The URL can be used to link to this page

SDR2003-00018 SDR2003 - 00018 T-MOBILE WIRELESS COMMUNICATIONS MONOPOLE TOWER NOTICE OF TYPE II DECISION SITE DEVELOPMENT REVIEW (SDR) 2003-00018 Ai- CITY ''i�° OF TIGARD T-MOBILE COMMUNICATIONS MONOPOLE TOWER Community(Deretopment Shaping A Better Community 120 DAYS = 5/25/2004 SECTION I. APPLICATION SUMMARY FILE NAME: T-MOBILE WIRELESS COMMUNICATIONS MONOPOLE TOWER CASE NO.: Site Development Review (SDR) SDR2003-00018 PROPOSAL: The applicant is proposing to construct a 100-foot tall monopole tower. The associated accessory equipment will be placed within a fenced enclosure. APPLICANT: T-Mobile Wireless OWNER: Tigard Lodge #207 of AF & AM Attn: Jim Barta P.O. Box 230184 1500 NE Irving Street, Suite 530 Portland, OR 97281 Portland, OR 97232 LOCATION: 13680 SW Pacific Highway; WCTM 2S102CC, Tax Lot 1100. ZONE: C-G: General Commercial District. The C-G zoning district is designed to accommodate a full range of retail, office and civic uses with a city-wide and even regional trade area. APPLICABLE REVIEW CRITERIA: Community Development Code Chapters 18.390, 18.520, 18.705, 18.730, 18.745, 18.765, 18.780, 18.790, 18.795, 18.798 and 18.810. SECTION II. DECISION Notice is hereby given that the City of Tigard Community Development Director's designee has APPROVED the above request subject to certain conditions of approval. The findings and conclusions on which the decision is based are noted in Section VI. NOTICE OF TYPE II DECISION SDR2003-00018/T-MOBILE COMMUNICATIONS MONOPOLE PAGE 1 OF 21 CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL THE FOLLOWING CONDITIONS SHALL BE SATISFIED PRIOR TO THE ISSUANCE OF SITE/BUILDING PERMITS: Submit to the Planning Division (Morgan Tracy, 503-639-4171, ext. 2428) for review and approval: 1. Prior to issuance of site or building permits, the applicant shall provide staff with a noise study from a certified consultant or acoustical engineer that illustrates a design that ensures that any noise creating device used by the project does not exceed the allowable levels in TDC Section 18.798.060(B)(8). The study shall be governed by the prescribed techniques in TMC Section 7.40.140. The projects accessory systems must be constructed to meet the prescribed standards and shall be so reflected in the construction drawings. 2. Prior to issuance of site or building permits, the applicant/owner shall provide satisfactory legal evidence, in the form of deeds, easements, leases or contracts to establish the joint access. 3. Prior to issuance of site or building permits, the applicant/owner shall provide a revised site or landscape plan that shows: A. The addition of two medium to large sized street trees (minimum 2-inch caliper size at planting) along SW Pacific Highway, as approved by the City Forester. B. The plan shall also include a hedge of narrow or broad leaf evergreen shrubs in the areas with gaps along the southern boundary which will form a continuous screen of the height specified in Table 18.745.2 within two years of planting. C. A minimum of four additional evergreen trees, 15 feet in height at time of planting. These trees may be used as part of the screening of residential properties to the south (additional evergreens may be necessary to fully form the continuous hedge as described). 4. Prior to issuance of site or building permits, the applicant/owner shall submit a revised site plan that shows a minimum of 30 feet between the proposed utility trenches and any existing tree in excess of 12 inches diameter. This plan shall also indicate that "Should encroachments into this 30-foot zone be necessary, the applicant shall consult with and obtain the City Forester's approval prior to commencing work." THE FOLLOWING CONDITIONS SHALL BE SATISFIED PRIOR TO A FINAL BUILDING INSPECTION: Submit to the Planning Division (Morgan Tracy, 503-639-4171, ext. 2428) for review and approval: 5. Prior to final building inspection, the applicant shall ensure that the additional landscaping materials, as conditioned have been installed. Staff shall perform a site inspection to ensure that gaps in the screening along the southern boundary have been adequately planted. 6 Prior to final building inspection, the applicant shall provide documentation confirming that the noise levels in decibel ratings for the proposed radio cabinets are below 50 dBA (day)/40 dBA(night) measured at the property line. 7. Prior to final building inspection, the applicant shall ensure that a security light or motion detector light is installed to illuminate the rear of the property. This light shall be shielded to prevent light trespass onto adjacent properties. THIS APPROVAL SHALL BE VALID FOR EIGHTEEN (18) MONTHS FROM THE EFFECTIVE DATE OF THIS DECISION. NOTICE OF TYPE II DECISION SDR2003-00018/T-MOBILE COMMUNICATIONS MONOPOLE PAGE 2 OF 21 SECTION III. BACKGROUND INFORMATION Site History: Staff conducted a search of city records for the subject property. Apart from building and mechanical permits unrelated to the present request, no land use cases were found. The parcel is oriented at an angle but is roughly rectangular in shape. The adjacent property to the northeast is zoned C-G and is developed with multi-family units. The property to the southwest is also zoned C-G and is occupied by a religious institutional use. To the northwest is the property's frontage along SW Pacific Highway with commercial uses across the road. To the southeast and south are single-family properties in an R-3.5 zone. Vicinity Information: The subject site is located between McDonald Street and Garrett Street, on the east side of SW Pacific Highway, south of the Haagens Shopping Center. Site Information and Proposal Description: The applicant is proposing to construct a 100-foot-tall monopole tower for wireless communications service. SECTION IV. COMMENTS FROM PROPERTY OWNERS WITHIN 500 FEET One phone call was received from John Frewing, inquiring whether the proposed tower height exceeded the height limit in the zone. Staff explained that such structures are exempt from underlying zone height limits, and that the proposal was consistent with the type of review which required a Type II Site Development Review as it did not exceed 100 feet for a single user. SECTION V. SUMMARY OF APPLICABLE REVIEW CRITERIA The proposal's consistency with these Code Chapters is reviewed in the following sections: A. Zoning Districts 18.530 (Industrial Zoning Districts) B. Applicable Development Code Standards 18.705 Access Egress and Circulation) 18.745 Landscaping and Screening) 18.765 Off-Street parking and loading requirements) 18.780 Signs) 18.795 Visual Clearance) 18.798 Wireless Communication Facilities) C. Specific DR Approval Criteria 18.360 D. Street and Utility Improvement Standards 18.810 E. Impact Study 18.390 SECTION VI. APPLICABLE DEVELOPMENT CODE STANDARDS A. ZONIING DISTRICT Industrial Zoning District: Section 18.530.020 Lists the description of the Industrial Zoning Districts. The site is located in the C-G: General Commercial District. The proposed use, a Wireless Communications Facility, is permitted in this zone subject to the limitations of Chapter 18.798. NOTICE OF TYPE II DECISION SDR2003-00018/T-MOBILE COMMUNICATIONS MONOPOLE PAGE 3 OF 21 Development Standards: Section 18.530.040.B States that Development standards in commercial zoning districts are contained in Table 18.520.2 below: TABLE 18.520.2 DEVELOPMENT STANDARDS IN INDUSTRIAL ZONES STANDARD C-G Proposed Minimum Lot Size None 36,846 sq. ft. - Detached unit - _- Boarding, lodging, rooming house Minimum Lot Width 50 ft 104 ft. • Minimum Setbacks - Front yard 0 ft. 201' -Side facing street on corner&through lots - - -Side yard Oft[1] 41'168' -Side or rear yard abutting more restrictive zoning district - -Rear yard 20 ft [1] 83'6" -Distance between front of garage& property line abutting a public or - - private street. -Distance between tower and off-site residence(18.798.050) [2] 100% (100') 101' Maximum Height N/A[3] 20 ft. Maximum Site Coverage [4] 85% 75 Minimum Landscape Requirement 15% 25% [1]no setback shall be required except 20 feet shall be required where the zone abuts a residential zone. [2]Not part of this table,but included here for reference. [3]Per 18.730,towers are not subject to the height limitations of the title. The height of the tower determines the type of review per 18.798. [3]includes all buildings and impervious area The site is comprised of a single masonry building in the rear of the property with parking located up front. There are residential structures to the northeast, but they are not within a residential zone. The only areas where the more restrictive zoning district standards apply is to the south. The applicant's proposal is in compliance with the underlying zone requirements. FINDING: Based on the analysis above, the underlying zone's development criteria have been satisfied. B. APPLICABLE DEVELOPMENT CODE STANDARDS The Site Development Review approval standards require that a development proposal be found to be consistent with the various standards of the Community Development Code. Access, Egress and Circulation (18.705): Access plan: No building or other permit shall be issued until scaled plans are presented and approved as provided by this chapter that show how access, egress and circulation requirements are to be fulfilled. The applicant shall submit a site plan. The Director shall provide the applicant with detailed information about this submission requirement. The applicant has provided scaled plans showing access, egress and circulation for the proposed monopole from SW Pacific Highway, which is a public street. Joint access: Owners of two or more uses, structures, or parcels of land may agree to utilize jointly the same access and egress when the combined access and egress of both uses, structures, or parcels of land satisfies the combined requirements as designated in this title, provided: Satisfactory legal evidence shall be presented in the form of deeds, easements, leases or contracts to establish the joint use; and copies of the deeds, easements, leases or contracts are placed on permanent file with the City. NOTICE OF TYPE II DECISION SDR2003-00018/T-MOBILE COMMUNICATIONS MONOPOLE PAGE 4 OF 21 The applicant has proposed to utilize the existing site access and jointly share the driveway to the wireless communication facility site. An access easement will be required. Public street access: All vehicular access and egress as required in Sections 18.705.030H and 18.705.0301 shall connect directly with a public or private street approved by the City for public use and shall be maintained at the required standards on a continuous basis. The subject site is accessible from SW Pacific Highway, an improved public street that meets standards for public streets. Curb cuts: Curb cuts shall be in accordance with Section 18.810.030N: Concrete curbs, curb cuts, wheelchair, bicycle ramps and driveway approaches shall be constructed in accordance with standards specified in this chapter and Section 15.04.080: Concrete curbs and driveway approaches are required; except where no sidewalk is planned, an asphalt approach may be constructed with City Engineer approval and Asphalt and concrete driveway approaches to the property line shall be built to City configuration standards. The applicant proposes to utilize the existing curb cut and driveway apron, which conform to city standards. Walkways: On-site pedestrian walkways shall comply with the following standards: Walkways shall extend from the ground floor entrances or from the ground floor landing of stairs, ramps, or elevators of all commercial, institutional, and industrial uses, to the streets which provide the required access and egress. Walkways shall provide convenient connections between buildings in multi-building commercial, institutional, and industrial complexes. Unless impractical, walkways shall be constructed between new and existing developments and neighboring developments; The proposed facility is a non-inhabited structure and will be fenced off separately from the rest of the site for security purposes. Existing rights-of-way provide adequate pedestrian access to the site. Wherever required walkways cross vehicle access driveways or parking lots, such crossings shall be designed and located for pedestrian safety. Required walkways shall be physically separated from motor vehicle traffic and parking by either a minimum 6-inch vertical separation (curbed) or a minimum 3-foot horizontal separation, except that pedestrian crossings of traffic aisles are permitted for distances no greater than 36 feet if appropriate landscaping, pavement markings, or contrasting pavement materials are used. Walkways shall be a minimum of four feet in width, exclusive of vehicle overhangs and obstructions such as mailboxes, benches, bicycle racks, and sign posts, and shall be in compliance with ADA standards; There are no walkways proposed, therefore, this standard is met. Required walkways shall be paved with hard surfaced materials such as concrete, asphalt, stone, brick, etc. Walkways may be required to be lighted and/or signed as needed for safety purposes. Soft-surfaced public use pathways may be provided only if such pathways are provided in addition to required pathways. There are no walkways proposed, therefore, this standard is met. Minimum Access Requirements for Commercial and Industrial Use: Section 18.705.030.1 provides the minimum access requirements for commercial and industrial uses: able 18.705.3 indicates that the required access width for developments with 0-99 parking spaces is one 30-foot accesses with 24 feet of pavement. Vehicular access shall be provided to commercial or industrial uses, and NOTICE OF TYPE II DECISION SDR2003-000181T-MOBILE COMMUNICATIONS MONOPOLE PAGE 5 OF 21 shall be located within 50 feet of the primary ground floor entrances; additional requirements for truck traffic may be placed as conditions of site development review. The site has its primary access from SW Pacific Highway which is greater than 30 feet wide with more than 24 feet of pavement. The proposed development will not affect any change to the existing primary access point, which is in conformance with the code. One-way vehicular access points: Where a proposed parking facility indicates only one-way traffic flow on the site, it shall be accommodated by a specific driveway serving the facility; the entrance drive shall be situated closest to oncoming traffic and the exit drive shall be situated farthest from oncoming traffic. The existing primary access accommodates two-way traffic The Director has the authority to restrict access when the need to do so is dictated by one or more of the following conditions: To provide for increased traffic movement on congested streets and to eliminate turning movement problems, the Director may restrict the location of driveways on streets and require the location of driveways be placed on adjacent streets, upon the finding that the proposed access would: • Cause or increase existing hazardous traffic conditions; or • Provide inadequate access for emergency vehicles; or Cause hazardous conditions to exist which would constitute a clear and present danger to the public health, safety, and general welfare. To eliminate the need to use public streets for movements between commercial or industrial properties, parking areas shall be designed to connect with parking areas on adjacent properties unless not feasible. The Director shall require access easements between properties where necessary to provide for parking area connections; To facilitate pedestrian and bicycle traffic, access and parking area plans shall provide efficient sidewalk and/or pathway connections, as feasible, between neighboring developments or land uses; The existing access meets present city standards and affords good visibility in both directions of SW Pacific Highway. The proposed development will add two (2) trips per month. There is no need to place further restrictions on this access. An existing connection between parking areas on the subject site to the church on the south is in place. The property to the north is residentially used and therefore, not subject to this connection requirement. This standard is satisfied. FINDING: Based on the analysis above, the Access, Egress and Circulation standards have not been fully met, however by imposing the following condition, these standards will be satisfied. CONDITION: The applicant/owner shall provide satisfactory legal evidence, in the form of deeds, easements, leases or contracts to establish the joint access. Environmental Performance Standards (18.725) The purpose of these provisions is to apply the federal and state environmental laws, rules and regulations to development within the City of Tigard. These requirements are intended to prevent or mitigate for adverse environmental impacts to offsite properties from noise, visible emissions, vibration, odors, insects and rodents, and glare and heat. NOTICE OF TYPE II DECISION SDR2003-00018/T-MOBILE COMMUNICATIONS MONOPOLE PAGE 6 OF 21 The proposed wireless communication facility utilizes small self-contained cabinets for radio equipment. These units typically contain air conditioning units which are the primary source of sound generation. The applicant has included a noise study that analyzed equipment used at a different site in the county. That study is not relevant to this application, as the type of equipment is not indicated (and hence cannot be assumed to be identical), as well as the study is based on existing ambient noise levels for a site that is not in the immediate vicinity of the subject site. Moreover, the distances from the property line used to determine the sound levels do not match the circumstances in this proposal. The use does not generate trash, sewage, wastewater, vibration, odors, or visible emissions. As there will be no trash accumulation, there should be no harboring of insects or rodents. The dull galvanized color will minimize glare. FINDING: The applicant has not factually confirmed that the noise levels will be met at the property line with the proposed generator design. CONDITION: Prior to any site work, the applicant shall provide staff with a noise study from a certified consultant that illustrates a design that ensures that any noise creating device used by the project does not exceed the allowable levels in TDC Section 18.798.060(B)(8). The study shall be governed by the prescribed techniques in TMC Section 7.40.140. The projects accessory systems must be constructed to meet the prescribed standards. Landscaping and Screening (18.745): Street Trees: Section 18.745.040 states that all development projects fronting on a public street or a private drive more than 100 feet in length shall be required to plant street trees in accordance with Section 18.745.040.0 Section 18.745.040.0 requires that street trees be spaced between 20 and 40 feet apart depending on the size classification of the tree at maturity (small, medium or large). This development fronts a public street and is, therefore, required to have street trees. There are two trees along the public right-of-way that serve as street trees, however, the site is deficient in the number of street trees provided. The applicant will need to submit a revised landscape plan showing the addition of two trees along the public street frontage. The trees should be medium to large size species, subject to the City Forester's approval. Buffering and Screening: Section 18.745.050 states that buffering, but not screening is required between abutting uses that are of a different type when the uses are separated by a street. No buffer or screening is required between similar uses. The proposed use is located centrally within the commercial property. As such, no buffering and screening is required as the parent parcel and the applicant s proposed uses are similar. Buffering exists between the Masonic lodge and the apartments to the north, as well as screening that is present to the homes on the south. Screening: Special P-rovisions: Section 18.745.050.E requires the screening of parking and loading areas. Landscaped parking areas shall include special design features which effectively screen the parking lot areas from view. Planting materials to be installed should achieve a relative balance between low lying and vertical shrubbery and trees. Trees shall be planted in landscaped islands in all parking areas, and shall be equally distributed on the basis of one (1) tree for each seven (7) parking spaces in order to provide a canopy effect. The minimum dimension on the landscape islands shall be three (3) feet wide and the landscaping shall be protected from vehicular damage by some form of wheel guard or curb. NOTICE OF TYPE II DECISION SDR2003-00018/T-MOBILE COMMUNICATIONS MONOPOLE PAGE 7 OF 21 The proposed use does not require additional parking. There is screening provided for the existing parking lot but there are a couple of spots where the materials that make up the hedge have died or have been removed. The applicant is required to supplement the plantings along the southern boundary. Screening Of Service Facilities. Except for one-family and two-family dwellings, any refuse container or disposal area and service facilities such as gas meters and air conditioners which would otherwise be visible from a public street, customer or resident parking area, any public facility or any residential area shall be screened from view by placement of a solid wood fence or masonry wall between five and eight feet in height. All refuse materials shall be contained within the screened area; Service facilities are not needed for the proposed use, and have not been proposed. FINDING: Based on the analysis above, the landscaping and screening standards of this section have not been met. There are insufficient street trees, and there is a small gap in the required screening along the southern property boundary. CONDITION: The applicantiowner shall provide a revised site or landscape plan that shows: A. The addition of two medium to large sized street trees (minimum 2-inch caliper size at planting) along SW Pacific Highway, as approved by the City Forester. B. The plan shall also include a hedge of narrow or broad leaf evergreen shrubs in the areas with gaps along the southern boundary which will form a continuous screen of the height specified in Table 18.745.2 within two years of planting. C. Such street trees and evergreen hedge plants shall be installed prior to final building inspection. Mixed Solid Waste and Recyclables Storage (18.755): Chapter 18.755 requires that new construction incorporates functional and adequate space for on-site storage and efficient collection of mixed solid waste and source separated Recyclables prior to pick-up and removal by haulers. The applicant must choose one (1) of the following four (4) methods to demonstrate compliance: Minimum Standard, Waste Assessment, Comprehensive Recycling Plan, or Franchised Hauler Review and Sign-Off. The applicant will have to submit evidence or a plan which indicates compliance with this section. Regardless of which method chosen, the applicant will have to submit a written sign-off from the franchise hauler regarding the facility location and compatibility. No mixed solid waste collection or recyclables storage is needed for this use. No changes to the site's existing refuse collection area are proposed. Location Standards. To encourage its use, the storage area for source-separated recyclable shall be co- located with the storage area for residual mixed solid waste; indoor and outdoor storage areas shall comply with Uniform Building and Fire Code requirements; Storage area space requirements can be satisfied with a single location or multiple locations, and can combine both interior and exterior locations; Exterior storage areas can be located within interior side yard or rear yard areas. Exterior storage areas shall not be located within a required front yard setback or in a yard adjacent to a public or private street; Exterior storage areas shall be located in central and visible locations on a site to enhance security for users; Exterior storage areas can be located in a parking.area if the proposed use provides at least the minimum number of parking spaces required for the use after deducting the area used for storage. Storage areas shall be appropriately screened according to the provisions in 18.755.050 C, design standards; The storage area shall be accessible for collection vehicles and located so that the storage area will not obstruct pedestrian or vehicle traffic movement on the site or on public streets adjacent to the site. NOTICE OF TYPE II DECISION SDR2003-00018/T-MOBILE COMMUNICATIONS MONOPOLE PAGE 8 OF 21 No mixed solid waste collection or recyclables storage is needed for this use. Therefore, this standard is met. Design Standards. The dimensions of the storage area shall accommodate containers consistent with current methods of local collection; Storage containers shall meet Uniform Fire Code standards and be made and covered with waterproof materials or situated in a covered area; Exterior storage areas shall be enclosed by a sight-obscuring fence wall, or hedge at least six feet in height. Gate openings which allow access to users and haulers shall be provided. Gate openings for haulers shall be a minimum of 10 feet wide and shall be capable of being secured in a closed and open position; Storage area(s) and containers shall be clearly labeled to indicate the type of materials accepted. No mixed solid waste collection or recyclables storage is needed for this use. Therefore, this standard is met. FINDING: Based on the analysis above, the Mixed Solid Waste & Recyclables Storage Standards have been met. Off-Street Parking and Loading (18.765): Location of vehicle parking: Off-street parking spaces for single-family and duplex dwellings and single-family attached dwellings shall be located on the same lot with the dwellings. Off-street parking lots for uses not listed above shall be located not further than 200 feet from the building or use that they are required to serve, measured in a straight line from the building with the following exceptions: a) commercial and industrial uses which require more than 40 parking spaces may provide for the spaces in excess of the required first 40 spaces up to a distance of 300 feet from the primary site; The 40 parking spaces which remain on the primary site must be available for users in the following order of priority: 1) Disabled-accessible spaces; 2) Short-term spaces; 3) Long-term preferential carpool and vanpool spaces; 4) Long-term spaces. No parking is required for the proposed use. Therefore, this standard is met. Joint Parking: Owners of two or more uses, structures or parcels of land may agree to utilize jointly the same parking and loading spaces when the peak hours of operation do not overlay, subject to the following: 1) The size of the joint parking facility shall be at least as large as the number of vehicle parking spaces required by the larger(est) use per Section 18.765.070; 2) Satisfactory legal evidence shall be presented to the Director in the form of deeds, leases or contracts to establish the joint use; 3) If a joint use arrangement is subsequently terminated, or if the uses change, the requirements of this title thereafter apply to each separately. Joint parking is not proposed with this application. Therefore, this standard does not apply. Parking in Mixed-Use Projects: In mixed-use projects, the required minimum vehicle parking shall be determined using the following formula. 1) Primary use, i.e., that with the largest proportion of total floor area within the development, at 100% of the minimum vehicle parking required for that use in Section 18.765.060; 2) Secondary use, i.e., that with the second largest percentage of total floor area within the develo ment, at 90% of the vehicle parking required for that use in Section 18.765.060; 3 Subsequent use or uses, at 80% of the vehicle parking required for that use(s) in ection 18.765.060; 4) The maximum parking allowance shall be 150% of the total minimum parking as calculated in D.1.-3. above. The project is not considered a mixed-use project. Therefore, this standard does not apply. NOTICE OF TYPE II DECISION SDR2003-00018/T-MOBILE COMMUNICATIONS MONOPOLE PAGE 9 OF 21 Visitor Parking in Multi-Family Residential Developments: Multi-dwelling units with more than 10 required parking spaces shall provide an additional 15% of vehicle parking spaces above the minimum required for the use of guests of residents of the complex. These spaces shall be centrally located or distributed throughout the development. Required bicycle parking facilities shall also be centrally located within or evenly distributed throughout the development. This project does not involve a residential use. Therefore, this standard does not apply. Preferential Long-Term CarpoolNanpool Parking: Parking lots providing in excess of 20 long-term parking spaces shall provide preferential long-term carpool and vanpool parking for employees, students and other regular visitors to the site. At least 5% of total long-term parking spaces shall be reserved for carpool/vanpool use. Preferential parking for carpools/vanpools shall be closer to the main entrances of the building than any other employee or student parking except parking spaces designated for use by the disabled. Preferential carpool/vanpool spaces shall be full-sized per requirements in Section 18.765.040N and shall be clearly designated for use only by carpools and vanpools between 7:00 AM and 5:30 PM Monday through Friday. No parking is required for the proposed use. Therefore, no carpool/vanpool stalls are required. Disabled-Accessible Parking: All parking areas shall be provided with the required number of parking spaces for disabled persons as specified by the State of Oregon Uniform Building Code and federal standards. Such parking spaces shall be sized, signed and marked-as required by these regulations. No parking is required for the proposed use. The facility is not intended for public access and is, therefore, exempt from ADA accessibility requirements. Therefore, this standard has been met. Access Drives: With regard to access to public streets from off-street parking: access drives from the street to off-street parking or loading areas shall be designed and constructed to facilitate the flow of traffic and provide maximum safety for pedestrian and vehicular traffic on the site; the number and size of access drives shall be in accordance with the requirements of Chapter, 18.705, Access, Egress and Circulation; access drives shall be clearly and permanently marked and defined through use of rails, fences, walls or other barriers or markers on frontage not occupied by service drives; access drives shall have a minimum vision clearance in accordance with Chapter 18.795, Visual Clearance; access drives shall be improved with an asphalt or concrete surface; and excluding single-family and duplex residences, except as provided by Subsection 18.810.030.P, groups of two or more parking spaces shall be served by a service drive so that no backing movements or other maneuvering within a street or other public right-of-way will be required. No changes to the primary access are proposed. Pedestrian Access: Pedestrian access through parking lots shall be provided in accordance with Section 18.705.030.F. Where a parking area or other vehicle area has a drop-off grade separation, the property owner shall install a wall, railing, or other barrier which will prevent a slow-moving vehicle or driverless vehicle from escaping such area and which will prevent pedestrians from walking over drop-off edges. There are no changes proposed to the parking and there are no pedestrian destinations that would necessitate pedestrian access from the parking lot. NOTICE OF TYPE II DECISION SDR2003-00018/T-MOBILE COMMUNICATIONS MONOPOLE PAGE 10 OF 21 Parking Lot Striping: Except for single-family and duplex residences, any area intended to be used to meet the off-street parking requirements as contained in this Chapter shall have all parking spaces clearly marked; and all interior drives and access aisles shall be clearly marked and signed to show direction of flow and maintain vehicular and pedestrian safety. There are no changes proposed to the parking area and no parking is required for the proposed use. Therefore, this standard has been met. Wheel Stops: Parking spaces along the boundaries of a parking lot or adjacent to interior landscaped areas or sidewalks shall be provided with a wheel stop at least four inches high located three feet back from the front of the parking stall. The front three feet of the parking stall may be concrete, asphalt or low lying landscape material that does not exceed the height of the wheel stop. This area cannot be calculated to meet landscaping or sidewalk requirements. There are no changes proposed to the parking area and no parking is required for the proposed use. Therefore, this standard has been met. Space and Aisle Dimensions: Section 18.765.040.N states that: "except as modified for angled parking in Figures 18.765.1 and 18.765.2 the minimum dimensions for parking spaces are: 8.5 feet x 18.5 feet for a standard space and 7.5 feet x 16.5 feet for a compact space; aisles accommodating two direction traffic, or allowing access from both ends, shall be 24 feet in width. There are no changes proposed to the parking area and no parking is required for the proposed use. Therefore, this standard has been met. Bicycle Parking Location and Access: Section 18.765.050 states bicycle parking areas shall be provided at locations within 50 feet of primary entrances to structures; bicycle parking areas shall not be located within parking aisles, landscape areas or pedestrian ways; outdoor bicycle parking shall be visible from on-site buildings and/or the street. When the bicycle parking area is not visible from the street, directional signs shall be used to locate the parking area; and bicycle parking may be located inside a building on a floor which has an outdoor entrance open for use and floor location which does not require the bicyclist to use stairs to gain access to the space. Exceptions may be made to the latter requirement for parking on upper stories within a multi-story residential building. There are no changes proposed to the parking area and no bicycle parking is required for the proposed use. Therefore, this standard has been met. Bicycle Parking Design Requirements: Section 18.765.050.C. The following design requirements apply to the installation of bicycle racks: The racks required for required bicycle parking spaces shall ensure that bicycles may be securely locked to them without undue inconvenience. Provision of bicycle lockers for long-term (employee) parking is encouraged but not required; bicycle racks must be securely anchored to the ground, wall or other structure; bicycle parking spaces shall be at least 21/2 feet by six feet long, and, when covered, with a vertical clearance of seven feet. An access aisle of at least five feet wide shall be provided and maintained beside or between each row of bicycle parking; each required bicycle parking space must be accessible without moving another bicycle; required bicycle parking spaces may not be rented or leased except where required motor vehicle parking is rented or leased. At-cost or deposit fees for bicycle parking are exempt from this requirement; and areas set aside for required bicycle parking must be clearly reserved for bicycle parking only. Outdoor bicycle parking facilities shall be surfaced with a hard surfaced material, i.e., pavers, asphalt, concrete or similar material. This surface must be designed to remain well drained. NOTICE OF TYPE II DECISION SDR2003-00018/T-MOBILE COMMUNICATIONS MONOPOLE PAGE 11 OF 21 There are no changes proposed to the parking area and no bicycle parking is required for the proposed use. Therefore, this standard has been met. Minimum Bicycle Parking Requirements: The total number of required bicycle parking spaces for each use is specified in Table 18.765.2 in Section 18.765.070.H. In no case shall there be less than two bicycle parking spaces. As discussed above, according to Table 18.765.2 of the Tigard Development Code, the minimum bicycle-parking requirement for a Wireless Communication Facility is zero spaces. Minimum Off-Street Parking: Section 18.765.070.H states that the minimum and maximum parking shall be as required in Table 18.765.2. Table 18.765.2 states that the minimum parking for a Wireless Communication Facility is zero spaces. Therefore, this standard is satisfied. Off-Street Loading Spaces: Commercial, industrial and institutional buildings or structures to be built or altered which receive and distribute material or merchandise by truck shall provide and maintain off-street loading and maneuvering space as follows: A minimum of one loading space is required for buildings with 10,000 gross square feet or more; A minimum of two loading spaces for buildings with 40,000 gross square feet or more. The proposed Wireless Communication Facility will not be within a building. The existing building on site is approximately 3,800 square feet. Therefore, this standard does not apply to the applicant's proposal. FINDING: Based on the above analysis, the off-street parking and loading standards have been met. Signs (18.780): Chapter 18.780.130.D lists the type of allowable signs and sign area permitted in the I-P Zoning District. The proposed plans do not call for any signage. Based on this, this standard is met. FINDING: This standard is met, since the applicant has not proposed any signs. Tree Removal (18.790): Section 18.790.030 requires that a tree plan for the planting, removal and protection of trees prepared by a certified arborist shall be rovided with a site development review application. The tree plan shall include identification of all existing trees, identification of a program to save existing trees or mitigate tree removal over 12 inches in caliper, which trees are to be removed, protection program defining standards and methods that will be used by the applicant to protect trees during and after construction. The applicant has submitted a site plan that shows no trees greater than 12 inches will be removed. The forester has noted that any work within 30 feet of the existing trees on site will require his additional review for appropriate protection measures. The only work that may come within 30 feet of the existing trees is trenching for the utility lines. The underground power route is proposed through the middle of the site, but it is unclear where the underground telco route will be. By following the forester's requirements for tree protection, this standard will be met. FINDING: By following the recommendations of the City Forester by maintaining a minimum of 30 feet distance between the existing trees and proposed construction activity, including trench excavation, the trees on site should not be impacted. NOTICE OF TYPE II DECISION SDR2003-00018/T-MOBILE COMMUNICATIONS MONOPOLE PAGE 12 OF 21 CONDITION: The applicant/owner shall submit a revised site plan that shows a minimum of 30 feet between the proposed utility trenches and any existing tree in excess of 12 inches diameter. This plan shall also indicate that "Should encroachments into this 30 foot zone be necessary, the applicant shall consult with and obtain the City Forester's approval prior to commencing work." Visual Clearance Areas (18.795): Chapter 18.795 requires that a clear vision area shall be maintained on the corners of all property adjacent to intersecting right-of-ways or the intersection of a public street and a private driveway. A clear vision area shall-contain no vehicle, hedge pplanting, fence, wall structure, or temporary or permanent obstruction exceeding three (3) feet in height. The code provides that obstructions that may be located in this area shall be visually clear between three 13) and eight (8) feet in height (8) (trees may be placed within this area provided that all branches below eight (8) feet are removed). A visual clearance area is the triangular area formed by measuring a 30-foot distance along the street right- of-way and the driveway, and then connecting these two (2), 30-foot distance points with a straight line. The primary access to this property is from SW Pacific Highway. The vision clearance areas are shown on the applicant's site plan. A sight distance certification was submitted to confirm that there are no visual obstacles at the site's access entry. FINDING: The Visual Clearance Standards have been met. Wireless Communication Facilities (18.798): Chapter 18.798 allows wireless communication facilities in commercial zones, the I-P zone and public rights of way, subject to a Site Development Review process, provided they satisfy the specific criteria outlined in this chapter and are setback from any offsite residence a distance equal to the height of the tower. Aesthetic: New towers shall maintain a non-reflective gray finish or, if required by the FAA, be painted pursuant to the FAA's requirements; if collocation on an existing is requested, the design of any antenna(s), accessory structures or equipment shall, to the extent possible, use materials, colors and textures that will match the existing tower or non-tower structure to which the equipment of the collocating provider is being attached; if collocation on an existing non-tower structure is requested, the antenna(s) and supporting electrical and mechanical equipment shall be a neutral color that is the same as the color as the supporting structure so as to make the antenna(s) and related equipment as visually unobtrusive as possible. The proposed facility is not a collocation. The applicant has indicated that the tower will have a non reflective gray finish, however, alternate marking may be imposed by the FAA. Antennae will be concealed within the pole structure to be as visually unobtrusive as possible. Setbacks: Towers designed to collapse within themselves shall be set back in accordance with the setbacks contained in the base zone; towers not designed to collapse within themselves shall be set back from the property line by a distance equal to the height of the tower. The applicant has provided an engineer's analysis detailing the failure characteristics of the proposed tower. Staff concludes that since the tower is designed to "fold" in the middle, the relative fall zone is zero feet outside the facility compound. As described previously in this decision, the tower meets the underlying zone setbacks and is moreover 101 feet from the closest off-site structure. Tower spacing: No new tower shall be allowed within 500 feet of an existing tower. The nearest existing tower is approximately 2,500 feet to the north. The proposed communications tower (Case File CUP2003-00010) is approximately 2,200 feet to the south. Tower height: No tower shall exceed 100 feet for a single user or 125 feet for multiple users; NOTICE OF TYPE II DECISION SDR2003-00018/T-MOBILE COMMUNICATIONS MONOPOLE PAGE 13 OF 21 The proposed tower is for a single user, and will be 100 feet, including the self contained antenna canisters. Lighting: No lighting shall be permitted on a tower except as required by the FAA; No lighting has been proposed on the tower. Final lighting determination will be made by the FAA. Fencing and security: For security purposes, towers and ancillary facilities shall be enclosed by a minimum six-foot fence; The proposed facility will be enclosed by a six-foot-tall cedar fence, the equipment will be self contained and not housed in a separate structure. Landscaping and screening: Landscaping shall be placed outside the fence and shall consist of evergreen shrubs which reach six feet in height and 95% opacity within three years of planting; when adjacent to or within residentially-zoned property, free- standing towers and accessory equipment facilities shall be screened by the planting of a minimum of four evergreen trees at least 15 feet in height at the time of planting. The proposed tower is not within a residential zone, but is adjacent to one. The applicant has proposed a landscaping scheme that utilizes rhododendrons to form a continuous evergreen hedge around the perimeter of the compound along with four vine maples and groundcover. The plan is deficient in terms of the requirement for four evergreen trees at least 15 feet in height at time of planting. These trees could be used to satisfy or partially satisfy the previously imposed condition related to buffering and screening, discussed above. Noise: Noise-generating equipment shall be sound-buffered by means of baffling, barriers or other suitable means to reduce the sound level measured at the property line to 50 dBA (day)/40 dBA (night) when adjacent to a noise-sensitive land use and 75 dBA (day)/60 dBA (night) when adjacent to other uses. As discussed and conditioned previously, there is inadequate information available in the application to determine whether this standard will be met. By satisfying the previous condition, this standard will be met. FINDING: Based on the analysis above, the landscape plan is inadequate to meet the additional requirements for wireless communications facility sites adjacent to residential zones. Also, staff cannot determine based on the information provided, whether the specific requirements for noise buffering have been satisfied. However, with the imposition of the following conditions, these standards can be met. CONDITIONS: The applicant shall revise the landscape plan to include at a minimum an additional four evergreen trees, 15 feet in height at time of planting. These trees may be used as part of the screening of residential properties to the south as previously conditioned. The applicant shall provide documentation regarding the noise levels in decibel ratings for the proposed air conditioning units that shows the levels to be below 50 dBA (day)/40 dBA(night) measured at the property line. C. SPECIFIC SITE DEVELOPMENT REVIEW APPROVAL STANDARDS Section 18.360.090(A)(2) through 18.360.090(A)(15) provides additional Site Development Review approval standards not necessarily covered by the provisions of the previously listed sections. These additional standards are addressed immediately below with the following exceptions: NOTICE OF TYPE II DECISION SDR2003-00018/T-MOBILE COMMUNICATIONS MONOPOLE PAGE 14 OF 21 The proposal contains no elements related to the provisions of the following and are, therefore, found to be inapplicable as approval standards: 18.360.090.3 (Exterior Elevations); 18.360.090.5 (Privacy and Noise: Multi-family or Group Living Uses); 18.360.090.6 (Private Outdoor Areas: Multi-family Use); 18.360.090.7 (Shared Outdoor Recreation Areas: Multi-family Use); 18.360.090.8 (100-year floodplain); and 18.360.090.9 (Demarcation of Spaces). The following sections were discussed previously in this decision and, therefore, will not be addressed in this section: 18.360.090.4 (Buffering, Screening and Compatibility Between Adjoining Uses); 18.360.090.13 Parking); 18.360.090.14 (Landscaping); 18.360.090.15 (Drainage); and 18.360.090.14 (Provisions for the Disabled). Relationship to the Natural and Physical Environment: Buildings shall be: located to preserve existing trees, topography and natural drainage where possible based upon existing site conditions; located in areas not subject to ground slumping or sliding; located to provide adequate distance between adjoining buildings for adequate light, air circulation, and fire-fighting; and oriented with consideration for sun and wind. Trees shall be preserved to the extent possible. Replacement of trees is subject to the requirements of Chapter 18.790, Tree Removal. The proposed wireless communication facility site is located in a small landscape island surrounded by parking and building. No tree removal or drainage alteration is required to accommodate the proposed development and only a minimal amount of grading will be needed. Suitable separation is provided between the proposed equipment fenced enclosure and the buildings on or off site, which is adequate for light and air circulation. Crime Prevention and Safety: • Windows shall be located so that areas vulnerable to crime can be surveyed by the occupants; • Interior laundry and service areas shall be located in a way that they can be observed by others; • Mail boxes shall be located in lighted areas having vehicular or pedestrian traffic; • The exterior lighting levels shall be selected and the angles shall be oriented towards areas vulnerable to crime; and • Light fixtures shall be provided in areas having heavy pedestrian or vehicular traffic and in potentially dangerous areas such as parking lots, stairs, ramps and abrupt grade changes. Fixtures shall be placed at a height so that light patterns overlap at a height of seven feet, which is sufficient to illuminate a person. The un-staffed status of the site necessitates added security. Fencing is proposed to surround the monopole and radio cabinets. One of the neighbors commented during the neighborhood meeting that there was inadequate lighting at the rear of the building. FINDING: Staff concurs that security lighting would benefit this area, but notes that it may cause unwanted glare on neighboring properties. CONDITION: The applicant shall ensure that a security light or motion detector light is installed to illuminate the rear of the property. This light shall be shielded to prevent light trespass onto adjacent properties. Public Transit: Provisions within the plan shall be included to provide for transit if the development proposal is adjacent to existing or proposed transit route; the requirements for transit facilities shall be based on: the location of other transit facilities in the area; and the size and type of the proposal. The following facilities may be required after City and Tri-Met review: bus stop shelters; turnouts for buses; and connecting paths to the shelters. NOTICE OF TYPE II DECISION SDR2003-00018/T-MOBILE COMMUNICATIONS MONOPOLE PAGE 15 OF 21 The site has frontage on SW Pacific Highway. While SW Pacific Highway has a bus route, the proposed development is un-staffed and, therefore, does not generate potential ridership. Therefore, this standard does not apply. Provisions of the Underlying Zone: All of the provisions and regulations of the underlying zone shall apply unless modified by other sections or this title, e.g., Planned Developments, Chapter 18.350; or a variance or adjustment granted under Chapter 18.370. Dimensional Requirements: Provisions of the (C-G) General Commercial Zoning District have been addressed earlier in this decision under Section 18.520.040.B. FINDING: Based on the analysis above and the imposition of the conditions, the specific standards of the Site Development Review Section can be met. D. Street And Utility Improvements Standards (Section 18.810): Chapter 18.810 provides construction standards for the implementation of public and private facilities and utilities such as streets, sewers, and drainage. The applicable standards are addressed below: Streets: Improvements: Section 18.810.030.A.1 states that streets within a development and streets adjacent shall be improved in accordance with the TDC standards. Section 18.810.030.A.2 states that any new street or additional street width planned as a portion of an existing street shall be dedicated and improved in accordance with the TDC. This site lies adjacent to SW Pacific Highway, which is classified as a 5-lane Arterial in the City of Tigard Transportation System Plan. The street is presently improved to 5 lanes with bike lanes, curbs, gutters and sidewalks, but lacks adequate sidewalk width and planter strips. At present, there is approximately 84 feet of total right-of-way (ROW), or 42 feet from centerline according to the most recent tax assessor's map. The present standards for 5 lane arterial streets is 104 feet of total right-of-way (52 feet from centerline). Therefore, the applicant is required to dedicate 10 feet of right of way along the site frontage, to achieve the 52 foot from centerline requirement. Based on the impacts generated from the proposed use, it is not proportionate to require this dedication. Refer to the impact analysis later in this decision. Sidewalks: Section 18.810.070.A requires that sidewalks be constructed to meet City design standards and be located on both sides of arterial, collector and local residential streets. There are existing 5-foot-wide sidewalks along the site's frontage. Sanitary Sewers: Sewers Required: Section 18.810.090.A requires that sanitary sewer be installed to serve each new development and to connect developments to existing mains in accordance with the provisions set forth in Design and Construction Standards for Sanitary and Surface Water Management (as adopted by Clean Water Services in 1996 and including any future revisions or amendments) and the adopted policies of the comprehensive plan. Over-sizing: Section 18.810.090.0 states that proposed sewer systems shall include consideration of additional development within the area as projected by the Comprehensive Plan. NOTICE OF TYPE II DECISION SDR2003-00018/T-MOBILE COMMUNICATIONS MONOPOLE PAGE 16 OF 21 There is an existing 8-inch public sewer main located in SW Pacific Highway. The existing structure is already served by this main line. The proposed use does not require sewer service, so no additional public sewer line work is necessary for this development. Storm Drainage: General Provisions: Section 18.810.100.A states requires developers to make adequate provisions for storm water and flood water runoff. Accommodation of Upstream Drainage: Section 18.810.100.0 states that a culvert or other drainage facility shall be large enough to accommodate potential runoff from its entire upstream drainage area, whether inside or outside the development. The City Engineer shall approve the necessary size of the facility, based on the provisions of Design and Construction Standards for Sanitary and Surface Water Management (as adopted by Clean Water Services in 2000 and including any future revisions or amendments). The topography of this is very flat and is served by an internal system of surface drains. These drains discharge into the storm system in SW Pacific Highway. The applicant's onsite storm drainage plan will collect any surface water that would impact this site and convey it to the public system in SW Pacific Highway. Effect on Downstream Drainage: Section 18.810.100.D states that where it is anticipated by the City Engineer that the additional runoff resulting from the development will overload an existing drainage facility, the Director and Engineer shall withhold approval of the development until provisions have been made for improvement of the potential condition or until provisions have been made for storage of additional runoff caused by the development in accordance with the Design and Construction Standards for Sanitary and Surface Water Management (as adopted by Clean Water Services in 2000 and including any future revisions or amendments). CWS design standards provide that if the impervious area of a site is not increased over 5,000 square feet, then onsite detention is not required. The proposed wireless facility compound will include a small (134 s.f.) expansion to the paved area, and the 315 s.f. fenced enclosure will be hard surfaced. This results in a net increase in impervious area of 489 s.f. Therefore, on-site detention is not required for this project. Bikeways and Pedestrian Pathways: Bikeway Extension: Section 18.810.110.A states that developments adjoining proposed bikeways identified on the City's adopted pedestrian/bikeway plan shall include provisions for the future extension of such bikeways through the dedication of easements or right-of-way. Bike lanes are already existing along the site frontage. No bikeways are associated with this project. Therefore, this criterion does not apply. Cost of Construction: Section 18.810.110.B states that development permits issued for planned unit developments, conditional use permits, subdivisions, and other developments which will principally benefit from such bikeways shall be conditioned to include the cost or construction of bikeway improvements. No bikeways are associated with this project. Therefore, this criterion does not apply. Minimum Width: Section 18.810.110.0 states that the minimum width for bikeways within the roadway is five feet per bicycle travel lane. Minimum width for two-way bikeways separated from the road is eight feet. No bikeways are associated with this project. Therefore, this criterion does not apply. NOTICE OF TYPE II DECISION SDR2003-00018/T-MOBILE COMMUNICATIONS MONOPOLE PAGE 17 OF 21 Utilities: Section 18.810.120 states that all utility lines, but not limited to those required for electric, communication, lighting and cable television services and related facilities shall be placed underground, except for surface mounted transformers, surface mounted connection boxes and meter cabinets which may be placed above ground, temporary utility service facilities during construction, high capacity electric lines operating at 50,000 volts or above, and: • The developer shall make all necessary arrangements with the serving utility to provide the underground services; • The City reserves the right to approve location of all surface mounted facilities • All underground utilities, including sanitary sewers and storm drains installed in streets by the developer, shall be constructed prior to the surfacing of the streets,. and • Stubs for service connections shall be long enough to avoid disturbing the street improvements when service connections are made. Exception to Under-Grounding Requirement: Section 18.810.120.0 states that a developer shall pay a fee in-lieu of under-grounding costs when the development is proposed to take place on a street where existing utilities which are not underground will serve the development and the approval authority determines that the cost and technical difficulty of under-grounding the utilities outweighs the benefit of under- grounding in conjunction with the development. The determination shall be on a case- by-case basis. The most common, but not the only, such situation is a short frontage development for which under-grounding would result in the placement of additional poles, rather than the removal of above-ground utilities facilities. An applicant for a development which is served by utilities which are not underground and which are located across a public right-of-way from the applicant's property shall pay a fee in-lieu of under-grounding. There are existing overhead utility lines along both sides of SW Pacific Highway. According to the Engineering Department, the lines that front this site are high power lines, and are therefore exempt from this undergrounding requirement. All service utilities to the development shall be installed underground however. ADDITIONAL CITY AND/OR AGENCY CONCERNS WITH STREET AND UTILITY IMPROVEMENT STANDARDS: Public Water System: This site is located in the Tigard Water District service area. No requirements for additional water service are needed. Storm Water Quality: The City has agreed to enforce Surface Water Management (SWM) regulations established by Clean Water Services (CWS) Design and Construction Standards (adopted by Resolution and Order No. 00-7) which require the construction of on-site water quality facilities. The facilities shall be designed to remove 65 percent of the phosphorus contained in 100 percent of the storm water runoff generated from newly created impervious surfaces. In addition, a maintenance plan shall be submitted indicating the frequency and method to be used in keeping the facility maintained through the year. As less than 1,000 square feet of net new impervious areas is being created, no additional compliance measures are required. Grading and Erosion Control: CWS l esign and Construction Standards also regulate erosion control to reduce the amount of sediment and other pollutants reaching the public storm and surface water system resulting from development, construction, grading, excavating, clearing, and any other activity which accelerates erosion. Per CWS regulations, the applicant is required to submit an erosion control plan for City review and approval prior to issuance of City permits. NOTICE OF TYPE II DECISION SDR2003-000181r-MOBILE COMMUNICATIONS MONOPOLE PAGE 18 OF 21 The Federal Clean Water Act requires that a National Pollutant Discharge Elimination System (NPDES) erosion control permit be issued for any development that will disturb five or more acres of land. While the subject property is greater than 5 acres, the area of disturbance is limited to approximately 1200 square feet. Since this disturbed area is less than five acres, the developer will not be required to obtain an NPDES permit from the City prior to construction. This permit will be issued along with the site and/or building permit. A grading and erosion control plan must be submitted to the Building Division during the site permit review phase. The Building Division will review the onsite grading plan during the site permit review. A NPDES permit is not required, as the disturbance area is less than five acres in size. FINDING: Based on the above analysis, the Agency Concerns have been addressed by the application materials. Address Assignments: The City of Tigard is responsible for assigning addresses for parcels within the City of Tigard and within the Urban Service Boundary (USB). An addressing fee in the amount of $30.00 per address shall be assessed. This fee shall be paid to the City prior to issuance of a site permit. For this project, there is no additional addressing fee, as the existing address will be maintained. E. IMPACT STUDY (18.390) Section 18.360.090 states, "The Director shall make a finding with respect to each of the following criteria when approving, approving with conditions or denying an application:' Section 18.390.040 states that the applicant shall provide an impact study to quantify the effect of development on public facilities and services. For each public facility system and type of impact, the study shall propose improvements necessary to meet City standard, and to minimize the impact of the development on the public at large, public facilities systems, and affected private property users. In situations where the Community Development Code requires the dedication of real property interests, the applicant shall either specifically concur with a requirement for public right-of-way dedication, or provide evidence that supports that the real property dedication is not roughly proportional to the projected impacts of the development. Section 18.390.040 states that when a condition of approval requires the transfer to the public of an interest in real property, the approval authority shall adopt findings which support the conclusion that the interest in real property to be transferred is roughly proportional to the impact the proposed development will have on the public. The applicant has provided an impact study addressing the project's impacts on public systems. The study notes that there will be no impact to the transportation system as the facility will only generate one round trip per month. Bikeways will likewise not be affected. The drainage system will not be adversely impacted either. As the area to be developed is very small (489 s.f.), there is no requirement to detain or treat the stormwater runoff from the subject site. Parks, water and sewer systems will not be impacted as the proposed monopole is un-staffed and does not require sewer or water hookups. Earlier in this report, the issue about noise from the air conditioning units was raised, and a condition imposed that the applicant provides documentation regarding compliance with the noise limits. The Washington County Traffic Impact Fee (TIF) is a mitigation measure that is required at the time of development. Based on a transportation impact study prepared by Mr. David Larson for the A-Boy Expansion/Dolan II/Resolution 95-61, TIF's are expected to recapture 32 percent of the traffic impact of new development on the Collector and Arterial Street system. Based on the estimate that total TIF fees cover 32 percent of the impact on major street NOTICE OF TYPE II DECISION SDR2003-00018/T-MOBILE COMMUNICATIONS MONOPOLE PAGE 19 OF 21 improvements citywide, a fee that would cover 100 percent of this projects traffic impact is the TIF divided by 0.32. The difference between the TIF paid, and the full impact, is considered the unmitigated impact on the street system. The County's TIF Schedule does not include a TIF for wireless communications facilities as it generates a limited amount of traffic. Based on this, the TIF would be $0. A fee that would cover 100% of the unmitigated impact would be $0 (0 _ 0.32). The unmitigated impact of this project on the transportation system is therefore, $0. For purposes of evaluating the proportionality of the required exactions, the city uses an estimated value. The final value of these exactions may differ based on a fair market appraisal. The following lists the off-site exactions that are being imposed on the applicant and their estimated value: Right-of-way dedications to SW Pacific Highway 1,090 s.f. @ $15.00 s.f. $ 16,350 As the value of the proposed improvements is substantially greater than the unmitigated impact, it is not proportionate to exact these improvements. There is no TIF assessment for this use FINDING: While the proposal has not proposed dedicating sufficient right-of-way to meet city requirements of the Transportation System Plan (TSP) for ultimate planned roadway width, the proposed development has no significant impact on the transportation system. Therefore, it is not proportionate to require right of way dedication. SECTION VII. OTHER STAFF COMMENTS The City of Tigard Forester has reviewed the proposal and noted that no trees will be impacted by the proposed improvements should the construction maintain 30 feet of clearance from the base of the existing trees. The City of Tigard Engineering Manager and the City of Tigard Crime Prevention Office of the Police Department have reviewed the proposal and has no objections to it. Public Works Department has reviewed the proposal and have no objections to it. The City of Tigard Building Division notes that Site, Building, and Electrical Permits are required. SECTION VIII. AGENCY COMMENTS Washington County Communications (WCCCA) has reviewed the proposal and has no objections to it. SECTION IX. PROCEDURE AND APPEAL INFORMATION Notice: Notice was posted at City Hall and mailed to: X The applicant and owners X Owner of record within the required distance X Affected government agencies Final Decision: THIS DECISION IS FINAL ON FEBRUARY 25, 2004 AND BECOMES EFFECTIVE ON MARCH 11, 2004 UNLESS AN APPEAL IS FILED. NOTICE OF TYPE II DECISION SDR2003-00018/T-MOBILE COMMUNICATIONS MONOPOLE PAGE 20 OF 21 Appeal: The decision of the Director (Type II Procedure) or Review Authority (Type II Administrative Appeal or Type III Procedure) is final for purposes of appeal on the date that it is mailed. Any party with standing as provided in Section 18.390.040.G.1. may appeal this decision in accordance with Section 18.390.040.G.2. of the Tigard Community Development Code which provides that a written appeal together with the required fee shall be filed with the Director within ten (10) business days of the date the notice of the decision was mailed. The appeal fee schedule and forms are available from the Planning Division of Tigard City Hall, 13125 SW Hall Boulevard, Tigard, Oregon 97223. Unless the applicant is the appellant, the hearing on an appeal from the Director's Decision shall be confined to the specific issues identified in the written comments submitted by the parties during the comment period. Additional evidence concerning issues properly raised in the Notice of Appeal may be submitted by any party during the appeal hearing, subject to any additional rules of procedure that may be adopted from time to time by the appellate body. THE DEADLINE FOR FILING AN APPEAL IS AT 5:00 PM ON MARCH 10, 2004. Questions: If you have any questions, please call the City of Tigard Planning Division, Tigard City Hall, 13125 SW Hall Boulevard, Tigard, Oregon at (503) 639-4171. 41- , February 25, 2004 PREPAR D BY: Morg n Tracy DATE Associate Planner e February 25, 2004 "Re ED : : Richard H. Bew: •orff DATE Planning Manai is\curpin\morgan\workspace\sdr\sdr2003-00018(t-mobile masonic lodge)\sdr2003-00018 decision.doc NOTICE OF TYPE II DECISION SDR2003-000181T-MOBILE COMMUNICATIONS MONOPOLE PAGE 21 OF 21 I I — I 1 I I I — fill CITY of TIGARD A��p/t <_ GEOGRAPHIC INFORMATION SYSTEM ,� - VICINITY MAP -- _ COOK LN �� J QQr K I 7 1 -- `Ni = SDR2003-00018 FAIR HAVEN ST T MOBILE WIRELESS_____) MONOPOLE TOWER 041011' C . ... .1.10 'it" . * __- _ FAIRHAVEN / - PAt. f ar 2E1\2. ARK PL� �, 1;&• I irl IL. , I ___Iv,: 4=',EONI_ HILL VIEW ST if tIEEF E–'– .L_0JL''IA� a. , Q al — Tigard area Map Q -v �� D • _______I _T_./ .r�r G - 14«I •► S III - o 100 200 300 400 Feet I— 1'=310 feet IN City of Tigard• -- ------— InfOmnatlon on this maps location only and V• should be verified with the Development Services DwisiOR. 13125 SW Hall Blvd ar Tigard,OR 97223 (503)639-4171 �— http://www ci.ligard.or us Community Development Plot date:Feb 10,2004;C:\magic\MAGIC03.APR . R p A iw 1[IF4, , aG III I ..,na� name ma w▪rww.ra,/e.w �•u.ar v..u. maw IM a RI.▪-•.IN www oom n o:rm WM 0311/011.-172I SPITS■-• • r CA ul.1®r "%36) �l a}mY, • 1•.1 1f4C:161111/r Orr I ft Pr tit::it)1.0;::::;±0:?::1;thfit:::.;OA.. FT.S151.LOWSCAX gyp.- �ui.II.0 l / I II 'i hi All I l. III e' a �,, IIII ,uLiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiluuh fl!! � JI � , i� � �I<" I� UII VIII(III•,a U lull lu l I U. VIII; I I I II, I I)I III„� I' a,w _, Ili '^ ,I IIpI I .. v:: .................. .. n.,.u.il,..0 :Oh:Pi..i!,dtliillllllllllr.. 1s s --.--.--. NEST ELEVATION _ sum]/u'-r-Tr 2 SOUTH ELEVATION ® SCAM 3/,V-Y-V I 1 ITV OF TIGARD I SDR2003-00018 CRY OF TIGARD _. SITE PLAN N T-MOBILE WIRELESS MONOPOLE TOWER (Map is not to scale) Jr ' DESCRIPTIONS PARENT PARCEL • (PER DEED REFERID L MASER 9740529 OF TIE DEED RECORDS OF WASNWGTON COUNTY. OREGON.) COIMIICATIONS(LASE PRIORESS V BEGINNING AT THE SOUNDEST CORNER OF A COMMUNICATIONS LEASE SITE FROM WHICH TIE �*PRIME 'r VI9m 141 Y�E YOL111E IL P CCRNER OF AGE OF TNETPLAT q HE/C2113-PUT 2 AS PLATTED AND RECORDED• • F4 WA'A • 4976'35' RECORDS OF WASHINGTON COUNTY.OREGOII NEARS SWM FAST 111.77 FEET;THENCE NORM 5073'5,*NEST 1800 FEET: THENCE NORM 392!'OY EAST 25.33 FT37;TENCE SOOT 5073'59'FAST 1800 FEET: 00510E SWT/I/C:9 CONTNNI 759 SWARE fEETT MORE OR IESS.� G NID TERMNATWG D(SOURED PARfA• 25-7007 ACCESS AND i1fW7T 0ASEI(E]i'f DESCRIPTION: BEWINNG AT A POINT ON TIE EASTERLY RIGHT-OF-WAY UNE OF PACwlC HIGHWAY(US HIGHWAY I 99)FROM WHICH THE MORROWS',CORNER OF LOT I8 FREEON HEIGHTS-PUT 2 AS PLAITED ATEO RECORDED W 1VLUIIE 4 PACE 26 OF ME PUT RECpi05 OF WASHINGIUN CfEWTI,gEWN BEARS SOUM 547)5.19'EAST 324.73 FEET; THENCE SOUM 5071'09'EAST 197.19 FELT;THE710E ALONG ME ARC OF A 39.67 FOOT RADIUS CURW-ME CHON0 CF WHICH BEARS SOUTH 479'27 IY 2901 _ .• EAST.44.79 FEET: MEICE 40RTI 3929.02'EAST 10.75 FEET; THENCE NCRM 30.33'59' WEST \ 21.27 FEETTO THE EAST BOUNDARY OF ME ABOVE DESCRIBED COMMLNICCAIENS LEASE ARIA AND /` "// '0\\ SWIHNE�ST CORNER q SAID COMMUNICATIONS ISIFASE 918.6'02'CAST 12.50 FEET'FILOY 111E Vw / EUIDPNI N `�`�� \\ . EE 2g09pq VIM FULL MIN ' s'` N. .J` • �� ` 4 t: ``` 'Ns... / ` rs •�/ ` j • \N•N.,:s". ,:, n \..` !mr 4. S , s'S• ) fr.�'cy_ • r n \� �j, v0 `53'1,W `�:p At�4Y o, _ ` �;, / ,— i -: U 1OT ` �� i : ea. 4 s 49D B • I • • O 739'C 1• •• 0- ` o • / • s • . 1467• • • °A CITY OF TIGARD I SDR2003-00018 CM OF TIGARD SITE PLAN N T-MOBILE WIRELESS MONOPOLE TOWER (Map is not to scale) NOTICE OF TYPE II DECISION SITE DEVELOPMENT REVIEW (SDR) 2003-00018 °it CITY OF TIGARD Community cDevefopment T-MOBILE COMMUNICATIONS MONOPOLE TOWER 3Izaping.)4(Better Community 120 DAYS = 5/25/2004 SECTION I. APPLICATION SUMMARY FILE NAME: T-MOBILE WIRELESS COMMUNICATIONS MONOPOLE TOWER CASE NO.: Site Development Review (SDR) SDR2003-00018 PROPOSAL: The applicant is proposing to construct a 100-foot tall monopole tower. The associated accessory equipment will be placed within a fenced enclosure. APPLICANT: T-Mobile Wireless OWNER: Tigard Lodge #207 of AF & AM Attn: Jim Barta P.O. Box 230184 1500 NE Irving Street, Suite 530 Portland, OR 97281 Portland, OR 97232 LOCATION: 13680 SW Pacific Highway; WCTM 2S102CC, Tax Lot 1100. ZONE: C-G: General Commercial District. The C-G zoning district is designed to accommodate a full range of retail, office and civic uses with a city-wide and even regional trade area. APPLICABLE REVIEW CRITERIA: Community Development Code Chapters 18.390, 18.520, 18.705, 18.730, 18.745, 18.765, 18.780, 18.790, 18.795, 18.798 and 18.810. SECTION II . DECISION Notice is hereby given that the City of Tigard Community Development Director's designee has APPROVED the above request subject to certain conditions of approval. The findings and conclusions on which the decision is based are noted in the full decision, available at City Hall. THIS APPROVAL SHALL BE VALID FOR 18 MONTHS FROM THE EFFECTIVE DATE OF THIS DECISION. All documents and applicable criteria in the above-noted file are available for inspection at no cost or copies can be obtained for twenty-five cents (25c) per page, or the current rate charged for copies at the time of the request. SECTION III. PROCEDURE AND APPEAL INFORMATION Notice: Notice mailed to: X The applicant and owners X Owner of record within the required distance X Affected government agencies Final Decision: THIS DECISION IS FINAL ON FEBRUARY 25, 2004 AND BECOMES EFFECTIVE ON MARCH 11, 2004 UNLESS AN APPEAL IS FILED. Appeal: The Director's Decision is final on the date that it is mailed. All persons entitled to notice or who are otherwise adversely affected or aggrieved by the decision as provided in Section 18.390.040.G.1 may appeal this decision in accordance with Section 18.390.040.G.2 of the Tigard Community Development Code which provides that a written appeal together with the required fee shall be filed with the Director within ten (10) business days of the date the Notice of Decision was mailed. The appeal fee schedule and forms are available from the Planning Division of Tigard City Hall, 13125 SW Hall Boulevard, Tigard, Oregon 97223. Unless the applicant is the appellant, the hearing on an appeal from the Director's Decision shall be confined to the specific issues identified in the written comments submitted by the parties during the comment period. Additional evidence concerning issues properly raised in the Notice of Appeal may be submitted by any party during the appeal hearing, subject to any additional rules of procedure that may be adopted from time to time by the appellate body. 11 THE DEADLINE FOR FILING AN APPEAL IS 5:00 PM ON MARCH 10, 2004. 1 Questions: For further information please contact the Planning Division Staff Planner, Morgan Tracy at (503) 639-4171, Tigard City Hall, 13125 SW Hall Boulevard, Tigard, Oregon 97223. L--L.I T 1,- ---' / / —1 - -__ __ - victim/liAP 483177-TI)J__1 1 -: _ c i * $ \ ,SDR2003-00018 1 1-MOBILE WIRELESS = Illt MONOPOLE TOWER _ -;1 1 lE" 1_ l[i , z -------_____ ,_-__ \NNI_i_ .. IP. V k't !-- L-T T I MAliptiffAiri VIEW MN iltac 4 ft-40 4 ST EMI C.M—-— ----c is EN I 1 r---- / vY A III ___/ cN__ Mk , me ____. _11 III 27- Cary of Tissrd ng.cm vm )/ / ', / '''--- SM.., ............a.. +Nkf719%—,„___ IMMIAIL—•,_ •fre 4411Meel.—'-- IC.' EVA* IftW RV ••••—•05 en- ,' /` ',7•10.7.-:::.5k 6-ftzt.i...- — wi, t,wolla II IVAI1&WM 44 CITY OF TIGARD I SDR2003-00018 SITE PLAN N 1-MOBILE WIRELESS MONOPOLE TOWER (Map Is not to setts) ,- - ,-- NN .- _•-• .. :-._ 7.- , -_ ,- ---\4 . ' i V$Jt. .0 . CITY OF TIGARD 1 SDR2003-00018 SITE PLAN N 1-MOBILE WIRELESS MONOPOLE TOWER (Map Is not to scale) — NOTICE TO MORTGAGEE, LIENHOLDER,VENDOR OR SELLER: THE TIGARD DEVELOPMENT CODE REQUIRES THAT IF YOU RECEIVE THIS NOTICE,IT SHALL BE PROMPTLY FORWARDED TO THE PURCHASER. NOTICE OF PENDING LAND USE APPLICATION DEVELOPMENT REVIEW TOFTI CITYY OF TIGARD Community(Development S(tapingA Better Community DATE OF NOTICE: February 10, 2004 FILE NUMBER: SITE DEVELOPMENT REVIEW (SDR) 2003-00018 Type II Land Use Application FILE NAME: T-MOBILE WIRELESS MONOPOLE TOWER PROPOSAL: The applicant is requesting Site Development Review approval to construct a new wireless communications facility consisting of a 100-foot monopole tower and BTS radio transmitting equipment cabinets mounted on the ground adjacent to the monopole. The proposed lease area will be placed within a fenced enclosure. ZONE: C-G: General Commercial District. The C-G zoning district is designed to accommodate a full range of retail, office and civic uses with a city-wide and even regional trade area. Except where non-conforming, residential uses are limited to single-family residences which are located on the same site as a permitted use. A wide range of uses, including but not limited to adult entertainment, automotive equipment repair and storage, mini-warehouses, utilities, heliports, medical centers, major event entertainment, and gasoline stations, are permitted conditionally. APPLICABLE REVIEW CRITERIA: Community Development Code Chapters 18.370, 18.390, 18.520, 18.705, 18.730, 18.745, 18.765, 18.790, 18.795, 18.798 and 18.810. LOCATION: 13680 SW Pacific Highway; WCTM 2S102CC, Tax Lot 1100. YOUR RIGHT TO PROVIDE WRITTEN COMMENTS: Prior to the City making any decision on the Application, you are hereby provided a fourteen (14) day period to submit written comments on the application to the City. TJf FOURTEEN (14) DAY PERIOD ENDS AT 5:00 PM ON FEBRUARY 24, 2004. All comments should be directed to Morgan Tracy, Associate Planner in the Planning Division at the City of Tigard, 13125 SW Hall Boulevard, Tigard, Oregon 97223. You may reach the City of Tigard by telephone at (503) 639-4171 or by e-mail to morgan(a�ci.tigard.or.us. ALL COMMENTS MUST BE RECEIVED BY THE CITY OF TIGARD IN WRITING PRIOR TO 5:00 PM ON THE DATE SPECIFIED ABOVE IN ORDER FOR YOUR COMMENTS TO BE CONSIDERED IN THE DECISION MAKING PROCESS THE CITY OF TIGARD APPRECIATES RECEIVING COMMENTS AND VALUES YOUR INPUT. COMMENTS WILL BE CONSIDERED AND ADDRESSED WITHIN THE NOTICE OF DECISION. A DECISION ON THIS ISSUE IS TENTATIVELY SCHEDULED FOR MARCH 22, 2004. IF YOU PROVIDE COMMENTS, YOU WILL BE SENT A COPY OF THE FULL DECISION ONCE IT HAS BEEN RENDERED. WRITTEN COMMENTS WILL BECOME A PART OF THE PERMANENT PUBLIC RECORD AND SHALL CONTAIN THE FOLLOWING INFORMATION: • Address the specific "Applicable Review Criteria" described in the section above or any other criteria believed to be applicable to this proposal; • Raise any issues and/or concerns believed to be important with sufficient evidence to allow the City to provide a response; • Comments that provide the basis for an appeal to the Tigard Hearings Officer must address the relevant approval criteria with sufficient specificity on that issue. Failure of any party to address the relevant approval criteria with sufficient specificity may preclude subsequent appeals to the Land Use Board of Appeals or Circuit Court on that issue. Specific findings directed at the relevant approval criteria are what constitute relevant evidence. AFTER THE 14 DAY COMMENT PERIOD CLOSES, THE DIRECTOR SHALL ISSUE A TYPE II ADMINISTRATIVE DECISION. THE DIRECTOR'S DECISION SHALL BE MAILED TO THE APPLICANT AND TO OWNERS OF RECORD OF PROPERTY LOCATED WITHIN 500 FEET OF THE SUBJECT SITE, AND TO ANYONE ELSE WHO SUBMITTED WRITTEN COMMENTS OR WHO IS OTHERWISE ENTITLED TO NOTICE. THE DIRECTOR'S DECISION SHALL ADDRESS ALL OF THE RELEVANT APPROVAL CRITERIA. BASED UPON THE CRITERIA AND THE FACTS CONTAINED WITHIN THE RECORD, THE DIRECTOR SHALL APPROVE, APPROVE WITH CONDITIONS OR DENY THE REQUESTED PERMIT OR ACTION. SUMMARY OF THE DECISION-MAKING PROCESS: • The application is accepted by the City • Notice is sent to property owners of record within 500 feet of the proposed development area allowing a 14-day written comment period. • The application is reviewed by City Staff and affected agencies. • City Staff issues a written decision. • Notice of the decision is sent to the Applicant and all owners or contract purchasers of record of the site; all owners of record of property located within 500 feet of the site, as shown on the most recent property tax assessment roll; any City-recognized neighborhood group whose boundaries include the site; and any governmental agency which is entitled to notice under an intergovernmental agreement entered into with the City which includes provision for such notice or anyone who is otherwise entitled to such notice. INFORMATION/EVIDENCE AVAILABLE FOR REVIEW: The application, written comments and supporting documents relied upon by the Director to make this decision are contained within the record and are available for public review at the City of Tigard Community Development Department. Copies of these items may be obtained at a cost of $.25 per page or the current rate charged for this service. Questions regarding this application should be directed to the Planning Staff indicated on the first page of this Notice under the section titled "Your Right to Provide Written Comments." ..�T----1-- - - / - - Olrrol TrGAFO, A_,L _. —_�' Lk\S SDR2003-00018 _ ' _ i I. I T-MOBILE WIRELESS • yI � _ ■ � MONOPOLE TOWER ,1 � 414,,,, ,, _ ,,,,,, 1. I I I T lik,',, �a , isitei 11111111i noitstij, 1 I� / • �Ew sr ■ ? ,fir 1 , 1 L/ 46 Fai 1116•11111 II a IA A :: 1 nlvefto _ : Oty ofTigard REQUEST FOR COMMENTS Feb . 27 . 2004 2 : 12PM No . 6592 P . 1/1 REQUEST FOR, COMMENTS CARD Community Devefapnten[ DATE: February 10,2004 Shaping Better Community TO: Toni Highland,Oregon Department of Aviation FROM: City of Tigard Planning Division STAFF CONTACT: Morgan Tracy,Associate Planner(x24281 Phone: 15031639-4171/Fax: 15031684-7297 SITE DEVELOPMENT REVIEW ISDRI 2003-00018 ➢ T-MOBILE WIRELESS MONOPOLE TOWER Q REQUEST: The applicant is requesting Site Development Review approval to construct a new wireless communications facility consisting of a 100-foot monopole tower and BTS radio transmitting equipment cabinets mounted on the ground adjacent to the monopole. The proposed lease area will be placed within a fenced enclosure. LOCATION: 13680 SW Pacific Highway; WCTM 2S102CC, Tax Lot 1100. ZONE: C-G: General Commercial District, The C-G zoning district is designed to accommodate a full range of retail, office and civic uses with a city-wide and even regional trade area. Except where non- conforming, residential uses are limited to single-family residences which are located on the same site as a permitted use.. A wide range of uses, including but not limited to adult entertainment, automotive equipment repair and storage, mini-warehouses, utilities, heliports, medical centers, major event entertainment, and gasoline stations, are permitted conditionally. APPLICABLE REVIEW CRITERIA: Community Development Code Chapters 18.370, 18.390, 18.520, 18.705, 18.730, 18.745, 18„765, 18.790, 18.795 and 18„798,. ji $10 Attached are the Site Plan, Vicinity Map and Applicant's Materials for your review. From information supplied by various departments and agencies and from other information available to our staff, a report and recommendation will be prepared and a decision will be rendered on the .ro•osal in the near future. If Wyou wish to comment on this application, WE`NEED Is'G O `.' i' � fr. �,�.,. " :i•.: ;;• :��; ;:;�.r. .' f You may use the space provided be ow or a ac a separa e e'er to re urn your commen S. you are unable to respond by the above date, please phone the staff contact noted above with your comments and confirm your comments in writing as soon as possible. If you have any questions, contact the Tigard Planning Division, 13125 SW Hall Boulevard, Tigard, OR 97223. n. ....� , ,{ }�„ p IM1 . 'S..li,41 1.� •'3 �5 w d� +d a, t i mrrn, t r f_r:: �'' � i { (,( ''',! ♦ �. r,..� n.,�. I ,hyA,s.� : F.,. i � �, yav uc�G,u:tlumc;p �tl"aa. ,�”r'.k4/3 ad. u.r�,,i• i��:� ��'.,L,c,(�,��Lw,.�;a'� We have reviewed the proposal and have no objections to it. Please contact of our office. Please refer to the enclosed letter. Written comments provided below: Na Si�u I Ft "ru \ A-7 (0).J i v- 0 --r— r t 0 0 k—(:--0 0 Name & Number of Person Commenting: -777.4., R � _ D� D o,c f V t k .... A REQUEST FOR COMMENTS 11 OF CITY f 41.' Community Development Shaping Better Community DATE: February 10,2004 TO: Matt Stine,Urban Forester/Public Works Annex FROM: City of Tigard Planning Division STAFF CONTACT: Morgan Tracy,Associate Planner[x24281 Phone: (5031639-4111/Fax: 1503)684-1291 SITE DEVELOPMENT REVIEW(SDRI 2003-00018 T-MOBILE WIRELESS MONOPOLE TOWER REQUEST: The applicant is requesting Site Development Review approval to construct a new wireless communications facility consisting of a 100-foot monopole tower and BTS radio transmitting equipment cabinets mounted on the ground adjacent to the monopole. The proposed lease area will be placed within a fenced enclosure. LOCATION: 13680 SW Pacific Highway; WCTM 2S102CC, Tax Lot 1100. ZONE: C-G: General Commercial District. The C-G zoning district is designed to accommodate a full range of retail, office and civic uses with a city-wide and even regional trade area. Except where non- conforming, residential uses are limited to single-family residences which are located on the same site as a permitted use. A wide range of uses, including but not limited to adult entertainment, automotive equipment repair and storage, mini-warehouses, utilities, heliports, medical centers, major event entertainment, and gasoline stations, are permitted conditionally. APPLICABLE REVIEW CRITERIA: Community Development Code Chapters 18.370, 18.390, 18.520, 18.705, 18.730, 18.745, 18.765, 18.790, 18.795 and 18.798 1- i , 80, Attached are the Site Plan, Vicinity Map and Applicant's Materials for your review. From information supplied by various departments and agencies and from other information available to our staff, a report and recommendation will be prepared and a decision will be rendered on the proposal in the near future. If you wish to comment on this application, WE NEED YOUR COMMENTS BACK BY: FEBRUARY 24, 2004. You may use the space provided below or attach a separate letter to return your comments. If you are unable to respond by the above date, please phone the staff contact noted above with your comments and confirm your comments in writing as soon as possible. If you have any questions, contact the Tigard Planning Division, 13125 SW Hall Boulevard, Tigard, OR 97223. PLEASE CHECK THE FOLLOWING ITEMS THAT APPLY: We have reviewed the proposal and have no objections to it. Please contact of our office. Please refer to the enclosed letter. X Written comments provided below: U It ar SEEMS zt+ww-T r(4- nE is fN x.tsritv4 fs i ffi-L T 6kvEw+4-Y. IF A-Nf wof(k rs Jr, PVC boM • W t r fi t tJ 3c) oF MU Y 7-1k o A15(r-E Q'/-I& (L.• IN D8 4 T WAnIT TO kNOW. M,-rr-S Tpi, 2/* Name & Number of Person Commenting: Octic---41‘.------- 1--- REQUEST FOR COMMENTS CIO TIGARD Community(Development Shaping Better Community DATE: February 10,2004 TO: Brian Bauer,Engineering Manager FROM: City of Tigard Planning Division STAFF CONTACT: Morgan Tracy,Associate Planner[x24281 Phone: [503)639-4171/Fax: [5031684-1291 SITE DEVELOPMENT REVIEW[SOB)2003-00018 T-MOBILE WIRELESS MONOPOLE TOWER Q REQUEST: The applicant is requesting Site Development Review approval to construct a new wireless communications facility consisting of a 100-foot monopole tower and BTS radio transmitting equipment cabinets mounted on the ground adjacent to the monopole. The proposed lease area will be placed within a fenced enclosure. LOCATION: 13680 SW Pacific Highway; WCTM 2S102CC, Tax Lot 1100. ZONE: C-G: General Commercial District. The C-G zoning district is designed to accommodate a full range of retail, office and civic uses with a city-wide and even regional trade area. Except where non- conforming, residential uses are limited to single-family residences which are located on the same site as a permitted use. A wide range of uses, including but not limited to adult entertainment, automotive equipment repair and storage, mini-warehouses, utilities, heliports, medical centers, major event entertainment, and gasoline stations, are permitted conditionally. APPLICABLE REVIEW CRITERIA: Community Development Code Chapters 18.370, 18.390, 18.520, 18.705, 18.730, 18.745, 18.765, 18.790, 18.795 and 18.798 a,Y L / , gio Attached are the Site Plan, Vicinity Map and Applicant's Materials for your review. From information supplied by various departments and agencies and from other information available to our staff, a report and recommendation will be prepared and a decision will be rendered on the proposal in the near future. If you wish to comment on this application, WE NEED YOUR COMMENTS BACK BY: FEBRUARY 24, 2004. You may use the space provided below or attach a separate letter to return your comments. If you are unable to respond by the above date, please phone the staff contact noted above with your comments and confirm your comments in writing as soon as possible. If you have any questions, contact the Tigard Planning Division, 13125 SW Hall Boulevard, Tigard, OR 97223. PLEASE ICHECKTHETOLLOWIRG ITEMS THAT APPLY: », � �$ ., We have reviewed the proposal and have no objections to it. Please contact of our office. Please refer to the enclosed letter. Written comments provided below: Name & Number of Person Commenting: l-7- o+ REQUEST FOR COMMENTS CITY OF TIGARD Community(Development S(apingA Better Community DATE: February 10,2004 TO: Jim Wolf,Tigard Police Department Crime Prevention Officer FROM: City of Tigard Planning Division STAFF CONTACT: Morgan Tracy,Associate Planner[x24281 Phone: [5031639-4111/Fax: [5031 684-1291 SITE DEVELOPMENT REVIEW[SDRI 2003-00018 T-MOBILE WIRELESS MONOPOLE TOWER < REQUEST: The applicant is requesting Site Development Review approval to construct a new wireless communications facility consisting of a 100-foot monopole tower and BTS radio transmitting equipment cabinets mounted on the ground adjacent to the monopole. The proposed lease area will be placed within a fenced enclosure. LOCATION: 13680 SW Pacific Highway; WCTM 2S102CC, Tax Lot 1100. ZONE: C-G: General Commercial District. The C-G zoning district is designed to accommodate a full range of retail, office and civic uses with a city-wide and even regional trade area. Except where non- conforming, residential uses are limited to single-family residences which are located on the same site as a permitted use. A wide range of uses, including but not limited to adult entertainment, automotive equipment repair and storage, mini-warehouses, utilities, heliports, medical centers, major event entertainment, and gasoline stations, are permitted conditionally. APPLICABLE REVIEW CRITERIA: Community Development Code Chapters 18.370, 18.390, 18.520, 18.705, 18.730, 18.745, 18.765, 18.790, 18.795 and 18.798.; ` b , Attached are the Site Plan, Vicinity Map and Applicant's Materials for your review. From information supplied by various departments and agencies and from other information available to our staff, a report and recommendation will be prepared and a decision will be rendered on the proposal in the near future. If you wish to comment on this application, WE NEED YOUR COMMENTS BACK BY: FEBRUARY 24, 2004. You may use the space provided below or attach a separate letter to return your comments. If you are unable to respond by the above date, please phone the staff contact noted above with your comments and confirm your comments in writing as soon as possible. If you have any questions, contact the Tigard Planning Division, 13125 SW Hall Boulevard, Tigard, OR 97223. PLEASE CHECK THE FOLLOWING ITEMS THAT APPLY: We have reviewed the proposal and have no objections to it. Please contact of our office. Please refer to the enclosed letter. Written comments provided below: Name & Number of Person Commenting: .40 4.a,51.• i ir .I�R1 REQUEST FOR COMMENTS CITY OFTIOARD Community(Development S(aping A(Better Community DATE: February 10,2004 TO: Brian Blalock,Commercial Plans Examiner FROM: City of Tigard Planning Division STAFF CONTACT: Morgan Tracy,Associate Planner(x24281 Phone: (5031639-41711 Fax: (5031684-7297 SITE DEVELOPMENT REVIEW(SDRI 2003-00018 T-MOBILE WIRELESS MONOPOLE TOWER REQUEST: The applicant is requesting Site Development Review approval to construct a new wireless communications facility consisting of a 100-foot monopole tower and BTS radio transmitting equipment cabinets mounted on the ground adjacent to the monopole. The proposed lease area will be placed within a fenced enclosure. LOCATION: 13680 SW Pacific Highway; WCTM 2S102CC, Tax Lot 1100. ZONE: C-G: General Commercial District. The C-G zoning district is designed to accommodate a full range of retail, office and civic uses with a city-wide and even regional trade area. Except where non- conforming, residential uses are limited to single-family residences which are located on the same site as a permitted use. A wide range of uses, including but not limited to adult entertainment, automotive equipment repair and storage, mini-warehouses, utilities, heliports, medical centers, major event entertainment, and gasoline stations, are permitted conditionally. APPLICABLE REVIEW CRITERIA: Community Development Code Chapters 18.370, 18.390, 18.520, 18.705, 18.730, 18.745, 18.765, 18.790, 18.795 and 18.798.E ,'g, pit • Attached are the Site Plan, Vicinity Map and Applicant's Materials for your review. From information supplied by various departments and agencies and from other information available to our staff, a report and recommendation will be prepared and a decision will be rendered on the proposal in the near future. If you wish to comment on this application, WE NEED YOUR COMMENTS BACK BY: FEBRUARY 24, 2004. You may use the space provided below or attach a separate letter to return your comments. If you are unable to respond by the above date, please phone the staff contact noted above with your comments and confirm your comments in writing as soon as possible. If you have any questions, contact the Tigard Planning Division, 13125 SW Hall Boulevard, Tigard, OR 97223. PLEASE CHECK THE FOLLOWING ITEMS THAT APPLY: We have reviewed the proposal and have no objections to it. Please contact of our office. Please refer to the enclosed letter. Written comments provided below: /T1 PC/Z/1 IT 61)/L0/N6- 1=7C1z/1 / T c_ etCc7,eicAL PG/en T.f . / t t t C Name & Number of Person Commenting: gR SAN 13 44 c oc/e_ �� REQUEST FOR COMMENTS CARD Community,Oeve(opment SFapmg,W Better Community DATE: February 10,2004 TO: Dave Austin,WCCCA FROM: Clty of Hurd Planning Division STAFF CONTACT: Morgan Tracy,Associate Planner Uc2428) Phone: [5031639-4111/Fax: (5031 684-1291 SITE DEVELOPMENT REVIEW MDR]2003-00018 T-MOBILE WIRELESS MONOPOLE TOWER < REQUEST: The applicant is requesting Site Development Review approval to construct a new wireless communications facility consisting of a 100-foot monopole tower and BTS radio transmitting equipment cabinets mounted on the ground adjacent to the monopole. The proposed lease area will be placed within a fenced enclosure. LOCATION: 13680 SW Pacific Highway; WCTM 2S102CC, Tax Lot 1100. ZONE: C-G: General Commercial District. The C-G zoning district is designed to accommodate a full range of retail, office and civic uses with a city-wide and even regional trade area. Except where non- I conforming, residential uses are limited to single-family residences which are located on the same site as a permitted use. A wide range of uses, including but not limited to adult entertainment, automotive equipment repair and storage, mini-warehouses, utilities, heliports, medical centers, major event entertainment, and gasoline stations, are permitted conditionally. APPLICABLE REVIEW CRITERIA: Community Development Code Chapters 18.370, 18.390, 18.520, 18.705, 18.730, 18.745, 18.765, 18.790, 18.795 and 18.798, , ) > Attached are the Site Plan, Vicinity Map and Applicant's Materials for your review, From information supplied by various departments and agencies and from other information available to our staff, a report and recommendation will be prepared and a decision will be rendered on the aro•osal in the near future. If 2 you wish to comment on this application, ._ ;;_,`� I,��!3�,' '!I. :,�! frrr��p�' fir:: - W;a�p� '!L ',•"�s•f�'`.W n'i1wr'k You may use the space provided be ow or a'ac a separa e e'er • re urn your commen s. - you are unable to respond by the above date, please phone the staff contact noted above with your comments and confirm your comments in writing as soon as possible. If you have any questions, contact the Tigard Planning Division, 13125 SW Hall Boulevard, Tigard, OR 97223. itnn �+s y�rrC I' I' 1'��r 1 1 l M1 JI � I.+11 ,1' S E04001 a 0 ,I l el.10 I� 0 ItiT M5 '' I i )1) 1 �, 1'1" Hi l ''if i rd11 a7r nH411u" f i 1. r � c {� i�, I �t r'f111� �� "�11,�!'?�'7�'ir`"II'I w I� II:� li;'fll'}'l��rl#c,a��r+,lr,�,'I;,i'°.:;,.,.•��: f= We have reviewed the proposal and have no objections to it. Please contact of our office. Please refer to the enclosed letter. Written comments provided below: Name & Number of Person Commenting: 5)3 6 4o- 6011 2A7 TOO[n MINQV VDDDM 98TO TES COS XV I Lr:TT I&1 PO/CT/ZO Ji REQUEST FOR COMMENTS CITY OFTIGARD Community(Development ShapingA Better Community DATE: February 10,2004 TO: PER ATTACHED FROM: City of Tigard Planning Division STAFF CONTACT: Morgan Tracy,Associate Planner[x24281 Phone: [5031 639-4111/Fax: [5031684-1291 SITE DEVELOPMENT REVIEW[SORT 2003-00018 T-MOBILE WIRELESS MONOPOLE TOWER REQUEST: The applicant is requesting Site Development Review approval to construct a new wireless i communications facility consisting of a 100-foot monopole tower and BTS radio transmitting equipment cabinets mounted on the ground adjacent to the monopole. The proposed lease area will be placed within a fenced enclosure. LOCATION: 13680 SW Pacific Highway; WCTM 2S102CC, Tax Lot 1100. ZONE: C-G: General Commercial District. The C-G zoning district is designed to accommodate a full range of retail, office and civic uses with a city-wide and even regional trade area. Except where non- conforming, residential uses are limited to single-family residences which are located on the same site as a permitted use. A wide range of uses, including but not limited to adult entertainment, automotive equipment repair and storage, mini-warehouses, utilities, heliports, medical centers, major event entertainment, and gasoline stations, are permitted conditionally. APPLICABLE REVIEW CRITERIA: Community Development Code Chapters 18.370, 18.390, 18.520, 18.705, 18.730, 18.745, 18.765, 18.790, 18.795 and 18.798. Attached are the Site Plan, Vicinity Map and Applicant's Materials for your review. From information supplied by various departments and agencies and from other information available to our staff, a report and recommendation will be prepared and a decision will be rendered on the proposal in the near future. If you wish to comment on this application, WE NEED YOUR COMMENTS BACK BY: FEBRUARY 242 2004. You may use the space provided below or attach a separate letter to return your comments. If you are unable to respond by the above date, please phone the staff contact noted above with your comments and confirm your comments in writing as soon as possible. If you have any questions, contact the Tigard Planning Division, 13125 SW Hall Boulevard, Tigard, OR 97223. PLEASE CHECK THE FOLLOWING ITEMS THAT APPLY: We have reviewed the proposal and have no objections to it. _ Please contact of our office. Please refer to the enclosed letter. Written comments provided below: I Name & Number of Person Commenting: CITY TIGARD REQUEST FOR COM ,NTS 1 NOTIFICATION LIST FOR LAND USE COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT APPLICATIONS FILE NOS.: ', ,, (-)tr f a FILE NAME: T'I'IGL�f -. -re LC, to I v.✓e� CITIZEN INVOLVEMENT TEAMS 14-DAY PENDING APPLICATION NOTICE TO CIT AREA: ❑Central ❑East South ['West aProposal Descrip.in Library CIT Book CITY OFFICES -ONG RANGE PLANNING/Barbara Shields,Planning Mgr. _COMMUNITY DVLPMNT.DEPT./Planning-Engineering Techs. _VPOLICE DEPT./Jim Wolf,Crime Prevention Officer i -BUILDING DIVISION/Gary Lampella,Building Official ENGINEERING DEPT./Kim McMillan,Dvlpmnt,Review Engineer_WATER DEPT./Dennis Koellermeier,Public Works Mgr. -ITY ADMINISTRATION/Cathy Wheatley,City Recorder PUBLIC WORKS/John Roy,Property Manager ✓PUBLIC WORKS/Matt Stine,Urban Forester LANNER—POST PROJECT SITE IF A PUBLIC HEARING ITEM-1n BUSINESS DAYS PRIOR TO THE PUBLIC HEARINGI SPECIAL DISTRICTS _ TUAL.HILLS PARK&REC.DIST.*�UALATIN VALLEY FIRE&RESCUE* _ TUALATIN VALLEY WATER DISTRICT* V CLEANWATER SERVICES* Planning Manager Fire Marshall Administrative Office Lee Walker/SWM Program 15707 SW Walker Road Washington County Fire District PO Box 745 155 N.First Avenue Beaverton,OR 97006 (place in pick-up box) Beaverton,OR 97075 Hillsboro,OR 97124 LOCAL AND STATE JURISDICTIONS CITY OF BEAVERTON* _ CITY OF TUALATIN* _OR.DEPT.OF FISH&WILDLIFE _OR.DIV.OF STATE LANDS _ Planning Manager Planning Manager 2501 SW First Avenue Jennifer Goodridge _ Irish Bunnell,Development Services 18880 SW Martinazzi Avenue PO Box 59 775 Summer Street NE PO Box 4755 Tualatin,OR 97062 Portland,OR 97207 Salem,OR 97301-1279 Beaverton,OR 97076 _ OR.PUB.UTILITIES COMM. METRO-LAND USE&PLANNING * _OR.DEPT.OF GEO.&MINERAL IND. 550 Capitol Street NE _ CITY OF DURHAM * 600 NE Grand Avenue 800 NE Oregon Street,Suite 5 Salem,OR 97310-1380 City Manager Portland,OR 97232-2736 Portland,OR 97232 PO Box 23483 _ Bob Knight,Data Resource Center(ZCA) US ARMY CORPS.OF ENG. Durham,OR 97281-3483 _ Paulette Allen,Growth Management Coordinator _OR.DEPT.OF LAND CONSERV.&DVLP_Kathryn Harris _ Mel Huie,Greenspaces Coordinator(CPA(ZOA) Larry French(Comp.Plan Amendments Only) Routing CENWP-OP-G —CITY OF KING CITY * _ Jennifer Budhabhatti,Regional Planner(Wetlands) 635 Capitol Street NE,Suite 150 PO Box 2946 City Manager _ C.D. Manager,Growth Management Services Salem,OR 97301-2540 Portland,OR 97208-2946 15300 SW 116th Avenue King City,OR 97224 WASHINGTON COUNTY OR.DEPT.OF ENERGY(PowemnesinArea) t/OR.DEPT OF AVIATION(Monopole Towers) Dept.of Land Use&Transp. Bonneville Power Administration Tom Highland,Planning 155 N.First Avenue —CITY OF LAKE OSWEGO * Routing TTRC–Attn: Renae Ferrera 3040 25th Street,SE Suite 350,MS 13 Planning Director PO Box 3621 Salem,OR 97310 Hillsboro,OR 97124 PO Box 369 Portland,OR 97208-3621 _Brent Curtis(CPA) Lake Oswego,OR 97034 _Gregg Leion(cPA) _ OR.DEPT.OF ENVIRON.QUALITY(DEQ) ,ODOT,REGION 1 * _Anne LaMountain(IGANRB) _CITY OF PORTLAND (Notify for Wetlands and Potential Environmental Impacts) Marah Danielson,Development Review Coordinator _Phil Healy(IGA/URB) Planning Bureau Director Regional Administrator _Carl Toland, Right-of-Way Section(vacations) _Steve Conway(General Apps.) 1900 SW 4th Avenue,Suite 4100 2020 SW Fourth Avenue,Suite 400 123 NW Flanders _Sr.Cartographer(cPArrcA)MS,a Portland,OR 97201 Portland,OR 97201-4987 Portland,OR 97209-4037 _Jim Nims(ZCA)MS t5 _Doria Mateja(ZCA)Ms 14 1L/WA.CO.CONSOLIDATED COMMUNIC.AGENCY(WCCCA)"911"(Monopole Towers) _ODOT,REGION 1 -DISTRICT 2A Dave Austin Jane Estes,Permit Specialist PO Box 6375 5440 SW Westgate Drive,Suite 350 Beaverton,OR 97007-0375 Portland,OR 97221-2414 UTILITY PROVIDERS AND SPECIAL AGENCIES _PORTLAND WESTERN R/R, BURLINGTON NORTHERN/SANTA FE RJR,OREGON ELECTRIC R/R(Burlington Northern/Santa Fe RJR Predecessor) Robert I.Melbo,President&General Manager 110 W. 10th Avenue Albany,OR 97321 —SOUTHERN PACIFIC TRANS.CO.RJR _METRO AREA COMMUNICATIONS _COMCAST CABLE CORP. —TRI-MET TRANSIT DVLPMT. Clifford C.Cabe,Construction Engineer Debra Palmer(Annexations Only) Randy Bice (Sr Mep far Area Control) (If Project is Within Y.Mile of a Transit Route) 5424 SE McLoughlin Boulevard Twin Oaks Technology Center 14200 SW Brigadoon Court Ben Baldwin,Project Planner Portland,OR 97232 1815 NW 169th Place,S-6020 Beaverton,OR 97005 710 NE Holladay Street Beaverton,OR 97006-4886 Portland,OR 97232 _PORTLAND GENERAL ELECTRIC _NW NATURAL GAS COMPANY _VERIZON —QWEST COMMUNICATIONS Ken Gutierrez,Svc.Design Consultant Scott Palmer,Engineering Coord. Ken Perdue,Engineering Richard Jackson,Engineering 9480 SW Boeckman Road 220 NW Second Avenue PO Box 1100 8021 SW Capitol Hill Rd,Rm 110 Wilsonville,OR 97070 Portland,OR 97209-3991 Beaverton,OR 97075-1100 Portland,OR 97219 —TIGARD/TUALATIN SCHOOL DIST.#23J_BEAVERTON SCHOOL DIST.#48 _COMCAST CABLE CORP" _COMCAST CABLE CORP. Marsha Butler,Administrative Offices Jan Youngquist,Demographics Alex Silantiev(See My for Meet v y Diana Carpenter(App.E M HALM Msow) 6960 SW Sandburg Street 16550 SW Merlo Road 9605 SW Nimbus Avenue,Bldg. 12 3500 SW Bond Street Tigard,OR 97223-8039 Beaverton,OR 97006-5152 Beaverton,OR 97008 Portland,OR 97232 * INDICATES AUTOMATIC NOTIFICATION IN COMPLIANCE WITH INTERGOVERNMENTAL AGREEMENT IF WITHIN 500'OF THE SUBJECT PROPERTY FOR ANY/ALL CITY PROJECTS (Project Planner Is Responsible For Indicating Parties To Notify). h:\patty\maslers\Request For Comments Notification List.doc (UPDATED: 1-Dec-03) (Also update.-i)curpin\setup\labels\annexation_utilities and franchises doe"when updating this document) MAILING RECORDS • AFFIDAVIT OF MAILING CITY OF TIGARD Community(Development Shaping/7(Better Community I, cPatru-ia L. Luord being first duly sworn/affirm, on oath depose and say that I am a Senior Administrative Specialist for the City of r igar , Washington County, Oregon and that I served the following: (Check Appropriate Box(s)Below) E21 NOTICE OF DECISION FOR: SDR2003-00018/T-MOBILE WIRELESS COMMUNICATIONS MONOPOLE TOWER ❑ AMENDED NOTICE (File No/Name Reference) ® City of Tigard Planning Director A copy of the said notice being hereto attached, marked Exhibit"A", and by reference made a part hereof, was mailed to each named person(s) at the address(s) shown on the attached list(s), marked Exhibit"B". and by reference made a part hereof, on February 25,2004, and deposited in the United States Mail on February 25,2004, postage prepaid. / .4. - 4 _■RiatditAlj9 (Person that Pre' red Notice) ' STATE OT ogiggav ) County of Washington )ss City of Twanf ) • Subscribed and sworn/affirmed before me on the 02 7 day of , 2004. 1 - OFFICIAL SEAL ��'� c'C' J BENGTSON NOTARY PUBLIC-OREGON 1 COMMISSION NO.368086 NO BY PUBLIC I EGON MY COMMISSION EXPIRES APR.27,2007 �`~�~~��~��.`-`�1�� My Commission Expires: `-//)"7 EXHIBIT A NOTICE OF TYPE II DECISION SITE DEVELOPMENT REVIEW (SDR) 2003-00018 CITY OF TIGARD Community cDeve(opment T-MOBILE COMMUNICATIONS MONOPOLE TOWER ShapingA(Better Community 120 DAYS = 5/25/2004 SECTION I. APPLICATION SUMMARY FILE NAME: T-MOBILE WIRELESS COMMUNICATIONS MONOPOLE TOWER CASE NO.: Site Development Review (SDR) SDR2003-00018 PROPOSAL: The applicant is proposing to construct a 100-foot tall monopole tower. The associated accessory equipment will be placed within a fenced enclosure. APPLICANT: T-Mobile Wireless OWNER: Tigard Lodge #207 of AF & AM Attn: Jim Barta P.O. Box 230184 1500 NE Irving Street, Suite 530 Portland, OR 97281 Portland, OR 97232 LOCATION: 13680 SW Pacific Highway; WCTM 2S102CC, Tax Lot 1100. ZONE: C-G: General Commercial District. The C-G zoning district is designed to accommodate a full range of retail, office and civic uses with a city-wide and even regional trade area. APPLICABLE REVIEW CRITERIA: Community Development Code Chapters 18.390, 18.520, 18.705, 18.730, 18.745, 18.765, 18.780, 18.790, 18.795, 18.798 and 18.810. SECTION II . DECISION Notice is hereby given that the City of Tigard Community Development Director's designee has APPROVED the above request subject to certain conditions of approval. The findings and conclusions on which the decision is based are noted in the full decision, available at City Hall. THIS APPROVAL SHALL BE VALID FOR 18 MONTHS FROM THE EFFECTIVE DATE OF THIS DECISION. All documents and applicable criteria in the above-noted file are available for inspection at no cost or copies can be obtained for twenty-five cents (25 ) per page, or the current rate charged for copies at the time of the request. SECTION III. PROCEDURE AND APPEAL INFORMATION Notice: Notice mailed to: X The applicant and owners X Owner of record within the required distance X Affected government agencies Final Decision: THIS DECISION IS FINAL ON FEBRUARY 25, 2004 AND BECOMES EFFECTIVE ON MARCH 11, 2004 UNLESS AN APPEAL IS FILED. AAp e�al: The Director's Decision is final on the date that it is mailed. All persons entitled to notice or who are otherwise adversely affected or aggrieved by the decision as provided in Section 18.390.040.G.1 may appeal this decision in accordance with Section 18.390.040.G.2 of the Tigard Community Development Code which provides that a written appeal together with the required fee shall be filed with the Director within ten (10) business days of the date the Notice of Decision was mailed. The appeal fee schedule and forms are available from the Planning Division of Tigard City Hall, 13125 SW Hall Boulevard, Tigard, Oregon 97223. Unless the applicant is the appellant, the hearing on an appeal from the Director's Decision shall be confined to the specific issues identified in the written comments submitted by the parties during the comment period. Additional evidence concerning issues properly raised in the Notice of Appeal may be submitted by any party during the appeal hearing, subject to any additional rules of procedure that may be adopted from time to time by the appellate body. THE DEADLINE FOR FILING AN APPEAL IS 5:00 PM ON MARCH 10, 2004. Questions: For further information please contact the Planning Division Staff Planner, Morgan Tracy at (503) 639-4171, Tigard City Hall, 13125 SW Hall Boulevarrdd, Tigard, Oregon 97223. / / CITY of TIGARD RA a j j4.�.� - , - l I 1 1J �, 1., VICINITY-1:--- �Q1f / __LLj _ ■SDR2003-00018 ■JJ t •"- --- -1 ,T-MOBILE WIRELESS ST (MONOPOLE TOWER r--, I - li— u . J —` �� piatw? / ,11K, 11_LI,: 1:- — I: L L j--- I II 1 . riiii — — l VIEW sr �, L ;. ti �.-_ ■ City ofTipd 1 Tairi ....._. , _ :" i _ - ww.w..rw.wrw.rrw El —.T,E /* 44bk--4,-, (Fr II 4_ \ M'NOM MP / �` Mora... .eexr.,-"'-- - >n.,rc....r ave �e ' ‘;49 i/il ill 1 ;, _ F3. K b I a ^r' ==s. kvx- CITY OF TIGARD t SDR2003-00018 SITE PLAN N T-MOBILE WIRELESS MONOPOLE TOWER (Map Is not to scale) 44/10, \\ 3�'2NSCTS`7rS.T5tC. 7'3�CCLT.."i,, -'— . ,,i o Sm aa1Si.�r�..=• mow..�.°...3 , phi �/ •F�.lidie/ \\` r = J ...w.� •r... 1, CITY OF TIGARD I SDR2003.00018 SITE PLAN N T-MOBILE WIRELESS MONOPOLE TOWER (Map is not to scale) 2S102CC-00500 2S10300-00800 EXHIBIT.. 13500 PACIFIC CORP D W SIVERS CO BY CAPOZZOLI ADVISORY FOR 4730 SW MACADAM AVE SUITE 101 PENSIONS INC PORTLAND,OR 97201 21500 HAGGERTY ROAD SUITE 100 NORTHVILLE, MI 48167 2S103DA-06200 2S102CC-03500 BLAIR BARRY V&LINDA F DAVIS STEPHEN GROMER 13490 SW WATKINS AVE 10315 SW MCDONALD ST TIGARD. OR 97223 TIGARD,OR 97224 2S102CC-01700 2S102CC-00600 BRITTAIN FRANCIS L TRUST DDHK VENTURES LLC 10285 SW HILLVIEW 12604 SW 60TH CT TIGARD, OR 97223 PORTLAND, OR 97219 2S102CC-08500 2S102CC-00701 C H S INVESTMENT CO DDHK VENTURES LLC PMB 186 12604 SW 60TH CT 2020-C 8TH AVE PORTLAND, OR 97219 WEST LINN, OR 97068 2S102CC-02000 2S103DD-01201 CABE CLIFFORD C&SHARON M DICKERHOOF M EUGENE/NOREEN& 10195 SW HILLVIEW ST DICKERHOOF DARREN E& TIGARD,OR 97223 DICKERHOOF MATTHEW G PO BOX 1583 CORVALLIS,OR 97339 2S102CC-08400 2S102CC-01600 CAPRI MICHAEL J DORTON MARGIE E BY CHS INVESTMENTS 10315 SW HILLVIEW ST PMB 186 TIGARD,OR 97223 2020-C 8TH AVE WEST LINN, OR 97068 2 S 103 D D-00200 2 S 102C C-03001 CEARLEY DARRELL A& FAGAN BETSY ANGELA M 10350 SW HILLVIEW ST 13530 SW WATKINS AVE TIGARD,OR 97223 TIGARD, OR 97223 2S103DD-00433 2S103DD-00700 CHAMBERLAIN JOHN A AND GILBERTSON LLOYD DEBRA A DARLENE J 10710 SW FAIRHAVEN WAY 15980 SW COLONY PLACE TIGARD, OR 97223 TIGARD,OR 97223 2S 102CC-08300 2S1 02C C-02600 CHS INVESTMENTS CO GILL EDWARD W& PMB 186 CORYELL JANET L 2020-C 8TH AVE 13885 SW 102ND AVE WEST LINN, OR 97068 TIGARD,OR 97223 2S1030D-00300 2S103DD-00432 COLLINS LEEANNE& HAMMES DAVID A AND RAMIREZ KEVIN VICKE S 13570 SW WATKINS AVE 10740 SW FAIRHAVEN WAY TIGARD, OR 97223 TIGARD,OR 97223 2S102CC-03400 2S102CC-08200 HAMPTON DANIEL L&CHERISSE M MERCADO PEDRO R&ANA M L 10345 SW MCDONALD 13915 SW 104TH AVE TIGARD,OR 97224 TIGARD,OR 97223 2S102CC-01800 2S102CC-03302 HART JAMES A VIRGINIA A MORRIS MICHAEL D&LINDA B 10255 SW HILLVIEW DRIVE 10375 SW MCDONALD ST TIGARD, OR 97223 TIGARD,OR 97223 2S102CC-00700 2S102CC-03300 HORTON DENNIS M&ELISABETH A MORRIS MICHAEL D& LINDA B 19220 VIEW DR 10375 SW MCDONALD ST WEST LINN, OR 97068 TIGARD,OR 97223 2 S 102 CC-08100 2 S 102C C-02800 HOUSING AUTHORITY OF MULLINS MICHAEL C&JUDITH E WASHINGTON COUNTY 10330 SW HILLVIEW 111 NE LINCOLN ST#200-L TIGARD,OR 97223 HILLSBORO. OR 97124 2S102CC-01200 2S102CC-02500 INTERNATIONAL CHURCH OF THE FOUR NELSON WILLARD&ALICE 1910 W SUNSET BLVD#200 TRUSTEES LOS ANGELES, CA 90026 13900 SW 102ND TIGARD,OR 97223 2S102CC-02900 2S103DD-00401 JOHNSON GLORIA JEAN OWENS JOHN W&DEBORAH A 10290 SW HILLVIEW ST 13525 SW WATKINS TIGARD, OR 97223 TIGARD,OR 97223 2S102CC-07700 2S102CC-03600 KAUFMAN KARL G&TERESA M PECK ALAN W& 10385 SW HILLVIEW RATHBUN ELIZABETH A TIGARD, OR 97224 13995 SW 102ND AVE TIGARD,OR 97223 2S102CC-01000 2S102CB-01800 KUBIN CARON PUBLIC STORAGE 520 SW 6TH AVE#400 INSTITUTIONAL FUND PORTLAND, OR 97204 DEPT PT-OR26410 PO BOX 25025 GLENDALE,CA 91201 2S103DD-00437 2S103DD-00900 LOUCKS HARLOW C&COLLEEN REORGANIZED CHURCH OF JESUS 13605 SW WATKINS AVE CHRIST OF LATTER DAY SAINTS TIGARD, OR 97223 BY COMMUNITY OF CHRIST 13855 SW PACIFIC HWY TIGARD,OR 97223 2S102CC-08700 2S102CC-01400 MAYFIELD ROBERT R II RIPLEY GLENN D AND PENNY G DRIFTLAAN 33 10375 SW HILLVIEW ST BLARICUM, NE 1261JH TIGARD,OR 97223 2S1 02C C-01500 2S 102CC-08600 RISING ROBERT& UNVERZAGT AARIC D& RISING VICKI B ELEANOR 10345 SW HILLVIEW ST 13845 SW 104TH TIGARD, OR 97223 TIGARD,OR 97223 2S102CC-03000 2S102CC-01900 SHEHORN LINDA K UPHOFF ELNOR ANN& 10360 SW HILLVIEW ST RICHARD C TRUSTEES TIGARD, OR 97223 10225 SW HILL VIEW ST TIGARD,OR 97223 2S103DD-00402 2S102CC-00802 SPANIOL MICHAEL R&CAROLYN S UPHOFF RICHARD C AND ELNOR ANN 10605 SW FAIRHAVEN ST 10225 SW HILL VIEW ST TIGARD, OR 97223 TIGARD,OR 97223 2S102CC-03301 2S102CC-08000 SPECIALIZED HOUSING INC VANDENBOS TIMOTHY TR 5319 SW WESTGATE DR#124 10415 SW HILLVIEW ST PORTLAND, OR 97221 TIGARD,OR 97223 2S102CC-07900 2S103DD-00100 SPENCE GEORGIA V VITIRITTI PIETRO& PASQUALINA 10405 SW HILLVIEW ST TRUSTEES TIGARD.OR 97223 14115 SW 157TH TIGARD,OR 97224 2S103DD-00435 2S103DD-00436 STEVENS WILLIAM A&SARAH E WARD MARION M 10650 SW FAIRHAVEN ST 10600 SW FAIRHAVEN TIGARD. OR 97223 TIGARD,OR 97223 2S102CC-08900 2S102CC-03200 STILES DIANNE D WESTOVER PHILIP S AND 13947 SW 104TH AVE CHRISTINE M TIGARD, OR 97224 10340 SW HILLVIEW ST TIGARD,OR 97223 2S1 02C C-02700 251030D-00500 TAYLOR PETER H B J WILSON'S TIGARD RETAIL CENTER IN 13965 SW 102ND BY OCM ESCROW ADMINISTRATION TIGARD, OR 97223 MAILROOM/ESCROW 1717 MAIL ST 8TH FLOOR DALLAS,TX 75201 2S103DD-00600 2S103DD-00400 TIGARD GRANGE NO. 148 WILSON'S TIGARD RETAIL CENTER IN BY PHILIP R.YOUNT TREASURER BY OCM ESCROW ADMINISTRATION 11222 COTTONWOOD LANE MAILROOM/ESCROW TIGARD,OR 97223 1717 MAIL ST 8TH FLOOR DALLAS,TX 75201 2S102CC-01100 2S1 o2CC-07800 TIGARD LODGE NO 207 WOOD KATHERINE M OF AF &AM 10395 SW HILLVIEW ST ATTN JOHN HAVERY SECY TIGARD,OR 97223 P 0 BOX 230184 TIGARD,OR 97281 2S 103DD-00434 ZANDONATTI ALLEN F 10680 SW FAIRHAVEN WAY TIGARD,OR 97223 Jack Biethan John Frewing 11023 SW Summerfield Drive, #4 7110 SW Lola Lane Tigard, OR 97224 Tigard, OR 97223 Kristen Miller CPO 4B 8940 SW Edgewood Street 16200 SW Pacific Highway, Suite H242 Tigard, OR 97223 Tigard, OR 97224 Paul Owen 10335 SW Highland Drive Tigard, OR 97224 Tim Esau PO Box 230695 Tigard, OR 97281 Nathan and Ann Murdock PO Box 231265 Tigard, OR 97281 Ross Sundberg 16382 SW 104th Avenue Tigard, OR 97224 Brian Wegener 9830 SW Kimberly Drive Tigard, OR 97224 J. Dyar 10430 SW Century Oak Drive Tigard, OR 97224 Rex Caffall 13205 SW Village Glenn Tigard, OR 97223 Josh Thomas 10395 SW Bonanza Tigard, OR 97224 CITY OF TIGARD - SOUTH (IT SUBCOMMITTEE (pg. I of I) (i:\curpin\setup\labels\CIT South.doc) UPDATED: 15-Jan-04 AFFIDAVIT OF MAILING AIII CITY OF TIGARD Community Development Shaping Better Community I, Patricia L. Lansford, being first duly sworn/affirm, on oath depose and say that I am a Senior Administrative Specialist for the City of Tigard, 'Washington County, Oregon and that I served the following: �Cnecl.Appropnate BoxtS)Below/ © NOTICE OF DECISION FOR: SDR2003-00018/T-MOBILE WIRELESS COMMUNICATIONS MONOPOLE TOWER ❑ AMENDED NOTICE (File No./Name Reference) City of Tigard Planning Director A copy of the said notice being hereto attached, marked Exhibit"A", and by reference made a part hereof, was mailed to each named person(s) at the address(s) shown on the attached list(s), marked Exhibit"B",and by reference made a part hereof, on February 25,2004, and deposited in the United States Mail on February 25,2004, postage prepaid. _ (Person-mat P -pared Notice STATE OAF OREGON ) Coun off Washington )ss. City of Trganf ) Subscribed and sworn/affirmed before me on the 7 day of Arl;Lvi , 2004. OFFICIAL SEAL �.� ,; J BENGTSON % �j 'f NOTARY PUBLIC OREGON • 410 6 MY COILISS Mx IR S APR 27,2007 ) 110 Y PUBLIC OF OR !- 1N My Commission Expires: • / EXHIBIT A NOTICE OF TYPE II DECISION SITE DEVELOPMENT REVIEW (SDR) 2003-00018 CITY OF TIGARD T-MOBILE COMMUNICATIONS MONOPOLE TOWER Community Devc� vuu u Shaping Better Comm unity 120 DAYS = 5/25/2004 SECTION I. APPLICATION SUMMARY FILE NAME: T-MOBILE WIRELESS COMMUNICATIONS MONOPOLE TOWER CASE NO.: Site Development Review (SDR) SDR2003-00018 PROPOSAL: The applicant is proposing to construct a 100-foot tall monopole tower. The associated accessory equipment will be placed within a fenced enclosure. APPLICANT: T-Mobile Wireless OWNER: Tigard Lodge #207 of AF & AM Attn: Jim Barta P.O. Box 230184 1500 NE Irving Street, Suite 530 Portland, OR 97281 Portland, OR 97232 LOCATION: 13680 SW Pacific Highway; WCTM 2S102CC, Tax Lot 1100. ZONE: C-G: General Commercial District. The C-G zoning district is designed to accommodate a full range of retail, office and civic uses with a city-wide and even regional trade area. APPLICABLE REVIEW CRITERIA: Community Development Code Chapters 18.390, 18.520, 18.705, 18.730, 18.745, 18.765, 18.780, 18.790, 18.795, 18.798 and 18.810. SECTION II. DECISION Notice is hereby given that the City of Tigard Community Development Director's designee has APPROVED the above requt; Subject to certain conditions of airevaI. The findings and conclusions on which the decision is based are noted in Section VI. OF TYPE II DECISION SDR2003-00018/T-MOBILE COMMUNICATIONS MONOPOLE PAGE 1 OF 21 CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL THE FOLLOWING CONDITIONS SHALL BE SATISFIED PRIOR TO THE ISSUANCE OF SITE/BUILDING PERMITS: Submit to the Planning Division (Morgan Tracy, 503=639-4TTT, ext. 2428) for review and approval: 1. Prior to issuance of site or building permits, the applicant shall provide staff with a noise study from a certified consultant or acoustical engineer that illustrates a design that ensures that any noise creating device used by the project does not exceed the allowable levels in TDC Section 18.798.060(B)(8). The study shall be governed by the prescribed techniques in TMC Section 7.40.140. The projects accessory systems must be constructed to meet the prescribed standards and shall be so reflected in the construction drawings. 2. Prior to issuance of site or building permits, the applicant/owner shall provide satisfactory legal evidence, in the form of deeds, easements, leases or contracts to establish the joint access. 3. Prior to issuance of site or building permits, the applicant/owner shall provide a revised site or landscape plan that shows: A. The addition of two medium to large sized street trees (minimum 2-inch caliper size at planting) along SW Pacific Highway, as approved by the City Forester. B. The plan shall also include a hedge of narrow or broad leaf evergreen shrubs in the areas with gaps along the southern boundary which will form a continuous screen of the height specified in Table 18.745.2 within two years of planting. C. A minimum of four additional evergreen trees, 15 feet in height at time of planting. These trees may be used as part of the screening of residential properties to the south (additional evergreens may be necessary to fully form the continuous hedge as described). 4. Prior to issuance of site or building permits, the applicant/owner shall submit a revised site plan that shows a minimum of 30 feet between the proposed utility trenches and any existing tree in excess of 12 inches diameter. This plan shall also indicate that "Should encroachments into this 30-foot zone be necessary, the applicant shall consult with and obtain the City Forester's approval prior to commencing work." THE FOLLOWING CONDITIONS SHALL BE SATISFIED PRIOR TO A FINAL BUILDING INSPECTION: Submit to the Planning Division (Morgan Tracy, 503-639-4171, ext. 2428) for review and approval: 5. Prior to final building inspection, the applicant shall ensure that the additional landscaping materials, as conditioned have been installed. Staff shall perform a site inspection to ensure that gaps in the screening along the southern boundary have been adequately planted. 6. Prior to final building inspection, the applicant shall provide documentation confirming that the noise levels in decibel ratings for the proposed radio cabinets are below 50 dBA (day)/40 dBA(night) measured at the property line. 7. Prior to final building inspection, the applicant shall ensure that a security light or motion detector light is installed to illuminate the rear of the property. This light shall be shielded to prevent light trespass onto adjacent properties. THIS APPROVAL SHALL BE VALID FOR EIGHTEEN (18) MONTHS FROM THE EFFECTIVE DATE OF THIS DECISION. NOTICE OF TYPE II DECISION SDR2003-00018/T-MOBILE COMMUNICATIONS MONOPOLE PAGE 2 OF 21 SECTION III. BACKGROUND INFORMATION Site History: Staff conducted a search of city records for the subject property. Apart from building and mechanical permits unrelated to the present request, no land use cases were found. The parcel is oriented at an angle but is roughly rectangular in shape. The adjacent property to the northeast is zoned C-G and is developed with multi-family units. The property to the southwest is also zoned C-G and is occupied by a religious institutional use. To the northwest is the property's frontage along SW Pacific Highway with commercial uses across the road. To the southeast and south are single-family properties in an R-3.5 zone. Vicinity Information: The subject site is located between McDonald Street and Garrett Street, on the east side of SW Pacific Highway, south of the Haagens Shopping Center. Site Information and Proposal Description: The applicant is proposing to construct a 100-foot-tall monopole tower for wireless communications service. SECTION IV. COMMENTS FROM PROPERTY OWNERS WITHIN 500 FEET One phone call was received from John Frewing, inquiring whether the proposed tower height exceeded the height limit in the zone. Staff explained that such structures are exempt from underlying zone height limits, and that the proposal was consistent with the type of review which required a Type II Site Development Review as it did not exceed 100 feet for a single user. SECTION V. SUMMARY OF APPLICABLE REVIEW CRITERIA The proposal's consistency with these Code Chapters is reviewed in the following sections: A. Zoning Districts 18.530 (Industrial Zoning Districts) B. Applicable Development Code Standards 18.705 Access Egress and Circulation) 18.745 Landscaping and Screening) 18.765 Off-Street parking and loading requirements) 18.780 Signs) 18.795 Visual Clearance) 18.798 Wireless Communication Facilities) C. Specific DR Approval Criteria 18.360 D. Street and Utility Improvement Standards 18.810 E. Impact Study 18.390 SECTION VI. APPLICABLE DEVELOPMENT CODE STANDARDS A. ZONIING DISTRICT Industrial Zoning District: Section 18.530.020 Lists the description of the Industrial Zoning Districts. The site is located in the C-G: General Commercial District. The proposed use, a Wireless Communications Facility, is permitted in this zone subject to the limitations of Chapter 18.798. NOTICE OF TYPE II DECISION SDR2003-00018/T-MOBILE COMMUNICATIONS MONOPOLE PAGE 3 OF 21 Development Standards: Section 18.530.040.B States that Development standards in commercial zoning districts are contained in Table 18.520.2 below: TABLE 18.520.2 DEVELOPMENT STANDARDS IN INDUSTRIAL ZONES STANDARD C-G Proposed Minimum Lot Size None 36,846 sq. ft. - Detached unit - - Boarding, lodging, rooming house Minimum Lot Width 50 ft 104 ft. Minimum Setbacks - Front yard 0 ft. 201' -Side facing street on corner&through lots - - -Side yard 0 ft [1] 41'168' -Side or rear yard abutting more restrictive zoning district - - Rear yard 20 ft [1] 83'6" - Distance between front of garage & property line abutting a public or - - private street. - Distance between tower and off-site residence (18.798.050) [2] 100% (100') 101' Maximum Height N/A[3] 20 ft. Maximum Site Coverage [4] 85% 75 Minimum Landscape Requirement 15% 25% [1]no setback shall be required except 20 feet shall be required where the zone abuts a residential zone. [2]Not part of this table,but included here for reference. [3]Per 18.730,towers are not subject to the height limitations of the title. The height of the tower determines the type of review per 18.798. [3]includes all buildings and impervious area The site is comprised of a single masonry building in the rear of the property with parking located up front. There are residential structures to the northeast, but they are not within a residential zone. The only areas where the more restrictive zoning district standards apply is to the south. The applicant's proposal is in compliance with the underlying zone requirements. FINDING: Based on the analysis above, the underlying zone's development criteria have been satisfied. B. APPLICABLE DEVELOPMENT CODE STANDARDS The Site Development Review approval standards require that a development proposal be found to be consistent with the various standards of the Community Development Code. Access, Egress and Circulation (18.705): Access plan: No building or other permit shall be issued until scaled plans are presented and approved as provided by this chapter that show how access, egress and circulation requirements are to be fulfilled. The applicant shall submit a site plan. The Director shall provide the applicant with detailed information about this submission requirement. The applicant has provided scaled plans showing access, egress and circulation for the proposed monopole from SW Pacific Highway, which is a public street. Joint access: Owners of two or more uses, structures, or parcels of land may agree to utilize jointly the same access and egress when the combined access and egress of both uses, structures, or parcels of land satisfies the combined requirements as designated in this title, provided: Satisfactory legal evidence shall be presented in the form of deeds, easements, leases or contracts to establish the joint use; and copies of the deeds, easements, leases or contracts are placed on permanent file with the City. NOTICE OF TYPE II DECISION SDR2003-00018/T-MOBILE COMMUNICATIONS MONOPOLE PAGE 4 OF 21 The applicant has proposed to utilize the existing site access and jointly share the driveway to the wireless communication facility site. An access easement will be required. Public street access: All vehicular access and egress as required in Sections 18.705.030H and 18.705.0301 shall connect directly with a public or private street approved by the City for public use and shall be maintained at the required standards on a continuous basis. The subject site is accessible from SW Pacific Highway, an improved public street that meets standards for public streets. Curb cuts: Curb cuts shall be in accordance with Section 18.810.030N: Concrete curbs, curb cuts, wheelchair, bicycle ramps and driveway approaches shall be constructed in accordance with standards specified in this chapter and Section 15.04.080: Concrete curbs and driveway approaches are required; except where no sidewalk is planned, an asphalt approach may be constructed with City Engineer approval and Asphalt and concrete driveway approaches to the property line shall be built to City configuration standards. The applicant proposes to utilize the existing curb cut and driveway apron, which conform to city standards. Walkways: On-site pedestrian walkways shall comply with the following standards: Walkways shall extend from the ground floor entrances or from the ground floor landing of stairs, ramps, or elevators of all commercial, institutional, and industrial uses, to the streets which provide the required access and egress. Walkways shall provide convenient connections between buildings in multi-building commercial, institutional, and industrial complexes. Unless impractical, walkways shall be constructed between new and existing developments and neighboring developments; The proposed facility is a non-inhabited structure and will be fenced off separately from the rest of the site for security purposes. Existing rights-of-way provide adequate pedestrian access to the site. Wherever required walkways cross vehicle access driveways or parking lots, such crossings shall be designed and located for pedestrian safety. Required walkways shall be physically separated from motor vehicle traffic and parking by either a minimum 6-inch vertical separation (curbed) or a minimum 3-foot horizontal separation, except that pedestrian crossings of traffic aisles are permitted for distances no greater than 36 feet if appropriate landscaping, pavement markings, or contrasting pavement materials are used. Walkways shall be a minimum of four feet in width, exclusive of vehicle overhangs and obstructions such as mailboxes, benches, bicycle racks, and sign posts, and shall be in compliance with ADA standards; There are no walkways proposed, therefore, this standard is met. Required walkways shall be paved with hard surfaced materials such as concrete, asphalt, stone, brick, etc. Walkways may be required to be lighted and/or signed as needed for safety purposes. Soft-surfaced public use pathways may be provided only if such pathways are provided in addition to required pathways. There are no walkways proposed, therefore, this standard is met. Minimum Access Requirements for Commercial and Industrial Use: Section 18.705.030.1 provides the minimum access requirements for commercial and industrial uses: Table 18.705.3 indicates that the required access width for developments with 0-99 parking spaces is one 30-foot accesses with 24 feet of pavement. Vehicular access shall be provided to commercial or industrial uses, and NOTICE OF TYPE II DECISION SDR2 0 0 3-000 1 8/T-MOBILE COMMUNICATIONS MONOPOLE PAGE 5 OF 21 shall be located within 50 feet of the primary ground floor entrances; additional requirements for truck traffic may be placed as conditions of site development review. The site has its primary access from SW Pacific Highway which is greater than 30 feet wide with more than 24 feet of pavement. The proposed development will not affect any change to the existing primary access point, which is in conformance with the code. One-way vehicular access points: Where a proposed parking facility indicates only one-way traffic flow on the site, it shall be accommodated by a specific driveway serving the facility; the entrance drive shall be situated closest to oncoming traffic and the exit drive shall be situated farthest from oncoming traffic. The existing primary access accommodates two-way traffic The Director has the authority to restrict access when the need to do so is dictated by one or more of the following conditions: To provide for increased traffic movement on congested streets and to eliminate turning movement problems, the Director may restrict the location of driveways on streets and require the location of driveways be placed on adjacent streets, upon the finding that the proposed access would: • Cause or increase existing hazardous traffic conditions; or • Provide inadequate access for emergency vehicles; or • Cause hazardous conditions to exist which would constitute a clear and present danger to the public health, safety, and general welfare. To eliminate the need to use public streets for movements between commercial or industrial properties, parking areas shall be designed to connect with parking areas on adjacent properties unless not feasible. The Director shall require access easements between properties where necessary to provide for parking area connections; To facilitate pedestrian and bicycle traffic, access and parking area plans shall provide efficient sidewalk andlor pathway connections, as feasible, between neighboring developments or land uses; The existing access meets present city standards and affords good visibility in both directions of SW Pacific Highway. The proposed development will add two (2) trips per month. There is no need to place further restrictions on this access. An existing connection between parking areas on the subject site to the church on the south is in place. The property to the north is residentially used and therefore, not subject to this connection requirement. This standard is satisfied. FINDING: Based on the analysis above, the Access, Egress and Circulation standards have not been fully met, however by imposing the following condition, these standards will be satisfied. CONDITION: The applicant/owner shall provide satisfactory legal evidence, in the form of deeds, easements, leases or contracts to establish the joint access. Environmental Performance Standards (18.725) The purpose of these provisions is to apply the federal and state environmental laws, rules and regulations to development within the City of Tigard. These requirements are intended to prevent or mitigate for adverse environmental impacts to offsite properties from noise, visible emissions, vibration, odors, insects and rodents, and glare and heat. NOTICE OF TYPE II DECISION SDR2003-00018/T-MOBILE COMMUNICATIONS MONOPOLE PAGE 6 OF 21 The proposed wireless communication facility utilizes small self-contained cabinets for radio equipment. These units typically contain air conditioning units which are the primary source of sound generation. The applicant has included a noise study that analyzed equipment used at a different site in the county. That study is not relevant to this application, as the type of equipment is not indicated (and hence cannot be assumed to be identical), as well as the study is based on existing ambient noise levels for a site that is not in the immediate vicinity of the subject site. Moreover, the distances from the property line used to determine the sound levels do not match the circumstances in this proposal. The use does not generate trash, sewage, wastewater, vibration, odors, or visible emissions. As there will be no trash accumulation, there should be no harboring of insects or rodents. The dull galvanized color will minimize glare. FINDING: The applicant has not factually confirmed that the noise levels will be met at the property line with the proposed generator design. CONDITION: Prior to any site work, the applicant shall provide staff with a noise study from a certified consultant that illustrates a design that ensures that any noise creating device used by the project does not exceed the allowable levels in TDC Section 18.798.060(B)(8). The study shall be governed by the prescribed techniques in TMC Section 7.40.140. The projects accessory systems must be constructed to meet the prescribed standards. Landscaping and Screening (18.745): Street Trees: Section 18.745.040 states that all development projects fronting on a public street or a private drive more than 100 feet in length shall be required to plant street trees in accordance with Section 18.745.040.0 Section 18.745.040.0 requires that street trees be spaced between 20 and 40 feet apart depending on the size classification of the tree at maturity (small, medium or large). This development fronts a public street and is, therefore, required to have street trees. There are two trees along the public right-of-way that serve as street trees, however, the site is deficient in the number of street trees provided. The applicant will need to submit a revised landscape plan showing the addition of two trees along the public street frontage. The trees should be medium to large size species, subject to the City Forester's approval. Buffering and Screening: Section 18.745.050 states that buffering, but not screening is required between abutting uses that are of a different type when the uses are separated by a street. No buffer or screening is required between similar uses. The proposed use is located centrally within the commercial property. As such, no buffering and screening is required as the parent parcel and the applicants proposed uses are similar. Buffering exists between the Masonic lodge and the apartments to the north, as well as screening that is present to the homes on the south. Screening: Special P-rovisions: Section 18.745.050.E requires the screening of parking and loading areas. Landscaped parking areas shall include special design features which effectively screen the parking lot areas from view. Planting materials to be installed should achieve a relative balance between low lying and vertical shrubbery and trees. Trees shall be planted in landscaped islands in all parking areas, and shall be equally distributed on the basis of one (1) tree for each seven (7) parking spaces in order to provide a canopy effect. The minimum dimension on the landscape islands shall be three (3) feet wide and the landscaping shall be protected from vehicular damage by some form of wheel guard or curb. NOTICE OF TYPE II DECISION SDR2003-000181T-MOBILE COMMUNICATIONS MONOPOLE PAGE 7 OF 21 The proposed use does not require additional parking. There is screening provided for the existing parking lot but there are a couple of spots where the materials that make up the hedge have died or have been removed. The applicant is required to supplement the plantings along the southern boundary. Screening Of Service Facilities. Except for one-family and two-family dwellings, any refuse container or disposal area and service facilities such as gas meters and air conditioners which would otherwise be visible from a public street, customer or resident parking area, any public facility or any residential area shall be screened from view by placement of a solid wood fence or masonry wall between five and eight feet in height. All refuse materials shall be contained within the screened area; Service facilities are not needed for the proposed use, and have not been proposed. FINDING: Based on the analysis above, the landscaping and screening standards of this section have not been met. There are insufficient street trees, and there is a small gap in the required screening along the southern property boundary. CONDITION: The applicant/owner shall provide a revised site or landscape plan that shows: A. The addition of two medium to large sized street trees (minimum 2-inch caliper size at planting) along SW Pacific Highway, as approved by the City Forester. B. The plan shall also include a hedge of narrow or broad leaf evergreen shrubs in the areas with gaps along the southern boundary which will form a continuous screen of the height specified in Table 18.745.2 within two years of planting. C. Such street trees and evergreen hedge plants shall be installed prior to final building inspection. Mixed Solid Waste and Recyclables Storage (18.755): Chapter 18.755 requires that new construction incorporates functional and adequate space for on-site storage and efficient collection of mixed solid waste and source separated Recyclables prior to pick-up and removal by haulers. The applicant must choose one (1) of the following four (4) methods to demonstrate compliance: Minimum Standard, Waste Assessment, Comprehensive Recycling Plan, or Franchised Hauler Review and Sign-Off. The applicant will have to submit evidence or a plan which indicates compliance with this section. Regardless of which method chosen, the applicant will have to submit a written sign-off from the franchise hauler regarding the facility location and compatibility. No mixed solid waste collection or recyclables storage is needed for this use. No changes to the site's existing refuse collection area are proposed. Location Standards. To encourage its use, the storage area for source-separated recyclable shall be co- located with the storage area for residual mixed solid waste; indoor and outdoor storage areas shall comply with Uniform Building and Fire Code requirements; Storage area space requirements can be satisfied with a single location or multiple locations, and can combine both interior and exterior locations; Exterior storage areas can be located within interior side yard or rear yard areas. Exterior storage areas shall not be located within a required front yard setback or in a yard adjacent to a public or private street; Exterior storage areas shall be located in central and visible locations on a site to enhance security for users; Exterior storage areas can be located in a parking area if the proposed use provides at least the minimum number of parking spaces required for the use after deducting the area used for storage. Storage areas shall be appropriately screened according to the provisions in 18.755.050 C, design standards; The storage area shall be accessible for collection vehicles and located so that the storage area will not obstruct pedestrian or vehicle traffic movement on the site or on public streets adjacent to the site. NOTICE OF TYPE II DECISION SDR2003-000181T-MOBILE COMMUNICATIONS MONOPOLE PAGE 8 OF 21 No mixed solid waste collection or recyclables storage is needed for this use. Therefore, this standard is met. Design Standards. The dimensions of the storage area shall accommodate containers consistent with current methods of local collection; Storage containers shall meet Uniform Fire Code standards and be made and covered with waterproof materials or situated in a covered area; Exterior storage areas shall be enclosed by a sight-obscuring fence wall, or hedge at least six feet in height. Gate openings which allow access to users and haulers shall be provided. Gate openings for haulers shall be a minimum of 10 feet wide and shall be capable of being secured in a closed and open position; Storage area(s) and containers shall be clearly labeled to indicate the type of materials accepted. No mixed solid waste collection or recyclables storage is needed for this use. Therefore, this standard is met. FINDING: Based on the analysis above, the Mixed Solid Waste & Recyclables Storage Standards have been met. Off-Street Parking and Loading (18.765): Location of vehicle parking: Off-street arking spaces for single-family and duplex dwellings and single-family attached dwellings shall be located on the same lot with the dwellings. Off-street parking lots for uses not listed above shall be located not further than 200 feet from the building or use that they are required to serve, measured in a straight line from the building with the following exceptions: a) commercial and industrial uses which require more than 40 parking spaces may provide for the spaces in excess of the required first 40 spaces up.to a distance of 300 feet from the primary site; The 40 parking spaces which remain on the primary site must be available for users in the following order of priority: 1) Disabled-accessible spaces; 2) Short-term spaces; 3) Long-term preferential carpool and vanpool spaces; 4) Long-term spaces. No parking is required for the proposed use. Therefore, this standard is met. Joint Parking: Owners of two or more uses, structures or parcels of land may agree to utilize jointly the same parking and loading spaces when the peak hours of operation do not overlay, subject to the following: 1) The size of the joint parking facility shall be at least as large as the number of vehicle parking spaces required by the larger(est) use per Section 18.765.070; 2) Satisfactory legal evidence shall be presented to the Director in the form of deeds, leases or contracts to establish the joint use; 3) If a joint use arrangement is subsequently terminated, or if the uses change, the requirements of this title thereafter apply to each separately. Joint parking is not proposed with this application. Therefore, this standard does not apply. Parking in Mixed-Use Projects: In mixed-use projects, the required minimum vehicle parking shall be determined using the following formula. 1) Primary use, i.e., that with the largest proportion of total floor area within the development, at 100% of the minimum vehicle parking required for that use in Section 18.765.060; 2) Secondary use, i.e., that with the second largest percentage of total floor area within the develo ment, at 90% of the vehicle parking required for that use in Section 18.765.060; 3 Subsequent use or uses, at 80% of the vehicle parking required for that use(s) in ection 18.765.060; 4) The maximum parking allowance shall be 150% of the total minimum parking as calculated in D.1.-3. above. The project is not considered a mixed-use project. Therefore, this standard does not apply. NOTICE OF TYPE II DECISION SDR2003-00018/T-MOBILE COMMUNICATIONS MONOPOLE PAGE 9 OF 21 Visitor Parking in Multi-Family Residential Developments: Multi-dwelling units with more than 10 required parking spaces shall provide an additional 15% of vehicle parking spaces above the minimum required for the use of guests of residents of the complex. These spaces shall be centrally located or distributed throughout the development. Required bicycle parking facilities shall also be centrally located within or evenly distributed throughout the development. This project does not involve a residential use. Therefore, this standard does not apply. Preferential Long-Term Carpool/Vanpool Parking: Parking lots providing in excess of 20 long-term parking spaces shall provide preferential long-term carpool and vanpool parking for employees, students and other regular visitors to the site. At least 5% of total long-term parking spaces shall be reserved for carpool/vanpool use. Preferential parking for carpools/vanpools shall be closer to the main entrances of the building than any other employee or student parking except parking spaces designated for use by the disabled. Preferential carpool/vanpool spaces shall be full-sized per requirements in Section 18.765.040N and shall be clearly designated for use only by carpools and vanpools between 7:00 AM and 5:30 PM Monday through Friday. No parking is required for the proposed use. Therefore, no carpool/vanpool stalls are required. Disabled-Accessible Parking: All parking areas shall be provided with the required number of parking spaces for disabled persons as specified by the State of Oregon Uniform Building Code and federal standards. Such parking spaces shall be sized, signed and marked-as required by these regulations. No parking is required for the proposed use. The facility is not intended for public access and is, therefore, exempt from ADA accessibility requirements. Therefore, this standard has been met. Access Drives: With regard to access to public streets from off-street parking: access drives from the street to off-street parking or loading areas shall be designed and constructed to facilitate the flow of traffic and provide maximum safety for pedestrian and vehicular traffic on the site; the number and size of access drives shall be in accordance with the requirements of Chapter, 18.705, Access, Egress and Circulation; access drives shall be clearly and permanently marked and defined through use of rails, fences, walls or other barriers or markers on frontage not occupied by service drives; access drives shall have a minimum vision clearance in accordance with Chapter 18.795, Visual Clearance; access drives shall be improved with an asphalt or concrete surface; and excluding single-family and duplex residences, except as provided by Subsection 18.810.030.P, groups of two or more parking spaces shall be served by a service drive so that no backing movements or other maneuvering within a street or other public right-of-way will be required. No changes to the primary access are proposed. Pedestrian Access: Pedestrian access through parking lots shall be provided in accordance with Section 18.705.030.F. Where a parking area or other vehicle area has a drop-off grade separation, the property owner shall install a wall, railing, or other barrier which will prevent a slow-moving vehicle or driverless vehicle from escaping such area and which will prevent pedestrians from walking over drop-off edges. There are no changes proposed to the parking and there are no pedestrian destinations that would necessitate pedestrian access from the parking lot. NOTICE OF TYPE II DECISION SDR2003-00018/T-MOBILE COMMUNICATIONS MONOPOLE PAGE 10 OF 21 Parking Lot Striping: Except for single-family and duplex residences, any area intended to be used to meet the off-street parking requirements as contained in this Chapter shall have all parking spaces clearly marked; and all interior drives and access aisles shall be clearly marked and signed to show direction of flow and maintain vehicular and pedestrian safety. There are no changes proposed to the parking area and no parking is required for the proposed use. Therefore, this standard has been met. Wheel Stops: Parking spaces along the boundaries of a parking lot or adjacent to interior landscaped areas or sidewalks shall be provided with a wheel stop at least four inches high located three feet back from the front of the parking stall. The front three feet of the parking stall may be concrete, asphalt or low lying landscape material that does not exceed the height of the wheel stop. This area cannot be calculated to meet landscaping or sidewalk requirements. There are no changes proposed to the parking area and no parking is required for the proposed use. Therefore, this standard has been met. Space and Aisle Dimensions: Section 18.765.040.N states that: "except as modified for angled parking in Figures 18.765.1 and 18.765.2 the minimum dimensions for parking spaces are: 8.5 feet x 18.5 feet for a standard space and 7.5 feet x 16.5 feet for a compact space; aisles accommodating two direction traffic, or allowing access from both ends, shall be 24 feet in width. There are no changes proposed to the parking area and no parking is required for the proposed use. Therefore, this standard has been met. Bicycle Parking Location and Access: Section 18.765.050 states bicycle parking areas shall be provided at locations within 50 feet of primary entrances to structures; bicycle parking areas shall not be located within parking aisles, landscape areas or pedestrian ways; outdoor bicycle parking shall be visible from on-site buildings and/or the street. Wien the bicycle parking area is not visible from the street, directional signs shall be used to locate the parking area; and bicycle parking may be located inside a building on a floor which has an outdoor entrance open for use and floor location which does not require the bicyclist to use stairs to gain access to the space. Exceptions may be made to the latter requirement for parking on upper stories within a multi-story residential building. There are no changes proposed to the parking area and no bicycle parking is required for the proposed use. Therefore, this standard has been met. Bicycle Parking Design Requirements: Section 18.765.050.C. The following design requirements apply to the installation of bicycle racks: The racks required for required bicycle parking spaces shall ensure that bicycles may be securely locked to them without undue inconvenience. Provision of bicycle lockers for long-term (employee) parking is encouraged but not required; bicycle racks must be securely anchored to the ground, wall or other structure; bicycle parking spaces shall be at least 21/2 feet by six feet long, and, when covered, with a vertical clearance of seven feet. An access aisle of at least five feet wide shall be provided and maintained beside or between each row of bicycle parking; each required bicycle parking space must be accessible without moving another bicycle; required bicycle parking spaces may not be rented or leased except where required motor vehicle parking is rented or leased. At-cost or deposit fees for bicycle parking are exempt from this requirement; and areas set aside for required bicycle parking must be clearly reserved for bicycle parking only. Outdoor bicycle parking facilities shall be surfaced with a hard surfaced material, i.e., pavers, asphalt, concrete or similar material. This surface must be designed to remain well drained. NOTICE OF TYPE II DECISION SDR2003-00018/T-MOBILE COMMUNICATIONS MONOPOLE PAGE 11 OF 21 There are no changes proposed to the parking area and no bicycle parking is required for the proposed use. Therefore, this standard has been met. Minimum Bicycle Parking Requirements: The total number of required bicycle parking spaces for each use is specified in Table 18.765.2 in Section 18.765.070.H. In no case shall there be less than two bicycle parking spaces. As discussed above, according to Table 18.765.2 of the Tigard Development Code, the minimum bicycle-parking requirement for a Wireless Communication Facility is zero spaces. Minimum Off-Street Parking: Section 18.765.070.H states that the minimum and maximum parking shall be as required in Table 18.765.2. Table 18.765.2 states that the minimum parking for a Wireless Communication Facility is zero spaces. Therefore, this standard is satisfied. Off-Street Loading Spaces: Commercial, industrial and institutional buildings or structures to be built or altered which receive and distribute material or merchandise by truck shall provide and maintain off-street loading and maneuvering space as follows: A minimum of one loading space is required for buildings with 10,000 gross square feet or more; A minimum of two loading spaces for buildings with 40,000 gross square feet or more. The proposed Wireless Communication Facility will not be within a building. The existing building on site is approximately 3,800 square feet. Therefore, this standard does not apply to the applicant's proposal. FINDING: Based on the above analysis, the off-street parking and loading standards have been met. Signs (18.780): Chapter 18.780.130.D lists the type of allowable signs and sign area permitted in the I-P Zoning District. The proposed plans do not call for any signage. Based on this, this standard is met. FINDING: This standard is met, since the applicant has not proposed any signs. Tree Removal (18.790): Section 18.790.030 requires that a tree plan for the planting, removal and protection of trees prepared by a certified arborist shall be rovided with a site development review application. The tree plan shall include identification of all existing trees, identification of a program to save existing trees or mitigate tree removal over 12 inches in caliper, which trees are to be removed, protection program defining standards and methods that will be used by the applicant to protect trees during and after construction. The applicant has submitted a site plan that shows no trees greater than 12 inches will be removed. The forester has noted that any work within 30 feet of the existing trees on site will require his additional review for appropriate protection measures. The only work that may come within 30 feet of the existing trees is trenching for the utility lines. The underground power route is proposed through the middle of the site, but it is unclear where the underground telco route will be. By following the forester's requirements for tree protection, this standard will be met. FINDING: By following the recommendations of the City Forester by maintaining a minimum of 30 feet distance between the existing trees and proposed construction activity, including trench excavation, the trees on site should not be impacted. NOTICE OF TYPE II DECISION SDR2003-00018/T-MOBILE COMMUNICATIONS MONOPOLE PAGE 12 OF 21 CONDITION: The applicant/owner shall submit a revised site plan that shows a minimum of 30 feet between the proposed utility trenches and any existing tree in excess of 12 inches diameter. This plan shall also indicate that "Should encroachments into this 30 foot zone be necessary, the applicant shall consult with and obtain the City Forester's approval prior to commencing work." Visual Clearance Areas (18.795): Chapter 18.795 requires that a clear vision area shall be maintained on the corners of all property adjacent to intersecting right-of-ways or the intersection of a public street and a private driveway. A clear vision area shall-contain no vehicle, hedge pplanting, fence, wall structure, or temporary or permanent obstruction exceeding three (3) feet in height. The code provides that obstructions that may be located in this area shall be visually clear between three (3) and eight (8) feet in height (8) (trees may be placed within this area provided that all branches below eight (8) feet are removed). A visual clearance area is the triangular area formed by measuring a 30-foot distance along the street right- of-way and the driveway, and then connecting these two (2), 30-foot distance points with a straight line. The primary access to this property is from SW Pacific Highway. The vision clearance areas are shown on the applicant's site plan. A sight distance certification was submitted to confirm that there are no visual obstacles at the site's access entry. FINDING: The Visual Clearance Standards have been met. Wireless Communication Facilities (18.798): Chapter 18.798 allows wireless communication facilities in commercial zones, the I-P zone and public rights of way, subject to a Site Development Review process, provided they satisfy the specific criteria outlined in this chapter and are setback from any offsite residence a distance equal to the height of the tower. Aesthetic: New towers shall maintain a non-reflective gray finish or, if required by the FAA, be painted pursuant to the FAA's requirements; if collocation on an existing is requested, the design of any antenna(s), accessory structures or equipment shall, to the extent possible, use materials, colors and textures that will match the existing tower or non-tower structure to which the equipment of the collocating provider is being attached; if collocation on an existing non-tower structure is requested, the antenna(s) and supporting electrical and mechanical equipment shall be a neutral color that is the same as the color as the supporting structure so as to make the antenna(s) and related equipment as visually unobtrusive as possible. The proposed facility is not a collocation. The applicant has indicated that the tower will have a non reflective gray finish, however, alternate marking may be imposed by the FAA. Antennae will be concealed within the pole structure to be as visually unobtrusive as possible. Setbacks: Towers designed to collapse within themselves shall be set back in accordance with the setbacks contained in the base zone; towers not designed to collapse within themselves shall be set back from the property line by a distance equal to the height of the tower. The applicant has provided an engineer's analysis detailing the failure characteristics of the proposed tower. Staff concludes that since the tower is designed to "fold" in the middle, the relative fall zone is zero feet outside the facility compound. As described previously in this decision, the tower meets the underlying zone setbacks and is moreover 101 feet from the closest off-site structure. Tower spacing: No new tower shall be allowed within 500 feet of an existing tower. The nearest existing tower is approximately 2,500 feet to the north. The proposed communications tower (Case File CUP2003-00010) is approximately 2,200 feet to the south. Tower height: No tower shall exceed 100 feet for a single user or 125 feet for multiple users; NOTICE OF TYPE II DECISION SDR2003-000181T-MOBILE COMMUNICATIONS MONOPOLE PAGE 13 OF 21 The proposed tower is for a single user, and will be 100 feet, including the self contained antenna canisters. Lighting: No lighting shall be permitted on a tower except as required by the FAA; No lighting has been proposed on the tower. Final lighting determination will be made by the FAA. Fencing and security: For security purposes, towers and ancillary facilities shall be enclosed by a minimum six-foot fence; The proposed facility will be enclosed by a six-foot-tall cedar fence, the equipment will be self contained and not housed in a separate structure. Landscaping and screening: Landscaping shall be placed outside the fence and shall consist of evergreen shrubs which reach six feet in height and 95% opacity within three years of planting; when adjacent to or within residentially-zoned property, free- standing towers and accessory equipment facilities shall be screened by the planting of a minimum of four evergreen trees at least 15 feet in height at the time of planting. The proposed tower is not within a residential zone, but is adjacent to one. The applicant has proposed a landscaping scheme that utilizes rhododendrons to form a continuous evergreen hedge around the perimeter of the compound along with four vine maples and groundcover. The plan is deficient in terms of the requirement for four evergreen trees at least 15 feet in height at time of planting. These trees could be used to satisfy or partially satisfy the previously imposed condition related to buffering and screening, discussed above. Noise: Noise-generating equipment shall be sound-buffered by means of baffling, barriers or other suitable means to reduce the sound level measured at the property line to 50 dBA (day)/40 dBA (night) when adjacent to a noise-sensitive land use and 75 dBA (day)/60 dA (night) when adjacent to other uses. As discussed and conditioned previously, there is inadequate information available in the application to determine whether this standard will be met. By satisfying the previous condition, this standard will be met. FINDING: Based on the analysis above, the landscape plan is inadequate to meet the additional requirements for wireless communications facility sites adjacent to residential zones. Also, staff cannot determine based on the information provided, whether the specific requirements for noise buffering have been satisfied. However, with the imposition of the following conditions, these standards can be met. CONDITIONS: • The applicant shall revise the landscape plan to include at a minimum an additional four evergreen trees, 15 feet in height at time of planting. These trees may be used as part of the screening of residential properties to the south as previously conditioned. • The applicant shall provide documentation regarding the noise levels in decibel ratings for the proposed air conditioning units that shows the levels to be below 50 dBA (day)/40 dBA(night) measured at the property line. C. SPECIFIC SITE DEVELOPMENT REVIEW APPROVAL STANDARDS Section 18.360.090(A)(2) through 18.360.090(A)(15) provides additional Site Development Review approval standards not necessarily covered by the provisions of the previously listed sections. These additional standards are addressed immediately below with the following exceptions: NOTICE OF TYPE H DECISION SDR2003-00018/T-MOBILE COMMUNICATIONS MONOPOLE PAGE 14 OF 21 The proposal contains no elements related to the provisions of the following and are, therefore, found to be inapplicable as approval standards: 18.360.090.3 (Exterior Elevations); 18.360.090.5 (Privacy and Noise: Multi-family or Group Living Uses); 18.360.090.6 (Private Outdoor Areas: Multi-family Use); 18.360.090.7 (Shared Outdoor Recreation Areas: Multi-family Use); 18.360.090.8 (100-year floodplain); and 18.360.090.9 (Demarcation of Spaces). The following sections were discussed previously in this decision and, therefore, will not be addressed in this section: 18.360.090.4 (Buffering, Screening and Compatibility Between Adjoining Uses); 18.360.090.13 Parking); 18.360.090.14 (Landscaping); 18.360.090.15 (Drainage); and 18.360.090.14 (Provisions for the Disabled). Relationship to the Natural and Physical Environment: Buildings shall be: located to preserve existing trees, topography and natural drainage where possible based upon existing site conditions; located in areas not subject to ground slumping or sliding; located to provide adequate distance between adjoining buildings for adequate light, air circulation, and fire-fighting; and oriented with consideration for sun and wind. Trees shall be preserved to the extent possible. Replacement of trees is subject to the requirements of Chapter 18.790, Tree Removal. The proposed wireless communication facility site is located in a small landscape island surrounded by parking and building. No tree removal or drainage alteration is required to accommodate the proposed development and only a minimal amount of grading will be needed. Suitable separation is provided between the proposed equipment fenced enclosure and the buildings on or off site, which is adequate for light and air circulation. Crime Prevention and Safety: • Windows shall be located so that areas vulnerable to crime can be surveyed by the occupants; • Interior laundry and service areas shall be located in a way that they can be observed by others; • Mail boxes shall be located in lighted areas having vehicular or pedestrian traffic; • The exterior lighting levels shall be selected and the angles shall be oriented towards areas vulnerable to crime; and • Light fixtures shall be provided in areas having heavy pedestrian or vehicular traffic and in potentially dangerous areas such as parking lots, stairs, ramps and abrupt grade changes. Fixtures shall be placed at a height so that light patterns overlap at a height of seven feet, which is sufficient to illuminate a person. The un-staffed status of the site necessitates added security. Fencing is proposed to surround the monopole and radio cabinets. One of the neighbors commented during the neighborhood meeting that there was inadequate lighting at the rear of the building. FINDING: Staff concurs that security lighting would benefit this area, but notes that it may cause unwanted glare on neighboring properties. CONDITION: The applicant shall ensure that a security light or motion detector light is installed to illuminate the rear of the property. This light shall be shielded to prevent light trespass onto adjacent properties. Public Transit: Provisions within the plan shall be included to provide for transit if the development proposal is adjacent to existing or proposed transit route; the requirements for transit facilities shall be based on: the location of other transit facilities in the area; and the size and type of the proposal. The following facilities may be required after City and Tri-Met review: bus stop shelters; turnouts for buses; and connecting paths to the shelters. NOTICE OF TYPE II DECISION SDR2003-00018/T-MOBILE COMMUNICATIONS MONOPOLE PAGE 15 OF 21 The site has frontage on SW Pacific Highway. While SW Pacific Highway has a bus route, the proposed development is un-staffed and, therefore, does not generate potential ridership. Therefore, this standard does not apply. Provisions of the Underlying Zone: All of the provisions and regulations of the underlying zone shall apply unless modified by other sections or this title, e.g., Planned Developments, Chapter 18.350; or a variance or adjustment granted under Chapter 18.370. Dimensional Requirements: Provisions of the (C-G) General Commercial Zoning District have been addressed earlier in this decision under Section 18.520.040.B. FINDING: Based on the analysis above and the imposition of the conditions, the specific standards of the Site Development Review Section can be met. D. Street And Utility Improvements Standards (Section 18.810): Chapter 18.810 provides construction standards for the implementation of public and private facilities and utilities such as streets, sewers, and drainage. The applicable standards are addressed below: Streets: Improvements: Section 18.810.030.A.1 states that streets within a development and streets adjacent shall be improved in accordance with the TDC standards. Section 18.810.030.A.2 states that any new street or additional street width planned as a portion of an existing street shall be dedicated and improved in accordance with the TDC. This site lies adjacent to SW Pacific Highway, which is classified as a 5-lane Arterial in the City of Tigard Transportation System Plan. The street is presently improved to 5 lanes with bike lanes, curbs, gutters and sidewalks, but lacks adequate sidewalk width and planter strips. At present, there is approximately 84 feet of total right-of-way (ROW), or 42 feet from centerline according to the most recent tax assessor's map. The present standards for 5 lane arterial streets is 104 feet of total right-of-way (52 feet from centerline). Therefore, the applicant is required to dedicate 10 feet of right of way along the site frontage, to achieve the 52 foot from centerline requirement. Based on the impacts generated from the proposed use, it is not proportionate to require this dedication. Refer to the impact analysis later in this decision. Sidewalks: Section 18.810.070.A requires that sidewalks be constructed to meet City design standards and be located on both sides of arterial, collector and local residential streets. There are existing 5-foot-wide sidewalks along the site's frontage. Sanitary Sewers: Sewers Required: Section 18.810.090.A requires that sanitary sewer be installed to serve each new development and to connect developments to existing mains in accordance with the provisions set forth in Design and Construction Standards for Sanitary and Surface Water Management (as adopted by Clean Water Services in 1996 and including any future revisions or amendments) and the adopted policies of the comprehensive plan. Over-sizing: Section 18.810.090.0 states that proposed sewer systems shall include consideration of additional development within the area as projected by the Comprehensive Plan. NOTICE OF TYPE II DECISION SDR2003-000181T-MOBILE COMMUNICATIONS MONOPOLE PAGE 16 OF 21 There is an existing 8-inch public sewer main located in SW Pacific Highway. The existing structure is already served by this main line. The proposed use does not require sewer service, so no additional public sewer line work is necessary for this development. Storm Drainage: General Provisions: Section 18.810.100.A states requires developers to make adequate provisions for storm water and flood water runoff. Accommodation of Upstream Drainage: Section 18.810.100.0 states that a culvert or other drainage facility shall be large enough to accommodate potential runoff from its entire upstream drainage area, whether inside or outside the development. The City Engineer shall approve the necessary size of the facility, based on the provisions of Design and Construction Standards for Sanitary and Surface Water Management (as adopted by Clean Water Services in 2000 and including any future revisions or amendments). The topography of this is very flat and is served by an internal system of surface drains. These drains discharge into the storm system in SW Pacific Highway. The applicant's onsite storm drainage plan will collect any surface water that would impact this site and convey it to the public system in SW Pacific Highway. Effect on Downstream Drainage: Section 18.810.100.D states that where it is anticipated by the City Engineer that the additional runoff resulting from the development will overload an existing drainage facility, the Director and Engineer shall withhold approval of the development until provisions have been made for improvement of the potential condition or until provisions have been made for storage of additional runoff caused by the development in accordance with the Design and Construction Standards for Sanitary and Surface Water Management (as adopted by Clean Water Services in 2000 and including any future revisions or amendments). CWS design standards provide that if the impervious area of a site is not increased over 5,000 square feet, then onsite detention is not required. The proposed wireless facility compound will include a small (134 s.f.) expansion to the paved area, and the 315 s.f. fenced enclosure will be hard surfaced. This results in a net increase in impervious area of 489 s.f. Therefore, on-site detention is not required for this project. Bikeways and Pedestrian Pathways: Bikeway Extension: Section 18.810.110.A states that developments adjoining proposed bikeways identified on the City's adopted pedestrian/bikeway plan shall include provisions for the future extension of such bikeways through the dedication of easements or right-of-way. Bike lanes are already existing along the site frontage. No bikeways are associated with this project. Therefore, this criterion does not apply. Cost of Construction: Section 18.810.110.B states that development permits issued for planned unit developments, conditional use permits, subdivisions, and other developments which will principally benefit from such bikeways shall be conditioned to include the cost or construction of bikeway improvements. No bikeways are associated with this project. Therefore, this criterion does not apply. Minimum Width: Section 18.810.110.0 states that the minimum width for bikeways within the roadway is five feet per bicycle travel lane. Minimum width for two-way bikeways separated from the road is eight feet. No bikeways are associated with this project. Therefore, this criterion does not apply. NOTICE OF TYPE II DECISION SDR2003-00018/T-MOBILE COMMUNICATIONS MONOPOLE PAGE 17 OF 21 Utilities: Section 18.810.120 states that all utility lines, but not limited to those required for electric, communication, lighting and cable television services and related facilities shall be placed underground, except for surface mounted transformers, surface mounted connection boxes and meter cabinets which may be placed above ground, temporary utility service facilities during construction, high capacity electric lines operating at 50,000 volts or above, and: • The developer shall make all necessary arrangements with the serving utility to • Tprovide the underground services; he City reserves the right to approve location of all surface mounted facilities; • All underground utilities, including sanitary sewers and storm drains installed in streets by the developer, shall be constructed prior to the surfacing of the streets. and • Stubs for service connections shall be long enough to avoid disturbing the street improvements when service connections are made. Exception to Under-Grounding Requirement: Section 18.810.120.0 states that a developer shall pay a fee in-lieu of under-grounding costs when the development is proposed to take place on a street where existing utilities which are not underground will serve the development and the approval authority determines that the cost and technical difficulty of under-grounding the utilities outweighs the benefit of under- grounding in conjunction with the development. The determination shall be on a case- by-case basis. The most common, but not the only, such situation is a short frontage development for which under-grounding would result in the placement of additional poles, rather than the removal of above-ground utilities facilities. An applicant for a development which is served by utilities which are not underground and which are located across a public right-of-way from the applicant's property shall pay a fee in-lieu of under-grounding. There are existing overhead utility lines along both sides of SW Pacific Highway. According to the Engineering Department, the lines that front this site are high power lines, and are therefore exempt from this undergrounding requirement. All service utilities to the development shall be installed underground however. ADDITIONAL CITY AND/OR AGENCY CONCERNS WITH STREET AND UTILITY IMPROVEMENT STANDARDS: Public Water System: This site is located in the Tigard Water District service area. No requirements for additional water service are needed. Storm Water Quality: The City has agreed to enforce Surface Water Management (SWM) regulations established by Clean Water Services (CWS) Design and Construction Standards (adopted by Resolution and Order No. 00-7) which require the construction of on-site water quality facilities. The facilities shall be designed to remove 65 percent of the phosphorus contained in 100 percent of the storm water runoff generated from newly created impervious surfaces. In addition, a maintenance plan shall be submitted indicating the frequency and method to be used in keeping the facility maintained through the year. As less than 1,000 square feet of net new impervious areas is being created, no additional compliance measures are required. Grading and Erosion Control: CWS design and Construction Standards also regulate erosion control to reduce the amount of sediment and other pollutants reaching the public storm and surface water system resulting from development, construction, grading, excavating, clearing, and any other activity which accelerates erosion. Per CWS regulations, the applicant is required to submit an erosion control plan for City review and approval prior to issuance of City permits. NOTICE OF TYPE II DECISION SDR2003-00018/T-MOBILE COMMUNICATIONS MONOPOLE PAGE 18 OF 21 The Federal Clean Water Act requires that a National Pollutant Discharge Elimination System (NPDES) erosion control permit be issued for any development that will disturb five or more acres of land. While the subject property is greater than 5 acres, the area of disturbance is limited to approximately 1200 square feet. Since this disturbed area is less than five acres, the developer will not be required to obtain an NPDES permit from the City prior to construction. This permit will be issued along with the site and/or building permit. A grading and erosion control plan must be submitted to the Building Division during the site permit review phase. The Building Division will review the onsite grading plan during the site permit review. A NPDES permit is not required, as the disturbance area is less than five acres in size. FINDING: Based on the above analysis, the Agency Concerns have been addressed by the application materials. Address Assignments: The City of Tigard is responsible for assigning addresses for parcels within the City of Tigard and within the Urban Service Boundary USB). An addressing fee in the amount of $30.00 per address shall be assessed. This fee shall be paid to the City prior to issuance of a site permit. For this project, there is no additional addressing fee, as the existing address will be maintained. E. IMPACT STUDY (18.390) Section 18.360.090 states, "The Director shall make a finding with respect to each of the following criteria when approving, approving with conditions or denying an application:' Section 18.390.040 states that the applicant shall provide an impact study to quantify the effect of development on public facilities and services. For each public facility system and type of impact, the study shall propose improvements necessary to meet City standard, and to minimize the impact of the development on the public at large, public facilities systems, and affected private property users. In situations where the Community Development Code requires the dedication of real property interests, the applicant shall either specifically concur with a requirement for public right-of-way dedication, or provide evidence that supports that the real property dedication is not roughly proportional to the projected impacts of the development. Section 18.390.040 states that when a condition of approval requires the transfer to the public of an interest in real property, the approval authority shall adopt findings which support the conclusion that the interest in real property to be transferred is roughly proportional to the impact the proposed development will have on the public. The applicant has provided an impact study addressing the project's impacts on public systems. The study notes that there will be no impact to the transportation system as the facility will only generate one round trip per month. Bikeways will likewise not be affected. The drainage system will not be adversely impacted either. As the area to be developed is very small (489 s.f.), there is no requirement to detain or treat the stormwater runoff from the subject site. Parks, water and sewer systems will not be impacted as the proposed monopole is un-staffed and does not require sewer or water hookups. Earlier in this report, the issue about noise from the air conditioning units was raised, and a condition imposed that the applicant provides documentation regarding compliance with the noise limits. The Washington County Traffic Impact Fee (TIF) is a mitigation measure that is required at the time of development. Based on a transportation impact study prepared by Mr. David Larson for the A-Boy Expansion/Dolan II/Resolution 95-61, TIF's are expected to recapture 32 percent of the traffic impact of new development on the Collector and Arterial Street system. Based on the estimate that total TIF fees cover 32 percent of the impact on major street NOTICE OF TYPE II DECISION SDR2003-00018/T-MOBILE COMMUNICATIONS MONOPOLE PAGE 19 OF 21 improvements citywide, a fee that would cover 100 percent of this projects traffic impact is the TIF divided by 0.32. The difference between the TIF paid, and the full impact, is considered the unmitigated impact on the street system. The County's TIF Schedule does not include a TIF for wireless communications facilities as it generates a limited amount of traffic. Based on this, the TIF would be $0. A fee that would cover 100% of the unmitigated impact would be $0 (0 T 0.32). The unmitigated impact of this project on the transportation system is therefore, $0. For purposes of evaluating the proportionality of the required exactions, the city uses an estimated value. The final value of these exactions may differ based on a fair market appraisal. The following lists the off-site exactions that are being imposed on the applicant and their estimated value: Right-of-way dedications to SW Pacific Highway 1,090 s.f. @ $15.00 s.f. $ 16,350 As the value of the proposed improvements is substantially greater than the unmitigated impact, it is not proportionate to exact these improvements. There is no TIF assessment for this use FINDING: While the proposal has not proposed dedicating sufficient right-of-way to meet city requirements of the Transportation System Plan (TSP) for ultimate planned roadway width, the proposed development has no significant impact on the transportation system. Therefore, it is not proportionate to require right of way dedication. SECTION VII. OTHER STAFF COMMENTS The City of Tigard Forester has reviewed the proposal and noted that no trees will be impacted by the proposed improvements should the construction maintain 30 feet of clearance from the base of the existing trees. The City of Tigard Engineering Manager and the City of Tigard Crime Prevention Office of the Police Department have reviewed the proposal and has no objections to it. Public Works Department has reviewed the proposal and have no objections to it. The City of Tigard Building Division notes that Site, Building, and Electrical Permits are required SECTION VIII. AGENCY COMMENTS Washington County Communications (WCCCA) has reviewed the proposal and has no objections to it. SECTION IX. PROCEDURE AND APPEAL INFORMATION Notice: Notice was posted at City Hall and mailed to: X The applicant and owners X Owner of record within the required distance X Affected government agencies Final Decision: THIS DECISION IS FINAL ON FEBRUARY 25, 2004 AND BECOMES EFFECTIVE ON MARCH 11, 2004 UNLESS AN APPEAL IS FILED. NOTICE OF TYPE II DECISION SDR2003-00018/T-MOBILE COMMUNICATIONS MONOPOLE PAGE 20 OF 21 Appeal: The decision of the Director (Type II Procedure) or Review Authority (Type II Administrative Appeal or Type III Procedure) is final for purposes of appeal on the date that it is mailed. Any party with standing as provided in Section 18.390.040.G.1. may appeal this decision in accordance with Section 18.390.040.G.2. of the Tigard Community Development Code which provides that a written appeal together with the required fee shall be filed with the Director within ten (10) business days of the date the notice of the decision was mailed. The appeal fee schedule and forms are available from the Planning Division of Tigard City Hall, 13125 SW Hall Boulevard, Tigard, Oregon 97223. Unless the applicant is the appellant, the hearing on an appeal from the Director's Decision shall be confined to the specific issues identified in the written comments submitted by the parties during the comment period. Additional evidence concerning issues properly raised in the Notice of Appeal may be submitted by any party during the appeal hearing, subject to any additional rules of procedure that may be adopted from time to time by the appellate body. THE DEADLINE FOR FILING AN APPEAL IS AT 5:00 PM ON MARCH 10, 2004. Questions: If you have any questions, please call the City of Tigard Planning Division, Tigard City Hall, 13125 SW Hall Boulevard, Tigard, Oregon at (503) 639-4171. _ February 25, 2004 PREPAR D BY: Morg n Tracy DATE Associate Planner Aribb' Februa 25, 2004 A P'R• ED': : Richard H. Bew: •orff DATE Planning Manat -' is\curpin\morgan\workspace\sdr\sdr2003-00018(t-mobile masonic lodge)\sdr2003-00018 decision.doc NOTICE OF TYPE II DECISION SDR2003-00018/T-MOBILE COMMUNICATIONS MONOPOLE PAGE 21 OF 21 r_ __, _ _ 1 ! I I i -� ,/ / ,, ,-- CITY of TIGARD MIRAl ,iii r GEOGRAPHIC INFORMATION SYSTEM T _ COOK LN , `�M� ' ' \. vr\ VICINITY MAP Q/ V' i � — i Q 1 SDR2003-00018 1 <\ -, I _i , ,. i FAIRHAVEN ST / T-MOBILE WIRELESS 11i/ ab MONOPOLE TOWER FAIRHAVEN / �� __ _.\ I _-- — / ` A--ORS F R ' ' I EN PARK PL j _- - � ` `, Y / HILL VIEW ST ' - IL . n EF�/ rA Q z Z / f G - TgarG Area Map •----------- I 1 z CAll 911 FE ....> N v as. m . _____ , 0 100 200 300 400 Fed r_ _ _ 1_ :ell Q. ►. I— 1 310 fed 1 4 ___ i . City of Tigard • Information on this map is for general location only and I�A I - should be verified with the Development Services Division. 13125 SW Hall Blvd i ,. Tigard.OR 97223 I • / (503)639 4171 / / hnpfnvww.a.t gandaus Community Development Plot date:Feb 10,2004;C:\magic\MAGIC03.APR II ,�ryY��yp$./_ - "1O®r�e.xu i"m MI ILL i moo TTi101100 Mk 1K Plow lo Do km-o[m 1K 48A• T1.11 NB Alluv(Q i48T•M(l IMFIONA CAMIOIL 8081 .AA flm[� MOW•IMAIKs wow gOC[MIWW`l NY1pY n•nms me 81.011 R o•ali nom•R n a•m [•Holt-al 94E a-al1CC9v • 184 84A[[ 'GO3 o..M.148 II®p4- 1 / 'i r 3;r C �f` / r 'r' ��,. '�I;;•:�1,-o� .rs>�?a}�� 1�� yJl�/��' A��t�:s �::�:�i �; !a .�1':4tifjiS.�fj1'Ay1�4�m�R.... 2--,-. .,1121!ir / I� ex;::§fis II �L .j. L c os ulr. 11 i i1111,1Ii��` II I :3 Lf`` IIUl�ill'I! 1• 1; ::::.::LT �•. ,,,11,111111% �� IIII .w it.'''.um imnouuro 0�L�;:�:::::;. 111 !' ii •••1111 1, n L�'llll I!illgl'I!'DIIIR�j 1l1111/MI @I'"a••�L•••L••:L•.'•L•• 1111, 1116,111 WEST ELEVATION slum smr-1.-a 12 SOUTH ELEVATION sum a/(r-r� I 1 C RY O1 iTIGARD CITY OF TIGARD 1 SDR2003-00018 SITE PLAN N T-MOBILE WIRELESS MONOPOLE TOWER (Map is not to scale) / - 4, DESCRIPTIONS PARENT PARCEL REFERENCE NV4BER 871:m0529 OF THE D®RECORDS OF 0091P1GTON COUNTS. 7bi4 LEASE PREMISES R1iNIC AT THE SOUNDEST CORNER Of A COYYUNICA1gNS LEASE SITE TROY W901 THE ylY1T nu�y 18'1 WORTHIEST CORNER OP LOT 10.FRETEON HEIGHTS-RAT 2 AS PLATTED AM)RECORDED IN .;J Y� 9O1LE IL PAGE 26 OF ME RAT RECORDS OF 0091N0TON WIMTT,OREGON BEARS SO TH • Nisir N718'55-EAST 114.77 FEET:THENCE NORM 50'33'58'WEST 1600 FEET;1NEGLE NORM G 3S21'Oy EAST 25.33 FEET:THENCE SOUTH 5013'50'EAST 10.00 FEET: THENCE SOUTH •G 30200 T11G.T 25.33 FEET TO THE PONT OF FEET YORE OA NESS.BEG9/N9/C A/EI 7FRNw/Al1NG DE5[REED PARLEE• • Q' t5-'P 0T ACCESS AND UTDRT PJSEN ENT DESCRIPTION: i 11EOMIf AT A PONT CN RE EASTERLY RIGHT-OF-WAY UNE OF PACNIC HIGHWAY(US NCIIWAY y `\ 09 POOR WEN 1K MORONIC-ST CORNER OF LOT R0.FRELECN HOGH15-RAT 2 AS RATTED 2 1 ANO REf:ORDED W yDLUME 0.PAfE 26 pF 7K PUT AECO DS OF WA51W1G10N Cd1Ntt.p11EOON OURS 5011TH St1)5'19'EAST 324.73 FEET:THENCE 50UM 50'31'09'EAST 197,19 FEET.OREGON KONG 11E ARC d<A 39.07 FOOT RADIUS CURVE,111E CHdtp Of 919CT1 BEARS SOUTH 53'T93T/ IT _ ._ ' EAST,Aa.70 FEET: R1F7R.E NORM 39R9'OY EAST 10.75 MEET: THENCE NORM 50'33'58' R[ST / 21.27 FEETTO M EAST BOUNDARY OF T1E ABOVE DESCRIBED CLOIAO RCATgNS LEASE AREA ANp / THERE TERMINATING.SAG PONT OF TERMINUS IS le...// / ■0\.\ SOUTHIIEST CORNER OF SAD COMMUNICATORS ESE 39 6'01'EAST 1250 FEET FIRMA THE / TNONS LEASE SHE t• . / / / •� / BALDING HOOP / EL 205.091 MOM P91.4"Mot ..411v.... ,-.... �- ® o 'N o • fit.1 N Y �� • ,0. ,� rd • � s 41F i .\`, rN�\ \` �WC • ...,_...,ja N MIL.°-- , —�'`� :I.. �7N' = y �y7 • • • �\ \f N t �� ■ 19 O • • • irons-E WERT ■ P.yr.w A • � • • $• ♦ • .0 o e _ 'i.-..3 i ii. k CITY OF TIGARD T SDR2003-00018 Cm OF TIGARD SITE PLAN N T-MOBILE WIRELESS MONOPOLE TOWER (Map is not to scale) T-Mobile Wireless EXHIBIT Attn: Jim Barta SDR2003-00018 1500 NE Irving Street, Suite 530 T-MOBILE WIRELESS MONOPOLE TOWER Portland, OR 97232 Tigard Lodge No. 207 of AF & AM Attn: John Havery, Secretary "NOTICE OF DIRECTOR'S DECISION" PO Box 230184 Tigard, OR 97281 AFFIDAVIT OF MAILING CITTYYOOF TIGARD Community(Development SfrapingA Better Community I, Patricia L. Lunsford, being first duly sworn/affirm, on oath depose and say that I am a Senior Administrative Specialist for the City of Tigard, Washington County, Oregon and that I served the following: (Check Appropriate Box(s)Below} E2 NOTICE OF PENDING LAND USE APPLICATION FOR: SDR2003-00018/T-MOBILE WIRELESS MONOPOLE TOWER ri AMENDED NOTICE (File No./Name Reference) 7] City of Tigard Planning Director A copy of the said notice being hereto attached, marked Exhibit"A",and by reference made a part hereof, was mailed to each named person(s) at the address(s) shown on the attached list(s), marked Exhibit"B", and by reference made a part hereof, on February 10,2004, and deposited in the United States Mail on February 10,2004, postage prepaid. / 7,. I ilk, (Perso t - Prepared No ice) , STATE OE 0441ggON ) County of Washington )Egan( / Subscribed and sworn/affir-fned before me on the 2— day of Ft7--c---6(44 , 2004. .. OFFICIAL SEAL G J BENGTSON O ,; NOTARY PUBLIGOREGON () COMMISSION NO.368086 MY COMMISSION EXPIRES APR.27,2007 NOTAR PUBLOc PUBLIC OREGON / My Commission Expires: ¼ 7/° 7 EXHIBIT. A NOTICE TO MORTGAGEE, LIENHOLDER,VENDOR OR SELLER: THE TIGARD DEVELOPMENT CODE REQUIRES THAT IF YOU RECEIVE THIS NOTICE,IT SHALL BE PROMPTLY FORWARDED TO THE PURCHASER. NOTICE OF PENDING LAND USE APPLICATION SITE DEVELOPMENT REVIEW CITY OF TIGARD Community(Development Shaping A Better Community DATE OF NOTICE: February 10, 2004 FILE NUMBER: SITE DEVELOPMENT REVIEW (SDR) 2003-00018 Type II Land Use Application FILE NAME: T-MOBILE WIRELESS MONOPOLE TOWER PROPOSAL: The applicant is requesting Site Development Review approval to construct a new wireless communications facility consisting of a 100-foot monopole tower and BTS radio transmitting equipment cabinets mounted on the ground adjacent to the monopole. The proposed lease area will be placed within a fenced enclosure. ZONE: C-G: General Commercial District. The C-G zoning district is designed to accommodate a full range of retail, office and civic uses with a city-wide and even regional trade area. Except where non-conforming, residential uses are limited to single-family residences which are located on the same site as a permitted use. A wide range of uses, including but not limited to adult entertainment, automotive equipment repair and storage, mini-warehouses, utilities, heliports, medical centers, major event entertainment, and gasoline stations, are permitted conditionally. APPLICABLE REVIEW CRITERIA: Community Development Code Chapters 18.370, 18.390, 18.520, 18.705, 18.730, 18.745, 18.765, 18.790, 18.795, 18.798 and 18.810. LOCATION: 13680 SW Pacific Highway; WCTM 2S102CC, Tax Lot 1100. YOUR RIGHT TO PROVIDE WRITTEN COMMENTS: Prior to the City making any decision on the Application, you are hereby provided a fourteen (14) day period to submit written comments on the application to the City. THE FOURTEEN (14) DAY PERIOD ENDS AT 5:00 PM ON FEBRUARY 24, 2004. All comments should be directed to Morgan Tracy, Associate Planner in the Planning Division at the City of Tigard, 13125 SW Hall Boulevard, Tigard, Oregon 97223. You may reach the City of Tigard by telephone at (503) 639-4171 or by e-mail to morctan(c�ci.tigard.or.us. ALL COMMENTS MUST BE RECEIVED BY THE CITY OF TIGARD IN WRITING PRIOR TO 5:00 PM ON THE DATE SPECIFIED ABOVE IN ORDER FOR YOUR COMMENTS TO BE CONSIDERED IN THE DECISION MAKING PROCESS THE CITY OF TIGARD APPRECIATES RECEIVING COMMENTS AND VALUES YOUR INPUT. COMMENTS WILL BE CONSIDERED AND ADDRESSED WITHIN THE NOTICE OF DECISION. A DECISION ON THIS ISSUE IS TENTATIVELY SCHEDULED FOR MARCH 22, 2004. IF YOU PROVIDE COMMENTS, YOU WILL BE SENT A COPY OF THE FULL DECISION ONCE IT HAS BEEN RENDERED. WRITTEN COMMENTS WILL BECOME A PART OF THE PERMANENT PUBLIC RECORD AND SHALL CONTAIN THE FOLLOWING INFORMATION: • Address the specific "Applicable Review Criteria" described in the section above or any other criteria believed to be applicable to this proposal; • Raise any issues and/or concerns believed to be important with sufficient evidence to allow the City to provide a response; • Comments that provide the basis for an appeal to the Tigard Hearings Officer must address the relevant approval criteria with sufficient specificity on that issue. Failure of any party to address the relevant approval criteria with sufficient specificity may preclude subsequent appeals to the Land Use Board of Appeals or Circuit Court on that issue. Specific findings directed at the relevant approval criteria are what constitute relevant evidence. AFTER THE 14 DAY COMMENT PERIOD CLOSES, THE DIRECTOR SHALL ISSUE A TYPE II ADMINISTRATIVE DECISION. THE DIRECTOR'S DECISION SHALL BE MAILED TO THE APPLICANT AND TO OWNERS OF RECORD OF PROPERTY LOCATED WITHIN 500 FEET OF THE SUBJECT SITE, AND TO ANYONE ELSE WHO SUBMITTED WRITTEN COMMENTS OR WHO IS OTHERWISE ENTITLED TO NOTICE. THE DIRECTOR'S DECISION SHALL ADDRESS ALL OF THE RELEVANT APPROVAL CRITERIA. BASED UPON THE CRITERIA AND THE FACTS CONTAINED WITHIN THE RECORD, THE DIRECTOR SHALL APPROVE, APPROVE WITH CONDITIONS OR DENY THE REQUESTED PERMIT OR ACTION. SUMMARY OF THE DECISION-MAKING PROCESS: . The application is accepted by the City . Notice is sent to property owners of record within 500 feet of the proposed development area allowing a 14-day written comment period. . The application is reviewed by City Staff and affected agencies. . City Staff issues a written decision. . Notice of the decision is sent to the Applicant and all owners or contract purchasers of record of the site; all owners of record of property located within 500 feet of the site, as shown on the most recent property tax assessment roll; any City-recognized neighborhood group whose boundaries include the site; and any governmental agency which is entitled to notice under an intergovernmental agreement entered into with the City which includes provision for such notice or anyone who is otherwise entitled to such notice. INFORMATION/EVIDENCE AVAILABLE FOR REVIEW: The application, written comments and supporting documents relied upon by the Director to make this decision are contained within the record and are available for public review at the City of Tigard Community Development Department. Copies of these items may be obtained at a cost of $.25 per page or the current rate charged for this service. Questions regarding this application should be directed to the Planning Staff indicated on the first page of this Notice under the section titled "Your Right to Provide Written Comments." .aw / tv;ITIC ARO _ I I1 j'4 � }� VIQNITY MAP _ fcl bhT_ a4f -: {' I I 1 — I -- -- --,, _ < / 4 I _ 1 SDR2003-00018 - ifs:� ' 1 '•:S -.T-MOBILE WIRELESS :IN 1 TT ► J MONOPOLE TOWER T �' r , , , � 1 i i Ill �� ,� ic"'. , " ' - -- VIEW ST .1 -s � N . - 11 - p* -----i ...\ I _ -. . . ,.. .. ,... r....r ii _, ■ ci7.TiprA t � ` / oww 2S102CC-00500 2S103DD-00800 EXHIBIT 13500 PACIFIC CORP D W SIVERS CO BY CAPOZZOLI ADVISORY FOR 4730 SW MACADAM AVE SUITE 101 PENSIONS INC PORTLAND,OR 97201 21500 HAGGERTY ROAD SUITE 100 NORTHVILLE,MI 48167 2S103DA-06200 2S102CC-03500 BLAIR BARRY V&LINDA F DAVIS STEPHEN GROMER 13490 SW WATKINS AVE 10315 SW MCDONALD ST TIGARD, OR 97223 TIGARD,OR 97224 2S102CC-01700 2S102CC-00600 BRITTAIN FRANCIS L TRUST DDHK VENTURES LLC 10285 SW HILLVIEW 12604 SW 60TH CT TIGARD,OR 97223 PORTLAND,OR 97219 2S102CC-08500 2S102CC-00701 C H S INVESTMENT CO DDHK VENTURES LLC PMB 186 12604 SW 60TH CT 2020-C 8TH AVE PORTLAND,OR 97219 WEST LINN,OR 97068 2S 102CC-02000 2S 103DD-01201 CABE CLIFFORD C&SHARON M DICKERHOOF M EUGENE/NOREEN& 10195 SW HILLVIEW ST DICKERHOOF DARREN E& TIGARD,OR 97223 DICKERHOOF MATTHEW G PO BOX 1583 CORVALLIS,OR 97339 2S102CC-08400 2S102CC-01600 CAPRI MICHAEL J DORTON MARGIE E BY CHS INVESTMENTS 10315 SW HILLVIEW ST PMB 186 TIGARD,OR 97223 2020-C 8TH AVE WEST LINN,OR 97068 2S103DD-00200 2S102CC-03001 CEARLEY DARRELL A& FAGAN BETSY ANGELA M 10350 SW HILLVIEW ST 13530 SW WATKINS AVE TIGARD,OR 97223 TIGARD,OR 97223 2S103DD-00433 2S103DD-00700 CHAMBERLAIN JOHN A AND GILBERTSON LLOYD DEBRA A DARLENE J 10710 SW FAIRHAVEN WAY 15980 SW COLONY PLACE TIGARD,OR 97223 TIGARD,OR 97223 2S102CC-08300 2S102CC-02600 CHS INVESTMENTS CO GILL EDWARD W& PMB 186 CORYELL JANET L 2020-C 8TH AVE 13885 SW 102ND AVE WEST LINN,OR 97068 TIGARD,OR 97223 2 S 103 D D-00300 2S 103DD-00432 COLLINS LEEANNE& HAMMES DAVID A AND RAMIREZ KEVIN VICKE S 13570 SW WATKINS AVE 10740 SW FAIRHAVEN WAY TIGARD,OR 97223 TIGARD,OR 97223 • 2S102CC-03400 2S102CC-08200 HAMPTON DANIEL L&CHERISSE M MERCADO PEDRO R&ANA M L 10345 SW MCDONALD 13915 SW 104TH AVE TIGARD,OR 97224 TIGARD,OR 97223 2S102CC-01800 2S102CC-03302 HART JAMES A VIRGINIA A MORRIS MICHAEL D&LINDA B 10255 SW HILLVIEW DRIVE 10375 SW MCDONALD ST TIGARD,OR 97223 TIGARD,OR 97223 2S102CC-00700 2S102CC-03300 HORTON DENNIS M&ELISABETH A MORRIS MICHAEL D&LINDA B 19220 VIEW DR 10375 SW MCDONALD ST WEST LINN,OR 97068 TIGARD,OR 97223 2S102CC-08100 2S102CC-02800 HOUSING AUTHORITY OF MULLINS MICHAEL C&JUDITH E WASHINGTON COUNTY 10330 SW HILLVIEW 111 NE LINCOLN ST#200-L TIGARD,OR 97223 HILLSBORO,OR 97124 2S102CC-01200 2S102CC-02500 INTERNATIONAL CHURCH OF THE FOUR NELSON WILLARD&ALICE 1910 W SUNSET BLVD#200 TRUSTEES LOS ANGELES,CA 90026 13900 SW 102ND TIGARD,OR 97223 2S 102CC-02900 2S103DD-00401 JOHNSON GLORIA JEAN OWENS JOHN W&DEBORAH A 10290 SW HILLVIEW ST 13525 SW WATKINS TIGARD,OR 97223 TIGARD,OR 97223 2S102CC-07700 2S102CC-03600 KAUFMAN KARL G&TERESA M PECK ALAN W& 10385 SW HILLVIEW RATHBUN ELIZABETH A TIGARD,OR 97224 13995 SW 102ND AVE TIGARD,OR 97223 2S102CC-01000 2S102CB-01800 KUBIN CARON PUBLIC STORAGE 520 SW 6TH AVE#400 INSTITUTIONAL FUND PORTLAND,OR 97204 DEPT PT-OR26410 PO BOX 25025 GLENDALE,CA 91201 2S103DD-00437 2S103DD-00900 LOUCKS HARLOW C&COLLEEN REORGANIZED CHURCH OF JESUS 13605 SW WATKINS AVE CHRIST OF LATTER DAY SAINTS TIGARD,OR 97223 BY COMMUNITY OF CHRIST 13855 SW PACIFIC HWY TIGARD,OR 97223 2S102CC-08700 2S102CC-01400 MAYFIELD ROBERT R II RIPLEY GLENN D AND PENNY G DRIFTLAAN 33 10375 SW HILLVIEW ST BLARICUM,NE 1261JH TIGARD,OR 97223 2S102CC-01500 2S102CC-08600 RISING ROBERT& UNVERZAGT AARIC D& RISING VICKI B ELEANOR 10345 SW HILLVIEW St 13845 SW 104TH TIGARD,OR 97223 TIGARD,OR 97223 2S102CC-03000 2S102CC-01900 SHEHORN LINDA K UPHOFF ELNOR ANN& 10360 SW HILLVIEW ST RICHARD C TRUSTEES TIGARD,OR 97223 10225 SW HILL VIEW ST TIGARD,OR 97223 2S 103 D D-00402 2S 102CC-00802 SPANIOL MICHAEL R&CAROLYN S UPHOFF RICHARD C AND ELNOR ANN 10605 SW FAIRHAVEN ST 10225 SW HILL VIEW ST TIGARD,OR 97223 TIGARD,OR 97223 2S102CC-03301 2S102CC-08000 SPECIALIZED HOUSING INC VANDENBOS TIMOTHY TR 5319 SW WESTGATE DR#124 10415 SW HILLVIEW ST PORTLAND,OR 97221 TIGARD,OR 97223 2S102CC-07900 2S103DD-00100 SPENCE GEORGIA V VITIRITTI PIETRO&PASQUALINA 10405 SW HILLVIEW ST TRUSTEES TIGARD, OR 97223 14115 SW 157TH TIGARD,OR 97224 2S10300-00435 2S103DD-00436 STEVENS WILLIAM A&SARAH E WARD MARION M 10650 SW FAIRHAVEN ST 10600 SW FAIRHAVEN TIGARD, OR 97223 TIGARD,OR 97223 2 S 102C C-08900 2 S 102C C-03200 STILES DIANNE D WESTOVER PHILIP S AND 13947 SW 104TH AVE CHRISTINE M TIGARD, OR 97224 10340 SW HILLVIEW ST TIGARD,OR 97223 2S102CC-02700 2S103DD-00500 TAYLOR PETER H B J WILSON'S TIGARD RETAIL CENTER IN 13965 SW 102ND BY OCM ESCROW ADMINISTRATION TIGARD,OR 97223 MAILROOM/ESCROW 1717 MAIL ST 8TH FLOOR DALLAS,TX 75201 2S 1030 D-00600 2S1 03D D-00400 TIGARD GRANGE NO. 148 WILSON'S TIGARD RETAIL CENTER IN BY PHILIP R.YOUNT TREASURER BY OCM ESCROW ADMINISTRATION 11222 COTTONWOOD LANE MAILROOM/ESCROW TIGARD,OR 97223 1717 MAIL ST 8TH FLOOR DALLAS,TX 75201 2S102CC-01100 2S102CC-07800 TIGARD LODGE NO 207 WOOD KATHERINE M OF AF&AM 10395 SW HILLVIEW ST ATTN JOHN HAVERY SECY TIGARD,OR 97223 P O BOX 230184 TIGARD,OR 97281 251030D-00434 ZANDONATTI ALLEN F 10680 SW FAIRHAVEN WAY TIGARD,OR 97223 T-Mobile Wireless Attn: Jim Barta 1500 NE Irving Street, Suite 530 Portland, OR 97232 Jack Biethan John Frewing 11023 SW Summerfield Drive, #4 7110 SW Lola Lane Tigard, OR 97224 Tigard, OR 97223 Kristen Miller CPO 4B 8940 SW Edgewood Street 16200 SW Pacific Highway, Suite H242 Tigard, OR 97223 Tigard, OR 97224 Paul Owen 10335 SW Highland Drive Tigard, OR 97224 Tim Esau PO Box 230695 Tigard, OR 97281 Nathan and Ann Murdock PO Box 231265 Tigard, OR 97281 Ross Sundberg 16382 SW 104th Avenue Tigard, OR 97224 Brian Wegener 9830 SW Kimberly Drive Tigard, OR 97224 J. Dyar 10430 SW Century Oak Drive Tigard, OR 97224 Rex Caffall 13205 SW Village Glenn Tigard, OR 97223 Josh Thomas 10395 SW Bonanza Tigard, OR 97224 CITY OF TIGARD - SOUTH CIT SUBCOMMITTEE (pg. I of I) (i:\curpin\setup\labels\CIT South.doc) UPDATED: 15-Jan-04 AFFIDAVIT OF POSTING NOTICE OF A LAND USE PROPOSAL IMPORTANT NOTICE: THIS AFFIDAVIT MUST BE ACCOMPANIED BY A COPY OF THE NOTICE THAT WAS POSTED ON THE SITE. In the Matter of the Proposed Land Use Applications for: Land Use File Nos.: SDR2003-00018 Land Use File Name: T-MOBILE WIRELESS MONOPOLE TOWER I, Morgan Tracy, Associate Planner for the City of Tigard, do affirm that I posted notice of the land use proposal affecting the land located at tstate the approximate location(s) IF no address(s) and/or tax lot(s) currently registered) 1360U 5w CtFt 14fyiw and did personally post notice of the proposed land use a Itcation s by means of weatherproof P Yp P p PP ( ) Y P posting in the general vicinity of the affected territory, a copy of said notice being hereto attached and by reference made a part hereof, on the /21' day of br&c , 2004. //k - Signature of rrson Who erformed Posting (In the presence of the Notary) (THIS SECTION FOR A STATE OF OREGON, NOTARY PUBLIC TO COMPLETE/NOTARIZE) STATE OF OREGON ) County of Washington ) ss. Subscribed and sworn/affiimed before me on the / ;/ day of reMiahy7 , 20 (� c},-/- o OFFICIAL SEAL J BENGTSON NOTARY PU= C OF OREGON .,vTARY PUBLIC-OREGON ISSION N0.368086 My Commission Expires: MY COMMISSION EXPIRES APR.27,2007 h.Vogin\pattylmasters\affdavit of posting for applicant to post public hearing.doc 1-MOBILE WIRELESS MONOPOLE TOWED SITE DEVELOPMENT REVIEW (SDR) 2003-00018 REQUEST: The applicant is requesting Site Development Review approval to construct a new wireless communications facility consisting of a 100-foot monopole tower and BTS radio transmitting equipment cabinets mounted on the ground adjacent to the monopole. The proposed lease area will be placed within a fenced enclosure LOCATION: 13680 SW Pacific Highway; WCTM 2S102CC, Tax Lot 1100. ZONE: C- G: General Commercial District. The C-G zoning district is designed to accommodate a full range of retail, office and civic uses with a city-wide and even regional trade area. Except where non-conforming, residential uses are limited to single-family residences which are located on the same site as a permitted use. A wide range of uses, including but not limited to adult entertainment, automotive equipment repair and storage, mini- warehouses, utilities, heliports, medical centers, major event entertainment, and gasoline stations, are permitted conditionally. APPLICABLE REVIEW CRITERIA: Community Development Code Chapters 18.370, 18.390, 18.520, 18.705, 18.730. 18.745, 18.765, 18.790, 18.795, 18.798 and 18.810. Further information may be obtained from the Planning Division (staff contact: Morgan Tracy, Associate Planner) at 13125 SW Hall Blvd., Tigard, Oregon 97223, or by calling 503-639-4171 or by e-mail to morgan(a�ci.tigard.or.us. A copy of the application and all documents and evidence submitted by or on behalf of the applicant and the applicable criteria are available for inspection at no cost and copies for all items can also be provided at a reasonable cost. vt � - - CITY of TIGARD GE nC-+APHIC INFORMATION SYSTEM j , ` AREA H0 flF7 m j / / /" (500') r-- - `� - I COOK LN > �� I 1 r �' I cn : , FOR: SDR03 00018 Z MOBIi2rTwE03E WIRELESS 1 ' f R . UPDD MAILIN LABELS �L thwMiu s>e O� AVEN r ST il M ann ' T Property ner information ----! y is valid fo months fr om N the date printed on this map. > /../cz- ,.-,,- - - ,' ,, . ,.....,, \\:,,,,,,- ,. ,/,‘ ,,,.,3,--iii.,,,:;:,,,,,,i,',,,s; ,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,:,:,,,,s,,i?,,,,l'i,,,JI:ip„,,,,,,,,,,i,,,,i,-„iiii,t11,,,,,,,,,,;:ilk,,,,,9,,,,:,,,,!,,,,,,,,,,,,,,i.,:.,',,,,--,,,,, 4t -14-:-.;;;S, ' ,,,,,\,\--,,.,,,Ig.5„,t;*146' :::."':",,7-1',-'7,:,:),y,:',i,::., ::::::-;:!''' '',',!,i,:i:-:1§ --;::'' : Mq 'w 5 �9�" '11�' �2 >e 1fnuMUw� A '1274:';41::7:'(..:',' HILL VIEW ST I, ( ,., fM �- ',','�,. v F 0 100 200 300 400 Feel ` t 1rl 3 •e 1'=263 feet 7 ,,,,,,,,,.„.„,,,,.„,,,„,,,, :„,,,,„.,,,,.., ,,,,,,, F Q ", I!,.,::: .,,:.,,,,,„,. : ,.;,,:,,,,,:., D i of Tigar . gw�lr,„,, _ ■ d V ^. $ ' IMOI1119Ion On 17115 map is fa general location Only and / ' a,.< - ". — — r z -" •i'!�� " ' shgiid be vefl6ed wlh the Devsopment Services Division. —. " —_- - -- —---- 13125 SW Hall filed Tigxd,OR 97223 = / / 1 G� I I II _ - (503)6334171 http:rlww .cigaro.«.us Community Development Plot date:Feb 10,2004;C:lmagic\MAGIC03.APR 2S102CC-00500 2S103DD-00800 13500 PACIFIC CORP D W SIVERS CO BY CAPOZZOLI ADVISORY FOR 4730 SW MACADAM AVE SUITE 101 PENSIONS INC PORTLAND,OR 97201 21500 HAGGERTY ROAD SUITE 100 NORTHVILLE,MI 48167 2 S 103 DA-06200 2 S 102C C-03500 BLAIR BARRY V&LINDA F DAVIS STEPHEN GROMER 13490 SW WATKINS AVE 10315 SW MCDONALD ST TIGARD, OR 97223 TIGARD,OR 97224 2S 102CC-01700 2S102CC-00600 BRITTAIN FRANCIS L TRUST DDHK VENTURES LLC 10285 SW HILLVIEW 12604 SW 60TH CT TIGARD, OR 97223 PORTLAND,OR 97219 2S102CC-08500 2S102CC-00701 C H S INVESTMENT CO DDHK VENTURES LLC PMB 186 12604 SW 60TH CT 2020-C 8TH AVE PORTLAND,OR 97219 WEST LINN,OR 97068 2S102CC-02000 2S103DD-01201 CABE CLIFFORD C&SHARON M DICKERHOOF M EUGENE/NOREEN& 10195 SW HILLVIEW ST DICKERHOOF DARREN E& TIGARD,OR 97223 DICKERHOOF MATTHEW G PO BOX 1583 CORVALLIS,OR 97339 2S102CC-08400 2S102CC-01600 CAPRI MICHAEL J DORTON MARGIE E BY CHS INVESTMENTS 10315 SW HILLVIEW ST PMB 186 TIGARD,OR 97223 2020-C 8TH AVE WEST LINN,OR 97068 2 S 103 D D-00200 2 S 102C C-03001 CEARLEY DARRELL A& FAGAN BETSY ANGELA M 10350 SW HILLVIEW ST 13530 SW WATKINS AVE TIGARD,OR 97223 TIGARD, OR 97223 2S103DD-00433 2S103DD-00700 CHAMBERLAIN JOHN A AND GILBERTSON LLOYD DEBRA A DARLENE J 10710 SW FAIRHAVEN WAY 15980 SW COLONY PLACE TIGARD, OR 97223 TIGARD,OR 97223 2S102CC-08300 2S102CC-02600 CHS INVESTMENTS CO GILL EDWARD W& PMB 186 CORYELL JANET L 2020-C 8TH AVE 13885 SW 102ND AVE WEST LINN, OR 97068 TIGARD,OR 97223 2S103DD-00300 2S103DD-00432 COLLINS LEEANNE & HAMMES DAVID A AND RAMIREZ KEVIN VICKE S 13570 SW WATKINS AVE 10740 SW FAIRHAVEN WAY TIGARD, OR 97223 TIGARD,OR 97223 2S1 02C C-03400 2S1 02CC-08200 HAMPTON DANIEL L&CHERISSE M MERCADO PEDRO R&ANA M L 10345 SW MCDONALD 13915 SW 104TH AVE TIGARD,OR 97224 TIGARD,OR 97223 2S102CC-01800 2S102CC-03302 HART JAMES A VIRGINIA A MORRIS MICHAEL D&LINDA B 10255 SW HILLVIEW DRIVE 10375 SW MCDONALD ST TIGARD,OR 97223 TIGARD,OR 97223 2 S 102 C C-00700 2 S 102 CC-03300 HORTON DENNIS M&ELISABETH A MORRIS MICHAEL D&LINDA B 19220 VIEW DR 10375 SW MCDONALD ST WEST LINN,OR 97068 TIGARD,OR 97223 2S102CC-08100 2S102CC-02800 HOUSING AUTHORITY OF MULLINS MICHAEL C&JUDITH E WASHINGTON COUNTY 10330 SW HILLVIEW 111 NE LINCOLN ST#200-L TIGARD,OR 97223 HILLSBORO,OR 97124 2 S 102C C-01200 2S 102CC-02500 INTERNATIONAL CHURCH OF THE FOUR NELSON WILLARD&ALICE 1910 W SUNSET BLVD#200 TRUSTEES LOS ANGELES, CA 90026 13900 SW 102ND TIGARD,OR 97223 2S102CC-02900 2S103DD-00401 JOHNSON GLORIA JEAN OWENS JOHN W&DEBORAH A 10290 SW HILLVIEW ST 13525 SW WATKINS TIGARD, OR 97223 TIGARD,OR 97223 2S1 02CC-07700 2S 102C C-03600 KAUFMAN KARL G &TERESA M PECK ALAN W& 10385 SW HILLVIEW RATHBUN ELIZABETH A TIGARD, OR 97224 13995 SW 102ND AVE TIGARD,OR 97223 2S102CC-01000 2S102CB-01800 KUBIN CARON PUBLIC STORAGE 520 SW 6TH AVE#400 INSTITUTIONAL FUND PORTLAND,OR 97204 DEPT PT-OR26410 PO BOX 25025 GLENDALE,CA 91201 2 S 103 DD-00437 2S 103 D D-00900 LOUCKS HARLOW C&COLLEEN REORGANIZED CHURCH OF JESUS 13605 SW WATKINS AVE CHRIST OF LATTER DAY SAINTS TIGARD, OR 97223 BY COMMUNITY OF CHRIST 13855 SW PACIFIC HWY TIGARD,OR 97223 2S102CC-08700 2S102CC-01400 MAYFIELD ROBERT R II RIPLEY GLENN D AND PENNY G DRIFTLAAN 33 10375 SW HILLVIEW ST BLARICUM, NE 1261JH TIGARD,OR 97223 2S102CC-01500 2S102CC-08600 RISING ROBERT& UNVERZAGT AARIC D& RISING VICKI B ELEANOR 10345 SW HILLVIEW ST 13845 SW 104TH TIGARD,OR 97223 TIGARD,OR 97223 2S102CC-03000 2S102CC-01900 SHEHORN LINDA K UPHOFF ELNOR ANN& 10360 SW HILLVIEW ST RICHARD C TRUSTEES TIGARD, OR 97223 10225 SW HILL VIEW ST TIGARD,OR 97223 2S1 03 D D-00402 2S 102C C-00802 SPANIOL MICHAEL R&CAROLYN S UPHOFF RICHARD C AND ELNOR ANN 10605 SW FAIRHAVEN ST 10225 SW HILL VIEW ST TIGARD, OR 97223 TIGARD,OR 97223 2S102CC-03301 2S102CC-08000 SPECIALIZED HOUSING INC VANDENBOS TIMOTHY TR 5319 SW WESTGATE DR#124 10415 SW HILLVIEW ST PORTLAND, OR 97221 TIGARD,OR 97223 2S102CC-07900 2S1030D-00100 SPENCE GEORGIA V VITIRITTI PIETRO&PASQUALINA 10405 SW HILLVIEW ST TRUSTEES TIGARD, OR 97223 14115 SW 157TH TIGARD,OR 97224 2S 103 D D-00435 2S 103 D D-00436 STEVENS WILLIAM A&SARAH E WARD MARION M 10650 SW FAIRHAVEN ST 10600 SW FAIRHAVEN TIGARD, OR 97223 TIGARD,OR 97223 2S 1 O2CC-08900 2S 102C C-03200 STILES DIANNE D WESTOVER PHILIP S AND 13947 SW 104TH AVE CHRISTINE M TIGARD,OR 97224 10340 SW HILLVIEW ST TIGARD,OR 97223 2S102CC-02700 2S103DD-00500 TAYLOR PETER H B J WILSON'S TIGARD RETAIL CENTER IN 13965 SW 102ND BY OCM ESCROW ADMINISTRATION TIGARD,OR 97223 MAILROOM/ESCROW 1717 MAIL ST 8TH FLOOR DALLAS,TX 75201 2 S 103 D D-00600 2 S 103 D D-00400 TIGARD GRANGE NO 148 WILSON'S TIGARD RETAIL CENTER IN BY PHILIP R. YOUNT TREASURER BY OCM ESCROW ADMINISTRATION 11222 COTTONWOOD LANE MAILROOM/ESCROW TIGARD,OR 97223 1717 MAIL ST 8TH FLOOR DALLAS,TX 75201 2S102CC-01100 2S102CC-07800 TIGARD LODGE NO 207 WOOD KATHERINE M OF AF &AM 10395 SW HILLVIEW ST ATTN JOHN HAVERY SECY TIGARD,OR 97223 P 0 BOX 230184 TIGARD,OR 97281 Z4NO D'°0434 10680 SW BARD, DR 9 2 3VEN WAY Jack Biethan John Frewing 11023 SW Summerfield Drive, #4 7110 SW Lola Lane Tigard, OR 97224 Tigard, OR 97223 Kristen Miller CPO 4B 8940 SW Edgewood Street 16200 SW Pacific Highway, Suite H242 Tigard, OR 97223 Tigard, OR 97224 Paul Owen 10335 SW Highland Drive Tigard, OR 97224 Tim Esau PO Box 230695 Tigard, OR 97281 Nathan and Ann Murdock PO Box 231265 Tigard, OR 97281 Ross Sundberg 16382 SW 104th Avenue Tigard, OR 97224 Brian Wegener 9830 SW Kimberly Drive Tigard, OR 97224 J. Dyar 10430 SW Century Oak Drive Tigard, OR 97224 Rex Caffall 13205 SW Village Glenn Tigard, OR 97223 Josh Thomas 10395 SW Bonanza Tigard, OR 97224 CITY OF TIGARD - SOUTH CIT SUBCOMMITTEE (pg. I of I) (i:\curpin\setup\labels\CIT South.doc) UPDATED: 15-Jan-04 APPLICANT MATERIALS PRE-APP.HELD BY: """ CITY OF TIGARD PLANNING DIVISION 13125 SW HALL BOULEVARD TIGARD, OR 97223-8189 503.639.4171/503.684.7297 CITY OF TIGARD OREGON LAND USE PERMIT APPLICATION File# b e 7 oo3-(Jck0I Other Case# 2,Dk3 3—00 07-5 Date 1,9711 C9 By K91 Receipt# 531 JCity ... Urb Date Complete TYPE OF PERMIT YOU ARE APPLYING FOR ❑AdjustmentNariance (I or II) ❑ Minor Land Partition (II) ❑ Zone Change (III) ❑ Comprehensive Plan Amendment(IV) ❑ Planned Development (III) ❑ Zone Change Annexation (IV) ❑ Conditional Use (III) ❑ Sensitive Lands Review(I, II or III) ❑ Zone Ordinance Amendment (IV) ❑ Historic Overlay(II or III) 'Site Development Review (II) ❑ Home Occupation (II) ❑ Subdivision (II or III) LOCAL ION WHERE PROPOSED ACTIVITY WILL OCCUR(Address if available) cca) s 1)- ��y� 1 AX MAP& 1 AX LO f NOS. Zs .1- 0ZCC 0 11 00 TOl AL SI I E SIZE ZONING CLASSIFICAI ION I .00 4c. c G — G4 1 C'04,"Ltc,ci APPLICANT' I_ ��/ 'T—'I d' i EhI)E 5 5 MAILING AA RE55 /�/'SrTAT IF 1 r ,1 PHONENOOO „kr .1 N/NULL , S S3RO , �O�LANJD 1 V- p/13Z. SL/y — Z42c, 5—v3 -- 736 —3o) i PRIMARY CON fAC f PERSON PHONE NO. J111.-1 t34- z. 503 — SyW— 2-`1741 PROPERI Y OWNER/DEED HOLDER(Attach list if more than one) MAILING AL/DRESS/CITY/STATE/ZIP PHONE0NO.BO}( 230 i1 -i , POR IL AN b F O. GI 1-74 ) 5133— 6Zf *When the owner and the applicant are different people, the applicant must be purchaser of record or a lessee in possession with written authorization from the owner or an agent of the owner. The ners must sign this application in the space provided on the back of this form or submit a written authorization with this application. PROPOSAL SUMMARY(Please be specific) Ae w e a-u-4-)) 3• /'T'f� U N f c1 P66.1.1 N'if l I f v H COA/s I S c a /00 Nl o '/a ro L I rCX WD 10v I, at MT 01,714iA' -, 2o/ X z-c/ wetpc t9t2F. a n/ -rte- f( o PEacry . APPLICATIONS WILL NOT BE ACCEPTED WITHOUT ALL OF THE REQUIRED SUBMITTAL ELEMENTS AS DESCRIBED IN THE "BASIC SUBMITTAL REQUIREMENTS" INFORMATION SHEET. . 1 V THE APPLICANT SHALL CERTIFY THAT: ♦ If the application is granted, the applicant shall exercise the rights granted in accordance with the terms and subject to all the conditions and limitations of the approval. ♦ All the above statements and the statements in the plot plan, attachments, and exhibits transmitted herewith, are true; and the applicants so acknowledge that any permit issued, based on this application, map be revoked if it is found that any such statements are false. ♦ The applicant has read the entire contents of the application, including the policies and criteria, and understands the requirements for approving or denying the application(s). SIGNATURES OF EACH OWNER OF THE SUBJECT PROPERTY ARE REQUIRED. ;fez 4ajj Owner's Signature Date Owner's Signature Date Owner's Signature Date Owner's Signature Date Owner's Signature Date (L/r/o ? (1"4---App cant/Agent/Representative's Signature Date Applicant/Agent/Representative's Signature Date :FIRST RI-EERICRN TITLE 503 790 7872 2002.12-11 11:S0 #435 P.24/44 t AMER.( ..--. 'y First American Title Insurance Company of Oregon Washington(OR) Prepared For: Prepared By CHRIS BURDICK Customer Service Department 1700 SW Fourth Avenue - Portland,Oregon 97201-5512 Phone:(503)222-3651 Fax:(503)790-7872 I _ OWNERSHIP INFORMATION Owner ;Tigard Lodge No 207 Ref Parcel Number :2S102CC 01100 CoOwner :Of AE,Am T:02S R:01W S:02 Q:252 Site Address :13680 SW Pacific Hwy Tigard 97223 Parcel Member :R0466604 Mail Address :PO Box 230184 Tigard Or 97281 i Map Number . Telephone :Owner: Tenant: I County :Washington(OR) SALES AND LOAN INFORMATION Transferred Loan Amount . Document# :8740529 ;Lender . Sale Price ;Loan Type .• Deed Type i Interest Rate %Owned i Vesting Type PROPERTY DESCRIPTION I ASSESSMENT AND TAX INFORMATION Map Page&Grid :655 D5 MktLand :$523,380 • Census :Duct:308.01 Block 4 MktStructure Subdivision/Flue i MkQ . Neighborhood Cd :7PHY MktTotal :$523,380 Land Use :9552 Soc,Fratcrnal Organization M50Assd Total : Legal :ACRES 1.09,NON-ASSESSABLE i %Improved . 01-02 Taxes Exempt Amount :$523,380 I Exempt Type :Exempt Levy Code :02374 Millage Rate :15.6423 PROPERTY CHARACTERISTICS 1 i Bedrooms Lot Aces ;: 1.09 Year Built .• Bathrooms Lot SqFt ;:47,480 E,fYearBlt . Heat Method Bsm FM SqFt Floor Cover . Pool Bsm Unfit!SqFt; : Foundation Appliances Bsm Low SqFt !: Roof Shape . Dishwasher Bldg SqFt Roof Matt . Hood Fan 1st Flr SqFt 1 : InteriorMat . Deck Upper Fir SqFt . Paving Mad Garage Type Porch SqFt j : Const Type . Garage SF Attic SgFr . I : Ext Finish . Deck SgFt I This title information has been furnished.without charge,in conformance with tie guidelines approved by the State of Oregon Insure= Commissioner. The Insurance Division cautions intermediaries that this service is designed to benefit the ultimate insureds. Indiscriminate use only benefiting Intermediaries will not be permitted. Said services may be discontinued. No lability Is assumed for any envois In this report • hL FiLL Wit 1 ?2-ew.ar VoiceStnanr/ R E C E S S LETTER OF INTEREST DATE: SAN. 8, 7-vo3 SITE NAME &NUMBER: Pa-4'031- 1(.t0 Ct OWNER/OWNER'S AGENT: T((I AR-t) CopGE NO , 201- SITE ADDRESS: 13( $0 5w RAc tfic 14ts( 'ri Cxtt� oR. 91-223 PHONE NUMBER: , Apt 600 > 503.634.065 RtcH 14km-10 501446.40M. Re: Letter of Interest to Lease Land/Space to Locate Wireless Communications Facility VoiceStream PCS I LLC("VoiceStream")is building a cellular communications network in Oregon/Washington to provide Personal Communications Services(PCS)for area residents. We are installing communications facilities in the area, including towers with antennas installed on them. We lease small amounts of land or rooftop space, from many different landlords around the state in order to build,use, and maintain our network. Your property is one of many in your general area that may meet our objectives. We are interested in studying your property to determine if our communications facility would be feasible if located on your property. The tests we perform include radio frequency tests, environmental assessments, zoning feasibility, and construction feasibility studies. We may obtain a title report,perform surveys, conduct soil tests and other engineering procedures on,under and over your property to determine if the property will be compatible with our engineering specifications, systems,designs, operations and required government approvals. Only after all tests and studies are completed can we determine if we can build a facility on your property. If your site is selected, we would then negotiate to enter into a lease. We negotiate a fair lease per month per year for 5 years,with five option periods that could extend the lease 25 additional years. This letter additionally allows VoiceStream Wireless to obtain land-use approval and building permit approval from governmental jurisdictions, as is necessary to gain approval from those jurisdictions. All tests, studies and applications shall be at the sole cost and risk of VoiceStream Wireless. If any portion of the property is disturbed by VoiceStream,VoiceStream shall restore/repair any such areas to their original condition prior to the activity. Both the owner and/or owner's agent and VoiceStream Wireless acknowledge that no representations or commitments have been made that a lease agreement(or similar agreement)concerning this property will be entered into in the near future. Execution of this letter by owner or owner's agent and VoiceStream Wireless confirms the understanding of the parties on these matters and allows approval to perform the above referenced tests and permitting. Owner/Agent: �-f'• �1-_ �� Date: 1 D i � l Site Acquisition Specialist: ��' Date: -2/3 / AFFIDAVIT OF MAILIh,/POSTING NEIGHBORHOOj MEETING NOTICE IMPORTANT NOTICE: THE APPLICANT IS REQUIRED TO MAIL THE CITY OF TIGARD A COPY OF THE NEIGHBORHOOD MEETING NOTICE THAT PERTAINS TO THIS AFFIDAVIT AT THE SAME TIME PROPERTY OWNERS ARE MAILED NOTICE, TO THE ADDRESS BELOW: City of Tigard Planning Division 13125 SW Hall Boulevard Tigard, OR 97223-8189 IN ADDITION, THE APPLICANT SHALL SUBMIT THIS AFFIDAVIT & COPIES OF ALL NOTICES AT THE TIME OF APPLICATION. MAILING: oo ,A�// I, .�cnl bc, , being duly sworn, depose and say that on the `4� day of /I'aVPimA•t� 20 J . I caused to have mailed to each of the persons gli the ached list, a notice of a meeting to discuss a proposed development at(or near) Iwo Sw P6-c I F i L y ,T-1174,0 02 ,a copy of which notice so mailed is attached hereto and made a part of hereof' • I further state that said notices were enclosed in envelopes plainly addressed to said persons and were deposited on the date indicated above in the United States Post Office located at i( ZJ.} - S�V,E,wf14..99/x ,f oRTL 4-iJJ O( , with postage prepaid thereon. �(In the presence of a Notary Public) POSTING: I, ,)C-1".1 i Q(--4/Oh , do affirm that I am (represent) the party initiating interest in a proposed r,J►R&i..,c s f F'-C r L11-7 affecting the land located at (state the_ approximate location(s) IF no address(s) and/or tax lot(s)currently registered) /e/y'O St- Mt 1 f IC its v Y /I) C/ j c7re and did on the '-� day of currently , 20 0? personally post notice indicating that the site may be proposed for a S'i 1" f tc-VCt4 RE V/application, and the time, date and place of a neighborhood meeting to discuss the proposal. The sign was posted at / b Y 7 U S 41 ,PA c ita 117 j4' Ti i 6?e P v' (state location you posted notice on property) Signature (In the presence of a Notary Public) (THIS SECTION FOR A STATE OF OREGON, NOTARY PUBLIC TO COMPLETE:/NOTARIZE) STATE OF gt-ef4an ) County of )haittmrn4.k- ) ss. Subscribed and sworn/affirmed before me on the / day of )1 -' - , 20 03 . OFFICIAL SEAL • DIANNE I.NOM\'L, WOW Pt LI.ONEOON COMMISSION NO.A3*41 MYCOME6SION deh. NOTARY PUBL OF OREGON My Commission Expires: 9- o . moot/ Applicant, please complete the information below: NAME OF PROJECT OR PROPOSED DEVELOPMENT: TYPE OF PROPOSED DEVELOPMENT: Address or General Location of Subject Property: Subject Property Tax Map(s)and Lot#(s): h:\loginlpatty\masters\affidavit of mailing-posting neighborhood meeting.doc i, r, 4 File Number 6 Sensitive Area Pre-Screening Site Assessment • riviin iii 9 ent Jurisdiction c1 t 64'-I Date I) 121/0.? Map &Tax Lot 25 1-0 Z-CC! O I l00 Owner -fie,e---01 Zvi jr #2-0-9. Site Address 13 6 PO , 'w 'Uc_%icc oz„i T yoll 1 OR 41 -223 Contact J t r►, 842"I'?4- chi T-a1. i/C Proposed Activity Gil lee lei; gt,/0 Address 1 so N& 1 vjjvt, i SAC rsx. No 3 v ��k Po�T1.�1N 9 , 02 �/z�'Z p G-,4,,,ds Phone So 3 - 5 '1-i "V/ Z1 Official use only below this line Y N NA Y N NA /� ❑ ❑ Sensitive Area Composite Map Stormwater Infrastructure maps `� ` Map# 2.5/tt/1¢ ❑ ❑ " QS# cry/r ❑ ❑ m Locally adopted studies or maps ® ❑ ❑ Other Specify Specify 2ooa .r r,,.,�l fok•ro Based on a review of the above information and the requirements of Clean Water Services Design and Construction Standards Resolution and Order No. 03-11: ❑ Sensitive areas potentially exist on site or within 200'of the site. THE APPLICANT MUST PERFORM A SITE CERTIFICATION PRIOR TO ISSUANCE OF A SERVICE PROVIDER LETTER OR STORMWATER CONNECTION PERMIT. If Sensitive Areas exist on the site or within 200 feet on adjacent properties, a Natural Resources Assessment Report may also be required. [2 Sensitive areas do not appear to exist on site or within 200' of the site. This pre- screening site assessment does NOT eliminate the need to evaluate and protect water quality sensitive areas if they are subsequently discovered on your property. NO FURTHER SITE ASSESSMENT OR SERVICE PROVIDER LETTER IS REQUIRED. THIS FORM WILL SERVE AS AUTHORIZATION TO ISSUE A STORMWATER CONNECTION PERMIT. ❑ The proposed activity does not meet the definition of development. NO SITE ASSESSMENT OR SERVICE PROVIDER LETTER IS REQUIRED. Comments: / GjeuPd�* L'/y feeS•'T%ve ct Y _ ge,L°ctyt To e �O.Dcol Reviewed By: Date: 6//2-6/0 3 Returned to Applicant Mail Q( Fax Counter Date / ..2.6/o3 By 155 N First Avenue,Suite 270•Hillsboro,Oregon 97124 Phone: (503)846-8621 •Fax: (503)846-3525•www.cleanwaterservices.org /VCZrrcZT V€.. SITE DEVELOPMENT REVIEW NARRATIVE T-Mobile Wireless Site PO-4037C (King City) Radio Frequency Transmission Facility 13680 SW Pacific Hwy RECEIVED Tigard, OR 'SAN 9 () 2004 December 5, 2003 CITY OF TIGARD Jim Barta—T-Mobile Wireless PLANNING/ENGINEERING 1500 NE Irving, Ste. 530, Portland, OR 97232 (503) 544-2429 PROJECT SUMMARY T-Mobile wireless proposes constructing a new wireless communications facility on the property located at 13680 SW Pacific Highway, Tigard, OR The proposed facility will consist of a 100- foot monopole and BTS radio transmitting equipment cabinets mounted on the ground adjacent to the monopole. The subject parcel is an irregular-shaped parcel comprising 1.09 acres. The property is zoned General Commercial (CG) and is surrounded by commercial and residentially zoned parcels. The proposed monopole and cabinets will be placed within an 18' X 25' lease area on the property which is currently occupied by the Tigard Masonic Lodge. The lease area would be located on the southwest side of the existing lodge building. The proposed lease area would be surrounded by a wood fence and a 5 foot landscape buffer. This proposed facility is needed by T-mobile to supply wireless coverage in this area of Tigard that currently has sub- standard T-mobile coverage. The construction cost estimate for the proposed site is$40,000. SITE DEVELOPMENT REVIEW CRITERIA A. Approval criteria. The Director shall make a finding with respect to each of the following criteria when approving, approving with conditions, or denying an application: 1. Compliance with all of the applicable requirements of this title including Chapter 18.810, Street and Utility Standards Response: The standards contained in 18.810 will be addressed below. 2. Relationship to the natural and physical environment: a. Buildings shall be: (1) Located to preserve existing trees, topography and natural drainage where possible based upon existing site conditions; (2) Located in areas not subject to ground slumping or sliding; (3) Located to provide adequate distance between adjoining buildings for adequate light, air circulation,and fire-fighting; and Radio Frequency Transmission Facility Page (T-Mobile Wireless King City Site,PO-4037C) (4) Oriented with consideration for sun and wind. Response: No trees will be removed for the placement of the new pole. The topography and drainage of the site will not be changed by this development. The slim pole will not block sunlight in any direction and is located so it will not affect circulation in any manner. b. Trees shall be preserved to the extent possible. Replacement of trees is subject to the requirements of Chapter 18.790, Tree Removal. Response: No trees will be removed for this development. 3. Exterior elevations: a. Along the vertical face of single-family attached and multiple-family structures, offsets shall occur at a minimum of every 30 feet by providing any two of the following: (1) Recesses, e.g.,decks, patios, entrances, floor area, of a minimum depth of eight feet; (2) Extensions, e.g.,decks,patios,entrances, floor area,of a minimum depth of eight feet, a maximum length of an overhang shall be 25 feet; and (3) Offsets or breaks in roof elevations of three or more feet in height. Response: The criteria do not apply to the proposed development. 4. Buffering, screening and compatibility between adjoining uses: a. Buffering shall be provided between different types of land uses, for example, between single- family and multiple-family residential, and residential and commercial uses, and the following factors shall be considered in determining the adequacy of the type and extent of the buffer: (1) The purpose of the buffer, for example to decrease noise levels, absorb air pollution, filter dust, or to provide a visual barrier; (2) The size of the buffer required to achieve the purpose in terms of width and height; (3) The direction(s) from which buffering is needed; (4) The required density of the buffering; and (5) Whether the viewer is stationary or mobile. Response: A total of 4 new Vine Maples and 30 Rhododendrons will surround the 15' X 20' lease area containing the ground equipment and new pole. The proposed landscape will meet screening and buffering requirements of the criteria. b. On site screening from view from adjoining properties of such things as service areas, storage areas,parking lots, and mechanical devices on roof tops, i.e.,air cooling and heating systems, shall be provided and the following factors will be considered in determining the adequacy of the type and extent of the screening: (1) What needs to be screened; (2) The direction from which it is needed; (3) How dense the screen needs to be; (4) Whether the viewer is stationary or mobile;and (5) Whether the screening needs to be year around. Radio Frequency Transmission Facility (T-Mobile Wireless King City Site PO-4037C) Page 2 Response:lease se: `� total area of q new meet screening t1�eVine maples S.Structures P t Privacy d noise: buffering requi etne ip�en Rhododendrons feria. ground n which Usti-family or nients of the c�er�'A0k he ill surround t b• the buildings unit which is screened group living uses u. Proposed landscape the 13' properties d ovl hall c oriented d from view by ads Shall 1 Fill uses; to use wh cw rwd notse ill a m by adjoining units provide Private outdoor $a Buffers shall h create noise, light, aver which protects as provided 1 areas for each and sources. be Placed on the s• ght, or glare shall be private spaces in Subsection 6 a h Response; site as recess buffered from adjoining 6. Private The criteria do no necessary to mitigate noise, m adjoining reside xpen outdoor area.mul ' t apply to the pro e, light or glare from residential exclusive use space such tl'frrnil posed develo m°``site Width dimension e ofindiv• h rs a Y use, Prue Ideal Patio or t. width of fo units balcony exits or e Hies used for�feet;and shall be shall be cox Required op n are for the sole°r exits shall at least qg U e fd d$hall �' w)13lco Ic area$P o e nary ices r °f d1e unit;of be considered feel-in size hdaept w h ed for u space.Private outdoor possible,Private°u roofed or enclosed ered as open space on center the Response: paces shall be door open spaces should structures such rs except where such The cr' a ed or designed t be oriented toward recreation center a. Shared outdoor criteria do not apply to provide privacy the S or shall be e addition d door recreation areas: Y t0 the proposed Y for the users o if the following provided in residential fs ul ti-fail development. �e to the �2) redlo up to amounts:requirements of subsections S and (1) b. The required bedroom including two-bedroom �for the shared above, usable out indoor�(1 I ay bbe all outdoo ow spy t o Op s� e enits,2�a c° On use o fall space a (3}It may retreat o outdoor at °r Y be provided per unit square feet per unit; the residents in comet may b 11 publics or ed paw indoor s follows: (5) Mere balconies r recreation milion pa common space;or Pace for example,and are on s and space b a Private;for outdoor tennis n °units balconies unit; cool urn' and the co , and example, it d b Hies shall be an outdo not b o (T-Mobile Frequency Transmission e less�� r tennis 6i1e Wireless Xing Ci y Site P 48 h$ite p Facility square feet. 7C) Page 3 c. Shared outdoor recreation space shall be readily observable to promote crime prevention and safety; Response: The criteria do not apply to the proposed development. 8. Where landfill and/or development is allowed within and adjacent to the 100-year floodplain, the City shall require consideration of the dedication of sufficient open land area for greenway adjoining and within the floodplain. This area shall include portions at a suitable elevation for the construction of a pedestrian/bicycle pathway within the floodplain in accordance with the adopted pedestrian/bicycle plan. Response: The criteria do not apply to the proposed development. 9. Demarcation of public, semi-public and private spaces for crime prevention: a. The structures and site improvements shall be designed so that public areas such as streets or public gathering places, semi-public areas and private outdoor areas are clearly defined to establish persons having a right to be in the space, to provide for crime prevention and to establish maintenance responsibility; and b. These areas may be defined by,but not limited to: (1) A deck, patio, low wall,hedge,or draping vine; (2) A trellis or arbor; (3)A change in elevation or grade; (4) A change in the texture of the path material; (5) Sign; or (6) Landscaping. Response: The criteria do not apply to the proposed development. 10. Crime prevention and safety: a. Windows shall be located so that areas vulnerable to crime can be surveyed by the occupants; b. Interior laundry and service areas shall be located in a way that they can be observed by others; c. Mail boxes shall be located in lighted areas having vehicular or pedestrian traffic; d. The exterior lighting levels shall be selected and the angles shall be oriented towards areas vulnerable to crime; and e. Light fixtures shall be provided in areas having heavy pedestrian or vehicular traffic and in potentially dangerous areas such as parking lots, stairs,ramps and abrupt grade changes. Fixtures shall be placed at a height so that light patterns overlap at a height of seven feet which is sufficient to illuminate a person. Response: The criteria do not apply to the proposed development. 11. Public transit: a. Provisions within the plan shall be included for providing for transit if the development proposal is adjacent to or within 500 feet of existing or proposed transit route; b. The requirements for transit facilities shall be based on: (1)The location of other transit facilities in the area; and Radio Frequency Transmission Facility (T-Mobile Wireless King City Site PO-4037C) Page 4 (2) The size and type of the proposal. c. The following facilities may be required after City and Tri-Met review: (1) Bus stop shelters; (2) Turnouts for buses; and (3) Connecting paths to the shelters. Response: The criteria do not apply to the proposed development. 12. Landscaping: a. All landscaping shall be designed in accordance with the requirements set forth in Chapter 18.745; b. In addition to the open space and recreation area requirements of subsections 5 and 6 above, a minimum of 20 percent of the gross area including parking, loading and service areas shall be landscaped; and c. A minimum of 15 percent of the gross site area shall be landscaped. Response: A total of 4 new Vine Maples and 30 Rhododendrons will surround the 15' X 20' lease area containing the ground equipment and new pole. The proposed landscape will meet screening and buffering and coverage requirements of the criteria. 13. Drainage: All drainage plans shall be designed in accordance with the criteria in the adopted 1981 master drainage plan; Response: The drainage of the site will not be changed by the proposed development. 14. Provision for the disabled: All facilities for the disabled shall be designed in accordance with the requirements set forth in ORS Chapter 447; and Response: The criteria do not apply to the proposed development. 15. All of the provisions and regulations of the underlying zone shall apply unless modified by other sections or this title, e.g., Planned Developments, Chapter 18.350; or a variance or adjustment granted under Chapter 18.370. Response: The proposed development meets all the regulations of the underlying General Commercial zoning district. STREET AND UTILITY IMPROVEMENT STANDARDS 18.810.020 General Provisions A. When standards apply. Unless otherwise provided, construction,reconstruction or repair of streets, sidewalks, curbs and other public improvements shall occur in accordance with the standards of this title.No development may occur and no land use application may be approved Radio Frequency Transmission Facility (T-Mobile Wireless King City Site PO-4037C) Page 5 unless the public facilities related to development comply with the public facility requirements established in this section and adequate public facilities are available.Applicants may be required to dedicate land and build required public improvements only when the required exaction is directly related to and roughly proportional to the impact of the development. Response: The proposed development is an unmanned wireless facility which will require neither water nor sewer service. After the site is built,there will be approximately one trip to the site a month by a wireless technician. Due to the minimal impact of this development no public street or utility improvement should be required. WIRELESS DEVELOPMENT STANDARDS 18.798.050 Uses Permitted Subject to Site Development Review A. Uses permitted. The Director shall review the uses subject to Site Development Review,as regulated by Chapter 18.360, using approval criteria contained in Section B below. The following uses are subject to approval under this section: 1. Towers in commercial zones and the I-P zone. A tower,including antennas, other support equipment and/or accessory equipment buildings, in any commercial or I-P district,provided that such a tower shall be set back from any existing off-site residence by a distance equal to the height of the tower. Response: The proposed tower is located in a commercial zone (CG). The pole is set back from all off-site residences by over 100',which is the height of the proposed pole. B. Review criteria. Any use subject to Site Development Review per Section A above, shall be evaluated using the following standards: 1. Aesthetic: a. New towers shall maintain a non-reflective grey finish or, if required by the FAA, be painted pursuant to the FAA's requirements. Response: The proposed pole will be a non reflective, galvanize, grey finish unless it is required to be painted pursuant to FAA requirements. 2. Setbacks: a. Towers designed to collapse within themselves shall be set back in accordance with the setbacks contained in the base zone. Response: The proposed tower is designed to collapse within itself. It is set back in accordance with the underlying GC zone. Radio Frequency Transmission Facility (T-Mobile Wireless King City Site PO-4037C) Page 6 3. Tower spacing: No new tower shall be allowed within 500 feet of an existing tower. If,having completed the collocation protocol outlined in Section 18.798.080 without success,the provider will be required to build a tower less than 500 feet from an existing tower, it will be required to obtain a Type I adjustment governed by 18.370.020 C8b. Response: The proposed tower is not within 500 feet of an existing tower. 4. Tower height: No tower shall exceed 100 feet for a single user or 125 for multiple users. Response: The height of the proposed pole is 100 feet. 5. Lighting: No lighting shall be permitted on a tower except as required by the FAA. Response: No lighting will be placed on the tower unless required by the FAA 6. Fencing and security: For security purposes, towers and ancillary facilities shall be enclosed by a minimum six-foot fence. Response: The drawings show that the facility will be surrounded by a 6' tall wood fence. 7. Landscaping and screening: a. Landscaping shall be placed outside the fence and shall consist of evergreen shrubs which reach six feet in height and 95%opacity within three years of planting. Response: The drawings show the required landscaping. b. When adjacent to or within residentially-zoned property, free-standing towers and accessory equipment facilities shall be screened by the planting of a minimum of four evergreen trees at least 15 feet in height at the time of planting. The planting of said trees shall be prescribed in number by a plan prepared by a registered arborist in locations that(1)most effectively screen the wireless facilities from residential uses and (2)promote the future survival of the trees while limiting adverse effects of the trees on abutting properties.Existing evergreen trees at least 15 feet in height may be used to meet the screening requirement of this section if the arborist demonstrates that they provide screening for abutting residential uses. Response: The proposed tower is adjacent to residentially zoned property. The landscape drawings indicate 4 new vine maple trees will be planted around the lease area. 8. Noise: Noise-generating equipment shall be sound-buffered by means of baffling,barriers or other suitable means to reduce the sound level measured at the property line to 50 dBA (day)/40 dBA (night)when adjacent to a noise-sensitive land use and 75 dBA (day)/60 dBA(night)when adjacent to other uses. Radio Frequency Transmission Facility (T-Mobile Wireless King City Site PO-4037C) Page 7 Response: A noise study is included with this application that shows the dBA standards will be met. C. Other requirements. At the time a provider requests a building permit, it must demonstrate compliance to all applicable state and federal regulations,including, but not limited to,the Oregon Uniform Structural and Building Codes and FAA. Response: The required information will be supplied when T-Mobile applies for a building permit. GENERAL COMMERCIAL STANDARDS The proposed development meets all the commercial development standards shown in Table 18.520.2 of the Tigard Municipal code except for the maximum height of 45 feet. The proposed tower will be 100 feet in height,which is allowed by 18.798.050 of the Tigard Municipal Code. Conclusion The proposed new wireless facility on this property meets the wireless development standards of chapter 18.798 of the Tigard Municipal Code as well as the commercial development standards chapter 18.520 and the Site Development Review standards in chapter 18.360 of the code. Radio Frequency Transmission Facility (T-Mobile Wireless King City Site PO-4037C) Page 8 I) 1Z� °3 CI -4 SIGN IN: NAME: ADDRESS: K4-u 4 dot L v 3 5 s,th C- l Lc v 2 ( SA /<4 Le 4 AJ 3 l C f-t N1 p tC, ti QUe M tc A 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 21 23 24 25 • T-Mobile King City Site-Neighborhood Meeting Minutes 11/24/03 This meeting was attended by only 2 neighbors of the proposed site,and a representative of the Masonic Temple. The primary issue of concern to the 2 neighbors was the appearance and height of the proposed monopole. After reviewing photos and drawings of the proposed site,the neighbors did not seem to have a concern with the visual impact. Teresa Kaufman wanted to know whether T-Mobile planned on placing lights on the pole to light the parking area of the lodge. She had concerns about the area behind the lodge being unsafe after dark. We informed her that at this time we had plans to place lighting on the pole. The meeting ended at approximately 8:30 pm when no further neighbors appeared for the meeting. Welkin Engineering, P.C. December 23, 2003 JO: 03-151.04 P0-4037-C Torn Ginsbach Northwest Geotecb, Inc. 9120 SW Pioneer Court, Suite B Wilsonville,Oregon 97070 RE: KING CITY T-MOBILE CELL TOWER SIGHT DISTANCE Dear Tom: A site analysis was recently performed at 13680 SW Pacific Highway,to establish existing sight distance from the egress of the properties'proposed cell tower. The reference for the study was a point 15'behind the fog line of SW Pacific Highway at an existing driveway that will be used to service the tower, and 3.5'high to any object in the travel lane. The posted speed limit is 35 mph. According to ODOT, a minimum of 600'of clear sight distance should be available for egress onto SW Pacific Highway, Sighting from the driveway to the west showed clear sight distance of greater than 600 feet to the signalized intersection at SW Gaarde St/SW McDonald St. Sighting to the east from the driveway showed clear sight distance of greater than 600'. Based upon our analysis,the current sight distance from the proposed T-Mobile access driveway is more than adequate in each direction. Existing shrubbery near the driveway may obscure the visual clearance area, as defined in the City of Tigard Development Code, Section 18.795.040,but it doesn't interfere with the sight distance as described, and can be maintained to conform to the visual clearance area requirement. Should you have any questions, please call me at(503) 598-1866. Sincerely, WELKIN EN E' ► ,P.C. Ed Christensen, P.E. 16.166 Principal. OR�D cc: file f Xyce.-��31�5 \\\\\ ` :,` `U' o� 111\ �o� 1 J, � �/ `11 , a 1,, iii ,/r `„..h///.b' 1; i ._ 1\ ' ./ 2 1 111111' �%4\ `1\ y`\ / / � p4 f „C' , / ,C6li Id.047,00 T • \ dd I/ .j / ' I • , : / ,/ / , / 11\ 11 , •a / / ;1111 l . / /9`i I r C` //cam 'r/ g ' /�g�� \ r , / J 7 Ca '-v / 1 I //y.' ,i '11141-N." ')--, / N./,:d .. . Ste:., , k.. .,� a N ys ra �1 11,1 1g' �My 0 Ce• / x te yy illi Ql. /.51 P i C 1�1•J J ^,V J L. _._ C -CA N,;, . 19 February 200.. . .s -1-:- F:r== Project: Voice Stream PO 1953D Stoller Farms ; ';72,-/-: CSAE Project No.. 02-10 - -- : _?'227..1-.3.2 Procurement#: PRO 13102-01 4 Mr. Dave Fisher Voice Stream 1500 NE Irving Suite#530 Portland,OR 97232 Subject: Environment Noise Review of the Proposed Cellular Transceiver Station (Stoller Farms Site) Installation Located on Laidlaw Road near West Union Road, Beaverton,OR. Dear Mr. Fisher, Introduction... Per your request an evaluation of an existing cellular transceiver site was conducted on 13 February 2002 to document noise levels at a reference distance of 6 inches from the discharge grilles at the existing Murray and Highway 26th Spectra Site for use in predicting noise levels at the proposed Stoller Farms site and to confirm compliance with the Department of Environmental Quality State of Oregon Noise Control Regulations. The noise source is a typical 3-bay transceiver unit mounted on a concrete housekeeping pad on grade, and with intake and exhaust louvers. Measured and Predicted Noise Data... The Table below lists octave band and overall noise levels for existing equipment at the Murray site, the measured existing neighborhood ambient noise at the Stoller Farms site adjacent noise sensitive property including local vehicles parking in the adjacent parking lot and traffic on Laidlaw Road and the prediction of noise for the new installation. a f ' is t 7 .` E :1r I! <T C r is _ ,� V� / , \ Stoller Farms Site Murray Road Site Murray Road Site Mr. Dave Fisher • VoiceStream Stoller Farms Site Environmental Noise Review 19 February 2002 Page 2 Octave Band Sound Pressure Levels-Table I 13 February 2002... Description dBA....31 63 125....250....500....1,000...2,000...4,000...Hertz Murray/26th Spectra Site with cooling at 6 inches from louvers..Lmax .. 65 64 67 68 66 65 56 50 45 dBSPL Ambient Noise at this site..Leq... 53 62 67 63 56 50 49 43 35 dBSPL The ambient noise at this site has effected the 31, 63,and 125 Hertz octave bands with the resulting adjusted noise levels used in predicting noise at the Stoller Farms site. Corrected noise levels ..Lmax... 65 60 64 66 66 65 56 50 45 dBSPL The Stoller Farms Site. Existing ambient noise levels: Leq 60 56 62 59 57 49 45 44 47 dB SPL L10 53 51 57 49 42 38 38 37 36 dB SPL L50 43 46 49 47 39 32 32 28 27 dB SPL L99 36 39 42.5 45 36 30 29 22 16 dB SPL. The predicted noise levels at the closest residential property line or 30 feet from the discharge/intake grilles 30 25 29 31 31 30 21 15 5 dBSPL Department of Environmental Quality Noise Regulations...and the predicted CEL site noise levels... Current noise regulations require that noise levels not to exceed the following steady state octave band noise Levels from 10 p.m.to 7 a.m. At the closest residential property line or 30 feet from the intake/discharge louvers. Description dBA....31 63 125....250....500....1,000...2,000...4,000...Hertz DEQ Noise Regulations 65....62 56 50 46 43 40 37... dBSPL Stoller Farms predicted noise 30....25 29 31 31 30 21 15... dBSPL at 30 feet from the CEL system at adjacent noise sensitive property lines. Mr. Dave Fisher Voice Stream Stoller Farms r • Environmental Noise Review 18 February 2002 Page 3 Noise Impact Predictions at the Closest Residential Property Line... Considering line-of-sight noise propagation the cellular transceiver site is exceptionally quiet. The noise is at or below the existing ambient noise (L99) at the adjacent property line or 30 feet from the CEL system. The Stoller Farms CEL site does not exceed DEO Noise Regulations. The existing ambient neighborhood noise level will not be increased. Since I , Cliff N) a, P.E. Principal IE ENGINEERED �� ENDEAVORS f �, INCORPORATED ��'' Th•E.grriwre.d Pwvi elf VioW dr'TIry�� YEL9Ep December 19, 2003 Dave Fisher T-Mobile 1500 N.F. Trving Portland, OR 97232 Reference: Design and Reliability of 10Uit (4) Carrier Flagpole Location: Tigard, Washington County, OR Initial Failure Point at 67 ft Elevation Quality of Steel and Fabrication of a Monopole Structure EEI Numbcr: 12215 Site Name- King City/PO4037-C In response to your inquiry regarding the design and anticipated reliability of a 100 ft monopole structure, EEI would like to offer the toliowing comments: 1 . The monopole structure is designed to meet the requirements of the ANSI TIA/EIA 2L2F (June, 1996)titled Structural Standards for Steel Antenna lowers and Antenna Supporting Structures. It also meets or exceeds the requirements of The International Building Code (IBC), and the Manual of Steel Construction AO Mnth edition by the American Institute of Steel Construction. Furthermore, the foundation and anchor bolts meet the requirements of the American Concrete Institute's Building Code Requirements for Structural Concrete (ACI 316-99). The pole itself is also designed to meet the provisions of the American Society of Civil Engineers(A.S.C.k.)Design of Steel Tiunsinission Pole Sltuctures, which was originally published in 1973 and most recently updated in 1990 7 Based on the location of this structure and the applicable design codes, the basic design wind speed is 80 MPH(fastest mile wind)and 100 MPH(3-second gust wind)with no ice. An additional case with ice is also checked, which is 69 MITI fastest mile wind speed and �/x in of radial ice, applied simultaneously. The 80 MPH(fastest mile) and 100 MPH(3- second gust)exceed the 50-year maximum anticipated wind velocity at 33 ft above ground level. Additional factuis are applied to increase the wind loading, e.g., a 1.69 gust response factor is imposed on the fastest mile wind speed in order to account fur sudden changes in wind speed, a height coefficient to accnunr fur increasing wind speed with height, and an exposure coefficient. Based on these conservative coefficients,the structure could in fact survive even greater wind loads than the basic design wind speed without any 7610 Jruther Drive Engineered Endeavors,Inc. Mentor, OH 44060 g Phone(440)918-1101 • Fax(440)918-1108 100 'd iHii-8T6-041H,L SAII,Vti1S1N1MY 1H3 6I :E1 (11Hil b0 ;80- W 31 I SOW—,L Reference: Design and Reliability of 100 ft(4) Carrier Flagpole in Tigard, OR Initial Fulurr. Point at 67 ft Elevation EEI Number: 12215 Site Name: King City/P04037-C failures. 3. Thc monopole structure design is controlled by wind induced loads,however, earthquake induced loads are also evaluated with all building code requirements being satisfied_ Vertical loads(i.e., gravity loads) are minimal ctn these types of structures, approximately 7.0% of the maximum capacity. 4. The design and loading assumptions, which are used for the analysis of these slruclui es. are very conservative in nature when tannpated to other building codes, as a result, structural failure is highly improbable. 5. Failure of a steel monopole structure is defined as being that point at which the induced stresses exceed the yield strength of the maw'ial. At this point,deflections will be induced in the structurc. which will no Longer be recoverable once the load has been iet»ovcd. Hence, a permanent deflection in the monopole would exist. 6. The induced loads must be sustained for a long enough period in order that the structure has time to respond to the load without its removal. Monopoles are flexible, forgiving structures, which are not generally susceptible to damage by impact loads such as wind gust um earthquake shocks. 7_ As the structure leans over from the induced loads, it presents a markedly reduced exposure area for the development of wind-induced forces. This would result in the luweiing of the applied forces and, therefore, the reduction of Stresses and a halting of the structural deflection. 8. Hypothetically, let's assume that a pole becomes overloaded. The typical consequence of this overloading is "local buckling" where a relatively small portion of the shaft distorts and "kinks" the steel. Upon the removal of the applied load, the structure will not rentrn to a plumb position. This does not cause a free falling pole. Even though the buckle exists, the cross section of the pule is cable of carrying the entire vertical load. As a result, wind induced loads could not conceivably bring this type of structure to the ground due to the excellent ductile properties, design criteria, and failure mode. 9. 'thus monopoles is designed to collapse upon itself in the event that a catastrophic circumstance arises, however this type of failure has never occurred on an EEI tapered tubular monopole structure. Thc initial failure point of the monopole is at the G7 ft elevation. The structure was designed so dial the stresses in the upper section of monopole are greater than the stresses in the bottom sections_ The upper section fails and collapses onto the bottom section producing significantly less wind area,hence decreasing the loads applied to the structure. As a result, the structure does not free fall" to the ground. 7610 Jcnther Drive Engineered Endeavors,Inc. Mentor,01-1 44060 Phone(410)918•I 101 • Fax(440)918-1108 NO 'd tOII-8I6-014: 13J, 391lffiS1NIWOV 199 6I;£I (tOH1) 1/0 80- 'N'Pr 31 l How-,L Reference: Design and Reliability of 100.ft(4) Flagpo le in Tigard, OR lnirial point at 67f Elevation gEl Number: 11115 Site Name: King City/1'04017-C 10.Further proof to the integrity of these structure-types are the fact that all EEI monopole structures in the Florida region withstood the direct impact of Hurricane Andrew with absolutely no structural damage reported. Wind loading was reported to be in the range of 100-120 MPH. Most recently, all EEI monopoles in the Wilmington. NC legion withstood the force of Hurricanes Bertha and Fran, which had wind speeds of 1U5 MPH and wind gusts of 115 MPH. 11.In another incident, an EEI monopole withstood the impact of a run away bulldozer, which rammed the monopole at the base. The monopole stood firm with only a dent in the shaft. After field repairs, this monopole is still in service and performing to its design capacity. 12.EEI has never experienced a structural failure due to wcalltcr induced overloading. EEI personnel have over 75 years combined experience in design and fabrication of these types of structures. In response to your inquiry regarding the quality of sled.and fabrication of a monopole structure: 1) The monopole is fabricated from ASTM A572 Grade 65 material with a controlled silicon content of 0.06% maximum to promote a uniform galvanized coating. The base plate material is fabricated flora A572mod Grade 60 material. All plate material meets a Charpy V Notch toughness requirement of 15 ft-1hc Fahrenheit. By meeting the strict toughness requirement, the monopole is best suited to resist the cyclic/fatigue type loading (i.e., wind induced loading) these structures exhibit Monopoles made of pipe sections or other types of steel do not meet these rigorous requirements. '1'he toughness specification is based on 35 years of taper tubular poles being designed and manufactured for the electrical transmission and communication industries. 2) Anchor bolts are fabricated from A615 Grade 75 material. The bolts are 2 %a in diameter, matte from 1118J bar stock. All threads are rolled. Anchor bolts come complete with two (2) A194 Grade 2H hex nuts. The anchor hull material must also meet a Charpy V-Notch toughness of 15 ft-lbs @-20°Fahrenheit, to resist the cyclic/fatigue type loading (i.e., wind induced loading) these strm:Lutes exhibit. EEI guarantees the quality of steel used on the entire monopole. Material Certifications (Mill Test Reports) are available on all material at the time of fabrication. The toughness requirement should be taken very seriously, for over the lifetime of We sttucturc not having this toughness requirement, "toe" cracks may occur at the base of the structure and the structure could ultimately fail. 7610 Jelilltel Drive Engineered Endeavors, Inc. Mentor.UH 44060 Phone(440)918-1101 • Fax('140)918-11014 £00 'd ZOII-8T6-01/1/ 131 3AlIVEIS1N11 0d 193 0Z;£I 0111) 1/0 10- 'NV 31 I tEW—,L Reference: Design and Reliability of loop(4) Ca Licr Flagpotc in Tigard, OR Initial Failure Point at 67 ft Elevation EEI Number: 112l5 Site Nauc. King City/PO4037 C Fabrication of the monopole is performed in accordance with the provisions of the AISC Manual of Steel Construction and ASCE's Design of Steel Transmission role Structures. All welding and inspection is in accordance with the American Welding Society's Specification D1.1 latest revision. Testing and inspection reports arc available upon request at the time of fabrication. EEI's monopole fabricator has an important certification as a quality fabricator AISC (American Institute of Steel Construction. Inc.) Conventional Steel Structure Certification In conclusion, due to the aforementioned items, 1r1;I's monopole structures never experienced a "free fall" type failure due in wind ur seismic induced loads. 1 hope that these comments address the issues, which you might encounter relative to the anticipated performance of monopole structures and quality of steel and fabrication. However,I will be most happy to answer any specific questions, which you might have. Sincerely, Engineered Endeavors, Inc_ Michael R. Motel, P.E. Vice President of Engineering 7610 Jcnthcr Drive Engineered Endeavors, Inc. Mentor,01-1 44060 Phonc(440)918-1101 • Fax(4atl)918-1108 100 'd Z011-816-0W 131 131 391J,bHISIN!} QV 133 OC:iI (i1H,L) li0 10- 'Or HI I SOW—,L • • • • • r•F • •mob l e • T-Mobile King City PO-4037C-Impact Study 18.390.040 of the Tigard Municipal Code requires an Impact Study for Type II Site Development Reviews. Impact to the following public facilities and services need to be addressed in this study: Transportation The proposed development will have no impact on the transportation system. The proposed wireless facility will be unmanned.After construction of the site is complete,the facility will be visited approximately one a month by a wireless technician in a private utility vehicle. Drainage The drainage on system on this property will not change as a result of this development. The impervious area will on this property will not increase or decrease. The leased area and new landscaping will be located where there is existing landscaping on the west side of the building. Some existing impervious area will be removed and replaced by landscaping and some existing landscape area will be covered with water permeable gravel. Water and Sewer The City water and sewer services will not be impacted by this development.The facility required neither water nor sewer services. Noise Impacts The proposed development will create no noise impacts. The new equipment cabinets used have no noise generating equipment of any kind. 1500 NE Irving St Portland,OR 97232 e. V �,r ` *' W / A L F S S '1. a� 1500 N.E.Irving St.Suite 530 E Portland,Oregon 97232 Phone: 503-810-0040 `\ Fax:503-232-0519 }' KING CITY P0-4037-C 13680 SW PACIFIC HIGHWAY TIGARD, OREGON , a „„,,,,/ Tigard O PROPOSED ANTENNA W C''1 0 LOCATION Q ■ LEGEND = O tttrill --- CITY OF TIGARD M I HIGHWAY 1 z.i = ARTERIAL STREET m I Z [---- - Z r 1 STREET Gw Mrs..- 0 PHOTO LOCATION A 111?-.■ L . PROPOSED MONOPOLE LOCATION ` P I—I J S I M U 1—AT I O N I_ F? MAP NOT TO SCALE thiceSQmm flit . - 1500 N.E. Irving St.Suite 530 ~ KING CITY Portland,Oregon 97232 , - ,�.,y�'s, Phone:503-810-0040 Fax:503-232-0519 PO-4037-C 13680 SW PACIFIC HIGHWAY TIGARD, OREGON PROPOSED EXISTING PROPOSED ANTENNA ,�. LOCATION "�! b PHOTO • _ •' ° ; . . '.SCI A LATI.ON - 'EXHIBIT- . . I • Y , 110 - 0.±. 100'-0" TALL _ _ STEEL MONOPOLE - VIEW FROM THE WEST-SW WATKINS AVENUE- 245'TO SITE 01C181111: I R 1 E .5 5 1500 N.E.Irving St.Suite 530 • KING CITY hone:Portland,Oregon 3-810 97232 Phone:503-810-0040 ,, Fax: 503-232-0519 .. PO-4037—C • *� • `' 13680 SW PACIFIC HIGHWAY t TIGARD, OREGON ?. -,,. . 40' _ , if _,,.- a!; PROPOSECa EX1ST1 NG PHOTO PROPOSED ANTENNA SIMULATION LOCATION P/EXHIBIT • CO , ...J.J w4 MTh[- , .f - ' -4IV y fir- cRT�✓1�', - , A t- W ';F:.--,..41— . . _ .4"',.`tyr .,...1 . , , , 100'-0" TALL _. ., ;,, r - . .- STEEL MONOPOLE " �._�.;..w �„� _ a `= - �- 1 . - - — VIEW FROM THE NORTH-SHOPPING CENTER PARKING AREA-320'TO SITE i'r 4r t*,'. l'} , • . r. J + , Celli: 1�M w ,, }� 1500 N.E. Irving St.Suite 530 1a •• ?'rte,14.0 3' ' ,• KING CITY Portland,Oregon 97232 Phone 503-810-0040 Fax:503-232-0519 4 taw PO-4037-C ,. - ? ' 41`�` 13680 SW PACIFIC HIGHWAY •, ,r,"" ' - TIGARD, OREGON Sit J it U F?0 POSE1E> EXI STI NQ " ."•1', PR©P,OS 'DA TEN NA% ., ,, �' ,. , ' _oC:,'4o r` f . ' • ,s . f � ,,'.. l7� V I ' ,r ,.w r , r . , � r . e I a r r •' ' � 1 •5 r )• �/ r - ; { ` y 1 rl a I. %,''''.; - i r'ir- t c. .. .EXHIBIT I -7. _ 0 t' , . ..:,. . ,==:-,--;,-„. , •AN/'lb..* t., 0:4401It . .001010. Vi ice ` ,,•i r s_ 1. I, I I I K=- 5" N 100_0" TALL •.r7 * :. l En STEEL MONOPOLE - .. _ I VIEW FROM THE NORTH -SW HILL VIEW STREET-259''IQ SITE „, ;x; .„,,: ..,,t1,...._a•. ,,,,..,'/., "s.::....:: ,,ii.1,,.ev,”. ,i,, OCIPSIR LESS 1500 N.E.Irving St.Suite 530 ;Ale „"` .,.�"4'''.'' �, fir` r.; c r Portland,Oregon 97232 - � - `1.• KING CITY Phone:503-810-0040 �^' �' r '' � ., �'��' Fax:503-232-0519 `� ti '< P0-4037—C r;,.� t —_ ,"It ue f r � 13680 SW PACIFIC HIGHWAY lam' ' s 1 •> •.r .4. 4.tr4 d TIGARD, OREGON i II "s v •., t ' PRO POSE EK1ST1NG ' ' A PROPOSED ANTENNA r ' LOCATION PHOTO o �k t 1. l'` f A,; �jj a SIMULATION / .�. ,� r 4. . ,.; �� s ��. J..� f'..'� 1F ,�, ice 0. ?t EXHIBIT � 5.12. . r L� M' •. - �! ; ii a y 1$'t { t i q : fier � * ty as �' •(. '.,.� ! s4'. . 'N♦ 4 �4.JE 4 ' i r J1 . , C ` i rY�,( { 1-_• �tt Pte, - `100 0 TALL 1 ' , t _, a:1 % - q T � STEEL MONOPOLE N — . :. .�; .. ' .- & _ r ' ,. i ,k9 \ VIEW FROM THE EAST-SW 100th AVENUE- 825'TO SITE A Y , -1 VoiceStr "i 1.x 1 " 1500 N.E. Irving St.Suite 530 +,. .� . Portland,Oregon 97232 4�, F * KING CITY Phone:503-810-0040 • • Fax:503-232-0519 , w{ F PO-4037—C �, .4' i >- - 13680 SW PACIFIC HIGHWAY _. TIGARD, OREGON if - PROPOSED illik.,:44..' ' 4' 4ef ar" ab. ti.. , PHOTO . e M. y f SIMULATION "vti PROPOSED ANTENNA '` ' EXHIBIT - .0:: LOCATION e ' ,`#� i �� .. `+ c ,�. ' - µ . `0,,, S [ V∎ '}sR 4 .. \tip � t - ,i i', ♦..-i f° 4,1 -. ,� —.-ammo 100'_0, TALL _ STEEL MONOPOLE s -" VIEW FROM THE EAST-SW STEVENS COURT-856'TO SITE (.--; PHOTO • ' • - - - ' 16 -------. ° \-1....- 1 SIMULATION KING CITY I, - WIR LESS ' 13680 SW PACIFIC HIGHWAY Portland,Oregon 97232 gm 1 i 1 Irk 11111r. Frryk, Tr. . 1 l S. AV\ . 1 • "T. tr •- ......Sup AI. AV • _ - •, s �♦ j ,M- . 1a PHOTO KING CITY --, 0 SIMULATION ��11 w I R EXHIBIT PO-4037-C 1500 N.E.Irving St.Suite 530 tt13680 SW PACIFIC HIGHWAY Portland,Oregon 97232 _ �4 VIEW FROM THE PROPOSED ' w, TIGARD, OREGON Phone:503-810-0040 Fax:503-232-0519 - ,, SITE LOOKING NORTH :' i► F X ■ S T ■ N G '� 4.. ►; CONDITIONS . tys:. ',. .. 5!-- . ' .1 A • 111!!! F 'I �..F iI + . R ...Ili), �i J.L i ` d'.1•' �� fr ��. - + 4.om. _ �c t Ii44,TP, tits 11) . , - li • 1 7 de"-- .ilk' 1 A `l �`ti T ■ �il i 4. .. _ ,,=•.''' 1)' 4 ` air :h ' f ' M� . •- f . . ` . •i. `fir t A a"�R�"/K1 . 4L � r . . 56 •mr,x.„.1 Os. ,., n�yy Y i. .4 it .it PHOTO KING CITY ` � - m 8 SIMULATION " . . w� a s EXHIBIT " PO-4037-C l� f': . - 1 1500 N.E. Irving St.Suite 530 13680 SW PACIFIC HIGHWAY i, s Portland,Oregon 97232 1.: VIEW FROM THE PROPOSED ' TIGARD,OREGON Phone:503-810-0040 R• 1 Fax:503-232-0519 SITE LOOKING EAST 1 ,. ., ¢ ,,, - - CON 0 IONS � yi' •fl ', : tix'filk' ''' :::rt` <�`' y lt.•.. y" rr ; r lifl . -4 77 : 5- .. ! T'j, 1 - 1 •'. . 4141 i 'C: +,_s tid •' • • • Sy •� 'I••!*`' `.' At t�`1 '• it` PHOTO �••; , f. 9 SIMULATION �` '''y. , KING CITY VoiceStram.1,,. � _. '. EXHIBIT A.-,,,+ � ' PO-4037—C Y 1500 N.E.Irving St.Suite 530 '.v.' I. r 13680 SW PACIFIC HIGHWAY Portland,Oregon 97232 • • c 'oi, ' Phone:503-810-0040 VIEW FROM THE PROPOSED ,k,.,• ,, TIGARD, OREGON Fax:503-232-0519 SITE LOOKING SOUTH •:..1 ,t ',It EX ■ ST II N G e `i " IN CONDITIONS ''' " A." } tit � � ,o., `y •s r T ':' 14}��,t _. � 9 "4• Aff.,,A....,igia ,.• - -per^'? 11`�t. „ • �M h. •7, "d.iJ ''' ...i f. <-I*ic ,it ,�. '• • tf• .1. ,i ' '.0 a /� 14`•.•. i+ i \ '' ) ` yam. ,ft. .r. - ;, . 1,;rte IM . A' �h • :� 4 4 �i`` :Y . 1 .' i• • i • '• • 1,.5 f / 1 / :t"..,., _',. Y• ._- a — .•a -� •. -- •.wow. 5fru c•+ure os C Fuyico,th'ø &i Desuyi■ Qcdcu (z4iovis ENGINEERED EE ENDEAVORS C INCORPORATED EMERSON... The Experienced Point of View Network rower • RECEWE JAN 2 0 Tw c(y¢TIGA'n'`' 1f�lG �QINEE� PLM's ENGINEERED ENDEAVORS INCORPORATED 7610 Jenther Drive • Mentor, Ohio 44060 Telephone: (440) 918-1101 • Telefax: (440) 91B-1108 T Mobile Structure & Foundation Design Calculations 100' Pole Site: King City/PO4037-C EEI Job #: 12215-E01 EEI ,„. ENGINEERED (44, 'ENDEAVORS INCORPORATED ] • ,�` The Experienced Point of View ACTIVE MEMBER December 19, 2003 Dave Fisher T-Mobile 1500 N.E. Irving Portland, OR 97232 Reference: Design and Reliability of 100 ft (4) Carrier Flagpole Location: Tigard, Washington County, OR Initial Failure Point at 67 ft Elevation Quality of Steel and Fabrication of a Monopole Structure EEI Number: 12215 Site Name: King City/P04037-C In response to your inquiry regarding the design and anticipated reliability of a 100 ft monopole structure, EEI would like to offer the following comments: 1. The monopole structure is designed to meet the requirements of the ANSI TIA/EIA 222F (June, 1996) titled Structural Standards for Steel Antenna Towers and Antenna Supporting Structures. It also meets or exceeds the requirements of The International Building Code (IBC), and the Manual of Steel Construction ASD Ninth Edition by the American Institute of Steel Construction. Furthermore, the foundation and anchor bolts meet the requirements of the American Concrete Institute's Building Code Requirements for Structural Concrete (ACI 318-99). The pole itself is also designed to meet the provisions of the American Society of Civil Engineers (A.S.C.E.)Design of Steel Transmission Pole Structures, which was originally published in 1973 and most recently updated in 1990. 2. Based on the location of this structure and the applicable design codes, the basic design wind speed is 80 MPH(fastest mile wind) and 100 MPH(3-second gust wind) with no ice. An additional case with ice is also checked, which is 69 MPH fastest mile wind speed and I in of radial ice, applied simultaneously. The 80 MPH(fastest mile) and 100 MPH(3- second gust) exceed the 50-year maximum anticipated wind velocity at 33 ft above ground level. Additional factors are applied to increase the wind loading, e.g., a 1.69 gust response factor is imposed on the fastest mile wind speed in order to account for sudden changes in wind speed, a height coefficient to account for increasing wind speed with height, and an exposure coefficient. Based on these conservative coefficients, the structure could in fact survive even greater wind loads than the basic design wind speed without any 7610 Jenther Drive Engineered Endeavors, Inc. Mentor, OH 44060 Phone(440)918-1101 • Fax(440)918-1108 Reference: Design and Reliability of 100 ft(4)Carrier Flagpole in Tigard, oR Initial Failure Point at 67 ft Elevation EEI Number: 12215 Site Name: King City/PO4037-C failures. 3. The monopole structure design is controlled by wind induced loads, however, earthquake induced loads are also evaluated with all building code requirements being satisfied. Vertical loads(i.e., gravity loads)are minimal on these types of structures, approximately 20% of the maximum capacity. 4. The design and loading assumptions, which are used for the analysis of these structures, are very conservative in nature when compared to other building codes, as a result, structural failure is highly improbable. 5. Failure of a steel monopole structure is defined as being that point at which the induced stresses exceed the yield strength of the material. At this point, deflections will be induced in the structure, which will no longer be recoverable once the load has been removed. Hence, a permanent deflection in the monopole would exist. 6. The induced loads must be sustained for a long enough period in order that the structure has time to respond to the load without its removal. Monopoles are flexible, forgiving structures, which are not generally susceptible to damage by impact loads such as wind gust or earthquake shocks. 7. As the structure leans over from the induced loads, it presents a markedly reduced exposure area for the development of wind-induced forces. This would result in the lowering of the applied forces and, therefore, the reduction of stresses and a halting of the structural deflection. 8. Hypothetically, let's assume that a pole becomes overloaded. The typical consequence of this overloading is "local buckling" where a relatively small portion of the shaft distorts and "kinks" the steel. Upon the removal of the applied load, the structure will not return to a plumb position. This does not cause a free falling pole. Even though the buckle exists, the cross section of the pole is cable of carrying the entire vertical load. As a result, wind induced loads could not conceivably bring this type of structure to the ground due to the excellent ductile properties, design criteria, and failure mode. 9. This monopoles is designed to collapse upon itself in the event that a catastrophic circumstance arises, however this type of failure has never occurred on an EEI tapered tubular monopole structure. The initial failure point of the monopole is at the 67 ft elevation. The structure was designed so that the stresses in the upper section of monopole are greater than the stresses in the bottom sections. The upper section fails and collapses onto the bottom section producing significantly less wind area, hence decreasing the loads applied to the structure. As a result, the structure does not "free fall" to the ground. 7610 Jenther Drive Engineered Endeavors, Inc. Mentor,OH 44060 Phone(440)918-1101 • Fax(440)918-1108 Reference: Design and,...viability of 100 ft(4)Carrier Flagpole in Tigar.., JR Initial Failure Point at 67 ft Elevation EEI Number: 12215 Site Name: King City/P04037-C 10. Further proof to the integrity of these structure-types are the fact that all EEI monopole structures in the Florida region withstood the direct impact of Hurricane Andrew with absolutely no structural damage reported. Wind loading was reported to be in the range of 100-120 MPH. Most recently, all EEI monopoles in the Wilmington, NC region withstood the force of Hurricanes Bertha and Fran, which had wind speeds of 105 MPH and wind gusts of 115 MPH. 11.In another incident, an EEI monopole withstood the impact of a run away bulldozer, which rammed the monopole at the base. The monopole stood firm with only a dent in the shaft. After field repairs, this monopole is still in service and performing to its design capacity. 12. EEI has never experienced a structural failure due to weather induced overloading. EEI personnel have over 75 years combined experience in design and fabrication of these types of structures. In response to your inquiry regarding the quality of steel and fabrication of a monopole structure: 1) The monopole is fabricated from ASTM A572 Grade 65 material with a controlled silicon content of 0.06% maximum to promote a uniform galvanized coating. The base plate material is fabricated from A572mod Grade 60 material. All plate material meets a Charpy V-Notch toughness requirement of 15 ft-lbs @ -20° Fahrenheit. By meeting the strict toughness requirement, the monopole is best suited to resist the cyclic/fatigue type loading (i.e., wind induced loading) these structures exhibit. Monopoles made of pipe sections or other types of steel do not meet these rigorous requirements. The toughness specification is based on 35 years of taper tubular poles being designed and manufactured for the electrical transmission and communication industries. 2) Anchor bolts are fabricated from A615 Grade 75 material. The bolts are 2 '/4 in diameter, made from #18J bar stock. All threads are rolled. Anchor bolts come complete with two (2) A194 Grade 2H hex nuts. The anchor bolt material must also meet a Charpy V-Notch toughness of 15 ft-lbs @ -20°Fahrenheit, to resist the cyclic/fatigue type loading (i.e., wind induced loading) these structures exhibit. EEI guarantees the quality of steel used on the entire monopole. Material Certifications (Mill Test Reports) are available on all material at the time of fabrication. The toughness requirement should be taken very seriously, for over the lifetime of the structure not having this toughness requirement, "toe" cracks may occur at the base of the structure and the structure could ultimately fail. 7610 Jenther Drive Engineered Endeavors,Inc. Mentor,OH 44060 Phone (440)918-1101 • Fax(440)918-1 108 Reference: Design and Reliability of 100 ft(4) Carrier Flagpole in Tigard, oR Initial Failure Point at 67 ft Elevation EEI Number: 12215 Site Name: King City/P04037-C Fabrication of the monopole is performed in accordance with the provisions of the AISC Manual of Steel Construction and ASCE's Design of Steel Transmission Pole Structures. All welding and inspection is in accordance with the American Welding Society's Specification D1.1 - latest revision. Testing and inspection reports are available upon request at the time of fabrication. EEI's monopole fabricator has an important certification as a quality fabricator AISC (American Institute of Steel Construction, Inc.) Conventional Steel Structure Certification. In conclusion, due to the aforementioned items, EEI's monopole structures never experienced a "free fall" type failure due to wind or seismic induced loads. I hope that these comments address the issues, which you might encounter relative to the anticipated performance of monopole structures and quality of steel and fabrication. However, I will be most happy to answer any specific questions, which you might have. Sincerely, ��EO PR0)% . Engineered Endeavors, Inc. rc sosG2PE` f 4 c vGOREGON sJ 4' Z Y 13, 'tsl9 OQ Michael R. Morel, P.E. ��( ROBEaN Vice President of Engineering \Iv <\4k's 7610 Jenther Drive Engineered Endeavors,Inc. Mentor,OH 44060 Phone(440)918-1101 • Fax(440)918-1108 67-0'POLE- KING CITY P04037-C- 12215- GS549Rn-Jr.-7 NOW CUSTOMER TO SUPPLY A , '4(A194-2H) JACKING H N Y BRACKETS FOA MATERIAL R E Q'D. PER ASSEMBLY •1 ANTENNA ENCLOSURE. �f N S• O CRCL 0S I1T 26'4 AMS SYSTEM CAP 0 IpI —L 1 i/2 . 26 1/24 GALV. WT. QTY. ITEM MK. N0. DESCRIPTION 6� (A572 MOO 60) a __ 1 1 --- SHAFT ASSY. (TOP SECTION) O 26'4.B'-0'LG.LIGHT DUTY ALMS SYSTEM./. 1/2'0.0.MOUNTING PIPE , 7. Y �� t 6 tt$PL(E,E =( _ �'�� _• ° __ 1 2 --- SHAFT ASSY. (BOTTOM SECTION) •CL OF ENCLOSURE 0I y6" O Fill■ n L. NO E: FOR REQUIRED TOLERANCES AT o IiIII ° N J 31.4'. 4 3 K11497 10" x 30" ACCESS PORT COVER PL 9 26'4•8'-0'LC.LIGHT OUTY AMS ) ( /47 SLIP JOINTS AND REOD. JACKING 'v IL 1 '� O 4 HARDWARE AS FOLLOWS: SYSTEM./4 I/2'0.0. MOUNTING PIPE `` . I FORCES SEE'STRUCTURE ASSEMBLY ' a : pA- " ! AND ERECTION PROCEDURES'. CL OF ENCLOSURE - - - '1 'P1 / \ n 'I'■pI • 2.11 3 4 K11498 5" x 7" HANDHOLE COVER PL t ^ ` `'� ((12) I 1/e'4 HOLES /1011 - A 1�2- ON A 22"4 BOLT CIRCLE Ii 2'HORIZ. SHAFT 101.45 4 5 2.25-A86ODE-4 2 1/4'' .6'-0'LG. (A615-CR75)ANCHOR of 10 26'4.8'-0'LG. MEDIUM DUTY AMS O 30' APART /III ORIENTATION WELD • / BOLTS w/(4)HEA NUTS(A194-GR2H),EACH SYSTEM w/4 1/2'O.D.MW NTING PIPE 19 1/2'•OPENING BEAD 0 CORNER OF / ' STRUCTURE ASSEMBLY AND m CL OF ENCLOSURE , 1'4(A194-2H)JACKING H N FLATS/7&8 1 6 ERECTION PROCEDURES tl WELDED OVER I 3/15-0 HOLES VIEW "A—A' IN SHAFT 0 CL FLATS 2&,1 112.42 2 7 4-43.00-2.250 SETTING TEMPLATE •� it 26'4•8'-0'LG HEAVY DUTY ANS NOTE-. AM5 REMOVED FOR CLARITY SYSTEM w/6'OD.MOUNTING PIPE , SLIP JOINT JACKING 0.40 6 8 G513220 3/B"m KELLUMS HOOK ASSY. CL OF ENCLOSURE II PROVISION DETAIL 559.21 2 9 K11543 26/.4 4 1/2'O.G.LM LIGHTG DUTY PIPE SYSTEM 26'4■8'-0'LG. MEDIUM DUTY AMS SYSTEM 875.12 10 K11S44 2fi••B'-O LC HEAVY DUTY A45 SYSTEM O- •i /4 1/2'0.0. MOUNTING PIPE '� ♦ I 1273.97 1 11 K11548 ./6'0.0.MOUNTING PIPE ',.- ,.,. 60.48 1 12 K11453 26"0 AMS SYSTEM CAP co °"' 7.50 i 13 K10062 20" BUSS BAR KIT °' b \ g� CL 5'•7'0D HANDHOLE `CI.KELLUMS HOOK • O e •CL FLATS 4. 10 k 16 INTERIOR 0 CL FLATS ^' • 1 14 ' GALLON TOUCH-UP PAINT o 3,6,9.12, 15k1B v C D c m a UL,7, O 'Y 1< Z rvt � �N <m O -I - a ■ O: D a t L.4 Z CL SPLICE I I s U4 <N $„ •r- - �x \ ,,p,-.1. 7.12 •0 • \ Y '" 0 a a.\_$ TOTAL GALV. STR. & ACCES. WT. k o SEE SLIP JOINT JACKING PROVISION 0'. 30' W TOTAL ANCHOR BOLT & TEMPLATE WT. 630.62E DETAIL(TYP. 0 EACH SPLICE) //////'''ACCESS PORT / •4'-0'ELEV U 2' / GENERAL NOTES I- - !-t I) MONOPOLE IS DESIGNED IN ACCORDANCE WITH TIA/EIA-222F FOR 80 MPH FASTEST MILE WINO SPEED AND O /e 610. 1 • 10' SO' 1/2'RADIAL ICE(NON-CONCURRENTLY). DESIGN MEETS 2000 IBC- 100 MPH WINO SPEED(3-SECOND OUST). Z ACCESS PORT w .� 2) ALL WELDS SHALL BE IN ACCORDANCE WITH AWS D.1.1. (LATEST EDITION). LONGITUDINAL SEAM WELDS 1/� ,.,1 •/3-O'ELEV WITHIN SLIP-JOINT AREA IN FEMALE SECTION SHALL BE 1005 PENETRATION. _ + '• 3) MONOPOLE SHALL BE HOT DIP GALVANIZED PER ASTM A123 AND THEN PAINTED MATTE GREY. 2 10'. 30" 011 1•I U ACCESS PORT ,6/ 4) CONTRACTOR SHALL THOROUGHLY REVIEW EEL'S ASSEMBLY A ERECTION PROCEDURE PRIOR TO INITIATING THE i 0 8'-0"ELEV 17� ERECTION OFF THE MONOPOLE ',FAILS,' Vi= 5) THE ORIENTATION OF THE MONOPOLE SHALL BE VERIFIED PRIOR TO ERECTION OF THE POLE. w I r 6) SECTIONS OF THE MONOPOLE SHALL BE JACKED TOGETHER WITH A MINIMUM JACKING FORCE OF 10,000 IDI 0: 0 n 3.. 10. 30' APPLIED TO EACH SIDE. FOR A MAXIMUM RECOMMENDED JACKING FORCE.SPLICE LENGTH TOLERANCE, AND I \ nA ACCESS PORT 0 4'-0'ELEV AIR GAP BETWEEN SECTIONS REFER TO EEI ASSEMBLY A ERECTION PROCEDURE _ Y IQ!! 7) FOR PROPER SHAFT ALIGNMENT A 2'HORIZONTAL WELD BEAD AND A MARK ARE POSITIONED 04 EACH SHAFT I I `� � D OV AT EACH SPLICE. THE 2'HORIZONTAL HELD BEADS ARE ON THE MATCHING CORNERS. THE MARK NUMBER IS Q a� SECTION "B-B" C R ON THE ADJACENT FLAT. THE CORNERS WITH BEAD BEADS SHALL BE ALIGNED FROM TOP TO BOTTOM OF THE OD G POLE. MARK NUMBERS SHALL BE MATCHED FOR EACH SIDE B THE DISTANCE BETWEEN TWO WELD BEADS SHOULD } ^a BE 18'(±4) 2 �4G• ,°l �. .0 B) FIELD ASSEMBLY NUTS(1'4)FOR JACKING SECTIONS TOGETHER ARE LOCATED ON OPPOSING SECTION FLATS AL \\ �f /� YP h. ABOVE AND BELOW SPLICES. O 6 1 '2PE '•}+ 9)CAP BETWEEN TOP OF THE FOUNDATION AND BOTTOM OF THE BASE PLATE MAY BE FILLED WITH A NON-SHRINK Z 0 / GROUT WITH A MINIMUM COMPRESSIVE STRENGTH OF F-21100 psi. WATER DRAINAGE MUST BE PROVIDED I 1 UNDERNEATH THE BASE PLATE TO ENSURE THAT MOISTURE DOES NOT COLLECT INSIDE THE MONOPOLE r- A / 2 / 10) ALL BOLTED CONNECTIONS WITH A325 HIGH-STRENGTH BOLTS SHALL BE ASSEMBLED IN ACCORDANCE WITH 0• GF1lV'J Y `J ' SPECIFICATIONS FOR STRUCTURAL JOINTS USING A325 OR A490 BOLTS BOLTS SHALL BE BROUGHT TO Z o SNUG-TIGHT CONDITIONS AS RECOMMENDED BY THE FLANGE SPECIFICATIONS IN FLANGE-TYPE JOINTS AND J �� v�� I ^� /,. SHOULD BE SHIMMED IF NECESSARY. THE SHIMS WILL BE SUPPLIED BY EEL. 13 O Y 13 ICON OQv )ANCHOR BOLTS SHALL BE TIGHTENED AFTER THE STRUCTURE IS PLUMB.BOTH ROTH TOP R BOTTOM NUT SHALL BE 7 TIGHTENED TO 600 N-I6s MOMENT FOR DETAIL ANCHOR BOLT INSTALLATION REFER TO EEI ASSEMBLY W BUSS BAR SQL AND ERECTION PROCEDURE. W 10'4 3D'ACCESS OPENING `1•L ` 4 \V� ./COVER(TYPO 4 PLACES) s �Op�R� 12)POLE TAPER - 0.149BIn/1t. GROUND LUG 0 1• /,/ ,i'''''-78-1",...,\\\ PL 1 I/2'• 43'•3'-7' -- a FLATS 3 r 12� m / (Asn MoD 60) ENGINEERED ENDEAVORS°< l I INCORPOTED,1 7•'r 1 6/ prnees\ 7/ 7 (4)2 3/4'4 HOLES ON A c� �wORK POINT I I I r \\\� 1j,/ /�, 43-•BOLT CIRCLE 7610 JeYIher Dave•MMta.OH 44060-4872 GROUND LINE _ I ' .." Ph: (440) 918-1101 • Ph, (888) 270-3855 (4)2 1/4'4.6'-0'LONG © _ 25"4 OPENING F4: (440) 918-1108 • www.engend.cl7m 49 1/2'4 ROUND PL DOUBLE ENO THREADED (BEFORE TRIMMING) (A615-GR75)ANCHOR BOLTS 0 100'-0" DISGUISED POLE ./(4)HEX NUTS EACH 4-4300-2250 SECTION "C—C" T—MOBILE/WA k A l'-0"PROJECTION TOP A BOTTOM TEMPLATES (BDrBEMBOLTEO/(2))RA..) KING CITY, P04037—C ERECTION VIEW ASSEMBLY MARKING PROCEDURE. WASHINGTON COUNTY, OR NOTE: ALL ELEVATIONS SHOWN I SCALE NONE EACH INDIVIDUAL ASSEMBLY SHALL HAVE A METAL THIS DRAG IS CONFIDENTIAL AND MAY NOT BE FROM BOTTOM OF BASE PLATES TAG WELDED TO IT WHICH WILL BE ENGRAVED WITH LOANED.REPRODUCED. COPIED EITHER WHOLLY OR IN WIN r,.X NONE PROJECT NO 2215 UNLESS OTHERWISE NOTED THE ASSEMBLY MARK NO AS SHOWN IN THE MATERIAL PART,OR MADE PUBLIC IN ANY MANNER WITHOUT THE 0 COMPLETED APPROVAL DWG 1Z/)9/0.3 J.G. BLOCK. (MINIMUM OF 5/B HIGH LETTERS) WRITTEN CONSENT OF ENGINEERED ENDEAVORS INC.-ALL w 1 0 I DRAWING NO RIGHTS OF DESIGN OR INVENTION ARE RESERVED w• 0.71,110. 04,4 em ,,, _ _ . GS54980 ENGINEERED Customer T—MOBILE/WA BY L. PADGETT 12/18/03 ENDEAVORS Dote Structure 100' DISGUISED POLE Checked 12215 INCORPORATED Job/Quote No. SITE LOCATION — WASHINGTON COUNTY, OR SITE NAME — KING CITY, P04037—C 1 ANTENNA LOADING: AGL (3) DR65-19-02DPQ DIRECTIONAL ANTENNAS (1 ) 26"0 x 8' AMS ( 96' AGL 8' (3) DR65-19-02DPQ DIRECTIONAL ANTENNAS (1 ) 26"0 x 8' AMS © 88' AGL 80' AGL (3) DR65-19-02DPQ DIRECTIONAL ANTENNAS too' (1 ) 26"o x 8' AMS © 80' AGL 72' AGL (3) DR65-19-02DPQ DIRECTIONAL ANTENNAS (1 ) 26"0 x 8' AMS © 72' AGL 67' DESIGN NOTES: DESIGNED IN ACCORDANCE WITH TIA/EIA 222 F 80 MPH FASTEST MILE WIND AND 2000 IBC 100 MPH 3—SECOND GUS ' IND. 1 /2" RADIAL ICE. Si T ,:��EDPRp�� ■ T 1 � � Grade <// iS'" ;T Pit/ C (/// ��c' �r NOTE:: IT IS THE RESPONSIBILITY 4.4 RO; OF THE PURCHASER TO VERIFY THAT THE WIND LOADS AND DESIGN CRITERIA SPECIFIED MEET THE REQUIREMENTS OF ALL LOCAL BUILDING CODES 7610 Jenther Drive * Mentor, Ohio 44060 ENGINEERED ENDEAVORS, INC. Telephone: (440) 918-1101 * Telefax: (440) 918-1108 Engineered Endeavors Inc. 7610 Jenther Drive Mentor, Ohio 44060 Tel (440) 918-1101 Fax (440) 918-1108 Communications Structure Nonlinear Analysis and Design Program 16:35:32 12-18-2003 Revision 1.3 - 2/07/00 Engineer: L. PADGETT Customer T-MOBILE/WA Job Name 12215 Structure 100' DISGUISED POLE Location WASHINGTON COUNTY, OR Site KING CITY, P04037-C OD OD NUM. THICK TAPER LENGTH JOINT JOINT YIELD WEIGHT JOINT BOT TOP SIDES INCH IN/FT FT INCH TYPE KSI LBS HEIGHT 28 . 72 25 . 50 18 0 . 1875 0 . 149 21 . 58 50 . 00 SLIP 65 . 0 1162 . 47 . 50 35 . 00 27 . 60 18 0 . 2500 0 . 149 49 . 58 0 . 00 BASEPL 65 . 0 4106 . 0 . 00 TOTAL TUBE WEIGHT 5269 . POUNDS POLE SHAFT LENGTH 67 . 00 FEET E = 29600 . 0 KSI UNIT WGT = 0 . 283 LBS/CU IN AISC constants are used for stress reductions . TUBE SECTIONS HAVE 18 SIDES AND ARE TREATED AS ROUND Internal bend radius = 3 X T Tube diameters are measured flat to flat . Tube diameters are increased by 1 . 020 for wind across points . Drag coefficients are increase by 1 . 300 for steps on the pole . AISC Tube Shape Coefficient of 1 . 000 is applied. ORIGINAL DATA FILE NAME t : \eng4\quotes03\31488100 REVISED DATA FILE NAME t : \eng4\JOBS12\12216100 APPURTENANCES DESCRIPTION NUM. ELEV. Kz AREA WGT Ca AREA WGT Ca FACTOR < WITHOUT ICE > < WITH ICE > 26 in x 10 ft ENCLOS 1 95 . 1 . 353 22 . 10 510 . 0 . 8000 23 . 10 700 . 0 . 8000 1 . 00 26 in x 10 ft ENCLOS 1 87 . 1 . 319 22 . 10 960 . 0 . 8000 23 . 10 1100 . 0 . 8000 1 . 00 26 in x 10 ft ENCLOS 1 79 . 1 . 283 22 . 10 960 . 0 . 8000 23 . 10 1100 . 0 . 8000 1 . 00 26 in x 10 ft ENCLOS 1 71 . 1 . 245 22 . 10 1354 . 0 . 8000 23 . 10 1500 . 0 . 8000 1 . 00 Engineered Endeavors Inc. 100' DISGUISED POLE 12215 PAGE 2 LOAD CASE 1 BASIC LOADING DEAD LOAD FACTOR 1 . 00 WIND PSF REDUCTION 1 . 00 RADIAL ICE 0 . 00 IN. WIND VELOCITY 80 BOTTOM 16 . 52 PSF TOP 19 . 76 PSF MAX BASE ROTATION 0 . 00 DEG APPLIED APPURTENANCE FORCES ELEVATION WEIGHT WIND FT KIPS KIPS 26 in x 10 ft ENCLOSURE 95 . 00 0 . 510 0 . 662 26 in x 10 ft ENCLOSURE 87 . 00 0 . 960 0 . 646 26 in x 10 ft ENCLOSURE 79 . 00 0 . 960 0 . 628 26 in x 10 ft ENCLOSURE 71 . 00 1 . 354 0 . 609 TUBE PROPERTIES I MEMBER FORCES I STRESSES I STRESS I TOTAL ELEV DIAM WALL SHEAR BENDING AXIAL AXIAL BEND. ALLOW RATIOS DEFL TILT FT IN IN K K-FT K KSI KSI KSI IN DEG 67 . 00 25 . 50 0 . 1875 2 . 85 41 . 43 4 . 06 0 . 27 5 . 31 46 . 98 0 . 11 8 . 6 1 . 12 56 . 50 27 . 07 0 . 1875 2 . 85 71 . 33 4 . 06 0 . 26 8 . 10 46 . 36 0 . 18 6 . 3 0 . 99 47 . 50 28 .41 0 . 1875 3 . 27 100 . 75 4 . 59 0 . 28 10 . 38 45 . 89 0 . 23 4 . 6 0 . 85 TYPE OF JOINT: SLIP JOINT 47 . 50 27 . 91 0 . 2500 3 . 77 100 . 75 5 . 70 0 . 26 8 . 12 49 . 29 0 . 17 4 . 6 0 . 85 33 . 00 30 . 07 0 . 2500 3 . 77 155 . 44 5 . 70 0 . 24 10 . 77 48 . 36 0 . 23 2 .3 0 . 63 22 . 00 31 . 72 0 . 2500 4 . 30 202 . 75 6 . 72 0 . 27 12 . 61 47 . 74 0 . 27 1 . 0 0 . 44 11 . 00 33 . 36 0 . 2500 4 . 76 255 . 15 7 . 65 0 . 29 14 . 33 47 . 18 0 . 31 0 . 3 0 . 23 0 . 00 35 . 00 0 . 2500 5 . 50 312 . 80 9 . 13 0 . 33 15 . 94 46 . 67 0 . 35 0 . 0 0 . 00 REACTION COMPONENTS (KIPS AND FT-KIPS) TRANSVERSE VERTICAL WIND MOMENT ABOUT MOMENT ABOUT MOMENT ABOUT SHEAR FORCE SHEAR TRANSVERSE VERTICAL WIND AXIS 0 . 000 9 . 127 -5 . 500 312 . 799 0 . 000 0 . 000 Engineered Endeavors Inc. 100' DISGUISED POLE 12215 PAGE 3 LOAD CASE 2 BASIC LOADING PLUS ICE DEAD LOAD FACTOR 1 . 00 WIND PSF REDUCTION 0 . 75 RADIAL ICE 0 . 50 IN. WIND VELOCITY 80 BOTTOM 12 . 39 PSF TOP 14 . 82 PSF MAX BASE ROTATION 0 . 00 DEG APPLIED APPURTENANCE FORCES ELEVATION WEIGHT WIND FT KIPS KIPS 26 in x 10 ft ENCLOSURE 95 . 00 0 . 700 0 . 519 26 in x 10 ft ENCLOSURE 87 . 00 1 . 100 0 . 506 26 in x 10 ft ENCLOSURE 79 . 00 1 . 100 0 . 492 26 in x 10 ft ENCLOSURE 71 . 00 1 . 500 0 . 478 TUBE PROPERTIES 1 MEMBER FORCES 1 STRESSES 1 STRESS I TOTAL ELEV DIAM WALL SHEAR BENDING AXIAL AXIAL BEND . ALLOW RATIOS DEFL TILT FT IN IN K K-FT K KSI KSI KSI IN DEG 67 . 00 25 . 50 0 . 1875 2 . 24 32 .48 4 . 68 0 . 31 4 . 16 46 . 98 0 . 09 6 . 8 0 . 87 56 . 50 27 . 07 0 . 1875 2 . 24 56 . 00 4 . 68 0 . 30 6 . 36 46 . 36 0 . 14 4 . 9 0 . 78 47 . 50 28 . 41 0 . 1875 2 . 57 79 . 10 5 . 20 0 . 31 8 . 15 45 . 89 0 . 18 3 . 6 0 . 67 TYPE OF JOINT: SLIP JOINT 47 . 50 27 . 91 0 . 2500 2 . 96 79 . 10 6 . 32 0 . 29 6 . 38 49 . 29 0 . 13 3 . 6 0 . 67 33 . 00 30 . 07 0 . 2500 2 . 96 121 . 96 6 . 32 0 . 27 8 . 45 48 . 36 0 . 18 1 . 8 0 . 49 22 . 00 31 . 72 0 . 2500 3 . 36 158 . 96 7 . 33 0 . 30 9 . 89 47 . 74 0 . 21 0 . 8 0 . 34 11 . 00 33 . 36 0 . 2500 3 . 72 199 . 87 8 . 26 0 . 32 11 . 23 47 . 18 0 . 24 0 . 2 0 . 18 0 . 00 35 . 00 0 . 2500 4 . 29 244 . 83 9 . 74 0 . 36 12 . 48 46 . 67 0 . 27 0 . 0 0 . 00 REACTION COMPONENTS (KIPS AND FT-KIPS) TRANSVERSE VERTICAL WIND MOMENT ABOUT MOMENT ABOUT MOMENT ABOU1 SHEAR FORCE SHEAR TRANSVERSE VERTICAL WIND AXIS 0 . 000 9 . 743 -4 . 286 244 . 826 0 . 000 0 . 000 Engineered Endeavors Inc. 100' DISGUISED POLE 12215 PAGE 4 SUMMARY TABLE ELEV STRESS RATIO AXIAL BENDING LOADING 67 . 00 0 . 11 4 . 06 41 .4 1 BASIC LOADING 56 . 50 0 . 18 4 . 06 71 . 3 1 BASIC LOADING 47 . 50 0 . 23 4 . 59 100 . 8 1 BASIC LOADING 33 . 00 0 . 23 5 . 70 155 . 4 1 BASIC LOADING 22 . 00 0 . 27 6 . 72 202 . 8 1 BASIC LOADING 11 . 00 0 . 31 7 . 65 255 . 1 1 BASIC LOADING 0 . 00 0 . 35 9 . 13 312 . 8 1 BASIC LOADING MAXIMUM SUPPORT MOMENT K-FT 312 . 80 CORRESPONDING AXIAL FORCE KIPS 9 . 13 CORRESPONDING SHEAR FORCE KIPS 5 . 50 Engineered Endeavors Inc. 100' DISGUISED POLE 12215 PAGE 5 BASE PLATE AT ELEVATION 0 . 00 FEET TUBE DIAMETER 35 . 00 INCHES DESIGN MOMENT 312 . 8 KIP FT DESIGN MOMENT IS 0 . DEGREES FROM THE WIND DIRECTION BOLTS ARE ON THE KNUCKLES OF THE TUBE APPLIED AXIAL FORCE 9 . 1 KIPS APPLIED SHEAR 5 . 50 KIPS BOLT DATA BOLT TYPE A615 GR75 BOLTS ARE CLUSTERED SPACING BETWEEN BOLTS 0 . 000 INCHES ANGLE BETWEEN BOLTS 0 . 000 DEGREES DIAMETER 2 . 250 INCHES EFFECTIVE AREA 3 . 250 SQ IN TOTAL LENGTH 6 . 0 FEET End plates are required. MINIMUM EMBEDMENT 4 . 6 FEET NUMBER OF BOLTS 4 BOLT CIRCLE DIAMETER 43 . 00 INCHES ALLOWABLE STRESS 60 . 0 KSI APPLIED AXIAL STRESS 27 . 6 KSI MAX BOLT FORCE 89 . 6 KIPS BOLT BENDING STRESS 2 . 0 KSI COMBINED BOLT STRESS 29 . 6 KSI CLEARANCE UNDER PLATE 3 . 25 INCHES BOLT WEIGHT 338 . 4 POUNDS PLATE DATA WIDTH OF TRIM ROUND 43 . 00 INCHES DIAMETER OF TRIM ROUND 49 . 50 INCHES ORIENTATION: BENDING ACROSS POINTS MATERIAL A572 GR60 PROVIDED THICKNESS 1 . 500 INCHES REQUIRED THICKNESS 1 . 179 INCHES BOLT HOLE DIAMETER 2 . 625 INCHES CENTER HOLE SIZE 25 . 00 INCHES NET WEIGHT 507 . 9 POUNDS RAW STOCK WEIGHT 784 . 9 POUNDS SURFACE AREA 16 . 62 SQ FT ALLOWABLE STRESS 59 . 99 KSI MAX APPLIED STRESS 37 . 03 KSI CONCRETE STRENGTH 3000 . PSI Base Plate - use 43 . 00 inch TRIM ROUND x 1 . 500 inch A572 GR60 with ( 4) 2 . 250 diameter x 6 . 00 foot caged A615 GR75 bolts on a 43 . 00 inch bolt circle . End plates are required. ENGINEERED E E �,•� ENDEAVORS INCORPORATED EMERSON. 7ne E.xperk,nced Point of View a=! °_iv's°. k' DESIGN CALCULATIONS FOR A DRILLED PIER FOUNDATION T-Mobile 100' monopole King City / P0-4037-c Site Tigard , WA EEI Project Number 12215 December 19, 2003 7610 Jenther Drive • Mentor, Ohio 44060-4872 Phone: (440) 918-1101 • Phone: (888) 270-3855 Fax: (440) 918-1108 • www.engend.com FOUNDA IION DESIGN CALCULAT1‘, S FOR A DRILLED PIER FOUNDATION ENGINEERED �'► EAVOS , E INCORPORATED EMERSON.. The ExperMnce d PM,∎1 Of Vira ik a$.a.$iri e■. _, CUSTOMER: T-Mobile DATE: 12/19/03 LOCATION: Tigard,WA STRUCTURE: 100'monopole SITE NAME: King City JOB NUMBER: 12215 SITE NUMBER: PO-4037-c STATUS: Release FOUNDATION DESIGN LOADS MOMENT SHEAR AXIAL LOAD UNITS j-kips kips kips in-lbs lbs lbs DESIGN LOADING 312.8 5.5 9.1 3753600.0 5500.0 9100.0 PIER PROPERTIES ANCHOR BOLT CIRCLE 43.0 in ACTUAL DIAMETER 66.0 in ANCHOR BOLT DESCRIPTION (4)2 1/4 in BOLTS AT 6 ft 0 in PIER AREA 3421.2 in^2 MINIMUM DIAMETER 63.0 in MOMENT OF INERTIA 931420.2 in^4 SOIL INFORMATION SOIL DESCRIPTION DEPTH DEPTH Ku VALUE 4) y COHESION £sa ft in pci degrees pcf/pci psf/psi in/in sand 2.0 24 70 32 115 7.5 90 0.067 sand 7.5 90 225 34 120 15.0 180 0.069 sand 15.0 180 85 28 58 20.5 246 0.033 sand 20.5 246 250 33 58 40.0 480 0.033 40.0 480 GROUNDWATER @15' DISREGARD UPPER 36in OF SOIL NORMAL SOIL EMBEDMENT Ln= 12.0 ft ACTUAL EMBEDMENT La= 21.0 ft TOTAL LENGTH L= 22.0 ft CONCRETE VOLUME V= 19.4 yds^3 CONCRETE REINFORCEMENT BAR SIZE BAR WEIGHT QUANTITY LENGTH WEIGHT VERTICAL BARS #I 1 5.313 lbs/ft 12 21.5 ft 1370.8 lbs HORIZONTAL TIES #5 1.043 lbs/ft 24 16.92 ft 423.5 lbs TOTAL 1794.2 lbs PIER STRUCTURAL DESI,__d UNFACTORED MOMENT 4188000 in-lbs UNFACTORED SHEAR 38670 lbs MAXIMUM BENDING MOMENT 453.7 ft-klps MAXIMUM SHEAR FORCE 50.3 kips PIER DIAMETER 66 in CONCRETE 3 ksi REINFORCEMENT 60 ksi REBAR #11 QUANTITY 12 BAR AREA 1.56 in^2 DESIGN REBAR QUANTITY 12 BAR AREA 1.56 in^2 MINIMUM REINFORCEMENT RATIO: 0.0050 REBAR SPACING 14.30 in ACTUAL REINFORCEMENT RATIO: 0.0055 CONCRETE COVER 4 in HORIZONTAL TIES 23 REBAR LAYOUT RADIUS 27.3125 in NUMBER ANGLE COORDINATE DGE DISTANCE degrees in in 1 27.31 5.69 2 30 23.65 9.35 3 60 13.66 19.34 4 90 0.00 33.00 5 120 -13.66 46.66 6 150 -23.65 56.65 7 180 -27.31 60.31 8 210 -23.65 56.65 9 240 -13.66 46.66 10 270 0.00 33.00 11 300 13.66 19.34 12 330 23.65 9.35 LOCATION OF NEUTRAL AXIS c- 10.943 in COMPRESSION ZONE a= 9.302 In COMPRESSION ZONE TENSION ZONE REBAR a FORCE REBAR e FORCE kips kips 1 0.0014 61.20 3 0.0023 93.60 2 0.0004 15.82 4 0.0060 93.60 12 0.0004 15.82 5 0.0098 93.60 6 0.0125 93.60 7 0.0135 93.60 8 0.0125 93.60 9 0.0098 93.60 10 0.0060 93.60 11 0.0023 93.60 CONCRETE 749.57 COMPRESSION 842.41 kips TENSION 842.40 kips MAXIMUM MOMENT CAPACITY MOMENT DUE TO COMPRESSION MOMENT DUE TO TENSION REBAR FORCE ARM MOMENT REBAR FORCE ARM MOMENT kips in fi-kips kips in fi-kips 1 61.20 27.31 139.30 3 93.60 13.66 -106.52 2 15.82 23.65 31.18 4 93.60 0.00 0.00 12 15.82 23.65 31.18 5 93.60 -13.66 106.52 6 93.60 -23.65 184.50 CONCRETE 749.57 26.80 1673.97 7 93.60 -27.31 213.04 8 93.60 -23.65 184.50 9 93.60 -13.66 106.52 10 93.60 0.00 0.00 11 93.60 13.66 -106.52 1875.64 582.03 DESIGN MOMENT 2211.90 ft-kips Pier Overt. 'ing Stability Check EEI Project No. 12215 Base Moment, kip-ft 312,8 Pier Diameter, ft 5.5 Date 12/19/03 Shear Force, kips 5.5 Groundwater, ft 15.0 Vertical Force, kips 9.1 Pier Embedment. 21.0 ff Disregard, ft 3.0 Soil Properties Information Soil Layer Depth, ft Y C, psf Kp sand 7.5 115.0 32.0 0.0 3.25 sand 15.0 120.0 34.00 0.0 3.54 sand, 20.5 57.6 28.0 0.0 2.77 sand 40.0 57.6 33.0 0.0 3.39 Zero Line, ft 14.2 Force 1.802% Imbalance Resisting 3,231.91 Overturning 396.40 Moment, k-ft Moment, k-f Safety Factor 8.15 Licensed to: Boris 1 .tan Engineered Endeavors, Inc. PROGRAM LPILE plus Version 3 . 0 (C) COPYRIGHT 1997 ENSOFT, INC. ALL RIGHTS RESERVED King City Site UNITS--ENGLISH UNITS I N P U T I N F O R M A T I O N ********************************* THE LOADING IS STATIC PILE GEOMETRY AND PROPERTIES PILE LENGTH = 264.00 IN 2 POINTS X DIAMETER MOMENT OF AREA MODULUS OF INERTIA ELASTICITY IN IN IN**4 IN**2 LBS/IN**2 .00 66.000 .931E+06 .342E+04 .300E+07 264.00 66.000 .931E+06 .342E+04 .300E+07 SOILS INFORMATION X AT THE GROUND SURFACE = 48.00 IN SLOPE ANGLE AT THE GROUND SURFACE _ .00 DEG. 4 LAYER(S) OF SOIL LAYER 1 THE SOIL IS A SAND - P-Y CRITERIA BY REESE ET AL, 1974 X AT THE TOP OF THE LAYER = 48.00 IN X AT THE BOTTOM OF THE LAYER = 102 .00 IN MODULUS OF SUBGRADE REACTION = .700E+02 LBS/IN**3 LAYER 2 THE SOIL IS A SAND - P-Y CRITERIA BY REESE ET AL, 1974 X AT THE TOP OF THE LAYER = 102 .00 IN X AT THE BOTTOM OF THE LAYER = 192 .00 IN MODULUS OF SUBGRADE REACTION = .225E+03 LBS/IN**3 LAYER 3 THE SOIL IS A SAND - P-Y CRITERIA BY REESE ET AL, 1974 X AT THE TOP OF THE LAYER = 192.00 IN X AT THE BOTTOM OF THE LAYER = 258.00 IN MODULUS OF SUBGRADE REACTION = .850E+02 LBS/IN**3 LAYER 4 THE SOIL IS A SAND - P-Y CRITERIA BY REESE ET AL, 1974 X AT THE TOP OF THE LAYER = 258.00 IN X AT THE BOTTOM OF THE LAYER = 492. 00 IN MODULUS OF SUBGRADE REACTION = .250E+03 LBS/IN**3 DISTRIBUTION OF EFFECTIVE UNIT WEIGHT WITH DEPTH 8 POINTS X, IN WEIGHT,LBS/IN**3 36.00 .67E-01 102 .00 .67E-01 102 .00 .69E-01 192 .00 .69E-01 192 .00 .33E-01 258. 00 .33E-01 258 .00 .33E-01 492 .00 .33E-01 DISTRIBUTION OF STRENGTH PARAMETERS WITH DEPTH 8 POINTS X, IN C,LBS/IN**2 PHI,DEGREES E50 36.00 .000E+00 .320E+02 102 .00 . 000E+00 .320E+02 102 .00 . 000E+00 .340E+02 192.00 . 000E+00 .340E+02 192 .00 .000E+00 .280E+02 258 . 00 .000E+00 .280E+02 258 . 00 . 000E+00 .330E+02 492 .00 .000E+00 .330E+02 BOUNDARY AND LOADING CONDITIONS LOADING NUMBER 1 BOUNDARY-CONDITION CODE = 1 LATERAL LOAD AT THE PILE HEAD = .550E+04 LBS MOMENT AT THE PILE HEAD = .375E+07 IN-LBS AXIAL LOAD AT THE PILE HEAD = . 910E+04 LBS FINITE-DIFFERENCE PARAMETERS NUMBER OF PILE INCREMENTS = 100 DEFLECTION TOLERANCE ON DETERMINATION OF CLOSURE = .100E-04 IN MAXIMUM NUMBER OF ITERATIONS ALLOWED FOR PILE ANALYSIS = 100 MAXIMUM ALLOWABLE DEFLECTION = .10E+03 IN OUTPUT CODES KOUTPT = 1 KPYOP = 0 INC = 5 O U T P U T I N F O R M A T I O N ********************************* ************************************************* * COMPUTE LOAD-DISTRIBUTION AND LOAD-DEFLECTION * * CURVES FOR LATERAL LOADING ************************************************* LOADING NUMBER 1 BOUNDARY CONDITION CODE = 1 LATERAL LOA. . THE PILE HEAD = .! 2+04 LBS MOMENT AT THE PILE HEAD = .375E+07 IN-LBS AXIAL LOAD AT THE PILE HEAD = .910E+04 LBS X DEFLECTION MOMENT SHEAR SLOPE TOTAL FLEXURAL SOIL STRESS RIGIDITY REACTION IN IN LBS-IN LBS RAD. LBS/IN**2 LBS-IN**2 LBS/IN ***** ********* ********* ********* ********* ********* ********* ********* .0 .129E+00 .375E+07 .550E+04 -.827E-03 .136E+03 .279E+13 .000E+00 13.2 .118E+00 .383E+07 .550E+04 - .809E-03 .138E+03 .279E+13 .000E+00 26.4 .107E+00 .390E+07 .550E+04 - .791E-03 .141E+03 .279E+13 .000E+00 39.6 .969E-01 .397E+07 .550E+04 - .772E-03 .143E+03 .279E+13 .000E+00 52.8 .869E-01 .404E+07 .543E+04 - .753E-03 .146E+03 .279E+13 - .292E+02 66.0 .770E-01 .411E+07 .457E+04 -.734E-03 .148E+03 .279E+13 - .971E+02 79.2 .675E-01 .416E+07 .294E+04 -.714E-03 .150E+03 .279E+13 -.147E+03 92.4 .582E-01 .419E+07 .758E+03 - .695E-03 .151E+03 .279E+13 -.181E+03 105.6 .492E-01 .418E+07 -.345E+04 -.675E-03 .151E+03 .279E+13 - .627E+03 118.8 .404E-01 .408E+07 -.118E+05 -.655E-03 .147E+03 .279E+13 -.635E+03 132.0 .319E-01 .387E+07 -.200E+05 -.636E-03 .140E+03 .279E+13 - .596E+03 145.2 .236E-01 .355E+07 -.274E+05 - .619E-03 .129E+03 .279E+13 - .511E+03 158.4 .155E-01 .315E+07 -.333E+05 - .603E-03 .114E+03 .279E+13 - .382E+03 171.6 .764E-02 .268E+07 -.372E+05 - .589E-03 .977E+02 .279E+13 - .211E+03 184.8 -.579E-04 .218E+07 -.387E+05 - .578E-03 .798E+02 .279E+13 . 176E+01 198.0 -.762E-02 .167E+07 -.377E+05 - .569E-03 .619E+02 .279E+13 .122E+03 211.2 -.151E-01 .119E+07 -.352E+05 -.562E-03 .448E+02 .279E+13 .258E+03 224.4 - .225E-01 .752E+06 -.308E+05 -.557E-03 .293E+02 .279E+13 .409E+03 237.6 - .298E-01 .385E+06 -.243E+05 -.555E-03 .163E+02 .279E+13 .576E+03 250.8 -.371E-01 .120E+06 -.155E+05 -.554E-03 .690E+01 .279E+13 .759E+03 264.0 - .444E-01 .000E+00 .000E+00 - .553E-03 .266E+01 .279E+13 .155E+04 OUTPUT VERIFICATION THE MAXIMUM MOMENT IMBALANCE FOR ANY ELEMENT = - .410E-03 IN-LBS THE MAX. LATERAL FORCE IMBALANCE FOR ANY ELEMENT = -.801E-04 LBS OUTPUT SUMMARY PILE-HEAD DEFLECTION = .129E+00 IN COMPUTED SLOPE AT PILE HEAD = - .827E-03 MAXIMUM BENDING MOMENT = .419E+07 LBS-IN MAXIMUM SHEAR FORCE = - .387E+05 LBS NO. OF ITERATIONS = 7 NO. OF ZERO DEFLECTION POINTS = 1 S U M M A R Y TAB L E ************************* BOUNDARY BOUNDARY AXIAL PILE HEAD MAX. MAX. CONDITION CONDITION LOAD DEFLECTION MOMENT SHEAR BC1 BC2 LBS IN IN-LBS LBS .5500E+04 .3754E+07 .9100E+04 .1286E+00 .4188E+07 - .3867E+05 Deflection(in) -0.04 -0.02 0 0.02 0.04 0.06 0.08 0.1 0.12 ° 1 I 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 I I I 1 I l I I I I 1 1 1 1 1 I 1 1 1 1 1 T I 1 1 ' _ I I I•i I ' , • _ I , _ I , 0 co — + 1— i I- •' 1 F -4 F—__ G — N _ _ I _ I — I , 7 r 7 r '1 r 1 1 L J L J L _ I _ 1 ' 1 — I o _ � N I — 1 � I - , N v Load:5500 N Bending Moment(in-kips) 0 500 1000 1500 2000 2500 3000 3500 4000 4500 5000 - I i I I 1111 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I 1 I _ 1 1 1 _ 1 1 ` 1 1 _ 1 1 „ ry _ J 1 L J ,._1 L 1 ,, I _ „ 1 ”1 vi V' - -1 + r r -1 r A. 0o - 1 -4 4- 1- -1 + " 1- - 1 - 1 , _ 1 „ ,:. O 1 r t_ . d _ A r J 1 L I- J_ 1 L ■ • 1 1 r r 1 T r 1 _ 1 1 1 I 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 _ 1 1 so J 1 L L J -L L I 0o r r r t r 1 1 I 1 1 1 1 1 _ 1 1 O _ I I N I I 1 1 I 1 - I 1 1 1 1 1 v Load:5500 N MATERIAL LIST FOUNDATION LOADING ITEM QTY. DESCRIPTION MOMENT 312.80 kip-ft SHEAR 5.50 kips 1 4 2 1/4"0 x 6'-0" (A615-GR.75) ANCHOR BOLTS AXIAL 9.10 kips 2 12 #11 REBAR x 21'-6" (ASTM A615-GR.60) 3 24 #5 REBAR x 17'-0" (ASTM A615-GR 60) 1. ANCHOR BOLTS SHALL BE ATTACHED w/(2) HEX NUTS TO BOTH TEMPLATES 2. ANCHOR BOLTS SHALL BE INSTALLED w/LONGER THREADED END UP. "A" A" VOL. CONCRETE ® 4000 psi (TYPE II CEMENT) 21.0 yd} ANCHOR BOLT PROJECTION 1 O STEEL (ASTM A615-GR.60) 1800.0 lbs 0 ., i ANCHOR BOLTS ON A -0.0 / ` , 43"0 BOLT CIRCLE — 1 f-1 1 1-1 1 I-1 I IJ I ® II. 1-1 I—II I—II 1 r—II I—II I I—Iii 4 I I=1 I =111=1 I I=1 n" 1 11=1 I1=1 I1=1 I I=i 11=1I 1- . r. a . GENERAL NOTES: -111-111=111=111= I °I -1 11=1I I1=1 11=1 1=1 I I- —111=11111 11111-1 I — I X111-111-111 a � 1. FOUNDATION ILREPORTDBYI IS BASE INC.,O REPORT NO. ORE03-,10039922111/21/2003 GS54980 I I I 1111=111- -,.t. . •..,� . —1 I —111- �4 I 2. FOUNDATION EMBEDMENT IS SHOWN FROM THE GROUND LEVEL AT THE TIME OF SOIL INVESTIGATION III - AS DEPICTED IN THE SOIL REPORT. SHOULD THE ACTUAL SOIL CONDITIONS DIFFER FROM THOSE -1 - °ANCHOR BOLT • IN THE REPORT, THE GEOTECHNICAL ENGINEER AND FOUNDATION DESIGNER SHOULD BE NOTIFIED ORIENTATION IN ORDER TO RE-EVALUATE THE FOUNDATION DESIGN. REQUIRED 3. SOIL REPORT SHOULD BE CONSULTED PRIOR TO CONSTRUCTION. STEEL CASING OR SLURRY METHOD VIEW"A-A" MAY BE REQUIRED TO PREVENT SOIL FROM CAVING DURING CONSTRUCTION. THE CASING SHOULD BE (TEMPLATE NOT SHOWN) REMOVED AFTER COMPLETION OF CONCRETING OR, IF LEFT IN THE GROUND, ALL VOIDS AROUND THE —111- • CASING SHALL BE FILLED WITH PRESSURIZED GROUT. THE CONTRACTOR IS SOLELY RESPONSIBLE 1 HE FOR ALL CONSTRUCTION MEANS, METHODS, TECHNIQUES, SEQUENCES, AND PROCEDURES. =I 4. FOUNDATION EXCAVATION SHALL BE INSPECTED PRIOR TO PLACEMENT OF REINFORCEMENT AND ANCHOR BOLTS. =III_ I—I 5. SPECIAL INSPECTION OF REINFORCEMENT, ANCHOR BOLT INSTALLATION. AND CONCRETE IS -111- ° REQUIRED PER 2000 IBC. FOUNDATION REINFORCEMENT AND ANCHOR BOLTS SHALL El o O BE INSPECTED PRIOR TO PLACEMENT. © -11 j 11 (12) #11 REBAR, L=21'-6" 6. REINFORCING STEEL SHALL COMFORM TO ASTM A615-87, Fy=60 ksi. REINFORCEMENT SHALL BE '� _. N N IN EQUALLY SPACED ON A ASSEMBLED USING STEEL WIRE. WELDING IS NOT PERMITTED. MINIMUM SPLICE LENGTH: FOR 0 55"0 CIRCLE No. 6 BARS AND SMALLER - 44 x 0bor; FOR No. 7 BARS AND LARGER - 55 x Obor. HORIZONTAL TIES SHALL BE STAGGERED WITH NO MORE THAN 507 OF SPLICES IN ONE PLACE. SILTY SAND Ma `� 0 7. CONCRETE MIX DESIGN AND CONSTRUCTION PROCEDURE SHALL BE IN COMPLIANCE WITH ® ri---7°N ACI 318-02, ACI 336.3R-93, AND ALL APPLICABLE STATE AND LOCAL CODES. 0 n- \� 0. MINIMUM COMPRESSIVE STRENGTH - 4000 psi AT 28 DAYS. USE TYPE II CEMENT UNLESS I. °- 11 STATED OTHERWISE. "- I b. CONCRETE MIX SHOULD HAVE A SLUMP OF 7" (±1') FOR DRILLED PIER AND 3" (±1") FOR MAT FOUNDATIONS. WATER © 4" MIN c. FOR DRILLED PIERS ONLY THE CONCRETE OVER THE ENTIRE LENGTH OF ANCHOR BOLTS SHALL II. PIER 0 = 66"--7 CONCRETE VER BE VIBRATED. FOR MAT FOUNDATIONS ALL CONCRETE SHALL BE VIBRATED. SECTION B B PF..0 PROp�.0 8. ANCHOR BOLT ORIENTATION REQUIRED PRIOR TO CONCRETE PLACEMENT. THE CONTRACTOR SHOULD �G CONSULT THE SITE PLAN AND MONOPOLE DRAWING FOR PROPER ACCESS PORT ORIENTATION. /6;#724209 ENGINEERED z,.o ENDEAVORS 57"0 OREGON °' EEI i 0 �G ��, INCORPORATED / �` 4).-- '3' '∎C, nt1 The Experienced Point of View �} / C ` 1 7610 Jenther Drive • Mentor, OH 44060-4872 / ` ��8�� ,ac, Ph: (440) 918-1101 • Ph: (888) 270-3855 Fe: (440) 918-1108 • www.engend.corn 66"0 O T—MOBILE 3 100'-0" MONOPOLE 72"MIN (24) /J5 REBAR, L-.17'-0" KING CITY PO-4037—C TIGARD, WA SCALE: N.T.S. PROJECT NO 12215 0 COMPLETED DRAWING 12/19/03 J G. SHEET 1 of 1 DRAWING NO 12215-100 REV DESCRIPTION DATE DWN CHK Reduced flan Set ��REDUCED Q° PORTLAND,N.E.DVIFNO OREGON SUITE NOTTO SCALD PORTLAND, OREGON 97232 1 .14;iiirmilik PHONE (503)81}9000 FAX 50})736-3014 RECEIVED ill JAN 2 0 2004 In VoicieSibeams CITY OF TIGARD PLANNIMEN LEERING VDCZI FA ,,,,„ 1 143,,SL 3,11 A,E VOiëi5tIIvn 01.74 200 vJ-,.,A fM 117214 Tot(5115)2}-7377 Iai•m�. I PROPERTY ARU TOTAL • 39780537.FT.0.9132 AC 10000% A - E7OSTNG UNDONE TO BE REMOVED o 35350.FT.0.0061 AC. oe9% SITE NAME: COSTING BU DING AREA • 3316 S0.FT.0.0762 AC. 534% PROPOSED NEW ASPHALT C1 4R AREA 13490.R.0.0031 PC. 034% KING CITY PREPOOSED PROJECT AREA 869 SA.FT.0.0199 K 2.18% PIEPOVSED FENCED AREA • 36150.FT.0.0061 AC. 0.88% I UN PREMISED NDONE AREA 36150.F E 0.0067 AC. 0.96% PARE PARCEL ET2 (PER DEED REFERENCE RUINER 67040529 OF THE DEED RECORDS OF WASMIGTUN PREPOOSED NEW DRNEWAY o 13050.FT.0.0030 AC. 0332 COUNTY,OREGON.) SITE NUMBER li PROPERTY STATISTICS M 9 AT THE AIEST OF A COWNGTONS LEASE ST"ROM WHICH TIN NORTHWEST CORNER OF UR 1e,FREIEON RAT _PLAT 2 AS - PUTTED AND RECORDED N VOLUME 6,PACE 26 OF THE PUT RECORDS OF WASHINGTON COUNTY.OREGON BEARS SIMI 41F16'S.5•EAST 114.77 FEET:RENEE P O 4 0 3 7 C TH NORTH 5033•56•WEST 1600 FEET:THENCE NORM 38'26'02-EFST 25.33 FEET. DOE THENCE SOUTH 503356•FAST 1800 FEET;11€ E SOUTH 3326'02•WEST 75.11 99D AM 0.0 Depart 1500 NE kviq SL PorOo,d,OR 97232 m IC Nriq St(Foal) FEET TO THE POINT OF BECNMIIC AND TERMINATING.OESCPoBED PARER. 09/30/0.3 8131M REVE1 96 yds 0.0 AM 0.1 Turn LEFT(North)aarta Romp 0.2 mi 1-84/US-3o CONNING 1156 SQUARE FEET MORE OR LESS 12/06/W IONNNf SE19ET1AL 9:00 MI 03 MW911 ordo I-54[US-30)(Flat)1.1 m 2S-ROUT ACCESS UTY EASEMENT f DE MON 992 NI 1.4 M V-H Eidt 2.6m oN orr0o Ramp 0.1 mi 39th Aw. 992 AM 13 Tun LEFT(North)oMo NE 39th A e 0.1 mi 25-FOOT AAT A Nq ON 13 EASTERL RIGHT-LION: 9:03 Ml 1.7 Tun LEFT CNN)onto US-30 Bus[NE Sandy 6th]0.1 M BE(iilIGN AT A PORT ON THE EASTERLY LOUR-OF-WAY LINE OE PACIFIC HIGHWAY (LEI HIS-PAT)FROM PLATTED THE N E OR E D NMI E ,P 0 FRElEON 9W AM 1.6 Bear RICA(Wont)lab Romp 0.3 a:F-64/115-JO HEIGHTS RE-PUT 2 A PUTTED ND RECORDED N MIME S 8,PAGE 26 CO THE 9:04 AM 2.1 Wp oMe I-84(U5-30)(Wet)1.7 mi PUT RECORDS OF WASIINGTON COUNTY,OREGON BEARS SOUTH 54•05'1•E481 5:08 MM 3e Tun off onto Ramp 0.4 m I-5/Solon 324.73 .6ET; DT RE SOUTH 5031'09•EAST 197.19 FEET;THENCE ALONG 182 ARC 9:06 AM 111 limp onto I-5(South)74 mi OF A 44.77 FOOT RADIUS HENC CUM THE CHORD OF 10.75 FEATS NICE NORTH NewAY 11.6 K 1-5 ERR 294,tun off onto Romp 03 Psi OR-99W/Tgad/ EAST,H.76 REEF,THENCE NORM J926'D2•FAST 10.75 FEET;MFNLE NORM Newberg 9:16 AM 11.9 Merge onto 5R-99W[SW Borbur SAO(Wd)2.6 mi 5013'51Y COMMUNICATORS WEST 2 LEASE FEET 4 THE EAST BOUNDARY OF THE PONT DESCRIBED 9:20 AM 14.5 Mho 13680 SW Pacific IM.Portland,OR 97223 NORM 372&05 LEASE 2.50 FIND THERE NE 5005 1 UNT OF TERMINUS 6 NORM J326'OY FAST 12.50 FEET FROM OW SOUTINIEST CORNER CO SAD Rt,�N COMI UNICATDNS LEASE Silt N0. .NE DRIVING DIRECTIONS - LEGAL DESCRIPTIONS A faucucars Amt nAa Rlar CW n rnse any MR 1O0D vlrx ','7a�+9 : `. Oak St L t 1 AND 4550W105 LLC. MANE 71Y5 CRAVING 5 COPIRQTI♦D IT b D[S 80 nm rn-nm, ''� Prm 54 F KING Cm PO-4037-C PROPERTY OF THE OWNDE IT IS PRODUCED 217 ' -� 19910 SE VICTORY LANE T-1 GENERAL NFDRMATON i°'• �_ � 5T SNOT.pR 97055 SCREE FOR USE BY THE OMER MO ITS AFFILIATES - DI urn Kb M s¢r �-+ 1 h- TEL;(SWS)750-4667 � M REPROOIICTION OR USE OF 717 UUWWIC NA/OR NI �_ 1r -.M """`��» \ ;III FAX:(50.5)736-3014 C-1 1 EROSON CONTROL PLAN ND OEWtS THE J1 1) TION CONTMIFD N R 6 FORBOOD1 Ws. more ' �)r M-s 111717 MO 011)° rruv�cmnaaruo Ne Rai m SIM -1 , `l tp¶ No_ . I • TC 'WD FOR 9� PO�BO%L�194D 207 A-1 OYFRNi SE PUN WRIIWT THE NOON PETd8190N OF TIE OWIE7L INN Pte. t�"� gg'�� 3 { a 7 gyp PORTLAND,OR 97261 A-2 E14MCED SFTE PIAM �, .'1.1RE14204 91 .7^a!I•s' -1Ne- o ANDERSON 01HDW90 CONTACT:RCN AVON csa aye tr_ »m,-.' it .< (y MSS CUFTACT PM(503)625-4084 A-3 ELEVATORS N CUL MUM \\,''` 1430 SE 3rd AYE,SURE 200 me mraWrz n Dell. MUMS.ewe n., �y Teo �n �i,�. , . •'` F. �' PORIIINO,3 34-7 A-1 EQUIPMENT PLAN t DETIAS (: Q t, TEE:(5N 2.19-7377 use mum0) IP.Cia raver 1°C RAM:`SE 2.39-7237 A-4., EQUIPMENT DETAlS DOOM/051,0 "' '� �' t:,--a CONTACT:JON c8'M. F MA A-5 CONSTRUCTION DETAES l<1 N Q CITY o1n.• um= ° nuns, m a.ar sera. ,:, -rd,err •�, PRNCPN-MEMt R DOZON. DEL Damao NNIm tan rwlm .N -..d ; � �A. g 4- ) �I� L-1 LANDSCAPE RAN `� '' MC =W wW .Q,a . �'��..a `D, • / E ND6 STREET 7 T.319,E SJD SHEET INDEX SITE FAAIeE8 _ - - ROSEDlRO.OREGON 97470 ZONING CONTACT: 503 544-2429 JIM BARD k •,AAw)}R[ w J TEL:(541 677-9400 ( ) MR m No,, -' .11/. OK nN ± .,, �. T )-ry` .-1i FAO(541)677-94Ot CONST.CONTACT: (503)26717 7 1 F15HER f p�� /�,�•�/� ms. me1oW ¢J• d 11th :Off _ \ j-Yi"� 6§F j�IgE SITE ANIASIIOFI CONTACT. 267-1947 DU1 FOFtSEERG I PO-403f-V EBSICIAESCBEIIM OD .700 owra •O �"� a (206)226-0034 INKINEELBEfil 00 a,� O WA•. worm v3.34 7AMIrETs=-T- ', 1� �' VOP E7TREAM PROPOSES TO CONSTRI/ET AN UNSTNFED RA0•o DOOM 11,. ra- -. Y># { B - TFIECOVIWA4CATONS FACWDT COIISISTNG OF A TINE-SECTOR ANIENN LANDLORD SITE ADORES RI n amrr °�ufl u w .? 8 R"�-' Z,y �, ig UONOPE E A O T PREMIL RANSACTOR E IDEENT(6)M MOUNTED INSIDE E A 459 FENCED OW MI aW tin. r1Wam mA0. ` �`.: m _�." .� R . ,�,u. _,..__ . N 90 ENCLOSUE WIIN NETT LANDSCAPING SITE COMMON IV AO o e.e m ..- w ,. \« &W ARM PARCEL o0 13680 SW PACIFIC HWY N_•ru:,t A > "�,4 4f• 0. I.o9 AC 2510215 01100 ZUANG - TIGARD, OR 97223 r } • P W} • �p1��y.ry�a MECUM�� ppF��F��yy,pIyy�C{� RF ENGINEER _ 1 REVISIOII [100] 4009 NUMBER v.: 1 ¢Mn JOD)ON)ON J.4A50fCT A A PR1mWJCOmiGmWt - J ST 0. E NIO E /� 4> SEC ON o 3 E CITY i CAD 616 SO.FEET! UT Nu'25'15.Y PROJECT 1u 44059 SHEET 1111E TK ��x3'� LONG M 12747'00.6• 04 REFERENCE • Cf SOURCE:NAO 63 RDIIE7+cE 1.PARKING REQUiREMENIS ARE UNCHANGED OPERATORS GENERAL INFORMATION ® bi •4 Ent ''- 2.1RAf71C b UMMFECIED eI 01061ON RFFFRD4CE ,... p,a1,n, TVi1i1 J.=NAGE AT STE 6 PROPOSED MOON MANAGER - - ., R •W SIETE WWI ABBREVIATIONS & SYMBOLS VICINITY MAP N.T.S. TEAM PROJECT INFORMATION APPROVALS T-1 PLOT 901LE.• 1:1 - 4,2, DESCRIPTIONS PARENT PARCEL ••T.-Mobile e 1501 N.E[ROW SIHttl, SURE 530 Ni (PER OODEED REFERENCE NUMBER 87040529 OF THE DEED RECORDS OF WASHINGTON COUNTY, PORTLAND,�OREGON 97232 �Q � COMMUNICATIONS LEASE PREMISES: FAX 50333 232-0519 BEGINNING AT THE SOUTHWEST CORNER OF A COMMUNICATIONS LEASE SITE FROM WHICH THE '�' NORTHWEST CORNER OF LOT 18,FRELEON HEIGHTS- PLAT 2 AS PLATTED AND RECORDED IN many POE C2I30 ti� MTV POLE 1Fnu.1 VOLUME 8, PAGE 26 OF THE PLAT RECORDS OF WASHINGTON COUNTY, OREGON BEARS SOUTH Land Mark . F4 6/b' 4918'55•EAST 114.77 FEET; THENCE NORTH 503358• WEST 18.00 FEET; THENCE NORTH SURVEYING INC. 392602• EAST 25.33 FEET; THENE SOUTH 503358• EAST 18.00 FEET; THENCE SOUTH 3926'02 WEST 25.33 FEET TO THE POINT OF BEGINNING AND TERMINATING. DESCRIBED PARCEL . . Stepns Street CONTAINING 456 SQUARE FEET MORE OR LESS. Roseburg. Oregon 97470 • Q 25-FOOT ACCESS AND UTILITY EASEMENT DESCRIPTION: Tel(541)877-9400 BEGINNING AT A POINT ON THE EASTERLY RIGHT-O-WAY UNE OF PACIFIC HIGHWAY(US HIGHWAY Fos(541)677-9401 99)FROM WHICH THE NORTHWEST CORNER OF LOT 18, FRELEON HEIGHTS- PLAT 2 AS PLATTED AND RECORDED IN VOLUME 8, PAGE 26 OF THE PLAT RECORDS OF WASHINGTON COUNTY,OREGON? BEARS SOUTH 540519'EAST 324.73 FEET; THENCE SOUTH 503109 EAST 197.19 FEET; THENCE ALONG THE ARC OF A 39.87 FOOT RADIUS CURVE, THE CHORD OF WHICH BEARS SOUTH 831827% EAST, 44.78 FEET; THENCE NORTH 3926O2 EAST 10.75 FEET; THENCE NORTH 503358' WEST _If 12.6�t 21.27 FEETTO THE EAST BOUNDARY OF THE ABOVE DESCRIBED COMMUNICATIONS LEASE AREA AND THERE TERMINATING SAID POINT OF TERMINUS IS NORTH 3926'02•EAST 12.50 FEET FROM THE '~ / lb • SOUTHWEST CORNER OF SAID COMMUNICATIONS LEASE SITE. aE1 N. •\ / BUILDING ROOF 4/ / - • // El.295.09• \X N. �' lr many Kai'12.301107-Ali\\. U \ ` e N dr* N. CEDAR\N. o \''''%. / N \\ N. N , ,,,,a i)104. \ :h ' MlE �� \ \•\\\ - :'N \ \ �•r ' LEASE PREMISES DETAIL sr ..r-117 \\ \ \ \ • \\ I o 9I Nat 1A.bR„d.d 46Z3't1.Ot•, ME NNE taw OlY PI...da lodge) N Y. \ \\ �, Waft ors mom*. NMI X274 X46•. !R MJtIF]! Po 40370 • \ df�pdty I,arb.,IM7t and RTu.R•/../M.,M 275. 11!A001E]S 131111°3E►.Hn.I.�,.or IEV1mC \ ,.$,s hot/IMO 1111(SS)I.aewat•t.MOM TOOK OR 07261 In SATE C ` , \ �� , �,� !29 h.2. TRM•Td...d.,,e..bxotIon N. \\ fC ewd A+vK weld.1 S I h.t••NAb o0U 3 NwE. Toed re.er.lodge No Q' • •, � O ^ '_ /�\\` \\ .'91}11.,).M a.tol doM..ios oaa..) OWES AoaesW P.O.s.7�wea • • jrYC /' - -/ \ M 1983(MAD-413).W...Anal a Tlyvd OR.72111 ©• • \\ / N. \ /y'' /\\ v 1. ,d w•••••a.d}(�1M ASSESSOR'S PARCEL NUINER(M ROINSO4 N / \ v.tb/sMUn )w 1,t...._ ` / N. 2.M North Mr{mi 148./Datum M IET AREA OF UNCOILING PMMCEL(S)c 1.0!An \ [ \ / 199!(99)..d..d.1.,n9ud to 2.A• ORO 1:54771 • N \ $ \\ ,...M fiat NET MCA OF PCT M!X 1.593 9q R. IA1Tfl :E ..4. �� \'/\ \ OIOIRD HtVAIIOt 273 NAVE 911 THIS DRAWING IS LIPMRIOITED AHD IS TIE So.E L $ 11ERGOIE2y4?03.-: -----' \ \A.*_• A. A PROPERTY OF TIE OWNER. IT IS PRODUCED V 11p1pYAR10 Ilo i Y.a.n.,t•0 440 MELT FIR USE 9T TIE SIED/ft ITS NFHITES `T!\ \ RCPR®ftTIOI OR USE OF THIS DRAVDNG AND/ER `Q\ \,* MARE OF R1111EY01! PARK A HEMMER BASIS OT F1FVA71014 NINO 94 M.E&II...,,.N 1IE DFD91111 ESINTAPES IN N IS FORSIDDfN GRAPHIC SCALE 41\ �. )d TE�RAl1oN Nn 17)7 _ •L1N>• VNIOIT TIE WRITTEN PEIMISSE71 IF THE OW NEIL �,�1 'r M ........"•••"11S...., '�;�\�\\.14.4k, me LATITUDE & LONGITUDE °A"0F°EA1°i07 n,tM 7s SITE NAME \\lit 4 '0,, SYMBOL DESCRIPTION COSERVA NAT NM STATEN(1 FIB) '4 NA $�►Ad' • FOUND PROPERTY CORNER 1.LA1t I1 541. Mac*I deb•90 12. N a? • GATE CORNER 1.LA��¢AREA 010110 ELEVATION TA IDI AT coma S 69'03'35 E 106.8'1 ` FA 6/11•R D -+ uTUTY POLE 54TH GUY ANCHOR 0 O O O jO O -0 e O 6 e e e e O m TELEPHONE CLOSURE BOX S.VAECIIC NOR1N DECLINATION t?4O AS PLPER BY 99 l FIRE HYDRANT MATKIIK GEOPHYSICAL DATA C4N1E7t(10011) SITE MINTER I Se MO SPOT D.EVAS1 IN O YaY 5478 AT LEASE CORNER 3.1q!SURVEY 00E3 NOT CONSTITUTE A BOODMY RIMY OF THE I PARENT PAROR MOMI,EIIA a RECORD wFAE FOLIO AM HUD 1 I •v Ni 1... AZIMUTH MARK PROI PEDRO.FOIMAT01 MEND MUM)YOMR/RTS FOR COMM. 1 I I • 7112•HUB REFERENCE I I I .-..p -PROPOSED POWER LINE 4.THE WAVE OF TIE ERRING U1UTV.ACUTE!HAS NOT®1 SITE ADDRESS PROP.UNE PARENT PARCEL M THE WA E CONTRACTOR MALI.CONTACT 11E HAS N T E V19ITY COWRIES TO OSTAR HOMO=REDMDMO ENACT DEPTH LEASE AREA UNE OF AARIAL AND HOROONTAL LOCATION OF UNITY LIES PRIOR 70 13680 S.V. Pacific Highway I I I 9C.2') RECORD CONIFER INFORMATION 11E TITI O UNDERGROUND UTRI mFORNOR 1 4 TREE-cOHPER EMSTUIEIE OF RIRED°SECTS MI01 ARE NOT 9HOr•I ON OD LAN. Tigard, OR 97281 I I I TREE-DECIDUOUS •E1091101 EASEMENTS,CIORIRNICES AID OICEIn10N9 NAYS NOT eusH-SHRUB NAP RE>EMC ED. RE MY HAS FURNISHED SHIT TITLE PRFII RIMY TITLE ISPCRT ISSUED BY FRST AMERICAN 4RE UNE TABLE i i loan aIL I 1 A"� mMO.""S'M�O, M TOPOGRAPHY SITE SURVEY A591RES NO FOR CORUGR ITFL9 THAT ARE UNE LENGTH BEARING % % I I NOT REVEALED N SAD REPORT. EXCEPT=RI:FIRMED PI DIE / REPORT ME AS FOLLOWS Li 10.75 SOB'E ) ��//� I / I IMI 3-AOORESPS UNITED ACCE'33 PER WOK 334 PAM 3N L2 24.27 MED L<14 ITEM 4-RETER LIE EASEMENT PER 1100E M7,PACE 004 CURVE TABLE I I I ITEM 0-PPFUE C• *PER BOOK erl.PACE 1117. SHEET NUMBER• CHORD CHORD CURVE RADIUS LENGTH L �� LEGEND SITE INFORMATION 1 OF 1 C7 39.67 44.75 56316'27•E_ 42.44 I , l ROT SOME t•=20' L J • \ \ NOTE: �� 1500 N.L NNINC SUO.LE, SUITE 530 PORTLAND.jOREGON 97232 NO WETLANDS, DRAINAGE WAYS, WATER BODIES OR RIPARIAN CORRIDORS PLgFE ` �eta 9000 FAX 503 736-JO14 WITHIN 200 FEET OF SITE. ————PROPOSED NEW COMMA T ALL EXPOSED SOIL OR STOCKPILES SHALL BE SEEDED AFTER CONSTRUCTION — — — EIOSINO CONTOUR(TO BE REYOED) OR IF LEFT EXPOSED FOR MORE THAN 7 DAYS. STOCKPILES SHALL BE SURROUNDED BY SILT FENCE INSTALLED 3-6 FEET FROM THE TOE OF THE —PROPOSED SET MOW PILE. "/AKRON SOWS OIRECTOI OF ORMFCE NOW - NOTES I 5 NOT USED 12 MULL C M EON°"""" PROTEGEES PER DETAIL '� 7/C-1-WINT SDI PROJECT S' 4./^, 1.ATTACH THE FILTER FABRIC TO 2.BACKFILL AND COMPACT THE ••• POST ANO EXTEND IT EXCAVATED SOIL. / • • }/ji! INTO THE TRENCH $ \-00S=ASPHALT li '/. / , / /' •• 'r10' • EXTENSION THE TRENCH FABRIC A / ,A r I" . /30/D3 mlre RE0\ 4 41>A4' 11/011/03 mire MOW•♦ ��i�.,� i�I/ I. mi.mac NO W1FR425 S,4•LL E N ALCOMIIXC NMI-mix WATER smear / • .D L \1\',,. 0110 MECUM DESIGN AND DEVELOPMENT STAIDNOS,OREGON STATE EN.a / • r .> -.9.,,t9,,,��-/-e�....-�• 1RNISPORTATION/NRRCIN PUBLIC WORKS ASSOC.1968 STAIONe) KATICOG FOR 27d . , . -.tea _ ROAD.eRIOGE AID AARACwAL aX6NDCTMI AND TIE CURRENT aOOT MONK= LV, • . fir .. '!�C�CL.474� r4,47?„-_ PORTS A SHOULD BE HIGHER THAN PONT 13 MMUS= \ M4.• '•, -1 ++ fi \'``�''�'N''��.*\'' PROPER P EDIE11T aF L N ORTO DRS PROJEC fAl1�BJECT CIION BF THE \ .•• 1 ;; •1 �� '' i \ �` FLIER BARRIER N DRMNACf WAY \ .• j1/ CPSIRUCII°H TIE CONTRACTOR 94•11 CONTACT THE COINT''SPECTOR ro N \ ‘N, . S,,. ♦ 4 �� B TIRNAFL N C Ntd EQUAL) SCHEDULE A NE�aETRLKTgN LEErNO lA` • ,, \ is •%4; CRAD�IG/TESC N04ESc p` `�' ' 1. TESL CONTROL OWES 9W1 BE CONSTRUCTED PIM TO ANY CHONG CR ■ VI \ 421110��/1Y` ,~ \ In r=11111111 LAID=ARM N ACCOIOVOF NM THE APAIOYED 1OLPPINTT , •K Y' ►� T►` EROSION/SEDNORATON CONTROL PLAIT THESE FACBTJES MUST LIE SAIISFACTENLY `\ \. \ �'a _ woman LNTL CONSTRUCTION AND UNDSFJPNG 6 COMPLETED MD DIE \ 'k A�. , ` }'a A_ SILT FENCE DETAIL SCALE WS 1 6 POMONA FOR ON-9IE EROSION HAS PASSED. . _ !• • ', A_ 2. M1 MIND 9421 COMELY TO DOPIER 33 OF DC UIFORM MONO COOL ■N • ,,,,,f;,..,, J�� : • •/-7• 1 �"!LI' \ T16 CROWS 6 COPYRIGHTED NO R ME SOLE f .,,,4 SCUP FOR USE 611,N1 DFIQ ND R5 AFFLICTS. 3. TERPORNR'DIOSON/57LTATION COME DISC)MEASURES SHILL E NSMIID N N • / PROPERTY OF THE OVER T 6 PRODUCED PRIOR TO ANY WE WORK 1TC \\ •• • ,' „ RFPR0011CIION OR LRE E 116 DINING NO/Ot MAY BE USED SNORT TERN 4. ALL STEELS 5421E IOW CLEAR OF DEBRIS AND ONT.STREETS 9421 E SWEPT \\ \ • •/,/ ASPHALT ACCESS / WIDOW 111 WINTER PENfID0l1 OF 111 OREIt PHASE UTUrY WORK AOD W/OO OF DEVELOPMEOT ��. MEDIATFIT AMEN ONE INS BEEN DUCKED OIIfO PAYED SURFMXS \ �,\\\ •• • , 4 Q \ , . 5. IN TEMMICE MO REPAIR OF TESC MEASURES SHELL E CONDUCTED INIDNELY y` \\\ / /' • lA SRI NNE I ;pii_ ..�., UON EOOCNIN A ONE)/OR TESL MEAAXES BO / 111111 I i .i', , .I I . 4 nCeIT TO ONNSIEINTENY.5 AHD SI PUSS TO PROTECT DE END RE SITE SHALL RET SEASON GROOM NOTES: \\ /C Fula PER /' KIN CI CITY LETAE 6/G-, . .-. 1. THE COSTRUCTgN SEQUENCE SHALL E HOOFED TO MNRDC TIE AREA OF UNMARRED Y 1111. SOL A 1111MA1 OF 1000 SONS FELT OF DIRT WILL E EXPOSED AT N / STE NUMBER CATCH BASIN AREA DRAIN PRY \--DOSING AwwLT 015 ors 2. EMRd AREAS THAT ME SIBEET m=maul=G 9]611115°USW STORE \ ENMIS AND WERE ORM 1IOVUMO11 6 NOT NEIIOPMED FOR 411 HOURS SHILL E / SWlEJgD WEN 4'NE Tlq(LITER O STRAW MULCH,OR COVERED WIDE PIASIIC / rV1VVF� • SEEING TO PREVENT SOL RUN-OFF. ii ] NEE NAKAL 6 NEAR(IRAlML HERD ENOUGH ro ro PRODUCE SE011OT v Icy RUN-OF FROM EXPOSED DA.ML EXPOSED EMTHNONL SEl E COVERED NO \ SITE A0011S5 . I,A 6Y ..:__:, flow OIFOt lXNSIRUCR011/CMS 5421 OCCUR ON PERNOLIS SURFACES EOM / ,'f� IIRGGI PERODS LY WAVE RAIL \\ (PROPERTY AREA TOTAL - wean FL 01132 AC.10ODNT _.------' ■,I i j FIOw ETCH BOTTOM - 13600 SW PAC= NWY 6axiti,/ I _ ' EROSION CONTROL RA! NARRATNE ----WING JAroaPE TO E RET101co ss�sa n.aca�T�e�6e9s I. LIE MATT SITE 5 LOCATED AT 138110 SN PACIFIC HNY,1X610,OR 97173 THE — _T TIGARD, OR 972.23 E7fI5TNG BIIRDFK�AIE7L JJ,eso.Fr.oFr.ome=Ac a34R COSTS SW COMMON 6 RANTED UNDSCIPE NCR A TEELL DRANK SOL TYPE SURFACE ONDIT G6 MD DESTRO TOPOGRAPHY NOME TINT ON 116 SITE THERE 6 PROPOSED NEW ASPHALT AREA - 13450.FT.0.0031 C 0342 N A ROPE.TNDE b NO NNGTION OF SDPDNK WATER OR 111E MFRS MO THERE SECTION A—A ARE w RETMDS ASSOCIATED NTH TIC SELL TIE 91 APPEARS TO GRAN YUIT PLAN PREPOUSED PROJECT AREA - SOSO.FT.0D,99 AC. LIEN FAST Me TIDE R NNE LIME,FOIS3IDIT a N R OVER TILE SIMACL THE �;` / SI6f u DITCH INLET WEFT RIOPER ORN4•GE SO El'5 BE TO E RF RNOLA DACE .\ PREPNISED FOXED AREA - 35150.F!.0.0061 At, 0.1111X D7S R PERCOLATE NIO THE CRUSHED ROCK AID WIPERS(LNG THE GROUND N'`\ PREPOUSED NEE LAOCCE MCA - 36150.Ft.O.00B7 AC. °.961[ EROSION CONTROL PLAN AND DETAILS \;s\' PREPOUSED NEW ORNDNT - 13059.FT.0.0030 AC °33% �'� 2. ENOSONJ DURING c0Na7RLAT10N1�FR U sI E FOR M OF `\ `\-` �'' a@r MINI WONG THOS RAC,EXCAVATION AND COVERAGE OF ALL nun TRDMES WILL •,` \ ` PROPERTY STATISTICS — /_ter' OCCUR NOM 46 HOURS DRAIN-CATCH BASINS SCALE: s 1 7 NOTES r 4 EROSION CONTROL PUN SCALE: 1/4•- 1•-O. 1 � G1 Nl PUS lGIL ,:, • 11991-75(POSER saacq MU 1fl PO `� Al 111%'1/4,44.,. re/2322,92(iElm SDURCE) •ie r ' GCA / y7A� 2 • 1500 N.E.O, SMELT, SURE 32 530 ffer / NINI' �\ POE? D.��EB 7232/' / ` FAX 503 736-3014• F705T1NG mow Ow) f I/ \ - N • ' PROP06ED UNDERGROUND N. , TF1C0 ROUTE • / / "..\ ; • 1.98 ACRES .` / • memo U/DERCROIRD / / / \ \. / - / /41, PARCEL M11�R .% // 2S102CC 01100 ��. 1.09 ACRES •` // .�". 'N; C. Zo cx sf dlq�skl w/ ■■ F LO00S1110 IMOD WY POIE 7y \ 100'-0'MONOPOLE SETB10( l 'aw ME /• _rai#4130602 \ PROPOSED UNDERGROUND •._ _-_ P.tlen4 a srn. Er /• PORER ROUTE �/ ��\ I /� F- !�A4FFIIF W Mr/\\ CENERUNE OF PROPOSED 2V-Cr i'.k ' , "[.Y� \ "CCU moon `` / - i' / ‘f.\ %■4( `PARIOIM ,• ..0.5. o `\ - / I ` : �: \\•, COSTING APoWTMENT 4f \ s . BI6ID6O(lYl)• N. PROPOSED wlasrREAM �o- ii" 4". / , `� �`TO y 10 A 22-6'X 15-0'X 6' •09. •` / • J \ PROJECT' AREA �/ / !p- N L C4-4 A SUB-SEE .� `r? �` - - -SIVIS /� �� \\y\•FCj \ C� A `s0�., �` SEE SHEET A-2 FOR ENLARGED SITE PUN i \ J 9)/ SEE 9EET E-1 ,� ` M� • / �` \9• \ N . �+ I Ole[ e � lir 99/3D/aT 2DIN.REVS / \ \ / �� ti `• 12/O6/N 2D1/C swum \`‘. /Aie4 j/ 25102 i SS \ N. �o TAW,�''� \+i PER VER1ZOIt 0.62 ACRES I 5' ,. '5 ' lb',.�� `� i / NOTE MOROIA110N IDS GATHERED FROM DOCIIMVRATXNN I O•'F �\ Y lipWRII' 1/ DECODER FROM 0IEUOR CITY OF TM:,P.c.ON I \` /1 1 DECEMBER 23,2003.PER OIT Of TAGND 6D/DOPYEirt 1 \•?/O �`_..• , tt. R/ 9a0r SFI. #6.7%.0/0,T6:OIARD4NIS CONCEI61N0 I '/i• r � y;%. �� EXISRNO B{AIDIMC '�1 \ � / 4P / 4111411141N4kllI'(Tw) +0Y1 /1 `�\ V -F+ R =100'-O•TAIL SfFFl J • RO•\ + 70 99 EFN 1160 tMA 1/2'RADNL L j N 50lF RR 11SE 90 11E OWNER O III RTixt¢CNISIERS.SIRUCI1AVL ICE 7511P11 AID A M1X DF(4) 7 / REPROOVCIION CR USE OF 11R ORAMI/G ND/OR THE INFORMATION CONTAINED• ``•` AN,LTSilS NO 0131631 a O '' `\ DE NIE MEN PEIIIO 9311 01 THE OWNER. YOIIOPOIE FDIRDATON,900994 0, `�. �BT GEOTECHNek OIIER.S. a // 4.•\ \ �• PROPOSED 2S-0.X 16'-0. I • MOM SRE N11E •5 VC:STRUM LEASE AREA I • GRA6S NEA . • 9 ; • 555 •N p i .r9�:347 1µ.%J46t(w N K1 N0 CITY , p 1 , o s's , 5 • ,s, H b i' N SRE WADER -------E--- o = _ a = _ _ - S 89'03'35- E 108.87 .. PARCEL NAl11RER _ -------- -__--_ 2S102CC 07800 I ( - - - T-- -- PO-4097� 1 0.62 ACRES I I 1 - 1 I I I PROPEITIY AREA IDUL . 3679951 R.0.0132 AC.103.0011 -- ------------ I WE ADORES$ 1EM�$ PARCEL IK11�R E�TNC IA1D01PE TO 99 RENTED x350.FT.0.0061 IC. 0.66% I 2S102CC 07700 2510200 01400 13800 SW PACIFIC WV I 0.62 ACRES I 0.62 ACRES 1 1 I Ex6TNG BUXD6IC AREA x165¢FT.0.0762 AC 1334: �Q� I N 11C.ARD. OR 97223 IPROPOSED TETI ASPIMLT AREA . 13450.FT.00031 AC. 0.34% I I �D ACRES I 1 PREPO0I5E0 PROJECT AREA 61651 FT.0.0199 AC. LUIS 1 1 1 1 PREPOUSED FRQD AREA 36151 FT.0.0061 AC. 0.661 4 I jjI 91117 9 1!E EM I PR POUSED NEN 1AFDC/PE AREA x151 FT.0.0067 AC. 0.662 I 4 4 OVERALL SITE PLAN TOTEM 1.ID INFORIN31311 ONLY 9 NOT I PIEroUSLD NOV p11.ER 7 1x50.FT.0.0030 AC oaxl I 1 ; I MU 901901 ALL 06E/BOIR OF WORK„ "PRIOR t PROPERTY STATISTICS _ I I I I R6H7._ 1 j 1 1 ' %J� %ill/_/�/1 1 % OVERALL SffE PIAIV A-1 SCALE: 1/16•- i'-0' � 1 2EBr 1bKB ,:, NOTES: I I.SITE PUN 6 FOR CONCFP((w 11FCRINTICN OW Na NOT TO BE USED AS I ''›e- POKER PROPOSED CONSTRUCTION DOC111ENR DO NOT SCAE;VERIFY ILL D,MDRSIONS. 2_WIRY ALL PROPERTY ME*FORMATION PRIOR TO OEGURON OF wax I C . U UNSAPE WINTER 11.1 1500 N.E.IFAING STREET. SURE 530 PORTLAND. OREGON 97232 I PHONE 503 813-9000 FAx 503 738-3014 PROPOSED LANDSCAPE 11 SEE SHEET l-t . I • � • •s • • J� •�� s I L 4 • / 1 ExaTBa MONO, (r,,,,, , ,,„,,,,,_,„. ,A„,„,,,,,, , . 1 /:TI`YI�� ((�j.,#l,Tl •i�- (i �(1� ) S 4 i 1 � (� t,1 1T () i 1 1 IWCFROOIRO _ Ems,. A•' �I flaCe Ming j�,4� 14 %/ ' : -g�.. ��__-� ..i0 � � ��AT AZND1*' . .%� UGT UMW II =I WA. viii iI',_ MIT:' _ _-� run m --- ---- - - ' ,.x ac a.mc• PROPOSED C-B' Z porllooR OR MO 1 nFT7n IM raw I PROPOSED(8)COM ir PROPOSED UOILESMENI POLE NnflBM.t 1 Rrao Ea11PN E IT ROROEO [ID W ] !10E A TO A 70-8'x,S'-0"x 8' R CR CONC EIE STAB-SEE i SHEET A-. r I s I ' j .�PMA . ❖....• ........... .. .... . .. .. . . . 4. 1 te411 iihm..._ p O /i ..w �i i►�L❖4.4wo ►•i•.O❖.❖i►0►iAA01 •.•Powmo•i•.O•Oi►oo, • 44'1' 144 / A r,.410 14C:*:::.❖.❖.•.•.0•.•.•.•.❖O.0:❖.❖.•.•.0•.❖.❖.O•.•.O•.•D. ,. g 1 ICA'. •i•••i��i i►i.4!.\•♦.♦..�.\�..e� ��.e.�.�.l....�....�►OOi►A�i•.4i 00/30/03 ZOEIO RENE1 1 PE{ 1 $°,4iV4. T 1 j ,�of y lya/DS nn.NG suwnTAL U 1 ,` �1) i i li 1 PROPOSED tar-o TALL srm (f l,�'I PROPOSED cPS mimeo +m 1O WFI RBe L D,t 94 4• I 1 a l'■ �: �I ICE•75 MPH AND A WE DE(4) I I v.4 Mgr .�4 1 CANISTERS.STRUCWIRAL AiMLrss Na DES= \ I • •. 1 T ' � macaws Wf CRIERS.1 I 1 1� TALL ROODB•� SUPPORT MINN II :. `j`y v!�i g __ OCR Ilb 11 W PROPOSED COMORO*/MEIFR i►WM • ‘ A!r 8117,L_ m .___j_,�/ -• .l , ° I�- \ -\ • `, I � '��1-. - —T , !1'i��J �' !/',.-,-eRli _ _ �II • PROPOSED WROpB "_ \ (/ ('. . ; 7 �- ((,�/,. , ', �, �� PONOt/fUD sRRPORf uaNET 116 a1RNIC 6 CCPISINTIED Na 61DE sat Ng& PROPERTY OF THE OMER. R IS` I ;,`/.` J � E`�Jl \ (L-Jl'/ PwPOSD B'a1E • REPRODUCTION U °M"BCPRt OR S`` �: SLEET NOR USE BY THE ISM MD 115 FRAM Y \ PROPOSED BOLLARD \ I 1 © ii J SEE ► OI51CUr 11[ EN P00169011 OF ME OMER. SEE® C.1 _ PROPOSED TIER PAD MORBIim �T- � �\� PROI'OgSfF0 95 D 2 AW-0'1ONCESIRFNN SITE NYE Y.N. \ IA\ EIFLIIBIAl TRANSFORMER PER ': _� �j �►' /31 LIM WIRY PRa,DSFD 1E(00 N-iRAIE .iw KIND CITY PROPOSED 1138200 1ELCO 0-116C \ PROPOSED NEW,OICESTREAM NLU I__ �. PROPOSED f1RUE N1U. III /OWLS ACCM srrE NRffR EE Y-td MLE T E 1 y-G'• CFRIER IIOIIOPDIF CE111ER 1 ,0•4 +, SUB 71•-4• 511E AOOTESS fE1BJM: 13680 SW PACIFIC HWY RENTING OWL \ 4'-0' �s',-d 11CARD, OR 97223 \ il. 4111111111W1 PLAN OW 1N(E \ ,y ENLARGED SRE PLAN S \ ` !@7 NUM A-2 ENLARGED SITE PLAN 9GIIE: 1/2'- 1'-0' ft noE BDIEC ,:, TOP OF ANTENNAS TOP OF ANTENNAS clik O 100'-0'AGE,+1- \ 0 100'-0"A .+1- --\.‘ f 1500 N.E.IRVING STREET, SUITE 530 ANTENNA RAD-CE/_ PROPOSED(6)WAD POI _AN_TENNA RAO-CON______ �PROPOS D(6)WAD POLE PORTLAND.PHONE 503)813-9000 7232 O 97-0'Al.+1- ----- MEWS MOUNTED INSIDE A Y •97'-0•ACE+1- ANTENNAS MOUNTED MOE A Y NEw 24'0 CANISTER TYPICAL OF FAX 503 738-3014 NEW 71'9 CANISTER TY'PN'aL 6 (2).SEF SEE BOTTOM OF ANTENNAS "7 ! / V'0 94'-0•A.+/- �BOTTOM OF ANTENNAS •94'-0'AGE+/- 6AitosV ri \\ ..]DSuL OAK - =Wel TwVVW 011 97714 - my J:(903)]•-]r) _ fad.(503)139-7327 IMP -- ,,,m, J,A.,-.can 1 PROPOSED 100'-0'TALL STEEL PROPOSED 107 0 -'TAIL STEEL MONOPOLE POLE MILL BE DESIGNED MONOPOLE POLE WI BE DESONED TO 90 MPH NM LOAD,1/Y RAWAL TO 90 MN WO LOAD,1/2'RAUAL ICE•75 MPH AND A MAX OF(4) ICE•75 MPH ANO A MAX OF(4) ANIUMA CANISTERS.STRUCTURAL ANTENNA CANISTERS STROCIIRUL ANALYSIS AND DE9QN OF MONOPOLE, ANALYSIS AND DESIGN OF MONOPOLE, MONOPOLE F1D9NDAININ,ANTENNA MONOPOLE FOUOATION,ANTONA PLATFORMS AND OEOTEO»ICAI PLATFORMS AND GEOTEQNCAL ENGINEERING BY OTHERS ENGNEINNG BY OTHERS ■YEAS OA1 09/30NI zCNNG RI E" 12/06/47 mac SUBMITTAL PROPOSED an ANTENNA-`9 v4IPMF RY/ld11 ©1=1111- I PROPOSED V9LESRAM EAI RA , E0111PMENT-9E SHEETS A-1 I A-4.1 A NEW 6-OP TALL CFDM A FENa ENCLOSURE SEE ©© N5 ORANNNG IS COPYRIGHTED AND IS 1K SOLE PROPOSED WV ! PROPERTY OF NE OWNER. IT IS PRODUCED UIIl1TY SUPPORT UCNI PEPRO MR N n TIE OOE)1 AND ITS ANTNJAIFR AHD SUPPORT COLUMN RFPROOI1C11Q1 OR USE Q TNS oRAN/NC An/DR eTHE N m FO MATTON CONTAN M FT IS FORBOONN 9 1111NWT Sf N6T1ON MORMON OF 1!E ONIER :- ------o-=- __ -_ _ _______ PRONOgD GPS AITu.A-1 E? 91E NM _===_?=_ /��■.. CONCRETE h-2500 P9-NO SPECIAL INSPEC1ONS REOIINED.AROLITECT OF RECORD • REQUESTS CONCRETE 70 BE h'-3000 P9 `\ 1500 N.E IR.4NG STREET, SUITE 530 BIMONC� PORTLAND, OREGON 97232 AXE (am)736-3014 I NOTE \ PROPOSED 6'-0'TALL MOOD U IU1/TFOR CIARTYNOT CPS ANTEMIA_9I 00 r X r MOLE-ATTACH M1H , FENCING-•©© �� ,/2'u BOLTS sw. �� _ .,• NOTOA'GEN 3'OUTDOOR \ CAPPED BASE 910E PIPE RADIO CABINET \ COLUMN-YTS Of-126(ICE 9PoDCE A 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 j��■■■■11■■11■■■■■�1�[-.��I IIIIIIIII IIIIIIltlt� iGi j \ T) ? �-3 _ 1TFD AV�E2)cd24 BPoDGESIFETY RI 11111111111111111111.01 .n� '�I OOR AT'PRO'A•D-NTS - ImI11II.liIIli111I1I1 ,_ \ GEIERA,DR r"171- AOLE 111=111 �- ' t- \ IND1 1/Y U BQ 51T fN� AEI Tj,��4$) 111'111111"■1�� Imo/I+OMEIlc e '-jl 91PP0RT GABNIEf sA KEWSKI ' •, 1.IfII I� \ MATNXNI POMEN/1ELC0 f1]•SE 20 ME RETANNC wML ... s41.Aa• IL'7 ¢s/� , 2'0 501.40 PVC CONDUIT TO i T•.4.Aa Iw PATH IN _I -LV �I��'�!jl \ CONDUIT TO 93U AND RADIO h • Tr.(6�tT►-m7 © Fes(503)23,-7327 II• 1 1 1 1 1 I LL , , TELL° I�I■.■1■1 1.1�� 2f-f'S 1=1=1 EAU B �� •.�. r ` POUR N PLACE CONfAETE - _ \/ // - _ _. J' \ EGUIPNFNT SLAB 0 2500 P9 g — 11-1 I I-1 I \/�/i r•r 1] , F•_r r. -` WAN REBAR 0 24'0/C EACH I I I-1 I I-111 v, •"r .i:1:!.!: :- ` ,' NT DRY ACROSS •••• FRONT pAY 111911-H 11=111&'''`rr / rirrr II I. ■- I I I I I I I F Ir11�'1 �/ :•••♦ ` —iii--iii--111--iii—= = = = //r//X VII-,...- - ::: W m I—I I 1=I I I=1 11=111 kr�. r r -' r -. r••'_r•rI gfr D AND'r . ,�� 1=1T1=-1 I I i I I I I I I I I I-_ __- .. ``,...— 1 _ —1�._L1�i111 J�lU___ L I = _-•-I 111=111=11 I-111=111=111-111—III—I. : ; 111-111=111-111-111=111=111=11 II I 1 II II 1 i'-2-1 11-1��`N _ _ _ _ — =1 I I-1►1-11�=111-1 1=111=111-1 I `.' ..: IN9'E CT E ARCHITECT O F RECORD ' ' • • CONC RETE k=2500 PSI-NO SPECIAL I■■■■■■■■ ■■■■■i Ella I I l l l 1 I I I I I I I I_ I l 1 1 I lI I I I I I • °�'"` ' ■■■■■■■■■ 1...111.1 ■■1 I I I f I l I l I I i l I I l l I l 1 I l l l l f l l l 1 1 REWESTS C ONCRETE TO SE k-3000 5 I as ANTENNA I■■■■■■■■ 111111111111111 # M E M O 1 I I I 1 I I I I 1 I I I I I I I I I 1 1 1 I I I I I I 1 I I I 1500 N.E BOMO 6EIi , SUTE 530 LAMAX iI ■■■■■■■■■ 111.111.1111 111.111.111111.111.11111.111.1111 i■■I 1 1 l I 1 1 1 1 1 1 I 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 I I P A D. OREGONW 7232 I■■■■■U■U■ E■■■■■ I■■■ 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 PT A RE M= UTUT/TA( Q . 9PPRT QUN SE e 11..1.1110111111111111 M I I I I I I I I I I I I I I 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 [ II I l l l l l l l l l l l l l l i l l l l l l l l l l l l l l l 1 1 I I I CAPPED BASE 90E PPE NE OE SUPP0NT ■ I I I I I I I I I 1 I I I 1 I I I I 1 I I 1 I I I I I I I I I 1 I I I I I I I 1 I I I I I■. 1 A1 1 1 1 [ 1 I I I ■ II ■■■ IIIIII111111I1I111IIIIII 11*ai 'iU■■ ■■■■■1 III■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■ ICE I1RDCE-(Z,N'woE .�... ., 1111■■142,wAK QROE I i 'INC ►.■■■■11__i1I■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■ ,ihiloollillIMIERaiii■:;..._ '— Rim::-*THAW w 11111111 y,■■, ■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■ ■■■■■■■■■■■■ ' Il-� � 1 : ■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■ 66EE TR�5�gN © ;IH11I 1■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■ D OW,SA I �� IIIII� 1■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■ T<Ind /� �I — .� IIII■ `1 !'■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■ _ —1 t I-1 I I—I I �� -qm 1■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■III-III-11 I_ ��/ I i■■■■■■■■ 1 � ■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■ i 1-111=111-Ill i/ /. ■► 11,1,... 1.1.................................. X111-111=111=1 i ` :. ,...... _. 7 " ■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■ 1-III-III=III �� , 7 ■ ..I�■■■..■■■■■■■■■■■•••••••••■■■■■■■ -111=111=111=11 , .-, . _ . .-.<: _ ..... ._:. _ ..:_: ___RIB■••■■11■•■■■■■■■■■■■■ -1 11=1 I I-1 I I 11=1 11=1 11=1 I ___'. I I=1 I I-I 11=1 I I I I ' III iii. II _ "''' "''"' =111=111-1 I 1-111= - - r1-1iIfi1 - . .. iETT:= -11" 9 .T 0D:11I I I l III 1 I 1=11 IIII t 11=1 I - - .:..., 1-111=111-111=111-111-111-111-111=111=11 . I I=111=111=111EI _--,X;5 x 111=111-11-111=111=111=111-11-1 11-1 i 1-I-1 1 1-111-1 -_ -111 =I 11-1I 1-111-111-111-I II-11-111-111-1• .A.-. . • I I-111-111-111-11 ,PLACE 'EEQIPI IT 11-111-111-111-111-111-111-111-111-111-111-111-111-111-111-11 _ _ _ _ _SLAB a 2500 PSI w/i,REBAR•__ __ ____ ___ IEIEAi 1-III-1 I I-III-III-111-111-111-111-111-1 - _ - 111-111-111-111-2 0AY==111-1 1 1-111-1 11=11-11-111-111-111-111-11-1 I I-111 111-111-a -III-111=111=111-111-1II-111-III-111-111-111-111-I1I-111-1I1-111-1I1-111-111 IIl II1l' III 1111-111-111-111-111-111-111-111-111-II-III-111-I1I-111-III-111- /. 2 I-III-1II-III-III-III-III III III III-III 1II-III-111-111-111 111-111 111 111 III-III III-IIl III-III III-1II-I1l 1I1 III-III 111 III III-III-III 111 ./.0. .......---- WEST EQUIPMENT SECTION : 1/2•.•r-0r I ' NOTE CONCRETE k'-2500 P9-NO SPECIAL INSPECTIONS REWIRED.ARCHITECT OF RECORD REQUESTS CONCRETE TO EC k'•3000 P9 / // NOTE U14HTY/T FOR LEGIT FqT / SH10wN1 CLAPoTY D-\ J A_ CPS AMENNA MEI PRCPOSED 00 FENCING-`T 0"T MOO A ©© GASPED BASE 910E PIPE .�1`�i A �6g' nIS DRAINING IS CORY/1300:D AND IS TIE SQE COIAN-YTS'i-116(la BILGE - PROPERTY OF THE OMER. IT IS PRODUCED 91WOT, /_- = ! - SMELT PCB USE 6r TIC OwlER AND RS AHRIAIFS IRE BRIDGE-(2,1,"IDE SAFETY ! r x r ANQE-ATTACH ram ■ TIE INFORMATION CONTMIED N IT IS FOR900D1 GRATED wAYE QIOE BRDGE I REPRODUCTION OR USE OF iHF DRAINING AND/OR o1AFN€ OR APPRO.ED-YTS 4`I 1/Y U.STY. I i ROHM TIE INITiEN PDNS9Q/Of 1!E OWNER. { /NB-C 71D GF/ERATTXI RECEDT141E d is NdOA• N r Q1,DOOR ! SITE NAME r x r NIQ.E-ATTAOI w1N I RADIO CABINET U BOJO •_° ; = — - - • I;g _ -_ ■■■■_• 1<I Nc3 CITY YARmrI PONER/IEECO 91PPONr cAaNET „1: '!;�■ 1111■■ 11 - mS Y/SIX{0 P1C CON w TO ��I' E!1 c��.. CONDIAFT;3/,•SEALTx#NT FTf7f ��wNl SITE i cABINE s colour ro Beu AND RADIO 6,0,_,x 1Y-0 x..m.PdIN N , _ P/- 4037C i Ae• / I t 1 � :;.) rV1v.7/ EACH wAY / FUTURE RADIO RADIO MU -(. I':-'/ � _ t7zI11I RADIO ={., \ 1 I I-111-1_ SITE ADDRESS 4 _ :T,:. :. .:..... .:. .: <'. ..::.:.:::'\\ I I l i-111-f 1 - .' .. .w T . -- - •:•::•. ��/ 111 111 11E1 13680 SW PACIFIC HWY .r.-., PF ...-... 11-I 11-f i I-111_ TIGARD, OR 97223 ��—�p.�, YQAITNG BASE; �•Y+ � ' �_•- •�1 4- •-PROVDED BY O,NERS AND -, .ti Y ., i . y`... ,._•'=111=111=11=1, -_ -_ t---�-1 � [I=-J11--I1�--l_u,..111--IJa—�I1--1 ::_ :L. ;.:-> _ - • : __ _ _ _ _ y �.� IJ • - � •� III-i I I_I 11=1 t I- 9EEFF TIE -III �� -��-111-1 I I-I 11-1 11-III-1 11-I 11 :' -111-111=111-111-111-111-111-1 EQUIPMENT DETAILS % ///////////A 11 I-111=111=111=111=111 111=111-1 11=111-I I I-I I4 'il 11=1 11=1 11=1 I a I 1=1 11=1 11=111= 1-f1E 1T-illvhTi-11 =II1=111=111=111=111=111=111-111-111=111=1 =111=111—II1E1I1=1I1=111=111=1 111=111-111=111-111=1 11-1 11=111=111=111=11=1- 111 -111E 1 11-111=111-1 11=111=111=111E111E111r11=-1 11=111=111=11 1=111=11 I-1 11—I 1 1=11 I I- T N UMBER --ilI -„111__„III,;,III„EIII_„fll, ,lll_„III,;,III,_„III_,T II��ll_ilII„11II,��IIIP II, ,IIl =,II1_„III_,EIII_,�III��TII11—„f1l III,_„111 „III, ,111,;,111—„1111-1 A-4.1 SOUTH EQUIPMENT ELEVATION SCALE: 1/2•- 1'-0' 2 IPEm x.YE ,, I SANDIN.ELO ES CPS ANTEMIA NOTES 1. CONTRACTOR 10 NOTIFY PRO.ECT MANAGER OF ANY DISCREPANCIES WTH 1 AH A_ PROPOSED LAYOUT PRIOR TO PROCEEDING. ARO AT/1/C-100. 1.LOCATE TO PROMOS 11E NICEST POS9BIE VIEW CF THE SKY 2. ALL PIES,BRADLEE,PATES,COLLECTORS AND MISC.HARDWARE TO BE • MOUNT USING SS (a TREE CR BULLING CAN BLOCK=NS FROM THE SAIELJTE) HOT-DIPPED GALVANIZED UNLESS OIHERM%NOTED. 1500 N.E. cPS MOW • SCREWS FRONDED N(ID PORTLAND, GOREGON 97232 BRACKET-5� 2 A YMRM a TWO FEET FROM ALL L1GH11ANG Roos. P 503 813-9000 INDUSTRIES les 316 OR ANTEHru CAKE 1. ALL AN1DNA AID COAXIAL ANTENNA CABLE TO BE Ftx6.91ED BY Vaal ARAM AND EOUAL - '/� TO RAO10 CABINET I CLEAR OF THE MAIN LOBE OF THE RF TRAHSNTTNG ANTENNAS. INSTALLED BY CpI7RACfDR FAX 503 736-3014 T5•TN PPE 10 PIPE MOUNTING 1 z MANNER�mOM TRUE NN AND CODED EFOINIoa WA ak NT-YTS PART�B-SRO — SECTOR ANIEIINA UMBERS 7KN-Caat LOGNG A6Ng6N OF 75S OR 270 DEGREES N ANY DIRECTI=I. / 0 2 DRECT UAL AIpNA SECTOR(1S) Al - 1 RED BAND KT BRIDGE ANGLE ■ / WA ♦ \ PANEL MIDNIAS 7 1 CON% le 2•.. STRAP CABLE TO PPE. (Q2)DNEC1K l MT /r T M - ,RED BAWDS ■ SNAP CABLE UDER • ANfLP ANTENNAS +=f ,�I Ia BRIDGE To RADIO OBSTRUCTIONS MUST BE 'TM \ a, I,.' I .• 7/r•ACDA�'(135) Bt - i BLUE BAND BETA CABINET aLow 1s DEREES �� 2 QREC11 A&/� \1�•TN'NFL AN Taus cµt SECTOR(2 551 Cl - 1 RITE BAND o.II ' 6 04 - 4 LIME RAIDS C 7:a CPS ANIMA % NOTE INAS READ I FOR 01w6 ST1E5 RISE 11E AD,BTq GN CaORCCODFS wEY S' TYP OF(6) 1-1/Y0 SECTOR 91ES (6)PAWL WOWS-(12)COAX RUNS SINVONED C LVANIED PIPE AROYAAT A100 .— SECTOR 91ES (9)PANEL ANEMIAS- 16 COAX RUNS 1 „ 0 .I /D STANDARD • BRIDGE 3 SUPPORTS 1'I EMT N 4. COAX SHALL BC TAGGED MTH COLOR WUTNERPRIXIF COLORED WILL TAPE,AT COONK ATT LLFDLOWER LOCATIONS/ NICE ioo w pirpAR WA = GALVANIZED STEEL n AT ANTENNA COINEC110N P>oloa,OR 97214 PPE-DALLY BI11RY.SEE /2 AT ENTRY TO EOUPMDIT CABINET re(503)110_131) • _A SHEET A-4 FOR I / S RUN COAXIAL CABLE MTM WNW t2•SUCK 12•FROM EDGE OF EOMIERT F•mc(.-eesiAn a. _ -- SPEW ED IIEYi1TS CARNETS,ACROSS MARE QEIE BRIDGE.UP YOM(POLE AND GSIRIBU 10 EACH EA ■ 90E N NN VIEW ANTENNA DENCE FURNISH AND INSTALL NIT STALL AM or(3)GROUND KITS PER COAXAL CAKE PER ELECTRICAL DRAWLS. VERIFY NUMBER OF ANTENNAS,CAME, AHD CABLE DO MEIER VAN PRC ECT MANAGER GPS MOUNT SCALE: N.T.S. 18 GPS ANTENNA SCALE: N.T.S. 4 ANTENNA AZIMUTH DETAIL SCALE: N.T.S. 1 B•-0•oc VAHIZED POST CAPS I■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■II■■■■■■■■ � PURCHASE AND STORE SPADE LAMP I 0(PPC CARNET. 1 7/6'SCH 40 GA _- _ - -' 1.6 BM TOP FENCE • 4'-G lY-IY OC CONTRACTOR TO SUPPLY All MATERIALS FENCE POST SET TYPICAL LEAF 7/6•SDI 40 FENCE POST 1 NOOD POST ADAPTORS (1 • VANffD POSE CAPS _ N CONC(DP) 1111111 ii 9T N CONIC(1YP) - EACH LATERAL) ATTAIN I 1a6 BCC(TOP WOOD SLATS 3 HIKE DUVET BOX BT- _ MAN 4-1/,•.Y CAN �• � w � \--t RED DOT AR1H31IAI BOLTS VAN WASHERS ■ 1■■■■■■■■■■■■■■Q■■■' ' .. — w/BLMK COVER 7-O•MAX _11 ' _ COUNTERSUE(•EACH LATERAL vi, FENCING SNALL BE B41ED TO I, t.6 Box rap FtNc GATE FRAME W SIMPSON'PRY WW1 _„ 1'A EYT-TAP T I E;DS;�DDS 5 �P,YE EA_a IA,ERAL) ATTAa(MD,_�R72�' •' SURE VENT CH ANIID w ATTAIN EACH HOOD SLAT TITH t N,A9��.S GALV L'OI1 1FR9RK 06/30/03 ZOITIIG IETEW SCREWS•EACM LATERAL TITH 2-1 5/6• TIFF S wow DECORA7IN: , 1 STOW-TYP TOW-MANTAN 3' Y.,'PT DP BINiE HEAD CALVN62ED e EACH ulEltAl _� 12/06/03 ENING SURE= ROOOIWT YODEL BASE 970E PPE ABOVE TRADE _ 11 SCREWS•EAQI LATERAL ,e]DOW RITE 120V ACT '■.. muss a ms=ROD AS ATTACX EAL71 WOW SLAT to 0 2.SA 601x BY RECEI,T BIX6K CalAM(ICE !� I \. .a\ \ REOINED MM 2-t 5/6' TYPE s LND NG CCRP.CR BODGE POST) _ _ 4 , 2 .. PT 7W 104I 56ALAR. YTS PART tIF-126 �.-. • I I RACAL IEAO GKVATERA r.tl Ayr ', SCREIM6•EADI U1ERK', ElI—I-11 /\/ :. •� I �^ ,i tl CVMOETE PERe� ' Z'.4'PT T19 iiiEXTF76WS7 GRADE I I i I=N\\�:/:n,.. tl nZ• 2. •1 FRESH GRACE I ■■■■■■■■■■■■■■I,■■' .\ \ SELF-TAPPING SCREWS �,_;_, , IEII _=HI III _�I IIHIEI�1 NMI III PAD COMAE-fE EOLIPMFHT 1' G 1 RECEPTACLE I I /.........;.:-..o....',r. 4;....r.....r....iJr r.r r:i........i:. :� YY —I II I I 1—1111 I` I�It I I _III `" n ®- r . 4BB BB BB - 1. u- _ I` no maw RLLC 1 Ate'. : 11 11-11�I 1-11 1-11 I I I-1 I=11_,I I I- I—J I I I J I FI 1=1 1�j;P:;,r. . ..`• ,`. z 11_UJ_JllEE.i.L .L U1-!—Lmw= I' I EI l 1=' ...` _ — I' } 'f .D.=_.11.�l I I I 11-111 , 1=11-1 I—I 11=1 11=1 I P" I III I I I' '� =1 C-1T 1i =1��T 71 1 f=1 — I I-1 I F-1 I H�—I III 11=I i' A'S roSOURCL - — VIII—„ ,—,,,_— -III—. I HRH(~ 1-7 1IFr'' THIS DRAINER 9 COPYRIGHTED AID IS 1HE SOIL PROPERTY OF TIE OMER IT IS PRODUCED SOLELY FOR USE BY NE OMER NW ITS ALEMATES REPRCOUCIIW W USE OF INS ORATING AND/OR TYPICAL UTIUTY/TASK UGHEcALE: 1/2•=r-o•19 FENCING 0 RETAINING WALL SCALE: 1/2•-1-o• 15 FENCE POST & FENCING SCALE: 1/2•-1.-o• 2 ,T°f”:CONTAINED PAINED I N ;001 ' TOW-MAINTMI 3 ABOVE(RACE 91E NAME 2-0 a M 3/,'GRAN ROD(-- ea IiII1/111III I 111 KINCI CITY SO MATERIAL-• ASPHALT:3'I /4•MAIL ■i H RIDM MY 0/C NDARD 6'.STEEL fwBSrl IIOPoZOITAL 97E NIN[#R b PPE.=CRETE FUED twao�EA IDYLLS 1'BARS PAINT WAN(3)COATS I—III EPDXY„ ENAMEL 20S 20S EXPANSION JONT A(PE SLOPE —I 11-I I:N/1\2:14141f:::117.■ r�T/�111/ TMG a se vw�• '•V/ r "STING III—III / r 9AB•3000 P9 w//, y m I RAN ■•••S , .�.7°1ja ", ,,,,•., ....tiA �/ _ REBM e:, o/c EACH WAY IN CASE OF 1BGA ALUMINUM AN EMERGENCY GRADE GRADE / ! : I.CHAMFER a GATE EDGE CALL 4��,//��. �• ��•\\ ��;�� U�/ —I 1=1 I I :.!'v:�:..: VOICESTREAM WIRELESS SITE ADaESS 11=;) I. -1 /�%:%� / I I-1111 — / ►.. •r� • �. ';--- 1-888-662-4662 b 13680 SW PACIFIC HWY I=II''1 1 II.II —III-I I 1 fi I. 'I 1. -PI M'X 1W I CONCRETE TREAT GRADED SPACE MAN /e 1 1• ICI •c,i i:i_ =F SRe No: PO 4037—C TIGARD, OR 97223 II. 4 I.:it RXTND APPROVED FILTER FABRIC PRAM I—III-I ,!ii i. Site NeTne KING CITY I=. ...( I': ,II.; TO ASPHALT PLACEMENT 11, III ;!. AID 1 l 1 9 IN •":11. .. .., 411._ `.', EXCAVATE MN.NECESSARY m 1-11 .,/l• — 4 —_ LROO1 ImED EARTH GRUB PROPOSED SPACE BED _ _ _ - =OK SOD.ROOTS,NO ALL —I 14 RFBM e24'D/C E 1'-6• SWEET DTLE UNSUITABLE SOIL PERF PVC FEE I-III I I I =CANTO Roa AND FA TER 111=111 —III— CLEAN 3/a DRAM CONSTRUCTION DETAILS PRONG 6•ILLIMIY 3/4 DOWN A WAY TROY III ROC( MINUS COMPACTED TO US SE -COMPACT TO NO CRUSHED CRU ACP LED ROCK BASE (6)N REBM LONOTUDLLAL-- X1-160 /,REBM 012.0/C— SHEET EM= TRANSVERSE A-5 BOLLARD sou: 1/2'=r-o• 110 ACCESS DRIVE SCALE 3/9•=1.-0• 7 RETAINING WALL SCALE: 3/4"=.1'-0' 6 SITE ID SIGN SCALE N.T.S. 3 P,u,S 1•1 \ I 37-C LANDSCAPE BUFFER • 0 1500 N.E WANG SLL SLATE PORTLAND. OREGGON 97232 8•-0• 4 21-0• , 5'-0• PHONE (503)813-9000 BIRTER LANDSCAPE BUFFER FAX ((503)738-3014 SYMBOL DESCRIPTION QTY NOTES: . r-0r von I) ALL PROPOSED PLANTINGS ARE DROUGHT TOLERANT. II OMPROPOSED NEW 1REE'NNE NO RRIGATION IS REWIRED. -wpm- NEW TREE FF•-'ACER 2) ALL PROPOSED PLANTINGS WILL BE WATERED BY LANDSCAPER %1PE MAPLE'-'MR OICIATUM'H•AM 2-r 4 FCR A PERIOD OF ONE YEAR FROM INSTALLATION TO INSURE ' CNICIATAF WWI fDIVER ESTABLISHMENT OF PLANTINGS 2-3 CALIPER ALL 0EBRIS REMOVAL IS TO BE DONE BY THE CONTRACTOR. ALL REWIRED CRO1N0 COYER PLANTS ND 9I8UBS MUST BE CF -- PROPOSED NEW TOME SUFFICIENT 97E AND HUMBER TO MEET THE REPINED STANDARDS ED•a't•NALT (r^-1 '1ESIERN RIDOCOENDRpf tow(3)YEARS CF GROUND MULCH(AS A 0UND COV R)MUST L(")) -•NCpOCDDRCN 303 BE CONFINED 10 AREAS UNDERNEATH RANTS AND IS NOT A L._, MA0RUPIRWM'S MNLON SUBSTITUTE FOR GROUND COYER PUNTS ..,- Siff 09N.a AT FUMING) 19 Pl O11YTNBC MUS FINLr BRANO1E0.FREES PLNiT1 NAALL SPACED AT 7-0'0/C 1W ZONES OTHER MAN RESIDENTIAL TOAST BE A MINIMUM OF(3)ITCHES PROPOSED NEW GROUND IN DIAMETER. COYER'EHERND Ctl61EY- 1 ,MOUSCALYODIp3' I---`-- --- --- --- - -- ---- I.•-+ EACH 9ff•if 0.G 2763(361 SO.FT3) EACII WAY C0IEIOIG ME • • • • • • • 4011A • S-0•LAN SCAPE BUFFER PROPERTY AREA TOTAL • 3978053.FT.0.9132 AC.100.00, • • • • • AREA }, EXIST=LAIDCAPE 10 BE REMOVED • 35350.FT.D0081 AC. OEM T I • •• •• •i • ��, • • • � � =- •i • i — ERSiNG MEDIAN AREA • 331850.Ft.0.0762 AG 8.34X • •__1-y . U.0!.04.e...■ . !'-- . �-. l`� , ^0.i 5��- "Lmg.,.6r /r R, PROPOSED NEW A�FIALT AREA • 13450.R.a0w1 A0. 0.34X I 4 • ` 1 * af1 tx?I'''1 'l iE l I !F...4$301�A,g.i S• c"�' '''.' OT - PRFPp15FD PROECT ANA • 9695 FT.0.61,AG 21Wi • 4`:.\Z `Tj �= Oj j"'r4 j j j` ►_AD`\ne, _ I PREMISED FENCED AREA - 35150.FT.0.0061 AC. OMR l ,.'' PREMISE D NEW LAIDCAPE AREA • 36150.FT.D0087 AC. 061 I t-."�I • rP'PREPOUSED NEW DRIVEWAY - 13050.FT.0.0030 AG 0.331 I j''1 EP • •1 • /PROPERTY STATISTICS I 1 • • NEW HEDGE'AFSIEN LANDSCAPE LEGEND N.T.S. 4 I IaI�. =P/ .. •....•..::•.%W.•..%•�:.:•.:::.:.: ...:.:.::.; • / s 0 0 1111/All j 9ff SPACED AT r-6'0/e I ME M.9E RANTING oETA. 7RS sHEEr G S CO/30/03 MN RENEW 1 r f. • s ie ► 011. N• 1 I VIRigri •�� PROPOSED NEW ME'PRE \ ••••J••• ••• •••: ••I :iii:iii:i:::i: MAPIF-'AQR ') .II i ��, CRMAM MIMOM 2-Y I .' GAYER 4■■ of \ • 0�\ '� PROPOSED NEW HEDGE ) l') O • _. •1 • 1:1::: a- r . MACROPHILUAr 5 GNLON •�' )' • • J_ Wt` Sff SPACED AT r-0.0/C \ Ca• ..., .,1„,:a� / i1 qh ELASTIC �Q�L • ' r � i ` , -- -- •PROTECTIVE SLEEVE . q, U ` U' , i / THTS MANNO IS ED� LEEVVE • , • '� ', � '•�\ nO°I , � -- / A • i . . '�� CALYCINCICES• . STAKES DRIVEN 24'0110 IA, ■ _-- UNpS1URBED 50E e`\\ a ,_Y -_-- - -- - ---- 0.0 EAOI WAY•17 �___� ----/ 91E NAPE (THREE IOCAnONS) -I t ,\;j \ AREA °11-11='1-11=11= / / "1 war / 1=11=11=11-V=11=11' CITY OF TIGARD Community Development Shaping Better Community LAND USE PROPOSAL DESCRIPTION 120 DAYS = 5/25/2004 FILE NO.: SITE DEVELOPMENT REVIEW (SDR) 2003-00018 Type II Land Use Application FILE TITLE: T-MOBILE WIRELESS MONOPOLE TOWER APPLICANT: T-Mobile Wireless APPLICANT'S Tigard Lodge No. 207 of AF & AM Attn: Jim Barta REP.: Attn: John Havery, Secretary 1500 NE Irving Street, Suite 530 PO Box 230184 Portland, OR 97232 Tigard, OR 97281 REQUEST: The applicant is requesting Site Development Review approval to construct a new wireless communications facility consisting of a 100-foot monopole tower and BTS radio transmitting equipment cabinets mounted on the ground adjacent to the monopole. The proposed lease area will be placed within a fenced enclosure. LOCATION: 13680 SW Pacific Highway; WCTM 2S102CC, Tax Lot 1100. ZONE: C-G: General Commercial District. The C-G zoning district is designed to accommodate a full range of retail, office and civic uses with a city-wide and even regional trade area. Except where non-conforming, residential uses are limited to single-family residences which are located on the same site as a permitted use. A wide range of uses, including but not limited to adult entertainment, automotive equipment repair and storage, mini-warehouses, utilities, heliports, medical centers, major event entertainment, and gasoline stations, are permitted conditionally. APPLICABLE REVIEW CRITERIA: Community Development Code Chapters 18.370, 18.390, 18.520, 18.705, 18.730, 18.745, 18.765, 18.790, 18.795, 18.798 and 18.810. DECISION MAKING BODY BELOW: ❑ TYPE I ® TYPE II ❑ TYPE III ❑ TYPE IV DATE COMMENTS WERE SENT: FEBRUARY 10, 2004 DATE COMMENTS ARE DUE: FEBRUARY 24, 2004 ❑HEARINGS OFFICER (MON.) DATE OF HEARING: TIME: 7:00 PM ❑PLANNING COMMISSION (MON.) DATE OF HEARING: TIME: 7:00 PM II CITY COUNCIL (TUES.) DATE OF HEARING: TIME: 7:30 PM ® STAFF DECISION (TENTATIVE) DATE OF DECISION: MARCH 22, 2004 COMPONENTS RELATED TO THE PROJECT AVAILABLE FOR VIEWING IN THE PLANNING DIVISION Z VICINITY MAP ❑ SITE ELEVATIONS Z IMPACT STUDY Z SITE PLAN ❑ GEOTECH REPORT ❑ TRAFFIC IMPACT STUDY ® NARRATIVE ® TREE PLAN ❑ OTHER: MISCELLANEOUS STAFF CONTACT: Morgan Tracy, Associate Planner (503) 639-4171, Ext. 2428 1 A CITY OF TIGARD OREGON December 18, 2003 Jim Barta do T-Mobile Wireless 1500 NE Irving Street, Suite 530 Portland, OR 97232 RE: Completeness Review-T-Mobile Wireless Facility, Case File No. SDR2003-00018 Dear Mr. Barta: The City has received your application for Site Development Review (SDR2003-00018) to construct a 100 foot tall wireless telecommunications facility in the Shurguard Storage site. Staff has completed a preliminary review of the submittal materials and has determined that the following additional information is necessary before the application can be deemed complete: 1. Neighborhood Meeting Minutes and list of attendees. These were omitted. 2. Construction Cost Estimate. A general calculation of the project cost is needed. 3. #10 Envelopes, stamped and addressed with current property owner mailing information. NOTE: Labels are only valid for three months from the date the city prepares them. 4. The application plans shall indicate the percentage of landscaping and the percentage of impervious surface on the site. 5. Structural Report regarding the tower's fall zone. 6. The Site Plan shall indicate the vision clearance areas at the intersection of the access drives as prescribed in TDC Chapter 18.795. This is a separate matter from the AASHTO sight distance certification that will be required following the decision. 7. Narrative. The narrative lacks responses to the criteria found in 18.360 (Site Development Review), and 18.810 (Street and Utility Improvement Standards). I do not foresee a need for lengthy responses, however, some response is necessary so that staff can make adequate findings. 8. Submit 11 full sets (forms, narrative, plans-which may be in reduced format, and other documentation) of all application materials. The following issues are not a matter of technical completeness but are questions that will need to be resolved. The application notes that the equipment 13125 SW Hall Blvd., Tigard, OR 97223 (503) 639-4171 TDD (503) 684-2772 cabinets do °n site? h�°t emit noise. plans ind; T narrativ Are indicate the the pole states th A/C units or ► Once t e access to the psi t painted t he monopole w ll beergency generator e indicatet he access information will be grave. T the building reflective ir cepa going to regarding begin This will color. gray b be 639-4171, tha lettr rh o formal rev.submitted be required to b°, the do plans e e extension 2428 your application, process.staff will dee e paved If m Sin ely, please don't he t have the application M ate to costa t mtions Morgan Tr eat Associate Planner S13R2003 oDO18 la ni:icurpinlmorganiworkspacefsQ'Use Fsl� drisgr2003 00018(t mobile masonic lodge)Isgr2003 00018 in complete 1.doc LAND USE APPLIC*ION Project:5; z4I473'00040 7'/4.intc Date: 11//V/03 COMPLETENESS REVIEW ( i COMPLETE INCOMPLETE T QIDARD INFORMATION: Deed/Title/Proof Of Ownership e> Neighborhood Mtg. Affii It, OitIM ist Of Attendees r1 Impact Study (18.390) IY( USA Service Provider Letter Construction Cost Estimate 101 i___# Sets Of Application Materials/Plans Qt/Pre-Application Conference Notes Envelopes With Postage (Verify fount) PROJECT STATIST Building Footprint Size ./ ]) %Of Landscaping On Site % Of Building Impervious Surface On Site Ilr Lot Square Footage PINS DIMENSIONED: (� Building Footprint ',5i: Parking Space Dimensions(Include Accessible&Bike Parking) ruck Loading Space Where Applicable [ti ' Building Height • Access Approach And Aisle fiL _ �, Visual Clearance Triangle Shown D TONAL PLANS: �iicinity-Map [� Architectural Plan (� Tree Inventory �/ xisting Conditions Plan Landscape Plan (,�� S . lr Site Plan Q/ Lighting Plan PLAN/MITIGATION P ,N: J .L ... L /,L l L •G ❑ ❑ OW pat. awl ❑ ' I 1 ITIONAL R PORTS: (list any special reports) C7 sfivt n( ((port- ❑❑ - ❑ - - ❑ RESPONSE TO APPLICABLE CODE SECTIONS: ❑ 18.330(Conditional Use) ❑ 18.620(Tigard Triangle Design Standards) ❑ 18.765(o8-Street Parking/toading Requirements) ❑ 18.340(Directors Interpretation) ❑ 18.630(Washington Square Regional Center) ❑ 18.775(Sensitive Lands knew) Ili 18.350(Planned Development) ❑ 18.705(Accessitgreu/Circuhtion) ❑ 18.780(Signs) Ir 18.360(Site Development Review) ❑ 18.710(Accessory Residential Unit) ❑ 18.785(Temporary Use Permits) r,s 18.370(variunas/Adiust rents) --" ❑ 1 8.715(Density Conpuabons) • 18.790(Tree Removal) • 18.380(Zoning Map/Text Amendments) ❑ 1 8.720(Design Compatibility Standards) s1 18.195(Ytual Clearance Areas) [1] ,18.385(Miscellaneous Permit) ❑ 18.125(Environment]Performance Standards) j ' 'w ,� ..�►. tj - 1 8.390(Decision Making Procedures/impact Study)--/ ❑ 18.730(Exceptions To Development Standards) 0 18.798(Wirekss Communication facilities) ❑ 18.410(Lot tine Adjustments) ❑ 18.740(Historic overlay) ilp 18.810(Street&Utility Improvement Standards) ❑ 18.420(land Partitions) ❑ 18.742(Home Occupation Permits) ❑ 18.430(Subdivisions) ❑ 18.745(Landscaping&Sawing Standards) ••• ❑ 18.510(Residential loving District) ❑ 18.750(Manutactored/Mobd Home Regulations) L . 18.520(Commercial toning District) ✓ ❑ 18.755(Mixed Solid Waste/Recyding Storage) Li 18.530(Industrial Ioning District) ❑ 18.760(Honconlorming Situations) ADDITIONAL ITEMS: Noise,- fin G , ? (o(i►r- n.€ vt. ,.i.ys Tray, pL is s. V . Cole!(furl?) I:ScurpinVnasters\revised\land use application completeness review.dot REVISED: 17-Jan-01 1 r�iii��llir CITY OF TIGAR® OREGON January 26, 2004 Jim Barta do T-Mobile Wireless 1500 NE Irving Street, Suite 530 Portland, OR 97232 RE: Completeness Review-T-Mobile Wireless Facility, Case File No. SDR2003-00018 Dear Mr. Barta: The City has received the information necessary to begin the review of your Site Development Review application (SDR2003-00018). Staff has, therefore, deemed your application submittal as complete and will begin the review process. The estimated time for rendering a decision from the date an application is deemed complete is 6-8 weeks. If you have any questions regarding your application, please don't hesitate to contact me at (503) 639-4171 ext. 2428. Since ely, Morgan racy /47V. Associate Planner SDR2003-00018 Land Use File i:\curpin\morgan\workspace\sdr\sdr2003-00018(t-mobile masonic lodge)\sdr2003-00018 complete.doc 13125 SW Hall Blvd., Tigard, OR 97223 (503)639-4171 TDD (503)684-2772 saloN DNEflI4MOD lNiOI ,I,VDI'IddV ilild CITY OF TIGARD • PRE-APPLICATION CONFERENCE NOTES C�CMO,ryA,T 0ap` nt Sharing jr 23eturCommunity (Pre-Application Meeting Notes are Valid for Six (6) Months) NON-RESIDENTIAL MG CAE 10 0lo3 ivy_. n il.c.5 e .Acspiv,-app' APPLICANT:—Motm AGENT: 5t�►'►. FA,f et Phone: (593)' t / Phone: ( ) PROPERTY LOCATION: ADDRESS/GENERAL LOCATION: 1'3680 SW TAX MAP(S)/LOT #(S): 2S t iYZ CC Of/PO NECESSARY APPLICATIONS: 9 1 7 7 . 5.. 4 1.1`` ft- I . _ CUSIre le b� "St .o sceStn " PROPOSAL DESCRIPTION: /C& kit i+'toyrr lc- COMPREHENSIVE PLAN MAP DESIGNATION: Cjm,-lwcs'l Co" %ivy',etu.( ZONING MAP DESIGNATION: G'G. CITIZEN INVOLVEMENT TEAM (C.I.T.)AREA: ZONING DISTRICT DIMENSIONAL REQUIREMENTS (Refer to Code Section 18. 5O l MINIMUM LOT SIZE: sq. ft. Average Min. lot width: CO ft. Max. building height: 15 ft. Setbacks: Front ft. Side ZR ft. Rear ZO ft. Corner ft. from street. MAXIMUM SITE COVERAGE: % Minimum landscaped or natural vegetation area: /S %. [_) NEIGHBORHOOD MEETING (Refer to the Neighborhood Meeting Handoutl THE APPLICANT SHALL NOTIFY ALL PROPERTY OWNERS WITHIN 500 FEET, THE MEMBERS OF ANY LAND USE SUBCOMMITTEE(S), AND THE CITY OF TIGARD PLANNING DIVISION of their proposal. A minimum of two (2) weeks between the mailing date and the meeting date is required. Please review the Land Use Notification handout concerning site posting and the meeting notice. Meeting is to be held prior to submitting your application or the application will not be accepted. NOTE: In order to also preliminarily address building code standards, a meeting with a Plans Examiner is encouraged prior to submittal of a land use application. CITY OF TIGARD Pre-Application Conference Notes Page 1 of 8 NON-Residential Application/Planning Division Section v(NARRATIVE (Refer to Code Chapter 18.3901 The APPLICANT SHALL SUBMIT A NARRATIVE which provides findings based on the applicable approval standards. Failure to provide a narrative or adequately address criteria would be reason to consider an application incomplete and delay review of the proposal. The applicant should review the code for applicable criteria. J IMPACT STUDY (Refer to Code Section 18.390.040 nd 18.390.0501 7 O1 As a part of the APPLICATION SU REQUIREMENTS, applicants are required to INCLUDE IMPACT STUDY with their submittal package. The impact study shall quantify the effect of the development on public facilities and services. The study shall address, at a minimum, the transportation system, including bikeways, the drainage system, the parks system, the water system, the sewer system and the noise impacts of the development. For each public facility system and type of impact, the study shall propose improvements necessary to meet City standards, and to minimize the impact of the development on the public at large, public facilities systems, and affected private property users. In situations where the Community Development Code requires the dedication of real property interests, the applicant shall either specifically concur with the dedication requirement, or provide evidence which supports the conclusion that the real property dedication requirement is not roughly proportional to the projected impacts of the development. it( ACCESS (Refer to Chapters 18.705 and 18.7651 Minimum number of accesses: j X7O'pavcd Minimum access width: Minimum pavement width: All driveways and parking areas, except for some fleet storage parking areas, must be paved. Drive-in use queuing areas: [J WALKWAY REQUIREMENTS (Refer to Code Section 18.705.0301 WALKWAYS SHALL EXTEND FROM THE GROUND FLOOR ENTRANCES OR FROM THE GROUND FLOOR LANDING OF STAIRS, ramps, or elevators of all commercial, institutional, and industrial uses, to the streets which provide the required access and egress. Walkways shall provide convenient connections between buildings in multi-building commercial, institutional, and industrial complexes. Unless impractical, walkways should be constructed between a new development and neighboring developments. I I SPECIAL SETBACKS (Refer to Code Chapter 18.7301 STREETS: feet from the centerline of • LOWER INTENSITY ZONES: feet, along the site's boundary. • FLAG LOT: 10-FOOT SIDE YARD SETBACK. I I SPECIAL BUILDING HEIGHT PROVISIONS (Refer to Code Section 18.730.010.6.1 BUILDING HEIGHT EXCEPTIONS - Buildings located in a non-residential zone may be built to a height of 75 feet provided that: • A maximum building floor area to site area ratio (FAR) of 1.5 to 1 will exist; • All actual building setbacks will be at least half (1/2)of the building's height; and The structure will not abut a residential zoned district. [e,/BUFFERING AND SCREENING (Refer to Code Chapter 18.7451 In order TO INCREASE PRIVACY AND TO EITHER REDUCE OR ELIMINATE ADVERSE NOISE OR VISUAL IMPACTS between adjacent developments, especially between different land uses, the City requires landscaped buffer areas along certain site perimeters. Required buffer areas are described by the Code in terms of width. Buffer areas must be occupied by a mixture of deciduous and evergreen trees and shrubs and must also achieve a balance between vertical and horizontal plantings. Site obscuring screens or fences may also be required; these are often advisable even if not required by the Code. The required buffer areas may only be occupied by vegetation, fences, utilities, and walkways. Additional information on required buffer area materials and sizes may be found in the Development Code. CITY OF TIGARD Pre-Application Conference Notes Page 2 of 8 NON Residential Application/Planning Division Section • The ESTIMATED REQUIRED BUFFER WIDTHS applicable to your proposal area are: feet along north boundary. feet along east boundary. feet along south boundary. feet along west boundary. IN ADDITION, SIGHT OBSCURING SCREENING IS REQUIRED ALONG:-.c r rt U LANDSCAPING (Refer to Code Chapters 18.745,18.765 and 18.7051 C/14 yJf STREET TREES ARE REQUIRED FOR ALL DEVELOPMENTS FRONTING ON A PUBLIC OR PRIVATE STREET as well as driveways which are more than 100 feet in length. Street trees must be placed either within the public right-of-way or on private property within six (6) feet of the right-of- way boundary. Street trees must have a minimum caliper of at least two (2) inches when measured four (4) feet above grade. Street trees should be spaced 20 to 40 feet apart depending on the branching width of the proposed tree species at maturity. Further information on regulations affecting street trees may be obtained from the Planning Division. A MINIMUM OF ONE (1) TREE FOR EVERY SEVEN (7) PARKING SPACES MUST BE PLANTED in and around all parking areas in order to provide a vegetative canopy effect. Landscaped parking areas shall include special design features which effectively screen the parking lot areas from view. These design features may include the use of landscaped berms, decorative walls, and raised planters. RECYCLING (Refer to Code Chapter 18.755) Applicant should CONTACT FRANCHISE HAULER FOR REVIEW AND APPROVAL OF SITE SERVICING COMPATIBILITY. Locating a trash/recycling enclosure within a clear vision area such as at the intersection of two (2) driveways within a parking lot is prohibited. Much of Tigard is within Pride Disposal's Service area. Lenny Hing is the contact person and can be reached at (503) 625-6177. v PARKING (Refer to Code Section 18.765.040) REQUIRED parking for this type of use: Parking SHOWN on preliminary plan(s): SECONDARY USE REQUIRED parking: Parking SHOWN on preliminary plan(s): NO MORE THAN 50% OF REQUIRED SPACES MAY BE DESIGNATED AND/OR DIMENSIONED AS COMPACT SPACES. PARKING STALLS shall be dimensioned as follows: Standard parking space dimensions: 8 feet, 6 inches x 18 feet, 6 inches. Compact parking space dimensions: 7 feet, 6 inches x 16 feet, 6 inches. Note: Parking space width includes the width of a stripe that separates the parking space from an adjoining space. Note: A maximum of three (3) feet of the vehicle overhang area in front of a wheel stop or curb can be included as part of required parking space depth. This area cannot be included as landscaping for meeting the minimum percentage requirements. HANDICAPPED PARKING: Y All parking areas shall PROVIDE APPROPRIATELY LOCATED AND DIMENSIONED DISABLED PERSON PARKING spaces. The minimum number of disabled person parking spaces to be provided, as well as the parking stall dimensions, are mandated by the Americans with Disabilities Act (ADA). A handout is available upon request. A handicapped parking space symbol shall be painted on the parking space surface and an appropriate sign shall be posted. Y BICYCLE RACKS ARE REQUIRED FOR MULTI-FAMILY, COMMERCIAL AND INDUSTRIAL DEVELOPMENTS. Bicycle racks shall be located in areas protected from automobile traffic and in convenient locations. [ I LOADING AREA REQUIREMENTS (Refer to Code Section 18.765.080) Every COMMERCIAL OR INDUSTRIAL BUILDING IN EXCESS OF 10,000 SQUARE FEET shall be provided with a loading space. The space size and location shall be as approved by the City Engineer. CITY OF TIGARD Pre-Application Conference Notes Page 3 of 8 NON Residential Application/Planning Division Section I l BICYCLE RACKS (Refer to Code Section 18.7651 BICYCLE RACKS are required FOR MULTI-FAMILY, COMMERCIAL AND INDUSTRIAL DEVELOPMENTS. Bicycle racks shall be located in areas protected from automobile traffic and in convenient locations. ( I SENSITIVE LANDS (Refer to Code Chapter 181751 The Code provides REGULATIONS FOR LANDS WHICH ARE POTENTIALLY UNSUITABLE FOR DEVELOPMENT DUE TO AREAS WITHIN THE 100-YEAR FLOODPLAIN, NATURAL DRAINAGEWAYS, WETLAND AREAS, ON SLOPES IN EXCESS OF 25 PERCENT, OR ON UNSTABLE GROUND. Staff will attempt to preliminary identify sensitive lands areas at the pre- application conference based on available information. HOWEVER, the responsibility to precisely identify sensitive land areas, and their boundaries, is the responsibility of the applicant. Areas meeting the definitions of sensitive lands must be clearly indicated on plans submitted with the development application. Chapter 18.775 also provides regulations for the use, protection, or modification of sensitive lands areas. RESIDENTIAL DEVELOPMENT IS PROHIBITED WITHIN FLOODPLAINS. n STEEP SLOPES (Refer to Code Section 18.715.080.C1 When STEEP SLOPES exist, prior to issuance of a final order, a geotechnical report must be submitted which addresses the approval standards of the Tigard Community Development Code Section 18.775.080.C. The report shall be based upon field exploration and investigation and shall include specific recommendations for achieving the requirements of Section 18.775.080.C. RY CLEANWATER SERVICES(CWS)BUFFER STANDARDS (Refer to R a 0 96-44/USA Regulations-Chapter 31 LAND DEVELOPMENT ADJACENT TO SENSITIVE AREAS shall preserve and maintain or create a vegetated corridor for a buffer wide enough to protect the water quality functioning of the sensitive area. Design Criteria: The VEGETATED CORRIDOR WIDTH is dependent on the sensitive area. The following table identifies the required widths: TABLE 3.1 VEGETATED CORRIDOR WIDTHS SOURCE: CWS DESIGN AND CONSTRUCTION STANDARDS MANUAL/RESOLUTION & ORDER 96-44 SLOPE ADJACENT WIDTH OF VEGETATED SENSITIVE AREA DEFINITION 4 s TO SENSITIVE AREA CORRIDOR PER SIDE;, ♦ Streams with intermittent flow draining: <25% 0 10 to <50 acres 15 feet ► >50 to <100 acres 25 feet • Existing or created wetlands <0.5 acre 25 feet ♦ Existing or created wetlands >0.5 acre <25% 50 feet ♦ Rivers, streams, and springs with year-round flow • Streams with intermittent flow draining >100 acres • Natural lakes and .onds - ♦ Streams with intermittent flow draining: >25% 1 10 to <50 acres 30 feet ► >50 to <100 acres 50 feet • Existing or created wetlands >25% Variable from 50-200 feet. Measure ♦ Rivers, streams, and springs with year-round flow in 25-foot increments from the starting ♦ Streams with intermittent flow draining >100 acres point to the top of ravine (break in • Natural lakes and ponds <25%slope), add 35 feet past the top of ravine' 4Starting point for measurement = edge of the defined channel (bankful flow) for streams/rivers, delineated wetland boundary, delineated spring boundary, and/or average high water for lakes or ponds,whichever offers greatest resource protection. Intermittent springs, located a minimum of 15 feet within the river/stream or wetland vegetated corridor,shall not serve as a starting point for measurement SVegetated corridor averaging or reduction is allowed only when the vegetated corridor is certified to be in a marginal or degraded condition. 6The vegetated corridor extends 35 feet from the top of the ravine and sets the outer boundary of the vegetated corridor. The 35 feet may be reduced to 15 feet,if a stamped geotechnical report confirms slope stability shall be maintained with the reduced setback from the top of ravine. CITY OF TIGARD Pre-Application Conference Notes Page 4 of 8 NON Residential Appfication/Planning Division Section • Restrictions in the Vegetate Corridor: NO structures, development, construction activities, gardens, lawns, application of chemicals, dumping of any materials of any kind, or other activities shall be permitted which otherwise detract from the water quality protection provided by the vegetated corridor, except as provided for in the CWS Design and Construction Standards. Location of Vegetated Corridor: IN ANY RESII3ENTIAL DEVELOPMENT WHICH CREATES MULTIPLE PARCELS or lots intended for separate ownership, such as a subdivision, the vegetated corridor shall be contained in a separate tract, and shall not be a part of any parcel to be used for the construction of a dwelling unit. CWS Service Provider Letter: PRIOR TO SUBMITTAL of any land use applications, the applicant must obtain a CWS Service Provider Letter which will outline the conditions necessary to comply with the R&O 96-44 sensitive area requirements. If there are no sensitive areas, CWS must still issue a letter stating a CWS Service Provider Letter is not required. r1 SIGNS (Refer to Code Chapter 18.780) SIGN PERMITS MUST BE OBTAINED PRIOR TO INSTALLATION OF ANY SIGN in the City of Tigard. A "Guidelines for Sign Permits" handout is available upon request. Additional sign area or height beyond Code standards may be permitted if the sign proposal is reviewed as part of a development review application. Alternatively, a Sign Code Exception application may be filed for Director's review. ❑ TREE REMOVAL PLAN REQUIREMENTS (Refer to Code Section 18.790.030.CJ A TREE PLAN FOR THE PLANTING, REMOVAL AND PROTECTION OF TREES repared by a certified arborist shall be provided for any lot, parcel or combination of lots or parcels for which a cf-61/144 development application for a subdivision, partition, site development review, planned development, 71ti or conditional use is filed. Protection is preferred over removal where possible. loo THE TREE PLAN SHALL INCLUDE the following: ➢ Identification of the location, size and species of all existing trees including trees designated as significant by the City; ➢ Identification of a program to save existing trees or mitigate tree removal over 12 inches in caliper. Mitigation must follow the replacement guidelines of Section 18.790.060.D according to the following standards and shall be exclusive of trees required by other development code provisions for landscaping, streets and parking lots: Retainage of less than 25% of existing trees over 12 inches in caliper requires a mitigation program according to Section 18.150.070.D. of no net loss of trees; Retainage of from 25 to 50% of existing trees over 12 inches in caliper requires that two- thirds of the trees to be removed be mitigated according to Section 18.790.060.D.; Retainage of from 50 to 75% of existing trees over 12 inches in caliper requires that 50% of the trees to be removed be mitigated according to Section 18.790.060.D.; Retainage of 75% or greater of existing trees over 12 inches in caliper requires no mitigation; ➢ Identification of all trees which are proposed to be removed; and ➢ A protection program defining standards and methods that will be used by the applicant to protect trees during and after construction. TREES REMOVED WITHIN THE PERIOD OF ONE (1) YEAR PRIOR TO A DEVELOPMENT APPLICATION LISTED ABOVE will be inventoried as part of the tree plan above and will be replaced according to Section 18.790.060.D. ] MITIGATION (Refer to Code Section 18.190.060.E l REPLACEMENT OF A TREE shall take place according to the following guidelines: ➢ A replacement tree shall be a substantially similar species considering site characteristics. ➢ If a replacement tree of the species of the tree removed or damaged is not reasonably available, the Director may allow replacement with a different species of equivalent natural resource value. CITY OF TIGARD Pre-Application Conference Notes Page 5 of 8 NON Residential Application/Planning Division Section Y If a replacement tree of the size cut is not reasonably available on the local market or would not be viable, the Director shall require replacement with more than one tree in accordance with the following formula: 0 The number of replacement trees required shall be determined by dividing the estimated caliper size of the tree removed or damaged, by the caliper size of the largest reasonably available replacement trees. If this number of trees cannot be viably located on the subject property, the Director may require one (1) or more replacement trees to be planted on other property within the city, either public property or, with the consent of the owner, private property. Y The planting of a replacement tree shall take place in a manner reasonably calculated to allow growth to maturity. IN LIEU OF TREE REPLACEMENT under Subsection D of this section, a party may, with the consent of the Director, elect to compensate the City for its costs in performing such tree replacement. K) I I CLEAR VISION AREA (Refer to Code Chapter 18.7951 - 1 -70 ' eV/1"i' G` 4 r045446.- e„I/1I,, 4'°1d The City requires that CLEAR VISION AREAS BE MAINTAINED BETWEEN THEE (3) 1AND2nfnr�. EIGHT (8) FEET IN HEIGHT at road/driveway, road/railroad, and road/road intersections. The size of the required clear vision area depends upon the abutting street's functional classification and any existing obstructions within the clear vision area. ADDITIONAL LOT DIMENSIONAL REQUIREMENTS (Refer to Code Section 18.810.0601 MINIMUM LOT FRONTAGE: 25 feet unless lot is created through the minor land partition process. Lots created as part of a partition must have a minimum of 15 feet of frontage or have a minimum 15-foot wide access easement. The DEPTH OF ALL LOTS SHALL NOT EXCEED 21/2 TIMES THE AVERAGE WIDTH, unless the parcel is less than 11/2 times the minimum lot size of the applicable zoning district. CODE CHAPTERS 18.330(Conditional Use) 18.620(Tigard Triangle Design Standards) 18.765(Off-Street Parking/Loading Requirements) 18.340(Directors Interpretation) 18.630(Washington Square Regional Center) _ 18.775(Sensitive Lands Review) 18.350(Planned Development) ----7-18.705(Access/Egress/Circulation) _ 18.780(Signs) 18.360(Site Development Review) 18.710(Accessory Residential Units) _ 18.785(Temporary Use Permits) 18.370(Variances/Adjustments) 18.715(Density Computations) _,18.790(Tree Removal) 18.380(Zoning Map/Text Amendments) 18.720(Design Compatibility Standards) t✓ 18.795(Visual Clearance Areas) _. 18.385(Miscellaneous Permits) 18.725(Environmental Performance Standards) '-" 18.798(Wireless Communication Facilities) 18.390(Decision Making Procedures/Impact Study) 18.730(Exceptions To Development Standards) v 18.810(Street&Utility Improvement Standards) 18.410(Lot Line Adjustments) _ 18.740(Historic Overlay) 18.420(Land Partitions) 18.742(Home Occupation Permits) 18.430(Subdivisions) _Y 18.745(Landscaping&Screening Standards) 18.510(Residential Zoning Districts) 18.750(Manufactured/Mobil Home Regulations) 18.520(Commercial Zoning Districts) 18.755(Mixed Solid Waste/Recycling Storage) 18.530(Industrial Zoning Districts) 18.760(Nonconforming Situations) CITY OF TIGARD Pre-Application Conference Notes Page 6 of 8 NON-Residenbai Application/Planning Division Section ADDITIONAL CONCERNS OR COMMENTS: 6 7/ valt. (ei✓t f t,/ cbYki c p1Je S v A m r i?%f PROCEDURE ✓ Administrative Staff Review. Public hearing before the Land Use Hearings Officer. Public hearing before the Planning Commission. Public hearing before the Planning Commission with the Commission making a recommendation on the proposal to the City Council. An additional public hearing shall be held by the City Council. APPLICATION SUBMITTAL PROCESS All APPLICATIONS MUST BE ACCEPTED BY A PLANNING DIVISION STAFF MEMBER of the Community Development Department at Tigard City Hall offices. PLEASE NOTE: Applications submitted by mail or dropped off at the counter without Planning Division acceptance may be returned. The Planning counter closes at 4:00 PM. Maps submitted with an application shall be folded IN ADVANCE to 8.5 by 11 inches. One (1), 81/2" x 11" map of a proposed project should be submitted for attachment to the staff report or administrative decision. Application with unfolded maps shall not be accepted. The Planning Division and Engineering Department will perform a preliminary review of the application and will determine whether an application is complete within 30 days of the counter submittal. Staff will notify the applicant if additional information or additional copies of the submitted materials are required. CITY OF TIGARD Pre-Application Conference Notes Page 7 of 8 NON-Residential Application/Planning Division Section The administrative decision or public hearing will typically occur approximately 45 to 60 days after an application is accepted as being complete by the Planning Division. Applications involving difficult or protracted issues or requiring review by other jurisdictions may take additional time to review. Written recommendations from the Planning staff are issued seven (7) days prior to the public hearing. A 10-day public appeal period follows all land use decisions. An appeal on this matter would be heard by the Tigard klew,,, o ceo., . A basic flow chart which illustrates the review process is available from the Planning Division upon request. Land use applications requiring a public hearing must have notice posted on-site by the applicant no less than 10 days prior to the public hearing. This PRE-APPLICATION CONFERENCE AND THE NOTES OF THE CONFERENCE ARE INTENDED TO INFORM the prospective applicant of the primary Community Development Code requirements applicable to the potential development of a particular site and to allow the City staff and prospective applicant to discuss the opportunities and constraints affecting development of the site. BUILDING PERMITS PLANS FOR BUILDING AND OTHER RELATED PERMITS WILL NOT BE ACCEPTED FOR REVIEW UNTIL A LAND USE APPROVAL HAS BEEN ISSUED. Final inspection approvals by the Building Division will not be granted until there is compliance with all conditions of development approval. These pre-application notes do not include comments from the Building Division. For proposed buildings or modifications to existing buildings, it is recommended to contact a Building Division Plans Examiner to determine if there are building code issues that would prevent the structure from being constructed, as proposed. Additionally, with regard to Subdivisions and Minor Land Partitions where any structure to be demolished has system development charge (SDC) credits and the underlying parcel for that structure will be eliminated when the new plat is recorded, the City's policy is to apply those system development credits to the first building permit issued in the development (UNLESS OTHERWISE DIRECTED BY THE DEVELOPER AT THE TIME IN WHICH THE DEMOLITION PERMIT IS OBTAINED). PLEASE NOTE: The conference and notes cannot cover all Code requirements and aspects related to site planning that should apply to the development of your site plan. Failure of the staff to provide information required by the Code shall not constitute a waiver of the applicable standards or requirements. It is recommended that a prospective applicant either obtain and read the Community Development Code or ask any questions of City staftrelative to Code requirements prior to submitting an application. AN ADDITIONAL PRE-APPLICATION FEE AND CONFERENCE WILL BE REQUIRED IF AN APPLICATION PERTAINING TO THIS PRE-APPLICATION CONFERENCE IS SUBMITTED AFTER A PERIOD OF MORE THAN SIX (6) MONTHS FOLLOWING THIS CONFERENCE (unless deemed as unnecessary by the Planning Division). PREPARED BY: N,r9tti, T CITY OF TIGAI PLANNING DIVISION - STAFF PERSON HOLDING PRE-APP. MEETING PHONE: (503) 639-4171 FAX: (503) 684-7297 E-MAIL (staff's first name)@atigard.or.us TITLE 18(CITY OF TIGARD'S COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT CODE)INTERNET ADDRESS: www.ci.tigard.or.us H:lpattylmasters\Pre-App Notes Commercial.doc Updated: 3-Oct-02 (Engineering section:preapp.eng) CITY OF TIGARD Pre-Application Conference Notes Page 8 of 8 NON Residential Application/Planning Division Section 10/02/2003 14: 33 FAX 5036847297 City of Tigard I j004 IP Ilil PRE-APPLICATION k-"§- !' CONFERENCE REQUEST CITY OF TIGARD 13125 SW Hall Blvd., Tigard, OR 97223(503) 639-4171 FAX: (503) 684-7297 GENERAL INFORMATION r r j FOR STAFF USE ONLY Applicant: (�I ' 'c 1 (r' t e SS Address: (S U f'V�.-Yfv,n� S}c c--?,, hone: P3-x)3-H4X) Case No. f i��O© -�� ?�— �� / Z 3 Z Receipt No.: City: f�"<rL.�+ �t o� L Zip' Application Accepted By: jfd-/ 'S Contact Person: `� i�' r`� Phone: rb3-S-y y"Z42(11 Date: "` ' / 7 t'' Property Owner/Deed Holder(s): DATE OF PRE-APP.: /0-3e3— 03 . 9w Lei p 2� TIME OF PRE-APP.: �l.' Ali Address: P'&u•,c 23') 1I Phone: S.- -3 -67-r-yairy PRE-APP. HELD WITH: City: IA '21 t-''i`"/l) 1 Ott Zip: <I 3 Zr) Rev.11/8/2002 i:lcerplrA masters\revised\Pre-AppRequest.doc Property Address/Location(s): 13 Vio SW A^ -141' 4115 C,w--,) REQUIRED SUBMITTAL ELEMENTS (Note: applications will not be accepted Tt�/�,; i t� without the required submittal elements) Tax Map & Tax Lot#(s): .Z 51 t9 Z CC 01100 j L. Pre-Application Conf. Request Form Zoning: v 2 COPIES EACH OF THE FOLLOWING: Site Size: 1 6"-.1 4r`r Brief Description of the Proposal and any site-specific questions/issues that PRE-APPLICATION CONFERENCE INFORMATION you would like to have staff research prior to the meeting. All of the information identified on this form are required to be Site Plan. The site plan must show the submitted by the applicant and received by the Planning Division a Site Plan lots site pl building layouts owhe minimum of one (1) week prior to officially scheduling a drawn to scale. Also, show the location Pre-application conference dateltime to allow staff ample time to of the subject property in relation to the prepare for the meeting. nearest streets; and the locations of driveways on the subject property and A pre-application conference can usually be scheduled within 1-2 across the street. weeks of the Planning Division's receipt of the request for either Tuesday or Thursday mornings. Pre-application conferences are T- The Proposed Uses. one (1) hour lonq and are typically held between the hours of Topographic Information. Include 9:00 11:00 AM. Contour Lines if Possible. PRE-APPLICATION CONFERENCES MUST BE SCHEDULED IN Iii If the Pre-Application Conference is for a PERSON AT THE COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT COUNTER FROM MONOPOLE project, the applicant must 8:00-4:00 1MONDAY-FRIDAY. attach a copy of the letter and proof in the form of an affidavit of mailing, that IF MORE THAN 4 PEOPLE ARE EXPECTED TO ATTEND THE the collocation protocol was completed (see CONFERENCE IN YOUR GROUP, PLEASE Cee Section 18.798.080 of the Tigard Community Development 0 Code). INFORM THE CITY IN ADVANCE SO THAT ALTERNATE ROOM ARRANGEMENTS CAN BE MADE TO ACCOMMODATE THE L Filing Fee $205.00 GROUP. -- CITY OF TIGARD 10/17/2003 13125 SW Ha11 Blvd. 2:18:47PM Tigard,Oregon 9 72 23 ,L Ii.. (503) 639-4171 Receipt #: 27200300000000004615 Date: 10/17/2003 Line Items: Case No Tran Code Description Revenue Account No Amount Paid PRE2003-00095 [LANDUS]PreApp Conf 100-0000-438000 205.00 Line Item Total: $205.00 Payments: Method Payer User ID Acct./Check Approval No. How Received Amount P' Check T MOBILE 1690317 In Person 205.00 Payment Total: $205.00 Page 1 of 1 cReceipt.rpt Pre-Apps (CD Meetings) October2003 S M T W T F S 1 2 3 4 , 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 Thursday, October 30, 2003 8:00 8:30 9.00 T-Mobile (Monopole) a plica t: Jim Berta... ' Kl 7 f° -app 9:30 (GMtGA«i 10:00Pre-App 10:30 11:00 Pre-app '11:30 12:00 12:30 1:00 1:30 2:00 2:30 3:00 3:30 4:00 4:30 5:00 5:30 6:00 2:29PM Friday,October 17, 2003 . . . . T . .Mobile m,¢ October 17, 2003 Pre-Application Conference Proposal Description T-Mobile wireless is proposing to construct a new wireless communications facility on the property located at 13680 SW Pacific Highway,Tigard, OR. The proposed facility will consist of a 100-foot monopole and BTS radio transmitting equipment cabinets mounted on the ground adjacent to the monopole. The proposed monopole and cabinets will be placed within an 18' X 25' lease area on the property which is currently occupied by the Masonic Lodge. The lease area would be located on the south side of the existing lodge building. The proposed lease area would be surrounded by a chain link fence with privacy slats and a 5 foot landscape buffer. This proposed facility is needed by T-mobile to supply wireless coverage in this area of Tigard that currently has sub-standard T-mobile coverage. 1500 NE Irving St Portland,OR 97232 1 • e P • • • ■ ■ • ■ b� ■o October 3, 2003 AT&T Wireless, Attn. Collocation Manager 1600 SW Fourth Ave. Portland, OR 97201 RE: Proposed T-Mobile site in Tigard,OR Dear Sir/Madam: Pursuant to the requirements of 18.798.080,T-Mobile is hereby providing you with notice of our intent to meet with representatives of the City of Tigard, OR in a pre-application conference to discuss the location a new free-standing wireless communication facility that would be located at 13680 SW Pacific Hwy,Tigard,OR. In general,we plan to construct a monopole of 100 feet in height for the purpose of providing PCS service. Please inform us whether your company has any existing or pending wireless facilities located within 2,000 feet of the proposed facility that may be available for possible collocation opportunities.Please provide us with this information within 10 business days after the date of this letter.Your cooperation is appreciated. Si cerely��.�d James Barta Zoning Specialist 503-544-2429 1500 NE Irving St Portland,OR 97232 • • • • :F. • Me Affidavit of Mailing This letter confirms the notification letter required by section 18.798.080 of the Tigard Development Code was mailed from T-Mobile Portland offices to other licensed wireless communications providers within the city of Tigard on October 3,2003 and October 9, 2003 l - / /0 i/ 3103 Signature Date James C. Barta 1500 NE Irving St Portland,OR 97232 • • T. • •MGbile October 6, 2003 Washington County Consolidated Communication Attn. Collocation Manager P.O. Box 6375 Beaverton, OR 97007 RE:Proposed T-Mobile site in Tigard,OR Dear Sir/Madam: Pursuant to the requirements of 18.798.080,T-Mobile is hereby providing you with notice of our intent to meet with representatives of the City of Tigard,OR in a pre-application conference to discuss the location a new free-standing wireless communication facility that would be located at 13680 SW Pacific Hwy,Tigard,OR.In general, we plan to construct a monopole of 100 feet in height for the purpose of providing PCS service.Please inform us whether your company has any existing or pending wireless facilities located within 2,000 feet of the proposed facility that may be available for possible collocation opportunities.Please provide us with this information within 10 business days after the date of this letter.Your cooperation is appreciated. Sincerely, James Barta Zoning Specialist 503-544-2429 1500 NE Irving St Portland,OR 97232 20i21i2003 7E 16:00 Fo1S0 37363014 1 * *Obi/ �001 et / t . elf ktoye 15pp � " i. l� �1 PN jR 1 ra F QRZ'LA LNG, $ UI T co,� O QG, acSrM1L. T N O R 9 7 z 2 #$gy p s F,ix '� � � �' f v it 4L Sft ii.l, B1t p �? � 7tpO6 NUMB 6' ; ti D47 : SCi/`� f No op p4Ggs u'►cc __ Oar /a„iv po NUafBjr CDR (3 Elio, No7�o0 AOR REED \F�Nv,� Sv ., s"7 7 PiE,4s 3G 3�1¢ �Y2 /' V�, c Calms[, ., IV-r, N '�5 _ „..../4 c a pz&�E REPLY v� `.Y / 474.14..- 4 PLL'dSg RELY cLE �, L,� 51 1/ 1li'Kcy 4 01- �c�. 2d JC L ,�c 72,,e f 10/21/2003 TUE 16:00 FAX 15037363014 Z002 ran -_-- vaimont .,. COMMUNICATIONS October 8, 2003 Name Company Address Address Address Ref: Design and failure modes for a 100 ft Tapered Monopole Quality of Steel and Fabrication of a Monopole Structure Site: Pole to be designed with a SO ft theoretical fall radius In order to assure you of the high quality of all Valmont/Microflect products, we would like to offer the following comments: • Communications monopole structures designed by Valmont/Microflect are sized in accordance with the latest revision of the EIA/TIA 222 Standard entitled "Structural Standards for Steel Antenna Towers and Antenna Supporting Structures" unless otherwise requested by our customer. This standard has been approved by ANSI, who has generated the standard for "Minimum Design Loads for Buildings and Other Structures". The standard, which is the basis for design loading for almost every building code and standard in the country, has dealt with the design of antenna support structures for over 40 years_ The EIA standard, based on provisions of this nationally known specification, has a long history of reliability. At its core philosophy Is it's first and foremost priority to safeguard and maintain the health and welfare of the public. • The EIA standard designates a minimum wind loading for each county in the United States. Valmont/Microflect uses the wind loading listed in the latest EIA standard unless the customer specifies a larger value. This site is also designed for"h" radial ice at 75% design wind loading. Statistically, the basic wind speed listed in the EIA standard has been determined to be the wind that has an average reoccurrence of 50 years (in other words the magnitude has a 2% chance of occurring in any one year,) This wind is the "fastest mile- wind at 33 ft. above the ground. By definition, the "fastest mile" wind is the average velocity of a mile of wind passing a fixed point A height coefficient to account for increasing wind speed with height, and an exposure coefficient, are conservative coefficients that are used to ensure that the structure will survive the designed wind speed. The structure can usually survive even a Communications Division,V Imont Industries,In<. P,RIM 3575 25th Street SE Solorn,Oregon 97302-1123 USA f MNICROFLECT 503-363-9276 Fox 503-363-4613 • �valmont_com 10/21/2003 TUE 16:01 FAX 15037363014 Cilj 003 • LuuJ lY. r rtan valmont COMMUNICATIONS greater wind load than the basic design wind speed because of these conservative coefficients. • Design and loading assumptions that are used for the analysis of these structures are very conservative in nature when compared to other codes, which makes structural failure highly improbable. • Failure of a steel monopole occurs when a point is reached where the induced stresses exceed the yield strength of the material. At this point, the deflections induced in the material are no longer temporary. Hence, a permanent deflection in the monopole would exist. • The term failure above refers to local buckling at a designated point on the pole. Local buckling does not cause a free falling pole; rather it relieves the stresses from the pole at this location. Monopoles are flexible, forgiving structures that are not generally susceptible to damage by impact loads such as wind gust or earthquake shocks. • When local buckling occurs, a relatively small portion of the shaft distorts and "kinks"the steel. When the pole begins to bend the exposure area is reduced and therefore, the force due to wind is decreased as well. Even though buckling exists, the cross section of the pole is capable of carrying the entire vertical load. Therefore, wind induced loads could not conceivably bring this type of structure to the ground due to the excellent ductile properties, design criteria, and failure mode. • Valmont/Microflect has provided structures that have performed well during the earthquakes in California, the hurricanes in the South (including Hugo, Andrew, and Opal), and a number of tornadoes. To our knowledge, Valmont/Mlcroflect has never experienced an in service failure of a communication pole due to weather Induced overloading, even though, as in the cases of Hurricane Hugo and Hurricane Andrew. the wind speeds exceeded the design wind speed. • ValmontlMicroflect's communication towers have proven to be very reliable products. In our over 40 years of engineering and fabricating thousands of towers and monopoles, we have not had one structure fail due to overloading (even in the extreme cases that wind speeds have drastically exceeded design values). We use the latest standards, wind speed information, and sophisticated analytical tools to ensure that we maintain our unblemished record for quality. Valmont/Microflect quality of steel and manufacturing: • The monopole is fabricated from ASTM A572 Grade 65 material with a controlled silicon content of 0.06% maximum to ensure a uniform galvanized coating_ The base material is fabricated from Grade 60 material. All plate material meets a V-Notch toughness requirement of 15 ft-lbs. @ -20 degrees Communications Division,Valmont Industries.Inc. %*= moil r=�� ^C 3575 25th Street SE Salem,Oregon 97302-1123 USA LJ PJICRO LECT 5■ 3.363-9276 Fcz 503.363-4.613 �.'.'volmont.com 10/21/2003 TUE 16:01 FAX 15037363014 [x]004 - e L IJ V ai t Y.V Lisa - — 0 valniont COMMUNICATIONS Fahrenheit. By meeting the strict toughness requirement, the monopole is best suited to resist the cyclic/fatigue type loading (i.e. wind induced loading) these structures exhibit. • Vatmont/Microflect anchor bolts are fabricated from A615 Grade 75 material. The bolts are 2 VI in diameter, made from#18J bar stock. Anchor bolts come • complete with two (2)A194 Grade 2H hex nuts. • For the past 40 years, our company has always guaranteed the quality of the steel used in building our structures. Material Certifications are available on all material at the time of fabrication. Fabrication of the monopole is performed in accordance with the provisions of the AISC Manual of Steel Construction and ASCE's Design of steel Transmission Pole Structures. All welding and inspection is in accordance with the American Welding Society's Specification D1.1-latest revision. Testing and inspection reports are available upon request at the time of fabrication. In addition, we have been asked to design this monopole to theoretically fail at approximately the 50 ft. elevation by purposely over designing the pole sections below this point. In the unlikely event the pole were to fail at this point, the significant loading reduction caused by the removal of the tower wind area and weight above would greatly reduce any chance that the remaining tower would have any structural damage, thereby providing a theoretical failure radius of approximately 50 ft I hope these comments address the issues that you might encounter relative to the anticipated performance of monopole structures and quality of steel fabrication. If you have additional questions or comments, I may be reached at (503) 589-6618. Sincerely, David Casey Associate Engineer { Communications Division,Valmont Industrics,Inc. PiRIM r ry 1 3575 25th Street SE Salem,Oregon 97302-1123 USA l'�`l 503-363-9276 Fax 503-363-4613 u..........otmont_com 1 10/21/2003 TUE 16:02 FAX 15037363014 U1005 i� __ t .7 . it ___ 1 t `\ lilliiill ,� ( N. t rId � 9 o r-• I O, tr '1 19 • ,. 1: 1191 • • • / 1w ' IT • NV. %......... A40* %N. • : tie Af -,q4411,. /I ./4 /i/ Nssb. ;i410:'\"1"/ /- — 41hL 7 lik....Ns/ 1111111,.. Awe iopp. .7 i / 1$1 71-CI . *Or ---/N -' , ..41"/ ii, m ' a /\44 el i el i 4 el i el el il S. i r" 1500 N.E.191ANG STREET, SLATE 530 PORTLAND, OREGON 97232 ` PHONE 503 813-9000 FAX 503 736-3014 1, 1► 4.3-"%.". gillfIr .; _,.. 4 6.b� Win 00010.4.VO'thStLffl 74 " �� A t,u)2N-7377 �� M rid.w......... ` J SITE NAME �p KING CITY � SITE NUMBER RELEASE PO-4037-C "� 9:00 w 0.0 Deport 1500 NE kriq St Portland,OR 97232 on NE tr.►ly St(Foot) °An°� 2pN91C RENEW 98 yds 9:00 AM 0.1 Turn LEFT(North)onto Rmp 0.2 mi 1-84/VS-30 9:00 AM 0.3 Moss onto 1-84[55-30](East)1.1 011 9:02 AM 1.4 At 1-84 Exit 2.turn off onto Ramp 0.1 not 3910 A. 9:02 AM 1.5 Tun LEFT(North)onto NE 39th Mn 0.1 M 9:03 AM 1.7 Tun LEFT(Mat)onto 05-30 Bus[NE Sody BIM)0.1 ni *03 AM 1.6 Boa RIGHT(Worst)onto Romp 0.3 011 1-84/VS-30 9:04 AM 21 Merge onto 1-64(US-30)(Nest)1.7 m 9:06 AM 18 Tun off onto Rang 0.4 mi 1-5/Salem 9:06 AM 4.2 thew onto 1-5(South)7.4 mi 8.15 AM 11.6 At 1-5 EM 294,tun off onto Romp D.3 011 CR-990/Tlgod/ 816AM 11.9 Mem onto SR-990(SW BortU Bhd)(west)26 ml I� N 920 AM 14.5 AMEN 13680 SW Pacific/I•%PortlaW OR 97223 I MLLI DATE DRIVING DIRECTIONS ,, t A� SW Mopleletd - IE DoE DESIGNS C17c IIAIi• cTr MLII4RFR 1-1 GENERAL NFOMAROM 7tN5 OUwNC 0 COPH80 iTED AND t5 THE Sat .fie ..ma1o.. ow ..� ado no`O"O� : .1.:� x c el or n .04 nonce me m crosr awn w ACM WO. AA ASSOCIATES LLG _ )1 PROPERTY OF THE OWIVER. IT 6 PRODUCED ,1T '1- Tolce - .A� 19910 SE MCTORY LANE KING QTY PD 4037-C SU-1 SITE SUMEY SOLELY RR USE BY 114E 0114469 ONO ns AFTUATES "I eNV0 11X•100 s 0000 4� tr'!'50p 29 -- SNOT,OE 070.55 C-1 ER09011 CONTROL RAN NA DETAILS RFPNOOIICTI011 OR USE OF THIS WANK AND/OR 13.0 Boon k TEL: (SOST 750-4667 THE NFORMADON CONTANED N IT:c FORDUOOI .A I..."W`""a °' 8 .Yee >a 9 - 1'_ *6'F` FAX (50.1)736-3014 TTGAIL LODGE NO 207 A-1 ovERALL 91E RAN IFITIOU1 THE MITTEN PEII650ON O CIE OM TER.OR SA 1"01'01 son � i s Vle_x�t s `:; T�,�� ncAf�,OR 97223 PORTLAND,OR 97261 MD w�i c n.o o nK m ^,_ R o PO BAK 230184 A-2 ENLARGED SITE PLAN erec SIIUo S.IAmrl 9 ,,�-ate. 1 P T . . 3 t_ r °'' ANDERSCH DABNOM9g CONTACT:RNi1 609104 A-3 ELEVATIONS STE NAME oe 0110 as. UMW. W 7 and St \ a.e E y iS 5� j F..; ARCHITECTS LLC CONTACT Pk(503)62`5-4064 A-4 EQUIPMENT DETA6.S I OS MCC CIA. w 11tH o. atsl 111,aAa1A� \ :": .•--• POOR SE 3SUITE 200 n 0loaoe 1111.01 ..�v i5 t ,- •,..� _ Cl( A-5 CONS7RUCRON DETAILS oast ,y .. 55pp7,�) �/ mrt. Mt8 rooi11r A.t.em 1. 1011 00.x`0 jt., *y 4., 1�!~ _ s ' TEL E '2 � 1-1 UMW-WE RAN K1 NQ C, ■ 76 OA rd. UM :„ • 011 ma.11� wauc - �anv'�■. 9h 5.2 CONTACT: A AAA •m N.� .' mem y6� 'L..j J1LO�Lr OK n .-01 Lora NM x 6 .45-•• ��(‘M`^ I I l�lmIL w¢SMEAR WIRELESS 0. MR. 0 ,.a ■ ( ) 1500 N.E NMMG STREET.SUITE 530 l SITE NUMBER w- Y 0116 a91C - G1 0. , 1 PORTLAND,OR 97223 SHEET INDEX 1. 20000 CONTACT: 9,6 601-8594 Ala T.Costa K u PI ,� p _1.n. ) TE' `Tigard CORST.CONTACT:(503)267-0717 GATE E19ER m xis my p y� son Q STE ACOO9110N CONTACT:(10.7)647-19.7 DON FORSBE80 ea.n, -+ - I PO-4037-C • m1a L INS r� 0.n.C.f. 00. .01/1 )IVO m5-. INS. m D/, _ '�• m 1.3031 Pc WO. v. 5-m.. 5*. yk_� VOICES-MEAN PROPOSES TO CONSTRUCT AN UNSTAFTED RADIO r11a 0 oP,°�p 01 5 .1100 - ,',J.`,.-"--,- 4 =a' TELECOMMUNICATIONS FACUTY COISSTNG O A 11NEE-SECTOR NIIENN* LANDLORD 5R ADDRESS n01ine nuoamn affil awi,�o mrn° . ,n * $ 8o't' m " `^`)3 - ' WAY 116(6)PRESENT,(3)FUTURE,(9)TOTAL MD TRANSMITTER r• AN rim wan on t ooa um o: -°•'� EOUIPI )41 MOUNTED ON A tEl STEEL MONOPOLE 100'. 9 i ACOU19T cm r, ,. ,., 0 rloa'0° 1 13680 SW PACIFIC HWY 1110, MST 0 0.100.X1.1 0 "W • N a ' j AREA OF asesa PARED NUIBEEilit "••"® 4 '1E1 U ? a �t . ��, a 1.09 AC aio2C5 51100 2MJf A. TICARD, OR 97223 SW�sn Sk..v T. RE ENGNEEe A REVISION I loo 1 ROOM NUMBER g .1 ` larJ J�, P u:0. ° ° i6 PROECT MANAGER 5-0 MEET.-0 .r-:-'''''-- 'ia OTT a 1N.ARD 618 50.FEET E UT N457S'ISY r. I I Q KEY NOTE SECTOR 3W Oi:rha:n Pd ,W Lvn.m:7d P f :,f ,,,r''!' LONG I 122.4ro0.6• GIN9TR MANAGER &- REFERENCE ( SOURCE:NOD 83 - - OETAML REFERENCE /"'-' 11 \.• 1. PAR1(NC IEQIIEy1E1TS ARE UNCHANGED OPERATORS GENERAL INFORMATION bi s J I Ni.E1a1 I 2. TRAFIC IS UNAFFECTED PS ® ELEVATOR REFERENCE - -• l "-- 4iW 1 SN71AE AT STE a PROPOSED . _.. 4 MEET NAM ABBREVIATIONS & SYMBOLS VICINITY MAP N.T.S. PROJECT TEAM PROJECT INFORMATION APPROVALS T-1 PLOT NULL 1:1 I •••T ••�AM,��obile• DESCRIPP,Qy$ • FRVF11111I 1500 N.E.RMNG STREET, SUITE 530 PARENT PARCEL PORTLAND. OREGON. 97232 (PER DEED REFERENCE NUMBER 87040529 OF THE DEED RECORDS OF WASHINGTON COUNTY, OREGON.) PHONE 503 212-051 ( ) FAX 503 232-0519 COMMUNICATIONS LEASE PREMISES BEGINNING AT THE SOUTHEAST CORNER OF A COMMUNICATIONS LEASE SITE FROM WHICH THE NORTHWEST CORNER Land Mark OF LOT 18, FRELEON HEIGHTS- PLAT 2 AS PLATTED AND RECORDED IN VOLUME 8, PAGE 26 OF THE PLAT RECORDS OF WASHINGTON COUNTY, OREGON BEARS SOUTH 48'31'53" EAST 237.81 FEET; THENCE NORTH 5011'09" SURVEYING INC. -1,. WEST 22.00 FEET; THENCE NORTH 39128'51" EAST 28.00 FEET; THENCE SOUTH 5011'09" EAST 22.00 FEET; 3329 N.E. Stephens Street THENCE SOUTH 3978'51" WEST 28.00 FEET TO THE POINT OF BEGINNING AND CONTAINING 616 SQUARE FEET MORE Roseburg. Oregon 97470 ''%".t OR LESS. Tel(541)677-9400 C3 22-FOOT ACCESS EASEMENT DESCRIPTION Fax(541)677-9401 .1� - vIw Fax VLS7192 ^S. �d 3/1'R BEGINNING AT A POINT ON THE EASTERLY RIGHT-OF-WAY 1JNE OF PACIFIC HIGHWAY(US HIGHWAY 99) FROM WHICH �tiG \' THE NORTHWEST CORNER OF LOT 18, FRELEON HEIGHTS- PUT 2 AS PLATTED AND RECORDED IN VOLUME B,PAGE G•., 26 OF THE PLAT RECORDS OF WASHINGTON COUNTY, OREGON BEARS SOUTH 39•44'35"EAST 336.02 FEET; THENCE SOUTH 50'31'09" EAST 81.96 FEET; THENCE SOUTH 3928'51" WEST 26.58 FEET TO A POINT OF THE NORTHERLY Q BOUNDARY OF THE ABOVE DESCRIBED COMMUNICATIONS LEASE SITE AND THERE TERMINATING. SAID POINT OF \` • TERMINUS IS SOUTH 50'31'09" EAST 11.00 FEET FROM THE NORTHWEST CORNER OF SAID COMMUNICATIONS LEASE \` SITE \\ \• / / / / \■ \ \ BR st \ / / \ .\\ 11" OH / / \ \ Q PROPOSED TIMER=ATOM / / •�n•UOE: 12 =*11 wal/ . ` •• .• -1 L3- • / / \ / .\ y`/ N••1 N.•• fr A. a • •MO.1 ,y'4•••\ \ \ N \\ \ Sr CEDAR 'OD Qom.` N \ \ \ \ ••.•. •••. \ + "C . `\ \ ~~ ' ?'��,p� P 7 ~ Na�r�ad•dN•ImdE,6 M 1 enriaar Y0 72- STE WC NNE KM CRT 011ononle Ledpo) '14•!5! PO 4037C . N. N ? Rot•n ao•d .to TONT 370 1.4t =11 AOQO! 1]em:E►•r1RC l8M8 8 EVImR �\ • •• $�'r'1°\ .:•Tr *98)•m•..6 r.•TroN 11004 00 mm 01 \ \ \ 310 Net wtbdy NO 4*mot mt019 •* \ �••� leodl•.on top d.170 tee thee.Ile A\ \ aw.8 NAVIN.aad W 391 Not NATO ODE1t'S NAME: T19vd Mawdo Ldp.Ns 1)I(iM) 7I•ho Rrontaf**on(aoo d•we�7 >07 A . \` 1" \ a 1953 p�••iAD-8) .�•�•.ev a�ENS AoaN[a P.n e• z�mea F1�. ` La•M \ I..• �d..•�•�•en,e}(to tn•. T4�a vrt•l \ /3 -,0",/,.....______........,...- \ nor...MM/ \ NORM)aW two d•t•o9rd To M ASSEMONI1 PARCEL NUHJKS) ROOM. "Aloe/dotun 00sArto)so IT Nom of ir....mum C - n.r..d root. \ //_y��\ \ LET NEA OF IA .7710 PARIII(S); 11.0N AA THIS ISAVO1E IS 07TRIENTED N0 B TIE SC LE / \ -� \ AMRC PROPERTY THE wRCTt IT IS PRODUCED OCT NET MCA O'mom A lfh 9003 Sp Ft. SIMY TER USE 11 TIE 811(8 MO ITS NTEUTEI `\ \ NAME OF ILRSEYOI: MAIN A LEI SUIOOR REPR[Olrr101 tF USE THIS RAMC AID/Il ono \ \ GROUND EIEVAnat 176 NATO M VI11DU1 TIE VRI CE11 APERg 9 f 1 FIREMEN N\ \ MENSIRATEN Na: 200/ PACE N \ - SEIIOtlMO IL0.S MN.,.M"GARY \ \ LATITUDE & LONGITUDE MASS OF ELEVATION. NATO OIL N.0 MN.n,•rt SITE NNE \ \ SYMBOL DESCRIPTOR BATS 0 EARI10! QED I STAR[PLANE \ • 10(18495 PROPERTY CORNER SYS1E11 1110RT1�p AS LATE CORNER OBISERYAA OM AT$08 1/�CITY Ohmic Lodge) \\ \ T r UTELEPH0IE CLOSURE BOX NOTES STATEN'OIAY Its M I E �"�^� T \\ FIRE HYDRANT 1.LATITUDE tDNO1lO[APO GROUND REV/1110N TALI AT=TM SITE NLHBCR \ OF PROPOSED LEASE AREA \ 8 Ma SPOT EILVATOR 0 YaY FA1B Al LEAF[ORNER 2.MAGNUM MONTH DECIMATION 17401 AS PUBLISHED 9Y TE \ NATION. GEOPHYSICAL DATA CENTER(2000) PO -4037C 9>.R WIS AI9RITH NARK PO-4037C Fd 6/5"R A 2'9r(PS REFERDICE 1 110 S.(CCY DOES NOT CO61N1[A 508395007 MONEY OF THE • 0 O 0 0 0 0 0 -0 -0 - 0 o -0 0 -o O O PARENT PARCEL. MOMENTS O'RECORRD IOC FORD NO IE1D SUE ADDRESS - —P PROPOSED POTTER LIP FOR POMELOL 1TE 90UOA87 OF THE PNLENT PARCEL D COWED PL—PROP.LNE PARENT PARCEL FROM RECORD INFORMATION U990 FOUND MO•MOO18 FR COI1R0.. LEASE AREA UNE 13680 S.V. Pacific Highway 190.2) RECORD NFOMATON 4 OR LOCATION OF THE ETD M0 UNITY FACILITES HAS NOT SEEM RESEVI E. ME wNTRAC1oR SHALL CONTACT THE RFSPEClM Tigard, OR 97281 BUS - SHRUB UR1TY COEPAI 10 OBTAIN MORMATON REaNpO ENACT DEPTH TREE-DECIDUOUS CF ROIL AND$002 NTAL LOCATION OF UTILITY LIES PRIOR TO CO61NM'ilOL THE SLRVETC R ASSUMES NO IIE1pORISINUTY FOR BUSH-SHRUB THE ODJLATION O.00101 UNDERGROUND mums.NOR FOR TE E7051OIL=O'HUED OB.ECIS 0404 ARE NOT MOM ON 110 LMI. 1 aro TTTLE I —_ E DESTRO EASOENTS.0l0. MR.°AND E11C�nONS HAVE NW TOPOGRAPHY SITE SURVEY BEEN IOMOm. TOP Oyu OCIVAN1'HASJCI FlR•ALE PRELMNARY RILE REPENT. THE SMWHOR ASSMES NO REFOOEJTY FOR OOWUCTS OM DONE THAT MAD E REVEALED FRROE RICE WPM. • MET NIKIER LEGEND SITE INFORMATION 1 MDT SCALE 20 L 1 • Iv 1500 N.E IRVING SIHLLT, SUITE 530 NOTE: PORTLAND. OREGON 97232 NO WETLANDS, DRAINAGE WAYS, WATER BODIES OR RIPARIAN CORRIDORS FAX 503 e13-3014 FAX 503 736-3014 WITHIN 200 FEET OF SITE. ————PROPOSED NEW O NTOR ALL EXPOSED SOIL OR STOCKPILES SHALL BE SEEDED AFTER CONSTRUCTION — — —EASING COODIR(TO BE ROOTED) OR IF LEFT EXPOSED FOR MORE THAN 7 DAYS. STOCKPILES SHALL BE —1¢-PROPOSED SET MEOW SURROUNDED BY SILT FENCE INSTALLED 3-6 FEET FROM THE TOE OF THE PILE. .4-- ARROW SOON ON WEN CF DRAINAGE NOTE: NOES 15 NOT USED 12 .ROALLL CATCH° °R" PROTECT=PER DET L 7/C-1-w_Y NTH W MANARR / ' 1.ATTACH THE FILTER FABRIC TO 2.BACNFILL AND COMPACT THE �1 , ,.J POST AND EXTEND IT EXCAVATED sat_INTO THE TRENCH ' • ArN EXTENSION OF FABRIC At;f7 •\ ,\ / DE1 - ///sr•••\\,•♦..• c ♦\/ICI/I��/�//�/�/\ FOR ROAR. TEEM/PAD MA1 UBU COi5OUCSSO A19 THE CURRENT ECC '/ ! ��' 1 ` / '(4,w /``, V`�.�Nc.. POINTS A SHOULD BE HIGHER THAN PORT B HERAUUCS MANUAL. �� `\` I\ r+ . j ,�I;I I` {r\I‘I ��P1-�aT 2 ALL FORK PERTAPNN•10 1N5 PRQECf STALL BE 9O THE U RENT NSPECTION OOT BY ME s / SAY 4 ♦`�jSj�� : COUNTY N PECIOT OR IS DESIGNATED REPRESDNTAME PRIOR TO ANY _. `i7 Fr TER BARRIER N DRAINAGE WA`( CON57RUCTEW DE CTRACER SHALL CONTACT 111E COUNTY//SPECTOR TO �S � _ II gE p0�( SCHEDULE A PRE-CONSTRUCTER MIRK _ ` ��, 4 BY MEAD. TO(Nt�APPROVEQUAL) GRAaIC/IESC VOTES �, ›, / ��S 1. 7ESC CONTROL;FALSJ7E5 SHALL E CONSIRICED PRIOR ro ANT GRADING OR Sy��{��'.q}y`�Y / ��- EXIEN9VE NAND CLEARING N ACCORDANCE WM THE APPROVE➢TEMPORARY ��5 \ 144;01' EROSION/SEDIMENTATION CONTROL PLAN.THESE FAOUTES MUST BE SAMFAC70RLY W,i1��LM ` 1 �• '�. MAINTAINED UNE CCSTRUCIION AND UVOSCAP9M IS COMPLETED AND DE 111)6,14,10,;,""%,,i.01 .,..F \ f1�� A SILT FENCE DETAIL SCALE: NTS I p POTENTIAL FCR ON-91E ER09011 HAS PASSED. ,�/f-*-1)(_ t� z ALL ORAONO SHALL COMPLY 70 CHAPTER 33 OF ME UNIFORM BUILDING COOS :!"� . �� ' PPROPEERRIYOFSTHE AND IS PR DE 1 TEMPORARY ER051CM/SLTATICN CTROL(ESC)MEASURES SMALL BE NSTALLID y� / ,� ]�.Q SOEEY EON!U9:BY TIE O W NO ITS/NUKES. MAY BE USED SHORT TERM 4. ALL STREETS SHALL E KEPT CLEAR CF DUNS NO ENT.STREETS SHALL BE SEPT N. _ PRIOR TO ANY 911 SEIBC EEP NFOR A N USE OF MS MAIM BI0001 w/UTUTY wCRK ADD w/ -7 IMMEDIATELY MEM DOT HAS MEN TRACKED OIID PAVED SURFACES. 111E BIT ME NMI DI FIRED M R R E OME 11 PHASIOC OF DEVELOPNEDT ` \ AOMME 1!E YtlT1D1 FIREMEN 611E OrFlt . .. I I S MAR(IENNICE NO WAR 6 IESC IEA.a�SHALL M CONDUCTED YIFDU1ElY \� 'J lL SITE NAME UPON RECCE/DER OF A PROBLEM OR MEM ESC TEAS RF_S MCCUE DAMAGED. IIIIIII i is I I I I I I I I ■ I. SLUT MIT TESL/BIND MATERALS AND 9RPLES ro PROTECT TIE DI NE SITE SHALL - N I _ _ i. E s1oDPLm ON SITE MI Na CITY ' -- " WET SEASON GRAOfUS NOTES OCTAL/ IFET1¢PER -- - ...2L-.--- Rte■'■-"f, 1. THE CONSTRUCTOR SMOKE SHALL E MEWED 10 IRRIE ME AREA OF UN 1 ' STABEIffD SOL A MAXIMUM OF 1000=ARE FEET OF DIRT RILL BE EXPOSED AT l SHE NUMBER CATCH BASIN AREA DRAIN ANY THE 015 DTS z EARTHEN AREAS MAT NE%SECT ro txwTHmulnG SEDIEETS CNRNG STORM DENS AHD MERE EARN WENDS MS NOT NNT1CIPAIEO FOR 41 HOURS SHALL BE STAE73D M C MN THICK VIER OF STRAW MUM OR COWED MM PLASM PO-40pY-A Eck SEEE1NG70 PRF.VONT SR RUN-OE. jil /I„`/A 61\ ROw 1 MEM FF RN/FALL FRO/HS POSED(RNEALL HND EN Bo ro 70 HILLEt sEmma KKKIII FROM DIROSED ORi),ALL HARD Ewan DI EANRDI T SHALL C C0DIMDI ND (SITE ACCESS I OTHER CONSTRUCTER ACTIVITY SHALL OCCUR ON PERIAMS SURFACES DUNS PERIODS OF HEAVY RAN. at= j:,, FLDw aTCH BOTTOM E N 13880 SARI PACIRC HWY i1I . 1. TIE PROECT SIRES LOCATED AT 1950 NE CAMPUS WAY IMISloRO.CR 9/124 711E MARI% OR 97223 EXISTING 97E CONDFTIC N S NAIVE GRASSES ONER A MLL MANY SOL TYPE 9U6ACE COMM NO COSTING TOPOGRAPHY MEAN THAT CM MS SITE THERE N MERE PLAN , SECTION A-A Awstiss NO WITH DE DE 991E TIE APPEARS TO DRAIN L y� ;: �.;, FAST AND MERE S VERY UTIE IKAEAMBR OF WATER OVER THE%RENL THE ,� TIE DITCH INLET NNW PEWEE MANAGE AREA IS NTOTT COMM WIN SURFACE o s AM. PERCOLATE INTO DE C RU9ED ROCK AND asrERSE OW THE GROUND ,`N. EROSION CONTROL PLAN z ALL A PRCPRATE EEA9RES MUST E TAKEN TO ASSL RE THE PREVENTION CF ,`\ ER0901 DURING COSIRICIIOM FRO/THE SITE'METER OR NOT MET SEASON afwr NSW GRACED TAKES PLACE,ESAVATDN PIO CCERAQ OF ALL UNITY TRENCHES MU. ` OCC MIN 41 RS , R HO , C 1 DRAIN—CATCH BASINS SCALE: NTS 17 NOTES 14 EROSION CONTROL PLAN I 1 Into scam IA I • / ' 1500 N.E.NIRM(O STREET, SUITE 530 N If• _`. // \. POPHONE D 503 81 -9000 7232 1 9000 7232 1 / •\ FAX (503)736-3014 • / 'Ng. / • I ` i f \ • , / 27 I ''N. g �, k� ,,o,e O" W• p. / / r-A..a a mu �Ne rs[ zYF1sFF /� _/ / N / . � — / PROJ ECT AREA A. ,/ SEE SHEET A-2 FOR ENLARGED SITE PLAN PLAN -MAE . f-N ` .RTE / '\s., a/3Dp3 ZOOID REYEII -, / ‘..V.---; �I a / (('� _ �i \�:,T.�.T'CiL / �/.ON 4: PROPOSED ma:siR9.R y� / I I"", 7. RADIO EOIFPOR MINTED \ `GI / I \ To A 22-C x 15-O'x Y • RICK=CREW SUB-SEE 4,,r-"til I `. ` SHEET A-4 // - PROPOSED EAIOSCAPE / '• SEE SHEET E-1 REIOOS • �` 0EM� .� A]• ` ` A ' , • /� \ • / ' A � ! �) TLS lxU1RNC a COPYRIDHFD AND a THE SOLE Ti1!y / \ SOLELY Y FOIFOR 17 AE NO IN*FIU / S, I' ,,� R�ROOIFCaR a ASE OP ADS DRANK AND/ER �.. � ` ti \ S..... • nNw�rDIE 1wrtE�ly w cFaDIE oioE / '�\ t '`+ ; � +' -�xI� \ / O �/ ` `. 91E RASE PROPOM 100 TALL + �- \/ 10 909 'LOIS.1/Y rRONAL `. `--. '`� KIP1 CITY .(\ ANIMA PLA ON&SnucnnAL ANALYIS ONO 191111 OF RONOPOEL • ,� • RONOP0IE FOUOAIIOII ANTENNA • `. PLATOONS NO OEOIECINGL '� X. 91E WARIER \ ENaEDIIC WY MRS • • \ PROPOSED zr-4'I,0-C 10159 ENI LEASE AREA I .`1. S. 1 • • i \ (1179 ADDRESS' • \ 13680 SW PACIFIC HWY E .• N IIGARD, OR 97223 • ' \. • -- ----- 4 0- 0 o f 0 0 e o t 0 OVERALL SITE PLAN E E iIsar arm I i A-1 OVERALL SITE PLAN SLUE: 1/16•-Yd I 1 Elm NA@ ,:, x-s• s LNISC.APE RUM 1500 N.E.IRNNG 1mit.T, SUTE 530 PROPOSED g-0 TNL PORTLAND, OREGON 97232 CRAM 1111(FEN=WITH PHONE 503 813-9000 fY(»STRAND BARBED .' ' , FAX 503 736-3014 7. NRE AT THE HOP NO OQI YNYL PRIVACY SLATS-SEE��1 PROPOSED LANDSCAPE SEE S H E T 1.-1 t W 4 W W W . . W W W W W �/�W W W W W W W W W W W W W W W W W,.404 W W *W W W W *4. W !' � �� W W W �t W` ' S 51 c 1 ",A 1 � WW') , ,A N'� c W�,1 (1 � 1 (� ,1 ( , 1 ( < ( C l �W 1J W W W W W �� 1 'r ,' `+• r , N _. . _t' ., .O . ) W W 9r HMV -I " Ite WI WA MI' NM • .i t�L • •• •• •• •• •• •• •• •• •. r.•.d.OR 91214 W •I• W W W �I• / Ts svlrsTm I� _I Fs '.Y])2]F w �— 't4�� ERAONI QifE11T Y01M[D r yy CII • / W W l(��J�)+) TO 22-O'X15-0 X * W �1 4 0 INCH COMM SLAB-SEE g O W • W SHEET A-4 1. e N W W N. SECIOt NP 0 042, wpm.•O 15 TN / •---- /•CAume• i W r a >> ass 114 / Oi00i• i ♦ • ci.iP000...••••••e.•'►i i , # .,0 !•`4 •`•• O`4 • L`0" ! • O`4O.O •`•** i ∎ i . ',1",1,4) 1 0 O ,*.•.. ►•••••••••••••••►0 0`i`i`ii`Oi►i`i*`i`i`i`i:►`i`i:0*I/ :r T; O ••`•`�S!iO►O•'•O`O•`OP•`i`O•`i`•`s►04!•O`•' DO►`O••i`•`ODO✓•'f0!i`•' y, I _�0 I . `-* 10 1 ss a:s tlGtGGG--.-Geeaaasllsffste<G----Geea•alsss -Pi - 6 _ : _ ,d0000-------ILAIIIPIr, ,,' C., . , t, \ . / "V:V4,4""*"*".•••■!..."*".•••■÷4 il,0 01,•■•••..,•"•1.•■...,..e e,1.4.•..V.•1,4•• ,,-)er, v-/ PROPOSED(t)OlN)POIE / ••LU•••. •. w••• �.. ••.•... . . e••:•••. W W O WCEST ENI 0011FSS _ r i 4 �1 .� 00/X1/03 201.0 REHR 1 ' N11E111A5 NOIXIIFD RSgE A `I' `�' ( �1�' NEN aY1 tlF951FR AND ` t ' ' 9 1 Panto TO NATON DOSING I • - , T1 �' <\ J J MUM COLOR.TYPICAL Cr •lETe 1 1 0 b I W ,„ A (21 SEE g ••133 / W `ll''�`J)J) I NOIOPOE'POE MIL IE oE9om C• 00 I. ■� •I W W\ f'�' 1090 N NC LOAD,1/l RNXN. 0 !a'Y.�' -_ 1 0 W W RE•7M/MI NO A MAX K(� / MOM CMS. SZN OF NMC SUPPO W W ! (�i.1 0 ANALYSIS r DESIGN OF NONOPOIE, UtUIY RMSOl9 ! ) 1 YOIOPOE FOOIDATRXL NCM. � W W PlA11TX•6 AND OEOIEONOAL ,� 001000aIG BY O7FEILS �® • PROP45ED CQLtfAOAL ME1FR JANNNNNNNN■ W l > _ _��_ _ _ 0"� PROPOSED T00•-•TNL STEEL •! W W �� 1� _��^ 1 1 //•• ^_ '��\ �1 MI 10 00 OE POLE RL BE MIMED W W ' ) ^`� 1 1/'I !�'�` , K^ 1 �(N'�, /r•Y� T .^•'. PROPOSED Wan 10 90 IPM 1.O LONX 1/7 RAWL \ \ n` -- 1 1 7 TlT — — - ` PONFN SUPPORT CARNET HOE•751011 AND A MAX OF W W /� j'I.- , ( '‘-;')-', C ,� ( ' ' '•( ■ C h• `( L ' (L*' , �m D15 DRAPING IS COPYRIGHTED NOB 111E SOLE ANTUON PIANT:MID STRUCRRAl `- J , ` `ll (, �� `�J Ill'J J I�`� J J )I PROPERTY OF 11E OME'R. It S PRCOUCED NOICRQE FOIIIOAIXRA ANIEIMA .'-•v✓` - - -J ! `` _-4,, C`- o ...lii AA a..•✓� A SOLELY rot UM WI DE 09101 No ITS NnuT¢ ANALYSIS NO DESIGN OF 01011* W W W ;- :a�� _ '.- "-- ' IEPRWOC101 MI USE 00100 OG1MG N5/ON PLATFORM AND 0E01EO.9CK W W W W W J W y W W W FORECIDDI Esotool195 BY OTHERS + ,� / er CANE w THE INFINMATION DE WIN P i COI OF 11E W W W W W W W W W W W W W W W W W * W * W W W W 2i_0 X 2/-0.VOCESIREN1 SITE NAIL PROPOSED on o D • 3- LEASE AREA W W W W W W W W SECTOR MAMA'• SECTOR KIND CITY 2SS TN 'ALPHA'• 11. ` ,s 111,.....„...• /� • 43' SINE MIMEO!1111141. e . ills, ■5.-.3.'''•--.4%.1,41. It'"A'•••••••••• EMADIENT 7.-0. / • �� { ��1�!•1•r�f�l�t�t�G 4 aY-0• SIZE*0005 5 .: ® .......... '��•►••♦ EOIPIE)IT 51,18 PJi ! 13680 SIN PAgFlC HiNY ANTEttNA i1JICE AREA,(S) Ih. • FUME,(9)TOTAL: 71GAFtD• OR 97223 MOUNTED 10 NOV Y-0•1 of RE-MHO LONG 5110 ARMS-SEE ® SECTOR ) SETA •1. O 115' PLAN N • �' '� , -4• y ENLARGED SITE PLAN /' V- MEN ALL 9NER OMER OP110NAL ANTENNA MOUNT SCALE: ,/r-1.-6• A-2 ENLARGED SITE PLAN SCALE: 1/2.=f-r 1 Rom. ,;, NOTES 70P OF ANTENNAS 1.SITE PUN 6 FOR CONCEPTUAL NERMA1D AND N OILY A NOT 10 BE USED AS •100'-0"AGL+/- \ 2 1fl�'All PROPERTY LNE INFORMATION POOR ID E1QO CF MERE •100-0'AQ+ - \ Mr a 1500 N.E IRNNG STREET, SUITE 530 NA RAO-CEN__---- `PROPOSED 6 WAD POLE ANTENNA R PROPOSED(6)QUAD POE PORTLAND.PHONE (503)813-9000 7 2 32 44,r,„:+1/.9 -0"AOL+/- VOICES-IREAN)MNETE55 97'-0"ACL _ - _ ( ) NITE)NAS MOUNTED 119DE A ANTENNAS S AS�YWIIED RISD(A FAX 503 736-3014 NEW 24'0 CANISTER AND NEW 24••CANISTER AND PNNIED TO MATCH DOSING PANTED TO MATCH COSTING A BOTTOM CF ANTENNAS Z BUILDING COOL TYPICAL OF J�BOTTOM OF ANTENNAS / OMDMIG COLOR TYPICAL Of •94'-0"AGL+/- (2).SEE 0 sir O 94•-O'ACL+1- (2).SEE 401 A 6A 1+]0%SAYE M7214 MN P./1b'(Ux ``l MI T.(503)230- � Fac(503)235-7322 GIN II■ \ \PROPOSED toe-o•TALL STEEL PIRCPOSED 100.-0!TALL STEEL LENCPOLE POLL MIL BE DESG ED MOIIOPOLE POE MILL BE OES%YED 10 90 MPH I.D LOAD,1/2•RADIAL TO 90 IPH 10D LOAD.1/Y RADIAL ICE 0751/11 NO A MAX '(4) I(E•TS MPH ARO A MAA OF(4) ANIMA CANS STRUCTURAL ANIEl lA CANS.STRUCTURAL N1NY95 AND OE9E9I Cr MONOPOLE, ANALYSIS NO DESIGN OF MONOPOLE. MONUPOLE FOlRDA1DRL AN1EINA MONOPOLE FOLNDA710N,ANTERNA PLATFORMS AID 4E01EONCA/ PLATFORMS NO f,EOTECM4GL ENGINEERING BY 01lIERS ENONEETING BY OTHERS ■ Ii1FASC I 08 09/30/0.3 ZONING WADY IIII PROPOSED ICE s A EIRDQ- A_ PROPOSED lq(SSTREAY RADIO EWPYENT-SEE SHEET A-4 TIES ORA■NG IS COPIROPTED AND 9 DE SOLE PROPOSED PROPERTY W THE OVER. IT IS PRODUCED PROPOSED SI(11017 FNEW E-�T TALL SOLELY FOR USE BY NE MOT ANO R5 WW1'S REPROOUC110N OR USE OF IRIS DRAW AND/OR MD SUPPORT mum szEQ • THE NTOWATION CONTNIED N IT IS FORBIDDEN e �� IMIINOUT 9 INTNN PERMISSION OF THE MINER �i■�iiiiiiiiii9liii■�.iiii■�il PROPOSED 1'0. ''Lk v l 4�NNE I..■■■...■.■■■.■..■,�...■..■■ PtOPOSED GIPS ANTpNA-•.+00 .�i■L ■.u.■...........a.........I y'v1 I —.is..., �iiiiii.......l dill■.■■....■■■......%t■......►.� ) /1..•..•••1 M•.•....••••. 1••••••••■....•.IE....■o■.■■...I . iii..........■ KIP1a CITY /■IrO.........111 ..11........■......A■.■...��.■■ /Tw/,1' o a000 I1.1•.■EF UUUU it 11 r7.0....■.u....�..uu.��i�.��I �wl(FStTENP RAID �;, II. U 'l o:::,,g_.:aaaaaa as as a000 .E.'E1�R7■...LW: M1 •a000 000• •• •oo I 000ao0vo00oo00 ..illr.•..aN�•..ut,l Mt l�7 0000 ,-( E(R�YENT-SEE SHEET A-4 I 0avo 7y. I -�,[y.•000`o:t b • � friTti! 4 PAl� 0°0v°0°0°0 W BAR Ionnnn000ao■ 0a000000000000aaoa00•••. 911 ADDRESS 111/ '•' oo F�•vov0oo �i�1 ' ■7 "' 000vo0vvvvovoo••- .' .. ' 00000000 :�•. A:w yrt 111 II! 111 11111::N1111111111111111illlllllllllllll OOOa000aa00000a I,! 1,I ,!III �i aw q °oaaaaa•!I I ,' " -: �oaoaaaaaaaa •.?:a, ,_, EMI hi�iu�unuunnu iuumummiiuii.aaaaaaaa II II aoaoaooa0oavavava0aaoa 13680 SW PAgFlC HWY ! � I 1 000aa000000a 1'iI!'!I��IIIII IIIII VIII IIII j:i oaaaa aaaaaaa I I' I111i I i1l1il i °0a00000aoo0o000`0 ,„,l.(I �i! 1011 aa000o00000000 11 1111,y 1 0oaoa000000 -tA' A•^y Etil g x N I x 1 r °v0uvvovvv000000 51-1011 1h11 111: 'i�oa aaaaaaaaaaaaaa ;:��??% 'N04,1l1':yl( Eil1=iir`Ii�) 11 3i�1 ills I killl I °o'7 5 I I i I t•, i�r 0000°°ooaov0000 ”-^?' :pa•.:1 11 11111:1111:�1N.li :TIN•:IIII:I:i1: I 0000000000 0000v0v0ooa00000oa LEFT 111 1 aaaaaaaoaaaaaaaaaa 0000000 000000 000000 00000a00n0ac0 ELEVATIONS 000000000vv00 •0 00000000000v00a 0032 0000000000 PRCPOSED 91E p 9EE7 NMI" SIGN- g A-3 SOUTHEAST ELEVATION SCALE 3/16'-r-o- 12 NORTHWEST ELEVATION SCME: 3/118.1'-0P I 1 PLOT MALE I:1 NOTE: NOTE i • CONCRETE fc' 2500 P9-N0 SPECIAL INSPECTIONS CONCRETE k'.2500 pSI-No SPECIAL NSPC110115 REWIRED.ARCHITECT OF RECORD REOUESIS REOURED.ARCHITECT CD RECORD REQUEST'S CONCRETE TO BE k'•7000 P9 CONCRETE TO BE tc'-3000 P9 1500 N.E.(RANG 5IK11T, MITE 530 PORTLAND, OREGON 97232 PHONE (503)813-9000 FAX (503)736-3014 NOTE: uT%1Tr/TASN LICIT NOT I—NOOA'GEN 3.OITUOOR Y%Y ANCLE-ATTACH NTH 010M4 FOR CLARITY I RADIO CABINET 1/Y U BOLTS 9N. CTS ANTENNA-YE g I a 0 CAPPED BASE 9KE PPE COLUMN AT CORNER-HITS Wf-126(ICE DFDLF SUPPORT) ICE ITRDCE-(7)24•HIDE SAFETY I' CRATED GUIDE POLICE OIA .CR AIPRa1FD-MT s�_ _ ... rYe crno •1 2 TOR RECEPTAOLE N3•%3'ANGLE-ATTACH q Ntn1{F�7R�5(7T SN =pa '' r1•.. u BUTS DABROWSKI PDYEit/TFICO A \\ 91PPORT CABINET 1 _ Yr SCR 40 PHA;CONDUT TO °°°°'4 a n2+. • ... COIAIRET:3/4'3JLTNNT FLEX i�OW)2.>o-TSn /" w t'�1 2JF)]2 ! II TSCO I MINI eau AND RABID * !y •N�...•aN...v� . n BBU I RADIO ' B w or 17-0'x 15'-0'x r 7MCf r.. - ENT 9JIBP9 m • WAY REBAR 0 24'0/C EALN • f e RADIO WAY - r•�2 _ ` yy ` 1'CBNfER-ALL DOES • ....... ..... ...r ..3- lo ' MOUNTING BASE; PROYEED BY OTHERS NO INSTALLED BY COITRACTCR Iii DATE 09/30/53 ZONING REVIEW WEST EQUIPMENT SECTION SCALE: 1/2•-r-.o• 13 NORTH EQUIPMENT ELEVATION SCALE: 1/2••r-o- 1 NOTE CONCKETE f'-25c0 P9-NO SPECIAL f/9'ECTDNS cr c 9'-T1' 1 -5" REQUIRED.ARCHITECT OF REED REQUESTS CONfJ�TETC--Z� CONCRETE TO BE k'-3000 P9 rCwt�YC T(1 van trT Y-11' 6'-Y 6'-S 0 0 0 0 0 0 • 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 • • MOONS O Na DANE • [S/ ' Si �k 17• A P NIE EOUPEIT• CAPPED BASE 910E 2)Y%Y%1/4' O t1 COLUMN AT CORNEA-MIS GENETS PROVIDED S-PC 93PPORTS par-12S(ICE BRIDGE AND INSTALLED BY TINS OKAYING IS COPYRILHIID AND IS 11(SOU 91PPOR1) OTHERS O ^ PROPERTY OF THE OWNER IT IS PRCOUCED SIE EY PER USE BY TIE MINER ND OS PIRATES. • s s r. .z s:s•.• z s—.. ——•• • • ••• REPRCOUCTla OR USE OF THIS DRUIDIC NO/OR /�' \ �1�.i�•:1�1••1�.•••111 1 �4�14i•.•.1�4�•••01.1•r►1♦ / 111.1'��1•��•1•••••••1•••�1•/•♦/1. •4.114111.f♦11..•.•A♦1.4 1.• THE NFORIIAII wain PERIED N IT b fOIR%1001 �� ♦111111.1. 1111/1•,11111111111►1•♦ ♦♦4 ♦1111111111.1••♦♦..• 4.111111.1111111 A 1.1.1.{.1.1.1 � *imam MITTEN PERI/59M ff WE ONCE / ••♦.1.4 ■r•••••�.•1•1❖•.••..111e1e:.a 1e11s 1 11.11.1.1.•.►,r1 11.�0.11 111�111.•�1�1r.?•11��.•_.•1•!.42r1.t❖1�117►;11;11.0�• • • / O ♦•.•. x1. 11 .11 . X1.1x 4♦1111. ♦.•••• .1 • 11 O .•N 0*.•:0 ■1•1.10 x11•1•.•1•11*1111 **1 —�F `,4 (91E NAPE • A I ° ?•P••4.• s't♦14_ P•11 r` .._ 14• 1 C '?S 114 •.111•••••x•..•114 .•..•11x1111111.11.4•.. • \ O �•�•�� iii xi'O•�•�•1•�•1•�x�•�•�•�•�•�•��i x•�i�ii1iiii•Oiiiii0•iO�iiixilii� \ •./►..r•.1........•.11•r'111.•..11111.11►1•►... KING CITY ° ' •••••'�••••--•----------=�..•. 4�..�tee•..•-'•'+=°'-►•----•-' —. ••••••❖►•.a❖..•.,.+,1J.,'1.,.,..:., ;`1.1.•,1•••4: 11:16,414:41.•:••.*:�•.•.. 3 • — -- �y �1 IRE MAWR o • PO-4037-C WS ANTENN g n. O 9R ADDRESS UTUTY/TASK = 0 13680 SW PACIFIC HWY • SUPPORT 71GARD, OR 97223 l-zi 0 • o O o O O o o •• N LEFT HIRE EQUIPMENT DETAILS / Y-6" 1-6" Y-6" Y-6' 5'-0' 1d-0. 1_7 Z IF 23•-0" 6.' MET MEa SOUTH EQUIPMENT ELEVATION scmi: 1/Y- r-1Y 14 EQUIPMENT PLAN A-4 SCALE: 1/2•_ 1'-0• I 2 PLOT SCALE ,, • MIIESAL"(016 GPS ANTENNA NOTES 1. CONTRACTOR TO NOTIFY PROJECT MANAGER OF ANT cSCREPANCIES NTH 111E ANIEMIA- PROPOSED LAYOUT PRIOR TO PROCEELNG . AROAAT/VIC-100. I.LOCATE IV PROVIDE 111E WEST POSSIBLE VIEW C<THE SKY 2 DKEC110NAL 2 ALL PIPES BRAQ(ETS.PLATES CWECTORS AND MSC HARDWARE TO BE Ua T USING SS (A TREE CR BUILDING CAN BLOOC 9NALS Frew TI(SATELLITE:) ANEL ANTENNAS HOT-DPPED GALYAMIID UNLESS O1/ERMISE NOTED. CPS ANTONIA SCREM5 PR01DED 1500 N.E.IRVINC STREET, SUITE 530 - YON 2 A YNNUM OF IMO FEET FROM ALL UGHTNNG RODS AYENNA NDTFS PORTLAND, OREGON 97232• ItDvs11 S FS 316 OR �I/�(,y,S ANTENNA CABLE 15.TN 1. ALL N11DNA AND COAXIAL ANTENNA CABLE TO BE FURN9IED BY KICESIREA1d AND PHONE (503(813-9000 EQUAL ' "'TALC T 1 CLEAR OT R(MAN LOBE OF THE PS TRANSMTTNC ANTENNAS / "(STALED BY CONTRACTOR FAX 503 736-3014 2 CMx COLOR COON./ANIEINAS 19 BE MADFRm N A CLDCKNSE PIPE 0 PIPE MOUNTING AA YANI(R FROM TRUE NORTH AND E E COOED AS FOLOWSc D1-MIS PMT P3B-SlO�_ IV. \ /� SECTOR AXIFMIA OE9GNAlldl-COIDR CCONG r ■ 1111/11119.1 6 75i 0R 270 DEGRFFE.S N ANY ORECTDN. AIPBA SECION(l5) AI - 1 RFD BRIO ICE BRIDGE ANQE-SEE O 7 r COAx SHEET A-5 W. A4 - 4 RED BIDS STRAP CABLE 1O PPE. 2 DHRECIIONAL RATE CABLE MOM ANR ANTENNAS BETA SECTOR(1351 Bl - 1 BLUE BAD IO ICE BRIDGE TO RADIO �� OBSTRUCTIONS MUST -V. +ni•. R -. 7/B'f COAX CARNET BELOW 15 DIRTIES PANEL ANTENNAS G 84 - 4 BLUE BANDS 0 0 %%// 255'TN (I: GAYAr.SECTOR(135'f C - I MATE BANG \\1.3,5•TN 7/B• \ G4 - 4 PPE RAIDS _ •"• I RE MOW COAX COLOR CODNC APPLES 1O SECIOIZED SITES 'Wi. CPS ANTENNA % FOR OM SITES 415E THE ATO,810,GTO COLOR CODES ONLY VOICESTREAM ARIENNAS, SECTOR SITES: (8)PANEL AI1ENNAS-((12))COAX RUNS STANDARD 1-1/2'0 EM ARMIN& NC- (6)TOTAL IT.(3)NTUAE, SECTOR SITES (9)PANEL ANTENNAS-(10)COAX RIMS GALVANIZED PPE ARGIAT/NC-100 NOTE INA'S REVD (9)TOTAL �JD E Q�1 • ��SUPPORTS 15 DIRTIES TIP (I) 4. COAX SHALL 8E TAGGED NTH COLOR CONIC AT(2)PLACES VW 1'ICE [L<L.tll lJ -� „ STANDARD Yr fY ELT • M WEATHERPROOF COLORED VIM TAPE.AT THE FOLONNC LOCATION./ O -, _ GALVANIZED STEM /I AT ANTENNA CONNECTOR 29. AT ENTRY 10 EHIl11PP6NT CARNET 1V�N,A a •7214 I� _/ SHEET A-4 Fat I / S RUI coN9AL CABLE MTN MNMIN 12'Shat 12'FROM EDGE 1x'EOIPLIFIIT ;r143.2° ( � _ SPECIFIED NDGHfi CABA(I5,ACROSS WAVE QAOE t9.0DGE•IF YOIOPaE or OISROBUE TD FAG7 .IN.w.ry,w<,yer„ SIDE MEW NITEENA OEMCF. MIA91 AEC NSTAL YNI AM CIF(3)GROUT➢AT5 PEA COAI9AL CABLE PER FLEC1Rx'AL DRAwNLS YEAFY MMBER OF ANIFINAS CAME. ANO CANE RAIETEA MTH PROJECT MANAGER GPS MOUNT SCALE: N.E.S. 17 CPS ANTENNA SCALE: N.T.S. 4 ANTENNA AZIMUTH DETAIL SCALE: N.T.S. I 1 ICE ERIDGE SUPPORT BRAOCET: MTS/RIB-L824-3,Tr.OF(3) 4•NNW MAX A. ATTACH ICE BRIDGE INN To TONER td-d OC MAX 3 ROLE 1911111 BOX BY RED 7-d MAX 91PPLED HARDWARE NOTE —ICE BRIDGE SUPPORT BRAC(ET: 'TERMINATE COAX 7 1Y FLEW WW1' DOT'HH31LY w/BlAN1R COVER t}} MIS/A�L824-1 TYP.OF(3) i'r EYT-TIP ICE - FROM EDGE O I ATTACH ICE BRIDGE A:1H NOM N. �'-�. (1)M'RIDE SAFETY GRATED PAD. T 36'oC MAx , pp SUPPLIED HARDWARE PURCHASE AND SLOB( / WAVE GUIDE BRIDGE CHANNEL. ; I a ICE _ SPARE LAMP INSIDE Al R12 — CR APPROVE.➢-Yfi 0 �V r — /I�--Grn 7 r(1)24'HIDE SAFETY CRATED CONTRA I T STRAP-TYP 7 G-F�/ WAVE GUM FRIDGE CHANNEL CONTRACTOR 19 APPLY 3009 DECORA1M STANDARD 3'r ��• L I J OR APPROVED—Mfi/AB-CY21D ALL MATERIALS T ,E GALVAMZE.D STEER LARGE COAX•••I' J PPE-DIF(CT BURY.-If BLOCKS 7/IF MIS SUPPORT I REIN 259.60HZ BY m _BET iD ti'-d /CO-7a.:1-5/Yr- 'Q CS.ULN NTS II }II O�R�LPIAR RNC CORP. BRIE .32: 32L /C8-158L YERFY MTN -,-C- =L_ AE-130.SEE 09/30/03 ZaaD REVIEW PROJECT MANAGER SHEET A-4 FOR 1 �I,1 SPECIFIED LARGE COPS SUPPORT _ - — HEIGHTS ,--ICE BRIDGE SUPPORT ANDREW KITS BLA(MS 7/B►�Yfi CQW1t Yfi'1F-130 /f9-7tL 1-5/B'rs (CAPPED),SEE 9661 A-4 m •i 1� (EA01 COAX ID BE -1511.KREY NTH FOR SPECIFIED HEIGHTS 1` 0 acme(RADE GROUNDED NGMWALLY) �_ PROECT MANAGER. J,, LIGHT SWITCH "(STALLED BY i'tl GROUND BAIL;SEE 1 SELF-TAPPNG SCEMS CONIRACTCR GtCl/O °RAVI IGSL ro GROUND RING (2 EACH TOTAL) Quw"(cs 1r.x z4'OED GI RECEPTACLE CONCRETE F001Nf; ro GROUD RING atom TO DRAM TYACfL (C i'DI� TYPICAL I' i" TD GROUND NON; ' 11 X9100 I I 1 �_ S ` Emu 12r x 40'DEEP j'` I 'C.1, 1' T CONCRETE � Lr•.. y :I 1.` .4 FFUU�� ryryF1 Iiir f1 TYPICAL MAO TOO POWER I FRONT ELEVATION TARS ORAINC S COPYPo;9./7m AND 611E 5OE PROPERTY or THE COMM IT IS PROOII® SOLELY PER USE BY 11E OILER Nil 119"(RIMES NOT USED SCALE: N.T.S. 18 WAVE GUIDE BRIDGE SCALE: 1/2' = 1'-O" 15 U I1UTY ASK UGHT SCALE 1 2' = 1'-D" 2 REPRODI1CT10N OR USE Cf 176 ORATOR AND^" /T / 116 I(OR MAID"(CONTAINED N IT 6 FIMENDOEN MAHOUT 11E MITIDI PERIIFSSIOII O TIE 04469. ( s 1x6 BOX TOP NOTICE 191E NAM J f WOOD SLATS -- - 4•-lf GALVANIZED POST CAPS NOTICE 1-TvIc.AL� 2' STANDARD STEEL d ac I— K,N C3 CITY FENCE POSTS. TYP 2'x 4' PT TYP <(T)>n_7 FENCING SHALL BE I T1NEAQIEAOFAWTE Z • I_� BOLTED TO GATE FRAME 2 3/8'SCH 40 GA FENCE z. __ i OR SMPSON 'PRY POST SET IN CONC(TYP) 11E1111111111111111111 111111 �! oOMyd,�dslim. IMMnN1AtbMeuthenist SITE NUMBER GRIP TYRE ATTACH EACH WOOD SLAT OMSIILISdH9I119IMIIIHLAIdIw. .'�. III WITH 2 - 1 5/8' TYPES �e Frequency WoMInN9NS o IYL4YL IMiLr�AIM d]Avg a»nnwA NA BUGLE HEAD GALVANIZED r ab Me+ek 01a F'eleE Man rM4eLIa r SIMPSON "PRY PIPE SCREWS 0 EACH LATERAL wgIFYI r�,�5 � Od14..11104.2 Nln/an.��a �- -' SE AEORESS /' I 111 RIP TIE. TYP - - _ - - 'I CEDAR FENCING o ` b 1�� WOOD POST ADAPTORS 13680 SW PACIFIC HWY :11 (1 EACH LATERAL) 'r \ TIGARD• OR 97223 `��'��ee91' ATTACH 1MTH 4-1/4'x2' IN CASE OF AN EMERGENCY GALV BOLTS WITH _ _ CALL I WASHERS COUNTERSUNK ° 0 EACH LATERAL iii111"911i11111■11111 11■111 1- r NOM VOICESTREAM WIRELESS 91EET RILE 1 I 1 s S�,N. GR. 1-888-662-4662 '• 199 MATERIAL- CONSTRUCTION DETAILS ■E 2'x4'P.T. n:i 18GA AUNINU11 Site NIX P0-4037—C t �, CONCRETE%� 18Y . r. rt Site Name: KING CITY CONCRETE .' ;:e.: r• , 9fET NUMBER FENCE POST SCALE N.T.s 19 STANDARD GATE DETAIL SCALE 3/16' = 1'-0' 6 SITE ID SIGN SCALE: N.T.S. 13 ROT SCALE: R,1 • e I IKVWVWf 1500 N.E.IRNNG STREET, SUITE 530 PORTLAND, OREGON 97232 PHONE (503)813-9000 FAX (503)735-3014 SYMBOL DESCRIPTION QTY NOTES: , . 1) ALL PROPOSED PLANTINGS ARE DROUGHT TOLERANT. y , , ' ' y TREE IRRIGATION IS REQUIRED. i itti PROPOSED NEI WRPIC-'ACM 2) All PROPOSED PLANTINGS MU.BE WATERED BY LANDSCAPER y i y i y i mane mum I-Y 4 fat A PO.OD DP ONE YEAR FROM INSTALLATION TO INSURE y y , r^, •, CALIPER ESTABL191BENT OF PLANTINGS ,(-if , 3) ALL DEBRIS REMOVAL 6 TO BE DOLE BY THE CONTRACTOR ` , , • l.. NEB/EDGE 1EsTE N PoIODOODERpr- ALL REQUITED MONO COYQ PLANTS ND SHRUBS MUST BE OF q. y , i 1Q10000DURON MACROPNftLUir S GALLON , PROPOSED NEW HEDGE SUFFICIENT 92E AND PRIMER 10 MEET 11E REBUKE/STANDARDS PROPOSED NEW TREE•yE B2E SPACED AT 7-d 0/C M.SEE PLANi11C ry S1UN RHOOOOOImRON• mist(3)YEARS Cr PLANTING WLLOl(AS A GROUND MDR)MUST YAPIE'-• 414" DETAIL/S TMS BEET y y f K(D f -•INWO ENDREN 31* DE OWNED TO AIEAS I1NaAEATN PLANTS AND IS NOT A ORGANIC-;OMB 2-Y 1 Of / rrrry,^ �/' 5 ) THREES MAYBE WJ01iS a E DECOUars TREES Ar C"L� ly��,'! • SPAaD AT S-0.0/C M THE a PUKING IR6T BE FULLY BRANDED.TREES PUNTED N ALL f • 2DFS OTHER 1WN RFSDEN1W.MUST BE A I I OF(3)LADES •� PROPOSED NEW MOUND M ITIAl1E1UL I.-.• COYER•E141WD GAMILY- PROPOSED NEIL-, , N.o:5:.CALrCI1mEY -�57E•Ir 0. 336! uwET•-1R6US , ` / • . EAa my MEMOS RE CALICNODFS / .::::::. 5-0•LANDSCAPE BITER ,-GALLON SEX•tr 1 W rr - •.. • • AREA 0.c FADR BAY i ° i i,l ) COMM TIE 5-0. _LA2,' ��..,••• • 1A1O5CAPE BURET I i y • r AREA t LANDSCAPE LEGEND NT. •*1: ;'f'K / I I I 4 ::5 ,r x/83 ZD•D AEYEW � PROPOSED NETS 1REE•MIL i , • , i i t► ' I '+ !�' 1 ♦O • 'MAPLE'- If7lOATW•1NMY 2-Y ' i , • , ?7°;�)` \\ 'tZf , ' `,:.:�' ' " i i Al I 4%, CALIPER y y 2C_, ; •-i��` f lit- :y , i PROPOSED NEW IENE -� ' Il1O7i 'tea IlfArAel- - •ORM. RIIm=DDORDr i , 4 y A �+.. C� \` ��J r 1.. y • i ��- ` -'IBDOOOODIt01 , a ' i s\ . ^yl.N\ � y y Al— YAGR DDLOGI R S f,YlOM Wt` SOF SPACED AT 3.-0.0/C ` )1 1• 1 A_IN . R�� M. y -' vI i _ prio i y � ► F1 f PR OBE SLAB , 4 i 1,. lr ) DNS pGWNG 6 COPIWWIFD AID 611E BOLE �� Fr:ft ' AT TREE SLEEVE / / .a..4. �� L^x � / PROPERTY OF THE OMER. IT 6 PRODucED �� AT TREE I _ % ^3\ / ` • Boob FOB ulE By TIE 0•D,AND m AEN IEP �^/� r� i y • ,•N. ' 4, rr,1 1 - • • /: REPRGRUCIIOM a USE a 1M5 OWING/ID/a•\ J/B•DUl NYLON ROPE �#0 1�• y y y y,U)1 1_ \` rr9� i i DC B I IYAIIDI I PERMS N R 6 FOIBIDODI ' ,% \y , i /+,; r nNalr,IE WNTid PFIBBSBW OF„E OMEIt Ai* STAKES(DRIVEN 42•INTO �\ 1 \ y t.e .f,, 1,1 , i i / 91E XNIE UNDISTURBED SC& C- ettit ., i ` "- y i ,I I•/01 i. WNRAUM y . y 1 , i(THREE LOCAIONS) ` / /,� i- y y y KIND CITY i I �■ y i i i i y y y , walk V �_� _-' •rA y , y , ,t I SHE MASER I J �� * i P0-4097-C "11=11=,I=II=11-, './. /"ir / I��11��11��11��P(111111' II�I II 1111 //// ... IMP- //,..-le ��-r. �¢ Sit ADDRESS 11=11 11=II=11= / / I�I111i I, 111111I�111 //// // 11-11=11=11=11 II II 11111 II-II=1 /j /j // 11=11=11= 11=11- i II 11 //// / /7-11-11-1' 11 11 11=11=11=1 i I. //// ///,11=11=11=11=11=11 136E0 SW PACIFIC HYPY 1=11=11- 1=11=1 ////// _ //// :II=11111111.11111=II 1=11=11= / / / / / 11=11-I 11=11=11'11=11= 11=11=11, / / / / 11=11=111= =11=1 //// ////-11111111'.11=11=1 11=11=L //// ////1=11=11=1 X1 =1 TICARD, OR 97223 II-11=11=11-11= ''''''//// / /-II=11=11=11=11=1 11=11=11= . . / / -11-11-1 11=11=11=11=11 I 11 II 11 11 11 11=11=1R / / / 11=11=11 111=111=111=111111-x ///////,';';., ii II II II11 II11=1II -11111111 i //// /-/ / / / 1=11=11 -11=11=11=11=I'-N-_ / /=11-11=11=11=11= 11=11=N--.. / / ////-• Ilp II =11=11=11-11=+11=11-a=,.=11=,. /.,=11=11=11=11-11-1 1=11=11=11•=11-K=1.-.. /-.1=11=11= MET 118E -11=11=11=11=11-111=11=11=11=11-II-II=11=11=11=1 11=11=11=11-4=11=1111=11=11=11- =11=10=11=11-11=11=11=11=11=11=11=11=11=11= =11,II-1�II-If-II-II-11-11- -1=11�111,A11II�I i111111i 11�1111i 11�1 II III 11 ._ =1:=11=1=11= LANDSCAPE PLAN '- -11-11-II-11-II-II-II- IEDOE ROOT BALL TREE ROOT BALL p/ 105S AND FE RL=SO L PEATIOSS AM) E1UED SOl IMMURE I NT M0m I MIXTURE UNDISTURBED EARTH \ S' UNOISMtBED EARTH TREE & HEDGE PLANTING SCALE: N.TSI 5 PROPOSED LANDSCAPING PLAN SCALE: 3�.1.-0.I 1 _ ( -' I PEOr•DBe ,:, ADDITIONAL DOCUMENTS 4/26/2004 ,�� Conditions Associated With 5:4/26/2004 TIDEMARK Case #: SDR2003-00018 COMPUTER SYSTEMS, INC. Condition, Status Updated Code Title Hold Status Changed By Tag Date BY 1 NOISE STDY FRM CERT CONSULT/ENG None Met 4/26/2004 MET 4/26/2004 MET v 1. Prior to issuance of site or building permits,the applicant shall provide staff with a noise study from a certified consultant or acoustical engineer that illustrates a design that ensures that any noise creating device used by the project does not exceed the allowable levels in TDC Section 18.798.060(B)(8). The study shall be governed by the prescribed techniques in TMC Section 7.40.140. The projects accessory systems must be constructed to meet the prescribed standards and shall be so reflected in the construction drawings. 1 LEGAL EVIDNCE TO ESTBLSH JNT ACCS None Met 4/26/2004 MET 4/26/2004 MET ` / 2. Prior to issuance of site or building permits,the applicant/owner shall provide satisfactory legal evidence, in the form V of deeds,easements,leases or contracts to establish the joint access. 2 1 / REVISED SITE OR LANDSCAPE PLAN None Met 4/26/2004 MET 4/26/2004 MET / 3. Prior to issuance of site or building permits,the applicant/owner shall provide a revised site or landscape plan that ��/// shows: A. The addition of two medium to large sized street trees(minimum 2-inch caliper size at planting)along SW Pacific Highway,as approved by the City Forester. B. The plan shall also include a hedge of narrow or broad leaf evergreen shrubs in the areas with gaps along the southern boundary which will form a continuous screen of the height specified in Table 18.745.2 within two years of planting. C. A minimum of four additional evergreen trees, 15 feet in height at time of planting. These trees may be used as part of the screening of residential properties to the south(additional evergreens may be necessary to fully form the continuous hedge as described). 1 REV S-PLN MIN 30'UT THE EXCS 12" None Met 4/20/2004 MET 4/20/2004 MET 4. Prior to issuance of site or building permits,the applicant/owner shall submit a revised site plan that shows a di, minimum of 30 feet between the proposed utility trenches and any existing tree in excess of 12 inches diameter. This plan shall also indicate that"Should encroachments into this 30-foot zone be necessary,the applicant shall consult with and obtain the CityForester's approval prior to commencing work." ADDTL LNDSCP MATLS INSTALLED None NOT MET MET --3/T2/201 - DLW2 5. Prior to final building inspection,the applicant shall ensure that the additional landscaping materials, as conditioned have been installed. Staff shall perform a site inspection to ensure that gaps in the screening along the southern boundary have been adequately planted. 1 NOISE LVL BELOW 50 DBA/DY 40/NITE None NOT MET MET 3/12/2004 DLW2 6. Prior to final building inspection,the applicant shall provide documentation confirming that the noise levels in decibel ratings for the proposed radio cabinets are below 50 dBA(day)/40 dBA(night)measured at the property line. 1 SEC LTE/MOTON DET LITE INSTALLED None NOT MET MET 3/12/2004 DLW2 7. Prior to final building inspection,the applicant shall ensure that a security light or motion detector light is installed to illuminate the rear of the property. This light shall be shielded to prevent light trespass onto adjacent properties. 1 Page I of 1 CaseConditions..rpt l` CS ACOUSTICAL ENGINEERING 28 Wednesday January 2004 Fir--- h Office: 833 SW Eleventh,Suite 808 Project: T-Mobile PO 4006 Raleighwood WT IV' Portland,OR 97205 SW Canyon Drive, Beaverton, OR 503/227-6233 CSAE Project No.: 04-04 Fox: 503/227-4863 Procurement#: POR-0000003743 01/09/2004 Mailing: PO Box 3413 Portland, OR 97208-3413 MO(6 Asti Mr. Dave Fisher T-Mobile USA c`` c7 r.t..e 4-- VoiceStream PCS I LLC-Portland S 1-t,It Si to 1500 NE Irving Suite#530 Portland, OR 97232 Subject: Environmental Noise Impact Review of the Proposed Raleighwood Cellular Transceiver Station Installation Located on SW Canyon Drive(at SW Ridgewood Ave.), Beaverton, OR. Dear Mr. Fisher, Introduction... Per your request an evaluation of existing ULTRASITE cellular transceiver sites was conducted on 13 January 2004 to document noise levels at the discharge grilles of equipment at two locations--- Sorrento Ridge WT site near Murray Road Beaverton and the Irvington WT Portland site. Data gathered at these sites were used in predicting noise levels at the proposed Raleighwood site and to confirm compliance with the Department of Environmental Quality State of Oregon Noise Control Regulations. The noise source is a 1-bay transceiver ULTRASITE unit mounted on a concrete housekeeping pad on grade, and with air intake and exhaust louvers. Measured and Predicted Noise Data... The Table on the following page lists octave band and overall noise levels for existing equipment at the Sorrento Ridge WT and Irvington WT sites, the measured existing ambient noise at the Raleighwood site and the prediction of noise for the new installation. Plan and site drawings provided by T-Mobile were reviewed for this noise impact project. Table II lists existing ambient noise and predicted noise levels for the Raleighwood WT new site. Measurement Equipment... A digital spectrum analyzer manufactured by CEL(Type I Precision, 1/2" condenser microphone)model #593 was utilized for all noise level measurements .... and calibrated as required by ASA and ASTM. RE cE1\1E) .APR 2 2 2004 - art ol3ixtioNeretlesetsitav3P4RD G Mr. Dave Fisher ' T-Mobile --Voice Stream Raleighwood WT Site Environmental Noise Review 28 January 2004 Page 2 EXISTING EQUIPMENT SITE NOISE LEVELS Measured 1/3 Octave Band Centers Sound Pressure Levels Table I 13 January 2004... The Sorrento Ridge WT Site--- Beaverton. Level Description dBA 32 63 125....250 500....1,000...2,000 4,000...Hertz(frequency). Ambient 11:00 am: Leq 54.0 53 60 52 51 49 45 34 33 dB SPL L10 57.2 dBA SPL L50 53.5 dBA SPL L99 51.7 dBA SPL. ULTRASITE transceiver equipment noise levels measured at louvers: Leq 59 55 60 64 55 53 49 42 33 dB SPL The Irvington WT Site---Portland NE Skidmore Street. Level Description dBA 32 63 125....250 500....1,000...2,000 4,000...Hertz(frequency). Ambient 12 Noon: Leq 50.0 54 57 57 48 44 37 28 25 dB SPL L10 52.3 dBA SPL L50 49.4 dBA SPL L99 46.6 dBA SPL. ULTRASITE transceiver equipment noise levels measured at louvers: Leq 55 55 60 53 50 48 48 42 33 dB SPL RALEIGHWOOD NEW EQUIPMENT SITE NOISE LEVELS Measured 1/3 Octave Band Centers Sound Pressure Levels Table LI 13 January 2004... Raleighwood WT Site. Level Description dBA 32 63 125....250 500....1,000...2,000 4,000...Hertz(frequency). Ambient 10 p.m.: Leq 53.0 47 48.5 47 47 47.5 45 33.5 30 dB SPL L10 57.0 dBA SPL L50 48.0 dBA SPL L99 45.6 dBA SPL. ULTRASITE transceiver equipment predicted noise levelq at the closest adjacent noise sensitive properties: Leq 23 17 30 23 20 18 18 12 03 dB SPL Mr. Dave Fisher T-Mobile -- Voice Stream RaIeighwood WT Site Environmental Noise Review 28 January 2004 Page 3 Department of Environmental Quality Noise Regulations...and the predicted WT site noise levels... Current noise regulations require that noise levels are not to exceed the following steady state octave band noise levels from 10 p.m. to 7 a.m. at the closest residential property line(40 feet horizontal distance at Raleighwood) from the intake/discharge louvers. Table III.... Description dBA....32 63 125....250....500....1,000...2,000...4,000...Hertz DEQ Noise Regulations 65....62 56 50 46 43 40 37... dB SPL Raleighwood WT site predicted noise 23 17 30 23 20 18 18 12 03 dB SPL Raleighwood site existing ambient noise levels 10 p.m 53 47 48.5 47 47 47.5 45 33.5 30 dB SPL Noise Impact Predictions at the Closest Residential Property Line... Considering line-of-sight noise propagation the cellular transceiver site is exceptionally quiet. The noise is below the existing ambient noise at adjacent residential property and will not increase same. The present day ambient noise is louder than the proposed CEL site installation. The CEL site and its equipment will not be perceived whatsoever! Photos... Sorrento Ridge ULTRASITE 'aim:101_1=A= Raleighwood WT Site S' f ely, Aft- . i r r Principal CS Acou4tical End i eerinJ MEMORANDUM 833 SW Eleventh,Suite#808 SHEET Portland,Oregon 97205 USA Page: Mailing: PO Box 3413, Portland, OR 97208-3413 Date: 01/30/2004 Phone: 503-227-6233 Time: 11:34:24 AM FAX: 503-227-4863 Day: Friday CEL: 503-329-6399 E-mail: clifford.sroka @att.net To: Dave Fisher Subject: Raleighwood Noise Study for the UNTRASITE WT Project: Raleighwood Client: T-Mobile Leq Overall Levels Notes: 60 50 w 40 U 30 dB 020 10 0 x � � ca � 2 0- E � m Raleighwood Noise Levels DEQ noise regulation, not to exceed ---------- -------- - ---50 dBA. Measured ambient at adjacent nosie sensitive property line at 10 pm. — 53 dB Leq Predicted noise at the adjacent noise sensitive property line 40 feet------ 23 dBA. CS Acoustical Engineerinb MEMORANDUM 833 SW Eleventh,Suite#808 SHEET Portland,Oregon 97205 USA Page: Mailing: PO Box 3413,Portland,OR 97208-3413 Date: 02/02/2004 Phone: 503-227-6233 Time: 09:36:12 AM FAX: 503-227-4863 Day: Monday CEL: 503-329-6399 E-MAIL: clifford.sroka @att.net <For drawing files and business correspondence To: Dave Fisher Measured Levels at 1 foot Subject: WT Eqpt. Comparisons T-Mobile –30 dBA SPL Sprint 60 dBA SPL House—63 dBA SPL Project: Skidmore St. Portland Irvington Other 57 dBA SPL Client: T-Mobile Notes: Cliff Sroka Eqpt. Noise Comparisons 70 co 50 ■ �� m 40 a ■ d6 w 30 U 20 • • • • 10 • • • • _ O 17. bl t Noise Levels @ 1 Foot,SPL. Welkin Engineering, P.C. December 23, 2003 JO: 03-15L04 P 0--4037-C Torn Ginsbach Northwest Geotech, inc. 9120 SW Pioneer Court,Suite B Wilsonville,Oregon 97070 RE: KING CITY T-MOBILE CELL TOWER SIGHT DISTANCE Dear Torn: A site analysis was recently performed at 13680 SW Pacific Highway,to establish existing sight distance from the egress of the properties' proposed cell tower. The reference for the study was a point 15'behind the fog line of SW Pacific Highway at an existing driveway that will be used to service the tower,and 3.5'high to any object in the travel lane. The posted speed limit is 35 mph. According to ODOT,a minimum of 600'of clear sight distance should be available for egress onto SW Pacific Highway. Sighting Euiu the driveway to the west showed clear sight distance of greater than 600 feet to the signalized intersection at SW Gaarde St/SW McDonald St. Sighting to the east from the driveway showed clear sight distance of greater than 600'. Based upon our analysis,the current sight distance from the proposed T-Mobile access driveway is more than adequate in each direction. Existing shrubbery near the driveway may obscure the visual clearance area, as defined in the City of Tigard Development Code, Section 18.795.040,but it doesn't interfere with the sight distance as described, and can be maintained to conform to the visual clearance area requirement. Should you have any questions,please call me at(503) 598-1866. Sincerely, WELKIN EN E• ► ,P.C. . (1 W trAtef Ed Christensen,P.E. 15,166 Principal cc: file �y��f14 ;1 RECEIVED /,.ar,.i43r/s MAR 2 5 2004 CITY OF TIGARD PLANININAMNOINEFP IN? • 1_._ -;-- e ...:._-__ ___ ____ ......__ Gt Fit Al 11-1AN e - Uiuti 141!Gilt �� .....0_,vt4110! � .■ i •,!...'" ../.' ``?>S g %_ f N. 1, 17 e.0,1 i '` / yr P s• ..._ 00 ,- . ,... ... ._ , ... , ..., ..... -... ....... i#4. ', 0. ...- es -■+ s'-,. Xi/ ' 1 ...ro.„ ,. ,,,,, r r pp�� .,,y i` `v\ ` 1 ,I Ct boa' Si6NT ,\ . • -.2%. N,, r i 1/4\,1/4 "\, # -..-.:0-- r de • C 1f ~• ` / \ `/ K i oanoloolirrfrl• a — sir\ \ GRApIiIC SCALE i • •t lit Ra) a \�• 1 1...._ „ $s eto'n'f 1O167' I f I i I L1N2 1-plDir BEze-o i I �_i' l3 z�zr SsQ / �" !nu.M1131 i _ CURVE SEC • �`Q11A ,Anal,„,-, LEW' i of V: in% _, i /�I/�• 1 •4) M,761_ S) '1Sj E. 424 1 • MA12 , - i i - ' OITYOFTGARD MANININSINNOINEPRi NG UTILITY EASEMENT AGREEMENT In exchange for other good and valuable consideration, we hereby convey to PORTLAND GENERAL ELECTRIC COMPANY("PGE"), an Oregon corporation, an easement of such width as may be reasonably necessary over, under, upon and across our lands in Section '2 - , Township Z-- Range ' ,of Willamette Meridian,for the purpose of enabling PGE to erect,construct,maintain and operate electric power lines,together with such poles, conduits,wires,guys,supports,electrical equipment and facilities as may be reasonably connected therewith or appurtenant thereto. We hereby grant to POE the right to enter upon our lands to perform necessary surveys and to cut and/or trim any trees or other growth upon or adjacent to such easement which may interfere with construction, operation or maintenance of such line. We further agree to execute a more detailed easement agreement containing specific property descriptions when such easement agreement may be prepared and presented by PGE IN WITNESS WHEREOF, we have executed this Utility Easement Agreement this 5n4 day of1(.12. , jet _ Grantor's Name (print) Signature Grantor's Name (print) Signature Q . D . Bo( 236 ; t i 4 ► � 4 � S Mailing Address 503 '61-5 '11-62 Home Telephone Work Telephone RECEIVED MAR 2 5 2004 omr OF TIGARD- • POE 1976(Sep 84) PLANNINIMMINEriNG Ftle Number 5613 fit` Sensitive Area Pre-Screening Site Assessment .I L Jurisdiction C41 f I).91- Date 1) 124/03 Map &Tax Lot -2S 3-D ZCC/ 01,00 Owner -t; &eJ Ed,*4/.,C Site Address 134, sw Pac_i Kc. Tips/'/ 10k 41'*12.3 Contact .l tr.% 8 44. 74- c/d T-,41.4 Proposed Activity 'ct 1 Address 1 coo N& V1lvb,3k S Nor Mq-lro Po(fl P 0 cf7?3 t 3 Ep CALds Phone So - 3'17lq Official use only below this line Y N NA Y N NA rigSensitive Area Composite Map Stomtwater Infrastructure maps ❑ ❑ Map# .2.5/((Mt' ❑ ❑ " QS# uy/r ❑ ❑ ® Specify studies or maps ® ❑ ❑ Specify Zoo,Z a.e,.;a/ 4.ro Based on a review of the above information and the requirements of Clean Water Services Design and Construction Standards Resolution and Order No.03-11: ❑ Sensitive areas potentially exist on site or within 200'of the site.THE APPUCANT MUST PERFORM A SITE CERTIFICATION PRIOR TO ISSUANCE OF A SERVICE PROVIDER LETTER OR STORMWATER CONNECTION PERMIT. If Sensitive Areas exist on the site or within 200 feet on adjacent properties,a Natural Resources Assessment Report may also be required. ni Sensitive areas do not appear to exist on site or within 200' of the site.This pre- screening site assessment does NOT eliminate the need to evaluate and protect water quality sensitive areas if they are subsequently discovered on your property. NO FURTHER SITE ASSESSMENT OR SERVICE PROVIDER LETTER IS REQUIRED.THIS FORM WILL SERVE AS AUTHORIZATION TO ISSUE A STORMWATER CONNECTION PERMIT. ❑ The proposed activity does not meet the definition of development. NO SITE ASSESSMENT OR SERVICE PROVIDER LETTER IS REQUIRED. Comments: p forearjedy it-45-7';1"e �r R�! ecvr. To e /Oi? Reviewed By: Date: ‘,/,2„.6/03 RECEIVED Returned to Applicant MAR 2 5 2004 Mailer Fax .Counter Date f/.z.Vo5 By- CITY OF TIGARD ifate,Suite 270•Hillsboro,Oregon 97124 hone: (503)846-8621 •Fax (503)8463525•www.dor aterscrvices.ore 04/20/2004 14:42 FAX 425 398 7420 VOICE STREAM iP002 • AC � s SITE LEASE WITH OPTION V 1-7X.1 THIS SITE LEASE WITH OPTION(this"Lease")is by and between TIGARD LODGE NO 207,A F.&A.M.,an Oregon corporation("Landlord")and VOICESTREAM PCS I,LLC,a Delaware Limited Liability Company("Tenant"). 1. Option to Lease. (a) In consideration of the payment of one hundred and no/100 dollars ($100.00) (the "Option Fee") by Tenant to Landlord,Landlord hereby grants to Tenant an option to lease the use of a portion of the real property described in the attached Exhibit A(the"Property"),on the terms and conditions set forth herein(the"Option")- The Option shall be for an initial term of twelve(12)months, commencing on the Effective Date(as defined below) (the "Option Period"). The Option Period may be extended by Tenant for an additional twelve(12)months upon written notice to Landlord and payment of the sum ("Additional Option Fee")at any time prior to the and of the Option Period (b)During the Option Period and any extension thereof,and during the term of this Lease,Landlord agrees to cooperate with Tenant in obtaining,at Tenant's expense,all licenses and permits or authorizations required for Tenant's use of the Premises (as defined below) from all applicable government and/or regulatory entities(including,without limitation, zoning and land use authorities, and the Federal Communication Commission("FCC")("Governmental Approvals"),including appointing Tenant as agent for all land use and zoning permit applications,and Landlord agrees to cooperate with and to allow Tenant,at no cost to Landlord,to obtain a title report,zoning approvals and variances,land-use permits,and Landlord expressly grants to Tenant a right of access to the Property to perform surveys,soils tests,and other engineering procedures or environmental investigations on the Property necessary to determine that Tenant's use of the Premises will be compatible with Tenant's engineering specifications, system design, operations and Governmental Approvals. Notwithstanding the foregoing, Tenant may not change the zoning classification of the Property without first obtaining Landlord's written consent During the Option Period and any extension thereof,Landlord agrees that it will not interfere with Tenant's efforts to secure other licenses and permits or authorizations that relate to other property. During the Option Period and any extension thereof,Tenant may exercise the Option by so notifying Landlord in writing,at Landlord's address in accordance with Section 12 hereof (c)If Tenant exercises die Option,then,subject to the following terms and conditions,Landlord hereby leases to Tenant the use of that portion of the Property sufficient for placement of the Antenna Facilities (as defined below), together with all necessary space and easements for access and utilities,as generally described and depicted in the attached Exhibit B(collectively referred to hereinafter as the"Premises"). The Premises,located at 13680 SW Pacific Hwy,Tigard,Washington!County,Oregon 97223.comprises approximately 700 square feet. 2. '12t .rm The initial term of this Lease shall be five(5)years commencing on the date of the exercise of the Option(the "Commencement Date"),and terminating at midnight on the last day of the initial term(the"Initial Term"). 3. PecmiUcd Use. The Premises may be used by Tenant for the transmission and reception of radio communication signals and for the construction,installation,operation,maintenance,repair,removal or replacement of related facilities,tower and base,antennas,microwave dishes,equipment shelters and/or cabinets and related activities. 4. be payable within twenty(20) days following the Commencement Date or a remainder of the in Commencement Date falls and thereafter Rent will be payable monthly in advance by the fifth day of each month to Tigard Lodge No 207 at Landlord's address specified in Section 12 be low. If this Lease is terminated at a time other than on the last day of a month,Rent shall be prorated as of the date of termination for any reason(other than a default by Tenant) and all prepaid Rent shall be immediately refunded to Tenant. 5. Renewal. Tenant shall have the right to extend this Lease for five(5)additional,five-year terms(each a"Renewal Term"). Each Renewal Term shall be on the same terms and conditions as set forth herein,except that Rent shall be increased by ten percent(10%)of the Rent paid over the preceding term. This Lease shall automatically renew for each successive Renewal Term unless Tenant notifies Landlord,in writing,of Tenant's intention not to renew this Lease,at least sixty(60)days prior to the expiration of the Initial Tam or any Renewal Term. if Tenant shall remain in possession of the Premises at the expiration of this Lease or any Renewal Term without a written agreement,such tenancy shall be deemed a month-to-month tenancy under the same terms and conditions of this Lease. 6. Interference. Tenant shall not use the Premises in any way which interferes with the use of the Property by Landlord, or lessees or licensees of Landlord with rights in the Properly prior in time to Tenant's(subject to Tenant's rights under this Lease, including,without limitation,non-interference). Similarly,Landlord shall not me,nor shall Landlord permit its lessees,licensees, employees,invitees or agents to use,any portion of the Property in any way which interferes with the operations of Tenant Such Site Number. PO-4037C 1 versa-4310-2-01 Sib Name: King City Markel Portland 04/20/2004 14:43 FAX 425 398 7420 VOICE STREAM 81003 interference shall be deemed a material breach by the interfering party,who shall,upon written notice from the other,be responsible for terminating said interference. In the event any such interference does not cease promptly, the parties acknowledge that continuing interference may cause irreparable injury and,therefore,the injured party shall have the right,in addition to any other rights that it may have at law or in equity,to bring a court action to enjoin such interference or to terminate this Lease immediately upon written notice. 7. Improvements;Utilities;Access. (a)Tenant shall have the right,at its expense,to erect and maintain on the Premises improvements,personal property and facilities necessary to operate its communications system,including,without limitation,radio transmitting and receiving antennas, microwave dishes, tower and base,equipment shelters and/or cabinets and related cables and utility lines and a location based system, including, without limitation, antenna(s), coaxial cable, base units and other associated equipment (collectively, the "Antenna Facilities"),as such location based system may be required by any county,state or federal agency/department. Tenant shall have the right to alter replace,expand, enhance and upgrade the Antenna Facilities at any time during the term of this Lease. Tenant shall cause all construction to occur lien-free and in compliance with all applicable laws and ordinances. Landlord acknowledges that it shall not interfere with any aspects of construction, including, without limitation, attempting to direct construction personnel as to the location of or method of installation of the Antenna Facilities and the Easements(as defined below) ("Construction Interference"). Landlord further acknowledges that it will be responsible for any costs and damages(including, fines and penalties)that are directly attributable to Landlord's Construction Interference.The Antenna Facilities shall remain the exclusive property of Tenant Tenant shall have the right to remove the Antenna Facilities at any time during and upon the expiration or termination of this Lease. (b) Tenant, at its expense, may use any and all appropriate means of restricting access to the Antenna Facilities, including,without limitation,the construction of a fence. (c)Tenant shall,at Tenant's expense,keep and maintain the Antenna Facilities now or hereafter located on the Property in commercially reasonable condition and repair during the term of this L ease,normal wear and tear and casualty excepted. Upon termination or expiration of this Lease,the Premises shall be returned to Landlord in good,usable condition,normal wear and tear and casualty excepted. (d)Tenant shall have the right to install utilities,at Tenant's expense,and to improve the present utilities on the Property (nnchid ng, but not limited to, the installation of emergency power generators). Landlord agrees to use reasonable efforts in assisting Tenant to acquire necessary utility service_ Tenant shall,wherever practicable,install separate meters for utilities used on the Property by Tenant Landlord shall diligently correct any variation,interruption or failure of utility service. (e)As partial consideration for Rent paid under this Lease,Landlord hereby grants Tenant an easement in,under and across the Property for ingress, egress, utilities and access (including access for the purposes described in Section I) to the Premises adequate to install and maintain utilities,which include,but are not limited to,the installation of power and telephone service cable, and to service the Premises and the Antenna Facilities at all times during the Initial Term of this Lease and any Renewal Term(collectively,the"Easements").The Easements provided hereunder shall have the same term as this Lease. (f) Tenant shall have 24-hours-a-day, 7-days-a-week access to the Premises("Access") at all times during the Initial Tom of tl}is),ease and any Renewal Terra. In the event Landlord,d,its employees or agents impede or deny Access to Tenant,its employees or agents,Tenant shall,without waiving any other rights that it may have at law or in equity,deduct from Rent amounts due under this Lease an amount equal to five hundred and no/100 dollars($500.00)per day for each day that Access is impeded or denied 8. Ierminatiog. Except as otherwise provided herein,this Lease may be terminated, without any penalty or further liability as follows: (a)upon thirty(30)days'written notice by Landlord if Tenant fails to cure a default for payment of amounts due under this Lease within that thirty(30)day period; (b)immediately if Tenant notifies Landlord of unacceptable results of any title report,environmental or soil tests prior to Tenant's installation of the Antenna Facilities on the Premises,or if Tenant is unable to obtain,maintain,or otherwise forfeits or cancels any license (including, without limitation, an FCC license), permit or any Governmental Approval necessary to the installation and/or operation of the Antenna Facilities or Tenant's business; (c)upon ninety(90)days'written notice by Tenant if the Property or the Antenna Facilities are,or become unacceptable under Tenant's design or engineering specifications for its Antenna Facilities or the communications system to which the Antenna Facilities belong; Site N amber PO-40370 2 Vriaioo r 0 2-0r i Site Nepic King City Market: Porda,l 04/20/2004 14:43 FAX 425 398 7420 VOICE STREAM a 004 (d)immediately upon written notice by Tenant if the Premises or the Antenna Facilities are destroyed or damaged so as in Tenant's reasonable judgment to substantially and adversely affect the effective use of the Antenna Facilities. In such event,all rights and obligations of the parties shall cease as of the date of the damage or destruction,and Tenant shall be entitled to the reimbursement of any Rent prepaid by Tenant If Tenant elects to continue this Lease,then all Rent shall abate until the Premises and/or the Antenna Facilities are restored to the condition existing immediately prior to such damage or destruction;or (e) at the time title to the Property transfers to a condemning authority,pursuant to a taking of all or a portion of the Property sufficient in Tenant's determination to render the Premises unsuitable for Tenant's use. Landlord and Tenant shall each be entitled to pursue their own separate awards with respect to such taking. Sale of all or part of the Property to a purchaser with the power of eminent domain in the face of the exercise of the power shall be treated as a taking by condemnation. 9. Default and Right to Cure. Notwithstanding anything contained herein to the contrary and without waiving any other rights granted to it at law or in equity,each party shall have the right,but not the obligation,to terminate this Lease on written notice pursuant to Section 12 hereof to take effect immediately,if the other party(i)fails to perform any covenant for a period of thirty(30)days after receipt of written notice thereof to cure or(ii)commits a material breach of this Lease and fails to diligently pursue such cure to its completion after sixty(60)days'written notice to the defaulting party. 10. Taxes. Landlord shall pay when due all real property taxes for the Property,including the Premises. In the event that Landlord fails to pay any such real property taxes or other fees and assessments, Tenant shall have the right, but not the obligation,to pay such owed amounts and deduct them from Rent amounts due under this Lease. Notwithstanding the foregoing, Tenant shall pay any personal property tax,real property tax or any other tax or fee which are directly attributable to the presence or installation of the Tenant's Antenna Facilities,only for so long as this Lease has not expired of its own terms or is not terminated by either party. Landlord hereby grants to Tenant the right to challenge,whether in a Court,Administrative Proceeding,or other venue,on behalf of Landlord and/or Tenant,any personal property or real property tax assessments that may affect Tenant. if Landlord receives notice of any personal property or real property tax assessment against the Landlord,which may affect Tenant and is directly attributable to Tenant's installation,Landlord shall provide timely notice of the assessment to Tenant sufficient to allow Tenant to consent to or challenge such assessment Further,Landlord shall provide to Tenant any and all documentation associated with the assessment and shall execute any and all documents reasonably necessary to effectuate the intent of this Section 10. I I. b_surance and Subrogation and Indemnification. (a) Tenant shall provide Commercial General Liability Insurance in an aggregate amount of One Million and no/100 dollars($1,000,000.00). Tenant may satisfy this requirement by obtaining the appropriate endorsement to any master policy of liability insurance Tenant may maintain. (b)Landlord and Tenant hereby mutually release each other(and their successors or assigns)from liability and waive all right of recovery against the other for any loss or damage covered by their respective first party property insurance policies for all perils insured thereunder. In the event of such insured loss,neither party's insurance company shall have a subrogated claim against the other. To the extent loss or damage is not covered by their first party property insurance policies,Landlord and Tenant each agree to indemnify and hold harmless the other party from and against any and all claims,damages,cost and expenses,including reasonable attorney fees,to the extent caused by or arising out of (a)the negligent acts or omissions or willful misconduct in the operations or activities on the Property by the indemnifying party or the employees,agents,contractors,licensees,tenants and/or subtenants of the indemnifying party,or(b)a breach of any obligation of the indemnifying party under this Lease. Notwithstanding the foregoing, this indemnification shall not extend to indirect,special, incidental or consequential damages, including, without limitation,loss of profits,income or business opportunities to the indemnified party or anyone claiming through the indemnified party. The indemnifying party's obligations tinder this section are contingent upon(i)its receiving prompt written notice of any event giving rise to an obligation to indemnifying the other party and(i)the indemnified party's granting it the right to control the defense and settlement of the same. Notwithstanding anything to the contrary in this Lease,the parties hereby confirm that the provisions of this section shall survive the expiration or termination of this Lease. Tenant shall not be responsible to Landlord,or any third-party, for any claims, costs or damages (including, fines and penalties) attributable to any preexisting violations of applicable codes,statutes or other regulations governing the Property,including the Premises. 12. Notices. All notices,requests,demands and other communications shall be in writing and are effective three(3) days after deposit in the U.S.mail,certified and postage paid,or upon receipt if personally delivered or sent by next-business-day delivery via a nationally recognized overnight courier to the addresses set forth below. Landlord or Tenant may from time to time designate any other address for this purpose by providing written notice to the other party. sire Nember PO-4137E 3 Version t0-2-01 Sin Nan= King City Market Portland 04/20/2004 14:44 FAX 425 398 7420 VOICE STREAM fj005 If to Trnapt to: With a copy to: Voicestream Wireless Corporation VOICESTREAM PCS I,LLC 12920 SE 3811 Street 1500 NE Irving,Suite 530 Bellevue,WA 98006 Portland,OR 97232 Attn: PCS Lease Administrator Attn:Lease Administration Manager With a copy to: Attn: Legal Dept If to Landlord,to: With a copy to; TIGARD LODGE NO 207,A.F.&A.M.,an Oregon corporation PO Box 230184,Tigard,OR 97281 13. Quiet Enjoyment.Title and Authority. Landlord covenants and warrants to Tenant that(i)Landlord has full right, power and authority to execute this Lease; (ii)it has good and unencumbered title to the Property free and clear of any liens or mortgages,except those disclosed to Tenant and which will not interfere with Tenant's rights to or use of the Premises; and(iii) execution and performance of this Lease will not violate any laws,ordinances,covenants,or the provisions of any mortgage,lease, or other agreement binding on Landlord Landlord covenants that at all times during the term of this Lease, Tenant's quiet enjoyment of the Premises or any part thereof shall not be disturbed as long as Tenant is not in default beyond any applicable grace or cure period. 14. EnvironmentaLJ.,aws. Landlord represents that it has no knowledge of any substance, chemical or waste (collectively,"Hazardous Substance")on the Property that is identified as hazardous,toxic or dangerous in any applicable federal, state or local law or regulation Landlord and Tenant shall not introduce or use any Hazardous Substance on the Property in violation of any applicable law. Landlord shall be responsible for,and shall promptly conduct any investigation and re mediation as requi red by any applicable environmental laws,all spills or other releases of any Hazardous Substance not caused solely by Tenant, that have occurred or which may-occur on the Property, Each party agrees to defend,indemnify and hold harmless the other from and against any and all administrative and judicial actions and rulings,claims,causes of action,demands and liability(collectively, "Claims")including,but not limited to,damages,costs,expenses,assessments,penalties,fines,losses,judgments and reasonable attorney fees that the indemnitee may suffer or incur due to the existence or discovery of any Hazardous Substances on the Property or the migration of any Hazardous Substance to other properties or the release of any Hazardous Substance into the environment (collectively, `Actions"), that relate to or arise from the indenmitor's activities on the Property. Landlord agrees to defend, indemnify and hold Tenant harmless from Claims resulting from Actions on the Property not caused by Landlord or Tenant prior to and during the Initial Term and any Renewal Term of this L ease. The indemnifications in this section specifically include,without limitation,costs incurred in connection with any investigation of site conditions or any cleanup,remedial,removal or restoration work required by any governmental authority. This Section 14 shall survive the termination or expiration of this Lease. 15. Assignment and Subles i g. Tenant may assign this Lease and the Easements (as defined above)granted herein upon written notice to Landlord. Upon such assignment,Tenant shall be relieved of all liabilities and obligations hereunder and Landlord shall look solely to the assignee for performance under this Lease and all obligations hereunder. Tenant may sublease the Premises,upon written notice to Landlord. Additionally,Tenant may,upon notice to Landlord,mortgage or grant a security interest in this Lease and the Antenna Facilities,and may assign this Lease and the Antenna Facilities to any mortgagees or holders of security interests,including their successors or assigns(collectively"Mortgagees',provided such Mortgagees agree to be bound by the terms and provisions of this Lease. In such event,Landlord shall execute such consent to leasehold financing as may reasonably be required by Mortgagees. Landlord agrees to notify Tenant and Tenant's Mortgagees simultaneously of any default by Tenant and to give Mortgagees the same right to cure any default as Tenant or to remove any property of Tenant or Mortgagees located on the Premises,except that the cure period for any Mortgagees shall not be less than thirty(30)days after receipt of the default notice,as provided in Section 9 of this Lease. All such notices to Mortgagees shall be sent to Mortgagees at the address specified by Tenant Failure by Landlord to give Mortgagees such notice shall not diminish Landlord's rights against Tenant,but shall preserve all rights of Mortgagees to cure any default and to remove any property of Tenant or Mortgagees located on the Premises as provided in Section 17 of this Lease. 16. Successors and Assigns. This Lease and the Easements granted herein shall rim with the land,and shall be binding upon and inure to the benefit of the parties,their respective successors,persona!representatives and assigns. 17. Waiver of Landlord's Lien Landlord hereby waives any and all lien rights it may have,statutory or otherwise, concerning the Antenna Facilities or any portion thereof,which shall be deemed personal property for the purposes of this Lease, whet her or not the same is deemed real or personal property under applicable laws,and Landlord gives Tenant and Mortgagees the Site Number P0-4037C 4 version 10-2-01 Site Name: ICmg City Market Porthnd 04/20/2004 14:45 FAX 425 398 7420 VOICE STREAM IZ 006 right to remove all or any portion of the same from time to time,whether before or after a default under this Lease,in Tenant's and/or Mortgagee's sole discretion and without Landlord's consent. 18. Miscellaneous. (a)The prevailing party in any litigation arising hereunder shall be entitled to its reasonable attorneys'fees and court costs,including appeals,if any. (b)Each party agrees to furnish to the other,within twenty(20)days after request,such truthful estoppel information as the other may reasonably request. (c)This Lease constitutes the entire agreancot and understanding of the parties,and supersedes all offers,negotiations and other agreements. There are no representations or understandings of any kind not set forth herein. Any amendments to this Lease must be in writing and executed by both parties. (d)Each party agrees to cooperate with the other in executing any documents(mcluding a Memorandum of Lease in substantially the form attached hereto as Exhibit C)necessary to protect its rights or use of the Premises. The Memorandum of Lease may be recorded in place of this Lease by either party. In the event the Property is encumbered by a mortgage or deed of trust,Landlord agrees,upon request of Tenant,to obtain and furnish to Tenant a non-disturbance and attcrnment agreement for each such mortgage or deed of trust,in a form reasonably acceptable to Tenant Tenant may obtain title insurance on its interest in the Premises. Landlord agrees to execute such documents as the title company may require in connection therewith. (e)This Lease shall be construed in accordance with the laws of the state in which the Property is located (1)If any term of this Lease is found to be void or invalid,such finding shall not affect the remaining terms of this Lease, which shall continue in full force and effect. The parties agree that if any provisions are deemed not enforceable,they shall be deemed modified to the extent necessary to make them enforceable. Any questions of particular interpretation shall not be interpreted against the draftsman,but rather in accordance with the fair meaning thereof. No provision of this Lease will be donned waived by either party unless expressly waived in writing signed by the waiving party. No waiver shall be implied by delay or any other act or omission of either party. No waiver by either party of any provision of this Lease shall be deemed a waiver of such provision with respect to any subsequent matter relating to such provision. (g)The persons who have executed this Lease represent and warrant that they are duly authorized to execute this lease in their individual or representative capacity as indicated. (h)This Lease may be executed in any number of counterpart copies,each of which shall be deemed an original,but all of which together shall constitute a single instrument (i)All Exhibits referred to herein and any Addenda are incorporated herein for all purposes. The parties understand and acknowledge that Exhibit A(the legal description of the Property)and)exhibit B(the Premises location within the Property),may be attached to this Lease and the Memorandum of Lease, in preliminary form. Accordingly, the parties agree that upon the preparation of final,more complete exhibits,Exhibits A,and/or B,as the case may be,which may have been attached hereto in preliminary form,may be replaced by Tenant with such final,more complete exhibit(s). The terms of all Exhibits are incorporated herein for all purposes. (j)If Landlord is represented by any broker or any other leasing agent,Landlord is responsible for all commission fee or other payment to such agent,and agrees to indemnify and bold Tenant harmless from all claims by such broker or anyone claiming through such broker. If Tenant is represented by any broker or any other leasing agent,Tenant is responsible for all commission fee or other payment to such agent,and agrees to indemnify and hold Landlord harmless from all claims by such broker or anyone claiming through such broker The effective date of this Lease is the date of execution by the last party to sign(the"Effective Date'). %teN.mber PO-40370 5 Version 10-2-01 Site Name King Clip Muk.ek Porthmi 04/20/2004 14:45 FAX 425 398 7420 VOICE STREAM 007 LANDLORD: TIGARD LODGE NO 207,A.F.&A.M., Oregon corporation By. " ' „S-.34 Printed Name: J. 2714” - 3 -'141 Its: /J7.¢-ST A-'Z Date: /V ✓, i .2 , a o 3 TENANT: VOICESTREAM P S I,LLC Printed Name: Bryon tillt Its: Vice-' Date: 03. .pr' ed as o arm 41p.na Sits Namber.. PO-40370 6 Version 10-2-01 sib Name: K'mgCity Markel: Portland 04/20/2004 14:45 FAX 425 398 7420 VOICE STREAM Ij 008 I [Notary block for Landlord! STATE OF OREGON ) )ss. COUNTY OF WASHINGTON ) /1/ This instrument was acknowledged before me on •//10 2003,by 1) Art-h,ur Eu.5 h , s4X of Tigard Lodge No.207,A.F.&A. M.,an Oregon corporation,on behalf of said Tigard Lodge No.207,A.F.&A.M. Dated: /01:2-1)?) ) ) 1 -.V'1-..OFFICUILSEAL ti-�` _.//,I.'L.� / 14.4/ / :_,; Notary Public , TAMERA R.VANDERIANDEN � �ra— ' NOTARY si0N10OREGON I iQ e j /C ,/. ild .YZik igd_OJr l j ^ „� COMMISSfON N0.359321 � Print Namc () •_'�r CO/MSSIDN MME'S JULY%2006 T . / /�� C;`....^�„s�ti•-_-__`-`1ti•„-1-�,-�- i My commission expires _ /C. t t (Use this space for notary stamp/seal) /Notary block for Tenant] STATE OF ) • )ss. COUNTY OF ---...:�exa..s om l, � I certify taT w r have satisfactory evidence that Bryon Gunnerson is the person who appeared before me, and said person acknowledged that he signed this instrument,on oath stated that he was authorized to execute the instrument and acknowledged it as the Vico-President of VOICESTREAM PCS I,LLC,a Delaware Limited Liability Company,to be the free and voluntary act of such party for the uses and purposes mentioned in the instrument Dated: 1 , 1_C.:� _;y,`~GO,"+'T++ N. to� ++ N blic .**c0 O1 q, +++' Print Name ....\1-1-----LA, r .14- o NOTARI' �;: S • ;U �•� Go My commission expires 1°N,1 �t� ' .$tit'. PUBLIC s = 2 r r AO.1,o� ` (Use h stamPi scal) Approved as to form Site Numbcr. P44037C 7 Version 10-2-01 Site Name: Meg City Marta: Portland 04/20/2004 14:48 FAX 425 398 7420 VOICE STREAM [j 009 ADDENDUM TO SITE LEASE WITH OPTION [Additional Terms] In the event of conflict or inconsistency between the terms of this Addendum and this Lease,the terms of the Addendum shall govern and control. All capitalized terms shall have the same meaning as in this Lease. 1. Add Section I8(k)as follows: Prior to start of initial construction,Landlord shall have the right to review and approve construction drawings provided by Tenant. Landlord shall not unreasonably withhold condition or delay such approval. LANDLORD: TIGARD LODGE NO 207,A.F.&A_M.,an Oregon corporation By: K-! / / 4' Printed Name: a/a_ •YJS N Its: 7'j'JffT/� Date: 7Y V. / 2- , Z0 03 TENANT: VOICESTREAM PCS ' LLC By: Printed Name: Bryon o. ..,1 Its: Vices' Date: k Site Nmubcr. P04037C 8 Version 10-2-01 Site Nude- Kg City Market Portland 04/20/2004 14:46 FAX 425 398 7420 VOICE STREAM fj010 /Notary Mock for Landlord] STATE OF OREGON ) ss. COUNTY OF WASHINGTON ) This instrument was acknowledged before me on s • AAA ,2003,by �, {+ ¶BC S l \ , M/LS` e) of Tigard Lodge No.207,A.F.&A. M.,an Oregon corporation,on behalf of said Tigard Lodge No.207,A.F.&A.M. Dated: /1/4210, • ,' `�OFFlCIAL SFAL ~�� Notary Public ) TAMERA R.VANDERZANDEN Print Name Q �j �E:a— NOTARY PU9UC-OREGON I 1( COMMISSION NO.359321 " MY COMUII SSKON DARES JULY 9,2006 ( MY commission expires U 1 (Use this space for notary stamp/seal) /Notary block for Tenant) STATE OF \IN) ) )ss. COUNTY OF I certify that I know or have satisfactory evidence that Bryon Gimncrson is the person who appeared before me,and said person acknowledged that he signed this instrument,on oath stated that he was authorized to execute the instrument and acknowledged it as the Vice-President of VOICESTREAM PCS I,LLC,a Delaware Limited Liability Company,to be the free and voluntary act of such party for the uses and purposes mentioned in the instrument. Dated: \ \ 1 l Qc :i N,GOL,0 iI , 101► -9 pit. N lie s FL dr NOTAA Print Name �..� cmn , My commission expires °A \c ■ t d ; PUBLIC Oz (Use this space notary stamp/seal) Site Number PO-4637C 9 Verson 10-2-01 Site Nome: Kim City Market Portland 04/20/2004 14:46 FAX 425 398 7420 VOICE STREAM a611 11 EXHIBIT A Legal Description The Property is legally described as follows: Beginning at a point on section line between Sections 2 and 3,Township 2 South, Range 1 West, Willamette Meridian, Washington County, Oregon, 9.09 chains North of the Southwest corner of said section 2;thence North along said section line 3.58 chains to center of Tylor Bridge Road; thence North 38°2V East 1.01 chains to center of said road to an iron pin at the most Westerly corner of the tract described in deed to R. M. Brandhagen,et ux, recorded in Book 166, page 307, Deed Records, Washington County, Oregon; thence South 52°31' East 7.04 chains along the Southwesterly line of said Brandhagen tract to a stake on South line of tract being a point on the North line of Freleon Heights No. 2, a plat of record; thence South 88°55'West along said Northerly line and a Westerly extension thereof, 6.24 chains to section line at place of beginning; EXCEPTING THEREFROM that certain tract as more particularly described in Deed Book 128, page 37(a), Record of Deeds,Washington County, Oregon; ALSO EXCEPT that part conveyed to the State of Oregon by deed recorded in Book 334, page 366, Deed Records, Washington County, Oregon. Sae Number PO-4037C 10 version 10-2-01 Site Name: Ian City Merkel. Porltand 04/20/2004 14:47 FAX 425 398 7420 VOICE STREAM U1012 • . EXHIBIT S The location of the Premises within the Property(together with access and ud'laties) • is more particularly described and depicted as follows: 1 �: , 1 . 1 / i / i" / 1 , i v . ;• . a, 11 % r a : t- . / .. _A $ 2 }� 1.x% ,,,, ■ _ 4.\,:;,..112 / Nk1011b■ r 0 4Y A 9 N.ss 01 -fp `, n i' / 4y ,r te _�" 1 tik 11* I . )----— I ••,..,, / . N, / • r • r • SiooNumber. PO-4037C 11 Vation 10.7-01 I Ste om Kg City Marisa: Port and 04/20/2004 14:47 FAX 425 398 7420 VOICE STREAM f0013 EXHIBIT C Memorandum of Lease Silo Number PO-4037C 12 Versant 104.01 SI*Namuc Xbig Oily Matt Portland 04/20/2004 14:47 FAX 425 398 7420 VOICE STREAM Z014 • Memorandum of Lease Assessor's Parcel Number. 2S 102CC 01100 Between TIGARD LODGE NO 207,A.F.&A.M.,an Oregon corporation("Landlord") and VOICESTREAM PCS I,LLC("Tenant') A Site Lease with Option(the"Lease")by and between TIGARD LODGE NO 207,A.F.&A.M.,an Oregon corporation ("Landlord")and VOICESTREAM PCS I,LW,a Delaware Limited Liability Company ("Tenant")was made regarding a portion of the following property: See Attached Exhibit"A"incorporated herein for all purposes The Option is for a term of twelve(12)months after the Effective Date of the Lease(as defined under the Lease),with up to one additional twelve(12)month renewal("Optional Period"). The Lease is for a term of five(5)years and will commence on the date as set forth in the Lease(the"Commencement Date'. Tenant shall have the right to extend this Lease for five(5)additional five-year tenon. IN WITNESS WHEREOF,the parties hereto have respectively executed this memorandum effective as of the date of the last party to sign. LAN DLORD: TIGARD LODGE NO 207,A.F.&A.M.,an Oregon corporation By. Printed Name: iz &L ASH Its: 4'41,1 7/a'C- Date- /a✓. / Z 3 TEN ANT: VOICFSTREAM S i LLC BY PrintedName: B Its: V'•; .ident Date: ∎ a \ `1 03 Si bNumber.. PO-4037C 13 Version 10-2-01 Site Nama King City • Marko Portlin d 04/20/2004 14:47 FAX 425 398 7420 VOICE STREAM Ii11015 [Notary block for Landlord] STATE OF OREGON )ss. COUNTY OF WASHINGTON ) ^/ This instrument was acknowledged before me on / O V. l �c ,2003,by .(J. Ar4 L�'� B(1S '1 , M(154 of Tigard Lodge No.207,K F.&A. M.,an Oregon corporation,on behalf of said Tigard Lodge No.207,A F.&A.M. Dated: !l P /U3 r`�-�ti-� Notary Public () OFFICIAL SEAL / !' TAMERA R.VANDERZANDEN Print Name /&IIIC-Ya. / rZa-r/cteY1 ii� NOTARY FUBLIC-OREGON ) { `ii+� COMMISSION NO.359321 l� ( O! 1 MY COMMON D JULY 9,2006 () My commission expires - J IA_6 9, K/ (Use this space for notary stamp/seal) (Notary block for Tenant] STATE OF \)i\ ) t,. )as. COUNTY OF Y:1 ) I certify that I know or have satisfactory evidence that Bryon Giunerson is the person who appeared before me,and said person acknowledged that he signed this instrument,on oath stated that he was authorized to execute the instrument and acknowledged it as the Vice-President of VOICESTREAM PCS I,LLC,a Delaware Limited Liability Company,to be the free and voluntary act of such party for the uses and purposes mentioned in the instrument. Dated: 416, te r -I�M'. rr N. L\O y6p- ,,,r�ir Print N 1l.5,---T >:� O AH • ; o OZ My commission expires °�` " Orr 91F 0F•wp,S`r� (Use this space : hio&ary stamp/seal) Approved as to form Site Number. PO-40570 14 Version 10-2-01 Sin Name: King City Market Portland 04/20/2004 14:48 FAX 425 398 7420 VOICE STREAM tj016 Memorandum of Lease EXHIBIT A Legal Description The Property is legally deseribed as follows: Beginning at a point on section line between Sections 2 and 3,Township 2 South, Range 1 West, Willamette Meridian, Washington County,Oregon, 9.09 chains North of the Southwest corner of said section 2; thence North along said section line 3.58 chains to center of Tylor Bridge Road; thence North 38°21' East 1.01 chains to center of said road to an iron pin at the most Westerly corner of the tract described in deed to R. M. Brandhagen, et ux, recorded in Book 166, page 307, Deed Records, Washington County, Oregon; thence South 52°31' East 7.04 chains along the Southwesterly line of said Brandhagen tract to a stake on South line of tract being a point on the North line of Freleon Heights No. 2, a plat of record; thence South 88°55' West along said Northerly line and a Westerly extension thereof, 6.24 chains to section line at place of beginning; EXCEPTING THEREFROM that certain tract as more particularly described in Deed Book 128, page 37(a), Record of Deeds,Washington County, Oregon; ALSO EXCEPT that part conveyed to the State of Oregon by deed recorded in Book 334, page 366, Deed Records, Washington County, Oregon. Silt Number. PO 40370 15 version 10-201 Site Name: King City Market Pertlana