appeal based on that criterion. Further information may be obtained from the Planning Division (staff contact: Morgan Tracy) at 13125 SW Hall Blvd., Tigard, Oregon 97223, or'by calling 503-639-4171. A copy of the application and all documents and evidence submitted by or on behalf of the applicant and the applicable criteria are available for inspection at no cost. A copy of the staff report will be made available for inspection at no cost at least seven (7)'days prior to the hearing, and copies for all items can also be provided at a reasonable cost. AFFIDAVIT OF MAILING IX. CITY OF TGAtk„, ARD Community(Development Shaping Better Community I, Patricia L. Lunsford, being first duly sworn/affirm, on oath depose and say that I am a Senior Administrative Specialist for the City of gigarac'Washington County, Oregon and that I served the following: {Check Appopaate Box(s)Below) ® NOTICE OF PUBLIC HEARING FOR: sdr2002-00017/"APPEAL" OF CASH & CARRY STORES (211912003) File No/Name Reference) (Date of Public Heanng) City of Tigard Planning Director Z Tigard Hearings Officer — Tigard Planning Commission Tigard City Council A copy of the said notice being hereto attached, marked Exhibit"A", and by reference made a part hereof, was mailed to each named person(s) at the address(s) shown on the attached list(s), marked Exhibit"B", and by reference made a part hereof, on January 28,2003, and deposited in the United States Mail on January 28,2003, postage prepaid. (_) (Person that Pre. red Notice) STATE. of oEGoW ) County of Washington )ss. City of Tigard ) Subscribed and sworn/affirmed before me on the � day of 7A 44,L , 2003. OFFICIAL SEAL DIANE M JELDERKS NOTARY P°UBt.�:. F 5?N i COM►J"c MY COMMISSION f o ,20(13 I.a.�L /4i My Commission !n: OFFICIAL SEAL DIANE M.IELDERKS ' NOTARY PUBLIC-OREGON COMMISSION .326578 MY COMMISSION EXPIREN0S SEPT.07,2003 NOTICE TO MORTGAGEE, LIENHOLDER,VENDOR OR SELLER: EXHIBIT THE TIGARD DEVELOPMENT CODE REQUIRES THAT IF YOU RECEIVE THIS NOTICE, IT SHALL BE PROMPTLY FORWARDED TO THE PURCHASER 11,4`1' CITY OF TIGARD Community Deveropnzent Shaping Better Community PUBLIC NEARING NOTICE NOTICE IS HEREBY GIVEN THAT THE TIGARD HEARINGS OFFICER,AT A MEETING ON WEDNESDAY, FEBRUARY 19, 2003 AT 7:00 PM, IN THE TOWN HALL OF THE TIGARD CIVIC CENTER AT 13125 SW HALL BOULEVARD, TIGARD, OREGON 97223, WILL CONSIDER THE FOLLOWING APPLICATION: FILE NO.: SITE DEVELOPMENT REVIEW (SDR) 2002-00017 FILE TITLE: "APPEAL" OF CASH & CARRY STORE APPLICANT: Smart & Final Stores OWNER: Monaghan Farms, Inc. Attn: Fernando Gallarzo Attn: Tom Deline 600 Citadel Drive 14120 East Evans Avenue Los Angeles, CA 90040 Aurora, CO 80014 ITEM ON APPEAL: On January 22, 2003, the Director issued a decision to approve a request for Site Development Review approval to convert an existing 32,380 square foot building from a furniture store (bulk sales use) to a discount grocery store (retail sales use) and future retail tenant space. Apart from re-striping the parking lot and minor facade changes, no other alterations are proposed. On January 24, 2003 an appeal was filed concerning the imposition of two conditions of approval: Condition #1 which requires a pedestrian easement to the abutting property to the north, and Condition #3 which requires a reciprocal access easement for vehicles provided that the Oregon Department of Transportation approves of such a connection. LOCATION: 11745 SW Pacific Highway; WCTM 1S136CD, Tax Lot 1000. ZONE: C-G: General Commercial District. The C-G zoning district is designed to accommodate a full range of retail, office and civic uses with a City-wide and even regional trade area. Except where non-conforming, residential uses are limited to single-family residences which are located on the same site as a permitted use. A wide range of uses, including but not limited to adult entertainment, automotive equipment repair and storage, mini-warehouses, utilities, heliports, medical centers, major event entertainment, and gasoline stations, are permitted conditionally. REVIEW CRITERIA BEING APPEALED: Community Development Code Chapters 18.705 and 18.810. THE PUBLIC HEARING ON THIS MATTER WILL BE CONDUCTED IN ACCORDANCE WITH THE RULES OF CHAPTER 18.390 OF THE COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT CODE AND RULES OF PROCEDURE ADOPTED BY THE TIGARD HEARINGS OFFICER AND CITY COUNCIL AND AVAILABLE AT CITY HALL. ASSISTIVE LISTENING DEVICES ARE AVAILABLE FOR PERSONS WITH IMPAIRED HEARING. THE CITY WILL ALSO ENDEAVOR TO ARRANGE FOR QUALIFIED SIGN LANGUAGE INTERPRETERS AND QUALIFIED BILINGUAL INTERPRETERS UPON REQUEST. PLEASE CALL (503) 639-4171 , EXT. 2438 (VOICE) OR (503) 684-2772 (TDD - TELECOMMUNICATIONS DEVICES OR THE DEAF) NO LESS THAN ONE WEEK PRIOR TO THE HEARING TO MAKE ARRANGEMENTS. ANYONE WISHING TO PRESET ,VRITTEN TESTIMONY ON THIS .OPOSED ACTION MAY DO SO IN WRITING PRIOR TO OR AT THE PUBLIC HEARING. ORAL TESTIMONY MAY BE PRESENTED AT THE PUBLIC HEARING. AT THE PUBLIC HEARING, THE HEARINGS OFFICER WILL RECEIVE A STAFF REPORT PRESENTATION FROM THE CITY PLANNER, OPEN THE PUBLIC HEARING, AND INVITE BOTH ORAL AND WRITTEN TESTIMONY. THE HEARINGS OFFICER MAY CONTINUE THE PUBLIC HEARING TO ANOTHER MEETING TO OBTAIN ADDITIONAL INFORMATION OR CLOSE THE PUBLIC HEARING AND TAKE ACTION ON THE APPLICATION. IF A PERSON SUBMITS EVIDENCE OR DOCUMENTS LESS THAN 7 DAYS PRIOR TO THE PUBLIC HEARING DATE, THE HEARINGS AUTHORITY MAY ALLOW A CONTINUANCE OF THE HEARING, SUBJECT TO ORS 215.428 OR 227.178. IF THERE IS NO CONTINUANCE GRANTED AT THE HEARING, ANY PARTICIPANT IN THE HEARING MAY REQUEST THAT THE RECORD REMAIN OPEN FOR AT LEAST SEVEN (7) DAYS AFTER THE HEARING. A REQUEST THAT THE RECORD REMAIN OPEN CAN BE MADE ONLY AT THE FIRST EVIDENTIARY HEARING (ORS 197.763(6). INCLUDED IN THIS NOTICE IS A LIST OF APPROVAL CRITERIA APPLICABLE TO THE REQUEST FROM THE TIGARD COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT CODE AND THE TIGARD COMPREHENSIVE PLAN. APPROVAL OR DISAPPROVAL OF THE REQUEST BY THE HEARINGS OFFICER WILL BE BASED UPON THE CRITERIA LISTED OR OTHER CRITERIA IN THE COMPREHENSIVE PLAN OR DEVELOPMENT CODE WHICH THE PERSON BELIEVES TO APPLY TO THE DECISION. AT THE HEARING IT IS IMPORTANT THAT COMMENTS RELATING TO THE REQUEST PERTAIN SPECIFICALLY TO THE APPLICABLE CRITERIA IN THE COMPREHENSIVE PLAN OR THE DEVELOPMENT CODE. FAILURE TO RAISE AN ISSUE IN PERSON OR BY LETTER AT SOME POINT PRIOR TO THE CLOSE OF THE HEARING ON THE REQUEST, ACCOMPANIED BY STATEMENTS OR EVIDENCE SUFFICIENT TO ALLOW THE HEARINGS AUTHORITY AND ALL PARTIES TO RESPOND PRECLUDES AN APPEAL, AND FAILURE TO SPECIFY THE CRITERION FROM THE COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT CODE OR COMPREHENSIVE PLAN AT WHICH A COMMENT IS DIRECTED PRECLUDES AN APPEAL TO THE LAND USE BOARD OF APPEALS BASED ON THAT ISSUE. ALL DOCUMENTS AND APPLICABLE CRITERIA IN THE ABOVE-NOTED FILE ARE AVAILABLE FOR INSPECTION AT NO COST OR COPIES CAN BE OBTAINED FOR TWENTY-FIVE CENTS (25 ) PER PAGE, OR THE CURRENT RATE CHARGED FOR COPIES AT THE TIME OF THE REQUEST. AT LEAST SEVEN (7) DAYS PRIOR TO THE HEARING, A COPY OF THE STAFF REPORT WILL BE AVAILABLE FOR INSPECTION AT NO COST, OR A COPY CAN BE OBTAINED FOR TWENTY-FIVE CENTS (25 ) PER PAGE, OR THE CURRENT RATE CHARGED FOR COPIES AT THE TIME OF THE REQUEST. FOR FURTHER INFORMATION PLEASE CONTACT THE STAFF PLANNER MORGAN TRACY AT (503) 639-4171, TIGARD CITY HALL, 13125 SW HALL BOULEVARD, TIGARD, OREGON 97223 OR BY E-MAIL AT morgan(a�ci.tigard.or.us. 1 "i i { Ir - - I ` I Y of LIGARD . �- ['Jr- ��-I VICINITY MAP 1 L L� J I_--LJ tf��L_) l__ __)r_1 i _ `� _I I�SDR2002-000 I 1 i \\\\\\\ �'` � I CASH & CARRY \�\ RETAIL STORE T, 1` \ ' < \ gee± r \J \ \ \ \ '\'>-' ' . \ tia.' Vf4' - - -\-\ --r--)11 k- % 1 % 1 I I C47.44.1 1 :V_________ 1 . ILO 200 MO IOC MO•••■ • r---r-- \)1 ________J ,,..... Li, i r � � / T_ .. .:... S136CC-02200 ..101 BB-01201 EXHIBIT ANDREWS MANAGEMENT LTD CO 0 W ! ESALE CORPORATION 11336 SW BULL MOUNTAIN RD ATTN: SE TAX DEPT 111 #104 999 •KE D' TIGARD,OR 97224 V AQUAH,WA 98027 1 136CC-00200 1 S 136CD-00600 AN WS MAN MENT LTD CPD LLC 11336 S L MOUNTAIN RD 10720 SW MOPA AVE #104 PORTLAND,OR 97219 T ARD,OR 972 4 1 S 136CC-00100 1 S 136CA-03700 BARASCH STEPHEN CRAUGHAN MICHAEL J&MARCHETA R BY ARGONAUT HOLDINGS INC 11260 SW 79TH AVE MC 482-CO5-C82 TIGARD,OR 97223 PO BOX 300 DETROIT,MI 48265 1 S 136CD-01800 1 S 136CB-06700 BRETTLER REAL ESTATE INC FILIBERTO DAVILA& BY CAR TOYS PINEDA CLARA L& 20 W GALER ST#300 DAVILA ARMANDO SEATTLE,WA 98121 11287 SW 81ST AVE TIGARD,OR 97223 1 S 136CD-01001 1S136CB-06900 CHEVRON U S A INC FISHEL KAREN M&GREGG C PO BOX 285 11235 SW 81ST AVE HOUSTON,TX 77001 TIGARD,OR 97223 1 S 136CB-09400 1 S 136CA-05400 CHONGWAY FRANK U&CHRISTINE S FISHER JOHN S SR&RENEE M 11242 SW 81ST 10940 SW 95TH TIGARD,OR 97223 TIGARD,OR 97223 1 S 136CD-01002 1 S 136CA-05401 CHRISTENSEN JILL K GALLUCCI NAOMI ALVIA TR 293 SW CERVANTES 11285 SW 78TH AVE LAKE OSWEGO,OR 97035 TIGARD,OR 97223 - 36CD-00401 1S136CA-03500 CHRI ' JILL K GATES MARIE 293 E' •NTES 11300 SW 79TH AVE E OSWEGO,OR 97035 TIGARD,OR 97223 1_ 36CD-00500 1S136CC-02100 CHR N JILL K GRUNBAUM HANS H AND MARILYN K 293 • C VANTES TRUSTEES E OSWE OR 97035 21390 SW EDY RD SHERWOOD,OR 97140 1 S136CD-02200 36CC-02000 COSTCO WHOLESALE CORPORATION GRU AUM NS H AND MARILYN K ATTN:EXCISE TAX DEPT 111 TRUST 999 LAKE DR 213 W E D ISSAQUAH,WA 98027 ERWOOD,OR 97140 i Sa 36CB-07200 1 S 136CD-00102 HADDIX BRYAN S MILLAR TED L TRUSTEE 11220 SW 82ND AVE BY WILLIAM C FLOBERG TIGARD,OR 97223 834 SW ST CLAIR PORTLAND,OR 97205 1 S 136CA-03200 1 S 136CD-01000 KING MARVIN FRANKLIN& MONAGHAN FARMS INC KING TRACEE SUE 14120 EAST EVANS AVE 11255 SW 79TH AVE AURORA,CO 80014 TIGARD,OR 97223 1 S136CA-03600 1 S 136C0-00100 KNIGHT ROBERT W PACIFIC CROSSROADS PROPERTIES I 11290 SW 79TH BY WYSE INVESTMENT SERVICES CO TIGARD,OR 97223 200 SW MARKET ST STE 345 PORTLAND,OR 97201 1 S136CA-01400 1 S136CA-05402 LEE BEN&LAURA LIVING TRUST PEEL WILLIAM 7745 SW PFAFFLE ST 11255 SW 78TH AVE TIGARD,OR 97223 TIGARD,OR 97223 1 S 136CB-09500 1 S 136CB-02800 LEWIS SUSAN M PETERSEN MARGARET ESTATE 11268 SW 81ST AVE 8035 SW PFAFFLE ST TIGARD,OR 97223 TIGARD,OR 97223 1 S 136CA-03301 1 S 136CB-01900 LIPNOS TIMOTHY AND ANITA PFAFFLE HELEN N TR 11305 SW 79TH AVE 8225 SW PFAFFLE TIGARD,OR 97223 TIGARD,OR 97223 1 S136CA-03300 1S136CA-01300 LOOS HELEN A REVOCABLE ROOT GORDON C LIVING TRUST 19935 SW CIPOLE RD BY LOOS HELEN A TR SHERWOOD,OR 97140 7935 SW PFAFFLE TIGARD,OR 97223 1 S 136CA-05300 1 S 136CB-02100 LOWRY THOMAS&KATHLEEN RORMAN JAMES M&SUSAN M 11225 SW 78TH AVE 11250 SW 82ND AVE TIGARD,OR 97223 TIGARD,OR 97223 1 S 136CB-06600 1S 136CB-02000 LOWY GAIL E RUIZ-PRADO CUAUHTEMOC& 11315 SW 81ST AVE GERONIMO-RUIZ ROSAURA TIGARD,OR 97223 8175 SW PFAFFLE ST TIGARD,OR 97223 1 S136CB-06800 1. 36CD-00 .1 MACINTYRE JACOB D TIG 'i ! OF 11263 SW 81ST AVE 131 •LL TIGARD,OR 97223 ARD,O' 97223 I S.136CB-0(5500 WICK MURRAY A 4460 ALHAMBRA STREET SAN DIEGO,CA 92107 1 S 136CA-01200 WILCOX HEATHER M 11280 SW 78TH AVE TIGARD,OR 97223 1 S 136CB-09600 WOO SANG KIL AND OK SON 11300 SW 81ST AVENUE TIGARD,OR 97223 Jack Biethan 11023 SW Summerfield Drive, #4 Tigard, OR 97224 Sue Rorman 11250 SW 82nd Avenue Tigard, OR 97223 Naomi Gallucci 11285 SW 78'h Avenue Tigard, OR 97223 Michael Trigoboff 7072 SW Barbara Lane Tigard, OR 97223 Dieter Jacobs 7775 SW Spruce Street Tigard, OR 97223 Alexander Craghead 12205 SW Hall Boulevard Tigard, OR 97223-6210 David Chapman 9840 SW Landau Place Tigard, OR 97223 Nathan and Ann Murdock PO Box 231265 Tigard, OR 97281 Brad Spring 7555 SW Spruce Street Tigard, OR 97223 ITY OF TIGARD - EAST (IT SUBCOMMITTEE (i:\curpin\setup\labels\CIT East.doc) UPDATED: April 18, 2002 Smart & Final Stores Attn: Fernando Gallarzo SDR2002-00017 600 Citadel Drive CASH & CARRY STORE Los Angeles, CA 90040 Monaghan Farms, Inc. Attn: Tom Deline 14120 East Evans Avenue Aurora, CO 80014 Ed Christensen Welkin Engineering, P.C. 8000 SW Pfaffle Street Portland, OR 97223 Michael C. Robinson Perkins Cole 1211 SW Fifth Avenue, Suite 1500 Portland, OR 97204-3715 AFFIDAVIT OF MAILING CI TY OF TIGARD Community cDeve(opment Shaping Better Community I, Patricia L. Lunsford, being first duly sworn/affirm, on oath depose and say that I am a Senior Administrative Specialist for the City ofTiigard, Washington County, Oregon and that I served the following: (Cheri(APAop,e 80x(5)Bebw) © NOTICE OF DECISION FOR: SDR2002-00017/CASH & CARRY STORES AMENDED NOTICE (Poe No Name Reference) ® City of Tigard Planning Director A copy of the said notice being hereto attached, marked Exhibit"A",and by reference made a part hereof, was mailed to each named person(s) at the address(s) shown on the attached list(s), marked Exhibit"B", and by reference made a part hereof, on January 22,2003, and deposited in the United States Mail on January 22,2003, postage prepaid.411.r „ 674 jdar(Person that "repared Notices STATE OAF O GOW ) County of Washington )ss. City of Tigard ) 6 i Subscribed and sworn/affirmed before me on the day of I' 'i , 2003. • OFFICIAL SEAL F.e 7) DIANE M JELDERKS ' NOTARY PUBLIC-OREGON COMMISS ON NO.32 MY COMMISSION EXPIRES SEP7T.07,2003 I I. ' I I I ;i""►`t My Commission 1T es: � • EXHI- IT 14 NOTICE OF TYPE II DECISION SITE DEVELOPMENT REVIEW (SDR) 2002-00017 CITY OF TIGARD Community Development CASH AND CARRY STORES sprngABetterCommunity 120 DAYS = 4/15/2003 SECTION I. APPLICATION SUMMARY FILE NAME: CASH AND CARRY STORES CASE NO.: Site Development Review (SDR) SDR2002-00017 PROPOSAL: The applicant is requesting Site Development Review approval to convert an existing 32,380 square foot building from a furniture store (bulk sales use) to a discount grocery store (retail sales use) and future retail tenant space. Apart from re-striping the parking lot and minor façade changes, no other alterations are proposed. OWNER: Monaghan Farms Attn: Tom Deline 14120 E. Evans Avenue Aurora, CO 80014 APPLICANT: Smart and Final Attn: Fernando Gallarzo 600 Citadel Drive Los Angeles, CA 90040 LOCATION: 11745 SW Pacific Highway; WCTM 1 S136CD, Tax Lot 1000. ZONE: C-G: General Commercial District. The C-G zoning district is designed to accommodate a full range of retail, office and civic uses with a City-wide and even regional trade area. Except where non-conforming, residential uses are limited to single-family residences which are located on the same site as a permitted use. APPLICABLE REVIEW Community Development Code Chapters 18.360, 18.390, 18.520, 18.705, CRITERIA: 18.725, 18.745, 18.755, 18.765, 18.780, 18.795 and 18.810. SECTION II . DECISION Notice is hereby given that the City of Tigard Community Development Director's designee has APPROVED the above Site Development Review request subject to certain conditions of approval. The findings and conclusions on which the decision is based are noted in the full decision, available at City Hall. THIS APPROVAL SHALL BE VALID FOR 18 MONTHS FROM THE EFFECTIVE DATE OF THIS DECISION. All documents and applicable criteria in the above-noted file are available for inspection at no cost or copies can be obtained for twenty-five cents (25 ) per page, or the current rate charged for copies at the time of the request. SECTION III. PROCEDURE AND APPEAL INFORMATION Notice: Notice mailed to: X The applicant and owners X Owner of record within the required distance X Affected government agencies Final Decision: THIS DECISION IS FINAL ON JANUARY 22, 2003 AND BECOMES EFFECTIVE ON FEBRUARY 6, 2003 UNLESS AN APPEAL IS FILED. A_p e�al: The Director's Decision is final on the date that it is mailed. All persons entitled to notice or who are otherwise adversely affected or aggrieved by the decision as provided in Section 18.390.040.G.1 may appeal this decision in accordance with Section 18.390.040.G.2 of the Tigard Community Development Code which provides that a written appeal together with the required fee shall be filed with the Director within ten (10) business days of the date the Notice of Decision was mailed. The appeal fee schedule and forms are available from the Planning Division of Tigard City Hall, 13125 SW Hall Boulevard, Tigard, Oregon 97223. Unless the applicant is the appellant, the hearing on an appeal from the Director's Decision shall be confined to the specific issues identified in the written comments submitted by the parties during the comment period. Additional evidence concerning issues properly raised in the Notice of Appeal may be submitted by any party during the appeal hearing, subject to any additional rules of procedure that may be adopted from time to time by the appellate body. THE DEADLINE FOR FILING AN APPEAL IS 5:00 PM ON JANUARY 5, 2003. I Questions: For further information please contact the Planning Division Staff Planner, Morgan Tracy at (503) 639-4171, Tigard City Hall, 13125 SW Hall Boulevard, Tigard, Oregon 97223. -- -_ _- CITY of TIGARD 6 _gr� ai .. p_. I VICINITY MAP al am, - .Kw ills as el id ' 1 SDR2002-00011 \\ ,-5 �'°. CASH & CARRY 4 \ --_ RETAIL STORE U \-1 / ( , / ,.. \\ L_______F- 4\ N.,ftiv :- _.i\, -° i \ \\____j A I 1 1.6.4,, 7-7----7-r-* ii ,..=,:z,.. . r \ .. _— .... I t •I • ew a \___\ II 1.1 .I Z i w.^ .. O 1 0 f CASH ANO CARRY --` 5 s-----\��t 1,: ye ° o } = 1 1 - �I 1,V---r- s �' 4 r 0�/ �/ CN TER Nwa i` ':!/,N... ... ^°^ a .. , .. •.0".. J PARKING AREA E y�T� Vic,,�� @ x "y• p` ., d e--...-- ,- - 4 - E..-:.. Setip7,,--<- 4": \ `yT`'' - Il o / 9�1� U �9 P anOF TIGARD t SDR2002-00017 SITE B.LAN CASH&CARRY RETAIL STORE (Map is not to scale) w 4 EXHIBIT -f3Ts6cC-o22oo t of ss-o12o1 ---.._� ANDREWS MANAGEMENT LTD CO 0 W ESALE CORPORATION 11336 SW BULL MOUNTAIN RD ATTN: SE TAX DEPT 111 #104 999 KE D TIGARD,OR 97224 I AQUAH,WA 98027 1 136CC-00200 1 S 136CD-00600 AN WS MAN MENT LTD CPD LLC 11336 S L MOUNTAIN RD 10720 SW MOPA AVE #104 PORTLAND,OR 97219 T ARD,OR 972 4 1 S 136CC-00100 is 136CA-03700 BARASCH STEPHEN CRAUGHAN MICHAEL J&MARCHETA R BY ARGONAUT HOLDINGS INC 11260 SW 79TH AVE MC 482-C05-C82 TIGARD,OR 97223 PO BOX 300 DETROIT,MI 48265 1 S 136CD-01800 1 S 136CB-06700 BRETTLER REAL ESTATE INC FILIBERTO DAVILA& BY CAR TOYS PINEDA CLARA L& 20 W GALER ST#300 DAVILA ARMANDO SEATTLE,WA 98121 11287 SW 81ST AVE TIGARD,OR 97223 1 S136CD-01001 1 S136CB-06900 CHEVRON U S A INC FISHEL KAREN M&GREGG C PO BOX 285 11235 SW 81ST AVE HOUSTON,TX 77001 TIGARD,OR 97223 1 S136CB-09400 1 S136CA-05400 CHONGWAY FRANK U&CHRISTINE S FISHER JOHN S SR&RENEE M 11242 SW 81ST 10940 SW 95TH TIGARD,OR 97223 TIGARD,OR 97223 1 S 136CD-01002 1 S 136CA-05401 CHRISTENSEN JILL K GALLUCCI NAOMI ALVIA TR 293 SW CERVANTES 11285 SW 78TH AVE LAKE OSWEGO,OR 97035 TIGARD,OR 97223 . 36CD-00401 1S 136CA-03500 CHRI ' JILL K GATES MARIE 293 E' •NTES 11300 SW 79TH AVE E OSWEGO,OR 97035 TIGARD,OR 97223 1 36C0-00500 1 S136CC-02100 CHR N JILL K GRUNBAUM HANS H AND MARILYN K 293 C VANTES TRUSTEES E OSWE OR 97035 21390 SW EDY RD SHERWOOD,OR 97140 1 S 136CD-02200 36CC-02000 COSTCO WHOLESALE CORPORATION GRU AUM NS H AND MARILYN K ATTN:EXCISE TAX DEPT 111 TRUST 999 LAKE DR 213 W E D ISSAQUAH,WA 98027 ERWOOD,OR 97140 4 9 S 13608-02200 1 S 136CD-00102 HADDIX BRYAN S MILLAR TED L TRUSTEE 11220 SW 82ND AVE BY WILLIAM C FLOBERG TIGARD,OR 97223 834 SW ST CLAIR PORTLAND,OR 97205 1S 136CA-03200 1 S 136CD-01000 KING MARVIN FRANKLIN& MONAGHAN FARMS INC KING TRACEE SUE 14120 EAST EVANS AVE 11255 SW 79TH AVE AURORA,CO 80014 TIGARD,OR 97223 1 S 136CA-03600 1S13600-00100 KNIGHT ROBERT W PACIFIC CROSSROADS PROPERTIES I 11290 SW 79TH BY WYSE INVESTMENT SERVICES CO TIGARD,OR 97223 200 SW MARKET ST STE 345 PORTLAND,OR 97201 1 S 136CA-01400 1 S 136CA-05402 LEE BEN&LAURA LIVING TRUST PEEL WILLIAM 7745 SW PFAFFLE ST 11255 SW 78TH AVE TIGARD,OR 97223 TIGARD,OR 97223 1 S13608-09500 1S136CB-02800 LEWIS SUSAN M PETERSEN MARGARET ESTATE 11268 SW 81ST AVE 8035 SW PFAFFLE ST TIGARD,OR 97223 TIGARD,OR 97223 1 S 136CA-03301 15136CB-01900 LIPNOS TIMOTHY AND ANITA PFAFFLE HELEN N TR 11305 SW 79TH AVE 8225 SW PFAFFLE TIGARD,OR 97223 TIGARD,OR 97223 15136CA-03300 15136CA-01300 LOOS HELEN A REVOCABLE ROOT GORDON C LIVING TRUST 19935 SW CIPOLE RD BY LOOS HELEN A TR SHERWOOD,OR 97140 7935 SW PFAFFLE TIGARD,OR 97223 1 S 136CA-05300 1 S 136CB-02100 LOWRY THOMAS&KATHLEEN RORMAN JAMES M&SUSAN M 11225 SW 78TH AVE 11250 SW 82ND AVE TIGARD,OR 97223 TIGARD,OR 97223 1 S 136CB-06600 1S 136CB-02000 LOWY GAIL E RUIZ-PRADO CUAUHTEMOC& 11315 SW 81ST AVE GERONIMO-RUIZ ROSAURA TIGARD,OR 97223 8175 SW PFAFFLE ST TIGARD,OR 97223 1S 136CB-06800 1 36CD-00 1 MACINTYRE JACOB D TIG Y OF 11263 SW 81ST AVE 131 ALL TIGARD,OR 97223 T ARD,0 97223 S136CB-06500 WICK MURRAY A 4460 ALHAMBRA STREET SAN DIEGO,CA 92107 151 36CA-01200 WILCOX HEATHER M 11280 SW 78TH AVE TIGARD,OR 97223 1 S 136CB-09600 WOO SANG KIL AND OK SON 11300 SW 81ST AVENUE TIGARD,OR 97223 Jack Biethan 11023 SW Summerfield Drive, #4 Tigard, OR 97224 Sue Rorman 11250 SW 82nd Avenue Tigard, OR 97223 Naomi Gallucci 11285 SW 78th Avenue Tigard, OR 97223 Michael Trigoboff 7072 SW Barbara Lane Tigard, OR 97223 Dieter Jacobs 7775 SW Spruce Street Tigard, OR 97223 Alexander Crag head 12205 SW Hall Boulevard Tigard, OR 97223-6210 David Chapman 9840 SW Landau Place Tigard, OR 97223 Nathan and Ann Murdock PO Box 231265 Tigard, OR 97281 Brad Spring 7555 SW Spruce Street Tigard, OR 97223 ITY OF TIGARD - EAST CIT SUBCOMMITTEE (i:\curpin\setup\labels\CIT East.doc) UPDATED: April 18, 2002 .„A■ AFFIDAVIT OF MAILING CITY OFTIGARD Community(Development ShapingA(Better Community I, cPatricia L. Luns{ord, being first duly sworn/affirm, on oath depose and say that I am a Senior Administrative Specialist for the City of'Tigard; Washington County, Oregon and that I served the following: (Check Appropriate Box(s)Below) E3 NOTICE OF DECISION FOR: SDR2002-00017/(ASH & CARRY STORES ❑ AMENDED NOTICE (File No/Name Reference) ® City of Tigard Planning Director A copy of the said notice being hereto attached, marked Exhibit"A", and by reference made a part hereof, was mailed to each named person(s) at the address(s) shown on the attached list(s), marked Exhibit"B",and by reference made a part hereof, on January 22,2003, and deposited in the United States Mail on January 22,2003, postage prepaid. Aieyei . . c,/ izt (Person at P -pared otice) ' STAR, OE OXEGOTI ) County of Washington )ss. City of Tigard ) A '4i - Subscribed and sworn/affirmed before me on the day ofi‘Y`Gt , 2003. 0. OFFICIAL SEAL DIANE M JELDERKS .�, NOTARYP '" UBLIC OR l / MY COMM�S OIN ION N0.326G578 ' 1 l ' ' I , 1 I '' � 1 ' EXPIRE SEPT.07 2003 My Commission 3 p" . : 777 �__.? EXHIBIT A NOTICE OF TYPE II DECISION SITE DEVELOPMENT REVIEW (SDR) 2002-00017 'x'° CITY OF TIdARD CASH AND CARRY STORES Community Shaping A Better Community 120 DAYS = 4/15/2003 SECTION I. APPLICATION SUMMARY FILE NAME: CASH AND CARRY STORES CASE NO.: Site Development Review (SDR) SDR2002-00017 PROPOSAL: The applicant is requesting Site Development Review approval to convert an existing 32,380 square foot building from a furniture store (bulk sales use) to a discount grocery store (retail sales use) and future retail tenant space. Apart from re-striping the parking lot and minor façade changes, no other alterations are proposed. OWNER: Monaghan Farms Attn: Tom Deline 14120 E. Evans Avenue Aurora, CO 80014 APPLICANT: Smart and Final Attn: Fernando Gallarzo 600 Citadel Drive Los Angeles, CA 90040 LOCATION: 11745 SW Pacific Highway; WCTM 1 S136CD, Tax Lot 1000. ZONE: C-G: General Commercial District. The C-G zoning district is designed to accommodate a full range of retail, office and civic uses with a City-wide and even regional trade area. Except where non-conforming, residential uses are limited to single-family residences which are located on the same site as a permitted use. APPLICABLE REVIEW Community Development Code Chapters 18.360, 18.390, 18.520, CRITERIA: 18.705, 18.725, 18.745, 18.755, 18.765, 18.780, 18.795 and 18.810. SECTION II. DECISION Notice is hereby given that the City of Tigard Community Development Director's designee has APPROVED the above request subject to certain conditions of approval. The findings and conclusions on which the decision is based are noted in Section VI. NOTICE OF TYPE II DECISION SDR2002-00017/CASH AND CARRY STORES PAGE 1 OF 19 CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL THE FOLLOWING CONDITIONS SHALL BE SATISFIED PRIOR TO ISSUANCE OF A CERTIFICATE OF OCCUPANCY: Submit evidence of complying with the following conditions to the Planning Division. Staff contact: Morgan Tracy at 503-639-4171, ext. 2428. 1 . The applicant/owner shall record a pedestrian access easement for a future pedestrian/bicycle connection to the abutting C-P zoned property to the north (presently described as WCTM 1S136CD, tax lots 401 , 500, 1002). The easement shall be located in an area where a feasible connection can be made, considering topography, structures, and existing significant vegetation. This walkway need not be constructed, however, the easement must authorize the abutting property to construct the connecting walkway at the time Site Development Review occurs for that property. The owner shall retain the right to close this access; however, it shall remain open while business is being conducted on the subject parcel during normal business hours. 2. The applicant shall demonstrate that existing lighting is sufficient to illuminate a person along the pedestrian route connection to abutting properties, or shall install additional lighting to satisfy TDC 18.360.090(A)(10). 3. The applicant/owner shall acknowledge, in writing, their acceptance of this condition which requires that if ODOT approves a vehicular connection between the subject property and the property to the north, the two properties shall provide reciprocal easements and construct a vehicular connection when the property to the north develops. 4. Provide 10 bicycle parking stalls that meet the design requirements of Section 18.765.050(C) of the Tigard Development Code. Submit to the Engineering Department (Brian Rager, 639-4171, ext. 2471) for review and approval: 5. The applicant shall submit a suite layout map to the Engineering Department. If the applicant is not sure how many suites will be used, they must estimate a number. The City will then assign suite numbers and the address fee will then be calculated. The fee must be paid by the applicant prior to issuance of the building permit. (STAFF CONTACT: Shirley Treat, Engineering). THIS APPROVAL SHALL BE VALID FOR EIGHTEEN (18) MONTHS FROM THE EFFECTIVE DATE OF THIS DECISION. SECTION III. BACKGROUND INFORMATION Site History: The subject property received Site Development Review approval for development of the Sear's Home Life Furniture Store on May 13, 1994 (SDR94-00006). The approval included the existing 32,380 square foot building, parking, landscaping and other site improvements. In 2001 the bulk sales tenant moved out of the building. Vicinity Information: The subject site is located on the north side of SW Pacific Highway, east of Highway 217 and is located behind the Chevron Gas Station. Site Information and Proposal Description: In August of 2002, Smart and Final applied for a minor modification to re-stripe the parking lot to provide the increased parking required for a retail sales use. During the review of that minor modification request, it was found that the trip generation would exceed an increase of 100 vehicle trips per day. As such, the minor modification could not be approved, and the site would require a major modification review. The applicant completed their Major Modification application submittal on December 6, 2002. This decision reflects that revised application. NOTICE OF TYPE II DECISION SDR2002-00017/CASH AND CARRY STORES PAGE 2 OF 19 The applicant is requesting Site Development Review approval to convert an existing 32,380 square foot building from a furniture store (bulk sales use) to a discount grocery store (retail sales use) and future retail tenant space. Apart from re-striping the parking lot and minor façade changes, no other alterations are proposed. SECTION IV. COMMENTS FROM PROPERTY OWNERS WITHIN 500 FEET Staff received one phone call from a nearby owner, inquiring about the nature of the business, but had no specific concerns. One letter was received from Mr. Ed Christensen, of Welkin Engineering, P.C., regarding the level of information provided in the applicant's application, the lack of a joint access, and off site traffic improvement needs. With regard to the level of detail provided in the applicant's application, staff agrees that the level of detail provided is not exhaustive. However, in consideration of the proposed development and the lack of physical changes that were being proposed, staff is comfortable utilizing the majority of findings from the original approval in 1994. The applicant has addressed in a cursory form, the required sections of the development code, and has offered a trip generation study to determine the level of impact with regard to the transportation system. The joint access issue is discussed in greater detail under Section 18.705, Access. With regard to off site traffic improvements, Mr. Christensen notes "Because of the increased additional traffic resulting from this change in use, the intersection at Dartmouth/78 and Highway 99 shoMild be reviewed for additional widening...Improvements could include widening the 78 Avenue leg between Pfaffle and Highway 99, and re-striping the intersection." Staff notes that the project will result in an estimated additional 451 average daily trips; however, the impacts specific to the Dartmouth and Pacific Highway intersection are not anticipated to be significant based on the existing street network. The majority of the congestion at this intersection can be attributed to traffic from SW Hall Boulevard moving east along Pfaffle utilizing the left turn signal to travel north on Pacific Highway. It is very unlikely that vehicles will leave the Cash and Carry site heading south, turn north onto Hall Boulevard, turn again on Pfaffle to make a left turn onto Pacific Highway to head north, since the existing driveway already allows left turns onto Pacific Highway which has a refuge lane. Moreover, should a vehicular connection be established linking Pacific Highway with SW PfaffIQ, the additional traffic would compound the traffic situation at either the Hall and Pfaffle or 78 and Pacific Highway intersections. The primary access to the subject site is from a separate driveway onto Pacific Highway that allows for the full range of turning movements. In addition, ODOT controls the intersection referenced by Welkin and did not recommend further analysis. Therefore, Staff maintains that the impact area for this development has been adequately addressed by all affected agencies, and no further analysis is necessary. Further, to impose a condition requiring an off site exaction, Nolan v. California Coastal Commission established that there be a nexus, or link, between the exaction required and the impact generated from the development. Since it has not been established that this project will contribute to an adverse impact on the Dartmouth/78th and Pacific Highway intersection, this off site improvement cannot be justified. SECTION V. SUMMARY OF APPLICABLE REVIEW CRITERIA A. Zoning Districts 18.520 (Commercial Zoning Districts) B. Applicable Development Code Standards 18.705 Access Egress and Circulation) 18.725 Environmental Performance Standards) 18.745 Landscaping and Screening) 18.755 Mixed Solid Waste and Recyclable Storage) 18.765 Off-Street parking and loading requirements) 18.780 Signs) 18.795 Visual Clearance) NOTICE OF TYPE II DECISION SDR2002-00017/CASH AND CARRY STORES PAGE 3 OF 19 C. Specific SDR Approval Criteria 18.360 D. Street and Utility Improvement Standards 18.810 E. Impact Study 18.390 SECTION VI. APPLICABLE DEVELOPMENT CODE STANDARDS A. ZONIING DISTRICT Commercial Zoning District: Section 18.520.020 Lists the description of the Commercial Zoning Districts. The site is located in the C-G: General Commercial District. Development Standards: Section 18.520.040.B States that Development standards in commercial zoning districts are contained in Table 18.520.2 below: TABLE 18.520.2 DEVELOPMENT STANDARDS IN COMMERCIAL ZONES STANDARD C-G Proposed Minimum Lot Size None 113,256 sq. ft. - Detached unit - - Boarding, lodging, rooming house - Minimum Lot Width 50 ft 150 ft. Minimum Setbacks - Front yard 0 ft 80 ft. - Side facing street on corner & through lots - - - Side yard 0/20 ft. * 15'ft west/ 50 ft. east -- Rear yard 0/20 ft * 20 ft. - Distance between front of garage & property line. - - Maximurn Height 45 ft. 27 ft. Maximum Site Coverage [2] 85% 80% Minimum Landscape Requirement 15% 20% * no setback shall be required except where the property abuts a residential zone, in which case, a minimum 20 foot setback applies As demonstrated in the table above, the applicant's plans comply with the dimensional standards of the C-G zone. FINDING: Based on the analysis above, the Development Standards criteria have been satisfied. B. APPLICABLE DEVELOPMENT CODE STANDARDS The Site development Review approval standards require that a development proposal be found to be consistent with the various standards of the Community Development Code. The applicable criteria in this case are Chapters 18.360, 18.390, 18.520, 18.705, 18.745, 18.755, 18.765, 18.775, 18.780, 18.790, 18.795, and 18.810. The proposal's consistency with these Code Chapters is reviewed in the following sections. NOTICE OF TYPE II DECISION SDR2002-00017/CASH AND CARRY STORES PAGE 4 OF 19 Access, Egress and Circulation (18.705): Access plan: No building or other permit shall be issued until scaled plans are presented and approved as provided by this chapter that show how access, egress and circulation requirements are to be fulfilled. The applicant shall submit a site plan. The Director shall provide the applicant with detailed information about this submission requirement. No change to the existing access is proposed. Currently the site is accessed by a single driveway connecting to SW Pacific Highway. Joint access: Owners of two or more uses, structures, or parcels of land may agree to utilize jointly the same access and egress when the combined access and egress of both uses, structures, or parcels of land satisfies the combined requirements as designated in this title, provided: Satisfactory legal evidence shall be presented in the form of deeds, easements, leases or contracts to establish the joint use; and copies of the deeds, easements, leases or contracts are placed on permanent file with the City. Access is pre-existing and already is jointly shared with the small retail center to the east. In addition, a crossover easement has been recorded as part of a prior approval to allow access to the as station to the west. This easement will be utilized once the gas station is substantially modified. Section 18.705.030.H.1 states that an access report shall be submitted with all new development proposals which verifies design of driveways and streets are safe by meeting adequate stacking needs, sight distance and deceleration standards as set by ODOT, Washington County, the City and AASHTO. There is an existing full service driveway onto 99W for this site that has already been previously approved by ODOT. Pacific Highway (99W) is an ODOT facility and access reservations are controlled by ODOT. ODOT has reviewed this application and did not have concern with the continued use of the existing driveway. Section 18.705.030.H.2 states that driveways shall not be permitted to be placed in the influence area of collector or arterial street intersections. Influence area of intersections is that area where queues of traffic commonly form on approach to an intersection. The minimum driveway setback from a collector or arterial street intersection shall be150 feet, measured from the right-of-way line of the intersecting street to the throat of the proposed driveway. The setback may be greater depending upon the influence area, as determined from City Engineer review of a traffic impact report submitted by the applicant's traffic engineer. In a case where a project has less than 150 feet of street frontage, the applicant must explore any option for shared access with the adjacent parcel. If shared access is not possible or practical, the driveway shall be placed as far from the intersection as possible. The existing access onto 99W is approximately 600 feet from the intersection at Dartmouth/78th/99W, 425 feet from the Highway 217 off ramps, and approximately 175 feet from the beginning of the northbound Highway 217 onramp. Therefore, the existing access meets this criterion. Section 18.705.030.H.3 and 4 states that the minimum spacing of driveways and streets along a collector shall be 200 feet. The minimum spacing of driveways and streets along an arterial shall be 600 feet. The minimum spacing of local streets along a local street shall be 125 feet. The existing access onto 99W was previously approved by ODOT and continues to be acceptable to them for this use. NOTICE OF TYPE II DECISION SDR2002-00017/CASH AND CARRY STORES PAGE 5 OF 19 Public street access: All vehicular access and egress as required in Sections 18.705.030H and 18.705.0301 shall connect directly with a public or private street approved by the City for public use and shall be maintained at the required standards on a continuous basis. The proposed building is accessible from SW Pacific Highway which is a public street that will be maintained as a public street. Curb cuts: Curb cuts shall be in accordance with Section 18.810.030N: Concrete curbs, curb cuts, wheelchair, bicycle ramps and driveway approaches shall be constructed in accordance with standards specified in this chapter and Section 15.04.080: Concrete curbs and driveway approaches are required; except where no sidewalk is planned, an asphalt approach may be constructed with City Engineer approval and Asphalt and concrete driveway approaches to the property line shall be built to City configuration standards. No driveway approach shall be less than five feet from the side property line projected except in cul-de-sacs, without approval and written permission of the city. The end slopes may encroach within the five foot restricted area. No portion of any driveway approach, including the end slopes, shall be located closer than thirty feet to an intersection street right-of-way line. Commercial or service drives shall not be more than thirty feet in width and if located on the same lot frontage shall be separated by a minimum length of curb of thirty feet. Each residential driveway shall be not more than twenty-six feet in width including end slopes, and if more than one driveway is to be constructed to serve the same lot, the frontage spacing between such driveways shall be not less than thirty feet measured along the curb line. Joint access driveways shall conform to the appropriate width standard for commercial or residential type usage. The driveway approach is pre-existing. Therefore, this standard does not apply. Walkways: On-site pedestrian walkways shall comply with the following standards: Walkways shall extend from the ground floor entrances or from the ground floor landing of stairs, ramps, or elevators of all commercial, institutional, and industrial uses, to the streets which provide the required access and egress. Walkways shall provide convenient connections between buildings in multi-building commercial, institutional, and industrial complexes. Unless impractical, walkways shall be constructed between new and existing developments and neighboring developments; Existing on-site pedestrian walkways connect the building to SW Pacific Highway. Wherever required walkways cross vehicle access driveways or parking lots, such crossings shall be designed and located for pedestrian safety . Required walkways shall be physically separated from motor vehicle traffic and parking by either a minimum 6-inch vertical separation (curbed) or a minimum 3-foot horizontal separation, except that pedestrian crossings of traffic aisles are permitted for distances no greater than 36 feet if appropriate landscaping, pavement markings, or contrasting pavement materials are used. Walkways shall be a minimum of four feet in width, exclusive of vehicle overhangs and obstructions such as mailboxes, benches, bicycle racks, and sign posts, and shall be in compliance with ADA standards; The existing walkway connection crosses the access aisles twice. Both crossings are less than 36 feet in length, and are striped to designate their location to drivers and pedestrians. Required walkways shall be paved with hard surfaced materials such as concrete, asphalt, stone, brick, etc. Walkways may be required to be lighted and/or signed as needed for safety purposes. Soft-surfaced public use pathways may be provided only if such pathways are provided in addition to required pathways. NOTICE OF TYPE II DECISION SDR2002-00017/CASH AND CARRY STORES PAGE 6 OF 19 The existing walkway is concrete with the exception of the parking areas which are hard surfaced asphalt. This standard is met. Minimum Access Requirements for Commercial and Industrial Use: Section 18.705.030.1_provides the minimum access requirements for commercial and industrial uses: Table 18.705.3 indicates that the required access width for developments with 0-99 parking spaces is one 30-foot accesses with 24 feet of pavement. Vehicular access shall be provided to commercial or industrial uses, and shall be located to within 50 feet of the primary ground floor entrances; additional requirements for truck traffic may be placed as conditions of site development review. Access to the site is pre-existing and satisfies this standard. One-way vehicular access points: Where a proposed parking facility indicates only one-way traffic flow on the site, it shall be accommodated by a specific driveway serving the facility; the entrance drive shall be situated closest to oncoming traffic and the exit drive shall be situated farthest from oncoming traffic. The access drive is designed for two-way traffic. Therefore, this standard does not apply. The Director has the authority to restrict access when the need to do so is dictated by one or more of the following conditions: To provide for increased traffic movement on congested streets and to eliminate turning movement problems, the Director may restrict the location of driveways on streets and require the location of driveways be placed on adjacent streets, upon the finding that the proposed access would: • Cause or increase existing hazardous traffic conditions; or • Provide inadequate access for emergency vehicles; or • Cause hazardous conditions to exist which would constitute a clear and present danger to the public health, safety, and general welfare. To eliminate the need to use public streets for movements between commercial or industrial properties, parking areas shall be designed to connect with parking areas on adjacent properties unless not feasible. The Director shall require access easements between properties where necessary to provide for parking area connections; To facilitate pedestrian and bicycle traffic, access and parking area plans shall provide efficient sidewalk and/or pathway connections, as feasible, between neighboring developments or land uses; The access to the subject property is pre-existing and is not considered hazardous or as constituting a clear and present danger to the public health. Therefore, no access restriction is required. The parking area has already been designed to connect with abutting properties on SW Pacific Highway to reduce the need for additional driveway locations, and reduce the need for public street use between these developments. Mr. Ed Christensen, representing Welkin Engineering as an attendee of the applicant's neighborhood meeting, raised the prospect of providing a connection to the property to the north (fronting SW Pfaffle). However; as Pacific Highway is an ODOT road facility and is already overburdened with traffic, introducing additional traffic from SW Pfaffle could detrimentally impact the function of the existing access drive. Also, such a connection would provide an opportunity for cut through traffic from the arterial to the collector street, which is prohibited by TMC 10.32.245 "Crossing private Property. No operator of a vehicle shall proceed from one street to another street by crossing private property. This provision shall not apply to the operator of a vehicle who stops on the property for the purpose of procuring or providing goods or services." Connection of parking areas normally serves parking lots along the same street. Connections that serve two different streets can be detrimental to the capacity of these streets as in this case. This code section provides for connection between commercial properties to keep vehicles off public streets, not to encourage use of other NOTICE OF TYPE II DECISION SDR2002-00017/CASH AND CARRY STORES PAGE 7 OF 19 streets and through movements. Staff finds that such a connection, as requested, could detrimentally affect existing traffic patterns and adversely affect both the existing driveway and Pacific Highway. Welkin cited 18.705 and stated that the 451 additional daily trips from this development will cause the eastbound lane of Pfaff le Street at 78 Avenue to back up even more than it does now at peak times. Welkin states that the City should require the applicant to provide a parking lot access connection between the subject site and the properties to the north that were approved by SDR 1999-00024 (Welkin) and SDR 2001-00010 (Cameron Plaza). Since primary access to the subject site is from the driveway on Pacific Highway, Staff is not convinced that the traffic on Pfaffle Street will experience significant growth as a result of this change of use. ODOT has reviewed this application and found that the proposed use is consistent with the previous use and the surrounding uses. Staff also spoke directly with ODOT staff to get their views on a parking lot connection, as there would be more traffic entering Pacific Highway through the site driveway. ODOT stated that the existing driveway onto Pacific Highway already serves two parcels that generate substantial traffic (the subject site and the adjacent Crossroads Shopping Center) and an easement is already in place to serve the abutting Chevron Station upon substantial future modification of that site. ODOT is not in favor of increasing the use of that driveway to serve two additional parcels. Therefore, Staff recommends against a parking lot connection to the north. However, staff does not wish to preclude the possibility for a vehicular connection, should the issues related to cut through traffic, and impacts to the ODOT facility be resolved. If the applicant can receive authorization for a connection to the property(ies) on Pfaffle from ODOT, and present a design that will prevent cut through traffic to the satisfaction of the Planning Director, then staff would support this vehicle connection. This standard also speaks to the necessity for pedestrian and bicycle access between neighboring properties. Whereas a vehicular connection to additional properties on Pfaflle would have adverse impacts to the road facility and operation of the driveway, a pedestrian connection is not only feasible, but is warranted. There may be a security concern with a pedestrian connection as it would lead people to the side of and behind the existing building, where there are no windows for monitoring purposes. Therefore, the applicant may be allowed to close the connection after business hours. Also, the applicant will be required to install adequate lighting for security purposes along the pedestrian route. FINDING: Based on the analysis above, the Access, Egress and Circulation standards have not been met. CONDITION:The applicant/owner shall record a pedestrian access easement for a future pedestrian/bicycle connection to any one of the abutting C-P zoned properties. The easement shall be located in an area where a feasible connection can be made, considering topography, structures, and existing significant vegetation. This walkway need not be constructed, however, the easement must authorize the abutting property to construct the connecting walkway at the time Site Development Review occurs for that property. The owner shall retain the right to close this access; however, it shall remain open while business is being conducted on the subject parcel during normal business hours. Landscaping and Screening (18.745): Street Trees: Section 18.745.040 states that all development projects fronting on a public street or a private drive more than 100 feet in length shall be required to plant street trees in accordance with Section 18.745.040.0 Section 18.745.040.0 requires that street trees be spaced between 20 and 40 feet apart depending on the size classification of the tree at maturity (small, medium or large). Street trees are pre-existing along SW Pacific Highway. Therefore, this standard is met. NOTICE OF TYPE II DECISION SDR2002-00017/CASH AND CARRY STORES PAGE 8 OF 19 Buffering and Screening: Section 18.745.080 states that no buffer is required between abutting uses that are of a different type when the uses are separated by a street. No buffer is required between a proposed office use and existing office use. The subject site for the proposed development is adjacent to a C-P (Professional Commercial) zone. There is an existing non-conforming single family residence located to the northeast of the subject site. Existing buffering and screening material is already present along this shared property line. No other additional landscaping buffer is required. This standard is met. Screening: Special Provisions: Section 18.745.050.E requires the screening of parking and loading areas. Landscaped parking areas shall include special design features which effectively screen the parking lot areas from view. Planting materials to be installed should achieve a relative balance between low lying and vertical shrubbery and trees. Trees shall be planted in landscaped islands in all parking areas, and shall be equally distributed on the basis of one (1) tree for each seven (7) parking spaces in order to provide a canopy effect. The minimum dimension on the landscape islands shall be three (3) feet wide and the landscaping shall be protected from vehicular damage by some form of wheel guard or curb. Due to the configuration of the parking lot, only four parking spaces are visible from SW Pacific Highway. These have been screened by a combination of low lying shrubs and small trees. Parking lot trees have been planted per the prior land use approval and are in conformance with this standard. Screening Of Service Facilities: Except for one-family and two-family dwellings, any refuse container or disposal area and service facilities such as gas meters and air conditioners which would otherwise be visible from a public street, customer or resident parking area, any public facility or any residential area shall be screened from view by placement of a solid wood fence or masonry wall between five and eight feet in height. All refuse materials shall be contained within the screened area; Screening of Service Facilities is addressed under Chapter 18.755 (Mixed Solid Waste and Recyclable Storage). FINDING: Based on the analysis above, the landscaping and screening standards have been met. Mixed Solid Waste and Recyclables Storage (18.755): Chapter 18.755 requires that new construction incorporates functional and adequate space for on-site storage and efficient collection of mixed solid waste and source separated Recyclables prior to pick-up and removal by haulers. The applicant must choose one (1) of the following four (4) methods to demonstrate compliance: Minimum Standard, Waste Assessment, Comprehensive Recycling Plan, or Franchised Hauler Review and Sign-Off. The applicant will have to submit evidence or a plan which indicates compliance with this section. Regardless of which method chosen, the applicant will have to submit a written sign-off from the franchise hauler regarding the facility location and compatibility. The applicant's plans show the existing 200 square foot enclosure for trash and recycle dumpsters. Since no changes are being proposed to this enclosure and the property has received trash hauler service, this standard is met. Location Standards: To encourage its use, the storage area for source-separated recyclable shall be co- located with the storage area for residual mixed solid waste; Indoor and outdoor storage areas shall comply with Uniform Building and Fire Code requirements; Storage area space requirements can be satisfied with a single location or multiple locations, and can combine both interior and exterior locations; Exterior storage areas can be located within NOTICE OF TYPE II DECISION SDR2002-00017/CASH AND CARRY STORES PAGE 9 OF 19 interior side yard or rear yard areas. Exterior storage areas shall not be located within a required front yard setback or in a yard adjacent to a public or private street; Exterior storage areas shall be located in central and visible locations on a site to enhance security for users; Exterior storage areas can be located in a parking area, if the proposed use provides at least the minimum number of parking spaces required for the use after deducting the area used for storage. Storage areas shall be appropriately screened according to the provisions in 18.755.050 C, design standards; The storage area shall be accessible for collection vehicles and located so that the storage area will not obstruct pedestrian or vehicle traffic movement on the site or on public streets adjacent to the site. The refuse container facility on the proposed site is pre-existing and meets this standard. Design Standards: The dimensions of the storage area shall accommodate containers consistent with current methods of local collection; Storage containers shall meet Uniform Fire Code standards and be made and covered with waterproof materials or situated in a covered area; Exterior storage areas shall be enclosed by a sight-obscuring fence wall, or hedge at least six feet in height. Gate openings which allow access to users and haulers shall be provided. Gate openings for haulers shall be a minimum of 10 feet wide and shall be capable of being secured in a closed and open position; Storage area(s) and containers shall be clearly labeled to indicate the type of materials accepted. The refuse container facility on the proposed site is pre-existing and meets this standard. FINDING: Based on the analysis above, the Mixed Solid Waste/Recycling Storage Standards have been met. Off-Street Parking and Loading (18.765): Location of vehicle parking: Off-street arking spaces for single-family and duplex dwellings and single-family attached dwellings shall be located on the same lot with the dwellings. Off-street parking lots for uses not listed above shall be located not further than 200 feet from the building or use that they are required to serve, measured in a straight line from the building with the following exceptions: a) commercial and industrial uses which require more than 40 parking spaces may provide for the spaces in excess of the required first 40 spaces up to a distance of 300 feet from the primary site; The 40 parking spaces which remain on the primary site must be available for users in the following order of priority: 1) Disabled-accessible spaces; 2) Short-term spaces; 3) Long-term preferential carpool and vanpool spaces; 4) Long-term spaces. Based on the uses proposed with the tenant changes for the subject site, the parking requirement is 3.7 spaces per 1,000 gross square feet of floor area. Based on the 32,380 square foot building, the total required number of parking spaces is 120. The applicant has re- striped the parking lot to provide a total of 121 spaces, in compliance with this standard. Therefore, this standard has been met. Joint Parking: Owners of two or more uses, structures or parcels of land may agree to utilize jointly the same parking and loading spaces when the peak hours of operation do not overlay, subject to the following: 1) The size of the joint parking facility shall be at least as large as the number of vehicle parking spaces required by the larger(est) use per Section 18.765.070; 2) Satisfactory legal evidence shall be presented to the Director in the form of deeds, leases or contracts to establish the joint use; 3) If a joint use arrangement is subsequently terminated, or if the uses change, the requirements of this title thereafter apply to each separately. Joint parking is not proposed with this application. Therefore, this standard does not apply. NOTICE OF TYPE II DECISION SDR2002-00017/CASH AND CARRY STORES PAGE 10 OF 19 Parking in Mixed-Use Projects: In mixed-use projects, the required minimum vehicle parking shall be determined using the following formula. 1) Primary use, i.e. that with the largest proportion of total floor area within the development at 100d10 of the minimum vehicle parking required for that use in Section 18.765.060 2) Secondary use, i.e., that with the second largest percentage of total floor area within the development, at 90% of the vehicle parking required-for that use in Section 18.765.060; 3) Subsequent use or uses, at 80% of the vehicle parking required for that uses) in Section 18.765.060; 4) The maximum parking allowance shall be 150% of the total minimum parking as calculated in D.1.-3. above. The parking associated with the subject site is pre-existing and has been calculated at 100 percent of the total square footage of all buildings on the site. Therefore, this standard does not apply. Visitor Parking in Multi-Family Residential Developments: Multi-dwelling units with more than 10 required parking spaces shall provide an additional 15% of vehicle parking spaces above the minimum required for the use of guests of residents of the complex. These spaces shall be centrally located or distributed throughout the development. Required bicycle parking facilities shall also be centrally located within or evenly distributed throughout the development. This project does not involve a multi-family use. Therefore, this standard does not apply. Preferential Long-Term CarpoolNanpool Parking: Parking lots providing in excess of 20 long-term parking spaces shall provide preferential long-term carpool and vanpool parking for employees, students and other regular visitors to the site. At least 5% of total long-term parking spaces shall be reserved for carpool/vanpool use. Preferential parking for carpools/vanpools shall be closer to the main entrances of the building than any other employee or student parking except parking spaces designated for use by the disabled. Preferential carpool/vanpool spaces shall be full-sized per requirements in Section 18.765.040N and shall be clearly designated for use only by carpools and vanpools between 7:00 AM and 5:30 PM Monday through Friday. The subject site is predominantly a commercial retail site, and not an office use with long term parking. Therefore, due to the short duration of time that customers visit the site, the associated parking stalls are not considered "long-term". Therefore, this criterion does not apply. Disabled-Accessible Parking: All parking areas shall be provided with the required number of parking spaces for disabled persons as specified by the State of Oregon Uniform Building Code and federal standards. Such parking spaces shall be sized, signed and marked as required by these regulations. The subject parking area has a total of 121 parking stalls, 5 of which are ADA compliant. According to ADA standards, parking lots with 100 to 200 parking stalls must provide 5 ADA accessible stalls with one of those being van accessible. This standard has been met. Access Drives: With regard to access to public streets from off-street parking: access drives from the street to off-street parking or loading areas shall be designed and constructed to facilitate the flow of traffic and provide maximum safety for pedestrian and vehicular traffic on the site,- the number and size of access drives shall be in accordance with the requirements of hapter, 18.705 Access Egress and Circulation; access drives shall be clearly and permanently marked and defined through use of rails, fences, walls or other barriers or markers on frontage not occupied by service drives; access drives shall have a minimum vision clearance in accordance with Chapter 18.795, Visual Clearance; access drives shall be improved with an asphalt or concrete surface; and excluding single-family and duplex residences, except as provided by Subsection 18.810.030.P, groups of two or more parking spaces shall be served by a service drive so that no backing movements or other maneuvering within a street or other public right-of-way will be required. NOTICE OF TYPE II DECISION SDR2002-00017/CASH AND CARRY STORES PAGE 11 OF 19 The access drive has been addressed previously in this decision under Chapter 18.705 (Access Egress and Circulation). Pedestrian Access: Pedestrian access through parking lots shall be provided in accordance with Section 18.705.030.F. Where a parking area or other vehicle area has a drop-off grade separation, the property owner shall install a wall, railing, or other barrier which will prevent a slow-moving vehicle or driverless vehicle from escaping such area and which will prevent pedestrians from walking over drop-off edges. Pedestrian access has been discussed previously in this decision under Chapter 18.705 (Access Egress and Circulation). Parking Lot Striping: Except for single-family and duplex residences, any area intended to be used to meet the off-street parking requirements as contained in this Chapter shall have all parking spaces clearly marked; and all interior drives and access aisles shall be clearly marked and signed to show direction of flow and maintain vehicular and pedestrian safety. The plans submitted show the parking stalls to be clearly marked with striping. Therefore, this standard has been satisfied. Wheel Stops: Parking spaces along the boundaries of a parking lot or adjacent to interior landscaped areas or sidewalks shall be provided with a wheel stop at least four inches high located three feet back from the front of the parking stall. The front three feet of the parking stall may be concrete, asphalt or low lying landscape material that does not exceed the height of the wheel stop. This area cannot be calculated to meet landscaping or sidewalk requirements. Wheel stops and/or curbing has been provided for all parking spaces. Space and Aisle Dimensions: Section 18.765.040.N states that: "except as modified for angled parking in Figures 18.765.1 and 18.765.2 the minimum dimensions for parking spaces are: 8.5 feet x 18.5 feet for a standard space and 7.5 feet x 16.5 feet for a compact space; aisles accommodating two direction traffic, or allowing access from both ends, shall be 24 feet in width. The applicant's plans indicate that the parking stalls associated with the proposed buildings will meet the minimum dimensions for standard parking stalls. Therefore, this standard has been satisfied. Bicycle Parking Location and Access: Section 18.765.050 states bicycle parking areas shall be provided at locations within 50 feet of primary entrances to structures; bicycle parking areas shall not be located within parking aisles, landscape areas or pedestrian ways; outdoor bicycle parking shall be visible from on-site buildings and/or the street. When the bicycle parking area is not visible from the street, directional signs shall be used to located the parking area; and bicycle parking may be located inside a building on a floor which has an outdoor entrance open for use and floor location which does not require the bicyclist to use stairs to gain access to the space. Exceptions may be made to the latter requirement for parking on upper stories within a multi-story residential building. Based on the proposed uses of the subject property, the Tigard Development Code requires 0.3 spaces per 1,000 gross square feet. This equates to 10 bicycle spaces. The applicant has not requested an adjustment to reduce this number. No indication has been made as to whether bicycle spaces are existing or are planned, therefore a condition shall be imposed to assure compliance with this standard. NOTICE OF TYPE II DECISION SDR2002-00017/CASH AND CARRY STORES PAGE 12 OF 19 Bicycle Parking Design Requirements: Section 18.765.050.C. The following design requirements apply to the installation of bicycle racks: The racks required for required bicycle parking spaces shall ensure that bicycles may be securely locked to them without undue inconvenience. Provision of bicycle lockers for long-term (employee) parking is encouraged but not required; bicycle racks must be securely anchored to the ground, wall or other structure; bicycle parking spaces shall be at least 21/2 feet by six feet long, and, when covered, with a vertical clearance of seven feet. An access aisle of at least five feet wide shall be provided and maintained beside or between each row of bicycle parking; each required bicycle parking space must be accessible without moving another bicycle; required bicycle parking spaces may not be rented or leased except where required motor vehicle parking is rented or leased. At-cost or deposit fees for bicycle parking are exempt from this requirement; and areas set aside for required bicycle parking must be clearly reserved for bicycle parking only. Outdoor bicycle parking facilities shall be surfaced with a hard surfaced material, i.e., pavers, asphalt, concrete or similar material. This surface must be designed to remain well drained. The applicant has not provided a detail of the bike rack to be used; therefore, the applicant will be required to provide a plan that shows the required bicycle rack designed according to Section 18.765.050.C. of the Tigard Development Code. Minimum Bicycle Parking Requirements: The total number of required bicycle parking spaces for each use is specified in Table 18.765.2 in Section 18.765.070.H. In no case shall there be less than two bicycle parking spaces. Bicycle parking has been discussed and conditioned above. Therefore, this standard will be met. Minimum Off-Street Parking: Section 18.765.070.H states that the minimum and maximum parking shall be as required in Table 18.765.2. Minimum off-street parking has been addressed earlier in this section. Therefore, this standard has been met. Off-Street Loading Spaces: Commercial, industrial and institutional buildings or structures to be built or altered which receive and distribute material or merchandise by truck shall provide and maintain off-street loading and maneuvering space as follows: A minimum of one loading space is required for buildings with 10,000 gross square feet or more; A minimum of two loading spaces for buildings with 40,000 gross square feet or more. The building is 32,380 square feet and will be split into two tenant areas. The primary use will be 22,608 square feet and is provided with a loading area on the west side of the building. The second tenant space is 9,772 square feet. Therefore, this standard is met. FINDING: Based on the analysis above, the off-street parking and loading standards have not been fully met, however, if the applicant complies with the conditions listed below, the standards will be fully met: CONDITION:Provide 10 bicycle parking stalls that meet the design requirements of Section 18.765.050.0. of the Tigard Development Code. Signs (18.780): Chapter 18.780.130.D lists the type of allowable signs and sign area permitted in the C-G Zoning District. Signs are reviewed through a separate permit process administered by the Development Services Technicians. Sign permits have already been issued for the proposed use and comply with the requirements of the code. NOTICE OF TYPE II DECISION SDR2002-00017/CASH AND CARRY STORES PAGE 13 OF 19 • FINDING: Because signs have been reviewed and approved as part of a separate permit process, this standard has been satisfied. Tree Removal (18.790): Section 18.790.030 requires that a tree plan for the planting, removal and protection of trees prepared by a certified arborist shall be provided with a site development review application. The tree plan shall include identification of all existing trees, identification of a program to save existing trees or mitigate tree removal over 12 inches in caliper, which trees are to be removed, protection program defining standards and methods that will be used by the applicant to protect trees during and after construction. No trees are proposed to be removed by the applicant. As no exterior construction is proposed, no tree protection plan is required either. FINDING: Based on the analysis above, the tree removal standards have been met. Visual Clearance Areas (18.795): Chapter 18.795 requires that a clear vision area shall be maintained on the corners of all property adjacent to intersecting right-of-ways or the intersection of a public street and a private driveway. A clear vision area shall contain no vehicle, hedge, planting, fence, wall structure, or temporary or permanent obstruction exceeding three (3) feet in height. The code provides that obstructions that may be located in this area shall be visually clear between three (3) and eight (8) feet in height (8) (trees may be placed within this area provided that all branches below eight (8) feet are removed). A visual clearance area is the triangular area formed by measuring a 30-foot distance along the street right- of-way and the driveway, and then connecting these two (2), 30-foot distance points with a straight line. No modifications to the visual clearance at the access points of the site are being proposed with this application. Therefore, this standard is met. FINDING: Based on the analysis above, the vision clearance standards have been met. C. SPECIFIC SITE DEVELOPMENT REVIEW APPROVAL STANDARDS Section 18.360.090(A)(2) through 18.360.090(A)(15) provides additional Site Development Review approval standards not necessarily covered by the provisions of the previously listed sections. These additional standards are addressed immediately below with the following exceptions: The proposal contains no elements related to the provisions of the following and are, therefore, found to be inapplicable as approval standards: 18.360.090.3 (Residential Exterior Elevations); 18.360.090.5 (Privacy and Noise: Multi-family or Group Living Uses); 18.360.090.6 (Private Outdoor Areas: Multi-family Use); 18.360.090.7 (Shared Outdoor Recreation Areas: Multi-family Use); 18.360.090.8 (100-year floodplain); and 18.360.090.9 (Demarcation of Spaces). The following sections were discussed previously in this decision and, therefore, will not be addressed in this section: 18.360.090.4 (Buffering, Screening and Compatibility between Adjoining Uses); 18.360.090.13 (Parking); 18.360.090.14 (Landscaping); and 18.360.090.14 (Provisions for the Disabled). Relationship to the Natural and Physical Environment: Buildings shall be: located to preserve existing trees, topography and natural drainage where possible based upon existing site conditions; located in areas not subject to ground slumping or sliding; located to provide adequate distance between adjoining buildings for adequate light, air circulation, and fire-fighting; and oriented with consideration for sun and wind. Trees shall be preserved to the extent possible. Replacement of trees is subject to the requirements of Chapter 18.790, Tree Removal. NOTICE OF TYPE II DECISION SDR2002-00017/CASH AND CARRY STORES PAGE 14 OF 19 According to the applicant, the proposed building will have no impact on existing trees located on the site. Drainage is addressed later in this decision under Chapter 18.810 (Street and Utility Improvement Standards). The existing building has a minimum of 20 feet of buffering between it and the surrounding properties. No trees will be removed as part of this project. Therefore, this standard has been satisfied. Crime Prevention and Safety: • Windows shall be located so that areas vulnerable to crime can be surveyed by the occupants; • Interior laundry and service areas shall be located in a way that they can be observed by others; • Mail boxes shall be located in lighted areas having vehicular or pedestrian traffic; • The exterior lighting levels shall be selected and the angles shall be oriented towards areas vulnerable to crime; and • Light fixtures shall be provided in areas having heavy pedestrian or vehicular traffic and in potentially dangerous areas such as parking lots, stairs, ramps and abrupt grade changes. Fixtures shall be placed at a height so that light patterns overlap at a height of seven feet, which is sufficient to illuminate a person. According to the site plan, the front of the building is visible from the parking lot, and partially visible from SW Pacific Highway. Existing parking lot lighting is adequate. An earlier condition was imposed requiring a pedestrian connection to an abutting C-P zoned property. As the location of this connection is not yet known, existing lighting conditions cannot be assessed to determine if additional lighting is necessary. However, to ensure that this standard is satisfied, once the location of the easement has been determined, the applicant shall also be required to provide illumination which overlaps at a height of seven feet, sufficiently illuminating a person. FINDING: The crime prevention standards are not fully met. CONDITION: The applicant shall demonstrate that existing lighting is sufficient to illuminate a person along the pedestrian route connection to abutting properties, or shall install additional lighting to satisfy this standard. Public Transit: Provisions within the plan shall be included for providing for transit if the development proposal is adjacent to existing or proposed transit route; the requirements for transit facilities shall be based on: the location of other transit facilities in the area; and the size and type of the proposal. The following facilities may be required after City and Tri-Met review: bus stop shelters; turnouts for buses; and connecting paths to the shelters. The site has frontage on SW Pacific Highway, which is a Tri-Met transit route. However, transit facilities are pre-existing. Therefore, this standard does not apply. Provisions of the Underlying Zone: All of the provisions and regulations of the underlying zone shall apply unless modified by other sections or this title, e.g., Planned Developments, Chapter 18.350; or a variance or adjustment granted under Chapter 18.370. Dimensional Requirements: Provisions of the (C-G) General Commercial Zoning District have been addressed earlier in this decision under Section 18.510.040.B. FINDING: Based on the analysis above, the specific standards of the Site Development Review Section have been met. D. Street And Utility Improvements Standards (Section 18.810): Chapter 18.810 provides construction standards for the implementation of public and private facilities and utilities such as streets, sewers, and drainage. The applicable standards are addressed below: NOTICE OF TYPE II DECISION SDR2002-00017/CASH AND CARRY STORES PAGE 15 OF 19 Streets: Improvements: Section 18.810.030.A.1 states that streets within a development and streets adjacent shall be improved in accordance with the TDC standards. Section 18.810.030.A.2 states that any new street or additional street width planned as a portion of an existing street shall be dedicated and improved in accordance with the TDC. Minimum Rights-of-Way and Street Widths: Section 18.810.030.E requires a arterial street to have a variable right-of-way width and three to seven lanes. Other improvements required may include on-street parking, sidewalks and bikeways, underground utilities, street lighting, storm drainage, and street trees. This site lies adjacent to SW Pacific Highway, which is classified as a five-lane arterial on the City of Tigard Transportation Plan Map. There is adequate ROW adjacent to this site at present, and the roadway is fully improved. No additional dedications or improvements will be required by ODOT. Sidewalks: Section 18.810.070.A requires that sidewalks be constructed to meet City design standards and be located on both sides of arterial, collector and local residential streets. There is a concrete sidewalk along Pacific Highway that meets this criterion. Sanitary Sewers: Sewers Required: Section 18.810.090.A requires that sanitary sewer be installed to serve each new development and to connect developments to existing mains in accordance with the provisions set forth in Design and Construction Standards for Sanitary and Surface Water Management (as adopted by Clean Water Services in 1996 and including any future revisions or amendments) and the adopted policies of the comprehensive plan. Over-sizing: Section 18.810.090.0 states that proposed sewer systems shall include consideration of additional development within the area as projected by the Comprehensive Plan. Sewer is provided by a main line in Pacific Highway. No additional public sewer line improvements are needed to support this development. Storm Drainage: General Provisions: Section 18.810.100.A states requires developers to make adequate provisions for storm water and flood water runoff. Accommodation of Upstream Drainage: Section 18.810.100.0 states that a culvert or other drainage facility shall be large enough to accommodate potential runoff from its entire upstream drainage area, whether inside or outside the development. The City Engineer shall approve the necessary size of the facility, based on the provisions of Design and Construction Standards for Sanitary and Surface Water Management (as adopted by Clean Water Services in 2000 and including any future revisions or amendments). There are no upstream public drainage ways that affect this site. Effect on Downstream Drainage: Section 18.810.100.D states that where it is anticipated by the City Engineer that the additional runoff resulting from the development will overload an existing drainage facility, the Director and Engineer shall withhold approval of the development until provisions have been made for improvement of the potential condition or until provisions have been made for storage NOTICE OF TYPE II DECISION SDR2002-00017/CASH AND CARRY STORES PAGE 16 OF 19 of additional runoff caused by the development in accordance with the Design and Construction Standards for Sanitary and Surface Water Management (as adopted by Clean Water Services in 2000 and including any future revisions or amendments). Since there will not be an increase in impervious areas on the site, this section will not apply. Bikeways and Pedestrian Pathways: Bikeway Extension: Section 18.810.110.A states that developments adjoining proposed bikeways identified on the City's adopted pedestrian/bikeway plan shall include provisions for the future extension of such bikeways through the dedication of easements or right-of-way. Pacific Highway is classified as a bike facility and presently has the width for bike lanes. ADDITIONAL CITY AND/OR AGENCY CONCERNS WITH STREET AND UTILITY IMPROVEMENT STANDARDS: Public Water System: This site is presently served by the Tualatin Valley Water District (TVWD). No additional public water line work is needed to support this development. Storm Water Quality: The City has agreed to enforce Surface Water Management (SWM) regulations established by Clean Water Services (CWS) Design and Construction Standards (adopted by Resolution and Order No. 00-7) which require the construction of on-site water quality facilities. The facilities shall be designed to remove 65 percent of the phosphorus contained in 100 percent of the storm water runoff generated from newly created impervious surfaces. In addition, a maintenance plan shall be submitted indicating the frequency and method to be used in keeping the facility maintained through the year. Since there are no additional impervious areas being created, this section will not apply. Address Assignments: The City of Tigard is responsible for assigning addresses for parcels within the City of Tigard and within the Urban Service Boundary (USB). An addressing fee in the amount of $30.00 per address shall be assessed. This fee shall be paid to the City prior to issuance of the site permit. For multi-tenant buildings, one address number is assigned to the building and then all tenant spaces are given suite numbers. The City is responsible for assigning the main address and suite numbers. This information is needed so that building permits for tenant improvements can be adequately tracked in the City's permit tracking system. Based on the information provided by the applicant, this building will be a multi-tenant building. Prior to final building inspection and issuance of a certificate of occupancy, the applicant shall provide a suite layout map so suite numbers can be assigned. The addressing fee will then be calculated based upon the number of suites that must be addressed. In multi-level structures, ground level suites shall have numbers preceded by a "1", second level suites shall have numbers preceded by a "2", etc. E. IMPACT STUDY (18.390) Section 18.360.090 states, "The Director shall make a finding with respect to each of the following criteria when approving, approving with conditions or denying an application:" Section 18.390.040 states that the applicant shall provide an impact study to quantify the effect of development on public facilities and services. For each public facility system and type of impact, the study shall propose improvements necessary to meet City standard, and to minimize the impact of the development on the public at large, public facilities systems, and affected private property users. NOTICE OF TYPE II DECISION SDR2002-00017/CASH AND CARRY STORES PAGE 17 OF 19 In situations where the Community Development Code requires the dedication of real property interests, the applicant shall either specifically concur with a requirement for public right-of-way dedication, or provide evidence that supports that the real property dedication is not roughly proportional to the projected impacts of the development. Section 18.390.040 states that when a condition of approval requires the transfer to the public of an interest in real property, the approval authority shall adopt findings which support the conclusion that the interest in real property to be transferred is roughly proportional to the impact the proposed development will have on the public. The applicant has provided an impact study addressing the project's impacts on public systems. The Washington County Traffic Impact Fee (TIF) is a mitigation measure that is required at the time of development. Based on a transportation impact study prepared by Mr. David Larson for the A-Boy Expansion/Dolan II/Resolution 95-61, TIF's are expected to recapture 32 percent of the traffic impact of new development on the Collector and Arterial Street system. The applicant will be required to pay TIF's of approximately $89,270 based on the use proposed and the trip generation study that was conducted by Group MacKenzie. Based on the estimate that total TIF fees cover 32 percent of the impact on major street improvements citywide, a fee that would cover 100 percent of this projects traffic impact is $278,968 ($89,270 divided by .32). The difference between the TIF paid, and the full impact, is considered the unmitigated impact on the collector and arterial street system. The unmitigated impact of this project on the transportation system is $189,698. A pedestrian easement has been required, but will not be dedicated to the city. Additional exactions if warranted could have been required and would have met the rough proportionality test. SECTION VII. OTHER STAFF COMMENTS The City of Tigard Police Department has reviewed the proposal and has no objections. The City of Tigard Urban Forester has reviewed the proposal and questioned whether there would be any tree impacts resulting from the addition of 7 parking spaces. As mentioned earlier in this report, the seven additional spaces were created from re-striping the existing asphalt, and no trees were impacted as a result. The City of Tigard Public Works Property Manager has reviewed the proposal and has no objections to it. SECTION VIII. AGENCY COMMENTS No separate agency comments were received. SECTION IX. PROCEDURE AND APPEAL INFORMATION Notice: Notice was posted at City Hall and mailed to: X The applicant and owners X Owner of record within the required distance X Affected government agencies Final Decision: THIS DECISION IS FINAL ON JANUARY 22, 2003 AND BECOMES EFFECTIVE ON FEBRUARY 6, 2003 UNLESS AN APPEAL IS FILED. NOTICE OF TYPE II DECISION SDR2002-00017/CASH AND CARRY STORES PAGE 18 OF 19 Appeal: The decision of the Director (Type II Procedure) or Review Authority (Type II Administrative Appeal or Type III Procedure) is final for purposes of appeal on the date that it is mailed. Any party with standing as provided in Section 18.390.040.G.1. may appeal this decision in accordance with Section 18.390.040.G.2. of the Tigard Community Development Code which provides that a written appeal together with the required fee shall be filed with the Director within ten (10) business days of the date the notice of the decision was mailed. The appeal fee schedule and forms are available from the Planning Division of Tigard City Hall, 13125 SW Hall Boulevard, Tigard, Oregon 97223. Unless the applicant is the appellant, the hearing on an appeal from the Director's Decision shall be confined to the specific issues identified in the written comments submitted by the parties during the comment period. Additional evidence concerning issues properly raised in the Notice of Appeal may be submitted by any party during the appeal hearing, subject to any additional rules of procedure that may be adopted from time to time by the appellate body. THE DEADLINE FOR FILING AN APPEAL IS AT 5:00 PM ON FEBRUARY 5, 2003. Questions: If you have any questions, please call the City of Tigard Planning Division, Tigard City Hall, 13125 SW Hall Boulevard, Tigard, Oregon at (503) 639-4171. January 22, 2003 PREPAR BY: Morg Tracy DATE Associate Planner • N/L January 22, 2003 APPR•VED BY: Richar• '. :e - - 00 ' DATE Planning Manager I:\curpin\morgan\workspace\sdr\sdr2002-00017(cash and carry)\sdr2002-00017 decision draft.doc NOTICE OF TYPE II DECISION SDR2002-00017/CASH AND CARRY STORES PAGE 19 OF 19 -----■____— CITY o I , - CO w —^ OEOGRAPNIC INFORMATION SYSTEM kV VICINITY MAP IJ ____ap cm Ir P.E19F_LE N.,. ,,,,,;., SDR2002-00017 G , � �\ CASH & CARRY , 1111. �„ . 4 `�� RETAIL STORE P Prr . PIP •.k.7:..:1111N .. CO & R Ohillt% • • E piW 1 ,` ,../,:.-,,_1...I.:— It gEF eE L Rr`- % OuR,, x Jill O 1111 1111 m -V� TparU Area Map //' • 1sr N IIII 0 100 200 300 400 500 Feet ■ V =398 lest _.J.,. ,,, ! ■ , City of Tigard Information on this map is for general location only and ' should be verified with the Development Services Division. Ir 13125 SW Hall Blvd Tigard,OR 97223 _._ A itig. (503)639-4171 ___ http:f/www ci.tigard.or.us Community Development Plot date: Dec 17,2002;C:'rnagic\MAGIC03.APR ) IT.Al. „ . ... . . • 0- \ - . • licip"'-f.-: - ,w, I �pp.oerRN LINE d^ -�- fy1[ � 9T9'1 - - - .,A o .fi r �: Smart & Final Stores /3 EXHIBIT Attn: Fernando Gallarzo SDR2002-00017 600 Citadel Drive CASH & CARRY STORE Los Angeles, CA 90040 Monaghan Farms, Inc. Attn: Tom Deline 14120 East Evans Avenue Aurora, CO 80014 Ed Christensen Welkin Engineering, P.C. 8000 SW Pfaffle Street Portland, OR 97223 AFFIDAVIT OF MAILING CITY OF TIGARD Community Deve(opment Shaping Better Community I, cPatricia L. Luns ord, being first duly sworn/affirm, on oath depose and say that I am a Senior Administrative Specialist for the City ofTigarc 'Washington County, Oregon and that I served the following: (Check Appropriate Box(s)Below) © NOTICE OF PENDING LAND USE APPLICATION FOR: SDR2002-00011/CASH & CARRY RETAIL STORE ❑ AMENDED NOTICE (File No./Name Reference) ® City of Tigard Planning Director A copy of the said notice being hereto attached, marked Exhibit"A", and by reference made a part hereof, was mailed to each named person(s) at the address(s) shown on the attached list(s), marked Exhibit"B", and by reference made a part hereof, on December 11,2002, and deposited in the United States Mail on December 11,2002, postage prepaid. (Per on ttrerepared No e) STACIE OE o EGow ) County of'Washington )ss. City of ct and ) Subscribed and sworn/affirmed before me on the day of P4c4 , 2002. ¢ . SEAL Ny IAN S.CASPER V:, / NOTARYPIJSL,C:REGON � MYCOMMISS EX fRES'fl..i 3,2 h0 A Y P �LI EGON 20� My Commission Expires: )07/ ,z EXHIBIT. A NOTICE TO MORTGAGEE, LIENHOLDER,VENDOR OR SELLER: THE TIGARD DEVELOPMENT CODE REQUIRES THAT IF YOU RECEIVE THIS NOTICE,IT SHALL BE PROMPTLY FORWARDED TO THE PURCHASER. NOTICE OF PENDING LAND USE APPLICATION SITE DEVELOPMENT REVIEW TY O ,illy CITY OF TIGARD Community Development Shaping Better Community DATE OF NOTICE: December 17, 2002 FILE NUMBER: SITE DEVELOPMENT REVIEW (SDR) 2002-00017 Type II Land Use Application FILE NAME: CASH & CARRY RETAIL STORE PROPOSAL: The applicant is requesting Site Development Review approval to convert an existing 32,380 square foot building from a furniture store (bulk sales use) to a discount grocery store (retail sales use) and future retail tenant space. Apart from re-striping the parking lot and minor facade changes, no other alterations are proposed. No variances or adjustments are proposed as well. ZONE: C-G: General Commercial District. The C-G zoning district is designed to accommodate a full range of retail, office and civic uses with a City-wide and even regional trade area. Except where non-conforming, residential uses are limited to single-family residences which are located on the same site as a permitted use. A wide range of uses, including but not limited to adult entertainment, automotive equipment repair and storage, mini-warehouses, utilities, heliports, medical centers, major event entertainment, and gasoline stations, are permitted conditionally. APPLICABLE REVIEW CRITERIA: Community Development Code Chapters 18.360, 18.390, 18.520, 18.705, 18.725, 18.745, 18.755, 18.765, 18.780, 18.795 and 18.810. LOCATION: 11745 SW Pacific Highway; WCTM 1S136CD, Tax Lot 1000. YOUR RIGHT TO PROVIDE WRITTEN COMMENTS: Prior to the City making any decision on the Application, you are hereby provided a fourteen (14) day period to submit written comments on the application to the City. THE FOURTEEN (14) DAY PERIOD ENDS AT 5:00 PM ON DECEMBER 31, 2002. All comments should be directed to Morgan Tracy, Associate Planner in the Planning Division at the City of Tigard, 13125 SW Hall Boulevard, Tigard, Oregon 97223. You may reach the City of Tigard by telephone at (503) 639-4171. ALL COMMENTS MUST BE RECEIVED BY THE CITY OF TIGARD IN WRITING PRIOR TO 5:00 PM ON THE DATE SPECIFIED ABOVE IN ORDER FOR YOUR COMMENTS TO BE CONSIDERED IN THE DECISION MAKING PROCESS THE CITY OF TIGARD APPRECIATES RECEIVING COMMENTS AND VALUES YOUR INPUT. COMMENTS WILL BE CONSIDERED AND ADDRESSED WITHIN THE NOTICE OF DECISION. A DECISION ON THIS ISSUE IS TENTATIVELY SCHEDULED FOR JANUARY 2, 2003. IF YOU PROVIDE COMMENTS, YOU WILL BE SENT A COPY OF THE FULL DECISION ONCE IT HAS BEEN RENDERED. WRITTEN COMMENTS WILL BECOME A PART OF THE PERMANENT PUBLIC RECORD AND SHALL CONTAIN THE FOLLOWING INFORMATION: • Address the specific "Applicable Review Criteria" described in the section above or any other criteria believed to be applicable to this proposal; • Raise any issues and/or concerns believed to be important with sufficient evidence to allow the City to provide a response; • Comments that provide the basis for an appeal to the Tigard Hearings Officer must address the relevant approval criteria with sufficient specificity on that issue. Failure of any party to address the relevant approval criteria with sufficient specificity may preclude subsequent appeals to the Land Use Board of Appeals or Circuit Court on that issue. Specific findings directed at the relevant approval criteria are what constitute relevant evidence. AFTER THE 14 DAY COMMENT PERIOD CLOSES, THE DIRECTOR SHALL ISSUE A TYPE II ADMINISTRATIVE DECISION. THE DIRECTOR'S DECISION SHALL BE MAILED TO THE APPLICANT AND TO OWNERS OF RECORD OF PROPERTY LOCATED WITHIN 500 FEET OF THE SUBJECT SITE, AND TO ANYONE ELSE WHO SUBMITTED WRITTEN COMMENTS OR WHO IS OTHERWISE ENTITLED TO NOTICE. THE DIRECTOR'S DECISION SHALL ADDRESS ALL OF THE RELEVANT APPROVAL CRITERIA. BASED UPON THE CRITERIA AND THE FACTS CONTAINED WITHIN THE RECORD, THE DIRECTOR SHALL APPROVE, APPROVE WITH CONDITIONS OR DENY THE REQUESTED PERMIT OR ACTION. SUMMARY OF THE DECISION-MAKING PROCESS: • The application is accepted by the City • Notice is sent to property owners of record within 500 feet of the proposed development area allowing a 14-day written comment period. • The application is reviewed by City Staff and affected agencies. • City Staff issues a written decision. • Notice of the decision is sent to the Applicant and all owners or contract purchasers of record of the site; all owners of record of property located within 500 feet of the site, as shown on the most recent property tax assessment roll; any City-recognized neighborhood group whose boundaries include the site; and any governmental agency which is entitled to notice under an intergovernmental agreement entered into with the City which includes provision for such notice or anyone who is otherwise entitled to such notice. INFORMATION/EVIDENCE AVAILABLE FOR REVIEW: The application, written comments and supporting documents relied upon by the Director to make this decision are contained within the record and are available for public review at the City of Tigard Community Development Department. Copies of these items may be obtained at a cost of $.25 per page or the current rate charged for this service. Questions regarding this application should be directed to the Planning Staff indicated on the first page of this Notice under the section titled "Your Right to Provide Written Comments." _ ' =-= - CITY of TIGARG!an, �- , pp 111 VICINITY MAP IIII IP■ a ions N, ' SDR2002-00011 \� W.A CASH & CARRY 1 \\ RETAIL STORE- 4111111111 /'--- ::-- "--\ ------ gostf -1\r\ --A a Ai a, �.r... , S r i 1,Mimi 1111 al i a Vii. r.. . ......_ _ __... b allo.,d,a ANDREWS 00 MANAGEMENT LTD CO01B 0 W 1 ESALE CORPORATION EXHIBIT .!1 11336 SW BULL MOUNTAIN RD ATTN: SE TAX DEPT 111 #104 999 KE D TIGARD,OR 97224 I AQUAH,WA 98027 1 136CC-00200 1 S 136CD-00600 AN WS MAN MENT LTD CPD LLC 11336 S L MOUNTAIN RD 10720 SW MOPA AVE #104 PORTLAND,OR 97219 T ARD,OR 972 4 1 S 136CC-00100 1 S 136CA-03700 BARASCH STEPHEN CRAUGHAN MICHAEL J&MARCHETA R BY ARGONAUT HOLDINGS INC 11260 SW 79TH AVE MC 482-C05-C82 TIGARD,OR 97223 PO BOX 300 DETROIT,MI 48265 15136CD-01800 1 S 136CB-06700 BRETTLER REAL ESTATE INC FILIBERTO DAVILA& BY CAR TOYS PINEDA CLARA L& 20 W GALER ST#300 DAVILA ARMANDO SEATTLE,WA 98121 11287 SW 81ST AVE TIGARD,OR 97223 1 S136CD-01001 1 S 136CB-06900 CHEVRON U S A INC FISHEL KAREN M&GREGG C PO BOX 285 11235 SW 81ST AVE HOUSTON,TX 77001 TIGARD,OR 97223 1 S136CB-09400 1S136CA-05400 CHONGWAY FRANK U&CHRISTINE S FISHER JOHN S SR&RENEE M 11242 SW 81ST 10940 SW 95TH TIGARD,OR 97223 TIGARD,OR 97223 1S136CD-01002 1S136CA-05401 CHRISTENSEN JILL K GALLUCCI NAOMI ALVIA TR 293 SW CERVANTES 11285 SW 78TH AVE LAKE OSWEGO,OR 97035 TIGARD,OR 97223 36C0-00401 1S136CA-03500 CHRI ' JILL K GATES MARIE 293 E' •NTES 11300 SW 79TH AVE E OSWEGO,OR 97035 TIGARD,OR 97223 1 36CD-00500 1 S 136CC-02100 CHR N JILL K GRUNBAUM HANS H AND MARILYN K 293 C VANTES TRUSTEES E OSWE OR 97035 21390 SW EDY RD SHERWOOD,OR 97140 1 S 136CD-02200 36CC-02000 COSTCO WHOLESALE CORPORATION GRU AUM NS H AND MARILYN K ATTN:EXCISE TAX DEPT 111 TRUST 999 LAKE DR 213 W E D ISSAQUAH,WA 98027 ERWOOD,OR 97140 1 S136CB-02200 1S136CD-00102 HADDIX BRYAN S MILLAR TED L TRUSTEE 11220 SW 82ND AVE BY WILLIAM C FLOBERG TIGARD,OR 97223 834 SW ST CLAIR PORTLAND,OR 97205 1 S 136CA-03200 1 S 136CD-01000 KING MARVIN FRANKLIN& MONAGHAN FARMS INC KING TRACEE SUE 14120 EAST EVANS AVE 11255 SW 79TH AVE AURORA,CO 80014 TIGARD,OR 97223 1 S 136CA-03600 1 S 136CD-00100 KNIGHT ROBERT W PACIFIC CROSSROADS PROPERTIES I 11290 SW 79TH BY WYSE INVESTMENT SERVICES CO TIGARD,OR 97223 200 SW MARKET ST STE 345 PORTLAND,OR 97201 1S1 36CA-01400 1 S 136CA-05402 LEE BEN&LAURA LIVING TRUST PEEL WILLIAM 7745 SW PFAFFLE ST 11255 SW 78TH AVE TIGARD,OR 97223 TIGARD,OR 97223 1 S 136CB-09500 1 S 136CB-02800 LEWIS SUSAN M PETERSEN MARGARET ESTATE 11268 SW 81ST AVE 8035 SW PFAFFLE ST TIGARD,OR 97223 TIGARD,OR 97223 1 S 136CA-03301 1 S 136CB-01900 LIPNOS TIMOTHY AND ANITA PFAFFLE HELEN N TR 11305 SW 79TH AVE 8225 SW PFAFFLE TIGARD,OR 97223 TIGARD,OR 97223 1 S 136CA-03300 1 S 136CA-01300 LOOS HELEN A REVOCABLE ROOT GORDON C LIVING TRUST 19935 SW CIPOLE RD BY LOOS HELEN A TR SHERWOOD,OR 97140 7935 SW PFAFFLE TIGARD,OR 97223 1 S 136CA-05300 1 S 136CB-02100 LOWRY THOMAS&KATHLEEN RORMAN JAMES M&SUSAN M 11225 SW 78TH AVE 11250 SW 82ND AVE TIGARD,OR 97223 TIGARD,OR 97223 1 S 136CB-06600 1 S 136CB-02000 LOWY GAIL E RUIZ-PRADO CUAUHTEMOC& 11315 SW 81ST AVE GERONIMO-RUIZ ROSAURA TIGARD,OR 97223 8175 SW PFAFFLE ST TIGARD,OR 97223 1 S 136CB-06800 1 36C0-005 1 MACINTYRE JACOB D TIG Y OF 11263 SW 81ST AVE 131 ALL TIGARD,OR 97223 P ARD,0 97223 1S136CB-06500 WICK MURRAY A 4460 ALHAMBRA STREET SAN DIEGO,CA 92107 1S136CA-01200 WILCOX HEATHER M 11280 SW 78TH AVE TIGARD,OR 97223 1S 136CB-09600 WOO SANG KIL AND OK SON 11300 SW 81ST AVENUE TIGARD,OR 97223 SMART & FINAL STORES ATTN: FERNANDO GALLARZO 600 CITADEL DRIVE LOS ANGELES, CA 90040 MONAGHAN FARMS, INC. ATTN: TOM DELINE 14120 EAST EVANS AVENUE AURORA, CO 80014 Jack Biethan 11023 SW Summerfield Drive, #4 Tigard, OR 97224 Sue Rorman 11250 SW 82nd Avenue Tigard, OR 97223 Naomi Gallucci 11285 SW 78th Avenue Tigard, OR 97223 Michael Trigoboff 7072 SW Barbara Lane Tigard, OR 97223 Dieter Jacobs 7775 SW Spruce Street Tigard, OR 97223 Alexander Craghead 12205 SW Hall Boulevard Tigard, OR 97223-6210 David Chapman 9840 SW Landau Place Tigard, OR 97223 Nathan and Ann Murdock PO Box 231265 Tigard, OR 97281 Brad Spring 7555 SW Spruce Street Tigard, OR 97223 ITY OF TIGARD - EAST CIT SUBCOMMITTEE (i:\curpin\setup\labels\CIT East.doc) UPDATED: April 18, 2002 L �- CITY of TIGARD tr___. 0 GEOGRAPHIC INFORMATION SYSTEM ___ Q Z rT-'--R..N °� AREA NOTIFIED OD 617sC0069Ue 6131CA163M— Tb135C0033a0 EU60003300 111360603100 O 001360906000 I,-393i6CB06700 IEUbc9095B0 - 0{V0EA16M3 (500') G136010/100 C\A136G113600 I 61I6CB0N00 w 1=1301 r� 198009001011 I \ 1 61MC100S00 100 USC9a96o0 �npM,Nr� N. - � �._...! i 6130000 0 60]60013000 ILr` i I - 6U6C90fi600 Ist91w33ad 1136 060 35 00 RO1G00110 i _I- _ FOR: Fernando Gallarzo 1 LE .11 r „ ,;,; (323-869-7591) i s311ew11w saln�ln3 11ASWg0 `�";�� RE: 1 1145 SW Pacic Hwy. Ihk \ 005 " ,...___. 66B1B0 U . ..cu.. . ,.„.. ______ ._ Property owner information P j is valid for 3 months from , the date printed on this map. .. � 1$ • ' t • ]°1°"300 0 , 1* ,,. /'- r lt, ° .t°1 i — . • ____/ — N 0 100 200 300 400 500 Feel 9.11M + P=381 feet m �. PL ICity of Tigard I L iC Information on this map is for general location only and t� Y should be verified with the Development Services Division. I ,Illi . / 13125 SW Hall Blvd L - T(503)63 97223 171 � 0 (503)639-4171 (_ http://www.ci.tgard.ocus Community Development Plot date:Sep 26,2002;C:\magicVvtAGICO3APR • 1 S 136CC-02200 101 B B-01201 ANDREWS MANAGEMENT LTD CO 0 W ESALE CORPORATION 11336 SW BULL MOUNTAIN RD ATTN: SE TAX DEPT 111 #104 999 KE D TIGARD,OR 97224 I AQUAH,WA 98027 1 136CC-00200 1 S 136CD-00600 AND' WS MAN: ' MENT LTD CPD LLC 11336 ST :• L MOUNTAIN RD 10720 SW MOPA AVE #104 PORTLAND,OR 97219 T ARD,OR 972 4 1 S136CC-00100 1 S136CA-03700 BARASCH STEPHEN CRAUGHAN MICHAEL J&MARCHETA R BY ARGONAUT HOLDINGS INC 11260 SW 79TH AVE MC 482-C05-C82 TIGARD,OR 97223 PO BOX 300 DETROIT, MI 48265 1 S 136CD-01800 1 S 136CB-06700 BRETTLER REAL ESTATE INC FILIBERTO DAVILA& BY CAR TOYS PINEDA CLARA L& 20 W GALER ST#300 DAVILA ARMANDO SEATTLE,WA 98121 11287 SW 81ST AVE TIGARD,OR 97223 1 S 136CD-01001 1 S 136CB-06900 CHEVRON U S A INC FISHEL KAREN M&GREGG C PO BOX 285 11235 SW 81ST AVE HOUSTON,TX 77001 TIGARD,OR 97223 is 136CB-09400 15136CA-05400 CHONGWAY FRANK U&CHRISTINE S FISHER JOHN S SR&RENEE M 11242 SW 81ST 10940 SW 95TH TIGARD,OR 97223 TIGARD,OR 97223 1 S 136CD-01002 1 S 136CA-05401 CHRISTENSEN JILL K GALLUCCI NAOMI ALVIA TR 293 SW CERVANTES 11285 SW 78TH AVE LAKE OSWEGO,OR 97035 TIGARD,OR 97223 - 6CD-00401 1 S 136CA-03500 CHRI JILL K GATES MARIE 293 E- •NTES 11300 SW 79TH AVE E OSWEGO,OR 97035 TIGARD,OR 97223 1- 36CD-00500 1S136CC-02100 CHR ■: N JILL K GRUNBAUM HANS H AND MARILYN K 293 • C CVANTES TRUSTEES - E OSWE • OR 97035 21390 SW EDY RD SHERWOOD,OR 97140 is 136CD-02200 36CC-02000 COSTCO WHOLESALE CORPORATION GRU AUM NS H AND MARILYN K ATTN:EXCISE TAX DEPT 111 TRUST 999 LAKE DR 213 WE D ISSAQUAH,WA 98027 ERWOOD,OR 97140 • 1 S 136CB-02200 1 S 136C D-00102 HADDIX BRYAN S MILLAR TED L TRUSTEE 11220 SW 82ND AVE BY WILLIAM C FLOBERG TIGARD, OR 97223 834 SW ST CLAIR PORTLAND,OR 97205 1 S 136CA-03200 1 S 136C D-01000 KING MARVIN FRANKLIN& MONAGHAN FARMS INC KING TRACEE SUE 14120 EAST EVANS AVE 11255 SW 79TH AVE AURORA,CO 80014 TIGARD, OR 97223 1 S 136 CA-03600 1 S 136C D-00100 KNIGHT ROBERT W PACIFIC CROSSROADS PROPERTIES I 11290 SW 79TH BY WYSE INVESTMENT SERVICES CO TIGARD,OR 97223 200 SW MARKET ST STE 345 PORTLAND,OR 97201 15136 CA-01400 1 S 136CA-05402 LEE BEN &LAURA LIVING TRUST PEEL WILLIAM 7745 SW PFAFFLE ST 11255 SW 78TH AVE TIGARD,OR 97223 TIGARD,OR 97223 1 S 136CB-09500 1 S 136C B-02800 LEWIS SUSAN M PETERSEN MARGARET ESTATE 11268 SW 81ST AVE 8035 SW PFAFFLE ST TIGARD, OR 97223 TIGARD,OR 97223 1 S 136CA-03301 15136CB-01900 LIPNOS TIMOTHY AND ANITA PFAFFLE HELEN N TR 11305 SW 79TH AVE 8225 SW PFAFFLE TIGARD, OR 97223 TIGARD,OR 97223 1 S 136CA-03300 1 S 136CA-01300 LOOS HELEN A REVOCABLE ROOT GORDON C LIVING TRUST 19935 SW CIPOLE RD BY LOOS HELEN A TR SHERWOOD,OR 97140 7935 SW PFAFFLE TIGARD, OR 97223 1 S 136CA-05300 1 S 136C B-02100 LOWRY THOMAS&KATHLEEN RORMAN JAMES M&SUSAN M 11225 SW 78TH AVE 11250 SW 82ND AVE TIGARD, OR 97223 TIGARD,OR 97223 1 S 136CB-06600 1S 136CB-02000 LOWY GAIL E RUIZ-PRADO CUAUHTEMOC& 11315 SW 81ST AVE GERONIMO-RUIZ ROSAURA TIGARD, OR 97223 8175 SW PFAFFLE ST TIGARD,OR 97223 1 S 136CB-06800 1 36CD-005 1 MACINTYRE JACOB D TIG Y OF 11263 SW 81ST AVE 13125-S ALL TIGARD,OR 97223 TrGARD,0 97223 • • 1 S136CB-06500 WICK MURRAY A 4460 ALHAMBRA STREET SAN DIEGO,CA 92107 1 S 136CA-01200 WILCOX HEATHER M 11280 SW 78TH AVE TIGARD,OR 97223 1 S 136CB-09600 WOO SANG KIL AND OK SON 11300 SW 81ST AVENUE TIGARD,OR 97223 Jack Biethan 11023 SW Summerfield Drive, #4 Tigard, OR 97224 Sue Rorman 11250 SW 82nd Avenue Tigard, OR 97223 Naomi Gallucci 11285 SW 78th Avenue Tigard, OR 97223 Michael Trigoboff 7072 SW Barbara Lane Tigard, OR 97223 Dieter Jacobs 7775 SW Spruce Street Tigard, OR 97223 Alexander Craghead 12205 SW Hall Boulevard Tigard, OR 97223-6210 David Chapman 9840 SW Landau Place Tigard, OR 97223 Nathan and Ann Murdock PO Box 231265 Tigard, OR 97281 Brad Spring 7555 SW Spruce Street Tigard, OR 97223 ITY OF TIGARD - EAST CIT SUBCOMMITTEE (i:\curpin\setup\labels\CIT East.doc) UPDATED: April 18, 2002 SEP-25-2002 WED 04 54 PM SMARTIE'INAL STORES CORP FAX NO 3208697856 P. 01 CITY OF TIGARD �, COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT ��t',i_1' PLANNING DIVISION cm Of MAIM Community DevdTopment 13125 SW HALL BOULEVARD Shaping A Better Contmunzty TIGARD, OREGON 91223 PHONE: 503-639-4171 FAX: 503-684.7297(Attn: Patty or Shirley/Planning) REI1UEST FOR i'00= 110T ', IMP ARTY OWNER. , Al N ' LISA Fy, Property owner information is valid for 3 months from the date of your request INDICATE ALL PROJECT MAP & TAX LOT NUMBERS (i.e. 1S134AB, Tax Lot 00100) OR THE ADDRESSES FOR ALL PROJECT PARCELS BELOW and INCLUDE A MAP OF ALL LOTS FOR THE PROJECT (preferably assessor's tax map): 74-S ) RAOf c. —C (/5Y% ' o . , • --0100 INDICATE WHETHER YOU ARE REQUESTING 2 OR 3 SETS OF LABELS: SE- (NOTE: A minimum of 2 sets of labels will be provided to place on your 2 sets of envelopes that applicants are required to submit at the time of application submittal. If a neighborhood meeting is required and you have not yet held that meeting, you should request 3 sets) NAME OF CONTACT PERSON: ¶es'I ■f (natt(r'LV PHONE: 3 --7 rJ This request may be mailed, faxed, or hand delivered to the City of Tigard. Please allow a 2-day minimum for processing requests. Upon completion of your request, the contact person will be called to pick up their request in "Will Call" by their last name, at the Community Development Reception Desk. The cost of processing your request must be paid at the time of pick up, as exact cost can not be pre-determined. PLEASE NOTE: FOR REASONS OF ACCURACY, ONLY ORIGINAL MAILING LABELS PROVIDED BY THE CITY VS. RE-TYPED MAILING LABELS WILL BE ACCEPTED. Cost Description; $11 to generate the mailing list, plus $2 per sheet for printing the list onto labels (20 addresses per sheet). Then, multiply the cost to print one set of labels by the number of sets requested. *EXAMPLE* * * COST FOR THIS REQUEST * * A_ sheets of labels x $2/sheet = SIQQ x sets = $16.00 sheet(s) of labels x $2/sheet = � _ x .Z sets = Z sheets of labels x $2/sheet for CIT area x.�sets = $4.00 __: ,sheet(s) of labels x$2/sheet for CIT area = x sets = GENERATE LIST = J,Q4 GENERATE LIST TOTAL = $31.00 TOTAL = $33 APPLICANT MATERIALS r .• PRE-APR HELD BY: CITY OF TIGARD PLANNING DIVISION 13125 SW HALL BOULEVARD TIGARD, OR 97223-8189 :11E' 503.639.4171/503.684.7297 CITY OF TIGARD OREGON LAND USE PERMIT APPLICATION File# ,;'P'?�L-OOOI7 Other Case# Date I . /doz. I By[ Receipt# Date Application Complete Irarl Go, TYPE OF PERMIT YOU ARE APPLYING FOR ❑ Adjustment/Variance (I or II) ❑ Minor Land Partition (II) ❑ Subdivision (II or III) ❑ Comprehensive Plan Amendment (IV) ❑ Minor Modification (I) ❑Zone Change (III) ❑ Conditional Use (III) ❑ Planned Development (Ill) ❑ Zone Change Annexation (IV) ❑ Historic Overlay (II or III) ❑ Sensitive Lands Review (I, II or III) ❑Zone Ordinance Amendment (IV) ❑ Home Occupation (I or II) Site Development Review (II) ❑ Miscellaneous (I)- (Lot Line Adjustment/Temporary Use/Tree Removal/Director's Interpretation, etc.) LOCA I ION WHERE PROPOSED AC I IVI I V WILL OCCUR(Address if available) TAX MAP 117 4 NOS. f��4 f L [51 ciD -0 I c o TOTAL SITE SIZE ZONING CLASSII-ICAI ION APPLICANT* VA v 1f Fdis A a,t +e . MAILING ADDRESS/C / T l E/ZIP C a Jvwt . Goy /¢icyvltr, C4'. /4°L/c) PHONE NO. FAX NO. .V-3 -86' 8- 75--- ) 1 3.)-3 --./ q.— 7g\-sr- PRIMARY CON FACT PERSON PHONE NO. ( PROPERI Y O NVJ ER/DEED FOLDER(Attach list if more than ope) IN\P145qi IA F-6;M•S c/o -17)M- Pe_l vif MAILING ADDRESS/CITY/STATE/ZIP 1+ I2O -E. Evers ,v-e • A..6t c 0 FOU (1 PHONE NO. FAX NO. - 743-0)av 3 743-074 2— `When the owner and the applicant are different people, the applicant must be the purchaser of record or a lessee in possession with written authorization from the owner or an agent of the owner. The owners must sign this application in the space provided on the back of this form or submit a written authorization with this application. PROPOSAL SUMMARY(Please be specific) it) !lio-w 4 ivAourf- I ►luentevt, s - t cask . - d yelca l a i re Ce,- . M O G� d t O�V1 1 Ot15 (Ora TitYvK. (#' t l a r Vli reeVve,v s Lt v-( tyre , 1.f, ►L a our v, 4^0 . - / S +b • I� of- botio . APPLICATIONS WILL NOT BE ACCEPTED WITHOUT ALL OF THE REQUIRED SUBMITTAL ELEMENTS AS DESCRIBED IN THE "BASIC SUBMITTAL REQUIREMENTS" INFORMATION SHEET. THE APPLICANT SHALL CERTIFY THAT: ♦ If the application is granted, the applicant shall exercise the rights granted in accordance with the terms and subject to all the conditions and limitations of the approval. ♦ All the above statements and the statements in the plot plan, attachments, and exhibits transmitted herewith, are true; and the applicants so acknowledge that any permit issued, based on this application, map be revoked if it is found that any such statements are false. • The applicant has read the entire contents of the application, including the policies and criteria, and understands the requirements for approving or denying the application(s). SIGNATURES OF EACH OWNER OF THE SUBJECT PROPERTY ARE REQUIRED. Owner's Signature Date Owner's Signature Date Owner's Signature Date Owner's Signature Date Owner's S'•nature Date MOM (//Ztflia-- Appli a ; ' g.nt/Representative's Signature Date Applicant/Agent/Representative's Signature Date 12-03-02 03:50PM FROM M('""NAN MGT. CORP. , PCY Nuv-2b-200? NUN 03:00 ..t7eh 1NRL S IUKt6 UUtte rHn nu, o. .tl 10Ju P . .PPl C NT SHA t CERTIFY THAI: ♦ If thea plication is granted, the applicant shall exercise the rights granted in accordance with the terms and subject to all the conditions and limitations of the approv ♦ All the above statements and the statements In the plot plan, ats, permit exhibits based transmitted herewith, are true; and the applicants so acknowledge on this application, map be revoked if It is found that any such statements are false. ♦ The applicant has read the entire contents of the application, Including the p policies and criteria, and understands the requirements for approving or denying the pp SIGNATURES OF EACH OWNER OF THE SUBJECT PROPERTY ARE REQUIRED- //4014 � li ire' , x(71 Owner's Signature Date Owner'.e Signature Date Owner's Signature Ss ignature -- � pate Owner's Signature Date Owner's Signature Data Applicant/Agent/Reprvaentative's signature Data Applicant/Agent/Rnprecentetiv.'a Signature Date • Smcirt & Final Food-Su • dies-Business-Home RECEIVED PLANNING 600 Citadel drive Commerce Ca. 90040 Fax 323-869-7856 Ph. 323-869-7591 DFC 1 3 2002 e-mail fernando,gallarzo @smartandfinal.com CITY 0{r TZAR() Project: Date: December 12, 2002 Tigard, Or 11745 SW Pacific hwy. To: City of Tigard Attn: Morgan Tracy 13125 SW Hall Blvd Tigard OR. 97223 . ............... ............ 1 TRANSMIT iii ;;; 0 Attached 0 Under separate cover via the following: O Drawings 0 Prints 0 Plans 0 Samples 0 Specifications 0 Sepias O Copy of Letter 0 Change Order 0 Other ri sc toiiti ... . .. .. .. ..jjl � ©ate hio De .. . . ....... ..... . 1 19 sets of material as requested TEE P.1 RANSMMi 0D 0H I<EI si~Pw�: O For approval 0 Approved as submitted 0 Resubmit copies for approval O For your use 0 Approved as noted 0 Submit copies for distribution 0 As requested 0 Returned for corrections 0 Return corrected prints O For review & comment 0 0 FOR BIDS DUE 0 PRINTS RETURNED AFTER LOAN TO US ............... .............. Morgan, we did not keep a copy of the original back sheet of application with owl- s approval can you insert your copy into this package, thanks, Thank you. ; ■ CC: file SIGNED: •2:1.. _ RO GALLARZO I Con ion Project Manager Smart&Final. Food•Supplies•Busi nest•Home 600 Citadel Drive Commerce,CA 90040-1562 Phone(323)869-7591 Fax(323)869-7856 November 8, 2002 City of Tigard Mr. Morgan Tracy 13125 SW Hall Blvd Tigard, Oregon, 97223 Re: Site Development Review-Neighborhood meeting Proposed Cash &Carry 11745 SW Pacific Hwy. Dear Morgan, On October 23 2002, Cash & Carry held a neighborhood meeting at the Tigard City Hall— Red Rock Creek Room. In attendance from Cash & Carry were; Fernando Gallarzo-Project Manager Dan Kaufman- District Manager John Mattews-Merchandising & Marketing Rick Ward- RBI Construction Jim Bray-RBI Construction. Attending from the community was; Mr. Ed Christensen, address 800 SW Pfaff le The required Statement of Purpose was read to all. A brief description of our submittal &review of our site plan&floor plan was noted. Dan Kaufman gave an overview of what Cash&Carry's products and services are. Mr Christensen had no problems with our use and development at the subject site. Mr. Christensen however had his own agenda with regards to the possibility of gaining a reciprocal access thru our property to his own at the rear. I informed Mr. Christensen that we are only a tenant, at that he would have to take this up with the property owners and the City. Please call me should you have any questions or concerns regarding this. Sincer:;j , Ferna •o Gallarzo - •'ect a .0.er-Construction mart S Fi 600 Citadel Drive Commerce,CA 90040-1562 Phone(323)869-7591 Fax(323)869-7856 E-mail:femando.gallarzo@smartandfinal.com „ _ Smart& Final Food.Supplies•Business•Home ClifSk,GWIT CM United Grocers October 7,2002 Re: United Grocers-Cash&Carry Dear Interested Party, Smart&Final is the Owner representing the United Grocerrs Cash&Carry at the property located at 11745 SW Pacific Hwy-(formerly Home Life). We are considering proposing a Site Development review at this location. Prior to applying to the city of Tigard for the necessary permits, I would like to discuss the proposal in more detail with the surrounding property owners and residents. You are invited to attend a meeting on: October 23 2002 Tigard City Hall- Red Rock Creek room 13125 SW Hall Blvd Tigard, Or. At 7:00 pm Please notice this will be an informational meeting on preliminary plans. These plans may be altered prior to the submittal of the application to the city. I look forward to more specifically discussing the proposal with you. Please call me at 1-800- 427-3443 extension 7591 if you have any questions or call our local office in Portland at 503- 833-1190 ask for John Mathews. Sincerely,'_ ______=1...... - Fernan . larzo Con I + Project Manager • AFFIDAVIT OF MAILIWG/POSTING NEIGHBORHOviI) MEETING NOTICE IMPORTANT NOTICE: THE APPLICANT IS REQUIRED TO MAIL THE CITY OF TIGARD A COPY OF THE NEIGHBORHOOD MEETING NOTICE THAT PERTAINS TO THIS AFFIDAVIT AT THE SAME TIME PROPERTY OWNERS ARE MAILED NOTICE, TO THE ADDRESS BELOW: City of Tigard Planning Division 13125 SW Hall Boulevard Tigard, OR 97223-8189 IN ADDITION, THE APPLICANT SHALL SUBMIT THIS AFFIDAVIT & COPIES OF ALL NOTICES AT THE TIME OF APPLICATION. MAILING: r- 1, FeviAcAKoo Ct(A►O , being duly sworn, depose and say that on the ,day of 1')e-1/` 20 02- , I caused to have mailed to ach of the persons on the attached list, a notice of a meeting to discuss a proposed development at (or near) 11716 5W i , a copy of which notice so mailed is attached hereto and made a part of hereof. I further state that said notices were enclosed in envelopes plainly addressed to said persons and were deposited on the date indicated above in the United States Post Office located at '1./5. S �� ( , with postage prepaid thereon. �s •, 1 _ tS Signatur, ( the presence of a Notary Public) POSTING: I, ay.cic G t\cY2.4) , do affirm that I am (represent) the party initiating interest in a proposed e StA k C.U✓'rui affecting the land located at (state the approximate location(s) IF no address(s)and/or tax lot(s) currently r.gistered) -s w �AG 1 `G � and did on the gam" day •f a �' • , 20 02.. personally post notice indicating that the site may be proposed for a L HI application, and the time, date and place of a neighborhood meeting to discuss the proposal. 1 f The sign was posted at VI-5- S(A) fAcr- 1 Fl C R W`t. (state location you posted notice on property) Signer re s(In the presence of a Notary Public) (THIS SECTION FOR A STATE OF OREGON, NOTARY • BLIC TO COMPLETE/NOTARIZE) STATE OF Ld`AcorNita ) County of Cps A> le, ) ss. Subscribed and sworn/affirmed before me on the �� day of uc:\DD V , 20 . Commission*1322422 I Notary Public-California C, Los Angeles County MY COM.Expires Sep 27,nxb 19 ! Q • '�"�' N�plies R • , BLIC OF ORT My Commis ion Expires: Applicant, please complete the information below: NAME OF PROJECT OR PROPOSED DEVELOPMENT: TYPE OF PROPOSED DEVELOPMENT: Address or General Location of Subject Property: Subject Property Tax Map(s)and Lot#(s): h:\Joginlpattylmasters\affidavit of marling-posting neighborhood meeting.doc Aifevdees. A „ _______/ (4. -4 - 5 1 . i I• I2 15 SEP-13-2002 FRI 01 :59 PM SMART&FINAL STORES CORP FAX NO. 3238697856 P. 01 Smart&Fina I. Food.Supplies•Business.Home 600 Citadel Drive Commerce,CA 90040-1562 Phone(323)869-7591 Fax(323)869-78s6 SENT VIA FAX TO 503-684-7297 September 13, 2002 City of Tigard Mr. Morgan Tracy 13125 SW Hall Blvd Tigard, Oregon, 97223 Re: 11745 SW Pacific Hwy_ Proposed Cash & Carry Dear Morgan, Smart& Final Inc- hereby request that the city accept our Plans for construction for plan check review and permitting. Smart& Final Inc. hereby acknowledges that we do so knowingly that we are still under review by the planning department and accept all conditions of forthcoming approval. Further more we will not hold the city of Tigard liable for any cost associated with the approval above and beyond what we have submitted under our Building plans. Please call me should you have any questions or concerns regarding this matter Since -ly, F: •oG-llerzo • . M:z,..or-Construction Smari.O. Final 600 Citadel Drive Commerce,CA 90040.1562 Phone(323)869-7591 Fax(323)869-7856 E-mail:ternando.galfmrasrnartancljial.corn AUG-27-2002 TUE 01 16 PM SMART&FINAL STORES CORP FAX NO. 32'18697856 P. 01 Smart&Final Food Supplies•Business•Home 600 Citadel Drive City of Commerce Ca.9004 Fax# 323 869-7856 City of Tigard, Oregon Planning Department Mr. Morgan Tracy 13125 SW Hall Blvd. Tigard, Or. 97223 Re: 11745 SW Pacific hwy. Site modification issues. Dear Morgan, Thank you for meeting me in person on Tuesday to discuss further our issue you brought to my attention via your e-mail dated August 16. 2002 Based on the information we obtained from you, here is our response on where we stand with regards to being subjected to a major Modification request. Cash & Carry is a provider of business-related food &janitorial supplies. We sell products that are both packaged and sold by the Case.We also sell the same products individually for convenience In reviewing the previous building user, you have stated numerous times that Home Life was considered a "Bulk Sales' user. We are to some degree the same. We sell by the case and by the pallet. We are nowhere near to be considered a supermarket. Based on your classification categories, Cash & Carry should be classified as retail specialty center. We are a specialty. By dividing the building space and having common reciprocal access to the shopping center to the west of us, we should be considered a center, in that regard. Our building comprises of 32,380 S.F. The trip generated by this classification per 1000 S.F. of area is 40.68. Based on this we would generate 795 trips per day Our current weekly transaction average for the surrounding Portland stores is generating about 289 customer transactions per day. Our Tigard store is expected to cannibalize some business from our Aloha store for which we anticipate the average daily transaction for both locations to be around 230 once both stores are open. if.`14:"--vrAdl $33. I l 62o AUG-27-2002 TUE 01 16 PM SMAPT&FINAL STORES CORP FAX NO. 3928697856 P. 02 Page 2 As you can see our business will generate only 1/3 of what we are classified under. We formally request that the city consider Cash Carry as a retail user selling " Bulk related items. Please review this information with your staff. Please feel free to e-mail or call me should you have any further concerns. Your immediate response is greatly appreciated. Since- , Fernan.o Gallarzo Construction project manager AUG-15-2002 THU 09:01 AM SI'1ADT&FINAL STORES CORP FAX NO. 32 8697856 P. 02 08-14-02 04.52PM FROM MONavdAN MGT. CORP. . P03 ExiraIT "A" LEOIL DeSCRIPTION PARCEL I, A tract of land in the Southeast one quarter of the Southwest one quarter of Section 36, Township 1 South, Range 1 West, of the Willamette Meridian, in the county of Washington and State of Oregon, described as fellow: Beginning at a 5/8 inch iron rod with yellow plastic cap inscribed "W.B. WBLLA" at the Southwest corner of that tract of land described as Parcel II in Deed Document No. 90-31286 recorded at the Washington County Deed Recorder thence North 13.20'64" went &long the west line of said described Parcel II, 323.06 feet to a 5/8 inch iron rod with yellow plastic cap inscribed "G & L PLS 1989": thence South 89•29'57" Bast leaving Said West line, 316.24 feet to a 5/B inch iron rod with yellow plastic cap inscribed "0 & L PLS 1969"; thence North 0022'56" West 37.00 feet along the West line of that tract conveyed to Ted L. Millar, Trustee of The Ted L. Millar Living Trust by Deed recorded May 11, 1994 as. Recorder's Fee No. 94046177 to a point; thence South 89.29'57" Beet 130.03 feet toe point on the Sant line of said Millar Trust Tract, thence South 0°22'66" Beet 121,69 feet along the Bast line of paid Miller Trust Tract' to a 5/8 inch iron rod with yellow plastic cap inscribed "0 & L P15 1989"; thence South 58°34' 09" Wept, 49.05 teat to a 5/8 inch iron rod with yellow plastic cap inscribed "G & L PLS 1989" and a point in the South line of said Millar Trust Tract; thence North 89°1.7'21" West, 42.03 fest to a 3/4 inch iron pipe, thence South 2 034'00" Bast, 185.12 feet to a 5/e inch iron rod et a point-on-curve on the North right-of-war boundary of S.W. Pacific Highway;: thence along a 11,389.16 foot radius curve to the right, having a central angle of 0"30'44", a chord bearing South 59°25'48" West, and a chord distance 101.81 feet, along said North right-of-way, 101,61 feet to a 5/8 inch iron rod with yellow plastic Cap inscribed "W.H, Wells"; thence North 13"0'54" West leaving said right-of-way and along the Bast line of Parcel I of that tract Conveyed to chevron U.S.A„ Inc. by Deed recorded aN Recorder's Fee No. 90-31285, 150.00 feet to a 5/8 inch iron rod with yellow plastic cap inscribed "W.B. Walls" and the Northeast corner thereof? thence South 60°11'30" West along the North line of Said Chevron U.S.A., Inc. Tract, 201.00 feet to the point of beginning. PARCEL II: A non-exclusive easement for ingress and egress over the new easement area and for utility purposes under the new easement area as set forth in Amendment to Agreement for Common Easement recorded August 23, 1994 as Recorder's Pee No. 94077512, Washington County Records, described as follows A tract of land in the Southeast one quarter of the Southwest one quarter of Section 36, Township 1 South, Range 1 West of the Willamette Meridian, being more particularly described as follows: Beginning at a 5/8 inch iron rod with yellow plastic cap inscribed W. B, Wells" at the Southwest corner,of that tract of land described as Parcel II in Deed Document No. 90-31286 recorded at the Washington County Peed Records; thence North 60°11'30" East 201.00 feet to a 5/8 inch iron rod with yellow plastic cap inscribed "W. B. Wells"; thence South 13°20'54" Bait 103 ,51 toet to a point, said point being the true point of beginning, thence North 59°25'48" Beet, 111.66 feet to a point, said point being South 2°34' 00" Bast 134.83 feat from a 3/4 inch iron pipe; thence South 2°34'00" Sept. 34.39 feet to a point; thence South 30"51'60" Bast, 14.00 teat to a point on the Northwesterly right of way boundary of S.W. Pacific Highway. said point marking the 3 • AUG-15-2002 THU 09:01 AM SM^nT&FINAL STORES CORP FAX NO. 32q8697856 P. 03 08-14-02 04:52PM FROM MONAunAN MGI, CORP. . PO4 LI= DESCRIPTION non-tangent beginning of an 11,389.16 foot radius curve to the right having a central angle of 0 011'46", a chard bearing of South 59'14' 03" West, and a chord distance of 39.00 feet, thence along said curve to the right and along paid right of way boundary, 39.00 feet to a point Of non-tangency' thence North 30.40'04" West, 14.50 feet to a point; thence South 59.25'48" Went, 65.86 fent to a point, said point being North 13 61 0'54" West 15.08 feet from a 5/8 inch iron rod with yellow plastic cap inscribed.. ow. E. Wells" , thence North 13•20'54" West, 31.41 feet to the true point of beginning. EXCEPTING TWRREFROM that portion thereof lying within Parcel I described above, • • • AUG-15-2002 THU 09:01 AM SMART&FINAL STORES CORP FAX NO. 3238697856 P. 04 08-14-02 04:52PM FROM , ,,GHAN MGT. CORP. . P02 214 • • S WARRANTY DSSD - STATuTORY FORM 3615 (INDIVIDUAL or CORPORATION) 0 TED L.MILLAR, Trustee of Tee Ten L. MIL ,AR LivZNO TRUST Grantor, conveys and warrants to MONAGHAN FARMS, INC., a Colorado corporation /together with all mineral a water rights Grantee, the following described real property free of encumbrAnCea except as specifically set forth herein: 4 43 PLUA+R SIB ATTACHRD EXHIBIT "A", made a part hereof. - (Continued) i.its,, This inetrvaant will not allow use or the property described in this instrument is>, etelatten of applicable land use laws end reuuletioas. Retort' signing or accepting this instrument, F eh* Parson wcquiring fee title to the property should check with the appropriate city or county planning department to verity approved uses and to determine any limits 4741 lawsuits f" RUCOMBRANCESI again st farming or !caveat practices as defined in ORO 30.930. S• See Attached Exhibit "E", made a part hereof. .. ' �. VOISMINSTON COUNTY kJ ,..- MID � are The true consideration for this Conveyance is ., i1.0..!! Dated �n. 5--Si"-Si -9� ; if a corporate grantor, it has caused its name to be signed by order of its board of directors. Tfd L. Mi far Liv1n T st BX�� . ITS :X3 st • STATH OP OREGON, County of Multnandh )se. . This instrument was acknowledged before me on by 199 , This instrument was acknowledged before me an May ,by Ted-L. mi l far __47 19 95 se Trustee • of the Tod L. M1llar Living Trupt oinciaALARAL Notary fat Puc o! ;/n�CfCaji�—�+ My commission ex as �°Q a !p- I Mr GOMMII$ION SXSIRS��.R1,1N -After recording return for Monaghan Farms, Inc. 14120 East Evans Avenue i►urora r OO. 80014 Until a change is requested all tax • atatemencs shall be sent to the following address: same as above Escrow No. 50000-6o86-80 Order No. 137380 , • Smart & Final® RECEIVED PLANNING Food-Su . 'lies-Business-Home 600 Citadel drive Commerce Ca. 90040 Fax 323-869-7856 Ph. 323-869-7591 AUG 1 9 2002 e-mail fernando,gallarzo@smartandfinal.com CITY OF TCARD LETTER OF TONSMOIA(:::1:1:1:::1:11:1:::: Project: Cash & Carry Date: August 15, 2002 # 577 Tigard To: City Of Tigard Attn: Mr Morgan Tracy 13125 SW Hall Blvd Tigard , or 97223 I TRANSIVIIrr ' ' '':0 Attached ::,,...,......,.......H.:..:;::::: ::::]:i*:: 0 Under separate cover via the following: 0 Drawings 0 Prints 0 Plans 0 Samples 0 Specifications 0 Sepias 0 Copy of Letter 0 Change Order 0 Other 1.:::::4000iiiii::::::i::::00t0 No ::::1*400100.iliqiiiiiitiiiiiiiiiiiii:iiiiiiii:iiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiaiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiii::::::::: 1 Property deed information OICS ::41.fiWNP,VirMil::::0:PltIgPgl)B040*:111111111illifiiiiiiiiiiiilillii1:; 0 For approval 0 Approved as submitted 0 Resubmit copies for a 0 For your use 0 Approved as noted 0 Submit copies for dis 0 As requested 0 Returned for corrections 0 Return corrected pri 0 For review & comment 0 0 FOR BIDS DUE 0 PRINTS RETURNED AFTER LOAN TO US I — Thank you. ,.._r_...insii.,- CC: file SIGNED: -"""I' ` . ;411 ,NDO GALLARZO C. ruction Project Man 08-14-02 04:52PM FROM Mc'°'"IHAN MGT. CORP, . P33 EXHBIT "A° LEGAL DESCRIPTION 4 PARCEL I: A tract of land in the Southeast one quarter of the Southwest one quarter of Section 36, Township 1 South, Range 1 West, of the Willamette Meridian, in the County of Washington and State of Oregon, described as follows: Beginning at a 5/8 inch iron rod with yellow plastic cap inscribed "W.B. WELLS" at the Southwest corner of that tract of land described as Parcel. II in Deed Document No. 90-31286 recorded at the Washington County Deed Records; thence North 13°20'54" west along the West line of said described Parcel II, 323.06 feet to a 5/8 inch iron rod with yellow plastic cap inscribed "G & L PLS 1989"; thence South 89.29'57" East leaving said West line, 316.24 feet to a 5/8 inch iron rod with yellow plastic cap inscribed "G & L PLS 1989"; thence North 0°22'56" West 27.00 feet along the West line of that tract conveyed to Ted L. Millar, Trustee of The Ted L. Millar Living Trust by Deed recorded May 11, 1994 as Recorder's Fee No. 94046177 to a point; thence South 89'29'57" East 130.03 feet to' a point on the East line of said Millar Trust Tract; thence South 0°22' 56" East 121.69 feet along the East line of said Millar Trust Tract to a 5/8 inch iron rod with yellow plastic cap inscribed "G & L PLS 1989"; thence. ' South 58°34' 09" West, 49.05 feet to a 5/8 inch iron rod with yellow plastic cap inscribed "G & L PLS 1989" and a point in the South line of said Millar Trust Tract; thence North 89°17'21" West, 42.03 feet to a 3/4 inch iron pipe; thence South 2°34'00" East, 185.12 feet to a 5/8 inch iron rod at a point-on-curve on the North right-of-way boundary of S.W. Pacific Highway; thence along a 11,389.16 foot radius curve to the right, having a central angle of 0°30'44", a chord bearing South 59°25'48" West, and a chord distance 101.81 feet, along said North right-of-way, 101.81 feet to a 5/8 inch iron rod with yellow plastic cap inscribed "W.B. Wells"; thence North 13° 0'54" West leaving said right-of-way and along the East line of Parcel I of that tract conveyed to Chevron U.S.A„ Inc. by Deed recorded as Recorder's Fee No. 90-31285, 150.00 feet to a 5/8 inch iron rod with yellow plastic cap inscribed "W.B. Wells" and the Northeast corner thereof; thence South 60°11'30" West along the North line of said Chevron U.S.A., Inc. Tract, 201.00 feet to the point of beginning. PARCEL II: A non-exclusive easement for ingress and egress over the new easement area and for utility purposes under the new easement area as set forth in Amendment to Agreement for Common Easement recorded August 23, 1994 as Recorder's Fee No. 94077512, Washington County Records, described as follows: A tract of land in the Southeast one quarter of the Southwest one quarter of Section 36, Township 1 South, Range 1 West of the Willamette Meridian, being more particularly described as follows: Beginning at a 5/8 inch iron rod with yellow plastic cap inscribed "W. B. Wells" at the Southwest corner.of that tract of land described as Parcel II in Deed Document No. 90-31286 recorded at the Washington County Deed Records; thence North 60°11'30" East 201.00 feet to a 5/8 inch iron rod with yellow plastic cap inscribed "W. B. Wells"; thence South 13°20'54" East 103.51 feet to a point, said point being the true point of beginning; thence North 59°25'48" East, 111.66 feet to a point, said point being South 2°34'00" East 134.83 feet from a 3/4 inch iron pipe; thence South 2°34'00" Bast, 34 .39 feet to a point; thence South 30°51'50" East, 14.00 feet to a point on the Northwesterly right of way boundary of S.W. Pacific Highway, said point marking the 08-14-02 04:52PM FROM M0w^-HAN MGT. CORP_ PO4 • • LEGAL DESCRIPTION non-tangent beginning of an 11,389.16 foot radius Curve to the right having a central angle of 0°11'46', a chord bearing of South 59'14'03" Weet, and a chord distance of 39.00 feet; thence along maid curve to the right and along said right of way boundary, 39.00 feet to a point of non-tangency; thence North 30°40'04" West, 14.50 feet to a point; thence South 59°25'48" Weet, 65.86 feet to a point, said point being North 13°20' 54" West 15.08 feet from a 5/8 inch iron rod with yellow plastic cap inscribed .. "W. B. Wells"; thence North 13'20'54" West, 31.41 feet to the true point of beginning, EXCEPTING THEREFROM that portion thereof lying within Parcel I described above. • r • .` .08-14-02 04:52PM FROM N.. JHAN MGT. CORP. . P02 '7.0 WARRANTY DEED - STATUTORY FORM 3615 (INDIVIDUAL or CORPORATION) 0 TED L.MILLAR, Trustee of TH8 TED L. MILS LIVING TRUST Grantor, conveys and warrants to MONAGHAN FARMS, INC., a Colorado corporation /together with all mineral & water rights Grantee, the following described real property free of encumbrances except as specifically set forth herein: 0 PLEASE SEE ATTACHED EXHIBIT "A", made a part hereof. r (Continued) M This instrument will not allow use of the property described in this instrument in violation of applicable land use lawn and regulations. Before signing or accepting this instrument, c the person •Cquiring fee title to the property should check with the appropriate city or county planning department to verify approved uses and to determine any limits on lawsuits against farming or forest practices as defined in ORS 30.930. Q ENCUMBRANCES: , , . U S See Attached Exhibit "B", made a part hereof. . .: ' NM1l11NGTON COUNTY �- 5. 31 $3 , od y,,,.. rU MUD On ., i o to The true consideration for this conveyance is ,;.,. :.:Ls.. - : L7 v . Y Dated 5-3I -9s corporate g if a co orate raptor, it has caused its name to be signed by order of its board of directors. Ted L. Mi lar Livin T WO V.Pc:?4"114.1. - , ITS: Ir:.LSQe. • STATE OF OREGON, County of Multnomah )ss. . This instrument was acknowledged before me on 12; 31 , 19 • by This instrument was acknowledged before ma on Mai ■-g/ , 19 95 , by Ted L. Miller as Trustee of the Ted L. Millar /�Living T,rust -- - N �l;LICOR�ON Notary fo,. 112P14/)/1. c or Oregon i . ...j C;CMM�ritON NO.01Q{21 My commission ex ea / .3 r 5 I MYCOMMISSION Wows Dec.ti,1i1i -After recording return to: Monaghan Farms, Inc. 14120 East Evans Avenue Aurora, CO. 80014 Until a change is requested all tax statements shall be sent to the following address: same as above E5Crow No. 50000-6088-BC 4 . Order No. 137280 . Smart&Final. Fbod•Supplies•Businesa•Home 600 Citadel Drive Commerce,CA 90040-1562 Phone(323)869-7591 Fax(323)869-7856 July 22, 2002 City of Tigard Mr. Morgan Tracy 13125 SW Hall Blvd Tigard, Oregon, 97223 Re: 11745 SW Pacific Hwy. Proposed Cash & Carry Dear Morgan, Smart & Final Inc. hereby formally request that the city of Tigard review our site plan for parking modification. Currently there are 115 spaces provided, whereas the current use only requires 33 under the Bulk Sales classification. Cash & Carry is a retail classification. Between our sublease space and us we will require 120 parking spaces. We have made our adjustment to include 50% compact use. Our revised plan shows 121 spaces provided. Smart & Final Inc. hereby formally request that the city of Tigard review our Exterior elevation plan for modification. Our intention is to add a Metal canopy to the sides of the current building tower. This metal awning is a building element used thruout the Cash & Carry chain. Please call me should you have any questions or concerns regarding this submittal. Sinc�-ly, Ferna •o :Ilarzo Pr -Construction 600 Citadel Drive Commerce,CA 90040-1562 Phone(323)869-7591 Fax(323)869-7856 E-mail:fernando.gallarzo @smartandfinal.com K/P054 I,/AIarro h' SUMMARY OF PROPOSAL November 25, 2002 SITE DESIGN REVIEW APPLICATION for : 11745 SW Pacific Hwy. PROPOSED DEVELOPMENT: The proposed development utilizes the existing 1 story commercial building formally used by HOME LIFE, which comprises of 32,380 total square feet. Cash&Carry will build out 22,608 s.f. for it's use and partition off the balance 9,772 s.f.for sublease purposes. Current site consist of 113 parking spaces. For our use we added an additional 7 spaces by incorporating some compact spaces for the required 120 spaces the development requires. PROPOSED USE: The proposed site falls in the CG zoning. Cash & Carry and the proposed tenant are factored to comply with the allowed zoning set by the city of Tigard. The uses will be compatible with the uses on the adjacent properties and there were not any negative comments from the affected neighbors or any members of the Tigard Community Involvement Teams, which were contacted for a public meeting held on October 23, 2002. A traffic study was completed by Group Mackenzie on October 22, 2002. The city of Tigard approved the study and imposed TIF's as mandated by ITE manual. Fee's for traffic Impact fee's are attached in the amount of 27, 998.00 This application is being submitted for a Full site Development Review, when originally a minor modification was thought. Full Site review is in accordance with the requirements of section 18.360.050(B)(7) Smart&Final Fbod•Supplies•Buaineaa•Home 600 Citadel Drive Commerce,CA 90040-1562 Phone(323)869-7591 Fax(323)869-7856 November 25, 2002 City of Tigard Mr. Morgan Tracy 13125 SW Hall Blvd Tigard, Oregon, 97223 Re: IMPACT STUDY 11745 SW Pacific Hwy, Proposed Cash &Carry Dear Morgan, Below are the Impacts created as a result of our proposed occupancy to the referenced location. Traffic: See attached report-based on our use we have calculated a parking demand of about 50 spaces required. Based on the projects size and city requirements we are required to provide 120 spaces. As you can see, our use will not impact the traffic allowance for the subject site. Water& Sewer- To the original site, we are adding about 2 water dosets and 2 lays to the originally approved site. Based on our Daily customer count, we do not see and increase to the existing facilities provided. Noise-Currently the property is well landscaped with bountiful tree sound barriers between us and surrounding neighbors. Our store deliveries will be performed between allowable times as set forth in the cities noise ordinance. Transportation-Public-The core of our customers is business based, buying in large quantities. We do not anticipate any of our customers to be users of public transportation. Please call me should you have any questions or concerns regarding these statements. Sincerely, Fernando GaNarzo Pr ' Man er-Construction 600 Citadel Drive Commerce,CA 90040-1562 Phone(323)869-7591 Fax(323)869-7856 E-mail:Frnando.gallarzo@smartandfinal.com DATE: PLANS CHECK NO Oct.3, 2002 PROJECT TITLE. COUNTYWIDE Smart & Final TRAFFIC IMPACT FEE WORKSHEET APPLICANT. (FOR NON-SINGLE FAMILY USES) MAILING ADDRESS: CITY/ZIP/PHONE: TAX MAP NO.: SITES NO ADDRESS: LAND USE CATEGORY RATE PER TRIP RESIDENTIAL $ 239.00 X BUSINESS AND COMMERCIAL $ 60.00 OFFICE $ 220.00 Estimate partial building INDUSTRIAL $ 230.00 INSTITUTIONAL $ 99.00 3/� PAYMENT METHOD: CD °/ CASH/CHECK CREDIT BANCROFT(PROMISSORY NOTE) USE LAND CATEGORY DESCRIPTION OF USE WEEKDAY AVG INSTITUTIONAL ONLY DEFER TO OCCUPANCY 815 Discount store TRIP RATE 70.16 WEEKEND AVG.TRIP RATE BASIS: The applicant proposes converting 22,608 sq. ft. of a furniture store to discount store CALCULATIONS: TIF = (( Week day Avg. Trips X T.G.S.F.) - credit ) X Rate Per Trip $89,270 = (( 70.16 X 22.608 ) - ( 4.35 X 22.608 )) X $60 Transit Amt. = Projected Trip Rate X $18 $26,784 = 1488 X $18 PROJECT TRIP GENERATION: 1488 FEE: $89,270 FOR ACCOUNTING PURPOSES ONLY ADDITIONAL NOTES' 98 trip credit applied for previous use (#890 furniture store 4.35 trip rate) ROAD AMT. $62,486 TRANSIT AMT. $26,784 PREPARED BY S.S. Casper I:TIFWKST.DOG (DST) EFF: 07-01-98 CITY OF TIGARD Community Development Shaping (Better Community LAND USE PROPOSAL DESCRIPTION 120 DAYS = 4115/2003 FILE NO.: SITE DEVELOPMENT REVIEW (SDR) 2002-00017 Type II Land Use Application FILE TITLE: CASH & CARRY RETAIL STORE APPLICANT: Smart & Final Stores OWNER: Monaghan Farms, Inc. Attn: Fernando Gallarzo Attn: Tom Deline 600 Citadel Drive 14120 East Evans Avenue Los Angeles, CA 90040 Aurora, CO 80014 REQUEST: The applicant is requesting Site Development Review approval to convert an existing 32,380 square foot building from a furniture store (bulk sales use) to a discount grocery store (retail sales use) and future retail tenant space. Apart from re-striping the parking lot and minor facade changes, no other alterations are proposed. No variances or adjustments are proposed as well. LOCATION: 11745 SW Pacific Highway; WCTM 1 S136CD, Tax Lot 1000. ZONE: C-G: General Commercial District. The C-G zoning district is designed to accommodate a full range of retail, office and civic uses with a City-wide and even regional trade area. Except where non-conforming, residential uses are limited to single-family residences which are located on the same site as a permitted use. A wide range of uses, including but not limited to adult entertainment, automotive equipment repair and storage, mini-warehouses, utilities, heliports, medical centers, major event entertainment, and gasoline stations, are permitted conditionally. APPLICABLE REVIEW Community Development Code Chapters 18.360, 18.390, 18.520, 18.705, 18.725, CRITERIA: 18.745, 18.755, 18.765, 18.780, 18.795 and 18.810. CIT AREA: East CIT FACILITATOR: List Available Upon Request DECISION MAKING BODY BELOW: ❑ TYPE I ® TYPE II ❑ TYPE III ❑ TYPE IV DATE COMMENTS WERE SENT: DECEMBER 17, 2002 DATE COMMENTS ARE DUE: DECEMBER 31, 2002 LJ HEARINGS OFFICER (MON.) DATE OF HEARING: TIME: 7:00 PM ❑PLANNING COMMISSION (MON.) DATE OF HEARING: TIME: 7:00 PM ❑CITY COUNCIL (TUES.) DATE OF HEARING: TIME: 7:30 PM Z STAFF DECISION (TENTATIVE) DATE OF DECISION: JANUARY 2, 2003 COMPONENTS RELATED TO THE PROJECT AVAILABLE FOR VIEWING IN THE PLANNING DIVISION ® VICINITY MAP ® LANDSCAPING PLAN ® IMPACT STUDY Z SITE PLAN fl WETLANDS REPORT Z TRAFFIC IMPACT STUDY Z NARRATIVE TREE PLAN ® OTHER: MISCELLANEOUS STAFF CONTACT: Morgan Tracy, Associate Planner (503) 639-4171, Ext. 2428 Asytopt AU- CITY OF TIGARD OREGON December 10, 2002 Fernando Gallarzo 600 Citadel Drive Los Angeles, CA 90040 RE: Completeness Review-Smart and Final, Cash and Carry, Case File No. SDR2002-00017 Dear Mr. Gallarzo: The City has completed its initial review of your application materials, and has determined that the necessary submittal items have been received. Although there is a narrative that has been included, it may be in your best interest to submit additional material responding to the issue raised at your neighborhood meeting and address the standards found in Chapter 18.705.030(K)(2). This is not required, but will enable staff to make a better determination regarding the feasibility of such a connection. Nevertheless, please submit 19 additional copies of your application materials (application form, written summary of proposal, narrative, neighborhood meeting minutes, impact study, and full set of plans (8.5"x11" is okay)). Once these sets have been received, Staff will deem your application submittal as complete and will begin the review process. The typical estimated time for rendering a decision from the date an application is deemed complete is 6-8 weeks. If you have any questions regarding your application, please don't hesitate to contact me at (503) 639-4171 ext. 2428. Sincerely, organ Tracy Associate Planner C: SDR2002-00017 Land Use File 11tig333\usr\depts\curpin\morgan\workspace\sdr\sdr2002-00017(cash and carry)\sdr2002-00017 complete.doc 13125 SW Hall Blvd., Tigard, OR 97223 (503) 639-4171 TDD (503)684-2772 saloN DNEflI4MOD lNiOI ,I,VDI'IddV ilild CITY OF TIGARD ,, PRE—APPLICATION CONFERENCE NOTES Ccm unit Development Shaping A Better Community (Pre-Application Meeting Notes are Valid for Six (6) Months) NON-RESIDENTIAL FFEXPivu DE 9/121bZ '1 TWA-HEAR s DC4." 1414.4 n1 t4V\ APPLICANT: tett-lank & d/ '-, 1 AGENT: Phone: ( Z� 2 70 1 Phone: ( ) PROPERTY LOCATION: ADDRESS/GENERAL LOCATION: 11716 Su/ ' c fluv y TAX MAP(S)/LOT #(S): IS/3g C 17 01000 NECESSARY APPLICATIONS: Kt jor 14o0F'catkovt (5P12) PROPOSAL DESCRIPTION: Conh,rrf 1vrntitift, 51a1e. In,f{11 Speeca( i clts`un itI tivrC. COMPREHENSIVE PLAN MAP DESIGNATION: 6erte-ati CoM,n aicr,( ZONING MAP DESIGNATION: C- G CITIZEN INVOLVEMENT TEAM (C.I.T.)AREA: Fact- ZONING DISTRICT DIMENSIONAL REQUIREMENTS Meter to Code Section 18. 5W l MINIMUM LOT SIZE: k sq. ft. Average Min. lot width: 9D ft. Max. building height: 1-t - ft. Setbacks: Front 151. ft. Side 'b? ft. Rear t9, ft. Corner — ft. from street. MAXIMUM SITE COVERAGE: ? % Minimum landscaped or natural vegetation area: %. 11 NEIGHBORHOOD MEETING (Refer to the Neighborhood Meeting Handout) THE APPLICANT SHALL NOTIFY ALL PROPERTY OWNERS WITHIN 500 FEET, THE MEMBERS OF ANY LAND USE SUBCOMMITTEE(S), AND THE CITY OF TIGARD PLANNING DIVISION of their proposal. A minimum of two (2) weeks between the mailing date and the meeting date is required. Please review the Land Use Notification handout concerning site posting and the meeting notice. Meeting is to be held prior to submitting your application or the application will not be accepted. NOTE: In order to also preliminarily address building code standards, a meeting with a Plans Examiner is encouraged prior to submittal of a land use application. CITY OF TIGARD Pre-Application Conference Notes Page 1 of 9 NON-Residential Application/Planning Division Section 0 NARRATIVE [Refer to Code Chapter 18.3901 The APPLICANT SHALL SUBMIT A NARRATIVE which provides findings based on the applicable approval standards. Failure to provide a narrative or adequately address criteria would be reason to consider an application incomplete and delay review of the proposal. The applicant should review the code for applicable criteria. Ni IMPACT STUDY [Refer to Code Sections 18.390.040 and 18.390.050] As a part of the APPLICATION SUBMITTAL REQUIREMENTS, applicants are required to INCLUDE IMPACT STUDY with their submittal package. The impact study shall quantify the effect of the development on public facilities and services. The study shall address, at a minimum, the transportation system, including bikeways, the drainage system, the parks system, the water system, the sewer system and the noise impacts of the development. For each public facility system and type of impact, the study shall propose improvements necessary to meet City standards, and to minimize the impact of the development on the public at large, public facilities systems, and affected private property users. In situations where the Community Development Code requires the dedication of real property interests, the applicant shall either specifically concur with the dedication requirement, or provide evidence which supports the conclusion that the real property dedication requirement is not roughly proportional to the projected impacts of the development. ]` ACCESS (Refer to Chapters 18.705 and 18.165) Minimum number of accesses: I Minimum access width: -.3 . Minimum pavement width: All driveways and parking areas, except for some fleet storage parking areas, must be paved. Drive-in use queuing areas: E WALKWAY REQUIREMENTS [Refer to Code Section 18.705.0301 WALKWAYS SHALL EXTEND FROM THE GROUND FLOOR ENTRANCES OR FROM THE GROUND FLOOR LANDING OF STAIRS, ramps, or elevators of all commercial, institutional, and industrial uses, to the streets which provide the required access and egress. Walkways shall provide convenient connections between buildings in multi-building commercial, institutional, and industrial complexes. Unless impractical, walkways should be constructed between a new development and neighboring developments. SPECIAL SETBACKS (Refer to Code Chapter 18.730) ➢ STREETS: feet from the centerline of ➢ LOWER INTENSITY ZONES: feet, along the site's boundary. ➢ FLAG LOT: 10-FOOT SIDE YARD SETBACK. ❑ SPECIAL BUILDING HEIGHT PROVISIONS (Refer to Code Section 18.730.010.BJ BUILDING HEIGHT EXCEPTIONS - Buildings located in a non-residential zone may be built to a height of 75 feet provided that: ➢ A maximum building floor area to site area ratio (FAR) of 1.5 to 1 will exist; ➢ All actual building setbacks will be at least half(1/2) of the building's height; and ➢ The structure will not abut a residential zoned district. [S BUFFERING AND SCREENING (Refer to Code Chapter 18.745) In order TO INCREASE PRIVACY AND TO EITHER REDUCE OR ELIMINATE ADVERSE NOISE OR VISUAL IMPACTS between adjacent developments, especially between different land uses, the City requires landscaped buffer areas along certain site perimeters. Required buffer areas are described by the Code in terms of width. Buffer areas must be occupied by a mixture of deciduous and evergreen trees and shrubs and must also achieve a balance between vertical and horizontal plantings. Site obscuring screens or fences may also be required; these are often advisable even if not required by the Code. The required buffer areas may only be occupied by vegetation, fences, utilities, and walkways. Additional information on required buffer area materials and sizes may be found in the Development Code. CITY OF TIGARD Pre-Application Conference Notes Page 2 of 9 NON-Residential Application/Planning Division Section The ESTIMATED REQUIRED BUFFER WIDTHS applicable to your proposal area are: it: -7.0 feet along north boundary.(w+az 514 4,1,ti� ,5) ----feet along east boundary. feet along south boundary. . - feet along west boundary. IN ADDITION, SIGHT OBSCURING SCREENING IS REQUIRED ALONG: El LANDSCAPING [Refer to Code Chapters 18.745,18.165 and 18.705) STREET TREES ARE REQUIRED FOR ALL DEVELOPMENTS FRONTING ON A PUBLIC OR PRIVATE STREET as well as driveways which are more than 100 feet in length. Street trees must be placed either within the public right-of-way or on private property within six (6) feet of the right-of- way boundary. Street trees must have a minimum caliper of at least two (2) inches when measured four (4) feet above grade. Street trees should be spaced 20 to 40 feet apart depending on the branching width of the proposed tree species at maturity. Further information on regulations affecting street trees may be obtained from the Planning Division. A MINIMUM OF ONE (1) TREE FOR EVERY SEVEN (7) PARKING SPACES MUST BE PLANTED in and around all parking areas in order to provide a vegetative canopy effect. Landscaped parking areas shall include special design features which effectively screen the parking lot areas from view. These design features may include the use of landscaped berms, decorative walls, and raised planters. ❑ RECYCLING [Refer to Code Chapter 18.7551 Applicant should CONTACT FRANCHISE HAULER FOR REVIEW AND APPROVAL OF SITE SERVICING COMPATIBILITY. Locating a trash/recycling enclosure within a clear vision area such as at the intersection of two (2) driveways within a parking lot is prohibited. Much of Tigard is within Pride Disposal's Service area. Lenny Hing is the contact person and can be reached at (503) 625-6177. IX PARKING [Refer to Code Section 18.165.0401 REQUIRED parking for this type of use: '3.1 ru-uh/i,0120 66F4- Parking SHOWN on preliminary plan(s): SECONDARY USE REQUIRED parking: Parking SHOWN on preliminary plan(s): NO MORE THAN 50% OF REQUIRED SPACES MAY BE DESIGNATED AND/OR DIMENSIONED AS COMPACT SPACES. PARKING STALLS shall be dimensioned as follows: Y Standard parking space dimensions: 8 feet, 6 inches x 18 feet, 6 inches. 5- Compact parking space dimensions: 7 feet, 6 inches x 16 feet, 6 inches. Note: Parking space width includes the width of a stripe that separates the parking space from an adjoining space. Note: A maximum of three (3)feet of the vehicle overhang area in front of a wheel stop or curb can be included as part of required parking space depth. This area cannot be included as landscaping for meeting the minimum percentage requirements. HANDICAPPED PARKING: ;- All parking areas shall PROVIDE APPROPRIATELY LOCATED AND DIMENSIONED DISABLED PERSON PARKING spaces. The minimum number of disabled person parking spaces to be provided, as well as the parking stall dimensions, are mandated by the Americans with Disabilities Act (ADA). A handout is available upon request. A handicapped parking space symbol shall be painted on the parking space surface and an appropriate sign shall be posted. `r BICYCLE RACKS ARE REQUIRED FOR MULTI-FAMILY, COMMERCIAL AND INDUSTRIAL DEVELOPMENTS. Bicycle racks shall be located in areas protected from automobile traffic and in convenient locations. (2' LOADING AREA REQUIREMENTS [Refer to Code Section 18365.0801 Every COMMERCIAL OR INDUSTRIAL BUILDING IN EXCESS OF 10,000 SQUARE FEET shall be provided with a loading space. The space size and location shall be as approved by the City Engineer. CITY OF TIGARD Pre-Application Conference Notes Page 3 of 9 NON-Residential Application/Planning Division Section • El BICYCLE RACKS (Refer to Code Section 18.7651 BICYCLE RACKS are required FOR MULTI-FAMILY, COMMERCIAL AND INDUSTRIAL DEVELOPMENTS. Bicycle racks shall be located in areas protected from automobile traffic and in convenient locations. spa /f,0001 (7 SENSITIVE LANDS (Refer to Code Chapter 18.1151 The Code provides REGULATIONS FOR LANDS WHICH ARE POTENTIALLY UNSUITABLE FOR DEVELOPMENT DUE TO AREAS WITHIN THE 100-YEAR FLOODPLAIN, NATURAL DRAINAGEWAYS, WETLAND AREAS, ON SLOPES IN EXCESS OF 25 PERCENT, OR ON UNSTABLE GROUND. Staff will attempt to preliminary identify sensitive lands areas at the pre- application conference based on available information. HOWEVER, the responsibility to precisely identify sensitive land areas, and their boundaries, is the responsibility of the applicant. Areas meeting the definitions of sensitive lands must be clearly indicated on plans submitted with the development application. Chapter 18.775 also provides regulations for the use, protection, or modification of sensitive lands areas. RESIDENTIAL DEVELOPMENT IS PROHIBITED WITHIN FLOODPLAINS. STEEP SLOPES (Refer to Code Section 18.115.080.C1 When STEEP SLOPES exist, prior to issuance of a final order, a geotechnical report must be submitted which addresses the approval standards of the Tigard Community Development Code Section 18.775.080.C. The report shall be based upon field exploration and investigation and shall include specific recommendations for achieving the requirements of Section 18.775.080.C. CLEANWATER SERVICES(CWS)BUFFER STANDARDS (Refer to R a 0 96-44/USA Regulations-Chapter 3) LAND DEVELOPMENT ADJACENT TO SENSITIVE AREAS shall preserve and maintain or create a vegetated corridor for a buffer wide enough to protect the water quality functioning of the sensitive area. f • Design Criteria: Ro rev The VEGETATED CORRIDOR WIDTH is dependent on the sensitive area. The following table identifies the required widths: TABLE 3.1 VEGETATED CORRIDOR WIDTHS SOURCE: CWS DESIGN AND CONSTRUCTION STANDARDS MANUAL/RESOLUTION &ORDER 96-44 SENSITIVE AREA DEFINITION SLOPE ADJACENT WIDTH OF VEGETATED TO SENSITIVE AREA4 CORRIDOR PER SIDE5 • Streams with intermittent flow draining: <25% 15 feet 10 to <50 acres ► >50 to <100 acres 25 feet • Existing or created wetlands <0.5 acre 25 feet • Existing or created wetlands >0.5 acre <25% 50 feet • Rivers, streams, and springs with year-round flow ♦ Streams with intermittent flow draining >100 acres ♦ Natural lakes and ponds ♦ Streams with intermittent flow draining: >25% 1 10 to <50 acres 30 feet >50 to <100 acres 50 feet • Existing or created wetlands >25% Variable from 50-200 feet. Measure • Rivers, streams, and springs with year-round flow in 25-foot increments from the starting • Streams with intermittent flow draining >100 acres point to the top of ravine(break in • Natural lakes and ponds <25%slope), add 35 feet past the top of ravine' Starting point for measurement = edge of the defined channel (bankful flow) for streams/rivers, delineated wetland boundary, delineated spring boundary, and/or average high water for lakes or ponds,whichever offers greatest resource protection. Intermittent springs, located a minimum of 15 feet within the river/stream or wetland vegetated corridor,shall not serve as a starting point for measurement. 5Vegetated corridor averaging or reduction is allowed only when the vegetated corridor is certified to be in a marginal or degraded condition. 6The vegetated corridor extends 35 feet from the top of the ravine and sets the outer boundary of the vegetated corridor. The 35 feet may be reduced to 15 feet,if a stamped geotechnical report confirms slope stability shall be maintained with the reduced setback from the top of ravine. CITY OF TIGARD Pre-Application Conference Notes Page 4 of 9 NON-Residential Apprication/Pianning Division Section • Restrictions in the Vegetate Corridor: NO structures, development, construction activities, gardens, lawns, application of chemicals, dumping of any materials of any kind, or other activities shall be permitted which otherwise detract from the water quality protection provided by the vegetated corridor, except as provided for in the CWS Design and Construction Standards. Location of Vegetated Corridor: IN ANY RESIDENTIAL DEVELOPMENT WHICH CREATES MULTIPLE PARCELS or lots intended for separate ownership, such as a subdivision, the vegetated corridor shall be contained in a separate tract, and shall not be a part of any parcel to be used for the construction of a dwelling unit. CWS Service Provider Letter: PRIOR TO SUBMITTAL of any land use applications, the applicant must obtain a CWS Service Provider Letter which will outline the conditions necessary to comply with the R&O 96-44 sensitive area requirements. If there are no sensitive areas, CWS must still issue a letter stating a CWS Service Provider Letter is not required. at SIGNS (Refer to Code Chapter 183801 SIGN PERMITS MUST BE OBTAINED PRIOR TO INSTALLATION OF ANY SIGN in the City of Tigard. A "Guidelines for Sign Permits" handout is available upon request. Additional sign area or height beyond Code standards may be permitted if the sign proposal is reviewed as part of a development review application. Alternatively, a Sign Code Exception application may be filed for Director's review. TREE REMOVAL PLAN REQUIREMENTS (Refer to Code Section 18.190.030.C.1 A TREE PLAN FOR THE PLANTING, REMOVAL AND PROTECTION OF TREES prepared by a certified arborist shall be provided for any lot, parcel or combination of lots or parcels for which a development application for a subdivision, partition, site development review, planned development, or conditional use is filed. Protection is preferred over removal where possible. THE TREE PLAN SHALL INCLUDE the following: ➢ Identification of the location, size and species of all existing trees including trees designated as significant by the City; ➢ Identification of a program to save existing trees or mitigate tree removal over 12 inches in caliper. Mitigation must follow the replacement guidelines of Section 18.790.060.D according to the following standards and shall be exclusive of trees required by other development code provisions for landscaping, streets and parking lots: Retainage of less than 25% of existing trees over 12 inches in caliper requires a mitigation program according to Section 18.150.070.D. of no net loss of trees; Retainage of from 25 to 50% of existing trees over 12 inches in caliper requires that two- thirds of the trees to be removed be mitigated according to Section 18.790.060.D.; Retainage of from 50 to 75% of existing trees over 12 inches in caliper requires that 50% of the trees to be removed be mitigated according to Section 18.790.060.D.; Retainage of 75% or greater of existing trees over 12 inches in caliper requires no mitigation; ➢ Identification of all trees which are proposed to be removed; and ➢ A protection program defining standards and methods that will be used by the applicant to protect trees during and after construction. TREES REMOVED WITHIN THE PERIOD OF ONE (1) YEAR PRIOR TO A DEVELOPMENT APPLICATION LISTED ABOVE will be inventoried as part of the tree plan above and will be replaced according to Section 18.790.060.D. MITIGATION [Refer to Code Section 18390.060.11 REPLACEMENT OF A TREE shall take place according to the following guidelines: ➢ A replacement tree shall be a substantially similar species considering site characteristics. ➢ If a replacement tree of the species of the tree removed or damaged is not reasonably available, the Director may allow replacement with a different species of equivalent natural resource value. CITY OF TIGARD Pre-Application Conference Notes Page 5 of 9 NON-Residential Application/Planning Division Section ➢ If a replacement tree of the size cut is not reasonably available on the local market or would not be viable, the Director shall require replacement with more than one tree in accordance with the following formula: The number of replacement trees required shall be determined by dividing the estimated caliper size of the tree removed or damaged, by the caliper size of the largest reasonably available replacement trees. If this number of trees cannot be viably located on the subject property, the Director may require one (1) or more replacement trees to be planted on other property within the city, either public property or, with the consent of the owner, private property. ➢ The planting of a replacement tree shall take place in a manner reasonably calculated to allow growth to maturity. IN LIEU OF TREE REPLACEMENT under Subsection D of this section, a party may, with the consent of the Director, elect to compensate the City for its costs in performing such tree replacement. " CLEAR VISION AREA (Refer to Code Chapter 18.7951 The City requires that CLEAR VISION AREAS BE MAINTAINED BETWEEN THREE (3) AND EIGHT (8) FEET IN HEIGHT at road/driveway, road/railroad, and road/road intersections. The size of the required clear vision area depends upon the abutting street's functional classification and any existing obstructions within the clear vision area. 1 1 WATER RESOURCES OVERLAY DISTRICT (Refer to Code Section 18.797.0301 The WATER RESOURCES (WR) OVERLAY DISTRICT implements the policies of the Tigard Comprehensive Plan and is intended to resolve conflicts between development and conservation of significant wetlands, streams and riparian corridors identified in the City of Tigard Local Wetlands Inventory. Specifically, this chapter allows reasonable economic use of property while establishing clear and objective standards to: protect significant wetlands and streams; limit development in designated riparian corridors; maintain and enhance water quality; maximize flood storage capacity; preserve native plant cover; minimize streambank erosion; maintain and enhance fish and wildlife habitats; and conserve scenic, recreational and educational values of water resource areas. Safe Harbor: The WR OVERLAY DISTRICT ALSO MEETS THE REQUIREMENTS OF STATEWIDE PLANNING GOAL 5 (Natural Resources) and the "safe harbor" provisions of the Goal 5 administrative rule (OAR 660, Division 23). These provisions require that "significant" wetlands and riparian corridors be mapped and protected. The Tualatin River, which is also a "fish-bearing stream," has an average annual flow of more than 1000 cfs. Major Streams: Streams which are mapped as "FISH-BEARING STREAMS" by the Oregon Department of Forestry and have an average annual flow less than 1000 cubic feet per second (cfs). ➢ Major streams in Tigard include FANNO CREEK, ASH CREEK (EXCEPT THE NORTH FORK AND OTHER TRIBUTARY CREEKS) AND BALL CREEK. Minor Streams: Streams which are NOT "FISH-BEARING STREAMS" according to Oregon Department of Forestry maps . Minor streams in Tigard include Summer Creek, Derry Dell Creek, Red Rock Creek, North Fork of Ash Creek and certain short tributaries of the Tualatin River. Riparian Setback Area: This AREA IS MEASURED HORIZONTALLY FROM AND PARALLEL TO MAJOR STREAM OR TUALATIN RIVER TOP-OF-BANKS, OR THE EDGE OF AN ASSOCIATED WETLAND, whichever is greater. The riparian setback is the same as the "riparian corridor boundary" in OAR 660-23- 090(1)(d). CITY OF TIGARD Pre-Application Conference Notes Page 6 of 9 NON-Residential Application/Planning Division Section D The standard TUALATIN RIVER RIPARIAN SETBACK IS 75 FEET, unless modified in accordance with this chapter. • The MAJOR STREAMS RIPARIAN SETBACK IS 50 FEET, unless modified in accordance with this chapter. Y ISOLATED WETLANDS AND MINOR STREAMS (including adjacent wetlands) have no riparian setback; however, a 25-foot "water quality buffer" is required under Cleanwater Services (CWS) standards adopted and administered by the City of Tigard. I I RIPARIAN SETBACK REDUCTIONS (Refer to Code Section 18.797100) The DIRECTOR MAY APPROVE A SITE-SPECIFIC REDUCTION OF THE TUALATIN RIVER OR ANY MAJOR STREAM RIPARIAN SETBACK BY AS MUCH AS 50% to allow the placement of structures or impervious surfaces otherwise prohibited by this chapter, provided that equal or better protection for identified major stream resources is ensured through streambank restoration and/or enhancement of riparian vegetation in preserved portions of the riparian setback area. Eligibility for Riparian Setback in Disturbed Areas. TO BE ELIGIBLE FOR A RIPARIAN SETBACK REDUCTION, the applicant must demonstrate that the riparian corridor was substantially disturbed at the time this regulation was adopted. This determination must be based on the Vegetation Study required by Section 18.797.100 that demonstrates all of the following: D Native plant species currently cover less than 80% of the on-site riparian corridor area; D The tree canopy currently covers less than 50% of the on-site riparian corridor and healthy trees have not been removed from the on-site riparian setback area for the last five years; D That vegetation was not removed contrary to the provisions of Section 18.797.100 regulating removal of native plant species; D That there will be no infringement into the 100-year floodplain; and D The average slope of the riparian area is not greater than 20%. (l ADDITIONAL LOT DIMENSIONAL REQUIREMENTS (Refer to Code Section 18.810.0601 MINIMUM LOT FRONTAGE: 25 feet unless lot is created through the minor land partition process. Lots created as part of a partition must have a minimum of 15 feet of frontage or have a minimum 15-foot wide access easement. The DEPTH OF ALL LOTS SHALL NOT EXCEED 21/2 TIMES THE AVERAGE WIDTH, unless the parcel is less than 11/2 times the minimum lot size of the applicable zoning district. CODE CHAPTERS / - 18.330(Conditional Use) 18.620(Tigard Triangle Design Standards) ✓ 18.765(Off-Street Parking/Loading Requirements) - 18.340(Directors Interpretation) 18.630(Washington Square Regional Center) 18.775(Sensitive Lands Review) 18.350(Planned Development) `/ 18.705(Access/Egress/Circulation) _ 18.780(Signs) 18.360(Site Development Review) 18.710(Accessory Residential Units) - 18.785(Temporary Use Permits) _ 18.370(variances/Adjustments) 18.715(Density Computations) 18.790(Tree Removal) 18.380(Zoning Map/Text Amendments) 18.720(Design Compatibility Standards) ! 18.795(Visual Clearance Areas) _./18.385(Miscellaneous Permits) 18.725(Environmental Performance Standards) _ 18.797(Water Resources(WR)Overlay District) " 18.390(Decision Making Procedures/Impact Study) 18.730(Exceptions To Development Standards) 18.798(Wireless Communication Facilities) 18.410(Lot Line Adjustments) 18.740(Historic Overlay) 7 18.810(Street&Utility Improvement Standards) 18.420(Land Partitions) 18.742(Home Occupation Permits) 18.430(Subdivisions) `/ 18.745(Landscaping&Screening Standards) 18.510(Residential Zoning Districts) 18.750(Manufactured/Mobil Home Regulations) V 18.520(Commercial Zoning Districts) 18.755(Mixed Solid Waste/Recycling Storage) 18.530(Industrial Zoning Districts) 18.760(Nonconforming Situations) CITY OF TIGARD Pre-Application Conference Notes Page 7 of 9 NON-Residential Application/Planning Division Section ADDITIONAL CONCERNS OR COMMENTS: i e,G. of Lticti ,7 tric�,Crl�t�htcyLIG ict.C . Sears/ tiety 4,4>✓irkt45. 54-y9?/54- u (p g_-t1i .,a4,1 i o�, 'r4�a�y r'-yh, ( �y jr s►4r e'1 c ei ymez - '� e Et, l A�,vlt ttoIA a / /Agel&raf`/teh CPiI appl«cI¢ 4/(4411 1-0 pro ) w� yena..t.�- improve e.,1l5 - ?pt., a L jJ l�t�rr►tless (a5 alt s L✓sceii In 4. b-o . ot.�upa.tc y ,,r tt na SDP u.ppra t.l • PROCEDURE Administrative Staff Review. Public hearing before the Land Use Hearings Officer. Public hearing before the Planning Commission. Public hearing before the Planning Commission with the Commission making a recommendation on the proposal to the City Council. An additional public hearing shall be held by the City Council. APPLICATION SUBMITTAL PROCESS All APPLICATIONS MUST BE ACCEPTED BY A PLANNING DIVISION STAFF MEMBER of the Community Development Department at Tigard City Hall offices. PLEASE NOTE: Applications submitted by mail or dropped off at the counter without Planning Division acceptance may be returned. The Planning counter closes at 4:00 PM. Maps submitted with an application shall be folded IN ADVANCE to 8.5 by 11 inches. One (1), 81/2' x 11" map of a proposed project should be submitted for attachment to the staff report or administrative decision. Application with unfolded maps shall not be accepted. The Planning Division and Engineering Department will perform a preliminary review of the application and will determine whether an application is complete within 30 days of the counter submittal. Staff will notify the applicant if additional information or additional copies of the submitted materials are required. • CITY OF TIGARD Pre-Application Conference Notes Page 8 of 9 NON-Residential Application/Planning Division Socdon The administrative decision or public hearing will typically occur approximately 45 to 60 days after an application is accepted as being complete by the Planning Division. Applications involving difficult or protracted issues or requiring review by other jurisdictions may take additional time to review. Written recommendations from the Planning staff are issued seven (7) days prior to the public hearing. A 10-day public appeal, period folloyrs all land use decisions. An appeal on this matter would be heard by the Tigard f-Q,tirl,y 01-1-€ . A basic flow chart which illustrates the review process is available from the Planning Division upon request. Land use applications requiring a public hearing must have notice posted on-site by the applicant no less than 10 days prior to the public hearing. This PRE-APPLICATION CONFERENCE AND THE NOTES OF THE CONFERENCE ARE INTENDED TO INFORM the prospective applicant of the primary Community Development Code requirements applicable to the potential development of a particular site and to allow the City staff and prospective applicant to discuss the opportunities and constraints affecting development of the site. BUILDING PERMITS PLANS FOR BUILDING AND OTHER RELATED PERMITS WILL NOT BE ACCEPTED FOR REVIEW UNTIL A LAND USE APPROVAL HAS BEEN ISSUED. Final inspection approvals by the Building Division will not be granted until there is compliance with all conditions of development approval. These pre-application notes do not include comments from the Building Division. For proposed buildings or modifications to existing buildings, it is recommended to contact a Building Division Plans Examiner to determine if there are building code issues that would prevent the structure from being constructed, as proposed. Additionally, with regard to Subdivisions and Minor Land Partitions where any structure to be demolished has system development charge (SDC) credits and the underlying parcel for that structure will be eliminated when the new plat is recorded, the City's policy is to apply those system development credits to the first building permit issued in the development (UNLESS OTHERWISE DIRECTED BY THE DEVELOPER AT THE TIME IN WHICH THE DEMOLITION PERMIT IS OBTAINED). PLEASE NOTE: The conference and notes cannot cover all Code requirements and aspects related to site planning that should apply to the development of your site plan. Failure of the staff to provide information required by the Code shall not constitute a waiver of the applicable standards or requirements. It is recommended thai a prospective applicant either obtain and read the Community Development Code or ask any questions of City staffprelative to Code requirements prior to submitting an application. AN ADDITIONAL PRE-APPLICATION FEE AND CONFERENCE WILL BE REQUIRED IF AN APPLICATION PERTAINING TO THIS PRE-APPLICATION CONFERENCE IS SUBMITTED AFTER A PERIOD OF MORE THAN SIX (6) MONTHS FOLLOWING THIS CONFERENCE (unless deemed as unnecessary by the Planning Division). PREPARED BY: 1"'v('guy) Tracy CITY OF TIGARD PLANNING IDIVISION - STAFF PERSON HOLDING PRE-APP. MEETING PHONE: (503) 639-4171 FAX: (503) 684-1297 E-MAIL jstafrs first name)@ei.tigard.or.us TITLE 18(CITY OF TIGARD'S COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT CODE)INTERNET ADDRESS: www.ci.tigard.or.us H:1pattylmasters\Pre-App Notes Commerciai.doc Updated: 1-Nov-2001 (Engineering section:preapp.eng) CITY OF TIGARD Pre-Application Conference Notes Page 9 of 9 NON-Residential Application/Planning Division Section CITY OF TIGARD LAND USE APPLICATION CHECKLIST Please read this form carefully in conjunction with the notes provided to you at the pre-application conference. This checklist identifies what is required for submittal of a complete land use application. Once an application is deemed complete by Community Development staff, a decision may be issued within 6-8 weeks. If you have additional questions after reviewing all of the information provided to you, please contact the staff person named below at the City of Tigard Planning Division, 503639.4171. Staff: filor y(1-0 1r ( Date: 9 f I Zlcz_ 1. BASIC INFORMATION Please refer to the"Land use applications basic submittal requirements"checklist for the basic submittal requirements. 2. SPECIAL STUDIES AND REPORTS Because of the nature of your project and/or the site you propose to develop, THE FOLLOWING ADDITIONAL STUDIES WILL BE REQUIRED. These studies must be prepared by certified professionals with experience in the appropriate field: ❑ Arborist Report/Tree Assessment ❑ Local Streets Traffic Study ❑ Wetlands/Stream Corridor Delineation and Report ❑ Habitat Area Evaluation ❑ Geotechnical Report ❑ Geotechnical Report must address liquefaction potential and soil bearing capacity ❑ Other 3. PREPARING PLANS AND MAPS Plans and maps should be prepared at an engineering scale (1" = 10/20/50/100/200') and include a north arrow, legend and date. The same scale should be used for all your plans. Where possible the City prefers the use of a scale that allows a site plan or subdivision plat to be shown on a single sheet. Architectural drawings may be prepared at an architectural scale. One copy of each plan must be submitted in photo-ready 81/2 x 11 format. THE FOLLOWING IS A LIST OF REQUIRED INFORMATION FOR EACH TYPE OF PLAN (If the plans you submit do not include all of the information requested because you feel it is not applicable, please indicate this and provide a brief explanation). Vicinity Map Showing the location of the site in relation to: • Adjacent properties ❑ • Surrounding street system including nearby intersections ❑ • Pedestrian ways and bikeways ❑ • Transit stops ❑ • Utility access ❑ City of Tigard Land Use Application Checklist Page 1 of 4 h:lpatty\masterslcheddist_doc (UPDATED: 26-Jun-02) Existing Conditions Map • Parcel boundaries, dimensions and gross area ❑ • Contour lines (2' intervals for 0-10% slopes or 5'for slopes >10%) ❑ • Drainage patterns and courses on the site and on adjacent lands ❑ • Potential natural hazard areas including: • Floodplain areas ❑ • Areas having a high seasonal water table within 24"of the surface for three or more weeks of the year El • Slopes in excess of 25% ❑ • Unstable ground ❑ • Areas with severe soil erosion potential ❑ • Areas having severely weak foundation soils ❑ • Locations of resource areas including: • Wildlife habitat areas identified in the Comprehensive Plan ❑ • Wetlands ❑ • Other site features: • Rock outcroppings ❑ • Trees with >_6"caliper measured 4'from ground level ❑ • Location and type of noise sources ❑ • Locations of existing structures and their uses ❑ • Locations of existing utilities and easements ❑ • Locations of existing dedicated right-of-ways ❑ -> Locations of driveways on adjacent properties and across the street ❑ Subdivision Preliminary Plat Map • The p osed name of the subdivision CI • Vicinity ap showing property's relationship to arterial and collector streets ❑ Names, a resses and telephone numbers of the owner, developer,engineer surveyor and designer(as applicable) El • Scale, north'errow and date ❑ • Boundary line\of tract to be subdivided Names of adjacent subdivisions or names of recorded owners of adjoining parcels of un-subdivided land ❑ Contour lines rela`\ed to a City-established benchmark at 2' intervals for 0-10% grades and 5' intervals for grades greater tha 10% ❑ The purpose, locatio type and size of all of the following (within and adjacent to the proposed subdivision): • Public and private 'ght-of-ways and easements ❑ • Public and private sanitary and storm sewer lines ❑ • Domestic water mains'including fire hydrants ❑ • Major power telephone tr'ansmission lines (50,000 volts or greater) ❑ • Watercourses ❑ • Deed reservations for parks,`open spaces, pathways and other land encumbrances ❑ • The location of all trees with a diameter 6 inches or greater measured at 4 feet above ground level El • The location of all structures and the present uses of the structures, and a statement of which structures are to remain after platting ❑ • Supplemental information including: • Proposed deed restrictions (if any) ❑ • A proposed plan for provision of subdivisio improvements ❑ Existing natural features including rock outcroppi s,wetlands and marsh areas • The proposed lot configurations, lot sizes and dimeYlsions, and lot numbers. Where lots are to be used for purposes other than residential, it shall be indicated upon such lots ❑ • If any of the foregoing information cannot practicably be shown on the preliminary plat, it shall be incorporated into a narrative and submitted with the application materials ❑ City of Tigard Land Use Application Checklist Page 2 of 4 h:\patty\masters\checklist.doc (UPDATED: 26-Jun-02) Preliminary Partition/Lot Line Adjustment Plan The owner of the subject parcel ❑ The owner's authorized agent ❑ The map scale, hQrth arrow and date ❑ Proposed property flns ❑ Description of parcel locatton and boundaries ❑ Contour lines (2' intervals fob lopes 0-10%or 5'for slopes >10%) ❑ Location, width and names of st ts, easements and other public ways within and adjacent to the parcel ❑ Location of all permanent buildings and within 25'of all property lines ❑ Location and width of all water courses ❑ Location of any trees with 6"or greater calip t 4'above ground level ❑ All slopes greater than 25% ❑ Location of existing and proposed utilities and utility a ments ❑ Any applicable deed restrictions ❑ Evidence that land partition will not preclude efficient future land division where applicable ❑ Future street extension plan showing existing and potential street connections ❑ Site Development Plan The proposed site and surrounding properties ❑ Contour line intervals ❑ The locations, dimensions and proposed names of the following: • Existing and platted streets and other public ways ❑ ♦ Easements on the site and on adjoining properties ❑ • Proposed streets or other public ways and easements on the site ❑ • Alternative routes of dead-end or proposed streets that require future extensions ❑ The locations and dimensions of the following: • Entrances and exits on the site ❑ • Parking and circulation areas ❑ • Loading and service areas ❑ • Pedestrian and bicycle circulation El • Outdoor common areas ❑ • Above ground utilities ❑ • Trash and recyclable material areas ❑ The locations, dimensions and setback distances of the following: ♦ Existing permanent structures, improvements, utilities and easements which are located on the site and on adjacent property within 25'of the site ❑ ♦ Proposed structures, improvements, utilities and easements on the site ❑ • Sanitary sewer facilities ❑ • Existing or proposed sewer reimbursement agreements ❑ • Storm drainage facilities and analysis of downstream conditions ❑ Locations and type(s)of outdoor lighting considering crime prevention techniques ❑ > The locations of the following: • All areas to be landscaped ❑ • Mailboxes ❑ ♦ Structures and their orientation ❑ City of Tigard Land Use Application Checklist Page 3 of 4 h:\patty\masters\checklist.doc (UPDATED: 26-Jun-02) Landscape Plan Location of trees to be removed ❑ Location, size and species of existing plant materials ❑ General location,size and species of proposed plan materials ❑ Landscape narrative that addresses: • Soil conditions and how plant selections were derived for them ❑ • Plans for soil treatment such as stockpiling the top soil ❑ • Erosion control measures that will be used ❑ Location and description of the irrigation system where applicable ❑ Location and size of fences, buffer areas and screening ❑ Location of terraces,decks, shelters, play areas,and common open spaces ❑ Public Improv ents/Streets Plan Proposed right-of-w ovations and widths ❑ A scaled cross-section o I proposed streets plus any reserve strips ❑ Approximate centerline profit showing the finished grade of all streets including street extensions for a reasonable distance beyond the ' its of the proposed subdivision ❑ Grading/E Sion Control Plan The locations a extent to which grading will take place ❑ Existing and propos contour lines ❑ Slope ratios ❑ Utilities Pla Approximate pla nd profiles of proposed sanitary and storm sewers with grades and pipe sizes indicated on the plans ❑ Plan of the proposed w r distribution system, showing pipe sizes and the locations of valves and meter sizes ❑ Fire hydrants (existing an roposed) ❑ Proposed fire protection syst ❑ Preliminary Storm ► ainage Plan The location of all areas •eject to inundation or storm water overflow ❑ Location,width and direction flow of all water courses and drainageways El Location and estimated size of s s posed storm drainage lines ❑ Where applicable, location and est •'ated size and dimensions of proposed water quality/detention facility ❑ Tree Preservation/Mi i ation Plan Identification of the location, ' e and species of all existing trees ❑ Program to save existing trees o itigate tree removal (Section 18.790.030) ❑ A protection program defining stan ds and methods to be used during and after construction ❑ Architectural Drawings Floor plans indicating the square footage of all structures and their proposed use ❑ Elevation drawings for each elevation of the structure ❑ Sign Drawings Specify proposed location, size and height ❑ City of Tigard Land Use Application Checklist Page 4 of 4 h:lpatty\masters\cheddist_doc (UPDATED: 26-Jun-02) PRE-AP CONFERENCE NOTE „: . > ENGINEERING SECTION � • , Lyon : - , Development 1 Shaping A Better Community PUBLIC FACILITIES Tax Map[s]: 15136CD Tax LotEsi: 1000 Use Type: Discount Store The extent of necessary public improvements and dedications which shall be required of the applicant will be recommended by City staff and subject to approval by the appropriate authority. There will be no final recommendation to the decision making authority on behalf of the City staff until all concerned commenting agencies, City staff and the public have had an opportunity to review and comment on the application. The following comments are a projection of public improvement related requirements that may be required as a condition of development approval for your proposed project. Right-of-way dedication: The City of Tigard requires that land area be dedicated to the public: (1.) To increase abutting public rights-of-way to the ultimate functional street classification right-of-way width as specified by the Community Development Code; or (2.) For the creation of new streets. Approval of a development application for this site will require right-of-way dedication for: 1 I SW to feet (l SW to feet SW to feet SW to feet Street improvements: ® Partial street improvements will be necessary along SW Pacific Highway, to include: 1 feet of pavement n concrete curb (l storm sewers and other underground utilities -foot concrete sidewalk street trees street signs, traffic control devices, streetlights and a two-year streetlight fee. CITY OF TIGARD Pre-Application Conference Notes Pagel of 6 Engineering Department Section Z Other: ODOT n have some requirements for this r pct. Contact Christian Snuffin at ODOT Region 1, at 5uJ/731-8202. I I street improvements will be necessary along SW , to include: feet of pavement [ I concrete curb [ storm sewers and other underground utilities [ -foot concrete sidewalk [ I street trees street signs, traffic control devices, streetlights and a two-year streetlight fee. Other: street improvements will be necessary along SW , to include: I I feet of pavement I I concrete curb storm sewers and other underground utilities -foot concrete sidewalk I I street trees ❑ street signs, traffic control devices, streetlights and a two-year streetlight fee. Other: I I street improvements will be necessary along SW , to include: feet of pavement I I concrete curb storm sewers and other underground utilities I I -foot concrete sidewalk street trees [ I street signs, traffic control devices, streetlights and a two-year streetlight fee. Other: I I street improvements will be necessary along SW , to include: feet of pavement I I concrete curb I I storm sewers and other underground utilities CITY OF TIGARD Pre-Application Conference Notes Page 2 of 6 Engineering Department Section I I -foot concr sidewalk street trees I I street signs, traffic control devices, streetlights and a two-year streetlight fee. I I Other: Agreement for Future Street Improvements: In some cases, where street improvements or other necessary public improvements are not currently practical, the improvements may be deferred. In such cases, a condition of development approval may be specified which requires the property owner(s) to provide a future improvement guarantee. The City Engineer will determine the form of this guarantee. The following street improvements may be eligible for such a future improvement guarantee: (1.) (2.) Overhead Utility Lines: Section 18.810.120 of the Tigard Municipal Code (TMC) requires all overhead utility lines adjacent to a development to be placed underground or, at the election of the developer, a fee in-lieu of undergrounding can be paid. This requirement is valid even if the utility lines are on the opposite side of the street from the site. If the fee in-lieu is proposed, it is equal to $ 27.50 per lineal foot of street frontage that contains the overhead lines. There are existing overhead utility lines which run adjacent to this site along SW Prior to , the applicant shall either place these utilities underground, or pay the fee in- lieu described above. Sanitary Sewers: The nearest sanitary sewer line to this property is a(n) inch line which is located . The proposed development must be connected to a public sanitary sewer. It is the developer's responsibility to The site is already served by public sewer. Water Supply: The Tualatin Valley Water District (Phone:(503) 642-1511) provides public water service in the area of this site. This service provider should be contacted for information regarding water supply for your proposed development. Fire Protection: Tualatin Valley Fire and Rescue District (South Division) [Contact: Eric McMullen, (503) 612-7010] provides fire protection services within the City of Tigard. The District should be contacted for CITY OF TIGARD Pre-Application Conference Notes Page 3 of 6 Engineering Department Section information regarding the ,quacy of circulation systems, th eed for fire hydrants, or other questions related to fire prot �tion. Storm Sewer Improvements: All proposed development within the City shall be designed such that storm water runoff is conveyed to an approved public drainage system. The applicant will be required to submit a proposed storm drainage plan for the site, and may be required to prepare a sub-basin drainage analysis to ensure that the proposed system will accommodate runoff from upstream properties when fully developed. It does not appear that the impervious area of the site will be increased. Storm Water Quality: The City has agreed to enforce Surface Water Management (SWM) regulations established by the Unified Sewerage Agency (USA) (Resolution and Order No. 00-7) which requires the construction of on-site water quality facilities. The facilities shall be designed to remove 65 percent of the phosphorus contained in 100 percent of the storm water runoff generated from newly created impervious surfaces. The resolution contains a provision that would allow an applicant to pay a fee in-lieu of constructing an on-site facility provided specific criteria are met. The City will use discretion in determining whether or not the fee in-lieu will be offered. If the fee is allowed, it will be based upon the amount of new impervious surfaces created; for every 2,640 square feet, or portion thereof, the fee shall be $210. Preliminary sizing calculations for any proposed water quality facility shall be submitted with the development application. It is anticipated that this project will require: U Construction of an on-site water quality facility. ® Payment of the fee in-lieu. This will only apply if the impervious area of the site increases. Other Comments: All proposed sanitary sewer and storm drainage systems shall be designed such that City maintenance vehicles will have unobstructed access to critical manholes in the systems. Maintenance access roadways may be required if existing or proposed facilities are not otherwise readily accessible. 1) A traffic impact report may be required because of the increase in trip generation for a discount store versus a furnature store. ODOT would be the agency to make that determination. Contact Christian Snuffin at ODOT Region 1, at 503/731-8202. TRAFFIC IMPACT FEES In 1990, Washington County adopted a county-wide Traffic Impact Fee (TIF) ordinance. The Traffic Impact Fee program collects fees from new development based on the development's projected impact upon the City's transportation system. The applicant shall be required to pay a fee based upon CITY OF TIGARD Pre-Application Conference Notes Page 4 of 6 Engineering Department Section the number of trips which a )rojected to result from the propos ievelopment. The calculation of the TIF is based on the proposed use of the land, the size of the project, and a general use based fee category. The TIF shall be calculated at the time of building permit issuance. In limited circumstances, payment of the TIF may be allowed to be deferred until the issuance of an occupancy permit. Deferral of the payment until occupancy is permissible only when the TIF is greater than $5,000.00. Pay TIF for the change in use. PERMITS Public Facility Improvement (PFI) Permit: Any work within a public right-of-way in the City of Tigard requires a PFI permit from the Engineering Department. A PFI permit application is available at the Planning/Engineering counter in City Hall. For more extensive work such as street widening improvements, main utility line extensions or subdivision infrastructure, plans prepared by a registered professional engineer must be submitted for review and approval. The Engineering Department fee structure for this permit is considered a cost recovery system. A deposit is collected with the application, and the City will track its costs throughout the life of the permit, and will either refund any remaining portion of the deposit, or invoice the Permittee in cases where City costs exceeds the deposit amount. The Permittee will also be required to post a performance bond, or other such suitable security. Where professional engineered plans are required, the Permittee must execute a Developer/Engineer Agreement, which will obligate the design engineer to perform the primary inspection of the public improvement construction work. The PFI permit fee structure is as follows: NOTE: If an PFI Permit is required,the applicant must obtain that permit prior to release of any permits from the Building Division. Building Division Permits: The following is a brief overview of the type of permits issued by the Building Division. For a more detailed explanation of these permits, please contact the Development Services Counter at 503-639-4171, ext. 304. Site Improvement Permit (SIT). This permit is generally issued for all new commercial, industrial and multi-family projects. This permit will also be required for land partitions where lot grading and private utility work is required. This permit covers all on-site preparation, grading and utility work. Home builders will also be required to obtain a SIT permit for grading work in cases where the lot they are working on has slopes in excess of 20% and foundation excavation material is not to be hauled from the site. Building Permit (BUP). This permit covers only the construction of the building and is issued after, or concurrently with, the SIT permit. CITY OF TIGARD Pre-Application Conference Notes Page 5 of 6 Engineering Department Section • Master Permit (MST` his permit is issued for all single ar iulti-family buildings. It covers all work necessary for building construction, including sub-traces (excludes grading, etc.). This permit can not be issued in a subdivision until the public improvements are substantially complete and a mylar copy of the recorded plat has been returned by the applicant to the City. For a land partition, the applicant must obtain an Engineering Permit, if required, and return a mylar copy of the recorded plat to the City prior to issuance of this permit. Other Permits. There are other special permits, such as mechanical, electrical and plumbing that may also be required. Contact the Development Services Counter for more information. GRADING PLAN REQUIREMENTS FOR SUBDIVISIONS All subdivision projects shall require a proposed grading plan prepared by the design engineer. The engineer will also be required to indicate which lots have natural slopes between 10% and 20%, as well as lots that have natural slopes in excess of 20%. This information will be necessary in determining if special grading inspections will be required when the lots develop. The design engineer will also be required to shade all structural fill areas on the construction plans. In addition, each homebuilder will be required to submit a specific site and floor plan for each lot. The site plan shall include topographical contours and indicate the elevations of the corners of the lot. The builder shall also indicate the proposed elevations at the four corners of the building. PREPARED BY: q 7 ii�oz- ENGINEERING DEPARTMENT STAFF TE Phone: 1503)639-4171 Fat 15031624-0752 iaeng\brianr\templates\preap notes-eng dot Revised: March 21,2002 CITY OF TIGARD Pre-Application Conference Notes Page 6 016 Engineering Department Section . . ., . PRE-APPLICATION :alit CONFERENCE REQUEST CITY OF TIGARD 13125 SW Hall Blvd., Tigard, OR 97223(503) 639-4171 FAX: (503) 684-7297 GENERAL INFORMATION ky.e..._ FO R STAFF USE ONLY Applicant: v� � l c,` Address: (ctl‘, C iAje l (t`"-. Phone:.3:k3 acv/ 75-1f Case No.: fee- 1-007- -- O(30'7 2_ City: COWIti to Zip: Wet°. Receipt No.: X02 - 3 3 (.5$ pp '4 Application Accepted By: K Contact Person: MAV�A C lav o Phone:V3" ('75 71 Date: 4No z- II g_5- 73 Z�' Property Owner/Deed Holder(s): Ci fz`-‘-' C ' , DATE OF PRE-APP.: glr2/- M� Mo ct k FY J Kr' 40 l TIME OF PRE-APP.: i/.U3 Address: 1417,0 6 -Div 5 /i11{ phone:x3-71-3-010 PRE-APP. HELD WITH:M 7 � 11 City: Avirg o -- CO • Zip: CJ �• Rev.7/1/2002 is\curpin\masters\revised\Pre-AppRequest.doc Property Address/Location(s): r71-6- S(iJ fj if c l lW . REQUIRED SUBMITTAL ELEMENTS 11 (Note: applications will not be accepted without the required submittal elements) Tax Map & Tax Lot#(s): 161 3&- GO—D11700 Zonin g: C-C?. _ Pre-Application Conf. Request Form �-f' q 2. 7 6o'CS 2 COPIES EACH OF THE FOLLOWING: Site Size: (! I t 7l Z !7 J d hiI rat LI Brief Description of the Proposal and wove_/'" ft,intiv/� yl�,'C. SPELL t ,, ,,,, �G M„_ dt �� any site-specific questions/issues that PRE-APPLICATION CONFERENCE INFORMATION J°w you would like to have staff research ( C12) ( prior to the meeting. All of the information identified on this form are required to be a submitted by the applicant and received by the Planning Division a ■ Site Plan. The site plan must show the„ minimum of one (1) week prior to officially scheduling a proposed lots and/or building layouts pre-application conference date/time to allow staff ample time to drawn to scale. Also, show the location prepare for the meeting. of the subject property in relation to the nearest streets; and the locations of A pre-application conference can usually be scheduled within 1-2 driveways on the subject property and weeks of the Planning Division's receipt of the request for either across the street. Tuesday or Thursday mornings. Pre-application conferences are ❑ The Proposed Uses. one (1) hour long and are typically held between the hours of ❑ Topographic Information. Include 9:00-11:00 AM. Contour Lines if Possible. PRE-APPLICATION CONFERENCES MUST BE SCHEDULED IN ❑ If the Pre-Application Conference is for a PERSON AT THE COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT COUNTER FROM MONOPOLE project, the applicant must 8:00-4:00/MONDAY-FRIDAY. attach a copy of the letter and proof in the form of an affidavit of mailing, that IF MORE THAN 4 PEOPLE ARE EXPECTED TO ATTEND THE the collocation protocol was completed PRE-APPLICATION CONFERENCE IN YOUR GROUP, PLEASE (see Section 18.798.080 of the Tigard INFORM THE CITY IN ADVANCE SO THAT ALTERNATE ROOM Community Development Code). ARRANGEMENTS CAN BE MADE TO ACCOMMODATE THE El Filing Fee $200.00 GROUP. Pre-Apps (CD Meetings) September 2002 S M T W T F S 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 A 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 Thursday, September 12, 2002 8:00 9:00AM Pre-app 8:30 9:00 No preaps here, please. BR. 9:30 10:00 Pre-App 10:30 11:09 Pre-app Ferrando Gallarzo 323.869-7591 Cash & Carry 11745 SW Pacific Hwy 11:30 12:00 12:30 1:00 1:30 2:00 2:30 3:00 3:30 4:00 4:30 5:00 5:30 6:00 3:30PM Monday, September 09, 2002 Lt.35. to 68 I if f a-n rS /hi .2213 r I L ' 21°32X51f P I. .: � . • a;. ,... •rw-:.• • '9'291-. W _ '-4� 0 C i •�� ° b, � s. A _a _ _ �, �./�.///J' .. �e ti e� 4i„,, . rr. . ~V z�" Ct�p c 4 •c c a C 'c e. c•o c t IC'y Iiir WK (E•. ilb r- • ,50E-., 0... , . ..-- . . . .• 1.G 7SIt. ooNa, w Vi'µ' n f I /i' 4'* ' Y t` s ' WITH FENCE (EXISTING BUILDING) ''• / ' r 1 `- • : % - /••i CASH AND CARRY LEASE SPACE p�� VV KIN'6 j . c•N �I 22 60$ S.F. ^'',, ... town-, .RCSfi111Pc' PAK A ' ':. ;� 9,772 S.F. pad a tTy pRGIN .N :�.�� % ..••' ` v`:;•Li'.'••y'+* .� TENANT IMPROVEMENT •I SALES-ORIENTED,.. ° (� ,�` 'a =j�' (C_G)SALES-ORIENTED . . <. a: { .. +.I ,'.:e''• a.:'-.' • ...i........,.;'. 41,• 4co, .. ` '1 i I orbc C( ! � � %. .E[EC1h!c METE 4 `t'1` . ' .. 'p'''....1,:t;_•!.,;y.44 a1K 1 *'" �� • 111 ' ,;l�:k> s 11, _«. , Cy'.�, .'Ew5t1NO i �ti�t •;,,Ffh^.! ...M1:. l'•.'�N, r -o V u a' "•;,�,.4y�, a e" ilr 'RETAIL STORES•. 1 1 ��I • ." r �..��' .A.m//��ir&z.4,d.oL. ,.. i� J ,.. .'.�SIm, 0, ,BUIU]aN0 - �!•111 '•9 • •� • (M1p(t* ,L © ! ` • 17'14.. .AD •` "`,• ! .0�ik,t/ ., •'�y. j . .. a , ,; . ,, G nr OR4 tin ,.,/ " (D :5P11 T`;,. it} • 11i ftL�ST141RR' .1°A14641 NO PIdK 1 t �� • ,'. ., ,�v: '�ii • .' ��+,", ••Il }1 „ C •� •// ` .'! .�. ��i F el f• ^ 4i..:' .A-`-__-1_ ,_261 .! !•A 9W. •� 7 - � BUI lNG t 00 1� I� G '' ,C.G�� ` .'i ') �,, • II ii. r 1 OVERHANG ►6:• e G ' .k 1i tF+�'*i U9 'j� ` ys,•aso A .4.i.1.15 ; .,.......... , !pX,51p7,46 �p O A f'!' • y : \, / . •,� mot,• •... •� o •� 'w`'1 5•7k!Z('Irk+~\ J� � � • - .+. ..• • Pep., :, , ^6; :.;.'' . r .•"�� .... .v, p : -1 i" r, •••• �, Ir1!f AI �., 1 cf e:!-'44•,.. ;N.AT•8' • ';'1:':.:i:sy"'-•.;14;.•- ..;.e:•,-. SITE DATA: : SITE AREA(EXISTING): 107,787 S.F.(2A7 ACRES) BUILDING GROSS S.F.: 32,380 S.F. 22,808 S.F.-CASH&CARRY 5,772 S.F.—LEASE SPACE ZONING: C-G(COMMERCIAL GENERAL) USE(NEW): SALES-ORIENTED PARKING REQUIRED 120 STALLS -3.7n,000. (32,380/1000)x 3.7=120 -50%STANDARD SPACE S HANDICAP STALLS -50%COMPACT SPACE 68 STANDARDE 67 COMPACT PARKING PROVIDED 121 STALLS(INCLUDING 5 (NEW): HANDICAP STALLS) -REQUIRED MIN.ACCESSIBLE 6 HANDICAP STALLS SPACE c 120 STALLS.6 68 STANDARD 55 COMPACT PARKING STALL STANDARD:8.5'x 18.5' DIMENSIONS: COMPACT: 7.5'x 18.5' HANDICAP: 8'x 18' LANDSCAPE LOT ACTUAL 17.5% COVERAGE(EXISTING): REQUIRED: 15% • DATE: PLANS CHECK NO Sept 25, 2002 PROJECT TITLE: COUNTYWIDE Smart & Final TRAFFIC IMPACT FEE WORKSHEET APPLICANT (FOR NON-SINGLE FAMILY USES) MAILING ADDRESS: CITY/ZIP/PHONE TAX MAP NO.: SITES NO ADDRESS: LAND USE CATEGORY RATE PER TRIP RESIDENTIAL $ 239.00 BUSINESS AND COMMERCIAL $ 60.00 X OFFICE $ 220.00 Estimate partial building INDUSTRIAL $ 230.00 �,}( INSTITUTIONAL $ 99.00 e PAYMENT METHOD: 0 0 6 a,f0'L CASH/CHECK CREDIT BANCROFT(PROMISSORY NOTE) USE LAND CATEGORY DESCRIPTION OF USE WEEKDAY AVG INSTITUTIONAL ONLY DEFER TO OCCUPANCY 815 Discount store TRIP RATE 70.16 WEEKEND AVG.TRIP RATE BASIS: The applicant proposes converting 22,608 sq. ft. of a furniture store to discount store CALCULATIONS: TIF = (( Week day Avg. Trips X T.G.S.F.) - credit ) X Rate Per Trip $327,323 = (( 70.16 X 22.608 ) - ( 4.35 X 22.608 )) X $220 Transit Amt. = Projected Trip Rate X $18 $26,784 = 1488 X $18 PROJECT TRIP GENERATION: 1488 FEE: $327,323 FOR ACCOUNTING PURPOSES ONLY ADDITIONAL NOTES 98 trip credit applied for previous use (#890 furniture store 4.35 trip rate) ROAD AMT. $300,539 TRANSIT AMT $26,784 PREPARED BY S.S. Casper I:TIFWKST.DOC (DST) EFF: 07-01-98 I rip 6-esi er 0±10 vi 5'.' end Survey J SDEYLJ� G R O U P -- - MACKENZIE October 22, 2002 City of Tigard Attention: Brian Rager 3125 SW Hall Boulevard M m Tigard, OR 97223 0 N_ O P e] 0.r\ M O N OC y Re: Tigard Cash and Carry • E Trip Generation Summary . Group Mackenzie Project#020247 N • E M A � Dear Mr. Rager: 0. Group Mackenzie has prepared this trip generation letter for the proposed Cash and Carry store aZ in Tigard,Oregon. Cash and Carry trip information will be used to calculate the City of Tigard's Traffic Impact Fee(TIF)and to determine if the Oregon Department of Transportation(ODOT) will require a transportation impact study(TIS). The City of Tigard is not requiring a traffic • M study for the proposed Cash and Carry store. P y The proposed Cash and Carry store will occupy 22,608 SF of the vacant Sears Home Life furniture store and will use an existing access to Highway 99W. This access is currently shared with other retail shops and is the only access available to the Cash and Carry store. Group Mackenzie, Incorporated Trip generation for the proposed Cash and Carry store has been estimated using trip information Architecture collected in May 1996 at Cash and Carry sites in Salem, Gresham, and Clackamas. A copy of Interior Design the trip survey is attached. Land Use Planning Group Customer counts,vehicle counts,and trip survey information were used to calculate an average Mackenzie daily trip (ADT)rate of 24.99 trips per 1000 square feet(KSF), an AM peak hour rate of 1.87 Engineering,corp rat trips/KSF, and a PM peak hour rate of 2.60 trips/KSF, and to identify trip types. Incorporated P p Civil/Structural Engineering Transportation Planning • The tradition a! Mackenzie Engineering and Mackenzie/Saito `a°"°"°8' H:\PROJECTS\020247\WP\2j2211.wpd Brian Rager Project Number 020247 October 22, 2002 Page 2 CITY OF TIGARD TRAFFIC IMPACT FEE Customer counts and the building square footage of each Cash and Carry site were used to calculate an average daily trip rate of 24.99 trips/KSF. This rate should be used in the City's TIF calculation, with a trip credit given for the equivalent square footage of the previous furniture store. The City of Tigard will make the final TIF calculation. ODOT TRANSPORTATION IMPACT STUDY REQUIREMENTS Division 51 Rules state that a transportation impact study shall be required when any proposed development is expected to generate vehicle trips that equal or exceed 600 daily or 100 hourly trips (Section 734-051-0180). Vehicle counts, trip survey data, and the building square footage were used to calculate peak hour trip generation rates as well as pass-by,new,and diverted link trip rates. The average trip rates are presented above.The AM peak and PM peak hour pass-by rates were calculated as 28% and 24%,respectively.Trip generation for the proposed Tigard Cash and Carry and the previous furniture store, using the equivalent square footage, is presented in the table below. ITrip Generation Characteristics I AM Peak Hour PM Peak Hour Land Use ADT Enter Exit Enter Exit Cash and Carry' 565 21 21 31 28 Pass-by 6 6 7 7 Furniture Store2 114 3 1 4 6 Pass-by 0 0 3 3 Difference I 451 18 16 25 24 -Trip generation of the generator 2 -Trip generation of the adjacent street The Cash and Carry store is expected to generate a net ADT of 451 new trips,34 AM peak hour new trips, and 49 PM peak hour new trips, with trip credit given for the equivalent square footage of the previous furniture store. This trip generation does not equal or exceed ODOT's daily or hourly trip limits. H:1PRO JECTS 10202471WP\2 j 2211.wpd • A oof Brian Rager Project Number 020247 October 22, 2002 Page 3 CONCLUSIONS The Cash and Carry store is expected to generate 451 net new average daily trips, with credit given for the equivalent square footage of the previous furniture store.This trip total should be used to calculate the City's TIF. The trip generation for the proposed Cash and Carry does not equal or exceed ODOT's daily or hourly trip limits. For this reason, Group Mackenzie requests that ODOT does not require a transportation impact study. Group Mackenzie also requests that the existing access remain a permitted access. If you have any questions or comments,please call me at 503-224-9560. Sincerely, 103•P ' `4 Brent T. Ahrend, PE Traffic Engineer i OREGON 0 Enclosures v,P�;'ACa 02.‘4��a NT T. ANA MKK/BTA:mpd [ EXPIRES: 12/31/O3 c: Fernando Gallarzo—Smart&Final Christian Snuffin—Oregon Department of Transportation Will Harris Mary Kate Koonce—Group Mackenzie H:\PROJECTS\020247\WP\2j 2211.wpd CASH AND CARRY TRIP SURVEY October 21,2002 • Group Mackenzie Project# 020247 PROTTA , 1969 V' OREGON +44CH 02.`c 9FN r r ANA� EXPIRES• 12/31/63 PREPARED BY: GROUP -4-MACKE NZ I E 0690 SW Bancroft Street / PO Box 69039 • Portland.OR 97239 Tel:503.224.9560•Net:info @grpmack.com •Fax:503.228.1285 H:\PROJECTS\020247\WP\2j22d 1.wpd r INTRODUCTION The purpose of this report is to present peak hour and daily trip generation rates, as well as pass-by, diverted link, and new trip information distinctive to Cash and Carry stores. The Institute of Transportation Engineer's (ITE) Trio Generation does not include a land use category similar to Cash and Carry's wholesale/retail operations.For this reason,a vehicle count and trip survey was conducted by Group Mackenzie staff at Cash and Carry stores in May 1996. At the time,the survey was conducted for an independent Traffic Impact Fee(TIP)survey,in Clark County, Washington,which addressed only average daily traffic(ADT)and trip lengths.This report includes AM peak and PM peak hour data as well. DATA COLLECTION Vehicle counts and trip surveys were conducted at three Cash and Carry stores located in Salem, Gresham,and Clackamas on May 8,9,and 10, 1996,respectively.The stores'hours of operation are 7:00 AM to 5:00 PM. The sites were surveyed from 6:30 AM to 5:30 PM. The Gresham and Vancouver sites were generally surveyed in 15-minute to 30-minute increments. The Salem site survey time intervals are inconsistent. For this reason, adjustments have been made to present the data collected in one-hour increments. The trip survey included questions that were asked of random customers when they visited the site. Between 5 and 15 surveys were conducted per hour. The questions were composed to determine whether the vehicle trip could be described as new, diverted link, or pass-by. For clarity, the trip types are defined below as assumed in the survey.A copy of the survey questions and data collection sheets are enclosed with this report. • New Trips: Trips generated by a specific use which were not already on the roadway and which will return to their point of origin after stopping at the development.These trips stop only at the Cash and Carry as the primary destination. • Diverted Link Trip: Trips to the site from vehicles already traveling in the area, but not on adjacent streets. These trips must change their direction to get to the site. • Pass-by Trip: Trips to the site which are already driving by on the adjacent roadways. They do not increase the total traffic volumes on the roadways, but do add to turning movement volumes at the site accesses. DATA RESULTS It was later determined that the week ending May 10 was one of the busiest of the year for the Cash and Carry stores. To account for an average week, customer transaction counts were reviewed for the five previous weeks and compared with the customer count for the week ending May 10. The table below indicates the weekly customer totals and averages for the six-week period beginning March 30 and ending May 10. H:\PROJECTS\020247\WP\2j22d l.wpd 2 Weekly Customer Counts Supplied by United Grocers Week Ending Store Average April 5 April 12 I April 19 April 26 I May 3 May 10 Salem 1417 1335 1392 1439 1497 1547 1438 Gresham 1748 1484 1554 1591 1675 1774 1638 Clackamas 1746 1625 1606 1676 1725 1744 1687 The survey results for the week ending May 10, 1996,were adjusted to reflect the weekly average. The table below summarizes the calculation of the number of average daily trips per 1000 square feet (KSF). Adjusted Daily Trip Rates Customers Daily Trips Building Daily Site May 10 Average Week % Survey I Adjusted KSF Trips/KSF Salem 1547 1438 92.95 409 380 19.60 19.39 Gresham 1774 1638 92.33 552 510 18.22 27.99 Clackamas 1744 1687 96.73 599 579 21.00 27.57 An average daily trip rate of 24.99 trips per KSF was obtained from the three sites. Vehicles counts conducted at the three Cash and Carry sites were used to identify the peak hour trip generation. Review of the vehicle counts identified the AM peak hour occurring from 7:30 AM to 8:30 AM and the PM peak hour occurring from 3:30 PM to 4:30 PM. The building square footage of each site and the total trips entering and exiting each site during the peak hours are summarized in the table below. I Trip Generation and Building Size -I Salem Gresham Clackamas Total Enter Exit Enter Exit Enter Exit AM Peak(7:30-8:30 AM) 11 11 21 21 23 23 110 PM Peak (3:30-4:30 PM) 24 15 32 34 23 25 153 Building Size (ksf) 19.60 18.22 21.00 58.82 H:\PROJECTS\020247\WP\2j22d 1.wpd 3 Based on the peak hour trip totals and a summation of the building sizes,the average trip rate for the AM peak hour is 1.87 trips/KSF and 2.60 trips/KSF for the PM peak hour.The entering and exiting trip distribution is 50% entering/ 50% exiting during the AM peak hour and 52% entering/ 48% exiting during the PM peak hour. Trip survey information for each site during the AM peak hour and PM peak hour is summarized in the table below. IPeak Hour Trip Type Summary AM Peak Hour PM Peak Hour Total Site AM PM Salem Gresham Clackamas Salem Gresham Clackamas Peak Peak New 3 10 4 9 8 9 17 26 Diverted Link 3 1 2 3 2 0 6 5 Pass-by 3 3 3 2 5 3 9 10 Total 32 41 At the three Cash and Carry sites, 32 vehicles were surveyed during the AM peak hour, and 41 vehicles were surveyed during the PM peak hour. During both peak hours the majority of the trips were characterized as new. The table below presents new,diverted link,and pass-by trip percentages for the AM peak hour and PM peak hour. Peak Hour Trip Rates Trip Type AM Peak Hour PM Peak Hour New 53% 64% Diverted Link 19% 12% 28% 24% As mentioned above,the majority of the trips at the sites were characterized as new.During the AM peak hour 53%of the trips were new. During the PM peak hour 64%of the trips were new. Pass-by rates during the AM peak hour and PM peak hour were 28% and 24%, respectively. CONCLUSIONS Three Cash and Carry sites were surveyed in May 1996. Customer counts and building square footage of the sites were used to estimate the average daily trip rate of 24.99 trips per KSF. Vehicle counts were used to calculate peak hour average trip rates of 1.87 trips per KSF during the AM peak hour and 2.60 trips per KSF during the PM peak hour. Trip surveys identified that 28% and 24%of the trips are characterized as pass-by during the AM peak hour and PM peak hour, respectively. H:\PROJECTS\020247\WP\2j22d l.wpd 4 SURVEY SUMMARY CASH AND CARRY SALEM GRESHAM CLACKAMAS Enter Exit Enter Exit Enter Exit Total 6:30 - 7:30 7 3 8 2 11 4 35 7:30 - 8:30 11 11 21 21 23 23 110 8:30 - 9:30 15 14 30 31 37 29 156 9:30 - 10:30 29 21 39 38 36 37 200 10:30 - 11:30 20 17 28 25 35 38 163 11:30 - 12:30 22 26 33 33 37 35 186 12:30 - 13:30 13 18 27 31 32 21 142 13:30 - 14:30 27 30 18 17 32 32 156 14:30 - 15:30 27 30 26 18 31 31 163 15:30 - 16:30 24 15 32 34 23 25 153 16:30 - 17:30 10 19 17 23 9 18 96 TOTAL 205 204 279 273 306 293 Total Trips Total Trips Day Trips/ Six-Week Average 1000 6-wk Base Location Per Day Per Week Week Average Day/Week Sq. Feet Trip Rate Salem 409 1547 0.26 1438 380 19.60 19.40 Gresham 552 1774 0.31 1638 510 18.22 27.97 Clackamas 599 1744 _ 0.34 1687 579 21 27.59 Average 24.99 AM PEAK(7:30-8:30 AM) PM PEAK(15:30-16:30) Total Salem Gresham Clackamas Salem Gresham Clackamas AM/PM New 3 10 4 6 7 9 17/26 Q3 0 0 0 3 1 0 Q4 Divert. 3 1 2 3 2 0 6/5 Other Pass-by 3 3 3 2 5 3 9/10 Total 32 41 I ISalem Gresham Clackamas I Total Building Size 19.60 18.22 21 58.82 AM Peak Hour Rate=AM Peak Trips/E Building Sizes=110/58.82= 1.87 trips/ksf PM Peak Hour Rate=PM Peak Trips/E Building Sizes=153/58.82= 2.60 trips/ksf Trip Types AM Peak PM Peak New 17/32= 53% 26/41 = 64% Diverted 6/32= 19% 5/41 = 12% Pass-by 9/32= 28% 10/41= 24% h:\projects\020247\traffic\candcsrvy.xls SALEM CASH AND CARRY SURVEY QUESTIONS... 1. Where did your trip begin immediately prior to arriving here?(home,work...) Date: 5- ?- 96. 2. Will you go back to your origin from here?(no-#3,yes-#6) Initials: iN 3. Was this your primary destination?(no-#4,yes-#6) Location: SA tiFrif 4. Was it necessary to change your normal driving route?(no=Thank you!,yes-#5) Job Name: Cash&Carry 5. How far out of your way did you travel to get here?(Thank you!) Job Number: 194083.03 6. How far did you travel to get here?(Thank you!) Time Period: 6.'30- c;,.:10 ENTER I )/ / EXIT s' VEH ID Q 1 Q2 Q3 Q4 Q5 Q6 _ NOTES ✓A 41 i.i/o iJ-' Y: F ye . /' v'/,/y7�C !k "✓ A • 4°L -7C)CI 41�Ir t f�/1 _ 1/! 7/1; 1- 1 . . _ _ _ 1 Time Period: r`,'q i.- ,P,, ;,/ ENTER ' ' ' i EXIT VEH ID Q I Q2 Q3 Q4 Q5 Q6 NOTES y� /, p ,/74,. ','-';',1;,' 4./(f /Y' 7/7'; /YLA P N X0/1 i ,t,/g A! 9 /4 n7, 6.4 ' ''. VI ek 1, '0 ■ /r_ , '? . l/� /n1 ,,H///C_ �i On . 'r, c -r I!%11 l I:/ ( I( i;`_.'i),,/:'D...r f ft;, �2' i_ r ' Y 'i1f ;1. Al' ■/ y'. �� ',11 ' v-Li2 VI I f 1 1 Y'. )/E. ',"- 1, . H:\PROJECTS\TRAFFIC\TEMP\CBCSUR VY.WPD SURVEY QUESTIONS... 1. Where did your trip begin immediately prior to arriving here?(home,work...) Date: _i":"--,J7-47,; 2. Will you go back to your origin from here?(no-#3,yes-#6) Initials: 3. Was this your primary destination?(no-#4,yes-#6) Location: 4. Was it necessary to change your normal driving route?(no=Thank you!,yes-#5) Job Name: Cash&Carry 5. How far out of your way did you travel to get here?(Thank you!) Job Number: 194083.03 6. How far did you travel to get here?(Thank you!) Time Period: P,';17- -7?'"7"1 ENTER j l I EXIT , VEH ID Q1 ._ Q2 Q3 Q4 Q5 Q6 NOTES •',-.1-/I' , - - . /-/-Ar 2' , t.,./(' \/-,- ,... OP . . , ...„ /7)-71- ( ' vkli fr. v //.1-.. 5 , . . - A . i . , % *:- /:`-61 / - - - .._ Time Period: / ".: ;0"-/. .7.2,7) ... ENTER ' 4 1./\/1 ' I EXIT r- ,)„ ) _," VEH ID QI Q2 Q3 Q4 Q5 Q6 NOTES 11 ; ' - .-' . S' 1V ) - \tS Al.) i /11 i -Al i!,---i•: tqs s=-... VA l'" i AI M O Al(1 A 4.(16,-/=,--: -1-.^)/1-)t- No e 1,0_ t. irt \t\J p i e--- , 0 a lifl Ab E g ' k-E' f ig-(-: W. IN(' q'S ,, 11 in I , - •z/..o5 5,itiC7- jvc.A AT 9414•=-7111te." HAPROJECTS\TRAFFIC\TEMP\C&CSURVY.WPD SURVEY QUESTIONS... 1. Where did your trip begin immediately prior to arriving here?(home,work...) Date: "5 I Q I9c 2. Will you go back to your origin from here?(no-#3, yes-#6) Initials: I]L.T= 3. Was this your primary destination?(no-#4,yes-#6) Location: 1355 5—i.,., +„,1.,4_, "IE. 4. Was it necessary to change your normal driving route?(no=Thank you!,yes-#5) Job Name: Cash&Carry 5. How far out of your way did you travel to get here?(Thank you!) Job Number: 194083.03 6. How far did you travel to get here?(Thank you!) Time Period: 9— 9,Z-i ENTER .... EXIT L1411 1 I VEH ID Q1 Q: Q3 Q4 Q5 Q6 NOTES —RP Cot ildo- — N _ 1C-. m.rL •,I 04‘ N wo- [ R y 5,rn,..ss 65E, Nom. r 1 i `f-c..,,; , act 315 via„_ . _ 5y►-;.L , ppk 191- Ham - 1 r4 ti — ', (Aso,' 1e,-. tiovv-- ` j,,,, Pl_1 . 1'1 s� 1 V►1;1.4_5 U c;, 1H, y I-Lent US -5r111j ',401-7\C- y 4 rn;Ie.9, Time Period: 5=Z}— 10'1, ENTER U'l4 le ti\i EXIT 0 h'i VEH ID QI I Q2 1 Q3 Q4 Q5 Q6 I NOTES 51L Zy\ ?.. 1i sill 1i 1\1 5 k_ 1 m � '1 0Z,7._ Z�\4rk '/ 10 Y+1;t JN ,M Viavic Y N ti SJ.S° -S Wor17- (4 ..,\■103 Lu\( i V\i _ rnU � H:\PROJECTS\TRAFFIC\TEMP`,C&CSURVY.W PD • SURVEY d UESTIONS... Q n: cnai v i�� 5 I�/9k.0 1. Where did your trip begin immediately prior to arriving here?(home,work... Date: 2. Will you go back to your origin from here?(no-#3, yes-#6) Du.,.r.kur-- wr-z Initials: Q+-F. 3. Was this your primary destination?(no-44,yes-46) C-4, �� s� e.tih,,�c ti r.•.w.I°Ocation: 4. Was it necessary to change your normal driving route?(no=Thank you!,yes-#5) Job Name: Cash&Carry 5. How far out of your way did you travel to get here?(Thank you!) Job Number: 194083.03 6. How far did you travel to get here?(Thank you!) 5 • Time Period: i0 10 ENTER Diti Af V t EXIT } VEH ID Q1 Q2 -Q3 Q4 Q5 Q6 _ NOTES 1 ar. ( 94 , tt'. 1`haDZo trdc:{1C._ - NIr ��, N N � ynhniF+ t Time Period: 10:6'S— /7 la) ENTER 11} EXIT VEH ID Q1 Q2 Q3 Q4 Q5 Q6 NOTES zed p,rr,� N 8145 PY-Q wa-+_ \I 15,•) 5 `l R ?t, zit- ock_ y 501 D92.— Kos- 1`1 isgFARE 1-5q Aki7- H:\PROJECTS\TRAFFIC',TEMP\C&CSURVY.WPD . . . 1' SURVEY QUESTIONS... 1. Where did your trip begin immediately prior to arriving here?(home,work...) Date: 5---,f2-96.. 2. Will you go back to your origin from here?(no-#3,yes-#6) Initials: 77' 3. Was this your primary destination?(no-#4,yes-#6) Location: 4. Was it necessary to change your normal driving route?(no=Thank you!,yes-45) Job Name:Cash&Carry 5. How far out of your way did you travel to get here?(Thank you!) Job Number: 194083.03 6. How far did you travel to get here?(Thank you!) Time Period:/013.';4-/,'.,P7,1 H ENTER Alif H , EXIT _ VEH ID Q I Q2 Q3 Q4 Q5 Q6 NOTES / •572'et--CY./0.-Var. '-•-'"'' ";':'. I'''/Oil ' \I 6 a . , . v • iisfil.,70.ta.v.• , , (» ?-:, vec‘ ...4 . ,...- y : n i vili i. 1 /7/ niv!;/.., 11,;Li.-,. -4-.a.- 1 , I.A, VI/,."; .i—. A.).r i- -s I • I' • r; ‘ * ,- ' • ' '' ' I A4-) 00 I\::LK -"; , i , , --,... I, - . ,- 1) j• ! /'• - ,./7, f, ..-;../ -P7:7 V.01. r'' .\,; sik....., .., . • Time Period: /. .2, - • RENTER L yr,/ A.',...'2y• EXIT . , VEH ID Q1 Q2 Q3 Q4 Q5 Q6 NOTES n.'\; a& . ) •.- V 47._. iii\ja-'1: tfi 1.1)1 4) I -ini).4,- \//- -., 3.517]; 301) (lb tA41.g y E Jo fill g: k..:-• v:,_'. ,i...-,:2-: 1,f.pair P \i .-,,-i 6,iil. ,/i,....•.,1 ,00..7 Atitg ■/11%c , rl 1 :, :PJ . . /.\ • I , ' it ; i /r , ric'-ift wori; \it HAPROJECTS\TRAFFICTEMP\C&CSURVY.WPD . .. ... ■ SURVEY QUESTIONS... 1. Where did your trip begin immediately prior to arriving here?(home,work...) Date: ,....4--j7-9‘ 2. Will you go back to your origin from here?(no-#3,yes-#6) Initials: 7-2=7" 3. Was this your primary destination?(no-#4,yes-#6) Location: . 5144E777 4. Was it necessary to change your normal driving route?(no=Thank you!,yes-#5) Job Name: Cash&Carry 5. How far out of your way did you travel to get here?(Thank you!) Job Number: 194083.03 6. How far did you travel to get here?(Thank you!) • Time Period: a% :0,9.. r. ," a :d' •e''. e I ENTER 421 I ft EXIT VEH ID Q1 _ Q2 _ Q3 _ Q4 Q5 Q6 NOTES .. ffil'.1 (71)(1 VO C g r\id NO ii () i 1l.1 -(` '', \AI:1 -. \IV ,I, -- I De 9/1): 1- .1 ',, 4.. " II 1- '' \ •'.-: /n • i••.)n.: . .... • - _ .. /; . .. .! i: • /• / ,. . • , ., . . _ , n- . 1 "•ri :. v ;': 7. a a" .. !.--‘ I ; : 1 : H. - .': ; • 4-, I , .- a;• ..... , , ..... _ /- Time Period: ,-1," 17.:, -.=_:- - ENTER --2/ A' 1 1 1; I EXIT ... . . - VEH ID Q I Q2 Q3 Q4 Q5 Q6 NOTES . /,---- • /./ ,,• / td: t . P.,' (r 12 L.-Y .--, A101),, \I „..., t .- iv.= AlnEi . vii.::—. , -lnit. 6, 111k gq WiLli . I\ c- . U 1. Ai ciY: \AP( - \I 6 -.1-: NO L;:7c- .-i)alk \/ Q ,i../„. • , 'V e,-- ,,.. • • . _ ._, . . A, Ali .e. c; n• /pi 'N"1:.:.. : n), - -/ .1ff ...i' ot.- 11)flii k V;;:. .=, - gt/111, - HAPROJECTS\TRAFFIC\TEMP\C&CSURVY.WPD SURVEY QUESTIONS... S 1. Where did your trip begin immediately prior to arriving here?(home,work...) Date: l 2. Will you go back to your origin from here?(no-#3,yes-#6) Initials: D!-.i` 3. Was this your primary destination?(no-#4,yes-#6) Location: 4. Was it necessary to change your normal driving route?(no=Thank you!,yes-#5) Job Name: Cash&Carry 5. How far out of your way did you travel to get here?(Thank you!) Job Number: 194083.03 6. How far did you travel to get here?(Thank you!) Time Period: S'.°0— :5(3 ENTER _`t 'i' EXIT , �� VEH ID QI Q2 Q3 Q4 Q5 Q6 NOTES U FN( Z-}i-1/4 Jc k- N 1 Zo'`� 1-0 Ni,6ip ky V.- y I fn.,►.e55 _ .. . ----- __ .._` zZ ,,,. k-n 3z g,-i;___ r , .5 ITC- `vi, Y ,v-,r,, I25 SVE6y5 Horne— t4 P tki ►EE 53 o tnk _. y LI_ - ►illa5-moo( �- Y. e Period: E R i EXIT ...\ 4,,,,,,, VEH ID QI Q2 _ Q3 Q4 Q5 .6 NOTES 74,_* • NN.. H:\PROJECTS\TRAFFIC\TEMP\C&CSURVY.WPD SURVEY QUESTIONS... 1. Where did your trip begin immediately prior to arriving here?(home,work...) Date: 5 IS 19 L., 2. Will you go back to your origin from here?(no-#3, yes-#6) Initials: Ot-F 3. Was this your primary destination?(no-#4,yes-#6) Location: 4. Was it necessary to change your normal driving route?(no=Thank you!,yes-#5) Job Name: Cash&Carry 5. How far out of your way did you travel to get here?(Thank you!) Job Number: 194083.03 6. How far did you travel to get here?(Thank you!) Time Period: D •3`.- `I:1O ENTER AlligrAMIIIIII EXIT VEH ID Q1 1 Q2 Q3 Q4 Q5 Q6 NOTES U'..Ao dov-k y 6 vn, .QKU loo N t1 _ N LA, . ____ ,,,.iFs- T ?LA Oft Hov� - - N N Y 5 �,� a`. `_ 45LotZ 'Vic rf Ni Z.5vn ,25 ur1 Z t -k_ y S rv,,► P-vk -i-0 - N N N l- +A,/0,-k- N Y (S m i la3 , TLv.0 la 14Q,,,- N `/ 5 mi EFL a,. w°Y�. y Z ..4vi4 Time Period: 4.10—S•••�` ENTER X11` X►` E 1 EXIT -.gZEIYEJECW111 VEH ID Ql Q2 Q3 Q4 Q5 Q6 NOTES 5-1NAS41- N er — N N Y 4 I 6511 W0 r k N to m; 37)c. PDC 1!J,.-k-- `i S ► fi, 1 D Si lark- ' 30 0,;7e5 acE 3 Wov-k_ 3 tT;l� � i H N y �= _ w4,:, Y 2_1- H:\PROJECTS\TRAFFIC\TEMP\C&CSURVY.WPD GRESHAM CASH AND CARRY . .:- •. . , SURVEY QUESTIONS... 1. Where did your trip begin immediately prior to arriving here?(home,work...) Date: .51. -?-4'6 2. Will you go back to your origin from here?(no-43,yes-46) Initials: 3. Was this your primary destination?(no-44,yes-46) Location: 4-' ),,e7 }4,4/1? 4. Was it necessary to change your normal driving route?(no=Thank you!,yes-45) Job Name: Cash&Carry 5. How far out of your way did you travel to get here?(Thank you!) Job Number: 194083.03 6. How far did you travel to get here?(Thank you!) Time Period:/,',24 - ENTER ki1 ■!\ EXIT _ —...1.-. VEH ID Q1 Q2 Q3 Q4 i Q5 Q6 NOTES 's)c/4'L'7177 \AO/". ■ \4f-r: 1) • ' NO i1.01 ffil;.- ...1.7 1/,-,tk/ ,, . -- .... , ! , - \,, .-, A LI • ' . 1' 10 il' '--- " ,/ 7. ,' .2 -. YL. 0); Time Period: ".-1 ' 7- ENTER xi i EXIT . . VEH ID Q I Q2 Q3 Q4 Q5 Q6 NOTES - • . ,, , . - -,/ i ,.. ..- _.'/( ..-. n/ A If '. Ilk' Ai /ri; tlir q. It) I in Ill-/4 LAO IACK: \fr ..-r.., -.b- ." :t,) -'1 '1\i't ___,..., m • . . . . . H:\PROJECTS\TFLAFFICTEMPC&CSURVY.WPD ....„...... SURVEY QUESTIONS... 1. Where did your trip begin immediately prior to arriving here?(home,work...) Date: .4-7--9 2. Will you go back to your origin from here?(no-#3,yes-46) Initials: 3. Was this your primary destination?(no-#4,yes-#6) 4. Was it necessary to change your normal driving route?(no=Thank you!,yes-#5) Job Name: Cash&Carry 5. How far out of your way did you travel to get here?(Thank you!) Job Number: 194083.03 6. How far did you travel to get here?(Thank you!) Time Period: —..e"z_A--- ENTER I WI i l EXIT _ VEH ID Q1 _ Q2 Q3 Q4 Q5 Q6 NOTES 1 , ‘ , Li illlil '74t7 A L'--r• \ie.;-. >la fil i i• , t,-1 i..,).. iitm , _Dv i .:4-''' iNI A r I i, . ii 1 \I :,,:j 0. .11:!, \/cf, V 1 11 M /' ' • .. ,.•9 in 14.1 .',• '.- AJOLK \J '/ •,-; io rii ! V , • 1 ,, ki ,r-:. r:e vOtl• ' . . . Time Period: ?.•/6 — .?..1.3f1' :1 ! ENTER I_ EXIT 'p. VEH ID Q1 Q2 Q3 _ Q4 Q5 Q6 NOTES 7/1 IA 1 ,1 v.-, ‘AFt?' \iKL7r) 1 rti 1 -- _. . • P71 VV • , '-• .4. r.. V ki c.... ii)li Perio.fOn 'Al )f..;?. 1,1i;-:, ii • • . H4(,-.1..c• ;on:. p...1() 'I - 4 ;1 r ..-4 I.• ■ . ..- HAPROJECTSNTRAFFICTEMPT&CSURVY.WPD ..,..•:... . , SURVEY QUESTIONS... 1. Where did your trip begin immediately prior to arriving here?(home,work...) Date: -.5"-9 2. Will you go back to your origin from here?(no-#3,yes-#6) Initials: --7",-7; 3. Was this your primary destination?(no-#4,yes-#6) Location: .::,:" ;e/i--, 4. Was it necessary to change your normal driving route?(no=Thank you!,yes-#5) Job Name: Cash&Carry 5. How far out of your way did you travel to get here?(Thank you!) Job Number: 194083.03 6. How far did you travel to get here?(Thank you!) Time Period: 7.',,Id - ,e,•.-4- •. ENTER 1 EXIT VEH ID Q I Q2 , Q3 Q4 Q5 Q6 NOTES (4)11)12!118 1-10/16 Aid AI/ 0 '410 s ..r..i/ f/Ta .tei-ofti NO pi ) frio /0 nel., Time Period: .7'fr,.1 -- 17..2') ENTER I ./V J EXIT VEH ID _ Q I . Q2 Q3 Q4 Q5 Q6 NOTES . • 111 \A) .4. - \\/ ,.';; A , /61\J 1 '1 L01.1.C.''') AI OR 1' '1 /I' fp piq (i,i0 AM :J (1 -) , _ flii 4 Lk )414 ,,1 mit i /-s „--- )0r% \Nci ,, \l/.:::: s 1 //, • q II- Atl-i Vló t 1)‘', );.' I H:\PROJECTS\TRAFFIC,TEMPT&CSURVY.WPD . , SURVEY QUESTIONS... 1. Where did your trip begin immediately prior to arriving here?(home,work...) Date: 614.RG 2. Will you go back to your origin from here?(no-#3,yes-#6) Initials: 3. Was this your primary destination?(no-#4,yes-#6) Location:. .1.512/ MV 4. Was it necessary to change your normal driving route?(no=Thank you!,yes-#5) Job Name:Cash&Carry 5. How far out of your way did you travel to get here?(Thank you!) Job Number: 194083.03 6. How far did you travel to get here?(Thank you!) Time Period: '=.:1.") - I/ ENTER li-11- 1/ ) EXIT I 1.$e1 Fl I •... i VEH ID Q1 Q2 Q3 Q4 Q5 Q6 NOTES C_ Li v t IL. \I ,j r.:' -e 1'::: ,. . f.„-- , - • 7.1 .;,,,,,.. .1 ri int) , , i r i ,/ 7 t 0 r\,.-1- ?) r;:it ; 4 A '. r•I i\J f\) (.,1 ,, ti Iv „ , t i . , t i NJ Time Period: ENTER XI ! I EXIT VEH ID Q1 Q2 Q3 Q4 Q5 Q6 NOTES ,! t-: 1/ ,"i 7`. 41, -- __• • .,•••,..,,• 0 if 1 / 3 rvi rd -'f Ipi ri 14, I\ / I -.. HAPROJECTS\TRAFFIC\TEMP\C&CSURVY.WPD ;,..;'!.-..'" rtr';;;t--". . . SURVEY QUESTIONS... 1. Where did your trip begin immediately prior to arriving here?(home,work...) Date: 2. Will you go back to your origin from here?(no-#3,yes-#6) Initials: ri?N 3. Was this your primary destination?(no-#4,yes-#6) Location: G, Esl-tr1 \ 4. Was it necessary to change your normal driving route?(no=Thank you!,yes-#5) Job Name:Cash&Carry 5. How far out of your way did you travel to get here?(Thank you!) Job Number: 194083.03 6. How far did you travel to get here?(Thank you!) Time Period: q...ge j 47 ENTER 11,x' I EXIT .lK �I I VEH ID Q1 Q2 Q3 Q4 Q5 Q6 NOTES ■ Q. • . } — � `I re) .� r Time Period: - ENTER l r i t ' I EXIT 1) I VEH ID Q1 Q2 Q3 Q4 Q5 Q6 NOTES , ! A 1 1 (/ `d '`? < j u;. j , •• H:\PROJECTS\TRAFFIC\TEMP\C&CSURVY.WP D • SURVEY QUESTIONS... 1. Where did your trip begin immediately prior to arriving here?(home,work...) Date: 2. Will you go back to your origin from here?(no-#3,yes-#6) Initials: PA-44 3. Was this your primary destination?(no-#4,yes-46) Location:*f t.-;1-yri,),. 4. Was it necessary to change your normal driving route?(no=Thank you!,yes-45) Job Name:t ash&Carry 5. How far out of your way did you travel to get here?(Thank you!) Job Number 194083.03 6. How far did you travel to get here?(Thank you!) • Time Period: 1.) - ENTER Al 1111 EXIT I #4.t11 11\1 VEH ID Q1 Q2 Q3 Q4 Q5 Q6 NOTES 7- I )tie. r 0,/ 1\1 \/ 17; • • . N? - J / e , • Time Period: ENTER 1.,>\"1 Iti I EXIT Dehr X t VEH ID Q1 Q2 Q3 Q4 Q5 Q6 NOTES "- r • \/ ,.1 j• I ,7-1 : . \I .> re!! r yr r • HAPROJECTS\TRAFFICTEMP‘C&CSURVY.WPD • SURVEY QUESTIONS... 1. Where did your trip begin immediately prior to arriving here?(home,work...) Date: 2. Will you go back to your origin from here?(no-#3,yes-46) Initials: r:71 3. Was this your primary destination?(no-44,yes-46) Location: 4. Was it necessary to change your normal driving route?(no=Thank you!,yes-#5) Job Name:Cash&Carry 5. How far out of your way did you travel to get here?(Thank you!) Job Number: 194083.03 6. How far did you travel to get here?(Thank you!) Time Period: /d:- ENTER i1 1 i EXIT Pill VEH ID Ql Q2 Q3 Q4 Q5 Q6 NOTES 1\1 i i? r,. Time Period: - ENTER ";-‘,""r- I EXIT kr VEH ID Q 1 Q2 Q3 Q4 Q5 Q6 NOTES h N,iN 3 t, L 1 (I.-. lu' ?: i Ni y y„ ; V /1 .,, Wt.k \I _ { H:1PROIECTS\TRAFFIC1TEMP\C&CS URVY.WPD SURVEY QUESTIONS... 1. Where did your trip begin immediately prior to arriving here?(home,work...) Date: 2. Will you go back to your origin from here?(no-#3,yes-#6) Initials: V A LI 3. Was this your primary destination?(no-#4,yes-#6) Location: f.rief.74 s. 4. Was it necessary to change your normal driving route?(no=Thank you!,yes-#5) Job Name:Cash&Carry 5. How far out of your way did you travel to get here?(Thank you!) Job Number: 194083.03 6. How far did you travel to set here?(Thank you!) Time Period: !) / ENTER I ilk- It( EXIT 414-1-- I 1 VEH ID Q1 Q2 Q3 Q4 Q5 Q6 NOTES -V Y ''' . ."Ii , , W V • / t)• I ' •V‘ " i ei ' :-- ,: ,r ,, - :"\- iii rui. ■, 1, i r, / Time Period: •, - - ENTER .;`11 I EXIT VEH ID Q1 Q2 Q3 Q4 Q5 Q6 NOTES % f ........ ., , ) , , - ,T . . , , /, I% i i A `, ) ' i 1)y '=— . , HAPROIECTSTRAFFICTEMP1 C&CSURVY.WPD . .:1 -..-f...-":.-.--. ':.'''::="=-7 '.":.:', :=---''',•-'.''':.=,;-:;?::::..:',1.,-, SURVEY QUESTIONS... 1. Where did your trip begin immediately prior to arriving here?(home,work...) Date: 2. Will you go back to your origin from here?(no-#3,yes-#6) Initials: l P- 3. Was this your primary destination?(no-#4,yes-#.6) Location: •41;1_ ''Y.( 1 4. Was it necessary to change your normal driving route?(no=Thank you!,yes-#5) Job Name:Cash&Carry 5. How far out of your way did you travel to get here?(Thank you!) Job Number: 194083.03 6. How far did you travel to get here?(Thank you!) n, i, (15 Time Period: " ' I ENTER I % EXIT 11%1'''' i(11 L VEH ID Q I Q2 Q3 Q4 Q5 Q6 NOTES Time Period: _ •ENTER r' 1 \ ' I EXIT Jv VEH ID Q I Q2 Q3 Q4 Q5 Q6 NOTES H:\PR07ECTSITRAFFICITEMP\C&CSURVY.WPD , . . .. . , SURVEY QUESTIONS... 1. Where did your trip begin immediately prior to arriving here?(home,work...) Date: ...5--9--1,4 2. Will you go back to your origin from here?(no-#3,yes-#6) Initials: 77- , - 3. Was this your primary destination?(no-44,yes-#6) Location: 4-41 /749/72 4. Was it necessary to change your normal driving route?(no=Thank you!,yes-#5) Job Name:Cash&Carry 5. How far out of your way did you travel to get here?(Thank you!) Job Number: 194083.03 6. How far did you travel to get here?(Thank you!) Time Period: fa,.00 - ENTER .1,Kt 1 1 EXIT VEH ID Q I Q2 Q3 Q4 Q5 Q6 NOTES . . 1106 4 40 '.'‘.'r q. ,.c, v(1v )r1 „op r-rfiRze, i/iyrg, v#g -.all / I Pi 17,:: \APR '), IVCP _ 4i/71i / •1. 1,104-1 /Ab At: IVO 1.1.v E ':.'; •, 'Ai r-. e_11, \.../ '_=.. -401ri , _..•. ,.., • [ ■••• . : • 4;rorr.-L-, „ - Time Period: / '.1,:-.--/.,1,'.5d ENTER !j/V I EXIT VEH ID Q1 Q2 Q3 Q4 Q5 Q6 NOTES ‘j '"-: \Ai / y?-: .„ z._ ,),, -rirc<i(6, Afr-)t-:4 v :5c-. J.,..' , 117. \n ,) ev y' ;i. (--,b. ,, , - IIIII: cull,i .2.,Aiwtc,:(K, Al ) ,./ / 17 1//,' • ' (i(4 IT Iri 00 P.g. \/K3 ' 5n 1; l'AD \AO , qc, , Jp-, 01 f 1 H:\PROJECTS1TRAFFIC\TEMP.C&CSURVY.WPD SURVEY QUESTIONS... 1. Where did your trip begin immediately prior to arriving here?(home,work...) Date: ..1.-1—94 2. Will you go back to your origin from here?(no-#3,yes-#6) Initials: T 3. Was this your primary destination?(no-#4,yes-46) Location: ' ë3,4/,4ñ1., 4. Was it necessary to change your normal driving route?(no=Thank you!,yes-#5) Job Name:Cash&Carry 5. How far out of your way did you travel to get here?(Thank you!) Job Number: 194083.03 6. How far did you travel to get here?(Thank you!) Time Period: /o^•.,,O — /;. ;/S I ENTER i1.\11 I EXIT 1 VEH ID QI Q2 Q3 Q4 Q5 Q6 NOTES 4 V A)(7 ! 6 1110 Al 0 q��r,; Al ' .'4. \NO I.) \A'i C. 1,16/(c51) \noel) lyr), c Time Period: 1g••^/' —/,',/.. ENTER MI I EXIT 1 VEH ID Q1 Q2 Q3 Q4 Q5 Q6 NOTES i1 r / hl. :".:A T�� 0 16 y i-z it-, )? . ; 1 1 i P P ^i 1. \.A10�� \ t.�- Ai-m i ,• LL\IP ./.2,;(, WOE KIY, _ ^')rn• H:`,PROJECTS\TRAFFIC+TENIP\C&CSURVY.WPD SURVEY QUESTIONS... 1. Where did your trip begin immediately prior to arriving here?(home,work...) Date: 2. Will you go back to your origin from here?(no-#3,yes-#6) Initials: t? 3. Was this your primary destination?(no-#4,yes-#6) Location:;>, .,6:,;i i.4/yt 4. Was it necessary to change your normal driving route?(no=Thank you!,yes-#5) Job Name:Cash&Carry 5. How far out of your way did you travel to get here?(Thank you!) Job Number. 194083.03 6. How far did you travel to get here?(Thank you!) Time Period: /,',Ip— /,'/� ENTER )„,, l EXIT VEH ID Q1 Q2 Q3 Q4 Q5 Q6 NOTES Rt,l \,\JOP-.K VC iDrni RCV "1)(4 iOfl1c ;te_-='• ti 'e 1 wD K V ogt11 VC01 vs Y: Time Period: /.'/4- ENTER ' ,1'1 EXIT VEH ID Q1 Q2 Q3 Q4 Q5 Q6 NOTES 1,4 II)) POMO n,i(', V(,c 5"nii H.^,PROJECTS\TRAFFIC,TEMP\C&CSURVY.W PD SURVEY QUESTIONS... 1. Where did your trip begin immediately prior to arriving here?(home,work...) Date: r 9—s 2. Will you go back to your origin from here?(no-#3,yes-#6) Initials: tJ 3. Was this your primary destination?(no-#4,yes-#6) Location: :L-7._5//,4M 4. Was it necessary to change your normal driving route?(no=Thank you!,yes-#5) Job Name: Cash&Carry 5. How far out of your way did you travel to get here?(Thank you!) Job Number: 194083.03 6. How far did you travel to get here?(Thank you!) Time Period: /: ?!) - / :,1.5 I ENTER [J J.fl'f EXIT VEH ID Q I Q2 Q3 Q4 Q5 Q6 NOTES /rl■_ 1110 VI,U K.K., , ,5 51.2/1); `� f ?i l ,1! I-7.' \IV O K 3 �r _ I Time Period: /,',., - 'LV: ENTER I EXIT I �VEH/I�D Q1 Q2 _ Q3 Q4 Q5 Q6 NOTES ,, Il R6u S ID \ NOR>< Cik c /1 op S)(z ? [ J-ion1g eye. j m� H:\PROJECTS\TRAFFIC\TEMP\C&CSURVY.WPD SURVEY QUESTIONS... 1. Where did your trip begin immediately prior to arriving here?(home,work...) Date: j"-- q- 96, 2. Will you go back to your origin from here?(no-#3,yes-#6) Initials: -77"-.`e- --? 3. Was this your primary destination?(no-#4,yes-#6) Location: ,e51,r`� AJ,'/ 4. Was it necessary to change your normal driving route?(no=Thank you!,yes-#5) Job Name:Cash&Carry 5. How far out of your way did you travel to get here?(Thank you!) Job Number: 194083.03 6. How far did you travel to get here?(Thank you!) Time Period: 2;00 — 'f:, ENTER Al EXIT VEH ID Q1 Q2 Q3 _ Q4 Q5 Q6 NOTES 0 1)0 I)O A/0 P7 Ito Time Period: ^ • /1--- - ,' ENTER l ' EXIT VEH ID Q I Q2 Q3 Q4 Q5 Q6 NOTES 2,11 P -!, O( l gym. H:I PROJECTS\TRAFFIC\TEMP'C&CSURVY.WPD SURVEY QUESTIONS... 1. Where did your trip begin immediately prior to arriving here?(home,work...) Date: jj q- 96 2. Will you go back to your origin from here?(no-#3,yes-46) Initials: f , 3. Was this your primary destination?(no-44,yes-#6) Location:,'Ll4/YJ 4. Was it necessary to change your normal driving route?(no=Thank you!,yes-45) Job Name:Cash&Carry 5. How far out of your way did you travel to get here?(Thank you!) Job Number. 194083.03 6. How far did you travel to get here?(Thank you!) Time Period: .2.`36— f w5 r I ENTER X ( EXIT VEH ID Q1 Q2 Q3 Q4 . Q5 Q6 NOTES uSkI2�s Wove,, 10 cif),; Q1'1361) \]OEI, \/ _ arni sQc r),1 lAkevi yks (0 mi U u) i41 NI0U yC _ o2mi 02N LJS W e& 11\16 Af o 4/0 l2m Pm6a07 4o4t6 y,6 &III Time Period: ."y-.k< - ;Or) ENTER , ' I EXIT VEH ID Q1 Q2 Q3 Q4 Q5 Q6 NOTES r i' .? - ,. . . '', ;rr , - . -e - : t H:\PROJECTS\TRAFFIC\TE \C&CSURVY.WPD - SURVEY QUESTIONS... 1. Where did your trip begin immediately prior to arriving here?(home,work...) Date: 2. Will you go back to your origin from here?(no-#3,yes-#6) Initials: -1' 3. Was this your primary destination?(no-#4,yes-#6) Location: ;T- 4. Was it necessary to change your normal driving route?(no=Thank you!,yes-#5) Job Name:Cash&Carry 5. How far out of your way did you travel to get here?(Thank you!) Job Number: 194083.03 6. How far did you travel to get here?(Thank you!) Time Period: .3 ENTER I! ' ( EXIT [ 1r VEH ID Q1 Q2 Q3 _ Q4 Q5 Q6 _ NOTES t i i y/'.: if A Time Period: ENTER i1.4.1- I I EXIT ' ~ I • VEH ID Q1 Q2 Q3 Q4 Q5 Q6 NOTES /77 fjnolt H:(PROJECTS\TRAFFIC\TEMPIC&CSURVY.WPD SURVEY QUESTIONS... 1. Where did your trip begin immediately prior to arriving here?(home,work...) Date: 2. Will you go back to your origin from here?(no-#3,yes-#6) Initials: RI 3. Was this your primary destination?(no-#4,yes-46) Location:&465 i+/%ir 4. Was it necessary to change your normal driving route?(no=Thank you!,yes-#5) Job Name:Cash&Carry 5. How far out of your way did you travel to get here?(Thank you!) Job Number: 194083.03 6. How far did you travel to get here?(Thank you!) Time Period: •-•-• • ENTER ).. .1 I I EXIT 1-)(1f VEH ID QI Q2 Q3 Q4 Q5 Q6 NOTES 3 IL 31:;.(' tri '11 ( • j Kr • • Time Period: I EXIT 1, ENTER 1.;-1-f VEH ID Q I Q2 Q3 Q4 Q5 Q6 NOTES • - is I r 1 r•IY. ti r . )• HAPROJECTS\TRAFFIC1TEMP\C&CSURVY.WPD • SURVEY QUESTIONS... 1. Where did your trip begin immediately prior to arriving here?(home,work...) Date: 2. Will you go back to your origin from here?(no-#3,yes-#6) Initials: J4- 3. Was this your primary destination?(no-#4,yes-#6) Location:��r3 ^� 4. Was it necessary to change your normal driving route?(no=Thank you!,yes-45) Job Name:Cash&Carry 5. How far out of your way did you travel to get here?(Thank you!) Job Number: 194083.03 6. How far did you travel to get here?(Thank you!) Time Period: ..t f 0 ENTER /f (.! EXIT ,H-T1 7 VEH ID Q 1 Q2 Q3 Q4 Q5 Q6 NOTES iii fi ,i ,, ;, y r:' J/` I/ Time Period: - ENTER " ! 1 I EXIT i VEH ID QI Q2 Q3 Q4 Q5 Q6 NOTES • .Jf • , / • I 7:41' , t-,1 nj H:\PROJECTS1TRAFFICITEMP\C&CSURVY.WPD • SURVEY QUESTIONS... 1. Where did your trip begin immediately prior to arriving here?(home,work...) Date: 2. Will you go back to your origin from here?(no-#3,yes-#6) Initials: F7I-P- 3. Was this your primary destination?(no-#4,yes-#6) Location: 4. Was it necessary to change your normal driving route?(no=Thank you!,yes-#5) Job Name:Cash&Carry 5. How far out of your way did you travel to get here?(Thank you!) Job Number: 194083.03 6. How far did you travel to get here?(Thank you!) .70 Time Period: u. ENTER 114-r? .14-1- EXIT D''re Jill 1 VEH ID Q 1 Q2 _Q3 Q4 Q5 Q6 NOTES 1", 0-1 . • - /, e„ I i P-1 t% )• ,. 1\,-) Time Period: - ENTER EXIT ! • VEH ID Q1 Q2 Q3 Q4 Q5 Q6 NOTES •-• H:\PROJECTSURAFFICTEMP\C&CSURVY.WPD SURVEY QUESTIONS... 1. Where did your trip begin immediately prior to arriving here?(home,work...) Date: 2. Will you go back to your origin from here?(no-#3,yes-#6) Initials: 3. Was this your primary destination?(no-#4,yes-#6) Location: ,;:7r; F '.. 4. Was it necessary to change your normal driving route?(no=Thank you!,yes-#5) Job Name:Cash&Carry 5. How far out of your way did you travel to get here?(Thank you!) Job Number: 194083.03 6. How far did you travel to get here?(Thank you!) Time Period: 5 =' 5 ,_. ENTER I EXIT VEH ID Q1 Q2 Q3 Q4 Q5 Q6 NOTES r;.!f 71.0 Time Period: ENTER I EXIT VEH ID I QI Q3 Q3 Q4 Q5 Q6 NOTES H:\PROJECTSITRAFFICITEMPIC&CSURVY.WPD • CLACKAMAS CASH AND CARRY SURVEY QUESTIONS... 1. Where did your trip begin immediately prior to arriving here?(home,work...) Date: S/fd 2. Will you go back to your origin from here?(no-#3,yes-#6) Initials: rig 1-1 3. Was this your primary destination?(no-#4,yes-#6) Location: /,'la i:C!;l.%!%IS 4. Was it necessary to change your normal driving route?(no=Thank you!,yes-#5) Job Name:Cash&Carry 5. How far out of your way did you travel to get here?(Thank you!) Job Number: 194083.03 6. How far did you travel to get here?(Thank you!) i,;ii , Time Period: ENTER EXIT • VEH ID QI Q2 Q3 Q4 Q5 Q6 NOTES 7i Time Period: - ENTER I EXIT VEH ID Q1 Q2 Q3 Q4 Q5 Q6 NOTES H:IPROJECTS\TRAFFIC\TEMP\C&CSLR VY.WP D SURVEY QUESTIONS... 1. Where did your trip begin immediately prior to arriving here?(home, work...) Date: S/lo 2. Will you go back to your origin from here?(no-#3,yes-#6) Initials: gyp,t! 3. Was this your primary destination?(no-#4,yes-#6) Location: 4. Was it necessary to change your normal driving route?(no=Thank you!,yes-#5) Job Name:Cash&Carry 5. How far out of your way did you travel to get here?(Thank you!) Job Number: 194083.03 6. How far did you travel to get here?(Thank you!) Time Period: '7.1� ENTER // EXIT / VEH ID QI Q2 Q3 Q4 Q5 Q6 NOTES / , Time Period: '\ ENTER J111. I EXIT VEH ID Ql Q2 Q3 pp Q4 Q5 Q6 NOTES • j ' ai t I,/ by H 6y I, #1'11'? H:\PROJECTS\TRAFFIC1TEMP\C&CSURVY.WPD SURVEY QUESTIONS... 1. Where did your trip begin immediately prior to arriving here?(home,work...) Date: =j %" 2. Will you go back to your origin from here?(no-#3,yes-#6) Initials: E/-fl 3. Was this your primary destination?(no-#4,yes-#6) Location: -7iu 4. Was it necessary to change your normal driving route?(no=Thank you!,yes-#5) Job Name: Cash&Carry 5. How far out of your way did you travel to get here?(Thank you!) Job Number: 194083.03 6. How far did you travel to get here?(Thank you!) • Time Period: ')- ENTER r 1 EXIT , J VEH ID Q I Q2 Q3 Q4 Q5 Q6 NOTES 1`iff� ,`i i I ;1 a.' 1T . 11_ q r Time Period: - ENTER !�1-% 1 I EXIT VEH ID Ql Q2 Q3 Q4 Q5 Q6 NOTES V - y;r y`J n V 1/ f) ,,lr - r r'! {n o rr) 7� 14 H:\PROJECTS\TR4.FFIC\TEMP\C&CSURVY.WPD SURVEY QUESTIONS... 1. Where did your trip begin immediately prior to arriving here?(home,work...) Date: //o 2. Will you go back to your origin from here?(no-#3,yes-46) Initials: e 3. Was this your primary destination?(no-#4,yes-#6) Location: C.)-?i-:;•1 i '2 S 4. Was it necessary to change your normal driving route?(no=Thank you!,yes-#5) Job Name: Cash&Carry 5. How far out of your way did you travel to get here?(Thank you!) Job Number: 194083.03 6. How far did you travel to get here?(Thank you!) Time Period: e.;:00- *- ENTER ! I EXIT VEH ID Q1 Q2 Q3 Q4 Q5 Q6 NOTES Time Period: ENTER , I I !l 1 EXIT ;1. VEH ID Q1 Q2 Q3 Q4 Q5 I Q6 NOTES C i t • • H:\PROJ£CTSITR4.FFIC\TEMP\C&CSURVY.WPD 11 SURVEY QUESTIONS... 1. Where did your trip begin immediately prior to arriving here?(home,work...) Date: Via 2. Will you go back to your origin from here?(no-#3,yes-#6) Initials: EA- 3. Was this your primary destination?(no-#4,yes-#6) Location: e 4. Was it necessary to change your normal driving route?(no=Thank you!,yes-#5) Job Name:Cash&Carry 5. How far out of your way did you travel to get here?(Thank you!) Job Number. 194083.03 6. How far did you travel to get here?(Thank you!) • • Time Period: er .):(:- 6:4C ENTER ,1.1-41- 1,111-t- EXIT ,,W1 VEH ID Q1 Q2 , Q3 Q4 Q5 Q6 NOTES - / • 'Ili ll 0-1 PI YV; tl ;NI 1\I ki • Time Period: - ENTER x- Al 111 I EXIT VEH ID Qi Q2 Q3 Q4 Q5 Q6 NOTES ,/ - ri-K I •?. c, ! Cal 3 y \j ''/ -7 ).?-4- r'171, k 0 1/10-1 • HAPROJECTS\TRAFFICTEMM&CSURVY.WM 54\P) * , • • SURVEY QUESTIONS... 1. Where did your trip begin immediately prior to arriving here?(home,work...) Date: 47/:1 2. Will you go back to your origin from here?(no-#3,yes-#6) Initials: FP H 3. Was this your primary destination?(no-#4,yes-#6) Location: (1,15i 4. Was it necessary to change your normal driving route?(no=Thank you!,yes-#5) Job Name:Cash&Carry 5. How far out of your way did you travel to get here?(Thank you!) Job Number: 194083.03 6. How far did you travel to get here?(Thank you!) • Time Period: 4•;)- ENTER (I i( EXIT Alf I • • VEH ID Q1 Q2 Q3 Q4 Q5 Q6 NOTES ; - • • 1 -- f-fJ A/ r• 1,1 )1\i (17 Time Period: '4 - ENTER -1-K• • I EXIT VH ID Q1 Q2 Q3 Q4 Q5 Q6 NOTES • •y • aii fti Pfrk.,,4.- . ! /a .crd \A 0 V ;? /),!, , yit) ut,k • HAPROIECTS\TRAFFICITEMP\C&CSURVY.WPD 1$ CZt qk:A• . • . . - • • • . • SURVEY QUESTIONS... 1. Where did your trip begin immediately prior to arriving here?(home,work...) Date: 5/ 2. Will you go back to your origin from here?(no-#3,yes-#6) Initials: ER• H 3. Was this your primary destination?(no-#4,yes-#6) Location: ('"(,a_Cko.i ac 4. Was it necessary to change your normal driving route?(no=Thank you!,yes-#5) Job Name:Cash&Carry 5. How far out of your way did you travel to get here?(Thank you!) Job Number: 194083.03 6. How far did you travel to get here?(Thank you!) • Time Period: "1•=,•' ? •''S ENTER jf' W11 EXIT ' 1 VEH ID Q1 Q2 Q3 Q4 Q5 Q6 NOTES r3! Gn / 1.6 rr-Z ► V 5 ro v, Time Period: • ENTER EXIT 1'`1 VtH ID Q 1 I Q2 Q3 Q4 Q5 Q6 NOTES of y�� ,7p 7117.. � :r ',\I L 1 / 5 r,. • H:I PROJECTS ITRAFFIC\TEMP\C8:CSURVY.WPD i \.:k'4"1-4 `-4 SURVEY QUESTIONS... 1. Where did your trip begin immediately prior to arriving here?(home,work...) Date: 15//a 2. Will you go back to your origin from here?(no-#3,yes-#6) Initials: 67, 3. Was this your primary destination?(no-#4,yes-#6) • Location: "t4i fik A.E.A.1,15 4. Was it necessary to change your normal driving route?(no=Thank you!,yes-#5) Job Name:Cash&Carry 5. How far out of your way did you travel to get here?(Thank you!) Job Number: 194083.03 6. How far did you travel to get here?(Thank you!) • Time Period: ! 1 . ENTER Le III EXIT % VEH ID Q1 Q2 Q3 Q4 Q5 Q6 NOTES jc' I-1 (.r 1- e • A f\J -2 Ali f-.;!- • pC Time Period: :• ENTER .4/ I EXIT VEH ID Q I Q2 Q3 Q4 Q5 Q6 NOTES Ps; r - r•-, • - W OIZZ , ) r• HAPROIECTSTRAFFICYTEMPT&CSURVY.WPD a-A •" . , . . • - • SURVEY QUESTIONS... I. Where did your nip begin immediately prior to arriving here?(home,work...) Date: L5710 2. Will you go back to your origin from here?(no-#3,yes-#6) Initials: £7 I-% 3. Was this your primary destination?(no-#4,yes-#6) Location: 4. Was it necessary to change your normal driving route?(no=Thank you!,yes-#5) Job Name:Cash&Carry 5. How far out of your way did you travel to get here?(Thank you!) Job Number: 194083.03 6. How far did you travel to get here?(Thank you!) • • Time Period: /0: 99 - ENTER Ler/ EXIT jiiir h Val ID Q 1 Q2 _Q3 Q4 Q5 Q6 _ NOTES 1,1/1 :10.../ IN/51 1<._ t /21/. YJ 5c'. • Time Period: • ' • ENTER j)--r $ EXIT VEH ID Qi Q2 Q3 Q4 Q5 Q6 NOTES 12, — (.;;./ 1,1 , \ • 1\1 1\-1 • 0-1) V 0 , ( s.I ryi, I.4 - 41,-)ritt N HAPROIECTS\TRAFFICTEMPT&CSURVY.WPD LoY5 ■-1 . . SURVEY QUESTIONS... 1. Where did your trip begin immediately prior to arriving here?(home,work...) Date: ''S/' 2. Will you go back to your origin from here?(no-43,yes-46) Initials: 3. Was this your primary destination?(no-#4,yes-46) Location: 1/".^,;-'j.' ' 4. Was it necessary to change your normal driving route?(no=Thank you!,yes-45) Job Name:Cash&Carry 5. How far out of your way did you travel to get here?(Thank you!) Job Number: 194083.03 6. How far did you travel to get here?(Thank you!) Time Period: '/ 0 - '' ENTER EXIT )7 i J-Fir VEH ID Ql I Q2 Q3 Q4 Q5 Q6 NOTES • ; /;.L !/.1/ sir � Time Period: ENTER ice` I EXIT V1=H ID Q: Q2 Q3 Q4 Q5 Q6 NOTES • H:\PROJECTS\TRAFFICTEMP\C&CSURVY.WPD SURVEY QUESTIONS... — 1. Where did your trip begin immediately prior to arriving here?(home,work...) Date: 2. Will you go back to your origin from here?(no-43,yes-46) Initials: 3. Was this your primary destination?(no-44,yes-46) Location: ;.1'7 4. Was it necessary to change your normal driving route?(no=Thank you!,yes-45) Job Name: Cash&Carry 5. How far out of your way did you travel to get here?(Thank you!) Job Number: 194083.03 6. How far did you travel to get here?(Thank you!) Time Period: /' '2;- 0-7 ENTER EXIT N . VEH ID Ql Q2 Q3 Q4 Q5 Q6 NOTES )1U 1 Pr f\A:In 1\3 12 Time Period: 1 ENTER i* -1 \, I EXIT NI, \ VEH ID Qi Q2 Q3 Q4 Q5 Q6 NOTES citcLu`i • • • H:\P ROJE CTS TRAFFICTE C SUR VY.WP D SURVEY QUESTIONS... 1. Where did your trip begin immediately prior to arriving here?(home,work...) Date: 2. Will you go back to your origin from here?(no-#3,yes-#6) Initials: 3. Was this your primary destination?(no-#4,yes-#6) Location: 4. Was it necessary to change your normal driving route?(no=Thank you!,yes-#5) Job Name:Cash&Carry 5. How far out of your way did you travel to get here?(Thank you!) Job Number: 194083.03 6. How far did you travel to get here?(Thank you!) Time Period: I2 1 ENTER ITAklikk, EXIT �(I VEH ID Q1 Q? Q3 Q4 Q5 Q6 NOTES !J • Time Period: ENTER ' lllt I EXIT '114,-1--..11-4 11 VEH ID Ql Q2 Q3 Q4 Q5 Q6 NOTES • . i H:\P ROJECTSI TRAFFIC\TEMP\C&CSURVY.WP D SURVEY QUESTIONS... 1. Where did your trip begin immediately prior to arriving here?(home,work...) Date: 2. Will you go back to your origin from here?(no-43, yes-46) Initials: 3. Was this your primary destination?(no-#4,yes-46) Location: -?!,),'T,F1.5;>00 4. Was it necessary to change your normal driving route?(no=Thank you!,yes-45) Job Name: Cash&Carry 5. How far out of your way did you travel to get here?(Thank you!) Job Number: 194083.03 6. How far did you travel to get here?(Thank you!) Time Period: /2... - ENTER Ilk& - EXIT 1, VEH ID Ql Q2 Q3 Q4 Q5 Q6 NOTES A c Time Period: • ENTER itk, ('t{}_ I EXIT ))VEH ID Q l Q2 Q3 Q4 Q5 Q6 NOTES \r\Q-,, - 7Z---/„.,f' H:I PROJECTSITRAFFIC\TEMPIC&CSURVY.WPD SURVEY QUESTIONS... 1. Where did your trip begin immediately prior to arriving here?(home,work...) Date: 5-7 6 2. Will you go back to your origin from here?(no-#3, yes-:6) Initials: 3. Was this your primary destination?(no-n4,yes-#6) Location: /1.:i 4. Was it necessary to change your normal driving route?(no=Thank you!,yes-45) Job Name:Cash&Carry 5. How far out of your way did you travel to get here?(Thank you!) Job Number: 194083.03 6. How far did you travel to get here?(Thank you!) Time Period: /- I ENTER It EXIT VEH ID Q I Q2 Q3 Q4 Q5 Q6 NOTES r t.1 _ frxr+) � rY+cal • Time Period: ENTER i I EXIT f, VEH ID Q I Q2 Q3 Q4 Q5 Q6 NOTES I H:\PROJECTS\TRAFFIC\TEMP\C&CSURVY.WPD SURVEY QUESTIONS... 1. Where did your trip begin immediately prior to arriving here?(home,work...) Date: 2. Will you go back to your origin from here?(no-43, yes-#6) Initials: 3. Was this your primary destination?(no- 4,yes-46) Location: !'%a•k o I,'a'5 4. Was it necessary to change your normal driving route?(no=Thank you!,yes-45) Job Name: Cash&Carry 5. How far out of your way did you travel to get here?(Thank you!) Job Number: 194083.03 6. How far did you travel to get here?(Thank you!) Time Period: !: ^7 r ENTER 1 EXIT N VEH ID Q1 Q2 Q3 Q4 Q5 Q6 NOTES 4 wAr : Time Period: ENTER I EXIT yi VEH ID Q 1 Q2 Q3 Q4 Q5 Q6 NOTES \ ; Vii' •'1 n ,i�i /r( /. r • H:\PROJECTS\TRAFFICITEMP\C&CSURVY.WPD I i SURVEY QUESTIONS... 1. Where did your trip begin immediately prior to arriving here?(home,work...) Date: 511 u 2. Will you go back to your origin from here?(no-43,yes-#6) Initials: Elt 3. Was this your primary destination?(no-#4,yes-#6) Location: CI.0 Vr 0.MA c 4. Was it necessary to change your normal driving route?(no=Thank you!,yes-#5) Job Name:Cash&Carry 5. How far out of your way did you travel to get here?(Thank you!) Job Number. 194083.03 6. How far did you travel to get here?(Thank you!) Time Period: -" ' 4:/5( ENTER 1( EXIT VEH ID Q1 Q2 _ Q3 Q4 Q5 Q6 NOTES 1 /) - 4Vi,Y1C Ni• �f V 17 rill r f • Time Period: • ENTER I I EXIT VEH ID Q1 Q2 Q3 Q4 Q5 Q6 NOTES • H:\PROTECTS\TRAFFIC\TEMP\C&CSURVY.WPD �l SURVEY QUESTIONS... 1. Where did your trip begin immediately prior to arriving here?(home,work...) Date: 5//o 2. Will you go back to your origin from here?(no-43,yes-#6) Initials: CA-k' 3. Was this your primary destination?(no-#4,yes-#6) Location: !:LctC ka /1:<.1s 4. Was it necessary to change your normal driving route?(no=Thank you!,yes-#5) Job Name:Cash&Carry 5. How far out of your way did you travel to get here?(Thank you!) Job Number: 194083.03 6. How far did you travel to get here?(Thank you!) Time Period: ,/,':^0 - =' +1l ENTER 14 1 EXIT I I I 1 VEH ID Ql Q2 Q3 Q4 Q5 Q6 NOTES • y ri.,/ Time Period: =' • ENTER krr {+)1 EXIT i VEH ID Q1 _ Q2 Q3 Q4 Q5 Q6 NOTES G, .1? • hi Z. N (,\/ HA PROJECTS\TRAFFIC\TEMP\CBCSURVY.WPD (22 • I SURVEY QUESTIONS... 1. Where did your trip begin immediately prior to arriving here?(home,work...) Date: 2. Will you go back to your origin from here?(no-#3,yes-46) Initials: E-Ftt 3. Was this your primary destination?(no-#4,yes-46) Location: 11 4. Was it necessary to change your normal driving route?(no=Thank you!,yes-45) Job Name:Cash&Carry 5. How far out of your way did you travel to get here?(Thank you!) Job Number: 194083.03 6. How far did you travel to get here?(Thank you!) Time Period: .2 S ENTER --Hir EXIT .41-- VEH ID Q 1 Q2 Q3 Q4 Q5 Q6 I NOTES f - . . I J.- A L./ 6A■ ‘LA ., • )0( 1/ SOP V v /1 , t (i • 1;,•\ ak V Time Period: L - • ENTER j.411.-.. / 11 EXIT VEH ID Q1 Q2 Q3 Q4 Q5 Q6 NOTES ' • , I •C‘i \ ;•'':/1 \ / fiFkii 11,0 w ) /I) /ICI• • ..•• . H:\PROIECTS\TRAFF1C1TEMP\C&CSURVY.WPD r C , . . .. . . _ . . . . , • • SURVEY QUESTIONS... 1. Where did your trip begin immediately prior to arriving here?(home,work...) Date: 51/0 2. Will you go back to your origin from here?(no-#3,yes-146) Initials: P:7,-1-* 3. Was this your primary destination?(no-#4,yes-#6) Location: :1 i 4. Was it necessary to change your normal driving route?(no=Thank you!,yes-#5) Job Name:Cash&Carry 5. How far out of your way did you travel to get here?(Thank you!) Job Number: 194083.03 6. How far did you travel to get here?(Thank you!) Time Period: -••:- -7-.?• ENTER 11)1 EXIT 1 VEH ID Q1 Q2 Q3 Q4 Q5 Q6 NOTES •.61 h1,1.:- „ . i • Time Period: "1. ' • ENTER j..1-11 1 \ I EXIT .1...1,4-r I V EH ID Q1 Q2 Q3 Q4 Q5 Q6 NOTES ki • • ; trA/ id W ti (ay ki 1-1) I / 1%1 N NJ t\) • HAPROJECTSVCRAFFIC\TEMP\C&CSURVY.WPD l'Yji • • • • SURVEY QUESTIONS... 1. Where did your trip begin immediately prior to arriving here?(home,work...) Date: .5// 2. Will you go back to your origin from here?(no-43,yes-46) Initials: el' 3. Was this your primary destination?(no-44,yes-46) Location: tiro'k'ure. 4. Was it necessary to change your normal driving route?(no=Thank you!,yes-45) Job Name:Cash&Carry 5. How far out of your way did you travel to get here?(Thank you!) Job Number: 194083.03 6. How far did you travel to get here?(Thank you!) Time Period: '')') ENTER { ' I EXIT ! VEH ID •1r Q2 Q3 Q4 Q5 Q6 NOTES Time Period: ENTER +'" ` EXIT r / ( I VT✓H ID Ql Q2 Q3 Q4 Q5 Q6 NOTES is 1 4 l r r� +/C t / ' I. H:1 PR01ECTS1TR4FFICITEMPIC&CSURVY.WPD • • SURVEY QUESTIONS... 1. Where did your trip begin immediately prior to arriving here?(home,work...) Date: 5/is 2. Will you go back to your origin from here?(no-#3,yes-46) Initials: 6?-rl 3. Was this your primary destination?(no-#4,yes-46) Location:;1 1 <r rx 4. Was it necessary to change your normal driving route?(no=Thank you!,yes-45) Job Name:Cash&Carry 5. How far out of your way did you travel to get here?(Thank you!) Job Number: 194083.03 6. How far did you travel to get here?(Thank you!) Time Period: 1, ENTER EXIT I VEH ID Ql Q2 Q3 Q4 Q5 Q6 NOTES r _• r' lv r ,,// ,l, ' r • _ I 1 Time Period: - ' ENTER / 1 J I EXIT 14, ( % I VEH ID Q1 Q2 Q3 Q4 Q5 Q6 I NOTES H:\PROJECTS\TRAFFICTEMP\C&CSURVY.WPD •" 'ai: SURVEY QUESTIONS... 1. Where did your trip begin immediately prior to arriving here?(home,work...) Date: S7/() 2. Will you go back to your origin from here?(no-#3,yes-#6) Initials: 7\ 3. Was this your primary destination?(no-#4,yes-#6) Location: ,11ar_' ;rz 4. Was it necessary to change your normal driving route?(no=Thank you!,yes-#5) Job Name: Cash&Carry 5. How far out of your way did you travel to get here?(Thank you!) Job Number: 194083.03 6. How far did you travel to get here?(Thank you!) Time Period: 6". co - 5 i 5 ENTER EXIT f I VEH ID Q1 Q2 Q3 Q4 Q5 Q6 NOTES • Time Period: -- ENTER l EXIT VEH ID Q1 Q2 Q3 Q4 Q5 Q6 NOTES t\ H:\PROJECTS\TRAFFIC\TEMP\C&CS URVY.WPD • 2/18/03 conditions Associated With 11:12:43AM TIDEMARK Case #: SDR2002-00017 COMPUTER SYSTEMS, INC, Condition Status Updated Code Title Hold Status Changed By Tag Date By 1 PEDESTRIAN ACCESS EASEMENT None Met 2/11/03 MET 2/11/03 MET 1 1 PEDESTRIAN ROUTE LIGHTING None Met 2/11/03 MET 2/11/03 MET 2 1 RECIPROCAL EASEMENTNEHICLE CONN None Met 2/11/03 MET 2/11/03 MET 3 1 BICYCLE PARKING STALLS None Met 2/11/03 MET 2/11/03 MET 4 1 SUITE LAYOUT MAP None Met 2/11/03 BDR 2/11/03 MET 5 Page 1 of 1 CaseConditions..ipt — Monaghan Farms, Inc. RECEIVED PLANNING 14120 East Evans Avenue,Aurora, CO 80014 Telephone (303) 743-0100 FEB 1 0 2003 Fax(303) 743-0202 CITY OF TIGARD February 7, 2003 City of Tigard Attn: Mr. Morgan Tracy Planning Department 13125 SW Hall Blvd. Tigard, OR 97224 Re: Decision on Site Development Review (SDR) 2002-00017 Cash and Carry Stores Dear Mr. Tracy: I am writing with regard to your Conditions of Approval, Nos. 1, 2 and 3. With regard to item No. 1, under separate cover, we will forward a Pedestrian Access Easement for Recording with the County of Washington, State of Oregon. The terms of the easement shall be as set forth in your Condition of Approval No. 1. With regard to Item No. 2, it is my understanding after speaking with you that the lighting requirement shall be reviewed by the City, at such time as the pedestrian access is actually constructed. Accordingly, it is my understanding that there is no action needed to be taken by the Applicant or Owner at this time. If my understanding is not correct, please contact me immediately. With regard to Condition of Approval No. 3, please consider this letter acknowledgement that Monaghan Farms, Inc., as Owner of the subject property accepts your condition which requires that if ODOT approves a vehicular connection between the subject property and the property to the north, the two properties shall provide reciprocal easements and construct a vehicular easement when the property to the north develops. This acceptance to subject to reasonable compensation, reasonable location of the easement, construction of improvements by the neighboring landowner, and acceptance by our Tenant. It is my understanding that Conditions of Approval, Items No. 4 and 5 have been satisfied by the Applicant or are being satisfied by the Applicant, Cash and Carry Stores. It is our hope that you can issue a Certificate of Occupancy, immediately, to Cash and Carry Stores, in order that they may commence business operations. ANL Mr. Morgan Tracy City of Tigard February 7, 2003 Page Two If you have any questions or if there are any Conditions of Approval which you do not believe have been satisfied, please contact me immediately. Sincerely, I Thomas C. Deline Vice President TCD/ma cc: Smart & Final Oregon, Inc. - 1Ington County,Oregon 200320020 .. 112003 09:29:03 AM D•E Cnt■1 Stn•21 RECORDB1 Owner: $15.00$6.00$11.00•Total•$32.00 Monaghan Farms, Inc. 14120 East Evans Avenue, Aurora, CO 80014 MI 0025990220030020020003003 s I,Jerry Hanson,Director of A merit and Taxation c . Return Address: and Ex-Officio County Clerk for Washington County, Oregon,do hereby certify that the within Instrument of writing was received and recorded inith•book of • .i records of said county. �� Monaghan Farms, Inc. Jerry R.Hanson,Director mint and Taxation, 14120 E. Evans Ave. Ex-Officio County Clerk Aurora, CO 80014 (RECORDING INFORMATION ABOVE) EASEMENT AGREEMENT Grantor is the Owner of the real property described on attached Exhibit "A" ("Grantor's Property"). The undersigned Grantor for and in consideration of other good and valuable consideration, the receipt whereof is hereby acknowledged, does hereby grant and convey unto the real property identified by the City of Tigard as "abutting C-P zoned property to the North (presently described as WCTM 1S136CD, Tax Lots 401, 500, 1002).", hereinafter referred to as "Grantee," a nonexclusive easement to construct and maintain, at Grantee's sole cost and expense, and subject to review and approval by Grantor of all facilities to be constructed, a walkway with fence and gate on Grantor's Property Line for use as a pedestrian and bicycle access, from time to time, as Grantee may require upon, over, under and across the Land which is an eight foot (8') strip over a portion of Grantor's Property. Said easement includes the right of periodic ingress and egress over the eight foot strip of land to construct, and maintain such pedestrian and bicycle easement, Grantor, its successors, assigns, lessees, licensees, and agents retain the right to close this access; however, it shall remain open while business is being conducted on the Grantor's property during normal business hours. Grantee shall indemnify Grantor for all damages caused to Grantor to the extent of Grantee's or Grantee's successors, assigns, agents, lessees, invitees, and guests negligent exercise of the rights and privileges herein granted. Grantor reserves the right to occupy, use and cultivate said easement for all purposes not inconsistent with the rights herein granted. Such rights include the right to install curbs, gutters, driveways, landscaping, a sprinkler system and light poles. If Grantee damages any landscaping or sprinkler lines or facilities, Grantee will promptly repair any damage or replace damaged landscaping or sprinkler lines or facilities. This easement shall only become effective and Grantee may only utilize the Easement at such time as the Grantee is approved by the City of Tigard for redevelopment of the Grantee property from its use as it exists on the date of recording of this Agreement. In the event that Grantee does not receive approval for redevelopment of the Grantee Property by the City of Tigard, within three (3) calendar years of the date of-recording of this Agreement, this Easement Agreement shall terminate. The rights, conditions and provisions of this easement shall inure to the benefit of and be binding upon the heirs, executors, administrators, successors and assigns of the respective parties hereto. Page 1 of 2 2003-20020 (RECORDING INFORMATION ABOVE) Dated this 7 day of f. 51ea v.a y 2003. Grantor: Monaghan Farms, Inc. Attest: By: Title: / Ga 4)6-31-`2"47-- STATE OF COLORADO ) ss. COUNTY OF ARAPAHOE ) The ore oin instrument was acknowledged before me this 7 day of ,s , 2003, by . P//y-7 , as Vice President of Monaghan Farms, Inc., a Colorado corporation on behal of the corporation. / ■ /Notary ' blic My commission expires: ?-%�- �ZOD.3 [SEAL] . City Of Tigard Moan Tracy /, AFTER RECORDING PLEASE RETURN TO: zU` wr... T .. Monaghan Farms, Inc. 14120 East Evans Ave. Aurora, CO 80014 Page 2 of 2 • BEING U. ATED IN A PORT1C OF THE SE 1 /4 OF THE SW 1 /4 OF SECTION 36, T. 1 S., R.1 W., W.M. IN THE CITY OF TIGARD, WASHINGTON COUNTY, OREGON GRANTOR'S PROPERTY LEGAL DESCRIPTION A TRACT OF LAND IN THE SOUTHEAST ONE-QUARTER OF THE SOUTHWEST ONE- QUARTER OF SECT1ON 36, TOWNSHIP 1 SOUTH, RANGE 1 WEST, OF THE WILLAMETTE MERIDIAN, BEING MORE PARTICULARLY DESCRIBED AS FOLLOWS: BEGINNING AT A 5/8 INCH IRON ROD WITH YELLOW PLASTIC CAP INSCRIBED 'W.8. WELLS' AT THE SOUTHWEST CORNER OF THAT TRACT OF LAND DESCRIBED AS PARCEL II IN DEED DOCUMENT NO. S0--31286 RECORDED AT THE WASHINGTON COUNTY DEED RECORDS; THENCE NORTH 13'20'54" WEST ALONG THE WEST UNE OF SAID DESCRIBED PARCEL II, 323.06 FEET TO A 5/8 INCH IRON ROD WITH YELLOW PLASTIC CAP INSCRIBED "G & L PLS 1989'; THENCE SOUTH 89'29'57" EAST LEAVING SAID WEST UNE. 316.24 FEET TO A 5/8 INCH IRON ROD WITH YELLOW PLASTIC CAP INSCRIBED 'G & L PLS 1988; THENCE NORTH 00'22'56" WEST 27.00 FEET TO A POINT; THENCE SOUTH 6929'57' EAST 130.03 FEET TO A POINT; THENCE SOUTH 0'22'56" EAST 121,69 FEET TO A 5/6 INCH IRON ROO WITH rr.. YELLOW PLASTIC CAP INSCRIBED G Ic L PLS 1909 ; • THENCE SOUTH 58'34'09' WEST, 49.05 FEET TO A 5/8 INCH IRON ROD 1MTH YELLOW PLASTIC CAP INSCRIBED "G & L PLS 1989"; THENCE NORTH 8917'21' WEST, 42.03 FEET TO A 3/4 INCH IRON PIPE; THENCE SOUTH 2'34'00' EAST, 185.12 FEET TO A 5/8 INCH IRON ROO AT A POINT-ON-CURVE ON THE NORTH RIGHT-OF-WAY BOLINDARY OF S.W. P4 WIC HIGHWAY; THENCE ALONG A 11,389.16 FOOT RADIUS CURVE TO THE RIGHT, (HAVING A CENTRAL ANGLE OF 0'30'44', A CHORD BEARING SOUTH 59'25'4S" WEST. AND A CHORD DISTANCE 101.81 FEET, ALONG SAID NORTH RIGHT-OF-WAY, 101.81 FEET TO A 5/8 INCH IRON ROD WITH YELLOW PLASTIC CAP INSCRIBED "W.B. WELLS"; THENCE NORTH 1370'54' WEST LEAVING SAID RIGHT-OF-WAY, 150.00 FEET TO A 5/8 INCH IRON ROD WITH YELLOW PLASTIC CAP INSCRIBED "W.B. WEU..S"; THENCE SOUTH 6011'30" WEST, 201.00 FEET TO THE POINT OF BEGINNING. CONTAINING 2.47 ACRES, MORE OR LESS. EXHIBIT "A" 111111111 11 III 2003-20020 Jerry R. Hanson, Ex Officio 931400 Washington County Clerk �= 155 N 1st Avenue Suite 130, MS 9 'a e . t Hillsboro, Or 97124 : 41w sr . w , PHONE 503-846-8752 �' � Comments: RECORDING Document# Recording Survey Vacation Transfer AST Fund NonStd US Other Total 2003-20020 D-E 15.00 6.00 11.00 32.00 32.00 Thank You Miscellaneous Fees Retain this receipt for your records ENTER#OF PAGES COPIED 3 0.75 ENTER#INSTRUMENTS LOCATED 1 $36.50 3.75 o .. 40.00 IE -3.50 Receipt# : 37125 Page 1 of 1