The URL can be used to link to this page

SDR2004-00010 SDR2004 - 0001O DEZFULLI AUTO SALES • NOTICE OF TYPE II DECISION SITE DEVELOPMENT REVIEW (SDR) 2004-00010 CITY OF TIGARD DEZFULLI AUTO SALES Community Development Shaping A Better Community 120 DAYS = 5/31/2005 SECTION I. APPLICATION SUMMARY FILE NAME: DEZFULLI AUTO SALES CASE NO.: Site Development Review (SDR) SDR2004-00010 PROPOSAL: The applicant proposes to construct a used automobile sales lot with an associated 350 square foot sales office. OWNER: Ebrahim & Shahin Dezfulli APPLICANT: Same 12587 SW 133rd Avenue Tigard, OR 97223 LOCATION: 15280 SW Pacific Highway; WCTM 2S110DB, Tax Lot 1200. ZONE: C-G: General Commercial District. The C-G zoning district is designed to accommodate a full range of retail, office and civic uses with a Citywide and even regional trade area. Non-conforming, residential uses are limited to single-family residences which are located on the same site as a permitted use. A wide range of uses, including but not limited to adult entertainment, automotive equipment repair and storage, mini-warehouses, utilities, heliports, medical centers, major event entertainment, and gasoline stations, are permitted conditionally. APPLICABLE REVIEW CRITERIA: Community Development Code Chapters 18.360, 18.390, 18.520, 18.705, 18.725, 18.745, 18.755, 18.765, 18.780, 18.790, 18.795 and • 18.810. SECTION II. DECISION Notice is hereby given that the City of Tigard Community Development Director's designee has APPROVED the above request subject to certain conditions of approval. The findings and conclusions on which the decision is based are noted in Section VI. NOTICE OF TYPE II DECISION SDR2004-00010/DEZFULLI AUTO SALES PAGE 1 OF 28 • CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL THE FOLLOWING CONDITIONS SHALL BE SATISFIED PRIOR TO THE ISSUANCE OF SITE/BUILDING PERMITS: Submit evidence of complying with the following conditions to the Planning Division. Staff contact: Mathew Scheidegger. 1. Provide a sign-off letter from the franchise hauler regarding the refuse facility compatibility. 2. Submit a plan showing 24-foot-wide access isles in order to accommodate two- direction traffic. All drive isles must be maintained free of parked cars. 3. Submit a plan showing the bicycle parking structure to include no less than 2-bicycle parking stalls. 4. Provide a plan that shows the bicycle rack designed according to Section 18.765.050.C. of the Tigard Development Code. 5. Provide a new tree removal/protection/mitigation plan that correlates with the project arborists report. The required plan must be accompanied with a letter from the project arborist that acknowledges his or her review and approval. Any variation from the resubmitted plan will require an additional Type II review. 6. The applicant shall submit a final Tree Protection Plan that shows exactly how far the tree protection fencing will be from the face of each protected tree (including those on neighboring properties where construction occurs within the trees' driplines) that will be impacted by construction activities within its dripline. The applicant, through their Project Arborist, shall justify the close proximity of the construction activities to the trees. He shall certify that the activities will not adversely impact the overall and long- term health and stability of each tree. Any construction that occurs within the neighboring trees' driplines should be justified b the applicant and approved by the City Forester and neighboring property owner(s). Work may proceed within the driplines only with the approval of the City Forester. 7. Submit a plan showing parking lot lighting and an elevation of the proposed sales office that shows windows and point of access. THE FOLLOWING CONDITIONS SHALL BE SATISFIED PRIOR TO ISSUANCE OF THE SITE PERMIT: Submit to the Engineering Department (Kim McMillan, 639-4171, ext. 2642) for review and approval: 8. Prior to issuance of a site permit, a Public Facility Improvement (PFI) permit is required for this project to cover half-street and any other work in the public right-of-way. Six (6) sets of detailed public improvement plans shall be submitted for review to the Engineering Department. NOTE: these plans are in addition to any drawings required by the Building Division and should only include sheets rF./ant to public improvements. Public Facility Improvement (PFI) permit plans shall conform to City of Tigard Public Improvement Design Standards, which are available at City Hall and the City's web page (www.ci.tigard.or.us). 9. The PFI permit.plan submittal shall include the exact legal name, address and telephone number of the individual or corporate entity whl be designated as the "Permittee", and who will provide the financial assurance for the public improvements. For example, specify if the entity is a corporation, limited partnership, LLC, etc. Also specify the state within which the entity is incorporated and provide the name of the corporate contact person. Failure to provide accurate information to the Engineering Department will delay processing of project documents. NOTICE OF TYPE II DECISION SDR2004-00010/DEZFULLI AUTO SALES PAGE 2 OF 28 10. The applicant shall provide a construction vehicle access and parking plan for approval by the City Engineer. The urpose of this plan is for parking and traffic control during the public improvement construction phase. All construction vehicle parking shall be provided on-site. No construction vehicles or equipment will be permitted to park on the adjoining residential or commercial public streets. Construction vehicles include the vehicles of any contractor or subcontractor involved in the construction of site improvements or buildings proposed by this application, and shall include the vehicles of all suppliers and employees associated with the project. 11. The applicant shall submit construction plans to the Engineering Department as a part of the Public Facility Improvement permit, which indicate that they will construct a half-street improvement along the frontage of Naeve Street. The improvements adjacent to this site shall include: A. City standard pavement section for a local street from curb to centerline equal to 16 feet; B. pavement tapers needed to tie the new improvement back into the existing edge of pavement shall be built beyond the site frontage; C. concrete curb, or curb and gutter as needed; D. storm drainage, including any off-site storm drainage necessary to convey surface and/or subsurface runoff; E. 5 foot concrete sidewalk with a 5-foot planter strip; F. street trees in the planter strip spaced per TDC requirements; G. street striping; H. streetlight layout by applicant's engineer, to be approved by City Engineer; I. underground utilities; J. street signs (if applicable); K. driveway apron (if applicable); and L. adjustments in vertical and/or horizontal alignment to construct SW Naeve Street in a safe manner, as approved by the Engineering Department. 12. The applicant shall submit construction plans to the Engineering Department as a part of the Public Facility Improvement ermit, indicating that they will construct the following frontage improvements along SW Royalty Parkway as a part of this project: A. 5-foot concrete sidewalk with 5-foot planter strip; B. street trees in the planter strip spaced per TDC requirements; C. streetlight layout by applicant's engineer, to be approved by City Engineer; and D. driveway apron (if applicable). 13. The applicant shall submit construction plans to ODOT and the City Engineering Department as a part of the Public Facility Improvement permit, indicating that they will construct the following frontage improvements along SW Pacific Highway as a part of this project: A. 10-foot concrete sidewalk with 5-foot planter strip; B. street trees in the planter strip spaced per ODOT requirements; C. sidewalk taper and ADA ramp at south end of frontage improvements; and D. ADA ramp at the corner of Pacific Highway and Naeve Street. 13. Prior to issuance of the site permit, the applicant shall obtain a permit from the State of Oregon Highway Division, to perform work within the right-of-way of Pacific Highway. A copy of the permit shall be provided to the City Engineering Department. 14. No direct access will be allowed to Pacific Highway. 15. Prior to issuance of the site permit the applicant shall provide the City with ODOT approval of the stormwater detention and water quality system that will discharge to Pacific Highway. NOTICE OF TYPE II DECISION SDR2004-00010/DEZFULLI AUTO SALES PAGE 3 OF 28 16. Any extension of public water lines shall be shown on the proposed Public Facility Improvement (PFI) permit construction drawings and shall be reviewed and approved by the City's Water Department, as a part of the Engineering Department plan review. NOTE: An estimated 12% of the water system costs must be on deposit with the Water Department prior to approval of the PFI permit plans from the Engineering Department and construction of public water lines. 17. Final design plans and calculations for the proposed private water quality facility discharging to Royalty Parkway shall be submitted to the Engineering Department (Kim McMillan) as a part of the Public Facility Improvement (PFI) permit plans. Included with the plans shall be a proposed landscape plan and maintenance plan. 18. An erosion control plan shall be provided as part of the Public Facility Improvement (PFI) permit drawings. The plan shall conform to the "Erosion Prevention and Sediment Control Design and Planning Manual, February 2003 edition." THE FOLLOWING CONDITIONS SHALL BE SATISFIED PRIOR TO ISSUANCE OF THE BUILDING PERMIT: Submit evidence of complying with the following conditions to the Planning Division. Staff contact: Mathew Scheidegger. 19. The Project Arborist shall submit written reports to the City Forester, at least, once every two weeks, as he monitors the construction activities and progress. These reports should include any changes that occurred to the TPZ as well as the condition and location of the tree protection fencing. If the amount of TPZ was reduced then the Project Arborist shall justify why the fencing was moved, and shall certify that the construction activities to the trees did not adversely impact the overall and long-term health and stability of the tree(s). If the reports are not submitted or received by the City Forester at the scheduled intervals, and if it appears the TPZ's or the Tree Protection Plan is not being followed by the contractor, the City can stop work on the project until an inspection can be done by the City Forester and the Project Arborist. This inspection will be to evaluate the tree protection fencing, determine if the fencing was moved at any point during construction, and determine if any part of the Tree Protection Plan has been violated. 20. Prior to issuance of building permits the Project Arborist shall submit to the City Forester a final report describing how the Tree Protection Plan was implemented and detailing any failures to comply with the Tree Protection Plan. The report shall also describe the health of all remaining trees on the site, with details provided as to any tree that has had its root system disturbed or that has otherwise been damaged. Submit to the Engineering Department (Kim McMillan, 639-4171, ext. 2642) for review and approval: 21. Prior to issuance of building permits, the applicant shall pay the addressing fee. (STAFF CONTACT: Shirley Treat, Engineering). 22. Additional right-of-way shall be dedicated to the Public along the frontage of Naeve Street to increase the right-of-way to 27 feet from the centerline. The description shall be tied to the existing right-of-way centerline. The dedication document shall be on City forms. Instructions are available from the Engineering Department. THE FOLLOWING CONDITIONS SHALL BE SATISFIED PRIOR TO A FINAL BUILDING INSPECTION: Submit to the Engineering Department (Kim McMillan, 639-4171, ext. 2642) for review and approval: 23. Prior to a final building inspection, the applicant shall complete the required public improvements, obtain conditional acceptance from the City, and provide a one-year maintenance assurance for said improvements. NOTICE OF TYPE II DECISION SDR2004-00010/DEZFULLI AUTO SALES PAGE 4 OF 28 • 24. Prior to final building inspection, the applicant shall provide the City with as-built drawings of the public improvements as follows: 1) 3 mil mylar, 2) a diskette of the as-builts in "DWG" format, if available; otherwise "DXF" will be acceptable, and 3) the as-built drawings shall be tied to the City's GPS network. The applicant's engineer shall provide the City with an electronic file with points for each structure (manholes, catch basins, water valves, hydrants and other water system features) in the development, and their respective X and Y State Plane Coordinates, referenced to NAD 83 (91). 25. The applicant shall either place the existing overhead utility lines along SW Naeve Street underground as a part of this project, or they shall pay the fee in-lieu of undergrounding. The fee shall be calculated by the frontage of the site that is parallel to the utility lines and will be $35.00 per lineal foot. If the fee option is chosen, the amount will be$15, 050.00 and it shall be paid prior to final building inspection. If the applicant will be provided power off of their Royalty Parkway or Pacific Highway Frontage this fee will not apply. 26. To ensure compliance with Clean Water Services design and construction standards, the applicant shall employ the design engineer responsible for the design and specifications of the private water quality facility to perform construction and visual observation of the water quality facility for compliance with the design and specifications. These inspections shall be made at significant stages, and at completion of the construction. Prior to final building inspection, the design engineer shall provide the City of Tigard (Inspection Supervisor) with written confirmation that the water quality facility is in compliance with the design and specifications. Staff Contact: Hap Watkins, Building Division. THIS APPROVAL SHALL BE VALID FOR EIGHTEEN (18) MONTHS FROM THE EFFECTIVE DATE OF THIS DECISION. SECTION III. BACKGROUND INFORMATION Site History: Staff conducted a search of city records for the Tax Lot (2S110DB, Tax Lot 1200). Based on this search, two (2) previous cases were found to be associated with the property. CPA91- 00002 was an approval to change the designation of SW Naeve Street from a minor collector to a local street. The second case, SDR2001-00011, was the original approval for the used car lot with the associated sales office, which expired prior to the applicant meeting his conditions of approval. Vicinity Information: The subject site is located on the east side of SW Pacific Highway. The site is bordered on the south by property zoned General Commercial (C-G) and is separated from the property to the north by SW Naeve Street. The property to the north is zoned R-25 and developed with a church. Site Information and Proposal Description: The applicant proposes to construct a used automobile sales lot with an associated 350 square foot sales office. SECTION IV. COMMENTS FROM PROPERTY OWNERS WITHIN 500 FEET Two letters from a neighbor were submitted which address the following concerns in bold: Due to the amount of traffic in the area, the addition of a used car lot is an open invitation to accidents. NOTICE OF TYPE II DECISION SDR2004-00010/DEZFULLI AUTO SALES PAGE 5 OF 28 • Staff Response: Used car lots are allowed outright in the C-G zoning district. Because of the close proximity to Highway 99, ODOT was notified and they did not require a traffic study. It is expected that Dezfulli Auto will have a maximum of 5 employees on site at any given time. Therefore, the number of Vehicle Trips per day would range between 106 and 193 if this was a new car lot. Used car lots should actually generate less traffic. This is far below the requirements for a Traffic Impact Study. The Existing ADT is 127 for the City Street, Naeve Street, based on a 1997 study. With this low ADT the development would have to generate 2000 Vehicle Trips per day before a study would be required. The proposed access drives are outside of the influence areas of the adjacent intersections and there is no direct access to Highway 99. A used car lot will detract from the "esthetic value" of the general area. I suggest the best usage for the property would be a mini park or, possibly two private homes. More than that would be overcrowding that rather small space. Used car lots are an allowed use within the C-G zoning district. The City of Tigard cannot dictate the use of property if the applicant meets the existing law. The City does not own the property and single-family homes are not permitted in the C-G zoning district. SECTION V. SUMMARY OF APPLICABLE REVIEW CRITERIA A. Zoning Districts 18.520 (Commercial Zoning Districts) B. Applicable Development Code Standards 18.705 Access Egress and Circulation) 18.725 Environmental Performance Standards) 18.745 Landscaping and Screening) 18.755 Mixed Solid Waste and Recyclable Storage) 18.765 Off-Street parking and loading requirements) 18.780 Signs 18.790 Tree Removal) 18.795 Visual Clearance) C. Specific DR Approval Criteria 18.360 D. Street and Utility Improvement Standards 18.810 E. Impact Study 18.390 SECTION VI. APPLICABLE DEVELOPMENT CODE STANDARDS A. ZONIING DISTRICT Commercial Zoning District: Section 18.520.020 Lists the description of the Commercial Zoning Districts. The site is located in the C-G: General Commercial District. Development Standards: Section 18.520.040.B States that Development standards in commercial zoning districts are contained in Table 18.520.2 below: (SEE TABLE ON THE FOLLOWING PAGE) NOTICE OF TYPE II DECISION SDR2004-00010/DEZFULLI AUTO SALES PAGE 6 OF 28 TABLE 18.520.2 DEVELOPMENT STANDARDS IN COMMERCIAL ZONES STANDARD C-G Proposed Minimum Lot Size None 33,285 sq.ft. -Detached unit - -Boarding, lodging, rooming house - Minimum Lot Width 50 ft 420 ft. Minimum Setbacks -Front yard 0 ft[6] 72 ft. -Side facing street on corner&through lots[1] - - -Side yard 130 ft. -Side or rear yard abutting more restrictive zoning district 0/20 ft[3] - -Rear yard - 5 ft. -Distance between front of garage&property line abutting a public or private street. - 0/20 ft[3] Maximum Height 45 ft Not shown Maximum Site Coverage[2] 85% 85% Minimum Landscape Requirement 15% 15% As demonstrated in the table above, the applicant's plans comply with t e dimensional standards of the C-G zone. The proposed sales office will require building permits which height will be reviewed for compliance at that time. FINDING: Based on the analysis above, the Development Standards criteria have been satisfied. B. APPLICABLE DEVELOPMENT CODE STANDARDS The Site development Review approval standards require that a development proposal be found to be consistent with the various standards of the Community Development Code. The applicable criteria in this case are Chapters 18.360, 18.390, 18.520, 18.705, 18.745, 18.755, 18.765, 18.775, 18.780, 18.790, 18.795, and 18.810. The proposal's consistency with these Code Chapters is reviewed in the following sections. Access, Egress and Circulation (18.705): Access plan: No building or other permit shall be issued until scaled plans are presented and approved as provided by this chapter that show how access, egress and circulation requirements are to be fulfilled. The applicant shall submit a site plan. The Director shall provide the applicant with detailed information about this submission requirement. The applicant has provided plans showing access, egress and circulation from SW Naeve Street and SW Royalty Parkway. Therefore, this standard has been satisfied. Joint access: Owners of two or more uses, structures, or parcels of land may agree to utilize jointly the same access and egress when the combined access and egress of both uses, structures, or parcels of land satisfies the combined requirements as designated in this title, provided: Satisfactory legal evidence shall be presented in the form of deeds, easements, leases or contracts to establish the joint use; and copies of the deeds, easements, leases or contracts are placed on permanent file with the City. No joint access is proposed at this time. Therefore, this standard does not apply. Public street access: All vehicular access and egress as required in Sections 18.705.030H and 18.705.0301 shall connect directly with a public or private street approved by the City for public use and shall be maintained at the required standards on a continuous basis. NOTICE OF TYPE II DECISION SDR2004-00010/DEZFULLI AUTO SALES PAGE 7 OF 28 The proposed building is accessible from SW Naeve and SW Royalty Parkway, both of which are public streets that will be maintained as a public street. Curb cuts: Curb cuts shall be in accordance with Section 18.810.030N: Concrete curbs, curb cuts, wheelchair, bicycle ramps and driveway approaches shall be constructed in accordance with standards specified in this chapter and Section 15.04.080: Concrete curbs and driveway approaches are required; except where no sidewalk is planned, an asphalt approach may be constructed with City Engineer approval and Asphalt and concrete driveway approaches to the property line shall be built to City configuration standards. No driveway approach shall be less than five feet from the side property line projected except in cul-de-sacs, without approval and written permission of the city. The end slopes may encroach within the five foot restricted area. No portion of any driveway approach, including the end slopes, shall be located closer than thirty feet to an intersection street right-of-way line. Commercial or service drives shall not be more than thirty feet in width and if located on the same lot frontage shall be separated by a minimum length of curb of thirty feet. Each residential driveway shall be not more than twenty-six feet in width including end slopes, and if more than one driveway is to be constructed to serve the same lot, the frontage spacing between such driveways shall be not less than thirty feet measured along the curb line. Joint access driveways shall conform to the appropriate width standard for commercial or residential type usage. Curb cuts will be addressed under Chapter 18.810 Street and Utility Improvement Standards. Therefore, this standard has been satisfied. Walkways: On-site pedestrian walkways shall comply with the following standards: Walkways shall extend from the ground floor entrances or from the ground floor landing of stairs, ramps, or elevators of all commercial, institutional, and industrial uses, to the streets which provide the required access and egress. Walkways shall provide convenient connections between buildings in multi-building commercial, institutional, and industrial complexes. Unless impractical, walkways shall be constructed between new and existing developments and neighboring developments; According to the plans submitted, a concrete walkway extends from the main entrance of the proposed sales office to the northern property line and will connect to the proposed sidewalk of SW Naeve Street. Wherever required walkways cross vehicle access driveways or parking lots, such crossings shall be designed and located for pedestrian safety . Required walkways shall be physically separated from motor vehicle traffic and parking by either a minimum 6-inch vertical separation (curbed) or a minimum 3-foot horizontal separation, except that pedestrian crossings of traffic aisles are permitted for distances no greater than 36 feet if appropriate landscaping, pavement markings, or contrasting pavement materials are used. Walkways shall be a minimum of four feet in width, exclusive of vehicle overhangs and obstructions such as mailboxes, benches, bicycle racks, and sign posts, and shall be in compliance with ADA standards; The proposed walkway crosses a traffic aisle for a distance of 27 feet. Therefore, this standard has been met. Required walkways shall be paved with hard surfaced materials such as concrete, asphalt, stone, brick, etc. Walkways may be required to be lighted and/or signed as needed for safety purposes. Soft-surfaced public use pathways may be provided only if such pathways are provided in addition to required pathways. The plan depicts that the proposed walkway that connects the sales office to the public right-of-way will be concrete, which meets the standard. NOTICE OF TYPE II DECISION SDR2004-00010/DEZFULLI AUTO SALES PAGE 8 OF 28 Access Management (Section 18.705.030.H) Section 18.705.030.H.1 states that an access report shall be submitted with all new development proposals which verifies design of driveways and streets are safe by meeting adequate stacking needs, sight distance and deceleration standards as set by ODOT, Washington County, the City and AASHTO. The applicant's engineer has submitted preliminary sight distance certification for the proposed driveways on Naeve Street and Royalty Parkway. There is more than the required 250 feet of sight d stance in all directions except eastbound on Naeve Street, but because of reduced turning speed the sight distance of 170 feet is adequate. The reduced speed required to turn onto Naeve safely means that a car cannot be traveling at 25 mph and therefore a reduced sight distance is acceptable. Customers exiting the subject site can see to the intersection from the driveway, which is the greatest extent needed to see the east bound vehicle and additionally the cars are not traveling at the allowable posted speed. Section 18.705.030.H.2 states that driveways shall not be permitted to be placed in the influence area of collector or arterial street intersections. Influence area of intersections is that area where queues of traffic commonly form on approach to an intersection. The minimum driveway setback from a collector or arterial street intersection shall be150 feet, measured from the right-of-way line of the intersecting street to the throat of the proposed driveway. The setback may be greater depending upon the influence area, as determined from City Engineer review of a traffic impact report submitted by the applicant's traffic engineer. In a case where a project has less than 150 feet of street frontage, the applicant must explore any option for shared access with the adjacent parcel. If shared access is not possible or practical, the driveway shall be adjacent as far from the intersection as possible. The driveway on Naeve Street has been placed 150 feet from the ROW of Highway 99, an Arterial, thereby meeting this criterion. Section 18.705.030.H.3 and 4 states that the minimum spacing of driveways and streets along a collector shall be 200 feet. The minimum spacing of driveways and streets along an arterial shall be 600 feet. The minimum spacing of local streets along a local street shall be 125 feet. There are no driveways proposed along the Highway 99 frontage. Highway 99 is classified as an Arterial, while Naeve Street and Royalty Parkway are classified as Neighborhood Routes. There is no minimum driveway spacing standard along local streets, which include neighborhood streets. Therefore, this criterion is met. Minimum Access Requirements for Commercial and Industrial Use: Section 18.705.030.1_provides the minimum access requirements for commercial and industrial uses: Table 18.705.3 indicates that the required access width for developments with 0-99 parking spaces is one 30-foot accesses with 24 feet of pavement. Vehicular access shall be provided to commercial or industrial uses, and shall be located to within 50 feet of the primary ground floor entrances; additional requirements for truck traffic may be placed as conditions of site development review. The development has two (2) points of access into the parking lot. The first is a 30-foot wide access with 30 feet of pavement from SW Royalty Parkway. The second access, from SW Naeve Street is 24 feet in width with 24 feet of pavement. Therefore, this standard has been satisfied. One-way vehicular access points: Where a proposed parking facility indicates only one-way traffic flow on the site, it shall be accommodated by a specific driveway serving the facility; the entrance drive shall be situated closest to oncoming traffic and the exit drive shall be situated farthest from oncoming traffic. The entrance drives are designed for two-way traffic. Therefore, this standard does not apply. NOTICE OF TYPE II DECISION SDR2004-00010/DEZFULLI AUTO SALES PAGE 9 OF 28 The Director has the authority to restrict access when the need to do so is dictated by one or more of the following conditions: To provide for increased traffic movement on congested streets and to eliminate turning movement problems, the Director may restrict the location of driveways on streets and require the location of driveways be placed on adjacent streets, upon the finding that the proposed access would: • Cause or increase existing hazardous traffic conditions; or • Provide inadequate access for emergency vehicles; or • Cause hazardous conditions to exist which would constitute a clear and present danger to the public health, safety, and general welfare. To eliminate the need to use public streets for movements between commercial or industrial properties, parking areas shall be designed to connect with parking areas on adjacent properties unless not feasible. The Director shall require access easements between properties where necessary to provide for parking area connections; To facilitate pedestrian and bicycle traffic, access and parking area plans shall provide efficient sidewalk and/or pathway connections, as feasible, between neighboring developments or land uses; The proposed access points to the subject property are not considered hazardous or constitute a clear and present danger to the public health based on compliance with the spacing criteria of the Access Management Standards addressed above. The proposed access drive on SW Naeve is approximately 150 feet from the intersection of SW Naeve and Pacific Highway. The second access point on SW Royalty Parkway is approximately 150 feet from the intersection of SW Royalty Parkway and SW Naeve Street. Therefore, no access restriction is required. FINDING: Based on the analysis above, the Access, Egress and Circulation standards have been met. ENVIRONMENTAL PERFORMANCE STANDARDS (18.725): Noise: For the purposes of noise regulation, the provisions of Sections 7.40.130 through 7.40.210 of the Tigard Municipal Code shall apply. Visible emissions: Within the commercial zoning districts and the industrial park (IP) zoning district, there shall be no use, operation or activity which results in a stack of other point- source emission from space heating, or the emission of pure uncombined water (steam) which is visible from a property line. Department of Environmental Quality (DEQ) rules for visible emissions (340-21-015 and 340-28-070) apply. Vibration: No vibration other than that caused by highway vehicles, trains and aircraft is permitted in any given zoning district which is discernible without instruments at the property line of the use concerned. Odors: The emission of odorous gases or other matter in such quantities as to be readily detectable at any point beyond the property line of the use creating the odors is prohibited. DEQ rules for odors (340-028-090) apply. Glare and heat: No direct or sky-reflected glare, whether from floodlights or from high temperature processes such as combustion or welding, which is visible at the lot line shall be permitted and; there shall be no emission or transmission of heat or heated air which is discernible at the lot line of the source; and these regulations shall not apply to signs or floodlights in parking areas or constructing equipment at the time of construction or excavation work otherwise permitted by this title. NOTICE OF TYPE II DECISION SDR2004-00010/DEZFULLI AUTO SALES PAGE 10 OF 28 Insects and rodents: All materials including wastes shall be stored and all grounds shall be maintained in a manner which will not attract or aid the propagation of insects or rodents or create a health hazard. The proposed use is used auto sales, which is an outright permitted use within the C-G zoning district. There is no indication within the application that these standards will not be met. However, ongoing efforts to meet these standards shall be maintained and any violation of these standards will be addressed by the City of Tigard's Code Enforcement Officer. FINDING: Based on the above, there is no evidence the Environmental Performance Standards will not be met. Landscaping and Screening (18.745): Street Trees: Section 18.745.040 states that all development projects fronting on a public street or a private drive more than 100 feet in length shall be required to plant street trees in accordance with Section 18.745.040.0 Section 18.745.040.0 requires that street trees be spaced between 20 and 40 feet apart depending on the size classification of the tree at maturity (small, medium or large). The applicant's site plan shows three (3) Karpick Maples along SW Pacific Highway, thirteen (13) Karpick Maples along SW Naeve Street and five (5) along SW Royalty Parkway. According to Section 18.745.040.C, street trees that are medium-sized cannot be spaced greater than 30 feet apart. The proposed street trees are spaced 30 feet apart. This criterion has been satisfied. Buffering and Screening: Section 18.745.080 states that no buffer is required between abutting uses that are of a different type when the uses are separated by a street. No buffer is required between a proposed office use and existing office use. The only property abutting the subject site is the nursery to the south, which is also, zoned C-G General Commercial. Public streets separate properties to the north, east and west. According to Table 18.745.1 (Buffer Matrix) no buffer is required between parking lots and existing uses within the C-G zone. However, the applicant is proposing a 5-foot buffer between the subject property and the property to the south with Japanese Garden Junipers planted within the buffer. This standard has been satisfied. Screening: Special Provisions: Section 18.745.050.E requires the screening of parking and loading areas. Landscaped parking areas shall include special design features which effectively screen the parking lot areas from view. Planting materials to be installed should achieve a relative balance between low lying and vertical shrubbery and trees. Trees shall be planted in landscaped islands in all parking areas, and shall be equally distributed on the basis of one (1) tree for each seven (7) parking spaces in order to provide a canopy effect. The minimum dimension on the landscape islands shall be three (3) feet wide and the landscaping shall be protected from vehicular damage by some form of wheel guard or curb. The applicant is proposing to screen the parking lot with a minimum of a 5-foot landscaped area surrounding the entire property. Parking lot trees have been shown to be planted within landscaped islands on a basis of one (1) for every 7 spaces in order to provide a canopy effect. Therefore, this standard has been satisfied. NOTICE OF TYPE II DECISION SDR2004-00010/DEZFULLI AUTO SALES PAGE 11 OF 28 Screening Of Service Facilities. Except for one-family and two-family dwellings, any refuse container or disposal area and service facilities such as gas meters and air conditioners which would otherwise be visible from a public street, customer or resident parking area, any public facility or any residential area shall be screened from view by placement of a solid wood fence or masonry wall between five and eight feet in height. All refuse materials shall be contained within the screened area; Screening of Service Facilities is addressed under Chapter 18.755 (Mixed Solid Waste and Recyclable Storage). FINDING: Based on the analysis above, the landscaping and screening standards have been met. Mixed Solid Waste and Recyclables Storage (18.755): Chapter 18.755 requires that new construction incorporates functional and adequate space for on-site storage and efficient collection of mixed solid waste and source separated Recyclables prior to pick-up and removal by haulers. The applicant must choose one (1) of the following four (4) methods to demonstrate comp lance: Minimum Standard, Waste Assessment, Comprehensive Recycling Plan, or Franchised Hauler Review and Sign-Off. The applicant will have to submit evidence or a plan which indicates compliance with this section. Regardless of which method chosen, the applicant will have to submit a written sign-off from the franchise hauler regarding the facility location and compatibility. The applicant has chosen to demonstrate compliance with the Minimum Standards Method. According to Minimum Standards, an office use is required to provide a minimum storage area of 10 square feet, plus 4 square feet per 1,000 square feet gross floor area (GFA). The applicant is proposing to develop a 350 square foot building, which will require a 14 square foot storage area. The applicant has proposed a 120 square foot storage area. However, the applicant has not provided a sign-off letter from the franchise hauler regarding the facility location and compatibility. Therefore, the applicant will be required to provide a sign-off letter from the franchise hauler regarding the refuse facility compatibility. Location Standards. To encourage its use, the storage area for source-separated recyclable shall be co- located with the storage area for residual mixed solid waste; Indoor and outdoor storage areas shall comply with Uniform Building and Fire Code requirements; Storage area space requirements can be satisfied with a single location or multiple locations, and can combine both interior and exterior locations; Exterior storage areas can be located within interior side yard or rear yard areas. Exterior storage areas shall not be located within a required front yard setback or in a yard adjacent to a public or private street; Exterior storage areas shall be located in central and visible locations on a site to enhance security for users; Exterior storage areas can be located in a parking area, if the proposed use provides at least the minimum number of parking spaces required for the use after deducting the area used for storage. Storage areas shall be appropriately screened according to the provisions in 18.755.050 C, design standards; The storage area shall be accessible for collection vehicles and located so that the storage area will not obstruct pedestrian or vehicle traffic movement on the site or on public streets adjacent to the site. The refuse container is accessed from the parking lot and is visible in order to enhance security for users. The proposed refuse container is located at the south end of the lot and is not adjacent to any public or private street. Screening will be addressed under Section 18.755.050.0 (Design Standards) of this decision. Therefore, this criterion has been satisfied. Design Standards. The dimensions of the storage area shall accommodate containers consistent with current methods of local collection; Storage containers shall meet Uniform Fire Code standards and be made and covered with waterproof materials or situated in a covered area; Exterior storage areas shall be enclosed by a sight-obscuring fence wall, or hedge at least six feet in height. Gate openings which allow access to users and NOTICE OF TYPE II DECISION SDR2004-00010/DEZFULLI AUTO SALES PAGE 12 OF 28 haulers shall be provided. Gate openings for haulers shall be a minimum of 10 feet wide and shall be capable of being secured in a closed and open position; Storage area(s) and containers shall be clearly labeled to indicate the type of materials accepted. The applicant has proposed that the refuse container is to be enclosed by a 10 x 12 x six foot tall enclosure with a 10-foot-wide opening. Therefore, this standard has been satisfied. FINDING: Because the applicant has not provided evidence of compliance with the Mixed Solid Waste and Recyclables Storage design standards, this standard has not been met. If the applicant complies with the condition listed below, the standards will be met: CONDITION:Provide a sign-off letter from the franchise hauler regarding the refuse facility compatibility. Off-Street Parking and Loading (18.765): Location of vehicle parking: Off-street arking spaces for single-family and duplex dwellings and single-family attached dwellings shall be located on the same lot with the dwellings. Off-street parking lots for uses not listed above shall be located not further than 200 feet from the building or use that they are required to serve, measured in a straight line from the building with the following exceptions: a) commercial and industrial uses which require more than 40 parking spaces may provide for the spaces in excess of the required first 40 spaces up to a distance of 300 feet from the primary site; The 40 parking spaces which remain on the primary site must be available for users in the following order of priority: 1) Disabled-accessible spaces; 2) Short-term spaces; 3) Long-term preferential carpool and vanpool spaces; 4) Long-term spaces. The proposed use is a used car lot. The applicant is proposing to construct an associated 350 square foot sales office. According to the Off-Street Parking standards a use of this type is required to provide 1 parking stall for every 1,000 square feet of building but no less than 4 customer parking stalls. Because the applicant is only proposing a 350 square foot building, only 4 parking stalls are required. The applicant has shown four parking stalls marked as visitor parking stalls within 50 feet of the proposed sales office. Joint Parking: Owners of two or more uses, structures or parcels of land may agree to utilize jointly the same parking and loading spaces when the peak hours of operation do not overlay, subject to the following: 1) The size of the joint parking facility shall be at least as large as the number of vehicle parking spaces required by the larger(est) use per Section 18.765.070; 2) Satisfactory legal evidence shall be presented to the Director in the form of deeds, leases or contracts to establish the joint use; 3) If a joint use arrangement is subsequently terminated, or if the uses change, the requirements of this title thereafter apply to each separately. Joint parking is not proposed with this application. Therefore, this standard does not apply. Parking in Mixed-Use Projects: In mixed-use projects, the required minimum vehicle parking shall be determined using the following formula. 1) Primary use, i.e., that with the largest proportion of total floor area within the development, at 100% of the minimum vehicle parking required for that use in Section 18.765.060; 2) Secondary use, i.e., that with the second largest percentage of total floor area within the development, at 90% of the vehicle parking required for that use in Section 18.765.060; 3) Subsequent use or uses, at 80% of the vehicle parking required for that use(s) in Section 18.765.060; 4) The maximum parking allowance shall be 150% of the total minimum parking as calculated in D.1.-3. above. The project is not considered a mixed-use project. Therefore, this standard does not apply. NOTICE OF TYPE II DECISION SDR2004-00010/DEZFULLI AUTO SALES PAGE 13 OF 28 • Visitor Parking in Multi-Family Residential Developments: Multi-dwelling units with more than 10 required parking spaces shall provide an additional 15% of vehicle parking spaces above the minimum required for the use of guests of residents of the complex. These spaces shall be centrally located or distributed throughout the development. Required bicycle parking facilities shall also be centrally located within or evenly distributed throughout the development. This project does not involve a residential use. Therefore, this standard does not apply. Preferential Long-Term CarpoolNanpool Parking: Parking lots providing in excess of 20 long-term parking spaces shall provide preferential long-term carpool and vanpool parking for employees, students and other regular visitors to the site. At least 5% of total long-term parking spaces shall be reserved for carpool/vanpool use. Preferential parking for carpools/vanpools shall be closer to the main entrances of the building than any other employee or student parking except parking spaces designated for use by the disabled. Preferential carpool/vanpool spaces shall be full-sized per requirements in Section 18.765.040N and shall be clearly designated for use only by carpools and vanpools between 7:00 AM and 5:30 PM Monday through Friday. The proposed use is for a used car lot. Four parking stalls are required and have been shown on the preliminary site plan. Therefore, the parking lot will not exceed 20 long-term parking spaces. This standard does not apply. Disabled-Accessible Parking: All parking areas shall be provided with the required number of parking spaces for disabled persons as specified by the State of Oregon Uniform Building Code and federal standards. Such parking spaces shall be sized, signed and marked as required by these regulations. The applicant is required to provide 4 parking stalls for customer parking. According to the State of Oregon Uniform Building Code and federal standards, a parking lot with 1-25 parking stalls is required to provide 1 stall that is ADA accessible. The site plan does indicate 1 ADA accessible parking stall located 5 feet from the main entrance of the proposed building. Therefore, this criterion has been satisfied. Access Drives: With regard to access to public streets from off-street parking: access drives from the street to off-street parking or loading areas shall be designed and constructed to facilitate the flow of traffic and provide maximum safety for pedestrian and vehicular traffic on the site; the number and size of access drives shall be in accordance with the requirements of Chapter, 18.705, Access, Egress and Circulation; access drives shall be clearly and permanently marked and defined through use of rails, fences, walls or other barriers or markers on frontage not occupied by service drives; access drives shall have a minimum vision clearance in accordance with Chapter 18.795, Visual Clearance; access drives shall be improved with an asphalt or concrete surface; and excluding single-family and duplex residences, except as provided by Subsection 18.810.030.P, groups of two or more parking spaces shall be served by a service drive so that no backing movements or other maneuvering within a street or other public right-of-way will be required. The access drive has been addressed previously in this decision under Chapter 18.705 (Access Egress and Circulation). Submitted plans show access drives to be developed with directional arrows that direct on-site traffic, and stripped pedestrian crossings are shown to be no greater than 36 feet in length. No backward maneuvering into the public right-of-way will be required and access drives will be constructed with asphalt. Therefore, this standard has been satisfied. NOTICE OF TYPE II DECISION SDR2004-00010/DEZFULLI AUTO SALES PAGE 14 OF 28 • Pedestrian Access: Pedestrian access through parking lots shall be provided in accordance with Section 18.705.030.F. Where a parking area or other vehicle area has a drop-off grade separation, the property owner shall install a wall, railing, or other barrier which will prevent a slow-moving vehicle or driverless vehicle from escaping such area and which will prevent pedestrians from walking over drop-off edges. Pedestrian access has been discussed previously in this decision under Chapter 18.705 (Access Egress and Circulation). Therefore, this standard has been satisfied. Parking Lot Striping: Except for single-family and duplex residences, any area intended to be used to meet the off-street parking requirements as contained in this Chapter shall have all parking spaces clearly marked; and all interior drives and access aisles shall be clearly marked and signed to show direction of flow and maintain vehicular and pedestrian safety. The plans submitted show the parking spaces will be clearly marked with striping. Interior drives and access aisles are marked to show direction of traffic on the site. Therefore, this standard has been satisfied. Wheel Stops: Parking spaces along the boundaries of a parking lot or adjacent to interior landscaped areas or sidewalks shall be provided with a wheel stop at least four inches high located three feet back from the front of the parking stall. The front three feet of the parking stall may be concrete, asphalt or low lying landscape material that does not exceed the height of the wheel stop. This area cannot be calculated to meet landscaping or sidewalk requirements. The applicant has shown all parking stalls at the boundary of the subject site to include wheel stops. Therefore, this standard has been satisfied. Space and Aisle Dimensions: Section 18.765.040.N states that: "except as modified for angled parking in Figures 18.765.1 and 18.765.2 the minimum dimensions for parking spaces are: 8.5 feet x 18.5 feet for a standard space and 7.5 feet x 16.5 feet for a compact space; aisles accommodating two direction traffic, or allowing access from both ends, shall be 24 feet in width. The applicant's plans indicate that all parking stalls will meet the minimum dimensions for standard parking stalls. However, access isles are not consistently 24 feet wide throughout the property.. Therefore, the applicant is required to submit a plan showing 24-foot-wide access isles in order to accommodate two-direction traffic. All drive isles must be maintained free of parked cars. Bicycle Parking Location and Access: Section 18.765.050 states bicycle parking areas shall be provided at locations within 50 feet of primary entrances to structures; bicycle parking areas shall not be located within parking aisles, landscape areas or pedestrian ways; outdoor bicycle parking shall be visible from on-site buildings and/or the street When the bicycle parking area is not visible from the street, directional signs shall be used to located the parking area; and bicycle parking may be located inside a building on a floor which has an outdoor entrance open for use and floor location which does not require the bicyclist to use stairs to gain access to the space. Exceptions may be made to the latter requirement for parking on upper stories within a multi-story residential building. According to Table 18.765.2 of the Tigard Development Code, the minimum bicycle-parking requirement for a motor vehicle sales use is 0.2 spaces per 1,000 square feet. However, the proposed sales office will be approximately 350 square feet. According to Section 18.765.050.E, the minimum bicycle parking a use may have is 2 stalls. The applicant has shown an area dedicated to bicycle parking, but has not indicated how many parking stalls will be erected. NOTICE OF TYPE II DECISION •SDR2004-00010/DEZFULLI AUTO SALES PAGE 15 OF 28 The proposed bicycle parking area is within 50 feet of the primary entrance of the sales office, is visible from the SW ■aeve Street and does not block pedestrian traffic. Therefore, the applicant is required to submit a plan showing the bicycle parking structure to include no less than 2 bicycle parking stalls. Bicycle Parking Design Requirements: Section 18.765.050.C. The following design requirements apply to the installation of bicycle racks: The racks required for required bicycle parking spaces shall ensure that bicycles may be securely locked to them without undue inconvenience. Provision of bicycle lockers for long-term (employee) parking is encouraged but not required; bicycle racks must be securely anchored to the ground, wall or other structure; bicycle parking spaces shall be at least 21/2 feet by six feet long, and, when covered, with a vertical clearance of seven feet. An access aisle of at least five feet wide shall be provided and maintained beside or between each row of bicycle parking; each required bicycle parking space must be accessible without moving another bicycle; required bicycle parking spaces may not be rented or leased except where required motor vehicle parking is rented or leased. At-cost or deposit fees for bicycle parking are exempt from this requirement; and areas set aside for required bicycle parking must be clearly reserved for bicycle parking only. Outdoor bicycle parking facilities shall be surfaced with a hard surfaced material, i.e., pavers, asphalt, concrete or similar material. This surface must be designed to remain well drained. The applicant has not provided a detail of the bike rack to be used; therefore, the applicant will be required to provide a plan that shows the bicycle rack designed according to Section 18.765.050.C. of the Tigard Development Code. Minimum Bicycle Parking Requirements: The total number of required bicycle parking spaces for each use is specified in Table 18.765.2 in Section 18.765.070.H. In no case shall there be less than two bicycle parking spaces. As discussed above, according to Table 18.765.2 of the Tigard Development Code, the minimum bicycle-parking requirement for a vehicle sales use is 0.2 spaces per 1,000 square feet. Therefore, the proposed 350 square foot building is required to provide a minimum of a 2 stall bicycle rack, which has been conditioned above. Minimum Off-Street Parking: Section 18.765.070.H states that the minimum and maximum parking shall be as required in Table 18.765.2. Table 18.765.2 states that the minimum parking for a Vehicle Sales Use is 1.0 space per 1,000 square feet but no less than 4.0. Based on a 30 square foot building, the applicant is required to provide a minimum of 4 parking stalls. The applicant has indicated that 4 customer parking stalls will be available. Therefore, this standard has been satisfied. Off-Street Loading Spaces: Commercial, industrial and institutional buildings or structures to be built or altered which receive and distribute material or merchandise by truck shall provide and maintain off-street loading and maneuvering space as follows: A minimum of one loading space is required for buildings with 10,000 gross square feet or more; A minimum of two loading spaces for buildings with 40,000 gross square feet or more. The proposed site will be constructed with a sales office that is 350 square feet. Therefore, this standard does not apply. FINDING: Based on the analysis above, the off-street parking and loading standards have not been fully met, however, if the applicant complies with the conditions listed below, the standards will be fully met: NOTICE OF TYPE II DECISION SDR2004-00010/DEZFULLI AUTO SALES PAGE 16 OF 28 CONDITIONS: • Submit a plan showing 24-foot-wide access isles in order to accommodate two-direction traffic. All drive isles must be maintained free of parked cars. • Submit a plan showing the bicycle parking structure to include no less than 2 bicycle parking stalls. • Provide a plan that shows the bicycle rack designed according to Section 18.765.050.0 of the Tigard Development Code. Signs (18.780): Chapter 18.780.130.D lists the type of allowable signs and sign area permitted in the MUE Zoning District. Signs are reviewed through a separate permit process administered by the Development Services Technicians. FINDING: Because signs will be reviewed and approved as part of a separate permit process, this standard has been satisfied. Tree Removal (18.790): Section 18.790.030 requires that a tree plan for the planting, removal and protection of trees prepared by a certified arborist shall be provided with a site development review application. The tree plan shall include identification of all existing trees, identification of a program to save existing trees or mitigate tree removal over 12 inches in caliper, which trees are to be removed, protection program defining standards and methods that will be used by the applicant to protect trees during and after construction. According to the applicant's arborist, there are a total of 12 trees equal to or greater than 12- inches in diameter. Five of the trees greater than 12-inches are considered hazardous, leaving seven trees that are subject to preservation and/or removal. The narrative suggests that five of the viable trees are to be retained. The tree removal plan shows all trees except for two to be removed. The tree removal plan, the arborist report and the narrative do not correlate with each other. Therefore, the applicant is required to provide a new tree removal/protection/mitigation plan that correlates with the project arborists report. The required plan must be accompanied with a letter from the project arborist that acknowledges his or her review and approval. Any variation from the resubmitted plan will require an additional type II review. FINDING: Based on the analysis above, the tree removal standards have not been fully met. If the applicant complies with the condition listed below, the standards will be met: CONDITION:Provide a new tree removal/protection/mitigation plan that correlates with the project arborists report. The required plan must be accompanied with a letter from the project arborist that acknowledges his or her review and approval. Any variation from the resubmitted plan will require an additional type II review. Visual Clearance Areas (18.795): Chapter 18.795 requires that a clear vision area shall be maintained on the corners of all property adjacent to intersecting right-of-ways or the intersection of a public street and a private driveway. A clear vision area shall contain no vehicle, hedge, planting, fence, wall structure, or temporary or permanent obstruction exceeding three (3) feet in height. The code provides that obstructions that may be located in this area shall be visually clear between three (3) and eight (8) feet in height (8) (trees may be placed within this area provided that all branches below eight (8) feet are removed). A visual clearance area is the triangular area formed by measuring a 30-foot distance along the street right- of-way and the driveway, and then connecting these two (2), 30-foot distance points with a straight line. The applicant has indicated in the narrative and the site plan that a clear vision area will be maintained between 3 and 8 feet in height at the vehicular access of the property. NOTICE OF TYPE II DECISION SDR2004-00010/DEZFULLI AUTO SALES PAGE 17 OF 28 FINDING: Based on the analysis above, the vision clearance standards have been met. C. SPECIFIC SITE DEVELOPMENT REVIEW APPROVAL STANDARDS Section 18.360.090(A)(2) through 18.360.090(A)(15) provides additional Site Development Review approval standards not necessarily covered by the provisions of the previously listed sections. These additional standards are addressed immediately below with the following exceptions: The proposal contains no elements related to the provisions of the following and are, therefore, found to be inapplicable as approval standards: 18.360.090.3 (Exterior Elevations);); 18.360.090.5 (Privacy and Noise: Multi-family or Group Living Uses); 18.360.090.6 (Private Outdoor Areas: Multi-family Use); 18.360.090.7 (Shared Outdoor Recreation Areas: Multi-family Use); 18.360.090.8 (100-year floodplain); and 18.360.090.9 (Demarcation of Spaces). The following sections were discussed previously in this decision and, therefore, will not be addressed in this section: 18.360.090.4 (Buffering, Screening and Compatibility Between Adjoining Uses; 18.360.090.13 Parking); 18.360.090.14 (Landscaping); 18.360.090.15 (Drainage); and 18.360.090.14 (Provision for the Disabled). Relationship to the Natural and Physical Environment: Buildings shall be: located to preserve existing trees, topography and natural drainage where possible based upon existing site conditions; located in areas not subject to ground slumping or sliding; located to provide adequate distance between adjoining buildings for adequate light, air circulation, and fire-fighting; and oriented with consideration for sun and wind. Trees shall be preserved to the extent possible. Replacement of trees is subject to the requirements of Chapter 18.790, Tree Removal. According to the applicant, the proposed building will have no impact on existing trees located on the site. Drainage is addressed later in this decision under Chapter 18.810 (Street and Utility Improvement Standards). The abutting parcel to the south is developed with a building that is approximately 56 feet away thus providing adequate light, air circulation, and fire-fighting access. Tree retention is discussed under Chapter 18.790 (Tree Removal) of this decision. Crime Prevention and Safety: • Windows shall be located so that areas vulnerable to crime can be surveyed by the occupants; • Interior laundry and service areas shall be located in a way that they can be observed by others; • Mail boxes shall be located in lighted areas having vehicular or pedestrian traffic; • The exterior lighting levels shall be selected and the angles shall be oriented towards areas vulnerable to crime; and • Light fixtures shall be provided in areas having heavy pedestrian or vehicular traffic and in potentially dangerous areas such as parking lots, stairs, ramps and abrupt grade changes. Fixtures shall be placed at a height so that light patterns overlap at a height of seven feet, which is sufficient to illuminate a person. The applicant has indicated that security measures will be addressed; however, the site plan does not show the proposed sales office or indicate parking lot lighting. Therefore, the applicant must submit a plan showing parking lot lighting and an elevation of the proposed sales office that shows windows and point of access. NOTICE OF TYPE II DECISION SDR2004-00010IDEZFULLI AUTO SALES PAGE 18 OF 28 Public Transit: Provisions within the plan shall be included for providing for transit if the development proposal is adjacent to existing or proposed transit route; the requirements for transit facilities shall be based on: the location of other transit facilities in the area; and the size and type of the proposal. The following facilities may be required after City and Tri-Met review: bus stop shelters; turnouts for buses; and connecting paths to the shelters. The site has frontage on SW Pacific Highway, which is a Tri-Met transit route. However, Tri-Met did not mention the need for an additional bus stop. The closest bus stop is approximately 500 feet from the subject site to the south at the corner of SW Pacific Highway and SW Royalty Parkway. Therefore, this standard does not apply. Provisions of the Underlying Zone: All of the provisions and regulations of the underlying zone shall apply unless modified by other sections or this title, e.g., Planned Developments, Chapter 18.350; or a variance or adjustment granted under Chapter 18.370. Dimensional Requirements: Provisions of the (C-G) Professional Commercial Zoning District have been addressed earlier in this decision under Section 18.520.040.B. FINDING: Based on the analysis above, the specific standards of the Site Development Review Section have not been met. CONDITION:Submit a plan showing parking lot lighting and an elevation of the proposed sales office that shows windows and point of access. D. Street And Utility Improvements Standards (Section 18.810): Chapter 18.810 provides construction standards for the implementation of public and private facilities and utilities such as streets, sewers, and drainage. The applicable standards are addressed below: Streets: Improvements: Section 18.810.030.A.1 states that streets within a development and streets adjacent shall be improved in accordance with the TDC standards. Section 18.810.030.A.2 states that any new street or additional street width planned as a portion of an existing street shall be dedicated and improved in accordance with the TDC. Minimum Rights-of-Way and Street Widths: Section 18.810.030.E requires a 5-lane Arterial Street to have a 104 foot right-of-way width and 72-foot paved section. Other improvements required may include on-street parking, sidewalks and bikeways, underground utilities, street lighting, storm drainage, and street trees. This site lies adjacent to SW Pacific Highway, which is classified as a 5-lane Arterial on the City of Tigard Transportation Plan Map. At present, there is approximately 125 feet of ROW total, according to the most recent tax assessor's map. The applicant should dedicate ROW at the radius for the intersection of Naeve Street and Pacific Highway. SW Pacific Highway is currently partially improved. In order to mitigate the impact from this development, the applicant should construct a 10-foot sidewalk at the ultimate location with a 5-foot planter strip, plant ODOT approved street trees and taper the sidewalk at the south end of their frontage back to the Nursery access and provide an ADA ramp. Section 18.810.030.E requires Neighborhood Routes to have a 54 foot right-of-way width and 32-foot paved section. Other improvements required may include on-street parking, sidewalks and bikeways, underground utilities, street lighting, storm drainage, and street trees. NOTICE OF TYPE II DECISION SDR2004-00010/DEZFULLI AUTO SALES PAGE 19 OF 28 This site lies adjacent to SW Naeve Street and Royalty Parkway, which are both classified as Neighborhood Routes on the City of Tigard Transportation Plan Map. At present, there is approximately 20 feet of ROW from centerline along the Naeve Street frontage, according to the most recent tax assessor's map. The applicant should dedicate the additional ROW to provide 27 feet from centerline and the radius at both intersections. There is 60 feet of ROW for Royalty Parkway. No additional ROW is required. SW Naeve Street is currently partially improved. In order to mitigate the impact from this development, the applicant should construct half-street improvements to the Neighborhood Route standard. SW Royalty Parkway is currently partially improved. In order to mitigate the impact from this development, the applicant should construct a 5-foot curb tight sidewalk along this frontage and plant street trees in accordance with the TDC. Future Street Plan and Extension of Streets: Section 18.810.030.F states that a future street plan shall be filed which shows the pattern of existing and proposed future streets from the boundaries of the proposed land division. This section also states that where it is necessary to give access or permit a satisfactory future division of adjoining land, streets shall be extended to the boundary lines of the tract to be developed and a barricade shall be constructed at the end of the street. These street stubs to adjoining properties are not considered to be cul-de-sacs since they are intended to continue as through streets at such time as the adjoining property is developed. A barricade shall be constructed at the end of the street by the property owners which shall not be removed until authorized by the City Engineer, the cost of which shall be included in the street construction cost. Temporary hammerhead turnouts or temporary cul-de-sac bulbs shall be constructed for stub streets in excess of 150 feet in length. No future streets are proposed. There are streets along 3 frontages and no opportunity to provide another street extension. Street Alignment and Connections: Section 18.810.030.H.1 states that full street connections with spacing of no more than 530 feet between connections is required except where prevented by barriers such as topography, railroads, freeways, pre-existing developments, lease provisions, easements, covenants or other restrictions existing prior to May 1, 1995 which preclude street connections. A full street connection may also be exempted due to a regulated water feature if regulations would not permit construction. Section 18.810.030.H.2 states that all local, neighborhood routes and collector streets which abut a development site shall be extended within the site to provide through circulation when not precluded by environmental or topographical constraints, existing development patterns or strict adherence to other standards in this code. A street connection or extension is precluded when it is not possible to redesign, or reconfigure the street pattern to provide required extensions. Land is considered topographically constrained if the slope is greater than 15% for a distance of 250 feet or more. In the case of environmental or topographical constraints, the mere presence of a constraint is not sufficient to show that a street connection is not possible. The applicant must show why the constraint precludes some reasonable street connection. There are no opportunities or advantages to providing another street connection or extension through this development. Grades and Curves: Section 18.810.030.N states that grades shall not exceed ten percent on arterials, 12% on collector streets, or 12% on any other street (except that local or residential access streets may have segments with grades up to 15% for distances of no greater than 250 feet). Centerline radii of curves shall be as determined by the City Engineer. The street grades for all three streets are significantly lower than 12% and meet this criterion. NOTICE OF TYPE II DECISION SDR2004-00010/DEZFULLI AUTO SALES PAGE 20 OF 28 Access to Arterials and Major Collectors: Section 18.810.030.Q states that where a development abuts or is traversed by an existing or proposed arterial or major collector street, the development design shall provide adequate protection for residential properties and shall separate residential access and through traffic, or if separation is not feasible, the design shall minimize the traffic conflicts. The design shall include any of the following: • A parallel access street along the arterial or major collector; • Lots of suitable depth abutting the arterial or major collector to provide adequate buffering with frontage along another street; • Screen planting at the rear or side property line to be contained in a non-access reservation along the arterial or major collector; or • Other treatment suitable to meet the objectives of this subsection; • If a lot has access to two streets with different classifications, primary access should be from the lower classification street. The applicant has not proposed to access directly to Pacific Highway. Rather, access will be provided onto both of the other lower classification streets. Lots - Size and Shape: Section 18.810.060(A) prohibits lot depth from being more than 2.5 times the average lot width, unless the parcel is less than 1.5 times the minimum lot size of the applicable zoning district. There is no minimum lot size within the C-G zoning district. Therefore, this standard does not apply. Lot Frontage: Section 18.810.060(B) requires that lots have at least 25 feet of frontage on public or private streets, other than an alley. In the case of a land partition, 18.420.050.A.4.c applies, which requires a parcel to either have a minimum 15-foot frontage or a minimum 15-foot wide recorded access easement. In cases where the lot is for an attached single-family dwelling unit, the frontage shall be at least 15 feet. The subject site has approximately 200 feet of frontage on SW Royalty Parkway and 440 feet along SW Naeve Street. Therefore, this standard has been satisfied. Sidewalks: Section 18.810.070.A requires that sidewalks be constructed to meet City design standards and be located on both sides of arterial, collector and local residential streets. Private streets and industrial streets shall have sidewalks on at least one side. The applicant's plans indicate they will construct sidewalk along all three frontages as part of their half-street improvements, thereby meeting this criterion. Sanitary Sewers: Sewers Required: Section 18.810.090.A requires that sanitary sewer be installed to serve each new development and to connect developments to existing mains in accordance with the provisions set forth in Design and Construction Standards for Sanitary and Surface Water Management (as adopted by Clean Water Services in 1996 and including any future revisions or amendments) and the adopted policies of the comprehensive plan. Over-sizing: Section 18.810.090.0 states that proposed sewer systems shall include consideration of additional development within the area as projected by the Comprehensive Plan. The applicant's plans indicate they will provide a lateral to the proposed building from the public sewer located in Royalty Parkway. Storm Drainage: General Provisions: Section 18.810.100.A requires developers to make adequate provisions for storm water and flood water runoff. NOTICE OF TYPE II DECISION SDR2004-00010/DEZFULLI AUTO SALES PAGE 21 OF 28 Accommodation of Upstream Drainage: Section 18.810.100.0 states that a culvert or other drainage facility shall be large enough to accommodate potential runoff from its entire upstream drainage area, whether inside or outside the development. The City Engineer shall approve the necessary size of the facility, based on the provisions of Design and Construction Standards for Sanitary and Surface Water Management (as adopted by Clean Water Services in 2000 and including any future revisions or amendments). There are no impacts from upstream drainage. Effect on Downstream Drainage: Section 18.810.100.D states that where it is anticipated by the City Engineer that the additional runoff resulting from the development will overload an existing drainage facility, the Director and Engineer shall withhold approval of the development until provisions have been made for improvement of the potential condition or until provisions have been made for storage of additional runoff caused by the development in accordance with the Design and Construction Standards for Sanitary and Surface Water Management (as adopted by Clean Water Services in 2000 and including any future revisions or amendments). In 1997, Clean Water Services (CWS) completed a basin study of Fanno Creek and adopted the Fanno Creek Watershed Management Plan. Section V of that plan includes a recommendation that local governments institute a stormwater detention/effective impervious area reduction program resulting in no net increase in storm peak flows up to the 25-year event. The City will require that all new developments resulting in an increase of impervious surfaces provide onsite detention facilities, unless the development is located adjacent to Fanno Creek. For those developments adjacent to Fanno Creek, the storm water runoff will be permitted to discharge without detention. The applicant shows stormwater being directed to both the system in Pacific Highway and in Royalty Parkway. The detention calculations only cover the portion directed to Pacific Highway. The engineer shall submit detention calculations with the PFI for the portion directed to Royalty Parkway. The applicant must have ODOT review and approve the detention calculations for the stormwater directed to Pacific Highway. All work within Pacific Highway will require an ODOT facility permit. Bikeways and Pedestrian Pathways: Bikeway Extension: Section 18.810.110.A states that developments adjoining proposed bikeways identified on the City's adopted pedestrian/bikeway plan shall include provisions for the future extension of such bikeways through the dedication of easements or right-of-way. Pacific Highway has an existing bicycle lane, therefore this criterion is met. Utilities: Section 18.810.120 states that all utility lines, but not limited to those required for electric, communication, lighting and cable television services and related facilities shall be placed underground, except for surface mounted transformers, surface mounted connection boxes and meter cabinets which may be placed above ground, temporary utility service facilities during construction, high capacity electric lines operating at 50,000 volts or above, and: • The developer shall make all necessary arrangements with the serving utility to provide the underground services; • The City reserves the right to approve location of all surface mounted facilities; • All underground utilities, including sanitary sewers and storm drains installed in streets by the developer, shall be constructed prior to the surfacing of the streets; and • Stubs for service connections shall be long enough to avoid disturbing the street improvements when service connections are made. NOTICE OF TYPE II DECISION SDR2004-00010/DEZFULLI AUTO SALES PAGE 22 OF 28 Exception to Under-Grounding Requirement: Section 18.810.120.0 states that a developer shall pay a fee in-lieu of under-grounding costs when the development is proposed to take place on a street where existing utilities which are not underground will serve the development and the approval authority determines that the cost and technical difficulty of under-grounding the utilities outweighs the benefit of under-grounding in conjunction with the development. The determination shall be on a case-by-case basis. The most common, but not the only, such situation is a short frontage development for which under-grounding would result in the placement of additional poles, rather than the removal of above-ground utilities facilities. An applicant for a development which is served by utilities which are not underground and which are located across a public right-of-way from the applicant's property shall pay a fee in-lieu of under-grounding. There are existing overhead utility lines along the frontage of SW Naeve Street. If the fee in- lieu is proposed, it is equal to $35.00 per lineal foot of street frontage that contains the overhead lines. The frontage along this site is 430 lineal feet; therefore the fee would be $15,050. If the site it served with power from Naeve Street then there is no required fee. ADDITIONAL CITY AND/OR AGENCY CONCERNS WITH STREET AND UTILITY IMPROVEMENT STANDARDS: Public Water System: The City of Tigard provides service in this area. There is an existing water line in Naeve Street and the applicant shows a service off of this line. Storm Water Quality: The City has agreed to enforce Surface Water Management (SWM) regulations established by Clean Water Services (CWS) Design and Construction Standards (adopted by Resolution and Order No. 00-7) which require the construction of on-site water quality facilities. The facilities shall be designed to remove 65 percent of the phosphorus contained in 100 percent of the storm water runoff generated from newly created impervious surfaces. In addition, a maintenance plan shall be submitted indicating the frequency and method to be used in keeping the facility maintained through the year. Prior to construction, the applicant shall submit plans and calculations for a water quality facility that will meet the intent of the CWS Design Standards. In addition, the applicant shall submit a maintenance plan for the facility that must be reviewed and approved by the City prior to construction. ODOT will have to approve the water quality calculations for the portion of the site runoff directed to Pacific Highway. The City will have to review and approve the water quality calculations for the portion of the site runoff directed to Royalty Parkway. To ensure compliance with Clean Water Services design and construction standards, the applicant shall employ the design engineer responsible for the design and specifications of the private water quality facility to perform construction and visual observation of the water quality facility for compliance with the design and specifications. These inspections shall be made at significant stages throughout the project and at completion of the construction. Prior to final building inspection, the design engineer shall provide the City of Tigard (Inspection Supervisor) with written confirmation that the water quality facility is in compliance with the design and specifications. Grading and Erosion Control: CWS Clesign and Construction Standards also regulate erosion control to reduce the amount of sediment and other pollutants reaching the public storm and surface water system resulting from development, construction, grading, excavating, clearing, and any other activity which accelerates erosion. Per CWS regulations, the applicant is required to submit an erosion control plan for City review and approval prior to issuance of City permits. NOTICE OF TYPE II DECISION SDR2004-00010/DEZFULLI AUTO SALES PAGE 23 OF 28 The Federal Clean Water Act requires that a National Pollutant Discharge Elimination System (NPDES) erosion control permit be issued for any development that will disturb one or more acre of land. Since this site is over five acres, the developer will be required to obtain an NPDES permit from the City prior to construction. This permit will be issued along with the site and/or building permit. Site Permit Required: The applicant is required to obtain a Site Permit from the Building Division to cover all on-site private utility installations (water, sewer, storm, etc.) and driveway construction. This permit shall be obtained prior to approval of the final plat. Address Assignments: The City of Tigard is responsible for assigning addresses for parcels within the City of Tigard and within the Urban Service Boundary (USB). An addressing fee in the amount of $50.00 per address shall be assessed. This fee shall be paid to the City prior to issuance of building permits. E. IMPACT STUDY (18.390) Section 18.360.090 states, "The Director shall make a finding with respect to each of the following criteria when approving, approving with conditions or denying an application:" Section 18.390.040 states that the applicant shall provide an impact study to quantify the effect of development on public facilities and services. For each public facility system and type of impact, the study shall propose improvements necessary to meet City standard, and to minimize the impact of the development on the public at large, public facilities systems, and affected private property users. In situations where the Community Development Code requires the dedication of real property interests, the applicant shall either specifically concur with a requirement for public right-of-way dedication, or provide evidence that supports that the real property dedication is not roughly proportional to the projected impacts of the development. Section 18.390.040 states that when a condition of approval requires the transfer to the public of an interest in real property, the approval authority shall adopt findings which support the conclusion that the interest in real property to be transferred is roughly proportional to the impact the proposed development will have on the public. The applicant has provided an impact study addressing the project's impacts on public systems. The Washington County Traffic Impact Fee (TIF) is a mitigation measure that is required at the time of development. Based on a transportation impact study prepared by Mr. David Larson for the A-Boy Expansion/Dolan II/Resolution 95-61, TIF's are expected to recapture 32 percent of the traffic impact of new development on the Collector and Arterial Street system. The applicant will be required to pay TIF's of approximately $1,130.84 based on the use proposed. Based on the estimate that total TIF fees cover 32 percent of the impact on major street improvements citywide, a fee that would cover 100 percent of this projects traffic impact is $3,534($1,130.84 divided by .32). The difference between the TIF paid, and the full impact, is considered the unmitigated impact on the collector and arterial street system. The unmitigated impact of this project on the transportation system is $2,403. Tigard's Development Code section 18.810 requires that streets must be brought up to city standards for a development project to be approved. The applicant has proposed to construct half- street improvements along SW Naeve Street and SW Royalty Parkway since this is the frontage from which they are obtaining access. Therefore, this section is satisfied. SECTION VII. OTHER STAFF COMMENTS The City of Tigard Police Department has reviewed the proposal and has offered the following comments: Request lighting plan for exterior. NOTICE OF TYPE II DECISION SDR2004-00010/DEZFULLI AUTO SALES PAGE 24 OF 28 The City of Tigard's Forester has reviewed the proposal and has offered comments. A full version of the City Forester's comments can be found in the land-use file. Below is a list of the Forester's recommended conditions of approval. RECOMMENDED CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL: The applicant shall submit a final Tree Protection Plan that shows exactly how far the tree protection fencing will be from the face of each protected tree (including those on neighboring properties where construction occurs within the trees' driplines) that will be impacted by construction activities within its dripline. The applicant, through their Project Arborist, shall justify the close proximity of the construction activities to the trees. He shall certify that the activities will not adversely impact the overall and long-term health and stability of each tree. Any construction that occurs within the neighboring trees' driplines should be ustified by the applicant and approved by the City Forester and neighboring property owner(s). Work may proceed within the driplines only with the approval of the City Forester. The Project Arborist shall submit written reports to the City Forester, at least, once every two weeks, as he monitors the construction activities and progress. These reports should include any changes that occurred to the TPZ as well as the condition and location of the tree protection fencing. If the amount of TPZ was reduced then the Project Arborist shall justify why the fencing was moved, and shall certify that the construction activities to the trees did not adversely impact the overall and long-term health and stability of the tree(s). If the reports are not submitted or received by the City Forester at the scheduled intervals, and if it appears the TPZ's or the Tree Protection Plan is not being followed by the contractor, the City can stop work on the project until an inspection can be done by the City Forester and the Project Arborist. This inspection will be to evaluate the tree rotection fencing, determine if the fencing was moved at any point during construction, and determine if any part of the Tree Protection Plan has been violated. Prior to issuance of building permits the Project Arborist shall submit to the City Forester a final report describing how the Tree Protection Plan was implemented and detailing any failures to comply with the Tree Protection Plan. The report shall also describe the health of all remaining trees on the site, with details provided as to any tree that has had its root system disturbed or that has otherwise been damaged. If you have any questions please call me anytime. Thank you for requesting my comments on this project The City of Tigard Building Division has reviewed the proposal and offered the following comments: • Building at south property line appears to be to close to property line. No scale on plans to determine distance. SECTION VIII. AGENCY COMMENTS Tualatin Valley Fire and Rescue has reviewed the proposal and has offered the following comments: 1) SURFACE AND LOAD CAPACITIES: Fire apparatus access roads shall be of an all- weather surface that is easily distinguishable from the surrounding area and is capable of supporting not less than 12,500 pounds point load (wheel load) and 75,000 pounds live load (gross vehicle weight). You may need to provide documentation from a registered engineer that the design will be capable of supporting such loading. 2) TURNING RADIUS: The inside turning radius and outside turning radius shall be not less than 28 feet and 48 feet respectively, measured from the same center point. NOTICE OF TYPE II DECISION SDR2004-00010/DEZFULLI AUTO SALES PAGE 25 OF 28 3) PAINTED CURBS: Where required, fire apparatus access roadway curbs shall be painted red and marked "NO PARKING FIRE LANE" at approved intervals. Lettering shall have a stroke of not less than one inch wide by six inches high. Lettering shall be white on red background. 4) COMMERCIAL BUILDINGS - REQUIRED FIRE FLOW: The required fire flow for the building shall not exceed 3,000 gallons per minute (GPM) or the available GPM in the water delivery system at 20 psi, whichever is less as calculated using IFC, Appendix B. A worksheet for calculating the required fire flow is available from the Fire Marshal's Office. 5) FIRE HYDRANTS — COMMERCIAL BUILDINGS: Where a portion of the building is more than 400 feet from a hydrant on a fire apparatus access road, as measured in an approved route around the exterior of the building, on-site fire hydrants and mains shall be provided. This distance may be increased to 600 feet for buildings equipped throughout with an approved automatic sprinkler system. 6) FIRE HYDRANT NUMBER AND DISTRIBUTION: The minimum number and distribution of fire hydrants available to a building shall not be less than that listed in Appendix C, Table C 105.1. Considerations for placing fire hydrants may be as follows: • Existing hydrants in the area may be used to meet the required number of hydrants as approved. Hydrants that are up to 600 feet away from the nearest point of a subject building that is protected with fire sprinklers may contribute to the required number of hydrants. • Hydrants that are separated from the subject building by railroad tracks shall not contribute to the required number of hydrants unless approved by the fire code official. • Hydrants that are separated from the subject building by divided highways or freeways shall not contribute to the required number of hydrants. Heavily traveled collector streets only as approved by the fire code official. • Hydrants that are accessible only by a bridge shall be acceptable to contribute to the required number of hydrants only if approved by the fire code official. 7) FIRE HYDRANT DISTANCE FROM AN ACCESS ROAD: Fire hydrants shall be located not more than 15 feet from an approved fire apparatus access roadway. 8) REFLECTIVE HYDRANT MARKERS: Fire hydrant locations shall be identified by the installation of reflective markers. The markers shall be blue. They shall be located adjacent and to the side of the centerline of the access road way that the fire hydrant is located on. In case that there is no center line, then assume a centerline, and place the reflectors accordingly 9) ACCESS AND FIRE FIGHTING WATER SUPPLY DURING CONSTRUCTION: Approved fire apparatus access roadways and fire fighting water supplies shall be installed and operational prior to any combustible construction or storage of combustible materials on the site. The Oregon Department of Transportation has reviewed the proposal and offered the following comments: NOTICE OF TYPE II DECISION SDR2004-00010/DEZFULLI AUTO SALES PAGE 26 OF 28 • Curb, sidewalk and bikeways shall be constructed consistent with the local Transportation System Plan and Regional Transportation Plan (if applicable) to current local, ODOT/ADA standards to provide pedestrian and bicycle access to the site. • Right of way dedication as necessary to accommodate the planned cross section identified in the Transportation System Plan shall be provided through deed to the Oregon Department of Transportation. • An ODOT Miscellaneous Permit is required for all work in the highway right of way. • An ODOT Drainage Permit is required for connection to state highway drainage facilities. Connection will only be considered if the site's drainage naturally enters ODOT right of way. The applicant must provide ODOT District with a preliminary drainage plan showing impacts to the highway right of way. A drainage study prepared by an Oregon Registered Professional Engineer is usually required by ODOT if: 1. Total peak runoff entering the highway right of way is greater than 1.77 cubic feet per second; or 2. The improvements create an increase of the impervious surface area greater than 10,758 square feet. The City of King City has reviewed the proposal and has no objection to it. SECTION IX. PROCEDURE AND APPEAL INFORMATION Notice: Notice was posted at City Hall and mailed to: X The applicant and owners X Owner of record within the required distance X Affected government agencies Final Decision: THIS DECISION IS FINAL ON MARCH 16, 2005 AND BECOMES EFFECTIVE ON MARCH 31, 2005 UNLESS AN APPEAL IS FILED. Appeal: The decision of the Director (Type II Procedure) or Review Authority (Type II Administrative Appeal or Type III Procedure) is final for purposes of appeal on the date that it is mailed. Any party with standing as provided in Section 18.390.040.G.1. may appeal this decision in accordance with Section 18.390.040.G.2. of the Tigard Community Development Code which provides that a written appeal together with the required fee shall be filed with the Director within ten (10) business days of the date the notice of the decision was mailed. The appeal fee schedule and forms are available from the Planning Division of Tigard City Hall, 13125 SW Hall Boulevard, Tigard, Oregon 97223. NOTICE OF TYPE II DECISION SDR2004-00010/DEZFULLI AUTO SALES PAGE 27 OF 28 Unless the applicant is the appellant, the hearing on an appeal from the Director's Decision shall be confined to the specific issues identified in the written comments submitted by the parties during the comment period. Additional evidence concerning issues properly raised in the Notice of Appeal may be submitted by any party during the appeal hearing, subject to any additional rules of procedure that may be adopted from time to time by the appellate body. THE DEADLINE FOR FILING AN APPEAL IS AT 5:00 PM ON MARCH 30, 2005. Questions: If you have any questions, please call the City of Tigard Planning Division, Tigard City Hall, 13125 SW Hall Boulevard, Tigard, Oregon at (503) 639-4171. 7/77 ti March 16, 2005 PREPA : %r Mae Schelde er DATE 99 Associate Planner ter_ / March 16, 2005 APPR VED BY: Richard H. wersdorff DATE Planning Manager I:\curpin\mathew\sdr\SDR2004-00010.dec.dot NOTICE OF TYPE II DECISION SDR2004-00010/DEZFULLI AUTO SALES PAGE 28 OF 28 If CITY of OIGARD ■ L GEOGftAPMIC INF Ofl MATION SYSTEM VICINITY MAP K. 40 Ill �- SDR2004-00010= ce- lot; 0�°°, , . ' '00000 a000 ,000A), ,., 00 0 o DELFULLI AUTO SALES oo°°boo 0 C % %aoo 0 O _ cn� ##: 0° 100 - * a % E3 )). 10 *0 <IF O a , a PPLII ■ guimilfeCal a V euLi R(TR• -:� � , ra® a VI 0 1 etir . o 0 0 0 ° _o_ 0 0 00 = °oo°o,, r R o 0 0000 A ' ° 0000 —� 1441' ♦ °0°000 0 °0 0 00=d. ♦ 1�' O OHO O O ,==== O 0 100 200 300 400 Feet 0 0 ♦ o o = Ot/ 1'�311 feet ib, ♦♦ _ 0 l0 t� c=3 r�W g.:ice .kj Pr ♦ o U 0 00 _■ ‘t-L ♦ °o°oOOaC ' - • City of Tigard ' _ 4111111' . Information on this map is for general location only and should be verified with the Development Services Division. =0 I= 13125 SW Hall Blvd Tigard,OR 97223 • (p o \ ' (503)639.1171 • 0 \) httpi/eAwa.ci.tgard.Onus .Community Development r t o Plot date:Feb 1,2005;C:Magic\MAGICO3.APR I I — — I ,_ : ---- 2 /114/1.••• l' .------ ' 9,9 kv ------.... e ---....---- ,— .--........ -------- I r lit . c. •Il 00,10,11, _17:ill—ft'..--- -----._, --,74IL----.___ / . ----1 46.,..0":,. 4 , , •.... Itio,„ i ,.- • 1 I,.. le; I , s , , • , -...... c-, 4 ------- 1 ., % ..,.-..4„k ,,,. 71 , 1;I 11 ,,74.• • - 1 • / , , , .. , , ,,, taw - , / ,, 4k, , , . , ,0 4 ; / ; . emsh , .. , I / 1.„....... I: Il t* / 1 • ".. I 7 „ ,, „ __.., .,.;. , • . , , , 0414 .• 1, / : i I A 10. ,,/ 4.. ....: / / •/ ' ■ '44tit,-_Ar4;..:. /:' / / • , o 1 ,,,/ i / &/ // - la a ..., / / 7 , I el • / /;/ / 0 I ' 0 1 0 I . / : 1 .../ i 1 ,' 11i , 5 a • • • ‘..,,, •-•.. 4) I I n /7 / i %-__-_-_-, 0...„,,,..... i • - cm.-.6c—aosotost•iiimmar:Q.,...41 ( 0 . 1, i . i 1.4% 47r3 414 .6.' *.%■01 :414 i: j i 4.-•,-1.sk-va:,.4 co,n- - 4.0v 10 1111111)44'- — i ,• I * # ....-....-...---,\N e `....,,.., • , , ' i,„,\> ; , ---, ‘1-1 o I r) \\ i 4Ch i -4-d . c ,.\\ • .„It, I / 4 / rr;1 0 3 . 17:: il' / z / , / loW , i / / . _ . , \ / ,\-7 ' / / ----------- , , , . , ,,, • ,,, ;I - 1 / ! 1 0 , , i , , ,/ • / , \ / . .. . / I. \ SHEET ppc,,c, I 8/10 DEZFULLI AUTO SALES 1 CNECKED i PROJECT °WNE9 _ANDSCA-1'F .='_A\ EBRAHIM DEZFULLI 125•7 5.v33.9 V& MAO OREGM 97223 (503)524-5433 NOTICE OF TYPE II DECISION SITE DEVELOPMENT REVIEW (SDR) 2004-00010 '�� CITY OF TIdARD CommunityrDeveCopment DEZFULLI AUTO SALES Shaping Better Community 120 DAYS = 5/31/2005 SECTION I. APPLICATION SUMMARY FILE NAME: DEZFULLI AUTO SALES CASE NO.: Site Development Review (SDR) SDR2004-00010 PROPOSAL: The applicant proposes to construct a used automobile sales lot with an associated 350 square foot sales office. OWNER: Ebrahim & Shahin Dezfulli APPLICANT: Same 12587 SW 133rd Avenue Tigard, OR 97223 LOCATION: 15280 SW Pacific Highway; WCTM 2S110DB, Tax Lot 1200. ZONE: C-G: General Commercial District. The C-G zoning district is designed to accommodate a full range of retail, office and civic uses with a Citywide and even regional trade area. Except where non-conforming, residential uses are limited to single-family residences which are located on the same site as a permitted use. A wide range of uses, including but not limited to adult entertainment, automotive equipment repair and storage, mini-warehouses, utilities, heliports, medical centers, major event entertainment, and gasoline stations, are permitted conditionally. APPLICABLE REVIEW CRITERIA: Community Development Code Chapters 18.360,. 18.390, 18.520, 18.705, 18.725, 18.745, 18.755, 18.765, 18.780, 18.790, 18.795 and 18.810. SECTION II . DECISION Notice is hereby given that the City of Tigard Community Development Director's designee has APPROVED the request for Site Development Review subject to certain conditions of approval. The findings and conclusions on which the decision is based are noted in the full decision, available at City Hall. ''?=;''.!;34i^. ', THIS APPROVAL SHALL BE VALID FOR 18 MONTHS FROM THE EFFECTIVE DATE OF THIS DECISION. All documents and applicable criteria in the above-noted file are available for inspection at no cost or copies can be obtained for twenty-five cents (250 per page, or the current rate charged for copies at the time of the request. SECTION III. PROCEDURE AND APPEAL INFORMATION Notice: Notice mailed to: X The applicant and owners X Owner of record within the required distance X Affected government agencies Final Decision: THIS DECISION IS FINAL ON MARCH 16, 2005 AND BECOMES EFFECTIVE ON MARCH 31, 2005 UNLESS AN APPEAL IS FILED. AAp e�al: The Director's Decision is final on the date that it is mailed. All persons entitled to notice or who are otherwise adversely affected or aggrieved by the decision as provided in Section 18.390.040.G.1 may appeal this decision in accordance with Section 18.390.040.G.2 of the Tigard Community Development Code which provides that a written appeal together with the required fee shall be filed with the Director within ten (10) business days of the date the Notice of Decision was mailed. The appeal fee schedule and forms are available from the Planning Division of Tigard City Hall, 13125 SW Hall Boulevard, Tigard, Oregon 97223. Unless the applicant is the appellant, the hearing on an appeal from the Director's Decision shall be confined to the specific issues identified in the written comments submitted by the parties during the comment period. Additional evidence concerning issues properly raised in the Notice of Appeal may be submitted by any party during the appeal hearing, subject to any additional rules of procedure that may be adopted from time to time by the appellate body. THE DEADLINE FOR FILING AN APPEAL IS 5:00 PM ON MARCH 30, 2005. Questions: For further information please contact the Planning Division Staff Planner, Mathew Scheidegger at 503-639-4171, Tigard City Hall, 13125 SW Hall Boulevard, Tigard, Oregon 97223. IMI VICINITY MAP .1/• I/I//,/I • B.e/ SDR2004-00010 ,:,-� an DE2FULLI AUTO SALES ,,r " e o■ 4:N.\ \so e 9 00 ` ''iiii? ir e al,,, IA a BB B BB 6). ....... A illiv • B a.)- - - 1 ; ,I • . B b A? ,... BBB BB g ,■, 1 ,,,,,,B BBBB LT N „. . .B B 6 e BBB, LL�WB'°OK.. ...„,... _ + ''..'' City of Tigard B El or . w r.....+� B B • , .4... Co nmun*y Drnbpm.nl B --T Rol d•N.1,2005,C:n4...w M.pbUTADICW.IPR i . , / !4 N / ''''. , mj /7 I/CARD COVENANT CHURCH lit f 1. 4 ,:::..p , ., / fit,„ /, Pil �1� Sw.-.AEK STgf — �_ �,� ,,r,;,;,;,..,-..ii - , 0_ -,4140•43k-s,v `•.; .�'-- nnoax. i t ^�.w �+ �' Vin / / / ' 1 NOTICE TO MORTGAGEE, LIENHOLDER,VENDOR OR SELLER: THE TIGARD DEVELOPMENT CODE REQUIRES THAT IF YOU RECEIVE THIS NOTICE,IT SHALL BE PROMPTLY FORWARDED TO THE PURCHASER, NOTICE OF PENDING LAND USE APPLICATION � ►► SITE DEVELOPMENT REVIEW '` �� CITY OF TIGARD Community Development Shaping A Better Community DATE OF NOTICE: February 2, 2005 FILE NUMBER: SITE DEVELOPMENT REVIEW (SDR) 2004-00010 Type II Land Use Application FILE NAME: DEZFULLI AUTO SALES PROPOSAL: The applicant is requesting Site Development Review approval to construct a used automobile sales lot with an associated 350 square foot sales office. ZONE: C-G: General Commercial District. The C-G zoning district is designed to accommodate a full range of retail, office and civic uses with a City-wide and even regional trade area. Except where non-conforming, residential uses are limited to single-family residences which are located on the same site as a permitted use. APPLICABLE REVIEW CRITERIA: Community Development Code Chapters 18.360, 18.390, 18.520, 18.705, 18.725, 18.745, 18.755, 18.765, 18.780, 18.790, 18.795 and 18.810. LOCATION: 15280 SW Pacific Highway; WCTM 2S110DB, Tax Lot 1200, YOUR RIGHT TO PROVIDE WRITTEN COMMENTS: Prior to the City making any decision on the Application, you are hereby provided a fourteen (14) day period to submit written comments on the application to the City. AT a ,��,,': �"• = ' , .-AMW, All comments should be directed to Mathew Scheideacter, Associate Planner in the Planning Division at the City of Tigard, 13125 SW Hall Boulevard, Tigard, Oregon 97223. You may reach the City of Tigard by telephone at (503) 639-4171 or by e-mail to matts@ci.tigard.or.us. ALL COMMENTS MUST BE RECEIVED BY THE CITY OF TIGARD IN WRITING PRIOR TO 5:00 PM ON THE DATE SPECIFIED ABOVE IN ORDER FOR YOUR COMMENTS TO BE CONSIDERED IN THE DECISION MAKING PROCESS THE CITY OF TIGARD APPRECIATES RECEIVING COMMENTS AND VALUES YOUR INPUT. COMMENTS WILL BE CONSIDERED AND ADDRESSED WITHIN THE NOTICE OF DECISION. A DECISION ON THIS ISSUE IS TENTATIVELY SCHEDULED FOR MARCH 14, 2005. IF YOU PROVIDE COMMENTS, YOU WILL BE SENT A COPY OF THE FULL DECISION ONCE IT HAS BEEN RENDERED. WRITTEN COMMENTS WILL BECOME A PART OF THE PERMANENT PUBLIC RECORD AND SHALL CONTAIN THE FOLLOWING INFORMATION: • Address the specific "Applicable Review Criteria" described in the section above or any other criteria believed to be applicable to this proposal; • Raise any issues and/or concerns believed to be important with sufficient evidence to allow the City to provide a response; • Comments that provide the basis for an appeal to the Tigard Hearings Officer must address the relevant approval criteria with sufficient specificity on that issue. Failure of any party to address the relevant approval criteria with sufficient specificity may preclude subsequent appeals to the Land Use Board of Appeals or Circuit Court on that issue. Specific findings directed at the relevant approval criteria are what constitute relevant evidence. AFTER THE 14 DAY COMMENT PERIOD CLOSES, THE DIRECTOR SHALL ISSUE A TYPE II ADMINISTRATIVE DECISION. THE DIRECTOR'S DECISION SHALL BE MAILED TO THE APPLICANT AND TO OWNERS OF RECORD OF PROPERTY LOCATED WITHIN 500 FEET OF THE SUBJECT SITE, AND TO ANYONE ELSE WHO SUBMITTED WRITTEN COMMENTS OR WHO IS OTHERWISE ENTITLED TO NOTICE. THE DIRECTOR'S DECISION SHALL ADDRESS ALL OF THE RELEVANT APPROVAL CRITERIA. BASED UPON THE CRITERIA AND THE FACTS CONTAINED WITHIN THE RECORD, THE DIRECTOR SHALL APPROVE, APPROVE WITH CONDITIONS OR DENY THE REQUESTED PERMIT OR ACTION. SUMMARY OF THE DECISION-MAKING PROCESS: • The application is accepted by the City • Notice is sent to property owners of record within 500 feet of the proposed development area allowing a 14-day written comment period. • The application is reviewed by City Staff and affected agencies. • City Staff issues a written decision. • Notice of the decision is sent to the Applicant and all owners or contract purchasers of record of the site; all owners of record of property located within 500 feet of the site, as shown on the most recent property tax assessment roll; any City-recognized neighborhood group whose boundaries include the site; and any governmental agency which is entitled to notice under an intergovernmental agreement entered into with the City which includes provision for such notice or anyone who is otherwise entitled to such notice. INFORMATION/EVIDENCE AVAILABLE FOR REVIEW: The application, written comments and supporting documents relied upon by the Director to make this decision are contained within the record and are available for public review at the City of Tigard Community Development Department. Copies of these items may be obtained at a cost of $.25 per page or the current rate charged for this service. Questions regarding this application should be directed to the Planning Staff indicated on the first page of this Notice under the section titled "Your Right to Provide Written Comments." E�p �� :.':.:.;e::..... . VICINITY MAP I rrw PP 0 8 B `;a■„ 3 SDR2004-000 1 0 DEZEULU AUTO SALES `�``. e 0210 Ali sockG■)ce SW:;.‘‘,NNNN0 ,s, IV iii., , q:\*''' la' • jjjj ■ ',ink( i ,.......... .S , e MI B a B N/0. EBBS B BB B BB s. «�W:-00K BBB=! ,� ,. -1 City of ' • ∎ is B .r.rw.+eatw..ew • e.urw.�.wSW Mal O.e.snrd B B • ,a.oema B .� .r....eti..o... Community Development Plot date:Feb 1,2005;C:vnegioIMAGICO3APR REQUEST FOR COMMENTS REQUEST FOR COMMENTS CITY OFTIOARD Community(Deveuopment Shaping (Better Community DATE: February 2,2005 TO: Barbara Shields,Long Range Planning Manager FROM: City of Tigard Planning Division STAFF CONTACT: Mathew Scheidegger,Associate Planner(x2431) Phone: (503)639-4111/Fax: (5031 684-1291 SITE DEVELOPMENT REVIEW ISDRI 2004-00010 DEZFULLI AUTO SALES< REQUEST: The applicant is requesting Site Development Review approval to construct a used automobile sales lot with an associated 350 square foot sales office. LOCATION: 15280 SW Pacific Highway; WCTM 2S110DB, Tax Lot 1200. ZONE: C-G: General Commercial District. The C-G zoning district is designed to accommodate a full range of retail, office and civic uses with a City-wide and even regional trade area. Except where non-conforming, residential uses are limited to single-family residences which are located on the same site as a permitted use. APPLICABLE REVIEW CRITERIA: Community Development Code Chapters 18.360, 18.390, 18.520, 18.705, 18.725, 18.745, 18.755, 18.765, 18.780, 18.790, 18.795 and 18.810. Attached is the Site Plan, Vicinity Map and Applicant's Materials for your review. From information supplied by various departments and agencies and from other information available to our staff, a report and recommendation will be prepared and a decision will be rendered on the proposal in the near future. If you wish to comment on this application, WE NEED YOUR COMMENTS BACK BY: FEBRUARY 16, 2005. You may use the space provided below or attach a separate letter to return your comments. If you are unable to respond by the above date, please phone the staff contact noted above with your comments and confirm your comments in writing as soon as possible. If you have any questions, contact the Tigard Planning Division, 13125 SW Hall Boulevard, Tigard, OR 97223. PLEASE CHECK THE FOLLOWING ITEMS THAT APPLY: We have reviewed the proposal and have no objections to it. _ Please contact of our office. Please refer to the enclosed letter or email. Written comments provided below: Name & Number of Person Commenting: DATE: February 7, 2005 TO: ® Richard Sattler, Water Operations Supervisor r Howard Gregory, Streets Supervisor ® Eric Hand, Wastewater Operations Supervisor 1 � FROM: Brian Rager, Engineering Manager F —, RE: REQUEST FOR COMMENTS FOR LAND USE APPLICATION Dezfulli Auto Sales SDR 2004-00010 Attached is a "Request for Comments" for the above-named project. Please route these materials between you for review. In order for me to provide a composite set of comments back to Planning by February 23, 2005, I will need to get your comments or questions back to me no later than February 16, 2005. If you would like to discuss this project in more detail, please let me know. We can meet individually or as a group. NOTE: If this one looks familiar, it should •) Ece- 5y r (pp i fv roc_ Gdvm %ow o PeaUtoE 5ntnr3 to-4 A e7 P-64- \ N GPI �� / cJ }TtS `"� ftGH ��" v 115S— PAa PAGE 1 Matt Scheidegger-proposed site develop- -ht review —17G-7 31 SP (YED4-1 From: Franklin Chave <pfchimself @juno.com> QOrD To: <matts @ci.tigard.or.us> Date: 2/7/2005 12:59:20 PM Subject: proposed site development review In answer to your Site Development Review notice of February 2, 2005, I wish to request that you turn down the application for a used automobile lot on that site. I walked by the proposed tract this past Friday and came to the conclusion that the lot size available is too small and poorly configured for that purpose, even if you cut down several large evergreen trees on (or near) the dege of that property. The plot has roughly the shape of a bow tie with the large ends in both cases being next to street intersections. One, of course, is facing the already overburdened Pacific Highway. The other intersection is that of Royalty Pkwy and Naeve St. That, too, has the potential of creating traffic problems. I also believe that an used car lot will detract from the "esthetic value" of the general area I suggest the best usage for the property would be a mini park or, possibly two private homes. More than that would be overcrowding that rather small space. Very truly yours Franklin Chave Tel. # (503) 598-6781 / S3 '7/ csu) //�-6 ; /D1 -77-crzd, S MA004-0001 d 45435-AZ6 //4L-q- 't97 Cam , G77-2-`f' 4,w ' `_`7f RECEIVED PLANNING J 31 z S A.40. 7 _z FEB 1 4 2005 CITY OF TIGARD T9 It-Ze t PL-"-f c''" ;t "t ,di c,t �G4 Ct . 14t-C. AMplarilyn A Ikatz 7� 5435 SW 114th Ct. Portland,OR 97224 s.pg z f . � po � �� Oregon Department of Transportation Or g ODOT Region 1 L`• Theodore R.Kulongcxki,Governor 123 NW Flanders St Portland,OR 97209 Telephone(503)731-8200 FAX(503)731-8259 ODOT Response to Local Land Use Notification Jurisdiction: Tigard, City of Case #: SDR2004-00010 Applicant: Dezfulli, Ebriham Project Name: Dezfulli Auto Sales Address: 15280 SW 99W Tigard, OR Legal Description: Tax Lot(s) State Highway: Pacific West 99W Mileposts: 11.07 - TRAFFIC CONTACT: Kathleen Freitag Phone: 503.731.8220 Traffic Analyst PERMIT CONTACT:Sam Hunaidi ODOT District: 2A Phone: 503.229.5002 Access Mgt & Engineering Coordinator *Please see reverse side for Recommended Local Conditions of Approval. The site is adjacent to the referenced state highway. ODOT has permitting authority for the state highway and an interest in ensuring that the proposed land use is compatible with its safe and efficient operation. Please direct the applicant to the District Contact indicated above to determine permit requirements and obtain application information. RECOMMENDED LOCAL CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL ® Curb, sidewalk and bikeways shall be constructed consistent with the local Transportation System Plan and Regional Transportation Plan (if applicable) to current local, ODOT/ADA standards to provide pedestrian and bicycle access to the site. ® Right of way dedication as necessary to accommodate the planned cross section identified in the Transportation System Plan shall be provided through deed to the Oregon Department of Transportation. An ODOT Miscellaneous Permit is required for all work in the highway right of way. An ODOT Drainage Permit is required for connection to state highway drainage facilities. Connection will only be considered if the site's drainage naturally enters ODOT right of way. The applicant must provide ODOT District with a preliminary drainage plan showing impacts to the highway right of way. A drainage study prepared by an Oregon Registered Professional Engineer is usually required by ODOT if: 1. Total peak runoff entering the highway right of way is greater than 1.77 cubic feet per second; or 2. The improvements create an increase of the impervious surface area greater than 10,758 square feet. Signed: Marah Danielson Development Review Planner Phone: 503.731.8258 Date: 2/10/2005 ODOT Log No 1294 REQUEST FOR COMMENTS CITY oFnoARD Community(Development Shaping Better Community DATE: February 2,2005 TO: Jim Wolf,Tigard Police Department Crime Prevention Officer FROM: City of Tigard Planning Division STAFF CONTACT: Mathew Scheidegger,Associate Planner[x24371 Phone: [5031639-4111/Fax: [5031 684-1291 SITE DEVELOPMENT REVIEW MDR)2004-00010 ➢ DEZFULLI AUTO SALES< REQUEST: The applicant is requesting Site Development Review approval to construct a used automobile sales lot with an associated 350 square foot sales office. LOCATION: 15280 SW Pacific Highway; WCTM 2S110DB, Tax Lot 1200. ZONE: C-G: General Commercial District. The C-G zoning district is designed to accommodate a full range of retail, office and civic uses with a City-wide and even regional trade area. Except where non-conforming, residential uses are limited to single-family residences which are located on the same site as a permitted use. APPLICABLE REVIEW CRITERIA: Community Development Code Chapters 18.360, 18.390, 18.520, 18.705, 18.725, 18.745, 18.755, 18.765, 18.780, 18.790, 18.795 and 18.810. Attached is the Site Plan, Vicinity Map and Applicant's Materials for your review. From information supplied by various departments and agencies and from other information available to our staff, a report and recommendation will be prepared and a decision will be rendered on the proposal in the near future. If you wish to comment on this application, WE NEED YOUR COMMENTS BACK BY: FEBRUARY 16, 2005. You may use the space provided below or attach a separate letter to return your comments. If you are unable to respond by the above date, please phone the staff contact noted above with your comments and confirm your comments in writing as soon as possible. If you have any questions, contact the Tigard Planning Division, 13125 SW Hall Boulevard, Tigard, OR 97223. PLEASE CHECK THE FOLLOWING ITEMS THAT APPLY: We have reviewed the proposal and have no objections to it. _ Please contact of our office. Please refer to the enclosed letter or email. Written comments provided below: ?(‘ -ko c-vuk,14w er*;48(64k\GA— floottot a deci eck ven ‘0■1‘ 'CO( `fit, aimi\orvdc. 1c, Gin lvvt of CorneoivYt. 0, b(vrnR.) c�,l wit afrm . GohS�da,n t cop¢. o f fie, P Q ‘ciu,Ark and 5.13e.Qk.b,\ki 'F''t - 41141-, .itivrn,moA.t Jest41 ale a+ l5 cc'vticak . Name & Number of Person Commenting: 6%ix \OcAf X 25b REQUEST FOR COMMENTS CITY TIGARD Community Development Shaping Better Community DATE: February 2,2005 TO: Matt Stine,Urban Forester/Puhlic Works Annex FROM: Cijof Tigard Planning Division STAFF CONTACT: Mathew Scheidegger,Associate Planner(x2437) Phone: (503)639-4171/Fax: [5031684-7297 SITE DEVELOPMENT REVIEW ISDR]2004-00010 DEEFULLI AUTO SALES< REQUEST: The applicant is requesting Site Development Review approval to construct a used automobile sales lot with an associated 350 square foot sales office. LOCATION: 15280 SW Pacific Highway; WCTM 2S110DB, Tax Lot 1200. ZONE: C-G: General Commercial District. The C-G zoning district is designed to accommodate a full range of retail, office and civic uses with a City-wide and even regional trade area. Except where non-conforming, residential uses are limited to single-family residences which are located on the same site as a permitted use. APPLICABLE REVIEW CRITERIA: Community Development Code Chapters 18.360, 18.390, 18.520, 18.705, 18.725, 18.745, 18.755, 18.765, 18.780, 18.790, 18.795 and 18.810. Attached is the Site Plan, Vicinity Map and Applicant's Materials for your review. From information supplied by various departments and agencies and from other information available to our staff, a report and recommendation will be prepared and a decision will be rendered on the proposal in the near future. If you wish to comment on this application, WE NEED YOUR COMMENTS BACK BY: FEBRUARY 16, 2005. You may use the space provided below or attach a separate letter to return your comments. If you are unable to respond by the above date, please phone the staff contact noted above with your comments and confirm your comments in writing as soon as possible. If you have any questions, contact the Tigard Planning Division, 13125 SW Hall Boulevard, Tigard, OR 97223. PLEASE CHECK THE FOLLOWING ITEMS THAT APPLY: We have reviewed the proposal and have no objections to it. _ Please contact of our office. Please refer to the enclosed letter or email. Written comments provided below: Name & Number of Person Commenting: Matt Scheidegger- Dezfulli Auto Sales 2.d-^ Page 1 i - • 114914R TUALATIN VALLEY FIRE & RESCUE • SOUTH DIVISION COMMUNITY SERVICES • OPERATIONS • FIRE PREVENTION Tualatin Valley Fire & Rescue February 17, 2005 Mathew Scheidegger,Associate Planner City of Tigard 13125 SW Hall Blvd Tigard, OR 97223 Re: Dezfulli Auto Sales Dear Mathew, Thank you for the opportunity to review the proposed site plan surrounding the above named development project. Tualatin Valley Fire& Rescue endorses this proposal predicated on the following criteria and conditions of approval: 1) SURFACE AND LOAD CAPACITIES: Fire apparatus access roads shall be of an all-weather surface that is easily distinguishable from the surrounding area and is capable of supporting not less than 12,500 pounds point load (wheel load) and 75,000 pounds live load (gross vehicle weight). You may need to provide documentation from a registered engineer that the design will be capable of supporting such loading. 2) TURNING RADIUS: The inside turning radius and outside turning radius shall be not less than 28 feet and 48 feet respectively, measured from the same center point. 3) PAINTED CURBS: Where required, fire apparatus access roadway curbs shall be painted red and marked"NO PARKING FIRE LANE" at approved intervals. Lettering shall have a stroke of not less than one inch wide by six inches high. Lettering shall be white on red background. 4) COMMERCIAL BUILDINGS - REQUIRED FIRE FLOW: The required fire flow for the building shall not exceed 3,000 gallons per minute (GPM) or the available GPM in the water delivery system at 20 psi,whichever is less as calculated using IFC, Appendix B. A worksheet for calculating the required fire flow is available from the Fire Marshal's Office. 5) FIRE HYDRANTS—COMMERCIAL BUILDINGS: Where a portion of the building is more than 400 feet from a hydrant on a fire apparatus access road, as measured in an approved route around the exterior of the building, on-site fire hydrants and mains shall be provided. This distance may be increased to 600 feet for buildings equipped throughout with an approved automatic sprinkler system. 6) FIRE HYDRANT NUMBER AND DISTRIBUTION: The minimum number and distribution of fire hydrants available to a building shall not be less than that listed in Appendix C,Table C 105.1. Considerations for placing fire hydrants may be as follows: • Existing hydrants in the area may be used to meet the required number of hydrants as approved. Hydrants that are up to 600 feet away from the nearest point of a subject building that is protected with fire sprinklers may contribute to the required number of hydrants. • Hydrants that are separated from the subject building by railroad tracks shall not contribute to the required number of hydrants unless approved by the fire code official. • Hydrants that are separated from the subject building by divided highways or freeways shall not contribute to the required number of hydrants. Heavily traveled collector streets only as approved by the fire code official. • Hydrants that are accessible only by a bridge shall be acceptable to contribute to the required number of hydrants only if approved by the fire code official. 7401 SW Washo Court,Suite 101 •Tualatin,Oregon 97062•Tel.(503)612-7000•Fax(503)612-7003•www.tvfr.com Matt Sch d gger- Dezfulli Auto Sales 2.dnr. Page 21 7) FIRE HYDRANT DISTANCE FROM AN ACCESS ROAD: Fire hydrants shall be located not more than 15 feet from an approved fire apparatus access roadway. 8) REFLECTIVE HYDRANT MARKERS: Fire hydrant locations shall be identified by the installation of reflective markers. The markers shall be blue. They shall be located adjacent and to the side of the centerline of the access road way that the fire hydrant is located on. In case that there is no center line, then assume a centerline, and place the reflectors accordingly 9) ACCESS AND FIRE FIGHTING WATER SUPPLY DURING CONSTRUCTION: Approved fire apparatus access roadways and fire fighting water supplies shall be installed and operational prior to any combustible construction or storage of combustible materials on the site. Please contact me at(503)612-7010 with any additional questions. Sincerely, Eric T. McMullen Eric T. McMullen Deputy Fire Marshal Page 2 of 2 MEMORANDUM CITY OF TIGARD, OREGON DATE: 2/14/05 TO: Matt Scheidegger, Associate Planner FROM: Kim McMillan, Development Review Engineer )V\ RE: SDR2004-00010 Dezfulli Auto Access Management (Section 18.705.030.H) Section 18.705.030.H.1 states that an access report shall be submitted with all new development proposals which verifies design of driveways and streets are safe by meeting adequate stacking needs, sight distance and deceleration standards as set by ODOT, Washington County, the City and AASHTO. The applicant's engineer has submitted preliminary sight distance certification for the proposed driveways on Naeve Street and Royalty Parkway. There is more than the required 250 feet of sight distance in all directions except eastbound on Naeve Street, but because of reduced turning speed the sight distance of 170 feet is adequate. Section 18.705.030.H.2 states that driveways shall not be permitted to be placed in the influence area of collector or arterial street intersections. Influence area of intersections is that area where queues of traffic commonly form on approach to an intersection. The minimum driveway setback from a collector or arterial street intersection shall be150 feet, measured from the right-of-way line of the intersecting street to the throat of the proposed driveway. The setback may be greater depending upon the influence area, as determined from City Engineer review of a traffic impact report submitted by the applicant's traffic engineer. In a case where a project has less than 150 feet of street frontage, the applicant must explore any option for shared access with the adjacent parcel. If shared access is not possible or practical, the driveway shall be placed as far from the intersection as possible. The driveway on Naeve Street has been placed 150 feet from the ROW of Highway 99, an Arterial, thereby meeting this criterion. Section 18.705.030.H.3 and 4 states that the minimum spacing of driveways and streets along a collector shall be 200 feet. The minimum spacing of driveways and streets along an arterial shall be 600 feet. The minimum spacing of local streets along a local street shall be 125 feet. ENGINEERING COMMENTS SDR2004-00010 DEZFULLI AUTO PAGE 1 There are no driveways proposed along the Highway 99 frontage. Highway 99 is classified as an Arterial, while Naeve Street and Royalty Parkway are classified as Neighborhood Routes. This criterion is met. Street And Utility Improvements Standards (Section 18.810): Chapter 18.810 provides construction standards for the implementation of public and private facilities and utilities such as streets, sewers, and drainage. The applicable standards are addressed below: Streets: Improvements: Section 18.810.030.A.1 states that streets within a development and streets adjacent shall be improved in accordance with the TDC standards. Section 18.810.030.A.2 states that any new street or additional street width planned as a portion of an existing street shall be dedicated and improved in accordance with the TDC. Minimum Rights-of-Way and Street Widths: Section 18.810.030.E requires a 5-lane Arterial Street to have a 104 foot right-of-way width and 72-foot paved section. Other improvements required may include on-street parking, sidewalks and bikeways, underground utilities, street lighting, storm drainage, and street trees. This site lies adjacent to SW Pacific Highway, which is classified as a 5-lane Arterial on the City of Tigard Transportation Plan Map. At present, there is approximately 125 feet of ROW total, according to the most recent tax assessor's map. The applicant should dedicate ROW at the radius for the intersection of Naeve Street and Pacific Highway. SW Pacific Highway is currently partially improved. In order to mitigate the impact from this development, the applicant should construct a 10-foot sidewalk at the ultimate location with a 5-foot planter strip, plant ODOT approved street trees and taper the sidewalk at the south end of their frontage back to the Nursery access and provide an ADA ramp. Section 18.810.030.E requires Neighborhood Routes to have a 54 foot right- of-way width and 32-foot paved section. Other improvements required may include on-street parking, sidewalks and bikeways, underground utilities, street lighting, storm drainage, and street trees. ENGINEERING COMMENTS SDR2004-00010 DEZFULLI AUTO PAGE 2 This site lies adjacent to SW Naeve Street and Royalty Parkway, which are both classified as Neighborhood Routes on the City of Tigard Transportation Plan Map. At present, there is approximately 20 feet of ROW from centerline along the Naeve Street frontage, according to the most recent tax assessor's map. The applicant should dedicate the additional ROW to provide 27 feet from centerline and the radius at both intersections. There is 60 feet of ROW for Royalty Parkway. No additional ROW is required. SW Naeve Street is currently partially improved. In order to mitigate the impact from this development, the applicant should construct half-street improvements to the Neighborhood Route standard. SW Royalty Parkway is currently partially improved. In order to mitigate the impact from this development, the applicant should construct a 5-foot curb tight sidewalk along this frontage and plant street trees in accordance with the TDC. Future Street Plan and Extension of Streets: Section 18.810.030.F states that a future street plan shall be filed which shows the pattern of existing and proposed future streets from the boundaries of the proposed land division. This section also states that where it is necessary to give access or permit a satisfactory future division of adjoining land, streets shall be extended to the boundary lines of the tract to be developed and a barricade shall be constructed at the end of the street. These street stubs to adjoining properties are not considered to be cul-de-sacs since they are intended to continue as through streets at such time as the adjoining property is developed. A barricade shall be constructed at the end of the street by the property owners which shall not be removed until authorized by the City Engineer, the cost of which shall be included in the street construction cost. Temporary hammerhead turnouts or temporary cul-de-sac bulbs shall be constructed for stub streets in excess of 150 feet in length. No future streets are proposed. There are streets along 3 frontages and no opportunity to provide another street extension. Street Alignment and Connections: Section 18.810.030.H.1 states that full street connections with spacing of no more than 530 feet between connections is required except where prevented by barriers such as topography, railroads, freeways, pre-existing developments, lease provisions, easements, covenants or other restrictions existing prior to May 1, 1995 which preclude street connections. A full street connection may also be exempted due to a regulated water feature if regulations would not permit construction. ENGINEERING COMMENTS SDR2004-00010 DEZFULLI AUTO PAGE 3 Section 18.810.030.H.2 states that all local, neighborhood routes and collector streets which abut a development site shall be extended within the site to provide through circulation when not precluded by environmental or topographical constraints, existing development patterns or strict adherence to other standards in this code. A street connection or extension is precluded when it is not possible to redesign, or reconfigure the street pattern to provide required extensions. Land is considered topographically constrained if the slope is greater than 15% for a distance of 250 feet or more. In the case of environmental or topographical constraints, the mere presence of a constraint is not sufficient to show that a street connection is not possible. The applicant must show why the constraint precludes some reasonable street connection. There are no opportunities or advantages to providing another street connection or extension through this development. Grades and Curves: Section 18.810.030.N states that grades shall not exceed ten percent on arterials, 12% on collector streets, or 12% on any other street (except that local or residential access streets may have segments with grades up to 15% for distances of no greater than 250 feet). Centerline radii of curves shall be as determined by the City Engineer. The street grades for all three streets are significantly lower than 12% and meet this criterion. Access to Arterials and Major Collectors: Section 18.810.030.Q states that where a development abuts or is traversed by an existing or proposed arterial or major collector street, the development design shall provide adequate protection for residential properties and shall separate residential access and through traffic, or if separation is not feasible, the design shall minimize the traffic conflicts. The design shall include any of the following: • A parallel access street along the arterial or major collector; • Lots of suitable depth abutting the arterial or major collector to provide adequate buffering with frontage along another street; • Screen planting at the rear or side property line to be contained in a non-access reservation along the arterial or major collector; or • Other treatment suitable to meet the objectives of this subsection; • If a lot has access to two streets with different classifications, primary access should be from the lower classification street. The applicant has not proposed to access directly to Pacific Highway. Rather, access will be provided onto both of the other lower classification streets. Block Designs - Section 18.810.040.A states that the length, width and shape of blocks shall be designed with due regard to providing adequate building ENGINEERING COMMENTS SDR2004-00010 DEZFULLI AUTO PAGE 4 sites for the use contemplated, consideration of needs for convenient access, circulation, control and safety of street traffic and recognition of limitations and opportunities of topography. Block Sizes: Section 18.810.040.B.1 states that the perimeter of blocks formed by streets shall not exceed 1,800 feet measured along the right-of- way line except: • Where street location is precluded by natural topography, wetlands or other bodies of water or, pre-existing development or; • For blocks adjacent to arterial streets, limited access highways, major collectors or railroads. • For non-residential blocks in which internal public circulation provides equivalent access. PLANNING Section 18.810.040.B.2 also states that bicycle and pedestrian connections on public easements or right-of-ways shall be provided when full street connection is not possible. Spacing between connections shall be no more than 330 feet, except where precluded by environmental or topographical constraints, existing development patterns, or strict adherence to other standards in the code. PLANNING Lots - Size and Shape: Section 18.810.060(A) prohibits lot depth from being more than 2.5 times the average lot width, unless the parcel is less than 1.5 times the minimum lot size of the applicable zoning district. PLANNING Lot Frontage: Section 18.810.060(B) requires that lots have at least 25 feet of frontage on public or private streets, other than an alley. In the case of a land partition, 18.420.050.A.4.c applies, which requires a parcel to either have a minimum 15-foot frontage or a minimum 15-foot wide recorded access easement. In cases where the lot is for an attached single-family dwelling unit, the frontage shall be at least 15 feet. PLANNING Sidewalks: Section 18.810.070.A requires that sidewalks be constructed to meet City design standards and be located on both sides of arterial, collector and local residential streets. Private streets and industrial streets shall have sidewalks on at least one side. The applicant's plans indicate they will construct sidewalk along all three frontages as part of their half-street improvements, thereby meeting this criterion. ENGINEERING COMMENTS SDR2004-00010 DEZFULLI AUTO PAGE 5 Sanitary Sewers: Sewers Required: Section 18.810.090.A requires that sanitary sewer be installed to serve each new development and to connect developments to existing mains in accordance with the provisions set forth in Design and Construction Standards for Sanitary and Surface Water Management (as adopted by Clean Water Services in 1996 and including any future revisions or amendments) and the adopted policies of the comprehensive plan. Over-sizing: Section 18.810.090.0 states that proposed sewer systems shall include consideration of additional development within the area as projected by the Comprehensive Plan. The applicant's plans indicate they will provide a lateral to the proposed building from the public sewer located in Royalty Parkway. Storm Drainage: General Provisions: Section 18.810.100.A requires developers to make adequate provisions for storm water and flood water runoff. Accommodation of Upstream Drainage: Section 18.810.100.0 states that a culvert or other drainage facility shall be large enough to accommodate potential runoff from its entire upstream drainage area, whether inside or outside the development. The City Engineer shall approve the necessary size of the facility, based on the provisions of Design and Construction Standards for Sanitary and Surface Water Management (as adopted by Clean Water Services in 2000 and including any future revisions or amendments). There are no impacts from upstream drainage. Effect on Downstream Drainage: Section 18.810.100.D states that where it is anticipated by the City Engineer that the additional runoff resulting from the development will overload an existing drainage facility, the Director and Engineer shall withhold approval of the development until provisions have been made for improvement of the potential condition or until provisions have been made for storage of additional runoff caused by the development in accordance with the Design and Construction Standards for Sanitary and Surface Water Management (as adopted by Clean Water Services in 2000 and including any future revisions or amendments). ENGINEERING COMMENTS SDR2004-00010 DEZFULLI AUTO PAGE 6 In 1997, Clean Water Services (CWS) completed a basin study of Fanno Creek and adopted the Fanno Creek Watershed Management Plan. Section V of that plan includes a recommendation that local governments institute a stormwater detention/effective impervious area reduction program resulting in no net increase in storm peak flows up to the 25-year event. The City will require that all new developments resulting in an increase of impervious surfaces provide onsite detention facilities, unless the development is located adjacent to Fanno Creek. For those developments adjacent to Fanno Creek, the storm water runoff will be permitted to discharge without detention. The applicant shows stormwater being directed to both the system in Pacific Highway and in Royalty Parkway. The detention calculations only cover the portion directed to Pacific Highway. The engineer shall submit detention calculations with the PFI for the portion directed to Royalty Parkway. The applicant must have ODOT review and approve the detention calculations for the stormwater directed to Pacific Highway. All work within Pacific Highway will require an ODOT facility permit. Bikeways and Pedestrian Pathways: Bikeway Extension: Section 18.810.110.A states that developments adjoining proposed bikeways identified on the City's adopted pedestrian/bikeway plan shall include provisions for the future extension of such bikeways through the dedication of easements or right-of-way. Pacific Highway has an existing bicycle lane, therefore this criterion is met. Utilities: Section 18.810.120 states that all utility lines, but not limited to those required for electric, communication, lighting and cable television services and related facilities shall be placed underground, except for surface mounted transformers, surface mounted connection boxes and meter cabinets which may be placed above ground, temporary utility service facilities during construction, high capacity electric lines operating at 50,000 volts or above, and: • The developer shall make all necessary arrangements with the serving utility to provide the underground services; • The City reserves the right to approve location of all surface mounted facilities; • All underground utilities, including sanitary sewers and storm drains installed in streets by the developer, shall be constructed prior to the surfacing of the streets; and ENGINEERING COMMENTS SDR2004-00010 DEZFULLI AUTO PAGE 7 • Stubs for service connections shall be long enough to avoid disturbing the street improvements when service connections are made. Exception to Under-Grounding Requirement: Section 18.810.120.0 states that a developer shall pay a fee in-lieu of under-grounding costs when the development is proposed to take place on a street where existing utilities which are not underground will serve the development and the approval authority determines that the cost and technical difficulty of under- grounding the utilities outweighs the benefit of under-grounding in conjunction with the development. The determination shall be on a case- by-case basis. The most common, but not the only, such situation is a short frontage development for which under-grounding would result in the placement of additional poles, rather than the removal of above-ground utilities facilities. An applicant for a development which is served by utilities which are not underground and which are located across a public right-of-way from the applicant's property shall pay a fee in-lieu of under- grounding. There are existing overhead utility lines along the frontage of SW Naeve Street. If the fee in-lieu is proposed, it is equal to $ 35.00 per lineal foot of street frontage that contains the overhead lines. The frontage along this site is 430 lineal feet; therefore the fee would be $ 15,050. If the site it served with power from Naeve Street then there is no required fee. ADDITIONAL CITY AND/OR AGENCY CONCERNS WITH STREET AND UTILITY IMPROVEMENT STANDARDS: Public Water System: The City of Tigard provides service in this area. There is an existing water line in Naeve Street and the applicant shows a service off of this line. Storm Water Quality: The City has agreed to enforce Surface Water Management (SWM) regulations established by Clean Water Services (CWS) Design and Construction Standards (adopted by Resolution and Order No. 00-7) which require the construction of on-site water quality facilities. The facilities shall be designed to remove 65 percent of the phosphorus contained in 100 percent of the storm water runoff generated from newly created impervious surfaces. In addition, a maintenance plan shall be submitted indicating the frequency and method to be used in keeping the facility maintained through the year. ENGINEERING COMMENTS SDR2004-00010 DEZFULLI AUTO PAGE 8 Prior to construction, the applicant shall submit plans and calculations for a water quality facility that will meet the intent of the CWS Design Standards. In addition, the applicant shall submit a maintenance plan for the facility that must be reviewed and approved by the City prior to construction. ODOT will have to approve the water quality calculations for the portion of the site runoff directed to Pacific Highway. The City will have to review and approve the water quality calculations for the portion of the site runoff directed to Royalty Parkway. To ensure compliance with Clean Water Services design and construction standards, the applicant shall employ the design engineer responsible for the design and specifications of the private water quality facility to perform construction and visual observation of the water quality facility for compliance with the design and specifications. These inspections shall be made at significant stages throughout the project and at completion of the construction. Prior to final building inspection, the design engineer shall provide the City of Tigard (Inspection Supervisor) with written confirmation that the water quality facility is in compliance with the design and specifications. Grading and Erosion Control: CWS Design and Construction Standards also regulate erosion control to reduce the amount of sediment and other pollutants reaching the public storm and surface water system resulting from development, construction, grading, excavating, clearing, and any other activity which accelerates erosion. Per CWS regulations, the applicant is required to submit an erosion control plan for City review and approval prior to issuance of City permits. The Federal Clean Water Act requires that a National Pollutant Discharge Elimination System (NPDES) erosion control permit be issued for any development that will disturb one or more acre of land. Since this site is over five acres, the developer will be required to obtain an NPDES permit from the City prior to construction. This permit will be issued along with the site and/or building permit. Site Permit Required: The applicant is required to obtain a Site Permit from the Building Division to cover all on-site private utility installations (water, sewer, storm, etc.) and driveway construction. This permit shall be obtained prior to approval of the final plat. ENGINEERING COMMENTS SDR2004-00010 DEZFULLI AUTO PAGE 9 Address Assignments: The City of Tigard is responsible for assigning addresses for parcels within the City of Tigard and within the Urban Service Boundary (USB). An addressing fee in the amount of $ 50.00 per address shall be assessed. This fee shall be paid to the City prior to issuance of building permits. Recommendations: THE FOLLOWING CONDITIONS SHALL BE SATISFIED PRIOR TO ISSUANCE OF THE SITE PERMIT: Submit to the Engineering Department (Kim McMillan, 639-4171, ext. 2642) for review and approval: Prior to issuance of a site permit, a Public Facility Improvement (PFI) permit is required for this project to cover half-street and any other work in the public right-of-way. Six (6) sets of detailed public improvement plans shall be submitted for review to the Engineering Department. NOTE: these plans are in addition to any drawings required by the Building Division and should only include sheets relevant to public improvements. Public Facility Improvement (PFI) permit plans shall conform to City of Tigard Public Improvement Design Standards, which are available at City Hall and the City's web page (www.ci.tigard.or.us). The PFI permit plan submittal shall include the exact legal name, address and telephone number of the individual or corporate entity who will be designated as the "Permittee", and who will provide the financial assurance for the public improvements. For example, specify if the entity is a corporation, limited partnership, LLC, etc. Also specify the state within which the entity is incorporated and provide the name of the corporate contact person. Failure to provide accurate information to the Engineering Department will delay processing of project documents. The applicant shall provide a construction vehicle access and parking plan for approval by the City Engineer. The purpose of this plan is for parking and traffic control during the public improvement construction phase. All construction vehicle parking shall be provided on-site. No construction vehicles or equipment will be permitted to park on the adjoining residential public streets. Construction vehicles include the vehicles of any contractor or subcontractor involved in the construction of site improvements or ENGINEERING COMMENTS SDR2004-00010 DEZFULLI AUTO PAGE 10 buildings proposed by this application, and shall include the vehicles of all suppliers and employees associated with the project. The applicant shall submit construction plans to the Engineering Department as a part of the Public Facility Improvement permit, which indicate that they will construct a half-street improvement along the frontage of Naeve Street. The improvements adjacent to this site shall include: A. City standard pavement section for a local street from curb to centerline equal to 16 feet; B. pavement tapers needed to tie the new improvement back into the existing edge of pavement shall be built beyond the site frontage; C. concrete curb, or curb and gutter as needed; D. storm drainage, including any off-site storm drainage necessary to convey surface and/or subsurface runoff; E. 5 foot concrete sidewalk with a 5-foot planter strip; F. street trees in the planter strip spaced per TDC requirements; G. street striping; H. streetlight layout by applicant's engineer, to be approved by City Engineer; underground utilities; J. street signs (if applicable); K. driveway apron (if applicable); and L. adjustments in vertical and/or horizontal alignment to construct SW Naeve Street in a safe manner, as approved by the Engineering Department. The applicant shall submit construction plans to the Engineering Department as a part of the Public Facility Improvement permit, indicating that they will construct the following frontage improvements along SW Royalty Parkway as a part of this project: A. 5-foot concrete sidewalk with 5-foot planter strip; B. street trees in the planter strip spaced per TDC requirements; C. streetlight layout by applicant's engineer, to be approved by City Engineer; and D. driveway apron (if applicable). The applicant shall submit construction plans to ODOT and the City Engineering Department as a part of the Public Facility Improvement permit, indicating that they will construct the following frontage improvements along SW Pacific Highway as a part of this project: A. 10-foot concrete sidewalk with 5-foot planter strip; B. street trees in the planter strip spaced per ODOT requirements; C. sidewalk taper and ADA ramp at south end of frontage improvements; and D. ADA ramp at the corner of Pacific Highway and Naeve Street. ENGINEERING COMMENTS SDR2004-00010 DEZFULLI AUTO PAGE 11 Prior to issuance of the site permit, the applicant shall obtain a permit from the State of Oregon Highway Division, to perform work within the right-of- way of Pacific Highway. A copy of the permit shall be provided to the City Engineering Department. No direct access will be allowed to Pacific Highway. Prior to issuance of the site permit the applicant shall provide the City with ODOT approval of the stormwater detention and water quality system that will discharge to Pacific Highway. Any extension of public water lines shall be shown on the proposed Public Facility Improvement (PFI) permit construction drawings and shall be reviewed and approved by the City's Water Department, as a part of the Engineering Department plan review. NOTE: An estimated 12% of the water system costs must be on deposit with the Water Department prior to approval of the PFI permit plans from the Engineering Department and construction of public water lines. Final design plans and calculations for the proposed private water quality facility discharging to Royalty Parkway shall be submitted to the Engineering Department (Kim McMillan) as a part of the Public Facility Improvement (PFI) permit plans. Included with the plans shall be a proposed landscape plan and maintenance plan. An erosion control plan shall be provided as part of the Public Facility Improvement (PFI) permit drawings. The plan shall conform to the "Erosion Prevention and Sediment Control Design and Planning Manual, February 2003 edition." THE FOLLOWING CONDITIONS SHALL BE SATISFIED PRIOR TO ISSUANCE OF THE BUILDING PERMIT: Submit to the Engineering Department (Kim McMillan, 639-4171, ext. 2642) for review and approval: Prior to issuance of building permits, the applicant shall pay the addressing fee. (STAFF CONTACT: Shirley Treat, Engineering). Additional right-of-way shall be dedicated to the Public along the frontage of Naeve Street to increase the right-of-way to 27 feet from the centerline. The description shall be tied to the existing right-of-way centerline. The ENGINEERING COMMENTS SDR2004-00010 DEZFULLI AUTO PAGE 12 dedication document shall be on City forms. Instructions are available from the Engineering Department. THE FOLLOWING CONDITIONS SHALL BE SATISFIED PRIOR TO A FINAL BUILDING INSPECTION: Submit to the Engineering Department (Kim McMillan, 639-4171, ext. 2642) for review and approval: Prior to a final building inspection, the applicant shall complete the required public improvements, obtain conditional acceptance from the City, and provide a one-year maintenance assurance for said improvements. Prior to final building inspection, the applicant shall provide the City with as- built drawings of the public improvements as follows: 1) 3 mil mylar, 2) a diskette of the as-builts in "DWG" format, if available; otherwise "DXF" will be acceptable, and 3) the as-built drawings shall be tied to the City's GPS network. The applicant's engineer shall provide the City with an electronic file with points for each structure (manholes, catch basins, water valves, hydrants and other water system features) in the development, and their respective X and Y State Plane Coordinates, referenced to NAD 83 (91). The applicant shall either place the existing overhead utility lines along SW Naeve Street underground as a part of this project, or they shall pay the fee in-lieu of undergrounding. The fee shall be calculated by the frontage of the site that is parallel to the utility lines and will be $ 35.00 per lineal foot. If the fee option is chosen, the amount will be $ 15,050.00 and it shall be paid prior to final building inspection. If the applicant will be provided power off of their Royalty Parkway or Pacific Highway Frontage this fee will not apply. To ensure compliance with Clean Water Services design and construction standards, the applicant shall employ the design engineer responsible for the design and specifications of the private water quality facility to perform construction and visual observation of the water quality facility for compliance with the design and specifications. These inspections shall be made at significant stages, and at completion of the construction. Prior to final building inspection, the design engineer shall provide the City of Tigard (Inspection Supervisor) with written confirmation that the water quality facility is in compliance with the design and specifications. Staff Contact: Hap Watkins, Building Division. ENGINEERING COMMENTS SDR2004-00010 DEZFULLI AUTO PAGE 13 ENGINEERING COMMENTS SDR2004-00010 DEZFULLI AUTO PAGE 14 Matt Scheidegger-SDR 2004-00010 De-',11i Auto Sales Page 1 From: "Liden, Keith S." <Liden @pbworld.com> To: <Matts @ci.tigard.or.us> Date: 2/7/2005 1:37:54 PM Subject: SDR 2004-00010 Dezfulli Auto Sales Matt, I am the King City Planner, and the Tigard notice of the above application was passed to me from the City Manager, Jane Turner. The City of King City has no objections to the proposed automobile sales business. Thanks. Keith S. Liden, AICP Lead Planner 400 SW 6th Avenue, Suite 802 Portland, OR 97204 Phone: 503.274.8772 Direct: 503.478.2348 Fax: 503.274.1412 liden @pbworld.com This e-mail and any attachments may be confidential or legally privileged. If you received this message in error or are not the intended recipient, you should destroy the e-mail message and inform us of the erroneous delivery by return e-mail. Thank you for your cooperation. Matt Scheideg.er-SCAR 2004-00010 Deg Ili Auto Sales Page 2 1 CC: <jturner @ci.king-city.or.us> • REQUEST FOR COMMENTS CITY OFTIGARD Community,Development ShapingA Better Community DATE: February 2,2005 TO: Val Henze!,Commercial Plans Examiner FROM: City of Tigard Planning Division STAFF CONTACT: Mathew Scheidegger,Associate Planner(x24311 Phone: (5031639-4171/Fax: 1503)684-1297 SITE DEVELOPMENT REVIEW(SDR]2004-00010 DEZFULLI AUTO SALES< REQUEST: The applicant is requesting Site Development Review approval to construct a used automobile sales lot with an associated 350 square foot sales office. LOCATION: 15280 SW Pacific Highway; WCTM 2S110DB, Tax Lot 1200. ZONE: C-G: General Commercial District. The C-G zoning district is designed to accommodate a full range of retail, office and civic uses with a City-wide and even regional trade area. Except where non-conforming, residential uses are limited to single-family residences which are located on the same site as a permitted use. APPLICABLE REVIEW CRITERIA: Community Development Code Chapters 18.360, 18.390, 18.520, 18.705, 18.725, 18.745, 18.755, 18.765, 18.780, 18.790, 18.795 and 18.810. Attached is the Site Plan, Vicinity Map and Applicant's Materials for your review. From information supplied by various departments and agencies and from other information available to our staff, a report and recommendation will be prepared and a decision will be rendered on the proposal in the near future. If you wish to comment on this application, WE NEED YOUR COMMENTS BACK BY: FEBRUARY 16, 2005. You may use the space provided below or attach a separate letter to return your comments. If you are unable to respond by the above date, please phone the staff contact noted above with your comments and confirm your comments in writing as soon as possible. If you have any questions, contact the Tigard Planning Division, 13125 SW Hall Boulevard, Tigard, OR 97223. PLEASE CHECK THE FOLLOWING ITEMS THAT APPLY: We have reviewed the proposal and have no objections to it. _ Please contact of our office. Please refer to the enclosed letter or email. Written ments provided below: a S (V �' c1f Sc clerk 1 �.. � � \to cv"._o 045v9 )740 0,21 fAiLc (1 r r 4,2 ki c . 76(4. if Name & Number of Person Commenting: REQUEST FOR COMMENTS CITY OFTIGARD Community(Development Shaping A(Better Community DATE: February 2,2005 TO: PER ATTACHED FROM: City of Tigard Planning Division STAFF CONTACT: Mathew Scheidegger,Associate Planner(x2437) Phone: (503)639-4111/Fax: (503)684-7291 SITE DEVELOPMENT REVIEW MDR)2004-00010 ➢ !REFUEL! AUTO SALES< REQUEST: The applicant is requesting Site Development Review approval to construct a used automobile sales lot with an associated 350 square foot sales office. LOCATION: 15280 SW Pacific Highway; WCTM 2S110DB, Tax Lot 1200. ZONE: C-G: General Commercial District. The C-G zoning district is designed to accommodate a full range of retail, office and civic uses with a City-wide and even regional trade area. Except where non-conforming, residential uses are limited to single-family residences which are located on the same site as a permitted use. APPLICABLE REVIEW CRITERIA: Community Development Code Chapters 18.360, 18.390, 18.520, 18.705, 18.725, 18.745, 18.755, 18.765, 18.780, 18.790, 18.795 and 18.810. Attached is the Site Plan, Vicinity Map and Applicant's Materials for your review. From information supplied by various departments and agencies and from other information available to our staff, a report and recommendation will be prepared and a decision will be rendered on the proposal in the near future. If you wish to comment on this application, WE NEED YOUR COMMENTS BACK BY: FEBRUARY 16, 2005. You may use the space provided below or attach a separate letter to return your comments. If you are unable to respond by the above date, please phone the staff contact noted above with your comments and confirm your comments in writing as soon as possible. If you have any questions, contact the Tigard Planning Division, 13125 SW Hall Boulevard, Tigard, OR 97223. PLEASE CHECK THE FOLLOWING ITEMS THAT APPLY: We have reviewed the proposal and have no objections to it. Please contact of our office. Please refer to the enclosed letter or email. Written comments provided below: Name & Number of Person Commenting: .TY OF TIGARD REQUEST FO. ,OMMENTS NOTIFICATION LIST FOR LAND USE & COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT APPLICATIONS FILE NOS.: S17 ? 6 /fl FILE NAME: CITIIEN INVOLVEMENT TEAMS 14-DAY PENDING APPLICATION NOTICE TO INTERESTED PARTIES OF AREA: ❑Central ❑East [South ❑West CITY OFFICES I LANG RANGE PLANNING/Barbara Shields,Planning Mgr. COMMUNITY DVLPMNT.DEPT./Planning-Engineering Techs. POLICE DEPT./Jim Wolf,Crime Prevention Officer ✓BUILDING DIVISION/Gary Lampella,Building Official ±/ENGINEERING DEPT./Kim McMillan,Dvlpmnt.Review Engineer_PUBLIC WORKS/Matt Stine,Urban Forester _CITY ADMINISTRATION/Cathy Wheatley,City Recorder _✓PUBLIC WORKS/Brian Rager,Engineering Manager PLANNER—POST PROJECT SITE IF A PUBLIC HEARING ITEM-10 BUSINESS DAYS PRIOR TO THE PUBLIC HEARING! SPECIAL DISTRICTS _ TUAL.HILLS PARK&REC.DIST.*:/(TUALATIN VALLEY FIRE&RESCUE* ✓ TUALATIN VALLEY WATER DISTRICT* _ CLEANWATER SERVICES* Planning Manager Fire Marshall Administrative Office Lee Walker/SWM Program 15707 SW Walker Road Washington County Fire District PO Box 745 155 N.First Avenue Beaverton,OR 97006 (place in pick-up box) Beaverton,OR 97075 Hillsboro,OR 97124 LOCAL AND STATE JURISDICTIONS CITY OF BEAVERTON * _ CITY OF TUALATIN * _OR.DEPT.OF FISH&WILDLIFE _OR.DIV.OF STATE LANDS — Planning Manager Planning Manager 3406 Cherry Avenue NE Melinda Wood(WLUN Form Required) _ Steven Sparks,Dev Svcs.Manager 18880 SW Martinazzi Avenue Salem,OR 97303 775 Summer Street NE,Suite 100 PO Box 4755 Tualatin,OR 97062 Salem,OR 97301-1279 Beaverton,OR 97076 OR.PUB.UTILITIES COMM. METRO-LAND USE&PLANNING * _OR.DEPT.OF GEO.&MINERAL IND. 550 Capitol Street NE _ CITY OF DURHAM * 600 NE Grand Avenue 800 NE Oregon Street,Suite 5 Salem,OR 97310-1380 City Manager Portland,OR 97232-2736 Portland,OR 97232 PO Box 23483 _ Bob Knight,Data Resource Center(ZCA) US ARMY CORPS.OF ENG. Durham,OR 97281-3483 _ Paulette Allen,Growth Management Coordinator _OR.DEPT.OF LAND CONSERV.&DVLP_Kathryn Harris _ Mel Huie,Greenspaces Coordinator(cPAizoA) Larry French(comp Plan Amendments Only) Routing CENWP-OP-G ITY OF KING CITY _ Jennifer Budhabhatti,Regonal Planner(wetlands) 635 Capitol Street NE,Suite 150 PO Box 2946 City Manager _ C.D.Manager,Growth Management Services Salem,OR 97301-2540 Portland,OR 97208-2946 15300 SW 116th Avenue King City,OR 97224 WASHINGTON COUNTY _ OR.DEPT.OF ENERGY Ipowervoes in Area) _OR.DEPT OF AVIATION(Monopole Towers) Dept.of Land Use&Transp. Bonneville Power Administration Tom Highland,Planning 155 N. First Avenue _CITY OF LAKE OSWEGO * Routing TTRC-Attn: Renae Ferrera 3040 25th Street,SE Suite 350,MS 13 Planning Director PO Box 3621 Salem,OR 97310 Hillsboro,OR 97124 PO Box 369 Portland,OR 97208-3621 _Steve Conway(General Apps) Lake Oswego,OR 97034 _Gregg Leion(cPA) _ OR.DEPT.OF ENVIRON.QUALITY(DEQ) "DOT,REGION 1 * _Brent Curtis(cpA) _CITY OF PORTLAND (Notify for Wetlands and Potential Environmental Impacts) r"Marah Danielson,Development Review Coordinator _Doria Mateja(ZCA)MS 14 Planning Bureau Director Regional Administrator _Carl Torland, Right-of-Way Section(vacations) _Sr.Cartographer(cPoZcA)MS14 1900 SW 4th Avenue,Suite 4100 2020 SW Fourth Avenue,Suite 400 123 NW Flanders _Jim Nims,surveyor(zcA)MS is Portland,OR 97201 Portland,OR 97201-4987 Portland,OR 97209-4037 _WA.CO.CONSOL.COMM.AGNCY _ODOT,REGION 1 -DISTRICT 2A* _ODOT,RAIL DIVISION _STATE HISTORIC Dave Austin(wcccA)"911"imnncy*To.•.r.i Sam Hunaidi,Assistant Dlstnct Manager (Notify if ODOT R/R•Hwy.Crossing is Only Access to Land) PRESERVATION OFFICE PO Box 6375 5440 SW Westgate Drive,Suite 350 Dave Lanning,Sr Crossing Safety Specialist (Notify if Property Has HD Overlay) Beaverton,OR 97007-0375 Portland,OR 97221-2414 555-13th Street,NE,Suite 3 1115 Commercial Street, NE Salem,OR 97301-4179 Salem,OR 97301-1012 UTILITY PROVIDERS AND SPECIAL AGENCIES _PORTLAND WESTERN RJR,BURLINGTON NORTHERN/SANTA FE R/R,OREGON ELECTRIC R/R(Burlington Northern/Santa Fe RJR Predecessor) Robert I. Melbo,President&General Manager 110 W. 10th Avenue Albany,OR 97321 _SOUTHERN PACIFIC TRANS.CO.RJR _METRO AREA COMMUNICATIONS _COMCAST CABLE CORP,, kTRI-MET TRANSIT DVLPMT. Clifford C.Cabe,Construction Engineer Debra Palmer(Annexations Only) Randy Bice is..Mee rw Area ) / (if Prot is Within Z Mile of a Transit Route) 5424 SE McLoughlin Boulevard Twin Oaks Technology Center 14200 SW Brigadoon Cou Ben aldwin,Project Planner Portland,OR 97232 1815 NW 169th Place,S-6020 Beaverton,OR 97005 71 NE Holladay Street yeaverton,OR 97006-4886 / ortland,OR 97232 ZORTLAND +'GENERAL ELECTRIC NW NATURAL GAS COMPANY •✓VERIZON _QWEST COMMUNICATIONS Ken Gutierrez,Svc.Design Consultant Scott Palmer,Engineering Coord. Ken Perdue,Engineering Florence Mott,Eng.ROW Mgr. 9480 SW Boeckman Road 220 NW Second Avenue PO Box 1100 8021 SW Capitol Hill Rd,Rm 110 Wilsonville,OR 97070 Portland,OR 97209-3991 Beaverton,OR 97075-1100 Portland,OR 97219 _TIGARD/TUALATIN SCHOOL DIST.#23J_BEAVERTON SCHOOL DIST.#48 _COMCAST CABLE CORP. _COMCAST CABLE COMMUNIC. Marsha Butler,Administrative Offices Jan Youngquist,Demographics Alex Silantiev(sa M.,roa..c.,.., Diana Carpenter,Am.E ovaANwsn)A, 6960 SW Sandburg Street 16550 SW Merlo Road 9605 SW Nimbus Avenue,Bldg. 12 10831 SW Cascade Avenue Tigard,OR 97223-8039 Beaverton,OR 97006-5152 Beaverton,OR 97008 Tigard,OR 97223-4203 * INDICATES AUTOMATIC NOTIFICATION IN COMPLIANCE WITH INTERGOVERNMENTAL AGREEMENT IF WITHIN 500'OF THE SUBJECT PROPERTY FOR ANY/ALL CITY PROJECTS (Project Planner Is Responsible For Indicating Parties To Notify). h:\patty\rnasters\Request For Comments Notification L st.doc (UPDATED: 15-Nov-04) (Also update:iicurpin\setup\labels\anneoation_utiiities and franchises.doc when updating this document) MAILING RECORDS AFFIDAVIT OF MAILING CITY OF TIOARD Community Development Shaping Better Community I, Patricia L. Lunsford, being first duly sworn/affirm, on oath depose and say that I am a Senior Administrative Specialist for the City of Tigard;Washington County, Oregon and that I served the following: {Check Appropriate Box(sl Below} © NOTICE OF DECISION FOR: SDR2004-00010/DEIFULLI AUTO SALES CI AMENDED NOTICE (File No/Name Reference) ® City of Tigard Planning Director A copy of the said notice being hereto attached, marked Exhibit"A", and by reference made a part hereof, was mailed to each named person(s) at the address(s) shown on the attached list(s), marked Exhibit"B", and by reference made a part hereof, on March 16,2005, and deposited in the United States Mail on March 16,2005, postage prepaid. (Person-tat Prepared Notice) STATE OE pkE GON ) County of Washington )ss. City of Tigard ) fir, Subscribed and sworn/affirmed before me on the /v day of , 2005. OFFICIALSEAL L % 7rcir SUE ROSS �'��.� NOTARY PUBLIC-OREGON MY COMMISSION COMMISSION EXPIRES 7 , NOTARY OS IC OF OREGON My Commi sion Expires: a✓/-0 7 EXHIBIT A NOTICE OF TYPE II DECISION SITE DEVELOPMENT REVIEW (SDR) 2004-00010 � �►_ CITY OF TIGARD DEZFULLI AUTO SALES Community,Devekipment Sltaping,4 c13etter Community 120 DAYS = 5/31/2005 SECTION I. APPLICATION SUMMARY FILE NAME: DEZFULLI AUTO SALES CASE NO.: Site Development Review (SDR) SDR2004-00010 PROPOSAL: The applicant proposes to construct a used automobile sales lot with an associated 350 square foot sales office. OWNER: Ebrahim & Shahin Dezfulli APPLICANT: Same 12587 SW 133rd Avenue Tigard, OR 97223 LOCATION: 15280 SW Pacific Highway; WCTM 2S110DB, Tax Lot 1200. ZONE: C-G: General Commercial District. The C-G zoning district is designed to accommodate a full range of retail, office and civic uses with a Citywide and even regional trade area. Non-conforming, residential uses are limited to single-family residences which are located on the same site as a permitted use. A wide range of uses, including but not limited to adult entertainment, automotive equipment repair and storage, mini-warehouses, utilities, heliports, medical centers, major event entertainment, and gasoline stations, are permitted conditionally. APPLICABLE REVIEW CRITERIA: Community Development Code Chapters 18.360, 18.390, 18.520, 18.705, 18.725, 18.745, 18.755, 18.765, 18.780, 18.790, 18.795 and 18.810. SECTION II. DECISION Notice is hereby given that the City of Tigard Community Development Director's designee has APPROVED the above request subject to certain conditions of approval. The findings and conclusions on which the decision is based are noted in Section VI. NOTICE OF TYPE II DECISION SDR2004-00010/DEZFULLI AUTO SALES PAGE 1 OF 28 CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL THE FOLLOWING CONDITIONS SHALL BE SATISFIED PRIOR TO THE ISSUANCE OF SITE/BUILDING PERMITS: Submit evidence of complying with the following conditions to the Planning Division. Staff contact: Mathew Scheidegger. 1. Provide a sign-off letter from the franchise hauler regarding the refuse facility compatibility. 2. Submit a plan showing 24-foot-wide access isles in order to accommodate two- direction traffic. All drive isles must be maintained free of parked cars. 3. Submit a plan showing the bicycle parking structure to include no less than 2-bicycle parking stalls. 4. Provide a plan that shows the bicycle rack designed according to Section 18.765.050.C. of the Tigard Development Code. 5. Provide a new tree removal/protection/mitigation plan that correlates with the project arborists report. The required plan must be accompanied with a letter from the project arborist that acknowledges his or her review and approval. Any variation from the resubmitted plan will require an additional Type II review. 6. The applicant shall submit a final Tree Protection Plan that shows exactly how far the tree protection fencing will be from the face of each protected tree (including those on neighboring properties where construction occurs within the trees' driplines) that will be impacted by construction activities within its dripline. The applicant, through their Project Arborist, shall justify the close proximity of the construction activities to the trees. He shall certify that the activities will not adversely impact the overall and long- term health and stability of each tree. Any construction that occurs within the neighboring trees' driplines should be justified by the applicant and approved by the City Forester and neighboring property owner(s). Work may proceed within the driplines only with the approval of the City Forester. 7. Submit a plan showing parking lot lighting and an elevation of the proposed sales office that shows windows and point of access. THE FOLLOWING CONDITIONS SHALL BE SATISFIED PRIOR TO ISSUANCE OF THE SITE PERMIT: Submit to the Engineering Department (Kim McMillan, 639-4171, ext. 2642) for review and approval: 8. Prior to issuance of a site permit, a Public Facility Improvement (PFI) permit is required for this project to cover half-street and any other work in the public right-of-way. Six (6) sets of detailed public improvement plans shall be submitted for review to the Engineering Department. NOTE: these plans are in addition to any drawings required by the Building Division and should only include sheets relevant to public improvements. Public Facility Improvement (PFI) permit plans shall conform to City of Tigard Public Improvement Design Standards, which are available at City Hall and the City's web page (www.ci.tigard.or.us). 9. The PFI permit plan submittal shall include the exact legal name, address and telephone number of the individual or corporate entity who will be designated as the "Permittee", and who will provide the financial assurance for the public improvements. For example, specify if the entity is a corporation, limited partnership, LLC, etc. Also specify the state within which the entity is incorporated and provide the name of the corporate contact person. Failure to provide accurate information to the Engineering Department will delay processing of project documents. NOTICE OF TYPE II DECISION SDR2004-00010/DEZFULLI AUTO SALES PAGE 2 OF 28 10. The applicant shall provide a construction vehicle access and parking plan for approval by the City Engineer. The purpose of this plan is for parking and traffic control during the public improvement construction phase. All construction vehicle parking shall be provided on-site. No construction vehicles or equipment will be permitted to park on the adjoining residential or commercial public streets. Construction vehicles include the vehicles of any contractor or subcontractor involved in the construction of site improvements or buildings proposed by this application, and shall include the vehicles of all suppliers and employees associated with the project. 11. The applicant shall submit construction plans to the Engineering Department as a part of the Public Facility Improvement permit, which indicate that they will construct a half-street improvement along the frontage of Naeve Street. The improvements adjacent to this site shall include: A. City standard pavement section for a local street from curb to centerline equal to 16 feet; B. pavement tapers needed to tie the new improvement back into the existing edge of pavement shall be built beyond the site frontage; C. concrete curb, or curb and gutter as needed; D. storm drainage, including any off-site storm drainage necessary to convey surface and/or subsurface runoff; E. 5 foot concrete sidewalk with a 5-foot planter strip; F. street trees in the planter strip spaced per TDC requirements; G. street striping; H. streetlight layout by applicant's engineer, to be approved by City Engineer; underground utilities; J. street signs (if applicable); K. driveway apron (if applicable); and L. adjustments in vertical and/or horizontal alignment to construct SW Naeve Street in a safe manner, as approved by the Engineering Department. 12. The applicant shall submit construction plans to the Engineering Department as a part of the Public Facility Improvement permit, indicating that they will construct the following frontage improvements along SW Royalty Parkway as a part of this project: A. 5-foot concrete sidewalk with 5-foot planter strip; B. street trees in the planter strip spaced per TDC requirements; C. streetlight layout by applicant's engineer, to be approved by City Engineer; and D. driveway apron (if applicable). 13. The applicant shall submit construction plans to ODOT and the City Engineering Department as a part of the Public Facility Improvement permit, indicating that they will construct the following frontage improvements along SW Pacific Highway as a part of this project: A. 10-foot concrete sidewalk with 5-foot planter strip; B. street trees in the planter strip spaced per ODOT requirements; C. sidewalk taper and ADA ramp at south end of frontage improvements; and D. ADA ramp at the corner of Pacific Highway and Naeve Street. 13. Prior to issuance of the site permit, the applicant shall obtain a permit from the State of Oregon Highway Division, to perform work within the right-of-way of Pacific Highway. A copy of the permit shall be provided to the City Engineering Department. 14. No direct access will be allowed to Pacific Highway. 15. Prior to issuance of the site permit the applicant shall provide the City with ODOT approval of the stormwater detention and water quality system that will discharge to Pacific Highway. NOTICE OF TYPE II DECISION SDR2004-00010/DEZFULLI AUTO SALES PAGE 3 OF 28 16. Any extension of public water lines shall be shown on the proposed Public Facility Improvement (PFI) permit construction drawings and shall be reviewed and approved by the City's Water Department, as a part of the Engineering Department plan review. NOTE: An estimated 12% of the water system costs must be on deposit with the Water Department prior to approval of the PFI permit plans from the Engineering Department and construction of public water lines. 17. Final design plans and calculations for the proposed private water quality facility discharging to Royalty Parkway shall be submitted to the Engineering Department (Kim McMillan) as a part of the Public Facility Improvement (PFI) permit plans. Included with the plans shall be a proposed landscape plan and maintenance plan. 18. An erosion control plan shall be provided as part of the Public Facility Improvement (PFI) permit drawings. The plan shall conform to the "Erosion Prevention and Sediment Control Design and Planning Manual, February 2003 edition." THE FOLLOWING CONDITIONS SHALL BE SATISFIED PRIOR TO ISSUANCE OF THE BUILDING PERMIT: Submit evidence of complying with the following conditions to the Planning Division. Staff contact: Mathew Scheidegger. 19. The Project Arborist shall submit written reports to the City Forester, at least, once every two weeks, as he monitors the construction activities and progress. These reports should include any changes that occurred to the TPZ as well as the condition and location of the tree protection fencing. If the amount of TPZ was reduced then the Project Arborist shall justify why the fencing was moved, and shall certify that the construction activities to the trees did not adversely impact the overall and long-term health and stability of the tree(s). If the reports are not submitted or received by the City Forester at the scheduled intervals, and if it appears the TPZ's or the Tree Protection Plan is not being followed by the contractor, the City can stop work on the project until an inspection can be done by the City Forester and the Project Arborist. This inspection will be to evaluate the tree protection fencing, determine if the fencing was moved at any point during construction, and determine if any part of the Tree Protection Plan has been violated. 20. Prior to issuance of building permits the Project Arborist shall submit to the City Forester a final report describing how the Tree Protection Plan was implemented and detailing any failures to comply with the Tree Protection Plan. The report shall also describe the health of all remaining trees on the site, with details provided as to any tree that has had its root system disturbed or that has otherwise been damaged. Submit to the Engineering Department (Kim McMillan, 639-4171, ext. 2642) for review and approval: 21. Prior to issuance of building permits, the applicant shall pay the addressing fee. (STAFF CONTACT: Shirley Treat, Engineering). 22. Additional right-of-way shall be dedicated to the Public along the frontage of Naeve Street to increase the right-of-way to 27 feet from the centerline. The description shall be tied to the existing right-of-way centerline. The dedication document shall be on City forms. Instructions are available from the Engineering Department. THE FOLLOWING CONDITIONS SHALL BE SATISFIED PRIOR TO A FINAL BUILDING INSPECTION: _ Submit to the Engineering Department im c�fi1lai, M9-4171-, ext. 2642) for review and approval: 23. Prior to a final building inspection, the applicant shall complete the required public improvements, obtain conditional acceptance from the City, and provide a one-year maintenance assurance for said improvements. NOTICE OF TYPE II DECISION SDR2004-00010/DEZFULLI AUTO SALES PAGE 4 OF 28 24. Prior to final building inspection, the applicant shall provide the City with as-built drawings of the public improvements as follows: 1) 3 mil mylar, 2) a diskette of the as-builts in "DWG' format, if available; otherwise "DXF" will be acceptable, and 3) the as-built drawings shall be tied to the City's GPS network. The applicant's engineer shall provide the City with an electronic file with points for each structure (manholes, catch basins, water valves, hydrants and other water system features) in the development, and their respective X and Y State Plane Coordinates, referenced to NAD 83 (91). 25. The applicant shall either place the existing overhead utility lines along SW Naeve Street underground as a part of this project, or they shall pay the fee in-lieu of undergrounding. The fee shall be calculated by the frontage of the site that is parallel to the utility lines and will be $35.00 per lineal foot. If the fee option is chosen, the amount will be $15,050.00 and it shall be paid prior to final building inspection. If the applicant will be provided power off of their Royalty Parkway or Pacific Highway Frontage this fee will not apply. 26. To ensure compliance with Clean Water Services design and construction standards, the applicant shall employ the design engineer responsible for the design and specifications of the private water quality facility to perform construction and visual observation of the water quality facility for compliance with the design and specifications. These inspections shall be made at significant stages, and at completion of the construction. Prior to final building inspection, the design engineer shall provide the City of Tigard (Inspection Supervisor) with written confirmation that the water quality facility is in compliance with the desgn and specifications. Staff Contact: Hap Watkins, Building Division. THIS APPROVAL SHALL BE VALID FOR EIGHTEEN (18) MONTHS FROM THE EFFECTIVE DATE OF THIS DECISION. SECTION III. BACKGROUND INFORMATION Site History: Staff conducted a search of city records for the Tax Lot (2S110DB, Tax Lot 1200). Based on this search, two (2) previous cases were found to be associated with the property. CPA91- 00002 was an approval to change the designation of SW Naeve Street from a minor collector to a local street. The second case, SDR2001-00011, was the original approval for the used car lot with the associated sales office, which expired prior to the applicant meeting his conditions of approval. Vicinity Information: The subject site is located on the east side of SW Pacific Highway. The site is bordered on the south by property zoned General Commercial (C-G) and is separated from the property to the north by SW Naeve Street. The property to the north is zoned R-25 and developed with a church. Site Information and Proposal Description: The applicant proposes to construct a used automobile sales lot with an associated 350 square foot sales office. SECTION IV. COMMENTS FROM PROPERTY OWNERS WITHIN 500 FEET Two letters from a neighbor were submitted which address the following concerns in bold: Due to the amount of traffic in the area, the addition of a used car lot is an open invitation to accidents. NOTICE OF TYPE II DECISION SDR2004-00010/DEZFULLI AUTO SALES PAGE 5 OF 28 Staff Response: Used car lots are allowed outright in the C-G zoning district. Because of the close proximity to Highway 99, ODOT was notified and they did not require a traffic study. It is expected that Dezfulli Auto will have a maximum of 5 employees on site at any given time. Therefore, the number of Vehicle Trips per day would range between 106 and 193 if this was a new car lot. Used car lots should actually generate less traffic. This is far below the requirements for a Traffic Impact Study. The Existing ADT is 127 for the City Street, Naeve Street, based on a 1997 study. With this low ADT the development would have to generate 2000 Vehicle Trips per day before a study would be required. The proposed access drives are outside of the influence areas of the adjacent intersections and there is no direct access to Highway 99. A used car lot will detract from the "esthetic value" of the general area. I suggest the best usage for the property would be a mini park or, possibly two private homes. More than that would be overcrowding that rather small space. Used car lots are an allowed use within the C-G zoning district. The City of Tigard cannot dictate the use of property if the applicant meets the existing law. The City does not own the property and single-family homes are not permitted in the C-G zoning district. SECTION V. SUMMARY OF APPLICABLE REVIEW CRITERIA A. Zoning Districts 18.520 (Commercial Zoning Districts) B. Applicable Development Code Standards 18.705 Access Egress and Circulation) 18.725 Environmental Performance Standards) 18.745 Landscaping and Screening) 18.755 Mixed Solid Waste and Recyclable Storage) 18.765 Off-Street parking and loading requirements) 18.780 Signs) 18.790 Tree Removal) 18.795 Visual Clearance) C. Specific DR Approval Criteria 18.360 D. Street and Utility Improvement Standards 18.810 E. Impact Study 18.390 SECTION VI. APPLICABLE DEVELOPMENT CODE STANDARDS A. ZONIING DISTRICT Commercial Zoning District: Section 18.520.020 Lists the description of the Commercial Zoning Districts. The site is located in the C-G: General Commercial District. Development Standards: Section 18.520.040.B States that Development standards in commercial zoning districts are contained in Table 18.520.2 below: (SEE TABLE ON THE FOLLOWING PAGE) NOTICE OF TYPE II DECISION SDR2004-00010/DEZFULLI AUTO SALES PAGE 6 OF 28 TABLE 18.520.2 DEVELOPMENT STANDARDS IN COMMERCIAL ZONES STANDARD C-G Proposed Minimum Lot Size None 33,285 sq ft Detached unit - -Boarding,lodging, rooming house - Minimum Lot Width 50 ft 420 ft Setbacks -Front yard 0 ft[6] 72 ft. -Side facing street on corner&through lots[1] - - -Side yard 130 ft. -Side or rear yard abutting more restrictive zoning district 0/20 ft[3] - -Rear yard - 5 ft. -Distance between front of garage&property line abutting a public or private street. - 0/20 ft[3] Maximum Height 45 ft Not shown Maximum Site Coverage[2] 85% 85% Minimum Landscape Requirement 15% 15% As demonstrated in the table above, the applicant's plans comply with the dimensional standards of the C-G zone. The proposed sales office will require building permits which height will be reviewed for compliance at that time. FINDING: Based on the analysis above, the Development Standards criteria have been satisfied. B. APPLICABLE DEVELOPMENT CODE STANDARDS The Site development Review approval standards require that a development proposal be found to be consistent with the various standards of the Community Development Code. The applicable criteria in this case are Chapters 18.360, 18.390, 18.520, 18.705, 18.745, 18.755, 18.765, 18.775, 18.780, 18.790, 18.795, and 18.810. The proposal's consistency with these Code Chapters is reviewed in the following sections. Access, Egress and Circulation (18.705): Access plan: No building or other permit shall be issued until scaled plans are presented and approved as provided by this chapter that show how access, egress and circulation requirements are to be fulfilled. The applicant shall submit a site plan. The Director shall provide the applicant with detailed information about this submission requirement. The applicant has provided plans showing access, egress and circulation from SW Naeve Street and SW Royalty Parkway. Therefore, this standard has been satisfied. Joint access: Owners of two or more uses, structures, or parcels of land may agree to utilize jointly the same access and egress when the combined access and egress of both uses, structures, or parcels of land satisfies the combined requirements as designated in this title, provided: Satisfactory legal evidence shall be presented in the form of deeds, easements, leases or contracts to establish the joint use; and copies of the deeds, easements, leases or contracts are placed on permanent file with the City. No joint access is proposed at this time. Therefore, this standard does not apply. Public street access: All vehicular access and egress as required in Sections 18.705.030H and 18.705.0301 shall connect directly with a public or private street approved by the City for public use and shall be maintained at the required standards on a continuous basis. NOTICE OF TYPE II DECISION SDR2004-00010/DEZFULLI AUTO SALES PAGE 7 OF 28 The proposed building is accessible from SW Naeve and SW Royalty Parkway, both of which are public streets that will be maintained as a public street. Curb cuts: Curb cuts shall be in accordance with Section 18.810.030N: Concrete curbs, curb cuts, wheelchair, bicycle ramps and driveway approaches shall be constructed in accordance with standards specified in this chapter and Section 15.04.080: Concrete curbs and driveway approaches are required; except where no sidewalk is planned, an asphalt approach may be constructed with City Engineer approval and Asphalt and concrete driveway approaches to the property line shall be built to City configuration standards. No driveway approach shall be less than five feet from the side property line projected except in cul-de-sacs, without approval and written permission of the city. The end slopes may encroach within the five foot restricted area. No portion of any driveway approach, including the end slopes, shall be located closer than thirty feet to an intersection street right-of-way line. Commercial or service drives shall not be more than thirty feet in width and if located on the same lot frontage shall be separated by a minimum length of curb of thirty feet. Each residential driveway shall be not more than twenty-six feet in width including end slopes, and if more than one driveway is to be constructed to serve the same lot, the frontage spacing between such driveways shall be not less than thirty feet measured along the curb line. Joint access driveways shall conform to the appropriate width standard for commercial or residential type usage. Curb cuts will be addressed under Chapter 18.810 Street and Utility Improvement Standards. Therefore, this standard has been satisfied. Walkways: On-site pedestrian walkways shall comply with the following standards: Walkways shall extend from the ground floor entrances or from the ground floor landing of stairs, ramps, or elevators of all commercial, institutional, and industrial uses, to the streets which provide the required access and egress. Walkways shall provide convenient connections between buildings in multi-building commercial, institutional, and industrial complexes. Unless impractical, walkways shall be constructed between new and existing developments and neighboring developments; According to the plans submitted, a concrete walkway extends from the main entrance of the proposed sales office to the northern property line and will connect to the proposed sidewalk of SW Naeve Street. Wherever required walkways cross vehicle access driveways or parking lots, such crossings shall be designed and located for pedestrian safety . Required walkways shall be physically separated from motor vehicle traffic and parking by either a minimum 6-inch vertical separation (curbed) or a minimum 3-foot horizontal separation, except that pedestrian crossings of traffic aisles are permitted for distances no greater than 36 feet if appropriate landscaping, pavement markings, or contrasting pavement materials are used. Walkways shall be a minimum of four feet in width, exclusive of vehicle overhangs and obstructions such as mailboxes, benches, bicycle racks, and sign posts, and shall be in compliance with ADA standards; The proposed walkway crosses a traffic aisle for a distance of 27 feet. Therefore, this standard has been met. Required walkways shall be paved with hard surfaced materials such as concrete, asphalt, stone, brick, etc. Walkways may be required to be lighted and/or signed as needed for safety purposes. Soft-surfaced public use pathways may be provided only if such pathways are provided in addition to required pathways. The plan depicts that the proposed walkway that connects the sales office to the public right-of-way will be concrete, which meets the standard. NOTICE OF TYPE II DECISION SDR2004-00010/DEZFULLI AUTO SALES PAGE 8 OF 28 Access Management (Section 18.705.030.H) Section 18.765.030.H.1 states that an access report shall be submitted with all new development proposals which verifies design of driveways and streets are safe by meeting adequate stacking needs, sight distance and deceleration standards as set by ODOT, Washington County, the City and AASHTO. The applicant's engineer has submitted preliminary sight distance certification for the proposed driveways on Naeve Street and Royalty Parkway. There is more than the required 250 feet of sight distance in all directions except eastbound on Naeve Street, but because of reduced turning speed the sight distance of 170 feet is adequate. The reduced speed required to turn onto Naeve safely means that a car cannot be traveling at 25 mph and therefore a reduced sight distance is acceptable. Customers exiting the subject site can see to the intersection from the driveway, which is the greatest extent needed to see the east bound vehicle and additionally the cars are not traveling at the allowable posted speed. Section 18.705.030.H.2 states that driveways shall not be permitted to be placed in the influence area of collector or arterial street intersections. Influence area of intersections is that area where queues of traffic commonly form on approach to an intersection. The minimum driveway setback from a collector or arterial street intersection shall be150 feet, measured from the right-of-way line of the intersecting street to the throat of the proposed driveway. The setback may be greater depending upon the influence area, as determined from City Engineer review of a traffic impact report submitted by the applicant's traffic engineer. In a case where a project has less than 150 feet of street frontage, the applicant must explore any option for shared access with the adjacent parcel. If shared access is not possible or practical, the driveway shall be placed as far from the intersection as possible. The driveway on Naeve Street has been placed 150 feet from the ROW of Highway 99, an Arterial, thereby meeting this criterion. Section 18.705.030.H.3 and 4 states that the minimum spacing of driveways and streets along a collector shall be 200 feet. The minimum spacing of driveways and streets along an arterial shall be 600 feet. The minimum spacing of local streets along a local street shall be 125 feet. There are no driveways proposed along the Highway 99 frontage. Highway 99 is classified as an Arterial, while Naeve Street and Royalty Parkway are classified as Neighborhood Routes. There is no minimum driveway spacing standard along local streets, which include neighborhood streets. Therefore, this criterion is met. Minimum Access Requirements for Commercial and Industrial Use: Section 18.705.030.1 rovides the minimum access requirements for commercial and industrial uses: Table 18.705.3 indicates that the required access width for developments with 0-99 parking spaces is one 30-foot accesses with 24 feet of pavement. Vehicular access shall be provided to commercial or industrial uses, and shall be located to within 50 feet of the primary ground floor entrances; additional requirements for truck traffic may be placed as conditions of site development review. The development has two (2) points of access into the parking lot. The first is a 30-foot wide access with 30 feet of pavement from SW Royalty Parkway. The second access, from SW Naeve Street is 24 feet in width with 24 feet of pavement. Therefore, this standard has been satisfied. One-way vehicular access points: Where a proposed parking facility indicates only one-way traffic flow on the site, it shall be accommodated by a specific driveway serving the facility; the entrance drive shall be situated closest to oncoming traffic and the exit drive shall be situated farthest from oncoming traffic. The entrance drives are designed for two-way traffic. Therefore, this standard does not apply. NOTICE OF TYPE II DECISION SDR2004-00010/DEZFULLI AUTO SALES PAGE 9 OF 28 The Director has the authority to restrict access when the need to do so is dictated by one or more of the following conditions: To provide for increased traffic movement on congested streets and to eliminate turning movement problems, the Director may restrict the location of driveways on streets and require the location of driveways be placed on adjacent streets, upon the finding that the proposed access would: • Cause or increase existing hazardous traffic conditions; or • Provide inadequate access for emergency vehicles; or • Cause hazardous conditions to exist which would constitute a clear and present danger to the public health, safety, and general welfare. To eliminate the need to use public streets for movements between commercial or industrial properties, parking areas shall be designed to connect with parking areas on adjacent properties unless not feasible. The Director shall require access easements between properties where necessary to provide for parking area connections; To facilitate pedestrian and bicycle traffic, access and parking area plans shall provide efficient sidewalk and/or pathway connections, as feasible, between neighboring developments or land uses; The proposed access points to the subject property are not considered hazardous or constitute a clear and present danger to the public health based on compliance with the spacing criteria of the Access Management Standards addressed above. The proposed access drive on SW Naeve is approximately 150 feet from the intersection of SW Naeve and Pacific Highway. The second access point on SW Royalty Parkway is approximately 150 feet from the intersection of SW Royalty Parkway and SW Naeve Street. Therefore, no access restriction is required. FINDING: Based on the analysis above, the Access, Egress and Circulation standards have been met. ENVIRONMENTAL PERFORMANCE STANDARDS (18.725): Noise: For the purposes of noise regulation, the provisions of Sections 7.40.130 through 7.40.210 of the Tigard Municipal Code shall apply. Visible emissions: Within the commercial zoning districts and the industrial park (IP) zoning district, there shall be no use, operation or activity which results in a stack of other oint- source emission from space heating, or the emission of pure uncombined water (steam) which is visible from a property line. Department of Environmental Quality (DEQ) rules for visible emissions (340-21-015 and 340-28-070) apply. Vibration: No vibration other than that caused by highway vehicles, trains and aircraft is permitted in any given zoning district which is discernible without instruments at the property line of the use concerned. Odors: The emission of odorous gases or other matter in such quantities as to be readily detectable at any point beyond the property line of the use creating the odors is prohibited. DEQ rules for odors (340-028-090) apply. Glare and heat: No direct or sky-reflected glare, whether from floodlights or from high temperature processes such as combustion or welding, which is visible at the lot line shall be permitted and; there shall be no emission or transmission of heat or heated air which is discernible at the lot line of the source; and these regulations shall not apply to signs or floodlights in parking areas or constructing equipment at the time of construction or excavation work otherwise permitted by this title. NOTICE OF TYPE II DECISION SDR2004-00010/DEZFULLI AUTO SALES PAGE 10 OF 28 Insects and rodents: All materials including wastes shall be stored and all grounds shall be maintained in a manner which will not attract or aid the propagation of insects or rodents or create a health hazard. The proposed use is used auto sales, which is an outright permitted use within the C-G zoning district. There is no indication within the application that these standards will not be met. However, ongoing efforts to meet these standards shall be maintained and any violation of these standards will be addressed by the City of Tigard's Code Enforcement Officer. FINDING: Based on the above, there is no evidence the Environmental Performance Standards will not be met. Landscaping and Screening (18.745): Street Trees: Section 18.745.040 states that all development projects fronting on a public street or a private drive more than 100 feet in length shall be required to plant street trees in accordance with Section 18.745.040.0 Section 18.745.040.0 requires that street trees be spaced between 20 and 40 feet apart depending on the size classification of the tree at maturity (small, medium or large). The applicant's site plan shows three (3) Karpick Maples along SW Pacific Highway, thirteen (13) Karpick Maples along SW Naeve Street and five (5) along SW Royalty Parkway. According to Section 18.745.040.C, street trees that are medium-sized cannot be spaced greater than 30 feet apart. The proposed street trees are spaced 30 feet apart. This criterion has been satisfied. Buffering and Screening: Section 18.745.080 states that no buffer is required between abutting uses that are of a different type when the uses are separated by a street. No buffer is required between a proposed office use and existing office use. The only property abutting the subject site is the nursery to the south, which is also, zoned C-G General Commercial. Public streets separate properties to the north, east and west. According to Table 18.745.1 (Buffer Matrix) no buffer is required between parking lots and existing uses within the C-G zone. However, the applicant is proposing a 5-foot buffer between the subject property and the property to the south with Japanese Garden Junipers planted within the buffer. This standard has been satisfied. Screening: Special Provisions: Section 18.745.050.E requires the screening of parking and loading areas. Landscaped parking areas shall include special design features which effectively screen the parking lot areas from view. Planting materials to be installed should achieve a relative balance between low lying and vertical shrubbery and trees. Trees shall be planted in landscaped islands in all parking areas, and shall be equally distributed on the basis of one (1) tree for each seven (7) parking spaces in order to provide a canopy effect. The minimum dimension on the landscape islands shall be three (3) feet wide and the landscaping shall be protected from vehicular damage by some form of wheel guard or curb. The applicant is proposing to screen the parking lot with a minimum of a 5-foot landscaped area surrounding the entire property. Parking lot trees have been shown to be planted within landscaped islands on a basis of one (1) for every 7 spaces in order to provide a canopy effect. Therefore, this standard has been satisfied. NOTICE OF TYPE II DECISION SDR2004-00010/DEZFULLI AUTO SALES PAGE 11 OF 28 Screening Of Service Facilities. Except for one-family and two-family dwellings, any refuse container or disposal area and service facilities such as gas meters and air conditioners which would otherwise be visible from a public street, customer or resident parking area, any public facility or any residential area shall be screened from view by placement of a solid wood fence or masonry wall between five and eight feet in height. All refuse materials shall be contained within the screened area; Screening of Service Facilities is addressed under Chapter 18.755 (Mixed Solid Waste and Recyclable Storage). FINDING: Based on the analysis above, the landscaping and screening standards have been met. Mixed Solid Waste and Recyclables Storage (18.755): Chapter 18.755 requires that new construction incorporates functional and adequate space for on-site storage and efficient collection of mixed solid waste and source separated Recyclables prior to pick-up and removal by haulers. The applicant must choose one (1) of the following four (4) methods to demonstrate compliance: Minimum Standard, Waste Assessment, Comprehensive Recycling Plan, or Franchised Hauler Review and Sign-Off. The applicant will have to submit evidence or a plan which indicates compliance with this section. Regardless of which method chosen, the applicant will have to submit a written sign-off from the franchise hauler regarding the facility location and compatibility. The applicant has chosen to demonstrate compliance with the Minimum Standards Method. According to Minimum Standards, an office use is required to provide a minimum storage area of 10 square feet, plus 4 square feet per 1,000 square feet gross floor area (GFA). The applicant is proposing to develop a 350 square foot building, which will require a 14 square foot storage area. The applicant has proposed a 120 square foot storage area. However, the applicant has not provided a sign-off letter from the franchise hauler regarding the facility location and compatibility. Therefore, the applicant will be required to provide a sign-off letter from the franchise hauler regarding the refuse facility compatibility. Location Standards. To encourage its use, the storage area for source-separated recyclable shall be co- located with the storage area for residual mixed solid waste; Indoor and outdoor storage areas shall comply with Uniform Building and Fire Code requirements; Storage area space requirements can be satisfied with a single location or multiple locations, and can combine both interior and exterior locations; Exterior storage areas can be located within interior side yard or rear yard areas. Exterior storage areas shall not be located within a required front yard setback or in a yard adjacent to a public or private street; Exterior storage areas shall be located in central and visible locations on a site to enhance security for users; Exterior storage areas can be located in a parking area, if the proposed use provides at least the minimum number of parking spaces required for the use after deducting the area used for storage. Storage areas shall be appropriately screened according to the provisions in 18.755.050 C, design standards; The storage area shall be accessible for collection vehicles and located so that the storage area will not obstruct pedestrian or vehicle traffic movement on the site or on public streets adjacent to the site. The refuse container is accessed from the parking lot and is visible in order to enhance security for users. The proposed refuse container is located at the south end of the lot and is not adjacent to any public or private street. Screening will be addressed under Section 18.755.050.0 (Design Standards) of this decision. Therefore, this criterion has been satisfied. Design Standards. The dimensions of the storage area shall accommodate containers consistent with current methods of local collection; Storage containers shall meet Uniform Fire Code standards and be made and covered with waterproof materials or situated in a covered area; Exterior storage areas shall be enclosed by a sight-obscuring fence wall, or hedge at least six feet in height. Gate openings which allow access to users and NOTICE OF TYPE II DECISION SDR2004-00010/DEZFULLI AUTO SALES PAGE 12 OF 28 haulers shall be provided. Gate openings for haulers shall be a minimum of 10 feet wide and shall be capable of being secured in a closed and open position; Storage area(s) and containers shall be clearly labeled to indicate the type of materials accepted. The applicant has proposed that the refuse container is to be enclosed by a 10 x 12 x six foot tall enclosure with a 10-foot-wide opening. Therefore, this standard has been satisfied. FINDING: Because the applicant has not provided evidence of compliance with the Mixed Solid Waste and Recyclables Storage design standards, this standard has not been met. If the applicant complies with the condition listed below, the standards will be met: CONDITION: Provide a sign-off letter from the franchise hauler regarding the refuse facility compatibility. Off-Street Parking and Loading (18.765): Location of vehicle parking: Off-street arking spaces for single-family and duplex dwellings and single-family attached dwellings shall be located on the same lot with the dwellings. Off-street parking lots for uses not listed above shall be located not further than 200 feet from the building or use that they are required to serve, measured in a straight line from the building with the following exceptions: a) commercial and industrial uses which require more than 40 parking spaces may provide for the spaces in excess of the required first 40 spaces up to a distance of 300 feet from the primary site; The 40 parking spaces which remain on the primary site must be available for users in the following order of priority: 1) Disabled-accessible spaces; 2) Short-term spaces; 3) Long-term preferential carpool and vanpool spaces; 4) Long-term spaces. The proposed use is a used car lot. The applicant is proposing to construct an associated 350 square foot sales office. According to the Off-Street Parking standards a use of this type is required to provide 1 parking stall for every 1,000 square feet of building but no less than 4 customer parking stalls. Because the applicant is only proposing a 350 square foot building, only 4 parking stalls are required. The applicant has shown four parking stalls marked as visitor parking stalls within 50 feet of the proposed sales office. Joint Parking: Owners of two or more uses, structures or parcels of land may agree to utilize jointly the same parking and loading spaces when the peak hours of operation do not overlay, subject to the following: 1) The size of the joint parking facility shall be at least as large as the number of vehicle parking spaces required by the larger(est) use per Section 18.765.070; 2) Satisfactory legal evidence shall be presented to the Director in the form of deeds, leases or contracts to establish the joint use; 3) If a joint use arrangement is subsequently terminated, or if the uses change, the requirements of this title thereafter apply to each separately. Joint parking is not proposed with this application. Therefore, this standard does not apply. Parking in Mixed-Use Projects: In mixed-use projects, the required minimum vehicle parking shall be determined using the following formula. 1) Primary use, i.e., that with the largest proportion of total floor area within the development, at 100% of the minimum vehicle parking required for that use in Section 18.765.060; 2) Secondary use, i.e., that with the second largest percentage of total floor area within the development, at 90% of the vehicle parking required for that use in Section 18.765.060; 3) Subsequent use or uses, at 80% of the vehicle parking required for that use(s) in Section 18.765.060; 4) The maximum parking allowance shall be 150% of the total minimum parking as calculated in D.1.-3. above. The project is not considered a mixed-use project. Therefore, this standard does not apply. NOTICE OF TYPE II DECISION SDR2004-00010/DEZFULLI AUTO SALES PAGE 13 OF 28 Visitor Parking in Multi-Family Residential Developments: Multi-dwelling units with more than 10 required parking spaces shall provide an additional 15% of vehicle parking spaces above the minimum required for the use of guests of residents of the complex. These spaces shall be centrally located or distributed throughout the development. Required bicycle parking facilities shall also be centrally located within or evenly distributed throughout the development. This project does not involve a residential use. Therefore, this standard does not apply. Preferential Long-Term CarpoolNanpool Parking: Parking lots providing in excess of 20 long-term parking spaces shall provide preferential long-term carpool and vanpool parking for employees, students and other regular visitors to the site. At least 5% of total long-term parking spaces shall be reserved for carpool/vanpool use. Preferential parking for carpools/vanpools shall be closer to the main entrances of the building than any other employee or student parking except parking spaces designated for use by the disabled. Preferential carpool/vanpool spaces shall be full-sized per requirements in Section 18.765.040N and shall be clearly designated for use only by carpools and vanpools between 7:00 AM and 5:30 PM Monday through Friday. The proposed use is for a used car lot. Four parking stalls are required and have been shown on the preliminary site plan. Therefore, the parking lot will not exceed 20 long-term parking spaces. This standard does not apply. Disabled-Accessible Parking: All parking areas shall be provided with the required number of parking spaces for disabled persons as specified by the State of Oregon Uniform Building Code and federal standards. Such parking spaces shall be sized, signed and marked as required by these regulations. The applicant is required to provide 4 parking stalls for customer parking. According to the State of Oregon Uniform Building Code and federal standards, a parking lot with 1-25 parking stalls is required to provide 1 stall that is ADA accessible. The site plan does indicate 1 ADA accessible parking stall located 5 feet from the main entrance of the proposed building. Therefore, this criterion has been satisfied. Access Drives: With regard to access to public streets from off-street parking: access drives from the street to off-street parking or loading areas shall be designed and constructed to facilitate the flow of traffic and provide maximum safety for pedestrian and vehicular traffic on the site; the number and size of access drives shall be in accordance with the requirements of Chapter, 18.705, Access, Egress and Circulation; access drives shall be clearly and permanently marked and defined through use of rails, fences, walls or other barriers or markers on frontage not occupied by service drives; access drives shall have a minimum vision clearance in accordance with Chapter 18.795, Visual Clearance; access drives shall be improved with an asphalt or concrete surface; and excluding single-family and duplex residences, except as provided by Subsection 18.810.030.P, groups of two or more parking spaces shall be served by a service drive so that no backing movements or other maneuvering within a street or other public right-of-way will be required. The access drive has been addressed previously in this decision under Chapter 18.705 (Access Egress and Circulation). Submitted plans show access drives to be developed with directional arrows that direct on-site traffic, and stripped pedestrian crossings are shown to be no greater than 36 feet in length. No backward maneuvering into the public right-of-way will be required and access drives will be constructed with asphalt. Therefore, this standard has been satisfied. NOTICE OF TYPE II DECISION SDR2004-00010/DEZFULLI AUTO SALES PAGE 14 OF 28 Pedestrian Access: Pedestrian access through parking lots shall be provided in accordance with Section 18.705.030.F. Where a parking area or other vehicle area has a drop-off grade separation, the property owner shall install a wall, railing, or other barrier which will prevent a slow-moving vehicle or driverless vehicle from escaping such area and which will prevent pedestrians from walking over drop-off edges. Pedestrian access has been discussed previously in this decision under Chapter 18.705 (Access Egress and Circulation). Therefore, this standard has been satisfied. Parking Lot Striping: Except for single-family and duplex residences, any area intended to be used to meet the off-street parking requirements as contained in this Chapter shall have all parking spaces clearly marked; and all interior drives and access aisles shall be clearly marked and signed to show direction of flow and maintain vehicular and pedestrian safety. The plans submitted show the parking spaces will be clearly marked with striping. Interior drives and access aisles are marked to show direction of traffic on the site. Therefore, this standard has been satisfied. Wheel Stops: Parking spaces along the boundaries of a parking lot or adjacent to interior landscaped areas or sidewalks shall be provided with a wheel stop at least four inches high located three feet back from the front of the parking stall. The front three feet of the parking stall may be concrete, asphalt or low lying landscape material that does not exceed the height of the wheel stop. This area cannot be calculated to meet landscaping or sidewalk requirements. The applicant has shown all parking stalls at the boundary of the subject site to include wheel stops. Therefore, this standard has been satisfied. Space and Aisle Dimensions: Section 18.765.040.N states that: "except as modified for angled parking in Figures 18.765.1 and 18.765.2 the minimum dimensions for parking spaces are: 8.5 feet x 18.5 feet for a standard space and 7.5 feet x 16.5 feet for a compact space; aisles accommodating two direction traffic, or allowing access from both ends, shall be 24 feet in width. The applicant's plans indicate that all parking stalls will meet the minimum dimensions for standard parking stalls. However, access isles are not consistently 24 feet wide throughout the property. Therefore, the applicant is required to submit a plan showing 24-foot-wide access isles in order to accommodate two-direction traffic. All drive isles must be maintained free of parked cars. Bicycle Parking Location and Access: Section 18.765.050 states bicycle parking areas shall be provided at locations within 50 feet of primary entrances to structures; bicycle parking areas shall not be located within parking aisles, landscape areas or pedestrian ways; outdoor bicycle parking shall be visible from on-site buildings and/or the street. When the bicycle parking area is not visible from the street, directional signs shall be used to located the parking area; and bicycle parking may be located inside a building on a floor which has an outdoor entrance open for use and floor location which does not require the bicyclist to use stairs to gain access to the space. Exceptions may be made to the latter requirement for parking on upper stories within a multi-story residential building. According to Table 18.765.2 of the Tigard Development Code, the minimum bicycle-parking requirement for a motor vehicle sales use is 0.2 spaces per 1,000 square feet. However, the proposed sales office will be approximately 350 square feet. According to Section 18.765.050.E, the minimum bicycle parking a use may have is 2 stalls. The applicant has shown an area dedicated to bicycle parking, but has not indicated how many parking stalls will be erected. NOTICE OF TYPE II DECISION SDR2004-00010/DEZFULLI AUTO SALES PAGE 15 OF 28 The proposed bicycle parking area is within 50 feet of the primary entrance of the sales office, is visible from the SW Naeve Street and does not block pedestrian traffic. Therefore, the applicant is required to submit a plan showing the bicycle parking structure to include no less than 2 bicycle parking stalls. Bicycle Parking Design Requirements: Section 18.765.050.C. The following design requirements apply to the installation of bicycle racks: The racks required for required bicycle parking spaces shall ensure that bicycles may be securely locked to them without undue inconvenience. Provision of bicycle lockers for long-term (employee) parking is encouraged but not required; bicycle racks must be securely anchored to the ground, wall or other structure; bicycle parking spaces shall be at least 21/2 feet by six feet long, and, when covered, with a vertical clearance of seven feet. An access aisle of at least five feet wide shall be provided and maintained beside or between each row of bicycle parking; each required bicycle parking space must be accessible without moving another bicycle; required bicycle parking spaces may not be rented or leased except where required motor vehicle parking is rented or leased. At-cost or deposit fees for bicycle parking are exempt from this requirement; and areas set aside for required bicycle parking must be clearly reserved for bicycle parking only. Outdoor bicycle parking facilities shall be surfaced with a hard surfaced material, i.e., pavers, asphalt, concrete or similar material. This surface must be designed to remain well drained. The applicant has not provided a detail of the bike rack to be used; therefore, the applicant will be required to provide a plan that shows the bicycle rack designed according to Section 18.765.050.C. of the Tigard Development Code. Minimum Bicycle Parking Requirements: The total number of required bicycle parking spaces for each use is specified in Table 18.765.2 in Section 18.765.070.H. In no case shall there be less than two bicycle parking spaces. As discussed above, according to Table 18.765.2 of the Tigard Development Code, the minimum bicycle-parking requirement for a vehicle sales use is 0.2 spaces per 1,000 square feet. Therefore, the proposed 350 square foot building is required to provide a minimum of a 2 stall bicycle rack, which has been conditioned above. Minimum Off-Street Parking: Section 18.765.070.H states that the minimum and maximum parking shall be as required in Table 18.765.2. Table 18.765.2 states that the minimum parking for a Vehicle Sales Use is 1.0 space per 1,000 square feet but no less than 4.0. Based on a 350 square foot building, the applicant is required to provide a minimum of 4 parking stalls. The applicant has indicated that 4 customer parking stalls will be available. Therefore, this standard has been satisfied. Off-Street Loading Spaces: Commercial, industrial and institutional buildings or structures to be built or altered which receive and distribute material or merchandise by truck shall provide and maintain off-street loading and maneuvering space as follows: A minimum of one loading space is required for buildings with 10,000 gross square feet or more; A minimum of two loading spaces for buildings with 40,000 gross square feet or more. The proposed site will be constructed with a sales office that is 350 square feet. Therefore, this standard does not apply. FINDING: Based on the analysis above, the off-street parking and loading standards have not been fully met, however, if the applicant complies with the conditions listed below, the standards will be fully met: NOTICE OF TYPE II DECISION SDR2004-00010/DEZFULLI AUTO SALES PAGE 16 OF 28 CONDITIONS: • Submit a plan showing 24-foot-wide access isles in order to accommodate two-direction traffic. All drive isles must be maintained free of parked cars. • Submit a plan showing the bicycle parking structure to include no less than 2 bicycle parking stalls. • Provide a plan that shows the bicycle rack designed according to Section 18.765.050.0 of the Tigard Development Code. Signs (18.780): Chapter 18.780.130.D lists the type of allowable signs and sign area permitted in the MUE Zoning District. Signs are reviewed through a separate permit process administered by the Development Services Technicians. FINDING: Because signs will be reviewed and approved as part of a separate permit process, this standard has been satisfied. Tree Removal (18.790): Section 18.790.030 requires that a tree plan for the planting, removal and protection of trees prepared by a certified arborist shall be provided with a site development review application. The tree plan shall include identification of all existing trees, identification of a program to save existing trees or mitigate tree removal over 12 inches in caliper, which trees are to be removed, protection program defining standards and methods that will be used by the applicant to protect trees during and after construction. According to the applicant's arborist, there are a total of 12 trees equal to or greater than 12- inches in diameter. Five of the trees greater than 12-inches are considered hazardous, leaving seven trees that are subject to preservation and/or removal. The narrative suggests that five of the viable trees are to be retained. The tree removal plan shows all trees except for two to be removed. The tree removal plan, the arborist report and the narrative do not correlate with each other. Therefore, the applicant is required to provide a new tree removal/protection/mitigation plan that correlates with the project arborists report. The required plan must be accompanied with a letter from the project arborist that acknowledges his or her review and approval. Any variation from the resubmitted plan will require an additional type II review. FINDING: Based on the analysis above, the tree removal standards have not been fully met. If the applicant complies with the condition listed below, the standards will be met: CONDITION: Provide a new tree removal/protection/mitigation plan that correlates with the project arborists report. The required plan must be accompanied with a letter from the project arborist that acknowledges his or her review and approval. Any variation from the resubmitted plan will require an additional type II review. Visual Clearance Areas (18.795): Chapter 18.795 requires that a clear vision area shall be maintained on the corners of all property adjacent to intersecting right-of-ways or the intersection of a public street and a private driveway. A clear vision area shall contain no vehicle, hedge, planting, fence, wall structure, or temporary or permanent obstruction exceeding three (3) feet in height. The code provides that obstructions that may be located in this area shall be visually clear between three (3) and eight (8) feet in height (8) (trees may be placed within this area provided that all branches below eight (8) feet are removed). A visual clearance area is the triangular area formed by measuring a 30-foot distance along the street right- of-way and the driveway, and then connecting these two (2), 30-foot distance points with a straight line. The applicant has indicated in the narrative and the site plan that a clear vision area will be maintained between 3 and 8 feet in height at the vehicular access of the property. NOTICE OF TYPE II DECISION SDR2004-00010/DEZFULLI AUTO SALES PAGE 17 OF 28 FINDING: Based on the analysis above, the vision clearance standards have been met. C. SPECIFIC SITE DEVELOPMENT REVIEW APPROVAL STANDARDS Section 18.360.090(A)(2) through 18.360.090(A)(15) provides additional Site Development Review approval standards not necessarily covered by the provisions of the previously listed sections. These additional standards are addressed immediately below with the following exceptions: The proposal contains no elements related to the provisions of the following and are, therefore, found to be inapplicable as approval standards: 18.360.090.3 (Exterior Elevations);); 18.360.090.5 (Privacy and Noise: Multi-family or Group Living Uses); 18.360.090.6 (Private Outdoor Areas: Multi-family Use); 18.360.090.7 (Shared Outdoor Recreation Areas: Multi-family Use); 18.360.090.8 (100-year floodplain); and 18.360.090.9 (Demarcation of Spaces). The following sections were discussed previously in this decision and, therefore, will not be addressed in this section: 18.360.090.4 (Buffering, Screening and Compatibility Between Adjoining Uses; 18.360.090.13 (Parking); 18.360.090.14 (Landscaping); 18.360.090.15 (Drainage); and 18.360.090.14 (Provision for the Disabled). Relationship to the Natural and Physical Environment: Buildings shall be: located to preserve existing trees, topography and natural drainage where possible based upon existing site conditions; located in areas not subject to ground slumping or sliding; located to provide adequate distance between adjoining buildings for adequate light, air circulation, and fire-fighting; and oriented with consideration for sun and wind. Trees shall be preserved to the extent possible. Replacement of trees is subject to the requirements of Chapter 18.790, Tree Removal. According to the applicant, the proposed building will have no impact on existing trees located on the site. Drainage is addressed later in this decision under Chapter 18.810 (Street and Utility Improvement Standards). The abutting parcel to the south is developed with a building that is approximately 56 feet away thus providing adequate light, air circulation, and fire-fighting access. Tree retention is discussed under Chapter 18.790 (Tree Removal) of this decision. Crime Prevention and Safety: • Windows shall be located so that areas vulnerable to crime can be surveyed by the occupants; • Interior laundry and service areas shall be located in a way that they can be observed by others; • Mail boxes shall be located in lighted areas having vehicular or pedestrian traffic; • The exterior lighting levels shall be selected and the angles shall be oriented towards areas vulnerable to crime; and • Light fixtures shall be provided in areas having heavy pedestrian or vehicular traffic and in potentially dangerous areas such as parking lots, stairs, ramps and abrupt grade changes. Fixtures shall be placed at a height so that light patterns overlap at a height of seven feet, which is sufficient to illuminate a person. The applicant has indicated that security measures will be addressed; however, the site plan does not show the proposed sales office or indicate parking lot lighting. Therefore, the applicant must submit a plan showing parking lot lighting and an elevation of the proposed sales office that shows windows and point of access. NOTICE OF TYPE II DECISION SDR2004-00010/DEZFULLI AUTO SALES PAGE 18 OF 28 Public Transit: Provisions within the plan shall be included for providing for transit if the development proposal is adjacent to existing or proposed transit route; the requirements for transit facilities shall be based on: the location of other transit facilities in the area; and the size and type of the proposal. The following facilities may be required after City and Tri-Met review: bus stop shelters; turnouts for buses; and connecting paths to the shelters. The site has frontage on SW Pacific Highway, which is a Tri-Met transit route. However, Tri-Met did not mention the need for an additional bus stop. The closest bus stop is approximately 500 feet from the subject site to the south at the corner of SW Pacific Highway and SW Royalty Parkway. Therefore, this standard does not apply. Provisions of the Underlying Zone: All of the provisions and regulations of the underlying zone shall apply unless modified by other sections or this title, e.g., Planned Developments, Chapter 18.350; or a variance or adjustment granted under Chapter 18.370. Dimensional Requirements: Provisions of the (C-G) Professional Commercial Zoning District have been addressed earlier in this decision under Section 18.520.040.B. FINDING: Based on the analysis above, the specific standards of the Site Development Review Section have not been met. CONDITION:Submit a plan showing parking lot lighting and an elevation of the proposed sales office that shows windows and point of access. D. Street And Utility Improvements Standards (Section 18.810): Chapter 18.810 provides construction standards for the implementation of public and private facilities and utilities such as streets, sewers, and drainage. The applicable standards are addressed below: Streets: Improvements: Section 18.810.030.A.1 states that streets within a development and streets adjacent shall be improved in accordance with the TDC standards. Section 18.810.030.A.2 states that any new street or additional street width planned as a portion of an existing street shall be dedicated and improved in accordance with the TDC. Minimum Rights-of-Way and Street Widths: Section 18.810.030.E requires a 5-lane Arterial Street to have a 104 foot right-of-way width and 72-foot paved section. Other improvements required may include on-street parking, sidewalks and bikeways, underground utilities, street lighting, storm drainage, and street trees. This site lies adjacent to SW Pacific Highway, which is classified as a 5-lane Arterial on the City of Tigard Transportation Plan Map. At present, there is approximately 125 feet of ROW total, according to the most recent tax assessor's map. The applicant should dedicate ROW at the radius for the intersection of Naeve Street and Pacific Highway. SW Pacific Highway is currently partially improved. In order to mitigate the impact from this development, the applicant should construct a 10-foot sidewalk at the ultimate location with a 5-foot planter strip, plant ODOT approved street trees and taper the sidewalk at the south end of their frontage back to the Nursery access and provide an ADA ramp. Section 18.810.030.E requires Neighborhood Routes to have a 54 foot right-of-way width and 32-foot paved section. Other improvements required may include on-street parking, sidewalks and bikeways, underground utilities, street lighting, storm drainage, and street trees. NOTICE OF TYPE II DECISION SDR2004-00010/DEZFULLI AUTO SALES PAGE 19 OF 28 This site lies adjacent to SW Naeve Street and Royalty Parkway, which are both classified as Neighborhood Routes on the City of Tigard Transportation Plan Map. At present, there is approximately 20 feet of ROW from centerline along the Naeve Street frontage, according to the most recent tax assessor's map. The applicant should dedicate the additional ROW to provide 27 feet from centerline and the radius at both intersections. There is 60 feet of ROW for Royalty Parkway. No additional ROW is required. SW Naeve Street is currently partially improved. In order to mitigate the impact from this development, the applicant should construct half-street improvements to the Neighborhood Route standard. SW Royalty Parkway is currently partially improved. In order to mitigate the impact from this development, the applicant should construct a 5-foot curb tight sidewalk along this frontage and plant street trees in accordance with the TDC. Future Street Plan and Extension of Streets: Section 18.810.030.F states that a future street plan shall be filed which shows the pattern of existing and proposed future streets from the boundaries of the proposed land division. This section also states that where it is necessary to give access or permit a satisfactory future division of adjoining land, streets shall be extended to the boundary lines of the tract to be developed and a barricade shall be constructed at the end of the street. These street stubs to adjoining properties are not considered to be cul-de-sacs since they are intended to continue as through streets at such time as the adjoining property is developed. A barricade shall be constructed at the end of the street by the property owners which shall not be removed until authorized by the City Engineer, the cost of which shall be included in the street construction cost. Temporary hammerhead turnouts or temporary cul-de-sac bulbs shall be constructed for stub streets in excess of 150 feet in length. No future streets are proposed. There are streets along 3 frontages and no opportunity to provide another street extension. Street Alignment and Connections: Section 18.810.030.H.1 states that full street connections with spacing of no more than 530 feet between connections is required except where prevented by barriers such as topography, railroads, freeways, pre-existing developments, lease provisions, easements, covenants or other restrictions existing prior to May 1, 1995 which preclude street connections. A full street connection may also be exempted due to a regulated water feature if regulations would not permit construction. Section 18.810.030.H.2 states that all local, neighborhood routes and collector streets which abut a development site shall be extended within the site to provide through circulation when not precluded by environmental or topographical constraints, existing development patterns or strict adherence to other standards in this code. A street connection or extension is precluded when it is not possible to redesign, or reconfigure the street pattern to provide required extensions. Land is considered topographically constrained if the slope is greater than 15% for a distance of 250 feet or more. In the case of environmental or topographical constraints, the mere presence of a constraint is not sufficient to show that a street connection is not possible. The applicant must show why the constraint precludes some reasonable street connection. There are no opportunities or advantages to providing another street connection or extension through this development. Grades and Curves: Section 18.810.030.N states that grades shall not exceed ten percent on arterials, 12% on collector streets, or 12% on any other street (except that local or residential access streets may have segments with grades up to 15% for distances of no greater than 250 feet). Centerline radii of curves shall be as determined by the City Engineer. The street grades for all three streets are significantly lower than 12% and meet this criterion. NOTICE OF TYPE II DECISION SDR2004-00010/DEZFULLI AUTO SALES PAGE 20 OF 28 Access to Arterials and Major Collectors: Section 18.810.030.Q states that where a development abuts or is traversed by an existing or proposed arterial or major collector street, the development design shall provide adequate protection for residential properties and shall separate residential access and through traffic, or if separation is not feasible, the design shall minimize the traffic conflicts. The design shall include any of the following: • A parallel access street along the arterial or major collector; • Lots of suitable depth abutting the arterial or major collector to provide adequate buffering with frontage along another street; • Screen planting at the rear or side property line to be contained in a non-access reservation along the arterial or major collector; or • Other treatment suitable to meet the objectives of this subsection; • If a lot has access to two streets with different classifications, primary access should be from the lower classification street. The applicant has not proposed to access directly to Pacific Highway. Rather, access will be provided onto both of the other lower classification streets. Lots - Size and Shape: Section 18.810.060(A) prohibits lot depth from being more than 2.5 times the average lot width, unless the parcel is less than 1.5 times the minimum lot size of the applicable zoning district. There is no minimum lot size within the C-G zoning district. Therefore, this standard does not apply. Lot Frontage: Section 18.810.060(B) requires that lots have at least 25 feet of frontage on public or private streets, other than an alley. In the case of a land partition, 18.420.050.A.4.c applies, which requires a parcel to either have a minimum 15-foot frontage or a minimum 15-foot wide recorded access easement. In cases where the lot is for an attached single-family dwelling unit, the frontage shall be at least 15 feet. The subject site has approximately 200 feet of frontage on SW Royalty Parkway and 440 feet along SW Naeve Street. Therefore, this standard has been satisfied. Sidewalks: Section 18.810.070.A requires that sidewalks be constructed to meet City design standards and be located on both sides of arterial, collector and local residential streets. Private streets and industrial streets shall have sidewalks on at least one side. The applicant's plans indicate they will construct sidewalk along all three frontages as part of their half-street improvements, thereby meeting this criterion. Sanitary Sewers: Sewers Required: Section 18.810.090.A requires that sanitary sewer be installed to serve each new development and to connect developments to existing mains in accordance with the provisions set forth in Design and Construction Standards for Sanitary and Surface Water Management (as adopted by Clean Water Services in 1996 and including any future revisions or amendments) and the adopted policies of the comprehensive plan. Over-sizing: Section 18.810.090.0 states that proposed sewer systems shall include consideration of additional development within the area as projected by the Comprehensive Plan. The applicant's plans indicate they will provide a lateral to the proposed building from the public sewer located in Royalty Parkway. Storm Drainage: General Provisions: Section 18.810.100.A requires developers to make adequate provisions for storm water and flood water runoff. NOTICE OF TYPE II DECISION SDR2004-00010/DEZFULLI AUTO SALES PAGE 21 OF 28 Accommodation of Upstream Drainage: Section 18.810.100.0 states that a culvert or other drainage facility shall be large enough to accommodate potential runoff from its entire upstream drainage area, whether inside or outside the development. The City Engineer shall approve the necessary size of the facility, based on the provisions of Design and Construction Standards for Sanitary and Surface Water Management (as adopted by Clean Water Services in 2000 and including any future revisions or amendments). There are no impacts from upstream drainage. Effect on Downstream Drainage: Section 18.810.100.D states that where it is anticipated by the City Engineer that the additional runoff resulting from the development will overload an existing drainage facility, the Director and Engineer shall withhold approval of the development until provisions have been made for improvement of the potential condition or until provisions have been made for storage of additional runoff caused by the development in accordance with the Design and Construction Standards for Sanitary and Surface Water Management (as adopted by Clean Water Services in 2000 and including any future revisions or amendments). In 1997, Clean Water Services (CWS) completed a basin study of Fanno Creek and adopted the Fanno Creek Watershed Management Plan. Section V of that plan includes a recommendation that local governments institute a stormwater detention/effective impervious area reduction program resulting in no net increase in storm peak flows up to the 25-year event. The City will require that all new developments resulting in an increase of impervious surfaces provide onsite detention facilities, unless the development is located adjacent to Fanno Creek. For those developments adjacent to Fanno Creek, the storm water runoff will be permitted to discharge without detention. The applicant shows stormwater being directed to both the system in Pacific Highway and in Royalty Parkway. The detention calculations only cover the portion directed to Pacific Highway. The engineer shall submit detention calculations with the PFI for the portion directed to Royalty Parkway. The applicant must have ODOT review and approve the detention calculations for the stormwater directed to Pacific Highway. All work within Pacific Highway will require an ODOT facility permit. Bikeways and Pedestrian Pathways: Bikeway Extension: Section 18.810.110.A states that developments adjoining proposed bikeways identified on the City's adopted pedestrian/bikeway plan shall include provisions for the future extension of such bikeways through the dedication of easements or right-of-way. Pacific Highway has an existing bicycle lane, therefore this criterion is met. Utilities: Section 18.810.120 states that all utility lines, but not limited to those required for electric, communication, lighting and cable television services and related facilities shall be placed underground, except for surface mounted transformers, surface mounted connection boxes and meter cabinets which may be placed above ground, temporary utility service facilities during construction, high capacity electric lines operating at 50,000 volts or above, and: • The developer shall make all necessary arrangements with the serving utility to provide the underground services; • The City reserves the right to approve location of all surface mounted facilities; • All underground utilities, including sanitary sewers and storm drains installed in streets by the developer, shall be constructed prior to the surfacing of the streets; and • Stubs for service connections shall be long enough to avoid disturbing the street improvements when service connections are made. NOTICE OF TYPE II DECISION SDR2004-00010/DEZFULLI AUTO SALES PAGE 22 OF 28 Exception to Under-Grounding Requirement: Section 18.810.120.0 states that a developer shall pay a fee in-lieu of under-grounding costs when the development is proposed to take place on a street where existing utilities which are not underground will serve the development and the approval authority determines that the cost and technical difficulty of under-grounding the utilities outweighs the benefit of under-grounding in conjunction with the development. The determination shall be on a case-by-case basis. The most common, but not the only, such situation is a short frontage development for which under-grounding would result in the placement of additional poles, rather than the removal of above-ground utilities facilities. An applicant for a development which is served by utilities which are not underground and which are located across a public right-of-way from the applicant's property shall pay a fee in-lieu of under-grounding. There are existing overhead utility lines along the frontage of SW Naeve Street. If the fee in- lieu is proposed, it is equal to $35.00 per lineal foot of street frontage that contains the overhead lines. The frontage along this site is 430 lineal feet; therefore the fee would be $15,050. If the site it served with power from Naeve Street then there is no required fee. ADDITIONAL CITY AND/OR AGENCY CONCERNS WITH STREET AND UTILITY IMPROVEMENT STANDARDS: Public Water System: The City of Tigard provides service in this area. There is an existing water line in Naeve Street and the applicant shows a service off of this line. Storm Water Quality: The City has agreed to enforce Surface Water Management (SWM) regulations established by Clean Water Services (CWS) Design and Construction Standards (adopted by Resolution and Order No. 00-7) which require the construction of on-site water quality facilities. The facilities shall be designed to remove 65 percent of the phosphorus contained in 100 percent of the storm water runoff generated from newly created impervious surfaces. In addition, a maintenance plan shall be submitted indicating the frequency and method to be used in keeping the facility maintained through the year. Prior to construction, the applicant shall submit plans and calculations for a water quality facility that will meet the intent of the CWS Design Standards. In addition, the applicant shall submit a maintenance plan for the facility that must be reviewed and approved by the City prior to construction. ODOT will have to approve the water quality calculations for the portion of the site runoff directed to Pacific Highway. The City will have to review and approve the water quality calculations for the portion of the site runoff directed to Royalty Parkway. To ensure compliance with Clean Water Services design and construction standards, the applicant shall employ the design engineer responsible for the design and specifications of the private water quality facility to perform construction and visual observation of the water quality facility for compliance with the design and specifications. These inspections shall be made at significant stages throughout the project and at completion of the construction. Prior to final building inspection, the design engineer shall provide the City of Tigard (Inspection Supervisor) with written confirmation that the water quality facility is in compliance with the design and specifications. Grading and Erosion Control: CWS 6esign and Construction Standards also regulate erosion control to reduce the amount of sediment and other pollutants reaching the public storm and surface water system resulting from development, construction, grading, excavating, clearing, and any other activity which accelerates erosion. Per CWS regulations, the applicant is required to submit an erosion control plan for City review and approval prior to issuance of City permits. NOTICE OF TYPE II DECISION SDR2004-000101DEZFULLI AUTO SALES PAGE 23 OF 28 The Federal Clean Water Act requires that a National Pollutant Discharge Elimination System (NPDES) erosion control permit be issued for any development that will disturb one or more acre of land. Since this site is over five acres, the developer will be required to obtain an NPDES permit from the City prior to construction. This permit will be issued along with the site and/or building permit. Site Permit Required: The applicant is required to obtain a Site Permit from the Building Division to cover all on-site private utility installations (water, sewer, storm, etc.) and driveway construction. This permit shall be obtained prior to approval of the final plat. Address Assignments: The City of Tigard is responsible for assigning addresses for parcels within the City of Tigard and within the Urban Service Boundary (USB). An addressing fee in the amount of $50.00 per address shall be assessed. This fee shall be paid to the City prior to issuance of building permits. E. IMPACT STUDY (18.390) Section 18.360.090 states, "The Director shall make a finding with respect to each of the following criteria when approving, approving with conditions or denying an application:" Section 18.390.040 states that the applicant shall provide an impact study to quantify the effect of development on public facilities and services. For each public facility system and type of impact, the study shall propose improvements necessary to meet City standard, and to minimize the impact of the development on the public at large, public facilities systems, and affected private property users. In situations where the Community Development Code requires the dedication of real property interests, the applicant shall either specifically concur with a requirement for public right-of-way dedication, or provide evidence that supports that the real property dedication is not roughly proportional to the projected impacts of the development. Section 18.390.040 states that when a condition of approval requires the transfer to the public of an interest in real property, the approval authority shall adopt findings which support the conclusion that the interest in real property to be transferred is roughly proportional to the impact the proposed development will have on the public. The applicant has provided an impact study addressing the project's impacts on public systems. The Washington County Traffic Impact Fee (TIF) is a mitigation measure that is required at the time of development. Based on a transportation impact study prepared by Mr. David Larson for the A-Boy Expansion/Dolan II/Resolution 95-61, TIF's are expected to recapture 32 percent of the traffic impact of new development on the Collector and Arterial Street system. The applicant will be required to pay TIF's of approximately $1,130.84 based on the use proposed. Based on the estimate that total TIF fees cover 32 percent of the impact on major street improvements citywide, a fee that would cover 100 percent of this projects traffic impact is $3,534($1 ,130.84 divided by .32). The difference between the TIF paid, and the full impact, is considered the unmitigated impact on the collector and arterial street system. The unmitigated impact of this project on the transportation system is $2,403. Tigard's Development Code section 18.810 requires that streets must be brought up to city standards for a development project to be approved. The applicant has proposed to construct half- street improvements along SW Naeve Street and SW Royalty Parkway since this is the frontage from which they are obtaining access. Therefore, this section is satisfied. SECTION VII. OTHER STAFF COMMENTS The City of Tigard Police Department has reviewed the proposal and has offered the following comments: • Request lighting plan for exterior. NOTICE OF TYPE II DECISION SDR2004-00010/DEZFULLI AUTO SALES PAGE 24 OF 28 The City of Tigard's Forester has reviewed the proposal and has offered comments. A full version of the City Forester's comments can be found in the land-use file. Below is a list of the Forester's recommended conditions of approval. RECOMMENDED CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL: The applicant shall submit a final Tree Protection Plan that shows exactly how far the tree protection fencing will be from the face of each protected tree (including those on neighboring properties where construction occurs within the trees' driplines) that will be impacted by construction activities within its dripline. The applicant, through their Project Arborist, shall justify the close proximity of the construction activities to the trees. He shall certify that the activities will not adversely impact the overall and long-term health and stability of each tree. Any construction that occurs within the neighboring trees' driplines should be ustified by the applicant and approved by the City Forester and neighboring property owner(s). Work may proceed within the driplines only with the approval of the City Forester. The Project Arborist shall submit written reports to the City Forester, at least, once every two weeks, as he monitors the construction activities and progress. These reports should include any changes that occurred to the TPZ as well as the condition and location of the tree protection fencing. If the amount of TPZ was reduced then the Project Arborist shall justify why the fencing was moved, and shall certify that the construction activities to the trees did not adversely impact the overall and long-term health and stability of the tree(s). If the reports are not submitted or received by the City Forester at the scheduled intervals, and if it appears the TPZ's or the Tree Protection Plan is not being followed by the contractor, the City can stop work on the project until an inspection can be done by the City Forester and the Project Arborist. This inspection will be to evaluate the tree rotection fencing, determine if the fencing was moved at any point during construction, and determine if any part of the Tree Protection Plan has been violated. Prior to issuance of building permits the Project Arborist shall submit to the City Forester a final report describing how the Tree Protection Plan was implemented and detailing any failures to comply with the Tree Protection Plan. The report shall also describe the health of all remaining trees on the site, with details provided as to any tree that has had its root system disturbed or that has otherwise been damaged. If you have any questions please call me anytime. Thank you for requesting my comments on this project The City of Tigard Building Division has reviewed the proposal and offered the following comments: • Building at south property line appears to be to close to property line. No scale on plans to determine distance. SECTION VIII. AGENCY COMMENTS Tualatin Valley Fire and Rescue has reviewed the proposal and has offered the following comments: 1) SURFACE AND LOAD CAPACITIES: Fire apparatus access roads shall be of an all- weather surface that is easily distinguishable from the surrounding area and is capable of supporting not less than 12,500 pounds point load (wheel load) and 75,000 pounds live load (gross vehicle weight). You may need to provide documentation from a registered engineer that the design will be capable of supporting such loading. 2) TURNING RADIUS: The inside turning radius and outside turning radius shall be not less than 28 feet and 48 feet respectively, measured from the same center point. NOTICE OF TYPE II DECISION SDR2004-00010/DEZFULLI AUTO SALES PAGE 25 OF 28 3) PAINTED CURBS: Where required, fire apparatus access roadway curbs shall be painted red and marked "NO PARKING FIRE LANE" at approved intervals. Lettering shall have a stroke of not less than one inch wide by six inches high. Lettering shall be white on red background. 4) COMMERCIAL BUILDINGS - REQUIRED FIRE FLOW: The required fire flow for the building shall not exceed 3,000 gallons per minute (GPM) or the available GPM in the water delivery system at 20 psi, whichever is less as calculated using IFC, Appendix B. A worksheet for calculating the required fire flow is available from the Fire Marshal's Office. 5) FIRE HYDRANTS — COMMERCIAL BUILDINGS: Where a portion of the building is more than 400 feet from a hydrant on a fire apparatus access road, as measured in an approved route around the exterior of the building, on-site fire hydrants and mains shall be provided. This distance may be increased to 600 feet for buildings equipped throughout with an approved automatic sprinkler system. 6) FIRE HYDRANT NUMBER AND DISTRIBUTION: The minimum number and distribution of fire hydrants available to a building shall not be less than that listed in Appendix C, Table C 105.1. Considerations for placing fire hydrants may be as follows: • Existing hydrants in the area may be used to meet the required number of hydrants as approved. Hydrants that are up to 600 feet away from the nearest point of a subject building that is protected with fire sprinklers may contribute to the required number of hydrants. • Hydrants that are separated from the subject building by railroad tracks shall not contribute to the required number of hydrants unless approved by the fire code official. • Hydrants that are separated from the subject building by divided highways or freeways shall not contribute to the required number of hydrants. Heavily traveled collector streets only as approved by the fire code official. • Hydrants that are accessible only by a bridge shall be acceptable to contribute to the required number of hydrants only if approved by the fire code official. 7) FIRE HYDRANT DISTANCE FROM AN ACCESS ROAD: Fire hydrants shall be located not more than 15 feet from an approved fire apparatus access roadway. 8) REFLECTIVE HYDRANT MARKERS: Fire hydrant locations shall be identified by the installation of reflective markers. The markers shall be blue. They shall be located adjacent and to the side of the centerline of the access road way that the fire hydrant is located on. In case that there is no center line, then assume a centerline, and place the reflectors accordingly 9) ACCESS AND FIRE FIGHTING WATER SUPPLY DURING CONSTRUCTION: Approved fire apparatus access roadways and fire fighting water supplies shall be installed and operational prior to any combustible construction or storage of combustible materials on the site. The Oregon Department of Transportation has reviewed the proposal and offered the following comments: NOTICE OF TYPE II DECISION SDR2004-00010/DEZFULLI AUTO SALES PAGE 26 OF 28 • Curb, sidewalk and bikeways shall be constructed consistent with the local Transportation System Plan and Regional Transportation Plan (if applicable) to current local, ODOT/ADA standards to provide pedestrian and bicycle access to the site. • Right of way dedication as necessary to accommodate the planned cross section identified in the Transportation System Plan shall be provided through deed to the Oregon Department of Transportation. • An ODOT Miscellaneous Permit is required for all work in the highway right of way. • An ODOT Drainage Permit is required for connection to state highway drainage facilities. Connection will only be considered if the site's drainage naturally enters ODOT right of way. The applicant must provide ODOT District with a preliminary drainage plan showing impacts to the highway right of way. A drainage study prepared by an Oregon Registered Professional Engineer is usually required by ODOT if: 1. Total peak runoff entering the highway right of way is greater than 1.77 cubic feet per second; or 2. The improvements create an increase of the impervious surface area greater than 10,758 square feet. The City of King City has reviewed the proposal and has no objection to it. SECTION IX. PROCEDURE AND APPEAL INFORMATION Notice: Notice was posted at City Hall and mailed to: X The applicant and owners X Owner of record within the required distance X Affected government agencies Final Decision: THIS DECISION IS FINAL ON MARCH 16, 2005 AND BECOMES EFFECTIVE ON MARCH 31, 2005 UNLESS AN APPEAL IS FILED. Appeal: The decision of the Director (Type II Procedure) or Review Authority (Type II Administrative Appeal or Type III Procedure) is final for purposes of appeal on the date that it is mailed. Any party with standing as provided in Section 18.390.040.G.1. may appeal this decision in accordance with Section 18.390.040.G.2. of the Tigard Community Development Code which provides that a written appeal together with the required fee shall be filed with the Director within ten (10) business days of the date the notice of the decision was mailed. The appeal fee schedule and forms are available from the Planning Division of Tigard City Hall, 13125 SW Hall Boulevard, Tigard, Oregon 97223. NOTICE OF TYPE II DECISION SDR2004-00010/DEZFULLI AUTO SALES PAGE 27 OF 28 Unless the applicant is the appellant, the hearing on an appeal from the Director's Decision shall be confined to the specific issues identified in the written comments submitted by the parties during the comment period. Additional evidence concerning issues properly raised in the Notice of Appeal may be submitted by any party during the appeal hearing, subject to any additional rules of procedure that may be adopted from time to time by the appellate body. THE DEADLINE FOR FILING AN APPEAL IS AT 5:00 PM ON MARCH 30, 2005. Questions: If you have any questions, please call the City of Tigard Planning Division, Tigard City Hall, 13125 SW Hall Boulevard, Tigard, Oregon at (503) 639-4171. March 16, 2005 PREPA B Mat Scheidegger DATE Associate Planner fij March 16, 2005 APPR VED BY: Richard H. Bewersdorff DATE Planning Manager I:\curpin\mathew\sd r\SDR2004-00010.dec.dot NOTICE OF TYPE II DECISION SDR2004-00010/DEZFULLI AUTO SALES PAGE 28 OF 28 CITY of TIGARD lio r GEOGRAPHIC INFORMATION SYSTEM e VICINITY MAP l///////pil '� SDR2004-00010 ��''' ooh ° o r 2 1 0 VIE.0000p$�� o o DELFULLI AUTO SALES 0000 o� SS( op oo aooaa o• 0000° • iI Z p o _ m• Q .. /V IN ',el- Im O &1I tea ' , . 1� � C �Qy III Ilk, " Q BULL FAT:.:i. •AA�"D oo tST /. IP _ s } ° ° BEC•eEw * 11141r — ° ° O o ' (� ° ° - --CI O ° ° Tigard Area Map I I, illse,c,,..„ ° ° o ° °°O°°° ° o 0 0 0►/ ° 0000 N ' o ° 0000 N 4 ' °o°o� ° = ° °°°o°°o ke ' o ° o � °I=OO ° °oo ° 0 • 100 200 300 400 Feet ' o o = ° .0.( 1'�311 test o 0000 ° 0 8 + o°°� Alik 4 T � '' City of Tigard •' i •• Information on this map is for general location only and p should be verified with the Development Services Division. ° 13125 SW Hall Blvd ~ ° 0 1 an/ Ti(503)639-4171, 9 • ° \\) I I httpalwww.cibgard.or.us Community Development Plot date:Feb 1,2005;C:ImagicWIAGIC03.APR I 8 _ _ yW Y 9gW _ _`_X S W. PA(' „ WA y ,� a _ f w -� _ 7'�� e > w s E�. v - / � o '0 -,-,,k � ,, �� I E i t'' / I O 1. / / , 1 a( li fl `ho ' r / oi r Fr s f os i , � j , �ig i / ,\�� / O\� '- i 00r► if Q;, / i � �' '% /% ``sue, / / i n I ,t11 i • } /1 ... `��° ?o i i s o"�Q 000:o-vo -"l 0 •i.; 1; 1 41 w cy lr r a i 0e 1 1 1 n NIP,C! �c ' ' z Li) '�1 : L I il ' , /rte n \,,,\r„.....--' ...:Eis . ...i. 1r ; /irf / z \ i / / /E / / E / , / — ! 0 SP EE' PROJECT: - DE901E0. 8/10 DEZFULLI AUTO SALES M41w ES ME°R Pao,kC, DER _A\D S O A== :1_A\ °�7. ,xkK9 EBRAHIM DEZFULLI 1 124 1: x341•.c I 1 141:M0-dEWR 9T12a (awl S.5.33 `/ /8 1T hrahin rin Oe2fulli Sp 4`g0010 87 SW 33d OEZ UlL1 AU1O S ACES T 95d, OR 97X23 �OT Region 1 At : Mar ah Daniel e 123 riders St, et pertland, O R 972 09 Marilyn Katz 435 SA' z f'ortl5nd VV 114th Ct. OR g�X24 Apt. 97 Franklin n Chase 5371 Tigard, OR 9 2 Ct. *1 Og X24 AFFIDAVIT OF MAILING CITY Community Development SkapingA Better Community I, cPatricia L. Luns{ord, being first duly sworn/affirm, on oath depose and say that I am a Senior Administrative Specialist for the City of7igar , Washington County, Oregon and that I served the following: {Check Appropnate Box(s)Beiow} © NOTICE OF DECISION FOR: SDR2004-00010/DEIFULLI AUTO SALES ❑ AMENDED NOTICE (File No/Name Reference) ® City of Tigard Planning Director A copy of the said notice being hereto attached, marked EXhiblt"A", and by reference made a part hereof, was mailed to each named person(s) at the address(s) shown on the attached list(s), marked Exhibit'B", and by reference made a part hereof, on March 16,2005, and deposited in the United States Mail on March 16,2005, postage prepaid. %� bL1vd. (Person tha 'repared Notice) STATE OF O2 EGOW ) County of Washington )ss. City of Tigard ) Subscribed and sworn/affirmed before me on the /U — day of , 2005. ^. A OFFICIAL SEAL 171-r SUE ROSS ��3! NOTggy pCBLIC-pEGON OMMISSION NO 37152 MY COMMISC SION EXPIRES DEC. 1,2007 a■CA NOTARY Py I. OF OREGON ta-1-67 My Commis n Expires: EXHIBIL_ NOTICE OF TYPE II DECISION SITE DEVELOPMENT REVIEW (SDR) 2004-00010 TI GARD CITY OF TI DEZFULLI AUTO SALES DeveCopmenr Shaping Better Community 120 DAYS = 5/31/2005 SECTION I. APPLICATION SUMMARY FILE NAME: DEZFULLI AUTO SALES CASE NO.: Site Development Review (SDR) SDR2004-00010 PROPOSAL: The applicant proposes to construct a used automobile sales lot with an associated 350 square foot sales office. OWNER: Ebrahim & Shahin Dezfulli APPLICANT: Same 12587 SW 133rd Avenue Tigard, OR 97223 LOCATION: 15280 SW Pacific Highway; WCTM 2S110DB, Tax Lot 1200. ZONE: C-G: General Commercial District. The C-G zoning district is designed to accommodate a full range of retail, office and civic uses with a Citywide and even regional trade area. Except where non-conforming, residential uses are limited to single-family residences which are located on the same site as a permitted use. A wide range of uses, including but not limited to adult entertainment, automotive equipment repair and storage, mini-warehouses, utilities, heliports, medical centers, major event entertainment, and gasoline stations, are permitted conditionally. APPLICABLE REVIEW CRITERIA: Community Development Code Chapters 18.360, 18.390, 18.520, 18.705, 18.725, 18.745, 18.755, 18.765, 18.780, 18.790, 18.795 and 18.810. SECTION II . DECISION Notice is hereby given that the City of Tigard Community Development Director's designee has APPROVED the request for Site Development Review subject to certain conditions of approval. The findings and conclusions on which the decision is based are noted in the full decision, available at City Hall. THIS APPROVAL SHALL BE VALID FOR 18 MONTHS FROM THE EFFECTIVE DATE OF THIS DECISION. All documents and applicable criteria in the above-noted file are available for inspection at no cost or copies can be obtained for twenty-five cents (25,:) per page, or the current rate charged for copies at the time of the request. SECTION III. PROCEDURE AND APPEAL INFORMATION Notice: Notice mailed to: X The applicant and owners X Owner of record within the required distance X Affected government agencies Final Decision: THIS DECISION IS FINAL ON MARCH 16, 2005 AND BECOMES EFFECTIVE ON MARCH 31, 2005 UNLESS AN APPEAL IS FILED. Appeal: The Director's Decision is final on the date that it is mailed. All persons entitled to notice or who are otherwise adversely affected or aggrieved by the decision as provided in Section 18.390.040.G.1 may appeal this decision in accordance with Section 18.390.040.G.2 of the Tigard Community Development Code which provides that a written appeal together with the required fee shall be filed with the Director within ten (10) business days of the date the Notice of Decision was mailed. The appeal fee schedule and forms are available from the Planning Division of Tigard City Hall, 13125 SW Hall Boulevard, Tigard, Oregon 97223. Unless the applicant is the appellant, the hearing on an appeal from the Director's Decision shall be confined to the specific issues identified in the written comments submitted by the parties during the comment period. Additional evidence concerning issues properly raised in the Notice of Appeal may be submitted by any party during the appeal hearing, subject to any additional rules of procedure that may be adopted from time to time by the appellate body. THE DEADLINE FOR FILING AN APPEAL IS 5:00 PM ON MARCH 30, 2005. Questions: For further information please contact the Planning Division Staff Planner, Mathew Scheidegger at 503-639-4171, Tigard City Hall, 13125 SW Hall Boulevard, Tigard, Oregon 97223.IIPTiflor , ,gok .,Il . . . ... _._ VICIIIITY IMP l'allP tom ® B-,19 SDR2004-00010 Isir Vit B / DEZFOW AUTO SALES 1��. Olk.*\\\\97 7. ti 0 ii. :t V4 iir8 \\ " '4Ai►l • 4111P B e e e I ...__ ,,Yd± :K -_— _ .11 El P AT . . . B g far . . . . ex x. i . CH),of T.ovd tom en_ .,.: >.. CanmwiMy.^^.. .1,MOS.C YnepkV.UGIC01 APR ' / 14, `° hl fill = -< 3 I ,( -,y.�^ .. �' V ti 1/2 namo CCMWANt CHURCH 0 ti i , &I. -- I .0.e.f..- ;,-_--i"---s-Lmticsn,,K4 ----. i ,i i .0 r � 11 '•fi • "�✓ N.r i i ii '•� • y t 1 1 2S110DB-90821 2S110CA-80591 EXHIBIT.., . ADAMS JOSEPH J CHENOWETH MILDRED H 15432 SW 114TH CT#82 11545 SW MAJESTIC LN#4 TIGARD, OR 97224 KING CITY, OR 97224 2S110DB-91031 2S110CA-80601 ALDERMAN JOHN M LIVING TRUST COLLIVER WINIFRED R BY ALDERMAN JOHN M TRUSTEE 11545 SW MAJESTIC LANE#3 15373 SW 114TH CT#103 KING CITY,OR 97224 TIGARD,OR 97224 2S1 10CA-80431 2S1 10 D B-90842 ANDERSON CLAUDIA A CONNER VERNA D& 15100 SW CROWN DR#8 HUMPHREY GRETCHEN G TRUSTEES TIGARD, OR 97224 15432 SW 114TH CT#84 TIGARD,OR 97224 2S110CA-80571 2S110DB-91001 BARNA EUGENE A TRUSTEE CURRIE CRAIG H&SHIRLEY A 10606 SW CAPITOL HWY#111 10306 E SILVERTREE CT PORTLAND,OR 97219 SUN LAKES,AZ 85248 2S110DB-90982 25110CA-80881 BARNETT ANGELA DAVIS JAMES M&ESTALENE A 15435 SW 114TH CT#98 11505 SW TERRA LINDA TIGARD, OR 97224 BEAVERTON,OR 97005 2S110CA-80861 25110CA-80801 BELLAIRS DON E DENNY ADELE C& 15270 SW CROWN DR#1 STOCKMAN RESI Y& KING CITY,OR 97224 O'DWYER KATHLEEN A 15200 SW CROWN DR#3 KING CITY,OR 97224 2S110CA-80491 2S110CA-00103 BROWN WALTER L&GERALDINE M DENNY PURKEY LLC REVOCABLE TRUST 15350 SW 116TH 15100 SW CROWN DR#2 KING CITY,OR 97224 KING CITY, OR 97224 2S110CA-80561 2S110DB-00301 BURNETT REVOCABLE TRUST DEZFULLI EBRAHIM&SHAHIM BY BURNETT LORETTA C& 12587 SW 133RD AVE COOK ELAINE B TRS TIGARD,OR 97223 11545 SW MAJESTIC LN#7 KING CITY, OR 97224 2S110CA-80471 2S1100B-01200 CAMPBELL MYRTLE M DEZFULLI SHAHIN&EBRAHIM 15100 SW CROWN DR#4 12587 SW 133RD KING CITY, OR 97224 TIGARD,OR 97223 2S110DB-91092 2S110CA-80711 CHAVE P FRANKLIN DOVE BOB N&JANICE E 15371 SW 114TH CT#109 11530 SW MAJESTIC LN#2 TIGARD, OR 97224 KING CITY, OR 97224 2S 110CA-80551 2S1 10 DB-00702 DUSEVOIR EUGENE&EVELYN H GMS REALTY LLC 10405 SW DENNEY RD TRLR 59 5973 AVENIDA ENCINAS STE 300 BEAVERTON,OR 97008 CARLSBAD,CA 92008 2S110CA-80751 2S110CA-80741 EDMONSON MIRIAM E GONSALVES ELIZABETH&CARLOS 15215 SW 116TH AVE UNIT#2 15215 SW 116TH AVE#1 PORTLAND, OR 97224 KING CITY, OR 97224 110DB-9000 2S110CA-80781 F T AT SUMMERFIELD CONDO P GREGG NANCY L OW OF UNITS 15255 SW 116TH UNIT#2 0 KING CITY,OR 97224 110DC-9000 2S110DB-90811 FO T AT SUMMERFIELD CONDO P HAISE MARY GRANT TRUST OW S OF UNITS BY MARY GRANT HAISE TR 0 15432 SW 114TH CT#81 TIGARD,OR 97224 2S110CA-80761 2S110DB-91081 FRANK SHIRLEY A HAMMERSCHMITH HELEM M 15215 SW 116TH#3 15371 SW 114TH CT#108 KING CITY,OR 97224 TIGARD,OR 97224 2S110CA-80441 2S110CA-80701 FRIESEN SUSAN K HANNA ALMA L REV LIV TRUST 15100 SW CROWN DR#7 11530 SW MAJESTIC LN#1 KING CITY, OR 97224 KING CITY,OR 97224 2S1100B-90381 2S110DB-91022 FROST LENA D HARRISON H FAYE 15485 SW 114TH CT UNIT 38 15435 SW 114TH CT#102 TIGARD, OR 97223 TIGARD,OR 97224 2S110DB-90952 2S110DB-00201 GEORGESON RAYMOND M&FAY M HOLLAND HOLDINGS I ARBOR 15437 SW 114TH#95 HEIGHTS LLC TIGARD, OR 97224 BY CLYDE HOLLAND PARTNERS LLC 1111 MAIN ST STE 710 VANCOUVER,WA 98660 2S 110CA-80421 11 0 D B-00200 GILBERT NANCY E TRUSTEE Ho. AND HOLD'. S I ARBOR 11480 SW CROWN DR#1 HEIG •S LL KING CITY,OR 97224 BY CLY.'' OLLAND PARTNERS LLC 111 VAIN S TE 710 NCOUVER,WA 98660 2S1 10 DC-02200 2S1 10 CA-80501 GMC REALTY LLC HOLMAN WILLIAM C 5973 AVENIDA ENCINAS STE 300 HOLMAN SUSAN M CARLSBAD. CA 92008 8040 SW BROADMOOR TERRACE PORTLAND, OR 97225 25110CA-80811 2S110CA-80821 HURLESS ROBERT W& LATTANZI JOSEPHINE F FOX JOHN M/ELIZABETH A HURLESS MORIN RITA K 15200 SW CROWN DR#2 15200 SW CROWN DRIVE#1 KING CITY,OR 97224 KING CITY,OR 97224 2S 110CA-80531 2S1 10 DB-00703 JIMERSON LAURA LUCILE LES SCHWAB TIRE CENTERS OF PORTL 2862 ROSECLIFFE CT#13 STORE ACCOUNTING LAKE OSWEGO, OR 97034 PO BOX 667 PRINEVILLE, OR 97754 2S1 10 D B-00500 2S 110CA-80871 KASCH'S GARDEN&NURSERIES INC LUCAS NEATIN 6566 SE LAKE RD#A 15290 SW CROWN DR#4 MILWAUKIE,OR 97222 KING CITY, OR 97224 2S110DB-90971 2S110CA-80541 KATZ MARILYN A&STEPHEN A LUNDELL ROBERT G SR 15435 SW 114TH CT#97 11505 SW MAJESTIC LN TIGARD, OR 97224 KING CITY,OR 97224 2S110DB-90991 2S110CA-00100 KESSLER LORRAINE LUTON ROBERT C 15435 SW 114TH#99 Go KVERNLAND ERIC B TIGARD, OR 97224 15390 SW 116TH AVE TIGARD,OR 97224 2S11008-90371 2S110DB-91102 KINCAID JUANITA LYNCH MARY LOUISE 15485 SW 114TH CT#37 15371 SW 114TH CT#110 TIGARD, OR 97224 TIGARD,OR 97224 2S110CA-00102 2S110CA-80691 KING CITY CITY OF LYNN LARRY J&SHANNON D 15300 SW 116TH 7415 SW EAST LAKE CT KING CITY,OR 97224 WILSONVILLE, OR 97070 2S110CA-01600 2S110CA-80721 KING CITY CIVIC ASSOCIATION MARTIN CARL W&LORRAINE M 15245 SW 116TH 7302 N CHRISTIE DR KING CITY. OR 97223 TUCSON,AZ 85718 10CA-800 2S 110CA-80911 KIN CONDO UNIT OWNERS MAY JOAN H TRUSTEE 15290 SW CROWN DR#1 KING CITY,OR 97224 10CA-808 1 2S1 100 B-90362 KIN I CONDOMINIUM MCMULLEN RICHARD D AND OW F UNITS GERTRUDE M TRUSTEES 15485 SW 114TH CT#36 TIGARD,OR 97224 2S110DB,90442 2S110DB-91041 MESSINGER EDWARD J AND ANN B POLLOW NORMA JEANNE 15483 SW 114TH CT#44 15373 SW 114TH CT#104 TIGARD,OR 97224 TIGARD,OR 97224 2S1 10 D B-90891 2S1 10 D B-90882 MEYER RICHARD J SR PROVINCE LAVELLE 15437 SW 114TH CT#89 15430 SW 114TH CT#88 TIGARD,OR 97224 TIGARD,OR 97224 2S110CA-80731 2S110CA-80511 MILLER PATRICIA RAY ROBERT W&MARY E 11530 SW MAJESTIC LN#4 11505 SW MAJESTIC LN 809-5 TIGARD,OR 97223 KING CITY,OR 97224 2S110CA-80831 2S110CA-80851 MOORE ELEANOR M RICKNER RICHARD H&JUDI A 15270 SW CROWN DR#4 13500 SW PACIFIC HWY KING CITY,OR 97224 PMB 136 TIGARD,OR 97223 2S110DB-90901 2S110CA-80791 O'KEEFFE LIVING TRUST THE ROGERS WILLIAM L BY ARTHUR F JRNIRGINIA O'KEEFFE TR 2155 SW 75TH AVE 15437 SW 114TH CT#90 PORTLAND,OR 97225 TIGARD, OR 97224 2S110DB-01300 2S110DB-90962 PARR-FRANKLIN LLC RYAN THOMAS E REVOCABLE TRUST& 1300 SW 5TH#2815 RYAN JOAN M REVOCABLE TRUST PORTLAND, OR 97201 15518 SW 114TH CT#57 TIGARD,OR 97224 2S 110CA-80901 2S 110 DB-90392 PETERSEN GENE M& SCHENK SOPHIA M SMITH-PETERSON PAULA M 15485 SW 114TH CT#39 15290 SW CROWN DR#3 TIGARD,OR 97224 KING CITY, OR 97224 2S1 10 D B-90931 2S110013-91071 PICKETT GEORGE E& SCHOUWEILER ALLYN H&JOAN C THELMA E CO-TRUSTEES 15371 SW 114TH CT#107 15437 SW 114TH CT TIGARD,OR 97224 TIGARD, OR 97224 2S110CA-80581 2S110CA-80771 PINKER SHIRLEY JEAN SCHULER PEARL J 11545 SW MAJESTIC LN#5 15255 SW 116TH AVE#1 TIGARD, OR 97224 KING CITY,OR 97224 2S110CA-80451 2S110DB-90912 PIO BARBARA J TRUSTEE SCOTT JOSEPH V&BEVERLY J 15100 SW CROWN DR#6 15437 SW 114TH CT#91 KING CITY,OR 97224 TIGARD, OR 97224 2S110CA-80621 2S110CA-80461 SHEVCHENKO EDITH U WALKER GORDON V& 11545 SW MAJESTIC LN#1 WALKER SUSAN B KING CITY, OR 97224 13900 SW 115TH TIGARD,OR 97223 2S110DB-91052 2S110CA-80611 SKYHAR WILLIAM&GENEVIEVE R TR WARD MAVIS H 15373 SW 114TH CT#105 11545 SW MAJESTIC LN#2 TIGARD, OR 97224 KING CITY, OR 97224 2S110DB-90351 2S110DB-00704 SPRECHER PAUL& DOLORIS P REVOC WASHINGTON FEDERAL SAVINGS BY SPRECHER PAUL&DOLORIS P TRS ACCOUNTING DEPT BR 118 15485 SW 114TH CT#35 425 PIKE ST TIGARD,OR 97224 SEATTLE,WA 98101 2S 110 D B-91012 2S 110CA-80481 SPYKER ELINA TRUSTEE WEBER MABEL L SZALOBRYT JANE C TRUSTEE 15100 SW CROWN DR#3 15435 SW 114TH CT#101 KING CITY,OR 97224 TIGARD,OR 97224 2S110DB-91062 2S1100B-90941 SZEPESI LESLIE L&MICHELE K WEEDMAN WENDY SUE 10321 LAKE DR SE 15437 SW 114TH CT#94 SALEM,OR 97306 TIGARD,OR 97224 2S1100A-80411 2S110CA-80841 THAYER CAROYLE J WIESE YVONNE H 442 50TH AVE NW 15270 SW CROWN DR#2 SALEM, OR 97304 KING CITY,OR 97224 2S1 10 D B-00300 2S1 10 D B-90922 TIGARD COVENANT CHURCH WILSON PHYLLIS A 11321 SW NAEVE ST 15437 SW 114TH CT#92 TIGARD,OR 97224 TIGARD,OR 97224 2S110DB-90402 2S110CA-80521 TILLINGHAST RUTH P TRUSTEE WORKMAN MARY MARIE& 15485 SW 114TH#40 WORKMAN JUDY TIGARD,OR 97224 11505 SW MAJESTIC LN#4 PORTLAND,OR 97224 2S1 10DB-90832 2S11 DDB-90861 TRACY SHARON M YODER JOSEPH H 15432 SW 114TH CT#83 PMB 504 TIGARD, OR 97224 15532 SW PACIFIC HWY#C18 TIGARD,OR 97224 2S110CA-80681 TUPPER RICHARD C& FLORENCE M 11520 SW MAJESTIC LN#2 TIGARD, OR 97223 Josh Thomas 10395 SW Bonanza Tigard, OR 97224 Kristen Miller 8940 SW Edgewood Street Tigard, OR 97223 Paul Owen 10335 SW Highland Drive Tigard, OR 97224 Tim Esau PO Box 230695 Tigard, OR 97281 CPO 4B 16200 SW Pacific Highway, Suite H242 Tigard, OR 97224 Ross Sundberg 16382 SW 104th Avenue Tigard, OR 97224 Brian Wegener 9830 SW Kimberly Drive Tigard, OR 97224 Joseph Dyar 10285 SW Highland Drive Tigard, OR 97224-4668 Rex Caffall 13205 SW Village Glenn Tigard, OR 97223 John Frewing 7110 SW Lola Lane Tigard, OR 97223 CITY OF TIGARD - SOUTH INTERESTED PARTIES (pg. I of I) (i:\curpin\setup\labels\CIT South.doc) UPDATED: 21-Sep-04 FILE NUMBER: SuB2004-00010 DEZFULLI AUTO SALES TYPE OF NOTICE: NOTICE OF PENDING DECISION REMAILED ON: February 8, 2005 to the forwarding address listed on the yellow "Return To Sender" mail label. RECEIVED PLANNING o m o FEB 0 7 2005 v D CITY OF TI N i- z C� N 07 z Wcz 0000 co x'U 61f 2 < ac, IN) r = m m 4. N _ Iv 0 r.tti Ma DI N M1 4:4 w Nude IODOD m XIMM • mcoOC • CO -q>91 • OX1M4 • O DO(n 0u'< _. m O-:yH C m <m.j z• . mo K xz • 0 . Mµ 1 }� • PI Aµ Z D zo o - .a ▪ 2/ on z 00 0 IA ti 0 VI - r ,� AFFIDAVIT OF MAILING CITYCPnGARD Community(DeveCopment Shaping)1 Better Community , Patricia L. Lunsford, being first duly sworn/affirm, on oath depose and say that I am a Senior Administrative Specialist for the City of7igard Washington County, Oregon and that I served the following: {Check Appropnate Box(s)Below) © NOTICE OF PENDING LAND USE APPLICATION FOR: SDR2004-0001 O/DEIFULLI AUTO SALES AMENDED NOTICE (File No/Name Reference) Z City of Tigard Planning Director A copy of the said notice being hereto attached, marked Exhlblt'A", and by reference made a part hereof, was mailed to each named person(s) at the address(s) shown on the attached list(s), marked Exhibit"R", and by reference made a part hereof, on February 2,2005, and deposited in the United States Mail on February 2,2005, postage prepaid. 7 \,..,,, Vile,(44 (Pers nnttha "•repared Notic: '4 °-.7L STAA1& OT O2 GON ) County of Washington )ss. City of Tigard ) Subscribed and sworn/affirmed before me on the c- day of / ( -Clk.„ , 2005. OFFICIAL SEAL Cie/i9) SUE ROSS NOTARY PU F ORES N I. NOTARY PUBUC-OREGON COMMISSION NO.375152 My Commis io Expires: I 2. 432001 COMMISSION EXPIRES DEC.1,2007 EXHIBIT A NOTICE TO MORTGAGEE, LIENHOLDER,VENDOR OR SELLER: THE TIGARD DEVELOPMENT CODE REQUIRES THAT IF YOU RECEIVE THIS NOTICE,IT SHALL BE PROMPTLY FORWARDED TO THE PURCHASER, NOTICE OF PENDING LAND USE APPLICATION SITE DEVELOPMENT REVIEW CITY OF TIGARD Community Deve1opment Shaping A Better Community DATE OF NOTICE: February 2, 2005 FILE NUMBER: SITE DEVELOPMENT REVIEW (SDR) 2004-00010 Type II Land Use Application FILE NAME: DEZFULLI AUTO SALES PROPOSAL: The applicant is requesting Site Development Review approval to construct a used automobile sales lot with an associated 350 square foot sales office. ZONE: C-G: General Commercial District. The C-G zoning district is designed to accommodate a full range of retail, office and civic uses with a City-wide and even regional trade area. Except where non-conforming, residential uses are limited to single-family residences which are located on the same site as a permitted use. APPLICABLE REVIEW CRITERIA: Community Development Code Chapters 18.360, 18.390, 18.520, 18.705, 18.725, 18.745, 18.755, 18.765, 18.780, 18.790, 18.795 and 18.810. LOCATION: 15280 SW Pacific Highway; WCTM 2S110DB, Tax Lot 1200. YOUR RIGHT TO PROVIDE WRITTEN COMMENTS: Prior to the City making any decision on the Application, you are hereby provided a fourteen (14) day period to submit written comments on the application to the City. THE FOURTEEN (14) DAY PERIOD ENDS AT 5:00 PM ON FEBRUARY 16, 2005. All comments should be directed to Mathew Scheidegger, Associate Planner in the Planning Division at the City of Tigard, 13125 SW Hall Boulevard, Tigard, Oregon 97223. You may reach the City of Tigard by telephone at (503) 639-4171 or by e-mail to matts(o�ci.tigard.or.us. ALL COMMENTS MUST BE RECEIVED BY THE CITY OF TIGARD IN WRITING PRIOR TO 5:00 PM ON THE DATE SPECIFIED ABOVE IN ORDER FOR YOUR COMMENTS TO BE CONSIDERED IN THE DECISION MAKING PROCESS THE CITY OF TIGARD APPRECIATES RECEIVING COMMENTS AND VALUES YOUR INPUT. COMMENTS WILL BE CONSIDERED AND ADDRESSED WITHIN THE NOTICE OF DECISION. A DECISION ON THIS ISSUE IS TENTATIVELY SCHEDULED FOR MARCH 14, 2005. IF YOU PROVIDE COMMENTS, YOU WILL BE SENT A COPY OF THE FULL DECISION ONCE IT HAS BEEN RENDERED. WRITTEN COMMENTS WILL BECOME A PART OF THE PERMANENT PUBLIC RECORD AND SHALL CONTAIN THE FOLLOWING INFORMATION: • Address the specific "Applicable Review Criteria" described in the section above or any other criteria believed to be applicable to this proposal; • Raise any issues and/or concerns believed to be important with sufficient evidence to allow the City to provide a response; • Comments that provide the basis for an appeal to the Tigard Hearings Officer must address the relevant approval criteria with sufficient specificity on that issue. Failure of any party to address the relevant approval criteria with sufficient specificity may preclude subsequent appeals to the Land Use Board of Appeals or Circuit Court on that issue. Specific findings directed at the relevant approval criteria are what constitute relevant evidence. AFTER THE 14 DAY COMMENT PERIOD CLOSES, THE DIRECTOR SHALL ISSUE A TYPE II ADMINISTRATIVE DECISION. THE DIRECTOR'S DECISION SHALL BE MAILED TO THE APPLICANT AND TO OWNERS OF RECORD OF PROPERTY LOCATED WITHIN 500 FEET OF THE SUBJECT SITE, AND TO ANYONE ELSE WHO SUBMITTED WRITTEN COMMENTS OR WHO IS OTHERWISE ENTITLED TO NOTICE. THE DIRECTOR'S DECISION SHALL ADDRESS ALL OF THE RELEVANT APPROVAL CRITERIA. BASED UPON THE CRITERIA AND THE FACTS CONTAINED WITHIN THE RECORD, THE DIRECTOR SHALL APPROVE, APPROVE WITH CONDITIONS OR DENY THE REQUESTED PERMIT OR ACTION. SUMMARY OF THE DECISION-MAKING PROCESS: . The application is accepted by the City . Notice is sent to property owners of record within 500 feet of the proposed development area allowing a 14-day written comment period. . The application is reviewed by City Staff and affected agencies. • City Staff issues a written decision. • Notice of the decision is sent to the Applicant and all owners or contract purchasers of record of the site; all owners of record of property located within 500 feet of the site, as shown on the most recent property tax assessment roll; any City-recognized neighborhood group whose boundaries include the site; and any governmental agency which is entitled to notice under an intergovernmental agreement entered into with the City which includes provision for such notice or anyone who is otherwise entitled to such notice. INFORMATION/EVIDENCE AVAILABLE FOR REVIEW: The application, written comments and supporting documents relied upon by the Director to make this decision are contained within the record and are available for public review at the City of Tigard Community Development Department. Copies of these items may be obtained at a cost of $.25 per page or the current rate charged for this service. Questions regarding this application should be directed to the Planning Staff indicated on the first page of this Notice under the section titled "Your Right to Provide Written Comments. ' ■ . ........................... , 0 VICINITY NAP/ 111/I/h ;04,■Os' ® e e, SDR2004-00010 `.�`. „�� DEZFULLI AUTO SALES .��, g ;140 �.. ® 4 14 6 IIPIS . g ea a Illin B B 8 6 9 B B,,, -� 1P e g B e ® 1 ,....... 1 " ► ♦ B _ g gee �� VO city®a B B 1 I t i i I I r..r..u.rrr.....rr pr OINWIONM B B\ %.wan e 1 w�.m . ON t ., B T� lYtrlc IYr 1.Sf�.4 2S1 1 ODB-90821 2S110CA-80591 r\/��I� ADAMS JOSEPH J CHENOWETH MILDRED H `-,/z\ 15432 SW 114TH CT#82 11545 SW MAJESTIC LN#4 TIGARD,OR 97224 KING CITY,OR 97224 2S1100B-91031 2S1100A-80601 ALDERMAN JOHN M LIVING TRUST COLLIVER WINIFRED R BY ALDERMAN JOHN M TRUSTEE 11545 SW MAJESTIC LANE#3 15373 SW 114TH CT#103 KING CITY,OR 97224 TIGARD, OR 97224 2S110CA-80431 2S11006-90842 ANDERSON CLAUDIA A CONNER VERNA D& 15100 SW CROWN DR#8 HUMPHREY GRETCHEN G TRUSTEES TIGARD, OR 97224 15432 SW 114TH CT#84 TIGARD,OR 97224 2S110CA-80571 2S110DB-91001 BARNA EUGENE A TRUSTEE CURRIE CRAIG H&SHIRLEY A 10606 SW CAPITOL HWY#111 10306 E SILVERTREE CT PORTLAND,OR 97219 SUN LAKES,AZ 85248 2S1100B-90982 2S110CA-80881 BARNETT ANGELA DAVIS JAMES M&ESTALENE A 15435 SW 114TH CT#98 11505 SW TERRA LINDA TIGARD,OR 97224 BEAVERTON,OR 97005 2S110CA-80861 2S110CA-80801 BELLAIRS DON E DENNY ADELE C& 15270 SW CROWN DR#1 STOCKMAN RESI Y& KING CITY,OR 97224 O'DWYER KATHLEEN A 15200 SW CROWN DR#3 KING CITY, OR 97224 2S110CA-80491 2S110CA-00103 BROWN WALTER L&GERALDINE M DENNY PURKEY LLC REVOCABLE TRUST 15350 SW 116TH 15100 SW CROWN DR#2 KING CITY, OR 97224 KING CITY, OR 97224 2S110CA-80561 2S110DB-00301 BURNETT REVOCABLE TRUST DEZFULLI EBRAHIM&SHAHIM BY BURNETT LORETTA C& 12587 SW 133RD AVE COOK ELAINE B TRS TIGARD,OR 97223 11545 SW MAJESTIC LN#7 KING CITY,OR 97224 2S110CA-80471 2S1100B-01200 CAMPBELL MYRTLE M DEZFULLI SHAHIN&EBRAHIM 15100 SW CROWN DR#4 12587 SW 133RD KING CITY,OR 97224 TIGARD,OR 97223 2S110DB-91092 2S110CA-80711 CHAVE P FRANKLIN DOVE BOB N&JANICE E 15371 SW 114TH CT#109 11530 SW MAJESTIC LN#2 TIGARD,OR 97224 KING CITY, OR 97224 2S110CA-80551 2S1100B-00702 DUSEVOIR EUGENE&EVELYN H GMS REALTY LLC 10405 SW DENNEY RD TRLR 59 5973 AVENIDA ENCINAS STE 300 BEAVERTON, OR 97008 CARLSBAD, CA 92008 2S110CA-80751 2S110CA-80741 EDMONSON MIRIAM E GONSALVES ELIZABETH&CARLOS 15215 SW 116TH AVE UNIT#2 15215 SW 116TH AVE#1 PORTLAND,OR 97224 KING CITY,OR 97224 11 0 D B-9000 2S 110CA-80781 F T AT SUMMERFIELD CONDO P GREGG NANCY L OW OF UNITS 15255 SW 116TH UNIT#2 0 KING CITY,OR 97224 110DC-9000 2S110DB-90811 FO T AT SUMMERFIELD CONDO P HAISE MARY GRANT TRUST OW S OF UNITS BY MARY GRANT HAISE TR 0 15432 SW 114TH CT#81 TIGARD,OR 97224 2S110CA-80761 2S110DB-91081 FRANK SHIRLEY A HAMMERSCHMITH HELEM M 15215 SW 116TH#3 15371 SW 114TH CT#108 KING CITY,OR 97224 TIGARD,OR 97224 2S110CA-80441 2S110CA-80701 FRIESEN SUSAN K HANNA ALMA L REV LIV TRUST 15100 SW CROWN DR#7 11530 SW MAJESTIC LN#1 KING CITY, OR 97224 KING CITY,OR 97224 2S1100B-90381 2S110DB-91022 FROST LENA D HARRISON H FAYE 15485 SW 114TH CT UNIT 38 15435 SW 114TH CT#102 TIGARD, OR 97223 TIGARD,OR 97224 2S110DB-90952 2S 110DB-00201 GEORGESON RAYMOND M&FAY M HOLLAND HOLDINGS I ARBOR 15437 SW 114TH#95 HEIGHTS LLC TIGARD, OR 97224 BY CLYDE HOLLAND PARTNERS LLC 1111 MAIN ST STE 710 VANCOUVER,WA 98660 2S110CA-80421 110DB-00200 GILBERT NANCY E TRUSTEE H. •ND HOLDI. S I ARBOR 11480 SW CROWN DR#1 HEIG `S LL KING CITY,OR 97224 BY CLYI' OLLAND PARTNERS LLC 111 PAINS TE710 NCOUVER,WA 98660 2511 0 DC-02200 2S1 10CA-80501 GMC REALTY LLC HOLMAN WILLIAM C 5973 AVENIDA ENCINAS STE 300 HOLMAN SUSAN M CARLSBAD, CA 92008 8040 SW BROADMOOR TERRACE PORTLAND. OR 97225 2S110CA-80811 2S110CA-80821 HURLESS ROBERT W& LATTANZI JOSEPHINE F FOX JOHN M/ELIZABETH A HURLESS MORIN RITA K 15200 SW CROWN DR#2 15200 SW CROWN DRIVE#1 KING CITY,OR 97224 KING CITY,OR 97224 2S110CA-80531 2S1100B-00703 JIMERSON LAURA LUCILE LES SCHWAB TIRE CENTERS OF PORTL 2862 ROSECLIFFE CT#13 STORE ACCOUNTING LAKE OSWEGO,OR 97034 PO BOX 667 PRINEVILLE,OR 97754 2S1 10 D B-00500 2S 110CA-80871 KASCH'S GARDEN&NURSERIES INC LUCAS NEATIN 6566 SE LAKE RD#A 15290 SW CROWN DR#4 MILWAUKIE, OR 97222 KING CITY,OR 97224 2S1 10 D B-90971 2S 110CA-80541 KATZ MARILYN A&STEPHEN A LUNDELL ROBERT G SR 15435 SW 114TH CT#97 11505 SW MAJESTIC LN TIGARD,OR 97224 KING CITY,OR 97224 2S1100B-90991 2S110CA-00100 KESSLER LORRAINE LUTON ROBERT C 15435 SW 114TH#99 do KVERNLAND ERIC B TIGARD,OR 97224 15390 SW 116TH AVE TIGARD,OR 97224 2S 110 DB-90371 2S 110 D B-91102 KINCAID JUANITA LYNCH MARY LOUISE 15485 SW 114TH CT#37 15371 SW 114TH CT#110 TIGARD, OR 97224 TIGARD,OR 97224 2S110CA-00102 2S110CA-80691 KING CITY CITY OF LYNN LARRY J&SHANNON D 15300 SW 116TH 7415 SW EAST LAKE CT KING CITY, OR 97224 WILSONVILLE, OR 97070 2S110CA-01600 2S110CA-80721 KING CITY CIVIC ASSOCIATION MARTIN CARL W&LORRAINE M 15245 SW 116TH 7302 N CHRISTIE DR KING CITY,OR 97223 TUCSON,AZ 85718 10CA-800 25110CA-80911 KIN CONDO UNIT OWNERS MAY JOAN H TRUSTEE 15290 SW CROWN DR#1 KING CITY, OR 97224 10CA-808 4 2S1 10 D B-90362 KIN I CONDOMINIUM MCMULLEN RICHARD D AND OW F UNITS GERTRUDE M TRUSTEES 15485 SW 114TH CT#36 TIGARD,OR 97224 2511006-90442 2S110DB-91041 MESSINGER EDWARD J AND ANN B POLLOW NORMA JEANNE 15483 SW 114TH CT#44 15373 SW 114TH CT#104 TIGARD, OR 97224 TIGARD,OR 97224 2S110DB-90891 2S110DB-90882 MEYER RICHARD J SR PROVINCE LAVELLE 15437 SW 114TH CT#89 15430 SW 114TH CT#88 TIGARD, OR 97224 TIGARD,OR 97224 2S110CA-80731 2S110CA-80511 MILLER PATRICIA RAY ROBERT W&MARY E 11530 SW MAJESTIC LN#4 11505 SW MAJESTIC LN 809-5 TIGARD, OR 97223 KING CITY,OR 97224 2S110CA-80831 2S110CA-80851 MOORE ELEANOR M RICKNER RICHARD H&JUDI A 15270 SW CROWN DR#4 13500 SW PACIFIC HWY KING CITY,OR 97224 PMB 136 TIGARD,OR 97223 2S 110 D B-90901 2S 110CA-80791 O'KEEFFE LIVING TRUST THE ROGERS WILLIAM L BY ARTHUR F JRNIRGINIA O'KEEFFE TR 2155 SW 75TH AVE 15437 SW 114TH CT#90 PORTLAND,OR 97225 TIGARD, OR 97224 2S110DB-01300 2S1100B-90962 PARR-FRANKLIN LLC RYAN THOMAS E REVOCABLE TRUST& 1300 SW 5TH#2815 RYAN JOAN M REVOCABLE TRUST PORTLAND,OR 97201 15518 SW 114TH CT#57 TIGARD,OR 97224 2S1 10CA-80901 2S1 10 D B-90392 PETERSEN GENE M& SCHENK SOPHIA M SMITH-PETERSON PAULA M 15485 SW 114TH CT#39 15290 SW CROWN DR#3 TIGARD,OR 97224 KING CITY, OR 97224 2 S 1100 B-90931 2S1 10 D B-91071 PICKETT GEORGE E& SCHOUWEILER ALLYN H&JOAN C THELMA E CO-TRUSTEES 15371 SW 114TH CT#107 15437 SW 114TH CT TIGARD,OR 97224 TIGARD,OR 97224 2S 110CA-80581 2S 110CA-80771 PINKER SHIRLEY JEAN SCHULER PEARL J 11545 SW MAJESTIC LN#5 15255 SW 116TH AVE#1 TIGARD,OR 97224 KING CITY,OR 97224 2S110CA-80451 2S1100B-90912 PIO BARBARA J TRUSTEE SCOTT JOSEPH V&BEVERLY J 15100 SW CROWN DR#6 15437 SW 114TH CT#91 KING CITY, OR 97224 TIGARD,OR 97224 2S110CA-80621 2S110CA-80461 SHEVCHENKO EDITH U WALKER GORDON V& 11545 SW MAJESTIC LN#1 WALKER SUSAN B KING CITY, OR 97224 13900 SW 115TH TIGARD,OR 97223 2S110DB-91052 2S110CA-80611 SKYHAR WILLIAM&GENEVIEVE R TR WARD MAVIS H 15373 SW 114TH CT#105 11545 SW MAJESTIC LN#2 TIGARD, OR 97224 KING CITY,OR 97224 2S110DB-90351 2S110DB-00704 SPRECHER PAUL&DOLORIS P REVOC WASHINGTON FEDERAL SAVINGS BY SPRECHER PAUL&DOLORIS P TRS ACCOUNTING DEPT BR 118 15485 SW 114TH CT#35 425 PIKE ST TIGARD, OR 97224 SEATTLE,WA 98101 2S 110D B-91012 2S 110CA-80481 SPYKER ELINA TRUSTEE WEBER MABEL L SZALOBRYT JANE C TRUSTEE 15100 SW CROWN DR#3 15435 SW 114TH CT#101 KING CITY,OR 97224 TIGARD, OR 97224 2S11006-91062 2S1100B-90941 SZEPESI LESLIE L&MICHELE K WEEDMAN WENDY SUE 10321 LAKE DR SE 15437 SW 114TH CT#94 SALEM, OR 97306 TIGARD,OR 97224 2S110CA-80411 2S110CA-80841 THAYER CAROYLE J WIESE YVONNE H 442 50TH AVE NW 15270 SW CROWN DR#2 SALEM, OR 97304 KING CITY,OR 97224 2S 110DB-00300 2S1100B-90922 TIGARD COVENANT CHURCH WILSON PHYLLIS A 11321 SW NAEVE ST 15437 SW 114TH CT#92 TIGARD, OR 97224 TIGARD,OR 97224 2S1100B-90402 2S1100A-80521 TILLINGHAST RUTH P TRUSTEE WORKMAN MARY MARIE& 15485 SW 114TH#40 WORKMAN JUDY TIGARD, OR 97224 11505 SW MAJESTIC LN#4 PORTLAND,OR 97224 2S110DB-90832 2S110DB-90861 TRACY SHARON M YODER JOSEPH H 15432 SW 114TH CT#83 PMB 504 TIGARD, OR 97224 15532 SW PACIFIC HWY#C18 TIGARD,OR 97224 2S110CA-80681 TUPPER RICHARD C& FLORENCE M 11520 SW MAJESTIC LN#2 TIGARD, OR 97223 Josh Thomas 10395 SW Bonanza Tigard, OR 97224 Kristen Miller 8940 SW Edgewood Street Tigard, OR 97223 Paul Owen 10335 SW Highland Drive Tigard, OR 97224 Tim Esau PO Box 230695 Tigard, OR 97281 CPO 4B 16200 SW Pacific Highway, Suite H242 Tigard, OR 97224 Ross Sundberg 16382 SW 104th Avenue Tigard, OR 97224 Brian Wegener 9830 SW Kimberly Drive Tigard, OR 97224 Joseph Dyar 10285 SW Highland Drive Tigard, OR 97224-4668 Rex Caffall 13205 SW Village Glenn Tigard, OR 97223 John Frewing 7110 SW Lola Lane Tigard, OR 97223 CITY OF TIGARD - SOUTH INTERESTED PARTIES (pg. I of I) (i:lcurpin\setup\labels\CIT South.doc) UPDATED: 21-Sep-04 f ■ / CITY of TIGARD GEOGRAPNiC INFORMATION SYSTEM 0" pOQ 0 0 / 3 AREA NOTIFIED , , s •'app �6[l� (500') 0000 X00 , °°° . �4J� un�wx x'�rax s. � N� ;``' ' .� FOR: Ebrahim Dezfulli �� * < s '�,, mfr - RE: 2S1 I DDB, 1 200 11P1111*# minuses �`r `��` Property owner information is valid for 3 months from iii .„,0 the date printed on this map. 7rxxle f� Qj m altt®x1 s,, asnaosoisoo xt7RAt� 7 m^* � F- rs►urmrn ms sa °sntlrurles J 7xxtytr�n7s1177sxsooFxxsfi� _°_��` mtMdxn rtllrerx0l 0 0 0 0 0 o °°°° 41 sit I f �O mtMS1 ° °0 0 0°o INI rn o 1== ° °o° . °°°° °°0 ° ii ‘ti OO°° 0 O ° ■•pOK° 0= O rsnooconuu ° V ° :, L.� �•� . N 000■ • • ` o 200 400 000 . 40. 1ti•405 test I= ° . o G7 °° A�. 11,E lip I� City of Tigard 0 4 ' = ma* war Iii, .,, Information on this map is for general location only and should be verified with the Development Services Division.13725 SW Hall Blvd Tigard,OR 97223 •. /�/O , I. , (503)639-4171 ,. n. / http://www.ci.tipsrd.or.us Community Development Plot date:Jan 12,2005;C:lmagic\MAGIC03.APR 2S110DB-90821 2S110CA-80591 ADAMS JOSEPH J CHENOWETH MILDRED H 15432 SW 114TH CT#82 11545 SW MAJESTIC LN#4 TIGARD, OR 97224 KING CITY,OR 97224 2S1 10 D B-91031 2S1 10CA-80601 ALDERMAN JOHN M LIVING TRUST COLLIVER WINIFRED R BY ALDERMAN JOHN M TRUSTEE 11545 SW MAJESTIC LANE#3 15373 SW 114TH CT#103 KING CITY, OR 97224 TIGARD, OR 97224 2S110CA-80431 2S110DB-90842 ANDERSON CLAUDIA A CONNER VERNA D& 15100 SW CROWN DR#8 HUMPHREY GRETCHEN G TRUSTEES TIGARD, OR 97224 15432 SW 114TH CT#84 TIGARD,OR 97224 2S110CA-80571 2S110DB-91001 BARNA EUGENE A TRUSTEE CURRIE CRAIG H&SHIRLEY A 10606 SW CAPITOL HWY#111 10306 E SILVERTREE CT PORTLAND, OR 97219 SUN LAKES,AZ 85248 2S1 10 D B-90982 2S 110CA-80881 BARNETT ANGELA DAVIS JAMES M& ESTALENE A 15435 SW 114TH CT#98 11505 SW TERRA LINDA TIGARD, OR 97224 BEAVERTON, OR 97005 2S110CA-80861 2S110CA-80801 BELLAIRS DON E DENNY ADELE C& 15270 SW CROWN DR#1 STOCKMAN RESI Y& KING CITY,OR 97224 O'DWYER KATHLEEN A 15200 SW CROWN DR#3 KING CITY,OR 97224 2S1100A-80491 2S110CA-00103 BROWN WALTER L&GERALDINE M DENNY PURKEY LLC REVOCABLE TRUST 15350 SW 116TH 15100 SW CROWN DR#2 KING CITY, OR 97224 KING CITY,OR 97224 2S110CA-80561 2S110DB-00301 BURNETT REVOCABLE TRUST DEZFULLI EBRAHIM&SHAHIM BY BURNETT LORETTA C& 12587 SW 133RD AVE COOK ELAINE B TRS TIGARD.OR 97223 11545 SW MAJESTIC LN#7 KING CITY,OR 97224 2S1100A-80471 2S110DB-01200 CAMPBELL MYRTLE M DEZFULLI SHAHIN&EBRAHIM 15100 SW CROWN DR#4 12587 SW 133RD KING CITY,OR 97224 TIGARD,OR 97223 2S110DB-91092 2S110CA-80711 CHAVE P FRANKLIN DOVE BOB N&JANICE E 15371 SW 114TH CT#109 11530 SW MAJESTIC LN#2 TIGARD, OR 97224 KING CITY, OR 97224 2S110CA-80551 2S110DB-00702 DUSEVOIR EUGENE&EVELYN H GMS REALTY LLC 10405 SW DENNEY RD TRLR 59 5973 AVENIDA ENCINAS STE 300 BEAVERTON, OR 97008 CARLSBAD, CA 92008 2S110CA-80751 2S110CA-80741 EDMONSON MIRIAM E GONSALVES ELIZABETH&CARLOS 15215 SW 116TH AVE UNIT#2 15215 SW 116TH AVE#1 PORTLAND, OR 97224 KING CITY,OR 97224 11 0 D B-9000 2S1 10CA-80781 F T AT SUMMERFIELD CONDO P GREGG NANCY L OW OF UNITS 15255 SW 116TH UNIT#2 0 KING CITY,OR 97224 1100C-9000 2S110DB-90811 FO T AT SUMMERFIELD CONDO P HAISE MARY GRANT TRUST OW S OF UNITS BY MARY GRANT HAISE TR 0 15432 SW 114TH CT#81 TIGARD,OR 97224 2S110CA-80761 2S110DB-91081 FRANK SHIRLEY A HAMMERSCHMITH HELEM M 15215 SW 116TH#3 15371 SW 114TH CT#108 KING CITY, OR 97224 TIGARD,OR 97224 2S110CA-80441 2S110CA-80701 FRIESEN SUSAN K HANNA ALMA L REV LIV TRUST 15100 SW CROWN DR#7 11530 SW MAJESTIC LN#1 KING CITY,OR 97224 KING CITY,OR 97224 2S1 10 D B-90381 2S 110 DB-91022 FROST LENA D HARRISON H FAYE 15485 SW 114TH CT UNIT 38 15435 SW 114TH CT#102 TIGARD,OR 97223 TIGARD,OR 97224 2S1 10 D B-90952 2S1 10 D B-00201 GEORGESON RAYMOND M& FAY M HOLLAND HOLDINGS I ARBOR 15437 SW 114TH#95 HEIGHTS LLC TIGARD, OR 97224 BY CLYDE HOLLAND PARTNERS LLC 1111 MAIN ST STE 710 VANCOUVER,WA 98660 2S1 10 CA-80421 1 10 D B-00200 GILBERT NANCY E TRUSTEE HO. AND HOLD', S I ARBOR 11480 SW CROWN DR#1 HEIG •S LL KING CITY, OR 97224 BY CLYI• OLLAND PARTNERS LLC 111 VAIN S TE 710 •NCOUVER.WA 98660 2S110DC-02200 2S110CA-80501 GMC REALTY LLC HOLMAN WILLIAM C 5973 AVENIDA ENCINAS STE 300 HOLMAN SUSAN M CARLSBAD, CA 92008 8040 SW BROADMOOR TERRACE PORTLAND,OR 97225 2S110CA-80811 2S110CA-80821 HURLESS ROBERT W& LATTANZI JOSEPHINE F FOX JOHN M/ELIZABETH A HURLESS MORIN RITA K 15200 SW CROWN DR#2 15200 SW CROWN DRIVE#1 KING CITY,OR 97224 KING CITY,OR 97224 2S110CA-80531 2S1100B-00703 JIMERSON LAURA LUCILE LES SCHWAB TIRE CENTERS OF PORTL 2862 ROSECLIFFE CT#13 STORE ACCOUNTING LAKE OSWEGO, OR 97034 PO BOX 667 PRINEVILLE,OR 97754 2S110DB-00500 2S110CA-80871 KASCH'S GARDEN&NURSERIES INC LUCAS NEATIN 6566 SE LAKE RD#A 15290 SW CROWN DR#4 MILWAUKIE,OR 97222 KING CITY,OR 97224 2S110DB-90971 2S110CA-80541 KATZ MARILYN A&STEPHEN A LUNDELL ROBERT G SR 15435 SW 114TH CT#97 11505 SW MAJESTIC LN TIGARD, OR 97224 KING CITY,OR 97224 2S110DB-90991 2S110CA-00100 KESSLER LORRAINE LUTON ROBERT C 15435 SW 114TH#99 c/o KVERNLAND ERIC B TIGARD,OR 97224 15390 SW 116TH AVE TIGARD,OR 97224 2S1100B-90371 2S110DB-91102 KINCAID JUANITA LYNCH MARY LOUISE 15485 SW 114TH CT#37 15371 SW 114TH CT#110 TIGARD,OR 97224 TIGARD,OR 97224 2S110CA-00102 2S110CA-80691 KING CITY CITY OF LYNN LARRY J&SHANNON D 15300 SW 116TH 7415 SW EAST LAKE CT KING CITY,OR 97224 WILSONVILLE,OR 97070 2S110CA-01600 2S110CA-80721 KING CITY CIVIC ASSOCIATION MARTIN CARL W&LORRAINE M 15245 SW 116TH 7302 N CHRISTIE DR KING CITY,OR 97223 TUCSON,AZ 85718 10CA-800 2S110CA-80911 KIN CONDO UNIT OWNERS MAY JOAN H TRUSTEE 15290 SW CROWN DR#1 KING CITY,OR 97224 10CA-808 1 2S110DB-90362 KIN I CONDOMINIUM MCMULLEN RICHARD D AND OW F UNITS GERTRUDE M TRUSTEES 15485 SW 114TH CT#36 TIGARD,OR 97224 2S1 10DB-90442 2S110DB-91041 MESSINGER EDWARD J AND ANN B POLLOW NORMA JEANNE 15483 SW 114TH CT#44 15373 SW 114TH CT#104 TIGARD, OR 97224 TIGARD,OR 97224 2S110DB-90891 2S110DB-90882 MEYER RICHARD J SR PROVINCE LAVELLE 15437 SW 114TH CT#89 15430 SW 114TH CT#88 TIGARD, OR 97224 TIGARD,OR 97224 2S110CA-80731 2S110CA-80511 MILLER PATRICIA RAY ROBERT W&MARY E 11530 SW MAJESTIC LN#4 11505 SW MAJESTIC LN 809-5 TIGARD, OR 97223 KING CITY,OR 97224 2S110CA-80831 2S110CA-80851 MOORE ELEANOR M RICKNER RICHARD H&JUDI A 15270 SW CROWN DR#4 13500 SW PACIFIC HWY KING CITY,OR 97224 PMB 136 TIGARD,OR 97223 2S110DB-90901 2S110CA-80791 O'KEEFFE LIVING TRUST THE ROGERS WILLIAM L BY ARTHUR F JRNIRGINIA O'KEEFFE TR 2155 SW 75TH AVE 15437 SW 114TH CT#90 PORTLAND,OR 97225 TIGARD, OR 97224 2S1 10 DB-01300 2S1 10 D B-90962 PARR-FRANKLIN LLC RYAN THOMAS E REVOCABLE TRUST& 1300 SW 5TH#2815 RYAN JOAN M REVOCABLE TRUST PORTLAND, OR 97201 15518 SW 114TH CT#57 TIGARD, OR 97224 2S1 10CA-80901 2S110DB-90392 PETERSEN GENE M& SCHENK SOPHIA M SMITH-PETERSON PAULA M 15485 SW 114TH CT#39 15290 SW CROWN DR#3 TIGARD,OR 97224 KING CITY, OR 97224 2S110DB-90931 2S110DB-91071 PICKETT GEORGE E& SCHOUWEILER ALLYN H&JOAN C THELMA E CO-TRUSTEES 15371 SW 114TH CT#107 15437 SW 114TH CT TIGARD,OR 97224 TIGARD, OR 97224 2S110CA-80581 2S110CA-80771 PINKER SHIRLEY JEAN SCHULER PEARL J 11545 SW MAJESTIC LN#5 15255 SW 116TH AVE#1 TIGARD,OR 97224 KING CITY, OR 97224 2S110CA-80451 2S110DB-90912 PIO BARBARA J TRUSTEE SCOTT JOSEPH V& BEVERLY J 15100 SW CROWN DR#6 15437 SW 114TH CT#91 KING CITY, OR 97224 TIGARD, OR 97224 2S110CA-80621 2S110CA-80461 SHEVCHENKO EDITH U WALKER GORDON V& 11545 SW MAJESTIC LN#1 WALKER SUSAN B KING CITY, OR 97224 13900 SW 115TH TIGARD,OR 97223 2S 110DB-91052 2S110CA-80611 SKYHAR WILLIAM&GENEVIEVE R TR WARD MAVIS H 15373 SW 114TH CT#105 11545 SW MAJESTIC LN#2 TIGARD,OR 97224 KING CITY, OR 97224 2S110DB-90351 2S110DB-00704 SPRECHER PAUL&DOLORIS P REVOC WASHINGTON FEDERAL SAVINGS BY SPRECHER PAUL&DOLORIS P TRS ACCOUNTING DEPT BR 118 15485 SW 114TH CT#35 425 PIKE ST TIGARD,OR 97224 SEATTLE,WA 98101 2S11008-91012 2S110CA-80481 SPYKER ELINA TRUSTEE WEBER MABEL L SZALOBRYT JANE C TRUSTEE 15100 SW CROWN DR#3 15435 SW 114TH CT#101 KING CITY,OR 97224 TIGARD, OR 97224 2S1 10 D B-91062 2S1 10 D B-90941 SZEPESI LESLIE L&MICHELE K WEEDMAN WENDY SUE 10321 LAKE DR SE 15437 SW 114TH CT#94 SALEM,OR 97306 TIGARD,OR 97224 2S110CA-80411 2S110CA-80841 THAYER CAROYLE J WIESE YVONNE H 442 50TH AVE NW 15270 SW CROWN DR#2 SALEM,OR 97304 KING CITY, OR 97224 2S1 10 D B-00300 2S1 10 D B-90922 TIGARD COVENANT CHURCH WILSON PHYLLIS A 11321 SW NAEVE ST 15437 SW 114TH CT#92 TIGARD,OR 97224 TIGARD, OR 97224 2S110DB-90402 2S110CA-80521 TILLINGHAST RUTH P TRUSTEE WORKMAN MARY MARIE& 15485 SW 114TH#40 WORKMAN JUDY TIGARD, OR 97224 11505 SW MAJESTIC LN#4 PORTLAND, OR 97224 2S110DB-90832 2S110DB-90861 TRACY SHARON M YODER JOSEPH H 15432 SW 114TH CT#83 PMB 504 TIGARD, OR 97224 15532 SW PACIFIC HWY#C18 TIGARD,OR 97224 2S110CA-80681 TUPPER RICHARD C& FLORENCE M 11520 SW MAJESTIC LN#2 TIGARD, OR 97223 Josh Thomas 10395 SW Bonanza Tigard, OR 97224 Kristen Miller 8940 SW Edgewood Street Tigard, OR 97223 Paul Owen 10335 SW Highland Drive Tigard, OR 97224 Tim Esau PO Box 230695 Tigard, OR 97281 CPO 4B 16200 SW Pacific Highway, Suite H242 Tigard, OR 97224 Ross Sundberg 16382 SW 104th Avenue Tigard, OR 97224 Brian Wegener 9830 SW Kimberly Drive Tigard, OR 97224 Joseph Dyar 10285 SW Highland Drive Tigard, OR 97224-4668 Rex Caffall 13205 SW Village Glenn Tigard, OR 97223 John Frewing 7110 SW Lola Lane Tigard, OR 97223 CITY OF TIGARD - SOUTH INTERESTED PARTIES (pg. I of I) (i:\curpin\setup\labels\CIT South.doc) UPDATED: 21-Sep-04 CITY OF TIGARD COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT 4,4 PLANNING DIVISION OFTI I 13125 SW HALL BOULEVARD CITY TY OF TIGARD TIGARD, OREGON 91223 Community(Development PHONE: 503-639-4171 FAX: 503-684-7297 (Attn: Patty/Planning) Shaping Better Community G°3�Q�JC pc)12 5OO. 1 le 4IT OVINE MAIIR k..E1 Property owner information is valid for 3 months from the date of your request INDICATE ALL PROJECT MAP & TAX LOT NUMBERS (i.e. 1S134AB, Tax Lot 00100) OR THE ADDRESSES FOR ALL PROJECT PARCELS BELOW: Q> r z etteo i 5 2 S "SL„,, .e_ }-{ M-do /. ) - Z.S I(aJ t PLEASE BE AWARE THAT ONLY 1 SET OF LABELS WILL BE PROVIDED AT THIS TIME FOR HOLDING YOUR NEIGHBORHOOD MEETING. After submitting your land use application to the City, and the project planner has reviewed your application for completeness, you will be notified by means of an incomplete etter to obtain your 2 final sets of labels. T 2 final sets g labels need to be placed on envelopes with first class letter-rate postage on the —tt en elo esjn form of postage stamps (no metered envelopes and no return address) and resu ed to the City. for the purpose of providing notice to 'Property owners of the proposed land use application and the decision. The 2 sets of envelopes must be .<ept separate. The person listed below will be called to pick up and pay for the labels when they are ready. NAME OF CONTACT PERSON: I ba_h; <1 -.. //,- PHONE: 5o S - Z t 7 - 3z (s?2 FAX: This request may be mailed, faxed or hand delivered to the City of Tigard. Please allow a 2-day minimum for processing requests. Upon completion of your request, the contact person will be called to pick up their request that will be placed in "Will Cali' by their last name, at the Community Development Reception Desk. The cost of processing your request must be paid at the time of pick up, as exact cost can not be pre-determined. PLEASE NOTE: FOR REASONS OF ACCURACY, ONLY ORIGINAL MAILING LABELS PROVIDED BY THE CITY VS. RE-TYPED MAILING LABELS WILL BE ACCEPTED. Cost Description: $11 to generate the mailing list, plus$2 per sheet for printing the list onto labels(20 addresses per sheet). Then, multiply the cost to print one set of labels by the number of sets requested. *EXAMPLE` 'COST FOR THIS REQUEST ** 4 sheets of labels x$2/sheet=$8.00 x 2 sets= $16.00 ,.. sheet(s)of labels x$2/sheet=$/0 x sets= Ze'_C`> 2 sheets of labels x$2/sheet for interested parties x 2 sets= $ 4.00 L sheet(s)of labels x$2/sheet for interested parties=$ a x / _ 72— GENERATE LIST = $1110 GENERATE LIST = TOTAL = $31.00 TOTAL = g CITY OF TIGARD 1/13/2005 13125 SW Ha11 Blvd. 10:50:31AM *.:.y/,11, Tigard,Oregon 97223 -1.1 (503) 63 9-417 1 Receipt #: 27200500000000000181 Date: 01/13/2005 Line Items: Case No Tran Code Description Revenue Account No Amount Paid MISC Miscellaneous Fees&Charges-33.0000 @$1.0000 100-0000-451000 33.00 Line Item Total: $33.00 Payments: Method Payer User ID Acct./Check Approval No. How Received Amount Paid Cash EBRAHIM DEZFULLI KJP In Person 50.00 Change CITY OF TIGARD KJP In Person (17.00) Payment Total: $33.00 cReceipt.rpt Page 1 of 1 PRE APP.HELD BY: CITY OF TIGARD PLANNING DIVISION 13125 SW HALL BOULEVARD TIGARD, OR 97223-8189 siIG6w*i 503.639.4171/503.684.7297 CITY OF TIGARD OREGON LAND USE PERMIT APPLICATION File # 5dIrZUDV-1-(1)0/0 Other Case #, Pit- C.1)(4 " 030( j Date 17,40t1 By -�� Receipt# .2.0e`i-i3 3k City EZUrb Date Complete TYPE OF PERMIT YOU ARE APPLYING FOR ] Adjustment/Variance (I or II) ❑ Minor Land Partition (II) ❑ Zone Change (III) ] Comprehensive Plan Amendment (IV) ❑ Planned Development (III) ❑ Zone Change Annexation (IV) ] Conditional Use (III) ❑ Sensitive Lands Review (I, II or III) ❑ Zone Ordinance Amendment (IV) ] Historic Overlay (II or III) ❑ Site Development Review (II) ] Home Occupation (II) ❑ Subdivision (II or III) .00A1IUN WHERE PROPOSED AC[IVITY-WILL OCCUR(Address it available) ! 5,2S S PAC c 1-1 W7 AX MAP& AX LO I NUS. c/fo1g _ CI200 I U[AL Sf I E SIZE ZONING CLASSIFICA1 ION %PPLICAN r' _ NAILING ADDRESS/CI I Y/S1 ATE/ZIP ia5 E7 • W J 33A v& 7-1 CAA /D / c� j�C ' 97 -1H NE NO. FAX O. � � � � y- o. .6PtFfla''1- 17C2��1 �-� (A-60 •' 63) 7 - 3 LeZ e6-LC 'ROPER I Y OWNER/DEED HOLDER(Attach list if more than one) e /A S /I47f7 AI (1) MAILING ADDRESS/CI FY/S 1 Al E/ZIP 3k2 2 / / G0h(» ( • 2Z g 6-4 6-7-3Z 62- y - 3 (13.? When -- -owner and the applicant are different people, the applica t must be pap purchaser of record or a lessee in possession with written authorization from the owner or an agent of the owner. Theners must sign this application in the space provided on the back of this form or submit a written authorization with this application. PROPOSAL SUMMARY(Please be specific) APPLICATIONS WILL NOT BE ACCEPTED WITHOUT ALL OF THE REQUIRED SUBMITTAL ELEMENTS AS DESCRIBED IN THE "BASIC SUBMITTAL REQUIREMENTS" INFORMATION SHEET. 2. THE APPLICANT SHALL CERTIFY THAT: ♦ If the application is granted, the applicant shall exercise the rights granted in accordance with the terms and subject to all the conditions and limitations of the approval. • All the above statements and the statements in the plot plan, attachments, and exhibits transmitted herewith, are true; and the applicants so acknowledge that any permit issued, based on this application, map be revoked if it is found that any such statements are false. • The applicant has read the entire contents of the application, including the policies and criteria, and understands the requirements for approving or denying the application(s). SIGNATURES OF EACH OWNER OF THE SUBJECT PROPERTY ARE REQUIRED. w 7- /2 - D `.( Owner's Signature Date 51,..0\0\ p --065fuc -712 '6 ct Owner's Signature Date Owner's Signature Date Owner's Signature Date Owner's Signature Date Applicant/Agent/Representative's Signature Date Applicant/Agent/Representative's Signature Date c� CITY OF TIGARD 7/22/2004 13125 SW Hall Blvd. 3:52:26PM .�i�.;, Tigard,Oregon 97223 ..�� 1. (503) 63 9-417 1 t Receipt #: 27200400000000003236 Date: 07/22/2004 Line Items: Case No Tran Code Description Revenue Account No Amount Paid SDR2004-00010 [LANDUS] Site Development Rev 100-0000-438000 3,536.00 Line Item Total: $3,536.00 Payments: Method Payer User ID Acct./Check Approval No. How Received Amount P:,._ Check EBRAHIM K DEZFULLI KJP 2221 In Person 3,536.00 Payment Total: $3,536.00 i � 4� ti , t 5 if,y i.�: lit fr- 9 i' it ��' j '� j�, r r c is ~ do g �` 6Y { ✓ .y�.1,;,..:...-,,, , ' 4 40 ms � ` # ' S4 ~ ,� S XT ti }ry . 9 tf �'� 1 ., d r XIi At',W: p r �� ce r 6 ,p q s .44 Y a' `■ vw, 'lxt 4.,x+44 ti Aj.i.„ v'1ti ��,. •. �T�; <r y ,'t STATUTORY WARRANTY DEED • • chi ({ t'a D i �." ;E }'�`' .I ROS$RT LUT��Nic�; ie'i ,,f _ =, •Grantor, '44%•••"%• • .'�I;' :;•'' convey errdwamnta. �HA!1t DEZFULLI AND 4BAP iIN! DEZFU1LI. rife and ht,�6a�d 5, K,t1 Grantee, • , _ r rho for!*watts Cescrl+xxi real property free of lime and encumbrances,except as apxificoily act forth herein: `" �. PAACBL 1, PARTITION PLAT NO. 1996-010, IN THP. CITY OF TICARD, COUNT] OF e-`- •t �� -, 4`• WASHINGTON AND STATE OF OREGON. }_ " z .i'4' °. •�. rte. Igt 1 I -7,,,. r •rtv , 'e `y,' 1 This property is free of lie=and etmtmbrtn:ea,EXCEPT: COVENANTS, CONDITIONS, RESTRICTIONS .'•+-•'lr.-'5 ..-.• 14 r ~*?ir' ' AND EASEKENTS OF RECORD. --Zr r ..e.T 1L ca"--;4.,•r fo L. µ S,. 6 �j� 4lam �j�. •t �� —i—as • THIS INSTRUMENT WILL NOT ALLOW USE OF THE PROPERTY DESCRIBED IN THIS INSTRUMENT IN ',,;rte :ti ';f• �Irr'a " t'`}• VIOLATION OF APPLICABLE LAND USE LAWS AND REGULATIONS. BEFORE SIGNING OR ACCEPTING e C.'.74.,. .r%'�„ y r' THIS INSTRUMENT, THE PERSON ACQUIRING FEE TITLE TO THE PROPERTY SHOULD CHECK WITH ; . Y r .!`1var THE APPROPRIATE CITY OR COUNTY PLANNING DEPARTMENT TO VERIFY APPROVED USES AND TO ;G�:�. •.a .,r->i 'WV-% DETERMINE ANY LIMITS ON LAWSUITS AGAINST FARMING OR FOREST PRACTICES AS DEFINED IN d - �j�- •�4` ORS 30.930. c �r Y r°'"ter' ' The true consideration for this con�'eyzace is S 320.000.00 (Hem comply with the requ re�nu of ORS 93.030) '�*ry: 1 WHICH IS PAID TO AND PAID BY AN ACCOMODATOR AS PART OF A 1031 DEFERRED EXCHANGE "P.9 Xr• _ r.." Dated this i-7 d'y of V .. 9 °/T ..rr r 1Ya3ffi?&TOH CLTJNTY i• tag, f�4,4. },` P•11• `°u 4 REAL f'AGN£7TP TRWSfER Tat f; ...1.1.'y" .--1.Z. : t��i.i�C jai,'` FEE KID DATE � Yt C R ert Luton m� ' fly;tZ .�+•1�•+ . -•r; 3•-'.c1r e, r 'Seex ' - ' 'r : ``= i `Y '" . _ �7� ST ATE OF OREGON - ,, ".• •7'} = r• County of WASHINGTON }ss. s 4- 'a�:S '�w✓(��a'G �y�•p 'f 4.41 BE IT REh1FMB1~RFIJ, Thar on this d o i 1 of , h 41.,1•5'1.r ✓ ay f rr 19 , b ore me, :he 1: f.. t • r Y44 .:�'.1 undersigned,a Notary Public in and for said County dd State,personally appeared the wIthin named L 7•v f4 ....-+►yF',t`' ROBERT LUTON • :tr? i fi e 3: '��«xL ,may"�`�{� •;. �,�. ...:4?.. jf+: ,;z..,s,G known to me to be the identical individual—described in and who executed the within ins:rumens and acknowledged to �4 -'rej'v tiCi i7re . me that HE executed the same freely and voluntarily. +fie ,4.7 'e, IN TESTIMONY WHEREOF, I have hereunto sot my hand and affixed my official seal the day and year last above "�"rra• t� 1 .,.,• A 1::i likrili- written. zr.?S.` • L!1i�3`te ' ! .cum _ : 1rr•1y. i.. : M OFFi(.:raL$Fah .y .a' jY/ a•a,�.� . a*:' f�!.(UT Y,,,'S ;7�'�' 7c PT lA4FAOkt iCNUBERT ti 'rota jti. oar O:e;an. A�,z^. •"� 9A_T;; :Y0.&;„ rJN MMISIIIONNO.0.vea3 i i.1 .:w.,j1i /› L.....1.0 C..IL.ILeION 1.r.►IF{C 09C.19,tf�j) I +' .e. tom • , t 821191 ;'�.',_ �,r.'� Title Order No. _ 00'�[•`v.:14:; ��w No, 97050783 THIS SPACE RESERVED FOR P.ECOPDER'S USE y t�� }? £:ter-tom F/t •i,y10"A• AN•1••. /cta:rox-?_•p reran to: 4!7 ��: • .. shtihin D4zfulli . : , rt ;; ;r f 12511 ri 133Tu , • ��•ti:';. s ..+ TSB 01 9722) + ,; ••'iY � r! ' Nan*,14drasc,Bp E , i ?.0 lk,t.a dw{7a h ra3u,raii eA ti s atament mt.M bt sent OIL:∎'• 1 �a/1} � r i Al Ua k/b.ht b3 1*O& �?Y' .'tat S,rrihfr IL J35lli tlia rf=%=9.. !y� .%�.:; w '' � 11557 511 T 33r i •r1144-' -.41/6". - t,. r0 qt •1._ ,rsr :•:�•7•art.'Z• r•9r r.[a``ar 731�JV1S6�iCJ lY_�ri�:'��i..f�'IrTts'-it}�;L%`nU:.��./�5�.?A.IJ:F;f.RYTlT.1d3iYDlQtl'LT.�Y�.w •f•S�LT.'77'+��%.:r,l�'S;ti.4� R -1 r'- iv Wash' County,Oregon 2004-010066 5 02/0 ,02:19:58 PM ,,d fGX <<t �''13 D-0Q Cnt■1 Stn■21 RECORDSI DEZFULLI, EBRAHIM $5.00$6.00$11.00•Total z$22.00 DEZFULLI, SHAHIM III II 12587 SW 133RD AVE 111111111 I IIII I TIGARD,OR 97223 QUIT CLAIM DEED 00526531200400100660010017 I,Jerry Hanson,Director of A mart and Taxation and Ex-Officio County Clerk for Washington County, ..„:,.,.�. , Made this 21- of�6t.r1�w1'j ,2004 between Oregon,do hereby certify that the within Instrument of _ . '.i writing wee received and recorded In the book of K , records of said county. strw. .' ,. THE GRANTOR Jerry R.Hanson,Director $easement and Taxation, htyYf"' TIGARD COVENANT CHURCH,an Oregon non profit corporation Ex-Officio County Clerk for in in consideration of the sum of TWO THOUSAND FIVE HUNDRED AND NO/100 DOLLARS($2,500.00) in hand paid,the Recipt of which is hereby acknowledged Conveys and quit claims to EBRAHIM DEZFULLI AND SHAHIM DEZFULLI,husband and wife as joint tenants with right of survivorship the following described real estate situated in the County of Washington and State of Oregon, together with all after acquired title of the grantor(s)therein: ONLY THOSE PORTIONS LYING SOUTH OF NAEVE ROAD OF THE FOLLOWING TRACT OF LAND: LOT 9,WILLOW BROOK FARM,EXCEPT THAT PORTION THEREOF CONVEYED TO THE STATE OF OREGON BY DEED RECORDED MARCH 11, 1931 IN BOOK 146,PAGE 423,IN THE CITY OF TIGARD, COUNTY OF WASHINGTON,STATE OF OREGON. GRANTOR TIGARD COVENANT CHURCH, 7bygon.Non-p fit corporation �� 16-d /� --4 ,Mike Morris,Church Chair by ,Debbie Ray,Church Secretary STATE OF OREGON ) )SS. COUNTY OF WASHINGTON ) THIS IS TO CERTIFY that on 2.--A4 day of jet vl.k 4.4j ,2004 before me,the undersigned Notary Public in and for the State of Oregon,duly commissioned and sworn,personally appeared YY1 4( rno.,'c t S as Church Chair and Pe Je 1 as Church Secretary of TIGARD COVENANT CHURCH an Oregon Non-profit corporation,grantor,to me known to be the identical persons mentioned in and who executed the within and foregoing Quit Claim Deed,and they acknowledged to me that they signed said instrument for and in behalf of TIGARD COVENANT CHURCH,an Oregon Non-profit corporation, grantor,with full authority to do so,as its free and voluntary act and deed,for the uses and purposes therein mentioned- WITNESS my hand and official notarial seal on the day,month and year in this certificate first above written.-,,_Q__,Q (0,-sk My Commission Expires /O 09 NOTARY PUBLIC in and for the State of Oregon Seal/Stamp `varL OFFICIAL SEAL -LAURIE ACEVEDO `' NOTARY PUBLIC-OREGON 1 COMMISSION NO. 336696 /1 r MMY COMMISSION'%PIBES OCT.2,2004 �-74..;:>. ... ,��.- - —.••.J Application for Exemption from Washington County Transfer Tax nsfers of real property for which the selling price is thirteen thousand nirle hundred ninety-nine Lars ($13,999.00.) or less. 3.04.030J.13. lcr;.,.,1,,,,i AL;�.,Ii, being first duly sworn, say that I am the (Grantor) (Grantee) (other) (-,.<-a,0 4c_c . That the transfer of the property recorded as document number Zcc`!-Olt)Cbt is npt under the tax pursuant to the following exemption and required information. Required Information: ['he real market value of the real property on the tax roll of the county on the date of the sale. consideration of less than $13,999 is stated on your transfer. State the nature of all other consideration involved n the transaction, including other property given in trade and any amount assumed by the buyer(grantee)of the eller's (grantor's) debt. f sold for less than the real market value, since the value is greater than the sale price, state if the difference is a ift. If not, give an explanation of the difference in price. If the difference is a gift, then provide the required aformation under 3.04.030J.16.. Treal ff rape--ky i01-34f 1a elk( Icrt...ke1• lioci ti�LA l;J1le l.'-. Lve > to t,, 4-1-12,- +l .-'a lin y, C. ! tie (..): :,r:-:4-I c.:.e-s_ 'or documents ents that are no consideration transfers, state all the names and legal entities of the grantors or sellers.l 1 13,./c.t CQ�,�,4.y•l- chvrc-13 . . l.t�. Mc, (114„it GL•.,{ i De-LLie_ �L.y .ScLic1.'7 / or documents that are no consideration transfers, state all the names and legal entities of the grantees or buyers. EL--L,. n De z. Il.• ,S441, tz G-pI//' iditional consideration was given for this transfer. I understand that this information is available for inspection Internal Revenue Service and The Orego State Department of Revenue. ature) _ ' 7711191aira7 , . - -ia.lrAW 9f r reool Y of hJhswi r--)(er- Sworn and subscribed to before me this %LI day of 44Y , 20 0'04 . �•�. OFFICIAL SEAL Notary Pu is for Oregon KEUBLIC-N My Commission Expires 7-1-Q.5 NOTARY PUBLIC-OREGON \, , COMMISSION NO.A347361 MY COMMISSION EXPIRES JULY 1,2005 Return l S Washl� -n County,Oregon 2004-010066 7 ta.X *c�tr.,-,�f$ -ro 02/01 02:19:58 PM D-DC Cnt■1 Stna21 RECORDS1 DEZFULLI, EBRAHIM $5.00$5.00$11.00-Total a$22.00 LI, SHAHIM 12587 S, 111111111111,II II 11 12587 SW 133RD AVE . I � TIGARD,OR 97223 QUIT CLAIM DEED 00526531200400100660010017 I,Jerry Hannon,Director of A mint and Taxation and Ex-DHIclo County Clerk for Washington County, t:".‹,,,,, .... Made this 2? of∎ci.n►,G.mti ,2004 between Oregon,do hereby certify that the within Instrument of writing was received and recorded in the book of •��(i :,rjfq`lj 1 Ti records of said county. 1 0.ksotr �,. ;.:;.• THE GRANTOR Tint Jerry R.Hanson,Director men!and Taxation, x+ ,.. Ex-Officlo County Clerk TIGARD COVENANT CHURCH,an Oregon non profit corporation for in in consideration of the sum of TWO THOUSAND FIVE HUNDRED AND NO/100 DOLLARS($2,500.00) in hand paid,the Recipt of which is hereby acknowledged Conveys and quit claims to EBRAHIM DEZFULLI AND SHAHIM DEZFULLI,husband and wife as joint tenants with right of survivorship the following described real estate situated in the County of Washington and State of Oregon, together with all after acquired title of the grantor(s)therein: ONLY THOSE PORTIONS LYING SOUTH OF NAEVE ROAD OF THE FOLLOWING TRACT OF LAND: LOT 9,WILLOW BROOK FARM,EXCEPT THAT PORTION THEREOF CONVEYED TO THE STATE OF OREGON BY DEED RECORDED MARCH II, 1931 IN BOOK 146,PAGE 423,IN THE CITY OF TIGARD, COUNTY OF WASHINGTON, STATE OF OREGON. GRANTOR TIGARD COVENANT CHURCH, gonnNon-p fit corporation ��II , by /�f� J/1i ,Mike Morris,Church Chair . If by ,4.SA. ,Debbie Ray,Church Secretary STATE OF OREGON ) )SS. COUNTY OF WASHINGTON )){ THIS IS TO CERTIFY that on 2 2 h day of Jd►'t. &4-'iy ,2004 before me,the undersigned Notary Public in and for the State of Oregon,duly commissioned and sworn,personally appeared Yri.►(� m0'Cr t S as Church Chair and P1 12-sky as Church Secretary of TIGARD COVENANT CHURCH an Oregon Non-profit corporation,grantor,to me known to be the identical persons mentioned in and who executed the within and foregoing Quit Claim Deed,and they acknowledged to me that they signed said instrument for and in behalf of TIGARD COVENANT CHURCH,an Oregon Non-profit corporation, grantor,with full authority to do so,as its free and voluntary act and deed,for the uses and purposes therein mentioned. WITNESS my hand and official notarial seal on the day,month and year in this certificate first above written. My Commission Expires /0-2..—0 g4A44 P/u2Arsk NOTARY PUBLIC in and for the State of Oregon Seal/Stamp r� ---�., - �`� —-• _ _-.....------7 l ri .fez' OFFICIAL SEAL ( r—y z----•-L:AUCtlE ACEVEDO `((()/ ) .•a' NOTARY PUBLIC-OREGON f} COMMISSION NO. 336696 ) ( MY COMMISSION'SPIRES OCT.2,2004 () Application for Exemption from Washington County Transfer Tax insfers of real property for which the selling price is thirteen thousand nine hundred ninety-nine lars ($13,999.00.) or less. 3.04.030J.13. • Lto r �i '61 L1-z.PJ ll, being first duly sworn, say that I am the (Grantor) (Grantee) (other) (II' r,;,,,,4 c. . That the transfer of the property recorded as document number ZCD`J-010ca, is nnpt under the tax pursuant to the following exemption and required information. Required Information: The real market value of the real property on the tax roll of the county on the date of the sale. • A consideration of less than$13,999 is stated on your transfer. State the nature of all other consideration involved in the transaction, including other property given in trade and any amount assumed by the buyer(grantee) of the teller's (grantoorrr's) debt. if sold for less than the real market value, since the value is greater than the sale price, state if the difference is a Oft. If not, give an explanation of the difference in price. If the difference is a gift, then provide the required nformation under 3.04.030J.16.. TI, rat fra p[r+y i.. hfln&t lozke �`, av'd L4 /..-11 le k::.. 1,, ,> Gt .j or-e- 4 r '1' n P41 y S c. l • it l�c in: t,_,-.)./ (,....:.s A. 1 :•b i l:-i-7 -4- - -1.141._ c h., /.. . "or documents that are no consideration transfers, state all the names and legal entities of the grantors or sellers. rlVa. Co„c-"_44- CAor•c..k . .M.kP.,. Mc ►-,s ((kJ.I. ct,.•f) Deli... _ R4,y ( se��.l. ,y) or documents that are ko consideration transfers, state alL the names and legal entities of the grantees or buyers. Efy-L,. De Z,- a I1. (S4,41:. Dr--14:0 1 1 dditional consideration was given for this transfer. I understand that this information is available for inspection e Internal Revenue Service and The Orego State Department of Revenue. ature) or ...A_ - ...11 , , 77J" P.A. w 1.1411111.2W of i r71 of 1„J/-St r✓4 r-- Sworn and subscribed to before me this I q day of 4 gem/4-V , 20 6.9q . �•�. OFFICIAL SEAL Notary Pu is for Oregon - KEN TIPTON My Commission Expires 7-1-05 141 NOTARY'PUBUJC-OREGON �, COMMISSION NO.A347361 MY COMMISSION EXPIRES JULY 1.2005 AFFIDAVIT OF MAILIN(,,POSTING NEIGHBORHOOD MEETING NOTICE IMPORTANT=NOTICE:' ,THE APPLICANT IS REQUIRED TO MAIL:THE CITY OF TIGARDA COPY OF THE NEIGHBORHOOp MEETING NOTICE THAT PERTAINS TO THIS AFFIDAVIT AT THE SAME TIME PROPERTY OWNERS:ARE:HAiLED NOTICE, TO THE ADDRESS.BELOW: _ City of Tigard Planning Division 13125 SW Hall Boulevard • -Tigard, OR '7223-8189 IN ADDITION,THE APPLICANT SHALL SUBMIT-THIS AFFIDAVIT & COPIES OF ALL NOTICES AT THE TIME OF APPLICATION. MAILING: 1, 6, ?..; //,,44 i°< -1)(�'7/-:V eing duly sworn, depose and say that on the ,16(i1 day of FrP, 20 0(-( , I caused to have mailed to each of the persons on the attached list, a notice of a meeting to discuss a proposed development at (or near) Alr7{ &r(-J 1-e 3k G,L,y) ./v?c( (7,fv , a copy of which notice so mailed is attached hereto and made a part of hereof. I further state that said notices were enclosed in envelopes plainly addressed to said persons and were deposited on the date indicated above in the United States Post Office located at / G 4-R Ti) .jt,5 -,--- 42,,c,----/r Ci with postage prepaid thereon. ,� X11' i Alt4 ' ignature (In the presence o ra otary Public) POSTING: I I, ?'ft ff/M t— . .)�--7f srCti do affirm that I am (represent) the party initiating interest in a proposed affecting the land located at (state the approximate location(s) IF no address(s) and/or tax lot(s) currently registered) and did on the day of , 20 personally post notice indicating that the site may be proposed for a application, and the time, date and place of a neighborhood meeting to discuss the proposal. The sign was posted at I 1) . v� , 24.r-(f((' /LV4;r (state location you posted(notice on property) • --gilla ./\__ �) Gal Signature (In the pro nce s of a Notary Public) (THIS SECTION FOR A STATE OF OREGON, NOTARY PUBLIC TO COMPLETE/NOTARIZE) STATE OF o & ) County of "u3,---- 1-‘I n-J-}tlr) ss. Subscribed and sworn/affirmed before me on the 2l� day of 1 C-OrbeLrj , 20 tY' . ere;.... OFFICIAL SEAL 'I DUNA HIMPLER 47,41 NOTARY PUBLIC-OREGON Cinij Vie0 COMMISSION NO.350874 MY COMMISSION EXPIRES OCTOBEP 30.201?, NOTARY PUBLIC OF OREGON My Commission Expires: \pplicant, please complete the information below: JAME OF PROJECT OR PROPOSED DEVELOPMENT: YPE OF PROPOSED DEVELOPMENT: kddress or General Location of Subject Property: subject Property Tax Map(s)and Lot#(s): h Uogin\patty\masterslaffdavit of mailing-posting neighborhood meeting_doc 10 _ 0 /✓ /4 J-(cfl / fiti a_ 00`( -T/>/L WA- S A 4 E 1-0'f3 E� fivo D / € 1 /✓( fiC LP c 6'(' -7-'t9f r • ( o - vu- 6ko uAv ikAl R 9, 716./1-4D , .04 €C 0 N) - r77-1Clec w s a 7TCND,s A-% I1017 WE- y//1/ fi= o 061 -17/E- n/ (GN 8t '(f/oo0 # i 07/11"/I el — crf Prop 05c2J .......------------- A/a rrct+, V€. December 17, 2004 SUMMARY Applicant Ebrahim Dezfulli 12587 S.W. 133'Ave. Tigard, Oregon 97223 Property Address N/A—S.E. Corner of S.W. Naeve St. and S.W. Highway 99 Legal Description 2S1 10DB TL1200 Site Size 0.90 Ac. Zoning Designation C-G Proposal Description Construct Retail Used Automobile Sales Lot Necessary Applications Site Development Review Pre-application meeting February, 24 2004 APPLICANTS REQUEST Ebrahim Dezfulli is requesting permission to build a used automobile sales lot, a 350 square foot sales office and associated utilities, and a storm water quality facility to treat runoff from newly created impervious surfaces. This site has been determined to have no impact to sensitive areas by CWS service provider letter. APPLICABLE ZONING AND DEVELOPMENT CODE APPROVAL CRITERIA This request requires Site Development Review approval. Applicable Development Code Standards are as follows: • Site Development Review(18.360) • Decision-Making Procedures (18.390) • Commercial Zoning Districts (18.520) • Access, Egress, and circulation(18.705) • Environmental Performance Standards(18.725) • Exceptions to Development Standards(18.730) • Landscaping and Screening(18.745) • Mixed Solid Waste and Recyclable Storage(18.755) • Off-street Parking and Loading(18.765) • Signs (18.780) • Tree Removal (18.790) • Visual Clearance Areas(18.795) • Street and Utility Improvement Standards(18.810) • Neighborhood Meeting ANALYSIS AND FINDINGS 18.32 Narrative: The following code sections have been addressed: 18.360: Site Development Review—Approval Criteria 1. The proposed development has been designed to comply with the City of Tigard Development Code. Appropriate dedication will be done to comply with public right of way requirements. 2. Building location shall be accomplished with as little impact to the site as possible, and oriented such to best utilize the site. No wetlands are present on the site. Some existing trees will be removed and mitigated for, as depicted on the Preliminary Grading, Erosion Control, Tree Removal Plan. 3. Buffering and screening as required is shown on the appropriate plan. 4. Privacy/multi-family: N/A 5. Shared outdoor area/multi-family: N/A 6. Shared outdoor recreation/multi-family:N/A 7. No open areas are available on this site. 8. Structures and areas on the site are clear to use, and all areas will be designated as to public or private areas. 9. The building has been designed to UBC code requirements and should provide adequate security and safety measures. Parking areas and building perimeter areas will be lit according to standard business practices. 10. Public transit is available on S.W. Highway 99 with bus stops located at the intersection of the highway and S.W. Beef Bend Rd. and at S.W. Royalty Parkway. 11. Landscaping— 15%of the site area is shown as new landscaping to meet City standards. 12. Site drainage has been shown on the Preliminary Street& Storm Plan. A water quality facility has been designed according to USA standards, and to meet current ODOT requirements for discharge into State highway right-of-way. Storm runoff will be treated prior to discharge into the public roadside ditch. 13. The building has been designed to meet ADA standards. Accessible parking spaces have been provided with the required accessible connections to the building. 14. The building has been designed and located according to current zoning regulations. 18.390: Decision-Making Procedures—This application is for a Type II procedure, site development review. A pre-application conference took place Febuary 24th 2004. A neighborhood meeting has been held as required. Appropriate applications have been submitted, along with plans, fees and this narrative as required. 18.520: Commercial Zoning Districts—The proposed construction is located in the General Commercial (C-G)zone. The proposed construction has been designed for an automobile sales use,which is permitted in this zone. Development standards have been met as shown on the site plan, and as described previously in • this narrative. 18.705: Access. Egress and Circulation 18.705.030—general provisions a. Continuing obligation of the property owner. - Owner understands this condition b. Access plan requirements - The plans are provided showing access ingress, egress and circulation from SW Naeve street and SW royalty parkway.These are in accordance to the standards. c. Joint access -No joint access is purposed in the plan d. Public street access - Two paved driveways are proposed for the accessways into the proposed site. The proposed building is accessible from SW Naeve St. and Royalty Parkway, both of which are public streets that will be maintained as a public street. e. Curb cuts - The submitted site plan shows curb cuts at the entrance drives to be constructed out of concrete. The driveway approaches are a minimum of 40 feet from the side property lines. The widths of the driveway approaches are 30 feet which meets the standards. f. Required walkway location - A concrete walkway extends from the main entrance of the sales office to the northern property line and will connect to the proposed sidewalk of SW Naeve Street. g. Inadequate hazardous access -No hazardous conditions have been identified N/A h. Access management 1. An access report has been prepared and submitted verifying adequate sight distance for the proposed driveway locations. 2. The location for the proposed Naeve St. and Royalty Parkway driveway approaches meet the minimum requirement of 150' set back from the intersecting street's right-of-way to the throat of the driveways. Minimum access requirements for commercial use & V" - The proposed driveways are 30' in width with a pavement width of 24' minimum and therefore meet the minimum requirements set forth in the pre- application conference notes. Pedestrian access to the public right-of-way has been maintained with striping across the lot. i. One way vehicular access - The entrance drives are purposed for 2-way traffic.N/A 18.720: Design Compatibility Standards—The intended use for this development will be in compliance with this section. 18.725: Environmental Performance Standards— The intended use for this development will be in compliance with subsection 18.725.030. 18.730: Exceptions to Development Standards—No exceptions are being sought with this application. 18.745: Landscaping and Screening 18.745.040—street trees a. Protection of existing vegetation -As shown on the preliminary plans, street trees will be planted in accordance with the standards set in section 18.745.040C b. Street tree planting list - The plans show two (2) Karpick maples along SW pacific highway, six (6) Karpick maples along SW Naeve street and three(3) along SW royalty parkway. c. Size and spacing of street trees - The Proposed street trees are spaced no greater then 30 feet apart which is in accordance to section 18.745.040C 18.745.050—buffering and screening -The proposed lot will have a minimum of a 5-foot landscaped area surrounding the entire property. The parking lot will be landscaped with a combination of low- lying and vertical shrubbery and parking lot trees with landscaped islands on a basis of one(1) for every seven spaces. 18.755: Mixed Solid Waste and Recyclable Storage 18.755.080—location, design and access standards for storage areas a. Applicable standards - For this project, the minimum standards are being used for the design. A minimum storage area of 10 square feet, plus 4 square feet per 1000 square feet gross floor area. The proposed 350 square foot building will have a 120 square foot storage area. b. location standards -The proposed refuse container is located at the south end of the lot and is not adjacent to any public or private street. The container is accessed and visible from the parking lot. c. design standards — The garbage enclosure is 10' by 12' by 6' in height. d. access standards -The standards are in compliance with 18.755.080D 18.765: Off Street Parking and Loading—Four parking spaces(one ADA accessible) are designated on the site plan to meet the minimum requirement. The location of these spaces are shown on the Preliminary landscape plan. 18.780: Signs—A free standing sign is proposed in compliance with 18.780.130. Sign permits will be applied for at the time of building permit application. 18.790: Tree Removal—The Preliminary Grading, Erosion Control and tree removal Plan show existing trees, including trees greater than or equal to 12-inch caliper that are proposed to be retained or removed. There are 7 trees of 12-inches or greater in diameter located on the site. 3 of the 7 trees greater than or equal to 12-inches diameter must be removed to accommodate the site development. Fifty-seven percent of the trees greater than or equal to 12-inches in diameter. According to 18.790.060D, the number of replacement trees required is determined by dividing the estimated caliper size of the tree to be removed by the caliper size of the largest reasonably available replacement tree. The total caliper of the trees removed is 50-inches. Half of 50 is 25. The applicant has proposed to plant 5 (five)2-inch caliper and 15 (fifteen) 1-inch caliper Red Alder trees. 18.795: Visual Clearance Areas—The visual clearance triangles for the two site accesses have been maintained per code requirements. • 18.810: Street and Utility Improvements— Street Improvements: Half street improvements are required along the frontage of S.W.Naeve Street,including a 5' wide sidewalk with planter strip. Partial improvements along S.W. Royalty Parkway require a 5' wide sidewalk to be constructed. Those improvements are shown on the Preliminary Street& Storm Drain Plan. Overhead Utilities: The existing overhead power lines along S.W.Naeve Street are required to be relocated underground of a fee-in-lieu paid. The applicant is proposing to pay the fee-in-lieu of. Sanitary Sewer: A sanitary sewer service line is proposed to connect the office space to an existing 8"public sewer main located in S.W. Naeve Street. This improvement is shown on the Preliminary Sanitary Sewer& Water Plan. Water Supply: A water service line is proposed to connect the office space to an existing water main in S.W.Naeve Street. Irrigation service is proposed to branch off the service line behind the water meter. These improvements are shown on the Preliminary Sanitary Sewer&Water Plan. Storm Sewer/Storm Water Quality Improvements: The storm water collection system and storm water quality pond is shown on the submitted plan set. It has been sized and designed to meet the City's development standards. Detention has been provided to meet current Oregon State Department of Transportation standards. 18.810.060: Additional Lot Dimensional Requirements-This is an existing lot and therefore does not require a land partition process. The minimum required lot frontage of 25 feet. has been met. 18.390.040. 18.390.050: Impact Study-The proposed development is for an auto retail sales lot accessing both S.W.Naeve Street and S.W. Royalty Parkway. Particular areas of interest to the City are as follows: Transportation System: A traffic analysis report has been prepared by a licensed Oregon traffic engineer. This report indicates that there are no adverse impacts or special improvements required by this development. Drainage System: Stormwater runoff will be treated in a water quality facility and detained to meet applicable requirements. Parks: The nature of this development should have no impacts to local parks. Water: The proposed water connection will require a live tap to an existing water main. Water usage is anticipated to be minimal. These conditions will have no adverse impacts to the public water system. Sewer: The proposed service line will require a new connection to the existing sewer main in S.W. Naeve Street. Anticipated flows from said service line will be minimal and should have no impact to the public sewer system. Noise: No noise impacts are anticipated from this development. Neighborhood Meeting: A neighborhood meeting was held at the Tigard First Baptist Church Room MC 205 at 7:00 p.m. on Friday, September There were no attendees and no written comments were received. The affidavit of mailing, the affidavit of posting, a copy of the meeting letter, and labels have been provided with this application as required. Subdivision Plat Name Reservation: N/A,per pre-application meeting Building Permits: Building permits will be sought for the proposed construction only After Land Use Approvals have been obtained Additional Concerns or Comments: As described in the pre-application notes "Sales office must be permanent"—The proposed plan depicts a permanent structure for the sales office. im Mcmillan -CF2002904.pdf Page 1 Zt January 7,2005 Applicant: Ebriham Dezfulli 12587 S.W. 133rd Ave. Tigard,Oregon 97223 Property Address N/A—S.E.Corner of S.W.Naeve St.and S.W.Highway 99 Legal Description 2S1 10DB TL1200 Site Size 0.90+/-Ac. Zoning Designation C-G Proposal Description Construct Retail Used Automobile Sales Lot RE:Sight Distance Certification Ebrahim Dezfulli is requesting approval from the City of Tigard to develop a vacant parcel for retail operation of an automobile sales lot,which includes a 350 square foot sales office,and construction of associated utilities. Adequate sight distance is required for the proposed driveways accessing onto S.W. Royalty and S.W.Naeve St.(Washington County Community Development Code, Section 501-8.5,item F).The minimum required sight distance used is 10 times the posted speed limit,or 250'.The following table shows the available sight distances based on the proposed plan and field measurements. Driveway Direction of travel Sight Distance Location S.W.Naeve St. S.W.Naeve St.EB 170'* S.W.Naeve St.WB >250' S.W.Royalty EB >250' S.W.Royalty S.W.Royalty WB >250' *This sight distance meets requirements using 15 mph turning speed;NB from Hwy. 99 turning EB onto S.W.Naeve St. There appears to be no restriction due to physical obstructions,grade or topographic constraints that are beyond the control of the developer,to meet the required sight distances. Niskt0 PROF GIN FR • • G. t rerer,PE r`0,"" .urG.litter unott paw ABSM , l ha Ji #..k. ll UNIFIED SEWERAGE AGENCY OF WASHINGTON COUNTY February 9, 2001 Ebrahim Dezfulli 12587 SW 133rd Tigard, OR 97223 • Randy Hinderer 614 SW 11th Ave, Suite 401 Portland, OR 97205 Re: Development at SW Naeve Street and Highway 99W, King City, Oregon (USA file 836, Tax map 2S110DB, Tax lot 1200) The Unified Sewerage Agency (Agency) has reviewed your proposal for the above referenced activity on your site. Agency staff has conducted a pre-screen review and requested completion of a Sensitive Areas Certification Form. Following Agency review it appears that sensitive areas do not exist on-site and the sensitive area near this site would only require a 50' buffer. Since your property is beyond the 50' maximum buffer, the above referenced project does not need a Service Provider letter as required by Agency Resolution and Order 00-7, Section 3.02.1 . Prior to construction, a Stormwaler Connection Permit from the Agency or its designee is required pursuant to Ordinance 27, Section 4.B. All required permits and approvals must be obtained and completed under applicable local, state, and federal law. This concurrence letter does NOT eliminate the need to protect sensitive areas if they are subsequently identified on your site. If you have any questions, please feel free to call me at 503-846-3613. Sincerely, Heidi K. Berg • Site Assessment Coordinator \\MO_SERV_04\eng$\Development Svcs\SP 00-7\Concurrence Letters\2S110DB01200.doc 155 North First Avenue, Suite 270, MS 10 Phone: 503/846-8621 Hillsboro, Oregon 97124-3072 FAX: 503/846-3525 Arbori' &f/The epor+ S • HALSTEAD'S ARBORICULTURE "Specialists in the care and preservation of trees" • CONSULTANTS, INC. David Halstead,Consultant,B.S. Phillip Whitcomb,Consultant P.O.Box 1182•Tualatin,OR 97062 (503)245-1383 19C6/ November 29, 2004 • Mr. Abe Dezfull P WTy Op ?0,44 .r 12587 SW 133rd Avenue i 'oho.,liGgRn Tigard, OR 97223 re./4 •� Ph 503.524.5433 FX Cell 503.312.1596 / • Reference: Tree Assessment for Proposed Development Location: South Side Naeve Street at the Intersection of HWY 99W, l• ' . Tigard, Oregon • Subject Tree Survey/Mitigation Report A Ref: HAC Report dated February 20, 2002: Per your instructions we have revisited the site, inspected the trees and , completed an individual "Tree Inspection sheer describing the trees' veto {'r characteristics, including their health and structure. (See enclosed copies). The over all inspection resulted in the same findings as described in the February 20, 2002 report. • t Therefore, we submit the February 20, 2002 report in its entirety with a few modifications to the "Tree Care and Preservation" section and updating the date and the bi-monthly report section recently required by the City of Tigard. (See - enclosed copy). • ! With your approval, I have inspected the site, site plan "Highway 99 Auto Resale"and the trees for the proposed project located on the south side of Naeve Street at the intersection of HWY 99W, Tigard, Oregon. The purpose of this inspection was to identify and evaluate the preservation potential of all trees twelve inches in trunk diameter(measured at four feet above ground) and larger under the forthcoming construction in accordance with the City of Tigard's Tree Ordinance Chapter 18.150. I have tagged and numbered all trees, both in the field and in this report that will be affected by construction development using 601 through 618 series tags for easy identification. The first numbered tree starts in the southeast corner of the property. Email: hac @spiritone.com www.halsteadsarboriculture.com CCB#0068646 SL Page 2 November 29, 2004 Reference: Tree Assessment for Proposed Development Location: South Side Naeve Street at the Intersection of HWY 99W, Tigard, Oregon Subject: Tree Survey/Mitigation Report TREE ASSESSMENT There are a total of seventeen trees located totally within project boundaries and one major tree located 20 percent within project boundaries. There are six trees less than twelve inches in trunk diameter measured at four feet above ground and are not required to be part of the City of Tigard's `Tree Mitigation Identification Program." Those trees are as follows: 604, 605, 607, 612 and 617. This leaves a residual of twelve trees within project boundaries that are twelve inches in trunk diameter and larger that are required to be part of the City of Tigard's "Tree Mitigation/Identification Program." Five of these trees are hazardous, should be removed, and will not be mitigated. Of the remaining seven trees that are preservable, one tree is within hardscape boundaries and/or will not survive construction trauma and will need to be mitigated under the City of Tigard's Mitigation Plan. The other six trees are being preserved under the forthcoming construction. Hazardous trees are as follows: Tree numbers: 606, 609, 611, 613 and 614. It is not unusual to find this many hazardous trees on a partially developed site such as this. Most of these trees are growing in an overcrowded situation and have never had any formal care. Most of the hazards come from severe decay, bark inclusions, and multiple trunks formed from breakage caused by winter storms or repeated topping for power lines. Trees that will not survive construction trauma, will be removed and therefore mitigated: Tree numbered 608 only. 37 Page 3 November 29, 2004 Reference: Tree Assessment for Proposed Development Location: South Side Naeve Street at the Intersection of HWY 99W, Tigard, Oregon Subject: Tree Survey/Mitigation Report Trees that will be preserved are as follows: Tree numbers: 601, 602, 603, 610, 615 and 618. Amount of Preservable Tree Retainage = 90% (7/8'100) "Retainage of 75 percent or greater of existing trees over 12 inches in caliper requires no mitigation"according to City Ordinance 18.150.025- 2b. As stated there is one Redwood tree, numbered 618, that is at the apex of the northeast corner of the neighboring property and over laps on to the proposed development project by approximately 20 percent. This tree is a fine specimen, healthy and structurally stable and the finest tree on or near the site. Although there is a proposed driveway within this area and the area is the narrowest portion of the project there is ample room for both providing the tree receives professional arboriculture care. The remaining preserved trees will also survive the forthcoming construction trauma providing their root zones are not overly disturbed and the tree care and preservation guidelines listed below are followed. Tree Care and Preservation Guidelines Before construction begins, preserved trees and/or their root zones will need to be protected by the installation of orange colored "Tree Protection Fencing"out to the canopy dripline of preserved tree(s). Fencing needs to be attached to 7- foot tall steel fence posts placed eight feet apart on center forming a protective line around the preserved trees and fence posts need to be securely anchored in the soil to a depth of two feet. A small diameter cable and/or heavy wire should be weaved and sewn through the protective fencing two feet above ground to secure the fencing. The fencing, as described, will need to be maintained throughout the entirety of the project. 1 Page 4 November 29, 2004 Reference: Tree Assessment for Proposed Development Location: South Side Naeve Street at the Intersection of HWY 99W, Tigard, Oregon Subject: Tree Survey/Mitigation Report Before any work is completed within the protected area and/or if the fencing needs to be adjusted due to hardscape construction, it will first require the approval of the consulting arborist and then be supervised on-site. Structural and deadwood tree pruning will also need to be completed during construction site preparation/site clearing in order to make these trees safe for surrounding persons and property. The arboriculture technicians working within the trees will also need to inspect the tree/s very carefully to make sure that preserved trees are well prepared for the forthcoming construction. After project completion, therapeutic fertilization will be necessary for all preserved trees to help stimulate new root growth from roots damaged during construction and replenish any loss of soil nutrients for optimum tree growth. Hazardous tree removal within project boundaries needs to be completed in a careful manner as to not damage any preserved trees. Any tree or existing stump removed within 15 feet of a preserved tree needs to have the stump groundout rather than excavated to reduce overall root trauma. Sincerely, —"WleZ-0-41J David Halstead BS, CA James Lowery PNC #1808 .J �Xoo I i ,. \ i \ P t \ iri -605 . �L \ I I1r ,., _ I - 6D6 \ ,,\.1.40.... ..... � 60 , . , .4��. \� IV \ �X� 607 . �- / 1- '� der ,, 610 / ■611 _.61? .,�; \11/ ..,-----.7,://. \sks..---,,,....\ /,;;. 2:: 4 a , o Ropy •= \ 3 I 602 608 I <_ , .viitv ■ ok► �� \ Q _ : � 1 .\ nde�os• �1� %1�� - - 615 6 �+�'!`od�epol • N • 616 , ,. 0. CO 609 mod; N �� _ � 33 : ; il SQ. . / . ., , c/ c TREE ASSESSMENT SHEET PAGE PROJECT DATE REF: I, TREE NUMBER# 6 0 I HAZTREE# SPECIAL# 1) v1) Species 7 Dia. @ 4.5 feet (DBH) / Dia. @ DGL a z7 Height 7 0 Limb Spread 6 6 Health % go Structure /o z it Remarks: /::i...G' - i••1.. �d n • , .O g-_L__)-WA__A.ofi tLat4 i✓` REF: TREE NUMBER# t7 a HAZTREE# SPECIAL# Species p Dia. @ 4.5 feet(DBH) 1 ).4). Dia. @ DGL Height 6 Limb Spread I/O Health % Sa Structure% b ,i { , 1 jc5 Remarks: ��..:.�.� .'.� � . .�...♦ ,i ****- ************************************** ******** ******************************* REF: TREE NUMBER# v D- HAZTREE# SPECIAL# Species P P€,I Dia. @ 4.5 feet(DBH) ig ' ' Dia. @ DGL 2_3 Height 60 Limb Spread \ > v Health% 44c0 Structure% 70 Remarks: ' '4..djie .� �:�► _4 _.� A 1 r 2 f a Jh v>tl _ IF 12 Ai .41:i. ∎ *********************************40 ***************************************************** REF: TREE NUMBER# 6 O HAZTREE# SPECIAL# Species 141), " Dia. @ 4.5 feet (DBH) 0 ' ' Dia. @ DGL J v , - 1 f� Height 1 7 Limb Spread / 0 Health % 70 Structure � a 7 D1 Remarks: "matt"- /0-1) em kyc, **** **************************************************** ********************** ********* &,,&L,e1A,Q_■ e6.47-1 -t--da •14)616f 94 -'16-11-4S . .d. 'fall /1 1 ( (_ll TREE ASSESSMENT SHEET PAGE PROJECT DATE REF: TREE NUMBER# b 0 5 HAZTREE# SPECIAL# T f ) 1 Species Dia. @ 4.5 feet (DBH) 41.. Dia. @ DGL / Height 2 Limb Spread I 0 Health % g 0 Structure% tO Remarks: iss—c REF: / TREE NUMBER# 0) a HAZTREE# SPECIAL# 13 Species �i �L(8 ._ Dia. @ 4.5 feet (DBH) ) / Dia. @ DGL ") Height ■O Limb Spread ® Health % 60 Structure% If() Remarks: A .►JLI&.Ai /411 .C.41. .s4,1ua!! g A, //A AiA_At 1 ' ***************** t ****************** ********************** ******************************* REF: TREE NUMBER# 60 7 _ HAZTREE# SPE IAL# ;< It r Species Dia. @ 4.5 feet(DBH) Dia. @ DGL 7g Height 50 Limb Spread _3G Health % 6 0 Structure % SO Remarks: „ 1.M1 1,1'- 3_, "Lt-°4e1,f . -JM- .60 .n`t if -- r *************** *. ************************************************************* ******* REF: ii * TREE NUMBER# 008 HAZTREE# SPECIAL# Species P 1.4 Dia. @ 4.5 feet (DBH) Dia. @ DGL_ .R) Height g Limb Spread LID Hea h % 110 Structure% g 0 Remarks' "ACt.21-iYeat 0C-- ************************************************************ ******************************* TREE ASSESSMENT SHEET PAGE PROJECT DATE__M____ RE: JJ y TREE NUMBER# O HAZTREE* SPECIAL# �"? , / --; • 1 i I Species /'" DIA.@ DGL J 41, Dia. @ 4.5 feet(DBH) Height ' ( Limb Spread (/ Health% h 0 Structure% (., � S Remarks: 4115-4t, _ligit ..„.:5 L,' J4éi?hdJ , ,,,o1,4.7--ctiv ************* 0111 ************** ** * *** * ********* REF: TREE NUMBER# 610 HAZTREE# SPECIAL# r__, ,i ' � Species .C�L�t , rL°e ,�,- DIA.@ DGL a3 Dia. @ 4.5 feet(DBH) l Height o Li Spread �O Health%S.6 Structure% l� C� Remarks: ZiEet., iteA1-61,4 AA_ LALAatePzM____N_E____ 1 *************** REF: TREE NUMBER# 6 l j L HAZTREE It 4c SPECIAL# ,� Species DIA.@ DGL 37 Dia. @ 4.5 feet(DBH) 3 T' Height 1 O Li Spread 6 Health% ,6 Structure% 2C 1, , • / Remarks: A 1 P-. : :11 iY: A . ., A-�tL ■ ;� ************************************** • REF: / TREE NUMBER# 4 I r_ HAZTREE# SPECIAL# Species P P ti,C DIA. @ DGL /�/ @ 4.5 feet(DBH) 1 Height Limb Spread Health % Structure% Remarks: ************************************************************ *******************AA********** 1/ 3 TREE ASSESSMENT SHEET PAGE PROJECT - _DATE, : TREE /3 HAZTREE# SPE$ — TREE NUMBER# O 4.5 feet BH) i Species DIA.@ DGL /� Dia. @ (D il Height Limb Spread 7 0 Health% [� 0 Structure% 416 9 ► , Remarks: A 1.uLe,, . / 4, _ A t.. A.IiA A..)2AN- J VD' ......pLv‘.._ TREE 6 � TREE NUMBER# HAZTREE# SPEC L# Species __, DIA.@ DGL /6° 'a. @ 4.5 feet( H) °� Height O Limb pread 110 Health % 6ç) Structure% cO -- Remarks: ►JF�Q t A. � t . 41 w, ' ��l�✓l Q 4 . ee.eurli REF: TREE NUMBER# 6AS- HAZTREE# SPE9AL# Species Zittitb 1-4.1:1L DIA.@ DGL / ? Dia. @ 4.5 feet(DBH) ) Height eL 0 Limb Spread zip Health% 60 Structure% 0 Remarks: ' ,A_ g_ ***********************trkirk**********k********************************AA******dr REF: TREE NUMBER# b lb HAZTREE# SPEC L# ' DIA. DGL Dia. @ 4.5 feet(DBH) ,/,_.Species .,lJ .��Y _ @ j i � Height / a _Limb Spread , 5 Health% 1/) Structure% 0 Remarks: A. 0 *******************************************************fir************************in******#*** I I c A_tt`$� Hk'Y. 9gW i :. C 11! °AC/F/C . a �� ._ pea 8 1 .` 6 I� �l� rig I�� _. ��`, ter.,_ CC lir ':,tk ,t,;•',.s.r.11./.:' j / / /--,, 0 * 4, . rlf//,/, / ,./ / 4resp, tLti ;� / � c _� YI , ; S1 I•M r. Sri / 1. '. %",. ii.0 ,,,Z11='...:''"jiiiiiiipAZir 414; /redri n 11 f . / /, / / 222,1 11 it '/ ; %' �/ 1:111 Al% i / 1 0 '41 ; -„,.. ,,s,.. -„ d �. f 8 .All„Lik,:, -7 r r � ; .. � ___ _. a g Atot , /[,t' Ia j o I S 1 ,lam, �; 1 Z \ i ri, 1 I i Jfl Q tp 8 % � i' X40 /, 1 t 411t4tS71/ /i/V/ // A it • % ./ ,. % c je 7/40 ,ilk i: % / ; ' ' / 7 i . 0 j % i \ am «....: % L., _ 5/10 DEZFULLI AUTO SALES TREE REMOVAL MOM raaK, ° '°� Natl. EBRAHIM DEZFUW AND EROSION CONTROL PLAN VW as Rf. - pm IMPS.AM- s m :14. CITY OF TIOARD Community Development ShapingA Better Community LAND USE PROPOSAL DESCRIPTION 120 DAYS = 5/31/2005 FILE NO.: SITE DEVELOPMENT REVIEW (SDR) 2004-00010 FILE TITLE: DEZFULLI AUTO SALES APPLICANT: Ebrahim Dezfulli OWNER: Ebrahim & Shahin Dezfulli 12587 SW 133rd 12587 SW 133rd Tigard, OR 97223 Tigard, OR 97223 REQUEST: The applicant is requesting Site Development Review approval to construct a used automobile sales lot with an associated 350 square foot sales office. LOCATION: 15280 SW Pacific Highway; WCTM 2S110DB, Tax Lot 1200. ZONE: C-G: General Commercial District. The C-G zoning district is designed to accommodate a full range of retail, office and civic uses with a City-wide and even regional trade area. Except where non-conforming, residential uses are limited to single-family residences which are located on the same site as a permitted use. APPLICABLE REVIEW CRITERIA: Community Development Code Chapters 18.360, 18.390, 18.520, 18.705, 18.725, 18.745, 18.755, 18.765, 18.780, 18.790, 18.795 and 18.810. DECISION MAKING BODY BELOW: ❑ TYPE I ® TYPE II El TYPE III ❑ TYPE IV DATE COMMENTS WERE SENT: FEBRUARY 2, 2005 DATE COMMENTS ARE DUE: FEBRUARY 16, 2005 ❑HEARINGS OFFICER (MON.) DATE OF HEARING: TIME: 7:00 PM ❑PLANNING COMMISSION (MON.) DATE OF HEARING: TIME: 7:00 PM ❑CITY COUNCIL (TUES.) DATE OF HEARING: TIME: 7:30 PM ®STAFF DECISION (TENTATIVE) DATE OF DECISION: MARCH 14, 2005 COMPONENTS RELATED TO THE PROJECT AVAILABLE FOR VIEWING IN THE PLANNING DIVISION ® VICINITY MAP ❑ DRAINAGE PLAN ® IMPACT STUDY ® SITE PLAN ❑ STORM WATER ANALYSIS ® SIGHT DISTANCE ANALYSIS ® NARRATIVE ® TREE PLAN ® OTHER: MISCELLANEOUS STAFF CONTACT: Mathew Scheidegger, Associate Planner (503) 639-4171, Ext. 2437 uLilil January 31 , 2005 CITY OF TIGARD OREGON Ebrahim Dezfulli 12587 SW 133rd Avenue Tigard, OR 97223 RE: Notice of Complete Submittal-SDR2004-00010 USED CAR SALES FACILITY Dear Mr. Dezfulli: The City has received the information necessary to begin the review of your Site Development application. Staff has, therefore, deemed your application submittal complete as of January 31, 2005 and will begin the review process. The estimated time for rendering a decision from the date an application is deemed as complete is 6-8 weeks. If you have any questions, please feel free to contact me at 503-639-4171, x2437. Sincerely, 9 Mat ew Scheidegger Ass ciate Planner is\curpin\mathew\sdr\SDR2004-00010.complete.doc c: SDR2004-00010 13125 SW Hall Blvd., Tigard, OR 97223 (503) 639-4171 TDD (503)684-2772 saloN DNEflI4MOD lNiOI ,I,VDI'IddV ilild CITY OF TIGARD CONFERENCE NOTES T or ityIRD.00opmeut Shaping:A BetterCommurtity (Pre-Application Meeting Notes are Valid for Six (6) Months) NON-RESIDENTIAL Ff TP.NIGDIE UL-3,4/•-r' 97£FAIrf ?: 71/S7�//I APPLICANT: ,f4 AGENT: Phone: (se ) say - s 43 Phone: ( ) PROPERTY LOCATION: ADDRESS/GENERAL LOCATION: / ) a_ Kee TAX MAP(S)/LOT #(S): -ZS/Y()� NECESSARY APPLICATIONS: r_50/Z.? � «� ✓i c �� w 'I�o.eJ e PROPOSAL DESCRIPTION: ( sue;�.L a v4 �'� �� c' COMPREHENSIVE PLAN MAP DESIGNATION: 244.e..--0•01 ZONING MAP DESIGNATION: -62 CITIZEN INVOLVEMENT TEAM (C.I.T.)AREA: ZONING DISTRICT DIMENSIONAL REQUIREMENTS [Refer to Code Section 18. MINIMUM LOT SIZE: sq. ft. Average Min. lot width: c-0 ft. Max. building height: /1—'ft. Setbacks: Front ft. Side ( ft. Rear c ft. Corner C ft. from street. MAXIMUM SITE COVERAGE: , % Minimum landscaped or natural vegetation area: /s" %. H NEIGHBORHOOD MEETING [Refer to the Neighborhood Meeting Handout] THE APPLICANT SHALL NOTIFY ALL PROPERTY OWNERS WITHIN 500 FEET, THE MEMBERS OF ANY LAND USE SUBCOMMITTEE(S), AND THE CITY OF TIGARD PLANNING DIVISION of their proposal. A minimum of two (2) weeks between the mailing date and the meeting date is required. Please review the Land Use Notification handout concerning site posting and the meeting notice. Meeting is to be held prior to submitting your application or the application will not be accepted. NOTE: In order to also preliminarily address building code standards, a meeting with a Plans Examiner is encouraged prior to submittal of a land use application. CITY OF TIGARD Pre-Application Conference Notes Page 1 of 8 NON-Residential Application/Planning Division Section M NARRATIVE [Refer to Code Chapter 18.3901 The APPLICANT SHALL SUBMIT A NARRATIVE which provides findings based on the applicable approval standards. Failure to provide a narrative or adequately address criteria would be reason to consider an application incomplete and delay review of the proposal. The applicant should review the code for applicable criteria. Z IMPACT STUDY [Refer to Code Sections 18.390.040 and 18.390.0501 As a part of the APPLICATION SUBMITTAL REQUIREMENTS, applicants are required to INCLUDE IMPACT STUDY with their submittal package. The impact study shall quantify the effect of the development on public facilities and services. The study shall address, at a minimum, the transportation system, including bikeways, the drainage system, the parks system, the water system, the sewer system and the noise impacts of the development. For each public facility system and type of impact, the study shall propose improvements necessary to meet City standards, and to minimize the impact of the development on the public at large, public facilities systems, and affected private property users. In situations where the Community Development Code requires the dedication of real property interests, the applicant shall either specifically concur with the dedication requirement, or provide evidence which supports the conclusion that the real property dedication requirement is not roughly proportional to the projected impacts of the development. ACCESS (Refer to Chapters 18.105 and 18.7651 Minimum number of accesses: i Minimum access width: - C . Minimum pavement width: _24 ' All driveways and parking areas, except for some fleet storage parking areas, must be paved. Drive-in use queuing areas: 0- WALKWAY REQUIREMENTS [Refer to Code Section 18.705.0301 WALKWAYS SHALL EXTEND FROM THE GROUND FLOOR ENTRANCES OR FROM THE GROUND FLOOR LANDING OF STAIRS, ramps, or elevators of all commercial, institutional, and industrial uses, to the streets which provide the required access and egress. Walkways shall provide convenient connections between buildings in multi-building commercial, institutional, and industrial complexes. Unless impractical, walkways should be constructed between a new development and neighboring developments. ❑ SPECIAL SETBACKS [Refer to Code Chapter 18.1301 D STREETS: feet from the centerline of D LOWER INTENSITY ZONES: feet, along the site's boundary. D FLAG LOT: 10-FOOT SIDE YARD SETBACK. SPECIAL BUILDING HEIGHT PROVISIONS (Refer to Code Section 18.730.0101.1 BUILDING HEIGHT EXCEPTIONS - Buildings located in a non-residential zone may be built to a height of 75 feet provided that: :- A maximum building floor area to site area ratio (FAR) of 1.5 to 1 will exist; • All actual building setbacks will be at least half (1/2) of the building's height; and • The structure will not abut a residential zoned district. BUFFERING AND SCREENING [Refer to Code Chapter 18.7451 In order TO INCREASE PRIVACY AND TO EITHER REDUCE OR ELIMINATE ADVERSE NOISE OR VISUAL IMPACTS between adjacent developments, especially between different land uses, the City requires landscaped buffer areas along certain site perimeters. Required buffer areas are described by the Code in terms of width. Buffer areas must be occupied by a mixture of deciduous and evergreen trees and shrubs and must also achieve a balance between vertical and horizontal plantings. Site obscuring screens or fences may also be required; these are often advisable even if not required by the Code. The required buffer areas may only be occupied by vegetation, fences, utilities, and walkways. Additional information on required buffer area materials and sizes may be found in the Development Code. CITY OF TIGARD Pre-Application Conference Notes Page 2 of 8 NON-Residential Application/Planning Division Section • The ESTIMATED REQUIRED BUFFER WIDTHS applicable to your proposal area are: feet along north boundary. feet along east boundary. feet along south boundary. feet along west boundary. IN ADDITION, SIGHT OBSCURING SCREENING IS REQUIRED ALONG: • LANDSCAPING (Refer to Code Chapters 18.745,18.765 and 18.705] STREET TREES ARE REQUIRED FOR ALL DEVELOPMENTS FRONTING ON A PUBLIC OR PRIVATE STREET as well as driveways which are more than 100 feet in length. Street trees must be placed either within the public right-of-way or on private property within six (6) feet of the right-of- way boundary. Street trees must have a minimum caliper of at least two (2) inches when measured four (4) feet above grade. Street trees should be spaced 20 to 40 feet apart depending on the branching width of the proposed tree species at maturity. Further information on regulations affecting street trees may be obtained from the Planning Division. A MINIMUM OF ONE (1) TREE FOR EVERY SEVEN (7) PARKING SPACES MUST BE PLANTED in and around all parking areas in order to provide a vegetative canopy effect. Landscaped parking areas shall include special design features which effectively screen the parking lot areas from view. These design features may include the use of landscaped berms, decorative walls, and raised planters. cJ RECYCLING (Refer to Code Chapter 18.1551 Applicant should CONTACT FRANCHISE HAULER FOR REVIEW AND APPROVAL OF SITE SERVICING COMPATIBILITY. Locating a trash/recycling enclosure within a clear vision area such as at the intersection of two (2) driveways within a parking lot is prohibited. Much of Tigard is within Pride Disposal's Service area. Lenny Hing is the contact person and can be reached at (503) 625-6177. a PARKING [Refer to Code Section 18.765.0401 �� s 3� REQUIRED parking for this type of use: ��►^ �' °f:C_ Parking SHOWN on preliminary plan(s): SECONDARY USE REQUIRED parking: Parking SHOWN on preliminary plan(s): NO MORE THAN 50% OF REQUIRED SPACES MAY BE DESIGNATED AND/OR DIMENSIONED AS COMPACT SPACES. PARKING STALLS shall be dimensioned as follows: Standard parking space dimensions: 8 feet, 6 inches x 18 feet, 6 inches. Compact parking space dimensions: 7 feet, 6 inches x 16 feet, 6 inches. Note: Parking space width includes the width of a stripe that separates the parking space from an adjoining space. Note: A maximum of three (3) feet of the vehicle overhang area in front of a wheel stop or curb can be included as part of required parking space depth. This area cannot be included as landscaping for meeting the minimum percentage requirements. HANDICAPPED PARKING: All parking areas shall PROVIDE APPROPRIATELY LOCATED AND DIMENSIONED DISABLED PERSON PARKING spaces. The minimum number of disabled person parking spaces to be provided, as well as the parking stall dimensions, are mandated by the Americans with Disabilities Act (ADA). A handout is available upon request. A handicapped parking space symbol shall be painted on the parking space surface and an appropriate sign shall be posted. BICYCLE RACKS ARE REQUIRED FOR MULTI-FAMILY, COMMERCIAL AND INDUSTRIAL DEVELOPMENTS. Bicycle racks shall be located in areas protected from automobile traffic and in convenient locations. ❑ LOADING AREA REQUIREMENTS [Refer to Code Section 18.765.080] Every COMMERCIAL OR INDUSTRIAL BUILDING IN EXCESS OF 10,000 SQUARE FEET shall be provided with a loading space. The space size and location shall be as approved by the City Engineer. CITY OF TIGARD Pre-Application Conference Notes Page 3 of 8 NON-Residential Application/Planning Division Section BICYCLE RACKS (Refer to Code Section 18.7651 BICYCLE RACKS are required FOR MULTI-FAMILY, COMMERCIAL AND INDUSTRIAL DEVELOPMENTS. Bicycle racks shall be located in areas protected from automobile traffic and in convenient locations. SENSITIVE LANDS (Refer to Code Chapter 18.715) The Code provides REGULATIONS FOR LANDS WHICH ARE POTENTIALLY UNSUITABLE FOR DEVELOPMENT DUE TO AREAS WITHIN THE 100-YEAR FLOODPLAIN, NATURAL DRAINAGEWAYS, WETLAND AREAS, ON SLOPES IN EXCESS OF 25 PERCENT, OR ON UNSTABLE GROUND. Staff will attempt to preliminary identify sensitive lands areas at the pre- application conference based on available information. HOWEVER, the responsibility to precisely identify sensitive land areas, and their boundaries, is the responsibility of the applicant. Areas meeting the definitions of sensitive lands must be clearly indicated on plans submitted with the development application. Chapter 18.775 also provides regulations for the use, protection, or modification of sensitive lands areas. RESIDENTIAL DEVELOPMENT IS PROHIBITED WITHIN FLOODPLAINS. STEEP SLOPES (Refer to Code Section 18.775.080.C) When STEEP SLOPES exist, prior to issuance of a final order, a geotechnical report must be submitted which addresses the approval standards of the Tigard Community Development Code Section 18.775.080.C. The report shall be based upon field exploration and investigation and shall include specific recommendations for achieving the requirements of Section 18.775.080.C. CLEANWATER SERVICES ECWSI BUFFER STANDARDS (Refer to R s 0 96-44/USA Regulations-Chapter 3) LAND DEVELOPMENT ADJACENT TO SENSITIVE AREAS shall preserve and maintain or create a vegetated corridor for a buffer wide enough to protect the water quality functioning of the sensitive area. Design Criteria: The VEGETATED CORRIDOR WIDTH is dependent on the sensitive area. The following table identifies the required widths: TABLE 3.1 VEGETATED CORRIDOR WIDTHS SOURCE: CWS DESIGN AND CONSTRUCTION STANDARDS MANUAL/RESOLUTION & ORDER 96-44 SENSITIVE AREA DEFINITION SLOPE ADJACENT WIDTH OF VEGETATED TO SENSITIVE AREA 4 CORRIDOR PER SIDE 5 ♦ Streams with intermittent flow draining: <25% 15 feet 10 to <50 acres >50 to <100 acres 25 feet ♦ Existing or created wetlands <0.5 acre 25 feet ♦ Existing or created wetlands >0.5 acre <25% 50 feet ♦ Rivers, streams, and springs with year-round flow ♦ Streams with intermittent flow draining >100 acres • Natural lakes and ponds ♦ Streams with intermittent flow draining: >25% 30 feet 10 to <50 acres >50 to <100 acres 50 feet ♦ Existing or created wetlands >25% Variable from 50-200 feet. Measure • Rivers, streams, and springs with year-round flow in 25-foot increments from the starting ♦ Streams with intermittent flow draining >100 acres point to the top of ravine (break in ♦ Natural lakes and ponds <25%slope), add 35 feet past the top of ravine' 4Starting point for measurement = edge of the defined channel (bankful flow) for streams/rivers, delineated wetland boundary, delineated spring boundary, and/or average high water for lakes or ponds, whichever offers greatest resource protection. Intermittent springs, located a minimum of 15 feet within the river/stream or wetland vegetated corridor,shall not serve as a starting point for measurement. 5Vegetated corridor averaging or reduction is allowed only when the vegetated corridor is certified to be in a marginal or degraded condition. 6The vegetated corridor extends 35 feet from the top of the ravine and sets the outer boundary of the vegetated corridor. The 35 feet may be reduced to 15 feet,if a stamped geotechnical report confirms slope stability shall be maintained with the reduced setback from the top of ravine. CITY OF TIGARD Pre-Application Conference Notes Page 4 of 8 NON-Residential Application/Planning Division Section Restrictions in the Vegetate Corridor: NO structures, development, construction activities, gardens, lawns, application of chemicals, dumping of any materials of any kind, or other activities shall be permitted which otherwise detract from the water quality protection .provided by the vegetated corridor, except as provided for in the CWS Design and Construction Standards. Location of Vegetated Corridor: IN ANY RESIDENTIAL DEVELOPMENT WHICH CREATES MULTIPLE PARCELS or lots intended for separate ownership, such as a subdivision, the vegetated corridor shall be contained in a separate tract, and shall not be a part of any parcel to be used for the construction of a dwelling unit. CWS Service Provider Letter: PRIOR TO SUBMITTAL of any land use applications, the applicant must obtain a CWS Service Provider Letter which will outline the conditions necessary to comply with the R&O 96-44 sensitive area requirements. If there are no sensitive areas, CWS must still issue a letter stating a CWS Service Provider Letter is not required. f SIGNS (Refer to Code Chapter 18.780) SIGN PERMITS MUST BE OBTAINED PRIOR TO INSTALLATION OF ANY SIGN in the City of Tigard. A "Guidelines for Sign Permits" handout is available upon request. Additional sign area or height beyond Code standards may be permitted if the sign proposal is reviewed as part of a development review application. Alternatively, a Sign Code Exception application may be filed for Director's review. TREE REMOVAL PLAN REQUIREMENTS (Refer to Code Section 18390.030.C.1 A TREE PLAN FOR THE PLANTING, REMOVAL AND PROTECTION OF TREES prepared by a certified arborist shall be provided for any lot, parcel or combination of lots or parcels for which a development application for a subdivision, partition, site development review, planned development, or conditional use is filed. Protection is preferred over removal where possible. THE TREE PLAN SHALL INCLUDE the following: ➢ Identification of the location, size and species of all existing trees including trees designated as significant by the City; ➢ Identification of a program to save existing trees or mitigate tree removal over 12 inches in caliper. Mitigation must follow the replacement guidelines of Section 18.790.060.D according to the following standards and shall be exclusive of trees required by other development code provisions for landscaping, streets and parking lots: Retainage of less than 25% of existing trees over 12 inches in caliper requires a mitigation program according to Section 18.150.070.D. of no net loss of trees; Retainage of from 25 to 50% of existing trees over 12 inches in caliper requires that two- thirds of the trees to be removed be mitigated according to Section 18.790.060.D.; Retainage of from 50 to 75% of existing trees over 12 inches in caliper requires that 50% of the trees to be removed be mitigated according to Section 18.790.060.D.; Retainage of 75% or greater of existing trees over 12 inches in caliper requires no mitigation; ➢ Identification of all trees which are proposed to be removed; and ➢ A protection program defining standards and methods that will be used by the applicant to protect trees during and after construction. TREES REMOVED WITHIN THE PERIOD OF ONE (1) YEAR PRIOR TO A DEVELOPMENT APPLICATION LISTED ABOVE will be inventoried as part of the tree plan above and will be replaced according to Section 18.790.060.D. `"MITIGATION (Refer to Code Section 18.790.060.E.] REPLACEMENT OF A TREE shall take place according to the following guidelines: ➢ A replacement tree shall be a substantially similar species considering site characteristics. ➢ If a replacement tree of the species of the tree removed or damaged is not reasonably available, the Director may allow replacement with a different species of equivalent natural resource value. CITY OF TIGARD Pre-Application Conference Notes Page 5 of 8 NON-Residential Application/Planning Division Section ➢ If a replacement tree of the size cut is not reasonably available on the local market or would not be viable, the Director shall require replacement with more than one tree in accordance with the following formula: The number of replacement trees required shall be determined by dividing the estimated caliper size of the tree removed or damaged, by the caliper size of the largest reasonably available replacement trees. If this number of trees cannot be viably located on the subject property, the Director may require one (1) or more replacement trees to be planted on other property within the city, either public property or, with the consent of the owner, private property. ➢ The planting of a replacement tree shall take place in a manner reasonably calculated to allow growth to maturity. IN LIEU OF TREE REPLACEMENT under Subsection D of this section, a party may, with the consent of the Director, elect to compensate the City for its costs in performing such tree replacement. CLEAR VISION AREA [Refer to Code Chapter 18.795] The City requires that CLEAR VISION AREAS BE MAINTAINED BETWEEN THREE (3) AND EIGHT (8) FEET IN HEIGHT at road/driveway, road/railroad, and road/road intersections. The size of the required clear vision area depends upon the abutting street's functional classification and any existing obstructions within the clear vision area. ADDITIONAL LOT DIMENSIONAL REQUIREMENTS (Refer to Code Section 18.810.060) MINIMUM LOT FRONTAGE: 25 feet unless lot is created through the minor land partition process. Lots created as part of a partition must have a minimum of 15 feet of frontage or have a minimum 15-foot wide access easement. The DEPTH OF ALL LOTS SHALL NOT EXCEED 21/2 TIMES THE AVERAGE WIDTH, unless the parcel is less than 11/2 times the minimum lot size of the applicable zoning district. CODE CHAPTERS 18.330(Conditional Use) 18.620(Tigard Triangle Design Standards) 18.765(Off-Street Parking/Loading Requirements) 18.340(Directors Interpretation) 18.630(Washington Square Regional Center) 18.775(Sensitive Lands Review) 18.350(Planned Development) 18.705(Access/Egress/Circulation) n 18.780(Signs) 18.360(Site Development Review) 18.710(Accessory Residential Units) 18.785(Temporary Use Permits) 18.370(Variances/Adjustments) 18.715(Density Computations) (Tree Removal) - 18.380(Zoning Map/Text Amendments) 18.720(Design Compatibility Standards) !. 18.795(Visual Clearance Areas) 18.385(Miscellaneous Permits) ' 18.725(Environmental Performance Standards) 18.798(Wireless Communication Facilities) 18.390(Decision Making Procedures/Impact Study) 18.730(Exceptions To Development Standards) 18.810(Street&Utility Improvement Standards) - 18.410(Lot Line Adjustments) 18.740(Historic Overlay) - 18.420(Land Partitions) 18.742(Home Occupation Permits) 18.430(Subdivisions) ±X_ 18.745(Landscaping&Screening Standards) 18.510(Residential Zoning Districts) 18.750(Manufactured/Mobil Home Regulations) ?� 18.520(Commercial Zoning Districts) 18.755(Mixed Solid Waste/Recycling Storage) 18.530(Industrial Zoning Districts) 18.760(Nonconforming Situations) CITY OF TIGARD Pre-Application Conference Notes Page 6 of 8 NON-Residential Application/Planning Division Section ADDITIONAL CONCERNS OR COMMENTS: 4-7,2C '� cy-e- .[ r ' �nc'7 LCD'}-�'L P v� /(i'4C/76�Z/ e.-14 v �f ��lu4,,f c'ec-zerie-� G - 4.p o f‹ c t a r) .'L( 1-e.de z- ` LX• 1,4-4 Al--1-0-19„r4/0 .42-44 VIA;Q tr c Q'l�l�-sue PROCEDURE x Administrative Staff Review. Public hearing before the Land Use Hearings Officer. Public hearing before the Planning Commission. Public hearing before the Planning Commission with the Commission making a recommendation on the proposal to the City Council. An additional public hearing shall be held by the City Council. APPLICATION SUBMITTAL PROCESS All APPLICATIONS MUST BE ACCEPTED BY A PLANNING DIVISION STAFF MEMBER of the Community Development Department at Tigard City Hall offices. PLEASE NOTE: Applications submitted by mail or dropped off at the counter without Planning Division acceptance may be returned. The Planning counter closes at 4:00 PM. Maps submitted with an application shall be folded IN ADVANCE to 8.5 by 11 inches. One (1), 81/2" x 11" map of a proposed project should be submitted for attachment to the staff report or administrative decision. Application with unfolded maps shall not be accepted. The Planning Division and Engineering Department will perform a preliminary review of the application and will determine whether an application is complete within 30 days of the counter submittal. Staff will notify the applicant if additional information or additional copies of the submitted materials are required. CITY OF TIGARD Pre-Application Conference Notes Page 7 of 8 NON-Residential Application/Planning Division Section The administrative decision or public hearing will typically occur approximately 45 to 60 days after an application is accepted as being complete by the Planning Division. Applications involving difficult or protracted issues or requiring review by other jurisdictions may take additional time to review. Written recommendations from the Planning staff are issued seven (7) days prior to the public hearing. A 10-day public appeal period follows all land use decisions. An appeal on this matter would be heard by the Tigard � �� . A basic flow chart which illustrates the review process is available from the Planning Division upon request. Land use applications requiring a public hearing must have notice posted on-site by the applicant no less than 10 days prior to the public hearing. This PRE-APPLICATION CONFERENCE AND THE NOTES OF THE CONFERENCE ARE INTENDED TO INFORM the prospective applicant of the primary Community Development Code requirements applicable to the potential development of a particular site and to allow the City staff and prospective applicant to discuss the opportunities and constraints affecting development of the site. BUILDING PERMITS PLANS FOR BUILDING AND OTHER RELATED PERMITS WILL NOT BE ACCEPTED FOR REVIEW UNTIL A LAND USE APPROVAL HAS BEEN ISSUED. Final inspection approvals by the Building Division will not be granted until there is compliance with all conditions of development approval. These pre-application notes do not include comments from the Building Division. For proposed buildings or modifications to existing buildings, it is recommended to contact a Building Division Plans Examiner to determine if there are building code issues that would prevent the structure from being constructed, as proposed. Additionally, with regard to Subdivisions and Minor Land Partitions where any structure to be demolished has system development charge (SDC) credits and the underlying parcel for that structure will be eliminated when the new plat is recorded, the City's policy is to apply those system development credits to the first building permit issued in the development (UNLESS OTHERWISE DIRECTED BY THE DEVELOPER AT THE TIME IN WHICH THE DEMOLITION PERMIT IS OBTAINED). PLEASE NOTE: The conference and notes cannot cover all Code requirements and aspects related to site planning that should apply to the development of your site plan. Failure of the staff to provide information required by the Code shall not constitute a waiver of the applicable standards or requirements. It is recommended that a prospective applicant either obtain and read the Community Development Code or ask any questions of City staff relative to Code requirements prior to submitting an application. AN ADDITIONAL PRE-APPLICATION FEE AND CONFERENCE WILL BE REQUIRED IF AN APPLICATION PERTAINING TO THIS PRE-APPLICATION CONFERENCE IS SUBMITTED AFTER A PERIOD OF MORE THAN SIX (6) MONTHS FOLLOWING THIS CONFERENCE (unless deemed as unnecessary by the Planning Division). PREPARED BY: Le-site-5 f-- CITY OF IGARt PLANNING ION - NAFf PERSON HOLDING PRE-APP. MEETING PHONE: (503) 639-4171 FAX: (503) 684-7291 E-MAIL (staffs first name) a@ci.tigard.or.us TITLE 18(CITY OF TIGARD'S COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT (ODE)INTERNET ADDRESS: www.Ci.tigard.or.us H:lpatty\masters\Pre-App Notes Commercial.doc Updated: 3-Oct-02 (Engineering section:preapp.eng) CITY OF TIGARD Pre-Application Conference Notes Page 8 of 8 NON-Residential Application/Planning Division Section PRE-APPLICATION CONFERENCE NOTES ➢ ENGINEERING SECTION cfa of Tigard,° ,'"nt Shaping (Better Community PUBLIC FACILITIES Tax Mapfs): 25110DB Tax Lofts]: 1200 Use Type: Car Sales/Office The extent of necessary public improvements and dedications which shall be required of the applicant will be recommended by City staff and subject to approval by the appropriate authority. There will be no final recommendation to the decision making authority on behalf of the City staff until all concerned commenting agencies, City staff and the public have had an opportunity to review and comment on the application. The following comments are a projection of public improvement related requirements that may be required as a condition of development approval for your proposed project. Right-of-way dedication: The City of Tigard requires that land area be dedicated to the public: (1.) To increase abutting public rights-of-way to the ultimate functional street classification right-of-way width as specified by the Community Development Code; or (2.) For the creation of new streets. Approval of a development application for this site will require right-of-way dedication for: ® SW Naeve Street to 27 feet from centerline (local street) ® SW Naeve/Hwy 99 to 30 feet ROW radius (or as ODOT otherwise requires) SW to feet I I SW to feet Street improvements: ® Half street improvements will be necessary along SW Naeve Street, to include: ® 16 feet of pavement from centerline to curb ® concrete curb ® storm sewers and other underground utilities ® 5-foot concrete sidewalk with planter strip ® street trees spaced per TDC standards ® street signs, traffic control devices, streetlights and a two-year streetlight fee. I Other: CITY OF TIGARD Pre-Application Conference Notes Page 1 of 6 Engineering Department Section • ® • Partial street improvements will be necessary along SW Royalty Parkway, to include: I I feet of pavement ❑ concrete curb I storm sewers and other underground utilities ® 5-foot concrete sidewalk with planter strip ® street trees spaced per TDC standards I street signs, traffic control devices, streetlights and a two-year streetlight fee. n Other: ® Half street improvements will be necessary along SW Highway 99 (as required by ODOT), to include: feet of pavement ® concrete curb ❑ storm sewers and other underground utilities ® -foot concrete sidewalk ® street trees ® street signs, traffic control devices, streetlights and a two-year streetlight fee. ❑ Other: street improvements will be necessary along SW , to include: ❑ feet of pavement 7 concrete curb storm sewers and other underground utilities ❑ -foot concrete sidewalk I I street trees I I street signs, traffic control devices, streetlights and a two-year streetlight fee. ❑ Other: street improvements will be necessary along SW , to include: ❑ feet of pavement concrete curb ❑ storm sewers and other underground utilities -foot concrete sidewalk I street trees I street signs, traffic control devices, streetlights and a two-year streetlight fee. CITY OF TIGARD Pre-Application Conference Notes Page 2 of 6 Engineering Department Section Other: • Agreement for Future Street Improvements: In some cases, where street improvements or other necessary public improvements are not currently practical, the improvements may be deferred. In such cases, a condition of development approval may be specified which requires the property owner(s) to provide a future improvement guarantee. The City Engineer will determine the form of this guarantee. The following street improvements may be eligible for such a future improvement guarantee: (1.) (2.) Overhead Utility Lines: Section 18.810.120 of the Tigard Municipal Code (TMC) requires all overhead utility lines adjacent to a development to be placed underground or, at the election of the developer, a fee in-lieu of undergrounding can be paid. This requirement is valid even if the utility lines are on the opposite side of the street from the site. If the fee in-lieu is proposed, it is equal to $ 35.00 per lineal foot of street frontage that contains the overhead lines. There are existing overhead utility lines which run adjacent to this site along SW Naeve Street. Prior to final inspection, the applicant shall either place these utilities underground, or pay the fee in-lieu described above. Sanitary Sewers: The nearest sanitary sewer line to this property is a(n) 8 inch line which is located SW Naeve Street at SW Royalty Parkway. The proposed development must be connected to a public sanitary sewer. It is the developer's responsibility to extend the sewer westerly in SW Naeve Street as needed to serve the site. Water Supply: The City of Tigard (Phone:(503) 639-4171) provides public water service in the area of this site. This service provider should be contacted for information regarding water supply for your proposed development. Fire Protection: Tualatin Valley Fire and Rescue District (South Division) [Contact: Eric McMullen, (503) 612-7010] provides fire protection services within the City of Tigard. The District should be contacted for information regarding the adequacy of circulation systems, the need for fire hydrants, or other questions related to fire protection. Storm Sewer Improvements: CITY OF TIGARD Pre-Application Conference Notes Page 3 of 6 Engineering Department Section All proposed development w. the City shall be designed such t' storm water runoff is conveyed to an approved public drains system. The applicant will be rep, to submit a proposed storm drainage plan for the site, and may be required to prepare a sub-basin drainage analysis to ensure that the proposed system will accommodate runoff from upstream properties when fully developed. On-site detention is required. Submit preliminary sizing calculations with the land use application. There is an existing public storm line in SW Naeve Street adjacent to the site. Storm Water Quality: The City has agreed to enforce Surface Water Management (SWM) regulations established by the Unified Sewerage Agency (USA) (Resolution and Order No. 00-7) which requires the construction of on-site water quality facilities. The facilities shall be designed to remove 65 percent of the phosphorus contained in 100 percent of the storm water runoff generated from newly created impervious surfaces. The resolution contains a provision that would allow an applicant to pay a fee in-lieu of constructing an on-site facility provided specific criteria are met. The City will use discretion in determining whether or not the fee in-lieu will be offered. If the fee is allowed, it will be based upon the amount of new impervious surfaces created; for every 2,640 square feet, or portion thereof, the fee shall be $210. Preliminary sizing calculations for any proposed water quality facility shall be submitted with the development application. It is anticipated that this project will require: ® Construction of an on-site water quality facility. Payment of the fee in-lieu. Other Comments: All proposed sanitary sewer and storm drainage systems shall be designed such that City maintenance vehicles will have unobstructed access to critical manholes in the systems. Maintenance access roadways may be required if existing or proposed facilities are not otherwise readily accessible. 1. Contact ODOT to determine what frontage improvements will be required along Highway 99. ODOT may also require an Traffic Study. 2. The proposed driveway location must meet the Access Management standards of the TDC 18.705.030.H.1&2. The driveway is not allowed to be placed within the influence area of a collector or arterial street intersection (150 feet from ROW of Highway 99 to the throat of the proposed driveway). Sight distance certification is required. TRAFFIC IMPACT FEES In 1990, Washington County adopted a county-wide Traffic Impact Fee (TIF) ordinance. The Traffic Impact Fee program collects fees from new development based on the development's projected impact upon the City's transportation system. The applicant shall be required to pay a fee based upon the number of trips which are projected to result from the proposed development. The calculation of the TIF is based on the proposed use of the land, the size of the project, and a general use based fee CITY OF TIGARD Pre-Application Conference Notes Page 4 of 6 Engineering Department Section category. The TIF shall calculated at the time of build. permit issuance. In limited . circumstances, payment of ti,_ CIF may be allowed to be deferred the issuance of an occupancy permit. Deferral of the payment until occupancy is permissible only when the TIF is greater than $5,000.00. Pay the TIF. PERMITS Public Facility Improvement (PFI) Permit: Any work within a public right-of-way in the City of Tigard requires a PFI permit from the Engineering Department. A PFI permit application is available at the Planning/Engineering counter in City Hall. For more extensive work such as street widening improvements, main utility line extensions or subdivision infrastructure, plans prepared by a registered professional engineer must be submitted for review and approval. The Engineering Department fee structure for this permit is considered a cost recovery system. A deposit is collected with the application, and the City will track its costs throughout the life of the permit, and will either refund any remaining portion of the deposit, or invoice the Permittee in cases where City costs exceeds the deposit amount. NOTE: Engineering Staff time will also be tracked for any final design-related assistance provided to a Permittee or their engineer prior to submittal of a PFI permit application. This time will be considered part of the administration of the eventual PFI permit. The Permittee will also be required to post a performance bond, or other such suitable security. Where professional engineered plans are required, the Permittee must execute a Developer/Engineer Agreement, which will obligate the design engineer to perform the primary inspection of the public improvement construction work. The PFI permit fee structure is as follows: NOTE: If an PFI Permit is required,the applicant must obtain that permit prior to release of any permits from the Building Division. Building Division Permits: The following is a brief overview of the type of permits issued by the Building Division. For a more detailed explanation of these permits, please contact the Development Services Counter at 503-639-4171, ext. 304 Site Improvement Permit (SIT). This permit is generally issued for all new commercial, industrial and multi-family projects. This permit will also be required for land partitions where lot grading and private utility work is required. This permit covers all on-site preparation, grading and utility work. Home builders will also be required to obtain a SIT permit for grading work in cases where the lot they are working on has slopes in excess of 20% and foundation excavation material is not to be hauled from the site. Building Permit (BUP). This permit covers only the construction of the building and is issued after, or concurrently with, the SIT permit. CITY OF TIGARD Pre-Application Conference Notes Page 5 of 6 Engineering Department Section Master Permit (MST' This permit is issued for all single ar ,ulti-family buildings. It covers all , work necessary for L .ding construction, including sub-trL s (excludes grading, etc.). This permit can not be issued in a subdivision until the public improvements are substantially complete and a mylar copy of the recorded plat has been returned by the applicant to the City. For a land partition, the applicant must obtain an Engineering Permit, if required, and return a mylar copy of the recorded plat to the City prior to issuance of this permit. Other Permits. There are other special permits, such as mechanical, electrical and plumbing that may also be required. Contact the Development Services Counter for more information. GRADING PLAN REQUIREMENTS FOR SUBDIVISIONS All subdivision projects shall require a proposed grading plan prepared by the design engineer. The engineer will also be required to indicate which lots have natural slopes between 10% and 20%, as well as lots that have natural slopes in excess of 20%. This information will be necessary in determining if special grading inspections will be required when the lots develop. The design engineer will also be required to shade all structural fill areas on the construction plans. In addition, each homebuilder will be required to submit a specific site and floor plan for each lot. The site plan shall include topographical contours and indicate the elevations of the corners of the lot. The builder shall also indicate the proposed elevations at the four corners of the building. '1 ) PREPARED BY: (� - 2. 2 - 6 ENGINEERING DEPARTMENT STAFF DATE Phone: (5031 639-4111 Fax: (5031624-0152 document2 Revised: September 2,2003 CITY OF TI6ARD Pre-Application Conference Notes Page 6 016 Engineering Department Section PRE-APPLICATION . mama REQUEST CITY OF TIGARD 13125 SW Hall Blvd., Tigard, OR 97223(503) 639-4171 FAX: (503) 684-7297 GENERAL INFORMATION CLX -0(/4 /� FOR STAFF USE ONLY Applicant: � IJ Address: 01D _� hone:7 Case No.: PA,,2-60,--( - V Ue►! city: ( � /l / (i rC Zip: Q 72 Receipt No.: 2cD0 f QDS”' Application Accepted By: f 1`.�� Contact Person: Phone: • Date: �l 71 cl •� E'cca6 7-32 Z. Property Owner/Deed Holder(s): `/ / p 6fi<et �l S //AV/A/ )) 79' /C- C ( DATE OF PRE-APP.:PP : a `� D TIME OF PRE-APP.: Address: /y �C 5 ,�� ,33 s) Phone: G3)c1 '5 3?PRE-APP. HELD WITH City: ( /1 x_(, `�1)2 - Zip: 9 '' 2 - 3 Rev 11/8/2002 :\curpin',,masters\revIsed\Pre-AppRequest.doc Property Address/Location(s): / 7 'o • REQUIRED SUBMITTAL ELEMENTS (Note: applications will not be accepted without the required submittal elements) Tax Map & Tax Lot#(s): 2 ,S / I 0 7g t]l zb 0 Zoning: C C ❑ Pre-Application Conf. Request Form Site Size: 3 COPIES EACH OF THE FOLLOWING: f ❑ Brief Description of the Proposal and PRE APPLICATION CONFERENCE INFORMATION any site-specific questions/issues that you would like to have staff research prior to the meeting. All of the information identified on this form are required to be submitted by the applicant and received by the Planning Division a ❑ Site Plan. The site plan must show the minimum of one (1) week prior to officially scheduling a proposed lots and/or building layouts pre-application conference date/time to allow staff ample time to drawn to scale. Also, show the location prepare for the meeting. of the subject property in relation to the nearest streets; and the locations of A pre-application conference can usually be scheduled within 1-2 driveways on the subject property and weeks of the Planning Division's receipt of the request for either across the street. Tuesday or Thursday mornings. Pre-application conferences are ❑ The Proposed Uses. one (1) hour long and are typically held between the hours of ❑ Topographic Information. Include 9:00-11:00 AM. Contour Lines if Possible. PRE-APPLICATION CONFERENCES MUST BE SCHEDULED IN ❑ If the Pre-Application Conference is for PERSON AT THE COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT COUNTER FROM a MONOPOLE project, the applicant 8:00-4:00/MONDAY-FRIDAY. must attach a copy of the letter and proof in the form of an affidavit of IF MORE THAN 4 PEOPLE ARE EXPECTED TO ATTEND THE mailing, that the collocation protocol PRE-APPLICATION CONFERENCE IN YOUR GROUP, PLEASE was completed (see Section 18.798.080 INFORM THE CITY IN ADVANCE SO THAT ALTERNATE ROOM of the Tigard Community Development ARRANGEMENTS CAN BE MADE TO ACCOMMODATE THE Code). GROUP. ❑ Filing Fee S287.00 1 11 Y Ur 111.AISI 13 125 SW Hall Blvd. 4:23:36PM ,.. Tigard,Oregon 97223 ..41-' 11. (50 3)63 9-417 1 Receipt #: 27200400000000000599 Date: 02/17/2004 Line Items: Case No Tran Code Description Revenue Account No Amount Paid PRE2004-00012 [LANDUS]PreApp Conf 100-0000-438000 287.00 Line Item Total: $287.00 Payments: Method Payer User ID Acct./Check Approval No. How Received Amount Pr Cash EBRAHIM DEZFULLI KJP In Person 290.00 Change CITY OF TIGARD KJP In Person (3.00) Payment Total: $287.00 Page 1 of 1 cRcceipt.rpt Pre-Apps (CD Meetings) February 2004 S M T W T F S 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 Tuesday, February 24, 2004 8:00 8:30 9:00 Pre-app 9:30 10:00 Pre-app appt 10:30 11:00 Pre-app Abe Dezfulli 503-524-5433 SDR Used Car Lot 15280 SW Pacific Hwy 11:30 12:00 12:30 1:00 1:30 2:00 2:30 3:00 3:30 4:00 4:30 5:00 5:30 6:00 4:16PM Tuesday, February 17, 2004 ` uz _ / 7 _ oy I . A ivi ertY ING To 9F 7gLo PEA r /v70 A P64-c 0 &05 WESS Ft)fc Ez_c-/N Use P S Of /7- . D'l y LMf l S % o /7 v(. A S MA Lc 01,--/c cr' A 7,12 07( 2 0 7t 30 r"I 3640- ce r-as4 7A CK'r�ll eaeAf/(44 fr-• ; ccZ,(/cci t I %/' GRAPHIC SCALE ° " . s « lie ( Qt fan) 1 I Utah- 30 R i I i f PARKING - 60 CARS i I • SITE AREA (LESS VACATED Rig) - 33,285 s.f. 1 i ,, +. VACATED Rill' - 4,486 s.f. ,• ,,w :7::•,...,.': LANDSCAPE AREA - 9.854 s.f. s, �r' .rr IMPERVIOUS AREA (AC PAVING) - 28.117 a.f. • 'f f■i' _*.tii T 1 . •` 1 1 f ,\ `� f fi T -r • REMOVE= ?*.• 7 a "` �_ N. .f.S. 1= illb "T, `Ariii i , 1,�Hj� I 332E5 S:. � `� AFB �l`% • j �` VIL/VANcER SEPARKTIM / \ ` I / Z E Li u .„,,,,:--.2n 1,ts-' "IiilWitat \glow, - . .-%N\,,..„. - air "111111111111111011/C/vAIR . ..".• 6,a, ---,, ,,., f 44 -.... \ i ..----- 0 75 .: uo;r ±]' GATED 'r , •.. '{ I CL NOTES ` /`[� THIS TOPOGRAPHIC MAP DOES NOT I �• I ��'..+? r CONSTITUTE A 80VNDARY SURVEY. \ ELEVATION DATUM FROM CITY OF TICARD l' SURVEY CONTROL POINT y236, BRONZE DISK, r'Ei1}� }, �, f LOCATED IN S.E. CURB AT CORNER OF . 0.74 ..s \ i I �. � S.W. NAEVE ST. AND S.W. 109TH AVENUE. P. 1I�\ `� \ CURVE DATA 01% ,,, .r pr, ..."'"Ir . y i ?* \�. i:•4 LL:. •i.,7.A1 4,r ADDITIONAL DOCUMENTS U 5D . 02004-C-31D MAi'-24-20105 12:56 FROM:HALSTEADS ARBOR' 503-675-0225 TO:5245433 P. 0102'005 HALSTEAD'S "Sper_ial,sts in the care and ARBORICULTURE preservation of trees" • - CONSULTANTS, INC. r ` David Halstead,Consultant,B.S. Phillip Whitcomb,Consultant 0 * P,O.Box 1182•Tualatin,OR 97062 ai,* (503)245.1383 e May 24, 2005 Mr Abe Dezfull 12587 SW 133` Avenue Tigard, OR 97223 Ph 503.524.5433 FX Cell 503.312.1596 y t Reference: Tree Assessment for Proposed Development p p • N • Location: South Side Naeve Street at the Intersection of HWY 99W, . i 0 Tigard, Oregon i - Subject: Tree Survey/Mitigation Report 4,,,,.. With your approval, I have inspected the site, site plan "Highway 99 Auto Resale" and the trees for the proposed project located on the south side of Naeve Street ++� W at the intersection of HY 99W, Tigard. Oregon. The purpose of this inspection 4f ' was to identify and evaluate the preservation potential of all trees twelve inches . in trunk diameter(measured at four feet above ground) and larger under the forthcoming construction in accordance with the City of Tigard's Tree Ordinance ; ' Chapter 18.150. I have tagged and numbered all trees, both in the field and in this report that will be affected by construction development using 601 through 616 and 618 series .I tags for easy identification The first numbered tree starts in the southeast corner A of the property. ! . TREE ASSESSMENT it, : There are a total of sixteen trees located totally within project boundaries and one major tree located 20 percent within project boundaries. There are four trees less than twelve inches in trunk diameter measured at four feet above ground and are not required to be part of the City of Tigard's uTree 4' Mitigation Identification Program.' Those trees are as follows: 604, 605, 607 and 612. This leaves a residual of twelve trees within project boundaries that are twelve inches in trunk diameter and larger that are required to be part of the City of ,1 Tigard's "Tree Mitigation/Identification Program." Five of these trees are hazardous, should be removed, and will not be mitigated. MAY-24-2005 12:56 FROM:HALSTEADS ARE,ORI 503-675-0226 TO:524593,3 P. 003/005 Page 2 May 24, 2005 Reference. Tree Assessment for Proposed Development Location: South Side Naeve Street at the Intersection of HWY 99W, Tigard, Oregon Subject: Tree Survey/Mitigation Report Of the remaining seven trees that are preservable, one tree is within hardscape boundaries and/or will not survive construction trauma and will need to be mitigated under the City of Tigard's Mitigation Plan. The other five trees are being preserved under the forthcoming construction. Hazardous trees are as follows: Tree numbers: 606, 609, 611, 613, 614 and 616. It is not unusual to find this many hazardous trees on a partially developed site such as this. Most of these trees are growing in an overcrowded situation and have never had any formal care. Most of the hazards come from severe decay, bark inclusions, and multiple trunks formed from breakage caused by winter storms or repeated topping for power lines. Trees that will not survive construction trauma, will be removed and therefore mitistated: Tree numbered 608 &615. Trees that wilt be preserved are as follows: Tree numbers: 601, 602, 603 and 610. Amount of Preservable Tree Retainage - 75%. "Retainage of 75 percent or greater of existing trees over 12 inches in caliper requires no mitigation" according to City Ordinance 18.150.025 - 2b riey-24-±w5 12:57 FROM:HALSTEADS nRSORI 553-6 75-O:E: 6 TO:5245433 P. oc4,ons Page 3 May 24, 2005 Reference. Tree Assessment for Proposed Development Location. South Side Naeve Street at the Intersection of HWY 99W, Tigard, Oregon Subject: Tree Survey/Mitigation Report Tree Numbered 617 dose not exist. As stated there is one tree, a Redwood tree, numbered 618, that is at the apex of the northeast corner of the neighboring property and over laps on to the proposed development project by approximately 20 percent. This tree is the finest species, healthiest and structurally stabliest tree on or near the site. Although there is a proposed driveway within this area and the area is the narrowest portion of the project there is ample room for both providing the tree receives professional arboriculture care. The remaining preserved trees will also survive the forthcoming construction trauma providing their root zones are not overly disturbed and the tree care and preservation guidelines listed below are followed. Tree Care and Preservation Guidelines Before construction begins, preserved tree(s) root zone(s) will need to be protected by the installation of orange colored Tree Protection Fencing out to the canopy dripline of preserved tree(s). Fencing needs to be attached to 7-foot tall steel fence posts placed eight feet apart on center forming a protective line around the preserved trees and fence posts need to be securely anchored in the soil to a depth of two feet, A small diameter cable and/or heavy wire should be weaved and sewn through the protective fencing two feet above ground to secure the fencing. The fencing, as described, will need to be maintained throughout the entirety of the project. Before any work is done within the protected area and/or if the fencing needs to be adjusted due to hardscape construction, it will first require the approval of the consulting arborist and then be supervised on-site. Structural and deadwood tree pruning will also need to be completed during construction site preparation/site clearing in order to make these trees safe for surrounding persons and property. The arboriculture technicians working within the trees will also need to inspect the tree/s very carefully to make sure that preserved trees are well prepared for the forthcoming construction. MAY-24-2005 12:57 FROM:HHLSTEAIDS HRECIRI 5113-675-EE26 TOO:5245433 F. 205/005 Page 4 May 24, 2005 Reference: Tree Assessment for Proposed Development Location: South Side Naeve Street at the Intersection of HWY 99W, Tigard, Oregon Subject: Tree Survey/Mitigation Report Tree Care and Preservation Guidelines - continued After project completion, therapeutic fertilization will be necessary for all preserved trees to help stimulate new root growth from roots damaged during construction and replenish any loss of soil nutrients for optimum tree growth. Hazardous tree removal within project boundaries needs to be completed in a careful manner as to not damage an:y preserved trees. Any tree or existing stump removed within 15 feet of a preserved tree needs to have the stump groundout rather than excavated to reduce overall root trauma. If I can be of further assistance and/or if more technical information is needed, please contact me immediately. Sincerely, .17'4 C?-9 David Halstead BS, CA ASCA ATTN.: Randy G. Hinderer PH 503,806.0346 Fx 503.589.9538 ' • .• .',..;-24-2005 1256 FROP.1:HALSTEADS ARBOR' 503-675-082C TO:524543 P. 001/005 .. ...__.. . . ... ..... ........ .. sH A L ':,.-.',.' ''..E-.A.',.7.,' RC ULTU R E "Specialists in the care and AR BO preservation of trees" t CONSULTANTS, INC. 1-1.....';tead,Consultant,B.S. Phillip Whitcomb,Consultant V * P.O.Box 1182•Tualatin,OR 97062 Sr (503)245-1383 A.4.. , . . •,..- . .- • , . ••• : ,., ,,.:•,.: r:- ' . • , , ((((((( Facsimile Transmission Cover Sheet ))))))) ,. Please deliver the Following five (5) Pages to: ' Mr. Abe Dezfull III 12587 SW 133rd Avenue . I Tigard, OR 97223 ,.I. ,.. Ph 503.524.5433 FX . i / ■ Cell 503.312.1596 3/4 A ■ ' • i. cc.: ATTN.: Randy G. Hinderer 4/ PH 503.806.0346 vek, ,-..? - Fx 503.589.9538 .i . \ COMMENTS: Itittk 1 Reference: Tree Assessment for Proposed Development Location: South Side Naeve Street at the Intersection of HWY 99W, Tigard, Oregon Subject: Tree Survey/Mitigation Report Rewrite as of 5.24.2005 ORIGINALS: Will not be sent DATE 5.24.05 SIGNED: DWH Ph # (503) 245-1383 FAX# (503) 675.0826 RECEIVED MAY 2 5 2005 CITY OF TIGARD BUILDING DIVISION .4 I - 05/25/2005 conditions Associated With 1:58:55PM TIDEMARK Case #: SDR2004-00010 a (SO COMPUTER SYSTEMS. INC. Condition Status Updated Code Title Hold Status Changed By Tag Date By 1 ADDTL ROW DEDICATION NAEVE ST None NOT MET KSM 05/05/2005 DLW2 22. Additional right-of-way shall be dedicated to the Public along the frontage of Naeve Street to increase the right-of-way to 27 feet from the centerline. The description shall be tied to the existing right-of-way centerline. The dedication document shall be on City forms. Instructions are available from the Engineering Department. 1 COMPLETE REQ PUB IMPROVEMENTS None NOT MET KSM 05/05/2005 DLW2 23. Prior to a final building inspection,the applicant shall complete the required public improvements,obtain conditional acceptance from the City,and provide a one-year main ance assurance for said improvements. 1 GN OFF LTR FRANCHISE HAULER None MAS 05/05/2005 DLW2 rovide a sign-off letter from the franchise hauler regarding the refuse facility compatibility. 1 PLN WITH 24'WIDE ACCESS ISLES None NOT MET MAS 05/05/2005 DLW2 2. Submit a plan showing 24-foot-wide access isles in order to accommodate two-direction traffic. All drive isles must be maintained free of parked cars. 1 BICYCLE PKNG STRUCTURE None NOT MET MAS 05/05/2005 DLW2 3. Submit a plan showing the bicycle parking structure to include no less than 2-bicycle parking stalls. 1 BICYCLE RACK DESIGN None NOT MET MAS 05/05/2005 DLW2 4. Provide a plan that shows the bicycle rack designed according to Section 18.765.050.C.of the Tigard Development Code. 1 NEW TREE REMOV/PROT/MIT PLAN None NOT MET MAS 05/05/2005 DLW2 5. Provide a new tree removal/protection/mitigation plan that correlates with the project arborists report. The required plan must be accompanied with a letter from the project arborist that acknowledges his or her review and approval. Any variation from the resubmitted plan will require an additional Type II review. 1 FINAL TREE PROT PLAN None NOT MET MAS 05/05/2005 DLW2 6. The applicant shall submit a final Tree Protection Plan that shows exactly how far the tree protection fencing will be from the face of each protected tree(including those on neighboring properties where construction occurs within the trees'driplines)that will be impacted by construction activities within its dripline. The applicant,through their Project Arborist,shall justify the close proximity of the construction activities to the trees. He shall certify that the activities will not adversely impact the overall and long-term health and stability of each tree. Any construction that occurs within the neighboring trees'driplines should be justified by the applicant and approved by the City Forester and neighboring property owner(s). Work may proceed within the driplines only with the approval of the City Forester. 1 PKNG LOT LITE/ELEV OF SALES OFFIC None NOT MET MAS 05/05/2005 DLW2 7. Submit a plan showing parking lot lighting and an elevation of the proposed sales office that shows windows and point of access. 1 PFI PERMIT None NOT MET KSN 05/05/2005 DLW2 8. Prior to issuance of a site permit,a Public Facility Improvement(PFI)permit is required for this project to cover half-street and any other work in the public right-of-way. Six(6)sets of detailed public improvement plans shall be submitted for review to the Engineering Department. NOTE:these plans are in addition to any drawings required by the Building Division and should only include sheets relevant to public improvements. Public Facility Improvement (PFI)permit plans shall conform to City of Tigard Public Improvement Design Standards,which are available at City Hall and the City's web page(www.ci.tigard.or.us). 1 EXACT LGL NAME/ADD/PHONE None NOT MET KSM 05/05/2005 DLW2 9. The PFI permit plan submittal shall include the exact legal name,address and telephone number of the individual or corporate entity who will be designated as the"Permittee",and who will provide the financial assurance for the public improvements. For example,specify if the entity is a corporation,limited partnership,LLC,etc. Also specify the state within which the entity is incorporated and provide the name of the corporate contact person. Failure to provide accurate information to the Engineering Department will delay processing of project documents. 1 CONST VEH ACCESS/PKNG PLAN None NOT MET KSM 05/05/2005 DLW2 Page 2 of 3 CaseConditions..rpt 42- x"14- /D 05/23/20,05 11:03 50362 9 . �, _ (� f , _ _ _ PRIDE DISPOSALuOMPM�� 74 PAGE 02/03 C p*R *i *D * E DISPOSAL COMPA P.O. Box 820 Sherwood, I 97140 Phone: (503) 625-6177 Fax: (-03) 625-6179 5/18/05 Dezfulli Auto Sales Hwy 99 at Naeve Street Tigard, Oregon I have reviewed your"Revised Trash Enclosure Layon ,"for the Dezfulli Auto Sales location at Hwy 99 and Naeve Street in.Tigard. The location of t e enclosure in your plans appears to be sufficient. Because actual dimensions were not included your submitted plans, I have included our recommendations for construction. Following these specifications will insure adequate enclosure size and access for garbage and recy ling service. • The inside dimensions must be 20 feet across the fro t, and 10 feet deep. • The gates must be hinged in front of the walls, not in ide of the walls, This will allow for the extra 15 degrees in opening angle needed. Full swin gates are required with no center post at access point. • Gates must be able to be pinned in the open and clos d positions to keep the gates from swinging into vehicles. • There must be 75' of unobstructed access to the fro t of the enclosure(no parking island, no parked vehicles, etc) • There must be 25' of overhead clearance. As long as all of the above information is implemented ' the construction of the enclosure, we will approve the design. I Attached is a copy of the Revised Trash Enc. Layout that was faxed to us on this date_ If you have any additional questions, feel free to contact me at 503-625-6177*170 Sincerely, -1.11)a Smiley RECEIVED Pride Disposal Company MAY 2 5 2005 CITY OF TIGARD BUILDING DIVISION Family Owned and Operated C Since 1986 /l G� cr),--L.f- ,% ., '�` �f •u ri4� - r u LU4/LNNANT CHURCH I/ Lri %%% e / i 9 N ij cri � I U-`` ""�__as a. * C:! L.:N. . ll*Att N.,‘. NAEVE a co c.J riMt 4 --. -.____, `—_-�-_-.� AEVE STREET --_A. ____l `moo,___ ,i... , IIIAINFAilk- MeaiOa:KOsPA ''''''''■itectrie I Aik ........... 4,,,,T.-.., .. „ xi-El Crl Ul cn oo !I 494 04,7411. 4._ , ..„...,..,.:,.:,,„,q,:...,_, rri ,,, vJ ..., .,„. .,.....,,•,„ in ,z, ....... , _. .., . co 't;,` AlIPAVIP p■Br.211 —_ — n ae i e © �.; i l lagl -0 ` 1 LAWNMIAS (rrP) - lit> See attached letter listing requirements needed in order to r. meet standards necessary for adequate size and access. )_6-25--- S 1 Julia Smiley m Pride Disposal Company P .' 3 99xttf 1-5-b4e n r ~ �Yg1 g .dwg b5r16/2445 08:55:07 AM w -•.1Hwy wasnington County,Oregon 2005-084042 RETRUN RECORDED DOCUMENT T" 07119/'^^5 12:50:18 PM CITY HALL RECORDS DEPARTMEI D-DC Cnt■1 8tn■8 RECORD81 CITY OF TIGARD $20.0 -o sii.00•Total a$37.00 13125 SW Hall Blvd. Tigard,OR 97223 111111111111111 1 1111111 11111 11111111111 II NDIVIDUAL 00801694200500840420040049 I,Jerry Hanson,Director of A merit and Taxation and Ex-Officio County Clerk for Washington County, ''t.'-'..... `` Oregon,do hereby certify that the within Instrument of .' rr Z.,A writing was received and recorded In the book of A"t•-' A File No. $ /� ? DU y—DO VI 0 :�I T , :� records of said county. ; bfal S.d T yG 1� Jerry R.Hanson,Director men/and Taxation, L;� Ex-Offlclo County Clerk ....1.: '+ DEDICATION DEED FOR ROAD OR STREET PURPOSES Space above reserved for Washington County Recording Information 5HA H IN 8 EZiLPriAltA Ie.. F ZF Ut'1`1 does hereby dedicate to the public a perpetual right-of-way for street, road, and utility purposes on, over, across, under, along, and within the following described real property in Washington County,Oregon: Attached Exhibit"A" To have and to hold the above-described and dedicated rights unto the public forever for uses and purposes hereinabove stated. The grantors hereby covenant that they are the owner in fee simple and the property is free of all liens and encumbrances, they have good and legal right to grant their right above-described, and they will pay all taxes and assessments due and owing on the property. The true consideration for this conveyance is $0.00. However,the actual consideration consists of or includes other property or value given or promised which is the whole consideration. IN WITNESS WHEREOF,I hereunto set my hand on this / 3'f h day of t1 iiLy ,20 V 5 li ''-ir, ' k q4,41 S-\'‘-f.^- 61f2fU Signature Signature 125(2,'1 5t.,3 1339"° Pr E. 152 So 5W 'Rc(Flc. t-\tv1Y Tax Statement Mailing Address Property Address --I(.,Ae-o , 02 g'1 213 71 0Al2D, oR 91113 STATE OF OREGON ) )ss. County of Washington ) This instrument was acknowledged before me on e7/13/0 5 (date)by: 5 11a-h t n cold d E bra-1,1 i f'>'1 -D e Z CAJ 1 (name of person(s)). } ':';'.• ,r .i r i(iA_::,L rL r," " CHERYL A CAIN ES" .` ' NOTARY PUBLIC-OREGO I N N}k COMMISSION NO.371603 Notary's Si tyre MY COMMISSION EXPIRES AUG. 14,2007 ff11 .. My Commission Expires: ,AVI�t&S 4 i y ,a 00 7 tL Accepted on behalf of the City of Tigard this �M day of, --I v / 207,7_e'5 62_EA.12....."...M.7 ity Engineer Document2 11111111111 111 11111 2005-84042 EXHIBIT "A" RIGHT OF WAY DEDICATION S. W. NAEVE STREET A tract of land located in the S.E. 1/4 of Section 10, T. 2 S., R.1 W. W.M., City of Tigard, Washington County, Oregon and described as follows: That Portion of Parcel 1 of Land Partition 1996-010 (Survey No. 27,163) and a portion of that vacated roadway referenced in Document No. 2000-99598 within 27.00 feet Southerly of the centerline of S.W. Naeve Street which centerline is described as follows: Beginning at the intersection of said centerline with the Easterly Right of Way line of S.W. Pacific Highway thence S. 63°06'17" E. 200.18 feet to a 166.00 foot radius curve left, thence 56.42 feet along the arc of said curve through a central angle 19°28'19" thence S. 82°34'36" E. 80.33 feet to a 166.00 foot radius curve right, thence 103.93 feet along the arc of said curve through a central angle of 35°52'16" thence S. 46°42'20" E. to the intersection of S.W. Royalty Parkway, containing 1,937 square feet more or less. REGISTERED PROFESSICN AL LAND SURVEYOR . %ice OREGON AUGUST 22, 1975 Donald W. Thurston 1044 Renewal date 30 June 2006 111111111111111111111 111 III 2005-84042 Fnd. 5/S" IR Down 0.2' Or( In Unknown (Reported as 3/4" IP SN 2597 and Partition Plat 1996-010) Held for I Easterly R.O.W. Pacific Highway EXH 6 PROPOSED STRE S.E. 1/4 SECTION 10, o"� , Existing ROW Line GI TY OF T 1 GARD, NASH 1 N • Fnd. 5/5" IP w/ RFC, 11/4. \/`/ "LS 1044" 5N 27,163 ' sT ,;) 2 0 ^ 563° ,U '' /� _ /66 0 of 06/> \ 9'00 x5626'°9, H _ 4� V N in in_0• .?3c,0 X63 06, ` 56,/4, - Proposed ROW Line 4/3 58654 Q� 2 Aria 180.34! S] PARCEL I Land Partition 1996-010 cri 589°47'41"W 269.45' �t�� Cr 0 Fnd. 5/8" IP w/ RPG [269.54'] (269.45' 5N 3557) Fnd. 3/4" IP� Si53 06, Cr "LS 1044" 5N 27,163 /740 Z. ✓ r Fnd. 5/8" IP w/ F m m A "LS 1044" 5N 21 Area of Proposed Dedication o I,93-1 Sq. Ft +/- CO v N N \\p. O 0 O 0 1 \/ LEGEND Fnd. 5/S" IR w/ YPG , ' o 4"-i 0 Found (Fnd) Monument as Noted [YR 2000] N. .Q7 0 Fnd Monument In Box [YR 2000] IR Iron Rod �V/ �0 I Iron Pipe O/ I, v RPG/YPG Red or Yellow Plastic Gap SN Survey Number 0 — — — Geneterline / Proposed Right of Way / — — — — Utility Easement ROW Right of Way • _____ NSt - M r r IIl\i 11111E V III — 2005-84042 T "B° ET DEDICATION c REGISTERED T. 2 S., R. I W., V"I"M" PROFESSIONAL LAND SURVEYOR ETON COUNTY, OREGON � � �� ; t �� OREGON AUGUST 22, 1975 ,DONALD W. THURSTON 1044 DATE OF RENEWAL 30 JUNE 06 Fnd. 5/5" IP w/YPG In Monument Box 33' R ' —E7— ry 4 ,'3$5.00' SCALE I" = 50' �` cH,�393%6r Fnd. 5/8" IP w/YPG ry ` ??4, In Monument Box CURVE DATA O R = 25.00' 2,, \ 0 = 124°0313-1" _ L = 54.13' R , -. \ CH = 44.16d /g o , - 0 , 4. �`3SDO `• Cl/`666,6r N\ \ >\ Fnd. 5/B" IP w/YPC%\ 6Q�o,` k in Monument Box at j , >� intersection of Naeve St. x, r • , \ (reconstructed) and /� �; 6° SW Royalty Parkway. /,165 \.S'1". \� `o �' - �'pp F 0 \2 q\`� \ Fnd. 5/8" I P w/YPG y��,2t, In Monument Box &°\l �°\112 1. d Fnd. YPG stamped N. Westlake Consultants" In Monument Box at West .-- O, N53._ end curve at intersection of 5.W. Naeve 5t. t IgOth Ave. 0 6,/7h' Held For center of street. ■\ Fnd. 5/8" IR Down 1.8' �3 0.8' Bent, 5N 26122 Held • Fnd. YPC stamped "Westlake Consultants" In Monument Box. 2? Held for center of street. SO N. \1. N "o \ \° pz, THURSTON tf ASSOCIATES, INC. \ 415 N. STATE ST., SUITE 120 \ LAKE OSWEGO, OR 017034 N PHONE (503) 6017-0757 5°32"52"W 170 D0' _ , 29 Jun 2005 -�1 Job No. 1074 5c11 Zoo(-1-000!0 Ct, l mf+ HALSTEAD'S ARBORICULTURE "Specialists in the care and preservation of trees" CONSULTANTS Davud Halstead. Consultant 8 S PO Box 1182,Tualatin,OR 97062 • Phone (503)245-1383 t -, April 27, 2006 Mr. Abe Dezfulli 12587 SW 133`d Avenue Tigard, OR 97223 Ph 503.524.5433 FX w Cell 503.312.1596 Reference: Tree Assessment for Proposed Development ' Location: South Side Naeve Street at the Intersection of HWY 99W, � Tigard, Oregon ' 4 " Subject: Tree Survey/Mitigation Report ' With your approval, I have inspected the site, site plan "Highway 99 Auto Resale" • and the trees for the proposed project located on the south side of Naeve Street 4 ?• • at the intersection of HWY 99W, Tigard, Oregon. The purpose of this inspection ' was to identify and evaluate the preservation potential of all trees twelve inches in trunk diameter (measured at four feet above ground) and larger under the forthcoming construction in accordance with the City of Tigard's Tree Ordinance Chapter 18.150. I have tagged and numbered all trees, both in the field and in this report that will be affected by construction development using 601 through 618 series tags for easy identification. The first numbered tree starts in the southwest corner of the 1. 44 property. I TREE ASSESSMENT ' There are a total of seventeen trees located totally within project boundaries and one major tree located 20 percent within project boundaries. There are five trees less than twelve inches in trunk diameter measured at four feet above ground and are not required to be part of the City of Tigard's "Tree Mitigation Identification Program." Those trees are as follows: 604, 605, 607, 616 and 617. This leaves a residual of thirteen trees within project boundaries that are twelve inches in trunk diameter and larger that are required to be part of the City of 1 Tigard's "Tree Mitigation/Identification Program." Seven of these trees are hazardous, should be removed, and will not be mitigated. Page 2 April 27, 2006 Reference: Tree Assessment for Proposed Development Location: South Side Naeve Street at the Intersection of HWY 99W, Tigard, Oregon Subject: Tree Survey/Mitigation Report Hazardous trees are as follows: Tree numbers: 606, 609, 611, 612, 613, 614 and 615. It is not unusual to find this many hazardous trees on a partially developed site such as this. Most of these trees are growing in an overcrowded situation and have never had any formal care. Most of the hazards come from severe decay, bark inclusions, and multiple trunks formed from breakage caused by winter storms or repeated topping for power lines. Trees that are preservable are as follows: Tree numbers: 601, 602, 603, 608, 610 and 618. As stated there is one tree, a Redwood tree, numbered 618, that is at the apex of the northeast corner of the neighboring property and over laps on to the proposed development project by approximately 20 percent. This tree is the finest species, most healthy and structurally stable tree on or near the site. Tree Care and Preservation Guidelines Before construction begins, preserved tree(s) root zone(s) will need to be protected by the installation of orange colored Tree Protection Fencing out to the canopy dripline of preserved tree(s). Fencing needs to be attached to 7-foot tall steel fence posts placed eight feet apart on center forming a protective line around the preserved trees and fence posts need to be securely anchored in the soil to a depth of two feet. A small diameter cable and/or heavy wire should be weaved and sewn through the protective fencing two feet above ground to secure the fencing. The fencing, as described, will need to be maintained throughout the entirety of the project. Page 3 April 27, 2006 Reference: Tree Assessment for Proposed Development Location: South Side Naeve Street at the Intersection of HWY 99W, Tigard, Oregon Subject: Tree Survey/Mitigation Report Before any work is completed within the protected area and/or if the fencing needs to be adjusted due to hardscape construction, it will first require the approval of the project consulting arborist and then be supervised on-site. Structural and deadwood tree pruning will also need to be completed during construction site preparation/site clearing in order to make these trees safe for surrounding persons and property. The arboriculture technicians working within the trees will also need to inspect the tree/s very carefully to make sure that preserved trees are well prepared for the forthcoming construction. After project completion, therapeutic fertilization will be necessary for all preserved trees to help stimulate new root growth from roots damaged during construction and replenish any loss of soil nutrients for optimum tree growth. Hazardous tree removal within project boundaries needs to be completed in a careful manner as to not damage any preserved trees. Any tree or existing stump removed within 15 feet of a preserved tree needs to have the stump groundout rather than excavated to reduce overall root trauma. Sincerely, Philip Hickey CA #1604 David Halstead BS, CA#059 HALSED'S AIRECRICLILTURE corism.TANTs . HAZ TREE CHARACTERISTICS GIME . _.._ -- --- Tree Number: 670/ Species. -es: tiN_.2-76ri,44 Botanical: .— - --_ Z- ' Da:....2_, D131± (-3 Tmrdcs: / Height ft)(----r" usa tilib SPrd: Crown Class: Dominant: -Z Co-Dominant: Included: Special:Specimen: Historic: Street Tree: Indigenous: - Health Rating: 60 Structure Rating:( ( Root.Structure Rating: (20%-40% Haztree--50%-70% requires profesional care) Pruning Histmy:Pro Care: Crown Reduced: Flush Cuts: Topped: — .. -. f:• tors: ..7.-.- •• .•'ir.:4' . ..-.,4amnouneng fac . ... . . •• , _ • . . „. CROWN DEFECTS: Indicate presence of keine/sat defects and rate their saverity( severe-nri=moderate. ow)_. ' DEFECT ROOT CROWN TRUNK SCAFFOLDS BRANCHES • Poor taper Bow.sweep Crideinklinisiforics krultipie attachments Inducted bark Excessive end weight Cracks/splits 71/ /V) . Hangers S. s i- . Gineng Wounds/seam iii 44 . - Decay 04 .••.• Cavity •-- , Conksimushroomebracluet • .• '.• feeedingisap . • , , .... • ' .,' Looseicracted bark .•.:;....,. ,.•, Nesting hod/bee hive :;;;:....".•' i•••'•:,...:,., Deadwood/stubs 5- .--5- • .-. ..._ , Previous faiksre ill P'l HAZARD RAT1N13.:164i:j- -.deg.From vertstal 0 natteal 0 unnakral 0 sel.ccurected Soil bearing: Y if Lean direction:--- (.4.. .........■ • Tree pan most Likely to fag Faluse poterdiat 1-row;2-rnerfarm 3-trighc 4-severe Inspeclion petloch annual blamer:31 other Size of part 1-<6"05 ant 2-6-18-(t5.45.col)... /AZ Failure Potential•Size cri,Pan•Tager Rasing=Hazard Raring 3-18-3D-(45-75 cork 4->3fr 05Wiii.-sl.:4,. flilf + + Target ratincs 1-ooze:Mal us=2-intemilliW16*,::•::,-.: .. 3-frequent us=4-use -.•;•....:.:: ....11'.' :•:"•`:4;4-4-'"„•:•:\`.:.• IL14PIRARMENIBIT • .: :,.. -,-!.:..:'::: -.....;!i.::•!..:17:::...*::, PI!Wet 0 renove defecil*posGM reduce eat-weight fif QOM dean 0 thin 0 raise campy 0 cams reduce 0 mitructies .a shape '' •,.:•`;:::;:„...•;;.:4'. ..„ inspect further: 0 roe crown Chia*'47aerial•0 rnonflee•g,:-'4•::. ainttieo nee: 'if .:- .. •' • Reb—a I' N Move Target 1' N Other: ,•. : ....'. Efiset on am a madame ... ,..... . Notification: 0 WIWI D El governing agency Data ' .".-.• ..... . .,..• .•... . • ,,• ,. ...- • -'• •..,. - . ...,„ / COMMENTS /t/Lt el./r 0 c/..0 - SiViCt2-1 A/;/l, I' COA,11-i 0(1.-r-4.cit. C6qc>i • -.. —1 it 4 r•-/ ......,....• IIMMO klaIP u LE3410 wean pot D :Javaal riadlaq Adowitt asopmpus 0 azipas um=0 Moo=capes :MG • - • lobe fiuttuatio6 Ambesnia'NNW um geoNNON cnaneAs 0 Manta- LIO=W3 N A Wale"anon N :.. N A man CIAOLUBS nneistlespo.: 1■11 0 lueoP twartIt ligfaa&PLm=Mal 0 isedige3aPP afkowai 0 :atilLief. =sn wanba4–c r=Sri puripe:33D— labsei * 0.0f■Atto SL-S14 jle-111.–£ -Z 4UDL).9 -I. wed jo aps flfilsoita-Z:man Wgisliod aintre-A . r.- TJI.Nai Ma* PsezeH=6Mekl abej+Melo azIS+juao aintreA —javo — fenuteesq mum—13oped uocpacisut 4tei� AMU Isom Ved N-A :fitt!Asall PDS PaPatimitzs 0 genet=0 imalleu 0 felVaft mud tPaP 9NI1V21 WWI( r aingel Sall4A2Sd slmtifsrlifamMile3 sitlefsainumlfsztupEl scintsffloamPest3 aNLI eaRIPIN eultsaN Weq PaPerriasocn molt des/BeaPaat13 laippAISILTOD.11.1.5MLIMUCta umsawspunoAfk 14A sm-toNvzie stuuoU2 toticilsPietxruivP00 dams'meg Jattelitald 133330 (mom"ales9pOlihall-asoms.$)Angass ipaLp ales FM=clap enp pui:simkija Nmozio SITIO-131MS 10.401131.00t1 mtopel.Buipuncwittion "• • Veddttly1 :PacinPati UMW3 :am 3 ald:LICEPH fiuiunjd . . . (amo seuotsexid saqnbai %OL-%09--earizeH %0V-%0 ) :OUPBei ainpw 10011 ampruls 57 tupeel imeaH :snoueflipui :awl wags 311°I.S1H us w Pad S:iePad9 :papnpui queumocho3/7 queuKuoa :ssen unicup :WS gun estl Afix44 I, 1,2_ 4-180.71:150 4831uBiNI -v,tv-,y2,'", :spade -24 3aquirtN sau. - SEIM SMISIZEUMSVICI SIDNIVISHOO Minilli313821V SARSISW14 Agit- ZVI ZVH HAZ - GRIC� CONSULTANTS 7 Gum Thee Num ben 6Qi n,f.e,4'I-f,9- eatantat - • D Tninks: / Heim !sub Sped: ZS/� Crown Class: Dominant ` ' Co-Dominant: Included: Special Specimen: Historic Street Tree: Indigenous Health Rating: ( Structure Rating.,,Root.Structure Rating: (20%-40%Haztree--50%-70% requires profesional care) - Pruning History:Pro Care: Crown Reduced:—Flush Cuts,L Topped: .:Compounding factors ' CROWN DUCTS:indicate presence of in avidual defects and rate the seveiiy(r e.rn=moderate.mow) . riEFt-CT : ROOT CROWN TRUNK SCAFFOLDS BRANCHES hourteper • Multiple attachments Irtduded harit Excessive end weight Crackslsppls Girdling' Wounds/seam Decay ,,... Canty Conkstrmishriximsthrackel Blearing/sap low :: toosehzadted bark Nesting holdlhee hive r Deadwpod/stY�a 1en , Cankers/gaits/hurts .BnrasltmrrttTsslants �, Pirko!faihns M L_ HAZARD RATIN tN4it - deg,From vertical 0 natural CI sanaaaa 0 Sou heaving: Y N Lean dkectlors: Tree part most lively to Fad •;' Pilule t-tar,2�rnedasrr 3tiytS 4ia(i!!e �w' tnspeciion pestod:_annual biannual other sat of pant t-<S(t5 an); 2-6 t♦ .{ 6emk 7� - Failure PotS taI+Size oE_ t+Target Rating=Hazard Riling 3-18 31F(4x75 cask 4->�'(75 cm) �lli / • + Targetralug t—occasional ruse 2—inlenuktent use; 3-6m�uesrtnrse;4—aorsianluse HAZARD ABATEMENT Kti • • Prune: D remove deceit a plot' 0 seduce end weight 1 aosrn dean Q till Q raise campy II an reduce 0 mdn ct••e 0 shape + • Ca6ia(Btace Inspect further. Cl ram crown II • decay 0 aerial 0 monitor Remove tree Y.. N Replace? Y N Moue Target Y N Other •.J. Effect on Kt `II none 0 evaluate • Notification: 0 owner El manager II governing agency Data: / /It J /P l F r I 0, PC �.y. yf '. • - : CONSULTANTS TREE «U Tree Number. 6041 Species: ( h f o t •pBFt 7 Truce I Crut Lob tea: ,/s Crown Class: Dominant: Co-Dominant: Included: Special:Specimen: Histories Street Tree: Indigenous: Health Rating:?r Structure Rating:Z:c./.Root.Structure Rating: (20%-40% Haztree--50%-70% requires profes(onai care) _ Pruning i-iStonl:Pro Care: Crown Reduced: Flush Cuts: T ___ Compounding favors CROWN DEFECTS: Indicate preence of individual defeats and rate thee-severity( mode e.low) DEFECT ROOT CROWN TRUNK SCAFFOLDS BRANCHES Poor taper ran:sweep Multiple attachments r htdtded bark Excessive and eight Cracks/splits rT Hangers Girding - Wounds/seam Decay C Conks/merstrmomvluacke! S 1 s • Bleeding/sap Dow icracked hark Nesting hoidltee time Deadwood/stubs / S anrers/ternutesfants - Cankerstalisflarris Prevtm>sfamae .. . J HAZARD'RATING lasti f deg.From vertical Q natural Q unnatural ral O Sri flr>wfing: Y -N Lean direction: Tree part most likely to fait .23-41 e"_c Fa> p 1-bvg 3• S 3 1 Inspection period:_a eeral �i biannual other Size el parr 1-48(15 cast 2-8-U (1$45 Oak IAA Farlae ;Size ot4Par[+Target Raring=Hazard Rating 3-18.11T(45.75 oak 4->30•(75 cm) .)nly I _ /t? Target rating 1—occasional usm 2—intermittentuse: 3—frequent nt use: 4—constant use HAZARQPAATir Prune: 0 remove defecitopert Q reduce end weight 0 crown clean 0 thin 0 raise canopy 0 omen reduce Q restructure ❑shape CabtWBrace: Inspect fa:the= 0 mat crown 0 decay ❑awful eYruurlisr • Remove tree: `ft;P1 Replace? Y N Nave Target Y N Other: Effect on adjacent!Teem 0 none 0 ermte Notification: Q owner Cl manager O governing agency pats: COMMENTS nocvi9PE./ 70;flpe11 ARECRICULTURE CCNSULTAIITS HAZ 'MEE CHARAC1ERISTCS GUME Tree Number Species. Botanicat: (1 DGL: DEM: I Trunk= / Height L104-7-- Die Lrob Sold: (-) Crown Class: Dominant: Co-Dominant: Included: Special:Specimen: Historic Street Tree: Indigenous: Health Rating: 7P Structure Rating 12L) Root.Structure Rating: (20%-40% Haztree--50%-70% requires profesional care) Pruning History:Pm Care: Crown Reduced: Flush Cuts: Topped: •"• -Compounding factors: • "CROWN DEFECTS: krcticate presence ott.J. fects and rate they saventy( severe rre=moder-ate. criv) .-. •DEFECT ROOT CROWN TRUNK SCAFFOLDS BRANCHES Poor taper Bow.seelqi . . •..::,,,131atkiiilkteritsgorke . . Included bark EXCBSSiVe end weight Cracks/splits Hangers • Girdling • Woundslseam • Decry Cavity Conks/mushrooms/bracket i• asap 110,1 Loose/cracked bark GrK)_ 'Nesting hokUbee hive Deadwood/stubs e--•r • gorersiternatesiants Cankers/gags/burls Prevtousfailure - — HAZAIDRATING .1iLvt rips Roniversc21 o natural 0 unnatural( 0 5a-corrected Soil heaving: Y Lean'direction: Tree pan most likely to fait Fart potentiak 1-look 2-rnerinsic 3-higic 4-severe Inspection period k annual bannval Size of part 1-.:6"(15 an); 2-6-18-(15-45 an); JAZ FakasPotenfial+Size°Wart.Target Rating Hazard Ratingclher 3-13-31)-05-75 cart 4->30'(75 an) )nly Target ratinrx 1—occaskintd us=2—intern, - 3—frequent us=4—constant utile:4.1.7's.; • .."•';4•, •• HAZARD ABATEMENT • •: . •. •. • ••• . • • - • • f.';i0•••• • • •••••; Prune: 0 remove defecitveporCI;educe end weight E3 an dean 0 thin 0 tans scampi. El men seduce ET eshueons ...141.abaatir' Cabtemraca. Inspectiurther: 0 root crown di**1:4011110 110451.ff .t Remove it= Y.14 •,.•Replace? V N atom Target V N Otte= Effect on adival****,.-IiIsona 0 evaluate • ." • . NotifIcattum 0 atnitIO ;osapoirs. CI governing agency Date: . . COMMENTS • .;•• "- - 447(.J /' 1.:-e i / (kr g e - c/ • yrp •• • fr .. _ HAz tALS1EErS AREICIRICULTURE COPISULTMITS ., "RREE CHARACTEMSTICS GUIDE .... _ - --- ---,r- '•- - Tree thneber: (i;06 ilif_f•V-14(64 - - SIMON: ck. Botanical: .--- • ; ..•,- # - : Truk:sI Height 7— pd- G- P.T Crown Class:Dominant: ,VCo-Dominant: Included: Special:Specimen: 1-listoric: Sheet Tree: Indigenous - — Health Rating: r Structure Rating:__7D Root.Structure Rating: (20%-40%Haztree--50%-70% requires profesional care) 7 Pruning Ristorii:Pro Care: Crown Reduced: (, Flush Cidm (../-"opped: t- .,1,icompotnading factors: _ .- , 7 CRONIN DEFECTS:Indicate pre of inchvidual defects and rate their severity( severe.nvrnoderafe: ow) OEECT ROOT CROWN IRONIC SCAFFOLDS ' BRANCHES •,. , : , 40K WAIN) ::::y.-tOrbilatinenbrifodes . ,?.. . .....I.Z3nCluded bark .:'. xessive end werght - `?acksf31?.!#s _..,.1 . • VVounds/seam - ::::,',..,:" .l::: I-: 'L• ,- Decay S -r Cavity S ,:-•:,..":.:;.•,...:::::.;,:f,-.. , :',..,•..:4 Conks/mushroombracet ' --, ..?":':'::':`::;::::.::;•'. ..:. .-.- Bearing/sap*ay : ..: t''.'.•• Looseicracked bark - . ::,-",.*:.7•1::.-e'. Nesting hold/bee hive S _c . '..'..'' 'Boreasiterriclesfants L erikerstallsiburis •'",,---:. Previous failure ,- . . •.: :'"... HAZARD RATING:lisfui-::— --'. : deg.From vertical El natural CI unnatural 13 self-conected Soil heaving: Y N Lean direction:.—.. . 7r:::,-.::,34.:'‘,!■il..ii1"..! ...... -'• Tree part most likely to fait „Cf9e12l-621/17/1\ -11Z--44 e 047(-0,,, Fare 1-bow-2-inecrunrc iiiigii 44.0■44:1!:::;,....:',. . . . ..... Inspection peno& arornial biannual other_ Size of part -1--c6-(15 an)-, 2-6-18-(15iieV;;,. :: ._. fAZ Fatlurelotenhai*Slas niPairt+Target Raring= R _r _ring )nly ., :1 + 4--/ = Target/alerts 1-occasional us=2-iniellell90.1,1 "": ......_ „, _ . . 3-kenel*MC 4-cDTPani 40.1.1:1' •• ..'HAZARD ABAltilliair . . .. prune: r himove dereakim:05, a seduce end weight 0 caws dean 0 thin El raise caxopy 0 anon seduce 0 reseactuire: .,........,. t:..3"...,;0tibtelBrace: . : .11;?,: Inspecitteriber: 0 nerd crown Elder*: kenlovEr tree: Y.,:k:.: !. ...:-'.Replace? Y N leave Target Y N Other . ,-.';'''....-.:'.. . ...:":.:".4,'*:::1....:.'',":-!...*:::%.!",......, ::::• .....t.:4.i..: ;Effect on adiaces**111.1 ";Di ri evaluale Notification: Cictediel.tlwirriNger 0 governing agency pate: , ...- . . ; " ` vs-:"..- '?.... .",•.''':..''.. : COMMENtS V ei--, ,7 Li c(-7,,,A —G/cee_t A;c-el /,.,'Ly ((V) / • . ••.--- 1-47411i10 S ,..../...:.: ,,-- .. .. • HAZ HALSTEAD'S Allot CULTURE CONSULTANTS ULTANTS // TREE _pp / MADE -- - Tree Number. 6(7 Species; D f t Gi Bordt� tai: _ DGL:ZV pew Trunim• 1 .Height ys'-r-Dia Lab Ste: 2s—/ Crown Class: Dominant: LZCo-Dominant: Included: Special:Specimen: Historic Street Tree: Indigenous: Health Rating:.7) Structure Rating:17 Root.Structure Rating: (20%-40% Haztree--50%-70% requires profesional care) Pruning History:Pro Cane: Cut Reduced: Flush Cuts: Topped: Compounding far"ors CROWN DEFECTS: Indicate presence of individual defects and rate their savaity(s-severe.m=moderate.Iow) DEFECT ROOT CROWN TRUNK SCAFFOLDS BRANCHES - Poor taper Bow.sweep Cks Multiple attachments Included bark EXCessiwe end weight Cradu-fsp�ls tea*• '1 • Wounds/seam - Decay Cavity Conkshnushmomvbrackei Bleeding/sap flaw Lcosefaacked bark Nesting hold bee hive Deadwood/stubs BorerJIffirmtesfants Cankersigaiislbwis Previous failure L` HAZARD RATING deg.From vertial O natural Q aatnahra Sad + ] • `` heaving: Y N Lear direction: /- lJ Tree part most i0teiy to fat Fadrae pp 1-tar,2 3liigic 4-severe Inspection permit_ annual biannual other Mme of pest 1- (15 an) 2-6-18 (15-45 an}: IAZ Failure Potential+..Size of 5 art+Target Racing=Fwd Rating 3-18-34'(45-75 cn*4->30'(75 cm) )Illy +'' = Target raliirg: 1—occasional use:2—intermittent use; 3—frequent us= 4—cOnSiantuse IAZJ I' AT • =f ;!PMMte: D remove ove delel jklµ• Cl reduce end weight� 3 rwser a dean 0 thin 0 rase caracpy assn seduce ❑res rrctse ❑shape 'r• .ti „{fib s4Brace: 6tspectitor8rer: 0 root sawn 0 decay 0 aerial•0 monitor • {••••, w ° move tree: Y:11: .Replace? Y N Move Target Y N Otlter_ • s' Effect on Game Cl evaluate Notification: Qdil* Dtteeneger 0 governing agency Data: • COMMENTS ) , ..: ra,c :... .. • • HAZ ARECRICUL1 CONSULTANTS p T GUIDE Tree Number. &?) Species ,£JIJ Jj,7 '( Botanical DGL _ I'7 ,r Trunk= I Eta Lmb Sped 217 Crown Class: Dominant: Co-Dominant: Included: Special: Specimen: Historic Street Tree: Indigenous: Health Rating:567 Structure Rating: J7) Root.Structure Rating: (20%-40%Haztree--50%-70% requires profesional care) _ Pruning History: Pro Care: Frown Reduced: Flush Cad Topped: . ..,Compounding factors •�';.. • "r'CROWNDEFECTS: Indicate messy=of Inckvirhsal defects and rate he severity( -severe..rimrooderate.F=lora •.DEFECT ROOT CROWN TRUNK SCALDS ' BRANCHES Poartaper • Bow.9Nel* • IAuldPia aUar�rrrkexrLs ..kiduded bark . Etcessiw rind weight Hangers • • Gtnfllng - Wounds/seam _ Decay Cavity • • Conkslmusivaornahracket asap Bow Loose/cracked bark Nesting holdlbee hive D®dwoad/sh S • •BaersJtermdeslaNS t;:Gankerstgalls/huriz ..pnivious fame ... ..HAZARD RATING LEA • deg.From vertical Q natural. Q uratahra! Q sell•corrected SoA heaving: Yid Lean dFrecUon: Tree part most likely to fait Fedora patentla€t boor 2 3�dgliv 4-severe inspection'i' pe _ annual Dual other S mear part a-<s(u am 2-s-aa- .cmk . fAZ " Failure PotenSe+Size°mart+Target Ra&ig=Hated Racing 3 1&•317(4575 cmk 4->3r(75 an) Target ratinw 1-occasional use 2-intermittent use; 3-frequent mac 4-constant use • HAZARDABA7i NT Paine: D remove d1 ft !¢R.''.Q mime cod weigh/toam dear rt-. 0 rase canopy Cl sown reduce cestncture 0 shape Cable/Brace: Inspect-further: Q root crown Q decay ❑aerial'Q rrranlAor • Remove tae 7C'.Ni'•'' ... Replace? Y N Move Target Y N Other. • - Effect on adiagel*Slie,lig011a 0 effaitale Notification: Co rrla■ IQttlw�- Q gavelling agency hate: . •J/f /'I V'Y `. ��(/,y('��',('y/ �' \/ 1' ^( �� %�_(1 r�I �'I 4r 2-\/474-- i V' c lam- �! li � '„••� • Y �` 2 f ( • H�4Z / T1 C TITS Ted CliARACreaSTICS c --- -_- .• .._._ . � Botanical: _ ...••.Tree Number: V® Speges: •J C D/4G/ /�4� DGL s? f Trunk= I Z-s Via 1mb Spld: 7S- Crown Class: Dominant "Co-Dominant: Included: Special: Specimen: Historic Street Tree: Indigenous: • Health Rating: 5)0 Structure Rating: Root.Structure Rating: (20%-40%Haztree--50%-70% requires profesional care) Pruning History:Pro Care: Crown Reduced: Hush Caft Topped: -Comuounding fors: ,.CROWN DEFE CTS: Indicate onmence of indrvidml its and rate their severity(s=sew immoderate.ma* - - ., '� Roar CRD4Rt TRUNK SCAFFOLDS BRANCHES taper Bow.sweep Codoartriantsgazirs lEuWple attachments j-- Inc ed bark s ril EXCeSSive end weight - • Cracks/splits S Hangers.• • Girdling' - Wounds/seam Decuy 5 J s Cavity s s Conks/mushrooms/bracket • Bleeding/sap> Loose/cracked bark \ S Nesting hold/bee hive Deadwood/stubs 5 J f Borerslfarrrrants ::: erstailslbusis ; i f S HAZARD'RATING tall '. deg-From vertical 0 natural 0 0 Soil,,/, heaving: Y N Lean direction: Tree part most likely to W • '1)'- d•� 4./f C^ ea ` • Faille moist 1-fovr 2-fnedxart 3-tigtn 4;ithere 1�' polo annual biannual other S�of part 1-- (15 an); 2-6-1S�t 545an) /AZ Failure Potentrai+are°Wart+Target Rating=Hazard Raring 3—18-"3O {4575 ant 4->30"(75 an) �IIJy • 7 + '+ `�- / = /�' Target rating 1—oaasiors!usm 2—iMelmlftent user 3—frequent us= 4—constant use:......" HAZARD ABATEMENT ,}>r ':c. . Prune: 0 remove defective pert 0 reduce end'Height 0 crown dean 0 thin 0 raise canopy 0 Gown reduce 0 restructure e 0 shape •'!''''''-; am Cable/Brace: brsI:eed further: 0 root aural D der* 0 aerial•0 monitor. ''> Remove tree: Y' N: Replace? Y N tiiove Target Y N Other Effect on adjacent n iefc-0 none 0 evaluate Notification: 0 owner 0 manager 0 governing agency pate: ' -,-... COMMENTS /7 r-=- L `/ / . / iii i&-r 7 m i c 6', 12) n;N • ,4..0/ - lj�Uv� t2 - kr-Ls r f I cL / % /l1 Jl(._ frA sc HAZ AFIECRICULTURE CONSULTANTS .. Tree Number (0 I 0 Species: park Z �1 rP ,r Botanical: / I _ : S} DB �lt - � Trunks: l Height Sb Fr tla Lmb Sped: i," -/— Crown Class: Dominant: ‘/ Co-Dominant: Included: Special:Specimen: Historic: Street Tree: Indigenous Health Rating: f Structure Rating.j Root.Structure Rating: (20%-40% Haztree--50%-70% requires profesional care) Pruning History:Pro Cane: Crown Reduced: Flush Cut s Topped: Comnowidfng factorrt CROWN DEFECTS: Indicate presence of kinkedual defects and rate their severity( severe. .ow) DEFECT ROOT CROWN TRUNK SCAFFOLDS BRANCHES Poareplr Baal,sheep j 1_ � Codtrgrtslfrssks •/ Multiple attachments kri�ed bark Excessive endu a t Cracks/splits Hangers Girdling Decay Cavity . Conks/mushrooms/bracket Bleeding/sap flaw !Loose/cracked bark F./fettling hold/bee hive 'Borerslternutesfarts j ''`�Previous fakes .%HAZARI RATING _ _ _ �.From vertical O natural ❑unnatural O Sou heaving: Y N Lean direction: • . Tree past mast likely to talc tom10"' e e - Failuae poientiaE 1-13vc 2-medium 34 4•saiislB Inspection paint_annual _ biannual other Size of part 1-<s(15 cm):2-&-18':(1/3 5..cink. , IAZ {Failure Poteniall+,s6ep(part+Target Retin9= 3-18-30(45-75 colt.4-ri air. ) l'ily * = Target rates 1—occasion*use 2—tntennIttaniee 3—bequent us=4 ClRsianlas e�.., HAZARD?ARATEMENT Pntne: n remove defective part ❑reduce essi weight )"aa'"n dean ❑than 0 raise eaocgr 0 croion reduce 0»>$u chse ❑straps: ..,:? Cable/Brace: Inspect further: 0 root alma Q decay D aerial..Ltkllortlior Remove tram N i...Replace? Y N Move Target Y N Other: Effect on adjameMireew-❑node 0 emanate Notiftcatlon: D clemer Q manager 0 governing agency Data: COMMENTS X70, p i.c/eiPr, y,t -,' /~7/?:.:Z2,--7 e-?e /,)r'n;�-/ e‹.J J— CJv ,lj - 11-..: , HAZ ARBCRICLILTURE CONSULTANTS Tree Number. (G'// speces:f 0�'I,�6� y �/ � Botanical:�car_ > 21 Thinks: s Hem y-5-F-r-Dia flab sped: Z t7 Crown Class:Dominant: v Co-Dominant: Included: Special: Specimen: Historic Street Tree: Indigenous: Health Rating: 9P Structure Rating: / Root.Structure Rating: (20%-40% Haztree--50%-70% requires profesional care) - Pruning History:Pro Cabe: Crown Reduced:_Flush Cutm Topped: • ,,Compounding factors: ..CROWN'DETECTS:ate presence of incfmidual delects and rate their severity(severe.utmoderate.maw) DEFECF ROOT CROWN TRUNK SCAFFOLDS BRANCHES Poor taper Baer.stveep � . CodaztinaNS6mtcs Multiple attachments ( C S Included bark '>C �• Excessive end weipM Cracks/splits Hangers Girdling • Wounds/seam a- - Decay Cavity Conkstniushroomsrbraebet • Bleeding/sap how Loose/cracked bark Nesting hold/bee hive Deadwood/stubs S c B xers/hirrni6esfards Cankerslgafis/bruis Previous fadlse - HAZARD RATING Lill `- - deg.From vertical ❑natural CI unnatural O sel€aoaected Soil heaving: Y N .Lean direction: Tree part most likely to oaf -7-4/ f- /Ce G+ / J r j Failure potendat hoar 2-rne q 34ti*4-severe Inspection per_ annual biannual ether Sze of part 1-<6"(15 ant 2-a-'rtls•16-an); iAZ Failure P9tential+Sze )nljr afi P t+Tager, =liOza:d Ong 3-1831(45-75 anx 4->31(75 cm) 2 / 1 Target rab 1-occasional tie:2-intermittent use 3-frequent use:4-constant use .:..; :' HAZARD ABATEMENT K`c;, Prune: 0 remove defective par Cl reduce end weight 0 crown clean 0 din 0 ram canopy 0 crown cerium C restructure LI shape Cable/Brace: Inspect further: Q root cram Q .:r , Remove tree Y;.N Replace? Y N Move Target Y N Other '� Oaerfat manitoF *, '. Effect on a OPINI C•OOOOtS II evaluate Notification: 0 aslillet n'pulleger O guven ng ageruy pate: die .(� �� S 47 ct 0 t)1 r +ter• • HAZ" HPL53i1:3tD S Amt !Ci#_T A,.TAWTS Tit GUIDE ._ --- --- Tree Number. 2 Species: / ' '� Botanicah DGt_-Zo a DBFb /y Tram / Height 7,c)f/ Ma Lath Spud: '0/ Crown Class: Dominant: Co-Dominant: ✓Included: Special:Specimen: Historic: Street Tree: indigenous: - Health Rating: G Structure Rating U Root.Structure Rating: (20%-40% Haztree--50%-70% requires profesional care) •_ . Pruning History:Pro Care eC Crown Reduced: Flush Cut Tamed:• Compounding-1- ..ors: irJ_ • . . Y:AGWAf DEFE CTS: Indicate presence of individual dew and rate Omit'saaerity(�severe.mmoderate.mow) . DEFECT ROOT CROWN TRUNK SCAFFOLDS BRANCHES Poor taper Bow.sweep Codomn§w ics ' Multiple attachments Included bruit Eccessites endweight Hangers • Girdling 4 Wounds/seam Decay Cavity Conkshnush oontsibrackct • asap flow - . . Loos@/Q �a[ bark .. f Nesting holdfbee hive .<':.. Deadwood/stubs s --c Barmsilermifasfanis Canicerslgalisfbcais Prisdpusfatk.e Waft. RATING j«j ::` deg-From vertical 0 ratcaai O unnausat O Sod heaving: Y i Lean direction: .. _- Tree pan most Rely to fait 1--;;;AA) L Failure potenfat 1-ken,2-madame 3-higir:4sec!ere trrspeciion prd annual biannual odder Size of part 1-<ti HALSTED'S AREICREULTURE CO4SULTANTS . HAZ• J MEE CHARACIERBSTICS GUM - - _ . n. Tree Number: 6/z - Speces: — fie fda,-- Csacle L Betanicat __., DGL ( 1:1 DI3it 2,... Trunks: 1 Height 4/0/-77--Da Lash Spud: Zo/ - Crown Class: Dominant: (- Co-Dominant: Included: Special:Specimen: Historic Street Tree: indigenous: _ • Health Rating: 7 C Structure Rating: MY Root Structure Rating: (20%-40%Haztree--500/0-70% requires profesional care) • . Pruning Elistopi:Pro Care: Clown Reduced: Bush Cuts: 1---/ropped: - : ,_...... ._ . ,,Compounding factors: ... CRGWN DEFECTS: Indicate presence of Individual dean=arid rate their seventy( severe.nr=moclerale.i=lrev) TRUNK ' SCAFFPLa BRANCHES :•,,I.,*Kamen . ::.:„.ffadominanisitosics Multiple attachments ' Included WA... ..., ,• ExceszallaindIright fr; ......, , Cracitsfardb .,. liangetS •.. • Woundsiseam Decay _C C Cavity S c Conkshzushroomsrbracket • ' Bleeding/zap dour •- :' ., '•Looseicracked bark • 1' ‘ _ .. ., L :..: ,Nesting haldIbee hive 5Ir ..itEi Dorersitematesfants .• Cankers/galls/buns • Previa/ablaze ... _ _ ‘. ... . • ;.; '• .....4.HAZglittl RATING liwi: - --'. deg.Rem vedimd 0 ratural 0 unnatural 0 self-corrected Soil heaving: V N Lean dIrectlom _. ,..........immerme. .: f• -)1 \•, Tree part most nicety to tat (_ J L''',.., r--) Faftse poandiat 1-low;2-mel5unc 3-tligh 4-severe , Inspection mooch annual biannual ocher .•- Sze oi part 1-<6'(15 an): 2-8-18'(15-45 an); ,"rr ., . IAZ . Failure Potential+Size_rair+Tasget Rafang=Haalecl Railing 3-18-.31T(45-75 cog 4->31r(75Cm) _NOY L/ + + -/ = /(2 Target rating 1-occasional us=2-internattenetaa . / 3-frequent use; 4-constant tatiq.,...„ '+4,i)f,4.T.•'' HAZARD ABATEMENT . . .., „,-,1.:•....;,,:. .,...4. ,Prune: 0 remove defecate pad;;0 reduce end wei)s. 0 crown dean 0 thin 0 raise campy 0 anon rechz:e 0 restructure 0 shape ,;'''"." •:1. ...,:%:'• inspect further: 0 root wren 0 decay 0 aerial 0 monitor '; ":.''''••1 r::::' Remove free: lo:Id Replace? Y N Mom Target Y N Other . . ;....:.,:,:..I.: Effect on adiac,cipesev 0 none 0 evaluate Notification Gnawer 0 maroger 0 governing agency Date . .",1 :i.. ::•:.!r•4.' ::::7: IS - .. ! I..: . ,......,..k.... ..:::.- '.." ' . . ••• :' COMMENTS , ' 1 7.■ 0 r- .r c./ ..)-e 1)4,/- i , 4 "rA.I API r•.-, 41 • . ------- Q Ia. A4., ' Vty ----1/6-- _ Cli tY_ p-/ 7,7 1 /j.)-■ .,.: ArjElft-e-v /I,Ai r--- 1.40E-a fq•-)1- .-- —Aa j 7 • HAZ HALSTEAD'S ARBORICULTURE CENSULTAIITS TREE CHARACTERISTICS GIME - -- > T — ree Number: G2/C- S es: )79_i„ c- Ar pec2 Botanical: DGL: D131t Minim I Height 217 7- um Lath spot Crown Class: Dominant: Co-Dominant: Included: Special:Specimen: Historic: Street Tree: Indigenous: Health Rating:„L Structure Rating:2A-j Root.Structure Rating: (20%-40%Haztree--50%-70% requires profesional care) Pruning History:Pm Care: Crown Reduced: (---hiush Cuts: (----"Topped• • Compounding facms 1. _ • • CROWN DEFECT& Indicate prmience of individual defects axt rate their severity( severe.in=moderate. 1:rar) ROOT CROWN TRUNK SCAFFOLDS BRANCHES Poor tsper BOK sweep IMultiple attachments Included bark Excessive end weight -Cracksfsplits Hangers Girtliktg Wounds/seam Decay Cavity Conksimushroarrisibracket • Bleerfinglsap Saw Loosacracked bark : Okmarg holdibee rave DeadwoocUstubs 3orersnermiIds(ants Cantaxstgatisitrtals 'effraWasiffaiwe _ — 147.ARD RATING.:71;imii - deg.Finny vertical 0 natural 0 lanianial 0 self-conected Soil heaving: Y Lean direction: ,.■.=••,1aramisinlyeer• Tree part most likely to fait C '`-\) Foliose notentiat 2-maturix 44Maire Inspection pent= annual biannual other Size of past 1- (15 cm); 2-6-18135415 cm); IAZ Failure potstiai+Size of...Vart 4.Target Rating=Hazard Raring 3-18-ar(45-75 oink 4->311(75 cm), '2n1Y —4— 4- Z-- + 7t Target ratincs 1-occasional iss=2-iarinninent uses 3-frequent us= 4-constant use "'", "• lowitemvuerierr 7.-At Prune: remove nefedimemt 0 reduce end weight 0 dorm dean 0 din 0 rase canopy 0 amen redime 0 restructure 0 shape .7 CabiefBrace: • Inspectfinthec 0 rod dawn 0 decay 0 aerial 0 monitor Remove dew Y N P-i-' me? V N Move Target Y N Other Effect on agnes*Imisir-Dinue CI evaluate I- , Notification: iiiwginger 0 governing agencY Date - COMM te. /11_ ulA71-1 / /0,(:r •(/ /1-- r'd •- HAZ ;,� S��. �c T Tree Number. _ (,ff _ Species; ko)(71-iir Bctanica: _ L, t -> /.1 Thu 1 Height a-17— Via tm F-7— Crown Class: Dominant: i- -Co-Dominant: Included: Special Specimen: Historic Street Tree: Indigenous: Health Rating:_ Structure Rating: Root Structure Rating: (20%-40% Haztree--50%-70% requires profesional care) • Pruning :Pro cane: Cit~Mrrt Reduced: ' Flustt Cut 1-- Topped: `---- • ,-Compounding factors: ,:CROWN DEFECTS:Indicate presence of kidtvidual defects and rate then severity(5=severe.m=moderate.how) DEFECT ROOT CROWN TRUNK SCAFFOLDS BRANCHES Poortsper • Bow We= COINintinantsgorks S Mullple attachments � ed eedt s 1 C J Hangers • Girdling Wounds/seam 1 S Decay c C Cavity Conkslmebtuoams,b ac ket Bleeding/sap lbw _ Waselaacked bark 'I Nesting holdlhee hive Deadwood' S .,' :,. aotersitemot esfarris Cankers/galls/hurts Pnrfoutfaise ' HAZARD'RATING;i-a - deg.From vertical 0 natural 0 unnatural ❑ Soa ha;viwg: Y !! Lean direction . '' (Tree part most likely to fait Cr),,;n) Failure potenta 1-tour.2 .p rraeduaS 3airjl,tC falMefl= J�� Inspection penult_annual biannual other Size of part 1-<S(15 an):2-6-1a:{�S:eal, ` IA FadurePotenhal+Size of:Part+Target Rasng=Rased Rating 3-I&'31T(45-75 ant 4->31F(75cm) )n1y cl + ? + C_I = /c Target rating. 1-occasional use 2-inlaimiflent use; / 3-frequent us= 4-constant use . _' t'tAZARI APAT�{�' �.• Prime: 0 sa:wve ett:'O t end 0 sown dean 0 thin d rase campy O canna redce ❑restructure ❑shape n:';•' i>. Cabte/Uraca: Inspect ftrther II root arum II desaY II a�iat II monifoc, irk *:_ Remove tree: Y N Replace? Y N Wow Target Y N Other. Effect on adjacent tres*-0rem 0 evaluate notification: 0 owner 1:1winger 17 goverrmg agaxy Date :` "• COl4tME�i7 s (gri7 �1 / �L to/ 41- HAZ f Ti's . Tree Number pecies: r Lr s(7./'ri J 1)r// t Da: L 1.1 u / Height 2LV Eria t s 7-orr Crown Class: Dominant: Co-Dominant: = _ - . . _ HLSIE10'S ARi3ORICUL111RE C131P4SULTAPITS .. HAZ 'FREE ClIARACTERISTICS GLIDE ___ _ _ - ......._. -_ . _ / 1,-2 Tree Number: v 1 / Species:....6,7e-i-vi..,- iii -/ Botanical: , - .- DGL:-to 4'-DB1-1: 7 ir Trunks: I Height-.70-F7- MaLsrth SPId: Z-Ut-i / Crown Class: Dominant: Co-Dominant: i-- Included: Special:Specimen: Historla Sheet Tree: _Indigenous: Health Rating: Yi2' Structure Rating: -57; Root.Structure Rating: (20%-40%Haztree--50%-70% requires profesional care) - Pruning Historii:Pro Care: Cram) Flush Cut=— Topped: - : 7.,...., ■•■•,......1 .. ■ .S.- . ,..Compounding facto= _ • • ,1 ".CROWNDEFEC73:Medicate presence Glint/midi:al defects and rate the saveity( severe,m=moderate.)=kno) . . DCT SCAFFOLDS BRANCHES ROOT CROWN TRUNK PriOrtaper:-: ".:,,-- ''.-,:-..;::".rt:?..,ii,•'-''.::;:': .. ":eaw.lvosep ; t ....: :.:-:.: ,,:•.' . .. _ . - . 4- patad . . ...*:•.'Included bark : .:'- 'Excessive endvselght• . , , . .' - . •:.:k Girdling '- . Wounds/seam - I- '''. •• Decay Cavity Conitarnushroomsihradret • .".'... '.."' ::',.:.:i. ° Bleeding/sap lion ,_ . :. - : ?.•';',::..-4,••!* ' ..i -,..: Nesting hold/bee hive .. Deadwood/stubs i __S- .... ...,.•:Confreragails/busis - . _ ., ,. - , • - : . • ..." .;:: -ii.::'' ;HAZARD RATING LENS', .. . ; deg.From vertical 0 nabral 0 unnatural 0 self-corrected Sod heaving: 'Y +I Lear direction'-.........• Tree tart most Direly to fait Falwe patendat 14ov.:2-merream 3-lig=4-eleffeis..;1 r., ••••', -. ... :- Inspection permit annual biannual _____other_ Size of part 1-46115 ant 2-8-1811S-40 cip ,, FAZ Failure Potestral-I.Size of&art.+Target Ratng=Hazard Manna 3-18-31T(45-75 east 4..a•••10"OS'Ottf. int?' , 1.;, ' . - Target values 1—occasional use 2-•!niesilititiO(00.4'.; 3—frequent use 4—ithisfint iltilli.,,,,,, Iti‘ZAREIJOAVONIENT : :i,;:..'..• ::'.;.,,......;; ;;;t.-.,. Prune: 0 remove defaitliittert>.oreduce end weight 0 crams clean 0 thin 0 raise cagloPT Cl conn reduce Cl astruebeia: .a.#1111111:":''' ::..!.`",:':.. •f".",;. I n s p e c t f a r t h e r 0 r o o t c o v e r 0 decay '0:atrial f ...."'•....;.,...:. Remove Vow Y N .:: .%Replace? 1' N !dove Target Y. N Other. . :. ...•... ..: .,'41';: ',2,:.‘',.1..,:'1., '.: :„..:,,.'4,;. •.;I...,::Effect on adjace1!iweet7'anon a evaluaie lgotmeagolo a(Nile a 1Willagol a governing ageneY Data: COMMENTS AP '0/4 . ...•_ ' ... , • (-7,, - '.'.:7:. ..:- '.. : .*:?..1'.;:*". ..; .4 t e . ■ (-e( -4..1, Ae. Jz47,--,c,-10)f I e . .gi;* .-.r:‹r . . "":::;•J--: , .. ... I, : (y-- ,-7 , , -/--/iPli." . A • •., HAZ A LTUIE TINTS Tree Number 61 Species: k.�Q U0iC4... • Botatt cat- 11.DGI.: Oat n m pna: ftJF-i- Crown Class: Dominant: Co-Dominant: Included: Special:Specimen: Historic: Street Tree: Indigenous: Health Rating: v Structure Rating: 71 ,Root.Structure Rating: (20%-40% Haztree--50%-70% requires profesional care) Pruning History:Pro Care: Crown Reduced: Ruth Cuts Toted: . Comootmdfng f-agors: ,.CROWN DEFECT indicate presence(direr/kiwi dew and rate their severity( -severe.m=rnodcrate.flow) DEFECT ROOT CROWN TRUNK SCAFFOLDS BRANCHES ``Poo�Onlaper :ate1r1.11) ; brks . :: fiAultlple 2ttacftrnmfv tyrrwsiva endvreirt Itanfle s • Wamdslseam Decry Cavity • Conkslmushrownslbracket sap flaw ese+rsac red bark - mNesting holdlbee hive Beachwood/stubs Boreratar piecfanis calkersigallsiburis .,:RnrfMrsfaikae � . N, r HAZARD RA ING deg.From VW1I I 0 natural ❑ d Sod heaving: Y �! Lean direction Tree part most likely to fait Failure potential 1-orr;2irttrnamt;34dgft:4-severe .Inspection penoct_ annual biar.,uar other sise of part 1-<s(15 an);2-6-18-(15-45 coat); , 'IAZ Failure Potential• She DEEM.T (45-75 ant 4->30'(75 �tza�cj=Hazard Rating 3_ig.� t, Dnhy _ Target rat:g 1—occasional use 2—inlenWfhhBnt use:: •,.' 3—frequent use: 4— l idle; ,.': ttAZAR.D ABATEMENT `,;r; • Prune: ❑remove :,:Q reduce end vs 'rigid Q aown dean Cl thin 0 ra Se canopy 0 aeon reduce 01ncbae 0 shape t CableiBraca: ice! ha_spectfir:>fter Q root crown Q decay Q aedelf 61081111- Remove tree: Y:N • P---7 Y N Move Target Y N Other_ Effect on a thin lC!."O now D awe Notification: QptAldr O-...gar C govara5 agerxy Date: •/.� +///fir e w.�N:• j �..•• „Cheryl,Caines-TPZ `5fp — Page 1 r.�1)1:42 0 0:4 WO I U From: "Phil Whitcomb/HAC inc.” <hac @spiritone.com> To: <cherylc @tigard-or.gov> Date: 6/2/2006 7:13:25 AM K C1 Subject: TPZ V /� June 2, 2006 JON 0 b, C�t Op 2 ?446 N�iNG/e/yell RD O NG Mr. Abe Dezfulli 12587 SW 133rd Avenue Tigard, OR 97223 Ph 503.524.5433 FX Cell 503.312.1596 Reference: TPZ BI-Monthly Reports Location: Naeve Street/HWY 99W, Tigard, Oregon. Subject: Inspections and BI-Monthly Reports I have inspected the site, site plan, preserved trees and their TPZ fencing for the purpose of compiling with the City of Tigard's Tree Ordinance Chapter 18.150 and found everything satisfactory. In addition, I have put into motion the TPZ reports for Naeve Street/HWY 99W, Tigard, Oregon per the City of Tigard requirements. (See enclosed) This report will suffice as the first"BI-Monthly Report"with a beginning date of June 1, 2006. Sincerely, David Halstead BS CA#0146A CC.: Cheryl King rd-heryl Caines -TPZ Page 2 City of Tigard, Oregon Ph 503.718.2437 ATTN.: Mr. Matt Stine, City Arborist 13125 SW Hall Blvd. Tigard, OR 97223 Fx 503.684.8840 THE FOLLOWING CONDITIONS SHALL BE ONGOING REQUIRMENTS THROUGHOUT THE PROJECT FROM ON-SITE IMPROVMENTS TO FINAL BUILDING INSPECTION Submit to the City Forester: ATTN.: Mr. Matt Stein, City of Tigard, Oregon 13125 SW Hall Blvd., Tigard, OR 97223 Fx 503.684.8840 Ph 503.639.4171 ext. 2589 60: The property owner/applicant and their assigns are responsible for complying with the following requirement: The Project Arborist shall inspect the site at a minimum of every two weeks, and at times when intrusions into the TPZ are required. The Project Arborist shall submit written reports to the City Forester a minimum of once every two weeks, as he monitors the construction activities and progress. These reports shall include any changes that may have occurred to the TPZ as well as indicate the condition and location of the tree protection fencing. If the amount of TPZ was reduced, then the Project Arborist shall justify why the fencing was moved, and shall certify that the construction activities to the trees did not adversely impact the overall and long term health and stability of the tree(s). If the reports are not submitted or received by the City Forester at the scheduled intervals, and if it appears the TPZ's or the Tree Protection Plan is not being followed by the contractor, the City can stop work on the project until an inspection can be done by the City Forester and the Project Arborist and appropriate remedies can be imposed, If necessary. This inspection will be to evaluate the tree protection fencing, determine if the fencing was moved at any point during construction, and determine if any part of the Tree Protection Plan has been violated. � 'lvr CITY OF TIGARD OREGON July 26, 2006 Abe Dezfulli 12587 SW 133rd Avenue Tigard, OR 97223 RE: Dezfulli Auto Sales 15280 SW Pacific Highway File No.: SDR 2004-00010 Dear Mr. Dezfulli: This letter is a reminder that your PFI is ready to issue, pending your declaration of a contractor. Please let me know if I may be of any assistance in your project. Thank you, Act Maris Buxton Permit Coordinator 503-718-2453 c: SDR2004-00010 Land Use File 13125 SW Hall Blvd., Tigard, OR 97223 (503)639-4171 TDD (503) 684-2772 c_o p City of Tigard, Oregon 13125 SW Hall Blvd. • Tigard, OR 97223 May 7,2007 N Ebrahim Dezfulli 12587 SW 133rd Avenue T I GARD Tigard, OR 97223 RE: Dezfulli Minor Modification MMD2007-00015 Dear Mr. Dezfulli: This letter is in response to your request for approval of a Minor Modification ( ID2007-00015) at 15280 SW Pacific Highway,WCTM 2S 110DB, Tax Lot 1200. You have requested to m �d the site by increasing the size of a building from 350 square feet to 672 square feet. The ong' building has not been built yet but was approved by the land use decision SDR2004-00010 (Dezfulli Auto Sales) for which you are still meeting conditions of approval. A pre-fabricated permanent building is permitted in tie GG zone. The submitted plans reflect the current and proposed conditions. Analysis of Modification Request: Section 18.360.060 of the Tigard Development Code Site Development Review chapter states: "Any modification which is not within the description of a major modification as provided in section 18.360.050 shall be considered a minor modification." Section 18.360.050 states that the Director shall determine that a major modification(s) has resulted if one (1) or more of the changes listed below have been proposed: 1. An increase in dwelling unit density or lot coverage for residential development. The proposal does not involve residential development. Therefore,this criterion does not apply. 2. A change in the ratio or number of different types of dwelling units. The proposal does not involve residential development. Therefore,this cntenon does not apply. 3. A change that requires additional on-site parking in accordance with Chapter 18.765. The use, Motor Vehicle Sales, is required to provide 1 space per 1,000 square feet of building floor area and no less than 4 spaces. The applicant originally proposed a 350 square-foot building; therefore, four spaces were required. The proposed increase m floor area to 672-square feet would not increase the required parking because the building would still remain small enough that only four spaces would be required. Therefore, the proposed modification is not a change that requires additional on-site par-king. However, the applicant is responsible for providing the required number of parking spaces, which must include 1 disabled-accessible space. The site plan shows that the increase in building floor area will remove some parking spaces,incruding the only disabled-accessible space on site. Therefore, the applicant shall revise the site plan to indicate the location of the four required arking spaces, which must include 1 disabled-accessible space. Per the land use approval SDR2004-0001 , the disabled-accessible space shall be 5 feet from the main entrance of the building. 4. A change in the type of commercial or industrial structures as defined by the Uniform Building Code. The proposed 672-square foot building is a pre-fabricated permanent building. The original proposed 350 square-foot standard building had not been built yet. Therefore, there could not be a change in the type of commercial or industrial structure as defined by the Building Code. In addition, the change from a standard to pre-fabricated building does not qualify as such a change per the Building Code definitions. 5. An increase in the height of the building(s) by more than 20 percent. The applicant has not proposed to increase the height of the building. Therefore,this cntenon does not apply. 6. A change in the type and location of accessways and parking areas where off-site traffic would be affected.- The proposal does not include changes to the access points, driveway aisles, or location of parking where off-site traffic would be affected. Therefore,this criterion does not apply. Page 1 of 2 Phone: 503.639.4171 • Fax: 503.684.7297 • www.tigard-or.gov • TTY Relay: 503.684.2772 7. An increase in vehicular traffic to and from the site and the increase can be expected to exceed 100 vehicles per day. An increase in vehicular traffic is not expected from the 322-square foot increase in building space. 8. An increase in the floor areas proposed for a non-residential use by more than ten percent excluding expansions under 5,000 square feet. The increase of 322 square feet in floor area is less than 5,000 square feet. Therefore,this criterion does not apply. 9. A reduction in the area reserved for common open space and/or usable open space that reduces the open space area below the minimum required by the code or reduces the open space areas by more than ten percent. It is likely four shrubs will be removed to accommodate the increase in building size. Most of the increase will be on land already designated as paved. Therefore, the proposed modification does not remove more than 10% of the approved landscaping. 10. A reduction of project amenities (recreational facilities, screening; and/or, landscaping provisions) below the minimum established by the code or by more than ten percent where specified in the site plan. The proposal does not include changes to project amenities. Therefore, this criterion does not apply. 11. A modification to the conditions imposed at the time of Site Development Review approval that is not the subject of criteria (B). 1 through 10 above this subsection. The increase in building floor area does not violate any conditions of approval for SDR2004-00010. Therefore, this criterion does not apply. THIS REQUEST HAS BEEN APPROVED BY THE CURRENT PLANNING DIVISION, SUBJECT TO THE FOLLOWING CONDITIONS. PLEASE SUBMIT A COPY OF THIS LETTER WITH YOUR BUILDING PERMIT APPLICATION. CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL THE FOLLOWING CONDITIONS SHALL BE SATISFIED PRIOR TO ISSUANCE OF SITE AND/OR BUILDING PERMITS: The applicant shall address the requested materials to the CURRENT PLANNING DIVISION, ATTN: EMILY ENG,Tigard Cityl Iall, 13125 SW Hall Blvd,Tigard,OR 97223. 1. Sign the application form where it says "Owner's Signature." 2. The applicant shall revise the site plan to indicate the location of the four required parking spaces,which must include 1 disabled-accessible space. Per the land use approval SDR2004-00010, the disabled- accessible space shall be 5 feet from the main entrance of the building. This request is determined to be a minor modification to an approved site development plan. The Director's designee has determined that the proposed minor modification of this existing plan will continue to promote the general welfare of the City and will not be significantly detrimental, nor injurious to surrounding properties provided that, development which occurs after decision complies with all applicable local, state, and federal laws. If you need additional information or have any questions, please feel free to call me at (503) 718-2712 or stop by the Planning office at City Hall, 13125 SW Hall Blvd,Tigard,OR 97223. Sincerely, EmilyE Assistant lanner Copy.SDR2004-00010 Page 2 of 2 . 1 CITY of TIGARD `-W sTh GEOGRAPHIC INFORMATION SYSTEM �� MURDOi. VICINITY MAP J F :. • Illiilll llll/II! I �� MMD2007-0001.5 Ilik . soi o///111/lIIII DEZFULLI PAO, o AUTO SALES �� _ II �ttvI° 0000 �,• N,. o o° LAD' . •b. e co G- V‘ ��,�. % -+ SITE . 5`N♦ ,♦ s o WRY - SUBJEC1' . • . A, SITE '•#$V#* a ' ''‘\4 4\\\\*4 1- " it 4,:LE ST . . . r , , ,,..„, c., 1• killn. lit • s s ‘97- 111111001 g � � pad me 1 iii Li.NW r �p o B NAEVE S BEEF BEN°")i i i/!PA . ♦ ♦ �r ♦ '�� BEER o 00 o INN pp/ Tigard ,#, � E ° ��W. MIK Q8� p-: !.• 01111 .0 100 200 300 400 .500 Feet I 0 i* # • . # •izzi =1 #4 o g ✓ DR 1--Coiz �( • i [GARY.) ° # ** .. °o 01 y/,♦, Nfon atlon on this map is for general location only and O .♦� , should be verified wNh the Development Services Division. 13125 Tigard,,O Hall 223 ♦�� ♦♦ Tigard,OR 97223 BElSe- (503)039-4171• • !� httplA ww.ci.tlgard.or.us ' Community Development Plot date:May 7,2007;C:\magic\MAGIC03.APR 1 _ f 43 Po derosa. a. : a• C • • 1• •10 , rle'•Pir: : , . . 0. •••L•�i.� ''.35••• •• r 1. ,. % 's;".�`• '...) �.��ti• 3•,. I. . ./N TA.LL...I N I,. 7PY p►�sp:• • . • • `'` / A• -.t. o•Bros �'R1= 22 x65 :1 . ' •\f `'. .; ."' •'•: �,`�: ., /j IE OU]'• 221.90.: ( . . \ ro •i. Wj� 15 7�F`6 PVC' \ a '1 • ., . . . ...�_• • • 0�15.:� 0 166 19 •La • 'sole 1 . •• t I _•NN 10 LF 4 'PVC INSTALL .CO. t ....• ro : ' ;1 - ®.S — Q02. 'UD:•=•2279 •, --r' i ;Q o•• t`j 224.•7.6 ' `' - 3 . INSTALL G0. rD `... VN C ' \ 'r• UD 2272 . rt i' 'iNSFALL 4.Y/VC .,•TYPE..d a• :•" \- .. •84.. . 6�'�,':V,•• •®'S .=,..0.0/. •:4� %`. GR — '227..7 ' . .`' s1(C. ;S: .0.01••• -- ," `/E'OU.T. =221:90' o - :.,..„ ,.,.., *... ,'` ,�' 1.'5'7 U= 6"PVC ®• S co co ;•:•:•:'.:•'. •.*4;11 7.-,'::.1'-:• ••••• .. '';',• •:::: •.:: •IiH.—......ww.i,■ ••• •;:.•........."•;• • \r ri, Fij Ve:arer 4,, 4( *tabu •••-• - 1 i. .• • •'2: -.3 .41,00r,der,Vir ZIA '. ' .:'••:-::*,,..: "•.•;t.*:. . " '.. • ..1:t====..n.""-., =1=1% —:."AILZ::74 Ali ;47:::0111.1 .6 tou ........5.:, ,:z.:.: .,.... .... .„..... .. .. ...... .. • . co ...... . - .. . . .. . . , . . . .• . . .. , ... • .STOMA •..:OUTFALL: `. �',.:. �.: _. 225' . �. • - •'~ • .._ .- • .Conditionally Approved • , .......... .�- • . . -o For only the work 8adeszrilied•i><t. -'-- '. • ro•i PERMIT �'. Q� loos. /� . '/71 .---? 'See Letter to:. • . • i Attach... • - -[ �: . . • ! .-. . .. .. . •• . .. . • - b Y:--4aVt- , -;.....,...0.it 6:477410- l• • lob Address: -`--, _ .. /L � / 6/20/2007 CITY OF TIGARD 9:49:10AM I 13125 SW Hall Blvd.• TI G A R n Tigard,OR 97223 (503)639-4171 Conditions Associated With Case #: SDR2004-00010 Project Name: DEZFULLI USED AUTO SALES CURRENT STATUS UPDATED # DESCRIPTION : STATUS* DATE BY 1 DATE BY f 1 SIGN OFF LTR FRANCHISE HAULER M 5/25/2005 SJR 10/20/2005 ST 1. Provide a sign-off letter from the franchise hauler regarding the refuse facility compatibility. 2 PLAN WITH 24'WIDE ACCESS ISLES M 4/13/2006 SJR 4/13/2006 SJR 2. Submit a plan showing 24-foot-wide access isles in order to accommodate two-direction traffic. All drive isles must be maintained free of parked cars. 3 BICYCLE PKNG STRUCTURE M 4/13/2006 SJR 4/13/2006 SJR 3. Submit a plan showing the bicycle parking structure to include no less than 2-bicycle parking stalls. 4 BICYCLE RACK DESIGN M 4/13/2006 SIR 4/13/2006 SJR 4. Provide a plan that shows the bicycle rack designed according to Section 18.765.050.C.of the Tigard Development Code. 5 NEW TREE REMOV/PROT/MIT PLAN M 5/25/2005 MAS 1/17/2006 SIR 5. Provide a new tree removal/protection/mitigation plan that correlates with the project arborists report. The required plan must be accompanied with a letter from the project arborist that acknowledges his or her review and approval. Any variation from the resubmitted plan will require an additional Type II review. 6 FINAL TREE PROT PLAN M 5/1/2006 SJR 5/1/2006 PLN 6. The applicant shall submit a final Tree Protection Plan that shows exactly how far the tree protection fencing will be from the face of each protected tree(including those on neighboring properties where construction occurs within the trees' driplines)that will be impacted by construction activities within its dripline. The applicant,through their Project Arborist, shall justify the close proximity of the construction activities to the trees. He shall certify that the activities will not adversely impact the overall and long-term health and stability of each tree. Any construction that occurs within the neighboring trees' driplines should be justified by the applicant and approved by the City Forester and neighboring property owner(s). Work may proceed within the driplines only with the approval of the City Forester. 7 PKNG LOT LITE/ELEV OF SALES OFFIC M 6/20/2007 MAS 6/20/2007 CAC 7. Submit a plan showing parking lot lighting and an elevation of the proposed sales office that shows windows and point of access. NOTE: Plan will be submitted about the same time as building permit application SJR 8 PFI PERMIT M 10/20/2005 KSM 10/20/2005 ST 8. Prior to issuance of a site permit,a Public Facility Improvement(PFI)permit is required for this project to cover half-street and any other work in the public right-of-way. Six(6)sets of detailed public improvement plans shall be submitted for review to the Engineering Department. NOTE:these plans are in addition to any drawings required by the Building Division and should only include sheets relevant to public improvements. Public Facility Improvement(PFI)permit plans shall conform to City of Tigard Public Improvement Design Standards,which are available at City Hall and the City's web page(www.ci.tigard.or.us). 9 EXACT LGL NAME/ADD/PHONE M 10/20/2005 KSM 10/20/2005 ST 9. The PFI permit plan submittal shall include the exact legal name,address and telephone number of the individual or corporate entity who will be designated as the"Permittee",and who will provide the financial assurance for the public improvements. For example,specify if the entity is a corporation,limited partnership,LLC,etc. Also specify the state within which the entity is incorporated and provide the name of the corporate contact person. Failure to provide accurate information to the Engineering Department will delay processing of project documents. I0 CONST VEH ACCESS/PKNG PLAN M 10/20/2005 KSM 10/20/2005 ST 10. The applicant shall provide a construction vehicle access and parking plan for approval by the City Engineer. The purpose of this plan is for parking and traffic control during the public improvement construction phase. All construction vehicle parking shall be provided on-site. No construction vehicles or equipment will be permitted to park on the adjoining residential or commercial public streets. Construction vehicles include the vehicles of any contractor or subcontractor involved in the construction of site improvements or buildings proposed by this application,and shall include the vehicles of all suppliers and employees associated with the project. 11 1/2 STREET IMPROVEMENT M 10/20/2005 KSM 10/20/2005 ST PIng-CaseConditions.rpt Page 1 of 3 12' x 5 • Mobile Office Bt .dings !Th_i___,I.,_=:_________________. Delivered ready to use "On-Time and On Budget" /'..- I I I j I •0411441 11 I I II. , II RECEIVED t I rii iI 1 1 I l I II f I 2007 i� I ��, III II I IIII II , JUN 19 �� I . II1 III III 1 I I ( 10 I , I I I I I III I 1 1 1 I CITY OF i iGARD II I I' I IIql-TI��I I I 1 ---1 i I I I I i I Q) ��.t 1ll�.l('..�.�.-..��rr•��Ilir L� I Ii I I IIIIIIII , I II1 I I I� I I I Lli l � III II IIi U ' l 11 I II 1 � r--� lill - 1 1 ' 8" i I 23 ' 2" A 1 2' 5" Optional - Restroomj ii 'w■■■ 41.111 .1.74 - . ------ - 12 x 56 mobile office building • 672 square feet of office building; includes two private offices and one extra large middle office area. • All offices are 11 feet wide, no need to conserve on the size of your office furniture. • Provides ample office space for four to ten people. • Optional handicapped accessible restroom • As a further convenience an oversized heating and air conditioning system is included providing a comfortable work environment. • This building is constructed with a steel I-beam outrigger chassis, engineered to create a safe and solid office building. • Vinyl floors offer an almost maintenance free office building. • Upgraded interior wall coverings and decorative wood siding, provides for a professional appearance. DESIGN MODULAR Q� BUILDINGS www.dsmbi.com From Vision to Reality On Time And On Budget Telephone Toll Free: 866-889-7777 1 4 ` - -__________,, rn a /CI ifiefiw / `'- g tl w qi pi cr I _ —7-7-4-,_ __ i _ ,Q / ,c., 0 / 1,1, p 0 , . „,ti. ,e4,,, s, ,; 2V If l 5.... • u!A;F::; /1i/o,: l'f1jF,t,TS ••••,.... 1 cp,,,, N • .... 5' .1. ., \ \ :ii ''' c) / / /1 in \ --", 2 6 4,:if \ r-- l',1 .c.56/ 7/ / t o \ r s/ J � / V , \ 4 O / O o 6 o /L I t/P) 12-1.00 0q , G, I v *- // _57 I all , \■.. .. / / ly co *. iii / /// co ti y 006 / / ` / N / a: 2 / ;: = s\ N Ei / 004.0/' pox$ p \\ / . i / / o \ \ SHEET PROJECT: DESiONED: 4/8 HIGHWAY 99 AUTO RESALE CHAS: CHECKED: OWNER: PROJECT SANITARY SEWER & WATER PLAN ABE DEZFULLI 12587 S . 133rd AVE. TIGARD, OREGON 97223 (503) 524-5433 . DAVID D. HUNTER )NSULTING ARBORIST Forestry Works Tree Service PO Box 324 Forest Grove, OR 97116-0324 CCB# 119845 Metro License# 5883 Phone: (503) 357-4344 Cell: (503) 319-0380 June 26, 2007 Fax: (503) 992-0169 ddhunterarborist@aol.com Mr. Abe Dezfulli 12587 SW 133rd Ave. Tigard, OR 97223 Fax: 503-524-5433 Cell: 503-267-3282 RE: May Auto Group Company Project 15280 SW Pacific Hwy. Tigard, OR. — Final Report. Dear Mr. Abe Dezfulli, The tree protection plan was implemented from plans drawn up from a prior arborist. I came onto the project as the consulting arborist in April 2007. In April the tree protection fencing was up and I had discussions with the City and construction manager about the trees and best protections. There was a delay of working on the project till end of May due to the rain. This was good since it reduced areas of compaction. There was minimal root damage to the sweet gum tree when the utility box trench was dug. Roots were smaller than 1"and were correctly pruned.No other trees had root damage from the construction activity. The health of the sweet gum tree is fair due to location and structural issues. The tree is located near the retention pond and has materials placed underneath the other half of the root system from the neighbors' business operation. The tree was only pruned of limbs that conflicted with utility box placement. The health of the cedar tree is fair due to location near overhead utility wires. The tree was pruned for sidewalk clearance and to repair broken limbs from storm damage. The health of the sequoia tree is good. The tree was pruned for parking lot clearance. This tree is a property line tree. The one problem with the plan was the pine trees that were to be saved along Pacific Ave., were removed because of demands for a wider sidewalk. Since the sidewalk had to be wider,the grade change made it impractical to save the trees. This was the only failure of the plan. 1 N • • " DAVID D. HUNTER INSULTING ARBORIST Forestry Works Tree Sep rice PO Box 324 Forest Grove, OR 97116-0324 CCB# 119845 Metro License# 5883 The tree protection fencing was in place and in good condition when I left the site on June 15. The remaining trees will be a benefit to the site. Questions? Please give a call to my cell phone. Sincerely, David D. Hunter (electronic signature) David D. Hunter ASCA Registered Consulting Arborist#408 ISA Certified Arborist#PN-1068A PNW ISA Certified Tree Risk Assessor # 0150 Professional Forester CC: cherylc @tigard-or.gov 2 DAVID D. HUNTER, INSULTING ARBORIST Forestry Works Tree Service PO Box 324 Forest Grove, OR 97116-0324 CCB# 119845 Metro License# 5883 Phone: (503) 357-4344 Cell: (503) 319-0380 June 17, 2007 Fax: (503)992-0169 ddhunterarborist@aol.com Mr. Abe Dezfulli 12587 SW 133`d Ave. Tigard, OR 97223 Fax: 503-524-5433 Cell: 503-267-3282 RE: May Auto Group Company Project 15280 SW Pacific Hwy. Tigard,OR. Dear Mr. Abe Dezfulli, Trees 602 and 603 the pine trees along the highway, have been removed for the sidewalk placement. The trees were removed on June 15, 2007. The sweet gum tree was pruned of the limb above the utility box. The cedar tree was pruned for sidewalk clearance and to remove limbs to match visually. The sequoia tree was pruned for vehicle clearance. The tree protection fencing was in place and in good condition when I left the site on June 15. Questions? Please give a call to my cell phone. Sincerely, David D. Hunter (electronic signature) David D. Hunter ASCA Registered Consulting Arborist#408 ISA Certified Arborist#PN-1068A PNW ISA Certified Tree Risk Assessor # 0150 Professional Forester DAVID D. HUNTER, NSULTING ARBORIST Forestry Works Tree Service PO Box 324 Forest Grove, OR 97116-0324 CCB # 119845 Metro License # 5883 Phone: (503) 357-4344 Cell: (503) 319-0380 June 5, 2007 Fax: (503) 992-0169 ddhunterarborist @aol.com Mr. Abe Dezfulli 12587 SW 133rd Ave. Tigard, OR 97223 Fax: 503-524-5433 Cell: 503-267-3282 RE: May Auto Group Company Project 15280 SW Pacific Hwy. Tigard, OR. Dear Mr. Abe Dezfulli, I discussed the sidewalk issues relating to the trees with Bob Montgomery, your construction manager, and we discussed the trees that are along Pacific Ave. Trees 602 and 603 are pine trees along the highway. The sidewalk has been laid out with forming, and we discussed grading and soil issues around the trees with a 5' wide sidewalk. We discussed how the grading would best serve the trees, and have minimal impact on the root zones. The trees are in poor condition, and the grading that needs to be done is were the old ditch and driveway access were. The grading is to be gradual for pedestrian safety near the sidewalk as it slopes towards the pine trees. Bob Montgomery mentioned that the sidewalk could be required to be widened to 6'. This would have a detrimental impact on the trees since the grading would need to be changed toward the pine trees and the final grading would end by the base of the trees. If the goal is to save the pine trees, then I recommend that the sidewalk be kept at 5' wide. Questions? Please give a call to my cell phone. Sincerely, David D. Hunter (electronic signature) David D. Hunter ASCA Registered Consulting Arborist# 408 ISA Certified Arborist #PN-1068A PNW ISA Certified Tree Risk Assessor # 0150 Professional Forester ■ DAVID D.HUNTER, NSULTING ARBORIST Forestry Works Tree Service PO Box 324 Forest Grove, OR 97116-0324 CCB # 119845 Metro License# 5883 Phone: (503) 357-4344 Cell: (503) 319-0380 May 30, 2007 t/ Fax: (503) 992-0169 ddhunterarborist@aol.com Mr. Abe Dezfulli 12587 SW 133`d Ave. Tigard, OR 97223 Fax: 503-524-5433 Cell: 503-267-3282 RE: May Auto Group Company Project 15280 SW Pacific Hwy. Tigard, OR. Dear Mr. Abe Dezfulli, I met today on site with Bob Montgomery, your construction manager, and we discussed the trees that are to be protected, and how to work the site in a way that will have minimal impact on the trees. Tree 601, sweet gum tree has had the construction activity for the retention pond completed, and minimal impact to the tree was observed. The work for the utility access had minimal impact on the tree. The tree protection fencing was in place after the work was finished for the utility access. Trees 602 and 603 are pine trees along the highway. The sidewalk has been put in place, and we discussed grading and soil issues around the trees. The trees are in poor condition, and the grading that needs to be done is were the old ditch and driveway access were. The tree protection fencing was in place. Bob Montgomery and I discussed landscaping and pruning needs. The pruning of the trees to allow for sidewalk and street clearance,plus prune out dead limbs will be done in a couple of weeks after the concrete for the sidewalk is complete. A certified arborist will do any tree pruning of the site trees. Questions? Please give a call to my cell phone. Sincerely. David D. Hunter (electronic signature) David D. Hunter ASCA Registered Consulting Arborist#408 ISA Certified Arborist#PN-1068A PNW ISA Certified Tree Risk Assessor # 0150 Professional Forester 'DAVID D. HUNTER, `NSULTING ARBORIST Forestry Works Tree Sei vice PO Box 324 Forest Grove, OR 97116-0324 CCB # 119845 Metro License# 5883 Phone: (503) 357-4344 Cell: (503) 319-0380 April 11, 2007 z1 Fax: (503) 992-0169 ddhunterarborist@aol.com Mr. Abe Dezfulli 12587 SW 1331-d Ave. Tigard, OR 97223 Fax: 503-524-5433 Cell: 503-267-3282 RE: May Auto Group Company Project 15280 SW Pacific Hwy. Tigard, OR. Dear Mr. Abe Dezfulli, Thank you for your showing me your project yesterday, and asking me to be the arborist for this project,to help with the tree protection concerns. We looked at the trees remaining on site, and discussed the tree protection concerns with Michael White, Engineering Department from the City of Tigard. Tree 601 is a sweet gum tree and the construction activity of the retention pond calls for adding soil up to 12"more under part of the drip line and inside the tree protection fencing. I do not see conflict for the tree with this soil addition as long as the soil is added with minimal compaction. Trees 602 and 603 are pine trees along the highway. We discussed with the engineer that in order to best save the trees, the sidewalk should be placed along the street curb, and that grading or fill toward the pines should have minimal compaction. The tree protection fencing around the site trees appears to be adequate. A certified arborist should do any tree pruning of the deodar cedar or the sequoia to lift up the canopy. We discussed that follow up tree protection reports are required every two weeks as per the City of Tigard. I look forward to working with you and your construction manager on this project. Questions? Please give a call to my cell phone. Sincerely. David D. Hunter ASCA Registered Consulting Arborist#408 ISA Certified Arborist#PN-1068A PNW ISA Certified Tree Risk Assessor#0150 Professional Forester From: <DDHunterArborist @aol.corn> To: <maris @tigard.or.gov> Date: 5/17/2007 5:23:01 AM Subject: May Auto Group Project 15280 SW Pacific Hwy. Tigard, OR Maris, I am the arborist Abe Dezfulli hired for his project. I did write an arborist report for him on April 11, 2007 about the trees and tree protection fencing. At that time the tree fencing looked adequate. Tree 601 I saw no problem adding the soil to finish the retention pond. I discussed with Michael White of Engineering City of Tigard, the pine trees along the highway. We discussed that the sidewalk would be better along the curb. The project since then has not done any further construction activity. I apologize that I am late to get a letter and response to you. My computer with the report is down, and I had to make an old computer at home work. I can get a copy of the report to you if you need one. Thank you. David D. Hunter PO Box 324 Forest Grove, OR 97116 Office: 503-357-4344 Cell: 503-319-0380 Fax: 503-992-0169 ASCA RCA#408 ISA Certified Arborist# PN-1068 A PNW ISA Certified Tree Risk Assessor# 0150 Professional Forester ************************************** See what's free at http://www.aol.com. • HALSTEA` S ARBORICULTURE "Specialists in the care and on of trees" • CONSULTANTS, INC. David Halstead,Consultant,B.S. Phillip Whitcomb,Consultant P.O.Box 1182•Tualatin,OR 97062 4 (503)245-1383 41. -• . r September 1, 2006 • if City of Tigard, Oregon 1 • ATTN.: Mr. Matt Stine, City Arborist • 13125 SW Hall Blvd. 4 - Tigard, OR 97223 Reference: Inspection and TPZ Report Location: Naeve Street and Highway 99W •� Subject: Bi-Weekly Inspections The "Tree Protection Zone" (TPZ) is in place and adjustments were completed as required for the project. Sincerely, A David Halstead BS CA#0146A its Mr. Abe Dezfull 12587 SW 133rd Avenue Tigard, OR 97223 I� I Email: hac@spiritone.com www.halsteadsarboriculture.com ccB#0068646 HALSTEI )'S ARBORICULTURE "Specialists preservation of t e sand CONSULTANTS, INC. ' David Halstead,Consultant,B.S. Phillip Whitcomb,Consultant • • P.O.Box 1182•Tualatin,OR 97062 at (503)245-1383 ► I r June 19, 2006 s IV . t i City of Tigard, Oregon ATTN.: Mr. Matt Stine, City Arborist . lL _ 13125 SW Hall Blvd. `4 Tigard, OR 97223 Reference: Inspection and TPZ Report •04 A' Location: Naeve Street and Highway 99W Subject: Bi-Weekly Inspections The "Tree Protection Zone" (TPZ) is in place and adjustments were completed as required for the project. Sincerely, i David alstead BS CA#059 IV Mr. Abe Dezfull 12587 SW 133rd Avenue Tigard, OR 97223 1 Email: hac @spiritone.com www.halsteadsarboriculture.com CcB#0068646 HALSTEA_ S ARBORICULTURE "Specialists in the care and preservation of trees" CONSULTANTS, INC. David Halstead,Consultant,B.S. • Phillip Whitcomb,Consultant vt • P.O.Box 1182•Tualatin,OR 97062 4 (503)245-1383 1"r July 15, 2006 C O CD ' City of Tigard, Oregon • ATTN.: Mr. Matt Stine, City Arborist 13125 SW Hall Blvd. ' - Tigard, OR 97223 Reference: Inspection and TPZ Report w . ' Location: Naeve Street and Highway 99W 4.r•- Subject: Bi-Weekly Inspections The "Tree Protection Zone" (TPZ) is in place and adjustments were completed as required for the project. t d `I ,;'3t Sincerely, • ` David Halstead BS CA#0146A 1 t,L, {� Mr. Abe Dezfull 12587 SW 133rd Avenue Tigard, OR 97223 ('I � II� Email: hac@spiritone.com www.halsteadsarboriculture.com CCB#0068646 III CITY OF TIGARD 8/21/2007 • l: 13125 SW HaII Blvd. 1 1:21:01 AM Tigard,OR 97223 503.639.4171 TIGARD Receipt #: 27200700000000003838 Date: 08/21/2007 Line Items: Case No Tran Code Description Revenue Account No Amount Paid SDR2004-00010 [UNGRND] In Lieu Underground 230-0000-445003 14,385.00 Line Item Total: $14,385.00 Payments: Method Payer User ID Acct./Check No. Approval No. How Received Amount Paid Check EBRAHIM K DEZFULLI ST 1006 In Person 14,385.00 Payment Total: $14,385.00 cReceipt.rpt Page 1 of 1