Loading...
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.
SDR2006-00008
SDR2006 00008 PAUL SCHATZ FURNITURE MAJOR MODIFICATION Y NOTICE OF TYPE II DECISION II SITE DEVELOPMENT REVIEW(SDR) 2006-00008 PAUL SCHATZ FURNITURE MAJOR MODIFICATION T IGAR = (Includes a 30-day extension) 120 DAYS = 5/14/2007 SECTION I. APPLICATION SUMMARY FILE NAME: PAUL SCHATZ FURNITURE MAJOR MODIFICATION CASE NOS.: Site Development Review(SDR) SDR2006-00008 Variance (VAR) VAR2006-00086 PROPOSAL: The applicant is requesting Site Development Review approval to construct a 4,746 square foot addition to an existing commercial building and to modify the parking areas and drive aisles. A Variance has also been requested to reduce the access width from 50 feet with 40 feet of pavement to 37 feet with 30 feet of pavement. OWNER PACA Properties,LLC 6600 SW Bonita Rd. Tigard,OR 97224 APPLICANT: Mildren Design Group,P.0 Attn: Gene Mildren 7650 SW Beveland St.,Suite 120 Tigard,OR 97223 LOCATION: 6600 SW Bonita Road;WCTM 2S112AD,Tax Lot 1100. ZONE: I-P: Industrial Park District. The I-P zoning district provides appropriate locations for combining light manufacturing office and small scale commercial uses, e.g., restaurants,personal services and fitness centers, in a campus-like setting. Only those light industnal uses with no off-site impacts, e.g., noise glare, odor, vibration are permitted in the I-P zone. In addition to mandatory site development review, design and development standards in the I-P zone have been adopted to insure that developments will be well-integrated,attractively landscaped,and pedestrian-friendly. APPLICABLE REVIEW CRITERIA: Community Development Code Chapters 18.360, 18.370, 18.390, 18.530, 18.705, 18.725, 18.745, 18.755, 18.765, 18.780, 18.790, 18.795 and 18.810. SECTION II. DECISION Notice is hereby iven that the City of Tigard Community Development Director's designee has APPROVED the above request subject to certain conditions of approval. The findings and conclusions on which the decision is based are noted in Section VI. NOTICE OF TYPE II DEQSION SDR2006-00008/PAUL SCHATZ MAJOR MODIFICATION PAGE 1 OF 24 CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL THE FOLLOWING CONDITIONS SHALL BE SATISFIED PRIOR TO THE ISSUANCE OF SITE/BUILDING PERMITS: Submit to the Planning Division(Cheryl Caines, 639-4171, ext. 2437) for review and approval: 1. Prior to site work the applicant must submit a revised landscape plan for review and approval that shows street trees along SW Bonita Road as 3 inch caliper per 18.530.050.B. 2. Prior to commencing site work, the applicant shall pay a mitigation fee-in-lieu for the value of 2625 caliper inches (26.25 x$125=$3,281.25). 3. Tree Protection- Prior to any site work the applicant shall install all proposed tree protection fencing. The fencing shall be inspected and approvedbythe Project Arborist and City Planner, Cheryl Caines, prior to commencing any site work The tree protection fencing shall remain in place through the duration of all of the building construction phases, until the Certificate of Occupancy has been approved. 4. Prior to issuance of building permits, the applicant shall submit site plan drawings indicating the location of the trees that were preserved on the lot during site development, location of tree protection fencing,.and a signature of approval from the project arborist regarding the placement and construction techniques to be employed-in building the structures. All proposed protection fencing shall be installed and inspected pnor to commencing construction. The fencing shall remain in place through the duration of all of the building construction phases,until the Certificate of Occupancy has been approved. After approval from City Staff,the tree protection measures may be removed. 5. Prior to building permit issuance,the applicant shall provide documentation of an adequate on-going maintenance program for the landscape areas. 6. Submit a detailed plan for review and approval that shows all new service facilities including air conditioning units,HVAC,and gas meters,are screened from public view. 7. Submit detailed plans for review and approval that shows the location of the two small dumpsters used for trash collection. If screening is required,it must be shown on the plans. 8. Prior to issuance of building/site ermits, the applicant shall submit plans for review and approval that show the direction of flow and- ignage details for the one-way access drive. 9. Prior to issuance of building/site permits,the applicant shall submit information stating the number of long-term parking spaces-being provided. If this number exceeds 20,then a revised site plan must be submitted for review and approval that shows how the carpool/vanpool parking standards are met. 10. Provide a detail of the bike racks to be used for review and approval by the City. 11. Prior to any.Certificates of Occupancy, the applicant shall ensure that the Project Arborist has submitted written reports to the Planning Department (Cheryl Gaines),at least,once every two weeks, from initial tree protection zone (TPZ) fencing installation, ugh the building construction phases, as he monitors the construction activities anc progress. This inspection will be to evaluate the tree protection fencing, determine if the fencing was moved at any point during construction, and determine if any part of the Tree Protection Plan has been violated. These reports must be provided to the City until the time of the issuance of any Certificates of Occupancy. The reports shall include any changes that occurred to the TPZ as well as the condition and location of the tree protection fencing. If the amount of TPZ was reduced then the Project Arborist shall justify why the fencing was moved, and shall certify that the construction activities to the trees did not adversely impact the overall,long-term health and stability of the tree(s). NOTICE OF TYPE II DECISION SDR2006-00008/PAUL SCHATZ MAJOR MODIFICATION PAGE 2 OF 24 If the reports are not submitted or received by the City Planner at the scheduled intervals, and if it appears the TPZ's or the Tree Protection Plan are not being followed by the contractor or a sub- contractor, the City can stop work on the roject until an inspection can be done by City Staff and the Project Arbonst. Prior to issuance of any Certificates of Occupancy, the Project Arborist will submit a final certification indicating the elements of the Tree Protection Plan were followed and that all remaining trees on the site are healthy, stable and viable in their modified growing environment. Submit to the Engineering Department (Kim McMillan, 639-4171, ext. 2642) for review and approval: 12. Prior to issuance of a site permit a Public Facility Improvement (P permit is required for this project to cover connection to tie public sewer. Three (3) sets of detailed public rovement plans shall be submitted for review to the Engineering Department. NOTE: these are in addition to any drawings required by the Building Division and should only include sheets relevant to public improvements. Public Facility Improvement (PH) permit plans shall conform to City of Tigard Public Improvement Design Standards, which are available at City Hall and the City's web page (www.tigard or.gov). 13. The PFI permit plan submittal shall include the exact legal name, address and telephone number of the individual or corporate entity who will be designated as the "Pennittee", and who will provide the financial assurance for the public improvements. For example, specify if the entity is a corporation limited partnership, LLC, etc. Also specify the state withm which the entity is incorporated and provide the name of the corporate contact person.. Failure to provide accurate information to the Engineering Department will delay processing of project documents. 14. Prior to issuance of the Site Permit, the applicant shall obtain a permit from the State of Oregon sHighway Division, to perform work within the right-of-way of Bonita Road. A copy of the permit hall be provided to the City Engineering Department. 15. Prior to issuance of the Site Permit,the applicant shall pay the addressing fee. (STAFF CONTACT: Bethany Stewart,Engineering). 16. Prior to issuance of the Site Permit, the applicant's engineer shall provide preliminary sight distance certification for the driveway at Sequoia Parkway,with a list of improvements,if required to meet the minimum sight distance. 17. The applicant shall submit construction plans to ODOT for an ODOT Miscellaneous Permit, indicating that they will construct the following frontage improvements along SW Bonita Road as a part of this project: A 6-foot concrete sidewalk,curb-tight;and B. street trees behind the sidewalk spaced per TDC requirements. 18. The applicant shall submit construction plans to ODOT for an ODOT Miscellaneous Permit, indicating that they will construct the following frontage improvements along SW Bonita Road as a part of this project: A 6-foot concrete sidewalk, curb-tight, that extends from the west end of their frontage to the curb return at Sequoia Parkway and Bonita Road. 19. Final design plans and calculations for the pro osed private water quality facility shall be submitted to the Engineering Department (Kim McM7han) as a part of the Public Facility Improvement (PH) permit plans. Included with the plans shall be a proposed landscape plan and maintenance plan. 20. An erosion control plan shall be provided as part of the Site Permit drawings. The plan shall conform to the "Erosion Prevention and Sediment Control Design and Planning Manual, February 2003 edition." NOTICE OF TYPE II DECISION SDR2006-00008/PAUL SC}IATZ MAJOR MODIFICATION PAGE 3 OF 24 21. The applicant shall submit a letter of approval from TVFR for the site layout, fire hydrant placement and fire sprinkler requirements prior to issuance of the Site permit. THE FOLLOWING CONDITIONS SHALL BE SATISFIED PRIOR TO FINAL BUILDING INSPECTION: Submit to the Planning Division(Cheryl Caines,639-4171,ext. 2437) for review and approval: 22. Prior to issuance of any.Certificates of Occupancy,the applicant/owner shall record a deed restriction to the effect that any existing tree.greater than 12 diameter maybe removed only if the tree dies or is hazardous according to a certified arborist. The deed restriction may be removed or will be considered invalid iFa tree preserved in accordance with this decision should either die or be removed as a hazardous tree. Submit to the Engineering Department (Kim McMillan, 639-4171, ext. 2642) for review and approval: 23. Prior to a final building inspection, the applicant shall complete any work in the public right-of-way and submit written approval from ODOT to the Engineering Department. 24. The applicant shall provide signage at the entrance of each shared flag lot driveway or private street that lists the addresses that are served by the given driveway or street. 25. Prior to a final building inspection,the applicant shall pay$1,642.50 to the City for the striping of the bike lane along the frontage of Bonita Road or provide the striping. 26. The applicant shall either place the existing overhead utility lines along SW Bonita underground as a part a this project, or they shall pay the fee in-lieu of undergrounding. The fee may be allowed if approved by the City Engineer. The fee shall be calculated by the frontage of the site that is parallel to the utility lines and will be $35.00 per lineal foot. If the fee option is approved by the City Engineer, the amount will be$14,735.00 and it shall be paid prior to final building inspection. 27. Prior to a final building inspection, the applicant shall demonstrate that they have entered into a maintenance agreement with Stormwater Managemen or another company that demonstrates they can meet the maintenance requirements of the manufacturer, for the proposed onsite storm water treatment facility. 28. Prior to a final building inspection, the applicant's engineer shall submit a final sight distance certification for the intersection of the driveway and Sequoia Parkway. THIS APPROVAL SHALL BE VALID FOR EIGHTEEN (18) MONTHS FROM THE EFFECTIVE DATE OF THIS DECISION. SECTION III. BACKGROUND INFORMATION Site History. Staff conducted a search of City records for the subject property and found a two lot minor land partition approved in 1999 (M P1999-00025). No other cases were found specific to this site. Vicinity Information: The subject site is located adjacent to Interstate 5 and south of Bonita Rd. The property is zoned I-P with (properties to the south and west also zoned I-P. Properties on the north side of Bonita Road are zoned I-L Light Industrial). The adjacent properties are developed with other bulk sales retail uses. NOTICE OF TYPE II DECISION SDR200600008/PAUL SCHATZ MAJOR MODIFICATION PAGE 4 OF 24 Site Information and Proposal Description: The applicant is requesting Site Development Review for a 4,746 square foot addition to the existing building on an approximately 2.9 acre site. The addition will be used for general retail use,while the existing floor area will continue to be used for bulk sales and associated storage. Dither proposed changes are to the parking area and access aisles. The parking is being increased,landscaping decreased and a one-way access aisle is being added along the south side of the building. In addition, the applicant is requesting an adjustment to the access standards to reduce the access width from 50 feet with 4D feet of pavement to 37 feet with 30 feet of pavement. SECTION IV. COMMENTS FROM PROPERTY OWNERS WITHIN 500 FEET One comment letter was received from Mr. Mark McGirr Executive Director of Administration and Treasurer of Atiyeh Brothers. Atiyeh Brothers owns the parcel directly west of the Paul Schatz development. Mr. McGirr has concerns about the developments effects on a Reciprocal Access and Exclusive Parking Easement between the two properties. The copy of the agreement was found in the Minor Land Partition file (MLP1999-00025) related to create the two properties,but this copy had not been signed or recorded. In a phone conversation with Mr. McGirr he identified the problem to be with the current design. A landscape island and parking at the northwest corner of the development are being extended into the easement area and trucks trying to reach the Atiyeh Brother's loading docks may not be able to make the turn into the access aisle. A meeting between the two parties was scheduled for January 30,2007 in hopes of reaching an agreement on the design. After the meeting the landscapirig� and parking within the easement was re-designed and revised plans were submitted February 16, 2007. These revisions are acceptable to Atiyeh Brothers. A copy of an e-mail from Mr.McGirr accepting the revisions was submitted along with the revised plans. SECTION V. SUMMARY OF APPLICABLE REVIEW CRITERIA The proposal's consistency with these Code Chapters is reviewed in the following sections: A. Variances and Adjustments 18.370 B. Zoning Districts 18.530 Industrial Zoning Districts C. Applicable Development Code Standards 18.705 Access Egress and Circulation 18.725 Environmental Performance Standards 18.745 Landscaping and Screening 18.755 Mixed SolidAVaste and Recyclable Storage 18.765 Off-Street parking and loading requirements 18.780 Signs 18.790 Tree Removal 18.795 Visual Clearance D. Specific SDR Approval Criteria 18.360 E. Street and Utility Improvement Standards 18.810 F. Decision Making Procedures 18.390 Impact Study NOTICE OF TYPE II DECISION SDR2006-00008/PAUL SCHATZ MAJOR MODIFICATION PAGE 5 OF 24 SECTION VI. APPLICABLE DEVELOPMENT CODE STANDARDS A. VARIANCES AND ADJUSTMENTS: Section 18.370.020.C.5.a provides that in all zoning districts where access and egress drives cannot be readily designed to conform to Code standards within a particular parcel, access with an adjoining property shall be considered. If access in conjunction with another parcel cannot reasonably be achieved, the Director may grant an adjustment to the access requirements of Chapter 18.705 through a Type II procedure, as governed in Section 18.390.030,using approval criteria contained in Subsection 5.b below. The applicant has requested a variance to 18.705.030.J: Minimum access requirements for commercial and industrial use. Table 18.7053 shows that the minimum access width for a development with 100 or more parking spaces is either two 30-foot accesses with 24 feet of pavement and curbs or one 50-foot access with 40 feet of pavement and curbs. The applicant has requested to allow the one existing_access,which is 37 feet wide with 30 feet of pavement,satisfy this requirement. The additional pavement and curbs cannot be added because the access flag abuts right-of-way and another development. No other access oints are possible due to surrounding development to the south and west and I-5-to the east. The site has frontage on Bonita Road,but the grade is too steep to construct an access. The Director may approve, approve with condition, or deny a request for an adjustment from the access requirement contained in Chapter 18.705,based on the following criteria: It is not possible to share access. The site already shares access with the property to the west onto Sequoia Parkway. No other shared access points are possible. There are no other alternative access points on the street in question or from another street. As stated above, there are no possible access points. The existing access is through an access drive shared with properties to the west connecting with Sequoia Parkway. Interstate 5 lies to the east of the site and other developed properties border along the west and south. The access separation requirements cannot be met. The access separation requirements are not applicable because the access does not actually connect with the street(Sequoia Parkway). The applicant is not requesting an adjustment to the separation standards. The request is the minimum adjustment required to provide adequate access. The existing access width is 37 feet and is bordered by right-of-way and an existing development. The necessary pavement and curbing to meet current standards cannot be installed. Given these factors, the request is fhe minimum adjustment required to provide adequate access. The approved access or access approved with conditions will result in a safe access;and The existing access is wide enough to provide two-way traffic and this access has been adequate access in the past. The minimum requirement for two-way traffic is 24 feet of pavement and the access has 30 feet. A site distance certification has been conditioned by Kim McMillan, the city's Development Review Engineer. This will be for the shared access intersection with Sequoia Parkway,which is off-site. The visual clearance requirement of Chapter 18.795 will be met. The accessway is extended across neighboring developments within the public right-of-way. The intersection of the property line and the right-of-way is not the actual intersection of tie access and public street. Therefore,visual clearance is not applicable. NOTICE OF TYPE II DECISION SDR2006-00008/PAUL SCHATZ MAJOR MODIFICATION PAGE 6 OF 24 B. ZONING DISTRICTS Industrial Zoning District: Section 18.530.020 Lists the description of the Industrial Zoning Districts. The site is located in the I-P: Industrial Park zoning district. The proposed addition will be sales oriented retail, which is restricted use in the zone. These limited uses, separately or in combination, may not exceed 20% of the entire square footage within a development complex. No retail uses shall exceed 60,000 square feet of gross leasable area per building or business. Total square footage of the building will be 44,491 square feet,including the 4,746 scuare foot addition for sales oriented retail. Thus both the 20% and 60,000 square- foot restrictions are met. The present use of the site is a bulk retail sales. Development Standards: Section 18.530.040.B States that development standards in industrial zoning districts are contained in Table 18.530.2 below: TABLE 18.530.2 DEVELOPMENT STANDARDS IN INDUSTRIAL ZONES STANDARD I-P Proposed Minimum Lot Size None 127,123 sq ft Minimum Lot Width 50 ft 240 ft[1] Minimum Setbacks -Front yard 35 ft 93 ft - Side facing street on corner&through lots 20 ft N/A -Side yard 0/50 ft 25 ft/70 ft -Rear yard 0/50 ft 28 ft - Distance between front of garage &property line abutting a public or private - - street. Maximum Height 45 ft 39 ft. Maximum Site Coverage 75% 80% Minimum Landscape Requirement 25% 20% [I]This measurement is taken within the existing building pad area. As demonstrated in the table above,the proposal complies with the underlying zone development standards. With the exception of lot size, the proposed measurements above are taken from the plans provided. The minimum setback is zero unless abutting a residential zone. This site is surrounded by industrial zoning and therefore rear and side yard setbacks are not applicable. The proposed site coverage is above the 75% maximum,but maximum site coverage may be increased to 80%if the provisions of Section 18.530.050.B are satisfied. 18.530.050.B. states that lot coverage may be increased from 75% to 80% as part of the site development review process,providing the following requirements are satisfied: (1) The minimum landscaping requirement shall be 20% of the site. The proposed landscaping covers 20% of the site. (approximately 25,447 square feet). (2) The applicant shall meet the following performance standards with regard to the landscaping plan approved as part of the site development review process: a. Street trees, as required by Section 18.745.040.0.1 are to be installed with a minimum caliper of three inches rather than the two inches as measured at four feet in height; b. The landscaping between a parking lot and street property line shall have a minimum width of 10 feet; c. All applicable bufferin , screening and setback requirements contained in Section 18.745.050 shall be satisfied. d. The applicant shall provide documentation of an adequate on-going maintenance program to ensure appropriate irrigation and maintenance of the landscape area. NOTICE OF TYPE II DECISION SDR2006.00008/PAUL SCHATZ MAJOR MODIFICATION PAGE 7 OF 24 The applicant's landscape plan shows 2 inch Karpick Red Maples for street trees along Bonita Road. The applicant requests in the revised narrative that three inch caliper street trees be required as a condition of approval. This same lan also shows a landscape strip between the streets (Bonita Rd. and I-5) and parking area that is over 10 feet in width. All buffering and screening.requirements are met and discussed below under the Landscaping and Screening section. No on-going maintenance program has been proposed. The applicant has stated that a maintenance contract can be provided and requests a condition of approval to meet the standard. FINDING: Based on the analysis above,the underlying zoning district standards have not been fully met, however,if the applicant complies with the conditions listed below,the standards will be fully met. CONDITIONS: • Prior to site work the applicant must submit a revised landscape lan for review and approval that shows street trees along SW Bonita Road as -3 inch caliper per 18.530.050.B. • Prior to building permit issuance, the applicant shall provide documentation of an adequate on-going maintenance program for the landscape areas. C. APPLICABLE DEVELOPMENT CODE STANDARDS Access,Egress and Circulation(18.705): Walkways: 18.705.030(F) requires that on-site pedestrian walkways comply with the following standards: Walkways shall extend from the ground floor entrances or from the ground floor landing of stairs, ramps, or elevators of all commercial, institutional, and industrial uses,to the streets which provide the required access and egress. Walkways shall provide convenient connections between buildings in multi-building commercial, institutional, and industrial complexes. Unless impractical, walkways shall be constructed between new and existing developments and neighboring developments; The site plan shows sidewalks leading from the building entrances and connecting with a sidewalk on the neighboring property to the east. This sidewalk leads to the right-of-way. This standard is met. Wherever required walkways cross vehicle access driveways or parking lots, such crossings shall be designed and located for pedestrian safety. Required walkways shall be physically separated from motor vehicle traffic and parking by either a minimum 6-inch vertical separation(curbed ) or a minimum 3-foot horizontal separation, except that pedestrian crossings of traffic aisles are permitted for distances no greater than 36 feet it-appropriate landscaping, pavement markings or contrasting pavement materials are used. Walkways shall be a minimum of four feet in width exclusive of vehicle overhangs and obstructions such as mailboxes, benches, bicycle racks, and sign posts, and shall be in compliance with ADA standards; All sidewalks on site are six feet wide and have curbs for separation from the parking areas. To connect the sidewalk on the Paul Schatz site with those to the west, the walkway must cross an access drive. This crossing is marked with striping (shown on site plan). Required walkways shall be paved with hard surfaced materials such as concrete, asphalt, stone, brick, etc. Walkways may be required to be lighted and/or signed as needed for safety purposes. Soft-surfaced public use pathways may be provided only if such pathways are provided in addition to required pathways. All existing and proposed sidewalks are concrete. Existing and new lights are shown on the site plan spaced throughout the parking areas. This standard is met. Access Management: Section 18.705.030.H.1 states that an access report shall be submitted with all new development proposals which verifies design of driveways and streets are safe by meeting adequate stacking needs, sight distance and deceleration standards as set by ODOT, Washington County, the City and AASHTO . NOTICE OF TYPE II DEQSION SDR2006-00008/PAUL SC3ATZ MAJOR MODIFICATION PAGE 8 OF 24 The applicant did not address this section of the code. The applicant shares the driveway with several properties. While the driveway is located within the public right-of-way(ROW) the driveway does intersect Sequoia Parkway. To ensure cars can safely exit the shared driveway,the applicant's engineer shall submit a preliminary sight distance certification for the intersection of the driveway with Sequoia Parkway with a list of improvements, if required, to achieve the required minimum sight distance. If there are improvements required, i.e. trimming of trees and shrubs, the applicant shall coordinate that work with the property owner(s).The engineer shall submit a final sight distance certification prior to a final building inspection. Section 18.705.030.H.2 states that driveways shall not be permitted to be placed in the influence area of collector or arterial street intersections. Influence area of intersections is that area where queues of traffic commonly form on approach to an intersection. The minimum driveway setback from a collector or arterial street intersection shall be 150 feet, measured from the right-of-way line of the intersecting street to the throat of the proposed driveway. The setback may be reater depending upon the influence area, as determined from City Engineer review of a traffic impact report submitted by the applicant's traffic engineer. In a case where a project has less than 150 feet of street frontage, the applicant must explore any option for shared access with the adjacent parcel. If shared access is not possible or practical,the driveway shall be placed as far from the intersection as possible. The applicant did not address this code section. This driveway is unusual in its placement in that it cannot be measured as described above because it is wholly within the ROW. There are no opportunities to move it further away from the intersection of Bonita Road,a Collector,and Sequoia Parkway. FINDING: The access requirements have been met. Environmental performance standards (18.725): These standards require that federal and state environmental laws, rules and regulations be applied to development within the City of Tigard. Section 18.725.030 (Performance Standards) regulates: Noise,visible emissions,vibration and odors. Noise. For the purposes of noise regulation, the provisions of Sections 7.41.130 through 7.40.210 of the Tigard Municipal Code shall apply. Visible Emissions. Within the commercial zoning districts and the industrial park (IP) zoning district, there shall be no use, operation or activity which results in a stack or other point- source emission, other than an emission from space heating, or the emission of pure uncombined water (steam) which is visible from a property line.Department of Environmental Quality(DEQ) rules for visible emissions (340-21-015 and 3 0-28-070) apply. Vibration. No vibration other than that caused by highway vehicles, trains and aircraft is permitted in any given zoning district which is discernible without instruments at the property line of the use concerned. Odors. The emissions of odorous gases or other matter in such quantities as to be readily detectable at any point beyond the property hne of the use creating the odors is prohibited.DEQ rules for odors (340-028-090) apply. Glare and heat. No direct or sky reflected glare, whether from floodlights or from high temperature processes such as combustion or welding, which is visible at the lot line shall be permitted, and; 1) there shall be no emission or transmission of heat or heated air which is discernible at the lot line of the source; and 2) these regulations shall not apply to signs or floodlights in parking areas or construction equipment at the time of construction or excavation work otherwise permitted by this title. Insects and rodents. All materials including wastes shall be stored and all grounds shall be maintained in a manner which will not attract or aid the propagation of insects or rodents or create a health hazard. NOTICE OF TYPE II DECISION SDR2006-00008/PAUL SCHATZ MAJOR MODIFICATION PAGE 9 OF 24 The proposal is to add a small amount of sales oriented retail to an existing bulk sales use. Both of these uses are permitted within the I-P zone. The applicant has not indicated that the above standards will be met; however, based on the provision of adequate trash and recycling area, and the fact that the proposed use is not likely to generate noise, visible emissions, odors, glare and heat, or harbor insects and rodents, this standard is satis}ied. As stated above this is an addition to an existing development,which has had no problems meeting these standards in the past. Ongoing maintenance to meet these standards shall be maintained and any violation of these standards will be addressed by the City of Tigard's' Code Enforcement Officer. FINDING: The Environmental Performance Standards are met. Landscaping and Screening(18.745): Street Trees: Section 18.745.040 states that all development projects fronting on a public street or a private drive more than 100 feet in length shall be required to plant street trees in accordance with Section 18.745.040.0 Section 18.745.040.0 requires that street trees be spaced between 20 and 40 feet apart depending on the size classification of the tree at maturity(small,medium or large). The applicant has shown Red Maples to be planted as street trees along Bonita Road. The plan shows 2 inch trees,but the applicant has noted in the narrative that 3 inch trees will be planted to meet the increased site coverage standards addressed above under Industrial Zoning Districts. Buffering and Screening: Section 18.745.080 states that no buffer is required between abutting uses that are of a different type when the uses are separated by a street No buffer is required between a proposed office use and existing office use. Buffering and/or screening are required for dissimilar uses. To the north and east are Interstate 5 and Bonita Road. To the west and south are existing retail businesses. Similar uses do not require buffering or screening. This standard has been met. Screening: Special Vrovisions: Section 18.745.050.E requires the screening of parking and loading areas. Landscaped parking areas shall include special design features which effectively screen the parking lot areas from view. Planting materials to be installed should achieve a relative balance between low lying and vertical shrubbery and trees. Trees shall be planted in landscaped islands in all parking areas, and shall be equally distributed on the basis of one (1) tree for each seven(7) parkin spaces in order to provide a canopy effect The minimum dimension on the landscape islands shall be three (3) feet wide and the landscaping shall be protected from vehicular damage by some form of wheel guard or curb. The site lies below grades of the two adjacent right-of-ways and therefore screening with plant material is not as effective. Re ardless the applicant has proposed adding a mix of trees and shrubs to existing landscaping. For the new parking area in the SE corner of the site,trees and tall shrubs are proposed. This area abuts the back side of the Home Depot building and is not generally seen off-site by the general public. This standard has been met. Screenin Of Service Facilities. Except for one-family and two-family dwellings, any refuse container or disposal area and service facilities such as gas meters and air conditioners which would otherwise be visible from a public street, customer or resident parking area, any public facility or any residential area shall be screened from view by placement of a solid wood fence or masonry wall between five and eight feet in height All refuse materials shall be contained within the screened area; There is inadequate information provided in the lans to establish whether this standard is met. Therefore, the applicant will be required to submit detailed plans for Planning Division review prior to issuance of a building permit that shows any new service facilities including air conditioners and gas meters screened from view. NOTICE OF TYPE II DEQSION SDR2006-00008/PAUL SCHATZ MAJOR MODIFICATION PAGE 10 OF 24 Screening Of Refuse Containers. Except for one- and two-family dwellings, any refuse container or refuse collection area which would be visible from a public street, parking lot, residential or commercial area, or any public facility such as a school or park shall be screened or enclosed from view by placement of a solid wood fence, masonry wall or evergreen hedge. All refuse shall be contained within the screened area. Paul Schatz furniture generates a small amount of waste. The applicant stated in an e-mail that the business utilizes two small dumpsters that are located near a landscape island and the loading docks. A revised site plan must be provided to show the exact location. It cannot be determined at this time if screening is necessary. The decision has been conditioned to ensure this standard is met. FINDING: Based on the analysis above,the landscaping and screening standards have not been fully met. If the applicant complies with the conditions listed below,the standards will be met. CONDITIONS: Submit detailed plans for review and approval that shows all new service facilities including air conditioning units, HVAC, and gas meters, are screened from public view. Submit detailed plans for review and approval that shows the location of the two small dumpsters used for trash collection. If screening is required, it must be shown on the plans. Off-Street Parking and Loading(18.765): Location of vehicle parking: Off-street parking spaces for single-family and duplex dwellings and single-family attached dwellings shall be located on the same lot with the dwellings. Oft street parking lots for uses not listed above shall be located not further than 200 feet from the building or use that they are required to serve, measured in a straight line from the building with the following exceptions: a) commercial and industrial uses which require more than 40 parking spaces may provide for the spaces in excess of the required first 40 spaces up to a distance of 300 feet from the primary site; The 40 parking spaces which remain on the primary site must be available for users in the following order of priority: 1) Disabled-accessible spaces; 2) Short-term spaces; 3) Long-teen preferential carpool and vanpool spaces; 4) Long-term spaces. The parking lots associated with this project are directly adjacent to the proposed building, in compliance with this standard. Joint Parking: Owners of two or more uses, structures or parcels of land may agree to utilize jointly the same fparking and loading spaces when the peak hours of operation do not overlay, subject to the ollowing: 1) The size of the joint parking facility shall be at least as large as the number of vehicle parking spaces required by the larger(est) use per Section 18.765.070; 2) Satisfactory legal evidence shall be presented to the Director in the form of deeds, leases or contracts to establish the joint use; 3) If a joint use arrangement is subsequently terminated, or if the uses change, the requirements of this title thereafter apply to each separately. Joint parking is not proposed with this application, but the site configuration in relation to the property to the west makes the parking on each site appear as a shared parking area. The applicant is able to meet the minimum off-street parking requirements without the off-site parg. A joint parking agreement is not necessary. There is a Reciprocal Access and Exclusive Parking Easement Agreement between the two fproperties,but a copy was not provided with this application. A copy was found in the Minor Land Partition ile (ML.P1999-00025) to divide the property into two parcels. NOTICE OF TYPE II DECISION SDR2006-00008/PAUL SCHATZ MAJOR MODIFICATION PAGE 11 OF 24 Parking in Mixed-Use Projects: In mixed-use projects, the required minimum vehicle parking shall be determined using the following formula. 1) Primary use, i.e., that with the largest proportion of total floor area within the development, at 100% of the minimum vehicle parking required for that use in Section 18.765.060; 2 Secondary use,i.e.,that with the second largest percentage of total floor area within the development, e ent, at 90% of the vehicle parking required for that use in Section 18.765.060; 3) Subsequent use or uses, at 80% of the vehicle parking required for that use(s) in Section 18.765.060; 4) The maximum parking allowance shall be 150% of the total minimum parking as calculated above. This proposal is not considered a mixed-use project as it will contain solely office space; therefore this standard is not applicable. Visitor Parking in Multi-Family Residential Developments: Multi-dwelling units with more than 10 required parking spaces shall provide an additional 15% of vehicle parking spaces above the minimum required for the use of guests of residents of the complex. These spaces shall be centrally located or distributed throughout the development. Required bicycle parking facilities shall also be centrally located within or evenly distributed throughout the development. This project does not involve a residential use. Therefore,this standard does not apply. Preferential Long-Term Carpool/Vanpool Parking: Parking lots providing in excess of 20 long-term parking spaces shall provide preferential long-term carpool and vanpool parking.for employees, students and other regular visitors to the site. At least 5% of total long-term parking spaces shall be reserved for carpool/vanpool use. Preferential parking for carpools/vanpools shall be closer to the main entrances of the building than any other employee or student parking except parking spaces designated for use by the disabled. Preferential carpool/vanpool spaces shall be lull-sized per requirements in Section 18.765.040N and shall be clearly designated for use only by carpools and vanpools between 7:00 AM and 5:30 PM Monday through Friday. The parking associated with the development has 63 existing parking spaces and an additional 51 are proposed. e applicant has not furnished information related-to the relative number of long term versus short term parking. A condition will be imposed to meet this standard. Disabled-Accessible Parking: All parking areas shall be provided with the required number of parking spaces for disabled persons as specified by the State of Oregon Uniform Building Code and federal standards. Such parking spaces shall be sized,signed and marked as required by these regulations. The applicant has indicated that there are 5 ADA handicap spaces provided. Based on the 2004 Oregon Structural Specialty Code the applicant must provide 5 spaces. Final determination of the number of required ADA spaces will be made by the building official during the review of the building permit application. As shown,the site plan appears to be in compliance with the ADA requirements. DEQ indirect source construction permit: All parking lots containing 250 spaces or parking structures containing two or more levels shall require review by the Oregon Department of Environmental Quality DE to: 1. Acquire an Indirect Source Construction Permit; or 2. Investigate the feasibility of installing oil and grease separators This standard is not applicable. Access Drives: With regard to access to public streets from off-street parking: access drives from the street to off- street parking or loading areas shall be designed and constructed to facilitate the flow of traffic and provide maximum safety for pedestrian and vehicular traffic on the site; the number and size of access drives shall be in accordance with the requirements of Chapter, 18.705 Access, Egress and Circulation• access drives shall be clearly and permanently marked and defined through use of rails, fences, walls or other barriers or markers on frontage not occupied by service drives; access drives shall have a minimum vision clearance in accordance with Chapter 18.795, Visual Clearance; access NOTICE OF TYPE II DEQSION SDR2006-00008/PAUL SQ-IATZ MAJOR MODIFICATION PAGE 12 OF 24 drives shall be improved with an asphalt or concrete surface; and excluding single-family and duplex residences, except as provided by Subsection 18.810.030.P, groups of two or more parking spaces shall be served by a service drive so that no backing movements or other maneuvering within a street or other public right-of-way will be required. The proposed access drive is clearly marked, and the parking area provides ample room to facilitate a forward entrance onto the private access drive that connects to the public street. Pedestrian Access: Pedestrian access through parking lots shall be provided in accordance with Section 18.705.030.F. Where a parking area or other vehicle area has a drop-off grade separation, the property owner shall install a wall, railing, or other barrier which will prevent a slow-moving vehicle or driverless vehicle from escaping such area and which will prevent pedestrians from walking over drop-off edges. There are no drop-off grade separated areas within the parking area. Parking Lot Striping: Except for single-family and duplex residences, any area intended to be used to meet the off-street parking requirements as contained in this Chapter shall have all parking spaces clearly marked; and all interior drives and access aisles shall be clearly marked and signed to show direction of flow and maintain vehicular and pedestrian safety. The plans submitted show the parking spaces are clearly marked with striping. Wheel Stops: Parking spaces along the boundaries of a parking lot or adjacent to interior landscaped areas or sidewalks shall be provided with a wheel stop at least four inches high located three feet back from the front of the parking stall. The front three feet of the parking stall may be concrete, asphalt or low lying landscape material that does not exceed the height of the wheel stop. This area cannot be calculated to meet landscaping or sidewalk requirements. All of the standard parking spaces measure at least 15.5 by 8.5 feet with three feet of bumper overhang; most spaces measure 9 feet in width. No compact spaces are proposed. Curbing is provided on the perimeter of the parking area. This standard has been met. Space and Aisle Dimensions: Section 18.765.040.N states that: "except as modified for angled parking in Figures 18.765.1 and 18.765.2 the minimum dimensions for parking spaces are: 8.5 feet x 18.5 feet for a standard space and 7.5 feet x 16.5 feet for a compact space"; aisles accommodating two direction traffic, or allowing access from both ends, shall be 24 feet in width. No more than 50% of the required spaces may be compact spaces. The applicant's dimensioned plans show that all spaces fully conform to standard sized spaces. All aisles exceed the minimum width o 24 feet;most are 26 feet. A proposed one way drive aisle around the rear of the building is 13 feet at its narrowest point. The code does not give standards for one-way aisle widths, but the parking structure matrix shows a minimum 13 feet. Because this aisle is so narrow, it should be clearly marked as a one-way drive aisle. The decision has been conditioned to ensure the aisle is properly marked. Bicycle Parking Location and Access: Section 18.765.D50 states bicycle parking areas shall be provided at locations within 50 feet of primary entrances to structures; bicycle parking areas shall not be located within parking aisles, landscape areas or pedestrian ways; outdoor bicycle parking shall be visible from on-site buildings and/or the street. When the bicycle parking area is not visible from the street, directional signs shall be used to located the parking area; and bicycle parking may be located inside a building on a floor which has an outdoor entrance open for use and floor location which does not require the bicyclist to use stairs to gain access to the space. Exceptions may be made to the latter requirement for parking on upper stories within a multi-story residential building. NOTICE OF TYPE II DECISION SDR2006-00008/PAUL SC HATZ MAJOR MODIFICATION PAGE 13 OF 24 The site plan shows bicycle parking within 20 feet to each building entrance. All locations may not be visible from the street due to the sites location in relation to the street, but the parking is provided in such close proximity to the building entrances that signage is not necessary. Bicycle Parking Design Requirements: Section 18.765.050.C. The following design requirements apply to the installation of bicycle racks: The racks required for required bicycle parking spaces shall-ensure that bicycles may be securely locked to them without undue inconvenience. Provision of bicycle lockers for long-term (employee) parking is encouraged but not required; bicycle racks must be securely anchored to the groun When or other structure; bicycle parking spaces shall be at least 21/2 feet by six feet long,and when covered,with a vertical clearance of seven feet. An access aisle of at least five feet wide shall be provided and maintained beside or between each row of bicycle parking; each required bicycle parking space must be accessible without moving another bicycle; required bicycle parking spaces may not be rented or leased except where required motor vehicle parking is rented or leased. At-cost or deposit fees for bicycle parking are exempt from this reqquirement; and areas set aside for required bicycle parking must be clearly reserved for bicycle arking only. Outdoor bicycle parking facilities shall-be surfaced with a hard surfaced material-i.e., pavers, asphalt, concrete or similar material. This surface must be designed to remain well drained. The applicant has not provided a detail of the bike rack to be used;therefore, staff is unable to confirm that this standard is met. The applicant will need to provide a detail of the proposed bike rack with the building permit submittal. Minimum Bicycle Parking Requirements: The total number of required bicycle parking spaces for each use is specified in Table 18.765.2 in Section 18.765.070.H. In no case shall there be less than two bicycle parking spaces. According to Table 18.7652 of the Tigard Development Code, the minimum bicycle-parking requirement for both sales-oriented retail and bulk sales is 0.3 spaces per 1,000 gross square feet. Based on the total square footage of the building, the required number of bicycle spaces is fourteen (14). Fourteen spaces are provided. This criterion is met. Minimum Off-Street Parking: Section 18.765.070.H states that the minimum and maximum parking shall be as required in Table 18.765.2. The minimum parking for the existing use of bulk sales is 1.0 space pe_r 1,000 gross square feet; for the proposed use of sales-oriented retail 3.7 spaces per 1,000 is required. The proposed addition and existing building totals 44,491 square feet, therefore 58 spaces are required. The site lies within the Zone B parking area for purposes of calculating maximum number of parking spaces. The maximum allowed parking is 2.0 and 6.2 spaces per 1,000 g.s.f. or 110 spaces. The applicant has an existing 63 spaces and has proposed an additional 51 spaces bringing the total to 114 spaces. Five of these are handicap accessible spaces and are not included in the maximum number allowed. Therefore both minimum and maximum standards are met. Off-Street Loading Spaces: Commercial, industrial and institutional buildings or structures to be built or altered which receive and distribute material or merchandise by truck shall provide and maintain off-street loading and maneuvering space as follows: A minimum of one loading space is required for buildings with 10,000 ross square feet or more; A minimum of two loading spaces for buildings with 40,000 gross square�eet or more. The applicant has proposed a 4,746 square-foot addition. Total square footage of the building will be 44,491. The existing building already includes three loading spaces, which exceeds the two spaces required. This standard has been met. FINDING: Based on the analysis above,the off-street parking and loading standards have not been fully satisfied; however, if the applicant complies with the conditions listed below, the standards will be met. NOTICE OF TYPE II DECISION SDR2006-00008/PAUL SCHATZ MAJOR MODIFICATION PAGE 14 OF 24 CONDITIONS: • Prior to issuance of building/site permits the applicant shall submit plans for review and approval that show the direction of flow and signage details for the one-way access drive. • Prior to issuance of building/site permits, the applicant shall submit information stating the number of long-term parking spaces Being provided. If this number exceeds 20, then a revised site plan must be submitted for review and approval that shows how the carpool/vanpoo-1 parking standards are met. • Provide a detail of the bike racks to be used. Signs (18.780): Chapter 18.780.130.0 lists the type of allowable signs and sign area permitted in the C-G Zoning District. There is an existing sign on-site. The application does not request any changes to the existing signage. This section does not apply. Tree Removal(18.790 18.790.030,Tree Plan Requirement A. Tree plan required. A tree plan for the planting, removal and protection of trees prepared by a certified arborist shall be provided for any ot, parcel or combination of lots or parcels for which a development application for a subdivision, partition, site development review, planned development or conditional use is filed. Protection is preferred over removal wherever possible. As required, the applicant submitted a tree plan (dated December 7, 2006) conducted by John O'Shea, certified arborist. B. Plan requirements. The tree plan shall include the following: 1. Identification of the location, size and species of all existing trees including trees designated as significant by the city; The Arborist Report identified the location, size and species of all existing trees, consistent with this standard. 2. Identification of a program to save existing trees or mitigate tree removal over 12 inches in caliper. Mitigation must follow the replacement guidelines of Section 18.790.060D, in accordance with the following standards and shall be exclusive of trees required by other development code provisions for landscaping,streets and parking lots: a. Retention of less than 25% of existing trees over 12 inches in caliper requires a mitigation program in accordance with Section 18.790.060D of no net loss of trees; b. Retention of from 25% to 50% of existing trees over 12 inches in caliper requires that two-thirds of the trees to be removed-be mitigated in accordance with Section 18.790.060D; c. Retention of from 50% to 75% of existing trees over 12 inches in caliper requires that 50 percent of the trees to be removed be mitigated in accordance with Section 18.790.060D; d. Retention of 75% or greater of existing trees over 12 inches in caliper requires no mitigation. The applicant's tree removal plan and arborist report indicate the trees on the property that are to remain and those proposed for removal. The plan shows tree #23 as being saved but the applicant states in an addendum to the narrative that this tree will be removed. There are a total of 6 trees on site 12 inches and greater. One is hazardous and thus only 5 are subject to mitigation. Of these, 3 will be retained. This equates to 60% retention. According to the mitigation schedule above 50% of the inches to be removed shall be mitigated. The applicant has proposed paying the fee-in-lieu of mitigation because there is limited space on-site to plant trees. NOTICE OF TYPE II DECISION SDR2006-00008/PAUL SQ-IATZ MAJOR MODIFICATION PAGE 15 OF 24 • 3. Identification of all trees which are proposed to be removed; The applicant has provided a tree removal plan and a copy of the arborist's tree survey. 4. A protection program defining standards and methods that will be used by the applicant to protect trees during and after construction. The guidelines for tree protection are outlined in the arborist report. 18.790.040 Incentives for Tree Retention B. Subsequent removal of a tree. Any tree preserved or retained in accordance with this section may thereafter be removed only for the reasons set out in a tree plan in accordance with Section 18.790.030, or as a condition of approval for a conditional use, and shall not be subject to removal under any other section of this chapter. The propperty owner shall record a deed restriction as a condition of approval of any development pemut affected by this section to the effect that such tree may be removed only if the tree des or is hazardous according to a certified arborist. The deed restriction may be removed or will be considered invalid if a tree preserved in accordance with this section should either die or be removed as a hazardous tree. The form of this deed restriction shall be subject to approval by the Director. Conditions of approval will ensure that this standard is met. CONDITIONS: • Prior to commencing site work,the applicant shall pay a tree mitigation fee in-lieu of replanting for the value of 26.25 caliper inches (26.25 x$125=$3,281.25). • Tree Protection - Prior to any site work the applicant shall install all proposed tree protection fencing. The fencing shall be inspected and approved by the Project Arborist and City Planner Cheryl Caines prior to commencing any site work. Te tree protection fencing shall remain in place through the duration of all of the building construction phases,until the Certificate of Occupancy has been approved. • Prior to issuance of building permits, the applicant shall submit site plan drawings indicating the location of the trees that were preserved on the lot during site development, location of tree protection fencing, and a signature of approval from the project arborist regarding the placement and construction techniques to be employed in building the structures. All proposed protection fencing _shall be installed and inspected prior to commencing construction. The fencing shall remain in place through the duration of all of the building construction hases until the Certificate of Occupancy has been approved. After approval from Qty Staff,the tree protection measures may be removed. • Prior to any Certificates of Occupancy, the applicant shall ensure that the Project Arborist has submitted written reports to the Planning Department (Cheryl Caines), at least, once every two weeks from initial tree protection zone (TPZ) fencing installation, through the building construction phases, as he monitors the construction activities and progress. This inspection will be to evaluate the tree protection fencing, determine if the fencing was moved at any point during construction,and determine if any part of the Tree Protection Plan has been violated. These reports must be provided to the City until the time of the issuance of any Certificates of Occupancy. The reports shall include any changes that occurred to the TPZ as well as the condition and location of the tree protection fencing. If the amount of TPZ was reduced then the Project Arborist shall justify why the fencing was moved, and shall certify that the construction activities to the trees did not adversely impact the overall,long-term health and stability of the tree(s). NOTICE OF TYPE II DEQSION SDR2006-00008/PAUL SCHATZ MAJOR MODIFICATION PAGE 16 OF 24 If the reports are not submitted or received by the City Planner at the scheduled intervals and if it appears the TPZ's or the Tree Protection Plan are not being followed by the contractor or a sub-contractor,the City can stop work on the roject until an inspection can be done by the City Staff and the Project Arborist. Prior to issuance of any Certificates of Occupancy, the Project Arborist will submit a final certification indicating the elements of the Tree Protection Plan were followed and that all remaining trees on the site are healthy, stable and viable in their modified growing environment. Deed Restriction Prior to issuance of any Certificates of Occupancy,the applicant/owner shall record a deed restriction to the effect that any existing tree greater than 12" diameter maybe removed only if the tree dies or is hazardous according to a certified arborist. The deed restriction may be removed or will be considered-invalid if a tree preserved in accordance with this decision should either die or be removed as a hazardous tree. Visual Clearance Areas (18.795): Chapter 18.795 requires that a clear vision area shall be maintained on the corners of all property adjacent to intersecting right-of-ways or the intersection of a public street and a private driveway. A clear vision area shall contain no vehicle, hedge, planting, fence, wall structure, or temporary or rm peanent obstruction exceeding three (3) feet in height. the code provides that obstructions that may be located in this area shall be visually clear between three (3) and eight (8) feet in height (8) (trees may be placed within this area provided that all branches below eight 8) feet are removed). A visual clearance area is the triangular area formed by measuring a 30-foot distance along the street right-of-way and the driveway, and then connecting these two(2 ), 30-foot distance points with a straight line. Due to the odd shape of the right-of-way,the site's access does not intersect with the public street. The visual clearance standards do not apply in this situation. A site distance certification is being conditioned for the intersection which is off-site. FINDING: Based on the analysis above,the vision clearance standards do not apply. D. SPECIFIC SITE DEVELOPMENT REVIEW APPROVAL STANDARDS Section 18.360.090(A)(2) through 18.360.090(A)(15) provides additional Site Development Review approval standards not necessarily covered by the provisions of the previously listed sections. These additional standards are addressed immediately below with the following exceptions: The proposal contains no elements related to the provisions of the following and are, therefore, found to be inapplicable as approval standards: 18.360.090.3 (Multi Family Exterior Elevations); 18.360.090.5 (Privacy and Noise: Multi-family or Group Living Uses); 18.360.090.6 (Private Outdoor Areas: Multi-family Use); 18.360.090.7 (Shared Outdoor Recreation Areas: Multi-family Use); 18.360.090.8 (100-year floodplain); and 18.360.090.9 (Demarcation of Spaces). The following sections were discussed elsewhere in this decision and, therefore,will not be addressed in this section: 18.360.090.4 (Buffering, Screening and Compatibility Between Adjoining Uses; 18.360.090.13 (Parking); 18.360.090.14 (Landscaping); 18.360.090.15 (Drainage);and 18.360.090.14 (Provision for the Disabled.). Relationship to the Natural and Physical Environment: Buildings shall be: located to preserve existing trees, topography and natural drainage where possible based upon existing site conditions; located in areas not subject to ground slumping or sliding; located to provide adequate distance between adjoining buildings for adequate light, air circulation, and fire-fighting.; and oriented with consideration for sun and wind. Trees shall be preserved to the extent possible. Replacement of trees is subject to the requirements of Chapter 18.790,Tree Removal. NOTICE OF TYPE II DECISION SDR2006-00008/PAUL ScHATZ MAJOR MODIFICATION PAGE 17 OF 24 The proposal is to add 4,746 square feet to an existing 39 745 square-foot building. The addition is proposed in a grassy area along the western side of the building. There are only two 8-inch cedar trees within this area that must be removed. Other trees along the southern boundary are also being removed to construct the accessway around that side of the building Trees greater than 12-inch DBH are subject to mitigation as required by the landscaping standards of Chapter 18.7-45 and 18.630. Crime Prevention and Safety: A. Windows shall be located so that areas vulnerable to crime can be surveyed by the occupants; B. Intenor laundry and service areas shall be located in a way that they can be observed by others; C. Mail boxes shall be located in lighted areas having vehicular or pedestrian traffic; D. The exterior lighting levels shall be selected and-the angles shall be oriented towards areas vulnerable to crime; and E. Light fixtures shall be provided in areas having heavy pedestrian or vehicular traffic and in potentially dangerous areas such as parking lots, stairs, ramps and abrupt grade changes. Fixtures shall be placed at a height so that-light patterns overlap at a height of seven feet, which is sufficient to illuminate a person. The applicant has provided elevation plans but no floor plans. Due to the type of use f( urniiture sales),there are areas used primarily for storage. These areas have no windows for security reasons. These areas are along the south and southwesterly portions of the building, which are the less visible areas of the development. Windows are provided in the storefront areas. There are no interior service areas or mailboxes for the development. The applicant has shown on the site plan how the modified areas of the site will be illuminated. A mixture of freestanding light poles and wall- mounted fixtures are proposed. FINDING: The standards for Site Development Review have been met. Public Transit Provisions within the plan shall be included for providing for transit if the development proposal is adjacent to an existing or proposed transit route; the requirements for transit facilities shall be based on: the location of other transit facilities in the area; and the size and type of the proposal. The following facilities may be required after City and Tri-Met review: bus stop shelters; turnouts for buses;and connecting paths to the shelters. The subject site is not adjacent to an existing or proposed transit route. The closest route is along SW 72nd Avenue. This standard does not apply. E. STREET AND UTILITY IMPROVEMENTS STANDARDS Chapter 18.810 provides construction standards for the implementation of public and private facilities and utilities such as streets,sewers,and drainage. The applicable standards are addressed below: Streets: Improvements: Section 18.810.030.A.1 states that streets within a development and streets adjacent shall be improved in accordance with the TDC standards. Section 18.810.030.A.2 states that any new street or additional street width planned as a portion of an existing street shall be dedicated and improved in accordance with the TDC. This site lies adjacent to SW Bonita Road, which is classified as a Collector on the City of Tigard Transportation Plan Map. At present,there is approximately 190 feet of ROW,according to the most recent tax assessor's map. This portion of Bonita Road is within ODOT ROW. NOTICE OF TYPE II DECISION SDR2006-00008/PAUL SCHATZ MAJOR MODIFICATION PAGE 18 OF 24 SW Bonita Road is currently partially. In order to mitigate the impact from this development,the applicant should construct a 6 foot, curb-tight, concrete sidewalk along the Bonita Road frontage. The street trees will be planted behind the sidewalk, thus eliminating the planter strip between the curb and sidewalk The elimination of the planter strip and the narrower sidewalk, 6 foot rather than 8 foot is being allowed due to the steep slope from Bonita Road down to the site. All work within the ROW will'require a Miscellaneous Permit from ODOT. Future Street Plan and Extension of Streets: Section 18.810.030.F states that a future street plan shall be filed which shows the_ pattern of existing and proposed future streets from the boundanes of the proposed land division. This section also states that where it is necessary to give access or permit a satisfactory future division of adjoining land, streets shall be extended to the boundary lines of the tract to be developed and a barricade shall be constructed at the end of the street These street stubs to adjoining properties are not considered to be cul-de-sacs since they are intended to continue as through streets at such time as the adjoining property is developed. A barricade shall be constructed at the end of the street by the property owners which shall not be removed until authorized by the City Engineer, the cost of which shall be included in the street construction cost Temporary hammerhead turnouts or temporary cul-de-sac bulbs shall be constructed for stub streets in excess of 150 feet in length. The applicant did not address this section. Due to the location of Bonita Road,Interstate 5 and pre-existing development there are no opportunities for future streets or extensions of streets. Street Alignment and Connections: Section 18.810.030.H.1 states that full street connections with spacing of no more than 530 feet between connections is required except where prevented by barriers such as topography, railroads, freeways, preexisting developments lease provisions, easements, covenants or other restrictions existing prior to May 1, 1995 which preclude street connections. A full street connection may also be exempted due to a regulated water feature if regulations would not permit construction. Section 18.810.030.H.2 states that all local, neighborhood routes and collector streets which abut a development site shall be extended within the site to provide through circulation when not precluded by environmental or topographical constraints, existing development patterns or strict adherence to other standards in this code. A street connection or extension is precluded when it is not possible to redesign, or reconfigure the street pattern to provide required extensions. Land is considered topographically constrained if the slope is greater than 15% for a distance of 250 feet or more. In the case of environmental or topographical constraints, the mere presence of a constraint is not sufficient to show that a street connection is not possible. The applicant must show why the constraint precludes some reasonable street connection. The applicant did not address this section. Due to the location of Bonita Road,Interstate 5,steep slopes and pre-existing development there are no opportunities to provide street connections. Block Designs - Section 18.810.040.A states that the length, width and shape of blocks shall be designed with due regard to providing adequate building sites for the use contemplated consideration of needs -for convenient access, circulation, control and safety of street traffic and recognition of limitations and opportunities of topography. Block Sizes: Section 18.810.040.B.1 states that the perimeter of blocks formed by streets shall not exceed 1,800 feet measured along the right-of-way line except: • Where street location is precluded by natural topography, wetlands or other bodies of water or,pre-existing development or, • For blocks adjacent to arterial streets, limited access highways,major collectors or railroads. • For non-residential blocks in which internal public circulation provides equivalent access. The site is adjacent to an interstate highway(1-5) and below the grade of Bonita Road access to the site is limited. Further constraints are placed on the site because it is located in an area that is fully developed. Commercial developments abut the property to the south and west. There are no opportunities to provide a new connection to existing right-of-way. NOTICE OF TYPE II DECISION SDR2006-00008/PAUL SCHATZ MAJOR MODIFICATION PAGE 19 OF 24 Section 18.810.040.B.2 also states that bicycle and pedestrian connections on public easements or right-of-ways shall be provided when full street connection is not possible. Spacing between connections shall be no more than 330 feet, except where precluded by environmental or topographical constraints, existing development patterns, or strict adherence to other standards in the code. For the same reasons stated above, there is little opportunity to provide a bicycle/pedestrian connection on this site. The orientation of the buildings of surrounding developments also does not naturally lead to a highly functioning pedestrian connection. The parking and building entrances face away from one another. Customers to retail-business do not generally venture to the rear or loading areas of the building. Lots - Size and Shape: Section 18.810.060(A) prohibits lot depth from being more than 2.5 times the average lot width, unless the parcel is less than 1.5 times the minimum lot size of the applicable zoning district. Lot Frontage: Section 18.810.060(B) requires that lots have at least 25 feet of frontage on public or private streets, other than an alley. In the case of a land partition, 18.420.050.A.4.c applies, which requires a parcel to either have a minimum 15-foot frontage or a minimum 15-foot wide recorded access easement. In cases where the lot is for an attached single-family dwelling unit, the frontage shall be at least 15 feet. No new parcels are being created with this project. These standards do not apply. Sidewalks: Section 18.810.070.A requires that sidewalks be constructed to meet City design standards and be located on both sides of arterial, collector and local residential streets. Private streets and industrial streets shall have sidewalks on at least one side. The applicant's plans indicate they will construct a 6-foot curb- i t sidewalk along their Bonita Road frontage. The street trees will be planted behind the sidewalc, thus eliminating the planter strip between the curb and sidewalk. The elimination of the planter strip and the narrower sidewalk, 6 foot rather than 8 foot, is being allowed due to the steep slope from Bonita Road down to the site. The distance from the west end of the frontage to the concrete curb return at the intersection of Bonita Road and Sequoia Parkway is approximately 170 feet. 18.810.070.B.2 provides for extending the sidewalk to meet the existing sidewalk. In this case, the asphalt sidewalk does not meet the standards and shall be replaced by the applicant,subject to rough proportionality,with a 6-foot,curb-tight,concrete sidewalk to the concrete curb return. Sanitary Sewers: Sewers Required: Section 18.810.090.A requires that sanitary sewer be installed to serve each new development and to connect developments to existing mains in accordance with the provisions set forth in Design and Construction Standards for Sanitary and Surface Water Management(as adopted by the Unified Sewerage Agency in 1996 and including any future revisions or amendments) and the adopted policies of the comprehensive plan. Over--sizing.: Section 18.810.090.0 states that proposed sewer systems shall include consideration of additional development within the area as projected by the Comprehensive Plan. The applicant did not address this section of the code. There is a public sewer main on the site. The applicant has proposed a new connection from the addition to the public main. Storm Drainage: General Provisions: Section 18.810.100.A states requires developers to make adequate provisions for storm water and flood water runoff. Accommodation of Upstream Drainage: Section 18.810.100.0 states that a culvert or other drainage facility shall be large enough to accommodate potential runoff from its entire upstream drainage area, whether inside or outside the development. The City Engineer shall approve the necessary size of the facility, based on the provisions of Design and Construction Standards for Sanitary and Surface Water Management(as adopted by the Unified Sewerage Agency in 2000 and including any future revisions or amendments). NOTICE OF TYPE II DECISION SDR2006-00008/PAUL SCHATZ MAJOR MODIFICATION PAGE 20 OF 24 The applicant did not address this section of the code. Runoff from the sloped area adjacent to Bonita Road will be collected on site. There are no major drainage ways that impact this development. Effect on Downstream Drainage: Section 18.810.100.D states that where it is anticipated by the City Engineer that the additional runoff resulting from the development will overload an existing drainage facility the Director and Engineer shall withhold approval of the development until provisions have been made for improvement of the potential condition or until provisions have been made for storage of additional runoff caused by the development in accordance with the Design and Construction Standards for Sanitary and Surface Water Management (as adopted by the Unified Sewerage agency in 2000 and including any future revisions or amendments). In 1997,Clean Water Services (CWS) completed a basin study of Fanno Creek and adopted the Fanno Creek Watershed Management Plan. Section V of that plan includes a recommendation that local governments institute a stormwater detention/effective impervious area reduction program resulting in no net increase in storm peak flows up to the 25-year event. The City will require that all new developments resulting resultingin an increase of impervious surfaces provide onsite detention facilities,unless the development is adacent to Fanno Creek. For those developments adjacent to Fanno Creek,the storm water runoff will be permitted to discharge without detention. The applicant's plans indicate they will provide on-site detention by installing an underground pipe on the west side of the development. Bikeways and Pedestrian Pathways: Bikeway Extension: Section 18.810.110.A states that developments adjoining proposed bikeways identified on the City's adopted pedestrian/bikeway plan shall include provisions for the future extension of such bikeways through the dedication of easements or right-of-way. Bonita Road is identified as a Bicycle Facility on Tigard's TSP. Cost of Construction: Section 18.810.110.B states that development permits issued for planned unit developments, conditional use permits subdivisions and other developments which will principally benefit from such bikeways shall be conditioned to include the cost or construction of bikeway improvements. The applicant shall provide bicycle striping or pay the fee-in-lieu along their frontage. The amount of the striping would be as follows: 421 feet of 8-inch white stripe,at$2.50/lf $1,052.50 10 Mono-directional reflective markers @ $4.00/ea $ 40.00 2 Bike lane legends @ $175/ea $ 350.00 2 Directional mini-arrows @ $100/ea $ 200.00 $1,642.50 Minimum Width: Section 18.810.110.0 states that the minimum width for bikeways within the roadway is five feet per bicycle travel lane. Minimum width for two-way bikeways separated from the road is eight feet. The minimum width for a bicycle lane along a collector is 6 feet. Utilities: Section 18.810.120 states that all utility lines, but not limited to those required for electric communication, lighting and cable television services and related facilities shall be placed underground, except for surface mounted transformers, surface mounted connection boxes and meter cabinets which may be placed above ground, temporary utility service facilities during construction,high capacity electric lines operating at 50,000 volts or above,and: • The developer shall make all necessary arrangements with the serving utility to provide the underground services; • The City reserves the right to approve location of all surface mounted facilities; • All underground utilities, including sanitary sewers and storm drains installed in streets by the developer,shall be constructed prior to the surfacing of the streets;and NOTICE OF TYPE II DECISION SDR2006-00008/PAUL SCHATZ MAJOR MODIFICATION PAGE 21 OF 24 Stubs for service connections shall be long enough to avoid disturbing the street improvements when service connections are made. Exception to Under-Grounding Requirement Section 18.810.120.0 states that a developer shall pay a fee in-lieu of under-grounding costs when the development is proposed to take place on a street where existing utilities which are not underground will serve time development and the approval authority determines that the cost and technical difficulty of under-grounding the utilities outweighs the benefit of under-grounding in conjunction with the development. The determination shall be on a case-by-case basis. The most common, but not the only, such situation is a short frontage development for which under-grounding would result in the placement of additional poles, rather than the removal of above-ground utilities facilities. An applicant for a development which is served by utilities which are not underground and which are located across a public right-of-way from the applicant's property shall pay a fee in-lieu of under-grounding. There are existing overhead utility lines along the frontage of SW Bonita Road. If the fee in-lieu is proposed, it is equal to$35.00 per lineal foot of street frontage that contains the overhead lines. The frontage along this site is 421 lineal feet;therefore the fee would be $14,735.00. ADDITIONAL CITY AND/OR AGENCY CONCERNS WITH STREET AND UTILITY IMPROVEMENT STANDARDS: Fire and Life Safety: The applicant shall submit a letter of approval from TVFR for the site layout,fire hydrant placement and fire spruilder requirements prior to issuance of permits. Public Water System: The applicant has not proposed any public water improvements. Storm Water Quality: The City has agreed to enforce Surface Water Management(SWM) regulations established by Clean Water Services (CWS) Design and Construction Standards (adopted by Resolution and Order No. 00-7) which require the construction of on-site water quality facilities. The facilities shall be designed to remove 65 percent of the phosphorus contained in 100 percent of the storm water runoff generated from newly created impervious surfaces. In addition, a maintenance plan shall be submitted indicating the frequency and method to be used in keeping the facility maintained through the year. Prior to construction, the applicant shall submit plans and calculations for a water quality facility that will meet the intent of the CWS Design Standards. In addition,the applicant shall submit a maintenance plan for the facility that must be reviewed and approved by the City prior to construction. The proposed unit from Stormwater Management is acceptable provided the property owner agrees to hire the manufacturer (or approved equal). to provide the required maintenance of the unit. Pnor to a final building inspection, the applicant shall demonstrate that they have entered into a maintenance agreement with Stormwater Management, or another company that demonstrates they can meet the maintenance requirements of the manufacturer. Grading and Erosion Control: CWS Design and Construction Standards also regulate erosion control to reduce the amount of sediment and other pollutants reaching the public storm and surface water system resulting from development, construction, grading, excavating, clearing, and any other activity which accelerates erosion. Per CWS regulations, the applicant is required to submit an erosion control plan for City review and approval prior to issuance of City permits. The Federal Clean Water Act requires that a National Pollutant Discharge Elimination System (NPDES) erosion control permit be issued for any development that will disturb one or more acre of and. Since this site is over five acres, the developer w' be required to obtain an NPDES permit from the City prior to construction. This permit will be issued along with the site and/or building permit. NOTICE OF TYPE II DECISION SDR2006-00008/PAUL SCHATZ MAJOR MODIFICATION PAGE 22 OF 24 Address Assignments: The City of Tigard is responsible for assigning addresses for parcels within the City of Tigard and within the Urban Service Boundary(USB). An addressing fee in the amount of $50.00 per address shall be assessed. This fee shall be paid to the City prior to issuance of building permits. The developer will also be required to provide signage at the entrance of each shared flag lot driveway or private street that lists the addresses that are served by the given driveway or street. This will assist emergency services personnel to more easily find a particular address. F. IMPACT STUDY Section 18.360.090 states, "The Director shall make a finding with respect to each of the following criteria when approving,approving with conditions or denying an application:" Section 18.390.040 states that the applicant shall provide an impact study to quantify the effect of development on public facilities and services. For each public facility system and type of impact, the study shall propose improvements necessary to meet City standard, and to minimize the impact of the development on the public at large, public facilities systems, and affected private property users. In situations where the Community Development Code requires the dedication of real property interests, the applicant shall either specifically concur with a requirement for public right-of-way dedication, or provide evidence that supports that the real property dedication is not roughly proportional to the projected impacts of the development. Section 18.390.040 states that when a condition of approval requires the transfer to the public of an interest in real property, the approval authority shall adopt findings which support the conclusion that the interest in real property to be transferred is roughly proportional to the impact the proposed development will have on the public. The proposal is to add a small addition to an existing commercial building. Impacts on sewer, water, and noise will be minimal. Traffic impact will be handled by payment of traffic impact fees and required street improvements. These improvements are minimal due to the existing pavement width of Bonita Road,which is the only street frontage-for the site. The Washington County Traffic Impact Fee (TIF) is a mitigation measure that is required at the time of development. Based on a transportation impact study prepared by Mr. David Larson for the A Boy Expansion/Dolan II/Resolution 95-61, TIF's are expected to recapture 32 percent of the traffic impact of new development on the Collector and Arterial Street system. Based on the use and the size of the use proposed, the applicant is required to pay TIF's of approximately$1,596.00. Final TIF payment will be assessed at time of building permit submittal. Based on the estimate that total TIF fees cover 32 percent of the impact on major street improvements citywide a fee that would cover 100 percent of this projects traffic impact is $4,987.50 ($1,596 divided by.32). The difference between the TIF paid, and the full impact, is considered the unmitigated impact on the street system. Since the 'ITN to be paid is $1,596, the unmitigated impact has an estimated value of $3,391.50. Besides the TIF that mitigates for 32% of the projects impact on the transportation system, the applicant is required to construct a 6-foot sidewalk along the site's frontage, which is approximately 420 feet. At an estimated cost of $20.00 per lineal foot the sidewalk is valued at$8,400. In addition,the applicant is required to provide bike striping along Bonita Road or pay a fee-in-lieu in the amount of$1,642.50. The total value of these improvements is $10,042.50. The value of these improvements and right-of- way dedication is greater than the total value of the projected impact but are required to. meet the street improvement requirements of 18.810.030. In addition, the applicant has proposed making the sidewalk improvements. SECTION VII. OTHER STAFF COMMENTS The City of Tigard Building Division has reviewed the proposal and had no comments. The City of Tigard Engineering Department was sent this proposal for review and the comments have been incorporated into this decision. NOTICE OF TYPE II DECISION SDR2006-00008/PAUL SCHATZ MAJOR MODIFICATION PAGE 23 OF 24 The City of Tigard Police Department has reviewed this application and offered no comments or objections. The City of Tigard Public Works Department was sent a copy of the proposal, but no comments were received. SECTION VIII. AGENCY COMMENTS Tualatin Valley Fire and Rescue (TVF&R) and was sent a copy of the proposal, but no comments were received. Washington County Land Use and Transportation has reviewed the proposal and had no objections. SECTION IX. PROCEDURE AND APPEAL INFORMATION Notice: Notice was posted at City Hall and mailed to: X The applicant and owners X Owner of record within the required distance X Affected government agencies Final Decision: THIS DECISION IS FINAL ON FEBRUARY 28,2007 AND BECOMES EFFECTIVE ON MARCH 15,2007 UNLESS AN APPEAL IS FILED. &Deal: The decision of the Director (Type II Procedure) or Review Authority (Type II Administrative Appeal or Type III Procedure) is final for purposes of appeal on the date that it is ed. Anyparty with standing as provided in Section 18.390.040.G.1. may appeal this decision in accordance with Section 18.390.040.G.2. of the T�Ig�a�nd Community Development Code which provides that a written appeal together with the required fee shall be filed with the Director within ten (10)business days of the date the notice of the decision was mailed. The a••-al fee schedule and forms are available from the Planning Division of Tigard City Hall, 13125 SW Hall :oulevard,Tigard,Oregon 97223. Unless the applicant is the appellant,the hearing on an appeal from the Director's Decision shall be confined to the specific issues identified in the written comments submitted by the parties during the comment period. Additional evidence concerning issues properly raised in the Notice of Appeal may be submitted by any party during the appeal hearing,subject to any additional rules of procedure that may be adopted from time to time by the appellate body. ITHE DEADLINE FOR FILING AN APPEAL IS AT 5:00 PM ON MARCH 14,2007. stions: If you have any questions, please call the City of Tigard Planning Division, Tigard City Hall, 13125 SW Hall Boulevard,Tigard,Oregon at(503) 639-4171. a e '4____) Feb 28,2007 PREPARE BY: Cheryl Caines DATE Assistant Planner cucpin\cheryl\sdr\Paul Schatz(SDR2006-00008)\sdr2006-00008 decision.doc NOTICE OF TYPE II DECISION SDR2006-00008/PAUL SCHATZ MAJOR MODIFICATION PAGE 24 OF 24 v CITY of TIGARD GEOGRAPHIC INFORMATION SYSTEM VICINITY MAP 111,---, _ 1 LEI ar .E., ::. . SDR2006-00008 MY MEADOWS RD VAR2006-00086 PAUL SCHATZ MAJOR MODIFICATION • Lt I BONITA Re x\X\ ' OPEL . . ,bigiii, I / I ‘ ... \s rill r ..\ lonli iso, -- vit I a- , . im zipmcd,„ lane .i.,.-...., g - . Is IP \ . 0 6 - : e° in �i'g�Jul11111 11 TdNe. w. b I'III AIIIIIi/ m . N NI _, CARDINAL LN / a,,., iiiim . 0 200 400 600 Feet _ I 1"=486 feet tl (81�� S 111111 m ,PPP' I Z TIGARD In'ormation on this ma is for eneral location only and 4 P 9• REDWOOD LN . . should be verified vnth the Development Services Division. ill t 13125 Tigard.SW O Hall Blvd • . 03) 39 9171 t‘l �— (503)639-4171 hitDJlw+vw.ci.tigard.of.us Community Development Plot date: Dec 22,2006;C:lmagicWiAGIC03.APR Keynotes O---- ---1 .. SW BONITA I.�• �.�% worw.0o.a �j.�r r1a M.O7T AI., 1 000500 LA ICAM AN .w1Y/e . A w0w/[.0gm•10[00414.MOM u .•1 r,rart 0033 1._ m omen,,,.ar .Q'y 4.y •in wM'mo•t MAN Lw► MW D[sCn P.C.00•700015•0.501•404•00 . 41 �,�• _, ;..1... $'aL� _ it.1la TO14 t: ,.1[Iq[odM110paAa r,.LGL . MO SM.Brat.aua 100 r �3 I'� A 0037010 100111M0 BMIA TO ammo I4w1.o.MNZpaan .."'"'""'T b _ - I 1.,NM A 0 r N 00101[,5 RI BALL WE Seen-Oa OB7,aF0ffi •1 a Mar wtl PM AmMrwa rsw.nw Ps 11•1 1 •Iz ROHM sums N.N NO rwa02 VI!�' y — 140 p 4a0APsrAtd_ �• •-'-l O O O ,i,5155 Alma,a ntr..nola w Mar�11 FOR AmmaL.L g�— - sawn iY )• ar-.•n EOUa lAtn) 14-e(.47 r-e III,r-r(a AT r-r) 44-r(.AT r-WJ � ■ 5/040505 -.-,FC m W 1 la Aemea,AA,.OM WALL is.nu/PAO A0.71015 IVAUWa 11701. .S,I-iii ———__ p ,•_r IT IT-0.p AT r-o9 Z I-- la Nr040 510•174.L•wacrc.AO' 17.00111101 OM TO SP ROM. ..�1���'y��t�:—�!•�'� f►I '„-a ardAp"L r-r) Y-r r-r r-r : 'O .1I� MINE.NIL MOWS 2!0.7*MT LLYNA01E I.•-0•n A J! !L !I= �Gi Ire Ii! ,; p t • I Curb Types y, lg..., 000... � _..._.._..__._---.-.._._..i . /y^�,�' 11�� C�,lie:— r 0, •., : �tg_:1 X-t/ L ��' 40,Twa CNM TO 9E 10:110.40 51p a ,^, rr..TT// PAL Parcel 2 ■uuul\\\\\\\\\N\a\�\�EII�''' I4 r F °,AUDCD`°'°M"`°RO ■ .,7J�I,i�I L • . 1 GA N rLAt[WM[M[CUM '�4 ,\t OF Ill t y t II�ii Parcel 1 B r� CCSS yy• 63 NI : 1111 0: lit\ v I Paul ■ I�y BUILDING 10 EXISTING ■ t N KIM E AP 0 m § 4V-1' Schatz III BUILDING ■ Grins, 4,746 8F In IMO In MI ro •�� n.naa0 PI 6 0. Nmswsw..wa ■I� ]>± 'T,waorr74N�M•■ 0 �I�la6� 4 it/NI Y. Ifll �� P e o . ■ t i�11�Ie, �• a og ■ t Ill gi�i EXISTING } k O j Paul ■ 1�.l01�16'10 ,x @sual4 :r'v . 4 Schatz L Furniture III LN I ..--a- {{2� O I I u7 . + • rp r-r -•�—1 LLJ Moo sw'sem m Tv.,Omontrztrs � m A 1 1 Q 0 I we.a 1 L`.i I Y :O—r A:1- I- I s0m The p` _^ m �, k a t, ; I w Site Plan N.•, k I ' i Z 'eMr e%ve =— = Jm D • r ` R..,,,.....f J • . . . . e O. Ow =411. 6 i T •A / m '� ;z.,°.�� t FINAL APPROVAL _ O a 1 D ,1CITY OF rIGAFio PLANNING DIVISION �.,, �.. o; p fix; ti■m �� .�� o BYe c.� DATE a.D:3__ } 1 M 1 4?;. O m O V _ 7 JB•`n• J Due 10FN1a T]001 i 41.1 i - 7447 ,� K r 1►.� Cry. tr;$' m `r ..... �5.,.� ��. 5:. glii.� �.�I�Aa7 _r'+1___- tr r lM1",a;T' FIRM MM 0.7• I YN'NY IOW Job Number: 100001 r Site Plan I 2"1 !1 trr70 1. 10 Design Review Re-Submittal-December 2006 A1.1 NOTICE OF TYPE II DECISION SITE DEVELOPMENT REVIEW(SDR) 2006-00008 's „ . PAUL SCHATZ FURNITURE MAJOR MODIFICATION TIGARD (Includes a 30-day extension) 120 DAYS 173/14 00 SECTION I. APPLICATION SUMMARY FILE NAME: PAUL SCHATZ FURNITURE MAJOR MODIFICATION CASE NOS.: Site Development Review(SDR) SDR2006-00008 Variance (VAR) VAR2006-00086 PROPOSAL: The applicant is requesting Site Development Review approval to construct a 4,746 square foot addition to an existing commercial building and to modify the parking areas and drive aisles. A Variance has also been requested to reduce the access width from 50 feet with 40 feet of pavement to 37 feet with 30 feet of pavement. OWNER PACA Properties,LLC 6600 SW Bonita Rd. Tigard, OR 97224 APPLICANT: Mildren Design Group,P.C. Attn: Gene Mildren 7650 SW Beveland St.,Suite 120 Tigard, OR 97223 LOCATION: 6600 SW Bonita Road;WCTM 2S112AD,Tax Lot 1100. ZONE: I-P: Industrial Park District. The I-P zoning district provides appropriate locations for combining light manufacturing, office and small-scale commercial uses, e.g., restaurants, personal services and fitness centers, in a campus-like setting. Only those light industrial uses with no off-site impacts, e.g. noise, glare, odor,vibration are permitted in the I-P zone. In addition to mandatory site development review, design and development standards in the I-P zone have been adopted to insure that developments will be well-integrated, attractively landscaped, and pedestrian-friendly. APPLICABLE REVIEW CRITERIA: Community Development Code Chapters 18.360, 18.370, 18.390, 18.530, 18.705, 18.725, 18.745, 18.755, 18.765, 18.780, 18.790, 18.795 and 18.810. SECTION II. DECISION Notice is hereby given that the City of Tigard Community Development Director's designee has APPROVED the above request. The findings and conclusions on which the decision is based are noted in the full decision, available at City Hall. THIS APPROVAL SHALL BE VALID FOR 18 MONTHS FROM THE EFFECTIVE DATE OF THIS DECISION. All documents and applicable criteria in the above-noted file are available for inspection at no cost or copies can be obtained for twenty-five cents (25C) per page,or the current rate charged for copies at the time of the request. SECTION III. PROCEDURE AND APPEAL INFORMATION Notice: Notice mailed to: X The applicant and owners X Owner of record within the required distance X Affected government agencies Final Decision: THIS DECISION IS FINAL ON FEBRUARY 28, 2007 AND BECOMES EFFECTIVE ON MARCH 15, 2007 UNLESS AN APPEAL IS FILED. Appeal-: The Director's Decision is final on the date that it is mailed. All persons entitled to notice or who are otherwise adversely affected or aggrieved by the decision as_provided in Section 18.390.040.G.1 may appeal this decision in accordance with Section 18.390.040.G.2 of the Tigard Community Development Code which.provides that a written appeal together with the required fee shall be filed with the Director within ten (10) business days of the date the Notice of Decision was mailed. The appeal fee schedule and forms are available from the Planning Division of Tigard City Hall, 13125 SW Hall Boulevard, Tigard, Oregon 97223. Unless the applicant is the appellant, the hearing on an appeal from the Director's Decision shall be confined to the specific issues identified in the written comments submitted by the parties during the comment period. Additional evidence concerning issues,properly raised in the Notice of Appeal may be submitted by any party during the appeal hearing,subject to any additional rules of procedure that maybe adopted from time to time by the appellate body. THE DEADLINE FOR FILING AN APPEAL IS 5:00 PM ON MARCH 14, 2007. d estions: or further information_please contact the Planning Division Staff Planner,Cheryl Caines at (503) 639-4171, Tigard City Hall, 13125 SW Hall Boulevard,Tigard, Oregon 97223. `C ' ‘y, 41111P VICINITY MAP N I SDR2006-00008 1 VAR2006-00086 I PAUL MCHATZ .- MODIFICATION. INN 1 III 1, vr, s ....,- ..p. km/ II ••... ' '" a_nnm g■ /■;i c iRiii - i NO f Immuunniimulluni 1.�as ■l:i i�Ii r■ p r11i11.�11i1MM I�� 1 -1 vi ag 1 ipl I if 4. A . . .. - . Ins de 23,7a6E:C:YnpleMIAOIC83.A6if I `'. . StB-d11TA— • —o-1 --- Q .. m " .._..—._ ••••a•1-L-i-- - - -.'...:.... r.; fi,all n' _ ' u 'I SE; , _ "2: o Ift d 02112.2 ' -. Paul �.._m 1. _ _ I t - ; ,i ! iii . 1 07.3. ,11 v I 1 FINAL LCQ' M GM Or NOTICE TO MORTGAGE,LIENHOLDER,VENDOR OR SELLER: THE TIGARD DEVELOPMENT CODE REQUIRES THAT IF YOU RECEIVE THIS NOTICE,IT SHALL BE PROMPTLY FORWARDED TO THE PURCHASER. NOTICE OF PENDING 11111 q LAND USE APPLICATION • SITE DEVELOPMENT REVIEW TIGARD DATE OF NOTICE: December 26,2006 FILE NUMBERS: SITE DEVELOPMENT REVIEW(SDR) 2006-00008 (Type II Land Use Application) VARIANCE (VAR) 2006-00086 FILE NAME: PAUL SCHATZ MAJOR MODIFICATION REQUEST: The applicant is requesting approval to construct a 4,746 square foot addition to an existing commercial building and to modify the parking areas and drive aisles. A variance has also been requested to reduce the access width from 50 feet with 40 feet of pavement to 37 feet with 30 feet of pavement. LOCATION: 6600 SW Bonita Road;Washington County Tax Map 2S112AD,Tax Lot 1100. ZONE: I-P:Industrial Park District. The I-P zoning district provides appropriate locations for combining light manufacturing,office and small-scale commercial uses,e.g., restaurants,personal services and fitness centers, in a campus-like setting. Only those light industrial uses with no off-site impacts, e.g., noise, glare, odor, vibration, are permitted in the I-P zone. In addition to mandatory site development review, design and development standards in the I-P zone have been adopted to insure that developments will be well-integrated,attractively landscaped,and pedestrian-friendly. APPLICABLE REVIEW CRITERIA: Community Development Code Chapters 18.360, 18.370, 18.390, 18.530, 18.705, 18.725, 18.730, 18.745, 18.755, 18.765, 18.780, 18.790 and 18.810. YOUR RIGHT TO PROVIDE WRITTEN COMMENTS: Prior to the City making any decision on the Application,you are hereby provided a fourteen(14) day period to submit written comments on the application to the City. THE FOURTEEN (14) DAY PERIOD ENDS AT 5:00 PM ON JANUARY 9, 2007. All comments should be directed to Cheryl Gaines. Assistant Planner in the Planning Division at the City of Tigard, 13125 SW Hall Boulevard, Tigard, Oregon 97223. You may reach the City of Tigard by telephone at 503.639.4171 x2434 or bye-mail to Cherylcatigard-or.gov. ALL COMMENTS MUST BE RECEIVED BY THE CITY OF TIGARD IN WRITING PRIOR TO 5:00 PM ON THE DATE SPECIFIED ABOVE IN ORDER FOR YOUR COMMENTS TO BE CONSIDERED IN THE DECISION MAKING PROCESS THE CITY OF TIGARD APPRECIATES RECEIVING COMMENTS AND VALUES YOUR INPUT. COMMENTS WILL BE CONSIDERED AND ADDRESSED WITHIN THE NOTICE OF DECISION. A DECISION ON THIS ISSUE IS TENTATIVELY SCHEDULED FOR JANUARY 26, 2007. IF YOU PROVIDE COMMENTS, YOU WILL BE SENT A COPY OF THE FULL DECISION ONCE IT HAS BEEN RENDERED. WRI'1'1EN COMMENTS WILL BECOME A PART OF THE PERMANENT PUBLIC RECORD AND SHALL CONTAIN THE FOLLOWING INFORMATION: • Address the specific "Applicable Review Criteria" described in the section above or any other criteria believed to be applicable to this proposal; • Raise any issues and/or concerns believed to be important with sufficient evidence to allow the City to provide a response; • Comments that provide the basis for an appeal to the Tigard Hearings Officer must address the relevant approval criteria with sufficient specificity on that issue. Failure of any party to address the relevant approval criteria with sufficient specificity may preclude subsequent appeals to the Land Use Board of Appeals or Circuit Court on that issue. Specific findings directed at the relevant approval criteria are what constitute relevant evidence. AI.1ER THE 14 DAY COMMENT PERIOD CLOSES,THE DIRECTOR SHALL ISSUE A TYPE II ADMINISTRATIVE DECISION. THE DIRECTOR'S DECISION SHALL BE MAILED TO THE APPLICANT AND TO OWNERS OF RECORD OF PROPERTY LOCATED WITHIN 500 FEET OF THE SUBJECT SITE, AND TO ANYONE ELSE WHO SUBMITTED WRITTEN COMMENTS OR WHO IS OTHERWISE ENTITLED TO NOTICE. THE DIRECTOR'S DECISION SHALL ADDRESS ALL OF THE RELEVANT APPROVAL CRITERIA. BASED UPON THE CRITERIA AND THE FACTS CONTAINED WITHIN THE RECORD, THE DIRECTOR SHALL APPROVE,APPROVE WITH CONDITIONS OR DENY THE REQUESTED PERMIT OR ACTION. SUMMARY OF THE DECISION-MAKING PROCESS: • The application is accepted by the City • Notice is sent to property owners of record within 500 feet of the proposed development area allowing a 14-day written comment period. • The application is reviewed by City Staff and affected agencies. • City Staff issues a written decision. • Notice of the decision is sent to the Applicant and all owners or contract purchasers of record of the site; all owners of record of property located within 500 feet of the site,as shown on the most recent property tax assessment roll;any City-recognized neighborhood group whose boundaries include the site; and any governmental agency which is entitled to notice under an intergovernmental agreement entered into with the City which includes provision for such notice or anyone who is otherwise entitled to such notice. INFORMATION/EVIDENCE AVAILABLE FOR REVIEW: The application,written comments and supporting documents relied upon by the Director to make this decision are contained within the record and are available for public review at the City of Tigard Community Development Department. If you want to inspect'the file, please call and make an appointment with either the project planner or the planning technicians. Copies of these items may be obtained at a cost of$.25 per page or the current rate charged for this service. Questions regarding this application should be directed to the Planning Staff indicated on the first page of this Notice under the section titled "Your Right to Provide Written Comments." lik■111111111 -., .AE........ 4 ,.......•...... . r •`' IICtINITV Z S \ 1P R1006-0001)8 AR2006-00 86 MI :- \\ uS I FTCCH AATTTZ O N . 1111111 ii 1 - -1t, - :1-ei, I ilipli , , , ...I , Let ..t-,;...: e, LIP I �` _ ♦ball;Iii ii 11111 ,.....-., '' Is irmi I \ - lvIIITI1 I •• G O r allinn,aa...all ►! .-\Nrii ;II eillillli r I niq.-+.... i 'a dots:. . • e.r., - REQUEST FOR COMMENTS fr E9T.1900 AL RUGS • CARPETING REr °iv� December 8, 2007 www•atiyehbros.com JAN 0 9 2007 Ms. Cheryl Caines CI?y , Assistant Planner, City of Tigard !ANNInvn, ., , f,�1F C) 13125 SW Hall Blvd. R►Nr Tigard, OR 97223 Re: Site Development Review (SDR) 2006-00008, Variance (VAR) 2006-00086 Paul Schatz Major Modification Dear Cheryl: In general we are supportive and enthused about the addition and improvements outlined in the Paul Schatz Design Review Submittal Site Plan A1.1 dated August 2006 along our property line. It is important to us that all points addressed in the Reciprocal Access and Exclusive Parking Easement Agreement, dated March 31, 2000 between Paca Properties, LLC and Atiyeh Bros., Inc. be followed and adhered to as this project planning moves forward. The site plan as submitted does not comply with the terms as described in section 3 of this document describing the Reciprocal Easement and the sharing of drive aisles for vehicular ingress and egress and turnaround in order to allow access and use of each party's warehouse loading area. Also of concern, is the effect of the potential water run off in the direction of our property created by these modifications. We assume appropriate engineering will eliminate this concern. We have discussed our concerns with Mr. Paul Schatz III and have every reason to believe these items will be addressed, however, we felt it is important to provide timely, written documentation as requested by your notice. Please let us know if we can answer any questions or provide any additional information to help move this project forward. Sincerely, ATIYEH BROS., INC. 3/4,-.,&(-1/1-4,',. Mark K. McGirr Executive Director of Administration and Treasurer CC.: David Atiyeh, Tom Marantette — Atiyeh Bros., Inc Paul Schatz Ill — Paca Properties, LLC. CCB Lic.#3590 RETAIL STORE EUGENE CLEANING FACILITY 6750 SW Bonita Road • Tigard, Oregon 97224 PORTLAND CLEANING FACILITY 564 East 13th•Eugene,Oregon 97401 1516 SE Division Street•Portland,Oregon 97202 Phone:(541)342-3678 Phone: (503) 639-8642 Phone:(503)234-5495 Fax:(541)342-1038 Fax: (503) 639-8688 Fax(503)231-3680 i4 cet-'•-14 p /Lk AJ rho Ljoi it, 4,2 A-t-rs1-41 tY /447d1;- Twos • CARPETING MARK McGIRR Executive Director of Administration&Treasurer 6750 SW Bonita Road Tigard,Oregon 97224 Phone:(503)639-8642 Fax: (503)639-8688 www.atiyehbros.com CLEANING FACILITY 1516 SE Division Street Portland,Oregon 97202 Phone:(503)234-5495 Fax:(503)231-3680 CCB Lic.#3590 Che I Caines-Letter Re Paul Schatz Major Modification Page 1 From: "Mark McGirr <mark©atiyehbros.com> To: <cherylc @tigard-or.gov> Date: 1/9/2007 5:35:38 PM Subject: Letter Re Paul Schatz Major Modification Hello Cheryl: I just noticed that the letter I hand delivered to you today was dated December 8, 2007 instead of January 8, 2007. I have attached a revised letter with the correct date! Thank you. Sincerely. Mark K. McGirr ATIYEH BROS., INC. 14%.;)D6s, • EST. 1900 o ORIENTAL RUGS • CARPETING January 8, 2007 Ms. Cheryl Caines Assistant Planner, City of Tigard 13125 SW Hall Blvd. Tigard, OR 97223 Re: Site Development Review (SDR) 2006-00008, Variance (VAR) 2006-00086 Paul Schatz Major Modification Dear Cheryl: In general we are supportive and enthused about the addition and improvements outlined in the Paul Schatz Design Review Submittal Site Plan A1.1 dated August 2006 along our property line. It is important to us that all points addressed in the Reciprocal Access and Exclusive Parking Easement Agreement, dated March 31, 2000 between Paca Properties, LLC and Atiyeh Bros., Inc. be followed and adhered to as this project planning moves forward. The site plan as submitted does not comply with the terms as described in section 3 of this document describing the Reciprocal Easement and the sharing of drive aisles for vehicular ingress and egress and turnaround in order to allow access and use of each party's warehouse loading area. Also of concern, is the effect of the potential water run off in the direction of our property created by these modifications. We assume appropriate engineering will eliminate this concern. We have discussed our concerns with Mr. Paul Schatz III and have every reason to believe these items will be addressed, however, we felt it is important to provide timely, written documentation as requested by your notice. Please let us know if we can answer any questions or provide any additional information to help move this project forward. Sincerely, ATIYEH BROS., INC. Mark K. McGirr Executive Director of Administration and Treasurer CC.: David Atiyeh, Tom Marantette — Atiyeh Bros., Inc Paul Schatz III — Paca Properties, LLC. MEMORANDUM CITY OF TIGARD, OREGON DATE: 1/16/07 TO: Cheryl Caines, Assistant Planner FROM: Kim McMillan, Development Review Engineer4< RE: SDR2006-00008 Paul Schatz Access Management (Section 18.705.030.H) Section 18.705.030.H.1 states that an access report shall be submitted with all new development proposals which verifies design of driveways and streets are safe by meeting adequate stacking needs, sight distance and deceleration standards as set by ODOT, Washington County, the City and AASHTO. The applicant did not address this section of the code. The applicant shares the driveway with several properties. While the driveway is located within the public ROW the driveway does intersect Sequoia Parkway. To ensure cars can safely exit the shared driveway the applicant's engineer shall submit a preliminary sight distance certification for the intersection of the driveway with Sequoia Parkway with a list of improvements, if required, to achieve the required minimum sight distance. If there are improvements required, i.e. trimming of trees and shrubs, the applicant shall coordinate that work with the property owner(s). The engineer shall submit a final sight distance certification prior to a final building inspection. Section 18.705.030.H.2 states that driveways shall not be permitted to be placed in the influence area of collector or arterial street intersections. Influence area of intersections is that area where queues of traffic commonly form on approach to an intersection. The minimum driveway setback from a collector or arterial street intersection shall be150 feet, measured from the right-of-way line of the intersecting street to the throat of the proposed driveway. The setback may be greater depending upon the influence area, as determined from City Engineer review of a traffic impact report submitted by the applicant's traffic engineer. In a case where a project has less than 150 feet of street frontage, the applicant must explore any option for shared access with the adjacent parcel. If shared access is not possible or practical, the driveway shall be placed as far from the intersection as possible. The applicant did not address this code section. This driveway is unusual in its placement in that is cannot be measured as described above because it is wholly ENGINEERING COMMENTS SDR2006-00008 PAUL SCHATZ PAGE 1 within the ROW. There are no opportunities to move it further away from the intersection of Bonita Road, a Collector, and Sequoia Parkway. Street And Utility Improvements Standards (Section 18.810): Chapter 18.810 provides construction standards for the implementation of public and private facilities and utilities such as streets, sewers, and drainage. The applicable standards are addressed below: Streets: Improvements: Section 18.810.030.A.1 states that streets within a development and streets adjacent shall be improved in accordance with the TDC standards. Section 18.810.030.A.2 states that any new street or additional street width planned as a portion of an existing street shall be dedicated and improved in accordance with the TDC. Minimum Rights-of-Way and Street Widths: Section 18.810.030.E requires a 5-lane Collector Street to have a 96 foot right-of-way width and 68-foot paved section. Other improvements required may include on-street parking, sidewalks and bikeways, underground utilities, street lighting, storm drainage, and street trees. This site lies adjacent to SW Bonita Road, which is classified as a Collector on the City of Tigard Transportation Plan Map. At present, there is approximately 190 feet of ROW, according to the most recent tax assessor's map. This portion of Bonita Road is within ODOT ROW. SW Bonita Road is currently partially. In order to mitigate the impact from this development, the applicant should construct a 6 foot, curb-tight, concrete sidewalk along the Bonita Road frontage. The street trees will be planted behind the sidewalk, thus eliminating the planter strip between the curb and sidewalk. The elimination of the planter strip and the narrower sidewalk, 6 foot rather than 8 foot, is being allowed due to the steep slope from Bonita Road down to the site. All work within the ROW will require a Miscellaneous Permit from ODOT. Future Street Plan and Extension of Streets: Section 18.810.030.F states that a future street plan shall be filed which shows the pattern of existing and proposed future streets from the boundaries of the proposed land division. This section also states that where it is necessary to give access or permit a satisfactory future division of adjoining land, streets shall be extended to the boundary lines of the tract to be developed and a barricade shall be constructed at the end of the street. These street stubs to adjoining properties are not considered to be cul-de-sacs since they are intended to ENGINEERING COMMENTS SDR2006-00008 PAUL SCHATZ PAGE 2 continue as through streets at such time as the adjoining property is developed. A barricade shall be constructed at the end of the street by the property owners which shall not be removed until authorized by the City Engineer, the cost of which shall be included in the street construction cost. Temporary hammerhead turnouts or temporary cul-de-sac bulbs shall be constructed for stub streets in excess of 150 feet in length. The applicant did not address this section. Due to the location of Bonita Road, Interstate 5 and pre-existing development there are no opportunities for future streets or extensions of streets. Street Alignment and Connections: Section 18.810.030.H.1 states that full street connections with spacing of no more than 530 feet between connections is required except where prevented by barriers such as topography, railroads, freeways, pre-existing developments, lease provisions, easements, covenants or other restrictions existing prior to May 1, 1995 which preclude street connections. A full street connection may also be exempted due to a regulated water feature if regulations would not permit construction. Section 18.810.030.H.2 states that all local, neighborhood routes and collector streets which abut a development site shall be extended within the site to provide through circulation when not precluded by environmental or topographical constraints, existing development patterns or strict adherence to other standards in this code. A street connection or extension is precluded when it is not possible to redesign, or reconfigure the street pattern to provide required extensions. Land is considered topographically constrained if the slope is greater than 15% for a distance of 250 feet or more. In the case of environmental or topographical constraints, the mere presence of a constraint is not sufficient to show that a street connection is not possible. The applicant must show why the constraint precludes some reasonable street connection. The applicant did not address this section. Due to the location of Bonita Road, Interstate 5, steep slopes and pre-existing development there are no opportunities to provide street connections. Block Designs - Section 18.810.040.A states that the length, width and shape of blocks shall be designed with due regard to providing adequate building sites for the use contemplated, consideration of needs for convenient access, circulation, control and safety of street traffic and recognition of limitations and opportunities of topography. ENGINEERING COMMENTS SDR2006-00008 PAUL SCHATZ PAGE 3 Block Sizes: Section 18.810.040.B.1 states that the perimeter of blocks formed by streets shall not exceed 1,800 feet measured along the right-of- way line except: • Where street location is precluded by natural topography, wetlands or other bodies of water or, pre-existing development or; • For blocks adjacent to arterial streets, limited access highways, major collectors or railroads. • For non-residential blocks in which internal public circulation provides equivalent access. PLANNING Section 18.810.040.B.2 also states that bicycle and pedestrian connections on public easements or right-of-ways shall be provided when full street connection is not possible. Spacing between connections shall be no more than 330 feet, except where precluded by environmental or topographical constraints, existing development patterns, or strict adherence to other standards in the code. PLANNING Lots - Size and Shape: Section 18.810.060(A) prohibits lot depth from being more than 2.5 times the average lot width, unless the parcel is less than 1.5 times the minimum lot size of the applicable zoning district. PLANNING Lot Frontage: Section 18.810.060(B) requires that lots have at least 25 feet of frontage on public or private streets, other than an alley. In the case of a land partition, 18.420.050.A.4.c applies, which requires a parcel to either have a minimum 15-foot frontage or a minimum 15-foot wide recorded access easement. In cases where the lot is for an attached single-family dwelling unit, the frontage shall be at least 15 feet. PLANNING Sidewalks: Section 18.810.070.A requires that sidewalks be constructed to meet City design standards and be located on both sides of arterial, collector and local residential streets. Private streets and industrial streets shall have sidewalks on at least one side. The applicant's plans indicate they will construct a 6-foot, curb-tight sidewalk along their Bonita Road frontage. The street trees will be planted behind the sidewalk, thus eliminating the planter strip between the curb and sidewalk. The elimination of the planter strip and the narrower sidewalk, 6 foot rather than 8 foot, is being allowed due to the steep slope from Bonita Road down to the site. ENGINEERING COMMENTS SDR2006-00008 PAUL SCHATZ PAGE 4 The distance from the west end of the frontage to the concrete curb return at the intersection of Bonita Road and Sequoia Parkway is approximately 170 feet. 18.810.070.B.2 provides for extending the sidewalk to meet the existing sidewalk. In this case, the asphalt sidewalk does not meet the standards and shall be replaced by the applicant, subject to rough proportionality, with a 6-foot, curb-tight, concrete sidewalk to the concrete curb return. Sanitary Sewers: Sewers Required: Section 18.810.090.A requires that sanitary sewer be installed to serve each new development and to connect developments to existing mains in accordance with the provisions set forth in Design and Construction Standards for Sanitary and Surface Water Management (as adopted by Clean Water Services in 1996 and including any future revisions or amendments) and the adopted policies of the comprehensive plan. Over-sizing: Section 18.810.090.0 states that proposed sewer systems shall include consideration of additional development within the area as projected by the Comprehensive Plan. The applicant did not address this section of the code. There is a public sewer main on the site. The applicant has proposed a new connection from the addition to the public main. Storm Drainage: General Provisions: Section 18.810.100.A requires developers to make adequate provisions for storm water and flood water runoff. Accommodation of Upstream Drainage: Section 18.810.100.0 states that a culvert or other drainage facility shall be large enough to accommodate potential runoff from its entire upstream drainage area, whether inside or outside the development. The City Engineer shall approve the necessary size of the facility, based on the provisions of Design and Construction Standards for Sanitary and Surface Water Management (as adopted by Clean Water Services in 2000 and including any future revisions or amendments). The applicant did not address this section of the code. Runoff from the sloped area adjacent to Bonita Road will be collected on site. There are no major drainage ways that impact this development. Effect on Downstream Drainage: Section 18.810.100.D states that where it is anticipated by the City Engineer that the additional runoff resulting from ENGINEERING COMMENTS SDR2006-00008 PAUL SCHATZ PAGE 5 the development will overload an existing drainage facility, the Director and Engineer shall withhold approval of the development until provisions have been made for improvement of the potential condition or until provisions have been made for storage of additional runoff caused by the development in accordance with the Design and Construction Standards for Sanitary and Surface Water Management (as adopted by Clean Water Services in 2000 and including any future revisions or amendments). In 1997, Clean Water Services (CWS) completed a basin study of Fanno Creek and adopted the Fanno Creek Watershed Management Plan. Section V of that plan includes a recommendation that local governments institute a stormwater detention/effective impervious area reduction program resulting in no net increase in storm peak flows up to the 25-year event. The City will require that all new developments resulting in an increase of impervious surfaces provide onsite detention facilities, unless the development is located adjacent to Fanno Creek. For those developments adjacent to Fanno Creek, the storm water runoff will be permitted to discharge without detention. The applicant's plans indicate they will provide on-site detention by installing an underground pipe on the west side of the development. Bikeways and Pedestrian Pathways: Bikeway Extension: Section 18.810.110.A states that developments adjoining proposed bikeways identified on the City's adopted pedestrian/bikeway plan shall include provisions for the future extension of such bikeways through the dedication of easements or right-of-way. Bonita Road is identified as a Bicycle Facility on Tigard's TSP. Cost of Construction: Section 18.810.110.B states that development permits issued for planned unit developments, conditional use permits, subdivisions, and other developments which will principally benefit from such bikeways shall be conditioned to include the cost or construction of bikeway improvements. The applicant shall provide bicycle striping or pay the fee-in-lieu along their frontage. The amount of the striping would be as follows: • 421 feet of 8-inch white stripe, at $2.50/If $1052.50 • 10 Mono-directional reflective markers @ $4.00/ea $40.00 • 2 Bike lane legends © $175/ea $350.00 • 2 Directional mini-arrows @ $100/ea $200.00 $1642.50 ENGINEERING COMMENTS SDR2006-00008 PAUL SCHATZ PAGE 6 Minimum Width: Section 18.810.110.0 states that the minimum width for bikeways within the roadway is five feet per bicycle travel lane. Minimum width for two-way bikeways separated from the road is eight feet. The minimum width for a bicycle lane along a Collector is 6 feet. Utilities: Section 18.810.120 states that all utility lines, but not limited to those required for electric, communication, lighting and cable television services and related facilities shall be placed underground, except for surface mounted transformers, surface mounted connection boxes and meter cabinets which may be placed above ground, temporary utility service facilities during construction, high capacity electric lines operating at 50,000 volts or above, and: • The developer shall make all necessary arrangements with the serving utility to provide the underground services; • The City reserves the right to approve location of all surface mounted facilities; • All underground utilities, including sanitary sewers and storm drains installed in streets by the developer, shall be constructed prior to the surfacing of the streets; and • Stubs for service connections shall be long enough to avoid disturbing the street improvements when service connections are made. Exception to Under-Grounding Requirement: Section 18.810.120.0 states that a developer shall pay a fee in-lieu of under-grounding costs when the development is proposed to take place on a street where existing utilities which are not underground will serve the development and the approval authority determines that the cost and technical difficulty of under- grounding the utilities outweighs the benefit of under-grounding in conjunction with the development. The determination shall be on a case- by-case basis. The most common, but not the only, such situation is a short frontage development for which under-grounding would result in the placement of additional poles, rather than the removal of above-ground utilities facilities. An applicant for a development which is served by utilities which are not underground and which are located across a public right-of-way from the applicant's property shall pay a fee in-lieu of under- grounding. There are existing overhead utility lines along the frontage of SW Bonita Road. If the fee in-lieu is proposed, it is equal to $ 35.00 per lineal foot of street frontage ENGINEERING COMMENTS SDR2006-00008 PAUL SCHATZ PAGE 7 that contains the overhead lines. The frontage along this site is 421 lineal feet; therefore the fee would be $ 14,735.00. ADDITIONAL CITY AND/OR AGENCY CONCERNS WITH STREET AND UTILITY IMPROVEMENT STANDARDS: Fire and Life Safety: The applicant shall submit a letter of approval from TVFR for the site layout, fire hydrant placement and fire sprinkler requirements prior to issuance of permits. Public Water System: The applicant has not proposed any public water improvements. Storm Water Quality: The City has agreed to enforce Surface Water Management (SWM) regulations established by Clean Water Services (CWS) Design and Construction Standards (adopted by Resolution and Order No. 00-7) which require the construction of on-site water quality facilities. The facilities shall be designed to remove 65 percent of the phosphorus contained in 100 percent of the storm water runoff generated from newly created impervious surfaces. In addition, a maintenance plan shall be submitted indicating the frequency and method to be used in keeping the facility maintained through the year. Prior to construction, the applicant shall submit plans and calculations for a water quality facility that will meet the intent of the CWS Design Standards. In addition, the applicant shall submit a maintenance plan for the facility that must be reviewed and approved by the City prior to construction. The proposed unit from Stormwater Management is acceptable, provided the property owner agrees to hire the manufacturer (or approved equal) to provide the required maintenance of the unit. Prior to a final building inspection, the applicant shall demonstrate that they have entered into a maintenance agreement with Stormwater Management, or another company that demonstrates they can meet the maintenance requirements of the manufacturer. Grading and Erosion Control: ENGINEERING COMMENTS SDR2006-00008 PAUL SCHATZ PAGE 8 CWS Design and Construction Standards also regulate erosion control to reduce the amount of sediment and other pollutants reaching the public storm and surface water system resulting from development, construction, grading, excavating, clearing, and any other activity which accelerates erosion. Per CWS regulations, the applicant is required to submit an erosion control plan for City review and approval prior to issuance of City permits. The Federal Clean Water Act requires that a National Pollutant Discharge Elimination System (NPDES) erosion control permit be issued for any development that will disturb one or more acre of land. Since this site is over five acres, the developer will be required to obtain an NPDES permit from the City prior to construction. This permit will be issued along with the site and/or building permit. Address Assignments: The City of Tigard is responsible for assigning addresses for parcels within the City of Tigard and within the Urban Service Boundary (USB). An addressing fee in the amount of $ 50.00 per address shall be assessed. This fee shall be paid to the City prior to issuance of building permits. The developer will also be required to provide signage at the entrance of each shared flag lot driveway or private street that lists the addresses that are served by the given driveway or street. This will assist emergency services personnel to more easily find a particular home. Recommendations: THE FOLLOWING CONDITIONS SHALL BE SATISFIED PRIOR TO ISSUANCE OF THE SITE PERMIT: Submit to the Engineering Department (Kim McMillan, 639-4171, ext. 2642) for review and approval: Prior to issuance of a site permit, a Public Facility Improvement (PFI) permit is required for this project to cover connection to the public sewer. Three (3) sets of detailed public improvement plans shall be submitted for review to the Engineering Department. NOTE: these plans are in addition to any drawings required by the Building Division and should only include sheets relevant to public improvements. Public Facility Improvement (PFI) permit plans shall conform to City of Tigard Public Improvement Design Standards, which are available at City Hall and the City's web page (www.tigard-or.gov). ENGINEERING COMMENTS SDR2006-00008 PAUL SCHATZ PAGE 9 The PFI permit plan submittal shall include the exact legal name, address and telephone number of the individual or corporate entity who will be designated as the "Permittee", and who will provide the financial assurance for the public improvements. For example, specify if the entity is a corporation, limited partnership, LLC, etc. Also specify the state within which the entity is incorporated and provide the name of the corporate contact person. Failure to provide accurate information to the Engineering Department will delay processing of project documents. Prior to issuance of the Site Permit, the applicant shall obtain a permit from the State of Oregon Highway Division, to perform work within the right-of- way of Bonita Road. A copy of the permit shall be provided to the City Engineering Department. Prior to issuance of the Site Permit, the applicant shall pay the addressing fee. (STAFF CONTACT: Bethany Stewart, Engineering). Prior to issuance of the Site Permit, the applicant's engineer shall provide preliminary sight distance certification for the driveway at Sequoia Parkway, with a list of improvements, if required to meet the minimum sight distance. The applicant shall submit construction plans to ODOT for an ODOT Miscellaneous Permit, indicating that they will construct the following frontage improvements along SW Bonita Road as a part of this project: A. 6-foot concrete sidewalk, curb-tight; and B. street trees behind the sidewalk spaced per TDC requirements. The applicant shall submit construction plans to ODOT for an ODOT Miscellaneous Permit, indicating that they will construct the following frontage improvements along SW Bonita Road as a part of this project: A. 6-foot concrete sidewalk, curb-tight, that extends from the west end of their frontage to the curb return at Sequoia Parkway and Bonita Road. Final design plans and calculations for the proposed private water quality facility shall be submitted to the Engineering Department (Kim McMillan) as a part of the Public Facility Improvement (PH) permit plans. Included with the plans shall be a proposed landscape plan and maintenance plan. An erosion control plan shall be provided as part of the Site Permit drawings. The plan shall conform to the "Erosion Prevention and Sediment Control Design and Planning Manual, February 2003 edition." The applicant shall submit a letter of approval from TVFR for the site layout, fire hydrant placement and fire sprinkler requirements prior to issuance of the Site permit. ENGINEERING COMMENTS SDR2006-00008 PAUL SCHATZ PAGE 10 THE FOLLOWING CONDITIONS SHALL BE SATISFIED PRIOR TO A FINAL BUILDING INSPECTION: Submit to the Engineering Department (Kim McMillan, 639-4171, ext. 2642) for review and approval: Prior to a final building inspection, the applicant shall complete any work in the public right-of-way and submit written approval from ODOT to the Engineering Department. The applicant shall provide signage at the entrance of each shared flag lot driveway or private street that lists the addresses that are served by the given driveway or street. Prior to a final building inspection, the applicant shall pay $1642.50 to the City for the striping of the bike lane along the frontage of Bonita Road or provide the striping. The applicant shall either place the existing overhead utility lines along SW Bonita underground as a part of this project, or they shall pay the fee in-lieu of undergrounding. The fee may be allowed if approved by the City Engineer. The fee shall be calculated by the frontage of the site that is parallel to the utility lines and will be $ 35.00 per lineal foot. If the fee option is approved by the City Engineer, the amount will be $ 14,735.00 and it shall be paid prior to final building inspection. Prior to a final building inspection, the applicant shall demonstrate that they have entered into a maintenance agreement with Stormwater Management, or another company that demonstrates they can meet the maintenance requirements of the manufacturer, for the proposed onsite storm water treatment facility. Prior to a final building inspection, the applicant's engineer shall submit a final sight distance certification for the intersection of the driveway and Sequoia Parkway. ENGINEERING COMMENTS SDR2006-00008 PAUL SCHATZ PAGE 11 ENGINEERING COMMENTS SDR2006-00008 PAUL SCHATZ PAGE 12 • • • RE QUE ST FOR COMME NT S DATE: December 26,2006 TO: Rob Murchison,Public Works Project Engineer FROM City of Tigard Planning Division STAFF CONTACT Cheryl Clines,Assistant Planner(x2437) i Phone: (503) 639-4171 Fax: (503) 24-3681 Email: Cherylcatigard-or.gov SITE DEVELOPMENT REVIEW(SDR) 2006-00008/VARIANCE (VAR) 2006-00086 - PAUL SCHATZ MAJOR MODIFICATION REQUEST: The applicant is requesting approval to construct a 4,746 scuare foot addition to an existing commercial building and to modify the parking areas and drive aisles. A variance has aso been requested to reduce the access width from 50 feet with 40 feet of pavement to 37 feet with 30 feet of pavement. LOCATION: 6600 SW Bonita Road; Washington County Tax Map 2S112AD, Tax Lot 1100. ZONE: I P: Industrial Park District. The I-P zoning district provides appropriate locations for combining light manufacturing office and small-scale commercial uses,e.g.,restaurants, personal services and fitness centers,in a campus-like setting. Only those light industrial uses with no off-site impacts,e.g. noise, glare, odor, vibration are permitted in the I-P zone.in addition to mandatory site development review, design and development standards in tie I-P zone have been adopted to insure that developments will be well-integrated, attractively landscaped, and edestrian-friendly. APPPLICABLE REVIEW CRITERIA: Community Development Code Chapters 18.360, 1.370, 18.390, 18.530, 18.705, 18.725, 18.730, 18.745, 18.755, 18.765, 18.780, 18.790 and 18:810. Attached are the Site Plan, Vicinity Map and Applicant's Materials for your review. From information supplied by various departments and agencies and from other information available to our staff,a report and recommendation will be prepared and a decision will be rendered on the proposal in the near future. If you wish to comment on this application, WE NEED YOUR COMMENTS BACK BY: JANUARY 9., 2007. You may use the space provided below or attach a separate letter to return your comments. If you are unable to respond by the above date,please phone the staff contact noted above with your comments and confirm your comments in writing as soon as possible. If you have any questions,contact the Tigard Planning Division, 13125 SW Hall Boulevard,Tigard,OR 97223. PLEASE CHECK THE FOLLOWING ITEMS THAT APPLY: We have reviewed the proposal and have no objections to it. _ Please contact of our office. Please refer to the enclosed letter or email. i `Written comments provided below: Name&Number of Person Commenting: •1y04 6,,71.1$ ... ! • 779.L `I' I IG: I/r I.OV I �r I I i \ A® ';' /<r ,!y I11 801 I if R a...,3 i '! ..'.1--- I :8Q-1 11 179.11 G i T. FIRE !i H ► 17 / ,; 76.f / CONCRETE CUR j• « _�RAi ®_ate®� - _ - NG 1<c)I-j - �1 11� I WAE • _..:. JM II L4 •B`r 1 w gt �Bl-Ri•_� �1Y� iniesL7.'!!®� ��il a._-.'m &�, t,•, -A -1 '3.5',' QMAT!'``'�i ;61, __ mi r as 1 6G � Anwar r� '' - i10►!�+�.as.:�1.5 167.1a 165 • � 6 � rir � ! r..��. ��� �. ���...��. ,-7! s [7�. I IiiP4it�! �• '9 '� 1 al 180.66 i ! '' 1 � �0 . 179.93 G l i ! t���.'�`�� �� �1.`�'1 1��� /W®�! -., I ti'\Y .�� 179.78• f h r `,`�\\\ e�a�V' •�► I 1� f. ' NG 1 I 6; i� ' ` j L ! I w (titr '.:,m-,:t 6" SD ®' 93% 1 180.09 q7 L, I !i 1176.0 I I � '' o s E r ;I ( _, C7 + . ;' I ',LU j17{I1 i t arce1 1 I ! 1. 1 , j ! » 1 ! . . r 181.25 I • I1 1 FIRE SUPPRESSION FOR LISSNN 8 0 7 TC o ' ' ii 0 _�f r 175.0 � _1 PROPOSED EXPANSION TO �, 18 40 G -, �'•H ' iliIi BE PROVIDED FROM EXISTING 1 ` . _ 181 0 180.33 r j`'• I•r8!' I I i g ' �.t BUILDING FIRE SYSTEM. 18 . I { I -� I- SEE PLUMBING PLAN. I 1 , 180.44• iI\ ril I ,,ITII� PIPE © 0 1 ! I 17 ., AC Lj: I ` FF 178.28 •r ■ ■� NG � 181.90 71.27 G • I'- .1 1I a I 11174„!.,?‘1 /� FF=X73.60 �o 6- -A' 'sue Li 9 "' �'F ► _ - 11' , . f Ln I . [: ! Li-1 175.8• �� ? i .,� i I IhI : EXISTING ,1111 mu ✓�I ' r IE: •7.10 1 180.91• ! I O , BUILDING I r . N i \ .J` 'cq V'• i 181.Q ! Z ®INT a.S. i V`� �'- ■= 173.60 i( CONNECT i :€frA:D 182.46 I• j R; �o '5 INSTALL PRIVATE WATER METER 7 /7 V� ,�`� i I W - t° I A AND BOX. CONTRACTOR TO �� � � I 131.11.r3.I . / I i ~ _ VERIFY SIZE AND LOCATION . �" 4-1-1 l- Iii , !` PRIOR TO CONSTRUCTION OR (J ! - I NG (f) Ct ORDERING MATERIALS. J� I_ •Pilli i i L 6•� D ® 93% C� 181.09• 181.34 G• I 1 J I LA ._� ��I�• w 1 •I •i •. 183.07 Z )8i i . '' r Q, jam '6 V '�� r�� ��� ' _ [ ."� L U I t .79 G u� � •0 •,9 -0 .65 0 1 5. �DMii 1 �. CO X , ,5 4IMMIt 48" ACCESS MH 1 , 1 6s G ' �,� �° i RIM 172. 80 (MATCH EXIST.) '' --- W /A .�i S ---,.`1S :,. � IE:165.60 I i I \ I i ,i I i i �_©{) I.. G j in.. ., 183.56 3 06 ., AC v' I / ' �"� j XI ST. FI I - , EXTRUDED it{ �rialir\l' �i-IYDRAI�tT 1 53 173.97 CURB .- , Ii__jj , I 5' I5. • 178.26 Bt4 I'.28 Tii\!182.03 TC j I ! /) t73.•r G ' 1:� u - si • e. 158 G ill ,, ,,,1 GC) I \i ... .,C• ' t ra ill�ii� „t'! ' x AK 9e�u�■� 1111 • 181.70 - i i;- �,.j I 173.71. 174.1- G ..��IM�illl�k►l�i.11� 178.11111,54�s TC 181.89 .73• / / , l • 17 .13 _.�_ - ^I • 81. G - �1! " �� 184.10 WASH CO LAND DEV. Fax:503-846-2908 Jan 12 2007 10:46 P. 01 REQUEST FOR COMME NTS RECEIVED DATE: Decemb_er-26,2006 DLr:Trans? TO Steve Conway, a hington Co tnnt.of Land YJss&Transportation t�"ar,d Use a :otirtatioL4i `''-'v'ca8 n FROM City of Tigard Planning Division STAFF CONTACT: Sines Assistant Planner4371 Phone: (503) 639-4171 Fax; (503) 624-3681 Email: Chervlcatigard-or. ov SITE DEVELOPMENT REVIEW(SDR) 2006-00008/VARIANCE (VAR) 2006-00086 PAUL SCHATZ MAJOR MODIFICATION RE• • -: - e app cant is requesting approN,. to construct a 4,746 square oot as• ton to an existing commerc - buil.ing and to modnly the parking areas and drive aisles. A variance has also been requested to reduce the access width from 50 feet with 40 feet of pavement to 37 feet with 30 feet of pavement. LOCATION: 6600 SW Bonita Rod; Washington County Tax Map 2S112AD, Tax Lot 1100. ZONE: [-P: Industrial Park District. The I-P zoning district provides appropriate locations for combining light manufacturing office and small-scale commercial uses,e.g.; restaurants, personal services and fitness centers,in a campus-like setting. Only those light industrial uses with no off-site impacts, e.g. noise, glare, odor,vibration are permitted in the I-P zone.In addition to mandatory site development review,design and development standards in the I-P zone have been adopted to insure that developments will be well-integrated, attractively landscaped, and pedestrian-friendly.. APPPLICABLE REVIEW CRITE 'Rik Community Development Code Cha•ters 18.360, 1370, 18.390, 18.30, 18.7005, 18.725, 18.730, 18.745, 18.755, 18.765, 18.780, 18.790 and 18:810. Attached are the Site Plan, Vicinity Map and Applicant's Materials for your review. From information supplied by various departments and agencies and from other information available to our staff, a report and recommendation will be prepared and a decision will be rendered on the proposal in the near future. If you wish to comment on this application, WE NEED YOUR COMMENTS BACK BY: JANUARY 91, 2007, You may use the space provided below or attach a separate letter to return your comments. If j.i are unable to respond the above date, please phone the staff contact noted above with your comments and confirm your comments in writing as soon as possible. If you have any questions,contact the Tigard Planning Division, 13125 SW Hall Boulevard,Tigard,OR 97223. 'PLEASE CHECK THE FOLLOWING ITEMS THAT APPLY: We have reviewed the proposal and have no objections to it. Please contact _ of our office. Please refer to the enclosed letter or email. Written comments provided below; Name&Number of Person Commcntin3: k NMIN 771n1mmi le a I 71V r1T liar 11 I I I ,1 REQUEST FOR COMMENTS DATE: December 26,2006 TO: Mark Vandomelen,Rol Plans Examines s N pa✓ssat FROM: City of Tigard Planning Division STAFF CONTACT: Cheryl Caines,Assistant Planner(x2437) Phone: (503) 639-4171 Fax: (503) 624-3681 Email: Cherylcatigard-or.gov SITE DEVELOPMENT REVIEW(SDR) 2006-00008/VARIANCE (VAR) 2006-00086 - PAUL SCHATZ MAJOR MODIFICATION REQUEST: The applicant is requesting approval to construct a 4,746 square foot addition to an existing commercial building and to modify the parking areas and drive aisles. A variance has also been requested to reduce the access width from 50 feet with 40 feet of pavement to 37 feet with 30 feet of pavement. LOCATION: 6600 SW Bonita Road; Washington County Tax Map 2S112AD, Tax Lot 1100. ZONE: I P: Industrial Park District. The I-P zoning district provides appropriate locations for combining light manufacturing office and small-scale commercial uses, e.g., restaurants, personal services and fitness centers,in a campus-like setting. Onl those light industrial uses with no off-site impacts,e.g. , . y noise, glare, odor,vibration are permitted in the I-P zone.In addition to mandatory site development review, design and development standards in tie I-1' zone have been adopted to insure that developments will be well-integrated, attractively landscaped, and edestrian-friendly. APPPLICABTLE REVIEW CRITERIA: Community Development Code Chapters 18.360, 18.370, 18.390, 18.530, 18.705, 18.725, 18.730, 18.745, 18.755, 18.765, 18.780, 18.790 and 18.810. Attached are the Site Plan, Vicinity Map and Applicant's Materials for your review. From information supplied by various departments and agencies and from other information available to our staff,a report and recommendation will be prepared and a decision will be rendered on the proposal in the near future. If you wish to comment on this application, WE NEED YOUR COMMENTS BACK BY: JANUARY 9., 2007. You may use the space provided below or attach a separate letter to return your comments. If you are unable to respond by the above date,please phone the staff contact noted above with your comments and confirm your comments in writing as soon as possible. If you have any questions,contact the Tigard Planning Division, 13125 SW Hall Boulevard,Tigard,OR 97223. PLEASE CHECK THE FOLLOWING ITEMS THAT APPLY: We have reviewed the proposal and have no objections to it. Please contact of our office. Please refer to the enclosed letter or email. Written comments provided below Name&Number of Person Commenting: Mme✓ X 7S, CITY of TIGARD 444, GEOGRAPHIC INFORMATION SYSTEM VICINITY MAP Inn 111 P SDR2006_0000 6 SW w MEADOWS NO VAR2006 0008 PAUL SCHATZ MODOIFICATION _ ii Eli BONITA-a XXX\ • r f /s! {c iI :i: I :i imam, somi .■41 "P 4001 12.AiF Imlice dila � sow NM IIdBE L.,. O_ 11 U g/ Tigard Area Map < PIIIIIRIiIiIIIIIII N m PIIIVIIii.i, 4 CARDINAL LN �. � ►, 0 200 400 60o Feat tr. _ „ M V=486 feet 11118‘ TIGARD Information on this map is for general location only and REDIIt4* should be ver tied with the Development Services Division. 7 agar,SW O H 9ll 23d T(503)OR 9171 MIR � (503)639gard htlp:fMvw.ci.tigard.or.us Community Development Plot date:Dec 22,2006;C:lmagicMAGIC03.APR r • • REQUEST FOR COMMENTS DATE: December 26.2006 TO: Jim Wolf.Tigard Police Department Crime Prevention Officer FROM City of Tigard Planning Division STAFF CONTACT: Cheryl Caines.Assistant Planner(x2437) Phone: (503) 639-4171 Fax: (503) 624-3681 Email:Cherylc @tigard-or.gov SITE DEVELOPMENT REVIEW(SDR) 2006-00008/VARIANCE (VAR) 2006-00086 - PAUL SCHATZ MAJOR MODIFICATION REQUEST: The applicant is requesting approval to construct a 4,746 square foot addition to an existing commercial building and to modify the parking areas and drive aisles. A variance has also been requested to reduce the access width from 50 feet with 40 feet of pavement to 37 feet with 30 feet of pavement. LOCATION: 6600 SW Bonita Road; Washington County Tax Map 2S112AD, Tax Lot 1100. ZONE: f P: Industrial Park District. The I-P zoning district provides appropriate locations for combining light manufacturing office and small-scale commercial uses,e.g., restaurants, personal services and fitness centers, in a campus-like setting. Only those light industrial uses with no off-site impacts,e.g. noise, glare, odor, vibration are permitted in the I-P zone.In addition to mandatory site development review,design and development standards in tie I-P zone have been adopted to insure that developments will be well-integrated, attractively landscaped, and edestrian-friendly.. APPPLICABLE REVIEW CRITERIA: Community Development Code Chapters 18.360, 1-8.370, 18.390, 18.530, 18.705, 18.725, 18.730, 18.745, 18.755, 18.765, 18.780, 18.790 and 18:810. Attached are the Site Plan, Vicinity Map and Applicant's Materials for your review. From information supplied by various departments and agencies and from other information available to our staff,a report and recommendation will be prepared and a decision will be rendered on the proposal in the near future. If you wish to comment on this application, WE NEED YOUR COMMENTS BACK BY: JANUARY 9., 2007. You may use the space provided below or attach a separate letter to return your comments. If you are unable to respond by the above date,please phone the staff contact noted above with your comments and confirm your comments in writing as soon as possible. If you have any questions,contact the Tigard Planning Division, 13125 SW Hall Boulevard,Tigard,OR 97223. PLEASE CHECK THE FOLLOWING ITEMS THAT APPLY: We have reviewed the proposal and have no objections to it. Please contact of our office. _ Please refer to the enclosed letter or email. Written comments provided below: Name&Number of Person Commenting: 3 ANI01-c 503 '11% a5t, .F f.- 11 / REQUEST FOR COMMENTS DATE: December 26,2006 TO: PER ATTACHED FROM City of Tigard Planning Division STAFF CONTACT: Cheryl Gaines,Assistant Planner(x2437) Phone: (503) 639-4171 Fax: (503) 624-3681 Email:Cherylcatigard-or.gov SITE DEVELOPMENT REVIEW(SDR) 2006-00008/VARIANCE (VAR) 2006-00086 - PAUL SCHATZ MAJOR MODIFICATION REQUEST: The applicant is requesting approval to construct a 4,746 scuare foot addition to an existing commercial building and to modify the parking areas and drive aisles. A variance has aso been requested to reduce the access width from 50 feet with 40 feet of pavement to 37 feet with 30 feet of pavement. LOCATION: 6600 SW Bonita Road; Washington County Tax Map 2S112AD, Tax Lot 1100. ZONE: [-P: Industrial Park District. The I-P zoning district provides appropriate locations for combining light manufacturing office and small-scale commercial uses,e.g., restaurants, personal services and fitness centers,in a campus-like setting. Only those light industrial uses with no off-site impacts,e.g. noise, glare, odor, vibration are permitted in the I-P zone.In addition to mandatory site development review, design and development standards in the I-P zone have been adopted to insure that developments will be well-integrated, attractively landscaped, and pedestrian-friendly. APPPLICABLE REVIEW CRITERIA: Community Development Code Chapters 18.360, 1.370, 18.390, 18.530, 18.705, 18.725, 18.730, 18.745, 18.755, 18.765, 18.780, 18.790 and 18:810. Attached are the Site Plan, Vicinity Map and Applicant's Materials for your review. From information supplied by various departments and agencies and from other information available to our staff,a report and recommendation will be prepared and a decision will be rendered on the proposal in the near future. If you wish to comment on this application, WE NEED YOUR COMMENTS BACK BY: JANUARY 9., 2007. You may use the space provided below or attach a separate letter to return your comments. If you are unable to respond by the above date,please phone the staff contact noted above with your comments and confirm your comments in writing as soon as possible. If you have any questions,contact the Tigard Planning Division, 13125 SW Hall Boulevard,Tigard,OR 97223. PLEASE CHECK THE FOLLOWING ITEMS THAT APPLY: We have reviewed the proposal and have no objections to it. Please contact of our office. — Please refer to the enclosed letter or email. Written comments provided below: Name&Number of Person Commenting: r'TY OF TIGARD REQUEST FOP ''OMMENTS NOTIFICA. , LIST FOR LAND USE & COMMUNITY DE .JPMENT APPLICATIONS 1 FILE NOS.: 5 DR a ODCto _DBE) FILE NAME: ?aJ-1 6 4-4-2 d neA, Ji MD CITIZEN INVOLVEMENT TEAMS 14-DAY PENDING APPLICATION NOTICE TO INTERESTED PARTIES OF AREA: ❑Central ❑East ❑South ❑West CITY OFFICES LONG RANGE PLANNING/Ron Bunch,Planning Mgr. _COMMUNITY DVLPMNT.DEPT./Planning-Engineering Techs. POLICE DEPT./Jim Wolf,Crime Prevention Officer BUILDING DIVISION/Mark(residential)Brian(commercial) ENGINEERING DEPT./Kim McMillan,Dvlpmnt.Review Engineer _PUBLIC WORKS/Matt Stine,Urban Forester _CITY ADMINISTRATION/Cathy Wheatley,City Recorder . PUBLIC WORKS/Rob Murchison.Project Engineer _PLANNING COMMISSION(+11 sets) _/PLANNER—POST PROJECT SITE 10 BUSINESS DAYS PRIOR TO A PUBLIC HEARING! _HEARINGS OFFICER(+2 sets) SPECIAL DISTRICTS _ TUAL.HILLS PARK&REC.DIST.41),L TUALATIN VALLEY FIRE&RESCUE • _ TUALATIN VALLEY WATER DISTRICT* .z CLEAN WATER SERVICES* Planning Manager North Division Administrative Office Lee Walker/SWM Program 15707 SW Walker Road John K.Dalby,Deputy Fire Marshall PO Box 745 155 N.First Avenue Beaverton,OR 97006 14480 SW Jenkins Road Beaverton,OR 97075 Hillsboro,OR 97124 Beaverton,OR 97005-1152 LOCAL AND STATE JURISDICTIONS CITY OF BEAVERTON * _ CITY OF TUALATIN * _OR.DEPT.OF FISH&WILDLIFE _OR.DIV.OF STATE LANDS — Planning Manager Planning Manager Devin Simmons,Habitat Biologist Melinda Wood(WLUN Form Required) — Steven Sparks,oev Svcs.Manager 18880 SW Martinazzi Avenue North Willamette Watershed District 775 Summer Street NE,Suite 100 PO Box 4755 Tualatin,OR 97062 18330 NW Sauvie Island Road Salem,OR 97301-1279 Beaverton,OR 97076 Portland,OR 97231 OR.PUB.UTILITIES COMM. METRO-LAND USE&PLANNING * _OR.DEPT.OF GEO.&MINERAL IND. 550 Capitol Street NE _ CITY OF DURHAM * 600 NE Grand Avenue 800 NE Oregon Street,Suite 5 Salem,OR 97310-1380 City Manager Portland,OR 97232-2736 Portland,OR 97232 17160 SW Upper Boones Fry.Rd. _ Bob Knight,Data Resource center(ZCA) _US ARMY CORPS.OF ENG. Durham,OR 97224 _ Paulette Allen,Growth Management Coordinator _OR.DEPT.OF LAND CONSERV.&DVLP. Kathryn Harris(Maps acws Letter Only) _ Mel Huie,Greenspaces Coordinator(cPA1zOA) Larry French(Comp.Plan Amendments Only) Routing CENWP-OP-G _CITY OF KING CITY * _ Jennifer Budhabhatti,Regional Planner(Wetlands) 635 Capitol Street NE,Suite 150 PO Box 2946 City Manager _ C.D.Manager,Growth Management Services Salem,OR 97301-2540 Portland,OR 97208-2946 q 15300 SW 116th Avenue King City,OR 97224 WASHINGTON COUNTY _ OR.DEPT.OF ENERGY(Powerlines in Areal _OR.DEPT OF AVIATION(Monopole Towers) Dept.of Land Use&Transp. Bonneville Power Administration Tom Highland,Planning 155 N.First Avenue CITY OF LAKE OSWEGO* Routing TTRC–Attn: Renae Ferrera 3040 25th Street,SE Suite 350,MS 13 Planning Director PO Box 3621 Salem,OR 97310 Hillsboro,OR 97124 PO Box 369 Portland,OR 97208-3621 /Steve Conway(General Apps.) Lake Oswego,OR 97034 _Gregg Leion(CPA) _ OR.DEPT.OF ENVIRON.QUALITY(DEQ) ODOT,REGION 1 * _Brent Curtis(cpA) —CITY OF PORTLAND (Notify for Wetlands and Potential Environmental Impacts) ,(Development Review Coordinator _Dona Mateja(Z A)MS 14 Planning Bureau Director Regional Administrator _Carl Torland, Right-of-Way Section(vacaroes) Sr.Cartographer ic,A¢cA)Ms t. 1900 SW 4'h Avenue,Suite 4100 2020 SW Fourth Avenue,Suite 400 123 NW Flanders _Jim Nims,swveyortzcA,Msts Portland,OR 97201 Portland,OR 97201-4987 Portland,OR 97209-4037 _OR.PARKS&REC.DEPT. _WA.CO.CONSOL.COMM.AGNCY ./ODOT,REGION 1 -DISTRICT 2A* _ODOT,RAIL DIVISION STATE HISTORIC Dave Austin(wcccA)°a11°0Men.,w.,w.w Sam Hunaidi,Assistant District Manager (Notify 1 ODOT R/R•Hwy.Crossing is Only Access to Land) PRESERVATION OFFICE PO Box 6375 6000 SW Raab Road Dave Lanning,Sr crossing Safely specialist (Notify if Property Has HD Overlay) Beaverton,OR 97007-0375 Portland,OR 97221 555-13th Street,NE,Suite 3 725 Sumner Street NE,Suite C Salem,OR 9 7301-41 79 Salem,OR 97301 UTILITY PROVIDERS AND SPECIAL AGENCIES _PORTLAND WESTERN R/R,BURLINGTON NORTHERN/SANTA FE R/R,OREGON ELECTRIC R/R(Burlington Northern/Santa Fe R/R Predecessor) Bruce Carswell,President&General Manager 1200 Howard Drive SE Albany,OR 97322-3336 —SOUTHERN PACIFIC TRANS.CO.R/R _METRO AREA COMMUNICATIONS /COMCAST CABLE CORP. ZRI-MET TRANSIT DVLPMT. Clifford C.Cabe,Construction Engineer Debra Palmer(Annexabnnsonly) Gerald Backhaus is..M.vk„A,e.w,tra, (If Protect is Within%Mile of a Transit Route) 5424 SE McLoughlin Boulevard Twin Oaks Technology Center 14200 SW Brigadoon Court Ben Baldwin,Project Planner 7 Portland,OR 97232 1815 NW 169th Place,S-6020 Beaverton,OR 97005 710 NE Holladay Street Beaverton,OR 97006-4886 Portland.OR 97232 PORTLAND GENERAL ELECTRIC v/NW NATURAL GAS COMPANY ZVERIZON (MC030533) ZQWEST COMMUNICATIONS Ken Gutierrez,Svc.Design Consultant Scott Palmer,Engineering Coord. Brandon Kahler,Engineering Lynn Smith,Eng.ROW Mgr. 9480 SW Boeckman Road 220 NW Second Avenue 20575 Vonnewmann Dr.,Suite 150 8021 SW Capitol Hill Rd,Rm 110 Wilsonville,OR 97070 Portland,OR 97209-3991 Beaverton,OR 97075-1100 Portland,OR 97219 _TIGARD/TUALATIN SCHOOL DIST.#23J _BEAVERTON SCHOOL DIST.#48 _✓COMCAST CABLE CORP. _COMCAST CABLE COMMUNIC. Teri Brady,Administrative Offices Jan Youngquist,Demographics Alex Silantiev ,see Man to Area Contact) Diana Carpenter iApnse otnans of 9vwt 6960 SW Sandburg Street 16550 SW Merlo Road 9605 SW Nimbus Avenue,Bldg.12 10831 SW Cascade Avenue Tigard,OR 97223-8039 Beaverton,OR 97006-5152 Beaverton,OR 97008 Tigard,OR 97223-4203 * INDICATES AUTOMATIC NOTIFICATION IN COMPLIANCE WITH INTERGOVERNMENTAL AGREEMENT IF WITHIN 500'OF THE SUBJECT PROPERTY FOR ANY/ALL CITY PROJECTS (Project Planner Is Responsible For Indicating Parties To Notify). h:\patty\masters\Request For Comments Notification List.doc (UPDATED: 8-Nov-06) MAILING RECORDS r • Elpil AFFIDAVIT OF MAILING I, Patricia L. Lunsford, being first duly sworn/affirm, on oath depose and say that I am a Senior Administrative Specialist for the City of Tigard,Washington County,Oregon and that I served the following: I(i ek ApPrapri re Box(s) ebw) © NOTICE OF DECISION FOR SDR2006-00008/VAR2006-00086-PAUL SCEIATZ FURNITURE MAJOR MODIFICATION (File No/Name Reference) 0 AMENDED NOTICE ® City of Tigard Planning Director A copy of the said notice being hereto attached,marked Exhibit"A",and by reference made a part hereof,was mailed to each named person(s) at the address(s) shown on the attached list(s),marked Exhibit"B",and by reference made a part hereof,on February 28,2007,and deposited in the United States Mail on February 28,2007,postage prepaid.— ..-61 1 . / ; &'*47L/ (Person .t Pre..r,• . .lice) of / STATE OF OREGON County of Washington ss. City of Tigard _ Subscribed and sworn/affirmed before me on the 7 day of C�/!/( ,2007. 0:� OFFICIAL SEAL J/ l �C�,,��.�-,�- DIANE M JELDERKS J '..3� NOTARY PUBLIC-OREGON 9 / 1 COMMISSION NO.373021N (! �J� 1 MY COMMISSION EXPIRES SEPT.25,2007( Z u I( / -�-`-���-�-�- -`-,-�-`��I NOTARY P LI• •' ORE GO My Commission Expires: '' O EXHIBIT 14 NOTICE OF TYPE II DECISION SITE DEVELOPMENT REVIEW(SDR) 2006-00008 PAUL SCHATZ FURNITURE MAJOR MODIFICATION (Includes a 30-day extension) 120 DAYS = 5/14/2007 SECTION I. APPLICATION SUMMARY FILE NAME: PAUL SCHATZ FURNITURE MAJOR MODIFICATION CASE NOS.: Site Development Review(SDR) SDR2006-00008 Variance (VAR) VAR2006-00086 PROPOSAL: The applicant is requesting Site Development Review approval to construct a 4,746 square foot addition to an existing commercial building and to modify the parking areas and drive aisles. A Variance has also been requested to reduce the access width from 50 feet with 40 feet of pavement to 37 feet with 30 feet of pavement. OWNER: PACA Properties,LLC 6600 SW Bonita Rd. Tigard,OR 97224 APPLICANT: Mildren Design Group,P.C. Attn: Gene Mildren 7650 SW Beveland St.,Suite 120 Tigard,OR 97223 LOCATION: 6600 SW Bonita Road;WCTM 2S112AD,Tax Lot 1100. ZONE: I-P: Industrial Park District. The I-P zoning district provides appropriate locations for combining light manufacturing, office and small-scale commercial uses, e.g., restaurants, personal services and fitness centers, in a campus-like setting. Only those light industrial uses with no off-site impacts, e.g., noise, glare, odor, vibration are permitted in the I-P zone. In addition to mandatory site development review, design and development standards in the I-P zone have been adopted to insure that developments will be well-integrated,attractively landscaped,and pedestrian-friendly. APPLICABLE REVIEW CRITERIA: Community Development Code Chapters 18.360, 18.370, 18.390, 18.530, 18.705, 18.725, 18.745, 18.755, 18.765, 18.780, 18.790, 18.795 and 18.810. SECTION II. DECISION Notice is hereby iven that the City of Tigard Community Development Director's designee has APPROVED the above request subject to certain conditions of approval. The findings and conclusions on which the decision is based are noted in Section VI. NOTICE OF TYPE II DECISION SDR2006-00008/PAUL SCHATZ MAJOR MODIFICATION PAGE 1 OF 24 CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL THE FOLLOWING CONDITIONS SHALL BE SATISFIED PRIOR TO THE ISSUANCE OF SITE/BUILDING PERMITS: Submit to the Planning Division(Cheryl Caines, 639-4171,ext. 2437)for review and approval: 1. Prior to site work the applicant must submit a revised landscape plan for review and approval that shows street trees along SW Bonita Road as 3 inch caliper per 18p530.050.B. 2. Prior to commencing site work, the applicant shall pay a mitigation fee-in-lieu for the value of 26.25 caliper inches (26.25 x$125=$3,281.25). 3. Tree Protection- Prior to any site work the applicant shall install all proposed tree protection fencing. The fencing shall be inspected and approved by the Project Arborist and City Planner, Cheryl Caines, prior to commencing any site work. The tree protection fencing shall remain in place through the duration of all of the building construction phases, until the Certificate of Occupancy has been approved. 4. Prior to issuance of building permits, the applicant shall submit site plan drawings indicating the location of the trees that were preserved on the lot during site development, location of tree protection fencing, and a signature of approval from the project arborist regarding the placement and construction techniques to be employed in building the structures. All proposed protection fencing shall be installed and inspected prior to commencing construction. The fencing shall remain in place through the duration of all of the building construction phases,until the Certificate of Occupancy has been approved. After approval from City Staff,the tree protection measures maybe removed. 5. Prior to building permit issuance, the applicant shall provide documentation of an adequate on-going maintenance program for the landscape areas. 6. Submit a detailed plan for review and approval that shows all new service facilities including air conditioning units,HVAC,and gas meters,are screened from public view. 7. Submit detailed plans for review and approval that shows the location of the two small dumpsters used for trash collection. If screening is required,it must be shown on the plans. 8. Prior to issuance of building/site ermits, the applicant shall submit plans for review and approval that show the direction of flow and signage details for the one-way access drive. 9. Prior to issuance of building/site permits, the applicant shall submit information stating the number of long-term parking spaces-being provided. If this number exceeds 20,then a revised site plan must be submitted for review and approval that shows how the carpooVvanpool parking standards are met. 10. Provide a detail of the bike racks to be used for review and approval by the City. 11. Prior to any Certificates of Occupancy, the applicant shall ensure that the Project Arborist has submitted written reports to the Planning Department (Cheryl Caines), at least, once every two weeks, from initial tree protection zone (TPZ) fencin installation,t Trough the building construction phases, as he monitors the construction activities and progress. This inspection will be to evaluate the tree protection fencing, determine if the fencing was moved at any point during construction, and determine if any part of the Tree Protection Plan has been violated. These reports must be provided to the City until the time of the issuance of any Certificates of Occupancy.. The reports shall include any changes that occurred to the TPZ as well as the condition and location of the tree protection fencing. If the amount of TPZ was reduced then the Project Arborist shall justify why the fencing was moved, and shall certify that the construction activities to the trees did not adversely impact the overall,long-term health and stability of the tree(s). NOTICE OF TYPE II DEQSION SDR2006-00008/PAUL SQHATZ MAJOR MODIFICATION PAGE 2 OF 24 If the reports are not submitted or received by the City Planner at the scheduled intervals, and if it appears the TPZ's or the Tree Protection Plan are not being followed by the contractor or a sub- contractor, the City can stop work on the project until an inspection can be done by City Staff and the Project Arbonst. Prior to issuance of any Certificates of Occupancy, the Project Arbonst will submit a final certification indicating the elements of the Tree Protection Plan were followed and that all remaining trees on the site are healthy, stable and viable in their modified growing environment. Submit to the Engineering Department (Kim McMillan, 639-4171, ext. 2642) for review and approval: 12. Prior to issuance of a site permit a Public Facility Improvement (PFI) permit is required for this project to cover connection to tie public sewer. Three (3) sets of detailed public improvement plans shall be submitted for review to the Engineering Department. NO1E: these plans are in addition to any drawings required by the Building Division and should only include sheets relevant to public improvements. Public Facility Improvement (PFI) permit plans shall conform to City of Tigard Public Improvement Design Standards, which are available at City Hall and the City's web page (www.tigard-or.gov). 13. The PHI permit plan submittal shall include the exact legal name, address and telephone number of the individual or corporate entity who will be designated as the "Permittee", and who will provide the financial assurance for the public improvements. For example, specify if the entity is a corporation limited partnership, LLC, etc. Also specify the state within which the entity is incorporated and provide the name of the corporate contact person. Failure to provide accurate information to the Engineering Department will delay processing of project documents. 14. Prior to issuance of the Site Permit, the applicant shall obtain a permit from the State of Oregon Highway Division, to perform work within the right-of-way of Bonita Road. A copy of the permit shall be provided to the City Engineering Department. 15. Prior to issuance of the Site Permit, the applicant shall pay the addressing fee. (STAFF CONTACT: Bethany Stewart,Engineering). 16. Prior to issuance of the Site Permit, the applicant's engineer shall provide preliminary sight distance certification for the driveway at Sequoia Parkway,with a list of improvements, if required to meet the minimum sight distance. 17. The applicant shall submit construction plans to ODOT for an ODOT Miscellaneous Permit, indicaung, that they will construct the following frontage improvements along SW Bonita Road as a part of this project: A. 6-foot concrete sidewalk,curb-tight;and B. street trees behind the sidewalk spaced per TDC requirements. 18. The applicant shall submit construction plans to ODOT for an ODOT Miscellaneous Permit, indicating that they will construct the following frontage improvements along SW Bonita Road as a part of this project: A. 6-foot concrete sidewalk, curb-tight, that extends from the west end of their frontage to the curb return at Sequoia Parkway and Bonita Road. 19. Final design plans and calculations for the proposed private water quality facility shall be submitted to the Engineering Department (Kim McMillan) as a part of the Public Facility.Improvement (PH) permit plans. Includeed with the plans shall be a proposed landscape plan and maintenance plan. 20. An erosion control plan shall be provided as part of the Site Permit drawings. The plan shall conform to the "Erosion Prevention and Sediment Control Design and Planning Manual, February 2003 edition." NOTICE OF TYPE II DECISION SDR2006-00008/PAUL SCHATZ MAJOR MODIFICATION PAGE 3 OF 24 21. The applicant shall submit a letter of approval from TVFR for the site layout, fire hydrant placement and fire sprinkler requirements prior to issuance of the Site permit. THE FOLLOWING CONDITIONS SHALL BE SATISFIED PRIOR TO FINAL BUILDING INSPECTION: Submit to the Planning Division(Cheryl Caines, 639-4171,ext. 2437) for review and approval: 22. Prior to issuance of any Certificates of Occupancy,the applicant/owner shall record a deed restriction to the effect that any existing tree greater than 12' diameter maybe removed only if the tree dies or is hazardous according to a certified arborist. The deed restriction may be removed or will be considered invalid if a tree preserved in accordance with this decision should either die or be removed as a hazardous tree. Submit to the Engineering Department (Kim McMillan, 639-4171, ext. 2642) for review and approval: 23. Prior to a final building inspection, the applicant shall complete any work in the public right-of-way and submit written approval from ODOT to the Engineering Department. 24. The applicant shall provide signage at the entrance of each shared flag lot driveway or private street that lists the addresses that are served by the given driveway or street. 25. Prior to a final building inspection,the applicant shall pay$1,642.50 to the City for the striping of the bike lane along the frontage of Bonita Road or provide the striping. 26. The applicant shall either place the existing overhead utility lines along SW Bonita underground as a part of this project, or they shall pay the fee in-lieu of undergrounding. The fee may be allowed if approved by the City Engineer. The fee shall be calculated by the frontage of the site that is arallel to the utility lines and will be $35.00 per lineal foot. If the fee option is approved by the City Engineer, the amount will be $14,735.00 and it shall be paid prior to final building inspection. 27. Prior to a final building inspection, the applicant shall demonstrate that they have entered into a maintenance agreement with Stormwater Management or another company that demonstrates they can meet the maintenance requirements of the manufacturer, for the proposed onsite storm water treatment facility. 28. Prior to a final building inspection, the applicant's engineer shall submit a final sight distance certification for the intersection of the driveway and Sequoia Parkway. THIS APPROVAL SHALL BE VALID FOR EIGHTEEN(18) MONTHS FROM THE EFFECTIVE DATE OF THIS DECISION. SECTION III. BACKGROUND INFORMATION Site History: Staff conducted a search of City records for the subject property and found a two lot minor land partition approved in 1999 (MLP1999-00025). No other cases were found specific to this site. Vicinity Information: The subject site is located adjacent to Interstate 5 and south of Bonita Rd. The property is zoned I-P with properties to the south and west also zoned I-P. Properties on the north side of Bonita Road are zoned I-L Industrial). The adjacent properties are developed with other bulk sales retail uses. NOTICE OF TYPE II DEQSION SDR2006-00008/PAUL SQ-IATZ MAJOR MODIFICATION PAGE 4 OF 24 Site Information and Proposal Description: The applicant is requesting Site Development Review for a 4,746 square foot addition to the existing building on an approximately2.9 acre site. The addition will be used for eneral retail use,while the existing floor area will continue to be used for bulk sales and associated storage. Other proposed changes are to the parking area and access aisles. The parking is being increased, landscaping decreased and a one-way access aisle is being added along the south side of the 1Duilding. In addition, the applicant is requesting an adjustment to the access standards to reduce the access width from 50 feet with 4-0 feet of pavement to 37 feet with 30 feet of pavement. SECTION IV. COMMENTS FROM PROPERTY OWNERS WITHIN 500 FEET One comment letter was received from Mr. Mark McGirr Executive Director of Administration and Treasurer of Atiyeh Brothers. Atiyeh Brothers owns the parcel directly west of the Paul Schatz development. Mr. McGirr has concerns about the developments effects on a Reciprocal Access and Exclusive Parking Easement between the two properties. The copy of the agreement was found in the Minor Land Partition file (MI.P1999-00025) related to create the two properties,but this copy had not been signed or recorded. In a phone conversation with Mr. McGirr he identified the problem to be with the current design. A landscape island and parking at the northwest corner of the development are being extended into the easement area and trucks trying to reach the Atiyeh Brother's loading docks may not be able to make the turn into the access aisle. A meeting between the two parties was scheduled for January 30,2007 in hopes of reaching an agreement on the design. After the meeting the landscapin and parking within the easement was re-designed and revised plans were submitted February 16, 2007. These revisions are acceptable to Atiyeh Brothers. A copy of an e-mail from Mr.McGirr accepting the revisions was submitted along with the revised plans. SECTION V. SUMMARY OF APPLICABLE REVIEW CRITERIA The proposal's consistency with these Code Chapters is reviewed in the following sections: A. Variances and Adjustments 18.370 B. Zoning Districts 18.530 Industrial Zoning Districts C. Applicable Development Code Standards 18.705 Access Egress and Circulation 18.725 Environmental Performance Standards 18.745 Landscaping, and Screening 18.755 Mixed Solid Waste and Recyclable Storage 18.765 Off-Street parking and loading requirements 18.780 Signs 18.790 Tree Removal 18.795 Visual Clearance D. Specific SDR Approval Criteria 18.360 E. Street and Utility Improvement Standards 18.810 F. Decision Making Procedures 18.390 Impact Study NOTICE OF TYPE II DECISION SDR2006-00008/PAUL SCI-IATZ MAJOR MODIFICATION PAGE 5 OF 24 SECTION VI. APPLICABLE DEVELOPMENT CODE STANDARDS A. VARIANCES AND ADJUSTMENTS: Section 18.370.020.C.5.a provides that in all zoning districts where access and egress drives cannot be readily designed to conform to Code standards within a particular parcel, access with an adjoining property shall be considered. If access in conjunction with another parcel cannot reasonably be achieved, the Director may grant an adjustment to the access requirements of Chapter 18.705 through a Type II procedure, as governed in Section 18.390.030, using approval criteria contained in Subsection 5.b below. The applicant has requested a variance to 18.705.030J: Minimum access requirements for commercial and industrial use. Table 18.705.3 shows that the minimum access width for a development with 100 or more parking spaces is either two 30-foot accesses with 24 feet of pavement and curbs or one 50-foot access with 40 feet of pavement and curbs. The applicant has requested to allow the one existing access,which is 37 feet wide with 30 feet of pavement,satisfy this requirement. The additional pavement and curbs cannot be added because the access flag abuts right-of-way and another development. No other access points are possible due to surrounding development to the south and west and I-5-to the east. The site has frontage on Bonita Road,but the grade is too steep to construct an access. The Director may approve, approve with condition, or deny a request for an adjustment from the access requirement contained in Chapter 18.705, based on the following criteria: It is not possible to share access. The site already shares access with the property to the west onto Sequoia Parkway. No other shared access points are possible. There are no other alternative access points on the street in question or from another street As stated above, there are no possible access points. The existing access is through an access drive shared with properties to the west connecting with Sequoia Parkway. Interstate 5 lies to the east of the site and other developed properties border along the west and south. The access separation requirements cannot be met. The access separation requirements are not applicable because the access does not actually connect with the street (Sequoia Parkway). The applicant is not requesting an adjustment to the separation standards. The request is the minimum adjustment required to provide adequate access. The existing access width is 37 feet and is bordered by right-of-way and an existing development. The necessary pavement and curbing to meet current standards cannot be installed. Given these factors, the request is the minimum adjustment required to provide adequate access. The approved access or access approved with conditions will result in a safe access; and The existing access is wide enough to provide two-way traffic and this access has been adequate access in the past. The minimum requirement for two-way traffic is 24 feet of pavement and the access has 30 feet. A site distance certification has been conditioned by Kim McMillan, the citys Development Review Engineer. This will be for the shared access intersection with Sequoia Parkway,which is off-site. The visual clearance requirement of Chapter 18.795 will be met. The accessway is extended across neighboring developments within the public right-of-way. The intersection of the property line and the right-of-way is not the actual intersection of the access and public street. Therefore,visual clearance is not applicable. NOTICE OF TYPE II DECISION SDR2006-00008/PAUL SQ-IATZ MAJOR MODIFICATION PAGE 6 OF 24 B. ZONING DISTRICTS Industrial Zoning District: Section 18.530.020 Lists the description of the Industrial Zoning Districts. The site is located in the I-P: Industrial Park zoning district. The proposed addition will be sales oriented retail, which is restricted use in the zone. These limited uses, separately or in combination, may not exceed 20% of the entire square footage within a development complex. No retail uses shall exceed 60,000 square feet of gross leasable area per building or business. Total square footage_ of the building will be 44,491 square feet,including the 4,746 square foot addition for sales oriented retail. Thus both the 20% and 60,000 square- foot restrictions are met. The present use of the site is a bulk retail sales. Development Standards: Section 18.530.040.B States that development standards in industrial zoning districts are contained in Table 18.530.2 below: TABLE 18.530.2 DEVELOPMENT STANDARDS IN INDUSTRIAL ZONES STANDARD I-P Proposed Minimum Lot Size None 127,123 sq ft Minimum Lot Width 50 ft 240 ft[1] Minimum Setbacks - Front yard 35 ft 93 ft - Side facing street on corner&through lots 20 ft N/A - Side yard 0/50 ft 25 ft/70 ft - Rear yard 0/50 ft 28 ft - Distance between front of garage&property line abutting a public or private - - street. Maximum Height 45 ft 39 ft. Maximum Site Coverage 75% 80% Minimum Landscape Requirement 25% 20% [1]This measurement is taken within the existing building pad area. As demonstrated in the table above, the proposal complies with the underlying zone development standards. With the exception of lot size, the proposed measurements above are taken from the plans provided. The minimum setback is zero unless abutting a residential zone. This site is surrounded by Industnal zoning and therefore rear and side yard setbacks are not.applicable. The proposed site coverage is above the 75% maximum,but maximum site coverage may be increased to 80% if the provisions of Section 18.530.050.B are satisfied. 18.530.050.B. states that lot coverage may be increased from 75% to 80% as part of the site development review process, providing the following requirements are satisfied: (1) The minimum landscaping requirement shall be 20% of the site. The proposed landscaping covers 20% of the site. (approximately 25,447 square feet). (2) The applicant shall meet the following performance standards with regard to the landscaping plan approved as part of the site development review process: a. Street trees, as required by Section 18.745.040.C.1 are to be installed with a minimum caliper of three inches rather than the two inches as measured at four feet in height; b. The landscaping between a parking lot and street property line shall have a minimum width of 10 feet; c. All applicable buffering screening and setback requirements contained in Section 18.745.050 shall be satisfied. d. The applicant shall provide documentation of an adequate on-going maintenance program to ensure appropriate irrigation and maintenance of the landscape area. NOTICE OF TYPE II DECISION SDR2006.00008/PAUL SCHATZ MAJOR MODIFICATION PAGE 7 OF 24 The applicant's landscape plan shows 2 inch Karpick Red Maples for street trees along Bonita Road. The applicant requests in the revised narrative that three inch caliper street trees be required as a condition of approval. This same lan also shows a landscape strip between the streets (Bonita Rd. and I-5) and parking area that is over 10 feet in width. All buffering and screening,requirements are met and discussed below under the Landscaping and Screening section. No on-going maintenance program has been proposed. The applicant has stated that a maintenance contract can be provided and requests a condition of approval to meet the standard. FINDING: Based on the analysis above,the underlying zoning district standards have not been fully met, however,if the applicant complies with the conditions listed below,the standards will be fully met. CONDITIONS: Prior to site work the applicant must submit a revised landscape lan for review and approval that shows street trees along SW Bonita Road as 3 inch caliper per 18.530.050.B. Prior to building permit issuance, the applicant shall provide documentation of an adequate on-going maintenance program for the landscape areas. C. APPLICABLE DEVELOPMENT CODE STANDARDS Access,Egress and Circulation(18.705): Walkways: 18.705.030(F) requires that on-site pedestrian walkways comply with the following standards: Walkways shall extend from the ground floor entrances or from the ground floor landing of stairs, ramps, or elevators of all commercial, institutional, and industrial uses, to the streets which provide the required access and egress. Walkways shall provide convenient connections between buildings in multi-building commercial, institutional, and industrial complexes. Unless impractical, walkways shall 13e constructed between new and existing developments and neighboring developments; The site plan shows sidewalks leading from the building entrances and connecting with a sidewalk on the neighboring property to the east. This sidewalk leads to the right-of-way. This standard is met. Wherever required walkways cross vehicle access driveways or parking lots, such crossings shall be designed and located for pedestrian safety. Required walkways shall be physically separated from motor vehicle traffic and parking by either a minimum 6-inch vertical separation (curbed ) or a minimum 3-foot horizontal separation, except that pedestrian crossings of traffic aisles are permitted for distances no greater than 36 feet if appropriate landscaping, pavement markings, or contrasting pavement materials are used. Walkways shall be a minimum of four feet in width exclusive of vehicle overhangs and obstructions such as mailboxes, benches, bicycle racks, and sign posts, and shall be in compliance with ADA standards; All sidewalks on site are six feet wide and have curbs for separation from the parking areas. To connect the sidewalk on the Paul Schatz site with those to the west, the walkway must cross an access drive. This crossing is marked with striping (shown on site plan). Required walkways shall be paved with hard surfaced materials such as concrete, asphalt, stone, brick, etc. Walkways may be required to be lighted and/or signed as needed for safety purposes. Soft-surfaced public use pathways may be provided only if such pathways are provided in addition to required pathways. All existing and proposed sidewalks are concrete. Existing and new lights are shown on the site plan spaced throughout the parking areas. This standard is met. Access Management: Section 18.705.030.H.1 states that an access report shall be submitted with all new development proposals which verifies design of driveways and streets are safe by meeting adequate stacking needs, sight distance and deceleration standards as set by ODOT, Washington County, the City and AASHTO. NOTICE OF TYPE II DECISION SDR2006-00008/PAUL SQ IATZ MAJOR MODIFICATION PAGE 8 OF 24 The applicant did not address this section of the code. The applicant shares the driveway with several properties. While the driveway is located within the public right-of-way(ROW) the driveway does intersect equoia Parkway. To ensure cars can safely exit the shared dnveway, the applicant's engineer shall submit a preliminary sight distance certification for the intersection of the dnveway with Sequoia Parkway with a list of improvements, if required, to achieve the required minimum sight distance. If there are improvements required, i.e. trimming of trees and shrubs, the applicant shall coordinate that work with the property owner(s). The engineer shall submit a final sight distance certification prior to a final building inspection. Section 18.705.030.H.2 states that driveways shall not be permitted to be placed in the influence area of collector or arterial street intersections. Influence area of intersections is that area where queues of traffic commonly orm on approach to an intersection. The minimum driveway setback from a collector or arterial street intersection shall be 150 feet, measured from the right-of-way line of the intersecting street to the throat of the proposed driveway. The setback may be greater depending upon the influence area, as determined from City Engineer review of a traffic impact report submitted by the applicant's traffic engineer. In a case where a project has less than 150 feet of street frontage, the applicant must explore any option for shared access with the adjacent parcel. If shared access is not possible or practical,the driveway shall be placed as far from the intersection as possible. The applicant did not address this code section. This driveway is unusual in its placement in that it cannot be measured as described above because it is wholly within the ROW. There are no opportunities to move it further away from the intersection of Bonita Road,a Collector,and Sequoia Parkway. FINDING: The access requirements have been met. Environmental performance standards (18.725): These standards require that federal and state environmental laws, rules and regulations be applied to development within the City of Tigard. Section 18.725.030 (Performance Standards) regulates: Noise,visible emissions,vibration and odors. Noise. For the purposes of noise regulation, the provisions of Sections 7.41.130 through 7.40.210 of the Tigard Municipal Code shall apply. Visible Emissions. Within the commercial zoning districts and the industrial park (IP) zoning district, there shall be no use, operation or activity which results in a stack or other point- source emission, other than an emission from space heating, or the emission of pure uncombined water (steam) which is visible from a property line. Department of Environmental Quality(DEQ) rules for visible emissions (340-21-015 and 3 0-28-070) apply. Vibration. No vibration other than that caused by highway vehicles, trains and aircraft is permitted in any given zoning district which is discernible without instruments at the property line of the use concerned. Odors. The emissions of odorous gases or other matter in such quantities as to be readily detectable at any point beyond the property line of the use creating the odors is prohibited. DEQ rules for odors (340-028-090) apply. Glare and heat. No direct or sky reflected glare, whether from floodlights or from high temperature processes such as combustion or welding, which is visible at the lot line shall be permitted, and; 1) there shall be no emission or transmission of heat or heated air which is discernible at the lot line of the source; and 2) these regulations shall not apply to signs or floodlights in parking areas or construction equipment at the time of construction or excavation work otherwise permitted by this title. Insects and rodents. All materials including wastes shall be stored and all grounds shall be maintained in a manner which will not attract or aid the propagation of insects or rodents or create a health hazard. NOTICE OF TYPE II DECISION SDR2006-00008/PAUL SC HATZ MAJOR MODIFICATION PAGE 9 OF 24 The proposal is to add a small amount of sales oriented retail to an existing bulk sales use. Both of these uses are permitted within the I-P zone. The applicant has not indicated that the above standards will be met;_however, based on the provision of adequate trash and recycling area, and the fact that the proposed use is not likely to generate noise, visible emissions, odors, glare and heat, or harbor insects and rodents, this standard is satisfied. As stated above this is an addition to an existing development, which has had no problems meeting these standards in the past. Ongoing maintenance to meet these standards shall be maintained and any violation of these standards will be addressed by the City of Tigard's' Code Enforcement Officer. FINDING: The Environmental Performance Standards are met. Landscaping and Screening(18.745): Street Trees: Section 18.745.040 states that all development projects fronting on a public street or a private drive more than 100 feet in length shall be required to plant street trees in accordance with Section 18.745.040.0 Section 18.745.040.0 requires that street trees be spaced between 20 and 40 feet apart depending on the size classification of the tree at maturity(small,medium or large). The applicant has shown Red Maples to be planted as street trees along Bonita Road. The plan shows 2 inch trees,but the applicant has noted in the narrative that 3 inch trees will be planted to meet the increased site coverage standards addressed above under Industrial Zoning Districts. Buffering and Screening: Section 18.745.080 states that no buffer is required between abutting uses that are of a different type when the uses are separated by a street. No buffer is required between a proposed office use and existing office use. Buffering and/or screening are required for dissimilar uses. To the north and east are Interstate 5 and Bonita Road. To the west and south are existing retail businesses. Similar uses do not require buffering or screening. This standard has been met. Screening: Special Provisions: Section 18.745.050.E requires the screening of parking and loading areas. Landscaped parking areas shall include special design features which effectively screen the parking lot areas from view. Planting materials to be installed should achieve a relative balance between low lying and vertical shrubbery and trees. Trees shall be planted in landscaped islands in all parking areas, and shall be equally distributed on the basis of one (1) tree for each seven(7) parking_spaces in order to provide a canopy effect. The minimum dimension on the landscape islands shall be three (3) feet wide and the landscaping shall be protected from vehicular damage by some form of wheel guard or curb. The site lies below grades of the two adjacent right-of-ways and therefore screening with plant material is not as effective. Regardless the applicant has proposed adding a mix of trees and shrubs to existing landscaping. For the new parking area in the SE corner of the site, trees and tall shrubs are proposed. This area abuts the back side of the Home Depot building and is not generally seen off-site by the general public. This standard has been met. Screenin Of Service Facilities. Except for one-family and two-family dwellings, any refuse container or disposal area and service facilities such as gas meters and air conditioners which would otherwise be visible from a public street, customer or resident parking area, any public facility or any residential area shall be screened from view by placement of a solid wood fence or masonry wall between five and eight feet in height. All refuse materials shall be contained within the screened area; There is inadequate information provided in the lans to establish whether this standard is met. Therefore, the applicant will be required to submit detailed plans for Planning Division review prior to issuance of a building permit that shows any new service facilities including air conditioners and gas meters screened from view. NOTICE OF TYPE II DECISION SDR2006-00008/PAUL SCHATZ MAJOR MODIFICATION PAGE 10 OF 24 • Screening Of Refuse Containers. Except for one- and two-family dwellings, any refuse container or refuse collection area which would be visible from a public street, parking lot, residential or commercial area, or any public facility such as a school or park shall be screened or enclosed from view by placement of a solid wood fence, masonry wall or evergreen hedge. All refuse shall be contained within the screened area. Paul Schatz furniture generates a small amount of waste. The applicant stated in an e-mail that the business utilizes two small dumpsters that are located near a landscape island and the loading docks. A revised site plan must be provided to show the exact location. It cannot be determined at this time if screening is necessary. The decision has been conditioned to ensure this standard is met. FINDING: Based on the analysis above,the landscaping and screening standards have not been fully met. If the applicant complies with the conditions listed below,the standards will be met. CONDITIONS: Submit detailed plans for review and approval that shows all new service facilities including air conditioning units, HVAC, and gas meters, are screened from public view. Submit detailed plans for review and approval that shows the location of the two small dumpsters used for trash collection. If screening is required,it must be shown on the plans. Off-Street Parking and Loading(18.765): Location of vehicle parking: Off-street parking spaces for single-family and duplex dwellings and single-family attached dwellings s all be located on the same lot with the dwellings. Off-street parking lots for uses not listed above shall be located not further than 200 feet from the building or use that they are required to serve, measured in a straight line from the building with the following exceptions: a) commercial and industrial uses which require more than 40 parking spaces may provide for the spaces in excess of the required first 40 spaces up to a distance of 300}eet from the primary site; The 40 parking spaces which remain on the primary site must be available for users in the following order of priority: 1) Disabled-accessible spaces; 2) Short-term spaces; 3) Long-term preferential carpool and vanpool spaces; 4) Long-term spaces. The parking lots associated with this project are directly adjacent to the proposed building, in compliance with this standard. Joint Parking: Owners of two or more uses, structures or parcels of land may agree to utilize jointly the same fparking and loading spaces when the peak hours of operation do not overlay, subject to the ollowing: 1) The size of the oint parking facility shall be at least as large as the number of vehicle parking spaces required by the larger(est) use per Section 18.765.070; 2) Satisfactory legal evidence shall be presented to the Director in the form of deeds, leases or contracts to establish the joint use; 3) If a joint use arrangement is subsequently terminated, or if the uses change, the requirements of this title thereafter apply to each separately. Joint parkingis not proposed with this application, but the site configuration in relation to the property to the west makes the parking on each site appear as a shared parking area. The applicant is able to meet the minimum off-street parking requirements without the off-site parg. A joint parking agreement is not necessary. There is a Reciprocal Access and Exclusive Parking Easement Agreement between the two fproperties, but a copy was not provided with this application. A copy was found in the Minor Land Partition ile (MLP1999-00025) to divide the property into two parcels. NOTICE OF TYPE II DECISION SDR2006-00008/PAUL SCEIATZ MAJOR MODIFICATION PAGE 11 OF 24 • Parking in Mixed-Use Projects: In mixed-use projects, the required minimum vehicle parking shall be determined using the following formula. 1) Primary use, i.e., that with the largest proportion of total floor area within the development, at 100% of the minimum vehicle arking required for that use in Section 18.765.060; 2) Secondary use, i.e., that with the second largest percentage of total floor area within the development, at 90% of the vehicle parkin required for that use in Section 18.765.060; 3) Subsequent use or uses, at 80% of the vehicle parking required for that use(s) in Section 18.765.060; 4) The maximum parking allowance shall be 150% of the total minimum parking as calculated above. This proposal is not considered a mixed-use project as it will contain solely office space; therefore this standard is not applicable. Visitor Parking in Multi-Family Residential Developments: Multi-dwelling units with more than 10 required parking spaces shall provide an additional 15% of vehicle parking spaces above the minimum required for the use of guests of residents of the complex. These spaces shall be centrally located or distributed throughout the development. Required bicycle parking facilities shall also be centrally located within or evenly distributed throughout the development. This project does not involve a residential use. Therefore,this standard does not apply. Preferential Long-Term Carpool/Vanpool Parking: Parking lots providing in excess of 20 long-term parking spaces shall provide preferential long-term carpool and vanpool parking for employees, students and other regular visitors to the site. At least 5% of total long-term parking spaces shall be reserved for carpool/vanpool use. Preferential parking for carpools/vanpools shall be closer to the main entrances of the building than any other employee or student parking except parking spaces designated for use by the disabled. Preferential carpool/vanpool spaces shall be lull-sized per requirements in Section 18.765.040N and shall be clearly designated for use only by carpools and vanpools between 7:00 AM and 5:30 PM Monday through Friday. The parking_associated with the development has 63 existing parking spaces and an additional 51 are proposed. The applicant has not furnished information related to the relative number of long term versus short term parking. A condition will be imposed to meet this standard. Disabled-Accessible Parking: All parking areas shall be provided with the required number of parking spaces for disabled persons as specified by the State of Oregon Uniform Building Code and federal standards. Such parking spaces shall be sized,signed and marked as required by these regulations. The applicant has indicated that there are 5 ADA handicap spaces provided. Based on the 2004 Oregon Structural Specialty Code the applicant must provide 5 spaces. Final determination of the number of required ADA spaces will be made by the building official during the review of the building permit application. As shown,the site plan appears to be in compliance with the ADA requirements. DEQ indirect source construction permit: All parking lots containing 250 spaces or parking structures containing two or more levels shall require review by the Oregon Department of Environmental Quality (DEQ) to: 1. Acquire an Indirect Source Construction Permit; or 2. Investigate the feasibility of installing oil and grease separators This standard is not applicable. Access Drives: With regard to access to public streets from off-street parking: access drives from the street to off- streetparking or loading areas shall be designed and constructed to facilitate the flow of traffic and provide maximum safety for pedestrian and vehicular traffic on the site; the number and size of access drives shall be in accordance with the requirements of Chapter, 18.705 Access, Egress and Circulation; access drives shall be clearly and permanently marked and defined through use of rails, fences, walls or other barriers or markers on frontage not occupied by service drives; access drives shall have a minimum vision clearance in accordance with Chapter 18.795, Visual Clearance; access NOTICE OF TYPE II DECISION SDR200600008/PAUL SQ-IATZ MAJOR MODIFICATION PAGE 12 OF 24 drives shall be improved with an asphalt or concrete surface; and excluding single-family and duplex residences, except as provided by Subsection 18.810.030.P, groups of two or more parking spaces shall be served by a service drive so that no backing movements or other maneuvering within a street or other public nght-of-way will be required. The proposed access drive is clearly marked, and the parking area provides ample room to facilitate a forward entrance onto the private access drive that connects to the public street. Pedestrian Access: Pedestrian access through parking lots shall be provided in accordance with Section 18.705.030.F. Where a parking area or other vehicle area has a drop-off grade separation, the property owner shall install a wall, railing, or other barrier which will prevent a slow-moving vehicle or driverless vehicle from escaping such area and which will prevent pedestrians from walking over drop-off edges. There are no drop-off grade separated areas within the parking area. Parking Lot Striping: Except for single-family and duplex residences, any area intended to be used to meet the off-street parking requirements as contained in this Chapter shall have all parking spaces clearly marked; and all intenor drives and access aisles shall be clearly marked and signed to show direction of flow and maintain vehicular and pedestrian safety. The plans submitted show the parking spaces are clearly marked with striping. Wheel Stops: Parking spaces along the boundaries of a parking lot or adjacent to interior landscaped areas or sidewalks shall be provided with a wheel stop at least four inches high located three feet back from the front of the parking stall. The front three feet of the parking stall may be concrete, asphalt or low lying landscape material that does not exceed the height of the wheel stop. This area cannot be calculated to meet landscaping or sidewalk requirements. All of the standard parking spaces measure at least 15.5 by 8.5 feet with three feet of bumper overhang; most spaces measure 9 feet in width. No compact spaces are proposed. Curbing is provided on the perimeter of the parking area. This standard has been met. Space and Aisle Dimensions: Section 18.765.040.N states that: "except as modified for angled parking in Figures 18.765.1 and 18.765.2 the minimum dimensions for parking spaces are: 8.5 feet x 18.5 feet for a standard space and 7.5 feet x 16.5 feet for a compact space"; aisles accommodating two direction traffic, or allowing access from both ends, shall be 24 feet in width. No more than 50% of the required spaces may be compact spaces. The applicant's dimensioned plans show that all spaces fully conform to standard sized spaces. All aisles exceed the minimum width of 24 feet; most are 26 feet. A proposed one way drive aisle around the rear of the building is 13 feet at its narrowest point. The code does not give standards for one-way aisle widths, but the parking structure matrix shows a minimum 13 feet. Because this aisle is so narrow, it should be clearly marked as a one-way drive aisle. The decision has been conditioned to ensure the aisle is properly marked. Bicycle Parking Location and Access: Section 18.76550 states bicycle parking areas shall be provided at locations within 50 feet of primary entrances to structures; bicycle parking areas shall not be located within parking aisles, landscape areas or pedestrian ways; outdoor bicycle parking shall be visible from on-site buildings and/or the street. When the bicycle parking area is not visible from the street, directional signs shall be used to located the parking area; and bicycle parking may be located inside a building on a floor which has an outdoor entrance open for use and floor location which does not require the bicyclist to use stairs to gain access to the space. Exceptions may be made to the latter requirement for parking on upper stories within a multi-story residential building. NOTICE OF TYPE II DEQSION SDR2006-00008/PAUL SCHATZ MAJOR MODIFICATION PAGE 13 OF 24 • The site plan shows bicycle parking within 20 feet to each building entrance. All locations may not be visible from the street due to the sites location in relation to the street, but the parking is provided in such close proximity to the building entrances that signage is not necessary. Bicycle Parking Design Requirements: Section 18.765.-050.C. The following design requirements apply to the installation of bicycle racks: The racks required for required bicycle parking spaces shall ensure that bicycles may be securely locked to them without undue inconvenience. Provision of bicycle lockers for long-term (employee) parking is encouraged but not required; bicycle racks must be securely anchored to the ground, wall or other structure; bicycle parking spaces shall be at least 21/2 feet by six feet long, and when covered,with a vertical clearance of seven feet. An access aisle of at least five feet wide shall be provided and maintained beside or between each row of bicycle parking; each required bicycle parking space must be accessible without moving another bicycle; required bicycle parking spaces may not be rented or leased except where required motor vehicle parking is rented or leased. At-cost or deposit fees for bicycle parking are exempt from this requirement; and areas set aside for required bicycle arking must be clearly reservedpfor bicycle parking only. Outdoor bicycle parking facilities shall-be surfaced with a hard surfaced material, i.e., pavers, asphalt, concrete or similar material. This surface must be designed to remain well drained. The applicant has not provided a detail of the bike rack to be used;therefore, staff is unable to confirm that this standard is met. The applicant will need to provide a detail of the proposed bike rack with the building permit submittal. Minimum Bicycle Parking Requirements: The total number of required bicycle parking spaces for each use is specified in Table 18.765.2 in Section 18.765.070.H. In no case shall there be less than two bicycle parking spaces. According to Table 18.765.2 of the Tigard Development Code, the minimum bicycle-parking requirement for both sales-oriented retail and bulk sales is 0.3 spaces per 1,000 gross square feet. Based on the total square footage of the building, the required number of bicycle spaces is fourteen (14). Fourteen spaces are provided. This criterion is met. Minimum Off-Street Parking: Section 18.765.070.H states that the minimum and maximum parking shall be as required in Table 18.765.2. The minimum parking for the existing use of bulk sales is 1.0 space per 1,000 gross square feet; for the ppropposed use of sales-oriented retail 3.7 spaces per 1,000 is required. The proposed addition and existing buifdirig totals 44,491 square feet, therefore 58 spaces are required. The site-lies within the Zone B parking area for purposes of calculating maximum number of parking spaces. The maximum allowed parking is 2.0 and 6.2 spaces per 1,000 g.s.f. or 110 spaces. The applicant has an existing 63 spaces and has proposed an additional 51 spaces bringing the total to 114 spaces. Five of these are handicap accessible spaces and are not included in the maximum number allowed. Therefore both minimum and maximum standards are met. Off-Street Loading Spaces: Commercial, industrial and institutional buildings or structures to be built or altered which receive and distribute material or merchandise by truck shall provide and maintain off-street loading and maneuvering space as follows: A minimum of one loading space is required for buildings with 10,000 gross square feet or more; A minimum of two loading spaces for buildings with 40,000 gross square-feet or more. The applicant has proposed a 4,746 square-foot addition. Total square footage of the building will be 44,491. The existing building already includes three loading spaces, which exceeds the two spaces required. This standard has been met. FINDING: Based on the analysis above, the off-street parking and loading standards have not been fully satisfied; however, if the applicant complies with the conditions listed below, the standards will be met. NOTICE OF TYPE II DEQSION SDR2006-00008/PAUL SCHATZ MAJOR MODIFICATION PAGE 14 OF 24 CONDITIONS: • Prior to issuance of building/site permits the applicant shall submit plans for review and approval that show the direction od flow and signage details for the one-way access drive. • Prior to issuance of building/site permits, the applicant shall submit information stating the number of long-term parking spaces Being provided. If this number exceeds 20, then a revised site plan must e submitted-for review and approval that shows how the carpool/vanpoo-1 parking standards are met. • Provide a detail of the bike racks to be used. Signs (18.780): Chapter 18.780.130.0 lists the type of allowable signs and sign area permitted in the C-G Zoning District. There is an existing sign on-site. The application does not request any changes to the existing signage. This section does not apply. Tree Removal(18.790): 18.790.030,Tree Plan Requirement A. Tree plan required. A tree plan for the planting, removal and protection of trees prepared by a certified arborist shall be provided for any lot, parcel or combination of lots or parcels for which a development application for a subdivision, partition, site development review, planned development or conditional use is filed. Protection is preferred over removal wherever possible. As required, the applicant submitted a tree plan (dated December 7, 2006) conducted by John O'Shea, certified arborist. B. Plan requirements. The tree plan shall include the following: 1. Identification of the location, size and species of all existing trees including trees designated as significant by the city; The Arborist Report identified the location, size and species of all existing trees, consistent with this standard. 2. Identification of a program to save existing trees or mitigate tree removal over 12 inches in caliper. Mitigation must follow the replacement guidelines of Section 18.790.060D, in accordance with the following standards and shall be exclusive of trees required by other development code provisions for landscaping, streets and parking lots: a. Retention of less than 25% of existing trees over 12 inches in caliper requires a mitigation program in accordance with Section 18.790.060D of no net loss of trees; b. Retention of from 25% to 50% of existing trees over 12 inches in caliper requires that two-thirds of the trees to be removed-be mitigated in accordance with Section 18.790.060D; c. Retention of from 50% to 75% of existing trees over 12 inches in caliper requires that 50 percent of the trees to be removed be mitigated in accordance with Section 18.790.060D; d. Retention of 75% or greater of existing trees over 12 inches in caliper requires no mitigation. The applicant's tree removal plan and arborist report indicate the trees on the property that are to remain and those proposed for removal. The plan shows tree #23 as being saved but the applicant states in an addendum to the narrative that this tree will be removed. There are a total'of 6 trees on site 12 inches and greater. One is hazardous and thus only 5 are subject to mitigation. Of these, 3 will be retained. This equates to 60% retention. According to the mitigation schedule above 50% of the inches to be removed shall be mitigated. The applicant has proposed paying the fee-in-lieu of mitigation because there is limited space on-site to plant trees. NOTICE OF TYPE II DECISION SDR2006-00008/PAUL SCHATZ MAJOR MODIFICATION PAGE 15 OF 24 • 3. Identification of all trees which are proposed to be removed; The applicant has provided a tree removal plan and a copy of the arborist's tree survey. 4. A protection program defining standards and methods that will be used by the applicant to protect trees during and after construction. The guidelines for tree protection are outlined in the arborist report. 18.790.040 Incentives for Tree Retention B. Subsequent removal of a tree. Any tree preserved or retained in accordance with this section may thereafter be removed only for the reasons set out in a tree plan in accordance with Section 18.790.030, or as a condition of approval for a conditional use, and shall not be subject to removal under any other section of this chapter. The property owner shall record a deed restriction as a condition of approval of any development permit affected by this section to the effect that such tree may be removed only if the tree dies or is hazardous according to a certified arborist. The deed restriction may be removed or will be considered invalid if a tree preserved in accordance with this section should either die or be removed as a hazardous tree. The form of this deed restriction shall be subject to approval by the Director. Conditions of approval will ensure that this standard is met. CONDITIONS: • Prior to commencing site work,the applicant shall pay a tree mitigation fee in-lieu of replanting for the value of 26.25 caliper inches (26. 5 x$125=$3,281.25). • Tree Protection - Prior to any.site work the applicant shall install all proposed tree protection fencing. The fencing shall be inspected and approved by the Project Arborist and City Planner Cheryl Caines prior to commencing any site work The tree protection fencing shall remain in place through the duration of all of the building construction phases,until the Certificate of Occupancy has been approved. • Prior to issuance of building ermits, the applicant shall submit site plan drawings indicating the location of die trees that were preserved on the lot during site development, location of tree protection fencing, and a signature of approval from the project arborist regarding the placement and construction techniques to be employed in building the structures. All proposed protection fencing shall be installed and inspected prior to commencing construction. The fencing shall remain in place through the duration of all of the building construction phases until the Certificate of Occupancy has been approved. After approval from City Staff,the tree protection measures may be removed-. • Prior to any Certificates of Occupancy, the applicant shall ensure that the Project Arborist has submitted written reports to the Planning Department (Cheryl Caines), at least, once every two weeks from initial tree protection zone (TPZ) fencing installation, through the building construction phases, as he monitors the construction activities and progress. This inspection will be to evaluate the tree protection fencing, determine if the fencing was moved at any point during construction,and determine if any part of the Tree Protection Plan has been violated. These reports must be provided to the City until the time of the issuance of any Certificates of Occupancy. The reports shall include any changes that occurred to the TPZ as well as the condition and location of the tree protection fencing. If the amount of TPZ was reduced then the Project Arborist shall justify why the fencing was moved, and shall certify that the construction activities to the trees did not adversely impact the overall,long-term health and stability of the tree(s). NOTICE OF TYPE II DECISION SDR2006-00008/PAUL SQ 1ATZ MAJOR MODIFICATION PAGE 16 OF 24 • If the reports are not submitted or received by the City Planner at the scheduled intervals and if it appears the TPZ's or the Tree Protection Plan are not being followed by the contractor or a sub-contractor,the City can stop work on the project until an inspection can be done by the City Staff and the Project Arborist. Prior to issuance of- Certificates of Occupancy, the Project Arbonst will submit a final certification indicating the elements of the Tree Protection Plan were followed and that all remaining trees on the site are healthy, stable and viable in their modified growing environment. • Deed Restriction Prior to issuance of any Certificates of Occupancy,the applicant/owner shall record a deed restriction to the effect that any existing tree greater than 12" diameter maybe removed only if the tree dies or is hazardous according to a certified arborist. The deed restriction may be removed or will be considered invalid if a tree preserved in accordance with this decision should either die or be removed as a hazardous tree. Visual Clearance Areas (18.795): Chapter 18.795 requires that a clear vision area shall be maintained on the corners of all property adjacent to intersecting right-of-ways or the intersection of a public street and a private driveway. A clear vision area shaWcontain no vehicle, hedge, planting, fence, wall structure, or temporary or permanent obstruction exceeding three (31 feet in height. The code provides that obstructions that may be located in this area shalt be visually clear between three (3) and eight (8) feet in height (8) (trees may be placed within this area provided that all branches below eight 8) feet are removed). A visual clearance area is the triangular area formed by measuring a 30-foot distance along the street right-of-way and the driveway, and then connecting these two( 2), 30-foot distance points with a straight line. Due to the odd shape of the right-of-way,the site's access does not intersect with the public street. The visual clearance standards do not apply in this situation. A site distance certification is being conditioned for the intersection which is off-site. FINDING: Based on the analysis above,the vision clearance standards do not apply. D. SPECIFIC SITE DEVELOPMENT REVIEW APPROVAL STANDARDS Section 18.360.090(A)(2) through 18.360.090(A)(15) provides additional Site Development Review approval standards not necessarily covered by the provisions of the previously listed sections. These additional standards are addressed immediately below with the following exceptions: The proposal contains no elements related to the provisions of the following and are, therefore, found to be inapplicable as approval standards: 18.360.090.3 (Multi Family Exterior Elevations); 18.360.090.5 (Privacy and Noise: Multi-family or Group Living Uses); 18.360.090.6 (Private Outdoor Areas: Multi-family Use); 18.360.090.7 (Shared Outdoor Recreation Areas: Multi-family Use); 18.360.090.8 (100-year floodplain); and 18.360.090.9 (Demarcation of Spaces). The following sections were discussed elsewhere in this decision and, therefore, will not be addressed in this section: 18.360.090.4 (Buffering, Screening and Compatibility Between Ad4( o Uses; 18.360.090.13 (Parking); 18.360.090.14 (Landscaping); 18.360.090.15 (Drainage);and 18.360.090.14 (Provision for the Disabled). Relationship to the Natural and Physical Environment: Buildings shall be: located to preserve existing trees, topography and natural drainage where possible based upon existing site conditions; located in areas not subject to ground slumping or sliding; located to provide adequate distance between adjoining buildings for adequate light, air circulation, and fire-fighting; and oriented with consideration for sun and wind. Trees shall be preserved to the extent possible. Replacement of trees is subject to the requirements of Chapter 18.790, Tree Removal. NOTICE OF TYPE II DECISION SDR2006-00008/PAUL SCHATZ MAJOR MODIFICATION PAGE 17 OF 24 The proposal is to add 4,746 square feet to an existing 39 745 square-foot building. The addition is proposed in a grassy area along the western side of the building. There are only two 8-inch cedar trees within this area that must be removed. Other trees along the southern boundary are also being removed to construct the accessway around that side of the building. Trees greater than 12-inch DBH are subject to mitigation as required by the landscaping standards of Chapter 18.745 and 18.630. Crime Prevention and Safety: A. Windows shall be located so that areas vulnerable to crime can be surveyed by the occupants; B. Intenor laundry and service areas shall be located in a way that they can be observed by others; C. Mail boxes shall be located in lighted areas having vehicular or pedestrian traffic; D. The exterior lighting levels shall be selected and-the angles shall be oriented towards areas vulnerable to crime; and E. Light fixtures shall be provided in areas having heavy pedestrian or vehicular traffic and in potentially dangerous areas such as parking lots, stairs, ramps and abrupt grade changes. Fixtures shall be placed at a height so that-light patterns overlap at a height of seven feet, which is sufficient to illuminate a person. The applicant has provided elevation plans but no floor plans. Due to the type of use (furniture sales),there are areas used primarily for storage. These areas have no windows for security.reasons. These areas are along the south and southwesterly portions of the building, which are the less visible areas of the development. Windows are provided in the storefront areas. There are no interior service areas or mailboxes for the development. The applicant has shown on the site plan how the modified areas of the site will be illuminated. A mixture of freestanding light poles and wall- mounted fixtures are proposed. FINDING: The standards for Site Development Review have been met. Public Transit: Provisions within the plan shall be included for providing for transit if the development proposal is adjacent to an existing or proposed transit route; the requirements for transit facilities shall be based on: the location of other transit facilities in the area; and the size and type of the proposal. The following facilities may be required after City and Tri-Met review: bus stop shelters; turnouts for buses;and connecting paths to the shelters. The subject site is not adjacent to an existing or proposed transit route. The closest route is along SW 72nd Avenue. This standard does not apply. E. STREET AND UTILITY IMPROVEMENTS STANDARDS Chapter 18.810 provides construction standards for the implementation of public and private facilities and utilities such as streets,sewers, and drainage. The applicable standards are addressed below: Streets: Improvements: Section 18.810.030.A.1 states that streets within a development and streets adjacent shall be improved in accordance with the TDC standards. Section 18.810.030.A.2 states that any new street or additional street width planned as a portion of an existing street shall be dedicated and improved in accordance with the TDC. This site lies adjacent to SW Bonita Road, which is classified as a Collector on the City of Tigard Transportation Plan Map. At present,there is approximately 190 feet of ROW,according to the most recent tax assessor's map. This portion of Bonita Road is within ODOT ROW. NOTICE OF TYPE II DECISION SDR2006-00008/PAUL SCI-IATZ MAJOR MODIFICATION PAGE 18 OF 24 • SW Bonita Road is currently partially. In order to mitigate the impact from this development,the applicant should construct a 6 foot,curb-tight,concrete sidewalk along the Bonita Road frontage. The street trees will be planted behind the sidewalk, thus eliminating,the planter strip between the curb and sidewalk. The elimination of the planter stnp and the narrower sidewalk, 6 foot rather than 8 foot is being allowed due to the steep slope from Bonita Road down to the site. All work within the ROW will'require a Miscellaneous Permit from ODOT. Future Street Plan and Extension of Streets: Section 18.810.030.F states that a future street plan shall be filed which shows the pattern of existing and proposed future streets from the boundanes of the proposed land division. This section also states that where it is necessary to give access or permit a satisfactory future division of adjoining land, streets shall be extended to the boundary lines of the tract to be developed and a barricade shall be constructed at the end of the street. These street stubs to adjoining properties are not considered to be cul-de-sacs since they are intended to continue as through streets at such time as the adjoining property is developed. A barricade shall be constructed at the end of the street by the property owners which shall not be removed until authorized by the City Engineer, the cost of which shall be included in the street construction cost. Temporary hammerhead turnouts or temporary cul-de-sac bulbs shall be constructed for stub streets in excess of 150 feet in length. The applicant did not address this section. Due to the location of Bonita Road,Interstate 5 and pre-existing development there are no opportunities for future streets or extensions of streets. Street Alignment and Connections: Section 18.810.030.H.1 states that full street connections with spacing of no more than 530 feet between connections is required except where prevented by barriers such as topography, railroads, freeways, preexistingg develo ments lease provisions, easements, covenants or other restrictions existing prior to May 1, 1995 which preclude street connections. A full street connection may also be exempted due to a regulated water feature if regulations would not permit construction. Section 18.810.030.H.2 states that all local, neighborhood routes and collector streets which abut a development site shall be extended within the site to provide through circulation when not precluded by environmental or topographical constraints, existing development patterns or strict adherence to other standards in this code. A street connection or extension is precluded when it is not possible to redesign, or reconfigure the street pattern to provide required extensions. Land is considered topographically constrained if the slope is greater than 15% for a distance of 250 feet or more. In the case of environmental or topographical constraints, the mere presence of a constraint is not sufficient to show that a street connection is not possible. The applicant must show why the constraint precludes some reasonable street connection. The applicant did not address this section. Due to the location of Bonita Road,Interstate 5,steep slopes and pre-existing development there are no opportunities to provide street connections. Block Designs - Section 18.810.040.A states that the length, width and shape of blocks shall be designed with due regard to providing adequate building sites for the use contemplated consideration of needs --for convenient access, circulation, control and safety of street traffic and recognition of limitations and opportunities of topography. Block Sizes: Section 18.810.040.B.1 states that the perimeter of blocks formed by streets shall not exceed 1,800 feet measured along the right-of-way line except: • Where street location is precluded by natural topography, wetlands or other bodies of water or,pre-existing development or • For blocks adjacent to arterial streets,limited access highways,major collectors or railroads. • For non-residential blocks in which internal public circulation provides equivalent access. The site is adjacent to an interstate highway(1-5) and below the grade of Bonita Road access to the site is limited. Further constraints are placed on the site because it is located in an area that is fully developed. Commercial developments abut the property to the south and west. There are no opportunities to provide a new connection to existing right-of-way. NOTICE OF TYPE II DECISION SDR2006-00008/PAUL SCHATZ MAJOR MODIFICATION PAGE 19 OF 24 Section 18.810.040.B.2 also states that bicycle and pedestrian connections on public easements or right-of-ways shall be provided when full street connection is not possible. Spacing between connections shall be no more than 330 feet, except where precluded by environmental or topographical constraints, existing development patterns, or strict adherence to other standards in the code. For the same reasons stated above, there is little opportunity to provide a bicycle/pedestrian connection on this site. The orientation of the buildings of surrounding developments also does not naturally lead to a highly functioning pedestrian connection. The parking and building entrances face away from one another. Customers to retail business do not generally venture to the rear or loading areas of the building. Lots - Size and Shape: Section 18.810.060(A) prohibits lot depth from being more than 2.5 times the average lot width, unless the parcel is less than 1.5 times the minimum lot size of the applicable zoning district. Lot Frontage: Section 18.810.060(B) requires that lots have at least 25 feet of frontage on public or private streets, other than an alley. In the case of a land partition, 18.420.050.A.4.c applies, which requires a parcel to either have a minimum 15-foot frontage or a minimum 15-foot wide recorded access easement. In cases where the lot is for an attached single-family dwelling unit, the frontage shall be at least 15 feet. No new parcels are being created with this project. These standards do not apply. Sidewalks: Section 18.810.070.A requires that sidewalks be constructed to meet City design standards and be located on both sides of arterial, collector and local residential streets. Private streets and industrial streets shall have sidewalks on at least one side. The applicant's plans indicate they will construct a 6-foot curb-tight sidewalk along their Bonita Road frontage. The street trees will be planted behind the sidewali,thus eliminating the planter strip between the curb and sidewalk. The elimination of the planter strip and the narrower sidewalk, 6 foot rather than 8 foot, is being allowed due to the steep slope from Bonita Road down to the site. The distance from the west end of the frontage to the concrete curb return at the intersection of Bonita Road and Sequoia Parkway is approximately 170 feet. 18.810.070.B.2 provides for extending the sidewalk to meet the existing sidewalk. In this case, the asphalt sidewalk does not meet the standards and shall be replaced by the applicant,subject to rough proportionality,with a 6-foot,curb-tight,concrete sidewalk to the concrete curb return. Sanitary Sewers: Sewers Required: Section 18.810.090.A requires that sanitary sewer be installed to serve each new development and to connect developments to existing mains in accordance with the provisions set forth in Design and Construction Standards for Sanitary and Surface Water Management(as adopted by the Unified Sewerage Agency in 1996 and including any future revisions or amendments) and the adopted policies of the comprehensive plan. Over-sizing: Section 18.810.090.0 states that proposed sewer systems shall include consideration of additional development within the area as projected by the Comprehensive Plan. The applicant did not address this section of the code. There is a public sewer main on the site. The applicant has proposed a new connection from the addition to the public main. Storm Drainage: General Provisions: Section 18.810.100.A states requires developers to make adequate provisions for storm water and flood water runoff. Accommodation of Upstream Drainage: Section 18.810.100.0 states that a culvert or other drainage facility shall be large enough to accommodate potential runoff from its entire upstream drainage area, whether inside or outside the development. The City Engineer shall approve the necessary size of the facility, based on the provisions of Design and Construction Standards for Sanitary and Surface Water Management(as adopted by the Unified Sewerage Agency in 2000 and including any future revisions or amendments). NOTICE OF TYPE II DECISION SDR200600008/PAUL SQiATZ MAJOR MODIFICATION PAGE 20 OF 24 • The applicant did not address this section of the code. Runoff from the sloped area adjacent to Bonita Road will be collected on site. There are no major drainage ways that impact this development. Effect on Downstream Drainage: Section 18.810.100.D states that where it is anticipated by the City Engineer that the additional runoff resulting from the development will overload an existing drainage facility, the Director and Engineer shall withhold approval of the development until provisions have been made for improvement of the potential condition or until provisions have been made for storage of additional runoff caused by the development in accordance with the Design and Construction Standards for Sanitary and Surface Water Management (as adopted by the Unified Sewerage agency in 2000 and including any future revisions or amendments). In 1997, Clean Water Services (CWS) completed a basin study of Fanno Creek and adopted the Fanno Creek Watershed Management Plan. Section V of that plan includes a recommendation that local governments institute a stormwater detention/effective impervious area reduction program resulting in no net increase in storm peak flows up to the 25-year event. The City will require that all new developments resultin in an increase of impervious surfaces provide onsite detention facilities,unless the development is located adjacent to Fanno Creek. For those developments adjacent to Fanno Creek,the storm water runoff will be permitted to discharge without detention. The applicant's plans indicate they will provide on-site detention by installing an underground pipe on the west side of the development. Bikeways and Pedestrian Pathways: Bikeway Extension: Section 18.810.110.A states that developments adjoining proposed bikeways identified on the City's adopted pedestrian/bikeway plan shall include provisions for the future extension of such bikeways through the dedication of easements or right-of-way. Bonita Road is identified as a Bicycle Facility on Tigard's TSP. Cost of Construction: Section 18.810.110.B states that development permits issued for planned unit developments, conditional use permits subdivisions, and other developments which will principally benefit from such bikeways shall be conditioned to include the cost or construction of bikeway improvements. The applicant shall provide bicycle striping or pay the fee-in-lieu along their frontage. The amount of the striping would be as follows: 421 feet of 8-inch white stripe, at$2.50/if $1,052.50 10 Mono-directional reflective markers @ $4.00/ea $ 40.00 2 Bike lane legends @ $175/ea $ 350.00 2 Directional mini-arrows @ $100/ea $ 200.00 $1,642.50 Minimum Width: Section 18.810.110.0 states that the minimum width for bikeways within the roadway is five feet per bicycle travel lane. Minimum width for two-way bikeways separated from the road is eight feet. The minimum width for a bicycle lane along a collector is 6 feet. Utilities: Section 18.810.120 states that all utility lines, but not limited to those required for electric communication, lighting and cable television services and related facilities shall be placed underground, except for surface mounted transformers, surface mounted connection boxes and meter cabinets which may be placed above ground, temporary utility service facilities during construction, high capacity electric lines operating at 50,000 volts or above,and: • The developer shall make all necessary arrangements with the serving utility to provide the underground services; • The City reserves the right to approve location of all surface mounted facilities; • All underground utilities, including sanitary sewers and storm drains installed in streets by the developer,shall be constructed prior to the surfacing of the streets; and NOTICE OF TYPE II DEQSION SDR2006-00008/PAUL SCHATZ MAJOR MODIFICATION PAGE 21 OF 24 • Stubs for service connections shall be long enough to avoid disturbing the street improvements when service connections are made. Exception to Under-Grounding Requirement Section 18.810.120.0 states that a developer shall pay a fee in-lieu of under-grounding costs when the development is proposed to take place on a street where existing utilities which are not underground will serve time development and the approval authority determines that the cost and technical difficulty of under-grounding the utilities outweighs the benefit of under-grounding in conjunction with the development. The determination shall be on a case-by-case basis. The most common, but not the only, such situation is a short frontage development for which under-grounding would result in the placement of additional poles, rather than the removal of above-ground utilities facilities. An applicant for a development which is served by utilities which are not underground and which are located across a public right-of-way from the applicant's property shall pay a tee in-lieu of under-grounding. There are existing overhead utility lines along the frontage of SW Bonita Road. If the fee in-lieu is proposed, it is equal to $35.00 per lineal foot of street frontage that contains the overhead lines. The frontage along this site is 421 lineal feet;therefore the fee would be $14,735.00. ADDITIONAL CITY AND/OR AGENCY CONCERNS WITH STREET AND UTILITY IMPROVEMENT STANDARDS: Fire and Life Safety: Thplicant shall submit a letter of approval from TVFR for the site layout,fire hydrant placement and fire sprinkler requirements prior to issuance of permits. Public Water System: The applicant has not proposed any public water improvements. Storm Water Quality: The City has agreed to enforce Surface Water Management SWM) regulations established by Clean Water Services (CWS) Design and Construction Standards ((adopted by Resolution and Order No. 00-7) which require the construction of on-site water quality facilities. The facilities shall be designed to remove 65 percent of the phosphorus contained in 100 percent of the storm water runoff generated from newly created impervious surfaces. In addition, a maintenance plan shall be submitted indicating the frequency and method to be used in keeping the facility maintained through the year. Prior to construction, the applicant shall submit plans and calculations for a water quality facility that will meet the intent of the CWS Design Standards. In addition,the applicant shall submit a maintenance plan for the facility that must be reviewed and approved by the City prior to constriction. The proposed unit from Stormwater Management is acceptable provided the property owner agrees to hire the manufacturer (or approved equal)_ to provide the required maintenance of the unit. Prior to a final building inspection, the applicant shall demonstrate that they have entered into a maintenance agreement with Stormwater Management, or another company that demonstrates they can meet the maintenance requirements of the manufacturer. Grading and Erosion Control: CWS Design and Construction Standards also regulate erosion control to reduce the amount of sediment and other pollutants reaching the public storm and surface water system resulting from development, construction, grading, excavating, clearing, and any other activity which accelerates erosion. Per CWS regulations, the applicant is required-to submit an erosion control plan for City review and approval prior to issuance of City permits. The Federal Clean Water Act requires that a National Pollutant Discharge Elimination System (NPDES) erosion control permit be issued for any development that will disturb one or more acre of land. Since this site is over five acres, the developer will be required to obtain an NPDES permit from the City prior to construction. This permit will be issued along with the site and/or building permit. NOTICE OF TYPE II DECISION SDR2006-00008/PAUL SCHATZ MAJOR MODIFICATION PAGE 22 OF 24 Address Assignments: The City of Tigard is responsible for assigning addresses for parcels within the City of Tigard and within the Urban Service Boundary(USB). An addressing fee in the amount of $50.00 per address shall be assessed. This fee shall be paid to the City prior to issuance of building permits. The developer will also be required to provide signage at the entrance of each shared flag lot driveway or private street that lists the addresses that are served by the given driveway or street. This will assist emergency services personnel to more easily find a particular address. F. IMPACT STUDY Section 18.360.090 states, "The Director shall make a finding with respect to each of the following criteria when approving,approving with conditions or denying an application:" Section 18.390.040 states that the applicant shall provide an impact study to quantify the effect of development on public facilities and services. For each public facility system and type of impact, the study shall propose improvements necessary to meet City standard, and to minimize the impact of the development on the public at large, public facilities systems, and affected private property users. In situations where the Community Development Code requires the dedication of real property interests, the applicant shall either specifically concur with a requirement for public right-of-way dedication, or provide evidence that supports that the real property dedication is not roughly proportional to the projected impacts of the development. Section 18.390.040 states that when a condition of approval requires the transfer to the public of an interest in real property, the approval authority shall adopt findings which support the conclusion that the interest in real property to be transferred is roughly proportional to the impact the proposed development will have on the public. The proposal is to add a small addition to an existing commercial building. Impacts on sewer, water, and noise will be minimal. Traffic impact will be handled by payment of traffic impact fees and required street improvements. These improvements are minimal due to the existing pavement width of Bonita Road,which is the only street frontage for the site. The Washington County Traffic Impact Fee (TIF) is a mitigation measure that is required at the time of development. Based on a transportation impact study prepared by Mr. David Larson for the A-Boy Expansion/Dolan II/Resolution 95-61, TIF's are expected to recapture 32 percent of the traffic impact of new development on the Collector and Arterial Street system. Based on the use and the size of the use proposed, the applicant is required to pay TIF's of approximately$1,596.00. Final TIF payment will be assessed at time of building permit submittal. Based on the estimate that total TIF fees cover 32 percent of the impact on major street improvements citywide a fee that would cover 100 percent of this projects traffic.impact is $4,987.50 ($17596 divided by.32). The difference between the TIF paid, and the full impact, is considered the unmitigated impact on the street system. Since the TIF to be aid is $1,596, the unmitigated impact has an estimated value of $3 391.50. Besides the TIF that mitigates for for of the projects im act on the transportation system, the applicant is required to construct a 6-foot sidewalk along the site's frontage, which is approximately 420 feet. At an estimated cost of $20.00 per lineal foot the sidewalk is valued at $8,400. In addition,the applicant is required to provide bike striping along Bonita Road or pay a fee-in-lieu in the amount of$1,642.50. The total value of these improvements is $10,042.50. The value of these improvements and right-of- way dedication is greater than the total value of the projected impact but are required to meet the street improvement requirements of 18.810.030. In addition, the applicant has proposed making the sidewalk improvements. SECTION VII. OTHER STAFF COMMENTS The City of Tigard Building Division has reviewed the proposal and had no comments. The City of Tigard Engineering Department was sent this proposal for review and the comments have been incorporated into this decision. NOTICE OF TYPE II DECISION SDR2006-00008/PAUL SQ-IATZ MAJOR MODIFICATION PAGE 23 OF 24 • The City of Tigard Police Department has reviewed this application and offered no comments or objections. The City of Tigard Public Works Department was sent a copy of the proposal, but no comments were received. SECTION VIII. AGENCY COMMENTS Tualatin Valley Fire and Rescue (TVF&R) and was sent a copy of the proposal, but no comments were received. Washington County Land Use and Transportation has reviewed the proposal and had no objections. SECTION IX PROCEDURE AND APPEAL INFORMATION Notice: Notice was posted at City Hall and mailed to: X The applicant and owners X Owner of record within the required distance X Affected government agencies Final Decision: THIS DECISION IS FINAL ON FEBRUARY 28,2007 AND BECOMES EFFECTIVE ON MARCH 15,2007 UNLESS AN APPEAL IS FILED. Appeal The decision of the Director (Type II Procedure) or Review Authority (Type II Administrative Appeal or Type III Procedure) is final for purposes of appeal on the date that it is mailed. Any party with standing as provided in Section 18.390.040.G.1. ma�yappeal this decision in accordance with Section 18.390.040.G.2. of the Tigard Community Development Code which provides that a written appeal together with the required fee shall be filed with the Director within ten (10) business days of the date the notice of the decision was mailed. The appeal fee schedule and forms are available from the Planning Division of Tigard City Hall, 13125 SW Hall B oulevard,Tigard,Oregon 97223. Unless the applicant is the appellant,the hearing on an appeal from the Director's Decision shall be confined to the specific issues identified in the written comments submitted by the parties during the comment period. Additional evidence concerning issues properly raised in the Notice of Appeal may be submitted by any party during the appeal hearing,subject to any additional rules of procedure that may be adopted from time to time by the appellate body. THE DEADLINE FOR FILING AN APPEAL IS AT 5:00 PM ON MARCH 14,2007. stions: Ie any questions, please call the City of Tigard Planning Division, Tigard City Hall, 13125 SW Hall Boulevard,Tigard,Oregon at(503) 639-4171. Q �c ✓L(.�J February 28,2007 PREPARE BY: Cheryl Caines DATE Assistant Assistant Planner i \curpin\cheryl\sdr\Paul Schatz(SDR2006-00008)\sdr2006-00008 decision.doc NOTICE OF TYPE II DECISION SDR2006-00008/PAUL SCI-IATZ MAJOR MODIFICATION PAGE 24 OF 24 CITY of TIGARD GEOGRAPHIC INFORMATION SYSTEM \ VICINITY MAP G1 `�AN.MARK LN Mai SDR2006-00008 OW MEADOWS RO VAR2006-00086 PAUL SCHATZ a I MODIFICATION z in \ _ I ■ ..--- _ . II BONITA RD ) !,.\•Zi. -•• •. •SFE'y —\ ; s,'s :. .Mi ; � P4!It f ON1, ,,,,, % , r . lim MINI 4' '- to im nommon ■■■ �k. .A. -- 'im II :i. .R .I.. .r - 0. ,1 \ 1.111111 ■■■■■■I■Ii■ — �, ■■■■■ • m ► 111111111111111■I " I1 CARDINAL LN 1aIIIjluI1II� _ 1 486 feet r ••�Z ' ■ TIGARI) Information on this map is for general location only and 0 200 400 600 Feet 1,11 " 1 NM 11 REDWOOD LN /^ • • should be verified wdh the Development Services Division / ' ♦ 13125 SW Hall Blvd •- A Tigard. 97223 . - AL_ fa (503)63 tiyard http.//www.cLGgard.tx.us Community Development Plot date:Dec 22,2006;C:lmagicMAGIC03.APR — Keynotes 0�� ---I SW SONITA r 6e6rr.e..PLTmu /y1�, .z=xc*Ar.Y , _.c�...Rrn P.rerfc Ale u...rwre MID _ rNC 11.x.' :�nitfr•.em lel.ulx.rwr..l !.f.ir..ttSOI=114YW4..Ir MRORFN DESIGN GROUP PC. .r, ..,, '*�-� .NIT m l..r x'y!'► ..4n� it o4slrfc il.e..l[ S.W.B..,.a n.1o...c #�.w .'�:-..rr.. ��a$l�i�rC'e�i�40r irtM t• V 7 TVINCEL 7660 r Bemm.s,..Ip E�j,i �±•!'if� ��+.ci�. _� Y.i's:. - '� I 4 Emsrn�aro air..ro four ry.,a,arn.,wx2�essx FI _ _ f,"1(,.u0l OMR 101ff 0 COMM TOT.If4 WE tlm„ra 1.503/7460E62 R ....4 avT — - 4 — a 1 '_. �r0 01!W.rr rlbf PI PI PI Ti B `l74`r 6 ra.Ps.CEa. i°' , is, O O ° 1 1..61 sr.w MO AMOR. g_ .............. --4•r,ew4 l.R,) •■ I 1 I.MwfC Eswfs 0 >a m4..rfa!a 9¢r.u=MI.mrlf)fAL N'4 d so 1r-r) I.Y-E•(.AT r-r) se-o-f4.1 r_.7 • 1 r4.r.lAcassf lL v �� 0 y.'r'•LL"14'4L - I ' r-r t r-r r-r --�--I ,,NI NEW w 1�4�0 r=[°.11.70 >• �i ———— I =r-,.p.T 4'-r) Y 1l fmlr MST.oo.ocrr..0 111111�� _ fr-r f=.r r n f4"r`V WW1 NOWT..MO w°loam.,CANOc 11111111 lsM— .. C► - 1-r r-r Yd r-r ► 1 , 4 NEW!r uwi.a=NON ao w amr u.e.Yz �' ���11fa■■■■■■1lI>tINIVI_ I I IR r 1 • _ • 1 MI i .0 se IlX sex 2CRIMQVIV4 ■•X=CIMM s sk p� 1 Curb Types ■ E. OA - . -®,r. 5•yr' (1 - EXISTING arm ru a fmfmm W..*Parcel 2 ���\\\\\\\\\�.�\r�Illi- : .-® gyp: y� " `r`LYM4 • LI it y I C.T r PLACE mfarrr are 14 GOO III 1. t∎.. N,I j Parcel) 1 �.Il�`�'y` ©l till 0'1 fOClie _ Paul • 4 H1 eu�DNO MO . EXISTING e R MINI EXPANSION M°m ,l '7I ,t Schatz 111 Bl1LDNKi ■ Utl' G 4,746 SF !.frw.ri yy IT 174Nf U4 i :� 0 I� rr.1T4A RI ° MOO 4M Bona R4 Ail 9 b 1 T.re.om.srn. ill NI "i Ill fl EXISTING - ° 8 Schatz • �I■ ® 31.745 !t• ` ` 1 Furniture ■. ■ 1 ■ ,PTO, [ .® = d T —j— f,r Q 6600 S.Bonds Rd ■ M - ter, !'-4 r It-V. '_4. / 1'1"omx.rim ' ■ I ��1 Itt y, Y �—I I , Shed Telt DS.� J - ' m IN > _• 1; ; 1 CC Site Plan o rI. `.i Ili '? J ti -kr = I Z t, r-- Z t rL '4'rm n ° ■•a .. � 1R116R1ri® T■ _ M =O i ; L___ _____D . . /� Rafe.e N �,_` °' F.01150* 113!P �� .Wain IAN' \ �-/ /I nig? ° y I o : NMM/neltit,li'lk' ::lei - Ty m FINAL APPROVAL .1.WA Y .„,411-4--/ {y� \` l'�/Y 1` °r 1 ' .6- 1 CITY OF rIGAhO PLANNING misiow 9 I al 'DTI 0 I, � N$; f 1 1 ...&... if ! ......... ! Ilij; lL.irO Ow IO © 'B' °i yfr '�7s1b ��' =;r \o• MEW Clocked ■rWNY..4w J.4 Norte: 1B6Bf1 l Site Plan I She. I r3'71(710 40 = Design Review Re-Submittal-December 2006 A1.1 EXHIBITCo PACA Properties,LLC SDR2006-00008/VAR2006-00086 6600 SW Bonita Road PAUL SCHATZ MAJOR MOD. Tigard, OR 97224 Mildren Design Group,P.C. Ann: Gene Mildren 7650 SW Beveland Street, Suite 120 Tigard, OR 97223 Atiyeh Bros. Attn: Mark McGirr 6750 SW Bonita Road Tigard, OR 97224 AFFIDAVIT OF MAILING Eliti I, Patricia L. Lunsford, being first duly sworn/affirm,on oath depose and say that I am a Senior Administrative Specialist for the City of Tigard,Washington County,Oregon and that I served the following: {Qieck App ry BOX(s)&k w} © NOTICE OF DECISION FOR SDR2006-00008/VAR2006-00086- PAUL SCHATZ FURNITURE MAJOR MODIFICATION (File No./Name Reference) 0 AMENDED NOTICE ® City of Tigard Planning Director A copy of the said notice being hereto attached,marked Exhibit"A",and by reference made a part hereof,was mailed to each named person(s) at the address(s) shown on the attached list(s),marked Exhibit"B",and by reference made a part hereof,on Feb . • 28,2007,and deposited in the United States Mail on February28,2007,postage prepaid. Ir ,ill,14,- - t:/,/6{_,/ (Person that re Notice) l I STATE OF OREGON County of Washington ss. City of Tigard y� Subscribed and sworn/affirmed before me on the v day of L-14/a ,2007. 1a?; OFFICIAL SEAL j ,a~ DIANE M JELDERKS 1 1 `' . - NOTARY PU$LIC-01;;?aON 0 ,"` COMMISSION NO.373 � - MY COI: ,�:ON EXPIRES SEPT.25,20071 ,[/ p )1(. -.i C lee/r 41--- ��~�� ,.-_-....,.........N._----.......~--`' • NOIrARY PUB poF OREGON My Commission Expires: 97.25/O, EXHIBIT_A NOTICE OF TYPE II DECISION U, SITE DEVELOPMENT REVIEW(SDR) 2006-00008 PAUL SCHATZ FURNITURE MAJOR MODIFICATION (Includes a 30-day extension) 120 DAYS t3/14/2007 SECTION I. APPLICATION SUMMARY FILE NAME: PAUL SCHATZ FURNITURE MAJOR MODIFICATION CASE NOS.: Site Development Review(SDR) SDR2006-00008 Variance (VAR) VAR2006-00086 PROPOSAL: The applicant is requesting Site Development Review approval to construct a 4,746 square foot addition to an existing commercial building and to modify the parking areas and drive aisles. A Variance has also been requested to reduce the access width from 50 feet with 40 feet of pavement to 37 feet with 30 feet of pavement. OWNER: PACA Properties,LLC 6600 SW Bonita Rd. Tigard, OR 97224 APPLICANT: Mildren Design Group,P.C. Ann:Gene Mildren 7650 SW Beveland St., Suite 120 Tigard, OR 97223 LOCATION: 6600 SW Bonita Road;WCTM 2S112AD,Tax Lot 1100. ZONE: I-P: Industrial Park District. The I-P zoning district provides appropriate locations for combining light manufacturing, office and small-scale commercial uses, e.g., restaurants, personal services and fitness centers, in a campus-like setting. Only those light industrial uses with no off-site impacts, e.g. noise, glares odor,vibration are permitted in the I-P zone. In addition to mandatory site development review, design and development standards in the I-P zone have been adopted to insure that developments will be well-integrated, attractively landscaped, and pedestrian-friendly. APPLICABLE REVIEW CRITERIA: Community Development Code Chapters 18.360, 18.370, 18.390, 18.530, 18.705, 18.725, 18.745, 18.755, 18.765, 18.780, 18.790, 18.795 and 18.810. SECTION II. DECISION Notice is hereby given that the City of Tigard Community Development Director's designee has APPROVED the above request. The findings and conclusions on which the decision is based are noted in the full decision, available at City Hall. THIS APPROVAL SHALL BE VALID FOR 18 MONTHS FROM THE EFFECTIVE DATE OF THIS DECISION. All documents and applicable criteria in the above-noted file are available for inspection at no cost or copies can be obtained for twenty-five cents (250 per page,or the current rate charged for copies at the time of the request. SECTION III. PROCEDURE AND APPEAL INFORMATION Notice: Notice mailed to: X The applicant and owners X Owner of record within the required distance X Affected government agencies Final Decision: THIS DECISION IS FINAL ON FEBRUARY 28, 2007 AND BECOMES EFFECTIVE ON MARCH 15, 2007 UNLESS AN APPEAL IS FILED. Appe-al-: The Director's Decision is final on the date that it is mailed. All persons entitled to notice or who are otherwise adversely affected or aggrieved by the decision as provided in Section 18.390.040.G.1 may appeal this decision in accordance with Section 18.390.040.G.2 of the Tigard Community Development Code which provides that a written appeal together with the required fee shall be filed with the Director within ten (10) business days of the date the Notice of Decision was mailed. The appeal fee schedule and forms are available from the Planning Division of Tigard City Hall, 13125 SW Hall Boulevard, Tigard, Oregon 97223. Unless the applicant is the appellant,the hearing on an appeal from the Director's Decision shall be confined to the specific issues identified in the written comments submitted by the parties during the comment period. Additional evidence concerning issues properly raised in the Notice of Appeal may be submitted by any party during the appeal hearing,subject to any additional rules of procedure that maybe adopted from time to time by the appellate body. THE DEADLINE FOR FILING AN APPEAL IS 5:00 PM ON MARCH 14, 2007. estions: For urt informationlplease contact the Planning Division Staff Planner, Cheryl Caines at (503) 639-4171,Tigard City Hall, 13125 SW Hall Boulevard,Tigard, Oregon 97223. t`„ NO.■ VICINITY MAP i_ _ ' il SDR2006-00008 VAR2006-00086 PAUL SCHATZ MI :n MAJOR 11111 N MODIFICATION al L mow III 111111 1 lil ilia s‘ss MEM .. _mum ir=ii i Rk; WOO11..'■■1■ ■■■ r ___ Ag 4 _ - �"�111111111111111N111� Fi rIIIII�....�,." N ll 1 iiktil=i= :. , _ N _T a ^ • — - - ▪ --_ _ avmr,"I --I■i.il%_-- 11 ■ illc_YAI �aa _ jft.- . w f ' C : I { Paul o ua Fvu �` - . — _ I N __c_,X �_ Sae Pim 1 c�l, �llfml!lN F7lli' •Sei FINAL APPROVAL On IX nom.RAMO.DIVN101■ • O ii7-0 d r,+!•� A'�.� *vim o' L�� !1.akrc�. .AL— .J -� Milk {mom tC���� -.-�°.��.� 7i-��• � � ziiil- • 2S112AD-01200 21E07BC05404 EXH I B IT(I3 ATIYEH BROS INC HOME BLDR ASN METRO PTLD 6750 SW BONITA RD 15555 SW BANGY RD TIGARD, OR 97224 LAKE OSWEGO OR, 97035 21E07BC06100 21E07BC08800 BENAVIDES LISA C LAKE OSWEGO TOWNHOMES HMOWNRS 15471 BRIANNE CT ASSOC LAKE OSWEGO OR, 97035 14511 WESTLAKE DR LAKE OSWEGO OR, 97035 2S112AA-00600 21E07BC01200 CALWEST INDUSTRIAL HOLDINGS LLC LOCKWOOD MICHAEL P&TANYA BY ePROPERTYTAX INC 2610 SOUTH SHORE BLVD DEPT#207 LAKE OSWEGO OR, 97034 PO BOX 4900 SCOTTSDALE,AZ 85261 2S112AA-00400 21E07BC01100 CAL • ST IN' STRIAL HOLDINGS LLC MCHUGH PHILIP BY ePR•'�'TYTAX INC 9725 SW BEAVERTON HILLSDALE HWY STE DEPT • 17 BEAVERTON OR, 97005 PO :•X4900 OTTSDALE,AZ 85261 2S112AA-00500 21E07BC06000 CALWEST INDUSTRIAL HOLDINGS LLC MOIR THOMAS BY e• -OP •TYTAX INC 18068 HOBBIT CT DEPT# .• LAKE OSWEGO OR, 97034 PO :. 4901 OTTSDALE,AZ 85261 21 E07BC05700 21E078C05900 CHEN JAMES MORGAN KELLY JO 47957 AVALON HEIGHTS 2204 N SKIDMORE CT FREMONT CA, 94539 PORTLAND OR, 97217 21E07BB00902 2S112AD-01100 COLUMBIA RIVER GIRL SCOUTS PACA PROPERTIES LLC PO BOX 2427 6600 SW BONITA RD LAKE OSWEGO OR, 97035 TIGARD,OR 97224 21E07BC05800 2S112AD-01300 DAVIS MARGAUX PACIFIC REALTY ASSOCIATES 15483 BRIANNE CT ATTN: N PIVEN LAKE OSWEGO OR, 97035 15350 SW SEQUOIA PKWY#300 PORTLAND,OR 97224 2S112AD-00900 21E07BB00900 HD DEVELOPMENT OF MARYLAND INC PARKER FURNITURE INC 75% BY HOME DEPOT USA INC 10375 SW BEAVRTN-HLLSDL HWY PROPERTY TAX DEPT#4002 BEAVERTON OR, 97005 PO BOX 105842 ATLANTA, GA 30348 21E07BC05500 21E07BB0090 HINES DEREK J &SIBONEY M PA RNITURE INC 75% 1280 10TH ST 1037 S EAVRTN-HLLSDL HWY WEST LINN OR, 97068 AVERTON OR, 97005 21E07BC05600 2S112AD-00 $0 PORCELLI MARYANN SM S •HN E&MARIETTA D TRS 15491 BRIANNE CT PO B• •• LAKE OSWEGO OR, 97035 AU'•RA,OR 97002 2S112AD-00500 2S112AD-00 01 ROGERS MACHINERY CO INC S'.ETS J'. N E&MARIETTA D TRS PO BOX 230429 PO =' 560 PORTLAND,OR 97281 AU'• , a' 97002 2S112AD-00501 21E07BC01400 R• ,ERS M•• INERY COMPANY TERCEK JOHN M&KATHY M INC 14108 KNAUS RD PO =! ' 0429 LAKE OSWEGO OR, 97034 P'RTLANI, •R 97281 2S112AD-00600 2S D-0 1 RYDER TRUCK RENTAL INC TIGA ITY OF LOC#1876 1312 W LL BLVD BY PROPERTY TAX DEPT 3B TIGARD,OR 97223 PO BOX 025719 MIAMI, FL 33102 21E07BC06200 2S112AD-00200 SANNIDHI DURGA UNION PACIFIC RAILROAD CO 15438 STEPHANIE CT PROPERTY TAX LAKE OSWEGO OR, 97035 1400 DOUGLAS STOP 1640 OMAHA, NE 68179 21E07BC05405 21E07BC01000 SHARFF FAMILY LLC UNITED DOMINION REALTY TRUST INC 55 NW 95TH AVE PO BOX 4900 DEPT 111 PORTLAND OR, 97229 SCOTTSDALE AZ, 85261 21E07 C05406 2S112AD-00700 SHAR F LY LLC UNITED PIPE&SUPPLY CO INC 55 NW E 7600 SE JOHNSON CREEK BLVD P LAND OR, 97229 PORTLAND,OR 97206 21E07BC0545: SHA' • AMILY LLC 55 ■ • TH AVE ••RTLAN• •R, 97229 21E07BC05401 SIMPSON JUDITH S 55 NW 95TH AVE PORTLAND OR, 97229 2S1 12A D-00400 SMETS JOHN E& MARIETTA D TRS PO BOX 560 AURORA,OR 97002 Nathan and Ann Murdock Mildren Design Group PO Box 231265 Attn: Gene Mildren Tigard OR 97281 7650 SW Beveland Street, Suite 120 Tigard, OR 97223 Sue Rorman Susan Beilke 11250 SW 82nd Avenue 11755 SW 114th Place Tigard, OR 97223 Tigard, OR 97223 Naomi Gallucci 11285 SW 78th Avenue Tigard, OR 97223 Diane Baldwin 3706 Kinsale Lane SE Olympia, WA 98501 Brad Spring 7555 SW Spruce Street Tigard, OR 97223 Alexander Craghead 12205 SW Hall Boulevard Tigard, OR 97223-6210 Gretchen Buehner 13249 SW 136th Place Tigard, OR 97224 John Frewing 7110 SW Lola Lane Tigard, OR 97223 CPO 4B 16200 SW Pacific Highway, Suite H242 Tigard, OR 97224 CPO 4M Pat Whiting 8122 SW Spruce Tigard, OR 97223 CITY OF TIGARD - EAST INTERESTED PARTIES (i:\curpin\setup\labels\CIT East.doc) UPDATED: 12-Dec-06 AFFIDAVIT OF MAILING I, Patricia L. Lunsford, being first du�lysworn/affirm,on oath depose and say that I am a Senior Administrative Specialist for the City of Tigard,Washington County,Oregon and that I served the following: law,APP. Box(x)' ; © NOTICE OF PENDING LAND USE DECISION FOR SDR2006-00008/VAR2006-00086 - PAUL SCHATZ MAJOR MODIFICATION El AMENDED NOTICE (File No/Na ne Reference) ® City of Tigard Planning Director A copy of the said notice being hereto attached,marked Exhibit"A",and by reference made a part hereof,was mailed to each named person(s) at the address(s) shown on the attached list(s),marked Exhibit"B",and by reference made a part hereof,on December 26,2006,and deposited in the United States Mail on December 26,2006,postage prepaid. (Person that • . -. Notic- STATE OF OREGON County of Washington ss. City of Tigard Subscribed and sworn/affirmed before me on the gl s day of Q,otu ,2007 _��` OFFICIAL SEAL J DIANE M JELDERKS (}NOTAN COMMISSION N0.373021 ) MY COMMISSION EXPIRES SEPT.25,2007/ ` --�-� NO ARY PUBLI ♦�T O' GON My Commission Expires: EXHIBIT NOTICE TO MORTGAGEE,LIENHOLDER,VENDOR OR SELLER: THE TIGARD DEVELOPMENT CODE REQUIRES THAT IF YOU RECEIVE THIS NOTICE,IT SHALL BE PROMPTLY FORWARDED TO THE PURCHASER NOTICE OF PENDING LAND USE APPLICATION SITE DEVELOPMENT REVIEW TIGARD DATE OF NOTICE: December 26,2006 FILE NUMBERS: SITE DEVELOPMENT REVIEW(SDR) 2006-00008 (Type II Land Use Application) VARIANCE (VAR) 2006-00086 FILE NAME: PAUL SCHATZ MAJOR MODIFICATION REQUEST: The applicant is requesting approval to construct a 4,746 square foot addition to an existing commercial building and to modify the parking areas and drive aisles. A variance has also been requested to reduce the access width from 50 feet with 40 feet of pavement to 37 feet with 30 feet of pavement. LOCATION: 6600 SW Bonita Road;Washington County Tax Map 2S112AD,Tax Lot 1100. ZONE: I-P: Industrial Park District. The I-P zoning district provides appropriate locations for combining light manufacturing, office and small-scale commercial uses,e.g.,restaurants,personal services and fitness centers, in a campus-like setting. Only those light industrial uses with no off-site impacts, e.g., noise, glare, odor, vibration, are permitted in the I-P zone. In addition to mandatory site development review, design and development standards in the I-P zone have been adopted to insure that developments will be well-integrated,attractively landscaped,and pedestrian-friendly. APPLICABLE REVIEW CRITERIA: Community Development Code Chapters 18.360, 18.370, 18.390, 18.530, 18.705, 18.725, 18.730, 18.745, 18.755, 18.765, 18.780, 18.790 and 18.810. YOUR RIGHT TO PROVIDE WRITTEN COMMENTS: Prior to the City making any decision on the Application,you are hereby provided a fourteen (14) day period to submit written comments on the application to the City. THE FOURTEEN (14) DAY PERIOD ENDS AT 5:00 PM ON JANUARY 9, 2007. All comments should be directed to Cheryl Caines, Assistant Planner in the Planning Division at the City of Tigard, 13125 SW Hall Boulevard, Tigard, Oregon 97223. You may reach the City of Tigard by telephone at 503.639.4171 x2434 or bye-mail to Cherylc @tigard-or.gov. ALL COMMENTS MUST BE RECEIVED BY THE CITY OF TIGARD IN WRITING PRIOR TO 5:00 PM ON THE DATE SPECIFIED ABOVE IN ORDER FOR YOUR COMMENTS TO BE CONSIDERED IN THE DECISION MAKING PROCESS THE CITY OF TIGARD APPRECIATES RECEIVING COMMENTS AND VALUES YOUR INPUT. COMMENTS WILL BE CONSIDERED AND ADDRESSED WITHIN THE NOTICE OF DECISION. A DECISION ON THIS ISSUE IS TENTATIVELY SCHEDULED FOR JANUARY 26, 2007. IF YOU PROVIDE COMMENTS, YOU WILL BE SENT A COPY OF THE FULL DECISION ONCE IT HAS BEEN RENDERED. WRIITTEN COMMENTS WILL BECOME A PART OF THE PERMANENT PUBLIC RECORD AND SHALL CONTAIN THE FOLLOWING INFORMATION: • Address the specific "Applicable Review Criteria" described in the section above or any other criteria believed to be applicable to this proposal; • Raise any issues and/or concerns believed to be important with sufficient evidence to allow the City to provide a response; • Comments that provide the basis for an appeal to the Tigard Hearings Officer must address the relevant approval criteria with sufficient specificity on that issue. Failure of any party to address the relevant approval criteria with sufficient specificity may preclude subsequent appeals to the Land Use Board of Appeals or Circuit Court on that issue. Specific findings directed at the relevant approval criteria are what constitute relevant evidence. AFTER THE 14 DAY COMMENT PERIOD CLOSES,THE DIRECTOR SHALL ISSUE A TYPE II ADMINISTRATIVE DECISION. THE DIRECTOR'S DECISION SHALL BE MAILED TO THE APPLICANT AND TO OWNERS OF RECORD OF PROPERTY LOCATED WITHIN 500 FEET OF THE SUBJECT SITE, AND TO ANYONE ELSE WHO SUBMTI lED WRITTEN COMMENTS OR WHO IS OTHERWISE ENTITLED TO NOTICE. THE DIRECTOR'S DECISION SHALL ADDRESS ALL OF THE RELEVANT APPROVAL CRITERIA. BASED UPON THE CRITERIA AND THE FACTS CONTAINED WITHIN THE RECORD, THE DIRECTOR SHALL APPROVE,APPROVE WITH CONDITIONS OR DENY THE REQUESTED PERMIT OR ACTION. SUMMARY OF THE DECISION-MAKING PROCESS: . The application is accepted by the City . Notice is sent to property owners of record within 500 feet of the proposed development area allowing a 14-day written comment period. . The application is reviewed by City Staff and affected agencies. . City Staff issues a written decision. . Notice of the decision is sent to the Applicant and all owners or contract purchasers of record of the site; all owners of record of property located within 500 feet of the site,as shown on the most recent property tax assessment roll;any City-recognized neighborhood group whose boundaries include the site; and any governmental agency which is entitled to notice under an intergovernmental agreement entered into with the City which includes provision for such notice or anyone who is otherwise entitled to such notice. INFORMATION/EVIDENCE AVAILABLE FOR REVIEW: The application,written comments and supporting documents relied upon by the Director to make this decision are contained within the record and are available for public review at the City of Tigard Community Development Department. If you want to inspect the file, please call and make an appointment with either the project planner or the planning technicians. Copies of these items may be obtained at a cost of $.25 per page or the current rate charged for this service. Questions regarding this application should be directed to the Planning Staff indicated on the first page of this Notice under the section titled "Your Right to Provide Written Comments." -------P.: _ Z ICINITY\TAP iiR SDR2OO6-U(N►08 V_kR201/6-(N.K186 1 11 MIR PAIL SCHATZ NIAIOR ''.\ ! .. MODIFICATION IP III 1 , i IINIPPI LT I _.isrrE r 717!! g -4.---..1---num-Z-Ni inui ii:i laj I Iloilo 1: :iii .......- -,,,ii ...111111111111111111111111111/01 pi All 11111111 RpN.L Lx mi. -1.,.�`�,� n , TIGARD 11 ....... ii. -1 4., ._..A.A1 nary Lev:.. ,nt •adate .:c I magc iii a• 2S112A0-01200 21E07BC05404 EXHIBIT ATIYEH BROS INC HOME BLDR ASN METRO PTLD 6750 SW BONITA RD 15555 SW BANGY RD TIGARD,OR 97224 LAKE OSWEGO OR, 97035 21E07BC06100 21E07BC08800 BENAVIDES LISA C LAKE OSWEGO TOWNHOMES HMOWNRS 15471 BRIANNE CT ASSOC LAKE OSWEGO OR, 97035 14511 WESTLAKE DR LAKE OSWEGO OR, 97035 2S112AA-00600 21E07BC01200 CALWEST INDUSTRIAL HOLDINGS LLC LOCKWOOD MICHAEL P&TANYA BY ePROPERTYTAX INC 2610 SOUTH SHORE BLVD DEPT#207 LAKE OSWEGO OR, 97034 PO BOX 4900 SCOTTSDALE,AZ 85261 2S112AA-00400 21E07BC01100 C LWEST IN STRIAL HOLDINGS LLC MCHUGH PHILIP BY e P TYTAX INC 9725 SW BEAVERTON HILLSDALE HWY STE DEPT 0 BEAVERTON OR, 97005 P9 gOX 490 S`COTTSDALE,AZ 85261 2S112AA-00500 21E07BC06000 C• EST IN STRIAL HOLDINGS LLC MOIR THOMAS BY eP •P' RTYTAX INC 18068 HOBBIT CT DEPT • I LAKE OSWEGO OR, 97034 P• 40X4911 SCOTTSDALE,AZ 85261 21 E07BC05700 21E07BC05900 CHEN JAMES MORGAN KELLY JO 47957 AVALON HEIGHTS 2204 N SKIDMORE CT FREMONT CA, 94539 PORTLAND OR, 97217 21E07BB00902 23112AD-01100 COLUMBIA RIVER GIRL SCOUTS PACA PROPERTIES LLC PO BOX 2427 6600 SW BONITA RD LAKE OSWEGO OR, 97035 TIGARD,OR 97224 21E07BC05800 2S112AD-01300 DAVIS MARGAUX PACIFIC REALTY ASSOCIATES 15483 BRIANNE CT ATTN: N PIVEN LAKE OSWEGO OR, 97035 15350 SW SEQUOIA PKWY#300 PORTLAND,OR 97224 2S112AD-00900 21E07E3E100900 HD DEVELOPMENT OF MARYLAND INC PARKER FURNITURE INC 75% BY HOME DEPOT USA INC 10375 SW BEAVRTN-HLLSDL HWY PROPERTY TAX DEPT#4002 BEAVERTON OR, 97005 PO BOX 105842 ATLANTA,GA 30348 21E07BC05500 21E07 00903 HINES DEREK J &SIBONEY M PARKE RNITURE INC 75% 1280 10TH ST 103 SW VRTN-HLLSDL HWY WEST LINN OR, 97068 AVERTON OR, 97005 21E07BC05600 2S112AD-00301 PORCELLI MARYANN SME - J•'N E&MARIETTA D TRS 15491 BRIANNE CT PO •60 LAKE OSWEGO OR, 97035 ' gRORA, • 97002 2S112AD-00500 2S112AD-0030 ROGERS MACHINERY CO INC SM J N E&MARIETTA D TRS PO BOX 230429 PO B 60 PORTLAND,OR 97281 A ORA,OR 97002 2S112AD-00501 21E07BC01400 RO RS M HINERY COMPANY TERCEK JOHN M&KATHY M INC 14108 KNAUS RD PO X 2 9 LAKE OSWEGO OR, 97034 RTLAND,OR 97281 2S112AD-00600 2S1. 2AD-0040 RYDER TRUCK RENTAL INC TIGA Y OF LOC#1876 1312 LL BLVD BY PROPERTY TAX DEPT 3B TI RD,OR 97223 PO BOX 025719 MIAMI, FL 33102 21E07BC06200 2S112A0-00200 SANNIDHI DURGA UNION PACIFIC RAILROAD CO 15438 STEPHANIE CT PROPERTY TAX LAKE OSWEGO OR, 97035 1400 DOUGLAS STOP 1640 OMAHA, NE 68179 21E07BC05405 21E07BC01000 SHARFF FAMILY LLC UNITED DOMINION REALTY TRUST INC 55 NW 95TH AVE PO BOX 4900 DEPT 111 PORTLAND OR, 97229 SCOTTSDALE AZ, 85261 21E BC05406 2S1 12AD-00700 SHA F F ILY LLC UNITED PIPE&SUPPLY CO INC 55 N TH AVE 7600 SE JOHNSON CREEK BLVD TLAN OR, 97229 PORTLAND,OR 97206 21E07BC05400 SHA FA LY LLC 55 NW 9 AVE PO ND OR, 97229 21 E07BC05401 SIMPSON JUDITH S 55 NW 95TH AVE PORTLAND OR, 97229 2S 112AD-00400 SMETS JOHN E& MARIETTA D TRS PO BOX 560 AURORA,OR 97002 Nathan and Ann Murdock Mildren Design Group PO Box 231265 Attn: Gene Mildren Tigard, OR 97281 7650 SW Beveland Street, Suite 120 Tigard, OR 97223 Sue Rorman Susan Beilke 11250 SW 82nd Avenue 11755 SW 114th Place Tigard, OR 97223 Tigard, OR 97223 Naomi Gallucci 11285 SW 78th Avenue Tigard, OR 97223 Diane Baldwin 3706 Kinsale Lane SE Olympia, WA 98501 Brad Spring 7555 SW Spruce Street Tigard, OR 97223 Alexander Craghead 12205 SW Hall Boulevard Tigard, OR 97223-6210 Gretchen Buehner 13249 SW 136th Place Tigard, OR 97224 John Frewing 7110 SW Lola Lane Tigard, OR 97223 CPO 4B 16200 SW Pacific Highway, Suite H242 Tigard, OR 97224 CPO 4M Pat Whiting 8122 SW Spruce Tigard, OR 97223 CITY OF TIGARD - EAST INTERESTED PARTIES (i:\curpin\setup\labels\CIT East.doc) UPDATED: 12-Dec-06 PACA Properties, LLC SDR2006-00008/VAR2006-00086 6600 SW Bonita Road PAUL SCHATZ MAJOR MOD. Tigard, OR 97224 Mildren Design Group,P.0 Attn: Gene Mildren 7650 SW Beveland Street, Suite 120 Tigard, OR 97223 AFFIDAVIT OF POSTING NOTICE �-- OF A LAND USE PROPOSAL TIGARD IMPORTANT NOTICE: THIS AFFIDAVIT MUST BE ACCOMPANIED BY A COPY OF THE NOTICE THAT WAS POSTED ON THE SITE. In the Matter of the Proposed Land Use Applications for Land Use File Nos.: SDR2006-00008/VAR2006-00086 Land Use File Name: PAUL SCHATZ MAJOR MODIFICATION I,Cheryl Caines.Assistant Planner for the City of Tigard,do affirm that I posted notice of the land use proposal affecting the land located at (state the approximate location(s) IF no address(s) and/or tax lot(s) currently registered) (o 400 s W $ant -la- Rd. and did personally post notice of the proposed land use application(s)by means of weatherproof posting in the general vicinity of the affected territory, a copy of said notice being hereto attached and by reference made a part hereof, on the 3r ci day of :Tar) / ,200 ) . CA/24, a. Signature of Person Who Performed Posting h:\bgut\patty\masters\affidavit of posting for applinnt to post pubbc hearing.doc • Carole A. Moore Carole A Moore 7141 SW Mapleleaf Court 7141 SW Mapleleaf Court Tigard, Oregon 97223 Tigard, Oregon 97223 Carole A. Moore Carole A. Moore 7141 SW Mapleleaf Court 7141 SW Mapleleaf Court Tigard, Oregon 97223 Tigard. Oregon 97223 Rene Valencia Ramirez, Rosalba Valencia, Rene Valencia Ramirez, Rosalba Valencia. Jennifer Ramirez, All Occupants, and all others Jennifer Ramirez,All Occupants,and all others p 16283 3 SW 92ND AVE, 16283 SW 92ND AVE, Tigard. Oregon 97223 Tigard, Oregon 97223 Rene Valencia Ramirez, Rosalba Valencia, Rene Valencia Ramirez, Rosalba Valencia, Jennifer Ramirez,All Occupants. and all others Jennifer Ramirez, All Occupants, and all others 16283 SW 92ND AVE,Tigard.Oregon 97223 16283 SW 92ND AVE, Tigard, Oregon 97223 Lindsey I.And Daniel L.Jr Bozich. and all others Lindsey I. And Daniel L. Jr Bozich, and all others 8685 SW McDonald St, 8685 SW McDonald St, Tigard, Oregon 97223 Tigard, Oregon 97223 Lindsey I. And Daniel L. Jr Bozich, and all others Lindsey I.And Daniel L.Jr Bozich,and all others 8685 SW McDonald St, 8685 SW McDonald St, Tigard, Oregon 97223 Tigard, Oregon 97223 PAUL SCHATZ MAJOR MODIFICATION SITE DEVELOPMENT REVIEW (SDR) 2006-00008/ - VARIANCE (VAR) 2006-00086 REQUEST: The applicant is requesting approval to construct a 4,746 square foot addition to an existing commercial building and to modify the parking areas and drive aisles. A variance has also been requested to reduce the access width from 50 feet with 40 feet of pavement to 37 feet with 30 feet of pavement. LOCATION: 6600 'W Bonita Road; Washington County Tax Map 2S112AD, Tax Lot 1100. ZONE: I-P: Industrial Park District. The I-P zoning district provides appropriate locations for combining light manufacturing, office and small-scale commercial uses, e.g., restaurants, personal services and fitness centers, in a campus-like setting. Only those light industrial uses with no off-site impacts, e.g., noise, glare, odor, vibration, are permitted in the I-P zone. In addition to mandatory site development review, design and development standards in the I-P zone have been adopted to insure that developments will be well- integrated, attractively landscaped, and pedestrian-friendly. APPLICABLE REVI' 1 CRITERIA: Community Development Code Chapters 18.360, 18.370, 18.390, 18.530, 18.705, 18.725, 18.730, 18.745, 18.755, 18.765, 18.780, 18.790 and 18.810. Further information may be obtained from the Planning Division (staff contact: Cheryl Gaines, Assistant Planner) at 13125 SW Hall Blvd., Tigard, Oregon 97223, or by calling 503-639-4171 or by email to Cherylc@tigard-or.gov. A copy of the application and all documents and evidence submitted by or on behalf of the applicant and the applicable criteria are available for inspection at no cost and copies for all items can also be provided at a reasonable cost. CITY of TIGARD hin Tilfall GEOGRAPHIC INFORMATION SYSTEM AREA NOTIFIED aw MEADOWS RD 500 FEET 11 mil MEADOWS S Ro SDR2006-00008 ..� VAR2006-00086 a Z ""'"""' PAUL SCHATZ N Lo Lil MAJOR u'°'""" MODIFICATION UPDATED 71117AAe0100 MAILING LIST //^ \ / SFERR 711110.000101 11117Aa , FE m� /NIL 1 11FB)BC11� ig pR� 71117ABnBa1 71EOIBC01100 nn7,s asB asnaaoaolaB � �a asnaalaolBB asnN ism ,\`�� .a� ► � \ � 71Emaco1700 -- „1,.. ■ ..... _ . � Q 14., .... mum . ,.. .... ___"... - 11111AOBBBN m 1 .»_,.' '. '- pEFeENO RD • - gt • Met I ■ ■ g■ 1 d Area Map D n oncowa ■ ■1t .Iijiji 11111 ■ n ■ MINIM ,■■■■■.1111 0 200 400 600 Reet c P1II1uiIiij \ l CARDINAL LN 11111pAlloneimmi _ ell F InformaUOn on this map is for general location only and should be venfied with the Development Services Division. - 13125 SW Hall Blvd' /_ _- Tigard,OR 97223 (503)639-4171 htlP I/www_ci.tiga b.or.us Community Development Plot date:Dec 22,2006;C:\magicMAGIC03.APR -. 2S112AD-01200 21E07BC05404 ATIYEH BROS INC HOME BLDR ASN METRO PTLD 6750 SW BONITA RD 15555 SW BANGY RD TIGARD,OR 97224 LAKE OSWEGO OR, 97035 21E07BC06100 21E07BC08800 BENAVIDES LISA C LAKE OSWEGO TOWNHOMES HMOWNRS 15471 BRIANNE CT ASSOC LAKE OSWEGO OR, 97035 14511 WESTLAKE DR LAKE OSWEGO OR, 97035 2S112AA-00600 21E07BC01200 CALWEST INDUSTRIAL HOLDINGS LLC LOCKWOOD MICHAEL P&TANYA BY ePROPERTYTAX INC 2610 SOUTH SHORE BLVD DEPT#207 LAKE OSWEGO OR, 97034 PO BOX 4900 SCOTTSDALE,AZ 85261 2S112AA-00400 21E07BC01100 CALWEST IN STRIAL HOLDINGS LLC MCHUGH PHILIP PROP TYTAX INC 9725 SW BEAVERTON HILLSDALE HWY STE DEP 7 BEAVERTON OR, 97005 P9BOX 0 COTTSDALE,AZ 85261 2S112AA-00500 21E07BC06000 C' WEST INDU TRIAL HOLDINGS LLC MOIR THOMAS BY --ROPE: TAX INC 18068 HOBBIT CT DEPT LAKE OSWEGO OR, 97034 PO :% -10 = •TTSDALE,AZ 85261 21E07BC05700 21E07BC05900 CHEN JAMES MORGAN KELLY JO 47957 AVALON HEIGHTS 2204 N SKIDMORE CT FREMONT CA, 94539 PORTLAND OR, 97217 21E07BB00902 2S112AD-01100 COLUMBIA RIVER GIRL SCOUTS PACA PROPERTIES LLC PO BOX 2427 6600 SW BONITA RD LAKE OSWEGO OR, 97035 TIGARD,OR 97224 21 E07BC05800 2S112AD-01300 DAVIS MARGAUX PACIFIC REALTY ASSOCIATES 15483 BRIANNE CT ATTN: N PIVEN LAKE OSWEGO OR, 97035 15350 SW SEQUOIA PKWY#300 PORTLAND,OR 97224 2S112AD-00900 21E07BB00900 HD DEVELOPMENT OF MARYLAND INC PARKER FURNITURE INC 75% BY HOME DEPOT USA INC 10375 SW BEAVRTN-HLLSDL HWY PROPERTY TAX DEPT#4002 BEAVERTON OR, 97005 PO BOX 105842 ATLANTA,GA 30348 21E07BC05500 21E07BB00903 HINES DEREK J&SIBONEY M P ER F RNITURE INC 75% 1280 10TH ST 10375 BEAVRTN-HLLSDL HWY WEST LINN OR, 97068 VERTO R, 97005 • 21 E07BC05600 2S112AD-003 PORCELLI MARYANN S HN E&MARIETTA D TRS 15491 BRIANNE CT P 0 LAKE OSWEGO OR, 97035 URORA,OR 97002 2S112AD-00500 2S112A0-00301 ROGERS MACHINERY CO INC S TS JO &MARIETTA D TRS PO BOX 230429 PO B 60 PORTLAND,OR 97281 ORA, 97002 2S112AD-00501 21E07BC01400 ROGERS MACHINERY COMPANY TERCEK JOHN M&KATHY M INC 14108 KNAUS RD PO BOX 230429 LAKE OSWEGO OR, 97034 PORTLAND,OR 97281 2S112A0-00600 2 112AD-00401 RYDER TRUCK RENTAL INC TI RD OF LOC#1876 1312 HALL BLVD BY PROPERTY TAX DEPT 3B ARD, 97223 PO BOX 025719 MIAMI, FL 33102 21E07BC06200 2S112AD-00200 SANNIDHI DURGA UNION PACIFIC RAILROAD CO 15438 STEPHANIE CT PROPERTY TAX LAKE OSWEGO OR, 97035 1400 DOUGLAS STOP 1640 OMAHA,NE 68179 21E07BC05405 21E07BC01000 SHARFF FAMILY LLC UNITED DOMINION REALTY TRUST INC 55 NW 95TH AVE PO BOX 4900 DEPT 111 PORTLAND OR, 97229 SCOTTSDALE AZ, 85261 21E07BC05406 25112AD-00700 SH F FA Y LLC UNITED PIPE&SUPPLY CO INC 55 NW AVE 7600 SE JOHNSON CREEK BLVD P LAND 97229 PORTLAND,OR 97206 21 7BC05400 SHA F F LY LLC 55 AVE RTLAND 97229 21E07BC05401 SIMPSON JUDITH S 55 NW 95TH AVE PORTLAND OR, 97229 25112AD-00400 SMETS JOHN E& MARIETTA D TRS PO BOX 560 AURORA,OR 97002 Nathan and Ann Murdock Mildren Design group PO Box 231265 Attn: Gene Mildren Tigard, OR 97281 7650 SW Beveland Street, Suite 120 Tigard, OR 97223 Sue Rorman Susan Beilke 11250 SW 82nd Avenue 11755 SW 114th Place Tigard, OR 97223 Tigard, OR 97223 Naomi Gallucci 11285 SW 78th Avenue Tigard, OR 97223 Diane Baldwin 3706 Kinsale Lane SE Olympia, WA 98501 Brad Spring 7555 SW Spruce Street Tigard, OR 97223 Alexander Craghead 12205 SW Hall Boulevard Tigard, OR 97223-6210 Gretchen Buehner 13249 SW 136th Place Tigard, OR 97224 John Frewing 7110 SW Lola Lane Tigard, OR 97223 CPO 4B 16200 SW Pacific Highway, Suite H242 Tigard, OR 97224 CPO 4M Pat Whiting 8122 SW Spruce Tigard, OR 97223 CITY OF TIGARD - EAST INTERESTED PARTIES (i:\curpin\setup\labels\CIT East.doc) UPDATED: 12-Dec-06 l�r rf owne-r * ieeffrd 2S112AD-01100 (� l PACA PROPERTIES LLC Q-S D"� /6/°2 6600 SW BONITA RD TIGARD,OR 97224 • PRE-APP.HELD BY: CITY OF TIGARD PLANNING DIVISION 13125 SW HALL BOULEVARD TIGARD, OR 97223-8189 , 503.639.4171/503.684.7297 Lr6/VCO CITY OF TIGARD OREGON LAND USE PERMIT APPLICATION P L 9 ?^^s File# .sbe, 0!•'r; g Other Case # Date `j((9/Ole By TgaciI Receipt # :;e1-X'zi`-W City Urb Date Complete TYPE OF PERMIT YOU ARE APPLYING FOR ❑Adjustment/Variance (I or II) ❑ Minor Land Partition (II) ❑ Zone Change (III) ❑ Comprehensive Plan Amendment (IV) ❑ Planned Development (III) ❑ Zone Change Annexation (IV) ❑ Conditional Use (III) ❑ Sensitive Lands Review I, II or III)) ❑ Zone Ordinance Amendment (IV) ❑ Historic Overlay (II or III) (24 Site Development Review (II) ❑ Home Occupation (II) ❑ Subdivision (II or III) LUCA I ION WHERE PROPOSED AC I WI I Y WILL OCCUR(Address it available) Cp('CO G✓Wn/ 04ne•1 I T.t o , TI(c14r2,1Q, ne...ec=ice4 I AX MAP& IAXLUI NUS. TA ' L -r IIDO , tyyri ZS I - IZIA4C, F�2.C.E L, I , PARM rca-.I ntetT Z 000—0 20 , N a 1/4 s 12 , T 2s) TO I AL SI I E SIZE ZONING CLASSIFICATION 1271 /22 S. F. APPLICAN I' MIL J O --7S1 4 �RZpU(� , R. . MAILING ADDRESS/CI I Y/S I A I E/LIP 7Co5o Sw vEL d ST. , (TE IZ©, • 1 972 Z PHONE NU. FAX NO .2,+q SG 2 CS0 3,) 244 . o41 PRIMARY CON IA(.I PERSON PHONE NU. Can. Mltr ,J ( c) 2 - ass 2. PROPER I Y OWNER/DEED HOLDER(Attach list it more than one) • MAILING ADDRESS/CI I Y/S I A I EILIP CZ)CpC,C) S),"/ ; iiy,A Sc1 -c , �l(oA��, 972Z4 PHONE NU. FAX NU. ( 03-) Co 20 - Cc.000 So3-) - When the owner and the applicant are different people, the applicant must be the purchaser of record or a lessee in possession with written authorization from the owner or an agent of the owner. TheLorlNners must sign this application in the space provided on the back of this form or submit a written authorization with this application. PROPOSAL SUMMARY(Please be specific) Mob/Ft cfTio-J " -TO 161/4 Aeregove j Sa LLy°M -r. APPLICATIONS WILL NOT BE ACCEPTED WITHOUT ALL OF THE REQUIRED SUBMITTAL ELEMENTS AS DESCRIBED IN THE "BASIC SUBMITTAL REQUIREMENTS" INFORMATION SHEET. THE APPLICANT SHALL CERTIFY THAT: ♦ If the application is granted, the applicant shall exercise the rights granted in accordance with the terms and subject to all the conditions and limitations of the approval. ♦ All the above statements and the statements in the plot plan, attachments, and exhibits transmitted herewith, are true; and the applicants so acknowledge that any permit issued, based on this application, map be revoked if it is found that any such statements are false. ♦ The applicant has read the entire contents of the application, including the policies and criteria, and understands the requirements for approving or denying the application(s). SIGNATURES OF EACH OWNER OF THE SUBJECT PROPERTY ARE REQUIRED. y:47 . Owner's Signature Date ( 0(p Owner's Signature Date Owner's Signature Date Owner's Signature Date Owner's Signature Date elB/Zo acc:, Appli.ant/Agent/Representative's Signature Date Applicant/Agent/Representative's Signature Date CITY OF TIGARD 9/19/2006 1111 13125 SW Hall Blvd. 4:01:50PM Tigard,Oregon 97223 TIGARD (503)639-4171 Receipt #: 27200600000000004580 Date: 09/19/2006 Line Items: Case No Tran Code Description Revenue Account No Amount Paid SDR2006-00008 [LANDUS] SDR Under$1,000,000 100-0000-438000 3,759.00 SDR2006-00008 [LRPF] LR Planning Surcharge 100-0000-438050 555.00 Line Item Total: $4,314.00 Payments: Method Payer User ID Acct./Check No. Approval No. How Received Amount Paid Check MILDREN DESIGN GROUP,PC ST 5923 In Person 4,314.00 Payment Total: $4,314.00 cReceipt.rpt Page 1 of 1 III CITY OF TIGARD l 1/21/2006 �� 13125 SW Hall Blvd. 4:30:57PM Tigard,OR 97223 503.639.4171 TIGARD r Receipt #: 27200600000000005563 F Date: 11/21/2006 Line Items: Case No Tran Code Description Revenue Account No Amount Paid VAR2006-00086 [LANDUS]Special Adjust 100-0000-438000 262.50 VAR2006-00086 [LRPF]LR Planning Surcharge 100-0000-438050 38.50 Line Item Total: $301.00 Payments: Method Payer User ID Acct./Check No. Approval No. How Received Amount Paid Check MILDREN DESIGN GROUP P.C. ST 5937 In Person 301.00 Payment Total: $301.00 cReceipt.rpt Page 1 of 1 War r edit V e... APPLICANT'S STATEMENT FOR "MAJOR MODIFICATION" TO AN APPROVED SITE DEVELOPMENT July 10, 2006 Revised November 8, 2006 in Response to City"Incomplete Letter"dated October 16, 2006 Revised December 8,2006 in Response to City"Incomplete Letter dated December 7, 2006 APPLICANT: Paul Schatz 6600 SW Bonita Road Tigard, Oregon 97224 (503)620-6600 Fax: (503)639-0639 REPRESENTATIVES: Mildren Design Group Attention: Gene Mildren 7650 SW Beveland Street, Suite 120 Tigard, Oregon 97223 (503) 244-0552 Fax: (503)244-0417 T.M. Rippey Consulting Engineers Attention: Karl Koroch, P.E., Civil Engineer/Lans Stout, Planner 7650 SW Beveland Street, Suite 100 Tigard, Oregon 97223 (503) 443-3900 Fax: (503)443-3700 Applicant's Statement for ". for Modification" July 10, 2006 Revised November 8, 2006 Revised December 8, 2006 Page 2 ADDENDUM - DECEMBER 8, 2006 The following is added to address points requested in the City of Tigard letter dated Dec. 7, 2006, and to present a revision to the previously submitted Arborist Report and Tree Plan. Letter points: "Section 18.360.090.A.10 — please provide facts as to why there are no windows in certain areas." Comment: Windows are provided in the storefront areas. The parts of the building that are used primarily for storage have no windows for security reasons. "Section 18.530.040—no information was found on the cover sheet..." Comment: The site analysis data block was inadvertently left off, although some of the information was provided on the site plan. A complete data block indicating the code standards and provided improvements is now on the Cover Sheet as intended. "... bicycle parking..." Comment: bicycle parking is shown on the site plan and referenced in the data block. Additional issue raised by voicemail from City staff: Lighting comment: The original narrative referenced a lighting plan, but subsequently the decision was made to indicate lighting on the site plan and the narrative was not updated. The site plan shows all existing, relocated, and new lighting. Fixtures are located and designed with cutoffs to prevent off-site light spillage. Revision to Arborist Report and Tree Plan: The documents submitted to date have provided for the retention of a 39.5 inch fir tree on the south property line, labeled as tree 23. Further investigation has indicated that this tree's actual location and the required work in the area will make its safe retention problematic. Therefore, the plans and report are revised to indicate its removal. The Tree Report includes an analysis of required mitigation, and recommends payment of the fee in lieu of on-site mitigation due to site constraints and existing vegetation. ADDENDUM - OCTOBER 30, 2006 The following addendum is added to address points requested in the City of Tigard letter dated Oct. 16, 2006. 18.360.080.D Exceptions to landscaping requirements Comment: This section states that "The director shall grant an exception to the landscaping requirements of this code, Section 18.120.150, upon finding that the overall landscape plan provides for at least 20 of the gross site to be landscaped." Notwithstanding that Applicant's Statement for ". for Modification" July 10, 2006 Revised November 8, 2006 Revised December 8, 2006 Page 3 the word "percent" is missing from this section, it is presumed that if the Director reviews the landscape plan submitted with the documents for this application it will be found that the plan provides between 20% and 25% of the site to be landscaped, and the exception will be granted. It should be noted that the original narrative erroneously stated that the minimum landscaped area is 15%. 18.360.090.A.2. Relationship to the natural and physical environment. Comment: While this section is intended to be applied to new development, it was briefly addressed in the original narrative that follows. Since this is a building addition, and it is positioned in response to the existing development and to protect existing trees as much as possible, the intent of this section is met. 18.360.090.A.4(b) On site screening... Comment: This section was briefly addressed in the original narrative. A review of the plans submitted with this application will indicate that there are no new storage, service areas or visible mechanical units associated with this project. The revisions to the parking area are compliant with the standards of the parking section of the Code. No additional screening is required. 18.360. 090.10 Crime prevention and safety Comment: This section was addressed in the original narrative. A review of the plans submitted with this application will indicate that there are no "Interior laundry and service areas", nor exterior mailboxes. Similarly, the lighting plan indicates illumination for the parking lot consistent with conventional standards. 18.530.030 Uses Comment: The existing use has been approved as "Bulk Sales" in the IP zone east of 72nd Ave. The proposed addition will accommodate ancillary retail sales, which as indicated by the accompanying site plan will total approximately 12% of the total building area. This is less than the 20% maximum allowed by this section of the Code. 18.530.040 Development standards Comment: The development data summary normally included with an application was omitted from this original submittal. It is now shown on the cover sheet of the documents accompanying this submittal. 18.530.050.B Reduction in lot coverage requirements Comment: This section provides that lot coverage may be increased from 75% to 80% under certain conditions. The Code defines "lot coverage" as "The percent of a lot area covered by the horizontal projection of any structures or buildings". It is clear that as long as any parking is provided it would not be possible to meet the landscape requirement at 20% and at the same time exceed the coverage requirement. Since the accompanying plans provide over 20% Applicant's Statement for "I. nor Modification" July 10, 2006 Revised November 8, 2006 Revised December 8, 2006 Page 4 landscaping and Code compliant parking it is evident that the coverage maximum is not approached. 18.705.030.F Required walkway location Comment: The site plan submitted with the original application shows a walkway connecting the building entry to the public street as required. 18.745.030 General Provisions (landscaping) Comment: This section provides general guidance for the installation and maintenance of landscaping, which is applicable in the long term but not necessary for the purposes of an application. 18.745.040 Street Trees Comment: This site does have over 100 feet of street frontage, which is the threshold for installation of street trees. However, the street in question is the Bonita Road frontage within ODOT right of way, as it connects to the freeway overpass. Widening of the street frontage, and therefore installation of street trees has been discussed but is not resolved at the time of application. The issue is the cost associated with fill and/or retaining walls necessary for the widening, and whether that degree of cost burden is commensurate with this particular application. If it is determined that the widening will be done, street trees will be included. 18.765.030 ,050, and 060 Off-Street Parking Comment: As noted above, the data block normally provided with drawings to demonstrate compliance with the parking count requirements was previously omitted. This has been added, along with the required bike parking and dimensions within the parking area. The basis for the parking count was included in the previous narrative, in the discussion of the requirement for a "major" revision to an approved plan. It will be noted that the floor area to be added to the building has increased slightly since the original narrative, and the updated areas as well as parking count are reflected in the new data block. A review of this information will confirm that the Code standards are met by the design. It should be noted that no compact spaces are included. 18.810 Street Improvement Standards Comment: This section requires that street improvements be made in conjunction with site development. In this case, the site frontage on Bonita Road is designated as a Collector with a 96 foot right of way. The existing right of way, at approximately 190 feet, is adequate and the existing curb line is appropriate. However, the existing sidewalk is a 6-foot wide temporary asphalt sidewalk which does not meet standards. Therefore, it will be replaced with a permanent 6-foot wide concrete sidewalk consistent with the Collector standard cited in Table 18.810.1 of the Code. Applicant's Statement for ". or Modification" July 10, 2006 Revised November 8, 2006 Revised December 8, 2006 Page 5 A 5-foot planter strip is also required. However, Section 18.810.070 allows this standard to be deleted if there are steep slopes or other conditions which make it impractical to implement. In this case, Bonita Road is elevated on a significant fill, which makes any widening impractical. Consequently this application proposes to delete the planter strip and instead to install street trees on the slope behind the sidewalk and existing guard rail, which allows the new sidewalk to be installed at the curbline consistent with the location of the existing temporary walk. Additional comments with respect to the Access Adjustment: The original narrative, as follows, describes a request for an adjustment to the access requirements for a parking lot of over 100 spaces. It should be noted that the floor area of the proposed addition has slightly increased since the original application, and consequently the minimum and maximum number of spaces allowed by Code has also changed. The current numbers are indicated on the cover sheet of the accompanying revised documents. A further point of clarification relates to the actual width of the access. While the driveway is approximately 37 feet in width, it fronts a north-south portion of a public right of way that includes the developed portion of Bonita Road. Therefore, the site has significantly more actual frontage than the required 50 feet, but the area conditions limit actual access to the narrow north- south portion of the frontage. THE ORIGINAL SUBMITTAL NARRATIVE FOLLOWS: DESCRIPTION OF THE PROPOSAL: This is an application for a major revision to development plans previously approved by the City of Tigard. The scope of work includes additional parking and a new driveway to improve on-site circulation, and a building addition. There will also be upgraded landscaping along the street frontage and in the parking area to meet current code standards, and upgrades to the building elevations. Other work, such as interior improvements, is not subject to Site Development Review. This application does not qualify as a "minor revision" because the new parking area reduces on- site landscaping by over 10% of the existing area, and the building addition requires additional parking. Applicant's Statement for '_ or Modification" July 10, 2006 Revised November 8, 2006 Revised December 8, 2006 Page 6 This application also includes an adjustment to allow over 100 parking spaces with a single access. MODIFICATION CRITERIA: Section 18.360.050 lists criteria which establish whether a proposal is to be reviewed as a major or minor modification. Each is addressed as follows: "1. An increase in dwelling unit density, or lot coverage for residential development;" Comment: This criterion does not apply since the project is non-residential. "2. A change in the ratio or number of different types of dwelling units;" Comment: This criterion does not apply since the project is non-residential. "3. A change that requires additional on-site parking in accordance with Chapter 18.765;" Comment: The Code specifies that off street parking for furniture sales ("bulk sales") is provided at a minimum rate of 1 per 1,000 square foot of floor area, and a maximum of 2 per 1,000. The existing building, at 39,745 square feet and in "bulk sales" use, requires between 40 and 80 spaces. The proposed 4,585 square foot addition will be used for general retail sales of complementary items in support of the furniture sales, and is therefore classified as "Sales-Oriented" retail with a minimum of 3.7 per 1,000 and a maximum of 6.2 per 1,000. This component therefore requires between 17 and 29 spaces. The total parking for the site is 52 minimum, and 109 maximum, while the existing count is 64. The proposed plan provides 108 spaces. "4. A change in the type of commercial or industrial structures as defined by the Uniform Building Code;" Comment: Since this application will remodel and expand retail space, the building type is not affected. "5. An increase in the height of the building(s)by more than 20%;" Comment: The existing building height will not be exceeded by the addition. "6. A change in the type and location of accessways and parking areas where off-site traffic would be affected;" Applicant's Statement for ". or Modification" July 10, 2006 Revised November 8, 2006 Revised December 8, 2006 Page 7 Comment: This application does not propose any change to the type and location of access. However, an adjustment is addressed below with respect to the number and size of accesses. "7. An increase in vehicular traffic to and from the site and the increase can be expected to exceed 100 vehicles per day;" Comment: A trip generation analysis has not been accomplished for this project, since other criteria require a Major Modification. "8. An increase in the floor area proposed for a nonresidential use by more than 10% excluding expansions under 5,000 square feet;" Comment: The proposed addition is 4,585 square feet. "9. A reduction in the area reserved for common open space and/or usable open space which reduces the open space area below the minimum required by this code or reduces the open space area by more than 10%;" Comment: The IP zone does not require "common open space", so this criterion does not apply. "10. A reduction of project amenities below the minimum established by this code or by more than 10% where specified in the site plan: a. Recreational facilities; b. Screening; and/or c. Landscaping provisions." Comment: The existing development provides 47,475 square feet of landscaping (37.3%). The building and parking revisions will reduce this to 28,698 square feet (22.5%). This exceeds the IP zone minimum, but is more than the 10% allowed as a "minor" revision. "11. A modification to the conditions imposed at the time of site development review approval which are not the subject of B1 through 10 above of this subsection;" Comment: No modification to the original conditions of approval is proposed. Applicant's Statement for ". or Modification" July 10, 2006 Revised November 8, 2006 Revised December 8, 2006 Page 8 SITE DEVELOPMENT REVIEW CRITERIA: Section 18.360.070 lists submittal requirements for a Type II Application as follows: "1. Site Existing Condition Analysis." Comment: An overall site survey and plan indicating the existing conditions on the site is included. "2. A Site Plan." Comment: A detailed site plan is included. "3. A Grading Plan." Comment: A grading plan for the area of work is included. "4. A Landscape Plan." Comment: A landscape plan for the area of work is included. "5. Architectural elevations..." Comment: Architectural floor plans and elevations are included. "6. A copy of all existing and proposed restrictions or covenants;" Comment: No restrictions or covenants currently are in force, and none are proposed. Section 18.360.090 (A) provides approval criteria for Site Development Review application. Each is addressed as follows: "1. Compliance with this Title..." Comment: The various sections of the Code that apply to this application are individually addressed in this narrative. "2. Relationship to Environment..." A. Building Location. Applicant's Statement for "i. ,or Modification" July 10, 2006 Revised November 8, 2006 Revised December 8, 2006 Page 9 Comment: The new addition will be on the north side of the existing building. The positioning is critical to visibility from the site entrance, and for identity. "3. Exterior Elevations..." Comment: This criterion applies to multi-family developments; therefore this standard does not apply. "4. Adjoining Uses." Comment: The area of work abuts existing commercial uses. Consequently, buffering between uses is not an issue. 5, 6, & 7. All apply to multi-family development, and are not applicable to this project. "8. Floodplain." Comment: Floodplain development is not proposed, so this standard does not apply. "9. Demarcation of Space." Comment: The design provides for changes in the texture of paving — from asphalt street and parking areas to paved concrete sidewalks and walkways — and elevation changes to indicate different types of areas. Parking areas are bordered with landscaping to define separate areas. The standards have been met. "10. Crime Prevention." Comment: The proposed parking and access revisions will specifically avoid the creation of isolated areas in parking areas and adjacent the buildings, and will improve security by providing open access around the existing building. Also, lighting is provided to facilitate views into and from the site. "11. Public Transit." Comment: There is no public transit immediately adjacent this site. Applicant's Statement for "i. ,or Modification" July 10, 2006 Revised November 8, 2006 Revised December 8, 2006 Page 10 "12. Landscaping." Comment: This section requires that 15% of the gross site, including 20% of parking and loading areas to be landscaped. Data provided on the accompanying drawings shows that this standard is met. "13. Drainage." Comment: The existing site development precedes current standards for stormwater detention and quality. The accompanying utility plan indicates the provision of stormwater detention and treatment for the new impervious area. "14. Provisions for Disabled." Comment: The site plan indicates handicapped parking stalls and ADA compliant access. "15. Underlying Zone." Comment: This site is zoned IP. Since the area of work abuts IP zoned property, there are no setback requirements and the only applicable standards are the 45 foot maximum height, and 15% landscaped area which are met by the revised plan. ADJUSTMENT TO VEHICULAR ACCESS REQUIREMENTS: Section 18.705 of the Code, in Table 18,705.3, requires a commercial parking area with over 100 spaces to have one 40 foot wide driveway in an access of 50 feet wide, or two of 24 feet in width in a 30 foot wide access. This proposed adjustment is to allow for existing parking area, as expanded to 108 spaces, to continue to be served by the existing single access point. The access width is 37 feet, with a curb-to-curb width of 30 feet. It should be noted that a second parcel also uses this existing access by way of an easement, but that property is not included in the current application. Approval criteria for Adjustments Access and Egress Standards are specified by Section 18.370.020(c)(5)(b). Each is addressed as follows: Applicant's Statement for "i or Modification" July 10, 2006 Revised November 8, 2006 Revised December 8, 2006 Page 11 1. "It is not possible to share access." Comment: The existing access is the only location that is physically possible to serve the site due to I-5 on the east, Bonita Road on the north, the Home Depot on the south, and other existing development on the west. While the access is "shared" with the abutting property to the west, this does not alleviate the physical constraints on the site, and no additional shared access opportunity exists. 2. "There are no other alternative access points..." Comment: As noted above, the site is constrained by development on all sides. There are no other street frontages that can provide additional access. 3. "The access separation requirements cannot be met." Comment: Access separation is not an issue on this adjustment, so this criterion does not apply. 4. "The request is the minimum..." Comment: This adjustment is based on the existing site conditions. It is not possible to increase the access width from 37 feet to 50 feet, because the parcel's street frontage is limited to the 37 foot dimension. It is also not possible to increase the curb-to-curb width from 30 feet to 40 feet because of existing parking and landscaping, and the additional width is not needed to provide adequate lane width. 5. "The approved access, or access approved with conditions, will result in a safe access." Comment: The Code assumes that for any number of parking spaces over 100 a single driveway with a 40 foot paved width will be "safe", based on the standards of Table 18.705.3. Similarly it assumes that for 99 spaces, a single driveway with a 30 foot width would be safe. Since the proposed parking area to be served by the existing 30 foot driveway is only 108 spaces, it follows that exceeding the number of spaces by only 9 is inconsequential. Further, the existing driveway has operated for many years with no known safety issues. Applicant's Statement for ". or Modification" July 10, 2006 Revised November 8, 2006 Revised December 8, 2006 Page 12 6. "The visual clearance requirements of Chapter 18.795 will be met." Comment: The vision clearance standards can be met. This is required notwithstanding approval of the proposed adjustment. IMPACT STUDY: Section 18.390.040(B)(2)(e) requires that Type II Applications include an impact study. Since this project includes a small building addition and an expanded parking area, potential impacts relate to traffic, public water supply, and sanitary/stormwater systems. The potential traffic impact due to the project is small and will be accommodated by Traffic Impact Fees. Similarly, the impact to water supply and sanitary/stormwater systems is also very small and will be accommodated by on-site facilities and payment of impact fees. The applicant concurs with conditions of approval which relate to these impacts. A r b o r i'5± Report" John O'Shea, Consulting Arborist ISA Certified Arborist #WE1877 433 SE 70th Avenue Portland OR 97215 (503) 408-9308 I e: banjoist@qwest.net www.im4trees.com Paul Schatz 6600 SW Bonita Rd. Tigard,OR 97233 December 7,2006 Arborist Report: Driveway and miscellaneous improvements SCOPE The purpose of this report is to inventory and to provide a professional opinion of the health of the trees on the property at 6600 SW Bonita Road,Tigard. This report is to ensure compliance with the City of Tigard Code with respect to the impact of proposed site development, and is specifically required by Chapter 18.790 of the Development Code. In addition to a condition survey, this report will determine mitigation requirements under the Code and will address preservation standards and ongoing activities required during construction. OBSERVATIONS There are small trees and shrubbery on the site that do not meet the Code definition of"tree". A topographic survey provided by the owner is the basis for the tree survey. It indicates species, diameter and tree identification numbers for each tree as defined by the Code. The initial investigation began by measuring the trees of more than 6 inches (6") in diameter and checking them for wounds or flaws. Trees were measured at 48", the standard caliper height by Code. Multi-stemmed trees that branched below 4 feet are noted accordingly. The site development that will affect some trees includes an expanded parking area, a driveway around the building, and a small building addition. Arborist Report: Schatz,Tigard page 2 Following are general observations with respect to the inventoried trees: #1: Blue spruce,24",with a double top, girdling root, and heaving. This tree is a hazard due to its likelihood to fail and its proximity to parking areas now and in the future. This is the only true hazard tree found on this property. #2: Leland cypress, 5.7",moderate,healthy. Trees of this size are marked on the map,but not included in the inventory except for reference. Only trees over six inches diameter (at 4-foot above grade) are included. #3: Leland cypress, 6", moderate,healthy. #4: Red maple,5.9", moderate. This is actually on a neighboring property,but will be protected during construction. #5: Norway maple, 11.5",moderate,exposed roots. #6: Norway maple, 13.5", low. Poor soil, leaning. #7: Norway maple, 6.5", Hazard, leaning east. #8: Garry oak, 6.5",moderate,poor soil. #9: Norway maple,6.5", low. #10: Norway maple,6.5", low. #11: Norway maple, double-top,moderate. #12: Norway maple. 6", moderate. Leans slightly southwest. #13: Horse chestnut, 10.5" Moderate #14: Norway maple, 16",high. #15: Norway maple, 15",moderate #16: Cherry,9.5", moderate. #17: Serviceberry,9.5", low. #18: Norway maple, 8",moderate. #19: Hawthorne, 7.5", moderate. John O'Shea, Consulting Arborist Arborist Report: _ Schatz, Tigard page 3 #20: Hawthorne, 6.5". #21: Cherry, 13",moderate. #22: Hawthorne, 10.5",moderate. #23: Douglas-fir,39.5", moderate. Off-site Douglas-fir, approximately 35" DBH. Although this tree is on a neighboring property, and is approximately fourteen feet from excavation for the driveway, it will be protected with fencing and an aeration system. #24:Japanese 3-needle pine, double-stem,previously pruned formally. #25:Japanese 3-needle pine, double stem. #26:Japanese 3-needle pine, 12.5". #27:Japanese 3-needle pine. Three stems. One had been topped. #28:Japanese lace-leaf maple, 7.5". Needs pruning. John O'Shea, Consulting Arborist • , Arborist F, , ,rt: Paul Schatz,Tigard page 4 TREE INVENTORY ID# Common names Species DBH in inches Over 12-inches Preservation Recommendation caliper? Value 1 Blue spruce Picea pungens glauca 24" Yes Hazard Remove 2 Leland cypress Cupressocyparis 5.7" No Moderate Remove leylandii 3 Leland cypress Cupressocyparis 6" No Moderate Remove leylandii 4 Red maple Acer rubrum 6" No Moderate Preserve 5 Norway maple Acer platanoides 11.5" Yes Moderate Preserve 6 Norway maple Acer platanoides 13.5" Yes Low Preserve 7 Norway maple Acer platanoides 6.5" No Hazard Remove 8 Garry oak Quercus garryana 6.5" No Moderate Remove 9 Norway maple Acer platanoides 6.5" No Low Remove 10 Norway maple Acer platanoides 6.5" No Low Remove 11 Norway maple Acer platanoides 10"and 7.5" No Moderate Remove (double-top) at 48" 12 Norway maple Acer platanoides 6" No Moderate Remove 13 Horse chestnut Aeschylus 10.5" No Moderate Preserve hippocastrum 14 Norway maple Acer platanoides 16" Yes High Preserve 15 Horse chestnut Aeschylus 15" Yes Moderate Preserve hippocastrum 16 Cherry Prunus sp. 9.5" No Moderate Preserve 17 Serviceberrry Amalancher 9.5" No Low Remove 18 Norway maple Acer platanoides 8" No Moderate Remove 19 Hawthorne Crataegus sp. 7.5" No Moderate Remove 20 Hawthorne Crataegus sp. 6.5" No Low Remove 21 Cherry Prunus sp. 13" Yes Moderate Remove 22 Hawthorne Crataegus sp. 10.5" No Moderate Remove 23 Douglas-fir Pseudotsuga menziesii 39.5" Yes Moderate Remove 24 Japanese pine Pinus sp. 8"and 8"at Yes Moderate Preserve (2-stem) 48" 25 Japanese pine Pinus sp. 10"and 7"at Yes Moderate Preserve (2-stem) 48" 26 Japanese pine Pinus sp 11.5" Yes Moderate Preserve 27 Japanese pine Pinus sp 6",5",and 4" No Hazard/ Remove (3-stem) at 48" infested 28 Japanese maple Acer circinatum sp. 7.5" No High Remove John O'Shea, Consulting Arborist Arborist Report: Schatz, Tigard page 5 (1)DBH=Diameter at breast height(4.5 ft.above the surface grade) (2)Significant status (3)Preservation Value Explanation: Hazard=Dead,dying,or dangerous tree that should not be retained. Low=Poor specimen.Some caution if retained. Moderate=Common species with minimal character.Can be retained. High=Good character trees,save if possible. Special=Unique species,specimen or form.Save if possible. TREE MITIGATION UNDER TIGARD CODE Total number of trees on-site more than 12-inch caliper: 6 Hazard trees: 1 Net number of trees more than 12-inch caliper: 5 Trees to be retained: 3 Removal of 2 out of 5 trees is 60% retention,which requires mitigation for 50%of the caliper inches of the trees removed,based on Code section 18.790.060.D. Since the trees to be removed are 13 inches and 39.5 inches caliper,the total is 52.5 inches and therefore 26.25 inches of mitigation is required. On-site mitigation must be in excess of the otherwise required tree plantings,but in this case the existing development and landscaping does not provide opportunities for additional tree installation. Therefore,as allowed by subsection E, it is requested that the mitigation be accommodated through the payment of a fee in lieu of on-site planting. The fee is calculated based on 26.25 inches at$125 per inch, for a total of$3281.25. CONCLUSIONS/RECOMMENDATIONS The paragraphs in bold below will be transferred to the tree protection drawing to be used during construction and elevation. Tree Notes It will be necessary to put orange construction fence around each of the trees to be saved. For tree#15, the fences can be closer than is normally recommended, and joined to existing fences as drawn on map. This fencing should all be four feet high, five to fifteen feet from the trees and joined to the existing fences where possible. It will be attached to steel posts driven into the ground at least every five feet. Inside of the tree protection John O'Shea, Consulting Arborist Arborist Report: F Schatz,Tigard page 6 zone there should be no stacking, storage, or handling of materials, nor any driving, loading or parking of construction vehicles. Personnel will be notified, either on blueprint notes or verbally, that no one is allowed in this area except with the cooperation and permission of the project arborist. During construction or excavation, any root of more than 1.5 inches that is encountered from a preserved tree shall be immediately reported to the project arborist. Watering of all preserved trees shall be done twice a month except on weeks where precipitation exceeds 0.3". Watering with a sprinkler (for ten minutes) or soaker (for one hour each event) is recommended, although water bags or a truck system is allowed. The project arborist reserves the right to demand changes in this water frequency or duration if tree health is threatened. A coarse landscape bark mulch should be used to retain water around the bases of all the preserved trees extending at least five feet from each of the trees. All pines to be preserved need to be deep-fertilized,pruned, and also watered regularly if they are to survive in these areas. They are currently stressed,but in my opinion can be saved. See attachment 'A' detailing aeration systems for the adjacent off-site tree. The depth of the gravel,in my opinion, can be suited by the engineer to the site. The importance for the tree is to get air (gas exchange) to the roots so that it will continue to thrive. In my opinion,if these recommendations are carried out,construction will not damage the trees to be preserved. E .,,,„ LI John O'Shea Consulting Arborist ISA Certified Arborist#WE1877 Mobile# 503-860-3055 John O'Shea, Consulting Arborist Co ri vej &vi ce Water Qual; feJ&is RECEIV. $ Nov 2 1 200E Paul Schatz (;ITV fl T1rARD STORMWATER CALCULATIONS Tigard, OR November 17, 2006 PROJECT NUMBER: 5273 S F w� 15504 4.4 Oy -- , G,! TM RIPPEY :G(y 25 ,�, CONSULTING ENGINEERS SAC Ko O ' 7650 SW Beveland Street, Suite 100 I EXPIRES:8/30/01 I Tigard,Oregon 97223 Phone: (503)443-3900 Fax: (503)443-3700 Email:kkoroch@trnrippey.com i. Paul Schatz STORMWATER CALCULATIONS Tigard, OR November 17, 2006 PROJECT NUMBER: 5273 1,....-vi.i\_ TM RIPPEY CONSULTING ENGINEERS 7650 SW Beveland Street, Suite 100 Tigard,Oregon 97223 Phone: (503)443-3900 Fax: (503)443-3700 Email:kkoroch@trnrippey.com 1.0 PROJECT OVERVIEW Paul Schatz Furniture is remodeling a portion of the existing building and building a 4,600 ft2 addition. The building addition will be used for furniture retail sales. Storm design conforms to Clean Water Services standards. The site is 127,123 ft2(2.92 ac). There is 75,872 ft2(1.74 ac)of existing impervious area.Newly created impervious area will be 20,295 ft2(0.47 ac)with 1,426 ft2(0.033 ac)of new landscape area. This results in a 18,869 ft2(0.43 ac)net increase of impervious area for a total of 94,741 ft2(2.17 ac)impervious area. Site runoff discharges to an existing public system east of SW Sequoia and Bonita. New site water quality treatment is sized to treat the entire site. Detention facilities are sized to treat the new impervious area only. Site runoff will continue to discharge into the existing public storm sewer system,no new connection is proposed. Because site detention used to model existing conditions,no analysis of downstream pipe capacity is necessary. The rational method with n=0.012 was used for conveyance calculation with a rainfall intensity of 3.4 in/hr. 2.0 WATER QUALITY Water Quality Volume(cubic feet) WQV=0.36(in.)X Impervious Area(sf)/ 12(in/ft) Impervious Area=94,741 sf WQV=0.36in X 94,741 sf/ 12(in/ft) WQV=2,842 cf Water Quality Flow(cfs) WQF— WQV/ 14,400(sec) WQF= 2,842 cf/ 14,400 sec WQF=0.20 cfs At 0.0334 cfs per cartridge,a vault with six cartridges is required. 2.0 DETENTION Only newly created impervious area is detained. Detention volume and outlet sizing was calculated using the SBUH method model with HydroCAD v7.1. Detention consists of a 36"pipe. The outflow control structure has the following orifices: 2 year 1.3"at 165.50' 10 year 1.8"at 167.45' 25 year 12"overflow at 168.60' See attached HydroCAD sheets for calculations. 0 Existing 0 Z NewImpervious /3 :1 Detention Pond �\-- Subcat Reach 'on• Link Drainage Diagram for 5273_Paul Schatz Furniture ----\____ Prepared by Shawn Dowie 11/17/2006 HydroCAD®7.10 s/n 002239 ©2005 HydroCAD Software Solutions LLC 5273_Paul Schatz Furniture Type IA 24-hr 2 yr Rainfall=2.50" Prepared by Shawn Dowie Page 2 HydroCAD®7.10 s/n 002239 ©2005 HydroCAD Software Solutions LLC 11/17/2006 Time span=0.00-24.00 hrs, dt=0.02 hrs, 1201 points Runoff by SBUH method Reach routing by Stor-Ind+Trans method - Pond routing by Stor-Ind method Subcatchment 1 S: New Impervious Runoff Area=18,869 sf Runoff Depth>2.27" Tc=5.0 min CN=98 Runoff=0.25 cfs 0.082 of Subcatchment 2S: Existing Runoff Area=18,629 sf Runoff Depth>0.74" Tc=5.0 min CN=77 Runoff=0.06 cfs 0.026 of Pond 3P: Detention Pond Peak Elev=167.43' Storage=807 cf Inflow=0.25 cfs 0.082 of Outflow=0.06 cfs 0.080 af Total Runoff Area =0.861 ac Runoff Volume=0.108 af Average Runoff Depth = 1.51" 5273_Paul Schatz Furniture Type IA 24-hr 2 yr Rainfall=2.50" Prepared by Shawn Dowie Page 3 HydroCAD®7.10 s/n 002239 ©2005 HydroCAD Software Solutions LLC 11/17/2006 Subcatchment 1S: New Impervious Runoff = 0.25 cfs @ 7.89 hrs, Volume= 0.082 af, Depth> 2.27" Runoff by SBUH method, Time Span= 0.00-24.00 hrs, dt= 0.02 hrs Type IA 24-hr 2 yr Rainfall=2.50" Area (sf) CN Description 18,869 98 Paved parking & roofs Tc Length Slope Velocity Capacity Description (min) (feet) (ft/ft) (ft/sec) (cfs) 5.0 Direct Entry, Subcatchment 1S: New Impervious Hydrograph ❑Runoff 0.26- o 25 a5 0.24- Type IA 24-hr 2 yr 0.22 od Rainfall=2.50" 0.2- � Runoff Area=18,869 sf 0.18' „ 0.16 i� Runoff Volume=0.082 af 0.14 Runoff Depth>2.27" o LL 0.12= (/1 TC=5.0 min 0.1 CN=98 0.08- 0.06 4 0.04- / `®aI//!//I///O///////////////////////////// 0.02= j/j 0 %// 0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 Time (hours) 5273_Paul Schatz Furniture Type IA 24-hr 2 yr Rainfall=2.50" Prepared by Shawn Dowie Page 4 HydroCAD®7.10 s/n 002239 ©2005 HydroCAD Software Solutions LLC 11/17/2006 Subcatchment 2S: Existing Runoff = 0.06 cfs @ 8.00 hrs, Volume= 0.026 af, Depth> 0.74" Runoff by SBUH method, Time Span= 0.00-24.00 hrs, dt= 0.02 hrs Type IA 24-hr 2 yr Rainfall=2.50" Area (sf) CN Description 18,629 77 Brush, Poor, HSG C Tc Length Slope Velocity Capacity Description (min) (feet) (ft/ft) (ft/sec) (cfs) 5.0 Direct Entry, Subcatchment 2S: Existing Hydrograph 0.06- [o Runoff cfs 0.055- V .. .. Type IA 24-Fir 2 yr 0.05- • 0 RainfaII2.60" 0.045 0 Runoff Area=18,629 sf 0.04 _ _Runoff_Volume-0..O26 af 0.035: Rufloff De#pthO.7.4. 0 0.031 �j� a 1 0...'T an. 0.025: / { i O\1;�77 0.02= t� 0.015 0.01 0.005= 0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18'-'119- 6 21 22 23 24 Time (hours) 5273_Paul Schatz Furniture Type IA 24-hr 2 yr Rainfall=2.50" Prepared by Shawn Dowie Page 5 HydroCAD®7.10 s/n 002239 ©2005 HydroCAD Software Solutions LLC 11/17/2006 Pond 3P: Detention Pond Inflow Area = 0.433 ac, Inflow Depth > 2.27" for 2 yr event Inflow = 0.25 cfs @ 7.89 hrs, Volume= 0.082 of Outflow = 0.06 cfs @ 9.44 hrs, Volume= 0.080 af, Atten= 75%, Lag= 93.0 min Primary = 0.06 cfs @ 9.44 hrs, Volume= 0.080 of Routing by Stor-Ind method, Time Span= 0.00-24.00 hrs, dt= 0.02 hrs Peak Elev= 167.43' @ 9.44 hrs Surf.Area= 524 sf Storage= 807 cf Plug-Flow detention time= 138.6 min calculated for 0.080 af(98% of inflow) Center-of-Mass det. time 121.9 min ( 793.5 - 671.6 ) Volume Invert Avail.Storage Storage Description #1 165.60' 1,265 cf 36.0"D x 179.00'L Horizontal Cylinder Device Routing Invert Outlet Devices #1 Primary 165.50' 1.3" Horiz. Orifice/Grate Limited to weir flow C= 0.600 #2 Primary 167.45' 1.8"Vert. Orifice/Grate C= 0.600 #3 Primary 168.60' 12.0" Horiz. Orifice/Grate -Overflow Limited to weir flow C= 0.600 Erimary OutFlow Max=0.06 cfs @ 9.44 hrs HW=167.43' (Free Discharge) -1=Orifice/Grate (Orifice Controls 0.06 cfs @ 6.7 fps) -2=Orifice/Grate ( Controls 0.00 cfs) -3=Orifice/Grate-Overflow ( Controls 0.00 cfs) Pond 3P: Detention Pond Hydrograph / ' L❑Inflow II 1 0.25 cfs ❑Primary 0.26; y" Inflow Area=0.433 ac 0.24_ x t.ii Peak Elev=167.43 0.22_ f 0.2 Storage=807 cf `,' 0.18; o.ts- 0.14 LL 0.12J 01, j 0.08 .( "'5i9,i 0.08 ds r 0.06- •�.�. ....�_. 0.04; /; 0.02_ 0 0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 Time (hours) 5273_Paul Schatz Furniture Type IA 24-hr 10 yr Rainfall=3.45" Prepared by Shawn Dowie Page 6 HydroCAD®7.10 s/n 002239 ©2005 HydroCAD Software Solutions LLC 11/17/2006 Time span=0.00-24.00 hrs, dt=0.02 hrs, 1201 points Runoff by SBUH method Reach routing by Stor-Ind+Trans method - Pond routing by Stor-Ind method Subcatchment 1S: New Impervious Runoff Area=18,869 sf Runoff Depth>3.21" Tc=5.0 min CN=98 Runoff=0.35 cfs 0.116 af Subcatchment 2S: Existing Runoff Area=18,629 sf Runoff Depth>1.39" Tc=5.0 min CN=77 Runoff=0.13 cfs 0.050 af Pond 3P: Detention Pond Peak Elev=168.04' Storage=1,104 cf Inflow=0.35 cfs 0.116 af Outflow=0.13 cfs 0.109 af Total Runoff Area = 0.861 ac Runoff Volume= 0.165 af Average Runoff Depth =2.31" 5273 Paul Schatz Furniture Type IA 24-hr 10 yr Rainfall=3.45" Prepared by Shawn Dowie Page 7 HydroCADO 7.10 s/n 002239 ©2005 HydroCAD Software Solutions LLC 11/17/2006 Subcatchment IS: New Impervious Runoff = 0.35 cfs @ 7.88 hrs, Volume= 0.116 af, Depth> 3.21" Runoff by SBUH method, Time Span= 0.00-24.00 hrs, dt= 0.02 hrs Type IA 24-hr 10 yr Rainfall=3.45" Area (sf) CN Description 18,869 98 Paved parking & roofs Tc Length Slope Velocity Capacity Description (min) (feet) (ft/ft) (ft/sec) (cfs) 5.0 Direct Entry, Subcatchment IS: New Impervious Hydrog ra ph ../ 0.38: 0 Runoff 036-, 035th 0.34- A Type IA 24-hr 10 yr Rainfall=3.45" : 1 10 0.28= Runoff Area=18,869 sf 0.24-,' 0704 Runoff Volume=0.116 af 22 a --a Runoff Depth>3.21" . - 0.2 ' 0.18= "! W Tc=5C0 Nm9in 0.16 V 014 = 8 - 0.124 VA' o.1 I Tie, 0.08 / ''d9.4 el P ZA P 0.02-: 0 0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 Time (hours) 5273_Paul Schatz Furniture Type IA 24-hr 10 yr Rainfall=3.45" Prepared by Shawn Dowie Page 8 HydroCAD®7.10 s/n 002239 ©2005 HydroCAD Software Solutions LLC 11/17/2006 Subcatchment 2S: Existing Runoff = 0.13 cfs @ 7.99 hrs, Volume= 0.050 af, Depth> 1.39" Runoff by SBUH method, Time Span= 0.00-24.00 hrs, dt= 0.02 hrs Type IA 24-hr 10 yr Rainfall=3.45" Area (sf) CN Description 18,629 77 Brush, Poor, HSG C Tc Length Slope Velocity Capacity Description (min) (feet) (ft/ft) (ft/sec) (cfs) 5.0 Direct Entry, Subcatchment 2S: Existing Hydrograph z 0.14, ❑ Runoff 0.13= 0.13 cfs 0.1 2- Type IA *4411710 yr 0.11- ; RatnfaIt 3.45" 0.1-; Runoff Area=18 629 sf 008; Runoff:uoIume Q.O5Q__af 3 0.07 Runoff Tc=5-4 -min 0.05;' N7 . 0.02 0.01- 0 , ///////////// ,,, ,� r T r . , 'i, .T,1,err, 0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 Time (hours) 5273_Paul Schatz Furniture Type IA 24-hr 10 yr Rainfall=3.45" Prepared by Shawn Dowie Page 9 HydroCAD®7.10 s/n 002239 ©2005 HydroCAD Software Solutions LLC 11/17/2006 Pond 3P: Detention Pond Inflow Area = 0.433 ac, Inflow Depth > 3.21" for 10 yr event Inflow = 0.35 cfs @ 7.88 hrs, Volume= 0.116 of Outflow = 0.13 cfs @ 8.63 hrs, Volume= 0.109 af, Atten= 62%, Lag=44.7 min Primary = 0.13 cfs @ 8.63 hrs, Volume= 0.109 af Routing by Stor-Ind method, Time Span= 0.00-24.00 hrs, dt= 0.02 hrs Peak Elev= 168.04' @ 8.63 hrs Surf.Area=417 sf Storage= 1,104 cf Plug-Flow detention time= 152.8 min calculated for 0.109 af(94% of inflow) Center-of-Mass det. time 109.2 min ( 771.4 - 662.2 ) Volume Invert Avail.Storage Storage Description #1 165.60' 1,265 cf 36.0"D x 179.00'L Horizontal Cylinder Device Routing Invert Outlet Devices #1 Primary 165.50' 1.3" Horiz. Orifice/Grate Limited to weir flow C= 0.600 #2 Primary 167.45' 1.8" Vert. Orifice/Grate C= 0.600 #3 Primary 168.60' 12.0" Horiz. Orifice/Grate -Overflow Limited to weir flow C= 0.600 Primary OutFlow Max=0.13 cfs @ 8.63 hrs HW=168.04' (Free Discharge) -1=Orifice/Grate (Orifice Controls 0.07 cfs @ 7.7 fps) -2=OrificelGrate (Orifice Controls 0.06 cfs @ 3.5 fps) -3=Orifice/Grate -Overflow ( Controls 0.00 cfs) Pond 3P: Detention Pond Hydrograph / . Ip m ry 0.38 I o3s cfs P 0. Inflow Area=0.433 ac 0.34 0.32- Peak Elev=168.04' 0.3 0.28_ s,, Storage=1,104 cf 0.26' 0.24-: ,, w 0.22= i 0.2= � �'* : r-. 0 0.18; . ILL - 0.16. j 0"13cfs .•% 0.14 . 0• fj�� 0.08 / /,! /�����w+f`%��ii�i�i�d'd%/!/l/,�����`������ir���/�5��������� 0.06 fv` � 0.04 " ,, i40/,/ - - 0.023 ' 0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 Time (hours) 5273_Paul Schatz Furniture Type IA 24-hr 25 yr Rainfall=3.90" Prepared by Shawn Dowie Page 10 HydroCAD®7.10 s/n 002239 ©2005 HydroCAD Software Solutions LLC 11/17/2006 Time span=0.00-24.00 hrs, dt=0.02 hrs, 1201 points Runoff by SBUH method Reach routing by Stor-Ind+Trans method - Pond routing by Stor-Ind method Subcatchment 1S: New Impervious Runoff Area=18,869 sf Runoff Depth>3.66" Tc=5.0 min CN=98 Runoff=0.40 cfs 0.132 of Subcatchment 2S: Existing Runoff Area=18,629 sf Runoff Depth>1.73" Tc=5.0 min CN=77 Runoff=0.17 cfs 0.062 of Pond 3P: Detention Pond Peak EIev=168.57' Storage=1,263 cf Inflow=0.40 cfs 0.132 af Outflow=0.16 cfs 0.123 af Total Runoff Area=0.861 ac Runoff Volume=0.194 af Average Runoff Depth =2.70" 5273_Paul Schatz Furniture Type IA 24-hr 25 yr Rainfall=3.90" Prepared by Shawn Dowie Page 11 HydroCAD®7.10 s/n 002239 ©2005 HydroCAD Software Solutions LLC 11/17/2006 Subcatchment 1 S: New Impervious Runoff = 0.40 cfs @ 7.88 hrs, Volume= 0.132 af, Depth> 3.66" Runoff by SBUH method, Time Span= 0.00-24.00 hrs, dt= 0.02 hrs Type IA 24-hr 25 yr Rainfall=3.90" Area (sf) CN Description 18,869 98 Paved parking & roofs Tc Length Slope Velocity Capacity Description (min) (feet) (ft/ft) (ft/sec) (cfs) 5.0 Direct Entry, Subcatchment 1 S: New Impervious Hydrograph 0.44 0.42=' ❑Runoff 0.40 cfs 0.4= Type 1A 24 hrs 25-yr / ----- 0.34= ._ R�atrrfaII=3.90" 0.32- � 03: �� Runoff Area=18,869 sf 0:20 %� Runoff Volume=0.132 af D.24= / Runoff Depth>166" 3 0.22- SI 18; Tc=5.0 min 016- / �I CN=98 0.12 00..08-; , 0.04_ / 0.02' 0 0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 Time (hours) • 5273 Paul Schatz Furniture Type IA 24-hr 25 yr Rainfall=3.90" Prepared by Shawn Dowie Page 12 HydroCAD®7.10 s/n 002239 ©2005 HydroCAD Software Solutions LLC 11/17/2006, Subcatchment 2S: Existing Runoff = 0.17 cfs @ 8.00 hrs, Volume= 0.062 af, Depth> 1.73" Runoff by SBUH method, Time Span= 0.00-24.00 hrs, dt= 0.02 hrs Type IA 24-hr 25 yr Rainfall=3.90" Area (sf) CN Description 18,629 77 Brush, Poor, HSG C Tc Length Slope Velocity Capacity Description (min) (feet) (ft/ft) (ft/sec) (cfs) 5.0 Direct Entry, Subcatchment 2S: Existing Hydrograph Runoff o.18= 0.17 0.17 cfs 0.16= � Type IA 24-hr 25 yr 0.15; PrA Rainfall=3.90" 014 " O� 013: Runoff Area.=18,629 sf. 0.12- 0.11; Runoff Volume=0.062 af 3 009 / Runoff Depth>1.73" LL o.08-4 Tc=5.0 min 0.07;" . 41 CN=77 0.06 0.05 o.04-' �� 01~ /mfr 0.03' //� 0.02= 0.00 0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 Time (hours) 5273_Paul Schatz Furniture Type IA 24-hr 25 yr Rainfall=3.90" Prepared by Shawn Dowie Page 13 HydroCAD®7.10 s/n 002239 ©2005 HydroCAD Software Solutions LLC 11/17/2006 Pond 3P: Detention Pond Inflow Area = 0.433 ac, Inflow Depth > 3.66" for 25 yr event Inflow = 0.40 cfs @ 7.88 hrs, Volume= 0.132 af Outflow = 0.16 cfs @ 8.42 hrs, Volume= 0.123 af, Atten= 59%, Lag= 32.2 min Primary = 0.16 cfs @ 8.42 hrs, Volume= 0.123 af Routing by Stor-lnd method, Time Span= 0.00-24.00 hrs, dt= 0.02 hrs Peak Elev= 168.57' @ 8.42 hrs Surf.Area= 109 sf Storage= 1,263 cf Plug-Flow detention time= 153.6 min calculated for 0.123 of(93% of inflow) Center-of-Mass det. time= 101.3 min ( 760.4 -659.1 ) Volume Invert Avail.Storage Storage Description #1 165.60' 1,265 cf 36.0"D x 179.00'L Horizontal Cylinder Device Routing Invert Outlet Devices #1 Primary 165.50' 1.3" Horiz. Orifice/Grate Limited to weir flow C= 0.600 #2 Primary 167.45' 1.8" Vert. Orifice/Grate C= 0.600 #3 Primary 168.60' 12.0" Horiz. Orifice/Grate -Overflow Limited to weir flow C= 0.600 Primary OutFlow Max=0.16 cfs @ 8.42 hrs HW=168.57' (Free Discharge) -1=Orifice/Grate (Orifice Controls 0.08 cfs @ 8.4 fps) -2=Orifice/Grate (Orifice Controls 0.09 cfs @ 4.9 fps) -3=Orifice/Grate- Overflow ( Controls 0.00 cfs) Pond 3P: Detention Pond Hydrograph 0.44/ Inflow I oao c�I U Primary °.42= Inflow. Area=0.433 ac 0.4' 0.38= 0.36_ Peak Elev=168.57' 0.34= e' 0.32_ Storage=1 ,263 cf 0.3 0.28= 7. 0.26= . 0.24 0.22: ° 0 2 0.18.i 016 cfs . 0.164 0.14- 0.12' f 0.1- / dfor 'b 0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 Time (hours) 7650 SW Beveland St,Suite 100 11\/11 _ TM Rip p ey Tigard,Oregon 97223 CONSULTING ENGINEERS Phone:(503)443-3900 Fax:(503)443-3700 STORM SEWER DESIGN FORM: Unit Conversion(acre/ft2) 2.30E-05 PROJECT NUMBER: 5273 Runoff Coefficient 0.9 DESIGNED BY: SAD PROJECT NAME: Paul Schatz Rainfall Intensity(in/hr): 3.4 CHECKED BY: KJK DATE: 11/17/2006 Manning's Coefficient(n)= 0.012 DESIGN DRAINAGE BASIN Equiv.Area CUMULATIVE UPPER LOWER PIPE PIPE INVERT DESIGN FULL FLOW VELOC. AREA PIPE# AREA for 100% DRAINAGE INVERT INVERT LENGTH SIZE SLOPE DISCHARGE CAPACITY @ Q/Qf ft2 acres Runoff AREA L V (C)(A) acres in ft/ft cfs cfs A 1 3481 0.0799 0.072 0.0719 167.35 158.97 94 6 0.089 0.22 1.8 8.32 B 2 7434 0.1707 0.154 0.1536 166.40 165.60 80 6 0.010 0.47 0.6 1.30 C 3 31450 0.7220 0.650 0.6498 163.20 162.95 8 12 0.033 1.99 7.1 3.58 4 38884 0.8927 0.803 0.8034 162.95 162.69 8 12 0.032 2.46 7.0 2.86 Page 1 of 1 4. a I 3 C,O. 1J U I CONNECT TO EXIST NH I ‘1...2_.„) IE; 16290(12•SE) —� it ---___ 4 6 SD_6,2.6% I _ J —, —__ \ mo\ -- � ' , 1 E-• NI 60'319QM CON=R s. MH _ _. --‘Alk. RIM-173.5fT(I/i CH F I I IE: 167.10 .1/- .11 n i-• `x,19 PROfFS■IE IN: 165.60(6 Sr— liiiii� • U..1...4...n �� IE OUT; 16530(6-N) I I I■ �--01-. , p 1� OMNI Parcel 2 ' I_ 6' so 0933. rn.4. r4R( XOP Ir °arcel 1 �mm I I I ] 179 LF 36' DIA DE TEN nON PIPE 0 0f. lQ FF 17520 '+ FF-173.60 i I I i 30 n F-I 1 ) IE 167.10 I Z 1 D.S. a. A ED W r Q II 1 I- V) CL 6' S0 O 93% 1 H 6 Z II CL - lullli 48-ACCESS UN i! RIM 172.60(MATCH EXIST.) 31450 SQ FT L 1E:165.60 • a I • I s I. I E I I / ❑ —IIN " U s / I Q 'I . cMt70O0 / I IE: 166,40 I r m•1% ■ - 5 I FF 176.215 FF-163.30 a° � 1 I I'''', ..."4 s .... ...... 1 6'SDO1X I 1 ® �0ute� mK M111.Qno s M E A■erIYr611m® 3481 SQ FT I I MaIIMYO. 'M ce 1 I 3953 SQ FT MT. 1140400044 14 4.0 c IE: 157.35 I MB hum. commcomm.MO044. oK..wm e, s AID I 44 CH[ve♦ It 10 ¢o 1 WPM 0 CATCHMENT MAP 1^° Dodge Review Re-Submittal-November 2006 ..b ., 5273 Wej$9Li6orhooc{ Ale di y Pa cU vyiebe -fs ' AFFIDAVIT OF MAILli.J/POSTING NEIGHBORHOLi MEETING NOTICE IMPORTANT NOTICE: THE APPLICANT IS REQUIRED TO MAIL THE CITY OF TIGARD"A COPY OF THE' - NEIGHBORHOOD MEETING NOTICE THAT PERTAINS TO THIS AFFIDAVIT AT THE SAME TIME PROPERTY OWNERS ARE MAILED NOTICE, TO THE ADDRESS BELOW: City of Tigard Planning Division 13125 SW Hall Boulevard Tigard, OR 97223-8189 . IN ADDITION, THE APPLICANT SHALL SUBMIT:_THIS AFFIDAVIT & COPIES OF ALL NOTICES AT THE TIME OF APPLICATION. MAILING: I, ' 1Alr'T r1 E. MIL.O � , being duly sworn, depose and say that on the 2-o day of vu�� 20 Or.o . I caused to have mailed to each of the persons on the attached list, a notice of a meeting to discuss a proposed development at(or near) CoC200 \e! 1 :),"1.CT^ RottO r T l(d'2,0, D IZEEo0rJ ,a copy of which notice so mailed is attached hereto and made a part of hereof. I further state that said notices were enclosed in envelopes plainly addressed to said ersons a d wee deposited� ' �lon the date indicated above in the United States Post Office located at 12.2-10 SW ( In 0{ c III( (�,K with postage prepaid thereon. Signature (In the presence of a Notary Public) POSTING: I, \A/AL-16.-1 Z• N110012-6,1 , do affirm that I am (represent) the party initiating interest in a proposed pF■ifLcPrl -T affecting the land located at (state the approximate location(s) IF no address(s) and/or tax lot(s) currently registered) Gcc,ein Sw i v1TA p-c P, TI -4(0, ORac s-J , and did on the 20 day of J11.-SE. , 20 nco personally post notice indicating that the site may be proposed for a LA-10 (SE. Pet-441lT application, and the time, date and place of a neighborhood meeting to discuss the proposal. The sign was posted at C404900 W ITi cO , Ttc-,' Q, 6)I2--- " " (state location you posted notice on property) i nature (In the presence of a Notary Public) (THIS SECTION FOR A STATE OF OREGON, NOTARY PUBLIC TO COMPLETE/NOTARIZE) STATE OF r 01 \ ) County of ij 1 ss. Subscribed and swo n/affirmed before me on the t) day of , 200/9. .,f•+,. OFFICIAL SEAL CAROL LIDBERG - NOTARY PUBLIC - OREGON ®,454:01r l COMMISSION NO. 401608 I , I ' ,I ' , MY COMMISSION EXPIRES JAN. 19,2010 NOTARY PUBLIC OF OREGO 4, My Commission Expires: I ' 0 Applicant, please complete the information below: NAME OF PROJECT OR PROPOSED DEVELOPMENT: f J -4 TZ fug-N ITUIZE. TYPE OF PROPOSED DEVELOPMENT: k1, c - MOO) Fi crz(flt Address or General Location of Subject Property: e)CoCY.s SW F� /'I ITA I2 w Subject Property Tax Map(s)and Lot#(s): TA LOT 1 100 r M A' '2.51 - 12.A0 hAlogin\patty\masters\afridavit of mailing-posting neighborhood meeting.doc Paul Schatz Furniture Neighborhood Meeting Minutes Project Number: 106051 July 5, 2006 Attendees: Representing: Telephone: David Atiyeh Atiyeh Brothers Rug and Carpet (503) 639-8642 Discussion: Mildren Design Group informed Mr. Atiyeh of development. No specific questions were asked. • MILDREN DESIGN GROUP,P.C. Architecture • Space Planning June 20, 2006 Re: Paul Schatz Furniture Dear Interested Party: Mildren Design Group represents the owner of the property located at 2S1 — 12AD, Tax Lot 1100. Our client is considering proposing a remodeling and addition to the existing building at this location. Prior to applying to the City of Tigard for the necessary land use approvals, I would like to discuss the proposal in more detail with the surrounding property owners and residents. You are invited to attend a meeting on: Wednesday, July 5, 2006 Mildren Design Group 7650 SW Beveland Street, Suite 120 Tigard, OR 97223 6:00 P.M. Please note this will be an informational meeting on preliminary plans. These plans may be altered prior to the submittal of the application to the City. I look forward to more specifically discussing the proposal with you. Please call me at (503)244-0552 if you have any questions. cliSincerAliky, Gene ildren chit ct Attachment: Vicinity Map 7650 SW Beveland Street,Suite 120 Tigard,Oregon 97223 503 244 0552 Fax 503 244 0417 A `J CITY of TIGARD GEOGRAPHIC INi OR NATION SYSTEM \ r O� 1 AREA NOTIFIED 1 (500') SW MEADOWS RD C��vw� L Au EADOWS RD _ . IL Q CI 2S112A1100400 I • FOR: GENE MILDREN z in 2107/1009 0 RE: 2S112AD, 01100 2S11211A00600 1 _ E011111110 03 vt 1 1 100 2 L j \ -----------2511211400500 Property owner information is valid for 3 months from \ f 1 the date printed on this map. �. 2511211000501 - 1 2511111000301 2• 1iA001 2 1111110054 1 R. 2511211003401IV:. r 1,I 1.I Y1EO71C01100 21E071001000 . IL 251"Y11oD0 10 �\�`���� • II 2S112A000500 2S112 100200 ��\t 2511211TO `\\ \ 2 E07BC054I6 21E071C01200 YEOE 2 E0 );1 la ._� YE0; , II'D 2511411100600 2 E07BC05410 s 1 a �I 1111111 .i' —'S sii cr 251121110 MINI �—'g r 2110 BCD 405 -'NI ■ 111t11150100 2511211101700 2511211000900 a■ ■ N• ..W.SOMA RD 21071005414 I f I0 100 200 300 400 500 Feet 1"=384 leer \ , a CARDINAL LN ir.iI,.11 . R. TIGARD 6,11r Information on this map is for general location only and i should be verified with the Development Services Division. t 13125 SW Hall Blvd Tigard,OR 97223 _- (503)639-4171 ill _ hftp•Jfvn+vr.ci.dgard.or.us Community Development Plot date:Jun 14,2006;C:Unagic\MAGIC03.APR r^ r' x ' • CITY Of TIGARD COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT PLANNING DIVISION : 13 I2S SW HALL BOULEVARD --. TIGARD, OREGON 97223 TIGARD PRONE: 503-639-4171 FAX: 503-624-3681 (Attn: Patty/Planning) - -•. NNO.FOOT RoPR Y @ U E2 11A Property owner information is valid for 3 months from the date of your request INDICATE ALL PROJECT MAP & TAX LOT NUMBERS (i.e. 1S134AB, Tax Lot 00100) OR THE ADDRESSES FOR ALL PROJECT PARCELS BELOW: ft. • t • - S 1 - 2Ato • PLEASE BE AWARE THAT ONLY 1 SET OF LABELS WILL BE PROVIDED AT THIS TIME FOR HOLDING YOUR NEIGHBORHOOD MEETING. After submitting your land use application to the City, and the protect planner has reviewed your application for completeness, you will be notified by means of an incompleteness letter to obtain your 2 final sets of labels. The 2 final sets of labels need to be laced op envelopes (no self-adhesive envelopes please) with first class letter-rate postage on,the envelopes in the term of postage stamps (no metered envelopes and no return address) and resubmitted to the City for the purpose 01 roviding notice to property owners of the proposed land use application and the decision. The 2 sets at envelopes must be kept separate. The person listed below will be called to pick up and pay for the labels when they are ready. NAME OF CONTACT PERSON: t c...,Dn2-At_._ PHONE: 572)3,1244-vs sz FAX: 37 .44 - < 4 7 EMAIL: epee G 0,445pc, s olt�t This request may be mailed, faxed or hand delivered to the City of Tigard, P ease allow a 2-day minimum for processing requests. Upon completion of our request, the contact person will be called to pick up their request that will be placed in "Will Cali by their last name, at the Community Development Reception Desk. The cost of processing your request must be paid at the time of pick up, as exact cost can not be • pre-determined. PLEASE NOTE: FOR REASONS OF ACCURACY, ONLY ORIGINAL MAILING LABELS PROVIDED BY THE CITY VS. RE-TYPED MAILING LABELS WILL BE ACCEPTED. Cost Description: $11 to generate the mailing list,plus$2 per sheet for printing the list onto labels(20 addresses per sheet). • Then, multi.l the cost to •rint one set of labels b the number of sets re•uested, *EXAMPLE* • • * COST FOR THIS REQUEST 4 sheets of labels x$2/sheet=$8.60 x 2 sets= s15.00 2-sheet(s)of labels x$21sheet x \ sets- `•ti. () I„sheets of labels x$2/sheet for Interested parties x;sets= $ 4.00 ..j.sheet(s)of labels x$21sheet for interested parties sets= 2.00 GENERATE LIST = X11.00 -ENERATE LIST - L11114 14 TOTAL = $31.00 TOTAL $1 1 .0 0 4(1 VI( • CITY OF TIGARD COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT PLANNING DIVISION : 13125 SW HALL BOULEVARD " Is. TIGARD, OREGON 97223 • T T GARI PHONE: 503.639-4171 FAX: 503-624.3681 (Attn: Patty/Planning BE@ B@• ' ' M @t'1N 11@ ( Property owner information is valid for 3 months from the date of your request INDICATE ALL PROJECT MAP & TAX LOT NUMBERS (i.e. 1S134AB, Tax Lot 00100) OR THE ADDRESSES FOR ALL PROJECT PARCELS BELOW: 7 7s,x t - Ncf3P -251 -12 Ac, PLEASE BE AWARE THAT ONLY 1 SET OF LABELS WILL BE PROVIDED AT THIS TIME FOR HOLDING YOUR NEIGHBORHOOD MEETING. After submitting your land use application to the City, and the project planner has reviewed your application for completeness, you will be notified by means of an incompleteness letter to obtain your 2 final sets of labels. The 2 final sets of labels need to be placed on envelopes (no self-adhesive envelopes please) with first class letter-rate ostage on the envelopes in the form of postage stamps (no metered envelopes and no return address) and resubmitted to the City for the purpose o-t providing notice to property owners of the proposed land use application and the decision. The 2 sets of envelopes must be kept separate. The person listed below will be called to pick up and pay for the labels when they are ready. NAME OF CONTACT PERSON: ,mot c L-n PHONE: s---c.V .4 -�� s FAX: -0-5/24-44- - o(4 t 7 EMAIL: Jpc_ • «�� This request may be mailed, faxed or hand delivered to the City of Tigard. Please allow a 2-day minimum for processing reques{s. Upon completion of your request, the contact person will be called to pick up their request that will be placed in "Will Calr by their last name, at the Community Development Reception Desk. The cost of processing your request must be paid at the time of pick up, as exact cost can not be pre-determined. PLEASE NOTE: FOR REASONS OF ACCURACY, ONLY ORIGINAL MAILING LABELS PROVIDED BY THE CITY VS. RE-TYPED MAILING LABELS WILL BE ACCEPTED. Cost Description: $11 to generate the mailing list, plus$2 per sheet for printing the list onto labels(20 addresses per sheet). • Then, multiply the cost to print one set of labels by the number of sets requested. *EXAMPLE* **COST FOR THIS REQUEST ** 4 sheets of labels x$2/sheet=$8.00 x 2 sets= $16.00 sheet(s)of labels x$2/sheet=$ x sets= 1 sheets of labels x$2/sheet for interested parties x 2 sets= $ 4.00 sheet(s)of labels x$2/sheet for interested parties=$ x sets= GENERATE LIST = $11.00 GENERATE LIST = $11.00 TOTAL = $31.00 TOTAL = $ \ CITY of TIGARD i Q' GEOGRAPHIC INFORMATION SYSTEM q AREA ND11FIED (5D0') SW MEADOWS RD nilli1110 a a 2s1127ul00400 FOR: GENE MILDREN ri 2s112111100600 2 E0711100900 RE: 2S 112AD, 01100 1E0 03 2S112AA00500 2 5011800 2 Property owner information is valid for 3 months from 1 \ .-_ AR the date printed on this map. 2S112A000501 "1 \ \\ \ I I 2511 '0^ 10!301 211 211001 ` 211071190 PA'. `�� „ 215010001100 21E07BC01000 2S112S11 110 0 ,\�``�� )NIL 2S112A000500 2S712A000200 �. 2$112A000400 \\\```\\ 2501800 $ 21E070101200 If 2 Eon II Eol It;I+1r' _��III►■ III 2S112A000600 m EO ��"11 .■ 25112 8300 �� i IN iIii ,iIIifl —2S112A000700 1: 78901400 N • Eonoo IlIllIliji,,,, 0 100 200 300 400 500 Foot Ii V.3641est r CARDINAL LN 111121.1111111111111 0__ is ..,.1\< Or TIGARD Information d e on this map is for general Services Di and should be verified with the Development Services Division. 13125 ar,SW OR Hall Blvd — -�__ A_` drit Tigard,OR 9rdor (503)639-4171 mn hdpJ/www.ci.tigsrd.or.us Community Development Plot date:Jun 14,2006;C:\magic\MAGIC03.APR 2S112AD-01200. 21E07BC05404 ATIVEH BROS INC HOME BLDR ASN METRO PTLD 6750 SW BONITA RD 15555 SW BANGY RD TIGARD, OR 97224 LAKE OSWEGO OR, 97035 21E07BC06100 21E07BC01100 BENAVIDES LISA C KRUSE VILLA LLC 15471 BRIANNE CT 9725 SW BEAVERTON HILLSDALE HWY STE LAKE OSWEGO OR, 97035 BEAVERTON OR, 97005 2S112AA-00600 21E07BC08800 CALWEST INDUSTRIAL HOLDINGS LLC LAKE OSWEGO TOWNHOMES HMOWNRS BY ePROPERTYTAX INC ASSOC DEPT#207 14511 WESTLAKE DR PO BOX 4900 LAKE OSWEGO OR, 97035 SCOTTSDALE,AZ 85261 2S112AA-00400 21E07BC01200 Cr WEST INDUSTRIAL HOLDINGS LLC LOCKWOOD MICHAEL P&TANYA BY e ERTYTAX IN 2610 SOUTH SHORE BLVD DEPT#207 LAKE OSWEGO OR, 97034 PO B 0 ,SCOTTSDALE,AZ 85261 2S112AA-00500 21E07BC06000 • - • EST INDUSTRIAL HO i GS LLC MOIR THOMAS BY ePRO• • YT• 18068 HOBBIT CT DEPT#207 LAKE OSWEGO OR, 97034 PO BO. •00 S • TSDALE,AZ 85261 21E07BC05700 21E07BC05900 CHEN JAMES MORGAN KELLY JO 47957 AVALON HEIGHTS 2204 N SKIDMORE CT FREMONT CA, 94539 PORTLAND OR, 97217 21E07BB00902 2S112AD-01100 COLUMBIA RIVER GIRL SCOUTS PACA PROPERTIES LLC PO BOX 2427 6600 SW BONITA RD LAKE OSWEGO OR, 97035 TIGARD,OR 97224 21 E07BC05800 2S112AD-01300 DAVIS MARGAUX PACIFIC REALTY ASSOCIATES 15483 BRIANNE CT ATTN:N PIVEN LAKE OSWEGO OR, 97035 15350 SW SEQUOIA PKWY#300 PORTLAND,OR 97224 2S112AD-00900 21E07BB00900 HD DEVELOPMENT OF MARYLAND INC PARKER FURNITURE INC 75% BY HOME DEPOT USA INC 10375 SW BEAVRTN-HLLSDL HWY PROPERTY TAX DEPT#4002 BEAVERTON OR, 97005 PO BOX 105842 ATLANTA,GA 30348 21E07BC05500 ::00903 HINES DEREK J&SIBONEY M PARKER • TURE I► • 1280 10TH ST 10375 SW ' ' • - LSDL HWY WEST LINN OR, 97068 BE• -TON OR, 97005 2S112A0-00500 2S112AD-00301 . • ROGERS MACHINERY CO INC SMETS JOHN E&Mt r<IETTA D TRS PO BOX 230429 PO BOX 560 PORTLAND,OR 97281 AURORA,OR 97002 2S112AD-00501 2S112AD-00200 e _ u. INERY = ANY SM - E&MARI • : TRS INC \ PO BOX 560 PO BO 1429 \ AUROR°, SR 97002 P• LAND,OR 97281 2S112AD-00600 21E07BC01400 RYDER TRUCK RENTAL INC TERCEK JOHN M&KATHY M LOC#1876 14108 KNAUS RD BY PROPERTY TAX DEPT 3B LAKE OSWEGO OR, 97034 PO BOX 025719 MIAMI,FL 33102 21E07BC06200 D-00401 SANNIDHI DURGA TIGARD 15438 STEPHANIE CT 13125 AL ■ D LAKE OSWEGO OR, 97035 TI 'D,OR 97223 21E07BC05405 21E07BC01000 SHARFF FAMILY LLC UNITED DOMINION REALTY TRUST INC 55 NW 95TH AVE PO BOX 4900 DEPT 111 PORTLAND OR, 97229 SCOTTSDALE AZ, 85261 21 E07BC05406 2S112AD-00700 FF FAMILY UNITED PIPE&SUPPLY CO INC 55 NW • - E 7600 SE JOHNSON CREEK BLVD PO: w ND 0-, •7229 PORTLAND,OR 97206 07BC05400 21E07BC05600 SHA' A C WIEBER CHRISTINE G 55 N - - 15491 BRIANNE CT '.'TLAND OR, 9 '29 LAKE OSWEGO OR, 97035 21E07BC05401 SIMPSON JUDITH S 55 NW 95TH AVE PORTLAND OR, 97229 2S112AD-00400 SMETS JOHN E&MARIETTA D TRS PO BOX 560 AURORA,OR 97002 2S112AD-00300 SME • NE&M•: ` • RS PO BOX 56' AU'•' •,OR 97002 • Nathan and Ann Murdock Mildren Desi�. group PO Box 231265 Attn: Gene Mildren Tigard, OR 97281 7650 SW Beveland Street, Suite 120 Tigard, OR 97223 Sue Rorman Diane Baldwin 11250 SW 82nd Avenue 3706 Kinsale Lane SE Tigard, OR 97223 Olympia, WA 98501 Naomi Gallucci 11285 SW 78th Avenue Tigard, OR 97223 Michael Trigoboff 7072 SW Barbara Lane Tigard, OR 97223 Brad Spring 7555 SW Spruce Street Tigard, OR 97223 Alexander Craghead 12205 SW Hall Boulevard Tigard, OR 97223-6210 Gretchen Buehner 13249 SW 136th Place Tigard, OR 97224 John Frewing 7110 SW Lola Lane Tigard, OR 97223 CPO 4B 16200 SW Pacific Highway, Suite H242 Tigard, OR 97224 CPO 4M Pat Whiting 8122 SW Spruce Tigard, OR 97223 CITY OF TIGARD - EAST INTERESTED PARTIES (i:\curpin\setup\labels\CIT East.doc) UPDATED: 21-Oct-05 5ervtce Providers Jul . 12 . 2006 11 :46AM CLEAN WATER SERVICES 503 6814439 No .3597 P. 1 5—Z73 CleanWater Services I.)ur c•1wuutniclit is el car. July 12, 2006 Lans Stout TM Rippey Consulting Engineers 6600 SW Bonita Road Tigard, Oregon 97224 Re: Service Provider Letter for 2S112AD0100 CWS File No 06-001941; Remodel/Addition to existing building Clean Water Services has reviewed your proposal for the above referenced activity on your site. Staff has conducted a pre-screen review and requested completion of a Sensitive Areas Certification Form. Following review of submitted materials it appears that Sensitive Areas do not exist on-site or within 200' from your project. In light of this result, this document will serve as your Service Provider letter as required by Resolution and Order 04-9, Section 3.02.1. All required permits and approvals must be obtained and completed under applicable local, state, and federal law. This concurrence letter does NOT eliminate the need to protect Sensitive Areas if they are subsequently identified on your site. If you have any questions, please feel free to call me at 503-681-3613. Sincerely, Julie Wirth Environmental Plan Review Post-it°Fax Note 7671 Date 7j)g.)0//Le �pa°ges► To Larts S�a'�� From Co,/Dept..-- •7 1 /� (M tt pp i't� Co.1rAS cis Phone# Phone n r 5Vcs ,SDI, 3Cel Fax# to 3, 3 Fax# 7550 SW Hillsboro Highway• Hillsboro,Oregon 97173 Phone:(503)681-3600• Fax:(503)681-3603 •www.CleenWater5ervices,org LAND USE PROPOSAL DESCRIPTION 120 DAYS = 4/14/2007 FILE NO.: SITE DEVELOPMENT REVIEW(SDR) 2006-00008 VARIANCE (VAR) 2006-00086 FILE TITLE: PAUL SCHATZ MAJOR MODIFICATION OWNER: PACA Properties,LLC APPLICANT: Mildren Design Group,P.C. 6600 SW Bonita Road Attn: Gene Mildren Tigard, OR 97224 7650 SW Beveland Street,Suite 120 Tigard, OR 97223 REQUEST: The applicant is requesting approval to construct a 4,746 square foot addition to an existing commercial building and to modify the parking areas and drive aisles. A variance has also been requested to reduce the access width from 50 feet with 40 feet of pavement to 37 feet with 30 feet of pavement. LOCATION: 6600 SW Bonita Road;Washington County Tax Map 2S 112AD,Tax Lot 1100. ZONE: I-P: Industrial Park District. The I-P zoning district provides appropriate locations for combining light manufacturing, office and small-scale commercial uses, e.g.,restaurants,personal services and fitness centers in a campus-like setting. Only those light industrial uses with no off- site impacts, e.g. noise, glare, odor, vibration, are permitted in the I-P zone. In addition to mandatory site development review, design and development standards in the I-P zone have been adopted to unsure that developments will be well-integrated, attractively landscaped, and pedestrian-friendly. APPLICABLE REVIEW CRITERIA: Community Development Code Chapters 18.360, 18.370, 18.390, 18.530, 18.705, 18.725, 18.730, 18.745, 18.755, 18.765, 18.780, 18.790 and 18.810. DECISION MAKING BODY BELOW: ❑ TYPE I ® TYPE II ❑ TYPE III ❑ TYPE IV COMMENTS WERE SENT: DECEMBER 26, 2006 COMMENTS ARE DUE: JANUARY 9, 2007 ❑ HEARINGS OFFICER (MON.) DATE OF HEARING: TIME: 7:00 PM ❑PLANNING COMMISSION (MON.) DATE OF HEARING: TIME: 7:00 PM ❑ CITY COUNCIL (TUES.) DATE OF HEARING: TIME: 7:30 PM ® STAFF DECISION (TENTATIVE) DATE OF DECISION: JANUARY 26, 2007 COMPONENTS RELATED TO THE PROJECT AVAILABLE FOR VIEWING IN THE PLANNING DIVISION ® VICINITY MAP ® DRAINAGE PLAN ® IMPACT STUDY ® SITE PLAN ® STORM WATER ANALYSIS ❑ WETLANDS DELINEATION ® NARRATIVE ® TREE PLAN ® OTHER MISCELLANEOUS STAFF CONTACT: Cheryl Caines,Assistant Planner (503) 639-4171,Ext. 2437 .`- RECEIVE MILDREN DESIGN GROUP,P.C. D ARCHITECI"UKE • SPACE PLANNING c C� 7650 SW Beveland Street,Suite 120 ` 1 2006 Tigard,Oregon 97223 CI T y Voice:503-244-0552 Fax:503-244-0417 P�ANN! O�TIGq F D LETTER OF TRANSMITTAL To: City of Tigard Date: September 18,2006 Attention: Cheryl Caines Copy to: Project Name: Paul Schatz Furniture Project Number: 106051 Attached items: Description: (1) Land Use Permit Application (1) Applicant's Statement for"Major Modification"to an Approved Site Development (2)sets Stamped Addressed#10 Envelopes (1) Documentary Evidence of Neighborhood Meeting (1) CWS Service Provider Letter (1) Copy of Pre-Application Conference Notes (1) Arborist Report (1) Check for filing Fee (3)sets A0.1 Title Sheet A1.1 Site Plan Survey (Existing Conditions Plan) C1.0 Grading Plan C2.0 Utility Plan C3.0 Details C4.0 Erosion Control Plan C4.1 Erosion Control Details L1.1 Planting Plan A2.1 Floor Plan A3.1 Building Elevations A3.2 Building Elevations X For your use _ For approval For your review As requested Remarks: Signed: Gene Mildren Mailed To be picked up X Delivered via MDG 251 12AD 1100 PUBLIC FACILITY PLAN Project: . .al Schatz COMPLETENESS CHECKLIST Date: 9/27/06 GRADING ® , Existing and proposed contours shown. ❑ Are there grading impacts on adjacent parcels? ❑ Adjacent parcel grades shown. ❑ Geotech study submitted? TTEET ISSUES Right-of-way clearly shown. Show Bonita Road ROW with dimensions- does existing ROW meet the required 96 feet for a 5-lane Collector with bike lanes? �! Centerline of street(s) clearly shown. Show this ►1 Street name(s) shown. ❑ Existing/proposed curb or edge of pavement shown. Show this ❑ Street profiles shown. NA ❑ Future Street Plan: Must show street profiles, topo on adjacent parcel(s), etc. ❑ Traffic Impact and/or Access Report Street grades compliant? Street/ROW widths dimensioned and appropriate? Show dimensions of existing and proposed, if different ❑ Private Streets? Less than 6 lots and width ,ak appropriate? 49 ❑ Other: 1) Sidewalk and planter strip, 2) ufrPOvideeliofoot wide sidewalk and 5 foot Undergrounding of utilities wide planter strip along Bo ita Road as discussed in the pre-app al ust place utilties underground or r- • •est from City Engineer that they be allowed to pay the fee- in-lieu based on "unusual"or "exceptional" circumstances SANITARY SEWER ISSUES ❑ Existing/proposed lines shown. ❑ Stubs to adjacent parcels required/shown? WATER ISSUES ❑ Existing/proposed lines w/sizes noted? ❑ Existing/proposed fire hydrants shown? ❑ Proposed meter location and size shown? ❑ Proposed fire protection system shown? Submit written comments from TVFR STORM DRAINAGE AND WATER QUALITY ISSUES k. Existing/proposed lines shown? Preliminary sizing calcs for water quality/detention Provide WQ calcs and detention calcs (even provided? if showing no detention required) ® Water quality/detention facility shown on plans? ❑ Area for facility match requirements from calcs? REVISED: 09/27/06 ❑ Facility shown outside any wt_ .ad buffer? ❑ Storm stubs to adjacent parcels required/shown? The submittal i hereby deemed 10 COMPLETE ® INCOMPLETE By: C Li* 1 ` 0(‘ Date: REVISED: 09/27/06 LAND USE APPLICI ON Date:Project: sr1aado-00008 COMPLETENESS REVIEW 7 COMPLETE ❑ INCOMPLETE STANDARD INFORMATION: ❑ Deed/Title/Proof Of Ownership ['f Neighborhood Mtg.Affidavits, Minutes, List Of Attendees 0 Impact Study(18.390) [0- USA Service Provider Letter ❑ Construction Cost Estimate ❑ #Sets Of Application Materials/Plans Er Pre-Application Conference Notes ❑ Envelopes With Postage(Verify Count) PROJECT STATISTICS: [] Building Footprint Size nc.v' [=1/ %Of Landscaping On Site 'IA nan-a g- ❑ % Of Building Impervious Surface On Site [I] Lot Square Footage PLANS DIMENSIONED: ❑ Building Footprint A c 0 ❑ Parking Space Dimensions(include Accessible&Bike Parking)El Truck Loading Space Where Applicable ❑ Building Height ❑ Access Approach And Aisle ❑ Visual Clearance Triangle Shown NVA ADDITIONAL PLANS: E' Vicinity Map ❑ Architectural Plan a Tree Inventory Q" Existing Conditions Plan ❑ Landscape Plan ❑J Site Plan ❑ Lighting Plan—KO I I Coed i4:oh -4 TREE PLAN 1 MITIGATION PLAN: ❑ ❑ ❑ ❑ ADDITIONAL REPORTS: (list any special reports) ❑ ❑ ❑ ❑ ❑ ❑ RESPONSE TO APPLICABLE CODE SECTIONS: _ ❑ 18.330(Conditional Use) LI 18.620(Tigard Triangle Design Standards) ❑ 18.765(Off-Street Parking/Loading Requn:ments)) ❑ 18.340(Director's Interpretation) 630 ashiop�Sguare Regional Center) ❑ 18.775(Sensitive lands Review) ❑ 18.350(Planned Development) 18.705(Aoo 0Egress/Circulation) El 18.780(Signs) 18.360 Site Development Review) n.+ `Corn, 18.710(A c c e s s o r y Residential Units) ■_ 18.785 TT _ Use Permits) 18.370(Variances/Adjustments) ❑ 18.715(Density Computations) • 18.790(Tree R ❑ 18.380(Zoning Map+Text Amendments) El .48.720(Design Compatibility Standards) __ U :. •5--(Visual Clearance Areas) ❑ 18.385(Miscellaneous Permits) ❑ 18.725(Environmental m Standards) ental Perfoance ■ 18.797(Water Resources(WR)Overlay District) ❑ 18.390(Decision Making Procedures/Impact Study) ❑ 18.730(Exceptions To Development Standards) 18J9B.4pfw lessCammuniration Facilities) ❑ 18.410(Lot Line Adjustments) ❑ 18.740(Historic Overlay) 18.810(Street&Utility Improvement Standards ❑ 18.420(Land Partitions) • • ' _ome Occupation Permits) ❑ 18.430(Subdivisions) • 18.745(Landscaping&Screening Standards) ❑ 18.510(Residential Zoning Districts) • . ,r : .., :. •, Home Regulagons) 1 mmerdal Zoning Districts) • 18.755(Mixed Sold wasteRecycirg Stor 18.530(Industrial Zoning Districts) ■ :. :4I (Nonconforming Situations) ADDITIONAL ITEMS: I:\curpin\masters\revised\land use application completeness review.dot REVISED: 17-Jan-01 s. City of Tigard, Oregon 13125 SW Hall Blvd. • Tigard, OR 97223 n TIGARD October 16, 2006 Gene Mildren Mildren Design Group, P.C. 7650 SW Beveland St., Suite 120 Tigard, OR 97223 RE: Completeness Review-Paul Schatz Furniture Major Modification Case File No. SDR2006-00008 Dear Mr. Miildren: The City has received your application for Site Development Review (SDR2006-00008) for parking/driveway modifications and a 4,746 square foot addition. Staff has completed a preliminary review of the submittal materials and has determined that the following additional information is necessary before the application can be deemed complete: 1. Narrative. Please revise and re-submit the narrative addressing the following code sections with facts, findings and conclusions: • Section 18.360.080.D (Request reduction to landscape requirement, which is 25% in the I-P zone), and 18.360.090.A.2,4(b), 10. • Section 18.530.030, 040 and 050.B. • Section 18.705.030.F. • Section 18.745.030 and 040. • Section 18.765.030.040, 050, and 070. ♦ Section 18.810 2. Adjustments. An adjustment to the minimum access requirements has been requested, but no fee was paid with this application. Total fees required: $301.00 ($602.00 x 50% fee). 3. Plans. Please submit revised plans showing the following: Site Plan ♦ Dimensions for the standard and compact parking spaces • Identify compact spaces • Trees to be removed • Label loading areas Phone: 503.639.4171 • Fax: 503.684.7297 • www.tigard-or.gov • TTY Relay: 503.684.2772 Elevations • Building Height 4. Public Facility Items. Please provide the information required by our development review engineer, as shown on the attached sheet. Should you have any questions with regard to these items, please contact me at 503-639- 4171 x2437. Sincerely, Cheryl Caines Assistant Planner c: SDR2006-00008 Land Use File is\curpin\cherrl\sdr\sdr21x16-1X$108\Paul Schatz Furniture Major Mod\sdr3))l-111$X18 incomplete.doc • PUBLIC FACILITY PLAN Project: . ..al Schatz COMPLETENESS CHECKLIST Date: 9/27/06 GRADING ® Existing and proposed contours shown. ❑ Are there grading impacts on adjacent parcels? ❑ Adjacent parcel grades shown. ❑ Geotech study submitted? STREET ISSUES ❑ Right-of-way clearly shown. Show Bonita Road ROW with dimensions- does existing ROW meet the required 96 feet for a 5-lane Collector with bike lanes? ❑ Centerline of street(s) clearly shown. Show this ® Street name(s) shown. ❑ Existing/proposed curb or edge of pavement shown. Show this ❑ Street profiles shown. NA ❑ Future Street Plan: Must show street profiles, topo on adjacent parcel(s), etc. ❑ Traffic Impact and/or Access Report ❑ Street grades compliant? ❑ Street/ROW widths dimensioned and appropriate? Show dimensions of existing and proposed, if different ❑ Private Streets? Less than 6 lots and width appropriate? ❑ Other: 1) Sidewalk and planter strip, 2) 1) Provide 8 foot wide sidewalk and 5 foot Undergrounding of utilities wide planter strip along Bonita Road as discussed in the pre-app, 2) Must place utilties underground or request from City Engineer that they be allowed to pay the fee- in-lieu based on "unusual"or "exceptional" circumstances SANITARY SEWER ISSUES ❑ Existing/proposed lines shown. El Stubs to adjacent parcels required/shown? WATER ISSUES ❑ Existing/proposed lines w/sizes noted? ❑ Existing/proposed fire hydrants shown? ❑ Proposed meter location and size shown? Cl Proposed fire protection system shown? Submit written comments from TVFR STORM DRAINAGE AND WATER QUALITY ISSUES ® Existing/proposed lines shown? ❑ Preliminary sizing calcs for water quality/detention Provide WQ calcs and detention calcs (even provided? if showing no detention required) ® Water quality/detention facility shown on plans? ❑ Area for facility match requirements from calcs? REVISED: 09/27/06 . ❑ Facility shown outside any vv, ,nd buffer? ❑ Storm stubs to adjacent parcels required/shown? _ The submittal 's hereby deemed ❑ COMPLETE ® INCOMPLETE By: Date: REVISED: 09/27/06 City of Tigard, Oregon - 13125 SW Hall Blvd. • Tigard, OR 97223 • • December 7,2006 Gene Mildren T I G A R D Mildren Design Group,P.C. 7650 SW Beveland St., Suite 120 Tigard, OR 97223 RE: Completeness Review-Paul Schatz Furniture Major Modification Case File No. SDR2006-00008 Dear Mr. Mildren: The City has received your application for Site Development Review (SDR2006-00008) for parking/driveway modifications and a 4,746 square foot addition. Staff has completed a preliminary- review of the submittal materials and has determined that the following additional information is necessary before the application can be deemed complete: 1. Narrative & Plans. Please revise and re-submit the narrative and plans addressing the following: ♦ Section 18.360.090.A.10—please provide facts as to why there are no windows in certain areas. I can assume that these are areas used for storage, but I may be incorrect. The facts must be provided by the applicant. ♦ Section 18.530.040 — no information was found on the cover sheet (A0.1) as noted in the narrative. Footnotes 2 & 6 for Table 18.530.2 define site coverage and the means to increase site coverage through 18.530.050.B. Please state in the narrative how all criteria in this section are met. ♦ Please indicate the number of existing and proposed bicycle parking spaces under the site analysis section of plan A1.1. Should you have any questions with regard to these items, please contact me at 503-639- 4171 x2437. Sincerely, CkL Cheryl Caines Assistant Planner c: Lans Stout,T. M. Rippey Consulting Engineers SDR2006-00008 Land Use File is\curpin\chcn•l\sdr\sdr2O(6-1NNN)8\Paul Schatz Furniture Major Mixl\sdr21N)G-INNN18 tno mplctc.Juc Phone: 503.639.4171 • Fax: 503.684.7297 • www.tigard-or.gov • TTY Relay: 503.684.2772 RECEIVED MILDREN DESIGN GROUP,P.C. ARCHITECTURE - SPACE PLANNING DEC 1 2 2006 7650 SW Beveland Street,Suite 120 Tigard,Oregon 97223 CITY OF TIGARD Voice:503-244-0552 Fax:503-244-0417 PLANNING/ENGINEERING LETTER OF TRANSMITTAL To: City of Tigard Date: December 12,2006 Attention: Cheryl Caines Copy to: Project Name: Paul Schatz Furniture Project Number: 106051 Attached items: Description: Land Use Permit Application-On File (1) Applicant's Statement for"Major Modification"to an Approved Site Development -Revised December 8,2006 Stamped Addressed#10 Envelopes-On File Documentary Evidence of Neighborhood Meeting-On File CWS Service Provider Letter-On File Copy of Pre-Application Conference Notes-On File (1) Arborist Report-Revised December 7,2006 Check for filing Fee-Paid (3)sets A0.1 Title Sheet C4.1 Erosion Control Details A1.1 Site Plan T1.0 Tree Plan A1.2 Site Plan and Details T1.1 Tree Plan Details Survey (Existing Conditions Plan) L1.1 Planting Plan C1.0 Grading Plan L1.2 Planting Plan C2.0 Utility Plan A2.1 Floor Plan C3.0 Details A3.1 Building Elevations C4.0 Erosion Control Plan A3.2 Building Elevations Storm Water Calculations-On File Check for Adjustment to the minimum Access Requirement-$301.00-Paid X For your use _ For approval For your review X As requested Remarks: Signed: Ryan Wing Mailed To be picked up X Delivered via MDG P:\106051\wp\tr-COT.3.wpd City of Tigard, Oregon 13125 SW Hall Blvd. • Tigart. )R 97223 • December 14,2006 T I GARD Gene Mildren Mildren Design Group,P.C. 7650 SW Beveland St.,Suite 120 Tigard, OR 97223 RE: Completeness Review-Paul Schatz Furniture Major Modification Case File No. SDR2006-00008 Dear Mr. Mildren: The City has received your application for Site Development Review (SDR2006-00008) for parking/driveway modifications and a 4,746 square foot addition. Staff has completed a preliminary review of the submittal materials and has determined that the following additional information is necessary before the application can be deemed complete: • Submit 10 copies of complete application packets. This includes plans and all application materials that have been submitted to the City. If items have been revised, please only include the revised version. Only six sets require full size plans; the other four should be reduced sets (11 x 17). • Submit 7 additional copies of plan sets. These can be reduced size copies (11 x 17). Should you have any questions with regard to these items, please contact me at 503-639- 4171 x2437. Sincerely, a. C � Cheryl Caines Assistant Planner c: Lans Stout,T. M. Rippey Consulting Engineers SDR2006-00008 Land Use File is\currin\cheryl\sdr\sdr21H o—INNN)8\Paul Schatz Furniture Major\I d\sdrJN 6-IN14 NIS incrmtpletc.doc Phone: 503.639.4171 • Fax: 503.684.7297 • www.tigard-or.gov • TTY Relay: 503.684.2772 I Cheryl Caines-Site coverage Pa e 1 From: "Lans Stout" <LStout @tmrippey.corn> To: "Cheryl Caines" <CHERYLC©tigard-or.gov> Date: 12/14/2006 8:01:23 AM Subject: Site coverage Cheryl: I got your voicemail requesting the we address Section 18.530.050.B of the Code. While there are conflicting definitions in the Code related to "lot" and "site" coverage, and I continue to believe that our narrative of October 30 correctly address the intent of the Code, I will provide additional narrative as you request in the interest of moving on Please let me know if the following is adequate. Section 18.050.B relates to instances in which an increase in "lot coverage" from 75% to 80% is requested. While the Code defines "site coverage" as the portion of the site covered by buildings, note (2) attached to Table 18.530 indicates that in this particular case "coverage" includes all impervious area. At the same time, note (5) provides a reference to subsection B with respect to increasing "coverage" to 80%, and yet note (6) allows a reduction in landscaping from 25% to 20% simply by going through the Development Review process. Finally, subsection B is titled "Reduction of lot coverage requirements", and yet the first section of this paragraph states that "Lot coverage may be increased..." by meeting several criteria. Nevertheless, the standards for an "increase in site coverage", as specified by 18.050.B can be met on this site, as follows: 1. 20% minimum landscape area... The data block provided on the cover sheet indicates that the site will have over 20% landscaping. 2(a). three-inch street trees... The landscape plan indicates the typical requirement of 2-inch trees since at the time of its preparation it was presumed that compliance with this section would not be required. A condition of approval to increase the size to 3-inch will address this criteria. 2(b). ten feet of landscaping along street frontages... The site plan indicates that along both 1-5 and Bonita Road at least 10 feet of landscaping is provided. 2(c) buffering and screening... There is no buffer requirement for new light industrial development abutting existing light industrial development. 2(d) landscape maintenance... A condition of approval to require submittal of a landscape maintenance contract will address this criteria. CC: "Paul Schatz Ill" <ps3©paulschatzfurniture.com>, "Gene Mildren" <gene @mdgpc.com>, "M. Ryan Wing" <ryan©mdgpc.com>, "Dick Bewersdorff' <DICK @tigard-or.gov> • 7/".1LORWPO.D°.. MILDREN DESIGN GROUP,P.C. ARCHITECTURE • SPACE PLANNING tls 7650 SW Beveland Street,Suite 120 Tigard,Oregon 97223 DEC 1 5 2006 Voice:503-244-0552 Fax:503-244-0417 CITY OF TIGARD LETTER OF TRANSMITTAL PLANNINGIENGINEERING To: City of Tigard Date: December 15,2006 Attention: Cheryl Caines Copy to: Project Name: Paul Schatz Furniture Project Number: 106051 Attached items: Description: Land Use Permit Application-On File 10 each of 13 Applicant's Statement for"Major Modification"to an Approved Site Development -Revised December 8,2006 Stamped Addressed#10 Envelopes-On File 10 each of 2 Documentary Evidence of Neighborhood Meeting 10 each of 1 CWS Service Provider Letter 10 each of 14 Copy of Pre-Application Conference Notes 10 each of 6 Arborist Report-Revised December 7,2006 Check for filing Fee-Paid 6 each of 16 Full Size Design Review Re-Submittal-December 2006 A0.1 Title Sheet C4.1 Erosion Control Details A1.1 Site Plan T1.0 Tree Plan A1.2 Site Plan and Details T1.1 Tree Plan Details Survey (Existing Conditions Plan) L1.1 Planting Plan C1.0 Grading Plan L1.2 Planting Plan C2.0 Utility Plan A2.1 Floor Plan C3.0 Details A3.1 Building Elevations C4.0 Erosion Control Plan A3.2 Building Elevations 11 each of 16 11x17 Design Review Re-Submittal-December 2006 A0.1 Title Sheet C4.1 Erosion Control Details A1.1 Site Plan T1.0 Tree Plan A1.2 Site Plan and Details T1.1 Tree Plan Details Survey (Existing Conditions Plan) L1.1 Planting Plan C1.0 Grading Plan L1.2 Planting Plan C2.0 Utility Plan A2.1 Floor Plan C3.0 Details A3.1 Building Elevations C4.0 Erosion Control Plan A3.2 Building Elevations 10 each of 18 Storm Water Calculations Check for Adjustment to the minimum Access Requirement-$301.00-Paid X For your use For approval For your review X As requested Remarks: Signed: Ryan Wing Mailed To be picked up X Delivered via MDG P:\106051\wp\trCOT.4.wpd City of Tigard, Oregon - 13125 SW Hall Blvd. • Tigard, OR 97223 • TIGARD, December 15, 2006 Gene Mildren Nlildren Design Group, P.C. 7650 SW Beveland St., Suite 120 Tigard, OR 97223 RE: Completeness Review—Paul Schatz Furniture Major Modification, Case File No. SDR2006-00008 Dear Mr. Mildren: The City has received your application for Site Development Review (SDR2006-00008) for parking/driveway modifications and to construct a 4,746 square foot addition. Staff has completed a preliminary review of your submittal materials and has determined that your application is now complete as of December 15, 2006. The formal comment and review process will now begin and typically takes 6 weeks to complete. If you have any questions regarding the project, please call me at 503-718-2437. Sincerely, C &-'-1)C- a . Cheryl Gaines Assistant Planner c: SDR2006-00002 Land Use File Phone: 503.639.4171 • Fax: 503.684.7297 • www.tigard-or.gov • TTY Relay: 503.684.2772 saloN DNEflI4MOD lNiOI ,I,VDI'IddV ilild . 1 CITY OF TIGARD alp PRE—APPLICATION CONFERENCE NOTES Comm ntyDeve pment Shaping f7 Better Community (Pre-Application Meeting Notes are Valid for Six (6) Months) rAFmG 0 (,-)3 --ab _ : e04.0 K-44/1 NON—RESIDENTIAL APPLICANT: M i I dyer s i AGENT: ae r,e M i l d,-e✓� Phone: (,"i 2') '+4- 055:.1 Phone: ( ) Scc rYa- PROPERTY LOCATION: ADDRESS/GENERAL LOCATION: 7(oS0 S co ac 4C(a,' ci. i S+-.%k /a TAX MAP(S)/LOT #(S): a?5 I IA AD- 0 f I pO NECESSARY APPLICATIONS: LDedel op r,nen'f" .Re v;e S DR) - Dr Minor Modi Lv tn11)) -TYpe- PROPOSAL DESCRIPTION: i -k r-i v r re rr o Q I � -€ ,o d_ ic4:4 , 5-�-vr.►-, W ez-i-ci b a.a�4;4) /�u�cl; -rccc; /� h e,f. Alu cl,�r,�e. v-a cc.s-L U/nn -e pat"!s; ex;.ffi nf -6J-ifhi - -t. COMPREHENSIVE PLAN MAP DESIGNATION: -Zn cL&s+ri a.( 'Pet r ZONING MAP DESIGNATION: 1- P ZONING DISTRICT DIMENSIONAL REQUIREMENTS [Refer to Code Section 18. , MINIMUM LOT SIZE: sq. ft. Average Min. lot width: 5. ft. Max. building height: 45. ft. Setbacks: Front 35 ft. Side O/5z, ft. Rear 050 ft. Corner du ft. from street. MAXIMUM SITE COVERAGE: r7 % Minimum landscaped or natural vegetation area: �?5' %. ,E NEIGHBORHOOD MEETING [Refer to the Neighborhood Meeting Handout) THE APPLICANT SHALL NOTIFY ALL PROPERTY OWNERS WITHIN 500 FEET, INTERESTED PARTIES, AND THE CITY OF TIGARD PLANNING DIVISION of their proposal. A minimum of two (2) weeks between the mailing date and the meeting date is required. Please review the Land Use Notification handout concerning site posting and the meeting notice. Meeting is to be held prior to submitting your application or the application will not be accepted. * NOTE: In order to also preliminarily address building code standards, a meeting with a Plans Examiner is encouraged prior to submittal of a land use application. CITY OF TIGARD Pre-Application Conference Notes Page 1 of 8 NON-Residential Application/Planning Division Section NARRATIVE (Refer to Code Chat. 18.390) The APPLICANT SHALL SUBMIT A NARRATIVE which provides findings based on the applicable approval standards. Failure to provide a narrative or adequately address criteria would be reason to consider an application incomplete and delay review of the proposal. The applicant should review the code for applicable criteria. Ix! IMPACT STUDY (Refer to Code Sections 18.390.040 and 18.390.050) As a part of the APPLICATION SUBMITTAL REQUIREMENTS, applicants are required to INCLUDE IMPACT STUDY with their submittal package. The impact study shall quantify the effect of the development on public facilities and services. The study shall address, at a minimum, the transportation system, including bikeways, the drainage system, the parks system, the water system, the sewer system and the noise impacts of the development. For each public facility system and type of impact, the study shall propose improvements necessary to meet City standards, and to minimize the impact of the development on the public at large, public facilities systems, and affected private property users. In situations where the Community Development Code requires the dedication of real property interests, the applicant shall either specifically concur with the dedication requirement, or provide evidence which supports the conclusion that the real property dedication requirement is not roughly proportional to the projected impacts of the development. \1 ACCESS (Refer to Chapters 18.705 and 18.7651 Minimum number of accesses: Minimum access width: Minimum pavement width: All driveways and parking areas, except for some fleet storage parking areas, must be paved. Drive-in use queuing areas: R WALKWAY REQUIREMENTS (Refer to Code Section 18.705.030) WALKWAYS SHALL EXTEND FROM THE GROUND FLOOR ENTRANCES OR FROM THE GROUND FLOOR LANDING OF STAIRS, ramps, or elevators of all commercial, institutional, and industrial uses, to the streets which provide the required access and egress. Walkways shall provide convenient connections between buildings in multi-building commercial, institutional, and industrial complexes. Unless impractical, walkways should be constructed between a new development and neighboring developments. I I SPECIAL SETBACKS (Refer to Code Chapter 18.7301 STREETS: feet from the centerline of • LOWER INTENSITY ZONES: feet, along the site's boundary. FLAG LOT: 10-FOOT SIDE YARD SETBACK. SPECIAL BUILDING HEIGHT PROVISIONS (Refer to Code Section 18.730.010.6.1 BUILDING HEIGHT EXCEPTIONS - Buildings located in a non-residential zone may be built to a height of 75 feet provided that: > A maximum building floor area to site area ratio (FAR) of 1.5 to 1 will exist; > All actual building setbacks will be at least half (1/2) of the building's height; and > The structure will not abut a residential zoned district. BUFFERING AND SCREENING (Refer to Code Chapter 18.745) In order TO INCREASE PRIVACY AND TO EITHER REDUCE OR ELIMINATE ADVERSE NOISE OR VISUAL IMPACTS between adjacent developments, especially between different land uses, the City requires landscaped buffer areas along certain site perimeters. Required buffer areas are described by the Code in terms of width. Buffer areas must be occupied by a mixture of deciduous and evergreen trees and shrubs and must also achieve a balance between vertical and horizontal plantings. Site obscuring screens or fences may also be required; these are often advisable even if not required by the Code. The required buffer areas may only be occupied by vegetation, fences, utilities, and walkways. Additional information on required buffer area materials and sizes may be found in the Development Code. CITY OF TIGARD Pre-Application Conference Notes Page 2 of 8 NON-Residential Application/Planning Division Section The ESTIMATED REQUIRE— BUFFER WIDTHS applicable to your proposal area are: feet along north boundary. feet along east boundary. feet along south boundary. feet along west boundary. IN ADDITION, SIGHT OBSCURING SCREENING IS REQUIRED ALONG: [I LANDSCAPING (Refer to Code Chapters 18345,18.765 and 18.705) STREET TREES ARE REQUIRED FOR ALL DEVELOPMENTS FRONTING ON A PUBLIC OR PRIVATE STREET as well as driveways which are more than 100 feet in length. Street trees must be placed either within the public right-of-way or on private property within six (6) feet of the right-of- way boundary. Street trees must have a minimum caliper of at least two (2) inches when measured four (4) feet above grade. Street trees should be spaced 20 to 40 feet apart depending on the branching width of the proposed tree species at maturity. Further information on regulations affecting street trees may be obtained from the Planning Division. A MINIMUM OF ONE (1) TREE FOR EVERY SEVEN (7) PARKING SPACES MUST BE PLANTED in and around all parking areas in order to provide a vegetative canopy effect. Landscaped parking areas shall include special design features which effectively screen the parking lot areas from view. These design features may include the use of landscaped berms, decorative walls, and raised planters. RECYCLING (Refer to Code Chapter 18.755) Applicant should CONTACT FRANCHISE HAULER FOR REVIEW AND APPROVAL OF SITE SERVICING COMPATIBILITY. Locating a trash/recycling enclosure within a clear vision area such as at the intersection of two (2) driveways within a parking lot is prohibited. Much of Tigard is within Pride Disposal's Service area. Lenny Hing is the contact person and can be reached at (503) 625-6177. . PARKING (Refer to Code Section 18.765.040) REQUIRED parking for this type of use: 1 . 0 Pe✓ I 000 GC bL.-, ( di ; Parking SHOWN on preliminary plan(s): nut- less -I an Eo spoees SECONDARY USE REQUIRED parking: Parking SHOWN on preliminary plan(s): NO MORE THAN 50% OF REQUIRED SPACES MAY BE DESIGNATED AND/OR DIMENSIONED AS COMPACT SPACES. PARKING STALLS shall be dimensioned as follows: D Standard parking space dimensions: 8 feet, 6 inches x 18 feet, 6 inches. D Compact parking space dimensions: 7 feet, 6 inches x 16 feet, 6 inches. Note: Parking space width includes the width of a stripe that separates the parking space from an adjoining space. Note: A maximum of three (3) feet of the vehicle overhang area in front of a wheel stop or curb can be included as part of required parking space depth. This area cannot be included as landscaping for meeting the minimum percentage requirements. HANDICAPPED PARKING: All parking areas shall PROVIDE APPROPRIATELY LOCATED AND DIMENSIONED DISABLED PERSON PARKING spaces. The minimum number of disabled person parking spaces to be provided, as well as the parking stall dimensions, are mandated by the Americans with Disabilities Act (ADA). A handout is available upon request. A handicapped parking space symbol shall be painted on the parking space surface and an appropriate sign shall be posted. • BICYCLE RACKS ARE REQUIRED FOR MULTI-FAMILY, COMMERCIAL AND INDUSTRIAL DEVELOPMENTS. Bicycle racks shall be located in areas protected from automobile traffic and in convenient locations. LOADING AREA REQUIREMENTS (Refer to Code Section 18.765.08 I. bEdg 1.5 i\s Every COMMERCIAL OR INDUSTRIAL BUILDING IN XCESS OF 10,000 SQUARE FEET all be provided with a loading space. The space size an. oca 1. . . - .pprove• .y the City Engineer. CITY OF TIGARD Pre-Application Conference Notes Page 3 of 8 NON-Residential Application Division Section `n.. , BICYCLE RACKS [Refer to Code ion 18.765] BICYCLE RACKS are required FOR MULTI-FAMILY, COMMERCIAL AND INDUSTRIAL DEVELOPMENTS. Bicycle racks shall be located in areas protected from automobile traffic and in convenient locations. I SENSITIVE LANDS (Refer to Code Chapter 18.775) The Code provides REGULATIONS FOR LANDS WHICH ARE POTENTIALLY UNSUITABLE FOR DEVELOPMENT DUE TO AREAS WITHIN THE 100-YEAR FLOODPLAIN, NATURAL DRAINAGEWAYS, WETLAND AREAS, ON SLOPES IN EXCESS OF 25 PERCENT, OR ON UNSTABLE GROUND. Staff will attempt to preliminary identify sensitive lands areas at the pre- application conference based on available information. HOWEVER, the responsibility to precisely identify sensitive land areas, and their boundaries, is the responsibility of the applicant. Areas meeting the definitions of sensitive lands must be clearly indicated on plans submitted with the development application. Chapter 18.775 also provides regulations for the use, protection, or modification of sensitive lands areas. RESIDENTIAL DEVELOPMENT IS PROHIBITED WITHIN FLOODPLAINS. I I STEEP SLOPES (Refer to Code Section 18.775.080.C) When STEEP SLOPES exist, prior to issuance of a final order, a geotechnical report must be submitted which addresses the approval standards of the Tigard Community Development Code Section 18.775.080.C. The report shall be based upon field exploration and investigation and shall include specific recommendations for achieving the requirements of Section 18.775.080.C. [� CLEANWATER SERVICES(CWS)BUFFER STANDARDS [Refer to R&0 96-44/USA Regulations-Chapter 3] LAND DEVELOPMENT ADJACENT TO SENSITIVE AREAS shall preserve and maintain or create a vegetated corridor for a buffer wide enough to protect the water quality functioning of the sensitive area. Design Criteria: The VEGETATED CORRIDOR WIDTH is dependent on the sensitive area. The following table identifies the required widths: TABLE 3.1 VEGETATED CORRIDOR WIDTHS SOURCE: CWS DESIGN AND CONSTRUCTION STANDARDS MANUAL/RESOLUTION &ORDER 96-44 SENSITIVE AREA DEFINITION SLOPE ADJACENT WIDTH OF VEGETATED TO SENSITIVE AREA4 CORRIDOR PER SIDE5 • Streams with intermittent flow draining: <25% • 10 to <50 acres 15 feet >50 to <100 acres 25 feet • Existing or created wetlands <0.5 acre 25 feet • Existing or created wetlands >0.5 acre <25% 50 feet • Rivers, streams, and springs with year-round flow • Streams with intermittent flow draining >100 acres • Natural lakes and ponds � • Streams with intermittent flow draining: >25% 1 10 to <50 acres 30 feet 1 >50 to <100 acres 50 feet • Existing or created wetlands >25% Variable from 50-200 feet. Measure • Rivers, streams, and springs with year-round flow in 25-foot increments from the starting • Streams with intermittent flow draining >100 acres point to the top of ravine (break in • Natural lakes and ponds <25% slope), add 35 feet past the top of ravine' 4Starting point for measurement = edge of the defined channel (bankful flow) for streams/rivers, delineated wetland boundary, delineated spring boundary, and/or average high water for lakes or ponds, whichever offers greatest resource protection. Intermittent springs, located a minimum of 15 feet within the river/stream or wetland vegetated corridor, shall not serve as a starting point for measurement. 5Vegetated corridor averaging or reduction is allowed only when the vegetated corridor is certified to be in a marginal or degraded condition. 6The vegetated corridor extends 35 feet from the top of the ravine and sets the outer boundary of the vegetated corridor. The 35 feet may be reduced to 15 feet. if a stamped geotechnical report confirms slope stability shall be maintained with the reduced setback from the top of ravine. CITY OF TIGARD Pre-Application Conference Notes Page 4 of 8 NON-Residential Application/Planning Division Section Restrictions in the Vegetate rridor: NO structures, development, construction activities, gardens, lawns, application of chemicals, dumping of any materials of any kind, or other activities shall be permitted which otherwise detract from the water quality protection provided by the vegetated corridor, except as provided for in the CWS Design and Construction Standards. Location of Vegetated Corridor: IN ANY RESIDENTIAL DEVELOPMENT WHICH CREATES MULTIPLE PARCELS or lots intended for separate ownership, such as a subdivision, the vegetated corridor shall be contained in a separate tract, and shall not be a part of any parcel to be used for the construction of a dwelling unit. CWS Service Provider Letter: PRIOR TO SUBMITTAL of any land use applications, the applicant must obtain a CWS Service Provider Letter which will outline the conditions necessary to comply with the R&O 96-44 sensitive area requirements. If there are no sensitive areas, CWS must still issue a letter stating a CWS Service Provider Letter is not required. 1 . 1 SIGNS (Refer to Code Chapter 18.180) SIGN PERMITS MUST BE OBTAINED PRIOR TO INSTALLATION OF ANY SIGN in the City of Tigard. A "Guidelines for Sign Permits" handout is available upon request. Additional sign area or height beyond Code standards may be permitted if the sign proposal is reviewed as part of a development review application. Alternatively, a Sign Code Exception application may be filed for Director's review. TREE REMOVAL PLAN REQUIREMENTS (Refer to Code Section 18.790.030.CJ A TREE PLAN FOR THE PLANTING, REMOVAL AND PROTECTION OF TREES prepared b .. certified arborist shall be provided for any lot, parcel or combination of lots or parcels for which a development application for a subdivision, partition, site development review, planned development, or conditional use is filed. Protection is preferred over removal where possible. THE TREE PLAN SHALL INCLUDE the following: ➢ Identification of the location, size and species of all existing trees including trees designated as significant by the City; ➢ Identification of a program to save existing trees or mitigate tree removal over 12 inches in caliper. Mitigation must follow the replacement guidelines of Section 18.790.060.D according to the following standards and shall be exclusive of trees required by other development code provisions for landscaping, streets and parking lots: Retainage of less than 25% of existing trees over 12 inches in caliper requires a mitigation program according to Section 18.150.070.D. of no net loss of trees; Retainage of from 25 to 50% of existing trees over 12 inches in caliper requires that two- thirds of the trees to be removed be mitigated according to Section 18.790.060.D.; Retainage of from 50 to 75% of existing trees over 12 inches in caliper requires that 50% of the trees to be removed be mitigated according to Section 18.790.060.D.; Retainage of 75% or greater of existing trees over 12 inches in caliper requires no mitigation; ➢ Identification of all trees which are proposed to be removed; and ➢ A protection program defining standards and methods that will be used by the applicant to protect trees during and after construction. TREES REMOVED WITHIN THE PERIOD OF ONE (1) YEAR PRIOR TO A DEVELOPMENT APPLICATION LISTED ABOVE will be inventoried as part of the tree plan above and will be replaced according to Section 18.790.060.D. MITIGATION (Refer to Code Section 18.190.060.EJ REPLACEMENT OF A TREE shall take place according to the following guidelines: ➢ A replacement tree shall be a substantially similar species considering site characteristics. ➢ If a replacement tree of the species of the tree removed or damaged is not reasonably available, the Director may allow replacement with a different species of equivalent natural resource value. CITY OF TIGARD Pre-Application Conference Notes Page 5 of 8 NON-Residential Application(Planning Division Section • ➢ If a replacement tre, the size cut is not reasonably avai, ; on the local market or would not be viable, the Director shall require replacement with more than one tree in accordance with the following formula: The number of replacement trees required shall be determined by dividing the estimated caliper size of the tree removed or damaged, by the caliper size of the largest reasonably available replacement trees. If this number of trees cannot be viably located on the subject property, the Director may require one (1) or more replacement trees to be planted on other property within the city, either public property or, with the consent of the owner, private property. ➢ The planting of a replacement tree shall take place in a manner reasonably calculated to allow growth to maturity. IN-LIEU OF TREE REPLACEMENT under Subsection D of this section, a party may, with the consent of the Director, elect to compensate the City for its costs in performing such tree replacement. 7 CLEAR VISION AREA (Refer to Code Chapter 18.795) The City requires that CLEAR VISION AREAS BE MAINTAINED BETWEEN THREE (3) AND EIGHT (8) FEET IN HEIGHT at road/driveway, road/railroad, and road/road intersections. The size of the required clear vision area depends upon the abutting street's functional classification and any existing obstructions within the clear vision area. (� ADDITIONAL LOT DIMENSIONAL REQUIREMENTS (Refer to Code Section 18.810.0601 MINIMUM LOT FRONTAGE: 25 feet unless lot is created through the minor land partition process. Lots created as part of a partition must have a minimum of 15 feet of frontage or have a minimum 15-foot-wide access easement. The DEPTH OF ALL LOTS SHALL NOT EXCEED 2% TIMES THE AVERAGE WIDTH, unless the parcel is less than 11/2 times the minimum lot size of the applicable zoning district. CODE CHAPTERS - 18.330(Conditional Use) 18.620(Tigard Triangle Design Standards) 18.765(Off-Street Parking/Loading Requirements) 18.340(Director's Interpretation) 18.630(Washington Square Regional Center) 18.775(Sensitive Lands Review) - 18.350(Planned Development) 18.705(Access/Egress/Circulation) L 18.780(signs) 18.360(Site Development Review) 18.710(Accessory Residential Units) _ 18.785(Temporary Use Permits) 18.370(vanances'Adjustments) 18.715(Density Computations) 18.790(Tree Removal) - 18.380(Zoning Map/Text Amendments) 18.720(Design Compatibility Standards) _X 18.795(visual Clearance Areas) - 18.385(Miscellaneous Permits) ` 18.725(Environmental Performance Standards) _ 18.798(Wireless Communication Facilities) _, 18.390(Decision Making Procedu Impad Study)) 18.730(Exceptions To Development Standards) , 18.810(Street&Utility Improvement Standards) - 18.410(Lot Line Adjustments) 18.740(Historic Overlay) - 18.420(Land Partitions) 18.742(Home Occupation Permits) - 18.430(subdivisions) A 18.745(Landscaping&Screening Standards) - 18.510(Residential Zoning Districts) 18.750(Manufactured/Mobil Home Regulations) 18.520(Commercial Zoning Districts) . 18.755(Mixed Solid Waste/Recycling Storage) ,\ 18.530(lndustnal Zoning Distrcts) 18160(Nonconforming Situations) CITY OF TIGARD Pre-Application Conference Notes Page 6 of 8 NON-Resioenbal Application/Planning Division Section ADDITIONAL CONCERNS OR COMMENT, D C- 11!) . 300. O5O r 3 4-ka.e.1 41,1e_ priveaa n7PI i CYr f7 o i5 w N i o- Mod - -s -to A. ny vne I Pit 6i -bede(de„-,t if Rrvir+rJ - - "1 r vt a r .> d -1- -Q b I el ;nS 'J s C,LX 4i- s;de ea n o a ,e c.vc mitts clue h) Lk);01_-1 k be, n `l / 'J.c 11/74 leba rt S .14tk-1 ctr. -- S h a,-( d o r U cam, ) Lie h -Bre 4+12 r s 7 To n 4- pa,-ki n j ex-j41-4"1 e,i l Cc 1p1- etI nC eJS ao)rtP ,-0( ? 1`-I acce-ss r ru��t Me�{� cc n -I- be me 4 — a-epI1 -Rr a n ace eJs. (-13 u i-r1ev1f 11 . 370 , 0 0 . C j) PROCEDURE Administrative Staff Review. Public hearing before the Land Use Hearings Officer. Public hearing before the Planning Commission. Public hearing before the Planning Commission with the Commission making a recommendation on the proposal to the City Council. An additional public hearing shall be held by the City Council. APPLICATION SUBMITTAL PROCESS All APPLICATIONS MUST BE ACCEPTED BY A PLANNING DIVISION STAFF MEMBER of the Community Development Department at Tigard City Hall offices. PLEASE NOTE: Applications submitted by mail or dropped off at the counter without Planning Division acceptance may be returned. The Planning counter closes at 5:00 PM. Maps submitted with an application shall be folded IN ADVANCE to 81/2" x 11". One, 81/2" x 11" map of a proposed project shall be submitted for attachment to the staff report or administrative decision. Applications with unfolded maps shall not be accepted. The Planning Division and Engineering Department will perform a preliminary review of the application and will determine whether an application is complete within 30 days of the counter submittal. Staff will notify the applicant if additional information or additional copies of the submitted materials are required. CITY OF TIGARD Pre-Application Conference Notes Page 7 of 8 NON-Residential Applicahon.%Plann ng Division Section The administrative decision public hearing will typically occur ap, ximately 45 to 60 days after an application is accepted as being complete by the Planning Division. Applications involving difficult or protracted issues or requiring review by other jurisdictions may take additional time to review. Written recommendations from the Planning staff are issued seven (7) days prior to the public hearing. A 10-day public appeal period follows all land use decisions. An appeal on this matter would be heard by the Tigard s . A basic flow chart which illustrates the review process is availablb from the Planning Division upon request. Land use applications requiring a public hearing must have notice posted on-site by the applicant no less than 10 days prior to the public hearing. This PRE-APPLICATION CONFERENCE AND THE NOTES OF THE CONFERENCE ARE INTENDED TO INFORM the prospective applicant of the primary Community Development Code requirements applicable to the potential development of a particular site and to allow the City staff and prospective applicant to discuss the opportunities and constraints affecting development of the site. BUILDING PERMITS PLANS FOR BUILDING AND OTHER RELATED PERMITS WILL NOT BE ACCEPTED FOR REVIEW UNTIL A LAND USE APPROVAL HAS BEEN ISSUED. Final inspection approvals by the Building Division will not be granted until there is compliance with all conditions of development approval. These pre-application notes do not include comments from the Building Division. For proposed buildings or modifications to existing buildings, it is recommended to contact a Building Division Plans Examiner to determine if there are building code issues that would prevent the structure from being constructed, as proposed. Additionally, with regard to Subdivisions and Minor Land Partitions where any structure to be demolished has system development charge (SDC) credits and the underlying parcel for that structure will be eliminated when the new plat is recorded, the City's policy is to apply those system development credits to the first building permit issued in the development (UNLESS OTHERWISE DIRECTED BY THE DEVELOPER AT THE TIME IN WHICH THE DEMOLITION PERMIT IS OBTAINED). PLEASE NOTE: The conference and notes cannot cover all Code requirements and aspects related to site planning that should apply to the development of your site plan. Failure of the staff to provide information required by the Code shall not constitute a waiver of the applicable standards or requirements. It is recommended that a prospective applicant either obtain and read the Community Development Code or ask any questions of City staff relative to Code requirements prior to submitting an application. AN ADDITIONAL PRE-APPLICATION FEE AND CONFERENCE WILL BE REQUIRED IF AN APPLICATION PERTAINING TO THIS PRE-APPLICATION CONFERENCE IS SUBMITTED AFTER A PERIOD OF MORE THAN SIX (6) MONTHS FOLLOWING THIS CONFERENCE (unless deemed as unnecessary by the Planning Division). PREPARED BY: aut,cAlic Q CITY Of TIGARD PLANNING DIVISION - STAFF PERSON HOLDING PRE-APP. MEETING PHONE: 503-639-4171 FAX: 503-684-7297 EMAIL l ene-r-1 IG ®-H cloy c4 CV TITLE 18(CM OF TIGARD'S COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT CODE)INTERNET ADDRESS: www.ci.tigard.or.us H:lpatty\masters\Pre-App Notes Commercial.doc Updated: 15-Dec-04 (Engineering section: preapp.eng) CITY OF TIGARD Pre-Application Conference Notes Page 8 of 8 NON-Residential Application/Planning Division Section PRE-APPLICATION CONFERENCE NOTES TIGAR ➢ ENGINEERING SECTION BillssingmlArerni Community Development Shaping Better Community PUBLIC FACILITIES Tax Mapts): 2S112A0 Tax Lolls): 1100 Use Type: SOR The extent of necessary public improvements and dedications which shall be required of the applicant will be recommended by City staff and subject to approval by the appropriate authority. There will be no final recommendation to the decision making authority on behalf of the City staff until all concerned commenting agencies, City staff and the public have had an opportunity to review and comment on the application. The following comments are a projection of public improvement related requirements that may be required as a condition of development approval for your proposed project. Right-of-way dedication: The City of Tigard requires that land area be dedicated to the public: (1.) To increase abutting public rights-of-way to the ultimate functional street classification right-of-way width as specified by the Community Development Code; or (2.) For the creation of new streets. Approval of a development application for this site will require right-of-way dedication for: ® SW Bonita Road to 96 feet (Future 5-lane Collector with bike lanes). It appears that there is adequate ROW. SW to feet 1 I SW to feet I I SW to feet Street improvements: E Half street improvements will be necessary along SW Bonita Road, to include: 1 feet of pavement 1 I concrete curb storm sewers and other underground utilities ® 8-foot concrete sidewalk with 5 foot planter strip (replace AC sidewalk) ® street trees sized and spaced per TDC T1 street signs, traffic control devices, streetlights and a two-year streetlight fee. CITY OF TIGARD Pre-Application Conference Notes Page 1 of 6 Engineering Department Section • • I I Other: street improvements will be necessary along SW , to include: feet of pavement I concrete curb storm sewers and other underground utilities -foot concrete sidewalk street trees I I street signs, traffic control devices, streetlights and a two-year streetlight fee. Other: I I street improvements will be necessary along SW , to include: feet of pavement I concrete curb storm sewers and other underground utilities -foot concrete sidewalk ❑ street trees street signs, traffic control devices, streetlights and a two-year streetlight fee. I I Other: street improvements will be necessary along SW , to include: feet of pavement concrete curb storm sewers and other underground utilities -foot concrete sidewalk street trees street signs, traffic control devices, streetlights and a two-year streetlight fee. ❑ Other: street improvements will be necessary along SW , to include: feet of pavement 1 concrete curb storm sewers and other underground utilities -foot concrete sidewalk street trees CITY OFTIGARD Pre-Application Conference Notes Page 2 of 6 Engineering Department Section street signs, traffic r hrol devices, streetlights and a two- 'r streetlight fee. I I Other: Agreement for Future Street Improvements: In some cases, where street improvements or other necessary public improvements are not currently practical, the improvements may be deferred. In such cases, a condition of development approval may be specified which requires the property owner(s) to provide a future improvement guarantee. The City Engineer will determine the form of this guarantee. The following street improvements may be eligible for such a future improvement guarantee: (1.) (2.) - Overhead Utility Lines: X Section 18.810.120 of the Tigard Municipal Code (TMC) requires all overhead utility lines adjacent to a development to be placed underground or, at the election of the developer, a fee in-lieu of undergrounding can be paid. This requirement is valid even if the utility lines are on the opposite side of the street from the site. If the fee in-lieu is proposed, it is equal to $ 35.00 per lineal foot of street frontage that contains the overhead lines. There are existing overhead utility lines which run adjacent to this site along SW Bonita Road. The applicant must underground the utilities or request, in writing, that the City Engineer allow the fee-in-lieu. Prior to issuance of building permits, the applicant shall either place these utilities underground, or pay the fee in-lieu described above. Sanitary Sewers: The nearest sanitary sewer line to this property is a(n) 8 inch line which is located in Bonita Road and in Sequoia Parkway. The proposed development must be connected to a public sanitary sewer. It is the developer's responsibility to connect to the public sewer Water Supply: The City of Tigard (Phone:(503) 639-4171) provides public water service in the area of this site. This service provider should be contacted for information regarding water supply for your proposed development. Fire Protection: Tualatin Valley Fire and Rescue District (South Division) [Contact: Eric McMullen, (503) 612-7010] provides fire protection services within the City of Tigard. The District should be contacted for information regarding the adequacy of circulation systems, the need for fire hydrants, or other questions related to fire protection. CITY OF TIGARD Pre-Application Conference Notes Page 3 of 6 Engineering Department Section Storm Sewer Improvements: All proposed development within the City shall be designed such that storm water runoff is conveyed to an approved public drainage system. The applicant will be required to submit a proposed storm drainage plan for the site, and may be required to prepare a sub-basin drainage analysis to ensure that the proposed system will accommodate runoff from upstream properties when fully developed. On-site detention is required for net, new impervious surface area exceeding 5000 sf. Storm Water Quality: The City has agreed to enforce Surface Water Management (SWM) regulations established by the Unified Sewerage Agency (USA) (Resolution and Order No. 00-7) which requires the construction of on-site water quality facilities. The facilities shall be designed to remove 65 percent of the phosphorus contained in 100 percent of the storm water runoff generated from impervious surfaces. The resolution contains a provision that would allow an applicant to pay a fee in-lieu of constructing an on- site facility provided specific criteria are met. The City will use discretion in determining whether or not the fee in-lieu will be offered. If the fee is allowed, it will be based upon the amount of impervious surfaces created; for every 2,640 square feet, or portion thereof, the fee shall be $210. Preliminary sizing calculations for any proposed water quality facility shall be submitted with the development application. It is anticipated that this project will require: Construction of an on-site water quality facility. Payment of the fee in-lieu. Water quality is required for new and existing impervious surface area runoff. Other Comments: All proposed sanitary sewer and storm drainage systems shall be designed such that City maintenance vehicles will have unobstructed access to critical manholes in the systems. Maintenance access roadways may be required if existing or proposed facilities are not otherwise readily accessible. 1) Where is stormwater discharged to a public system? TRAFFIC IMPACT FEES In 1990, Washington County adopted a county-wide Traffic Impact Fee (TIF) ordinance. The Traffic Impact Fee program collects fees from new development based on the developments projected impact upon the City's transportation system. The applicant shall be required to pay a fee based upon the number of trips which are projected to result from the proposed development. The calculation of the TIF is based on the proposed use of the land, the size of the project, and a general use based fee category. The TIF shall be calculated at the time of building permit issuance. In limited circumstances, payment of the TIF may be allowed to be deferred until the issuance of an occupancy permit. Deferral of the payment until occupancy is permissible only when the TIF is greater than $5,000.00. CITY OF TIGARD Pre-Application Conference Notes Page 4 of 6 Engineering Department Section Pay TIF PERMITS Public Facility Improvement (PH) Permit: Any work within a public right-of-way in the City of Tigard requires a PFI permit from the Engineering Department. A PFI permit application is available at the Planning/Engineering counter in City Hall. For more extensive work such as street widening improvements, main utility line extensions or subdivision infrastructure, plans prepared by a registered professional engineer must be submitted for review and approval. The Engineering Department fee structure for this permit is considered a cost recovery system. A deposit is collected with the application, and the City will track its costs throughout the life of the permit, and will either refund any remaining portion of the deposit, or invoice the Permittee in cases where City costs exceeds the deposit amount. NOTE: Engineering Staff time will also be tracked for any final design-related assistance provided to a Permittee or their engineer prior to submittal of a PFI permit application. This time will be considered part of the administration of the eventual PFI permit. The Permittee will also be required to post a performance bond, or other such suitable security. Where professional engineered plans are required, the Permittee must execute a Developer/Engineer Agreement, which will obligate the design engineer to perform the primary inspection of the public improvement construction work. The PFI permit fee structure is as follows: NOTE: If an PFI Permit is required,the applicant must obtain that permit prior to release of any permits from the Building Division. Building Division Permits: The following is a brief overview of the type of permits issued by the Building Division. For a more detailed explanation of these permits, please contact the Development Services Counter at 503-639-4171, ext. 304. Site Improvement Permit (SIT). This permit is generally issued for all new commercial, industrial and multi-family projects. This permit will also be required for land partitions where lot grading and private utility work is required. This permit covers all on-site preparation, grading and utility work. Home builders will also be required to obtain a SIT permit for grading work in cases where the lot they are working on has slopes in excess of 20% and foundation excavation material is not to be hauled from the site. Building Permit (BUP). This permit covers only the construction of the building and is issued after, or concurrently with, the SIT permit. Master Permit (MST). This permit is issued for all single and multi-family buildings. It covers all work necessary for building construction, including sub-trades (excludes grading, etc.). This permit can not be issued in a subdivision until the public improvements are substantially complete and a mylar copy of the recorded plat has been returned by the applicant to the City. For a land partition, the applicant must obtain an Engineering Permit, if required, and return a mylar copy of the recorded plat to the City prior to issuance of this permit. CITY OF TIPARD Pre-Application Conference Notes Page 5 of 6 Engineering Department Section Other Permits. There . other special permits, such as mL .tanical, electrical and plumbing that may also be required. Contact the Development Services Counter for more information. GRADING PLAN REQUIREMENTS FOR SUBDIVISIONS All subdivision projects shall require a proposed grading plan prepared by the design engineer. The engineer will also be required to indicate which lots have natural slopes between 10% and 20%, as well as lots that have natural slopes in excess of 20%. This information will be necessary in determining if special grading inspections will be required when the lots develop. The design engineer will also be required to shade all structural fill areas on the construction plans. In addition, each homebuilder will be required to submit a specific site and floor plan for each lot. The site plan shall include topographical contours and indicate the elevations of the corners of the lot. The builder shall also indicate the proposed elevations at the four corners of the building. PREPARED BY: co • i 3 •o ENGINEER! G DEPARTMENT STAFF DATE Phone: 1503)639-4111 Fax: 15031 624-0152 document3 Revised: September 2, 2003 CITY OFTIGARD Pre-Application Conference Notes Page 6 of 6 Engineering Department Section • RECEIVED PRE-APPLICATION 1PR 12 2006 Awa „4:11, CONFERENCE REQ CITY OF TIGARD 13125 SW Hall Blvd., Tigard, OR 97223 (503) 639-4171 FAX: (503) 684-7297 , GENERAL INFORMATION Applicant: M l(.Ali-mil ✓((o�( Fool°, FOR STAFF USE ONLY O Address: 76250 s i jfIEc t° Phone: 503. •OS52 nom)-91)(‘ 'Ot)L( �.urTE 120 2 Case No.: City: -1-((2,0 Zip: q 7?23 Receipt No.: Application Accepted By: S TE64T Contact Person: CeilE M1Wari 1 Phone: 503 244.055'2. / Date: `�0( 0,(, Property Owner/Deed Holder(s): peatcx, 6412 • DATE OF PRE-APP.: ((3/0(0 TIME OF PRE-APP.: > /(:67-) Address: (06,00 SW Q't+^lITA Phone: �e PRE-APP. HELD WITH: City: ?�vir�rw • Zip: Rev.7/1/05 i:\curpin\masters\revised\Pre-AppRequest.doc Property Address/Location(s): GoWO SW 9O'1 lT, • I i REQUIRED SUBMITTAL ELEMENTS (Note: applications will not be accepted Ne S 12, TEs, P 1 W without the required submittal elements) Tax Map &Tax Lot#(s): P, LPL. 1 r P�}IG'C't77O•4 p!/f? S000 -- 02O Zoning: P ❑ Pre-Application Conf. Request Form Site Size: 2 -9 2. ie-es- 4 COPIES EACH OF THE FOLLOWING: ❑ Brief Description of the Proposal and PRE-APPLICATION CONFERENCE INFORMATION any site-specific questions/issues that you would like to have staff research prior to the meeting. All of the information identified on this form are required to be submitted by the applicant and received by the Planning Division a ❑ Site Plan. The site plan must show the minimum of one (1) week prior to officially scheduling a proposed lots and/or building layouts pre-application conference date/time to allow staff ample time to drawn to scale. Also, show the location prepare for the meeting. of the subject property in relation to the nearest streets; and the locations of A pre-application conference can usually be scheduled within 1-2 driveways on the subject property and weeks of the Planning Division's receipt of the request for either across the street. Tuesday or Thursday mornings. Pre-application conferences are ❑ The Proposed Uses. one (1) hour long and are typically held between the hours of 9:00-11:00 AM. ❑ Topographic Information. Include Contour Lines if Possible. PRE-APPLICATION CONFERENCES MUST BE SCHEDULED IN ❑ If the Pre-Application Conference is for PERSON AT THE COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT COUNTER FROM a MONOPOLE project, the applicant 8:00-4:00/MONDAY-FRIDAY. must attach a copy of the letter and proof in the form of an affidavit of IF MORE THAN 4 PEOPLE ARE EXPECTED TO ATTEND THE mailing, that the collocation protocol PRE-APPLICATION CONFERENCE IN YOUR GROUP, PLEASE was completed (see Section 18.798.080 INFORM THE CITY IN ADVANCE SO THAT ALTERNATE ROOM of the Tigard Community Development ARRANGEMENTS CAN BE MADE TO ACCOMMODATE THE Code). GROUP. ❑ Filing Fee $351.00 CITY OF TIGARD 4/12/2006 • 13125 SW Hall Blvd. 3:26:40PM Tigard,Oregon 97223 TIGARD (503)639-4171 Receipt #: 27200600000000001632 Date: 04/12/2006 Line Items: Case No Tran Code Description Revenue Account No Amount Paid PRE2006-00028 [LANDUS]PreApp Conf 100-0000-438000 306.00 PRE2006-00028 [LRPF]LR Planning Surcharge 100-0000-438050 45.00 Line Item Total: $351.00 Payments: Method Payer User ID Acct./Check No. Approval No. How Received Amount Paid Check MILDREN DESIGN GROUP,P.C. ST 5877 In Person 351.00 Payment Total: $351.00 cReceipt.rpt Page 1 of 1 , June 2006 July 2008 S M T W T F S S M T W I F 1 2 3 30 31 1 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 11 12 113 114 15 16 17 I 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 1 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 25 26 27 28 29 30 I 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 Tuesday, June 13, 2006 -Pre-Apps CD Meetings Early 8:00 AM 9:00 AM 10:00 AM 11:00 AM (11:00 AM - 12:00 PM) Pre-App (Mildren Design Group 6600 SW Bonita Furniture retail change bldg. front/parking 244-0552) 12:00 PM 1:00 PM 2:00 PM 3:00 PM 4:00 PM 5:00 PM Late Tasks Notes • Shirley Treat 1 4/12/2006-3:29 PM • , April 12, 2006 MILDREN DESIGN GROUP,P.C. i Architecture • Space Planning City of Tigard o 13125 Hall Boulevard Tigard, OR RE: Paul Schatz Furniture Project Number: 106051 To Whom it May Concern: We are requesting a Pre-Application Conference for the subject located at 6600 SW Bonita Road, Tigard,Oregon. The owners of the building are considering an exterior remodel of the southern half of the building and expanded parking with storm water quality and quantity facilities. The building footprint will not be modified and the structure will continue to be used as a furniture store. The issues that we would like to discuss are: 1. Extent of required off site improvements if any. 2. Existing utilities and locations. 3. Area at southwest corner of site for water quality and detention. 4. Use of existing single driveway. 5. Fire truck access. 6. Process required in order to obtain a building permit. Thank you in advance for your information and research. Sincerel , Li' iti---- Ge e Mildren P sident/Architect I 7650 SW Beveland Street,Suite 120 Tigard,Oregon 97223 503 244 0552 Fax 503 244 0417 tl ,, • Tualatin Valley Fire & Rescue Fire Marshal's Office o(v l3/ aoo(o ? )4 2 - 000aw Date Project No. Project Name LJ� ��1�4►-Z (,'' l Tf) ►: A +/ / / Assigned Planner Olf/Aft— itt4 E<S Tualatin Valley Fire & Rescue can endorse this proposal provided the following checked items are included in the ultimate design of the project. ❑ FIRE APPARATUS ACCESS ROAD DISTANCE FROM BUILDING AND TURNAROUNDS: Access roads shall be within 150 feet of all portions of the exterior wall of the first story of the building as measured by an approved route around the exterior of the building. An approved turnaround is required if the remaining distance to an approved intersecting roadway, as measured along the fire apparatus access road, is greater than 150 feet. (IFC 503.1.1) ❑ DEAD END ROADS: Dead end fire apparatus access roads in excess of 150 feet in length shall be provided with an approved turnaround. (IFC 503.2.5) ❑ FIRE APPARATUS ACCESS ROAD EXCEPTION FOR AUTOMATIC SPRINKLER PROTECTION: When buildings are completely protected with an approved automatic fire sprinkler system, the requirements for fire apparatus access may be modified as approved by the fire code official. (IFC 503.1.1) ❑ ADDITIONAL ACCESS ROADS-COMMERCIAL: Where buildings exceed 30 feet in height or three stories in height shall have at least three separate means of fire apparatus access. Buildings or facilities having a gross area of more than 62,000 square feet shall be provided with at least two separate means of fire apparatus access. Buildings up to 124,000 square feet provided with fire sprinklers may have a single access. (IFC D104) ❑ ADDITIONAL ACCESS ROADS-ONE-OR TWO-FAMILY RESIDENTIAL: Where there are more than 30 one- or two-family dwelling units, not less than two separate approved means of access shall be provided. Where there are more than 30 dwelling units and all are protected by approved residential sprinkler systems, a single access will be allowed. (IFC D107) ❑ ADDITIONAL ACCESS ROADS- MULTIPLE-FAMILY RESIDENTIAL: Where there are more than 100 multiple-family dwelling units, not less than two separate approved means of access shall be provided. Projects up to 200 dwelling units that are protected by approved residential sprinkler systems may have a single access. Projects having more than 200 dwelling units shall have two separate approved means of access regardless of whether they are equipped with fire sprinkler systems. (IFC D106) ❑AERIAL FIRE APPARATUS ACCESS: Buildings or portions of buildings or facilities exceeding 30 feet in height above the lowest level of fire department vehicle access shall be provided with approved fire apparatus access roads capable of accommodating fire department aerial apparatus. Overhead utility and power lines shall not be located within the aerial fire apparatus access roadway. Fire apparatus access roads shall have a minimum unobstructed width of 26 feet in the immediate vicinity of any building or portion of building more than 30 feet in height. At least one of the required access routes meeting this condition shall be located within a minimum of 15 feet and a maximum of 30 feet from the building,and shall be positioned parallel to one entire side of the building. (IFC D105) ❑ REMOTENESS: Where two access roads are required, they shall be placed a distance apart equal to not less than one half of the length of the maximum overall diagonal dimension of the property or area to be served, measured in a straight line between accesses. (IFC D104.3) • ❑ FIRE APPARATUS ACCESS ...JAD WIDTH AND VERTICAL CLEARANL._. Fire apparatus access roads shall have an unobstructed width of not less than 20 feet (12 feet for up to two dwelling units and accessory buildings), and an unobstructed vertical clearance of not less than 13 feet 6 inches. Where fire apparatus roadways are less than 26 feet wide, "NO PARKING" signs shall be installed on both sides of the roadway and in turnarounds as needed. Where fire apparatus roadways are more than 28 feet wide but less than 32 feet wide, "NO PARKING" signs shall be installed on one side of the roadway and in turnarounds as needed. Where fire apparatus roadways are 32 feet wide or more, parking is not restricted. (IFC 503.2.1) ❑ FIRE APPARATUS ACCESS ROADS WITH FIRE HYDRANTS: Where a fire hydrant is located on a fire apparatus access road, the minimum road width shall be 26 feet. (IFC D103.1) ❑ TURNOUTS: When any fire apparatus access road exceeds 400 feet in length, turnouts 10 feet wide and 30 feet long shall be provided in addition to the required road width and shall be placed no more than 400 feet apart, unless otherwise approved by the fire code official. These distances may be adjusted based on visibility and light distances. (IFC 503.2.2) 81NO PARKING SIGNS: Where fire apparatus roadways are not of sufficient width to accommodate parked vehicles and 20 feet of unobstructed driving surface, "No Parking"signs shall be installed on one or both sides of the roadway and in turnarounds as needed. Roads 26 feet wide or less shall be posted on both sides as a fire lane. Roads more than 26 feet wide to 32 feet wide shall be posted on one side as a fire lane. Signs shall read "NO PARKING - FIRE LANE" and shall be installed with a clear space above grade level of 7 feet. Signs shall be 12 inches wide by 18 inches high and shall have red letters on a white reflective background. (IFC D103.6) ,SURFACE AND LOAD CAPACITIES: Fire apparatus access roads shall be of an all-weather surface that is easily distinguishable from the surrounding area and is capable of supporting not less than 12,500 pounds point load (wheel load) and 75,000 pounds live load (gross vehicle weight). You may need to provide documentation from a registered engineer that the design will be capable of supporting such loading. (IFC D102.1) ❑ BRIDGES: Where a bridge or an elevated surface is part of a fire apparatus access road,the bridge shall be constructed and maintained in accordance with AASHTO Standard Specification for Highway Bridges. Bridges and elevated surfaces shall be designed for a live load sufficient to carry the imposed loads of fire apparatus.Vehicle load limits shall be posted at both entrances to bridges when required by the fire code official. Where elevated surfaces designed for emergency vehicle use are adjacent to surfaces which are not designed for such use, approved barriers, approved signs or both shall be installed and maintained when required by the fire code official. (IFC 503.2.6) ■r URNING RADIUS: The inside turning radius and outside turning radius shall be not less than 28 feet and 4 ; feet respectively, measured from the same center point. (IFC 503.2.4 & D103.3) 4/PAINTED CURBS: Where required, fire apparatus access roadway curbs shall be painted red and marked NO PARKING FIRE LANE" at approved intervals. Lettering shall have a stroke of not less than one inch wide by six inches high. Lettering shall be white on red background. (IFC 503.3) ❑ GRADE: Fire apparatus access roadway grades shall not exceed 10 percent. Intersections and turnarounds shall be level (maximum 5%)with the exception of crowning for water run-off. When fire sprinklers are installed, a maximum grade of 15% may be allowed. The approval of fire sprinklers as an alternate shall be accomplished in accordance with the provisions of ORS 455.610(5). (IFC 503.2.7 & D103.2) ❑ GATES: Gates securing fire apparatus roads shall comply with all of the following: (IFC D103.5) • Minimum unobstructed width shall be 16 feet, or two 10 foot sections with a center post or island. • Gates serving one- or two-family dwellings shall be a minimum of 12 feet in width. • Gates shall be set back at minimum of 30 feet from the intersecting roadway. • Gates shall be of the swinging or sliding type • Manual operation shall be capable by one person • Electric gates shall be equipped with a means for operation by fire department personnel • Locking devices shall be approved. COMMERCIAL BUILDINGS - REQUIRED FIRE FLOW: The required fire flow for the building shall not e ceed 3,000 gallons per minute (GPM) or the available GPM in the water delivery system at 20 psi, whichever is less as calculated using IFC, Appendix B. A worksheet for calculating the required fire flow is available from the Fire Marshal's Office. (IFC B105.2) • ❑ SINGLE FAMILY DWELLING.. REQUIRED FIRE FLOW: The minimum u.dilable fire flow for single family dwellings and duplexes served by a municipal water supply shall be 1,000 gallons per minute. If the structure(s) is (are) 3,600 square feet or larger, the required fire flow shall be determined according to IFC Appendix B. (IFC B105.1) ❑ RURAL BUILDINGS - REQUIRED FIRE FLOW: Required fire flow for rural and suburban areas in which adequate and reliable water supply systems do not exist may be calculated in accordance with National Fire Protection Association Standard 1142, 2001 Edition, when approved by the fire code official. Please contact the Fire Marshal's Office for special assistance and other requirements that may apply. (IFC B105.1.1) *FIRE HYDRANTS—COMMERCIAL BUILDINGS: Where a portion of the building is more than 400 feet from a hydrant on a fire apparatus access road, as measured in an approved route around the exterior of the building, on-site fire hydrants and mains shall be provided. This distance may be increased to 600 feet for buildings equipped throughout with an approved automatic sprinkler system. (IFC 508.5.1) ❑ FIRE HYDRANTS— ONE-AND TWO-FAMILY DWELLINGS &ACCESSORY STRUCTURES: Where a portion of a structure is more than 600 feet from a hydrant on a fire apparatus access road, as measured in an approved route around the exterior of the structure(s), on-site fire hydrants and mains shall be provided. (IFC 508.5.1) ❑ FIRE HYDRANT NUMBER AND DISTRIBUTION: The minimum number and distribution of fire hydrants available to a building shall not be less than that listed in Appendix C,Table C 105.1. Considerations for placing fire hydrants may be as follows: • Existing hydrants in the area may be used to meet the required number of hydrants as approved. Hydrants that are up to 600 feet away from the nearest point of a subject building that is protected with fire sprinklers may contribute to the required number of hydrants. • Hydrants that are separated from the subject building by railroad tracks shall not contribute to the required number of hydrants unless approved by the fire code official. • Hydrants that are separated from the subject building by divided highways or freeways shall not contribute to the required number of hydrants. Heavily traveled collector streets only as approved by the fire code official. • Hydrants that are accessible only by a bridge shall be acceptable to contribute to the required number of hydrants only if approved by the fire code official. ❑ FIRE HYDRANT DISTANCE FROM AN ACCESS ROAD: Fire hydrants shall be located not more than 15 feet from an approved fire apparatus access roadway. (IFC C102.1) ❑ REFLECTIVE HYDRANT MARKERS: Fire hydrant locations shall be identified by the installation of reflective markers. The markers shall be blue. They shall be located adjacent and to the side of the centerline of the access road way that the fire hydrant is located on. In case that there is no center line, then assume a centerline, and place the reflectors accordingly. (IFC 508.5.4) ❑ FIRE HYDRANT/FIRE DEPARTMENT CONNECTION: A fire hydrant shall be located within 100 feet of a fire department connection (FDC). Fire hydrants and FDC's shall be located on the same side of the fire apparatus access roadway. FDCs shall normally be remote except when approved by the fire code official. (IFC 912.2) 4ACCESS AND FIRE FIGHTING WATER SUPPLY DURING CONSTRUCTION: Approved fire apparatus access roadways and fire fighting water supplies shall be installed and operational prior to any combustible construction or storage of combustible materials on the site. (IFC 1410.1 & 1412.1) KNOX BOX: A Knox Box for building access is required for this building. Please contact the Fire Marshal's ffice for an order form and instructions regarding installation and placement. (IFC 506) K. tea . John K. Dalby, Deputy Fire Marshal II Tualatin Valley Fire & Rescue, North Division 14480 SW Jenkins Road Beaverton, OR 97005-1152 503-356-4700 ADDITIONAL DOCUMENTS . • Che I Gaines- RE: Paul Schatz Pa•e 1 From: "tans Stout" <LStout @tmrippey.com> To: "Cheryl Caines" <CHERYLC @tigard-or.gov>. <GENE @MDGPC.com> Date: 1/24/2007 8:24:12 AM Subject: RE: Paul Schatz Cheryl: The "TRF" on the survey is noted in the legend as a transformer. The trash is collected in a mobile container, which is currently situated in the paved area at the southwest corner of the building. When this part of the paving is connected to the new driveway around the building the container will be moved next to the landscape island where the transformer is located. Screening of the trash is not required by section 18.745.05(E)(4) since it is located in an area that is not visible from the street, public areas, or residential or commercial areas. This situation is not effected by the proposed work. Let me know if you have additional questions. Lans From: Cheryl Caines [mailto:CHERYLC @tigard-or.gov] Sent: Tuesday, January 23, 2007 2:06 PM To: GENE @MDGPC.com Cc: Lans Stout Subject: Paul Schatz Gene, I am trying to finish the Paul Schatz SDR, but have a few questions. Are there any changes proposed to the refuse collection areas or containers? Is the container marked by TRF on the civil plans? If not, then where is it located? Are these containers enclosed or screened from view? How? Do you currently have trash pick up from Pride or another garbage hauler? Are you planning to make any changes to this? Please let me know. Thank you. Cheryl Caines Assistant Planner City of Tigard (503) 718-2437 CC: "M. Ryan Wing" <ryan©mdgpc.com>, "Paul Schatz III" <ps3 @paulschatzfurniture.com> RFrtr" D MILDREN DESIGN GROUP,P.C. ARCHITECTURE • SPACE PLANNING 7650 SW Beveland Street,Suite 120 F ' 37 Tigard,Oregon 97223 Voice:503-244-0552 Fax:503-244-0417 P��CNIN��'E�ru,yHp LAJ �INEERING LETTER OF TRANSMITTAL To: City of Tigard Date: February 16,2007 Attention: Cheryl Caines Copy to: Project Name: Paul Schatz Furniture Project Number: 106051 Attached items: Description: Land Use Permit Application-On File 10 each of 13 Applicant's Statement for"Major Modification"to an Approved Site Development -On File Stamped Addressed#10 Envelopes-On File 10 each of 2 Documentary Evidence of Neighborhood Meeting-On File 10 each of 1 CWS Service Provider Letter-On File 10 each of 14 Copy of Pre-Application Conference Notes-On File 10 each of 6 Arborist Report-On File Check for filing Fee-Paid 6 each of 16 Full Size Design Review Re-Submittal-December 2006-Dated 16 February 2007 A0.1 Title Sheet A1.1 Site Plan L1.1 Planting Plan 11 each of 16 11x17 Design Review Re-Submittal-December 2006-Dated 16 February 2007 A0.1 Title Sheet A1.1 Site Plan L1.1 Planting Plan 10 each of 18 Storm Water Calculations-On File Check for Adjustment to the minimum Access Requirement-$301.00-Paid 1 each of 1 Email from Mark McGirr with Atiyeh Bros.,Inc.-Approving Revised Site Plan X For your use For approval For your review X As requested Remarks: Signed: Ryan Wing Mailed _To be picked up X Delivered via MDG Page l of l From: "Mark McGirr" <mark @atiyehbros.com> To: <ryan @mdgpc.com>, "Paul Schatz III" <ps3 @paulschatzfurniture.com>, <istout @ tmrippey.com> Cc: "Tom Marantette" <tjm @atiyehbros.com> Subject: RE: 106051 - Paul Schatz - Revised Site Plan Date: Thu, 15 Feb 200711:59:12 -0800 Thread-Index: AcdK3WB3rVaniZgjQLOic5tFc+jUcwA4R3gA Hi: I am resending this email that I prepared on 02/08. I unfortunately replied to a forwarded email, and it not reach the right parties. I apologize for the delay in formal response. Please see below: Ryan: We, Atiyeh Bros., Inc., approve the revised site plan, as attached. Thank you for your work on resolving this matter. Mark K. McGirr Executive Director of Administration and Treasurer. From: Atiyeh Bros., Inc. [mailto:retail @atiyehbros.com] Sent: Wednesday, February 07, 2007 9:28 AM To: mark @atiyehbros.com Subject: Fw: 106051 - Paul Schatz - Revised Site Plan Original Message From: M. Ryan Wing To: david @atiyehbros.com ; ps3 @paulschatzfurniture.com Cc: (stout @tmrippey.com ; Gene Mildren Sent: Wednesday, February 07, 2007 9:18 AM Subject: 106051 - Paul Schatz- Revised Site Plan Gentlemen, attached is a pdf file of the revised Site Plan. Wanted to make sure that this revision meets everyone's needs. Please reply to this email with your approval as well as any additional comments. Please let me know if you have any questions or require additional information. Thanks. M. Ryan Wing Mildren Design Group P.C. 7650 S.W. Beveland, Suite 120 Tigard, Oregon 97223-8692 503-244-0552, voice 503-244-0417, fax ryan@mdgpc.com about:blank 2007-02-16 . .... PAUL SCHATZ FURNITURE AL..................... MILDREN DESIGN GROUP,P.C. AKC1411t_10.E • SPACE PLANNING 7650 S.W.Beveland,Suite 120 Tigard.Oregon 97223-8692 1503)244-0552 TIGtARD, OR/ GONI Owner: PAUL SCHATZ III 6600 SW BONITA RD. TIGARD, OREGON 97224 Project Contacts: •vittiglitir", ARCHITECT: LANDSCAPE ARCHITECT (� Mildren Design Group, P.C. Viridian Environmental Design, LLC 7850 S.W. BEVELAND STREET 813 S.W. ALDER, MEZZANINE B OF kr" SUITE 120 PORTLAND,OREGON 97205 PORTLAND, OREGON 97223 VOICE 503-222-1639 FAX: 503-222-1853 OwnPORTLAND, VOICE 503-244-0552 FAX 503-244-0417 CONTACT PERSON: MIKE O'BRIEN Paul CONTACT PERSON: GENE MILDREN MOBRIENOVEDLLC.COM GENEOMOGPC.COM Schatz III CIVIL ENGINEER/PANNING: T. M. Rippey Consulting Engineers 7650 S.W. BEVEAND STREET SUITE 100 6600 SW Bonita Rd Tigard,Oregon 97224 VICAR:, OREGON 97223 Sheet Index VOICE: 503-443-3900 FAX: 503-443-3700 CONTACT PERSON: KARL KOROCH (CIVIL) A0.1 COVER SHEET Project: CONTACT PERSON: LANS STOUT(PLANNING) SURVEY Paul CI.O GRADING PLAN Schatz C2.0 UTILITY PLAN C3.0 DETAILS Furniture C4.0 EROSION CONTROL PLAN C4.1 EROSION CONTROL DETAILS T1.0 TREE PLAN T1.1 TREE PLAN DETAILS 6600 SW Bonita Rd L1.I PLANTING PLAN Tigard,Oregon 97224 L1.2 PLANTING PLAN A1.1 SITE PLAN Site Analysis BUILDING EXPANSION A1.2 SITE PLAN AND DETAILS Sheet Title AREA —x--- A2.1 FLOOR PAN Cover Sheet SLIE SITE AREA- 127,122.84 SF (2.92 ACRES) _ -- - 43.1 ELEVATIONS A3.2 ELEVATIONS IMPERVIOUS ARE& AREA X COVFRAGF %COVERAGE Al101W5 •r 1 EXISTING BUILDING AREA= 39,745.54 SF 31.27% i MODIFIED BUILDING AREA- 44,491.54 SF 35.00% EXISTING PAVING AREA= 39.427.64 SF 31.02% .I'e�- MODIFIED PAVING AREA= 57,184.48 SF 44.98% TOTAL IMPERVIOUS AREA= 101,676.02 SF 79.98% 75 5/80% a� _ �_ O I ANI1NCAPF AREA %COVERAGE %COVFRAff RFOIIIRFD 1• ' Q x Jurisdictional Review notes,forms, and stamps EXISTING LANDSCAPE AREA= 47,949.66 SF= 37.72% °4"° -"5"'i" A ��.�' MODIFIED LANDSCAPE AREA= 25,424.68 SF- 20.00% 255/20% __;`� •4�' x' PARKING; „�, l_.�L, 444 PROVIDFI MIMED ��s I-':•I NK.�4 4 BULK SALES= MIN. =39,745.54/1,000= 39.75 x 1.0= 40 �� ��' a Revisions MAX. =39,74554/1,000=39.75 x 2.0= 80 !' 4 �` SALES ORIENTED= MIN. - 4,746/1,000= 4.75 x 3.7= 18 MAX. = 4,746/1,000= 4.75 x 6.2=30 =: x, TOTAL- MIN. ••• 58 MAX. = 110(PLUS ACCESSIBLE) EXISTING= 83 STALLS MODIFIED- 114 STALLS =. " SITE (5 ACCESSIBLE) "1 BICYCLE PARKING= 14 44,491.54/1,000= 44.49 x 0.3=14 I:I a 11 .a5' • =_A ` ,. ) `t?S� , .' _ MOTS RESER.,GIMP. .�w�rnrr of ie, ,i, ,r .., , ---- ! •� tt : • lil. , „ Date 16 February 2007 .t r,.,..�,� ►�i�riiiV.WissiW J I - ---- - - Drawn by: Chtx;kedby f. •r. ..i.,!♦ ..�...�...�' .....I.'i_ (0 _, ' MRW WEM '�� fill I i; , " Job Number: 106051 ilt t Key Plan BUILDING REMODEL Vicinity Map Sheet Not to Scale Not to Scale Design Review Re-Submittal - December 2006 A0.1 a �—•x� / 1 1r \tl //` ..i — 1� � �- .I' —� 74._ }. _ -- — 1.♦♦�♦ \ \♦ ♦ ♦•.r;.r•..:.•';I//I/II/I/I // I/I/ ♦♦� ♦ V'',;• °♦ , ♦\♦♦♦ , ,///�/ i, MILDREN DESIGN GROUP,P.C. ,, , , 4 Un ` /�' pw..f tom% I +IIi►���� / /� �+ � :. . ���o �� �i4V . 1 2if4.,t.OHO ARCHITECTURE 65 W.Bevel na Su 20 0 / / I rI!"rr.:►!� �U�l .�� r'ri:r .: i���",-A , ``II//�}GJ I�r -:1 // Tigard,Oregon 97223-8692 - r , ► 1503/244.05.52 i,, f� :; •/ '1 7 v i r i d i a n LEGEND ENVIRONMENTAL DESIGN al' �►'1 0 Acer rubrum'Karpick -Karpick Red Maple _ 2"cal.,B&B,Well branched,Headed at 6' Portland, .>�5 t ( ,..'-_- © eta SW NOM,AMaenlna a MI III III '■ . �` q�/7�H �► ~A� `•��: Ceradlphyllum japonicum-Katsura Tree FXe03�1863 .� %' \� "�i ���\\\\\\�yy� I I '"_'1"� �/' 2"cal.,B&B,Well branched,Headed at 6' • I / \\,- sii , �\ �i' : Calocedrus decurrens-Incense Cedar ■ �� r__ _ _ ,�„�;+�4'1 * ,I 8'B&B,Full trees,Branched to ground ,.I . • ,- . J _ = � ` 4.,C .. l —, Acer circinatum-Vine Maple MILImmosmo... 41 .* — - ' �■•• r / 10'B&B,Full trees,3 stem min.at base Parcel 2 ■,•\\\`\\\\\\\\\,, 1'` X (� 1, :�i — '�e�r/I l + `--- Existing Trees to Remain ►� tU .' _um, Farce i .1 � ;.' �__ /X Existing Trees to Be Removed .psu , /I ■ ■■� l ;���� .$':/ 0 Viburnum p.t.'Mariesii'-Doublefile Viburnum•N' u1 45 ,'o '. 3 gal.cont.,Full plants,Space as shown 1..F� P P Owner: ■ ��,' 4 © Salix purpurea nana-Dwarf Purpleosier Willow Paul llll�. ;lJ, tI'P j }L 2 gal.cont.,Full plants,Space as shown Schatz III „'1' �1� t .0' <' ( - - Viburnumdavidii-DavidVibumum . //,1 -' : , 3 gal.cont.,Full plants,Space as shown ■; 2 to 111 A�• i1 {.:,.' o--- Rhododendron'Taurus'-Rhododendron 1 { l li lI 6600 SW Bonita Rd i-_ ______:i. .1/. 30”B&B,Full plants,Space as shown �� // 6 Tigard Oregon 97224 �. II: •' 0 , z 0 ----- Fuchsia magellanica,Hardy Fuchsia 1111 r�. 3 gal.cont.,Full plants,Space as shown pro • ar.4 li O . ' ti0 Paul ul aril I �' Icy F 0---- Kalmia latifolia'Olympic Fire'-Mountain Laurel } �\ e 1► ,i i 3 gal.cont.,Full plants,Space as shown Schatz / � • �' .�/i` o II ' .• 1r firma. / w Myrica californica Pacific Waxmyrtle `���/ 1 _ �� z 3 gal.cont.,Full plants,Space as shown Furniture �t ��.�/", 4:::,... �• �j Q---- Ribes sanguineum'King Edward VII'-Red Currant i" 1 H":'= q-'�i I 3 gal.cont.,Full plants,Space as shown 6600 SW Bonita Rd 1 11 I ;1 .,:// Tigard,Oregon 97224 I °L It �il I Co 0------- - Mahonia'Compacta'-Compact Oregon Grape 1 .'I � '1 / :ro 2 gal.cont.,Full plants,Space as shown _ -- _ al 1 ... — ( p // Sheet Title 8 1 II I /i/ j//� EEEplanting ,24"o.c.© r ........... —1 I ��,..1�., �,I �' 4� P -Japanese Pachysandra Plan -emu''I:•: � � ;i-/, 1 gal.cont.,Full plants,24"o.c. 10Is,.c 7° I �'� %j/��: :.I L.: Non-irrigated Flowering Fieldgrass x+ 1 l -nj I IYI ,a[.IPyx r= 1 c 1 NOTES 1 i_ssP� ';�i/ `_� � . P:.e/ 1. All new landscape areas to be irrigated by a fully Revisions ' \ ' �= ��L� �'' automatic underground irrigation system ,�.��ti►���;O;N�,►�C..\,s' �N 2�0 �ij KEY NOTES: • -:(. :I O,__j �n11�, 1:r1:: i O Existing ground cover plantings to remain. ' '. 1 p, ■1tLIA' •: . Plant new trees and shrubs as shown on plan. 'I : `�--� ( , .s...'m' /i� O Existing trees and shrubs to remain,remove existing ground cover. }C X X �� gt. {;4 i Plant new ground cover as shown on plan. 1 � CI#0 ® rz W .7` .� // /�•- ./�I ►✓�ltil�I :Ii/+���0=��—_ +— aia`.s.csll�0.0.E. • • : ' . y . � -fib -W.• . IviII/li • + :/'//�� /.'�/�/ I/1 •� s /�Ii II _ _•� Ij�i:a" - vw/i r:1. ► PERMISSION OF WILD..DESIGN CROUP.P C Date 16 February 2007 L♦ i. • ♦ 1/•:/ li I/ :•ti► w, ='a•-.--- � I_.I �-♦ ,ems s �°i+Twi°n SE USED OR PEPIROCUOSO IN ANY - / X Drawn by: Checked by: / i ASWMEO MEO � i lk Planting Plan \ `___ -7 Job Number If6051 15 February 2007 5 70 20 40 Design Review Re-Submittal - December 2006 L1.1 • Keynotes O- - I1.X�x�_x� 2. EXISTING SIGN PEDESTAL '1/ N arzzboYI S W B O N I T A \ 2. EXPANDED PARKING AND MANUEVERINC AREA ,� N .SEE SHEET A1.2 '� 3. EXPANDED LANDSCAPE AREA 4. NEW/EXPANDED SIDEWALK, TYPICAL en j3 N 85•12'55•E 110.34' , .M+— _-^'w _ N 8738 00 E 31,.00 i� C� RAMP _era 5 NEW ACCESSIBLE SIDEWALK RAM MILDREN DESIGN GROUP,P.C.. i ,�+-�— N.\.. � ���� f:+s 6. RELOCATE EXISTING LIGIITPOLE 1'CxITEC'1'UR SPACE PIANNIN 4 C A x� 1 ' �T- -. �M�+ ' "�' J 8. REMOVE E%ISITNC CUR& TWICAL 7650 S.W.[3eccland,Su lte 120 vie�/ �� — N_ y.,,- - - Tao, - 9. EXISTING SIDEWALK ENTRY TO REMAIN Tigard.Oregon 97223-8692 — — — •1 I - - -- - -- _-- _--- - - --- -- --- 7 t0.NEW FACADE OVER E%IST EXISTING CONCRETE TILT WALL. SEE ELEVATIONS 15031244-0a52 N W26'101 MOW T I ON SHEET A3.1 FOR ADDITIONAL INFORMATION n 44. 4,_ I p N 12.REMOVE EXISTING STAIR AND GUARDRAIL • n R tierr`' — �� N 2e,o r loR.2a• $ R'._ © © © II 13.NEW STAIR AND GUARDRAIL 0i_ 510'(6 EOUAPSPACES) 60'-6'(7 EQUAL SPACES) 0I•' II 14.BUILDING EXPANSION,SEE ELEVATIONS ON SHEET A3.2 FOR ADDITIONAL _ _ _ ___ INFORMATION __ S Itraobot 1ao.00' ___ 54'-0'(6 AT 9'-0') J6'-0'(4 AT 9'-0') Ss'-0'(B AT 8'-0') _I z --- -- ---- -- r--�--w . 15 NEW ACCESSIBLE PARKING STALL -i-BXNf'LO]z'LS18y- ---i I I 16.NEW VAN ACCESSIBLE PARKING STALL rr 4 ''..e.. I 17 EXISTING TREE TO BE REMOVED .� i� 7---- — \4e4>dY4j, 0 6'-0' I i 2Y-0'(7 AT 9'-0') _ 18.REMOVE EXISTING CONCRETE PAD ±____.____.__________._______ .....__ - .. �• ,e - 8"4--49 D E \'-..-_9. e I 9'-0' 9•_0• °' 6•_0- 9•_D• g•_0• 18'-0-(2 AT 9'-0') .� p 19.NEW 30'UGHTPOLE WITH 250 MH CUTOFF LUMINAIRE • __ --- `�- \ I 1— -... -s, -- - - -57'- 6i' 9'-0') © 20.NEW WALL MOUNTED 250 NH CUTOFF LUMINAIRE - I 'O r 5'-6 u 21.NEW WALL MOUNTED 250 MH DECORATIVE FIXTURE Ill• 11�..11ag llititna �Q 20.00 \\ =y ` I � \ © II o 11111Mr-1711 0 o- _, , 7 N ,• I �� �1� 3 ® I o p� Curb Types �y.FD S� / \\ `I O ,,•--- -- - , 4��.+. �Y % _----- EXISTING CURB TO BE REMOVED ,?�� OS . j .. I SEW VO�„ DOLL ERIN\\\\\\\\�\\\\\ L_P._``.1 ,., ":_f_t . .___ EXTRUDED CONCRETE CURB �• 7 N �IR Parcel 2 � � 1�.%�i s -CEO 7P, I CAST IN PLACE CONCRETE CURB 9,4,o, 00 a �I Parcel 1 I1� z i �e `p m • i trill�SIlu ii \��` ° Owner b ; p a 111" BUILDING '�S .-.r.. . Paul EXISTING 1 p I EXPANSION III ©0 II o Schatz III BUILDING p ai1l � 4,746 SF ' IN a ,��■ FF 178.28 ® tl .El I M FF■173.60 a — © e ��— .� o v M 6600 SW Bonita Rd El O �' b a Tigard.Oregon 97224 MI IIII a • o �KlI 14 I� 0 1 2 Project, �i A till �r EXISTING - ., a ; a Paul g �® BUILDING ' Schatz ® 39,745 SF �• 'L� I$ , Furniture - - .ate 0 -= I 3 �A - 11I'I_ 11!,T-0' 0 1 1C d' 11_) 6600 SW Bonet Rd ' in 15'-6- a 26'-0' e h A Tigard,Oregon 97224 �Iwn•� < r fl -- ,A r 1 �°I I r_ o II Q a 1 11pV10W I al o ° I I Sheet Title: I- O` ® m ; I ite lan `at I , ® ^ j inl.' '�i�—� I o r r '111 ■ 9�� L I ' I' _,..1 INIIIIIIIIIIIMI {/ p 8 j -, —.— `% Re,nlnne . m , o' ■IIII a --_. FF-183.30 sub. ", 1 Z N Kr29'57'E 100.00' \ sum m • _ • _ • 0 r 0• :• --' % 2 , x 1 CITY ,�F CIGII►f-NC) Pl..�.^1NNIP*3 DIVISION iii ( V ,P,.., �. , •• 1 jr,' r $ }r1,oxw ©t \\ • / t 1 4S Da'(5 A7 ' \ __ - _ - _ RIGA.n DESIGN anus.P.C..2a4,.ALL _ p BY DATE -E__ N �..._N.THE PROPERTY a FF \ ►r °�` � _ MDREH ec usnnmoolm M ANY OR ��� 12 Al 8 4 - - - ®i �RRB, o"w°asswN 'uunuN O.'100Aaa•1piT.'o.c Or 20 '� .i� � /�'�'• /� � O f - 22 © % Date 16 February 2007 �' c -• #20 �. "—tip.-' O - -- - - �a\ ,4�, to S11, ocwrr �,,,.i , - Drawn by: Checked by:OP A d 01111M _ MRW WEM \ S 89'38'48YW 400.99' Job Number: 106051 $ II Site Plan S I" i Sheet $ O 510 20 40 Design Review Re-Submittal - December 2006 A1.1 Cheryi.Caines- RE: Paul Schatz Page 1 From: "Paul Schatz III" <ps3 @paulschatzfurniture.com> To: "'Cheryl Caines"' <CHERYLC @tigard-or.gov> Date: 2/26/2007 1:23:32 PM Subject: RE: Paul Schatz Hi Cheryl, 30-day extension is ok. Thanks Paul Original Message From: Cheryl Caines [mailto:CHERYLC @tigard-or.gov] Sent: Monday, February 26, 2007 8:38 AM To: LStout @tmrippey.com Cc: GENE @mdgpc.com; ps3 @paulschatzfurniture.com Subject: RE: Paul Schatz Lans, I think we only need a 30-day extension. Cheryl >>> "Lans Stout" <LStout @tmrippey.com> 02/26 8:28 AM >>> How much time do we need? This really needs to come from Paul, so if you let me know about the time frame, I'll send him an e-mail to approve and pass on to you. Lans From: Cheryl Caines [mailto:CHERYLC @tigard-or.gov] Sent: Monday, February 26, 2007 8:24 AM To: Lans Stout Subject: RE: Paul Schatz No. I've only seen one or two and they just asked for the extension with an amount of time stated. An e-mail would work also if that would be more convenient for you. Thank you. Cheryl ,Ch= j Gaines- RE: Paul Schatz Pa•e 2 >» "Cans Stout" <LStout©tmrippey.com> 02/26 6:46 AM >>> Cheryl, do you have a standard format for the letter? Lans From Cheryl Caines [mailto:CHERYLC©tigard-or.gov] Sent Friday, February 23, 2007 1:46 PM To: GENE©mdgpc.com; Lans Stout Subject: Paul Schatz Gene and Lans, I've reviewed the revisions to the Paul Schatz development and the decision will be issued on Monday. I noticed that the 120 day clock is 4/14/07. Could you please grant a 30 day extension? I don't think this project will be appealed, but the middle of April is not that far out. Thank you, Cheryl Caines Assistant Planner City of Tigard (503) 718-2437 6/15/2007 CITY OF TIGARD 4:27:02PM 13125 SW Hall Blvd. TIGARD Tigard,OR 97223 (503)639-4171 Conditions Associated With Case #: SDR2006-00008 Project Name: PAUL SCHATZ FURNITURE MAJ. MOD UP # DESCRIPTION STATUS* DATE TA"T"US BY DATE 1411111114 I SUBMIT A REVISED LANDSCAPE PLAN M 6/15/2007 CAC 6/15/2007 CAC 1. Prior to site work the applicant must submit a revised landscape plan for review and approval that shows street trees along SW Bonita Road as 3 inch caliper per I8.530.050.B. plan LI • I 2 PAY A MITIGATION FEE N CAC 3/21/2007 MSB 2. Prior to commencing site work,the applicant shall pay a mitigation fee-in-lieu for the value of 26.25 caliper inches(26.25 x$125=$3,281.25). 3 INSTALL ALL PROPOSED TREE PROTECT N CAC 3/21/2007 MSB 3. Tree Protection-Prior to any site work the applicant shall install all proposed tree protection fencing. The fencing shall be inspected and approved by the Project Arborist and City Planner,Cheryl Caines,prior to commencing any site work. The tree protection fencing shall remain in place through the duration of all of the building construction phases,until the Certificate of Occupancy has been approved. 4 SITE PLANS MUST SHOW TREE PLANS M 6/15/2007 CAC 6/15/2007 CAC 4. Prior to issuance of building permits,the applicant shall submit site plan drawings indicating the location of the trees that were preserved on the lot during site development, location of tree protection fencing,and a signature of approval from the project arborist regarding the placement and construction techniques to be employed in building the structures. All proposed protection fencing shall be installed and inspected prior to commencing construction. The fencing shall remain in place through the duration of all of the building construction phases,until the Certificate of Occupancy has been approved. After approval from City Staff,the tree protection measures may be removed. On b u 1 l d in, p Qom i I- 5/k p/en . 5 ON GOING MNT PLAN FOR LANDSCAPE N CAC 3/21/2007 MSB 5. Prior to building permit issuance,the applicant shall provide documentation of an adequate on-going maintenance program for the landscape areas. 6 SCREENING PLAN M 6/15/2007 CAC 6/15/2007 CAC 6. Submit a detailed plan for review and approval that shows all new service facilities including air conditioning units, HVAC,and gas meters,are screened from public view. S 4-11-, A- 3 . I 7 PLAN FOR DUMPSTERS M 6/15/2007 CAC 6/15/2007 CAC 7. Submit detailed plans for review and approval that shows the location of the two small dumpsters used for trash collection. If screening is required, it must be shown on the plans. 5.e Q a f{ucJn t 1€ 8 PLAN FOR ONE-WAY DRIVE M 6/15/2007 CAC 6/15/2007 CAC 8. Prior to issuance of building/site permits,the applicant shall submit plans for review and approval that show the direction of flow and signage details for the one-way access drive. 5-eR, Pc I . I 4, A I . 3 9 NUMBER OF LONG-TERM PKG SPACES M 6/15/2007 CAC 6/15/2007 CAC 9. Prior to issuance of building/site permits,the applicant shall submit information stating the number of long-term parking spaces being provided. If this number exceeds 20,then a revised site plan must be submitted for review and approval that shows how the carpool/vanpool parking standards are met. ,c.e t t1kc chu.{ Ie r 10 BIKE RACK PLAN M 6/15/2007 CAC 6/15/2007 CAC 10. Provide a detail of the bike racks to be used for review and approval by the City. 11 BI-WKLY ARBORIST REPORTS N CAC 3/21/2007 MSB 11. Prior to any Certificates of Occupancy,the applicant shall ensure that the Project Arborist has submitted written reports to the Planning Department(Cheryl Caines),at least,once every two weeks,from initial tree protection zone(TPZ)fencing installation,through the building construction phases,as he monitors the construction activities and progress. This inspection will be to evaluate the tree protection fencing,determine if the fencing was moved at any point during construction,and determine if any part of the Tree Protection Plan has been violated. These reports must be provided to the City until the time of the issuance of any Certificates of Occupancy. The reports shall include any changes that occurred to the TPZ as well as the condition and location of the tree protection fencing. If the amount of TPZ was reduced then the Project Arborist shall justify why the fencing was moved,and shall certify that the construction activities to the trees did not adversely impact the Ping-CaseConditions.rpt Page 1 of 3 Paul Schatz Furniture City of Tigard file SDR 2006-00008 conditions of approval compliance for building permit submittal and issuance: Conditions prior to permit issuance, Planning Division 1. The landscape plan has been revised to indicate 3-inch caliper street trees. 2. A check for the tree removal fee-in-lieu will be submitted prior to permit issuance. 3. The contractor will install tree protection as shown on the approved plan. 4. The signed tree protection plan is included in the permit submittal. 5. A copy of the owner's contract for landscape maintenance will be submitted prior to permit issuance. 6. The roof top mechanical units are to be painted to match the building fascia. There are no exterior ground mounted units. 7. The trash containers will be kept inside the building. No enclosure is proposed. 8. Sign details have been added to the drawings. 9. There is no designated long term employee parking, so there is no allocation required for carpool/vanpool spaces. 10. The bike racks are shown on sheet A1.3. 11. The project arborist will be contracted to perform the required reports, which will be submitted prior to occupancy. Conditions prior to permit issuance, Engineering Division: 12. The PFI permit has been submitted. 13. The PFI permit application includes the required information. 14. The ODOT permit will be provided to the City prior to building permit issuance. 15. An address has been requested. 16. A sight distance certification will be submitted prior to issuance of the building permit. 17. See note 14 above. 18. See note 14 above. 19. Design and calculations for the water quality facility have been submitted to Engineering. 20. An erosion control plan is included as sheets C4.0 and C4.1 21. The documents have been submitted to TVF&R. The remaining conditions apply to items required prior to occupancy. 1 f MILDREN DESIGN GROUP,P.C. ARCHITECTURE • SPACE PLANNING 7650 SW Beveland Street,Suite 120 RECEIVED Tigard,Oregon 97223 Voice:503-244-0552 Fax:503-244-0417 `3 2007 JUN 1 LETTER OF TRANSMITTAL CITY OI='i iGARD \NNINGIENGItiEERING To: City of Tigard Date: June 13,2007 Attention: Planning Department Attn:Cheryl Copy to: Project Name: Paul Schatz Furniture(Thomasville) Project Number: 106051 Attached items: Description: 1 each of 32(30x42) Permit Submittal-(A0.1,Survey,A1.1,C1.0,C2.0,C3.0,C4.0,C4.1,T1.0,T1.1,L1.1, L2.1,A1.2, A1.3,A2.1.0, A2.1.1, A2.1.2,A2.4.1, A3.1, A4.1, A4.2, A4.3,A5.1, A5.2, A5.3,A5.4,S1.1,S2.1,S2.2,S3.1,S4.1,S5.1) 1 each of 1 Compliance Letter For your use X For approval For your review _ As requested Remarks: Signed: Ryan Wing Mailed _To be picked up X Delivered via MDG P:\106051\wP\U-COT-9.wpd 80 /4 ,Q004:3- 00 ° 0S r 'j Landscapers, Inc. Cauwnitted To Excellence 4-4471-- :41 "Ylaf-y 4 12 5c s eo ; £/or, 0.1 - 460%, 9,14,(41,^1-r /41, 1 C-orivfrapyy j• /..ror? y.dfor 6y--ka hie coil nwc ets,1 333 S. State St., Suite 177 • Lake Oswego, Oregon 97034 • (503) 635-2506 $ ':01 LOl1Z OZ hl1IP(03M) Fany d 3L9b£005£9 '0N/£l:£l '1S/£l :£l LOOZ OZ Nflf(G3M) 3df11INai13 Z1d-IOS 1f1Vd WOd3 6/22/2007 IL CITY OF TIGARD 7:59: A 7:59:01 1AM r `13125 SW Hall Blvd. \I/Tigard,OR 97223 (503)639-4171 Conditions Associated With Case#: SDR2006-00008 Project Name: PAUL SCHATZ FURNITURE MAJ. MOD # DESCRIPTION STATUS* STATUS DATE S* DATE BY ( DATE BY 1 SUBMIT A REVISED LANDSCAPE PLAN M 6/15/2007 CAC 6/15/2007 CAC 1. Prior to site work the applicant must submit a revised landscape plan for review and approval that shows street trees along SW Bonita Road as 3 inch caliper per I8.530.050.B. 2 PAY A MITIGATION FEE M 6/18/2007 CAC 6/19/2007 MSB 2. Prior to commencing site work,the applicant shall pay a mitigation fee-in-lieu for the value of 26.25 caliper inches(26.25 x$125=$3,281.25). 3 INSTALL ALL PROPOSED TREE PROTECT N CAC 3/21/2007 MSB 3. Tree Protection-Prior to any site work the applicant shall install all proposed tree protection fencing. The fencing shall be inspected and approved by the Project Arborist and City Planner,Cheryl Caines,prior to commencing any site work. The tree protection fencing shall remain in place through the duration of all of the building construction phases,until the Certificate of Occupancy has been approved. 4 SITE PLANS MUST SHOW TREE PLANS M 6/15/2007 CAC 6/15/2007 CAC 4. Prior to issuance of building permits,the applicant shall submit site plan drawings indicating the location of the trees that were preserved on the lot during site development,location of tree protection fencing,and a signature of approval from the project arborist regarding the placement and construction techniques to be employed in building the structures. All proposed protection fencing shall be installed and inspected prior to commencing construction. The fencing shall remain in place through the duration of all of the building construction phases,until the Certificate of Occupancy has been approved. After approval from City Staff,the tree protection measures may be removed. 5 ON GOING MNT PLAN FOR LANDSCAPE M 7/21/2007 CAC 6/22/2007 CAC 5. Prior to building permit issuance,the applicant shall provide documentation of an adequate on-going maintenance program for the landscape areas. 6 SCREENING PLAN M 6/15/2007 CAC 6/15/2007 CAC 6. Submit a detailed plan for review and approval that shows all new service facilities including air conditioning units, HVAC,and gas meters,are screened from public view. 7 PLAN FOR DUMPSTERS M 6/15/2007 CAC 6/15/2007 CAC 7. Submit detailed plans for review and approval that shows the location of the two small dumpsters used for trash collection. If screening is required,it must be shown on the plans. 8 PLAN FOR ONE-WAY DRIVE M 6/15/2007 CAC 6/15/2007 CAC 8. Prior to issuance of building/site permits,the applicant shall submit plans for review and approval that show the direction of flow and signage details for the one-way access drive. 9 NUMBER OF LONG-TERM PKG SPACES M 6/15/2007 CAC 6/15/2007 CAC 9. Prior to issuance of building/site permits,the applicant shall submit information stating the number of long-term parking spaces being provided. If this number exceeds 20,then a revised site plan must be submitted for review and approval that shows how the carpool/vanpool parking standards are met. 10 BIKE RACK PLAN M 6/15/2007 CAC 6/15/2007 CAC 10. Provide a detail of the bike racks to be used for review and approval by the City. 11 BI-WKLY ARBORIST REPORTS N CAC 3/21/2007 MSB 11. Prior to any Certificates of Occupancy,the applicant shall ensure that the Project Arborist has submitted written reports to the Planning Department(Cheryl Caines),at least,once every two weeks,from initial tree protection zone(TPZ)fencing installation,through the building construction phases,as he monitors the construction activities and progress. This inspection will be to evaluate the tree protection fencing,determine if the fencing was moved at any point during construction,and determine if any part of the Tree Protection Plan has been violated. These reports must be provided to the City until the time of the issuance of any Certificates of Occupancy. The reports shall include any changes that occurred to the TPZ as well as the condition and location of the tree protection fencing. If the amount of TPZ was reduced then the Project Arborist shall justify why the fencing was moved,and shall certify that the construction activities to the trees did not adversely impact the Ping-CaseConditions.rpt Page 1 of 3 Att, RECF1 VED JUN 21 2007 ;j Landscapers, Inc. P CITyOP�I Committed To Excellence LANNING�Flkf 111I�ERING 4.44,71, /kg sc� s p c. „ acovN-74i„,",4- /7 ce,o ` -C-427v.'cam Aovi 333 S. State St., Suite 177 • Lake Oswego, Oregon 97034 • (503) 635-2506 1 $t:01 ION OZ 4fli(03M) P?n! *ay d 9L5ti£005£9 'ON/£l:£l '1S/E l :E l /ON OZ NU(03M) 38f111Na0i Z1VHOS lflVd Woad CITY OF TIGARD 6/18/2007 13125 SW Hall Blvd. 4:31:48PM Tigard,OR 97223 503.639.4171 T[GARD Receipt #: 27200700000000002778 Date: 06/18/2007 Line Items: Case No Tran Code Description Revenue Account No Amount Paid SDR2006-00008 [TREES]Tree Replacement 225-0000-417000 3,281.25 Line Item Total: $3,281.25 Payments: Method Payer User ID Acct./Check No. Approval No. Dow Received Amount Paid Check PACA PROPERTIES LLC KJP 1244 In Person 3,281.25 Payment Total: $3,281.25 cReceipt.rpt Page 1 of 1 CITY OF TIGARD 9:28:4 o7 5AM 9:28:4 13125 SW Hall Blvd. Tigard,OR 97223 (503)639-4171 Conditions Associated With Case#: SDR2006-00008 Project Name: PAUL SCHATZ FURNITURE MAJ. MOD CURRENT ik STATUS I UPDATED r 116114111111.# DESCRIPTION STATUS* DATES ig l' DATE B 1 SUBMIT A REVISED LANDSCAPE PLAN M 6/15/2007 CAC 6/15/2007 CAC 1. Prior to site work the applicant must submit a revised landscape plan for review and approval that shows street trees along SW Bonita Road as 3 inch caliper per 18.530.050.B. 2 PAY A MITIGATION FEE M 6/18/2007 CAC 6/19/2007 MSB 2. Prior to commencing site work,the applicant shall pay a mitigation fee-in-lieu for the value of 26.25 caliper inches(26.25 x$125=$3,281.25). 3 INSTALL ALL PROPOSED TREE PROTECT M 6/22/2007 CAC 6/22/2007 CAC 3. Tree Protection-Prior to any site work the applicant shall install all proposed tree protection fencing. The fencing shall be inspected and approved by the Project Arborist and City Planner,Cheryl Caines,prior to commencing any site work. The tree protection fencing shall remain in place through the duration of all of the building construction phases,until the Certificate of Occupancy has been approved. 4 SITE PLANS MUST SHOW TREE PLANS M 6/15/2007 CAC 6/15/2007 CAC 4. Prior to issuance of building permits,the applicant shall submit site plan drawings indicating the location of the trees that were preserved on the lot during site development, location of tree protection fencing,and a signature of approval from the project arborist regarding the placement and construction techniques to be employed in building the structures. All proposed protection fencing shall be installed and inspected prior to commencing construction. The fencing shall remain in place through the duration of all of the building construction phases,until the Certificate of Occupancy has been approved. After approval from City Staff,the tree protection measures may be removed. 5 ON GOING MNT PLAN FOR LANDSCAPE M 7/21/2007 CAC 6/22/2007 CAC 5. Prior to building permit issuance,the applicant shall provide documentation of an adequate on-going maintenance program for the landscape areas. 6 SCREENING PLAN M 6/15/2007 CAC 6/15/2007 CAC 6. Submit a detailed plan for review and approval that shows all new service facilities including air conditioning units, HVAC,and gas meters,are screened from public view. 7 PLAN FOR DUMPSTERS M 7/10/2007 CAC 7/9/2007 CAC 7. Submit detailed plans for review and approval that shows the location of the two small dumpsters used for trash collection. If screening is required,it must be shown on the plans. 8 PLAN FOR ONE-WAY DRIVE M 6/15/2007 CAC 6/15/2007 CAC 8. Prior to issuance of building/site permits,the applicant shall submit plans for review and approval that show the direction of flow and signage details for the one-way access drive. 9 NUMBER OF LONG-TERM PKG SPACES M 6/15/2007 CAC 6/15/2007 CAC 9. Prior to issuance of building/site permits,the applicant shall submit information stating the number of long-term parking spaces being provided. If this number exceeds 20,then a revised site plan must be submitted for review and approval that shows how the carpool/vanpool parking standards are met. 10 BIKE RACK PLAN M 6/15/2007 CAC 6/15/2007 CAC 10. Provide a detail of the bike racks to be used for review and approval by the City. 11 BI-WKLY ARBORIST REPORTS N CAC 3/21/2007 MSB 11. Prior to any Certificates of Occupancy,the applicant shall ensure that the Project Arborist has submitted written reports to the Planning Department(Cheryl Caines),at least,once every two weeks,from initial tree protection zone(TPZ)fencing installation,through the building construction phases,as he monitors the construction activities and progress. This inspection will be to evaluate the tree protection fencing,determine if the fencing was moved at any point during construction,and determine if any part of the Tree Protection Plan has been violated. These reports must be provided to the City until the time of the issuance of any Certificates of Occupancy. The reports shall include any changes that occurred to the TPZ as well as the condition and location of the tree protection fencing. If the amount of TPZ was reduced then the Project Arborist shall justify why the fencing was moved,and shall certify that the construction activities to the trees did not adversely impact the Ping-CaseConditions.rpt Page 1 of 3 'awl Caines- re: Fwd: Re: 106051 - Paul Schatz- Landscape Maintenance Pa.e 1 From: M.Ryan Wing <ryan @mdgpc.com> To: "Cheryl Caines" <CHERYLC @tigard-or.gov> Date: 7/9/2007 12:09:12 PM Subject: re: Fwd: Re: 106051 - Paul Schatz- Landscape Maintenance Cheryl, per our telephone conversation and a conversation I had with Paul Schatz the dumpsters will be relocated to offsite warehouse. The trash and recycling will be kept in trash cans in the building and wheeled out on pickup days. Thanks. Maris, are there any additional items we need to satisfy to get the permits issued? M. Ryan Wing Mildren Design Group P.C. 7650 S.W. Beveland, Suite 120 Tigard, Oregon 97223-8692 503-244-0552, voice 503-244-0417, fax ryan @mdgpc.com On Monday, 09 July, 2007 8:34 AM, Cheryl Caines wrote: Date: Mon, 09 Jul 2007 08:34:09 -0700 From Cheryl Caines To: Subject: Fwd: Re: 106051 - Paul Schatz- Landscape Maintenance Ryan, I have never gotten an answer or sign-off from Pride on this. I'll need these questions answered prior to permits being issued. Cheryl >>> Cheryl Caines 06/22 2:48 PM »> Ryan and Lans, I was at the site to inspect the tree protection fencing. That looks good and the condition is signed off. One question about the dumpsters for the business (not the construction dumpsters). The letter from Lans stated that the dumpsters will be inside the building. Where will the dumpsters be? Did Pride disposal sign off on the new location? How will they be getting access to the dumpsters? Can you please let me know? Thank you, Cheryl >» M.Ryan Wing <ryan @mdgpc.com> 06/21 10:30 AM >>> Cheryl, attached is a pdf file of a letter from the Landscaper for the Paul Schatz Project. Please let me know if you need any additional information. Thanks. M. Ryan Wing Mildren Design Group P.C. 7650 S.W. Beveland, Suite 120 Tigard, Oregon 97223-8692 503-244-0552, voice 503-244-0417, fax ryan @mdgpc.com -�. w._ 512. ao oo0o8 I Cheryl Caines- re: Paul Schatz AA, Saki a a. Page 1 From: M.Ryan Wing <ryan @mdgpc.com> To: "Cheryl Caines" <CHERYLC @tigard-or.gov> Date: 10/3/2007 3:36:52 PM Subject: re: Paul Schatz Cheryl, attached is a pdf file showing how we are going to comply with the Landscape %. We have added to the Landscape Island just North of the Thomasville dock and deleted some sidewalk at the front of Thomasville and at the South of the Building Addition. As we discussed we will be applying for a minor modification for these changes and the changes to the Building Addition. Please let me know if this is sufficient to release the Building Permit for the Building Addition. Let me know if you have any questions or require additional information. Thanks. Signed: M. Ryan Wing Mildren Design Group P.C. 7650 S.W. Beveland, Suite 120 Tigard, Oregon 97223-8692 503-244-0552, voice 503-244-0417, fax ryan©mdgpc.com On Wednesday, 03 October, 2007 10:47 AM, Cheryl Caines wrote: Date: Wed, 03 Oct 2007 10:47:31 -0700 From: Cheryl Caines To: Subject: Paul Schatz Ryan, I noticed on the building plans for Paul Schatz that the landscaping has been changed. The minimum requirement is 20% (a reduction from the typical 25%). During the land use process it was determined that this requirement was barely met. By reducing the landscaping (I estimated about 750 feet), the percentage is now below the required 20%. Please let me know how you would like to resolve this issue. The site is overparked for the minimum requirement. It may be possible to modify the plan or just go back to the original landscape plan. Cheryl Caines Associate Planner City of Tigard (503) 718-2437 CC: "Dan Nelson" <DanN @tigard-or.gov>, "Mark VanDomelen" <MARKV @tigard-or.gov>, <ps3©paulschatzfurniture.com>, Gene Mildren <gene @mdgpc.com> PA UL t`� �5 n 1 I � i UN 1N1flLTUll l?I' l _r•■--- 1105.6 0077.6.1.4 477 674 447,7 776 5077 u PHASE fl e THOMASVLL.E TIGARDD, OREGON *NO OCCUPANCY UNDER THIS PERMIT Deferred Submittals Owner - �,..,rm,�.,,,w6 PACA Properties, LLC ,.� •,w 7744 706.7 NUM.777 717 Project Contacts _ __ Special Inspections mccr mcr p' MBdren Design Group, P.C. Vkidion Environmen toi Design,LLC n x..a 777 w r.c.m a 77 46 .,a Structural Observation 47 777 70 741 4•1 IMMO 1777 77 77072 7 10-27-77 7771 max 7 77 07779 7.761 77 77 101.1700 1071107 77777 � Sheet Index mat T.M.Rap eey Consulting Engineers PACA ,..e, � Properties LLC 711 Mil OD 770 77 7.67.007 947 00 717,70 77 77790.wa tit 7m 191741 nwn..r..nr ... TO mix road �,�..v,a,1717, r,,.,,,.,,.,.., 7770 rn"z. 714 MO 77 777 6.000 7447 .e0 ".. Paul Schatz Furniture- ,a:ttt, ThomasvJk 7 77 ; � Code Analysis Location . :,.., `"- " 477 7.e,0.0,e.,.no-....,0 0,,,,,..:e,,m. ,...r,,....._...a.,va .r.....,en,. 7 NM 077 7 7 777 7 77711077 0777.777.4774764 17 _./,.,1717 1717.,. mr«4,..011.0..u...7 77 U, ,..1700 007 6.1177 7 17 7014.701.7711.79 PP OC 77 I41 707.I 67 777 7,667 fQ' Cover Sheet 17767174/0 .7=77•[47 144 c�,47 7•7.7922424. 7.„4,,,:A, 7/-”7 m. • - .f„am.Nw1.0.0 o.,../../ Zoning . =- plan”1'' ,...sa._._... .n:,MILL 1717 ,1717,v.,mr.9. 747 67777 777 a ses 4174 67-0707 71.1.7 7 7 7011 771070.17 0.9 017,771.011711 77 6.11.70 214174d1=4617C Mr 7102027 077 lee 7707 1174 707 ::'4 744 017 471747 171.17.713772 1776 7 077 704-0.TR 7 777 77 '4;p _ y�4 p6.00 rm.at 747 70 670 00 7 770 6714-0-KR osc 7767,e., Site Analysis : 1717 1717. ,a .�.,.�.n mn� _ �,�.�.,.» ,.. . a`0=15 4.111767 777 TO 17 77 OP KM C1077 7 Of 77 77177 66777 F: _: z . *L --. taw 1! );17:17" 97 a ED KI7 flan Ycnity Map ,1717... m 1717,is '." Permit Submittal-May 2007 A0.1 t Keynotes O'— 43333e MIMS Seems Tee.. ... . . SW BONIITAA f ...,....,...a MI I ..o�.�. _. �{� �.,..«, le Km ar Owe=.14 ne Ide CAW sweat, 1 � yar".+•..�, �a��iiq• ._ (Y ® my ° ;.—� _ 4 tr! Curb Types 4 Mti'Y...... -f NMftl se,o T f� p% cos s ow coo�1�iFi�li�•—'��. O �lJI�\ If pYe f-r a-f p.r Own U./ l..r f.l1 a �� + �.rt an u...akiii soi — -r r�./R�^1....,A f�l '. ��� s UT e ROM rm.u[T OS s WWI./.,a ' .1.......115, t (11 , III Add t'a.... • ~n`a _ P 4 SW BONITA 1,3.1.4%113.:.` \`�-4"_ VE/EV!!_P� 4l 5a r a moil ® P:. ...... ■ 4 ;:-i.1__ fli �.a7 i r ., ,% PHAtE I PACA ■ * i. /� D -' Sr PARMI10 Properties,LLC III T:C j/% l /il��. m EXISTING NI 0 •■1//Y.1,1?!".. m ,do� ,irv.u....u■ BIILIX,K' : I e"�jrrr.". .,n.a A m IN i/postw0 c ;,� � w O 5 ° a Paul Schatz • l jj�/ p ai=/i ' I ° Thomasville I. III U. W/ d/�/`///%///• PAUL eCHATZ Mkt_; p .rna,.3�.•~ • ■ r. Q W ya .. -23'48a n VFW:1 /b' ' v) •� ;:fir O Z Site Plan . / Fi�e°rn ° 6 Driveway Plan Vg I _/C .__ r I 18143 B. O !ll��� rea■ mm 4 • 4) °' IO«nritm 'l i'llci ;aft t' 23,E , LM ,•..- a 0 til:.ate!. +' - 4:..:',' �'"•• ��_ `m ' wp o't0''- ice■■�� �' ..I ',o "o" _I m m Dee 03313 LO Ogre Ste Plan NM arrwma Permit Submittal-May 2007 A1.1 9 JOHN •'SHGZ, CONSULTING ZRIbIRIST ISi CGRTIFIti iRI IRIST *W 1177 433 SG 70TH iYGNUG PIRTLiNa, OR •7215 (503) 4S6-1301 G: SiNe)IIST ,WGST.NtT 1t WW.IIl4TR IS.CIII Paul Schatz 6600 SW Bonita Rd. Tigard, OR 97233 December 20th, 2007 Arborist Report: Driveway and miscellaneous improvements ASSIGNMENT This is the last bi-monthly check-up for trees to be preserved on this property. I was being consulted to do construction mitigation for the health of the trees. This report is to inform the concerned parties of their health, after construction. OBSERVATIONS My earlier report inventoried all the trees. Most over 12" DBH were preserved. The neighbor's Douglas-fir is being preserved. Construction affecting the trees is completed. I visited at Don Martin's request on 12/15/07. RECOMMENDATIONS Watering of the trees is finished for the season or until rains end, in June or July. The underground aeration system (by the neighbor's large fir south of the building) is installed and is so are the caps for the standpipes. It will be not necessary to visit again except as a final walk through with the city arborist at his request. The project fences were removed, and I am pleased that all my suggestions were carried out to date. Please contact me with any questions pertaining to this report. IBC -' John O'Shea Consulting Arborist ISA Certified Arborist#WE1877 • JOHN •'SHG .., CONSULTING iR IRIST ISa. CGRTIFlei aRbIgIST *we1177 433 SG 70TH ive rmG rIR,TLiNi. OR •7215 (503) 4S1-•3S1 G: laNJIIST®,WGST.NGT www.I1l4TR 5.0011 Paul Schatz 6600 SW Bonita Rd. Tigard, OR 97233 November 5th, 2007 Arborist Report: Driveway and miscellaneous improvements ASSIGNMENT This is the ninth bi-monthly check-up for trees to be preserved on this property. I am being consulted to do construction mitigation for the health of the trees. This report is to inform the concerned parties of their health. OBSERVATIONS My earlier report inventoried all the trees. Most over 12" DBH were preserved. The neighbor's Douglas-fir is being preserved. Construction affecting the trees is nearly completed and going well. I visited at Don Martin's request on 11/55/07 to advise about working around the small pines. These trees will have very close curbing done. I reiterated my report's demand that I be on site if a root is cut over 1.5" in diameter. I also know that some of the crown will be affected. RECOMMENDATIONS Watering of the pines is recommended until rains supply enough water. This is because with fresh cuts of soil near their bases, they will dry out more quickly. The underground aeration system (by the neighbor's large fir south of the building) is installed and is awaiting caps for the standpipes. It will be necessary to visit again in two weeks. The project fences are properly installed,and I am pleased that all my suggestions were carried out to date. Please contact me with any questions pertaining to this report. C-- (..)//, E tr,2, i Ai 1st Letter Paul Schatz driveway imprc rents, Tigard OR page 2 John O'Shea Consulting Arborist ISA Certified Arborist#WE1877 JOHN •'SHGa... CONSULTING IR$I IST OCT-11-2007 06 :34 AM JOHN O'SHEA 503 408 9308 P. 02 John O'Shea, Consulting Arborist ISA Certified Arborist #WE1877 433 SE 70th Avenue Portland OR 97215 (503) 408.9308 e: banjoist(cgwest.net www.im4trees.com Paul Schatz 6600 SW Bonita Rd. Tigard, OR 97233 October 11th, 2007 Arborist Report: Driveway and miscellaneous improvements ASSIGNMENT This is the seventh bi-monthly check-up for trees to be preserved on this property. I am being consulted to do construction mitigation for the health of the trees. This report is to inform the concerned parties of their health. Q5S.RRVATIONS My earlier report inventoried all the trees. Most over 12" DBH were preserved. The neighbor's Douglas-fir is being preserved. Yesterday I met with the Foreman for the project, Don Martin on site to look at the aeration system he had installed. It is on a permeable cloth layer and is made of several high strength pvc (apparently hard to find and quite expensive). I photographed the aeration system for that tree. It will be covered with gravel, another layer of construction fabric, gravel which can be compacted, and the asphalt mix. RECOMMENDATIONS It will be necessary to visit again in two weeks. The project fences are properly installed, and I am pleased that all my suggestions were carried out to date. Water bags probably will not need to be refilled again, but are to remain on site in case of a dry spell. Please contact me with any questions pertaining to this report. -) 11,2 John O'Shea �/( Consulting Arb ri �- ISA Certified Ar •o ist #WE1877 OCT-11-2007 06 :35 AM JOHN O'SHEA 503 408 9308 P. 03 John O'Shea, Consulting Arborist ISA Certified Arborist #WEI 877 433 SE 70th Avenue Portland OR 97215 (503) 408-9308 e: benjolst @gwest.net www.Im4trees.com Paul Schatz 6600 SW Bonita Rd. Tigard, OR 97233 August 3rd, 2007 Arborist Report: Driveway and miscellaneous improvements ASSIGNMENT This is the fourth bi-monthly check-up for trees to be preserved on this property. I am being consulted to inventory and to give my professional opinion of the health of the trees. This report is to inform the concerned parties of the viability and health of the trees. OBSEI Y ATIONS My earlier report inventoried all the trees. Most over 12" DBH were preserved. The neighbor's Douglas-fir is still being preserved. Last week I met with the Foreman for the project, Don Martin on site and his excavator personnel. We carefully excavated around the driveway on the south of the building and especially by the Douglas-fir of the neighbor. I photographed each step of the way, and am eager to oversee installation of an aeration system for that tree that is being installed in the next several weeks. I will photograph that as well. RECOMMENDATIONS It will be necessary to visit again in two weeks. The project fences are properly installed, and I am pleased that all my suggestions were carried out to date. Water bags will need to be refilled in about five days, in my opinion. My cel number is in the possession of the foreman, Mr. Don Martin, so that if or when roots of preserved trees are encountered, I can be called to inspect, document and or mitigate that condition. This is especially important around the neighbor's Douglas-fir. Please contact me with any questions pertaining to this report. John O'Shea vt occci. Consulting Arb ri ISA Certified Arbo ist #WE1877 i OCT-11-2007 06 :35 AM JOHN O'SHEA 503 408 9308 P. 04 John O'Shea, Consulting Arborist ISA Certified Arborist#WE1877 433 SE 70th Avenue Portland OR 97215 (503) 408.9308 e: banJoist@gwest.net www.1m4trees.com • Paul Schatz 6600 SW Bonita Rd. Tigard, OR 97233 September 14, 2007 Arborist Report' Driveway and miscellaneous improvements ASSIGNMENT This is the sixth bi-monthly check-up for trees to be preserved on this property. I am being consulted to inventory and to give my professional opinion of the omngoing health of the trees. This report is to inform the concerned parties of the viability and health of the trees. Q$S$RYATIONS My earlier report inventoried all the trees. Most over 12" DBH were preserved. The neighbor's Douglas-fir is still being preserved. We are still waiting for installation of an aeration system for that tree;it will installed in the next few weeks. I will photograph that as well. RECOMMENDATIONS It will be necessary to visit again in two weeks. The project fences are properly installed, and I am pleased that all my suggestions were carried out to date. Water bags are being refilled every few days. My cel number is in the possession of the foreman, Mr. Don Martin, so that if or when roots of preserved trees are encountered, I can be called to inspect, document and or mitigate that condition.This is especially important around the neighbor's Douglas-fir. There was recent trenching around the pines in front,and care was taken to keep fill soil away from root systems. Roots cut were outside the fences, and were done leanly. Please contac me i any rti.. 's .4:• 'rig to this report. John O'Shea k Consulting Ar o ' t ISA Certified Arborist #WE1877 JOHN •'SHGa., CINSRLTING ERIEORIST ISa. CGRTIFIN iRJ,IRIST *W 1177 433 SG 70TH iYGNIG FORTUNE OR 17215 (503) 4S1-,3S1 G: lEiNJOI3TAWe3T.NtT WWW.11l4TRGGS.C•11 Paul Schatz 6600 SW Bonita Rd. Tigard, OR 97233 July 21, 2007 Arborist Report: ongoing construction at above address: Driveway and miscellaneous improvements ASSIGNMENT I am being consulted to give my professional opinion of the health of the trees being preserved on the property at the above site. This report is to inform the concerned parties of the viability and health of the trees during construction. This is a report that is ongoing, and will be done every two weeks during construction. Copies go to the foreman, the owner, and the city of TIgardofficials involved in planning and enforcement of the code. / OBSERVATIONS I visited the site on 7/20/07. My earlier report inventoried all the trees. Most over 12" DBH were preserved. During the wet weather we have had, the water bags were not refilled, and they will be refilled on Wednesday the 25th of July,no matter what the weather. All the trees look good, and construction is at a standstill for now. RECOMMENDATIONS It will be necessary to visit again in two weeks. My cel number is in the possession of the foreman, Mr. Don Martin, so that if or when roots of preserved trees are encountered, I can be called to inspect, document and or mitigate that condition. Please contact me with any questions pertainin; to this report. Q4).44. E. a,-, -„ John O'Shea �-- Consulting Arborist j ISA Certified Arbbri t#WE1877 John O'Shea, Consulting Arborist ISA Certified Arborist#WE1877 433 SE 70th Avenue Portland OR 97215 (503) 408-9308 e: banjoist@qwest.net www.im4trees.com Paul Schatz 6600 SW Bonita Rd. Tigard, OR 97233 July 7th,2007 Arborist Report: Driveway and miscellaneous improvements ASSIGNMENT This is the second bi-monthly check-up for trees to be preserved on this property. I am being consulted to inventory and to give my professional opinion of the health of the trees. This report is to inform the concerned parties of the viability and health of the trees. OBSERVATIONS My earlier report inventoried all the trees. Most over 12" DBH were preserved. The neighbor's Douglas-fir is still being preserved. Last week I met with the Foreman for the project, Don Martin, and we discussed tree protection measures. I made it clear that I am responsible for the tree's health during construction. He has purchased and installed water bags to water the trees and to mulched 2-5" deep around all the trees being preserved. The three pines being preserved are a deeper green than I have seen them, suggesting that the deep-root fertilization has already been done. RECOMMENDATIONS It will be necessary to visit again in two weeks. The project fences are properly installed, and I am pleased that all my suggestions were carried out to date. Water bags will need to be refilled in about ten days, in my opinion. My cel number is in the possession of the foreman, Mr. Don Martin, so that if or when roots of preserved trees are encountered, I can be called to inspect, document and or mitigate that condition. This is especially important around the neighbor's Douglas-fir. Please contact me wi any questio• .ert. 'ng to this report.., /,. E. , ipr,c_____, Ly i,.,,orist Letter Paul Schatz driveway improvements, Tigard OR page 2 John O'Shea Consulting Arborist ISA Certified Arborist #WE1877 John O'Shea,Consulting Arborist r . JOHN •'S1-It ... CONSULTING iPI•RIST ISM. CGRTIFIN IR,SOR,IST *W 1177 433 St 70TH iYGNIt FOR,TLZNa. •R, •7215 (503) 4.1-•30i G: S Ne1•IST ,W ST.NGT WWW.I114TRGGS.C•11 Paul Schatz 6600 SW Bonita Rd. Tigard, OR 97233 June 22, 2007 Arborist Report: Driveway and miscellaneous improvements ASSIGNMENT I am being consulted to inventory and to give my professional opinion of the health of the trees being preserved on the property at the above site. This report is to inform the concerned parties of the viability and health of the trees. This is because the driveways and surrounding sidewalks here are under construction. OBSERVATIONS My earlier report inventoried all the trees. Most over 12" DBH were preserved. At this time, another tree is scheduled for removal, the 42" Douglas-fir and a fine has been paid for this. Also, tree number one, the Blue Spruce listed as hazardous, has been removed or fallen. The neighbor's Douglas-fir is still being preserved. I met with the Foreman for the project, Don Martin, and we discussed the tree protection measures being implemented. I made it clear that I am responsible for the tree's health during construction. He was nearly finished fencing trees on site at the time of my visit. He has agreed to purchase water bags to water the trees and to arrange for mulching around the trees to be preserved. He also agreed to deep root feed the pines and fertilize them, as per my suggestion. He is contacting a contractor for this work immediately. RECOMMENDATIONS It will be necessary to visit again in two weeks or sooner to see whether or not these measures have been implemented. My cel number is in the possession of the foreman, Mr. Don Martin, so that if or when roots of preserved trees are encountered,I can be called to inspect, document and or mitigate that condition. Please contact m 1 quens ,;; : to this report. r R' • I 'fist Letter Paul Schatz driveway imp ;ments, Tigard OR page 2 John O'Shea Consulting Arborist ISA Certified Arborist#WE1877 eJIHN •'SHGZ, CONSULTING igloORIST C1�z7soa r ttsrs.°M a �-000169 N DMA Cot.I Ion to aaaamat Cs_ wa1111110110111111111 luutltrsp•Tcr.�et.os (� co 5600 SI7C'3cjidv fe: (� �. 00 O ` CO d,O; 917224 t'maw aiw.••aowaar•sommwta D1i O ':.M1 O felt•!•w1n 'ale•.w.ny etrkwr Nrl•daOm • Cs Cwa�O.e.n Nall(welly M.s.lrwlwY • .'• LS? nlhs:•'Yarwll.o+v.n•r""1:10:10:a!u' 0 CO File li o.:SDR2oo6-)iiK1[s3 er alw a tae<� ' 1 �,�:: CD %Mims Hawaii;011! -0AN Ne°C.'ar"w Q 111•1 rr]Irsl Csu t CM Z 12 TREE RESTRICTIVE COVENANT G �— DEED RESTRICTION cn DecIsmnt is the e-metier of property des:eib�a Ux let 11X,IX'ssbi-tgton Cat sty Tax Map O K Declarant has preserved or retained trees over- and auxins portions of said propery in • acco-dance with the ConL tioos of Approval of the above noted City file.Any su:h pe e_?ved or co retained tree may be removed only if the tree dies or ie Inceardo es arrzmh%to a ceztified ubarist,or °o if a modification tc the above noted conditions of approval ie annoyed by rise ley. This deed c" reetsiction may be newt-mod or will-be considered invalid if a!l trees preserved in accordance with tb_s c-1 section should either die or be removed as hazardous. N TI-1LS AGREEMENT shall be ieetaed a Covenant uniting with toe lane and is bind_-tg icon the owoee.; of property described as tax iot i1)9, Washington County lax Map 251-12AD, - LJ_J Washing'-.m County.Otero, end their Successors and assigns. 1-- IN WITNESS THEREOF, the D'cdatant ass cenuted this agreement on that date and yell . set f,rat-th be'ow. !r is c--'44-1-- • -1-1X-"C>r C 1°I°, - t T 1.o.s f i.r..i- �� j�- 0rei el�4s% • 1'7- 07 ert,.Ll.__ — ' 40-z STATE OF OREGON,COUNTY OF WASHINGTON T� rhs tnstttvneat WRY acknowledged before me by PL ALI i Said ' cc z e1 S cc i l '+ ! f N dOTAJY PUB' —O N DU!:M.)Caaaa t/6aji•Fela-es I— ,i d S U , (O. ,_ SVC J �1�ttit to 1l 'C. ' oo.masetom Paiotem d In oommesom! ARIL lik ZIP O CC . • Received (FRI)JAN 18 2008 11 :02 M due Service Agreement ......s ■md.,rr Paul Seam Furniture JOB tr'10716a STORMWATFR — From: 1215/07 To:1215/08 SOLU11ONS 1Nc. --- -- - _ PACA Properties LLC JPauI Soh= ■ 5034284000 / - awaa.r.1/10,4 6600 SW Bonita Rd,71 OR 97224 6600 SW Bonita Rd,Tillie ,OR 9M4 _ - LProjoet Number _Vault Size #$Typo at Cartrid4PS `Media Type Cost ■■•■■••. 23955.01 MH72 6 SF Pe 1 to S1 500 � '- r• - Visual Ins•t:ctlon 5350 ._. w O G d Mu SDNTE{i(_Sltlnn er-SGW I! 1. CONTCCIS Sformwse.r Sorullons Inc.( WEI:11) .IU perlrm an annual viral'inopvctlon of Me csrtldCuhvnun nyMemle). Rteutet Of tr+rt. vl3WI IropocdOn i i se utilized to eater/nine apprepnatesystent-ey-yrtem rrolna:name needs. Anticipated aye cm-bt.lyarem martUsnance had a=Q Chwn yam. 2. When Ruinuitume Is warranted.CONTECI•I prested&a bumkry ter t?I$includes:swum rernowl of the.ea.mulat.d UGWdo end solids:replacomem of tree atnausled eanriden:disposal of Ore arzvmui od malertal5:and a Cei1 ialo of CO n*wail for fns otonti>rtod maintenance. CONTECM will also crortde n carllfrate for Vow irsrrpel:Ilan whop malnRsunco bi riotvienanlod, 3 Notify et/Weimar•is writlan COnfllrnedon,teat the kraPOCSlon mere►malm.nenefo has town OeffOfmOd. 4_ Any c eclat terms,GAndlllons.swrvlre*(.tr.,)era fofar cr In Addendum A(attaCMd wt en epplierble). Spector Conditions May InClud0. but are not Iketrad m,site specific pricing consioorJUvna:IOC r»rwv(:spacial Ocneavllnp:dlopasal iauws,wtC S. A CaNfiCith of ComoiLanee for ono cep/mime ebual Mars:KmTM et trtoinfeculocer te10 be prgvbesd upon rowlpt of ttaU payment COMMON =eau Visa aryl MasterCard. 6. Contracts nc4 asealiai wink,ea amp at tom sabre miff date may be aia)eette pried Increase. 7. aim=prpvieOd ate=cot m tie CONT'ECH t„educxe listed.bore. Moir ants of crew t arm.rater devices or appunertanca't.t the eta are ua..operalnrnry coma ewtomer(owner). We encourage Iha wear to maintain aI 9rorrnellar Not=MO el the alt. The!avian u be penenned am One!aortal chew ago bates upon the saumQO.n it stumincud access.asesoawda twike ntykkir t.adinp lap to 0 loom N e kWtiw).44 c.adkIraa.een.neleeseuy rrapt•nii and nO Ineepreprirte decnarpe. If Intl condIUeet outcast Me;Mania et I1272410UA efutwrulti than elf-civ wIl to swot, The simmer may be rewubvO to cnarac arlm fete Aura!vuvne)Ore etwml/wd materiels for elepov1 prier ie Inset reeg he.am ware. Wont Malec Rom the prisms of%has s remotes In C$CSat of pentMrW goats■1/be basil as was w+riws. naavl.ud nwn.ls*Mrdvao bon ors%It lannee to pity.Hcablcbel,iegarJOati.deems.00011.:imp eO a et eeaa ,Feet Os ahe ,Chasm,ba toer serve=Po mad ctr.o..ry..rtom ea tune;me e a mewl ameba)*,Iv ii.lemur SeAtambo')• PM.%All nay 7/1a agraemone)s iaa6 r.and inch dai tee afacnod Soavke Amernenr Tames and 1 ,d2t ons. r "XI( s_1 1 I JO3—420—41400 ma.i a IMYH[��LUi cnRec4 CpHT!Gf 319rrrr..ter 301.41•••P.C.I.tic Faslda and r.sK Wiwi la e •wr.Nlw• OwaedRepd.nLUw � r •• ��� • I1/'.... F[reeNr ,. 4 /t''../CP 'af' / et I SC r.— 1.11----- , I,.; ,. ���rr j /6 D g JAN 1 8 2008IT BY: 71 N lawn Dr,Persisted,OR rA.ign,711 0 3.23 www a ter.eOm Z d 91917£005£9 •ON/817: l l 'IS/617: l l 800Z ZZ Ndf(3(11) 38011Nd03 ZIVHOS 1(>dd W0dJ CITY OF TIGARD 1/22/2008 _ ■ 13125 SW Hall Blvd. 1 1:29:41 AM Tigard.OR 97223 503.639.4171 TIGARD Receipt #: 27200800000000000212 Date: 01/22/2008 Line Items: Case No Tran Code Description Revenue Account No Amount Paid SDR2006-00008 [BIKSTP] Bike Striping 200-0000-445004 1,642.50 Line Item Total: $1,642.50 P -'ments: Method Payer User ID Acct./Check No. Approval No. How Received Amount Paid Check PACA PROPERTIES LLC ST 1326 In Person 1,642.50 Payment Total: $1,642.50 ft cReceipt.rpt Page I of I rr, CITY OF TIGARD 1/22/2008 13125 SW Hall Blvd. 11:28:36AM Tigard,OR 97223 503.639.4171 TIGARD Receipt #: 27200800000000000211 Date: 01/22/2008 Line Items: Case No Tran Code Description Revenue Account No Amount Paid SDR2006-00008 [UNGRND] In Lieu Underground 230-0000-445003 14,735.00 Line Item Total: $14,735.00 P-vments: Method Payer User ID Acct./Check No. Approval No. How Received Amount Paid Check PACA PROPERTIES LLC ST 1329 In Person 14,735.00 Payment Total: $14,735.00 f cReceipt.rpt Page 1 of 1 City of Tigard, Oregon • 13125 SW Hall Blvd. • Tigard, ..R 97223 II•. • TIGARD February 22, 2008 Federal Insurance Co. Surety Department 15 Mountain View Rd. Warren,NJ 07059 RE: Paul Schatz (SDR2006-00008)/ Bond Release To Whom It May Concern: This letter serves as written acknowledgement that the City of Tigard has no further interest in the fifty five thousand nine hundred eighty nine dollar ($55,989.00) Bond #8204-13-03 involving R& H Construction, Federal Insurance Company, and the City of Tigard, Oregon regarding landscaping installation. All work under this assurance is satisfactorily complete. If you have questions regarding this matter, please contact me at (503) 718-2437 or cherylc(a tigard-or.gov. Sincerely, Litit.A.? , d. Cc t.-6-1 Cheryl A. Caines Associate Planner c: R& H Construction Co. SDR2006-00008 land use file Lora Garland, Records Phone: 503.639.4171 • Fax: 503.684.7297 • www.tigard-or.gov • TTY Relay: 503.684.2772 City of Tigard 13125 SW Hall Blvd. UI Tigard, OR 97223 (503)639-4171 • FAx TRANSMITTAL T I G A R D Date February 25, 2008 Number of pages including cover 2 sheet To: Jason From: Cheryl Gaines Co: R&H Construction Co: City of Tigard Fax#: 503-224-3638 Fax#: Ph#: (503) 639-4171,Ext. 2437 SUBJECT: Paul Schatz Furniture -Landscape Bond Release Attached is the letter sent to Federal Insurance Co. releasing the bond for Paul Schatz landscaping. Please let me know if you have any questions. TRANSMISSION VERIFICATION REPORT TIME : 02/15/2006 02:19 NAME : FAX . TEL . SER.# : 000G7J417785 DATE,TIME 02/15 02:18 FAX NO. /NAME 95032243638 DURATION 00:00:19 PAGE(S) 02 RESULT OK MODE STANDARD ECM Bond No. 8204-13-03 PUBLIC WORKS CONTRACT BOND-STATE OF OREGON KNOW ALL BY THESE PRESENTS,That we, R & H Construction Co. (hereinafter called the Principal),as Principal,and Federal Insurance Company ,a corporation organized and existing under the laws of the State of Indiana ,and duly authorized to transact a surety business in the State of Oregon(hereinafter called the Surety),are held and firmly bound unto City of Tigard, 13125 SW Hall Blvd. , Tigard, OR 97223 (hereinafter called the Obligee)in the sum of Fifty Five Thousand Nine Hundred Eighty Nine and No/100-- Dollars($ 55,989.00 ) lawful money of the United States of America to be paid to said Obligee, we do bind ourselves, our heirs, executors, administrators, successors,and assigns,jointly and severally,firmly by these presents. THE CONDITION OF THE ABOVE OBLIGATION IS SUCH,That WHEREAS,on tie day of , ,the Principal entere• . contract with the Obligee described as follows: Paul Schaatz Thomasville Furniture, Tigard, OR, Public Landscape Imi,y-• ents, Building Permit#BUP2007-00280 V NOW,THEREFORE, if the Principal herein shall faithfully a observe and comply with the terms of the contract and shall well and truly perform all matters and things undertaken to be perlbrmed under said contract upon the terms proposed therein and shall promptly make payments to all persons supplying labor or material for any prosecution of the work provided for in such contract and shall not permit any lien or claim to be filed or prosecution against the Obligee on account of any labor or material furnished,and shall promptly pay all contributions or amounts due the Industrial Accident Fund and State Unemployment Compensation Fund from the contractor or subcontractors and all sums due the Oregon State Tax Commission for sums of money withheld from the wages of employees of the contractor and his subcontractors pursuant to Section 25 of the personal income tax law of 1969, incurred in the performance of said contract,then this obligation is to be void,otherwise to remain in full force and effect. The total of the Surety's liability under this bond both to the Obligee and to the persons furnishing labor or materials,provisions and goods and to any other person or persons,shall in no event exceed the penalty hereof. Provided,however,that the conditions of this obligation shall not apply to any money loaned or advanced to the Principal or to any subcontractors or other person in the performance of any such work,whether specifically provided for in the contract or not. This bond is executed for the purpose of complying with Chapter 279 of Title 26,Oregon Revised Statutes,the provisions of which are hereby incorporated herein and made a part hereof. IN WITNESS WHEREOF,the above-bounden parties have executed this instrument this 23rd day of January , 2008 • WITNESS: R & H Construction Co. . l Principal By ► Vr. i ederal Insurance, ? -ryii;i/'-4�_,,_ By '• art - Tamara A. RRngelseh " - _ •ttomey-in-Fact S-0544/GE 10/99 '•',i /F. ll: 1 ,`i-.. ri I <.i/i51i ° XDP ET1 Chubb POWER Federal Insurance Company Attn: Surety Department OF Vigilant Insurance Company 15 Mountain View Road Surety ATTC" 'EY Pacific Indemnity Compan Warren, NJ 07059 CI UBB Know All by These Presents, That FEDERAL. INSURANCE COMPANY, an Indiana corporation, VIGILANT INSURANCE COMPANY, a New York corporation, and PACIFIC INDEMNITY COMPANY, a Wisconsin corporation, do each hereby constitute and appoint Gloria Bruning,J. Patrick Dooney, Philip O. Forker,John D.Klump,Vicki Mather, Brent Olson,Ray M. Paiement, Karen A.Pierce and Tamara A. Ringeisen of Portland,Oregon each as their true and lawful Attorney-in-Fact to execute under such designation in their names and to affix their corporate seals to and deliver for and on their behalf as surety thereon or otherwise, bonds and undertakings and other writings obligatory in the nature thereof(other than bail bonds)given or executed in the course of business,and any instruments amending or altering the same,and consents to the modification or alteration of any instrument referred to in said bonds or obligations. In Witness Whereof,said FEDERAL INSURANCE COMPANY,VIGILANT INSURANCE COMPANY,and PACIFIC INDEMNITY COMPANY have each executed and attested these presents and affixed their corporate seals on this 28'". day of February,2005 / 1d eth C.Wendel,Assistant Secretary John Smith,Vice'resident STATE OF NEW JERSEY ss. County of Somerset On this 28w'. day of February,2005 before me,a Notary Public of New Jersey,personally came Kenneth C.Wendel,to me known to be Assistant Secretary of FEDERAL INSURANCE COMPANY, VIGILANT INSURANCE COMPANY, and PACIFIC INDEMNITY COMPANY, the companies which executed the foregoing Power of Attorney, and the said Kenneth C. Wendel, being by me duly sworn, did depose and say that he is Assistant Secretary of FEDERAL INSURANCE COMPANY,VIGILANT INSURANCE COMPANY, and PACIFIC INDEMNITY COMPANY and knows the corporate seals thereof, that the seals affixed to the foregoing Power of Attorney are such corporate seals and were thereto affixed by authority of the By-Laws of said Companies;and that he signed said Power of Attorney as Assistant Secretary of said Companies by like authority;and that he is acquainted with John P. Smith,and knows him to be Vice President of said Companies;and that the signature of John P.Smith,subscribed to said Power of Attorney is in the genuine handwriting of John P.Smith,and was thereto subscribed by authority of said By-Laws and in deponent's presence. Notarial Seal 4NB.Bc tio STEPHEN B BRAT �� ` �`" votary Public,Slag of Now bfsV ,No. 2321097 y��..r �•, Commission Expim pd. 25,2009 Notary Public \f='JEV CERTIFICATION Extract from the By-Laws of FEDERAL INSURANCE COMPANY,VIGILANT INSURANCE COMPANY,and PACIFIC INDEMNITY COMPANY: "All powers of attorney for and on behalf of the Company may and shall be executed in the name and on behalf of the Company,either by the Chairman or the President or a Vice President or an Assistant Vice President.jointly with the Secretary or an Assistant Secretary, under their respective designations. The signature of such officers may be engraved,printed or lithographed.The signature of each of the following officers:Chairman,President,any Vice President,any Assistant Vice President, any Secretary, any Assistant Secretary and the seal of the Company may be affixed by facsimile to any power of attorney or to any certificate relating thereto appointing Assistant Secretaries or Attorneys-in-Fact for purposes only of executing and attesting bonds and undertakings and other writings obligatory in the nature thereof,and any such power of attorney or certificate bearing such facsimile signature or facsimile seal shall be valid and binding upon the Company and any such power so executed and certified by such facsimile signature and facsimile seal shall be valid and binding upon the Company with respect to any bond or undertaking to which it is attached." I,Kenneth C.Wendel,Assistant Secretary of FEDERAL INSURANCE COMPANY,VIGILANT INSURANCE COMPANY,and PACIFIC INDEMNITY COMPANY (the"Companies")do hereby certify that - • (i) the foregoing extract of the By-Laws of the Companies is true and correct, r n• ''r� (ii) the Companies are duly licensed and authorized to transact surety business in all 50 of the United States of America and the Distri ,of Obtygbiaand aa* ,,, authorized by the U.S.Treasury Department;further,Federal and Vigilant are licensed in Puerto Rico and the U.S.Virgin Islands,arkel federal is Iicen4abin American Samoa,Guam,and each of the Provinces of Canada except Prince Edward Island;and r' ' • �t (iii) the foregoing Power of Attorney is true,correct and in full force and effect. ^ —.c: ,4-..:-,..,. 1•,is, ■ - Given under my hand and seals of said Companies at Warren,NJ this 23rd day of January 2008 ? . ...11.. . ,ri • .':.t. a \. .l1tI • seo3RAN� ,ase fir `aSl1Rq/rC�e, i ¢s .,.y'��Ili • ,^'r. gN,erti 0% 1-40,a 44,4N\ dty, ilk--••rk. •�NOIAN�• 'OS .11�v ' ''fw voae f(,G/ ; 61/�6-114, Kenneth C.Wendel,Assistant Secretary IN THE EVENT YOU WISH TO NOTIFY US OF A CLAIM,VERIFY THE AUTHENTICITY OF THIS BOND OR NOTIFY US OF ANY OTHER MATTER, PLEASE CONTACT US AT ADDRESS LISTED ABOVE, OR BY Telephone(908)903-3493 Fax(908)903-3656 e-mail: surety@chubb.com - Form 15-10-0225B-U (Ed. 5-03) CONSENT L Bond No. 8204-13-03 PUBLIC WORKS CONTRACT BOND -STATE OF OREGON KNOW ALL BY THESE PRESENTS,That we, R&H Construction Co. (hereinafter called the Principal),as Principal,and Federal Insurance Company ,a corporation organized and existing under the laws of the State of Indiana ,and duly authorized to transact a surety business in the State of Oregon(hereinafter called the Surety),are held and firmly bound unto City of Tigard, 13125 SW Hall Blvd. , Tigard, OR 97223 (hereinafter called the Obligee)in the sum of Fifty Five Thousand Nine Hundred Eighty Nine and No/100-- Dollars($ 55,989.00 ) lawful money of the United States of America to be paid to said Obligee, we do bind ourselves, our heirs, executors, administrators, successors,and assigns,jointly and severally,firmly by these presents. THE CONDITION OF THE ABOVE OBLIGATION IS SUCH,That W . ; • ,on the 1-�'6K (1Z:6(2-3) day of �� u , 2 at) ,the P ' centered into a contract with the Obligee described as follows: Paul Schaatz Thomasville Furniture, Tigard, OR, Public ist4c Ddpe Improvements, Building Permit#BUP2007-00280 NOW,THEREFORE, if the Principal herein shall faithfully and truly observe and comply with the terms of the contract and shall well and truly perform all matters and things undertaken to be performed under said contract upon the terms proposed therein and shall promptly make payments to all persons supplying labor or material for any prosecution of the work provided for in such contract and shall not permit any lien or claim to be filed or prosecution against the Obligee on account of any labor or material furnished,and shall promptly pay all contributions or amounts due the Industrial Accident Fund and State Unemployment Compensation Fund from the contractor or subcontractors and all sums due the Oregon State Tax Commission for sums of money withheld from the wages of employees of the contractor and his subcontractors pursuant to Section 25 of the personal income tax law of 1969, incurred in the performance of said contract,then this obligation is to be void,otherwise to remain in full force and effect. The total of the Surety's liability under this bond both to the Obligee and to the persons furnishing labor or materials,provisions and goods and to any other person or persons,shall in no event exceed the penalty hereof. Provided,however,that the conditions of this obligation shall not apply to any money loaned or advanced to the Principal or to any subcontractors or other person in the performance of any such work,whether specifically provided for in the contract or not. This bond is executed for the purpose of complying with Chapter 279 of Title 26,Oregon Revised Statutes,the provisions of which are hereby incorporated herein and made a part hereof. IN WITNESS WHEREOF,the above-bounden parties have executed this instrument this 23rd day of January , 2008 R& H Construction Co. WITNESS: Principal By OP ederal Insurance, t?rr0p.YfiAe,/f '',.. e. By r F'.�iL�iri dal 3: A Tamara A. ts= '�L; ;ttomey-in-Fact , S•0544/GE 10/99 M�''4r f F r I t r,r,rNr»,4a Naa� XDP