Loading...
SDR2006-00005 SDR2006 - 00005 TIGARD SKATE PARK NOTICE OF TYPE II DECISION SITE DEVELOPMENT REVIEW(SDR) 2006-00005 i TIGARD SKATE PARK T 1 GAyi kt 120 DAYS = 5/18/2007 SECTION I. APPLICATION SUMMARY FILE NAME: TIGARD SKATE PARK CASE NOS.: Site Development Review(SDR) SDR2006-00005 PROPOSAL: The applicant is requesting approval to construct a 15,000 square-foot skate park on the City Hall site. The site consists of three parcels that total 9.84 acres. APPLICANT/ City of Tigard APPLICANT'S Winterbrook Planning OWNER: Parks Department REP.: Attn: Ben Schonberger Attn:Dan Plaza 310 SW 4t'Ave.,Suite 1100 13125 SW Hall Blvd. Portland,OR 97204 Tigard,OR 97223 LOCATION: 13125 SW Hall Boulevard,Washington County Tax Map 2S 102DA,Tax Lot 400 and 401; and 8720 SW Burnham Street; Washington County Tax Map 2S102DA, Tax Lot 200. ZONE: CBD: Central Business District. The CBD zoning district is designed to provide a concentrated central business district, centered on the City's historic downtown, including a mix of civic, retail and office uses. Single-family attached housing, at a maximum density of 12 units/net acre, equivalent of the R-12 zoning district, and multi-family housing at a minimum density of 32 units/acre, equivalent to the R-40 zoning district,are permitted outright.A wide range of uses,including but not limited to adult entertainment, utilities, facilities with drive-up windows, medical centers, major event entertainment and gasoline stations,are permitted conditionally. APPLICABLE REVIEW CRITERIA: Community Development Code Chapters 18.360, 18.390, 18.520, 18.705, 18.725, 18.745, 18.755, 18.765, 18.780, 18.790, 18.795 and 18.810. SECTION II. DECISION Notice is hereby given that the City of Tigard Community Development Director's designee has APPROVED the above request subject to certain conditions of approval. The findings and conclusions on which the decision is based are noted in Section VI. NOTICE OF TYPE II DEQSION SDR2006-00005/TIGARD SKATE PARK PAGE 1 OF 27 ' � h CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL THE FOLLOWING CONDITIONS SHALL BE SATISFIED PRIOR TO THE ISSUANCE OF SITE PERMITS: Submit to the Planning Division(Cheryl Caines,639-4171,ext. 2437) for review and approval: 1. Prior to site work the applicant shall submit a revised site plan for review and approval showing the walkway from the City Hall North parking lot to the sidewalk adjacent to Police headquarters marked with striping or contrasting pavement materials. 2. Prior to site work the applicant shall submit for review and approval a landscape plan showing the types,size and number of-plantings to be installed. 3. If street trees are removed to meet site distance requirements, then street trees shall be replaced to meet the current standards, outside of the site distance line. A site plan showing the size and species of the proposed street trees shall be submitted for review and approval prior to planting. 4. Prior to site/building permit issuance the applicant shall provide a plan for review and approval that shows the minimum parking requirements are being met by providing an additional 17 parlung spaces. These spaces shall not be further than 500 feet from the pnmary site (1"I�C 18.765.030.B). 5. The applicant shall provide for review and approval a detail of the bike racks to be used. 6. Tree Protection - Prior to any site work the applicant shall install all proposed tree protection fencing. The fencing shall be inspected and approved by the Project Arborist and City Planner (Cher/Caines) pnor to commencing any site work. The tree protection fencing shall remain in place through the duration of all of the building construction phases, until the Certificate of Occupancy has been approved. 7. Prior to issuance of building permits, the applicant shall submit site plan drawings indicating the location of the trees that were preserved on the lot during site development, location of tree protection fencing,and a signature of approval from the project arborist regarding the placement and construction techniques to be employed in building the structures. All proposed protection fencing shall be installed and inspected pnor to commencing construction. The fencing shall remain in place through the duration of- ll of the building construction phases, until the Certificate of Occupancy has been approved. After approval from the City Forester, the tree protection measures may be removed. 8. The applicant shall have an on-going responsibility to ensure that the Project Arborist has submitted written reports to the Planning Department (Cheryl Caines), at least once every two weeks, as the Project Arborist monitors the construction activities from initial tree protection zone (TPZ) fencing installation through the building construction phases. The reports shall evaluate the condition and location of the tree protection fencing,determine if any changes occurred to the TPZ,and if any part of the Tree Protection Plan has been violated. If the amount of TPZ was reduced, then the Project Arborist shall justify why the fencing was moved and shall certify that the construction activities did not adversely impact the overall, long-term health and stability of the tree(s). If the reports are not submitted to the City at the scheduled intervals, and if it appears the TPZ's or the Tree Protection Plan are not being followed by the contractor or a sub-contractor, the City can stop work on the project until an inspection can be done by City Staff and the Project Arbonst. Prior to issuance of any Certificates of Occupancy, the Project Arbonst will submit a final certification indicating the elements of the Tree Protection Plan were followed and that all remaining trees on the site are healthy,stable,and viable in their modified growing environment. 9. When Hall Boulevard is widened,the current visual clearance requirements shall be met unless a Site Distance Certification is provided that shows the site distance requirements can be met. NOTICE OF TYPE II DECISION SDR2006-00005/TIGARD SKATE PARK PAGE 2 OF 27 1 , ' Submit to the Engineering Department (Kim McMillan, 639-4171, ext 2642) for review and approval: 10. A Public Facility Improvement (PFI) permit is required for this project to cover driveway improvements on Burnham Street and any other work in the public right-of-way. Three (3) sets of detailed public improvement plans shall be submitted for review to the Engineering Department. NOTE:these plans are in addition to any drawings required by the Building Division and should only include sheets relevant to public improvements. Public Facility Improvement (PH)permit plans shall conform to City of TigardPublic Improvement Design Standards,which are available at City Hall and the City's web page (www.tigard-or.gov). 11. The PFI permit plan submittal shall include the exact legal name, address and telephone number of the individual or corporate entity who will be designated as the "Permittee", and who will provide the financial assurance for the public improvements. For example, specify if the entity is a corporation, limited partnership, LLC, etc. Also specify the state within which the entity is incorporated and provide the name of the corporate contact person.. Failure to provide accurate information to the Engineering Department will delay processing of project documents. 12. Prior to issuance of permits, the applicant's engineer shall submit additional information regarding sight distance from the main City Hail driveway on Hall Boulevard and show how much sight distance will be improved with the trimming or removal of vegetation and street trees on the inside of the horizontal curve of Hall Boulevard. If the trimming and removal of vegetation improve intersection sight distance the applicant will be required to do so prior to final inspection. 13. Prior to issuance of permits, the applicant shall submit a traffic circulation and signage plan that encourages skate park traffic to use the Burnham Street access. 14. Prior to issuance of permits, the applicant shall explore any option for a shared access on Burnham Street with the adjacent parcel or place the driveway as far from the intersection as possible. 15. Prior to issuance of permits,the applicant shall apply for and receive approval of an adjustment to the spacing standard for the two driveways in accordance with the spacing standard of 18.705.030.H3 and the vanance and adjustment stan of 18.370. 16. The applicant shall provide a construction vehicle access and parking plan for approval by the City Engineer. The purpose of this plan is for parking and traffic control during the public improvement construction.phase. The parking and access aisles outside the footprint of the skate park cannot be used for staging or parking by the contractors throughout this project. 17. Prior to issuance of permits, additional right-of-way shall be conveyed to the State of Oregon, by and through its Deppartment of Transportation,Highway Division,along the frontage of Hall Boulevard to increase the rght-of-way to 52 feet from centerline. The description shall be tied to the existing right- of-way centerline. Verification that the conveyance has been submitted to the State shall be provided to the City Engineering Department. (For additional information, contact Martin Abero, Oregon Department of Transportation, Right-of-Way Section, 123 NW Flanders,Portland, OR 97209-437; Phone: 731-8425). 18. Prior to issuance of permits,additional right-of-wayshall be dedicated to the Public along the frontage of Burnham Street to increase the right-of-way to 37.5 feet from the centerline. The description shall be tied to the existing ay right-of-w centerline. The dedication document shall be on City forms. Instructions are available from the Engineering Department. 19. Prior to issuance of permits,the applicant shall obtain an ODOT Miscellaneous Permit from the State of Oregon Highway Division,to perform work within the right-of-way of Hall Boulevard. A copy of the permit shall be provided to the City Engineering Department. 20. Final design plans and calculations for the proposed private water quality facility shall be submitted to the Engineering Department (Kim McMillan) and ODOT for review and approval. Final approval will be part of the ODOT Drainage Permit, which must be issued prior to issuance of any City permits. NOTICE OF TYPE II DECISION SDR2006-00005/TIGARD SKATE PARK PAGE 3 OF 27 • �` r 21. The applicant is required to contact ODOT to determine if a drainage study is required for connection to the facility in Hall Boulevard. 22. ODOT drainage Permit is required for connection to state highway drainage facilities. 23. An erosion control plan shall be provided as part of the Site Permit drawings. The plan shall conform to the "Erosion Prevention and Sediment Control Design and Planning Manual, February 2003 edition." THE FOLLOWING CONDITIONS SHALL BE SATISFIED PRIOR TO FINAL BUILDING INSPECTION: Submit to the Planning Division(Cheryl Caines, 639-4171, ext. 2437) for review and approval: 24. The applicant/owner shall amend the Tigard Municipal code (7.52.100) to prohibit the possession, control or consumption of alcoholic beverages in Tigard Skate Park 25. A separate sign permit will be required for all tenant signage prior to installation. 26. The applicant/owner shall record a deed restriction to the effect that any existing tree greater than 12" diameter may be removed only if the tree dies or is hazardous according to a certified arborist. The deed restriction may be removed or will be considered invalid if a tree preserved in accordance with this decision should either die or be removed as a hazardous tree. Submit to the Engineering Department (Kim McMillan, 639-4171, ext. 2642) for review and approval: 27. Prior to a final inspection, the applicant shall complete any work in the public right-of-way and obtain approval from ODOT and the City of TigarddLngineenng Department. 28. If the applicant proposes to provide lighting or other electrical services to the skate ark they shall pay the-tee i -lieu of under grounding. The fee shall be calculated by the frontage of-the site that is parallel to the utility lines and will be$35.00 per lineal foot. 29. Prior to a final inspection,the applicant shall demonstrate that they have entered into a maintenance agreement with Stormwater Management,or another company that demonstrates they can meet the maintenance requirements of the manufacturer, for the proposed onsite storm water treatment facility. 30. Prior to final inspection, the applicant's engineer shall submit final sight distance certification for both driveways. THIS APPROVAL SHALL BE VALID FOR EIGHTEEN(18) MONTHS FROM THE EFFECTIVE DATE OF THIS DECISION. SECTION III. BACKGROUND INFORMATION Site History: Staff conducted a search of City records for the subject property. Land use applications related to on-site work include construction,expansion and remodel the existing buildings. These include a Conditional Use Permit to allow a Department of Motor Vehicles office within an industrial zone CU 18-76), construction of an office/warehouse building to be used by an electrical contractor (SDR24-7 , and redevelopment of the site for the City Hall complex (SDR91-0017). No other land use cases were ound to be on file with the City besides some temporary sign permits. NOTICE OF TYPE II DECISION SDR2006-00005/TIGARD SKATE PARK PAGE 4 OF 27 r • . Vicinity Information: The subject site is located at the intersection of Hall Boulevard and Burnham Street. The property is zoned CBD with properties to the north and east also zoned CBD. Properties to the east across Hall Blvd. are zoned Light Industrial. To the south of the City Hall complex across Fanno Creek is residential zoning (R- 12). Surrounding properties are developed with a mix of commercial, industrial, municipal and residential uses. Site Information and Proposal Description: The applicant is requesting Site Development Review to construct a 15,000 square foot skate park facility on the City Hall complex. There are five existing buildings on the site (City Hall &Police, Permit Center the Niche and two modular offices). The new skate park will effect existing parking and landscape areas oI the site. Few other changes are proposed to the existing conditions. SECTION IV. COMMENTS FROM PROPERTY OWNERS WITHIN 500 FEET E-mail correspondence was received during the comment period for the Skate Park(SDR2006-00005) from Joanne Zimmer and Ted Hedlund, neighboring residents. Their concerns included alcohol use in Tigard parks, increased number of strangers within the adjacent neighborhoods, increased crime, noise, and traffic congestion. They indicated they believe these things lead to depressed home values. The City has adopted an Ordinance prohibiting drinking in Fanno Creek Park, Liberty Park, Main Street Park and Commercial Park The applicant shall request an amendment to the Tigard Municipal Code (7.52.100) to also include the Skate Park facility (Condition #24). Rules will be posted at the Skate Park These include no alcohol, drugs or boom boxes/radios and no trespassing on private property. The park is located within the City Hall parking lot and is only open during daylight hours. The park is not supervised like most park facilities. Crimes icallyoccur in secluded areas. This sites proximity to the City Hail/Police and a busy arterial(Hall Boulevard) make it highly visible to citizens and staff in the area. Many people associate skateboarding with gangs and crime,but the typical skate park user will only be at the park to skate. The skating community is typically self-monitoring. The skaters take turns and look out for one another so no injuries happen. Planning Staff has done some Internet research on the impacts of skate parks on surrounding communities. There are incidents of crime within skate parks,just like in all types of parks, but many articles/studies speak to the positive social impacts of skate parks by bringing people together with a common cause. At this time there is no conclusive evidence that skate parks have negative impacts on surrounding communities. SECTION V. SUMMARY OF APPLICABLE REVIEW CRITERIA The proposal's consistency with these Code Chapters is reviewed in the following sections: A. Zoning Districts 18.520 Commercial Zoning Districts B. Applicable Development Code Standards 18.705 Access Egress and Circulation 18.725 Environmental Performance Standards 18.745 Landscaping and Screening 18.755 Mixed SolidWaste and Recyclable Storage 18.765 Off-Street parking and loading requirements 18.780 Signs 18.790 Tree Removal 18.795 Visual Clearance C. Specific SDR Approval Criteria 18.360 D. Street and Utility Improvement Standards 18.810 E. Decision Making Procedures 18.390 Impact Study NOTICE OF TYPE II DECISION SDR2006-00005/TIGARD SKATE PARK PAGE 5 OF 27 1 SECTION VI. APPLICABLE DEVELOPMENT CODE STANDARDS A. ZONING DISTRICTS Commercial Zoning District Section 18.520.020 Lists the description of the Commercial Zoning Districts. The site is located in the CBD: Central Business District. The proposed use, community recreation is outright permitted in the zone. The present use of the site is a mix of Emergency_Services (Police) and Office (City Hall). The City Hall building houses the public meeting room, Town Hall. This room is used for court, City Council and Planning Commission meetings, and public hearings and is available for rent by the public. Assembly room facilities are not classified as a separate use in the code, but the use is similar to religious facilities. Development Standards: Section 18.520.040.B States that development standards in commercial zoning districts are contained in Table 18.520.2 below: TABLE 18.520.2 DEVELOPMENT STANDARDS IN COMMERCIAL ZONES STANDARD GG Proposed Minimum Lot Size None N/A Minimum Lot Width None N/A Minimum Setbacks -Front yard 0/30 ft[t] 160 ft -Side facing street on corner&through lots 0/30 ft In 1 ft -Side yard 0/30 ft 11] 390 ft -Rear yard 0/30 ft In 285 ft - Distance between front of garage &property line abutting - N/A a public or private street Maximum Height 80 ft[2] 8 ft Maximum Site Coverage 85% 52% Minimum Landscape Requirement 15% 48% [1]No setback shall be requited except 30 feet shall be required where the zone abuts a residential zoning district. [2]Maximum height of any building within 100 feet of any residential zoning district shall not exceed 40 feet. As demonstrated in the table above,the proposal complies with the underlying zone development standards. These standards were generally addressed by the applicant, but actual figures were calculated by Planning Staff. Measurements for setbacks were taken from the proposed site p ai n. Landscape and site coverage percentages were estimated by reviewing qty aerial photographs. Because part of the site is comprised of Fanno Creek Park,the landscaping sandard is greatly exceeded. The proposed changes include the removal and addition of landscaping areas. The site abuts a residential zone to the south,but the proposed skate park complies with the 30 foot required setback because the setback is approximately 285 feet. FINDING: Based on the analysis above,the underlying zoning district standards have been fully met. B. APPLICABLE DEVELOPMENT CODE STANDARDS The Site development Review approval standards require that a development proposal be found to be consistent with the various standards of the Community Development Code. The applicable criteria in this case are Chapters 18.360, 18.370, 18.390, 18.530, 18.705, 18.745, 18.755, 18.765, 18.775 18.780, 18.790, 18.795, and 18.810. The proposal's consistency with these Code Chapters is reviewed in the following sections. NOTICE OF TYPE II DECISION SDR2006-00005/TIGARD SKATE PARK PAGE 6 OF 27 Access,Egress and Circulation(18.705): Access plan: No building or other permit shall be issued until scaled plans are presented and approved as provided by this chapter that show how access, egress and circulation requirements are to be fulfilled. The applicant shall submit a site plan. The Director shall provide the applicant with detailed information about this submission requirement. The applicant has_provided plans showing access from Hall Boulevard and Burnham Street. The driveway from Burnham will be utilized as the main access point. Joint access: Owners of two or more uses, structures, or parcels of land may agree to utilize jointly the same access and egress when the combined access and egress of both uses, structures, or parcels of land satisfies the combined requirements as designated in this title,provided: Satisfactory-legal evidence shall be presented in the form of deeds,easements,leases or contracts to establish the joint use; and copies of the deeds,easements, leases or contracts are placed on permanent file with the City. The prop?sed facility shares access with the other existing uses of the City Hall complex. Because all the uses are City facilities,no shared access agreement is required. Public street access: All vehicular access and egress as required in Sections 18.705.030H and 18.705.030I shall connect directly with a public or private street approved by the City for public use and shall be maintained at the required standards on a continuous basis. The proposed building will be accessible from Burnham Street and Hall Boulevard,which will be maintained as public streets. Therefore,this criterion has been satisfied. Curb cuts: Curb cuts shall be in accordance with Section 18.810.030N: Concrete curbs, curb cuts, wheelchair, bicycle ramps and driveway approaches shall be constructed in accordance with standards specified in this chapter and Section 15.04.080: Concrete curbs and driveway approaches are required,except where no sidewalk is planned,an asphalt approach may be constructed with City Engineer approval and Asphalt and concrete driveway approaches to the property line shall be built to City configuration standards. Because the park will utilize existing access drives,no curb cuts are proposed with this application. Walkways: 18.705.030(F) requires that on-site pedestrian walkways comply with the following standards: Walkways shall extend from the ground floor entrances or from the ground floor landing of stairs, ramps, or elevators of all commercial, institutional, and industrial uses, to the streets which provide the required access and egress. Walkways shall provide convenient connections between buildings in multi-building commercial, institutional, and industrial complexes. Unless impractical, walkways shall be constructed between new and existing developments and neighboring developments; Existing sidewalks connect the parking.areas and buildings on-site. New walkways will extend from the Skate Park entrance to the adjacent parking area. Wherever required walkways cross vehicle access driveways or parking lots, such crossings shall be designed and located for pedestrian safety. Required walkways shall be physically separated from motor vehicle traffic and parking by either a minimum 6-inch vertical separation (curbed ) or a minimum 3-foot horizontal separation, except that pedestrian crossings of traffic aisles are permitted for distances no greater than 36 feet if appropriate landscaping, pavement markings or contrasting pavement materials are used. Walkways shall be a minimum of four feet in width exclusive of vehicle overhangs and obstructions such as mailboxes, benches, bicycle racks, and sign posts, and shall be in compliance with ADA standards; NOTICE OF TYPE II DECISION SDR2006-00005/TIGARD SKATE PARK PAGE 7 OF 27 The existing crossing between the City Hall North lot and the walkway by the Police headquarters has no markings to designate this as a pedestnan crossing. None of the proposed walkways cross an access drive. A condition will ensure the existing crossing meets current standards. FINDING: Not all walkways crossing vehicle access driveways are marked for pedestrian safety. Required walkways shall be paved with hard surfaced materials such as concrete, asphalt, stone, brick, etc. Walkways may be required to be lighted and/or signed as needed for safety purposes. Soft-surfaced public use pathways may be provided only if such pathways are provided in addition to required pathways. Walkways will be paved with concrete and lighted to ensure pedestrian safety. Access Management: Section 18.705.030.H.1 states that an access report shall be submitted with all new development proposals which verifies design of driveways and streets are safe by meeting adequate stacking needs, sight distance and deceleration standards as set by ODOT, Washington County, the City and AASHTO. Lancaster Engineering has provided preliminary intersection sight distance measurements in a memo to the applicant,dated October 2, 2006. The sight distance was measured at the two existing driveways that serve the site. he driveway on Burnham Street requires a minimum sight distance of 335 feet, based on a posted speed of 30 mph. The engineer states that the available sight distance to the west is unrestricted and the required minimum of 335 feet of sight distance is available. To the east the signalized intersection of Burnham Street and hall Boulevard is clearly visible. Burnham Street terminates at its Hall Boulevard with a T-intersection. The posted speed on Hall Boulevard north of the driveway on Hall Boulevard is 30 mph while the speed zone transitions to 40 mph immediately south of the driveway location. The engineer states that the sight distance to the south meets the minimum required 445 feet of sight distance. To the north the line of sight is restricted by vegetation and street trees on the inside of the horizontal curve of Hall Boulevard. Intersection sight distance was measured to be approximately 280 feet which does not meet the requirements for intersection sight distance. The engineer points out that when intersection sight distance is not available stopping sight distance is commonly examined. Stopping sight distance is considered the minimum measure for sate operation, since it is the minimum distance necessary for an oncoming driver to see an object in the travel lane and come to a complete stop if necessary to avoid a collision. For southbound traffic on Hall Boulevard approaching the main City Hall driveway,the stopping sight distance requirement is 200 feet based on the posted speed of 30 mph. Due to the horizontal curve and proximity of the traffic signal, actual travel speeds may be reduced somewhat,which would reduce the sight distance needed at the driveway. The engineer recommends that given the limited sight distance to the north from the main City Hall driveway one option for traffic circulation would be to encourage the use of the Burnham Street access for skate park traffic. By providing this second access to serve traffic from the skate park additional traffic on the main City Hall access can be minimized. Prior to issuance of permits, the applicant's engineer shall submit additional information regarding sight distance from the main City Hall driveway and how the sight distance will be improved with the trimming or removal of vegetation and street trees on the inside of the horizontal curve of Hall Boulevard. It is not typical to approve stopping sight distance in-lieu of intersection sight distance when there are measures that can be taken to improve intersection sight distance. Intersection sight distance must be maximized and then stopping sight distance may be considered. The recommended trimming or removal of vegetation and trees be required by the applicant prior to final inspection. Prior to issuance of permits,the ap licant shall submit a traffic circulation and signage plan that encourages skate park traffic to use the Burnham Street access. This plan shall be submitted to the Engineering Department for review and approval. Prior to final inspection the applicant's engineer shall submit final sight distance certification for both driveways. NOTICE OF TYPE II DECISION SDR2006-00005/TIGARD SKATE PARK PAGE 8 OF 27 Section 18.705.030.H.2 states that driveways shall not be permitted to be placed in the influence area of collector or arterial street intersections. Influence area of intersections is that area where queues of traffic commonly form on approach to an intersection. The minimum driveway setback from a collector or arterial street intersection shall be 150 feet, measured from the right-of-way line of the intersecting street to the throat of the proposed driveway. The setback may be greater depending upon the influence area, as determined from City Engineer review of a traffic impact report submitted by the applicant's traffic engineer. In a case where a project has less than 150 feet of street frontage,the applicant must explore any option for shared access with the adjacent parcel. If shared access is not possible or practical,the driveway shall be placed as far from the intersection as possible. The applicant did not address this section. The access on Burnham Street is only 117 feet from Hall Boulevard and after ROW dedication to ODOT will be 87 feet from the intersection. This clearly falls within the influence area of an arterial street intersection. The frontage along Burnham Street is approximately 165 feet, but will only be 135 feet in length after ROW dedication to ODOT. Therefore, prior to issuance of permits the applicant must explore any option for a shared access with the adjacent parcel or place the driveway as far from the intersection as possible. Section 18.705.030.H.3 and 4 states that the minimum spacing of driveways and streets along a collector shall be 200 feet. The minimum spacing of driveways and streets along an arterial shall be 600 feet. The minimum spacing of local streets along a local street shall be 125 feet. The driveway on Burnham Street is only 104 feet from the driveway to the west. Burnham Street is a Collector street requiring a minimum 200 feet spacing of driveways and streets. The driveway on Hall Boulevard is closer than 600 feet to several driveways and Burnham Street. Hall Boulevard is an Arterial requiring a minimum 600 feet spacing of driveways and streets. The applicant did not address this section and did not apply for an adjustment to this standard. Prior to issuance of permits the applicant shall apply for and receive approval of an adjustment to the spacing standard in accordance with 18.370. Minimum Access Requirements for Commercial and Industrial Use: Section 18.705.030.I provides the minimum access requirements for commercial and industrial uses: Table 18.705.3 indicates that the required access width for developments with more than 100 parking spaces is one 50-foot access with 40 feet of pavement or two 30-foot accesses with 24 feet of pavement. Vehicular access shall be provided to commercial or industrial uses, and shall be located within 50 feet of the primary ground floor entrances; additional requirements for truck traffic may be placed as conditions of site development review. The development will keep the two existing access points. Both access drives are approximately 30 feet wide with at least 24 feet of pavement. All buildings/structures on site have vehicular access within 30 feet of the primary floor entrances. FINDING: The access requirements can be met as conditioned below. CONDITION:Prior to site work the applicant shall submit a revised site plan for review and approval showing the walkway from the City Hall North parking lot to the sidewalk adjacent to Police headquarters marked with striping or contrasting pavement materials. Environmental performance standards (18.725): These standards require that federal and state environmental laws, rules and regulations be applied to development within the City of Tigard. Section 18.725.030 (Performance Standards) regulates: Noise,visible emissions,vibration and odors. Noise. For the purposes of noise regulation, the provisions of Sections 7.41.130 through 7.40.210 of the Tigard Municipal Code shall apply. NOTICE OF TYPE II DECISION SDR2006-00005/TIGARD SKATE PARK PAGE 9 OF 27 Visible Emissions. Within the commercial zoning districts and the industrial park (IP) zoning district, there shall be no use, operation or activity which results in a stack or other point- source emission, other than an emission from space heating, or the emission of pure uncombined water (steam) which is visible from a property line.Department of Environmental Quality(DEQ) rules for visible emissions (340-21-015 and 340-28-070) apply. Vibration. No vibration other than that caused by highway vehicles, trains and aircraft is permitted in any given zoning district which is discernible without instruments at the property line of the use concerned. Odors. The emissions of odorous gases or other matter in such quantities as to be readily detectable at any point beyond the property line of the use creating the odors is prohibited.DEQ rules for odors (340-028-090) apply. Glare and heat. No direct or sky reflected glare, whether from floodlights or from high temperature processes such as combustion or welding, which is visible at the lot line shall be permitted, and; 1) there shall be no emission or transmission of heat or heated air which is discernible at the lot line of the source; and 2) these regulations shall not apply to signs or floodlights in parking areas or construction equipment at the time of construction or excavation work otherwise permitted by this title. Insects and rodents. All materials including wastes shall be stored and all grounds shall be maintained in a manner which will not attract or aid the propagation of insects or rodents or create a health hazard. This is a community recreation use, which is permitted outright within the CBD zone. The applicant has indicated that the noise generated by the facility will be minimal. Even if the sound limits are exceeded there is an exception for such activity within the Tigard Municipal Code section 7.40.180: Non-amplified sounds created by organized athletic or other group activities, when such activities are conducted on property generally used for such purposes such as stadiums, parks, schools, and athletic fields, during normal hours for such events. There will be no known or expected emissions, vibrations or odors generated by the skate park No lighting is provided because the park will only be open during daylight hours. All waste will be stored in proper containers as not to attract rodents or insects. Garbage cans with enclosures are proposed for the park. Ongoing maintenance to meet these standards shall be maintained and any violation of these standards will be addressed by the City of Tigard's'Code Enforcement Officer. FINDING: The Environmental Performance Standards are satisfied. Landscaping and Screening(18.745): 18.745.030.0 Installation Requirements The installation of all landscaping shall be as follows: All landscaping shall be installed according to accepted planting procedures. The accepted planting procedures are the guidelines described in the Tigard Tree Manual. These guidelines follow those set forth by the International Society of Arboriculture (ISA) tree planting guidelines as well as the standards set forth in the American Institute of Architects' Architectural Graphic Standards, 10th edition. In the Architectural Graphic Standards there are guidelines for selecting and planting trees based on the soil volume and size at maturity. Additionally, there are directions for soil amendments and modifications. In order to develop tree species diversity onsite the following guidelines shall be followed: • No more than 30% of any one family be planted onsite. • No more than 20% of any one genus be planted onsite. • No more than 10% of any one species be planted onsite. The plant material shall be of high grade, and shall meet the size and grading standards of the American Standards for Nurberg Stock (ANSI Z-60, 1-1986, and any other future revisions); and landscaping shall be installed in accordance with the provisions of this title. Certificate of Occupancy. Certificates of occupancy shall not be issued unless the landscaping requirements have been met or other arrangements have been made and approved by the City such as the posting of a bond. NOTICE OF TYPE II DECISION SDR2006-00005/TIGARD SKATE PARK PAGE 10 OF 27 Pursuant to findings in 18.790.030.B below,tree mitigation will not be required. Protection of Existing Landscaping. Existing vegetation on a site shall be protected as much as possible: 1. The developer shall provide methods for the protection of existing vegetation to remain dunng the construction process; and 2. The plants to be saved shall be noted on the landscape plans (e.g., areas not to be disturbed can be fenced, as in snow fencing which can be placed around the individual trees). The applicant shall establish fencing as directed by the project arborist to rotect the trees to be retained. Tree protection fencing is described in the Arborist Report as orange snow fencing placed one foot for every inch of trunk diameter. Fore le, a 14-inch tree will have a tree protection zone of 14 feet from the face of the trunk The applicant show access by the City Staff for the purpose of monitoring inspection of the tree protection to verify that the tree protection measures are performing adequately. Failure to follow the plan, or maintain tree protection fencing in the designated locations shall be grounds for immediate suspension of work on the site until remediation measures and/or civil citations can be processed. Street Trees: Section 18.745.040 states that all development projects fronting on a public street or a private drive more than 100 feet in length shall be required to plant street trees in accordance with Section 18.745.040.E Section 18.745.040.0 requires that street trees be spaced between 20 and 40 feet apart depending on the size classification of the tree at maturity(small,medium or large). Street trees already exist along both street frontages. Per the preliminary site distance prepared by Lancaster Engineering these trees interfere with s' ht distance to the north. In order to alleviate this problem, the engineer suggests trimming or removal of vegetation,which may include street trees. FINDING: Removal of street trees may take the development out of compliance with the standards. Buffering and Screening: Section 18.745.080 states that no buffer is required between abutting uses that are of a different type when the uses are separated by a street. No buffer is required between a proposed office use and existing office use. Buffering and/or screening are required for dissimilar uses. The site is bordered by commercial uses to the west and streets to the north and east. Residential properties border the City Hall complex to the south, but the Permit Center building, greenway and Fanno Creek he between the proposed park and the residences. In addition these homes are approximately 600 feet south of the proposed-park No additional buffering is required for this proposal. Screening: Special Provisions: Section 18.745.050.E requires the screening of parking and loading areas. Landscaped parking areas shall include special design features which effectively screen the parking lot areas from view. Planting matenals to be installed should achieve a relative balance between low lying and vertical shrubbery and trees. Trees shall be planted in landscaped islands in all parking areas, and shall be equally distributed on the basis of one (1) tree for each seven(7) parkin spaces m order to provide a canopy effect. The minimum dimension on the landscape islands shall be three (3) feet wide and the landscaping shall be protected from vehicular damage-by some form of wheel guard or curb. The site has existing landscaping along the edges of the parking areas. New landscaping is being added between the proposed skate park and the existing parking area. No details were,given about the type of plantings to be used. Trees proposed within the modified parking areas are equally distributed. FINDING: Staff is unable to determine if the proposed landscaping includes a mix of low lying and vertical plantings. NOTICE OF TYPE II DECISION SDR2006-00005/TIGARD SKATE PARK PAGE 11 OF 27 Screening Of Service Facilities. Except for one-family and two-family dwellings, any refuse container or disposal area and service facilities such as gas meters and air conditioners which would otherwise be visible from a public street, customer or resident parking area, any public facility or any residential area shall be screened from view by placement ofa solid wood fence or masonry wall between five and eight feet in height. All refuse materials shall be contained within the screened area; No new service facilities are proposed with this application. This standard is not applicable. Screening Of Refuse Containers. Except for one- and two-family dwellings, any refuse container or refuse collection area which would be visible from a public street, parking lot, residential or commercial area, or any public facility such as a school or park shall be screened or enclosed from view by placement of a solid wood fence, masonry wall or evergreen hedge. All refuse shall be contained within the screened area. No new refuse collection areas areproposed with this application, but garbage cans are proposed to be placed within the park. These most likely be 32 gallon cans with enc osures. The applicant has provided photos of the enclosures. This standard has been met. FINDING: Based on the analysis above,the landscaping and screening standards have not been fully met. If the applicant complies with the condition listed below,the standards will be met. CONDITIONS: • Prior to site work the applicant shall submit for review and approval a landscape plan showing the types,size and number of plantings to be installed. • If street trees are removed to meet site distance requirements then street trees shall be replaced to meet the current standards, outside of the site distance line. A site plan showing the size and species of the proposed street trees shall be submitted for review and approval. Mixed Solid Waste and Recyclables Storage(18.755): Chapter 18.755 requires that new construction incorporates functional and adequate space for on-site storage and efficient collection of mixed solid waste and source separated Recyclables prior to pick- up and removal by haulers. The applicant must choose one (1) of the followin four (4) methods to demonstrate compliance: Minimum Standard, Waste Assessment, Comprehensive Recycling Plan, or Franchised Hauler Review and Sign-Off. The applicant will have to submit evidence or a plan which indicates compliance with this section. Regardless of which method chosen,the applicant will have to submit a wntten sign-off from the franchise hauler regarding the facility location and compatibility. Location Standards. To encourage its use the storage area for source-separated recyclables shall be co-located with the storage area for residual mixed solid waste; Indoor and outdoor storage areas shall comply with Uniform Building and Fire Code requirements; Storage area space requirements can be satisfied with a single location or multiple locations, and can combine both interior and exterior locations; Exterior storage areas can be located within interior side yard or rear yard areas. Exterior storage areas shall not be located within a required front yard setback or in a yard adjacent to a public or private street; Exterior storage areas shall be located in central and visible locations on a site to enhance security for users; Exterior storage areas can be located in a arking area, if the proposed use provides at least the minimum number of parking spaces required for the use after deducting the area used for storage. Storage areas shall be appropriately screened according to the provisions in 18.755.050 C, design standards; The storage area shall be accessible for collection vehicles and located so that the storage area will not obstruct pedestrian or vehicle traffic movement on the site or on public streets adjacent to the site. NOTICE OF TYPE II DECISION SDR2006-00005/TIGARD SKATE PARK PAGE 12 OF 27 Design Standards. The dimensions of the storage area shall accommodate containers consistent with current methods of local collection; Storage containers shall meet Uniform Fire Code standards and be made and covered with waterproof-materials or situated in a covered area; Exterior storage areas shall be enclosed by a sight-obscuring fence wall, or hedge at least six feet in height. Gate openings which allow access to users and haulers shall be provided. Gate openings for haulers shall be a minimum of 10 feet wide and shall be capable of being secured in a closed and open position; Storage area(s) and containers shall be clearlylabeled to indicate the type of materials accepted. No changes are proposed to the storage areas for Mixed Solid Waste and Recyclable storage. FINDING: The Mixed Solid Waste and Recyclable Storage standards are not applicable. Off-Street Parking and Loading(18.765): Location of vehicle parking: Off-street parking spaces for single-family and duplex dwellings and single-family attached g dwellings shall be located on the same lot with the dwellings. street parking lots for uses not listed above shall be located not further than 200 feet from the building or use that they are required to serve, measured in a straight line from the building with the following exceptions: a) commercial and industrial uses which require more than 40 parking spaces may provide for the spaces in excess of the required first 40 spaces up.to a distance of 300 feet feet the primary site; The 40 parking spaces which remain on the primary site must be available for users in the following order of priority: 1) Disabled-accessible spaces; 2) Short-term spaces; 3) Long-term preferential carpool and vanpool spaces; 4) Long-term spaces. The parking lots associated with this project are directly adjacent to the proposed skate park, in compliance with this standard. Joint Parking: Owners of two or more uses, structures or parcels of land may agree to utilize jointly the same parking and loading spaces when the peak hours of operation do not overlay, subject to the following: 1) The size of the oint parking facility shall be at least as large as the number of vehicle parking spaces required 1 y the larger(est) use per Section 18.765.070; 2) Satisfactory legal evidence shall be presented to the Director in the form of deeds, leases or contracts to establish the joint use; 3) If a oint use arrangement is subsequently ternunated, or if the uses change,the requirements of this title thereafter apply to each separately. Shared parking already exists between the different uses found on the City Hall site (Permit Center,City Hall, the Niche and Police). In addition to parking for these uses, there are 16 overflow spaces reserved for the Tigard Library. These overflow spaces were approved through Conditional Use Permit (CUP2003-00001) and must be considered in the City Hall parking until they are provided for at another location. All the uses are associated with the City of Tigard and therefore a joint parking agreement is not necessary. The minimum number of parking spaces required for this development is based on a mixed use project as outlined below. Parking in Mixed-Use Projects: In mixed-use projects, the required minimum vehicle parking shall be determined using the following formula. 1) Primary use, i.e., that with the largest proportion of total floor area within the development, at 100% of the minimum vehicle arking required for that use in Section 18.765.060; 2) Secondary use,i.e., that with the second largest percentage of total floor area within the development, at 90% of the vehicle parking required for that use in Section 18.765.060; 3) Subsequent use or uses, at 80% of the vehicle parking required for that use(s) in Section 18.765.060; 4) The maximum parking allowance shall be 150% of the total minimum parking as calculated above. NOTICE OF TYPE II DECISION SDR2006-00005/TIGARD SKATE PARK PAGE 13 OF 27 • Minimum Based on Minimum Parking Use Total Square Footage Table 18.765.2 Requirement Office (100%) 29,900 2.7/1,000 sq.ft. 81 Community Recreation(90%) 15,000 2.0/1,000 sq.ft. 27 Emergency Services (80%) 11,000 3.0/1,000 sq.ft. 27 Town Hall(80%) 90[1] 1.0/3 seats 24 Total N/A N/A 159 [1]Based on the maximum capacity allowed for room reservation. Town Hall has a maximum capacity of 195 based on the Uniform Building Code. The minimum parking requirement for the development is 159. Maximum at 150% of the minimum is 248 parking spaces. Minimum parking is not met at this time. The applicant has proposed alleviating the shortage by limiting the times Town Hall is available for reservation. Alter 5 p.m. most employees have left work and more spaces will be vacant. Limiting the room availability is not possible because it is used for Tigard Municipal Court. The applicant is short by 17 spaces and is being conditioned to provide those spaces within the area required by code (18.765.030.B.2). The calculations below reveal the shortage. Total Parking 222 Fleet Parking 64 Library Reserve Parking 16 Total Available Parking 142 Shortage 17 spaces FINDING: The minimum parking reqqu� i�rements are not met as proposed. Even if the minimum parking requirements are met, parka g_may.still be an issue on the site. City Hall functions much: differently from many uses. There is a high demand for parking on the site. In addition to empplo� es and fleet vehicles the lot also supplies parking for court, visitors to City Hall/Permit Center/Police and for meetings in Town Hall. Overflow parking for the Tigard Library is also provided on this site. Visitor Parking in Multi-Family Residential Developments: Multi-dwelling units with more than 10 required parking spaces shall provide an additional 15% of vehicle parking spaces above the minimum required for the use o} guests of residents of the complex. These spaces shall be centrally located or distributed throughout the development. Required bicycle parking facilities shall also be centrally located within or evenly distributed throughout the development. This project does not involve a residential use. Therefore,this standard does not apply. Preferential Long-Term Carpool/Vanpool Parking: Parking lots providing in excess of 20 long-term parking spaces shall provide preferential long-term carpool and vanpool parking for employees, students and other regular visitors to the site. At least 5% of total long-term parking spaces shall be reserved for carpool/vanpool use. Preferential parking for carpools/vanpools shall be closer to the main entrances of the building than any other employee or student parking except parking spaces designated for use by the disabled. Preferential carpool/vanpool spaces shall be lull-sized-per requirements in Section 18.765.040N and shall be clearly designated for use only by carpools and vanpools between 7:00 AM and 5:30 PM Monday through Friday. The required minimum long-term parking spaces based on square footage are 135. The Town Hall spaces are not included in this figure. Seven carpool7vanpool spaces are proposed. This meets the 5% requirement. These stalls will be located near the entrances to each building. This standard is met. Disabled-Accessible Parking: All parking areas shall be provided with the required number of parking spaces for disabled persons as specified by the State of Oregon Uniform Building Code and federal standards. Such parking spaces shall be sized,signed and marked as required by these regulations. NOTICE OF TYPE II DECISION SDR2006-00005/TIGARD SKATE PARK PAGE 14 OF 27 Based on the 2004 Oregon Structural Specialty Code the applicant must provide 7 accessible parking spaces. Only 6 are shown on the site plan. The applicant indicates that each space will be sized, signed and marked as required by law. Final determination of the number of required ADA spaces will be made by the building official during the review of the building permit application. As shown, the site plan does not comply with the ADA requirements. A condition will ensure the requirements can be met. DEQ indirect source construction permit: All parking lots containing 250 spaces or parking structures containing two or more levels shall require review by the Oregon Department of Environmental Quality (DEQ) to: 1. Acquire an Indirect Source Construction Permit; or 2. Investigate the feasibility of installing oil and grease separators There are only 222 spaces proposed for the parking area. This standard is not applicable. Access Drives: With regard to access to public streets from off-street parking: access drives from the street to off- street parking or loading areas shall be designed and constructed to facilitate the flow of traffic and provide maximum safety for pedestrian and vehicular traffic on the site; the number and size of access drives shall be in accordance with the requirements of Chapter, 18.705 Access, Egress and Circulation• access drives shall be clearly and permanently marked and defined through use of rails, fences, walls or other barriers or markers on frontage not occupied by service drives; access drives shall have a minimum vision clearance in accordance with Chapter 18.795, Visual Clearance; access drives shall be improved with an asphalt or concrete surface; and excluding single-family and duplex residences, except as provided by Subsection 18.810.030.P, groups of two or more parking spaces shall be served by a service drive so that no backing movements or other maneuvering within a street or other public right-of-way will be required. The access drive has been addressed previously in this decision under Chapter 18.705 (Access,Egress and Circulation). Pedestrian Access: Pedestrian access through parking lots shall be provided in accordance with Section 18.705.030.F. Where a parking area or other vehicle area has a drop-off grade separation, the property owner shall install a wall, railing, or other barrier which will prevent a slow-moving vehicle or driverless vehicle from escaping such area and which will prevent pedestrians from walking over drop-off edges. There are no drop-off grade separated areas within the parking area. Parking Lot Striping: Except for single-family and duplex residences, any area intended to be used to meet the off-street parking requirements as contained in this Chapter shall have all parking spaces clearly marked; and all interior drives and access aisles shall be clearly marked and signed to show direction of flow and maintain vehicular and pedestrian safety. The plans submitted show the parking spaces are clearly marked with striping. Access aisles are clearly marked by landscape islands setting the direction of flow. There is a one-way access aisle with pavement markings. Wheel Stops: Parking spaces along the boundaries of a parking lot or adjacent to interior landscaped areas or sidewalks shall be provided with a wheel stop at least four inches high located three feet back from the front of the parking stall. The front three feet of the parking stall may be concrete, asphalt or low lying landscape material that does not exceed the height of the wheel stop. This area cannot be calculated to meet landscaping or sidewalk requirements. Curbing or wheel stops are provided along all landscaped areas or boundaries of the parking lot. This criterion has been met. NOTICE OF TYPE II DECISION SDR2006-00005/TIGARD SKATE PARK PAGE 15 OF 27 • Space and Aisle Dimensions: Section 18.765.040.N states that: "except as modified for angled parking in Figures 18.765.1 and 18.765.2 the minimum dimensions for parking spaces are: 8.5 feet x 18.5 feet for a standard space and 7.5 feet x 16.5 feet for a compact space"; aisles accommodating two direction traffic, or allowing access from both ends, shall be 24 feet in width. No more than 50% of the required spaces may be compact spaces. Based on the site lan, most of the standard parking spaces measure 18.5 by 8.5 feet. Compact spaces measure 8 feet x 16.5 feet. All new aisles are 24 feet or greater in width to provide for two-way traffic flow, except the one-way aisles in the Niche parking lot. This area has angled parkingwhich only requires an 11-foot aisle. The applicant has proposed a fifteen-foot aisle. Staff has scaled off from the site plans submitted to confirm that the existing parking layout meets the standards. Bicycle Parking Location and Access: Section 18.76550 states bicycle parking areas shall be provided at locations within 50 feet of primary entrances to structures; bicycle parking areas shall not be located within parking aisles, landscape areas or pedestrian ways; outdoor bicycle parking shall be visible from on-site buildings and/or the street. When the bicycle parking area is not visible from the street, directional signs shall be used to located the parking area; and bicycle parking may be located inside a building on a floor which has an outdoor entrance open for use and floor location which does not require the bicyclist to use stairs to gain access to the space. Exceptions may be made to the latter requirement for parking on upper stories within a multi-story residential building. Bicycle parking is provided near the entrances of the existing City Hall/Permit Center/Police. Additional bicycle parking is proposed within a landscape island between the Niche building.and the entrance to the skate park All bicycle parking may not be visible from the street, but the paring_is provided in such close proximity to the build' entrances that signage is not necessary. The racks are-located so pedestrian and vehicular traffic will not Be impeded. Bicycle Parking Design Requirements: Section 18.765 050.C.gThe following design requirements apply to the installation of bicycle racks: The racks required for required bicycle parking spaces shall ensure that bicycles may be securely locked to them without undue inconvenience. Provision of bicycle lockers for long-term (employee) parking is encouraged but not required; bicycle racks must be securely anchored to the ground, wall or other structure; bicycle parking spaces shall be at least 21/2 feet by six feet long, and when covered,with a vertical clearance of seven feet. An access aisle of at least five feet wide shad be provided and maintained beside or between each row of bicycle parking; each required bicycle parking space must be accessible without moving another bicycle; required bicycle parking spaces may not be rented or leased except where required motor vehicle parking is rented or leased. At-cost or deposit fees for bicycle parking are exempt from this requirement; and areas set aside for required bicycle parking must be clearly reserved for bicycle parking only. Outdoor bicycle parking facilities shall-be surfaced with a hard surfaced material, i.e., pavers, asphalt, concrete or similar material. This surface must be designed to remain well drained. New bicycle parking is shown on the site plan near the entrance to the skate park facility. A 5-space,"wave" rack will be installed. The parking is not covered. Proposed surfacing is concrete. The location provides for easy access,but no detail of the bike rack was provided. Minimum Bicycle Parking Requirements: The total number of required bicycle parking spaces for each use is specified in Table 18.765.2 in Section 18.765.070.H. In no case shall there be less than two bicycle parking spaces. According to Table 18.765.2 of the Tigard Development Code, the minimum bicycle-parking requirement for a community recreation use is .3 spaces per 1,000 gross square feet. Five spaces are required for the park The applicant has proposed 5;therefore this standard has been met. Minimum Off-Street Parking: Section 18.765.070.H states that the minimum and maximum parking shall be as required in Table 18.765.2. NOTICE OF TYPE II DECISION SDR2006-00005/TIGARD SKATE PARK PAGE 16 OF 27 The minimum off-street parking requirements have been previously discussed under the Mixed Use Projects portion of this section. The minimum requirement has not been met, but the applicant is conditioned to show how the standards can be met. Off-Street Loading Spaces: Commercial, industrial and institutional buildings or structures to be built or altered which receive and distribute material or merchandise by truck shall provide and maintain off-street loading and maneuvering space as follows: A minimum of one loading space is required for buildings with 10,000 ross square feet or more; A minimum of two loading spaces for buildings with 40,000 gross square-ffeet or more. The applicant has proposed a new, 15,000 square foot skate park. The total square footage of the buildings is 55,900. The uses within the City Hall project do not receive and distribute materials or merchandise on a regular basis. Regardless several short term spaces are available within the circular drive near the City Hall building. This standard has been met. FINDING: Based on the analysis above, the off-street parking and loading standards have not been completely met;as conditioned above the code requirements can be satisfied. CONDITIONS: Prior to site/building permit issuance the applicant shall provide a plan for review and approval that shows the minimum parking requirements are being met by providing an additional 17 arking spaces. These spaces shall not be further than 500 feet from the primary site (11)C 18.765.030.B). The applicant shall provide for review and approval a detail of the bike racks to be used. Signs (18.780): Chapter 18.780.130.0 lists the type of allowable signs and sign area permitted in the C-G Zoning District. There are no proposed signs with this application other than signs for designated parking and park hours. These signs are exempt from permit, so this section does not apply. If any signage is to be installed in the future,a sign permit is required. CONDITION: A separate sign permit will be required for all future signage prior to installation. Tree Removal(18.790): Section 18.790.030 requires a tree plan for the planting, removal and protection of trees prepared by a certified arborist shall be provided for any lot, parcel or combination of lots or parcels for which a development application for a subdivision, partition, site development review planned development or conditional use is filed. Protection is pre}erred over removal wherever possible. As required,the applicant submitted a tree plan conducted by Matt Stine,a certified arborist and City Forester at the time of application. The report contains the four required components and is therefore acceptable. Plan requirements. The tree plan shall include the following: 1. Identification of the location, size and species of all existing trees including trees designated as significant by the city; The Arborist Report identified the location, size and species of all existing trees, consistent with this standard. 2. Identification of a program to save existing trees or mitigate tree removal over 12 inches in caliper. Mitigation must follow the repracement guidelines of Section 18.790.060D, in accordance with the following standards and shall be exclusive of trees required by other development code provisions for landscaping, streets and parking lots: NOTICE OF TYPE II DEQSION SDR2006-00005/TIGARD SKATE PARK PAGE 17 OF 27 a. Retention of less than 25% of existing trees over 12 inches in caliper requires a mitigation program in accordance with Section 18.790.060D of no net loss of trees; b. Retention of from 25% to 50% of existing trees over 12 inches in caliper requires that two-thirds of the trees to be removed be mitigated in accordance with Section 18.790.060D; c. Retention of from 50% to 75% of existing trees over 12 inches in caliper requires that 50 percent of the trees to be removed be mitigated in accordance with Section 18.790.060D; d. Retention of 75% or greater of existing trees over 12 inches in caliper requires no mitigation. The applicant's tree removal plan indicates the trees on the property that are to remain and those proposed for removal. There are a total of 7 trees on site greater than 12 inches which are subject to mitigation. Three (3) trees are slated for removal,but none are over 12 inch dbh. Therefore, 100% of the trees will be retained. According to the mitigation schedule above,no mitigation is required. 3. Identification of all trees which are proposed to be removed; All of the trees proposed to be removed are identified in the applicant's survey and site plan. 4. A protection program defining standards and methods that will be used by the applicant to protect trees uring and after construction. The guidelines for tree protection are outlined in the arborist report. 18.790.040 Incentives for Tree Retention B. Subsequent removal of a tree. Any tree preserved or retained in accordance with this section may thereafter be removed only for the reasons set out in a tree plan in accordance with Section 18.790.030, or as a condition of approval for a conditional use, and shall not be subject to removal under any other section of this chapter. The property owner shall record a deed restriction as a condition of approval of any development permit affected by this section to the effect that such tree may be removed only if the tree dies or is hazardous according to a certified arborist The deed restriction may be removed or will be considered invalid if a tree reserved in accordance with this section should either die or be removed as a hazardous tree. The-form of this deed restriction shall be subject to approval by the Director. A condition of approval will ensure that this standard is met. CONDITIONS: • Tree Protection - Prior to any site work the applicant shall install all proposed tree protection fencing The fencing shall be inspected and approved by the Project Arborist and CityPlanner (Cher)1 Caines) prior to commencing any site work. The tree protection fencing shall remain in place through the duration of all of the building construction phases,until the Certificate of Occupancy has been approved. • Prior to issuance of building permits, the applicant shall submit site plan drawings indicating the location of the trees that were preserved on the lot during site development, location of tree protection fencing, and a signature of approval from the project arborist regarding the placement and construction techniques to be employed in building the structures. All proposed protection fencing _shall be installed and inspected prior to commencing construction. The fencing shall remain in place through the duration of all of the building construction phases, until the Certificate of Occupancy has been approved. After approval from the City Forester, the tree protection measures may be removed. NOTICE OF TYPE II DECISION SDR2006-00005/T1GARD SKATE PARK PAGE 18 OF 27 • The applicant shall have an on-going responsibility to ensure that the Project Arbonst has submitted written reports to the Planning Department (Cheryl Caines), at least once every two weeks, as the Project Arbonst monitors the construction activities from initial tree protection zone (1PZ) fencing installation through the building construction phases. The reports shall evaluate the condition and location of the tree protection fencing, determine if any changes occurred to the TPZ, and if any part of-the Tree Protection Plan has been violated. If the amount of TPZ was reduced then the Project Arborist shall justify why the fencing was moved and shall certify that the construction activities did not adversely impact the overall, long-term health and stability of the tree(s). If the reports are not submitted to the City at the scheduled intervals, and if it appears the TPZ's or the Tree Protection Plan are not being followed by the contractor or a sub-contractor,the City can stop_work on the project until an inspection can be done by City Staff and the Project Arborist. Prior to issuance of any Certificates of Occupancy,the Project Arborist will submit a final certification indicating the elements of- ree Protection Plan were followed and that all remaining trees on the site are healthy, stable, and viable in their modified growing environment. • Deed Restriction Prior to issuance of any Certificates of Occupancy;the applicant/owner shall record a deed restriction to the effect that any existing tree greater than 12" diameter maybe removed only if the tree dies or is hazardous according to a certified arborist. The deed restriction may be removed or will be considered-invalid if a tree preserved in accordance with this decision should either die or be removed as a hazardous tree. Visual Clearance Areas (18.795): Chapter 18.795 requires that a clear vision area shall be maintained on the corners of all property adjacent to intersectrn right-of-ways or the intersection of a public street and a private driveway. A clear vision area shall-contain no vehicle, hedge, planting, fence, wall structure, or temporary or permanent obstruction exceeding three (3) feet in height. The code provides that obstructions that may be located in this area shall be visually clear between three (3) and eight (8) feet in height (8) (trees may be placed within this area provided that all branches below eight 8) feet are removed). A visual clearance area is the triangular area formed by measuring a 30-foot distance along the street right-of-way and the driveway, and then connecting these two(2 ), 30-foot distance points with a straight line. Developments within the CBD zone are exempt from vision clearance requirements based on 18.795.030A This is because the develo ment typically found in central business districts are pedestrian-oriented and designed to slow down traffic. In this particular case, the major access point to City.Hall is onto SW Hall Boulevard, an arterial street. The vision clearance area is measured along the new right-of-way line. The proposed skate park wall and fence are within that area. If and when Hall oulevard is widened, a hazardous traffic situation will be created. The drivers will need to creep onto the sidewalk and into the bike lane to determine if vehicles are approaching from the left. It will simply be dangerous for pedestrians as well as cars entering onto the street. n order to avoid this situation the portion o the skate park structure within the vision clearance area should be removed from the development plan at the time of widening Hall Boulevard. FINDING: The criterion has been met regarding visual clearance areas;but due to the future creation of a hazardous traffic situation,the vision clearance requirements will need to be met if and when Hall Boulevard is widened. ODNDITION:When Hall Boulevard is widened,the current visual clearance requirements shall be met unless a Site Distance Certification is provided that shows the site distance requirements can be met. C. SPECIFIC SITE DEVELOPMENT REVIEW APPROVAL STANDARDS Section 18.360.090(A)(2) through 18.360.090(A)(15) provides additional Site Development Review approval standards not necessarily covered by the provisions of the previously listed sections. These additional standards are addressed immediately below with the following exceptions: The proposal contains no elements related to the provisions of the following and are, therefore, found to be inapplicable as approval standards: NOTICE OF TYPE II DECISION SDR2006-00005/TIGARD SKATE PARK PAGE 19 OF 27 18.360.090.3 (Multi Family Exterior Elevations); 18.360.090.5 (Privacy and Noise: Multi-family or Group Living Uses); 18.360.090.6 (Private Outdoor Areas: Multi-family Use); 18.360.090.7 (Shared Outdoor Recreation Areas: Multi-family Use); 18.360.090.8 (100-year floodplain); and 18.360.090.9 (Demarcation of Spaces). The following sections were discussed elsewhere in this decision and, therefore, will not be addressed in this section: 18.360.090.4 (Buffering, Screening and Compatibility Between Ado' ' g Uses; 18.360.090.13 (Parking); 18.360.090.14 (Landscaping); 18.360.090.15 (Drainage);and 18.360.090.14 (Provision for the Disabled). Relationship to the Natural and Physical Environment: Buildings shall be: located to.preserve existing trees, topography and natural drainage where possible based upon existing, site conditions; located in areas not subject to ground slumping or sliding; located to provide adequate distance between adjoining buildings for adequate light, air circulation, and fire-fighting; and oriented with consideration for sun and wind. Trees shall be preserved to the extent possible. Replacement of trees is subject to the requirements of Chapter 8.790, Tree Removal. The proposed skate park location is proposed within an existing parking lot. Three existing landscape trees less than 12 inch caliper will be removed. All other trees on-site are being retained. This is not in an area identified as prone to sliding. The Soil Survey_of Washington County, Oregon (United States Soil Conservation Service, 1982) indicates that surface soils consist of Aloha Silt Loam. These soils are very deep and moderately to well-drained. There are no other buildings immediately adjacent to the skate park,adequate distance is provided for air circulation,light and fire-fighting. Demarcation of public,semi-public and private spaces for crime prevention: a.The structures and site improvements shall be designed so that public areas such as streets or public gathering places, semi-public areas and private outdoor areas are clearly defined to establish personslliaving a right to be in the space, to provide for crime prevention and to establish maintenance responsibility;and b.These areas may be defined by,but not limited to: 1 A deck,patio low wall,hedge,or draping vine; 2 A trellis or athor, 3 A change in elevation or rade; 4 A change in the texture ofthe path material; 5 Sign;or 6 Landscaping The skate park will only be open during daylight hours. Hours and rules will be clearly marked. The perimeter of the park will be fenced to restrict access at night. Maintenance will be provided by the City's Public Works department. The Tigard Police headquarters is located on the site, which will also deter crime around the facility. Crime Prevention and Safety: Windows shall be located so that areas vulnerable to crime can be surveyed by the occupants; A. Interior laundry and service areas shall be located in a way that they can be observed by others; B. Mail boxes shall be located in lighted areas having vehicular or pedestrian traffic; C. The exterior lighting levels shall be selected and-the angles shall be oriented towards areas vulnerable to crime; and D. Light fixtures shall be provided in areas having heavy pedestrian or vehicular traffic and in potentially dangerous areas such as parking lots, stairs, ramps and abrupt grade changes. Fixtures shall be placed at a height so that-light patterns overlap at a height of seven feet, which is sufficient to illuminate a person. No lighting plan was provided because the park will only be open during daylight hours. Existing lighting,will illuminate the parking areas and other parts of the City Hall site. The Tigard Police Department was provided an opportunity to comment on the proposed development. The concerns are included under the staff comments section of this report. NOTICE OF TYPE II DECISION SDR2006-00005/TIGARD SKATE PARK PAGE 20 OF 27 Public Transit: Provisions within the plan shall be included for providing for transit if the development proposal is adjacent to an existing or proposed transit route; the requirements for transit facilities shall be based on: the location of other transit facilities in the area; and the size and type of the proposal. The following facilities may be required after City and Tri-Met review: bus stop shelters; turnouts for buses; and connecting paths to the shelters. The subject site is adjacent to an existing transit route (Tri met route 76). The nearest bus stop is adjacent to the site on Hall Boulevard. A sidewalk is provided from the new facility to the public sidewalk along Hall Boulevard. No new facilities are proposed with this application. Tn-met was given an opportunity to comment on the proposed development and no responses were received. FINDING: Based on the analysis above,the Site Development Review standards have been satisfied. D. STREET AND UTILITY IMPROVEMENTS STANDARDS Chapter 18.810 provides construction standards for the implementation of public and private facilities and utilities such as streets, sewers, and drainage. The applicable standards are addressed below: Streets: Improvements: Section 18.810.030.A.1 states that streets within a development and streets adjacent shall be improved in accordance with the TDC standards. Section 18.810.030.A.2 states that any new street or additional street width planned as a portion of an existing street shall be dedicated and improved in accordance with the TDC. Minimum Rights-of-Way and Street Widths: Section 18.810.030.E requires an Arterial street to have a 104 right-of-way width and 36-foot paved section. Other improvements required may include on-street parking, sidewalks and bikeways, underground utilities, street lighting, storm drainage,and street trees. This site lies adjacent to SW Hall Boulevard, which is classified as an Arterial on the City of Tigard Transportation adjacent Map. At present, there is approximately 30 feet of ROW from centerline, according to the most recent tax assessor's map. The applicant should dedicate the additional ROW to ODOT to provide 52 feet of ROW from centerline for the entire frontage length of tax lots 2S102DA00400 and 2S102DA00401. Minimum Rights-of-Way and Street Widths: Section 18.810.030.E requires a Collector street to have a 74 right- of-way width and 23-foot paved section. Other improvements required may include on-street parking, sidewalks and bikeways, underground utilities, street lighting, storm drainage, and street trees. This site lies adjacent to SW Burnham Street, which is classified as a Collector on the City of Tigard Transportation adjacent Map. At present, there is approximately 20 feet of ROW from centerline, according to the most recent tax assessors map. The applicant should dedicate the additional ROW to provide 37.5 feet from centerline plus the additional ROW for the radius at the intersection. Block Designs - Section 18.810.040.A states that the length, width and shape of blocks shall be designed with due regard to providing adequate building sites for the use contemplated consideration of needs or convenient access, circulation, control and safety of street traffic and recognition of limitations and opportunities of topography. Block Sizes: Section 18.810.040.B.1 states that the perimeter of blocks formed by streets shall not exceed 1,800 feet measured along the right-of-way line except: • Where street location is precluded by natural topography, wetlands or other bodies of water or,pre-existing development or, • For blocks adjacent to arterial streets,limited access highways,major collectors or railroads. • For non-residential blocks in which internal public circulation provides equivalent access. NOTICE OF TYPE II DEQSION SDR2006-00005/TIGARD SKATE PARK PAGE 21 OF 27 The site is located near the intersection of a collector and an arterial. Due to existing commercial development in the area and Fanno Creek to the south, there are no opportunities to provide a through street and meet the block size requirements. Section 18.810.040.B.2 also states that bicycle and pedestrian connections on public easements or right-of-ways shall be provided when full street connection is not possible. Spacing between connections shall be no more than 330 feet, except where precluded by environmental or topographical constraints, existing development patterns, or strict adherence to other standards in the code. Bicycle and pedestrian connections already exists across Fanno Creek to the south within Fanno Creek Park Lots - Size and Shape: Section 18.810.060(A) prohibits lot depth from being more than 2.5 times the average lot width, unless the parcel is less than 1.5 times the minimum Tot size of the applicable zoning district. Lot Frontage: Section 18.810.060(B) requires that lots have at least 25 feet of frontage on public or private streets, other than an alley. In the case of a land partition, 18.420.050.A.4.c applies, which requires a parcel to either have a minimum 15-foot frontage or a minimum 15-foot wide recorded access easement. In cases where the lot is for an attached single-family dwelling unit, the frontage shall be at least 15 feet. No new parcels are being created with this project. These standards do not apply. Sidewalks: Section 18.810.070.A requires that sidewalks be constructed to meet City design standards and be located on both sides of arterial, collector and local residential streets. Private streets and industrial streets shall have sidewalks on at least one side. There are existing sidewalks along the Hall Boulevard and Burnham Street frontages. The sidewalks are not at their ultimate design location. This development is not required to relocate the sidewalks. Sanitary Sewers: Sewers Required: Section 18.810.090.A requires that sanitary sewer be installed to serve each new development and to connect developments to existing mains in accordance with the provisions set forth in Design and Construction Standards for Sanitary and Surface Water Management(as adopted by the Unified Sewerage Agency in 1996 and including any future revisions or amendments) and the adopted policies of the comprehensive plan. Over-sizing: Section 18.810.090.0 states that proposed sewer systems shall include consideration of additional development within the area as projected by the Comprehensive Plan. No sanitary sewer improvements are required for this development. Stone Drainage: General Provisions: Section 18.810.100.A states requires developers to make adequate provisions for storm water and flood water runoff. Accommodation of Upstream Drainage: Section 18.810.100.0 states that a culvert or other drainage facility shall be large enough to accommodate potential runoff from its entire upstream drainage area, whether inside or outside the development. The City Engineer shall approve the necessary size of the facility, based on the provisions of Design and Construction Standards for Sanitary and Surface Water Management(as adopted by the Unified Sewerage Agency in 2000 and including any future revisions or amendments). There are no upstream drainage ways that impact this development. Effect on Downstream Drainage: Section 18.810.100.D states that where it is anticipated by the City Engineer that the additional runoff resulting from the development will overload an existing drainage facility the Director and Engineer shall withhold approval of the development until provisions have been made for improvement of the potential condition or until provisions have been made for storage of additional runoff caused by the development in accordance with the Design and Construction Standards for Sanitary and Surface Water Management (as adopted by the Unified Sewerage agency in 2000 and including any future revisions or amendments). NOTICE OF TYPE II DECISION SDR2006-00005/TIGARD SKATE PARK PAGE 22 OF 27 In 1997,Clean Water Services (CWS) completed a basin study of Fanno Creek and adopted the Fanno Creek Watershed Management Plan. Section V of that plan includes a recommendation that local governments institute a stormwater detention/effective impervious area reduction program resulting in no net increase in storm peak flows up to the 25-year event. The City will require that all new developments resulting in an increase of impervious surfaces provide onsite detention facilities,unless the development is located adjacent to Fanno Creek. For those developments adjacent to Fanno Creek,the storm water runoff will be permitted to discharge without detention. A drainage study prepared by an Oregon Registered Professional Engineer maybe required by ODOT. The applicant will be required to obtain an ODOT Drainage Permit for connection to the state highway drainage facilities prior to issuance of permits. Utilities: Section 18.810.120 states that all utility lines, but not limited to those required for electric communication, lighting and cable television services and related facilities shall be placed underground, except for surface mounted transformers, surface mounted connection boxes and meter cabinets which may be placed above ground, temporary utility service facilities during construction,high capacity electric lines operating at 50,000 volts or above, and: • The developer shall make all necessary arrangements with the serving utility to provide the underground services; • The City reserves the right to approve location of all surface mounted facilities; • All underground utilities, including sanitary sewers and storm drains installed in streets by the developer,shall be constructed prior to the surfacing of the streets;and • Stubs for service connections shall be long enough to avoid disturbing the street improvements when service connections are made. Exception to Under-Grounding Requirement Section 18.810.120.0 states that a developer shall pay a fee in-lieu of under-grounding costs when the development is proposed to take place on a street where existing utilities which are not underground will serve the development and the approval authority determines that the cost and technical difficulty of under-grounding the utilities outweighs the benefit of under-grounding in conjunction with the development. The determination shall be on a case-by-case basis. The most common, but not the only, such situation is a short frontage development for which under-grounding would result in the placement of additional poles, rather than the removal of above-ground utilities facilities. An applicant for a development which is served by utilities which are not underground and which are located across a public right-of-way from the applicant's property shall pay a tee in-lieu of under-grounding. There are existing overhead utility lines along the frontage of SW Hall Boulevard and SW Burnham Street. If the fee in-lieu is proposed, it is equal to $35.00 per lineal foot of street frontage that contains the overhead lines. It is not clear from the applicant's submittal if they will be providing lighting for this facility. If lighting or other electrical needs are required for this development then the applicant shall pay the fee-in-lieu of under-grounding. ADDITIONAL CITY AND/OR AGENCY CONCERNS WITH STREET AND UTILITY IMPROVEMENT STANDARDS: Storm Water Quality: The City has agreed to enforce Surface Water Management(SWM) regulations established by Clean Water Services (CWS) Design and Construction Standards (adopted by Resolution and Order No. 00-7) which require the construction of on-site water quality facilities. The facilities shall be designed to remove 65 percent of the phosphorus contained in 100 percent of the storm water runoff generated from newly created impervious surfaces. In addition, a maintenance plan shall be submitted indicating the frequency and method to be used in keeping the facility maintained through the year. Prior to issuance of permits, the applicant shall submit plans and calculations for a water quality facility that will meet the intent of the C.WS Design Standards and the ODOT drainage requirements. In addition,the applicant shall submit a maintenance plan for the facility that must be reviewed and approved by the City pnor to construction. An ODOT Drainage Permit is required prior to issuance of City permits. NOTICE OF TYPE II DEQSION SDR2006-00005/TIGARD SKATE PARK PAGE 23 OF 27 The proposed unit from Stormwater Management is acceptable provided the property owner agrees to hire the manufacturer(or approved equal) to provide the required maintenance of the unit. Prior to a final building inspection, the applicant shall demonstrate that they have entered into a maintenance agreement with Stormwater Management, or another company that demonstrates they can meet the maintenance requirements of the manufacturer. Grading and Erosion Control: CWS Design and Construction Standards also regulate erosion control to reduce the amount of sediment and other pollutants reaching the public storm and surface water system resulting from development, construction, grading, excavating, clearing, and any other activity which accelerates erosion. Per CWS regulations, the applicant is required to submit an erosion control plan for City review and approval prior to issuance of City permits. The Federal Clean Water Act requires that a National Pollutant Discharge Elimination System (NPDES) erosion control permit be issued for any development that will disturb one or more acre of land. Since this site is over five acres, the developer will be required to obtain an NPDES permit from the City prior to construction. This permit will be issued along with the site and/or building permit. The erosion control permit will be issued by the Building Department along with the Site permit. Site Permit Required: The applicant is re uired to obtain a Site Permit from the Building Division to cover all on-site private utility installations water, sewer, storm, etc.) and driveway construction. This permit shall be obtained prior to approval of the final plat. E. IMPACT STUDY Section 18.360.090 states, "The Director shall make a fording with respect to each of the following criteria when approving,approving with conditions or denying an application:" Section 18.390.040 states that the applicant shall provide an impact study to quantify the effect of development on public facilities and services. For each public facility system and type of impact, the study shall propose improvements necessary to meet City standard, and to minimize the impact of the development on the public at large, public facilities systems, and affected private property users. In situations where the Community Development Code requires the dedication of real property interests, the applicant shall either specifically concur with a requirement for public right-of-way dedication, or provide evidence that supports that the real property dedication is not roughly proportional to the projected impacts of the development. Section 18.390.040 states that when a condition of approval requires the transfer to the public of an interest in real property, the approval authority shall adopt findings which support the conclusion that the interest in real property to be transferred is roughly proportional to the impact the proposed development will have on the public. The applicant has provided an impact study.addressing the project's impacts on public systems. An existing connection with public storm sewer will be utilized. Runoff from the skate park is no greater than the existing parking lot area. No sanitary sewer or water is required for the project. No street improvements are required based on the expected traffic impact and both Burnham and are improved with sidewalks and street trees. The estimated increase of vehicle trips per day is eighteen (18),which does not constitute a traffic study. The proposed development will increase the inventory of Tigard park land. The Washington County Traffic Impact Fee (TIF) is a mitigation measure that is required at the time of development. Based on a transportation impact study prepared by Mr. David Larson for the A Boy Expansion/Dolan II/Resolution 95-61,TIF's are expected to recapture 32 percent of the traffic impact of new development on the Collector and Arterial Street system. Based on the use, city park,the applicant is required to pay TIF's of approximately$525.00. Final�TIF payment will be assessed at time of building permit submittal. NOTICE OF TYPE II DECISION SDR2006-00005/TIGARD SKATE PARK PAGE 24 OF 27 Based on the estimate that total TIF fees cover 32 percent of the impact on major street improvements citywide,a fee that would cover 100 percent of this projects traffic impact is $1,641 ($525 divided by.32). The difference between the TIF paid: and the full impact is considered the unmitigated impact on the street system. Besides the TIF that mitigates for 32% of the projects impact on the transportation system, the applicant is required to dedicate additional right-of-way along Hall Boulevard and Burnham Street (22 feet x 370 feet = 8,140 square feet along Hall and 17.5 feet x 180 feet = 3,150 square feet along Burnham). The estimated value of the dedication is fifteen dollars a square foot for a total value of$169,350. The streets have adequate pavement widths, and sidewalks, so no street improvements are required with this development. The estimated value of the dedication greatly exceeds the estimated value of the impact, but these are the minimum right-of-way dedications necessary to meet current standards. Estimated Value of Impacts Full Immppact $ 1641.00 Less'liI. Assessment -$ 525.00 Less Mitigated Costs (dedication only -$ 169,350.00 Estimated Difference between Costs and Value of Impacts $ -168,234.00 SECTION VII. OTHER STAFF COMMENTS The City of Tigard Building Division has reviewed the proposal and had no objections. The City of Tigard Engineering Department was sent this proposal for review and the comments have been incorporated into this decision. The City of Tigard Police Department has reviewed this application and had the following concerns: ♦ It has been mentioned numerous times,in multiple communications,inferring that the skate park's close proximity to the Tigard Police Department is desirable in ways of providing a "built-nn" security component. It serves to mention that typically officers are not inside the building, but rather in the field servicing the calls for assistance or patrolling within the community. If the notion that police are always available at the "station" to remedy a situation at the skate park; that assumption would likely be incorrect. The facility will need to be "policed" on its own with respect to the enforcement of park rules." The police will be available through typical and conventional methods such as being dispatched through the regional communications center.If a situation arises at the skate park that warrants police assistance,the complainant may use a telephone located in the police lobby if no other means is available. The lobby is open to the public from lam until.11pm daily. However,the expectation that an officer is immediately available inside the building at any given time is untrue.Police will be dispatched as available and according to priority. • Concerns have also been expressed regarding the availability of parking at Tigard City Hall. Specifically on days when Municipal Court has an abundant case load, parking may be scarce. The availability of parking for the public and employees is a concern. • In addition, specifically police employees have concerns regarding the security of their personal vehicles parked at City Hall.It would not be unreasonable to surmise that Tigard Police Officers may have in the past, or possibly in the future, encounter certain users of the skate park This is not to assume that users of the spate park are "all" problematic; on the contrary, the majority of the skate park users are respectable, upstanding members of the community However, there are isolated incidents that may require police contact with respect to users of the skate park For officers involved, there are concerns about retaliation,primarily in the form of vandalism to their vehicles. Understandably, users of the skate park will have ample opportunity to visually observe officers arriving and departing for work in the parking areas located adjacent to the skate park • In 2006 an ordinance was created in Tigard that limited consumption of alcoholic beverages in certain Tigard parks. Fanno Creek Park, which is adjacent to the property at Tigard City Hall and nearby the location for the planned Tigard Skate Park, should also be nncludec in the area prohibiting alcohol. The ordinance was created as a vehicle to help manage the escalating issues of transients using the parks to consume alcohol, which created safety and environmental concerns voiced by citizens who used the parks as well. Evidence of litter, human waste, urinating in public and other illicit activities appeared to be aggravated by the permitting of alcohol consumption in Tigard parks. NOTICE OF TYPE II DECISION SDR2006-00005/TIGARD SKATE PARK PAGE 25 OF 27 It is important to make clear whether the Tigard Skate Park is included in this parameter. The Police Department would support that the skate park be included in the alcohol ban. It is likely that most users of the skate park will be juveniles, and by-law underage for consuming alcohol. However, there may be opportunity or visitors to the skate park to be of regal drinking age. The co-mingling of these two distinct age groups can present problems related to alcohol. Clear defining rules need to be established. SECTION VIII. AGENCY COMMENTS Tualatin Valley Fire and Rescue (TVF&R) has reviewed the proposal and has no concerns insofar as fire apparatus access or firefighting water supplies is concerned. OREGON DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION was sent a copy of the proposal and recommended the following comments: The site is adjacent to the referenced state highway. ODOT has permitting_authority for the state highway and an interest in ensuring that the proposed land use is compatible with its safe and efficient operation. Please direct the applicant to the District Contact indicated below to determine permit requirements and obtain application information. (District 2A Contact: Sam Hunaidi at 503-229-5002) ODOT RECOMMENDED LOCAL CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL: • Right of way dedication as necessary to accommodate the planned cross section identified in the local Transportation System Plan shall be provided through deed to the Oregon Department of Transportation. The dedication must loe to the State of Oregon, Oregon Department of Transportation. The ODOT District contact will assist in coordinating the dedication. ODOT should provide verification to the local jurisdiction that the dedication requirement has been fulfilled. The property owner must be the signatory for the dedication and will be responsible for a certified environmental assessment of the site prior to transfer of property to the Department. ♦ An ODOT Miscellaneous Permit must be obtained for all work in the highway right of way. ♦ An ODOT Drainage Permit is required for connection to state highway drainage facilities. Connection will only be considered if the sites drainage naturally enters ODOT right of way. The applicant must provide ODOT District with a preliminary drainage plan showing impacts to the highway right of way. A drainage study prepared by an Oregon Registered Professional Engineer is usually required by ODOT it: 1.Total peak runoff entering the highway right of way is greater than 1.77 cubic feet per second; or 2. The improvements create an increase of the impervious surface area greater than 10,758 square feet. PORTLAND GENERAL ELECTRIC reviewed the plans and had concerns that the skate park was possibly being placed above underground power lines and equipment. Locates were performed for the site, but no_Ines were found within the project area. SECTION IX. PROCEDURE AND APPEAL INFORMATION Notice: Notice was posted at City-Hall and mailed to: X The applicant and owners X Owner of record within the required distance X Affected government agencies Final Decision: THIS DECISION IS FINAL ON MARCH 1,2007 AND BECOMES EFFECTIVE ON MARCH 16,2007 UNLESS AN APPEAL IS FILED. NOTICE OF TYPE II DECISION SDR2006-00005/TIGARD SKATE PARK PAGE 26 OF 27 • & eal The decision of the Director (Type II Procedure) or Review Authority (Type II Administrative Appeal or Type III Procedure) is final for purposes of appeal on the date that it Is mailed. Anyparty with standing as provided in Section 18.390.040.G.1. may appeal this decision in accordance with Section 18.390.040.G.2. of the Tigard Community Development Code which provides that a written appeal together with the required fee shall be filed with the Director within ten (10)business days of the date the notice of the decision was mailed. The appeal fee schedule and forms are available from the Planning Division of Tigard City Hall, 13125 SW Hall-B nni oulevard,Tigard,Oregon 97223. Unless the applicant is the appellant,the hearing on an appeal from the Director's Decision shall be confined to the specific issues identified in the written comments submitted by the parties during the comment period. Additional evidence concerning issues properly raised in the Notice of Appeal may be submitted by any party during the appeal hearing,subject to any additional rules of procedure that may be adopted from time to time by the appellate body. THE DEADLINE FOR FILING AN APPEAL IS AT 5:00 PM ON MARCH 15,2007. estions: Ie any questions, please call the City of Tigard Planning Division, Tigard City Hall, 13125 SW Hall Boulevard,Tigard,Oregon at (503) 639-4171. a . March 1,2007 PREPARE BY: Cheryl Gaines DATE Assistant Planner c\curpin\cheryl\sdr\SDR2006-00005.decision NOTICE OF TYPE II DECISION SDR2006-00005/TIGARD SKATE PARK PAGE 27 OF 27 • '�\� ri ,� , CITY of TIGARD. �Il�iiiii� GEOGRAPHIC INFORMATION SYSTEM*Pcip„.5,704(>0.O ti 2/e� . R VICINITY MAP AP 11111 . .rP SDR2006 00005 ` , • P I� G K DD SKATE .7 #4#, . 1*' o + ^J LEGEND: • , _ - = Subject Site • I .1 YI ` 1 •� � ____..."2.111111.1111111111mir— \ . . ,,,,,4_ ,.,,,rm.:1 ,...c., •�\ — - - - BEEF 9EMp)� _UV., �•/ 41'll� 1 _ Tigard Area Map ..„./. .•:SO i� '` L. I : : • 10 „. �_ ,, , ill% . . . ....:. ... ...,... re TIGARD „.:,.. D'MARA Information on this map is for general location only and I Should be verified with the Development Services Divisgn. 13125 SW Hall Blvd �_ Tigard,OR 97223 .• .._ (503)639-4171 �" http7lwvw.ci.tigard.or.us 's r Community Development Plot date:Jan 29,2007;C:\magic\MAGIC03.APR I ` IR-5/8 YPC ,R-5/8 1 1■ _ 1ST 1' ��,G wed I I\r,.S , ::>..4.,, . e�»:r:.i,` J -- ------ ----- SKATEPARK ELEVATIONS a.o,..o.ew yy 1_.;17'- ',II SW BURNHAM STREET --�.` 0099909„ p1 i 4 .I3 " 08 AR' __� —f 5 99 I f !-�IT1 r17T 1 I I-i ` 0• t i rrr,,,TTTrrr _ �n Niche /Skotepork Lot - 31 Spaces \ �,\ -y -Y - • -- N�., @e er _. E 1 ! N.� Q III' IX l MR( - '- i W U ,1 III t I • `•��_ • C R \ nl I I ri'I I i IL n•1. .. ar._ 1 i C �' �� 'pGil 4�,`�t"�� 1♦� 1♦■ 'aJLII,tiJI.' I..1 0 e f ' ~ I ( CITY a I �} t18,-.V9-1149-.'1.15.d.1.w.w i...,4.1.‘11•401:1,11 HALL 0. T. ` L .• J } ] ,] aa1i°�' ANNEX �Ic 4...::::....` w WEST FACING ELEVATION N ' ,'X.t� i ..w 1: .., cn`1-s •'p� I (NICHE) \ © 1 sww 1-+20 .IOroidag8°CRalcurdtions- 'i-------_ ,l R e_� e _ l } --.,1--I i ITT ITT] 1-1 l 1 T1 [H 1=-=' IT111 —NTtil ': w ..nl 1 . City'Hall North Lot - 63 Spaces4� TJ .n.. a _ -= -+23 Irt' 111111.1- C / 3 TEOPARK�I -_ =t I...f>I oa.....1 .......�..1 C wy,1 1 Lwr fw SOUTH FACING ELEVATION• j Police North Lot - 82 Spaces �f I 1 -_ I :!.::•:•:::.: .�9 1N i 1 xrr 1•-20'MON .. War., "_ '0. ,..�r� '714-7: . I' .r, F �- T '� u. i[on is.. . 00 «. ml�l li MI MI I f Ir VIM�IIIIIIII i,l II li it II I '..N� II I r'Ilpi I�CIIII W i • L.I_I__Ll_.l_I 1.1J�.L= Ciii_1 I I k�J_�—� • •�""' r ::•- . $ Ed Ed EAST FACING ELEVATION + (I) o ® r ! [� z �•'-t_° .;; i pills Jn n l Iio .din 1 41 I 7 ilifil II -lines' �F or t3 r1�Y vl __ _� _ _ir__ ♦� / f .i.f.1��a11�t „ 7�e.1a�t T■�r 1•�' LL IA �c� POLICE ;=i- �..__.�1TT1-1-11111-11-11-1�1�t- ! I NORTH FACING ELEVATION t 2a v t N Q f(- ;l 1 - • ' I-03rn 0 ` City Hall South Lot - 33 Spaces - .y 1::s.l/�.,` LEGEND I SITE AREA �^ I I I Li..--L-3,0_ . -1__l_A.. -0 ll. .�. Ed.u,9 Tr..lu Rrnaln Told Silo Arw 9.e. 420.630 1002 SITE PLAN �. Li } ,OL ® ® m 0 Ss.E,i.lhp CanNNan.Pim fr Landscape Area 2.66 121.362 29% ELEVATIONS �ah O * II 0 51.and Spocin lmperNau.r.. 6.96 304.049 715 J E.Ylinp Tres La M w RnsvN n . - .... 1 O Propand Parking Lot 11.. /��� CITY HALL I! 0•o CITY HALL -}y 4 Gbtlnq LIpNI Polo a/W.r 1 ♦ n.n.Oast.00 •. �` 1 � Pt0ppnd Parking Lot Landscaping �� a.w 0A " rl��_�" I C/V Cwpod!Wn9ed pa: '°gPmcs \ W 11111.1111.11 lea.N/C NandcW prW^6.SPea.. I Compwl Parking Spans • _ _,------ rrii. '�' 11 VICINm 64V L • I Ili c •SKATEPARK SITE PLAN ; 1 • SCALE: I" = 30' 1 TIGARD SKATE PARK DESIGN TOTALPARKAREA_13111050. I SKATE Si1RPACE AND SEC VALL APPEOX 3LAIiDSCANT(3 ADDrnONAL SITE SETS AS HIGHLKBOPD ON P ARKING LOT LAYOUT PLAN ' I 1v�a� PARK INCLUDES 2 BOWLS AND AN EXTENSIVE STREET COURSE I RED � p / or O e e o� 7T ALL i ELEVATIONS GIVEN ARE• IN TIIo r, : PLANNING/E 'NEEAING Q °� CONCRETE MM.,4000 PSI -2' SLUMP 'REBAR @ I'ON CENTER ACROSS 0° °' O O g ° ° o •° _ -3/4 C3W141llD SOCK CORRACTED TO ° ° ° -TO M Q O 20 YAKS POUR PP DAY I O 0 / -1/C SAW CLOS 1 DEEP EVERY Wit 0 7.4; /HANDRAIL ACT ASA GROOVE CUT ° _ ° • I° �/ O BABC o j O O o (OP OUT BANK) 1rc Lil O ° fa ii 0 :// I I I Q o w ° O O r SCR 40 PPIDUD. Qi o oQo I L/�� . o 0 o W ° °° / �� \� Q •° • LEGEND:1/////�: - BOUNDARY a O O DOLMAS rervinn % / I d `` 70P or BANK OR BOWL p, RAILS �/ O - BPRON Or TWNEPTION zo ° Q \ e /�r) R'NIP BAN[on TRANSITION F 1---, NANDRAILS- DETAIL A • O• ®Piill Firms LANDSCAPING La x •. / ° e0 ° I DRAMS �=►Ati fr s • O °. F • • ° I �L®O� ° ° . DESIGN AND CONSTRUCTION BY: convex Q \ //17. I DREAMLAND SKATEPARKS LDC j lo ° ° MASE A.SCO01 THESE AREAS ARE LWOW TO SRANSTION I® %0 SE EtWY.101 I ° O ° LINCOLN CITY.OREGON �\// /1 I ° ° I 9736? I7//// AP I /I I/ \ • I I • ° ��PIPE I I j� / I / u fo Lit / I I orJU-f,w ,DATE: 7/02/06 I �� DRAWN BY: ERR /18723 i l Al I /L - - - I l SHEET NO. .FT 1�•_ 3 OF 3 I i NOTICE OF TYPE II DECISION • SITE DEVELOPMENT REVIEW(SDR) 2006-00005 : ` +. TIGARD SKATE PARK 414.1 cju 120 DAYS •• SECTION I. APPLICATION SUMMARY FILE NAME: TIGARD SKATE PARK CASE NO.: Site Development Review(SDR) SDR2006-00005 PROPOSAL: The applicant is requesting approval to construct a 15,000 square-foot skate park on the City Hall site. The site consists of three parcels that total 9.84 acres. APPLICANT/ City of Tigard APPLICANT'S Winterbrook Planning OWNER: Parks Department REP.: Attn: Ben Schonberger Attn: Dan Plaza 310 SW 4t Ave., Suite 1100 13125 SW Hall Blvd. Portland, OR 97204 Tigard,OR 97223 LOCATION: 13125 SW Hall Blvd., Washington County Tax Map 2S 102DA,Tax Lot 400. ZONE: CBD: Central Business District. The CBD zoning district is designed to provide a concentrated central business district, centered on the City's historic downtown, including a mix of civic, retail and office uses. Single-family attached housing, at a maximum density of 12 units/net acre, equivalent of the R-12 zoning district, and multi-family housing at a minimum density of 32 units/acre, equivalent to the R-40 zoning district, are permitted outright. A wide range of uses, including but not limited to adult entertainment, utilities, facilities with drive-up windows, medical centers,major event entertainment and gasoline stations, are permitted conditionally. APPLICABLE RE VIE W CRITERIA: Community Development Code Chapters 18.360, 18.390, 18.520, 18.705, 18.725, 18.745, 18.755, 18.765, 18.780, 18.790, 18.795 and 18.810. SECTION II. DECISION Notice is hereby given that the City of Tigard Community Development Director's designee has APPROVED the above request. The findings and conclusions on which the decision is based are noted in the full decision, available at City Hall. THIS APPROVAL SHALL BE VALID FOR 18 MONTHS FROM THE EFFECTIVE DATE OF THIS DECISION. All documents and applicable criteria in the above-noted file are available for inspection at no cost or copies can be obtained for twenty five cents (25 ) per page,or the current rate charged for copies at the time of the request. SECTION III. PROCEDURE AND APPEAL INFORMATION Notice: Notice mailed to: X The applicant and owners X Owner of record within the required distance X Affected government agencies Final Decision: THIS DECISION IS FINAL ON MARCH 1, 2007 AND BECOMES EFFECTIVE ON MARCH 16, 2007 UNLESS AN APPEAL IS FILED. Appeal: - The Director's Decision is final on the date that it is mailed. All persons entitled to notice or who are otherwise adversely affected or aggrieved by the decision as_provided in Section 18.390.040.G.1 may appeal this decision in accordance with Section 18.390.040.G.2 of the Tigard Community Development Code which provides that a written appeal together with the required fee shall be filed with the Director within ten (10) business days of the date the Notice of Decision was mailed. The appeal fee schedule and forms are available from the Planning Division of Tigard City Hall, 13125 SW Hall Boulevard,Tigard, Oregon 97223. Unless the applicant is the appellant,the hearing on an appeal from the Director's Decision shall be confined to the specific issues identified in the written comments submitted by the parties during the comment period. Additional evidence concerning issues properly raised in the Notice of Appeal may be submitted by any party during the appeal hearing,subject to any additional rules of procedure that maybe adopted from time to time by the appellate body. b THE DEADLINE FOR FILING AN APPEAL IS 5:00 PM ON MARCH 15, 2007. I stions: For information_please contact the Planning Division Staff Planner, Cheryl Caines at (503) 639-4171, Tigard City Hall, 13125 SW Hall Boulevard,Tigard, Oregon 97223. 17:0/ • I VICINITY MAP 00#8,, .�• V`,r`' 44• SDR2006.00005 a=c.asa oar 4. • TIGARD SKATE LEGEND: /9' , Subject Site e4ti - .1,:-. 9 .4,44 tow a'' It f' 111 # V *St az NIL dullitliet'r. -11 ■ g1" a Me IN H i al *44 ----2__ ......._.......r...... TIGARD SKATE PARK DESIGN F,�R ..M REC; to:p.— o • I , . 1 r; Iia' 7,Wa I . . ® - AUG CITY OF 16AA. -/• °•a 11. $1 ^ rrrl I I I I r \ PLANNING/E .INEF• r O •\ • .O _ jl I...:i........-a.se._ ��A 0° g o O Oar °°° . ° .° ® .m,m. J,rrlir nnnrrrrR• . ( oily o° °°// i O a_ ? IIIIIAIIIIFC °° ' ' •°I -a- 1 1=.2= I I I C a°° -� ° i — --� °° Gi • 1111114 hli1N� Y • ° h � ° r O.•I amp: 1..LLLLI a 1 1 J.a`=:- c: s °°a/ . . '%�__ i• — r...:= •O ; • +t,w%.. . .. • Vrrrrrrfir[1-n1 ' - / .°i "" / .1.i4:::'"... A- err Mal li arr... I ".".".. .."....nem • /0 . • 1r '�/■ ' m.o..... L---EP SKATARK SITE PLAN A111%' /A .a.. ,•a •■•MEN ■ ■II■ •• • •••••••••• heryl Caines-Re: sk8 parkgarbage cans Page 1 From: Steve Martin To: Cheryl Gaines; Daniel Plaza Date: 2/28/2007 1:23:36 PM Subject: Re: sk8 park garbage cans Cheryl, Dan asked me to get you a picture of the cans we hope to use at the skate park. Attached is a set of pages containing the possible trash cans for the skate park. The cans in image 1 at the top, second from left (32 gal.) in an appropriate color (brown, black, or green are often picked, and there are more images). At this time, I anticipate 2 cans will be sufficient as we empty trash daily. We could add more cans later if they are being filled or there are more gathering areas that might collect trash. I do not anticipate needing the lid as shown in the bottom picture in image 1, but that could also be added later. Steve Steve Martin City of Tigard Parks Supervisor 503-639-4171 ext. 2598 Fax 503-718-2401 steve @tigard-or.gov >>> Daniel Plaza 02/28 12:03 PM >>> please give cheryl c. an example of a picture from a catalog showing a garbage receptable we plan to use and how many Thanks Dan Plaza Parks and Facilities Manager City of Tigard 503 718 2590 daniel @tigard-or.gov • • • ,- ;lir ir•Al. I,• . ,trit ' ''' /MP' WI`-` z Ii L g 4' • ii 1 z lie ..,, rfi Z .__, 0 ii,- ; ri Z • • • •• Infinity Waste Enclosures . Infinity 55,32,20 and 10 gallon Waste Enclosures shown in grecn(t11?, ■ down tan(03)and black(02)Everlasting LurnbcrTM. Dome Top $7200 . ----...........___ Infinity 1,.. , Waste Enclosures 1 • Everlasting LumberTM - Strongest grade of recycled plastic available! • Infinity Ring Construction - Rust-free ring holds slats firmly in place! • leak & IronWoodsTM - Select models available in real hardwoods! • Rust-Free Hardware - Durable construction for any climate! • Manly Colors - Everlasting LumberTM slats available in a wide variety of colors! I wwwgreatlakesspecialty.com ;:' 1-800-505-7926 NOTICE.TO MORTGAGEE,LIENHOLDER,VENDOR OR SELLER: THE TIGARD DEVELOPMENT CODE REQUIRES THAT IF YOU RECEIVE THIS NOTICE,IT SHALL BE PROMPTLY FORWARDED TO THE PURCHASER NOTICE OF PENDING LAND USE APPLICATION SITE DEVELOPMENT REVIEW TIGARD DATE OF NOTICE: January 30,2007 FILE NUMBER SITE DEVELOPMENT REVIEW(SDR) 2006-00005 (Type II Land Use Application) FILE NAME: TIGARD SKATE PARK REQUEST: The applicant is requesting.approval to construct a 15,000 square-foot skate park on the City Hall site. The site consists of three parcels that total 9.84 acres. LOCATION: 13125 SW Hall Boulevard,Washington County Tax Map 2S102DA,Tax Lot 400 and 401; and 8720 SW Burnham Street;Washington County Tax Map 2S102DA,Tax Lot 200. ZONE: CBD: Central Business District. The CBD zoning district is designed to provide a concentrated central business district, centered on the City's historic downtown, including a mix of civic, retail and office uses. Single-family attached housing, at a maximum density of 12 units/net acre, equivalent of the R-12 zoning district, and multi-family housing at a minimum density of 32 units/acre, equivalent to the R-40 zoning district, are permitted outright. A wide range of uses, including but not limited to adult entertainment, utilities, facilities with drive-up windows, medical centers,major event entertainment and gasoline stations,are permitted conditionally. APPLICABLE REVIEW CRITERIA: Community Development Code Chapters 18360, 18.390, 18.520, 18.705, 18.725, 18.745, 18.755, 18.765, 18.780, 18.790, 18.795 and 18.810. YOUR RIGHT TO PROVIDE WRITTEN COMMENTS: Prior to the City making any decision on the Application,you are hereby provided a fourteen(14) day period to submit written comments on the application to the City. THE FOURTEEN (14) DAY PERIOD ENDS AT 5:00 PM ON FEBRUARY 13, 2007. All comments should be directed to Cheryl Gaines, Assistant Planner in the Planning Division at the City of Tigard, 13125 SW Hall Boulevard, Tigard, Oregon 97223. You may reach the City of Tigard by telephone at 503.639.4171 x2434 or bye-mail to Cheryk@tigard-or.gov. ALL COMMENTS MUST BE RECEIVED BY THE CITY OF TIGARD IN WRITING PRIOR TO 5:00 PM ON THE DATE SPECIFIED ABOVE IN ORDER FOR YOUR COMMENTS TO BE CONSIDERED IN THE DECISION MAKING PROCESS THE CITY OF TIGARD APPRECIATES RECEIVING COMMENTS AND VALUES YOUR INPUT. COMMENTS WILL BE CONSIDERED AND ADDRESSED WITHIN THE NOTICE OF DECISION. A DECISION ON THIS ISSUE IS TENTATIVELY SCHEDULED FOR MARCH 1, 2007. IF YOU PROVIDE COMMENTS, YOU WILL BE SENT A COPY OF THE FULL DECISION ONCE IT HAS BEEN RENDERED. WRI"fIEN COMMENTS WILL BECOME A PART OF THE PERMANENT PUBLIC RECORD AND SHALL CONTAIN THE FOLLOWING INFORMATION: • Address the specific"Applicable Review Criteria" described in the section above or any other criteria believed to be applicable to this proposal; • Raise any issues and/or concerns believed to be important with sufficient evidence to allow the City to provide a response; • Comments that provide the basis for an appeal to the Tigard Hearings Officer must address the relevant approval criteria with sufficient specificity on that issue. Failure of any party to address the relevant approval criteria with sufficient specificity may preclude subsequent appeals to the Land Use Board of Appeals or Circuit Court on that issue. Specific findings directed at the relevant approval criteria are what constitute relevant evidence. AN 1ER THE 14 DAY COMMENT PERIOD CLOSES,THE DIRECTOR SHALL ISSUE A TYPE II ADMINISTRATIVE DECISION. THE DIRECTOR'S DECISION SHALL BE MAILED TO THE APPLICANT AND TO OWNERS OF RECORD OF PROPERTY LOCATED WITHIN 500 FEET OF THE SUBJECT SITE, AND TO ANYONE ELSE WHO SUBMITTED WRITTEN COMMENTS OR WHO IS OTHERWISE ENTITLED TO NOTICE. THE DIRECTOR'S DECISION SHALL ADDRESS ALL OF THE RELEVANT APPROVAL CRITERIA. BASED UPON THE CRITERIA AND THE FAC15 CONTAINED WITHIN THE RECORD, THE DIRECTOR SHALL APPROVE,APPROVE WITH CONDITIONS OR DENY THE REQUESTED PERMIT OR ACTION. SUMMARY OF THE DECISION-MAKING PROCESS: • The application is accepted by the City • Notice is sent to property owners of record within 500 feet of the proposed development area allowing a 14-day written comment period. • The application is reviewed by City Staff and affected agencies. • City Staff issues a written decision. • Notice of the decision is sent to the Applicant and all owners or contract purchasers of record of the site; all owners of record of property located within 500 feet of the site,as shown on the most recent property tax assessment roll;any City-recognized neighborhood group whose boundaries include the site; and any governmental agency which is entitled to notice under an intergovernmental agreement entered into with the City which includes provision for such notice or anyone who is otherwise entitled to such notice. INFORMATION/EVIDENCE AVAILABLE FOR REVIEW: The application,written comments and supporting documents relied upon by the Director to make this decision are contained within the record and are available for public review at the City of Tigard Community Development Department. If you want to inspect the file, please call and make an appointment with either the project planner or the planning technicians. Copies of these items may be obtained at a cost of $.25 per page or the current rate charged for this service. Questions regarding this application should be directed to the Planning Staff indicated on the first page of this Notice under the section titled "Your Right to Provide Written Comments." VICINITI MAP ■•♦ty ,`` • SDR2000-00005 . TIGARD SKATE ♦ $ • PARK LEGEND: Subject Site lireSIP'. 111111111W mil wpm mu. um I4"11,11211 r. Am nut elm Vim IP (11V41: g m „ raN Tic: ian 1111111111111E11 mu no ma ow • mN. .. t •a..e: n - REQUEST FOR COMMENTS CleanWater Services """ "`" I " RECEIVED PLANNING FEB 2 1 2007 MEMORANDUM CITY OF TIGARD DATE: February 12, 2007 FROM: Bill Baechler, Clean Water S ices TO: Emily Eng, City of Tiga `'1 SUBJECT: Review Comments— SDR 2006-00005 GENERAL COMMENTS • This Land Use Review by Clean Water Services (District) does not constitute approval of storm or sanitary sewer compliance with the NPDES permit held by the District. The District, prior to issuance of any connection permit, must review and approve final construction plans. • All provisions of the development submittal shall be in accordance with Clean Water Services (CWS) Design and Construction Standards, presently Resolution and Order No. 04- 09 (R&O 04-09), the Erosion Prevention and Sediment Control Manual, December 2000 edition, and all current Intergovernmental Agreements between the City and CWS. • Final construction plans must be reviewed by CWS for conformance with R&O 04-9 (current version) and a Stormwater Connection Permit issued by the District prior to construction. SANITARY SEWER • No sanitary facilities proposed with this project. STORM DRAINAGE AND WATER QUALITY • The facility shall be provided with an individual connection to a public storm conveyance. • A hydraulic and hydrological analysis of the existing storm conveyance system in accordance with R&O 04-9 is required. A downstream conveyance analysis is required. The applicant is responsible for mitigating downstream storm conveyance if the existing system does not have the capacity to convey the runoff volume from a 25-year, 24-hour storm event. • The Developer shall provide a water quality facility to treat all impervious surfaces being constructed or preserved as part of this development. SENSITIVE AREA 2550 SW Hillsboro Highway• Hillsboro, Oregon 97123 Phone: (503)681-3600• Fax:(503)681-3603•www.CleanWaterServices.org • Sensitive areas do not appear to exist on the site or within 200' of the site. The Pre-screening Site Assessment dated August 15, 2006, CWS File Number 06-002597, serves as the Service Provider letter for this project. EROSION CONTROL • As the improvements are impacting less than 1-acre, no 1200-C Permit is required. Provide erosion control in accordance with the current CWS design and construction standards. Patty Lunsford- Request for Comments For Tigard Skate Park Page 1 From: Patty Lunsford To: Marah Danielson; Sam Hunaidia Date: Wednesday, February 21, 2007 10:05:46 AM Subject: Request for Comments Fat Tigai SkatePark Dear Marah and Sam: I first must apologize for the very short time line that I am requesting that you to comment on this project the City is undertaking. I intended to send this to you last week but became ill so this is even later than late! I hope that the two of you can review the attached information and respond to the City at your very earliest convenience with comments. Please send your comments to Cheryl Caines at cherylc @tigard-or.gov and copy Kim McMillan at kimna tigard-or.gov. Again, I apologize for the short notice and hope that you will be able to respond with any comments soon. Sincerely, Patricia Lunsford, Planning Secretary City of Tigard, Oregon 13125 SW Hall Boulevard Tigard, OR 97223 503.639.4171, ext. 2438 patty @tigard-or.gov CC: Cheryl Caines; Kim Mcmillan MEMORANDUM CITY OF TIGARD, OREGON DATE: 2/28/07 TO: Cheryl Gaines, Assistant Planner FROM: Kim McMillan, Development Review Enginee RE: SDR2006-00005 Skate Park f Access Management (Section 18.705.030.H) Section 18.705.030.H.1 states that an access report shall be submitted with all new development proposals which verifies design of driveways and streets are safe by meeting adequate stacking needs, sight distance and deceleration standards as set by ODOT, Washington County, the City and AASHTO. Lancaster Engineering has provided preliminary intersection sight distance measurements in a memo to the applicant, dated October 2, 2006. The sight distance was measured at the two existing driveways that serve the site. The driveway on Burnham Street requires a minimum sight distance of 335 feet, based on a posted speed of 30 mph. The engineer states that the available sight distance to the west is unrestricted and the required minimum of 335 feet of sight distance is available. To the east the signalized intersection of Burnham Street and hall Boulevard is clearly visible. Burnham Street terminates at its Hall Boulevard with a T-intersection. The posted speed on Hall Boulevard north of the driveway on Hall Boulevard is 30 mph while the speed zone transitions to 40 mph immediately south of the driveway location. The engineer states that the sight distance to the south meets the minimum required 445 feet of sight distance. To the north the line of sight is restricted by vegetation and street trees on the inside of the horizontal curve of Hall Boulevard. Intersection sight distance was measured to be approximately 280 feet which does not meet the requirements for intersection sight distance. The engineer points out that when intersection sight distance is not available stopping sight distance is commonly examined. Stopping sight distance is considered the minimum measure for safe operation, since it is the minimum distance necessary for an oncoming driver to see an object in the travel lane and come to a complete stop if necessary to avoid a collision. For southbound traffic on Hall Boulevard approaching the main City Hall driveway, the stopping sight distance requirement is 200 feet based on the posted speed of 30 mph. Due to the horizontal curve and proximity of the traffic signal, actual travel speeds may ENGINEERING COMMENTS SDR2006-00005 SKATE PARK PAGE 1 be reduced somewhat, which would reduce the sight distance needed at the driveway. The engineer recommends that given the limited sight distance to the north from the main City Hall driveway, one option for traffic circulation would be to encourage the use of the Burnham Street access for skate park traffic. By providing this second access to serve traffic from the skate park additional traffic on the main City Hall access can be minimized. Prior to issuance of permits, the applicant's engineer shall submit additional information regarding sight distance from the main City Hall driveway and how the sight distance will be improved with the trimming or removal of vegetation and street trees on the inside of the horizontal curve of Hall Boulevard. It is not typical to approve stopping sight distance in-lieu of intersection sight distance when there are measures that can be taken to improve intersection sight distance. Intersection sight distance must be maximized and then stopping sight distance may be considered. The recommended trimming or removal of vegetation and trees will be required by the applicant prior to final inspection. Prior to issuance of permits, the applicant shall submit a traffic circulation and signage plan that encourages skate park traffic to use the Burnham Street access. This plan shall be submitted to the Engineering Department for review and approval. Prior to final inspection the applicant's engineer shall submit final sight distance certification for both driveways. Section 18.705.030.H.2 states that driveways shall not be permitted to be placed in the influence area of collector or arterial street intersections. Influence area of intersections is that area where queues of traffic commonly form on approach to an intersection. The minimum driveway setback from a collector or arterial street intersection shall be150 feet, measured from the right-of-way line of the intersecting street to the throat of the proposed driveway. The setback may be greater depending upon the influence area, as determined from City Engineer review of a traffic impact report submitted by the applicant's traffic engineer. In a case where a project has less than 150 feet of street frontage, the applicant must explore any option for shared access with the adjacent parcel. If shared access is not possible or practical, the driveway shall be placed as far from the intersection as possible. The applicant did not address this section. The access on Burnham Street is only 117 feet from Hall Boulevard and after ROW dedication to ODOT will be 87 feet from the intersection. This clearly falls within the influence area of an arterial street intersection. ENGINEERING COMMENTS SDR2006-00005 SKATE PARK PAGE 2 The frontage along Burnham Street is approximately 165 feet, but will only be 135 feet in length after ROW dedication to ODOT. Therefore, prior to issuance of permits, the applicant must explore any option for a shared access with the adjacent parcel or place the driveway as far from the intersection as possible. Section 18.705.030.H.3 and 4 states that the minimum spacing of driveways and streets along a collector shall be 200 feet. The minimum spacing of driveways and streets along an arterial shall be 600 feet. The minimum spacing of local streets along a local street shall be 125 feet. The driveway on Burnham Street is only 104 feet from the driveway to the west. Burnham Street is a Collector street requiring a minimum 200 feet spacing of driveways and streets. The driveway on Hall Boulevard is closer than 600 feet to several driveways and Burnham Street. Hall Boulevard is an Arterial requiring a minimum 600 feet spacing of driveways and streets. The applicant did not address this section and did not apply for an adjustment to this standard. Prior to issuance of permits the applicant shall apply for and receive approval of an adjustment to the spacing standard in accordance with 18.370. Street And Utility Improvements Standards (Section 18.810): Chapter 18.810 provides construction standards for the implementation of public and private facilities and utilities such as streets, sewers, and drainage. The applicable standards are addressed below: Streets: Improvements: Section 18.810.030.A.1 states that streets within a development and streets adjacent shall be improved in accordance with the TDC standards. Section 18.810.030.A.2 states that any new street or additional street width planned as a portion of an existing street shall be dedicated and improved in accordance with the TDC. Minimum Rights-of-Way and Street Widths: Section 18.810.030.E requires an Arterial street to have a 104 right-of-way width and 72-foot paved section. Other improvements required may include on-street parking, sidewalks and bikeways, underground utilities, street lighting, storm drainage, and street trees. ENGINEERING COMMENTS SDR2006-00005 SKATE PARK PAGE 3 This site lies adjacent to SW Hall Boulevard, which is classified as an Arterial on the City of Tigard Transportation Plan Map. At present, there is approximately 30 feet of ROW from centerline, according to the most recent tax assessor's map. The applicant should dedicate the additional ROW to ODOT to provide 52 feet of ROW from centerline for the entire frontage length of tax lots 2S102DA00400 and 2S102DA00401. Minimum Rights-of-Way and Street Widths: Section 18.810.030.E requires a Collector street to have a 75 right-of-way width and 23-foot paved section. Other improvements required may include on-street parking, sidewalks and bikeways, underground utilities, street lighting, storm drainage, and street trees. This site lies adjacent to SW Burnham Street, which is classified as a Collector on the City of Tigard Transportation Plan Map. At present, there is approximately 20 feet of ROW from centerline, according to the most recent tax assessor's map. The applicant should dedicate the additional ROW to provide 37.5 feet from centerline plus the additional ROW for the radius at the intersection. Block Designs - Section 18.810.040.A states that the length, width and shape of blocks shall be designed with due regard to providing adequate building sites for the use contemplated, consideration of needs for convenient access, circulation, control and safety of street traffic and recognition of limitations and opportunities of topography. Block Sizes: Section 18.810.040.B.1 states that the perimeter of blocks formed by streets shall not exceed 1,800 feet measured along the right-of- way line except: • Where street location is precluded by natural topography, wetlands or other bodies of water or, pre-existing development or; • For blocks adjacent to arterial streets, limited access highways, major collectors or railroads. • For non-residential blocks in which internal public circulation provides equivalent access. PLANNING Section 18.810.040.B.2 also states that bicycle and pedestrian connections on public easements or right-of-ways shall be provided when full street connection is not possible. Spacing between connections shall be no more than 330 feet, except where precluded by environmental or ENGINEERING COMMENTS SDR2006-00005 SKATE PARK PAGE 4 topographical constraints, existing development patterns, or strict adherence to other standards in the code. PLANNING Lots - Size and Shape: Section 18.810.060(A) prohibits lot depth from being more than 2.5 times the average lot width, unless the parcel is less than 1.5 times the minimum lot size of the applicable zoning district. PLANNING Lot Frontage: Section 18.810.060(B) requires that lots have at least 25 feet of frontage on public or private streets, other than an alley. In the case of a land partition, 18.420.050.A.4.c applies, which requires a parcel to either have a minimum 15-foot frontage or a minimum 15-foot wide recorded access easement. In cases where the lot is for an attached single-family dwelling unit, the frontage shall be at least 15 feet. PLANNING Sidewalks: Section 18.810.070.A requires that sidewalks be constructed to meet City design standards and be located on both sides of arterial, collector and local residential streets. Private streets and industrial streets shall have sidewalks on at least one side. There are existing sidewalks along the Hall Boulevard and Burnham Street frontages. The sidewalks are not at their ultimate design location. This development is not required to relocate the sidewalks. Sanitary Sewers: Sewers Required: Section 18.810.090.A requires that sanitary sewer be installed to serve each new development and to connect developments to existing mains in accordance with the provisions set forth in Design and Construction Standards for Sanitary and Surface Water Management (as adopted by Clean Water Services in 1996 and including any future revisions or amendments) and the adopted policies of the comprehensive plan. Over-sizing: Section 18.810.090.0 states that proposed sewer systems shall include consideration of additional development within the area as projected by the Comprehensive Plan. No sanitary sewer improvements are required for this development. ENGINEERING COMMENTS SDR2006-00005 SKATE PARK PAGE 5 Storm Drainage: General Provisions: Section 18.810.100.A requires developers to make adequate provisions for storm water and flood water runoff. Accommodation of Upstream Drainage: Section 18.810.100.0 states that a culvert or other drainage facility shall be large enough to accommodate potential runoff from its entire upstream drainage area, whether inside or outside the development. The City Engineer shall approve the necessary size of the facility, based on the provisions of Design and Construction Standards for Sanitary and Surface Water Management (as adopted by Clean Water Services in 2000 and including any future revisions or amendments). There are no upstream drainage ways that impact this development. Effect on Downstream Drainage: Section 18.810.100.D states that where it is anticipated by the City Engineer that the additional runoff resulting from the development will overload an existing drainage facility, the Director and Engineer shall withhold approval of the development until provisions have been made for improvement of the potential condition or until provisions have been made for storage of additional runoff caused by the development in accordance with the Design and Construction Standards for Sanitary and Surface Water Management (as adopted by Clean Water Services in 2000 and including any future revisions or amendments). In 1997, Clean Water Services (CWS) completed a basin study of Fanno Creek and adopted the Fanno Creek Watershed Management Plan. Section V of that plan includes a recommendation that local governments institute a stormwater detention/effective impervious area reduction program resulting in no net increase in storm peak flows up to the 25-year event. The City will require that all new developments resulting in an increase of impervious surfaces provide onsite detention facilities, unless the development is located adjacent to Fanno Creek. For those developments adjacent to Fanno Creek, the storm water runoff will be permitted to discharge without detention. A drainage study prepared by an Oregon Registered Professional Engineer may be required by ODOT. The applicant will be required to obtain an ODOT Drainage Permit for connection to the state highway drainage facilities prior to issuance of permits. ENGINEERING COMMENTS SDR2006-00005 SKATE PARK PAGE 6 Utilities: Section 18.810.120 states that all utility lines, but not limited to those required for electric, communication, lighting and cable television services and related facilities shall be placed underground, except for surface mounted transformers, surface mounted connection boxes and meter cabinets which may be placed above ground, temporary utility service facilities during construction, high capacity electric lines operating at 50,000 volts or above, and: • The developer shall make all necessary arrangements with the serving utility to provide the underground services; • The City reserves the right to approve location of all surface mounted facilities; • All underground utilities, including sanitary sewers and storm drains installed in streets by the developer, shall be constructed prior to the surfacing of the streets; and • Stubs for service connections shall be long enough to avoid disturbing the street improvements when service connections are made. Exception to Under-Grounding Requirement: Section 18.810.120.0 states that a developer shall pay a fee in-lieu of under-grounding costs when the development is proposed to take place on a street where existing utilities which are not underground will serve the development and the approval authority determines that the cost and technical difficulty of under- grounding the utilities outweighs the benefit of under-grounding in conjunction with the development. The determination shall be on a case- by-case basis. The most common, but not the only, such situation is a short frontage development for which under-grounding would result in the placement of additional poles, rather than the removal of above-ground utilities facilities. An applicant for a development which is served by utilities which are not underground and which are located across a public right-of-way from the applicant's property shall pay a fee in-lieu of under- grounding. There are existing overhead utility lines along the frontage of SW Hall Boulevard and SW Burnham Street. If the fee in-lieu is proposed, it is equal to $ 35.00 per lineal foot of street frontage that contains the overhead lines. It is not clear from the applicant's submittal if they will be providing lighting for this facility. If lighting or other electrical needs are required for this development then the applicant shall pay the fee-in-lieu of under-grounding. ENGINEERING COMMENTS SDR2006-00005 SKATE PARK PAGE 7 Storm Water Quality: The City has agreed to enforce Surface Water Management (SWM) regulations established by Clean Water Services (CWS) Design and Construction Standards (adopted by Resolution and Order No. 00-7) which require the construction of on-site water quality facilities. The facilities shall be designed to remove 65 percent of the phosphorus contained in 100 percent of the storm water runoff generated from newly created impervious surfaces. In addition, a maintenance plan shall be submitted indicating the frequency and method to be used in keeping the facility maintained through the year. Prior to issuance of permits, the applicant shall submit plans and calculations for a water quality facility that will meet the intent of the CWS Design Standards and the ODOT drainage requirements. In addition, the applicant shall submit a maintenance plan for the facility that must be reviewed and approved by the City prior to construction. An ODOT Drainage Permit is required prior to issuance of City permits. The proposed unit from Stormwater Management is acceptable, provided the property owner agrees to hire the manufacturer (or approved equal) to provide the required maintenance of the unit. Prior to a final building inspection, the applicant shall demonstrate that they have entered into a maintenance agreement with Stormwater Management, or another company that demonstrates they can meet the maintenance requirements of the manufacturer. Grading and Erosion Control: CWS Design and Construction Standards also regulate erosion control to reduce the amount of sediment and other pollutants reaching the public storm and surface water system resulting from development, construction, grading, excavating, clearing, and any other activity which accelerates erosion. Per CWS regulations, the applicant is required to submit an erosion control plan for City review and approval prior to issuance of City permits. The erosion control permit will be issued by the Building Department along with the Site permit. Site Permit Required: The applicant is required to obtain a Site Permit from the Building Division to cover all on-site private utility installations (water, sewer, storm, etc.) and driveway construction. This permit shall be obtained prior to approval of the final plat. ENGINEERING COMMENTS SDR2006-00005 SKATE PARK PAGE 8 Recommendations: THE FOLLOWING CONDITIONS SHALL BE SATISFIED PRIOR TO ISSUANCE OF THE SITE PERMIT: Submit to the Engineering Department (Kim McMillan, 639-4171, ext. 2642) for review and approval: A Public Facility Improvement (PFI) permit is required for this project to cover driveway improvements on Burnham Street and any other work in the public right-of-way. Three (3) sets of detailed public improvement plans shall be submitted for review to the Engineering Department. NOTE: these plans are in addition to any drawings required by the Building Division and should only include sheets relevant to public improvements. Public Facility Improvement (PFI) permit plans shall conform to City of Tigard Public Improvement Design Standards, which are available at City Hall and the City's web page (www.tigard-or.gov). The PFI permit plan submittal shall include the exact legal name, address and telephone number of the individual or corporate entity who will be designated as the "Permittee", and who will provide the financial assurance for the public improvements. For example, specify if the entity is a corporation, limited partnership, LLC, etc. Also specify the state within which the entity is incorporated and provide the name of the corporate contact person. Failure to provide accurate information to the Engineering Department will delay processing of project documents. Prior to issuance of permits, the applicant's engineer shall submit additional information regarding sight distance from the main City Hall driveway on Hall Boulevard and show how much sight distance will be improved with the trimming or removal of vegetation and street trees on the inside of the horizontal curve of Hall Boulevard. If the trimming and removal of vegetation improve intersection sight distance the applicant will be required to do so prior to final inspection. Prior to issuance of permits, the applicant shall submit a traffic circulation and signage plan that encourages skate park traffic to use the Burnham Street access. Prior to issuance of permits, the applicant shall explore any option for a shared access on Burnham Street with the adjacent parcel or place the driveway as far from the intersection as possible. ENGINEERING COMMENTS SDR2006-00005 SKATE PARK PAGE 9 Prior to issuance of permits, the applicant shall apply for and receive approval of an adjustment to the spacing standard for the two driveways in accordance with the spacing standard of 18.705.030.H.3 and the variance and adjustment standards of 18.370. The applicant shall provide a construction vehicle access and parking plan for approval by the City Engineer. The purpose of this plan is for parking and traffic control during the public improvement construction phase. The parking and access aisles outside the footprint of the skate park cannot be used for staging or parking by the contractors throughout this project. Prior to issuance of permits, additional right-of-way shall be conveyed to the State of Oregon, by and through its Department of Transportation, Highway Division, along the frontage of Hall Boulevard to increase the right-of-way to 52 feet from centerline. The description shall be tied to the existing right-of- way centerline. Verification that the conveyance has been submitted to the State shall be provided to the City Engineering Department. (For additional information, contact Martin Abero, Oregon Department of Transportation, Right-of-Way Section, 123 NW Flanders, Portland, OR 97209-4037; Phone: 731-8425). Prior to issuance of permits, additional right-of-way shall be dedicated to the Public along the frontage of Burnham Street to increase the right-of-way to 37.5 feet from the centerline. The description shall be tied to the existing right-of-way centerline. The dedication document shall be on City forms. Instructions are available from the Engineering Department. Prior to issuance of permits, the applicant shall obtain an ODOT Miscellaneous Permit from the State of Oregon Highway Division, to perform work within the right-of-way of Hall Boulevard. A copy of the permit shall be provided to the City Engineering Department. Final design plans and calculations for the proposed private water quality facility shall be submitted to the Engineering Department (Kim McMillan) and ODOT for review and approval. Final approval will be part of the ODOT Drainage Permit, which must be issued prior to issuance of any City permits. The applicant is required to contact ODOT to determine if a drainage study is required for connection to the facility in Hall Boulevard. ODOT drainage Permit is required for connection to state highway drainage facilities. ENGINEERING COMMENTS SDR2006-00005 SKATE PARK PAGE 10 • An erosion control plan shall be provided as part of the Site Permit drawings. The plan shall conform to the "Erosion Prevention and Sediment Control Design and Planning Manual, February 2003 edition." THE FOLLOWING CONDITIONS SHALL BE SATISFIED PRIOR TO A FINAL INSPECTION: Submit to the Engineering Department (Kim McMillan, 639-4171, ext. 2642) for review and approval: Prior to a final inspection, the applicant shall complete any work in the public right-of-way and obtain approval from ODOT and the City of Tigard Engineering Department. If the applicant proposes to provide lighting or other electrical services to the skate park they shall pay the fee in-lieu of under grounding. The fee shall be calculated by the frontage of the site that is parallel to the utility lines and will be $ 35.00 per lineal foot. Prior to a final inspection, the applicant shall demonstrate that they have entered into a maintenance agreement with Stormwater Management, or another company that demonstrates they can meet the maintenance requirements of the manufacturer, for the proposed onsite storm water treatment facility. Prior to final inspection, the applicant's engineer shall submit final sight distance certification for both driveways. ENGINEERING COMMENTS SDR2006-00005 SKATE PARK PAGE 11 Cheryl Caines - RE: Skate Park Pa•e 1 From: "Joanne Zimmer" <Joannez @pnwtor.com> To: "Daniel Plaza" <Daniel @tigard-or.gov>, <craigd @tigard-or.gov> Date: 2/22/2007 1:50:30 PM Subject: RE: Skate Park Mayor Dirksen, With my concerns, for the most part, falling on deaf ears, I do not find it surprising that residents of the Bull Mountain area or other unincorporated areas do not want to annex to the City of Tigard. See below Daniel, If the skate park site was chosen for its proximity to the police station, how does the fact that the police station is slated to move down and across Burnham fit into this scenario of oversight by the police department? See today's Oregonian. Again, I would like to see the noise issues addressed higher on the rules list. The consequences of rule violation are rules without teeth if the rules are being broken after everyone at the city offices has gone home for the day or on weekends. With the police station moving further away for the skate park there will be no one there to monitor skate park users after normal business hours. As to traffic and a traffic light at the intersection of Hall & O'Mara, thank you Cheryl for your reply. Would the city be working with the State of Oregon in the development of the downtown area? Would it be possible to get this discussion opened up along with the redevelopment of the downtown? What do I need to do as a taxpayer to be heard? Who do I need to talk to? How did the city manage to get a traffic light installed at Wall Street when the library was built? I find it very frustrating to be dealing with decision makers who do not have to deal with the effects of their decisions once they go home after the days work is done. So far I'm finding that skate parks in other cities are not as close as this one is to my residence. There is a very good reason why the city ran into such negative public input when considering other sites. As to the recent passage of the city ordinance against alcohol in the park, I went through the park this past weekend. There were a number of recent additions to the empty liquor bottles, especially down by the bridge next to A-Boy. If those mointoring the drinking in the park cannot see this residue, I can collect these empty bottles and drop them off. Who would be the individual with authority over this? If you are unaware of the specific person I would be happy to drop off the bottles I collect at the city offices. I too would like to think that skate park users will be courteous and well-mannered. I find it unsettling that the park will go in and then, if the unsupervised users are found not to be courteous and well-mannered, I will be one of those left to simply have to put up with it and the negative impact this will have on my neighborhood and Fanno • Che I Caines - RE: Skate Park Page Creek Park in general. Between those drinking in the park now and the skate park users spilling into the park, I am concerned that it will not be safe to enter and use Fanno Creek Park to the degree that I now use the park. I am not against progress or wish things to remain as they are. The redevelopment of Tigard's downtown is something that I sincerely look forward to. I voted for the urban development. I just don't feel this skate park fits into the picture as neatly as you and some of your peers at the city do. Original Message From: Daniel Plaza [mailto:Daniel @tigard-or.gov] Sent: Tuesday, February 13, 2007 2:58 PM To: Joanne Zimmer Cc: Jim Wolf; Cheryl Caines; Dennis Koellermeier Subject RE: Skate Park Joanne, I am not able to answer all of your inquiries but I will answer those that I can. My responses will be bolded. Thanks Dan Plaza Parks and Facilities Manager City of Tigard 503 718 2590 daniel @tigard-or.gov >» "Joanne Zimmer" <Joannez @pnwtor.com> 02/13 2:36 PM >>> Thank you for responding to our concerns. While you response is appreciated, it has the tone of a decision made by people who have their minds made up and, furthermore, do not live near the proposed skate park. Yes a final site/location decision has been made by the City Council. After looking at several other sites in Tigard the Council decided that this site would be well suited because of the location of the police department and other city buildings very near to the location. I ride a bike myself and assure you that my concern is not noise made by the bicycles or skates themselves, but by those wearing the skates or riding the bikes. In other words, this is a proposal for an outdoor park, is it not? I take exception to the fact that the rules for the proposed skate park list no boom boxes, stereos or radios as the 2nd to the last rule. While rule no. 6 is appreciated, it doesn't sound like those involved with the skate park proposal really take the noise that it could generate very seriously. Again, this is proposed to be very near my house and, if there's nothing that I can do at this point to keep this park from winding up at the proposed site, I would appreciate it if rule no 17 was made rule no. 3, or at the very lease rule no. 4. I'm keeping in Cheryl Caines-RE: Skate Park Pa.e 3 mind your own rule no 18, this skate park is not supervised. The rules are listed by those pertaining to safety first. The ban on alcohol in the park is certainly a positive step and I look forward to seeing some positive results from same. No one has addressed our traffic concerns. We were duped once by the library (yes, we attended meetings) and it appears we're about to be duped once again by those behind the skate park. It's time to put a traffic light at O'Mara and Hall so that we can better get in and out of our subdivision. The City's Community Development Department can address traffic concerns. Who are these other cities and who may I contact to get first hand input on cities with skate parks? Cities in Oregon with skate parks http://www.skateoregon.com Adams Albany Ashland Astoria Athena Aumsville Bandon Beaverton Bend Brookings Burns Burnside Canby Cannon Beach Carleton Cave Junction Central Point Clatskanie Coos Bay Corbett Corvallis Cottage Grove Creswell Dallas Dee Depoe Bay Donald Enterprise Eugene Florence Forest Grove Gold Beach Grants Pass Gresham Hillsboro Cheryl Caines- RE: Skate Park Pa.e 4 Hermiston Hines Hood River Hubbard Independence Jacksonville Keizer Klamath Falls Kuna La Grande Lake Oswego Lincoln City Madras McMinnville Medford Milton-Freewater Molalla Monmouth Mosier Myrtle Point Nehalem Newberg Newport Oak Ridge Ontario Oregon City Pendleton Philomath Portland Port Orford Prineville Ranier Redmond Reedsport Roseburg Salem Sandy Scappoose Seaside Sheridan Siletz If the skate park goes in at the proposed site, who may we contact if there are problems?As a matter of fact, I would like the skate park rules to post a phone number for a contact person. Is this in the plans? Good idea, a contact name will be placed on the rules sign, it will be Steve Martin, 503 718 2598 or e-mail Steve @tigard-or.gov The skate park rules you attached do not advise a violator what the consequences are. What are they and who will enforce them? The consequences will range from verbal warnings to written warnings to possible ejection from the skate park for a day or more depending on the violation(s). 'Cheryl Caines-RE: Skate Park Pa•e 5 Thank you for your time. Original Message From: Daniel Plaza [mailto:Daniel @tigard-or.gov] Sent: Monday, February 12, 2007 11:41 AM To Joanne Zimmer Cc: Jim Wolf: Cheryl Caines: Dennis Koellermeier Subject: Fwd: Skate Park Dear Ms. Zimmer: Cheryl Caines, Assistant Planner for the City of Tigard, has asked me to respond to items set forth in your email dated 2/6/07. I feel that I can respond to a couple of your issues. The noise levels generated at skate parks by skate boards, in-line skates, and bicycles are minimal. Further, the skate park is approximately a quarter (1/4) of a mile from your house, and any noise generated by the skate park will be significantly reduced by distance and by City Hall buildings. It is very probable that you will not hear any sounds from the skate park. Boom boxes, stereos, and radios. etc. will not be allowed at the skate park. Other cities with skate parks report that skate park users are courteous and well-mannered. Graffiti, vandalism, and other bad behavior are unusual occurences at skate parks. The City will post rules (see attached) at the skate park. Recently, the City adopted an Ordinance prohibiting drinking in Fanno Creek Park and the three down town parks (Liberty Park, Main Street Park, and Commercial Park). The police department has been monitoring these parks and it has been reported that drinking has been reduced significantly since the Ordinance was adopted. The City went through an extensive site location process. Several of the considered sites ran up against negative public input. The City Hall site was chosen because many City staff, in addition to City Police, will be able to visually monitor the skate park during weekdays and on weekends by police department employees. Thanks Dan Plaza Parks and Facilities Manager City of Tigard 503 718 2590 daniel©tigard-or.gov CC: "Jim Wolf' <27047 @tigard-or.gov>, "Cheryl Caines" <CHERYLC @tigard-or gov>, "Dennis Koellermeier" <DENNIS @tigard-or.gov> 1.21 Caines-Skate Park Pa e 1 From: "Joanne Zimmer" <Joannez @pnwtor.com> To: <Cherylc @tigard-or.gov> Date: 2/6/2007 8:06:24 AM Subject: Skate Park February 6, 2007 City of Tigard Attn: Cheryl Caines, Asst. Planner 13125 SW Hall Blvd. Tigard, OR 97223 Dear Cheryl, We are writing you to comment on the proposed skate park. We live directly across Fanno Creek Park from the city offices and do not welcome said skate park for the following reasons: 1. There are already homeless people that hang out in the park drinking alcoholic beverages to the point of drunkenness. Of greater concern are the groups of temporary workers that hang out in the park down by A-Boy drinking after their daily shift ends. The City of Tigard doesn't seem to have a handle on this, much less adding another negative dynamic of gangs of kids hanging out in the park, either before or after their recreational activities at the skate park. While the above tend to occur during the nicer weather, that's when most of us want to also use the park. 2. We feel this skate park would increase the numbers of people wandering through our neighborhood and may, therefore, increase crime on our street. 3. The increased noise level would not be appreciated. 4. Increased traffic congestion on Hall Blvd. would not be appreciated. 5. When the commuter train station goes in, we could be looking at gangs of kids from across the metro area causing problems listed above. 6. All of the above may well lead to depressed home values in our neighborhood. As an alternative we feel that something of this nature and use would be better placed in an area such as somewhere off Hunziker where the noise, congestion. etc. would not be bothersome to neighboring homeowners. We are adamantly opposed to the skate park. Please take our comments under advisement as planning for the skate park gets underway. We would hate to have to move from an area that we have lived in for almost 12 years because our city representatives failed to adequately consider the impact on taxpaying neighbors. Thank you for your time and consideration. Cheryl Caines - Skate Park Page 2 Sincerely, Joanne Zimmer and Ted Hedlund 13331 SW Chelsea Loop Tigard, OR 97223 Ph: (503)624-2746 P.S. If these comments are required under our signatures through snail mail or dropped off at your office, please let me know immedaitely. Thank you. Cheryl Caines-RE: Skate Park Pa.e 1 From: Cheryl Caines To: Plaza, Daniel; Zimmer, Joanne Date: 2/13/2007 4:40:24 PM Subject: RE: Skate Park Ms. Zimmer, The applicant has provided some information regarding traffic generation. I have reviewed the information with our Engineer, Kim McMillan. The information provided states that developed parks generate approximately 50 trips per day per acre. The skate park is approximately 1/3 of an acre and thus would generate about 18 trips per day. These numbers are realistic. The data is based on information gathered in California and so Kim is searching for local data in order to do a comparison. A traffic study is not required for the project based on the numbers of current trips on Hall Boulevard (14,100). To warrant a traffic study, the park would have to create an additional 500 trips per day. Because Hall Boulevard is a state highway, the City does not control where lights are placed along the street. Oregon Department of Transportation makes those decisions. In the case of skate park, the number of new trips generated is minimal compared to the total number on Hall Boulevard and therefore the installation of a light is not required. I hope this helps ease your concerns about Skate Park. Cheryl Caines Assistant Planner City of Tigard (503) 718-2437 >>> "Joanne Zimmer" <Joannez @pnwtor.com> 02/13 2:36 PM >>> Thank you for responding to our concerns. While you response is appreciated, it has the tone of a decision made by people who have their minds made up and, furthermore, do not live near the proposed skate park. I ride a bike myself and assure you that my concern is not noise made by the bicycles or skates themselves, but by those wearing the skates or riding the bikes. In other words, this is a proposal for an outdoor park, is it not? I take exception to the fact that the rules for the proposed skate park list no boom boxes, stereos or radios as the 2nd to the last rule. While rule no. 6 is appreciated, it doesn't sound like those involved with the skate park proposal really take the noise that it could generate very seriously. Again, this is proposed to be very near my house and, if there's nothing that I can do at this point to keep this park from winding up at the proposed site, I would appreciate it if rule no. 17 was made rule no. 3, or at the very lease rule no. 4. I'm keeping in mind your own rule no. 18, this skate park is not supervised. The ban on alcohol in the park is certainly a positive step and I look forward to seeing some positive results from same. No one has addressed our traffic concerns. We were duped once by the library (yes, we attended meetings) and it appears we're about to be duped once again by those behind the skate park. It's time to put a traffic light at O'Mara and Hall so that we can better get in and out of Cheryl Caines - RE: Comments on Skate Park Page 1 From: "Dalby, John K." <John.Dalby©tvfr.com> To: "Cheryl Caines" <CHERYLC @tigard-or.gov> Date: 2/27/2007 2:49:17 PM Subject: RE: Comments on Skate Park The fire district has no comments or conditions regarding this proposal insofar as fire apparatus access or firefighting water supplies are concerned. John K. Dalby, Deputy Fire Marshal II Tualatin Valley Fire & Rescue, North Division 14480 SW Jenkins Road Beaverton, OR 97005-1152 503-356-4723 From: Cheryl Caines [mailto:CHERYLC©tigard-or.gov] Sent: Monday, February 26, 2007 4:04 PM To: Jim Wolf; Rob Murchison ; Dalby, John K. Subject: Comments on Skate Park Hello all, The skate park decision is scheduled to be issued at the end of this week, so I must be done with the report on Wednesday. If you have comments on the project, please forward them on so they can be incorporated into the report. Thank you. Cheryl Caines (503) 718-2437 Che I Caines- Re: Skate Park Page 11 From: Christine Darnell To: Cheryl Caines Date: 2/1/2007 8:29:55 AM Subject: Re: Skate Park 7.40.180 Exceptions. The following shall not be considered violations of this article, even if the sound limit specified in Section 7.40.160 is exceeded: A. Non-amplified sounds created by organized athletic or other group activities, when such activities are conducted on property generally used for such purposes. such as stadiums, parks. schools, and athletic fields, during normal hours for such events. Nice catch. Yes I would think it is exactly what was intended. Is it permissible for you to require "rules" signage or anything? Just thinking about stereos which are not exempted - 7.40.170 B2 and the part of the noise exemption above that says"normal hours for such events"which makes me wonder if there is a lockout time. Also, it appears that 180.A is still safe from: 7.40.190 Maximum Limit For Certain Activities. Notwithstanding Section 7.40.180, the creation of noise by any activity subject to the exceptions listed in Sections 7.40.180.E, 7.40.180.F, 7.40.180.H, or 7.40.180.1, >>> Cheryl Caines 1/31/2007 2:49:09 PM »> Christine, Would you see 7.40.180 as a exception that would apply to Skate Park noise levels? Thanks, Cheryl . ■a 14 II REQUEST FOR COMMENTS DATE: January30,2007 TO: Jim Wolf,Tigard Police Department Crime Prevention Officer FROM City of Tigard Planning Division STAFF CONTACT: Cheryl Gaines,Assistant Planner(x2437) Phone: (503) 639-4171 Fax: (503) 624-3681 Email: Cherylc @tigard-or.gov SITE DEVELOPMENT RE VIEW(SDR) 2006-00005 - TIGARD SKATE PARK - REQUEST: The applicant is requesting approval to construct a 15,000 square-foot skate park on the City Hall site. The site consists of three parcels that total 9.84 acres. LOCATION: 13125 SW Hall Boulevard,Washington County Tax Map 2S 102DA, Tax Lot 400 and 401; and 8720 SW Burnham Street; Washington County Tax Map 2S 102DA, Tax Lot 200. ZONE: CBD: Central Business District. The CBD zoning district is designed to provide a concentrated central business district, centered on the City's historic downtown, including a mix of civic, retail and office uses. Single-family attached housing, at a maximum density of 12 units/net acre, equivalent of the R-12 zoning district, and multi-family housing at a minimum density of 32 units/acre, equivalent to the R-40 zoning district, are permitted outright. A wide range of uses, including but not limited to adult entertainment, utilities, facilities with drive-up windows, medical centers, major event entertainment and gasoline stations, are permitted conditionally. APPLICABLE REVIEW CRITERIA: Community Development Code Chapters 18.360, 18.390, 18.520, 18.705, 18.725, 18.745, 18.755, 18.765, 18.780, 18.790, 18.795 and 18.810. Attached are the Site Plan, Vicinity Map and Applicant's Materials for your review. From information supplied by various departments and agencies and from other information available to our staff,a report and recommendation will be prepared and a decision will be rendered on the proposal in the near future. If you wish to comment on this application, WE NEED YOUR COMMENTS BACK BY: FEBRUARY 13, 2007. You may use the space provided below or attach a separate letter to return your comments. If you are unable to respond by the above date,please phone the staff contact noted above with your comments and confirm your comments in writing as soon as possible. If you have any questions,contact the Tigard Planning Division, 13125 SW Hall Boulevard,Tigard,OR 97223. PLEASE CHECK THE FOLLOWING ITEMS THAT APPLY: We have reviewed the proposal and have no objections to it. Please contact of our office. Please refer to the enclosed letter or email. Written comments provided below: Name&Number of Person Commenting: �. .' . *t I /_�r1 \\�✓C , , ot, CITY of TIGARD - GEOGRAPHIC INFORMATION SYSTEM 20 q� .4.„s �,, VICINITY MAP 12 ,, s� #4 • 4 `�' SDR2006-00005 �� �� TIGARD SKATE PARK ,..." , . ..A. ,. . • .. . . ...L,p ..,_..,., ..1 0,' Subject Site . - } , £ems+ o M.i_ ..".. . ... :. •. • • ,ii Tigard Area Map- A �� : . . ___' 0 100 200 300 400 500 Feet' All 10F . 'NIP lit 111.11101111 U■. v TIGARD • 1 Information on this map is for general location only and•I should be verified with the Development Services Division. . 13125 SW Hall Blvd • Tigard,OR 97223 (503)639-4171 ♦ \ ";. _ http:/Iwww.G.tigard.or.us Community Development Plot date:Jan 29,2007;C:\magic\MAGIC03.APR 4 \\ IR-5/8 YPC IR-5/ I 11 1ST q•-- -- - . \ i \ 11 - * 282 ``C."• ' •r t''� 1 Y DAVID ANDERSON r„, ,:. €„', -----------.___�-_ �� SKATEPARK ELEVATIONS r w s . SW BURNHAM STREET ---------- y,\ �&�OREGON•`.' �;4 . stwrcPA 'c a. `I ___1r— E A r P R . a ; .1w..e Nter:PA.. , 7 . 1 0 � r tAi':•FFBIEV pyp`i0. 4''x� � `' S,!;::_ ..IRya14, t . , 1 I i �a l (�(•Q'1�� F•��sH. ... O. Jl Y I.� M 11 r—_r _ _ _— J 1 LJ \•\ ``\ -- - ,rc WUi `; �` ♦♦♦»♦ {{� CyyII I I TTT1 TT1 • aN ^ ' 4A 1 Niche / Skatepark Lot – 31 Spaces \ _ 0 • i � �.d:n.00so' AO 4'r i:•P•c:/4'j - _L. ► i '.; 1�r r -- ��p `.:'•A'; 'Bat/ :�T i - JJ ,Ea :;wJ::\\\ <40 2 r i ' L., ,.,, - .,n.,. ��• 4 l.111il€!1111 Gill I IIIIuiluull RRiiIIIIIII1IIIlIIlilidull4iuuli ll !IIIIii.lduli uinrflllUl!I:. "' I' i I i • r I I yi a �r� • \ DEDICATION 4 I'9i'b''�8� li<'1� .�s9t"s`.�I '+s:r4:�lt4°eltti'a ' Ili. 9 g r1 144' ,,.. ,,.a NM lm A••• AAAe 0444 Aws: 1 1 ` C DICA ON\ 0 0 s ii rt f CITY G C .- To \ ' 1'I.:Ft'-61 4 •D"4''x•4si.iW.'s•M• 'al 1y11 ', ' HALL "G �1 o.D.O T. WEST FACING ELEVATION """.e.w a j jru J ice 'or'eR!. •>f'tARro gu.Rfl I ANNEX 1'3:'., e ,4 Q • •��• •1 Scale: 1" = 20' • ,' a PX/o. , 'ss amt.Flrl • ' (NICHE) ` 1, -.- ` Drainage Calculations '"K - -*• ` * ; 6 e 11 - 1 �111 f f T 111 T 11 l r I J - t o, r . .::e:3: PROPOSED SKAIEPA,IK E IS I i_ t jr 1 :e.❖`. \ 1 I JJ �'t.:.:::.i:$ ESISttW ELEVA1Kr1 rI�r ill! i _ Al' .City•Hall North Lot – 63 Spaces �"1 :; I, �� C IA f0' I l ( `) I fir. PROPOSED a - - – _ I _i��—__. _ � C _�:It SKATEPARK 5 �„� 4( „at,...,,,,,....._..„......,.,.„.IIIdlllllllll i1iIIIIIIBIIIIIIIIIII ! 111111111111d11111 t2 I !,��ta`''�[ C 4'r �- a 1• i,4,...: I I _ +e ,.. I e , c Final Kkotepo k bowl design is not cor te4 1 W I I 1 l 1 -- \ C �— S .• Min.Finish Floor eve” 149.6 i SOUTH FACING ELEVATION 44��665 a �s�n� :•:..f• /}kjA•L(5`( C Police North Lot – 82 Spaces —� ' C vim• I C ',' _ _ scale: 1' = 20'- ,l', —� I C �� 8 3 1 W 1 CC I I -; _ r,I I I I I r• a�d]q �+ = Q ° /� 1\! C �•� Proposed Slorm.ae.r MY Erislno Cold,Basin / Cry -= !� il I`----1 f 1 C/V �'/V lc/V I vdler Gutter Dope—b Proposed Catch Bosh -i.: 144'4434444,4 Filer Vwlt + -`. ___.1 RIEI EL 151.06 ���'' ,�:� � '�� ;j-�; RN EL 152 e.• Proposed Oron Line — RIM EL 151.5 "', If ■E.1(1 4144 76 I - 3 TC 1OUT 146.21, I.E.N 147.6 s' 4 iIIIII11 IIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIII' 111.,II III!IIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIII!!!IIIIIIIIIIIIIIIII!II IIIIIIIIIII IIIIII 1111 W - I kil I.E.617145.1 ;I 1 4' 7 trir:'1;iF'Q �I �E e,•at;u5 re;w=S"4f�'rf.,"t i4?b1braiVi) SKATEPARK WALL 1 1.0 inc.. - - --`1 I i U T :i:i:iii ` 4'N+x wAll RE1cNT ,� I `_ 1 _ -v., ;,,; , EAST FACING ELEVATION +- __1. l_ 14' %ISTNG SIDEWALK • , -- -- -- -- _. W.- y `A- A;.. v. Se. 4ti .v. ,/ I Scale: 1" = 20' z ,* tit tit tit * ti tit .t #tiY +� ti.+��`��� —I I v 1 O 0 I.30. io sic° Q I i ❑ (� Q r •� 1 11 !+ it I 1 _ I I 1 i �" I- w .,, i' • ry rw qe 4 .4 I I 4 II liiIII1 liliP!'IIIII luiilllll m!1!II 1 111111Illi iI1 . ! 0!r!III 5:i3#i!!i L L11 I.IIII' f " - -- --�?-- �`, _��- -- ? ti�l 1 14 i i ! 1 4 I�?li1 1I1��1Titii'1�1'13111Mai 1 Its= I.r 'I-LL Z_co �y POLICE e = ,,,...."1.11.1 t @ -111111111111111 _. I �— NORTH FACING ELEVATION V OO} z N OG i.'l ",t I I Scale: 1• = 20' 1- �Q - 1,(......,1/4. { City Hall South Lot – 33 Spaces I I I I— U 0) ,`03 -� ' �_` __ 12.5' I I . LEGEND SITE AREA 1 • W__1_J__1__ _lJ__,__ o�i '. 4 �/_-61= _ v I r I SYMBOL DESCRIPTION Square Feet % SKATEPARK Acres S j {c"'� SITE PLAN lN, e••••• A```-._......_••--' ® ® -�-- ' i I 4w"� Existing Tree to Remain Total Site Area 9.84 428,630 100% 4'J\0 " # i--4 See Existing Conditions Plan for Landscape Area 2.86 124,582 29% ELEVATIONS a Y --- j I 1 0 Size and Species Impervious area 6.98 304,049 71% * I I 1 _ . ' r ii • rM Existing Tree to be Removed revision.: I ) + I I I ''--- .1 \ ° I i ' ( I O Proposed Parking Lot Tree CITY HALL CITY HALL ill i . A ....\ Existing Light Pole ` dates 01/02/07 , .,I i i `\\\1 i+ ,��;:;•;::: scale:Varies 1 E1 I /•......:44: Proposed Parking Lot Landscaping drawn: DA It �.� it ! 1 Job 4'4: • I --•'"rte r I C/V Carpool /Vonpool Parking Spaces —" --- 11 1 - II I I 1..1/C Handicap Parking Spaces• ,.---''- - it II C Compact Parking Spaces i1,EvIa114g Itch Bdapr -- - - VICINITY MAP 1 • II L SKATEPARK SITE PLAN IN 1 SCALE: 1" -- 30' , , r • . • • ' ' , ------------ GI5TEk SW BURNHAM STREET • 1 �� 232 ��• !�— ['-. F iP6DAV1D ANDERSON , RYBr Z9u 41Y]Fl-u �0.@]]j9� ` OREGON �� ii...---9sili MPH "): s OE AR TAX LOT 200 �\ J• � \`\ \is\:\ 40*' / N\ A Z ��i bJAXLOO ----`--! ii.'-a \ ,, j. �`i 1 L F. 1 �� '• l0n r HALL 1 o ,gy � '�J05 W • ■ ANNEX— yr.i' ,,,` ��R'E"-ten �r �.. IE IN 15o SS PM umawn 1,31' Ca e e e e ... , 1 (NICHE) Q O _—__.--.__---- - . __ ri �� t v- +!'= ter+ A2=' �;- . II7: 4' 1 VICINITY MAP ■ ..Fi i ] l I I 1TtTH12 ; I ;1 ,,____,,,,,.. /,--- ---�.� C2ts:.: ._S IE OUT'46.37 .i �'' �„ / u, IE IN TM ,x6.42 LEGEND /' S rrt__.. --,!.k--- -- -r-_` __,....-• - IE IN NORTH 148.7 >j -- 21 l'-‘ isy;' : IE IN NE 1N47.1.27 - -- I f. �� �' % 1C'" \ e'$-„. • SYMBOL DESCRIPTION 1 I..y Ill e,11. I 1, qL-M T'; t _ 152--..______„. —` I # Light Pole CO yt- 4 ,``` m .;.. .• �--- . -' ^.I J 1 - -- ---e-'--c Electric Line ! 1 z �y,��.._. o W -� ¢¢fi�t' ( _,`+t r. I t U I'r—e (.1f+ :5 1 a ; _ "1!-'•i. ;L:•:>; J I -- r4 � l- f/1 --- `y;-r 2 � Tree + `/ V Q J = I 1092 SUnwY HwMar I La.:2------ � I 1 I �I I` 'l l r . v~i , ` IE N T(N)4145. I +41'e- eio Sle cies r � r -?'`\,1--: '"."• i w a 1 z w` w -. '-'1e IN (W)146.f -Species and adber Sze Noels-lo-eabv) I 1 I , -I a X I l� I �,52`� Contour - 1' Intervals Ct t a , c _. _ss---�. I I J/ `-TAX LOT 401 �1 _ �, a a TAX LOT 400 .. I 1 '-- __-.. / ,.'"*-31-74 d. / `~ I I }t , i i .�`I .Y CB Catch Basin n .`h 1�� r 1 1 I LJ.. L_ . t._.I -`� 510E W __--__ __.._.._.—._.._ — I I 1 I ,-e- _.-:► - Storm Drain Line i. 1 __e. - LLJ 0r . .-e5 11.t'aL .1 Fnc°°. F°z a „,,,,,,..,„_444.;;,.„-.,,,;„owl-} • y u e-�` _ ..1.:t- i ' -� i , r -- IIri Ig0tion (-�_- ~-.�. --�� _ "� r I 1 I -_� Gas Line (, au®, p.5belond s aawalk t. 1 ,r-------- - f I 1 I IL j i I LyL, ”�e#�- i - r— __./- �FII�LED !TH DIRT i l G �. . i rz `_'_"�f ! . _ .rs 7..,,��''i��-aac-•-. m i e• Ni -' s�p� Water Line rU yam. �- - t5e 57@ °�.~..��,�.��°�.. - [a 1°w I '` ,c11 ' a - 1 -... POLICE ` \` ,� t .•1 1_111__ _ "'^_"4-'- _y..-_^- ... _ 1 _ _ ..-;.-I 'T-c--- ----'"- TV Line - •�\ (fit jl lid . ; % `- LT .c ---. -------- \.//� ,ri,,, i R/w Right-of-Way IL _Z CO I I it f . . ,,.`�-r +n-�-�=_z. - t i 9W I 1`. 46j' 1 0 Q N �a U t.�;g ` . _ '� „ _ ;'_.. -? ;� s °.. _ I ' EXISTING . I !' '• f ! j l ji1, \ CONDITIONS 1 \ � 'wi'km, I I i L I _ url.lath.43, 1 ., I �-1 • 1 .∎ I! I { j i ( Ii �>y 1 CITY HALL �' ;f f �! \ CITY HALL TAX LOT 401 ! ', \ revision. i II I I I1;71:1 1{ I I1 I I _� 11 I I/*i \\ dale: 12/06/06 1 �' \ scale: 1- = 30' F IE W I \\\ . IE OU:1-43:7-11313673 II \ job no: li \\ - 1 i \ 1 I L� v I ■ 1 EXISTING CO\ DITTO\' ' SCALE: 1" 30' /\ 2 ' � ® UI • MEMORANDUM TIGARD TO: Cheryl Gaines,Assistant Planner FROM: Jim Wolf, Crime Prevention Officer DATE: February 27, 2007 RE: Request For Comments re: Tigard Skate Park Several concerns immediately surface in regards to the placement of the Tigard Skate Park at the currently approved location. It has been mentioned numerous times, in multiple communications, inferring that the skate park's close proximity to the Tigard Police Department is desirable in ways of providing a "built-in" security component. It serves to mention that typically officers are not inside the building,but rather in the field servicing the calls for assistance or patrolling within the community. If the notion that police are always available at the "station" to remedy a situation at the skate park; that assumption would likely be incorrect. The facility will need to be "policed" on its own with respect to the enforcement of"park rules." The police will be available through typical and conventional methods such as being dispatched through the regional communications center. If a situation arises at the skate park that warrants police assistance, the complainant may use a telephone located in the police lobby if no other means is available. The lobby is open to the public from lam until 11pm daily. However, the expectation that an officer is immediately available inside the building at any given time is untrue. Police will be dispatched as available and according to priority. Concerns have also been expressed regarding the availability of parking at Tigard City Hall. Specifically, on days when Municipal Court has an abundant case load, parking may be scarce. The availability of parking for the public and employees is a concern. In addition, specifically police employees have concerns regarding the security of their personal vehicles parked at City Hall. It would not be unreasonable to surmise that Tigard Police Officers may have in the past, or possibly in the future, encounter certain users of the skate park. This is not to assume that users of the skate park are "all" problematic; on the contrary, the majority of the skate park users are respectable, upstanding members of the community. However, there are isolated incidents that may require police contact with respect to users of the skate park. For officers involved, there are concerns about retaliation, primarily in the form of vandalism to their vehicles. Understandably, users of the skate park will have ample opportunity to visually observe officers arriving and departing for work in the parking areas located adjacent to the skate park. In 2006 an ordinance was created in Tigard that limited consumption of alcoholic beverages in certain Tigard parks. Fanno Creek Park,which is adjacent to the property at Tigard City Hall and nearby the location for the planned Tigard Skate Park, should also be included in the area prohibiting alcohol.The ordinance was created as a vehicle to help manage the escalating issues of transients using the parks to consume alcohol, which created safety and environmental concerns voiced by citizens who used the parks as well. Evidence of litter, human waste, urinating in public and other illicit activities appeared to be aggravated by the permitting of alcohol consumption in Tigard parks. It is important to make clear whether the Tigard Skate Park is included in this parameter. The Police Department would support that the skate park be included in the alcohol ban. It is likely that most users of the skate park will be juveniles, and by law underage for consuming alcohol. However, there may be opportunity for visitors to the skate park to be of legal drinking age. The co-mingling of these two distinct age groups can present problems related to alcohol. Clear defining rules need to be established. (--- �,-. o Oregon Oregon Department of Transportation "' `` Z ODOT Region 1 9 Theodore R.Kolongovki,Governor 123 N W Flanders St Portland,OR 97209-4037 Telephone(503)731-8200 Date: 2/23/2007 FAX (503)731-8259 ODOT Response to Local Land Use Notification Project Name: Tigard Skate Park Applicant: City of Tigard Jurisdiction: City of Tigard Case#:SDR2006-00005 Site Address: 131125 SW Hall Blvd Legal Description: 2S102DA Tigard, OR 97222 Tax Lot(s) 0401 ,0400 . _ State Highway: Hall Blvd Mileposts: 8.94- The site is adjacent to the referenced state highway. ODOT has permitting authority for the state highway and an interest in ensuring that the proposed land use is compatible with its safe and efficient operation. Please direct the applicant to the District Contact indicated below to determine permit requirements and obtain application information. ODOT RECOMMENDED LOCAL CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL E Right of way dedication as necessary to accommodate the planned cross section identified in the local Transportation System Plan shall be provided through deed to the Oregon Department of Transportation. The dedication must be to the State of Oregon, Oregon Department of Transportation. The ODOT District contact will assist in coordinating the dedication. ODOT should provide verification to the local jurisdiction that the dedication requirement has been fulfilled. The property owner must be the signatory for the dedication and will be responsible for a certified environmental assessment of the site prior to transfer of property to the Department. ® An ODOT Miscellaneous Permit must be obtained for all work in the highway right of way. An ODOT Drainage Permit is required for connection to state highway drainage facilities. Connection will only be considered if the site's drainage naturally enters ODOT right of way. The applicant must provide ODOT District with a preliminary drainage plan showing impacts to the highway right of way. A drainage study prepared by an Oregon Registered Professional Engineer is usually required by ODOT if: 1. Total peak runoff entering the highway right of way is greater than 1.77 cubic feet per second; or 2. The improvements create an increase of the impervious surface area greater than 10.758 square feet. Please send a copy of the Notice of Decision including conditions of approval to: ODOT Region 1 Planning Development Review 123 NW Flanders St Portland, OR 97209 Development Review Planner Marah Danielson Phone: (503)731-8258 Traffic Contact: Jason Grassman PE Phone: (503) 731-8221 District 2A Contact: Sam Hunaidi Phone: (503) 229-5002 ODOT Log No: 2717 r 1111 a 1111 • REQUEST FOR COMMENTS DATE: Jam tary30,2007 TO: Brian ock,Co "ercia Plans aminer FROM: City of Tigard Planning Division STAFF CONTACT: Cheryl Gaines,Assistant Planner(x2437) Phone: (503) 639-4171 Fax: (503) 624-3681 Email: CherylcOtigard-or.gov SITE DEVELOPMENT REVIEW(SDR) 2006-00005 - TIGARD SKATE PARK - REQUEST: The applicant is requesting approval to construct a 15,000 square-foot skate park on the City Hall site. The site consists of three parcels that total 9.84 acres. LOCATION: 13125 SW Hall Boulevard,Washington County Tax Map 2S 102DA, Tax Lot 400 and 401; and 8720 SW Burnham Street; Washington County Tax Map 2S 102DA, Tax Lot 200. ZONE: CBD: Central Business District. The CBD zoning district is designed to provide a concentrated central business district, centered on the City's historic downtown, including a mix of civic, retail and office uses. Single-family attached housing, at a maximum density of 12 units/net acre, equivalent of the R-12 zoning district, and multi-family housing at a minimum density of 32 units/acre, equivalent to the R-40 zoning district, are permitted outright. A wide range of uses, including but not limited to adult entertainment, utilities, facilities with drive-up windows, medical centers, major event entertainment and gasoline stations, are permitted conditionally. APPLICABLE REVIEW CRITERIA: Community Development Code Chapters 18.360, 18.390, 18.520, 18.705, 18.725, 18.745, 18.755, 18.765, 18.780, 18.790, 18.795 and 18.810. Attached are the Site Plan, Vicinity Map and Applicant's Materials for your review. From information supplied by various departments and agencies and from other information available to our staff,a report and recommendation will be prepared and a decision will be rendered on the proposal in the near future. If you wish to comment on this application, WE NEED YOUR COMMENTS BACK BY: FEBRUARY 13, 2007. You may use the space provided below or attach a separate letter to return your comments. If you are unable to respond by the above date, please phone the staff contact noted above with your comments and confirm your comments in writing as soon as possible. If you have any questions,contact the Tigard Planning Division, 13125 SW Hall Boulevard,Tigard,OR 97223. PLEASE CHECK THE FOLLOWING ITEMS THAT APPLY: We have reviewed the proposal and have no objections to it. Please contact of our office. Please refer to the enclosed letter or email. Written comments provided below: [Name&Number of Person Commenting: A k RECEIVED PLANNING FEB 0 2 2007 CITY OF TIGARD PGE 9480 SW Boeckman Rd. Wilsonville,OR. 97070 City of Tigard Planning Division C/o Cheryl Caines 13125 SW Hall Blvd. Tigard, OR 97223 Cheryl, This response is to the proposed Tigard Skate Park. After review of site plans there may be a conflict with PGE facilities. I have included a PGE map with existing facilities. Please be aware that if the PGE facilities have to be relocated, the responsibility for the cost to relocate will be the City of Tigard's. Ken Gutierrez Project Manager Service Design & Construction 503-570-4412 ken.gutierrez(a�pgn.com a I 1 1951 50 \ (� 707 O �// T 00160 \ y� \ B 00160/ PL 03083 \\ °qS C 5867 2-350 IOLM AL x�r ��� \ 90990 0619 1-4/0 AL XLP -4 CU N \ 2007-40\ 01818- 03040 1-2/0 AL XLP O -v \ 00130/ 1972-45 -14 S \ \ PL 03040 03041 F OT J687'3- 2 J lyyc�° L03o83 03043 \ 0\ 1989-50 \ \ XLP J 1350 2-350 KCM AL XLP 01818- \ 1-4/0 AL XLP 8'150/ \ 1-2/0 AL XLP e / el-- PL 0 143 6000 C 100 21 2A t B 100 4 23 �\ A 100 4 22 -� 04456\\ 20 10 0 PL 20575 1966-70 \ -... zD V 19830 _ \ J PL20 - 01818- 01 8- / 01810 o05 � \ / \ A 5 12'6`4 0053'/ PL00002 01821- PL20.30 00535/ P 205 \ PL 20535 01821- 01821- 0182 - 0530 DODO2�np 2053 00565/ 00555/ \ PL0521530 `� 986-2b!UUI-3 '`'19086- 5 •L 20570 PL20560 \ IIIIJJJJ 00536/ .'570 ..� .8560 \ �I 01818- PL2053 :8-25 "%1•:8-25 01821- pp002/ 03044 00525/ PL00002 05604 '0525 - PL20525 01821- 01:21- 19�j4e�`j_ 1967 0 \\ 01821- •86-2':,� 01821- PL020570 04560/20560 1 00270/ 4 \ 00520 Ill 00526/ PL 20.20 PL 20525 V01821- 01821- 0182 - m 00551/ 00546/ 0054,/ ABC 2 AL-DB ' \ co 20520 I, PL205 1986 090- 1988525 PL 20545 P Lam4r`, \ v�uwYM a 20540 �4 VT 00047 - v 9::- -. X1821- r ' - 01821--•' 01821- ' ' Al 00516/ 00550/ 00510/ 00545/ 00505/ 00540/ 00500/' PL 2051 PL20505 PL2050 r 1 PL 20550 PL20510 PL20545 PL20540'l 1'01 ��'Is:1118 8' �,_�2'•00 ... X19:.-2 1-I/0 AL XL-1- CU B . 01821- 01821- 01821- • 01821 00511/ 00508/ 00501/ I 0051-/ PL 20510 PL 20505 PL 2050 L,� PL 20515 3- 4 F1 )OT -6 AL-TX PL03J44 PD 0904 J64737-86 Y ti 42 ��4 _I F1S4T x 'L03b,5 ABC 225 510 --350 KCM AL XLP 3-2 CU BSO N 115 KV/A8C-795 AA SHERW000-WEST PORTLAND 3 RUNS IN 3 m 01821- 4'CUST COND a 0 .4 00260/ PL03045 �� ' 03045 _ 6 1967-50 e00A 3- ' • -' -, 2-4'SPARE PD 00048 0 9 ABC 112.5 158 I— U y U y Q -J m a r'1 O x i J U V Cr M , Scale: 1 su = 100 ft Field View q in • RE QUE ST FOR COMMENTS DATE: January 30,2007 TO PER ATTACHE D FROM: City of Tigard Planning Division STAFF CONTACT: Cheryl Caines,Assistant Planner(x2437) Phone: (503) 639-4171 Fax: (503) 624-3681 Email:Cherylc @tigard-or.gov SITE DEVELOPMENT REVIEW(SDR) 2006-00005 - TIGARD SKATE PARK - REQUEST: The applicant is requesting approval to construct a 15,000 square-foot skate park on the City Hall site. The site consists of three parcels that total 9.84 acres. LOCATION: 13125 SW Hall Boulevard,Washington County Tax Map 2S 102DA, Tax Lot 400 and 401; and 8720 SW Burnham Street; Washington County Tax Map 2S 102DA, Tax Lot 200. ZONE: CBD: Central Business District. The CBD zoning district is designed to provide a concentrated central business district, centered on the City's historic downtown, including a mix of civic, retail and office uses. Single-family attached housing, at a maximum density of 12 units/net acre, equivalent of the R-12 zoning district, and multi-family housing at a minimum density of 32 units/acre, equivalent to the R-40 zoning district, are permitted outright. A wide range of uses, including but not limited to adult entertainment, utilities, facilities with drive-up windows, medical centers, major event entertainment and gasoline stations, are permitted conditionally. APPLICABLE REVIEW CRITERIA: Community Development Code Chapters 18.360, 18.390, 18.520, 18.705, 18.725, 18.745, 18.755, 18.765, 18.780, 18.790, 18.795 and 18.810. Attached are the Site Plan, Vicinity Map and Applicant's Materials for your review. From information supplied by various departments and agencies and from other information available to our staff,a report and recommendation will be prepared and a decision will be rendered on the proposal in the near future. If you wish to comment on this application, WE NEED YOUR COMMENTS BACK BY: FEBRUARY 13, 2007. You may use the space provided below or attach a separate letter to return your comments. If you are unable to respond by the above date, please phone the staff contact noted above with your comments and confirm your comments in writing as soon as possible. If you have any questions,contact the Tigard Planning Division, 13125 SW Hall Boulevard,Tigard, OR 97223. PLEASE CHECK THE FOLLOWING ITEMS THAT APPLY: We have reviewed the proposal and have no objections to it. _ Please contact of our office. _ Please refer to the enclosed letter or email. Written comments provided below: Name&Number of Person Commenting: r'TY OF TIGARD REQUEST FOP "OMMENTS NOTIFICA. LIST FOR LAND USE & COMMUNITY DL JPMENT APPLICATIONS FILE NOS.: SDR ‘,7700(4-. -- 00005 FILE NAME: ,-.a..-,_i 5b�-k Park- CITIZEN INVOLVEMENT TEAMS 14-DAY PENDING APPLICATION NOTICE TO INTERESTED PARTIES OF AREA: ❑Central EEast ❑South ❑West CITY OFFICES LONG RANGE PLANNING/Ron Bunch,Planning Mgr. COMMUNITY DVLPMNT.DEPT./Planning-Engineering Techs. POLICE DEPT./Jim Wolf,Crime Prevention Officer -BUILDING DIVISION/Mark(residential)Brian(commercial) NGINEERING DEPT./Kim McMillan,Dvlpmnt.Review Engineer _PUBLIC WORKS/Matt Stine,Urban Forester CITY ADMINISTRATION/Cathy Wheatley,City Recorder PUBLIC WORKS/Rob Murchison,Project Engineer _PLANNING COMMISSION(+11 sets) PLANNER—POST PROJECT SITE 10 BUSINESS DAYS PRIOR TO A PUBLIC HEARING! _HEARINGS OFFICER(+2 sets) SPECIAL DISTRICTS _ TUAL.HILLS PARK&REC.DIST.*jz'TUALATIN VALLEY FIRE&RESCUE st _ TUALATIN VALLEY WATER DISTRICT s CLEANWATER SERVICES• Planning Manager North Division Administrative Office Lee Walker/SWM Program 15707 SW Walker Road John K.Dalby,Deputy Fire Marshall PO Box 745 155 N.First Avenue Beaverton,OR 97006 14480 SW Jenkins Road Beaverton,OR 97075 Hillsboro,OR 97124 Beaverton,OR 97005-1152 LOCAL AND STATE JURISDICTIONS CITY OF BEAVERTON * _ CITY OF TUALATIN * _OR.DEPT.OF FISH&WILDLIFE _OR.DIV.OF STATE LANDS Planning Manager Planning Manager Devin Simmons,Habitat Biologist Melinda Wood(wLUN Form Required) _ Steven Sparks,Dev Svcs Manager 18880 SW Martinazzi Avenue North Willamette Watershed District 775 Summer Street NE,Suite 100 PO Box 4755 Tualatin,OR 97062 18330 NW Sauvie Island Road Salem,OR 97301-1279 Beaverton,OR 97076 Portland,OR 97231 OR.PUB.UTILITIES COMM. METRO-LAND USE&PLANNING * _OR.DEPT.OF GEO.&MINERAL IND. 550 Capitol Street NE CITY OF DURHAM * 600 NE Grand Avenue 800 NE Oregon Street,Suite 5 Salem,OR 97310-1380 City Manager Portland,OR 97232-2736 Portland,OR 97232 17160 SW Upper Boones Fry.Rd. _ Bob Knight,Data Resource Center(zcA) _US ARMY CORPS.OF ENG. Durham,OR 97224 _ Paulette Allen,Growth Management Coordinator _OR.DEPT.OF LAND CONSERV.&DVLP. Kathryn Harris(Maps&cws Lotter oniy) _ Mel Huie,Greenspaces Coordinator(cPArzoA) Larry French(Comp Plan Amendments Only) Routing CENWP-OP-G _CITY OF KING CITY * _ Jennifer Budhabhatti,Regional Planner(wetiands) 635 Capitol Street NE,Suite 150 PO Box 2946 City Manager _ C.D.Manager,Growth Management Services Salem,OR 97301-2540 Portland,OR 97208-2946 15300 SW 116th Avenue King City,OR 97224 WASHINGTON COUNTY OR.DEPT.OF ENERGY i.Owen nes In Area) _OR.DEPT OF AVIATION(Monopole Towers) Dept.of Land Use&Transp. Bonneville Power Administration Tom Highland,Planning 155 N.First Avenue CITY OF LAKE OSWEGO * Routing TTRC—Attn: Renae Ferrera 3040 25th Street,SE Suite 350,MS 13 Planning Director PO Box 3621 Salem,OR 97310 Hillsboro,OR 97124 PO Box 369 Portland,OR 97208-3621 _Steve Conway(General Apps.) Lake Oswego,OR 97034 _Gregg Leion(CPA) OR.DEPT.OF ENVIRON.QUALITY(DEQ) ODOT,REGION 1 * Brent Curtis(CPA) _CITY OF PORTLAND (Notify for Wetlands and Potential Environmental Impacts) _Development Review Coordinator _Doria Mateja(zcA)Ms 14 Planning Bureau Director Regional Administrator _Carl Torland, Right-of-Way Section(vacarons) _Sr.Cartographer,cPAaCAius,a 1900 SW 4'h Avenue,Suite 4100 2020 SW Fourth Avenue,Suite 400 123 NW Flanders __tin Nims,Surveyor fzcA,MSr5 Portland,OR 97201 Portland,OR 97201-4987 Portland,OR 97209-4037 OR.PARKS&REC.DEPT. _WA.CO.CONSOL.COMM.AGNCY _ODOT,REGION 1 -DISTRICT 2A* _ODOT,RAIL DIVISION STATE HISTORIC Dave Austin(WCCCA)•g11"monopoleTowers' Sam Hunaidi.Assistant District Manager (Notify i1 ODOT R/R-Hwy.Crossing a Only Access to Land) PRESERVATION OFFICE PO Box 6375 6000 SW Raab Road Dave Lanning,Sr Crossing Safety Specialist (Notify if Property Has HD Overlay) Beaverton,OR 97007-0375 Portland,OR 97221 555-13th Street,NE,Suite 3 725 Sumner Street NE,Suite C Salem,OR 97301-4179 Salem,OR 97301 UTILITY PROVIDERS AND SPECIAL AGENCIES %PORTLAND WESTERN R/R,BURLINGTON NORTHERN/SANTA FE R/R,OREGON ELECTRIC R/R(Burlington Northern/Santa Fe R/R Predecessor) Bruce Carswell,President&General Manager 1200 Howard Drive SE Albany,OR 97322-3336 ./SOUTHERN PACIFIC TRANS.CO.R/R _METRO AREA COMMUNICATIONS v'COMCAST CABLE CORP. L TRI-MET TRANSIT DVLPMT. Clifford C.Cabe,Construction Engineer Debra Palmer(AnnexationsOniy) Gerald Backhaus see moo'«AreaCo,,yvv (If Project is Within Y.Mile ofa Transit Route) 5424 SE McLoughlin Boulevard Twin Oaks Technology Center 14200 SW Brigadoon Court Ben Baldwin,Project Planner Portland,OR 97232 1815 NW 169th Place,S-6020 Beaverton,OR 97005 710 NE Holladay Street Beaverton,OR 97006-4886 Portland,OR 97232 L PORTLAND GENERAL ELECTRIC L NW NATURAL GAS COMPANY AL VERIZON (MC030533) _QWEST COMMUNICATIONS Ken Gutierrez,Svc.Design Consultant Scott Palmer,Engineering Coord. Brandon Kehler,Engineering Lynn Smith,Eng.ROW Mgr. 9480 SW Boeckman Road 220 NW Second Avenue 20575 Vonnewmann Dr.,Suite 150 8021 SW Capitol Hill Rd,Rm 110 Wilsonville,OR 97070 Portland,OR 97209-3991 Beaverton,OR 97075-1100 Portland,OR 97219 _TIGARD/TUALATIN SCHOOL DIST.#23J _BEAVERTON SCHOOL DIST.#48 2 COMCAST CABLE CORP. _COMCAST CABLE COMMUNIC. Teri Brady,Administrative Offices Jan Youngquist,Demographics Alex Silantiev i see Mo,,,,oreacrrooco Diana Carpenter A,osE of Haii;N d 93w, 6960 SW Sandburg Street 16550 SW Merlo Road 9605 SW Nimbus Avenue,Bldg.12 10831 SW Cascade Avenue Tigard,OR 97223-8039 Beaverton,OR 97006-5152 Beaverton,OR 97008 Tigard,OR 97223-4203 * INDICATES AUTOMATIC NOTIFICATION IN COMPLIANCE WITH INTERGOVERNMENTAL AGREEMENT IF WITHIN 500'OF THE SUBJECT PROPERTY FOR ANY/ALL CITY PROJECTS (Project Planner Is Responsible For Indicating Parties To Notify). h:1 patty\masters/Request For Comments Notification List.doc (UPDATED: 8-Nov-06) MAILING RECORDS ErAFFIDAVIT OF MAILING I, Patricia L. Lunsford, being first duly sworn/affirm,on oath depose and say that I am a Senior Administrative Specialist for the City of Tigard,Washington County,Oregon and that I served the following: © NOTICE OF DECISION FOR SDR2006-00005/TIGARD SKATE PARK (File No/Name Reference) ❑ AMENDEDNCGIICE ® City of Tigard Planning Director A copy of the said notice being hereto attached,marked Exhibit"A",and by reference made a part hereof,was mailed to each named person(s) at the address(s) shown on the attached list(s),marked Exhibit"B",and by reference made a part hereof,on March 1,2007,and deposited in the United States Mail on March 1,2007,postage prepaid. IF (Pelson that repares 'otice) A i 17L STATE OF OREGON County of Washington ss. City of Tigard Subscribed and sworn/affirmed before me on the )14- day of c- ,2007. ■ ) � ` OFFICIAL SEAL �/�' w i s DIANE M JELDERKS (} i0W-.- l) k COMMI PUNUC.OREGON / A • (4 MY COMMISSION EXPIRES SEPT 25,2007? ARY PUB C : OREGO �1ti-�.�-ti'�-�ti1�-ti—�-� ...-„_ '. My Commission -xpires: S 5 (7 • EXHIBIT.A... NOTICE OF TYPE II DECISION SITE DEVELOPMENT REVIEW(SDR) 2006-00005 : TIGARD SKATE PARK 120 DAYS = 5/18/2007 SECTION I. APPLICATION SUMMARY FILE NAME: TIGARD SKATE PARK CASE NOS.: Site Development Review(SDR) SDR2006-00005 PROPOSAL: The applicant is requesting approval to construct a 15,000 square-foot skate park on the City Hall site. The site consists of three parcels that total 9.84 acres. APPLICANT/ City of Tigard APPLICANT'S Winterbrook Planning OWNER: Parks Department REP.: Attn: Ben Schonberger Attn:Dan Plaza 310 SW 4`h Ave.,Suite 1100 13125 SW Hall Blvd. Portland,OR 97204 Tigard,OR 97223 LOCATION: 13125 SW Hall Boulevard,Washington County Tax Map 2S102DA,Tax Lot 400 and 401; and 8720 SW Burnham Street; Washington County Tax Map 2S102DA, Tax Lot 200. ZONE: CBD: Central Business District. The CBD zoning district is designed to provide a concentrated central business district, centered on the City's historic downtown, including a mix of civic, retail and office uses. Single-family attached housing, at a maximum density of 12 units/net acre, equivalent of the R-12 zoning district, and multi-family housing at a minimum density of 32 units/acre, equivalent to the R-40 zoning district, are permitted outright.A wide range of uses,including but not limited to adult entertainment, utilities, facilities with drive-up windows, medical centers, major event entertainment and gasoline stations,are permitted conditionally. APPLICABLE REVIEW CRITERIA: Community Development Code Chapters 18.360, 18.390, 18.520, 18.705, 18.725, 18.745, 18.755, 18.765, 18.780, 18.790, 18.795 and 18.810. SECTION II. DECISION Notice is hereby given that the City of Tigard Community Development Director's designee has APPROVED the above request subject to certain conditions of approval. The findings and conclusions on which the decision is based are noted in Section VI. NOTICE OF TYPE II DECISION SDR2006-00005/TIGARD SKATE PARK PAGE 1 OF 27 CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL THE FOLLOWING CONDITIONS SHALL BE SATISFIED PRIOR TO THE ISSUANCE OF SITE PERMITS: Submit to the Planning Division ery sines,639-4171,ext. 2437) for review and approval: 1. Prior to site work the applicant shall submit a revised site plan for review and approval showing the walkway from the City Hall North parking lot to the sidewalk adjacent to Police headquarters marked with striping or contrasting pavement materials. 2. Prior to site work the applicant shall submit for review and approval a landscape plan showing the types,size and number of plantings to be installed. 3. If street trees are removed to meet site distance requirements, then street trees shall be replaced to meet the current standards, outside of the site distance line. A site plan showing the size and species of the proposed street trees shall be submitted for review and approval prior to planting. 4. Prior to site/building permit issuance the applicant shall provide a plan for review and approval that shows the minimum parking requirements are being met byprovidin an additional 17 parking spaces. These spaces shall not be further than 500 feet from the primary site (IDC 18.765.030.B). 5. The applicant shall provide for review and approval a detail of the bike racks to be used. 6. Tree Protection - Prior to any site work the applicant shall install all pproposed tree protection fencing. The fencing shall be inspected and approved by the Project Arbonst and City Planner (Cheryl Gaines) prior to commencing any site work The tree protection fencing shall remain in place through the duration of all of the building construction phases, until the Certificate of Occupancy has been approved. 7. Prior to issuance of building permits, the applicant shall submit site plan drawings indicating the location of the trees that were preserved on the lot during site development, location of tree protection fencing,and a signature of approval from the project arborist regarding the placement and construction techniques to be employed in building the structures. All proposed protection fencing shall be installed and inspected pnor to commencing construction. The fencing shall remain in place through the duration of all of the building construction phases, until the Certificate of Occupancy has been approved. After approval from the City Forester, the tree protection measures may be removed. 8. The applicant shall have an on-going responsibility to ensure that the Project Arborist has submitted written reports to the Planning Department (Cheryl Caines), at least once every two weeks, as the Project Arborist monitors the construction activities from initial tree protection zone (IPZ) fencing installation through the buildin construction phases. The reports shall evaluate the condition and location of the tree protection fencing,determine if any changes occurred to the TPZ and if any part of the Tree Protection Plan has been violated. If the amount of TPZ was reduced, then the Project Arborist shall justify why the fencing was moved and shall certify that the construction activities did not adversely impact the overall, long-term health and stability of the tree(s). If the reports are not submitted to the City at the scheduled intervals, and if it appears the TPZ's or the Tree Protection Plan are not being followed by the contractor or a sub-contractor, the City can stop work on the project until an inspection can be done by City Staff and the Project Arborist. Prior to issuance of any Certificates of Occupancy, the Project Arborist will submit a final certification indicating the elements of the Tree Protection Plan were followed and that all remaining trees on the site are healthy,stable,and viable in their modified growing environment. 9. When Hall Boulevard is widened,the current visual clearance requirements shall be met unless a Site Distance Certification is provided that shows the site distance requirements can be met. NOTICE OF TYPE II DECISION SDR2006-00005/TIGARD SKATE PARK PAGE 2 OF 27 Submit to the Engineering Department (Kim McMillan, 639-4171, ext. 2642) for review and approval: 10. A Public Facility Improvement (PFI) permit is required for this project to cover driveway improvements on Burnham Street and any other work in the public right-of-way. Three (3) sets of detailed public improvement plans shall be submitted for review to the Engineering Department. NOTE:these plans are in addition to any drawings required by the Building Division and should only include sheets relevant to public improvements. Public Facility Improvement (PH)permit plans shall conform to City of Tigard-Public Improvement Design Standards,which are availabble at City Hall and the City's web page (www.tigard-or.gov). 11. The PFI permit plan submittal shall include the exact legal name, address and telephone number of the individual or corporate entity who will be designated as the "Permittee", and who will provide the financial assurance for the public improvements. For example, specify if the entity is a corporation limited partnership, LLC, etc. Also specify the state within which the entity is incorporated and provide the name of the corporate contact person. Failure to provide accurate information to the Engineering Department will delay processing of project documents. 12. Prior to issuance of permits, the applicant's engineer shall submit additional information regarding sight distance from the main City IE[1 driveway on Hall Boulevard and show how much sight distance will be improved with the trimming or removal of vegetation and street trees on the inside of the horizontal curve of Hall Boulevard. If the tnmm;ng and removal of vegetation improve intersection sight distance the applicant will be required to do so prior to final inspection. 13. Prior to issuance of permits, the applicant shall submit a traffic circulation and signage plan that encourages skate park traffic to use the Burnham Street access. 14. Prior to issuance of permits, the applicant shall explore any option for a shared access on Burnham Street with the adjacent parcel or place the driveway as far from the intersection as possible. 15. Prior to issuance of permits,the applicant shall apply for and receive approval of an adjustment to the spacing standard for the two driveways in accordance with the spacing standard of 18.7'05.030.1.3 and the variance and adjustment standards of 18.370. 16. The applicant shall provide a construction vehicle access and parking plan for approval by the City Engineer. The purpose of this plan is for parking and traffic control during the public improvement construction phase. The parking and access aisles outside the footprint of the skate park cannot be used for staging or parking by the contractors throughout this project. 17. Prior to issuance of permits, additional right-of-way shall be conveyed to the State of Oregon, by and through its Department of Transportation,Highway Division,along the frontage of Hall Boulevard to increase the right-of-way to 52 feet from centerline. The description shall be tied to the existing right- of-way centerline. Verification that the conveyance has been submitted to the State shall be provided to the City Engineering Department. (For additional information, contact Martin Abero, Oregon Department of Transportation, Right-of-Way Section, 123 NW Flanders, Portland, OR 97209-4037; Phone: 731-8425). 18. Prior to issuance of permits,additional right-of-way shall be dedicated to the Public along the frontage of Burnham Street to increase the right-of-way to 37.5 feet from the centerline. The description sh be tied to the existing right-of-way centerline. The dedication document shall be on City forms. Instructions are available from the Engineering Department. 19. Prior to issuance of permits,the applicant shall obtain an ODOT Miscellaneous Permit from the State of Oregon H'Ighway Division,to perform work within the right-of-way of Hall Boulevard. A copy of the permit shall be provided to the City Engineering Department. 20. Final design plans and calculations for the_proposed private water quality facility shall be submitted to the Engineering Department (Kim McMillan) and ODOT for review and approval. Final approval will be part of the ODOT Drainage Permit, which must be issued prior to issuance of any City permits. NOTICE OF TYPE II DECISION SDR2006-00005/TIGARD SKATE PARK PAGE 3 OF 27 21. The applicant is required to contact ODOT to determine if a drainage study is required for connection to the Laity in Hall Boulevard. 22. ODOT drainage Permit is required for connection to state highway drainage facilities. 23. An erosion control plan shall be provided as part of the Site Permit drawings. The plan shall conform to the "Erosion Prevention and Sediment Control Design and Planning Manual, February 2003 edition." THE FOLLOWING CONDITIONS SHALL BE SATISFIED PRIOR TO FINAL BUILDING INSPECTION: Submit to the Planning Division(Cheryl Gaines, 639-4171,ext. 2437) for review and approval: 24. The applicant/owner shall amend the Tigard Municipal code (7.52.100) to prohibit the possession, control or consumption of alcoholic beverages in Tigard Skate Park 25. A separate sign permit will be required for all tenant signage prior to installation. 26. The applicant/owner shall record a deed restriction to the effect that any.existing tree greater than 12" diameter may be removed only if the tree dies or is hazardous according to a certified arborist. The deed restriction may be removed or will be considered invalid if a tree preserved in accordance with this decision should either die or be removed as a hazardous tree. Submit to the Engineering Department (Kim McMillan, 639-4171, ext. 2642) for review and approval: 27. Prior to a final inspection, the applicant shall complete any work in the public right-of-way and obtain approval from ODOT and the City of Tigard Engineering Department. 28. If the applicant proposes to provide lighting or other electrical services to the skate ark they shall pay the fee in-lieu of under grounding. The fee shall be calculated by the frontage of-the site that is parallel to the utility lines and will be $ 35.00 per lineal foot. 29. Prior to a final inspection,the applicant shall demonstrate that they have entered into a maintenance agreement with Stormwater Management, or another company that demonstrates they can meet the maintenance requirements of the manufacturer, for the proposed onsite storm water treatment facility. 30. Prior to final inspection, the applicant's engineer shall submit final sight distance certification for both driveways. THIS APPROVAL SHALL BE VALID FOR EIGHTEEN (18) MONTHS FROM THE EFFECTIVE DATE OF THIS DECISION. SECTION III. BACKGROUND INFORMATION Site History: Staff conducted a search of City records for the subject property. Land use applications related to on-site work include construction,expansion and remodel the existing buildings. These include a Conditional Use Permit to allow a Department of Motor Vehicles office within an industrial zone CU 18-76), construction of an office/warehouse building to be used by an electrical contractor (SDR24-7 , and redevelopment of the site for the City Hall complex (SDR91-0017). No other land use cases were ound to be on file with the City besides some temporary sign permits. NOTICE OF TYPE II DECISION SDR2006-00005/TIGARD SKATE PARK PAGE 4 OF 27 Vicinity Information: The subject site is located at the intersection of Hall Boulevard and Burnham Street. The property is zoned CBD with properties to the north and east also zoned CBD. Properties to the east across Hall Blvd. are zoned Light Industrial. To the south of the City Hall complex across Fanno Creek is residential zoning (R- 12). Surrounding properties are developed with a mix of commercial, industrial, municipal and residential uses. Site Information and Proposal Description: The applicant is requesting Site Development Review to construct a 15,000 square foot skate park facility on the City Hall complex. There are five existing buildings on the site (City Hall &Police, Permit Center the Niche and two modular offices). The new skate park will effect existing parking and landscape areas of the site. Few other changes are proposed to the existing conditions. SECTION IV. COMMENTS FROM PROPERTY OWNERS WITHIN 500 FEET E-mail correspondence was received during the comment period for the Skate Park (SDR2006-00005) from Joanne Zimmer and Ted Hedlund, neighboring residents. Their concerns included alcohol use in Tigard parks, increased number of strangers within the adjacent neighborhoods, increased crime, noise, and traffic congestion. They indicated they believe these things lead to depressed home values. The City has adopted an Ordinance prohibiting drinking in Fanno Creek Park, Liberty Park, Main Street Park and Commercial Park. The applicant shall request an amendment to the Tigard Municipal Code (7.52.100) to also include the Skate Park facility (Condition #24). Rules will be posted at the Skate Park. These include no alcohol, drugs or boom boxes/radios and no trespassing on private property. The park is located within the City Hall parking lot and is only open during daylight hours. The park is not supervised like most park facilities. Crimes ically occur in secluded areas. This sites proximity to the City Hall/Police and a busy arterial (Hall Boulevard) make it highly visible to citizens and staff in the area. Many people associate skateboarding with gangs and crime, but the typical skate park user will only be at the park to skate. The skating community is typically self-monitoring. The skaters take turns and look out for one another so no injuries happen. Planning Staff has done some Internet research on the impacts of skate parks on surrounding communities. There are incidents of crime within skate parks, just like in all types of parks, but many articles/studies speak to the positive social impacts of skate parks by bringing people together with a common cause. At this time there is no conclusive evidence that skate parks have negative impacts on surrounding communities. SECTION V. SUMMARY OF APPLICABLE REVIEW CRITERIA The proposal's consistency with these Code Chapters is reviewed in the following sections: A. Zoning Districts 18.50 Commercial Zoning Districts B. Applicable Development Code Standards 18.705 Access Egress and Circulation 18.725 Environmental Performance Standards 18.745 Landscaping and Screening 18.755 Mixed Solid /aste and Recyclable Storage 18.765 Off-Street parking and loading requirements 18.780 Signs 18.790 Tree Removal 18.795 Visual Clearance C. Specific SDR Approval Criteria 18.360 D. Street and Utility Improvement Standards 18.810 E. Decision Making Procedures 18.390 Impact Study NOTICE OF TYPE II DECISION SDR2006-00005/TIGARD SKATE PARK PAGE 5 OF 27 SECTION VI. APPLICABLE DEVELOPMENT CODE STANDARDS A. ZONING DISTRICTS Commercial Zoning District Section 18.520.020 Lists the description of the Commercial Zoning Districts. The site is located in the CBD: Central Business District. The proposed use, community recreation is outright permitted in the zone. The present use of the site is a mix of Emergency Services (Police) and Office (City Hall). The City Hall building houses the public meeting room, Town Hall. This room is used for court, City Council and Planning Commission meetings, and public hearings and is available for rent by the public. Assembly room facilities are not classified as a separate use in the code, but the use is similar to religious facilities. Development Standards: Section 18.520.040.B States that development standards in commercial zoning districts are contained in Table 18.520.2 below: TABLE 18.520.2 DEVELOPMENT STANDARDS IN COMMERCIAL ZONES STANDARD GG Proposed Minimum Lot Size None N/A Minimum Lot Width None N/A Minimum Setbacks - Front yard 0/30 ft[n 160 ft - Side facing street on corner&through lots 0/30 ft[,J 1 ft - Side yard 0/30 ft[,] 390 ft - Rear yard 0/30 ft[1] 285 ft - Distance between front of garage &property line abutting - N/A a public or private street. Maximum Height 80 ft[2] 8 ft Maximum Site Coverage 85% 52% Minimum Landscape Requirement 15% 48% [1]No setback shall be required except 30 feet shall be required where the zone abuts a residential zoning district. [2]Maximum height of any building within 100 feet of any residential zoning district shall not exceed 40 feet. As demonstrated in the table above, the proposal complies with the underlying zone development standards. These standards were generally addressed by the applicant, but actual figures were calculated by Planning Staff. Measurements generally setbacks were taken from the proposed site plan. Landscape and site coverage percentages were estimated by reviewing City aerial photographs. Because part of the site is comprised of Fanno Creek Park, the landscaping standard is greatly exceeded. The proposed changes include the removal and addition of landscaping areas. The site abuts a residential zone to the south,but the proposed skate park complies with the 30 foot required setback because the setback is approximately 285 feet. FINDING: Based on the analysis above,the underlying zoning district standards have been fully met. B. APPLICABLE DEVELOPMENT CODE STANDARDS The Site development Review approval standards require that a development proposal be found to be consistent with the various standards of the Community Development Code. The applicable criteria in this case are Chapters 18.360, 18.370, 18.390, 18.530, 18.705,18.745, 18.755, 18.765, 18.775 18.780, 18.790, 18.795, and 18.810. The proposal's consistency with these Code Chapters is reviewed in the following sections. NOTICE OF TYPE II DECISION SDR2006-00005/TIGARD SKATE PARK PAGE 6 OF 27 Access,Egress and Circulation(18.705): Access plan: No building or other permit shall be issued until scaled plans are presented and approved as provided by this chapter that show how access, egress and circulation requirements are to be fulfilled. The applicant shall submit a site plan. The Director shall provide the applicant with detailed information about this submission requirement. The applicant has provided plans showing access from Hall Boulevard and Burnham Street. The driveway from Burnham will be utilized as the main access point. Joint access: Owners of two or more uses, structures, or parcels of land may agree to utilize jointly the same access and egress when the combined access and egress of both uses, structures, or parcels of land satisfies the combined requirements as designated in this title, provided: Satisfactory-legal evidence shall be presented in the form of deeds,easements, leases or contracts to establish the joint use; and copies of the deeds,easements, leases or contracts are placed on permanent file with the City. The proposed facility shares access with the other existing uses of the City Hall complex. Because all the uses are City facilities,no shared access agreement is required. Public street access: All vehicular access and egress as required in Sections 18.705.030H and 18.705.030I shall connect directly with a public or pnvate street approved by the City for public use and shall be maintained at the required standards on a continuous basis. The proposed building will be accessible from Burnham Street and Hall Boulevard,which will be maintained as public streets. Therefore,this criterion has been satisfied. Curb cuts: Curb cuts shall be in accordance with Section 18.810.030N: Concrete curbs, curb cuts, wheelchair, bicycle ramps and driveway approaches shall be constructed in accordance with standards specified in this chapter and Section 15.0F4.080: Concrete curbs and driveway approaches are required, except where no sidewalk is planned,an asphalt approach may be constructed with City Engineer approval and Asphalt and concrete driveway approaches to the property line shall be built to City configuration standards. Because the park will utilize existing access drives,no curb cuts are proposed with this application. Walkways: 18.705.030(F) requires that on-site pedestrian walkways comply with the following standards: Walkways shall extend from the ground floor entrances or from the ground floor landing of stairs, ramps, or elevators of all commercial, institutional, and industrial uses, to the streets which provide the required access and egress. Walkways shall provide convenient connections between buildings in multi-building commercial, institutional, and industrial complexes. Unless impractical, walkways shall ix constructed between new and existing developments and neighboring developments; Existing sidewalks connect the parking areas and buildings on-site. New walkways will extend from the Skate Park entrance to the adjacent parking area. Wherever required walkways cross vehicle access driveways or parking lots, such crossings shall be designed and located for pedestrian safety. Required walkways shall be physically separated from motor vehicle traffic and parking by either a minimum 6-inch vertical separation (curbed) or a minimum 3-foot horizontal separation, except that pedestrian crossings of traffic aisles are permitted for distances no greater than 36 feet if appropriate landscaping, pavement markings or contrasting pavement materials are used. Walkways shall be a minimum of four feet in width exclusive of vehicle overhangs and obstructions such as mailboxes, benches, bicycle racks, and sign posts, and shall be in compliance with ADA standards; NOTICE.OF TYPE II DECISION SDR2006-00005/TIGARD SKATE PARK PAGE 7 OF 27 The existing crossing between the City Hall North lot and the walkway by the Police headquarters has no markings to designate this as a pedestrian crossing. None of the proposed walkways cross an access drive. A condition will ensure the existing crossing meets current standards. FINDING: Not all walkways crossing vehicle access driveways are marked for pedestrian safety. Required walkways shall be paved with hard surfaced materials such as concrete, asphalt, stone, brick, etc. Walkways may be required to be lighted and/or signed as needed for safety purposes. Soft-surfaced public use pathways may be provided only if such pathways are provided in addition to required pathways. Walkways will be paved with concrete and lighted to ensure pedestrian safety. Access Management: Section 18.705.030.H.1 states that an access report shall be submitted with all new development proposals which verifies design of driveways and streets are safe by meeting adequate stacking needs, sight distance and deceleration standards as set by ODOT, Washington County, the City and AASHTO. Lancaster Engineering has provided preliminary intersection sight distance measurements in a memo to the applicant dated October 2, 2006. The sight distance was measured at the two existing driveways that serve the site. rIhe driveway on Burnham Street requires a minimum sight distance of 335 feet, based on a posted speed of 30 mph. The engineer states that the available sight distance to the west is unrestricted and the required minimum of 335 feet of sight distance is available. To the east the signalized intersection of Burnham Street and hall Boulevard is clearly visible. Burnham Street terminates at its Hall Boulevard with a T-intersection. The posted speed on Hall Boulevard north of the driveway on Hall Boulevard is 30 mph while the speed zone transitions to 40 mph immediately south of the driveway location. The engineer states that the sight distance to the south meets the minimum required 445 feet of sight distance. To the north the line of sight is restricted by vegetation and street trees on the inside of the horizontal curve of Hall Boulevard. Intersection sight distance was measured to be approximately 280 feet which does not meet the requirements for intersection sight distance. The engineer points out that when intersection sight distance is not available stopping sight distance is commonly examined. Stopping sight distance is considered the minimum measure for sale operation, since it is the minimum distance necessary for an oncoming driver to see an object in the travel lane and come to a complete stop if necessary to avoid a collision. For southbound traffic on Hall Boulevard approaching the main City Hal driveway,the stopping sight distance requirement is 200 feet based on the posted speed of 30 mph. Due to the horizontal curve and proximity of the traffic signal, actual travel speeds may be reduced somewhat,which would reduce the sight distance needed at the driveway. The engineer recommends that given the limited sight distance to the north from the main City Hall driveway, one option for traffic circulation would be to encourage the use of the Burnham Street access for skate park traffic. By providing this second access to serve traffic from the skate park additional traffic on the main City Hall access can be minimized. Prior to issuance of permits, the applicant's engineer shall submit additional information regarding.sight distance from the main City Hall driveway and how the sight distance will be improved with the trimming or removal of vegetation and street trees on the inside of the horizontal curve of Hall Boulevard. It is not typical to approve stopping sight distance in-lieu of intersection sight distance when there are measures that can be taken to improve intersection sight distance. Intersection sight distance must be maximized and then stopping sight distance may be considered. The recommended trimming or removal of vegetation and trees e required by the applicant prior to final inspection. Prior to issuance of permits, the apPlicant shall submit a traffic circulation and signage plan that encourages skate park traffic to use the Blum Street access. This plan shall be submitted to the Engineering Department for review and approval. Prior to final inspection the applicant's engineer shall submit final sight distance certification for both driveways. NOTICE OF TYPE II DECISION SDR2006-00005/TIGARD SKATE PARK PAGE 8 OF 27 Section 18.705.030.H.2 states that driveways shall not be permitted to be placed in the influence area of collector or arterial street intersections. Influence area of intersections is that area where queues of traffic commonly form on approach to an intersection. The minimum driveway setback from a collector or arterial street intersection shall be 150 feet, measured from the right-of-way line of the intersecting street to the throat of the proposed driveway. The setback may be greater depending upon the influence area, as determined from City Engineer review of a traffic impact report submitted by the applicant's traffic engineer. In a case where a project has less than 150 feet of street frontage, the applicant must explore any option for shared access with the adjacent parcel. If shared access is not possible or practical,the driveway shall be placed as far from the intersection as possible. The applicant did not address this section. The access on Burnham Street is only 117 feet from Hall Boulevard and after ROW dedication to ODOT will be 87 feet from the intersection. This clearly falls within the influence area of an arterial street intersection. The frontage along Burnham Street is approximately 165 feet, but will only be 135 feet in length after ROW dedication to ODOT. Therefore, prior to issuance of permits the applicant must explore any option for a shared access with the adjacent parcel or place the driveway as far from the intersection as possible. Section 18.705.030.H.3 and 4 states that the minimum spacing of driveways and streets along a collector shall be 200 feet. The minimum spacing of driveways and streets along an arterial shall be 600 feet. The minimum spacing of local streets along a local street shall be 125 feet. The driveway on Burnham Street is only 104 feet from the driveway to the west. Burnham Street is a Collector street requiring a minimum 200 feet spacing of driveways and streets. The driveway on Hall Boulevard is closer than 600 feet to several driveways and Burnham Street. Hall Boulevard is an Arterial requiring a minimum 600 feet spacing of driveways and streets. The applicant did not address this section and did not apply for an adjustment to this standard. Prior to issuance of permits the applicant shall apply for and receive approval of an adjustment to the spacing standard in accordance with 18.370. Minimum Access Requirements for Commercial and Industrial Use: Section 18.705.030.I provides the minimum access requirements for commercial and industrial uses: Table 18.705.3 indicates that the required access width for developments with more than 100 parking spaces is one 50-foot access with 40 feet of pavement or two 30-foot accesses with 24 feet of pavement. Vehicular access shall be provided to commercial or industrial uses, and shall be located within 50 feet of the primary ground floor entrances; additional requirements for truck traffic may be placed as conditions of site development review. The development will keep the two existing access points. Both access drives are approximately 30 feet wide with at least 24 feet of pavement. All buildings/structures on site have vehicular access within 30 feet of the primary floor entrances. FINDING: The access requirements can be met as conditioned below. CONDITION:Prior to site work the applicant shall submit a revised site plan for review and approval showing the walkway from the City Hall North parking lot to the sidewalk adjacent to Police headquarters marked with striping or contrasting pavement materials. Environmental performance standards (18.725): These standards require that federal and state environmental laws, rules and regulations be applied to development within the City of Tigard. Section 18.725.030 (Performance Standards) regulates: Noise,visible emissions,vibration and odors. Noise. For the purposes of noise regulation, the provisions of Sections 7.41.130 through 7.40.210 of the Tigard Municipal Code shall apply. NOTICE OF TYPE II DECISION SDR2006-00005/TIGARD SKATE PARK PAGE 9 OF 27 Visible Emissions. Within the commercial zoning districts and the industrial park (IP) zoning district, there shall be no use, operation or activity which results in a stack or other point- source emission, other than an emission from space heating, or the emission of pure uncombined water (steam) which is visible from a property line. Department of Environmental Quality(DEQ) rules for visible emissions (340-21-015 and 340-28-070) apply. Vibration. No vibration other than that caused by highway vehicles, trains and aircraft is permitted in any given zoning district which is discernible without instruments at the property line of the use concerned. Odors. The emissions of odorous gases or other matter in such quantities as to be readily detectable at any point beyond the property hne of the use creating the odors is prohibited. DEQ rules for odors (340-028-090) apply. Glare and heat. No direct or sky reflected glare, whether from floodlights or from high temperature processes such as combustion or welding, which is visible at the lot line shall be permitted, and; 1) there shall be no emission or transmission of heat or heated air which is discernible at the lot line of the source; and 2) these regulations shall not apply to signs or floodlights in parking areas or construction equipment at the time of construction or excavation work otherwise permitted by this title. Insects and rodents. All materials including wastes shall be stored and all grounds shall be maintained in a manner which will not attract or aid the propagation of insects or rodents or create a health hazard. This is a community recreation use, which is permitted outright within the CBD zone. The applicant has indicated that the noise generated by the facility will be miiumal. Even if the sound limits are exceeded there is an exception for such activity within the Tigard Municipal Code section 7.40.180: Non-amplified sounds created by organized athletic or other roup activities, when such activities are conducted on property generally used for such urposes such as stadiums, parks, schools, and athletic fields, during normal hours for such events. There will be no known or expected emissions, vibrations or odors generated by the skate park. No lighting is provided because the park will only be open during daylight hours. All waste will be stored in proper containers as not to attract rodents or insects. Garbage cans with enclosures are proposed for the park. Ongoing maintenance to meet these standards shall be maintained and any violation of these standards will be addressed by the City of Tigard's'Code Enforcement Officer. FINDING: The Environmental Performance Standards are satisfied. Landscaping and Screening (18.745): 18.745.030.C,Installation Requirements The installation of all landscaping shall be as follows: All landscaping shall be installed according to accepted planting procedures. The accepted planting procedures are the guidelines described in the Tigard Tree Manual. These guidelines follow those set forth by the International Society of Arboriculture (ISA) tree planting guidelines as well as the standards set forth in the American Institute of Architects' Architectural Graphic 10th Standards, 10 edition. In the Architectural Graphic Standards there are guidelines for selecting and planting trees based on the soil volume and size at maturity. Additionally, there are directions for soil amendments and modifications. In order to develop tree species diversity onsite the following guidelines shall be followed: • No more than 30% of any one family be planted onsite. • No more than 20% of any one genus be planted onsite. • No more than 10% of any one species be planted onsite. The plant material shall be of high grade, and shall meet the size and grading standards of the Amencan Standards for Nurberg Stock (ANSI Z-60, 1-1986, and any other future revisions); and landscaping shall be installed in accordance with the provisions of this title. Certificate of Occupancy. Certificates of occupancy shall not be issued unless the landscaping requirements have been met or other arrangements have been made and approved by the City such as the posting of a bond. NOTICE OF TYPE II DECISION SDR2006-00005/TIGARD SKATE PARK PAGE 10 OF 27 Pursuant to findings in 18.790.030.B below,tree mitigation will not be required. Protection of Existing Landscaping. Existing vegetation on a site shall be protected as much as possible: 1. The developer shall provide methods for the protection of existing vegetation to remain during the construction process; and 2. The plants to be saved shall be noted on the landscape plans (e.g., areas not to be disturbed can be fenced, as in snow fencing which can be placed around the individual trees). The applicant shall establish fencing as directed by the project arborist to rotect the trees to be retained. Tree protection fencing is described in the Arborist Report as orange snow fencing placed one foot for every inch of trunk diameter. For exa le, a 14-inch tree will have a tree protection zone of 14 feet from the face of the trunk The applicant shallow access by the City Staff for the purpose of monitoring nd inspection of the tree protection to verify that the tree protection measures are performing adequately. Failure to follow the plan, or maintain tree protection fencing in the designated locations shall be grounds for immediate suspension of work on the site until remediation measures and/or civil citations can be processed. Street Trees: Section 18.745.040 states that all development projects fronting on a public street or a private drive more than 100 feet in length shall be required to plant street trees in accordance with Section 18.745.040.C. Section 18.745.040.0 requires that street trees be spaced between 20 and 40 feet apart depending on the size classification of the tree at maturity(small,medium or large). Street trees already exist along both street frontages. Per the preliminary site distance prepared by Lancaster Engineering these trees interfere with s' ht distance to the north. In order to alleviate this problem, the engineer suggests trimming or removal of-vegetation,which may include street trees. FINDING: Removal of street trees may take the development out of compliance with the standards. Buffering and Screening: Section 18.745.080 states that no buffer is required between abutting uses that are of a different type when the uses are separated by a street. No buffer is required between a proposed office use and existing office use. Buffering and/or screening are required for dissimilar uses. The site is bordered by commercial uses to the west and streets to the north and east. Residential properties border the City Hall complex to the south, but the Permit Center building, greenway and Fanno Creek lie between the proposed park and the residences. In addition these homes are approximately 600 feet south of the proposed-park No additional buffering is required for this proposal. Screening: Special Provisions: Section 18.745.050.E requires the screening of parking and loading areas. Landscaped parking areas shall include special design features which effectively screen the parking lot areas from view. Planting materials to be installed should achieve a relative balance between low lying and vertical shrubbery and trees. Trees shall be planted in landscaped islands in all parking areas, and shall be equally distributed on the basis of one (1) tree for each seven(7) parking_spaces in order to provide a canopy effect. The minimum dimension on the landscape islands sha-1113e three (3) feet wide and the landscaping shall be protected from vehicular damage by some form of wheel guard or curb. The site has existing landscaping along the edges of the parking areas. New landscaping is being added between the proposed skate park and the existing parking area. No details were given about the type of plantings to be used. Trees proposed within the modified parking areas are equ2llydistributed. FINDING: Staff is unable to determine if the proposed landscaping includes a mix of low lying and vertical plantings. NOTICE OF TYPE II DECISION SDR2006-00005/TIGARD SKATE PARK PAGE 11 OF 27 Screenin Of Service Facilities. Except for one-family and two-family dwellings, any refuse container or disposal area and service facilities such as gas meters and air conditioners which would otherwise be visible from a public street, customer or resident parking area, any public facility or any residential area shall be screened from view by placement of a solid wood fence or masonry wall between five and eight feet in height. All refuse materials shall be contained within the screened area; No new service facilities are proposed with this application. This standard is not applicable. Screening Of Refuse Containers. Except for one- and two-family dwellings, any refuse container or refuse collection area which would be visible from a public street, parking lot, residential or commercial area, or any public facility such as a school or park shall be screened or enclosed from view by placement of a solid wood fence, masonry wall or evergreen hedge. All refuse shall be contained within the screened area. No new refuse collection areas are illp roposed with this application, but garbage cans are proposed to be placed within the park These wmost likely be 32 gallon cans with enclosures. The applicant has provided photos of the enclosures. This standard has been met. FINDING: Based on the analysis above,the landscaping and screening standards have not been fully met. If the applicant complies with the condition listed below,the standards will be met. CONDITIONS: • Prior to site work the applicant shall submit for review and approval a landscape plan showing the types,size and number of plantings to be installed. • If street trees are removed to meet site distance requirements then street trees shall be replaced to meet the current standards, outside of the site distance line. A site plan showing the size and species of the proposed street trees shall be submitted for review and approval. Mixed Solid Waste and Recyclables Storage (18.755): Chapter 18.755 requires that new construction incorporates functional and adequate space for on-site storage and efficient collection of mixed solid waste and source separated Recyclables prior to pick- up and removal by haulers. The applicant must choose one (1) of the following four (4) methods to demonstrate compliance: Minimum Standard, Waste Assessment, Comprehensive Recycling Plan, or Franchised Hauler Review and Sign-Off. The applicant will have to submit evidence or a plan which indicates compliance with this section. Regardless of which method chosen,the applicant will have to submit a wntten sign-off from the franchise hauler regarding the facility location and compatibility. Location Standards. To encourage its use, the storage area for source-separated recyclables shall be co-located with the storage area for residual mixed solid waste; Indoor and outdoor storage areas shall comply with Uniform Building and Fire Code requirements; Storage area space requirements can be satisfied with a single location or multiple locations, and can combine both interior and exterior locations; Exterior storage areas can be located within interior side yard or rear yard areas. Exterior storage areas shall not be located within a required front yard setback or in a yard adjacent to a public or private street; Exterior storage areas shall be located in central and visible locations on a site to enhance security for users; Exterior storage areas can be located in a parking area, if the proposed use provides at feast the minimum number of parking spaces required for the use after deducting the area used for storage. Storage areas shall be appropriately screened according to the provisions in 18.755.050 C, design standards; The storage area shall be accessible for collection vehicles and located so that the storage area will not obstruct pedestrian or vehicle traffic movement on the site or on public streets adjacent to the site. NOTICE OF TYPE II DECISION SDR2006-00005/TIGARD SKATE PARK PAGE 12 OF 27 Design Standards. The dimensions of the storage area shall accommodate containers consistent with current methods of local collection; Storage containers shall meet Uniform Fire Code standards and be made and covered with waterproof materials or situated in a covered area; Exterior storage areas shall be enclosed by a sight-obscuring fence wall, or hedge at least six feet in height. Gate openings which allow access to users and haulers shall be provided. Gate openings for haulers shall be a minimum of 10 feet wide and shall be capable of being secured in a closed and open position; Storage area(s) and containers shall be clearlylabeled to indicate the type of materials accepted. No changes are proposed to the storage areas for Mixed Solid Waste and Recyclable storage. FINDING: The Mixed Solid Waste and Recyclable Storage standards are not applicable. Off-Street Parking and Loading(18.765): Location of vehicle parking: Off-street parking spaces for single-family and duplex dwellings and single-family attached dwellings shall be located on the same lot with the dwellings. OfFstreet parking lots for uses not listed above shall be located not further than 200 feet from the building or use that they are required to serve, measured in a straight line from the building with the following exceptions: a) commercial and industrial uses which require more than 40 parking spaces may provide for the spaces in excess of the required first 40 spaces up to a distance of 300 feet from the primary site; The 40 parking spaces which remain on the primary site must be available for users in the following order of priority: 1) Disabled-accessible spaces; 2) Short-term spaces; 3) Long-term preferential carpool and vanpool spaces; 4) Long-term spaces. The parking lots associated with this project are directly adjacent to the proposed skate park, in compliance with this standard. Joint Parking: Owners of two or more uses, structures or parcels of land may agree to utilize jointly the same parking and loading spaces when the peak hours of operation do not overlay, subject to the following: 1) The size of the oint parking facility shall be at least as large as the number of vehicle parking spaces required by the larger(est) use per Section 18.765.070; 2) Satisfactory legal evidence shall be presented to the Director in the form of deeds, leases or contracts to establish the joint use; 3) If a oint use arrangement is subsequently terminated, or if the uses change, the requirements of this title thereafter apply to each separately. Shared parking already exists between the different uses found on the City Hall site (Permit Center,City Hall, the Niche and Police). In addition to parking for these uses, there are 16 overflow spaces reserved for the Tigard Library. These overflow spaces were approved through Conditional Use Permit (CUP2003-00001) and must be considered in the City Hall parking until they are provided for at another location. All the uses are associated with the City of Tigard and therefore a joint parking agreement is not necessary.. The minimum number of parking spaces required for this development is based on a mixed use project as outlined below. Parking in Mixed-Use Projects: In mixed-use projects, the required minimum vehicle parking shall be determined using the following formula. 1) Primary use, i.e., that with the largest proportion of total floor area within the development, at 100% of the minimum vehicle parking required for that use in Section 18.765.060; 2) Secondary use, i.e., that with the second Fargest percentage of total floor area within the development, at 90% of the vehicle parking required for that use in Section 18.765.060; 3) Subsequent use or uses, at 80% of the vehicle parking required for that use(s) in Section 18.765.060; 4) The maximum parking allowance shall be 150% of the total minimum parking as calculated above. NOTICE OF TYPE II DECISION SDR2006-00005/TIGARD SKATE PARK PAGE 13 OF 27 Minimum Based on Minimum Parking Use Total Square Footage Table 18.765.2 Requirement Office (100%) 29,900 2.7/1,000 sq.ft. 81 Community creation(90%) 15,000 2.0/1,000 sq.ft. 27 Emergency Services (80%) 11,000 3.0/1,000 sq.ft. 27 Town Hall(80%) 90[1] 1.0/3 seats 24 Total N/A N/A 159 [1]Based on the maximum capacity allowed for room reservation Town Hall has a maximum capacity of 195 based on the Uniform Building Code. The minimum parking requirement for the development is 159. Maximum at 150% of the minimum is 248 parking spaces. Minimum parking is not met at this time. The applicant has proposed alleviating the shortage by limiting the times Town Hall is available for reservation. After 5 p.m most employees have left work and more spaces will be vacant. Limiting the room availability is not possible because it is used for Tigard Municipal Court. The applicant is short by 17 spaces and is being conditioned to provide those spaces within the area required by code (18.765.030.B.2). The calculations below reveal the shortage. Total Parking 222 Fleet Parking 64 Library Reserve Parking 16 Total Available Parking 142 Shortage 17 spaces FINDING: The minimum parking requirements are not met as proposed. Even if the minimum parking requirements are met, par-king may.still be an issue on the site. City Hall functions much differently from many uses. There is a high demand for parking on the site. In addition to employees and fleet vehicles the lot also supplies parking for court, visitors to City Hall/Permit Center/Police and for meetings in Town Hall. Overflow parking for the Tigard Library is also provided on this site. Visitor Parking in Multi-Family Residential Developments: Multi-dwelling units with more than 10 required parking spaces shall provide an additional 15% of vehicle parking spaces above the minimum required for the use of guests of residents of the complex. These spaces shall be centrally located or distributed throughout the development. Required bicycle parking facilities shall also be centrally located within or evenly distributed throughout the development. This project does not involve a residential use. Therefore,this standard does not apply. Preferential Long-Term Carpool/Vanpool Parking: Parking lots providing in excess of 20 long-term parking spaces shall provide preferential long-term carpool and vanpool parking for employees, students and other regular visitors to the site. At least 5% of total long-term parking spaces shall be reserved for carpool/vanpool use. Preferential parking for carpools/vanpools shall be closer to the main entrances of the building than any other employee or student parking except parking spaces designated for use by the disabled. Preferential carpool/vanpool spaces shall be full-sized-per requirements in Section 18.765.040N and shall be clearly designated for use only by carpools and vanpools between 7:00 AM and 5:30 PM Monday through Friday . The required minimum long-term parking spaces based on square footage are 135. The Town Hall spaces are not included in this figure. Seven carpool/vanpool spaces are proposed. This meets the 5% requirement. These stalls will be located near the entrances to each building. This standard is met. Disabled-Accessible Parking: All parking areas shall be provided with the required number of parking spaces for disabled persons as specified by the State of Oregon Uniform Building Code and federal standards. Such parking spaces shall be sized, signed and marked as required by these regulations. NOTICE OF TYPE II DECISION SDR2006-00005/TIGARD SKATE PARK PAGE 14 OF 27 Based on the 2004 Oregon Structural Specialty Code the applicant must provide 7 accessible parking spaces. Only 6 are shown on the site plan. The applicant indicates that each space will be sized, signed and marked as required by law. Final determination of the number of required ADA spaces will be made by the building official during the review of the building permit application. As shown, the site plan does not comply with the ADA requirements. A condition will-ensure the requirements can be met. DEQ indirect source construction permit: All parking lots containing 250 spaces or parking structures containing two or more levels shall require review by the Oregon Department of Environmental Quality (DE to: 1. Acquire an Indirect Source Construction Permit; or 2. Investigate the feasibility of installing oil and grease separators There are only 222 spaces proposed for the parking area. This standard is not applicable. Access Drives: With regard to access to public streets from off-street parking: access drives from the street to off- streetparking or loading areas shall be designed and constructed to facilitate the flow of traffic and provide maximum safety for pedestrian and vehicular traffic on the site; the number and size of access drives shall be in accordance with the requirements of Chapter, 18.705 Access, Egress and Circulation• access drives shall be clearly and permanently marked and defined through use of rails, fences, walls or other barriers or markers on frontage not occupied by service drives; access drives shall have a minimum vision clearance in accordance with Chapter 18.795, Visual Clearance; access drives shall be improved with an asphalt or concrete surface; and excluding single-family and duplex residences, except as provided by Subsection 18.810.030.P, groups of two or more parking spaces shall be served by a service drive so that no backing movements or other maneuvering within a street or other public right-of-way will be required. The access drive has been addressed previously in this decision under Chapter 18.705 (Access, Egress and Circulation). Pedestrian Access: Pedestrian access through parking lots shall be provided in accordance with Section 18.705.030.F. Where a parking area or other vehicle area has a drop-off grade separation, the property owner shall install a wall, railing, or other barrier which will prevent a slow-moving vehicle or driverless vehicle from escaping such area and which will prevent pedestrians from walking over drop-off edges. There are no drop-off grade separated areas within the parking area. Parking Lot Striping: Except for single-family and duplex residences, any area intended to be used to meet the off-street parking requirements as contained in this Chapter shall have all parking spaces clearly marked; and all interior drives and access aisles shall be clearly marked and signed to show direction of flow and maintain vehicular and pedestrian safety. The plans submitted show the parking spaces are clearly marked with striping. Access aisles are clearly marked by landscape islands setting the direction of flow. There is a one-way access aisle with pavement markings. Wheel Stops: Parking spaces along the boundaries of a parking lot or adjacent to interior landscaped areas or sidewalks shall be provided with a wheel stop at least four inches high located three feet back from the front of the parking stall. The front three feet of the parking stall may be concrete, asphalt or low lying landscape material that does not exceed the height of the wheel stop. This area cannot be calculated to meet landscaping or sidewalk requirements. Curbing or wheel stops are provided along all landscaped areas or boundaries of the parking lot. This criterion has been met. NOTICE OF TYPE II DECISION SDR2006-00005/TIGARD SKATE PARK PAGE 15 OF 27 Space and Aisle Dimensions: Section 18.765.040.N states that: "except as modified for angled parking in Figures 18.765.1 and 18.765.2 the minimum dimensions for parking spaces are: 8.5 feet x 18.5 feet for a standard space and 7.5 feet x 16.5 feet for a compact space"; aisles accommodating two direction traffic, or allowing access from both ends, shall be 24 feet in width. No more than 50% of the required spaces may be compact spaces. Based on the site plan, most of the standard parking spaces measure 18.5 by 8.5 feet. Compact spaces measure 8 feet x [6.5 feet. All new aisles are 24 feet or greater in width to provide for two-way traffic flow, except the one-way aisles in the Niche parking lot. This area has angled parking which only requires an 11-foot aisle. The applicant has proposed a fifteen-foot aisle. Staff has scaled off from the site plans submitted to confirm that the existing parking layout meets the standards. Bicycle Parking Location and Access: Section 18.765.050 states bicycle parking areas shall be provided at locations within 50 feet of primary entrances to structures; bicycle parking areas shall not be located within parking aisles, landscape areas or pedestrian ways; outdoor bicycle parking shall be visible from on-site i buildings and/or the street. When the bicycle parking area is not visible from the street, directional signs shall be used to located the parking area; and bicycle parking may be located inside a building on a floor which has an outdoor entrance open for use and floor location which does not require the bicyclist to use stairs to gain access to the space. Exceptions may be made to the latter requirement for parking on upper stories within a multi-story residential building. Bicycle parking is provided near the entrances of the existing City Hall/Permit Center/Police. Additional bicycle parking is proposed within a landscape island between the Niche building.and the entrance to the skate park. All bicycle parking may not be visible from the street, but the parking_is provided in such close proximity to the building entrances that signage is not necessary. The racks are-located so pedestrian and vehicular traffic will not be impeded. Bicycle Parking Design Requirements: Section 18.765.050.C. The following design requirements apply to the installation of bicycle racks: The racks required for required bicycle parking spaces shall ensure that bicycles may be securely locked to them without undue inconvenience. Provision of bicycle lockers for long-term (employee) parking is encouraged but not required; bicycle racks must be securely anchored to the ground, wall or other structure; bicycle parking spaces shall be at least 21/2 feet by six feet long, and when covered, with a vertical clearance of seven feet. An access aisle of at least five feet wide shall be provided and maintained beside or between each row of bicycle parking; each required bicycle parking space must be accessible without moving another bicycle; required bicycle parking spaces may not be rented or leased except where required motor vehicle parking is rented or leased. At-cost or deposit fees for bicycle parking are exempt from this requirement; and areas set aside for required bicycle parking must be clearly reserved-for bicycle parking only. Outdoor bicycle parking facilities shalt be surfaced with a hard surfaced material, i.e., avers, asphalt, concrete or similar material. This surface must be designed to remain well drained. New bicycle parking is shown on the site plan near the entrance to the skate park facility. A 5-space, "wave" rack will be installed. The parking is not covered. Proposed surfacing is concrete. The location provides for easy access,but no detail of the bike rack was provided. Minimum Bicycle Parking Requirements: The total number of required bicycle parking spaces for each use is specified in Table 18.765.2 in Section 18.765.070.H. In no case shall there be less than two bicycle parking spaces. According to Table 18.765.2 of the Tigard Development Code, the minimum bicycle-parking requirement for a community recreation use is .3 spaces per 1,000 gross square feet. Five spaces are required for the park The applicant has proposed 5;therefore this standard has been met. Minimum Off-Street Parking; Section 18.765.070.H states that the minimum and maximum parking shall be as required in Table 18.765.2. NOTICE OF TYPE II DECISION SDR2006-00005/TIGARD SKATE PARK PAGE 16 OF 27 The minimum off-street parking requirements have been previously discussed under the Mixed Use Projects portion of this section. The minimum requirement has not been met, but the applicant is conditioned to show how the standards can be met. Off-Street Loading Spaces: Commercial, industrial and institutional buildings or structures to be built or altered which receive and distribute material or merchandise by truck shall provide and maintain off-street loading and maneuvering space as follows: A minimum of one loading space is required for buildings with 10,000 ross square feet or more; A minimum of two loading spaces for buildings with 40,000 gross square�eet or more. The applicant has proposed a new, 15,000 square foot skate park The total square footage of the buildings is 55,900. The uses within the City Hall project do not receive and distribute materials or merchandise on a regular basis. Regardless several short term spaces are available within the circular drive near the City Hall building. This standard has been met. FINDING: Based on the analysis above, the off-street parking and loading standards have not been completely met;as conditioned above the code requirements can be satisfied. CONDITIONS: Prior to site/building permit issuance the applicant shall provide a plan for review and approval that shows the minimum parking requirements are being met by providing an additional 17 arking spaces. These spaces shall not be further than 500 feet from the primary site (1 C 18.765.030.B). The applicant shall provide for review and approval a detail of the bike racks to be used. Signs (18.780): Chapter 18.780.130.0 lists the type of allowable signs and sign area permitted in the C-G Zoning District. There are no proposed signs with this application other than signs for designated parking and park hours. These signs are exempt from permit, so this section does not apply. If any signage is to be installed in the future,a sign permit is required. CONDITION: A separate sign permit will be required for all future signage prior to installation. Tree Removal(18.790): Section 18.790.030 requires a tree plan for the planting, removal and protection of trees prepared by a certified arborist shall be provided for any lot, parcel or combination of lots or parcels for which a development application for a subdivision,partition, site development review,.planned development or conditional use is filed. Protection is pre}erred over removal wherever possible. As required,the applicant submitted a tree plan conducted by Man Stine,a certified arborist and City Forester at the time of application. The report contains the four required components and is therefore acceptable. Plan requirements. The tree plan shall include the following: 1. Identification of the location, size and species of all existing trees including trees designated as significant by the city; The Arborist Report identified the location, size and species of all existing trees, consistent with this standard. 2. Identification of a program to save existing trees or mitigate tree removal over 12 inches in caliper. Mitigation must follow the replacement guidelines of Section 18.790.060D, in accordance with the following standards and shall be exclusive of trees required by other development code provisions for landscaping,streets and parking lots: NOTICE OF TYPE II DECISION SDR2006-00005/TIGARD SKATE PARK PAGE 17 OF 27 a. Retention of less than 25% of existing trees over 12 inches in caliper requires a mitigation program in accordance with Section 18.790.060D of no net loss of trees; b. Retention of from 25% to 50% of existing trees over 12 inches in caliper requires that two-thirds of the trees to be removed be mitigated in accordance with Section 18.790.060D; c. Retention of from 50% to 75% of existing trees over 12 inches in caliper requires that 50 percent of the trees to be removed be mitigated in accordance with Section 18.790.060D; d. Retention of 75% or greater of existing trees over 12 inches in caliper requires no mitigation. The applicant's tree removal plan indicates the trees on the property that are to remain and those proposed for removal. There are a total of 7 trees on site greater than 12 inches which are subject to mitigation. Three (3) trees are slated for removal, but none are over 12 inch dbh. Therefore, 100% of the trees will be retained. According to the mitigation schedule above,no mitigation is required. 3. Identification of all trees which are proposed to be removed; All of the trees proposed to be removed are identified in the applicant's survey and site plan. 4. A protection program defining standards and methods that will be used by the applicant to protect trees during and after construction. The guidelines for tree protection are outlined in the arborist report. 18.790.040 Incentives for Tree Retention B. Subsequent removal of a tree. Any tree preserved or retained in accordance with this section may thereafter be removed only for the reasons set out in a tree plan in accordance with Section 18.790.030, or as a condition of approval for a conditional use, and shall not be subject to removal under any other section of this chapter. The property owner shall record a deed restriction as a condition of approval of any development permit affected by this section to the effect that such tree may be removed only if the tree dies or is hazardous according to a certified arborist. The deed restriction may be removed or will be considered invalid if a tree preserved in accordance with this section should either die or be removed as a hazardous tree. The form of this deed restriction shall be subject to approval by the Director. A condition of approval will ensure that this standard is met. CONDITIONS: Tree Protection - Prior to any site work the applicant shall install all proposed tree protection fencing. The fencing shall be inspected and approved by the Project Arborist and City-Planner (Cher)1 Caines) prior to commencing any site work. Te tree protection fencing shall remain in place through the duration of all of the building construction phases,until the Certificate of Occupancy has been approved. Prior to issuance of building permits, the applicant shall submit site plan drawings indicating the location of the trees that were preserved on the lot during site development, location of tree protection fencing, and a signature of approval from the project arborist regarding the placement and construction techniques to be employed in building the structures. All proposed protection fencing _shall be installed and inspected prior to commencing construction. The fencing shall remain in place through the duration of all of the building construction phases, until the Certificate of Occupancy has been approved. After approval from the City Forester, the tree protection measures maybe removed. NOTICE OF TYPE II DECISION SDR2006-00005/TIGARD SKATE PARK PAGE 18 OF 27 The applicant shall have an on-going responsibility to ensure that the Project Arbonst has submitted written reports to the Planning Department Cheryl Caines), at least once every two weeks, as the Project Arbonst monitors the construction activities from initial tree protection zone 11'Z) fencing installation through the building construction phases. The reports shall evaluate the condition and location of the tree rotection fencing, determine if any changes occurred to the TPZ, and if any part of-the Tree Protection Plan has been violated. If the amount of TPZ was reduced then the Project Arborist shall justify why the fencing was moved and shall certify that the construction activities did not adversely impact the overall, long-term health and stability of the tree(s). If the reports are not submitted to the City at the scheduled intervals, and if it appears the Z's or the Tree Protection Plan are not being followed by the contractor or a sub-contractor, the City can stop_work on the project until an inspection can be done by City Staff and the Project Arborist. Prior to issuance of any certificates of Occupancy, the Project Arbonst will submit a final certification indicating the elements of- Tree Protection Plan were followed and that all remaining trees on the site are healthy, stable, and viable in their modified growing environment. Deed Restriction Prior to issuance of any Certificates of Occupancy, the applicant/owner shall record a deed restriction to the effect that any existing tree greater than 12" diameter maybe removed only if the tree dies or is hazardous according to a certified arborist. The deed restriction may be removed or will be considered-invalid if a tree preserved in accordance with this decision should either die or be removed as a hazardous tree. Visual Clearance Areas (18.795): Chapter 18.795 requires that a clear vision area shall be maintained on the cornets of all property adjacent to intersecting right-of-ways or the intersection of a public street and a private driveway. A clear vision area shalicontain no vehicle, hedge, planting, fence, wall structure, or temporary or permanent obstruction exceeding three (3) feet in height. The code provides that obstructions that may be located in this area shall be visually clear between three (3) and eight (8) feet in height (8) (trees may be placed within this area provided that all branches below eight 8) feet are removed). A visual clearance area is the triangular area formed by measuring a 30-foot distance along the street right-of-way and the driveway, and then connecting these two(2 ), 30-foot distance points with a straight line. Developments within the CBD zone are exempt from vision clearance requirements based on 18.795.030.A. This is because the development typically found in central business districts are pedestrian-oriented and designed to slow down traffic. In tfils particular case, the major access point to City Hall is onto SW Hall Boulevard, an arterial street. The vision clearance area is measured along the new right-of-way line. The proposed skate park wall and fence are within that area. If and when Hall Boulevard is widened, a hazardous traffic situation will be created. The drivers will need to creep onto the sidewalk and into the bike lane to determine if vehicles are approaching from the left. It will simply be dangerous for pedestrians as well as cars entering onto the street. In order to avoid this situation the portion of the skate park structure within the vision clearance area should be removed from the development plan at the time of widening Hall Boulevard. FINDING: The criterion has been met regarding visual clearance areas;but due to the future creation of a hazardous traffic situation, the vision clearance requirements will need to be met if and when Hall Boulevard is widened. CONDITION:When Hall Boulevard is widened,the current visual clearance requirements shall be met unless a Site Distance Certification is provided that shows the site distance requirements can be met. C. SPECIFIC SITE DEVELOPMENT REVIEW APPROVAL STANDARDS Section 18.360.090(A)(2) through 18.360.090(A)(15) provides additional Site Development Review approval standards not necessarily covered by the provisions of the previously listed sections. These additional standards are addressed immediately below with the following exceptions: The proposal contains no elements related to the provisions of the following and are,therefore, found to be inapplicable as approval standards: NOTICE OF TYPE II DECISION SDR2006-00005/TIGARD SKATE PARK PAGE 19 OF 27 18.360.090.3 (Multi Family Exterior Elevations); 18.360.090.5 (Privacy and Noise: Multi-family or Group Living Uses); 18.360.090.6 (Private Outdoor Areas: Multi-family Use); 18.360.090.7 (Shared Outdoor Recreation Areas: Multi-family Use); 18.360.090.8 (100-year floodplain); and 18.360.090.9 (Demarcation of Spaces). The following sections were discussed elsewhere in this decision and, therefore, will not be addressed in this section: 18.360.090.4 (Buffering, Screening and Compatibility Between Adjoining Uses; 18.360.090.13 (Parking); 18.360.090.14 (Landscaping); 18.360 in .090.15 (Drainage);and 18.360.090.14 (provision for the Disabled). Relationship to the Natural and Physical Environment: Buildings shall be: located to preserve existing trees, topography and natural drainage where possible based upon existing site conditions; located in areas not subject to ground slumping or sliding; located to provide adequate distance between adjoining buildings for adequate light, air circulation, and fire-fighting; and oriented with consideration for sun and wind. Trees shall be preserved to the extent possible. Replacement of trees is subject to the requirements of Chapter 18.790, Tree Removal. The proposed skate park location is proposed within an existing parking lot. Three existing landscape trees less than 12 inch caliper will be removed. All other trees on-site are being retained. This is not in an area identified as prone to sliding. The Soil Survey of Washington County, Oregon (United States Soil Conservation Service, 1982) indicates that surface soils consist of-Aloha Silt Loam. Tese soils are very deep and moderately to well-drained. There are no other buildings immediately adjacent to the skate park,adequate distance is provided for air circulation,light and fire-fighting. Demarcation of public,semi-public and private spaces for crime prevention: a.The structures and site improvements shall be designed so that public areas such as streets or public gathering places, semi-public areas and private outdoor areas are clearly defined to establish persons having a right to be in the space, to provide for crime prevention and to establish maintenance responsibility;and b. These areas may be defined by,but not limited to: 1 A deck,patio low wall,hedge,or draping vine; 2 A trellis or aiior; 3 A change in elevation or rade; 4 A change in the texture of the path material; 5 Sign; or 6 Landscaping The skate park will only be open during daylight hours. Hours and rules will be clearly marked. The perimeter of the park will be fenced to restrict access at night. Maintenance will be provided by the City's Public Works department. The Tigard Police headquarters is located on the site, which will also deter crime around the facility. Crime Prevention and Safety: Windows shall be located so that areas vulnerable to crime can be surveyed by the occupants; A. Interior laundry and service areas shall be located in a way that they can be observed by others; B. Mail boxes shall be located in lighted areas having vehicular or pedestrian traffic; C. The exterior lighting levels shall be selected and-the angles shall be oriented towards areas vulnerable to crime; and D. Light fixtures shall be provided in areas having heavy pedestrian or vehicular traffic and in potentially dangerous areas such as parking lots, stairs, ramps and abrupt grade changes. Fixtures shall be placed at a height so thatlight patterns overlap at a height of seven feet, which is sufficient to illuminate a person. No lighting plan was provided because the park will only be open during daylight hours. Existing lighting will illuminate the parking areas and other parts of the City Hall site. The Tigard Police Department was provided an opportunity to comment on the proposed development. The concerns are included under the staff comments section of this report. NOTICE OF TYPE H DECISION SDR2006-00005/TIGARD SKATE PARK PAGE 20 OF 27 Public Transit: Provisions within the plan shall be included for providing for transit if the development proposal is adjacent to an existing or proposed transit route; the requirements for transit facilities shall be based on: the location of other transit facilities in the area; and the size and type of the proposal. The following facilities may be required after City and Tri-Met review: bus stop shelters; turnouts for buses;and connecting paths to the shelters. The subject site is adjacent to an existing transit route (Tri-met route 76). The nearest bus stop is adjacent to the site on Hall Boulevard. A sidewalk is provided from the new facility to the public sidewalk along Hall Boulevard. No new facilities are proposed with this application. Tn-met was given an opportunity to comment on the proposed development and no responses were received. FINDING: Based on the analysis above,the Site Development Review standards have been satisfied. D. STREET AND UTILITY IMPROVEMENTS STANDARDS Chapter 18.810 provides construction standards for the implementation of public and private facilities and utilities such as streets,sewers,and drainage. The applicable standards are addressed below: Streets: Improvements: Section 18.810.030.A.1 states that streets within a development and streets adjacent shall be improved in accordance with the TDC standards. Section 18.810.030.A.2 states that any new street or additional street width planned as a portion of an existing street shall be dedicated and improved in accordance with the TDC. Minimum Rights-of-Way and Street Widths: Section 18.810.030.E requires an Arterial street to have a 104 right-of-way width and 36-foot paved section. Other improvements required may include on-street parking, sidewalks and bikeways, underground utilities, street lighting, storm drainage, and street trees. This site lies adjacent to SW Hall Boulevard, which is classified as an Arterial on the City of Tigard Transportation adjacent Map. At present, there is approximately 30 feet of ROW from centerline, according to the most recent tax assessor's map. The applicant should dedicate the additional ROW to ODOT to provide 52 feet of ROW from centerline for the entire frontage length of tax lots 2S102DA00400 and 2S102DA00401. Minimum Rights-of-Way and Street Widths: Section 18.810.030.E requires a Collector street to have a 74 right-of-way width and 23-foot paved section. Other improvements required may include on-street parking, sidewalks and bikeways, underground utilities, street lighting, storm drainage, and street trees. This site lies adjacent to SW Burnham Street, which is classified as a Collector on the City of Tigard Transportation adjacent Map. At present, there is approximately 20 feet of ROW from centerline, according to the most recent tax assessor s map. The applicant should dedicate the additional ROW to provide 37.5 feet from centerline plus the additional ROWpfor the radius at the intersection. Block Designs - Section 18.810.040.A states that the length, width and shape of blocks shall be designed with due regard to providing adequate building sites for the use contemplated consideration of needs for convenient access, circulation, control and safety of street traffic and recognition of limitations and opportunities of topography. Block Sizes: Section 18.810.040.B.1 states that the perimeter of blocks formed by streets shall not exceed 1,800 feet measured along the right-of-way line except: • Where street location is precluded by natural topography, wetlands or other bodies of water or,pre-existing development or, • For blocks adjacent to arterial streets, limited access highways,major collectors or railroads. • For non-residential blocks in which internal public circulation provides equivalent access. NOTICE OF TYPE II DECISION SDR2006-00005/TIGARD SKATE PARK PAGE 21 OF 27 The site is located near the intersection of a collector and an arterial. Due to existing commercial development in the area and Fanno Creek to the south, there are no opportunities to provide a through street and meet the block size requirements. Section 18.810.040.B.2 also states that bicycle and pedestrian connections on public easements or right-of-ways shall be provided when full street connection is not possible. Spacing between connections shall be no more than 330 feet, except where precluded by environmental or topographical constraints, existing development patterns, or strict adherence to other standards in the code. Bicycle and pedestrian connections already exists across Fanno Creek to the south within Fanno Creek Park. Lots - Size and Shape: Section 18.810.060(A) prohibits lot depth from being more than 2.5 times the average lot width, unless the parcel is less than 1.5 times the minimum lot size of the applicable zoning district. Lot Frontage: Section 18.810.060(B) requires that lots have at least 25 feet of frontage on public or private streets, other than an alley. In the case of a land partition, 18.420.050.A.4.c applies, which requires a parcel to either have a minimum 15-foot frontage or a minimum 15-foot wide recorded access easement. In cases where the lot is for an attached single-family dwelling unit, the frontage shall be at least 15 feet. No new parcels are being created with this project. These standards do not apply. Sidewalks: Section 18.810.070.A requires that sidewalks be constructed to meet City design standards and be located on both sides of arterial, collector and local residential streets. Private streets and industrial streets shall have sidewalks on at least one side. There are existing sidewalks along the Hall Boulevard and Bumham Street frontages. The sidewalks are not at their ultimate design location. This development is not required to relocate the sidewalks. Sanitary Sewers: Sewers Required: Section 18.810.090.A requires that sanitary sewer be installed to serve each new development and to connect developments to existing mains in accordance with the provisions set forth in Design and Construction Standards for Sanitary and Surface Water Management(as adopted by the Unified Sewerage Agency in 1996 and including any future revisions or amendments) and the adopted policies of the comprehensive plan. Over-sizing: Section 18.810.090.0 states that proposed sewer systems shall include consideration of additional-development within the area as projected by the Comprehensive Plan. No sanitary sewer improvements are required for this development. Storm Drainage: General Provisions: Section 18.810.100.A states requires developers to make adequate provisions for storm water and flood water runoff. Accommodation of Upstream Drainage: Section 18.810.100.0 states that a culvert or other drainage facility shall be large enough to accommodate potential runoff from its entire upstream drainage area, whether inside or outside the development. The City Engineer shall approve the necessary size of the facility, based on the provisions of Design and Construction Standards for Sanitary and Surface Water Management(as adopted by the Unified Sewerage Agency in 2000 and including any future revisions or amendments). There are no upstream drainage ways that impact this development. Effect on Downstream Drainage: Section 18.810.100.D states that where it is anticipated by the City Engineer that the additional runoff resulting from the development will overload an existing drainage facility the Director and Engineer shall withhold approval of the development until provisions have been made for improvement of the potential condition or until provisions have been made for storage of additional runoff caused by the development in accordance with the Design and Construction Standards for Sanitary and Surface Water Management (as adopted by the Unified Sewerage agency in 2000 and including any future revisions or amendments). NOTICE.OF TYPE II DECISION SDR2006-00005/TIGARD SKATE PARK PAGE 22 OF 27 In 1997, Clean Water Services (CWS) completed a basin study of Fanno Creek and adopted the Fanno Creek Watershed Management Plan. Section Vpof that plan includes a recommendation that local governments institute a stormwater detention/effective impervious area reduction program resulting in no net increase in storm peak flows up to the 25-year event. The City will require that al[new developments resulting in an increase of impervious surfaces provide onsite detention facilities,unless the development is located adjacent to Fanno Creek. For those developments adjacent to Fanno Creek,the storm water runoff will be permitted to discharge without detention. A drainage study prepared by an Oregon Registered Professional Engineer maybe required by ODOT. The applicant will be required to obtain an ODOT Drainage Permit for connection to the state highway drainage facilities prior to issuance of permits. Utilities: Section 18.810.120 states that all utility lines, but not limited to those required for electric communication, lighting and cable television services and related facilities shall be placed underground, except for surface mounted transformers, surface mounted connection boxes and meter cabinets which may be placed above ground, temporary utility service facilities during construction, high capacity electric lines operating at 50,000 volts or above,and: • The developer shall make all necessary arrangements with the serving utility to provide the underground services; • The City reserves the right to approve location of all surface mounted facilities; • All underground utilities, including sanitary sewers and storm drains installed in streets by the developer,shall be constructed prior to the surfacing of the streets;and • Stubs for service connections shall be long enough to avoid disturbing the street improvements when service connections are made. Exception to Under-Grounding Requirement: Section 18.810.120.0 states that a developer shall pay a fee in-lieu of under-grounding costs when the development is proposed to take place on a street where existing utilities which are not underground will serve the development and the approval authority determines that the cost and technical difficulty of under-grounding the utilities outweighs the benefit of under-grounding in conjunction with the development. The determination shall be on a case-by-case basis. The most common, but not the only, such situation is a short frontage development for which under-grounding would result in the placement of additional poles, rather than the removal of above-ground utilities facilities. An applicant for a development which is served by utilities which are not underground and which are located across a public right-of-way from the applicant's property shall pay a fee in-lieu of under-grounding. There are existing overhead utility lines along the frontage of SW Hall Boulevard and SW Burnham Street. If the fee in-lieu is proposed, it is equal to $35.00 per lineal foot of street frontage that contains the overhead lines. It is not clear from the applicant's submittal if they will be providing lighting for this facility. If lighting or other electrical needs are required for this development then the applicant shall pay the fee-in-lieu of under-grounding. ADDITIONAL CITY AND/OR AGENCY CONCERNS WITH STREET AND UTILITY IMPROVEMENT STANDARDS: Storm Water Quality: The City has agreed to enforce Surface Water Management SWM) regulations established by Clean Water Services (CWS) Design and Construction Standards ((adopted by Resolution and Order No. 00-7) which require the construction of on-site water quality facilities. The facilities shall be designed to remove 65 percent of the phosphorus contained in 100 percent of the storm water runoff generated from newly created impervious surfaces. In addition, a maintenance plan shall be submitted indicating the frequency and method to be used in keeping the facility maintained through the year. Prior to issuance of.permits, the a licant shall submit plans and calculations for a water quality facility that will meet the intent of the Design Standards and the ODOT drainage requirements. In addition,the applicant shall submit a maintenance plan for the facility that must be reviewed and approved by the City pnor to construction. An ODOT Drainage Permit is required prior to issuance of City permits. NOTICE OF TYPE II DECISION SDR2006-00005/TIGARD SKATE PARK PAGE 23 OF 27 The proposed unit from Stormwater Management is acceptable provided the property owner agrees to hire the manufacturer(or approved equal) to provide the requires maintenance of the unit. Prior to a final building inspection, the applicant shall demonstrate that they have entered into a maintenance agreement with Stormwater Management, or another company that demonstrates they can meet the maintenance requirements of the manufacturer. Grading and Erosion Control: CWS Design and Construction Standards also regulate erosion control to reduce the amount of sediment and other pollutants reaching the public storm and surface water system resulting from development, construction, grading, excavating, clearing, and any other activity which accelerates erosion. Per CWS regulations, the applicant is required-to submit an erosion control plan for City review and approval prior to issuance of City permits. The Federal Clean Water Act requires that a National Pollutant Discharge Elimination System (NPDES) erosion control permit be issued for any development that will disturb one or more acre of and. Since this site is over five acres, the developer will be required to obtain an NPDES permit from the City prior to construction. This permit will be issued along with the site and/or building permit. The erosion control permit will be issued by the Building Department along with the Site permit. Site Permit Required: The applicant is re uired to obtain a Site Permit from the Building Division to cover all on-site private utility installations water, sewer, storm, etc.) and driveway construction. This permit shall be obtained prior to approval of the final plat. E. IMPACT STUDY Section 18.360.090 states, "The Director shall make a finding with respect to each of the following criteria when approving,approving with conditions or denying an application:" Section 18.390.040 states that the applicant shall provide an impact study to quantify the effect of development on public facilities and services. For each public facility system and type of impact, the study shall propose improvements necessary to meet City standard, and to minimize the impact of the development on the public at large, public facilities systems, and affected private property users. In situations where the Community Development Code requires the dedication of real property interests, the applicant shall either specifically concur with a requirement for public right-of-way dedication, or provide evidence that supports that the real property dedication is not roughly proportional to the projected impacts of the development. Section 18.390.040 states that when a condition of approval requires the transfer to the public of an interest in real property, the approval authority shall adopt findings which support the conclusion that the interest in real property to be transferred is roughly proportional to the impact the proposed development will have on the public. The .applicant has provided an impact study addressing the project's impacts on public systems. An existing connection with public storm sewer will be utilized. Runoff from the skate park is no greater than the existing parking lot area. No sanitary sewer or water is required for the proect. No street improvements are required based on the expected traffic impact and both Burnham and are improved with sidewalks and street trees. The estimated increase of vehicle trips per day is eighteen (18),which does not constitute a traffic study. The proposed development will increase the inventory of Tigard park land. The Washington County Traffic Impact Fee (TIF) is a mitigation measure that is required at the time of development. Based on a transportation impact study prepared by Mr. David Larson for the A Boy Expansion/Dolan II/Resolution 95-61, TIF's are expected to recapture 32 percent of the traffic impact of new development on the Collector and Arterial Street system. Based on the use, city park,the applicant is required to pay TIF's of approximately$525.00. Final TIF payment will be assessed at time of building permit submittal. NOTICE OF TYPE II DECISION SDR2006-00005/TIGARD SKATE PARK PAGE 24 OF 27 Based on the estimate that total TIF fees cover 32 percent of the impact on major street improvements citywide,a fee that would cover 100 percent of this projects traffic impact is $1,641 ($525 divided by.32). The difference between the TIF paid, and the full impact is considered the unmitigated impact on the street system. Besides the TIF that mitigates for 32% of tie projects impact on the transportation system, the applicant is required to dedicate additional right-of-way along Hall Boulevard and Burnham Street (22 feet x 370 feet = 8,140 square feet along Hall and 17.5 feet x 180 feet = 3,150 square feet along Burnham). The estimated value of the dedication is fifteen dollars a square foot for a total value of$169,350. The streets have adequate pavement widths, and sidewalks, so no street improvements are required with this development. The estimated value of the dedication greatly exceeds the estimated value of the impact, but these are the minimum right-of-way dedications necessary to meet current standards. Estimated Value of Impacts Full Impact $ 1641.00 Less '1"IN Assessment -$ 525.00 Less Mitigated Costs (dedication only -$ 169350.00 Estimated Difference between Costs and Value of Impacts $ -168,234.00 SECTION VII. OTHER STAFF COMMENTS The City of Tigard Building Division has reviewed the proposal and had no objections. The City of Tigard Engineering Department was sent this proposal for review and the comments have been incorporated into this decision. The City of Tigard Police Department has reviewed this application and had the following concerns: • It has been mentioned numerous times, in multiple communications,inferring that the skate park's close proximity to the Tigard Police Department is desirable in ways of providing a "built-in" security. component. It serves to mention that typically officers are not inside the building, but rather in the field servicing the calls for assistance or patrolling within the community. If the notion that police are always available at the "station" to remedy a situation at the skate park; that assumption would likely be incorrect. The facility will need to be "policed" on its own with respect to the enforcement of "-park rules." The police will be available through typical and conventional methods such as being dispatched through the regional communications center:If a situation arises at the skate park that warrants police assistance,the complainant may use a telephone located in the police lobby if no other means is available. The lobby is open to the public from lam until 11pm daily. However, the expectation that an officer is immediately available inside the building at any given time is untrue.Police will be dispatched as available and according to priority. • Concerns have also been expressed regarding the availability of pparking at Tigard City Hall. Specifically on days when Municipal Court has an abundant case load, pairing may be scarce. The availability of parking for the public and employees is a concern. • In addition, specifically police employees have concerns regarding the security of their personal vehicles parked at City Hall. It would not be unreasonable to surmise that Tigard Police Officers may have in the past or possibly in the future, encounter certain users of the skate park. This is not to assume that users of the skate park are "all" problematic; on the contrary, the majority of the skate park users are respectable, upstanding members of the community. However, there are isolated incidents that may require police contact with respect to users of the skate park For officers involved, there are concerns about retaliation, primarily in the form of vandalism to their vehicles. Understandably, users of the skate park will have ample opportunity to visi,ally observe officers arriving and departing for work in the parking areas located adjacent to the skate park. • In 2006 an ordinance was created in Tigard that limited consumption of alcoholic beverages in certain Tigard parks. Fanno Creek Park, which is adjacent to the property at Tigard City Hall and nearby the location for the planned Tigard Skate Park, should also be includec. in the area prohibiting alcohol. The ordinance was created as a vehicle to help manage the escalating issues of transients using the parks to consume alcohol, which created safety and environmental concerns voiced by citizens who used the parks as well. Evidence of litter, human waste, urinating in public and other illicit activities appeared to be aggravated by the permitting of alcohol consumption in Tigard parks. NOTICE OF TYPE II DECISION SDR2006-00005/TIGARD SKATE PARK PAGE 25 OF 27 It is important to make clear whether the Tigard Skate Park is included in this parameter. The Police Department would support that the skate park be included in the alcohol ban. It is likely that most users of the skate park will be juveniles, and bylaw underage for consuming alcohol. However, there may be opportunity}or visitors to the skate park to be of legal drinking age. The co-mingling of these two distinct age groups can present problems related to alcohol. Clear defining rules need to be established. SECTION VIII. AGENCY COMMENTS Tualatin Valley Fire and Rescue (TVF&R) has reviewed the proposal and has no concerns insofar as fire apparatus access or firefighting water supplies is concerned. OREGON DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION was sent a copy of the proposal and recommended the following comments: The site is adjacent to the referenced state highway. ODOT has permitting authority for the state highway and an interest in ensuring that the proposed land use is compatible with its safe and efficient operation. Please direct the applicant to the District Contact indicated below to determine permit requirements and obtain application information. (District 2A Contact: Sam Hunaidi at 503-229-5002) ODOT RECOMMENDED LOCAL CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL: ♦ Right of way dedication as necessary to accommodate the planned cross section identified in the local Transportation System Plan shall be provided through deed to the Oregon Department of Transportation. The dedication must iDe to the State of Oregon, Oregon Department of Transportation. The ODOT District contact will assist in coordinating the dedication. ODOT should provide verification to the local jurisdiction that the dedication requirement has been fulfilled. The property owner must be the signatory for the dedication and will be responsible for a certified environmental assessment of the site pnor to transfer of property to the Department. • An ODOT Miscellaneous Permit must be obtained for all work in the highway right of way. • An ODOT Drainage Permit is required for connection to state highway drainage facilities. Connection will only be considered if the site s drainage naturally enters ODOT right of way. The applicant must provide ODOT District with a preliminary drainage plan showing impacts to the highway right of way. A drainage study prepared by an Oregon Registered Professional Engineer is usually required by ODOT if: 1. Total peak runoff entering the highway right of way is greater than 1.77 cubic feet per second; or 2. The improvements create an increase of the impervious surface area greater than 10,758 square feet. PORTLAND GENERAL ELECTRIC reviewed the plans and had concerns that the skate park was possibly being placed above underground power lines and equipment. Locates were performed for the site, but no_ivies were found within the project area. SECTION IX. PROCEDURE AND APPEAL INFORMATION Notice: Notice was posted at City Hall and mailed to: X The applicant and owners X Owner of record within the required distance X Affected government agencies Final Decision: THIS DECISION IS FINAL ON MARCH 1,2007 AND BECOMES EFFECTIVE ON MARCH 16,2007 UNLESS AN APPEAL IS FILED. NOTICE OF TYPE II DECISION SDR2006-00005/TIGARD SKATE PARK PAGE 26 OF 27 eal The otecision of the Director (Type II Procedure) or Review Authority (Type II Administrative Appeal or Type III Procedure) is final for purposes of appeal on the date that it is mailed. Any party with standing as provided in Section 18.390.040.G.1. may appeal this decision in accordance with Section 18.390.040.G.2. of the Tigard Community Development Code which provides that a written appeal together with the required fee shall be filed with the Director within ten (10)business days of the date the notice of the decision was mailed. The appeal fee schedule and forms are available from the Planning Division of Tigard City Hall, 13125 SW Hall-Boulevard,Tigard,Oregon 97223. Unless the applicant is the appellant,the hearing on an appeal from the Director's Decision shall be confined to the specific issues identified in the written comments submitted by-the parties during the comment period. Additional evidence concerning issues properly raised in the Notice of Appeal may be submitted by any party during the appeal hearing,subject to any additional rules of procedure that may be adopted from time to time by the appellate body. THE DEADLINE FOR FILING AN APPEAL IS AT 5:00 PM ON MARCH 15,2007. estions: If you have any questions, please call the City of Tigard Planning Division, Tigard City Hall, 13125 SW Hall Boulevard,Tigard,Oregon at (503) 639-4171. a . C� zJ March 1,2007 PREPARE BY: Cheryl Gaines DATE Assistant Planner i:\curpin\cheryl\sdr\SDR2006-00005.decision NOTICE OF TYPE II DEQSION SDR2006-00005/TIGARD SKATE PARK PAGE 27 OF 27 O (jj � % GEOGRAPHIC INFORMATION SYSTEM 4/ 4' '° 0 44r4- ' VICINITY MAP e �, e,� ��a��ti y .r')' , ST SDR2006-00005 * TIGARD SKATE �-9, PARK \A LEGEND: sT • e„„, ... Subject Site I 4 --- - ,. \\\\ \ ,\\\,:s \ t i : jL s � '�. _ - __ --_ Tigard Area Map 0 10 N ,0. __, .• LP ,/'-' , illiltr 0 100 200 300 400 500 Feet - \X 1"=389 feet 41111 * •J . f I �W 14 —7 I _ _ ST al ,,.0 fIGARD I IIIII q .• �� -� - -- Information on this map is for general location only and —I — should be verified with the Development Services Division. 13125 SW Hall Blvd -• Tigard,OR 97223 + I— -- —i I i (503)639-4171 - .. http:/hwow.ci.tigard.or.us Community Development Plot date:Jan 29,2007;C:ImagicM AGIC03.APR IR-5/8 WC IR-518 2FG1SuER`n0 { r " ' `•. � SKATEPARK ELEVATIONS �?""p`"a�a°L SW BURNHAM STREET \ OTC OREGON lid[ NM 1FtLY %f 'tit r L « ;: 14,„ _ ; _ 111111 I-77.1 -1 Niche /Skotepork Lot 31 Spaces 1- 1 f1 L.L�q II c� R iI I . 61 Im'� VIAINE 7 t( C 1 r,, m : del I CITY . \ 6..ae_wv.6.4+�1•) .e.y.4• .l,ll• ,1 '.' I I ! '1 HALL C - a .1 WEST FACING ELEVATION Z iVIl1 'I''-Y ..mow...: I WtaGa.ApA21 ANNEX �Y`I 1 ::;:. Q •t sw.. I•.20•- Q thaa{t rY I m.rlrwo ( (NICHE) ` . 1111111 L Q -` IDrokiage'Calculdtions j I a� - . 1.1 1 1 1 (1 1 1111T I 1 1 % J TM- �1_I _ ti ,.� 1 0 1`k \ _ City Hall North Lot - 63 Spaces •Y y ��•� _ _- �+ r•.►. %►� 0 !_ ) -•l •�.n PROPOSED .a !1�� `� r I �� SKATEPARK • • Ir,�7r,,,.,., ftlIllPllll' Ii1111T91111111111..IIIIIIIllll.ullll �' er—� I I I '® �' ' II..� ' s4I,w.ro....itmem.•;..,....I " �� L•{�� SOUTH FACING ELEVATION j `I Police North Lot - 82 Spaces __ ••C•`• scan.. I za' _>"1J1 1,l l.� � i 111 I�1 _' G_ �_. .. I s = � �rivrcN /vt -- .M.II em r ,;:��"°d" "a�„r,',;- I - " 114 r▪ llllll@ lll'PTgV41111111111 I111hAIII I .1111111111111111111111 I IL14111011NIIIIIIII7111117 Illllllb W 111.11111E=�' :: .;.- ,� ° L •Yam; 1 m EAST FACING ELEVATION 1 m, zo' •L♦ %♦ a +J cik +! a%.2 IX+i•}$% •ii--__+AI��i J I Vl O e ;t,�: a U * I I s1� °.1G .r ,-----1,— QQ ® f �" I I 1 Ill a III ill nn11 I I..,DD 1 111 iu - - J f., sz 9[+ I I '.I,.!)6D alli .∎JIJ .1•iiv%a cl•t T I1'�'.• a _ _ TI I 1 I��-1.1 TT-I-TFU LLL •6• POLICE I 1 NORTH FACING ELEVATION 0 NN (I, `� ts'City Hall South Lot - 33 Spaces le - 1�U 3C1 •h - l'•'•`;,. , I- LEGEND I [SITE AREA _ x `- ` � �--L1.1_ �J J1�•- Sri DE Amos Spare Feet x SKATEPARK / • _ Ie r'1 Q 1.m vte Area 9 8 a2e.ew 102R SITE PLAN �� Q • . • ® O I I4, ESe.nE:sting I[endt..Nan for Landscape Area 2.06 124,602 208 oa O I I: e.P.w.,,or. 6.30 304.049 of ELEVATIONS Sire and Specws a ♦ r ' 1+ - E.strg 1r..to S.Pommel roolammt 11/ I 1 O i . I I ; P.opo.ad P.wng Let lr.. `` CITY HALL I I 7 CITY HALL II- • Enstoq Lignt Pm. aw M/wn 1 I Propos.a Poing Lm Land.<apep ` 4 .wr On �� \ we w. C/V Cmpom/Vanpotl Paring Spaces _� �I H/C Nandl<gp Pack,spat. -- ¢¢¢���I I I C Compaq P.kng Spac.. —f��r ;I I,..f.yr i t I VICINRY MAP SKATEPARK SITE PLAN ; 1 SCALE: 1" = 30' , t ARD SKATE PARK DESIGN TOTALPARE AREA∎IS 0SQ FT. { TIGARD TB SURFACE AND RETALNLND WALL 111 APRO3L 300 SO.Fi OF ADDITIONAL SETS AS ON - - - I, ,•��tJ/r PARKING LOT LAYOUPPIAN eat' - REC NED o ° 6T ,T BANK TT 33 PARE IYBB INCLUDES COURSE SAN AN ALL.ELEVATIONS GIVEN ARE LN ° , ° RBIATBHITO AVERAGE IW ELEVATION ■ AUG 2 ° o v, O NOT TO :LE CITY OF RUA - - - -/-7 ° °o • CONCRETE DE TAILS: PLANNING/E KNEE SING O ` -CONCRETE MCC-4000 PSI / ° O O ° '•�°'�L"°® ACROSS° ° O SKATE PARR, "FROM ° ° Q ° ° a I _ -3N CRUSHED ROM COMPACTED TO I ° `O � Q O 10 *YARDS POUR PER DAY -10•SAW CUTS •D@ EVERY IB TO . O ° HANDRAIL°O° / / • °° • I , ACT ASA GROOVE CUT , ipIR BANK i ° ` O°° O ° (PDPOUT lwaq n ril m ° ® II o ° ° DETAIL A: 0 r SCH.40 PIPERAB. Q� O ° ///// : -.0.—.•••."--- ° •° I LEGEND: a•�� ° 0 RABS ND�L.EDOpB • O _ 70P Or OF T OR TIO N a ` ° I - BOTT031 01 TFANBRWN•O er.) RAID'aunt OR 7RANffiRON H �°� HANDRAILS g N.1, •l . O i . / DETAIL ° o O ° • 1A1CDO �Rqu •• DRAO n O" VQ s H O ■O � f c:uiv»Llmaes ° I ° ° DESIGN AND OD1431RUCTIOPIBY: OR BENCH P O ° j \ I DAM•»S_CATPIA1ZS THESE AREAS ARE LEDGES TO TRANSOM / / 0 O R MARK A SCOTT I ® ° 96068 HWY.101 PMB 3M —I / ° O O 97367 l4 CITY.oREOON , �%\ i ►1 �so3)smm�r//// AP I /I �/ j • ° O I CCU S1sYtx1 1/4 PIPEI �/ \ J 16 io til/ I I // /I LJ/I SCALE: 1' = 10' sins—I:io DATE: 7/02/05 I,�i I DRAWN BY HER /10723 - — , .( SHEET NO. 1 n— l- 3 OF 3 1 • f s ,° • t City of Tigard EXHIBIT Parks Department SDR2006-00005 Attn: Dan Plaza TIGARD SKATE PARK 13125 SW Hall Blvd. Tigard, OR 97223 Winterbrook Planning Attn: Ben Schonberger 310 SW 4h Ave.,Suite 1100 Portland, OR 97204 Joanne Zimmer and Ted Hedlund 13331 SW Chelsea Loop Tigard, OR 97223 ODOT Region 1 Planning Attn: Development Review 123 NW Flanders Street Portland, OR 97209-4037 Portland General Electric Attn: Ken Gutierrez,Project Manager Service Design&Construction 9480 SW Boeckman Road Wilsonville, OR 97070 Tigard Police Department Attn:Jim Wolf II AFFIDAVIT OF MAILING • TIGARD I,Patricia L. Lunsford, being fast duly sworn/affirm, on oath depose and say that I am a Senior Administrative Specialist for the City of Tigard,Washington County,Oregon and that I served the following: 9 NOTICE OF DECISION FOR SDR2006-00005/TIGARD SKATE PARK (File No✓Name Reference) ❑ AMENDED NOIRE ® City of Tigard Planning Director A copy of the said notice being hereto attached,marked Exhibit"A",and by reference made a part hereof,was mailed to each named person(s) at the address(s) shown on the attached list(s),marked Exhibit"B",and by reference made a part hereof,on March 1,2007,and deposited in the United States Mail on March 1,2007,postage prepaid. r : it.-AirL (Perso' Pre...-d Notice) STATE OF OREGON County of Washington ss. City of Tigard —y Subscribed and sworn/affirmed before me on the -2 day of // /am ,2007. ) f(I ? f DIAOFE FIM CESDERKS J /� / iAlt/C- .j NMY SUBUOOEO ) NOTARY P OF OREGON 6 MY COMMISSION EXPIRES SEPT.25,2007 �- My Commission Expires: 9 7m7o 7 EXHIBIT A NOTICE OF TYPE II DECISION U, SITE DEVELOPMENT REVIEW(SDR) 2006-00005 1714 TIGARD SKATE PARK 120 DAYS /18/200 SECTION I. APPLICATION SUMMARY FILE NAME: TIGARD SKATE PARK CASE NO.: Site Development Review(SDR) SDR2006-00005 PROPOSAL: The applicant is requesting approval to construct a 15,000 square-foot skate park on the City Hall site. The site consists of three parcels that total 9.84 acres. APPLICANT/ City of Tigard APPLICANT'S Winterbrook Planning OWNER: Parks Department REP.: Attn: Ben Schonberger Ann:Dan Plaza 310 SW 4h Ave.,Suite 1100 13125 SW Hall Blvd. Portland, OR 97204 Tigard,OR 97223 LOCATION: 13125 SW Hall Blvd.,Washington County Tax Map 2S 102DA,Tax Lot 400. ZONE: CBD: Central Business District. The CBD zoning district is designed to provide a concentrated central business district, centered on the City's historic downtown, including a mix of civic, retail and office uses. Single-family attached housing, at a maximum density of 12 units/net acre, equivalent of the R-12 zoning district, and multi-family housing at a minimum density of 32 units/acre, equivalent to the R-40 zoning district, are permitted outright. A wide range of uses, including but not limited to adult entertainment, utilities, facilities with drive-up windows, medical centers, major event entertainment and gasoline stations, are permitted conditionally. APPLICABLE RE VIE W CRITERIA: Community Development Code Chapters 18.360, 18.390, 18.520, 18.705, 18.725, 18.745, 18.755, 18.765, 18.780, 18.790, 18.795 and 18.810. SECTION II. DECISION Notice is hereby given that the City of Tigard Community Development Director's designee has APPROVED the above request. The findings and conclusions on which the decision is based are noted in the full decision, available at City Hall. THIS APPROVAL SHALL BE VALID FOR 18 MONTHS FROM THE EFFECTIVE DATE OF THIS DECISION. All documents and applicable criteria in the above-noted file are available for inspection at no cost or copies can be obtained for twenty-five cents (25 ) per page,or the current rate charged for copies at the time of the request. SECTION III. PROCEDURE AND APPEAL INFORMATION Notice: Notice mailed to: X The applicant and owners X Owner of record within the required distance X Affected government agencies Final Decision: THIS DECISION IS FINAL ON MARCH 1, 2007 AND BECOMES EFFECTIVE ON MARCH 16, 2007 UNLESS AN APPEAL IS FILED. Appeal: The Director's Decision is final on the date that it is mailed. All persons entitled to notice or who are otherwise adversely affected or aggrieved by the decision as_provided in Section 18.390.040.G.1 may appeal this decision in accordance with Section 18.390.040.G.2 of the Tigard Community Development Code which.provides that a written appeal together with the required fee shall be filed with the Director within ten (10) business days of the date the Notice of Decision was mailed. The appeal fee schedule and forms are available from the Planning Division of Tigard City Hall, 13125 SW Hall Boulevard, Tigard,Oregon 97223. Unless the applicant is the appellant, the hearing on an appeal from the Director's Decision shall be confined to the specific issues identified in the written comments submitted by the parties during the comment period. Additional evidence concerning issues properly raised in the Notice of Appeal may be submitted by any party during the appeal hearing,subject to any additional rules of procedure that maybe adopted from time to time by the appellate body. THE DEADLINE FOR FILING AN APPEAL IS 5:00 PM ON MARCH 15, 2007. estions: For further information_please contact the Planning Division Staff Planner, Cheryl Caines at (503) 639-4171, Tigard City Hall, 13125 SW Hall Boulevard,Tigard, Oregon 97223. 1i .,;4 ��� '.�. VICINITY MAP iit • _\,,,- /Q'" > SDR2006 00005 .' 401 PARKG SKATE i LEGEND: / • ix. Subject Site i41110111 4441,764‘ _...e ms 1, ' ♦ . , 1 I Iiiii' A c•pc: II IN E" - ter- - -'— �.. TIGARD SKATE PARK DESIGN N _.. �.. 1 ; REC; a:D � of Z =-- +aa t 71— �.w.ur POUT AUG 2 Oa• (, .2154.1 _�- I, � : I J ®----6"-- e ® .\ CITY OF iLri ° ° :� ! 4 i� III - PLANNINGJE .INee• e O (.77.:�• 1r31[° .°_ I ! -- •I LEGEND: WIT ' Diu i •` 8, �.. o°off _�._•./io — •• ' es+ Co)I •- sibs/ � . T fir � .%��% .�., SKATEPARK SITE PLAN .a •••••• •••••• • • ti•••••• BEDOLLA B KAREN HEDLUND B-04900 EXH{BIT BEDOA KAREN R HEDL TED B& 8915 SW O'MARA ST ZIMMER JOANNE M TIGARD,OR 97223 13331 SW CHELSEA LP TIGARD,OR 97224 2S102DD-01500 2S102DD-01400 BLICK CARL J DONA JEAN HOLSTEIN MARVIN R/LORETTA R TRS 8740 SW O'MARA 8710 SW OMARA TIGARD,OR 97223 TIGARD,OR 97223 2S102AD-02200 2S10208-03500 BURNHAM BUSINESS&STORAGE LLC ISOM DAVID BRYAN AND 9500 SW BARBUR BLVD STE 300 BARBARA JO PORTLAND, OR 97219 13391 SW CHELSEA LOOP TIGARD,OR 97223 02D3-00 0 2S101CB-00400 BUR BUSINESS&STORAGE LLC JEMPAK PARTNERS LLC 950 W RBUR BLVD STE 300 7034 SW 83RD AVE RTLAND, OR 97219 PORTLAND,OR 97223 2S 102 D B-02800 2 S 102 D D-01300 BYRNE JAMES G&DIANNE V KRAEMER JULIA A&MARK W 13454 SW CHELSEA LOOP PO BOX 80665 TIGARD,OR 97223 PORTLAND,OR 97280 •S102DA-0+,+0 2S102DA-00900 CI •• TIGARD LOUCKS PATRICIA& 1 5 S∎• ALL BLVD BURTON LUCY !GARD, O' •7223 13337 SW HALL BLVD PORTLAND,OR 97223 102D0-00100 2S102DA-00100 CI • I • GARD MAGNO LLC 131 : SW '' L BLVD 8800 SW COMMERICAL ST GARD,OR 97223 TIGARD,OR 97223 2 S 102 D B-03200 2 S 102 DA-00300 COGBURN ROBINANN K& MATSUMOTO WILLIAM Y& NINA A FRARY MAUREEN L 8770 SW BURNHAM RD 13348 SW CHELSEA LOOP TIGARD,OR 97223 TIGARD,OR 97223 2S102DB-05000 2S102DD-01501 DACUS WILLIAM J &DEBRA S MCANDREW JOHN W&ANGELA D 13322 SW CHELSEA LP 8830 SW OMARA ST TIGARD, OR 97223 TIGARD,OR 97223 2S102DB-03000 2S102D8-03100 HARBISON PATRICK N& ERICA L MERRICK DONALD L&CAROL J 13404 SW CHELSEA LP 13376 SW CHELSEA LP TIGARD, OR 97223 TIGARD, OR 97223 • 2STO2DB-00603 2S102DA-00704 OTTING LOIS E TI D CI OF 8885 SW O'MARA ST 13125 HALL BLVD TIGARD, OR 97223 ARD,OR 23 2S102DB-03300 2S102DA-00400 REDFIELD SPENCER D JR& TIG D CITY F MARY L 13125 S ALL BLVD 13336 SW CHELSEA LP D,OR 23 TIGARD, OR 97223 2S102DB-03400 2S 02DA-00402 RYBKA KEVIN P TIGA CI OF 13363 SW CHELSEA LOOP 13125 ALL BLVD TIGARD,OR 97223 T RD,OR 23 2S102DA-00800 2 02DA-00200 SCHALTZ RANDY A&MARGARET C TIG D CI OF 13335 SW HALL BLVD 1312 HALL BLVD TIGARD,OR 97224 T GARD,OR 23 2S102DD-01301 2S102AD-03450 STATE OF OREGON TIGARD WATER DISTRICT /Aril VENN/S K, DEPARTMENT OF TRASPORTATION 8777 SW BURNHAM ST RIGHT OF WAY SECTION PO BOX 23000 417 TRANSPORTATION BLDG TIGARD,OR 97223 SALEM,OR 97310 2S1020B-00601 2S1• •0-03451 STEINBICHLER GEORGE& TIGA-'WATE: .!STRICT SHARILYN 8777 S = .'NHAM ST 8855 SW OMARA ST PO BO 31i. TIGARD,OR 97223 T =•RD,OR 972 2S102DA-00701 2S1020A-00500 TIGARD CHRISTIAN CHURCH TIGARD-TUALATIN SCHOOL 13405 SW HALL BLVD DISTRICT#23J TIGARD,OR 97223 6960 SW SANDBURG ST TIGARD,OR 97223 2S1 A-00401 2S102DB-02700 TIGAR OF TIMM CARREN A 131 W H BLVD 13488 SW CHELSEA LP GARD,OR 972 TIGARD,OR 97223 S102DB-00500 2S102DB-00604 TIG• '. C " OF TOMBLESON DANICE LLOYDE 1312 " tr -*LL BLVD 8825 SW O'MARA ST ARD,OR 9 - TIGARD,OR 97223 2 102DA-00703 2S1020B-00100 TIGA CITY 0 VERIZON NORTHWEST INC 13125 S BLVD PO BOX 152206 TIG ,OR 9722 IRVING,TX 75015 • 2S"02 D B-02900 ZHANG CHINGSHENG 13416 SW CHELSEA LOOP TIGARD,OR 97223 Nathan and Ann Murdock Mildren Design Group PO Box 231265 Attn: Gene Mildren Tigard, OR 97281 7650 SW Beveland Street, Suite 120 Tigard, OR 97223 Sue Rorman Susan Beilke 11250 SW 82nd Avenue 11755 SW 114th Place Tigard, OR 97223 Tigard, OR 97223 Naomi Gallucci 11285 SW 78th Avenue Tigard, OR 97223 Diane Baldwin 3706 Kinsale Lane SE Olympia, WA 98501 Brad Spring 7555 SW Spruce Street Tigard, OR 97223 Alexander Craghead 12205 SW Hall Boulevard Tigard, OR 97223-6210 Gretchen Buehner 13249 SW 136th Place Tigard, OR 97224 John Frewing 7110 SW Lola Lane Tigard, OR 97223 CPO 4B 16200 SW Pacific Highway, Suite H242 Tigard, OR 97224 CPO 4M Pat Whiting 8122 SW Spruce Tigard, OR 97223 CITY OF TIGARD - EAST INTERESTED PARTIES (i:\curpin\setup\iabels\CIT East.doc) UPDATED: 12-Dec-06 Josh Thomas Susa• Beilke 10395 SW Bonanza 11755 ••, 114th Place Tigard, OR 97224 jig.rd, OR ' 23 Gre . en Buehnor 13249 0 h Place Tigar•, •R 9 -24 Paul Owen 10335 SW Highland Drive Tigard, OR 97224 Tim Esau PO Box 230695 Tigard, OR 97281 C" 4B 16200 '- ific Highway, Suite H242 Ti.. o, OR 97224 Ross Sundberg 16382 SW 104th Avenue Tigard, OR 97224 Brian Wegener 9830 SW Kimberly Drive Tigard, OR 97224 Joseph Dyar 10285 SW Highland Drive Tigard, OR 97224-4668 Rex Caffall 13205 SW Village Glenn Tigard, OR 97223 J.-1 Frewin;- 7110 "01 ola Lane lgard, OR • 23 CITY OF TIGARD - SOUTH INTERESTED PARTIES foci. I of h Ii:lcuroln\setuollabels\CIT South.docl UPDATED: 12-Dec-06 AFFIDAVIT OF MAILING Erl I, Patricia L. Lunsford, being first duly sworn/affirm, on oath depose and say that I am a Senior Administrative Specialist for the City of Tigard,Washington County,Oregon and that I served the following: (C1xck Appropnue Box(s)Below) © NOTICE OF PENDING LAND USE DECISION FOR SDR2006-00005/TIGARD SKATE PARK ❑ AMENDED NOTICE (File No/Name Reference) ® City of Tigard Planning Director A copy of the said notice being hereto attached,marked Exhibit"A",and by reference made a part hereof,was mailed to each named person(s) at the address(s) shown on the attached list(s),marked Exhibit"B",and by reference made a part hereof,on January 30,2007,and deposited in the United States Mail on January 30,2007,postage prepaid. I IA/4 e A. . .��.%� �, (Person niPPrep. -• lno tic- STATE OF OREGON County of Washington ss. City of Tigard Subscribed and sworn/affirmed before me on the 31 day of ,200 00,:r.-# ;11 OFFICIAL SF:.I. 1 111% DIANE M JELOt:P � NOTARY PUBLIC-Or ; ' �f COMMISSION NO..;: f j MY COMMISSION EXPIRES Far i IILL- - --- N WYL</ / l TARY PUBLIC O' • • GON f l•. OFFIC AL EA-�-�----� My Commission Expires: V.),)7,0 7 r( .�* 1 IALSEAL �l f -q4:• DIANE M JELDERKS f} 1 `,1;# NOTARY PUBUC-OREGON MY COMMISSION COMMISSION NO 373021 -`�.�.��` EXPIRES SEPT.25,2007 • EXHIBIT_.A,. NOTICE TO MORTGAGEE,LIENHOLDER,VENDOR OR SELLER THE TIGARD DEVELOPMENT CODE REQUIRES THAT IF YOU RECEIVE THIS NOTICE,IT SHALL BE PROMPTLY FORWARDED TO THE PURC-IASER NOTICE OF PENDING LAND USE APPLICATION 's SITE DEVELOPMENT REVIEW TIGARD DATE OF NOTICE: January 30,2007 FILE NUMBER SITE DEVELOPMENT REVIEW(SDR) 2006-00005 (Type II Land Use Application) FILE NAME: TIGARD SKATE PARK REQUEST: The applicant is requesting approval to construct a 15,000 square-foot skate park on the City Hall site. The site consists of three parcels that total 9.84 acres. LOCATION: 13125 SW Hall Boulevard,Washington County Tax Map 2S102DA,Tax Lot 400 and 401; and 8720 SW Bumham Street;Washington County Tax Map 2S102DA,Tax Lot 200. ZONE: CBD: Central Business District. The CBD zoning district is designed to provide a concentrated central business district, centered on the City's historic downtown, including a mix of civic, retail and office uses. Single-family attached housing, at a maximum density of 12 units/net acre, equivalent of the R-12 zoning district, and multi-family housing at a minimum density of 32 units/acre, equivalent to the R-40 zoning district, are permitted outright. A wide range of uses, including but not limited to adult entertainment, utilities, facilities with drive-up windows, medical centers,major event entertainment and gasoline stations,are permitted conditionally. APPLICABLE REVIEW CRITERIA Community Development Code Chapters 18.360, 18.390, 18.520, 18.705, 18.725, 18.745, 18.755, 18.765, 18.780, 18.790, 18.795 and 18.810. YOUR RIGHT TO PROVIDE WRITTEN COMMENTS: Prior to the City making any decision on the Application,you are hereby provided a fourteen (14) day period to submit written comments on the application to the City. THE FOURTEEN (14) DAY PERIOD ENDS AT 5:00 PM ON FEBRUARY 13, 2007. All comments should be directed to Cheryl Caines, Assistant Planner in the Planning Division at the City of Tigard, 13125 SW Hall Boulevard, Tigard, Oregon 97223. You may reach the City of Tigard by telephone at 503.639.4171 x2434 or bye-mail to Cherylcatigard-or.gov. ALL COMMENTS MUST BE RECEIVED BY THE CITY OF TIGARD IN WRITING PRIOR TO 5:00 PM ON THE DATE SPECIFIED ABOVE IN ORDER FOR YOUR COMMENTS TO BE CONSIDERED IN THE DECISION MAKING PROCESS THE CITY OF TIGARD APPRECIAIES RECEIVING COMMENTS AND VALUES YOUR INPUT. COMMENTS WILL BE CONSIDERED AND ADDRESSED WITHIN THE NOTICE OF DECISION. A DECISION ON THIS ISSUE IS TENTATIVELY SCHEDULED FOR MARCH 1, 2007. IF YOU PROVIDE COMMENTS, YOU WILL BE SENT A COPY OF THE FULL DECISION ONCE IT HAS BEEN RENDERED. WRI'1"1"EN COMMENTS WILL BECOME A PART OF THE PERMANENT PUBLIC RECORD AND SHALL CONTAIN THE FOLLOWING INFORMATION: • Address the specific "Applicable Review Criteria" described in the section above or any other criteria believed to be applicable to this proposal; • Raise any issues and/or concerns believed to be important with sufficient evidence to allow the City to provide a response; • Comments that provide the basis for an appeal to the Tigard Hearings Officer must address the relevant approval criteria with sufficient specificity on that issue. Failure of any party to address the relevant approval criteria with sufficient specificity may preclude subsequent appeals to the Land Use Board of Appeals or Circuit Court on that issue. Specific findings directed at the relevant approval criteria are what constitute relevant evidence. AFTER THE 14 DAY COMMENT PERIOD CLOSES,THE DIRECTOR SHALL ISSUE A TYPE II ADMINISTRATIVE DECISION. THE DIRECTOR'S DECISION SHALL BE MAILED TO THE APPLICANT AND TO OWNERS OF RECORD OF PROPERTY LOCATED WITHIN 500 FEET OF THE SUBJECT SITE, AND TO ANYONE ELSE WHO SUBMITTED WRITTEN COMMENTS OR WHO IS OTHERWISE ENTITLED TO NOTICE. THE DIRECTOR'S DECISION SHALL ADDRESS ALL OF THE RELEVANT APPROVAL CRITERIA. BASED UPON THE CRITERIA AND THE FACIS CONTAINED WITHIN THE RECORD, THE DIRECTOR SHALL APPROVE,APPROVE WITH CONDITIONS OR DENY THE REQUESTED PERMIT OR ACTION. SUMMARY OF THE DECISION-MAKING PROCESS: • The application is accepted by the City • Notice is sent to property owners of record within 500 feet of the proposed development area allowing a 14-day written comment period. • The application is reviewed by City Staff and affected agencies. . City Staff issues a written decision. . Notice of the decision is sent to the Applicant and all owners or contract purchasers of record of the site; all owners of record of property located within 500 feet of the site,as shown on the most recent property tax assessment roll;any City-recognized neighborhood group whose boundaries include the site; and any governmental agency which is entitled to notice under an intergovernmental agreement entered into with the City which includes provision for such notice or anyone who is otherwise entitled to such notice. INFORMATION/EVIDENCE AVAILABLE FOR REVIEW: The application,written comments and supporting documents relied upon by the Director to make this decision are contained within the record and are available for public review at the City of Tigard Community Development Department. If you want to inspect the file, please call and make an appointment with either the project planner or the planning technicians. Copies of these items may be obtained at a cost of $.25 per page or the current rate charged for this service. Questions regarding this application should be directed to the Planning Staff indicated on the first page of this Notice under the section titled "Your Right to Provide Written Comments." / • : , , ,��. VIc;INITS'MAP ip.,,, �•• ,`` • SDR21111G-1111115■ .. TIGARD SKATE ♦ ♦ PARK LEGEND: f' bk -Subject Site 4 * #3,0ta,(10/1 •.11144:* a I_ . Art--,...1 111101 --.■, al ,- A% 1711.4,...11 NI .11• .p $7:4IIiI� 10 1311e 1W.1214 "Y•- •prnent O f Of 00i9 ,C UnegiCUAAGIC03 AP0 • 2Sf02DB-00602 2S102DB-04900 EXH I B IT . BEDOLLA KAREN R HEDLUND TED B& 8915 SW O'MARA ST ZIMMER JOANNE M TIGARD, OR 97223 13331 SW CHELSEA LP TIGARD,OR 97224 2S102DD-01500 2S1020D-01400 BLICK CARL J DONA JEAN HOLSTEIN MARVIN R/LORETTA R TRS 8740 SW O'MARA 8710 SW OMARA TIGARD, OR 97223 TIGARD,OR 97223 2S102AD-02200 2S102DB-03500 BURNHAM BUSINESS&STORAGE LLC ISOM DAVID BRYAN AND 9500 SW BARBUR BLVD STE 300 BARBARA JO PORTLAND, OR 97219 13391 SW CHELSEA LOOP TIGARD,OR 97223 02D8-00 0 2S101CB-00400 BUR BUSINESS&STORAGE LLC JEMPAK PARTNERS LLC 950 W RBUR BLVD STE 300 7034 SW 83RD AVE RTLAND,OR 97219 PORTLAND, OR 97223 2S102DB-02800 2S102DD-01300 BYRNE JAMES G&DIANNE V KRAEMER JULIA A&MARK W 13454 SW CHELSEA LOOP PO BOX 80665 TIGARD, OR 97223 PORTLAND,OR 97280 •S102DA-0.-..0 2S102DA-00900 CI • TIGARD LOUCKS PATRICIA& 1 5 SY• ALL BLVD BURTON LUCY IGARD, 0"7223 13337 SW HALL BLVD PORTLAND, OR 97223 • 1020D-00100 2S102DA-00100 CI • - GARD MAGNO LLC 131 : SW '• L BLVD 8800 SW COMMERICAL ST GARD, OR 97 23 TIGARD, OR 97223 2S102DB-03200 2S102DA-00300 COGBURN ROBINANN K& MATSUMOTO WILLIAM Y&NINA A FRARY MAUREEN L 8770 SW BURNHAM RD 13348 SW CHELSEA LOOP TIGARD, OR 97223 TIGARD, OR 97223 2S102DB-05000 2S102DD-01501 DACUS WILLIAM J&DEBRA S MCANDREW JOHN W&ANGELA D 13322 SW CHELSEA LP 8830 SW OMARA ST TIGARD, OR 97223 TIGARD,OR 97223 2S102DB-03000 2S1020B-03100 HARBISON PATRICK N&ERICA L MERRICK DONALD L&CAROL J 13404 SW CHELSEA LP 13376 SW CHELSEA LP TIGARD, OR 97223 TIGARD, OR 97223 • 2S702DB-00603 2S102DA-00704 OTTING LOIS E TI •-D CI OF 8885 SW O'MARA ST 13125 HALL BLVD TIGARD, OR 97223 , ' ARD,OR • 23 2S1020B-03300 2S102DA-00400 REDFIELD SPENCER D JR& TIG D CITY F MARY L 13125 S ALL BLVD 13336 SW CHELSEA LP D,OR 23 TIGARD, OR 97223 2S102DB-03400 2S 02DA-00402 RYBKA KEVIN P TIGA CIT OF 13363 SW CHELSEA LOOP 13125 ALL BLVD TIGARD, OR 97223 T RD,OR 23 2S102DA-00800 2 02DA-00200 SCHALTZ RANDY A&MARGARET C TIG D CI OF 13335 SW HALL BLVD 1312 HALL BLVD TIGARD, OR 97224 T GARD,OR 23 2S 102 D D-01301 2S 102AD-03450 STATE OF OREGON TIGARD WATER DISTRICT /?- N; D w'v,s K• DEPARTMENT OF TRASPORTATION 8777 SW BURNHAM ST RIGHT OF WAY SECTION PO BOX 23000 417 TRANSPORTATION BLDG TIGARD,OR 97223 SALEM,OR 97310 25102D8-00601 2S1 D-03451 STEINBICHLER GEORGE& TIGA •WATE: DISTRICT SHARILYN 8777 S - .-NHAM ST 8855 SW OMARA ST PO BO 3•:s TIGARD, OR 97223 T =•RD, OR 972 • 2S102DA-00701 2S102DA-00500 TIGARD CHRISTIAN CHURCH TIGARD-TUALATIN SCHOOL 13405 SW HALL BLVD DISTRICT#23J TIGARD, OR 97223 6960 SW SANDBURG ST TIGARD,OR 97223 2S110 BA-00401 2S102D8-02700 TIGARD . OF TIMM CARREN A 131 W H• BLVD 13488 SW CHELSEA LP GARD, OR 972 ' TIGARD, OR 97223 S102DB-00500 2S102DB-00604 TIG•'P C OF TOMBLESON DANICE LLOYDE 1312 • It -•LL BLVD 8825 SW O'MARA ST ARD,OR 9 - TIGARD, OR 97223 2 102DA-00703 2S102DB-00100 TIGA- • CITY 0- VERIZON NORTHWEST INC 13125 S ` • BLVD PO BOX 152206 TIG: a, OR 9722 IRVING,TX 75015 • 2S i 02DB-02900 ZHANG CHINGSHENG 13416 SW CHELSEA LOOP TIGARD,OR 97223 • Nathan and Ann Murdock Mildren Design Group PO Box 231265 Attn: Gene Mildren Tigard, OR 97281 7650 SW Beveland Street, Suite 120 Tigard, OR 97223 Sue Rorman Susan Beilke 11250 SW 82nd Avenue 11755 SW 114th Place Tigard, OR 97223 Tigard, OR 97223 Naomi Gallucci 11285 SW 78th Avenue Tigard, OR 97223 Diane Baldwin 3706 Kinsale Lane SE Olympia, WA 98501 Brad Spring 7555 SW Spruce Street Tigard, OR 97223 Alexander Craghead 12205 SW Hall Boulevard Tigard, OR 97223-6210 Gretchen Buehner 13249 SW 136th Place Tigard, OR 97224 John Frewing 7110 SW Lola Lane Tigard, OR 97223 CPO 4B 16200 SW Pacific Highway, Suite H242 Tigard, OR 97224 CPO 4M Pat Whiting 8122 SW Spruce Tigard, OR 97223 CITY OF TIGARD - EAST INTERESTED PARTIES (i:\curpin\setup\labels\CIT East.doc) UPDATED: 12-Dec-06 Josh Thomas Susa• Beilke 10395 SW Bonanza 11755 %:I 114th Place Tigard, OR 97224 T►.rd, OR ' 23 Gre . en Buehn:r 13249 h Place Tigar•, OR 9 ,24 Paul Owen 10335 SW Highland Drive Tigard, OR 97224 Tim Esau PO Box 230695 Tigard, OR 97281 C" 4B - 16200 vi •- ific Highway, Suite H242 Ti•- o, OR 97224 Ross Sundberg 16382 SW 104th Avenue Tigard, OR 97224 Brian Wegener 9830 SW Kimberly Drive Tigard, OR 97224 Joseph Dyar 10285 SW Highland Drive Tigard, OR 97224-4668 Rex Caffall 13205 SW Village Glenn Tigard, OR 97223 J. • Frewin4- 7110 'T'l ola Lane 'gait, OR • 23 CITY OF TIGARD - SOUTH INTERESTED PARTIES lov. I of 11 li:\curoln\setup\labels\CIT South.docl UPDATED: 12-Dec-06 • .+ IN I I AFFIDAVIT OF POSTING NOTICE OF A LAND USE PROPOSAL IMPORTANT NOTICE: THIS AFFIDAVIT MUST BE ACCOMPANIED BY A COPY OF THE NOTICE THAT WAS POSTED ON THE SITE. In the Matter of the Proposed Land Use Applications for. Land Use File Nos.: SDR2006-00005 Land Use File Name: TIGARD SKATE PARK I, Cheryl Gaines,Assistant Planner for the City of Tigard,do affirm that I posted notice of the land use proposal affecting the land located at (state the approximate location(s) IF no address(s) and/or tax lot(s) currently registered) l3 l a 5 (set) deal 1 3 1v d s- 8 7 a 0 S w 3 harp LS}Y e'eJ . , and did personally post notice of the proposed land use application(s) by means of weatherproof posting in the general vicinity of the affected territory, a copy of said notice being hereto attached and by reference made a part hereof, on the 20 day of i-eA n tit a ,2007. a. C( Signatu of Person Who Performed Posting h:Vogin\patty\masters\affidavit of posting for applicant to post public heating.doc - TIGARD SKATE PARK - SITE DEVELOPMENT REVIEW (SDR) 2006-00005 . REQUEST: The applicant is requesting approval to construct a 15,000 square-foot skate park on the City Hall site. The site consists of three parcels that total 9.84 acres. LOCATION: 13125 SW Hall Boulevard, Washington County Tax Map 2S102DA, Tax Lot 400 and 401; and 8720 SW Burnham Street; Washington County Tax Map 2S102DA, Tax Lot 200. ZONE: CBD: Central Business District. The CBD zor,_Ag district is designed to provide a concentrated central business district, centered on the City's historic downtown, including a mix of civic, retail and office uses. Single-family attached housing, at a maximum density of 12 units/net acre, equivalent of the R-12 zoning district, and multi-family housing at a minimum density of 32 units/acre, equivalent to the R-40 zoning district, are permitted outright. A wide range of uses, including but not limited to adult entertainment, utilities, facilities with drive-up windows, medical centers, major event entertainment and gasoline stations, are permitted conditionally. APPLICABLE REVIEW CRITERIA: Community Developni_at Code Chapters 18.360, 18.390, 18.520, 18.705, 18.725, 18.745, 18.755, 18.765, 18.780, 18.790, 18.795 and 18.810. Further information may be obtained from the Planning Division (staff contact: Cheryl Caines, Assistant Planner) at 13125 SW Hall Blvd., Tigard, Oregon 97223, or by calling 503-639-4171 or by email to Cherylc @ tgard-or.gov. A copy of the application and all documents and evidence submitted by or on behalf of the applicant and the applicable criteria are available for inspection at no cost and copies for all items can also be provided at a reasonable cost. I v •'y� �C qw r S CITY of TIGARD 'fr . 'A2 S� GEOGRAPHIC INFORMATION 9Y8TEN . P.� AREA NOTIFIED 1111 IV • 1,0• (500') 40# /P9' l'i, II wow FOR: Tigard Skate Pk. /` RE: 2S 102DA; 200/400/401 • K ... . 01k. \lii‘ tlttwtww 31014007700 44 111111 \ Property owner information `\ t valid for months from ■'‘N : the date pri nted on this map. 31020500100 4 sinumwass �; >° 4.. AleN '�,� LP 31020003300 I u•11.811111 OP010u00 751070003700 ' N Mai 781B701071i true- 1 1419191111/81 I It$ ` ,� 0 100 200 300 400 500 Feet ���= I ST . .■ 1S131e0ai3m =••RA ,,. w p1111W1 ■. . IPII00 W3 751020001501 31020001400 751010000100 � � •Mean 1 31o7ooa13oo . Tlcnxn I Information on this map is for general location only and . , should be verified with Me Development Sernces Division. 13125 SW Hall Blvd __� Tigard,OR 97223 J (303)1339-4171 . i ..J °0 � htlp:/t ci.tigerd.or.us Community Development Plot date:Jan 11,2007;C:lmagicWIAGIC03.APR 2S f 02DB-00602 2S102DB-04900 BEDOLLA KAREN R HEDLUND TED B& 8915 SW O'MARA ST ZIMMER JOANNE M TIGARD, OR 97223 13331 SW CHELSEA LP TIGARD,OR 97224 2S10200-01500 2S10200-01400 BLICK CARL J DONA JEAN HOLSTEIN MARVIN R/LORETTA R TRS 8740 SW O'MARA 8710 SW OMARA TIGARD,OR 97223 TIGARD,OR 97223 2S 102AD-02200 2S 102DB-03500 BURNHAM BUSINESS&STORAGE LLC ISOM DAVID BRYAN AND 9500 SW BARBUR BLVD STE 300 BARBARA JO PORTLAND,OR 97219 13391 SW CHELSEA LOOP TIGARD,OR 97223 02DB-00 0 2S101CB-00400 BUR BUSINESS&STORAGE LLC JEMPAK PARTNERS LLC 950 W RBUR BLVD STE 300 7034 SW 83RD AVE RTLAND,OR 97219 PORTLAND,OR 97223 2S 102D B-02800 2S 102D D-01300 BYRNE JAMES G&DIANNE V KRAEMER JULIA A&MARK W 13454 SW CHELSEA LOOP PO BOX 80665 TIGARD,OR 97223 PORTLAND,OR 97280 S102DA-0 0 2S102DA-00900 CI TIGARD LOUCKS PATRICIA& 1 5 S ALL BLVD BURTON LUCY IGARD,0 7223 13337 SW HALL BLVD PORTLAND,OR 97223 102DD-00100 2S102DA-00100 CI GARD MAGNO LLC 131 SW L BLVD 8800 SW COMMERICAL ST GARD, OR 97 23 TIGARD,OR 97223 2S 102 D B-03200 2S 102 DA-00300 COGBURN ROBINANN K& MATSUMOTO WILLIAM Y&NINA A FRARY MAUREEN L 8770 SW BURNHAM RD 13348 SW CHELSEA LOOP TIGARD,OR 97223 TIGARD,OR 97223 2S10206-05000 2S102DD-01501 DACUS WILLIAM J&DEBRA S MCANDREW JOHN W&ANGELA D 13322 SW CHELSEA LP 8830 SW OMARA ST TIGARD,OR 97223 TIGARD,OR 97223 2S102DB-03000 2S102DB-03100 HARBISON PATRICK N&ERICA L MERRICK DONALD L&CAROL J 13404 SW CHELSEA LP 13376 SW CHELSEA LP TIGARD,OR 97223 TIGARD,OR 97223 2S1'02DB-00603 2S1020A-00704 OTTING LOIS E TI D CI OF 8885 SW O'MARA ST 13125 HALL BLVD TIGARD,OR 97223 ARD,OR 23 2S102DB-03300 2S1020A-00400 REDFIELD SPENCER D JR& TIG CITY F MARY L 13125 S ALL BLVD 13336 SW CHELSEA LP j D,OR 23 TIGARD, OR 97223 2S1020B-03400 2S 02DA-00402 RYBKA KEVIN P TIGA CI OF 13363 SW CHELSEA LOOP 13125 ALL BLVD TIGARD,OR 97223 T RD,OR 23 2S102DA-00800 2 02DA-00200 SCHALTZ RANDY A&MARGARET C TIG D CI OF 13335 SW HALL BLVD 1312 HALL BLVD TIGARD,OR 97224 T GARD,OR 23 2S102DD-01301 2S102A0-03450 STATE OF OREGON TIGARD WATER DISTRICT /7 TTN; D EvN/s K. DEPARTMENT OF TRASPORTATION 8777 SW BURNHAM ST RIGHT OF WAY SECTION PO BOX 23000 417 TRANSPORTATION BLDG TIGARD,OR 97223 SALEM,OR 97310 2S102DB-00601 2S1 I •D-03451 STEINBICHLER GEORGE& TIGA WATE: •'STRICT SHARILYN 8777 S -NHAM ST 8855 SW OMARA ST PO BO 3101 TIGARD,OR 97223 T -•RD,OR 972 • 2S102DA-00701 2S102DA-00500 TIGARD CHRISTIAN CHURCH TIGARD-TUALATIN SCHOOL 13405 SW HALL BLVD DISTRICT#23J TIGARD,OR 97223 6960 SW SANDBURG ST TIGARD,OR 97223 2S1'•BA-00401 2S102DB-02700 TIGARD OF TIMM CARREN A 131 W H• BLVD 13488 SW CHELSEA LP GARD,OR 972 TIGARD,OR 97223 102DB-00500 2S102DB-00604 TIG• -• C ' OF TOMBLESON DANICE LLOYDE 1312 Tv •LL BLVD 8825 SW O'MARA ST ARD,OR 9 TIGARD,OR 97223 2 102DA-00703 2S102DB-00100 TIG CITY 0 VERIZON NORTHWEST INC 13125 S BLVD PO BOX 152206 TIG ,OR 9722 IRVING,TX 75015 ' 2St02DB-02900 ZHANG CHINGSHENG 13416 SW CHELSEA LOOP TIGARD, OR 97223 • Nathan and Ann Murdock Mildren Design group PO Box 231265 Attn: Gene Mildren Tigard, OR 97281 7650 SW Beveland Street, Suite 120 Tigard, OR 97223 Sue Rorman Susan Beilke 11250 SW 82nd Avenue 11755 SW 114th Place Tigard, OR 97223 Tigard, OR 97223 Naomi Gallucci 11285 SW 78th Avenue Tigard, OR 97223 Diane Baldwin 3706 Kinsale Lane SE Olympia, WA 98501 Brad Spring 7555 SW Spruce Street Tigard, OR 97223 Alexander Craghead 12205 SW Hall Boulevard Tigard, OR 97223-6210 Gretchen Buehner 13249 SW 136th Place Tigard, OR 97224 John Frewing 7110 SW Lola Lane Tigard, OR 97223 CPO 4B 16200 SW Pacific Highway, Suite H242 Tigard, OR 97224 CPO 4M Pat Whiting 8122 SW Spruce Tigard, OR 97223 CITY OF TIGARD - EAST INTERESTED PARTIES (i:lcurpin\setup\labels\CIT East.doc) UPDATED: 12-Dec-06 Josh Thomas Susa Beilke 10395 SW Bonanza 11755 114th Place Tigard, OR 97224 Tigard, OR 23 Gre . en Buehner 13249 h Place Tigard;CA 9 Paul Owen 10335 SW Highland Drive Tigard, OR 97224 Tim Esau PO Box 230695 Tigard, OR 97281 CPO-,4B 16200 ific Highway, Suite H242 Tigard, OR 97224 Ross Sundberg 16382 SW 104th Avenue Tigard, OR 97224 Brian Wegener 9830 SW Kimberly Drive Tigard, OR 97224 Joseph Dyar 10285 SW Highland Drive Tigard, OR 97224-4668 Rex Caffall 13205 SW Village Glenn Tigard, OR 97223 Jo Frewin 7110 ola Lane .gard, OR 7223 CITY OF TIGARD - SOUTH INTERESTED PARTIES fog. I of 11 (i:\curoln\setuollabels\CIT South.docl UPDATED: 12-Dec-06 dwneYs d-�re(je r a S 2S102DA-00400 D 14- , /D 7 TIGARD CITY OF ` 13125 SW HALL BLVD TIGARD,OR 97223 2S102DA-00401 TIGARD CITY OF 13125 SW HALL BLVD TIGARD,OR 97223 2S102DA-00200 TIGARD CITY OF 13125 SW HALL BLVD TIGARD, OR 97223 APPLICANT MATERIALS - s PRE-APP.HELD BY: CITY OF TIGARD PLANNING DIVISION` ' VELA 13125 SW HALL BOULEVARD L 1 TIGARD, OR 97223-8189 AUG ' 4 2006 lII'� CITY OF TIGARD CITY OREGON LAND USE PERMIT APPLICATION PLANNIN i N icARD RING File# Other Case # Date 8'a 4-OP Bye Receipt# , City x Urb Date Complete -19-07 TYPE OF PERMIT YOU ARE APPLYING FOR ❑ Adjustment/Variance (I or II) ❑ Minor Land Partition (II) ❑ Zone Change (III) ❑ Comprehensive Plan Amendment (IV) ❑ Planned Development (III) ❑ Zone Change Annexation (IV) ❑ Conditional Use (Ill) ❑ Sensitive Lands Review I, II or III)) ❑ Zone Ordinance Amendment (IV) ❑ Historic Overlay (II or III) j2j Site Development Review (II) ❑ Home Occupation (II) ❑ Subdivision (II or III) LOCA I ION WHERE PROPOSED AC I IVI I Y WILL OCCUR(Address it available) ) 2-C SW Pal I alvd. I AX MAP& I AX LU I NOS. 29 I42D4 - ooLlop TO I AL SI I E SIZE ZONING CLASSIFICA1 ION • 'IL ctcv-es (T7. 400) ; qirtepclk=1570oo s.� C B4) APPLICAN I* CG i j ofF 17 ctvc Pavks Dex +wA.e,iA,-f- MAILING AL) tE 'S/CI I Y/S I A IE/IP PHONE 13 \2S SW -k 1 B1 . -1-Thj c © �O 1 7 3 AX NO. CO3 71 — 2 O PRIMARY CON TALI PERSON PHONE NU. Dam Plaza , Pat'les '-Rai ItI'es PROPE I Y OWNER/DEED HOLDER(Attach fist if more than one) C I o f T and MAILING6)DRESS/CI I Y/ ' TE/LIP 13 \2c S LN 1 I �tvc'. � , ©R C 7223 PHONE NO. FAX NO. *When the owner and the applicant are different people, the applicant must be t.4 purchaser of record or a lessee in possession with written authorization from the owner or an agent of the owner. TheLulniners must sign this application in the space provided on the back of this form or submit a written authorization with this application. PROPOSAL SUMMARY(Please be specific) klft.V 15,000 51 umve -Prof skt+epetvk Wt asfo ktkrisecirtvi ateci rt1,1,1'),J 10+ I'm rVe%.W M'l fc APPLICATIONS WILL NOT BE ACCEPTED WITHOUT ALL OF THE REQUIRED SUBMITTAL ELEMENTS AS DESCRIBED IN THE "BASIC SUBMITTAL REQUIREMENTS" INFORMATION SHEET. THE APPLICANT SHALL CER LOY THAT: I ♦ If the application is granted,the applicant shall exercise the rights granted in accordance with the terms and subject to all the conditions and limitations of the approval. • All the above statements and the statements in the plot plan,attachments,and exhibits transmitted herewith, are true;and the applicants so acknowledge that any permit issued,based on this application,map be revoked if it is found that any such statements are false. • The applicant has read the entire contents of the application,including the policies and criteria,and understands the requirements for approving or denying the application(s). SIGNATURES OF EACH OWNER OF THE SUBJECT PROPERTY ARE REQUIRED. 7/2 YAI 7 Owner's Si ature Date p._.A I 'ROSS E ,C.c-r ' 14.1`N'4t - R-. Owner's Signature Date Owner's Signature Date Owner's Signature Date Owner's Signature Date Applic. Agent/R tative's Signature Date A', sq. /— a 5 - 07 Applicant/Agent/Representative's Signature Date CITY OF TIGARD 104 9/14/2006 e 13125 SW Hall Blvd. 3:38PM Tigard,OR 97223 (503)639-4171 Payment History For TIGARD Case#: SDR2006-00005 Recorded Type Fee ID# Description Fees Paid Date Paid Check# Receipt# By Due History PRMT 200608301404551510 [LANDUS] SDR Under 3,759.00 3,759.00 9/7/2006 N/A JE 77 DLH 0.00 $1,000,000 LRP1 200608301405300250 [LRPF] LR Planning 555.00 555.00 9/7/2006 N/A JE 77 DLH 0.00 Surcharge Total Fees: $4,314.00 Paid: $4,314.00 TOTAL REMAINING DUE: $0.00 Page 1 of I CasePavmentllistory..rpt _General Ledger Journal Entry Proof List Iprij User:phyllis TIGARD Printed:09/07/2006- 8:56 AM Account Number Account Description Debit Amount Credit Amount Line Description System Reference Project Management Journal Entry:000077 03 2007 Journal Entry Date:09/07/2006 System:General Ledger I00-0000-101000 Cash&Investments 4,314.00 0.00 Skatepark Permit/SDR 2006-00005 100-0000-438000 Land Use Application Fee 0.00 3,759.00 Skatepark Permit/SDR 2006-00005 100-0000-438050 Long Range Planning Surcharge 0.00 555.00 Skatepark Permit/SDR 2006-00005 Fund Total 4,314.00 4,314.00 Fund Balance 0.00 225-0000-101000 Cash&Investments 0.00 4,314.00 Skatepark Pemiit/SDR 2006-00005 225-6400-754036 Skateboard Park-Acquire/Design 4,314.00 0.00 Skatepark Permit/SDR 2006-00005 Fund Total 4,314.00 4,314.00 Fund Balance 0.00 Journal Entry Totals 8,628.00 8,628.00 Journal Entry Balance 0.00 GL-Journal Entry Proof List(Printed:09/07/2006- 8:56 AM) Page I Account Number Account Description Debit Amount Credit Amount Line Description System Reference Project Management Report Totals 8,628.00 8,628.00 Report Balance 0.00 GL-Journal Entry Proof List(Printed: 09/07/2006- 8:56 AM) Page 2 Phyllis Harris- Re: sk8 project cost Page 1 • • From: Cheryl Caines Aac/37 To: Dumdi, Jaime; Plaza, Daniel Date: 8/30/2006 2:15:05 PM Subject: Re: sk8 project cost Dan, Have you already requested the journal entry? If not,that needs to come from PW and not Plannng. The account numbers/amounts follow: 100-0000-438000 $3,759.00 .5D22 c ~Lam` A �; ��100-0000-438050 $ 555.00 Id O bkerIK Total $4,314.00 Please have finance forward a copy of the journal entry to Dianna Howse so she can pay the fees in Tidemark. Thank you. >>> Daniel Plaza 08/30 9:09 AM >>> $423,600 ben s.enformed me that the fee was 4,184 this amount was given to jaime dumdi Thanks Dan Plaza Parks and Facilities Manager City of Tigard 503 718 2590 daniel a(�tigard-or.gov CC: Harris, Phyllis; Howse, Dianna �J x`03 ti 4U4I402 STATUTt WARRANTY DEED a Richard Norman Sturgis, Trustee for Lila L. Sturgis _, Grantor, conveys and warrants to i y o agar , Grantee. the following described real property free of liens and encumbrances, except as specifically set forth herein: An undivded 2 3/4% interest in the following described property: Legal Description described on Exhibit A attached hereto and RECEIVED made a part hereof. AUG 2 4 2006 . CITY OF TIGARD . • PLANNING/ENGINEERING This property is free of liens and encumbrances, EXCEPT: Statutory powers and assessments of Unified Sewerage Agency; Easements of Record; Sewer Line Agreement recorded January 23, 1979, Fee No. 79 003004. The true consideration for this conveyance is S 15.090.00 d DATE. this (1 day of a •• 19 ILL-// -ic a • rorman : $' •1: rustee for Lila St • s Multnomah CORPORATE ACKNOWLEDGMENT STATE OF OREGON,County of )ss. STATE OF OREGON, County of )ss. The for instrument avctoa kripwledged begire The foregoing instrument was acknowledged before me this day of 19 me this day of 19 by Ri c'hnrrl 14_ _Csi"itrgi R. Trust-pp by and by of , a corporation,on behalf of the corporation. Notary Public for Oregon Notary Public for Oregon My commission expires: /Z,/J1 My commission expires: SEAL SEAL • TFitS SPACE RESERVED FOR RECORDER'S USE Title Order No. 351853 Escrow No. 84111 A.rler Iecording return to: Eirst...American..._Ti.tle....Tnx...Ca.,__._..._..._..... i 310 S. .W. .4th.. ..__ _..w..._..._._.._�._._._... .. Portland,._OR .91204. .......... NAME.ADDRESS,ZIP Umil a.•hankie is requested all uN sraimsems stall be sun ID she klUDISINI address. NAME, ADDRESS,ZIP 1 -d -- IO7Z6ILEOS xauud ld pue2t1 WUZS =OI 900Z z2 2nd • S s • • EXHIBIT "A" • That tract of land situated in the County of Washington and State of Oregon, described as follows; Fart of the W.W. Graham Donation Land Claim No. 39, Township 2 South, Range 1 West of the Willamette Meridian, conveyed by Gay N. Bybee, et ux, to John Mackie, et ux by deed dated Pebruary 7, 1920, and recorded at page 530, in book 114, Records of , Deeds for Washington County, Oregon. Beginning at a point on the West line of said Mackie tract from which the Southwest corner of the East half of the George Richardson Donation Land Claim No. 38 bears North 2. 26' East 182. 7 feet and North 16' 33' West 211 feet and North 43' East 1235.5 feet from said beginning point; running thence South 89' 00' East 499.7 feet to the canter of County Road No. 227; thence in center of said road South 1' 30' West 377.0 feet to the recongnized Southeast corner of said Mackie tract; thence South 78' 55' West 308.0 feet; thence South 11' 45' East 42. 2 feet; thence South 78' 15' West 33.0 feet: thence North 11. 45' West 42.2 feet; thence South 79' 42' West 178. 5 feet to a atone at the recongized Southwest corner of said Mackie tract: thence North 2. 26' East 483.9 feet to the place of beginning. STATE OF OREGON 88 County of WasMnaton f,Donald W.Mason,Olry for 91 Assessment and TaxetIQn and EA-OHlcfo Reconier Of Con- veyances fie Bail oour*,do hereby certify that the within kj.trumeni.of wrNlop was received and recnttled in b'nokhrreea►Ctotlal4county. liOf: q. nald W. liaeon,'Director of .. -Aswssrnenu-Ind.-Taxalton,Ex- :. ONklo Chief Osp4ty Clerk 9.504. . 19 BL,OCT 22 AM I I: 07 • 7 •d i0172BiLE0S xauud fed PJe2Tj Wd2S :OT 9002 22 2nd AJctrrct+, ve Tigard Skatepark REcevED Site Development Review JAN o 4 2007 CITv pLA NNING/�Ai l:NEED NC APPLICANT: City of Tigard Parks 13125 SW Hall Boulevard Tigard, OR 97223 Contact: Dan Plaza Phone: (503) 718-2590 REPRESENTED BY: Winterbrook Planning 310 SW Fourth Avenue, Suite 1100 Portland, Oregon 97204 Contact: Ben Schonberger Phone: (503) 827-4422 APPLICATION: Site Development Review LOCATION: 13125 SW Hall Boulevard LEGAL DESCRIPTION: 2S102DA-00400 ZONING: Central Business District(CBD) DATE: January 3, 2007 (Original submittals August 23, September 13, December 12) 1 Table of Contents Proposal 2 Existing Conditions 3 Site Development Review(18.360) 3 Impact Study (18.390) 7 Transportation 7 Bikeways 8 Drainage 8 Parks 8 Water 8 Sewer 9 Noise 9 Commercial Zoning Districts (18.520) 9 Access (18.705) 10 Environmental Performance Standards (18.725) 12 Landscaping and Screening (18.745) 13 Parking(18.765) 16 CWS Buffer Standards 25 Signs (18.780) 25 Tree Removal (18.790) 26 Clear Vision Area(18.795) 27 Street and Utility Improvement Standards (18.810) 27 Streets and Sidewalks (030 and 070) 27 Public Use Areas (080) 28 Sanitary Sewer (090) 28 Drainage (100) 28 Bikeways (110) 28 Water and Other Utilities (120) 29 Conclusion 29 Proposal Tigard Parks Department proposes to build a 15,000 square foot public skatepark at the location shown on the attached site plan. The skatepark itself will be located entirely within tax lot 400. The primary vehicular access to the skatepark will be via SW Burnham Street to the north. The parking area for the skatepark will be located in the current Niche Building lot, to the north of the proposed skatepark site. Pedestrian entrances into the skatepark structure will be from the Niche lot. Parking for skatepark users is not prohibited in other civic center parking areas, therefore, there are some circulation impacts to tax lots 200 and 401. As shown in the included elevation drawings, there will be a four-foot fence on the perimeter of the skatepark structure to provide a safety barrier between skatepark users and adjacent areas. 2 Existing Conditions The proposed site for the Tigard Skatepark is within the parking area of the City of Tigard civic complex. The civic complex parking area currently consists of 266 parking spaces that serve the following uses: City Hall, the Permit Center, the Police Station, Niche, and two modular office buildings. The proposed skatepark site is bordered to the north by SW Burnham Street, to the east by SW Hall Boulevard, to the south by a pedestrian walkway adjacent to the main entry drive to the Civic Center, and the west by the Police Department parking area. Current zoning for the area is Central Business District (CBD). "Community Recreation" is an outright permitted use in the zone. SW Burnham Street, the main access to the proposed park, is classified in the Tigard Transportation System Plan as a collector street. SW Hall Boulevard, which bounds the site to the east, is an arterial. Site Development Review (18.360) 18.360.090 Approval Criteria A. Approval criteria. The Director shall make a finding with respect to each of the following criteria when approving, approving with conditions, or denying an application: 1. Compliance with all of the applicable requirements of this title including Chapter 18.810, Street and Utility Standards; Response: Compliance with the applicable requirements of this title is demonstrated through the narrative and graphic submittals contained in this memo and previous application materials. The requirements of 18.810 are addressed on page 26 of this memo. 2. Relationship to the natural and physical environment: a. Buildings shall be: (1) Located to preserve existing trees, topography and natural drainage where possible based upon existing site conditions; Response: The skatepark proposal removes three trees from two landscape islands in the existing parking area. Neither of these trees are large enough to qualify for mitigation under the code. The existing topography and natural drainage of the skatepark site has already been altered by the existing parking area. The proposed design for the skatepark does not substantially change the drainage patterns of the existing site conditions. (2) Located in areas not subject to ground slumping or sliding; Response: The topography of the skatepark site is generally flat, and is not subject to ground slumping or sliding. (3) Located to provide adequate distance between adjoining buildings for adequate light, air circulation, and fire-fighting; and 3 Response: The proposed skatepark is located 150 feet from the City Hall building and 60 feet from the Niche Building, as shown on the site plan. These large distances, and the open, park- like nature of the skatepark structure provides adequate distance for light, air, circulation and firefighting. (4) Oriented with consideration for sun and wind Response: The proposed skatepark is an open, public park. Parks are open to sun and wind as part of the outdoor, park experience. As shown on the site plan, the park will be partially shaded by trees to the north and east. b. Trees shall be preserved to the extent possible. Replacement of trees is subject to the requirements of Chapter 18.790, Tree Removal. Response: Three trees are being removed as part of the skatepark project. None of the three trees proposed for removal are large enough to qualify for mitigation under the tree code, so replacement under the requirements of 18.790 is not necessary. Findings for the tree removal section of the city code are found on page 25 of this memo. Nevertheless, the skatepark project also proposes to plant nine new trees to satisfy parking lot landscaping requirements, as shown on the site plan. 3. Exterior elevations: a. Along the vertical face of single-family attached and multiple family structures, offsets shall occur at a minimum of every 30 feet by providing any two of the following: (I) Recesses, e.g., decks,patios, entrances,floor area, of a minimum depth of eight feet; (2) Extensions, e.g., decks, patios, entrances,floor area, of a minimum depth of eight feet, a maximum length of an overhang shall be 25 feet;and (3) Offsets or breaks in roof elevations of three or more feet in height. Response: The skatepark is not a single family attached or multiple family structure. This criterion does not apply. 4. Buffering, screening and compatibility between adjoining uses: a. Buffering shall be provided between djerent types of land uses,for example, between single-family and multiple family residential,and residential and commercial uses, and the followingfactors shall be considered in determining the adequacy of the type and extent of the buffer: (1) The purpose of the buffer,for example to decrease noise levels, absorb air pollution,filter dust, or to provide a visual barrier; (2) The size of the buffer required to achieve the purpose in terms of width and height; (3) The direction(s)from which buffering is needed; (4) The required density of the buffering; and (5) Whether the viewer is stationary or mobile. Response: The proposed skatepark is a park use that is located entirely within a tax lot that is in the Central Business District zone, and is surrounded by commercial uses. The noise and activity generated from the park use will not be quantitatively greater than the normal activities of the existing approved use, which is a parking lot. However, the design of the skatepark includes a buffer on each of its four sides: existing landscape strips to the north, east, and south, and a newly proposed buffer to the west, as shown on the site plan. 4 b. On site screening from view from adjoining properties of such things as service areas, storage areas, parking lots, and mechanical devices on roof tops, i.e., air cooling and heating systems, shall be provided and the following factors will be considered in determining the adequacy of the type and extent of the screening: (1) What needs to be screened; (2) The direction from which it is needed; (3) How dense the screen needs to be; (4) Whether the viewer is stationary or mobile;and (5) Whether the screening needs to be year around. Response: No service areas, storage areas, or mechanical devices are associated with the skatepark. The parking area for the skatepark is to the north in the Niche lot, and its screening from adjoining properties is unchanged by the proposal. Because the skatepark replaces the parking area adjacent to SW Hall Boulevard, the view from the property across Hall Boulevard will be more screened than existing conditions. 5. Privacy and noise: multi family or group living uses: 1***1 6. Private outdoor area: multi family use: 1-***1 7. Shared outdoor recreation areas: multi family use: 1***1 8. Where landfill and/or development is allowed within and adjacent to the 100 year floodplain, the City shall require consideration of the dedication of sufficient open land area for greenway adjoining and within the floodplain. This area shall include portions at a suitable elevation for the construction of a pedestrian/bicycle pathway within the floodplain in accordance with the adopted pedestrian/bicycle plan. 1***1 Response: The skatepark is not a multi-family use, a group living use, or within the 100 year floodplain. These criteria do not apply. 9. Demarcation of public, semi-public and private spaces for crime prevention: a. The structures and site improvements shall be designed so that public areas such as streets or public gathering places, semi-public areas and private outdoor areas are clearly defined to establish persons having a right to be in the space, to provide for crime prevention and to establish maintenance responsibility;and b. These areas may be defined by, but not limited to: (I)A deck,patio, low wall, hedge, or draping vine; (2)A trellis or arbor; (3)A change in elevation or grade; (4)A change in the texture of the path material; (5)Sign; or (6) Landscaping. Response: The skatepark will be a City of Tigard park, open to the public. It will not have night lighting, and will operate only during daylight hours. The hours of operation will be clearly marked. The perimeter of the park will be fenced to restrict access during night hours. Maintenance and upkeep will be provided by the City Public Works department. The presence of 5 the Tigard Police headquarters 250 feet from the park is expected to add to crime prevention at the facility. 10. Crime prevention and safety: a. Windows shall be located so that areas vulnerable to crime can be surveyed by the occupants; b. Interior laundry and service areas shall be located in a way that they can be observed by others; c. Mail boxes shall be located in lighted areas having vehicular or pedestrian traffic; d. The exterior lighting levels shall be selected and the angles shall be oriented towards areas vulnerable to crime; and e. Light fixtures shall be provided in areas having heavy pedestrian or vehicular traffic and in potentially dangerous areas such as parking lots, stairs, ramps and abrupt grade changes. Fixtures shall be placed at a height so that light patterns overlap at a height of seven feet which is sufficient to illuminate a person. Response: These criteria do not specifically apply. The lighting of parking areas that abut the park will not change. The park will be closed during evening hours. 11. Public transit: a. Provisions within the plan shall be included for providing for transit if the development proposal is adjacent to or within 500 feet of existing or proposed transit route; b. The requirements for transit facilities shall be based on: (1) The location of other transit facilities in the area; and (2) The size and type of the proposal. c. The following facilities may be required after City and Tri-Met review: (1) Bus stop shelters; (2) Turnouts for buses; and (3) Connecting paths to the shelters. Response: SW Hall Boulevard is an existing transit route, and the siting of the facility was in part because of this access. It is anticipated that many skatepark users will access the site via the bus on SW Hall Boulevard. 12. Landscaping: a. All landscaping shall be designed in accordance with the requirements set forth in Chapter 18.745; b. In addition to the open space and recreation area requirements of subsections 5 and 6 above, a minimum of 20 percent of the gross area including parking, loading and service areas shall be landscaped; and c. A minimum of 15 percent of the gross site area shall be landscaped. Response: The landscaping to be installed around the base of the skatepark structure as shown in the site plan complies with the standards of 18.745. The overall site is 29% landscaped area, well in excess of the requirements of b and c above. The amount of landscaping on tax lot 400, when the existing landscape buffers to the east and north are included, also exceeds the minimum area requirements. 13. Drainage: All drainage plans shall be designed in accordance with the criteria in the adopted 1981 master drainage plan; 6 Response: A drainage plan has been prepared by Sisul Engineering, and submitted with the application. The drainage proposed for the site is in accordance the Tigard's drainage master plan. 14. Provision for the disabled: All facilities for the disabled shall be designed in accordance with the requirements set forth in ORS Chapter 447; and Response: Access to the skatepark complies with all relevant Americans with Disabilities Act requirements. A new ADA-compliant parking space will be provided in the Niche lot, as shown on the site plan. 15. All of the provisions and regulations of the underlying zone shall apply unless modified by other sections or this title, e.g., Planned Developments, Chapter 18.350; or a variance or adjustment granted under Chapter 18.370. Response: No variances or adjustments are requested as part of this application. The skatepark complies with all the standards of the CBD zone. Impact Study (18.390) An impact study is required, and is described in the code as follows: 18.390.040.B.2.e The impact study shall quantify the effect of the development on public facilities and services. The study shall address, at a minimum, the transportation system, including bikeways, the drainage system, the parks system, the water system, the sewer system, and the noise impacts of the development. For each public facility system and type of impact, the study shall propose improvements necessary to meet City standards and to minimize the impact of the development on the public at large,public facilities systems, and affected private property users. In situations where the Community Development Code requires the dedication of real property interests, the applicant shall either specifically concur with the dedication requirements, or provide evidence which supports the conclusion that the real property dedication requirement is not roughly proportional to the projected impacts of the development. The impact study is broken down into its component parts below. Transportation The anticipated transportation impacts of the Tigard Skatepark will be minor. Because of the age profile of a typical skatepark user, a significant portion of the park users are expected to arrive at the facility via bicycle, bus, or on foot. SW Hall Blvd is an existing transit corridor. The Institue of Transportation Engineers (ITE) Trip Generation manual does not have a category that is directly equivalent to a skate park. A survey of other skateparks in the region found that most of them have been located within existing public parks, and therefore their trip generation rates are folded into the existing park use (e.g., Portland's Pier Park and Glenhaven Park). 7 Looking at other jurisdictions that have comparable trip generation categories is instructive. The San Diego, California, Land Development Code(2003) lists 50 trips per acre as the expected trip generation rate for"Developed Parks" and assigns 4% of those trips to the a.m. peak hour and 8% of those trips to the p.m. peak hour. 50 trips per acre is also the listed rate for"Outdoor Sports Facilities". The proposed skatepark is slightly larger than 1/3 acre, which in this case would generate 18 trips. In comparison, the most recent Oregon Department of Transportion data show an average annual daily trip(AADT) demand of 14,100 trips on SW Hall Boulevard directly south of SW Burnham Street(ODOT 2004 Transportation Volumes tables, p. 106). The small increase in trips generated by the skatepark will be insignificant in comparison. The civic center's frontage on SW Hall is currently improved to three lanes with full curb and sidewalks. The City of Tigard is willing to dedicate land along the frontage of SW Hall Boulevard to accommodate a future widening project. Given the minor increase in trips generated by the skatepark, requiring the applicant remove existing sidewalks and make street improvements is not justified and would not be proportionate to the proposed development. Bikeways SW Hall Boulevard in front of the site is a bikeway as designated on City maps. This facility may be improved further when ODOT widens the road. The City of Tigard is willing to dedicate land along the SW Hall frontage to accommodate a future project. Drainage Drainage that is in compliance with city engineering standards is shown on the attached stormwater plan. Runoff from the skatepark, which is no greater than that of the existing parking area, will be directed to the same connection in the public system under SW Hall Boulevard. Curt Pellatz, P.E., of Sisul Engineering has prepared a storm drainage plan that demonstrates feasibility for the proposed project. Also included with this plan are preliminary storm calculations for the runoff from the site, and detail about the capacity and functioning of the water quality vault that will be installed to the east of the skatepark, in the landscape area. Parks The facility is itself a park, and will contribute to the city's inventory of parkland. Water The skate park does not require any water facilities, nor does it require relocation of any existing water lines. Park users will use the existing restrooms and drinking fountains that are available in the City Hall and Police Department buildings. At some future date, under a different permit, an outdoor drinking fountain may be installed closer to the main skatepark entrance. 8 Sewer The skatepark does not require any sanitary sewer facilities. Signage will direct users of the skatepark to use the Police Department and City Hall restrooms. Noise Noise from the park use will not be significant. Skateboard wheels and voices are the only anticipated noise sources. This level of noise is likely to be less than the existing use of the land as a parking lot, and significantly lower than the ambient traffic noise from Hall Boulevard. Commercial Zoning Districts (18.520) The skatepark is located within Central Business District(CBD) zone, the purpose of which is to provide "a mix of civic, retail, and office uses." The proposed public park is a civic amenity, and is consistent with the purpose of this zone. Specifically, the park is a"Community Recreation"use as defined in the code, and is therefore permitted outright in the CBD zone (Table 18.520.1). The development standards of the CBD zone are listed in Table 18.520.2 and are met by the proposed development as follows: Standard Requirement for CBD zone Skatepark proposal Minimum lot size None Not applicable Minimum lot width None Not applicable Minimum setback None(see footnote 12) Not applicable Minimum building height N/A Not applicable Maximum building height 80 feet Height of skatepark structure does not exceed 8 feet above existing grade Maximum Site Coverage 85% Tax lot 400 has greater than 15% pervious surface with landscaping to east and north. Minimum Landscape 15% Tax lot 400 has greater than 15 Requirements pervious surface with landscaping to east and north Minimum FAR N/A Not applicable Minimum Residential Density N/A Not applicable Maximum Residential Density N/A Not applicable 9 Access (18.705) Primary access to the skatepark is from SW Burnham Street, to the north. This access is existing, and currently serves the Niche Building. Secondary access is via the main civic center entry/exit on SW Hall Boulevard. 18.705.030 General Provisions A. Continuing obligation of property owner. The provisions and maintenance of access and egress stipulated in this title are continuing requirements for the use of any structure or parcel of real property in the City. Response: Access and egress to the site will be maintained by the City of Tigard, the property owner. B. Access plan requirements. No building or other permit shall be issued until scaled plans are presented and approved as provided by this chapter that show how access, egress and circulation requirements are to be fulfilled. The applicant shall submit a site plan. The Director shall provide the applicant with detailed information about this submission requirement. Response: A site plan has been included with this submittal, demonstrating compliance with access, egress, and circulation requirements. C. Joint access. Owners of two or more uses, structures, or parcels of land may agree to utilize jointly the same access and egress when the combined access and egress of both uses, structures, or parcels of land satisfies the combined requirements as designated in this title,provided: Response: Although the access and egress points on SW Burnham and SW Hall will be shared by different office, park, and emergency services uses on the property, there is only one owner— the City of Tigard. A joint access agreement is not necessary under these conditions; this standard does not apply. D. Public street access. All vehicular access and egress as required in Sections 18.705.030H and 18.705.0301 shall connect directly with a public or private street approved by the City for public use and shall be maintained at the required standards on a continuous basis. Response: The primary entrance to the skatepark is from SW Burnham, which is a public street, approved by the City for public use. A secondary entrance is from SW Hall, which is likewise a public street, approved for public use. E. Curb cuts. Curb cuts shall be in accordance with Section 18.810.030N. Response: No new curb cuts are proposed. Existing curb cuts are in compliance with 18.810. F. Required walkway location. On-site pedestrian walkways shall comply with the following standards: *4* 10 Response: The skatepark is a park use that is being placed within an existing parking lot. The existing on-site pedestrian circulation system through the Civic Center parking area will not by altered by the proposed development. As shown on the site plan, the public sidewalk on SW Hall Boulevard borders the site to the east, and an existing on-site walkway borders the site to the south. Either of these on-site pedestrian paths provide connections to adjacent streets, per the requirement of 18.705.030.F. A new entry access into the skate park itself, from the Niche parking lot, will be created as part of this project. G. Inadequate or hazardous access. Response: Access points to the skatepark are existing, and will not be modified as a result of skatepark construction. Lancaster Engineering has provided a letter verifying that the existing access points meet AASHTO standards for sight distance. H. Access Management 1. An access report shall be submitted with all new development proposals which verifies design of driveways and streets are safe by meeting adequate stacking needs, sight distance and deceleration standards as set by ODOT, Washington County, the City and AASHTO (depending on jurisdiction of facility.) 2. Driveways shall not be permitted to be placed in the influence area of collector or arterial street intersections. Influence area of intersections is that area where queues of traffic commonly form on approach to an intersection. The minimum driveway setback from a collector or arterial street intersection shall be 150 feet, measured from the right-of-way line of the intersecting street to the throat of the proposed driveway. The setback may be greater depending upon the influence area, as determined from City Engineer review of a traffic impact report submitted by the applicant's traffic engineer. In a case where a project has less than 150 feet of street frontage, the applicant must explore any option for shared access with the adjacent parcel. If shared access is not possible or practical, the driveway shall be placed as far from the intersection as possible. 3. The minimum spacing of driveways and streets along a collector shall be 200 feet. The minimum spacing of driveways and streets along an arterial shall be 600 feet. 4. The minimum spacing of local streets along a local street shall be 125 feet. Response: The access points to the skatepark are existing, and will not be modified as a result of skatepark construction. Lancaster Engineering has provided a letter verifying that the existing access points meet AASHTO standards for sight distance. I. Minimum access requirements for residential use. *** Response: The site contains no residential uses. This standard is not applicable. J. Minimum access requirements for commercial and industrial use. 1. Vehicle access, egress and circulation for commercial and industrial use shall not be less than 21 as provided in Table 18.705.3; 11 TABLE 18.705.3 VEHICULAR ACCESS/EGRESS REQUIREMENTS: COMMERCIAL AND INDUSTRIAL USES Required Parking Minimum Number of Minimum Access Minimum Pavement Spaces Driveways Required Width 0-99 1 30' 24'curbs required 100+ 2 30' 24'curbs required or 50' 40'curbs required I Response: The site contains commercial (office), emergency services, and park uses. There are more than 100 spaces total on the site. There are two access points to the uses on the site, one from SW Burnham and one from SW Hall. Both of these access points are 30 feet wide or wider, and meet the standard shown above. Environmental Performance Standards (18.725) 18.725.030 Performance Standards A. Noise. For the purposes of noise regulation, the provisions of Sections 7.40.130 through 7.40.210 of the Tigard Municipal Code shall apply. Response: The proposed skatepark will comply with all the relevant sections of the city's noise code. As a park use, the level of noise generated by the facility will be minimal, and likely less than the current use of the property as a parking lot for motor vehicles. In addition, the city's noise code provides and exception for noise that would result from normal use of the skatepark: 7.40.180 Exceptions. The following shall not be considered violations of this article, even if the sound limit specified in Section 7.40.160 is exceeded: A. Non-amplified sounds created by organized athletic or other group activities, when such activities are conducted on property generally used for such purposes, such as stadiums,parks, schools, and athletic fields, during normal hours for such events. B. Visible emissions. Within the commercial zoning districts and the industrial park(IP)zoning district, there shall be no use, operation or activity which results in a stack or other point-source emission, other than an emission from space heating, or the emission of pure uncombined water (steam) which is visible from a property line. Department of Environmental Quality (DEQ) rules for visible emissions (340-21-015 and 340-28-070) apply. Response: The proposed park use will generate no visible emissions, and will comply with all applicable DEQ regulations. C. Vibration. No vibration other than that caused by highway vehicles, trains and aircraft is permitted in any given zoning district which is discernible without instruments at the property line of the use concerned. 12 Response: The proposed park use will generate no vibration detectible from the property line. D. Odors. The emission of odorous gases or other matter in such quantities as to be readily detectable at any point beyond the property line of the use creating the odors is prohibited DEQ rules for odors (340-028-090) apply. Response: The proposed park use will generate no emission of odorous gases that would be detectable from any property line. E. Glare and heat. No direct or sky-reflected glare, whether from floodlights or from high temperature processes such as combustion or welding, which is visible at the lot line shall be permitted, and; 1. There shall be no emission or transmission of heat or heated air which is discernible at the lot line of the source; and 2. These regulations shall not apply to signs or floodlights in parking areas or construction equipment at the time of construction or excavation work otherwise permitted by this title. Response: The proposed park use will generate no heat or glare. The park will not be lighted, and will be closed during night time hours. F. Insects and rodents. All materials including wastes shall be stored and all grounds shall be maintained in a manner which will not attract or aid the propagation of insects or rodents or create a health hazard. Response: No materials or wastes will be stored on the skatepark site. Nothing in the skatepark will attract insects or rodents. Landscaping and Screening (18.745) The skatepark is a public park. Table 18.745.1, which is the matrix that governs the level of buffering required between uses, lists no specific buffering requirements between a park use and a parking area. No buffering is required between parking areas, or between uses that are allowed in the Central Business District zone. The skatepark has been located within the existing landscaped parking area. Existing vegetated buffers to the north, east, and south will be undisturbed by the new development. In addition, the proposed conditions site plan shows that new landscape edges will be placed along the south and west sides of the skatepark, to provide a transition between the active skateboard use areas of the park itself and the adjacent parking area and sidewalk. This is an overall increase in the amount of buffering and screening between uses on the site. Street trees that comply with the city's requirements already exist along SW Hall Boulevard and SW Burnham Street. No change to these trees is proposed as part of the project. The proposal will remove three 10-11 inch Kwanzan cherry trees from two landscape islands in the existing parking area. Neither of these trees are large enough to qualify for mitigation under the tree code. 13 For the reconfigured parking areas in the Niche Building lot and the City Hall North lot, one tree will be planted for every seven spaces, per code requirements. This results in nine new trees planted in the parking area as shown on the site plan. New landscaping for the skatepark is integrated within the existing site and the landscape elements that currently exist for the use. New areas of plantings are shown on the site plan. The proposed landscaping additions to the site are a buffer between the parking area to the west and the skatepark structure, between the on-site pedestrian path to the south and the skatepark structure, and various areas of parking lot landscaping throughout the Niche/Skatepark parking lot and the City Hall North parking lot. The location of the skatepark takes advantage of and maintains current landscape buffers on the site to the east and north of the proposed structure. 18.745.030 General Provisions A. Obligation to maintain._Unless otherwise provided by the lease agreement, the owner, tenant and his agent, if any, shall be jointly and severally responsible for the maintenance of all landscaping and screening which shall be maintained in good condition so as to present a healthy, neat and orderly appearance, shall be replaced or repaired as necessary, and shall be kept free from refuse and debris. B. Pruning required. All plant growth in landscaped areas of developments shall be controlled by pruning, trimming or otherwise so that: 1. It will not interfere with the maintenance or repair of any public utility; 2. It will not restrict pedestrian or vehicular access; and 3. It will not constitute a traffic hazard because of reduced visibility. Response: Landscaping will be maintained by the property owner, the City of Tigard, as outlined above. C. Installation requirements. The installation of all landscaping shall be as follows: I. All landscaping shall be installed according to accepted planting procedures; 2. The plant materials shall be of high grade, and shall meet the size and grading standards of the American Standards for Nurberg Stock(ANSI Z60, 1-1986, and any future revisions); and 3. Landscaping shall be installed in accordance with the provisions of this title. D. Certificate of Occupancy. Certificates of occupancy shall not be issued unless the landscaping requirements have been met or other arrangements have been made and approved by the City such as the posting of a bond. Response: The proposed landscaping will be installed by the City per the requirements listed above. The landscaping will be installed prior to the opening and operation of the skatepark. E. Protection of existing vegetation. Existing vegetation on a site shall be protected as much as possible: 1. The developer shall provide methods for the protection of existing vegetation to remain during the construction process; and 2. The plants to be saved shall be noted on the landscape plans (e.g., areas not to be disturbed can be fenced, as in snow fencing which can be placed around individual trees). Response: The existing rows of trees along SW Hall Boulevard and between the skatepark and Niche parking lot will be preserved and protected. Tree protection fencing will be placed around the trees prior to construction by the City Forester. 14 F. Care of landscaping along public rights-of-way. Appropriate methods for the care and maintenance of street trees and landscaping materials shall be provided by the owner of the property abutting the rights- of-way unless otherwise required for emergency conditions and the safety of the general public. Response: The existing rows of trees along SW Hall Boulevard and SW Burnham will be maintained by the property owner, the City of Tigard. G. Conditions of approval of existing vegetation. The review procedures and standards for required landscaping and screening shall be specified in the conditions of approval during development review and in no instance shall be less than that required for conventional development. Response: There are no requirements for landscaping and screening of the park use listed in Table 18.745.1. This criterion does not apply. H. Height restrictions abutting public rights-of-way. No trees, shrubs or plantings more than 18 inches in height shall be planted in the public right-of-way abutting roadways having no established curb and gutter. Response: No plantings are proposed in the public right of way. 18.745.040 Street Trees A. Protection of existing vegetation.All development projects fronting on a public street,private street or a private driveway more than 100 feet in length approved after the adoption of this title shall be required to plant street trees in accordance with the standards in Section 18.745.040.0. B. Street tree planting list. Certain trees can severely damage utilities, streets and sidewalks or can cause personal injury.Approval of any planting list shall be subject to review by the Director. C. Size and spacing of street trees. *** D. Pruning requirements. Trees, as they grow, shall be pruned to provide at least eight feet of clearance above sidewalks and 13 feet above local street, 15 feet above collector street, and 18 feet above arterial street roadway surfaces. E. Cut and fill around existing trees. Existing trees may be used as street trees if no cutting or filling takes place within the drip-line of the tree unless an adjustment is approved by the Director by means of a Type I procedure, as governed by Section 18.390.030, using approval criteria in Section 18.370.020.C.4.a. Response: As shown in the attached report from Matt Stine, the Tigard City Forester, the landscape area between the proposed skatepark and SW Hall Boulevard already contains a healthy row of sweetgum trees. These trees abutting the skatepark frontage range from 9 to 14 inches in diameter. This row of trees meets all the standards under this section and therefore may be used as to meet the street tree requirement as specified in subsection E above. No cutting or filling will take place within the drip line of any of these trees. F. Replacement of street trees. Existing street trees removed by development projects or other construction shall be replaced by the developer with those types of trees approved by the Director. The replacement trees shall be of a size and species similar to the trees that are being removed unless lesser sized alternatives are approved by the Director. G. Granting of adjustments. Adjustments to the street tree requirements may be granted by the Director by means of a Type I procedure, as regulated in Section 18.390.030, using approval criteria in Section 18.370.020.C.4.b. 15 H. Location of trees near signalized intersections. The Director may allow trees closer to specified intersections which are signalized, provided the provisions of Chapter 18.795, Visual Clearance, are satisfied. Response: No street trees will be removed for the skatepark. No adjustments to these requirements are requested. No trees are proposed near signalized intersections. These standards do not apply. Parking (18.765) The parking area for the skatepark will be closest to its main entrance on the north side, in what is currently the Niche Building parking lot. In addition, the skatepark will be part of the Tigard Civic Center complex, which shares parking. The existing and proposed uses of the civic center that will share parking are the Police Department, City Hall (including municipal court), Permit Center,Niche offices, and the new Skatepark. The civic center complex also commits space to store fleet vehicles, and provides spaces for the new public library, which is south of the civic center on SW Hall Boulevard. To calculate existing supply, actual spaces were counted from aerial photos and field-verified. The fleet vehicle information was provided to Tigard Public Works by Ben Tracy, fleet coordinator for the city. The Library obligation is a condition of approval Tigard land use case file CUP 2003-00001, page 18. To calculate demand, buildings were categorized as follows: Minimum Required Building Square footage Use Category Parking Ratio (18.765.070) Niche 4,000 Office 2.7 spaces/1,000 s.f. City Hall 11,000 Office 2.7 spaces/1,000 s.f. Permit Center 12,000 Office 2.7 spaces/1,000 s.f. Police Department 11,000 Emergency Services 3.0 spaces/1,000 s.f. Modulars 2,900 Office 2.7 spaces/1,000 s.f. Skatepark 15,000 Community Recreation 2.0 spaces/1,000 s.f. The space requirements for the Police and Skatepark uses were reduced by 10 and 20 percent, respectively, because they are secondary and tertiary uses in a multi-use development, per 18.765.030.D.2 and 3. 16 The following table summarizes the code-required parking spaces for the existing and proposed uses, and the additional space commitments. This table has been revised from previous submittals. Proposed Civic Center Vehicular Parking Civic Center Parking Supply Civic Center Parking Demand Niche/Skatepark lot 31 Required Minimums for each use City Hall North lot 63 Niche 11 City Hall South lot 33 City Hall 30 Police lot 82 Permit Center 32 Modulars lot 15 Police Department 30 Modulars 8 Total Supply 224 Skatepark 24 (subtotal required) 134 Existing Supply 266 Fleet Vehicles Net Skatepark impact -42 Police Department 52 Building and Engineering Inspectors 4 General employee use vehicles 5 Mail, IT, Utilities vehicles 3 (subtotal fleet) 64 Other obligations Reserved for library use 16 Total demand 214 Surplus 10 A sketch of how the reconfigured parking areas can accommodate demand is not required, but was submitted with previous application materials. It demonstrated that anticipated demand from the skatepark can co-exist with the anticipated demand from the other aspects of the development. Moreover, in addition to the 10 space surplus that will remain after the introduction to the skatepark, the expansion of the parking lot for the public library is anticipated to occur shortly after completion of the skatepark. This will free up another 16 spaces for general use, and raise the surplus to 26 spaces. City staff raised a question about the classification of the"Town Hall" area of city hall, and whether it is appropriate to classify this space as "office" for the purpose of calculating parking demand. Because this area is used for large gatherings, such as city council meetings for example, the applicant was asked to carve out this square footage (1,575 s.f.) and classify it as a "religious institution," since the space has similar characteristics and parking demand profiles. 17 The parking ratio for a religious institution use is much higher. Although the supply side of the previous table would be unchanged, the demand side would look like the following: Civic Center Parking Demand "Town Hall scenario" Niche 11 City Hall 25 Town Hall 30 Permit Center 32 Police Department 30 Modulars 8 Skatepark 24 (subtotal required) 160 Fleet Vehicles Police Department 52 Building and Engineering Inspectors 4 General employee use vehicles 5 Mail, IT, Utilities vehicles 3 (subtotal fleet) 64 Other obligations Reserved for library use 16 Total demand 240 Deficit -16 In other words, if the Town Hall space in City Hall were classified as a separate use, and this space had the same parking demand profile as a church, it would create a shortage of spaces in the civic center site. This problem can be easily solved through management of the Town Hall space. That is, the applicant would accept a condition of approval that would restrict the use of the Town Hall space in City Hall to "off-peak" hours for parking, i.e., after 5 pm, when the majority of city employees have vacated their spaces in the lot. Specific findings against the city's parking code are below. 18.765.020 Applicability of Provisions A. New construction. At the time of the erection of a new structure within any zoning district, offstreet vehicle parking will be provided in accordance with Section 18.765.070. 18 Response: The proposed skatepark is a new structure that requires additional parking. New spaces are compliant with section 070, as outlined below. E. Building permit conditions. The provision and maintenance of off-street vehicle parking and loading spaces are the continuing obligation of the property owner: 1. No building or other permit shall be issued until plans are presented to the Director to show that property is and will remain available for exclusive use as off-street vehicle parking and loading space;and 2. The subsequent use of property for which the building permit is issued shall be conditional upon the unqualified continuance and availability of the amount of vehicle parking and loading space required by this title; 3. Required vehicle parking shall: a. Be available for the parking of operable passenger vehicles ofresidents,patron and employees only; b. Not be used for storage of vehicles or materials or for the parking of trucks used in conduct of the business or use;and c. Not be rented, leased or assigned to any other person or organization. Response: The City of Tigard will maintain off-street vehicle parking in the reconfigured civic center lot. Required parking will be available for"patrons and employees only" per 3.a above. Fleet vehicles are accounted for separately, and these spaces are provided over and above minimums for patrons and employees. 18.765.030 General Provisions A. Vehicle parking plan requirements. No building or other permit shall be issued until scaled plans are presented and approved as provided by this chapter that show how access, egress and circulation requirements are to be fulfilled. The applicant shall submit a site plan. The Director shall provide the applicant with detailed information about this submission requirement. Response: The site plan shows the location and dimensions of all parking on the site and access/egress to it. B. Location of vehicle parking. The location of off-street parking will be as follows: 1. Off-street parking spaces for single-family and duplex dwellings and single-family attached dwellings shall be located on the same lot with the dwelling(s); 2. Off-street parking lots for uses not listed above shall be located not further than 500 feet from the property line that they are required to serve, measured along the most direct,publicly accessible pedestrian route from the property line with the following exceptions: *** Response: The required civic center parking is for office, emergency services, and community recreation uses. Parking is located on the same lot as the use. C. Joint parking. Owners of two or more uses, structures or parcels of land may agree to utilize jointly the same parking and loading spaces when the peak hours of operation do not overlay, subject to the following: *** Response: No joint parking is requested. The City of Tigard is the only property owner. D. Parking in mixed-use projects. In mixed-use projects, the required minimum vehicle parking shall be determined using the following formula. 19 1. Primary use, i.e., that with the largest proportion of total floor area within the development, at 100%of the minimum vehicle parking required for that use in Section 18.765.060; 2. Secondary use, i.e., that with the second largest percentage of total floor area within the development, at 90%of the vehicle parking required for that use in Section 18.765.060; 3. Subsequent use or uses, at 80%of the vehicle parking required for that use(s)in Section 18.765.060; 4. The maximum parking allowance shall be 150%of the total minimum parking as calculated in D.1.-3. above. Response: The civic center is a mixed use project that will contain three uses. The primary use is office, which applies to the Permit Center, City Hall, Niche, and Modular Buildings. These uses occupy 29,900 square feet of floor area on the site. The secondary use is emergency services, which applies to the Police Station. This use occupies 11,000 square feet off floor area on the site. The tertiary use is "community recreation"which applies to the skatepark. This use will has a footprint of 15,000 square feet on the site. Although the square footage of the skatepark is larger than the floor area of the police station, the skatepark is being considered a tertiary use. This is because its footprint does not meet the definition of"floor area" which is the basis for calculating required parking(See 18.120.030.A.72, 18.765.070.C.4, and Table 18.765.2, footnote 3). Even if the 90%and 80% discounts for secondary and tertiary uses were reversed, the aggregate amount of required parking in the civic center lots would be unchanged. As specified in the parking table, the formulas of subsection D above have been incorporated into the parking requirements for the secondary and tertiary uses. E. Visitor parking in multi-family residential developments. Multi-dwelling units with more than 10 required parking spaces shall provide an additional 15%of vehicle parking spaces above the minimum required for the use of guests of residents of the complex. These spaces shall be centrally located or distributed throughout the development. Required bicycle parking facilities shall also be centrally located within or evenly distributed throughout the development. Response: The proposed use is not multi-family residential. This standard does not apply. F. Preferential long-term carpool/vanpool parking.Parking lots providing in excess of 20 long-term parking spaces shall provide preferential long-term carpool and vanpool parking for employees, students and other regular visitors to the site.At least 5%of total long-term parking spaces shall be reserved for carpool/vanpool use. Preferential parking for carpools/vanpools shall be closer to the main entrances of the building than any other employee or student parking except parking spaces designated for use by the disabled. Preferential carpool/vanpool spaces shall be full-sized per requirements in Section 18.765.040.N and shall be clearly designated for use only by carpools and vanpools between 7:00 AM and 5:30 PM Monday through Friday. Response: The code section above refers to committing a percentage of"long-term" parking spaces that are used by "employees, students and other regular visitors to the site." These spaces may reasonably be considered equivalent to the required minimum parking spaces according to city code, which are based on the square footages of the buildings in the City Hall complex. Required parking is available for"residents, patrons, and employees." (18.765.020.E.3.a.) Extracting from civic center parking table, 134 spaces are needed to accommodate regular visitors to the existing and proposed civic center uses. (Spaces dedicated to fleet vehicles are not 20 included because they do not need carpool accommodations.) Therefore, at 5 percent, 7 carpool/vanpool spaces must be provided. These spaces have been shown on the site plan, and will be signed appropriately for carpool use as part of the skatepark project. G. Disabled-accessible parking. All parking areas shall be provided with the required number of parking spaces for disabled persons as specified by the State of Oregon Uniform Building Code and federal standards. Such parking spaces shall be sized, signed and marked as required by these regulations. Response: The entire City Hall complex, which will have 224 vehicle parking spaces total, must make 6 of these accessible parking spaces. (ADA Standards for Accessible Design 4.1.2[5]) As shown on the site plan, one space in the reconfigured Niche lot, which will serve skatepark users, will be striped and signed for accessibility. Currently, no spaces in the existing Niche lot are marked for accessibility. Four spaces adjacent to City Hall and one space adjacent to the Police Station will satisfy the ADA standard for the other uses on site. H. DEQ indirect source construction permit.All parking lots containing 250 spaces or parking structures containing two or more levels shall require review by the Oregon Department of Environmental Quality(DEQ)to: 1. Acquire an Indirect Source Construction Permit; 2. Investigate the feasibility of installing oil and grease separators. (Ord. 02-13) Response: The proposed civic center lot will contain 224 spaces, and does not have a parking structure. This standard does not apply. 18.765.040 General Design Standards A. Maintenance of parking areas. All parking lots shall be kept clean and in good repair at all times. Breaks in paved surfaces shall be repaired promptly and broken or splintered wheel stops shall be replaced so that their function will not be impaired. Response: The City of Tigard will maintain the parking lot in good repair. B. Access drives. With regard to access to public streets from off-street parking: 1. Access drives from the street to off-street parking or loading areas shall be designed and constructed to facilitate the flow of traffic and provide maximum safety for pedestrian and vehicular traffic on the site; 2. The number and size of access drives shall be in accordance with the requirements of Chapter 18.705, Access, Egress and Circulation; 3. Access drives shall be clearly and permanently marked and defined through use of rails, fences, walls or other barriers or markers on frontage not occupied by service drives; 4. Access drives shall have a minimum vision clearance in accordance with Chapter 18.795, Visual Clearance; 5. Access drives shall be improved with an asphalt or concrete surface;and 6. Excluding single-family and duplex residences, except as provided by Subsection 18.810.030P, groups of two or more parking spaces shall be served by a service drive so that no backing movements or other maneuvering within a street or other public right-of-way will be required. Response: Two access drives serve the civic center parking lots, one from SW Hall, and the other from SW Burnham. These access points comply with the width standards of 18.705, the vision clearance standards of 18.795, and are improved with an asphalt surface. 21 • C. Loading/unloading driveways. A driveway designed for continuous forward flow of passenger vehicles for the purpose of loading and unloading passengers shall be located on the site of any school or other meeting place which is designed to accommodate more than 25 people at one time. D. On-site vehicle stacking for drive-in use. *** E. Curb cuts. Curb cuts shall be in accordance with Section 18.810.030.N F. Pedestrian access. Pedestrian access through parking lots shall be provided in accordance with Section 18.705.030.F. Where a parking area or other vehicle area has a drop-off grade separation, the property owner shall install a wall, railing, or other barrier which will prevent a slow-moving • vehicle or driverless vehicle from escaping such area and which will prevent pedestrians from walking over drop-off edges. G. Parking lot landscaping. Parking lots shall be landscaped in accordance with the requirements of Chapter 18.745. H. Parking space surfacing. 1. Except for single-family and duplex residences, and for temporary uses or fleet storage areas as authorized in 18.765.040.1-1.3 and 4 below, all areas used for the parking or storage or maneuvering of any vehicle, boat or trailer shall be improved with asphalt or concrete surfaces; *** Response: No loading driveways are proposed. No drive-in uses are proposed. No new curb cuts are proposed. Pedestrian access through parking lots is unchanged as a result of skatepark construction, and complied with 18.705, as explained under the findings of that section. The reconstructed areas of the parking lot will be landscaped according to 18.745, as explained in the findings of that section. The parking lot will be paved. I. Parking lot striping. 1. Except for single-family and duplex residences, any area intended to be used to meet the offstreet parking requirements as contained in this chapter shall have all parking spaces clearly marked;and 2. All interior drives and access aisles shall be clearly marked and signed to show direction of flow and maintain vehicular and pedestrian safety. J. Wheel stops. Parking spaces along the boundaries of a parking lot or adjacent to interior landscaped areas or sidewalks shall be provided with a wheel stop at least four inches high located three feet back from the front of the parking stall. The front three feet of the parking stall may be concrete, asphalt or low lying landscape material that does not exceed the height of the wheel stop. This area cannot be calculated to meet landscaping or sidewalk requirements. K. Drainage. Off-street parking and loading areas shall be drained in accordance with specifications approved by the City Engineer to ensure that ponds do not occur except for single-family and duplex residences, off-street parking and loading facilities shall be drained to avoid flow of water across public sidewalks. L. Lighting. A lights providing to illuminate any public or private parking area or vehicle sales area shall be arranged to direct the light away from any adjacent residential district. M Signs. Signs which are placed on parking lots shall be designed and installed in accordance with Chapter 18.780, Signs. N Space and aisle dimensions. (Figure 18.765.1) Response: The included site plan shows that all spaces and isles will be clearly striped. Wheel stops are to be installed as shown, adjacent to landscape areas on the west side of the skatepark and the reconfigured Niche lot. Drainage will be managed per the engineering report provided by Sisul Engineering. There are no residential districts adjacent to the site for light spill to occur. 22 Signs for accessible and carpool parking spaces will be designed and installed in accordance with 18.780. Space and aisle dimensions are shown on the site plan and are compliant with the standards in Table 18.765.1. 18.765.050 Bicycle Parking Design Standards A. Location and access. With regard to the location and access to bicycle parking: I. Bicycle parking areas shall be provided at locations within 50 feet of primary entrances to structures; 2.Bicycle parking areas shall not be located within parking aisles, landscape areas or pedestrian ways; 3. Outdoor bicycle parking shall be visible from on-site buildings and/or the street. When the bicycle parking area is not visible from the street, directional signs shall be used to located the parking area; 4. Bicycle parking may be located inside a building on a floor which has an outdoor entrance open for use and floor location which does not require the bicyclist to use stairs to gain access to the space. Exceptions may be made to the latter requirement for parking on upper stories within a multi-story residential building. B. Covered parking spaces. 1. When possible, bicycle parking facilities should be provided under cover. 2. Required bicycle parking for uses served by a parking structure must provide for covered bicycle parking unless the structure will be more than 100 feet from the primary entrance to the building, in which case, the uncovered bicycle parking may be provided closer to the building entrance. C. Design requirements. The following design requirements apply to the installation of bicycle racks: 1. The racks required for required bicycle parking spaces shall ensure that bicycles may be securely locked to them without undue inconvenience. Provision of bicycle lockers for longterm (employee)parking is encouraged but not required; 2.Bicycle racks must be securely anchored to the ground, wall or other structure; 3. Bicycle parking spaces shall be at least 2%feet by six feet long, and, when covered, with a vertical clearance of seven feet. An access aisle of at least five feet wide shall be provided and maintained beside or between each row of bicycle parking; 4. Each required bicycle parking space must be accessible without moving another bicycle; 5.Required bicycle parking spaces may not be rented or leased except where required motor vehicle parking is rented or leased. At-cost or deposit fees for bicycle parking are exempt from this requirement; 6.Areas set aside for required bicycle parking must be clearly reserved for bicycle parking only. D. Paving. Outdoor bicycle parking facilities shall be surfaced with a hard surfaced material, i.e., pavers, asphalt, concrete or similar material. This surface must be designed to remained welldrained. E. Minimum bicycle parking requirements. The total number ofrequired bicycle parking spaces for each use is specified in Table 18.768.2 in Section 18.765.070.H In no case shall there be less than two bicycle parking spaces. Single-family residences and duplexes are excluded from the bicycle parking requirements. The Director may reduce the number ofrequired bicycle parking spaces by means of an adjustment to be reviewed through a Type II procedure, as governed by Section 18.390.040, using approval criteria contained in Section 18.370.020.C.5.e. Response: As shown on the site plan, a new"wave" bicycle rack will be installed on a parking island next to the Niche building to accommodate skatepark users. This rack is within 50 feet of the skatepark entrance. Table 18.765.2 requires 0.3 bicycle parking spaces per 1,000 square feet of new"Community Recreation" use. The new skatepark structure will occupy 15,000 square feet. Therefore, 4.5 new bicycle parking spaces are required. A standard wave bicycle rack accommodates 5 bicycles. With the installation of this new rack,the code requirement is met. In 23 addition to the proposed skatepark bike rack, two existing "wave" bicycle racks are located in front of the main entrance to City Hall, and bike lockers and another bike rack are located near the Modular Buildings behind the Police Station. 18.765.070 Minimum and Maximum Off-Street Parking Requirements A. Parking requirements for unlisted uses. . I. The Director may rule that a use, not specifically listed in Section 18.765.070.H, is a use similar to a listed use and that the same parking standards shall apply. If the applicant requests that the Director's decision be rendered in writing, it shall constitute a Director's Interpretation, as governed by Section 18.340; 2. The Director shall maintain a list of approved unlisted use parking requirements which shall have the same effect as an amendment to this chapter. B. Choice ofparking requirements. When a building or use is planned or constructed in such a manner that a choice ofparking requirements could be made, the use which requires the greater number of parking spaces shall govern. Response: City staff has indicated that the skatepark should be considered a"community recreation" use for the purposes of the parking code. The minimum required parking calculations reflect this categorization. C. Measurements. The following measurements shall be used in calculating the total minimum number of vehicle parking spaces required in Section 18.765.070.H:: 1. Fractions. Fractional space requirements shall be counted as a whole space; 2. Employees. Where employees are specified for the purpose of determining the minimum vehicle parking spaces required, the employees counted are those who work on the premises during the largest shift at the peak season; 3. Students. When students are specified for the purpose of determining the minimum vehicle parking spaces required, the students counted are those who are on the campus during the peak period of the day during a typical school term; 4. Space. Unless otherwise specified, where square feet are specified, the area measured shall be gross floor area under the roof measured from the faces of the structure, excluding only space devoted to covered off-street parking or loading. Response: All fractional spaces have been rounded up. The minimum space requirements for the three uses on the site are based on square footages, not employees or students. The calculations for all the uses on the site except for the skatepark are based on gross floor area as defined above. As pointed out previously, the skatepark has no"area under the roof' and therefore does not have any floor area as defined by the code. Nevertheless, the applicant is providing space for the skatepark's 15,000 square foot footprint as if it were a covered structure. D. Exclusions to minimum vehicle parking requirements. The following shall not be counted towards the computation of the minimum parking spaces as required in Section 18.765.070.H:: 1. On-street parking. Parking spaces in the public street or alley shall not be eligible as fulfilling any part of the parking requirement except;Religious Institutions may count on-street parking around the perimeter of the use provided that the following criteria have been satisfied: a. The on-street parking is on a street that is designed and physically improved to accommodate parking within the right-of-way; b. The street where on-street parking is proposed is not located on local residential streets. Response: No on-street parking has been included in the minimum required parking calculations. 24 2. Fleet parking.Required vehicle parking spaces may not be used for storage of fleet vehicles, except when a use can show that employee and fleet parking spaces are used interchangeably, e.g., the employee drives the fleet vehicle from home, or the spaces are used for fleet storage only at night and are available for employee use during the day.For the purposes of this title, space exclusively devoted to the storage of fleet vehicles will be considered as outdoor storage. Response: As shown in the minimum required parking table, 64 spaces in the civic center lot are reserved for fleet use. This information was provided to Tigard Public Works by Ben Tracy, fleet coordinator for the city. Although these spaces are frequently available and are not marked as exclusively reserved for fleet vehicles, they are not considered to be available for calculation of minimum parking. E. Exceptions to maximum parking standards. When calculating the maximum vehicle parking allowed as regulated by Section 18.765.080.H, the following exception shall apply: *** F. Reductions in minimum required vehicle parking. Reductions in the required number of vehicle parking spaces may be permitted as follows: *** G. Increases in maximum required vehicle parking. The Director may increase the total maximum number of vehicle spaces allowed in Section 18.765.070.H by means of a parking adjustment to be reviewed by means of a Type II procedure, as governed by Section 18.390.040, using approval criteria contained in section 18.370.020.C.5.d. H. Specific requirements. (See Table 18.765.2) Response: No exceptions to maximums or minimums are requested with this application. The proposed quantity of parking is within the allowable range for the uses proposed. CWS Buffer Standards Clean Water Services has submitted a service provider letter for this project. The nearest sensitive area is distant from proposed skatepark site, south of City Hall. The stormwater drainage system for the skatepark will drain into the same connection in SW Hall Boulevard as the current parking area does, and this area ultimately drains into the creek. However, there will be a net improvement to the water quality of the storm runoff since a park use that prohibits automobiles is replacing an equal amount of pervious surface parking area. Overall, the park project will result in a reduction of impervious surface on the site of approximately 1,500 square feet. Signs (18.780) The signage proposed as part of this application are standard city signs designating accessible and carpool spaces, and a sign on the skatepark entrance indicating hours of operation. Eventually, a skatepark sign will be installed at the southwest corner of the intersection of Hall Boulevard and Burnham Street. The approval for this sign will be sought under a separate land use review, as it may be done in coordination with a rebuilt monument sign indicating the main entrance to City Hall. 25 Tree Removal (18.790) 18.790.030 Tree Plan Requirement A. Tree plan required. A tree plan for the planting,removal and protection of trees prepared by a certified arborist shall be provided for any lot,parcel or combination of lots or parcels for which a development application for a subdivision,partition, site development review,planned development or conditional use is filed. Protection is preferred over removal wherever possible. B. Plan requirements. The tree plan shall include the following: I. Identification of the location, size and species of all existing trees including trees designated as significant by the city; 2. Identification of a program to save existing trees or mitigate tree removal over 12 inches in caliper. Mitigation must follow the replacement guidelines of Section 18.790.060D, in accordance with the following standards and shall be exclusive of trees required by other development code provisions for landscaping, streets and parking lots: a. Retention of less than 25%of existing trees over 12 inches in caliper requires a mitigation program in accordance with Section 18.790.060D of no net loss of trees; b. Retention offrom 25%to 50%of existing trees over 12 inches in caliper requires that twothirds of the trees to be removed be mitigated in accordance with Section 18.790.060D; c. Retention offrom 50%to 75%of existing trees over 12 inches in caliper requires that 50 percent of the trees to be removed be mitigated in accordance with Section 18.790.060D; d. Retention of 75%or greater of existing trees over 12 inches in caliper requires no mitigation. 3. Identification of all trees which are proposed to be removed; • 4. A protection program defining standards and methods that will be used by the applicant to protect trees during and after construction. C. Subsequent tree removal. Trees removed within the period of one year prior to a development application listed above will be inventoried as part of the tree plan above and will be replaced according to Section 18.790.060D. Response: This application submittal includes a tree inventory from Matt Stine, Tigard City Forester. The report identifies three Kwanzan cherry trees that will be removed as a result of the skate park construction, two in the landscape island west of the skatepark and one in a landscape island that is on the skatepark site. These trees are each 10 to 11 inches in diameter(dbh). They will be removed to accommodate the main skatepark structure and to improve the parking and circulation pattern of the abutting parking area. All three cherry trees proposed for removal are smaller than 12 inches dbh, which is the threshold for being"designated as significant."Therefore, no mitigation is necessary (18.790.060.E). Nevertheless, as part of the parking area landscaping standards, the applicant is providing 9new trees on the site at the locations shown on the proposed conditions plan. Nine new trees are proposed to be planted in landscape planter islands around the skatepark site, largely within existing parking areas. The location of these trees is shown on the site plan. These trees are planted to comply with the parking area landscape requirements. There will be a net increase in trees planted on the site as a result of the skatepark project. 26 Clear Vision Area (18.795) Tigard municipal code exempts properties with CBD zoning from the requirement to maintain a clear visual clearance ares at intersections. (18.795.030.A)Nevertheless, the skatepark will not obstruct a 35 foot vision triangle at the intersection of SW Hall Boulevard and the access driveway to the civic center parking lot. Street and Utility Improvement Standards (18.810) The standards of 18.810 are generally similar to those of the Impact Study that is required for site design review. These were discussed above. The relevant parts of this chapter are outlined below: Streets and Sidewalks (030 and 070) The anticipated transportation impacts of the Tigard Skatepark will be minor, as discussed in detail in the previous submittal. Given the anticipated minor increase in trips generated by the skatepark, requiring the applicant remove existing sidewalks and make street improvements is not justified and would not be proportionate to the proposed development. The civic center's frontage on SW Hall is currently improved to three lanes with full curb and sidewalks. Nevertheless, the City of Tigard is willing to dedicate land along the frontage of SW Hall Boulevard to accommodate a future widening project. The extent of a future, widened right of way is shown on the site plan. 18.810.030 Streets A. Improvements. *** 5. If the City could and would otherwise require the applicant to provide street improvements, the City Engineer may accept a future improvements guarantee in lieu of street improvements if one or more of the following conditions exist: a. A partial improvement is not feasible due to the inability to achieve proper design standards; b. A partial improvement may create a potential safety hazard to motorists or pedestrians; c. Due to the nature of existing development on adjacent properties it is unlikely that street improvements would be extended in the foreseeable future and the improvement associated with the project under review does not, by itself provide a significant improvement to street safety or capacity; d. The improvement would be in conflict with an adopted capital improvement plan; e. The improvement is associated with an approved land partition on property zoned residential and the proposed land partition does not create any new streets; or f Additional planning work is required to define the appropriate design standards for the street and the application is for a project which would contribute only a minor portion of the anticipated future traffic on the street. 27 Response: As identified above, the city is willing to grant additional land for a future widening of the SW Hall Boulevard right of way. SW Hall is an ODOT facility. The site plan shows city dedication of right of way to ODOT that provides for a future five-lane arterial section-52 feet from centerline. These dimensions are specified by Tigard's Transportation System Plan. As discussed in the impact study earlier in this document, the best approximation of the number of vehicle trips that will be generated by the skatepark is 18 per day. SW Hall Boulevard at this location accommodates 14,100 AADT. The skatepark is will contribute an insignificant share to the overall number of trips on the adjacent transportation routes. For this reason, requiring street improvements for this project is not justified. Public Use Areas (080) The facility is itself a park, and will contribute to the city's inventory of parkland. Sanitary Sewer (090) The skatepark is an outdoor park facility, and therefore does not require any sanitary sewer facilities. Signage will direct users of the skatepark to the Police Department and City Hall restrooms. Drainage (100) Drainage that is in compliance with city engineering standards is shown on the previously submitted stormwater plan. Essentially, the runoff from the skatepark, which is no greater than that of the existing parking area, will be directed to the same connection in the public system under SW Hall Boulevard. Curt Pellatz, P.E., of Sisul Engineering has prepared a storm drainage plan that demonstrates feasibility for the proposed project. Also included with this plan are preliminary storm calculations for the runoff from the site, and detail about the capacity and functioning of the water quality vault that will be installed to the east of the skatepark, in the landscape area. Bikeways (110) SW Hall Boulevard in front of the site is a bikeway as designated on City maps. This facility may be improved further when ODOT widens the road. The City of Tigard is willing to dedicate land along the SW Hall frontage to accommodate a future bikeway. 28 Water and Other Utilities (120) The skate park does not require any water facilities. Park users will use the existing restrooms and drinking fountains that are available in the City Hall and Police Department buildings. At some future date, under a different permit, an outdoor drinking fountain may be installed closer to the main skatepark entrance. Tigard municipal code exempts properties with CBD zoning from the requirement to underground existing overhead utility wires. (18.810.120.C.3)No lighting, TV, or other utilities are proposed. Conclusion The new Tigard Skatepark is expected to be a wonderful amenity for all the citizens of Tigard. The site has been chosen and the facility has been designed to maximize the benefits to the city and reduce potential impacts as much as possible. All development standards are believed to be met, and land use approval is requested. 29 5to r vvl cder Report TIGARD SKATE PARK DESIGN ILAT1116CE AND RV APPROX f 30 LN0 J AWS F ADDn O N AL SETS AS ON l'yore 1•T BANK PARKING ION LAYOU T PL AN R EC � D O n 3 PAR K AN STRK BT ODU RSE • I RBTINAVERAG i VA IO N, ° / O ° NDTAL B: T � A U G °°��� i/ O • ° / \ CITY OF CO - - - p ° • CONCRETE DETAILS:0 PLANNING/E °`'LE 3%l 1G °� -CONCRETE MD (-4000 PS -2•TOTSLUMP O ���. ° O ° O p O O -3/3REBAR®1ON CENT ER R ACR OSS SKATE PARK, •FROM GRADE o p 4 / 0 0 0 O V Q e O I ED COMPACTED TO a THICK -RT040 YARDS POUR PER DAY -Ur SAW CUM I'DEITP EVERY IB TO O O _ ACT AS A GROOVE CUT O /.- p ( DE ,HANDRAIL O ° Q °Q ii;Wilk BADC�� O O° 333 3 I \7r • O O p (POP OUT BA N q d T Ell O p Op I• p, a ®o (_ - DETAIL DA: p 0 % � 2 SCR 4o PIPERAIL • O Oo // Q ■ � o Q . o o p j O I LEGEND: x Q DOUBLE SET wrm ` � O - PROJECT BOUNDARY d o O Z ° I - TOP or BANE OR BOWL■ - BOTTOM or TRANSITION • RAID BANK oa TIMYON z E ^ BANDRARS o z N DETAIL A? O I° LEDGES sums E°b , 0c0c. EXISTING SIDEWALK LANDSCAPING d c ° p r G O O• .. DRAINS E s CURVED L.ERIE5 ° ° p • DESIGN AND CONSTRUCTION BY: I oRERNaN P Q ° 1/ \ / 0 O I DREAMLAND SKATEPARKSLLC O __ARK H Y.101 I THESE AREAS ARE LEDGES TO TBANSTION ® ° 0 DOORS RWY.101 1 N�/ P6E 334 -'{ Y/ Q a IINCON?1 CITY.OREGON ///// 1 / // /1 I O O 97367 1 I/ I o ' nAZn �/ I I/ I 16 10 1 I I j/ ■ /I SCARE: 1• = 10' sou-I:to L /,H : I/�,I //�.�, SHEET N0. _ � 1-7-•• 3 OF 3 RECEIVED AUG 2 4 2006 CITY OF TIGARD PLANNING/ENGINEERING TIGARD SKATE PARK J.O. SGL 06-095 August 23, 2006 PRELIMINARY WATER QUALITY CALCULATIONS SISUL ENGINEERING A Division of Sisul Enterprises,Inc. 375 PORTLAND AVE. Gladstone, OR 97027 phone:(503)657-0188 fax:(503)657-5779 PRELIMINARY WATER QUALITY CALCULATIONS: This site drains to the existing storm drain system in S.W. Hall Boulevard to the east of the site. A Stormwater Management filter unit will be installed in-line on the proposed storm drain system upstream of the connection point to the existing storm system. These calculations will determine the number of cartridges required to treat the water quality flow. Two scenarios will be considered for these calculations: The first will size the filter unit to handle the combined flows from the impervious surface of both the existing parking area to the west of the skate park, and the skate park itself. The second will size the filter unit to handle the flows from the impervious surface of the skate park only. Impervious area: (See attached site plan for areas and storm drain layout) Existing parking area: Impervious surface= 17,240 sq.ft. Skate Park area: Impervious surface= 14,160 sq.ft. Total impervious area=31,404 sq.ft. Water quality flow for combined Ex. parking area and Skate Park area: The water quality flow was calculated by taking 0.36 inches of precipitation over 100% of the new impervious area. 0.36(in)xArea(sf) Water Quality Flow(cfs) _ 12(in/ft)(4hr)60(min/hr)60(sec/min) 0.36(in)x31,404(sf) =0.065 cfs Water Quality Flow(cfs) _ 12(in/ft)(4hr)60(min/hr)60(sec/min) Water Quality Flow (cfs) = 0.065 cfs. Water quality flow for Skate Park area only: The water quality flow was calculated by taking 0.36 inches of precipitation over 100% of the new impervious area. 0.36(in)xArea (sf) Water Quality Flow(cfs) _ 12(in/ft)(4hr)60(min/hr)60(sec/min) 0.36(in)x14,160(sf) =0.030 cfs Water Quality Flow (cfs) _ 12(in/ft)(4hr)60(min/hr)60(sec/min) Water Quality Flow (cfs) = 0.030 cfs. Stormfilter sizing: Per the Stormwater Management Product Design Manual, each Stormfilter cartridge is able to treat 0.034 cfs. Combined parking and skate park area: Water quality flow= 0.065 cfs Number of cartridges=0.065 cfs/0.034 cfs/cartridge= 1.91 (use 2 cartridges) A two cartridge unit will be needed to treat the combined area from the existing parking area and the new skate park area. Skate park area only: Water quality flow=0.030 cfs Number of cartridges =0.030 cfs/ 0.034 cfs/cartridge= 0.88 (use 1 cartridge) A single cartridge unit would be needed to treat the area from only the new skate park area. \ iii/(ANH _-.211.1.L1-‘‘.c.:::_ \ \ ) i I /7? / / / \ \ \ , \\\ 5 I i MIN RIM 151.54 k ...../ , / \ \11 \ / "..... if :\ \ / DERXA:OUND 153.0 ' —--- I L ) /..", 1 \ ) 1',3 -/-7- -1--- I-- 1 \ E 150.04 %1 \\ --- -IP .„_--.. .4 ----• -- i i !„._ --.... ..., \ li ____ .010, ---, ---., ..- ------ 114\ .. ' 4 iiiii• .T.:# 1 ch \ ) ..._- __ ---.--_7771 ,:t.-- .• ; • N'::1/,' 111111-' 1=—/ a i• - .''131,-I......'. 0 06.Inif, !IV'S't4i' •°. 1 -1 CO -Ali IF ' , .o ........-... .. - 60.:* . 0* ., -• .• • 0.fa. .0 • • I --7.-- -3 , - •• o .•.7. • ....111_,_ i • 6 1 ': ..sc:.:1! . 1 • m 1 M el • I H OF SKA ..r"" -.1"- ..... I -eti ,.........., .::::;:.;........4i:::::...:.....n •- 1 PARR . • I , v) / VI' IIIE e!' ALA ' .„r:::: :''':::::.::: v. • / / .,: e; (0-, • 1 ...: „.mmiw.is ..• 1 1 I 1 ..... , , „ „ :. tit , 1 _ .,..• ..... .....,„ , . Mill '.:::: pin ,•....i,.. , 1 1I,W.„. /i-...\---• 152.00 ( I:II I.I..I.I.I..I..'"II IIL 41111c-11&1 ...—.- ,.•.o C.•.°•.°.,V.I.. I..... — •• N T 1_ 4T4O.9 6 E X - .. •r. . „ (1 i 33 = .s..;./ • . -.7: 0 s ....- / •53 oPl , a.00 • • • _..) • c I-, '. -: II •!:. \ I 7 I • • 1 , EXISTINO CATCH BASIN / II 1:. x,'..:' IIIN I '''''' -LI ., R11.4 151106 ' ...-- '-. .1 11111111111111 -1 *A . \ I..1; U 0( IE OUT 144176 (S) ...• • ' -•• - 1 n .- / z I , #,..;',4+ ---".... #,,, .. —-----#,„..f... i:',....■ #,Vf.. *.t.1 #!...::, 1,.".. ......#.4,-- ett. if;14 %■41—j—iti■i'-=---_..%;MI—— "i:"..1 — .-' ,,,;.:Ai-- !?' ..... ,ki ...........,_, _ • -1 c , DRAIN \ / \ _.../ ( MIN Z1111_1,i9,50 STORMWATER--- • "... . EB r \ \ -.MANAGEKIENT ALTER 1 `.... .... / \ \ IE 1 .00 —— VAULT I ---..,,......., ___...------....... \ \ I: RIM 151.50 •• 4., ,‘4.. ,........--__.-- - IE IN 147.60 '.. • I-;'•\ IF'....-E)SLcii.10i2t512 1 1 IE OUT 145.10 .• ‘„ ( • I.,:”" .4*-. *'"Yt----------.1..4. ---._ '9.'" .4 II,... I ,.- --, „--j - ";,. 7 r-ir. .....--''■..P. -.--'' si,? '',.. 4a.'"'—4lit_/..., -. ...... 1.:,!:t. 1§2 :4V - Si#:;,11 I I I \ ,.1 •.• ..- ... „ ''.... fy .1. I i.,- ,---.1 -,- ' -j--I- ' ---4 IL_ t .:--. ..„, ., 7 --,-----•- 11 ' 1 -i i 1 1 --‘ --I . - ,. i--- ---I 1-"'""\---, :...:„:24irt,1,..._ ,,,, _____,_•••_•_________,..._H_,_______4..._____ . __________„._____ .,,, ...... -,,, .•:•i• .., _. ; . • II . . . . • Pctucck PIovi Sets -5/8 ••1•C IR 5i" 1 _ ��,1STER� I ; 4 232 O.• i. \ r-• --- .\ SKATEPARK ELEVATIONS DAVID ANUERSON� SW BURNHAM STREET �J, OREGON ti� �i ,.ex I :'-,;i --—--- C- \•\ Cq `yJ DP W...NE caa,.ennmu u `. w.'' ,•�� } pF AR' <�ri Mill: LF ECEV a? ti'4 ' e a � / i \ r � a2 .4., a 1 1'i9118 _'§ 4. , ;34 0,• I S J1 of i i \\ • 3 et rsC NU1,�i'W irbY -, 214. It WO .. dp1{ r l I _" -1 1 1 1 I ``�`�`` \ `\ ,��_ (I) KA a WON K;�6t r f \ C' '� O \ .� H e ;' , l ��� Niche / Skatepark Lot — 31 Spaces �.=----;-- q y _ s.e.eas-o Iaa LP' /7-PVC(?) F ' /' ---rya i ieiii• Exist' .w.. `�,,� ! ,vr - S-o ordo l �O<eie" �iey t•'ie•�� •� "� R/W'�6! < !!Iii?.+nlli Ilih fit I_, I il!lil I II lilll 1111 II II i!!!!ull @1u alit r;_I� 11411111!al!fit IIII - = W U w 1 I 1 I HM 4101: I ` C ° Ta\ ` ° � t'k 1'a C'✓ii4 �; O ,... Ire. I. b ..se t... Jwm IiY/�y DEDICATIONS i1� �@ syf9�'t�t �l� Q $ �I CITY C \ ❑ , 0.D.0 T. Z He9.:FF.1315Q•Qae r.4.1...,,.......- "lz 1 altyl.i I HALL \ 5 -21..41: J .r � xA ! r.o4 t H•�.� .,�„ a.: `, t;�e� \ WEST FACING ELEVATION 5 .,.• AT, ,,,as rwex H•awGeA..,,I.A.r. ANNEX I C`I �.+°_i'a� < aa'*on .tae s crr aF tstAcD (NICHE) � ��rE C \ \ Scale: t = 20' 1� ""f. Q Drainage Calculations K G \ ^ # I 11 I Il 1111111 T 11 � r.• 1 , I l i �•�� l 1, I __ JAN O '' 2007 I City Hall North Lot — 63 Spaces I I I _ +►�- �" !'%• '". % ( ` C PROPOSED .a 1 �- "+��- `=�� - _ ,- -1 1 ° I 11-- 1 ___._�,* + �� SKATEPARK —'IIII1111111111 !ullllll,llllllllll >r liillllllll+111111 I. p% 1�1 I�jr(°',5. I C me -- .nI I FENCE aj N r.if .. i e l`36Y, r r - Y' > i_ Fi W skotepoN bore desi L f1 . C -- a t qn u not competed. W 1 ° l ` �- C MN.Finish Floor t 149.3' N•1� C ��y: �3.�Ja SOUTH FACING ELEVATION j Police North Lot — 82 Spaces ; r— c _ I g I Scale: 1• = 20' /y iiii � 1 s I I___�__ ___� I acyS t a Proposed SI:rmeot r RAJ' - f ++'' r 1 f c/v 1 c/v f c/v Eelstine Catch Basis —, , Management FXtar Vault RIM EL 151.06 ! -�° - {� ` 7b aam� I Proposed Catch Bash E Valley Gutter Slope—o I.E.IN 144.96 f _ _ - - IE EL 112 Proposed Drain Line IL EL 151.5 I.E.OUT 144.76 i {rT!IIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIII 1114 I I ill IIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIII IIIIIIIIIII I I,1,111!i 111111111.01111i1111111�IIIIIIIII W IE OUT 148.21 I.E.N 1{7.fi TC 149 LE OUT 145.1 ..iII{(.,••�s.. it I I FENCE II I 4 1F firi f`i F9�rklig=Qt1.4;)!(I/$:�V:= l0-�`rt+t'k;q OA', SKATEPARK WALL il--� "'. 1�1.a ,e�yr 1 0 1 ___ ____�I . . T TC 0:4 4•MAX WALL HEIGHT i , a I< < < _L__�__l_�_=1 _ (al � �__�__�__�: ___L�_.1__�__1_��'•'`•'�''.K�'s' a[1v.•.�e1 ,, � I EAST FACING ELEVATION __ _ I xsTwc SIDEWALK I ���, I ,..s--I I Scale: 1`.. 20' � �` s`• ev_ iti iv. * yT� •:t '.a tix * ;t tit �x # 3 �i����lg ! I (f) 0 J t F U I ® X10•t.,;3.,30 I Q i Trange K T � 1:-* -- -- -- -- -- - ` +t t� I �I')�9' l I•<x4'f,Ti r — O .. ,. __ _ _ : l * w ; , iallllll a III . I IliiHlllll 1 t Illy ilhrl p!111 �. � ' 111.1 tllllni 11111 Il.itldlllll nllllll'll i. •t tit �i tit qtr i ic:.. as 6utlar IIYi�<eflf TAINT, t.,,• !— (� gtirm 11 l 11 111 i 1 11 -1- G�c, POLICE 4 „ ` �• ® 1 -�} Ni-- NORTH FACING ELEVATION O N O �`.` ■ i Scale: 1• - 20' — Q f �Q `, City Hall South Lot — 33 Spaces , i U �`� � 12'S f I LEGEND SITE AREA / . '1\te \ \ \ \\�1 ii i I SYMBOL DAcres Square Feet R i ATEPARK J_ __ L_J._�._1_J�_ Total Site Area SITE AN o rj E PL ." �,...__ _.,,''' --__ - _- T e I I,! ° to Remain T t I A 9.84 428,630 1007 SC JO ti.' # e e I e See Existing Conditions Plan for Landscape Area 2.86 124.582 29% ELEVATIONS 'tiY i Size and Species ,Oa Impervious area 6.98 •304,049 71% 1 r---- 1_ ! Existing Tree to be Removed \ revisions: l ! i l , I Proposed Parking Lot Tree 4 CITY HALL j yt y •,.� % CITY HALL * Existing Light Pole - \ date: 01/02/07 I i V \ Jt I �Peyr \‘�,. ;. scale:Varies 6•:•• Proposed Parking Lot Landscaping 11 I �9.,.. P 9 P 9 �, era.nl DA '��,_._.�—�"� 1; I C/\/ Carpool / Vanpool Parking Spaces , 1 11 H/C Handicap Parking Spaces .11.00411 t III •r II C Compact Parking Spaces i,ExIslln9 Catch Besii1 VICINITY MAP j 1 1 I I! . I : 1 S 'KATiPAR < SITE PLAN SCALE: 1' = p�„ } --- Sti<• 13URNHAM STREET -----------1 4��lSTiq�o• i I ti`-- t-' iI �q.y�6� gagyy�x�,� ;DAVID ANDERSONV V gro. `s 14* o. 'm m> \ O OREGON �C1 9SI ; ; .,, \,\ ,,,,„,,o c.= Age - \ `` i \ s I Q'4�r ty, �, wh` 1 4 ■ TAx LOT 200 ( \ a In I { - - \' WO,. \\ e �,.z' W a TAx LOT 300 ' — \ zY 0 s.N \ 4 tt. N L I \ 1r'/�1 1C1 �u ii", . , I HALL ANNE \ h4t :..w�e,�r�� cy?<t'° \ �d/'. w g \ y' -'• 1 �CDfFP-«.c'-:;APP v .IE 7Th1 50.50�\ CEOy / 11 50.45 e O EF e ..._ I € r �r_ . p VICINITY MAP V!1F ----c---- - ) Q� ` 2-N � =I/' ,,3- _, 1. - x" I-" IE OUT 46.37 ' -`.; _ :. --� ----- \T;\ � IE IN Ne'TH ,46.,2' LEGEND - __-.___ / IE IN C- NORTH 148.t7 ,r.. n` -{.._' t. QI I„�- - �. .) �- IE IN NE 148.27 / p P I 11'"-_'\ SYMBOL DESCRIPTION • . .- co Y [-�_ I52--s ` I —1 I * Light Pole CO I '} } • ! _ 1 J I -.--- --c---- Electric Line cc ,1/1', -4 6 ,- %. i ( ILA I i �� v �— 4� ���35g4�s �fk s J \ z I I ti, r �.1 I N I Tree —_`�� ! _� . •- i ¢ S :f I a >oy,—5urver Numeer ■ I .0 / U Q / I +153)6 Elevation I i Jt I` I T� w o IE .UT 144.76 Ir ' I o O N n.a-:.Iaeu.-soec�es and cab=SI.(Horde- 10"debt.) *y_ � hE�A�-. _/to 1 (.......77 IE N (N) 145.1 _ _ t w a v ( X Z �-. a IN(1) 146.vQJpt1 o I- . -1__. _ f'-^k+i_ _ _I K y �. - I I �152--�— Contour - 1' Intervals /�y/ `��, ,��. a ' TAX LOT 400 � ' -�"•� l t"'�... �'\ 1 G.J� x L0� 401 <0_ iu !/ �- ///� � I 1 I/�� 0 Catch Basin Imil SIOEWnI K - ., • i II I II rt l —_```- --�•— Storm Drain in L_. __ --L L -L -� J- 1 _A..' _\ -`-e. • . t t a .. y, -- t . _ - - ._ I I I I .a. ..se 5 o D a Line W It., " ,, , i0Pr-°s 114,' :a;k t 4a %.4;}.1V'4.:, "f„.:': t 3160. _;{r Co....� !-1°'\-I {/'• H 1 -Ir1Sbehan 1\. ��+ �\ /1�1 ∎\ 15., 1 �. -. Gas Line■0 C\5beiuld s�hewolp� I I1 11 i i:::::,...::::::,_.:1,......' r' 'Fl LE0 TH DIR� 4 cv -t 11 . j --i---- 70;1,',:-._-_,„4_1, .i_t..., ...., II M--r,— Water Line 11111 �� - - - - . _ _. -.- _ -.1,,___f_': + '' '�— _ --..- _- N Line Q Z C3 U POLICE ` � / I _ 0 w / \ i 1 • t R/w Right-of-Way I"'Li f�l e \, k�51�N� NN 4, I ONDITIONS r---- Th .. A .„,.., \,,,,,_„ „4_/I.: 11, PH' CITY HALL I I ,� revisions: CITY HALL Tax LOT 4os '° ": I,�I 11 1 - If-I 1 i Hi (1 \ dote: tz/oe/oe i I - I .cols: 1• a 30•• I i \`I \ IT. dr.aa:DA - _- IC IN 137.13 ( ( i- II job no: I I ` __�_ IE OUT 48" 136.73 1 ' I' - I ! li ' I 1 i, J ' 1 L EXISTI \ G CO\ ITIO\ S SCALE: 1" = 30' /N 2 Dt2_026e06- 6o6 L t v« CePvtlir 1c( v ."4r1q N dolt laf- 2W skkr. I►ICk,e 8 N`c(44 R C I I ED `n. suds U G 2 4 1006 CITY OF iG RD po(ke Nook 1„ 64- e4' Nerf k W.- PLANNING OF GIN ERING r / 30 (e(c 2$ Cc lNm11 59- r o l«e —et(-- 2-5 Per C fr, -9:-. 1 -Flet - Cott) Q1 crces 3 Ny e S ���� 7 T.1<e5 r h r P ,� C<< kacf 161rbroc ciq____142t_d_s•cek4 104- live 6 sK lus 7 Pew;f �f, ' �edu(arr +' - 39 SrtYs 5-- . G ) /A/V i . Clean Aio±ef services FROM WI ■TERBROOK ((, 5 _ T i (THU) 8 17 2006 r% 12 : 11/NO. 5012349248 P 2 AUG 1 7 2006 J -'4* By CWS File Number O6_OZ 0S?7 C1ealnWater Services onr Sensitive Area Pre-Screening Site Assessment Jurisdiction _ (14-t/ n7' T pgrd Date .0 + 1S tl0 Tax Map &Tax Lot /02,0A Oo /fv Owner 1 Applicant ;.f� ;M r� , t44.4rNvc) Site Address � 004 0( ��d, goy fi fp Company a in it 'coo r -t• (3i1S SYs_I;t:tlL'B"mgt.) Address • to SW 441.1,, AVe Proposed Activity Cehst-s—t.,474- i�-,goo a q4a►� City State Zip rev f( OR ki 212 i"1F sb rie 1)44* exi lhone rC3 617^QNj2 Cify 144 Q+Wki�1t7 (:f, ax 81.7 -`.550 By submitting this form the Owner, owner's authorized agent or representative,acknowledges and agrees that employees of Clean Water Services have authority to enter the project site at all reasonable times for the purpose of inspecting project site conditions and gathering information related to the project site. Official use only below this line Off clst us*only below this ling Of lclel use only below this line Y N NA Y N NA Sensitive Area Composite Map Stormwater Infrastructure maps 1i- ❑ ❑ Map# �s/w, ( i OS# Locally adopted studies or maps Other ❑ f�I Specify -- — 5] 77 Specify_d_Sy1`_il ypk 7i i Based on a review of the above Information and the requirements of Clean Water Services Design and Construction Standards Resolution and Order No. 04-9: ❑ Sensitive areas potentially exist on site or within 200'of the site. THE APPLICANT MUST PERFORM A SITE CERTIFICATION PRIOR TO ISSUANCE OF A SERVICE PROVIDER. If Sensitive Areas exist on the site or within 200 feet on adjacent properties, a Natural Resources Assessment Report may also be required. FRI Sensitive areas do not appear to exist on site or within 200' of the site. This pre-screening site assessment does NOT eliminate the need to evaluate and protect water quality sensitive areas If they are subsequently discovered. This document will serve as your Service Provider letter as required by Resolution and Order 04-9, Section 3.02.1. All required permits and approvals must be obtained and completed under applicable local, state,and federal law. ❑ The proposed activity does not meet the definition of development. NO SITE ASSESSMENT OR SERVICE PROVIDER LETTER IS REQUIRED. Reviewer Comments: I.?.rt.sed vy review a 7e 7-411. J:Ie. ip/wa Q•• a.w-,at' "'taros . ,.. Y •/ r: t*- % Y e 'Jr •.a C.•. ' • • Reviewed By Date: s/.2.(//0 a Official use only Post-it®Fax Note 7671 Date o ��s.y/as p#ag f es � Returned to Applicant To From e k /i.� //iv. Mail Fax % Counter Co/Dept.[, I 1 �/ Co. /)L ,f5 J✓ c3( Date ft/.2 y/06 By _ Phone# (/l/ (�C p+t /Phone# 0-00 -6131,cec Fax# ��� ��� yfx, Fax# 5 In -I- Pi'stoiic� CerF i403io ✓1 R lel RECEIVED OC1 0 , 2006 LANCASTER c1TY OF-TI ARD „ER' engineering PLANNING'tP�G�N ,NG October 2,2006 Ben Schonberger Winterbrook Planning 310 SW 4th Avenue, Suite 1100 Portland,OR 97013 RE: Tigard Skate Park Intersection Sight Distance Measurement Access to the planned Tigard Skate Park will be available via two existing driveways. The first is the main entrance to City Hall located on Hall Boulevard and the second is a drive- way to Burnham Street west of Hall Boulevard. This letter addresses sight distance at both driveways. Sight Distance Requirements Sight distance requirements are based on the speed of vehicles on the major street. In this case,the posted speed on Burnham Street is 30 mph and the posted speed at the access to Hall Boulevard is also 30 mph. However, there is a transition to a 40 mph speed zone immedi- ately south of the driveway location. As such,vehicles approaching the driveway from the south are traveling in a 40 mph speed zone and drivers approaching from the north are traveling in a 30 mph speed zone. The 2004 edition of A Policy on Geometric Design of Highways and Streets, published by AASHTO,contains requirements for intersection sight distance. According to the AASHTO manual,the location of a driver's eye in a vehicle waiting to enter the major street is assumed to be 15 feet behind the edge of the nearside travel lane. Both the driver's eye and the height of an oncoming object are assumed to be 3.5 feet in height. For speeds of 30 mph and 40 mph, inter- section sight distances of 335 feet and 445 feet are required,respectively. Sight Distance Measurements Sight distance measurements were made at the two driveways. The Burnham Street ac- cess is located on the outside of a horizontal curve, and as such, line of sight is favorable. Look- ing to the west from the driveway, line of sight is unrestricted and the required 335 feet of sight distance is clearly available. Looking to the east,the signalized intersection of Burnham Street and Hall Boulevard is clearly visible. Burnham Street terminates at its"T"shaped intersection 321 SW 4th Avenue,Suite 400•Portland,OR 97204•Phone 503.248.0313•Fax 503.248.9251 Ben Schonberger October 2, 2006 Page 2 of 3 with Hall Boulevard, so any traffic entering Burnham Street from Hall Boulevard will be mak- ing a 90-degree turn. Travel speeds of vehicles making this movement are relatively slow and there is sufficient visibility from the driveway location of approaching westbound traffic. Looking south from the main City Hall access,Hall Boulevard is tangent and level,and line of sight is unrestricted. The required 445 feet of sight distance is clearly available. Look- ing to the north, line of sight is restricted by vegetation and street trees on the inside of the hori- zontal curve of Hall Boulevard. Intersection sight distance was measured to be approximately 280 feet. Requirements for intersection sight distance are not satisfied. When intersection sight distance is not available, stopping sight distance is commonly examined. Intersection sight distance is an operational measure that is used to ensure that a stopped vehicle can enter the through traffic stream without significantly impeding the flow of through traffic on the major street. Stopping sight distance is considered the minimum measure foe safe operation,since it is the minimum distance necessary for an oncoming driver to see an object in the travel lane and come to a complete stop if necessary to avoid a collision. For southbound traffic on Hall Boulevard approaching the main City Hall driveway,the stopping sight distance requirement is 200 feet based on the posted speed of 30 mph. Due to the horizon- tal curve and the proximity of the traffic signal,actual travel speeds may be reduced somewhat, which would reduce the sight distance needed at the driveway. Conclusions and Recommendations The access to Burnham Street meets the applicable AASHTO standards for intersection sight distance. The access to Hall Boulevard meets these standards looking to the south,but not looking to the north. However, adequate stopping sight distance is available for southbound traffic on Hall Boulevard. As such,the main City Hall access can operate safely. In addition, southbound travel speeds approaching the driveway may be reduced by the horizontal curve on Hall Boulevard and the proximity to the traffic signal. The lack of available intersection sight distance may cause discomfort for some drivers exiting the driveway,although safe operation can be maintained since adequate southbound stopping sight distance is available. Given the limited sight distance to the north from the main City Hall driveway, one op- tion for traffic circulation would be to encourage the use of the Burnham Street access for skate park traffic. By providing this second access to serve traffic from the skate park,additional traf- fic on the main City Hall access can be minimized. Ben Schonberger October 2,2006 Page 3 of 3 If you have any questions or would like any further information,please don't hesitate to call. Yours truly, Todd E. Mobl y,PE,PTOE Senior Transportation Engineer ?c0 FROFF-. / J rAi( OREGON k. Op,O E. wov- (z'06 EXPIRES: I213,74 C roo (iA0GIvra/v WINTER bROO K Notice of Neighborhood Meeting August 23, 2006 Re: Tigard Skatepark Dear Interested Party, The City of Tigard Parks Department is proposing a new,public skatepark at 13125 SW Hall Boulevard, within the parking lot of City Hall. The location of the proposed park and preliminary designs for the facility are shown in the attached materials. The skatepark requires site development review by the City of Tigard. As part of the process, we are holding a neighborhood meeting to discuss the proposal in more detail and to solicit the input of surrounding owners and residents. You are invited to attend a meeting on: September 7, 2006 6:30 pm Tigard City Hall 13125 SW Hall Boulevard Representatives of the Parks Department will be on hand to answer questions and discuss the project. Please note that this will be an informational meeting on preliminary plans. These plans may be altered prior to the final approval of the application by the city. I look forward to discussing the proposal with you. Please call Dan Plaza, Tigard Parks, at 503- 718-2590 or me at 503-827-4422 if you have questions prior to the meeting. Thank you. Sincerely, i Ben Schonberger, AIC• Senior Planner Winterbrook Planning 310 SW Fourth Ave. Suite 1100 Portland,Oregon 97204 503.827.4422 voice 503.827.4350 fax www.winterbrookplanning.com COMMUNITY • RESOURCE • PLANNING 2:3102DB-04602 2S102DB-04900 BEDOLLA KAREN R HEDLUND TED B& 8915 SW O'MARA ST ZIMMER JOANNE M TIGARD,OR 97223 13331 SW CHELSEA LP TIGARD,OR 97224 2S102DD-01500 2S102DD-01400 BLICK CARL J DONA JEAN HOLSTEIN MARVIN R/LORETTA R TRS 8740 SW O'MARA 8710 SW OMARA TIGARD,OR 97223 TIGARD, OR 97223 2S102DB-00200 2S102DB-03500 BURNHAM BUSINESS&STORAGE LLC ISOM DAVID BRYAN AND 9500 SW BARBUR BLVD STE 300 BARBARA JO PORTLAND,OR 97219 13391 SW CHELSEA LOOP TIGARD, OR 97223 2 02AD-02200 2S101CB-00400 BURN • V I. I.ES : = ".-• E LLC JEMPAK PARTNERS LLC 9500 SA ' ' =IRBLy` TE 300 7034 SW 83RD AVE -TLAND,OR 97219 PORTLAND,OR 97223 2S 102 D B-02800 2S 102 D B-03400 BYRNE JAMES G&DIANNE V KACIR KENT C& 13454 SW CHELSEA LOOP KACIR KATHRYN M TIGARD, OR 97223 15027 ALSTONE DR FRISCO,TX 75035 S 102DD-00100 2S102DD-01300 CI TIGA KRAEMER JULIA A&MARK W 13125 LVD PO BOX 80665 ARD, OR 9722 PORTLAND,OR 97280 102DA-00600 2S102DA-00900 CIT IG LOUCKS PATRICIA& 13125 LVD BURTON LUCY ARD, OR 97223 13337 SW HALL BLVD PORTLAND,OR 97223 2S1020B-03200 2S102DA-00100 COGBURN ROBINANN K& MAGNO LLC FRARY MAUREEN L 8800 SW COMMERICAL ST 13348 SW CHELSEA LOOP TIGARD, OR 97223 TIGARD, OR 97223 2S102D8-05000 2S102DA-00300 DACUS WILLIAM J& DEBRA S MATSUMOTO WILLIAM Y&NINA A 13322 SW CHELSEA LP 8770 SW BURNHAM RD TIGARD, OR 97223 TIGARD,OR 97223 2S102D9-03000 2S102DD-01501 HARBISON PATRICK N&ERICA L MCANDREW JOHN W&ANGELA D 13404 SW CHELSEA LP 8830 SW OMARA ST TIGARD, OR 97223 TIGARD,OR 97223 2S102DB-03100 2S102DA-00704 MERRICK DONALD L&CAROL J TI CITY OF 13376 SW CHELSEA LP 13125 S BLVD TIGARD, OR 97223 TI D, OR 9722 23102DB-00603 2S102DA-00400 OTTING LOIS E TI CITY OF 8885 SW O'MARA ST 13125 SW VD TIGARD,OR 97223 T , OR 97223 • 2S102DB-03300 2 02DA-00402 REDFIELD SPENCER D JR& TIGAR 0 MARY L 13125 S LL D 13336 SW CHELSEA LP TI D, OR 97223 TIGARD,OR 97223 2S 102 DA-00800 102 DA-00200 SCHALTZ RANDY A& MARGARET C TIG•-I •IF 13335 SW HALL BLVD 13 W ' BLVD TIGARD, OR 97224 IGARD,OR 9722 2S 102 D D-01301 2 S 102AD-03451 STATE OF OREGON TIGARD WATER DISTRICT DEPARTMENT OF TRASPORTATION 8777 SW BURNHAM ST RIGHT OF WAY SECTION PO BOX 23000 417 TRANSPORTATION BLDG TIGARD, OR 97223 SALEM, OR 97310 2S 102 D B-00601 2 102A D-03450 STEINBICHLER GEORGE& TIG•-= ATER DIST- SHARILYN 8777 SW_BU -1 ST 8855 SW OMARA ST PO B• 000 TIGARD,OR 97223 ARD,OR 97223 2S102DA-00701 2S102DA-00500 TIGARD CHRISTIAN CHURCH TIGARD-TUALATIN SCHOOL 13405 SW HALL BLVD DISTRICT#23J TIGARD, OR 97223 6960 SW SANDBURG ST TIGARD,OR 97223 P�fC 01 2S102DB-02700 TIGARD CIT TIMM CARREN A 13125 L B 13488 SW CHELSEA LP RD, OR 97223 TIGARD, OR 97223 2 020B-00500 2S102DB-00604 TIGA' - a TOMBLESON DANICE LLOYDE 13125 -•LL BLVD 8825 SW O'MARA ST T -• "D,OR 97223 TIGARD, OR 97223 2S102DA-00703 2S10208-00100 TI CITY VERIZON NORTHWEST INC 13125 LVD PO BOX 152206 T D, OR 97223 IRVING, TX 75015 25:,02DB-02900 ZHANG CHINGSHENG 13416 SW CHELSEA LOOP TIGARD,OR 97223 Nathan and Ann Murdock Mildren Desiy,. group PO Box 231265 Attn: Gene Mildren Tigard, OR 97281 7650 SW Beveland Street, Suite 120 Tigard, OR 97223 Sue Rorman Diane Baldwin 11250 SW 82nd Avenue 3706 Kinsale Lane SE Tigard, OR 97223 Olympia, WA 98501 Naomi Gallucci 11285 SW 78th Avenue Tigard, OR 97223 Michael Trigoboff 7072 SW Barbara Lane Tigard, OR 97223 Brad Spring 7555 SW Spruce Street Tigard, OR 97223 Alexander Craghead 12205 SW Hall Boulevard Tigard, OR 97223-6210 Gretchen Buehner 13249 SW 136th Place Tigard, OR 97224 John Frewing 7110 SW Lola Lane Tigard, OR 97223 CPO 4B 16200 SW Pacific Highway, Suite H242 Tigard, OR 97224 CPO 4M Pat Whiting 8122 SW Spruce Tigard, OR 97223 CITY OF TIGARD - EAST INTERESTED PARTIES (i:\curpin\setup\labels\CIT East.doc) UPDATED: 21-Oct-05 Josh Thomas 10395 SW Bonanza Tigard, OR 97224 Gretchen Buehner 13249 SW 136th Place Tigard, OR 97224 Paul Owen 10335 SW Highland Drive Tigard, OR 97224 Tim Esau PO Box 230695 Tigard, OR 97281 CPO 4B 16200 SW Pacific Highway, Suite H242 Tigard, OR 97224 Ross Sundberg 16382 SW 104th Avenue Tigard, OR 97224 Brian Wegener 9830 SW Kimberly Drive Tigard, OR 97224 Joseph Dyar 10285 SW Highland Drive Tigard, OR 97224-4668 Rex Caffall 13205 SW Village Glenn Tigard, OR 97223 John Frewing 7110 SW Lola Lane Tigard, OR 97223 AFFIDAVIT OF POSTING NOTICE FOR A PUBLIC HEARING IMPORTANT NOTICE: THE APPLICANT IS REQUIRED TO COMPLETE THIS AFFIDAVIT AND RETURN IT TO THE CITY AT THE ADDRESS BELOW, ACCOMPANIED BY A COPY OF THE NOTICE THAT WAS POSTED ON THE SITE. City of Tigard Planning Division 13125 SW Hall Boulevard Tigard, OR 97223-8189 In the Matter of the Proposed Land Use Applications for: Land Use File Nos.: SDA 020o ( - DO Oo S Land Use File Name: Tt C-ifk1ZS \C A 7E1 PA 12 V., I, HA(ZcO CA'C t. 11--L-AS, do affirm that I am (represent) the party initiating interest in a land use proposal affecting the land located at (state the approximate location(s) IF no address(s) and/or tax lot(s) currently registered) I312S SW k}N\l TE\vd. � l iy.,Yc1) D R 97 2.23 , and did personally post notice of the Public Hearing on the proposed land use application(s) by means of weatherproof posting in the general vicinity of the affected territory, a copy of said notice being hereto attached and by reference made a part hereof, on the.24/'k day of Au5 -fs+ , 200'. ,(41. d/C`--- Signature of Person Who Performed Posting 9 (In the presence of the Notary) (THIS SECTION FOR A STATE OF OREGON, NOTARY PUBLIC TO COMPLETE/NOTARIZE) STATE OF °Rty''"/ ) County of v"0"31 ) ss. Subscribed and sworn/affirmed before me on the 7 - day of e P I-4,-, 114-v- , 20 0:1-1.- OFFICIAL SEAL -°''i KRISTIE J PEERMAN `�r N07ARY PUBLIC OREGON n "� COMMISSION NO.370962 NOTARY PUBLIC` OF OREGON MY COMMISSION EXPIRES JULY 28,2007 My Commission Expires: h\login\patty\masters\affidavit of posting for a public hearing doc F AFFIDAVIT OF MAILIP,J/POSTING NEIGHBORHOG0 MEETING NOTICE .IMPORTANT NOTICE: THE APPLICANT IS REQUIRED TO MAIL THE CITY OF TIGARD`A COPY OF THE NEIGHBORHOOD MEETING NOTICE THAT PERTAINS TO THIS AFFIDAVIT AT THE SAME TIME PROPERTY :OWNERS ARE MAILED NOTICE, TO THE ADDRESS BELOW: City of Tigard Planning Division � �� � w i li p ti , �d" � �� �i���,pi�r,�; {3 125 SW Hall Boulevard � �'` � � Tigard, OR 97223-8189 z�. IN ADDITION, THE APPLICANT SHALL SUBMIT THIS AFFIDAVIT & COPIES OF ALL NOTICES F AEllICKIJON., crgUiNEERING MAILING: • a. l`C Eliv Ag A , being duly sworn, depose and say that on the '7-3 day of All US , 20 $6 I caused to have mailed to each of the persons on the attached list, a notice of a meeting to discuss a proposed development at(or near) 13125 Sw 144t(? 8(Vd . , a copy of which notice so mailed is attached hereto and made a part of hereof. I further state that said notices were enclosed in envelopes plainly addres ed to said persons and were depo Itec on t�e date indicated above in the United States Post Office located XV)S� a Dal - c-k I r0�QC.td/,O►� with postage prepaid thereon. ignature the presence of a Notary Public) POSTING: I, , do affirm that I am (represent) the party initiating interest in a proposed affecting the land located at (state the approximate location(s) IF no address(s) and/or tax lot(s) currently registered) and did on the day of , 20 personally post notice indicating that the site may be proposed for a application, and the time, date and place of a neighborhood meeting to discuss the proposal. The sign was posted at (state location you posted notice on property) Signature (In the presence of a Notary Public) (THIS SECTION FOR A STATE OF OREGON, NOTARY PUBLIC TO COMPLETE/NOTARIZE) STATE OF O GOh ) County of \ c \ r\cymc-,_r) ss. Subscribed and sworn/affirmed before me on the day of ( A .,LcJ,yt , 200k, . #;^l4. OFFICIAL SEAL JANET C LOVELIN ea1^ ° NOTARY PUBLIC-OREGON t �'. COMMISSION NO.403230 n ,ct i j, MY COMMISSION EXPIRES MARCH 2,2010 N ARY PUBLIC OF OREGON My Commission Expires: 3 In Applicant, please complete the information below: NAME OF PROJECT OR PROPOSED DEVELOPMENT: `1"1 ated S k 4 pc v k TYPE OF PROPOSED DEVELOPMENT: Pav/ V Address or General Location of Subject Property: t'g t _- $W I 1 blvd . Subject Property Tax Map(s)and Lot#(s): i5 l 0 2)4- — L( h:Uoain\oatt\masters\affidavit of mailing-posting neighborhood meeting.doc Tigard Skatepark Neighborhood Meeting September 7, 2006 Sign In Sheet Name(please print) Address/City/ State Zip Phone E-mail • • • • • \\:\*.\ I 15-5/5 TPC SW BURNNMI STREET ia-ae . • AN A TES Who/ at rwt tat-33 Spars LANDSCAPE . ��� �� ARCHITECTS :A.k _..... .4 City Hall Harm Lot-12 Spam _ , :- , C 1aiF'�rr11r1�- Al t iii a. Y c ta'< 9UTEPARK ■ s sN1 M1 rmi !rm1 r _.. t ;: ti ``. Q r iw �, Y fh,h 'I Urn I IX 1 N ^`: a' 2m ,.> rF',...7 qty `lot- SO*sen • E ' S7 PLAN ti y ...111aniei�101 w+.r • ttoaWv tots-18!poem I 1: I .. onmor orr•^A Wall SKIM I -i I I ... e..r• • i li I a.r SKATEPARK SITE PLAN L Ste: t'-,o. 1 • TIGARD SKATE PARK DESIGN TOTALPARKARBA_13]00SQ,�. sKATB EURFA(�Atm REl'ADDNC1wAu i • 0 DECAE�0.B 1vct ''vo r APPA0L SpIXS� Q A ffii 0 N AL UON AN IVB STM COURSE ° O Q° ° i Q O / NOT roSCALE. Do • - - ,O Q Q o o 6T ? BANK n 0 °� • • I ) 7T A_HONS RELATION TO O N CONCRETE DETARS: -CONCRETE MIX-4000 PSI � _ 0 -2•TO)•SLUMP -3/8'AEBA&.r o Cffi18 ACROSS o Q SCATS/ARM'PROM GRADS Q Q 0 -3N CRUSHED ROCK COMPACTED TO P TRUCE 1 Q I O TO O O -1MAW I' EVERY 161 O00 jJ' ` 0 ..1.. BANIIRAD. ACI'ASAOR00V8 CUT 111 %� I O A .1 Q , O O° • m T(POP OU p 0 O ° ® 1 DETAIL A: 0 2"SCH.b PRPBAIL o � / � 0 //I \� w ! ° O \ O° Q I Q 1 f /// LEGEND: x 0 O DOUBLE SET WTIH ` / _ I — PROJECT BOUNDARY C4 1 RAILS AND Lffi)0� J o - Tor or BANK OR BOAT. a. ° 0 ` /r� - BOTTOM OP TRANS TSOR zN 0 /�� RAMP RAN[OR TRANBITION Col v O I O F j DSCAR.A ° O I � ReABIB � ��m ® L1)f0s8CAPDHi C] �7y ° ° RffilDf6 SALE CI G 1 I O O O. ■• DRAWN _F • I o I CURVED LEDGES O ° D83KRi AND CONSTRUCTION BY: JJ OR BENCH ! / .\ / ° 0 I DREAMLAND SKATE/MUGS LLC 1 ® � / 0 MARK A.SCOTT 4 I THESE ARRAS ARE LEDGES ro isA3131TDN 0 960 ss lI9IY.101 / I \� // �1 I I °'O O LWCOLN CRY.oREOOx 17//// 97367/—I I/�/ i I ° ° I .gm i OAP I//� �/ / 0 0 O CCM*112121 I IH PIPE ij 1- 1DATE: T/02/OS L • - /� DRAWN BY: YRR /18729 1 /// T 1T•1 SHEET no. 3 OF i -�� MEMORANDUM WINTER bKOOK To: Cheryl Caines, City of Tigard From: Ben Schonberger r-- C O M M U N I T Y Date: September 8,2006 RESOURCE Re: Tigard Skatepark Neighborhood Meeting PLANNING Tigard Parks held a neighborhood meeting to discuss the site plan for the proposed Tigard Skatepark project last night, September 7,at City Hall. Dan Plaza from Tigard Public Works, and Ben Schonberger and Katie Hinman from Winterbrook Planning hosted the meeting, which began at 6:30 pm. There were no attendees.We waited until 6:45,when we collected our presentation materials and left. Because there were no attendees,there are no minutes from the meeting,comments or concerns raised by participants. Attached are: • a copy of the letter that was mailed to property owners within 500 feet of the site, • a copy of the mailing list provided by the City of Tigard, • a copy of the handout that was available at the meeting. • The sign-in sheet that was available at the meeting. Affidavits for the mailing and posting were previously submitted and should already be in your possession. Winterbrook Planning 310 SW Fourth Avenue, Suite 1100 Portland, OR 97204 503.827.4422 • 503.827.4350 (fax) • ben @winterbrookplanning.com LAND USE PROPOSAL DESCRIPTION 120 DAYS = 5/18/2007 FILE NO.: SITE DEVELOPMENT REVIEW(SDR) 2006-00005 FILE TITLE: TIGARD SKATE PARK APPLICANT/ City of Tigard APPLICANT'S Winterbrook Planning OWNER Parks Department REP.: Attn: Ben Schonberger Attn: Dan Plaza 310 SW 4h Ave.,Suite 1100 13125 SW Hall Boulevard Portland, OR 97204 Tigard,OR 97223 REQUEST: The applicant is requesting approval to construct a 15,000 square-foot skate park on the City Hall site. The site consists of three parcels that total 9.84 acres. LOCATION: 13125 SW Hall Boulevard, Washington County Tax Map 2S102DA, Tax Lot 400 and 401; and 8720 SW Burnham Street;Washington County Tax Map 2S 102DA,Tax Lot 200. ZONE: CBD: Central Business District. The CBD zoning district is designed to provide a concentrated central business district, centered on the City's historic downtown, including a mix of civic, retail and office uses. Single-family attached housing, at a maximum density of 12 units/net acre, equivalent of the R-12 zoning district, and multi-family housing at a minimum density of 32 units/acre, equivalent to the R-40 zoning district, are permitted outright. A wide range of uses, including but not limited to adult entertainment, utilities, facilities with drive-up windows, medical centers, major event entertainment and gasoline stations, are permitted conditionally. APPLICABLE REVIEW CRITERIA: Community Development Code Chapters 18.360, 18.390, 18.520, 18.705, 18.725, 18.745, 18.755, 18.765, 18.780, 18.790, 18.795 and 18.810. DECISION MAKING BODY BELOW: ❑ TYPE I ® TYPE II ❑ TYPE III ❑ TYPE IV COMMENTS WERE SENT: JANUARY 30, 2007 COMMENTS ARE DUE: FEBRUARY 13, 2007 El HEARINGS OFFICER (MON.) DATE OF HEARING: TIME: 7:00 PM PLANNING COMMISSION (MON.) DATE OF HEARING: _TIME: 7:00 PM ❑ CITY COUNCIL (TUE S.) DA'1E OF HEARING: TIME: 7:30 PM El STAFF DECISION (TENTATIVE) DATE OF DECISION: MARCH 1, 2007 COMPONENTS RELATED TO THE PROJECT AVAILABLE FOR VIEWING IN THE PLANNING DIVISION ® VICINITY MAP ® DRAINAGE PLAN ® IMPACT STUDY ® SITE PLAN ® STORM WATER ANALYSIS ❑ WETLANDS DELINEATION ® NARRATIVE ® TREE PLAN ® OTHER MISCELLANEOUS STAFF CONTACT: Cheryl Caines,Assistant Planner (503) 639-4171,Ext. 2437 City of Tigard, Oregon • 13125 SW Hall Blvd. • Tigard, OR 97223 • • April 18,2006 TIGARD Ben Schonberger Winterbrook Planning 310 SW 4th Ave.,Suite 1100 Portland, OR 97204 RE: Completeness Review-Tigard Skate Park Site Development Review, Case File No. SDR2006-00005 Dear Mr. Schonberger: The City has received the application for Site Development Review (SDR2006-00005) to construct a 15,000 square foot skate park on the City Hall site. The site consists of three parcels totaling 9.84 acres. Staff has completed a preliminary review of the submittal materials and has determined that the following additional information is necessary before the application can be deemed complete: 1. Narrative. Please revise and re-submit the narrative code sections listed below. These must be incorporated into one revised narrative and not as a supplemental document. Responses should include facts, findings and conclusions. • Section 18.705.030 ♦ Section 18.745.030 and 040. (Show calculations for both bike and vehicle parking). ♦ Section 18.765.030.D, F,G,H;050 2. Tree Plan. A tree plan must be provided that meets the four components outlined in 18.790.030. The plan must be prepared by a certified arborist. 3. Site Plan. Please revise the site plan to show the following items: • Width of the access onto SW Burhnam Street. ♦ Aisle width adjacent to compact spaces in the City Hall North lot. • All handicap spaces and carpool/vanpool spaces. ♦ Square footages of site area, landscape area, and impervious area for the entire site. Phone: 503.639.4171 • Fax: 503.684.7297 • www.tigard-or.gov • TTY Relay: 503.684.2772 4. Ejecati ons P./ease 5 p fencing to be sta rode dtd ube�Fa c ' Items.installed around the Oka d eleVaa°n 6. These review engineer as shown se pro�de to park pins for the skate the note that c°n�o.not requite on the atta hed sheet re park Include • Adequate h°ns of approval smpa°nse, but sh d required by our level • Existing econ one for the y be added t insure ure taken into °p`i'enr be park entrance, path pare'areas and a these items ate re Qadon pleas fleet this re �dchaog fo Citl, p desn wa lved e r Should the pary m d gent. parkng will is not u'� iri 'ays Will 243 YOU have any Sues fnspotion eoc�ilynpo e pro��te°f e p lighting plan Sincerely, questions with teed the site. ant considering bi parrk u e to p to these items, cycles will�� Cheryl_d e a nls' please Assistant l Comes contact the at s planner 503-718- c: DD 0QG-40pp5 Plaza, Lan Use File ,:lcur�,tnlrhent � Parks&Fa Dan dry„ Facilities h? �l'-�Kp y0g l7'garr Skate Aark�sdr anage1'' City of r �N'�'-f�+7YN)�iqr� d mf'letevoe PUBLIC FACILITY PLAN Project: ..teboard Park COMPLETENESS CHECKLIST Date: 10/19/06 GRADING ❑ Existing and proposed contours shown. Proposed contours for skate park and impacted parking areas need to be shown ❑ Are there grading impacts on adjacent parcels? NA ❑ Adjacent parcel grades shown. NA ❑ Geotech study submitted? NA STREET ISSUES ❑ Right-of-way clearly shown. Show dimensions ® Centerline of street(s) clearly shown. ® Street name(s) shown. ❑ Existing/proposed curb or edge of pavement shown. Show dimensions and discuss how you will meet the standards (see 18.810.030.A.5.t) ❑ Street profiles shown. NA ❑ Future Street Plan: Must show street profiles, topo NA on adjacent parcel(s), etc. ® Traffic Impact and/or Access Report ❑ Street grades compliant? ❑ Street/ROW widths dimensioned and appropriate? Show dimensioned dedication on plans I I Private Streets? Less than 6 lots and width NA appropriate? ❑ Other: SANITARY SEWER ISSUES ❑ Existing/proposed lines shown. ❑ Stubs to adjacent parcels required/shown? WATER ISSUES ❑ Existing/proposed lines w/ sizes noted? ❑ Existing/proposed fire hydrants shown? ❑ Proposed meter location and size shown? ❑ Proposed fire protection system shown? STORM DRAINAGE AND WATER QUALITY ISSUES ® Existing/proposed lines shown? ® Preliminary sizing calcs for water quality/detention provided? ® Water quality/detention facility shown on plans? ❑ Area for facility match requirements from calcs? [J Facility shown outside any wetland buffer? ❑ Storm stubs to adjacent parcels required/shown? The subm ttal is hereby deemed COMPLETE Z INCOMPLETE By: Date: 10/19/06 REVISED: 10/19/06 WINTER MEMORANDUM BROOK RECEIVED PLANNING To: Cheryl Caines,City of Tigard J From: Ben Schonberger SEP 1 8 2006 COMMUNITY Date: September 14,2006 CITY OF TIGARD R E S O U R C E Re: Skatepark application new materials P L A N N I N G Cheryl, Per your August 25 e-mail,here are additional application materials for the skatepark application. This should allow you to do the completeness check. (The sight distance certification letter is in process.)Attached items are: • Clean Water Services letter • Additional narrative addressing sections 18.360, 18.520, 18.725,and 18.810. • Neighborhood meeting documentation • Engineering pre-app notes I've included three copies of everything,as requested. Winterbrook Planning 310 SW Fourth Avenue, Suite 1100 Portland, OR 97204 503.827.4422 ■ 503.827.4350 (fax) ben @winterbrookplanning.com LAND USE APPLIC1 ON Date: `T 3 oV 5Kc Park, COMPLETENESS REVIEW - COMPLETE ' INCOMPLETE STANDARD INFORMATION: Deed/Title/Proof Of Ownership [r Neighborhood Mtg.Affidavits, Minutes, List Of Attendees[' Impact Study(18.390) E2 USA Service Provider Letter ❑ Construction Cost Estimate ❑ 4 #Sets Of Application Materials/Plans [r Pre-Application Conference Notes ❑ Envelopes With Postage(Verify Count) PRO JECTSTATISTICS: ❑ Building Footprint Size ❑ %Of Landscaping On Site ❑ %Of Building Impervious Surface On Site ❑ Lot Square Foo ge -- PLANS DIMENSIONED: ❑ Building Footprint ❑ Pa r1. Dimensions(Include Accessible&Bike Parking)-❑- Truck Loading Space Where Applicable ❑ Building Height Access Approach And As e J ❑ Visual Clearance Triangle Shown ADDITIONAL PLANS: ❑ Vicinity Map ❑ Architectural Plans ❑ Tree Inventory • Existing Conditions Plan Landscape Plan 9 Site Plan _____ ❑ Lighting Plan -Coed :J-; •••~ TREE PLAN/MITIGATION P ❑❑ :' Repo/4' - 'IY e- Pry 4Cc.-i- r"` ❑❑ i1D 1n;4+ n,'-i..M K bk i vt cl ADDITIONAL REPORTS: (list any special reports) ❑ ❑ ❑ ❑ ❑ ❑ RESPONSE TO APPLICABLE CODE SECTIONS: ---, ❑ 18.330(Condroonal Use) ❑ 18.620(Tigard Triangle Design Standards) ❑ 18.765(Off-Street Parts ❑ 18.340 Directors ant retaUon ( nReveew) Requirements) ( erP ) (Washington Square Regional Center) 1 . 75(Sensitive Lands Review) ❑ 18.350(Planned Development) 18.705(A_ccessslE�ress/Circulation) [!]' 18.780(signs) ❑ 18.360(Site Development Review) Q 18. 710(Accessory Residential Units) ❑ 18.785(Temporary Use Permits) ❑ 18.370(Varances/Adjustrnents) ❑ 18.715(Density Computations) ❑ 18.790(Tree Removal) ❑ 18.380(Zoning Map/Text Amendments) ❑ 18.720(Design Compatibility Standards) a 18.795(Visual Clearance Areas) 1■i/,r1 ❑ 18.385(Miscellaneous Permits) ❑ 18.725(Environmental Performance Standards) ❑ 18.797(Water Resources(WR)Overlay District) ❑ 18.390(Decision Making Procedures1mpact Study) ❑ 18.730(Exceptions To Development Standards) ❑ 18298(Wireless Communication Facilities) ❑ 18.410(Lot Line Adjustments) ❑ 18.740(Historic Overlay) ❑ 18.810(Street&Utility Improvement Standa> ❑ 18.420(Land Partitions) _18.742(Home Occupation Permits) _ ❑ 18.430(Subdivisions) 18.745(Landscaping&Screening Standards) ❑ 18.510(Residential Zoning Distncts) 18.750(Manufachrred/Mobd Home Regulations) ❑ 18.520(Commercial Zoning Districts) ❑ 18.755(Mixed Solid Waste/Recycling Storage) ❑ 18.530(Industrial Zoning Drstncts) ❑ 18.760(Nonconforming Situations) ADDITIONAL ITEMS: I:\curpin\masters\revised\land use application completeness review.dot REVISED: 17-Jan-01 City of Tigard, Oregon - 13125 SW Hall Blvd. • Tigara, .jR 97223 1114 .1 • TIGARD December 21, 2006 Ben Schonberger Winterbrook Planning 310 SW 4th Ave., Suite 1100 Portland, OR 97204 RE: Completeness Review-Tigard Skate Park Site Development Review, Case File No. SDR2006-00005 Dear Mr. Schonberger: The City has received the application for Site Development Review (SDR2006-00005) to construct a 15,000 square foot skate park on the City Hall site. The site consists of three parcels totaling 9.84 acres. Staff has completed a preliminary review of the submittal materials and has determined that the following additional information is necessary before the application can be deemed complete: 1. Public Facility Items. Please provide the information required by our development review engineer, as shown on the attached sheet. Should you have any questions with regard to these items, please contact Kim McMillan at 503-718-2642. Sincerely, Cheryl Caines Assistant Planner c: SDR2006-00005 Land Use File Dan Plaza, Parks & Facilities Manager, City of Tigard curgln\chcn•I\sdr\sdr2INI6-INNN15\Tigard Skate Park\sdr21NIG-INNN15 incomplete 2.doc Phone: 503.639.4171 • Fax: 503.684.7297 • www.tigard-or.gov • TTY Relay: 503.684.2772 I . 251 02 D 4 4ac PUBLIC FACILITY PLAN Project: _ .dteboard Park COMPLETENESS CHECKLIST Date: 10/19/06 r Shaw 4+0 u.> prfvectoG, LOT- CAS W 1[.4, W6 -k . Wf4E'iCE tS SKATE P4A.k ,GRADING t ZA-1041C€ ? Existing and proposed contours shown. Proposed contours for skate park and impacted parking areas need to be shown ❑ Are there grading impacts on adjacent parcels? NA ❑ Adjacent parcel grades shown. NA _ ❑ Geotech study submitted? NA STREET ISSUES HRight-of-way clearly shown. Show dimensions Centerline of street(s) clearly shown. ►1 Street name(s) shown. V Existing/proposed curb or edge of pavement shown. Show dimensions and discuss how you will meet the standards (see 18.810.030.A.5.f) [l Street profiles shown. NA ❑ Future Street Plan: Must show street profiles, topo NA on adjacent parcel(s), etc. Z Traffic Impact and/or Access Report 0 Street grades compliant? Street/ROW widths dimensioned and appropriate? Show dimensioned dedication on plans Private Streets? Less than 6 lots and width NA appropriate? ❑ Other: SANITARY SEWER ISSUES ❑ Existing/proposed lines shown. ❑ _ Stubs to adjacent parcels required/shown? WATER ISSUES ❑ Existing/proposed lines w/ sizes noted? ❑ Existing/proposed fire hydrants shown? ❑ Proposed meter location and size shown? ❑ Proposed fire protection system shown? STORM DRAINAGE AND WATER QUALITY ISSUES ® Existing/proposed lines shown? ❑ Preliminary sizing calcs for water quality/detention provided? ® Water quality/detention facility shown on plans? ❑ Area for facility match requirements from calcs? ❑ Facility shown outside any wetland buffer? ❑ Storm stubs to adjacent parcels required/shown? The submit I is hereby deemed COMPLETE ® I COMPLETE By: Date: 10/19/06 REVISED: 10/19/06 12,0 W I i 0 Ai Tb 5 ZJ pizom ( i 5 RE&U tg� s )((Zrc )Ise -l4 is. RGW MtkST MEET 5 LAME t4 TG,tIA( I��IJ G WINTER MEMORANDUM RECEIVED PLANNING bROOK To: Cheryl Carnes,City of Tigard Planning G From: Ben Schonberger JAN 0 4 2006 � Date: January 3,2007 CITY OF TIGARD Re: Tigard Skatepark,SDR 2006-00005 Cheryl, Attached find a revised submittal for the Tigard Skatepark land use application.The revisions include an updated narrative and updated site plan. This version responds to your completeness letter dated December 21,2006. Kim McMillan, Dennis Kollermeier and Brian Rager met to discuss the outstanding items identified in that letter on December 22,2006. At the meeting,they made extensive notes on a copy of the site plan of what revisions would be required to satisfy the submittal requirements for public facilities. I have included this marked-up copy of the site plan to be included as background materials for the land use file.The latest set of revisions reflects the changes identified on the plan. Contact me if you have any questions. Ben Schonberger,AICP Winterbrook Planning Winterbrook Planning 310 SW Fourth Avenue, Suite 1100 Portland, OR 97204 503.827.4422 • 503.827.4350(fax) ben@winterbrookplanning.com City of Tigard, Oregon • 13125 SW Hall Blvd. • Tigard, OR 97223 • January 10,2007 T I G A R D Ben Schonberger Winterbrook Planning 310 SW 4`h Ave., Suite 1100 Portland, OR 97204 RE: Completeness Review-Tigard Skate Park Site Development Review, Case File No. SDR2006-00005 Dear Mr. Schonberger: The City has received the application for Site Development Review (SDR2006-00005) to construct a 15,000 square foot skate park on the City Hall site. The site consists of three parcels totaling 9.84 acres. Staff has completed a preliminary review of the submittal materials and has determined that the following additional information is necessary before the application can be deemed complete: ♦ Submit 6 copies of complete application packets. This includes plans and all application materials that have been submitted to the City. If items have been revised, please only include the revised version. ♦ Submit 10 additional copies of plan sets. These can be reduced size copies. ♦ Submit two sets of pre-stamped,pre-addressed envelopes. Property owner list must be produced by Patty Lunsford in the Planning Department, 503-639-4171, ext. 2438. Should you have any questions with regard to these items, please contact me at 503-718- 2437. Sincerely, Cheryl Caines Assistant Planner c: SDR2006-00005 Land Use File Dan Plaza,Parks & Facilities Manager,City of Tigard is\curpin\awry'\stir\sdr21N)6-INMM15\Tigard Skate Park\sdr21NIG-INNN15 incomplete 2.doc Phone: 503.639.4171 • Fax: 503.684.7297 • www.tigard-or.gov • TTY Relay: 503.684.2772 7_5 t 02 D 4 .4cO •PUBLIC FACILITY PLAN Project: :....,teboard Park COMPLETENESS CHECKLIST Date: 10/19/06 Shaw 4+5w ("Peet, xiG, LOT Wttc. r_, DING DIQAr6t1�1[�� l5 5(!RTE P v.6 1 it Existing and proposed contours shown. Proposed contours for skate park and impacted parking areas need to be shown ❑ Are there grading impacts on adjacent parcels? NA ❑ Adjacent parcel grades shown. NA ❑ Geotech study submitted? NA STREET ISSUES 3 Right-of-way clearly shown. Show dimensions Centerline of street(s) clearly shown. /1 Street name(s) shown. V Existing/proposed curb or edge of pavement shown. Show dimensions and discuss how you will meet the standards(see 18.810.030.A.5.0 ❑ Street profiles shown. NA ❑ Future Street Plan: Must show street profiles, topo NA on adjacent parcel(s), etc. ® Traffic Impact and/or Access Report Street grades compliant? 4!I0 Street/ROW widths dimensioned and appropriate? Show dimensioned dedication on plans IN Private Streets? Less than 6 lots and width NA RAW DE DICAT,OP1 appropriate? ❑ Other: Amu.- Be Do W ITU T,{ts (.fAA b SANITARY SEWER ISSUES t 6E ( Ful'uRe) ❑ Existing/proposed lines shown. ❑ Stubs to adjacent parcels required/shown? WATER ISSUES ❑ Existing/proposed lines w/ sizes noted? ❑ Existing/proposed fire hydrants shown? ❑ Proposed meter location and size shown? ❑ Proposed fire protection system shown? STORM DRAINAGE AND WATER QUALITY ISSUES ® Existing/proposed lines shown? ® Preliminary sizing calcs for water quality/detention provided? ® Water quality/detention facility shown on plans? ❑ Area for facility match requirements from calcs? ❑ Facility shown outside any wetland buffer? ❑ Storm stubs to adjacent parcels required/shown? I-9 d7 (Z-1E The submit I is hereby deemed IYCOMPLETE ( 9JCOMPLETE By: Date: 10/19/06 REVISED: 10/19/06 go 1 ILA-1701v 'Tb 5 Z/ Resom f 5 R&Q L(��"� )F[ZE.�[Se - N is: Rovw Mctct MEE7 5 LAME Al2-TGItiA C l��J City of Tigard, Oregon 13125 SW Hall Blvd. • Tigard, jR 97223 d T I GA RD January 19,2007 Ben Schonberger Winterbrook Planning 310 SW 4th Ave.,Suite 1100 Portland, OR 97204 RE: Completeness Review—Tigard Skate Park Site Development Review, Case File No. SDR2006-00005 Dear Mr. Schonberger: The City has received your application for Site Development Review (SDR2006-00005) to construct a 15,000 square foot skate park on the City Hall site. Staff has completed a preliminary review of your submittal materials and has determined that your application is now complete as of January 18, 2007. The formal comment and review process will now begin and typically takes 6-8 weeks to complete. If you have any questions regarding the project,please call me at 503-718-2437. Sincerely, Cam. Cheryl Caines Assistant Planner c: SDR2006-00005 Land Use File Dan Plaza,Parks& Facilities Manager, City of Tigard Phone: 503.639.4171 • Fax: 503.684.7297 • www.tigard-or.gov • TTY Relay: 503.684.2772 saloN DNEflI4MOD lNiOI ,I,VDI'IddV ilild CITY OF TIGARD 4111‘.-ate{ PRE-APPLICATION CONFERENCE NOTES Community�Devecopment Sloping A Better Community (Pre-Application Meeting Notes are Valid for Six (6) Months) FEFFP.roG DIE It -.71"/ 6144 s Ar d9C, NON-RESIDENTIAL APPLICANT: 0,.11-4-1 o f T, rj �; AGENT: -Dream land 6)464 P4..- Phone: ( ) Phone: (503) 577 — 9.277 "pantie l So oft' PROPERTY LOCATION: ADDRESS/GENERAL LOCATION: 131015 5 rn) i40-11 vd TAX MAP(S)/LOT #(S): ASloaDA •oo'.00 NECESSARY APPLICATIONS: ' �' '-r-- —•-� � 51)R — s; k e vet opme' Review) PROPOSAL DESCRIPTION: Is, 000 . . - 4. , 9 ska-, . Pamk_;n a..--e o-c ec-k 44.11 - COMPREHENSIVE PLAN MAP DESIGNATION: Cen 4vcc ( -1).xkitness ZONING MAP DESIGNATION: C'BD — C&.-1+-c 1 �$u.s%ness • ZONING DISTRICT DIMENSIONAL REQUIREMENTS [Refer to Code Section 18. • 1 MINIMUM LOT SIZE: none'- sq. ft. Average Min. lot width: _ft. Max. building height: ft. Setbacks: Front LI ft. Side (.13 ) ft. Rear Cpc ft. Corner o/3O ft. from street. MAXIMUM SITE COVERAGE: 55 % Minimum landscaped or natural vegetation area: %. F. NEIGHBORHOOD MEETING [Refer to the Neighborhood Meeting Randoutl THE APPLICANT SHALL NOTIFY ALL PROPERTY OWNERS WITHIN 500 FEET, INTERESTED PARTIES, AND THE CITY OF TIGARD PLANNING DIVISION of their proposal. A minimum of two (2) weeks between the mailing date and the meeting date is required. Please review the Land Use Notification handout concerning site posting and the meeting notice. Meeting is to be held prior to submitting your application or the application will not be accepted. * NOTE: In order to also preliminarily address building code standards, a meeting with a Plans Examiner is encouraged prior to submittal of a land use application. CITY OF TIGARD Pre-Application Conference Notes Page 1 of 3 NON-Residential Application/Planning Division Section • NARRATIVE (Refer to Code Chap.ur 183901 The APPLICANT SHALL SUBMIT A NARRATIVE which provides findings based on the applicable approval standards. Failure to provide a narrative or adequately address criteria would be reason to consider an application incomplete and delay review of the proposal. The applicant should review the code for applicable criteria. E IMPACT STUDY (Refer to Code Sections 18.390.040 and 18.390.050) As a part of the APPLICATION SUBMITTAL REQUIREMENTS, applicants are required to INCLUDE IMPACT STUDY with their submittal package. The impact study shall quantify the effect of the development on public facilities and services. The study shall address, at a minimum, the transportation system, including bikeways, the drainage system, the parks system, the water system, the sewer system and the noise impacts of the development. For each public facility system and type of impact, the study shall propose improvements necessary to meet City standards, and to minimize the impact of the development on the public at large, public facilities systems, and affected private property users. In situations where the Community Development Code requires the dedication of real property interests, the applicant shall either specifically concur with the dedication requirement, cr provide evidence which supports the conclusion that the real property dedication requirement is not roughly proportional to the projected impacts of the development. ACCESS (Refer to Chapters 18.705 and 18.7651 Minimum number of accesses: , Minimum access width: 5c. . Minimum pavement width: p)" ,30 f a aece.s.s eS . All driveways and parking areas, except for some fleet storage parking areas, must be paved. Drive-in use queuing areas: 2 WALKWAY REQUIREMENTS (Refer to Code Section 18.705.0301 WALKWAYS SHALL EXTEND FROM THE GROUND FLOOR ENTRANCES OR FROM THE GROUND FLOOR LANDING OF STAIRS, ramps, or elevators of all commercial, institutional, and industrial uses, to the streets which provide the required access and egress. Walkways shall provide convenient connections between buildings in multi-building commercial, institutional, and industrial complexes. Unless impractical, walkways should be constructed between a new development and neighboring developments. ❑ SPECIAL SETBACKS (Refer to Code Chapter 18.7301 > STREETS: feet from the centerline of > LOWER INTENSITY ZONES: feet, along the site's boundary. FLAG LOT: 10-FOOT SIDE YARD SETBACK. [ SPECIAL BUILDING HEIGHT PROVISIONS (Refer to Code Section 18.730.010.BJ BUILDING HEIGHT EXCEPTIONS - Buildings located in a non-residential zone may be built to a height of 75 feet provided that: > A maximum building floor area to site area ratio (FAR) of 1.5 to 1 will exist; > All actual building setbacks will be at least half (1/2) of the building's height; and > The structure will not abut a residential zoned district. BUFFERING AND SCREENING (Refer to Code Chapter 18.745) In order TO INCREASE PRIVACY AND TO EITHER REDUCE OR ELIMINATE ADVERSE NOISE OR VISUAL IMPACTS between adjacent developments, especially between different land uses, the City requires landscaped buffer areas along certain site perimeters. Required buffer areas are described by the Code in terms of width. Buffer areas must be occupied by a mixture of deciduous and evergreen trees and shrubs and must also achieve a balance between vertical and horizontal plantings. Site obscuring screens or fences may also be required; these are often advisable even if not required by the Code. The required buffer areas may only be occupied by vegetation, fences, utilities, and walkways. Additional information on required buffer area materials and sizes may be found in the Development Code. CITY OF TIGARD Pre-Application Conference Notes Page 2 of 8 NON-Residential Application/Planning Division Section The ESTIMATED REQUIREL BUFFER WIDTHS applicable to your proposal area are: feet along north boundary. feet along east boundary. feet along south boundary. feet along west boundary. IN ADDITION, SIGHT OBSCURING SCREENING IS REQUIRED ALONG: ❑ LANDSCAPING (Refer to Code Chapters 18.745,18.765 and 18.7051 STREET TREES ARE REQUIRED FOR ALL DEVELOPMENTS FRONTING ON A PUBLIC OR PRIVATE STREET as well as driveways which are more than 100 feet in length. Street trees must be placed either within the public right-of-way or on private property within six (6) feet of the right-of- way boundary. Street trees must have a minimum caliper of at least two (2) inches when measured four (4) feet above grade. Street trees should be spaced 20 to 40 feet apart depending on the branching width of the proposed tree species at maturity. Further information on regulations affecting street trees may be obtained from the Planning Division. A MINIMUM OF ONE (1) TREE FOR EVERY SEVEN (7) PARKING SPACES MUST BE PLANTED in and around all parking areas in order to provide a vegetative canopy effect. Landscaped parking areas shall include special design features which effectively screen the parking lot areas from view. These design features may include the use of landscaped berms, decorative walls, and raised planters. 1 1 RECYCLING (Refer to Code Chapter 18.755) Applicant should CONTACT FRANCHISE HAULER FOR REVIEW AND APPROVAL OF SITE SERVICING COMPATIBILITY. Locating a trash/recycling enclosure within a clear vision area such as at the intersection of two (2) driveways within a parking lot is prohibited. Much of Tigard is within Pride Disposal's Service area. Lenny Hing is the contact person and can be reached at (503) 625-6177. Fl PARKING [Refer to Code Section 18.765.040) REQUIRED parking for this type of use: Parking SHOWN on preliminary plan(s): SECONDARY USE REQUIRED parking: Parking SHOWN on preliminary plan(s): NO MORE THAN 50% OF REQUIRED SPACES MAY BE DESIGNATED AND/OR DIMENSIONED AS COMPACT SPACES. PARKING STALLS shall be dimensioned as follows: Standard parking space dimensions: 8 feet, 6 inches x 18 feet, 6 inches. Compact parking space dimensions: 7 feet, 6 inches x 16 feet, 6 inches. Note: Parking space width includes the width of a stripe that separates the parking space from an adjoining space. Note: A maximum of three (3) feet of the vehicle overhang area in front of a wheel stop or curb can be included as part of required parking space depth. This area cannot be included as landscaping for meeting the minimum percentage requirements. HANDICAPPED PARKING: All parking areas shall PROVIDE APPROPRIATELY LOCATED AND DIMENSIONED DISABLED PERSON PARKING spaces. The minimum number of disabled person parking spaces to be provided, as well as the parking stall dimensions, are mandated by the Americans with Disabilities Act (ADA). A handout is available upon request. A handicapped parking space symbol shall be painted on the parking space surface and an appropriate sign shall be posted. BICYCLE RACKS ARE REQUIRED FOR MULTI-FAMILY, COMMERCIAL AND INDUSTRIAL DEVELOPMENTS. Bicycle racks shall be located in areas protected from automobile traffic and in convenient locations. ❑ LOADING AREA REQUIREMENTS (Refer to Code Section 18.765.0801 Every COMMERCIAL OR INDUSTRIAL BUILDING IN EXCESS OF 10,000 SQUARE FEET shall be provided with a loading space. The space size and location shall be as approved by the City Engineer. CITY OF TIGARD Pre-Application Conference Notes Page 3 of 8 NON-Residential Application,Planning Division Section N1 BICYCLE RACKS (Refer to Code„lion 18.765) BICYCLE RACKS are required FOR MULTI-FAMILY, COMMERCIAL AND INDUSTRIAL DEVELOPMENTS. Bicycle racks shall be located in areas protected from automobile traffic and in convenient locations. E. SENSITIVE LANDS (Refer to Code Chapter 18.715) The Code provides REGULATIONS FOR LANDS WHICH ARE POTENTIALLY UNSUITABLE FOR DEVELOPMENT DUE TO AREAS WITHIN THE 100-YEAR FLOODPLAIN, NATURAL DRAINAGEWAYS, WETLAND AREAS, ON SLOPES IN EXCESS OF 25 PERCENT, OR ON UNSTABLE GROUND. Staff will attempt to preliminary identify sensitive lands areas at the pre- application conference based on available information. HOWEVER, the responsibility to precisely identify sensitive land areas, and their boundaries, is the responsibility of the applicant. Areas meeting the definitions of sensitive lands must be clearly indicated on plans submitted with the development application. Chapter 18.775 also provides regulations for the use, protection, or modification of sensitive lands areas. RESIDENTIAL DEVELOPMENT IS PROHIBITED WITHIN FLOODPLAINS. 1-1 STEEP SLOPES [Refer to Code Section 18.715.080.C) When STEEP SLOPES exist, prior to issuance of a final order, a geotechnical report must be submitted which addresses the approval standards of the Tigard Community Development Code Section 18.775.080.0. The report shall be based upon field exploration and investigation and shall include specific recommendations for achieving the requirements of Section 18.775.080.C. J' CLEANWATER SERVICES[CWS)BUFFER STANDARDS (Refer to R a 0 96-44/USA Regulations-Chapter 3] LAND DEVELOPMENT ADJACENT TO SENSITIVE AREAS shall preserve and maintain or create a vegetated corridor for a buffer wide enough to protect the water quality functioning of the sensitive area. Design Criteria: The VEGETATED CORRIDOR WIDTH is dependent on the sensitive area. The following table identifies the required widths: TABLE 3.1 VEGETATED CORRIDOR WIDTHS SOURCE: CWS DESIGN AND CONSTRUCTION STANDARDS MANUAL/RESOLUTION &ORDER 96-44 SENSITIVE AREA DEFINITION SLOPE ADJACENT WIDTH OF VEGETATED TO SENSITIVE AREA4 CORRIDOR PER SIDE5 • Streams with intermittent flow draining: <25% 15 feet 1 10 to <50 acres 1 >50 to <100 acres 25 feet • Existing or created wetlands <0.5 acre 25 feet • Existing or created wetlands >0.5 acre <25% l 50 feet • Rivers, streams, and springs with year-round flow • Streams with intermittent flow draining >100 acres • Natural lakes and ponds • Streams with intermittent flow draining: >25% 30 feet 1 10 to <50 acres 1 >50 to <100 acres 50 feet • Existing or created wetlands >25% Variable from 50-200 feet. Measure • Rivers, streams, and springs with year-round flow in 25-foot increments from the starting • Streams with intermittent flow draining >100 acres point to the top of ravine(break in • Natural lakes and ponds <25%slope), add 35 feet past the top of ravine' 4Starting point for measurement = edge of the defined channel (bankful flow) for streams/rivers, delineated wetland boundary, delineated spring boundary, and/or average high water for lakes or ponds, whichever offers greatest resource protection. Intermittent springs, located a minimum of 15 feet within the river/stream or wetland vegetated corridor, shall not serve as a starting point for measurement. 5Vegetated corridor averaging or reduction is allowed only when the vegetated corridor is certified to be in a marginal or degraded condition. 6The vegetated corridor extends 35 feet from the top of the ravine and sets the outer boundary of the vegetated corridor. The 35 feet may be reduced to 15 feet, if a stamped geotechnical report confirms slope stability shall be maintained with the reduced setback from the top of ravine. CITY OF TIGARD Pre-Application Conference Notes Page 4 of 8 NON-Residential Application/Planning Division Section Restrictions in the Vegetate, Jrridor: NO structures, development, construction activities, gardens, lawns, application of chemicals, dumping of any materials of any kind, or other activities shall be permitted which otherwise detract from the water quality protection provided by the vegetated corridor, except as provided for in the CWS Design and Construction Standards. Location of Vegetated Corridor: IN ANY RESIDENTIAL DEVELOPMENT WHICH CREATES MULTIPLE PARCELS or lots intended for separate ownership, such as a subdivision, the vegetated corridor shall be contained in a separate tract, and shall not be a part of any parcel to be used for the construction of a dwelling unit. CWS Service Provider Letter: PRIOR TO SUBMITTAL of any land use applications, the applicant must obtain a CWS Service Provider Letter which will outline the conditions necessary to comply with the R&O 96-44 sensitive area requirements. If there are no sensitive areas, CWS must still issue a letter stating a CWS Service Provider Letter is not required. Ni SIGNS (Refer to Code Chapter 18.1801 SIGN PERMITS MUST BE OBTAINED PRIOR TO INSTALLATION OF ANY SIGN in the City of Tigard. A "Guidelines for Sign Permits" handout is available upon request. Additional sign area or height beyond Code standards may be permitted if the sign proposal is reviewed as part of a development review application. Alternatively, a Sign Code Exception application may be filed for Director's review. NI' TREE REMOVAL PLAN REQUIREMENTS [Refer to Code Section 18.190.030.CJ A TREE PLAN FOR THE PLANTING, REMOVAL AND PROTECTION OF TREES prepared by a certified arborist shall be provided for any lot, parcel or combination of lots or parcels for which a development application for a subdivision, partition, site development review, planned development, or conditional use is filed. Protection is preferred over removal where possible. THE TREE PLAN SHALL INCLUDE the following: ➢ Identification of the location, size and species of all existing trees including trees designated as significant by the City; ➢ Identification of a program to save existing trees or mitigate tree removal over 12 inches in caliper. Mitigation must follow the replacement guidelines of Section 18.790.060.D according to the following standards and shall be exclusive of trees required by other development code provisions for landscaping, streets and parking lots: Retainage of less than 25% of existing trees over 12 inches in caliper requires a mitigation program according to Section 18.150.070.D. of no net loss of trees; Retainage of from 25 to 50% of existing trees over 12 inches in caliper requires that two- thirds of the trees to be removed be mitigated according to Section 18.790.060.D.; Retainage of from 50 to 75% of existing trees over 12 inches in caliper requires that 50% of the trees to be removed be mitigated according to Section 18.790.060.D.; Retainage of 75% or greater of existing trees over 12 inches in caliper requires no mitigation; ➢ Identification of all trees which are proposed to be removed; and ➢ A protection program defining standards and methods that will be used by the applicant to protect trees during and after construction. TREES REMOVED WITHIN THE PERIOD OF ONE (1) YEAR PRIOR TO A DEVELOPMENT APPLICATION LISTED ABOVE will be inventoried as part of the tree plan above and will be replaced according to Section 18.790.060.D. ® MITIGATION (Refer to Code Section 18.790.060.E1 REPLACEMENT OF A TREE shall take place according to the following guidelines: ➢ A replacement tree shall be a substantially similar species considering site characteristics. ➢ If a replacement tree of the species of the tree removed or damaged is not reasonably available, the Director may allow replacement with a different species of equivalent natural resource value. CITY OF TIGARD Pre-Application Conference Notes Page 5 of 8 NON-Residential Application/Planning Division Section ➢ If a replacement tre. ,f the size cut is not reasonably available on the local market or would not be viable, the Director shall require replacement with more than one tree in accordance with the following formula: 0 The number of replacement trees required shall be determined by dividing the estimated caliper size of the tree removed or damaged, by the caliper size of the largest reasonably available replacement trees. If this number of trees cannot be viably located on the subject property, the Director may require one(1) or more replacement trees to be planted on other property within the city, either public property or, with the consent of the owner, private property. ➢ The planting of a replacement tree shall take place in a manner reasonably calculated to allow growth to maturity. IN-LIEU OF TREE REPLACEMENT under Subsection D of this section, a party may, with the consent of the Director, elect to compensate the City for its costs in performing such tree replacement. • CLEAR VISION AREA (Refer to Code Chapter 18.7951 The City requires that CLEAR VISION AREAS BE MAINTAINED BETWEEN THREE (3) AND EIGHT (8) FEET IN HEIGHT at road/driveway, road/railroad, and road/road intersections. The size of the required clear vision area depends upon the abutting street's functional classification and any existing obstructions within the clear vision area. �J ADDITIONAL LOT DIMENSIONAL REQUIREMENTS (Refer to Code Section 18.810.060) MINIMUM LOT FRONTAGE: 25 feet unless lot is created through the minor land partition process. Lots created as part of a partition must have a minimum of 15 feet of frontage or have a minimum 15-foot-wide access easement. The DEPTH OF ALL LOTS SHALL NOT EXCEED 21/2 TIMES THE AVERAGE WIDTH, unless the parcel is less than 1'/2 times the minimum lot size of the applicable zoning district. CODE CHAPTERS - 18.330(Conditional use) 18.620(Tigard Triangle Design Standards) 7 18.765(Off-Street Parking/Loading Requirements) _ 18.340(Director's Interpretation) 18.630(Washington Square Regional Center) _ 18.775(Sensitive Lands Review) - 18.350(Punned Development) X 18.705(Access/Egress/Circulation) LS_ 18.780(Signs) 18.360(Site Development Review) 18.710(Accessory Residential Units) - 18.785(Temporary Use Permits) _ 18.370(Variances/Adjustments) 18.715(Density Computations) .2.._ 18.790(Tree Removal) - 18.380(Zoning Map/text Amendments) 18.720(Design Compatibility Standards) _& 18.795(Visual Clearance Areas) - 18.385(Miscellaneous Permits) ___<_. 18.725(Environmental Performance Standards) - 18.798(Wireless Communication Facilities) ' 18.390(Decision Making Proceduresllmpact Study) 18.730(Exceptions To Development Standards) , 18.810(Street&Utility Improvement Standards) - 18.410(Lot Line Adjustments) 18.740(Historic Overlay) - 18.420(Land Partitions) 18.742(Home Occupation Permits) - 18.430(Subdivisions) X 18.745(Landscaping&Screening Standards) - 18.510(Residential Zoning Districts) 18.750(Manufactured/Mobil Home Regulations) 18.520(Commercial Zoning Districts) 18.755(Mixed Solid Waste/Recycling Storage) - 18.530(Industrial Zoning Districts) 18.760(Nonconforming Situations) CITY OF TIGARD Pre-Application Conference Notes Page 6 of 8 NON-Residential Application/Planning Division Section • • ADDITIONAL CONCERNS OR COMMENTa. • Jibe Shitd bt isohod a4- ad a Lail 01C cie ve lop"'le), f' beecutJ-- aC Ciec ess p o ,,�r / )awl d sea pvti aid pa.r i . 'Par -Y,Bq bz b; me.. due -to h i lh cl mid f oou , kik/ &w 3 & ego- 0o.x rvv.t.iftis r P MPIuye zs ) u-kI i -i- j b4(1i4`1,,. �JL1 f� f11‘.4 ?EC r + ei-me- 111s;4w1. ) ?Je f hl a E r9-Tttrr1 0 4L .176e, PEcar vex� y;ti c: 0 N!WV Utz- (M to S i-tQ N 60.39 To B C 5 9e.).b - 1 oc b?+we e &► ►e, and 04 pet(act.) 1 a1 • -Nutt re 1 r-A-Lu_►-A) c ►- e c1►-�'c ,wi a,",1 a° ems' less M (4.)cr..) • /r r- c. La 7:5 /7/4--)e- C S A (;E. ca. t'rle-R l4 CE C to STg�t3 CM}i- 3E A-9 17c • Rg`DrG5■6N Lo i 7-14 at) r -C_T .SP•9-c�S + i n€ To 6%14... m oe?." S P RG�S * .c.}-r‘2..1•tt-., A S aCa•1't ��. C Q,_ 1_3' ] 04 1 t w -1 'rte *Pf -rise- S COE.V-,OcIC: Mir!see- j:en.sCJn• a PS V gie- c P s og. tCp e- N c-'r i Cw Pia s ��t-i: � • r=s_•...' : r9 SKfq-Te.,B0 z.p PRWC DDS At -r v ND Ft) 4 1L-4-►4 i 6 of- w sr,_fieCe00-61 c,S Rrav J Rwrw )0 9 3rrc 32.0 4s:t,rr- 4;54.2r wfct. aerial's, 8e..-0�►o pier St-r4 pur"' Dozy PROCEDURE /ice,.rrs r4.L1e T "•1 Furz aly 1.c CoearTT�,..li-Zn+140..tr Administrative Staff Review. .rSSL3e..S . /W4 S71-12:0' • n b silty-, 71 Jg•os., Public hearing before the Land Use Hearings Officer. 4e2J141.4.4-r /Nagy 70j' . Public hearing before the Planning Commission. /}p,};,C¢ iso cp 72 I-tt Public hearing before the Planning Commission with the Commission making a recommendation on the proposal to the City Council. An additional public hearing shall be held by the City Council. APPLICATION SUBMITTAL PROCESS All APPLICATIONS MUST BE ACCEPTED BY A PLANNING DIVISION STAFF MEMBER of the Community Development Department at Tigard City Hall offices. PLEASE NOTE: Applications submitted by mail or dropped off at the counter without Planning Division acceptance may be returned. The Planning counter closes at 5:00 PM. Maps submitted with an application shall be folded IN ADVANCE to 8W' x 11". One, 81/2" x 11" map of a proposed project shall be submitted for attachment to the staff report or administrative decision. Applications with unfolded maps shall not be accepted. The Planning Division and Engineering Department will perform a preliminary review of the application and will determine whether an application is complete within 30 days of the counter submittal. Staff will notify the applicant if additional information or additional copies of the submitted materials are required. CITY OF TIGARD Pre-Application Conference Notes Page 7 of 8 NON-Residential Application/Planning Division Section The administrative decisior, . public hearing will typically occur approximately 45 to 60 days after an application is accepted as being complete by the Planning Division. Applications involving difficult or protracted issues or requiring review by other jurisdictions may take additional time to review. Written recommendations from the Planning staff are issued seven (7) days prior to the public hearing. A 10-day public appeal period follows I. land use decisions. An appeal on this matter ; 2� would be heard by the Tigard 1- -rt.1Li' .3 Ta i .' . A basic flow chart which illustrates the review process is available from the Planning Division upon request. Land use applications requiring a public hearing must have notice posted on-site by the applicant no less than 10 days prior to the public hearing. This PRE-APPLICATION CONFERENCE AND THE NOTES OF THE CONFERENCE ARE INTENDED TO INFORM the prospective applicant of the primary Community Development Code requirements applicable to the potential development of a particular site and to allow the City staff and prospective applicant to discuss the opportunities and constraints affecting development of the site. BUILDING PERMITS PLANS FOR BUILDING AND OTHER RELATED PERMITS WILL NOT BE ACCEPTED FOR REVIEW UNTIL A LAND USE APPROVAL HAS BEEN ISSUED. Final inspection approvals by the Building Division will not be granted until there is compliance with all conditions of development approval. These pre-application notes do not include comments from the Building Division. For proposed buildings or modifications to existing buildings, it is recommended to contact a Building Division Plans Examiner to determine if there are building code issues that would prevent the structure from being constructed, as proposed. Additionally, with regard to Subdivisions and Minor Land Partitions where any structure to be demolished has system development charge (SDC) credits and the underlying parcel for that structure will be eliminated when the new plat is recorded, the City's policy is to apply those system development credits to the first building permit issued in the development (UNLESS OTHERWISE DIRECTED BY THE DEVELOPER AT THE TIME IN WHICH THE DEMOLITION PERMIT IS OBTAINED). PLEASE NOTE: The conference and notes cannot cover all Code requirements and aspects related to site planning that should apply to the development of your site plan. Failure of the staff to provide information required by the Code shall not constitute a waiver of the applicable standards or requirements. It is recommended that a prospective applicant either obtain and read the Community Development Code or ask any questions of City staff relative to Code requirements prior to submitting an application. AN ADDITIONAL PRE-APPLICATION FEE AND CONFERENCE WILL BE REQUIRED IF AN APPLICATION PERTAINING TO THIS PRE-APPLICATION CONFERENCE IS SUBMITTED AFTER A PERIOD OF MORE THAN SIX (6) MONTHS FOLLOWING THIS CONFERENCE (unless deemed as unnecessary by the Planning Division). PREPARED BY: CITY OF TIGAR PLANNING DIVISION - STAFF PERSON HOLDING PRE-APP. MEETING PHONE: 503-639-4171 FAX: 503-684-7297 EMAIL (staff's first name)©ci.tigard.or.us TITLE 18(CITY OF TIGARD'S COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT CODE)INTERNET ADDRESS: www.ci.tigard.or.us H:\patty\masters\Pre-App Notes Commercial.doc Updated: 15-Dec-04 (Engineering section: preapp eng) CITY OF TIGARD Pre-Application Conference Notes Page 8 of 8 NON-Res dental Application/Planning Division Section PRE-APPLICATION CONFERENCE NOTES ➢ ENGINEERING SECTION Q CItyof Tigard,Oregon Community Development Shaping Better Community PUBLIC FACILITIES Tax Map(s): 2S102DA Tax Lottsl: 400 Use Type: SDR The extent of necessary public improvements and dedications which shall be required of the applicant will be recommended by City staff and subject to approval by the appropriate authority. There will be no final recommendation to the decision making authority on behalf of the City staff until all concerned commenting agencies, City staff and the public have had an opportunity to review and comment on the application. The following comments are a projection of public improvement related requirements that may be required as a condition of development approval for your proposed project. Right-of-way dedication: The City of Tigard requires that land area be dedicated to the public: (1.) To increase abutting public rights-of-way to the ultimate functional street classification right-of-way width as specified by the Community Development Code; or (2.) For the creation of new streets. Approval of a development application for this site will require right-of-way dedication for: SW Hall Boulevard to 52 feet from centerline (5-lane Arterial) SW to feet SW to feet SW to feet Street improvements: Half street improvements will be necessary along SW Hall Boulevard (3-lane), to include: IX 36 feet of pavement from centerline ® concrete curb ® storm sewers and other underground utilities ® 10-foot concrete sidewalk with planter strip ® street trees sized and spaced per TDC ® street signs, traffic control devices, streetlights and a two-year streetlight fee. ® Other: Contact ODOT for additional ROW requirements for Hall Blvd realignment CITY OF TIGARD Pre-Application Conference Notes Page 1 of 6 Engineering Department Section street improvements will be necessary along SW , to include: feet of pavement concrete curb I storm sewers and other underground utilities -foot concrete sidewalk street trees I street signs, traffic control devices, streetlights and a two-year streetlight fee. Other: I I street improvements will be necessary along SW , to include: 1 1 feet of pavement concrete curb storm sewers and other underground utilities -foot concrete sidewalk I I street trees I I street signs, traffic control devices, streetlights and a two-year streetlight fee. i I Other: street improvements will be necessary along SW , to include: feet of pavement concrete curb I 1 storm sewers and other underground utilities 1 -foot concrete sidewalk street trees I 1 street signs, traffic control devices, streetlights and a two-year streetlight fee. I I Other: I I street improvements will be necessary along SW , to include: feet of pavement concrete curb storm sewers and other underground utilities -foot concrete sidewalk I I street trees street signs, traffic control devices, streetlights and a two-year streetlight fee. CITY OF TIGARD Pre-Application Conference Notes Page 2 of 6 Engineering Department Section I I Other: Agreement for Future Street Improvements: In some cases, where street improvements or other necessary public improvements are not currently practical, the improvements may be deferred. In such cases, a condition of development approval may be specified which requires the property owner(s) to provide a future improvement guarantee. The City Engineer will determine the form of this guarantee. The following street improvements may be eligible for such a future improvement guarantee: (1.) (2.) Overhead Utility Lines: 7 Section 18.810.120 of the Tigard Municipal Code (TMC) requires all overhead utility lines adjacent to a development to be placed underground or, at the election of the developer, a fee in-lieu of undergrounding can be paid. This requirement is valid even if the utility lines are on the opposite side of the street from the site. If the fee in-lieu is proposed, it is equal to $ 35.00 per lineal foot of street frontage that contains the overhead lines. There are existing overhead utility lines which run adjacent to this site along SW Hall Boulevard and Burnham Street. Prior to final inspection, the applicant shall either place these utilities underground, or pay the fee in-lieu described above. Sanitary Sewers: The nearest sanitary sewer line to this property is a(n) inch line which is located . The proposed development must be connected to a public sanitary sewer. It is the developer's responsibility to Water Supply: The City of Tigard (Phone:(503) 639-4171) provides public water service in the area of this site. This service provider should be contacted for information regarding water supply for your proposed development. Fire Protection: Tualatin Valley Fire and Rescue District (South Division) [Contact: Eric McMullen, (503) 612-7010] provides fire protection services within the City of Tigard. The District should be contacted for information regarding the adequacy of circulation systems, the need for fire hydrants, or other questions related to fire protection. Storm Sewer Improvements: All proposed development within the City shall be designed such that storm water runoff is conveyed to an approved public drainage system. The applicant will be required to submit a proposed storm CITY OFTIGARD Pre-Application Conference Notes Page 3 of 6 Engineering Department Section drainage plan for the site, anc, -'lay be required to prepare a sub-h—in drainage analysis to ensure that the proposed system will . .,mmodate runoff from upstream pi :rties when fully developed. Detention is required if the net, new impervious surface area exceeds 5000 square feet. Storm Water Quality: The City has agreed to enforce Surface Water Management (SWM) regulations established by the Unified Sewerage Agency (USA) (Resolution and Order No. 00-7) which requires the construction of on-site water quality facilities. The facilities shall be designed to remove 65 percent of the phosphorus contained in 100 percent of the storm water runoff generated from impervious surfaces. The resolution contains a provision that would allow an applicant to pay a fee in-lieu of constructing an on- site facility provided specific criteria are met. The City will use discretion in determining whether or not the fee in-lieu will be offered. If the fee is allowed, it will be based upon the amount of impervious surfaces created; for every 2,640 square feet, or portion thereof, the fee shall be $210. Preliminary sizing calculations for any proposed water quality facility shall be submitted with the development application. It is anticipated that this project will require: Construction of an on-site water quality facility. Payment of the fee in-lieu. Water quality treatment is required for all impervious surface area runoff, new and existing. Other Comments: All proposed sanitary sewer and storm drainage systems shall be designed such that City maintenance vehicles will have unobstructed access to critical manholes in the systems. Maintenance access roadways may be required if existing or proposed facilities are not otherwise readily accessible. 1) Water Master Plan shows the replacement of the 12-inch C.l. to 16-inch D.I. in Hall Boulevard 2) Contact ODOT for ROW and frontage improvement requirements exceeding the City's standards 3) Provide parking counts for City Hall employees, visitors, library staff/visitors and skaters. Show adequacy of parking after construction of skateboard park. 4) 18.705.020.8 Address this section in the narrative. Because access to the skate park will be over Tax Lot 401 the standards for SDR review apply. TRAFFIC IMPACT FEES In 1990, Washington County adopted a county-wide Traffic Impact Fee (TIF) ordinance. The Traffic Impact Fee program collects fees from new development based on the development's projected impact upon the City's transportation system. The applicant shall be required to pay a fee based upon the number of trips which are projected to result from the proposed development. The calculation of the TIF is based on the proposed use of the land, the size of the project, and a general use based fee category. The TIF shall be calculated at the time of building permit issuance. In limited circumstances, payment of the TIF may be allowed to be deferred until the issuance of an occupancy permit. Deferral of the payment until occupancy is permissible only when the TIF is greater than $5,000.00. CITY OF TIGARD Pre-Application Conference Notes Page 4 of 6 Engineering Department Section • Pay the TIF PERMITS Public Facility Improvement (PFI) Permit: Any work within a public right-of-way in the City of Tigard requires a PFI permit from the Engineering Department. A PFI permit application is available at the Planning/Engineering counter in City Hall. For more extensive work such as street widening improvements, main utility line extensions or subdivision infrastructure, plans prepared by a registered professional engineer must be submitted for review and approval. The Engineering Department fee structure for this permit is considered a cost recovery system. A deposit is collected with the application, and the City will track its costs throughout the life of the permit, and will either refund any remaining portion of the deposit, or invoice the Permittee in cases where City costs exceeds the deposit amount. NOTE: Engineering Staff time will also be tracked for any final design-related assistance provided to a Permittee or their engineer prior to submittal of a PFI permit application. This time will be considered part of the administration of the eventual PFI permit. The Permittee will also be required to post a performance bond, or other such suitable security. Where professional engineered plans are required, the Permittee must execute a Developer/Engineer Agreement, which will obligate the design engineer to perform the primary inspection of the public improvement construction work. The PFI permit fee structure is as follows: NOTE: If an PFI Permit is required,the applicant must obtain that permit prior to release of any permits from the Building Division. Building Division Permits: The following is a brief overview of the type of permits issued by the Building Division. For a more detailed explanation of these permits, please contact the Development Services Counter at 503-639-4171, ext. 304. Site Improvement Permit (SIT). This permit is generally issued for all new commercial, industrial and multi-family projects. This permit will also be required for land partitions where lot grading and private utility work is required. This permit covers all on-site preparation, grading and utility work. Home builders will also be required to obtain a SIT permit for grading work in cases where the lot they are working on has slopes in excess of 20% and foundation excavation material is not to be hauled from the site. Building Permit (BUP). This permit covers only the construction of the building and is issued after, or concurrently with, the SIT permit. Master Permit (MST). This permit is issued for all single and multi-family buildings. It covers all work necessary for building construction, including sub-trades (excludes grading, etc.). This permit can not be issued in a subdivision until the public improvements are substantially complete and a mylar copy of the recorded plat has been returned by the applicant to the City. CITY OF TIGARD Pre-Application Conference Notes Page 5 of 6 Engineering gepannlent Section • For a land partition, the -nplicant must obtain an Engineerin- permit, if required, and return a mylar copy of the recor plat to the City prior to issuance o. .s permit. Other Permits. There are other special permits, such as mechanical, electrical and plumbing that may also be required. Contact the Development Services Counter for more information. GRADING PLAN REQUIREMENTS FOR SUBDIVISIONS All subdivision projects shall require a proposed grading plan prepared by the design engineer. The engineer will also be required to indicate which lots have natural slopes between 10% and 20%, as well as lots that have natural slopes in excess of 20%. This information will be necessary in determining if special grading inspections will be required when the lots develop. The design engineer will also be required to shade all structural fill areas on the construction plans. In addition, each homebuilder will be required to submit a specific site and floor plan for each lot. The site plan shall include topographical contours and indicate the elevations of the corners of the lot. The builder shall also indicate the proposed elevations at the four corners of the building. PREPARED BY: `,,.,Mg v- AA." 7_7 —O(p ENGINEER N DEPARTMENT STAFF DATE Phone: [503)639-4171 Fax: [503)624-0752 document2 Revised September 2. 2003 CITY OF TIGARD Pre-Application Conference Notes Page 6 of 6 Engineering Department Section MEMORANDUM TO: Community Planning Department De artment Y�fII, Attention: Matt Scheidegger FROM: Dan Plaza / Dreamland Skateparks LLC RE: Pre-Application Conference Request DATE: April 7, 2005 Brief Description of the Proposal and any site-specific questions/issues.... The proposal is to construct a 15,000 sq. ft. in-ground, concrete skate park in the parking lot area of City Hall approved by Council. One questions is, "Does the CUP Application have to consider the entire City Hall parcel, campus if you will, or can it be limited to the skate park site?" The Site Plan, showing topographical information, is attached. The Proposed use is "recreational." Attachments: -skate park facility rendering - City of Tigard Civic Center "North" - Parking Lot Layout Option A PRE-APPLICATION A CONFERENCE REQUEST CITY OF TIGARD 13125 SW Hall Blvd., Tigard, OR 97223 (503) 639-4171 FAX (503) 684-7297 GENERAL INFORMATION/� ../ 1 45t /'I,fi, ('� FOR STAFF USE ONLY Applicant:PP D `e e-/9"/Z) ,yZ.‹ A CS L G Address: 9� 5 e� 'a / Phone's'3577 q? 77 Case No.: P&)Z -(v�'R City: 4 ,e/ci/� L/7 oR Zip: 97X 7 Receipt No.: Y / �3 �) Application Accepted By: �� Contact Person: PA(/ e/ �C Phone: 7 7, Date: ept f t Property Owner/Deed Holder(s): �- DATE OF PRE-APP.: ila 7//us _ // �"1 TIME OF PRE-APP.: /.. .‘ 1L Address: /3 . --- 5a1 /T1��/ g1�i) Phone: PRE APP. HELD WITH: C C._- City: / fr-r J 6 Zip: 97 2,2_ 3 Rev.7/1/05 i:\curpin\masters1revised\Pre-AppRequest.doc Property Address/Location(s): • REQUIRED SUBMITTAL ELEMENTS (Note: applications will not be accepted ��( �ZP4 without the required submittal elements) Tax Map &Tax Lot#(s): OD/7 o Zoning: e_y 7 ❑ Pre-Application Conf. Request Form Site Size: /5-0 7174— < 4 COPIES EACH OF THE FOLLOWING: [r Brief Description of the Proposal and PRE-APPLICATION any site-specific questions/issues that RE-APPLICATION CONFERENCE INFORMATION you would like to have staff research prior to the meeting. All of the information identified on this form are required to be submitted by the applicant and received by the Planning Division a Site Plan. The site plan must show the minimum of one (1) week prior to officially scheduling a proposed lots and/or building layouts pre-application conference date/time to allow staff ample time to drawn to scale. Also, show the location prepare for the meeting. of the subject property in relation to the nearest streets; and the locations of A pre-application conference can usually be scheduled within 1-2 driveways on the subject property and across the street. weeks of the Planning Division's receipt of the request for either Tuesday or Thursday mornings. Pre-application conferences are Fr The Proposed Uses. one (1) hour long and are typically held between the hours of o'Topographic Information. Include 9:00-11:00 AM. Contour Lines if Possible. PRE-APPLICATION CONFERENCES MUST BE SCHEDULED IN ❑ If the Pre-Application Conference is for PERSON AT THE COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT COUNTER FROM a MONOPOLE project, the applicant 8:00-4:00/MONDAY-FRIDAY. must attach a copy of the letter and proof in the form of an affidavit of IF MORE THAN 4 PEOPLE ARE EXPECTED TO ATTEND THE mailing, that the collocation protocol PRE-APPLICATION CONFERENCE IN YOUR GROUP, PLEASE was completed (see Section 18.798.080 INFORM THE CITY IN ADVANCE SO THAT ALTERNATE ROOM of the Tigard Community Development ARRANGEMENTS CAN BE MADE TO ACCOMMODATE THE Code). GROUP. ❑ Filing Fee $351.00 April 2006 May 2006 S M T W T F S S M T W T F S 30 1 J�`-' 9 3 4 5 6 2 8 2 3 4 5 6 7 B 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 - 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 23 24 25 26 1z7 1 2e 29 28 29 30 31 Thursday, April 27, 2006 -Pre-Apps CD Meetings Early 8:00 AM 9:00 AM (9:00 AM - 10:00 AM) Pre-App 10:00 AM (10:00 AM - 11:00 AM) Pre-App (Dan Plaza x2590 13125 SW Hall Blvd-Skate Park) 11:00 AM (11:00 AM-12:00 PM) Pre-App 12:00 PM 1:00 PM 2:00 PM 3:00 PM 4:00 PM Late Tasks Notes Kristie Peerman 1 3/6/2006-12:00 PM • 1 • ENGINEERING PLANNING LANDSCAPE ARCHITECTURE FORESTRY SURVEYING 13910 S.W.Galbreath Dr.,Suite 100 al Offices Located In: Sherwood,Oregon 97140 SHERWOOD,OREGON Phone:(503)925-8799 REDMOND,OREGON Fax:(503)925-8969 ENGINEERING&FORESTRY VANCOUVER,WASHINGTON www.aks-eng.com Date: May 9,2007 From: Randy Killen,Certified Arborist PN-5948A To: Dan Plaza City of Tigard 13125 SW Hall Blvd. Tigard,Oregon 97223 Re: Tree Report for Tigard Skate Park. Mr.Plaza, This report is for the area associated with the construction of the City of Tigard's Skate Park located at 13125 SW Hall Blvd,Tigard,Oregon(Tax lot 400). The purpose of this report is to provide the following: 1. An inventory of all trees on site; 2. Recommendations regarding which trees should be preserved; 3. A visual tree assessment for health and condition of the inventoried trees; 4. Construction management recommendations regarding required tree protection for preserved trees. All the trees inventoried in this report were evaluated and assessed based on their visual characteristics for overall health, wind firmness, and structural defects. Each tree has been assigned an identification number, along with a windthrow rating (See attached inventory table and site plan). The trees to be removed are either due to public improvements or they are rated as a"Hazard", which is defined as the combination of"a potential for failure of a tree or tree part" with a nearby "target or potential target" (person or property). Qualifications,Assumptions,and Limiting Conditions: 1. I am a Certified Arborist per the International Society of Arboriculture(Certificate number: PN- 5948A),and a Certified Tree Risk Assessor per the Pacific Northwest Chapter of the International Society of Arboriculture(Certificate number: PN-198). I also possess a Bachelor's Degree from the University of Kansas in Environmental studies. My resume is attached. 2. The determination of which trees are considered to be"Hazardous"is based on experience, education,and industry standards as outlined in"Evaluation of Hazard Trees in Urban Areas"by Matheny and Clark. AKS Engineering&Forestry Page 1 of 9 Tree Report for the City of Tigard Skate Park May 9,2007 3. Care has been taken to obtain all information from reliable sources. All data has been verified in so far as possible; however,the consultant/appraiser can neither guarantee nor be responsible for the accuracy of information provided by others. 4. The field inspection was limited to visual inspection of the trees on site. Observation: The site is currently developed for use as an office building and parking area. On May 9, 2007,I visited the site to perform an assessment of the trees located on site. The majority of the trees are located within planter strips that encompass the parking areas. Except for one notable exception,all of the trees on site have a low potential of failure. The tree with a moderate to high potential of failure is a 34-inch Douglas fir(Pseudotsuga menziesii)(Tree# 10888);which has evidence of basal decay and heart rot located in the base of its trunk. (See attach Hazard Evaluation Form) While performing a visual assessment on the 34-inch Douglas fir,I discovered the heart wood located at the prune cut of the co-dominate stem that was previously removed to have decay. Upon further investigation, using the sounding mallet on the base of the tree,the north side of the tree had a hollow sound. Without further testing using a Resistograph(a machine that measures the internal decay)to determine the ratio of decay to solid wood present within the stem of the trunk of the tree the extent of the decay can not be determined. The remaining trees on site appear to be healthy and vigorous. The only prominent health condition that was observed was a mild to moderate"root girdling"in all of the Sweetgum trees. Discussion: The fungi of heart rot,usually gain entrance into a sound and healthy tree through a wound that was caused by branch failures,pruning wound, fire,vandalism,insects, or machine damage(or some or all of the above). The cambium(the layer behind the wood and the bark of the tree)has been damaged enough to expose the xylem(the"wood"of the tree that provides nutrients throughout the tree)and allow oxygen and airborne pathogens to penetrate into the tree. "Generally, trees can experience approximately one-third loss in strength,equivalent to approximately 70%loss in total wood diameter inside the bark,without materially affecting its safety if not complicated by other defects." Heart rot generally leads to stem failure. Root girdling is a common occurrence associated with trees grown in a container prior to be planted in the landscape. Girdling roots associated with nursery grown trees usually does not cause a tree to be unstable, since the most seriously affected trees tend to fail prior to the tree maturing to the size where it would become unstable. The problems associated with girdling roots can be minimized by requiring girdling root-free nursery stock and by removing any significant girdling roots that develop on the trees. Windthrow: All trees can be susceptible to windthrow. Various elements of the individual tree,surrounding trees, soils,and topography affect the likelihood of windthrow. Individual tree traits affecting windthrow include height,crown size,diameter,shape of bole, and tree AKS Engineering&Forestry Page 2 of 9 Tree Report for the City of Tigard Skate Park May 9,2007 health. Taller trees with larger crowns are subject to larger wind forces. The height to diameter at breast height(4.5 feet above the uphill side of the tree)ratio is an indicator. A height to diameter ratio of 60 or less(a more conical shaped bole)is considered more windfirm,and a height to diameter ratio of 100 or more(a tall,skinny,"telephone pole"shaped bole)is less wind firm. Individual tree defects including bole rot and root rot also increase the chances of windthrow. Dominant and co-dominant trees(the larger trees in an even aged stand)are less susceptible to windthrow than the smaller suppressed trees. Trees less than 60 feet tall are also generally more wind firm. Other items being equal,older, over-mature trees also have a greater chance of windthrow. The proximity of adjacent trees and the growth pattern and history of those trees also greatly affects the chances of windthrow. Trees that are open grown from a young age are generally windthrow resistant. Well-stocked even aged stands of second growth(generally Douglas-fir)on a good growing site rely on the group of trees to work together to withstand storms. This is provided by interlocking root systems, inter-tree crown damping during swaying,and dense crowns to reduce wind penetration. Younger stands are typically more windfirm than older stands. The soils characteristics that affect windthrow are depth,drainage,and the soils structure and the resulting shear strength. Deep soils allowing root penetration of greater than 3 feet to a restricting layer are more windthrow resistant. Shallow soils allowing root penetration of 1 foot or less are less windfirm. Dry soils generally have greater shear strength than wet soils. Well-drained soils are drier more often and therefore more windthrow resistant. Poorly drained soils also restrict root growth and are more windthrow prone. The topography aspects that effect windthrow include the wind exposure and the wind direction,speed and turbulence. Certain types of topography can"compress"wind streamlines(causing higher winds) including flowing through narrow valleys,over hills and ridges and around shoulders. In the lee of large ridges and even small hills,a turbulent wake develops eddies that can have strong vertical velocities. This site contains mixture of Sweet gum,Douglas-fir, Sycamore,and Pear trees with a range of windthrow hazards. The trees are planted in raised planter strips with soils that have been disturbed causing unknown conditions regarding the rooting depth of these trees. The site is located on a developed site with level ground. The trees on the site have been evaluated for windthrow based on the above items. A windthrow risk rating of High,Moderate, and Low. It should be noted that even healthy wind resistant trees could fail under normal and storm conditions. The only way to eliminate all risk is to remove all trees within reach of all targets. Annual monitoring can reduce the potential tree failures. Guidelines for the Area Required for Preserving a Tree: Trees can be an inexact science,but there are some guidelines that can be used to evaluate the amount of disturbance to a tree's root system that can occur without seriously effecting tree health. These guidelines take into account various factors including species tolerance, tree age (in its life cycle), and the overall health of the individual tree, type of disturbance and the total area of disturbance. The guidelines were taken from the book "Trees and Development-A Technical Guide to Preservation of Trees during Land Development" 1998,by Nelda Matheny and James R. Clark. AKS Engineering &Forestry Page 3 of 9 Tree Report for the City of Tigard Skate Park May 9, 2007 The book states, "a healthy tree tolerates removal of approximately one-third of its roots". It also states, "a healthy vigorous tree could withstand removal of up to 50 percent of its roots without dying". In order to preserve a tree, an area around that tree must be protected to ensure that the tree is not physically damaged, and that the roots are protected. A method to calculate this area, utilizes the diameter at breast height(DBH),species, and age. The DBH is multiplied by a factor(the factor is based on the tree age and the species tolerance for disturbance)from 0.5 feet radius to 1.5 feet radius (from the trunk-often 1 foot radius per inch DBH is used for an average),and this area is called the "Optimal Tree Protection Zone". The general guidelines for preservation are that you do not want to disturb more than 1/3 of this area,but that with healthy vigorous trees,up to 50%of the area could be disturbed. Within the Optimal Tree Protection Zone that is not being disturbed, a tree protection fence needs to be staked out by a surveyor as shown on the attached sketch "Tree Protection Plan" and installed prior to beginning any additional construction activities. Within the tree protection fence, no soil disturbance, including stripping, is permitted. The natural grade is to be maintained, and no storage or dumping of materials, parking, etc. will be allowed within this zone without the approval of the arboricultural consultant. This tree protection fence should remain in place through the construction of the buildings. Where there is excavation proposed within an"Optimal Tree Protection Zone" (outside of the protected zone fenced off above), it will be important for the contractor to prune the roots along the excavation lines as outlined in this report. The Project Arborist should be on site for all excavation within the Optimal Tree Protection Zone and should also review and evaluate both trees after construction. If fencing needs to be moved closer to a tree or group of trees, for the ease of construction, then the project arborist should be contacted for additional evaluation. Designing for Tree Preservation: Designing for tree preservation means that trees are considered an important project feature. The goal of tree preservation is to have trees remain safe assets to the site for years to come. Trees that are preserved must be carefully selected to make sure that they will survive the construction impacts, adapt to the new environment, and perform well in the new landscape. An assessment of suitability for preservation evaluates tree health,structure, age, and species factors. The consultant gathers information on the individual trees, and makes recommendations as to which trees are suitable for preservation, and how much undisturbed space they will require. The consultant also provides specific guidelines regarding grading, drainage,trenching,protected areas,root pruning, etc. Tree Characteristics and Their Suitability for Preservation: Trees vary in their suitability for preservation both based on their inherent characteristics, and their future response to construction impacts. Trees that are structurally unstable,in poor health, or are unlikely to survive construction impacts could be a dangerous liability to future neighborhoods. A good tree preservation plan will call for the pre-construction removal of trees likely to die or to become a tree with a higher than acceptable risk of failure after construction. The factors to be evaluated are: Tree Health-Healthy,vigorous trees are better able than non-vigorous trees to tolerate construction related stresses such as root removal, changes in grade, changes in soil moisture, and soil compaction. AKS Engineering&Forestry Page 4 of 9 Tree Report for the City of Tigard Skate Park May 9, 2007 These healthy trees are also better able to adapt to the changed site conditions that occur after development. Tree Structure-Trees with defects such as decayed wood,poor crown structure from past manual "topping"or natural broken tops, and co-dominant trunks with poor attachments are not suitable for preservation in areas where people or property could be injured or damaged. Such defects cannot be treated and may lead to failure. Species-Although trees require protection to avoid injury,species vary widely in their ability to withstand damage and changes in their environment. Tree Age-As a tree age, its capacity to overcome injury, adapt to changes in its site environment, and to resist pests; declines. For these reasons, mature and over-mature trees are less able to tolerate construction impacts and remain assets than are young and semi-mature trees. Young vigorous trees are better able to generate new tissue and adapt to a new environment than old trees. Tree Size/Height-Larger, taller trees are capable of hitting targets a greater distance away from the tree, and causing greater damage. Taller trees also provide a larger wind"sail", catching more wind and being more prone to being blown down in a large storm. Coupling this "sail"effect with the structural weakening of root removal/disturbance can lead to a higher than acceptable blow down risk. Tree Location-The best candidates for preservation are single trees that developed as individual specimens, as they typically have uniform canopies and well tapered trunks. Trees that grow in groups do not function well as individuals. They often have tall,poorly shaped trunks, irregularly shaped crowns, and are prone to failure and decline when their neighbors are removed. The arboricultural consultant weighs each of the above factors, and makes recommendations as to which trees are likely to thrive and be a long-term asset to the new development, as well as recommendations to remove those trees that will likely have an unacceptable risk of failure and become a liability in the new development. How to Preserve Trees during Construction: The portion of the"Optimal Tree Protection Zone"that is being protected must be fenced off(with a "substantial" fence). Within this area, no soil disturbance, including stripping is permitted. The natural grade is to be maintained, and no storage or dumping of materials,parking, etc. will be allowed within this zone without the approval of the arboricultural consultant. This tree protection fence should remain in place through the construction of the dwellings. Excavation within the "Optimal Tree Protection Zone": Where there is excavation proposed within an"Optimal Tree Protection Zone"(outside of the protected zone fenced off above), it will be important for the contractor to prune the roots along the excavation lines. These roots should be pruned in the following manner: • Excavation in the top 24"of the soil in the critical root zone area should begin at the excavation line that is closest to the tree. • The excavation should be done by hand/shovel or with a backhoe and a man with a shovel,pruning shears and a pruning saw. AKS Engineering & Forestry Page 5 of 9 Tree Report for the City of Tigard Skate Park May 9,2007 • If done by hand all roots 1"or larger should be pruned at the excavation line. • If done with a backhoe(most likely scenario)then the operator needs to start the cut at the excavation line and carefully"feel"for roots/resistance. When there is resistance,the man with the shovel hand digs around the roots and prunes the roots larger that 1"diameter. • The backhoe is to remain off the tree roots at all times. • The work will be done under the supervision of the Project Consulting Arborist. The above system works well and can be done quickly. The key is to avoid pulling on the roots larger than 1"diameter,potentially resulting in damage to roots between the excavation line and the tree. How Trees Die: Natural tree death is frequently a slow and complex process generally with a gradual decline involving a number of factors. Most trees die from one of three causes: (1) Structural failure,(2)Environmental degradation, or(3)pest infestation. Generally, trees die from a combination of factors. Trees weakened by changes in their environment(such as construction impacts)become more susceptible to infestation by disease and insects. Most individual trees survive for only a fraction of the potential lifespan of the species. Soil compaction, changes in grade,mechanical injury, changes in the environment around the tree, and changes in drainage may not kill the tree of themselves,but they may so weaken the tree that death by another cause occurs. Prevention of stress and the maintenance of health are the key elements of tree longevity. Development Affects Effecting Preserved Trees: Construction of the site improvements generally consists of cut and fills(grading),construction of retaining walls,trenching for the wet and dry utilities,coring of roads and placement of aggregate and pavement. During this work,adjacent soil areas outside of the grading can be compacted by heavy equipment driving over it. The grading and placement of utility trenches(and subsequent pipe bedding), and retaining walls can affect the local water table. Construction of the structures and landscaping requires foundation placement,pruning of trees near the structure under construction,and the installation of lawn irrigation systems. During this work,adjacent soil areas outside of the work area can be compacted by equipment driving over it. Future Condition of Trees on the Site: The characteristics of the individual tree are a guide to how well that tree will respond to site disturbance. Larger trees have correspondingly larger root zones. Older trees are less resilient to disturbance. Unhealthy trees are less resilient to disturbance than healthy trees. Douglas-fir trees are tolerant of a small amount of fill,but intolerant of poor drainage. Western red cedar trees are intolerant of fill and changes in the water table/soil moisture conditions. This site has predominantly Sweetgum and London plane tree with some scattered minor species. Development of this site will result in a relatively slight area of disturbance. The disturbance to the trees will occur during the construction of the skate park and its adjacent parking lot. This will include root disturbance,pruning,trenching, and soil compaction. All of these factors will add to the stress of each preserved tree. Tree Inventory (See Attachment) AKS Engineering&Forestry Page 6 of 9 Tree Report for the City of Tigard Skate Park May 9,2007 Conclusions& Recommendations: In closing,the trees on site are located in planter strips that encompass the existing parking areas. With the exception of the 34-inch Douglas fir that possesses basal decay and heart rot,the remaining trees onsite appear to be healthy. A relatively small percentage of the trees onsite will be effected by the construction of the skate park and it's adjacent parking area. Due to the moderate to high potential of failure caused by the structural defects of tree# 1088 (34-inch Douglas fir) and that this tree has a full canopy and is the tallest tree in the area,makes it susceptible to the prevailing winds. This along with the high value targets within striking distance makes this tree a "high-risk tree". However,without knowing the amount of decay present in the stem of the trunk a fully accurate assessment of this tree can not be made at this time. If the results of the test show the decay is minimal,this tree could be safe for many years. I recommend that further testing be done to this tree using a Resistograph to determine the ratio of decay to solid wood present within the stem of the tree. Then the tree can be accurately assessed. The four trees that are to be removed due to the construction of the skate park and its associated parking area, require no tree mitigation nor is a tree removal permit required for this site, since the trees being removed are less than 12 inches in diameter at breast height and none of the trees to be removed are within a sensitive land area as define Per Tigard City Tree Ordinance 18.790. The placement of the tree protection fence was calculated using the guideline, that one-third to one-half of the tree's root protection zone could be disturbed and was located only for the trees within the construction area. The trees outside the construction area will not require a tree protection fence since they are "behind the curbs"in raised planter strips. Please let me know if you have any questions. Very Truly Yours, AKS Engineering& Forestry,LLC. CERTIFIED re w _ ■1 w_-w �► i ter. 'r. ARBORIST RANDY KILLEN CERTIFICATE NUMBER PN-5948A EXPIRATION DATE 12/31/2008 Randy Killen Certified Arborist PN-5948A Certified Tree Risk Assessor Cc: Keith Jehnke,Principle; AKS Engineering and Forestry Encl. AKS Engineering&Forestry Page 7 of 9 Tree Report for the City of Tigard Skate Park May 9,2007 Arborist Disclosure Statement Arborists are tree specialists who use their education, knowledge,training, and experience to examine trees,recommend measures to enhance the health of trees,and attempt to reduce the risk of living near trees. The Client and Jurisdiction may choose to accept or disregard the recommendations of the arborist, or seek additional advice. Arborists cannot detect every condition that could possibly lead to the structural failure of a tree. Trees are living organisms that fail in ways we do not fully understand. Conditions are often hidden within trees and below ground. Arborists cannot guarantee that a tree will be healthy or safe under all circumstances,or for a specified period of time. Likewise,remedial treatments, like medicine,cannot be guaranteed. Trees can be managed,but they cannot be controlled. To live near trees is to accept some degree of risk. The only way to eliminate all risk associated with trees is to eliminate all trees. AKS Engineering&Forestry Page 8 of 9 Tree Report for the City of Tigard Skate Park May 9,2007 RANDY M. KILLEN, Certified Arborist, Inspector Mr. Killen has proficient knowledge in the environmental EDUCATION: field,utilizing his knowledge in the inspection and arborist Tree Risk Assessment in Urban Areas and the Urban/Rural fields working on many types of projects. His surveying Interface Course experience includes site,lot,topographic,boundary,and Pacific Northwest Chapter of the construction surveys. As a Certified Arborist,he performs International Society of Arboriculture field inspections,tree inventories,tree protection plans,and 2007 reports. He performs workout the Portland Metro area. As an inspector,he insures that contractors are building the sites BS Environmental Policy to standards outlined in the design plans. He is a direct Political Science Minor liaison between the contractors and project engineers and University of Kansas 2000 enforces local government standards and performs site inspections.Mr.Killen submits daily inspection reports to Majored in Soil&Water the project engineer and to the corresponding city engineers. Agronomy Kansas State University Clean Water Services, Erosion Control Inspection, Tualatin, Tigard, Sherwood, Washington County, LICENSES: Oregon: AKS has the services contract with CWS and is Certified Professional in Erosion and providing all of the erosion control inspection for Clean Water Sediment Control Services in the Cities Tualatin,Tigard and Sherwood. CWS (Certification No.3376) contact is Mike McGough. International Society of Arboriculture Holt Homes INC. Vista Loop South, Tree Inventory Certified Arborist (Certification No. PN-5948A) and Tree Plan, City of Sandy, Oregon,: Performed a tree inventory, tree plan, and a tree report for a proposed 38 Pacific Northwest Chapter of the lot residential development project in accordance to the City of International Society of Arboriculture Sandy's development codes. Certified Tree Risk Assessor (Certification No. 198) Business Investment Group, LLC Northern Heights, Tree removal Permit City of Happy Valley, Oregon: PROFESSIONAL Performed a tree inventory and tree plan for a tree removal MEMBERSHIP permit for a 23 lot residential development project in AFFILIATIONS: International Society of Arboriculture accordance to the city of Happy Valley's development codes. Pacific Northwest Chapter of the GH Properties, Laurain Grove, Tree Report, City of International Society of Arboriculture Portland, Oregon: Reviewed the existing trees on site and provide a tree protection plan, tree report, tree inventory, and International Erosion Control recommendations for preservation or removal of trees for a 7 Association lot residential development in accordance to the city of MILITARY: Portland development codes. 1989-1994-US Army-Deep Sea Salvage Diver Way Lee General Contractors, SW 68th Commercial Site, City of Tigard, Oregon: Performed a tree inventory 2001-2005-Oregon National Guard - for a tree removal permit for a commercial development Commanding Officer DET-218th Field project in accordance to the city of Tigard's development Artillery Unit codes. Surround Architecture, INC, Sherman Street lofts, City of Hood River, Oregon: Performed a tree inventory and tree plan for a residential development project in accordance to the city of Hood River development codes. AKS Engineering&Forestry Page 9 of 9 Tree Report for the City of Tigard Skate Park May 9, 2007 Detailed Tree Inventory For Tigard Skate park NO. 18.02_ Basal Additional Survey (in.) Tree (sq.feet) Reason for Windthrow `"Save/ Area "`Mitigation Reference# DBH Species Basal Area Condition/Comments Removal Rating* Remove Left Required 345 10 Sweetgum(Liquidambar styraciflua) 0.55 Healthy Preserve B 1 0.55 0 346 12 Sweetqum(Liquidambar styraciflua) 0.79 Healthy Preserve B 1 0.79 0 347 12 Sweetgum(Liquidambar styraciflua) 0.79 Healthy Preserve B 1 0.79 0 348 13 Sweetqum(Liquidambar styraciflua) 0.92 Healthy Preserve B 1 0.92 0 349 11 Sweetgum(Liquidambar styraciflua) 0.66 Healthy Preserve B 1 0.66 0 350 9 Sweetgum(Liquidambar styraciflua) 0.44 Healthy Preserve B 1 0.44 0 351 11 Sweetgum(Liquidambar styraciflua) 0.66 Healthy Preserve B 1 0.66 0 352 11 Sweetgum(Liquidambar styraciflua) 0.66 Healthy Preserve B 1 0.66 0 354 12 Sweetgum(Liquidambar styraciflua) 0.79 Roots show sings of girdling.(OK) Preserve B 1 0.79 0 355 10 Sweetgum(Liquidambar styraciflua) 0.55 Roots show sings of girdling.(OK) Preserve B 1 0.55 0 356 13 Sweetgum(Liquidambar styraciflua) 0.92 Roots show sings of girdling.(OK) Preserve B 1 0.92 0 357 10 Sweetgum(Liquidambar styraciflua) 0.55 Roots show sings of girdling.(OK) Preserve B 1 0.55 0 358 11 Sweetgum(Liquidambar styraciflua) 0.66 Roots show sings of girdling.(OK) Preserve B 1 0.66 0 359 10 Sweetgum(Liquidambar styraciflua) 0.55 Roots show sings of girdling.(OK) Preserve B 1 0.55 0 360 10 Sweetgum(Liquidambar styraciflua) 0.55 Roots show sings of girdling.(OK) Preserve B 1 0.55 0 361 12 Sweetgum(Liquidambar styraciflua) 0.79 Roots show sings of girdling.(OK) Preserve B 1 0.79 0 362 10 Sweetgum(Liquidambar styraciflua) 0.55 Roots show sings of girdling.(OK) Preserve B 1 0.55 0 363 11 Sweetgum(Liquidambar styraciflua) 0.66 Roots show sings of girdling.(OK) Preserve B 1 0.66 0 387 11 London plane tree(Platanus hybrida) 0.66 Healthy Preserve C 1 0.66 0 388 11 London plane tree(Platanus hybrida) 0.66 Healthy Preserve C 1 0.66 0 389 17 London plane tree(Platanus hybrida) 1.58 Healthy Preserve C 1 1.58 0 390 13 London plane tree(Platanus hybrida) 0.92 Healthy Preserve C 1 0.92 0 391 14 London plane tree(Platanus hybrids) 1.07 Healthy Preserve C 1 1.07 0 392 13 London plane tree(Platanus hybrida) 0.92 Healthy Preserve C 1 0.92 0 393 9 London plane tree(Platanus hybrida) 0.44 Healthy Preserve C 1 0.44 0 394 11 Kwanzan cherry(Prunus serrulata) 0.66 Healthy 'ublic Improvement C 0 0.00 0 395 11 Kwanzan cherry(Prunus serrulata) 0.66 Healthy 'ublic Improvement C 0 0.00 0 396 10 Kwanzan cherry(Prunus serrulata) 0.55 Healthy 'ublic Improvement C 0 0.00 0 397 7 Gallery pear(Pyrus calleryana) 0.27 Healthy Preserve C 1 0.27 0 398 9 Gallery pear(Pyrus calleryana) 0.44 Healthy Preserve C 1 0.44 0 399 7 Callery pear(Pyrus calleryana) 0.27 Healthy Preserve C 1 0.27 0 400 9 Gallery pear(Pyrus calleryana) 0.44 Tree needs to he pruned.(OK) Preserve C 1 0.44 0 424 19 Pacific silver fir(Abies amabilis) 1.97 Healthy Preserve C 1 1.97 0 447 9 Callery pear(Pyrus calleryana) 044 Healthy Preserve C 1 0.44 0 651 11 Sweetgum(Liquidambar styraciflua) 0.66 Healthy Preserve B 1 0.66 0 667 11 Sweetgum(Liquidambar styraciflua) 0.66 Healthy Preserve B 1 0.66 0 tree Inventory of Tigard Skate Park.xls 1 of 3 05/09/07 Basal Additional Survey (in.) Tree (sq.feet) Reason for Windthrow **Save/ Area "'Mitigation Reference# DBH Species Basal Area _ Condition/Comments Removal Rating* Remove Left Required - 799 11 Sweetgum(Liquidambar styraciflua) 0.66 Healthy Preserve B 1 0.66 0 800 _- 7 European beech (Fagus sylvatica) 0.27 Healthy Preserve C 1 0.27 0 801 7 European beech (Fagus sylvatica) 0.27 Healthy Preserve C 1 0.27 0 802 7 European beech (Fagus sylvatica) 0.27 healthy Preserve C 1 0.27 0 803 6 European beech (Fagus sylvatica) 0.20 Healthy Preserve C 1 _ 0.20 0 a cavity is suspected.Recommend further testing to determine if should be 1088 34 Douglas fir(Pseudotsuga menziesii) 6.30 removed.Tree is a"high Risk tree. Hazard 8- 0 0.00 0 1089 10 Sweetgum(Liquidambar styraciflua) 0.55 Roots show sings of girdling.(OK) Preserve B _-- 1 0.55 0 1090 14 Sweetgum(Liquidambar styraciflua) 1.07 Roots show sings of girdling.(OK) Preserve B 1 1.07 0 1091 14 Sweetgum(Liquidambar styraciflua) 1.07 Roots show sings of girdling.(OK) Preserve B 1 1.07 0 1092 9 Sweetgum(Liquidambar styraciflua) 0.44 Roots show sings of girdling.(OK) Preserve B 1 0.44 0 1093 11 Sweetgum(Liquidambar styraciflua) 0.66 Roots show sings of girdling.(OK) Preserve B 1 0.66 0 1127 3 red maple(Acer rubrum) 0.05 Healthy 'ublic improvement C 0 0.00 0 1128 4 red maple(Acer rubrum) 0.09 Healthy Preserve C 1 0.09 0 1129 7 Sweetgum(Liquidambar styraciflua) 0.27 Healthy Preserve B 1 0.27 0 1130 8 Sweetgum(Liquidambar styraciflua) 0.35 Roots show sings of girdling.(OK) Preserve B 1 0.35 0 1131 6 Sweetgum(Liquidambar styraciflua) 0.20 Roots show sings of girdling.(OK) Preserve 3 1 0.20 0 1132 4 red maple(Acer rubrum) 0.09 Healthy Preserve C 1 0.09 0 1133 7 sycamore(Platanus Spp.) 0.27 Healthy Preserve C 1 0.27 0 1134 7 sycamore(Platanus Spp.) 0.27 Healthy Preserve C 1 0.27 0 1135 18 sycamore(Platanus Spp.) 1.77 Healthy Preserve C 1 1.77 0 1136 14 sycamore(Platanus Spp.) 1.07 Healthy Preserve C 1 1.07 0 1137 15 _ sycamore(Platanus Spp.) 1.23 Healthy Preserve C 1 1.23 0 _ 15000 10 Sweetgum(Liquidambar styraciflua) 0.55 Healthy Preserve B 1 0.55 0 15001 10 Callery pear(Pyrus calleryana) 0.55 Healthy Preserve C 1 0.55 0 15002 9 Gallery pear(Pyrus calleryana) 0.44 Healthy Preserve C 1 0.44 0 15003 9 Callery pear(Pyrus calleryana) 0.44 Healthy Preserve C 1 0.44 0 15004 9 Callery pear(Pyrus calleryana) 0.44 Healthy Preserve C 1 0.44 0 15006 7 Callery pear(Pyrus calleryana) 0.27 Healthy Preserve C 1 0.27 0 15007 19 London plane tree(Platanus hybrida) 1.97 Healthy Preserve C 1 1.97 0 15008 18 London plane tree(Platanus hybrida) 1.77 healthy Preserve C 1 1.77 0 15009 20 London plane Tree(Platanus hybrida) 2.18 Healthy Preserve C 1 2.18 0 15010 20 London plane tree(Platanus hybrida) 2.18 Healthy Preserve C 1 2.18 0 15011 18 London plane tree(Platanus hybrida) 1.77 Healthy Preserve C 1 1.77 0 15012 18 London plane tree(Platanus hybrida) 1.77 healthy Preserve C 1 1.77 0 15013 16 London plane tree(Platanus hybrida) 1.40 Healthy Preserve C 1 1.40 0 15014 8 Sweetgum(Liquidambar styraciflua) 0.35 Roots show sings of girdling.(OK) Preserve B 1 0.35 0 15015 5 Sweetgum(Liquidambar styraciflua) 0.14 Roots show sings of girdling.(OK) Preserve B 1 0.14 0 15016 6 Sweetgum(Liquidambar styraciflua) 0.20 Roots show sings of girdling.(OK) Preserve B 1 0.20 0 15017 6 _ Callery pear(Pyrus calleryana) 0.20 Healthy Preserve C 1 0.20 0 tree inventory of Tigard Skate Park.xls 2 013 05/09/07 Basal Additional Survey (in.) Tree (sq.feet) Reason for Windthrow "Save/ Area "'Mitigation Reference# DBH Species Basal Area Condition/Comments Removal Ratin!* Remove Left Been topped in past,prune dead limhs 15018 34 Oregon white oak(Quercus garryana) 6.30 (OK) Preserve C 1 6.30 0 Totals 65.54 71 57.32 0 Total#of Existing Trees= 76 Total#of Trees to be Removed= 5 Total Existing Basal Area(Sq Ft)+ 65.54 Total Basal Area(Sq Ft)to be Remo 8.22 Total#of Trees To Be Retained= 71 Total Number of Trees to be Mitigat 0 Total Basal Area(Sq Ft)Retained= 57.32 Hazard Tree-These trees either pose an immediate danger to life and safety,are diseased or defective in a manner that threatens their continued viability,or will become a danger to life and safety due to disease of defects after the project is"built out". These trees do not require mitigation. "Windthrow Rating: A=High Risk B=Moderate Risk C=Low Risk **SAVE/REMOVE: 1=SAVE 0=REMOVE '""MITIGATION REQUIRED: 1=YES 0=NO Arborist Disclosure Statement: Arborists are tree specialists who use their education,knowledge,training,and experience to examine trees,recommend measures to enhance the health of trees,and attempt to reduce the risk of living near trees. The Client and Jurisdiction may choose to accept or disregard the recommendations of the arborist,or seek additional advice. Arborists cannot detect every condition that could possibly lead to the structural failure of a tree. Trees are living organisms that fail in ways we do not fully understand. Conditions are often hidden within trees and below ground. Arborists cannot guarantee that a tree will be healthy or safe under all circumstances,or for a specified period of time. Likewise,remedial treatments,like medicine,cannot be guaranteed. Trees can be managed,but they cannot be controlled. To live near trees is to accept some degree of risk. The only way to eliminate all risk associated with trees is to eliminate all trees. At the completion of construction,all trees must once again be reviewed to evaluate their hazard rating. Land clearing and removal of adjacent trees can expose previously unseen defects and otherwise healthy trees can be damaged during construction tree inventory of Tigard Skate Park.xis 3 of 3 05/09/07 • TREE HAZARD EVALUATION FORM All sections of this form must be fully completed by a certified arborist. Site/Address: /3 12-3 /1q /// HAZARD RATING: > Map/Location: "7-- ��'!;/'c� ©p + �� + = I / Owner: public )( private unknown other Failure + Size +Target=Hazard Date: --VQ/O 7Arborist: R Y K T LLEN ISA#: PN-5 94 8A Potential of part Rating Rating � Immediate action needed '�` Arborist's Signature: � � Needs further inspection Dead tree TREE CHARACTERISTICS Tree#: IO t6 Species: On LIE— -�/ r DBH: #of trunks: ' Height: Spread: Form: generally symmetric❑minor asymmetry ❑major asymmetry ❑stump sprout ❑stag-headed Crown Class: 2ominant ❑co-dominant ❑intermediate ❑suppressed Live crown ratio:% Age Class: ❑ young❑semi-mature F1'mature ❑over-mature/senescent Pruning History: ❑crown cleaned❑excessively thinned❑topped❑crown raised❑pollarded i-crown reduced❑flush cuts❑cabled/braced ❑none ❑multiple pruning events Approx.dates: L/,1 =- Special Value: ❑specimen❑heritage/historic❑wildlife❑unusual❑street tree❑screen❑shade❑indigenous❑protected by gov.agency TREE HEALTH Foliage Cover: IZormal ❑chronic ❑necrotic Epicormics? Y N Growth obstructions: Foliage Density: CYnormal ❑sparse Leaf size: 0-normal ❑small ❑stakes ❑wire/ties ❑signs Ocables Annual shoot growth: ❑ excellent ❑'Sverage ❑poor Twig Dieback? Y N l curb/pavement ❑guards Woundwood development: ❑�.6xcellent ❑average ❑poor ❑none ❑other Vigor class: ❑excellent ❑l4verage ❑fair ❑poor 11 Major pests/diseases: )o- s/4 b1Q 1} r6 Y-- rcJ'F SITE CONDITIONS / Site Character: ID residence 1.' mercial ❑industrial ❑park ❑open space ❑natural ❑woodland/forest Landscape type:, ❑parkway C�rzised bed ❑container ❑mound ❑lawn ❑shrub border ❑wind break Irrigation: Lit one ❑adequate ❑inadequate ❑excessive ❑trunk welded Recent site disturbance? Y NC/6 construction ❑soil di bance ❑grade change ❑line clearing ❑site clearing %dripline paved: 0% 10-25% 5-50%,• 50-75% 75-100% Pavement lifted? Y N •/.dripline w/fill soil: 0%; 10-25% Z0f 50-75% 75-100% %dripline grade lowered: 03/ 10-25% 25-50% 50-75% 75-100% Soil problems: ❑drainage ❑shallow ❑compacted ❑droughty ❑saline ❑alkaline ❑acidic ❑small volume ❑disease center ❑history of fail ❑clay ❑expansive ❑slope ? aspect: Obstructions: ❑lights ❑signage ❑line-d-site lew ❑overhead lines ❑underground utilities ❑traffic ❑adjacent veg. ❑ Exposure to wind: ❑single tree ❑below canopy Vibove canopy ❑recently exposed windward,canopy edge ❑area prone to windthrow Prevailing wind direction:./A--/ Occurrence of snow/ice storms ❑never eldom ❑regularly TARGET Use Under Tree: ta'building prking O vaffic ❑pedestrian IA-recreation ❑landscape ❑hardscape ❑small features 'CJ utility lines Can target be moved? Y (N Can use be restricted? Y Occupancy: ❑occasional use ❑intermittent use ❑frequent use 14,05()Stant use • TREE DEFECTS ROOT DEFECTS: Suspect root rot: Y N Mushroom/conk/bracket present: V N ID: Exposed roots: 0 severe 0 moderate 0 low Undermined: 0 severe 0 moderate 0 low Root pruned: Root area affected: % Buttress wounded: V N When: Restricted root area: 0 severe 0 moderate 0 low Potential for root failure: 0 severe 0 moderate 0 low LEAN: deg.From vertical 0 natural 0 unnatural 0 self-corrected Soil heaving: Y N Decay In plane of lean: Y N Roots broken: Y N Soil cracking: V N Compounding factors: Lean severity: 0 severe 0 moderate 0 low CROWN DEFECTS: Indicate presence of individual defects and rate their severity(s=severe,m=moderate,I=low) DEFECT ROOT CROWN TRUNK SCAFFOLDS BRANCHES Poor taper - Bow,sweep Codominants/forks Multiple attachments Included bark - Excessive end weight Cracks/splits Hangers Girdling Wounds/seam Decay Cavity - Conks/mushrooms/bracket Bleeding/sap flow r-y1 - Loose/cracked bark Nesting hold/bee hive Deadwood/stubs Borers/termites/ants i Cankers/galls/burls - Previous failure HAZARD RATING t/� Tree part most likely to fall: c' / VII 1 Failure potential:1-low;2-medium;3-high;4-severe Inspection period:_ annual biannual other_ Size of part: 1 -•=6"(15 cm); 2-6-18"(15.45 cm); Fai Potential+Sizq Part+Target Rating=Hazard Rating 3-18-30"(45-75 cm);4->30"(75 cm) * = r 1 Target rating: 1-occasional use;2-intermittent use; 3-frequent use; 4-constant use HAZARD ABATEMENT Prune: 0 remove defective part 0 reduce end weight 0 crown clean 0 thin 0 raise canopy 0 crown reduce 0 restru cture 0 shape Cable/Brace: Inspect further: 0 root crown Vfecay 0 aerial 415"onitor Remove tree: Y N Replace? Y N Move Target: Y N Other: Effect on adjacent trees: 0 none 0 evaluate Notification: 0 owner 0 manager 0 governing agency Date: COMMENTS d(%f /v 5/ ?C/ /o c a//.0,)i 13 G1 f'I. t I u !r6-el rc4 F i'`V-- •r t.v r� C G✓\ S/g c,c N r"--N . /7 i'.5 /f._e,e fs j1 f �� f 5 1h t43 s kief ;et/ frz. CZ Ire- c F.( it '/C5t 1/3 Of I LS SfYek kv,'rt( O /610.k/thy r�y tie 4 446c 1 t O f C+Y p r S r K4 vex,I G'r � yrCdr~ic 1,.1/4--4)Cl G, (-ewe a‘.. v ,,,,t, FS t c C c ( -CU t dl{ /' k 5 f-r _ /-.0 do 4c/-.v/ w he • • • ADOI11Q94 L TREE PRESERVATION NOTE5 TREE PRESERVATION NOTES ma pm mu• I AW C1NMU3 70 M...ED DE NESIMMOM TREE REMOVAL AND A %'EC 0111145 MEW�.O AMOR W 100(1 MM RAW•*l M MEC,IO oma v,re NR(�YA _• -..61W M VAM wows PM./10.!81'5.STORK NUM*WOLK 40.raw%.ow%OONC.I 01901E Plw.1 WE,31.651 Mf RATER ucnal Cl M WOE mu a MM uFSIMIm w 9,9r5 M,]AIG MD 41 IVIED w.rraD EAM9ML § 711:777271:171:11 T .�""" E RrtcMN1*�N,4 D MOR PROTECTION aNM6w Ra W6MOD 4P9a 9Mo WDEwMM 's HIM 9.15•Ima Owl cors,R[,gx ti, e:uzin:i ti C01fu RD •sa,nhiaauuil 3 aDRa aNTR 1EwN ID 9 P"- LEGEND ,�[aSOw,ED iW MOrtEna. • of...- 10 DE4E rW 77101/1 a O6NR.4(lz c PROTECT.LAMER. 43*R E 110.00 OM AM.IELRD w IME LAD 4 erica fa ..... ° ., ��I OM.CONTEMU5 THE MACH A,RE ROOM P1AM1 6 RawEd.M WIRMLEhR �._.., .•. S. BU $TREFT I. WM 14(114O.MM11FMMLr 169E PRECM TREE ERN MC M OVER .•.• _ Lou MD CAREWEY 9,010101*M PROW.ARA•45 PROTECTED IRS CO 7 9 Rc1ME0 w COMP NIM ME05 w A WPM a 411[5515¢0 RI0ES OR 1110 =ran 1111 �w 1135 W [MIRE•CATMS1 TREE RWi1ww0 N WAR 1N1ERR M AR6 VOW C M ORMK RCM] Of A ORE M 01� lwv I I 4! 1]�I-•NHS OYI �1ND e (' MOM TO PROTECT ROOTS[RR a.WQ cM6[D B!RMT EVFY[xr..In SULK MO NDNN I �t e -J \ 3. 141 PROD ElOR9AlION CR CO.CO C a E94M OR OMR rolwwur I34RCRD i 1133 mom IMO M BONERS Nal Nci / I -• 1 -.-1\l[nJ 3r, EMIML WIMNWS 0[fDUPR MF , RE AMMO w M91Q[R.DM.Rr[YLnRN A RD WON KIP �✓ 816..Al EWE u OR.ROOT MME w abMU SEMI N MOR Or TREES TO El 5 Mc WW1..nMI NoMM1r ml[.a x01 IMN 1.an.(P rry�N 1 \ * [IRON WAD.011 115 M3 5 INV R ROIR4 w ME 010(5 E PRINO Ff001 D Co M01EYD MS N ORDER w APOO M.ERON wa4ERE 04 OMDND(11.111 W R Ru/ED TO MINION IRON 111aGIII COMM.P.M h wi[MD 010 ip1,1114. PI.ASiiC IiESH 1FEE PROTECTION E 2 ,' I 0101E wxrw M MOW.MACRO N Pl.um M aR.tn WRIST Nm0611• ORE[R[YPYL/PR9ECi(11 PUM m PANSY RllE4 CCR'(ED ARBJ15i / / •• 11JZ [1051 611]/21X15 DECDIM IREE 1*R OF45ID MR FAO.w•IN9 09OME E a OtaMET 6 65D[O.11005 ccaRs 1051 FN-59141 1ROI MS MIMIC MA 10[51.1,LLC 4/ ; e 7 83031 0f M DORM Wu H WS.NiOIE�.rtOCl Pt I✓50 131 NSW 111]AR0011/1 Caf[MR5 1R(i0 9 R34MD ISI //7//'l 0. 1 T Wu WA MDi DE E5.50 OR REAM 61.M calm WM 7. I /�/d/:�J/�.4:: / IRE'S m 9 PRYRRO SAW M PROJECT/4.0115 MPMOWI. IN �.o% ] it30 DAM CVIMFIJIIS ME TO R RYpTJ IECESS N TO W OUT of COMM a W w ONE 041 a M IAF a M L .'.�. ©]e /'(`�\ MEE 51.05 Of M[4.1 w C SOLS PaCEM4O ER.i n 'wi wig ----- . SV�J// M 511014 a M TREE MP ION OENC[s MO e[RW9➢ID FMSUE M 1,g,{� - _ __ # 1150WSW6IRE TO R RO. 111£'551.01114. \jJ 1 ]. •M Cwu 4O.:16 TO I Mi4R.EO Mf 6 RAM 40 Ml IT cal0 903x1 tilt) ` _ '0. �}���a IZM m MECCA.a M ROOTS I ZONE.n 9MU a RR wasl.nM S z eo 1 -, -MO L�IIPJ• 3 M 1046 SIRL NU MWNL•IW M.SO MS NMM M OA. //�R 2 ROT MN K M X IRE w OE REIANRD■14.1 ME NAO..a M P14AC, 7.1/1/ /�,/ `. .ME MGM O romX TO 1113 v7OM E WOODS R 111 �:; �A.wwvwM. ME RRELYDN ma(R'E4:awAN) _'/. t D� M P01,MINL FOR MO ROAD D1111C(TO M 19911/1 SUR4E •� A 1. R C VA TOT '1 I0,ACES MITT M. OA41 St 1OLAT0 WM a YY ,\ I / 71 M x16' TOOT ZONE 0,MS ro 9 RiyEC. M IgpE[,mow wr IV// /L/.JII ORS RAM MST DfM6 9 MICE)MIEA M.TS OF MB 10 EL WTI(fD 4- • / \ M P.A3.0.MAWS Rw T.C.0 Nut*SM..?RNS aS - d 1•\ .QE�y,'0W` M C.K.Of ME ORES 90NIX 1�1e011 .,/f- t+ �- T�J .�♦•X MROPC9O LMDYwa 5 E1�D Sm�i 0072155 CICEAr OPER..901DE.0.crtfo PROTECTED A TO CM.MON E1.03 39D 4 3 ONSIRU iION ..... 1 04 5 PRC EN WA 0 Y TO EROSION 0 M&s 9 1E RE TO J PMFA 3 [*110.1 ERSO4 99-65.6 05 2 11 MO/1711 100 R 9 101 15 aI M NOAE,9l LOTS.RIME FAME INfR 41 FAME IP0215 Ott EROSEM VP' 'N4 ^C >G cam mow 9.R WARDED 71.5161 M LOC MOOR 14.]1 mo 1475 ®; e ._/// �r ., f / ` i I 9Ea13M RLRIG w WEN 925 9 USED 10 Awl*DAN4E 10 © y( © 1813 o[SGIMEO fw REMro1 191 `• +' ..I /' ///////1�' t..�^�.S'` - LL'�R MP.,... `•R:°I i. NpIFL[91 NIRCM ME WIBSIfMf MIX KE[PED UMW,tlR511Y PR1CiR5 ` !- -V',19011 - - // -._ / ..� _ t // iO4 '] �. [i.IRE.... :r WIE / i_im�-� z ,i_ima_ NI.Ew Nm(M1I MOM.SaE 6.uam wlx Mmrsl 771011 71//, /'/I/�V - - / y/ // X� i Eiml_-.. -'9 iL.1•Yt- P0a�+� --"1 EC1vAO01 N M IOP 71'•M Xl M M.65 Rat M e WA Woo 9M Al __ 1 ,' ,/ //• . r / 9 1..i1J9_^7 Tl IMuJll _0-0-0,••••••:?,: 1 M 0.011311 OF no'6 6�w M Mf. .'!.Mimi "i MI .7.4=0;∎. e J•RRRL. mL.�lT�'N•�^w �ml ].M WM'MOx SIWID E Oa[D'1Np/9DA1 OR MM A P.M WO A WO MM A !ems!.- -, Y-. yy m 1 E-�•^ • te 91Mti ImsEC vRAS.Mo ROOM sw - �I a .�'r ,y�•. ..•{I � 1 J.u R:w ..agE 3 R KW B!MD.ML ISIS 1•w..WILD e1 PAW M M EMOTION 1K ♦ `N"•- ��`� 1 I =I M -r °22 (oa(MM•wwa 1401 77770$x001).OM M CAROM WPU WA M •• _ _po RRLimlri-T� '].1 Ei --.'Z..+i AT no of M!wL MO ..1.MEO x05 MwRO M RO5 M 719115 M• - ( , ��ml�S ._ 9l -7=... ...'�.�.i (W,nwr i W1E1at • .. aP[MAIY NR IDNS M(Y Wl ODE 6 I .iml�T�. iLJY + Q /c.{+M�_= !gym■°�r��"T�''�'� u��l m - `� f.M wCAIX 6 f0 RAM Off a If 11EE 1100.w R N9A.EO•4L TN6 \. w ] I' 1111 -']�_^N H ._ 41 906 9ML 9 al!WALT N1111YNi 9FM6 01 A ROM W _�l L, R�..iCl u Z.u9 R •'��,/� �O�Ti T _■ EI NwIRt W1N1Y1 iwI�1RN�. ®1500.5 1\ l` aN I NO I • VLT Z_�m..I. a.am=- =.2 ^■i ^�j=rO.R[19NN[ MI=1Y t_i.,...,- ,.--r--31 ∎ fyRRr.r 1iN/M•a (608£0•raw N. -^ i�i9li=.-cam-L. i ut�"lw ■005010 nM9•wf•�a L.im9.-a!--Z--9 ul 1/ I�w 77/711.-.1 _o=CAW.tarI7i99 _*411 �i (4RR��j. i.amt...-�S_- .�_w 0101 \ /,\� 6 1 LjJ i:ii9ll..'�=J� .`N iMOr�f111 OR�~��l� 9CLIL r-3a F6T \/4001 60.1® ® e0T® BW�:./ 5_1.771....'-�-J'.�S=-N I`ni RiR�ll9 iSai iL->•1.7L 1M.._^•'-'^r-^1 INN Y 114N191NN919 106 N9 j *Ilirl AI�FBS 11•3611.12.4ft�YM4 KM.111rMn ](////// ,40K1B 111•19LL� fa{ =r IIILIEM NM 111.111 NIMK MIBIMM•MN N. w i.o. aMw 101(01141 6116NN0116 NNW. yALSi a RENSIONS: a(vEEwn • RAM1l:0 IMWPEY(MO • FORESTRY .119.8 R 9M MAIM 1801 - MMNMOLw.M °�-^ R~` AS NOTED TIGARD SKATE 338W mM.,1N010a In 19,0 c u]HEAM at,ARM W R[RMO3,CRT. . PFEPAPED FOR 11312 S 11111. - TREE PROTECTION PLAN 901 MEOW*.W R7,1D AMMO RfAN PARK PONE-.073)L75-8461 975.18 .400.9,0091.10. n;MD.CROCK 97773 TIGARD SHEET --._ I.1443)9]5-8469 e6..1y1L'..t 03 111. 47. 503-118-754) 1 1 OF i 503-694-7297 OF � �/ MEMORANDUM .WINTER bROOK To: Cheryl Caines and Kim McMillan,City of Tigard From: Ben Schonberger Date: May 10,2007 Re: Skatepark conditions summary(SDR 2006-00005) The table below summarizes the conditions of approval for the Tigard Skatepark land use decision(SDR 2006-00005),and the way Public Works proposes to meet them. This table addresses conditions 1 through 23,which are to be met prior to issuance of site permits. The other conditions(24 through 30)will be satisfied prior to final building inspection. Where supporting documentation is necessary, it is attached,with its relevant condition marked in the lower right hand corner of each document. Skatepark conditions summary (SDR 2006-00005) Cond. Issue Resolution No. 1 Show walkway through parking lot The walkway is shown on the"Landscape and Bike Parking Plan." 2 Provide landscape plan with planting An updated planting plan shows details.This e� details drawing is labeled"Landscape and Bike Parking Plan." 3 Replace any trees removed for sight A letter from transportation consultant distance purposes Lancaster Engineering addresses this issue.No trees will be removed. 4 Provide plan showing minimum parking A memo from Dennis Koellermeier,Public requirements are met Works Director,to Tom Coffee,Community Development Director addresses the parking issue. 5 Show bike rack details Bike rack details are shown on the"Landscape M�T and Bike Parking Plan"drawing. 6 Install tree protection fencing The contractor will install fencing according to the arborist's tree protection plan. See condition 7 for details. 7 Provide tree protection plan Randy Killen,a certified arborist,has prepared a tree protection plan. Winterbrook Planning 310 SW Fourth Avenue, Suite 1100 Portland, OR 97204 503.827.4422 • 503.827.4350 (fax) ben @winterbrookplanning.com 8 Submit tree protection reports every two The project arborist will submit regular weeks during construction progress reports as outlined.The reports will use the tree protection plan(see condition 7)as a baseline 9 Meet visual clearance standards if Hall When Hall is widened,the city will meet visual ∎ Blvd.is widened in future clearance standards. Confirmed via Cheryl Caines(Planning)voice mail to Brian Rager (Public Works)April 20,2007. 10 Public Facility Permit for any Burnham Kim McMillan(Engineering)has verbally N', driveway improvements confirmed to Brian Rager(Public Works)that this condition is satisfied. 11 PFI permit submittal requirements Kim McMillan(Engineering)has verbally A ` confirmed to Brian Rager(Public Works)that this condition is satisfied. 12 Submit additional information on sight A letter from transportation consultant distance for Hall entrance. Remove or Lancaster Engineering addresses this issue. No trim trees if necessary. trees will be removed. 13 Submit circulation and signage plan to A memo and map from Winterbrook Planning encourage use of Burnham driveway addresses this issue. 14 Explore shared access on Burnham The City is exploring shared access as part of the Burnham Street reconstruction project. Kim McMillan(Engineering)has verbally ✓ confirmed to Brian Rager(Public Works)that the city's current actions result in this condition being satisfied. 15 Apply for adjustment to Hall and An application for an adjustment to the spacing Burnham driveway spacing standards standards was submitted to Planning on April 10, 2007. Tigard land use case file VAR 2007- 00014 and VAR 2007-00015 16 Provide construction vehicle access and The cover sheet of the construction set shows parking plan.No use of required parking construction access and parking per the for other uses. requirements. 17 Convey Hall Blvd.right of way to Brian Rager(Public Works)delivered the ODOT donation deed for the Hall right of way to ODOT on May 9,2007. 18 Dedicate Burnham right of way to City Brian Rager(Public Works)delivered the dedication deed for the Burnham right of way to Engineering on May 9,2007. 19 Obtain ODOT permit for work in Hall ODOT is reviewing the city's permit request. right of way Sisul Engineering nrenared and submitted the Winterbrook Planning Page 2 permit request on May 8,2007. - 20 Provide final design plans and calcs for Sisul Engineering provided final design plans water quality vault and calcs to the city on May 8, 2007. 21 Contact ODOT to determine if drainage ODOT is reviewing the city's permit request. study is required Sisul Engineering prepared and submitted the permit request on May 8,2007. 22 ODOT drainage permit,if required ODOT is reviewing the city's permit request. Sisal Engineering prepared and submitted the permit request on May 8,2007. 23 Provide erosion control plan A"Construction Erosion and Sediment Control Plan" is provided on three sheets. • Winterbrook Planning Page 3 I..l\(_ tS I_I.R engineering May 8, 2007 Ben Schonberger Winterbrook Planning 310 SW 4th Avenue, Suite 1100 Portland, OR 97013 RE: Tigard Skate Park Addendum -Intersection Sight Distance Measurement f z F Dear Ben: •- .��., � :;�. ��. � �,.� �, . • This letter is written to offer further explanation of the sight distance at the'Hall Boule- vard access for the Tigard Skate Park. As documented in the October 2, 2006 letter from Lan- caster Engineering discussing intersection sight distance, the line of sight looking north from the Hall boulevard access is restricted by trees along the site frontage of Hall Boulevard. Based on the posted speed of 30 mph, the intersection sight distance standard is 335 feet. As documented in the October 2 letter, approximately 280 feet of intersection sight distance is available. The October 2 letter also goes into quite a bit of discussion regarding intersection sight distance and stopping sight distance. Essentially, intersection sight distance is an operational measure, intended to allow a side-street vehicle to enter the traffic stream with minimal interrup- tion to traffic flow. Stopping sight distance is a minimum requirement for safety,ensuring that a vehicle traveling on the major street will have adequate line of sight to see an obstacle in the road, recognize it as such, and come to a complete stop if necessary. An intersection that does not have intersection sight distance can still operate safely,provided that stopping sight distance is provided. In this case, there is not adequate intersection sight distance to the north from the Hall Boulevard access, although there is adequate stopping sight distance. As such, the access can operate safely. In the October 2 letter, it was mentioned that the line of sight is restricted by the street trees along the site frontage. City staff has inquired about the potential improvement to sight distance that could be realized if these trees were removed. The attached "Figure A" illustrates the current line of sight from the access as well as the line of sight that would be possible if the trees were removed. As the illustration shows, parked vehicles in the parking lot would be the next obstacle to the line of sight if the trees were re- moved. To achieve this line of sight, six trees would have to be removed and the intersection 321 SW 4th Avenue,Suite 400•Portland,OR 97204•Phone 503.248.0313•Fax 503.248.9251 1 (�49u414lbvlS grAd t le .. Ben Schonberger May 8,2007 Page2of3 sight distance would be improved by only 40 feet. This would yield a sight distance of ap- proximately 320 feet, which still does not meet the intersection sight distance standard. The photo below shows the line of sight looking to the north. Notice in the photo that the trees are fairly large and well maintained. Also notice that the tree trunks themselves are actually just a partial obstruction to sight distance. Limited visibility is available through the trees. tip , Iiiiii - i; 111 1 1 LIT '' 1.1111113;;;;141 IW ' . I I I Looking north along Hall Boulevard from Tigard City Hall access Ben Schonberger May 8, 2007 Page 3 of 3 The following facts regarding the access to Hall Boulevard are considered: • The improvement to the line of sight is only 40 feet with removal of the trees and the resulting sight distance is still not sufficient to meet intersection sight distance stan- dards. • The existing street trees are well established and offer a significant enhancement to the site frontage and to Hall Boulevard. • There is limited visibility through the trees in addition to the sight distance reported in this letter. • The subject driveway has been in place with this configuration for many years and presumably has been operating safely. • Adequate stopping sight distance is available and the access can continue to operate safely. • Skate Park traffic can be encouraged to use the Burnham Street driveway, which has adequate intersection sight distance. Based on the above considerations, it is recommended that the existing trees be retained, as the improvement to sight distance is not expected to outweigh the negative effects of remov- ing the trees. If you have any questions or would like any further information, please don't hesi- tate to call. Yours truly, Todd E. Mobley E, PTOE Principal p,cp PROF(c, �6 ,aG1NFF9 <4, Q �V 54853 G OREGON ‘.1 yg�2O0 0E. Mo '_ ff Irotvi EXPIRES: (Z1';+/7w$ I JI / / / / IIIIL ?e \ \ lk. \ POINT ONCOMING VEHICLE BECOMES VISIBLE F \ POTENTIAL UNOBSTRUCTED LINE OF SIGHT' WITH TREE REMOVAL (SIGHT DISTANCE s APPROX. 320') a CURRENT UNOBSTRUCTED 1 el — LINE OF SIGHT (SIGHT ie L— ��(�v��, ��(q'�� }err���,, 1 DISTANCE s APPROX. 280) e 't t.Y e 0 a I ° 1 > J e) 1 m I J � z I I 11 _Iill f i I I II LOCATION OF EXITING I DRNER'S EYE _ 1:_ .ti I * 1: T ' I Fl...) TT 1 --.: L _____1 LI, e(---5-73 7 1 1LSI I IN TIGARD SKATEPARK FIGURE P le Hall Bouelvard Access *� n0 AGE - Intersection Sight Distance Comparison scale • MEMORANDUM TIGARD TO: Tom Coffee FROM: Dennis Koellermeier RE: Skate Park, SDR2006-00005 DATE: April 20, 2007 Tom, based on conversations we had last week this memo is to address Condition of Approval No. 4, which states: "Prior to a site/building permit issuance the applicant shall provide a plan for review and approval that shows the minimum parking requirements are being met by providing an additional 17 parking spaces. Those spaces shall not be further than 500 feet from the primary site. (1'UC 18.765.030)." To satisfy that condition we propose the following. Niche lot Expansion:We will fast-track the expansion of this lot from it's existing configuration up to 30 spaces.This work will most likely be done prior to the actual construction of the skate park commences.This work is shown on our application. Police Parking (Fleet): As you recall we need to maintain 64 spaces for fleet.This number represents a scenario where all fleet vehicles are parked at the same time all as all other uses in the City Hall/Permit Ctr. are also maxed out. I have confirmed with the Chief that due to their shift design,which overlaps the swing shift and graveyard change periods,only at the am shift change does the potential exist.Thus, the only time we really need to have all these spaces is potentially in the early am.To that end I am proposing that we enact a temporary restriction to not allow outside groups to reserve the town hall room prior to 9AM from the start of our project until the library lot is completed. In addition,when we were going through land use the timing of the expansion of the parking lot at the Library was in question. Construction of this project will allow the removal of the condition to reserve 16 spaces at the City Hall lot as overflow parking for the Library. We can know report that the Library project is out to bid,with bid opening scheduled for May 3`d. Thus the decision body can have a high level of confidence that this project,and it's 24 additional parking spaces,will be a reality. Cowl -(ova WINTLK MEMORANDUM 5ROOK To: Cheryl Caines, Tigard Planning From: Ben Schonberger Date: May 9,2007 Re: Circulation and signage plan This plan addresses condition of approval 13 of SDR2006-00005,which states,"the applicant shall submit a traffic circulation and signage plan that encourages skatepark traffic to use the Burnham Street access." The primary method for directing vehicles to use the Burnham Street entrance is the design of the skatepark entrance. The only entrance into the skatepark is on its north side,adjacent to the Niche lot. The shortest, least circuitous route from a vehicle to the park is to enter in the Burnham driveway,park in the Niche lot, and walk into the skatepark.The design of the facility itself encourages access from the Burnham driveway. If,on a first visit to the City Hall complex,people park in other lots,their behavior will be largely self-correcting. Parking elsewhere requires park users to walk around the skatepark and through the Niche lot to get in. Because drivers park as near to their desired destination as possible,these people will certainly park in the Niche lot on subsequent visits. In addition,a directional sign indicating the location of skatepark parking will be installed at a key location as shown on the attached plan to direct first-time users. This sign will be located at a decision-point location where a user who has mistakenly entered the site from the main Hall Boulevard entrance might choose to go into the City Hall North lot. This directional sign does not require a sign permit per 18.780.060(A)(7). The proposed sign meets the two standards under(B)because it will be constructed on city hall property,and no other directional sign will be within 30 feet of it. Finally,the city is evaluating a comprehensive change to signage for the city hall complex. This may involve a new monument sign on Hall Boulevard that directs users to the multiple uses on the civic center complex: police station,permit center,city hall,and skatepark. The location of this sign,and how many signs there will be, has not yet been determined. A sign permit, separate from this land use process,will be requested from Tigard Planning when this decision is made. Winterbrook Planning 310 SW Fourth Avenue, Suite 1100 Portland, OR 97204 503.827.4422 • 503.827.4350 (fax) ben @winterbrookplanning.com Gov\d i-I log, 13 SW BURNHAM STREET 1 -r--., r- _._._ ).1,14 -TTTTTT1Tr Niche / Skatepork Lot vhI , "1:1% sk k ........... I . r 1 ARINI. lillf 11 1 CITY C �� ' HALL �� 4.,. ■;. ANNEX k I'' Mb:. ', '�` C Poln+5 I I {NICHE} �BKE I L I Ti 'ii I l rt +!...■•••. •:•e., -KA�AAK ENTRIES y oil North Lot I A; : ''"'- 'r-`� $i C Arab. PROPOSED �- -- SKATEPARK 1:11� -- .., Note: See 9rotep.t Please hr wee drdne : •C __ ,,, and drain fine beaten.within the etoteport ____; ,_ _ i AM. lI( -- �! i Propwed Starrnwter 1• .-_I ;1®l r`I _-award Wt.VI n . y ..Mai.1l•e t. * EM.M1i-•.Q�[eln y/ I [eri-r+ ,.• [art-IKl IP TC 1 X44.9 V ��_ Valley Cutter Shp• ;ii•.t• :: ••• Propane Drain Line 1111 11111111111 ■ ..TNC SOMALI( {� CO �`#__tiY•-w tit tit %l *--�f_ 1t Ct *tit-_ fit____ --J • J • , Figure 1.Skatepark circulation and signage plan. (4-i--3:ill � ri Lotot Reh •C nt w d rtv ohit 1 c to it% d i tq 4 i r " 51cfrkpenek p Cov\d(-bov) 13 V d 'w 'w Wt ] P % ■ _ NO" 391•00. V' -we 4 iliC4(;) . 22.10111f _ VICINITY MAP: LOCATION MAP: PROJECT TEAM: I\ \ \ 1 OWNER: CITY OF I ED CI — C AUTHORIZED CITY STAFF: \ SW BURNHAM STREET \ 1••4 - C DANIEL PLAZA 13125 S.W.HALL BLVD. M W TIGARD,OR 97223 ;T4 I+M (503)639-4171 ® ®1 1 m ITTTI I ® \ STAGING AREA I v I I I I I (�•� O cin PROJECT MANAGER: TROY MEARS (Z"+ !� a SR DESIGN LLC I _ CONSTRUCTION LIMIT A � 6196 S.W.HALL BLVD. I (TEMPORARY CONST.FENCE) 1� SUITE 232 BEAVERTON,OR 97008 1 I a \ W W O (`J (503)469-1213 , ° _ DRAWING INDEX: [—I t, ^ DESIGN CONTRACTOR: -- 8 ®, b ® ® I SHEET TITLE SHEET NUMBER MARK scorn I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I e U I I I I ' �i • , DREAMLAND SKATEPARKS,L.L.C. ® COVER SHEET 1 960 SE HWY 101 _ LYNCH TYPE CB TO BE DETAIL SHEET 2 LINCOLN CITY,OR 97239 e (503)577-5929 11„ V���. — �_ e I REMOVED AND RELOCATED 7 ��•••�•� '" .n� Q TO PARKING LOT AS SHOWN CONCRETE DETAILS 3 0 r € ktay•------;Ion � ._.., m ON SHEET 5 OF 5. _ rr 1 1 1 I I I I �I IIII A �� PI k k 49 i - = CROSS SECTION DETAILS 4 i\ I 1 AO I L ELEVATION AND DRAINAGE 5 o m H Ill ' I _ __ _II II c.i :r_.. . I G • e O GENERAL NOTES; e�---..., .. I. BLEND CUT AND FILL SLOPES TO CONFORM TO THE ADJACENT NATURAL GROUND. ittillhi o \ o 2. ANY DISCREPANCY IN DIMENSIONS SHALL HE BROUGHT TO THE ATTENTION OF M —rI , , 1111 n x THE OWNER'S REPRESENTATIVE PRIOR TO THE COMMENCEMENT OF WORK, •�l H► .�T( ,� �� c c�r.� 3. ADVISE THE OWNER'S REPRESENTATIVE OF ANY CONFLICTS OR DISCREPANCIES 5 • ° (FIVE)WORKING DAYS PRIOR TO STARTING WORK. �.r. • ::wu ONO.•e•c 4. STAGING AREA ARE TO BE WITHIN THE DESIGNATED CONSTRUCTION LIMITS.IF THE CONTRACTOR REQUIRES ADDITIONAL AREA,HE SHALL SUBMIT A WRITTEN N IR REQUEST TO THE OWNER'S REPRESENTATIVE.ITI g E I 5. VERIFY ALL SITE CONDITIONS BY SITE VISIT PRIOR TO BID OPENING, ^ c o id o 7 7. EROSION CONTROL MEASURES ARE TO BE IN PLACE AND MAINTAINED AT ALL O_ N 0 h TTIMES. O N O 3 MAINTAINED 8. VERIFY LOCATION OF ALL UTILITIES PRIOR TO COMMENCEMENT OF WORK. N .1 9. OREGON LAW REQUIRES THE CONTRACTOR TO FOLLOW RULES ADOPTED BY THE S a . OREGON UTILITIES NOTIFICATION CENTER.THOSE RULES ARE SET FORTH IN OAR Al z c y 952-001-0010 THROUGH OAR 952-001-0090.COPIES OF THEM MAY BE OBTAINED BY s CALLING THE CENTER AT(503)232-1987. oo ' .Fe c 1 10. DRAINAGE BY CITY OF TIGARD PUBLIC WORKS AS SHOWN ON PAGES OF 5. Shoot Number 11. LANDSCAPING DONE BY CITY OF TIGARD. 12.PERMANENT FENCING DONE BY CONTRACTOR y �i s ,. SCALE No SCALE 100%CONSTRUCTION SET 1 OF 5 CoIv01I1-i0v) IG City of Tigard 1312.5 SW Hall Blvd . Tigard OR 97223 Phone(503)639-4171 Fax; (503)684-7298 TIGARD Letter of Transmittal Date 5/9/07 Transmitted By: Project: Tigard Skate Park ❑ Mail File No. El Will Call To: Sam Hunaidi, Asst District Manager ® Other Cr,1 !ILA+c / Address: ODOT District 2A ;-.00 We are Sending you.. El Drawings ❑ Prints ® For Approval ❑ Specifications [] Plans ❑ As Requested El Copy of Letter [] Samples ❑ For Your Use ❑ Change Order ® Other El Comment #of Copies Deactiptioa • I Donation Deed for Hall Boulevard ROW 1 Level 1 ESA_nredared by AMEC Items Are... ® Attached ❑ Under Separate Cover via Remarks: From: Rager �`, • • Cond 11-,a v, 1`7 2 'd TOb281LCOS xauud rid p.Je2T1 60 :9T L002 60 ReW RETURN RECORDED DOCUMENT TO: V44.1A1 . ,k � CITY HALL RECORDS DEPARTMENT, CITY OF TIGARD ,,\ , uA _ - 13125 SW Hill Blvd. t • Tigard,OR 97223 ? CORPORATION 6\ °1 d1 File No. 5 Z,cyoc� -aocn 2,-1,0 r— DEDICATION DEED FOR ROAD OR STREET PURPOSES Space above reserved for Washington County Recording information i�t� T - Co•lc it; _ 4R'At'Tat-~) does hereby dedicate to the public a perpetual .. t-of-way for street,road, and utility purposes on, over, across,under,along,and within the following described real properties in Washington County,Oregon: Attached Exhibit"A" To have and to hold the above-described and dedicated rights unto the public forever for uses and purposes hereinabove stated. The grantors hereby covenant that they are the owner in fee simple and the property is free of all liens and encumbrances,they have good and legal right to grant their right above-described,and they will pay all taxes and assessments due and owing on the property. The true consideration for this conveyance is$0.00. However,the actual consideration consists of or includes other property or value given or promised which is the whole consideration. IN WITNESS WHEREOF,I hereunto set my hand on this day of ,20 . 042'(/f/ f , y' . Name of Corporation Signature A 4f1bL Address Title Signature Tax Statement Mailing Address(febfferenrfrom above) Title STATE OF OREGON ) )ss. County of Washington ) This instrument was acknowledged before in on (date)by by: 1. (nlime(s)of person(s))as At—. "a..,, P7)t ' I % (type of authority, e.g., officer, trustee, etc.) of 0t V ,P (name If party o(21lclt atf of whom instrument was executed). OFFICIAL D WtlE l ^�CATHERE D WHELEY �•J NOTARY PUBUC.OREQON 's Signature f t COMMISSION NO.371142 My Commission Expires: e 4 (07 . ., a1MiSSION EXPIRES AUG.04,2007 Accepted on behalf of the City of Tigard this day of ,20 . µ City Engineer C or)ofil-nor, I'Z E 'd TOt' 8TLEOS xauud rid P.Je2ii 60 :9T L002 60 ReW • May 3, 2007 Sam H. Hunaidi ODOT- District 2A 6000 SW Raab Rd. Portland, OR 97221 Dear Sam, SUBJECT: CITY OF TIGARD COMMUNITY SKATE PARK. (SGL 06-095A) Enclosed with this letter are items for proposed Storm Drain improvements for a new Community Skate Park for the City of Tigard. Recently, the City of Tigard has approved the Skate Park through the Land Use process, and we are currently in the Design Phase of the project. As part of the Conditions of Approval granted by the City, we will need to obtain the appropriate permits and approvals from the Oregon Department of Transportation for the storm water removal of the site. It is important to point out that the location of the proposed skate park is within the existing parking lot area currently located at the site of Tigard City Hall, on SW Hall Blvd., Washington County. The existing impervious area of the parking area will be removed so the skate park surface can be installed. No new impervious area is being proposed, and we anticipate that the overall storm water runoff flow generated from the project site will be equal to the current flow going to the existing storm system in SW Hall Blvd. The proposed storm sewer system includes the construction of area drains within the park, and a catchbasin to capture the existing parking area runoff to the west of the park. All water from the project site will be conveyed through a "Contech Stormwater Solutions" filter manhole system before being released to the existing storm system, by way of connection to the existing catch basin inlet. If you have any questions regarding the proposal, please feel free to contact us at any time. Sincerely, Curt Pellatz Sisul Engineering COhGt � 16 V\9 9 -22 , , ` I` ` T I 1 li f i 1 `♦ j 1 all I t, 1 r` 11 i 1 • i1 111 l is 111 111 I s h ♦(—.---••-N-•\-‘♦'iiIAIV l'l'Vik r 1 li 1.t 4_I., 11 11'11 1 — ♦ ♦♦`♦ I % 11111 I I 11u i 1 .1 1 A' „tit 1 A�° ,� !I 1 4 \ If _!` ittc t 3 t 1 . I - 1 11 ♦` , l tfi , „,., , ,V -,, I ,., , Q _ _ ! = 11 1 { : ate I 1 i, I 1t I ) y I 1 MMEI�I W 91•LMI A 1 0 ( ,--, --___ _ ----.......- .. sr fit` •-.0" •Y• /� .. %ia�.—.—.— -•—• ._. • , I Pi __._._ .. •.,.................4.„..., .. ,...„......„.„.,...7.„, •„,,....,,,...,-„;..,..4:4•0--•-•-.-. ._.—.—•—•—•—•----- / ;pm ip � S!■■1 iff i I M s 1 W ) I -1 ;'' !I ' s I li I I 1 I1 — __— ``, 0 SW HALL RFD. 0 'T r 7Y•13.-. �' ' '"` ,_ ,A 3i♦`':? r'.• y . , t r p1., y , sa /''� f ti f \1• k •—• Y � rfa rifpl 1 i;ii ° 1- ! 'f• II goo 1. Ir 1 •i: Ill fl F--1 ° ■ () J . ' . . —. .''.q..'-:f: . - _:-').- . CI 1�t 1 TIGARD SKATE PARK i 1 Stormwater Drain Plan Gay OF ncARO • s r rk F ir L__ .* 0111 w 1�ta P I.•I si, I P P f 1+ N 6,:: P .4PP f 3PPr 11101 I�'1 I Iilift'ffllljW!i!llllø ,Yp t 3Y4r " F$ 1a 11 Riftl ... iiiI li 11 1 1 II o o iii ilium Hu Li -;= r i . i ilia Ii: q I it: 9 •§' &3ig @@fi Y i Y q 9 ig $ sjØIj l � In 1 3 1a 11 91 1 1 1%5 a• a F q 111 sf a S a ils 11 QI I< " i 4 I1 ? }g 9� �� 4 Y a ; _ ii . 5 a g sue°" c L " i ! ii i Ill 1 '� I ! aill i� & k ��i �+ . g , ��i s % i t 1 sl � 'e ° � in n' I i,^0 liw^. $.•j 4 I I��■ a k,:,�-�. . j\�j\�y\" ee,,,, t a :a:c�ron Sd� r 1411-1/ lit qi „ I, .. . 1 1 e4y,e e I 0 IIit1!! h 1.1-If lii ! I .;e i 11 11 411 -r-lk 1. i i JIM —\\__MT Oil 00frei I „FA, •j .� � i ,m 1" ' o , 'f, _ 1 �11 IB ! d 1,s. p , r iI � aI I , 1 I s ° Oki ig 1 . a f; " ,„ , ,� �.?' . aliE , i1, 9 lm a p is, ...i i . , ,1„ , ,,„ �' ' ' : � E ! ,�i� ail 1 •� I to 1 d ° i1i6i e I/6 I P i$ a TIGARD SKATE PARK' 1i q - iN a• P '"""��°" Details and Notes 11:4 1.,.� — CITY OF 7IGAR0 Cheryl Caines-construction staging ondition 16 Page 1 From: "Ben Schonberger" <Ben @winterbrookplanning.com> To: "Cheryl Caines" <CHERYLC @tigard-or.gov> Date: 5/15/2007 4:44:12 PM Subject: construction staging--condition 16 Cheryl, I talked with Troy about space for construction staging. I should have explained our calculations better with a memo or something. Here is an attempt. First, and obviously, skatepark construction will occupy the space of its footprint. Although this land is now used for parking, it will be helpful for people to start thinking of this real estate as skatepark. In addition, we agreed at our big meeting that construction crews could use the quantity of spaces required for skatepark-generated vehicles. The reasoning behind this is that vehicle demand for required parking spaces will not materialize until after the facility opens. In the short term, spaces already reserved for skatepark demand should be available to construction vehicles and materials. In the short run, the demand is from construction vehicles; when the facility is operational, the demand is from skatepark user vehicles. The quantity assigned to skatepark demand is 27 spaces. (See page 14 of your decision.) According to the calculations we agreed on after the meeting (see your March 15 e-mail to me), we are 11 spaces short of the requirement for the whole civic center complex. 27 minus 11 leaves us with 16 spaces available for construction purposes. We agreed that we could erase this deficit by reducing fleet vehicle load on the site, which is mostly due to police vehicles. (Again, our proposed solution was okayed in your March 15 e-mail.) The solution to condition 4 addresses this. Tom and Dennis and the police chief agreed that temporarily restricting early-morning use of the Town Hall room (pre-9 am) would reduce fleet vehicle conflicts, and eliminate the problem. Moreover, when the Library lot expansion is complete next spring, 16 spaces will open up for general use, and the issue is moot. Therefore, the 11 space deficit is erased, and the number of available spaces for skatepark construction is back up to 27. The drawing I submitted last week shows 24 spaces used for construction staging. This is less than the 27 allowed, and therefore this condition is met. Does that all make sense? I will work on the other conditions Troy mentioned needed some work. Thank you, and call or e-mail me with any issues. Ben Schonberger Winterbrook Planning CC: <troym @srdllc.com>, "Daniel Plaza" <Daniel @tigard-or.gov> Cheryl Caines - sk8 park conditions jp Roo - top 05 Page 11 From: Daniel Plaza To: Cheryl Caines Date: 5/16/2007 11:58:03 AM Subject: sk8 park conditions Cheryl, To the best of my understanding at this time it appears to me that all that remains to be completed on the pertinent conditions are 1) ODOT permit 2) Condition 13 (show entry sign at Burnham driveway) 3) Condition 16 (finalize number of spaces needed for staging area - somewhere between 11 and 24 spaces) 4) Condition 23 (show erosion control for 2 inlets) 5) Condition 15 (Burnham and Hall driveways - Dennis and Tom are talking about this condition being met before occupancy rather than before a permit is issued) How is my understanding? good, bad, ugly? Also, Dennis has told me that he is going to issue a notice to proceed for June 12, 2007. Demolition will begin the week of June 4, 2007. Thanks Dan Plaza Parks and Facilities Manager City of Tigard 503 718 2590 daniel@tigard-or.gov CURRENT STATUS UPDATED # DESC1tIPTION STATUS* DA "" BY DATE J/ BY Hall Boulevard. < „ SD P 020 6,-5 22 OBTAIN ODOT DRAINAGE PERMIT M 6/12/2007 KSM 6/12/2007 KSM 22. ODOT drainage Permit is required for connection to state highway drainage facilities. 23 EROSION CONTROL PLAN M 5/31/2007 KSM 5/31/2007 KSM 23. An erosion control plan shall be provided as part of the Site Permit drawings. The plan shall conform to the"Erosion Prevention and Sediment Control Design and Planning Manual,February 2003 edition." 24 AMEND TMC TO PROHIBIT ALCOHOL M 7/27/2007 CAC 7/27/2007 CAC 24. The applicant/owner shall amend the Tigard Municipal code(7.52.100)to prohibit the possession,control or consumption of alcoholic beverages in Tigard Skate Park. 25 OBTAIN NECESSARY SIGN PERMITS M 9/13/2007 CAC 9/13/2007 MSB 25. A separate sign permit will be required for all tenant signage prior to installation. ✓ 26 TREES OVER 12"DEED RESTRICTION M 12/26/2007 CAC 12/26/2007 PLL 26. The applicant/owner shall record a deed restriction to the effect that any existing tree greater than 12"diameter may be removed only if the tree dies or is hazardous according to a certified arborist. The deed restriction may be removed or will be considered invalid if a tree preserved in accordance with this decision should either die or be removed as a hazardous tree. 27 COMPLETE ALL WORK IN ROW M 10/3/2007 KSM 10/3/2007 KSM 27. Prior to a final inspection,the applicant shall complete any work in the public right-of-way and obtain approval from ODOT and the City of Tigard Engineering Department. 28 PAY FEE IN LIEU OF UG UTILITIES M 8/17/2007 KSM 8/17/2007 KSM 28. If the applicant proposes to provide lighting or other electrical services to the skate park they shall pay the fee in-lieu of under grounding. The fee shall be calculated by the frontage of the site that is parallel to the utility lines and will be$35.00 per lineal foot. 29 AGREEMENT WITH STORMWATER MANAGE M 8/23/2007 KSM 8/23/2007 KSM 29. Prior to a final inspection,the applicant shall demonstrate that they have entered into a maintenance agreement with Stormwater Management,or another company that demonstrates they can meet the maintenance requirements of the manufacturer,for the proposed onsite storm water treatment facility. 30 FINAL SIGHT DISTANCE CERT M 10/2/2007 KSM 10/2/2007 KSM 30. Prior to final inspection,the applicant's engineer shall submit final sight distance certification for both driveways. Condition Status Index: M=Met N=Not Met Ping-CaseConditions.rpt Page 3 of 3 Washington County,Oregon 2007-117243 1 u0 v10:33:32 AM D IR. Cnt=1 Stn=8 C PFEIFER • 515.00 55.00$11.00-Total=$31.00 WHEN RECORDED,MAIL TO: City of Tigard 13125 S.W.Hall Blvd. 01184765200701172430030039 I,Richard HobemicMt,Director of Assessment and -0,441 Tigard,Oregon 97223 Taxation and Ex-Officio County Clerk for Washington County,Oregon,do hereby certify that the within °{ `�•�''' Instrument of writing was received and recorded in the 7: ! MAIL TAX STATEMENTS TO: book of records of said cou �ry City of Tigard Richard HobemicM,DlreMori ofAssasame r ?�:•'_, 13125 S.W.Hall Blvd. Taxation,Ex-Officlo County Clerk Tigard,Oregon 97223 SDkpUai X10 RESTRICTIVE COVENANT DEED RESTRICTION THIS DECLARATION OF LAND USE DEED RESTRICTION("DEED RESTRICTION"), is dated as of OC1/2 61i 2'41 242p 7 , 2007, by the City of Tigard ("DECLARANT"). RECITALS WHEREAS, Declarant is the owner of the real property known as the Skate Park, and described in Exhibit A attached hereto and by this reference incorporated herein as the "Property"; and WHEREAS, the Declarant has dedicated used of the Property as a Skate Park; and WHEREAS, the Declarant desires that the trees on the Park Property be protected as consistent with City of Tigard policies on protection and management of trees in the City of Tigard; NOW THEREFORE, the Declarant declares that any existing tree greater than 12" (twelve inches) in diameter may be removed only if the tree dies or is hazardous according to a certified arborist. The deed restriction may be removed or will be considered invalid if a tree preserved in accordance with this decision should either die or be removed as a hazardous tree. IN T NE SS WII E CF, cd being Der..- t undersi thjs In the t m ntth,s 2 day herein} 2007 has executed CITY Washington e RD BY' . . Oregon r / Name /t ... and ile: �,,p, . STATE OP This of Iii ) ashi ) � ins�'menr tvac si A. /�,� ,�d before� on oale Si: J 4 �•_�l (rig e c , ,zo■ My C of ia!Officer Tigar o, C Co d W hinb'to 1 A- o ss�On Expires °nh:Or �S5F( �7 eb'on. �'�'+k OFF totals t . keipt. –1 No, ENGl sOARP pug y j (c < —C.� SN p ON �` ti�� ,_.E R ` i � (�� ����.�, (seal) EXHIBIT A Legal Description of Skate Park Parcel A tract of land located in the East one-half of Section 2 Township 2 South,Range 1 West, Willamette Meridian, City of Tigard, Washington County,Oregon,being a portion of the land described to the city of Tigard in Document Number 87053938 of the Washington County Deed Records described as follows: Beginning at the Northwest corner of the land described in Document Number 87053938 of the Washington County Deed Records; thence S 2° 15'07" W a distance of 162.00 feet; thence S 89° 10' 54" E a distance of 244.19 to the westerly right-of-way of SW Hall Blvd.; thence N 1°44' 13" E, along said right-of-way,a distance of 107.37 feet to a point of curve of a curve to the left; thence along said curve to the left with a radius of 188.00,a central angle of 16°50'33", (a chord which bears N 6°41'04" W 55.07 feet) and a length of 55.26 feet; thence N,89° 10'54" W a distance of 234.67 feet to the point of beginning. Containing 39283 square feet. AKS eTools Transmittal S p Leo �' cD� Page 1 of 1 ` AKS ENGINEERING & FORESTRY, LLC LETTER IDF T 60NSMITTAL AK 13910 SW Galbreath Drive, Suite 100 Offices Located In: Sherwood, OR 97140 Sherwood, OR www.aks-eng.com Redmond, OR Vancouver,WA Phone: 503-925-8799 Fax: 503-925-8969 To:City of Tigard DATE: 5/23/2007 JOB NO.: 1802 Attn: Cheryl Caines RE: Tigard Parks Skate Park 13125 SW Hall Blvd. Tigard, OR 97223 Billing # 1802, 21004, 30144 From:Randy Killen WE ARE SENDING YOU THE FOLLOWING: COPIES _ DATE NO. _ DESCRIPTION 1 5/23/2007 TREE PROTECTION PLAN FOR TIGARD SKATE PARK 1 5/23/2007 TREE REPORT FOR TIGARD SKATE PARK Li For Approval J Approved as submitted Li Resubmit copies for approval ❑ For your use ❑Approved as noted ❑ Submit copies for distribution © As requested ❑ Returned for corrections ❑ Return corrected prints ❑ For review and comment❑ ❑ FOR BIDS DUE ❑ PRINTS RETURNED AFTER LOAN TO US Remarks: If you have any questions, please call. Copy To:File SIGNED: Randy Killen Ver 1.0-4/2/2006 RECEIVED PLANNING MAY 2 4 2007 CITY OF TIGARD http://192.168.1.117/etools/transmittal/print.asp?ID=3601 5/23/2007 SW BURNHAM STREL i „`tG`Z;E'R4o GRADING,STREET,&EROSION&SEDIMENT CONSTRUCTION NOTES: t- 1 I CCCJJJ OREGON I I I 1.SEED USED FOR TEMPORARY OR PERMANENT SEEDING SHALL BE COMPOSED OF ONE OF THE FOLLOWING MIXTURES, tS1 1 I UNLESS OTHERWISE AUTHORIZED: �q A t 1 rdl {y 1 e ;�yPy� I 1 A.DWARF GRASS MIX(MIN.100lB/AC)1.DWARF PERENNIAL.RYEGREASS 00%),CREEPING RED FESCUE(20%). pE A� ldlllTr LLLll3 {�.7 1 ; B.STANDARD HEIGHT GRASS MIX(MIN.100LB/AC)t ANNUAL RYEGRASS(40%),2-TURF-TYPE FESCUE(00%) / �LL�llliii I I y�y 2.SLOPE TO RECEIVE TEMPORARY OR PERMANENT SEEDING SHALL HAVE THE SURFACE ROUGHENED BY MEANS OF _ l L"1 TRACK-WALKING OR THE USE Of OTHER APPROVED IMPLEMENTS.SURFACE ROUGHENING IMPROVES SEED BEDDING AND REDUCES I I 11LNUU--- RUN OFF VELOCITY. ff I ~ I 1 T 1 f \ I I 3.LONG TERM SLOPE STABILIZATION MEASURES SHALL INCLUDE THE ESTABLISHMENT OF PERMANENT VETATTVE COVER VIA / '--� T I SEEDING WITH APPROVED MU(AND APpLN:ATKIN RATE. / 11 l � T 4.TEMPORARY SLOPE STABILISATION MEASURES SMALL INCLUDE:COVERING EXPOSED SOIL WITH PLASTIC SHEETING, Z W Niche / Skatepark Lot STRAW MULCXI/G,WOOD CHIPS,OR OTHER APPROVED MEASURES. tT 5.STOCKPILED SOIL OR STRIPPINGS SHALL BE PLACED IN A STABLE LOCATION AND CONFIGURATION.DURING'VET WEATHER' O U P PERIODS,STOCKPILES SHALL BE COVERED WITH PLACTIC SHEETING OR STRAW MULCH.SEDIMENT FENCE IS REQUIRED AROUND THE PERIMETER OF THE STOCKPILE. CI 5 o u S.EXPOSED CUT OR FILL AREAS SHALL BE STABILIZED THROUGH THE USE OF TEMPORARY SEEDING AND MULCHING,EROSION ` = a r / ��� CONTROL BLANKETS,OR MATS,MID-SLOPE SEDIMENT FENCES OR WATTLES,OR OTHER APPROPRIATE MEASURES.SLOPES U a / I •••••••• 1 EXCEEDING 25%MAY REQUIRE ADDITIONAL EROSION CONTROL MEASURES. Q / �•IL"•�' .'sIrlr• �������� _c. 7.AREAS SUBJECT TO WIND EROSION SHALL USE APPROPRIATE DUST CONTROL MEASURES INCLUDING THE APPLICATION OF A W yl•� iv" •••., •�• -y1� FINE SPRAY OF WATER,PLASTIC SHEETING,STRAW MULCHING,OR OTHER APPROVED MEASURES. 0 0 Q i fC ' S.CONSTRUCTION ENTRANCES SHALL BE INSTALLED AT THE BEGINNING OF CONSTRUCTION AND MAINTAINED FOR THE DURATION U �. c OF THE PROJECT. ADDITIONAL MEASURES INCLUDING,BUT NOT LIMITED TO TIRE WASHES,STREET SWEEPING,AND VACUUMING r n O � I \ MAY BE REQUIRED TO INSURE THAT ALL PAVED AREAS ARE KEPT CLEAN FOR THE DURATION OF THE PROJECT. Z V I Z 5 iI `1 d 9.ACTIVE INLETS TO STORM WATER SYSTEMS SHALL BE PROTECTED THROUGH THE USE OF APPROVED INLET PROTECTION I V MEASURES. ALL INLET PROTECTION MEASURES ARE TO BE REGULARLY INSPECTED AND MAINTAINED AS NEEDED. < f CITY I V C 10.SATURATED MATERIALS THAT ARE HAULED OFFSITE MUST BE TRANSPORTED IN WATER-T G TRUCKS TO ELIMINATE SPILLAGE C 1 OF SEDIMENT AND SEDIMENT-LADEN WATER. HALL 4 Z 11.AN AREA SHALL BE PROVIDED FOR THE WASHING OUT OF CONTRETE TRUCKS IN A LOCATION THAT DOES NOT PROVIDE RUNOFF THAT CAN ENTER THE STORM WATER SYSTEM.IF THE CONCRETE WASH-OUT AREA CAN NOT BE CONSTRUCTED GREATER THAN 50' ANNEX I /•••�• n d FROM ANY DISCHARGE POINT SECONDARY MEASURES SUCH AS BERMS OR TEMPORARY SETTLING PITS MAY BE REQUIRED IHE ►�.=♦=.� {d1 WASH-OUT SHALL BE LOCATEAD WITHIN SIX FEET OF TRUCK ACCESS AND BE CLEANED WHEN IT REACHES 50%OF THE CAPACITY.• (NICHE) A • �tf 12.SWEEPINGS FROM EXPOSED AGGREGATE CONCRETE SHALL NOT BE TRANSFERRED TO THE STORM WATER SYSTEM. SWEEPINGS BIKE -- SHALL BE PICKED UP AND DISPOSED IN THE TRASH, PARKING 13.AVOID PAVING IN WET WEATHER WHEN PAVING CHEMICALS CAN RUN-OFF INTO THE STORM WATER SYSTEM. i ♦� �� 6, • �� • 14.USE BHP.SUCH AS CHECK-DAMS,BERMS,AND INLET PROTECTION TO PREVENT RUN{FF FROM REACHING DISCHARGE POINTS. 1 — f 0 1 0 15.COVER CATCH BASINS,MANHOLES,AND OTHER DISCHARGE POINTS WHEN APPLYING SEAL COAT,TACK COAT,ETC.TO PREVENT -- -- -- -- -- -- ��• •� 15.COV CING THESE MATELS TO THE STORM WATER SYSMi—i---r—r— — NJ J •••s•••••• ��; SKATEPARK ENTRIES ��I.. n/ -- I L •••••••••••4 , , . e • C 0 ity Hall North Lot ••�'`�:i ;• ' `' LEGEND• �^ +0•� SYMBOL DESCRIPTION WI � ' I / / tt( r 0 Existing Tr.to Remain I / 1 S.s Existing Condition.Plan for I ; I� ,,;� PROPOSED ..1% Bin and 13.0..•I j e •T„= rC -- ►S. SKATEPARK I Ellmg Trw t.W R.m.vd� Note: See Skatepark Plans for urea drains M � and drain line locations within the skatepark Z 0 Prpo..d Parkig Lot T .C l.��. x S C5 l�C - E,IanpLgMPoh x C A a Manage d ntoFmwatVr a Z_ � Management Filter VDUIt Existi g Catch Basin .:.. U. Z roposed Catch Basin a RIM EL.A 151.5 a RI EL 151,06 Prop...dPatingLotLandsping a =u • I•, IE IN 147.6 I.E. OU 144.9• - -•- r v/ I '' W-143.2 ►� IE OUT- 145.1 —_—• tN U ,_I Valley Gutter Slope —� r / / TC 14 76 ••• --� ��� Proposed Drain Line to 1111 e l l Catch Buln wt h Inlet Protection f Cl)U ►�i 1I 71; � 2 r40� S• 54tlnmm hnu I O 153.5 �' 1► F I CONSTRUCTION���555444 �.� F EROSION ac I / TC 4i:d' 0'' SEDIMENT ~~.y' 1 L ` � Fbw Artax +� L ��i O.tom.D.�e,:u:�:��:•7.7.7•�'l�:A'A'���•►'�:•�❖��!Ji�ilV _f CONTROL T XISTING SIDEWALK M PLAN d 11 \ .y,, trw41 •` ►`L r�L 1 •�. ��[. t�L rtMtlg oa: 8 i i < -„, s 111..... � / Adale: 04/S0/07 ii %:.1 r,..;,,k i//14111.11111N1 ; #5 '4. e`t. vM.-4w'14 „ y. '�4 scale:Varies y . w la y) �L T� • drawn: DA iNa 'Y r,fi y ; \="1--1.-1--T-T".1 -T-11-7-1-1-1-11.-1 4 \ 106 no: i // 1 // 11 II City Hall South Lot =4— I, 11 / e •,� -- --- VICINITY MAP ESC -6 CONSTRUCTION EROSION & SEDIMENT CONTROL PLAN /\ 3 v SCALE: 1" = 20' , , • wc,\STER, • I e. 2 2 oe r � 9 DAVID ANDERSON ")10", ` © �� OREGON `��7 . V dpE ARCS`• SW BURNHAM STREET LEGEND �4� e _ . - ..:-.�.........__.— -- — SYMBOL DESCRIPTION ® ; iriml—152—‘-__ Existing Contour•1'Int.rvH, I r C] Existing Catch Bash m -i��._.,L.... , -_.,._....__..-- --- VICINITY MAP < t Ii ._ \ �. RlgftPOl-WaY N�N f I I \ LJ.j,..,„,,,,AH'--,G iiiiiii �, ,,A ��� 8hi Flow Arrow uCB iv. ,. 1/ __.--- '\\ ° z Za \ Sediment Fianna Q (j) 1 TAX LOT 200 ------ IL)\ \ -.)) I' - I \. •. \ \ ']x Eiletlng Tree ` \ ly • -N. . I I .• F— — _. • T PRE-CONSTRUCTION,CLEARING AND DEMOLITION NOTES: • HALL _ rs \ '' 1.ALL BASIC ESC MEASURES(INLET PROTECTION,PERIMETER SEDIMENT CONTROL, ANNE rn IE OUT 150.50` GRAVEL CONSTRUCTION ENTRANCES,ETC.)MUST BE IN PLACE,FUNCTIONAL,AND (MC •E) 9S� \ uE IN 150.55' APPROVED IN AN INITIAL INSPECTION,PRIOR TO COMMENCEMENT OF CONSTRUCTION ACTIVITIES. ��`1_�•;�� 2. SEDIMENT BARRIERS APPROVED FOR USE INCLUDE SEDIMENT FENCE,BERMS CONSTRUCTED U — . �1 t OUT OF MULCH,CHIPPINGS,OR OTHER SUITABLE MATERIAL,STRAW WATTLES,OR OTHER APROVED MATERIALS. O `�f �jj Q t, i tt .f1 CB'\Tn I Ji i I 14 I f •�I AINTAINTED FOR THE DURATION OF THE PROJECT. aDDITIONAL MEASURES INCLUDING,BUT NOT I - I ( I LIMITED TO,STREET SWEEPING AND VACUUMING,MAY BE REQUIRED TO INSURE THAT ALL PAVED AREAS till,'I ARE KEPT CLEAN FOR THE DURATION OF THE PROJECT. I 5. RUN-ON AND RUN-OFF CONTROLS SHALL BE IN PLACE AND FUNCTIONING PROIR TO BEGINNING SUBSTANTIAL IE OUT 146.37 CONSTRUCTION ACTIVITIES. RUN-ON AND RUN-OFF CONTROL CONTROL MEASURES INCLUDE: SLOPE DRAINS, f-- IE IN NORTH 146.42 (WITH OUTLET PROTECTION),CHECK DAMS,SURFACE ROUGHENING,AND BANK STABILIZATION. I- IE IN ClIi NORTH 148.27 IL < D I/ �'_. —i--- — — _ IE IQN NE 148.27 u_ �0 U M j <u_} ?m c23 ! 1 2 N ce �� �� - I J 1 h aN \ . Z I J 1 —, VJU�m __. Z1— J J 0 i- —.-_ J IE OUT 144.76 ; PRE—CONSTRUCTION■ Mai I Q d J N —- - ( / IE IN N 145.O�S EROSION & -- - �I 3 , I W a X N N 146.61 SEDIMENT I I Y ~ �__) _"— .1 CB I CONTROL PLAN 0_ Q TAX LOT 400 �;�� — . ~� 7 Q O- '—r ' I I revisions: f�,%'' I E L .J...4LJ I I j i I .4 I y ! I + I I - I— -_-- _ - - ---- - --- v data: 04/30/07 4 - --�-'_ II 1 , I drawn: DA y 1 I I I I a rj I S ; Joe no: 1 1 'Fl,LED WITH DIR' 1 : 1 1 Alnip.# -- _ _ .,,,,,,,, ,w,,,, - kb.. „A, ; -4...... ESC PRE— CONSTRUCTION EROSION AND SEDIMENT CONTROL PLAN /N 2 SCALE: 1" = 20' ■ ,.. S.PRQ o o c. -0000s • MEMORANDUM T I GARD TO: Cheryl Gaines, Associate Planner FROM: Brian Rager, Assistant Public Works Director I RE: Skate Park: Minor Modification Request for Parking Configuration DATE: June 19, 2007 Public Works recently expanded and striped the Niche parking lot and found that we were able to gain additional parking spaces than what was proposed on the plan that was reviewed as a part of the land use application (SDR 2006-00005). In short, we were able to gain six additional spaces from what was proposed. Because of this, we are proposing to leave another existing bank of parking adjacent to the skate park as-is. Net Gain in Parking Figure 1 shows the proposed parking changes as proposed on the plan for SDR 2006-00005. The breakdown is as follows: ♦ Niche: 30 regular stalls 1 handicap stall 31 Total Stalls lT ♦ Bank Adj. to Skate Park: 16 Stalls (L4 exist now) GRAND TOTAL: 47 Stalls Figure 2 shows the end result of the expansion and re-striping of the Niche parking lot. The proposal in this minor modification request is that we leave the bank of parking adjacent to the skate park alone, as the breakdown would now be: ♦ Niche: 36 regular stalls 1 handicap stall 37 Total Stalls • Bank Adj. to Skate Park: WExisting Stalls GRAND TOTAL: Stalls 49 Skate Park Minor Modification Page 1 This minor modification request would result in f, r additional parking spaces over what was shown in the land use application. Justification for Minor Modification '1'DC 18.360.060 states that a minor modification can be approved provided the request does not qualify as a major modification. 18.360.050.B lists the evaluation criteria for major modifications. Below we will show that this request will not be: 1. An increase in dwelling unit density, or lot coverage for residential development; There are no dwelling units proposed with the development, nor with the minor mod request. Therefore, this criterion is met. 2. A change in the ratio or number of different types of dwelling units; There are no dwelling units proposed with the development, nor with the minor mod request. Therefore, this criterion is met. 3. A change that requires additional on-site parking in accordance with Chapter 18.765; The proposed change does not trigger the need for additional parking. The change, in and of itself, adds parking. Therefore, this criterion is met. 4. A change in the type of commercial or industrial structures as defined by the Uniform Building Code; There are no structures proposed with this project that are recognized by the Uniform Building Codc. The minor mod request does not change that. Therefore, this criterion is met. 5. An increase in the height of the building(s) by more than 20%; There are no buildings in the project. The change in parking does not result in an increase in the height of the skate park either. Therefore, this criterion is met. 6. A change in the type and location of accessways and parking areas where off- site traffic would be affected; The change in parking configuration does not alter driveway locations. The Niche parking configuration remains a one-way movement with additional parking spaces available. Therefore, this criterion is met. 7. An increase in vehicular traffic to and from the site and the increase can be expected to exceed 100 vehicles per day; The parking modification does not alter the traffic generated from the project. This criterion is therefore met. Skate Park Minor Modification Page 2 8. An increase in the floor area proposed for a nonresidential use by more than 10% excluding expansions under 5,000 square feet; There are no buildings in the project, and the parking change will not increase the area of the skate park. Therefore, this criterion is met. 9. A reduction in the area reserved for common open space and/or usable open space which reduces the open space area below the minimum required by this code or reduces the open space area by more than 10%; There are no common open space areas that will be impacted by this change. The parking surface areas remain the same. Therefore, this criterion is met. 10. A reduction of project amenities below the minimum established by this code or by more than 10%where specified in this site plan: a. Recreational facilities; b. Screening; and/or c. Landscaping provisions The modification will not result in reductions in the skate park area, screening or landscape square footage. The parking surface areas remain unchanged. In fact, there will be a slight gain in landscape square footage, as the existing tree and planter island in the bank of parking adjacent to the skate park will remain. The proposed land use plan would have resulted in the removal of this island and the installation of two tree wells that would have given much less landscape area than the existing planter. Therefore, this criterion is met. 11. A modification to the conditions imposed at the time of site development review approval which are not the subject of B1 through 10 above of this subsection. This subject of this modification request is covered well by B1 through 10 above. Therefore, this criterion is met. All criteria of 18.360.050 are met such that this request can be considered a minor modification. We ask that the Community Development Director approve this modification. G.,,.,n ‘ S fac-e.: i '1 N;eke. . L se. 4 >pau s h y -ikt J Ak par L. 61 101.44,4 i on Al&C.. tY.i5 el S pce - (c1oa la d a rem. . N Q{-- 1c+'f n oar 414 0 5944 e.P. FINAL APPROVAL CITY O TIGAHU PLANN4N3 INViSPOOS BY C_Cziirw _ JATE_ `34_ Z Skate Park Minor Modification Page 3 ------------ - - - -- - - - - - - - - - - - 1� _v I SW BURNHAM STREET 30' 1 fi I 1 r I1 r \I J -.! , , : ,, , „ _,, \ 1 I I , / _ \ \ cliche / Skatepark Lot - 31 Spaces 4 N r.-r1E, - AS %( 4 ,' ♦♦♦♦♦♦ *1 L.12414.> VS �' r alk C 4i1 W `\ - 20 ft-4101.44g tAtAf> �� r 7 . I C . I Nat c? STALL ei,1' I "4 I _ CITY 1G C '�. 15 3 'c ,a` S a+t.k,S HALL ►♦, ' A\ NEX 1 I �;!; )1 . 125' (NICHE) C BIKE 15 1 PARKING _ 1 tc.a . e 1, 1•1 C,3 6 `us' ` Q`� 1N�1,$) O 1, i. Z.tl.s' \ 1 I r f 8.5 ♦♦♦♦♦♦♦♦♦♦ •♦• I +2 , I \ 1 ! 18.5' ♦♦♦♦.♦♦♦♦ ♦' PROPOSED SKATEPARK ES 11 I 1 ♦A♦♦♦ ♦ i ♦♦♦♦♦ �/ APPROX 2' ABOVE *3•4I*1 .♦� �� EX15TINCA ELEVATION'rth Lot - Socs .:♦ 1, J. r?.5' �-.5 ,C16.5' PROPOSED t3 Q Ma 8' C V :• WO 25 - ,♦4 Not Final skatepark bowl design 15 not completed. W J II 0 C �4∎ I-- _ - 0 •-4.. .--101111t4.4C, 0 4 2 0 NM I♦� Q < I X _ WM lOr C 11 4 x x "-• i -• 1411111Pr SA5,1114C./ -,zr c3 i Proposed 5tormwater I Existing Catch basin Valley Gutter 510:= o- - opose- ' I. �iN Management Filter vault r _ RIM EL 151.06 1• P RIM EL 151.5 I.E. OUT 144.96 RI I.E. I.E. OUT 141b ( it IC l44.T� 11 TC TC 14.5.1 I. ii ' If II ' II S5' 154.0 153 i j u , n II .- .'7,',XS!-:MI 3 r.i:..1 1 .4 TC > u 1 15 TC (N L tog HEIGHT i I 6 ..,,,,,. A..it. W ' 30' Vision • Triangle 34' T r it Fil- • : 1 ' i 1 ,'ill i 11 i City a I I South Lot - 33 Soa ces 1 4, 12.5' - • - p 0 is U U U ! � I � > i4. 1 , , r,; a_ ! a I -r _ : a uiolu . : , , ,, I 1 f -,-- jo i - I et : 1 i I � I 1 ! • 1 1L €e. Z SW Burnham Street Revised Niche Parking Lot June 18, 2007• • ________ . . ________ . • ________ . . \ I \ I 36 Regular Stalls I 1 Ha dicap Stall 37 Total falls 1 \ 1 I P • / SW Hall Blvd. i / I ,- / CITY HALL HC / \Iii■ ..--- - -. /i I ANNEX (NICHE) 2:. e e 0 e * e S 0 ct ,..;, 0 ,_ r , „ „ , „ , , , , , „ Cheryl Caines-Fwd: FW: Itr re: parking condition 5 bR.700 6 -c)o0 o S 5 Ka-k Pa rk , Page 1 From: Cheryl Caines To: Buxton, Maris; Plaza, Daniel Date: 9/7/2007 4:33:41 PM Subject: Fwd: FW: ltr re: parking condition Dan, After realizing we had counted Town Hall twice in the parking calculations the number of spaces needed went down to 11. Once the Niche lot was expanded and striped we gained an additional 6 spaces. Based on Brian's modification request you will lose 4. Putting you at a net gain of 2 spaces. (Down to 9 spaces). The library needed 15 City Hall spaces, but the library parking lot has been expanded by an additional 20 spaces. Therefore there should be a surplus of 4 spaces. Conditon#4 can be signed off. Cheryl >>> Daniel Plaza 09/06 3:53 PM >>> I believe the attached flow of emails satisfy's condition #4 Tom Coffee's approval is in the sequence of emails dated 5/7/07 at 4:01 PM let me know if you think differently Thanks Dan Plaza Parks and Facilities Manager City of Tigard 503 718 2590 daniel©tigard-or.gov Remember: If You Think You Can, or You Think You Can't, You're Right CURRENT STATUS UPDATED # DESCRIPTION STATUSA DATE; BY DATE BY 22. ODOT drainage Permit is ired for connection to state highway drainag ilities. S.1 2.oO�_oCDO 23 EROSION CONTROL PLAN M 5/31/2007 KSM 5/31/2007 KSM 23. An erosion control plan shall be provided as part of the Site Permit drawings. The plan shall conform to the"Erosion Prevention and Sediment Control Design and Planning Manual,February 2003 edition." 24 AMEND TMC TO PROHIBIT ALCOHOL M 7/27/2007 CAC 7/27/2007 CAC 24. The applicant/owner shall amend the Tigard Municipal code(7.52.100)to prohibit the possession,control or consumption of alcoholic beverages in Tigard Skate Park. 25 OBTAIN NECESSARY SIGN PERMITS N CAC 4/4/2007 MSB 25. A separate sign permit will be required for all tenant signage prior to installation. 26 TREES OVER 12"DEED RESTRICTION N CAC 4/4/2007 MSB 26. The applicant/owner shall record a deed restriction to the effect that any existing tree greater than 12"diameter may be removed only if the tree dies or is hazardous according to a certified arborist. The deed restriction may be removed or will be considered invalid if a tree preserved in accordance with this decision should either die or be removed as a hazardous tree. 27 COMPLETE ALL WORK IN ROW N KSM 4/4/2007 MSB 27. Prior to a final inspection,the applicant shall complete any work in the public right-of-way and obtain approval from ODOT and the City of Tigard Engineering Department. 28 PAY FEE IN LIEU OF UG UTILITIES N KSM 4/4/2007 MSB 28. If the applicant proposes to provide lighting or other electrical services to the skate park they shall pay the fee in-lieu of under grounding. The fee shall be calculated by the frontage of the site that is parallel to the utility lines and will be$35.00 per lineal foot. 29 AGREEMENT WITH STORMWATER MANAGE N KSM 4/4/2007 MSB 29. Prior to a final inspection,the applicant shall demonstrate that they have entered into a maintenance agreement with Stormwater Management,or another company that demonstrates they can meet the maintenance requirements of the manufacturer,for the proposed onsite storm water treatment facility. 30 FINAL SIGHT DISTANCE CERT N KSM 4/4/2007 MSB 30. Prior to final inspection,the applicant's engineer shall submit final sight distance certification for both driveways. Condition Status Index: M=Met N=Not Met Ping-CaseConditions.rpt Page 3 of 3 CITY OF TIGARD, OREGON TIGARD CITY COUNC ORDINANCE NO. 07- I AN ORDINANCE AMENDING TIGARD MUNICIPAL CODE (TMC) 7.52.100(3) REGARDING ALCOHOLIC BEVERAGES IN PARKS WHEREAS,in response to complaints and concerns regarding alcohol consumption in downtown area parks,the Council adopted Ordinance 06-08 in June 2006;and WHEREAS, this ordinance prohibited the use of alcoholic beverages in all of the existing downtown parks including. Liberty Park,Main Street Park,Commercial Park and Fanno Creek Park;and WHEREAS,in order to maintain the alcohol ban in any future downtown park,the Council must amend the TMC each time a new park is created within the downtown area;and WHEREAS, several new parks may be developed within the Urban Renewal Zone (downtown area) in the future,and it is somewhat cumbersome and time consuming to amend the TMC each time a new park is created;and WHEREAS, this amendment creates a "blanket" restriction on the consumption of alcoholic beverages in all city-owned parks within the Urban Renewal Zone,thereby eliminating the need to update the TMC each time a new park is created;and WHEREAS,this amendment would apply to the parks specified above, as well as any future City parks created within the Urban Renewal Zone,including the Jim Griffith Memorial Skate Park. NOW,THEREFORE,THE CITY OF TIGARD ORDAINS AS FOLLOWS: SECTION 1: The City Council approves the amendment to Tigard Municipal Code Chapter 7.52.100(3) as follows: (Strike-through text is deleted;underlined text is added.) (3) It is unlawful to possess, control, or consume any alcoholic beverage in any existing or future City park located within the downtown Urban Renewal Zone. following parks: Liberty Park, Main Strcct Park, Commercial Park, and Fanno Creck Park. ORDINANCE No.b - Page 1 0 -1�I • SECTION 2: This ordinance shall be effective 30 days after its passage by the Council, signature by the Mayor, and posting by the City Recorder. PASSED: By rnajD6 k vote of all Council members present after being read by number and title only,this 'day of ,2007. Catil EA.&)1_0 Catherine Wheatley, City Recorder APPROVED: By Tigard City Council this OPP C U' day of W ' ,2007. 4, Cr.•: ksen,Mayor Approved as to 1foorm• V � ity Attorney Date ORDINANCE No.'% Page 2 0-7414 .� , 3DR Ob -00005 • , ,: . . o Y r . Department of State Lands � �""'�-" 1 � V�� 775 Summer Street NE,Suite 100 / Theodore R.Kulongoski,Governor Salem,OR 97301 1279 /s_a9 (503)378-3805 FAX(503)378-4844 www.oregonstatelands.us. May 2, 2008 , State Land Board MAY 0 3 2008 Theodore R. Kulongoski Kim McMillan City of Tigard Governor 13125 SW Hall Blvd Bill Bradbury Tigard, OR 97223 Secretary of State Randall Edwards Re: Wetland Delineation Report for 13125 SW Hall Blvd, Tigard, Washington State Treasurer County, T2S R1W Sec. 2DA, Tax Lot 401 (portion); WD #07-0697 Dear Ms. McMillan: The Department of State Lands has reviewed the wetland delineation report prepared by Zion Natural Resources Consulting for the site referenced above. Please note that the study area includes only a portion of the tax lots described above (please see the attached maps). Based upon our review, we concur with their delineation and conclusions. Within the study area, 1 wetland (totaling approximately 0.8 acres) was identified. The wetland is subject to the permit requirements of the state Removal-Fill Law. A state permit is required for cumulative fill or annual excavation of 50 cubic yards or more in the wetlands. This concurrence is for purposes of the state Removal-Fill Law only. Federal or local permit requirements may apply as well. The Army Corps of Engineers will review the report and make a determination of jurisdiction for purposes of the Clean Water Act at the time that a permit application is submitted. We recommend that you attach a copy of this concurrence letter to both copies of any subsequent joint permit application to speed application review. Please be advised that state law establishes a preference for avoidance of wetland impacts. Because measures to avoid and minimize wetland impacts may include reconfiguring parcel layout and size or development design, we recommend that you work with Department staff on appropriate site design before completing the city or county land use approval process. This concurrence is based on information provided to the agency. The jurisdictional determination is valid for five years from the date of this letter, unless new information necessitates a revision. Circumstances under which the Department may change a determination and procedures for renewal of an expired determination are found in OAR 141-090-0045 (available on our web site or upon request). The applicant, landowner, or agent may submit a request for reconsideration of this determination in writing within 60 calendar days of the date of this letter. G:\WWC\Wetlands Program\WD Letters\2007107-0697.doc Thank you for having the site evaluated. Please phone me at 503-986-5236 if you have any questions. Sincerely, owe C Jane C. Morlan, PWS Wetlands Program Manager Enclosures cc: Eric Henning, Zion Natural Resources Consulting City of Tigard Planning Department (Maps enclosed for updating LWI) James McMillan, Corps of Engineers Damon Reische, Clean Water Services Carrie Landrum, DSL G:\WWC\Wetlands Program\WD Letters\2007\07-0697.doc , .s , A \' —'1/4 - 'A. .'. IMP" ',.,,..:„)1.77-!.r..77. ----1 ----t- 7---..._,....___!- , 1 ; :'....?. -.7.=-'=.--..z...--'-=__.--=li ..._. 1?...,..._, _ . _...._ . .., , ._ Lulert/LbwiumianO, . 4 ; newurer •. '\ . '',... '1111111 I . ,1 1 ••• 7-,__ I L______,L .. Ir._u.._____. ,.._...._. :L....: - •, :.,,c, .,,, ' 1111,4 - ---'---;T-----1.1 9,01*taw a- i' ' i f ;--- , )., _ f .,, • 1 ,,., 1 ._,.. ,, . i 1 L...sw Kapieteaf St s .... ..,..s,,;,,Fxn,ci .. :„.z ,... ,. 5 • / « •,- ''' Sw Ozik Way 1 ,- ,,, .- 1, ,, ,, ' 1, g.1 i! .., 7.7-,— 1 Sw Oak St ; .:::...; --:,---7- 1 :€ • N41,00.1, _I i- -- : - ..*...-. 1 - , ',i'.4,.L., ."-',') 2°2%. i '-''''''- •''7----- - ---'-' __ . . I sw..mpot _ . ..,,,viiia mow I, .—.......-, Vs•A'g'f,!,:,. kil .i .'.1h.„_ '..VR,;,:A,S;',;',. '''' •' 5 :-. . Vi i ., i t-sPliSpruceSt ;'.. 2:1......F.Li .---' ,...•_:..:77., -1- 1 10-- • r,■' 1./A.:."-::::F !..:1 1 r- ,..7::::. :-, .. it "-1 r.....,-1 I, i. ,,,,4,,, ell -'.--'.gy ..„ i,. ; 1 294 6-, -':-.- .-.:-.L.-..:.-,- ,TT, - - ma. ,• • - .---r- ,, 0'0* 293 Al--ll--..---`?t '---- i 1.. . _,.., ...., ...... . , :....,-.:::-...., ,.:- I -„,.,...,i ,,,,,,„ - , , , ,,,,,,„,,,,,,,,,,, • ,,,, x ' 4 i • 1, I — f,' '..,1. ..,c7.-..5, :----:,,-! -:.; , ,..,,,,, i t .: .;„,•,.,..,lik- if SW „_---,''- ',,, ....,„-_._21'.... 4. 0--7:,P--. ,•,-----1\, /., ,,,,,..' -i, \.,. s '•,-..-_01 -, .- ..,...2' . . ,.., , ---4,,,,,,,, .:•....../..-:::;:-..".e...,--.-.e...:-J .,,-......--.,7.N Sw EPOO Int Si __: 1 292 gird '-i-' i 1-.----•,„. '-.',': '' ,•:-' ---.,-.. ..,'-,0,-,:.:" -:-... i.... • •. ,! ... .. , : 6 SW Hetnicso*i.7 ! i' - i -.7., ;'---.--;; c:;',:,;-;.....,4:::::,7:::-.2,://./....,. ,,,,9, ..„,-;„. -4',,,,,..,,,,,,,• •%_, ---7...-:..,-•1_____.. , , i 1 ,_-_ -)'''-s,..-i,,,,_,17, s,c,..:,'7,4,./.04;>-.,</'%-"' ,f0'...,-•::''''.`-•,, '''' .,\Z''';'14fr s- '.':::'7."''- -i''7''''''''''''; ',*'.:'-,''''':: -41`''''''.,,<--4'2' N-'..,,, ''' '''',.*.' , 44nZagi—Th ' . '''..-1 • :; .c.',2"';'..,-464.••••.-,!:,-... .4.K.,--';', -•°-'..:•■!,q,,,,isow41,„ '' ,! i ') - SW iiii64kSt : i;. i::-I 01 ' r/'*'---•:',.. 4 ''''' -'''•''''''"'''----) 3-...s.... , - -_ _ ,r ..„,.: • , t ,....1,.I0,-c- - 292 .,- , if i ,. t '-‘'..t..- I.! , __, ••--.i -- %..Yliii= • .h- 1 ''; Tomb ,,,, ' 4# ....''' 8:-, .'...A..,,, -----7 '',„\, '-. e_' '..;:'•, ..r.:-''',;) , ,',4,,' ...'T,,•:,:. .,.,:, (,) :r- st_i .....2:;:, ,:, -,:', '.--,:', `-.:: s:.'. ---,•-, Fano°ow* :,.. ' 1 1 -- I ' ---- ITE [- , „,,, • 1!-• c.„-.0,,„,,>: -,„,,<„,..- --- ; , .. • ,,„ .„.„ 7,2,•-,-,-..,,',, ,,,,- sw_strivood ftc i.. sy,Teckceoer Dr..,,:„:„._.; 22B --„7,-.... 7,, •,t•P . :c '-' si- kt u ).;;,. --- :----; 1 ' '-1 4t-- ,t---7 .-;......_,, ,,/,--:_t .... st .- 1. /-- Sw McDonald St ---..IS,!sw aor a .--: ••-• sw Landm3 ;,......_ swptXL :,,4,1,•, n•:- 31rA,. polisee- ''''''a •2 9i 2, A rPce 11 _..;,. iimaid,,,inL---'71111■-;_'.---);• - c' .:1‘ c--7---:/ '''' L':• i: '1.6'N;'• ',1* Boa,---.7.•.-77", 1 7----Iti•••',"77..7' 1 i- --.) :--' ' ,". i i i 1 ■,.' `,„ ,I ,,,,,,,-;,;,. :771 ,,,' -•-• • . .. ,.; ,,,et •••• . •c.....:24... ,..;_,7,.•.:.....:_.., ii ; i„,„t 1, .,1 4 t 1,—, „ ill ,i .i. ..,,,,. ti 1 i it -,,, b. .,,...,„. . „.,,,, . , „--,- ,.•,,, it.f. V.. . lc,. i ::±1 ..7.!1,1 r,' '.' ,-,....1=i -t:,:1 g 1 1 i-4 ':, 1_7.!------.;. 291 t 4, ' '. !: ',.%. :::.;-.-. --,.i. 'Satitri.tt i 1 .-- --Zi I:. -a IT SW-Redwapd IA .. 1,-SW:14.90,000*-- 3 : :IX-----..*::,;-- --:I.:: '-'1-.''• r:`--$.if." C t L. . .;•..:7..._ I.:..iw mit St '11' 1,' .)... :-;--,.:; i*litittlaWerSt;'..„.,'. 1,, • .,,..7. r- , " • w4. il il . , -- .--,- __ -- • • . .... .-- !-..1::,. .-.,-,-,--,,\n‘, ,•----,------- 1" ,:-- i, 2 J......-:_.-: Cib, SW Ka*Lri R.L.). ;V1.Si.r.-::',1 r . '' .•..".,i -1 :IL,__; sununer field Golf .:",.;:-!, -..___',' k I c iiimar r0 ' ..... ,,„,,,,- ,'-2., 4,,,irc , • Club,•!-,.. :.„it ,,,...._....„.„.....„,i - - , I:: -w - , ' 0-)i "/- . 1---- ,.,.,77.77.1.7.;-•. ±.....::,-.7„-:',- - ..;--, ',';4-.,..,..,- ..,,,-.,./,-,./4,.----:,es: ., ivedion 0 ._ tt;* ..:1 J! ,I. V-0-"'"....,".----',.`..::'-'..-2,) :I, ON Duit,04 Ott:-''",;'): ;-..;,-,,,,":. ,L„,,i ------)„1.!..,„.11',4,---,-- -'-41.--,t t-.;.,‹-t •-i , iS Shaffer Ln t ,...... .A7x,4Z,..... 1 , _,„,, ,. . . ..,.. ' T i 1 -) ;L - ' .:..,- -t•-•:' /A ''':" -'. 1 L L ,.-• "--•- NI 1E >. FIGURE 1 N k,.. II Vicinity Map J. -.1.1171 ..rlo r"--731-•■"---71,-, Project: Skate Park Expansion . Natural Kesources Consulting s _} 14 Zion Natural Resources ulting 1 }( 2S 1 0201 N. • 1I i -� •••• yr' ' -. • .. M ICR 1197) too mom•N Pm 31 NU • t.•4...• • . I !Is • VI.% 411,.01 de y , \ Tex Ict- LtoI t `ti 1 w1 ›a ,Iii■ M `w6. `, i ,ws y s a u .n...0- d' ,a 4, WD01- . • jrREY €_ ',...\ . 23-74 •t ba ' I K l.M t t .fur I a •L�. P 4. z ....• i 701 15a unra. ame CA t • •Nw• n ////••gyApp t { warl _ • .4, ' SW fcR bel► oMARA z STREET.—""STREET" ' 6+0 a. . 11rrw f env - ..r............. MK t. i ...Ira', 6... • O • 2S 1 02Df Z I O N FIGURE 2 N �'�`� ` Tax Lot Map ‘ .71 ,rA r �1. .�i w e Natural Resources Consulting \s, Project: Skate Park Expansion s Zion Natural Resources Consulting 15 f • N, ■ � � ____ k / (T.: iNI ——,_ . O = I N _____-- r .........„...____. ) 7) c cli f1 0 . c ) FLAG POLE 0 o Z irrigation n = ��— FLAG POLE• fi \ STUDYAREABOUNDARY /. rt CA 17895 SQ.FT. w ( DSIWO# O7.— O 7 50' CWS SET BACK Approval Issued ._ 1— a- 1��2 e 1 Approval�xOlres .� -o-— 1 L? 0 ..g. * N n a11 0 m MI �"... ..LhElLe.N D a + Pr J my '� <.�� �.---^_'``-- aar.E OF FOND ...._..� o ar . _ 2G0 �7 L nit_,r1 l} N Y • A) 7 LEGEND .wer-spa 3540 SQ. FT. . SP 1 ■ SAMPLE 'LUT WETLAND AREA I • • • 1 'ETLAA.7 AREA ST.iOY P=:IINDARY `v;e:Lfj„u 5 e I& 1 IW�(J� i Wetland areas were surveyed with a Topcon OS CD 802A 5" total stolon to an accuracy of t 7 foot Er1/2/2008 CITY OF TIGARD 11:14:02AM 13125 SW Hall Blvd. TIGARD Tigard,OR 97223 (503)639-4171 Conditions Associated With Case #: SDR2006-00005 Project Name: TIGARD SKATE PARK CURRENT I STATUS I UPDATED All # DESCRIPTION STATUS* DATE BY DATE BY 1 REVISED WALKWAY PLAN M 5/11/2007 CAC 5/12/2007 CAC 1. Prior to site work the applicant shall submit a revised site plan for review and approval showing the walkway from the City Hall North parking lot to the sidewalk adjacent to Police headquarters marked with striping or contrasting pavement materials. 2 LANDSCAPE PLAN M 5/11/2007 CAC 5/12/2007 CAC 2. Prior to site work the applicant shall submit for review and approval a landscape plan showing the types,size and number of plantings to be installed. 3 STREET TREE PLAN M 12/31/2007 CAC 12/31/2007 CAC 3. If street trees are removed to meet site distance requirements,then street trees shall be replaced to meet the current standards,outside of the site distance line. A site plan showing the size and species of the proposed street trees shall be submitted for review and approval prior to planting. 4 PARKING SPACE PLAN M 9/7/2007 CAC 9/26/2007 CAC 4. Prior to site/building permit issuance the applicant shall provide a plan for review and approval that shows the minimum parking requirements are being met by providing an additional 17 parking spaces. These spaces shall not be further than 500 feet from the primary site(TDC 18.765.030.B). 5 BIKE RACK DETAIL M 5/11/2007 CAC 5/12/2007 CAC 5. The applicant shall provide for review and approval a detail of the bike racks to be used. 6 TREE FENCING INSTALLED&APPROVED M 6/1/2007 CAC 6/1/2007 CAC 6. Tree Protection-Prior to any site work the applicant shall install all proposed tree protection fencing. The fencing shall be inspected and approved by the Project Arborist and City Planner(Cheryl Caines)prior to commencing any site work. The tree protection fencing shall remain in place through the duration of all of the building construction phases,until the Certificate of Occupancy has been approved. 7 FINAL TREE PLAN M 6/1/2007 CAC 6/1/2007 CAC 7. Prior to issuance of building permits,the applicant shall submit site plan drawings indicating the location of the trees that were preserved on the lot during site development,location of tree protection fencing,and a signature of approval from the project arborist regarding the placement and construction techniques to be employed in building the structures. All proposed protection fencing shall be installed and inspected prior to commencing construction. The fencing shall remain in place through the duration of all of the building construction phases,until the Certificate of Occupancy has been approved. After approval from the City Forester,the tree protection measures may be removed. 8 BI-WKLY ARBORIST REPORTS M 10/18/2007 CAC 1/2/2008 CAC 8. The applicant shall have an on-going responsibility to ensure that the Project Arborist has submitted written reports to the Planning Department(Cheryl Caines),at least once every two weeks,as the Project Arborist monitors the construction activities from initial tree protection zone(TPZ)fencing installation through the building construction phases. The reports shall evaluate the condition and location of the tree protection fencing,determine if any changes occurred to the TPZ,and if any part of the Tree Protection Plan has been violated.If the amount of TPZ was reduced,then the Project Arborist shall justify why the fencing was moved and shall certify that the construction activities did not adversely impact the overall, long-term health and stability of the tree(s). If the reports are not submitted to the City at the scheduled intervals,and if it appears the TPZ's or the Tree Protection Plan are not being followed by the contractor or a sub-contractor,the City can stop work on the project until an inspection can be done by City Staff and the Project Arborist. Prior to issuance of any Certificates of Occupancy,the Project Arborist will submit a final certification indicating the elements of the Tree Protection Plan were followed and that all remaining trees on the site are healthy,stable,and viable in their modified growing environment. 9 MEET VISUAL CLEAR REQ/HALL BLVD M 4/20/2007 CAC 4/20/2007 CAC 9. When Hall Boulevard is widened,the current visual clearance requirements shall be met unless a Site Distance Certification is provided that shows the site distance requirements can be met. 10 PFI REQUIRED M 5/14/2007 KSM 5/14/2007 KSM 10. A Public Facility Improvement(PFI)permit is required for this project to cover driveway improvements on Burnham Ping-CaseConditions.rpt Page 1 of 3 ENGINEERING PLANNING LANDSCAPE ARCHITECTURE FORESTRY SURVEYING 13910 S.W.Galbreath Dr.,Suite 100 Offices Located In: Sherwood,Oregon 97140 SHERWOOD,OREGON Phone: (503)925-8799 ENGINEERING&FORESTRY REDMOND,OREGON Fax:(503)925-8969 VANCOUVER,WASHINGTON www.aks-eng.com October 18, 2007 Cheryl Caines —Assistant Planner City of Tigard, Oregon 13125 SW Hall Blvd. Tigard, OR 97223 Phone: 503-639-4171 Fax: 503-684-7297 RE: Follow up to the Final Arborist Assessment for the Tigard Skate Park(AKS Job # 1802). Dear Ms. Caines: The purpose of this letter is to follow up on the construction activities of the retaining wall for the tree wells and the subsurface"French drain",which were not completed as outlined in the final arborist report for the Tigard Skate Park dated October 8, 2007. On October 17, 2007 I visited the site and verified that the retaining wall for the tree wells and the "French drain"were installed in the locations that I recommended to Steve Martin(Supervisor of the Park and Recreation Department for the City of Tigard). The location of these structures disturbed a minimal area of each tree's root zone and caused little to no lasting damage to the trees. The remaining construction activities for this project are the proposed path(to be constructed by the boy scouts)and the landscaping. Both activities are proposed to be located outside the trees root zones. In closing, all the trees on site appear to be healthy and vigorous with no signs of stress due to construction of the skate park. Please let me know if you have any questions, Very Truly Yours, CEO CERTIFIED AKS Engineering& Forestry,LLC. RPM. Ann Irk w • IRPL■11111 MP.:RI Randy Killen ,•'' ARBORIST Certified Arborist PN-5948A RANDY KILLEN CERTIFICATE NUMBER YN-5948A Certified Tree Risk Assessor# 198 EXPIRATION DATE. 121311200$ Arborist Disclosure Statement Arborists are tree specialists who use their education, knowledge,training, and experience to examine trees, recommend measures to enhance the health of trees, and attempt to reduce the risk of living near trees. The Client and Jurisdiction may choose to accept or disregard the recommendations of the arborist, or seek additional advice. Arborists cannot detect every condition that could possibly lead to the structural failure of a tree. Trees are living organisms that fail in ways we do not fully understand. Conditions are often hidden within trees and below ground. Arborists cannot guarantee that a tree will be healthy or safe under all circumstances, or for a specified period of time. Likewise,remedial treatments, like medicine, cannot be guaranteed. Trees can be managed,but they cannot be controlled. To live near trees is to accept some degree of risk. The only way to eliminate all risk associated with trees is to eliminate all trees. ENGINEERING PLANNING LANDSCAPE ARCHITECTURE FORESTRY SURVEYING 13910 S.W.Galbreath Dr., Suite 100 1.1114 Offices Located In: Sherwood,Oregon 97140 SHERWOOD,OREGON Phone:(503)925-8799 ENGINEERING&FORESTRY REDMOND,OREGON Fax:(503)925-8969 VANCOUVER,WASHINGTON www.aks-eng.com June 1, 2007 Maris Buxton—Permit Coordinator City of Tigard, Oregon 13125 SW Hall Blvd. Tigard, OR 97223 Phone: 503-639-4171 Fax: 503-684-7297 RE: Required Bi-Monthly Arborist Report for Tigard Skate Park (AKS Job # 1802). Dcar Maris Buxton: As a Condition of Approval, the following Bi-Monthly Arborist Report letter is to affirm that the construction activities for: Tigard Skate Park t/ is in compliance with the approved Tree Protection and Removal Plan. On June 1, 2007, the site was visited for compliance with the Tree Protection and Removal Plan. The following is a checklist of construction activities that have been inspected inside the tree protection zone (TPZ): Compliance Violation 1- Location of tree protection fence X 2- Condition of tree protection fence is adequate X 3- Preserved trees are healthy and unharmed X 4- No dumping of material within the TPZ X 5- Roots (>1")within excavation are pruned X 6- No compaction within the TPZ X 7- No fill within the TPZ X To this date, all construction activities for the Tigard Skate Park comply with the approved Tree Protection and Removal Plan. The only changes to have occurred to the plan were the parking area to the north is not part of the project and should not have been included in the tree protection plan and the tree protection fence along the south and north boundary of the project was adjusted to stop at limits of the construction activity. (Attached is a revised tree protection plan). All preserved trees on site have been observed to be healthy and stable. Please let me know if you have any questions, Very Truly Yours, CERTIFIED AKS Engineering& Forestry,LLC. I U▪M' • t>,/,/ IV% 11 ARBORIST Randy Killen RANDY KILLEN Certified Arborist PN-5948A CERTIFICATE NUMBER PN•5948A Certified Tree Risk Assessor# 198 EXPIRATION DATE: 1201/2088 Arborist Disclosure Statement Arborists are tree specialists who use their education, knowledge, training, and experience to examine trees, recommend measures to enhance the health of trees, and attempt to reduce the risk of living near trees. The Client and Jurisdiction may choose to accept or disregard the recommendations of the arborist, or seek additional advice. Arborists cannot detect every condition that could possibly lead to the structural failure of a tree. Trees are living organisms that fail in ways we do not fully understand. Conditions are often hidden within trees and below ground. Arborists cannot guarantee that a tree will be healthy or safe under all circumstances, or for a specified period of time. Likewise,remedial treatments, like medicine, cannot be guaranteed. Trees can be managed, but they cannot be controlled. To live near trees is to accept some degree of risk. The only way to eliminate all risk associated with trees is to eliminate all trees. ALOIDONAL TREE PRFSERVATK)N NOTES TREE PRESERVATION NOTES TREE REMOVAL AND WA a A. HIDMPD ro 11.16101001.T NM 1MED W,POI.EOPEXE r>:•soma r.M 0A I.art Cwx¢S W M.11000 ERIE PRISOWa0 A 1800 010113 HM MII 10 PERS.lip 00111[1 a0 AMID IIIIM M MOWED i rn 1...a. - I. �r rnnPwn R.W NT IQE 52 113 MF HMI SEC11Ma MEW[ ROM 9100.WOW MOW 010101.O 25¢.0915 OUP.OOMA•901. 2:2100:0010¢: 2 MR MORC15 W H 161¢11 71510 PROTECTION i MI 6[0.180.Aw RED.1 PU6 wH[a61PUCiCw 4 B AnA3MEm TO MEZ aaW 010918[1.01 NO rtRSO1r vwE M.Am aPa*ro•n { LEGEND Em MD�1.x ,¢01,:700:::; ]ORAw CO.Sr.Crox rtATa.ro a 161x1111 ``,'r EI1.( 1.. _ 111110:e.„ W 110E M UPS a C.N.C. ry 06113 OMAHA PRE E M7OI A 131 H:K.4 6 H01.rtA,M NM ¢ Q Mn 1.90 KNKMn N I � I I 901E ERECT xO A.X1 HART USHE PRORCM ME MOP P.C. 1110 I -" Eat DP[apiE.r 911010X6 M PM=PRO a.M]RCI0 TOM¢t I/1 a _.. __ •• (c'�r I.wx H Ha.00 W W.N wM IA111 W A OFPm OE a¢16151(6 100 OR HM 1.11.01 S lm \ `w3rt i 113] 11]5 \ 4� F]1116¢[1.405 MI POH TO 10100E 10015 TRW aE 69 m EO M OE A 1R n ' , �1�1 A ®I IJJ 3 NOW gWA004XLh4 Cr UAIN OR OT[9 Pol[MWIf D.C. u wr4.0148•WNm.r1aFsae .>r I I :;f m51NG 1114 1 0 115 aWWU5 TREE A wr H 111010 TO MORD ROOT WKC[md1wiO5 A 10["e)1001 DEEP n Y IM¢r.AU w1•r9wxBl.x w MO110 Y M r�n rn 4l wx R (. J I IHI0l 01 EDGE a CXOUL NO MC 10 CIE91a S.R DE S a 1185 TO H •MRaw/01 Dona IWm..R..19 r 4.MOwraF•P0c9 Am mt Xcr P.Na N WO 06111141 NM rn•wr xaI `' S WYHH1.E0roNM c01wCRW PROW PERFORM Ox.111380 MES N1M¢t A¢wirtlwrn•XMA10 R.t9.0 mew[, i i DEW KZ..CMRROUS M[ TO WO OAP.M1 0[101*6 OR WIDNC ACIMR. PO H RE X10 m • /� WN1•=Os=omen CCMSIXDd PEW.m WORM ARID P[RIXIXC. PLASM IIESH TFEE PROTECTION FENCE 6 95.11 MP.M 101ECm5 BMWS 1 8 UM M MDED MCP.*DONm j DYING IIT1.10U5¢[00005 ME TO H WORD 1 R Rums m A 11.4 CO M.a CPC.MO 6 6541,010811 OC.5'PST 183E AEY3VM/FR0IELTON P6µBE RANDY KIIEN,10511000 1414(1SI I / / 11' 1 S19a 16URE DDT MP INR6CwxL 027E 1 DE PROTECTED ZDE 91854500 TO M +PN-59405 MTN ARS ENGIEERNG MO FORESTRY.EEC 1-1 i" _" �,y 11001 a M 601406 9.1 H MLOW&CD 1011 1011 IPON[RA OR 19O 1.1608 ___• 1131 X 01596 0410051011009,0 111E 10 5 R01TD "-- 1 MCR09*1 NT H MP.CR H05w ROMMCRIME ROOT ZOE II st.,-___J ran O H PHSER..4000 M PMECT 180041 0 41111 ITt 0. M 1I]. j 1�EyL OOSTIL r91fEAaA i4FS TO H MOOD 61TAR09S1 wr Nia 011.CF I➢10 aE WlF Cr M MO a ml• - - • '- A� ®115 /C�'J\ \ \ USD.¢00015 ME 10 H IUd50 1 150 x11 �1x0 Ca'C 1 M Iw.Xr 50 55 SI��jj © I �Vj� nt WH MO M iHtS tar w 005301E HMa,r n ME ND rrtla 1.1J ' 150 �V 1 _.-�1--•- ©40) 1 i+ ) Y R:M O10R \ `} 0 Et wr H HWRm O MA M . 6)1 h 1 501 05R9101HP104110 SUBYfO /x NR0eCU5 51%IQ X1114 M[RttN rAAW MR011 ERE x10RI mr a o 05 ! I Ii 1 I I r I • I I �i j : 1 i .. 34931051 DIE of Eiaiu m" 'vs ID 0.110 nE i�z Rlrmi9ATA1pNO m�q°S1wIa DRP DE I I �+ I I I I I I I I I ,//�' =�" �1•h 1 j MM/V WxN TREE MO�LIIOR TM(6'WL[NYIrK) M PoR.M FOR nAI DOWD DA.O M.X0[16 S..Nun 1 i I ro M OE,AR9 T 2.OF TREES OBE DA. DE P H 10[400 01150E a 1110.101 1114 E APOJECT BORST¢1[X4[5 110 DOOM.O LD 9114.466•REC. E .ao. --T -3�a0E.E46 �%36�1.. : %' JWf l� r � M ` _� CN11iR]F EKES 9X1 H HVEEXIm XASIYMI to Dr CIKRA IAIA 010 IRIS E R.901 H US1 70000 O..10 /_� _ �/ - 1 MS 2015 115 FIX Hrt.I. • ®10016 J9)/}eil 1+11 y- y �/ �-. y�P- I i- - F. AD0410w1 10X9146 TE N 06 4100861 wv H1YE x01101 119 -�txE1. \7J __ -L.- /{/ AV' „ .I 4 i PgRWa What S K.ARE 01456841 rm 000RED'06w.0TRT P.n..•1 1 �i / i S" AS MM.MO Dr osOr P�.a.6 x127.➢am not.'meant VIVO..ricRownoit / I I I i ( /� . E : " •�" MANN M M WP ri>a M:a 1 M Off.010 IDE 4014 SOUR Ha AT �� I I_�I IiE Mal.LK DPI 6¢�4 W M PEE. ®---`,I _I it I" I..�1." 1 � ' ..qq IEEE ' �E� ��"AA"F° .W" /V•I•`- = Y41°-;�r�� 'rW I DP COMM 9.511 H ODE m x90/90n CR 101 A NOM lw A Mw.1 A tOON L AA-�33 .L.I._ _ G:l CJ N M +h h ®_._--� 90.mnW 9[116.010 A.HMO Sr. - h C) � p �. 3 r wH m w.011 ROOTS 110R 18011 slow m Iw.Em a M EX..uE `- 1 -�� �r y,'� Ar r ODE 11011 S..010.69¢69 5¢X9605 MK M CHAMOR SI.5140 M0 001 �_rID3" 040 wEnur WEB?IDR m0rs1/E561xa..ER MH 6 Sfi-"±Yy� HS6D4C[RR MW wM M 9114 0140 165 MIC.D M 003 MO M.M ROCS! P !? (Dig------1 V06ER IWN "PACER 5.M[64[840 6 1I C �ii1Rl I , _ _ ,�' 10011 ola MO=10 ONINE PM 1.0.11 awls a ®15008 \ {^� /,x I eeO �,}; �S1r=1- , 5', � �� - 0101•114 =o w.,� � I ; I �� II� ! ; � ! ICI _ °_ 0. 610011118011107 OW 01/071 01 Me nallia ILK K2•IK MS MO BP PM MOM MIX Mal.Ma■NI Ili Fj '\ % � 60I� EM®... woe (1 r!S i ��-r-j _. aM� Mot 0010E WI101E a.•a MC 5004 �Yl ��Vl� \'`"'// I - rte.-.3.1 1'. -. w SCALE 1"-30 AR i' �i �F® 100.1.11001.0,110 MO NUM.n W Ka Y �w' r� SEE w M 000.1181 1� {�°•.-. =' .RDN_M Do. trsar w o4Ni Il�H°sw *ma M a r Aml•00 RE51SIONS: Eaor®1130 • PLAH.» SUNETNO • FOIESIA/°0°°01 art WWI. 1642 199E 5/06101 -- - U9M9 x96 Nam , �.IT 04 nS110 TIGARD SKATE o :glom amN6 1. OP.r. IE P or,¢la. PARK TREE PROTEC11ON PLAN I O�` a DR,558 100 A K ADO R�� 15.R ¢w PROW(505915-OM 9 Ka m.A1 1. RIa:3 `ARID OREGON WET EAT OKI 125-6168 T iF T - -_. 563-6.DV w - ENGINEERING PLANNING LANDSCAPE ARCHITECTURE FORESTRY SURVEYING 13910 S.W.Galbreath Dr.,Suite 100 Offices Located In: Sherwood,Oregon 97140 SHERWOOD,OREGON Phone: (503)925-8799 ENGINEERING&FORESTRY REDMOND,OREGON Fax: (503)925-8969 VANCOUVER,WASHINGTON www.aks-eng.com June 15,.2007 F Maris Buxton—Permit Coordinator City of Tigard, Oregon 13125 SW Hall Blvd. Tigard, OR 97223 Phone: 503-639-4171 Fax: 503-684-7297 RE: Required Bi-Weekly Arborist Report for Tigard Skate Park (AKS Job # 1802). Dear Maris Buxton: As a Condition of Approval,the following Bi-Weekly Arborist Report letter is to affirm that the construction activities for: Tigard Skate Park is in compliance with the approved Tree Protection and Removal Plan. On June 14, 2007,the site was visited for compliance with the Tree Protection and Removal Plan. The following is a checklist of construction activities that have been inspected inside the tree protection zone(TPZ): Compliance Violation 1- Location of tree protection fence X 2- Condition of tree protection fence is adequate X 3- Preserved trees are healthy and unharmed X 4- No dumping of material within the TPZ X 5- Roots(>1")within excavation are pruned X 6- No compaction within the TPZ X 7- No fill within the TPZ X To this date, all construction activities for the Tigard Skate Park comply with the approved Tree 1 Protection and Removal Plan. The only changes to have occurred to the plan were the parking area to the north is not part of the project and should not have been included in the tree protection plan and the tree protection fence along the south and north boundary of the project was adjusted to stop at limits of a - i the construction activity. (Attached is a revised tree protection plan). All preserved trees on site have been observed to be healthy and stable. r Please let me know if you have any questions, Very Truly Yours, CERTIFIED AKS En ' eering& Forestry,LLC. and Killen AKS RER EN Certified Arborist PN-5948A CERTIFICATE NUMBER A Certified Tree Risk Assessor# 198 EXPIRATION DATE. 12/EVZwlS ■ Arborist Disclosure Statement Arborists are tree specialists who use their education, knowledge,training,and experience to examine trees,recommend measures to enhance the health of trees, and attempt to reduce the risk of living near trees. The Client and Jurisdiction may choose to accept or disregard the recommendations of the arborist,or seek additional advice. I Arborists cannot detect every condition that could possibly lead to the structural failure of a tree. Trees are living organisms that fail in ways we do not fully understand. Conditions are often hidden within trees and below ground. Arborists cannot guarantee that a tree will be healthy or safe under all circumstances, or for a specified period of time. Likewise,remedial treatments, like medicine,cannot be guaranteed. Trees can be managed,but they cannot be controlled. To live near trees is to accept some degree of risk. The only way to eliminate all risk associated with trees is to eliminate all trees. i ENGINEERLNG PLANNING ' LANDSCAPE ARCHITECTURE FORESTRY SURVEYING 139W S.W.Galbreath Dr., Suite 100 MI Offices Located In: Sherwood,Oregon 97140 SHERWOOD,OREGON Phone:(503)925-8799 ENGINEERING FORESTRY REDMOND,OREGON Fax:(503)925-8969 VANCOUVER,WASHINGTON www.aks-eng.com July 5, 2007 Maris Buxton—Permit Coordinator City of Tigard, Oregon 13125 SW Hall Blvd. Tigard, OR 97223 Phone: 503-639-4171 Fax: 503-684-7297 RE: Required Bi-Weekly Arborist Report for Tigard Skate Park(AKS Job # 1802). Dear Marls Buxton: As a Condition of Approval,the following Bi-Weekly Arborist Report letter is to affirm that the construction activities for: Tigard Skate Park is not in compliance with the approved Tree Protection and Removal Plan. On July 5, 2007, the site was visited for compliance with the Tree Protection and Removal Plan. The following is a checklist of construction activities that have been inspected inside the tree protection zone(TPZ): Compliance Violation 1- Location of tree protection fence X 2- Condition of tree protection fence is adequate X 3- Preserved trees are healthy and unharmed X 4- No dumping of material within the TPZ X 5- Roots (>1") within excavation are pruned X 6- No compaction within the TPZ X 7- No fill within the TPZ X The tree protection fence for tree#'s 391, 392, and 393 has been altered slightly by approximately one to two feet to the north. Fill was place to an approximate depth of 12 inches in the area that is now • outside the tree protection fence,but was previously inside approved tree protection fence for tree#'s 391, 392, and 393. Tree#'s 391, 392, and 393 are London plane trees which are very tolerant of fill and construction activities. This change in the location of the tree protection fence and placing fill in the area that was originally inside the TPZ will have little if no negative impacts to these trees. The trees appears to be healthy and show no signs of stress. All preserved trees on site have been observed to be healthy and stable. Please let me know if you have any questions, Very Truly Yours, CERTIFIED monsmairr- AKS Engineyg& Forestry,LLC. 1-11 f 'IAMB Nai 4111 MIL Al NM Ill 'A IN � ■ �.: ■ GAM1111111111■MO Randy Killen ARBORIST Certified Arborist PN-5948A CERTIFICATE LENasn Certified Tree Risk Assessor# 198 EXPIRATION DATE ,L3V2008 Arborist Disclosure Statement Arborists are tree specialists who use their education, knowledge, training, and experience to examine trees, recommend measures to enhance the health of trees, and attempt to reduce the risk of living near trees. The Client and Jurisdiction may choose to accept or disregard the recommendations of the arborist, or seek additional advice. Arborists cannot detect every condition that could possibly lead to the structural failure of a tree. Trees are living organisms that fail in ways we do not fully understand. Conditions are often hidden within trees and below ground. Arborists cannot guarantee that a tree will be healthy or safe under all circumstances, or for a specified period of time. Likewise,remedial treatments, like medicine,cannot be guaranteed. Trees can be managed,but they cannot be controlled. To live near trees is to accept some degree of risk. The only way to eliminate all risk associated with trees is to eliminate all trees. ENGINEERING PLANNING { LANDSCAPE ARCHITECTURE FORESTRY SURVEYING 13910 S.W.Galbreath Dr.,Suite 100 Offices Located In: Sherwood,Oregon 97140 SHERWOOD,OREGON Phone:(503)925-8799 REDMOND,OREGON ENGINEERING&FORESTRY Fax:(503)925-8969 VANCOUVER,WASHINGTON www.aks-eng.com Jul y 27,27 2007 Maris Buxton—Permit Coordinator 1' ,. City of Tigard, Oregon 'f �' 13125 SW Hall Blvd. Tigard,OR 97223 Phone: 503-639-4171 Fax: 503-684-7297 RE: Required Bi-Weekly Arborist Report for Tigard Skate Park(AKS Job # 1802). Dear Maris Buxton: As a Condition of Approval,the following Bi-Weekly Arborist Report letter is to affirm that the construction activities for: Tigard Skate Park is not in compliance with the approved Tree Protection and Removal Plan. On July25,2007,the site was visited for compliance with the Tree Protection and Removal Plan. The following is a checklist of construction activities that have been inspected inside the tree protection zone(TPZ): Compliance Violation 1- Location of tree protection fence X 2- Condition of tree protection fence is adequate X 3- Preserved trees are healthy and unharmed X 4- No dumping of material within the TPZ X 5- Roots(>1")within excavation are pruned X 6- No compaction within the TPZ X 7- No fill within the TPZ X The tree protection fence locations for tree#'s 391, 392, 393, 1091, 1092, and 1093 has been altered slightly by approximately three feet from the approved set of construction plans. Fill was place to an approximate depth of 18 to 24 inches in the area that is now outside the tree protection fence,but was previously inside approved tree protection zone for these trees. I met with Steve Martin with the City of Tigard on July 25, 2007 to review the fill areas. Once construction of Skate Park is completed Mr. Martin's department is going to landscape the area, at that time he will ensure that the excess fill within the TPZ will be removed. Tree#'s 391, 392, and 393 are London plane trees , while tree#'s 1091, 1092, and 1093 are Sweetgum,both species of trees are very tolerant of fill and construction activities. This change in the location of the tree protection fence and placing fill in the area that was originally inside the TPZ will have little if no negative impacts to these trees. The trees appears to be healthy and show no signs of stress at this time. All preserved trees on site have been observed to be healthy and stable. Please let me know if you have any questions, Very Truly Yours, CERTIFIED AKS Engineering& Forestry LC. .T ' ` L"'" --may Air Irrarl II I i�i�ii ENGINEERING PLANNING LANDSCAPE ARCHITECTURE !I FORESTRY SURVEYING 13910 S.W.Galbreath Dr.,Suite 100 Offices Located In: Sherwood,Oregon 97140 SHERWOOD,OREGON Phone:(503)925-8799 REDMOND,OREGON ENGINEERING&FORESTRY Fax:(503)925-8969 VANCOUVER,WASHINGTON www.aks-eng.com August 10,2007 Maxis Buxton—Permit Coordinator City of Tigard, Oregon 13125 SW Hall Blvd. Tigard, OR 97223 Phone: 503-639-4171 Fax: 503-684-7297 RE: Required Bi-Weekly Arborist Report for Tigard Skate Park(AKS Job # 1802). Dear Mans Buxton: As a Condition of Approval, the following Bi-Weekly Arborist Report letter is to affirm that the construction activities for: Tigard Skate Park is in compliance with the approved Tree Protection and Removal Plan. On August 8, 2007, the site was visited for compliance with the Tree Protection and Removal Plan. The following is a checklist of construction activities that have been inspected inside the tree protection zone(TPZ): Compliance Violation 1- Location of tree protection fence X 2- Condition of tree protection fence is adequate X 3- Preserved trees are healthy and unharmed X 4- No dumping of material within the TPZ X 5- Roots(>1")within excavation are pruned X 6- No compaction within the TPZ X 7- No fill within the TPZ X The trees appear to be healthy and show no signs of stress at this time. All preserved trees on site have been observed to be healthy and stable. Please let me know if you have any questions, Very Truly Yours, rCERTIFIED mat AKS Engineering& Forestry,L . --� Ara •• �/ • _, • Randy Killen RAn.RDYORISLTEN Certified Arborist PN-5948A CERTIFICATE NUMBERPN•594,A Certified Tree Risk Assessor# 198 EXPIRATION DATE` 12/31/200' Arborist Disclosure Statement Arborists are tree specialists who use their education,knowledge, training, and experience to examine trees, recommend measures to enhance the health of trees, and attempt to reduce the risk of living near trees. The Client and Jurisdiction may choose to accept or disregard the recommendations of the arborist, or seek additional advice. Arborists cannot detect every condition that could possibly lead to the structural failure of a tree. Trees are living organisms that fail in ways we do not fully understand. Conditions are often hidden within trees and below ground. Arborists cannot guarantee that a tree will be healthy or safe under all circumstances, or for a specified period of time. Likewise, remedial treatments, like medicine, cannot be guaranteed. Trees can be managed,but they cannot be controlled. To live near trees is to accept some degree of risk. The only way to eliminate all risk associated with trees is to eliminate all trees. • ENGINEERING PLANNING LANDSCAPE ARCHITECTURE FORESTRY SURVEYING 13910 S.W.Galbreath Dr.,Suite 100 11111 Offices Located In: Sherwood,Oregon 97140 SHERWOOD,OREGON Phone:(503)925-8799 REDMOND,OREGON Fax:(503)925-8969 ENGINEERING&FORESTRY VANCOUVER,WASHINGTON '• www.aks-eng.com August 27, 2007 Maris Buxton—Permit Coordinator City of Tigard, Oregon 13125 SW Hall Blvd. Tigard,OR 97223 Phone: 503-639-4171 Fax: 503-684-7297 RE: Required Bi-Weekly Arborist Report for Tigard Skate Park(AKS Job# 1802). Dear Maris Buxton: As a Condition of Approval, the following Bi-Weekly Arborist Report letter is to affirm that the construction activities for: Tigard Skate Park ✓' is in compliance with the approved Tree Protection and Removal Plan. On August 23, 2007, the site was visited for compliance with the Tree Protection and Removal Plan. The following is a checklist of construction activities that have been inspected inside the tree protection zone(TPZ): Compliance Violation 1- Location of tree protection fence X 2- Condition of tree protection fence is adequate X 3- Preserved trees are healthy and unharmed X 4- No dumping of material within the TPZ X 5- Roots(>1")within excavation are pruned X 6- No compaction within the TPZ X 7- No fill within the TPZ X During my inspection, I found that a section of the tree protection fencing was knocked down. I informed the foreman and he re-installed it,while I was there. The trees appear to be healthy and show no signs of stress at this time. All preserved trees on site have been observed to be healthy and stable. i Please let me know if you have any questions, Very Truly Yours, CERTIFIED ' AKS Engineering& Forestry,LLC. � Jr' 1.• w - �1 w Randy Killen RANDY CTTi WI 11111■111111111MI IV I AI II ARBORIST Certified Arborist PN-5948A CERTIFICATE NUUMg RP 4SA Certified Tree Risk Assessor# 198 EXPIRATION DATE. 12/31/200S Arborist Disclosure Statement Arborists are tree specialists who use their education, knowledge, training, and experience to examine trees, recommend measures to enhance the health of trees, and attempt to reduce the risk of living near trees. The Client and Jurisdiction may choose to accept or disregard the recommendations of the arborist, or seek additional advice. Arborists cannot detect every condition that could possibly lead to the structural failure of a tree. Trees are living organisms that fail in ways we do not fully understand. Conditions are often hidden within trees and below ground. Arborists cannot guarantee that a tree will be healthy or safe under all circumstances, or for a specified period of time. Likewise,remedial treatments, like medicine, cannot be guaranteed. Trees can be managed,but they cannot be controlled. To live near trees is to accept some degree of risk. The only way to eliminate all risk associated with trees is to eliminate all trees. 9/26/2007 1 . CITY OF TIGARD 1:41:25PM 13125 SW Hall Blvd. TIGARD Tigard,OR 97223 (503)639-4171 Conditions Associated With Case#: SDR2006-00005 Project Name: TIGARD SKATE PARK # 4111111P CURRENT DATE BY BY DATE BY,N 1 REVISED WALKWAY PLAN M 5/11/2007 CAC 5/12/2007 CAC 1. Prior to site work the applicant shall submit a revised site plan for review and approval showing the walkway from the City Hall North parking lot to the sidewalk adjacent to Police headquarters marked with striping or contrasting pavement materials. 2 LANDSCAPE PLAN M 5/11/2007 CAC 5/12/2007 CAC 2. Prior to site work the applicant shall submit for review and approval a landscape plan showing the types,size and number of plantings to be installed. 3 STREET TREE PLAN N CAC 3/29/2007 MSB 3. If street trees are removed to meet site distance requirements,then street trees shall be replaced to meet the current standards,outside of the site distance line. A site plan showing the size and species of the proposed street trees shall be submitted for review and approval prior to planting. 4 PARKING SPACE PLAN M 9/7/2007 CAC 9/26/2007 CAC 4. Prior to site/building permit issuance the applicant shall provide a plan for review and approval that shows the minimum parking requirements are being met by providing an additional 17 parking spaces. These spaces shall not be further than 500 feet from the primary site(TDC 18.765.030.B). 5 BIKE RACK DETAIL M 5/11/2007 CAC 5/12/2007 CAC 5. The applicant shall provide for review and approval a detail of the bike racks to be used. 6 TREE FENCING INSTALLED&APPROVED M 6/1/2007 CAC 6/1/2007 CAC 6. Tree Protection-Prior to any site work the applicant shall install all proposed tree protection fencing. The fencing shall be inspected and approved by the Project Arborist and City Planner(Cheryl Caines)prior to commencing any site work. The tree protection fencing shall remain in place through the duration of all of the building construction phases,until the Certificate of Occupancy has been approved. 7 FINAL TREE PLAN M 6/1/2007 CAC 6/1/2007 CAC 7. Prior to issuance of building permits,the applicant shall submit site plan drawings indicating the location of the trees that were preserved on the lot during site development,location of tree protection fencing,and a signature of approval from the project arborist regarding the placement and construction techniques to be employed in building the structures. All proposed protection fencing shall be installed and inspected prior to commencing construction. The fencing shall remain in place through the duration of all of the building construction phases,until the Certificate of Occupancy has been approved. After approval from the City Forester,the tree protection measures may be removed. 8 BI-WKLY ARBORIST REPORTS N CAC 3/29/2007 MSB 8. The applicant shall have an on-going responsibility to ensure that the Project Arborist has submitted written reports to the Planning Department(Cheryl Caines),at least once every two weeks,as the Project Arborist monitors the construction activities from initial tree protection zone(TPZ)fencing installation through the building construction phases. The reports shall evaluate the condition and location of the tree protection fencing,determine if any changes occurred to the TPZ,and if any part of the Tree Protection Plan has been violated.If the amount of TPZ was reduced,then the Project Arborist shall justify why the fencing was moved and shall certify that the construction activities did not adversely impact the overall, long-term health and stability of the tree(s). If the reports are not submitted to the City at the scheduled intervals,and if it appears the TPZ's or the Tree Protection Plan are not being followed by the contractor or a sub-contractor,the City can stop work on the project until an inspection can be done by City Staff and the Project Arborist. Prior to issuance of any Certificates of Occupancy,the Project Arborist will submit a final certification indicating the elements of the Tree Protection Plan were followed and that all remaining trees on the site are healthy,stable,and viable in their modified growing environment. 9 MEET VISUAL CLEAR REQ/HALL BLVD M 4/20/2007 CAC 4/20/2007 CAC 9. When Hall Boulevard is widened,the current visual clearance requirements shall be met unless a Site Distance Certification is provided that shows the site distance requirements can be met. 10 PFI REQUIRED M 5/14/2007 KSM 5/14/2007 KSM 10. A Public Facility Improvement(PFI)permit is required for this project to cover driveway improvements on Burnham Ping-CaseConditions.tpt Page 1 of 3 CheryliCaines- Fwd: FW: Itr re:_arking condition Page 1 From: Cheryl Caines To: Buxton, Maris; Plaza, Daniel Date: 9/7/2007 4:33:41 PM Subject: Fwd: FW: IV re: parking condition Dan, After realizing we had counted Town Hall twice in the parking calculations the number of spaces needed went down to 11. Once the Niche lot was expanded and striped we gained an additional 6 spaces. Based on Brian's modification request you will lose 4. Putting you at a net gain of 2 spaces. (Down to 9 spaces). The library needed 15 City Hall spaces, but the library parking lot has been expanded by an additional 20 spaces. Therefore there should be a surplus of 4 spaces. Conditon #4 can be signed off. Cheryl >>> Daniel Plaza 09/06 3:53 PM >>> I believe the attached flow of emails satisfy's condition #4 Tom Coffee's approval is in the sequence of emails dated 5/7/07 at 4:01 PM let me know if you think differently Thanks Dan Plaza Parks and Facilities Manager City of Tigard 503 718 2590 daniel�tigard-or.gov Remember: If You Think You Can, or You Think You Can't, You're Right AND Use- SD2cO( -s LANCASTER engineering October 1,2007 Troy Mears SR Design 8196 SW Hall Boulevard, Suite 232 Beaverton, OR 97008 RE: Tigard Skate Park Final Intersection Sight Distance Measurement Dear Troy: This letter is written to serve as the final sight distance certification for the subject site access to Hall Boulevard. In our previous sight distance letter dated October 2, 2006,the inter- section sight distance was documented to be 280 feet. Based on the 30 mph posted speed,the requirement is 335 feet. It was explained in that letter,then again in more detail in a May 8, 2007 addendum, that intersection sight distance could be improved only marginally by clearing street trees and landscaping along the Hall Boulevard site frontage. This landscaping is impor- tant to the aesthetics of the site,and even with the clearing,the required 335 feet could not be met. Both the October 2,2006 and May 8,2007 letters demonstrated that while intersection sight distance standards are not met,there is adequate stopping sight distance,which is the min- imum requirement for safety. Given the availability of stopping sight distance,the importance of the landscaping along the Hall Boulevard frontage, and what would be a marginal improve- ment to intersection sight distance if the landscaping were removed,the sight distance was ap- proved based on the available stopping sight distance. As a result,no modifications were made to the site driveway and its lines of sight. The current sight distance is unchanged from the previous letters. Yours truly, Todd E. Mobley,P ,PTOE Principal 321 SW 4th Avenue,Suite 400•Portland,OR 97204•Phone 503.248.0313•Fax 503.248.9251 _ 6OOQ5 ENGINEERING PLANNING LANDSCAPE ARCHITECTURE FORESTRY SURVEYING 13910 S.W.Galbreath Dr.,Suite 100 1.11 Offices Located In: Sherwood,Oregon 97140 SHERWOOD,OREGON Phone:(503)925-8799 REDMOND,OREGON ENGINEERING&FORESTRY Fax:(503)925-8969 1 VANCOUVER,WASHINGTON www.aks-eng.com October 18,2007 Cheryl Caines—Assistant Planner City of Tigard, Oregon 13125 SW Hall Blvd. Tigard, OR 97223 Phone: 503-639-4171 Fax: 503-684-7297 RE: Follow up to the Final Arborist Assessment for the Tigard Skate Park(AKS Job # 1802). Dear Ms. Caines: The purpose of this letter is to follow up on the construction activities of the retaining wall for the tree wells and the subsurface"French drain",which were not completed as outlined in the final arborist report for the Tigard Skate Park dated October 8, 2007. On October 17, 2007 I visited the site and verified that the retaining wall for the tree wells and the "French drain"were installed in the locations that I recommended to Steve Martin(Supervisor of the Park and Recreation Department for the City of Tigard). The location of these structures disturbed a minimal area of each tree's root zone and caused little to no lasting damage to the trees. The remaining construction activities for this project are the proposed path(to be constructed by the boy scouts) and the landscaping. Both activities are proposed to be located outside the trees root zones. In closing, all the trees on site appear to be healthy and vigorous with no signs of stress due to construction of the skate park. Please Iet me know if you have any questions, Very Truly Yours CERTIFIED , AKS Engineering& Forestry,LLC. , I 7E4, ARBORIST Randy Killen f' RANDY KILLEN Certified Arborist PN-5948A CERTIFICATE NUMBER PN-S948A Certified Tree Risk Assessor# 198 EXPIRATION DATE: 17/3112008 r Arborist Disclosure Statement Arborists are tree specialists who use their education, knowledge,training, and experience to examine trees,recommend measures to enhance the health of trees, and attempt to reduce the risk of living near trees. The Client and Jurisdiction may choose to accept or disregard the recommendations of the arborist, or seek additional advice. Arborists cannot detect every condition that could possibly lead to the structural failure of a tree. Trees are living organisms that fail in ways we do not fully understand. Conditions are often hidden within trees and below ground. Arborists cannot guarantee that a tree will be healthy or safe under all circumstances, or for a specified period of time. Likewise, remedial treatments, like medicine,cannot be guaranteed. Trees can be managed,but they cannot be controlled. To live near trees is to accept some degree of risk. The only way to eliminate all risk associated with trees is to eliminate all trees.