Loading...
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.
SDR2011-00003
SDR2O11 00003 SCHWINDT MEDICAL/DENTAL OFFICE • NOTICE OF TYPE II DECISION IN • SITE DEVELOPMENT REVIEW (SDR) 2011-00003 SCHWINDT MEDICAL/DENTAL OFFICE T I G A R D 120 DAYS = 06/29/2012 SECTION I. APPLICATION SUMMARY FILE NAME: SCHWINDT MEDICAL/DENTAL OFFICE CASE NO.: Site Development Review(SDR) SDR2011-00003 PROPOSAL: The applicant is requesting Site Development Review approval to demolish an existing 567 square foot vacant building and construct a 3,815 square foot medical/dental office building with associated parking and site improvements on an approximately 15,165 square foot site at SW Summerfield Drive and Durham Road. APPLICANT: KASA Architects, Inc. OWNER: CDBK Properties,LLC Kevin Saxton 11565 SW Durham Rd.,Bldg. F,#10 4110 SE Cesar E. Chavez Blvd. Tigard, OR 97224 Portland,OR 97211 LOCATION: 11445 SW Summerfield Drive; Washington County Tax Map 2S110DC, Tax Lots 00500 and 01300. ZONE: C-G: General Commercial. The C-G zoning district is designed to accommodate a full range of retail,office and civic uses with a City-wide and even regional trade area. APPLICABLE REVIEW Tigard Development Code Chapters 18.360, 18.390, 18.520, 18.705, 18.725, 18.745, CHAPTERS: 18.755, 18.765, 18.780, 18.790, 18.795 and 18.810. SECTION II. DECISION Notice is hereby given that the City of Tigard Community Development Director's designee has APPROVED the above request subject to certain conditions of approval. The findings and conclusions on which the decision is based are noted in Section VI. THIS APPROVAL SHALL BE VALID FOR EIGHTEEN (18) MONTHS FROM THE EFFECTIVE DATE OF THIS DECISION. SDR2011-00003 Schwindt Medical/Dental Office Decision Page 1 of 15 CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL THE FOLLOWING CONDITIONS SHALL BE SATISFIED PRIOR TO THE ISSUANCE OF SITE PERMITS AND BUILDING PERMITS: The applicant shall prepare a cover letter and submit it along with any supporting documents and/or plans that address the following requirements to the CURRENT PLANNING DIVISION,ATTN:ALBERT SHIELDS, 503-718-2426. 1. The applicant shall apply and pay a re-addressing fee prior to issuance of any city permits. 2. Prior to site work the applicant shall pay $6,250 to the Urban Forestry Fund as a fee-in-lieu of planting 50 caliper inches of trees removed. Off-site planting is not an option at this time. 3. Prior to site work, the applicant shall submit a cash assurance (irrevocable letter of credit or cash deposit) of$3,750 for the proposed 30 inches mitigation tree planting.Any trees successfully planted and maintained in accordance with the approved Tree Mitigation Plan and TDC 18.790.060.D, will be credited against the assurance two years after all of the trees are planted. After the trees are planted, the project arborist shall submit a letter to the City Arborist to certify that all of the mitigation trees were properly planted per the approved Tree Mitigation Plan in order to set the starting point of the two year tree establishment period. After the two year establishment period,the applicant shall provide a re-inventory of the mitigation trees conducted by a certified arborist in order to document mitigation tree survival, and compliance with the approved Tree Mitigation Plan. The remaining value of caliper inches not successfully mitigated shall be paid as a fee in-lieu of planting from the original cash assurance. Failure to plant and provide documentation of mitigation tree planting by the project arborist within 6 months of certificate of occupancy issuance shall result in the forfeiture of the cash assurance to the city's Urban Forestry Fund. The applicant shall prepare a cover letter and submit it along with any supporting documents and/or plans that address the following requirements to the ENGINEERING DIVISION, ATTN: MIKE WHITE,503-718-2464. 4. Prior to commencement of any work on the site, the applicant shall obtain a PFI (Public Facility Improvement) permit from the city and a storm water connection permit from CWS for the private water quality facility to be constructed on site, as required by Clean Water Services Design and Construction Standards (Resolution and Order No. 07-20). Both permit applications are to be submitted to the City. The City will review and transmit the storm water connection permit application to CWS for their approval. Final plans and calculations for the water quality facility shall be submitted as part of the PFI application to Development Engineering (Mike White) for review and approval prior to issuance of the PFI.The water quality facility,while private,will be inspected by the City for conformance to water quality requirements. In addition,a proposed maintenance plan for the facility shall be submitted along with the plans and calculations for review and approval. No work shall commence on site until the storm water connection permit is obtained and the PFI permit is subsequently issued. 5. Six (6) sets of detailed plans covering the proposed storm drainage and water quality treatment facility shall be submitted for review to t Development Engineering. NOTE: these plans are in addition to any drawings required by the Building Division and should only include sheets relevant to storm drainage and water quality. PFI permit plans shall conform to City of Tigard Public Improvement Design Standards,which are available at City Hall and the City's web page(www.tigard-or.gov). 6. An erosion control plan shall be provided as part of the PFI permit drawings. The plan shall conform to Clean Water Services Design and Construction Standards (Resolution and Order No. 07-20) Chapter 2. 7. The PFI permit plan submittal shall include the exact legal name, address and telephone number of the individual or corporate entity who will be designated as the"Permittee",and who will provide the financial assurance for the work covered under the permit For example, specify if the entity is a SDR2011-00003 Schwindt Medical/Dental Office Decision Page 2 of 15 corporation, limited partnership, LLC, etc. Also specify the state within which the entity is incorporated and provide the name of the corporate contact person. Failure to provide accurate information to Development Engineering will delay processing of project documents. 8. Prior to issuance of the PFI permit, dedicate 20-foot radius return at SW Durham Road as public right-of-way. 9. Prior to issuance of the PFI permit, provide a public sidewalk easement along Summerfield Drive to cover the existing sidewalk outside the Summerfield ROW. 10. Ensure compliance with Clean Water Services design and construction standards in the design and construction of the water quality treatment facilities on the project 11. The City Engineer may determine the necessity for, and require submittal and approval of, a construction access and parking plan for the onsite construction phase. If the City Engineer deems such a plan necessary,the applicant shall provide the plan prior to issuance of building permits. THE FOLLOWING CONDITIONS SHALL BE SATISFIED PRIOR TO FINAL BUILDING INSPECTION: The applicant shall prepare a cover letter and submit it along with any supporting documents and/or plans that address the following requirements to the CURRENT PLANNING DIVISION,ATTN: HAP WATKINS,503-718-2440. 11. The applicant shall contact the Planning Division for final inspection prior to occupancy. The applicant shall prepare a cover letter and submit it along with any supporting documents and/or plans that address the following requirements to the ENGINEERING DIVISION, ATTN: MIKE WHITE,503-718-2464. 12. The applicant shall connect to public sewer. 13. The applicant shall connect to the existing water system in accordance with approved plans. Coordinate with the City of Tigard Water Division to coordinate this connection. 14. The applicant shall complete the installation of pervious pavers and infiltration planter. 15. The applicant shall complete the installation of all underground service to the development. 16. The applicant shall provide City of Tigard Development Engineering with written confirmation from the professional engineer monitoring the work. The engineer shall certify that the water quality facility has been constructed and completed in conformance with Clean Water Services requirements and the approved plans. 17. The applicant shall enter into an agreement with the city on city-furnished forms for maintenance of the private water quality on-site. That agreement will be recorded and the City will be periodically monitoring the facility in the future for compliance with the terms of the maintenance agreement. 18. The applicant shall provide Development Engineering with one paper copy, and electronic copies in DWG and PDF formats, of the as-built drawings of the water quality treatment facility and any utility connections to the public systems. SECTION III. BACKGROUND INFORMATION Site History: Staff conducted a search of City records for the subject property and found that the small structure was originally the sales office for the Summerfield subdivision and later a satellite bank. The parcels are included in a Planned Development for the Summerfield Commercial Center, a development of office buildings. The property is bounded on two sides by CG zoning and fronts rights-of-way for Summerfield Drive, a neighborhood street,and Durham Road,an arterial. SDR2011-00003 Schwindt Medical/Dental Office Decision Page 3 of 15 Vicinity Information: The subject site is located at 11445 SW Summerfield Drive; WCTM 2S110DC, Tax Lots 00500 and 01300. The property is zoned C-G as are the abutting properties. Site Information and Proposal Description: The applicant is requesting Site Development Review approval to construct a 3,815 square foot medical/dental office with associated parking and site improvements on an approximately 15,165 square foot site. The new building will replace the existing 567 square foot building. Landscaping, street trees, replacement trees and 15 parking spaces are planned. SECTION IV. NEIGHBORHOOD COMMENTS The Tigard Community Development Code requires that property owners within 500 feet of the subject site be notified of the proposal, and be given an opportunity for written comments and/or oral testimony prior to a decision being made. COMMENT: The owner of an adjacent residential property wrote her concerns about this project having enough parking on site and whether the new building would crowd other buildings in the area. RESPONSE: This project has provided the required on-site parking and conforms to the setbacks required for the zone. Substantial tree plantings are shown on the plans. SECTION V. SUMMARY OF APPLICABLE REVIEW CHAPTERS A. Zoning Districts 18.520 Commercial Zoning Districts B. Applicable Development Code Standards 18.705 Access Egress and Circulation 18.725 Environmental Performance Standards 18.745 Landscaping and Screening 18.755 Mixed Solid Waste and Recyclable Storage 18.765 Off-Street parking and loading requirements 18.780 Signs 18.790 Tree Removal 18.795 Visual Clearance C. Street and Utility Improvement Standards 18.810 Street and Utility Improvement Standards D. Impact Study 18.390 Impact Study E. Specific Site Development Review Approval Criteria 18.360 Site Development Review SECTION VI. APPLICABLE REVIEW CHAPTERS A. ZONING DISTRICTS Commercial Zoning District: Section 18.520.020 The site is located in the C-G: General Commercial zoning district. The present use of the site is a 567 square foot vacant building. The proposed use, Medical/Dental Office, is listed in the use classifications under"Medical Office"as a use permitted outright in the zone. Development Standards: Section 18.520.040.B states that development standards in commercial zoning districts are contained in Table 18.520.2: SDR2011-00003 Schwindt Medical/Dental Office Decision Page 4 of 15 TABLE 18.520.2 DEVELOPMENT STANDARDS IN COMMERCIAL ZONES STANDARD C-G Proposed Minimum Lot Size None 15,165 sq ft Minimum Lot Width 50' 110 ft Minimum Setbacks -Front yard 0' 12.5 ft -Side facing street on corner&through lots 0' 5 ft -Side yard 0' 86 ft -Rear yard 0 ft 2.5 ft Maximum Height 45 ft 21 ft Maximum Site Coverage 85% 80% Minimum Landscape Requirement 15% 20% FINDING: As demonstrated in the table above, the proposed development complies with the underlying zone development standards. B. APPLICABLE DEVELOPMENT CODE STANDARDS Access,Egress and Circulation (18.705): Walkways: 18.705.030(F) requires that on-site pedestrian walkways comply with the following standards: Walkways shall extend from the ground floor entrances or from the ground floor landing of stairs, ramps, or elevators of all commercial, institutional, and industrial uses, to the streets which provide the required access and egress. As described in the applicant's plans and narrative, on-site pedestrian walkways consistent with this standard are proposed between the parking area, the building, and the Summerfield Drive right-of-way. This standard is satisfied. Wherever required walkways cross vehicle access driveways or parking lots, such crossings shall be designed and located for pedestrian safety. As described in the applicant's plans and narrative, on-site pedestrian walkways are separated from the parking lot by 6 inch high curbs providing access from the building to the parking area and to the right-of- way consistent with this standard. Required walkways shall be paved with hard surfaced materials such as concrete, asphalt, stone, brick, etc. The plan depicts a new concrete sidewalk from the building to the right-of-way which meets the standard. Access Management: Section 18.705.030.H.1 states that an access report shall be submitted with all new development proposals which verifies design of driveways and streets are safe by meeting adequate stacking needs, sight distance and deceleration standards as set by ODOT, Washington County, the City and AASHTO. Vehicular access is from Summerfield Drive via an existing 25 foot wide reciprocal access easement with the adjacent properties. The easement is on the north side of the property.This standard is satisfied. A preliminary sight distance report was prepared December 12, 2011, by HHPR Engineering, Inc. for the access off Summerfield Drive equal to or greater than that required per AASHTO design standards. This standard is satisfied. Section 18.705.030.H.2 states that driveways shall not be permitted to be placed in the influence area of collector or arterial street intersections. The applicant has shared access rights to the property via an existing easement from the driveway off Summerfield Drive,a private street,thereby meeting this standard. SDR2011-00003 Schwindt Medical/Dental Office Decision Page 5 of 15 Minimum Access Requirements for Commercial and Industrial Use: Section 18.705.030 provides the minimum access requirements for commercial and industrial uses: Table 18.70 3 indicates that the required access width for developments with fewer than 100 parking spaces is one 30-foot access with 24 feet of pavement. The applicant's site plan shows fewer than 100 parking spaces. The shared access meets the 30 foot access width requirement and has 25 feet of paved surface.This standard is satisfied. Environmental performance standards (18.725): Noise: For the purposes of noise regulation, the provisions of Sections 7.41.130 through 7.40.210 of the Tigard Municipal Code shall apply. Visible Emissions: Within the commercial zoning districts and the industrial park (IP) zoning district, there shall be no use, operation or activity which results in a stack or other point- source emission, other than an emission from space heating, or the emission of pure uncombined water (steam)which is visible from a property line. Department of Environmental Quality (DEQ) rules for visible emissions (340-21-015 and 340-28-070) apply. Vibration: No vibration other than that caused by highway vehicles, trains and aircraft is permitted in any given zoning district which is discernible without instruments at the property line of the use concerned. Odors_The emissions of odorous gases or other matter in such quantities as to be readily detectable at any point beyond the property line of the use creating the odors is prohibited. DEQ rules for odors (340-028-090) apply. Glare and heat: No direct or sky reflected glare, whether from floodlights or from high temperature processes such as combustion or welding, which is visible at the lot line shall be permitted, and; 1) there shall be no emission or transmission of heat or heated air which is discernible at the lot line of the source; and 2) these regulations shall not apply to signs or floodlights in parking areas or construction equipment at the time of construction or excavation work otherwise permitted by this title. Insects and rodents: All materials including wastes shall be stored and all grounds shall be maintained in a manner which will not attract or aid the propagation of insects or rodents or create a health hazard. The proposal is a medical/dental office use, which is permitted outright within the C-G zone. The applicant's narrative states that the above standards will be met. Based on the provision of adequate trash and recycling, and the fact that the proposed use is not likely to generate noise, visible emissions, odors, glare and heat, or harbor insects and rodents, this standard is satisfied. Landscaping and Screening(18.745): Street Trees: Section 18.745.040 states that all development projects fronting on a public street or a private drive more than 100 feet in length shall be required to plant street trees in accordance with Section 18.745.040.C. Section 18.745.040.0 requires that street trees be spaced between 20 and 40 feet apart depending on the size classification of the tree at maturity (small,medium or large). The applicant has provided a landscape plan (Sheet L-1.0) that shows acceptable street trees along both Summerfield Drive and Durham Road. Therefore, this standard is satisfied. Buffering and Screening: Section 18.745.050 states that buffering and screening is required to reduce the impacts on adjacent uses which are of a different type. Buffering and/or screening are required for dissimilar uses. The subject site is zoned C-G and is bounded on the north and west by property zoned C-G. Buffering is not required.This standard does not apply. Screening: Special Provisions: Section 18.745.050.E requires the screening of parking and loading areas. Landscaped parking areas shall include special design features which effectively screen the parking lot areas from view. The parking lot is comprised of 15 parking spaces. It is screened from adjacent property and Summerfield Drive by 3 to 4 foot shrubs. Eight street trees and shrub plantings further enhance the screening from the SDR2011-00003 Schwindt Medical/Dental Office Decision Page 6 of 15 right-of-way. Ten other trees are placed for parking lot islands, parking lot canopy and aesthetics. This standard is satisfied. Screening Of Service Facilities. Except for one-family and two-family dwellings, any refuse container or disposal area and service facilities such as gas meters and air conditioners which would otherwise be visible from a public street, customer or resident parking area, any public facility or any residential area shall be screened from view by placement of a solid wood fence or masonry wall between five and eight feet in height. All refuse materials shall be contained within the screened area; Adequate screening of facilities and mechanical equipment is provided by screen walls on the roof as shown on the plans.. Therefore, this standard is satisfied. Screening of Refuse Containers. Except for one- and two-family dwellings, any refuse container or refuse collection area which would be visible from a public street, parking lot, residential or commercial area, or any public facility such as a school or park shall be screened or enclosed from view by placement of a solid wood fence, masonry wall or evergreen hedge. All refuse shall be contained within the screened area. The applicant has been approved by the waste hauler for curb-side pick-up of trash, thereby not requiring a trash/recyclable materials enclosure. Therefore, this standard is satisfied. Mixed Solid Waste and Recyclables Storage (18.755): Chapter 18.755 requires that new construction incorporates functional and adequate space for on-site storage and efficient collection of mixed solid waste and source separated Recyclables prior to pick- up and removal by haulers. The applicant must choose one (1) of the following four (4) methods to demonstrate compliance: Minimum Standard, Waste Assessment, Comprehensive Recycling Plan, or Franchised Hauler Review and Sign-Off. The applicant has submitted a letter (e-mail) from Pride Disposal that states the project has been approved for curb-side pick-up. Therefore,this standard is satisfied. Off-Street Parking and Loading (18.765): Location of vehicle parking: Off-street parking spaces for single-family and duplex dwellings and single-family attached dwellings shall be located on the same lot with the dwellings. Off-street parking lots for uses not listed above shall be located not further than 200 feet from the building or use that they are required to serve, measured in a straight line from the building. The parking lot associated with this project is on the same lot as the proposed building and the spaces are within 10 feet of the entrance. This standard is satisfied. Disabled-Accessible Parking: All parking areas shall be provided with the required number of parking spaces for disabled persons as specified by the State of Oregon Uniform Building Code and federal standards. Such parking spaces shall be sized, signed and marked as required by these regulations. The applicant has indicated that there will be one disabled-accessible parking space provided. According to ORS 447.233, incorporated through reference to the State Building Code, one such space is required. As shown,the site plan is in compliance with State and Federal requirements.This standard is satisfied. Access Drives: With regard to access to public streets from off-street parking, access drives from the street to off- street parking or loading areas shall be designed and constructed to facilitate the flow of traffic and provide maximum safety for pedestrian and vehicular traffic on the site. The proposed access drive and shared access easement shown on the site plan is clearly marked with curbs and landscaped areas. Visual clearance areas are shown on the site plan. No changes are proposed for the shared access off Summerfield Drive. Therefore, this standard is satisfied. SDR2011-00003 Schwindt Medical/Dental Office Decision Page 7 of 15 Parking Lot Striping: Except for single-family and duplex residences, any area intended to be used to meet the off-street parking requirements as contained in this Chapter shall have all parking spaces clearly marked; and all interior drives and access aisles shall be clearly marked and signed to show direction of flow and maintain vehicular and pedestrian safety. The plans submitted show the parking spaces will be clearly marked with striping, consistent with this standard. Wheel Stops: Parking spaces along the boundaries of a parking lot or adjacent to interior landscaped areas or sidewalks shall be provided with a wheel stop at least four inches high located three feet back from the front of the parking stall. The applicant's site plan shows complying wheel stops and protective curbs. The plans reflect that there will be no overhang of vehicles into sidewalks or areas required to maintain the minimum amount of landscaping. Therefore, this standard is met. Space and Aisle Dimensions: Section 18.765.040.N states that: "except as modified for angled parking in Figures 18.765.1 and 18.765.2 the minimum dimensions for parking spaces are: 8.5 feet x 18.5 feet for a standard space and 7.5 feet x 16.5 feet for a compact space"; aisles accommodating two direction traffic, or allowing access from both ends, shall be 24 feet in width. No more than 50% of the required spaces may be compact spaces. The applicant's plans show 8.5 foot width and 18.5 feet depth for 7 standard spaces and 7.5 foot width by 17.5 foot depth for 7 compact spaces. A 24 foot traffic aisle is provided. The plans also show an additional ADA compliant parking space. Therefore, this standard is met. Bicycle Parking Location and Access: Section 18.765.050 states bicycle parking areas shall be provided at locations within 50 feet of primary entrances to structures; bicycle parking areas shall not be located within parking aisles, landscape areas or pedestrian ways; outdoor bicycle parking shall be visible from on-site buildings and/or the street. The applicant's site plan shows three bicycle parking spaces in front of the building that are not in a vehicle parking area,loading area,landscape area,or vehicle circulation aisle.Therefore,this standard is met. Bicycle Parking Design Requirements: Section 18.765.050.C. The racks required for required bicycle parking spaces shall ensure that bicycles may be securely locked to them without undue inconvenience. The applicant has submitted plans showing a three bicycle parking stanchion anchored on a hard surface. The spaces are of adequate size and have sufficient space. Therefore this standard is satisfied. Minimum Bicycle Parking Requirements: The total number of required bicycle parking spaces for each use is specified in Table 18.765.2 in Section 18.765.070.H. In no case shall there be less than two bicycle parking spaces. The bicycle parking requirement for this development is 0.4:1,000 square feet. Three spaces are shown on the plans. This standard is satisfied. Minimum Off-Street Parking: Section 18.765.070.H states the minimum and maximum parking shall be as required in Table 18.765.2. Table 18.765.2 shows the minimum parking for a medical/dental office, is 3.9 spaces per 1,000 gross square feet. For the proposed 3,815 square foot building 14.88 (15) spaces are required. The applicant has proposed 15 spaces, 8 standard and 7 compact. This standard has been met. SDR2011-00003 Schwindt Medical/Dental Office Decision Page 8 of 15 Signs (18.780): Chapter 18.780.130.0 lists the type of allowable signs and sign area permitted in the C-G Zoning District. The applicant's narrative states that no application for a sign permit is included with this submittal. Signage will be reviewed and permitted under a separate application. Therefore this standard does not apply at this time. Tree Removal(18.790): Section 18.790.030 requires that a tree plan for the planting, removal and protection of trees prepared by a certified arborist shall be provided with a site development review application. There are 9 trees on the site, all of which will be removed. There are three healthy trees over 12 inches dbh that must be mitigated for a total of 80 inches. The tree planting plan shows 18 trees to be planted for a total of 58 inches, 30 inches of which will be credited against the 80 inches removed. This will leave 50 inches @125.00 per inch ($6,250) to be paid in lieu of tree planting to the Urban Forestry Fund. This standard can be met as a condition of approval. Visual Clearance Areas (18.795): Chapter 18.795 requires that a clear vision area shall be maintained on the corners of all property adjacent to intersecting right-of-ways or the intersection of a public street and a private driveway. The applicant has indicated the acceptable vision clearance areas at both Summerfield Drive and Durham Road on the site plan.Therefore,this standard is met. FINDINGS: Based on the analysis above, these specific applicable development review standards can be met conditionally. CONDITION: Prior to site work, the applicant shall remit $6,250 to the Urban Forestry Fund in lieu of tree planting. CONCLUSION: Upon completion of the condition mentioned above, the application will be in substantial compliance with Part B, Applicable Development Code Standards of this section. C. STREET AND UTILITY IMPROVEMENTS STANDARDS Street And Utility Improvements Standards (Section 18.810): Chapter 18.810 provides construction standards for the implementation of public and private facilities and utilities such as streets,sewers, and drainage. The applicable standards are addressed below: Improvements: Section 18.810.030.A.1 states that streets within a development and streets adjacent shall be improved in accordance with the TDC standards. Section 18.810.030.A.2 states that any new street or additional street width planned as a portion of an existing street shall be dedicated and improved in accordance with the TDC. Minimum Rights-of-Way and Street Widths: Section 18.810.030.E and Figure 18.810.1 require a S- lane collector to have a right-of-way width varying from 70 to 74 feet. Improvements required include sidewalks, bike lanes, underground utilities, street lighting, storm drainage, planter strips and street trees. The existing ROW on Summerfield is already at a width that meets the development standards. A public sidewalk easement is proposed to cover that portion of the existing sidewalk that hes outside the ROW. Durham Road is at its ultimate ROW for future expansion. A 20 foot ROW radius will be dedicated to the city for the return at Summerfield Drive and Durham Road. Street trees will be provided along both Summerfield Drive and Durham Road. SDR2011-00003 Schwindt Medical/Dental Office Decision Page 9 of 15 Lots - Size and Shape: Section 18.810.060(A) prohibits lot depth from being more than 2.5 times the average lot width, unless the parcel is less than 1.5 times the minimum lot size of the applicable zoning district. There is no minimum lot size in the C-G zoning district.The lot is roughly rectangular in shape approximately 120 feet wide and approximately 135 feet deep. This standard is satisfied. Lot Frontage: Section 18.810.060(B) requires that lots have at least 25 feet of frontage on public or private streets,other than an alley. The subject property has approximately 135 feet of frontage on Summerfield Drive. This standard is satisfied. Sidewalks: Section 18.810.070.A requires that sidewalks be constructed to meet city design standards and be located on both sides of arterial, collector and local residential streets. Private streets and industrial streets shall have sidewalks on at least one side. There is an existing sidewalk along the property frontages on SW Durham Road and SW Summerfield Drive. There is no requirement to construct additional sidewalks on this project.This standard is satisfied. Sanitary Sewers: Sewers Required: Section 18.810.090.A requires that sanitary sewer be installed to serve each new development and to connect developments to existing mains in accordance with the provisions set forth in Design and Construction Standards for Sanitary and Surface Water Management (as adopted by Clean Water Services in 1996 and including any future revisions or amendments) and the adopted policies of the comprehensive plan. Sewer service is required and is available to the site. The existing building is served via a sewer lateral on the north side of the property. The proposed development will connect to this lateral for sewer service. This standard is satisfied. Storm Drainage: General Provisions: Section 18.810.100.A requires developers to make adequate provisions for storm water and flood water runoff. Accommodation of Upstream Drainage: Section 18.810.100.0 states that a culvert or other drainage facility shall be large enough to accommodate potential runoff from its entire upstream drainage area,whether inside or outside the development. The applicant proposes to dispose of storm runoff in the parking lot via pervious pavers. Roof drains will be piped to an infiltration planter for disposal. Therefore,this standard is met. Effect on Downstream Drainage: Section 18.810.100.D states that where it is anticipated by the city Engineer that the additional runoff resulting from the development will overload an existing drainage facility, the Director and Engineer shall withhold approval of the development until provisions have been made for improvement of the potential condition or until provisions have been made for storage of additional runoff caused by the development in accordance with the Design and Construction Standards for Sanitary and Surface Water Management (as adopted by Clean Water Services in 2000 and including any future revisions or amendments). The storm runoff from the project that enters the public system is relatively low and will not overload any downstream drainage facilities. This standard is satisfied. In 1997, Clean Water Services (CWS) completed a basin study of Fanno Creek and adopted the Fanno Creek Watershed Management Plan. Section V of that plan includes a recommendation that local governments institute a stormwater detention/effective impervious area reduction program resulting in no net increase in storm peak flows up to the 25-year event. The City will require that all new developments resulting in an increase of impervious surfaces provide onsite detention facilities. SDR2011-00003 Schwindt Medical/Dental Office Decision Page 10 of 15 Pervious pavers will be used to dispose of storm runoff from the parking lot and an infiltration planter will be constructed to accommodate the roof drains. With this approach, storm water detention is not required. This standard is satisfied. Utilities: Section 18.810.120 states that all utility lines, but not limited to those required for electric, communication, lighting and cable television services and related facilities shall be placed underground, except for surface mounted transformers, surface mounted connection boxes and meter cabinets which may be placed above ground, temporary utility service facilities during construction and high capacity electric lines operating at 50,000 volts or above. There arc no overhead utilities that require undergrounding for this site. Existing utilities are available for service to the site. Underground service to the site is required. The applicant has provided a plan for underground connection to all needed utilities. This standard is satisfied. FINDING: Based on the analysis above,these specific applicable development review criteria have been met. CONCLUSION: The application is in substantial compliance with Part C, Street and Utility Improve- ment Standards, of this section. D. SPECIFIC SITE DEVELOPMENT REVIEW APPROVAL CRITERIA Section 18.360.090(A)(2) through 18.360.090(A)(15) provides additional Site Development Review approval criteria not necessarily covered by the provisions of the previously listed sections. These additional standards are addressed immediately below with the following exceptions: The proposal contains no elements related to the provisions of the following and they are,therefore, found to be not applicable as approval standards: 18.360.090.A.3 (Multi Family Exterior Elevations); 18.360.090.A.5 (Privacy and Noise: Multi-family or Group Living Uses); 18.360.090.A.6 (Private Outdoor Areas: Multi-family Use); 18.360.090.A.7 (Shared Outdoor Recreation Areas: Multi-family Use); 18.360.090.A.8 (100-year floodplain); and 18.360.090.A.9 (Demarcation of Spaces). The following sections were discussed elsewhere in this decision and, therefore, will not be addressed in this section: 18.360.090.A.4 (Buffering, Screening and Compatibility Between Adjoining Uses); 18.360.090.A.12 (Landscaping); 18.360.090.A.13 (Drainage); 18.360.090.A.14 rovision for the Disabled); and 18.360.090.A.15 (Provisions and Regulations of the Underlying Zone). Relationship to the Natural and Physical Environment: Buildings shall be: located to preserve existing trees, topography and natural drainage where possible based upon existing site conditions; located in areas not subject to ground slumping or sliding; located to provide adequate distance between adjoining buildings for adequate light, air circulation, and fire-fighting; and oriented with consideration for sun and wind. Trees shall be preserved to the extent possible. Replacement of trees is subject to the requirements of Chapter 18.790,Tree Removal. The applicant's lan has located the building in a considerate relationship with the natural and physical environment and- as proposed an acceptable tree plan consistent with this standard. 18.360.090.A.10 Crime Prevention and Safety: a. Windows shall be located so that areas vulnerable to crime can be surveyed by the occupants; b. Interior laundry and service areas shall be located in a way that they can be observed by others; c. Mail boxes shall be located in lighted areas having vehicular or pedestrian traffic; SDR2011-00003 Schwindt Medical/Dental Office Decision Page 11 of 15 d. The exterior lighting levels shall be selected and the angles shall be oriented towards areas vulnerable to crime; and e. Light fixtures shall be provided in areas having heavy pedestrian or vehicular traffic and in potentially dangerous areas such as parking lots, stairs, ramps and abrupt grade changes. Fixtures shall be placed at a height so that light patterns overlap at a height of seven feet, which is sufficient to illuminate a person. The areas most vulnerable to crime are well lighted as shown on the plans and there are windows on all four sides of the building.. The City of Tigard Police Department has reviewed and approved the proposal. Therefore this standard is satisfied. Public Transit: Provisions within the plan shall be included for providing for transit if the development proposal is adjacent to an existing or proposed transit route; the requirements for transit facilities shall be based on: the location of other transit facilities in the area; and the size and type of the proposal. The following facilities may be required after City and Tri-Met review: bus stop shelters; turnouts for buses; and connecting paths to the shelters. There is no public transit facility nearby.Therefore, this standard does not apply. FINDING: Based on the analysis above, these specific applicable development review criteria have been met. CONCLUSION: The application is in substantial compliance with Part D, Specific Site Development Review Approval Criteria, of this section. E. ADDITIONAL CITY AND/OR AGENCY CONCERNS WITH STREET AND UTILITY IMPROVEMENT STANDARDS: Storm Water Quality: The City has agreed to enforce Surface Water Management(SWM) regulations established by Clean Water Services (CWS) Design and Construction Standards (adopted by Resolution and Order No. 00-7) which require the construction of on-site water quality facilities. The facilities shall be designed to remove 65 percent of the phosphorus contained in 100 percent of the storm water runoff generated from newly created impervious surfaces. In addition, a maintenance plan shall be submitted indicating the frequency and method to be used in keeping the facility maintained through the year. (For Private Facilities) To ensure compliance with Clean Water Services design and construction standards, the applicant shall employ the design engineer responsible for the design and specifications of the private water quality facility to perform construction and visual observation of the water quality facility for compliance with the design and specifications. These inspections shall be made at significant stages throughout the project and at completion of the construction. Prior to final building inspection, the design engineer shall provide the city Engineer with written confirmation that the water quality facility is in compliance with the design and specifications. (For privately maintained Stormwater Management Units) he proposed unit from Stormwater Management is acceptable, provided the property owner agrees to hire the manufacturer (or approved equal) to provide the required maintenance of the unit. Prior to a final building inspection, the applicant shall demonstrate that they have entered into a maintenance agreement with Stormwater Management, or another company that demonstrates they can meet the maintenance requirements of the manufacturer. With the use of pervious pavers, water quality treatment will not be required for the storm runoff in the parking lot.An infiltration planter will be constructed to accommodate the roof drains. A maintenance agreement between the owner and the city will be required after construction of the infiltration planter to ensure future maintenance. That agreement will be executed using city forms and recorded with Washington County. The city will inspect the facility periodically for compliance with the terms of the agreement.This standard can be met conditionally. SDR2011-00003 Schwindt Medical/Dental Office Decision Page 12 of 15 Grading and Erosion Control: CWS Design and Construction Standards also regulate erosion control to reduce the amount of sediment and other pollutants reaching the public storm and surface water system resulting from development, construction, grading, excavating, clearing, and any other activity which accelerates erosion. Per CWS regulations, the applicant is required to submit an erosion control plan for city review and approval prior to issuance of city permits. An erosion control plan is required as part of the project submittals prior to issuance of any city permits on the project. This includes submittal of an erosion control lan for demolition of the existing building, unless it is incorporated as part of an erosion control plan for the entire project. This standard can be met conditionally. Address Assignments: The existing address, 11445 SW Summerfield Drive,will be retired upon demolition of the existing structure. Upon applicant's application and fee for re-addressing the parcel this standard can be met conditionally. FINDING: A storm water quality maintenance plan and an erosion control plan were not included in the proposal and a new address must be assigned. These requirements can be met conditionally. CONDITIONS: A water quality facility maintenance plan shall be submitted to the city as part the required Public Facility Improvement permit application. An erosion control plan is required as part of the application for a demolition permit for the existing building. This plan shall also reflect erosion control measures for site work and new construction. Applicant shall apply and pay the fee for re-addressing the parcel. CONCLUSION: Upon completion of the conditions mentioned above, the application will be in substantial compliance with Part E,Additional Standards,of this section. F. IMPACT STUDY Section 18.360.090 states, "The Director shall make a finding with respect to each of the following criteria when approving,approving with conditions or denying an application:" Section 18.390.040 states that the applicant shall provide an impact study to quantify the effect of development on public facilities and services. For each public facility system and type of impact, the study shall propose improvements necessary to meet City standard, and to minimize the impact of the development on the public at large, public facilities systems, and affected private property users. In situations where the Community Development Code requires the dedication of real property interests, the applicant shall either specifically concur with a requirement for public right-of-way dedication, or provide evidence that supports that the real property dedication is not roughly proportional to the projected impacts of the development. Section 18.390.040 states that when a condition of approval requires the transfer to the public of an interest in real property, the approval authority shall adopt findings which support the conclusion that the interest in real property to be transferred is roughly proportional to the impact the proposed development will have on the public. A project impact statement was prepared by KASA Architects, Inc. and submitted as part of the proposal narrative stating the following: Impacts to the city's transportation system will be minimal as both Summerfield Drive and Durham Road are full developed. The proposal is projected to create 5 a.m. peak trips, 12 p.m. peak trips and a weekday total of 105 trips. There are no changes proposed to the existing bikeway system. This application has provided updated plans for storm water management. These plans have been submitted to Clean Water Services and the city's development engineer for review and the resulting SDR2011-00003 Schwindt Medical/Dental Office Decision Page 13 of 15 comments are incorporated into the conditions of this decision. Nine full-time employees will be employed within the development. There will be minimal impact on the parks system. SDC charges will apply at building permit issuance. This proposal will utilize an existing water service lateral and new meter. Impact on the water system will be minimal. The site will be connected to an existing 8 inch sanitary sewer service with a 4-inch sewer lateral which will serve the new building. The proposed use will have a minimal impact on the sewer system. The proposal is for a medical/dental office building,with all business related activities occurring within the building. Construction noise will be limited to the City of Tigard guidelines for construction hours. The applicant concurs with and proposes the dedication of property to the right-of-way at the intersection of Summerfield Drive and Durham Road to provide a 20 foot radius turn and grant an easement to the city for that part of the existing sidewalk outside the ROW of Summerfield Drive. FINDING: The project proposal adequately addresses the impact study standards. CONCLUSION: The application is in compliance with Part F, Impact Study,of this section. SECTION VII. OTHER STAFF COMMENTS City of Tigard Arborist: The city Arborist has reviewed the proposal and his comments and conditions are incorporated into this decision in SECTION II. City of Tigard Building Division, Police Department, and Public Works: These city offices have reviewed the proposal documents and have no comments or conditions regarding this land use decision. City of Tigard Development Engineer: The Development Engineer reviewed the proposal and his comments and conditions are incorporated into this decision in SECTION II and SECTION VI. SECTION VIII. AGENCY COMMENTS Clean Water Services: Clean Water Services was provided a copy of the application documents and plans and their office provided standard comments. Applicable issues have been reviewed by the city Development Engineer and conditions will be listed in SECTION II of this decision. Tualatin Valley Fire and Rescue: TVF&R has reviewed and endorsed the proposal in a letter dated March 12, 2012. Oregon Department of Transportation: ODOT was sent a copy of the plans and narrative and did not comment. Tri-Met:Tri-Met was sent a copy of the plans and narrative and did not comment. SECTION IX. PROCEDURE AND APPEAL INFORMATION Notice: Notice was posted at City Hall and mailed to: X The applicant and owners X Owner of record within the required distance X Affected government agencies SDR2011-00003 Schwindt Medical/Dental Office Decision Page 14 of 15 Final Decision: THIS DECISION IS FINAL ON APRIL 18,2012 AND BECOMES EFFECTIVE ON MAY 2, 2012 UNLESS AN APPEAL IS FILED. Aral: The decision of the Director (Type II Procedure) or Review Authority (Tyyppee II Administrative Appeal or Type III Procedure) is final for purposes of appeal on the date that it is mailed. Any party with standing as provided in Section 18.390.040.G.1. may appeal this decision in accordance with Section 18.390.040.G.2. of the Tigard Community Development Code which provides that a written appeal together with the required fee shall be filed with the Director within ten (10)business days of the date the notice of the decision was mailed. The appeal fee schedule and forms are available from the Planning Division of Tigard City Hall, 13125 SW Hall Boulevard,Tigard,Oregon 97223. Unless the applicant is the appellant, the hearing on an appeal from the Director's Decision shall be confined to the spe ' c issues identified in the written comments submitted by the parties during the comment period. Additional evidence concerning issues properly raised in the Notice of Appeal may be submitted by any party during the appeal hearing,subject to any additional rules of procedure that may be adopted from time to time by the appellate body. THE DEADLINE FOR FILING AN APPEAL IS 5:00 PM ON MAY 1, 2012. uestions: I you have any questions, please call the City of Tigard Planning Division, Tigard City Hall, 13125 SW Hall Boulevard,Tigard,Oregon at(503) 6394171. April 18.2012 PREPARED BY: Darre ap"Watkins DATE Livab 'ty Compliance Specialist April 18,2012 APPROVED : : Tom McGuire DATE Principal Planner SDR2011-00003 Schwindt Medical/Dental Office Decision Page 15 of 15 1,1 City of Tigard TIGARD Memorandum To: Hap Watkins From: Todd Prager Re: Schwindt Dental Office Date: March 5, 2012 As you requested I have provided comments on the "Schwindt Dental Office" project. If you have any questions or concerns regarding my comments please contact me anytime. 18.745.040, Street Trees The proposed street trees along Durham Road and Summerfield Drive on sheet L1.0 meet the species and spacing requirements. 18.745.050, Buffering and Screening B. Buffering and screening requirements. Not applicable. E. Screening:special provisions. 1. Screening and landscaping ofparking and loading areas: a. Screening ofparking and loading areas is required. The specifications for this screening are as follows: (1) Landscaped parking areas shall include special design features which effectively screen the parting lot areas from view. These design features may include the use of landscaped berms, decorative walls and raised planters; (2) Landscape planters may be used to define or screen the appearance of off- street parking areas from the public right-of-way; (3) Materials to be installed should achieve a balance between low lying and vertical shrubbery and trees; r. (4) Trees shall be planted in landscaped islands in all parking areas, and shall be equally distributed and on the basis of one tree for each seven parking spaces in order to provide a canopy effect;and (5) The minimum dimension of the landscape islands shall be three feet and the landscaping shall be protected from vehicular damage by some form of wheel guard or curb. The proposed parking lot trees on sheet L1.0 meet the requirements of this section. 18.790.030, Tree Plan Requirement A. Tree plan required. A tree plan for the planting, removal and protection of trees prepared by a certified arborist shall be provided for any lot,parcel or combination of lots or parcels for which a development application for a subdivision, partition, site development review,planned development or conditional use is filed. Protection is preferred over removal wherever possible. A tree plan is provided on sheet T1.0. B. Plan requirements. The tree plan shall include the following: 1. Identification of the location, size and species of all existing trees including trees designated as significant by the city; The location, size, and species of all existing trees are shown on sheet T1.0. 2 Identification of a program to save existing trees or mitigate tree removal over V inches in caliper. Mitigation must follow the replacement guidelines of Section 18.790.060D, in accordance with the following standards and shall be exclusive of trees required by other development code provisions for landscaping, streets and parking lots: a. Retention of less than 25% of existing trees over V inches in caliper requires a mitigation program in accordance with Section 18.790.060D of no net loss of trees; b. Retention of from 25% to 50% of existing trees over 12 inches in caliper requires that two-thirds of the trees to be removed be mitigated in accordance with Section 18.790.060D; c. Retention of from 50% to 75% of existing trees over 12 inches in caliper requires that 50 percent of the trees to be removed be mitigated in accordance with Section 18.790.060D; d. Retention of 75% or greater of existing trees over 12 inches in caliper requires no mitigation. 100% of the trees over 12" diameter will be removed. 80" of mitigation is required. The mitigation proposal on sheet L1.0 includes upsizing required street and parking lot trees, and planting additional trees. The total amount of proposed mitigation is 43". Therefore, a fee in lieu of$4,625 (37" x $125/inch fee in lieu) for the remaining inches not mitigated is required. 3. Identification of all trees which are proposed to be removed; As stated above, all trees are proposed to be removed. 4. A protection program defining standards and methods that will be used by the applicant to protect trees during and after construction. This requirement is not applicable because all trees are proposed for removal. B. Subsequent removal of a tree. Any tree preserved or retained in accordance with this section may thereafter be removed only for the reasons set out in a tree plan, in accordance with Section 18.790.030, or as a condition of approval for a conditional use, and shall not be subject to removal under any other section of this chapter. The property owner shall record a deed restriction as a condition of approval of any development permit affected by this section to the effect that such tree may be removed only if the tree dies or is hazardous according to a certified arborist. The deed restriction may be removed or will be considered invalid if a tree preserved in accordance with this section should either die or be removed as a hazardous tree. The form of this deed restriction shall be subject to approval by the Director. This requirement is not applicable. RECOMMENDED CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL Mitigation Prior to site work, the applicant shall remit payment of$4,625 into the Urban Forestry Fund as a fee in lieu of tree planting. Prior to site work, the applicant shall submit a cash assurance (irrevocable letter of credit or cash deposit) of$5,375 for the proposed mitigation tree planting. Any trees successfully planted and maintained in accordance with the approved Tree Mitigation Plan and TDC 18.790.060.D, will be credited against the assurance two years after all of the trees are planted. After the trees are planted, the project arborist shall submit a letter to the City Arborist to certify that all of the mitigation trees were properly planted per the approved Tree Mitigation Plan in order to set the starting point of the two year tree establishment period. After the two year establishment period, the applicant shall provide a re-inventory of the mitigation trees conducted by a certified arborist in order to document mitigation tree survival, and compliance with the approved Tree Mitigation Plan. The remaining value of caliper inches not successfully mitigated shall be paid as a fee in-lieu of planting from the original cash assurance. Failure to plant and provide documentation of mitigation tree planting by the project arborist within 6 months of certificate of occupancy issuance shall result in the forfeiture of the cash assurance to the city's Urban Forestry Fund. • MEMORANDUM CITY OF TIGARD, OREGON DATE: March 7, 2012 TO: Hap Watkins, Assistant Planner •�'� FROM: Gus Duenas, Development Engineer RE: SDR2011-00003 Schwindt Dental Office Access Management (Section 18.705.030.H) Section 18.705.030.H.1 states that an access report shall be submitted with all new development proposals which verifies design of driveways and streets are safe by meeting adequate stacking needs, sight distance and deceleration standards as set by ODOT, Washington County, the City and AASHTO. Vehicular access is from Summerfield Drive via an existing 25-foot wide reciprocal access casement with the adjacent properties. The easement is on the north side of the property. Section 18.705.030.H.2 states that driveways shall not be permitted to be placed in the influence area of collector or arterial street intersections. Influence area of intersections is that area where queues of traffic commonly form on approach to an intersection. The minimum driveway setback from a collector or arterial street intersection shall be150 feet, measured from the right-of-way line of the intersecting street to the throat of the proposed driveway. The setback may be greater depending upon the influence area, as determined from City Engineer review of a traffic impact report submitted by the applicant's traffic engineer. In a case where a project has less than 150 feet of street frontage, the applicant must explore any option for shared access with the adjacent parcel. If shared access is not possible or practical, the driveway shall be placed as far from the intersection as possible. Section 18.705.030.H.3 and 4 states that the minimum spacing of driveways and streets along a collector shall be 200 feet. The minimum spacing of driveways and streets along an arterial shall be 600 feet. The minimum spacing of local streets along a local street shall be 125 feet. Durham Road is a city arterial street. Summerfield Drive is a neighborhood route. There is no direct access to the site from Durham Road. This requirement is not applicable. Street And Utility Improvements Standards (Section 18.810): Chapter 18.810 provides construction standards for the implementation of public and private facilities and utilities such as streets, sewers, and drainage. The applicable standards are addressed below: ENGINEERING COMMENTS SDR2011-00003 Schwindt Dental Office PAGE 1 Streets: Improvements: Section 18.810.030.A.1 states that streets within a development and streets adjacent shall be improved in accordance with the TDC standards. Section 18.810.030.A.2 states that any new street or additional street width planned as a portion of an existing street shall be dedicated and improved in accordance with the TDC. Minimum Rights-of-Way and Street Widths: Section 18.810.030E and Figure 18.810.1 require a three-lane collector to have right-of-way varying from 70 feet to 74 feet. Improvements required include sidewalks, bike lanes, underground utilities, street lighting, storm drainage, planter strips and street trees. • A 20-foot ROW radius for the return at SW Durham Road and Summerfield Drive is required. • The existing sidewalk is partially outside the existing right-of-way on Summerfield Drive. However, the existing ROW on Summerfield is already at a width that meets the development standards.A public sidewalk easement is required to cover that portion of the existing sidewalk that lies outside the ROW. • No street improvements are required as Summerfield Drive is already fully widened along the property frontage and Durham Road is already at its ultimate ROW for future expansion. However,street trees are required along the Durham Road and Summerfield Drive frontages. The applicant proposes to plant street trees along the frontages of both streets and along the access easement on the north side of the property. Future Street Plan and Extension of Streets: Section 18.810.030.F states that a future street plan shall be filed which shows the pattern of existing and proposed future streets from the boundaries of the proposed land division. This section also states that where it is necessary to give access or permit a satisfactory future division of adjoining land, streets shall be extended to the boundary lines of the tract to be developed and a barricade shall be constructed at the end of the street. These street stubs to adjoining properties are not considered to be cul-de-sacs since they are intended to continue as through streets at such time as the adjoining property is developed. A barricade shall be constructed at the end of the street by the property owners which shall not be removed until authorized by the City Engineer, the cost of which shall be included in the street construction cost. Temporary hammerhead turnouts or temporary cul-de-sac bulbs shall be constructed for stub streets in excess of 150 feet in length. There are no future streets proposed through this development. ENGINEERING COMMENTS SDR2011-00003 Schwindt Dental Office PAGE 2 Street Alignment and Connections: Section 18.810.030.H.1 states that full street connections with spacing of no more than 530 feet between connections is required except where prevented by barriers such as topography, railroads, freeways, pre-existing developments, lease provisions, easements, covenants or other restrictions existing prior to May 1, 1995 which preclude street connections. A full street connection may also be exempted due to a regulated water feature if regulations would not permit construction. Section 18.810.030.H.2 states that all local, neighborhood routes and collector streets which abut a development site shall be extended within the site to provide through circulation when not precluded by environmental or topographical constraints, existing development patterns or strict adherence to other standards in this code. A street connection or extension is precluded when it is not possible to redesign, or reconfigure the street pattern to provide required extensions. Land is considered topographically constrained if the slope is greater than 15% for a distance of 250 feet or more. In the case of environmental or topographical constraints, the mere presence of a constraint is not sufficient to show that a street connection is not possible. The applicant must show why the constraint precludes some reasonable street connection. Cul-de-sacs: 18.810.030.L states that a cul-de-sac shall be no more than 200 feet long, shall not provide access to greater than 20 dwelling units, and shall only be used when environmental or topographical constraints, existing development pattern, or strict adherence to other standards in this code preclude street extension and through circulation: • All cul-de-sacs shall terminate with a turnaround. Use of turnaround configurations other than circular, shall be approved by the City Engineer; and • The length of the cul-de-sac shall be measured from the centerline intersection point of the two streets to the radius point of the bulb, and • If a cul-de-sac is more than 300 feet long, a lighted direct pathway to an adjacent street may be required to be provided and dedicated to the City. N/A Grades and Curves: Section 18.810.030.N states that grades shall not exceed ten percent on arterials, 12% on collector streets, or 12% on any other street (except that local or residential access streets may have segments with grades up to 15% for distances of no greater than 250 feet). Centerline radii of curves shall be as determined by the City Engineer. ENGINEERING COMMENTS SDR2011-00003 Schwindt Dental Office PAGE 3 N/A Access to Arterials and Major Collectors: Section 18.810.030.Q states that where a development abuts or is traversed by an existing or proposed arterial or major collector street, the development design shall provide adequate protection for residential properties and shall separate residential access and through traffic, or if separation is not feasible, the design shall minimize the traffic conflicts. The design shall include any of the following: • A parallel access street along the arterial or major collector; • Lots of suitable depth abutting the arterial or major collector to provide adequate buffering with frontage along another street; • Screen planting at the rear or side property line to be contained in a non-access reservation along the arterial or major collector; or • Other treatment suitable to meet the objectives of this subsection; • If a lot has access to two streets with different classifications, primary access should be from the lower classification street. There are no residential properties adjacent to this site. These requirements are not applicable. Private Streets: Section 18.810.030.T states that design standards for private streets shall be established by the City Engineer. The City shall require legal assurances for the continued maintenance of private streets, such as a recorded maintenance agreement. Private streets serving more than six dwelling units are permitted only within planned developments, mobile home parks, and multi-family residential developments. N/A Block Designs - Section 18.810.040.A states that the length, width and shape of blocks shall be designed with due regard to providing adequate building sites for the use contemplated, consideration of needs for convenient access, circulation, control and safety of street traffic and recognition of limitations and opportunities of topography. Block Sizes: Section 18.810.040.B.1 states that the perimeter of blocks formed by streets shall not exceed 1,800 feet measured along the right-of- way line except: • Where street location is precluded by natural topography, wetlands or other bodies of water or, pre-existing development or; • For blocks adjacent to arterial streets, limited access highways, major collectors or railroads. ENGINEERING COMMENTS SDR2011-00003 Schwindt Dental Office PAGE 4 • For non-residential blocks in which internal public circulation provides equivalent access. Section 18.810.040.B.2 also states that bicycle and pedestrian connections on public easements or right-of-ways shall be provided when full street connection is not possible. Spacing between connections shall be no more than 330 feet, except where precluded by environmental or topographical constraints, existing development patterns, or strict adherence to other standards in the code. There are no requirements for bicycle and pedestrian connections through the proposed development. Section 18.810.050 Easements A public sidewalk easement is required to cover the portion of the existing sidewalk that lies outside of the ROW of Summerfield Drive. Lots - Size and Shape: Section 18.810.060(A) prohibits lot depth from being more than 2.5 times the average lot width, unless the parcel is less than 1.5 times the minimum lot size of the applicable zoning district. N/A Lot Frontage: Section 18.810.060(B) requires that lots have at least 25 feet of frontage on public or private streets, other than an alley. In the case of a land partition, 18.420.050.A.4.c applies, which requires a parcel to either have a minimum 15-foot frontage or a minimum 15-foot wide recorded access easement. In cases where the lot is for an attached single-family dwelling unit, the frontage shall be at least 15 feet. N/A. No new lots are being created.This is a pre-existing lot. Sidewalks: Section 18.810.070.A requires that sidewalks be constructed to meet City design standards and be located on both sides of arterial, collector and local residential streets. If there is an existing sidewalk on the same side of the street of the development and within 300 feet of the development site in either direction, the sidewalk shall be extended from the site to meet the existing sidewalk, subject to rough proportionality. Private streets and industrial streets shall have sidewalks on at least one side. 'here is existing sidewalk along the property frontages on SW Durham Road and SW Summerfield Drive. There is no requirement to construct additional sidewalk on this project. ENGINEERING COMMENTS SDR2011-00003 Schwindt Dental Office PAGE 5 Sanitary Sewers: Sewers Required: Section 18.810.090.A requires that sanitary sewer be installed to serve each new development and to connect developments to existing mains in accordance with the provisions set forth in Design and Construction Standards for Sanitary and Surface Water Management (as adopted by Clean Water Services in 1996 and including any future revisions or amendments) and the adopted policies of the comprehensive plan. Sewer service is required and is available to the site. The existing building is served via a sewer lateral on the north side of the property. The proposed development will connect to this lateral for sewer service. This requirement is met. Over-sizing: Section 18.810.090.0 states that proposed sewer systems shall include consideration of additional development within the area as projected by the Comprehensive Plan. This requirement is not applicable. Storm Drainage: General Provisions: Section 18.810.100.A requires developers to make adequate provisions for storm water and flood water runoff. Accommodation of Upstream Drainage: Section 18.810.100.0 states that a culvert or other drainage facility shall be large enough to accommodate potential runoff from its entire upstream drainage area, whether inside or outside the development. The City Engineer shall approve the necessary size of the facility, based on the provisions of Design and Construction Standards for Sanitary and Surface Water Management (as adopted by Clean Water Services in 2000 and including any future revisions or amendments). The applicant proposes to dispose of storm runoff in the parking lot via pervious pavers. Roof drains will be piped to an infiltration planter for disposal.This requirement is met. Effect on Downstream Drainage: Section 18.810.100.D states that where it is anticipated by the City Engineer that the additional runoff resulting from the development will overload an existing drainage facility, the Director and Engineer shall withhold approval of the development until provisions have been made for improvement of the potential condition or until provisions have been made for storage of additional runoff caused by the development in accordance with the Design and Construction Standards ENGINEERING COMMENTS SDR2011-00003 Schwindt Dental Office PAGE 6 for Sanitary and Surface Water Management (as adopted by Clean Water Services in 2000 and including any future revisions or amendments). The storm runoff from the project that enters the public system is relatively low and will not overload any downstream drainage facilities. In 1997, Clean Water Services (CWS) completed a basin study of Fanno Creek and adopted the Fanno Creek Watershed Management Plan. Section V of that plan includes a recommendation that local governments institute a stormwater detention/effective impervious area reduction program resulting in no net increase in storm peak flows up to the 25-year event. The City will require that all new developments resulting in an increase of impervious surfaces provide onsite detention facilities, unless the development is located adjacent to Fanno Creek. For those developments adjacent to Fanno Creek, the storm water runoff will be permitted to discharge without detention. Pervious pavers will be used to dispose of storm runoff from the parking lot and an infiltration planter will be constructed to accommodate the roof drains. With this approach, storm water detention is not required. This requirement is met. Bikeways and Pedestrian Pathways: Bikeway Extension: Section 18.810.110.A states that developments adjoining proposed bikeways identified on the City's adopted pedestrian/bikeway plan shall include provisions for the future extension of such bikeways through the dedication of easements or right-of-way. There are no proposed bikeways or pedestrian walkways on the property. This requirement is not applicable. Utilities: Section 18.810.120 states that all utility lines, but not limited to those required for electric, communication, lighting and cable television services and related facilities shall be placed underground, except for surface mounted transformers, surface mounted connection boxes and meter cabinets which may be placed above ground, temporary utility service facilities during construction, high capacity electric lines operating at 50,000 volts or above, and: • The developer shall make all necessary arrangements with the serving utility to provide the underground services; • The City reserves the right to approve location of all surface mounted facilities; ENGINEERING COMMENTS SDR2011-00003 Schwindt Dental Office PAGE 7 • All underground utilities, including sanitary sewers and storm drains installed in streets by the developer, shall be constructed prior to the surfacing of the streets; and • Stubs for service connections shall be long enough to avoid disturbing the street improvements when service connections are made. Exception to Under-Grounding Requirement: Section 18.810.120.0 states that a developer shall pay a fee in-lieu of under-grounding costs when the development is proposed to take place on a street where existing utilities which are not underground will serve the development and the approval authority determines that the cost and technical difficulty of under- grounding the utilities outweighs the benefit of under-grounding in conjunction with the development. The determination shall be on a case- by-case basis. The most common, but not the only, such situation is a short frontage development for which under-grounding would result in the placement of additional poles, rather than the removal of above-ground utilities facilities. An applicant for a development which is served by utilities which are not underground and which are located across a public right-of-way from the applicant's property shall pay a fee in-lieu of under- grounding. l'here are no overhead utilities that require undergrounding for this site. Existing utilities are available for service to the site. Underground service to the site is required. The applicant has provided a plan for underground connection to all needed utilities.This requirement is met. ADDITIONAL CITY AND/OR AGENCY CONCERNS WITH STREET AND UTILITY IMPROVEMENT STANDARDS: Fire and Life Safety: Tualatin Valley Fire and Rescue (TVF&R) is the service provider for fire and emergency services.The District should be contacted for information regarding the adequacy of circulation systems,the need for fire hydrants,or other questions related to fire protection. The applicant has noted that two fire hydrants are located in the vicinity and are available to service the site.Water pressure in the area is adequate. Public Water System: Water service is available to the site. The City of Tigard is the water service provider in this area. The proposed development will extend a new water line to connect to an existing meter along the south property line adjacent to Durham Road.This requirement is met. Storm Water Quality: ENGINEERING COMMENTS SDR2011-00003 Schwindt Dental Office PAGE 8 The City has agreed to enforce Surface Water Management (SWM) regulations established by Clean Water Services (CWS) Design and Construction Standards (adopted by Resolution and Order No. 00-7) which require the construction of on-site water quality facilities. The facilities shall be designed to remove 65 percent of the phosphorus contained in 100 percent of the storm water runoff generated from newly created impervious surfaces. In addition, a maintenance plan shall be submitted indicating the frequency and method to be used in keeping the facility maintained through the year. (For Private Facilities) To ensure compliance with Clean Water Services design and construction standards, the applicant shall employ the design engineer responsible for the design and specifications of the private water quality facility to perform construction and visual observation of the water quality facility for compliance with the design and specifications. These inspections shall be made at significant stages throughout the project and at completion of the construction. Prior to final building inspection, the design engineer shall provide the City of Tigard (Inspection Supervisor) with written confirmation that the water quality facility is in compliance with the design and specifications. (For privately maintained Stormwater Management Units) The proposed unit from Stormwater Management is acceptable, provided the property owner agrees to hire the manufacturer (or approved equal) to provide the required maintenance of the unit. Prior to a final building inspection, the applicant shall demonstrate that they have entered into a maintenance agreement with Stormwater Management, or another company that demonstrates they can meet the maintenance requirements of the manufacturer. With the use of pervious pavers,water quality treatment will not be required for the storm runoff in the parking lot. An infiltration planter will be constructed to accommodate the roof drains. This requirement is met. A maintenance agreement between the owner and the city will be required after construction of the infiltration planter to ensure future maintenance.That agreement will be executed using city forms and recorded with Washington County.The city will inspect the facility periodically for compliance with the terms of the agreement. Grading and Erosion Control: CWS Design and Construction Standards also regulate erosion control to reduce the amount of sediment and other pollutants reaching the public storm and surface water system resulting from development, construction, grading, excavating, clearing, and any other activity which accelerates erosion. Per CWS regulations, the applicant is required to submit an ENGINEERING COMMENTS SDR2011-00003 Schwindt Dental Office PAGE 9 erosion control plan for City review and approval prior to issuance of City permits. The Federal Clean Water Act requires that a National Pollutant Discharge Elimination System (NPDES) erosion control permit be issued for any development that will disturb one or more acre of land. An erosion control plan is required with the onsite plans for the project. An erosion control permit is required before any work begins on the site. Site Permit Required: A site permit from the Building Division is required before any work begins on the site. An erosion control plan will be submitted as part of the application for the site permit. Address Assignments: The City of Tigard is responsible for assigning addresses for parcels within the City of Tigard. An addressing fee in the amount of $50.00 per address shall be assessed. This fee shall be paid to the City prior to site permit. For multi-tenant buildings, one address number is assigned to the building and then all tenant spaces are given suite numbers. The City is responsible for assigning the main address and suite numbers. This information is needed so that building permits for tenant improvements can be adequately tracked in the City's permit tracking system. .1 new address will be issued for the proposed new building. The current address will be retired with the demolition permit to remove the existing building. The address fee shall be paid before the new address is issued. Recommendations: THE FOLLOWING CONDITIONS SHALL BE SATISFIED PRIOR TO COMMENCEMENT OF ANY WORK ON SITE: • Prior to commencement of any work on the site, the applicant shall obtain a PFI (Public Facility Improvement) permit from the city and a storm water connection permit from CWS for the private water quality facility to be constructed on site, as required by Clean Water Services Design and Construction Standards (Resolution and Order No. 07-20). Both permit applications are to be submitted to the City. The City will review and transmit the storm water connection permit application to CWS for their approval. Final plans and calculations for the water quality facility shall be submitted as part of the PFI application to the Development Engineer (Gus Duenas) for review and approval prior to issuance of the PFI. The water quality facility, while private,will be inspected by the City for conformance to water quality requirements. In addition,a proposed maintenance plan for the facility shall be submitted along with the ENGINEERING COMMENTS SDR2011-00003 Schwindt Dental Office PAGE 10 plans and calculations for review and approval. No work shall commence on site until the storm water connection permit is obtained and the PFI permit is subsequently issued. • Six (6) sets of detailed plans covering the proposed storm drainage and water quality treatment facility shall be submitted for review to the Development Engineer. NOTE: these plans are in addition to any drawings required by the Building Division and should only include sheets relevant to storm drainage and water quality. PFI permit plans shall conform to City of Tigard Public Improvement Design Standards,which are available at City Hall and the City's web page (www.tigard-or.gov). • An erosion control plan shall be provided as part of the PFI permit drawings. The plan shall conform to Clean Water Services Design and Construction Standards (Resolution and Order No.07-20) Chapter 2. • The PFI permit plan submittal shall include the exact legal name,address and telephone number of the individual or corporate entity who will be designated as the"Permittee", and who will provide the financial assurance for the work covered under the permit. For example, specify if the entity is a corporation, limited partnership, LLC, etc. Also specify the state within which the entity is incorporated and provide the name of the corporate contact person. Failure to provide accurate information to the Development Engineer will delay processing of project documents. • Prior to issuance of the PFI permit,dedicate 20-foot radius return at SW Durham Road as public right-of-way • Prior to issuance of the PFI permit, provide a public sidewalk easement along Summerfield Drive to cover the existing sidewalk outside the Summerfield ROW. • Ensure compliance with Clean Water Services design and construction standards in the design and construction of the water quality treatment facilities on the project • Prior to issuance of the site permit, the applicant shall obtain approval from TVF&R for the fire protection system and hydrant placement as needed. THE FOLLOWING CONDITIONS SHALL BE SATISFIED PRIOR TO ISSUANCE OF BUILDING PERMITS: • The City Engineer may determine the necessity for,and require submittal and approval of,a construction access and parking plan for the onsite construction phase. If the City Engineer deems such a plan necessary, the applicant shall provide the plan prior to issuance of building permits. THE FOLLOWING CONDITIONS SHALL BE SATISFIED PRIOR TO A FINAL BUILDING INSPECTION: • Connect to public sewer • Connect to the existing water system in accordance with approved plans. Coordinate with the City of Tigard Water Division to coordinate this connection. • Prior to a final building inspection, the applicant shall complete the installation of pervious pavers and infiltration planter. ENGINEERING COMMENTS SDR2011-00003 Schwindt Dental Office PAGE 11 • Prior to final building inspection, the applicant shall complete the installation of all underground service to the development. • Prior to final building inspection, the applicant shall provide the City of Tigard Development Engineer with written confirmation from the professional engineer monitoring the work. The engineer shall certify that the water quality facility has been constructed and completed in conformance with Clean Water Services requirements and the approved plans. • Prior to final building inspection, the applicant shall enter into an agreement with the city on city-furnished forms for maintenance of the private water quality on-site. That agreement will be recorded and the City will be periodically monitoring the facility in the future for compliance with the terms of the maintenance agreement. • Prior to a final building inspection, the applicant shall provide the Development Engineer with one paper copy,and electronic copies in DWG and PDF formats,of the as-built drawings of the water quality treatment facility and any utility connections to the public systems. ENGINEERING COMMENTS SDR2011-00003 Schwindt Dental Office PAGE 12 HLand Use Application REQUEST FOR COMMENTS TO: Police Dept., Plan Review RETURN TO: Hap Watkins DATE SENT: 03-05-2012 DATE DUE: 03-12-2012 PROJECT NAME: CASE NUMBER: SDR2011-00003 PROJECT ADDRESS: 11445 SW Summerfield Dr. PROJECT DESCRIPTION: Schwindt Dental Building Comments? ❑ Yes Comments below or ❑ See Attached Please return plan packet to Hap Watkins AO CahCetilb noted J. JO`c 2-5-to 1 is\curpin\masters\completeness review request.docx TW , It Tualatin Valley Fire & Rescue March 12, 2012 Hap Watkins City of Tigard 13125 SW Hall Blvd Tigard OR 97223 Re: SDR 2011-00003 11445 SW Summerfield Schwindt Dental Building Thank you for the opportunity to review the proposed site plan surrounding the above named development project. Tualatin Valley Fire & Rescue endorses this proposal. If you have questions or need further clarification, please feel free to contact me at 503-259-1504. Sincerely, 20/tov -WOf John Wolff Deputy Fire Marshal II Copy: Case ID# SDR2011-00003 Darrel "Hap" Watkins, 3-10-2012 I am the adjacent property owner of the property at 11445 SW Summerfield Drive. I wanted to express concern over parking for this proposed building. We already have limited parking and hope that ample spaces will be planned for this new space, and also hope that this new building will not crowd the buildings already present in this area. Thank you, Becky Tollenaar RECEIVED 11565 SW Durham RD. Suite F110 MAR 13 2012 Tigard OR 97224 CITY OF TIGARD PLANNING/ENGINEERING CleanWater Services MEMORANDUM Date: March 14, 2012 To: Darrel "Hap" Watkins,r Planning Department, City of Tigard From: Jackie Sue Humphreys, lean Water Services (the District) Subject: Schwindt Medical/Dental Building, SDR2011-00003, 2S110DC00500, 01300 Please include the following comments when writing your conditions of approval: PRIOR TO ANY WORK ON THE SITE A Clean Water Services (the District) Storm Water Connection Permit Authorization must be obtained. Application for the District's Permit Authorization must be in accordance with the requirements of the Design and Construction Standards, Resolution and Order No. 07-20, (or current R&O in effect at time of Engineering plan submittal),and is to include: a. Detailed plans prepared in accordance with Chapter 2, Section 2.04.2.b-1. b. Detailed grading and erosion control plan. An Erosion Control Permit will be required. Area of Disturbance must be clearly identified on submitted construction plans. If site area and any offsite improvements required for this development exceed one-acre of disturbance, project will require a 1200-CN Erosion Control Permit. c. Detailed plans showing each lot within the development having direct access by gravity to public storm and sanitary sewer. d. Provisions for water quality in accordance with the requirements of the above named design standards. Water Quality is required for all new development and redevelopment areas per R&O 07-20, Section 4.05.5, Table 4-1. Access shall be provided for maintenance of facility per R&O 07-20, Section 4.02.4. e. If use of an existing, offsite or regional Water Quality Facility is proposed, it must be clearly identified on plans, showing its location, condition, capacity to treat this site and, any additional improvements and/or upgrades that may be needed to utilize that facility. 2550 SW Hillsboro Highway • Hillsboro,Oregon 97123 Phone: (503)681-3600 • Fax: (503)681-3603 • cleanwaterservices.org f. If private lot LIDA systems proposed, must comply with the current CWS Design and Construction Standards. A private maintenance agreement, for the proposed private lot LIDA systems, needs to be provided to the City for review and acceptance. g. Show all existing and proposed easements on plans. Any required storm sewer, sanitary sewer, and water quality related easements must be granted to the City. h. Application may require additional permitting and plan review from the District's Source Control Program. For any questions or additional information, please contact Source Control at (503) 681-5175. i. Any proposed offsite construction activities will require an update or amendment to the current Service Provider Letter for this project. CONCLUSION This Land Use Review does not constitute the District's approval of storm or sanitary sewer compliance to the NPDES permit held by the District. The District, prior to issuance of any connection permits, must approve final construction plans and drainage calculations. Portland General kw .-ic 9480 SW Boecknan Row% , 746,4„.71A PGE Wilsonville,Oregon 97070 ype II Proposal it Review '-FL-C--j--"-j Case ID: SDR2011-00003 Ralph Reisbeck Office(503(570-4409 Servo'&De.,gn Project Manager Fax(503)570-4420 ntact Information Western Ripon For POE hiveetioa toll(503) 3i+-5450 Wilsonville LCC ralplr reisherl0ygn.rorn 120 days = Monday,July 02,2012 To: Interested Persons Staff Contact: Darrel "Hap"Watkins 503-718-244- -- — - -- - -- If you would like to comment on this proposal, we nee Earth-friendly tips Friday, March 16, 2012 . Please mail or deliver your c 97223. Include the Case ID Number. SDR2011-0000= GreenPowerOregon.com staff person: Darrel"Hap"Watkins. v,�,/ 3--9-/Z Information About the Proposal `s � / -- Description of the Proposal: ey A- v Cm/ �r� /f/ Applicant requests site development approval to construe pie�,, r� r} F 3 E / / ev associated parking and landscaping in a C-G zone. /WFW V�{ Applicant: KASA Architects,Inc. �Q �� V�6' if You Kevin Saxton FE I t- L 4119 SE Cesar E. Chavez Blvd. Q7f Portland,OR 97211 Al/E-; Owner 1: CDBK Properties,LLC 11565 SW Durham Rd.,Bldg. F,S Tigard, OR 97224 /614°/L Proposal Address: 11445 SW Summerfield Drive Legal Washington County Tax Map 2S1 t,t Description: \ f i r Zoning. C-G:General Commercial Distric /,1 Approval Criteria: Tigard Development Code TDCI /\ -GE/ C''' What You Should Know About This Type II Proposal Pi.,;,,.,,,, 5,,,,,,,;,,,,,,,(,„your,iauno The proposed development requires a land use review. P".111"'"'""'"'"'”` ',•time r,,c„,ia„r wed..&corGrn,a,.,.,;, to participate early in the decision-making process by 31./6.1.14.1.....8 ,.........�..- __ ..___o CP ■ comment period. RECEIVED MAR 2 2 2012 CITY OF TIGARD p1ANNING/ENGINEERING City of Tigard,Community Development Division 13125 SW Hall Blvd.,Tigard,Oregon 97223 • RINf- ,58:6 r-1 1 1E (N= 1 rE 1r�= • 80.5. as 8 5 �__--------- --- \_ lE 8" SS _ _--- --- -_ ,� ----------- -- — _8:_ _ p --,o r ___ ------__----_-- - - - ��--�-P- - - ��r� - - - -�• M \' / • i...._ _1 I / ) r ---------------------____2___- , . 9 ` — - - �—. • • \ r l i \i ,1 \ v '' - - C C C L fisbt5) \\; c,./).„ e oxy \.....\ ; To ` _ _ 4 0 , r ®v 1 \ tg 1 ( I-1872\- tx ir 11. __. / ''.:,....> \ NO,- - I %\74f*Q:11 $1i •, � 1 r CO I I pi X ` �� I © 6 PVC PIPE I \ I i ji � .M. °"T- c .may 14 --s - Las —� ° / • •7 .&- .A--" . . • ••.,'I 61.7', PirdelIMINSIOilirr 1 t .1 :. 1 I l .. i •.� Lei � � -�• //( „ 4 ' S . 4° f � `. � � `- — '187-- =� `�8��. . i!( • �V� Irk �' if ra Nk,....,L.4 / / \ -t �� r r _ _ 1�/Q 1 ( T 1 \ . t I� ,14 , "%I.., lif...‘.6,, 0 • � . — _ — —189— '-- -1,/ / is , _ ir/ 9 � I —___ _., ,. 0 . -... ,. X :._..,- --z-..-- .... .... - a, 8 . - -r,..-4- 1. . - — `4' 71, _ ....71,.. 1 .• ; ;:t • d • • . .1.:•,C:7. . 7714 Il 4. • 4 . -1g0 . . . ::71,18 -.}r.sp ' ,:y S P DURHAM RD. • ocisTIN G 25-WA I W /240 V I P l' e", Wi PH -� 1 sotiv 3 � 11,56s- p/ U�p _. CONSTRUCTION NOTES / Jj'/ PAM it. H _o O INSTALL AREA DRAIN. ZE DETAIL ON SHEET CI.; m r•-)' 0 ® INSTALL STOW SEAS P1PF_' 33 ° m 0 Abe ISO 72 3-L AL-DS 133 800A 3-350 KCM AL XL' 6-350 KCM AL XL" ABC 150 818 � 1 -2/0 CU BSD 'le l ...Aga 2-2/0 CU BSD 1, 3-350 KCM AL XLP TOTA OF 2 R NS PD 08800 1 -2/0 CU BSD 9�, IN 1 -4' C . O. ONDUIT v'( ,9 3- 50 KCM A XLP O1 34-`1} AL-D= RECEIVED 1 2/0 CU BO 00231 / J631 =3 :LP tO �QJ PL07018 ,0� MAR 222012 3S0 ¢/ VT 08801 P�- • ? - TOTAL ' ■ - . 4 ' -� CIIYOFTiGAfso 500A IN 1 -4' C . 0 . COND PLANNING/ENGINEERING � a `� VT 08012 -2/0 AL-DB / /. Iwo 86 ■ ( L XLP 3\41� �\��7-, J542972490 AL XL-6 1 /0 PSG 2 _ � . 4 2004-20 .� A:C-2/0 AL ' JKJ ►ft VT Oi 88 frcPofto De ;����•. 3 P � 400A //r 3u�t.Di�6 07019 4ctrV .-- --- - - - - -•---- 4l J♦ 3-2OOA J60200-73 1981 -25 ,�: E.- F IAL25 II" 44•L. 7�.: = -2 •L-DB - - JW0535-90 07020 PD 00 �� J60•'0-73 1974-25 '-N 4. ,�' ,, SW DURHAM RD 2-1 /0 ��.� _ ^ ! .B 25 530142 1 /0 4/0 01844- G 00019 �r 1/0 r 4 00232/ 1990125 01844- S�/ 1991 -25 I • • : ... i - 4 ►�} 07017 4 PL 07019 I 44- 0029:/2 AL-0114' Of , 01843/ VT 0 . 86 2 Q Paz A -DB PL 07021 1990 tiT 0 9— l0C II . . . iv 15B 1-57"- 6-750 KCM-AL ------------•--- - - - - - - - - - - - _ - - - - - (��i-f 55055-79 0, : - 4- - 4 g _ LIP---- - ROAD VT 00002 PL o0/UZ RH c• rso __ VT 09321 01844- I 19864 30 ABC-21 AL-DB �, e?97017 IlImm VT 09320 ---1 ,, I VT 000 p ) 'IRK 1 I VAAJ L� �^ I 16200 -�6� I�� P�-o I 72OOA • ABC-2 AL DB v p 3 w` 00165/ /Z� 4/C 035p4,54. 1 A F. ntaq • ABC 112 . 5 = = 1 ABC 112 . 5 915 � . 3 AL XL I 1 -2 CU BSD J55055-79 ABC-2 AL-DB , � I Scale: 1 su= 50 ft Q# o55- / 7 /►7 --10D Field (ow 1//A //' /�till _ r', 1...M ni�- n /' 2`//1 I 1 U 1. C�l�I V CITY OF TIGARD REQUEST FOR CC -NTS nuiIFICATION LIST FOR LAND USE & COMMUNITY DEYELOh,rNT APPLICATIONS FILE NOS.: FILE NAME: CITY OFFICES _C.D.ADMINISTRATION'Ron Bunch,CD Director X DEVELOPMENT SERVICES/Todd Prager,Assoc.Planner/Arborist _PUBLIC WORKS/Ted Kyle,City Engineer _C.D.ADMINISTRATION'Susan Hartnett,Asst.CD Director _BUILDING DIVISION/Mark VanDomelen,Building Official _HEARINGS OFFICER(+2 sets) _CITY ADMINISTRATIONICathy Wheatley,City Recorder _POLICE DEPARTMENT/Jim Wolf,Crime Prevention Officer PLANNING COMMISSION(+12 sets) 2 DEVELOPMENT SERVICES/Planning-Engineering Techs. _PUBLIC WORKS/Brian Rager,Assistant PW Director X FILE/REFERENCE pins) / X DEVELOPMENT SERVICES/Gus Duenas,Development Eng._PUBLIC WORKS/Steve Martin,Parks Manager SPECIAL DISTRICTS I _ TUAL.HILLS PARK&REC.DIST.*X TUALATIN VALLEY FIRE&RESCUE* _ TUALATIN VALLEY WATER DISTRICT* L` CLEAN WATER SERVICES* Planning Manager North Division Administrative Office Development Services Department 15707 SW Walker Road John Wolff,Deputy Fire Marshall 1850 SW 170th Avenue David Schweitzer/SWM Program cg- Beaverton,OR 97006 14480 SW Jenkins Road Beaverton,OR 97006 2550 SW Hillsboro Highway Beaverton,OR 97005-1152 Hillsboro,OR 97123 LOCAL AND STATE JURISDICTIONS u // /7 CITY OF BEAVERTON * _ CITY OF TUALATIN* _OR.DEPT.OF FISH&WILDLIFE _OR.DIV.OF STATE LANDS — Planning Manager Planning Manager Elizabeth Ruther,Habitat Biologist Melinda Wood Will Form Required) — Steven Sparks,Den.Svcs.Manager 18880 SW Martinazzi Avenue North Willamette Watershed District 775 Summer Street NE,Suite 100 PO Box 4755 Tualatin,OR 97062 18330 NW Sauvie Island Road Salem,OR 97301-1279 Beaverton,OR 97076 Portland,OR 97231 _ OR.PUB.UTILITIES COMM. METRO-LAND USE&PLANNING * _OR.DEPT.OF GEO.&MINERAL IND. 550 Capitol Street NE 3 _ CITY OF DURHAM #s 600 NE Grand Avenue 800 NE Oregon Street,Suite 5 Salem,OR 97310-1380 City Manager Portland,OR 97232-2736 Portland,OR 97232 17160 SW Upper Boones Fry.Rd. _ Joanna Mensher,Data Resource Center(ZCA-Adopted) _US ARMY CORPS.OF ENG. Durham,OR 97224 _ Paulette Copperstone,(ZCA-RFC Only) _OR.DEPT.OF LAND CONSERV.&DVLP Kathryn Harris(Maps a cwt Letter only) _ 0.Gerald Uba,Ph.D.,(cPaocNzoN) Mara UIIOa(Comp.Plan Amendments d Measure 37) Routing CENWP-OP-G CITY OF KING CITY* 635 Capitol Street NE,Suite 150 PO Box 2946 City Manager Salem,OR 97301-2540 Portland,OR 97208-2946 15300 SW 116th Avenue King City,OR 97224 WASHINGTON COUNTY _ OR.DEPT.OF ENERGY(Powernnes in Area) OR.DEPT OF AVIATION(Monopole Towers) Dept.of Land Use&Transp. Bonneville Power Administration Tom Highland,Planning 155 N.First Avenue — CITY OF LAKE OSWEGO * Routing TTRC–Attn: Renae Ferrera 3040 25th Street,SE Suite 350,MS 13 Planning Director PO Box 3621 Salem,OR 97310 Hillsboro.OR 97124 PO Box 369 Portland,OR 97208-3621 i Naomi Vogel-Beattie(General AN Lake Oswego,OR 97034 _Brent Curtis(CPA) _ OR.DEPT.OF ENVIRON.QUALITY(DEQ) ODOT,REGION 1 tit —Assessment&Taxation(ZCA)MS 9 —CITY OF PORTLAND (Notify for Wetlands and Potential Environmental Impacts) _Development Review Coordinator _Done Mate)a,cartography(ZCA)MS 14 Planning Bureau Director Regional Administrator _Carl Torland, Right-of-Way Section(vacations) 1900 SW 4th Avenue,Suite 4100 2020 SW Fourth Avenue,Suite 400 123 NW Flanders Portland,OR 97201 Portland.OR 97201-4987 Portland,OR 97209-4037 _OR.PARKS&REC.DEPT. _WA.CO.CONSOL.COMM.AGNCY I ODOT,REGION 1 -DISTRICT 2A tit _ODOT,RAIL DIVISION STATE HISTORIC Dave Austin(wcccA)"911"9waop.t.Towers) Chad Gordon,Assistant Distncl Manager (Notify if ODOT R/R-Hwy.Crossing is Only Access to Land) PRESERVATION OFFICE PO Box 6375 6000 SW Raab Road Dave Lanning,Sr Crossing Safety Specialist (Notify if Properly Has HD Overlay) Beaverton,OR 97007-0375 Portland,OR 97221 555-13th Street,NE,Suite 3 725 Sumner St.NE,Suite C Salem,OR 97301-4179 Salem,OR 97301 UTILITY PROVIDERS AND SPECIAL AGENCIES _PORTLAND WESTERN RIR, BURLINGTON NORTHERN/SANTA FE R/R,OREGON ELECTRIC R/R(Burlington Northern/Santa Fe RJR Predecessor) Bruce Carswell,President&General Manager 200 Hawthorne Avenue SE,Suite C320 Salem,OR 97301-5294 —SOUTHERN PACIFIC TRANS.CO.R/R _METRO AREA COMMUNICATIONS COMCAST CABLE CORP. TRI•MET TRANSIT DVLPMT. Clifford C. Cabe,Construction Engineer Debra Palmer(Annexations Only) Gerald Backhaus(s«Map r.,Area Contact) (I(Project is WAhin'/.Mile of a Transit Route) 5424 SE McLoughlin Boulevard Twin Oaks Technology Center 14200 SW Brigadoon Court Ben Baldwin,Project Planner (y Portland,OR 97232 1815 NW 169th Place,S-6020 Beaverton,OR 97005 710 NE Holladay Street Beaverton,OR 97006-4886 Portland,OR 97232 7C PORTLAND GENERAL ELECTRIC Z.NW NATURAL GAS COMPANY _VERIZON 4 QWEST COMMUNICATIONS Mike Hieb Svc.Design Consultant Scott Palmer,Engineering Coord. John Cousineau,OSP Network Lynn Smith,Eng.ROW Mgr. 9480 SW Boeckman Road 220 NW Second Avenue 4155 SW Cedar Hills Blvd. 8021 SW Capitol Hill Rd,Rm 110 Wilsonville,OR 97070 Portland,OR 97209-3991 Beaverton,OR 97005 Portland,OR 97219 _TIGARD/TUALATIN SCHOOL DIST.#23J_BEAVERTON SCHOOL DIST.#48 4COMCAST CABLE CORP. _COMCAST CABLE COMMUNIC. Teri Brady,Administrative Offices Jennifer Garland,Demographics Alex Silantiev ts..M.p for A,..d.nt.g, Brian Every(App.ean..rn wawa 6960 SW Sandburg Street 16550 SW Merlo Road 9605 SW Nimbus Avenue,Bldg. 12 10831 SW Cascade Avenue Tigard,OR 97223-8039 Beaverton,OR 97006-5152 Beaverton,OR 97008 Tigard,OR 97223-4203 11t INDICATES AUTOMATIC NOTIFICATION IN COMPLIANCE WITH INTERGOVERNMENTAL AGREEMENT IF WITHIN 500'OF THE SUIJEQ PROPERTY FOR ANY/ALL CITY PROJECTS (Project Planner Is Responsible For Indicating Parties To NotiFYJ. h:1pattylmasterslRequest For Comments Notification List.doc (UPDATED: 12-Jul-11) (Also update:ilcurpinl setup\labels\annexationslannexation utilities and franchises.doc,mailing labels&auto text when updating this document) MAILING / NOTIFICATION RECORDS NI AFFIDAVIT OF MAILING TIGARD I, Darrel G Watkins, being first duly sworn/affirm, on oath depose and say that I am a Livability Compliance Specialist for the City of Tigard,Washington County, Oregon and that I served the following: © NOTICE OF PENDING LAND USE DECISION FOR: SDR2011-00003 Schwindt Medical/Dental Office Building A copy of the said notice being hereto attached, marked Exhibit "A", and by reference made a part hereof, was mailed to each named person(s) at the address(s) shown on the attached list(s), marked Exhibit "B", and by reference made a part hereof,on March 2,2012,and deposited in the United States Mail on March 2,2012,postage prepaid. 16101 11 (Person i Prepared Notice) STATE OF OREGON County of Washington ss. City of Tigard Subscribed and sworn/affirmed before me on the 2 day of ,2012. NESTE J PURIM NOT Y PUBL�COF OREGON NOTARY PUBLIC-OREGON COMMISSION NO. 450737 My Commission Expires: 28, .10/...5— NY COMMISSION EXPIRES AT 21,MIS Notice of a Type II Proposal EXHIBIT4 Site Development Review T I G A R D New Construction - Case ID: SDR2011-00003 Tigard Community Development Contact Information Date of Notice: Friday,March 02, 2012 120 days = Monday,July 02, 2012 To: Interested Persons Staff Contact: Darrel "Hap" Watkins 503-718-2440 HAP @tigard-or.gov If you would like to comment on this proposal, we need to receive your written comments by 5 p.m. on Friday, March 16, 2012 . Please mail or deliver your comments to 13125 SW Hall Blvd., Tigard, Oregon 97223. Include the Case ID Number: SDR2011-00003. Please address your comments to the appropriate staff person: Darrel "Hap" Watkins. Information About the Proposal Description of the Proposal: Applicant requests site development approval to construct a 3,815 sq. ft. medical/dental office building with associated parking and landscaping in a C-G zone. Applicant: KASA Architects, Inc. Kevin Saxton 4119 SE Cesar E. Chavez Blvd. Portland, OR 97211 Owner 1: CDBK Properties,LLC 11565 SW Durham Rd.,Bldg. F, Suite 100 Tigard, OR 97224 Proposal Address: 11445 SW Summerfield Drive Legal Washington County Tax Map 2S110DC,Tax Parcels 00500 and 01300. Description: Zoning: C-G: General Commercial District Approval Criteria: Tigard Development Code TDC18.390.090 What You Should Know About This Type II Proposal The proposed development requires a land use review. The goal of this notice is to invite interested parties to participate early in the decision-making process by submitting comments in writing during the open comment period. City of Tigard,Community Development Division•13125 SW Hall Blvd.,Tigard,Oregon 97223 Type II decisions are made L., the Community Development Directs._ after consideration of relevant evidence and public comments received during the open comment period. The decision will be mailed to the applicant and to owners of property located within 500 feet of the proposal site and anyone who submitted written comments or is otherwise entitled to a decision notice. The decision maker may: • Approve the proposal. • Approve the proposal with conditions. • Deny the proposal. All evidence considered in the decision will be contained in the public record and available for public review. If you would like to review this material, please schedule an appointment with Lora Garland, Records Management Specialist, 503-718-2483. If you wish to receive copies of the materials, city records will prepare them for you at a reasonable cost. Appeal Information Failure of any party to address the relevant approval criteria with sufficient specificity may preclude subsequent appeals to the Land Use Board of Appeals or Circuit Court on that issue. Comments directed at the relevant approval criteria (Tigard Municipal Code) are what constitute relevant evidence. Details regarding the appeal process and requirements are contained within Tigard Municipal Code Chapter 18.390. There is a fee charged for appeals. Attachments Included in this Notice Zoning and site map. Notice to Mortgagee, Lienholder,Vendor, or Seller The Tigard Development Code requires that if you receive this notice it shall be promptly forwarded to the purchaser. City of Tigard,Community Development Division•13125 SW Hall Blvd.,Tigard,Oregon 97223 C.) C ��, !_ , B B F B .BB B B B B B�,�, '�' B 5 ;! T :=_ otified (500 F..n ', B B C�- • ` BBBB r nKin '4 .', Schwindt Dental Office cg co rn ,-t A... 8 B op°it ______15: g - • e 0.# ,,N,T,i, -:i. ril hp\s, 0 i t--I \ \ ,t. \ EBB B�j If/ j�. n BBB o °' . BB �° � Subject Site 111 ° � BB I BB BE // Q AISANNI I W \\\\\\\I DURHAM RD Property ov.ner information is valid N s\ for 3 months from the date pooled on `i this map M ____ CA td C ii W \ 'Mormon.,on IAS map is ler ,Mallon \� �.' \ 1t f only and shoed a wiw.wM Development (to r MMii ry ( N Servisee Milan_ „. ..... . .... . ..,. .. .. .. . . .._. cro / "num o it �, V la f, COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DEPMTM1ENT imii lV , '.` 'tes w nr t2a IN t.4 0 e 710 n 0 N o co lVICINITY MAP �77 n R-4.5 R-40 , R-12 °, ` R-12 (PD) , — ( R-3.6 10,000 sq ft lot /V J R4.5 7,500 sq ft lot ` ��,'4*y R-75,000sgftlot a) ��' I R-3.5 R-12 3,050 sq ft lot ES ,� ? R-25 1,480 sq ft lot n + - - R-40 40 units per acre 1 C-G General Commercial n R-3.5 (PD) PD Planned Development ni x ffr- Schwindt Dental Office t C r--., R-7 ro o -- �1; R-25 (PD)' .r� C7 Subject Site 5 W . . R-7 (PD) N cn C I tZ • R-2 C Intawawn on Vus map n tor genera Ioear.on R J o arM NouM be nWf,.d wdh me Q. y 1 atn landga Dlweion I ,; Approz Scab 1.8.000•1 n=Bel h I 2 I Map Pnntad at al 08 NMI on tT2aMar-1 a j i. R-4.5 (PDi O fg (Ay at Irpard D 13125NJHalt S d l o Feet tic MP> T 3d OR 97223 P o tom R-2 (PD) 50639°171 vw Ipd-x pw • „ t I) J IQ N W a TUALATIN H S PARK& REC. DISTRICT CLEAN WATER SERVICES EXHIBIT ATTN:PLAN • ` MANAGER Development Services Department 15707 SW W KER 'OAD Attn:David Schweitzer/SWM Program BEAVERT t OR 97 6 2550 SW Hillsboro Highway Hillsboro,OR 97123 CITY OF KING CITY WASHINGTON COUNTY,OREGON LAND USE& ATTN:CITY MANAGER TRANSPORTATION 15300 SW 116Th AVENUE ATTN: NAOMI VOGEL-BEATTIE KING CITY OR 97224 155 N FIRST AVE,STE 350,MS 13 HILLSBORO OR 97124 ODOT—REGION 1,DIST 2A COMCAST CABLE CORPORATION CHAD GORDON,ASST.DISTRICT MGR. ATTN:ALEX SILANTIEV 6000 SW RAAB ROAD 9605 SW NIMBUS AVE.,BLDG. 12 PORTLAND OR 97221 BEAVERTON OR 97008 TM-MET TRANSIT DEVELOPMENT PORTLAND GENERAL ELECTRIC BEN BALDWIN,PROJECT PLANNER ATTN:MIKE HIEB 710 NE HOLLADAY STREET 9480 SW BOECKMAN ROAD PORTLAND OR 97232 WILSONVILLE OR 97070 NORTHWEST NATURAL GAS COMCAST CABLE CORPORATION ATTN: SCOTT PALMER ATTN:GERALD BACKHAUS ENGINEERING COORDINATOR 14200 SW BRIGADOON CT 220 NW 2ND AVENUE BEAVERTON OR 97005 PORTLAND OR 97209-3991 QWEST COMMUNICATIONS LYNN SMITH,ENG. ROW MGR. 8021 SW CAPITOL HILL RD RM 110 PORTLAND OR 97219 2S115BA00100 2S115 BO 800 ALBERTSON'S INC EXECUTIVE PENSIO SN PR ERTIES PARTNERSHIP BY ALBERTSONS INC#565 1121 §, ALMON ST ATTN:TAX DEPT POR;FLAN ,OR 97205 PO BOX 20 BOISE,ID 83726 2S115BA00102 2S110DC00300 ARCHLAND PROPERTY I LLC SSC PROPERTY HOLDINGS INC BY DOUBLE K VENTURES INC DEPT-PT-OR-08235 8255 SW HUNZIKER ST#101 PO BOX 25025 TIGARD,OR 97223 GLENDALE,CA 91201 2S110DC00600 2S110DC01000 CONGREGATE CARE ASSET V LP SUMMERFIELD ASSOCIATES,LLC BY THOMSON REUTERS INC BY HSC REAL ESTATE 2235 FARADAY AVE,STE 0 1500 SW FIRST AVE STE 1020 CARLSBAD,CA 92008 PORTLAND,OR 97201 2S110DCO2400 2S110DCO2500 DRT PROPERTIES LLC SUMMERFIELD CIVIC ASSOCIATION 9805 SW CHOCTAW ST 10650 SW SUMMERFIELD DR TUALATIN,OR 97062 TIGARD,OR 97223 2S110DCO2300 2S110DC00700 HIP WILLOWBROOK LLC TIGARD RETIREMENT RESIDENCE LLC BY HARSCH INVESTMENT CORP BY THOMSON REUTERS INC PO BOX 270$ 2235 FARADAY AVE,STE 0 PORTLAND,OR 97208 CARLSBAD,CA 92008 2S115AB01901 2S110CD07600 IBJ WHITEHALL BANK&TRUST CO TR TOBIAS INVESTMENT CO BY ALBERTSON'S INC 1900 SW RIVER DR#1101 ATTN.TAX DEPT PORTLAND,OR 97201 PO BOX 20 BOISE,ID 83726 2 110DC• 300 2S110CD00105 LU 'N 'OBERT C UNITED STATES NATIONAL BANK OF 0 %KV' NLAND,ERIC B BY US BANK PROPERTIES 114• S UMMERFIELD DR 2800 EAST LAKE ST TI ARD,OR •7224 MINNEAPOLIS,MN 55406 2S110DC00500 LUTON,ROBERT C %KVERNLAND,ERIC B 11445 SW SUMMERFIELD DR TIGARD,OR 97224 2S115BA02500 SN PROPERTIES PARTNERSHIP 1121 SW SALMON ST PORTLAND,OR 97205 2S115AB 900 SN PRO TIES PARTNERSHIP 1121S SA MONST PORTI,AND,OR 97205 • Josh Thomas Susan Beilke 10395 SW Bonanza 11755 SW 114th Place Tigard, OR 97224 Tigard, OR 97223 Gretchen Buehner David Walsh 13249 SW 136th Place 10236 SW Stuart Court Tigard, OR 97224 Tigard, OR 97223 Shannen Williams Rappold .Marketing/Business Development Manager fatty Newth Per.lo Construction 1218(SW Merestone Court 7190 SW Sandburg Street Tigard, OR 97223 Portland,,OR 97223 g ' Tim Esau Heidi Brenneman PO Box 230695 11680 SW Tigard Drive Tigard, OR 97281 Tigard, OR 97223 CPO 48 16200 SW Pacific.Highway, Suite 11242 Tigard, OR 97224 Ross Sundberg 16382 SW 104th Avenue Tigard, OR 97224 Brian Wegener 9830 SW Kimberly Drive Tigard, OR 97224 Todd Harding and Blake Hering Jr. Norris Beggs & Simpson 121 SW Morrison, Suite 200 Portland, OR 97204 Rex Caffall 13205 SW Village Glenn Tigard, OR 97223 John brewing 7110 SW Lola Lane. Tigard, OR 97223 (FIT OF TIGARD -SOUTH INTERESTED PARTIES (pg. I of I) (i:\curpin\setup\labels\CIT South.doc) UPDATED 1-.10-11 TUALATIN H S PARK& REC. DISTRICT CLEAN WATER SERVICES ATTN: PLAN ` MANAGER Development Services Department 15707 SW VG' KER 'OAD Attn: David Schweitzer/SWM Program BEAVERT• OR 971 i6 2550 SW Hillsboro Highway Hillsboro,OR 97123 CITY OF KING CITY WASHINGTON COUNTY, OREGON LAND USE & ATTN: CITY MANAGER TRANSPORTATION 15300 SW 116TH AVENUE ATTN: NAOMI VOGEL-BEATTIE KING CITY OR 97224 155 N FIRST AVE,STE 350,MS 13 HILLSBORO OR 97124 ODOT—REGION 1,DIST 2A COMCAST CABLE CORPORATION CHAD GORDON,ASST.DISTRICT MGR. ATTN:ALEX SILANTIEV 6000 SW RAAB ROAD 9605 SW NIMBUS AVE.,BLDG. 12 PORTLAND OR 97221 BEAVERTON OR 97008 TRI-MET TRANSIT DEVELOPMENT PORTLAND GENERAL ELECTRIC BEN BALDWIN,PROJECT PLANNER ATTN:MIKE HIEB 710 NE HOLLADAY STREET 9480 SW BOECKMAN ROAD PORTLAND OR 97232 WILSONVILLE OR 97070 NORTHWEST NATURAL GAS COMCAST CABLE CORPORATION ATTN: SCOTT PALMER ATTN:GERALD BACKHAUS ENGINEERING COORDINATOR 14200 SW BRIGADOON CT 220 NW 2ND AVENUE BEAVERTON OR 97005 PORTLAND OR 97209-3991 QWEST COMMUNICATIONS LYNN SMITH, ENG. ROW MGR. 8021 SW CAPITOL HILL RD RM 110 PORTLAND OR 97219 4115BA00100 2S115 B0 800 ALBERTSON'S INC EXECUTIVE PENSIO SN PR ERTIES PARTNERSHIP BY ALBERTSONS INC#565 1121 S' ALMON ST ATTN:TAX DEPT POR/LAN ,OR 97205 PO BOX 20 BOISE,ID 83726 2S115BA00102 2S110DC00300 ARCHLAND PROPERTY I LLC SSC PROPERTY HOLDINGS INC BY DOUBLE K VENTURES INC DEPT-PT-OR-08235 8255 SW HUNZIKER ST#101 PO BOX 25025 TIGARD,OR 97223 GLENDALE,CA 91201 2S110DC00600 2S110DC01000 CONGREGATE CARE ASSET V LP SUMMERFIELD ASSOCIATES,LLC BY THOMSON REUTERS INC BY HSC REAL ESTATE 2235 FARADAY AVE,STE 0 1500 SW FIRST AVE STE 1020 CARLSBAD,CA 92008 PORTLAND,OR 97201 2S110DCO2400 2S110DCO2500 DRT PROPERTIES LLC SUMMERFIELD CIVIC ASSOCIATION 9805 SW CHOCTAW ST 10650 SW SUMMERFIELD DR TUALATIN,OR 97062 TIGARD,OR 97223 2S110DCO2300 2S110DC00700 HIP WILLOWBROOK LLC TIGARD RETIREMENT RESIDENCE LLC BY HARSCH INVESTMENT CORP BY THOMSON REUTERS INC PO BOX 270$ 2235 FARADAY AVE,STE 0 PORTLAND,OR 97208 CARLSBAD,CA 92008 2S115AB01901 2S110CD07600 IBJ WHITEHALL BANK&TRUST CO TR TOBIAS INVESTMENT CO BY ALBERTSON'S INC 1900 SW RIVER DR#1101 ATTN:TAX DEPT PORTLAND,OR 97201 PO BOX 20 BOISE,ID 83726 2 110DC• 300 2S110CD00105 LU • N 'OBERT C UNITED STATES NATIONAL BANK OF 0 %KV"NLAND,ERIC B BY US BANK PROPERTIES 114' S UMMERFIELD DR 2800 EAST LAKE ST TI ARD,OR •7224 MINNEAPOLIS,MN 55406 2S110DC00500 LUTON,ROBERT C %KVERNLAND,ERIC B 11445 SW SUMMERFIELD DR TIGARD,OR 97224 2S115BA02500 SN PROPERTIES PARTNERSHIP 1121 SW SALMON ST PORTLAND,OR 97205 2S115AB 900 SN PRO TIES PARTNERSHIP 1121 S SALMON ST PORTLAND,OR 97205 Josh Thomas Susan Bcilkc 10395 SW Bonanza 11755 SW 114th Place Tigard, OR 97224 Tigard, OR 97223 Gretchen Buehner David Walsh 13249 SW 136th Place 10236 SW Stuart Court Tigard, OR 97224 Tigard, OR 97223 Shannen Williams Rap.poll Marketing/Business Development Manager Patty Newth Perko Construction 1 21 80 SW Merestone Court 7190 SW Sandburg Street Tigard, ()R 97223 Pordand,.(_)R 97223 Tim Esau Heidi Brenneman PO Box 230695 11680 SW Tigard Drive Tigard, OR 97281 Tigard, OR 97223 CPO 4B 16200 SW Pacific Highway, Suite 11242 Tigard, OR 97224 Ross Sundberg 16382 SW 104th Avenue Tigard, OR 97224 Brian Wegener 9830 SW Kimberly Drive Tigard, OR 97224 Todd Harding and Blake Hering Jr. Norris Beggs & Simpson 121 SW Morrison, Suite 200 Portland, OR 97204 Rex Caffall 13205 SW Village Glenn Tigard, OR 97223 John Frewing 7110 SW Lola Lane Tigard, ()R 97223 CITY OF TIGARD - SOUTH INTERESTED PARTIES (pg. I of I) 0.1curpin\setup\labels\CIT South.doc) UPDATED: 1-Jul-11 •` . $11 -.." Notice of a Type II Proposal Site Development Review TIGAR 7; New Construction - Case ID: SDR2011-00003 Tigard Community Development Contact Information Date of Notice: Friday, March 02, 2012 120 days = Monday,July 02, 2012 To: Interested Persons Staff Contact: Darrel "Hap" Watkins 503-718-2440 HAP @tigard-or.gov If you would like to comment on this proposal, we need to receive your written comments by 5 p.m. on Friday, March 16, 2012 . Please mail or deliver your comments to 13125 SW Hall Blvd., Tigard, Oregon 97223. Include the Case ID Number: SDR2011-00003. Please address your comments to the appropriate staff person: Darrel "Hap" Watkins. Information About the Proposal Description of the Proposal: Applicant requests site development approval to construct a 3,815 sq. ft. medical/dental office building with associated parking and landscaping in a C-G zone. Applicant: KASA Architects, Inc. Kevin Saxton 4119 SE Cesar E. Chavez Blvd. Portland, OR 97211 Owner 1: CDBK Properties,LLC 11565 SW Durham Rd., Bldg. F,Suite 100 Tigard, OR 97224 Proposal Address: 11445 SW Summerfield Drive Legal Washington County Tax Map 2S110DC,Tax Parcels 00500 and 01300. Description: Zoning: C-G: General Commercial District Approval Criteria: Tigard Development Code TDC18.390.090 What You Should Know About This Type II Proposal The proposed development requires a land use review. The goal of this notice is to invite interested parties to participate early in the decision-making process by submitting comments in writing during the open comment period. City of Tigard,Community Development Division •13125 SW Hall Blvd.,Tigard,Oregon 97223 Type II decisions are made L, the Community Development Direct., after consideration of relevant evidence and public comments received during the open comment period. The decision will be mailed to the applicant and to owners of property located within 500 feet of the proposal site and anyone who submitted written comments or is otherwise entitled to a decision notice.The decision maker may: • Approve the proposal. • Approve the proposal with conditions. • Deny the proposal. All evidence considered in the decision will be contained in the public record and available for public review. If you would like to review this material, please schedule an appointment with Lora Garland, Records Management Specialist, 503-718-2483. If you wish to receive copies of the materials, city records will prepare them for you at a reasonable cost. Appeal Information Failure of any party to address the relevant approval criteria with sufficient specificity may preclude subsequent appeals to the Land Use Board of Appeals or Circuit Court on that issue. Comments directed at the relevant approval criteria (Tigard Municipal Code) are what constitute relevant evidence. Details regarding the appeal process and requirements are contained within Tigard Municipal Code Chapter 18.390. There is a fee charged for appeals. Attachments Included in this Notice Zoning and site map. Notice to Mortgagee,Lienholder,Vendor, or Seller The Tigard Development Code requires that if you receive this notice it shall be promptly forwarded to the purchaser. City of Tigard,Community Development Division.13125 SW Hall Blvd.,Tigard,Oregon 97223 • n (n o i ►-• / / �� I B B S B. W CD P I 4,4, HEAL 8 B B B t: � o B B _ --r-r. Area Notified (500 Ft) 4 Era B o c •••N B IR BBB B �� . / ' �` BBD'S ,.GN �;'' CDBK Properties,LLC a a it T0h1t51 Office O ro 1 �A Cl• C 7, h..\,, .\ I •,)## INS IV-- „Y py .,.,, ..,- N... ..,.. _. , P 47 to \. BBBB oo'• P. L. ` BB SERB ® Subject Site � \\�\ DURHAM RD W \ \\ \- _`\ ` ' for r3 months from tfhe date minted on 1.71 41 td 'S Map Pnntea D?W 1.^ P- �`\`�`` 1 , inbrm.uon on tH,map,a b pm.-a�baton i J �,a�sho,a� ,edt�Development Servoces(*soon Tt -9 / /41111111111 cro .a. ' COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT• DEPARTMENT 1k N ► . ,P o 13125 SW nM time •omS rg.,O m a/2 t W 0 u mot _ — w3ev.t++ o 0 p -. ■to "• 0Q F VICINITY MAP n R-4.5 R-40 R-12 4 oors R-12 (P D) a`,►r r J.r R-3.5 10.000 sq ft lot ►d '" °- — - R4.5 7,500 sq ft lot +�« '-r i r R-7 5,000 sq ft lot so r9 >° ? ' ,�+•maa R1C•:^SR-3.5 R-12 3,050 sq ft lot ¢ p { R-25 1,480 sq ft lot o j,_ ',r; � ---a R-40 40 units per acre 1 C-G General Commercial 9 R-3.5 (PD) PD Planned Development Schwindt Dental Office eY r — — — co 4 H Subject Site W �f�F7` ol f. `-• yn K;3s _ - —_ Nn n '•. .0 + :f:Rags�r, �. .'� ,t-`�. : r r}j a+'r.'' 1 'n f _.. -- - f" ——ct;f4••Y a 1 W .,,4; i"a J ] +a. {1 ,1,-9 'mss" „•� f•-4'it.' .r r , E 1 ieiormanen settle map n ter gene,.,ocx•on ta Y7+ s ! aI ,' I Dory en0 WOW a wM.w wrth Na Z. r 'r''�'. a if t, � � •*. S -'. Dr.NOparant Senecas W.n•on. L t 34x?� ri �r f :�1. .� 1 v' "ppm scarraan in=sert h-j L/ - Nap ormhtl at 0'.05 f+M o-TS Mar.': 66 e j R-4:5 (RD) ro Qfeet —A. ---i Gh Ur,ymC 0 I 0 1000 MA� wif3�aapi R-2 (P D1 rill! v - •,� T ....v.. p [V r f N W 9 City of Tigard 1 Land Use Permit Application PRE-APP.HELD BY: AAP 41.0k1.011 VikIlli1P-lb File# ✓' 61,261/ -O'Q13 Other Case# t-- 17gcs . LO ii . 00 V je Date ifill By i\.-54 Receipt# 1 I �g ? Fee r wv 7e "'Date Complete TYPE OF PERMIT YOU ARE APPLYING FOR ❑Adjustment/Variance (I or II) ❑Historic Overlay(II or III) Site Development Review(II) ❑ Comprehensive Plan Amendment(IV) ❑ Home Occupation(II) ❑Subdivision(II or III) ❑ Conditional Use(III) ❑Minor Land Partition(II) ❑Zone Change(III) ❑ Development Code Amendment(IV) ❑ Planned Development(HI) ❑Zone Change Annexation(IV) ❑ Downtown Design Review(II,III) ❑Sensitive Lands Review(I,II or III) LOCATION WHERE PROPOSED ACTIVITY WILL OCCUR(Address if available) l fklds sV,l �riELD DX. TAX MAPS&TAX I.OT NOS. '26 ((CL .. cxno0 i o13oo TOTAL SITE SIZE ZONING CLASSIFICATION ► tir16 .i{L c-4 C't lin APPLICANT' KIENI 1 id 5A,(ro,s ■sA Ag.al rite_ - 1 146. MAILING ADDRESS/CITY/STATE/ZIP 41 kle CeE s, . E GIAVEL WD l -r v CF. ill!I PHONE NO FAX NO. t X 03 Lf4 (o`ll? `'t,3 Z (PCI a PRIMARY CONTACT PERSON PHONE NO. Se 44■1 6A)(1-04 G03 Za& atiq- E-Mail 4A [�e,vt LsC,�,�.eo AA PROPERTY OWNER/DEED HOLDER(Attach list if more than one) DAi7D Y S Lc_ MAILINt� R CLTY/ST /ZIP l I \� (2 q PHONE JD5 r\vitl∎�0"TJ) i R, tFAX NO.SUlle IL ) I , 1 l2 ( 7zzv 5(527-- 33a- YD Li soy -q77- 3ob2_ OM PROPOSAL SUMMARY(Please be specific) Con15-TPilc--n .J O 318I5 4q. r;. brat L/Gei.rrg. GPFIr_.E Atae.tkr , fizxt,..t4 e A-rrgc4Ep scram R-vmpre,►rr RE.1iet�► kAg .it f... fig.-n4ER, L 5,12. -A-ribA1. 1 is\curpin\masters\land use applications\other land use applications.doc. City of Tivard I 13125 SW Hall Blvd..Tivard,OR 97223 I 503-718-2421 I www.tieard-or.aov I Pa2-e 1 oft APPLICANTS: *When the owner and the applicant are different people,the applicant must be the purchaser of record or a lessee in possession with written authorization from the owner or an agent of the owner. The owner(s)must sign this application in the space provided or submit a written authorization with this application BY SIGNING BELOW,THE APPLICANT(S)SHALL CERTIFY THAT: • The above request does not violate any deed restrictions that may be attached to or imposed upon the subject property, • If the application is granted,the applicant will exercise the rights granted in accordance with the terms and subject to all the conditions and limitations of the approval. • All of the above statements and the statements in the plot plan,attachments,and exhibits transmitted herewith,are true;and the applicants so acknowledge that any permit issued,based on this application,may be revoked if it is found that any such statements are false. • The applicant has read the entire contents of the application, induding the policies and criteria, and understands the requirements for approving or denying the application. ( 4/t Applicant's Signature Dat ANOW C ..r / / Owner's • Da e Owner's Signature Date Authorized Agent's Signature Date Print Name Title Phone Number SIGNATURES of each owner of the subject property are required City of Tigard I 13125 SW Hall Blvd.,Tigard,OR 97223 I 503-718-2421 I www.tigard-or.gov I Page 2 oft CITY OF TIGARD RECEIPT S ii 13125 SW Hall Blvd.,Tigard OR 97223 503.639.4171 TIGARD Receipt Number: 184899 - 12/15/2011 CASE NO. FEE DESCRIPTION REVENUE ACCOUNT NUMBER PAID SDR2011-00003 SDR Under$1,000,000 100-0000-43116 $4,084.00 SDR2011-00003 SDR Under$1,000,000-LRP 100-0000-43117 $603.00 Total: $4,687.00 PAYMENT METHOD CHECK# CC AUTH.CODE ACCT ID CASHIER ID RECEIPT DATE RECEIPT AMT Check 1004 KPEERMAN 12/15/2011 $4,687.00. Payor: CDBK PROPERTIES, LLC. ' Total Payments: $4,687.00 Balance Due: $0.00 Page 1 of 1 I: City of Tigard TIGARD Land Use Permit Application APPLICATIONS WILL NOT BE ACCEPTED IN PARTIAL SUBMITTALS. ALL ITEMS MUST BE SUBMITTED AT ONE TIME. ➢ This form is required to complete your submittal. The applicant must check the box next to the item verifying that the information is present. Staff will check off the items at intake. ➢ Three (3) copies of all materials are required for the initial review process. The balance of the copies will be requested once your submittal is deemed substantially complete. ➢ Each packet must be collated. ➢ Plans are required to be a minimum of 24"x 36"or 22"x 34". ➢ Plans must be FOLDED,rolled plans are not accepted. Applicant Staff Documents, Copies and Fees Required Completed Master"Land Use Permit"Application with property owner's signature or name of agent and letter of authorization Title transfer instrument or grant deed i/ Written summary of proposal Narrative demonstrating compliance with all applicable development standards and approval criteria (as specified in the Pre-Application Conference notes) Documentary evidence of Neighborhood Meeting: Neighborhood Meeting Affidavits of V Posting&Mailing Notice,Minutes,Sign-in Sheets Service Provider Letter 7cc i/- j /7-47.-e2/14 c( 3/3f/)— �✓ Impact Study per Section 18.390.040.B.2(e) / Copy of the Pre-Application Conference notes l./"--- Filing Fee (see fee schedule) ✓ Preliminary Sight Distance Certification li Preliminary Storm Calculations Arborist Report .----' Traffic Report (if Required) (/ Maps or Plans (Plans must be at least 24"x 36") ii Architectural Drawings (elevations& floor plans) S, ale� ✓ Existing Conditions Map X ,/ Landscape Plan X j Preliminary Grading/Erosion Control Plan Preliminary Partition/Lot Line Adjustment Plan Preliminary Storm Drainage Plan Preliminary Utilities Plan 14p` Public Improvements/Streets Plan 4cre Dui ✓ Site Development Plan 011%, ---- Subdivision Preliminary Plat Map *A9444 Pa kv4 jr Topography Map o,y LA.oseAre 01/44 Tree Preservation/Mitigation Plan etil Cql -( Vicinity Map ➢ Once your application has been deemed substantially complete you will be notified by the Planning Division in the form of a completeness letter indicating that you will need to provide the following: Two (2) sets of stamped,addressed#10 envelopes for all owners of property within 500 feet of the subject property (the 2 sets must remain separated for the purpose of 2 mailings). Mailing envelopes shall be standard legal-size (#10), addressed with 1"X 4"labels (please see envelope submittal requirements). Property owner mailing lists must be prepared by the City for a minimal fee (please see request for 500'property owner mailing list form). I:\CURPLN\Masters\Submittal Requirements Check List.doc (updated:21-january-10) Notice of a Type II Decision T I G A R D Site Development Review Case ID: SDR2011-00003 (Schwindt Medical/Dental Office) Description of the Decision Notice is hereby given that the City of Tigard Community Development Director's designee has APPROVED the above request, subject to certain conditions of approval. The findings and conclusions on which the decision is based are noted in the Final Decision. Tigard Community Development Contact Information Date of Notice: Wednesday, April 18, 2012 120 days = Friday,June 29, 2012 Staff Contact: Darrel "Hap" Watkins 503-718-2440 HAP @tigard-or.gov Appeal Information All persons entitled to notice or who are otherwise adversely affected or aggrieved by the decision may appeal the decision. Appeal forms are available on the city's website or by person at the Permits Center. If you would like to appeal this decision, we need to receive your completed appeal form by 4 p.m. on Tuesday, May 01, 2012. Please include the Case ID Number: SDR2011-00003. Please hand- deliver your completed appeal form (which will be time-stamped) and pay the associated appeal fees at the Permits Center, 13125 SW Hall Blvd., Tigard, Oregon 97223. If you have any questions regarding this decision please address them to the appropriate staff person noted on this form: Darrel "Hap" Watkins and note the Case ID Number: SDR2011-00003 This decision is final on Wednesday, April 18, 2012, unless an appeal is filed. The decision will go into effect on Wednesday, May 02, 2012, unless an appeal is filed. A copy of the Final Decision is available upon request from the staff contact person noted above. Information About the Decision Applicant: KASA Architects, Inc. Owner: CDBK Properties, LLC Kevin Saxton 11565 SW Durham Rd, Bldg. F, #10 4110 SE Cesar E. Chavez Blvd. Tigard, OR 97224 Portland, OR 97211 Description of the Proposal: The applicant is requesting Site Development Review approval to demolish an existing 567 square foot vacant building and construct a 3,815 square foot medical/dental office building with associated parking and site improvements on an approximately 15,165 square foot site at SW Summerfield Drive and Durham Road. Legal 11445 SW Summerfield Drive; Washington County Tax Map 2S110DC, Tax Description: Lots 00500 and 01300. City of Tigard,Community Development Division •13125 SW Hall Blvd.,Tigard,Oregon 97223 pg. 1 Zoning: C-G: .Jeneral Commercial District Appeal Procedure Details The decision of the Director (Type II Procedure) or Review Authority (Type II Administrative Appeal or Type III Procedure) is final for purposes of appeal on the date that it is mailed. Any party with standing as provided in Section 18.390.040.G.1. may appeal this decision in accordance with Section 18.390.040.G.2. of the Tigard Community Development Code which provides that a written appeal together with the required fee shall be filed with the Director within ten (10) business days of the date the notice of the decision was mailed. The appeal fee schedule and forms are available from the Planning Division of Tigard City Hall, 13125 SW Hall Boulevard, Tigard, Oregon 97223. Unless the applicant is the appellant, the hearing on an appeal from the Director's Decision shall be confined to the specific issues identified in the written comments submitted by the parties during the comment period. Additional evidence concerning issues properly raised in the Notice of Appeal may be submitted by any party during the appeal hearing, subject to any additional rules of procedure that may be adopted from time to time by the appellate body. The deadline for filing an appeal is 4 p.m. on Tuesday, May 01, 2012 Site Map • B a tp* //thtj2 B Brea Notified (500 Ft)Fr BOSS 8 BB B Scbwlrdt Mc t )enis3Hnong/ hEIS f Se DeMoprt,t9 RNw I SER2Df r.DOM B B 1 ' 8 8 i .. 8 B ♦ V4 / s �9 EBBB 4 y BB✓`1 0 f� Al f ..1-1 1 .FBI I°° - DURHA RD -_ 111 R3, wWen,.r.9n.n.NJ In 3 mop 71 1 f, �Y+..�wlMMr.wa.l.• ... O LauMa.• ewo,Pe.t se..rctl ulnna+rr.a:. aalaMaa.r,a 7.77 ao.fMRalaia4n; �..��- W V'*ta.laalaa}pa acar.vaaraua•a' i 1.4 a►eSAIM^A<nrO l.p.A{sen.as ya{Y_. �..--. ( �'i wwwv lwrar..aiwaiyv.nwosr. i 1� i� _/______I. LOWMTf t�E�E.ilVn6re tl-• ,. a •a..e M9.3 SO'.`YRa'rx City of Tigard,Community Development Division.13125 SW Hall Blvd.,Tigard,Oregon 97223 pg. 2 S. Notice of a Type II Proposal ■ a � Site Development Review T 1 L.A K D New Construction - Case ID: SDR2011-00003 Tigard Community Development Contact Information Date of Notice: Friday,March 02,2012 120 days = Monday,July 02, 2012 To: Interested Persons Staff Contact: Darrel "Hap"Watkins 503-718-2440 HAP @tigard-or.gov If you would like to comment on this proposal, we need to receive your written comments by 5 p.m. on Friday, March 16, 2012 . Please mail or deliver your comments to 13125 SW Hall Blvd., Tigard, Oregon 97223. Include the Case ID Number: SDR2011-00003. Please address your comments to the appropriate staff person: Darrel "Hap" Watkins. Information About the Proposal Description of the Proposal: Applicant requests site development approval to construct a 3,815 sq. ft.medical/dental office building with associated parking and landscaping in a C-G zone. Applicant: KASA Architects,Inc. Kevin Saxton 4119 SE Cesar E. Chavez Blvd. Portland,OR 97211 Owner 1: CDBK Properties,LLC 11565 SW Durham Rd.,Bldg. F,Suite 100 Tigard,OR 97224 Proposal Address: 11445 SW Summerfield Drive Legal Washington County Tax Map 2S110DC,Tax Parcels 00500 and 01300. Description: Zoning: C-G: General Commercial District Approval Criteria: Tigard Development Code TDC18.390.090 What You Should Know About This Type II Proposal The proposed development requires a land use review. The goal of this notice is to invite interested parties to participate early in the decision-making process by submitting comments in writing during the open comment period. City of Tigard,Community Development Division•13125 SW Hall Blvd.,Tigard,Oregon 97223 Type II decisions are made by the Community Development Director after consideration of relevant evidence and public comments received during the open comment period.The decision will be mailed to the applicant and to owners of property located within 500 feet of the proposal site and anyone who submitted written comments or is otherwise entitled to a decision notice.The decision maker may: • Approve the proposal. • Approve the proposal with conditions. • Deny the proposal. All evidence considered in the decision will be contained in the public record and available for public review. If you would like to review this material, please schedule an appointment with Lora Garland, Records Management Specialist, 503-718-2483. If you wish to receive copies of the materials,city records will prepare them for you at a reasonable cost. Appeal Information Failure of any party to address the relevant approval criteria with sufficient specificity may preclude subsequent appeals to the Land Use Board of Appeals or Circuit Court on that issue. Comments directed at the relevant approval criteria (Tigard Municipal Code) are what constitute relevant evidence. Details regarding the appeal process and requirements are contained within Tigard Municipal Code Chapter 18.390. There is a fee charged for appeals. Attachments Included in this Notice Zoning and site map. Notice to Mortgagee, Lienholder,Vendor,or Seller The Tigard Development Code requires that if you receive this notice it shall be promptly forwarded to the purchaser. City of Tigard,Community Development Division•13125 SW Hall Blvd.,Tigard,Oregon 97223 o I 117,4, __ _ cn eaB B B B B B n ' ' a ee e F Area Notified (500 Ft) ' . BBBB B B S 'Z7 o ee e �n ' `` e B B • .•t� 00 CDBK Properties.LLC y Beea r O�JN King C'; ''..' Schwindt Dental Office B . . o P ■ ` \ B B OR ' 'C-4 co in Y , pr 4... , ni I .'. ■ awe oo, C7 ,• • BEIGE oo� ® Subject Sde �` \,•.•a . \ BB BB`� DURHAM.711:: 1 ' HAM RO W j' \ \`\\`\,t , RopartY owner iMamdion ie veld I—, for 3 months from the date printed on r N'N ` `' this map. Ni / ,A6., N.1 ■• 6,71 bd \\` Map Printed 0.'.Mw.11 (fQQ� / < eaarntlaJn anew rrlspAM mineral lOeaOOn Z trey and Meld M sweetie.the D7srstepnent MI J/ atrvtaeotrrtrw co CR / 4 O \ , V LN 1 , pCOMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT N cNe rya W _ w.ro.wuo.le gr.?. n N 0 0 B R. lM r - VICINITY MAP n R-4.5 R-4;) R-12 ' 4 R-12 (PD) R-3.5 10,000 sq ft lot ►a i R-4.5 7,500 sq ft lot tH 0 R-7 5,000 sq ft lot co R-3.5 R-12 3,050 sq ft lot p i o R-25 1,480 sq ft lot (") ry s R-40 40 units per acre 0 D I - C-G General Commercial FD • R-3-5 (PD) PD Planned Development k Schwindt Dental Office dI* �,. R-7 co ; , I o y: f. R-25 (PD) G Subject Site 5' m W R-7 (PD) IJ tn cn 1 p-2 5 ! n,onnapon on this map.tor gannu location Q. f� 1 on0ana stow ee 0...a„ome vebpm r1 Sere¢ D� 'ii,. ar,ruw fl,n=oo n H r _ ','ar,v,rtes et dl W MIA on 02-Met it R. R-4.5 (PD) t °$ Feet '000 TICAR°Mgos ,�, R-2 (PD) ....•...0. N N W [110 Land Use Application COMPLETENESS REVIEW REQUEST TIGARD TO: Gus Duenas RETURN TO: Hap Watkins DATE SENT: 12-19-2011 DATE DUE: 12-28-2011 PROJECT NAME: CASE NUMBER: SDR2011-00003 PROJECT ADDRESS: 11445 SW Summerfield Dr. PROJECT DESCRIPTION: Schwindt Dental Building Complete? ❑ Yes 1VNo Comments below or,'See Attache is\curpin\masters\completeness review request.docx PUBLIC FACILITY PLAN Project: JR2011-00003 Schwindt . COMPLETENESS CHECKLIST Date: December 27, 2011 GRADING ❑ Existing and proposed contours shown. ❑ Are there grading impacts on adjacent parcels? ❑ Adjacent parcel grades shown. ® Geotech study submitted? No geotech study submitted. The study needs to show the percolation tests conducted and results. Soils in Tigard generally are not suitable for infiltration Actual percolation tests can show that the specific site is suitable for the infiltration measures shown.. STREET ISSUES ❑ Right-of-way clearly shown. ❑ Centerline of street(s) clearly shown. ❑ Street name(s) shown. ❑ Existing/proposed curb or edge of pavement shown. ❑ Street profiles shown. ❑ Future Street Plan: Must show street profiles, topo on adjacent parcel(s), etc. ❑ Traffic Impact and/or Access Report ❑ Street grades compliant? ® Street/ROW widths dimensioned and appropriate? No dimensions were shown on the drawings submitted. ❑ Private Streets? Less than 6 lots and width appropriate? ® Other: Narrative needs to address applicable Submit narrative briefly addressing sections of 18.801. applicable sections of 18.810 and findings for each of the section. The narrative refers to utility and site plans, which is not adequate. The narrative needs to stand on its own supplemented by more detailed information in appendices. Explain how each section of the code is to be met and whether or not the proposed measures meet each section. The submittal included a variety of documents which should be organized and tied to the application by some type of numbering for reference. Do not refer to plans because plans do change. SANITARY SEWER ISSUES ® Existing/proposed lines shown. No narrative submitted addressing 18.810 ® Stubs to adjacent parcels required/shown? Slope of proposed lateral for sanitary sewer service is too flat. REVISED. 12/28/11 WATER ISSUES ❑ Existing/proposed lines w/ sizes noted? No narrative submitted addressing specific sections of 18.810. Referring to plans is not acceptable. Explain in words what will be done to address each applicable section of the code and refere to more detailed information, if included with the submittal as an Appendix. ❑ Existing/proposed fire hydrants shown? ❑ Proposed meter location and size shown? ❑ Proposed fire protection system shown? STORM DRAINAGE AND WATER QUALITY ISSUES ® Existing/proposed lines shown? Submit narrative addressing specific sections of 18.810. Organize the appendices and provide supporting documents in an organized fashion. ❑ Preliminary sizing calcs for water quality/detention provided? ❑ Water quality/detention facility shown on plans? ❑ Area for facility match requirements from calcs? ❑ Facility shown outside any wetland buffer? ❑ Storm stubs to adjacent parcels required/shown? The submittal is hereby deemed ❑ COMPLETE ® INCOMPLETE By: Q P• �_ Date: December 27, 2011 REVISED: 12/28/11 TIGAR Land Use Application COMPLETENESS REVIEW REQUEST TO: Todd Prager RETURN TO: Hap Watkins DATE SENT: 12-19-2011 DATE DUE: 12-28-2011 PROJECT NAME: CASE NUMBER: SDR2011-00003 PROJECT ADDRESS: 11445 SW Summerfield Dr. PROJECT DESCRIPTION: Schwindt Dental Building Complete? ❑ Yes [/ No Comments below or V See Attached is\curpin\masters\completeness review request.docx Schwindt MedicaVDental Office Completeness Item Met Not Met N/A Comments 18.745.040: X It appears there is space for two Street Trees additional street trees (one to the north and one to the south of the proposed trees) along the Summerfield Drive frontage. 18.745.050: X Buffering and Screening 18.790.030: X The tree plan requirements appear to be Tree Plan met. However, if required landscape Requirement trees (parking lot trees, street trees, etc.) are utilized for mitigation credit, only those inches in excess of the minimum requirement(2"caliper) are eligible for credit. Based on the tree planting shown on sheet L1.0,the applicant would be eligible for 28 inches of credit. The fee in lieu would be for 66 inches not mitigated. 18.790.050: X No trees are proposed for removal in Permit Applicability sensitive lands. Todd Prager Associate Planner/Arborist December 20, 2011 e TIGARD City of Tigard January 3, 2012 KASA Architects, Inc. Kevin Saxton 4119 NE 39th Avenue Portland, OR 97211 RE: Completeness Review SDR2011-00003 Dear Mr. Saxton, The city has received your application for Site Development Review (SDR2011-00003) to construct a new 3,815 sq. ft. medical/dental office at 11445 SW Summerfield Drive. Staff has completed a preliminary review of the submittal materials and has determined that the following additional information is necessary before the application can be deemed complete: 7 1. Provide the metes and bounds property description for the site to accompany the ownership documents. V 2. Provide a Waste Hauler approval letter for curbside pick-up of waste. V 3. Provide location of gas meter and any other outdoor mechanical equipment and their screening per TDC18.745.050.E.2. Show locations on appropriate plan sheets. 4. Show exterior lighting locations for entrances and parking lot on site plan sheet. V 5. Show location of nearest fire hydrant on plans and provide water flow test. V 6. Provide height and opacity of plantings at east,north and west sides of parking lot. Refer to TDC18.745.050.E and TDC18.745.050.A.5. Please show plantings on plans. Plantings in the clear vision areas are limited to three feet in height. V 7. Revise plans page T1.0 to reflect: Healthy tree inches on site = 80 inches; On-site mitigated inches = 38;Required off-site mitigation inches (or fee-in-lieu) = 42. Credit is given only for the diameter increase above 2 inch code requirements (26 inches). I read your arborist report to indicate that Tree 6 (14 inches) is unhealthy and/or dying and it can be removed without mitigation. Please change the highlighting on the plans to indicate that. The Japanese Snowbell on the west side can be counted fully for mitigation (4 inches). There is room for two more street trees on Summerfield Drive (a tree can be in the clear vision area (8 inches). V 8. Provide two sets of pre-addressed (no return address), stamped (not metered) #10 size envelopes. 13125 SW Hall Blvd. • Tigard, Oregon 97223 • 503.639.4171 TTY Relay: 503.684.2772 • www.tigard-or.gov •• Development Engineering requires the following items: 1. Submit geotechnical study including percolation tests. 2. Show dimensions of the street/ROW on the plans. 3. Provide adequate slope for proposed sewer lateral on plans. 4. Submit narrative briefly addressing applicable sections of 18.810 and findings for each of the criteria. The narrative refers to utility and site plans, which is not adequate. The narrative needs to stand on its own supplemented by more detailed information in appendices. Explain how each section of the code is to be met and whether or not the proposed measures meet each criterion. I have enclosed a copy of the completeness checklist from the development engineer. Upon receipt of these materials a letter will be sent confirming completeness of your application with the number and size of plan sets to send out for review. It should be noted that staff has not reviewed the application submittal for compliance with the relevant code criteria, and that additional items may arise during the review process which may require further clarification. If you have any questions regarding this letter or your application, please don't hesitate to contact me at 503-718-2440 or email me at hap @tigard-or.gov. Sincerely, Darrel"Hap"Watkins Livability Compliance Specialist End: Dev Eng Checklist 2 or.hitec www.kas°pdccom RECEIVED February 03, 2012 FEB 0 3 2012 CITY OF TIGARD Hap Watkins PLANNING/ENGINEERING City of Tigard 13125 SW Hall Blvd. Tigard, Oregon 97223 RE: Schwindt Medical/Dental Office Response to Completeness Review SDR2011-00003 Dear Hap: The following is a response to your Completeness Review letter dated January 3, 2012 for SDR2011- 00003. Each item below is numbered to correspond to the items in your letter. 1. Please see the attached metes and bounds property description. 2. Please see the attached email from Pride Disposal stating that they can provide roll-cart service. Kelsey at Pride said that they don't issue approval letters for roll-cart service. Please let me know if this email will be sufficient. 3. Please see the attached Site Plan sheet Al and the Storm Drainage and Utilities Plan sheet C2.0 for the location of the gas meter. Please see the attached Elevations sheet A2 for the mechanical screens located on the roof. 4. Please see the attached Site Plan sheet Al for the locations of the parking lot lighting and exterior building lighting. The intent is to illuminate not only the parking lot, but also the exterior of the building. Ground mounted lights located on the south and east sides of the building will wash the building in light along Durham and Summerfield. Accent lights at the building entrance will illuminate the ground and parking spaces in front of the building that are not fully illuminated by the parking lot lights. For security purposes a building mounted light will be located on the west side of the building. 5. Please see the attached Storm Drainage and Utilities Plan sheet C2.0 for the location of the two nearest fire hydrants; one to the east of the site across Summerfield Drive and one to the northeast of the site across the shared access drive. There are no water flow tests for the existing hydrants on file with the City. However the pressure at these hydrants has been noted on the plan. 6. Please see the Plant Schedule on the attached Planting Plan sheet L1.0 for height and opacity of the plantings. Clean vision areas with corresponding plant heights are also shown. The following is our interpretation and application of screening code: TDC 18.745.050.E The screening of the parking lot on the west, north and east sides is achieved by planting a combination of groundcover, shrubs and trees. An evergreen shrub hedge of Abelia x gradiflora and Ilex glabra 'Compacta' will act as the main screening component and will achieve a minimum of 4 feet in height. Response to Completeness Review SDR2011-00003 Page 1 of 3 February 03, 2012 4119 NE Cesar E. Chavez Blvd., Portland, Oregon 97211 p 503.284.6917 f 503.284.6917 www.kasapdx.com 6,■ � architec ts,Inc. w w+ apthscom Each landscape planter is at least 3 feet in width with wheel guards protecting them from vehicular damage. A small existing retaining wall on the west side of the lot enhances screening of the parking area as well. See Plant Schedule for dimensions of plant material. TDC 18.745.050.B.5 The site is zoned commercial and abuts commercial lots to the north and west, and an arterial street to the south. The 18.745.1 buffer matrix indicates that there are no screening requirements for commercial abutting commercial and arterial street uses. The east property line is abutting a R7 residential zone and separated by a right of way (SW Summerfield drive) and therefore requires a "C" level buffer. The screening requirement does not apply as zones are separated by a right of way(see TDC 18.745.050.A.2). Option 1 of Table 18.745.2 prescribes a 10 foot wide buffer with trees (15' min. at 30' o.c.) and shrubs. This requirement is met with the combination of trees, shrubs and sidewalk (see TDC18.745.050.B.2 for sidewalk inclusion). 7. Please see the attached Tree Plan sheet T1.0 for the revised Mitigation Summary. The Planting Plan on sheet L1.0 includes additional trees as follows: • Added 2 snowbells on SW Summerfield as directed. • Added an additional Tupelo to meet 30' o.c. buffer requirement. This brings mitigation total to 40 inches. 8. Please find attached two sets of pre-addressed stamped envelopes. Responses to Development Engineering 1. Please see the attached Report of Geotechnical Engineering Services dated October 31, 2011. 2. Please see the attached Grading and Erosion Control Plan sheet C1.0 for the street and right-of-way dimensions. 3. Please see the attached Storm Drainage and Utilities Plan sheet C2.0 for the slope of the proposed sewer lateral. 4. The following is an expanded written narrative that describes how the proposed development meets the applicable sections of 18.810: 18.810.050.A The property has access to the city sewer line located on the north side of the property in a 15-foot wide easement that was recorded with Washington County Deed Records per document 79046729 a copy of which is included in our application. 18.810.060.A There will be no change to the lot size, shape and frontage other than the dedication at the intersection of Summerfield Drive and Durham Road as requested by the City of Tigard Engineering Department. 18.810.070 There will be no change to the existing public sidewalks as part of the proposed development. A new walk will be installed to the new building from the public sidewalk on Summerfield Drive. 18.810.090 A new 6 inch sanitary sewer line will be connected to the existing 8 inch sanitary sewer line on the north side of the property. The new sanitary sewer line will head north from Response to Completeness Review SDR2011-00003 Page 2 of 3 February 03, 2012 4119 NE Cesar E. Chavez Blvd., Portland, Oregon 97211 p 503.284.6917 f 503.284.6917 www.kasapdx.com t � A -■ a arch tect,inc. wNv1 kzcpd.corn the building, crossing the new parking lot and connect to the existing sewer line in the shared access drive on the north side of the site. 18.810.100 The storm water drainage system for the site will consist of pervious pavers in the parking lot and an infiltration planter on the east side of the site. The pervious pavers will accommodate infiltration of storm water within the parking area. Storm water run off from the building will be collected in roof drains and piped to the infiltration planter. No surface water will be carried across any intersection or allowed to flood any street. 18.810.120 The underground utilities will consist of both existing and new. The site is currently supplied with water, gas, electrical power, and telecommunications from the south side of the site. The existing water meter is located on the western portion of the southern property line adjacent to Durham Road. The meter will remain in its current location and be reused. A new water line will connect the new building to the existing meter. An existing gas service line running north-south connects to the gas main in Durham Road and crosses the southern property line at approximately the mid point. A new gas meter will be located on the west side of the building and will be connected to the service line with a new line running along the south and west sides of the building. The existing electrical power service enters the site from Durham Road near the southwest corner. The power service will be reused for the new building. An existing telephone manhole is located near the intersection of Durham Road and Summerfield Drive. A new telecommunications service line will connect the new building to this manhole. Please find included with this letter 3 copies of the following: 1. Metes and bounds description for the property(Schedule C) 2. Email from Pride Disposal dated August 05, 2011 3. Pre-addressed, stamped envelopes (2 sets) 4. C1.0 Grading and Erosion Control Plan dated September 01, 2011 5. C2.0 Storm Drainage and Utilities Plan dated September 01, 2011 6. T1.0 Tree Plan dated January 10, 2012 7. L1.0 Planting Plan dated January 10, 2012 8. L2.0 Landscape Details dated January 10, 2012 9. L2.1 Landscape Details dated January 10, 2012 10. Al Site Plan & Demolition Site Plan dated February 03, 2012 11. A2 Elevations and Floor Plan dated February 03, 2012 Please let me know if you have any questions or need any further information. Thank you. Sincerely, KASA Architects, Inc. 4A4A. Kevin Saxton Principal Response to Completeness Review SDR2011-00003 Page 3 of 3 February 03, 2012 4119 NE Cesar E. Chavez Blvd., Portland, Oregon 97211 p 503.284.6917 f 503.284.6917 www.kasapdx.com PUBLIC FACILITY PLAN Project: DR2011-00003 Schwindt. COMPLETENESS CHECKLIST Date: February 7, 2012 GRADING ❑ Existing and proposed contours shown. ❑ Are there grading impacts on adjacent parcels? ❑ Adjacent parcel grades shown. ❑ Geotech study submitted? STREET ISSUES ❑ Right-of-way clearly shown. ❑ Centerline of street(s) clearly shown. ❑ Street name(s) shown. ❑ Existing/proposed curb or edge of pavement shown. ❑ Street profiles shown. ❑ Future Street Plan: Must show street profiles, topo on adjacent parcel(s), etc. ❑ Traffic Impact and/or Access Report ❑ Street grades compliant? ❑ Street/ROW widths dimensioned and appropriate? ❑ Private Streets? Less than 6 lots and width appropriate? ® Other: I %� SANITARY SEWER ISSUES > (, r'6 �III�W�,J ❑ Existing/proposed lines shown. The sanitary sewer line looks like it crosses someone else's property to connect to the existing line north of the property. Show that this property has a right to cross t. There is a segment of land south of the easement and north of the property line that does not belong to the property owner. Provide proof that there is an existing right to cross that property, or obtain that right to do so as part of this process. ❑ Stubs to adjacent parcels required/shown? WATER ISSUES ❑ Existing/proposed lines w/ sizes noted? ❑ Existing/proposed fire hydrants shown? ❑ Proposed meter location and size shown? ❑ Proposed fire protection system shown? STORM DRAINAGE AND WATER QUALITY ISSUES ❑ Existing/proposed lines shown? ❑ Preliminary sizing calcs for water quality/detention provided? ❑ Water quality/detention facility shown on plans? ❑ Area for facility match requirements from calcs? REVISED: 02/07/12 L- Facility shown outside and eland buffer? ❑ Storm stubs to adjacent parcels required/shown? The submittal is hereby deemed ❑ COMPLETE E INCOMPLETE By: P• Date: February 7, 2012 REVISED: 02/07/12 2" BRASS DISK IN CONCRETE SIDEWALK I V / V • ON 190.990, NGVD 29 DATUM. (FORMATION AND EXISTING DRA 4 S. TAX L . _ 500, A PORTION Of -VERIFIED PRIOR TOT CONSTRUCTION. SOUTHEAST QUARTER OF SE FOUND ON THE GROUND ON JUNE 7, WILLAMETTE MERIDIAN, Cll • WASHINGTON COUNTY DEED RECORDS. DATE: VIL 19, 2011, THERE IS NO EASEMENT Y AND EASTERLY PORTION OF THE PER 29 i rcra_. CVW= -ENT o46-1 DER N MBER 791979 bRp5 — 9 Co ,,••--..e Z± ±C) I10 ENT NO E,INV °EEC TAX LOT 2300 ¢� N►N���N co z 0 cNi 25' WIDE• EASEMENT RECIPROCAL PER DOCUMENT NUMBER 5 U 85-019789, WASHINGTON COUNTY a w DEED RECORDS _ _ _ cc La-Th�7- — °• �� CC -60- - - - _� —\ 80.52 s �� � I�co S 89'5207" W 111. 19 8° - - _ - - _ _ — - ss -fir T=179.97 E V _ — _ - - - - L--- N 8" SS 1- - '- — — P — — ° \ 2' — — — N 7.!..-7- P PROPERTY LINE ,� N '� s�S �2 07 W 46.82 46 Z 8 �s S 03 CO a, 01 CO nl \ 10 t.•j CC � ASPHALT T C ,�.� SURFACE d �SW cc TAX LOT 500 CC / \ NN 15, 148 SF OR �,6 ✓ ' cp r,�5 186.79 rc X0.348 ACRES 18. - TC _ �.. ! 186.27 186.09 \ 184.9 0. '1`186.I1— + 186.4\ /I 186.86 ASPHALT 1 1 SURFACE N 03 186.4 'd CC CC + \ / C lea.s CSW CSW CONCRETE I �^'j O _ ` / + 186.9 \ / \ STAIRS O 1 ,`„+ 186.9 / \,&j $,��T�j ) I ^ � �. 7.3I�. 1 r1 a� T6 t T8 .7 a �., � ;1►l� T1�RPC � � 7 T�T�1 /t • 1 . 0" E 1 11445 SW r --,q I V •' NO (1 .4 5 G18��'16 187.11 cv ;;- PARKING J 5 ..1,57 w+ SUMMERFIELD I�' SIGN DRIVE 4 Q> CONCRETE POND 87.91 it v FILLED WITH ROCKS GM 1 STORY BUILDING 4• 87 1 TEL �L 19 95 , r. 188 E i WITH DECK ' O (SEE NO 4 %,;, O SIDEWALA p4 Q I T2 \ + 187.4 87� .e8 7 I I N ENCROAC CO �78q + 186.9 `— `, T5 186.381 (SEE Na ,D� \/ \ Fes:: III 185.99 .n' 186.9 T3 v. Q �,i ��n��'' + 187.7 + 187.8 2.50 III 186.35 TC OV • _ � MONUMENT ��\SIGN I PROP( �L 90 4, TAX LOT \300 IN SIDEW� 44.-3'17'4:i. ,/ =3'17'4 ,�" p.. —189— \28 SF \,,,-t-,,,„ ' ° i 17 1i2 4 .~19'� .. r. i C1 Hap Watkins From: Hap Watkins Sent: Wednesday, February 08, 2012 4:49 PM To: Gus Duenas Subject: RE: Schwindt Dentist Office; SDR2011-00003 I talked to Kevin yesterday and he is going to revise plan sheet C.2 to reflect the sanitary line going to the northwest corner of his property. I expect a copy tomorrow or Friday. apatite! "(flap"0Watkula /1vabillt# Compliance jSpoeclallet 503-718-2440 From: Gus Duenas Sent: Wednesday, February 08, 2012 9:04 AM To: Kevin Saxton; Hap Watkins Cc: Mike White Subject: RE: Schwindt Dentist Office; SDR2011-00003 Kevin, The easement you transmitted gives access rights but does not say anything about utilities. Easements for sanitary sewer and storm drain lines are typically specifically written for those purposes. To legally connect to the existing main, you would have to obtain rights to connect to underground utilities in the easement, including rights to cross over the property outside the dental office property. It may be possible to connect at the northwest corner of the property without obtaining any further easement rights. Otherwise, I do believe we need to have a utility easement document covering the proposed sewer line outside the project boundary. Gus Agustin P. Duenas, P.E. . City of Tigard Development Engineer (503) 718-2470 Work TIIGARD (503) 969-4188 Mobile gus @tigard-or.gov 13125 SW Hall Blvd Tigard, OR 97223 www.tigard-or.gov From: Kevin Saxton jmailto:ksaxton @kasapdx.comj Sent: Tuesday, February 07, 2012 4:35 PM To: Hap Watkins 1 Cc: Gus Duenas Subject: RE: Schwindt Dentist Office; SDR2011-00003 Attached is the access easement. Attachment: Reciprocal Easement Agreement for Access Purposes.pdf Sincerely, Kevin Saxton LEED®AP KASA architects,Inc. 4119 NE Cesar E Chavez Blvd. Portland,Oregon 97211 503.284.6917 From: Kevin Saxton fmailto:ksaxton(akasaDdx.coml Sent: Tuesday, February 07, 2012 3:55 PM To: 'Hap Watkins' Cc: 'Gus @tigard-or.gov' Subject: Schwindt Dentist Office; SDR2011-00003 Hi Hap, Attached is the easement for the sewer line. Attachment: Sewer Easement.pdf Sincerely, Kevin Saxton LEED®AP KASA architects,Inc. 4119 NE Cesar E Chavez Blvd. Portland,Oregon 97211 503.284.6917 DISCLAIMER: E-mails sent or received by City of Tigard employees are subject to public record laws. If requested, e-mail may be disclosed to another party unless exempt from disclosure under Oregon Public Records Law. E-mails are retained by the City of Tigard in compliance with the Oregon Administrative Rules"City General Records Retention Schedule." 2 architects,1r•c. www.kasapdY.corn RECEIVE D FEB 212012 TRANSMITTAL CITY OF TIGARD Date: February 21, 2012 PLANNING/ENGINEERING Project: Schwindt Dentist Office Proj. No.: 1105 From: Kevin Saxton ksaxton @kasapdx.com To: Hap Watkins Sent Via: Delivery City of Tigard 13125 SW Hall Blvd. Tigard, Oregon 97223 Tel: 503.718.2440 Copies To: File/ Project Team These are Transmitted for: Your Use Message: Hap, Attached are the revised utility plan, tree plan, and planting plan. We revised the sanitary sewer lateral so that it connects to the existing lateral on site. The planting plans have been revised so that the Frisia Honeylocust and the Chinese Windmill Palm that are within the vision clearance triangle will be limbed to 8 feet. The Japanese Snowbells that were in the planter strip on Summerfield Drive have been moved to the parking lot perimeter. According to Todd Prager, the 3-foot wide planter is not large enough for street trees. The new landscape plan accounts for 41 inches of onsite mitigation as follows: Black Tupelo at 16"of credit(6 at 2"and 1 at 4") Frisia Honeylocust at 8" of credit (4 at 2") Northern Catalpa at 2" of credit Japanese Snowbells at 15" of credit (1 at 4", 1 at 3"and 4 at 2"). Total = 41 inches onsite mitigation /39 inches offsite mitigation needed Please let me know if you have any questions or additional comments. Thank you. Sincerely, Kevin Attachments: Description Date Quantity 1. C2.0 Storm Drainage & Utilities February 14, 2012 3 2. T1.0 Tree Plan February 10, 2012 3 3. L1.0 Planting Plan February 10, 2012 3 Page 1 of 1 4119 NE Cesar E. Chavez Blvd., Portland. Oregon 97211 p 503.284.6917 f 503.284.6917 www.kasapdx.com . ;i *TA. :211—)'D City of Tigard February 29,2012 KASA Architects, Inc. Kevin Saxton 4119 SE Cesar E. Chavez Blvd. Portland, OR 97211 RE: Completeness Letter SDR2011-00003 Dear Kevin, The city received your revised plans February 21,2012,and the CD of the complete application on February 28,2012.They have been accepted and the application is nearly complete. I apologize for not informing you of the plan sets required to mail out for comments when I asked for the CD of the application. The notice of proposal will be mailed upon receipt of full application packets. Please provide 5 packets with full size plan sets and 9 packets with 11 X 17 reduced plan sets. I will mail them and begin the two week comment period upon receipt. Thank you for your understanding and your quick responses to all the requests from this office. Call or email me if you have questions or I can be of any assistance. Sincerely, 4,,,,,Itkaii...,;„ Darrel"Hap"Watkins Livability Compliance Specialist 1 13125 SW Hall Blvd. • Tigard, Oregon 97223 • 503.639.4171 TTY Relay: 503.684.2772 • www.tigard-or.gov . w TIGARD City of Tigard March 1, 2012 KASA Architects, Inc. Kevin Saxton 4119 SE Cesar E. Chavez Blvd. Portland, OR 972111 RE: Completeness Letter SDR2011-00003 Dear Kevin, I received the application packets (14) and will mail them out tomorrow. Your application is now complete. You may now submit plans for site work or building permits to be reviewed by the building division. The building division cannot issue permits until the land use case is final. You have perhaps 5 or 6 weeks to have your permits reviewed. Thank you for your timely and professional responses to all my requests during the completeness period. Re rds, /1,t/ILL Vgid"..0, 1 Darrel "Hap"Watkins Livability Compliance Specialist 13125 SW Hall Blvd. • Tigard, Oregon 97223 • 503.639.4171 TTY Relay: 503.684.2772 • www.tigard-or.gov li it ------------------ ---------------- _ In n 15' WIDE SEWER EASEMENT PER �' 25' WIDE RECIPROCAL ACCESS 1 DOCUMENT FEE NUMBER 79046729 EASEMENT PER DOCUMENT NUMBER ``.. RECORDED NOVEMBER 13, 1979, BS-019789, WASHINGTON COUNTY 11 ``� . WASHINGTON COUNTY DEED DEED RECORDS 1 / RECORDS 1 N, • ,.... 1 1 .;, J,, , I VISION 1 CLEARANCE .1 �.., TRIANGLE C C C C C C C O 11 , ' '' / 1 POLE MOUNTED 1 / SITE LIGHT, TYP. Y I r / � r�- J J � 1 � J it I COVERED BIKE �� RACK FOR E SIDEWALK J ry `-� SPACES. SEE EASEMENT J 8/A2 //\ / \1 �/ Q r J / ? 1 i J r '1 �/ ) 11d J I 1 J d r-o-d I 1 CC d l :�:�� d d a 1 0• d / ACCESSIBLE W J PARKING SPACE, LL BUILDING IC li MOUNTED LIGHT SEE S A2 i w 1 BUILDING 1 GAS METER MOUNTED LIGHT i 1 W J 4 1 J / � PRELIMINARY VISION CLEARANCE // NOT FOR • TRIANGLE .!/ ° I CONSTRUCTION J J Al A KASA �/i/ architects, inc. L--J I_ _J t_ J b / 4119 NE Cesar E.Chavez Ave. •.1 / ' .Y J/ Portland.Oregon 97211 ----_ c---�� 501284.6917 . www.kosopdx.com GROUND MOUNTED BUILDING LIGHT, ,� TYR _� __ - c Scwhindt �- --- - - - ` BY MONUMENT SIGN, i O��Medical/Dental --- -� -- -�- ---Approved I I 11445 SW Summerfield Or. 4 Conditionally Approved hard Oregon I(ASA Proj# 1105 SW DURHAM RD For onl thle work as described in• PERMIT NO. 5n 2�// ODOR z SDR Comments.February 03212 See Letter to: Follow I I ° z A 8 - -1e z' Site Plan a Job Addr c Demolition Plan co ;� Site Plan 6 S By: Oate: `f �g �� Al 1• = 10.-0• �� E d capY6gII KASA Architects,Irk 2012 RECORDATION REQUESTED BY: First-Citizens Bank ii Trust Company Portland Main 309 SW 6th Ave,Ste 100 Portland,OR 97204 WHEN RECORDED MAIL TO: First Citizens Bank Loan Servicing Department-DAC20 PO Box 26592 Raleigh,NC 27611.6592 SEND TAX NOTICES TO: CDBK PROPERTIES,LLC 8234 SW 10TH AVENUE PORTLAND,OR 97219 SPACE ABOVE THIS LINE IS FOR RECORDER'S USE ONLY V H OOlH 'OO 0 IH 1001 000000000000000000108511012011000000000000001 DEED OF TRUST THIS DEED OF TRUST is dated November 2, 2011, among CDBK PROPERTIES, LLC, whose address is 8234 SW 10TH AVENUE, PORTLAND, OR 97219 ("Grantor"); First-Citizens Bank & Trust Company, whose address is Portland Main, 309 SW 6th Ave, Ste 100, Portland, OR 97204 (referred to below sometimes as "Lender" and sometimes as "Beneficiary"); and Valerie A. Tomasi, Esq., whose address is 121 SW Morrison St, Suite 600, Portland, OR 97204 (referred to below as"Trustee"). CONVEYANCE AND GRANT. For valuable consideration,represented in the Note dated November 2,2011,in the original principal amount of 5190,725.00, from Grantor to Lender, Grantor conveys to Trustee for the benefit of Lender as Beneficiary all of Grantor's right, title, and interest in and to the following described real property,together with all existing or subsequently erected or affixed buildings,improvements and fixtures; all easements, rights of way, and appurtenances; all water, water rights and ditch rights(including stock in utilities with ditch or irrigation rights): and all other rights, royalties, and profits relating to the real roperty, including without limitation all minerals, oil, gas, geothermal and similar matters.(the"Real Property") located in WASHINGTON County, State of Oregon: See the exhibit or other description document which is attached to this Deed of Trust and made a part of this Deed of Trust as if fully set forth herein. The Real Property or its address is commonly known as 11445 SW SUMMERFIELD DR,TIGARD,OR 97224. Grantor presently assigns to Lender(also known as Beneficiary in this Deed of Trust)all of Grantor's right,title,and interest in and to all present and future leases of the Property and all Rents from the Property. In addition, Grantor grants to Lender a Uniform Commercial Code security interest in the Personal Property and Rents. THIS DEED OF TRUST,INCLUDING THE ASSIGNMENT OF RENTS AND THE SECURITY INTEREST IN THE RENTS AND PERSONAL PROPERTY, IS GIVEN TO SECURE (A) PAYMENT OF THE INDEBTEDNESS AND (B) PERFORMANCE OF ANY AND ALL OBLIGATIONS UNDER THE NOTE, THE RELATED DOCUMENTS,AND THIS DEED OF TRUST. THIS DEED OF TRUST IS GIVEN AND ACCEPTED ON THE FOLLOWING TERMS: PAYMENT AND PERFORMANCE. Except as otherwise provided in this Deed of Trust,Grantor shall pay to Lender all amounts secured by this Deed of Trust as they become due,and shall strictly and in a timely manner perform all of Grantor's obligations under the Note,this Deed of Trust,and the Related Documents. POSSESSION AND MAINTENANCE OF THE PROPERTY. Grantor agrees that Grantor's possession and use of the Property shall be governed by the following provisions: Possession and Use. Until the occurrence of an Event of Default,Grantor may (1) remain in possession and control of the Property; (2) use,operate or manage the Property;and (3) collect the Rents from the Property. The following provisions relate to the use of the Property or to other limitations on the Property. BEFORE SIGNING OR ACCEPTING THIS INSTRUMENT,THE PERSON TRANSFERRING FEE TITLE SHOULD INQUIRE ABOUT THE PERSON'S RIGHTS, IF ANY, UNDER ORS 195.300, 195.301 AND 195.305 TO 195.336 AND SECTIONS 5 TO 11,CHAPTER 424,OREGON LAWS 2007,AND SECTIONS 2 TO 9 AND 17,CHAPTER 855,OREGON LAWS 2009.THIS INSTRUMENT DOES NOT ALLOW USE OF THE PROPERTY DESCRIBED IN THIS INSTRUMENT IN VIOLATION OF APPLICABLE LAND USE LAWS AND REGULATIONS. BEFORE SIGNING OR ACCEPTING THIS INSTRUMENT, THE PERSON ACQUIRING FEE TITLE TO THE PROPERTY SHOULD CHECK WITH THE APPROPRIATE CITY OR COUNTY PLANNING DEPARTMENT TO VERIFY THAT THE UNIT OF LAND BEING TRANSFERRED IS A LAWFULLY ESTABLISHED LOT OR PARCEL, AS DEFINED IN ORS 92.010 OR 215.010, TO VERIFY THE APPROVED USES OF THE LOT OR PARCEL,TO DETERMINE ANY LIMITS ON LAWSUITS AGAINST FARMING OR FOREST PRACTICES, AS DEFINED IN ORS 30.930, AND TO INQUIRE ABOUT THE RIGHTS OF NEIGHBORING PROPERTY OWNERS, IF ANY, UNDER ORS 195.300, 195.301 AND 195.305 TO 195.336 AND SECTIONS 5 TO 11,CHAPTER 424,OREGON LAWS 2007,AND SECTIONS 2 TO 9 AND 17,CHAPTER 855,OREGON LAWS 2009. Duty to Maintain. Grantor shall maintain the Property in tenantable condition and promptly perform all repairs, replacements, and maintenance necessary to preserve its value. Compliance With Environmental Laws. Grantor represents and warrants to Lender that: (1) During the period of Grantor's ownership of the Property.there has been no use,generation,manufacture,storage,treatment,disposal,release or threatened release of any Hazardous Substance by any person on,under,about or from the Property: (2) Grantor has no knowledge of,or reason to believe that there has been,except as previously disclosed to and acknowledged by Lender in writing, (a) any breach or violation of any Environmental Laws, (b) any use,generation,manufacture,storage,treatment,disposal,release or threatened release of any Hazardous Substance on,under, about or from the Property by any prior owners or occupants of the Property,or (c) any actual or threatened litigation or claims of any kind by any person relating to such matters;and (3) Except as previously disclosed to and acknowledged by Lender in writing, (a) neither Grantor nor any tenant,contractor,agent or other authorized user of the Property shall use,generate,manufacture,store,treat,dispose of or release any Hazardous Substance on,under,about or from the Property;and (b) any such activity shall be conducted in compliance with all applicable federal,state.and local laws,regulations and ordinances,including without limitation all Environmental Laws. Grantor authorizes Lender and its agents to enter upon the Property to make such inspections and tests,at Grantor's expense,as Lender may deem appropriate to determine compliance of the Property with this section of the Deed of Trust. Any inspections or tests made by Lender shall be for Lender's purposes only and shall not be construed to create any responsibility or liability on the part of Lender to Grantor or to any other person. The representations and warranties contained herein are based on Grantor's due diligence in investigating the Property for Hazardous Substances. Grantor hereby (1) releases and waives any future claims against Lender for indemnity or contribution in the event Grantor becomes liable for cleanup or other costs under any such laws;and (2) agrees to indemnify, defend,and hold harmless Lender against any and all claims,losses, liabilities,damages,penalties,and expenses which Lender may directly or indirectly sustain or suffer resulting from a breach of this section of the Deed of Trust or as a consequence of any use,generation, manufacture. storage. disposal,release or threatened release occurring prior to Grantor's ownership or interest in the Property,whether or not the same was or should have been known to Grantor. The provisions of this section of the,Deed of Trust,including the obligation to indemnify and defend, shall survive the payment of the Indebtedness and the satisfaction and reconveyance of the lien of this Deed of Trust and shall not be affected by Lender's acquisition of any interest in the Property,whether by foreclosure or otherwise. DEED OF TRUST (Continued) Page 2 Nuisance,Waste. Grantor shall not cause.conduct or permit any nuisance nor commit,permit,or suffer any stripping of or waste on or to the Property or any portion of the Property. Without limiting the generality of the foregoing,Grantor will not remove.or grant to any other party the right to remove.any timber.minerals(including oil and gas),coal,clay.scoria.soil,gravel or rock products without Lender's prior written consent. Removal of Improvements. Grantor shall not demolish or remove any Improvements from the Real Property without Lender's prior written consent. As a condition to the removal of any Improvements,Lender may require Grantor to make arrangements satisfactory to Lender to replace such Improvements with Improvements of at least equal value. Lenders Right to Enter. Lender and Lender's agents and representatives may enter upon the Real Property at all reasonable times to attend to Lender's interests and to inspect the Real Property for purposes of Grantors compliance with the terms and conditions of this Deed of Trust. Compliance with Governmental Requirements. Grantor shall promptly comply with all laws,ordinances,and regulations,now or hereafter In effect, of all governmental authorities applicable to the use or occupancy of the Property, including without limitation,the Americans With Disabilities Act. Grantor may contest in good faith any such law, ordinance, or regulation and withhold compliance during any proceeding,including appropriate appeals,so long as Grantor has notified Lender in writing prior to doing so and so long as,in Lender's sole opinion,Lender's interests in the Property are not jeopardized. Lender may require Grantor to post adequate security or a surety bond, reasonably satisfactory to Lender,to protect Lender's interest. Duty to Protect. Grantor agrees neither to abandon or leave unattended the Property. Grantor shall do all other acts,in addition to those acts set forth above in this section,which from the character and use of the Property are reasonably necessary to protect and preserve the Property. DUE ON SALE•CONSENT BY LENDER. Lender may,at Lender's option,declare immediately due and payable all sums secured by this Deed of Trust upon the sale or transfer,without Lender's prior written consent, of all or any part of the Real Property, or any interest in the Real Property. A"sale or transfer"means the conveyance of Real Property or any right,title or interest in the Real Property;whether legal,beneficial or equitable, whether voluntary or involuntary; whether by outright sale, deed, installment sale contract, land contract, contract for deed, leasehold interest with a term greater than three(3)years,lease-option contract,or by sale,assignment,or transfer of any beneficial interest in or to any land trust holding title to the Real Property.or by any other method of conveyance of an interest in the Real Property. If any Grantor is a corporation,partnership or limited liability company.transfer also includes any change in ownership of more than twenty-five percent(25%)of the voting stock,partnership interests or limited liability company interests,as the case may be.of such Grantor. However,this option shall not be exercised by Lender if such exercise is prohibited by federal law or by Oregon law. TAXES AND LIENS. The following provisions relating to the taxes and liens on the Property are part of this Deed of Trust: Payment. Grantor shall pay when due (and in all events prior to delinquency)all taxes, special taxes, assessments, charges (including water and sewer),fines and impositions levied against or on account of the Property,and shall pay when due all claims for work done on or for services rendered or material furnished to the Property. Grantor shall maintain the Property free of all liens having priority over or equal to the interest of Lender under this Deed of Trust,except for the lien of taxes and assessments not due and except as otherwise provided in this Deed of Trust. Right to Contest. Grantor may withhold payment of any tax, assessment, or claim in connection with a good faith dispute over the obligation to pay, so long as Lender's interest in the Property is not jeopardized. If a lien arises or is filed as a result of nonpayment, Grantor shall within fifteen(15)days after the lien arises or,if a lien is filed,within fifteen(15)days after Grantor has notice of the filing, secure the discharge of the lien,or if requested by Lender,deposit with Lender cash or a sufficient corporate surety bond or other security satisfactory to Lender in an amount sufficient to discharge the lien plus any costs and attorneys'fees,or other charges that could accrue as a result of a foreclosure or sale under the lien. In any contest.Grantor shall defend itself and Lender and shall satisfy any adverse judgment before enforcement against the Property. Grantor shalt name Lender as an additional obligee under any surety bond furnished in the contest proceedings. Evidence of Payment. Grantor shall upon demand furnish to Lender satisfactory evidence of payment of the taxes or assessments and shall authorize the appropriate governmental official to deliver to Lender at any time a written statement of the taxes and assessments against the Property. Notice of Construction. Grantor shall notify Lender at least fifteen(15)days before any work is commenced,any services are furnished,or any materials are supplied to the Property, if any mechanic's lien,materialmen's lien.or other lien could be asserted on account of the work,services,or materials. Grantor will upon request of Lender furnish to Lender advance assurances satisfactory to Lender that Grantor can and will pay the cost of such improvements. PROPERTY DAMAGE INSURANCE. The following provisions relating to insuring the Property are a part of this Deed of Trust. Maintenance of Insurance. Grantor shall procure and maintain policies of fire insurance with standard extended coverage endorsements on a fair value basis for the full insurable value covering all Improvements on the Real Property in an amount sufficient to avoid application of any coinsurance clause,and with a standard mortgagee clause in favor of Lender. Grantor shall also procure and maintain comprehensive general liability insurance in such coverage amounts as Lender may request with Trustee and Lender being named as additional insureds in such liability insurance policies. Additionally, Grantor shall maintain such other insurance, including but not limited to hazard,business interruption, and boiler insurance, as Lender may reasonably require. Policies shall be written in form, amounts, coverages and basis reasonably acceptable to Lender and issued by a company or companies reasonably acceptable to Lender. Grantor,upon request of Lender, will deliver to Lender from time to time the policies or certificates of insurance in form satisfactory to Lender, including stipulations that coverages will not be cancelled or diminished without at least ten(10)days prior written notice to Lender. Each insurance policy also shall include an endorsement providing that coverage in favor of Lender will not be impaired in any way by any act, omission or default of Grantor or any other person. Should the Real Property be located in an area designated by the Director of the Federal Emergency Management Agency as a special flood hazard area,Grantor agrees to obtain and maintain Federal Flood Insurance,if available,within 45 days after notice is given by Lender that the Property is located in a special flood hazard area,for the full unpaid principal balance of the loan and any prior liens on the property securing the loan.up to the maximum policy limits set under the National Flood Insurance Program, or as otherwise required by Lender,and to maintain such insurance for the term of the loan. Application of Proceeds. Grantor shall promptly notify Lender of any loss or damage to the Property. Lender may make proof of loss if Grantor fails to do so within fifteen (15)days of the casualty. Whether or not Lender's security is impaired, Lender may, at Lender's election,receive and retain the proceeds of any insurance and apply the proceeds to the reduction of the Indebtedness,payment of any lien affecting the Property,or the restoration and repair of the Property. If Lender elects to apply the proceeds to restoration and repair,Grantor shall repair or replace the damaged or destroyed Improvements in a manner satisfactory to Lender. Lender shall,upon satisfactory proof of such expenditure,pay or reimburse Grantor from the proceeds for the reasonable cost of repair or restoration if Grantor is not in default under this Deed of Trust. Any proceeds which have not been disbursed within 180 days after their receipt and which Lender has not committed to the repair or restoration of the Property shall be used first to pay any amount owing to Lender under this Deed of Trust,then to pay accrued interest, and the remainder, if any, shall be applied to the principal balance of the Indebtedness. If Lender holds any proceeds after payment in full of the Indebtedness.such proceeds shall be paid to Grantor as Grantor's interests may appear. Grantor's Report on Insurance. Upon request of Lender,however not more than once a year,Grantor shall furnish to Lender a report on each existing policy of insurance showing. (1) the name of the insurer; (2) the risks insured; (3) the amount of the policy; (4) the property insured,the then current replacement value of such property,and the manner of determining that value;and (5) the expiration date of the policy. Grantor shall,upon request of Lender,have an independent appraiser satisfactory to Lender determine the cash value replacement cost of the Property. LENDER'S EXPENDITURES. If any action or proceeding is commenced that would materially affect Lender's interest in the Property or if Grantor fails to comply with any provision of this Deed of Trust or any Related Documents,including but not limited to Grantor's failure to discharge or pay when due any amounts Grantor is required to discharge or pay under this Deed of Trust or any Related Documents,Lender on Grantor's behalf may but shall not be obligated to)take any action that Lender deems appropriate,including but not limited to discharging or paying all taxes.liens,security interests,encumbrances and other claims,at any time levied or placed on the Property and paying all costs for insuring, maintaining and preserving the Property All such expenditures incurred or paid by Lender for such purposes will then bear interest at the rate charged under the Note from the date incurred or paid by Lender to the date of repayment by Grantor. All such expenses will become a part of the Indebtedness and,at Lender's option,will (A) be payable on demand; (B) be added to the balance of the Note and be apportioned among and be payable with any installment payments to become due during either (1) the term of any applicable insurance policy; or (2) the remaining term of the Note;or (C) be treated as a balloon payment which will be due and payable at the Note's maturity. The Deed of Trust also will secure payment of these amounts. Such right shall be in addition to all other rights and remedies to which Lender may be entitled upon DEED OF TRUST (Continued) Page 3 Default. WARRANTY;DEFENSE OF TITLE. The following provisions relating to ownership of the Property are a part of this Deed of Trust: Title. Grantor warrants that: (a)Grantor holds good and marketable title of record to the Property in fee simple,free and clear of all liens and encumbrances other than those set forth in the Real Property description or in any title insurance policy,title report,or final title opinion issued in favor of,and accepted by,Lender in connection with this Deed of Trust,and (b)Grantor has the full right,power,and authority to execute and deliver this Deed of Trust to Lender. Defense of Title. Subject to the exception in the paragraph above,Grantor warrants and will forever defend the title to the Property against the lawful claims of all persons. In the event any action or proceeding is commenced that questions Grantor's title or the interest of Trustee or Lender under this Deed of Trust,Grantor shall defend the action at Grantor's expense. Grantor may be the nominal party in such proceeding, but Lender shall be entitled to participate in the proceeding and to be represented in the proceeding by counsel of Lender's own choice,and Grantor will deliver,or cause to be delivered,to Lender such instruments as Lender may request from time to time to permit such participation. Compliance With Laws. Grantor warrants that the Property and Grantor's use of the Property complies with all existing applicable laws, ordinances,and regulations of governmental authorities. Survival of Representations and Warranties. All representations,warranties,and agreements made by Grantor in this Deed of Trust shall survive the execution and delivery of this Deed of Trust,shall be continuing in nature,and shall remain in full force and effect until such time as Grantor's Indebtedness shall be paid in full. CONDEMNATION. The following provisions relating to condemnation proceedings are a part of this Deed of Trust: Proceedings. If any proceeding in condemnation is filed,Grantor shall promptly notify Lender in writing,and Grantor shall promptly take such steps as may be necessary to defend the action and obtain the award. Grantor may be the nominal party in such proceeding,but Lender shall be entitled to participate in the proceeding and to be represented in the proceeding by counsel of its own choice,and Grantor will deliver or cause to be delivered to Lender such instruments and documentation as may be requested by Lender from time to time to permit such participation. Application of Net Proceeds. If all or any part of the Property is condemned by eminent domain proceedings or by any proceeding or purchase in lieu of condemnation,Lender may at its election require that all or any portion of the net proceeds of the award be applied to the Indebtedness or the repair or restoration of the Property. The net proceeds of the award shall mean the award after payment of all reasonable costs,expenses,and attorneys'fees incurred by Trustee or Lender in connection with the condemnation. IMPOSITION OF TAXES,FEES AND CHARGES BY GOVERNMENTAL AUTHORITIES. The following provisions relating to governmental taxes, fees and charges are a part of this Deed of Trust: Current Taxes,Fees and Charges. Upon request by Lender,Grantor shall execute such documents in addition to this Deed of Trust and take whatever other action is requested by Lender to perfect and continue Lender's lien on the Real Property. Grantor shall reimburse Lender for all taxes, as described below, together with all expenses incurred in recording, perfecting or continuing this Deed of Trust, including without limitation all taxes,fees,documentary stamps,and other charges for recording or registering this Deed of Trust. Taxes. The following shall constitute taxes to which this section applies: (1) a specific tax upon this type of Deed of Trust or upon all or any part of the Indebtedness secured by this Deed of Trust: (2) a specific tax on Grantor which Grantor is authorized or required to deduct from payments on the Indebtedness secured by this type of Deed of Trust; (3) a tax on this type of Deed of Trust chargeable against the Lender or the holder of the Note:and (4) a specific tax on all or any portion of the Indebtedness or on payments of principal and interest made by Grantor. Subsequent Taxes. If any tax to which this section applies is enacted subsequent to the date of this Deed of Trust,this event shall have the same effect as an Event of Default,and Lender may exercise any or all of its available remedies for an Event of Default as provided below unless Grantor either (1) pays the tax before it becomes delinquent,or (2) contests the tax as provided above in the Taxes and Liens section and deposits with Lender cash or a sufficient corporate surety bond or other security satisfactory to Lender. SECURITY AGREEMENT;FINANCING STATEMENTS. The following provisions relating to this Doed of Trust as a security agreement are a part of this Deed of Trust: Security Agreement. This instrument shall constitute a Security Agreement to the extent any of the Property constitutes fixtures, and Lender shall have all of the rights of a secured party under the Uniform Commercial Code as amended from time to time. Security Interest. Upon request by Lender, Grantor shall take whatever action is requested by Lender to perfect and continue Lender's security interest in the Rents and Personal Property. In addition to recording this Deed of Trust in the real property records,Lender may,at any time and without further authorization from Grantor,file executed counterparts,copies or reproductions of this Deed of Trust as a financing statement. Grantor shall reimburse Lender for all expenses incurred in perfecting or continuing this security interest. Upon default, Grantor shall not remove, sever or detach the Personal Property from the Property. Upon default, Grantor shall assemble any Personal Property not affixed to the Property in a manner and at a place reasonably convenient to Grantor and Lender and make it available to Lender within three(3)days after receipt of written demand from Lender to the extent permitted by applicable law. Addresses. The mailing addresses of Grantor(debtor)and Lender(secured party)from which information concerning the security interest granted by this Deed of Trust may be obtained(each as required by the Uniform Commercial Code)are as stated on the first page of this Deed of Trust. FURTHER ASSURANCES; ATTORNEY-IN-FACT. The following provisions relating to further assurances and attorney-in-fact are a part of this Deed of Trust: Further Assurances. At any time,and from time to time,upon request of Lender,Grantor will make,execute and deliver,or will cause to be made,executed or delivered,to Lender or to Lender's designee,and when requested by Lender,cause to be filed,recorded,refiled,or rerecorded,as the case may be,at such times and in such offices and places as Lender may deem appropriate,any and all such mortgages, deeds of trust, security deeds, security agreements, financing statements, continuation statements, instruments of further assurance, certificates,and other documents as may,in the sole opinion of Lender,be necessary or desirable in order to effectuate,complete,perfect, continue,or preserve (1) Grantor's obligations under the Note,this Deed of Trust,and the Related Documents,and (2) the liens and security interests created by this Deed of Trust as first and prior liens on the Property, whether now owned or hereafter acquired by Grantor. Unless prohibited by law or Lender agrees to the contrary in writing,Grantor shall reimburse Lender for all costs and expenses incurred in connection with the matters referred to in this paragraph. Attorney-in-Fact. If Grantor fails to do any of the things referred to in the preceding paragraph,Lender may do so for and in the name of Grantor and at Grantor's expense. For such purposes, Grantor hereby irrevocably appoints Lender as Grantor's attorney-in-fact for the purpose of making, executing,delivering,filing, recording, and doing all other things as may be necessary or desirable,in Lender's sole opinion,to accomplish the matters referred to in the preceding paragraph. FULL PERFORMANCE. If Grantor pays all the Indebtedness when due,and otherwise performs all the obligations imposed upon Grantor under this Deed of Trust,Lender shall execute and deliver to Trustee a request for full reconveyance and shall execute and deliver to Grantor suitable statements of termination of any financing statement on file evidencing Lender's security interest in the Rents and the Personal Property. Any reconveyance fee required by law shall be paid by Grantor,if permitted by applicable law. EVENTS OF DEFAULT. Each of the following,at Lender's option,shall constitute an Event of Default under this Deed of Trust: Payment Default. Grantor fails to make any payment when due under the Indebtedness. Other Defaults. Grantor fails to comply with or to perform any other term,obligation,covenant or condition contained in this Deed of Trust or in any of the Related Documents or to comply with or to perform any term,obligation,covenant or condition contained in any other agreement between Lender and Grantor. Compliance Default. Failure to comply with any other term,obligation,covenant or condition contained in this Deed of Trust,the Note or in any of the Related Documents. Default on Other Payments. Failure of Grantor within the time required by this Deed of Trust to make any payment for taxes or insurance, or any other payment necessary to prevent filing of or to effect discharge of any lien. Default in Favor of Third Parties. Should Grantor default under any loan, extension of credit, security agreement, purchase or sales DEED OF TRUST (Continued) Page 4 agreement, or any other agreement, in favor of any other creditor or person that may materially affect any of Grantor's property or Grantor's ability to repay the Indebtedness or Grantor's ability to perform Grantor's obligations under this Deed of Trust or any of the Related Documents. False Statements. Any warranty, representation or statement made or furnished to Lender by Grantor or on Grantor's behalf under this Deed of Trust or the Related Documents is false or misleading in any material respect,either now or at the time made or furnished or becomes false or misleading at any time thereafter. Defective Collateralization. This Deed of Trust or any of the Related Documents ceases to be in full force and effect(including failure of any collateral document to create a valid and perfected security interest or lien)at any time and for any reason. Death or Insolvency. The dissolution of Grantor's(regardless of whether election to continue is made),any member withdraws from the limited liability company,or any other termination of Grantor's existence as a going business or the death of any member,the insolvency of Grantor,the appointment of a receiver for any part of Grantor's property,any assignment for the benefit of creditors,any type of creditor workout,or the commencement of any proceeding under any bankruptcy or insolvency laws by or against Grantor. Creditor or Forfeiture Proceedings. Commencement of foreclosure or forfeiture proceedings,whether by judicial proceeding, self-help, repossession or any other method, by any creditor of Grantor or by any governmental agency against any property securing the Indebtedness. This includes a garnishment of any of Grantor's accounts,including deposit accounts,with Lender. However,this Event of Default shall not apply if there is a good faith dispute by Grantor as to the validity or reasonableness of the claim which is the basis of the creditor or forfeiture proceeding and if Grantor gives Lender written notice of the creditor or forfeiture proceeding and deposits with Lender monies or a surety bond for the creditor or forfeiture proceeding,in an amount determined by Lender,in its sole discretion,as being an adequate reserve or bond for the dispute. Breach of Other Agreement. Any breach by Grantor under the terms of any other agreement between Grantor and Lender that is not remedied within any grace period provided therein, including without limitation any agreement concerning any indebtedness or other obligation of Grantor to Lender,whether existing now or later. Events Affecting Guarantor. Any of the preceding events occurs with respect to any Guarantor of any of the Indebtedness or any Guarantor dies or becomes incompetent,or revokes or disputes the validity of,or liability under,any Guaranty of the Indebtedness. Adverse Change. A material adverse change occurs in Grantor's financial condition, or Lender believes the prospect of payment or performance of the Indebtedness is impaired. RIGHTS AND REMEDIES ON DEFAULT. If an Event of Default occurs under this Deed of Trust,at any time thereafter,Trustee or Lender may exercise any one or more of the following rights and remedies: Election of Remedies. Election by Lender to pursue any remedy shall not exclude pursuit of any other remedy,and an election to make expenditures or to take action to perform an obligation of Grantor under this Deed of Trust.after Grantor's failure to perform,shall not affect Lender's right to declare a default and exercise its remedies. Accelerate Indebtedness. Lender shall have the right at its option without notice to Grantor to declare the entire Indebtedness immediately due and payable,including any prepayment penalty which Grantor would be required to pay. Foreclosure. With respect to all or any part of the Real Property,the Trustee shall have the right to foreclose by notice and sale, and Lender shall have the right to foreclose by judicial foreclosure, in either case in accordance with and to the full extent provided by applicable law. If this Deed of Trust is foreclosed by judicial foreclosure,Lender will be entitled to a judgment which will provide that if the foreclosure sale proceeds are insufficient to satisfy the judgment, execution may issue for the amount of the unpaid balance of the judgment. UCC Remedies. With respect to all or any part of the Personal Property, Lender shall have all the rights and remedies of a secured party under the Uniform Commercial Code. Collect Rents. Lender shall have the right,without notice to Grantor to take possession of and manage the Property and collect the Rents, including amounts past due and unpaid, and apply the net proceeds, over and above Lender's costs, against the Indebtedness. In furtherance of this right, Lender may require any tenant or other user of the Property to make payments of rent or use fees directly to Lender. If the Rents are collected by Lender, then Grantor irrevocably designates Lender as Grantor's attorney-in-fact to endorse instruments received in payment thereof in the name of Grantor and to negotiate the same and collect the proceeds. Payments by tenants or other users to Lender in response to Lender's demand shall satisfy the obligations for which the payments are made,whether or not any proper grounds for the demand existed. Lender may exercise its rights under this subparagraph either in person,by agent,or through a receiver. Appoint Receiver. Lender shall have the right to have a receiver appointed to take possession of all or any part of the Property,with the power to protect and preserve the Property, to operate the Property preceding foreclosure or sale, and to collect the Rents from the Property and apply the proceeds,over and above the cost of the receivership,against the Indebtedness. The receiver may serve without bond if permitted by law. Lender's right to the appointment of a receiver shall exist whether or not the apparent value of the Property exceeds the Indebtedness by a substantial amount. Employment by Lender shall not disqualify a person from serving as a receiver. Tenancy at Sufferance. If Grantor remains in possession of the Property after the Property is sold as provided above or Lender otherwise becomes entitled to possession of the Property upon default of Grantor. Grantor shall become a tenant at sufferance of Lender or the purchaser of the Property and shall,at Lender's option,either (1) pay a reasonable rental for the use of the Property,or (2) vacate the Property immediately upon the demand of Lender. Other Remedies. Trustee or Lender shall have any other right or remedy provided in this Deed of Trust or the Note or available at law or in equity. Notice of Sale. Lender shall give Grantor reasonable notice of the time and place of any public sale of the Personal Property or of the time after which any private sale or other intended disposition of the Personal Property is to be made. Reasonable notice shall mean notice given at least fifteen(15)days before the time of the sale or disposition. Any sale of the Personal Property may be made in conjunction with any sale of the Real Property. Sale of the Property. To the extent permitted by applicable law,Grantor hereby waives any and all rights to have the Property marshalled. In exercising its rights and remedies,the Trustee or Lender shall be free to sell all or any part of the Property together or separately,in one sale or by separate sales. Lender shall be entitled to bid at any public sale on all or any portion of the Property. Attorneys'Fees;Expenses. If Lender institutes any suit or action to enforce any of the terms of this Deed of Trust,Lender shall be entitled to recover such sum as the court may adjudge reasonable as attorneys'fees at trial and upon any appeal. Whether or not any court action is involved, and to the extent not prohibited by law,all reasonable expenses Lender incurs that in Lender's opinion are necessary at any time for the protection of its interest or the enforcement of its rights shall become a part of the Indebtedness payable on demand and shall bear interest at the Note rate from the date of the expenditure until repaid. Expenses covered by this paragraph include,without limitation, however subject to any limits under applicable law,Lender's attorneys'fees and Lender's legal expenses,whether or not there is a lawsuit, including attorneys'fees and expenses for bankruptcy proceedings(including efforts to modify or vacate any automatic stay or injunction). appeals,and any anticipated post-judgment collection services,the cost of searching records,obtaining title reports(including foreclosure reports),surveyors'reports,and appraisal fees,title insurance,and fees for the Trustee,to the extent permitted by applicable law. Grantor also will pay any court costs,in addition to all other sums provided by law. Rights of Trustee. Trustee shall have all of the rights and duties of Lender as set forth in this section. POWERS AND OBLIGATIONS OF TRUSTEE. The following provisions relating to the powers and obligations of Trustee are part of this Deed of Trust: Powers of Trustee. In addition to all powers of Trustee arising as a matter of law.Trustee shall have the power to take the following actions with respect to the Property upon the written request of Lender and Grantor (a)join in prepanng and filing a map or plat of the Real Property,including the dedication of streets or other rights to the public; (b)join in granting any easement or creating any restriction on the Real Property;and (c)join in any subordination or other agreement affecting this Deed of Trust or the interest of Lender under this Deed of Trust. • Obligations to Notify. Trustee shall not be obligated to notify any other party of a pending sale under any other trust deed or lien,or of any action or proceeding in which Grantor,Lender,or Trustee shall be a party,unless the action or proceeding is brought by Trustee. DEED OF TRUST (Continued) Page 5 Trustee. Trustee shall meet all qualifications required for Trustee under applicable law. In addition to the rights and remedies set forth above.with respect to all or any part of the Property,the Trustee shall have the right to foreclose by notice and sale,and Lender shall have the right to foreclose by judicial foreclosure,in either case in accordance with and to the full extent provided by applicable law. Successor Trustee. Lender, at Lender's option, may from time to time appoint a successor Trustee to any Trustee appointed under this Deed of Trust by an instrument executed and acknowledged by Lender and recorded in the office of the recorder of WASHINGTON County, State of Oregon. The instrument shall contain. in addition to all other matters required by state law,the names of the original Lender, Trustee,and Grantor,the book and page where this Deed of Trust is recorded,and the name and address of the successor trustee,and the instrument shall be executed and acknowledged by Lender or its successors in interest. The successor trustee,without conveyance of the Property,shall succeed to all the title, power,and duties conferred upon the Trustee in this Deed of Trust and by applicable law. This procedure for substitution of Trustee shall govern to the exclusion of all other provisions for substitution. NOTICES. Any notice required to be given under this Deed of Trust,including without limitation any notice of default and any notice of sale shall be given in writing,and shall be effective when actually delivered,when actually received by telefacsimile(unless otherwise required by law),when deposited with a nationally recognized overnight courier,or, if mailed,when deposited in the United States mail,as first class, certified or registered mail postage prepaid,directed to the addresses shown near the beginning of this Deed of Trust. All copies of notices of foreclosure from the holder of any lien which has priority over this Deed of Trust shall be sent to Lender's address,as shown near the beginning of this Deed of Trust. Any party may change its address for notices under this Deed of Trust by giving formal written notice to the other parties,specifying that the purpose of the notice is to change the party's address. For notice purposes,Grantor agrees to keep Lender informed at all times of Grantor's current address. Unless otherwise provided or required by law,if there is more than one Grantor,any notice given by Lender to any Grantor is deemed to be notice given to all Grantors. ADDITIONAL COLLATERAL; SECURITY AGREEMENT. Grantor hereby grants and conveys to Lender a Uniform Commercial Code security interest in the following additional collateral(collectively,the"Additional Collateral"),whether now owned or hereafter acquired by Grantor:(a) all Personal Property, (b) all Rents, (c) all building materials, supplies, inventory, equipment, fixtures, furnishings and/or other goods (but excluding any household goods) intended for use, used, or usable in the construction, repair, renovation, operation or maintenance of improvements constructed or to be constructed on the Real Property,(d)all construction,engineering,and architectural contracts and all plans, drawings and specifications relating to the construction,repair or renovation of improvements on the Real Property,and(e)all attachments, accessories and accessions to any of the foregoing and all replacements of and proceeds from the foregoing. This Instrument shall constitute a Security Agreement as to the Additional Collateral,and Lender shall have all of the rights with respect thereto of a secured party under the Uniform Commercial Code as enacted and amended from time to time in the state in which the Real Property is located. Lender is authorized to file at Grantor's expense such financing statements and other filings as Lender shall deem appropriate to perfect and continue Lender's security interest in the Additional Collateral. Grantor shall reimburse Lender for all expenses incurred in perfecting or continuing this security interest. Upon default, Grantor shall not remove, sever or detach any Additional Collateral from the Real Property, and Grantor shall assemble all Additional Collateral not affixed to the Property in a manner and at a place reasonably convenient to Grantor and Lender and make it available to Lender within three days after receipt of written demand from Lender to the extent permitted by applicable law. The mailing addresses of Grantor(debtor)and Lender(secured party)from which information concerning the security interest granted by this instrument may be obtained (each as required by the Uniform Commercial Code)are as stated on the first page of this Deed of Trust. This provision is in addition to(and does not supersede)any other provision of this Deed of Trust granting Lender a security Interest in personal property. CHANGES AND FTURE ADVANCES. The terms of any Note, Credit Agreement, Related Document or other Instrument evidencing the Indebtedness or any other obligation secured by this instrument may be changed from time to time by agreement between the holder(s)thereof and the parties obligated thereon as maker(s)without affecting or Impairing the priority of the lien of this Deed of Trust. Changes may include, but are not limited to,those actions enumerated in section 86.095 of the Oregon Revised Statutes(as the same may be amended from time to time) and the renewal, extension, modification, amendment, refinancing, restatement and/or Increase of the obligation. For example, the holder(s)and maker(s)may agree to(a)increase or decrease the Interest rate,(b)convert the obligation to or from a closed-end or an open-end obligation,(c)convert the obligation to or from a fixed interest rate obligation or an adjustable interest rate obligation,(d)increase or decrease the payment amount,(e)change the payment schedule,(f)extend or shorten the time during which future advances may be made,(g)advance and/or re-advance loan proceeds, (h) amortize a balloon payment, (I)extend or shorten the maturity date, (j) increase the principal or face amount of the Note or Credit Agreement, and/or(5)any combination of the foregoing. To the extent permitted by law,the obligation as so changed from time to time and all future advances and re-advances relating thereto shall be and continue to be secured by this instrument with a priority as of the date this Instrument is filed or recorded,regardless of whether any record of such change is filed or recorded or when funds are advanced or re-advanced. This Deed of Trust shall secure future advances to the maximum extent permitted by applicable law,Including, but not limited to,the provisions of section 86.155 of the Oregon Revised Statutes,as the same may be amended from time to time. RIGHT TO CURE.Prior to accelerating the Indebtedness secured by this instrument,Lender shall give such notice and opportunity to cure as may be required by the Note or Credit Agreement secured by this instrument. The provisions of this section shall not supersede or limit the application of any controlling provisions of state law concerning notice of default,the right to cure,or the right to reinstate,and nothing in this instrument shall be deemed a waiver of those provisions;provided,however,that the provisions of the Note or Credit Agreement and any such state law requirements shall run concurrently. INFORMATION ABOUT OTHER LIENS.Lender is authorized to obtain such information about other liens or claims of lien on the Real Property as Lender may reasonably request from the each creditor or other person or entity that has,claims to have,or asserts a lien on the Real Property. The information requested may include,but is not limited to,the nature of the lien or claim of lien,the circumstances under which the lien or claim of lien arose,and the amount required to satisfy the lien or claim of lien.The creditors or other persons or entities that have,claim to have,or assert a lien on the Real Property are authorized and directed to promptly provide to Lender the information requested by Lender.This provision applies whether the lien or claim of lien is superior or subordinate in priority to the lien of this instrument. MISCELLANEOUS PROVISIONS. The following miscellaneous provisions are a part of this Deed of Trust: Amendments. This Deed of Trust,together with any Related Documents,constitutes the entire understanding and agreement of the parties as to the matters set forth in this Deed of Trust. No alteration of or amendment to this Deed of Trust shall be effective unless given in writing and signed by the party or parties sought to be charged or bound by the alteration or amendment. Annual Reports. if the Property is used for purposes other than Grantor's residence, Grantor shall furnish to Lender, upon request, a certified statement of net operating income received from the Property during Grantor's previous fiscal year in such form and detail as Lender shall require. "Net operating income"shall mean all cash receipts from the Property less all cash expenditures made in connection with the operation of the Properly. Caption Headings. Caption headings in this Deed of Trust are for convenience purposes only and are not to be used to interpret or define the provisions of this Deed of Trust. Merger. There shall be no merger of the interest or estate created by this Deed of Trust with any other interest or estate in the Property at any time held by or for the benefit of Lender in any capacity,without the written consent of Lender. Governing Law. This Deed of Trust will be governed by federal law applicable to Lender and,to the extent not preempted by federal law, the laws of the State of Oregon without regard to its conflicts of law provisions. This Deed of Trust has been accepted by Lender in the State of Oregon. No Waiver by Lender. Lender shall not be deemed to have waived any rights under this Deed of Trust unless such waiver is given in writing and signed by Lender. No delay or omission on the part of Lender in exercising any right shall operate as a waiver of such right or any other right. A waiver by Lender of a provision of this Deed of Trust shall not prejudice or constitute a waiver of Lender's right otherwise to demand strict compliance with that provision or any other provision of this Deed of Trust. No prior waiver by Lender,nor any course of dealing between Lender and Grantor,shall constitute a waiver of any of Lender's rights or of any of Grantor's obligations as to any future transactions. Whenever the consent of Lender is required under this Deed of Trust,the granting of such consent by Lender in any instance shall not constitute continuing consent to subsequent instances where such consent is required and in all cases such consent may be granted or withheld in the sole discretion of Lender. Severability. If a court of competent jurisdiction finds any provision of this Deed of Trust to be illegal,invalid,or unenforceable as to any circumstance,that finding shall not make the offending provision illegal,invalid,or unenforceable as to any other circumstance. If feasible, the offending provision shall be considered modified so that it becomes legal,valid and enforceable. If the offending provision cannot be so modified, it shall be considered deleted from this Deed of Trust. Unless otherwise required by law, the illegality, invalidity, or unenforceability of any provision of this Deed of Trust shall not affect the legality,validity or enforceability of any other provision of this Deed of Trust. Successors and Assigns. Subject to any limitations stated in this Deed of Trust on transfer of Grantor's interest,this Deed of Trust shall be • DEED OF TRUST (Continued) Page 6 binding upon and inure to the benefit of the parties,their successors and assigns. If ownership of the Property becomes vested in a person other than Grantor,Lender,without notice to Grantor,may deal with Grantor's successors with reference to this Deed of Trust and the Indebtedness by way of forbearance or extension without releasing Grantor from the obligations of this Deed of Trust or liability under the Indebtedness. Time is of the Essence. Time is of the essence in the performance of this Deed of Trust. Waive Jury. All parties to this Deed of Trust hereby waive the right to any Jury trial In any action,proceeding,or counterclaim brought by any party against any other party. Waiver of Homestead Exemption. Grantor hereby releases and waives all rights and benefits of the homestead exemption laws of the State of Oregon as to all Indebtedness secured by this Deed of Trust. Commercial Dead of Trust. Grantor agrees with Lender that this Deed of Trust is a commercial deed of trust and that Grantor will not change the use of the Property without Lender's prior written consent. DEFINITIONS. The following capitalized words and terms shall have the following meanings when used in this Deed of Trust. Unless specifically stated to the contrary,all references to dollar amounts shall mean amounts in lawful money of the United Stales of America. Words and terms used in the singular shall include the plural,and the plural shall include the singular,as the context may require. Words and terms not otherwise defined in this Deed of Trust shall have the meanings attributed to such terms in the Uniform Commercial Code. Beneficiary. The word"Beneficiary"means First-Citizens Bank 8 Trust Company,and its successors and assigns. Borrower. The word"Borrower"means CDBK PROPERTIES,LLC and includes all co-signers and co-makers signing the Note and all their successors and assigns. Deed of Trust. The words"Deed of Trust"mean this Deed of Trust among Grantor,Lender,and Trustee,and includes without limitation all assignment and security interest provisions relating to the Personal Property and Rents. Default. The word"Default"means the Default set forth in this Deed of Trust in the section titled"Default". Environmental Laws. The words"Environmental Laws"mean any and all state, federal and local statutes, regulations and ordinances relating to the protection of human health or the environment,including without limitation the Comprehensive Environmental Response, Compensation, and Liability Act of 1980, as amended,42 U.S.C. Section 9601, et seq. ("CERCLA"),the Superfund Amendments and Reauthorization Act of 1986,Pub.L.No.99-499("SARA"),the Hazardous Materials Transportation Act,49 U.S.C.Section 1801,et seq., the Resource Conservation and Recovery Act, 42 U.S.C. Section 6901, et seq., or other applicable state or federal laws, rules, or regulations adopted pursuant thereto or intended to protect human health or the environment. Event of Default. The words"Event of Default"mean any of the events of default set forth in this Deed of Trust in the events of default section of this Deed of Trust. Grantor. The word"Grantor"means CDBK PROPERTIES,LLC. Guarantor. The word"Guarantor"means any guarantor,surety,or accommodation party of any or all of the Indebtedness. Guaranty. The word"Guaranty"means the guaranty from Guarantor to Lender,including without limitation a guaranty of all or part of the Note. Hazardous Substances. The words"Hazardous Substances" mean materials that, because of their quantity, concentration or physical, chemical or infectious characteristics, may cause or pose a present or potential hazard to human health or the environment when improperly used, treated, stored, disposed of. generated, manufactured, transported or otherwise handled. The words "Hazardous Substances"are used in their very broadest sense and include without limitation any and all hazardous or toxic substances,materials or waste as defined by or listed under the Environmental Laws. The term "Hazardous Substances" also includes, without limitation, petroleum,including crude oil and any fraction thereof and asbestos. Improvements. The word"Improvements"means all existing and future improvements,buildings,structures,mobile homes affixed on the Real Property,facilities,additions,replacements and other construction on the Real Property. Indebtedness. The word"Indebtedness"means all principal,interest,and other amounts,costs and expenses payable under the Note or Related Documents, together with all renewals of, extensions of, modifications of, consolidations of and substitutions for the Note or Related Documents and any amounts expended or advanced by Lender to discharge Grantor's obligations or expenses incurred by Trustee or Lender to enforce Grantor's obligations under this Deed of Trust, together with interest on such amounts as provided in this Deed of Trust. Lender. The word"Lender"means First-Citizens Bank&Trust Company,its successors and assigns. Note. The word"Note"means the promissory note dated November 2,2011,in the original principal amount of$190,725.00 from Grantor to Lender,together with all renewals of,extensions of,modifications of,refinancings of,consolidations of,and substitutions for the promissory note or agreement. The maturity date of the Note is November 10,2014. Personal Property. The words"Personal Property"mean all equipment,fixtures,and other articles of personal property now or hereafter owned by Grantor,and now or hereafter attached or affixed to the Real Property;together with all accessions,parts,and additions to,all replacements of,and all substitutions for,any of such property;and together with all proceeds(including without limitation all insurance proceeds and refunds of premiums)from any sale or other disposition of the Property. Property. The word"Property"means collectively the Real Property and the Personal Property. Real Property. The words"Real Property"mean the real property,interests and rights,as further described in this Deed of Trust. Related Documents. The words "Related Documents" mean all promissory notes, credit agreements, loan agreements, environmental agreements,guaranties, security agreements,mortgages,deeds of trust,security deeds, collateral mortgages,and all other instruments, agreements and documents,whether now or hereafter existing,executed in connection with the Indebtedness. Rents. The word"Rents"means all present and future rents,revenues,income,issues,royalties,profits,and other benefits derived from the Property. Trustee. The word"Trustee"means Valerie A.Tomasi.Esq.,whose address is 121 SW Morrison St,Suite 600,Portland,OR 97204 and any substitute or successor trustees. GRANTOR ACKNOWLEDGES HAVING READ ALL THE PROVISIONS OF THIS DEED OF TRUST,AND GRANTOR AGREES TO ITS TERMS. GRANTOR: CDBK PROP • IES,LLC • BY A6 I A.4 =RAN'o:'JASON 'WI DT, Member of CDBK PROP,'TIES,LLC • DEED OF TRUST (Continued) Page 7 LIMITED LIABILITY COMPANY ACKNOWLEDGMENT + OFFICIAL SEAL STATE OF ) ;u; J LYKE SS NOTARY SIGN N•OREGON COMMISSION N0.430936 COUNTY OF �11 J •-' (,p •�) MYCOMMISSIONEXPIRESAUGUST27,2012 On this �/��day of N t�V e-•V4'!�^ ,20 U ,before me,the undersigned Notary Public,personally appeared BRANDON JASON SCHWINDT,Member of CDBK PROPERTIES,LLC,and known to me to be a member or designated agent of the limited liability company that executed the Deed of Trust and acknowledged the Deed of Trust to be the free and voluntary act and deed of the limited liability company, by authority of statute, its articles of organization or Its operating agreement,for the uses and purposes therein mentioned,and on oath stated thah- •r she is authorized to execute this Deed of Trust and in fact executed the Deed of Trust on behalf of the limited liability company. / By +��I Residing at t Notary Public in and for the St My commission expires 9/a.'/gb/y REQUEST FOR FULL RECONVEYANCE (To be used only when obligations have been paid in full) To: ,Trustee The undersigned is the legal owner and holder of all Indebtedness secured by this Deed of Trust. All sums secured by this Deed of Trust have been fully paid and satisfied. You are hereby directed,upon payment to you of any sums owing to you under the terms of this Deed of Trust or pursuant to any applicable statute,to cancel the Note secured by this Deed of Trust(which is delivered to you together with this Deed of Trust), and to reconvey,without warranty,to the parties designated by the terms of this Deed of Trust,the estate now held by you under this Deed of Trust. Please mail the reconveyance and Related Documents to: Date: Beneficiary: By: Its: LASER PRO Lending, Ver. 5.57.10.001 Copr. Harland Financial Solutions, Inc. 1997, 2011. All Rights Reserved. - OR F:\LPL\CFI\LPL\G01.FC TR-6002501 PR-577 RECEIVED SCHEDULE C FEB 0 32012 Ile No. 472511490138JL-CT50 CITY OF TIGARD Policy No. 472511490138JL The Land referred to in this policy is described as follows: PLANNING/ENGINEERING PARCEL: I A portion of Lot 17, WILLOWBROOK FARM, in the City of Tigard, County of Washington and State of Oregon, being more particularly described as follows: Commencing at a point on the North line of that tract described in Deed Book 849, Page 19, Washington County Records located North 627.99 feet and East 179.49 feet from the quarter corner on the South line of Section 10, Township 2 South, Range 1 West, Willamette Meridian; thence South 00°19'16" East, 165.00 feet; thence North 89°40'44" East, 95.00 feet; thence South 00°19'16" East, 80.00 feet; thence South 68°46'57" East, 84.67 feet; thence South 21°13'03" West, 104.00 feet; thence South 68°46'57" East, 52.00 feet; thence South 26°39'32"West, 39.47 feet to the Northerly line of S.W. Summerfield Drive; thence along the arc of S.W. Summerfield Drive on a radius curve, 130.00 feet, having a central angle of 79°35'12", the chord of which bears South 76°51'56"West, 166.41 feet the arc distance of 180.58 feet being to the right of the chord; said point being an angle point in that tract conveyed to Sunday Consumer, Inc., by Deed recorded July 10, 1979 in Fee Number 79-026990, Washington County Records, and the true point of beginning of the tract to be described; thence along said Sunday Consumer Tract, North 52°55'40"West 23.76 feet; thence South 89°52'07" West, 111.19 feet; thence South 00°07'53" East, 77.44 feet; thence South 20°24'46" West, 59.08 feet to the arc on the Northerly line of S.W. Durham Road; thence East along the Northerly line of S.W. Durham Road to the East line of that tract of land conveyed to Tualatin Development Co., Inc., by Deed recorded March 20, 1963 in Book 686, Page 143, Records of Washington County; thence North along the East line of said Tualatin Development Co. Tract to a point on the West line of S.W. Summerfield Drive; thence North along the West line of said S.W. Summerfield Drive to the point of beginning. Parcel II: A portion of Lot 17, WILLOWBROOK FARM, in the City of Tigard, County of Washington and State of Oregon, being more particularly described as follows: Commencing at a point on the North line of S.W. Durham Road as it exists on January 1, 1991, said point also being the most Southeasterly corner of Parcel I above; thence Northeasterly along the East line of said parcel to a point of intersection with the said East line of Parcel I with the West right of way line of S.W. Summerfield Drive as it exists on January 1, 1991; thence Southerly along said Westerly right of way line to its intersection with the aforementioned North line of S.W. Durham Road; thence Westerly along said North right of way line to the point of beginning. • Oregon Title Insurance Rating Organization(OTIRO) OTIRO No.P0-04 American Land Title Association FDOR0226.rdw ALTA Owner's Policy(6-17-2006) II ! — - .- y til !L. vi +,� .f - L,!• !......%.. 1 i, �5.._l. r �'�ti„• � -ti. i — :;l�•.:=t"!ZAI .01: Y= ;- 1:a. ,;,.r.a•;.• ,'`,..:..%.,t ";i'l?•J+.rK'' '• ""r•'t:-:".1.'S::'i. •c s --• -- -- 'qC•••.`r• t a o,ti.r i°`1•-.'-' ..1:._. ••. .• ,:'g{:•.•' , . .:'_:-' - --' - --..... ''•ry ••'^a 7•s'�,fi+'r'._'^�^.:"...w.' .�."'�?.: r.' `: .;: •�-�,i.pr e.x;i..• r.s.•ty'�p'ihC-ss'i:'!;4.1-i-^-..M1.,-; __..__ ..:j:;, 41;:ti.;A"4: •,Ir . •f•y�•::i' ci:. -:;Si a:•..-a4_-rR.• •au•ral... :...,s.t,:i::,. •.s:".:.Z•:. _ _ • + , .u • :l: .4 !,•-1L4.1.... ...-).,'....•-.F "•r :-rSt?•%.1: • LEI. �. „:rte—_ _.. :..1-i.:•,‘.-• .. ..- •- :,,. _ t. -,e... •,.1:;!:•• -.L�K:�7;"` __- __ — ' � •'.LS F : e i•w';'}'.f %f r y :.,;7 1', 1_t�. ••T.r.rt...Ar:'::.tt:.• .',t :.1•∎•)4;�•!'...nr9• :• .tiv,.•_• •S:i •;- ••r" y:•:. .;tite :fw. '!•....Er.a.'..••':4..... ,F+...;.,-: ' •',..,^ .. , .d,•Y, y ,.. ......• r.,..L. .. .3`':• e .S.ni•.� t'S Rt.:'t•••?•• .A'. 7-V:,,.t-:•. y{, r; +• 7.' ..:1�• .`i•,:''.l.Aw ,a•{ ..1 .•✓ 4 f..r. .. t {'..1. ..(•.L1: . . s:L..• -•_--.1"Y.oORT $.w f!f T `' Yn--..J ~T 1ry• - w�•r••.t.._Lw4a:."�i t j� :.J.`;Yw1• l'•wV.•f ra .,,.' +U+. - ..•;.•. ;C,. - i.e.. .r : ..i:;t.•'.—•' • .. •."•••r�. , 'n i..tel.• • ' :y t::• - fi.;X- •.*. . '. .iw:• .••.t.+.••t tit. L. .�.t I.s.' ... ... • ,''',.-.,;/24*,.'„;(.:'"*.:.7..'.; +..•. - t;.R«.•nib"r:i•.•-.- '4 S►- .!;.:1 Y::.=v,::. i SECTION 2 MAINTENANCE ANO RtPAIR; TAXES AND INSURANCE ----^�I 2.1 The cost of periodic maintenance and necessary repairs to the private roadway shall be borne by RFS as to the property described in attached :ad.. Exhibit "A-1" and as to the property described in attached Exhibit "0-1." All ___— such maintenance and repairs to the private roadway as to the property __— • _ described on Exhibit "A-1" and Exhibit "S-1" shall be performed by firs on a prompt, and diligent basis in accordance with the generally accepted street II .— and road maintenance standards then existing under the laws of City of Tigard, --- -- -- Oregon, Including but not limited to prompt patching or filling of damage to �4_ the pavement and resurfacing of such repairs and maintenance, all such maintenance and repairs to be performed as necessary. Required maintenance to --- - - be performed by RFS shall include the removal of snow, ice and debris as soon as practicable after their occurrence. RFS shall have no right of •--' reimbursement from Luton for the cost of such necessary maintenance and - - — —_; repairs. ,,,,,_ 1 2.I Subject to paragraph 2.4 below, if RFS fails to perform any such necessary maintenance and repairs as required herein, Luton, upon 30 days' --.--:_ = prior written notice to RFS, may cause such work to be done with a right of : t reimbursement for all sums necessarily and properly expended to remedy such �� failure. If RFS fails to pay such reimbursement within ten days of demand, O __ _,.?:.= the party causing such work to be done shall have the immediate right toy'y. , �� record a lien against the nonperforming party's property benefited by this �-- agreement. The parties agree that such lien shall bo foreclosed in the manner tl�. provided in Chapter 86 of the Oregon Revised Statutes for the foreclosure of '.'1 — _„r_ liens generally; provided, however, that any such lien shall be subordinate to .fix any first mortgage financing on the applicable property. - 2.3 If the roadway becomes impassable or ingress or egress is -- unreasonably i:,peded or curtailed because of RFS's failure to maintain the roadway as required herein, Luton may demand by written notice that remedial work be performed immedlately. If such work is not so performed Luton shall — have the rights of cure, reimbursement and lien as set forth In paragraph 2.2. 2.4 Each party shall pay when die all real property `axes, assessments or other charges against the land to which each party holds fee title end which Is part of the private roadway. There shall be no right of contribution from the other party for such Items. -- II 9•C Each party shall, upon execution of this casement agreement, provide -- evidence to the other party that public liability insurance with minimum — I —+.,.. combined lints of not less than $500.000.00 is in force at all times relating '� . ^+xx-ree to all activities, conditions, operations and usages on or about that portion i- '•;`;' of the private roadway which is respectively owned in fee title by each of the ;-_-s.'t..,_!': —. parties. Each party hereby lnd:mnlfies and holds harmless the other party _ w= from any liability arising out of the usage by third parties of that portion --igai of the private roadway owned in fee title by the indemnifying party. ----.J SECTION 3 CONDEMNATION; OEDICATION -- --- 3.1 In the event that the private roadway or any part thereof is taken by • 2 - RECIPROCAL EASEMENT AGREEMENT FOR ACCESS PURPOSES f n( �?� — -=r' z_ I1�- — _ , _ ac+eeao •a — • - -- °_ ._ - - _-- . . ..- r — _ _ - r. .1 '• s —•• • ••• • • Y • . • . r j. •r!K1 ••. e^4.-..•.c..:+y -Lr? a .'— . • { •2: . .. ?-.4 f, '.- --• ... • - :..ti.� ...,'.•';'�i...i. •.f:•PI..',I...!',I...! : -r•s-r-•s!:�-+•. •!.+i.1.e $•r'�. •. :a.r..•�•....■^•\. •ti ...A.....::;.4.". R^`.-.t•,•.•...", ..:•:••'...�'..:. =r^. .+= ii E - . YyL: it :-•- • • •:e. .a: ,•• 6 :. i p ms s! s e, ♦{•z,z y '3•�s+� ,f`;zy L♦ '/4w_ •f.tiff=----•--- - ... _ __ - !y.• 1 r r ti.... fit o T • { !�G'-.- ,.K 1-Y yr-,.4-i y YA r "i -- ---.._.__ y, ~ ' +i -'''''' ''''s;'''''''''-.`-'-:e.....1,': :h. i ! '•' !'•jhwo.'" • . a -- �• • i ....re .a•u..,+ nr-7 r.t{ i •:.. .. ', �..-. - 4Z, ,)., •• •-�_�+' i' %'' • ., • s�- -- 4t ' 1I• t -. .�:• •• {{s, ": •---"••''''',.‘P. < '''.; •t.•.:., ---- r . :„—x - — .1• -'--' --•_ , , • -'-3-•• a +•y+•^.—':44,4,a.y :t^ a4 4 :•' ' r•�..:: '-s` `__ _ -1.-...7...,/. t �,N i ^ Vi :ii, a. :aY . e1 _ f&. t. • 1 z ••xn,.p h•• J v t 1z• S.t k.s--�-� 'ydg ;o. :..t w• . - . • s . .; _ - .i ' • ' . ae w_w_- .. t Vii . i- , ,y•: Y . •'. , 1., •.1 1 ....Y.. S .• i .. • - .tZt' :�i ,Yil'''Y•^:�:' • _ •! ••.• • ,-__ .. ':n • w •- .te :. ♦; n = E{ • ------- Realty Financial Services Co., an Oregon corporation. _ZsH By '� cc...,•f+ !..11 /l:i..r.."e.'� . -_ —_ r Title ,} C• !n Cc.r ./.r•.•^".e- ___ —.1 STATE OF OREGON ) a' --- .... County of Multnomah ) '��"" On this day of Hay, 1985, before me appeared David R. Russell, to The r'•'=—_---- personally known, who being duly sworn did say that he 1s the Vice President of Realty Financial Services, Co., an Oregon corporation, and that the - foregoing instrument was signed on behalf of said Corporation by authority of .......; its Board of Directors, and acknowledged that said instrument is the free act,'j ..,••;' ---�-� and deed of said Corporation. ;,{ —— ' r•� -- - ....-. Notary Publ c for Oregon a Hy Commission expires: ,;-i5 ,17 .: W STATE OF OREGON ) • =-1 County of N';,..,&...,u- SS �Qg �- . �m on this day of May, 1985, before me personally appeared the above named Robert C. Luton, who acknowledged the foregoing instrument to be his ~:• voluntary act and deed. '{', • Notary Public for Oregon I My Commission expires: .;'•'1.A7 :' �.. • :q1:. I v.tiii • •`aieav ----- L - - .i - •• �I�.. •.h;4 — — 4 - RECIPROCAL EASEMENT AGREEMENT FOR ACCESS PURPOSES ' �_. J ..,yv. 054 UMW. __—.., - _••_.. a .. ... - ws:•. .. .... - .i•• '•° ,»s.p•orb- - t-M�,•, t j ." !vt sr te.aas�r rr� fw * 1.� t ti i�'y �"`a' R t .a $ S F .+ ^ - u ----";711- ==- ii 7-77777 •-"T�± . ..4k,7 °•`; •- n K�," f••.Y n aJt1y'1e y.'r�"'"t~i A..•�•..'ti!� ''"...!to",°' _ _. _ - , •.•c A 7 r -t $ �' +.''at�,•:•-t .i::..r. ,rte •:••,:j.: .•'r:;. ,. •---- "'"""• a ....._ �•4 w;r k r"i' -�,-`_,.' j.-•-iy..r—;t, .:�:�' r^r� +s•;%f •.•s:4:..•.r•••:��• — •* - t:.'• ;R.t,s�.:}.y;..�i.�,s`',jt��•L'..:.L.i'..•.•��t{{,���,.. •ors r:".e'.•�s-e.. �•� -rte%':.•.1 • �. r,.�:.L.--2s•ti•.]t+-� ;iT-- '="4_•vt. t r°l t""��� .::'r r. • • —gym — "�� EXHIBIT A r-- '- LEGAL DESCRIPTION • That portion of Lots 16 and 17, WILLOW-BROOK-FARM, Washington County, Oregon, described as follows: ""' Ccginntng at a point on the north line of that tract described in i•+� V ] Deed Book 849, Page 19, Washington County Deed Records, with is also _- _ south line of that tract conveyed to David Spath, et at, by deed , recorded in Book 344, Page 651, Washington County Deed Records, and �aaz - °r which beginning point Is North 627.99 Feet and East, 179.49 feet from ti,e quarter corner of the south line of Section 10, Township 2 South, -- Range 1 West, Willamette Neridian; thence along the westerly line of the tract conveyed to Roderick Enterprises, Inc,., by instrument recorded as Recorder's Fees No. 51037174, Washington County bead °� EaiF . Records, South On' 19' 16' East, 165.00 feet; thence North 89' 40' 14' East, 165.00 fest; thence North 89' 40' 44' east, 95.00 feet; thence South 00' 19' 16' East, 80.00 feet; thence South 60' 46' 57' East, 84.67 feet; thence South 21. 13' 03' West, 104.00; thence South I 68° 46' 57' East, 52.00 feet; thence South 26' 39' 32' West, 39.47 •_ feet to the northerly line of Southwest Sumnerfield Drive, and the o most Southerly southwesterly corner of said Roderick Enterprises , —•.- tract; thence along the northerly line of Southwest Summerfield Drive along the arc of a 130.00 foot radius curve, having a central angle of 79. 35' 12' the chord of which bears South 76. 51' 56' West, � - 166.41 feet the arc distance of 180.58 feet being to the right of the chord to the most easterly northeast corner of that tract conveyed.to Prestige Properties, Inc., by deed recorded as Recorder's Fee No. 82001633, Washth?ton County Deed Records; thence along the northerly and westerly lines of said Prestige Properties tract North 52. 55' 40° West, 23.76 feet; thence South 89' 52' 07' West, 111.19 feet; thence South 00. 07' 53' East, 77.44 feet; thence South 20. 24' 46' West, 59.06 feet to the arc on the northerly line of Southwest Durham -• Road; thence along the arc of a 432.46 foot radius curve right having a central angle of 17' 13' 34' the chord of which bears North 78' 12' ---. 01' West, 179.53 feet, an arc distance of 130.02 feet; thence North _ 69' 35' 14° West, 164.93; thence North 24' 35' 14• West, 28.28 feet to the easterly line of Southwest Pacific Highway; thence along said -"--1 easterly line North 2(1' 24' 46' East, 502,55 feet to the north line described in Deed Book 849, Page 19, Washington County Deed Records; _^ thence Worth 89. 40 44' East, 262.05 f•ot to the paint of beginning. 3'ewoT, S _______ _______ . . - - • _y ._�-�•es 1 I• �./'!fi, 9,... •.:L�--. ?:'—..-iL4-2..• -.._'1.Y.�•rc'. 1.1.�— �_--_ • • r,.::i:- '-?a '. L1 'i',i.iX-ed�S�"�,,:s..rdz7'.•..-::.,.,:,::; "4 r• a c-'''t:s•�-i•+•{' - .i..!•,' r.,u.._e`i..rwi'.- • +i �s.•e2t ry,•�..�':i t�;b� - _ :7'Y'/i,.•.i�i ��' !�.C. X'!4k- i•,,"1s-f.' i.• •�-fi t.,,r+t�r,�� r�'+r�.. .� 5 :; •.. " -- ....- :•„ry7.. Y s'r'. "s S:�T.�''•' L ' , �I..:s.r� :.+;: `r'.. �C '�i•''�•t7' 7�'�.i .i r~:!�.•'_ — .•va -w•if--- '•r•,•r ••-'1: .ry[Li'�:V'•_'S.'-?.-••T:-,••a9.^,u.•- . •:. •• '. t• .N.t'• �•.t� ;•j.� _ -•yii • 2.,! -_tip: :� �Iy.•��,•• ti .�"•.- ~J'•':.i• ' i .. • •._. `�1'Lta t!►•,v�:w•x.r+%tM>'r•f i•'i.4+•;�..p..•�"•S'i.� v sr,..•, -�il ':% .:�.Vii:�. •.,i ., .. --- .:'r,�f�'� :i. 1•`J4l1'1,, r:..-rtr.e,,i,..+r.�;.f :y ar•' �«•y.'SkL::,:si• • _ tt •}.y'• •t'���.:�•..r. "'• " �!` 71w• •1 1:' .,,,r *•f.'� �•s+i+�i-..r., -fix:. .t;/ it T:;} :r''•t:"i�."' '.�,„• 1 ,?`•. —--- '` ._.r•. . 9G- •r •• , ..• . et:}•t..e v?«•, t+h.•.A . �..e.�'f•r• '•y• � - ....• 41:9/65 EXHIBIT Al- • LEGAL DESCRIPTION _ An Easement for Ingress and Egress • FROM; Surrnerfield Conrnercial Center ainiarer- T0: Prestige Properties Inc., (Robert C. Luton) • The following described tract of land being a portion of Lot 17 H1llo.rbrook _ — - °— Farm, in the southeast 1/4 of Section 10 T-25 R-1W N.M. City of Tigard, • Washington County,Oregon: .uw 8er/inning at the northwest corner described in deed to Prestige Properties Inc. recorded on Janc�ry 21, 1982 as Recording Fee No. 82-001633; thence N-00°07' it• _— 53"-N 12.50 feet; thence parallel with the north line of said deed N-89°52' ;yam t, _— 1 rl — — 07"-E 115.39 feet; thence S-52°55'40"-E 28.57 feet to the westerly right-of-way 1 a-•.Oo —� line of S. H. Sun;nerfield Drive; thence along the arc of a 130.00 foot radius ”'o �++w+r • curve having a central angle of 05°31'04" (the chord of which bears 5-39°49' 56"-N 12.52 feet) the arc distance of 12.52 feet being to the right of the chord, ... _� _ to the northeast corner of lost said deed; thence 11-52'55'40"-W 23.76 feet; thence S-89°52'07"-W 111.19 feet to the Point of Beginning. t Containing 1,742 sq. ft.. (see attached sketch) E:ri101r 1 • _• —.. —_-. - ... .._.-..--.-..•:„. .. _....... ...,,,...„....,___-_-_- :, . ..-.,,,,, -------- - _ -,.....................,...r.-. ... -----''-'"' -- - . -"7-,_;"4a5iiiiiiimeee „ ....77:-.7-7 r•-:'-.7.7.777%•..••,4...'"-.....-;77•-• -,--.-'Z.,.••....8.0.'7-•. . ---.._.. — —•••-••• ."Or:...............•...,.',...-;,...-::...1..•••;•••:.r.".:<::..1....*•;-1, . ...--- -•;.- - •••.-• .-r...• • -. • • ......._ --------- . e . _ • -------- : _..--- -------::----,°.-.--•-, .1....... - -:4--.'• -:.;---:- •:;:-.. ,::••---n-,-..:'..,'..."'-7,- c''-.-...-....L.1,';''-'....,i'-'-"''''•'-'. 4--';''4.;'''' • •-•-•-rr-:• •,'. ,-,- ._ . : ...,::;,e•14., :•'il.,,,.........-,:i.....:.,..vr.i...,„:•...:;.:..:,.:...:•::•;•,-...--:.::-..i::.....,1.--..*:---i.o.'----:i..--,-•:-..•:,'•:,..,---::,--;;-.;-'•:.-::•., .',. ...........-:,...,...;-:...'.....':• ' --- •-''''''''.... '''''''..."' .- .''.4----:---.2-:' ' ' ...,_-t.!--/,--,,-,--,Vi:.-;::14:istd.t..1:4.--•.-0...•,: - .. :...,.....:7,-..k,,:•?-1--,--:,:'-',,::•":•.:,,:.---:-:',- --.:-4. ,:....-,.-:-'--•',..,..,-.......•••••••-:-.--":r_.,-;':::,-:',-'•-:?',,r•r:4-7,"..‘,.•'-.'fr.- _ ''-:.7-7...*"''••",;/...f.t-'4.4.-'-.:...---....-.-:- •it.7:-...........-: ,,'1,,-....:.e.!..:...;!.... ,-.•4-,'"7:':::.*•:...:....•.".•:.•'n';',-.'...7-.',,.;'.."'`..;..k•".7 "'"'''"•---- _,,,...=,, ...:.;;;IV.L.,.4•:•./....-..t.:•.;..-'.4,...;',,,•;.W,,:i::•--- -f.7::.!. ,:-.....C...7.7r:h:,:';'•...•'•.:'.%:-....`..:-.:•.....::;.:;.•,';;;;F.:;.":;:::%'.:..:....• — --_.: __. ... . ....„,...-.--..--4.-,......--..---,,•i,....t.t.-....r.,.,t.:4.t-..--.1:,......t....""'.-......-•::::::cv-.- r.e:;•.i:::::-;=.:.::......".'....... .....:'..-.:•■.•.f„::..i.'...v.: '.."......,:'.%)...,...:,.f.•...".,.... ,-.,,,„• -u,•' ,....".. -, :,..t.• .. ......-:, - <,:;.'....i..*:-.4::...;,••'',.'.. ' .:;••-•■I.'1, ''''•:-.''.'. ..•••••:_.'• .,',.• •••••.74.'',.:..**::1.'...' -•• •:.•:VIr••• :, •.' .. ' ': ..:“...i,.......:..•. .;...:,.. ,.....1.•:' .1.:::4'"•.:....?••••••••'',.•,•••: ......,..I.....•t...,• •... , _.q.•.. •••,••.. •.■:.r..-",:.....; , ..' .......••••••••••••••••-•••••• . Z...4ri ••••,.... ::•••,.. ...• .........i,4=...4..*...1...,,4...•.." r id.;V.". t:q•.. .. .•rtr,,,r7'rn .4.• ".71......!...i.•Jr'.!,•i 4'f‘f:.. — ...... ..e....p!.....*:.r.,:. -.;:;:.-„,.;‘.1,..71.'.,'.':.:;.'...V.:;:d'i t.t.:57!.!:';'•:':-'.4.:'•';'..'• ,•,.%.7.::".■;11:.''."'••••:".••''/..'.1;•: . ":.-- rtqi".1c's••T•i'.$" .. .J.•-•—•:-...."::'::,-. •.:•:,.... ..f:%%,..".....•,'.....'-';;,.;•;:-7 ,4-.........-';',....1"...;';:v•-. •.i.h.-.:,:s:.••...'• , •.''.1_,•.,,,t:,1.7!•,-*,'•-•••• ..:4...,:,.".,,,........,:_ ..... I "/:.:. • .* • ....Tr... -...=-__.• =-,--._.-.! EXHIBIT A-1 .- , I -, , -------- . ._._ - 'Ir• , . __. _ vl, . t,-,---.-'''r• e■ !I RakeSAMINISSOMIC- ______ pf■akaascram.........- bl;IN I/ V...1. ' 3,,nalszosug91 ;sr- ;jr, 4"'r" A Q; ....-:,-••••7.;.-:.-;-"•.,:;.ii. ' V% • °' • -04.' 10 S', . .. .' / • 4 • 49.,,eo ' 9 • • • ,1792101111S: 'S.I.la .S1. 4 4,4 -----.- ==.2....-.-cr , _ 4,- kg2 ii / ____ - ,.oL----,Zir— • , .3 41 / ...___. ____ •&,•,,, tit ,E ir, ______, ••••/. 4._ t. ... v: -----_. .11:"9 ,,.., -......... v.d. • - 1-. .........___ 1,N. ,•■ ___. • .-...._ . r, .2.' %, I • e e sit • • - ' - ... •:.,11, . , • N ii•'''.;-0 wowneismor- ...., i ••,_, •••••- •• . _ 17 ri 0,, 4'0- ;,-.... ,.. ,..., ."*.•b'.. .,,,,.•,,-- =....e.:::.„.......- 24 • ;,.v■Ii.e •,,i. ........_„_.. ____..._ .0.0 ,e.t., par -•.--„, ill Q . ',..?",g: .,...---. . .... i s. • ... zA. y Ari ,,, • . —,.•• .... .____......: ,4, t _____ • M0.....00—' ._ .... • • .0„ _ 01 is. .., ._=.-. -_ --...._ -.-- . . •..,.;:lt,..,,,, 1": 'jig ... ...........f21 1•4. '.5. 1.%, Ibr= 4 • I .7 t. ° 2= ••• . ..;•5,t‘ . . i'v 1 kce „tn u c- • N,N !... t7'4.. t I k " k • • . ..---•••=....... ,.... • . -c•-...3 • to ei..4 • ...=: P =rig 1 Pli 'r•85 •.=_:I_"' • tv/...yrtrzi .. '_,,,e, ..— .Illi•/ * i Si ■ ;.;--..--a--z:.7"_-.--.4 7,.1.,..7r--.......-;;a--.. • -1 .----.. -. 9111 _ --•--- ---- ----•• . . .. . .. -...., . --7---a7r.“--L1--7---- _._ HARRIS-MCI‘PONAGLE ASSOCIATES • •NOINItr.....1111/71.1(0141 •I I . ... DOOD NW.00 11:14X/1CLAL/21,11t1171. WO A D.on ma ON 071A9b • - ---- ...7.7-.L.....-- . • •.. ------- - •r"'Vr..."•••••*r,,■.........., '"'. ..-'''''""""'""' -- ,..Ze-:.---...a.......--................n....,,-.-......,----.•-,..---1.-cr... .......1.. ....-.. ---........--7,..,..•..............-...--,,,..... .==.-........ ,,.....„*.,..„,,,,.„,.....,...., - ---......-.-....-.."-.. .,-,,,,...---...- —MO. --.."-- -=0,-.:-aasavernemerasanw vs.•iuwee, ...■;;Zetem.”%aurep.asews.---- —.,,..............—"-..-...........a..,_ . .............. _... . .- ......---... ,-..---- .- • --,---. ---.------• —-___—___=, s -— • •�;•+•^:•ice:'.. '�. -. �.�. ..;:: ..�.:". T.'-�'' . a•.,,'. tT, i.i ••i.ti '7° a 7,•1' .$iv,i••+.,i.• •r J5:=: %1L ••.-.4e;'•;::..u... ,.4 :1 . •-•-s ---- •: i;'3• y`1 •ry . . t ,1 .Ti"'Pt ": ° ...i. ;.-t_ _— •, Yr.•, ti:- •y' °�y''• t •,',r.'?;i .11:•i!"..:'.:i»;t+l{:.:;�.�..�.:ti_1:;. — _ •f: • h p..�r: :-�ly�.•, ■' r t.• i ai•' .,f f' y�•'' so•,:•,.':'•Y• ',%"=�.yia:R1'v •i- '.r!:;: r:o.:•- _.•..{•=yf t :• •• :•:=t: y• ,� ..:....ii:,..3�.a:yr-trs. •'•.'.!•',•.- •!'i.:.••,y..i : •e f+';.r•>_ • :47.ti,'= `•.r.1.•-''i.14.... ';r. '•;.,..;:=•1,.. •- 4::•.•- `};.•vowa ,•1ik.� � • - -• -- ,'+i't' `'1.^ti: :j'�{:: . y..z .._;,`11 yy S' ••••". 6t �(' �'^`- ...-... ...» — ."'-+... -✓A..s:..ri ••i• rn''�+i�,.-: "7:7!..��,r.::. if. ,e-,:a. ...".4":-.4?;;;".9 ., _»..-. • EXHIBIT B -- Order No. W 29952 -- _ fm . — DESCRIPTIC<4 A portion of Lot 17, WILW.4BROOK PAM, Washington County, Oregon, being nose particularly describer] as follows: Commencing at a point on the north line of that tract &scribed in __.� Does Sods 849, Page 19, Washington County Retards locatri North 627.99 feet and East 179.49 feet from the quarter corner an the south line of Section 10, Township 2 South, Range I West, ::illamette Meridian; thence South 00° 19' 16" East, 165.00 feet; thence North 89° 40' 44" East, 95.00 feet; thence South 00° 19' 15" East, 80.00 --- feet; thence South 68° 46' 57" East, 04.67 feet; theme south 21" 13' 03" West, 104.00 feet; thence South 68° 46' 57" East, 52.00 1� 1 _ feet; thence South 26° 39' 32" West, 39.47 feet to the northerly 1 --- line of S.W. Sumererfield Drive; thence along the arc of S.W. Smmierfield ' ....,.- ^.I Drive on a radius curve, 130.00 feet, having a central angle of 79° • �y - --•. 35' 12", the d;ord of ■hich bears South 7G° 51' 56" West, 166.41 c' o _ feet the arc distance of 180.58 feet being to the right of the :,. + ===_ chord; sad point being an angle point in that tract conveyed to .'iOo —- _ Sunday Consumer, The., by deed recorded July 10, 1979 in Fee Numxer ..t• "-'®ea-• _-•-•_- 79026990, Washington County Records, and the true point of beginning .t."" m of the tract to to described; thence along said Sunday Co.-Lerner . '"� Tract, North 5:° 55' 40" West 23.76 feet; thence South 89° 52' 07" _•.. WEet, 111.19 feet; thence South 00° 07' 53" East, 77.44 feet; ---- thence South 20° 24' 46" West, 59.08 feet to the arc on the northerly _• line of S.W. D Them Road; thence East alone the northerly lint• of = S.W. Durham Road to the east line of that tact of land conveyed to _ Tualatin Der31opi.u:.:Co., Inc., ty deed recorded March 20, 1963, in ---'_ Sods 686, Page 143, Records of Washington County; thence North __ _ along the east line of said Tualatin Develcpent Co. tract to a point on the west line of S.W. Surnerfield Drive; thence North along the west line of said S.W. Surenerfield Drive to the poiift of •— beginning. - y .-.41' EKHRIIT 8 ---- 6AFEC0 yq = •- -----r___ fey.. .�.-._,... ;.---. �.: .. 1 —.. �,:-�.e.•.��-_...ice--__•-_ --� _- -_ -._—_ ._--.�- •�..':: "'.LNj a.. r•.'t•."..\i 7.: .ti ��• _ .:' • 5� L..1 YJ 7 I. -.-_.-_._ _^ , s•{•: •>' ° .:r� ,J,•:,:�t�C s.' ••2'•. ',-'q .7 dT`r„�'." 1, a^'..l��S� .n•• ------- - ... . .-�iiw.F.; � i�1� .ajar:�r5°. .•f; rr:;l •... •b.� «>'•y.'�^•t�:''•'•� �'•e' tr.,:.t! .- _� .•• • a. .•�...:_•._r.•. _..___.. �.: s.. ^.=: 4:+. •7�W. w : .,•_.. •L•S ..i-_:•. : • r ••••! 4•••••:'..;.•• •K: r•t• :.r. i� t . ' • .i •• _ f -6.• t•is:•∎,••;. r ` • y%, �a-::;3 • •, °t:'f1r•4 t At 2: -to; � .ti. •" it:. t 1. r i s•s,e hNFAf .4•••••:. 0 . • t a�:{ ; yy'• qq --•••••_ . IV• .. -• - ° �.. 4/19/BE '_ E%HBIT B-1 11111:111611.`S LEGAL DESCRIPTION An Easement for Ingress end Egress -'- FROM: Prestige Properties Inc.. (Robert C. Luton) TO: Sunmerfleld Commercial Center —_ = .The following descibed tract of land being a portion of lot 17 Willowbrook Form, in the southeast 1/4 of Section 10 T-25 R-1W W.M. City of Tigard, Washington County. Oregon: Beginning at the northwest corner described in deed to Prestige Properties Inc. recorded on January 21. 1982 as Recording Fee No. 82 001633: thence along the --L north line of said deed. N-09°52'07"-E 111.19 feet; thence S-52°55'40"-E 23.76 JV`) •Ir'.' w�. •-_ ,•t-- / feet to the westerly right-of-way line of S. W. Surreerfield Drive; thence along :` -^ - the arc of a 130.00 foot radius .:urve having a central angle of 05°31'04" (the chord of which bears S-34°18'45"-W 12.52 feet) the arc distance of 12.52 feet : ti•� — being to the right of the chord; thence H-52'55'40"-W 20.15 feet; thence S-89° 52'07"-W 706.98 feet to the west line of last said deed; thence K-0U°07'53"-W 12.50 fat to tin: Point of Begin: Containlr.g 1.637 :G. Tt., (see attached sketch) _„ - v • • — M -- EXHIBIT B•1 — —_=:_--- ---- --_ --=—<_ _.°ca��.�.. - -tip._ - ..._ ._. :ate.:....,.• ------ _- ....•-.-- -- ,a..v�n•--, • .y.`•y. - i•c�.wo�n..�.,�s°°anec�- w--- -- .------ tea'— -- .-.....•• -- --— - .-L.....-...--==..-.... - -- - -— -- --"----"--- ----,-—_—__ _v._____•_____. 7 _•__-.. --...„--•-•-_________________ ------ -----===='''-'..'''"-.'".•'''•'''''...".-•-r '''.."..-- "''''';"' "-..'-...'••••• •••••=••- •.'••••••••••,. ..r.•••••••••.--",...... ................--..... ..-.........■. •-•-•. .... -- ,..or --••••---....--____ ,-.......--- •70.11M1107..U.reEMS.-±,...n.. . ,.... '",...".'--,42P8..... --'''''''---=- a '''..-- ....:-.....^. =-----.---'-. ."--7....-••=-%•-.. ..-7-1- ----':. ....rig■illasiiii2■11011111. '' "'--•"•."'"".....'''''...,.. .:':•:•''',...,•"••••••'•"•••,K... .x.'.;• --;!--7. •:!:.4i7.r,•,-.-Yti.77-7.-.--•- ... _. . _ -.*.......,..•••-••••t-,-;•-: ...--t-... -......••:::•:..4:■,..0..,.. ..4•,....,,,L..•••• ...., p.....t...•••, •:.,,.;:.....,.....' • ......,.......... . .. ... ..'... V-- .'' • ,...• '• r ': .. '••.4. ••••••-..,=..:• - .7...7...4.,.%.....0, .t 4....,V.• .....•,.. • :. ............r.;7.1. 4......! r'....""''4.‘• • .'•..•"1... .......-..'.,...,..::;.....,,,. .,,,,-,•■•,(...f........1,'ir,;.•'..'• W.. ir•:•••:::7-=------' ''. .-- ,....'....•-41r.C.C4'7*••:*"...37.(...M1.!`i i......44Y'....:.. %."‘:,.777.77f17.:t.... ..7;•:kt :-, ,•.•.: -_;,•••:•••••••• • .. _. . .... ..... i . .. ----7•75•••• • -•.--..L.:,,,s,........r..•,.. ....1. ......... ; ••,..'......•:•_. :;of.:.1....• . .•...•v.-... .•.-..,-.. t p s .;., ......,s,..,:,..... •..,--: . •-•••-....L. •..:: ,;.- ..:.:. .;.7 .*:,,,.. .,; •• • ..• . .....,4•, n..: ..:•*., -...g.'",..,..„-t,: 4.:.....-.0;.: .....•:„..,,..:.:,t., --_-_.-•• — .......... 16.'.......••. ..•, -0,„• -4•,-.7.17t.:.:....-5.. 1..............,e.."."......tyr.•?...:;,...,r:e..../..k.I';.. , '.:C.•••••.;•••7?..:??....%.;.; ...•"' •,..',':•slitr...• '.. -•!:• , 7.'...",.;i..t‘' ..X,1147:V141*.s.•.*•:......•%*:••-•. :" ,- i•__- • . •..•7ner.rol.• *..:-•••; 1--r:, ...-.•-sl'--"Viv!•••••••4•Ir ...-•:-•••••16••••••v•t4'.•-sesr J iv,...,.; ••1... -• .• •=••'''''''• .1/4 "`•zt ..? . •: N-•..4 - ----,-......--,- --..e...r.-c-srie•-..4tv..1.-P...t.TitY.r4-,..,.-•-.,;.,.-.••,!.. .t. -•--Itai: ...4;•..e...gtirl4Nt.t-'14-•-;•••=,,-:.::1 4::iy•-•••..r..y...,•:.;_tl..',...‘11,,••:-..•••••• .•,.••••.r.••.:J..?,r-r-ts..--... •-•;•,:e .. ;P.,...4.1.:•.1,4•0 ...-1•••'•'lit -•-:•".' ;:::•-*!...:•1••no".:....,•177 •• . .. ....' `7:7.1 •••'L.;.:-.:-. n .. :.-.•v7e,...:..............i..,:74..4-Al*PAr.z.L. v17•44.i.".:•'1.......':";;:rtr:A-•il.•--:':-- :•.:"''+;'......-;:-1..." .'-':*".•%••"*7-' ::-:,.. t.:••'1.: -.- ____ _.... • .--. .., •••:...r,•sp.., • s . A•r. •I ......, ' 0.•••••61, • :, ,v.,...... ....,.e .. .,....,.... . ..1. . „....1., .-.......----.1 ...---.......--..--,.....• •. - • ...-. • ' EXHIBIT 8- 1 1-___--- -- . ..f. • _________ * • _ .-- ......... ..1 ,..1. • g■ '%, • 4.'/4-*'•:45' !g ............... -,... C, s # 1.7•.■,_••••_-,•_ .".:7-. ‘• . ----,,,4 .--__ .4Y,s114. . 1. • .? .• ::* .•-41. 4" .. 0. ................,..,-,---• --,.. •a 5, %N , -_ 4. .i . .... • ........... .„--___ . . 4. ....; ••{1 k . I • —. St 3% • =•____— -__-_-_,.. ..•.; •=1. ,'ts 1 . ... . .-.....__.-.... -,-- -.• 'it ,B 44 Z •••-.. • 4 : .1 ll t., ":.••0 __ —,...,._-. Sir 1 „.• , _ -. - . ... ._.......-- ••-•! .-."..••■••• 11(II 7•191.- ..- — .L.. _.,...m c. ,,:: 1.o. . i..... • .. . . - ....4.. • ,N li•• _ •141, al . • ,. , „4 ....r„..... 114 0 •.:• •-- ,____, ._. 4745' .. iv . . -- 1... • 7 ti '%"'''•-....___* ................., •.../ /1 4 '•• PINNEL±,-. --1 - 2i• .0.le •....„...... ... V ' -• __ _ . a 1.-siz., i .---.. i ' - kk... .., , . . „J..? - .• i:$ --- jes ..c, • • 11 4 k • -Fee-., - ■41 ; 1%1-: 7).ft N" • VEN-• I t i 4z r,.. .4 k • -•,wszer.,...."' •_"'-- . • . X • . .) 7. 4;;V • pk,,,,,. • . As•A.i..7.=- ---=: / a„la,L 9:o 0.5,— 45:7 14.2)* .:.11 I .. iyi,,,, .... _ w , 7 tip.,4 i •Pei- I 'If •,..4'S —- _ --- ,1 "•'•'•Z s••• .:, • -, ••••• _-.....,,--- -.- Ilir • il . .."' -••-•”...,....---.5.---... ; . .---. ---. . •.... . . •——,.._ -''''- • • li ArtFlai•Dera.i0NAGLE ASSOCIATES .... ......___ -.= sm.,.ifil•..01.,111•DPill • .' -•.'-"-•- .fr"..77:-% loop am 00MAILITCIAL ernmErr — /0 =GARD,0111:00:4 Dun .. ....=----.....7...7...-..;:.- • - 7.' ---a- .-S----- ..-;.--- --.:-.Z.e.-,./—"---•--.------.---.---'-'-'''- .. - - • .---....gpuar* •■•■••■••■• •• •-••=..-1-••-r-- ---------•••--=.---:-=.••••• -,,,..•:.,!_54,...•;•,..., _,...,,,A' _se.;.••40.••••••e..•1...2._,1:14.4k.,..,44. 7,:i.41...4k;•!..:;_.0,ii.,,.. ••• 1,....`,.... ",....4.4:4....#,!.: ---.. •. .., .:?"-!' • .....;,., "re"1•••••■•;•••07‘...'177411".•Th....":V.?..•k t.o.tinco....11,grEh..?■.-.•.••••.,•••..:• .•.:::. ....•.••■:•••••, :.,,,, -. _-- ___.______---____-- -- --— ••••_•• ••y._-4iati .-. ..V. _.--•,- -- _____—____.... . . — .• • — — - . ... . . • - • - ••••- • _ I -•••••- •• "•••••••"" ' •"Ile tc.•••• •-••• / 1 41er'• :••••:•••••!:•••• ' • i•,•• ••••4t,'•••••••••••••• •• h•••••••• •;1`7••••••••..:•..•••••:••••••••:- . •••••,... •.••• 1...•.. ••• •-V•1..•••••••• "•■ •••o• • 4 •-• •••• •'e ••••S 'n.1-"1,•••'••••••.: '•• -••••7 -••• %•• •- • • • •••• ••t ••,•••,•orrg.s:.'i •• . :••• .••: • II •• •••_•••• •••• —• —• 2,4..1;• •••:s•7:ty,;.• ••-•• • := ••,! 1•.: ,••••7 . _ - . • • •••••7'••,4 •-t•:••t •••.....1.17.•••,,••-•■ . • •;•• .•• • : • •t••••••• ..:7••••■••,••••• 0_ •eres..A1••••■ ' •••• • • .• •--.•••' vet•t•-•sefr ' -• ••:•••• i.r4;•.%.1.11,'••••2•:•••••407.:'.11,t V A 1.'• ••:;•"*..a.....i,h::',rnt*•:... t•••• • • • 'aih; ••••••••• •.•.•14.• ••sts..“:,/•,• . ,:•••• 1,•-.1.•••.• .44 ■• ••••■•••••• •"" •••• ••5• Ir.• ••••••":,A.ON,•;U:.••• .4 as:: r• ••• 71- • ..s.• • - _ • •••"• ..1,4. i•7•3r. r.f,t7;•.• • . 4...• A•A .•••o•• •! ••• • • •.• • •" • •••• •. . • I ••••••••••••44...A....% Art, . •• •.4a...ft.. TA: 0.•••:.•?!.**•,•.:•-•::•?eV,: •"•.■.:1..."!.• . 1211,01111:17.,' •••■•••4111111111IMP --- —••-..••••••••■ TE MC: - ••••••wermill • 13121 _. STATE OF OREGON _ SS — County of WaohIngion } I.Don:WSW.MOSOn.01/0c1Of or Asso3sment — -•••••• and laaan and Er•Otncla Roeostslor at Con• yoyancos tot said county.do hobby cnndy'het _.....—.. the Minh Inslr.neonl Of writing wx.secolood • "• and toCordod In hook ol recodo of sold county, --- Donald W Mikan,Dlioolos of Azdassmont and 7airdion. Er• •••Oyail Offle.10 County Clock •-• - —• -• • • 1985 r,AY 30 - .• •••■•42.1e • noormomm ••••• .--j I ••—••••••■■■■• "•••I • -••■••••■••••■••••••• •—.1 •t•LiaP- ••■•••■:j11 • ...--ce•-so-•-••••menearkny.w.-------- ---...mosokrarkkoorok.,k1SAMOISAWCIAit --••••••••••••••• •••■•.••••• J "iaa-n.''kei,.', ',�∎ ' ;:" ,54-• :.;+]��' i�,".�.�*. e=_ 7 P*'',J+=.3L;;'!s''1'.•'-' .�1:i 41.-b P.' 1-1T ;72t. p�,..r :yam z, '' "''t ` 'A,G�•f, °:g13.-,it'�'�,1 , ,k &rq 4 '7 'q,1+45.ft.r,'a.' 5�. t , rZ,. ii i' ••; ,f.+ ,,1;.,w�"� , -^�, _ �,ry $i • �r+t� -•�3� �,•s�.: 3 a l' �a.,-' .. ,5� sAYr,. 7� �,rc.r.et �,°' �r �____ r,.rcccc*ctc iS�',r , + '4 fir;`;•r' :. , lit P r rte " n 1 bE q4".$. f{rtj'. i 1w ..' —1 , '�1 L4 •,f .•"t .i1 y(..•. , o„•,,•Z(n`, ••M ( L CY, <,;:. �i' • ! Pro oct1 � - -' S•so'•° 4.r: i?S� ' r-.. 7 5,,.,..•c,, d Lomrsrciel L _wc�'., :_s _ Jea>- .. • c:- .,. Easoment i Son. sewer Retirement Ctr, 4' ,,wt•3,, .K,!x `> :Y,; Dood Reference t79046729 ,„�' t. ,. 4, ;„ 1 X'.a• KNOW ALL MEt1 kl? THESE PRE5ENT61 That we A x Tualatin Development Co., Inc. ,.iP-' .,� ir' f: •S•y�. t y. yl''e7'a r rTat '. 0:4 0: 'V End Roderick Enterprises, Inc., a Joint Venture and Sunday Consumer, Inc. arid Tualatin • rW ``}'�{1T.,9•f20L.•Y it r i 'N'1ti 'a`21wr Development Co., Inc. °i _.9't-r-'f'1ie ,.". . 1.”- y A.,-3 1 , f°-• ,. •ar`yell: ?,r .t hereinafter termed grantor(a), in consideration of the sum of $ 00.00 'i, I 'xr•*•tf .' ., l " to be paid by CITY OF TIGARD, a municipal corporation of Oregon,hereinafter � w, zt"t+ - - -:4 . termed the City, hereby grant, bargain, sell and convey unto the CITY OF 9 4 ' ,,,.•t TIGARD a perpetual right-of-way and oasemont as hereinafter described, to- < �• x2 gather with a temporary right-of-way and easement to nee an additional ores 4,•y ' 'S''A,• ` hereinafter described and designated temporary eaoemont, for the following w,,N�o i ' 'F uaea and purposes: `t,-°.° + g a" .y.•ff �' . � 1. Perpetual easements r>•����lc�t ' ' I An unencumbered perpetual right-of-way and easement for th© . y .^ purpose of constructing, reconstructing, operating, maintaining, t '•• s• a 1,•' ''..'-'•` . • inspecting and repairing of an underground newer line and (, : + � , j' ''`' { appurtenances, together with the right. to remove, as necoesaryr ,.,,•.,,.,,_ E{. Yr+.i`.'. ,. 4i.', .1 vegetation, foliage, trees and other obstructions within the 4;'..` .ri ., ..6.iy'�' pL.taut:' • easement area, but reserving to the grantors the title to the '..y1,r;...;:•`f �h ,,n{ L ' a; •`I: lands, subject to the easement, and the right to make ouch use •�;,jjr41s:' °� r r thereof, except to construct buildings, 1 i•'� Qc `► t.a v;i1., as will not interfere with the uses and purposes of the easemont7 i - '�,V,}„- -u; ;�� / said easement area being 7.5 feat on each aide, when measured �. ••^,•..;?;.,0�?q=1"'ij' '.1�= at right angles, of the following described center lino within the r cFr{ ir'^ 'e_;..,, following designated premises: _ __ .— : 14,F'5411 j W .. :w.' tills' '' �". P ;•G+��i. $rE ` :v. 10gT-25nR-111 W,pM.nWashingtonNCounty,0Oregon2andoN-00°01'53-W South 29.60' fres the 1/4 Section '.,. w; S; %.,. A'S ' '�; "' corner on the South line of said Section 10 being the "True Point of Beginning" s- o y. ik 9. .••,•r,"j „tr of a 15.00 foot wide easement 7.50 feet an each side of the following described , : .tl✓w 'E;1c4 .ts) 6 ;.4.1.1.i.-:•1 centerline; thence: N-32°12'39"-W 204.56', thence.S-86°21'21"-W 396.45'; thence: •`) N-69°35'14"-W 75.39'• thence: N-20°24'46"-E 294,00'; thence: N-69°35'14"-H 09.00' _ ,. µ. • . ..:'f to the East line of S, W. Pacific Hwy. to the terminus. -'• s;.i •'w. 1 '•- It being understood that the side lines shall lengthen or shorten to intersect. is.',.' `r: ".w' 1, r.' '..q_.:1:: i',.i: . ri 2. Temporary easement: r ,•4:..,,,,:-4 ,. •••i?..;tit, ; _, ”"sa t-' C;� Together with the temporary right of ingxeos, egress and regress, s':; -• ,�'�.;'.i,,1 ,r,,,. • r;4°-;. l": 5:` and use for sewer construction puspooes, of additional lands .,•.3.n7{.-6-- t...r.7 ..::2.; .-...A., • af,.`i, ,:plaig• ra'sxiYao lying parallel to along the sides and within 0 feat, wton ".., +=b�r_q r '-• - measured at right angles, of the above described perpetual easement ''ZI- S Cr _ area, excepting and reserving to grantors the unencumbered enjoyment, } ;r g * � e, 1, m., , use and preservation of all structuroa present upon the premise_°. � This temporary easement shall terminate upon completion of the sewer "'i; ,,fi 4 'tiw -,.•- construction work, at which time, upon request of the owner, the I. A.. V.';.r" gi n' _j; City will issue a written role^so thereof, :Vol-, Ar, -t RECEIVED • ..._:3 Sri.; g.• RSr r !1 Page 1 .. FEB 0 7 2012x,;:; ....4, N .� ,....'- ,.,*..-.1;.'•1 Easement i �'4.'• '';r p• . a,.;f e• '' CITY OF TIGARD -+�'''" `� w'` • -/ ''''"∎I PLANNING/ENGINEERING "', 4[ .1 t .:., "I al* ''0.;: �,ice V, ;V,■ • 5,..M j.1": -...r-n--- ,..!•r.a c•'r';. ;.� r• 4.¢,'.,. .., _ :ire•...•y,,F_�1 C'V tliii.'" S ,{. .. ti Tr..S13 'A-. {� r '.yr. L :.yM .r• e-c• '41'p a(,` • �'.4- a fitet. x.4....-,... ,4 $ e r*h, " $ t•�.., a r$°c t ,,t .1 � 1 : b iVk '' 3L +.. A ,e n t. *v441_ a �., ' 3Y ,L, -.. e .~-r '4 '1., r - ..?t ro-ay ,s • A ` m i i ' � ti Y . A,i + + 9 i. m w.-h,•; I S Yutc c of .07, 7 _{ •a`r- r.r 'r• •∎•••• ,or« .1'--. cif i~ 3 i;.,.: �t,,s�,'�xrr I i � '�' •h a.r s- Z�( 3s #Y rnr,Li4.� • ,-4. � silre-'C,.,�t�:1�I+�ft r•`+-":-,. � -11i41-.4.�_4 t "g.'+t4 h'c' ' 'Y zr. �+'� l.,i .aa ,a'"r7_ r -n.,'+T "�.,;s+ . ,, ,,t,, r ,..i - y n :Y+' ��• -�f"tc.-+4"�il�{7'�li... ��°* +'„3 •47.1'0-!•� --��'"'+++�taacc � Y.l: .t...-t. t 'P.�•a'z`" YdF*.��•. �";� r�'�t. L ti-�''F.'y 1 � jt :-a�` �'�L'�� dgr�r ,t ,.s; r ' ` „ x T'.i)' �tY `ta:r ir'ttgis': �, ti. '#r,1.4; 5;. iw t�ci.n'Mif.+:Ia , k. ..:. . rte' a .,t,. ,[�,, Z' u y •vy ,. fir - `,ir. ,:G; �r.rt-�^^li t �><S: - a7L �. !:��rN•:�y s;,�' Should it be necessary to cut and remove any brush, trees, or other ^yr e t s,, =• ?. •:"1-' �d. matter or materials from the easement area, eaid brush, trees, or other ' + r t 1� t:h` ,,; • matter and materials shall be removed and disposed of by tho City and the , �}.r%ti �a st,:'•`' a city shall leave the easement area in a neat and workmanlike condition. The '7f. r' �'Y it '3. City agrees that in connection with its use of the perpetual easement area t ' S. ;_� ? and in inspecting, repairing, maintaining, or replacing said sewer line, the <ro i',.�,, :d X is City will leave the premises in a neat and workmanlike condition and ae nearly ilr r, ,;l d in the pro-existing tate as 1 "`" Fr}+) i.'.i�}1A4 g practicable. <; •••. r .1- 1 `v i The grantors do hereby warrant that they are the owners in fee simple ),.. .. :F., pk, ^';.0 ''--:2- and have the right to • nt the above dctrrlbed easements. 'Z 4 +A.��, tar• 1•IF,. Gf .[) i ,.., •r..r, 4 • W3.tn. our •a••9 and seals this day of , 19 fit ` s" _ ./"--..12-4 (SEAL) (SEAL) j , 7 Tualatin ve l r a• to •(SEAL) (SEAL) t: --.11� t' wr �. 1i ,�; •` Roderick : Olterpr "rte. and Tualatin Development Co., Inc. (A Joint Venture) '. 1 { r}„ ` • 'Y I 1/11 _(SLALI _ (SEAL) ('. ''r va.'1� Sat'.�.ff.ib j - . :. Sunday CO- t In i;:';„ °i`'' m i'o a c•nsideration, the mortyane lien on the above described x-r ,! +,h � -,-.440:, : properties is hereby made subordinate to the casements above granted ti1+� ti (�rtn.,n,'-"-'� •'e'' tbk I y .1;,,,;..(L.:1`111:541114:1110 r , 1 f-T'wi '•4 r x iryk r rF' fix' o_��r`' �'f; Dated this day of , 19 ..,:,-v-.444...*:•.'r �+a iu [ S';� .a .i;y.',.,,-•i:a, 4..m,,p'i U*L'i1�'T,• ., :is:y,:;t raw,.} ?'r,t.+iY ��lY +4` •: cr Mortgagee� n ©y 00,1,0^t,.111.tir ;'`.S, < y�42, -r SY 7 TN_� \• I• 11 :mss• „t' ; •title •it;,e4,1'at,-�, , ,...„,�.'''e rs �,�r,i�10,i 'I L' STATE OF' ORLGOtu ) .`•`�a 1,”. t^•4 " ,' '";uF R +r.�t, -.A•.,; ;. County of Washington ) i>Yi r,N•.s ;i4i: �•r•`- ^y ''.+�j' dry= i P''' j.i•x , .` ', ' On this 6th day of October 19 79 personally iy?ik%k +-g%S°� �•J ;- sa:f.• appeared the above named Robert C. Luton of Tua)atin Dev. Co., Inc. and Robert C.Lutnn °!1': •� te t• � ( rick Enterprise, Inc., a Joint venture FS ;� of Rode i tuts and Bernard A. Gavino, Jr.J 7+•.;i•y^'`�• x -. re.:.-> d r. of Sunday i4.sr.��,'�.'•-'.'1ix, .7y- `-='- 1-,r_ foRSlaer. Inc, .)it:;Sr .: r.. :;� l:� t_ 'W=f' t$�(gc dI-t •r 'rt d il' aj 17P .- n and acknowledged the foregoing instrument to be their voluntary act and decd ,;; ! ,� 1. � L�' ..\\L. Before me: 4 'y '�r- .•,�.1 r? o , . , t,a t� ,{, a el •u ',•,' ':4,: `otary Pu,1 c -or Oregon lii.� , tr .:. t3� -4- l:: `y I t���M`/ 4.'S,. 1rY�',�t•f' ��-,•r.llrl 1 f. :, l ` It:•y,y4 LHF(Ft'. .tq � }�� :it S" vi•: ., o` My Commission expires: 4/29!8) ti:Ilk::71%i r a�'Y? i tl "f : ::: Z 4i� r t 1 Page 2 %',).. 0tl S I''".mot. t ^.+''.14...:..jN1I.." s� - {; 1, mss ' , Easement / G". i.. � ' ' Jr: ;, .:11'"° .k:;�"' > :sF .e•t^T;c-±R•!•rcr.. - .•r.•• ' .. '''-r.-r.,,•.•:.• ^' ., t r}'"Yn,,,� •=+'S 7:s 9 A. 'yy;• s .4.1 0 �rF',eel.: ` C'''' F-. . {y _,t'. t 4...-!i t.�' 1 �+, '4 7F s'v. a t' ,i r I t n t� ''f ,r., { 4• f'1 i 1 r r t yv�1e�.,sti, ,,�c k 5 .n i' is '7,1 5 •,_:- F ` t. rir I M •t",1 '4'r,-a.. of•rl '� rk ° I2 .. • '• r ?K, F 1 c..i nY, yt 4 ." 1.: , M � _ .h. -"' , R'''''''7"- Y+iL,re01—x:• t }. r •..•.,• , ,, •t4-. •Y -•N x 4 v* -_.W...0.1.1:7°' t' .: t�n1Sy'y�+**1 .,-.. .;.v.� •..- rr,�+,,It?l.fAlr �{k,1.. ''1-,4&"Ii` `u. .4 2gr rr..4r't� ,,.�1`� � � :l'', 4, ",�s„-�`-4 i'., `'� °' ,,•. •'' a' s•^�5"r�'.Iff$, f`vo�e t'i0,... xni ,-'41,,IF 1 iisci,y Is i ,y�,��a._16: s ••' ,;I•i {S ..'yt ,- '4t.. t 7 �• z • . .r'•.. ... 4' ."}„',. ,,..,-,--r.,119:: -. o. '1,y' '�fi_.. ''t ?a3d,, .atrt-y5). y a 3 ;� 75-4_r .'i..,.-: ; 4.:„.7,11.2-:, (�^-•^.1421 - � ' „V.i.'• .. F.-. -.... 's°..r. `�- «"4c ,tw at.". ]''i•+P�, 1Tit. ,tt:G '. _�'.•..Ca'Ii=• ,yµi u,;.:-'50.A. _•-,ri%iv,1/4::, =•.+L t +":r'zi• =!r'` iii"- .•c.iysx-"' i!'.;. .V r a. rw _ __ _ '�• � ._. . tt }. i'.qh- •Z` r''3-.A°�'� $1��r'¢ �•{ � , may. .. ._.,,...' t �W, ' •Y �` i. s52 1 �,-aO�� \ .cam t i,a w.;,.. x1�� ,�ts�g�`�r�' „ 'lr i�f ,� `1� •��..tef ?� '� '�2' 7 .A-rY �-°a :Zf G.�.75..•lJ � 7.i�J.�"S.'+t:�L-� �. 2��..:��'�.', i_L•'(ti''..^sib 'vJ[ ,s ��'�..•r �•`h-1" iT--A• c Regg i �+.w f:t-1 )Tr rt.•r q 1•.1 ! 7 f, m r;!�i.; •f..,_ ..• :• .i y r '. r C,� r r s f 15 r ( • _Y y,. ..Y , r t{ i v 7.:"4: rd+;. h,4;';',:' i • . 'LYa4'i . 1 ) r•t ,v:„:.,„;,,,H,‘,.,r,-,„.....„,,-44,,,,..,.... ..,,,,,01.:, ...,,,,t,...-; , •,..« i-,i '(r . STATE OF OREGON ) :.s ..„,...,ti.,., rG" 0.. r+vwr,' . ...,„••„:z.., .,.ti....„,,,...,..„,,,.. -, ;1:1',, )6S. A i star: .� ,,. 'r1 .s County of ) .•ey''i 1'4 . 'M -FT t. - , &ii ,4%.!,,: On this do of , 19 , personally r .:s c.:}i �" a.• ^ti Y.' t i:.t- .• appeared the above named ti �y� '' .....-1 - t�S F -., ;r?' ?' ^ ''{ and acknowledged the foregoing instrument to be their voluntary act and • �[� U;�, -.rsf.': deed. 1i ''1•'— '•'1•' -A a. ` Be fore me: a 3 4 :�4g, Q �?iu?.i ;. .,,., .�:,,rl y� x 3r. t": ; . • •, , -2..tam`+'r''ti—j.,fr ,'/,, R11 , J. .., Notary Public for Oregon , ,•'_•4,�. •x 4.<< o> t)!'•ti My Commission expires: I ?' t �:=-d� '+.� y• ,��•"""iiiv ✓'.y.: ACCEPTANCE ! K�9 ..>,;♦••• :r. y , try y rf• �+,k,y^'� Y The City above named hereby accepts the foregoing grants and agrees ! s�]y aak % •••...i„, � a I , ; .rl k 4 v Y,, .. i to comply with each and every term and condition thereof, r :',:-..),..e.":','..-- *3 Win. , 999, (l a t,,, • 45'1".41:4 aet Y/ r -i•�, CITY OF 1'ZGARD t:�'i::j `:.�s!�.;� /J,;��;�:6 t...e. sy: _ ^ / I {•- ;,.,.t rr i s 1 1 Y�l''•'rr {���.� "� iJY: /�i7•r.cn Y--T- t ! »'j:1.? ."-.., ir.. YY 4 : fi d-C'.'•' City Recorder .:..:!'�'.....•+. .-:j��•• r <4% ::,, .: s•;.,1'.•-9.Are Vii{ r�+;;,�� i.'.:-.. STATE OF OREGON ) - -,. -1'' I e.lLLV 'f• . , )ss, `r ,:rs�• "�(:1.if� '•,f _, i)ra�-c jr'"'-z` : County of �1D.R k ) : : '.fix:•s, .�hi•' pt.... }`..1t!•a day of '1;.:� "`�a''N`K. ,- '•“•......,J'-`� "•rlt On this S Y Aid , 296 , before me j. } r!,v',r,`. _:•.,.?l t :, appeared _a-/k )?g7.ct'adsmi- and � ..f-, r I. .?.}{..•.r 53il'i;I,ir , l'.f", ;n«t'4'i both to mo personally known who, being duly sworn, did say + r� "4 `"r Ychat he, the 4,1.. r said p 42w, ff.pk!g,r„ is the Mayor, and he the said a,,%,liar¢, ) �' ,�r.a •..•? is the Recorder of the CITY ']F TIGARD, a munic pa P +.• ,� �; . 14111. -5'•'-,t• corporation, and the said pp Ai /s„„ and „r,.,,,.,�L�/,..� _ 1 " ,' a- - , .. • f c°• �j• acknowledged the said instrument to be the free act an acted 1` r y v-4-414.7.'‘.. • >) •:r' of said municipal corporation. :- s!,x '� M f ,* & '3.,n{,•'., IN TESTIMONY 1e1IEREOF, I have hereunto set my hand and affixed my - �,y (.h"•i official seal, this the day and year i this m certificate first written. l i�j3,'L m tvStary Public Oregon { t + '� Pi;p C41.5 . • - T".t"`:1Tttrr`k . � -(1.-..• , y.-.-e 1 r 7+�yT,' My commission expires t Y''' j ,,,_r ' rr-v+t,7Ya • STAT[D/aR6oDN (, r�a'Y� n � il� , `•Kt c� �,� f!tilff'el!'.! fsa•n,•at N',4,Wn, 6, (i 'jrFz.(r t-il'll66 '4" 1. Rogm;T{K,nason.DLr.,a,• f Raea,da 7 , w.-; � '-A •':.d3 fj?.4':£ end fJcctl;:.:7;FSOnk,..pr.«Dar o,run• n'•� -y ?r. vcron,a0 to met.iuirocce,!met,orer,hat 11 y r - ,y:•°/•Nail in.wRMn ltmrlitten alOhlieVI, ..Caen. i r ,e'Yt t�• a �,. 3i., an8,oa:idon,d�.ol ra�nfi4t�°deountr• ,� j } �� i3Pn ,,,,,,���,,yrrr�,' !"fi'; IIOOQR_M9Me80N••Otocror,l S tr 1 •r� ,-+T nr y i, Page 3 now,t46 elx,tan. 'c ♦ i'ti' T .�,•' c r7��. xKEasement f�OV r'r�l.� +D� s, ,.•.•'• ' r ,,;,11, r S`4:1.‘17.-Nell r , q 1 • ta;; ' 3•. . nr t cl 39.7 \cv r 14�,.}'akq t1111/13 ,1 11 Ptrtr3 -. ...-�br • , ---w - ,.. , -.t , s� _� aj ��ii• ';a,=k L 1 a •. r ` . t„ ea z '�e4" > ✓�.. ..w ., .ta, .,....,,.,....,,...1.a. . nc.s � t t • fb l: X�L_ •` ! r� 'F Sn r3H L:`�K .G S rty N � f i es ,v t t l k. ° O • 0'.'^ i ..-�s'i p} = ;r- ,1 i.'', knc. J•S3 .2..r 1." '.. -A^ �;-°: v :--,--- y E: a x' w. � J:. ,Ft • 1@ �' -. ' ) j ,. .. n. • "• ' ;•,.;i' IVctrrcch VQ. 11 °OF `II,P.venue Pci":0un.1.ORyoi 9711 503.284.,,',1 WWW.kc:apcbc.corn Site Development Review Narrative for Schwindt Medical/Dental Office We are submitting for a Site Development Review for the construction of a medical/dental office at 11445 SW Summerfield Drive (tax lots 2S110DC00500 & 01300). The site is currently occupied by a single story building of approximately 567 square feet, a parking lot containing 6 parking spaces, and 9 mature trees. The existing structure and trees will be removed in order to accommodate a single-story, 3,815 square feet building and an expanded parking lot for 15 parking spaces. The following is a written narrative that describes how the proposed development meets the Approval Criteria: 18.360.020 The proposed development is seeking approval through a Site Development Review application as a Major Modification of the existing development as defined in section 18.360.050. 18.360.030 The proposed development is seeking Site Development Review approval as a Major Modification through a Type II procedure as outlined in 18.390.040. 18.360.050.B Major Modification Evaluation Criteria 1. Not applicable, this development is not residential and does not create an increase in dwelling unit density. 2. Not applicable, this development is not residential and does not change the ratio or number of different types of dwelling units. 3. The increased building size requires a minimum of 7 and a maximum of 9 additional on-site parking spaces. 4. The occupancy classification (B as defined by OSSC 304.1) of the new structure is the same as the existing. 5. The height of the new building will be more than 20% taller than the existing building as measured to the average height of the existing pitched roof. 6. There is no change in the type and location of accessway. However the existing parking lot will be expanded and reconfigured to accommodate more spaces. 7. The new development will not result in an increase in vehicular traffic of more than 100 vehicles per day. 8. Not applicable, the new building will be under 5,000 square feet. 9. Not applicable, this development is not multi-family residential and therefore not subject to the open space requirements. 10. Screening and landscaping will meet the minimum level required by code. 11. Not applicable, there are no modifications to the conditions imposed at the time of approval for the original development(SDR 26-79). 18.360.070 Please see the attached existing site conditions analysis, site plan, grading plan, landscape plan, and architectural elevations. Please note, there are no existing or proposed restrictions or covenants. Please see 18.290.040 below for additional submission items. Design Review Narrative for Schwindt Medical/Dental Office Page 1 of 5 December 14, 2011 4119 NE 39th Avenue, Portland, Oregon 97211 p 503.284.6917 f 503.284.6917 www.kasapdx.com Per. NM, rr 18.360.090 The following describes how the proposed development meets the Approval Criteria for Site Development Review: 1. Please see the remainder of this narrative for a description of how the proposed development complies with all of the applicable requirements of this title. 2.a.1. Because of the small size of the site, most of the existing trees will need to be removed to accommodate the proposed building and parking area. Additionally there is 5 to 6 feet of grade change from the south end of the site to the north. In order to work with the topography of the existing accessway, the south end of the site will be regarded. 2.a.2. The site is not subject to ground slumping or sliding. 2.a.3. At the narrowest point, the proposed building is separated from the neighboring building to the west by 20 feet. The north, east and south sides of the building are open to public streets and a shared access drive. Therefore there will be adequate distance between adjoining buildings for light, air circulation, and fire- fighting. 2.a.4. The short sides of the proposed building are oriented to the east and west minimizing solar gain particularly in the summer. Additionally the building entrance has been located on the north side of the building protecting it from the prevailing southern summer winds and eastern winter winds. 2.b. Because of the small size of the site, most of the existing trees will need to be removed to accommodate the proposed building and parking area. However the removal of the existing trees will be mitigated per 18.790. Please see the attached tree assessment from Pacific Resources Group. 2.c. The site is not in a significant habitat area. However storm water management for both the new building and the parking lot area will be provided. The parking lot will be design with pervious pavement and adequate subsurface storage to allow for full infiltration. The roof runoff will be routed to an infiltration swale along the eastern property line. The swale will be designed to Clean Water Services standard for LID projects. 3. Not applicable, the proposed building is not a single-family attached or multi-family structure. 4.a. No buffering is required on the north and west sides of the parking lot. See 18.745. 4.b. Screening of parking lot will be provided as required. See 18.745. 5. Not applicable, the proposed development is not a multi-family or group living use. 6. Not applicable, the proposed development is not a multi-family use. 7. Not applicable, the proposed development is not a multi-family use. 8. Not applicable, the site is not within or adjacent to the 100 year flood plain. 9. The site entrance is located off a shared accessway that is entered from Summerfield Drive. Perimeter landscaping separates the parking from the shared accessway and thereby defines the site as a semi-public space for persons having a right to be there. 10.a. Windows and/or doors are located on an all sides of the building and therefore areas that are vulnerable to crime can be surveyed by the occupants. 10.b. The secondary exterior door to the building can be observed by the occupants of adjacent buildings. 10.c. Not applicable, there are no mailboxes provided as part of the proposed development. Design Review Narrative for Schwindt Medical/Dental Office Page 2 of 5 December 14,2011 4119 NE 39t Avenue, Portland, Oregon 97211 p 503.284.6917 f 503.284.6917 www.kasapdx.com La a ,Fro._ For*cn:, —r_go� rww .cxcpa<.ccr 10.d. Exterior lighting will be provided around the building so that areas that are vulnerable to crime are illuminated. 10.e. Exterior lighting will be provided at the parking lot and pedestrian walkways and will be placed at a height so that light patterns overlap at a height of seven feet which is sufficient to illuminate a person. 11. Not applicable, the proposed development is not adjacent to or within 500 feet of an existing or proposed transit route. 12. Landscaping has been designed in accordance with 18.745. Landscaped areas comprise more than 15% of the site. Please see the landscape plans. 13. Please see the grading planning for site drainage. 14. The site and facility have been designed in accordance with the requirements of ORS 447 and Chapter 11 of the Oregon Structural Specialty Code. 15. Please see the remainder of this narrative for a description of how the proposed development complies with the provisions and regulations of the underlying zone. 18.390.040.A A pre-application conference was held on July 19, 2011. 18.520.020.0 The site is zoned C-G (PD). Tbl 18.520.1 Offices are permitted out-right. Tbl 18.520.1 Minimum lot size: none Minimum lot width: 50 ft. Actual lot width: 110 ft. Minimum front yard setback: 0 ft. Minimum side facing street: none, provisions of Chp. 18.795 (Vision Clearance) must be satisfied. Minimum side yard: 0 ft. Minimum rear yard: 0 ft. Minimum building height: none Maximum building height: 45 ft. Actual building height: 21 ft. (measured to the midpoint of the gabled roof) Maximum site coverage: 85% (including all buildings and impervious surfaces) Actual site coverage: 80% Minimum landscape requirement: 2,273 sq. ft. (15% of 15,165 sq.ft.) Actual landscape provided: 3,051 sq. ft. (20%of 15,165 sq.ft.) 18.705.030.C.1 The property shares a 25-foot wide reciprocal access easement with the adjacent properties. The easement is on the north side of the property and was recorded with Washington County Deed Records per document 85-019789 a copy of which is included in our application. 18.705.030.F A walkway will connect the building entrance to Summerfield Drive which provides access and egress to the site. The walkway is 5% feet wide. This width is exclusive of vehicle overhangs since each parking space is provided with a wheel stop that is 3 feet back from the front of the parking stall. The walkway is separated from vehicle traffic by a 6-inch tall curb and it does not cross traffic. Design Review Narrative for Schwindt Medical/Dental Office Page 3 of 5 December 14, 2011 4119 NE 391h Avenue, Portland, Oregon 97211 p 503.284.6917 f 503.284.6917 www.kasapdx.com / a 4119 NE 391-:Avenue POIIIOnC,Oregcn'7i 1 503::. .01 www.kasapclx.corn 18.705.030.H The existing shared driveway accesses Summerfield Drive 120 feet from the intersection of Summerfield Drive and Durham Road (an arterial street) as measured from the right- of-way line of the intersecting street to the throat of the proposed driveway. This driveway provides adequate stacking needs, sight distance and deceleration standards. No changes to the shared driveway are proposed as part of this development. Tb1 18.705.3 Driveway provided: 1 existing on the north side of the site Existing access width: 50 ft. as measured at the curb line of Summerfield Drive Minimum pavement: 24 ft. with curbs (existing) 18.705.030.J.2 The parking is located adjacent to the primary entrance to the building. 18.705.030.K The parking lot does not utilize one-way traffic flow. 18.745.040 Street trees will be provided along the south property line (Durham Road) and the east property line (Summerfield Drive) and north property line (private driveway). Please see the landscape plan for location sizes and spacing. There are no existing street trees on the site. All the existing trees are interior to the site. The removal of these trees will be mitigated per 18.790. 18.745.050.E.1.a Please see the attached landscape plan for screening of the parking lot and planting of trees in the parking lot. 18.755.040.C.5.b.1 A solid waste and recycling storage area has been included in the building. The storage area is approximately 100 sq. ft. Please see the site plan for the location. Pride Disposal will be providing roll-carts for curbside service. Please see the attached email from Pride Disposal. Tbl 18.765.2 Vehicle parking: Minimum required: 15 spaces (3.9/1,000) Maximum allowed: 19 spaces (4.9/1,000) Actual proposed: 15 spaces comprised of 8 standard size spaces (included 1 accessible space) and 7 compact spaces Bicycle parking: Minimum required: 2 spaces Actual proposed: 2 spaces 18.765.040.1 Please see the attached site plan for parking lot striping. 18.765.040.J Wheel stops will be provided 3 feet from the front of each parking space. 18.765.040.N Proposed Standard parking space size: 9 ft. x 18%ft. Proposed Compact parking space size: 73/4 ft. x 16%ft. Proposed Aisle width: 26 ft. 18.765.050 2 bicycle parking spaces will be provided on the north side of the building near the entrance. The bicycle parking are will be covered. Please see the attached site plan for bicycle parking location, space size and configuration. Design Review Narrative for Schwindt Medical/Dental Office Page 4 of 5 December 14, 2011 4119 NE 39`r'Avenue, Portland, Oregon 97211 p 503.284.6917 f 503.284.6917 www.kasapdx.com in architect;,�n-. 4119 NE 39th Aoenue Portland,Oregon x7211 503.284.6917 www.kasapdx.corn 18.765.080.A No loading space is required for this size of building. 18.790.030.A There are several mature trees that are located at the interior of the site that will be removed as part of this proposed development. Please see the attached tree plan and landscape plan for the identification of the location, size and species of the trees. The removal of the existing trees will be mitigated per 18.790. Please see the attached tree assessment from Pacific Resources Group. 18.795.030.B Clear vision areas will be provided at the intersection of Summerfield Dr. and Durham Rd. and at the access to Summerfield Dr. Please see the site plan. 18.795.040 Clear vision size Summerfield Dr. and Durham Rd.: 35 ft. each side of intersection Entrance off Summerfield Dr.: 30 ft. from side of Summerfield to centerline of entrance. 18.810.050.A The property has access to the city sewer line located on the north side of the property in a 15-foot wide easement that was recorded with Washington County Deed Records per document 79046729 a copy of which is included in our application. 18.810.050.A There will be no change to the lot size, shape and frontage other than the dedication at the intersection of Summerfield Drive and Durham Road as requested by the City of Tigard Engineering Department. 18.810.070 There will be no change to the existing sidewalks as part of the proposed development. 18.810.090 A new sanitary sewer line will be connected to the existing sewer line on the north side of the property. Please see that attached utility plan. 18.810.100 Please see the utility and grading plans for the proposed storm water drainage system. 18.810.120 All the existing utilities to the site are located underground. Please see the utility plan. Design Review Narrative for Schwindt Medical/Dental Office Page 5 of 5 December 14, 2011 4119 NE 391h Avenue, Portland, Oregon 97211 p 503.284.6917 f 503.284.6917 www.kasapdx.com I(VpCLCt S±vcLj 1,E 3,-r1 A'eriu& Por',ana.Oregon/7211 5C 3.284.6?1 WNNV.kc2.apax.carn Impact Study for Schwindt Medical/Dental Office The following study describes and quantifies the impact of the development on public facilities and services with regards to the transportation system, the drainage system, the parks system, the water system, the sewer system, and the noise: Transportation System The site is located at the intersection of Summerfield Drive and Durham Road, an arterial street. Both roadways are fully improved adjacent to this site. The classification for the development according to the ITE Trip Generation Manual is 720 Medical Dental Office Building. Accordingly the development will generate an AM Peak of 5 trips, a PM Peak of 12 trips and a weekday total of 105 trips. The engineering department has requested a 20-foot radius right-of-way dedication for the return at Durham Road and Summerfield drive and a sidewalk easement to cover the portion of sidewalk on Summerfield Drive that is outside the right-of-way. We are working with Gus Duenas to create the documents for a 21/2-foot wide easement to cover the sidewalk and a 20-foot radius dedication. Access to the new building will be provided by an existing shared accessway off of Summerfield Drive. The shared accessway is located in a 25-foot wide reciprocal access easement on the north side of the property. The easement and was recorded with Washington County Deed Records per document 85- 019789 a copy of which is included in our application. No new accessways are proposed as part of this development. Storm Drainage System The existing site does not connect to an existing storm system. Storm water sheet flows off the site eventually entering a system northeast of the site on SW Summerfield Drive. There is no detention or retention for the existing site. There is no pollution reduction for the existing site. Per conversations with the engineering department, this project will requires storm water management for both the new building and the parking lot area. The parking lot will be design with pervious pavement and adequate subsurface storage to allow for full infiltration. The roof runoff will be routed to an infiltration swale along the eastern property line. The swale will be designed to Clean Water Services standard for LID projects. Parks System 9 full-time employees will be employed within the development. Therefore there will be minimal impact on the parks system. Water System There is an existing 11/2-inch water meter that supplies the site from a 12-inch water line in SW Durham Road. This water meter will be utilized for the new building and site irrigation. The meter also supplies irrigation water for a portion of the property at the east side of the intersection of SW Summerfield Drive and SW Durham Road via a water line that crosses under Summerfield Drive. This private line will be abandoned during construction. The property that this line supplies water to is owned by the Summerfield Civic Association. The current owner of 11445 SW Summerfield Drive has notified the association that the billing arrangement between the association and the owner will be terminated and that they will need Impact Study for Schwindt Medical/Dental Office Page 1 of 2 December 14,2011 4119 NE 39"'Avenue, Portland, Oregon 97211 p 503.284.6917 f 503.284.6917 www.kasapdx.com LA A 411',NE.Oit Fortiorn Oregon,47_211 wvw.kCOon :.cCrn to arrange for a new water supply for their irrigation. A copy of the notification letter is included in our application. Sanitary Sewer System The site is presently served from an 8-inch public sanitary sewer line which is located to the north of the property. This public line is located in a 15-foot wide easement that was recorded with Washington County Deed Records per document 79046729 a copy of which is included in our application. There is an existing lateral from this public line that will adequately serve the new building. Noise Impact The new building will be utilized as a medical/dental office and therefore will not generate significant noise that would impact the surrounding environment. Vehicular traffic, including deliveries and garbage service will be moderate and will not create significant noise. Impact Study for Schwindt Medical/Dental Office Page 2 of 2 December 14, 2011 4119 NE 39'r'Avenue, Portland, Oregon 97211 p 503.284.6917 f 503.284.6917 www.kasapdx.com Page 1 of 2 Kevin Saxton From: Kelsey Williams [kelsey @pridedisposal.com] Sent: Friday, August 05, 2011 12:51 PM IRECEI'tJED To: Kevin Saxton Subject: RE: Enclosure Requirements for 11445 SW Summerfield Drive FEB 0 3 2012 CITY OF TIGARD Kevin, PLANNING/ENGINEERING Yes, we will provide the roll carts. For trash service we have several sizes 20g, 2g,60g and 90g. for co-mingle recycle we have 90g. which is included in the trash rate. I believe with roll carts we would not need any site plans as they would be placed curbside. If you would like to send me site plans we may, however we don't do approval letters on roll carts only the front load containers. I hope this helps out. -Kelsey From: Kevin Saxton [mailto:ksaxton @kasapdx.com] Sent: Friday, August 05, 2011 12:48 PM To: Kelsey Williams Subject: RE: Enclosure Requirements for 11445 SW Summerfield Drive Thanks Kelsey. Does Pride supply the roll carts or does the owner need to provide their own? What size are the carts? Also should I still provide a site plan so that you can generate an approval letter? Thanks for your help! Sincerely, Kevin Saxton LEED®AP KASA architects,Inc. 4119 NE 39th Avenue Portland,Oregon 97211 503.284.6917 From: Kelsey Williams [mailto:kelsey @pridedisposal.com] Sent: Friday, August 05, 2011 12:06 PM To: Kevin Saxton Subject: RE: Enclosure Requirements for 11445 SW Summerfield Drive Hi Kevin, Yes they can certainly go with roll carts for service. With roll carts they have be placed curbside for service. If you have any further questions,please feel free to contact me. Have a great weekend. 2/2/2012 Page 2 of 2 -Kelsey From: Kevin Saxton [mailto:ksaxton @ kasapdx.com] Sent: Friday, August 05, 2011 11:08 AM To: Kelsey Williams Subject: RE: Enclosure Requirements for 11445 SW Summerfield Drive Hi Kelsey, Thank you for sending the enclosure requirements to me. In talking with the owner, 2 commercial containers are much more than what they need and generate trash &recycling wise. Would it be possible to go with a roll out service? The office is only 3,000 sq. ft. Sincerely, Kevin Saxton LEED®AP KASA architects,Inc. 4119 NE 39th Avenue Portland,Oregon 97211 503.284.6917 From: Kelsey Williams [mailto:kelsey @pridedisposal.com] Sent: Monday, July 18, 2011 12:16 PM To: ksaxton @kasapdx.com Subject: RE: Enclosure Requirements Hi Kevin, Here are the enclosure requirements. Once you have reviewed them please send me a copy of the site plans s I can review them and give you an approval letter. If you have any questions please feel free to contact me. Kelsey W. Commercial & Drop Box Rep P: 503.625.6177 x 105 F: 503.625.6179 kelseyw n pridedisposal.com Pride Recycling- Document Destruction 503.625.0725 2/2/2012 D a [►g (� Clean Water Services File Number DEC 27 2011 CleanWater Services 0 k-000640 •ensitive Area Pre-Screening Site Assessment y .,. _'' 1 - 2. Property Information (example 1S234AB01400) 3. Owner Information Tax lot ID(s): 2S110DC00500 Name: Brandon Schwindt Company: CDBK Properties t_Lc- Address: 11565 SW Durham Road Site Address: 11445 SW Summerfield Drive City,State,Zip:Tigard OR 97219 City,State,Zip:Tigard, OR PhonelFax:503-332-8450 Nearest Cross Street: E-Mail brandon_schwindt @yahoo.com 4. Development Activity (check all that apply) 5. Applicant Information ❑ Addition to Single Family Residence(rooms,deck,garage) Name: Brandon Schwindt ❑ Lot Line Adjustment ❑ Minor Land Partition Company: CDBK Properties LL. .. ❑ Residential Condominium ❑ Commercial Condominium Address: 11565 SW Durham Road ❑ Residential Subdivision ❑ Commercial Subdivision Tigard, OR 97219 12 Single Lot Commercial ❑ Multi Lot Commercial City, Stale, Zip: 9 Other Phone/Fax:203-332-8450 E-Mail: brandon_schwindt@yahoo.com 6. Will the project involve any off-site work? ❑Yes I@ No L]Unknown Location and description of off-site work 7. Additional comments or information that may be needed to understand your project Remove existing building and construct new 3000 SF dental office with associated parking This application does NOT replace Grading and Erosion Control Permits,Connection Permits,Building Permits,Site Development Permits,DEQ 1200-C Permit or other permits as issued by the Department of Environmental Quality,Department of State Lands and/or Department of the Army COE. All required permits and approvals must be obtained and completed under applicable local,state,and federal law. By signing this form,the Owner or Owner's authorized agent or representative,acknowledges and agrees that employees of Clean Water Services have authority to enter the project site at all reasonable times for the purpose of inspecting project site conditions and gathering information related to the project site. I certify that I am familiar with the information contained in this document,and to the best of my knowledge and belief,this information is true,complete,and accurate. Print/Type Name r k Print/Type Title (1 /t5«MA- S' n r D&e rZ 21 f rf rg atu a �� FOR DISTRIC SE ONLY ❑ Sensitive areas po-ntiaily exist on site or with 200'of the site. THE APPLICANT MUST PERFORM A SITE ASSESSMENT PRIOR TO ISSUANCE OF A SERVICE PROVIDER LETTER. If Sensitive Areas exist on the site or within 200 feet on adjacent properties,a Natural Resources Assessment Report /may also be required. Based on review of the submitted materials and best available Information Sensitive areas do not appear to exist on site or within 200'of the site.This Sensitive Area Pre-Screening Site Assessment does NOT eliminate the need to evaluate end protect water quality sensitive areas if they are subsequently discovered.This document will serve as your Service Provider letter as required by Resolution and Order 07-20, Section 3.02.1. All required permits and approvals must be obtained and completed under applicable local,State,and federal law. ❑ Based on review of the submitted materials and best available information the above referenced project will not significantly impact the existing or potentially sensitive area(s)found near the site.This Sensitive Area Pre-Screening Site Assessment does NOT eliminate the need to evil late and protect additional water quality sensitive areas if they are subsequently discovered.This document will serve as your Service Provider letter as required by Resolution and Order 07-20,Section 3.02.1. All required permits and approvals must be obtained and completed under applicable local,state and federal law. (3 This Service Provider Letter is not valid unless CWS approved site plan(s)are attached. ❑ The proposed activity does not meet the definition of development or the lot was platted after 919195 ORS 92,040(2). NO SITE ASSESSMENT OR SERVICE PRO I R LETTER IS REQUIRED. Reviewed by � G Date l ZeZ��I 2550 SW Hillsboro Highway • Hillsboro,Oregon 97123 • Phone:(503)681-5100 • Fax:(503)681-4439 • www.cleanwaterservices.org Harper KAS-03 4 H P Houf Peterson Righellis Inc. December 12, 2011 City of Tigard CD — Development Engineering 13125 SW Hall Boulevard Tigard, OR 97223 503-639-4171 Fax: 503-624-0752 http://www.tigard-or.gov Attn: Gus Ducnas RE: Sechwindt Dentist Office—Sight Distance Certification The access for this proposal is located 54 feet west of the site's east property line onto the private access, off of SW Summerfield Drive. The speed limit along the private drive is 10 M.P.H., based upon the posted speed limit requiring 50 feet of sight distance in both directions, in accord with Tigard Development Code Section 18.705.030.H.1. As required by Code Sections 18.705.030.H.1, sight distance from the access to the private drive was measured to be 110 feet to the east of the access in the other direction. The Code Section requires that measurements be based on an eye height of 3.5 feet and an object height of 4.25 feet above the road; and be assumed to be 10 feet from the near edge of pavement to the front of a stopped vehicle, (actual measurement is taken 15 feet from pavement edge). In conclusion, I hereby certify that the intersection sight distance at the proposed access for Sechwindt Dentist Office conforms to the requirements for sight distance as set forth in the Tigard Development Code. • Kenneth M. Ackerman, P.E. dim4r 77CAM rrr. 12. 31-2vl/ 205 SE Spokane Street • Suite 200 • Portland, OR 97202 • www.hhpr.com • 503.221.1131 ph • 503.221.1171 fax Tree A 3sessnlenf T H E A F 1 C RE Xp U R A\\ G R p U'\P LAND MANAGERS UR AN FORESTERS.pN P ASERS.NApU L xESDUR CE coNSULAs September g '011 Kevin Saxton arc portl d 39 Av Inc' and enue Oregon 97211 Subject: Tree a s s e s s m e a t o n future uture dental office S/to off s u m m e d`e l d Dr., r, 'Tigard, 1 S a r d , Oregon O you n h Mr. Saxton Ass usted,I have visited the site o f the proposed Pediatric Dental Office to assess ethe ss e treea not °ryeyh s y provided have recorded e on the enclosed cha p that hs survey number and includes their species,crown health,comments related to Pro blems or defects.Most were in ei uo�oad health with the ceprion°f T6, w htI in very r c ndi�i This tree infested insects and has poor h major o 7ofth ruyn the insects and failure. f were not n the way ofc°nsg �t i iw° l d rsaO mnd its removal. with size I�pve had h ° runitY tore ew the proed gradin g of the si for te t°a� �odate the proposed dental office and parking for a property is relatively s mall and building and Parkin t will occupy the aea containing of the 9 Fees on site, The remaining trees(T1 T2)art located next to the west property line.In the ume of c construction o f the ant commercial dev elopme nt, the west half of the root 1 ' of these two trees was buried under fill d roots may have been severed bx Cava �red uc the root system. Construction of proposed improvements will requi re c°nside m grad e changes and excavation will the mNroat sY of trees Tl and T2. The either unsafe to standing o not survive.I am recommending the removal of all f trees the s tj;erreVg ewinthe site plan is°wag�modify e p�t s prOure fight u t of the existing trees meede $n ceq he pro jeY reading°f s Jte lopm t n$ests that the will requ m't'�ation preserve 12"017 an h for inch basis. It appears that trees, 7'4, T6 removal the mitigation for the equivalent of 94 diameter t t is small accommodate erge num(etes might consider t"creasi tithe f the trees Pel P ev ous projects the Cihhas allowed miS n credit for the size o ascape and s above ten1l mmtut1 required size. There SW ME41)0wgRD s 30o LAO osGO OREGON 97p3S the (503)222-4320 (425)4SI.g620 might also be an opportunity for mitigation tree planting off site. The particulars of this possibility should be discussed with the City Arborist. If I can suggest suitable tree species or assist you in acquiring the trees that will meet the City's requirements, please let me know. This completes my report. If any additional information, which would effect my conclusions and recommendations, becomes available I would welcome the opportunity to consider it and revise this report accordingly. If I omitted any information or if you have any questions please do not hesitate to contact mc. Sincerely yours, h Steph-n F. Goet , Princi!f American Society of Consulting Arborists Reg#260 American Society of Landscape Architects,Or Lic.#80 Society of American Foresters SG:mac Enclosure ARBORIST DISCLOSURE STATEMENT: Arborists are tree specialists who use their education,knowledge training and experience to examine trees, recommend measures to enhance their health and beauty and to attempt to reduce the risk of living near trees. Clients may choose to accept or disregard the recommendations of the arborist or to seek additional advice. Trees and other plant lift are living,changing organisms affected by innumerable factors beyond our control. Trees fail in ways and because of conditions we do not fully understand. Arborists cannot detect or anticipate every condition or event that could possibly lead to the structural failure of a tree. Conditions are often hidden within the trees and below ground. Arborists cannot guarantee that a tree will be healthy or safe under all circumstances,for any specific period or when a tree or its parts may fail.Further,remedial treatments,as with any treatment or therapy, cannot be guaranteed. Treatment,pruning,bracing and removal of trees may involve considerations beyond the scope of the arborists skills and usual services such as the boundaries of properties,property ownership,site lines,neighbor disputes and agreements and other issues. Therefore,arborists cannot consider such issues unless complete and accurate information is disclosed in a timely fashion.Then,the arborist can be expected,reasonably,to rely upon the completeness and accuracy of the information provided. Trees can be managed but not controlled. To live near trees,regardless of their condition,is to accept some degree of risk. The only way to eliminate all risk associated with trees is to eliminate all trees. t;AZARD/HAZARD POTENTIAL For the purposes of this evaluation and/report,a tree or tree part that presents a threat to humans,livestock,vehicles, structures,landscape features or other entity of civilization from uprooting,falling,breaking or growth development(e.g.,roots). While all large landscape trees in proximity to such targets present some degree of hazard regardless of their condition,such inherent hazard is not intended as within this definition and its usage in this evaluation and report. INSPECTION LIMITATIONS: The inspection of these trees consisted solely of a visual inspection from the ground. While more thorough teclroiques are available for inspection and evaluation,they were neither requested nor considered necessary or appropriate at this time.As trees and other plant life are living, changing organisms effected by innumerable factors beyond our control,The Pacific Resources Group and its personnel offer no guarantees,stated or implied, as to tree,plant or general landscape safety,health,condition or improvement,beyond that specifically stated in writing in accepted contracts. • PEDIATRIC DENTAL OFFICE TREE ASSESSMENT Tree Dia. Crown No. Inches Species Ht/Width Health Condition Comments Few&minor or correctable Tree appears to be on property line.Crown is off balance to west.Significant T1 12 Norway Maple 28 x 23 Good defects amount of fill placed over top of half of root system on west side of tree. Moderate&non-correctable Partial crown due to crowding of building to west.Significant amount of fill placed T2 12 Port Orford Cedar 65 x 23 Good defects over half of root system on west side of tree. Tree has partial crown due to crowding by adjacent tree.Tree has lots of fine dead Moderate&non-correctable wood throughout crown and has produced below average annual twig growth for 13 30 Northern Red Oak 75 x 60 Fair defects several years.This suggests tree was in declining health. Tree has partial crown due to crowding by adjacent tree.Tree has lots of fine dead Moderate&non-correctable wood throughout crown and has produced below average annual twig growth for T4 30 Northern Red Oak 75 x 60 Fair defects several years.This suggests tree was in declining health. Moderate&non-correctable I S 12 European Beech 55 x 20 Fair defects Partial crown due to crowding.Two stems at 6' Tree has been topped&has very poor form as a result.Tree has a borer infestation '16 14 Shore Pine 30 x 23 Poor Major defects or problems and has lost major portions of the crown due structural defects. 5,5,5, 4,3.5, Partial one sided crown that leans to east.Poor specimen with poor structure that is T7 3.5,3 Japanese Maple 15 x 25 Fair Major defects or problems not correctable. Moderate&non-correctable T8 20 Schwedler Norway Maple 50 x 50 Good defects Dense full crown with 2 stems at 5' Moderate&non-correctable T9 12 Colorado Blue Spruce 65 x 25 Fair defects Partial crown due to crowding by tree T8. Pediatric Dental Office Tree Assessment,©20l1 The Pacific Resources Group,8/31/11 1 S -brwi \i\Ja± r Schwindt Dentist Office Preliminary Stormwater Management Plan / / Tgr_ �► - � y I II _ j __ .i• J I. ; I r r r Prepared For: KASA Architects Prepared By: Ken Ackerman, P.E.—Project Eningeer December 2011 Harper HP Houf Peterson Righellis Inc. ENGINEERS • PLANNERS LANDSCAPE ARCMITECTS•SUR VE EONS 205 SE Spokane Street, Suite 200 Portland, OR 97202 ph: 503-221-1131 fax: 503-221-1171 Schwindt Dentist Office Draft Stormwater Management Report Introduction Background The Schwindt Dentist Office site is a little over than a third of an acre (15,148 sf) located in Tigard, Oregon at the intersection of SW Durham Road and SW Summerfield Drive. This site will be privately maintained by the property owner. The project improvements include the construction of a new building, parking lots, drive isles, and low impact development (LID) stormwater facilities providing water quality treatment and detention while infiltration occurs. Refer to Appendix 1 for pre and post- developed basin maps and site conditions. Purpose and Objectives The purpose of this drainage report is to present options for best management practices (BMP) for conveyance, detention and water quality treatment to be installed as part of this project. The City of Tigard Zoning and Development Ordinance was used as a guideline. Basin Characteristics The Schwindt Dentist Office project was analyzed using only one pre-developed basin (site area only) sheet flowing northeast off site and two post-developed drainage basins (site area only) contributing to two proposed stromwater facilities. Refer to Appendix 1 for pre and post-developed basin maps and site conditions. For the purpose of obtaining pre-developed time of concentration and peak flows, site conditions prior to any development taking place were analyzed. Results indicated a 2 minute time of concentration, therefore 5 minutes was used as a minimum. Post-developed time of concentration (Tc) and peak flows were analyzed per the proposed improvements using the Santa Barbara Urban Hydrograph (SBUH) method. A 25-year, 24-hour storm event precipitation rate of 3.2 inches (per isopluvial maps, see appendix 2) was used with the Natural Resource Conservation Service (NRCS) Technical Release 55 (TR-55) method for obtaining T, and the Santa Barbara Urban Hydrograph (SBUH) method was used for obtaining peak flows. The proposed impervious area Tc for all basins was found to be less than 5 minute, therefore 5 minutes was used as a minimum. Page 1 Schwindt Dentist Office Draft Stormwater Management Report Soils Characteristics The Natural Resources Conservation Service (NRCS) with the United States Department of Agriculture (USDA) has classified the soils within Washington County in the Soil Survey of Washington County Manual. Soils are categorized into Hydrologic Soil Groups based on estimated runoff from precipitation. These groupings assume the soils are saturated and receive precipitation from long-duration storms. This rainfall to runoff relationship is complex and includes the Drainage and Permeability characteristics of the soil. The soils which reside onsite are silt loam and have a hydrological grouping classification of B. Refer to Appendix 2 for Soil Survey Map, Appendix 3 for the Schwindt Dentist Office Geotechnical report and Appendix 8 for pertinent soil information from the Schwindt Dentist Office Project Drainage Report. Soils Assumptions: Curve Numbers = 69 Pre-developed pervious conditions 98 for Post-developed Impervious Area 61 for Post-developed Good Conditions Open Space (Soil Type B) Sheet Flow Mannings "n" = 0.011 for pavement 0.15 for short prairie grass and lawn Tested infiltration rates (GeoDesign) = 4.45 in/hr (see Appendix 3 for Geotechnical report. A factor of safety of 2 was applied to the GeoDesign infiltration rates yielding 2.2 in/hr for underlining soils rates. The proposed pervious pavement and infiltration swale are modeled based on the infiltration rate of the underlining soil media (2.2 in/hr). Stormwater will infiltrate at the underlining soil infiltration rate after being treated by migrating through the LID amended soil (4 in/hr) which provides water quality filtering and flow control. All runoff is disposed via infiltration within the LID facilities. This infiltration flow is extracted from the peak flow within the hydraflow model, which will recharge groundwater. The topsoil mix is specified as 67% sandy loam (33.5% sand, 33.5% topsoil) and 33% compost. This material has an estimated hydraulic conductivity of approximately 4 in/hr. The NRCS soil survey confirmed this is within a reasonable range. The City of Portland's stormwater topsoil vendor and hauler list which provides the specified growing medium mixture per the City's topsoil specification will be used to ensure adequately draining soil is installed for the growing medium material. Page 2 f Irk i �' `—� _czw — _ lC 0 0 o h 11 1 n �oo 4. c--_ DAn I 2 $D y n as a o S.W. SUMMERFIELD DR. / \\\ gmo Z G \c: 2a �0A n C)a", z 0 rn � �Z8 Ind Harper DRAINAGE AREA EXHIBIT Ha Peterson P, ' I-•' �/ rp RighellisInc. SCE'. ..NIDT MEDICAL/DENTAL OFFICE TIGARD,OREGON 1 Hydrograph Report Hydraflow Hydrographs Extension forAutoCAD®Civil 3D®2009 by Autodesk,Inc.v6.066 Thursday, Dec 15,2011 Hyd. No. 1 Parking and Contributing Area Hydrograph type = SBUH Runoff Peak discharge = 0.137 cfs Storm frequency = 25 yrs Time to peak = 474 min Time interval = 2 min Hyd. volume = 1,996 cuft Drainage area = 0.150 ac Curve number = 98 Basin Slope = 0.0 % Hydraulic length = 0 ft Tc method = USER Time of conc. (Tc) = 5.00 min Total precip. = 3.90 in Distribution = Type IA Storm duration = 24 hrs Shape factor = N/A Parking and Contributing Area Q (cfs) Hyd. No. 1 --25 Year Q (cfs) 0.50 - - 0.50 0.45 0.45 0.40 0.40 0.35 0.35 0.30 - 0.30 0.25 - 0.25 0.20 - - 0.20 0.15 0.15 0.10 - 0.10 0.05 —— - 0.05 0.00 - 0.00 0 120 240 360 480 600 720 840 960 1080 1200 1320 1440 1560 Hyd No. 1 Time (min) 2 Hydrograph Report Hydraflow Hydrographs Extension for AutoCAD®Civil 3D®2009 byAutodesk,Inc.v6.066 Thursday,Dec 15,2011 Hyd. No. 3 Pervious Pavement Hydrograph type = Reservoir Peak discharge = 0.000 cfs Storm frequency = 25 yrs Time to peak = 510 min Time interval = 2 min Hyd. volume = 0 cuft Inflow hyd. No. = 1 - Parking and Contributing Area Max. Elevation = 100.07 ft Reservoir name = Pervious Pavement Max. Storage = 75 cuft Storage Indication method used. Exfiltration extracted from Outflow. Pervious Pavement Q (cfs) Hyd. No. 3 --25 Year Q(cfs) 0.50 - - 0.50 0.45 - 0.45 0.40 0.40 0.35 - 0.35 0.30 0.30 0.25 0.25 0.20 - 0.20 0.15 0.15 0.10 0.10 0.05 - 0.05 0.00 - — -- 0.00 0 120 240 360 480 600 720 840 960 1080 1200 1320 Hyd No. 3 Hyd No. 1 Time (min} y y 1 Total storage used = 75 cult Hydrograph Report 3 Hydraflow Hydrographs Extension for AutoCAD®Civil 3D®2009 byAutodesk, Inc.v6.066 Thursday,Dec 15,2011 Hyd. No. 5 Roof Area Hydrograph type = SBUH Runoff Peak discharge = 0.081 cfs Storm frequency = 25 yrs Time to peak = 474 min Time interval = 2 min Hyd. volume = 1,160 cuft Drainage area = 0.090 ac Curve number = 97 Basin Slope = 0.0 % Hydraulic length = 0 ft Tc method = USER Time of conc. (Tc) = 5.00 min Total precip. = 3.90 in Distribution = Type IA Storm duration = 24 hrs Shape factor = N/A Roof Area Q (cfs) Q (cfs) Hyd. No. 5--25 Year ) 0.10 0.10 0.09 . 0.09 0.08 0.08 0.07 0.07 0.06 0.06 0.05 0.05 0.04 0.04 0.03 0.03 0.02 0.02 0.01 — 0.01 0.00 -- 0.00 0 120 240 360 480 600 720 840 960 1080 1200 1320 1440 1560 Hyd No. 5 Time (min) • 4 Hydrograph Report Hydraflow Hydrographs Extension for AutoCAD®Civil 3D®2009 by Autodesk, Inc.v6.066 Thursday,Dec 15,2011 Hyd. No. 7 Infiltration Swale Hydrograph type = Reservoir Peak discharge = 0.000 cfs Storm frequency = 25 yrs Time to peak = 478 min Time interval = 2 min Hyd. volume = 0 cuft Inflow hyd. No. = 5 - Roof Area Max. Elevation = 101.02 ft Reservoir name = Infiltration Swale Max. Storage = 378 cuft Storage Indication method used. Exfiltration extracted from Outflow. Infiltration Swale Q (cfs) Hyd. No. 7--25 Year Q (cfs) 0.10 — 0.10 0.09 0.09 0.08 0.08 0.07 - 0.07 0.06 0.06 0.05 0.05 0.04 0.04 0.03 0.03 0.02 0.02 0.01 r 0.01 0.00 •- 0.00 0 240 480 720 960 1200 1440 1680 1920 2160 Time(min) Hyd No. 7 — Hyd No 5 Total storage used = 378 cuft RECEIVED FEB 0 3 2012 G EODESIGIU CITY OF TIGARD ? PLANNING/ENGINEERING REPORT OF GEOTECHNICAL ENGINEERING SERVICES Schwindt Dental Office 11445 SW Summerfield Drive Tigard, Oregon For Brandon Schwindt, DMD, PC October 31, 2011 GeoDesign Project: SchmidtB-1-01 Engineers I Geologists I Environmental Consultants GEODESIGN? October 31, 2011 Brandon Schwindt, DMD, PC 11565 SW Durham Road Budding F, Suite 100 Tigard, OR 97224 Attention: Dr. Brandon Schwindt Report of Geotechnical Engineering Services Schwindt Dental Office 11445 SW Summerfield Drive Tigard, Oregon GeoDesign Project: SchwindtB-1-01 We are pleased to submit this report of geotechnical engineering services for the proposed dental office located at 11445 SW Summerfield Drive in Tigard, Oregon. Our services for this project were conducted in accordance with our proposal dated October 3, 2011. We appreciate the opportunity to be of continued service to you. Please contact us if you have questions regarding this report. Sincerely, GeoDes'•n, Inc. Brett A. Shipton, P.E., G.E. Principal Engineer cc: Mr. Kevin Saxton, Kasa Architects (via email only) Mr. Ken Ackerman, Harper Houf Peterson Righellis, Inc. (via email only) TCM:BAS:kt Attachments One copy submitted(via email only) Document ID:SchwindtB-1-01-1031 1 1-geor.doc ©201 1 GeoDesign,Inc. All rights reserved. 15575 SW Sequoia Pkwy•Suite 100 Portland,OR 97224 I off 503.968.8787 I Fax 503.968.3068 1 TABLE OF CONTENTS PAGE NO. 1.0 INTRODUCTION 1 2.0 PROJECT UNDERSTANDING 1 3.0 SCOPE OF SERVICES 1 4.0 SITE DESCRIPTION 2 4.1 Surface Conditions 2 4.2 Subsurface Conditions 2 5.0 CONCLUSIONS 3 6.0 SITE DEVELOPMENT RECOMMENDATIONS 3 6.1 Site Preparation 3 6.2 Wet Weather/Wet Soil Grading 4 6.3 Temporary Slopes 4 6.4 Structural Fill 5 6.5 Fill Placement and Compaction 5 6.6 Permanent Cut and Fill Slopes 7 6.7 Erosion Control 7 7.0 FOUNDATION SUPPORT RECOMMENDATIONS 7 7.1 Spread Footings 8 7.2 Slabs on Grade 8 8.0 PERMANENT RETAINING STRUCTURES 9 9.0 GROUNDWATER CONSIDERATIONS 9 9.1 Temporary 9 9.2 Surface 9 9.3 Subsurface 10 9.4 Infiltration System 10 10.0 SEISMIC DESIGN CRITERIA 10 1 1.0 PAVEMENT DESIGN RECOMMENDATIONS 11 12.0 INFILTRATION TESTING 11 13.0 OBSERVATION OF CONSTRUCTION 12 14.0 LIMITATIONS 12 FIGURES Vicinity Map Figure 1 Site Plan Figure 2 APPEN DIX Field Explorations A-1 Laboratory Testing A-1 Exploration Key Table A-1 Soil Classification System Table A-2 Boring Logs Figures A-1 -A-2 Summary of Laboratory Data Figure A-3 ACRONYMS G EODESIGN Schwindt&1.01:103111 1.0 INTRODUCTION GeoDesign, Inc. has prepared this geotechnical engineering report for use in design and construction of the proposed dental office located at 11445 SW Summerfield Drive in Tigard, Oregon. The site is currently occupied by a small office structure and associated paved parking and landscaped areas. Figure 1 shows the site relative to existing topographic features. For your reference, definitions of all acronyms used in this report are presented at the end of this document. 2.0 PROJECT UNDERSTANDING Based on preliminary information provided by Mr. Kevin Saxton of Kasa Architects, Inc., it is our understanding that a new single-story,wood-frame dental office is planned for the site. In addition, stormwater infiltration will also be evaluated as part of the proposed site development. Foundation loads were not available at the time of this report; however,we have assumed column loads of less than 50 kips and floor slab loading less than 100 psf. We have assumed that site cuts and fills will be minimal. 3.0 SCOPE OF SERVICES The purpose of our services was to characterize subsurface conditions and provide geotechnical engineering recommendations for use in design and construction of the proposed development. Specifically,we performed the following tasks: • Reviewed readily available published geologic data and our in-house files for existing information on subsurface conditions in the site vicinity. • Coordinated and managed the field investigation, including private and public utility locates, access preparation, and scheduling of contractors and GeoDesign staff. • Completed a subsurface exploration program that consisted of drilling two borings to a depth of up to 25.5 feet BGS. The borings were drilled using hollow-stem auger drilling techniques. Following completion of drilling, each boring was backfilled with bentonite chips and the surface patched with asphalt,where appropriate. • Classified the materials encountered in the explorations and maintained a detailed log of each exploration. • Conducted infiltration testing in both borings. Infiltration testing was conducted at depths of 2 feet BGS in both borings and at a depth of 10 feet BGS in boring B-1. • Completed laboratory analyses on disturbed and undisturbed soil samples obtained from the explorations as follows: • Eleven moisture content and one dry density tests on selected soil samples • Four grain size analysis on selected soil samples • Provided recommendations for site preparation, grading and drainage, stripping depths, fill type for imported materials, compaction criteria, trench excavation and backfill, use of on-site soils, and wet/dry weather earthwork. '-Jr'--'DESIGI' 1 SchwindtB-1-01:103111 • Provided geotechnical engineering recommendations for design and construction of shallow foundations for support of the building. Our recommendations include allowable bearing capacity, estimated settlement, and lateral resistance. • Provided recommendations for preparation of the subgrade for floor slabs. • Recommended design criteria for retaining walls, including lateral earth pressures, backfill, compaction, and drainage. • Provide recommendations for construction of asphalt pavements for on-site access roads and parking areas, including subbase, base course, and asphalt paving thickness. • Provide recommendations for the management of identified groundwater conditions that may affect the performance of structures or pavement. • Provide recommendations for IBC seismic coefficients. • Prepared this report of our explorations, findings, conclusions, and recommendations. 4.0 SITE DESCRIPTION 4.I SURFACE CONDITIONS The site is located immediately northwest of the intersection of SW Durham Road and SW Summerfield Drive in Tigard, Oregon. The site includes a small structure occupied by a real estate agency located within the central portion of the site and is surrounded by a landscaped area, which includes several large trees and a concrete pond. A small asphalt parking area is located north of the existing structure. The site is primarily surrounded by commercial development to the north,west, and south and residential development to the east. Topography of the site slopes upward from north to south across the site with elevations ranging from 186 to 191 feet above MSL. 4.2 SUBSURFACE CONDITIONS We explored site subsurface conditions by drilling two borings (B-1 and B-2)to a maximum depth of approximately 25.5 feet BGS. Figure 2 shows the approximate boring locations. The exploration logs and results of our laboratory testing program are provided in the Appendix. Boring B-1 was completed within the landscaped area on the southeast corner of the site and encountered an approximate 4-inch-thick root zone. Boring B-2 was completed in the asphalt- paved parking lot on the northwest corner of the site and encountered 2.5 inches of AC underlain by 16 inches of base rock. In general, subsurface conditions beneath the root zone and asphalt section consist of silt with varying amounts of sand and clay to the total depths explored of 25.5 feet BGS. The silt is generally stiff to medium stiff in the upper 10.0 to 15.0 feet. It becomes soft to very soft to depths ranging between 15.0 and 22.0 feet BGS. The site was observed to be medium stiff at a depth of 25.0 feet BGS. We observed groundwater at depths on the order of 10 to 12 feet BGS in the borings. The depth to groundwater will fluctuate in response to seasonal changes, changes in topography, irrigation, and other factors not observed in this study. GEODESIGN2 2 SchwindtB-1-01:103111 5.0 CONCLUSIONS Based on our review of available information, the results of our explorations, and the laboratory testing and analyses, it is our opinion that the site can be developed as proposed. Our geotechnical engineering recommendations for use in design and construction of the proposed development are provided in subsequent sections of this report. • The proposed structures can be supported on spread footings bearing on the underlying native silt or on structural fill overlying firm site soils. • The existing structure and concrete pond and trees will be demolished and removed as part of the new development. These areas will require backfill with structural fill. • The site soils are sensitive to moisture and are easily disturbed when at a moisture content that is above optimum. The subgrade should be protected from construction traffic. The following sections present general recommendations based on evaluation of results from geotechnical investigation and our understanding of the proposed project. 6.0 SITE DEVELOPMENT RECOMMENDATIONS 6.1 SITE PREPARATION Demolition includes removal of the existing pavements, concrete curbs, abandoned utilities, and any subsurface elements from previous development. Demolished material should be transported off site for disposal. Excavations remaining from removing basements (if present) foundations, utilities, and other subsurface elements should be backfilled with structural fill where below planned site grades. The bottoms of the excavations should be excavated to expose firm subgrade before filling. The sides of the excavations should be cut into firm material and sloped a minimum of 1%H:1V. Utility lines abandoned under new structural components should be completely removed and backfilled with structural fill. Soft soil encountered in utility line excavations should be removed and replaced with structural fill. The existing root and topsoil zones should be stripped and removed from all proposed structural fill, pavement, and improvement areas and for a 5-foot margin around such areas. Based on the results of our explorations, we observed a 4-inch-thick root zone within the landscaped portion of the site. Greater stripping depths may be required to remove localized zones of loose or organic material during construction. The actual stripping depth should be based on field observations at the time of construction. Stripped material should be transported off site for disposal or used in landscaped areas. Existing trees and shrubs should be removed from all pavement and improvement areas. In addition, root balls should be grubbed out to the depth of the roots,which could exceed 3 feet BGS. Depending on the methods used to remove the root balls, considerable disturbance and loosening of the subgrade could occur during site grubbing. We recommend that soil disturbed during grubbing operations be removed to expose firm, undisturbed subgrade. The resulting excavations should be backfilled with structural fill. G EODESIGN= 3 SchwindtB-1-01:103111 A member of our geotechnical staff should observe all exposed subgrades after stripping and site cutting have been completed to determine if there are areas of unsuitable or unstable soil. Our representative should observe a proofroll with a fully loaded dump truck or similar heavy, rubber- tire construction equipment to identify soft, loose, or unsuitable areas. Areas that appear to be too wet and soft to support proofrolling equipment should be evaluated by probing and prepared in accordance with the recommendations for wet weather construction presented in the"Wet Weather/Wet Soil Grading" section of this report. 6.2 WET WEATHER/WET SOIL GRADING The surficial silty soils at the site are easily disturbed during the wet season and when they are moist. If not carefully executed, site preparation, utility trench work, and roadway excavation can create extensive soft areas and significant subgrade repair costs can result. If construction is planned when the surficial silty soils are wet or may become wet, the construction methods and schedule should be carefully considered with respect to protecting the subgrade to reduce the need to over-excavate disturbed or softened soil. The project budget should reflect the recommendations below if construction is planned during wet weather or when the surficial soils are wet. If construction occurs when silty,wet soils are present, site preparation activities may need to be accomplished using track-mounted excavating equipment that loads removed material into trucks supported on granular haul roads. The thickness of the granular material for haul roads and staging areas will depend on the amount and type of construction traffic. Generally, a 12-to 18-inch-thick mat of imported granular material is sufficient for light staging areas and the basic building pad but is generally not expected to be adequate to support heavy equipment or truck traffic. The granular mat for haul roads and areas with repeated heavy construction traffic typically needs to be increased to between 18 to 24 inches. The actual thickness of haul roads and staging areas should be based on the contractor's approach to site development and the amount and type of construction traffic. The imported granular material should be placed in one lift over the prepared, undisturbed subgrade and compacted using a smooth-drum, non-vibratory roller. In addition, a geotextile fabric should be placed as a barrier between the subgrade and imported granular material in areas of repeated construction traffic. The imported granular material and the geotextile fabric should meet the specifications in the"Structural Fill" section of this report. 6.3 TEMPORARY SLOPES Where construction slopes are possible, excavation side slopes less than 10 feet high should be no steeper than 1 Y2H:1 V, provided groundwater is not present. If slopes greater than 10 feet high are required, GeoDesign should be contacted to make additional recommendations. We recommend a minimum horizontal distance of 5 feet from the edge of the existing improvements to the top of the temporary slope. All cut slopes should be protected from erosion by covering them during wet weather. If sloughing or instability is observed, the slope should be flattened or the cut supported by shoring. Excavations should be made in accordance with applicable OSHA and state regulations. While this report describes certain approaches to excavation and dewatering, the contractor should be G EODESIGN= 4 SchwindtB-1-01:1031 1 1 responsible for selecting excavation and dewatering methods, monitoring the excavations for safety, and providing shoring, as required to protect personnel and adjacent utilities and structures. 6.4 STRUCTURAL FILL Structural fill includes fill beneath foundations, slabs, pavements, any other areas intended to support structures, or within the influence zones of structures. Structural fill should be free of organic matter and other deleterious materials and, in general, should consist of particles no larger than 3 inches in diameter. Recommendations for suitable fill materials are provided in the following sections. 6.4.1 On-site Soil The on-site native soils will be suitable for use as structural fill only if they can be moisture conditioned. Based on our experience, the on-site silty soils are sensitive to small changes in moisture content and may be difficult to compact adequately during wet weather or when their moisture content is more than a few percentage points above optimum. If the aggregate base beneath the pavement can effectively be separated from the underlying silt, it will be suitable for use as structural fill. 6.4.2 Select Granular Fill Granular material for use as structural fill should be pit- or quarry-run rock, crushed rock, or crushed gravel and sand that is fairly well graded between coarse and fine and has less than 5 percent by dry weight passing the U.S.Standard No. 200 Sieve. Granular fill used during periods of prolonged dry weather may have up to 10 percent passing the U.S. Standard No. 200 Sieve, provided it is properly moisture conditioned. 6.4.3 Pipe Bedding Utility trench backfill for bedding and in the pipe zone should consist of well-graded granular material with a maximum particle size of% inch and less than 5 percent by dry weight passing the U.S. Standard No. 200 Sieve or as required by the pipe manufacturer. 6.4.4 Crushed Rock Crushed rock will be required as base material for floor slabs and pavements as specified. Crushed rock fill should consist of imported clean, durable, crushed, angular rock that meets the requirements of the pertinent sections of this report. 6.5 FILL PLACEMENT AND COMPACTION Fill soils should be compacted at a moisture content that is near optimum. The maximum allowable moisture content varies with the soil gradation and should be evaluated during construction. Fill and backfill material should be placed in uniform, horizontal lifts and compacted with appropriate equipment. The maximum lift thickness will vary depending on the material and G EO DESIGN= s SchwindtB-1-01:1031 1 1 compaction equipment used but should generally not exceed the loose thicknesses provided in Table 1. Fill material should be compacted in accordance with the compaction criteria provided in Table 2. Table 1. Recommended Uncompacted Lift Thickness Recommended Uncompacted Lift Thickness (inches) Compaction Equipment Granular and Crushed Crushed Rock Silty Soils Rock Maximum Maximum Particle Particle Size<_ 1%:inches Size > 1Y2 inches Hand Tools: Plate Compactors and 4 to 8 4 to 8 Not Recommended Jumping Jacks Rubber-Tire Equipment 6 to 8 10 to 12 6 to 8 Light Roller 8 to 10 10 to 12 8 to 10 Heavy Roller 10 to 12 12 to 18 12 to 16 Hoe Pack Equipment 12 to 16 18 to 24 12 to 16 Table 1 is based on our experience and is intended to serve only as a guideline. The information provided in this table should not be included in the project specifications. Table 2. Compaction Criteria Compaction Requirements in Structural Zones Percent Maximum Dry Density Fill Type Determined by ASTM D 1557 0 to 2 Feet Below > 2 Feet Below Pipe Zone Subgrade Subgrade (percent) (percent) (percent) Area Fill 95' 92 Aggregate Bases 95 95 _ Trench Backfill 95' 92 902 Retaining Wall Backfill 95'3 923 1. May be reduced to 92 percent if native soils are used. 2. Or as recommended by the pipe manufacturer. 3. Should be reduced to 90 percent within a horizontal distance of 3 feet from the retaining wall. 6.5.1 Area Fills Imported fill placed to raise site grades should be placed on a prepared subgrade that consists of firm, inorganic site soils or compacted fill. The fill material should be placed in uniform horizontal lifts and compacted to the recommended minimum density provided in Table 2. �i EO DESIGN? 6 SchwindtB-1-01:1031 11 6.5.2 Aggregate Bases Aggregate base materials under foundations and floor slabs should be placed on a prepared subgrade that consists of firm, inorganic, native soils or compacted fill. Aggregate base material should be placed in uniform horizontal lifts and compacted to the recommended minimum density provided in Table 2. 6.5.3 Trench Backfill Trench backfill in structural areas should consist of select granular fill or crushed rock as described in the"Structural Fill" section of this report and be compacted to the minimum density provided in Table 2. Pipe bedding and fill in the pipe zone should be compacted to the minimum density presented in Table 2 or as recommended by the pipe manufacturer. 6.5.4 Retaining Wall Backfill Retaining wall backfill should be compacted to the recommended minimum density provided in Table 2, except that fill within 3 horizontal feet of the wall should be placed in uniform horizontal lifts and compacted to a lesser density of 90 percent of the maximum density as determined by ASTM D 1 557 to reduce the effect of compaction-induced stresses against the retaining wall. Settlement of up to 1 percent of the wall height commonly occurs immediately adjacent to retaining walls as the walls rotate and develop lateral active earth pressures. Consequently, we recommend that flatwork(slabs, sidewalks, or pavement) placed adjacent to retaining walls be postponed at least four weeks following wall construction, unless survey data indicates that settlement is complete prior to that time. 6.6 PERMANENT CUT AND FILL SLOPES Permanent cut and fill slopes in the site soils should be inclined no steeper than 2H:1 V. Buildings, access roads, and pavements should be set back a minimum of 5 feet from the crest of any such slopes. 6.7 EROSION CONTROL The on-site soils are moderately susceptible to erosion. Consequently,we recommend that slopes be covered with an appropriate erosion control product if construction occurs during periods of wet weather. We recommend that all slope surfaces be planted as soon as practical to minimize erosion. Surface water runoff should be collected and directed away from slopes to prevent water from running down the slope face. Erosion control measures such as straw bales, sediment fences, and temporary detention and settling basins should be used in accordance with local and state ordinances. 7.0 FOUNDATION SUPPORT RECOMMENDATIONS Based on the results of our subsurface exploration program and geotechnical analysis, the planned structure may be supported by continuous wall and isolated column footings founded on the underlying native medium stiff to very stiff silt or on structural fill overlying firm site soils. Our recommendations for use in foundation design and construction are provided in the following sections. G EO DESIGN= 7 SchwindtB-1-01:103111 7.1 SPREAD FOOTINGS 7.1.1 Bearing Capacity All footings should be proportioned for a maximum allowable soil bearing pressure of 2,500 psf. This bearing pressure is a net bearing pressure and applies to the total of dead and long-term live loads and may be increased by 50 percent when considering seismic or wind loads. The weight of the footing and any overlying backfill can be ignored in calculating footing loads. We recommend that isolated column and continuous wall footings have minimum widths of 24 and 18 inches, respectively. The bottom of exterior footings should be founded at least 18 inches below the lowest adjacent grade. Interior footings should be founded at least 12 inches below the top of the floor slab. The recommended minimum footing depth is greater than the anticipated frost depth. We recommend that a qualified geotechnical engineer or geotechnical field technician evaluate all footing subgrades prior to construction of forms or placement of reinforcing steel and concrete. We recommend that 2 to 4 inches of compacted crushed rock be placed over the exposed subgrade to reduce disturbance to the silty subgrade soils during construction of forms and placement of reinforcing steel if construction occurs during wet weather. 7.1.2 Lateral Resistance Lateral loads can be resisted by passive earth pressure on sides of the footings and by friction on the base of the footings. We recommend a friction coefficient of 0.45 for computing the friction capacity of building foundations that bear on the gravel fill or compacted crushed rock and 0.35 for footings bearing on the native soils. An equivalent fluid unit weight of 350 pcf is recommended to compute passive earth pressure acting on footings constructed in direct contact with compacted structural fill or native soils. This value is based on the assumptions that the adjacent confining structural fill or native soils are level and that groundwater remains below the base of the footing. The top 1 foot of soil should be neglected when calculating lateral earth pressures unless the foundation area is covered with pavement or is inside a building. 7.1.3 Settlement Shallow foundations with real bearing pressures less than 2,500 psf should experience post- construction settlements of less than 1 inch. Differential settlements of up to one-half of the total settlement magnitude can be expected between adjacent footings with similar loads. We expect that settlement will occur during construction as loads are applied. 7.2 SLABS ON GRADE A modulus of subgrade reaction of 120 pci can be used for design of the floor slabs provided the subgrade is prepared in accordance with the recommendations presented in this section. The native soils are non-expansive, so heave is not anticipated beneath the floor slab. We recommend that the floor slab be supported on at least 6 inches of imported granular material to aid as a capillary break and to provide uniform support. The imported granular material should be placed and compacted as previously recommended for aggregate bases. G EO DESIG Ny 8 SchwindtB-1-01:1031 1 1 Vapor barriers beneath floor slabs are typically required by flooring manufactures to maintain the warranty on their products. In our experience, adequate performance of floor adhesives can be achieved by using a clean base rock(less than 5 percent fines) beneath the floor slab with no vapor barrier. In fact,vapor barriers can frequently cause moisture problems by trapping water beneath the floor slab that is introduced during construction. If a vapor barrier is used,water should not be applied to the base rock prior to pouring the slab and the work should be completed during extended dry weather so that rainfall is not trapped on top of the vapor barrier. Selection and design of an appropriate vapor barrier, if needed, should be based on discussions among members of the design team. We can provide additional information to assist you with your decision. 8.0 PERMANENT RETAINING STRUCTURES Permanent retaining structures free to rotate slightly around the base should be designed for active earth pressures using an equivalent fluid unit weight of 35 pcf. This value is based on the assumption that(1) the walls will not be restrained against rotation, (2)the backfill is level, (3) the backfill consists of granular material, (4)the backfill is drained, and (5)the wall is less than 10 feet in height. If retaining walls are restrained against rotation during backfilling, they should be designed for an at-rest earth pressure of 55 pcf. Seismic lateral forces can be calculated using a dynamic force equal to 6.5 H2 pounds per linear foot of wall,where H is the wall height. The seismic force should be applied as a distributed load with the centroid located at 0.6H from the wall base. Footings for retaining wall should be designed in as recommended for shallow foundations. Drains consisting of a perforated drainpipe wrapped in a geotextile filter should be installed behind exterior walls. The pipe should be embedded in a zone of coarse sand or gravel containing less than 2 percent by dry weight passing the U.S. Standard No. 200 Sieve and should outlet to a suitable discharge. 9.0 GROUNDWATER CONSIDERATIONS 9.1 TEMPORARY During grading at the site, the contractor should be made responsible for temporary drainage of surface water as necessary to prevent standing water and/or erosion at the working surface. During rough and finished grading of the building site, the contractor should keep all footing excavations and building pads free of water. 9.2 SURFACE The finished ground surface around structures should be sloped away from their foundations at a minimum 2 percent gradient for a distance of at least 5 feet. Downspouts or roof scuppers should discharge into a storm drain system that that carries the collected water to an appropriate stormwater system. Trapped planter areas should not be created adjacent to structures without providing means for positive drainage(i.e., swales or catch basins). CEO DESIGN? g SchwindtB-1-01:103111 9.3 SUBSURFACE Due to the shallow depth to groundwater at the site, we recommend that footing drains be installed. Footing drains should consist of a filter fabric-wrapped, drain rock-filled trench that extends at least 12 inches below the lowest adjacent grade(i.e., slab subgrade elevation). A perforated pipe should be placed at the base to collect water that gathers in the drain rock. The drain rock and filter fabric should meet the specifications outlined in the "Structural Fill"section of this report. The discharge for the footing drain should not be tied directly into the stormwater drainage system, unless mechanisms are installed to prevent backflow. 9.4 INFILTRATION SYSTEM Infiltration values are provided in the"Infiltration Testing"section of this report. The values have been factored to account for potential site variability and the limited number of tests performed but has not been factored for design. This value should be factored by the civil designer during design to account for the system size, the degree of long-term maintenance and influent/pre- treatment control, as well as the potential for long-term clogging due to siltation and bio-buildup, depending on the proposed length, location, and type of use of infiltration facility. 10.0 SEISMIC DESIGN CRITERIA Seismic design is prescribed by the 2010 SOSSC and the 2009 IBC. Table 3 presents the site design parameters prescribed by the 2009 IBC for the site. Table 3. IBC Seismic Design Parameters Parameter Short Period 1 Second Period (T,=0.2 second) (T, = 1.0 second) Maximum Considered Earthquake SS= 0.92 g S = 0.33 g Spectral Acceleration, S Site Class D Site Coefficient, F F = 1.134 Fs,- 1.735 Adjusted Spectral Acceleration,S. SMS= 1.04 g SM1 = 0.58 g Design Spectral Response Sys=0.69 g Sp =0.39 g Acceleration Parameters, So Design Peak Ground Acceleration, S.. 0.28 g Liquefaction is caused by a rapid increase in pore water pressure that reduces the effective stress between soil particles to near zero. Granular soils,which rely on interparticle friction for strength, are susceptible to liquefaction until the excess pore pressures can dissipate. In general, loose, saturated sand soils with low silt and clay contents are the most susceptible to liquefaction. Silty soils with low plasticity are moderately susceptible to liquefaction under relatively higher levels of ground shaking. Based on our experience in the site vicinity, the risk of liquefaction under design levels of ground shaking is considered low. G EODESIGN= 10 Schwindt6-1.01:1031 11 11.0 PAVEMENT DESIGN RECOMMENDATIONS The pavement subgrade should be prepared in accordance with the previously described site preparation, construction considerations, and structural fill recommendations. Our pavement recommendations assume that traffic at the site will consist of light-weight passenger vehicles and delivery trucks. Our pavement recommendations are based on an assumed California bearing ratio value of 3 for the pavement subgrade and a design life of 20 years. In access roadways and areas trafficked by trucks, we recommend a pavement section consisting of a minimum of 3.5 inches of AC pavement underlain by a minimum of 10.0 inches of crushed base rock. A pavement section of 2.5 inches of AC over 8.0 inches of aggregate base can be used in paved areas that will be exposed to passenger car traffic only. In addition,we recommend that a geotextile separation layer be placed on the subgrade and under the crushed rock base in access and truck traffic areas to prevent migration of the silt up into the base course. The geotextile should meet the requirements previously presented. The AC should be Level 2, 1/2-inch, dense HMAC according to OSSC 00745 (Hot Mixed Asphalt Concrete) and compacted to 91 percent of maximum specific gravity of the mix, as determined by ASTM D 2041. Minimum lift thickness for'A-inch HMAC is 2.0 inches. Asphalt binder should be performance graded and conform to PG 64-22. The base rock should meet the specifications for aggregate base rock provided in the"Structural Fill" section of this report. The pavement subgrade should be prepared in accordance with the"Site Preparation"and "Structural Fill" sections of this report. The top 12 inches of subgrade below the pavement should be compacted to at least 92 percent of the maximum dry density, as determined by ASTM D 1557, or until proofrolling with a fully loaded dump or water truck indicates an unyielding, non-pumping subgrade is present. Construction traffic should be limited to non-building, unpaved portions of the site or haul roads. Construction traffic should not be allowed on new pavements. If construction traffic is to be allowed on newly constructed road sections, an allowance for this additional traffic will need to be made in the design pavement section. 12.0 INFILTRATION TESTING Infiltration tests were conducted in borings B-1 and B-2 located on the northwestern and southeastern areas of the site. Infiltration testing was conducted in general accordance with the City of Portland Bureau of Environmental Services Stormwater Management Manual (revised February 1, 2010). Table 4 presents a summary of infiltration test results and fines content determinations. The exploration logs and particle-size analyses are presented in the Appendix. G EO DESIGN= 11 SchwindtB-1-01:10311 1 Table 4. Infiltration Test Results Depth Observed Fines Content' Exploration (feet BGS) Infiltration Rate (percent) (inches/hour) B-1 2 2.9 70 B-1 10 2.2 66 B-2 2 6 62 1. Fines content: material passing the U.S.Standard No.200 Sieve The infiltration rates provided in table above are measured rates and are unfactored. Correction factors should be applied to the measured infiltration rates by the civil engineer during design to account for the degree of long-term maintenance and influent/pre-treatment control, as well as the potential for long-term clogging due to siltation and buildup of organic material, depending on the proposed length, location, and type of infiltration facility. We recommend GeoDesign be retained to observe the installation of the infiltration system and confirm that subsurface conditions are consistent with those encountered during our explorations. If the stormwater infiltration system does not have a redundant overflow system,we also recommend GeoDesign conduct confirmation infiltration testing at the base of the proposed system. 13.0 OBSERVATION OF CONSTRUCTION Satisfactory earthwork and foundation performance depends to a large degree on the quality of construction. Subsurface conditions observed during construction should be compared with those encountered during the subsurface explorations. Recognition of changed conditions often requires experience; therefore, qualified personnel should visit the site with sufficient frequency to detect whether subsurface conditions change significantly from those anticipated. In addition, sufficient observation of the contractor's activities is a key part of determining that the work is completed in accordance with the construction drawings and specifications. 14.0 LIMITATIONS We have prepared this report for use by the Dr. Brandon Schwindt, DMD, PC and his consultants. The data and report can be used for estimating purposes, but our report, conclusions, and interpretations should not be construed as a warranty of the subsurface conditions and are not applicable to other sites. Soil explorations indicate soil conditions only at specific locations and only to the depths penetrated. They do not necessarily reflect soil strata or water level variations that may exist between exploration locations. If subsurface conditions differing from those described are noted during the course of excavation and construction, re-evaluation will be necessary. The site development plans and design details were not finalized at the time this report was prepared. When the design has been finalized and if there are changes in the site grades or EO DESIGN= 12 SchwindtB-1.01:10311 1 location, configuration, design loads or type of construction for the buildings, the conclusions and recommendations presented may not be applicable. If design changes are made,we should be retained to review our conclusions and recommendations and to provide a written evaluation or modification. The scope of our services does not include services related to construction safety precautions, and our recommendations are not intended to direct the contractor's methods, techniques, sequences or procedures, except as specifically described in our report for consideration in design. Within the limitations of scope, schedule, and budget, our services have been executed in accordance with the generally accepted practices in this area at the time this report was prepared. No warranty or other conditions, express or implied, should be understood. � ♦ ♦ We appreciate the opportunity to be of continued service to you. Please call if you have questions concerning this report or if we can provide additional services. Sincerely, GeoDesign, Inc. 73 RP jj, OR.ViON cia C. Miller, P.E., G.E. C. Senior A sociate Engineer F.• 12_31,271 Brett •. S i• :i n, .,G.E. Principal Engineer G EO DESIGN= 13 SchwindtB-1-01:1031 1 1 FIGURES , :'ten" ` "," }�. r _.r• .M.J� ' # •/ 5' .-x '� ;:;'l '�^im. -e w• * • .'* R.'v• �'I ��•r r^ ..• t .1? �'� Z• 't>4.' - • - ., ti,.:. "r r: !�fi+f? I'. •.�r•' yy' •tea +. r •a. x ` , rev 1. a..; • c^4'tr.. ■ A ' ' h 7.!h - - •^ .• Wit: !.f.r . • • .yam ' • _ ••••i x- , . :' - SITE ., *• 42-3 44: LLB-' • 4^ +.. 1 .) ,...;1. _ 1., C f. • T :t- 'rte• a., 4.. •.N•.a ,, N a m �.. N • O / • c VICINITY MAP BASED ON AERIAL '- � " •` 'A . ; rf 2000 4000 PHOTOGRAPH OBTAINED FROM ...'•••• GOGGLE EARTH PRO® (SCALE IN APPROXIMATE FEET) v 0 ■ • i a -. ■ a . °J ---- ------ --- ----------.-- ---- -- - -------- 'PI % G EODESIGN? SCHWINDTB-1 01 VICINITY MAP E 15575 Sequoia Parkway-Suite 100 d Z Portland OCTOBER 2011 SCHWINDT DENTAL OFFICE FIGURE 1 w Off 503 968 8787 Fax 503.968.3068 TIGARD,OR x DEED RECORDS RIM- 3 _——— fE IN r� 4 w N _ — E LEGEND: `s'0 re ■ —..25-_1/4H MTggST--q��---�_— \ --- g B10 BORING V & !80.39 W h� n -- -__ ----B..S� f£!N� t — L.T. 7 IE(N.180.52 5 I – g" SS _____ — IEOUTa179.9�ES5 — — — ------- I-1 \ / G/ul Al.I_ PC -- _ ——— — — —PROPERTY LINE �� HELD N � ASPHA, \CC \ SURFA, ASPHALT K 5. - l/ o SURFACE I ^SW I CC - —_"_ __.-✓_, -\ S�,Q�A o Z oo \y I�. ✓ `�9Sq`Sp z 1 F C 1 w a \ s� F4,r •S• w / SURFACE / SURFACE / W d 0&2 / / /G i i- CC CC / y�\ \ \ CSW \ CSW CONCRETE _ 1 STAIRS / / „�, L � \.. .i — I r 7.3 . r ✓ 1 / �,R R���� C�IJ 7 T�71 / �1 c5 G V 5/5"0.0..,e I � 0 I / 1 1445 5W /I PARKING I JO 1.EG�g2 �I / SUMDRIVEE� //�q .I SIGN O 0 `i 5 CONCRETE POND 1,/ I STORY BUILDING 1 8 3' —FILLED WITH ROCKS GM WITH DECK /3r ' 41 /r SIDEWALK 9 ��� // \ /J_��� ,�_J i I ENCROACH T o - O Q" �' 0 I (SEE NOTE 6 Z �� 2.50 3 i C MONUMENT VI s / l� `� _ \SIGN I/ PROPOSED 2.5' Cti e"iQ / 'O� �� I' SIDEWALK EASEMENT OTL iy/R.o 1 — . — I eC/B4`c'�c /,9 r U \ \ Io �L TJ8 -- -- \ `8.10 / UI �` — — — / PROPERTY�NE zo.o \ • J IGN \■/ QrP\POE N -" CSW �y CSW TJB •se, 5 Z ��—---- -- —' r Gy C u ��r Ns:s o 5- - - ---- — I- -- 0 20 40 l.V S E° 3 SW DURHAM ROAD 1 013,4 3' c ASPHALT (SCALE IN FEET) ; e A 6 2-G I SITE PLAN BASED ON DRAWING PROVIDED BY _i KSA ARCHITECTS,OCTOBER 201 I I APPENDIX APPENDIX FIELD EXPLORATIONS GENERAL We explored subsurface conditions in the project area by drilling two borings (B-1 and B-2) to a maximum depth of 25.5 feet BGS. Figure 2 shows the approximate exploration locations. The borings were drilled on October 10, 2011 by Dan J. Fischer Excavation, Inc. of Forest Grove, Oregon. The exploration locations were located in the field pacing from survey existing site features. This information should be considered accurate only to the degree implied by the methods used. A member of our geotechnical staff observed the explorations. We obtained representative samples of the various soils encountered in the explorations for geotechnical laboratory testing. Classifications and sampling intervals are shown in the exploration logs included in this appendix. SOIL SAMPLING Soil samples were obtained from the borings using the following method: • Standard penetration tests were performed in general conformance with ASTM D 1586. The sampler was driven with a 140-pound automatic trip hammer free-falling 30 inches. The number of blows required to drive the sampler 1 foot, or as otherwise indicated, into the soils is shown adjacent to the sample symbols on the exploration logs. Disturbed samples were obtained from the split barrel for subsequent classification and index testing. SOIL CLASSIFICATION The soil samples were classified in accordance with the"Exploration Key"(Table A-1)and"Soil Classification System"(Table A-2),which are included in this appendix. The exploration logs indicate the depths at which the soils or their characteristics change, although the change actually could be gradual. If the change occurred between sample locations, the depth was interpreted. Classifications and sampling intervals are shown in the exploration logs included in this appendix. LABORATORY TESTING CLASSIFICATION The soil samples were classified in the laboratory to confirm field classifications. The laboratory classifications are included on the exploration logs if those classifications differed from the field classifications. G EODESIGN? A-1 SchwindtB-1-01:1031 1 1 MOISTURE CONTENT We tested the natural moisture content of selected samples obtained from the explorations in general accordance with ASTM D 2216. The natural moisture content is a ratio of the weight of the water to soil in a test sample and is expressed as a percentage. The moisture contents are included on the exploration logs presented in this appendix. GRAIN-SIZE TESTING Grain-size testing was completed on four selected sample. The results of the grain-size testing are included on the exploration logs presented in this appendix. G EO DESIG N? A-2 SchwindtB-1-01:103111 SYMBOL SAMPLING DESCRIPTION II Location of sample obtained in general accordance with ASTM D 1586 Standard Penetration Test with recovery II Location of sample obtained using thin-wall Shelby tube or Geoprobe® sampler in general accordance with ASTM D 1587 with recovery N Location of sample obtained using Dames & Moore sampler and 300-pound hammer or pushed with recovery N Location of sample obtained using Dames & Moore and 140-pound hammer or pushed with recovery N Location of sample obtained using 3-inch-O.D. California split-spoon sampler and 140-pound hammer NLocation of grab sample Graphic Log of Soil and Rock Types .�•;'. Observed contact between soil or 1 Rock coring interval • ,? rock units(at depth indicated) Illrrr Water level during drilling Inferred contact between soil or rock units (at approximate depths indicated) T Water level taken on date shown -' —- GEOTECHNICAL TESTING EXPLANATIONS ATT Atterberg Limits PP Pocket Penetrometer CBR California Bearing Ratio P200 Percent Passing U.S. Standard No. 200 CON Consolidation Sieve DD Dry Density RES Resilient Modulus DS Direct Shear SIEV Sieve Gradation HYD Hydrometer Gradation TOR Torvane MC Moisture Content UC Unconfined Compressive Strength MD Moisture-Density Relationship VS Vane Shear OC Organic Content kPa Kilopascal P Pushed Sample ENVIRONMENTAL TESTING EXPLANATIONS CA Sample Submitted for Chemical Analysis ND Not Detected P Pushed Sample NS No Visible Sheen PID Photoionization Detector Headspace SS Slight Sheen Analysis MS Moderate Sheen ppm Parts per Million HS Heavy Sheen G EO DESIGN? EXPLORATION KEY TABLE A-1 15575 SW Sequow Parkway-Surte 100 Portland OR 97224 Off 503.968.8787 Fax 503.968.3068 RELATIVE DENSITY-COARSE-GRAINED SOILS Relative Density Standard Penetration Dames&Moore Sampler Dames&Moore Sampler Resistance (140-pound hammer) (300-pound hammer) Very Loose 0-4 0- 11 0-4 Loose 4- 10 11 - 26 4- 10 Medium Dense 10- 30 26- 74 10- 30 Dense 30- 50 74- 120 30-47 Very Dense More than 50 More than 120 More than 47 CONSISTENCY- FINE-GRAINED SOILS Consistency Standard Penetration Dames&Moore Sampler Dames& Moore Sampler Unconfined Compressive Resistance (140-pound hammer) (300-pound hammer) Strength(tsf) Very Soft _ Less than 2 Less than 3 Less than 2 Less than 0.25 Soft 2 -4 3 -6 2 - 5 0.25 -0.50 Medium Stiff 4-8 6- 12 5 - 9 0.50- 1.0 Stiff 8- 15 12 -25 9- 19 1.0-2.0 Very Stiff 15 - 30 25 -65 19- 31 2.0-4.0 Hard i More than 30 More than 65 More than 31 More than 4.0 PRIMARY SOIL DIVISIONS GROUP SYMBOL GROUP NAME CLEAN GRAVELS GW or GP GRAVEL GRAVEL (< 5%fines) (more than 50%of GRAVEL WITH FINES GW-GM or GP-GM GRAVEL with silt coarse raction (> 5%and s 12%fines) GW-GC or GP-GC GRAVEL with clay COARSE GRAINED retained on GRAVELS WITH FINES GM silty GRAVEL No. 4 sieve) GC clayey GRAVEL SOILS (> 12%fines) y Y GC-GM silty, clayey GRAVEL (more than 50% CLEAN SANDS retained on SAND (<5%fines) SW or SP SAND No. 200 sieve) (50%or more of SANDS WITH FINES _ SW-SM or SP-SM SAND with silt co or mor (z 5%and s 12%fines) SW-SC or SP-SC SAND with clay passing SM silty SAND SANDS WITH FINES No. 4 sieve) SC clayey SAND (> 12%fines) SC-SM silty, clayey SAND ML SILT FINE-GRAINED CL CLAY SOILS Liquid limit less than 50 CL-ML silty CLAY _ (50%or more SILT AND CLAY OL ORGANIC SILT or ORGANIC CLAY passing MH SILT No. 200 sieve) Liquid limit 50 or CH CLAY greater OH ORGANIC SILT or ORGANIC CLAY HIGHLY ORGANIC SOILS PT PEAT MOISTURE ADDITIONAL CONSTITUENTS CLASSIFICATION Secondary granular components or other materials Term Field Test such as organics,man-made debris,etc. Silt and Clay In: Sand and Gravel In: very low moisture, Percent Fine-Grained Coarse- Percent Fine-Grained Coarse- dry dry to touch Soils Grained Soils Soils Grained Soils moist damp,without < 5 trace trace < 5 trace trace visible moisture 5 - 12 minor with 5 - 15 minor minor wet visible free water, > 12 some silty/clayey 15 - 30 with with usually saturated > 30 sandy/gravelly sandy/gravelly G Eo DESIGN= SOIL CLASSIFICATION SYSTEM TABLE A-2 15575 SW Sequoia Parkway-Sune 100 Portland OR 97224 Off 503.968.8787 Fax 503.968.3068 Z o - Z J •BLOW COUNT INSTALLATION AND DEPTH u <0- a •MOISTURE CONTENT% COMMENTS = MATERIAL DESCRIPTION >w g FEET a I11 0 w < ®RQD% 177]CORE REC% H V 188.5 0 50 100 —0.0 Stiff, brown mottled orange/black SILT (ML), minor clay and sand,trace organics; dry to moist, low plasticity(4- inch-thick root zone). 2.5— P200 10 P200-70% 5.0— - becomes brown,with sand, trace clay; moist at 6.0 feet A 7.5 becomes sandy at 7.5 feet becomes medium stiff, brown, some 7 _ clay, minor sand; medium plasticity at A • 8.0 feet lo.o— becomes light brown, sandy at 10.0 feet - g y 8 P200-66% P200 A • 12.5- becomes soft; wet at 12.0 feet U ■, Groundwater estimated at 12.0 to 16.0 feet 1 5.0— 1 7.5— _ Very soft to soft, brown, sandy SILT 19.0 zo.o— (ML),trace clay; wet, non plastic to low plasticity, rapid dilatancy. 2 P200=52% P200 A • I- . 22.5— p I- F becomes medium stiff at 24.0 feet Fe zs.o— A 163.0 Exploration completed at a depth of 25.5 U 25.5 feet. z u - a 27.5— 0 W V _ a u _ ▪ 30.0 0 50 100 au DRILLED BY:Dan J.Fischer Excavating.Inc. LOGGED BY.CLR COMPLETED:10/10/11 z = BORING METHOD:hollow-stem auger(see report text) BORING BIT DIAMETER'3.5-inch .■ z GEODESIGN? SCHWINDTB-1-01 BORING B-1 m▪ 15575 SW Sequoia Parkway-suite 100 SCHWINDT DENTAL OFFICE 224 Portland OR 97224 OCTOBER 2011 FIGURE A-1 Off 503.968.8787 Fax 503.968.3068 TIGARD,OR z o -0 1 L1 w •BLOW COUNT INSTALLATION AND H z -j COMMENTS DFEETH d MATERIAL DESCRIPTION j o — •MOISTURE CONTENT% w < ®RQD% CORE REC% w —0.0 U 186.5 0 50 100 o1Z\ASPHALT CONCRETE(2.5 inches). '0.2 _'?;61f AGGREGATE BASE(16 inches). ° cS 185.0 Stiff, brown mottled black SILT with 1.5 z s— sand (ML),trace clay; moist, low to P200=62% plasticity. P200 • • becomes medium stiff, brown, sandy at 5.0— 4.0 feet • Es • 7.5 becomes wet at 7.5 feet 1 r • 10.0— Groundwater estimated at 10.0 feet Soft, brown and gray SILT with sand 11.5 z s— (ML), minor clay; wet, medium plasticity, 4 rapid dilatancy. • 15.0— feet becomes medium stiff, sandy at 16.0 - 18 inches of heave 17.5— 20.0 166.5 Exploration completed at a depth of 20.0 20.0 feet. I- Y 22.5— O • f- z 2 25.0-- 1 I- 0 L z 0 27.5- 0 w u _ N 30.0 0 50 100 0 DRILLED BY:Dan J.Fischer Excavating,Inc. LOGGED BY:CLR COMPLETED:10/10/11 z = BORING METHOD:hollow-stem auger(see report text) BORING BIT DIAMETER:3.5-inch u GEODESIGN. SCHWINDTB-1-01 BORING B-2 15575 SW Sequoia Parkway-Suite 100 SCHWINDT DENTAL OFFICE FIGURE A-2 m Portland OR 97224 OCTOBER 2011 Off 503.968.8787 Fax 503.968.3068 TIGARD,OR SAMPLE INFORMATION SIEVE ATTERBERG LIMITS MOISTURE DRY EXPLORATION SAMPLE ELEVATION CONTENT DENSITY GRAVEL SAND P200 LIQUID PLASTIC PLASTICITY NUMBER DEPTH (FEET) (PERCENT) (PCF) (PERCENT) (PERCENT) (PERCENT) LIMIT LIMIT INDEX (FEET) (PERCENT) (PERCENT) (PERCENT) B-1 2.0 186.5 14 70 B-1 4.0 184.5 23 B-1 8.0 180.5 27 B-1 10.0 178.5 33 66 B-1 16.0 172.5 26 B-1 20.0 168.5 34 52 B-1 24.0 164.5 33 B-2 2.0 184.5 29 62 B-2 4.0 182.5 29 B-2 8.0 178.5 38 B-2 12.0 174.5 34 Z 0- a I— u i u VN 0 0 W u 0 u N co t— O Z x G EODESIGN? SCHWINDTB-1-01 SUMMARY OF LABORATORY DATA E 15575 SW Sequoia Parkway Suite 100 OCTOBER 201 1 SCHWINDT DENTAL OFFICE FIGURE A-3 Portland OR 97224 Off 503.968.8787 Fax 503.968.3068 TIGARD,OR ACRONYMS ACRONYMS AC asphalt concrete ASTM American Society for Testing and Materials BGS below ground surface g gravitational acceleration (32.2 feet/second') H:V horizontal to vertical HMAC hot mixed asphalt concrete IBC International Building Code MSL mean sea level OSHA Occupational Safety and Health Administration OSSC Oregon Standard Specifications for Construction (2008) pcf pounds per cubic foot pci pounds per cubic inch psf pounds per square foot SOSSC State of Oregon Structural Specialty Code G EO DESlGN? SchwindtB-1-01:1031 11 Acus I in3 e‘8)est :' • CITY OF TIGARD COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT PLANNING DIVISION 13125 SW HALL BOULEVARD II TIGARD, OREGON 97223 PHONE: 503-639-4171 FAX: 503-718-2748 (Attn: Patty/Planning) EMAIL: patty@tigard-or.gov I I G A RD REQUEST FOR 500-FOOT PROPERTY OWNER MAILING LIST Property owner information is valid for 3 months from the date of your.request INDICATE ALL PROJECT MAP&TAX LOT NUMBERS (i.e. 1S134AB,Tax Lot 00100) OR THE ADDRESSES FOR ALL PROJECT PARCELS BELOW: (If more than I tax lot or if the parcel has no address,you must separately identify each tax lot associated with the project.) 11445 SW Summerfield Drive 2S110DC00500 & 01300 PLEASE BE AWARE THAT ONLY 1 SET OF LABELS WILL BE PROVIDED AT THIS TIME FOR HOLDING YOUR NEIGHBORHOOD MEETING. After submitting your land use application to the City, and the project planner has reviewed your application for completeness, you will be notified by means of an incompleteness letter to obtain your 2 final sets of labels. IF YOU HAVE BEEN NOTIFIED BY PLANNING TO OBTAIN YOUR LABELS. PLEASE INDICATE BELOW THAT YOU NEED 2 SETS OF LABELS. © Completeness Letter Received Indicating 2 Sets of Envelopes w/Affixed Address Labels Required The 2 final sets of labels need to be placed on envelopes (no self-adhesive envelopes please) with first class letter- rate jpostage on the envelopes in the form of postage stamps (no metered envelopes and no return address) and resubmitted to the City for the purpose of providing;notice to property owners of the proposed land use application and the decision. The 2 sets of envelopes must he kept separate. The person listed below will be called to pick up and pay for the labels when they are ready. NAME OF CONTACT PERSON:Kevin Saxton PHONE: .L503.284.6917 NAME OF COMPANY: KASA architects FAX: L503.284.6917 EMAIL: ksaxton @kasapdx.com This request may be emailed, mailed, faxed, or hand delivered to the City of Tigard. Please allow a 2-day minimum for processing requests. Upon completion of your request, the contact person listed will be called to pick up their request that will be placed in "Will Call" by the company name (or by the contact person's last name if no company) at the Planning/Engineering Counter at the Permit Center. The cost of processing your request must be paid at the time of pick up,as exact cost can not he pre-determined. PLEASE NOTE: FOR REASONS OF ACCURACY, ONLY ORIGINAL MAILING LABELS PROVIDED BY THE CITY VS. RE-TYPED MAILING LABELS WILL BE ACCEPTED. Cost Description: $11 to generate the mailing list,plus $2 per sheet for printing the list onto labels (20 addresses per sheet). Then,multiply the cost to print one set of labels by the number of sets requested. -EXAMPLE- - COST FOR THIS REQUEST- 4 sheets of labels x$2/sheet 18.00 x 2 sets= $16.01) I_sheet(s)of labels x$2/sheet=$ sets= j J.sheets of labels x$2/sheet for interested parties x 2 sets— $ 4.00 sheet(s)of labels x$2/sheet for interested parties=1 x_%sets= --. -- . — GENERATE J.ISl'= $11,0 --. _-__--_ GENERATE LIST $11.00 TOTAI. _ $31.00 TOTAL. =$ / -... ■ L— ° O ° `i a O' ROy'Cry PK'� 8 #44„ � � e A. ESE e ° g g Area Notified (500 Ft).N BEBE A e g mg=° o • KEVIN SAXTON ,•, ''. \ \\ ���8 . . KASA ARCHITECTS ■ 1:1 _ Oil � t. 2S110DC00500 ' �. 2S110DC01300 Kin,<<itry„s .3` o _ 7111111--- .1111111:i iir „.„,,, 4 \� o sl \ .. ,L=L_„._.,„....\\ _,..............<",„ .•....,. ' . s\',,. ,, 45' ,, \ \•;\ o= 888 °O' Subject Site 40 , \,. N. EE =Tr= 41 =DURHAM RD Property owner information's valid \•f � for 3 months from the date panted on this map. `\ W MapPrinted t1-Aug-11 a Information on this Map is for general location 1/1 . r IIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIINIIIIIIIIIIPIIIOIP Y / only and should be venfied•With the Development Services Division. / DATR IS DERIVED FROM MUL PLE SOURCES TnE 5I'•Cc II;:A MAKES NOT WARRANT`REPRESENTATION CF C._AS A V CONTENT,ACCURACY TIMELINESS OR COMPLETENESS•OF AN'Cr-..E II DATAPROVIDED REREM i.:4E VOFTIGAROS A55 HE':� LIBABILRY FOR AH1'ERRORS OMISSIONS OR iM1A R LIES •..E INFORMATION PROVIOEO REGARDLESS CF nOh CAUSE It V �� �\ \��V\� - COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT 111111111111111111111 ,� E�w Cry'of Tigard .�� ',,, Ticili i_gyp( 13125 60 Mall Blvd .il rar•f�w1'! Tpard OR97223 �1'� 503 6 39-11 71 MI _ wwwbyard-orAOV /Veli' Aborhood /Voce AFFIDAVIT OF MAILING/POSTING NEIGHBORHOOD MEETING NOTICE IMPORTANT NOTICE: THE APPLICANT IS REQUIRED TO MAIL THE CITY OF TIGARD A COPY OF THE NEIGHBORHOOD MEETING NOTICE THAT PERTAINS TO THIS AFFIDAVIT AT THE SAME TIME PROPERTY OWNERS ARE MAILED NOTICE,TO THE ADDRESS BELOW: City of Tigard Planning Division 13125 SW Hall Boulevard Tigard,OR 97223-8189 IN ADDITION,THE APPLICANT SHALL SUBMIT THIS AFFIDAVIT&COPIES OF ALL NOTICES AT THE TIME OF APPLICATION. MAILING: I, KE 6.1 1 e 1 ,being duly sworn,depose and say that on the 141:6 day of At.k741 •T , 2011_,I caused to have mailed to each of the persons on the attached list,a notice of a meeting to discuss a proposed development at (or near) 114+b 51.E s a,,,t kie RR Ei..o Pg.. ,a copy of which notice so mailed is attached hereto and made a part of hereof. I further state that said notices were enclosed in envelopes plainly addressed to said persons and were deposited on the date indicated above in the United States Post Office located at IZZI0 5∎.1 r te. .a Sr.r `tj uc a ()Ace... A..1 , with postage prepaid thereon. / Iny' I. .Il 411%'•.I/ii Signature (In the ,resence of a Notary Public) POSTING: I, AtiNtt►.l rSAkro.I ,do affirm that I am(represent)the party initiating interest in a proposed land use application for C.26,14 lL-t i OF (N.trtL O,rF,cE affecting the land located at(state the approximate location(s)IF no address(s)and all tax lot(s)currently registered) 11145 91,-.1 Sams ZFigw DR— and did on the ILovb day of Aca4d rr ,20JL personally post notice indicating that the site may be proposed for a t-iT GiAeu,rmeaT P.eviei..i land use application,and the time, date and place of a neighborhood meeting to discuss the proposaL The sign was posted at TikE l,,ttto./.eL-c,..._k CC .11.t iE(.F1Et o R.. A„IV 1.1.40 AA rc01/40 (state location you posted notice on property) 4 i Si:nature (In the prese e of a Notary Public) (THIS SECTION FORA STATE OF OREGON,NOTARY PUBLIC TO COMPLETE/NOTARIZE) STATE OF ) County of In(1u1 ss. Subscribed and sworn/affirmed before me on the ?\ day of ,20`1` V ,, ?, OFFICIAL SEAL f{) : r� , CRYSTAL ANN HOLMES CivWvL { NOTARY PUBLIC—OREGON ) S '�-�` 1 �,„l COMMISSION N-60RE780 1 MY COMII.;SSION EXPIRES FEBRUARY 14,2015 i NOT 4.Y PUBLIC OF OREGON My CQmrnission Expires: Opvu & lag, 2 c\curpin\masters\neighborhood meetings\affidavit of mailing-posting neighborhood meeting.doc `-J Page 5 4S115BA00100 2S115 B 800 ALBERTSON'S INC EXECUTIVE PENSIO SN PR ERTIES PARTNERSHIP BY ALBERTSONS INC#565 1121 ALMON ST ATTN:TAX DEPT POR, LAN ,OR 97205 PO BOX 20 BOISE,ID 83726 2S115BA00102 2S110DC00300 ARCHLAND PROPERTY I LLC SSC PROPERTY HOLDINGS INC BY DOUBLE K VENTURES INC DEPT-PT-OR-08235 8255 SW HUNZIKER ST#101 PO BOX 25025 TIGARD,OR 97223 GLENDALE,CA 91201 2S110DC00600 2S110DC01000 CONGREGATE CARE ASSET V LP SUMMERFIELD ASSOCIATES,LLC BY THOMSON REUTERS INC BY HSC REAL ESTATE 2235 FARADAY AVE,STE 0 1500 SW FIRST AVE STE 1020 CARLSBAD,CA 92008 PORTLAND,OR 97201 2S110DCO2400 2S110DCO2500 DRT PROPERTIES LLC SUMMERFIELD CIVIC ASSOCIATION 9805 SW CHOCTAW ST 10650 SW SUMMERFIELD DR TUALATIN,OR 97062 TIGARD,OR 97223 2S110DCO2300 2S110DC00700 HIP WILLOWBROOK LLC TIGARD RETIREMENT RESIDENCE LLC BY HARSCH INVESTMENT CORP BY THOMSON REUTERS INC PO BOX 270$ 2235 FARADAY AVE,STE 0 PORTLAND,OR 97208 CARLSBAD,CA 92008 2S115AB01901 2S110CD07600 IBJ WHITEHALL BANK&TRUST CO TR TOBIAS INVESTMENT CO BY ALBERTSON'S INC 1900 SW RIVER DR#1101 ATTN:TAX DEPT PORTLAND,OR 97201 PO BOX 20 BOISE,ID 83726 2 110DC' 300 2S110CD00105 LU 'N 'OBERT C UNITED STATES NATIONAL BANK OF 0 %KV-NLAND,ERIC B BY US BANK PROPERTIES 114 S UMMERFIELD DR 2800 EAST LAKE ST TIGARD,OR t 7224 MINNEAPOLIS,MN 55406 2S110DC00500 LUTON,ROBERT C %KVERNLAND,ERIC B 11445 SW SUMMERFIELD DR TIGARD,OR 97224 2S115BA02500 SN PROPERTIES PARTNERSHIP 1121 SW SALMON ST PORTLAND,OR 97205 2S115AB 900 SN PRO TIES PARTNERSHIP 1121 S SA MON ST PORTLAND.OR 97205 . , Josh Thomas Susan Bcilkc 10395 SW Bonanza 11755 SW 1141h Place Tigard, OR 97224 Tigard, OR 97223 Gretchen Buehner David Walsh 13249 SW 136th Place 10236 SW Stuart Court Tigard, OR 97224 Tigard, OR 97223 Shannen Williams Rappold Marketing/Business Development Manager Patty Newth Perlo Construction 12180 SW Merestone Court 7190 SW Sandburg Street Tigard, OR 97223 Portland,,OR 97223 Tim Esau Heidi Brenneman PO Box 230695 11680 SW Tigard Drive Tigard, OR 97281 Tigard, OR 97223 CPO 4B 16200 SW Pacific Highway, Suite 11242 Tigard, OR 97224 Ross Sundberg 16382 SW 104th Avenue Tigard, OR 97224 Brian Wegener 9830 SW Kimberly Drive Tigard, OR 97224 Todd Harding and Blake Hering Jr. Norris Beggs & Simpson 121 SW Morrison, Suite 200 Portland, OR 97204 Rex Caffall 13205 SW Village Glenn Tigard, OR 97223 John Frewing 7110 SW Lola Lane Tigard, OR 97223 CITY OF TIGARD -SOUTH INTERESTED PARTIES (pg. I of I) (i:lcurpinlsetupllabels\CIT South.doc) UPDATED: 1-Jul-11 • KASA Architects.Inc August 16, 2011 RE: Medical/Dental Office Dear Interested Party: The purchaser of the property located at 11445 SW Summerfield Drive(tax lots 2S110DC00500 &01300) would like construct a 3,000 square feet medical/dental office building on the property. KASA architects, inc. is in the process of preparing a Site Development Review application for the building. Prior to applying to the City of Tigard for the necessary land use approvals, we would like to discuss the proposed building in more detail with the surrounding property owners and residents. You are invited to attend a meeting on: Tuesday, August 30, 2011 at 5:30pm Best Western 16105 S.W. Pacific Highway King City/Tigard, Or 97224 Please note that this will be an informational meeting on the preliminary plan for the building. The plan may be altered prior to the submittal of the application to the City. If you have any questions, please contact me at 503.284.6917. Sincerely, KASA Architects, Inc.6 Kevin Saxton Principal Neighborhood Meeting Notice Page 1 of 1 August 16,2011 4119 NE Cesar E.Chavez Blvd., Portland, Oregon 97211 p 503.284.6917 f 503.284.6917 www.kasapdx.com 15805 +? 15695 15700 15695 tr. 156 95 15695 QV 15695 .-F,NEII� 1153511535 _ 15695 -7-. .�,- 84' 11535 . 1153511535 11755 15805 , ' U 11545 11545 11545 °' 11545 11525 11205 4 42- 15900 -.. 11545 11525 11515 11545 11525 11515 `x+ 11275 I 11545 11525 11515 �� 11285 11515 cry 11285 1151511515 i 11515 tit 11295 159D5 11555 1126:, 1155511555 11555 11565 fJ 11290 / 11280 11270 11240 11565 1126011270 11240 11565 , 11250 11260 11250 SITE DURHAM RD 16200 11354 1601, 16200 Kt z t: ■• 16100 16098 r, 16180 Feet 6 250 16200 16200 16200 i I, ,, , 4119 NE 39th Avenue Portland,Oregon 97211 503.2E.1.6917 www.kcaopdx.com NEIGHBORHOOD MEETING MINUTES 01 Date of Meeting:August 31, 2011 Project: Schwindt Dental Office Proj. No.: 1105 11445 SW Summerfield Drive Prepared By: Kevin Saxton ksaxton @kasapdx.com Attendees: See Attached Attendance List Purpose: Discussion of the proposed building with the surrounding property owners and residents Discussion Items Note: Action items are listed in bold by responsibility. 01 Statement of Purpose 01.01 The attached Statement of Purpose was read to the attendees. 02 Description of Proposed Building 02.01 The attached Site Plan dated August 30, 2011 was handed out to the attendees. 02.02 The proposal includes a 3,000 square-foot medical-office building on a site that is currently occupied by a small office building and parking lot. The configuration of the building is currently being developed and the footprint maybe different than what is shown on the current Site Plan. 02.03 The parking lot will be expanded to accommodate 15 parking spaces. 12 to 15 parking spaces are required by the Development Code. 02.04 2 covered bicycle parking spaces will be provided as required. 02.05 There are two vision clearance triangles that need to be maintained on site. These are noted on the site plan. One is at the intersection of Durham Road and Summerfield Drive and is 35 feet deep on each side of the intersection (this was incorrectly stated as 30 feet during the meeting). The other is at the entrance off Summerfield Drive and is 30 feet deep from side of Summerfield to centerline of entrance. 02.06 The majority of the trees on site will be removed and mitigated since the trees are interior to the site where the new building and expanded parking lot will be located. Some of the tree mitigation will be accommodated on site by planting site trees and parking lot trees in addition to the required street trees. 03 Timeline 03.01 The Site Development Review application will be submitted around the middle of September. 03.02 The City will determine if the application is complete within 30 days of the submittal. Schwindt Dental Office, Neighborhood11445 SW Summerfield Drive Meeting Minutes 01 Page 1 of 2 AuguE 4119 NE Cesar E.Chavez Blvd., Portland, Oregon 97211 p 503.284.6917 f 503.284.6917 www.kasapdx.com • P_r':•,r .. 03.03 Once the application is deemed complete, an administrative decision will be issued within 45 to 60 days (this was incorrectly stated as 30 days during the meeting). Property owners within 500 feet of the site will be notified of the decision. 03.04 After the decision is issued, there will be a 10-day public appeal period. 04 Questions 04.01 When will construction begin? Construction will likely begin in January once all of the permit approvals have been acquired. 04.02 How many stories is the building? The building will be single-story. 04.03 Will the architectural style match the building next to it? No, the building will have a unique and more contemporary look. 04.04 How tall will the monument sign be? It is limited in height to 3 feet. 04.05 Are we aware that there is an agreement between the current owner and the Summerfield Civic Association for irrigation water to be supplied to the property across Summerfield Drive? The civic association is aware that this agreement will probably come to an end at the time this is done. We are aware of that and in fact the City is aware of the line and will require that to be corrected. Private water lines cannot be located under public streets. 04.06 Is the access driveway off Summerfield that is shown on the Site Plan existing? Yes it is and so is the entrance to the parking lot. The parking lot itself will be expanded to the south by about 25 feet and will be widened. 04.07 What will the landscaping be? Will it be something other than just bark dust? We are required to have 15% of the site landscaped. The proposed site plan is slightly over that. Parking lot screening is required and will likely consist of low shrubs. The plantings will be selected so that the landscaping looks appealing year round. 04.08 Is there a community input period after the city staff review or during it? After the city reviews the application, notification will go out to the property owners within 500 feet of the property. An appeal period will follow the final decision. 04.09 What type of construction will be building be and will it be a dental facility? The building will be wood-framed construction with a slab-on-grade foundation. And yes it will be a dental clinic. Attachments: Description Date Pages 1. Neighborhood Mtg Attendance List August 30, 2011 3 2. Statement of Purpose 1 3. Site Plan August 30, 2011 1 Schwindt Dental Office, Neighborhood 11445 SW Summerfield Drive Meeting Minutes 01 Page 2 of 2 Augu: 4119 NE Cesar E. Chavez Blvd., Portland, Oregon 97211 p 503.284.6917 f 503.284.6917 www.kasapdx.com a I ft S:•rh `17.1:25.1, NEIGHBORHOOD MEETING ATTENDANCE LIST Meeting Date: August 30, 2011 Location: Best Western 16105 S.W. Pacific Highway, King City/Tigard Project: Medical/Dental Office at 11445 SW Summerfield Dr. Proj. No.: 1105 Attendees: Name/Compan Addrr^esss 6 /.\ S Pi,., blr • , AMP -7/TQL"--)' 0-1 � C� - ___ s4) .Jd AtA4- 7741,4104 g7 .3 RA.NAft.,01\ 5LA(),)■114,6- S2j4 1 icbc .5wD.)Akeutil. 713. ,z-tit a, Neighborhood Meeting Attendance List Page 1 of 3 STATEMENT OF PURPOSE THE FOLLOWING NOTICE SHALL BE READ TO ATTENDEES AT THE BEGINNING OF A NEIGHBORHOOD MEETING. 4 Jtrwt vievicAL f G*.mik.OrfuE 11441 SumPlegFiEw Lit This meeting is regarding. (project name) ,located at (project location) . and is being held as required by the City of Tigard development review process. The purpose of this meeting is to inform neighbors of the project as currently planned. This meeting is not a decision forum and is not to approve or disapprove the project in whole or in part. It is to share information regarding the project and to solicit constructive input from neighbors and affected property owners. Application for the project being discussed here has not yet been submitted to the City. Therefore, the project will be at various stages of planning and some details may not be available at this time. Property owners of record within 500 feet should have received neighborhood meeting information and a list of frequently asked questions along with the notice of this meeting. This meeting is not attended by city staff in order to encourage dialogue between the developer and affected neighbors. Your comments and questions will be taken down and submitted with the application for consideration by the city planning staff. Property owners within 500 feet will be notified after a complete application is submitted. They will be provided an opportunity to comment. Any appeals are decided based on the provisions of applicable laws and the development code. For questions regarding the development review process, please contact the City of Tigard Planning Department. For project details,you will need to contact the developer. is\curpin\masters\neighborhood meetings\neighborhood meeting statement of purpose.doc Page 6 . , r, ________F________________________________1,—INN N , , —� . . y , , , / c c c c c c c �\ ' r C ,/ / COVERED BIKE / " I RACK FOR (2) /i SPACES l \ , r o zi o W � I f J /1) 1 i / VISION t w 1/ CLEARANCE i NEW BUILDING TRIANGLE / -3,000-SQ. FT. / 1 i i 3 -_ 4 v)/ , ' / u) • ° -- MONUMENT r--190- SIGN . I,a SW DURHAM RD GRADING SHOWN arch tects,inc. N FOR REFERENCE. Site Plan 1- = 20'-0" 4119 NE 39th Avenue Porlkmd,Oregon 97211 -- 503.284.6917 August 30,2011 www.kasapdx.com PRE - APPLICATION CONFERENCE NOTES CITY OF TIGARD PRE-APPLICATION CONFERENCE NOTES (Pre-Application Meeting Notes are Valid for Six (6)Months) TIGARD PRE-APP.MTG.DATE: STAFF AT PRE-APP.: NON-RESIDENTIAL APPLICANT: Kevin Saxton AGENT: Applicant Phone: (503) 284-6917 Phone: ( ) - PROPERTY LOCATION: ADDRESS/GENERAL LOCATION: 11445 SW Summerview Drive (1 TAX M AP(S)/LOT#(S): 2S110DC00500 &01300 NECESSARY APPLICATIONS: Site Development Review PROPOSAL DESCRIPTION: Demo 567 sf bank and construct 3,000 sf dental office with fifteen parking spaces. Some interior trees will be removed. COMPREHENSIVE PLAN MAP DESIGNATION: C-G - General Commercial District ZONING MAP DESIGNATION: C-G (PD) ZONING DISTRICT DIMENSIONAL REQUIREMENTS (Refer to Code Section 18.520.2 table) MINIMUM LOT SIZE: None sq. ft. Average Min.lot width:50 ft. Max.building height: 45 ft. Setbacks: Front: 0 ft. Side: 0/20 ft. Rear:0/20 ft. Corner:-ft. from street. MAXIMUM SITE COVERAGE:85%. Minimum landscaped or natural vegetation area: 15%. ® NEIGHBORHOOD MEETING (Refer to the Neighborhood Meeting Handout) THE APPLICANT SHALL NOTIFY ALL PROPERTY OWNERS WITHIN 500 FEET, INTERESTED PARTIES, AND THE CITY OF TIGARD PLANNING DIVISION of their proposal. A minimum of two (2) weeks between the mailing date and the meeting date is required. Please review the Land Use Notification handout concerning site posting and the meeting notice. Meeting is to be held prior to submitting your application or the application will not be accepted. * NOTE: In order to also preliminarily address building code standards, a meeting with a Plans Examiner is encouraged prior to submittal of a land use application. ® NARRATIVE (Refer to Code Chapter 18.390) The APPLICANT SHALL SUBMIT A NARRATIVE which provides findings based on the applicable approval standards. Failure to provide a narrative or adequately address criteria would be reason to consider an application incomplete and delay review of the proposal. The applicant should review the code for applicable criteria. CP1Y OF TIGARD Pre-Application Conference Notes Page 1 of 8 NON Residential application/Planning Division Section Z IMPACT STUDY (Refer to Code Sections 18.390.040 and 18.390.050) As a part of the APPLICATION SUBMITTAL REQUIREMENTS, applicants are required to INCLUDE IMPACT STUDY with their submittal package. The impact study shall quantify the effect of the development on • public facilities and services. The study shall address,at a minimum,the transportation system,including bikeways, ok!Itlij the drainage system,the parks system,the water system,the sewer system and the noise impacts of the development. For each public facility system and type of impact, the study shall propose improvements necessary to meet City standards, and to minimize the impact of the development on the public at large, public facilities systems, and �� affected private property users. In situations where the Community Development Code requires the dedication of real property interests, the applicant shall either specifically concur with the dedication requirement, or provide evidence which supports the conclusion that the real property dedication requirement is not roughly proportional to the projected impacts of the development. ® ACCESS (Refer to Chapters 18.705 and 18.765) Minimum number of accesses:One. Minimum access width:30ft. Minimum pavement width:24ft. All driveways and parking areas,except for some fleet storage parking areas,must be paved. Drive-in use queuing areas:nla. ® WALKWAY REQUIREMENTS (Refer to Code Section 18.705.030) WALKWAYS SHALL EXTEND FROM THE GROUND FLOOR ENTRANCES OR FROM THE GROUND FLOOR LANDING OF STAIRS,ramps, or elevators of all commercial, institutional, and industrial uses,to the streets which provide the required access and egress. Walkways shall provide convenient connections between buildings in multi-building commercial, institutional, and industrial complexes. Unless impractical, walkways should be constructed between a new development and neighboring developments. n SPECIAL SETBACKS (Refer to Code Chapter 18.730) ➢ STREETS: feet from the centerline of ➢ LOWER INTENSITY ZONES: feet,along the site's boundary. > FLAG LOT: 10-FOOT SIDE YARD SETBACK. ❑ SPECIAL BUILDING HEIGHT PROVISIONS (Refer to Code Section 18.730.010.B.) BUILDING HEIGHT EXCEPTIONS -Buildings located in a non-residential zone may be built to a height of 75 feet provided that ► A maximum building floor area to site area ratio(FAR) of 1.5 to 1 will exist; ■ All actual building setbacks will be at least half(1/2)of the building's height; and ► The structure will not abut a residential zoned district. ® BUFFERING AND SCREENING (Refer to Code Chapter 18.745) ' In order TO INCREASE PRIVACY AND TO EITHER REDUCE OR ELIMINATE ADVERSE NOISE OR A, VISUAL IMPACTS between adjacent developments, especially between different land uses, the City requires landscaped buffer areas along certain site perimeters. Required buffer areas are described by the Code in terms of width. Buffer areas must be occupied by a mixture of deciduous and evergreen trees and shrubs and must also achieve a balance between vertical and horizontal plantings. Site obscuring screens or fences may also be required; these are often advisable even if not required by the Code. The required buffer areas may only be occupied by vegetation, fences, utilities,and walkways. Additional information on required buffer area materials and sizes may be found in the Development Code. The ESTIMATED REQUIRED BUFFER WIDTHS applicable to your proposal area are: 0 feet along north boundary. 0 feet along east boundary. 0 feet along south boundary. 5 feet along west boundary. IN ADDITION, SIGHT OBSCURING SCREENING IS REQUIRED ALONG:east and southeast portions of the parking lot. CITY OF TIGARD Pre-Application Conference Notes Page 2 of 8 NON-Residential Application/Planning Division Section Z LANDSCAPING (Refer to Code Chapters 18.745,18.765 and 18.705) STREET TREES ARE REQUIRED FOR ALL DEVELOPMENTS FRONTING ON A PUBLIC OR PRIVATE STREET as well as driveways which are more than 100 feet in length. Street trees must be placed either � within the public right-of-way or on private property within six (6) feet of the right-of-way boundary. Street trees must have a minimum caliper of at least two (2) inches when measured four (4) feet above grade. Street trees it should be spaced 20 to 40 feet apart depending on the branching width of the proposed tree species at maturity. t . . Further information on regulations affecting street trees may be obtained from the Planning Division. eli, � A MINIMUM OF ONE (1) TREE FOR EVERY SEVEN (7) PARKING SPACES MUST BE PLANTED in and around all parking areas to order to provide a vegetative canopy effect. Landscaped parking areas shall include special design features which effectively screen the parking lot areas from view. These design features may include the use of landscaped berms,decorative walls,and raised planters. ® RECYCLING (Refer to Code Chapter 18.7551 Q�' �" �u Applicant should CONTACT FRANCHISE HAULER FOR REVIEW AND APPROVAL OF SITE •,, �� SERVICING COMPATIBILITY. Locating a trash/recycling endosure within a clear vision area such as at the ` V intersection of two (2) driveways within a parkin lot is prohibited. Much of Tigard is within Pride Disposal's A .r,,!"Service area. Pride Disposal can be reached at(503) 625-6177. PARKING (Refer to Code Section 18.765.040) REQUIRED parking for this type of use:12. Parking SHOWN on preliminary plan(s): SECONDARY USE REQUIRED parking. Parking SHOWN on preliminary plan(s): NO MORE THAN 50%OF REQUIRED SPACES MAY BE DESIGNATED AND/OR DIMENSIONED AS COMPACT SPACES. PARKING STALLS shall be dimensioned as follows: bb Standard parking space dimensions: 8 feet,6 inches x 18 feet,6 inches. • Compact parking space dimensions: 7 feet,6 inches x 16 feet,6 inches. Note: Parking space width includes the width of a stripe that separates the parking space from an adjoining space. Note: A maximum of three(3)feet of the vehicle overhang area in front of a wheel stop or curb can be included as part of required parking space depth. This area cannot be included as landscaping for meeting the minimum percentage requirements. HANDICAPPED PARKING: • All parking areas shall PROVIDE APPROPRIATELY LOCATED AND DIMENSIONED DISABLED PERSON PARKING spaces. The minimum number of disabled person parking spaces to be provided, as well as the parking stall dimensions,is mandated by the Americans with Disabilities Act (ADA). A handout is available upon request. A handicapped parking space symbol shall be painted on the parking space surface and an appropriate sign shall be posted. ✓ BICYCLE RACKS ARE REQUIRED FOR MULTI-FAMILY, COMMERCIAL AND INDUSTRIAL DEVELOPMENTS. Bicycle racks shall be located in areas protected from automobile traffic and in convenient locations. ❑ LOADING AREA REQUIREMENTS (Refer to Code Section 18.765.080) Every COMMERCIAL OR INDUSTRIAL BUILDING IN EXCESS OF 10,000 SQUARE FEET shall be provided with a loading space. The space size and location shall be as approved by the City Engineer. ® BICYCLE RACKS (Refer to Code Section 18.765) BICYCLE RACKS are required FOR MULTI-FAMILY, COMMERCIAL AND INDUSTRIAL DEVELOPMENTS. Bicyde racks shall be located in areas protected from automobile traffic and in convenient locations. CITY OF TIGARD Pre-Application Conference Notes Page 3 of 8 NON Residential Application/Planning llnision Section • n SENSITIVE LANDS (Refer to Code Chapter 18.775) The Code provides REGULATIONS FOR LANDS WHICH ARE POTENTIALLY UNSUITABLE FOR DEVELOPMENT DUE TO AREAS WITHIN THE 100-YEAR FLOODPLAIN, NATURAL DRAINAGEWAYS,WETLAND AREAS,ON SLOPES IN EXCESS OF 25 PERCENT,OR ON UNSTABLE GROUND. Staff will attempt to preliminary identify sensitive lands areas at the pre-application conference based on available information. HOWEVER, the responsibility to precisely identify sensitive land areas. and their boundaries. is the responsibility of the applicant. Areas meeting the definitions of sensitive lands must be clearly indicated on plans submitted with the development application. Chapter 18.775 also provides regulations for the use, protection, or modification of sensitive lands areas. RESIDENTIAL DEVELOPMENT IS PROHIBITED WITHIN FLOODPLAINS. ❑ STEEP SLOPES (Refer to Code Section 18.775.080.C) When STEEP SLOPES exist, prior to issuance of a final order, a geotechnical report must be submitted which addresses the approval standards of the Tigard Community Development Code Section 18.775.080.C. The report shall be based upon field exploration and investigation and shall include specific recommendations for achieving the requirements of Section 18.775.080.C. ® CLEAN WATER SERVICES (CWS) BUFFER STANDARDS (Refer to CWS R&O 07-20/USA Regulations-Chapter 3) LAND DEVELOPMENT ADJACENT TO SENSITIVE AREAS shall preserve and maintain or create a vegetated corridor for a buffer wide enough to protect the water quality functioning of the sensitive area. Design Criteria: The VEGETATED CORRIDOR WIDTH is dependent on the sensitive area. The following table identifies the required widths: TABLE 3.1 VEGETATED CORRIDOR WIDTHS SOURCE: CWS DESIGN AND CONSTRUCTION STANDARDS MANUAL/RESOLUTION&ORDER 07-20 SENSITIVE AREA DEFINITION SLOPE ADJACENT WIDTH OF VEGETATED TO SENSITIVE AREA4 CORRIDOR PER SIDES • Streams with intermittent flow draining: <25°/0 I 10 to <50 acres 15 feet I >50 to<100 acres 25 feet • Existing or created wetlands<0.5 acre 25 feet • Existing or created wetlands>0.5 acre <25% 50 feet • Rivers,streams,and springs with year-round flow • Streams with intermittent flow draining>100 acres • Natural lakes and ponds • Streams with intermittent flow draining: >25% I 10 to<50 acres 30 feet I >50 to<100 acres 50 feet • Existing or created wetlands >25% Variable from 50-200 feet. Measure in 25- • Rivers,streams,and springs with year-round flow foot increments from the starting point to • Streams with intermittent flow draining>100 acres the top of ravine(break in<25%slope), • Natural lakes and ponds add 35 feet past the top of ravine6 4Starting point for measurement=edge of the defined channel(bankful flow)for streams/rivers,delineated wetland boundary,delineated spring boundary,and/or average high water for lakes or ponds,whichever offers greatest resource protection. Intermittent springs,located a minimum of 15 feet within the river/stream or wetland vegetated corridor,shall not serve as a starting point for measurement. 'Vegetated corridor averaging or reduction is allowed only when the vegetated corridor is certified to be in a marginal or degraded condition. &The vegetated corridor extends 35 feet from the top of the ravine and sets the outer boundary of the vegetated corridor. The 35 feet may be reduced to 15 feet,if a stamped gcotechnical report confirms slope stability shall be maintained with the reduced setback from the top of ravine. CITY OF TIGARD Pre-Application Conference Notes Page 4 of 8 NON-Residential Application/Planning Division Section Restrictions in the Vegetate Corridor. NO structures, development, construction activities, gardens, lawns, application of chemicals, dumping of any materials of any kind, or other activities shall be permitted which otherwise detract from the water quality protection provided by the vegetated corridor,except as provided.*in the CWS Design and Construction Standards. Location of Vegetated Corridor. IN ANY RESIDENTIAL DEVELOPMENT WHICH CREATES MULTIPLE PARCELS or lots intended for separate ownership,such as a subdivision,the vegetated corridor shall be contained in a separate tract,and shall not be a part of any parcel to be used for the construction of a dwelling unit. 0;#., s‘1,t), .... CWS Service Provider Letter: PRIOR TO SUBMITTAL of any land use applications, the applicant must obtain a CWS Service Provider Letter ` which will outline the conditions necessary to comply with the CWS R&O 07-20 sensitive area requirements. If 1 a' there are no sensitive areas,CWS must still issue a letter stating a CWS Service Provider Letter is not required. ® SIGNS (Refer to Code Chapter 18.780) A •may?SIGN PERMITS MUST BE OBTAINED PRIOR TO INSTALLATION OF ANY SIGN in the City of 1 ard. " A "Guidelines for Sign Permits" handout is available upon request. Additional sign area or height beyond Code '' ,pit standards may be permitted if the sign proposal is reviewed as part of a development review application. Wr Alternatively,a Sign Code Exception application may be filed for Director's review. ® TREE REMOVAL PLAN REQUIREMENTS (Refer to Code Section 18.790.030.0 and the "Tree Plan Requirements Handout"included in your pre-application conference packet) A TREE PLAN FOR THE PLANTING,REMOVAL AND PROTECTION OF TREES prepared by a certified arborist shall be provided for any lot,parcel or combination of lots or parcels for which a development application 0001/2).' for a subdivision, partition, site development review, planned development, or conditional use is filed. PROTECTION IS PREFERRED OVER REMOVAL WHEREVER POSSIBLE (Address all items in the City's C Tree Plan Requirements Handout). THE TREE PLAN SHALL INCLUDE the following: • Identification of the location, size and species of all existing trees including trees designated as significant by the City; • Identification of a program to save existing trees or mitigate tree removal over 12 inches in caliper. 4,,,0 Mitigation must follow the replacement guidelines of Section 18.790.060.D according to the following standards and shall be exclusive of trees required by other development code provisions for landscaping, - ! streets and parking lots: t ' I Retainage of less than 25% of existing trees over 12 inches in caliper requires a mitigation program%Ito according to Section 18.150.070.D.of no net loss of trees; 1113412d I Retainage of from 25 to 50% of existing trees over 12 inches in caliper requires that two-thirds of the trees to be removed be mitigated according to Section 18.790.060.D.; kip Retainage of from 50 to 75%of existing trees over 12 inches in caliper requires that 50%of the trees to N be removed be mitigated according to Section 18.790.060.D.; I Retainage of 75%or greater of existing trees over 12 inches in caliper requires no mitigation; 0 ;.., t3v' , ► Identification of all trees which are proposed to be removed;and A protection program defining standards and methods that will be used by the applicant to protect trees during and after construction. TREES REMOVED WITHIN THE PERIOD OF ONE (1) YEAR PRIOR TO A DEVELOPMENT APPLICATION LISTED ABOVE will be inventoried as part of the tree plan above and will be replaced according to Section 18.790.060.D. CITY OF TIGARD Pre-Application Conference Notes Page 5 of 8 NON-Residential Application/Planning Dw non Section Z MITIGATION (Refer to Code Section 18.790.060.E.) REPLACEMENT OF A TREE shall take place according to the following guidelines: ▪ A replacement tree shall be a substantially similar species considering site characteristics. ► If a replacement tree of the species of the tree removed or damaged is not reasonably available, the Director may allow replacement with a different species of equivalent natural resource value. ► If a replacement tree of the size cut is not reasonably available on the local market or would not be viable, the Director shall require replacement with more than one tree in accordance with the following formula: I The number of replacement trees required shall be determined by dividing the estimated caliper size of the tree removed or damaged, by the caliper size of the largest reasonably available replacement trees. If this number of trees cannot be viably located on the subject property, the Director may require one (1) or more replacement trees to be planted on other property within the city,either public property or, with the consent of the owner,private property. ► The planting of a replacement tree shall take place in a manner reasonably calculated to allow growth to maturity. IN-LIEU OF TREE REPLACEMENT under Subsection D of this section, a party may,with the consent of the Director,elect to compensate the City for its costs in performing such tree replacement. ® CLEAR VISION AREA (Refer to Code Chapter 18.795) The City requires that CLEAR VISION AREAS BE MAINTAINED BET\VEEN THREE (3) AND EIGHT(8) FEET IN HEIGHT at road/driveway, road/railroad, and road/road intersections. The size of the required clear vision area depends upon the abutting street's functional classification and any existing obstructions within the clear vision area. ❑ ADDITIONAL LOT DIMENSIONAL REQUIREMENTS (Refer to Code Section 18.810.060) MINIMUM LOT FRONTAGE: 25 feet unless lot is created through the minor land partition process. Lots created as part of a partition must have a minimum of 15 feet of frontage or have a minimum 15-foot-wide access easement. The DEPTH OF AI.I.LOTS SHALL NOT EXCEED 21/2 TIMES THE AVERAGE WIDTH,unless the parcel is less than 11/2 times the minimum lot size of the applicable zoning district. CODE CHAPTERS ❑ 18.330(Conditional Use) ❑ 18.620(Tigard Triangle Design Standards) ❑ 18.760(Nonconforming Situations) ❑ 18.340(Director's Interpretation) ❑ 18.630(Washington Square Regional Center) ® 18.765(Off-Street Parking/Loading Requirement) ❑ 18.350(Planned Development) ❑ 18.640(Durham Quarry Design Standards) ❑ 18.775(Sensitive Lands Review) • 18.360(Site Development Review) ® 18.705(Access/Egress/circulation) ® 18.780(signs) ❑ 18.370(VarianceslAdjustments) ❑ 18.710(Accessory Residential Unit) ❑ 18.785(Temporary Use Permits) ❑ 18.380(Zoning Map/Text Amendments) ❑ 18.715(Density Computations) ® 18.790(Tree Removal) ❑ 18.385(Miscellaneous Permits) ❑ 18.720(Design Compatibility Standards) ® 18.795(Visual Clearance Areas) ® 18.390(Deasion Making Proceduresllmpact Study) ® 18.725(Environmental Performance Standards) ❑ 18.798(Wireless Communication Facilities) ❑ 18.410(Lot Line Adjustments) ❑ 18.730(Exceptions To Development Standards) ® 18.810(Street&Utility Improvement Standards) ❑ 18.420(Land Partitions) ❑ 18.740(Historic overlay) ❑ 18.430(Subdivisions) ❑ 18.742(Home Occupation Permits) ❑ 18.510(Residential Zoning Districts) 18.745(Landscaping&Screening Standards) ® 18.520(Commercial Zoning Districts) ❑ 18.750(Manufactured/Mobil Home Regulations) n 18.530(Industrial Zoning Districts) ® 18.755(Mixed Sold Waste/Recycling Storage) CITY OF TIGARD Pre-Application Conference Notes Page 6 of 8 NON Residential Application/Planning Division Section ADDITIONAL CONCERNS OR COMMENTS: Your questions: This will be a Site Development Review Type II, $4,687,ws,weeks, TDT$58,128, Parks $1,923.67. Your parking plan is ok for numbers. A common easement will be required for the shared access from Summerview Drive. A tree plan is required by a certified arborist. See TDC18.790.030, and 040. An additional parking lot tree is required at the southwest corner of the lot. — The monument sign can be 70 sq ft per face, wall signs can be 15% of the wall they are mounted on. Sign permits are not typically part of a SDR, they are permitted separately under specific sign applications. There is no recycle/refuse enclosure on the site plan. Provider approval required for roll-out& pick up. A re-addressing fee is required, $50.00 since the original building address will be retired. PROCEDURE Z. Administrative Staff Review. Public hearing before the Land Use Hearings Officer. Public hearing before the Planning Commission. Public hearing before the Planning Commission with the Commission making a recommendation on the proposal to the City Council. An additional public hearing shall be held by the City Council. APPLICATION SUBMITTAL PROCESS All APPLICATIONS MUST BE ACCEP TED BY A PLANNING DIVISION STAFF MEMBER of the Community Development Department at'Tigard City Hall offices. PLEASE NOTE: Applications submitted by mail or dropped off at the counter without Planning Division acceptance may be returned. The Planning counter closes at 5:00 PM. Maps submitted with an application shall be folded IN ADVANCE to 81/2" x 11". One,81/2" x 11" map of a proposed project shall be submitted for attachment to the staff report or administrative decision. Applications with unfolded maps shall not be accepted. The Planning Division and Engineering Department will perform a preliminary review of the application and will determine whether an application is complete within 30 days of the counter submittal. Staff will notify the applicant if additional information or additional copies of the submitted materials are required. The administrative decision or public hearing will typically occur approximately 45 to 60 days after an application is accepted as being complete by the Planning Division. Applications involving difficult or protracted issues or requiring review by other jurisdictions may take additional time to review. Written recommendations from the Planning staff are issued seven (7) days prior to the public hearing. A 10-day public appeal period follows all land use decisions. An appeal on this matter would be heard by the Tigard Hearings Officer. A basic flow chart which illustrates the review process is available from the Planning Division upon request. Land use applications requiring a public hearing must have notice posted on-site by the applicant no less than 10 days prior to the public hearing. This PRE-APPLICATION CONFERENCE AND THE NOTES OF THE CONFERENCE ARE INTENDED '10 INFORM the prospective applicant of the primary Community Development Code requirements applicable to the potential development of a particular site and to allow the City staff and prospective applicant to discuss the opportunities and constraints affecting development of the site. BUI DING PERMITS PLANS FOR BUILDING AND OTHER RELATED PERMITS WILL NOT BE ACCEPTED FOR REVIEW UNTIL A LAND USE APPROVAL HAS BEEN ISSUED. Final inspection approvals by the Building ZPP1/4. Division will not be granted until there is compliance with all conditions of development approval. These pre-application notes do not include comments from the Building Division. For proposed buildings or j ` modifications to existing buildings, it is recommended to contact a Building Division Plans Examiner to r-4 determine if there are building code issues that would prevent the structure from being constructed, as proposed. CITY OF TIGARD Pre-Application Conference Notes Page 7 of 8 NON Residential Application/Planning Division Section Additionally, with regard to Subdivisions and Minor Land Partitions where any structure to be demolished has system development charge (SDC) credits and the underlying parcel for that structure will be eliminated when the new plat is recorded, the City's policy is to apply those system development credits to the first building permit issued in the development (UNLESS OTHERWISE DIRECTED BY THE DEVELOPER AT THE TIME IN WHICH THE DEMOLITION PERMIT IS OBTAINED). PLEASE NOTE: The conference and notes cannot cover all Code requirements and aspects related to site planning that should apply to the development of your site plan. Failure of the staff to provide information required by the Code shall not constitute a waiver of the applicable standards or requirements. It is recommended that a prospective applicant either obtain and read the Community Development Code or ask any questions of City staff relative to Code requirements prior to submitting an application. AN ADDITIONAL PRE-APPLICATION FEE AND CONFERENCE WILL BE REQUIRED IF AN APPLICATION PERTAINING TO THIS PRE-APPLICATION CONFERENCE IS SUBMITTED AFTER A PERIOD OF MORE THAN SIX (6) MONTHS FOLLOWING THIS CONFERENCE (unless deemed as unnecessary by the Planning Division). PREPARED BY: Darrel"Hats"Watkins CITY OF TIGARD PLANNING DIVISION PHONE: 503-639-4171 FAX 503-624-3681 DIRECT: 503-718-2440 EMAIL: hap@tigard-or.gov tigard-or.gov TITLE 18(CITY OF 11GARD'S COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT CODE) INTERNET ADDRESS: www.tigard-or.gov H:\patty\masters\Pre-App Notes Comtnercial.doc Updated: 16-May-08 CITY OF TIGARD Pre-Application Conference Notes Page 8 of 8 NON-Residential Application/Planning Division Section wivr zcp City o f Tigard tAe�� A, vaia at° g s TDT—COUNTYWIDE TRANSPORTATION DEVELOPMENT TAX TIGARD Rate Calculation Worksheet APPLICANT )14 ■ X?O DATE q/,01, MAILING ADDRESS 4/11181E 61Az PREPARED BY //� trj CITY/ZIP/PHONI:/" 277 + 9�.2// S '3;28t/_/q j PLANS CHECK f 20)/_IPDOLC TAX MAP# 7 (� PRO ECT TITLE ,2511D�jGaoSoo 43/3v a 2 ACD0A✓i-D SITUS#ADDRESS //43/ 6il� 1Nf rAb /c/C�' � Ii , ,plai- FORMER USE(S) USE CODE UNITS X RATE AMOUNT 9,2_440--x 2 fi , 13 3 = 7//! 9 ✓i etb*/ L✓e- 520 7--yi I X X = X TOTAL TDT,FORMER USE(S) ,r/.// 1 PROPOSED USE(S) 147A( V////—/5,c1/2 USE CODE UNITS X RATE _ AMOUNT DESCRIPTION/NOTES ITE # TDT �2D 3.0 X 3,570 = ''7D, ,1 D 3,v0(21 De_kaixf et' X X = X = TOTAL TDT,PROPOSED USE(S) 170/ / /C) LESS TOTAL TDT,FORMER USE(S) — //) TDT INCREASE/(DECREASE) �� S/ / '8 (INCREASE=TDT DUE) PAYMENT METHOD 5 CASH/CHECK NC/1 e/Mi.4 Lac---00/".4(:=1'1- 35-0#/4 E- S-Co -'350 = f• G2 = 2E6-5 T/ CREDIT "7/ n ed --DGw L O- ct = f^lGtL k " BANCROFT AGREEMENT = �SD ,- 3 so * g e E s (PROMISSORY NOTE) d44-C-karoc4e-- DEFER TO OCCUPANCY ;, cry 72-5 r 7-- I/OFS/CD/FORMS/TDT Rate Calculation Worksheet'mid(Rev 4/22/09) PRE-APPLICATION CONFERENCE NOTES ➢ ENGINEERING SECTION Q TIGARD Cid Wilma Irmo Community rDeve(opment Snapi A<Better Community PUBLIC FACILITIES Tax Map[sl: 2S110DCIISII Dentist Office 2S1101C-11300 Tax LN[sl: 500 and 1300 Use Taw C-C The extent of necessary public improvements and dedications which shall be required of the applicant will be recommended by City staff and subject to approval by the appropriate authority. There will be no final recommendation to the decision making authority on behalf of the City staff until all concerned commenting agencies, City staff and the public have had an opportunity to review and comment on the application. The following comments are a projection of public improvement related requirements that may be required as a condition of development approval for your proposed project. Right-of-way dedication: The City of Tigard requires that land area be dedicated to the public: (1.) To increase abutting public rights-of-way to the ultimate functional street classification right-of-way width as specified by the Community Development Code; or (2.) For the creation of new streets. Approval of a development application for this site will require right-of-way dedication for: ® Provide 20-foot ROW radius for the return at SW Durham Road and Summerfield Drive. ® Provide sidewalk easement to cover portion of sidewalk on Summerfield Drive that appears to be outside the right of way. ® Take note that there is an access easement on the north side of the property. This easement appears to be the access into the complex from Summerfield Drive. ❑ SW to feet n SW to feet Street improvements: ❑ street improvements will be necessary along SW , to include: ❑ feet of pavement l concrete curb n storm sewers and other underground utilities -foot concrete sidewalk n street trees CITY OF T U D Pre-AspllcetIsn Contemn Notes Page 1 el Iewleemeol biloartu ❑ street signs, trafi intro' devices, streetlights and a tw .1 streetlight fee. ❑ Other: Agreement for Future Street Improvements: In some cases, where street improvements or other necessary public improvements are not currently practical, the improvements may be deferred. In such cases, a condition of development approval may be specified which requires the property owner(s)to provide a future improvement guarantee. The City Engineer will determine the form of this guarantee. The following street improvements may be eligible for such a future improvement guarantee: (1.) N/A (2.) Overhead Utility Lines: ❑ Section 18.810.120 of the Tigard Municipal Code (TMC) requires all overhead utility lines adjacent to a development to be placed underground or, if approved by the City Engineer, a fee in-lieu of undergrounding can be paid. This requirement is valid even if the utility lines are on the opposite side of the street from the site. If the fee in-lieu is approved, it is equal to $ 35.00 per lineal foot of street frontage that contains the overhead lines. Overhead utilities have already been undergrounded along SW Summerfield Drive. Service to the proposed building must be undergrounded. Sanitary Sewers: Connect to City sewer. Water Supply: 1. The Ci of Ti and is the water service rovider in this area. Coordinate with the Cit of Ti and tY 9 P Y 9 Water Division for water service details. There appears to be a large water meter serving the site. Determine if this meter supplies irrigation water to adjacent lots. Any irrigation line crossing public ROW needs to be rerouted. 2. Any irrigation system requires an approved backflow prevention device. ', 3. A reduced pressure principal backflow device is required on the property immediately after the meter. Note this requirement and accommodate it on the construction drawings. Fire Protection: Tualatin Valley Fire and Rescue District (South Division) [Contact: Drew DeBois, 503-649-8577] provides fire protection services within the City of Tigard. The District should be contacted for information regarding the adequacy of circulation systems, the need for fire hydrants, or other questions related to fire protection. Water service to meet fire protection requirements (especially if the building is to have sprinklers installed) must be coordinated with the City of Tigard. Storm Sewer Improvements: CITY OF TR011e Pre-Application Caalanaca Naas rags 2 of i ....i....M E..a..rr, All proposed developmer. `iin the City shall be designed such . storm water runoff is conveyed to an approved public drainage system. The applicant will be required to submit a proposed storm drainage plan for the site, and may be required to prepare a sub-basin drainage analysis to ensure that the proposed system will accommodate runoff from upstream properties when fully developed. The storm water runoff appears to drain to the ODOT drainage system on Highway 99W. Storm water detention is required. Provide storm water detention facility. Storm Water Quality: The City has agreed to enforce Surface Water Management (SWM) regulations established by Clean Water Services (CWS) Resolution and Order No. 07-20, which requires the construction of on-site water quality facilities. The facilities shall be designed to remove 65 percent of the phosphorus contained in 100 percent of the storm water runoff generated from impervious surfaces. The resolution contains a provision that would allow an applicant to pay a fee in-lieu of constructing an on-site facility provided specific criteria are met. The City will use discretion in determining whether or not the fee in- lieu will be offered. If the fee is allowed. it will be based upon the amount of impervious surfaces created; for every 2,640 square feet, or portion thereof. Please contact the Building Division for the current fee. Preliminary sizing calculations for any proposed water quality facility shall be submitted with the development application. It is anticipated that this project will require: ® Construction of an on-site water quality treatment facility is required. n Payment of the fee in-lieu. Other Comments: All proposed sanitary sewer and storm drainage systems shall be designed such that City maintenance vehicles will have unobstructed access to critical manholes in the systems. Maintenance access roadways may be required if existing or proposed facilities are not otherwise readily accessible. Other requirements are: 1. Submit water quality and detention calculations to the Development Engineer, City of Tigard, for review and approval. 2. After construction of the water quality treatment and storm water detention facilities, the developer p u or tp shall enter into an agreement with the City for future maintenance of these facilities. This agreement taArt will be recorded with Washington County and the facilities will be inspected periodically by the City °"AA for compliance with the terms of the .greement. TRANSPORTATION DEVELOPMENT TAX In 1990, Washington County adopted a county-wide Traffic Impact Fee (TIF) which was replaced in 2008 by a Transportation Development Tax (TDT) that became effective 7/1/09. The TDT program collects fees from new development based on the development's projected impact upon the City's transportation system. The applicant shall be required to pay a fee based upon the number of trips which are projected to result from the proposed development. The calculation of the TDT incorporates the proposed use of the land and the size of the project. The TDT is calculated, due, and payable at the time of building permit issuance. In limited circumstances payment of the TDT may be allowed to be deferred until the issuance of an occupancy permit. Deferral of payment until occupancy is permissible only when the TDT exceeds the TDT rate for a single- family home. ‘-6 4trte r 6,8at 3-41143 Pay the TD T. CITY OF TIGARO Pro-Applkstiss Conforms Notes Noe 3 N 6 Bawls Melt EJ INNrine PERMITS , "tt) Ai Public Facility Improvement (PFI) Permit: Any work within a public right-of-way in the City of Tigard requires a PFI permit from Development Engineering. A PFI permit application is available at the Planning/Engineering counter in City Hall. For more extensive work such as street widening improvements, main utility line extensions or subdivision infrastructure, plans prepared by a registered professional engineer must be submitted for review and approval. The fee structure for this permit is considered a cost recovery system. A deposit is collected with the application, and the City will track its costs throughout the life of the permit, and will either refund any remaining portion of the deposit, or invoice the Permittee in cases where City costs exceeds the deposit amount. NOTE: Engineering Staff time will also be tracked for any final design-related assistance provided to a Permittee or their engineer prior to submittal of a PFI permit application. This time will be considered part of the administration of the eventual PFI permit. The Permittee will also be required to post a performance bond, or other such suitable security. Where professional engineered plans are required, the Permittee must execute a Developer/Engineer Agreement, which will obligate the design engineer to perform the primary inspection of the public improvement construction work. The PFI permit fee structure is as follows: NOTE: If an PFI Permit is required,the applicant must obtain that permit prior to release of any permits from the Building Division. 1. Submit water quality and detention calculations to the Development Engineer. 2. Provide preliminary water quality and detention maintenance plan with the PFI permit submittal. 3. Enter into a water quality and detention facility maintenance agreement with the City on City forms after substantial completion of the project, but before final occupancy is issued. This agreement will be recorded and City will monitor the facilities in the future for compliance with the terms of the agreement. Building Division Permits: The following is a brief overview of the type of permits issued by the Building Division. For a more detailed explanation of these permits. please contact the Development Services Counter at 503-639-4171, ext. 304. - 0 ,4 Site Improvement Permit (SIT). This permit is generally issued for all new commercial, industrial and multi-family projects. This permit will also be required for land partitions where lot grading and private utility work is required. This permit covers all on-site preparation, grading and utility work. Home builders will also be required to obtain a SIT permit for grading work in cases where the lot they are working on has slopes in excess of 20% and foundation excavation material is not to be hauled from the site. Z-1) vrai Building Permit (BUP). This perms covers only the construction of the building and is issued after, or concurrently with, the SIT permit. U CITY OF TIGRD Pre-Aplicsf N conference Notes Pape 4 et 6 •.vN.1n.rt L,snano, Master Pei. '/1ST). This permit is issued for al. ogle and multi-family buildings. It covers all work necessary for building construction, incluuing sub-trades (excludes grading, etc.). This permit can not be issued in a subdivision until the public improvements are substantially complete and a mylar copy of the recorded plat has been returned by the applicant to the City. For a land partition, the applicant must obtain an Engineering Permit, if required, and return a mylar copy of the recorded plat to the City prior to issuance of this permit. Other Permits. There are other special permits, such as mechanical, electrical and plumbing that may also be required. Contact the Development Services Counter for more information. GRADING PLAN REQUIREMENTS FOR SUBDIVISIONS All subdivision projects shall require a proposed grading plan prepared by the design engineer. The engineer will also be required to indicate which lots have natural slopes between 10% and 20%, as well as lots that have natural slopes in excess of 20%. This information will be necessary in determining if special grading inspections will be required when the lots develop. The design engineer will also be required to shade all structural fill areas on the construction plans. In addition, each homebuilder will be required to submit a specific site and floor plan for each lot. The site plan shall include topographical contours and indicate the elevations of the corners of the lot. The builder shall also indicate the proposed elevations at the four corners of the building. PREPARED BY: C ct 7/4/1 / Deve aliment Engineer DATE Phone: (503)718-2470 Fax (503)718-2748 tempate t Revised March 4,2010 CITY OF TIGARD Pro-Aselicatien Ceberence Metes Page 5 el 6 I ntelseoeet HYIeseMee ADDITIONAL DOCUMENTS M Te Utiii , Clean Water Services File Number DEC 2011 C1eanWater Services ensitive Area Pre-Screening Site Assessment 2. Property Information (example 1S234AB01400) 3. Owner Information Tax lot ID(s): 2S110DCOO500 Name: Brandon Schwindt Company: CDBK Properties r.LL.. Address: 11565 SW Durham Road Site Address: 11445 SW Summerfield Drive City,State,Zip:Tigard OR 97219 City,State,Zip:Tigard, OR Phone/Fax: 503-332-8450 Nearest Cross Street: -Mail:ybrandon schwindt @yahoo.cam 4. Development Activity (check all that apply) 5. Applicant Information ij Addition to Single Family Residence(rooms,deck,garage) Name: Brandon Schwindt ❑ Lot Line Adjustment ❑ Minor Land Partition Company: CDBK Properties t.. Residential Condominium ❑ Commercial Condominium Address: 11565 SW Durham Road U1 Residential Subdivision i❑ Commercial Subdivision Tigard, OR 97219 i1 Single Lot Commercial I Multi Lot Commercial City,State, Zip: 9 Other Phone/Fax:203-332-8450 E-Mail: brandon_schwindt @yahoo.com 6. Will the project involve any off-site work? 0 Yes Zi No ❑ Unknown Location and description of off-site work 1 7. Additional comments or information that may be needed to understand your project Remove existing building and construct new 3000 SF dental office with associated parking This application does NOT replace Grading and Erosion Control Permits,Connection Permits,Building Permits,Site Development Permits,DEQ 1200-C Permit or other permits as issued by the Department of Environmental Quality,Department of State Lands andlor Department of the Army COE. All required permits and approvals must be obtained and completed under applicable local,state,and federal law. By signing this form,the Owner or Owner's authorized agent or representative,acknowledges and agrees that employees of Clean Water Services have authority to enter the project site at all reasonable times for the purpose of inspecting project site conditions and gathering information related to the projeetsite. I certify that I am familiar with the information contained in this document,and to the best of my knowledge and belief,this information is true,complete,and accurate, Print/Type Name ° ftz, 14 IAA,t- Print/Type Title '-P'fCS� L-L- - Signature D e /Z.- `Z-) r t r FOR bfSTRICTIUSE ONLY El Sensitive areas po ntially exist on site or within 200'of the site. THE APPLICANT MUST PERFORM A SITE ASSESSMENT PRIOR TO ISSUANCE OF A SERVICE PROVIDER LETTER. If Sensitive Areas exist on the site or within 200 feet on adjacent properties,a Natural Resources Assessment Report /may also be required. Ili Based on review of the submitted materials and best available Information Sensitive areas do not appear to exist on site or within 200'of the site.This Sensitive Area Pre-Screening Site Assessment does NOT eliminate the need to evaluate and protect water quality sensitive areas if they are subsequently discovered.This document will serve as your Service Provider letter as required by Resolution and Order 07-20, Section 3.02:1.All required permits and approvals must be obtained and completed under applicable local,State,and federal law. la Based on review of the submitted materials and best available information the above referenced project will not significantly impact the existing or potentially seensitve area(s)found near the site.This Sensitive Area Pre-Screening Site Assessment does NOT eliminate the need to evaluate and protect additional water quality sensitive areas if they are subsequently discovered.This document will serve as your Service Provider letter as required by Resolution and Order 07-20,Section 3.02.1:All required permits and approvals must be obtained and completed under applicable local,state and federal law. 0 This Service Provider Letter is not valid unless CWS approved site plan(s)are attached. iU The proposed activity does not meet the definition of development or the lot was platted after 919195 ORS 92.040(2). NO SITE ASSESSMENT OR SERVICE PRO l i■R LETTER IS REQUIRED. Reviewed by '° ` .79, / f - Date t 12- li t 2550 SW Hillsboro Highway • Hillsboro,Oregon 97123 • Phone:(503)681-5100 • Fax:(503)681-4439 • www.cleanwaterservices.org Harper KAS_03 4 HP '° Houf Peterson Righellis Inc. c4c r A;�U SCh P£ ARCFei t"P 7S�#&UR December 12, 2011 City of Tigard CD — Development Engineering 13125 SW Hall Boulevard Tigard, OR 97223 503-639-4171 Fax: 503-624-0752 http://www.tigard-or.gov Attn: Gus Ducnas RE: Sechwindt Dentist Office —Sight Distance Certification The access for this proposal is located 54 feet west of the site's east property line onto the private access, off of SW Summerfield Drive. The speed limit along the private drive is 10 M.P.H., based upon the posted speed limit requiring 50 feet of sight distance in both directions, in accord with Tigard Development Code Section 18.705.030.H.1. As required by Code Sections 18.705.030.H.1, sight distance from the access to the private drive was measured to be 110 feet to the east of the access in the other direction. The Code Section requires that measurements be based on an eye height of 3.5 feet and an object height of 4.25 feet above the road; and be assumed to be 10 feet from the near edge of pavement to the front of a stopped vehicle, (actual measurement is taken 15 feet from pavement edge). In conclusion, I hereby certify that the intersection sight distance at the proposed access for Sechwindt Dentist Office conforms to the requirements for sight distance as set forth in the Tigard Development Code. Kenneth M. Ackerman, P.E. 24 f I J et e LA-p, 12. 3►-2"1 i 205 SE Spokane Street • Suite 200 • Portland, OR 97202 • www.hhpr.com • 503.221.1131 ph • 503.221.1171 fax Albert Shields From: Albert Shields DI 2,01 / — 00003 Sent: Tuesday, January 22, 2013 12:04 PM To: 'Brandon Schwindt' Subject: RE: 11455 Summerfield Drive Traffic Development Tax Attachments: TDT estimate-03-26-2012.pdf Dr. Schwindt, I've attached a copy of the updated TDT estimate that I prepared 3/26/12 when your SDR was issued. It shows the calculation of a TDT for the proposed building as $89,157,just as your example does. The difference between your calculation and our estimate is in the amount of the credit for the previous use. The original TDT estimate from 7/18/11, which you attached to your note, showed a TDT of$11,982 for a "Bank, Drive- in, 567 sq ft.", ITE code 912. My 3/26/12 estimate corrected that entry to read $11,390 for a "567 sq ft Bank Office," ITE code 911, after I was advised that the previously existing bank facility was not a "drive-in" but, rather, a "walk-in." Applying the $11,390 figure as a credit against the $89,157 leaves a TDT increase of$77,767, the figure currently in our billing system. I don't know where the $11,174 figure you mentioned came from but it is not the credit figure on either of our estimates. I hope this answers your question. If not, please let me know. Albert Shields. rrillAlbert Shields City of Tigard N Permits/Projects Coordinator .. +t, , -- 4Dert;�tgard-or.ce. ;503) 718-2426 ;503)624-3681 :3.25 S';.haH B?•;d. ''gard, OR 97223 From: Brandon Schwindt [mailto:drbrandon.tigardOgmail.com] Sent: Monday, January 21, 2013 12:55 PM To: Albert Shields Subject: 11455 Summerfield Drive Traffic Development Tax Hi Mr Shields, I was hoping you could help me understand the TDT calculation. I've attached the form that was submitted during the pre development review for reference. My architect and my builder tell me that the total area of the outside of the building footprint is 3,815 square feet. So with the current TDT rate of$23,370 per 1,000 that makes $89,157. Adding the credit as listed in the attached form of$11,174 my arrhythmic comes to $77,175 total TDT. My city fee payment form list the currently due TDT amount as $77,767, a difference of$592. 1 • Albert Shields From: Brandon Schwindt <drbrandon.tigard @gmail.com> Sent: Monday. January 21, 2013 12:55 PM To: Albert Shields Subject: 11455 Summerfield Drive Traffic Development Tax Hi Mr Shields, I was hoping you could help me understand the TDT calculation. I've attached the form that was submitted during the pre development review for reference. My architect and my builder tell me that the total area of the outside of the building footprint is 3,815 square feet. So with the current T ate of$23,370 per 1,000 that makes$89,157. Adding the credit as listed in the attached form of$ , my arrhythmic comes to $77,175 total TDT. My city fee payment form list the currently due T T amount as$77,767, a difference of$592. Thank you for your assistance. Brandon Schwindt This message is intended only for the use of the individual or entity to whom it is addressed and may contain information that is privileged, confidential and exempt from disclosure under applicable law. If the reader of this message is not the intended recipient or the employee or agent responsible for delivering the message to the intended recipient, you are hereby notified that any dissemination, distribution or copying of this communication is strictly prohibited. If you have received this communication in error,please notify us immediately by telephone and destroy the original message. Thank you. www.drbrandon.com 503.620.2777 i City of Tigard TDT—COUNTYWIDE TRANSPORTATION DEVELOPMENT TAX ,.,G,,,LD Rate Calculation Worksheet APPLICANT /f kicS111 X7 p p DATE q/8 /J i MAILING ADDRESS 4/1/iE &Oft C'7JAvei 4vt. PREPARED BY CITY/ZIP/PHON ,T,7.2.// co3 21 /-(q/.," PLANS CHECKW20,/-00o/5- TAX MAP# 25nt' cDOSDO O/3ov PRO CTrITLE•OreAfAt7)014-befin-P9 1--,, SITUS#ADDRESS I/445"6ti44-Ap,Kf?tleLb)-e. o,&-riC L "", to, ,.IA- , FORMER USE(S) USE JTE # X RATE =I TDT DESCRIPTION/NOTES # CODE UNITS AMOUNT ' 2 I 1)2_141 x 2/, / 3 3 -II/// 4)5 wk` ��`'d''�S-`414/CZ 7 ii x = x = x = TOTAL TDT,FORMER USE(S) I/II g rZ- PROPOSED USE(S) FIjP o'h ". irr-19pl t/ 4 7 A( IA—6/39/,Z U#E CODE UNITS X RATE _ DU DESCRIPTION/NOTES I • 20 3•o x, 2 3,3*0 = ' 14/1O .3,oc,01zi De. 'i'c-2- x = x = x = y TOTAL TDT,PROPOSED USE(S) �'' o/.//0 LESS TOTAL TDT,FORMER USE(S)— "ii) / '.2--- TOT INCREASE/(DECREASE) ���// 8 (INCREASE=TDT DUE) PAYMENT METHOD r______ CASH/CHECK N Aat, «_.25,0*,t,Kg": 350�/��- CREDIT 5--e04.4-150 = /.4.z = 2 E�-5 % i 01)as4,0Q---0‘.4.Yeti G/rss_ r vJu.l? -46,4a SD f,rz, BANCROFT AGREEMENT gt'Od_ 3 50 >c 8:6"?. 9 E E 5 (PROMISSORY NOTE) yK d4C- a EP 3 DEFER TO OCCUPANCY A�71. 8/ r %,/! L/O, 923. Z t.OFS/CD,FORMSITIJI Note Ca'el:eton'NOrbneet nOct Mer:4221091 2 liAl City of Tigard Z-...-D L----5r.7/--0 : ■ • TDT-COUNTYWIDE TRANSPORTATION DEVELOPMENT TAX TiGARD Rate Calculation Worksheet APPLICANT 41/41°14- �/'.L�� DATE 3/2 &,/, Y� � A MAILING ADDRESS ,Cl ,, / C� �- Cis& L�1`t i/Q) /j'�v� PREPARE /74-89(5 CITY/ZIP/PHONE "e-poLi , 19/2 / 49 t PLANS CHECK .z 0,/ 4W3 TAX MAP# ,2. / I ,C O C_d Oceb >30D PROJECT TITLE _/ .7-21./A1/�i, % nom SITUS#ADDRESS ( 1 .4/"ISM c"�1(ui44414..e4Pd FORMER USE(S) USE CODE UNITS X RATE = OUNT DESCRIPTION/NOTES J 91/ ,(kl x Aq Dee = l/ 3 9'O: 66,7 w(( e 'r(ri` ex-- x, x = x = TOTAL TDT,FORMER USE(S) PROPOSED USE(S) F o/,,7j/ % /yir-APP</64 y7'1'AC Vi/i/-/£//Z USE CODE UNITS X RATE = AMODUNT DESCRIPTION/NOTES / Q3r�'1cx13 3, ' 70 _ 784q 1 � 76-re. ec- x �M riiii r x = x = TOTAL TDT,PROPOSED USE(S) 15� LESS TOTAL TDT,FORMER USE(S) - F//1 3 q62 TDT INCREASE/(DECREASE) *7'/ � (INCREASE=TDT DUE) PAYMENT METHOD ��jg-R--/ CASH/CHECK F-141a.Mt , 350 ��0f CREDIT 5-�4- =7350 - /, 6.8 EE--• BANCROFT AGREEMENT + 779 !)wee- ree WaAJ Gop POT (PROMISSORY NOTE) 3 S/5 4-Coc›U •= 3�e_e s DEFER TO OCCUPANCY a./aesvie_ 'cj(,6 (Y-6�3 k%,(2 714 -i I/OFS/CD/FORMS/TDT Rate Calculation Worksheet.indd(Rev.4/22/09) i'l/ .' ( V 1/ v` Harper HP Houf Peterson Righellis Inc. ENGINEERS • PLANNERS February 13, 2013 LANDSCAPE ARCHITECTS•$URVEYORS Hap Watkins City of Tigard 13125 SW Town Hall Blvd. RECEIVED Tigard,OR 97223 RE: Request for Minor Modification to SDR for Schwindt Dental Building FEB 13 2013 CITY OF TIGARD Hap, PLANNINGIENGINEERING Please accept the attached drawing, L1—Planting Plan, in place of the previously submitted planting plan for the purposes of tree mitigation at 11445 SW Summerfield Drive,Tigard,Oregon.While tree placement has changed,the original species and caliper sizes remain unchanged from our original submittal. It is our intent that the contractor meets the caliper sizes specified. It was clear to the construction and design teams that the placement of trees needed to change due larger than expected root ball sizes, conflicts with proposed lighting and storm-water facilities. Drawings T1 is unchanged and remains valid.The mitigation summary specifies that we will provide 41 caliper inches of on-site mitigation and 39 inches of offsite mitigation (payment of fees by owner). If you have any questions, please call me at 503-221-1131 Jeffery Creel, RLA Landscape Architect HARPER HOUF PETERSON RIGHELLIS INC. 205 SE Spokane Street • Suite 200 • Portland, OR 97202 • www.hhpr.com • 503.221.1131 ph • 503.221.1171 fax Hap Watkins From: Hap Watkins Sent: Wednesday, February 13, 2013 11:42 AM To: 'Kevin Saxton' Subject: RE: Schwindt Dentist Office;Tree Location Meeting I haven't checked your newest planting plan against the original SDR planting plan yet. However, if the caliper inches have not changed and you provide a narrative relating the reasons for the relocation, I will review the new plan and narrative as a revision to the SDR. It is important that the caliper inches are not reduced from the original plan. I was by the site last week and saw one or two trees that are multi-branched below 4 feet. If these are part of the planting plan, they must be measured at 4 feet above grade.They might not qualify.Just a note to check. I will be out of the office until the 25th of this month and can come by for inspection that afternoon or on the 26th. Can you flash me a copy of the narrative this afternoon so I can approve before taking vacation?Today is my last day for a while. From: Kevin Saxton [mailto:ksaxton @kasapdx.com] Sent: Wednesday, February 13, 2013 11:22 AM To: Hap Watkins Cc: 'Jeff Creel' Subject: FW: Schwindt Dentist Office; Tree Location Meeting Hi Hap, Attached is the revised landscape plan that I believe Jeff Creel talked to you about. The layout is the same as what Jeff recently showed you except that we have sifted two Black Tupelos in the NW corner of the parking lot to better match the NE corner of the parking lot. In order to achieve this, the two middle Black Tupelos on the NW corner need to be replanted so that one is centered like the NE and the fourth is planted in between the newly planted centered Black Tupelo and the existing one the west side of the NW corner. Please let me know if this minor shift is acceptable. Thank you! Attachment: L1-PLANTING PLAN.pdf Sincerely, Kevin Saxton LEED®AP KASA architects,Inc. 4119 NE Cesar E Chavez Blvd. Portland,Oregon 97211 503.284.6917 1 PLANT SCHEDULE R E TREES 2 L20 L2.0 E p FEB132013 V 7 Nvsso sytvatica - Black Tupelo A$ A "/ ; n o 4"CAL B&B, WELL BRANCHED, LIMBED TO 6' 7 'LANVNINGO NGGNE RI L I NG $ f I , 7ATL 11ED13GREEN c,>ti- Y 4 RObinia pseudoocacia 'Frisia' - Frisio Honeylocust 2�1� 4'TALL HEDGE SCREEN Al 2"CAL B&B, WELL BRANCHED, LIMBED TO 6' r V 4101Allabk 1 Catalpa speciosa - Northern Catalpa �r!0� �r Pa �,- Tr.___-� A?^. n��4"CAL B&B WELL BRANCHED, LIMBED TO 6' -- , , • k:' i' �'ID �� �� v _ ���'.,�`..'� CLEAR VISION ■ `O ple lOa�'A• „,�/� PLANTINGS- f O G -_-_ ......,..,:„ J'TALL MAX. el b. 6 Styrax oponicus 'Snowcone' Japanese Snowbell �g 9$f14 '1y� �;{O !�7 ���3” CAL B BWL BRANCEDLIMBED ,t `.�:•.;.;.;,5�' 0a/D �J a' Tau ��.•• •. �' HEDGE SCREEN 5' �•• - 907.OPACITY 110.111 I I�y. ,�AI. a �4'��� 1 Trachycorpus Fortunei Chinese Windmill Palm 4' IALL HEDGE SCREEN Ilan �47 4 V;1�� �i 8'BTH B&B. WELL BRANCHED. LIMBED TO 6' !;'M" 90%OPACITY Imo! f..I 7 a . /j r f / tr.IN COVERED BIKE In / • witii SHRUBS RACK FOR (2) ��34�/ , 41I fit'�14�1 ft- "�S SPACES !`%r� i T o _1 yf luaw 1 Choisyr, ternota 'Sundance'- SundonS Orange Blossom .19 hg=,'1v f j 7 ���4, QI_v{9TV ° 5 GAL CON FULL PLANTS, SPACING AS SHOWN �• �,�, a 5' TALL x 5' WIDE (PRUNNED) - EVERGREEN f� I•�p'•;i p'.•••.. i1a 48 Abelio x grandiflora Gloss Abelia �;4•∎••• • .•a •i O ••I•"wi Et e 2 GAL CONL, FULL PLANTS, SPACING AeS SHOWN gal � I ��G••"••O'•4' TALL x 4' W1Df (PRUNNED) - EVERGREEN -��!�'pp!� �Rn�rf swi O 2G8 AL semyervrens 'Aureovonegata'- Variegated Boxwood (D Ila ° I ' ' ' ° I . , � ••-', / ` Q 5 GAL CON 7, FULL PLANTS, SPACING AS SHOWN 1 911 1`;��. '' 3' TALL x 4' WIDE (PRUNNED) - DECIDUOUS A �� d 'New! • I 127 Pennisetum 'Princess Caroline' �in /.iI 3 \ W 1 GAL CONL, FULL PLANTS, SPACING AS SHOWN , 1 —' !171 n y .aal_'' 30" TALL x 30" WIDE - DECIDUOUS ` 16Ry ' O 12 Ilex globro 'Compacts' Compact Inkberry ` ''!Iag, ` r 3 GALICONT FULL PLANTS, SPACING AS SHOWN ` BUFFER - 10'MIN. 1.wul � C \ , 4' TALL x 4' WIDE - EVERGREEN 1"��a w 15 Hibiscus swim's 'Anton Two'-Lilkim Rose of Sharon �'� 1 . C O 5 GAL I4' TALL FULL PLANTS,IDE -DECIDUOUS AS SHOWN OI ''0124 d G 4' TALL x 3' WIDE -DECIDUOUS -- ; \ C 73 Trochelospermum osiaticum - Asian Star Jasmine ® 2 GALCONL, FULL PLANTS, SPACING AS SHOWN J1- I •a 18" TALL x 3' WIDE - EVERGREEN :O �. �,' r^ �1 /...4-p:.,� V J O 59 Hemerocollis Joon Senior White Evergreen Doylilly �• ®, OQ ..* 4 2 GALCONT., FULL PLANTS, SPACING AS SHOWN •_?,:.� '1 �D,,G��'�� 2' TALL x 2' WIDE - EVERGREEN e� MC Poo V i� 1' d 1G2 AL robust°P'Green Screen' Green Screen Bamboo �i���pi al QQ,p,+ 'ql��tl.,� O 2 GAL CONL, FULL LANTS, SPACING AS SHOWN 1�O /�0'1�'Q'�;���►1�{'��e� KASA 10' TALL x 5' WIDE - EVERGREEN er.T OI� 1�— �" Q trr .�• cr,.... CLEAR VISION PLANTINGS- .. .I „ - /Q eo gip,44,,,, , �r-`i r O��i�'� .y 3"TALL MAX. SHRUBS architects, inc. 10 fAcorus colamus 'Varieaatus' - Striped Sweet faQ .ei OI`` 1 I�(i i�(i` Qi)(i){i)�"(ifi 1 1) 1 1 Nei 1 1 Ifi�;�i 1 1 1 1 S 1 IA 1�1��14�` (�; 36" O.C. 0.11i.:cikb'.... , __ �.�.�..+� .x:9'01. i l l AR. ► 3' TALL x 3' WIDE - EVERGREEN �� •iQ F d • ' '� • ' • � ,119 NE Cesar re Chavez Ave. airs t 92400.11 4��1•111r�t���� ' , I 1�1"P 9NEd. E. 97411 GROUNDCOVER Dj r/ 1 •�'�I'�'• SW03.28a.d917 ►�Mk_ ''1 111!111101111101‘1491111441 1111�61110 110..4 .���� kawPdx.com a 7_- a a A / MONUMENT Schwindt• 357 IRubus pentalobus - Creeping Bramble SIGN Medical/Dental \\ 4"PO 24 O.C. 9 `1�1 —ww- [` 01fICe 4 I j` TREE LeASED TO 6' ----- -- 110 Pennisetum alopecuroides 'little bunny'- Dwarf Fountain Gross 1 11445 SW Summerfield _ 1 GAL I CONT., FULL PLANTS, 18" D.C. SW DURHAM RD Drive Tigard.Oregon KASA Proj# 1105 152 lmperato cidindrica 'Red Baron'- Blood Gross 1 GAL CONT., FULL PLANTS, 12" O.C. Harper zd% SDR Feb 12 2013 .7.4,40 796 IFCarex divulso - Berkeley Sedae < l Houf Peterson ,7D �� 112" 0.C. , Righellis Inc. 'JE! P CRfErELL O OREGON PLANTING PLAN E N G I,+I E R S•PLANNER 5 • 06!73/11 IANDSCAPI ARCHITEC75•SURVEYORS Al 205 SE Spokane SDSS, Suite 200. Paaod,OR 97202 '+PC Ai' phone:503.221.1131 www.hhpr.eom fax:503.221.1171 coovreht KASA kchaecet,Inc 2012 City of Tigard Z.-Di Ls i-t, ) IN _ ■ TDT-COUNTYWIDE TRANSPORTATION DEVELOPMENT TAX TiGARD Rate Calculation Worksheet APPLICANT t d/4- %', QjL - DATE 3/2 ly , Z MAILING ADDRESS ,G) / / el //���g s� l�1`,,vQ� ,la PREPARE 74�(5 CITY/ZIP/PHONE ��( -4,4 �J &? G, ,r 2-t f PLANS CHECK D// .._61:405 TAX MAP# 5 I i7TC__00S0I)41300 PROJECT TITLE SITUS#ADDRESS 1 ` .c/<IC '6hi C.5u` f46 FORMER USE(S) USE CODE UNITS X RATE = TDT DESCRIPTION/NOTES / 91/ ,v(4,1 x _1O, oee = ll 3 TO: 66,7 f l w( �, cre_ x = x = x = TOTAL TDT,FORMER USE(S) PROPOSED USE(S) FY O/b / % f fl79—App c/ 4YW A( ViA—/3 0/Z USE CODE UNITS X RATE _ � ,I DESCRIPTION/NOTES / ,o3r1'lcx123, '370 = 78q 1 x 73 14 r-llf iii f x = x - TOTAL TDT,PROPOSED USE(S) /t567/ / LESS TOTAL TDT,FORMER USE(S) - #/// 3 q 0 TDT INCREASE/(DECREASE) / W.0. (INCREASE=TDT DUE) ---- 1i PAYMENT METHOD �-j4-/� ■ � CASH/CHECK F.-t£ U 3 S D7f/g f `-�l7 ti�¢ti kt CREDIT 5e-4- 35�0_Q= /• ( S EE BANCROFT AGREEMENT ✓�/tO (1-}e�' ff�' ' f ax,o�/i�J 4c,,0 j£c (PROMISSORY NOTE) 315 s-<aa0 •= 3�e_e, y(/ DEFER TO OCCUPANCY alaP - /,l7 �-6�3 >�.-2 7W, zsI I/OFS/CD/FORMS/TDT Rate Calculation Worksheet.indd(Rev.4/22/09) — / Z ?r`p r // c '' GFN RA_ NvOTES , - WO S ALL C NFOR WT IH THE CITY OF TIGARD STANDARDS, THE INTERNATIONAL BUILDING CODE t (I8C), AND THE UNIFORM PLUMBING CODE(UPC), '-' - THE LOCATION AND DESCRIPTIONS OF EXISTING UTILITIES SHOWN ARE COMPILED FROM AVAILABLE -"-- - , RECORDS AND/OR FIELD SURVEYS. THE CITY OR UTILITY COMPANIES DO NOT GUARANTEE TH£ • ACCURACY NOR TFIE COMPLETENESS OF SUCH RECORDS. EXISTING TOPOGRAPHIC INFORMATION Co - / SHOWN IS BASED ON SURVEY PERFORMED BY REPPETO&ASSOCIATES, INC. LAND SURVEYORS,CP• V - / GATED 8-TO-IT. • / '' • BOUNDARY AND BASIS OF BEARINGS ARE PER PARTITION PLAT 1998-128. WASHINGTON - - - _ - _ - _ - - _ - _ ,l COUNTY PLAT RECORDS. 0 5 10 20 ELEVATIONS BASED ON WASHINGTON COUNTY BENCH MARK NO. 561. THE BENCHMARK FOR THIS / ..—� PROJECT IS A 1-1/2"BRASS DISK IN CONCRETE SIDEWALK AT THE NE CORNER OF YB) 7$) co a. @ CP S • SCALE: I"- TO' HIGHWAY 99W(PACIFIC HIGHWAY)AND DURHAM ROAD, ELEVATION =190.990. NGVD 29 4'. 7 DATUM. F17S7t �37,*� °► IC / , ■ _ - CONTRACTOR SHALL NOTIFY EACH IUNDERGROUNDfUTILITY AT LEAST 48 BUSINESSSDAYTHOURS PIT`-.... RS�, eR SG _ PRIOR TO EXCAVATING, BORING OR POTHOLING. ALL UTILITY CROSSINGS SHALL BE POTHOLED AS --BLS - 66 0p -,,, ` NECESSARY PRIOR TO EXCAVATING OR BORING TO ALLOW THE CONTRACTOR TO PREVENT GRADE 167.20 8 B,r . ` _ -• .. .-' , �6�6 - OF ALIGNMENT CONFLICTS.• .... IAr��� �`O o 0 0 , PROVISIONS SHALL BE MADE BY THE CONTRACTOR TO KEEP ALL EXISTING UTILITIES IN SERVICE ' I, AND PROTECT THEM DURING CONSTRUCTION. COORDINATE MTH ENGINEER/ARCHITECT. �c \t ,` (�� �� ,6 EROSION AND SEDIMENT CONTROL NOTES: CTG C C C - - - r Q2 THE CONTRACTOR SHALL BE RESPONSIBLE FOR PROPER INSTALLATION AND MAINTENANCE OF ALL 18.89x6 90 '-'11114�-r�+1O 0, C C C x,, EROSION AND SEDIMENT CONTROL MEASURES,IN ACCORDANCE WITH LOC CHAPTER 52, STATE, AND FEDERAL REGULATIONS. ALL EROSION AND SEDIMENT CONTROL MEASURES SHALL BE J --- INSTALLED, INSPECTED, AND MAINTAINED PER THE EROSION PREVENTION AND SEDIMENT CONTROL T' 1 /1J I' PLANNING AND DESIGN MANUAL, DECEMBER 2000. •' .\# ` T�� TG / r THE IMPLEMENTATION OF THESE ESC PLANS AND CONSTRUCTION,MAINTENANCE, REPLACEMENT, 00 1 161.4.1P.+ ® 18T?D 80'1 / AND UPGRADING OF THESE ESC FACILITIES IS THE RESPONSIBILITY OF THE CONTRACTOR UNTIL ALL A655° CONSTRUCTION IS COMPLETED AND APPROVED BY THE LOCAL JURISDICTION, AND �i0 l 785 % I •- VEGETATION/LANDSCAPING IS ESTABLISHED, THE OWNER SHALL BE RESPONSIBLE FOR + ® MAINTENANCE AFTER THE PROJECT IS APPROVED UNTIL VEGETATION/LANDSCAPING IS ESTABLISHED. THE ESC FACILITIES SHOWN ON THIS PLAN MUST BE CONSTRUCTED IN CONJUNCTION WITH ALL TAI �I / CLEARING AND GRADING ACTIVITIES,AND IN SUCH A MANNER AS TO INSURE THAT SEDIMENT AND 'i� SEDIMENT LADEN WATER DOES NOT ENTER THE DRAINAGE SYSTEM, ROADWAYS, OR VIOLATE a ,�`9> 1, Cee 1:" APPLICABLE WATER STANDARDS. ® RB fi�G CSj 89 1� 1 �cb��c f �� - THE ESC FACILITIES SHOWN ON THIS PLAN ARE MINIMUM REQUIREMENTS FOR ANTICIPATED SITE•1�•0 an $ 1`O% 7s 1� 6 CONDITIONS. DURING CONSTRUCTION PERIOD, THESE ESC FACILITIES SHALL BE UPGRADED AS NV' - NEEDED FOR UNEXPECTED STORM EVENTS AND TO ENSURE THAT SEDIMENT AND SEDIMENT-LADEN 87 787.52 TC �•- /1.. ...T: ;,, 0 WATER DOES NOT LEAVE THE SITE. \ } 187,02 BC % : �, rf. Oro DURING ACTIVE CONSTRUCTION, ESC MEASURES SHALL BE INSPECTED AND MAINTAINED DAILY BY . • * AN EROSION CONTROL PLAN MANAGER(SPECIFICALLY DESIGNATED BY THE CONTRACTOR)AND ll '(•s / MAINTAINED AS NECESSARY TO ENSURE THEIR CONTINUED EFFECTIVENESS. ESC MEASURES WILL 7 -.. 0 10� •1 1 lil BE INSPECTED EVERY 2 WEEKS OR 24 HOURS FOLLOWING A RAIN EVENT OF 0.5 INCHES OR r in ® .J1 '•I 0; GREATER, DURING INACTIVE PERIODS THE EPCM SHALL INSPECT ALL EROSION AND SEDIMENT CP t ^' ! 1,F CONTROLS AND COMPLETE AN INSPECTION LOG AND MONITORING FORM AFTER EACH INSPECTION. 0 o =fail = -- to = v I 1.9?.65 1872 4I. )�� I ..�J AT NO TIME SHALL SEDIMENT BE ALLOWED TO ACCUMULATE MORE THAN 1/3 THE BARRIER HEIGHT. ' --- ------ EC 1871 787.3 // / y TB) I�Dx t' • ' m, STABILIZED GRAVEL ENTRANCES SHALL BE INSTALLED AT THE BEGINNING OF CONSTRUCTION AND •7 �, 1.OX .1•`� 1.5x 'o� reke 15e1-- MAINTAINED FOR THE DURATION OF THE PROJECT ADDITIONAL MEASURES MAY BE REQUIRED TO :� - r.�- �- INSURE THAT ALL PAVED AREAS ARE KEPT CLEAN FOR THE DURATION OF THE PROJECT.Mll II _ • , '�a 781 788 �■ �j� Q RECEIVED SURACESAARE NCOMPLETED AND/OR AVEGETATION ISHREI-ESTABLISHED.D INLET LPROTECTION I 4C, ! W MEASURES SHALL BE IN PLACE DURING SAW CUTTING ACTIVITIES. 2�— J •r i APR 17 2012 ALL CATCH BASINS AND CONVEYANCE LINES SHALL BE CLEANED PRIOR TO PAVING. THE• CLEANING OPERATIONS SHALL NOT FLUSH SEDIMENT-LADEN WATER INTO THE STORM WATER 7g 187 8G9 8,N ' 0 I 11 W MANAGEMENT SYSTEM. 18780 'e9 •9 -L'8• / 78s PROPOSED •� li CITY OF TIGARD PAVEMENT SURFACES AND VEGETATION ARE TO BE PLACED AS RAPIDLY AS POSSIBLE. DENTAL OFFICE 7e, .00* 69` i, v) PLANNING/ENGINEERING SEEDING SHALL BE PERFORMED NO LATER THAN SEPTEMBER 1ST FOR EACH PHASE OF CONSTRUCTION. F.FE. = 188.00 !8 4 .- •• ti � - / 1i PUBLIC STREETS WILL BE SWEPT DAILY. IF NECESSARY, TO ALLEVIATE SEDIMENT DISCHARGE TO • - / J 6,7,9, 11 �•'' N, THE STORM WATER MANAGEMENT SYSTEM. UNRLTERED WASH WATER CANNOT BE DISCHARGED TO \II • li STORM DRAINS. Ii 189 ., 41 TEMPORARY GRASS COVER MEASURES MUST BE FULLY ESTABLISHED BY OCTOBER 1ST FROM i" / it I OCTOBER 1ST THROUGH APRIL 30TH, THE WET WEATHER EROSION PREVENTION MEASURES WAL BE �9/ - +� I i I IN EFFECT FOR ANY EXPOSED SOIL OR SOILS NOT FULLY ESTABLISHED. SEE THE EROSION • • • PREVENTION AND SEDIMENT CONTROL PLANNING AND DESIGN MANUAL(CHAPTER 4)FOR / �' I 1 REQUIREMENTS. ALL STOCKPILED SEDIMENT WILL BE COVERED WITH PLASTIC SHEETING AND 7� lei_ `�,, 40.66 - ISOLATED WITH SILT FENCING OR CHECK DAM AT THE TOE OF SLOPE WHEN NOT IN USE. ALL (b NEWLY EXPOSED SOILS WILL BE PROTECTED WITH AN ADEQUATE GROUND COVER AT THE END OF•T. T. T •'� �� CONSTRUCTION EACH DAY (STRAW, MULCH. COMPOST, WOOD CHIPS, PLASTIC SHEETING,ETC. _ ` . 7Bjg� a T- 1� � ,; A I CONSULT THE DETAIL SHEET IN THE PERMIT OR THE MANUAL FOR SPECIFICATIONS). CITY OF TIGARD THE CONTRACTOR SHALL NOT REMOVE ESC MEASURES UNTIL VEGETATION IS FULLY ESTABLISHED 1 .it Approved............. AND INSPECTOR HAS APPROVED VEGETATION GROWTH. 191 0000• /1 ^__ FN AREAS SUBJECT TO SURFACE AND AIR MOVEMENT OF DUST, WHERE ON-SITE OR OFF-SITE V{NIdItIO►1a��y Approved----.................. DAMAG4 LIKELY TO OCCUR, ONE OR MORE OF THE FOLLOWNG PREVENTATIVE MEASURES SHALL KA S A i II �gO For only the work [B N FOR DUST CONTROL: architects, Inc. -- - PERMIT NO. G 2 A. MINIMIZE THE PERIOD OF SOIL EXPOSURE THROUGH r 90 See Letter to: Follow 7 THE USE OF TEMPORARY GROUND COVER AND OTHER allow TEMPORARY STABILIZATION PRACTICES. 4119 NE Cesar E.Chavez Ave. PO.IOr d,Oregon 97211 I" THE 511E IS SPRINKLED WITH WATER UNTIL SURFACE 503.284.6917 S.W. DURHAM RD. Job Addr . W /._ I,, WT£pF MUD REPEAT SNED DRTOEPREVENT STAB ZED RY k°S°t2�'°°m By: Date: CONSTRUCTION ENTRANCE DETAILS. Schwindt /1'�' Medical/Dental GRADING & EROSION CONTROL CONSTRUCTION NOTES PAVING SPRAY EXPOSED SOILS W11H A DUST PALLIAflVE. NOTE USED OIL IS PROHIBITED AS A PALLIATIVE. CD INSTALL CONSTRUCTION TEMPORARY ENTRANCE PER DETAIL, SHEET CI.1. PRE-PAVING AS-BUILTS SHALL BE SUBMITTED TO THE CITY OF VANCOUVER WET WEATHER EROSION CONTROL Office CONSTRUCTION OFFICE AND CITY INSPECTOR FOR STORM SEWER PRIOR TO PAVING. STOCKPILES THAT WILL BE EXPOSED FOR MORE THAN 14 DAYS SHALL BE PROTECTED 141TH 11445 SW Summerfield CD INSTALL SEDIMENT CONTROL FENCE PER DETAIL, SHEET al. ON OCTOBER 1ST OF EACH YEAR, IF THERE ARE EXPOSED SOILS, DISTURBED AREAS, OR GROUND PLASTIC SHEETING OR WITH A TEMPORARY GROUND COVER USED IN CONJUNCTION WITH Drive PAVING WILL NOT BE ALLOWED DURING WET OR COLD WEATHER, PER W.S.D.O.T. COVER VEGETATION NOT FULLY ESTABLISHED SUFFICIENT TO PREVENT EROSION, A SPECIFIC TEMPORARY/PERMANENT SEEDING. STOCKPILES THAT CONTAIN ONLY STRIPPINGS SHALL BE 72 INSTALL TREE PROTECTION FENCE PER DETAIL, SHEET C1.1. SPECIFICATIONS. EROSION CONTROL PLAN SHALL BE PREPARED BASED ON THE EXISTING AND EXPECTED SITE IMMEDIATELY COVERED WITH PLASTIC SHEETING. SEDIMENT FENCES SHALL BE PLACED AT THE TOE Tigard,Oregon GRADE.13 SA NCUT EXIST. ALL PAVEMENT SHALL BE STRAIGHT CUT PRIOR TO PAVING. EXISTING PAVEMENT AND 3EDIMENTI CONTROL PLANNING EAND RDESIGN MANUAL CHAPTER 4EF EREQUIREMENTS).�FOR OF SLOPE OF ALL STOCKPILES. KASA Proj# 1EXIST. PAVEMENT AND MATCH EXIST. SHALL BE REMOVED AS NECESSARY TO PROVIDE A SMOOTH TRANSITION FOR BOTH SURFACE WATER FACILITIES, FIBER MATTING SHALL BE INSTALLED IN ALL AREAS EXPOSED TO t" (Ti') CONSTRUCT WALL ALONG EDGE OF SWALE. RIDE AND DRAINAGE. WATER INUNDA TION. FIBER MATTING SHALL EITHER BE SEEDED(PER THE DESIGN)OR PLACED Harper ,`�,FS PROfe S�P.�it Mard,5.2012 PRIOR TO PLANTING OF PLUGS, CUTTINGS, REEDS,RUSHES, OR SHRUBS. ALL MEASURES AND e , as 1 N`F ,� ti ALL RIMS. COVERS AND FRAMES SHALL BE ADJUSTED TO FINISH GRADE UNLESS SPECIFICATIONS FOR MATERIALS USED SHALL BE PER PLAN OR AS SPECIFICALLY APPROVED BY 15 CONSTRUCT CURB PER DETAIL, SHEET C1.1. OTHERWISE NOTED. THE ENGINEER AND CITY INSPECTOR. IF ANY ADDITIONAL AREAS BECOME EXPOSED. DISTURBED, I P �� Houf Peterson -�,/ 'z '� _. 16 CONSTRUCT SIDEWALK PER DETAIL. SHEET C1.1. OR STRIPPED OF VEGETATION BETWEEN OCTOBER 1ST AND APRIL 30TH, THE PLAN SHALL BE �K�' I. REVISED OR OTHERWISE EXPANDED PER THE STANDARDS AND AS DIRECTED BY THE ENGINEER AND Righellis Inc. oR6coN 1 • 0 - 17 CONSTRUCT PERVIOUS CONCRETE PAYERS PER DETAIL, SHEET C1.1. THE CITY INSPECTOR. PRIOR TO NOVEMBER 1ST OF EACH YEAR, WET WEATHER MEASURES SHALL �`"4i_C°T.16.�"9P GRADING& BE INSTALLED AND FULLY FUNKTIONAL. zj HMICNxfI�G EROSION CONTROL 18 CONSTRUCT BOULDER RETAINING WALL. BOULDERS SHALL NOT BE PLACE WHERE 205 SE Spokane Street Sono 200. Penland,OR 97202 PLAN HEIGHT IS MORE THAN 3 FEET ABOVE GUTTER ON DURHAM ROAD phone:503.221.1131 www.hhpr coin Ta, 101 221 1171 i taMxs9 12-91-13 copyright NASA FV WnectS.Inc.2011 --1, • s HINGED DEFLECTOR TO 8"MINIMUM GROWING MEDIUM FACILITATE CLEAN-OUT RIM - MIN. DIST. FROAf WEE EQUAL TO 1'FOR EACH r CAL DBH, FILTER FABRIC MATERIAL A 56'WOE ROLLS OR AS SHOMN ON PLANS 45'B£ND I l _- I „[y. 2' OKA t —GRATE ELEV. o USE STITCHED LOOPS OVER W T vMgX 3µ1V `,� PLAN) GRADIMG • 2"x 2"POSTS TO BE ORANGE POLY FABRIC MESH _ r - 1 _ f r to sa.,7zz,,,/;/, �G27S' INSTALLED ON UPHILL SIDE FENCING ON STEEL POSTS _ - ._ TO FORM CONTINUOUS iA/�yi SIPHON '4. FILTER OF THE SLOPE PROTECTIVE BARRIER "=�." -a �'� v fi'MAXIMUM SPACING FABRIC AROUND TREES) - -- I Y �'_7 MATERIAL � a -. =its #4, �JT MAX. 6^ l FRONT NEW m _ ? !'�� � �MM —14"X 14 X 41" N.T.S. FILTER FABRIC 2C "LYNCH"CATCH NM BASIN, p. "—I L'- -I APPRO�D EQUAL \ \'' 12"DRAIN ROC / t 1 ANGLE BOTH ENDS OF FILTER I � f PRECAST CONCRETE HEIGHT OR \FABRIC FENCE'TO ASSURE SOIL STEEL BRACKET ANCHORING IS TRAPPED SYSTEM AS REQUIRED TO NOTES: SIDE VIEW UNDISTURBED MAINTAIN FENCE FIRMLY ERECT VARIES A>� N.T.S. EXISTING GRADE FOR DURATION OF PROJECT 1. SWALE TO HAVE ESTABLISHED VEGETATION PRIOR TO PAVING. TEE,WYf.OR<S'BEND 1. PLANT SWALE AND POND PER LANDSCAPE PLANS. INTERLOCKED T VIEW USE PIPE MANUFACTURES ADAPTER CONNECTOR OR N. .5. TEE OR WYE 2"x 2"POSTS "FfRNCO"FLEXIBLE COUPLING WITH STAINLESS AND ATTACH STEEL CLAMPS OR APPROVED EQUAL. SEDIMENT CONTROL FENCE TREE PROTECTION FENCING DETAIL INFILTRATION SWALE — TYPICAL CROSS SECTION LE (SEE PLAN) CATCH BASIN N.T.S. N.TS • • T T pN �IS'GCSS SO MIN,. • • Op 3 1/8'x8"XB"PERVIOUS CONCRETE PAVER 3/4" R f 6��EDGE CURB JOINT S'MIN. SEE NOTES ROW ///////%%WS 25'MIN. _ 3 4'i 4"CHOKER AGGREGATE z s.� TT 22 CLEAN PT RUN OR 3^- 6"CLEAN ROCK ► n diEE'`�' 8 J/2"DRAIN ROCK(30-402 VOID SPACE) 'y��� '��:oz g^ =.:.'-_ DRAINAGE BLOCKOUT ; . �-1�.--� _r r 3' I.D. SCHEDULE 40 ROAD __I___ SUBGRADE REINFORCEMENT + GEOTEXTILE FABRIC NON-WOVEN DWV- PIPE(ABS /COUPLING PVC) ' - Tom- =TEXTILE,AS REQUIRED 1.0)' (MIRAFI 180N OR EQUAL) 7 8"MIN. \\\ 16' ------ / 2'OF 3/4'-0'BASEROCK DEPTH 12"FULLY COMPACTED SUBGRADE •COMPACTED SUBGRADE J •20'MIN.FCR SINGLE FAMILY AND DUPLEX RESIDENTIAL NOTE: (95%CQIIPACIION-MAX DRY DENSITY CHOICER AGGREGATE SHOULD BE A 3/8-INCH A5TMD 1557) GRAVEL CONSTRUCTION TO 3/4-INCH UNIFORMLY GRADED CRUSHED ENTRANCE CURB RAMP ROCK OR CRUSHED GRAVEL 1MTH AT LEAST • . il ID: SIDEWALK ADJACENT TO CURB iMD MECHANICALLY FRACTURED FACES. • 121 r-PAYMENT f 9 L �,�/,��/�/�/////// /g/,/ 1Y�� PERVIOUS CONCRETE PAVERS SECTION 5 MIN. ROW Ra•i� ra ROAD /. _ t t. . • -\/\/\/\/\//\G\//�//�//�j.N ---.!. .. 474 1 1111 11#.11- 1 /�, COMPACTED SUBGRADE J • NOTES: 2" OF 3/4"-0 BASEROCK 1. THE ENTRANCE SHALL BE MAINTAINED IN A CONDITION THAT WILL PREVENT TRACKING OR FLOWING OF NOTES: SEDIMEM ONTO PUBUC RIGHT-OF-WAYS.THIS MAY REQUIRE TOP DRESSING, REPAR AND/OR CLEAN • OUT OF ANY MEASURES USED TO TRAP SECINENT. 1. TRAVERSE EXPANSION JOINTS TO BE PROVIDED AT EACH POINT OF TANGENCY 2. WHEN NECESSARY.WHEELS SHALL BE CLEANED PRIOR TO ENTRANCE ONTO PUBLIC RIGHT-OF-WAY --SIDEWALK AWAY FROM CURB S. THEN WASHING INTO IS AN AP EO, E SHALL BE DONE ON SEDIMENT AREA STABILIZED w17H CRUSHED STONE KASA OF THE CURB EXPANSION AT OTHER LOCATIONS AS REQUIRED TO LIMIT THE SPACING THAT DRAINS INTO PN APPROVED SEDIMENT TRAP OR SEDIMENT BASIN. TO A MAXIMUM OF 20 FT. NOTES: 4. WHERE RUNOFF CONTAINING SEDIMENT LADEN WATER IS LEAVING THE SITE VIA THE CONSTRUCTION ENTRANCE.OTHER MEASURES SHALL BE IMPLEMENTED TO DIVERT RUNOFF THROUGH AN APPROVED 2. TRAVERSE EXPANSION MATERIAL TO BE PRE-MOLDED NON-EXTRUDED MATERIAL FILTERING MANSIONS LTERING SYSTEM. 1. CONCRETE SHALL BE 3000 P.5.1. AFTER 26 DAYS, 6 SACK MIX, SLUMP RANGE 5MANSIONS architects, Inc. WITH A MINUMUM THICKNESS OF 1/2'. OF I-1/2 TO 3". SINGI F FAMLY . 20'LONG BY 20' WIDE 8'DEEP OF V"MINUS CLEAN ROCK. 3. TRAVERSE CONTRACTION JOINTS TO BE SPACED NOT MORE THAN 10 FEET APART COMMERCIA WITH A DEPTH OF AT LEAST ONE FOURTH OF THE CROSS SECTIONAL AREA. 2. PANELS TO BE 5 FEET LONG. sa'LONG BY 20'WIDE 3-6"CLEAN ROCK, FOR FURRIER INFORMATION 4119 NECesOTE.CIKrve2 M GOVERNING AUTHORITY MAY REQUIRE GEOTEXTILE FABRIC TO ON DESIGN CRITERIA SEE PaNOn3 Oregon 97211 4. CONCRETE BREAKING STRENGTH TO BE 3000 PSI AFTER 28 DAYS. 3. EXPANSION JOINTS TO BE PLACED AT SIDES OF DRIVEWAY APPROACHES, PREVENT SUB-SOIL PUMPING. CHAPTER 4 OF CLEAN WATER 503.284.6917 UTILITY VAULTS, WHEELCHAIR RAMPS, & AT SPACING NOT TO EXCEED 45 FEET. SERVICES EROSION PREVENTION V'W^"I• OPT. AND SEDIMENT CONTROL 5. DRAINAGE ACCESS THROUGH NEW CURBS SHALL BE PLACED A MIN. OF 2 FEET PLANNING AND DESIGN MANUAL 4. FOR SIDEWALK ADJACENT TO THE CURB AND POURED AT THE SAME TIME AS THE AND MAX. OF 3 FEET FROM PROPERTY LINES. - -- Schwindt CURB, THE JOINT BETWEEN THEM SHALL BE A TROWELED JOINT WITH A MIN. 1/2" RADIUS. CONSTRUCTION ENTRANCE Medical/Dental 5. CURB IS SIDEWALK USED OR IF SIDEWALK MINIMUM IS INTENDED A PORTION INCHES OFI DRIVEWAY.BLE • Clean•�aier c i_-- Office OTHERWISE SIDEWALK SHALL HAVE A MINIMUM THICKNESS OF 4 INCHES. Detail Drawing 855 REVISED 12-06 Ow.el.NMetU.I. . 11445 SW Summerfield 6. DRAIN BLOCKOUTS IN CURBS SHALL BE EXTENDED TO BACK OF SIDEWALK WITH 3 DIAMETER Drive SCHEDULE 40 DWV(ABS OR PVC)PIPE AT 2%SLOPE. CONTRACTION JOINT TO BE PLACED OVER PIPE. _ Tigard,Oregon KASA Proj# 1105 BY• NC/SCALE APPROVED BY NO SCALE / AGUSTIN P.aDUENAS / \, AGUSTIN P.DUENAS Harper , �PAOF Sin Permit Henri 5.2012 iiiiii EKN]A4III11W pEAAInYR1T DWG NO ER4IWO,n tIEPMTNLNT Houf Peterson _ m D�.a a ..0 CONCRETE SOS NO g 1 N '� 1TS0le AI.IW. STANDARD CURB I.,v...NA 6w 1 a v �Q e•,I. leMe.�� �1sM. A.MD,MGM fen. 1W Iµ6. �Ifl,00,m�M- Y p W-fit ' ALI ?•�,1/IZ4• t+�fL, Jut,'2001 25 E t - JULY 2001 SIDEWALK � 20 e' A(i//"�/// - CITY OF ROARO CITY OF MARO I mem O.. A•.+wK OAR Righellis Inc. ORE •'OT 16,,0^\r HIHCNaO.0' DETAILS • • 205 SE Spokane Saver. Suite 200. Portland,OR 97202 phone:503.221.1131 wuv.hhpr.com fax:503.221.1171 EXPIR5 I2-31-te I oomph:KASA Architects.Inc.201 GENERAL NOTES - - _ 1 / WORK SHALL WITH If ALL CONFORM THE CITY OF TIGARD STANDARDS, THE `---- _ - INTERNATIONAL BUILDING CODE(IBC), AND THE UNIFORM PLUMBING - II / CODE(UPC). --'-- FIRE HYD THE LOCATION AND DESCRIPTIONS OF EXISTING UTILITIES SHOWN ARE 78 PSI / COMPILED FROM AVAILABLE RECORDS AND/OR FIELD SURVEYS. THE CITY OR UTILITY COMPANIES DO NOT GUARANTEE THE ACCURACY NOR - / THE COMPLETENESS OF SUCH RECORDS. EXISTING TOPOGRAPHIC / INFORMATION SHOWN IS BASED OJ SURVEY PERFORMED BY FIHPR 7T 0 5 10 20 ELEVATIONS BASED OJ CITY OF WASHINGTON COUNTY BENCH MARK NO. -�w�� 486. THE BENCHMARK FOR THIS PROJECT IS BRASS DISC. LOCATED IN ` z, �iS / SCALE 1"= 10' THE NORTHWEST CORNER OF HWY. 99 BRIDGE OVER R X R TRACKS / AND COMMERCIAL ST. NORTHWEST CORNER OF SAID BRIDGE 2 FEET V NORTHWEST OF A BRASS DISC MARKED '11CAR0 1946'.ELEVATION = 1 193.968' `------ -- - THE CONTRACTOR SHALL COMPLY N11N ALL REQUIREMENTS OF ORS• ' 757.541 TO 757.571. THE CONTRACTOR SHALL NOTIFY EACH -- UNDERGROUND UTILITY AT LEAST 48 BUSINESS-DAY HOURS PRIOR TO --_• EXCAVATING, BORING, OR POTHOLING. ALL UTILITY CROSSINGS SHALL .I `' BE POTHOLED AS NECESSARY PRIOR TO EXCAVATING OR BORING TO • J '\ ALLOW THE CONTRACTOR TO PREVENT GRADE OF ALIGNMENT 8 • CONFLICTS. 6 • tQ h / PR '\, ONSIONS SHALL BE MADE BY THE CONTRACTOR TO KEEP ALL / EXISTING UTILITIES IN SERVICE AND PROTECT THEM DURING \__ 'j •. CONSTRUCTION. COORDINATE WITH ENGINEER/ARCHITECT. • U -er, / L 1' STORM DRAINAGE i� / ;� STORM DRAIN PIPE, BENDS, AND FITTINGS SHALL BE PVC(ASTM 3034, _ I�J�� % /I /�/ SOR 35 OR C-900)OR SMOOTH INTERIOR HIGH DENSITY POLYETHYLENE ! / l /, CORRUGATED PIPE AS PRODUCED AND SPECIFIED BY ADS PRODUCT .I -��� , /.' i� NAME LANl2(TM), OR EQUIVALENT. UNLESS 01HERVASE SPECIFIED ON I it ,/I PRIOR TO TESTING AND INSPECTION OF THE STORM SYSTEM,ALL PARTS 3 1 �/ OF THE SYSTEM SHALL BE CLEANED OF ALL DEBRIS. . 1 !I I T , / :'i TESTING OF STORM PIPELINE SHALL BE IN ACCORDANCE WITH CITY OF �� 1�1 r i ,4 TIGARO REQUIREMENTS 187 QJ9 LF �J C:1 WATER NOTES s=2.ox ALL PIPE SHALL HAVE 36"MINIMUM COVER MEASURED FROM FINISH Q GRADE. . I 86.71.E ' J 6"PVC PIPE •• I_LJ ALL WATER LINE WORK IN PUBLIC RIGHT-OF-WAY,INCLUDING METER • S 1 .• BUT EXCLUDING WORK ON THE BACKSIDE OF THE DOMESITC METER, I.E. IN= 186.87 .� CO SHALL BE CONSTRUCTED BY THE CITY OF PORTLAND AND COORDINATED I.E. OUT= 186.00 0:1 BY THE CONTRACTOR. UPON COMPLETION OF THE INSTALLATION OF /1 LOEI6I1.0%TO POOH Operas rOl tupa npy �I� + THE WATER SYSTEM ALL LINES SHALL BE FLUSHED AND DISINFECTED IN /I 1/ / i REQUIREMENTS NTHEHCCON ACTOR SHALL TEST ALL LINES PER THE /// PROVIDE CLEAN OUTS PER PLUMPING CODE I l • %. ,- �, I I,J1 11 CITY REQUIREMENTS. 1� U �• ∎ -- - !' �I PRIVATE DOMESTIC AND FIRE SERVICE LINES 3 I/2"OR SMALLER SHALL I 188 I (- •L I +i� BE TYPE K COPPER OR SCHEDULE 40 PVC,LINES 4"OR LARGER TO BE ,I iI CLASS 52 D.I.PIPE OR PVC PRESSURE PIPE(C-900 CLASS 150) lI I ALL WATER PIPE SHALL COMPLY WITH CITY OF TIGARD, AWWA, AND UL i- I _ J �I 1, STANDARDS. • 187 �� I SANITARY SEWER ^8 I _, r SANITARY SEWER PIPE SHALL BE PVC 3034 SORJS, CONCRETE AS7M CU, • __(-1_ I OR APPROVED EQUAL. ALL SANITARY SEWER CONSTRUCTION SHALL BE IN / 1 �` / PROPOSED � � I i 42 LF ACCORDANCE WITH CITY OF TIGARD STANDARD SPECIFICATIONS ADJUST B8 < J �i © 6"PVC PIPE MANHOLE AND CLEANOUT RIMS TO FINISH GRADE. DENTAL OFFICE I RIM= 186.87 MISC. UTILITIES 1 LE. IN= 786.27 r`y� 0 , I.F. OUT= 186.00 ELECTRICAL, TELEPHONE, CAS, AND TV SERVICE SHALL BE COORDINATED / S= 0.005 BY THE CONTRACTOR WITH THE APPROPRIATE UTILITY COMPANY, / 189- �'' I ..1 .� I COORDINATE LOCATION WITH OWNER • '0/ \11111 \1111111111111k UI 11 . ► , _4,s „, FIRE HYD 90 PSI II 191 (`— t — - - — 0. KASA 19 architects, Inc. 4119 NE Cesar E. 2 Ave Portland,Oregon on 97 97211 503.284.6917 •S.W. DURHAM RD. "°"".�'�d`.`°m Schwindt Medical/Dental .t Office 11445 SW Summerfleld Drive f. CONSTRUCTION NOTES -. KASA Prot#Oregon KASA Proj# 1105 O CONSTRUCT INFILTRATION SCALE SEE DETAIL ON SHEET Cl.? # Harper ���pRoN Sire Permit W.015.2012 O INSTALL 4"SANITARY SEWER LATERAL \g G t NB OCONNECT SANITARY SEWER LATERAL TO EXISTING 1>fPE W17H CLEAN �7 HP `� Houf Peterson j'/`'r��Ja�* 0 OUT, IE= 179.7+/-. /'/�/ Righe11is Inc. ` �" ,oaacaN� : • O INSTALL AREA DRAIN. SEE DETAIL ON SHEET C1.1 'D!te.5 STORM DRAINAGE• O INSTALL STORM SEN£R PIPE. • �WrCHAElt•C &UTILITIES 205 SE Spokane Street, Suite 200, Portland,OR 97202 PLAN plane.503.221.1131 www.hhpr.con, fax,503.221.1171 'Elin0Pres 12-al-ta 1 eepynpht KAMANO1it ,Inc,2011 T . - -- _ 1 „,.. .„, — --- - / 4”WHITE STRIPE 7I (iYP,) '� // 24"O.C. / SCALE: 1"= 10' ' , 4" WHITE E STRIPE(TYP.) 0 0 0 jo: ___=_........,..........., 0 0 0 s / 4 0 icin . C C C 45- r 1 1 6.0� / �I PER PLAN(5'MIN)- _ 3.00'R /� j 'I I 1 2.60'R / 7� J !, b o I ACCESSIBLE STALL STRIPING co)I. n N- O // N.LS. (V N c d/ , / ,/, _ If 2° 10.5° 6.73 0 ©• a". 2.00'R T,P. • /f /i STRIPING NOTES: R • yTT r 48.00' 9.00'-+8.79 ( All PARKING LOT STRIPING SHALL BE PAINT. -...- 9,00' +J / TRAFFlC.MARKfNG PAINT SHALL BE INDUSTRY STANDARD: ASSHTO M-248, TYPE 3F J 24 144 1. O 0 f I ACCEPTABLE TRAFFIC PAINTS: O FULLER O'BRIEN: TRAFFIC LINE PAINT, 382-12 I WHITE TRAFFIC Cr;_ GENERAL: 1RU-TEST SUPREME ZONE MARKING PAINT, 1010 WHITE AND 1012 YELLOW j .. PAINT - / I PPG INDUSTRIES: PITTSBURG TRAFFIC AND ZONE MARKING PAINT 22 LINE WHITE AND YELLOW I ' = "---1 O = 0 = • a = (J RODDA: TRAFFIC PAINT, WH11E 671 AND YELLOW 670 1 '.. • ' j, SHERIMN M1WAMS WHITE 829 WI AND YELLOW 829 12 ' ' I I ` i • M INSTALL 4°LINE AS SHOWN q \ \ �'I LINE SHALL BE PERPENDICULAR TO P THE FACE OF CURB 9" / QC 2 NOTES: - 1. 1. SYMBOL AND PAINT SHALL MEET CURRENT A.D.A. ACCESSIBILITY I. / I GUIDELINE REQUIREMENTS. 2.SYMBOL SHALL HAVE A BLUE BACKGROUND MEETING CURRENT j PROPOSED A.D.A ACCESSIBILITY GUIDELINE REQUIREMENTS. /l DENTAL OFFICE ACCESSIBLE PARKING SYMBOL / . ' 4" PARKING STALL LINE N.TS. / N.T.S. / \ \I\tbP/1 I INSTALL,{4 REBAR W}TH 12°REC EMBEDMENT / 7HRQUCH PRECAST SLEEVE. RECESS REBAR t '-jI 1/4"AND COVER HOLE WTH EPDXY SEALANT: _ � 1 SIKA LASTOMER-46, THUMB PUTTY. TYPICAL — BOTH ENDS OF WHEEL STOP AS SHOWN. , \\‘ • , i 1 I., r_ ' KASA ,_.w ' n architects, inc. a ‹...;..„,„/'�1--- _�__„_ 4119 NE Cesox E.Chaves As -~ -- PorsbrM.Oregon 97211 DRAINAGE CHANNELS 503.284.6917 S.W, DURHAM RD. . ?:o, wvn.casaRCb`am Schwindt • DRAINAGE CHANNELS Medical/Dental i ;-0 Office PRECAST CONCRETE WHEEL STOP Drive SW Sumrllerfield N.T S Tigard,Dragon CONSTRUCTION NOTES i�P# 1105 O INSTALL PRECAST CONCRETE WHEEL STOP PER DETAIL, SHEET 03.0 1 Harper �,� Mace* Sire PemM MUM 5,1072 P Houf Peterson �° ��,19424�� a O INSTALL 4'PARKING STALL LINE PER DETAIL, SHEET CIO ) \5 r,1 N g 0 •4 O INSTALL ACCESSIBLE STALL SWIPING PER DETAIL, SHEET CJ.D '(�/ fl ®INSTALL ACCESSIBLE STALL PARKING SYMBOL PER DETAIL SHEET C3.0 Righellis Inc. •oaccox V ■ �� 'O( ,6.,9° ��P LAYOUT AND y'ICHAEL p' PAVEMENT ik. __.--4 . 205 SE Spokane sin, Suns 200, Portland,OR 97202 — MARKING PLAN phone:503.221 1131 wvcn.hhpr.com fax:503.221.1171 IalwI : 12-31-13 I copyright NASA ArMlsas,Inc 201 TREE ASSESSMENT I Tree Die. crown { ` No. Inches Sate,.. 1 069elt t Wealth condition comments I Few&minor or Significant amoun:of fill placed over top of hall of root system on west T1 12 Norway Maple 2B x 23 Good correctable defects side of tree Moderate&non- Partial crown due to crowding of building west to west tree cant amount of .� \ T2 12 port Orford Cedar 65 x 23 Good .correctable defects Fill placed over half of root system on west side of tree. I 1 Tree has partial crown doe ro crowding by adjacent tree.Tree has lots ` ' ' ' 1 • —7:----5 = ` ' of One dead wood ttwpughout crown and has produced below average -- ' ` Moderate&non- annual Iwig growth for several years This suggests tree was in • 51 T3 30 Northern Red Oak 75x60 Fair oorreclable defects cleaning health. , / Tree has partial crown due to crowding by adjaoent tree.Tree has lots ,of fine dead wood throughout crown and has produced below average C C C C Moderate&flora- annual twig growth for several years This s.,ggesls Use was in C C C 1 T4 30. Northam Red Oak 75 x 60 Fair correctable defects declining health. Al // ..../ ' Moderate&non- f`/ I .' 4 TO 12 European Beech 55 0 20 Fair correctable defects Partial crown due to crowding Two stems at 6' Major defects or borer infestation and has lost major portions of the crown due 16 14 Shore Pine 30 x 23 Poor problems structural defects. 5,5,5, 3 4,3.5, Major defects or Pamal one sded crown that leans to east.Poor specimen with poor 6 I 4 17 3.5.3 Japanese Maple 15 x 25 Fair problems structure that is not correctable. • Schwedler Norway Moderate&non- I + Q T8 20 Maple 50 it 50 Good correctable defects Dense full crown with 2 stems at 5' Moderate&non- COVERED BIKE T9 12 Colorado Slue Spruce 55 x 25 Fair correctable defects Partial crown due to crowding by tree T8. RACK FOR (2) Note:Trees requiring mitigation planting are highlighted in yellow. { SPACES 79 'r Q • Tree Assessment by Pacific Resources Group-(503)222-4320 I ` �!/: / Ts •i ' T1. _ N 4.1.1 *-F.*:"./..—latf/ I..I ..,,Fv• . a o t t t O r 1 0 , Illtlir a MITIGATION SUMMARY Qa a ��-i� 4 1 ' TOTAL HEALTHY TREE INCHES ON SITE 80 ,:-- .. r + �1���� _'1 _jl • • ;4 -_ TREE INCHES TO REMAIN 0 �/ ill__ ' ,�—r 1 ON-SITE MITIGATION INCHES PROVIDED ..-47"-- !� I -;--4111 i z I, /'�� 1 ( ' ■ LrL� REQUIRED OFF-SITE MITIGATION INCHES J9" 5O ( 1\ V,i'V f�i� ,` •�►0' T5 T3 ,, </1 ° D - \ /'2 V) / . • ( I �I ,/ 11111 • 4 _ T4 CI) • PLANT SCHEDULE ` ./Oft 1►. at Ilkit /' I - TREES / i � X �1 9 EXISTING TREE TO BE REMOVED © KASA VARIES SEE TREE PLAN • _ �\ /r a. a ° • 4 ° a MONUMENT a Q architects, inc. _._ SIGN ,_._.__ _ .__. 4119 NE Casar E. Z Ae. Pwtlond,Oregon chove 97211 v 503.284.6917 • SW DURHAM RD "`ins°pa"°n' Schwindt Medical/Dental Office - 11445 SW Summerfield Drive Tigard,Oregon KASA Proj# 1105 . Harper ��s Permit fiat:March 20.2012 • '.l ' t• Houf Peterson [, . . _ FF Ti . o 0 10 20 40 Righellis Inc. ✓EOROCN REL • • TREE PAN SCALE 1"= 10' E N e I N E E R 9•P L A N N E R S "k„.,08/13111 • AN09CAPE ARCHITECTS•SURVEYORS 205 SE Spokane Sac, Suite 200, Portland,OR 97202 APE PE -. - phone:503.221.1131 www.hhpr.com far 503.221 1171 copyrght NAM Architect,,Inc.2012 PLANT SCHEDULE TREES 2. L2.0 'I4 --/� 7 Nyssa syfyatica - Black Tupelo 0 4" CAL B&B, WELL BRANCHED, LIMBED TO 6' 2''' ^1 4�TALL HEDGE SCREEN- 90%OPACITY Robinio.pseudoacacio 'Frisia' - Frisio Honeytocust J I <' TALL HEDGE SCREEN -2" CAL B&B, WELL BRANCHED, LIMBED TO 6' I Sox OPACITY rr \ 1:4130701,0 Anteleln - —I.. 11 1 NarthCatalpa 1 9 �tO ���-�` yr• ►��,i�I,4" CAL IlatadiP, 6' O /,/1� 'O�CD O) �4 l0 o�6 Styyrraanese Snoell II v }_ � �/ I�3 CAL B&B, D TO 6" 4 4 / 4' TALL ® �� `—�a /=HEDG OPACITY �,_i 'Ir LU� i ; - 90X cD 1 Trachycorpus Fortunei - Chinese Wndmill Palm • 4'TALL HEDGE SCREEN Ali I !`y`�, 8"BTH }B&B, WELL BRANCHED, LIMBED TO 6' I - soa OPACITY o��►�4.: e. ..o•. IN. ❖'••:❖f %al 1ILi•i i i❖• 4 SHRUBS 3 �'1 L20 � I�r'`� •�.,_ iI_I 1 Choisyo temato 'Sundance'- Sundance Orange Blossom 10„,s.4-)A-1 I /.•' .:'--7r0 0 0 5 GAL CONT., FULL PLANTS, SPACING AS SHOWN - •1�❖:��j!a` c / I5 TALL x 5' WIDE (PRUNNED) - EVERGREEN w� I :�:�'-;;:•:: l:�/ od. .„q.•.• I . 0 48 Abelio x grondiflora - Glossy Abelia I I ;•' .�;•;•;•;�; 2 GAL ONT., FULL PLANTS, SPACING AS SHOWN ` 4 \ � ':!:o'''•:•:;:,;.! 4' TALL x 4' WIDE (PRUNNED) - EVERGREEN af' _; T=- 1 •�X01,0 :5_j. O 20 Berberis thunbergii Atr u urea'- Red Leaf Japanese Barberry D \ '••�''! ~ ��, SHOWN Y c ��� •• ,4�;,�:. g 0p rp e -j •�'i►try-•• 5 GAL CONL, FULL PLANTS, SPACING AS r.-�== 3' TALL x 4' WIDE (PRUNNED) - DECIDUOUS o` a aG a ' 1• 115 Pennisetum 'Princess Caroline' •'� ��f ;j• 1 GAL CONL, FULL PLANTS, SPACING AS SHOWN e I 1 = - - - r- �IS4Sf cr 30” TALL x 30" WIDE - DECIDUOUS , •f-•• 4 tl�% 0 12 Ilex glabra 'Compo91a' - Compact Inkberry 411' AIWA O 3 GAL CONT., FULL PLANTS, SPACING AS SHOWN ` ,'��!I;f� BUFFER- 10'MIN. 4' TALL x 4' WIDE - EVERGREEN 1 f, 1 15 Hibiscus s locus 'Ancona Two'- Lilkim Rose of Sharon • 1 f%:4 • \ Q 5 GAL CONT., FULL PLANTS, SPACING AS SHOWN , �I����Pt' 4 4 TALL x 3' WIDE DECIDUOUS �,1; I 105 Trachelospermym agioticum - Asian Star Jasmine �� ° ® 2 GAL CONT., FULL PLANTS, SPACING AS SHOWN ` JI 4\ 18" TALL x 3' WIDE - EVERGREEN to �-I) ` 43 Gardenia psminoides Kleim's Hardy' Kleim's Hardy Gardenia �! �� :r 2 GALCONT, FULL PLANTS, SPACING AS SHOWN '�`.r' 'a Q�+M�<'1��`•2' TALL x 2' WIDE - EVERGREEN 1■j 4 i..,0''"'`.6"""0111414.411\ d • 3 Farqesia robusto 'Green Screen'- Green Screen Bamboo ‘47.:;Vela �'o m� 41p1► 2 GAL CONT., FULL PLANTS, SPACING As SHOWN 0'�r,p4.'��'���, i O � _ w ��� 4.4�e*E.t ♦it-a►;� S, �►" 9 1► 1!'� ��X41'� •�� �'��� �+1`1 v���j������ ►� chteinc10 3corus calamus Varieoatus - Striped Sweet Flag i►(1►(1►�U►(r►∎(1►(1►���/�(Ili(r►i<I►o/s►i�1�i�11►ill►i/r�41►i�1►i�1►ill►i/r►i<I►i�1�i�14<I►i�1�i�1►�l�:1 llY(r►�/1;,/1►/I►(1►(1►1,11114 36" O.C. -.. 0:444A10.416 r►_�(10 10 44∎11:11►�(1►_�(Ili_4114r►!11►QIl!_(0411X11►!Ir►!_4r►�(r►_(1t40.41,4∎1�(11!04Dpi44.--111 �i,0404a2';'7 I , 3' TALL x 3' WIDE - EVERGREEN ION..•.. a.=d �" 1 4�� Vel t rla.. _>.z.•Y40_4...Ali,- 4119 NE Cesar E.Chavez Ave. 44.. . 1 1111 I 1 1 0 I I 1 1 1 I I 1 I f i ` 4 Pornand.Oregon 97211 GROUNDCOVER `� O�ii�`�u���i5������,`��`�`�`�����I`�•_y�`���`, `• ®I `�\/�`�\_`�\`�`��``�_��\_\��\—'_�\\_�- `, 503.264.6917 www.kasapcc.com d d �� a V�_ Medical/Dental \\\\ 370 24" 0 pentalobus - Creeping Bramble `\`\`\`\"` '`Y=� _ M6(�iCellDental 4" PO 24" O.C. �`�`�`�_ ,►�`�`�`��`�`��_i`� � • W ■1111.11111"" Of Ce TREE LIMBED TO 8' r 110 IPennisetum alopecuroides 'little bunny'- Dwarf Fountain Grass D 11445 SWSummerfield �; 1 GAL CONT., FULL PLANTS, 18" O.C. Drive TREE UMBEO TO 8' Tigard,Oregon TfjjjJJ 152 Imperata cdindrica 'Red Boron'- Blood Grass KASA Proj# 1105 %1111/, 1 GAL CONT., FULL PLANTS, 12" O.C. • Harper ,tsT SCR,Ap0113,2012 IF•'•'•••• c„,;,,„ Iwlsa - Berkeley Sedge ■ . 1 O ... ..... 198 y ■N �' ' Houf PetersonvIE ('�y 1a 0 5 70 20 Righellis Inc. .c=.- PLANTING PLAN SCALE: 1"= 10' 5 r S s • LAN°SC ✓ n,"2C C >'5 H/,,C,45 1141/98 205 SE Spokane Street, Suite 200, Earthed,OR 97202 e4PE ARC phone:503.221.1131 www.h.hpr.com fax:503.221.1171 aepYn9M KA5A Aa7Y1e1,Int 2012 E el T N t'�''� 1 15' WIDE SEWER EASEMENT PER `" 25' WIDE RECIPROCAL ACCESS 1 11.1„,,,/j DOCUMENT FEE NUMBER 13, EASEMENT PER DOCUMENT NUMBER �� `�Y• ,,� RECORDED NOVEMBER 13, 1979, 85-079789, WASHINGTON COUNTY f + / I 'S\ WASHINGTON COUNTY DEED DEED RECORDS 1 RECORDS lr >' I• , NT 7„.......-________ .--------- V.,-''''..'-'--",,,----y I y1 r1 ,� q i S %j \ I I f j \ I I II / 1 o o t ` �/ \\ I F II 1 VISION 1 1 /�1\ 11 GLEARANG� I _ L_ I I I C C C C TRIANGLE / 1 , I 11 REMOVE EXISTING .i G 1 _.______.11 t / i 1 I 11- T -1I CURB AND PAVING 1 G II II POLE MOUNTED // 1 I 1===== J--_- -n-- 1 I ME i/�/ 4 1 E= o 1 I ELECTRICAL I I / 1 TRANSFORMER is. • i \\ --_-__-_� �_� I I 1 AND PAD NOTE SEE SHEET A7 FOR / • BOLLARD, SEE LUMINAIRE SCHEDULE. ' / /• 1 • I I COVERED BIKE PROPERTY LINE I I \ 1 1 i , y cJ RACK FOR (2) SEASEMENT I I SID WE EXISTING \\ t JI/' • y I SPACES, SEE s G I I SIDEWALK �_ /� 7/A6 1 I CV los 0 il ; . v , 1 A // / 11 I 7 „ r ) /....- 1 • I \ I I J \ T\ CC p 1L lit 1 I <i 4 0 0 0 0 I 1 i r I,I I I I ,4 /�/)I11�\ l5 r 1 �,.----- ;� k � 11 t -0' 0 1 / /I If I W ° GI W j 1 I BUILDING ACCESSIBLE \ t / / L • r I I / I MOUNTED PARKING SPACE, I I11 /I \ i/ /r 7--�" nl 1<. 11 LUMINAIRE, SEE 11/A6 LL / \ _��� �-1- -_--1--JJ / I / GASE METER BUILDING I 1 W _�.T I `-�- 4 A i I LUMINA RE TYPED II 1 6 c �.�{�i/ 1/40,,e. / ° REMOVE MS-MG 3 __s_ REMOVE EXISTING I /; I / ,I GROUND MOUNTED ,d I 4 CONCRETE POND 1 BUILDING AND 1 1 �I / ' 1 r 1 / FILLED WITH \\� DECK 1 BUILDING 1 Cl) � \��T �, �/i r- ROCKS _ �� 1 71� , `- LUMINAIRE TYPE 7 "Mt CCU' B, TYP.\(j /� Y� �\, J r--- -_ 1 °i1 / is FT. xis Fr. / G �' a a /./� • (-(G'wt JJ-- J r f`� \ L/ –7 I VISION CLEARANCE i-.t POrmiore, EGON \ \_ L/ . - \4 / ] TRIANGLE ! ' 4466 � +lop l \ J �t _ \�\ 1t/ , yr--- //''--REMOVE EXISTING REMOVE EXISTING � I �/ I / ( c',S;ar'Ph"I �y.- \_ \Jam/ - _-Y �/ TREE, TYP. MONUMENT SIGN / / "+ "' �7- c-r'C_ D"-- �� I v v � / i G� ://A 4' ,, \ -_ J \ 1 KASA / 7 l -,, \� 1 i , ) / 1 architects, inc. r w �. .\ 1 4 /�L11.411;\\\ I/� 1 Y L___ LL__-. _J -� / — — 4119 NE Cesar E.Chavez Ave. ..L�__ r 11,n\ /� .� I I Portland,Oregon 97211 _ __ __ _ __ �� �� �� �� ........„....• – V G w 503.284.6917 M CANOPY MOUNTED ww.kasapdx.com • BUILDING ..._-__._-._...-- -.—....-... ........ L... i '-'__-___._ ..----=a - - - LUMINAIRE TYPE L..._...-_._-f i SCwhindt _ ° c.TYP. CENTER — ~° Medical/Dental ° c G ° ON7MIDDLE G ---�' ° o ----3.._�,. ° ��.. WINDOW MULLIONa ° MONUMENT SIGN, .� BY OTHERS Office -------------. _ �_ .. BELOW._.SEE4T4 - _.-------.-. . 11445 SW Summedeld Dr. Tigard,Oregon SW DURHAM RD SW DURHAM RD KASAProj# 1105 Puma Sr Notch 20.2012 - Site Plan& . N ' N Demolition Plan j Site Demolition Plan _,. s 19 /�O Site Plan 01' T 10 Al 1•. 10'-0• � 1 \, 1•– 10'-0• i1f� copyright KASA ANMK/t,Inc.2012 1 r SILL BELOW • l. SHEET METAL FLASHING MI (FLASHING/13) t AIR BARRIER • 2x4 �Q MECHANICAL • SEALANT R BACKER ROD �_SCREEN BEYOND METAL ROOFING SHIM © I I I 1 ! METAL THIISN°PY' 1 I I ! !I !! I ! I ! ---.'lll��■.� ALUMINUM STOREFRONT • ELEVATION I mom-Y[ fib ~�� WINDOW _.- Wei - • 4C,I. CJ. 0:.L.tFaa mmm•IITIN m—m�Yi" I j •r= J' + J._ C.J.`-• 1II1Ii�_ =ir r_—_r—ai_a�. _.—+�_�___...0, NM�= - -m - ��-�_-1 -- ■mom mom■ -iii f•:r:"�:"�:_ -_ •�_mm e','. Al 4f':I. morays!:I [O O is -i. am FOR NOTE: SEE 6/A2 � rim NOTE:SEE 4.�y�■Y, , 1•w1-m mm eniimsame.a�ie.ie■ie-�.- >t,reraC•L261■.•■12MINIU11.IM ANSI W�Y■�B.111=mem■e■0121•ROd='"1 r 14111Mi11�1 Iree�YOaorq.M fo Y1:Y� a�B��Y UE..a ■Yrm• •HI• r■urM '.VII 1 1 . wn•rm■mwros ..mmwe.amm-®4 w�pmpprmweIr_w_'Y_ r■o r S[@?I>aW1rs■cmmw■i�fE- w�ELrS1EAlEr m•r* FIN. FLR ■rm■m■.�FR161 •irk�mecas�■ ra•'.zmloYmmm o+�'°®r�raYO• I O South Elevation O Southeast Elevation O East Elevation 1/2"\ 1/2• SEALANT& BACKER ROD 7 1/8• - ,•-°" 4 1/a• 1'-°• 3 1/8• = '-G'. T/ • COLUMN • SILL BELOW MECHANICAL SCREEN BEYOND, TYP. Eh 10 Mullion at Column 0 CULTURED CURCULTURED STONE law VENEER,TYP. a SHEET METAL WALL MOUNTED MECHANICAL 3•- 1'-0• STOREFRONT LUMINAIRE TYPED SCREEN BEYOND .\_\. WINDOWS,TIP. , /COPING.TYP.I 4'C.M.U.VENEER \� �� 1 I > METAL SIDING,TM. I- - 'S'► `/ 3•RIGID INSULATION .- �r - fir. - ■ 1 I ••i ' 1 -i^x�i�l•S{�w•r.1Ymi•�•- ®�-•:o-•rte-�r2•r�"22"r4wr-^��®®�•- ___... J. _r__�_22∎•_-/ / MR BARRIER LAP OVER SHEET m- r--46-46 r - rr-r-r-r 11 ,. METAL FLASHING 4"MIN. .�•=e∎ mm•■-- •m :rrr..-.. ----a___� + �-. .rrr-r---��rrrrrrrr h ��� -- _�•_�q .we L°:LZ• T� ___perl�di■���i '. LkL or.∎∎— —M — — ∎�� ' PLYWOOD BO% FRME `i -•■■.�•�`'■�•■�■��_■�I r_.-ama•ia-•ia-•i izi.- - . Y© $$mmr_w-- -.rrrrrr� •• • �rmrrrr rrrrrrl ►�yAIR BAR rrr-- -- - -----o a .�����--rr.■Walla' 1i 1!��►���� / ' SHEET METAL FLASHING r1 �,,,��•■����•��.,,,,'o:i.i nui.�-.--.r�.��•_\. INsa m �•=■ rr _-�� ��_ r--r3 NOTE SEE 6 ME IV Y1i �_' SHEET METAL CLEAT II° -m •� ���jl .mr•■u. •• • �. . �=P rm..© -■-- __•'1" r rr-rrrr ••---r--mr FOR TYPICAL /A2•—SCJ�CL AiS e1.-- --s — io - �• �. �."1 mY.ur-�'�.�.7•-M�O�'-.Qm_m ...-_-_�--• ir• •► •rmmmmmr---m� _ ■ ____ �� I =- O �• O �•i-- O © �1•s�•_■..-t..-■..-■.. •r- • • rrr rr wag = rm_m_r_r_r_r_rr__S► rrrrrrrr--• NOTES. . _rte •1 . I ^ �• �. .- .mm•New m �vr-�■-•��•�-.�•��•• ra© •. •rrrrr• ©3 co ----r--_-- �• .---_-r----• • • WsIQ-r_-• MIMI. N�-IYR CWI .-rte,-Y-.rs.w...l.�—IYF_1911.11� rrrrr— m�t say.■'.t.��•�- mml•6r - �A .2 r•Tstfre.carr.r rrsimYr=112.a _ rS1.1Y a-r.nwa■-mrr..r m�_ n ro ea•� o• raY.. •n M semo�m ce�r.ve-i1u� FIN.FLR. •alrr•s..r.r•ra.•._v _©J Lr-i ue.wenmrr �. :► 14.pli Wa1mS°I..-riemrwmoaraaYm•1�.Y '. 1 .Y O■:_rm•Tailso.e.....••••••∎••11•.e-..w■Inr.-.IV ' 4.31Meei, MEMO W. .. OVERFLOW WALL MOUNTED \ SPLIT-FACE C.M.U. <'' LOWER, SEE 8/A2 I�' SEALANT k BACKER ROD DOWNSPOUT LUMINAIRE TYPE C. VENEER.TYP. SHIM O North Elevation NOZZLE, SEE 10/A4 TYP.AT ENTRANCE OVERFLOW • LOUVER 6 ,/8• = 1'-0" SEE 2/A7 DOWNSPOUT METAL West Elevation METAL CANOPY NOZZLE, SEE 7/A4 2 1/8•■ 1'-0• I SHIM SEALANT METAL eir BACKER ROD SHEET/ VEYOCALLATFJAMB TRIM EXTEND / 97'-e / mw�=•CI B7._4• • —---�_ CONT. CLEAT / 10-0 / / _ _ / 3W-4• / 23'-4" / 24'-8• / ��� II 1 / B'-0" /1'-a� 9'-a' 14'-B" y40' ,32•/ 18'-0• x,382"�.40•y 18'-0" y32•/ 61t:0, NOTE: JAMB CONDITION SIMILAR CANOPI STOR"x 7NT I© 1 ABOVE, �1�������� TO HEAD CONDITION. OMR STOREFRONT DOOR TYP N 10 4 CLEAT AND INSTALL CONT. E0. Eq. W/FULL LATE SHEET METAL FLASHING. _se-- SPANDREL GLAZING OVERFLOW Louver Head & Sill r-o• • \ I NOZZLE.11P. 44 / \ \ a`C �. O 3•• 1'-0• \ / E0. y EQ. 1 \ 4, 4'-0• / � i�� __ - l.1 V • 1 e �� •\ 8 RDWt ANTHONY SACTCN. ~ r ROOF DRAINS • m , ABOVE ROUTE TO o El E ;I . .. ' ". . . 465 I I 1. _ DOWNSPOUTS IN in in WALL.TYP. STOREFRONT DOOR e,;,, � �Q *_ - .. ■ ___ PR FDEL SIGN - v e? 'V '+ 111" 3'-6•% 8'-0• H.M. PROVIDE SIGN �• \ INSULATED DOOR. STATING, THIS =I n FlXm _ -.Alm! 1 ROOF HATCH DOOR TO REMAIN KASA gig- CEILING OF NITROUS O O O ABOVE. WITH UNLOCKED WHEN o A FIXED STOREFRONT 8 FIXED STOREFRONT C LOCATION WITH BUILDING IS e ROOM AT TOP LOUVER STOREFRONT INTERIOR WALL OCCUPIED,'SIGN •' architects, inc. 4�� 2 m' L= 1 OTHETRSN TALL LETERS ON LOCATE TOP LOUVER 12• + SHALL HAVE 1 INCH MAX.MA% FROM BELOW CEILING OF NITROUS + Q CONOTROUND. � ROOM 5j'il N 4119 NE Cesar E.Chavez Ave.• BACKGROUND. n ___• CENTER LOUVER OPENING If-6r / / 8.-6i. / ` \ Portland.28440179721 t WITHIN BLOCK MODULE www.kasapdK.com • 1 EQ. y E0. / / EQ. t Eq. / NOTE:ALL ' 1 DIMENSIONS ARE TO SCWhindt - - �'� _ \ e.. FACE OF MASONRY / • o -T — 'I 3/IR WALL.SEE U.N.O. /// 0 Medical/Dental A Office -- Al ©illrk ////4\ 0 11445 SW Summerfleld Dr. IL. � LOCATE BOTTOM LOWER 4 c Q _ -- c -- IV, 4`,/, Tigard,Oregon 12•MAX.ABOVE FLOOR f \ \ �° �T° A ►�J O OF NITROUS ROOM .. T \ L_ 1 -J 1 L — 1 J J L I J O ' � \ KASA Proj# 1105 — FLOOR OF NITROUS ROOM _ AT BOTTOM LOUVER T`` ° I A. I P•rrNL 5•t:Mra120.2012• ,.ST T T I I1I Q 4a ___ - }� N\ / -4• X 5-4• ,/ 9-0• , 9'-13* i s 9-0• / 9-0" < y. 9.-0* ,1, 9-0• < ■P Floor Plan&FIXED STOREFRONT E O FIXED STOREFRONT / 6'-0" / 10'-8" )4",„ 18'-0• 14*/ 18'-0• /24., 1e'-D• ,24/ N / 7(e-B• / 1a'-a• A Exterior Elevations OL1 o1/u2•v er Elevation O Window Types \O Floor Plan • 4' e A2 1'-O• „ 1,8 • 1'-0. copyright KASA Architects.Inc.2012 LUMINAIRE SCHEDULE Symbol Label Qty Catalog Number Description Lamp Lumens LLF Watts # 2 • AS1 LED 1 AS1 LED WITH HLM ONE 74.8-WATT LED, C 4 63B350/40K SR3 MODULE, 63 LED's, AIMED DOWN POS. Absolute 0.93 74.8 350mA DRIVER, 4000K COLOR TEMPERATURE, TYPE 3 LENS STATISTICS Description Symbol Avg Max Min Max/Min Avg/Min Calc Zone #2 1 .1 fc 2.9 fc 0.0 fc N / A N / A + _-__. + + 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.2 0.2 0.1 0.2 0.3 0.1 0.1 0.2 I. I. :. ., +0.0 0.0 0.0 /i 0.3---0-4 -±0-.. •.' 0.6 0.5 0.3 0.3 0.3 0.2 Ow 0.1 0.0 % uspo,r zr vcc accx+mc.c. CUSS -.WOO 791tl7- wTOOfT eve 10GUCNr WARR _R X}IR '1,vuawaTw +1 +0.2 +0.3 +0.7 +0.8 `1 • *'.2f- +1.1 0. 0.5 +0.7 +0.5 +0 +0.1 0.0 +0.4 +I i +1 c;'IMP VP...S; .8 1.6 � ► _-1 CLii ± +0� /.2 +0.1 � .1 4Il % 4 0.1 0. 1.2 .0 +2.7 +2.9 •.9 +27 +2. i +2.7 2.5 1 s. +1.3 O.' I.4 +0.1 0.', 1.4 2.1 2.8 2.8 2. •Sp84 .�: 2.7 2.6 2.5 I 1.:/ 0.3 0.1 .: .-' +2.5 '1.1 .5 +0.3 +0.2 gum 0.7 + .o -'� I ip r� \s .NIAlra! 1 Fit j f 1 j " �' i `. v ,/i- • 1.7 0.5 +0.3 +0.2 + / + -- ,ice 0.4 0.7 = �i,ll.6 ._ait:,�!�1�� '�s. +O.s +0.3y +0.2 +0.1 �.�,� ;����jr7�°i'i'�IVi tw' Plan View 0. 7 0.4 , 0.7 0.1 .AL' ' 04I O. + +a' . 7-'1: +0.1 +0.1 LL / GS I' a W Scale 1" = 32' 1 _- 17'0 LLi // nmvc - ' 4 0 NM % cur; v[r• fy ROOM y pip ��, a�,TRUNUE ° , i gt DORIGINAL 15532 SW Pacific Hwy#304 MICR R Tigard, OR 97224 �� -1E�� 1j Phone:503-625-4595 Fax:503-625-4870 -T email: office@evergreentsl.com. ISA CERTIFIED ARBORIST REPORT ''ECE1VED MAY ® 3 2016 April 27, 2016 CITY OF TIGARD KONA KIDS PLANNING/ENGINEERING 11455 SW Summerfield Dr. Tigard, OR 97224 I Eddie Aguirre, certify: I have personally inspected the trees at the property referred to in this report, and have stated my findings accurately. The trees that are currently planted on the property are the correct trees that needed to be planted. Four trees in front along SW Durham Rd. were changed to four lilac trees as approved by the city prior to planting. The trees are alive and in good health with normal foliage density and normal last year growth. The trees have good structure and accurate spacing. I further certify that I am a ISA Certified Arborist PN-8185A. I have been involved in the practice of Arboriculture and the care and study of trees for over l0yrs. Eddie Aguirre Certified Arborist Allrimm... L._ • • } =^te--•e-ci.,F• � ' n*§ Y ,-x .__�-- �,xx - : f ` ,:0`' 1,"'i ` r - -._z J,. — .__ **.•"-' -"-`- .7,,,i• ,• -kms.,., `'' ' X4,1=-1 , *. _ 3 r„_g - • Tom',P^- ,;q • S V. .. e.3 � - v/.tom : .-'1.:...1.74.A..3:4-_:,;"1.. . 7,3 .� o ,,➢ wr "' L fes''.' 4 .`ur t-;:it:' ys�..,j '.' , a r 6' .'7. `Jif' - •.. Sati' --�-� } �.rr i r � .r. t ."..r,',1 A ,h�x>• ' .,,. _ • , • • On the corner above is another Japanese snowbell (styrax japonicus). X. .�> ' "141=_ .vF-V ' x a.atm •'„,-.-....--7P0,, 3t..,�`� - oer .-.f t$ ..3 --14 5 7y as 4''1j'`xe' 'ix Ssr , ~ *^ [ y=AN' -s:-.-F-•4t-Fa.:-: 41-:4,_-4:':."4,4::,2.JF” ,G )f "4-1:4;..-5`"! - re,-''°+La'%'s'.,^,><-i7 *3 t'k-`s,-ii,WritC--2"L �, ,.., -OS 've ,4, i 'x' .>r it #1 '• �. Tw f `' .'- sr �!'.v. 4 ;_T 'f ` z, ✓ `�_!,� 3 ,1._._- u �. . ! =' j1 iN• I ;L.?' f i i' fir i[{J•1 es .I x , .1--, Above are two black tupelo(nyssa sylvatica). III a TIGARD City of Tigard June 3, 2016 CDBK Properties LLC Attn: Brandon J Schwindt 11445 SW Summerfield Dr Tigard, OR 97224 Re: Permit No. SDR2011-00003 Dear Applicant: The City of Tigard has processed a refund for the deposit of fees on the above referenced permit for the following: Site Address: 11445 SW Summerfield Dr Project Name: Schwindt Medical/Dental Office Job No.: N/A Refund: ® Check #221181 in the amount of$3,750.00. ❑ Credit card "return" receipt in the amount of$ . ❑ Trust account"deposit" receipt in the amount of$ . Notes: Applicant has fulfilled condition for mitigation tree planting. Refund 100% of cash assurance deposit. If you have any questions please contact me at 503.718.2430. Sincerely, 1' 12/19171-147--tC Dianna Howse Building Division Services Supervisor Enc. 13125 SW Hall Blvd. • Tigard, Oregon 97223 • 503.639.4171 TTY Relay: 503.684.2772 • www.tigard-or.gov City of Tigard Accela Refund Request TIGARD This form is used for refund requests of land use, development engineering and building permit application fees. Receipts, documentation and the Request forPermitAction form (if applicable) must be attached to this request form. Refund requests are due to Accela System Administrator by each Wednesday at 5:00 PM. Please allow up to 3 weeks for processing of refunds. Accounts Payable will route refund checks to Accela System Administrator for distribution to applicant. PAYABLE TO: CDBK Properties LLC DATE: 5/26/2016 Attn: Brandon J Schwindt 11445 SW Summerfield Dr REQUESTED BY: Dianna Howse Tigard, OR 97224 LS TRANSACTION INFORMATION: Receipt#: 187106 Case#: SDR2011-00003 Date: 6/11/2012 Address/Parcel: 11445 SW Summerfield Dr Pay Method: Check Project Name: Schwindt Medical/Dental Offc EXPLANATION: Applicant has fulfilled condition for mitigation tree planting. Refund cash assurance of $3,750.00. REFUND INFORMATION: Fee Description From Receipt Revenue Account No. Refund Example: Building Permit Fee Example: 2300000-43104 • $Amount Tree Replacement Cash Assurance 260-0000-22000 $3,750.00 TOTAL REFUND: $3,750.00 APPROVALS: SIGNA / 1 •TE: If under$5,000 Professional Staff If under$12,500 Division Manager If under$25,500 Department Manager If under$50,000 City Manager If over$50,000 Local Contract Review Board FOR TIDEMARK SYSTEM ADMINISTRATION USE ONLY Case Refund Processed: Date: ‘/3//0::, BY 1:\Building\Refunds\RefundRequest.doc x 09/01/2010 City of Tigard • COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT 111 = Request for Permit Action TIGARD 13125 SW Hall Blvd. • Tigard, Oregon 97223 • 503-718-2439 • www.tigard-or.gov TO: CITY OF TIGARD Building Division 13125 SW Hall Blvd.,Tigard,OR 97223 Phone: 503-718-2439 Fax: 503-598-1960 TigardBuildingPermits@tigard-or.gov FROM: ❑ Owner ❑ Applicant ❑ Contractor ® City Staff Check(1)one C Q /1 .02,77.06-72_776-s L L REFUND OR Name: MTS: Brandon J. Schwindt INVOICE TO: (Business or Individual) Mailing Address: 11445 SW Summerfield Drive City/State/Zip: Tigard, OR 97224 Phone No.: .444-33-620-2 503 -'3a -6FV5.0 PLEASE TAKE ACTION FOR THE ITEM(S) CHECKED (✓): Oa,--656ElsICEID PERMIT APPLICATION. REFUN RMIT FEES (attach copy of original receipt and provide explanation below). ❑ INVOICE FOR FEES DUE (attach case fee schedule and provide explanation below). I REMOVE/REPLACE CONTRACTOR ON PERMIT (do not cancel permit). Permit#: SDR2011-00003 Site Address or Parcel#: 11445 SW Summerfield Drive Project Name: Schwindt Medical/Dental Office Subdivision Name: N/A Lot #: N/A EXPLANATION: Applicant has successfully fulfilled condition for mitigation tree planting. Therefore, original cash assurance of$3,750 may be refunded. Date: 5/4/16 Signature: Print Name: Lina Smith Refund Policy 1. The city's Community Development Director,Building Official or City Engineer may authorize the refund of: • Any fee which was erroneously paid or collected. • Not more than 80%of the application or plan review fee when an application is withdrawn or canceled before review effort has been expended. • Not more than 80%of the application or permit fee for issued permits prior to any inspection requests. 2. All refunds will be returned to the original payer in the form of a check via US postal service. 3. Please allow 3-4 weeks for processing refund requests. FOR OFFICE USE ONLY Route to Sys Admin: Date By Route to Records: Date , 7 By j Refund Processed: Date /b By Invoice Processed: Date By Permit Canceled: Date A By, -- Parcel Tag Added: Date By I:\Building\Forms\RegPermitAction_092314.doc COPY 15532 SW Pacific Hwy#304 T- ` Tigard, OR 97224 Phone:503-625-4595 Fax:503-625-4870 email: office@evergreentsl.com. ISA CERTIFIED ARBORIST REPORT RECEIVED April 27, 2016 MAY 0 3 2016 CITY OF TIGARD KONA KIDS PLANNING/ENGINEERING 11455 SW Summerfield Dr. Tigard, OR 97224 I Eddie Aguirre, certify: I have personally inspected the trees at the property referred to in this report, and have stated my findings accurately. The trees that are currently planted on the property are the correct trees that needed to be planted. Four trees in front along SW Durham Rd. were changed to four lilac trees as approved by the city prior to planting. The trees are alive and in good health with normal foliage density and normal last year growth. The trees have good structure and accurate spacing. I further certify that I am a ISA Certified Arborist PN-8185A. I have been involved in the practice of Arboriculture and the care and study of trees for over 10yrs. Eddie Aguirre Certified Arborist ,._ t;'.., Ai, 4.1140,Fa_ ,,_i, _ : ..,___._ _ .._ - f �.- _ _1 syr. r .. ' ,. r-- , .A` I •:-. p}( "' � ._.. .tg fir PYI rF r4' `. s _ dJ J 1 x��a� it f i IA r„ ii It ,i, , ..,, , ,111. 1 .,,, , r .r { Above are the four lilac trees that are planted along SW Durham Rd. 110- -- i . nw t ;1::-.1-2:4"..t , s i 1 . —r #3 ......., „,-r ---7–'' .{ 4. . 44► \ , i rz, , -. .- ii . , x ---- - Y J r Along the side walk are three Japanese Snowbells (styrax japonicus). E . r: _ On the corner above is another Japanese snowbell (styrax japonicus). � 'n T _ 'et e ;eei `;`-rs,. 4 , ,,( .c+ Y '41.'-' r mss- a''''clips.-- .� in,- i• - 2: - - r 'W.0--- 1st jyr -` �5-.011- % • y"zI ' A.:* FF _...rte- ---•_- s T..-,- " Above are two black tupelo (nyssa sylvatica).