The URL can be used to link to this page

SDR2009-00007 SDR2009 00007 AUTOZONE RETAIL STORE NOTICE OF TYPE II DECISION IN SITE DEVELOPMENT REVIEW (SDR) 2009-00007 C AUTOZONE RETAIL STORE TIGARD 120 DAYS = 07/08/2010 SECTION I. APPLICATION SUMMARY FILE NAME: AUTOZONE RETAIL STORE CASE NO.: Site Development Review(SDR) SDR2009-00007 PROPOSAL: The applicant is requesting Site Development Review approval for a 6,800 square foot retail store with associated parking and site improvements on an approximately 36,590 square foot (0.84-acre) site on Pacific Highway in place of a 3,500 square foot restaurant. APPLICANT: AutoZone-Department 8320 OWNER: Bar-Am,LLC Attn: Mitch Bramlitt Attn: Isaac Baruch 123 S. Front Street 1416 3`d Avenue Memphis,TN 38103 Seattle,WA 98101 LOCATION: 13405 SW Pacific Highway;Washington County Tax Map 2S102CB,Tax Lot 01802. ZONE: C-G: General Commercial. The C-G zoning district is designed to accommodate a full range of retail, office and civic uses with a City-wide and even regional trade area. Except where non-conforming,residential uses are limited to single-family residences which are located on the same site as a permitted use. A wide range of uses, including but not limited to adult entertainment, automotive equipment repair and storage, mini-warehouses, utilities, heliports, medical centers, major event entertainment,and gasoline stations, are permitted conditionally. APPLICABLE REVIEW Community Development Code Chapters 18.360, 18.390, 18.520, 18.705, 18.725, CRITERIA: 18.745, 18.755, 18.765, 18.780, 18.790, 18.795 and 18.810. SECTION II. DECISION Notice is hereby given that the City of Tigard Community Development Director's designee has APPROVED the above request subject to certain conditions of approval. The findings and conclusions on which the decision is based are noted in Section VI. SDR2009-00007 AutoZone Retail Store Decision Page 1 of 21 CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL THE FOLLOWING CONDITIONS SHALL BE SATISFIED PRIOR TO THE ISSUANCE OF SITE PERMITS AND BUILDING PERMITS: The applicant shall prepare y�are a cover letter and submit it, along with an supporting documents and/or plans that address the following requirements to the CURRENT PLANNING DIVISION, ATTN: HAP WATKINS, 503-718-2440. The cover letter shall clearly identify where in the submittal the required information is found: 1. The applicant shall submit fire flow demand calculations and flow test for the hydrant nearest the project site per TVF&R comments listed in SEC11ON VIII of this decision. Approved fire apparatus access roadways and fire fighting water supplies shall be installed and operational prior to any combustible construction or storage of combustible materials on the site. 2. The applicant shall provide revised plans that show the storm water control vault shown on Sheet 0.0 re-located onto private property from its current location in the planter strip, show the new parking lot storm drain lines re-located to the revised water control vault location, and show the direction of flow for the water detention system. 3. The applicant shall provide revised plans that indicate vision clearance lines at both approaches on plan sheets L1.0 and/or L2.0 which shall indicate no trees or other obstructions will restrict the vision clearance area. 4. The applicant shall provide revised plans to construct a relocated bus stop per Tri-Met comments listed in SEC,IION VIII of this decision. 5. The applicant shall contact Tri-Met two weeks prior to work in the right-of-way to allow for temporary location of the bus stop (Contact:Ben Baldwin,503-962-2140). 6. The applicant shall submit to the City a revised landscape plan showing street trees spaced appropriately as affected by the applicable Tri Met bus loading requirement and bus stop.re-location (subject to ODOT and Tri Met review and approval) listed in SECl'iON VIII of this decision. 7. The applicant shall position fencing as directed by the project arborist and detailed on tree preservation sheet L1.0. The applicant shall allow access by the City Arborist for the purpose of monitoring and inspection of the tree protection to verify that the tree protection measures are performing adequately. If work is required within an established tree protection zone, the project arborist shall prepare a proposal de the construction techniques to be employed and the likely impacts to the trees. The proposal shit be reviewed and approved by the City Arborist before proposed work can proceed within a tree protection zone. 8. The applicant shall have an on-going responsibility to ensure that the Project Arborist has submitted written reports to the City Arborist, at least once every two weeks as the Project Arborist monitors the construction activities from initial tree protection zone (113Z) fencing installation through the building construction phases. Tree protection measures may be removed and final inspection authorized upon review and approval by the City Arborist. 9. Prior to site work,the applicant shall submit a cash assurance (letter of credit or cash deposit) in the amount of $1,125 for the equivalent value of mitigation required (9 caliper inches of proposed mitigation tree planting x$125/caliper inch). 10. The applicant shall submit a written sign-off letter from Pride Disposal based on a detailed facility plan that demonstrates the design of the facility is consistent with TMC18.755.040.F. SDR2009-00007 AutoZone Retail Store Decision Page 2 of 21 The applicant shall prepare a cover letter and submit it, along with any supporting documents and/or plans that address the following requirements to the ENGINEEERRII DIVISION, ATTN: GUS DUENAS, 503-718-2470. -The cover letter shall clearly identify where in the submittal the required information is found: 11. Prior to issuance of the Site Permit, the applicant shall dedicate additional right-of-way along the SW Pacific Highway frontage to increase the existing right-of-way from 40 feet to 52 feet from its centerline. 12. Prior to issuance of a site permit, a Public Facility Improvement (PH) permit is required for this fproject to cover the work in the right-of-way and the on-site storm water detention and treatment acilities. Six (6) sets of detailed public improvement plans shall be submitted for review to the Development Engineer. NOTE: these plans are in addition to any drawings required by the Building Division and should only include sheets relevant to storm drainage, water quality and detention. Public Facility Improvement (PH) ermitplans shall conform to City of Tigard Public Improvement Design Standards which are available at City Hall and the City's web page (www.tigard-or.gov). An erosion control plan shall be provided as part of the PFI permit drawings. The plan shall conform to Clean Water Services Design and Construction Standards (Resolution and Order No. 07-20) Chapter 2.No work on-site shall commence until the erosion control permits are issued. 13. The PFI permit plan submittal shall include the exact legal name, address and telephone number of the individual or corporate entity who will be designated as the "Pennitee", and who will provide the financial assurance for the public improvements. For example, specify if the entity is a corporation limited partnership, LLC, etc. Also specify the state within which the entity is incorporated and provide the name of the corporate contact person. Failure to provide accurate information to the Engineering Department will delay processing of project documents. 14. Prior to issuance of the Site Permit the applicant shall obtain ODOT approval and permits needed for construction of the sidewalk, planter strip, water quality and detention facilities. A copy of the permit shall be provided to the City Engineering Department. THE FOLLOWING CONDITIONS SHALL BE SATISFIED PRIOR TO FINAL BUILDING INSPECTION: The applicant shall prepare a cover letter and submit it, along with any supporting documents and/or plans that address the following requirements to the CURRENT PLANNING DIVISION, ATTN: HAP WATKINS, 503-718-2440. The cover letter shall clearly identify where in the submittal the required information is found: 15. A Knox Box for access is required for this building. Contact the Fire Marshal's Office for an order form and instructions regarding installation and placement. 16. Prior to final building inspection, and prior to installation of any signage,the applicant shall submit a sign permit application for all proposed signage. 17. Prior to final building inspection the planning division shall be contacted to conduct an inspection to verify that the project was completed in accordance with this decision and the approved plans. 18. Prior to issuance of any Certificates of Occupancy,the applicant/owner shall record deed restrictions to the effect that any existing tree greater than 6" diameter maybe removed only if the tree dies or is hazardous according to a certified arborist. The deed restriction may be removed or will be considered invalid if all trees preserved in accordance with this decision should either die or be removed as hazardous trees. 19. Prior to Certificate of Occupancy the project arborist shall submit a letter to the City Arborist to certify that all of the mitigation trees were properly planted per the approved Tree Mitigation Plan in order to set the starting point of the two year tree establishment period. Failure to plant and provide documentation of mitigation tree planting by the project arbonst within 6 months of certificate of occupancy issuance shall result in the forfeiture of the cash assurance to the City's tree fund. SDR2009-00007 AutoZone Retail Store Decision Page 3 of 21 20. After the two-year establishment period, the applicant shall provide a re-inventory of the mitigation trees conducted by a certified arbonst in order to document mitigation tree survival, and compliance with the approved'Tree Mitigation Plan. The applicant shall prepare a cover letter and submit it, along, any supporting documents and/or plans that address the following requirements to the ENGINEERING DIVISION, ATTN: GUS DUENAS, 503-718-2470. -The cover letter shall clearly identify where in the submittal the required information is found: 21. Prior to a final building inspection, the applicant shall complete detention and water quality facilities. The applicant's engineer shall submit documentation to thelDeveloppme��nt Engineer certifying that the water giialitytreatment facilities are constructed in accordance with�WS standards. 22. Prior to final building inspection, the applicant shall enter into an agreement with the City on City. furnished forms for maintenance of the pnvate water quality on-site. That agreement will be recorded and the City will be periodically monitoring the facility for compliance with the terms of the maintenance agreement. 23. Prior to a final building inspection, the applicant shall provide the City with as-built drawins of the detention and water ivality facilities as follows: 1) 3 mil mylar, 2) a disk of the as-builts in `DWG" format, if available; otherwise "DXF" will be acceptable, and 3) the as-built drawings shall be tied to the City's GPS network. The appplicant's engineer shall provide the City with an electronic file with points for each structure (manholes, catch basins, water valves, hydrants and other water system features) in the development, and their respective X and Y State Plane Coordinates, referenced to NAD 83 (91). THIS APPROVAL SHALL BE VALID FOR EIGHTEEN (18) MONTHS FROM THE EFFECTIVE DATE OF THIS DECISION. SECTION III. BACKGROUND INFORMATION Site History Staff conducted a search of City records for the subject property and found that the site has been an eating drinking establishment, a permitted use since the site was developed. The site is bounded by a sell storage facility to the south and- est and a fast food eating establishment to the north. Vicinity Information: The subject site is located at 13405 SW Pacific Highway,WNTIM 2S102CB,Tax Lot 01802. The property is zoned subject as are all the abutting properties. The site fronts on Pacific Highway. Site Information and Proposal Description: The applicant is requesting Site Development Review approval to construct a 6,800 square foot AutoZone Retail Store with associated parking and site improvements on an approximately 36,590 square foot (0.84- acre) site.The new building will replace a 3,500 square foot restaurant.landscaping,street trees,replacement trees and 32 parking spaces are planned. A new sidewalk, planter strip and street trees will be placed along the front of the parcel and a Tri-Met bus stop will be moved to the south along Pacific Highway. SECTION IV. NEIGHBORHOOD COMMENTS The Tigard Community Development Code requires that property owners within 500 feet of the subject site be notified of the proposal, and be given an opportunity for written comments and/or oral testimony prior to a decision being made. In addition, staff has posted a notice centered on the frontage of the site visible from the street. No comments were received during the comment period from neighboring landowners or interested parties. SDR2009-00007 AutoZone Retail Store Decision Page 4 of 21 SECTION V. SUMMARY OF APPLICABLE REVIEW CRITERIA A. Zoning Districts 18.520 Commercial Zoning Districts B. Applicable Development Code Standards 18.705 Access Egress and Circulation 18.725 Environmental Performance Standards 18.745 Landscaping and Screening 18.755 Mixed Solid Waste and Recyclable Storage 18.765 Off-Street parking and loading requirements 18.780 Signs 18.790 Tree Removal 18.795 Visual Clearance C. Specific Site Development Review Approval Criteria 18.360 Site Development Review D. Street and Utility Improvement Standards 18.810 Street and Utility Improvement Standards E. Impact Study 18.390 Impact Study SECTION VI. APPLICABLE REVIEW CRITERIA A. ZONING DISTRICTS Commercial Zoning District: Section 18.520.020 Lists the description of the Commercial Zoning Districts. The site is located in the GG: General Commercial zoning district. The present use of the site is for a 3,500 square foot restaurant. The proposed use, Retail Sales, is listed in the use classifications under "General Retail" as a use permitted outright in the zone. Development Standards: Section 18.520.040.B states that development standards in commercial zoning districts are contained in Table 18.520.2: TABLE 18.520.2 DEVELOPMENT STANDARDS IN COMMERCIAL ZONES STANDARD C-G Proposed Minimum Lot Size None 36,590 sq ft - Detached unit - Boarding,lodging,rooming house Minimum Lot Width 50' App 249 ft Minimum Setbacks - Front yard 0' 52 ft - Side facing street on corner&through lots 0' - - Side yard 0' 62 ft&92 ft - Side or rear yard abutting more restrictive zoning district 0' - -Rear yard 0' 4ft - Distance between front of garage &property line abutting a public or private - - street. Maximum Height 45 ft 21 ft Maximum Site Coverage 85% 85% Minimum Landscape Requirement 15% 15% FINDING: As demonstrated in the table above,the proposed development complies with the underlying zone development standards. SDR2009-00007 AutoZone Retail Store Decision Page 5 of 21 B. APPLICABLE DEVELOPMENT CODE STANDARDS Access,Egress and Circulation(18.705): Walkways: 18.705.030(F) requires that on-site pedestrian walkways comply with the following standards: Walkways shall extend from the ground floor entrances or from the ground floor landing of stairs, ramps, or elevators of all commercial, institutional, and industrial uses, to the streets which provide the required access and egress. Walkways shall provide convenient connections between buildings in multi-building commercial, institutional, and industrial complexes. Unless impractical, walkways shall ix constructed between new and existing developments and neighboring developments; As described in the applicant's plans and narrative, on-site pedestrian walkways consistent with this standard are proposed between the parking area,the building, and the Pacific Highway nght-of-way. Wherever required walkways cross vehicle access driveways or parking lots, such crossings shall be designed and located for pedestrian safety. Required walkways shall be physically separated from motor vehicle traffic and parking by either a minimum 6-inch vertical separation (curbed) or a minimum 3-foot horizontal separation, except that pedestrian crossings of traffic aisles are permitted for distances no greater than 36 feet if appropriate landscaping, pavement markings, or contrasting pavement materials are used. Walkways shall be a minimum of four feet in width, exclusive of vehicle overhangs and obstructions such as mailboxes, benches, bicycle racks, and sign posts, and shall be in compliance with ADA standards; As described in the applicant's plans and narrative, on-site pedestrian walkways are proposed across the parking lot from the building to the right-of-way consistent with this standard. Required walkways shall be paved with hard surfaced materials such as concrete, asphalt, stone, brick, etc. Walkways may be required to be lighted and/or signed as needed for safety purposes. Soft-surfaced public use pathways may be provided only if such pathways are provided in addition to required pathways. The plan depicts concrete sidewalks at the building and striped asphalt to the new sidewalk in the right-of- way which meet the standard. Access Management: Section 18.705.030.H.1 states that an access report shall be submitted with all new development proposals which verifies design of driveways and streets are safe by meeting adequate stacking needs, sight distance and deceleration standards as set by ODOT, Washington County, the City and AASHTO. The proposed retail site will have two shared access points both existing,that will remain unchanged. One is a shared access via a signalized intersection to the south of the property and the other to the north is a 38.75 foot shared driveway. ODOT has indicated that these accesses are acceptable. A preliminary sight distance report was prepared December 16, 2009 by HDJ Design Group Case for b h accesses. The report found that both had sight distances equal to that required per both exceeded the minimum by a factor of 2. Since the accesses are to remain unchanged and the sight distances are satisfactory,this report is also a final sight distance report. This standard has been met. Section 18.705.030.H.2 states that driveways shall not be permitted to be placed in the influence area of collector or arterial street intersections. Influence area of intersections is that area where queues of traffic commonly form on approach to an intersection. The minimum driveway setback from a collector or arterial street intersection shall be 150 feet, measured from the right-of-way line of the intersecting street to the throat of the proposed driveway. The setback may be greater depending upon the influence area, as determined from City Engineer review of a traffic impact report submitted by the applicant's traffic engineer. In a case where a project has less than 150 feet of street frontage, the applicant must explore any option for shared access with the adjacent parcel. If shared access is not possible or practical,the driveway shall be placed as far from the intersection as possible. SDR2009-00007 AutoZone Retail Store Decision Page 6 of 21 Pacific I-iighwayis classified as an Arterial on the City's Transportation System Plan (TSP). Access to the site will be via the existing shared access to the north of the site and the shared access to the south of the site which is signalized. The northerly site access is approximately 250 feet from the access at a signalized intersection,thereby meeting this standard. Minimum Access Requirements for Commercial and Industrial Use: Section 18.705.030 provides the minimum access requirements for commercial and industrial uses: Table 18.70 .3 indicates that the required access width for developments with fewer than 100 parking spaces is one 30-foot accesses with 24 feet of pavement. Vehicular access shall be provided to commercial or industrial uses, and shall be located to within 50 feet of the primary ground floor entrances; additional requirements for truck traffic may be placed as conditions of site development review. The applicant's site plan shows both shared accesses exceed these requirements and are consistent with this standard. Environmental performance standards (18.725): These standards require that federal and state environmental laws, rules and regulations be applied to development within the City of Tigard. Section 18.725.030 (Performance Standards) regulates: Noise,visible emissions,vibration and odors glare and heat,and insects and rodents. Noise: For the purposes of noise regulation, the provisions of Sections 7.41.130 through 7.40.210 of the Tigard Municipal Code shall apply. Visible Emissions: Within the commercial zoning districts and the industrial park (IP) zoning district, there shall be no use, operation or activity which results in a stack or other point- source emission, other than an emission from space heating, or the emission of pure uncombined water (steam) which is visible from a property line. Department of Environmental Quality(DEQ) rules for visible emissions (340-21-015 and 340-28-070) apply. Vibration: No vibration other than that caused by highway vehicles, trains and aircraft is permitted in any given zoning district which is discernible without instruments at the property line of the use concerned. Odors: The emissions of odorous gases or other matter in such quantities as to be readily detectable at any point beyond the property line of the use creating the odors is prohibited. DEQ rules for odors (340-028-090) apply. Glare and heat: No direct or sky reflected glare, whether from floodlights or from high temperature processes such as combustion or welding, which is visible at the lot line shall be permitted, and; 1) there shall be no emission or transmission of heat or heated air which is discernible at the lot line of the source; and 2) these regulations shall not apply to signs or floodlights in parking areas or construction equipment at the time of construction or excavation work otherwise permitted by this title. Insects and rodents: All materials including wastes shall be stored and all grounds shall be maintained in a manner which will not attract or aid the propagation of insects or rodents or create a health hazard. This is a retail sales establishment use, which is permitted outright within the C-G zone. The applicant's narrative states that the above standards will be met. Based,on the provision of adequate trash and recycling area, and the fact that the proposed use is not likely to generate noise, visible emissions, odors, glare and heat, or harbor insects and rodents,this standard is satisfied. Landscaping and Screening (18.745): Street Trees: Section 18.745.040 states that all development projects fronting on a public street or a private drive more than 100 feet in length shall be required to plant street trees in accordance with Section 18.745.040.C. Section 18.745.040.0 requires that street trees be spaced between 20 and 40 feet apart depending on the size classification of the tree at maturity(small,medium or large). SDR2009-00007 AutoZone Retail Store Decision Page 7 of 21 The applicant has provided a landscape plan (Sheet L 2.0) that shows acceptable street trees along the frontage in the planter strip. However, the plan must be revised to incorporate the comments from Tn-Met regarding the re-construction of the bus stop passenger loading areas and re-location of the bus stop sign. Buffering and Screening: Section 18.745.050 states that buffering and screening is required to reduce the impacts on adjacent uses which are of a different type. Buffering and/or screening are required for dissimilar uses. The subject site is zoned GG and is either surrounded by abutting property zoned GG or a public right-of- way. Therefore,no buffering or screening is required. Screening: Special Provisions: Section 18.745.050.E requires the screening of parking and loading areas. Landscaped parking areas shall include special design features which effectively screen the parking lot areas from view. Planting materials to be installed should achieve a relative balance between low lying and vertical shrubbery and trees. Trees shall be planted in landscaped islands in all parking areas, and shall be equally distributed on the basis of one (1) tree for each seven (7) parking spaces in order to provide a canopy effect. The minimum dimension on the landscape islands shall be three (3) feet wide and the landscaping shall be protected from vehicular damageTy some form of wheel guard or curb. The parkin lot is comprised of 32 parking spaces. It is screened from ad acent properties to the north, west, and south by trees and-shrubs. The center of the frontage (east boundary is screened by trees and shrubs at the north and south ends with a 3 foot screen wall between. Street trees further enhance the screening from the right-of-way. The parking island tree plantings have been increased from 2 to 3 inch caliper to increase the canopy effect in lieu of placing one tree each seven parking spaces.This standard is satisfied. Screening Of Service Facilities. Except for one-family and two-family dwellings, any refuse container or disposal area and service facilities such as gas meters and air conditioners which would otherwise be visible from a public street, customer or resident parking area, any public facility or any residential area shall be screened from view by placement of a solid wood fence or masonry wall between five and eight feet in height. All refuse materials shall be contained within the screened area; There is adequate information provided in the plans to establish adequate screening of facilities. Therefore, this standard is satisfied. Screening of Refuse Containers. Except for one- and two-family dwellings, any refuse container or refuse collection area which would be visible from a public street, parking lot, residential or commercial area, or any public facility such as a school or park shall be screened or enclosed from view by placement of a solid wood fence, masonry wall or evergreen hedge. All refuse shall be contained within the screened area. The applicant's site plan and narrative describe a six-foot-high masonry trash enclosure. Therefore, this standard is satisfied. Mixed Solid Waste and Recyclables Storage (18.755): Chapter 18.755 requires that new construction incorporates functional and adequate space for on-site storage and efficient collection of mixed solid waste and source separated Recyclables prior to pick- up and removal by haulers. The applicant must choose one (1) of the following four (4) methods to demonstrate compliance: Minimum Standard, Waste Assessment, Comprehensive Recycling Plan, or Franchised Hauler Review and Sign-Off. The applicant will have to submit evidence or a plan which indicates compliance with this section. Regardless of which method chosen,the applicant will have to submit a wntten sign-off from the franchise hauler regarding the facility location and compatibility. The applicant has not submitted a letter from Pride Disposal that states the location of the facility is satisfactory. The applicant shall submit a detailed plan and written sign-off letter from Pride Disposal that demonstrates the design of the proposed facility is consistent with this standard. SDR2009-00007 AutoZone Retail Store Decision Page 8 of 21 Location Standards. To encourage its use, the storage area for source-separated recyclables shall be co-located with the storage area for residual mixed solid waste; Indoor and outdoor storage areas shall comply with Uniform Building and Fire Code requirements; Storage area space requirements can be satisfied with a single location or multiple locations, and can combine both interior and exterior locations; Exterior storage areas can be Focated within interior side yard or rear yard areas. Exterior storage areas shall not be located within a required front yard setback or in a yard adjacent to a public or private street; Exterior storage areas shall be located in central and visible locations on a site to enhance security for users; Exterior storage areas can be located in a parking area, if the proposed use provides at feast the minimum number of parking spaces required for the use after deducting the area used for storage. Storage areas shall be appropriately screened according to the provisions in 18.755.050 C, design standards; The storage area shall be accessible for collection vehicles and located so that the storage area will not obstruct pedestrian or vehicle traffic movement on the site or on public streets adjacent to the site. The recyclables container is accessed from the parking lot and is visible in order to enhance security for users. The proposed recyclables container will not occupy any required parking stalls and screening has been reviewed to show conformance to Tigard standards previously in this decision. Therefore, this standard is met. Design Standards. The dimensions of the storage area shall accommodate containers consistent with current methods of local collection; Storage containers shall meet Uniform Fire Code standards and be made and covered with waterproof-materials or situated in a covered area; Exterior storage areas shall be enclosed by a sight-obscuring fence, wall, or hedge at least six feet in height. Gate openings which allow access to users and haulers shall be provided. Gate openings for haulers shall be a minimum of 10 feet wide and shall be capable of being secured in a closed and open position; Storage area(s) and containers shall be clearlylabeled to indicate the type of materials accepted. The applicant has submitted a narrative and plans that reflect a 12 foot by 18 foot masonry waste and recyclable container enclosure with two 9 foot metal gates. Details of the enclosure and approval of the waste hauler have been required previously under this code section and this standard can be met conditionally. Off-Street Parking and Loading(18.765): Location of vehicle parking: Off-street parking spaces for single-family and duplex dwellins and single-family attached g dwellings shall be located on the same lot with the dwellings. street parking lots for uses not listed above shall be located not further than 200 feet from the building or use that they are required to serve, measured in a straight line from the building with the following exceptions: a) commercial and industrial uses which require more than 40 parking spaces may provide for the spaces in excess of the required first 40 spaces up to a distance of 300 feet from the primary site; The 40 parking spaces which remain on the primary site must be available for users in the following order of priority: 1) Disabled-accessible spaces; 2) Short-term spaces; 3) Long-term preferential carpool and vanpool spaces; 4) Long-term spaces. The parking lot associated with this project is directly adjacent to the proposed building. This standard is satisfied. Joint Parking: Owners of two or more uses, structures or parcels of land may agree to utilize jointly the same farking and loading spaces when the peak hours of operation do not overlay, subject to the ollowing: 1) The size of the joint parking facility shall be at least as large as the number of vehicle parking spaces required by the larger(est) use per Section 18.765.070; 2) Satisfactory legal evidence shall be presented to the Director in the form of deeds, leases or contracts to establish the joint use; 3 If a oint use arrangement is subsequently terminated, or if the uses change, the requirements of this title thereafter apply to each separately. Joint parking is not proposed with this application. Therefore,this standard does not apply. SDR2009-00007 AutoZone Retail Store Decision Page 9 of 21 • Parking in Mixed-Use Projects: In mixed-use projects, the required minimum vehicle parking shall be determined using the following formula. 1) Primary use, i.e., that with the largest proportion of total floor area within the development, at 100% of the minimum vehicle arking required for that use in Section 18.765.060; 2) Secondary use, i.e., that with the second largest percentage of total floor area within the development, at 90% of the vehicle parking required for that use in Section 18.765.060; 3) Subsequent use or uses, at 80% of the vehicle parking required for that use(s) in Section 18.765.060; 4) The maximum parking allowance shall be 150% of the total minimum parking as calculated above. This proposal is not considered a mixed-use project as it will contain only a retail store. Therefore, this standard does not apply. Preferential Long-Term Carpool/Vanpool Parking: Parking lots providing in excess of 20 long-term parking spaces shall provide preferential long-term carpool and vanpool parking for employees, students and other regular visitors to the site. At least 5% of total long-term parking spaces shall be reserved for carpool/vanpool use. Preferential parking for carpools/vanpools shall be closer to the main entrances of the building than any other employee or student parking except parking spaces designated for use by the disabled. Preferential carpool/vanpool spaces shall be full-sized-per requirements in Section 18.765.040N and shall be clearly designated for use only by carpools and vanpools between 7:00 AM and 5:30 PM Monday through Friday . The proposed parking associated with the retail store development is for 32 spaces and does not provide long term parking. Therefore,this standard does not apply. Disabled-Accessible Parking: All parking areas shall be provided with the required number of parking spaces for disabled persons as specified by the State of Oregon Uniform Building Code and federal standards. Such parking spaces shall be sized, signed and marked as required by these regulations. The applicant has indicated that there will be two disabled-accessible parking spaces provided. According to ORS 447.233, incorporated through reference to the State Building Code, two such spaces are required. As shown,the site plan is in compliance with State and Federal requirements. Access Drives: With regard to access to public streets from off-street parking: access drives from the street to off- street parking or loading areas shall be designed and constructed to facilitate the flow of traffic and provide maximum safety for pedestrian and vehicular traffic on the site; the number and size of access drives shall be in accordance with the requirements of Chapter, 18.705 Access, Egress and Circulation; access drives shall be clearly and permanently marked and defined through use of rails, fences, walls or other barriers or markers on frontage not occupied by service drives; access drives shall have a minimum vision clearance in accordance with Chapter 18.795, Visual Clearance; access drives shall be improved with an asphalt or concrete surface; and excluding single-family and duplex residences, except as provided by Subsection 18.810.030.P, groups of two or more parking spaces shall be served by a service drive so that no backing movements or other maneuvering within a street or other public right-of-way will be required. The proposed access drives are shown on the site plan as two existing 37.75 foot paved accesses that are clearly marked with curbs and landscaped areas, and the parking area and access drives provide ample room to facilitate a forward entrance onto SW Pacific Highway. Visual clearance areas are shown on sheet C 5.0 of the plan. No changes are proposed for the accesses. Therefore, the standard for access drives has been satisfied. Pedestrian Access: Pedestrian access through parking lots shall be provided in accordance with Section 18.705.030.F. Where a parking area or other vehicle area has a drop-off grade separation, the property owner shall install a wall, railing, or other barrier which will prevent a slow-moving vehicle or driverless vehicle from escaping such area and which will prevent pedestrians from walking over drop-off edges. SDR2009-00007 AutoZone Retail Store Decision Page 10 of 21 There are no drop-off grade separated areas within the parking area. Therefore, this standard does not apply. Parking Lot Striping: Except for single-family and duplex residences, any area intended to be used to meet the off-street parking requirements as contained in this Chapter shall have all parking spaces clearly marked; and all interior drives and access aisles shall be clearly marked and signed to show direction of flow and maintain vehicular and pedestrian safety. The plans submitted show the parking spaces will be clearly marked with striping, consistent with this standard. Wheel Stops: Parking spaces along the boundaries of a parking lot or adjacent to interior landscaped areas or sidewalks shall be provided with a wheel stop at least four inches high located three feet back from the front of the parking stall. The front three feet of the parking stall may be concrete, asphalt or low lying landscape material that does not exceed the height of the wheel stop. This area cannot be calculated to meet landscaping or sidewalk requirements. The applicant's site plan and landscape plan (Sheet C 5.0) show complying wheel stops and protective curbs. The plans reflect that there will be no overhang of vehicles into landscaped area or sidewalks. Therefore,this standard is met. Space and Aisle Dimensions: Section 18.765.040.N states that: "except as modified for angled parking in Figures 18.765.1 and 18.765.2 the minimum dimensions for parking spaces are: 8.5 feet x 18.5 feet for a standard space and 7.5 feet x 16.5 feet for a compact space"; aisles accommodating two direction traffic, or allowing access from both ends, shall be 24 feet in width. No more than 50% of the required spaces may compact spaces. The applicant's plans show 9 foot width and 18.5 feet depth for parking spaces in all locations, and are adequate for ADA parking. Aisle width is 26 feet wide for two way traffic. Therefore,this standard is met. Bicycle Parking Location and Access: Section 18.765.050 states bicycle parking areas shall be provided at locations within 50 feet of primary entrances to structures; bicycle parking areas shall not be located within parking aisles, landscape areas or pedestrian ways; outdoor bicycle parking shall be visible from on-site buildings and/or the street. When the bicycle parking area is not visible from the street, directional signs shall be used to located the parking area; and bicycle parking may be located inside a building on a floor which has an outdoor entrance open for use and floor location which does not require the bicyclist to use stairs to gain access to the space. Exceptions may be made to the latter requirement for parking on upper stories within a multi-story residential building. The applicant's site plan shows two bicycle parking spaces on the north side of the building.These spaces are not in the loading area,parking aisles,or landscaping area. Therefore,this standard is met. Bicycle Parking Design Requirements: Section 18.765.050.C. The following design requirements apply to the installation of bicycle racks: The racks required for required bicycle parking spaces shall ensure that bicycles may be securely locked to them without undue inconvenience. Provision of bicycle lockers for long-term (employee) parking is encouraged but not required; bicycle racks must be securely anchored to the ground, wall or other structure; bicycle parking spaces shall be at least 21 feet by six feet long, and when covered,with a vertical clearance of seven feet. An access aisle of at least five feet wide shall be provided and maintained beside or between each row of bicycle parking; each required bicycle parking space must be accessible without moving another bicycle; required bicycle parking spaces may not be rented or leased except where required motor vehicle parking is rented or leased. At-cost or deposit fees for bicycle parking are exempt from this requirement; and areas set aside for required bicycle parking must be clearly reserved-for bicycle parking only. Outdoor bicycle parking facilities shall- be surfaced with a hard surfaced material, i.e., avers, asphalt, concrete or similar par material. This surface must be designed to remain well drained SDR2009-00007 AutoZone Retail Store Decision Page 11 of 21 The applicant has submitted plans showing two bicycle parking spaces that are not in a vehicle parking area, loading area, landscape area, or vehicle circulation aisle. The spaces are of adequate size and have sufficient space.Therefore this standard is satisfied. Minimum Bicycle Parking Requirements: The total number of required bicycle parking spaces for each use is specified in Table 18.765.2 in Section 18.765.070.H. In no case shall there be less than two bicycle parking spaces. According to Table 18.765.2 of the Tigard Development Code, the minimum bicycle-parking requirement for a Retail Sales Establishment use is 0.3 spaces per 1,000 gross square feet. Based on the proposed 6,800 square foot building, a minimum of 2 bicycle rack spaces are required. The applicant has proposed two bicycle parking spaces, consistent with this standard. Minimum Off-Street Parking: Section 18.765.070.H states the minimum and maximum parking shall be as required in Table 18.765.2. Table 18.765.2 states the minimum parking for a Retail Sales Establishment is 3.7 spaces per 1000 gross square feet. For the proposed 6,800 square foot building 25.16 spaces (3.7 x. 6.8.) are required. The site is within the Zone A parking area for purposes of calculating maximum number of parking spaces. The maximum number of allowed parking spaces is 34.68 (5.1 x 6.8). When fractional parking spaces are calculated, it is the City's policy to round up. Therefore, the minimum and maximum parking spaces required are 26 and 35, respectively. The applicant has proposed 32 spaces. This standard has been met Off-Street Loading Spaces: Commercial, industrial and institutional buildings or structures to be built or altered which receive and distribute material or merchandise by truck shall provide and maintain off-street loading and maneuvering space as follows: A minimum of one loading space is required for buildings with 10,000 gross square feet or more; A minimum of two loading spaces for buildings with 40,000 gross square feet or more. The proposed building is less than 10,000 square feet.Therefore,this standard does not apply. Signs (18.780): Chapter 18.780.130.0 lists the type of allowable signs and sign area permitted in the C-G Zoning District. The applicant's narrative states that no application for a sign permit is included with this submittal. Signage will be reviewed and permitted under a separate application.Therefore this standard does not apply. Tree Removal (18.790): Section 18.790.030 requires that a tree plan for the planting, removal and protection of trees prepared by a certified arbonst shall be provided with a site develgopment review application. The tree plan shall include identification of all existing trees, identification of a program to save existing trees or mitigate tree removal over 12 inches in caliper, which trees are to be removed, protection program defining standards and methods that will be used by the applicant to protect trees during and after construction. A tree plan and arborist's report has been provided by the applicant and contains all of the required elements. Based on the arbonst report 2 of 3 trees over 12 inches diameter are to be preserved for retention of 66%. The tree to be removed-is 18 inches in diameter and 50% of the total inches removed require mitigation. The applicant is proposing to mitigate with 9 caliper inches of trees not required by other code provisions.Therefore,this standard is met. Visual Clearance Areas (18.795): Chapter 18.795 requires that a clear vision area shall be maintained on the corners of all property adjacent to intersecting right-of-ways or the intersection of a public street and a private driveway. A clear vision area shall-contain no vehicle, hedge, planting, fence, wall structure, or temporary or permanent obstruction exceeding three (3) feet in height. The code provides that obstructions that may be located in this area shall be visually clear between three (3) and eight (8) feet in height (8) (trees may be placed within this area provided that all branches below eight(8) feet are removed). A SDR2009-00007 AutoZ one Retail Store Decision Page 12 of 21 visual clearance area is the triangular area formed by measuring a 30-foot distance along the street right-of-way and the driveway, and then connecting these two (2), 30-foot distance points with a straight line. The applicant has indicated on sheet C 5.0 the acceptable vision clearance areas for both accesses. Therefore, this standard is met. FINDINGS: The applicant has provided evidence of partial compliance with the Mixed Solid Waste and Recyclables Storage standards. A waste hauler approval letter is required. The applicant has provided a landscape plan (Sheet L 2.0) that shows acceptable street trees along the frontage in the planter strip. However, the plan must be revised to incorporate the applicable Tri-Met requirements regarding the re-construction of the bus stop passenger loading areas and re-location of the bus stop sign. CONDITIONS: The applicant shall submit a written sign-off letter from Pride Disposal based on a detailed facility plan that demonstrates the design of the facility is consistent with TMC18.755.040.F. The applicant shall submit to the City a revised landscape plan showing street trees spaced appropriately s affected by the applicable Tri-Met bus loading requirement and bus stop re-location (subject to ODOT and Tri-Met review and approval) listed in SECI1ON VIII of this decision. CONCLUSION: Upon completion of the two conditions mentioned above, the application will be in substantial compliance with Part B, Applicable Development Code Standards of this section. C. SPECIFIC SITE DEVELOPMENT REVIEW APPROVAL CRITERIA Section 18.360.090(A)(2) through 18.360.090(A)(15) provides additional Site Development Review approval criteria not necessarily covered by the provisions of the previously listed sections. These additional standards are addressed immediately below with the following exceptions: The proposal contains no elements related to the provisions of the following and they are,therefore,found to be not applicable as approval standards: 18.360.090. A.3 (Multi Family Exterior Elevations); 18.360.090A5 (Privacy and Noise:Multi-family or Group Living Uses); 18.360.090A6 (Private Outdoor Areas: Multi family Use); 18.360.090A7 (Shared Outdoor Recreation Areas: Multi-family Use); 18.360.090.A.8 (100-year floodplain); and 18.360.090A9 (Demarcation of Spaces). The following sections were discussed elsewhere in this decision and, therefore, will not be addressed in this section: 18.360.090.A.4 (Buffering, Screening and Compatibility Between Adjoining Uses); 18.360.090.A.12 (Landscaping); 18.360.090.A.13 (Drainage); 18.360.090.A.14 (Provision for the Disabled); and 18.360.090.A.15 (Provisions and Regulations of the Underlying Zone). Relationship to the Natural and Physical Environment Buildings shall be: located to preserve existing trees, topography and natural drainage where possible based upon existing site conditions; located in areas not subject to ground slumping or sliding; located to provide adequate distance between adjoining buildings for adequate light, air circulation, and fire-fighting; and oriented with consideration for sun and wind. Trees shall be preserved to the extent possible. Replacement of trees is subject to the requirements of Chapter 18.790,Tree Removal. The applicant's plan has located the building in a considerate relationship with the natural and physical environment,consistent with this standard. SDR2009-00007 AutoZone Retail Store Decision Page 13 of 21 18.360.090.A.10 Crime Prevention and Safety: a. Windows shall be located so that areas vulnerable to crime can be surveyed by the occupants; b. Interior laundry and service areas shall be located in a way that they can be observed by others; c. Mail boxes shall be located in lighted areas having vehicular or pedestrian traffic; d. The exterior lighting levels shall be selected and the angles shall be oriented towards areas vulnerable to crime; and e. Light fixtures shall be provided in areas having heavy pedestrian or vehicular traffic and in potentially dangerous areas such as parking lots, stairs, ramps and abrupt grade changes. Fixtures shall be placed at a height so that light patterns overlap at a height of seven feet, which is sufficient to illuminate a person. The areas most vulnerable to crime are well lighted as shown on sheet G1 of the plans. The City of Tigard Police Department has reviewed the proposal and has no objections.Therefore this standard is satisfied. Public Transit: Provisions within the plan shall be included for providing for transit if the development proposal is adjacent to an existing or proposed transit route; the requirements for transit facilities shall be based on: the location of other transit facilities in the area; and the size and type of the proposal. The following facilities may be required after City and Tri-Met review: bus stop shelters; turnouts for buses; and connecting paths to the shelters. Tri-Met was given the narrative and plans for the proposed development and provided these comments: This site is served by bus stop #4254 adjacent to the proposed AutoZone store. Ridership records indicate this stop should be designed for two passenger loading pads and re-located south of the present location. Revised plans will be required as a condition of approval FINDING: Based on the analysis above, these specific applicable development review standards can be met conditionally. CONDITION: Applicant shall submit plans that reflect a 10 foot loading pad designed to City of Tigard Sidewalk Standards beginning, 55 feet north of the crosswalk for the front door of the bus, a 10 foot lgandscape area without trees, and a second 10 foot loading pad. Street trees can be planted immediately south and north of the 30 foot bus stop. The sign will move approximately 77 feet south to the south edge of the bus stop. Applicant shall contact Tri-Met two weeks prior to commencement of work in the right of way so a temporary stop can be assigned (Contact:Ben Baldwin, 503-962-2140). CONCLUSION: Upon completion of the condition mentioned above,the application will be in substantial compliance with Part C,Specific Site Development Review Approval Criteria,of this section. D. STREET AND UTILITY IMPROVEMENTS STANDARDS Street And Utility Improvements Standards (Section 18.810): Chapter 18.810 provides construction standards for the implementation of public and private facilities and utilities such as streets,sewers,and drainage. The applicable standards are addressed below: Improvements: Section 18.810.030.A.1 states that streets within a development and streets adjacent shall be improved in accordance with the TDC standards. Section 18.810.030.A.2 states that any new street or additional street width planned as a portion of an existing street shall be dedicated and improved in accordance with the TDC. SDR2009-00007 AutoZone Retail Store Decision Page 14 of 21 Minimum Rights-of-Way and Street Widths: Section 18.810.030.E requires a 7-lane Arterial Street to have a 128 foot right-of-way width and 48-foot paved section. Other improvements required may include on-street parking, sidewalks and bikeways, underground utilities, street lighting, storm drainage, and street trees. The rigfht-of-w y requirement for Pacific Highway along the project frontage is 52 feet from centerline of the right-o -way. The applicant proposes to dedicate 12 feet of additional nght-of-way along the frontage to increase the existing nght-of-way from 40 feet to 52 feet from its centerline. With that dedication, the nght- of-way requirement will be met. The applicant proposes to construct a 10 foot wide sidewalk located 6 inches from the new property boundary along the frontage and a 7.5 foot wide planter between the sidewalk and the existing curb. Street trees will be planted where feasible within the planter strip. These improvements are the only street improvements required for this project.Therefore,this standard has been met. Future Street Plan and Extension of Streets: Section 18.810.030.F states that a future street plan shall be filed which shows the pattern of existing and proposed future streets from the boundaries of the proposed land division. This section also slates that where it is necessary to give access or permit a satisfactory future division of adjoining land, streets shall be extended to the boundary lines of the tract to be developed and a barricade shall be constructed at the end of the street. These street stubs to adjoining properties are not considered to be cul-de-sacs since they are intended to continue as through streets at such time as the adjoining property is developed. A barricade shall be constructed at the end of the street by the property owners which shall not be removed until authorized by the City Engineer, the cost of which shall be included in the street construction cost. Temporary hammerhead turnouts or temporary cul-de-sac bulbs shall be constructed for stub streets in excess of 150 feet in length. There are no future streets or extensions of streets through this development. Therefore, this standard does not apply. Street Alignment and Connections: Section 18.810.030.H.1 states that full street connections with spacing of no more than 530 feet between connections is required except where prevented by barriers such as topography, railroads, freeways, pre-existing developments, lease provisions, easements covenants or other restrictions existing prior to May 1, 1995 which preclude street connections. A full street connection may also be exempted due to a regulated water feature if regulations would not permit construction. No streets are being constructed or extended. Therefore,this standard does not apply. Section 18.810.030.H.2 states that all local, neighborhood mutes and collector streets which abut a development site shall be extended within the site to provide through circulation when not precluded by environmental or topographical constraints, existing development patterns or strict adherence to other standards in this code. A street connection or extension is precluded when it is not possible to redesign, or reconfigure the street pattern to provide required extensions. Land is considered topographically constrained if the slope is greater than 15%for a distance of 250 feet or more. In the case of environmental or topographical constraints,the mere presence of a constraint is not sufficient to show that a street connection is not possible. The applicant must show why the constraint precludes some reasonable street connection. There are no streets that could be extended to provide through circulation. Therefore,this standard does not apply. Grades and Curves: Section 18.810.030.N states that grades shall not exceed ten percent on arterials, 12% on collector streets, or 12% on any other street (except that local or residential access streets may. have segments with grades up to 15% for distances of no greater than 250 feet). Centerline radii of curves shall be as determined by the City Engineer. There is no proposal for street construction. Therefore this standard does not apply. Block Designs - Section 18.810.040.A states that the length, width and shape of blocks shall be designed with due regard to providing adequate building sites for the use contemplated consideration of needs -for convenient access, circulation, control and safety of street traffic and recognition of limitations and opportunities of topography. SDR2009-00007 AutoZone Retail Store Decision Page 15 of 21 Block Sizes: Section 18.810.040.B.1 states that the perimeter of blocks formed by streets shall not exceed 1,800 feet measured along the right-of-way line except: • Where street location is precluded by natural topography, wetlands or other bodies of water or, pre-existing development or, • For blocks adjacent to arterial streets, limited access highways,major collectors or railroads. • For non-residential blocks in which internal public circulation provides equivalent access. No new streets are proposed. Therefore,this standard does not apply. Section 18.810.040.B.2 also states that bicycle and pedestrian connections on public easements or tight-of-ways shall be provided when full street connection is not possible. Spacing between connections shall be no more than 330 feet, except where precluded by environmental or topographical constraints, existing development patterns, or strict adherence to other standards in the code. No new streets are proposed with this development,the bicycle lane is in place, and the sidewalk re-location is part of the plan.Therefore,this standard does not apply. Lots - Size and Shape: Section 18.810.060(A) prohibits lot depth from being more than 2.5 times the average lot width, unless the parcel is less than 1.5 times the minimum lot size of the applicable zoning district. There is no minimum lot size in the GG zoning district. The lot is rectangular in shape approximately 249 feet wide and approximately 128 feet deep. The of size and shape are consistent with the rot size and shape standard. Lot Frontage: Section 18.810.060(B) requires that lots have at least 25 feet of frontage on public or private streets, other than an alley. In the case of a land partition, 18.420.050.A.4.c applies, which requires a parcel to either have a minimum 15-foot frontage or a minimum 15-foot wide recorded access easement. In cases where the lot is for an attached single-family dwelling unit, the frontage shall be at least 15 feet. The subject property has approximately 249 feet of frontage on Pacific Highway,which is consistent with the lot frontage standard. Sidewalks: Section 18.810.070.A requires that sidewalks be constructed to meet City design standards and be located on both sides of arterial, collector and local residential streets. Private streets and industrial streets shall have sidewalks on at least one side. This project proposes to construct a 10 foot wide sidewalk with 7.5 foot wide planter strip. The sidewalk standard has been satisfied. Sanitary Sewers: Sewers Required: Section 18.810.090.A requires that sanitary sewer be installed to serve each new development and to connect developments to existing mains in accordance with the provisions set forth in Design and Construction Standards for Sanitary and Surface Water Management(as adopted by Clean Water Services in 1996 and including any future revisions or amendments) and the adopted policies of the comprehensive plan. Over-sizing: Section 18.810.090.0 states that proposed sewer systems shall include consideration of additional development within the area as projected by the Comprehensive Plan. Sanitary sewer service is available on site and the proposed structure will be served by__the existing sewer line. The load on the sewer line from the proposed use will be less than the previous use. There is no opportunity for additional development on or around this property. Therefore,this standard does not apply. SDR2009-00007 AutoZone Retail Store Decision Page 16 of 21 Storm Drainage: General Provisions: Section 18.810.100.A requires developers to make adequate provisions for storm water and flood water runoff. Accommodation of Upstream Drainage: Section 18.810.100.0 states that a culvert or other drainage facility shall be large enough to accommodate potential runoff from its entire upstream drainage area, whether inside or outside the development. The City Engineer shall approve the necessary size of the facility, based on the provisions of Design and Construction Standards for Sanitary and Surface Water Management (as adopted by Clean Water Services in 2000 and including any future revisions or amendments). The applicant proposes to construct facilities that address detention and water quality requirements for the development. The water quality and detention measures described in the narrative and shown in the plans and calculations are satisfactory; however any comments from ODOT listed in SEC I1ON VIII must be addressed. Effect on Downstream Drainage: Section 18.810.100.D states that where it is anticipated by the City Engineer that the additional runoff resulting from the development will overload an existing facility, the Director and Engineer shall withhold approval of the development until provisions have been made for improvement of the potential condition or until provisions have been made for storage of additional runoff caused by the development in accordance with the Design and Construction Standards for Sanitary and Surface Water Management (as adopted by Clean Water Services in 2000 and including any future revisions or amendments). Storm water detention is required and included in this proposal.Therefore this standard is met. Bikeways and Pedestrian Pathways: Bikeway Extension: Section 18.810.110.A states that developments adjoining proposed bikeways identified on the City's adopted pedestrian/bikeway plan shall include provisions for the future extension of such bikeways through the dedication of easements or right-of-way. No bikeways, bike lanes? or pedestrian pathways are required as part of this project. There is a pedestrian connection from the building to the sidewalk along the frontage and an existing bike lane. Therefore, this standard is met. Minimum Width: Section 18.810.110.0 states that the minimum width for bikeways within the roadway is five feet per bicycle travel lane. Minimum width for two-way bikeways separated from the road is eight feet. Pacific Highway is classified as an arterial, requiring a 6-foot bicycle travel lane, which is currently in place. Therefore,this standard is satisfied. Utilities: Section 18.810.120 states that all utility lines, but not limited to those required for electric communication, lighting and cable television services and related facilities shall be placed underground, except for surface mounted transformers, surface mounted connection boxes and meter cabinets which may be placed above ground, temporary utility service facilities during construction, high capacity electric lines operating at 50,000 volts or above,and: • The developer shall make all necessary arrangements with the serving utility to provide the underground services; • The City reserves the right to approve location of all surface mounted facilities; • All underground utilities, including sanitary sewers and storm drains installed in streets by the developer,shall be constructed prior to the surfacing of the streets; and • Stubs for service connections shall be long enough to avoid disturbing the street improvements when service connections are made. SDR2009-00007 AutoZone Retail Store Decision Page 17 of 21 Exception to Under-Grounding Requirement Section 18.810.120.0 states that a developer shall pay a fee in-lieu of under-grounding costs when the development is proposed to take place on a street where existing utilities which are not underground will serve the development and the approval authority determines that the cost and technical difficulty of under-grounding the utilities outweighs the benefit of under-grounding in conjunction with the development. The determination shall be on a case-by-case basis. The most common, but not the only, such situation is a short frontage development for which under-grounding would result in the placement of additional poles, rather than the removal of above-ground utilities facilities. An applicant for a development which is served by utilities which are not underground and which are located across a public right-of-way from the applicant's property shall pay a fee in-lieu of under-grounding. There are existing overhead utility lines alonngg.�the frontage on Pacific Highway. However, overhead power is high voltage at this location and undergrounding is not required. The applicant proposes to place the utilities serving their development underground and no fee will be collected for the high-power lines. Therefore,this standard is satisfied. ADDITIONAL CITY AND/OR AGENCY CONCERNS WITH STREET AND UTILITY IMPROVE ME NT STANDARDS: Traffic Study: As stated in the applicant's narrative, a Traffic Impact Analysis was not required for this application. The redevelopment and new use will reduce the number of trips generated to and from the subject site. Fire and Life Safety: Tiulatin Valley Fire and Rescue reviewed the application and their comments are listed in SECITON VIII and incorporated into the conditions of this decision. Public Water System: The City of Tigard is the service provider for water in this area. The proposed facility will obtain water service from the existing 2 inch service line located at the front of the property. Storm Water Quality: The City has agreed to enforce Surface Water Management(SWM) regulations established by Clean Water Services (CWS) Design and Construction Standards (adopted by Resolution and Order No. 00-7) which require the construction of on-site water quality facilities. The facilities shall be designed to remove 65 percent of the phosphorus contained in 100 percent of the storm water runoff generated from newly created impervious surfaces. In addition, a maintenance plan shall be submitted indicating the frequency and method to be used in keeping the facility maintained through the year. This project is required to provide on-site detention and water quality treatment. The project plans includes facilities to address both. Calculations have been submitted to support the facilities incorporated in the project plans.With the submittal of a maintenance plan,these requirements will be met. Grading and Erosion Control: CWS Design and Construction Standards also regulate erosion control to reduce the amount of sediment and other pollutants reaching the public storm and surface water system resulting from development, construction, grading, excavating, clearing, and any other activity which accelerates erosion. Per CWS regulations, the applicant is required to submit an erosion control plan for City review and approval prior to issuance of City permits. An erosion control plan is required as part of the project submittals prior to issuance of any City permits on the project. This includes submittal of an erosion control plan for demolition of the existing building unless it is incorporated as part of an erosion control plan for the entire project. This standard can be met conditionally. Address Assignments: The site has an existing address, 13405 SW Pacific Highway, and no changes are proposed. SDR2009-00007 AutoZone Retail Store Decision Page 18 of 21 FINDING: A storm water quality maintenance plan and an erosion control plan were not included in the proposal.These requirements can be met conditionally. CONDITIONS: A water quality facility maintenance plan shall be submitted to the City as part the required Public Facility Improvement permit application. An erosion control plan is required as part of the application for a demolition permit for the existing building. This plan can also reflect erosion control measures for site work and new construction. CONCLUSION: Upon completion of the two conditions mentioned above the application will be in substantial compliance with Part D,Street and Utility Standards,of this section. E. IMPACT STUDY Section 18.360.090 states, "The Director shall make a finding with respect to each of the following criteria when approving, approving with conditions or denying an application:" Section 18.390.040 states that the applicant shall provide an impact study to quantify the effect of development on public facilities and services. For each public facility system and type of impact, the study shall propose improvements necessary to meet City standard, and to minimize the impact of the development on the public at large, public facilities systems, and affected private property users. In situations where the Community Development Code requires the dedication of real property interests, the applicant shall either specifically concur with a requirement for public right-of-way dedication, or provide evidence that supports that the real property dedication is not roughly proportional to the projected impacts of the development. Section 18.390.040 states that when a condition of approval requires the transfer to the public of an interest in real property, the approval authority shall adopt findings which support the conclusion that the interest in real property to be transferred is roughly proportional to the impact the proposed development will have on the public. A project impact analysis was prepared by HDJ Design Group and submitted as part of the proposal narrative stating the following: Impacts to the City's transportation system will be minimal as the proposed use will result in a reduction in overall transportation impacts. There are no changes proposed to the existing bikeway system. This application has provided updated plans for storm water collection conveyance, treatment and detention. No additional mitigation measures are proposed with this development relating to the site's drainage system. These plans have been submitted to ODOT for review and the resulting comments are incorporated into the conditions of this decision. There are no impacts to the city's parks facilities anticipated with this application. This proposal will utilize the existing water service lateral and meter, and will require significantly less water than the previous use. The site is connected to existing sanitary sewer service with a 6-inch sewer lateral which will serve the new building. The proposed use will require less sanitary service that the previous tenant. The roposal is for an auto parts retail business, with all business related activities occurring within the building. Construction noise will be limited to the City of Tigard guidelines for construction hours. The applicant concurs with and proposes the dedication of 12 feet of property to the right-of-way along the frontage of Pacific Highway. FINDING: The project proposal adequately addresses the impact study standards. CONCLUSION: The application is in compliance with Part E,Impact Study,of this section. SDR2009-00007 AutoZone Retail Store Decision Page 19 of 21 SECTION VII. OTHER STAFF COMMENTS City of Tigard Arborist: The City Arborist has reviewed the proposal and his comments and conditions are incorporated into this decision in SECTION II. City of Tigard Building Division, Police Department, and Public Works: These City Offices were provided the proposal documents and had no comments or conditions regarding this land use decision. City of Tigard Development Engineer. The Development Engineer reviewed the proposal and his comments and conditions are incorporated into this decision in SEC I1ON II and SECIION VI. SECTION VIII. AGENCY COMMENTS Clean Water Services: Clean Water Services was provided a copy of the application documents and plans and has not responded. Applicable issues have been reviewedpby the City Development Engineer and conditions will be listed in SECTION II of this decision. Tualatin Valley Fire and Rescue: TVF&R has reviewed the proposal and offered the following comments in a letter dated April 13, 2010: Two fire hydrants are required for this project. Both fire hydrants shown on the submitted drawings must be capable of supplying the required fire flow. The applicant must submit fire flow demand calculations and Low test the hydrant nearest the project site. The required fire flow for the buildin g shall not exceed 3,000 gallons per minute (GPM) or the available GPM in the water delivery system at 20 psi whichever is less as calculated using IFC Appendix B.A worksheet is available from the Fire Marshal's °dice. Approved fire apparatus access roadways and fire fighting water supplies shall be installed and operational pnor to any combustible construction or storage of combustible materials on the site. A Knox Box for access is required for this building. Contact the Fire Marshal's Office for an order form and instructions regarding installation and placement. Oregon Department of Transportation: ODOT has reviewed the proposal and provided the following comments bye-mail on April 2,2010: Plan sheet 0.0 shall indicate direction of flow for the water detention system. The storm water control vault shown on Sheet 0.0 must be re-located onto private property from its current location in the planter strip. The new parking lot storm drain lines must be re-located to the revised water control vault location. Indicate vision clearance lines at both approaches on plan sheets L1.0 and/or L2.0 that indicate no trees will restrict the vision clearance area. On plan sheet L2.0 in the text for"Root Barriers",delete"with less than 8'width". Tri-Met: Tri-Met has reviewed the proposal plans and narrative and provided the following comments bye- mail March 30,2010: Add a 10 foot concrete pad to serve the front door of the bus and use the pad shown in the plans to serve the rear door of the bus. Provide 10 feet of landscaped area with no trees between the pads. Street trees can be placed immediately north and south of the 30 foot bus stop. The south end of the 30 foot bus stop is to be located approximately 55 feet north of the crosswalk.The bus stop sign is to be installed at the south edge of the bus stop, approximately 77 feet from its current location. The pads can be designed to City of Tigard sidewalk standards and can accommodate a 2% cross slope. SDR2009-00007 AutoZone Retail Store Decision Page 20 of 21 The applicant shall contact Tri-Met two weeks prior to work in the right-of-way to allow for temporary location of the bus stop (Contact:Ben Baldwin503-962-2140) Clean Water Services: CWS was provided the proposal documents and did not comment. Their standards will be addressed in the PFI application and erosion control plan. SECTION IX. PROCEDURE AND APPEAL INFORMATION Notice: Notice was posted at City Hall and mailed to: X The applicant and owners X Owner of record within the required distance X Affected government agencies Final Decision: THIS DECISION IS FINAL ON MAY 3,2010 AND BECOMES EFFECTIVE ON MAY 18,2010 UNLESS AN APPEAL IS FILED. Appeal: Tpe decision of the Director (Type II Procedure) or Review Authority (Type II Administrative Appeal or Type III Procedure) is final for purposes of appeal on the date that it is malted. Any party with standing as provided in Section 18.390.040.G.1. may appeal this decision in accordance with Section 18.390.040.G.2. of the Tigard Community Development Code which provides that a written appeal together with the required fee shall be filed with the Director within ten (10)business days of the date the notice of the decision was mailed. The appeal fee schedule and forms are available from the Planning Division of Tigard City Hall, 13125 SW Hall Boulevard,Tigard,Oregon 97223. Unless the applicant is the appellant,the hearing on an appeal from the Director's Decision shall be confined to the specific issues identified in the written comments submitted by the parties during the comment period. Additional evidence concerning issues properly raised in the Notice of Appeal may be submitted by any party during the appeal hearing,subject to any additional rules of procedure that may be adopted from time to time by the appellate body. THE DEADLINE FOR FILING AN APPEAL IS AT 5:00 PM ON MAY 17, 2010. estrons: It you have any questions, please call the City of Tigard Planning Division, Tigard City Hall, 13125 SW Hall Boulevard,Tigard, Oregon at (503) 639-4171. 4Cflkt/ PREPARED BY: Darrel p" Watkins DA" F Assistant fanner 5/3iC APPRO D BY: Ronald B.Bunch ATE Director of Community Development SDR2009-00007 AutoZone Retail Store Decision Page 21 of 21 6+�gTh�_,f iii rv; l / VICINITY MAP '1111101°.% , , ........__ _ .Tigard SDR2009-00007 F.Tigard� 9 _it 4wES Elerrlerea; , �` AUTOZONE STORE 4. nERRV DE« C.I. _ I p E Alk# ..5`•. /4,,.. • *C.:17i' �,N s>• 1< 7 f'ff Subject Site e. 1 I 1 ff n ,.,J p. r a z'n RI< ST f.! �- '_ •i ION .:,-`'lrlliIllIllrrqpy/;,,);J >-� i ft' 21 Or Jr J ii 7 kq . • Ai 10. or lael.„----- , __T , ,.. - ii,_, J 0-,,,, , ,--077 ,-,,c, .4.4* e/ \ 4 4,41(.1•Zs',/ -'ii''- Ntil 64;-)/Er VihiL Services Division. l' � Scale 1:4,000-1 in=333 h r) 111111 1111.1 // Map punted at 09:56 AM on 12-Mar-10 / c J/ `�� DATA NO WARRANTY.TY.R PRESEN SOURCES.THE CRY E ST THE . itivii.,%ii&elk J MAKES NO WARRANTY,REPRESENTATION OR GUARANTEE AS TO THE CONTENT,ACCURACY,TIMELINESS OR COMPLETENESS OF ANY OF THE -\ (..� DATA PROVIDED HEREIN THE CITY OF TIGARD SHALL ASSUME NO / LIABILfFO FOR ION ERRORS OMISSIONS OR INACCURACIES M!THE /1 INFORMATION PROVIDED REGARDLESS OF HOW CAUSED. 1 11! i '` - - Feet \` �` r � P41� \\ p 13125ySWIHallEBlvd 7 • r��AR MAPS Tigard,OR 97223 0 500 I w.6 ardor 1 I( ww0363rdocgov ir .. A wozehm sir 3756 ► Located In The SW%,Sec.2,T2S,R1 W,W.M. CITY OF TIGARD Approved.,. - � i t ( ITE i g i X. \ rittiztJr: !!, Approved : \. '\ ` \ Hill 1 f- ;r only the work as describe in: \\\ , ....^.."..^....../.1% No,am \\\ VINO y� e Li4c' Letter to: Follow VICINITY MAP (:)ti NOT TO SCALE Attach L :r 0 _ — f i E2,=.° 0 i u, __. T.__._. Date:...t.-1.y./-12---2-\.----_,7 r --- /� �� `-' cl mom. �� oil - 0 0 . I SITE INFORMATION: co 1 / PROPOSED BALDING AREA 6,186 SF 20% I PROPOSED PARKING AREA 20,6635E Bl% an ' ' — I fI I I TOTAL SITE AREA 33,801 SF M ■ PROPOSED AREA .. I TOTAL PAWING 32 SPACES aHCSPACES) `_+ .• _•� The NDA lot contains 23%Ye,�'+POB.,s. O :.y - -- M" AUTOZONE BUILDING 6,786 Square Feet I�) STANDARDS: REQ. PROPOSED Mon Lot Sao• Nom 0 84 fas. \ �� I �.11 Mn.Lot A8 ,. 50 NM 249 7 A. , ry12 Front SMbc% 01M 52' \ ASSYRIA .. _ S.S.ro.ck OIM 82' \\\ now STORAGE \\ i�\ BUL c i�'S ....�.... I• 1. 8 1 H I Maximum Lott - 85% SS% URI `\\ \„i `\\ '%/ I �' ... --.— - Sanimu Maximum anus - rile i 21 I. ` v/ nag MIME,rRrs 4 U nwommL.na>°wR sx sx /�/ \\ / o I.,;±A yy,,sue ' I, TRASH ENCLOSURE: re \ ! i . -• 1 W Ilm.,54.1nham1lllacomtrucLB Of mammy bbck n.lcl+ro er O I \ `\ I i T I .._ . . I � ,t cowEncw.RET.. BUILDING • i I____ I\�I•��- �7rA / O ^# �" 'f' °N _\\\:. ,V,4, •■•• SW PACIFIC HIGHWAY / O v -�-- - - PUBLIC A i SPHALT) --�-- -- Scale 1"=20' P _ "® ~ 111111111111111. 4 - 0 0 • S • 0F• JAN EAn RE V NM FIE11 Ca,MO 3050-10 . SP1.0 NOTICE OF TYPE II DECISION Er SITE DEVELOPMENT REVIEW(SDR) 2009-00007 AUTOZONE RETAIL STORE 120 DAYS = 07/08/2010 SECTION I. APPLICATION SUMMARY FILE NAME: AUTOZONE RETAIL STORE CASE NO.: Site Development Review(SDR) SDR2009-00007 PROPOSAL: The applicant is requesting Site Development Review approval for a 6,800 square foot retail store with associated parking and site improvements on an approximately 36,590 square foot (0.84-acre) site on Pacific Highway in place of a 3,500 square foot restaurant. APPLICANT: AutoZone-Department 8320 OWNER: Bar-Am,LLC Attn: Mitch Bramlitt Attn: Isaac Baruch 123 S. Front Street 1416 3'd Avenue Memphis, TN 38103 Seattle,WA 98101 LOCATION: 13405 SW Pacific Highway,Washington County Tax Map 2S102CB, Tax Lot 01802. ZONE: GG: General Commercial. The GG zoning district is designed to accommodate a full range of retail, office and civic uses with a City-wide and even regional trade area. Except where non-conforming, residential uses are limited to single-family residences which are located on the same site as a permitted use. A wide range of uses, including but not limited to adult entertainment, automotive equipment repair and storage, mini-warehouses, utilities, heliports, medical centers, major event entertainment, and gasoline stations, are permitted conditionally. APPLICABLE REVIEW Community Development Code Chapters 18.360, 18.390, 18.520, 18.705, 18.725, 18.745, CRITERIA: 18.755, 18.765, 18.780, 18.790, 18.795 and 18.810. SECTION II. DECISION Notice is hereby given that the City of Tigard Community Development Director's designee has APPROVED the above request. The findings and conclusions on which the decision is based are noted in the full decision, available at City Hall. THIS APPROVAL SHALL BE VALID FOR 18 MONTHS FROM THE EFFECTIVE DATE OF THIS DECISION. All documents and applicable criteria in the above-noted file are available for inspection at no cost or copies can be obtained for twenty-five cents (25 ) per page,or the current rate charged for copies at the time of the request. SECTION III. PROCEDURE AND APPEAL INFORMATION Notice: Notice mailed to: X The applicant and owners X Owner of record within the required distance X Affected government agencies Final Decision: THIS DECISION IS FINAL ON MAY 3, 2010 AND BECOMES EFFECTIVE ON MAY 18, 2010 UNLESS AN APPEAL IS FILED. T�A eal: rector's Decision is final on the date that it is mailed. All persons entitled to notice or who are otherwise adversely affected or aggrieved by the decision as provided in Section 18.390.040.G.1 may appeal this decision in accordance with Section 18.390.040.G.2 of the Tigard Community Development Code which, provides that a written appeal together with the required fee shall be filed with the Director within ten (10) business days of the date the Notice of Decision was mailed. The appeal fee schedule and forms are available from the Planning Division of Tigard City Hall, 13125 SW Hall Boulevard,Tigard, Oregon 97223. Unless the applicant is the appellant, the hearing on an appeal from the Director's Decision shall be confined to the specific issues identified in the written comments submitted by the parties during the comment period. Additional evidence concerning issues,properly raised in the Notice of Appeal may be submitted by any party during the appeal hearing,subject to any additional rules of procedure that maybe adopted from time to time by the appellate body. THE DEADLINE FOR FILING AN APPEAL IS 5:00 PM ON MAY 17, 2010. esti ■ns: For er information please contact the Planning Division Staff Planner, Dan-el "Hap" Watkins at (503) 718-2440,Tigard City Hall, 13125 SW Hall Boulevard, Tigard, Oregon 97223. WORRY MAP Maw mist N Oros 30142001140007 ■t u I• syd �. AUrOZONE STORE 111111 ■ ♦ i ��• Ihr ii:,/■ u r ,,":///: � .,,; UM Zi IX ill Or ��r�� e�A�fir• 111■ ■ Q.`5v 0:.0:- . ��„ ,.,,,,„.„ `--/-WI T fir /yip . g I'ot a E�, .w� . _:.�. i tilik %ib,�” y�ito,% r %maw NO o we , , illOPPOS Iw.O.nr QU70Z0II V E STORE NO. 3756 1 CITY OF TIGARD AliApproved... I ; �_JL 7! clhionally App wwwl II��1 F,r only the work dOnTlbe3In: i X, , \\ \ \ \ r_9MIt INC). QQ9-000DJ % \.. „7/7 \•` :19e lslk''�ir///ta:Follow �Zj j� O ,/ �Yr„E f}�! O Dote:Y-/i 1 ...",= � i --- wrotare wieun _■ O CO __..\ ,\= s ■'E ,.e'""" u1 all ' -— z t ry I �'l� i) ____ = == - '.o...`e. ", a -.. - O = I_ 7 tom- i 'At i -�_! /W ids�W=� � - - �. :ate - p: NOTICE TO MORTGAGEE,LIENHOLDER,VENDOR OR SELLER: THE TIGARD DEVELOPMENT CODE REQUIRES THAT IF YOU RECEIVE THIS NOTICE,IT SHALL BE PROMPTLY FORWARDED TO THE PURCHASER NOTICE OF PENDING LAND USE APPLICATION SITE DEVELOPMENT REVIEW TIGARD DATE OF NOTICE: March 12,2010 FILE NUMBER: SITE DEVELOPMENT REVIEW(SDR) 2009-00007 (Type II Land Use Application) FILE NAME: AUTOZONE RETAIL STORE OWNER: Bar-Am,LLC APPLICANT: AutoZone- Store Development Isaac Baruch Department 8320,Mitch Bramlitt 1416 3.1 Avenue 123 S.Front Street Seattle,WA 98101 Memphis,TN 3 8103 REQUEST: The applicant is proposing to demolish an existing building and construct a 6,800 square foot auto-related retail business on a .84-acre parcel. Site improvements will include a new building, 32 parking spaces and associated landscaping. A new sidewalk will be constructed along the front of the lot. Access ways will not be affected. LOCATION: 13405 SW Pacific Highway,Washington County Tax Map 2S102CB,Tax Lot 01802. ZONE: GG: General Commercial District. The GG zoning district is designed to accommodate a full range of retail, office and civic uses with a City-wide and even regional trade area. Except where nonconforming,, residential uses are limited to single-family residences which are located on the same site as a permitted use. A wide range_of uses, including but not limited to adult entertainment, automotive equipment repair and storage, mini- warehouses, utilities, heliports, medical centers, major event entertainment, and gasoline stations,are permitted conditionally. APPLICABLE REVIEW CRITERIA: Community Development Code Chapters 18.360, 18.390, 18.520, 18.705, 18.745, 18.755, 18.765, 18.795 and 18.810. YOUR RIGHT TO PROVIDE WRITTEN COMMENTS: Prior to the City making any decision on the Application,you are hereby provided a fourteen(14) day period to submit written comments on the application to the City. THE FOURTEEN (14) DAY PERIOD ENDS AT 5:00 PM ON MARCH 26,2010. All comments should be directed to Hap Watkins,Assistant Planner in the Planning Division at the City of Tigard, 13125 SW Hall Boulevard, Tigard, Oregon 97223. You may reach the City of Tigard by telephone at 503.639.4171 or bye-mail to hap(a?tigard-or.gov. ALL COMMENTS MUST BE RECEIVED BY THE CITY OF TIGARD IN WRITING PRIOR TO 5:00 PM ON THE DATE SPECIFIED ABOVE IN ORDER FOR YOUR COMMENTS TO BE CONSIDERED IN THE DECISION MAKING PROCESS THE CITY OF TIGARD APPRECIATES RECEIVING COMMENTS AND VALUES YOUR INPUT. COMMENTS WILL BE CONSIDERED AND ADDRESSED WITHIN THE NOTICE OF DECISION. A DECISION ON THIS ISSUE IS TENTATIVELY SCHEDULED FOR APRIL 26, 2010. IF YOU PROVIDE COMMENTS, YOU WILL BE SENT A COPY OF THE FULL DECISION ONCE IT HAS BEEN RENDERED. WRIT EN COMMENTS WILL I. JME A PART OF THE PERMANE PUBLIC RECORD AND SHALL CONTAIN THE FOLLOWING INFORMATION: . Address the specific"Applicable Review Criteria" described in the section above or any other criteria believed to be applicable to this proposal; . Raise any issues and/or concerns believed to be important with sufficient evidence to allow the City to provide a response; . Comments that provide the basis for an appeal to the Tigard Hearings Officer must address the relevant approval criteria with sufficient specificity on that issue. Failure of any party to address the relevant approval criteria with sufficient specificity may preclude subsequent appeals to the Land Use Board of Appeals or Circuit Court on that issue. Specific findings directed at the relevant approval criteria are what constitute relevant evidence. AFTER THE 14 DAY COMMENT PERIOD CLOSES,THE DIRECTOR SHALL ISSUE A TYPE II ADMINISTRATIVE DECISION. THE DIRECTOR'S DECISION SHALL BE MAILED TO THE APPLICANT AND TO OWNERS OF RECORD OF PROPERTY LOCATED WITHIN 500 FEET OF THE SUBJECT SITE, AND TO ANYONE ELSE WHO SUBMITtED WRITTEN COMMENTS OR WHO IS OTHERWISE ENTITLED TO NOTICE. THE DIRECTOR'S DECISION SHALL ADDRESS ALL OF THE RELEVANT APPROVAL CRITERIA. BASED UPON THE CRITERIA AND THE FACIS CONTAINED WITHIN THE RECORD, THE DIRECTOR SHALL APPROVE,APPROVE WITH CONDITIONS OR DENY THE REQUESTED PERMIT OR ACTION. SUMMARY OF THE DECISION-MAKING PROCESS: . The application is accepted by the City . Notice is sent to property owners of record within 500 feet of the proposed development area allowing a 14-day written comment period. . The application is reviewed by City Staff and affected agencies. . City Staff issues a written decision. . Notice of the decision is sent to the Applicant and all owners or contract purchasers of record of the site; all owners of record of property located within 500 feet of the site,as shown on the most recent property tax assessment roll;any City-recognized neighborhood group whose boundaries include the site; and any &ovemmental agency which is entitled to notice under an intergovernmental agreement entered into with the City which includes provision for such notice or anyone who is otherwise entitled to such notice. INFORMATION/EVIDENCE AVAILABLE FOR REVIEW: The application,written comments and supporting documents relied upon by the Director to make this decision are contained within the record and are available for public review at the City of Tigard Community Development Department. If you want to inspect the file, please call and make an appointment with either the project planner or the planning technicians. Copies of these items may be obtained at a cost of $.25 per page or the current rate charged for this service. Questions regarding this application should be directed to the Planning Staff indicated on the first page of this Notice under the section titled "Your Right to Provide Written Comments." 4Its f P ` f SDR2008-00007 NMI ■� " d- E'e-- 4 ■ , ' AUTOZONE STORE '1116 I * ��' � �� / Subject Site Illita 'Z'ir PARK Sf *Itt Iiik...:74,413,0:. ' -AI Ilirr4"9 t o■- ■ • NE a � ../ 941.111 � ," te a ; 5.101.0 In•MI1 A a / • so • .04 °° "" REQUEST FOR COMMENTS Hap Watkins From: SCHALK Steven B [Steven.B.SCHALK @odot.state.or.us] Sent: Friday, April 02, 2010 6:13 AM To: Hap Watkins Cc: GORDON Chad A Subject: AutoZone Retail Store comments from ODOT Hap, Sorry about the delay in returning comments. Below are my comments: • Plan sheet C3.0 should indicate direction of flow for the water detention system. • With the required 12' dedication, the storm water control vault shown on Sheet C3.0 needs to be relocated onto private property. This raised vault is currently located in the narrow planter strip at the TriMet bus stop and adjacent to a utility pole. • The new parking lot storm drain lines need to be relocated to the revised water control vault location. • Plan sheet C5.0, why does the sidewalk at mid point of frontage extend to the highway 50'± south of the bus stop? • Indicate sight distance triangles at both approaches on plan sheets L1.0 and/or L2.0. It appears the proposed trees will restrict sight distance. The engineers sight distance report apparently addresses current conditions. • Plan sheet L2.0, in text for"Root Barriers" delete "with less than 8' width". According to the ITE trip generation manual, a 3,500 sf high turnover restaurant and a 6,800 sf auto parts store would generate more or less the same amount of traffic, therefore no traffic study will be required. I didn't find any reported accidents at the mid-block access, and since the approaches on each side of this development are permitted and shared with adjacent properties, there will be no access issues to deal with Steven Schalk Dist 2A Access Management & Engineering Coordinator 6000 SW Raab Road Portland, OR 97221 Office (503) 229-5267 Fax (503) 297-6058 Steven.B.Schalk(a7odot.state.or.us 1 Hap Watkins From: Hap Watkins Sent: Friday, April 02, 2010 10:53 AM To: 'lonergant @hdjdesigngroup.com' Subject: AutoZone Comments Attachments: 1325_001.pdf Good morning Tom, I have just received the comments back from ODOT this morning and I have copied them in italics to this e-mail. I also received comments from Tri-Met and have copied them after ODOT. I have attached the sketch from Tri-Met. I will condition the site development review decision according to these comments. 4/2/10 6:13pm Sorry about the delay in returning comments. Below are my comments: • Plan sheet C3.0 should indicate direction of flow for the water detention system. • With the required 12'dedication, the storm water control vault shown on Sheet C3.0 needs to be relocated onto private property. This raised vault is currently located in the narrow planter strip at the TriMet bus stop and adjacent to a utility pole. • The new parking lot storm drain lines need to be relocated to the revised water control vault location. • Plan sheet C5.0, why does the sidewalk at mid point of frontage extend to the highway 50'± south of the bus stop?(see comments from Tri-Met) • Indicate sight distance triangles at both approaches on plan sheets L1.0 and/or L2.0. It appears the proposed trees will restrict sight distance. The engineers sight distance report apparently addresses current conditions. • Plan sheet L2.0, in text for"Root Barriers" delete "with less than 8'width". According to the II L trip generation manual, a 3,500 sf high turnover restaurant and a 6,800 sf auto parts store would generate more or less the same amount of traffic, therefore no traffic study will be required. I didn't find any reported accidents at the mid-block access, and since the approaches on each side of this development are permitted and shared with adjacent properties, there will be no access issues to deal with. Steven Schalk Dist 2A Access Management &Engineering Coordinator 6000 SW Raab Road Portland, OR 97221 Office (503)229-5267 Fax (503)297-6058 Steven.B.Schalk( odot.state.or.us 3/30/10 3:40pm Attached is a sketch of what would best serve Tri-Met s needs at the bus stop (loc. ID #4254) located adjacent to the proposed AutoZone store. I would like to add a 10'long concrete pad to serve the front door of the bus and use the pad already shown in the plans to serve the rear door of the bus. Both pads can be designed to City of Tigard sidewalk standards(200psi, 4"minimum depth etc.)and can accommodate a cross slope of 0-2%. As shown, the new bus stop will be located about 55'east of the crosswalk and 77' west of its current location. The 30'long bus stop area should be free of trees to improve the line of sight between bus operators and waiting patrons, but trees can be placed immediately east and west of the designated stop area. Please let me know if the pad already shown in the plans serves another purpose that conflicts with the bus stop placement. Sincerely, 1 Ben Baldwin Project Planner TM Transit Development 503-962-2140 DISCLAIMER E-mails sent or received by City of Tigard employees are subject to public record laws If requested, e-mail may be disclosed to another party unless exempt from disclosure under Oregon Public Records Law E-mails are retained by the City of Tigard in compliance with the Oregon Administrative Rules "City General Records Retention Schedule " 2 . III ■ City of Tigard ,\ RI) REQUEST FOR COMMENTS DATE: March 12.2010 TO: Mark VanDomelen, Building Official FROM: City of Tigard Planning Division STAFF CONTACT: Hap Watkins.Assistant Planner Phone: (503) 718-2440 Fax: (503) 718-2748 Email:hapatigard-or.gov SITE DEVELOPMENT REVIEW (SDR) 2009-00007 - AUTOZONE RETAIL STORE - REQUEST: The applicant is proposing to demolish an existing building and construct a 6,800 square foot auto-related retail business on a .84-acre parcel. Site improvements will include a new building, 32 parking spaces and associated landscaping. A new sidewalk will be constructed along the front of the lot. Access ways will not be affected. LOCATION: 13405 SW Pacific Highway;Washington County Tax Map 2S102CB,Tax Lot 01802. ZONE: C-G: General Commercial District. The C-G zoning district is designed to accommodate a full range of retail, office and civic uses with a City-wide and even regional trade area. Except where nonconforming, residential uses are limited to single- family residences which are located on the same site as a permitted use. A wide range of uses,including but not limited to adult entertainment, automotive equipment repair and storage, mini-warehouses, utilities, heliports, medical centers, major event entertainment, and gasoline stations, are permitted conditionally. APPLICABLE REVIEW CRITERIA: Community Development Code Chapters 18.360, 18.390, 18.520, 18.705, 18.745, 18.755, 18.765, 18.795 and 18.810. The Proposed Amendments are attached for your review. From information supplied by various departments and agencies and from other information available to our staff, a report and recommendation will be prepared and a decision will be rendered on the proposal in the near future. If you wish to comment on this application, WE NEED YOUR COMMENTS BACK BY: Friday March 26, 2010. You may use the space providedbelow or attach a separate letter to return your comments. If you are unable to respond by the above date, please phone the staff contact noted above with your comments and confirm your comments in writing as soon as possible. If you have any questions, contact the Tigard Planning Division, 13125 SW Hall Boulevard,Tigard, OR 97223. PLEASE CHECK THE FOLLOWING ITEMS THAT APPLY: We have reviewed the proposal and have no objections to it. Please contact of our office. Please refer to the enclosed letter or email. ✓ Written comments provided below: ._ C 7-Ertl � r Fes-P___Ac7t-.oJ'q-rte Sc (L.-- Crsk)b I Tic PrE1z be-m0 Id- t L_b(‘0G- 0 (Yrf- -t- C' c-T-15-6S Name&Number of Person Commenting: • R64.04.. Tualatin Valley qp�, fr1U Fire & Rescue 1 op T/ 2010 a April 13, 2010 1vGOAis-A G Hap Watkins, Assistant Planner City of Tigard Planning Division 13125 SW Hall Boulevard Tigard, OR 97223 Re: Autozone Retail Store (SDR) 2009-00007 Dear Hap, Thank you for the opportunity to review the proposed site plan surrounding the above named development project. Tualatin Valley Fire & Rescue endorses this proposal predicated on the following criteria and conditions of approval: 1) COMMERCIAL BUILDINGS - REQUIRED FIRE FLOW: The required fire flow for the building shall not exceed 3,000 gallons per minute (GPM) or the available GPM in the water delivery system at 20 psi, whichever is less as calculated using IFC, Appendix B. A worksheet for calculating the required fire flow is available from the Fire Marshal's Office. (IFC B105.2) Two fire hydrants are required for this project. Both fire hydrants shown on the submitted drawings must be capable of supplying the required fire flow. The applicant must submit fire flow demand calculations and flow test the hydrant nearest the project site. 2) ACCESS AND FIRE FIGHTING WATER SUPPLY DURING CONSTRUCTION: Approved fire apparatus access roadways and fire fighting water supplies shall be installed and operational prior to any combustible construction or storage of combustible materials on the site. (IFC 1410.1 & 1412.1) 3) KNOX BOX: A Knox Box for access is required for this building. Please contact the Fire Marshal's Office for an order form and instructions regarding installation and placement. (IFC 506) We trust this letter will be helpful with the final design of this proposal insofar as fire apparatus access and firefighting water supplies are concerned. If there is anything about this letter you do not understand, disagree with, or wish to discuss further, please call me. Sincerely, jOhlt JL Daclt" John K. Dalby, Deputy Fire Marshal II Tualatin Valley Fire & Rescue, North Division 14480 SW Jenkins Road Beaverton, OR 97005-1152 (503) 356-4723 North Division Office 14480 SW Jenkins Road, Beaverton,OR 97005 Phone: 503-356-4700 Fax: 503-644-2214 www.tvfr.com ripiCity of Tigaiu tT� >>��% r TDT—COUNTYWIDE TRANSPORTATION DEVELOPM TAX � Rate Calculation Worksheet e,,,...::,&..+ 'yt ;<-, rte,...s,� ..... - - ..s»•.£-1a . v- LC .-iir E APPLICANT /t7;17 z) DATE h( Z 9/-0 MAILING ADDRESS / 2 3 n . pw r 5r-- PREPARED Y ri/75 CITY/ZIP / PHONE M//1441/-5/7 ( 3 fly 3 PLANS CHECK 1 2009 ,00 TAX MAP# Z i / O Z 2 '3 cv ©� PROJECT TITLE SITUS#ADDRESS /34/15- �,,,,. -7-31.. e._ 7>A 0 - 1Z/1 ''H Gs '7' ._,e,-/..r- Z11J e_ FORMER USE(S) �'//f04 —lj/30//TDT V/04 -�4/30/// # CODE UNITS X RATE = AMOUNT DESCRIPTION'NOTES 931 5 x lig -�� 34/�� Cpri, , s-7,-- Al/%61 /6/ 2,s !g3 X TOTAL TDT,FORMER USE(S) PROPOSED USE(S) USE ITE # X RATE = TDT DESCRIPTION/NOTES# CODE UNITS AMOUNT / mG•aX/ 7` = �86V4/ A re ARTS ; S _ /- x _ 4,00.0,1 x = x TOTAL TDT,PROPOSED USE(S) 215I to ,1-513, 55-4z LESS TOTAL TDT,FORMER USE(S) — XI/ ! /5 S♦ ! 5-3 7 TDT INCREASE/(DECREASE) (54'V/ ) (INCREASE =TDT DUE) 7/ 517, /1(1 -7 - D PAYMENT METHOD 'J I �� CASH/CHECK IiiA-T-ES^ 3S �� '5vo • : I�,° F�i9eP : I—�4-hE� 2 / CREDIT -Zw,92iEP 4 yD ffj£e-, 6.i000 i- /2•8 e t- BANCROFT AGREEMENT (NOTE) i 'S2- /AK 'Es = , / y0 f ( 2� / `� DEFER TO OCCUPANCY ----. S7)65 , I/OFS/CD/FORMS/TDT Rate Calculation Worksheet.indd(Rev.4/22/09) ■ MEMORANDUM CITY OF TIGARD, OREGON DATE: March 16, 2010 TO: Hap Watkins, Assistant Planner FROM: Gus Duenas, Development Engineer RE: SDR2009-00007 Autozone Access Management (Section 18.705.030.H) Section 18.705.030.H.1 states that an access report shall be submitted with all new development proposals which verifies design of driveways and streets are safe by meeting adequate stacking needs, sight distance and deceleration standards as set by ODOT, Washington County, the City and AASHTO. The preliminary sight distance certification submitted is satisfactory. A final sight distance certification shall be submitted after construction of the site improvements and prior to a final building inspection. Because there are no driveway modifications proposed, the final sight distance certification should basically be the same as the preliminary submittal. Section 18.705.030.H.2 states that driveways shall not be permitted to be placed in the influence area of collector or arterial street intersections. Influence area of intersections is that area where queues of traffic commonly form on approach to an intersection. The minimum driveway setback from a collector or arterial street intersection shall be150 feet, measured from the right-of-way line of the intersecting street to the throat of the proposed driveway. The setback may be greater depending upon the influence area, as determined from City Engineer review of a traffic impact report submitted by the applicant's traffic engineer. In a case where a project has less than 150 feet of street frontage, the applicant must explore any option for shared access with the adjacent parcel. If shared access is not possible or practical, the driveway shall be placed as far from the intersection as possible. Not applicable. Section 18.705.030.H.3 and 4 states that the minimum spacing of driveways and streets along a collector shall be 200 feet. The minimum spacing of driveways and streets along an arterial shall be 600 feet. The minimum spacing of local streets along a local street shall be 125 feet. ENGINEERING COMMENTS SDR2009-00007 Autozone PAGE 1 Existing driveways are to be used. One is at a signalized intersection,the other is a shared driveway with the adjacent parcel. Street And Utility Improvements Standards (Section 18.810): Chapter 18.810 provides construction standards for the implementation of public and private facilities and utilities such as streets, sewers, and drainage. The applicable standards are addressed below: Streets: Improvements: Section 18.810.030.A.1 states that streets within a development and streets adjacent shall be improved in accordance with the TDC standards. Section 18.810.030.A.2 states that any new street or additional street width planned as a portion of an existing street shall be dedicated and improved in accordance with the TDC. Minimum Rights-of-Way and Street Widths: Section 18.810.030E and Figure 18.810.1 require a 7-lane arterial to have right-of-way varying from 124 feet to 128 feet. Other improvements required include sidewalks, bike lanes, underground utilities, street lighting, storm drainage, planter strips and street trees. The ROW requirement for Highway 99W along the project frontage is 52 feet from centerline of ROW.The applicant proposes to dedicate 12 feet of additional ROW along the frontage to increase the existing ROW from 40 feet to 52 feet from centerline of ROW. With that dedication, the ROW requirement is met. The applicant proposes to construct a 10-foot wide sidewalk located 6 inches from the new property boundary along the frontage,and a 7.5-foot wide planter between the sidewalk and the existing curb. Street trees will be planted where feasible within the planter strip. These improvements are the only street improvements required for this project. Future Street Plan and Extension of Streets: Section 18.810.030.F states that a future street plan shall be filed which shows the pattern of existing and proposed future streets from the boundaries of the proposed land division. This section also states that where it is necessary to give access or permit a satisfactory future division of adjoining land, streets shall be extended to the boundary lines of the tract to be developed and a barricade shall be constructed at the end of the street. These street stubs to adjoining properties are not considered to be cul-de-sacs since they are intended to continue as through streets at such time as the adjoining property is developed. A barricade shall be constructed at the end of the street by the ENGINEERING COMMENTS SDR2009-00007 Autozone PAGE 2 property owners which shall not be removed until authorized by the City Engineer, the cost of which shall be included in the street construction cost. Temporary hammerhead turnouts or temporary cul-de-sac bulbs shall be constructed for stub streets in excess of 150 feet in length. There are no future streets or extensions of streets through this development. Street Alignment and Connections: Section 18.810.030.H.1 states that full street connections with spacing of no more than 530 feet between connections is required except where prevented by barriers such as topography, railroads, freeways, pre-existing developments, lease provisions, easements, covenants or other restrictions existing prior to May 1, 1995 which preclude street connections. A full street connection may also be exempted due to a regulated water feature if regulations would not permit construction. Section 18.810.030.H.2 states that all local, neighborhood routes and collector streets which abut a development site shall be extended within the site to provide through circulation when not precluded by environmental or topographical constraints, existing development patterns or strict adherence to other standards in this code. A street connection or extension is precluded when it is not possible to redesign, or reconfigure the street pattern to provide required extensions. Land is considered topographically constrained if the slope is greater than 15% for a distance of 250 feet or more. In the case of environmental or topographical constraints, the mere presence of a constraint is not sufficient to show that a street connection is not possible. The applicant must show why the constraint precludes some reasonable street connection. N/A Cul-de-sacs: 18.810.030.L states that a cul-de-sac shall be no more than 200 feet long, shall not provide access to greater than 20 dwelling units, and shall only be used when environmental or topographical constraints, existing development pattern, or strict adherence to other standards in this code preclude street extension and through circulation: • All cul-de-sacs shall terminate with a turnaround. Use of turnaround configurations other than circular, shall be approved by the City Engineer; and • The length of the cul-de-sac shall be measured from the centerline intersection point of the two streets to the radius point of the bulb, and • If a cul-de-sac is more than 300 feet long, a lighted direct pathway to an adjacent street may be required to be provided and dedicated to the City. ENGINEERING COMMENTS SDR2009-00007 Autozone PAGE 3 N/A Grades and Curves: Section 18.810.030.N states that grades shall not exceed ten percent on arterials, 12% on collector streets, or 12% on any other street (except that local or residential access streets may have segments with grades up to 15% for distances of no greater than 250 feet). Centerline radii of curves shall be as determined by the City Engineer. N/A Access to Arterials and Major Collectors: Section 18.810.030.Q states that where a development abuts or is traversed by an existing or proposed arterial or major collector street, the development design shall provide adequate protection for residential properties and shall separate residential access and through traffic, or if separation is not feasible, the design shall minimize the traffic conflicts. The design shall include any of the following: • A parallel access street along the arterial or major collector; • Lots of suitable depth abutting the arterial or major collector to provide adequate buffering with frontage along another street; • Screen planting at the rear or side property line to be contained in a non-access reservation along the arterial or major collector; or • Other treatment suitable to meet the objectives of this subsection; • If a lot has access to two streets with different classifications, primary access should be from the lower classification street. The property is accessed via Highway 99W. Existing driveways will remain. Private Streets: Section 18.810.030.T states that design standards for private streets shall be established by the City Engineer. The City shall require legal assurances for the continued maintenance of private streets, such as a recorded maintenance agreement. Private streets serving more than six dwelling units are permitted only within planned developments, mobile home parks, and multi-family residential developments. N/A Block Designs - Section 18.810.040.A states that the length, width and shape of blocks shall be designed with due regard to providing adequate building sites for the use contemplated, consideration of needs for convenient access, circulation, control and safety of street traffic and recognition of limitations and opportunities of topography. ENGINEERING COMMENTS SDR2009-00007 Autozone PAGE 4 Block Sizes: Section 18.810.040.B.1 states that the perimeter of blocks formed by streets shall not exceed 1,800 feet measured along the right-of- way line except: • Where street location is precluded by natural topography, wetlands or other bodies of water or, pre-existing development or; • For blocks adjacent to arterial streets, limited access highways, major collectors or railroads. • For non-residential blocks in which internal public circulation provides equivalent access. Section 18.810.040.B.2 also states that bicycle and pedestrian connections on public easements or right-of-ways shall be provided when full street connection is not possible. Spacing between connections shall be no more than 330 feet, except where precluded by environmental or topographical constraints, existing development patterns, or strict adherence to other standards in the code. Lots - Size and Shape: Section 18.810.060(A) prohibits lot depth from being more than 2.5 times the average lot width, unless the parcel is less than 1.5 times the minimum lot size of the applicable zoning district. Lot Frontage: Section 18.810.060(B) requires that lots have at least 25 feet of frontage on public or private streets, other than an alley. In the case of a land partition, 18.420.050.A.4.c applies, which requires a parcel to either have a minimum 15-foot frontage or a minimum 15-foot wide recorded access easement. In cases where the lot is for an attached single-family dwelling unit, the frontage shall be at least 15 feet. Sidewalks: Section 18.810.070.A requires that sidewalks be constructed to meet City design standards and be located on both sides of arterial, collector and local residential streets. Private streets and industrial streets shall have sidewalks on at least one side. The development code requires a 10-foot sidewalk and 5-foot planter strip exclusive of curb along the Highway 99W frontage. This project proposes to construct a 10-foot wide sidewalk with 7.5-foot wide planter. This meets the minimum requirement for the frontage improvements. Sanitary Sewers: Sewers Required: Section 18.810.090.A requires that sanitary sewer be installed to serve each new development and to connect developments to existing mains in accordance with the provisions set forth in Design and Construction Standards for Sanitary and Surface Water Management (as ENGINEERING COMMENTS SDR2009-00007 Autozone PAGE 5 adopted by Clean Water Services in 1996 and including any future revisions or amendments) and the adopted policies of the comprehensive plan. Over-sizing: Section 18.810.090.0 states that proposed sewer systems shall include consideration of additional development within the area as projected by the Comprehensive Plan. Sanitary sewer service is available on site and the proposed structure will be served by the existing sewer line. The load on the sewer line from the proposed use will be less than the previous use. There is no requirement for any off-site sewer work. Storm Drainage: General Provisions: Section 18.810.100.A requires developers to make adequate provisions for storm water and flood water runoff. Accommodation of Upstream Drainage: Section 18.810.100.0 states that a culvert or other drainage facility shall be large enough to accommodate potential runoff from its entire upstream drainage area, whether inside or outside the development. The City Engineer shall approve the necessary size of the facility, based on the provisions of Design and Construction Standards for Sanitary and Surface Water Management (as adopted by Clean Water Services in 2000 and including any future revisions or amendments). The applicant proposes to construct facilities that address detention and water quality requirements for the development proposed. The water quality and detention measures, as described in the narrative and shown in the plans and calculations are satisfactory. Because Highway 99W is an ODOT facility, the applicant is required to obtain ODOT and Clean Water Services approvals and permits for the water quality and detention facilities. Permits from Clean Water Services shall be submitted to the City for review and transmittal to CWS. Effect on Downstream Drainage: Section 18.810.100.D states that where it is anticipated by the City Engineer that the additional runoff resulting from the development will overload an existing drainage facility, the Director and Engineer shall withhold approval of the development until provisions have been made for improvement of the potential condition or until provisions have been made for storage of additional runoff caused by the development in accordance with the Design and Construction Standards for Sanitary and Surface Water Management (as adopted by Clean Water Services in 2000 and including any future revisions or amendments). In 1997, Clean Water Services (CWS) completed a basin study of Fanno Creek and adopted the Fanno Creek Watershed Management Plan. Section V of that plan includes a recommendation that local governments institute ENGINEERING COMMENTS SDR2009-00007 Autozone PAGE 6 a stormwater detention/effective impervious area reduction program resulting in no net increase in storm peak flows up to the 25-year event. The City will require that all new developments resulting in an increase of impervious surfaces provide onsite detention facilities, unless the development is located adjacent to Fanno Creek. For those developments adjacent to Fanno Creek, the storm water runoff will be permitted to discharge without detention. Detention is required and included on this project. Bikeways and Pedestrian Pathways: Bikeway Extension: Section 18.810.110.A states that developments adjoining proposed bikeways identified on the City's adopted pedestrian/bikeway plan shall include provisions for the future extension of such bikeways through the dedication of easements or right-of-way. No bikeways, bike lanes, or pedestrian pathways are required as part of this project. There is a pedestrian connection from the building to the sidewalk along the frontage. There is no other requirement for the project. Utilities: Section 18.810.120 states that all utility lines, but not limited to those required for electric, communication, lighting and cable television services and related facilities shall be placed underground, except for surface mounted transformers, surface mounted connection boxes and meter cabinets which may be placed above ground, temporary utility service facilities during construction, high capacity electric lines operating at 50,000 volts or above, and: • The developer shall make all necessary arrangements with the serving utility to provide the underground services; • The City reserves the right to approve location of all surface mounted facilities; • All underground utilities, including sanitary sewers and storm drains installed in streets by the developer, shall be constructed prior to the surfacing of the streets; and • Stubs for service connections shall be long enough to avoid disturbing the street improvements when service connections are made. Exception to Under-Grounding Requirement: Section 18.810.120.0 states that a developer shall pay a fee in-lieu of under-grounding costs when the development is proposed to take place on a street where existing utilities which are not underground will serve the development and the approval authority determines that the cost and technical difficulty of under- grounding the utilities outweighs the benefit of under-grounding in ENGINEERING COMMENTS SDR2009-00007 Autozone PAGE 7 conjunction with the development. The determination shall be on a case- by-case basis. The most common, but not the only, such situation is a short frontage development for which under-grounding would result in the placement of additional poles, rather than the removal of above-ground utilities facilities. An applicant for a development which is served by utilities which are not underground and which are located across a public right-of-way from the applicant's property shall pay a fee in-lieu of under- grounding. There are existing overhead utility lines along the frontage of Highway 99W. However, overhead power is high voltage at this location and undergrounding is not required. ADDITIONAL CITY AND/OR AGENCY CONCERNS WITH STREET AND UTILITY IMPROVEMENT STANDARDS: Traffic Study Findings: Traffic generated from the proposed use will be significantly less than that of the previous use. There is no need for a specific traffic study for the proposed project. Fire and Life Safety: Tualatin Valley Fire and Rescue (TVF&R) is the service provider for fire and emergency services. Comments from TVF&R,if any,need to be incorporated into the project. Public Water System: The City of Tigard is the service provider for water in this area.The proposed facility will obtain water service from the existing 2-inch service line located in the frontage of the property. Storm Water Quality: The City has agreed to enforce Surface Water Management (SWM) regulations established by Clean Water Services (CWS) Design and Construction Standards (adopted by Resolution and Order No. 00-7) which require the construction of on-site water quality facilities. The facilities shall be designed to remove 65 percent of the phosphorus contained in 100 percent of the storm water runoff generated from newly created impervious surfaces. In addition, a maintenance plan shall be submitted indicating the frequency and method to be used in keeping the facility maintained through the year. (For Private Facilities) To ensure compliance with Clean Water Services design and construction standards, the applicant shall employ the design engineer responsible for the design and specifications of the private water quality facility to perform ENGINEERING COMMENTS SDR2009-00007 Autozone PAGE 8 construction and visual observation of the water quality facility for compliance with the design and specifications. These inspections shall be made at significant stages throughout the project and at completion of the construction. Prior to final building inspection, the design engineer shall provide the City of Tigard (Inspection Supervisor) with written confirmation that the water quality facility is in compliance with the design and specifications. (For privately maintained Stormwater Management Units) This project is required to provide on-site detention and water quality treatment. The project plans includes facilities to address both. Calculations have been submitted to support the facilities incorporated in the project plans. With the construction of these facilities, these requirements are met. A water quality facility maintenance plan is required as part of the submittal for a Public Facility Improvement permit. After completion of the water quality facility, the applicant shall enter into an agreement with the City for future maintenance of the facility. This agreement will be recorded and the City will be monitoring the facility periodically to ensure compliance with the terms of the agreement. Grading and Erosion Control: CWS Design and Construction Standards also regulate erosion control to reduce the amount of sediment and other pollutants reaching the public storm and surface water system resulting from development, construction, grading, excavating, clearing, and any other activity which accelerates erosion. Per CWS regulations, the applicant is required to submit an erosion control plan for City review and approval prior to issuance of City permits. The Federal Clean Water Act requires that a National Pollutant Discharge Elimination System (NPDES) erosion control permit be issued for any development that will disturb one or more acre of land. Since this site is over five acres, the developer will be required to obtain an NPDES permit from the City prior to construction. This permit will be issued along with the site and/or building permit. (Grading plan for subdivisions) A final grading plan shall be submitted showing the existing and proposed contours. The plan shall detail the provisions for surface drainage of all lots, and show that they will be graded to insure that surface drainage is directed to the street or a public storm drainage system approved by the Engineering Department. For situations where the back portions of lots drain away from a street and toward adjacent lots, appropriate private storm drainage lines shall be provided to sufficiently contain and convey runoff from each lot. ENGINEERING COMMENTS SDR2009-00007 Autozone PAGE 9 The applicant will also be required to provide a geotechnical report, per Appendix Chapter 33 of the UBC, for the proposed grading slope construction. The recommendations of the report will need to be incorporated into the final grading plan and a final construction supervision report must be filed with the Engineering Department prior to issuance of building permits. The design engineer shall also indicate, on the grading plan, which lots will have natural slopes between 10% and 20%, as well as lots that will have natural slopes in excess of 20%. This information will be necessary in determining if special grading inspections and/or permits will be necessary when the lots develop. An erosion control plan is required as part of the project submittals prior to issuance of any City permits on the project. This includes submittal of an erosion control plan for demolition of the existing building,unless it is incorporated as part of an erosion control plan for the entire project. Site Permit Required: The applicant is required to obtain a Site Permit from the Building Division to cover all on- site private utility installations (water, sewer, storm, etc.). Address Assignments: The City of Tigard is responsible for assigning addresses for parcels within the City of Tigard. An addressing fee in the amount of $50.00 per address shall be assessed. This fee shall be paid to the City prior to site permit. The proposed development will be issued a new address after the existing structure is demolished and land use approval is granted for the new development.The addressing fee will be paid at that time. Recommendations: THE FOLLOWING CONDITIONS SHALL BE SATISFIED PRIOR TO ISSUANCE OF THE SITE PERMIT: Submit to the Community Development Department (Gus Duenas, 639-4171, ext. 2470) for review and approval: Prior to issuance of a site permit,a Public Facility Improvement (PFI) permit is typically required to cover half-street improvements, sanitary sewer, easement restoration and any other work in the public right-of-way or easement. The PFI also includes any work for on- site detention and on-site water quality treatment. ENGINEERING COMMENTS SDR2009-00007 Autozone PAGE 10 This project does include public facility improvements on an ODOT facility,and on-site detention and water quality treatment as required by Clean Water Services Design and Construction Standards (Resolution and Order No. 07-20). All work proposed for those improvements shall be reviewed and permitted by ODOT. Final plans and calculations for both facilities shall be submitted as part of the PFI application to the Development Engineer (Gus Duenas) for review and approval prior to issuance of the PFI. The water quality and detention facilities are private but will be inspected by the City for conformance to detention and water quality requirements. In addition,a proposed maintenance plan for these facilities shall be submitted along with the plans and calculations for review and approval. Six (6) sets of detailed plans covering those two improvements shall be submitted for review to the Development Engineer. NOTE: these plans are in addition to any drawings required by the Building Division and should only include sheets relevant to storm drainage,water quality and detention. PFI permit plans shall conform to City of Tigard Public Improvement Design Standards,which are available at City Hall and the City's web page (www.tigard-or.gov). An erosion control plan shall be provided as part of the PFI permit drawings. The plan shall conform to Clean Water Services Design and Construction Standards (Resolution and Order No. 07-20) Chapter 2. No work on-site shall commence until the erosion control permits are issued. The PFI permit plan submittal shall include the exact legal name,address and telephone number of the individual or corporate entity who will be designated as the"Permittee", and who will provide the financial assurance for the public improvements. For example, specify if the entity is a corporation, limited partnership, LLC, etc. Also specify the state within which the entity is incorporated and provide the name of the corporate contact person. Failure to provide accurate information to the Development Engineer will delay processing of project documents. Prior to issuance of the PFI permit, the applicant shall obtain ODOT approvals and permits needed for construction of the sidewalk, planter strip, water quality and detention facilities. The applicant shall provide a construction vehicle access and parking plan for approval by the City Engineer. The purpose of this plan is for parking and traffic control during the construction phase. The City Engineer may determine the necessity for,and require submittal and approval of, a construction access and parking plan for the building phase. If the City Engineer deems such a plan necessary, the applicant shall provide the plan prior to issuance of building permits. The applicant shall obtain approval from the City of Tigard Water Division for the proposed water connection prior to issuance of the City's PFI permit. ENGINEERING COMMENTS SDR2009-00007 Autozone PAGE 11 Prior to issuance of the site permit, the applicant shall obtain concurrence from TVF&R that no fire protection system is required and that the existing hydrant location is satisfactory for fire protection of the structure. Prior to issuance of the site permit, the applicant shall submit an address application to the City. The fee must be paid by the applicant prior to issuance of the site permit (STAFF CONTACT: Bethany Stewart,Public Works Engineering). THE FOLLOWING CONDITIONS SHALL BE SATISFIED PRIOR TO ISSUANCE OF BUILDING PERMITS: Submit to the Development Engineer (Gus Duenas, 639-4171, ext. 2470) for review and approval: onc THE FOLLOWING CONDITIONS SHALL BE SATISFIED PRIOR TO A FINAL BUILDING INSPECTION: Submit to the Development Engineer (Gus Duenas, 639-4171, ext. 2470) for review and approval: Prior to a final building inspection, the applicant shall complete detention and water quality facilities. The applicant's engineer shall submit documentation to the Development Engineer certifying that the water quality treatment facilities are constructed in accordance with CWS standards. Prior to final building inspection, the applicant shall enter into an agreement with the City on City-furnished forms for maintenance of the private water quality on-site. That agreement will be recorded and the City will be periodically monitoring the facility for compliance with the terms of the maintenance agreement. Prior to a final building inspection, the applicant shall provide the City with as-built drawings of the detention and water quality facilities as follows: 1) 3 mil mylar,2) a disk of the as-builts in "DWG" format, if available; otherwise "DXF" will be acceptable, and 3) the as-built drawings shall be tied to the City's GPS network. The applicant's engineer shall provide the City with an electronic file with points for each structure (manholes, catch basins, water valves, hydrants and other water system features) in the development, and their respective X and Y State Plane Coordinates, referenced to NAD 83 (91). Prior to a final building inspection the applicant's engineer shall submit a final sight distance certification for the driveway connections to Highway 99W. ENGINEERING COMMENTS SDR2009-00007 Autozone PAGE 12 ENGINEERING COMMENTS SDR2009-00007 Autozone PAGE 13 City of Tigard TIGARD Memorandum To: Hap Watkins From: Todd Prager Re: Autozone Date: April 6, 2010 As you requested I have provided comments on the "Autozone" project. If you have any questions or concerns regarding my comments please contact me anytime. 18.360.090 Approval Criteria A. Approval criteria. The Director shall make a finding with respect to each of the following criteria when approving, approving with conditions, or denying an application: 2 Relationship to the natural and physical environment: a. Buildings shall be: (1) Located to preserve existing trees, topography and natural drainage where possible based upon existing site conditions; Only one existing tree will be removed as a result of this project. Therefore, this criteria has been met. 18.745.030 General Provisions C. Installation Requirements. The installation of all landscaping shall be as follows: 1. All landscaping shall be installed according to accepted planting procedures. The accepted planting procedures are the guidelines described in the Tigard Tree Manual. These guidelines follow those set forth by the International Society of Arboriculture (ISA) tree planting guidelines as well as the standards set forth in the most recent edition of the American Institute of Architects' Architectural Graphic Standards. In the Architectural Graphic Standards there are guidelines for selecting and planting trees based on the soil volume and size at maturity. Additionally, there are directions for soil amendments and modifications. 2 The plant material shall be of high grade, and shall meet the size and grading standards of the American Standards for Nurberg Stock(ANSI Z-60, 1-1986, and any other future revisions);and 3. Landscaping shall be installed in accordance with the provisions of this tide. D. Certificate of Occupancy. Certificates of occupancy shall not be issued unless the landscaping requirements have been met or other arrangements have been made and approved by the City such as the posting of a bond. 18.745.040, Street Trees B. Street tree planting list. Certain trees can severely damage utilities, streets and sidewalks or can cause personal injury. Approval of any planting list shall be subject to review by the Director. The applicant is proposing to plant eight medium stature street trees placed no greater than 30' on center (except where there are conflicts with the bus shelter). Therefore, this criterion has been met. 18.745.050, Buffering and Screening A. General provisions. 3. In lieu of these standards, a detailed buffer area landscaping and screening plan may be submitted for the Director's approval as an alternative to the buffer area landscaping and screening standards,provided it affords the same degree of buffering and screening as required by this code. B. Buffering and screening requirements. 1. A buffer consists of an area within a required setback adjacent to a property line and having a depth equal to the amount specified in the buffering and screening matrix and containing a length equal to the length of the property line of the abutting use or uses; 2. A buffer area may only be occupied by utilities, screening, sidewalks and bikeways, and landscaping. No buildings, accessways or parking areas shall be allowed in a buffer area except where an accessway has been approved by the City; 3. A fence, hedge or wall, or any combination of such elements, which are located in any yard is subject to the conditions and requirements of Sections 18.745.050.B.8 and 18.745.050.D; 4. The minimum improvements within a buffer area shall consist of combinations for landscaping and screening as specified in Table 18.745.1. In addition, improvements shall meet the following specifications: a. At least one row of trees shall be planted. They shall have a minimum caliper of two inches at four feet in height above grade for deciduous trees and a minimum height of five feet high for evergreen trees at the time of planting. Spacing for trees shall be as follows: (1) Small or narrow-stature trees, under 25 feet tall or less than 16 feet wide at maturity shall be spaced no further than 15 feet apart; (2) Medium-sized trees between 25 feet to 40 feet tall and with 16 feet to 35 feet wide branching at maturity shall be spaced no greater than 30 feet apart; (3) Large trees, over 40 feet tall and with more than 35 feet wide branching at maturity, shall be spaced no greater than 30 feet apart. This criterion does not appear to be applicable to this project. E. Screening:special provisions. 1. Screening and landscaping ofparking and loading areas: a. Screening ofparking and loading areas is required. The specifications for this screening are as follows: (1) Landscaped parking areas shall include special design features which effectively screen the parking lot areas from view. These design features may include the use of landscaped berms, decorative walls and raised planters; (2) Landscape planters may be used to define or screen the appearance of off- street parking areas from the public right-of-way; (3) Materials to be installed should achieve a balance between low lying and vertical shrubbery and trees; (4) Trees shall be planted in landscaped islands in all parking areas, and shall be equally distributed and on the basis of one tree for each seven parking spaces in order to provide a canopy effect;and (5) The minimum dimension of the landscape islands shall be three feet and the landscaping shall be protected from vehicular damage by some form of wheel guard or curb. This criteria has been met by the planting of large canopy trees in the parking lot with sufficient soil volume to support their growth to maturity. 18.790.030, Tree Plan Requirement A. Tree plan required. A tree plan for the planting, removal and protection of trees prepared by a certified arborist shall be provided for any lot,parcel or combination of lots or parcels for which a development application for a subdivision, partition, site development review,planned development or conditional use is filed. Protection is preferred over removal wherever possible. A tree plan has been provided by the applicant, and contains all of the required elements. B. Plan requirements. The tree plan shall include the following: 1. Identification of the location, size and species of all existing trees including trees designated as significant by the city; This requirement has been met in the arborist report dated 12/11/2009. 2. Identification of a program to save existing trees or mitigate tree removal over 12 inches in caliper. Mitigation must follow the replacement guidelines of Section 18.790.060D, in accordance with the following standards and shall be exclusive of trees required by other development code provisions for landscaping, streets and parking lots: a. Retention of less than 25% of existing trees over 12 inches in caliper requires a mitigation program in accordance with Section 18.790.060D of no net loss of trees; b. Retention of from 25% to 50% of existing trees over 12 inches in caliper requires that two-thirds of the trees to be removed be mitigated in accordance with Section 18.790.060D; c. Retention of from 50% to 75% of existing trees over 12 inches in caliper requires that 50 percent of the trees to be removed be mitigated in accordance with Section 18.790.060D; d. Retention of 75% or greater of existing trees over 12 inches in caliper requires no mitigation. This requirement has been met. Based on the arborist report 2 of 3 trees over 12 inches diameter are to be preserved for a retention percentage of 66%. According to the requirements above, 50% of the total inches removed require mitigation. The applicant is proposing to mitigate with 9 caliper inches of trees not required by other code provisions. The applicant is required to deposit a cash assurance of$1,125 (9 caliper inches x $125/caliper inch mitigation fee) to ensure two years survival of the mitigation trees. 3. Identification of all trees which are proposed to be removed; This requirement has been met in the arborist report dated 12/11/2009. 4. A protection program defining standards and methods that will be used by the applicant to protect trees during and after construction. This requirement has been met in the arborist report dated 12/11/2009. Conditions of approval will ensure that the tree protection program is implemented during and after construction. B. Subsequent removal of a tree. Any tree preserved or retained in accordance with this section may thereafter be removed only for the reasons set out in a tree plan, in accordance with Section 18.790.030, or as a condition of approval for a conditional use, and shall not be subject to removal under any other section of this chapter. The property owner shall record a deed restriction as a condition of approval of any development permit affected by this section to the effect that such tree may be removed only if the tree dies or is hazardous according to a certified arborist. The deed restriction may be removed or will be considered invalid if a tree preserved in accordance with this section should either die or be removed as a hazardous tree. The form of this deed restriction shall be subject to approval by the Director. A condition of approval will ensure this requirement is met. CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL Tree Protection Plan The applicant shall position fencing as directed by the project arborist and detailed on tree preservation sheet L1.0. The applicant shall allow access by the City Arborist for the purpose of monitoring and inspection of the tree protection to verify that the tree protection measures are performing adequately. Failure to follow the plan, or maintain tree protection fencing in the designated locations shall be grounds for immediate suspension of work on the site until remediation measures and/or civil citations can be processed. If work is required within an established tree protection zone, the project arborist shall prepare a proposal detailing the construction techniques to be employed and the likely impacts to the trees. The proposal shall be reviewed and approved by the City Arborist before proposed work can proceed within a tree protection zone. The City Arborist may require changes prior to approval. The project arborist shall be on site while work is occurring within the tree protection zone and submit a summary report certifying that the work occurred per the proposal and will not significantly impact the health and/or stability of the trees. This note shall be included on the Tree Protection Plan. The applicant shall have an on-going responsibility to ensure that the Project Arborist has submitted written reports to the City Arborist, at least once every two weeks, as the Project Arborist monitors the construction activities from initial tree protection zone (TPZ) fencing installation through the building construction phases. The reports shall evaluate the condition and location of the tree protection fencing, determine if any changes occurred to the TPZ, and if any part of the Tree Protection Plan has been violated. If the amount of TPZ was reduced, then the Project Arborist shall certify that the construction activities did not adversely impact the overall, long-term health and stability of the tree(s). If the reports are not submitted to the City Arborist at the scheduled intervals, and if it appears the TPZ's or the Tree Protection Plan are not being followed by the contractor or a sub-contractor, the City can stop work on the project until an inspection can be done by the City Arborist and the Project Arborist. Prior to final inspection, the applicant shall submit a final report by the Project Arborist certifying the health of protected trees and that the street trees were properly planted per the approved street tree plan. Tree protection measures may be removed and final inspection authorized upon review and approval by the City Arborist. Deed Restriction Prior to issuance of any Certificates of Occupancy, the applicant/owner shall record deed restrictions to the effect that any existing tree greater than 6" diameter may be removed only if the tree dies or is hazardous according to a certified arborist. The deed restriction may be removed or will be considered invalid if all trees preserved in accordance with this decision should either die or be removed as hazardous trees. Tree Mitigation Based on the arborist report 2 of 3 trees over 12 inches diameter are to be preserved for a retention percentage of 66%. According to the requirements above, 50% of the total inches removed require mitigation. The applicant is proposing to mitigate with 9 caliper inches of trees not required by other code provisions. The applicant is required to deposit a cash assurance of$1,125 (9 caliper inches x $125/caliper inch mitigation fee) to ensure two years survival of the mitigation trees. inch mitigation fee) provided that the arborist signs off on the proposed mitigation plan. Prior to site work, the applicant shall submit a cash assurance (letter of credit or cash deposit) for the equivalent value of mitigation required (e.g. 9 caliper inches of proposed mitigation tree planting x $125/caliper inch). Any trees successfully planted on or off-site,in accordance with an approved Tree Mitigation Plan and TDC 18.790.060.D,will be credited against the assurance two years after all of the trees are planted. After the plan is approved and the trees are planted, the project arborist shall submit a letter to the City Arborist to certify that all of the mitigation trees were properly planted per the approved Tree Mitigation Plan in order to set the starting point of the two year tree establishment period. After the two year establishment period, the applicant shall provide a re-inventory of the mitigation trees conducted by a certified arborist in order to document mitigation tree survival, and compliance with the approved Tree Mitigation Plan. The remaining value of caliper inches not successfully mitigated shall be paid as a fee in-lieu of planting from the original cash assurance. Failure to plant and provide documentation of mitigation tree planting by the project arborist within 6 months of certificate of occupancy issuance shall result in the forfeiture of the cash assurance to the City's tree fund. • Hap Watkins From: Baldwin, Ben [BaldwinB©trimet.org] Sent: Tuesday, March 30, 2010 3:40 PM To: Hap Watkins Subject: AutoZone on Pacific highway bus stop Attachments: 1325_001.pdf Hello Hap: Attached is a sketch of what would best serve TriMet's needs at the bus stop (loc. ID#4254) located adjacent to the proposed AutoZone store. I would like to add a 10' long concrete pad to serve the front door of the bus and use the pad already shown in the plans to serve the rear door of the bus. Both pads can be designed to City of Tigard sidewalk standards (200psi,4" minimum depth etc.) and can accommodate a cross slope of 0-2%. As shown,the new bus stop will be located about 55' east of the crosswalk and 77' west of its current location. The 30' long bus stop area should be free of trees to improve the line of sight between bus operators and waiting patrons, but trees can be placed immediately east and west of the designated stop area. Please let me know if the pad already shown in the plans serves another purpose that conflicts with the bus stop placement. Sincerely, Ben Baldwin Project Planner TM Transit Development 503-962-2140 ,."i'' V • \ I 1 k 18.5' ' 1 1 6' .e.'.- , / bl SNV k,- atimmouaIIIIIIIININAIMIIhmiuni 1 i _.J.. ......... 040 ,t* 00, , ..- ..., ., . , 0000_ — vim 10-0 mow mow wimplopp-or . . ...... ,5.3,„44 .., 4:.101. LUMINAIRE ........ 1 cr) :,,;.1:',`:.,',5,ii'',-;•.1..5 :' \,,_■________.-_.--" (TYP) (\I PROPOSED WALL - or W/3'SCREEN NN, 1 * —4.1.-- PROPOSED 10' up " i 4 ff PROPOSED SIDEWALK RNV DEDICATION it ...... -_, li ---,i s- I A10111 02, Ii ....., ....... .-...■■■] 1 I 1 . I li inlb t Sn°1;1 I 7"W 24G i ID' li z0.c! 1420p0s c r> b PROPOSED RETAINING / ----"I L loP Waif/e.,t.) .,-- WALL(TYP) 1 11 :.8 . . i V - -- ■ Ttf--- • 6e 2.. C,.AJc&viesi.`i \ b 1- WAY 0 u.j BUS STOP ce ° , . t I iN 0 CI*" SIGN I i t L11 lit -f t LIJ 6 r • 0 ■ 1 . U) .-1 Ft-oii ocrce- Racial; Corni2----' i . 0< I a' W i t- IX SW PACIFIC HIGHWAY 1 I 1 1 OA 1. 1 I 1 I'. (PUBLIC--ASPHALT) , ‘ , . , , • • -4,.. , I I 1 • 1 1 1 I, I I 1 I 1 I ....--- •••-•ir.••••••• ,... • • t I '' '----- ------ -------- , .., ..-------- , • ...•..•---• .,_ _ 4 -.• 71 • : --------PT-----'tf°1ACity of Tigard TIGARD REQUEST FOR COMMEN DATE: March 12,2010 RECEIVED PLANNING TO: Mike Hieb,Portland General Electric MAR 2 4 2010 FROM: City of Tigard Planning Division STAFF CONTACT: Hap Watkins,Assistant Planner CITY OF TIGARD Phone: (503) 718-2440 Fax: (503) 718-2748 Email: hapna,tigard-or.gov SITE DEVELOPMENT REVIEW (SDR) 2009-00007 - AUTOZONE RETAIL STORE - REQUEST: The applicant is proposing to demolish an existing building and construct a 6,800 square foot auto-related retail business on a .84-acre parcel. Site improvements will include a new building, 32 parking spaces and associated landscaping. A new sidewalk will be constructed along the front of the lot. Access ways will not be affected. LOCATION: 13405 SW Pacific Highway;Washington County Tax Map 2S102CB,Tax Lot 01802. ZONE: C-G: General Commercial District. The C-G zoning district is designed to accommodate a full range of retail, office and civic uses with a City-wide and even regional trade area. Except where nonconforming, residential uses are limited to single- family residences which are located on the same site as a permitted use. A wide range of uses, including but not limited to adult entertainment, automotive equipment repair and storage, mini-warehouses, utilities, heliports, medical centers, major event entertainment, and gasoline stations, are permitted conditionally. APPLICABLE REVIEW CRITERIA: Community Development Code Chapters 18.360, 18.390, 18.520, 18.705, 18.745, 18.755, 18.765, 18.795 and 18.810. The Proposed Amendments are attached for your review. From information supplied by various departments and agencies and from other information available to our staff, a report and recommendation will be prepared and a decision will be rendered on the proposal in the near future. If you wish to comment on this application, WE NEED YOUR COMMENTS BACK BY: Friday March 26, 2010. You may use the space provided below or attach a separate letter to return your comments. If you are unable to respond by the above date, please phone the staff contact noted above with your comments and confirm your comments in writing as soon as possible. If you have any questions, contact the Tigard Planning Division, 13125 SW Hall Boulevard,Tigard, OR 97223. PLEASE CHECK THE FOLLOWING ITEMS THAT APPLY: We have reviewed the proposal and have no objections to it. Please contact of our office. — Please refer to the enclosed letter or email. Written comments provided below: 4( f ease (I/YL -ci PCr6 out (503) 73(49 - 5zf5-0 berrYe done. /;'44Pvt. 1 de.44€, -/-7.e. ailot rem -A edit-ties. Lima.. fa1rrlSh -pot, Amor- (5i3)57a- LAM Name&Number of Person Cot�Mienting: r • CleanWater Services Our conunifmcnt i, cle��r. RECEIVED PLANNING MAR 2 4 2010 . MEMORANDUM CITY OF TIGARD Date: March 22, 2010 To: Hap Watkins, Assistant Planner, City of Tigard From: Jackie Sue Humphrey, Clean Water Services (the District) Subject: Autozone Retail Store, SDR 2009-00007, 2S102CB01802 Please include the following comments when writing your conditions of approval: PRIOR TO ANY WORK ON THE SITE A Clean Water Services (the District) Storm Water Connection Permit Authorization must be obtained. Application for the District's Permit Authorization must be in accordance with the requirements of the Design and Construction Standards, Resolution and Order No. 07-20, (or current R&O in effect at time of Engineering plan submittal), and is to include: a. Detailed plans prepared in accordance with Chapter 2, Section 2.04.2.b-l. b. Detailed grading and erosion control plan. An Erosion Control Permit will be required. Area of Disturbance must be clearly identified on submitted construction plans. If site area and any offsite improvements required for this development exceed one-acre of disturbance, project will require a 1200-C Erosion Control Permit. c. Detailed plans showing the development having direct access by gravity to public storm and sanitary sewer. d. Provisions for water quality in accordance with the requirements of the above named design standards. Water Quality is required for all new development and redevelopment areas per R&O 07-20, Section 4.05.5, Table 4-1. Access shall be provided for maintenance of facility per R&O 07-20, Section 4.02.4. e. If use of an existing, offsite or regional Water Quality Facility is proposed, it must be clearly identified on plans, showing its location, condition, capacity to treat this site and, any additional improvements and/or upgrades that may be needed to utilize that facility. 2550 SW Hillsboro Highway• Hillsboro, Oregon 97123 Phone: (503) 681-3600• Fax: (503)681-3603 •www.CleanWaterServices.org f. If private lot LIDA systems proposed, must comply with the current CWS Design and Construction Standards. A private maintenance agreement, for the proposed private lot LIDA systems, needs to be provided to the City for review and acceptance. g. Show all existing and proposed easements on plans. Any required storm sewer, sanitary sewer, and water quality related easements must be granted to the City. h. Any proposed offsite construction activities will require an update or amendment to the current Service Provider Letter for this project. CONCLUSION This Land Use Review does not constitute the District's approval of storm or sanitary sewer compliance to the NPDES permit held by the District. The District,prior to issuance of any connection permits, must approve final construction plans and drainage calculations. 03/15/2010 14:28 FAX 503 273 4822 NW NATURAL ENG 8001 City of Tigard T I G ARL) REQUEST FOR COMMENTS DATE: March 12.2010 TO: Scott Palmer.NW Natural Gas Engineering Coordinatnr FROM: City of Tigard Planning Division STAFF CONTACT: Hap Watkins_Assistant Planner Phone: (503) 718-2440 Fax: (503)718-2748 Email:hap(aitigard-or.gov SITE DEVELOPMENT REVIEW(SDR)2009-00007 - AUTOZONE RETAIL STORE - REQUEST: The applicant is proposing to demolish an existing building and construct a 6,800 square foot auto-related retail business on a -84-acre parcel_ Site improvements will include a new building, 32 parking spaces and associated landscaping. A new sidewalk will be constructed along the front of the lot- Access ways will not be affected. LOCATION: 13405 SW Pacific Highway;Washington County Tax Map 2S102CB,Tax Lot 01802- ZONE: C-G: General Commercial District. The C-G zoning district is designed to accommodate a full range of retail, office and civic uses with a City-wide and even regional trade area. Except where nonconforming, residential uses are limited to single- family residences which are located on the same site as a permitted use. A wide range of uses, including but not limited CO adult entertainment, automotive equipment repair and storage, mini-warehouses, utilities, heliports, medical centers, major event entertainment, and gasoline stations, are permitted conditionally. APPLICABLE REVIEW CRITERIA Community Development Code Chapters 18.360, 18.390, 18.520,18.705, 18.745, 18.755, 18.765, 18.795 and 18.810. The Proposed Amendments are attached for your review. From information supplied by various departments and agencies and from other information available to our staff,a report and recommendation will be prepared and a decision will be rendered on the proposal in the near future. If you wish to comment on this application, WE NEED YOUR COMMENTS BACK BY: Friday March 26,2010. You may use the space providedbelow or attach a separate letter to return your comments. If ,ou are unable to respond by the above date, please phone the staff contact noted above with your comments and con. mu your comments in writing as soon as possible. If you have any questions, contact the Tigard Planning Division, 13125 SW Hall Boulevard,Tigard, OR 97223. KEW.CHECK THE FOLLOWING ITEMS-THAT APPLY: We have reviewed the proposal and have no objections to it. Please contact - _ of our office. Please refer to the enclosed letter or email. _ Written comments provided below: Lame&Number of Person Commenting: ie./07,640 /��s ,�// ,�4 y,.�� P7`2 26-40// / /° �s•7 X 43x!' • City of Tigard TIGARD REQUEST FOR COMMENTS DATE: March 12,2010 TO: PER ATTACHED FROM: City of Tigard Planning Division STAFF CONTACT: Hap Watkins,Assistant Planner Phone: (503) 718-2440 Fax: (503) 718-2748 Email: hap(a,tigard-or.gov SITE DEVELOPMENT REVIEW (SDR) 2009-00007 - AUTOZONE RETAIL STORE - REQUEST: The applicant is proposing to demolish an existing building and construct a 6,800 square foot auto-related retail business on a .84-acre parceL Site improvements will include a new building, 32 parking spaces and associated landscaping. A new sidewalk will be constructed along the front of the lot. Access ways will not be affected. LOCATION: 13405 SW Pacific Highway;Washington County Tax Map 2S102CB,Tax Lot 01802. ZONE: C-G: General Commercial District. The C-G zoning district is designed to accommodate a full range of retail, office and civic uses with a City-wide and even regional trade area. Except where nonconforming, residential uses are limited to single- family residences which are located on the same site as a permitted use. A wide range of uses,including but not limited to adult entertainment, automotive equipment repair and storage, mini-warehouses, utilities, heliports, medical centers, major event entertainment, and gasoline stations, are permitted conditionally. APPLICABLE REVIEW CRITERIA: Community Development Code Chapters 18.360, 18.390, 18.520, 18.705, 18.745, 18.755, 18.765, 18.795 and 18.810. The Proposed Amendments are attached for your review. From information supplied by various departments and agencies and from other information available to our staff, a report and recommendation will be prepared and a decision will be rendered on the proposal in the near future. If you wish to comment on this application, WE NEED YOUR COMMENTS BACK BY: Friday March 26, 2010. You may use the space provided below or attach a separate letter to return your comments. If you are unable to respond by the above date, please phone the staff contact noted above with your comments and confirm your comments in writing as soon as possible. If you have any questions, contact the Tigard Planning Division, 13125 SW Hall Boulevard,Tigard,OR 97223. FP-LEASE CHECK THE FOLLOWING ITEMS THAT APPLY: We have reviewed the proposal and have no objections to it. Please contact of our office. _ Please refer to the enclosed letter or email. Written comments provided below: Name&Number of Person Commenting CITY OF TIGARD REQUEST FOP COMMENTS NOTIFICi N LIST FOR LAND USE & COMMUNITY I _OPMENT APPLICATIONS FILE NOS.: SD12 07 FILE NAME: 41,APDZ/1/VC- CITY OFFICES _C.D.ADMINISTRATION/Ron Bunch,CD Director X DEVELOPMENT SERVICES/Gus Duenas,Development Engineer _PUBLIC WORKS/Brian Rager,Assistant PW Director _C.D.ADMINISTRATION/Susan Hartnett,Asst.CD Director _DEVELOPMENT SERVICES/Todd Prager,Assoc.Planner/Arborist _PUBLIC WORKS/Steve Martin,Parks Manager _CITY ADMINISTRATION/Cathy Wheatley,City Recorder XC BUILDING DIVISION/Mark Vandomelen,Building Official _PUBLIC WORKS/Ted Kyle,City Engineer _DEVELOPMENT SERVICES/Planning-Engineering Techs. _POLICE DEPARTMENT/Jim Wolf,Crime Prevention Officer _HEARINGS OFFICER(+2 sets) _LONG RANGE PLANNING/Christine Darnell,Code Compliance Specialist(DCA) PLANNING COMMISSION(+12 sets) X FILE/REFERENCE(+2 sets) SPECIAL DISTRICTS _ TUAL.HILLS PARK&REC.DIST.*2(TUALATIN VALLEY FIRE&RESCUE* _ TUALATIN VALLEY WATER DISTRICT* A CLEAN WATER SERVICES* Planning Manager North Division Administrative Office Development Services Department 15707 SW Walker Road John K.Dalby,Deputy Fire Marshall 1850 SW 170'"Avenue David Schweitzer/SWM Program Z Beaverton,OR 97006 14480 SW Jenkins Road Beaverton,OR 97006 2550 SW Hillsboro Highway Beaverton,OR 97005-1152 Hillsboro,OR 97123 LOCAL AND STATE JURISDICTIONS CITY OF BEAVERTON * _ CITY OF TUALATIN * _OR.DEPT.OF FISH&WILDLIFE _OR.DIV.OF STATE LANDS Planning Manager Planning Manager Devin Simmons,Habitat Biologist Melinda Wood(wLUN Form Required) _ Steven Sparks,Dev.Svcs.Manager 18880 SW Martinazzi Avenue North Willamette Watershed District 775 Summer Street NE,Suite 100 PO Box 4755 Tualatin,OR 97062 18330 NW Sauvie Island Road Salem,OR 97301-1279 Beaverton,OR 97076 Portland,OR 97231 OR.PUB.UTILITIES COMM. METRO-LAND USE&PLANNING* _OR.DEPT.OF GEO.&MINERAL IND. 550 Capitol Street NE CITY OF DURHAM * 600 NE Grand Avenue 800 NE Oregon Street,Suite 5 Salem,OR 97310-1380 City Manager Portland,OR 97232-2736 Portland,OR 97232 17160 SW Upper Boones Fry.Rd. _ Joanna Mensher,Data Resource Center(ZCA) _US ARMY CORPS.OF ENG. Durham,OR 97224 _ Paulette Allen,Growth Management Coordinator _OR.DEPT.OF LAND CONSERV.&DVLP. Kathryn Harris(Maps a cws Letter Only) _ Mel Huie,Greenspaces Coordinator(CPA/Z0A) Mara Ulloa(Comp.Plan Amendments&Measure 37) Routing CENWP-OP-G _CITY OF KING CITY* _ Jennifer Budhabhatti,Regional Planner(Wetlands) 635 Capitol Street NE,Suite 150 PO Box 2946 City Manager _ C.D.Manager,Growth Management Services Salem,OR 97301-2540 Portland,OR 97208-2946 15300 SW 116th Avenue _ O.Gerald Uba,Ph.D.,Planning&Devlpmnt(CPNDCNZON) King City,OR 97224 WASHINGTON COUNTY _ OR.DEPT.OF ENERGY(Powedines in Area) _OR.DEPT OF AVIATION(Monopole Towers) Dept.of Land Use&Transp. Bonneville Power Administration Tom Highland,Planning 155 N.First Avenue CITY OF LAKE OSWEGO* Routing TTRC—Attn: Renae Ferrera 3040 25th Street,SE Suite 350,MS 13 Planning Director PO Box 3621 Salem,OR 97310 Hillsboro,OR 97124 PO Box 369 Portland,OR 97208-3621 _Naomi Vogel-Beattie(General Apps Lake Oswego,OR 97034 _Planning Division(ZCA)MS 14 _ OR.DEPT.OF ENVIRON.QUALITY(DEQ) ODOT,REGION 1 * _Brent Curtis(CPA) _CITY OF PORTLAND (Notify for Wetlands and Potential Environmental Impacts) _Development Review Coordinator _Doria Mateja(zcA)Ms 14 Planning Bureau Director Regional Administrator _Carl Torland, Right-of-Way Section(vacations) _Sr.Cartographer(CFNZCA)MS14 1900 SW 4th Avenue,Suite 4100 2020 SW Fourth Avenue,Suite 400 123 NW Flanders _Jim Nims,Surveyor(zcA)MS 1s Portland,OR 97201 Portland,OR 97201-4987 Portland,OR 97209-4037 _OR.PARKS&REC.DEPT. _WA.CO.CONSOL.COMM.AGNCY IAODOT,REGION 1 -DISTRICT 2A* _ODOT,RAIL DIVISION STATE HISTORIC Dave Austin(wcccA)"911"(MenepelTowers) Chad Gordon,Assistant District Manager (Notify if ODOT R/R-Hwy.Crossing is Only Access to Land) PRESERVATION OFFICE PO Box 6375 6000 SW Raab Road Dave Lanning,Si.Crossing Safety Specialist (Notify if Property Has HD Overlay) Beaverton,OR 97007-0375 Portland,OR 97221 555-13th Street,NE,Suite 3 725 Sumner Street NE,Suite C Salem,OR 97301-4179 Salem,OR 97301 UTILITY PROVIDERS AND SPECIAL AGENCIES _PORTLAND WESTERN R/R,BURLINGTON NORTHERN/SANTA FE R/R,OREGON ELECTRIC R/R(Burlington Northern/Santa Fe R/R Predecessor) Bruce Carswell,President&General Manager 1200 Howard Drive SE Albany,OR 97322-3336 _SOUTHERN PACIFIC TRANS.CO.R/R _METRO AREA COMMUNICATIONS _COMCAST CABLE CORP. X TRI-MET TRANSIT DVLPMT. Clifford C.Cabe,Construction Engineer Debra Palmer(Annexations orm Gerald Backhaus lsee Mapfo,oeacomacp (If Project is Within%Mile of a Transit Route) 5424 SE McLoughlin Boulevard Twin Oaks Technology Center 14200 SW Brigadoon Court Ben Baldwin,Project Plannerj - Portland,OR 97232 1815 NW 169th Place,S-6020 Beaverton,OR 97005 710 NE Holladay Street Beaverton,OR 97006-4886 Portland,OR 97232 _C PORTLAND GENERAL ELECTRIC 4e NW NATURAL GAS COMPANY x VERIZON _QWEST COMMUNICATIONS Mike Hieb Svc.Design Consultant Scott Palmer,Engineering Coord. John Cousineau,OSP Network Lynn Smith,Eng.ROW Mgr. 9480 SW Boeckman Road 220 NW Second Avenue 4155 SW Cedar Hills Blvd. 8021 SW Capitol Hill Rd,Rm 110 Wilsonville,OR 97070 Portland,OR 97209-3991 Beaverton,OR 97005 Portland,OR 97219 _TIGARD/TUALATIN SCHOOL DIST.#23J_BEAVERTON SCHOOL DIST.#48 ZC COMCAST CABLE CORP. _COMCAST CABLE COMMUNIC. Teri Brady,Administrative Offices Jennifer Garland,Demographics Alex Silantiev (s.eMap+or..conr.d) Brian Every(Apps E.or HaNN.or 99W) 6960 SW Sandburg Street 16550 SW Merlo Road 9605 SW Nimbus Avenue,Bldg. 12 10831 SW Cascade Avenue Tigard,OR 97223-8039 Beaverton,OR 97006-5152 Beaverton,OR 97008 Tigard,OR 97223-4203 * INDICATES AUTOMATIC NOTIFICATION IN COMPLIANCE WITH INTERGOVERNMENTAL AGREEMENT IF WITHIN 500'OF THE SUBJECT PROPERTY FOR ANY/ALL CITY PROJECTS (Project Planner Is Responsible For Indicating Parties To Notify). i:1CURPLN\Masters\Request For Comments Notification List.doc (UPDATED: 20-Jan-10) (Also update:is\curpin\setup\labelslannexations\annexation_utilities and franchises.doc,mailing labels&auto text when updating this documet 12 MAILING / NOTIFICATION RECORDS , AFFIDAVIT OF MAILING TIGARD I,Patricia L.Lunsford,being first dulysworn/affirm,on oath depose and say that I am a Planning Assistant for the City of Tigard,Washington County,Oregon and that I served the following: {O kA4p.r..&ox(:1&coal © NOTICE OF PENDING LAND USE DECISION FOR SDR2009-00007/AUTOZONE RETAIL STORE AMENDED NOTICE (File NolName Reference) ® City of Tigard Planning Director A copy of the said notice being hereto attached,marked Exhibit"A",and by reference made a part hereof,was mailed to each named person(s) at the address(s) shown on the attached list(s),marked Exhibit"B",and by reference made a part hereof,on March 12,2010,and deposjt,edn the U • : tes Mail on March 12,2010,postage prepaid. l itace- (Person t at Prepared Notice STATE OF OREGON County of Washington) ss. City of Tigard ) Subscribed and sworn/affirmed before me on the �1 day of P-11 ,2010. (1 +• OFFICIAL SEAL ( :"Zr- OTARY P C OF OREGON y SHIRLEY L TREAT r NOTARY PUBLIC-OREGON COMMISSION NO.410777 / My Commission Expires: 4-11gSIII / MY COMMISSION EXPIRES APRIL 25,2011 ; EXHIBIT. NOTICE TO MORTGAGEE,LIE NHOLDER,VENDOR OR SELLER: THE TIGARD DEVELOPMENT CODE REQUIRES THAT IF YOU RECEIVE THIS NOTICE,IT SHALL BE PROMPTLY FORWARDED TO THE PURCHASER NOTICE OF PENDING ,, LAND USE APPLICATION SITE DEVELOPMENT REVIEW TIGARD DATE OF NOTICE: March 12, 2010 FILE NUMBER SITE DEVELOPMENT REVIEW(SDR) 2009-00007 (Type II Land Use Application) FILE NAME: AUTOZONE RETAIL STORE OWNER Bar-Am,LLC APPLICANT: AutoZone— Store Development Isaac Baruch Department 8320,Mitch Bramlitt 1416 3rd Avenue 123 S.Front Street Seattle,WA 98101 Memphis,TN 3 8103 REQUEST: The applicant is proposing to demolish an existing building and construct a 6,800 square foot auto-related retail business on a .84-acre parcel. Site improvements will include a new building, 32 parking spaces and associated landscaping. A new sidewalk will be constructed along the front of the lot. Access ways will not be affected. LOCATION: 13405 SW Pacific Highway,Washington County Tax Map 2S102CB,Tax Lot 01802. ZONE: GG: General Commercial District. The GG zoning district is designed to accommodate a full range of retail, office and civic uses with a City-wide and even regional trade area. Except were nonconforming, residential uses are limited to single-family residences which are located on the same site as a permitted use. A wide range of uses, including but not limited to adult entertainment, automotive equipment repair and storage, miru- warehouses, utilities, heliports, medical centers, major event entertainment, and gasoline stations, are permitted conditionally. APPLICABLE REVIEW CRITERIA: Community Development Code Chapters 18.360, 18.390, 18.520, 18.705, 18.745, 18.755, 18.765, 18.795 and 1.810. YOUR RIGHT TO PROVIDE WRITTEN COMMENTS: Prior to the City making any decision on the Application,you are hereby provided a fourteen (14) day period to submit written comments on the application to the City. THE FOURTEEN (14) DAY PERIOD ENDS AT 5:00 PM ON MARCH 26,2010. All comments should be directed to Hap Watkins,Assistant Planner in the Planning Division at the City of Tigard, 13125 SW Hall Boulevard, Tigard, Oregon 97223. You may reach the City of Tigard by telephone at 503.639.4171 or bye-mail to hapCa.tigard-or.gov. ALL COMMENTS MUST BE RECEIVED BY THE CITY OF TIGARD IN WRITING PRIOR TO 5:00 PM ON THE DATE SPECIFIED ABOVE IN ORDER FOR YOUR COMMENTS TO BE CONSIDERED IN THE DECISION MAKING PROCESS THE CITY OF TIGARD APPRECIATES RECEIVING COMMENTS AND VALUES YOUR INPUT. COMMENTS WILL BE CONSIDERED AND ADDRESSED WITHIN THE NOTICE OF DECISION. A DECISION ON THIS ISSUE IS TENTATIVELY SCHEDULED FOR APRIL 26, 2010. IF YOU PROVIDE COMMENTS, YOU WILL BE SENT A COPY OF THE FULL DECISION ONCE IT HAS BEEN RENDERED. WRIT 1hN COMMENTS WILL Btk.:OME A PART OF THE PERMANEIV f PUBLIC RECORD AND SHALL CONTAIN THE FOLLOWING INFORMATION: . Address the specific"Applicable Review Criteria" described in the section above or any other criteria believed to be applicable to this proposal; • Raise any issues and/or concerns believed to be important with sufficient evidence to allow the City to provide a response; . Comments that provide the basis for an appeal to the Tigard Hearings Officer must address the relevant approval criteria with sufficient specificity on that issue. Failure of any party to address the relevant approval criteria with sufficient specificity may preclude subsequent appeals to the Land Use Board of Appeals or Circuit Court on that issue. Specific findings directed at the relevant approval criteria are what constitute relevant evidence. AFTER THE 14 DAY COMMENT PERIOD CLOSES,THE DIRECTOR SHALL ISSUE A TYPE II ADMINISTRATIVE DECISION. THE DIRECTOR'S DECISION SHALL BE MAILED TO THE APPLICANT AND TO OWNERS OF RECORD OF PROPERTY LOCATED WITHIN 500 FEET OF THE SUBJECT SITE, AND TO ANYONE ELSE WHO SUBMITTED WRITTEN COMMENTS OR WHO IS OTHERWISE ENTITLED TO NOTICE. THE DIRECTOR'S DECISION SHALL ADDRESS ALL OF THE RELEVANT APPROVAL CRITERIA. BASED UPON THE CRITERIA AND THE FACtS CONTAINED WITHIN THE RECORD, THE DIRECTOR SHALL APPROVE,APPROVE WITH CONDITIONS OR DENY THE REQUESTED PERMIT OR ACTION. SUMMARY OF THE DECISION-MAKING PROCESS: • The application is accepted by the City • Notice is sent to property owners of record within 500 feet of the proposed development area allowing a 14-day written comment period. • The application is reviewed by City Staff and affected agencies. . City Staff issues a written decision. . Notice of the decision is sent to the Applicant and all owners or contract purchasers of record of the site; all owners of record of property located within 500 feet of the site,as shown on the most recent property tax assessment roll;any City-recognized neighborhood group whose boundaries include the site; and any govermnental agency which is entitled to notice under an intergovernmental agreement entered into with the City which includes provision for such notice or anyone who is otherwise entitled to such notice. INFORMATION/EVIDENCE AVAILABLE FOR REVIEW: The application,written comments and supporting documents relied upon by the Director to make this decision are contained within the record and are available for public review at the City of Tigard Community Development Department. If you want to inspect the file, please call and make an appointment with either the project planner or the planning technicians. Copies of these items may be obtained at a cost of $.25 per page or the current rate charged for this service. Questions regarding this application should be directed to the Planning Staff indicated on the first page of this Notice under the section titled "Your Right to Provide Written Comments." d ■Lw�°�_ ♦4 , VICINITY MAP l �- :•'�.* . .S ``-F- . SOR3(109-00007 .� , t ■ , '` AUTOZONE STORE r0— II 111111 : !� �4�%s III �5■ .1. , sun ac Site 1111 Bar-Am,LLC SDR2009-00007 Isaac Baruch AUTOZONE STORE 1416 3'd Avenue Seattle,WA 98101 EXHIBIT 6 AutoZone - Store Development Department 8320,Mitch Bramlitt 123 S.Front Street Memphis,TN 3 8103 BAR-AM,LLC BY GODFATHER'S PIZZA 1416 THIRD AVE SEATTLE,WA 98101 2S102CC00500 2S102CB01500 13500 PACIFIC CORP DURDEL,CHRISTOPHER C&MARGO L BY CAPOZZOLI ADVISORY FOR 10425 SW PARK ST PENSIONS INC TIGARD,OR 97223 21500 HAGGERTY ROAD,SUITE 100 NORTHVILLE,MI 48167 2S102CB07500 2S102CB07300 13500 PACIFIC CORP FERNANDO,ANIL NIHAL KANWAR& BY CAPOZZOLI ADVISORY FERNANDO,ANNIE ELIZABETH PENSIONS, INC 18240 MEADOWLARK LN 21500 HAGGERTY ROAD,SUITE 100 LAKE OSWEGO,OR 97034 NORTHVILLE,MI 48167 2S102CB01802 2S102CB03500 BAR-AM,LLC GOOD SHEPHERD LUTHERAN HOME OF T BY GODFATHER'S PIZZA 831 SW 17TH AVE 1416 THIRD AVE PORTLAND,OR 97205 SEATTLE WA,98 2S102CB05400 2S102CB01200 BIDDLE,EDWARD H REV LIV TRUST HESS,DAVID A&GAIL K BY MARJORIE J IRVINE& 13170 SW GRANT AVE LAURIE J BIDDLE TRS TIGARD,OR 97223 PO BOX 517 GATES,OR 97346 2S103DA05900 2S103DA06000 BISHOP,WILBUR A AND MARTHA E HOLCOMBE,GERALD A& PO BOX 23832 BELINDA M TIGARD,OR 97281 13485 SW WATKINS ST TIGARD,OR 97223 2S102CB02100 2S102CB01600 CACH FAMILY SMALL PROPERTIES LLC HOLCOMBE,RYAN&KATIE BY REGENCY MANAGEMENT INC 10395 SW PARK ST 12488 SW AUTUMNVIEW ST TIGARD,OR 97223 TIGARD,OR 97224 2S103DD00200 2S102CC00700 CEARLEY,DARRELL A& HORTON,DENNIS M&ELISABETH A ANGELA M 19220 VIEW DR 13530 SW WATKINS AVE WEST LINN,OR 97068 TIGARD,OR 97223 2S102CB00302 2S102CB01700 CJ GLOBAL LLC KIMMEL,KRISTA L PO BOX 5668 10365 SW PARK ST ALOHA,OR 97006 TIGARD,OR 97223 2S102CC09000 2S102CC01000 DDHK VENTURES LLC KUBIN CARON 12604 SW 60TH CT BY NORRIS&STEVENS PORTLAND,OR 97219 621 SW MORRISON ST#800 PORTLAND,OR 97205 2 •2CC09 $0 2S102CB05500 DDH' ' URES LLC MARGUTH,VAL M TR& 126$ .0TH CT ELIZABETH TR •RTLAND,OR 97219 12416 NW LILYWOOD DR PORTLAND,OR 97229 2S102CC00102 2S102CB01100 MCDONALD,JOE D O'CONNOR,S CASEY 13555 SW CRESMER DR 13150 SW GRANT AVE TIGARD,OR 97223 TIGARD,OR 97223 2S102CB07100 2S102CC00311 MEDINA,LEE D&DEBRA OLSON,DEANNA KAY& 10453 SW PARK ST BANGAY,PETER JR TIGARD,OR 97223 10210 SW 77TH AVE TIGARD,OR 97223 2S102CB06900 2S103DD00401 MISKA,EDWARD P& OWENS,JOHN W&DEBORAH A MISKA,PHYLLIS MAE& 13525 SW WATKINS GADBAUGH,WAYNE R TIGARD,OR 97223 745 THIRD ST LAKE OSWEGO,OR 97034 2S103DA04701 2S102CB02300 MOAR,PATRICIA C TRUSTEE PACIFIC PROPERTIES 4114 SW FLOWER ST BY MARTIN JOHNSON PORTLAND,OR 97221 13200 SW PACIFIC HWY TIGARD,OR 97223 • 102CB0746' 2S102CB06700 MO P• 'ICIA C TRUSTEE PACIFIC PROPERTIES GENERAL 411• h OWER ST PARTNERSHIP •RTLAND, +R 97221 13200 SW PACIFIC HWY TIGARD,OR 97223 103DA0470 2S103DA06100 M ,P CIA C TRUSTEE PAPEN,CINDY 4114 LOWER ST 13450 SW WATKINS ST TLAN OR 97221 TIGARD,OR 97223 2S102CB07600 2S103DA05000 MORTENSEN,TIM&SHANNON PATINO,CARLOS SR&BLANCA 13155 SW GRANT AVE 10605 SW COOK LN TIGARD,OR 97223 TIGARD,OR 97223 2S102CC00310 2S102CB02000 MUNCH,BRIAN A PETTIJOHN,PAUL 13495 SW CRESMER DR 25710 E BRIGHT AVE TIGARD,OR 97223 WELCHES,OR 97067 2S103DA04900 2S102CB01800 MURFINSIMMONS,MATTHEW T& PUBLIC STORAGE MICAHLE INSTITUTIONAL FUND 13365 SW WATKINS DEPT PT-OR26410 TIGARD,OR 97223 PO BOX 25025 GLENDALE,CA 91201 2S103DA00600 2S103DA04600 NOONAN,DAVID W&YUKO PUGSLEY,CLAYTON A& 13210 SW WATKINS AVE FREEMAN-PUGSLEY,CAMIE TIGARD,OR 97223 10570 SW PARK ST TIGARD,OR 97223 2S103DD00300 2S102CB01804 RAMIREZ,KEVIN P&LEEANNE M WEBER COASTAL BELLS LIMITED 13570 SW WATKINS AVE WEBER,EDUARD TIGARD,OR 97223 840 CONGER ST EUGENE,OR 97402 2S102CB07700 2S102CB01901 RUTHERFORD,SHERYL L WEBER COASTAL BELLS LTD PTNRSHP 13157 SW GRANT AVE PO BOX 23408 TIGARD,OR 97223 EUGENE,OR 97402 2S102CC00309 SHOVE,DONALD D SHIRLEY G 13485 SW CRESMER DR TIGARD,OR 97223 2S103DA06200 SNELL,LARRY D& DOYLE-SNELL,MAUREEN M 2218 E EVERGREEN ST MESA,AZ 85213 2S102CB06801 SOLIS,EDGAR TRUSTEE PO BOX 231193 TIGARD,OR 97281 2S102CB07200 SUBRAMANIAN,LAXMANPRAKASH& ADINARAYANAN,SASIKALA 10441 SW PARK ST TIGARD,OR 97223 2S103DA04700 URL,JOY B 13370 SW WATKINS TIGARD,OR 97223 S103DA04 0 U JO 13 W WATKINS GARD, R 97223 2S103DD00100 VITIRITTI,PIETRO&PASQUALINA TRUSTEES 14115 SW 157TH TIGARD,OR 97224 2S102CB05300 W-2 PROPERTIES LLC 12415 SW 122ND AVE TIGARD,OR 97223 Gretchen Buehner 13249 SW 136th Place Tigard, OR 97224 Don & Dorothy Erdt 13760 SW 121st Avenue Tigard, OR 97223 Ellen Beilstein 14630 SW 139th Avenue Tigard, OR 97224 Todd Harding and Blake Hering Jr. Norris Beggs & Simpson 121 SW Morrison, Suite 200 Portland, OR 97204 Vanessa Foster 13085 SW Howard Drive Tigard, OR 97223 Susan Beilke 11755 SW 114th Place Tigard, OR 97223 CPO 4B 16200 SW Pacific Highway, Suite H242 Tigard, OR 97224 Patricia Keerins 12195 SW 121st Avenue Tigard, OR 97223 John Frewing 7110 SW Lola Lane Tigard, OR 97223 CITY OF TIGARD - CENTRAL INTERESTED PARTIES (i:\curpin\setup\labels\CIT Central.doc) UPDATED: 18-Sep-09 Josh Thomas ' .san Be', e 10395 SW Bonanza 117 ' W 114th Place Tigard, OR 97224 .gard, • 97223 -tchen B : ner David Walsh 132, 136th Place 10236 SW Stuart Court Ts.rd, 0' 97224 Tigard, OR 97223 Paul Owen odd Harding a • Blake Hering Jr. 10335 SW Highland Drive No Be. : Simpson Tigard, OR 97224 121 orrison, Suite 200 P:rtland, 0 97204 Tim Esau PO Box 230695 Tigard, OR 97281 .'0 4B 1621. . W Pacific Highway, Suite H242 •gard, 0' 97224 Ross Sundberg 16382 SW 104th Avenue Tigard, OR 97224 Brian Wegener 9830 SW Kimberly Drive Tigard, OR 97224 Joseph Dyar 10285 SW Highland Drive Tigard, OR 97224-4668 Rex Caffall 13205 SW Village Glenn Tigard, OR 97223 ••i Fr- g 71 ! Lola Lane gard, 0' 67223 CITY OF TIGARD - SOUTH INTERESTED PARTIES fog. I of 11 (i:\curolnlsetuollabels\CIT South.docl UPDATED: 16-Dec-08 r pp! AFFIDAVIT OF MAILING I, Patricia L. Lunsford, being first duly sworn/affirm,on oath depose and say that I am a Planning Assistant for the City of Tigard, Washington County, Oregon and that I served the following: © NOTICF OF DECISION FOR SDR2009-00007/AUTOZONE RETAIL STORE (Fae No/Name Reference) AMENDED NOTICE City of Tigard Planning Director A copy of the said notice being hereto attached,marked Exhibit"A",and by reference made a part hereof,was mailed to each named person(s) at the address(s) shown on the attached list(s),marked Exhibit"B",and by reference made a part hereof, on May 3,2010, and deposited in the United States Mail on May 3,2010,postage prepaid. - ;$2,66 (Person that Prepared Notice / STATE OF OREGON County of Washington ss. City of Tigard Subscribed and sworn/affirmed before me on the o--0 day of I- ,2010. -17* OFFICIAL SEAL i • SHIRLEY L TREAT 4„ _e a_-f NOTARY PUBLIC-OREGON v l. COMMISSION NO.416777 NO ARY PUBLI FOREGO () MY COMMISSION EXPIRES APRIL 25.2011 My Commission Expires: ' -2-S EXHIBIT Pk NOTICE OF TYPE II DECISION • SITE DEVELOPMENT REVIEW (SDR) 2009-00007 AUTOZONE RETAIL STORE TIGARD 120 DAYS = 07/08/2010 SECTION I. APPLICATION SUMMARY FILE NAME: AUTOZONE RETAIL STORE CASE NO.: Site Development Review (SDR) SDR2009-00007 PROPOSAL: The applicant is requesting Site Development Review approval for a 6,800 square foot retail store with associated parking and site improvements on an approximately 36,590 square foot (0.84-acre) site on Pacific Highway in place of a 3,500 square foot restaurant. APPLICANT: AutoZone-Department 8320 OWNER: Bar-Am,LLC Atm: Mitch Bramlitt Attn: Isaac Baruch 123 S. Front Street 1416 3`d Avenue Memphis,TN 38103 Seattle,WA 98101 LOCATION: 13405 SW Pacific Highway;Washington County Tax Map 2S102CB,Tax Lot 01802. ZONE: C-G: General Commercial. The C-G zoning district is designed to accommodate a full range of retail, office and civic uses with a City-wide and even regional trade area. Except where non-conforming,residential uses are limited to single-family residences which are located on the same site as a permitted use. A wide range of uses, including but not limited to adult entertainment, automotive equipment repair and storage, mini-warehouses, utilities, heliports, medical centers, major event entertainment,and gasoline stations,are permitted conditionally. APPLICABLE REVIEW Community Development Code Chapters 18.360, 18.390, 18.520, 18.705, 18.725, CRITERIA: 18.745, 18.755, 18.765, 18.780, 18.790, 18.795 and 18.810. SECTION II. DECISION Notice is hereby given that the City of Tigard Community Development Director's designee has APPROVED the above request subject to certain conditions of approval. The findings and conclusions on which the decision is based are noted in Section VI. SDR2009-00007 AutoZone Retail Store Decision Page 1 of 21 CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL THE FOLLOWING CONDITIONS SHALL BE SATISFIED PRIOR TO THE ISSUANCE OF SITE PERMITS AND BUILDING PERMITS: The applicant shall prepare a cover letter and submit it, along with an su orting documents and/or plans that address the following requirements to the NT PLANNING DIVISION, ATTN: HAP WATKINS, 503-718-2440. The cover letter shall clearly identify where in the submittal the required information is found: 1. The applicant shall submit fire flow demand calculations and flow test for the hydrant nearest the project site per TVF&R comments listed in SECTION VIII of this decision. Approved fire apparatus access roadways and fire fighting water supplies shall be installed and operational prior to any combustible construction or storage of combustible materials on the site. 2. The applicant shall provide revised plans that show the storm water control vault shown on Sheet 0.0 re-located onto private property from its current location in the planter strip, show the new parking lot storm drain lines re-located to the revised water control vault location, and show the direction of flow for the water detention system. 3. The applicant shall provide revised plans that indicate vision clearance lines at both approaches on plan sheets L1.0 and/or 12.0 which shall indicate no trees or other obstructions will restrict the vision clearance area. 4. The applicant shall provide revised.plans to construct a relocated bus stop per Tri Met comments listed in SECTION VIII of this decision. 5. The applicant shall contact Tri Met two weeks prior to work in the right-of-way to allow for temporary location of the bus stop (Contact:Ben Baldwin,503-962-2140). 6. The applicant shall submit to the City a revised landscape plan showing, street trees spaced appropriatelyy as affected by the applicable Tri Met bus loading requirement and bus stop.re-location (subject to( DOT and Tn-Met review and approval) listed in SEC,11ON VIII of this decision. 7. The applicant shall position fencing as directed by the project arborist and detailed on tree preservation sheet L1.0. The applicant shall allow access by the City Arborist for the purpose of monitoring and inspection of the tree protection to verify that the tree protection measures are performing adequately. If work is required within an established tree protection zone, the project arborist shall prepare a proposal detail n the construction techniques to be employed and the likely impacts to the trees. The proposal shill be reviewed and approved by the City Arborist before proposed work can proceed within a tree protection zone. 8. The applicant shall have an on-going responsibility to ensure that the Project Arborist has submitted written reports to the City Arborist, at least once every two weeks as the Project Arborist monitors the construction activities from initial tree protection zone (TPZ) fencing installation through the building construction phases. Tree protection measures may be removed and final inspection authorized upon review and approval by the City Arborist. 9. Prior to site work,the applicant shall submit a cash assurance (letter of credit or cash deposit) in the amount of $1,125 for the equivalent value of mitigation required (9 caliper inches of proposed mitigation tree planting x$125/caliper inch). 10. The applicant shall submit a written sign-off letter from Pride Disposal based on a detailed facility plan that demonstrates the design of the facility is consistent with TI VIC18.755.040.F. SDR2009-00007 AutoZone Retail Store Decision Page 2 of 21 The applicant shall prepare a cover letter and submit it, along with any supporting documents and/or plans that address the following requirements to the ENGINEERING DIVISION, ATTN: GUS DUENAS, 503-718-2470. -The cover letter shall clearly identify where in the submittal the required information is found: 11. Prior to issuance of the Site Permit,the applicant shall dedicate additional right-of-way along the SW Pacific Highway frontage to increase the existing right-of-way from 40 feet to 52 feet from its centerline. 12. Prior to issuance of a site permit, a Public Facility Improvement (PFI) permit is required for this project to cover the work in the right-of-way and the on-site storm water detention and treatment facilities. Six (6) sets of detailed public improvement plans shall be submitted for review to the Development Engineer. NOTE:these plans are in addition to any drawings required by the Building Division and should only include sheets relevant to storm drainage, water quality and detention. Public Facility Improvement (PH)permit shall conform to City of Ti ardPublic Improvement Design Standards which are available at City Hall and the City's web page www.tigard or.gov). An erosion control lan shall be provided as part of the PFI permit drawings. The plan shall conform to Clean Water Services Design and Construction Standards(Resolution and Order No. 07-20) Chapter 2.No work on-site shall commence until the erosion control permits are issued. 13. The PH permit plan submittal shall include the exact legal name, address and telephone number of the individual or corporate entity who will be designated as the "Permitee", and who will provide the financial assurance for the public improvements. For example, specify if the entity is a corporation limited partnership, LLC, etc. Also specify the state within which the entity is incorporated and provide the name of the corporate contact person.. Failure to provide accurate information to the Engineering Department will delay processing of project documents. 14. Prior to issuance of the Site Permit the applicant shall obtain ODOT approval and permits needed for construction of the sidewalk, planter strip, water quality and detention facilities. A copy of the permit shall be provided to the City Engineering Department. THE FOLLOWING CONDITIONS SHALL BE SATISFIED PRIOR TO FINAL BUILDING INSPECTION: The applicant shall prepare a cover letter and submit it, along with an su oiling documents and/or plans that address the following requirements to the NT PLANNING DIVISION, ATTN: HAP WATKINS, 503-718-2440. The cover letter shall clearly identify where in the submittal the required information is found: 15. A Knox Box for access is required for this building. Contact the Fire Marshal's Office for an order form and instructions regarding installation and placement. 16. Prior to final building inspection,and prior to installation of any signage,the applicant shall submit a sign permit application for all proposed signage. 17. Prior to final building inspection the planning division shall be contacted to conduct an inspection to verify that the project was completed in accordance with this decision and the approved plans. 18. Prior to issuance of any Certificates of Occupancy,the applicant/owner shall record deed restrictions to the effect that any existing tree,greater than 6" diameter maybe removed only if the tree dies or is hazardous according to a certified arborist. The deed restriction may be removed or will be considered invalid if all trees preserved in accordance with this decision should either die or be removed as hazardous trees. 19. Prior to Certificate of Occupancy the project arborist shall submit a letter to the City Arborist to certify that all of the mitigation trees were properly planted per the approved Tree Mitigation Plan in order to set the starting point of the two year tree establishment penod:Failure to plant and provide documentation of mitigation tree planting,by the project arbonst within 6 months of certificate of occupancy issuance shall result in the forfeiture of the cash assurance to the City's tree fund. SDR2009-00007 AutoZone Retail Store Decision Page 3 of 21 20. After the two-year establishment period, the applicant shall provide a re-inventory of the mitigation trees conducted by a certified arborist in order to document mitigation tree survival, and compliance with the approved'Tree Mitigation Plan. The applicant shall prepare a cover letter and submit it, along with any supporting documents and/or plans that address the following requirements to the ENGINEERING DIVISION, ATTN: GUS DUENAS, 503-718-2470. The cover letter shall clearly identify where in the submittal the required information is found: 21. Prior to a final building inspection, the applicant shall complete detention and water quality facilities. The applicant's engineer shall submit documentation to the-Developpm��e��nt Engineer certifying that the water quality treatment facilities are constructed in accordance with C.'VVS standards. 22. Prior to final building inspection, the applicant shall enter into an agreement with the City on City furnished forms for maintenance of the private water quality on-site. That agreement will be recorded and the City will be periodically monitoring the facility for compliance with the terms of the maintenance agreement. 23. Prior to a final building inspection, the applicant shall provide the City with as-built drawings of the detention and water quality facilities as follows: 1) 3 mil mylar, 2) a disk of the as-builts in `DWG" format, if available; otherwise "DXF" will be acceptable, and 3) the as-built drawings shall be tied to the City's GPS network. The applicant's engineer shall provide the City with an electronic file with fpoints for each structure (manaoles, catch basins, water valves, hydrants and other water system eatures) in the development, and their respective X and Y State Plane Coordinates, referenced to NAD 83 (91). THIS APPROVAL SHALL BE VALID FOR EIGHTEEN(18) MONTHS FROM THE EFFECTIVE DATE OF THIS DECISION. SECTION III. BACKGROUND INFORMATION Site History: Staff conducted a search of City records for the subject property and found that the site has been an eating and drinking establishment, a ermitted use since the site was developed. The site is bounded by a sell storage facility to the south and- est and a fast food eating establishment to the north. Vicinity Information: The su?ect site is located at 13405 SW Pacific Highway;WMTM 2S102CB,Tax Lot 01802. The property is zoned C-G as are all the abutting properties. The site fronts on Pacific Highway. Site Information and Proposal Description: The applicant is requesting Site Development Review approval to construct a 6,800 square foot AutoZone Retail Store with associated parking and site improvements on an approximately 36,590 square foot (0.84- acre) site. The new building will replace a 3,500 square foot restaurant.Landscaping,street trees,replacement trees and 32 parking spaces are Manned. A new sidewalk, planter strip and street trees will be placed along the front of the parcel and a Tri-Met bus stop will be moved to the south along Pacific Highway. SECTION IV. NEIGHBORHOOD COMMENTS The Tigard Community Development Code requires that property owners within 500 feet of the subject site be notified of the proposal, and be given an opportunity for written comments and/or oral testimony prior to a decision being made. In additi staff has posted a notice centered on the frontage of the site visible from the street. No comments were received during the comment period from neighboring landowners or interested parties. SDR2009-00007 AutoZone Retail Store Decision Page 4 of 21 SECTION V. SUMMARY OF APPLICABLE REVIEW CRITERIA A. Zoning Districts 18.50 Commercial Zoning Districts B. Applicable Development Code Standards 18.705 Access Egress and Circulation 18.725 Environmental Performance Standards 18.745 Landscaping and Screening 18.755 Mixed Solid Waste and Recyclable Storage 18.765 Off-Street parking and loading requirements 18.780 Signs 18.790 Tree Removal 18.795 Visual Clearance C. Specific Site Development Review Approval Criteria 18.360 Site Development Review D. Street and Utility Improvement Standards 18.810 Street and Utility Improvement Standards E. Impact Study 18.390 Impact Study SECTION VI. APPLICABLE REVIEW CRITERIA A. ZONING DISTRICTS Commercial Zoning District: Section 18.520.020 Lists the description of the Commercial Zoning Districts. The site is located in the GG: General Commercial zoning district. The present use of the site is for a 3,500 square foot restaurant. The proposed use, Retail Sales, is listed in the use classifications under "General Retail" as a use permitted outright in the zone. Development Standards: Section 18.520.040.B states that development standards in commercial zoning districts are contained in Table 18.520.2: TABLE 18.520.2 DEVELOPMENT STANDARDS IN COMMERCIAL ZONES STANDARD C-G Proposed Minimum Lot Size None 36,590 sq ft - Detached unit - - Boarding,lodging,morning house Minimum Lot Width 50' App 249 ft Minimum Setbacks - Front yard 0' 52 ft - Side facing street on corner&through lots 0' - - Side yard 0' 62 ft&92 ft - Side or rear yard abutting more restrictive zoning district 0' - - Rear yard 0' 4 ft - Distance between front of garage&property line abutting a public or private - - street. Maximum Height 45 ft 21 ft Maximum Site Coverage 85% 85% Minimum Landscape Requirement 15% 15% FINDING: As demonstrated in the table above, the proposed development complies with the underlying zone development standards. SDR2009-00007 AutoZone Retail Store Decision Page 5 of 21 B. APPLICABLE DEVELOPMENT CODE STANDARDS Access,Egress and Circulation(18.705): Walkways: 18.705.030(F) requires that on-site pedestrian walkways comply with the following standards: Walkways shall extend from the ground floor entrances or from the ground floor landing of stairs, ramps, or elevators of all commercial, institutional, and industrial uses, to the streets which provide the required access and egress. Walkways shall provide convenient connections between buildings in multi-building commercial, institutional, and industrial complexes. Unless impractical, walkways shall be constructed between new and existing developments and neighboring developments; As described in the applicant's plans and narrative, on-site pedestrian walkways consistent with this standard are proposed between the parking area,the building, and the Pacific Highwaynght-of-way. Wherever required walkways cross vehicle access driveways or parking lots, such crossings shall be designed and located for pedestrian safety. Required walkways shall be physically separated from motor vehicle traffic and parking by either a minimum 6-inch vertical separation (curbed) or a minimum 3-foot horizontal separation, except that pedestrian crossings of traffic aisles are permitted for distances no greater than 36 feet if appropriate landscaping, pavement markings, or contrasting pavement materials are used. Walkways shall be a minimum of four feet in width exclusive of vehicle overhangs and obstructions such as mailboxes, benches, bicycle racks, and sign posts, and shall be in compliance with ADA standards; As described in the applicant's plans and narrative, on-site pedestrian walkways are proposed across the parking lot from the building to the right-of-way consistent with this standard. Required walkways shall be paved with hard surfaced materials such as concrete, asphalt, stone, brick, etc. Walkways may be required to be lighted and/or signed as needed for safety purposes. Soft-surfaced public use pathways may be provided only if such pathways are provided in addition to required pathways. The plan depicts concrete sidewalks at the building and striped asphalt to the new sidewalk in the right-of- way which meet the standard. Access Management: Section 18.705.030.H.1 states that an access report shall be submitted with all new development proposals which verifies design of driveways and streets are safe by meeting adequate stacking needs, sight distance and deceleration standards as set by ODOT, Washington County, the City and AASHTO. The proposed retail site will have two shared access points both existing,that will remain unchanged. One is a shared access via a signalized intersection to the south of'the property and the other to the north is a 38.75 foot shared driveway. ODOT has indicated that these accesses are acceptable. A preliminary sight distance report was prepared December 16, 2009 by HDJ Design Oase B 1 and Gr both accesses. The report found that both had sight distances equal to that required per AASHTO both exceeded the minimum by a factor of 2. Since the accesses are to remain unchanged and the sight distances are satisfactory, this report is also a final sight distance report.This standard has been met. Section 18.705.030.H.2 states that driveways shall not be permitted to be placed in the influence area of collector or arterial street intersections. Influence area of intersections is that area where queues of traffic commonly form on approach to an intersection. The minimum driveway setback from a collector or arterialystreet intersection shall be 150 feet, measured from the right-of-way line of the intersecting street to the throat of the proposed driveway. The setback may be greater depending upon the influence area, as determined from City Engineer review of a traffic impact report submitted by the applicant's traffic engineer. In a case where a project has less than 150 feet of street frontage, the applicant must explore any option for shared access with the adjacent parcel. If shared access is not possible or practical, the driveway shall be placed as far from the intersection as possible. SDR2009-00007 AutoZone Retail Store Decision Page 6 of 21 Pacific Highway is classified as an Arterial on the City's Transportation System Plan (TSP). Access to the site will be via the existing shared access to the north of the site and the shared access to the south of the site which is signalized. The northerly site access is approximately 250 feet from the access at a signalized intersection,thereby meeting this standard. Minimum Access Requirements for Commercial and Industrial Use: Section 18.705.030.J provides the minimum access requirements for commercial and industrial uses: Table 18.705.3 indicates that the required access width for developments with fewer than 100 parking spaces is one 30-foot accesses with 24 feet of pavement. Vehicular access shall be provided to commercial or industrial uses, and shall be located to within 50 feet of the primary ground floor entrances; additional requirements for truck traffic may be placed as conditions of site development review. The applicant's site plan shows both shared accesses exceed these requirements and are consistent with this standard. Environmental performance standards (18.725): These standards require that federal and state environmental laws, rules and regulations be applied to development within the City of Tigard. Section 18.725.030 (Performance Standards) regulates: Noise,visible emissions,vibration and odors glare and heat,and insects and rodents. Noise: For the purposes of noise regulation, the provisions of Sections 7.41.130 through 7.40.210 of the Tigard Municipal Code shall apply. Visible Emissions: Within the commercial zoning districts and the industrial park (IP) zoning district, there shall be no use, operation or activity which results in a stack or other point- source emission, other than an emission from space heating, or the emission of pure uncombined water (steam) which is visible from a property line. Department of Environmental Quality(DEQ) rules for visible emissions (340-21-015 and 340-28-070) apply. Vibration: No vibration other than that caused by highway vehicles, trains and aircraft is permitted in any given zoning district which is discernible without instruments at the property line of the use concerned. Odors: The emissions of odorous,gases or other matter in such quantities as to be readily detectable at any point beyond the property line of the use creating the odors is prohibited. DEQ rules for odors (340-028-090) apply. Glare and heat: No direct or sky reflected glare, whether from floodlights or from high temperature processes such as combustion or welding, which is visible at the lot line shall be permitted, and; 1) there shall be no emission or transmission of heat or heated air which is discernible at the lot line of the source; and 2) these regulations shall not apply to signs or floodlights in parking areas or construction equipment at the time of construction or excavation work otherwise permitted by this title. Insects and rodents: All materials including wastes shall be stored and all grounds shall be maintained in a manner which will not attract or aid the propagation of insects or rodents or create a health hazard. This is a retail sales establishment use, which is permitted outright within the GG zone. The applicant's narrative states that the above standards will be met. Based on the provision of adequate trash and recycling area, and the fact that the proposed use is not likely to generate noise, visible emissions, odors, glare and heat, or harbor insects and rodents, this standard is satisfied. Landscaping and Screening(18.745): Street Trees: Section 18.745.040 states that all development projects fronting on a public street or a private drive more than 100 feet in length shall be required to plant street trees in accordance with Section 18.745.040.C. Section 18.745.040.0 requires that street trees be spaced between 20 and 40 feet apart depending on the size classification of the tree at maturity(small,medium or large). SDR2009-00007 AutoZone Retail Store Decision Page 7 of 21 The applicant has provided a landscape plan (Sheet L 2.0) that shows acceptable street trees along the frontage in the planter strip. However, the plan must be revised to incorporate the comments from Tn-Met regarding the re-construction of the bus stop passenger loading areas and re-location of the bus stop sign. Buffering and Screening: Section 18.745.050 states that buffering and screening is required to reduce the impacts on adjacent uses which are of a different type. Buffering and/or screening are required for dissimilar uses. The subject site is zoned C-G and is either surrounded by abutting property zoned GG or a public right-of- way. Therefore,no buffering or screening is required. Screening: Special Provisions: Section 18.745.050.E requires the screening of parking and loading areas. Landscaped parking areas shall include special design features which effectively screen the parking lot areas from view. Planting matenals to be installed should achieve a relative balance between low lying and vertical shrubbery and trees. Trees shall be planted in landscaped islands in all parking areas, and shall be equally distributed on the basis of one (1) tree for each seven(7) parking-spaces in order to provide a canopy effect. The minimum dimension on the landscape islands shaall be three (3) feet wide and the landscaping shall be protected from vehicular damage-by some form of wheel guard or curb. The parking lot is comprised of 32 parking spaces. It is screened from adjacent properties to the north,west, and south by trees and shrubs. The center of the frontage (east bound is is screened by trees and shrubs at the north and south ends with a 3 foot screen wall between. Street trees further enhance the screening from the right-of-way. The parking island tree plantings have been increased from 2 to 3 inch caliper to increase the canopy effect in lieu of placing one tree each seven parking spaces.This standard is satisfied. Screening Of Service Facilities. Except for one-family and two-family dwellings, any refuse container or disposal area and service facilities such as gas meters and air conditioners which would otherwise be visible from a public street, customer or resident parking area, any public facility or any residential area shall be screened from view by placement of a solid wood fence or masonry wall between five and eight feet in height. All refuse materials shall be contained within the screened area; There is adequate information provided in the plans to establish adequate screening of facilities. Therefore, this standard is satisfied. Screening of Refuse Containers. Except for one- and two-family dwellings, any refuse container or refuse collection area which would be visible from a public street, parking lot, residential or commercial area, or any public facility such as a school or park shall be screened or enclosed from view by placement of a solid wood fence, masonry wall or evergreen hedge. All refuse shall be contained within the screened area. The applicant's site plan and narrative describe a six-foot-high masonry trash enclosure. Therefore, this standard is satisfied. Mixed Solid Waste and Recyclables Storage (18.755): Chapter 18.755 requires that new construction incorporates functional and adequate space for on-site storage and efficient collection of mixed solid waste and source separated Recyclables prior to pick- up and removal by haulers. The applicant must choose one (1) of the following four (4) methods to demonstrate compliance: Minimum Standard, Waste Assessment, Comprehensive Recycling Plan, or Franchised Hauler Review and Sign-Off. The applicant will have to submit evidence or a plan which indicates compliance with this section. Regardless of which method chosen,the applicant will have to submit a written sign-off from the franchise hauler regarding the facility location and compatibility. The applicant has not submitted a letter from Pride Disposal that states the location of the facility is satisfactory. The applicant shall submit a detailed plan and written sign-off letter from Pride Disposal that demonstrates the design of the proposed facility is consistent with this standard. SDR2009-00007 AutoZone Retail Store Decision Page 8 of 21 Location Standards. To encourage its use, the storage area for source-separated recyclables shall be co-located with the storage area for residual mixed solid waste; Indoor and outdoor storage areas shall comply with Uniform Building and Fire Code requirements; Storage area space requirements can be satisfied with a single location or multiple locations, and can combine both interior and exterior locations; Exterior storage areas can be located within interior side yard or rear yard areas. Exterior storage areas shall not be located within a required front yard setback or in a yard adjacent to a public or private street; Exterior storage areas shall be located in central and visible locations on a site to enhance security for users; Exterior storage areas can be located in a parking area, if the proposed use provides at feast the minimum number of parking spaces required for the use after deducting the area used for storage. Storage areas shall be appropriately screened according_to the provisions in 18.755.050 C, design standards; The storage area shall be accessible for collection vehicles and located so that the storage area will not obstruct pedestrian or vehicle traffic movement on the site or on public streets adjacent to the site. The recyclables container is accessed from the parking lot and is visible in order to enhance security for users. The proposed recyclables container will not occupy any required parking stalk and screening has been reviewed-to show conformance to Tigard standards previously in this decision. Therefore, this standard is met. Design Standards. The dimensions of the storage area shall accommodate containers consistent with current methods of local collection; Storage containers shall meet Uniform Fire Code standards and be made and covered with waterproof materials or situated in a covered area; Exterior storage areas shall be enclosed by a sight-obscuring fence, wall, or hedge at least six feet in height. Gate openings which allow access to users and haulers shall be provided. Gate openings for haulers shall be a minimum of 10 feet wide and shall be capable of being secured in a closed and open position; Storage area(s) and containers shall be clearly-labeled to indicate the type of materials accepted. The applicant has submitted a narrative and plans that reflect a 12 foot by 18 foot masonry waste and recyclable container enclosure with two 9 foot metal gates. Details of the enclosure and approval of the waste hauler have been required previously under this code section and this standard can be met conditionally. Off-Street Parking and Loading(18.765): Location of vehicle parking: Off-street parking spaces for single-family and duplex dwellings and single-family attached dwellings shall be located on the same lot with the dwellings. Off-street parking lots for uses not listed above shall be located not further than 200 feet from the building or use that they are required to serve, measured in a straight line from the building with the following exceptions: a) commercial and industrial uses which require more than 40 parking spaces may provide for the spaces in excess of the required first 40 spaces up.to a distance of 300 feet from the primary site; The 40 parking spaces which remain on the primary site must be available for users in the following order of priority: 1) Disabled-accessible spaces; 2) Short-term spaces; 3) Long-term preferential carpool and vanpool spaces; 4) Long-term spaces. The parking lot associated with this project is directly adjacent to the proposed building. This standard is satisfied. Joint Parking: Owners of two or more uses, structures or parcels of land may agree to utilize jointly the same parking and loading spaces when the peak hours of operation do not overlay, subject to the following: 1) The size of the joint parking facility shall be at least as large as the number of vehicle parking spaces required by the larger(est) use per Section 18.765.070; 2) Satisfactory legal evidence shall be presented to the Director in the form of deeds, leases or contracts to establish the joint use; 3 If a Joint use arrangement is subsequently terminated, or if the uses change, the requirements of this title thereafter apply to each separately. Joint parking is not proposed with this application. Therefore,this standard does not apply. SDR2009-00007 AutoZone Retail Store Decision Page 9 of 21 Parking in Mixed-Use Projects: In mixed-use projects, the required minimum vehicle parking shall be determined using the following formula. 1) Primary use, i.e., that with the largest proportion of total floor area within the development, at 100% of the minimum vehicle arking required for that use in Section 18.765.060; 2) Secondary use, i.e., that with the second largest percentage of total floor area within the development, at 90% of the vehicle parking required for that use in Section 18.765.060; 3) Subsequent use or uses, at 80% of the vehicle parking required for that use(s) in Section 18.765.060; 4) The maximum parking allowance shall be 150% of the total minimum parking as calculated above. This proposal is not considered a mixed-use project as it will contain only a retail store. Therefore, this standard does not apply. Preferential Long-Term Carpool/Vanpool Parking: Parking lots providing in excess of 20 Long-term parking spaces shall provide preferential long-term carpool and vanpool parking for employees, students and other regular visitors to the site. At least 5% of total long-term parking spaces shall be reserved for carpool/vanpool use. Preferential parking for carpools/vanpools shall be closer to the main entrances of the building than any other employee or student parking except parking spaces designated for use by the disabled. Preferential carpool/vanpool spaces shall be full-sized per requirements in Section 18.765.040N and shall be clearly designated for use only by carpools and vanpools between 7:00 AM and 5:30 PM Monday through Friday . The proposed parkin associated with the retail store development is for 32 spaces and does not provide long term parking. Therefore,this standard does not apply. Disabled-Accessible Parking: All parking areas shall be provided with the required number of parking spaces for disabled persons as specified by the State of Oregon Uniform Building Code and federal standards. Such parking spaces shall be sized,signed and marked as required by these regulations. The applicant has indicated that there will be two disabled-accessible parking spaces provided. According to ORS 447.233, incorporated through reference to the State Building Code, two such spaces are required. As shown,the site plan is in compliance with State and Federal requirements. Access Drives: With regard to access to public streets from off-street parking: access drives from the street to off- street parking or loading areas shall be designed and constructed to facilitate the flow of traffic and provide maximum safety for pedestrian and vehicular traffic on the site; the number and size of access drives shall be in accordance with the requirements of Chapter, 18.705 Access, Egress and Circulation; access drives shall be clearly and permanently marked and defined through use of rails, fences, walls or other barriers or markers on frontage not occupied by service drives; access drives shall have a minimum vision clearance in accordance with Chapter 18.795, Visual Clearance; access drives shall be improved with an asphalt or concrete surface; and excluding single-family and duplex residences, except as provided by Subsection 18.810.030.P, groups of two or more parking spaces shall be served by a service drive so that no backing movements or other maneuvering within a street or other public right-of-way will be required. The proposed access drives are shown on the site plan as two existing 37.75 foot paved accesses that are clearly marked with curbs and landscaped areas, and the parking area and access drives provide ample room to facilitate a forward entrance onto SW Pacific Highway. Visual clearance areas are shown on sheet C 5.0 of the plan. No changes are proposed for the accesses. Therefore,the standard for access drives has been satisfied. Pedestrian Access: Pedestrian access through parking lots shall be provided in accordance with Section 18.705.030.F. Where a parking area or other vehicle area has a drop-off grade separation, the property owner shall install a wall, railing, or other barrier which will prevent a slow-moving vehicle or driverless vehicle from escaping such area and which will prevent pedestrians from walking over drop-off edges. SDR2009-00007 AutoZone Retail Store Decision Page 10 of 21 There are no drop-off grade separated areas within the parking area. Therefore, this standard does not apply. Parking Lot Striping: Except for single-family and duplex residences, any area intended to be used to meet the off-street parking requirements as contained in this Chapter shall have all parking spaces clearly marked; and all interior drives and access aisles shall be clearly marked and signed to show direction of flow and maintain vehicular and pedestrian safety. The plans submitted show the parking spaces will be clearly marked with striping, consistent with this standard. Wheel Stops: Parking spaces along the boundaries of a parking lot or adjacent to interior landscaped areas or sidewalks shall be provided with a wheel stop at least four inches high located three feet back from the front of the parking stall. The front three feet of the parking stall may be concrete, asphalt or low lying landscape material that does not exceed the height of the wheel stop. This area cannot be calculated to meet landscaping or sidewalk requirements. The applicant's site plan and landscape plan (Sheet C 5.0) show complying wheel stops and protective curbs. The plans reflect that there will be no overhang of vehicles into landscaped area or sidewalks. Therefore,this standard is met. Space and Aisle Dimensions: Section 18.765.040.N states that: "except as modified for angled parking in Figures 18.765.1 and 18.765.2 the minimum dimensions for parking spaces are: 8.5 feet x 18.5 feet for a standard space and 7.5 feet x 16.5 feet for a compact space"; aisles accommodating two direction traffic, or allowing access from both ends, shall be 24 feet in width. No more than 50% of the required spaces may be compact spaces. The applicant's plans show 9 foot width and 18.5 feet depth for parking spaces in all locations, and are adequate for ADA parking. Aisle width is 26 feet wide for two way traffic.Therefore,this standard is met. Bicycle Parking Location and Access: Section 18.76550 states bicycle parking areas shall be provided at locations within 50 feet of primary entrances to structures; bicycle parking areas shall not be located within parking aisles, landscape areas or pedestrian ways; outdoor bicycle parking shall be visible from on-site buildings and/or the street. When the bicycle parking area is not visible from the street, directional signs shall be used to located the parking area; and bicycle parking may be located inside a building on a floor which has an outdoor entrance open for use and floor location which does not require the bicyclist to use stairs to gain access to the space. Exceptions may be made to the latter requirement for parking on upper stories within a multi-story residential building. The applicant's site plan shows two bicycle parking spaces on the north side of the building. These spaces are not in the loading area,parking aisles, or landscaping area. Therefore,this standard is met. Bicycle Parking Design Requirements: Section 18.765.050.C. The following design requirements apply to the installation of bicycle racks: The racks required for required bicycle parking spaces shall ensure that bicycles may be securely locked to them without undue inconvenience. Provision of bicycle lockers for long-term (employee) parking is encouraged but not required; bicycle racks must be securely anchored to the ground, wall or other structure; bicycle parking spaces shall be at least 21/2 feet by six feet long, and when covered,with a vertical clearance of seven feet. An access aisle of at least five feet wide shall be provided and maintained beside or between each row of bicycle parking; each required bicycle parking space must be accessible without moving another bicycle; required bicycle parking spaces may not be rented or leased except where required motor vehicle parking is rented or leased. At-cost or deposit fees for bicycle parking are exempt from this requirement; and areas set aside for required bicycle parking must be clearly reserved.for bicycle parking only. Outdoor bicycle parking facilities shall- be surfaced with a hard surfaced material, i.e., pavers, asphalt, concrete or similar material. This surface must be designed to remain well drained. SDR2009-00007 AutoZone Retail Store Decision Page 11 of 21 The applicant has submitted plans showing two bicycle parking spaces that are not in a vehicle parking area, loading area, landscape area, or vehicle circulation aisle. The spaces are of adequate size and have sufficient space.Therefore this standard is satisfied. Minimum Bicycle Parking Requirements: The total number of required bicycle parking spaces for each use is specified in Table 18.765.2 in Section 18.765.070.H. In no case shall there be less than two bicycle parking spaces. According to Table 18.765.2 of the Tigard Development Code, the minimum bicycle-parking requirement for a Retail Sales Establishment use is 0.3 spaces per 1,000 gross square feet. Based on the proposed 6,800 square foot building, a minimum of 2 bicycle rack spaces are required. The applicant has proposed two bicycle parking spaces,consistent with this standard. Minimum Off-Street Parking: Section 18.765.070.H states the minimum and maximum parking shall be as required in Table 18.765.2. Table 18.765.2 states the minimum parking for a Retail Sales Establishment is 3.7 spaces per 1,000 gross square feet. For the proposed 6,800 square foot building 25.16 spaces (3.7 x. 6.8.) are required. The site is within the Zone A parking area for purposes of calculating maximum number of parking spaces. The maximum number of allowed parking spaces is 34.68 (5.1 x 6.8). When fractional parking spaces are calculated, it is the City's policy to round up. Therefore, the minimum and maximum parking spaces required are 26 and 35, respectively. The applicant has proposed 32 spaces. This standard has been met Off-Street Loading Spaces: Commercial, industrial and institutional buildings or structures to be built or altered which receive and distribute material or merchandise by truck shall provide and maintain off-street loading and maneuvering space as follows: A minimum of one loading space is required for buildings with 10,000 gross square feet or more; A minimum of two loading spaces for buildings with 40,00 gross square-feet or more. The proposed building is less than 10,000 square feet.Therefore,this standard does not apply. Signs (18.780): Chapter 18.780.130.0 lists the type of allowable signs and sign area permitted in the C-G Zoning District. The applicant's narrative states that no application for a sign_permit is included with this submittal. Signage will be reviewed and permitted under a separate application.lherefore this standard does not apply. Tree Removal(18.790): Section 18.790.030 requires that a tree plan for the planting, removal and protection of trees prepared by a certified arborist shall be provided with a site development review application. The tree plan shall include identification of all existing trees, identification of a program to save existing trees or mitigate tree removal over 12 inches in caliper, which trees are tote removed, protection program defining standards and methods that will be used by the applicant to protect trees during and after construction. A tree plan and arborist's report has been provided by the applicant and contains all of the required elements. Based on the arborist report 2 of 3 trees over 12 inches diameter are to be preserved for retention of 66%. The tree to be removed-is 18 inches in diameter and 50% of the total inches removed require mitigation. The applicant is proposing to mitigate with 9 caliper inches of trees not required by other code provisions. Therefore,this standard is met. Visual Clearance Areas (18.795): Chapter 18.795 requires that a clear vision area shall be maintained on the corners of all property adjacent to intersecting right-of-ways or the intersection of a public street and a private driveway. A clear vision area shall-contain no vehicle, hedge, planting, fence, wall structure, or temporary or permanent obstruction exceeding three (3) feet in height. The code provides that obstructions that may be located in this area shall-be visually clear between three (3) and eight (8) feet in height (8) (trees may be placed within this area provided that all branches below eight(8) feet are removed). A SDR2009-00007 AutoZone Retail Store Decision Page 12 of 21 visual clearance area is the triangular area formed by measuring a 30-foot distance along the street right-of-way and the driveway, and then connecting these two (2), 30-foot distance points with a straight line. The applicant has indicated on sheet C 5.0 the acceptable vision clearance areas for both accesses. Therefore, this standard is met. FINDINGS: The applicant has provided evidence of partial compliance with the Mixed Solid Waste and Recyclables Storage standards.A waste hauler approval letter is required. The applicant has provided a landscape plan (Sheet L 2.0) that shows acceptable street trees along the frontage in the planter strip. However, the plan must be revised to incorporate the applicable Tri-Met requirements regarding the re-construction of the bus stop passenger loading areas and re-location of the bus stop sign. CONDITIONS: The applicant shall submit a written sign-off letter from Pride Disposal based on a detailed facility plan that demonstrates the design of the facility is consistent with TMC18.755.040.F. The applicant shall submit to the City a revised landscape plan showing street trees spaced appropnatel as affected by the applicable Tri-Met bus loading requirement and bus stop re-location (subject to ODOT and Tri-Met review and approval) listed in SECTION VIII of this decision. CONCLUSION: Upon completion of the two conditions mentioned above, the application will be in substantial compliance with Part B, Applicable Development Code Standards of this section. C. SPECIFIC SITE DEVELOPMENT RE VIEW APPROVAL CRITERIA Section 18.360.090(A)(2) through 18.360.090(A)(15) provides additional Site Development Review approval criteria not necessarily covered by the provisions of the previously listed sections. These additional standards are addressed immediately below with the following exceptions: The proposal contains no elements related to the provisions of the following and they are,therefore,found to be not applicable as approval standards: 18.360.090.A.3 (Multi Family Exterior Elevations); 18.360.090.A.5 (Privacy and Noise:Multi-family or Group Living Uses); 18.360.090.A.6 (Private Outdoor Areas: Multi-family Use); 18.360.090.A.7 (Shared Outdoor Recreation Areas: Multi-family Use); 18.360.090A8 (100-year floodplain); and 18.360.090.A.9 (Demarcation of Spaces). The following sections were discussed elsewhere in this decision and, therefore, will not be addressed in this section: 18.360.090.A.4 (Buffering, Screening and Compatibility Between Adjoining Uses); 18.360.090.A.12 (Landscaping); 18.360.090A13 (Drainage); 18.360.090.A.14 (Provision for the Disabled); and 18.360.090.A.15 (Provisions and Regulations of the Underlying Zone). Relationship to the Natural and Physical Environment: Buildings shall be: located to preserve existing trees, topography and natural drainage where possible based upon existing site conditions; located in areas not subject to ground slumping or sliding; located to provide adequate distance between adjoining buildings for adequate light, air circulation, and fire-fighting; and oriented with consideration for sun and wind. Trees shall be preserved to the extent possible. Replacement of trees is subject to the requirements of Chapter 18.790, Tree Removal. The applicant's plan has located the building in a considerate relationship with the natural and physical environment,consistent with this standard. SDR2009-00007 AutoZone Retail Store Decision Page 13 of 21 18.360.090.A.10 Crime Prevention and Safety: a. Windows shall be located so that areas vulnerable to crime can be surveyed by the occupants; b. Interior laundry and service areas shall be located in a way that they can be observed by others; c. Mail boxes shall be located in lighted areas having vehicular or pedestrian traffic; d. The exterior lighting levels shall be selected and the angles shall be oriented towards areas vulnerable to crime; and e. Light fixtures shall be provided in areas having heavy pedestrian or vehicular traffic and in potentially dangerous areas such as parking lots, stairs, ramps and abrupt grade changes. Fixtures shall be placed at a height so thatlight patterns overlap at a height of seven feet, which is sufficient to illuminate a person. The areas most vulnerable to crime are well lighted as shown on sheet G1 of the plans. The City of Tigard Police Department has reviewed the proposal and has no objections.Therefore this standard is satisfied. Public Transit: Provisions within the plan shall be included for providing for transit if the development proposal is adjacent to an existing or proposed transit route; the requirements for transit facilities shall be based on: the location of other transit facilities in the area; and the size and type of the proposal. The following facilities may be required after City and Tri-Met review: bus stop shelters; turnouts for buses; and connecting paths to the shelters. Tri-Met was given the narrative and plans for the proposed development and provided these comments: This site is served by bus stop #4254 adjacent to the proposed AutoZone store. Ridership records indicate this stop should be designed for two passenger loading pads and re-located south of the present location. Revised-plans will be required as a condition of approval FINDING: Based on the analysis above, these specific applicable development review standards can be met conditionally. CONDITION: Applicant shall submit plans that reflect a 10 foot loading pad designed to City of Tigard Sidewalk Standards beginning approximately 55 feet north of the crosswalk for the front door of the bus, a 10 foot landscape area without trees, and a second 10 foot loading pad. Street trees can be planted immediately south and north of the 30 foot bus stop. The sign will move approximately 77 feet south to the south edge of the bus stop. Applicant shall contact Tri-Met two weeks rior to commencement of work in the right of way so a temporary stop can be assigned(Contact:Ben Baldwin, 503-962-2140). CONCLUSION: Upon completion of the condition mentioned above,the application will be in substantial compliance with Part C, Specific Site Development Review Approval Criteria, of this section. D. STREET AND UTILITY IMPROVEMENTS STANDARDS Street And Utility Improvements Standards (Section 18.810): Chapter 18.810 provides construction standards for the implementation of public and private facilities and utilities such as streets, sewers, and drainage. The applicable standards are addressed below: Improvements: Section 18.810.030.A.1 states that streets within a development and streets adjacent shill be improved in accordance with the TDC standards. Section 18.810.030.A.2 states that any new street or additional street width planned as a portion of an existing street shall be dedicated and improved in accordance with the TDC. SDR2009-00007 AutoZone Retail Store Decision Page 14 of 21 Minimum Rights-of-Way and Street Widths: Section 18.810.030.E requires a 7-lane Arterial Street to have a 128 foot right-of-way width and 48-foot paved section. Other improvements required may include on-street parking, sidewalks and bikeways, underground utilities, street lighting, storm drainage, and street trees. The right-of-way requirement for Pacific Highway along the project frontage is 52 feet from centerline of the right-of-way. The applicant proposes to dedicate 12 feet of additional right-of-way along the frontage to increase the existing nght-of-way from 40 feet to 52 feet from its centerline. With that dedication, the right- of-way requirement will be met. The applicant proposes to construct a 10 foot wide sidewalk located 6 inches from the new property boundary along the frontage and a 7.5 foot wide planter between the sidewalk and the existing curb. Street trees will be planted where feasible within the planter strip. These improvements are the only street improvements required for this project. Therefore,this standard has been met. Future Street Plan and Extension of Streets: Section 18.810.030.F states that a future street plan shall be filed which shows the pattern of existing and proposed future streets from the boundanes of the proposed land division. This section also slates that where it is necessary to give access or permit a satisfactory future division of adjoining and, streets shall be extended to the boundary lines of the tract to be developed and a barricade shall be constructed at the end of the street. These street stubs to adjoining properties are not considered to be cul-de-sacs since they are intended to continue as through streets at such time as the adjoining property is developed. A barricade shall be constructed at the end of the street by the property owners which shall not be removed until authorized by the City Engineer, the cost of which shall be included in the street construction cost. Temporary hammerhead turnouts or temporary cul-de-sac bulbs shall be constructed for stub streets in excess of 150 feet in length. There are no future streets or extensions of streets through this development. Therefore, this standard does not apply. Street Alignment and Connections: Section 1 .810.030.H.1 states that full street connections with spacing of no more than 530 feet between connections is required except where prevented by bamers such as topography, railroads, freeways, pre-existing developments, lease provisions, easements covenants or other restrictions existing pnor to May 1, 1995 which preclude street connections. A full street connection may also be exempted due to a regulated water feature if regulations would not permit construction. No streets are being constructed or extended.Therefore,this standard does not apply. Section 18.810.030.H.2 states that all local, neighborhood routes and collector streets which abut a development site shall be extended within the site to provide through circulation when not precluded by environmental or topographical constraints, existing development patterns or strict adherence to other standards in this code. A street connection or extension is precluded when it is not possible to redesign, or reconfigure the street pattern to provide required extensions. Land is considered topographically constrained if the slope is greater than 15 r a distance of 250 feet or more. In the case of environmental or topographical constraints,the mere presence of a constraint is not sufficient to show that a street connection is not possible. The applicant must show why the constraint precludes some reasonable street connection. There are no streets that could be extended to provide through circulation. Therefore,this standard does not apply. Grades and Curves: Section 18.810.030.N states that grades shall not exceed ten percent on arterials, 12% on collector streets, or 12% on any other street (except that local or residential access streets may have segments with rades up to 15% for distances of no greater than 250 feet). Centerline radii of curves shall be as determined by the City Engineer. There is no proposal for street construction. Therefore this standard does not apply. Block Designs - Section 18.810.040.A states that the length, width and shape of blocks shall be designed with due regard to providing adequate building sites for the use contemplated consideration of needs for convenient access, circulation, control and safety of street traffic and recognition of limitations and opportunities of topography. SDR2009-00007 AutoZone Retail Store Decision Page 15 of 21 Block Sizes: Section 18.810.040.B.1 states that the perimeter of blocks formed by streets shall not exceed 1,800 feet measured along the right-of-way line except: • Where street location is precluded by natural topography, wetlands or other bodies of water or,pre-existing development or, • For blocks adjacent to arterial streets,limited access highways,major collectors or railroads. • For non-residential blocks in which internal public circulation provides equivalent access. No new streets are proposed. Therefore,this standard does not apply. Section 18.810.040.B.2 also states that bicycle and pedestrian connections on public easements or right-of-ways shall be provided when full street connection is not possible. Spacing between connections shall be no more than 330 feet, except where precluded by environmental or topographical constraints, existing development patterns, or strict adherence to other standards in the code. No new streets are proposed with this development,the bicycle lane is in place, and the sidewalk re-location is part of the plan. Therefore,this standard does not apply. Lots - Size and Shape: Section 18.810.060(A) prohibits lot depth from being more than 2.5 times the average lot width, unless the parcel is less than 1.5 times the minimum lot size of the applicable zoning district. There is no minimum lot size in the GG zoningdistrict. The lot is rectangular in shape approximately 249 feet wide and approximately 128 feet deep. The of size and shape are consistent with the lot size and shape standard. Lot Frontage: Section 18.810.060(B) requires that lots have at least 25 feet of frontage on public or private streets, other than an alley. In the case of a land partition, 18.420.050.A.4.c applies, which requires a parcel to either have a minimum 15-foot frontage or a minimum 15-foot wide recorded access easement. In cases where the lot is for an attached single-family dwelling unit, the frontage shall be at least 15 feet. The subject property has approximately 249 feet of frontage on Pacific Highway,which is consistent with the lot frontage standard. Sidewalks: Section 18.810.070.A requires that sidewalks be constructed to meet City design standards and be located on both sides of arterial, collector and local residential streets. Private streets and industrial streets shall have sidewalks on at least one side. This project proposes to construct a 10 foot wide sidewalk with 7.5 foot wide planter strip. The sidewalk standard has been satisfied. Sanitary Sewers: Sewers Required: Section 18.810.090.A requires that sanitary sewer be installed to serve each new development and to connect developments to existing mains in accordance with the provisions set forth in Design and Construction Standards for Sanitary and Surface Water Management(as adopted by Clean Water Services in 1996 and including any future revisions or amendments) and the adopted policies of the comprehensive plan. Over-sizing: Section 18.810.090.0 states that proposed sewer systems shall include consideration of additional development within the area as projected by the Comprehensive Plan. Sanitary sewer service is available on site and the proposed structure will be served by the existing sewer line. The load on the sewer line from the proposed use be less than the previous use. There is no opportunity for additional development on or around this property. Therefore,this standard does not apply. SDR2009-00007 AutoZone Retail Store Decision Page 16 of 21 Storm Drainage: General Provisions: Section 18.810.100.A requires developers to make adequate provisions for storm water and flood water runoff. Accommodation of Upstream Drainage: Section 18.8 10.100.0 states that a culvert or other drainage facility shall be large enough to accommodate potential runoff from its entire upstream drainage area, whether inside or outside the development. The City Engineer shall approve the necessary size of the facility, based on the provisions of Design and Construction Standards for Sanitary and Surface Water Management (as adopted by Clean Water Services in 2000 and including any future revisions or amendments). The applicant proposes to construct facilities that address detention and water quality requirements for the development. The water quality and detention measures described in the narrative and shown in the plans and calculations are satisfactory; however any comments from ODOT listed in SECTION VIII must be addressed. Effect on Downstream Drainage: Section 18.810.100.D states that where it is anticipated by the City Engineer that the additional runoff resulting from the development will overload an existing drainage facility, the Director and Engineer shall withhold approval of the development until provisions have been made for improvement of the potential condition or until provisions have been made for storage of additional runoff caused by the development in accordance with the Design and Construction Standards for Sanitary and Surface Water Management (as adopted by Clean Water Services in 2000 and including any future revisions or amendments). Storm water detention is required and included in this proposal. Therefore this standard is met. Bikeways and Pedestrian Pathways: Bikeway Extension: Section 18.810.110.A states that developments adjoining proposed bikeways identified on the City's adopted pedestrian/bikeway plan shall include provisions for the future extension of such bikeways through the dedication of easements or right-of-way. No bikeways, bike lanes, or pedestrian pathways are required as part of this project. There is a pedestrian connection from the building to the sidewalk along the frontage and an existing bike lane. Therefore, this standard is met. Minimum Width: Section 18.810.110.0 states that the minimum width for bikeways within the roadway is five feet per bicycle travel lane. Minimum width for two-way bikeways separated from the road is eight feet. Pacific Highway is classified as an arterial, requiring a 6-foot bicycle travel lane, which is currently in place. Therefore,this standard is satisfied. Utilities: Section 18.810.120 states that all utility lines, but not limited to those required for electric communication, lighting and cable television services and related facilities shall be placed underground, except for surface mounted transformers, surface mounted connection boxes and meter cabinets which may be placed above ground, temporary utility service facilities during construction, high capacity electnc lines operating at 50,000 volts or above,and: • The developer shall make all necessary arrangements with the serving utility to provide the underground services; • The C ity reserves the right to approve location of all surface mounted facilities; • All underground utilities, including sanitary sewers and storm drains installed in streets by the developer,shall be constructed prior to the surfacing of the streets; and • Stubs for service connections shall be long enough to avoid disturbing the street improvements when service connections are made. SDR2009-00007 AutoZone Retail Store Decision Page 17 of 21 Exception to Under-Grounding Requirement Section 18.810.120.0 states that a developer shall pay a fee in-lieu of under-grounding costs when the development is proposed to take place on a street where existing utilities which are not underground will serve the development and the approval authority determines that the cost and technical difficulty of under-grounding the utilities outweighs the benefit of under-grounding in conjunction with the development. The determination shall be on a case-by-case basis. The most common, but not the only, such situation is a short frontage development for which under-grounding would result in the placement of additional poles, rather than the removal of above-ground utilities facilities. An applicant for a development which is served by utilities which are not underground and which are located across a public right-of-way from the applicant's property shall pay a fee in-lieu of under-grounding. There are existing overhead utility lines alo the frontage on Pacific Highway.However, overhead power is high voltage at this location and undergroun is not required. The applicant proposes to place the utilities serving their development underground and no ee will be collected for the high-power lines. Therefore,this standard is satisfied. ADDITIONAL CITY AND/OR AGENCY CONCERNS WITH STREET AND UTILITY IMPROVEMENT STANDARDS: Traffic Study: As stated in the applicant's narrative, a Traffic Impact Analysis was not required for this application. The redevelopment and new use will reduce the number of trips generated to and from the subject site. Fire and Life Safety: Tualatin Valley Fire and Rescue reviewed the application and their comments are listed in SECTION VIII and incorporated into the conditions of this decision. Public Water System: The City of Tigard is the service provider for water in this area. The proposed facility will obtain water service from the existing 2 inch service line located at the front of the property. Storm Water Quality: The City has agreed to enforce Surface Water Management SWM) regulations established by Clean Water Services (CWS) Design and Construction Standards((adopted by Resolution and Order No. 00-7) which require the construction of on-site water quality facilities. The facilities shall be designed to remove 65 percent of the phosphorus contained in 100 percent of the storm water runoff generated from newly created impervious surfaces. In addition, a maintenance plan shall be submitted indicating the frequency and method to be used in keeping the facility maintained through the year. This project is required to provide on-site detention and water quality treatment. The project plans includes facilities to address both. Calculations have been submitted to support the facilities incorporated in the project plans.With the submittal of a maintenance plan,these requirements will be met. Grading and Erosion Control: CWS Design and Construction Standards also regulate erosion control to reduce the amount of sediment and other pollutants reaching the public storm and surface water system resulting from development, construction, grading, excavating, clearing, and any other activity which accelerates erosion. Per CWS regulations, the applicant is required-to submit an erosion control plan for City review and approval prior to issuance of City permits. An erosion control plan is required as part of the project submittals prior to issuance of any City permits on the project. This includes submittal of an erosion control_plan for demolition of the existing building unless it is incorporated as part of an erosion control plan for the entire project. This standard can be met conditionally. Address Assignments: The site has an existing address, 13405 SW Pacific Highway,and no changes are proposed. SDR2009-00007 AutoZone Retail Store Decision Page 18 of 21 FINDING: A storm water quality maintenance plan and an erosion control plan were not included in the proposal.These requirements can be met conditionally. CONDITIONS: A water quality facility maintenance plan shall be submitted to the City as part the required Public Facility Improvement permit application. An erosion control plan is required as part of the application for a demolition permit for the existing building. This plan can also reflect erosion control measures for site work and new construction. CONCLUSION: Upon completion of the two conditions mentioned above the application will be in substantial compliance with Part D,Street and Utility Standards, of this section. E. IMPACT STUDY Section 18.360.090 states, "The Director shall make a finding with respect to each of the following criteria when approving,approving with conditions or denying an application:" Section 18.390.040 states that the applicant shall provide an impact study to quantify the effect of development on public facilities and services. For each public facility system and type of impact, the study shall propose improvements necessary to meet City standard, and to minimize the impact of the development on the public at large, public facilities systems, and affected private property users. In situations where the Community Development Code requires the dedication of real property interests, the applicant shall either specifically concur with a requirement for public right-of-way dedication, or provide evidence that supports that the real property dedication is not roughly proportional to the projected impacts of the development. Section 18.390.040 states that when a condition of approval requires the transfer to the public of an interest in real property, the approval authority shall adopt findings which support the conclusion that the interest in real property to be transferred is roughly proportional to the impact the proposed development will have on the public. A project impact analysis was prepared by HDJ Design Group and submitted as part of the proposal narrative stating the following: Impacts to the City's transportation system will be minimal as the proposed use will result in a reduction in overall transportation impacts.There are no changes proposed to the existing bikeway system. This application has provided updated plans for storm water collection conveyance, treatment and detention. No additional mitigation measures are proposed with this development relating to the site's drainage system. These plans have been submitted to ODOT for review and the resulting comments are incorporated into the conditions of this decision. There are no impacts to the city's parks facilities anticipated with this application. This proposal will utilize the existing water service lateral and meter, and will require significantly less water than the previous use. The site is connected to existing sanitary sewer service with a 6-inch sewer lateral which will serve the new building. The proposed use willrequire less sanitary service that the previous tenant. The proposal is for an auto parts retail business, with all business related activities occurring within the building. Construction noise will be limited to the City of Tigard guidelines for construction hours. The applicant concurs with and proposes the dedication of 12 feet of property to the right-of-way along the frontage of Pacific Highway. FINDING: The project proposal adequately addresses the impact study standards. CONCLUSION: The application is in compliance with Part E,Impact Study,of this section. SDR2009-00007 AutoZone Retail Store Decision Page 19 of 21 SECTION VII. OTHER STAFF COMMENTS City of Tigard Arborist: The City Arborist has reviewed the proposal and his comments and conditions are incorporated into this decision in SECTION II. City of Tigard Building Division, Police Department, and Public Works: These City Offices were provided the proposal documents and had no comments or conditions regarding this land use decision. City of Tigard Development Engineer. The Development En sneer reviewed the proposal and his comments and conditions are incorporated into this decision in SE HON II and SECTION VI. SECTION VIII. AGENCY COMMENTS Clean Water Services: Clean Water Services was provided a copy of the application documents and plans and has not responded. Applicable issues have been reviewed- by the City Development Engineer and conditions will be listed in SECTION II of this decision. Tualatin Valley Fire and Rescue: TVF&R has reviewed the proposal and offered the following comments in a letter dated April 13,2010: Two fire hydrants are required for this project. Both fire hydrants shown on the submitted drawings must be capable of supplying the required fire flow. The applicant must submit fire flow demand calculations and flow test the hydrant nearest the project site. The required fire flow for the building shall not exceed minute gallons per mute (GPM) or the available GPM in the water delivery system at whichever is less as calculated using IFC Appendix B. A worksheet is available from the -ire Marshal's Ofice. Approved fire apparatus access roadways and fire fighting water supplies shall be installed and operational prior to any combustible construction or storage of combustible materials on the site. A Knox Box for access is required for this building. Contact the Fire Marshal's Office for an order form and instructions regarding installation and placement. Oregon Department of Transportation: ODOT has reviewed the proposal and provided the following comments bye-mail on April 2,2010: Plan sheet C3.0 shall indicate direction of flow for the water detention system. The storm water control vault shown on Sheet C3.0 must be re-located onto private property from its current location in the planter strip. The new parking lot storm drain lines must be re-located to the revised water control vault location. Indicate vision clearance lines at both approaches on plan sheets L1.0 and/or L2.0 that indicate no trees will restrict the vision clearance area. On plan sheet L2.0 in the text for"Root Barriers",delete "with less than 8'width". Tri-Met: Tri-Met has reviewed the proposal plans and narrative and provided the following comments by e- mail March 30,2010: Add a 10 foot concrete pad to serve the front door of the bus and use the pad shown in the plans to serve the rear door of the bus. Provide 10 feet of landscaped area with no trees between the pads. Street trees can be placed immediately north and south of the 30 foot bus stop. The south end of the 30 foot bus stop is to be located approximately 55 feet north of the crosswalk. The bus stop sign is to be installed at the south edge of the bus stop,approximately 77 feet from its current location. The pads can be designed to City of Tigard sidewalk standards and can accommodate a 2% cross slope. SDR2009-00007 AutoZone Retail Store Decision Page 20 of 21 The applicant shall contact Tri-Met two weeks prior to work in the right-of-way to allow for temporary location of the bus stop (Contact:Ben Baldwin503-962-2140) Clean Water Services: CWS was provided the proposal documents and did not comment. Their standards will be addressed in the PFI application and erosion control plan. SECTION IX. PROCEDURE AND APPEAL INFORMATION Notice: Notice was posted at City Hall and mailed to: X The applicant and owners X Owner of record within the required distance X Affected government agencies Final Decision: THIS DECISION IS FINAL ON MAY 3,2010 AND BECOMES EFFECTIVE ON MAY 18,2010 UNLESS AN APPEAL IS FILED. Appeal The decision of the Director (Type II Procedure) or Review Authority (Type II Administrative Appeal or Type III Procedure) is final for purposes of appeal on the date that it is mailed. Any party with standing as provided in Section 18.390.040.G.1. may appeal this decision in accordance with Section 18.390.040.G.2. of the Tigard Community Development Code which provides that a written appeal together with the required fee shall be filed with the Director within ten (10)business days of the date the notice of the decision was mailed. The appeal fee schedule and forms are available from the Planning Division of Tigard City Hall, 13125 SW Hall B oulevard,Tigard,Oregon 97223. Unless the applicant is the appellant,the hearing on an appeal from the Director's Decision shall be confined to the specific issues identified in the written comments submitted by the parties during the comment period. Additional evidence concerning issues properly raised in the Notice of Appeal may be submitted by any party during the appeal hearing,subject to any additional rules of procedure that maybe adopted from time to time by the appellate body. THE DEADLINE FOR FILING AN APPEAL IS AT 5:00 PM ON MAY 17,2010. estions: If you have any questions, please call the City of Tigard Planning Division, Tigard City Hall, 13125 SW Hall Boulevard,Tigard, Oregon at(503) 639-4171. PREPARED BY: Dane Watkins DA 1✓ Assistant-Planner c/3ii2 APPRO D BY: Ronald B.Bunch ATE Director of Community Development SDR2009-00007 AutoZone Retail Store Decision Page 21 of 21 iiii 16.. 4 rh��-s pt -- i r 44, •`` , / /44/ VICINITY MAP Charles SDR2009-00007 �� F.Tigard igard IES E 4ementa; I ,_..fi ., , AUTOZONE STORE DERRY D-ll CI 2� IS 'rP • N / ST \ 7/ 4 111100.ii! r vG S - SubjJ Subject Site 1111 NARK ST /f "OP ili r �; �t, rrif I •.j. '• r I� 94Yi.�r O v.- 471 IIII 4 e"°111 $ $1k,o 'C''. _____ ill. • �Qi i Scr� .Pita ,. r --r•eIRFIat7•E // . Ifr� / j� `, Information on this map is for general location j f only and should be verified with the Development ri /t f`F-A�� Services Division. 4/////:7 Scale 1.4,000-t In=333 ft j j ``� Map punted at 09:56 AM on 12-Mar-1 U 410111111 f j C // ,� DATA IS DERIVED FROM MULTIPLE SOURCES THE CITY OF TIGARD ((� MAKES NO WARRANTY,REPRESENTATION OR GUARANTEE AS TO THE j// \� CONTENT ACCURACY TIMELINESS OR COMPLETENESS OF ANY OF THE DATA PROVIDED HEREIN THE CITY a TpARD SHALL ASSUME NO /j � 1 UABILRY FOR ANY ERRORS.OMISSIONS.Oft INACCURACIES IN THE j -t`, INFORMATION PROVIDED REGARDLESS OF HON CAUSED. j!/ cny of Igard Feet prit` ill" r DD 13125 SW Hall Blvd 0 50p ?iGA MgPS Tigard,03639-017123 ;� , 14 www.tigardor.gov TIGARD AwozoE SL- --10 RE loo 3756 Located In The SW Y.,Sec.2,T2S.R1W,W.M. CITY OF TIGARD _ _ Approved •I \ ITE ttm "!,,ndirlonallyApproved I X OM 1 F sr only the work as described in: \ 1-'19M1-1 NO. b/Z ,2af—/100.0 7 '�� ----- �`\\\ \ \\\ ;> �'1€ \`„- a �eF L.ettr3r to: Follow I 1�� VICINITY MAP Attach I ,f Q o cb.4d! s: /3yDs SAr/tic li� !'_' _ ��x �; - ._ [date: 5 euano r ---� --��,� 4*Z v/' \`y f ' 'FEW/ '+l ' /�i—' �'W f I SITE INFORMATION: `Lbs ' p i l^ _' I I as . PROPOSED BULDING AREA e,T88SF 20% _I PROPOSED SIDEWALAARE 213223SF 81% PROPOSED LANDSCAPE AREA 1338 SF S%4% PROPOSEDU LANDSCAPE AREA 8,0825E 15% N. i*II I I TOTAL SITE AREA 33,5015F M ■ , I TOTAL PARKING 32 SPACES R fIC SPACES) PROPOSED The peaingloteom.�n,23%a o.n.d.re. AUTOZONE BUILDING •au O "' '- I' STANDARDS: REO. PROPOSED �I 6,786 Square Feet il� Wm Lot Size- None G.n1«raa • \\ °l I Min.Lot wwn- soteet 249 Z 1 FmK Setback- Ofeet 52' \\ bawl STORAGE'\ ;ue ■11 III Side Setback- OMt R' \ \ _\ I SUS! Rev Setback- OMt 1' \ \k,% \ ,%' - ■li ... I Mxe;um Lot Coverage• 85% 95% W \ 1r Maximum BUloing Height- OS feet 21 het —I % ➢tl�j/ I -•�� ■��II - _ t l� MI mL.M.uP.. 15% 15% ' Tae 50 ENCLOSURE: \\ �" l°1 �� I The hash enclosure will be constructed of moan nR•block retching the O \\ I b ..%. I I bmlano,sreetebambl. \ Buanno i g 4 ;,,c1--- I r i IIIIII o mo - I I !W it mi\'�� a� ��t1A _ O 4. _ 5W PACIFIC HIGHWAY _�__ _ / �3`O - \\" -�—(PUBLIC ,4SI`FIALTa Scale 1"=20' g■ I_ )\100.0011 4 0-0-0 U O o OVA SCALE FES OS MD SMEET SP1.0 • Bar-Am,LLC SDR2009-00007 Isaac Baruch AUTOZONE STORE 1416 3rd Avenue EXHIB1T� Seattle,WA 98101 AutoZone-Store Development Department 8320,Mitch Bramlitt 123 S.Front Street Memphis,TN 3 8103 BAR-AM,LLC BY GODFATHER'S PIZZA 1416 THIRD AVE SEATTLE,WA 98101 Steven Schalk Access Management &Engineering Coordinator ODOT District 2A 6000 SW Raab Road Portland, OR 97221 Ben Baldwin,Project Planner TM Transit Development 710 NE Holladay Street Portland OR 97232 ■ AFFIDAVIT OF MAILING .14 . . GARB I,Patricia L. Lunsford,being first dulysworn/affirm,on oath depose and say that I am a Planning Assistant for the City of Tigard, Washington County,Oregon and that I served the following: ;Check,cy.we Box(s)&kn.} © NOTICE OF DEQSION FOR SDR2009-00007/AUTOZONE RETAIL STORE (File No./Naar Reference) El AMENDED NOTICE N City of Tigard Planning Director A copy of the said notice being hereto attached,marked Exhibit"A",and by reference made a part hereof,was mailed to each named person(s) at the address(s) shown on the attached list(s),marked Exhibit"B",and by reference made a part hereof,on May 3,2010,and deposited in the Cu tates Mail on May3,2010,postage prepaid. OP 2itie:t.... ii 2 fiL (Person that Pr pare. e.ce) STATE OF OREGON County of Washington ss. City of Tigard 8 '� Subscribed and sworn/affirmed before me on the day of /U,-1 ,2010. � OFFICIAL SEAL �j ( b:...' SHIRLEY L TREAT -' NOTARY MMI COMMISSION -OREGON •t COMMISSION NO.416777 , 1 MY COMMISSION EXPIRES APRIL 25,2011 ', -�� - -- — . NO ARY PUB C OF OREGON My Commission Expires: 4141J EXHIBIT A NOTICE OF TYPE II DECISION Erl! SITE DEVELOPMENT REVIEW(SDR) 2009-00007 AUTOZONE RETAIL STORE 120 DAYS = 07/08/2010 SECTION I. APPLICATION SUMMARY FILE NAME: AUTOZONE RETAIL STORE CASE NO.: Site Development Review(SDR) SDR2009-00007 PROPOSAL: The applicant is requesting Site Development Review approval for a 6,800 square foot retail store with associated parking and site improvements on an approximately 36,590 square foot (0.84-acre) site on Pacific Highway in place of a 3,500 square foot restaurant. APPLICANT: AutoZone-Department 8320 OWNER Bar-Am,LLC Attn: Mitch Bramlitt Attn: Isaac Baruch 123 S. Front Street 1416 3r' Avenue Memphis,TN 38103 Seattle,WA 98101 LOCATION: 13405 SW Pacific Highway,Washington County Tax Map 2S 102CB, Tax Lot 01802. ZONE: GG: General Commercial. The GG zoning district is designed to accommodate a full range of retail, office and civic uses with a City-wide and even regional trade area. Except where non-conforming, residential uses are limited to single-family residences which are located on the same site as a permitted use. A wide range of uses, including but not limited to adult entertainment, automotive equipment repair and storage, mini-warehouses, utilities, heliports, medical centers, major event entertainment, and gasoline stations, are permitted conditionally. APPLICABLE REVIEW Community Development Code Chapters 18.360, 18.390, 18.520, 18.705, 18.725, 18.745, CRITERIA: 18.755, 18.765, 18.780, 18.790, 18.795 and 18.810. SECTION II. DECISION Notice is hereby given that the City of Tigard Community Development Director's designee has APPROVED the above request. The findings and conclusions on which the decision is based are noted in the full decision, available at City Hall. THIS APPROVAL SHALL BE VALID FOR 18 MONTHS FROM THE EFFECTIVE DATE OF THIS DECISION. All documents and applicable criteria in the above-noted file are available for inspection at no cost or copies can be obtained for twenty-five cents (25 ) per page,or the current rate charged for copies at the time of the request. SECTION III. PROCEDURE AND APPEAL INFORMATION Notice: Notice mailed to: X The applicant and owners X Owner of record within the required distance X Affected government agencies Final Decision: THIS DECISION IS FINAL ON MAY 3, 2010 AND BECOMES EFFECTIVE ON MAY 18, 2010 UNLESS AN APPEAL IS FILED. A peal: The Director's Decision is final on the date that it is mailed. All persons entitled to notice or who are otherwise adversely affected or aggrieved by the decision as provided in Section 18.390.040.G.1 may appeal this decision in accordance with Section 18.390.040.G.2 of the Tigard Community Development Code which provides that a written appeal together with the required fee shall be filed with the Director within ten (10) business days of the date the Notice of Decision was mailed. The appeal fee schedule and forms are available from the Planning Division of Tigard City Hall, 13125 SW Hall Boulevard,Tigard, Oregon 97223. Unless the applicant is the appellant, the hearing on an appeal from the Director's Decision shall be confined to the specific issues identified in the written comments submitted by the parties during the comment period. Additional evidence concerning issues properly raised in the Notice of Appeal may be submitted by any party during the appeal hearing, subject to any additional rules of procedure that maybe adopted from time to time by the appellate body. THE DEADLINE FOR FILING AN APPEAL IS 5:00 PM ON MAY 17, 2010. Questions: For further information please contact the Planning Division Staff Planner, Darrel "Hap" Watkins at (503) 718-2440, Tigard City Hall, 13125 SW Hall Boulevard, Tigard, Oregon 97223. d■`V'111 V44 ..g a E... ® AUTOZONE STORE lilitli CP 1 ! ��gr::L IIIIII■■ 1C / Subject Site MG PAW(5T m nut v. die 40 04,-..rir, I 0 1 il /Alp, , ,i.,,,r,,,,,,,,,,,,.... i, . ........,„00. ...... • ._ ,,, .,,,,„,„„,„ ,,,_ ,i ■ P cE 10/' ,� �:pP, +4�rr.�•Zm w.�xi..fir I 0 ,,,,Iir. ,,-4, ,,, .... ,,,,,„.......„.., .. ...... ..yalpv4,4 kik*, 0- 1■■111 di • OAPS AftWF 11 AUTOZONE STORE KO. 3750 ?K CITY OF TIGARD Aoproren i ; }!t ..ndhto mry Approved i x. \ 11111 r,r only ttlu work p o..erlbed In: \� /\ \ -=L Letter t NU.�oilow 13—A0007 n Att.0 ; , o _,-.+. .-. Al_ „ W A6�,te: /3✓OC Sri die w�.. / -o , ., t�■. O �e, i 0..ar.,os............... ....: : AL.o.1 I fn •■ititit1.tt..■■■■■■■■•_.• — Iii '—� 0 0 0 0 • v, 0 0 0 .la ,;€r $p1-o • 13500 PACIFIC CORP DURDEL,CHRISTOPHER C&MARGO L EXHIBIT BY CAPOZZOLI ADVISORY FOR 10425 SW PARK ST PENSIONS INC TIGARD,OR 97223 21500 HAGGERTY ROAD,SUITE 100 NORTHVILLE,MI 48167 2S102CB07500 2S102CB07300 13500 PACIFIC CORP FERNANDO,ANIL NIHAL KANWAR& BY CAPOZZOLI ADVISORY FERNANDO,ANNE ELIZABETH PENSIONS,INC 18240 MEADOWLARK LN 21500 HAGGERTY ROAD,SUITE 100 LAKE OSWEGO,OR 97034 NORTHVILLE,MI 48167 2S102CB01802 2S102CB03500 BAR-AM,LLC GOOD SHEPHERD LUTHERAN HOME OF T BY GODFATHER'S PIZZA 831 SW 17TH AVE 1416 THIRD AVE PORTLAND,OR 97205 SEATTLE WA,98 2S102CB05400 2S102CB01200 BIDDLE,EDWARD H REV LIV TRUST HESS,DAVID A&GAIL K BY MARJORIE J IRVINE& 13170 SW GRANT AVE LAURIE J BIDDLE TRS TIGARD,OR 97223 PO BOX 517 GATES,OR 97346 2S103DA05900 2S103DA06000 BISHOP,WILBUR A AND MARTHA E HOLCOMBE,GERALD A& PO BOX 23832 BELINDA M TIGARD,OR 97281 13485 SW WATKINS ST TIGARD,OR 97223 2S102CB02100 2S102CB01600 CACH FAMILY SMALL PROPERTIES LLC HOLCOMBE,RYAN&KATIE BY REGENCY MANAGEMENT INC 10395 SW PARK ST 12488 SW AUTUMNVIEW ST TIGARD,OR 97223 TIGARD,OR 97224 2S103DD00200 2S102CC00700 CEARLEY,DARRELL A& HORTON,DENNIS M&ELISABETH A ANGELA M 19220 VIEW DR 13530 SW WATKINS AVE WEST LINN,OR 97068 TIGARD,OR 97223 2S102CB00302 2S102CB01700 CJ GLOBAL LLC KIMMEL,KRISTA L PO BOX 5668 10365 SW PARK ST ALOHA,OR 97006 TIGARD,OR 97223 2S102CC09000 2S102CC01000 DDHK VENTURES LLC KUBIN CARON 12604 SW 60TH CT BY NORRIS&STEVENS PORTLAND,OR 97219 621 SW MORRISON ST#800 PORTLAND,OR 97205 2 '2CC09 90 2S102CB05500 DDH' - ■ URES LLC MARGUTH,VAL M TR& 1261 60TH CT ELIZABETH TR •RTLAND,OR 97219 12416 NW LILYWOOD DR PORTLAND,OR 97229 • 2S102CC00102 2S102CB01100 • MCDONALD,JOE D O'CONNOR,S CASEY 13555 SW CRESMER DR 13150 SW GRANT AVE TIGARD,OR 97223 TIGARD,OR 97223 2S102CB07100 2S102CC00311 MEDINA,LEE D&DEBRA OLSON,DEANNA KAY& 10453 SW PARK ST BANGAY,PETER JR TIGARD,OR 97223 10210 SW 77TH AVE TIGARD,OR 97223 2S102CB06900 2S103DD00401 MISKA,EDWARD P& OWENS,JOHN W&DEBORAH A MISKA,PHYLLIS MAE& 13525 SW WATKINS GADBAUGH,WAYNE R TIGARD,OR 97223 745 THIRD ST LAKE OSWEGO,OR 97034 2S103DA04701 2S102CB02300 MOAR, PATRICIA C TRUSTEE PACIFIC PROPERTIES 4114 SW FLOWER ST BY MARTIN JOHNSON PORTLAND,OR 97221 13200 SW PACIFIC HWY TIGARD,OR 97223 10203074a• 2S102CB06700 MO•' P• -ICIA C TRUSTEE PACIFIC PROPERTIES GENERAL 411• Ty OWER ST PARTNERSHIP •RTLAND, +R 97221 13200 SW PACIFIC HWY TIGARD,OR 97223 '103DA04702 2S103DA06100 M ,P CIA C TRUSTEE PAPEN,CINDY 4114 FLOWER ST 13450 SW WATKINS ST TLAN OR 97221 TIGARD,OR 97223 2S102CB07600 2S103DA05000 MORTENSEN,TIM&SHANNON PATINO,CARLOS SR&BLANCA 13155 SW GRANT AVE 10605 SW COOK LN TIGARD,OR 97223 TIGARD,OR 97223 2S102CC00310 2S102CB02000 MUNCH,BRIAN A PETTIJOHN,PAUL 13495 SW CRESMER DR 25710 E BRIGHT AVE TIGARD,OR 97223 WELCHES,OR 97067 2S103DA04900 2S102C801800 MURFINSIMMONS,MATTHEW T& PUBLIC STORAGE MICAHLE INSTITUTIONAL FUND 13365 SW WATKINS DEPT PT-OR26410 TIGARD,OR 97223 PO BOX 25025 GLENDALE,CA 91201 2S103DA00600 2S103DA04600 NOONAN,DAVID W&YUKO PUGSLEY,CLAYTON A& 13210 SW WATKINS AVE FREEMAN-PUGSLEY,CAMIE TIGARD,OR 97223 10570 SW PARK ST TIGARD,OR 97223 • 25103DD00300 2S102CB01804 RAMIREZ,KEVIN P&LEEANNE M WEBER COASTAL BELLS LIMITED 13570 SW WATKINS AVE WEBER,EDUARD TIGARD,OR 97223 840 CONGER ST EUGENE,OR 97402 2S102CB07700 2S102CB01901 RUTHERFORD,SHERYL L WEBER COASTAL BELLS LTD PTNRSHP 13157 SW GRANT AVE PO BOX 23408 TIGARD,OR 97223 EUGENE,OR 97402 2S102CC00309 SHOVE,DONALD D SHIRLEY G 13485 SW CRESMER DR TIGARD,OR 97223 2S103DA06200 SNELL,LARRY D& DOYLE-SNELL,MAUREEN M 2218 E EVERGREEN ST MESA,AZ 85213 2S102CB06801 SOLIS,EDGAR TRUSTEE PO BOX 231193 TIGARD,OR 97281 2S102CB07200 SUBRAMANIAN,LAXMANPRAKASH& ADINARAYANAN,SASIKALA 10441 SW PARK ST TIGARD,OR 97223 2S103DA04700 URL,JOY B 13370 SW WATKINS TIGARD,OR 97223 S103DA04 0 U J 13 W WATKINS GARD, R 97223 2S103DD00100 VITIRITTI,PIETRO&PASQUALINA TRUSTEES 14115 SW 157TH TIGARD,OR 97224 2S102C805300 W-2 PROPERTIES LLC 12415 SW 122ND AVE TIGARD,OR 97223 . Gretchen Buehner 13249 SW 136th Place Tigard, OR 97224 Don & Dorothy Erdt 13760 SW 121st Avenue Tigard, OR 97223 Ellen Beilstein 14630 SW 139th Avenue Tigard, OR 97224 Todd Harding and Blake Hering Jr. Norris Beggs & Simpson 121 SW Morrison, Suite 200 Portland, OR 97204 Vanessa Foster 13085 SW Howard Drive Tigard, OR 97223 Susan Beilke 11755 SW 114th Place Tigard, OR 97223 CPO 4B 16200 SW Pacific Highway, Suite H242 Tigard, OR 97224 Patricia Keerins 12195 SW 121st Avenue Tigard, OR 97223 John Frewing 7110 SW Lola Lane Tigard, OR 97223 CITY OF TIGARD - CENTRAL INTERESTED PARTIES (i:\curpin\setup\labels\CIT Central.doc) UPDATED: 18-Sep-09 Josh Thomas ` .san Be., e 10395 SW Bonanza 117N:4•W 114th Place Tigard, OR 97224 'gad, •" 97223 -tchen Bu: ner David Walsh 132, ' . 1 136th Place 10236 SW Stuart Court Ts.rd, O' 97224 Tigard, OR 97223 Paul Owen odd Harding a • Blake Hering Jr. 10335 SW Highland Drive No Be•• : Simpson Tigard, OR 97224 121 orrison, Suite 200 P: land, 0 97204 Tim Esau PO Box 230695 Tigard, OR 97281 .'0 4B 1620. W Pacific Highway, Suite H242 •gard, O' 97224 Ross Sundberg 16382 SW 104th Avenue Tigard, OR 97224 Brian Wegener 9830 SW Kimberly Drive Tigard, OR 97224 Joseph Dyar 10285 SW Highland Drive Tigard, OR 97224-4668 Rex Caffall 13205 SW Village Glenn Tigard, OR 97223 •• Fr- g 71 I Lola Lane gard, 0' •7223 CITY OF TIGARD - SOUTH INTERESTED PARTIES kw. I of 11 Ii:lcuroln\setuollabels\CIT South.docl UPDATED: 16-Dec-08 11, 19 AFFIDAVIT OF POSTING NOTICE OF A LAND USE PROPOSAL TIGARD IMPORTANT NOTICE: THIS AFFIDAVIT MUST BE ACCOMPANIED BY A COPY OF THE NOTICE THAT WAS POSTED ON THE SITE. In the Matter of the Proposed Land Use Applications for Land Use File Nos.: SDR2009-00007 Land Use File Name: AUTOZONE RETAIL STORE I, Hap Watkins, Assistant Planner for the City of Tigard, do affirm that I posted notice of the land use proposal affecting the land loc/art ddyatt (state the a.pr. • ate.to tion(s F no address(s) and/or tax lot(s) currently registered) / I $ �� G /I . -� and did personally post notice of the proposed land use application(s)by means of weatherproof posting in the general vicinity of the affected territory, a copy of aid notice being hereto attached and by reference made a part hereof, on the / )thy of Maral .2010. iAiiVL4li6 Signature of 'erson ' Jr 'erformed Posting h:\login\patty\masters\af5davit of posting for applicant to post public heatmg.doc -AUTOZONE RETAIL STORE- SITE DEVELOPMENT REVIEW (SDR) 2009-00007 REQUEST: The applicant is proposing to demolish an existing building and construct a 6,800 square foot auto-related retail business on a .84-acre parcel. Site improvements will include a new building, 32 parking spaces and associated landscaping. A new sidewalk will be constructed along the front of the lot. Access ways will not be affected. LOCATION: 13405 SW Pacific Highway; Washington County Tax Map 2S102ci3, Tax Lot 01802. ZONE: C-G: General Commercial District. The C-G zoning district is designed to accommodate a full range of retail, office and civic uses with a City-wide and even regional trade area. Except where nonconforming, residential uses are limited to single-family residences which are located on the same site as a permitted use. A wide range of uses, including but not limited to adult entertainment, automotive equipment repair and storage, mini-warehouses, utilities, heliports, medical centers, major event entertainment, and gasoline stations, are permitted conditionally. APPLICABT E REVIEW CRITERIA: Community Development Code Chapters 18.360, 18.3A, 18.520, 18.705, 18.745, 18.755, 18.765, 18.795 and 18.810. Further information may be obtained from the Planning Division (staff contact: Hap Watkins, Assistant Planner) at 13125 SW Hall Blvd., Tigard, Oregon 97223, or by calling 503- 639-4171 or by email to hap @tigard-or.gov. A copy of the application and all documents and evidence submitted by or on behalf of the applicant and the applicable criteria are available for inspection at no cost and copies for all items can also be provided at a reasonable cost. A III a iiii rAiiiiiialda Area Notified (500 Ft) 71-a ■ PJ IIIIIIIII 111111 HDJ Design Group Q DERRY DELL CT Ea "KV 4So:G sr 1111 1 1 14, 2S102CB 1802 5 IN a 6111MINOI•■■A e -.MA • 1W. * ' . ,' Ilk PARK ST '� ` �■ ■in - � . .,4.` `�, . ;;❖;•; Subject Site 11111111k) 1 �� i I COOK LN ,:44:4.0 •i ♦ . mmimmillill ! '11 ' "iviv; \ .- ■ 111Limille I Ill • N. • `. R%,D. for 3 months om the date printed valid ` `"1\ `` ``\ ♦ this map. p FAIRHAVEN ST \\` , � � owl, mlii el 1/4,., CEP � . Map Printed:09-Mar-10 1111 „rollr, ti WIPP FAIRHAVEN WAY ` , Information on ttss map is for general bcatbn Aak \ .r\� . only and should be verified with the Development 'I, Services Dision. DAIS N IS SOURCES.R TIECRYOF TI T Ti MAKES N,A CU RA Y T MEPRESS OR11ON.OE EKES NOFANY TF THE D PROVIDED HERnEW ETHE CCITYOFC�TIGARE D SSHALL�ASSl1MENO\\ so p5N LBABLRY FOR ANY ERRORS,OMISSIONS,OR INACCURACIES IN THE INFORMATION PRONGED REGARDLESS OF HOW CAUSED. "1 COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT Ir HILLVIEW ST •• -� . _ 13125SWH Revd C Tigard,OR 97223 0 670 r 503 639-4171 N www.Ggardor.gev I• s 2S102CC00500 2S102CB01500 13500 PACIFIC CORP DURDEL,CHRISTOPHER C&MARGO L BY CAPOZZOLI ADVISORY FOR 10425 SW PARK ST PENSIONS INC TIGARD,OR 97223 21500 HAGGERTY ROAD,SUITE 100 NORTHVILLE,MI 48167 2S102CB07500 2S102CB07300 13500 PACIFIC CORP FERNANDO,ANIL NIHAL KANWAR& BY CAPOZZOLI ADVISORY FERNANDO,ANNE ELIZABETH PENSIONS, INC 18240 MEADOWLARK LN 21500 HAGGERTY ROAD,SUITE 100 LAKE OSWEGO,OR 97034 NORTHVILLE,MI 48167 2S102C801802 2S102CB03500 BAR-AM,LLC GOOD SHEPHERD LUTHERAN HOME OF T BY GODFATHER'S PIZZA 831 SW 17TH AVE 1416 THIRD AVE PORTLAND,OR 97205 SEATTLE WA,98 2S102CB05400 2S102CB01200 BIDDLE,EDWARD H REV LIV TRUST HESS,DAVID A&GAIL K BY MARJORIE J IRVINE& 13170 SW GRANT AVE LAURIE J BIDDLE TRS TIGARD,OR 97223 PO BOX 517 GATES,OR 97346 2S103DA05900 2S103DA06000 BISHOP,WILBUR A AND MARTHA E HOLCOMBE,GERALD A& PO BOX 23832 BELINDA M TIGARD,OR 97281 13485 SW WATKINS ST TIGARD,OR 97223 2S102CB02100 2S102C801600 CACH FAMILY SMALL PROPERTIES LLC HOLCOMBE,RYAN&KATIE BY REGENCY MANAGEMENT INC 10395 SW PARK ST 12488 SW AUTUMNVIEW ST TIGARD,OR 97223 TIGARD,OR 97224 2S103DD00200 2S102CC00700 CEARLEY,DARRELL A& HORTON,DENNIS M&ELISABETH A ANGELA M 19220 VIEW DR 13530 SW WATKINS AVE WEST LINN,OR 97068 TIGARD,OR 97223 2S102CB00302 2S102CB01700 CJ GLOBAL LLC KIMMEL,KRISTA L PO BOX 5668 10365 SW PARK ST ALOHA,OR 97006 TIGARD,OR 97223 2S102CC09000 2S102CC01000 DOHK VENTURES LLC KUBIN CARON 12604 SW 60TH CT BY NORRIS&STEVENS PORTLAND,OR 97219 621 SW MORRISON ST#800 PORTLAND,OR 97205 2 •2CC09 10 2S102CB05500 DDH' URES LLC MARGUTH,VAL M TR& 1261 .0TH CT ELIZABETH TR •RTLAND,OR 97219 12416 NW LILYWOOD DR PORTLAND,OR 97229 2S102CC00102 2S102CB01100 MCDONALD,JOE D O'CONNOR,S CASEY 13555 SW CRESMER DR 13150 SW GRANT AVE TIGARD,OR 97223 TIGARD,OR 97223 2S102CB07100 2S102CC00311 MEDINA,LEE D&DEBRA OLSON,DEANNA KAY& 10453 SW PARK ST BANGAY,PETER JR TIGARD,OR 97223 10210 SW 77TH AVE TIGARD,OR 97223 2S102CB06900 2S103DD00401 MISKA,EDWARD P& OWENS,JOHN W&DEBORAH A MISKA,PHYLLIS MAE& 13525 SW WATKINS GADBAUGH,WAYNE R TIGARD,OR 97223 745 THIRD ST LAKE OSWEGO,OR 97034 2S103DA04701 2S102CB02300 MOAR,PATRICIA C TRUSTEE PACIFIC PROPERTIES 4114 SW FLOWER ST BY MARTIN JOHNSON PORTLAND,OR 97221 13200 SW PACIFIC HWY TIGARD,OR 97223 102CB074S• 2S102CB06700 MO, P• -ICIA C TRUSTEE PACIFIC PROPERTIES GENERAL 411• f■ OWER ST PARTNERSHIP •RTLAND, •R 97221 13200 SW PACIFIC HWY TIGARD,OR 97223 103DA0470 2S103DA06100 M ,P CIA C TRUSTEE PAPEN,CINDY 4114 LOWER ST 13450 SW WATKINS ST TLAN OR 97221 TIGARD,OR 97223 2S102CB07600 2S103DA05000 MORTENSEN,TIM&SHANNON PATINO,CARLOS SR&BLANCA 13155 SW GRANT AVE 10605 SW COOK LN TIGARD,OR 97223 TIGARD,OR 97223 2S102CC00310 2S102CB02000 MUNCH,BRIAN A PETTIJOHN,PAUL 13495 SW CRESMER DR 25710 E BRIGHT AVE TIGARD,OR 97223 WELCHES,OR 97067 2S103DA04900 2S102CB01800 MURFINSIMMONS,MATTHEW T& PUBLIC STORAGE MICAHLE INSTITUTIONAL FUND 13365 SW WATKINS DEPT PT-OR26410 TIGARD,OR 97223 PO BOX 25025 GLENDALE,CA 91201 2S103DA00600 2S103DA04600 NOONAN,DAVID W&YUKO PUGSLEY,CLAYTON A& 13210 SW WATKINS AVE FREEMAN-PUGSLEY,CAMIE TIGARD,OR 97223 10570 SW PARK ST TIGARD,OR 97223 2S103DD00300 2S102CB01804 RAMIREZ,KEVIN P&LEEANNE M WEBER COASTAL BELLS LIMITED 13570 SW WATKINS AVE WEBER,EDUARD TIGARD,OR 97223 840 CONGER ST EUGENE,OR 97402 2S102CB07700 2S102CB01901 RUTHERFORD,SHERYL L WEBER COASTAL BELLS LTD PTNRSHP 13157 SW GRANT AVE PO BOX 23408 TIGARD,OR 97223 EUGENE,OR 97402 2S102CC00309 SHOVE,DONALD D SHIRLEY G 13485 SW CRESMER DR TIGARD,OR 97223 2S103DA06200 SNELL,LARRY D& DOYLE-SNELL,MAUREEN M 2218 E EVERGREEN ST MESA,AZ 85213 2S102CB06801 SOLIS,EDGAR TRUSTEE PO BOX 231193 TIGARD,OR 97281 2S 102CB07200 SUBRAMANIAN,LAXMANPRAKASH& ADINARAYANAN,SASIKALA 10441 SW PARK ST TIGARD,OR 97223 2S103DA04700 URL,JOY B 13370 SW WATKINS TIGARD,OR 97223 S103DA04 0 U JO 13 W WATKINS GARD, R 97223 2S103DD00100 VITIRITTI,PIETRO&PASQUALINA TRUSTEES 14115 SW 157TH TIGARD,OR 97224 2S102CB05300 W-2 PROPERTIES LLC 12415 SW 122ND AVE TIGARD,OR 97223 Gretchen Buehner 13249 SW 136th Place Tigard, OR 97224 Don & Dorothy Erdt 13760 SW 121st Avenue Tigard, OR 97223 Ellen Beilstein 14630 SW 139th Avenue Tigard, OR 97224 Todd Harding and Blake Hering Jr. Norris Beggs & Simpson 121 SW Morrison, Suite 200 Portland, OR 97204 Vanessa Foster 13085 SW Howard Drive Tigard, OR 97223 Susan Beilke 11755 SW 114th Place Tigard, OR 97223 CPO 4B 16200 SW Pacific Highway, Suite H242 Tigard, OR 97224 Patricia Keerins 12195 SW 121st Avenue Tigard, OR 97223 John Frewing 7110 SW Lola Lane Tigard, OR 97223 CITY OF TIGARD - CENTRAL INTERESTED PARTIES (i:\curpin\setup\labels\CIT Central.doc) UPDATED: 18-Sep-09 Josh Thomas ' san Be', e 10395 SW Bonanza 117-%4•W 114th Place Tigard, OR 97224 .gard, I" 97223 -tchen Bu= ner David Walsh 1324 ' . , 136th Place 10236 SW Stuart Court .rd, O' 97224 Tigard, OR 97223 odd Harding a • Blake Hering Jr. Paul Owen No _ Be•. : Simpson 10335 SW Highland Drive 121 Morrison Suite 200 Tigard, OR 97224 P:rtland, 0 97204 Tim Esau PO Box 230695 Tigard, OR 97281 '0 4B 1620 .W Pacific Highway, Suite H242 'gard, 0' 97224 Ross Sundberg 16382 SW 104th Avenue Tigard, OR 97224 Brian Wegener 9830 SW Kimberly Drive Tigard, OR 97224 Joseph Dyar 10285 SW Highland Drive Tigard, OR 97224-4668 Rex Caffall 13205 SW Village Glenn Tigard, OR 97223 N..•• Fr- g 71 ! & Lola Lane gard, O' •7223 CITY OF TIGARD - SOUTH INTERESTED PARTIES loc. I of 11 fi:Icuroln\seturAlabels\CIT South.docl UPDATED: 16-Dec-08 CITY OF TIGARD COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT PLANNING DIVISION 13125 SW HALL BOULEVARD 1111 TIGARD, OREGON 97223 PHONE: 503-639-4171 FAX: 503-718-2748(Attn: Patty/Planning) EMAIL: patty@tigard-or.gov tigard-orgov `T 1G A R D REQUEST FOR 500-FOOT PROPERTY OWNER MAILING LIST Property owner information is valid for 3 months from the date of your request INDICATE ALL PROJECT MAP&TAX LOT NUMBERS (i.e. 1S134AB,Tax Lot 00100) OR THE ADDRESSES FOR ALL PROJECT PARCELS BELOW: (If more than 1 tax lot or if the par as no address,you must separately identify each tax lot associated with the project.) \O2PI 0MO2-- ) P C L.- *4- t,994.4 So 9- AZ c( 1-\tb4tZPv--{ , Ti AL() o cI -?-2 2 3 PLEASE BE AWARE THAT ONLY 1 SET OF LABELS WILL BE PROVIDED AT THIS TIME FOR HOLDING YOUR NEIGHBORHOOD MEETING. After submitting your land use application to the City, and the project planner has reviewed your application for completeness, you will be notified by means of an incompleteness letter to obtain your 2 final sets of labels. IF YOU HAVE BEEN NOTIFIED BY PLANNING TO OBTAIN YOUR LABELS.PLEASE INDICATE BELOW THAT YOU NEED 2 SETS OF LABELS. �,Completeness Letter Received Indicating 2 Sets of Envelopes w/Affixed Address Labels Required The 2 final sets of labels need to be placed on envelopes (no self-adhesive envelopes please) with first class letter- rate postage on the envelopes in the form of postage stamps (no metered envelopes and no return address) and resubmitted to the City for the purpose of providing notice to property owners of the proposed land use application and the decision. The 2 sets of envelopes must be kept separate. The person listed below will be called to pick up and pay for the labels when they are ready. • NAME OF CONTACT PERSON: Yl ML` {,03.--Te-'a� PHONE: ( )-U�5- 3(- S NAME OF COMPANY: \-1iX SI bi'-) C,'1... DI.C. FAX: ( 3l ?j- g?Lt? EMAIL: y.2)hsrotc)11 coil liYj0bSA.,izDpP ODv) This request may be emailed,mailed, faxed, or hand delivered to the City of Tigard. Please allow a 2-day minimum for processing requests. Upon completion of your request, the contact person listed will be called to pick up their request that will be placed in'Will Call"by the company name(or by the contact person's last name if no company) at the Planning/Engineering Counter at the Permit Center. The cost of processing your request must be paid at the time of pick up,as exact cost can not be pre-determined. PLEASE NOTE: FOR REASONS OF ACCURACY, ONLY ORIGINAL MAILING LABELS PROVIDED BY THE CITY VS.RE-TYPED MAILING LABELS WILL BE ACCEPTED. Cost Description: $11 to generate the mailing list,plus$2 per sheet for printing the list onto labels(20 addresses per sheet). Then,multiply the cost to print one set of labels by the number of sets requested. -EXAMPLE- -COST FOR THIS REQUEST- A_sheets of labels x$2/sheet=$8.00 x 2 sets= $16.00 sheet(s)of labels x$2/sheet=Se x aG sets= - 1 sheets of labels x$2/sheet for interested parties x 2 sets= $ 4.00 sheet(s)of labels x$2/sheet for tterested parties= x_sets= GENERATE LIST = $11.00 EN t LIST = '_..:•,: TOTAL = $31.00 TOTA =$n of Oaf( 64,.2.742a 2S1O2CBO1802 BAR-AM,LLC BY GODFATHER'S PIZZA 1416 THIRD AVE SEATTLE WA,98 3/ / a Jame/IA fixt)-7\16 (' Dk;2°t'q -0001) APPLICANT MATERIALS Site Development Review Application for AUTOZONE STORE No. 3756 (PRE2009-00029) ry Submitted to: Current Planning Division City of Tigard, Oregon 13125 SW Hall Blvd. Tigard, OR 97223 Cheryl Caines, Associate Planner cherylc@tigard-or.gov 503.639.4171 503.684.7297, fax Prepared for: AutoZone Store Development Department#8320 123 S. Front Street Memphis, TN 38103 Mitch Bramlitt, Contact mitch.bramlitt @autozone.com 901.495.8714 901.495.8991, fax Prepared by: HDJ Design Group, PLLC 300 W 15th Street Vancouver, WA 98660 Tom Lonergan, Project Manager lonergant @hdjdesigngroup.com RECEIVED • 360.695.3488 360.695.8767, fax DEL z 1 2009 CITY OF TIGARD PLANNING/ENGINEERING DESIGN GROUP engineers I landscape architects planners surveyors ^d AUTO ZONE RECEIVED Table of Contents Tab FEB 0 4 2010 CITY OF NGINEERING TIGARD 1. Land Use Application r E 2. Title Transfer Instrument or Grant Deed i. Includes Title Report and Exception(easement)Documentation 3. Narrative i. Proposal Summary ii. Code Compliance Analysis iii. Impact Analysis 4. Neighborhood Meeting Documents i. Meeting Notice ii. Affidavit of Posting and Mailing iii. Sign in Sheet iv. Meeting Minutes v. Meeting Handout 5. Clean Water Services Provider Letter 6. Preliminary Sight Distance Certification 7. Pre-application Conference Notes 8. Filing Fee 9. Preliminary Storm Report 10. Arborist Report 11. Development Plans i. Cover Sheet ii. Site Development Plan 1. Includes Vicinity Map iii. Existing Conditions Plan 1. Includes Site Topography iv. Preliminary Demolition Plan v. Preliminary Grading&Erosion Control Plan vi. Preliminary Street& Storm Drainage Plan vii. Preliminary Sanitary Sewer& Water Plan viii. Preliminary Landscape Plan 1. Includes Tree Preservation/Mitigation Plan ix. Architectural Drawings x. Preliminary Lighting Plan 1 _ Land Use Application PRE-APR HELD By 11111 CITY OF TIGARD PLANNING DIVISION I 11111 LAND USE PERMIT APPLICATION City of Tigard Permit Center 13125 SW Hall Blvd., Tigard, OR 97223 TIGARD Phone: 503.639.4171 Fax:503.598.1960 File/41 2_diroci, amyl I Other Case# I Date />/a-1 1°41 By Is,�2 T Receipt# 1 (t 349`t Fee - 'av Date Complete TYPE OF PERMIT YOU ARE APPLYING FOR ❑Adjustment/Variance(I or II) El Minor Land Partition(II) ❑ Zone Change(III) ❑Comprehensive Plan Amendment(IV) ❑ Planned Development(III) El Zone Change Annexation(IV) ❑Conditional Use(III) ❑ Sensitive Lands Review(I,II or III) ❑Development Code Amendment(IV) ❑Historic Overlay(II or III) ®Site Development Review(II) • I ❑Home Occupation(II) ❑Subdivision(II or III) LOCATION WHERE PROPOSED ACTIVITY WILL OCCUR(Address if available) 13405 SW Pacific Highway TAX MAPS&TAX LOT NOS. Tax Lot 2S102CB01802,Tax Account#R994507 TOTAL SITE SIZE ZONING CLASSIFICATION .84 Acres C-G, General Commercial APPLICANT* AutoZone—Store Development Department 8320 — Mitch Bramlitt,contact MAILING ADDRESS/CITY/STATE/ZIP 123 S. Front Street,Memphis TN 38103 IPHONE NO. FAX NO. 901.495.8714 n/a PRIMARY CONTACT PERSON PHONE NO. HDJ Design Group PLLC Andy Nuttbrock,Project Manager 360.695-8767;360.695-8767,fax PROPERTY OWNER/DEED HOLDER(Attach list if more than one) Bar—Am, C — Isaac Baruch,contact MAILING ADDRESS/LLCITY/STATE/ZIP 1416 3rd Avenue,Seattle,WA 98101 PHONE NO. FAX NO. none available none available *When the owner and the applicant are different people,the applicant must be the purchaser of record or a lessee in possession with written authorization from the owner or an agent of the owner. The owners must sign this application in the space provided on the back of this form Ior submit a written authorization with this application. PROPOSAL SUMMARY(Please be specific) The applicant is proposing a 6,800sf auto-related retail business at the subject site. Site improvements will include: Ia new building, 30 parking spaces and associated landscaping. APPLICATIONS WILL NOT BE ACCEPTED WITHOUT ALL OF THE REQUIRED SUBMITTAL ELEMENTS AS DESCRIBED IN THE`BASIC SUBMITTAL REQUIREMENTS"INFORMATION SHEET. is\curpin\masters\land use applications\other land use applications.doc DIE APPLICANT$I-TALL CERTIFY1._IAT: ♦ If the application is granted, the applicant shall exercise the rights granted in accordance with the terms and subject to all the conditions and limitations of the approval. ♦ All the above statements and the statements in the plot plan,attachments, and exhibits transmitted herewith, In true;and the applicants so acknowledge that any permit issued,based on this application, map be revoked if it is Blond that any such statements arc false. • the applicant has read the entire contents of the application, including the policies and criteria, and understands the requirements for approving or denying the application(s). SIGNATURES OF EACH OWNER OF THE SUBJECT PROPERTY ARE REQUIRED. wner's Signature Date Owner's Signature Date Owner's Signature Date Owner's Signature Date Owner's Signature Date (�l 1 'r244-117--44-117--"Z-47-1`-- ) � - .. Applicant/Agent/Representative's Signature Date` Applicant/Agent/Representative's Signature Dare 1 THE APPLICANT SHALL CERTIFY THAT: I ♦ If the application is granted, the applicant shall exercise the rights granted in accordance with the terms and subject to all the conditions and limitations of the approval. ♦ All the above statements and the statements in the plot plan,attachments,and exhibits transmitted herewith,arc true;and the applicants so acknowledge that any permit issued,based on this application, map be revoked if it is ' found that any such statements are false. ♦ The applicant has read the entire contents of the application,including the policies and criteria,and understands the requirements for approving or denying the application(s). SIGNATURES OF EACH OWNER OF THE SUBJECT PROPERTY ARE REQUIRED. I Owner's Signature Date Owner's Signature Date Owner's Signature Date Owner's Signature Date Owner's Signature Date - c-pzo►-le, ,�C. 12 �3 I °9 IApplicant/Agent/Representative's Signature Date Applicant/Agent/Representative's Signature Date 1 1111 CITY OF TIGARD RECEIPT .1 • . 13125 SW Hall Blvd.,Tigard OR 97223 503.639.4171 TIGARD Receipt Number: 176364 - 12/21/2009 CASE NO. FEE DESCRIPTION REVENUE ACCOUNT NUMBER PAID SDR2009-00007 SDR Under$1,000,000 1003100-43116 $3,873.00 SDR2009-00007 SDR Under$1,000,000-LRP 1003100-43117 $572.00 Total: $4,445.00 PAYMENT METHOD CHECK# CC AUTH.CODE ACCT ID CASHIER ID RECEIPT DATE RECEIPT AMT Check 543693 STREAT 12/21/2009 $4,445.00 Payor AutoZone Total Payments: $4,445.00 Balance Due: $0.00 Page 1 of 1 Title Transfer Instrument or Grant Deed The current property deed is included as required. 1■• . -----....■ ■ .... •.... ...01210PX.M. ..••■■••11■,....... .11.1. 10:11.11•.... sem■- r.FriireSiii4-''L'..;:.4712:11..";=: 17:.{:17.19ntrr,1;:f.. ...:V?:•■•■;:n.S.-5:7".71r4i.:4c037-Fi7grt.oZi'i 7)14 -1-xuatavegarc2---L- -------;4112:_,---' ...'4,:::..,-„*-- .!.. .anw; . ...-::.v2: et -.:.t---.-..--.-- _ .-------r zt,A'v.---4.,N. s, "4-To'- .-7-' 1,.. Khr. .,t,r--1•• -.-.*r•• ,, ■"•''''`...: -..21---.‘-'.4,.• ;',.: . ...'"*.- ..— - ... .....■ f ,;..... eaqn i46.4.1"-.7..t1,01t,.4{.6.7n.,:nr,riFT.Ity.14 Ir.I,-.....„.....,. . . 4.11161SAZOO.- : . .L." 9 311)08 9 A [ : 0. WARRANTY INKYA-styrirmay pupa Tfo*Magian Doing 6 I .1 1 • ,; C.Hoc 010AM• '.--. viumijigliiir corporation day caloalsect and ealstinil wrier the laws et the&we ol..- .- . -.-.....,.......--......1..13earttat. , earrreys end warrants fo Jgtig..tlaigh...rXMOX.CL4.N.I.3.01.r...C.§A..)44 if SOP•lartle'll-e-atmgma -..... ' .- -- — - - --. .-...... . . --- • the t011owinj*scribed rest property ha of weernrbranesa except es • .--.- . . ■ sPecitiantly rer form herein li i I?filed fri........MtkiniaRib.........-......--County.Oregon.to-witt ' Ad Attached hereto as Exhibit "A" awl wade a port hereto by this reference ' • , . i I ittesast..0tql OCONTY ' q ara,A afron'Pri, ritelallit row .. It '-' 'IM.1 i SfSca.cat3 .11:_ii -:3,,,t,.., 4 . ..,r• -------- FEE PAW PSC A ' . I F SI= 4Ie WAN%DVITINUS 04SCIMIOn Oro Ptvait illql , i The said properly is tree born aft encumbrances except C Those matters attached hereto ea Exhtbit "Be' and eisde a pat. herein by this reference . i. The true aornklerarton for this ccirreyarice h 4.35.Q..QIN.,.%....(Rent comply with ths rarridrwnsate al ORS 9103 ) ;; fel ;; ;;; =-.----. ,,....0 nperitY16 21117175 INS-1-n- ALLOW iN viarliffi OPEA-gUrArg -11 - F 1, _Ii.4 Kii,,terl..P9.r.E.9.Kg g.91-. . {NI-.6P/MG Ats14512 l'-',41-suuliV.TITAN NINO OR AC- IST THE FROFEKFY SHOULD waCiL%MI Mt Ar3Rof RI:%r;•c a fro .-Adid b s • ear-."-F"'kfenl --2.- ,,,zr courcrr PLANA ND IMPART/4NT TO VERIFY AR,O0 VI 0 USES. g Rivt... (Coax:IRATE S zAL) ifr ............ .............. ....,...-....,.........—,......Socre tory Eltrnea..r- ;,.., s re.r.7 0.t.rgAtt4taiew or _ King )A., 140-4/e4b*K. ■ PoffoonAffr appe..4 _Robert...E..tdamostaki . itadc , . ee eti bind o duty room,did Ur Mal 14.1011/014444, .... president makelquotiadalconck NM% ISF.---•*•-•" •-......... . -xairatiSLCktteStirrip: .. . . ..., Ci 4.0044:X.• .petedo....1 thm dk.0;140141,d fo Ow RaLl•AM 101410alf^g I ..1" Jr ON;rWirmv.;...I AI rodd teryx:rtden.., bil ......ef ir....ftrr-• sr.. :lad 7.,i d la 61:411 of mid es.rpaadoo iw makority di to iota•I direr,lats:And each of Merl eel 'al 1400100r1 ea• its a M4i end deed. ... A (CceptelAt.sem.) 641-Ass...4....t„ =gaff,. v7- 5:: ‘44"14,40 ..,.'.' I;Pea', r wow r vanratHa-too-o.pfroa--...,...1:17.1...."4Y -tRAL -0 ' G:' ,rated me. WARRANTY IDECIR P., 'P TAT OF OREGON, tagac..Jfia riach,...Truotee...u.nder 61"7";';-.." • i• Willo .Sart d ss. •• -- . .-c .; 1.333 Mird...avenue...Seat.r.l.t.L..Wa. 98111. f certify that Me OA Midrib ..'.-;4•i t ti" aa a ,„nacatv a VP merit was received for record or the ..1'.?..v‘f..4 ! Mew wading roan In • Harald Coe a...........-.......e'crock--M_and recanted , ......... . ... .-.....---.-.................... masa imaillirall 00 Frisco isle Ler rine in trook/reet/eohrme No.-...-........-on — ... -,-_,...-.....-..—..... fee .:t+4..R..1.4 ., Ha Olien..Stay_,11000 •FROMPelaa 6 Ma Aide......__. of as doeumenefleeffik/ .; '• iiiiiiiii..-vasidijan-riircii:iiil-—' irliffurnanthnietolilat No Record of Deeds at said comfy. •.1 ..,...Aaa i Wi mem flay hand ape Hal of •1 I IRO•diiinia nintindold.aat Pa/faalontall ' . -A All Ilre we'le lko teIlevAp weime, Ceuta y ailixed. -41 J,131..Th a 131 Av_enait,_,._.,._,....._ _ ..,,a -•-•--— -- • ,...% II ..,...,:r •-.-,:,:.'....-i .-..'1....r.:: , 7,,...'-TERA7.. *F•"--77../.(li:‹,;..":. i'l..}.:7i;;;I''.-14.:''.•'.•.4',.-.•:n,.. -VILV•0;^ s'i.',k1.1.."',..„,_.,,•%M. 4•S'.,..;.;.';;zt.-... •:2,1.4.4 ;;;;•fi:rEr.A....-•••..'..:4*04.1.‘'rrtre'• N;••••4•••■••'4;:kg.7"-A-..:•:g;•••tr.(WO:3M:-;.'• "4,g-.24.0• 76'.!,.;-)' =-..-.....- 'dr s• r.e.k!...'.,-.0.1-itc::.,A.t.LA•c.r...v.be.....id,.;:cri„.,..,.., ,,,,.... .,,,.,.. _........;:az...,---.1-L.._-,-,f,,.....s,..,.• : •.::2;:t:44tr •A,...".511.•41,..r..1-4'.7:,........c.ta,;,;:e.' gsi$.t. , - ...-....,-..v 1._•*.4.,41-. .,V:4-., -- " IN.*..:Ii.k' ''. ..: ,'• ••s,.. At44''. .31.1.7ii.":14,'".,1""1,1,!t! . . 'Orx.-:''i....W..;;;;"'"42::."34-., Ilt".., ..''''.. ..„444 ___----- 0,..-6,,„.,...,.i. .fift-411, 04;;;..4,-,c•:.-:= ..-...:Nlir•44 ' -1,'"?e'...%. 4 •-; .,.. !n.., •• •q..114,if$ •• t'•',4 ------ .......r.iri■' ',t•„ ,-^",.141i; .- ..;I ,,,si: :-,44:4, .fl .i.. .%,.. ,r „ ' ,..241;Will,14R-v".10 *44 * ••••:'.',.,-,n-,--.1, :--ilw tiP:4,.,•0•:?z,,,e,„1.. `."4-ii-Wy:.:'.6,--,',Avire.it-mgi d!,-, ? •, -----,--,-,EFAC-t.L.:2:1&47-'.,,:=145,k- .41N.:47..7.-.rfpt,o.'•-•..1.*....K1714;., 4:401,. . -ilz-zg-,. 't 41-,45. •.. 4: P.; ,,t -7721:3,4-t.:,..;t::t .•t .;qir..71;v -t.' -.... .i.frr':.,4,4..',..,,,:, .,..::.• .inA /...ki;... --. ...z.:,...,..,... .- .j 4,4 •. 7:11#1c,VVV.4-41-', ,..V-- '1.3;::•i-tfe;;.,•'i..'41 ',1 "--...)'4,'"”: t,,..1.1.,..s-at.."`• , ,...‘p4-erAo. ,-i,)7.:.3",`,"tr.r?fi„tei: .41-.1),41..„-v.-6,, '....,K,,i.'telt5'1,.l'‘.• :If AO -, :-.1.,.....11X.9 .' vs,...-..,.. 3.,;;,.t 1........,,,,t4: ,...i.L., ,,e4.„,..tt.,... ._.,, ...J.V...,11.•■2.-..1117',.:litt,, ,W,A.Ii+t,1..., .v:V...•,..N.I.,01.,...P4140.7.•;;V:•-•",e•I•.•4•..--4 jr .,71•1•44l'i •:. ''--4..-'' gr-t.- 4iNW•'t' .L..? .0yea.p.kv. ,,..t:iiitCz54. ..NSIN°1-40.t4.it,-1:›ti;.14,4 ,ANSWt:WW-t -''-'70"*.c.'.. -.?:1 IA' 17-;.1:V-• "•-•:•11.,- r,IV:k..:'' -Ar. 14.v":tr-W*1-.).:Vls.' t V11- '. 1 =.Itzia---.--2‘,-.,---... c . ,•• .1 ziar-z.2'0,0- ....t. •;A:..s:fr.•eSe,q..0t.■r ea,W.I.}...iii,q7 ..e:,•..'.,:.n."...4 1.... , --. '.. 11 , . -. ..., ice `•• •!,M, ..,. 441*. .t.,-46Y,..,•1-",4.-'... 4.1?,1._...1-oul,,,.. ,1,:.!...0,..'n-,' : -,;, 044 .213 mange;i::,tr ''',t,‘ "•14.,177,-;2'../it.'•':".7.'‘;'.419114,1,t4*,:l2..',.t.ya.:i•'••■••ViTiakt..1/ AC,t;it•' -,C. 1 ' -'IC ef.. _:,..._ „.,,,..L.-,...:...-.. -•■■••••••- ---7:•• •••-•-"- -1-. ,7...7,,,.,•.,,,,. ■'•-.VrAg'7"7-77 7—.-7= •• .____—— S.Chandra-WS:1993 93100694 . 1 of 6 .1.■ , -----.. ..era- 4riu.;, r ...tre r. ,, �.r-- .-Y w _ - -'-� 7�9 _ ' .-7YV?7Fr�r'&•Y.li 4i"r7�Ci'' 7.-.-.-x• ---mss"IR ` 1.-ir$`e 1.‘4.-, li 1 ',r, :9,x41sSI,i : A. --_ 1-. } rL. 4-;-t. -r w M• ' EXHIBIT=A" _- — Description; 20D AMENDED LEGAL DE8CR2PTI0H igA tract of land in the Southwest one-quarter of Section 2, Toveehip t, 2 South, Range 1 West of the Willamette Meridian, in the City of Tigard, 1.. County of Washington end State of Oregon, described as follows: Beginning at the Northeasterly corner of that property deeded to f. Alexander 3. Luty and Pauline E. Luty and described in Bock 355, Page 74 of the Deed Records of Washington County, maid point of beginning ---• being North 89'48'40" East 283.23 feet from a two inch iron pipe marking 1.• the initial point of KELROSB, a plat of record, said point also being on the Northwesterly boundary of the relocated West Side Pacific Highway - (Oregon State Highway 4S, West); thence North 33'15'17' east along P the Northwesterly boundary of said Pacific Highway 85.00 feet Co the true point of beginning; thence North 56'44'43' West, 140.00 feet; 3: 'fit thanes. North 33'15'17" East 181.15 featF thenoa worth 56"44'43" West, 11, ` ° 28.00 feet; thence North 33'15'17' East, 68.00 feet; thence South 1:- .' 56'44'43" East, 168.00 feet to the Northwesterly right of way of said ! Iii Pacifif Highway; thence South 33'15'17" West, along said right of way ;. 249.15 feet to the point of beginning. �.'! TOOBTHER WITH an easement for ingreel and egress, said eaeenont ii �; `l described as followsf F r _.. A treat of land in the Southwest one-quarter of Section 2, Township =g.,a 2 South, Range 1 West of the Willamette Meridian, in the City of Tigard, -, County of Washington and State of Oregon. Beginning at the Northeasterly corner of the above described tract; i thence North 56.44'43' Weet, 168.00 feet; thence South 33'15'17' West [r :,Q,,; 68.00 feet; thence North 56'44'43" !Peat, 12.00 feet; thence North 1 i` 33'15'17' East, 88.00 feet; thence South 56'44'43' East, 180.00 feet to the Northwesterly right of way of said Pacific Highway; thence South I 33'15'17' West, along maid right of way 20.00 feet, more or lees, to € the point of beginning. 1' v ALSO TOOETHBR WITH an easement for ingress and egress described as iGi follows: -341 Situate in the eouthweet one-quarter of Section 2, Township 2 south, 1 _s::, Range I Meet of the Willamette Meridian, in the City of Tigard, County of Waehington and State of Oregon, and being described as follows Beginning at a point on the West right-of-way line of Pacific Highway 7' (V.3. Highway 99W), said point being South 00'01'10" Seat a distance of 697.57 feet, South 00.00•L3• East a distance of 607.67 feet, North 89'48'12' East s distance of 283.23 feet, and North 33'15'17' East • Dated November 30, L993 Page 2 2637433H r 'tdj" ,' ,,,�i11 ,; ::/+ 91G"w-;_;. ~44 -.‘-',..e,;:1,iC.i 61.717 '� � i +,.:, c ,�7 ?� �zfl.a t„as .}.A4r [S kk , l ✓ Y X41 i .wde"�Z e ' —.___— , - y� �P < Y�` �: al-' Fs :1'J4. it K, '=1; At+-01 o�+� .. _.-_-_ s,{�f A%u:?1�,. G.attAa17c,'Ct' '}✓�ra�r".?a�-::lte ,. .,, 4 w•+i S. ?4 `Vc3�ls•—__-'---- i ofstr t G/ 1;: ".��+r yt. e y�-r Qi 7�i :r,{{,r'Jy�r4 ttP.44: • t:y`4Y y `,'.7.G 4r Yx _.a f . i9 'S y t. 7' SJt T fi �4.11. fA .. --- ; Yist ts` {`LP r l� x+"ra�1r4 ,f}�- ,� ,,Y r .1 Ply rgti i s .l�rr.�r, f'St: G .. .. , JG4v yy�h.;.4,'z r i 'yL�C s s.:I. l+ ki,NsT.t4lr 't w'�� '.�., X1: 1 14K' ^, y �+. 0r ' . 7/ '0.- '1ti F b Sh,.:::..1.....A... - r. ritr,, hY T 1'-a4 h r,; q ii :tir ' T YF .s S 4's.t r F„Ln Jed r .. q. .,.� ..- 't;�•'xtei;�;,9 =��slnsw v�Iw. .... ro.sar�.1:ti.s.. ,. . -. 1 ,: - l.:.v i•a S_ChEuidra-WS:1993 93100694 2 of 6 ia.' 'K;E:$0»:iYwa,,.,,iic..`:.wr...::-2h:i 7 .-.trrJt:r.-17-•a.,,•p,j��tY,'[t. --.n-•..�o "� -.-._�"-nW Tr ` ' 4.1• rZ -`�`f--$�.�5��.'� �,•� ... mot-___ —____ .._. -..:.�.....�"..f.'R}_Yd?r tat•�• .'� r`5,.�... ,Lt� 'YyJ 1-t r 'T =-,�vI — r aL disten4e of 85.05 feet from the west one-quarter corner of said Section 2, said point also being the Southeast corner of that parcel recorded in Fee No. 78-41342 and running thence South 33'15'17" West - an the aforementioned Wegt right-•of-fay line a distance of 51.00 feet: thence leaving said West right-of-way line and running North 56'44'43" West a distance of 44.02 feet) thence North 00'11'48" West a distance r, of 61.07 foot to a point on the South line of said Fee No 78■41342; _• j thence South 56'46'46• East on said South lino a distance of 77.68 feet to the point of beginning. ::/ FURTHER TOGETHER WITH an easement for a private sanitary sewer line ,_ described es follows: >�! .. Situate in the Southwest one-quarter of Section 2, Township 2 South, ir.- Ran.ge 1 Neat of the 4►illeaette meridian, is the City of Tigard, Count re' Y 4 , y Fes_ of Washington and State of Oregon, and being a portion of that parcel described in Document No. 60-2867, Washington County Book of Records Ii•R" as surveyed by County Survey No. 21,826 and Lying 7.5 feet on each 1:y . 1 side of the following described centerline: ima, :1. irF.. Commencing at the Northerly Northwest corner of the Public Storage �_ — property as surveyed by said County Survey No. 21,856; thence along i$ra the North line of the Publio storage property and the South line of (""" Fee No. 19-8792, North 69'08'25" East a distance of 322.04 feat; thence (�' South 14'28'00° West a distance of 110.95 feet to a point on the East ��' line of said Public Storage parcel and the at line of Fes Na. 50-2867 ;1r- and the true point of beginning of the aforementioned centerline; thence A South 14'28'00' East a distance of 29.84 feet to a point or the Mi'' Southwesterly line of said Fee No. 80-2867 and point of termination irlyr. of said centerline. The side linos to be lengthened or shortened to ' . ii begin and end on the boundary Line of said Fee No. 80-2867. :n FURTHER TOG£T}C3P. WITH an easement for a private sanitary easier fins iwf .e • described as follows: ,�-_ '" bitdate Id the Southwest one-quarter of Section 2, Township 2 South, -' mange 1 West of the Willamette Meridian, in the City of Tigard, County of Washington and State of Oregon, and being a portico of the Public :'3 Storage property as surveyed by County Survey ?o. 21,856 and lying -'�"' = 7.5 feet 04 each aide of the following described centerline: ) ' Beginning at a point on the North line of the Publics Storage property ti�,,. and the South Line of Fee No. 79-8792, said paint being North 89'08'25` �' Sant a distance of 322.04 feet from the Northerly Northwest oorte>: +r: of said Public Storage parcel and running thence South 14'28'00" West ";n:: ;, a distanoe of 110.95 Peet to the end thereof, said point being on the '- _ East line of said Publio Storage parcel and the West Line of Fee No. V 80-2667. The side lines to be lengthened or shortened to begin on -,4,. + r the said North line and terminate on the said East line. ,. . y,, and as described as: Doted November 30, 1993 Page 3 2637433Hs. 1Y: : ' r' T + fit .. i<E• c 1 s i- yktrYv,ri,7` :,.*,f:,-, •Y u. ,'yr !:! Z �:':;• .:' �}' jr fp.^ ��a{ -,„v,-„2 tt rf- .,..,:z.. ':-,+� •t-:' y.?'. ,.`- 4 ..-_ , r.nGj'�'+t... 3�� X`•JK rL l" r•1 Y�'�r1�a 1 1.,....*•4,l Cr7 t�.r,'Si� .S`•.t r ° -,r� ..• S'; .:Al,-P1 svC,F � .\,' .k 1X lir.•ly 'F 1�f a •; y,`^1th ,@ ' ....4` _ .t iii. if! � t/.1•��'7,•y.,0, .h�..ry.c.,.�t.M #A -•+'••ihi 4NM'j.e -Yc'l'' . is-tleg"', t•.ul' .�Sy:iS�4� i 14-!.4 'i,n t i � ! � '$q2J r. -��i may, r1• . - - '' y .1 r.-fitt.F k iWit 1i l� fl ' -S i �.j r -t - 'a(r 7"`j'ryak~ f � t'1,' '��-. x'i: --—_.. _ �f S�t fl}'7� �i�,y°,�ie r ,y .r � �r� -y;;'.,��lrz' a Y �s. CS. f�F� �&-,.t6 A ly 1 '�3 ,.14�r r�rs.Sti.. T.t�iZr{T�a ,`3Ul"� r frrli a .A+� i �r .'; •7..Y ..s cT rr,. ,",11'.-.F' v'''1 ry .r':I is k•" Zr r. t.:Y. f ., r �y' J.f .; .71,,s,,,...:. RZ. .7, -- --- = ✓4rs:4•i a f• r f'�� 'f '•1 �l�'i'rt J 3�'N^_ ';?:17 J 1- s, f,; 'mo t-., ,, i•n4:. t gL�t. .11,14v-r,- P."i:. __ 4,- r ,1 r+" ,;`,1 S' .•VAWr -. to y y 1 . --- i +• "--,.....v6, ''1,i...:,, ,�, 4 :4t; ' , 1:0154 :::1?..:.-...r X1 �}V%�,"],'rit'r -.�.,tv�'{q, 'x a;. ... 'u. ,_L ,: 'Lr!{, ?'7 vL . 4` 'Sai,_.74 x•ee ,,... -.•-. ae .-..-^y..wm:r�Lull.....•rH n-u`_- ms.t,.ff:-.r. _...:•r •- ....-.._.a x__ .�....«w V..-. •--�' • S.Chandra-WS:1993 93100644 3 of 6 J:+t_ rJ4•• 4• .ti ) - t A '4w w..,oso ,"-ft`t • • Situate in the Southwest one-quarter of section 2, Township 2 South, Range 1 Meet of the Hillarnrtte Heti:Sian, L:► the City of Tigard, County of Washington and State of Oregon, and being 15.00 feat wide and lying 7.50 feet on each aide of the following described centerline: heginninq at a point which is South 19'30'00" West a distance of 20.04 feet and North 10'3000" West a distance of 7.50 feet from the tiorthWeet corner of that parcel described in fau No. 80-2867, and running thence South 19'30'00• West parallel and 7.50 feet Westerly of the West line of said Pee b1o. 6O-2967 a distance of 123,81 feet to a point on the Northoaaterly line of that parcel described in Fee No. 76-41342, said point being South 56'44'434 Salt a distance of 5.50 feet Pram the meet Northerly Northwest corner of Tee No. 76-41342. The side lines of said strip to be shortened or Lengthened to terminate at the West bounder*, of said Fee No. 76-4t142. -. I• • FP- is"• N_! rte:: �t}wna, Dated `lovember 30, 1993 Page 4 2637433K ar ''`i. 'j,J. '' ...a.y` �.-•�lu g' ( ` • q;e � tt''� ' S fa ''"t;,�i:j+., �N•• t:.5;r'N j;'.��, y^r. �"•g^'' a = •}� • 1' �Ll�V , .":14:14c 'f9 }. ti~�C �t'+Qt { ••t TF r rr r 'l3 n. }. t� r �'�; �fi/�•x ,�� `��=fi�� 7- Feat: _sue �l� t 1 4:1t.e. r J J r a . Le; r lid �t �s�'7 r � e r e1 t: suer �+ t'ir. fin �t -..-� r.R u,u7iz mh% r. e,y,a�ww!. .. .. n,.r _ �_�cr... "Ri7.1�JK�� _� . 'Fl.F'Y i 1•p+ t,�. r3L�.. s+ ._.. ��...� .. ��.��.�� i-�•,ti:"�!H`jy/a �j "• �� 4.�F•klIM11C-+n�r_.n=..aTa',�- _ Tt.; . .-*;1R ! '`1..M�..."�w�+.W.-�.ina�•wi.�.i+Mr1��.r-. S.Chandra-WS:1993 931 00694 4 of 6 ,. - ._._.._._. ''' FI ->•,�4114-' r' T i JSfA4allii4ii. !t �,7 +'tee,- a._-�613urtr;��___ --- ._...____r=,∎•••i'..lif.�l a3NfiulilFA.. 1"="13+ 5:: ___ _'.-. 4I-rrT5 ,an .�vf,,}RV.'.'KY a.'Yi +Zi�:?::�•w.r.._..�.� ' EXHIBIT "8" •-- An easement created by instrument, including the terra end provisions thereof, Mated : Augunt :1, 1978 Recorded : November 1S, 1978 Recorder's Fee No.: 78050440 - le favor of : Adjacent property • For : Ingress And agrees ----- Location : A 12 foot strip along the Northwesterly and 20 feet along the Northeasterly bounderise Terme and COnditione contained in instrument - -.-- Dated : Augest 31, 1978 Recorded 1 November 15, 197E -- Reoorder's Fee No.: 78050441 An easement created by instrument, including the terms and provisions thereof, Dated : February 7, 1985 Recorded : February 11, 1985 Recorder's Fee No.: 850050?3 and 85005075 ire favor of : Wayne C. Rembold , For : St.en Satan purposes Affects the appurtenant eaeeaent recorded Jeneaty 22, 1988 an Recorder's Fee ido. 68003147. Joint Accoes Enaenent end Maintenance Agreement, including the :- terra and conditions contained in instrument, -- Dated 1 July 29, 1967 Recorded : January 22, 1988 Recorder's Fee No.: E8-03147 Between : Public Storage Institutional Fund And Pietro's Corporation 1---__. Terms and provisioae contained in an easement benefiting the subject property in instrument, i�-.. €Al ;..�_. From : Wilbur Bishop, Jr. - To : Pietro's Corp. For 1 A private sanitary eewer line re Reoorded 1 January 22, 1988 s'=- Recorder's Fee HO.: 85-03148 ii1Mit.: And in instrument iarca:l: :ter., From . Public Storage Institutional. Fund erFee iM,e,MA.=, To . Pietro's corp. :;- ' For : A private sanitary sewer line l>::" Recorded : January 22, 198E teleeee, Recorder's Fee 1c.: 88-03149 1 - Syr .t _ f•' , x,. fly.S' 4. �rj.'4M'� r.. :. '4, , u:15iy,*..X.0.,S�vi:0- M 1 ti,':.•... 1r . d.}}:.�: w,. '- r pW'}7 i a,:, 7 .1. d 2514 C .iq" .sa ---- Y w}t aLty�il..fj`„ St e. at +" `r . '� V ,` -� 'tea;{ydrP�E4!'.4 a ,8 ..e,„-.T_ c1 y n f„ tU u• .r3. t .• y.-F b ar 'ry`�1, r uc�it '',sva.1 '4�' l:4.4 , y�5� k�.pA 1- rT;l!t ' zs'T tt` t _ .. i w+.l�'' C']t1 ;i a''•r.4 +h'�^ ,�14'r "�:nh •oi''"°h,W ' i ,.,, y;�....•'i.' c s�ti 1' 411 1 T Z'. '� '1`$'•, ri;1.; ,tf a'' f a 1 agy4, k"i 7`Ar,� .i7 r ,, -VI,>d 1 Ff. u.._. - - - N'� � 2�d,yitiA•:14if'iy ,,i` �c Y.��t.��ti"!'. n.i3 Sty:walti^�w f y „ a} �}-74 '~'1lt,�$r. ^a'` 'r: ∎ 1 r .;, riR �:c' oa•'^� k�l'r., r k�..��,,yy �"'°f,-z+rn* Y^'• � + .:: -- ---- ... _yr_:r is 1.I `k''' . ..''' 4ti,f , frt1F!:',. - - - __.'_ __ — - �i`. .. ;,ij n z .:r.., e ?= _ _'.-_—.._ .__. .._ vm.1, .wiruri. Or s°NE".fw�� 14D41aw.1A4iiMi+6meabfJ t.ij i�.. . _ ...----- .. ._air,-...'::bJ�•ods i7,yty ....j lfi.5j.. s... � . •-•=_._...... __ ...,:rvr.e......ii, P„,,.. ,,..y lea'.xmo.kd is vCia'..4, �` a r : Y "'' ' ,- 7 1 i.... Y fr.t.; .---- .r.,4:7,..-_ !.. LA h.t.`.�i''T,v..w�.,ws s M�:„. '._. .. .srs_ '.P.-4 ...,.,41LITI r1.:�1.: ..te:;a.... .a:,...e._4.. 1......:.2. ...Kt� } S.c:halldra-WS:1993 93100694 5 of 6 .._ __-__ .. •YYNh•.F1..1hn0i'L r.E= a.it'7/.. A 'SfI S ._.—.—_�_._.__-. 'JUr101mhw RZ�%i Z}f T_In"'""wi.`. •,—_ �'-11T� 7.'r�'•' 7,YRY9!�;p;',NVIIKM yjM!�m�-+•._._ The effect of that certain document, including the terms aad provisions thereof, Entitled : Reciprocal Access Eesasent and Landscape Easement Agreement ::I Dated r October 25, 1993 ^— Recorded : November 2, 1993 Recorder's Pee No,: 93091:4 From t Public Storage Institution Fund •� ± To s Taco Bell Corp., a California corporation Encroachments as disclosed by Survey, — Dated : November 23, 1993 Prepared by : Chase, Jones & Xaaooiatee, Inc. Project No. : 8754 "'" (A) Overhead lines over the Southeasterly 3 feet. -- --- (8) Fire hydrant and water lines near the Northeast corner. _ (C) Underground electric linos serving the transform pad to the -- I West of the property. Exact location of line uncertain. (D) Fencing and concrete wall along the Northwesterly line. ___ -= i:-: _ SYATEOFOREGON l f SS rf County os Washkrgton r,.1err,Potant,crotiBcb,0 Aseoea•• �_ men d.1i t to end'G1��1E(do Courtly Ire_, auk tot4a[a•tou.ol f.Au beiutry V•erdtY that ea,.. Iho With(Itl ns u pl +s recatved s-:' find ro erd d•i lupole'Gt tuaocdY:01*old d':1-'• GOeRly.;a•7 "L;::f•} mN,r L OR "4W110 eterk E'1' Doc : 931x4694 I . Rect: 112611 408.00 tea. 12/02l1993 122l4:06PK r:a • F, 111.w- dfH x!;•1((1.01 .- Orel �n — •W.T'- r Y .1 y, i P:.1 .V. 7f.. • yam.--,_:^_..^-^ice t'+•V'tAA'-'t i 3;1jiSla{ it, P' AI'fat ' ,kn`' .` r§44 •Sq ��`. kc$i ,_ se.� :r=.,•_• -'•. ? ..,'....x.;fr•r t d<Sti M _ .�_•°. .'' «" 'M ;;"Fii dS,i�r.*s� am--'.: ------7;2x._ -• 4SN4 1 sea... f?r: .. '.�•=—s=__ _� - `fin.'4Lf� .- ` - t_��as _..._— ss'c; �'t� 'C{�PiGigs,, ':�",� 3��A w �?y� `� �Gy7 rat r -- ::�cae •TSti-iR.111, .1K�L.'/t t 't ..Z i3..{ ..amr.u.�:O.ro _ . �, ., ,� .eLi•A -:��w.4---1,r.Y.-4Fx m'9'ti7s3644,1. i'�f`-.9:4 rrr ""� ,:a', �' .`.r l3 r� 1,.°�� ,..an'?-v7..._.c....�..:.•e..,'�'ii.• �d. yt•�.ie__ ¢wn.M.��` ....._L.Z...,....:'1'r.1•P .L.1i.:1...... :..4.7 , ..•a.Lfr'.' ir,... • S.Chalidra-WS:1993 93100694 6 of 6 iMP 1 le, Urmar'i Rpm&Adtrod OMIT OF OREGON } tip r .. ;oMil l:xt� Coretll of Washington 56 r►a Sul rrH's faw4:ra +•. ",� 1410IX00Amour L Arndt OolimilofilrgrAl Aliso 4 • road told Main OAe' 0 001141 APiI01 Clerk loriaaldd doynt�y do e vit rlliy the thovrlOtldllMt►uroOtt SOT Ore WAR re:rk tut4 Nos AA3daar and regard : ttavh 61otd •of cold 13411.A01 yc ty ova*, ;, I I I, d lalwal • 1410Tdr4Memo t* M Bawl,WA 01101 h• WbmRaardWRIe.4TO! 'JW{ R.)1p�tpd 1�Ireolvr bt ,,9 firowQcoo ! At1HaAtpdNt.nrJfwwMon,Ek• TOOOIw Way,n.U 1100 0011nOu.c0Nr0 Cork BeabWA Polo 1•IPI1 Do0 99073186 (t— IMO I Polo wad04ArwW,Amol ral RQatI 233783 46.00 IllgoonorAo To: 06/15/1999 01155,11pm Cara9 all oixAre trtlirt ti.AIM D11U KNOW L I W Ti WAN rR1 0 9 1 4 4111 Iui 1BMt:e,DARIK:tl,TRUMP R UNDER TIIK WILT,or HAM Ili.1ANUUII,daaoki.a>Fdd,4Arsar.t put torrolaircol atm sow n.DARUIYITIIbTAMKNTANY1RllrlronAi 10,II+91drwtw4 toIBAAC l,BARUIll,Ad 10 AK CHOW;O)DU*-1tAGP(K O Ir1IBRYAT AND RELMAAM RA.AR TOM UNUSYLDBDGLIIALY(d)IN TWAT,Mt 1'I:NANDI3NCOMMON.Iloilo air taldfhadan,Ibr <a U Ote.Aralatheninat larured,dewhnrohyrrn:ae,n'uxw dAl.rqukdalin onto UA1LAMLLMIO WLIA11Il,t1'YC't1MPAlYe,had odor clad WSW%MO ,w uao 0rada'a hale a.aooaNOn gad odirs,rn of Iho 4coraft ti✓th6 till/a:J Wow lo dsaf A,utn,ut p ipw:y,Wilk ell lawman's,Wedtamr,u+rd ppoodrww« ^ti omo b Women.a loony wayamaNknIo,Ktuxi+eInWA.r//jeM'rA/Ll cwdy,bwaorrxisa,dnwlb4d10 WWI A. (S� To nov4 and to lf04;oho wow wag pnrwvd thaws%Rolm,IMOrw►sod ao pratra+/r,+ 5 at Thataw rola:we merldradon paid foe this Low*,,gated In lemr of diAn,la 4 C .� a f lows•rr.t7w*One ooadd.i lcc cowl& peccooty eaBv n prom:bedwWd:Ii i4ifboQlhtwOo:+(4lkafawhkit)wrliwaUana(S1 pontoomlwtrwnvrtyn.bml►w,Ynal In aond:fulls Oils Read.uhra Ma mint ao rayebu,l u aliC+hr ki Codor Or pke al.ant a0,panrwled.throws too rods w I8u data load~Fill$wly aqutly to oorporutoaa rod to rodvidcak IN WIT Wiai J Hrl1NRY.UY.Um to unor loss aanial:Nr imYomiont Ja / u thy `""` X 19 .U warily lr.wypwatlaadl amuad1bname b 4adtpwd tai to au3,ifany,aBloodby a.otflaaror Mar Arson duty auOarirodro dv ea Voodoo OM d4aolora T1CIBCNSTRUAlbNT i ILL NOT ALLOW Ult1&WTT1*PYDFL'RV( L l -•--� r�7 y- o80CRf 6EDINT1111I NSTIIUu11tNT:NWOIATIONOPA1R11CA1Wk '• .e-r•-.r• `'7 :i: Y Q<......� 4+C L.- "h41..5va... LAN DOWI LAWS ANURP,QUf,AT1Wl9.HI!Foli waNtproOR 1JMUR.IMARUt 71,':rale Fodor lhiWNfor Bur IIBorah 4!. ACCEPT1NO11118^ISraulaxr.TIM MOM ACQUIRING Mt fa �; rC~u/4 a,..l a r c.,:G.�Gt.44 TTrLBTOTUEPIUMAR YBROUS)CIO:CKWMITTIE ar AYPP(PRUT•L CITY OR COUNTY PLAN?inn llUVARTULLROT To YSR:FY APPROVHD UM AND TO SIOTKRMINU ANY 1,'M114 ON -1 tf ms Qua_,.. 1AIYBCUf8AO/UN BrFARM:NOURFOREBTDRACTicE1A01AD1l00U 0JLMAAMIRA IN 0111130.01 EITATS GrO04i91144 Coa.•rtyof��j�"^'1N.... _ �1� '[1rthMrwiwntwul7/1.4. i d iC�siI illllr'�: 1F ' .ate PA Of ��/// r`112 ) t5.vh 11 I NdW 1j;1 b T-t44.PIr!/N TPA r-+r My oo gxlaAOn WIMP _y_ r,1/47/ LU CI1CM701li.E fa For CORN!OF D CON r4'�t4'n,i-oa� NAG'iEGOrDE D Tx19INSTRUMENTAB ANACCCRt- rf �•,,,1„n.._S,prd� OOAlONOtRYANDABSUknaNOU.IADn,r FOR Irttt4w,►at±' ,= OF, TIT HE PRESENTTHAi CHEAT 'RE EBIATE O Y IN PIU1.PROPERTY • • • • YIkNGI IT PUFPOi1T9 TO CFtiATE, S.Chandra-WS:1999 99073286 1 C)f'4 1 XII I t 19' "A" Desoripticn, 2N0 AMENDED LISCAL DESCRIPTION A tract of land in the Southwest one-quarter of Section 2, Township 3 South, Mange 1 West of the Willamette Meridian, in the City of Tigard County of Washington and State of Oregon, dssoribed as follows; Beginning at the Northeasterly corner of that property deeded to .Ale ander J. fluty And Pauline E. Lnty and described in Rook 355, Ph90 74 of the Dead Accords of Washington County, said point of beginning being North 97'48'40" Unit 283,23 fetes from a two inch i't0n pipe Carttrn the Initial point of MHGROS2, a plat of record, paid point also being on the Northwesterly boundary of the relocated West Side iuoifi,o Highwa (Oregon State Highway' 49, Went); thence North 33'15'17" East along the Northwesterly >}oondary Of said Pacific Highway MOO feet to the true point of beginning; thenao North 56'44'43" West, :40.00 feet; thence North 93'15'1'1" East 181.19 toot; thence North 56'44'43' Weet, 28,00 feet; thenou North 33'19'17" East, 68.00 feet; Cheney South 59'44'43" Enat, 168,00 foot to the Porthwaatorly right of way of said 1,acifio Highway thanoo South 33'15'17" Went, along seid right of way 249, 15 feet to the point of beginning. T0t7BPHBR WITH an easement for ingrain; end e(reas, said uara,nant is described as follows; A tract of land in the Southwest one-quarter of Section 3, Township 2 13auth, Range 1 west of the Willamette Meridian, in the City of Tigard County of Washington and State of Oregon. Beginning at the northeasterly oornor of the above described tract; thence .forth 56'44'43' West, 168.00 feet; thence South 33'15'17' West 66.00 feat; thence North 56'44141" Weut, 13.00 font; thence north 33'15'17' East, 66.00 feet; thence South 56'44'43' Eaet, I80.00 feet to the Northwusttnrly right of way of said Pacific Highway; thence South 33'13'17' West, along said right -of way 20.00 feet, more or less, to the point of beginning, ALSO TOGETHER WITH an sasanert for ingress and egress described as ;0;104'9 s Situate in the Southwnat one-quarter of Section 2, 'Township 2 South, Range 1 West of the Willametto Meridian, in the City of Tigard, County of Washington and State of Oregon, and being nonoribed as follows; Beginning at a point on the West right-of-way lino of eaoifio Highway (0.8, Highway 99W), said point }wing South 00'01'10" East a disttnae of 697.57 feet, South C0'00'13" Beet a distance of 607.67 feat, North 59'48'124 Sane a distance of 263.23 feet, end North 33'15'17" Mast Catod Norombor 30, 1993 Page 2 26374336 L S.Chandra-WS:1999 99073286 2 or lem a aiatanau or 85,05 foot from the Wait ore-quarter corner of maid Section 2, laid point ale,o being the Sauthoaut coru„r of that porcol reworded is Fee No. 78-41342 and running thence South 33'15' 17' +Jost on the aforementioned West right-of-way lino a distance of $1.00 Raet1 thence leaving said Walt right-of-way lino and running North 36'44'43" Neat d distance of 44.C7 feat; thenoo North 00'1,'40' Nowt a diatanoe of 61.07 foot to a point on the South lino of said Faa No. 76-41342; thongs South 56'46146" k:aet on &laid South lino a diatanoo of 77,09 toot to the point of beginning, FURTHER TOGETHER WITH an easement for a private sanitary sewer line deeterirod as tollm41 'Situatq in the Southwest one-auartey of Seoci.on 2, Township 2 South, Range I W4at of the Willamette meridian, in the City of Tigard, County of Wauhington and State of Oregon, and Laing a portion of that peroal doeoril;ed in Document Ng. 80-2967, Washington County Hook of Ricardo as surveyed by County Survey No. 21,806 and lying 7.9 Cart on aaoh Aide of the following doaoribod uonterlina, Camaanoiug at thu Northerly Noxthwoat corner of the public' Storage ' property as surveyed by said County Uurvey No, 21,8381 thong° slang the North lino of the luhlic Storage property and the South line of Kee No. 70-8792, North 69'00'25' &out a diatanoe of 322.04 foot; thonao South 14'26'00° Wont a diatanoo of 110.95 foot to a point on the East line of said Publio 8toraya parcel and the west lino of Fee No. 80-2867 and the true point of beginning of the aforomentioned contorlinei thane South 14'28'00' £oat a diatanoe of 29.64 feet to a point on the Southwesterly lino of said Fee No, 80-2857 and point of termination of said centerline. The side lines to ho lengthened or shortened to begin and end on the boundary line of acid Yoe ho. 80-26t7. FURTHER TOGETHER WITH an easement for a private sanitary salver lino deucribed as folloug: Situate in the southweat ono-quarter of Section 2, Township 2 South, Rango 1 Welt of the Willamette Meridian, in the City of Tigard, County of Washington and State of Oregon, and being a portion of the Public' Storage property as surveyed by County Survey No. 21,556 and. lying 7.5 coot on each side of the following dacoribod oentarline: Beginning at a point on the Forth line of the Public Storage pro arty and the South lino of Foe No, 79-8792, said point being North 89 06'25' Seat a distance of 322.04 feet from the Northerly Worthweot corner of said public Storage parcel and running thence South 14`18'00" Wost a diatanoa of 110.99 feet to the end thereof, said point being on thu Bast fine of 441d Public 3torcga peroal and the Neat line of Fee No. 80-2867. The side linos to be lengthened or ehortcnod to begin on the said North Line and terminate on the paid East line. And eo deaoribrd nit Dated November 30, 1993 Page 3 26374331 . ..•vkiiy.• • • S,Chandra-WS:1999 99073286 3 (.4,1 CO am Y1 Situate in the southweut one-quarter of aaotion 2, Township 2 Booth, Rangs 1 Wept of tho Willamette Floridian, in tho City of Tigard, County of Wa nhington and 8tatu of Orogon, and being MOO feet Vida and lying 1.50 test on each tide of the following described centerline' Beginning at a point which is South 19'3Or00" West a distance of 20,00 feet and North 79'3I1"00" wont a dietaroo of 7.34 feat from the Narthwel corner of that parcel described in Pea No 80-2847, and running thenea South il'30tOb" frost parallel and 7,30 feet Neoterly of the Wert line of said Pea N . 80.2887 a dietanoe of 123.83 feat to a point on the Northeasterly line of that parcel donor/Pod in Yee No. 78-41342, said point being South 96'44,43,, fast a distance of 6.10 foot iron the nest .Northerly Noxthweat• corner of Fee No. 78-41342. The side lines of .said strip to he ehortanod or Longthunad to terminate at the West . bonndRO of said Pee so. 79-41342. • • • Dated November 30, 1993 Page 4 2437433N )4 • • e S.Chandra-WS:1999 99073286 4 of 4 3. Revised Project Narrative: AUTOZONE STORE No. 3756 Submitted to the: Current Planning Division City of Tigard, Oregon 13125 SW Hall Blvd. Tigard, OR 97223 Cheryl Caines, Associate Planner cherylc@tigard-or.gov 503.639.4171 503.684.7297, fax Prepared for: AutoZone Store Development Department #8320 123 S. Front Street Memphis, TN 38103 Mitch Bramlitt, Contact m itc h.bramlitt @autozone.com 901.495.8714 901.495.8991, fax Prepared by: HDJ Design Group, PLLC 300 W 15th Street Vancouver, WA 98660 Tom Lonergan, Project Manager lonergant @hdjdesigngroup.com 360.695-3488 360.695-8767, fax General Information Applicant: AutoZone Store Development Department#8320 123 S. Front Street Memphis, TN 38103 Mitch Bramlitt, Contact Mitch.bramlitt(cautozone.com 901.495.8714 901.495.8991, fax Property Owner: Bar-Am, LLC 1416 3rd Avenue Seattle, WA 98101 Isaac Baruch, contact Project Contact: HDJ Design Group, PLLC 300 W. 15th Street Vancouver, WA 98660 Tom Lonergan, Project Manager lonergant @hdjdesigngroup.com 360.695.3488 360.695.8767, fax Project Location: The site is located in the southwest 1/4 of Section 2, Township 2 South, Range 1 West of the Willamette Meridian. More specifically, the site is identified as parcel number 2S1 02CB-01802. Project Area: The project area encompasses approximately .84 acres and consists of one existing tax parcel. Zoning: C-G, General Retail AutoZone Store No.5658 1 PRE2009-00029 Site Description and Location The proposed AutoZone site is located on a lot approximately .84 acres (36,791sf+/-) in size. The site is located in the Southwest 'A of Section 2, Township 2S, Range 1W or the Willamette Meridian. More specifically,the subject site is located at 13405 SW Pacific Highway,within the jurisdictional boundaries of Tigard,Oregon. The site is comprised of one(1)existing tax parcel, numbered 2S 102CB-01802. The subject lot is currently improved with a 3,500sf building, which will be removed prior to construction. Surrounding uses include: a storage facility to the west and southwest; fast food restaurant to the north;and,general retail uses to the east,across SW Pacific Highway. Staff encouraged this application to work with Tri-Met in relation to a bus stop along the site's 7 / street frontage. However, after HDJ staff initiated contact with Tri-Met staff on December 9, 2009,and received no response. Therefore,no upgrades are proposed with this application. T, Proposal Summary The applicant is proposing a 6,800sf auto parts related retail business at the subject site. Site improvements include the new building,Mr-parking spaces and associated landscaping. And, per Table 18.520.1 TMC, `Sales-Oriented Gihtral Retail'uses are permitted outright in the General Commercial District. Code Compliance Discussion TMC Title 18, Community Development Code Land Use Decisions (TMC 18.300): A request for pre-application conference was submitted on September 10, 2009, and the meeting was subsequently held September 22, 2009 with city staff. According to discussion at the conference and in notes provided by staff, this application respectfully submits a Type II application in conformance with Section 18.360 for approval of the proposed retail development. At this time, there are no requests for exception to any standard contained within Tigard's Community Development Code associated with the proposed retail development. This application does not constitute a major or minor modification of an existing approved plan or development and is not being proposed in phases. AutoZone will procure and/or pay any required license fees,assurances,and taxes as required. A neighborhood meeting for the subject development was scheduled for November 11,2009 from 6pm to 8pm. Notice for the meeting was posted at the site and notices were mailed to neighbors as prescribed in the `Neighborhood Meeting Process' handout on October 28, 2009. The `Affidavit of Mailing/Posting', sign in sheet and meeting notes are all included with this submission package. AutoZone Store No.5658 2 PRE2009-00029 A Traffic Impact Analysis (TIA) was not required for this application. The redevelopment and new use will reduce the number trips generated to and from subject site. `/ The proposed development meets approval criteria contained in Section 18.360.090 TMC as: • this application is in compliance with all applicable requirements of Title 18 TMC; • the site has been designed so that the proposed building is so located to preserve existing trees,topography and natural drainage where possible, located to provide adequate distance and oriented with consideration for sun and wind; • the site layout is proposed in order to provide a safe environment for employees and patron's alike. The parking lot is visually accessible from most points in the proposed building and from Highway 99; • all mechanical and HVAC equipment will be stored on the roof-top,and screened by parapets; • exterior lighting will be provided as required for crime deterrence, and in all on- site pedestrian areas. Lighting will overlap at a height of seven feet as required; • all landscaping has been designed in accordance with Chapter 18.745; • this application proposes 23% landscaping for the gross parking, loading and services areas; • 15% landscaping for the overall site area; • drainage plans have been design in accordance with criteria adopted in the 1981 master drainage plan; • accessible facilities have been design in accordance with requirements set forth in ORS Chapter 447; • all provisions and regulations set forth for the C-G zone, in Chapter 18.520 TMC. Development criteria which do not apply to this project include: • locational criterion related to ground slumping or sliding; • locational criterion related to adjoining buildings; • methods of site hydrology relating y gv t g to habitat; • exterior elevations related to residential construction; • buffering and screening for neighboring uses with different types of land use; • outdoor and recreational use related to residential development; and, • development within or adjacent to the 100-year floodplain. Land Division(TMC 18.400): There are no requests for land division actions associated with this application. Therefore,this chapter will not apply. Zoning Districts (TMC 18.500): 18.520 TMC—Commercial Zoning Districts The subject site is zoned C-G for general commercial uses. And, according to Table 18.520.1, general `sales-oriented' retail uses are allowed outright in this district. This application does not include any requests for approval of any accessory structures. AutoZone Store No.5658 3 PRE2009-00029 According to Table 18.520.2, Development standards within the General Commercial district are as follows: Standard Required Proposed Minimum Lot Size None .84 acres Maximum Lot Width 50 feet 249 feet Minimum Setbacks: - Front Yard 0 feet 52 feet - Side facing street on corner& n/a n/a through lots - Side yard 0 feet 62 feet - Side or rear yard abutting more n/a n/a restrictive zoning district - Rear Yard 0 feet 4 feet - Distance between front of garage& n/a n/a property line abutting a public or private street. Minimum Building Height n/a n/a Maximum Building Height 45 feet 21 feet Maximum Site Coverage' 85% 85% Minimum Landscape Requirement 15% 15% Minimum FAR n/a Minimum Residential Density n/a (Maximum Residential Density I n/a Includes all buildings and impervious surfaces. As portrayed in the table above, all applicable development standards intended for uses within the C-G zoning district are met with the application. Please refer to the development plans included with this submission package. Additionally, within the C-G district, there are no: Special Limitation on Uses; Additional Development and/or Design Guidelines; or, Interim Requirements. Therefore, as discussed herein,the provisions of this section are met with this proposal. Community Plan Area Standards(TMC 18.600) As the proposed development is not located within a City of Tigard designated `Plan Area', the provisions of this chapter will not apply. Specific Development Standards(TMC 18.700) 18.705 TMC—Access,Egress, and Circulation. All public areas will be maintained as portrayed on the site development plan included with this application. Table 18.705.3 TMC indicates requirements for a single driveway, a minimum of 30-feet in width, with 24-inch curbs for commercial and industrial uses having 0-99 required parking AutoZone Store No.5658 4 PRE2009-00029 spaces. Therefore, with a maximum requirement of 36 parking spaces, this development is required to provide one(1)driveway. The proposed retail site will have two (2) access points, via shared driveways. The shared driveways have direct access to/from SW Pacific Highway, which fronts the subject property. The site has a minimum access width of 32 feet. No changes to the existing drive way accesses are proposed with this application. Pedestrian access from the proposed building to the public right-of-way is provided via an 8-foot wide walkway. The crossing will be paved and constructed of asphalt and striped in accordance with ADA standards and criteria noted in 18.705.030.F.3 TMC. All proposed parking lot lighting will meet minimum standards in all ADA. Additionally, perimeter and parking lot landscaping will be provided as prescribed in Chapter 18.745,discussed below. V There aren't any hazardous traffic conditions associated with this site or application that require referral to the Commission for review. All access to Highway 99 will be via a existing shared driveways, and in no way will any backward movement or maneuvering of vehicles occur within the public right-of-way. 18.710 TMC—Accessory Residential Units. There are no residential uses proposed with this development. Therefore this section will not apply. 18.715 TMC—Density Computations. There are no residential uses proposed with this development. Therefore this section will not apply. 18.720 TMC—Design Compatibility Standards. There are no residential uses proposed with this development. Therefore this section will not apply. L/18.725 TMC—Environmental Performance Standards. Y Noise—There are retail activities proposed to take place outside the proposed building. All retail activities will take place inside, and it is not likely that there will be `plainly audible' or `unnecessarily loud' noises which exceed the measurable limits of 40 dB (decibels) during evening hours, 9pm to 7am, or 50 dB (decibels) during daytime hours, 7am to 9pm emanating from the subject site or proposed use. Regular vehicular and traffic noise may be created by the development, as allowed per section 7.40.180.G. And, construction of the proposed retail site will create some additional, temporary noise. Noise from the temporary disturbance will be mitigated through adherence to the City's current guidelines related to construction hours. Visible Emissions — This application is for a retail development, therefore will be no `visible emissions' such as steam or other point-source emissions associated with this application. AutoZone Store No.5658 5 PRE2009-00029 V Vibration —this application is for a retail development, therefore no vibration, other than those - , caused by vehicle traffic along Highway 99 will be caused by this development. Odors — this application is for a retail development, therefore there will be no emissions or odorous gases or other matters associated with this development. 18.730 TMC—Exceptions to Development Standards. There are no requests for exception from standard development criteria associated with this development. Therefore this section will not apply. 18.740 TMC—Historic Overlay. This site is not considered an historic site or area; cultural site or area, or landmark. Therefore, this section will not apply. 18.742 TMC—Home Occupations. There are no requests for home occupation license associated with this application. Therefore, this section will not apply. 18.745 TMC—Landscaping and Screening. ✓ Applicability The requirements of Chapter 18.745 TMC apply to this site development project. General Provisions The project shall meet the following general provisions below as shown in the associated landscape plans: 1. The owner,tenant and his agent, if any, shall be jointly and severally responsible for the maintenance of all landscaping and screening which shall be maintained in good condition so as to present a healthy,neat and orderly appearance,shall be replaced or repaired as necessary,and shall be kept free from refuse and debris. 2. All plant growth in landscaped areas of developments shall be controlled by pruning., trimming or otherwise so that: a. It will not interfere with the maintenance or repair of any public utility b. It will not restrict pedestrian or vehicular access c. It will not constitute a traffic hazard because of reduced visibility. 3. Certificates of occupancy shall not be issued unless the landscaping requirements have been met or other arrangements have been made and approved by the City of Tigard such as to posting of a bond. 4. Appropriate methods for the care and maintenance of street trees and landscaping materials shall be provided by the owner of the property abutting the rights-of-way unless otherwise required for emergency conditions and the safety of the general public. 5. No trees, shrubs or plantings more than 18" in height shall be planting in public right-of- way abutting roadways having no established curb and gutter. / 18.754.040 Street Trees V Koelreuteria paniculata(Goldenrain Tree)are proposed at a spacing of approximately 25' on center. The tree will reach a mature height of approximately 25',with equal to slightly greater spread. The trees will not interfere with any overhead power lines and have been planted at least AutoZone Store No.5658 6 PRE2009-00029 2-feet from any face of curb or other permanent hard,paved surface. No trees are proposed within 20-feet of an existing light pole and there are no new light poles proposed within 20-feet of an existing street tree. Additionally,the tree nearest the signalized intersection at the southerly access meets the minimum 20-foot spacing requirement. There are no tree wells existing or proposed on site so no utilities can be installed in tree wells. The street trees shall be pruned to provide at least 8-feet of clearance over the sidewalks and 13- feet over local streets; 15-feet over collector streets;and 18 feet above arterial streets. There are no existing street trees to remain that will have cut and fill activity around them. There are no existing street trees that will be removed and require replacement. This meets the requirements of the development code,so there will be not need to request an adjustment of the requirements. See associated landscape plans for street tree locations. 18.745.050 Buffering and Screening 18.745.050.B.5 -Buffering and screening has been provided along the property lines with which the parking lot and service facilities are adjacent. The buffering consists of a combination shrubs that will reach a minimum mature height of four feet and a three foot height screen wall. The buffering and screening also consists of trees and live groundcover. 18.745.050.E.1 —The parking area is screen from view using a combination of shrubs and decorative walls. The landscape material for the parking area consists of a balance between low lying and vertical shrubs and trees. Trees are equally distributed throughout the parking lot at a minimum of one tree per seven parking stalls. The landscape islands in the parking lot are all a minimum of three feet in dimension and have curbs to protect the landscape from vehicles. 18.745.050.E.2-The refuse container and disposal area will be screened from the public street using a combination of a decorative masonry block wall and landscape. The air conditioners will i, be place on the building roof and be screen by parapets. The gas meter will be place along the side of the building and be screened from the public street with shrubs planted along the right-of- way. 18.745.050.E.4-The refuse container and disposal area will be screened from the public street V using a combination of a decorative masonry block wall and landscape. All which meet the requirements of this section. Re-vegetation All portions of the site currently containing vegetation are affected by the landscaping requirements for the project. As part of this project,as many existing trees as possible will be retained. All other vegetation is proposed for removal and replacement with landscape plantings that meet the requirements of the City of Tigard Development Code. 18.750 TMC—Manufactured/Mobile Home Regulations. There are no manufactured structures proposed in conjunction with this application. Therefore, this section will not apply. 18.755 TMC—Mixed Solid Waste and Recyclable Storage. Retail uses are required to provide a minimum storage area of 10sf plus 10 square feet for each 1,000sf of gross floor area. With approximately 6,786sf of retail space proposed, the required AutoZone Store No.5658 7 PRE2009-00029 storage space solid waste and recyclables is 80 square feet. The applicant proposes a trash enclosure at 240sf(12' x 20'),which meets this requirement. In compliance with Section 18.755.050 TMC, which relates to location, design and access standards, the proposed enclosure is not located abutting any public roadway or front yard setbacks,and will not require any backing movements into a public right-of-way. The storage area is sight obscuring at 6-feet and will be constructed of a masonry block. 18.760 TMC—Nonconforming Situations. There are no nonconforming uses associated with this development. Therefore,this section will not apply. 18.765 TMC—Off-Street Parking and Loading Requirements. v All proposed parking for this development is located within 500 feet of the structure, with ADA spaces located nearest the main entrance. There is no proposal for joint parking associated with this application. And,the parking lot will kept in clean and good repair at all times. ✓ Access to the proposed development will be provided via two (2) existing paved driveways near the northerly and southerly boundaries of the subject site. The existing southerly access is 37.75 feet in width and the existing northerly access is 38.75 feet in width. As the proposed development is required to provide fewer than 99 parking spaces,only one(1)access,a minimum width of 30-feet is required. No changes to the existing shared access points are proposed with this development. And, as all access to Highway 99 will be via the existing shared driveways, in no way will any backward movement or maneuvering of vehicles occur within the public right- of-way. No curb cuts are proposed with this development. Vision clearance triangles,meeting criteria contained in section 18.795.030 TMC are provided on sheet C5.0 of the preliminary plan set,and include triangles, with 35-foot legs, and un-obstructed area. ✓ No drive-thru uses are proposed with this development, therefore `on-site vehicle stacking' criteria shall not apply. The subject site is located within Zone A which prescribes a minimum parking requirement of 3.7 parking spaces per 1,000sf of floor area, and a maximum requirement of 5.1 parking spaces per 1,000sf of floor area. Therefore,this application is required to provide at least 26 parking spaces, and not more than 36 parking spaces. This application proposes 32 parking spaces. Of those, two (2) are proposed to meet ADA requirements for accessible parking. Further, the parking lot has been designed with standard spaces, having minimum dimensions of 8.5' x 18.5 feet, wheel stops, and drive aisles meeting the 24-foot minimum width, have been provided as required. Parking lot striping will be provided in accordance with this narrative and sheet SP 1.0 of the preliminary plan set. Please refer to the Preliminary Site Development plan which portrays compliance with these criteria. AutoZone Store No.5658 8 PRE2009-00029 Bicycle parking for general retail uses is to be provided at a rate of.3 spaces per 1,000sf of floor area. For this development, 2 bicycle parking spaces are required. Two (2) bicycle parking V spaces are proposed and will be provided near the loading area. The spaces are located outside of any parking aisles, and landscape or pedestrian areas. Please refer to Sheet SP1.0 of the Preliminary Plan Set which portrays the location and rack details. ✓ Off-street loading requirements contained within section 18.765.080, prescribe one (1) loading space for building with 10,000sf gross square feet. The proposed building has only 6,786sf. Therefore, this criterion will not apply. However, a loading area is provided near the northwest corner of the building. Parking lot landscaping will be provided as prescribed in Chapter 18.745, discussed above. 18.775 TMC—Sensitive Lands. There are no known sensitive lands on or near the subject site. Therefore, this section will not apply. 18.780 TMC—Signs. There are no applications for sign permit included with this submission. Therefore, this section will not apply. 18.785 TMC— Temporary Uses. There are no temporary uses associated with this application. Therefore, this section will not apply. 18.790 TMC— Tree Removal. Tree Plan Requirement A tree plan has been prepared that meets the requirements of section 18.790.030. An arborist report and associated plans have been submitted as part of the preliminary application package. Permit Applicability Per section 18.790.050,no tree removal permit shall be required as none of the trees being removed are located on sensitive land areas. Additionally,tree removal will not have any measurable negative impact on erosion, soil stability,flow of surface waters or water quality. 18.795 TMC— Visual Clearance Areas. As portrayed in the preliminary development plan (sheet C5.0), vision clearance areas are portrayed with a minimum of 35' on each side of the driveway. The development, as proposed, meets vision clearance criterion. 18.798 TMC— Wireless Communication Facilities. There are no wireless communications facilities associated with this application. Therefore, this section will not apply. Street and Utility Improvement Standards—(TMC 18.800) AutoZone Store No.5658 9 PRE2009-00029 Streets The subject site currently has frontage on SW Pacific Highway (a 4-lane major arterial). The SW Pacific Highway frontage currently is improved and has a full access signalized driveway to the proposed site and the parcel to the south. There is also a full access driveway to the proposed site on the north. This project proposes dedicate 12 feet of additional right-of-way across the frontage and construct a 10-foot wide sidewalk across the frontage. All site access will be achieved via two driveways off of SW Pacific Highway. No other improvements are proposed or required for SW Pacific Highway. Sewer Availability Clean Water Services is the sanitary sewer purveyor for the site. There is existing 6-inch sewer lateral serving the existing structure.A connection to the existing lateral is proposed. Stormwater Drainage Oregon Department of Transportation(ODOT)will be the lead agency for review and approval of the development's stormwater system. Currently, the subject site is developed, with paved parking and drives that send stormwater runoff draining to a conveyance system located within SW Pacific Highway. The new storm system will provide treatment for all stormwater runoff generated on new driving and parking surfaces by the proposed commercial development. The redeveloped site will utilize the parking area for detention of runoff to match the existing conditions. Prior to construction, a stormwater control plan prepared by a licensed engineer will be submitted to the ODOT for approval. The stormwater plan will make use of the Best Management Practices (BMPs) as identified by the ODOT and Clean Water Services. Measures to reduce or control surface water runoff and runoff water impacts include on-site stormwater collection,conveyance, treatment and detention. Water Availability The City of Tigard is the water purveyor for the site. The subject site currently has a 2" water service lateral and meter. There is an existing fire hydrant on the north access drive to the site. The proposed redevelopment occupancy is not be required to have a fire suppression system and none is being proposed. The new building will utilize the existing 2-inch water service. Project Impacts Analysis Transportation Impacts to the City's transportation system will be minimal. The `Rate Calculation Worksheet' prepared by City Staff has assigned ITE use codes for the prior use(933 —Fast Food Restaurant w/o drive-through)and proposed use(843 —Auto Parts Sales), which will result in an overall trip reduction of approximately 2,430 daily trips. 933 Fast Food Restaurant w/o drive-thru f 716 3,500sf 2,864 AutoZone Store No.5658 10 PRE2009-00029 843 Auto Parts Sales 61.91 6,800sf 434 ADT -2430 ADT As portrayed in the table above, the proposed use will result in a reduction in overall transportation impacts. This application is however,proposing an additional 10-foot right-of-way dedication, and construction of new sidewalk and landscape strip along the properties frontage, in compliance with current development standards. Bikeways There are no changes proposed to the existing bikeway system located along the project's frontage, adjacent to Highway 99. And, as required in section 18.765, two (2) bicycle parking spaces will be provided on site. Based on the findings above, no mitigation measures are proposed with this development relating to the existing transportation system. Drainage System The proposed re-development will be constructed on an historically commercial site. Therefore, no additional impervious surfaces will be created with this development. This application has provided updated plans for stormwater treatment (collection, conveyance, treatment and detention), which have been submitted to ODOT (Oregon Department of Transportation) for design approval. The plans provide for the use of Best Management Practices as identified by ODOT and Clean Water Services. Based on the findings above, no additional mitigation measures are proposed with this development relating to the site's drainage system. Parks The proposed development is for a commercial retail use. There are no impacts to the city's parks facilities anticipated with this application. Therefore, no mitigation measures are proposed with this development. Water The subject site receives public water service, City of Tigard purveyor. This application will utilize the existing service lateral and meter, and will require significantly less water than the previous tenant. No additional mitigation measures are proposed with this application. Sewer The subject site is connected to existing sanitary service, Clean Water Services purveyor. This application will utilize the existing 6-inch sewer lateral, which serves the existing structure. The proposed use will require significantly less sanitary service than the previous tenant,therefore no additional mitigation measures are proposed with this application. Noise This application proposes an auto-related retail business, with all business-related activities occurring within the proposed building. There are no `noise-sensitive units' adjacent to the proposed development, and it is not likely that there will be `plainly audible' or `unnecessarily loud' noises which exceed the measurable limits of 40 dB (decibels) during evening hours, 9pm AutoZone Store No.5658 I 1 PRE2009-00029 to dam or SO d 8(decibels)during daytime hours, 7a to 9 Pm e mana ti n g from the subject ublect sie or r°Posed nse Re � hicul and °lse maY b created the development,. °ns uin o tpr Pd el ate s fiYaZ�f NOjse ot o dae Fill mitigthC,City's guidelines,ced tors construction hOUr s.�Summa As pbed in the above anatysis, any additional nPacts to Ci� ses related t s ve efieWl � iti ga t ed throe ompliance Ch Services to this non-codified mitigation measures are rec°mme fed°r proposed, • -9utoZ p2e Store No S '00029 658 12 Neighborhood Meeting Documents Included herein: Meeting Notice, Affidavit of Posting and Mailing, Sign in Sheet, Meeting Minutes, and Meeting Handout.. NOTICE OF PROPOSED DEVELOPMENT APPLICATION AND NEIGHBORHOOD MEETING THIS NOTICE CONTAINS INFORMATION THAT MAY AFFECT YOUR PROPERTY OCTOBER 28,2009 AUTOZONE—STORE #5658 Dear Interested Party: HDJ DESIGN GROUP,PLLC (HDJ) is representing AutoZone, the owner of property located at 13405 SW Pacific Highway, Tigard OR, also known as parcel number R994507 (Tax Lot 2S102DB01802), located in the SW '/4 of Section 2, Township 2S, Range 1W, W.M. The proposed development is required to be approved through the City of Tigard's Type II Site Development Review process. The applicant proposes a 6,800sf auto-related retail business at the subject site. Sight improvements include a new building,30 parking spaces and associated landscaping. Prior to applying to the City of Tigard for the necessary land use approvals, HDJ planners and engineers will be available to discuss the proposal in more detail with interested parties, neighboring property owners and residents. Please note that this will be an informational meeting on preliminary plans. These plans may be altered prior to the submittal of the application to the city. MEETING INFORMATION Public comments and discussion are welcome at the community meeting to be held at the following time and location: Wednesday, November 11, 2009 from 6pm to 8pm Tigard Grange 13770 SW Pacific Highway Tigard,OR 97223 CONTACT INFORMATION HDJ DESIGN GROUP,PLLC Andy Nuttbrock,Project Manager 300 W 15th Street Vancouver, WA 98660-2927 (360)695-3488 nuttbrockaa hdj des ignsroup.com 1 ir alt. or ,i Area Notified (500 Ft) a #400' #, 147' DERRY DELL CT r^ � ' z ': AutoZone Q■ 2S102CB 01802 3 ' . C s gtsivorm • :::::....:::„.... mu:::::.:.,- ,..--:.:::-. ..... .. . . ... G. ' . /3 cc, _____.‘ PARK ST �,� 011 COOK LN , . 11111 1", .' Subject Site / 1 f Property owner information is valid' ii ••-•••- .......M. 14 4 40 : !;:..;:.....i::..:7: milli i . for 3 months from the date printed on FAIRHAVEN ST . this map. VI'::::::::::::•:•:•:-:•:•:•:•:.:.::::::::::::::::::.:.:.:.:.:.... .-.:::::::::::::::.:.:.:.:.:....:.. 0101 .40**. ..:::::::::::::::.:.::::::::::::::::::::::... ......::::::::::::::::::::::::„.......„.... ................................ Me Printed 10/271 009 FAIR" c,�� 1 Map 2 Informalian on this map is for general location only and should be verged with the Development %11116. Services Division. Alhi •. 111116111 itz AIE. C DATA IS DERIVED FROM MULTIPLE SOURCES.THE CITY OF TIGARD II ." WNES NOT WARRANTY REPRESENTATION.OR GUARANTEE AS TO THE . C ONTENT.ACCURACY TIMELINESS OR COMPLETENESS OF ANY OF THE DATA PROVIDED HEREIN.THE CM OF TIGARD SHALL ACI ME NO THE U6AfiINFO FORAM'ERRORS,OMYSSIONS,OR INACCURACIES IN THE Inippo. INFORMATION PROVIDED REDLESS OF HOW CSED.HILLVIEW ST , COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT • = W W S - Q •� �- City of Tigard Elf •i'U . I1{� pips,® i.,G `D A�I'S i_IlliglO . "I A AFFIDAVIT OF MAILING/POSTING NEIGHBORHOOD MEETING NOTICE IMPORTANT NOTICE: THE APPLICANT IS REQUIRED TO MAIL THE CITY OF TIGARD A COPY OF THE NEIGHBORHOOD MEETING NOTICE THAT PERTAINS TO THEIS AFFIDAVIT AT THE SAME TIME PROPERTY OWNERS ARE MAILED NOTICE, TO THE ADDRESS BELOW: City of Tigard Planning Division 13125 SW Hall Boulevard Tigard,OR 97223-8189 IN ADDITION,THE APPLICANT SHALL SUBMIT THIS AFFIDAVIT&COPIES OF ALL NOTICES AT THE TIME OF APPLICATION. MAILING: I,Amy Wooten,being duly sworn,depose and say that on the 29`h day of October,2009, I caused to have mailed to each of the persons on the attached list, a notice of a meeting to discuss a proposed development at (or near) 13405 SW Pacific Highway, a copy of which notice so mailed is attached hereto and made a part of hereof. I further state that said notcies were enclosed in envelopes plainly addressed to said persons and were deposited on the date indicated above in the United States Post Office located at 1211 Daniels Street, Vancouver WA 98660-2911 with postage prepaid thereon. Signature the presence of a Notary Public) POSTING: I,Karen Olson,do affirm that I represent the party initiating interest in a proposed land use application for AutoZone affecting the land located at 13405 SW Pacific Highway,also known as parcel number R994507(Tax Lot 2S 102DB01802),and did on the 29th day of October,2009 personally post notice indicating that the site may be proposed for a Type II land use application,and the time,date and place of a neighborhood meeting to discuss the proposal. The sign was posted in the landscape strip near the bus stop along NE Highway 99,at the subejct location(13405 SW Pacific Highway). Signature(In the presence of a Notary Public) (THIS SECTION FOR A STATE OF WASHINGTON,NOTARY PUBLIC TO COMPLETE/NOTARIZE) STATE OF Washington ) :.•'�'(f�;... ?4,9• . ♦ S10N .F County of Clark )ss. •-2- 4S O�o 4:)TAq�%O Subscribed and sworn/affirmed before me on the 29th day of October, 2009. 's ,v Y � UBL1G . ••.......•• 0/144:1 GIi C �, drtyASN�N ,s ARY PUB IC F WASHINGT IN -1VIy Commission Expires: AUTOZONE STORE#5658 NEIGHBORHOOD MEETING NOVEMBER 11,2008,6PM-8PM SIGN IN SHEET WOULD YOU LIKE TO RECEIVE A COPY OF THE NAME ADDRESS PHONE E-MAIL ADDRESS MEETING NOTES? Lino [ &w/-5 /7 (1/S- SW/Z/20 C‘ C, 503 Spa Srfl 1:4dalea/Acltar. p4cort Nv HDJ _J a DESIGN GROUP Memorandum PROJECT NUMBER PRE2009-00029 PROJECT NAME AutoZone TO: File FROM: Andy Nuttbrock, Project Manager Re: Notes for Community Meeting Meeting began at 6:10 pm November 11, 2009 Introductions were made: Andy Nuttbrock , HDJ Design Group Opening Statement was read: See attached document. There were no questions concerning opening statement. Design Presentation: There were no questions. Attendee thought the meeting was for a different property. Meeting was adjourned at 6:30 pm. engineers I landscape architects I planners I surveyors 16760 SW Upper Boones Ferry Rd.-Ste 103 - Portland,OR 97224-7696 - 503/924-4005 - 503/924-4366 fax WI \ \ • \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ ---'" \\ \ \ PUBLIC STORAGE \ �' 2 J 1:o E crs r.. i 85 v Y i 7 .7 d a ' (2)0 i <\\\ �,�''^\\\ i',/,' ——I— u CC I v :^ F.: zF J PROPOSED TRASH W t ENCLOSURE / 0 1"— — — PROPOSED }E-� I • LOADING AREA H II dry �:: `: PROPOSED - PROPOSED AUTOZONE •,- 4 co PUBLIC STORAGE t.-..1.:.-, - 6,786 SF •• •',.• 1 - . -- (0 a- \\\ \`\ ,'^\ ,�''':'.`,. _,_—_ — , '-•i: I ., PROPOSED BUILDING AREA 8,786 SF 20% \v.,' \ ��' \\ \ /� •9•¢.• — _ - 'I' ,.ryr---•., PROPOSED PARKING AREA 20,653 SF 61%• PROPOSED SIDEWALK AREA 1,228 SF 4% • \\ \Vi -•s•• - V • PROPOSED ii ■n • POPOSED LANDSCAPE AREA 5,138 SF 15% \ •..'` � `* = TACO BELL TOTAL SITE AREA 33801 SF O isi UP PROPOSED LANDSCAPE III ' A/ o ( ) .0/ ��\ � a I I ril , II \ Z ,lit F....''' ,:..,:..7,:.,..,..:,....,..:.....:. n i CO 1 co 1 \ 4 F — 4 i ,:------ ..___-_._. _—__..______...-----....__.___. SW PACIFIC HIGHWAY -.---__-_.__"__-_._____._-.__._ -- Qui - ------ _��_ _._...___....__..._._........_ ___=�_ .._. __ ___ Z I 1 - -r W is 0 - .• II Y — • • 0 t I I+' . , / I •`\ O V �A'± ■ • t DESIGNEI I 1 I il' \.. NIA ORANM...--; / MPA 1 ENTRANCE s `DRIVE ; , ✓� CHECCKS JAN SCALE H:1"=10' Sale 1•_20' V N!A =10 0 2 NOV2,9■ 3050-m SHEET 1 D. Clean Water Services Provider Letter • ' • v Clean Water Services File Number NOV 17 2009 CleanWater�Services I ' 0672 22 vv Sens tive Area Pre-Screening Site Assessment 1. WsdtCtliin 2. Property Information(example 1S234AB01400) 3. Owner Information Tax lot ID(s):25102CB 01802 Name:Isaac Baruch Company: Bar-Am,LLC Address:1416 3rd Avenue Site Address:13405 SW Pacific Highway City,State,Zip:Seattle,WA 98101 City,State,Zip:Tigard,OR 97223 Phone/Fax:206-624-63151206-464-0107 Nearest Cross Street:SW Park Street E-Mall: 4. Development Activity(check all that apply) S. Applicant information ❑" Addition to Single Family Residence(rooms,deck,garage) Name:Toni Lonergan ❑ Lot Line Adjustment ❑ Minor Land Partition Company:HDJ Design Group,LLC ❑ Residential Condominium ❑ Commercial Condominium Address•300 W 15th Street ❑ Residential Subdivision ❑ Commercial Subdivision City,State,Zip:Vancouver,WA 98660 ❑ Single Lot Commercial ❑ Multi Lot Commercial 360-695-3488/360-695-8767 Other Phone/Fax: E-Mail:lonergant @hdjdesigngroup.com 6. Will the project Involve any off-site work? ❑Yes No ❑Unknown Location and description of off-site work 7. Additional comments or information that may be needed to understand your project, Redevelopment of existing restaurant to a auto parts retail occupancy This application does NOT replace Grading and Erosion Control Permits,Connection Permits,Building Permits,Site Development Permits,DEQ 1200•C Permit or other permits as Issued by the Department of Environmental Quality,Department of State Lands and/or Department of the Army COE,All required permits and approvals must be obtained and completed under applicable local,state,and federal law. By signing this form,the Owner or Owner's authorized agent or representative,acknowledges and agrees that employees of Clean Water Services have authority to enter the project site at all reasonable times for the 4 urpose of inspecting project site conditions and gathering information related to the project site. i certify that I am familiar 'tit e information containid in this•• ument,and to the best of my knowledge and belief,this information is true,complete,and accurate, Print/Type Name I1•mas G,Lone!in Print/Type Title Project Engineer 11-17-09 Signature r---- !—•---� Date FOR DISTRICT USE ONLY ❑ Sensitive areas potentially exist on site or within 200'of the site.THE APPLICANT MUST PERFORM A SITE ASSESSMENT PRIOR TO ISSUANCE OF A SERVICE PROVIDER LETTER. If Sensitive Areas exist on the site or within 200 feet on adjacent properties,a Natural Resources Assessment Report may also be required. ❑ Based on review of the submitted materials and best available informatiion Sensitive areas do not appear to exist on site or within 200'of the site.This Sensitive Area Pre-Screening Site Assessment does NOT eliminate the need to evaluate and protectwater quality sensitive areas if they are subsequently discovered.This document will serve as your Service Provider letter as required by Resolution and Order 07-20, Section 3.02.1.All required permits and approvals must be obtained and completed under applicable local,State,and federal law. esed on review of the submitted materials and best available Information the above referenced projectvrill not significantly impact the existing or potentially sensitive area(s)found near The site This SensitiveArea Pre-Screening SleAssessment does NOT eliminate the need to evaluate and protect additional water quality sensitive areas if they are subsequently discovered.This document will serve as your Service Provider letter as required by Resolution and Order 07-20,Section 3.02.1.All required permits and approvals must be obtained and completed under applicable local,state and federal law. ❑This Service Provider Letter is notvaltd unless CWS approved site plan(s)are attached. ❑The proposed activl I t es not meet the defi • o plop . or the lot was platted after 9/9195 ORS 92.040(2). NO SIT ASSESSMENT OR I SERVICE PROVID''LETTER 1S REQUIR=r. y 4.4 �' ( - Date Reviewed by ;•0.1 2550 SW Hillsboro Ilighway • Hillsboro,Oregon 97123 • Phone:(503)681-5100 • Fax:(503}681-4439 • wvnv cleanwaterservices-oig 1 • Preliminary Site Distance Certification HDJDESIGN GROUP December 16, 2009 City of Tigard CD— Development Engineering 13125 SW Hall Blvd., Tigard, OR 97223 503-639-4171 Fax: 503-624-0752 http://www.tigard-or.gov Attn: Gus Duenas RE: Autozone Store #3756—Sight Distance Certification PRE200900029 This site has two existing accesses onto SW Pacific Highway, both of which will be maintained for the proposed project. The centerline of one of the existing accesses is located 31 feet to the south of the site's southern property line. The centerline of the other existing access is centered on the site's northern property line. It may be noted that the south access is controlled by an existing traffic signal and that the north access is unsignalized. The design speed for SW Pacific Highway is 40 mph in the vicinity of the site, based on the posted speed of 35 mph. As required by Tigard Development Code Section 18.705.030.H.1, sight distance shall meet standards set forth by the jurisdiction of the facility. SW Pacific Highway is an ODOT road, so sight distance must meet ODOT standards. ODOT standards use a 3.5 foot eye height and a 3.5 foot object height, and refer to AASHTO's "A Policy on Geometric Design of Highways and Streets" to determine sight distance minimums. Measurements are taken 15' back from the edge of the traveled way. Per AASHTO Case B1 —Left Turn from the Minor Road, longer time gaps are required for vehicles turning onto roads that are wider than two lanes. SW Pacific Highway has four lanes, plus a median lane, so 1 second was added to the required time gap, resulting in a longer required sight distance. As calculated, a sight distance of 500' is required, using the 40 mph design speed. Per AASHTO Case B2 — Right Turn from the Minor Road, Exhibit 9-57 may be used to determine minimum required sight distance, and a sight distance of 385' should be met for roads with 40 mph design speeds. At the north site access, sight distance was checked and determined to exceed the minimums stated above. For right turns, a sight distance of 385' feet was met and exceeded (to at least double the distance). For left turns, a sight distance of 500' was met and far exceeded, as well (to at least double the distance). At the south site access, the access is controlled by an existing traffic signal. Per AASHTO requirements at intersections with traffic signal control (Case D), the first vehicle stopped at the approach should be visible to engineers I landscape architects I planners ! surveyors 300 W 15th Street - Vancouver, WA 98660 - 360/695-3488 - 360/695-8767 fax HDJDESIGN GROUP the first vehicles stopped at the other approaches. This was checked and found to be true. Also, per AASHTO, left turning vehicles should have enough sight distance to select gaps in oncoming traffic. There appeared to be plenty of sight distance to see oncoming traffic. These are the only sight distance requirements mentioned by AASHTO for signalized intersections. However, sight distance was checked at the access for right turns, because right turns can be made on a red light. It appears that sight distance far exceeds the 385' minimum (to at least 1,000 feet or more). In conclusion, I hereby certify that the intersection sight distance at the existing accesses (which will be maintained in proposed conditions) conform to the requirements for sight distance set forth in the Tigard Development Code. Sincerely, HDJ Design Group, PLLC � y' PRO, ��GIN "cd 4258PE Karen Olson, EIT 01 EbON i2.04 CG EXPIRES: (.,-3 - ■ Approved By: Jeff Wise, PE, PTOE engineers ) landscape architects I planners ) surveyors 300 W 15th Street - Vancouver, WA 98660 - 360/695-3488 - 360/695-8767 fax Pre-Application Conference Notes Dated:September 22, 2009. CITY OF TIGARD PRE-APPLICATION CONFERENCE NOTES 11 • (Pre-Application Meeting Notes are Valid for Six (6) Months) TIGARD PRE-APP.MTG.DATE: — as-0 GI STAFF AT PRE-APP.: MC by NON-RESIDENTIAL APPLICANT: Auto Zone Development AGENT: Tom Lonegran—HDJ Design Phone: (901) 495-8714 Phone: (360) 695-3488 PROPERTY LOCATION: ADDRESS/GENERAL,LOCATION: 13405 SW P cific H TAX MAP(S)/LOT#(S): 9L,5 NECESSARY APPLICATIONS: Site Development Review(SDR) PROPOSAL DESCRIPTION: Demo existing restaurant building and redevelop the site with a 6,800 commercial structure for retail sales. COMPREHENSIVE PLAN MAP DESIGNATION: General Commercial ZONING MAP DESIGNATION: C-G ZONING DISTRICT DIMENSIONAL REQUIREMENTS (Refer to Code Section 18. 520) MINIMUM LOT SIZE: None sq. ft. Average Min. lot width: 50 ft. Max.building height: 45 ft. Setbacks: Front: 0 ft. Side: 0/20 ft. Rear:0/20 ft. Corner: -- ft. from street. MAXIMUM SITE COVERAGE: 85%. Minimum landscaped or natural vegetation area: 15%. ® NEIGHBORHOOD MEETING (Refer to the Neighborhood Meeting Handout) THE APPLICANT SHALL NOTIFY ALL PROPERTY OWNERS WITHIN 500 FEET, INTERESTED PARTIES, AND THE CITY OF TIGARD PLANNING DIVISION of their proposal. A minimum of two (2) weeks between the mailing date and the meeting date is required. Please review the Land Use Notification handout concerning site posting and the meeting notice. Meeting is to be held prior to submitting your application or the application will not be accepted. * NOTE: In order to also preliminarily address building code standards, a meeting with a Plans Examiner is encouraged prior to submittal of a land use application. ® NARRATIVE (Refer to Code Chapter 18.390) The APPLICANT SHALL SUBMIT A NARRATIVE which provides findings based on the applicable approval standards. Failure to provide a narrative or adequately address criteria would be reason to consider an application incomplete and delay review of the proposal. The applicant should review the code for applicable criteria. CITY OF TIGARD Pre Application Conference Notes Page 1 of 8 NON-Residential Application/Planning Division Section E IMPACT STUDY (Refer to lode Sections 18.390.040 and 18.390.050) As a part of the APPLICATION SUBMITTAL REQUIREMENTS, applicants are required to INCLUDE IMPACT STUDY with their submittal package. The impact study shall quantify the effect of the development on public facilities and services. The study shall address, at a minimum, the transportation system,including bikeways, the drainage system,the parks system,the water system,the sewer system and tie noise impacts of the development. For each public facility system and type of impact, the study shall propose improvements necessary to meet City standards, and to minimize the impact of the development on the public at large, public facilities systems, and affected private property users. In situations where the Community Development Code requires the dedication of real property interests, the applicant shall either specifically concur with the dedication requirement, or provide evidence which supports the conclusion that the real property dedication requirement is not roughly proportional to the projected impacts of the development. ® ACCESS (Refer to Chapters 18.705 and 18.765) Minimum number of accesses: 1 . Minimum access width: 30 ft. Minimum pavement width: 24 ft. All driveways and parking areas,except for some fleet storage parking areas,must be paved. Drive-in use queuing areas: N/A . N WALKWAY REQUIREMENTS (Refer to Code Section 18.705.030) WALKWAYS SHALL EXTEND FROM THE GROUND FLOOR ENTRANCES OR FROM THE GROUND FLOOR LANDING OF STAIRS, ramps, or elevators of all commercial, institutional, and industrial uses, to the streets which provide the required access and egress. Walkways shall provide convenient connections between buildings in multi-building commercial, institutional, and industrial complexes. Unless impractical, walkways should be constructed between a new development and neighboring developments. ❑ SPECIAL SETBACKS (Refer to Code Chapter 18.730) > STREETS: feet from the centerline of ➢ LOWER INTENSITY ZONES: feet,along the site's boundary. > FLAG LOT: 10-FOOT SIDE YARD SETBACK. ❑ SPECIAL BUILDING HEIGHT PROVISIONS (Refer to Code Section 18.730.010.B.) BUILDING HEIGHT EXCEPTIONS - Buildings located in a non-residential zone may be built to a height of 75 feet provided that: • A maximum building floor area to site area ratio (FAR) of 1.5 to 1 will exist; ► All actual building setbacks will be at least half('/z) of the building's height; and • The structure will not abut a residential zoned district. N BUFFERING AND SCREENING (Refer to Code Chapter 18.745) In order TO INCREASE PRIVACY AND TO EITHER REDUCE OR ELIMINATE ADVERSE NOISE OR VISUAL IMPACTS between adjacent developments, especially between different land uses, the City requires landscaped buffer areas along certain site perimeters. Required buffer areas are described by the Code in terms of width. Buffer areas must be occupied by a mixture of deciduous and evergreen trees and shrubs and must also achieve a balance between vertical and horizontal plantings. Site obscuring screens or fences may also be required; these are often advisable even if not required by the Code. The required buffer areas may only be occupied by vegetation, fences, utilities, and walkways. Additional information on required buffer area materials and sizes may be found in the Development Code. The ESTIMATED REQUIRED BUFFER WIDTHS applicable to your proposal area are: feet along north boundary. feet along east boundary. feet along south boundary. feet along west boundary. IN ADDITION,SIGHT OBSCURING SCREENING IS REQUIRED ALONG: service facilities,parking,etc. CITY OF TIGARD Pre Application Conference Notes Page 2 of 8 NON-Residential Application/Planning Division Section Z LANDSCAPING (Refer to Code Chapters 18.745,18.765 and 18.705) STREET TREES ARE REQUIRED FOR ALL DEVELOPMENTS FRONTING ON A PUBLIC OR PRIVATE STREET as well as driveways which are more than 100 feet in length. Street trees must be placed either within the public right-of-way or on private property within six (6) feet of the right-of-way boundary. Street trees must have a minimum caliper of at least two (2) inches when measured four (4) feet above grade. Street trees should be spaced 20 to 40 feet apart depending on the branching width of the proposed tree species at maturity. Further information on regulations affecting street trees may be obtained from the Planning Division. A MINIMUM OF ONE (1) TREE FOR EVERY SEVEN (7) PARKING SPACES MUST BE PLANTED in and around all parking areas in order to provide a vegetative canopy effect. Landscaped parking areas shall include special design features which effectively screen the parking lot areas from view. These design features may include the use of landscaped berms,decorative walls,and raised planters. ® RECYCLING (Refer to Code Chapter 18.755) Applicant should CONTACT FRANCHISE HAULER FOR REVIEW AND APPROVAL OF SITE SERVICING COMPATIBILITY. Locating a trash/recycling enclosure within a clear vision area such as at the intersection of two (2) driveways within a parking lot is prohibited. Much of Tigard is within Pride Disposal's Service area. Pride Disposal can be reached at(503) 625-6177. ® PARKING (Refer to Code Section 18.765.040) REQUIRED parking for this type of use: sales oriented retail—3.7/1.000 square feet minimum(26 spaces). Parking SHOWN on preliminary plan(s): 30 spaces. SECONDARY USE REQUIRED parking: Parking SHOWN on preliminary plan(s): NO MORE THAN 50% OF REQUIRED SPACES MAY BE DESIGNATED AND/OR DIMENSIONED AS COMPACT SPACES. PARKING STALLS shall be dimensioned as follows: • Standard parking space dimensions: 8 feet,6 inches x 18 feet,6 inches. • Compact parking space dimensions: 7 feet,6 inches x 16 feet,6 inches. Note: Parking space width includes the width of a stripe that separates the parking space from an adjoining space. Note: A maximum of three (3)feet of the vehicle overhang area in front of a wheel stop or curb can be included as part of required parking space depth. This area cannot be included as landscaping for meeting the minimum percentage requirements. HANDICAPPED PARKING: • All parking areas shall PROVIDE APPROPRIA 1'ELY LOCATED AND DIMENSIONED DISABLED PERSON PARKING spaces. The minimum number of disabled person parking spaces to be provided, as well as the parking stall dimensions,is mandated by the Americans with Disabilities Act (ADA). A handout is available upon request. A handicapped parking space symbol shall be painted on the parking space surface and an appropriate sign shall be posted. • BICYCLE RACKS ARE REQUIRED FOR MULTI-FAMILY, COMMERCIAL AND INDUSTRIAL DEVELOPMENTS. Bicycle racks shall be located in areas protected from automobile traffic and in convenient locations. ❑ LOADING AREA REQUIREMENTS (Refer to Code Section 18.765.080) Every COMMERCIAL OR INDUSTRIAL BUILDING IN EXCESS OF 10,000 SQUARE FEET shall be provided with a loading space. The space size and location shall be as approved by the City Engineer. ® BICYCLE RACKS (Refer to Code Section 18.765) BICYCLE RACKS are required FOR MULTI-FAMILY, COMMERCIAL AND INDUSTRIAL DEVELOPMENTS. Bicyde racks shall be located in areas protected from automobile traffic and in convenient locations. CITY OF TIGARD Pre-Application Conference Notes Page 3 of 8 NON-Residential Application/Planning Division Section ❑ SENSITIVE LANDS (Refer to Code Chapter 18.775) The Code provides REGULATIONS FOR LANDS WHICH ARE POTENTIALLY UNSUITABLE FOR DEVELOPMENT DUE TO AREAS WITHIN THE 100-YEAR FLOODPLAIN, NATURAL DRAINAGEWAYS,WETLAND AREAS,ON SLOPES IN EXCESS OF 25 PERCENT,OR ON UNSTABLE GROUND. Staff will attempt to preliminary identify sensitive lands areas at the pre-application conference based on available information. HOWEVER, the responsibility to precisely identify sensitive land areas, and their boundaries, is the responsibility of the applicant. Areas meeting the definitions of sensitive lands must be clearly indicated on plans submitted with the development application. Chapter 18.775 also provides regulations for the use, protection, or modification of sensitive lands areas. RESIDENTIAL DEVELOPMENT IS PROHIBITED WITHIN FLOODPLAINS. ❑ STEEP SLOPES (Refer to Code Section 18.775.080.C) When STEEP SLOPES exist, prior to issuance of a final order, a geotechnical report must be submitted which addresses the approval standards of the Tigard Community Development Code Section 18.775.080.C. The report shall be based upon field exploration and investigation and shall include specific recommendations for achieving the requirements of Section 18.775.080.C. ® CLEAN WATER SERVICES (CWS) BUFFER STANDARDS (Refer to CWS R&O 07-20/USA Regulations-Chapter 3) LAND DEVELOPMENT ADJACENT TO SENSITIVE AREAS shall preserve and maintain or create a vegetated corridor for a buffer wide enough to protect the water quality functioning of the sensitive area. Design Criteria: The VEGETATED CORRIDOR WIDTH is dependent on the sensitive area. The following table identifies the required widths: TABLE 3.1 VEGETATED CORRIDOR WIDTHS SOURCE: CWS DESIGN AND CONSTRUCTION STANDARDS MANUAL/RESOLUTION&ORDER 07-20 SENSITIVE AREA DEFINITION SLOPE ADJACENT WIDTH OF VEGETATED TO SENSITIVE AREA4 CORRIDOR PER SIDE5 • Streams with intermittent flow draining: <25% 10 to <50 acres 15 feet 25 feet I >50 to <100 acres • Existing or created wetlands<0.5 acre 25 feet ♦ Existing or created wetlands>0.5 acre <25% 50 feet ♦ Rivers,streams,and springs with year-round flow • Streams with intermittent flow draining>100 acres ♦ Natural lakes and ponds • Streams with intermittent flow draining. >25% I 10 to<50 acres 30 feet 50 feet >50 to <100 acres ♦ Existing or created wetlands >25% Variable from 50-200 feet. Measure in 25- ♦ Rivers,streams,and springs with year-round flow foot increments from the starting point to • Streams with intermittent flow draining>100 acres the top of ravine(break in<25%slope), ♦ Natural lakes and ponds add 35 feet past the top of ravine6 ;Starting point for measurement=edge of the defined channel(bankful flow)for streams/rivers,delineated wetland boundary,delineated spring boundary,and/or average high water for lakes or ponds,whichever offers greatest resource protection. Intermittent springs,located a minimum of 15 feet within the river/stream or wetland vegetated corridor,shall not serve as a starting point for measurement. 5Vegetated corridor averaging or reduction is allowed only when the vegetated corridor is certified to be in a marginal or degraded condition. 6The vegetated corridor extends 35 feet from the top of the ravine and sets the outer boundary of the vegetated corridor. The 35 feet may be reduced to 15 feet,if a stamped geotechnical report confirms slope stability shall be maintained with the reduced setback from the top of ravine. CITY OF TIGARD Pre-Application Conference Notes Page 4 of 8 NON-Residential Application/Planning Division Section • Restrictions in the Vegetate Co.--.nor: NO structures, development, construction activities, gardens, lawns, application of chemicals, dumping of any materials of any kind, or other activities shall be permitted which otherwise detract from the water quality protection provided by the vegetated corridor,except as provided for in the CWS Design and Construction Standards. Location of Vegetated Corridor: IN ANY RESIDENTIAL DEVELOPMENT WHICH CREMES MULTIPLE PARCELS or lots intended for separate ownership,such as a subdivision,the vegetated corridor shall be contained in a separate tract,and shall not be a part of any parcel to be used for the construction of a dwelling unit. CWS Service Provider Letter. PRIOR TO SUBMITTAL of any land use applications, the applicant must obtain a CWS Service Provider Letter which will outline the conditions necessary to comply with the CWS R&O 07-20 sensitive area requirements. If there are no sensitive areas,CWS must still issue a letter stating a CWS Service Provider Letter is not required. ® SIGNS (Refer to Code Chapter 18.780) SIGN PERMITS MUST BE OBTAINED PRIOR TO INSTALLATION OF ANY SIGN in the City of Tigard. A "Guidelines for Sign Permits" handout is available upon request. Additional sign area or height beyond Code standards may be permitted if the sign proposal is reviewed as part of a development review application. Alternatively,a Sign Code Exception application may be filed for Director's review. ® TREE REMOVAL PLAN REQUIREMENTS (Refer to Code Section 18.790.030.0 and the "Tree Plan Requirements Handout" included in your pre-application conference packet) A TREE PLAN FOR THE PLANTING,REMOVAL AND PRO 1'ECTION OF TREES prepared by a certified arborist shall be provided for any lot,parcel or combination of lots or parcels for which a development application for a subdivision, partition, site development review, planned development, or conditional use is filed. PROTECTION IS PREFERRED OVER REMOVAL WHEREVER POSSIBLE (Address all items in the City's Tree Plan Requirements Handout). THE TREE PLAN SHALL INCLUDE the following: • Identification of the location, size and species of all existing trees including trees designated as significant by the City; • Identification of a program to save existing trees or mitigate tree removal over 12 inches in caliper. Mitigation must follow the replacement guidelines of Section 18.790.060.D according to the following standards and shall be exclusive of trees required by other development code provisions for landscaping, streets and parking lots: Retainage of less than 25% of existing trees over 12 inches in caliper requires a mitigation program according to Section 18.150.070.D. of no net loss of trees; I Retainage of from 25 to 50% of existing trees over 12 inches in caliper requires that two-thirds of the trees to be removed be mitigated according to Section 18.790.060.D.; Retainage of from 50 to 75%of existing trees over 12 inches in caliper requires that 50%of the trees to be removed be mitigated according to Section 18.790.060.D.; Retainage of 75%or greater of existing trees over 12 inches in caliper requires no mitigation; • Identification of all trees which are proposed to be removed;and • A protection program defining standards and methods that will be used by the applicant to protect trees during and after construction. TREES REMOVED WITHIN THE PERIOD OF ONE (1) YEAR PRIOR TO A DEVELOPMENT APPLICATION LISTED ABOVE will be inventoried as part of the tree plan above and will be replaced according to Section 18.790.060.D. CITY OF TIGARD Pre-Application Conference Notes Page 5 of 8 NON-Residential Application/Planning Di ision Section Z MITIGATION (Refer to Code Section 18.790.060.E.) REPLACEMENT OF A TREE shall take place according to the following guidelines: • A replacement tree shall be a substantially similar species considering site characteristics. • If a replacement tree of the species of the tree removed or damaged is not reasonably available, the Director may allow replacement with a different species of equivalent natural resource value. • If a replacement tree of the size cut is not reasonably available on the local market or would not be viable, the Director shall require replacement with more than one tree in accordance with the following formula: The number of replacement trees required shall be determined by dividing the estimated caliper size of the tree removed or damaged, by the caliper size of the largest reasonably available replacement trees. If this number of trees cannot be viably located on the subject property, the Director may require one (1) or more replacement trees to be planted on other property within the city,either public property or, with the consent of the owner,private property. ► The planting of a replacement tree shall take place in a manner reasonably calculated to allow growth to maturity. IN-LIEU OF TREE REPLACEMENT under Subsection D of this section, a party may, with the consent of the Director,elect to compensate the City for its costs in performing such tree replacement. ® CLEAR VISION AREA (Refer to Code Chapter 18.795) The City requires that CLEAR VISION AREAS BE MAINTAINED BETWEEN THREE (3) AND EIGHT (8) FEET IN HEIGHT at road/driveway, road/railroad, and road/road intersections. The size of the required clear vision area depends upon the abutting street's functional classification and any existing obstructions within the clear vision area. ❑ ADDITIONAL LOT DIMENSIONAL REQUIREMENTS (Refer to Code Section 18.810.060) MINIMUM LOT FRONTAGE: 25 feet unless lot is created through the minor land partition process. Lots created as part of a partition must have a minimum of 15 feet of frontage or have a minimum 15-foot-wide access easement. The DEPTH OF ALL LOTS SHALL NOT EXCEED 21/2 TIMES THE AVERAGE WIDTH, unless the parcel is less than 11/2 times the minimum lot size of the applicable zoning district. CODE CHAPTERS ❑ 18.330(Conditional Use) ❑ 18.620(Tigard Triangle Design Standards) [1 18.760(Nonconforming Situations) ❑ 18.340(Directors Interpretation) ❑ 18.630(Washington Square Regional Center) ® 18.765(Off-Street Parking/Loading Requirements) ❑ 18.350(Planned Development) ❑ 18.640(Durham Quarry Design Standards) ❑ 18.775(Sensitive Lands Review) ® 18.360(Site Development Review) 18.705(Access/Egress/Circulation) ® 18.780(Signs) ❑ 18.370(Variances/Adjustments) ❑ 18.710(Accessory Residential Units) ❑ 18.785(Temporary Use Permits) n 18.380(Zoning Map/Text Amendments) ❑ 18.715(Density Computations) ® 18.790(Tree Removal) ❑ 18.385(Miscellaneous Permits) ❑ 18.720(Design Compatibility Standards) ® 18.795(Visual Clearance Areas) ® 18.390(Decision Making Procedures/Impact Study) M 18.725(Environmental Performance Standards) ❑ 18.798(Wireless Communication Facilities) ❑ 18.410(Lot Line Adjustments) n 18.730(Exceptions To Development Standards) ® 18.810(Street&Utility Improvement Standards) n 18.420(Land Partitions) n 18.740(Historic Overlay) ❑ 18.430(Subdivisions) n 18.742(Home Occupation Permits) ❑ 18.510(Residential Zoning Districts) 18.745(Landscaping&Screening Standards) ® 18.520(Commercial Zoning Districts) ❑ 18.750(Manufactured/Mobil Home Regulations) ❑ 18.530(Industrial Zoning Districts) fl 18.755(Mixed Solid Waste/Recyding Storage) CITY OF TIGARD Pre-Application Conference Notes Page 6 of 8 NON-Residential Application/Planning Division Section ADDITIONAL CONCERNS Oh )MMENTS: Three bicycle spaces are required for this development. Please design spaces/parking area for these three spaces that meets the requirements of TDC 18.765.050. Trees are required at a ratio of 1 tree for every 7 parking spaces. Species should be chosen to provide a canopy effect for the parking areas. Parking areas must be screened from view(see standards in 18.745.050.E.1). There is a transit stop along the Pacific Highway street frontage. The applicant is encouraged to work with Tri-Met to see what sort of facility upgrades may be required. Contact Ben Baldwin,Project Planner at baldw-inb(trimet.org. He said he would be happy to look at a pdf of the plan and give feedback. PROCEDURE Administrative Staff Review. Public hearing before the Land Use Hearings Officer. Public hearing before the Planning Commission. Public hearing before the Planning Commission with the Commission making a recommendation on the proposal to the City Council. An additional public hearing shall be held by the City Council. APPLICATION SUBMITTAL PROCESS All APPLICATIONS MUST BE ACCEPTED BY A PLANNING DIVISION STAFF MEMBER of the Community Development Department at Tigard City Hall offices. PLEASE NOTE: Applications submitted by mail or dropped off at the counter without Planning Division acceptance may be returned. The Planning counter closes at 5:00 PM. Maps submitted with an application shall be folded IN ADVANCE to 81/2" x 11". One,81/2" x 11" map of a proposed project shall be submitted for attachment to the staff report or administrative decision. Applications with unfolded maps shall not be accepted. The Planning Division and Engineering Department will perform a preliminary review of the application and will determine whether an application is complete within 30 days of the counter submittal. Staff will notify the applicant if additional information or additional copies of the submitted materials are required. The administrative decision or public hearing will typically occur approximately 45 to 60 days after an application is accepted as being complete by the Planning Division. Applications involving difficult or protracted issues or requiring review by other jurisdictions may take additional time to review. Written recommendations from the Planning staff are issued seven (7) days prior to the public hearing. A 10-day public appeal period follows all land use decisions. An appeal on this matter would be heard by the Tigard City Council. A basic flow chart which illustrates the review process is available from the Planning Division upon request. Land use applications requiring a public hearing must have notice posted on-site by the applicant no less than 10 days prior to the public hearing. This PRE-APPLICATION CONFERENCE AND THE NOTES OF THE CONFERENCE ARE IN'1'PNDED TO INFORM the prospective applicant of the primary Community Development Code requirements applicable to the potential development of a particular site and to allow the City staff and prospective applicant to discuss the opportunities and constraints affecting development of the site. BUILDING PERMITS PLANS FOR BUILDING AND OTHER RELATED PERMITS WILL NOT BE ACCEPTED FOR REVIEW UNTIL A LAND USE APPROVAL HAS BEEN ISSUED. Final inspection approvals by the Building Division will not be granted until there is compliance with all conditions of development approval. These pre-application notes do not include comments from the Building Division. For proposed buildings or modifications to existing buildings, it is recommended to contact a Building Division Plans Examiner to determine if there are building code issues that would prevent the structure from being constructed, as proposed. CITY OF TIGARD Pre-Application Conference Notes Page 7 of 8 NON-Residential Application/Planning Division Section Additionally, with regard to Subdivisions and Minor Land Partitions where any structure to be demolished has system development charge (SDC) credits and the underlying parcel for that structure will be eliminated when the new plat is recorded, the City's policy is to apply those system development credits to the first building Tpermit issued in the development (UNLESS OTHERWISE DIRECTED BY THE DEVELOPER AT HE TIME IN WHICH THE DEMOLITION PERMIT IS OBTAINED). PLEASE NOTE: The conference and notes cannot cover all Code requirements and aspects related to site planning that should apply to the development of your site plan. Failure of the staff to provide information required by the Code shall not constitute a waiver of the applicable standards or requirements. It is recommended that a prospective applicant either obtain and read the Community Development Code or ask any questions of City staff relative to Code requirements prior to submitting an application. AN ADDITIONAL PRE-APPLICATION FEE AND CONFERENCE WILL BE REQUIRED IF AN APPLICATION PERTAINING TO THIS PRE-APPLICATION CONFERENCE IS SUBMITTED AFTER A PERIOD OF MORE THAN SIX (6) MONTHS FOLLOWING THIS CONFERENCE (unless deemed as unnecessary by the Planning Division). PREPARED BY: Cheryl Caines �� " Q . CCc c J CITY OF TIGARD PLANNING DIVISION PHONE: 503-639-4171 FAX: 503-624-3681 DIRECT: 503-718-2437 EMAIL: cherylc @tigard-or.gov TITLE 18(CITY OF TIGARD'S COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT CODE) INTERNET ADDRESS: www.tigard-or.gov H:\patty\masters\Pre-App Notes Commercial.doc Updated: 16-May-O8 CITY OF TIGARD Pre-Application Conference Notes Page 8 of 8 NON-Residential Application/Planning Division Section PRE-APNLICATION CONFERENCE NOTES ➢ ENGINEERING SECTION Q TIGARD City of Tigard,Oregon Community(Development ShapingA Better Community PUBLIC FACILITIES Tax Mapts): 2S102CD01802 Tax Lot[sl: Use Type: The extent of necessary public improvements and dedications which shall be required of the applicant will be recommended by City staff and subject to approval by the appropriate authority. There will be no final recommendation to the decision making authority on behalf of the City staff until all concerned commenting agencies, City staff and the public have had an opportunity to review and comment on the application. The following comments are a projection of public improvement related requirements that may be required as a condition of development approval for your proposed project. Right-of-way dedication: The City of Tigard requires that land area be dedicated to the public: (1.) To increase abutting public rights-of-way to the ultimate functional street classification right-of-way width as specified by the Community Development Code; or (2.) For the creation of new streets. Approval of a development application for this site will require right-of-way dedication for: ® SW Pacific Highway (Highway 99W) to 52 feet from centerline U SW to feet SW to feet ❑ SW to feet Street improvements: i>Q Half street improvements will be necessary along SW Pacific Highway, to include: ❑ feet of pavement concrete curb I I storm sewers and other underground utilities ® 10-foot concrete sidewalk to be constructed with back of walk 6 inches from ROW line ® street trees Z street signs, traffic control devices, streetlights and a two-year streetlight fee. CITY OF TIGARD Pre-Applicatfon Conference Notes Page 1 of 6 Engineering Department Section ® Other: 1. Water oliality treatment and detention are both required. Both must be submitted to ODOT for review a, approval since 99W is under ODO-, isdiction. 2. Construction of planter strip is required. Planter strip will be located between existing curb and new sidewalk. Old sidewalk is to be removed and disposed of. 3. Preliminary sight distance certification must be submitted before application is deemed complete. 4. Other requirements and permits by ODOT for the frontage of Highway 99W. 5. Storm drainage calculations must be submitted with the application. ❑ street improvements will be necessary along SW , to include: ❑ feet of pavement I I concrete curb ❑ storm sewers and other underground utilities �J -foot concrete sidewalk Li street trees I street signs, traffic control devices, streetlights and a two-year streetlight fee. ❑ Other: ❑ street improvements will be necessary along SW , to include: feet of pavement n concrete curb ❑ storm sewers and other underground utilities ❑ -foot concrete sidewalk I I street trees I I street signs, traffic control devices, streetlights and a two-year streetlight fee. ❑ Other: ❑ street improvements will be necessary along SW , to include: ❑ feet of pavement J concrete curb I I storm sewers and other underground utilities -foot concrete sidewalk ❑ street trees ❑ street signs, traffic control devices, streetlights and a two-year streetlight fee. ❑ Other: (—f street improvements will be necessary along SW , to include: CITY OF TIGARD Pre-Application Conference Notes Page 2 of 6 Engineering Department Section feet of pavement concrete curb storm sewers and other underground utilities -foot concrete sidewalk street trees street signs, traffic control devices, streetlights and a two-year streetlight fee. I I Other: Agreement for Future Street Improvements: In some cases, where street improvements or other necessary public improvements are not currently practical, the improvements may be deferred. In such cases, a condition of development approval may be specified which requires the property owner(s) to provide a future improvement guarantee. The City Engineer will determine the form of this guarantee. The following street improvements may be eligible for such a future improvement guarantee: (1.) (2.) Overhead Utility Lines: Section 18.810.120 of the Tigard Municipal Code (TMC) requires all overhead utility lines adjacent to a development to be placed underground or, if approved by the City Engineer, a fee in-lieu of undergrounding can be paid. This requirement is valid even if the utility lines are on the opposite side of the street from the site. If the fee in-lieu is approved, it is equal to $ 35.00 per lineal foot of street frontage that contains the overhead lines. There are existing overhead utility lines which run adjacent to this site along SW . Prior to , the applicant shall either place these utilities underground, or pay the fee in-lieu described above. Sanitary Sewers: The nearest sanitary sewer line to this property is a(n) inch line which is located . The proposed development must be connected to a public sanitary sewer. It is the developer's responsibility to Water Supply: The City of Tigard (Phone:(503) 639-4171) provides public water service in the area of this site. This service provider should be contacted for information regarding water supply for your proposed development. Fire Protection: CITY OF TIGARO Pre-Application Conference Notes Page 3 of 6 Engineering Department Section • Tualatin Valley Fire and Rescue District (South Division) [Contort John Dalby, (503) 356-4723] provides fire protection sen s within the City of Tigard. Th )istrict should be contacted for information regarding the adequacy of circulation systems, the need for fire hydrants, or other questions related to fire protection. Storm Sewer Improvements: All proposed development within the City shall be designed such that storm water runoff is conveyed to an approved public drainage system. The applicant will be required to submit a proposed storm drainage plan for the site, and may be required to prepare a sub-basin drainage analysis to ensure that the proposed system will accommodate runoff from upstream properties when fully developed. Storm drainage plan and calculations shall be submitted with the application for it to be considered complete. Storm Water Quality: The City has agreed to enforce Surface Water Management (SWM) regulations established by the Unified Sewerage Agency (USA) (Resolution and Order No. 00-7) which requires the construction of on-site water quality facilities. The facilities shall be designed to remove 65 percent of the phosphorus contained in 100 percent of the storm water runoff generated from impervious surfaces. The resolution contains a provision that would allow an applicant to pay a fee in-lieu of constructing an on-site facility provided specific criteria are met. The City will use discretion in determining whether or not the fee in- lieu will be offered. If the fee is allowed, it will be based upon the amount of impervious surfaces created; for every 2,640 square feet, or portion thereof. Please contact the Building Division for the current fee. Preliminary sizing calculations for any proposed water quality facility shall be submitted with the development application. It is anticipated that this project will require: ® Construction of an on-site water quality facility. Payment of the fee in-lieu. Other Comments: All proposed sanitary sewer and storm drainage systems shall be designed such that City maintenance vehicles will have unobstructed access to critical manholes in the systems. Maintenance access roadways may be required if existing or proposed facilities are not otherwise readily accessible. TRAFFIC IMPACT FEES In 1990, Washington County adopted a county-wide Traffic.Impact Fee (TIF) ordinance. The Traffic Impact Fee program collects fees from new development based on the development's projected impact upon the City's transportation system. The applicant shall be required to pay a fee based upon the number of trips which are projected to result from the proposed development. The calculation of the TIF is based on the proposed use of the land, the size of the project, and a general use based fee CITY OF TIGARD Pre-Application Conference Notes Page 4 of 6 Engineering Department Section category. The TIF shall be calculated at the time of building permit issuance. In limited circumstances, payment of the TIF may be a ed to be deferred until the issuanc ; an occupancy permit. Deferral of the payment until occupancy is permissible only when the TIF is greater than $5,000.00. PERMITS Public Facility Improvement (PFI) Permit: Any work within a public right-of-way in the City of Tigard requires a PFI permit from the Engineering Department. A PFI permit application is available at the Planning/Engineering counter in City Hall. For more extensive work such as street widening improvements, main utility line extensions or subdivision infrastructure, plans prepared by a registered professional engineer must be submitted for review and approval. The Engineering Department fee structure for this permit is considered a cost recovery system. A deposit is collected with the application, and the City will track its costs throughout the life of the permit, and will either refund any remaining portion of the deposit, or invoice the Permittee in cases where City costs exceeds the deposit amount. NOTE: Engineering Staff time will also be tracked for any final design-related assistance provided to a Permittee or their engineer prior to submittal of a PFI permit application. This time will be considered part of the administration of the eventual PFI permit. The Permittee will also be required to post a performance bond, or other such suitable security. Where professional engineered plans are required, the Permittee must execute a Developer/Engineer Agreement, which will obligate the design engineer to perform the primary inspection of the public improvement construction work. The PFI permit fee structure is as follows: NOTE: If an PFI Permit is required,the applicant must obtain that permit prior to release of any permits from the Building Division. Building Division Permits: The following is a brief overview of the type of permits issued by the Building Division. For a more detailed explanation of these permits, please contact the Development Services Counter at 503-639-4171, ext. 304. Site Improvement Permit (SIT). This permit is generally issued for all new commercial, industrial and multi-family projects. This permit will also be required for land partitions where lot grading and private utility work is required. This permit covers all on-site preparation, grading and utility work. Home builders will also be required to obtain a SIT permit for grading work in cases where the lot they are working on has slopes in excess of 20% and foundation excavation material is not to be hauled from the site. Building Permit (BUP). This permit covers only the construction of the building and is issued after, or concurrently with, the SIT permit. CITY OF TIGARD Pre-Application Conference Notes Page 5 of 6 Engineering Department Section Master Permit (MST). This permit is issued for all single and multi-family buildings. It covers all work nece ,ry for building construction, incl., g sub-trades (excludes grading, etc.). This permit can not be issued in a subdivision until the public improvements are substantially complete and a mylar copy of the recorded plat has been returned by the applicant to the City. For a land partition, the applicant must obtain an Engineering Permit, if required, and return a mylar copy of the recorded plat to the City prior to issuance of this permit. Other Permits. There are other special permits, such as mechanical, electrical and plumbing that may also be required. Contact the Development Services Counter for more information. GRADING PLAN REQUIREMENTS FOR SUBDIVISIONS All subdivision projects shall require a proposed grading plan prepared by the design engineer. The engineer will also be required to indicate which lots have natural slopes between 10% and 20%, as well as lots that have natural slopes in excess of 20%. This information will be necessary in determining if special grading inspections will be required when the lots develop. The design engineer will also be required to shade all structural fill areas on the construction plans. In addition, each homebuilder will be required to submit a specific site and floor plan for each lot. The site plan shall include topographical contours and indicate the elevations of the corners of the lot. The builder shall also indicate the proposed elevations at the four corners of the building. PREPARED BY: Q . f- 924 /®� f ENGI ING DEPARTMENT STAFF DATE Phone: (5031639-4171 Fax: (5031624-0752 document] Revised: September 2,2003 CITY OF TIGARD Pre-Application Conference Notes Page 6 of 6 Engineering Deportment Sectlen Tualatin Valley Fire & Rescue Tualatin Valley Fire & Rescue Fire Marshal's Office o ? - z z - 2-007 PKE. col - ocozcl Date Project No. Project Name A(71-0 7 Q tIE S i OQj /'f0 Assigned Planner C Jt-M `r' L- CAI/\l ZS Tualatin Valley Fire & Rescue can endorse this proposal provided the following checked items are included in the ultimate design of the project. FIRE APPARATUS ACCESS ROAD DISTANCE FROM BUILDING AND TURNAROUNDS: Access roads shall be within 150 feet of all portions of the exterior wall of the first story of the building as measured by an approved route around the exterior of the building. An approved turnaround is required if the remaining distance to an approved intersecting roadway, as measured along the fire apparatus access road, is greater than 150 feet. (IFC 503.1.1) ❑ DEAD END ROADS: Dead end fire apparatus access roads in excess of 150 feet in length shall be provided with an approved turnaround. (IFC 503.2.5) ❑ FIRE APPARATUS ACCESS ROAD EXCEPTION FOR AUTOMATIC SPRINKLER PROTECTION: When buildings are completely protected with an approved automatic fire sprinkler system, the requirements for fire apparatus access may be modified as approved by the fire code official. (IFC 503.1.1) ❑ ADDITIONAL ACCESS ROADS—COMMERCIAL: Where buildings exceed 30 feet in height or three stories in height shall have at least two separate means of fire apparatus access. Buildings or facilities having a gross area of more than 62,000 square feet shall be provided with at least two separate means of fire apparatus access. Buildings up to 124,000 square feet provided with fire sprinklers may have a single access. (IFC D104) ❑ ADDITIONAL ACCESS ROADS — ONE-OR TWO-FAMILY RESIDENTIAL: Where there are more than 30 one- or two-family dwelling units, not less than two separate approved means of access shall be provided. Where there are more than 30 dwelling units and all are protected by approved residential sprinkler systems, a single access will be allowed. (IFC D107) ❑ ADDITIONAL ACCESS ROADS — MULTIPLE-FAMILY RESIDENTIAL: Where there are more than 100 multiple-family dwelling units, not less than two separate approved means of access shall be provided Projects up to 200 dwelling units that are protected by approved residential sprinkler systems may have a single access. Projects having more than 200 dwelling units shall have two separate approved means of access regardless of whether they are equipped with fire sprinkler systems. (IFC D106) ❑ AERIAL FIRE APPARATUS ACCESS: Buildings or portions of buildings or facilities exceeding 30 feet in height above the lowest level of fire department vehicle access shall be provided with approved fire apparatus access roads capable of accommodating fire department aerial apparatus. Overhead utility and power lines shall not be located within the aerial fire apparatus access roadway. Fire apparatus access roads shall have a minimum unobstructed width of 26 North Division Office 14480 SW Jenkins Road, Beaverton,OR 97005 Phone: 503-356-4700 Fax: 503-644-2214 www.tvfr.com Tv At Tualatin Valley Fire & Rescue feet in the immediate vicinity of any building or portion of building more than 30 feet in height. At least one of the required access routes meeting this condition shall be located within a minimum of 15 feet and a maximum of 30 feet from the building, and shall be positioned parallel to one entire side of the building. (IFC D105) ❑ REMOTENESS: Where two access roads are required, they shall be placed a distance apart equal to not less than one half of the length of the maximum overall diagonal dimension of the property or area to be served, measured in a straight line between accesses. (IFC D104.3) ❑ FIRE APPARATUS ACCESS ROAD WIDTH AND VERTICAL CLEARANCE: Fire apparatus access roads shall have an unobstructed width of not less than 20 feet(12 feet for up to two dwelling units and accessory buildings), and an unobstructed vertical clearance of not less than 13 feet 6 inches. Where fire apparatus roadways are less than 26 feet wide, "NO PARKING" signs shall be installed on both sides of the roadway and in turnarounds as needed. Where fire apparatus roadways are more than 26 feet wide but less than 32 feet wide, "NO PARKING" signs shall be installed on one side of the roadway and in turnarounds as needed. Where fire apparatus roadways are 32 feet wide or more, parking is not restricted. (IFC 503.2.1) The fire district does not endorse the design concept wherein twenty feet of unobstructed roadway with is not provided. ❑ FIRE APPARATUS ACCESS ROADS WITH FIRE HYDRANTS: Where a fire hydrant is located on a fire apparatus access road, the minimum road width shall be 26 feet. (IFC D103.1) ❑TURNOUTS: When any fire apparatus access road exceeds 400 feet in length, turnouts 10 feet wide and 30 feet long shall be provided in addition to the required road width and shall be placed no more than 400 feet apart, unless otherwise approved by the fire code official. These distances may be adjusted based on visibility and light distances. (IFC 503.2.2) ❑ NO PARKING SIGNS: Where fire apparatus roadways are not of sufficient width to accommodate parked vehicles and 20 feet of unobstructed driving surface, "No Parking" signs shall be installed on one or both sides of the roadway and in turnarounds as needed. Roads 26 feet wide or less shall be posted on both sides as a fire lane. Roads more than 26 feet wide to 32 feet wide shall be posted on one side as a fire lane. Signs shall read "NO PARKING - FIRE LANE" and shall be installed with a clear space above grade level of 7 feet. Signs shall be 12 inches wide by 18 inches high and shall have red letters on a white reflective background. (IFC D103.6) ❑ SURFACE AND LOAD CAPACITIES: Fire apparatus access roads shall be of an all-weather surface that is easily distinguishable from the surrounding area and is capable of supporting not less than 12,500 pounds point load (wheel load) and 60,000 pounds live load (gross vehicle weight). You may need to provide documentation from a registered engineer that the design will be capable of supporting such loading. (IFC D102.1) ❑ BRIDGES: Where a bridge or an elevated surface is part of a fire apparatus access road,the bridge shall be constructed and maintained in accordance with AASHTO Standard Specification for Highway Bridges. Bridges and elevated surfaces shall be designed for a live load sufficient to carry the imposed loads of fire apparatus.Vehicle load limits shall be posted at both entrances to bridges when required by the fire code official. Where elevated surfaces designed for emergency vehicle use are adjacent to surfaces which are not designed for such use, approved barriers, approved signs or both shall be installed and maintained when required by the fire code official. (IFC 503.2.6) ITURNING RADIUS: The inside turning radius and outside turning radius shall be not less than 28 feet and 48 Meet respectively, measured from the same center point. (IFC 503.2.4 & D103.3) ❑ PAINTED CURBS: Where required, fire apparatus access roadway curbs shall be painted red and marked "NO PARKING FIRE LANE" at approved intervals. Lettering shall have a stroke of not less than one inch wide by six inches high. Lettering shall be white on red background. (IFC 503.3) ❑ GRADE: Fire apparatus access roadway grades shall not exceed 10 percent. Intersections and turnarounds shall be level (maximum 5%)with the exception of crowning for water run-off. When fire sprinklers are installed, a North Division Office 14480 SW Jenkins Road,Beaverton,OR 97005 Phone: 503-356-4700 Fax: 503-644-2214 www.tvfr.com Tv At Tualatin Valley Fire & Rescue maximum grade of 15% may be allowed. Adequacy of fire apparatus access shall be evaluated from the point beginning at the first due fire station to a point within 150 feet of all structures within the development. The approval of fire sprinklers as an alternate shall be accomplished in accordance with the provisions of ORS 455.610(5). (IFC 503.2.7 & D103.2) ❑ GATES: Gates securing fire apparatus roads shall comply with all of the following: (IFC D103.5) • Minimum unobstructed width shall be 16 feet, or two 10 foot sections with a center post or island. • Gates serving one- or two-family dwellings shall be a minimum of 12 feet in width. • Gates shall be set back a minimum of 30 feet from the intersecting roadway. • Gates shall be of the swinging or sliding type • Manual operation shall be capable by one person • Electric gates shall be equipped with a means for operation by fire department personnel • Locking devices shall be approved. i II •MMERCIAL BUILDINGS - REQUIRED FIRE FLOW: The required fire flow for the building shall not A ceed 3,000 gallons per minute (GPM) or the available GPM in the water delivery system at 20 psi, whichever is less as calculated using IFC, Appendix B A worksheet for calculating the required fire flow is available from the Fire Marshal's Office. (IFC B105.2) ❑ SINGLE FAMILY DWELLINGS - REQUIRED FIRE FLOW: The minimum available fire flow for single family dwellings and duplexes served by a municipal water supply shall be 1,000 gallons per minute. If the structure(s) is (are) 3,600 square feet or larger, the required fire flow shall be determined according to IFC Appendix B. (IFC B105 1) ❑ RURAL BUILDINGS - REQUIRED FIRE FLOW: Required fire flow for rural and suburban areas in which adequate and reliable water supply systems do not exist may be calculated in accordance with National Fire Protection Association Standard 1142, 2001 Edition, when approved by the fire code official. Please contact the Fire Marshal's Office for special assistance and other requirements that may apply. (IFC B105.1.1) hydrant• HYDRANTS —COMMERCIAL BUILDINGS: Where a portion of the building is more than 400 feet from hydrant on a fire apparatus access road, as measured in an approved route around the exterior of the building, on-site fire hydrants and mains shall be provided. This distance may be increased to 600 feet for buildings equipped throughout with an approved automatic sprinkler system. (IFC 508 5.1) ❑ FIRE HYDRANTS —ONE-AND TWO-FAMILY DWELLINGS & ACCESSORY STRUCTURES: Where a portion of a structure is more than 600 feet from a hydrant on a fire apparatus access road, as measured in an approved route around the exterior of the structure(s), on-site fire hydrants and mains shall be provided. (IFC 508.5.1) E HYDRANT NUMBER AND DISTRIBUTION: The minimum number and distribution of fire hydrants available to building shall not be less than that listed in Appendix C, Table C 105.1. Considerations for placing fire hydrants may be as follows: • Existing hydrants in the area may be used to meet the required number of hydrants as approved. Hydrants that are up to 600 feet away from the nearest point of a subject building that is protected with fire sprinklers may contribute to the required number of hydrants. • Hydrants that are separated from the subject building by railroad tracks shall not contribute to the required number of hydrants unless approved by the fire code official. • Hydrants that are separated from the subject building by divided highways or freeways shall not contribute to the required number of hydrants. Heavily traveled collector streets only as approved by the fire code official. North Division Office 14480 SW Jenkins Road, Beaverton,OR 97005 Phone: 503-356-4700 Fax: 503-644-2214 www.tvfr.com • • Tualatin Valley Fire & Rescue • Hydrants that are accessible only by a bridge shall be acceptable to contribute to the required number of hydrants only if approved by the fire code official. ❑ FIRE HYDRANT DISTANCE FROM AN ACCESS ROAD: Fire hydrants shall be located not more than 15 feet from an approved fire apparatus access roadway. (IFC C102.1) ❑ REFLECTIVE HYDRANT MARKERS: Fire hydrant locations shall be identified by the installation of reflective markers. The markers shall be blue. They shall be located adjacent and to the side of the centerline of the access road way that the fire hydrant is located on. In case that there is no center line, then assume a centerline, and place the reflectors accordingly. (IFC 508.5.4) ❑ FIRE HYDRANT/FIRE DEPARTMENT CONNECTION: A fire hydrant shall be located within 100 feet of a fire department connection (FDC). Fire hydrants and FDC's shall be located on the same side of the fire apparatus access roadway. FDC's shall normally be remote except when approved by the fire code official. (IFC 912.2) CESS AND FIRE FIGHTING WATER SUPPLY DURING CONSTRUCTION: Approved fire apparatus a cess roadways and fire fighting water supplies shall be installed and operational prior to any combustible c nstruction or storage of combustible materials on the site. (IFC 1410.1 & 1412.1) NOX BOX: A Knox Box for access is required for this building. Please contact the Fire Marshal's Office for a order form and instructions regarding installation and placement. (IFC 506) John K. Dalby, Deputy Fire Marshal II Tualatin Valley Fire & Rescue, North Division 14480 SW Jenkins Road Beaverton, OR 97005-1152 503-356-4700 North Division Office 14480 SW Jenkins Road,Beaverton,OR 97005 Phone: 503-356-4700 Fax: 503-644-2214 www.tvfr.com City of Tigard E-'677O1ig7 III TDT—COUNTYWIDE TRANSPORTATION DEVELOPMENT TAX 6. Rate Calculation Worksheet APPLICANT v~C7 �/V DATE / ,-1 �7 MAILING ADDRESS /Z 3 S � �Ep� PREPARED Y /1///ZIS____ CITY/ZIP/ PHONE 7/eay‘� /f/( r3 Q 3 PLANS CHEC f 2UCJ9- Z9 TAX MAP# .. V f d Z e�� o i Ern '/_ PROJECT TITLE Arc SITUS#ADDRESS / 3 J> -P/gL FORMER USE(S) USE ITE # _ TDT DESCRIPTION/NOTES # CODE UNITS X RATE AMOUNT / 933 6.0 x ,3,)Y2 =17 I92_ k-a o ce w� t G� x = x = X = TOTAL TDT,FORMER USE(S) //7 Q diq 'L PROPOSED USE(S) USE ITE # = TDT DES RIPTION/NOTES # CODE UNITS X RATE _ AMOUNT / 8'h L.Yx *973 D, 3 6, .1� PFJI� a/� x x = X = TOTAL TDT,PROPOSED USE(S) )44/0/ 631 LESS TOTAL TDT,FORMER USE(S) - -ffe -17/4 2--- O / ��v�yc TDT INCREASE/(DECREASE) � � (INCREASE��V((=TDT DUE) PAYMENT METHOD CASH/CHECK N O — ,i / 2.yer� e£ (o 2 5.6 CREDIT Rcype « 47 fr Co.T 1�Y-' BANCROFT AGREEMENT ,� (PROMISSORY NOTE) -DF it'5E_ / �6S L /YO✓P/QQ/t/{S �` I ) , Q DEFER TO OCCUPANCY c�-L' I/OFS/CD/FORMS/TDT Rate Calculation Worksheet.indd(Rev.4/22/09) Pre-Application Conference Request for AUTOZONE STORE No. 5658 Submitted to: Current Planning Division City of Tigard, Oregon 13125 SW Hall Blvd. Tigard, OR 97223 (503) 639-4171\ Prepared for: Auto Zone Store Development— Department 8320 123 S. Front Street Memphis TN 38103 (901)495-8714 Prepared by: HDJ Design Group, PLLC 300 W 15th Street Vancouver, WA 98660 Tom Lonergan, Project Manager lonergant @hdjdesigngroup.com (360) 695-3488 (360) 695-8767, fax HD1 RECEIVED DESIGN GROUP SEP 1 0 2009 engineers landscape architects planners surveyors CITY OF TIGARD PLA.NeP,III:!' /ENGINEERING September, 2009 - AUTO ZONE ^-' Table of Contents Tab 1. Cover Sheet & Table of Contents 2. Pre-Application Conference Request Form 3. Narrative Description of the Proposal 4. Site Plan & Vicinity Map 5. Filing Fee Conference Request Form [0 PRE-APPLICATION CONFERENCE REQUEST I _ City of Tigard Permit Center 13125 SW Hall Blvd., Tigard, OR 97223 Phone:503.639.4171 Fax:503.598.1960 TIGARD RECEIVED SEP 1 0 2009 CITY OF TIGARD GENERAL INFORMATION PLANNING/ENGINEERING FOR STAFF USE ONLY Applicant: Auto Zone Store Development-Dept. 8320 Case No.: Para1J1)'? 00Z) Address: 123 S Front Street Phone: 901-495-8714 Receipt No.: I/S-/.51 City: Memphis, TN Zip: 38103 Application Accepted By:_ 144-4‘. HDJ Design Group, Date: q It D l0 9 Contact Person: attn: Tom Lonergan Phone: 360-695-3488 DATE 0 PRE-APP.: 414-a Property Owner/Deed Holder(s) TIME OF PRE-APP.: 10-D1) Bar-Am, LLC PRE-APP.HELD WITH: Address: 1416 3rd Avenue Phone: 206-624-6315 Rev.7/1/09 City: Seattle, WA Zip: 98101 1:\curpin/masters/land use applications\Pre-App Request App.doc Property Address/Location(s): 13405 SW Pacific Highway, Parcel#R994507 REQUIRED SUBMITTAL & Tax Lot#(s): 2S102CB01802 ELEMENTS Tax Map (Note: applications will not be accepted Zoning: C-G, General Commercial District without the required submittal elements) Site Size: ❑ Pre-Application Conf.Request form PRE-APPLICATION CONFERENCE INFORMATION ❑ 5 COPIES ri EACH OF THE FOLLOWING: and any Brief Description of the Proposal and any site- specific questions/issues that you would like to have staff research prior to the meeting. All of the information identified on this form are required to be submitted by ❑ Site Plan. The site plan must show the the applicant and received by the Planning Division a minimum of one(1) proposed lots and/or building layouts drawn to week prior to officially scheduling a pre-application conference date/time to scale. Also, show the location of the subject allow staff ample time to prepare for the meeting. property in relation to the nearest streets; and the locations of driveways on the subject A pre-application conference can usually be scheduled within 1-2 weeks of property and across the street. the Planning Division's receipt of the request for either Tuesday or Thursday ❑ Vicinity Map. mornings. Pre-application conferences are one(1)hour long and are typically ❑ The Proposed Uses. held between the hours of 9:00-11:00 AM. ❑ Topographic Information. Include Contour Lines if Possible. PRE-APPLICATION CONERENCES MUST BE SCHEDULED IN PERSON AT THE COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT COUNTER ❑ If the POLE project, Conference is for a MONOPOLE project, the applicant must FROM 8:00-4:00/MONDY-FRIDAY. attach a copy of the letter and proof in the form of an affidavit of mailing, that the collocation IF MORE THAN 4 PEOPLE ARE EXPECTED TO ATTEND THE protocol was completed (see Section PRE-APPLCIATION CONFERENCE IN YOUR GROUP, PLEASE 18.798.080 of the Tigard Community INFORM THE CITY IN ADVANCE SO THAT ALTERNATE ROOM Development Code). ❑ Filing Fee$373.00 r-- Tuesday August 2009 September 2009 October 2009 22 1234 3 4 5 6 7 7 8 9 10 11 . 5 6 7 8 9 9 1011 12 13 14 13 14 15 16 17 18 1 1 12 13 14 15 16 1' 6 17 18 19 20 21 21 22 23 24 25 26 18 19 20 21 22 23 September 2009 , 2425262728 28 29 30 x` 2627282930 31 Day 265,100 Left Week 39 Appointments 8 00 30 9 00 30 10 00'AutoZone Tom Lonergan 360-695-3488 13405 SW Pacific Hwy 6800sf retail bldg CR#1 30 l l 11 0° 30 12°° PM 30 00 30 2 00 30 3 00 30 4 00 30 5 00 30 9,10;2009 1042 AM 1/1 Network Services Narrative Description Pre-Application Narrative for Auto Zone Project Location&Identification The proposed Auto Zone site is located on a site approximately .84 acres (36,791sf+/-) in size. The site is located in the Southwest 1/4 of Section 2, Township 2 South, Range 1 West of the Willamette Meridian. More specifically, the subject site is located at 13405 SW Pacific Highway, within the jurisdictional boundaries of Tigard, Oregon. The site is comprised of one (1) existing tax parcel, numbered 2S 102CB-01802. The site is currently improved with vacant restaurant building, approximately 49 parking spaces, and existing vegetation. Surrounding uses include: a storage facility to the west and southwest; fast food restaurant to the north; and,general retail uses to the east,across SW Pacific Highway. Project Description The applicant is proposing a 6,800sf auto-related retail business at the subject site. Site improvements include a new building, 30 parking spaces and associated landscaping. And, per Table 18.520.1 TMC, `Sales-Oriented General Retail' uses are permitted outright in the General Commercial district. Development Standards Per Table 18.520.2 TMC, Commercial Development Standards, the following standards apply to developments in the C-G district: C-G Zone Required Provided Minimum Area 6,000sf 36,791sf Minimum Width 50 feet 249 feet Front Setback 0 feet 62 feet Side Setback 0 feet 76 feet Rear Setback 0 feet 6 feet Maximum Lot Coverage 85% 83% Maximum Building Height 45 feet Will Comply The applicant proposes a 6,800sf+/- building with 31 parking spaces. The proposed retail building will be constructed over the footprint of the existing structure. Table 18.765.2 of the Tigard Municipal Code requires a minimum of 3.7 parking spaces for every 1,000 M(1,000sf of floor area), which totals 26 spaces, and a requisite maximum of 5.1 spaces for every 1,000 M which totals 36spaces. The proposed site plan portrays 31 parking spaces, which meets this requirement. Additionally, the site plan indicates two (2) bicycle parking spaces, located near the northeast corner of the building. As per Section 18.765.080 TMC,no loading berths are required for this development. Transportation The site is served by SW Pacific Highway, and can be accessed via two driveways near the northerly and southerly boundaries of the site. SW Pacific Highway is classified as an Arterial. Existing improvements include four(4)travel lanes, shoulder,and sidewalk. According to the City's website,the subject's frontage is classified in `Poor' condition. No additional right-of-way dedication is proposed with this application. Environmental The subject site is identified as being within a Clean Water Service (CWS) impact area, which requires adherence to specific design and construction standards. Final plans for stormwater treatment will incorporate design provisions as required. Utilities The site is served publicly by the City for sewer and water service. No changes to the existing systems are proposed with this development. Traffic Pacific Highway has an estimated daily traffic volume between 32,000 and 54,999 vehicles per day, according to available GIS information. As part of the formal land use application a Transportation Analysis will be completed and submitted to City staff. Stormwater Stormwater will be controlled on-site in accordance with TMC Title 18. Runoff from the new impervious surfaces will be collected, treated and discharged to the existing stormwater conveyance system located within SW Pacific Highway. Stormwater runoff will be treated and detained, as necessary, on-site with the application of approved stormwater BMP's, and in conjuction with the City's CWS design and treatment requirements. Summary The proposed Autozone will meet all required elements of the City of Tigard's Code of Ordinances and will provide needed retail services and additional employment opportunity in a high transit district. Site Plan & Vicinity Map U I_ __I AOZOi' z _ i'o � Located In The SW '/a, Sec. 2, T2S, R1 W,W.M. �L ''s..4.. 1' Ate'*. Z..0 i. -z. ,a ,' -e'i. ■ ice• \\\ \ \ ! i \ \ i \ i / - ( .r ▪.-..-e; al \ . @ - \. \ i \ c6]'_.J o- f FJ ,> HU ��/ VICINITY MAP £ ,, `may �/ NOT TO SCALE € ice' �., I �_ / 0 s / \ �� \ i / I // Ia........ vi, J TAX LOT l `-� / ! o+A ENrRr " / J '' W 2S1Q2C801800� ' rah '' =— ' �It /� � C° ___- ____-_'_____. _.•i.__,N33'iS17'E 181.27 —— �--fir- LAEXTG III ' IIII\ //I r= ,it I/ � � l � I ii � )I III co " E I EKT/PARKING r t I ` EXTG BUILDING �_- /EXTOPARKING---- I I; �� I � in d I�` I �_1.,I 1� I, I CD F / 1 ( .1 I� t1'� I 111 4 TAX LOT I \ 1--.--..1 =-.. ...1.1 ---1 r-.--_ � i -- ' )Li 2S102CB01804 \ \\ .17(. P- _ err { I ,,., '\\ \\y'7 \\ ice%. 41 - - --- - �' ._�. _s. ...� = - ------ ; \\ j '" / TAX OT ` ,- _ = I - / A' -- -1 I E -;t5 t / ; NJ \\ / I / 2s102C 01802 :, I 1 1 6� J" I' \ 1 / -- -___ �� II . II I• PRO JECT BOUNDARY \ ! E)(TQ E-'�/p'."/ �_ /� \ II (TYP) Ce '///� I % I 1 '' Q / E7(TG PARKING.' ‘..._7 - _ -�-•�' �I I � O O ; lllT7T))){ �' 1 11fAI �I -�� 'Iii lil �, i 11 / ,I i i I 1 , " J'I II _____.z�a. =__a=_.mss = —— _ J' I'; I I ��' ¢ n / II .J . • N33'1517'E 249.15 _�—_/.__-�_� d p �� V. � LL - ' er - _ —• -- --- -----4:-- r.:.-----.-,'— ..=-__°. •r--4----- 1 -- _ .._! ,_-. O p_ L al \ �\ \ Exrcc \ ExroS T \ \ ¢ 1 SIDEWALK BIKE LANE % \ N. �� , d O ("3 LU \ `o!\— — i \I SW PACIFIC HIGHWAY \ \i \ z i- § 1 "_ ..1 (I/UBLIC-ASPHALT) 1 \ — _.._\._.._ F- O o -�- -- ) - --�s -3 o . w / • 7 _ _ ._ / /. _. —/ 8 I- U f :11 1____,04: '. / / / I • \ r 11L1IzT $, DESIGNED'. ,.....t.,•7 _ --II 1L -(.,I— r \ //// . o , , ' I ,�-(vim- MPA P., -'`. �� r - - CHECKED: i _ / JAN `� �" /// SCALE: 1) ! N:1'=20' 1'', Scale 1" = 20' r:w^ L '. I I I 20 10 0 20 40 60 SEPT 09.2009 F I- t 4 1 I 3050-00 U SHEET SP1.0 • • A U L__ __I L i . 1 J 555 O 3s1 N %, _. 0 Z 0 frl II i S I_ _I 0 1 I �,�-s.}.Yaw. -;-'41.'i ,. • 5 A.. : _ . ,. ,`v , vin t Located In The SW Y4, Sec. 2, T2S, R1 W,W.M. ,, n N'-` '-IN_y : r .+ t ,..t . "'Ft 4±!L 4., cN \\ /// \ /// \\ /// \\i// '..,zd Iar. YT, .f r�,,,�, '4 #� \\) -.. \�/ _ - VICINITY MAP a /// � Y---, __�_— NOT TO SCALE 0 — L71/< n , r � __ — i 1 � V ``' l / - kT1HiT1 _ E// {y., i •0 - -� z A.-.: 11\1)/ r________ i N33°15't 7'E 181.23' 1i g, TRASH ENCLOSURE m - , 200 SF ,� I I (� I g_ _ C, 7 �xS .'EASEMENT I CO E r 's ii 11 LO (TFP) RE / -_- _--- \ PROPOSED --- " „ 1, o_ I �1 517E INFORMATION: 0_ I1 1 I _ AUTOZONE BUILDING 1+--_— I I (� < rn a OO ±6785 SF _ ' 1S TOTAL SITE AREA 38,791 SF 0.85 AC TT i 10 1 I: \ ____ (TYP) I � I, i TOTAL BUILDING AREA 8,785 SF 0.18 AC O \ $ 20 \, 1■ O 1{, DR1 % TOTAL PAVED AREA 23,813 SF 0.55 AC •1 Cr) \ $ -i- (TMP> E° AISLE .i I TOTAL LANDSCAPE AREA 8,193 SF 0.14 AC 0 p� \ \ // \ / _ l °�i 7/ 1 1 , I), -, TOTAL PARKING 31 SPACES(2 HC SPACES) / �) L./ W ii o �J i• -(-::-.3 r 3 = LANDSCAPE AREA "' _ \• /•I' ,4 1II (gyp.. �..��p PROJECT LIMITS O \\\\ / °g (TVP) _ry',C (TVP) 11 ` 1 'u (7YP) Cle O Z 3 I x r` PROPOSED ' 11 (O� N // •/ �� tiw / 111 , I i- 6 t .L... EXTG'PUBLIC_ ! -6_-._-_--„z-_-_:__ _ _ //V 4 /, :1,I 'at1 i '- _ 0 t ii 1, STORAGE"SIGN ) _- _ - __�---- i/ N}1555�7i249.14 F Cl_ \ \ °� « E SIDEWALK r 5' L NE \ — \ U '. \ b `, 4- SW PACIFIC HIGHWAY \�- N \ .\_.._. 1-'. _.,_. \ .°_s_.._.._ - 5 =Il \ \� \ _..— (PUBLIC-ASPHALT) is \ — \.._.. — 2 II / ,f / ,. /.—.._. _.._ -- _ _ _ -•.-/-_'.._'.. .. /._.. — o I- —. / 1 ..._....._.,-,L..._.._7.._ - — _/....._.. _ — J U 11 // / /ti / / i / 7.:._.. / y �_ a / / - (n / . ' , / -11 p.F-a-= n-�- J/ / / J/ 1 „,==. \ ( �3� DESIGNED'.eV o / /._ r -tom-' — g -'t T,----_--- $r �(�j// - da-- _ 91■9_ ��_ I--1M j/ DRAWN: O sue / Y- _ IF1 /r- MPA___ U `` / •I! i ` , ;� CHECKED: JAN SCALE:• F ,1� t' Scale 1" = 20' V:N!A Q. I I 1 20 10 0 20 40 I,0 SEPT 09,2009 I ( I I 3050 00 W SHLE1 SP2.0 Filing Fee A check has been submitted with this application paying the filing fee in full. CITY OF TIGARD RECEIPT 4 c 13125 SW Hall Blvd.,Tigard OR 97223 503.639.4171 TIGARD Receipt Number: 175158 - 09/10/2009 CASE NO. FEE DESCRIPTION REVENUE ACCOUNT NUMBER PAID PRE2009-00029 Pre-Application Conference 1003100-43116 $326.00 PRE2009-00029 Pre-Application Conference-LRP 1003100-43117 $47.00 Total: $373.00 PAYMENT METHOD CHECK# CC AUTH. CODE ACCT ID CASHIER ID RECEIPT DATE RECEIPT AMT Check 491535 STREAT 09/10/2009 $373 00 Payor: AutoZone Total Payments: $373.00 Balance Due: $0.00 Page 1 of 1 Filing Fee A check is included with this submission,paying the fee in full. FEE SCHEDULE Planning Fees: Under$1,000,000 $ 4,445.00 Total $ 4,44500 Preliminary Storm Report Includes:Preliminary Stormwater Calculations 110 PRELIMINARY DRAINAGE REPORT AutoZone Prepared For: AutoZone, Inc. 123 S. Front Street Memphis,TN 38103 IIPrepared By: HDJDESIGN GROUP engineers I landscape architects I planners I surveyors 300 W 15th Street Vancouver, WA 98660 (360) 695-3488 December 7, 2009 7 TABLE OF CONTENTS I+ CERTIFICATE OF ENGINEER 1 SECTION 1: PROJECT DESCRIPTION 2 SECTION 2: PRE-DEVELOPMENT CONDITIONS 3 Site Topography 3 Abutting Property Land Cover and Use 3 Natural and Constructed Channels 3 On-Site Soil Conditions 3 Pre-Development Sub-basin Description 3 Points of Discharge for Pre-Development Drainage 4 Pre-Development Site Flow Summary 4 SECTION 3: HYDROLOGIC ANALYSIS 4 Analysis Method and Design Parameters 5 SECTION 4: POST-DEVELOPMENT CONDITIONS 5 Post Development Sub-Basin Description 5 Points of Discharge for Post-Development Drainage 6 Post-Development Site Flow Summary 6 SECTION 5: WATER QUALITY/QUANTITY FACILITY 7 iSECTION 6: REFERENCES 7 INDEX OF FIGURES Figure 1 Vicinity Map 2 INDEX OF TABLES Table 1 Pre-Development Drainage Basin Characteristics 3 Table 2 Pre-Development Runoff Flows 4 Table 3 Rainfall Event Design Parameters 5 Table 4 Post- Development Runoff Flows 5 Table 5 Pre and Post Development On-site Runoff Flow Comparison 6 APPENDIX A Soils Information SCS Curve Numbers APPENDIX B Basin Delineation Maps HydroCAD Model Pre— Development 10, 25 and 100 year Storm Events Post— Development 10, 25 and 100 year Storm Events ID Certificate of Engineer AutoZone Drainage Report The technical information and data contained in this report was prepared under the direction and supervision of the undersigned, whose seal, as a professional engineer licensed to practice as such, is affixed below. This document was approved by: I PROFESS 448o8r r1GINFF /O �, q 2 A OREGON 0 .�^• 13,2Q�Q�Q- G. tON EXPIRES: 12/31p, : 1 Thomas G. Lo ergan, P.E. • aSection 1: Project Description AutoZone Incorporated proposes to redevelop the existing commercial property to better suit an auto parts retail business. The site address is 13405 SW Pacific Highway, tax lot 2S102CB01802, in the City of Tigard. The property has an existing structure and paved drives and parking. The business was formerly a commercial restaurant. AutoZone proposes to demolish the present structure and parking lot and build a new structure and parking area to better meet its business needs. The project will meet minimum landscape area requirements. The lot size is 0.84 acres. See Figure 1 for a vicinity map. Figure 1: Vicinity Map \eG G QP Ak co a 0 z SW PARK ST 1111® iii N\ al'. SITE TIGARD MARKETPLACE SW GAARDE ST - SW MCDONALD ST \G Qr • HD! Design Group PLLC 12/7/2009 AutoZone-Drainage Report Page 2 Section 2: Pre-Development Conditions Site Topography The site has a 3,700 square foot structure, graded asphalt parking lot and driveways with two catch basins to collect storm runoff. The frontage of Pacific Highway slopes from southwest to northeast at an average slope of approximately 3.5 percent. Abutting Property Land Cover and Use Abutting properties are all developed. They are a Public Storage facility to the south and west and a Taco Bell restaurant to the north. Natural and Constructed Channels There are no channels on the site. On-Site Soil Conditions No geotechnical explorations were performed at the site. The Natural Resources Soils Survey maps the area as Quatama Loam (Hydrologic Soil Group C) for the entire site. See Appendix A for a copy of the soils map for the site. Pre-Development Sub-basin Description The entire site drains to the ODOT conveyance system within Highway 99W (Pacific Highway). Four basins were delineated on site - the North, South, Roof, and North Driveway - for a total of 0.93 acres. Table 1 includes a description of the basins and areas. Table 1 Pre-Development Drainage Basin Characteristics Basin ID Impervious Area Pervious Area Total Area (Pavement/Sidewalk, Roof) (sf) (Landscaping) (sf) (sf) 1S 18,524 2,477 21,001 (South Basin) 2S 7,526 1,269 8,795 (North Basin) 3S 5,087 0 5,087 (Roof) 4S 3,464 2,511 5,975 (North Driveway) Total Site 34,601 6,257 40,858 S HDJ Design Group PLLC 12/7/2009 AutoZone-Drainage Report Page 3 Points of Discharge for Pre-Development Drainage Pre-development onsite drainage for the south basin, roof, and north basin discharges via onsite conveyance to a flow control vault located in the landscape area directly in front of the project site. This flow control vault conveys stormwater into a catch basin located in SW Pacific Highway. It appears that the south basin and roof flows enter the flow control vault behind a weir wall with orifices. This weir wall extends vertically from just a couple of inches below the top of the grate to half a foot from the bottom of the vault. Thus, there exists a 6" by 30" rectangular vertical opening at the base of the weir. Approximately 5" up from the bottom of the weir, there exists a 3" diameter orifice. It can be seen from the HydroCad modeling that even during the 100-year, 24 hour storm event, water does not back up far enough to flow through the 3" orifice. All of the runoff is flowing under the weir. It appears that the 4" conveyance pipe which picks up runoff from the north basin area drain does not enter the flow control vault behind the weir. It enters in front of the weir, unrestricted. However, for ease of modeling, this pipe is shown to enter behind the weir, as it makes little difference to the results. It may be noted that another pipe enters in front of the weir. This pipe appears to convey water from an underground detention system for the public storage facility, to the south. The pipe was not modeled — it is assumed that existing conditions are acceptable. As for the north driveway basin, this basin drains overland to another catch basin in SW Pacific Highway, located just north of the site Pre-Development Site Flow Summary Table 2 summarizes the pre-development flows. Additional information is found in Appendix B- HydroCAD Model. Table 2 Pre-Development Runoff Flows Storm Event- Flow in cfs Sub-Basin ID Area (sf) 10-year 25-year 100-year 1S 21,001 0.37 0.41 0.50 2S 8,795 0.15 0.17 0.21 3S 5,087 0.09 0.10 0.13 4S 5,975 0.08 0.09 0.12 Total peak flow from control 0.61 0.67 0.83 vault* (1S, 2S and 3S) Total peak flow from north driveway (4S) 0.08 0.09 0.12 Total peak flow from whole site (1S, 2S, 3S and 4S) 0.69 0.77 0.96 • *Runoff contributions from on-site flow only, not off-site HDJ Design Group PLLC 12/7/2009 AutoZone-Drainage Report Page 4 Section 3: Hydrologic Analysis Analysis Method and Design Parameters The analysis for this site was completed using HydroCAD v9. This computer model uses SCS TR-20 methodologies to calculate storm runoff and peaks. Table 3 lists the rainfall event design parameters used in the hydraulic analysis per Clean Water Services Design and Construction Standards. Table 3 Rainfall Event Design Parameters Rainfall Event Storm Type&Duration Depth (in) 2-year Type 1A-24 hr. 2.30 10-year Type 1A-24 hr. 3.40 25-year Type 1A-24 hr. 3.70 100-year Type 1A-24 hr. 4.50 Section 4: Post-Development Conditions Post-Development Sub-Basin Description The post-development sub-basin layout of the site follows the pre-development sub- basin layout. Post-development area calculations were adjusted to account for the proposed grading at the site and the proposed 12' right-of-way dedication to ODOT. Table 4 includes a description of the basins and areas. Table 4 Post-Development Drainage Basin Characteristics Basin ID Impervious Area Pervious Area Total Area (Pavement/Sidewalk, Roof) (sf) (Landscaping) (sf) (sf) 1S 12,132 2,020 14,152 (South Basin) 2S 7,616 249 7,865 (North Basin) 3S 6,786 0 6,786 (Roof) 4S 5,002 3,711 8,713 (North Driveway) Total Site 31,536 5,980 37,516 HDJ Design Group PLLC 12/7/2009 AutoZone-Drainage Report Page 5 Points of Discharge for Post-Development Drainage A new conveyance system is proposed to collect runoff from the basins. Runoff from the south basin, north basin, and roof will all be conveyed to the existing flow control vault, behind the weir wall. The north driveway basin will still drain via overland flow to another catch basin in SW Pacific Highway, located just north of the site. Post-Development Site Flow Summary Table 5 summarizes the post-development flows for the on-site and off-site basins. Table 6 compares pre- and post-development flows for the basins. Additional information is found in Appendix B- HydroCAD Model. Table 5 Post-Development Runoff Flows Storm Event- Flow in cfs Sub-Basin ID Area (sf) 10-year 25-year 100-year 1S 14,152 0.24 0.27 0.33 2S 7,865 0.14 0.16 0.19 3S 6,786 0.13 0.14 0.17 4S 8,713 0.12 0.14 0.18 Total peak flow from orifices in control vault (1S, 2S, and 3S) 0.46 0.50 0.61 Total peak flow from north 0.12 0.14 0.18 driveway(4S) Total peak flow from whole site (15, 2S, 3S and 4S) 0.58 0.64 0.79 Table 6 Pre- and Post-Development On-Site Runoff Flow Comparison Storm Event-flow in cfs Basin 10-year 25-year 100-year Pre Post Pre Post Pre Post 15,25, and 3S 0.61 0.46 0.67 0.50 0.83 0.61 4S 0.08 0.12 0.09 0.14 0.12 0.18 Net Change -0.11 -0.12 -0.16 It may be noted that less total runoff is leaving the site in proposed conditions than in existing conditions. This may primarily be attributed to the fact that the proposed site is smaller than the existing site, due to the proposed 12' wide right-of-way dedication to ODOT along the property frontage. The project is no longer responsible for runoff from all this area. HDJ Design Group PLLC 12/7/2009 AutoZone-Drainage Report Page 6 Section 5: Water Quality/Quantity Facility It does not appear that runoff from the existing site is currently being treated before entering the public storm system. However, this project proposes to introduce treatment to the site, in the form of media filtration cartridges, such as StormFilter, to treat the water quality storm runoff from the pavement surfaces. Section 6: References CWS. June 2007. Design and Construction Standards for Sanitary Sewer and Surface Water Management. Clean Water Services, Hillsboro, OR. HydroCAD. Version 9. 2009 HydroCAD Software Solutions LLC. • 110 HDJ Design Group PLLC 12/7/2009 AutoZone-Drainage Report Page 7 • APPENDIX A Soils Information SCS Curve Numbers 1 • Soil Map—Washington County,Oregon N V p N ali516840 516860 516880 516900 516920 516940 516960 516980 517000 45'25'26" 45°25'26" * Alt o *; 2 M1 11• tL7� i O p t Am, :� - Jr ,.: , ka: N O p O 2 .J I;..",,,. . O `- O - •., - r ° o " to k,, o 0 i 0 1. co / '1,.. i // g,' 0 . , . 1pil . ; .:,'). ,S,. 4" Ili' o., co N I .yw N I d N o yy iiiir. lir 141, 8 ia 0 - 4111016 E so., n 10'414 A 1114 o w' AI 0 iD 45°25'19" ° - ° 45°25 19" 516840 516860 516880 516900 516920 516940 5169E0 516930 51 "0 n Map Scale:1,1 0608pnntedonAsize(8.5"x11')sheet . v N N 1 Meters 0 10 20 40 60 Feet 0 40 80 160 240 USDA Natural Resources Web Soil Survey 12/7/2009 ■ • Conservation Service National Cooperative Soil Survey Page 1 of 3 Hydrologic Soil Group-Washington County,Oregon II Hydrologic Soil Group Hydrologic Soil Group—Summary by Map Unit—Washington County,Oregon Map unit symbol Map unit name Rating Acres in AOI Percent of AOI 37A Quatama loam,0 to 3 C 5.4 100.0% percent slopes Totals for Area of Interest 5.4 100.0% Description Hydrologic soil groups are based on estimates of runoff potential. Soils are assigned to one of four groups according to the rate of water infiltration when the soils are not protected by vegetation, are thoroughly wet, and receive precipitation from long-duration storms. The soils in the United States are assigned to four groups(A, B, C, and D)and three dual classes (A/D, B/D, and C/D). The groups are defined as follows: Group A. Soils having a high infiltration rate(low runoff potential)when thoroughly wet. These consist mainly of deep,well drained to excessively drained sands or gravelly sands. These soils have a high rate of water transmission. ' Group B. Soils having a moderate infiltration rate when thoroughly wet. These consist chiefly of moderately deep or deep,moderately well drained or well drained soils that have moderately fine texture to moderately coarse texture.These soils have a moderate rate of water transmission. Group C. Soils having a slow infiltration rate when thoroughly wet. These consist chiefly of soils having a layer that impedes the downward movement of water or soils of moderately fine texture or fine texture.These soils have a slow rate of water transmission. Group D. Soils having a very slow infiltration rate(high runoff potential)when thoroughly wet.These consist chiefly of clays that have a high shrink-swell potential, soils that have a high water table, soils that have a claypan or clay layer at or near the surface, and soils that are shallow over nearly impervious material. These soils have a very slow rate of water transmission. If a soil is assigned to a dual hydrologic group (ND, B/D, or C/D), the first letter is for drained areas and the second is for undrained areas. Only the soils that in their natural condition are in group D are assigned to dual classes. Rating Options Aggregation Method: Dominant Condition Component Percent Cutoff: None Specified Tie-break Rule: Lower I. USDA Natural Resources Web Soil Survey 12/7/2009 �� Conservation Service National Cooperative Soil Survey Page 3 of 3 Chapter 2 Estimating Runoff Technical Release 55 Urban Hydrology for Small Watersheds I. Table 2-2a Runoff curve numbers for urban areas 1/ Curve numbers for Cover description hydrologic soil group Average percent Cover type and hydrologic condition impervious area 2/ A B C D Fully developed urban areas(vegetation established) Open space(lawns,parks,golf courses,cemeteries,etc.)y: Poor condition(grass cover<50%) 68 79 89 Fair condition(grass cover 50%to 75%) 49 69 84 Good condition(grass cover>75%) 39 61 74 80 Impervious areas: Paved parking lots,roofs,driveways,etc. (excluding right-of-way) 98 98 (3) 98 Streets and roads: Paved;curbs and storm sewers(excluding right-of-way) 98 98 98 98 Paved;open ditches(including right-of-way) 83 89 92 93 Gravel(including right-of-way) 76 85 89 91 Dirt(including right-of-way) 72 82 87 89 Western desert urban areas: Natural desert landscaping(pervious areas only)-4/ 63 77 85 88 Artificial desert landscaping(impervious weed barrier, 0 desert shrub with 1-to 2-inch sand or gravel mulch and basin borders) 96 96 96 96 Urban districts: Commercial and business 85 89 92 94 95 Industrial 72 81 88 91 93 Residential districts by average lot size: 1/8 acre or less(town houses) 65 77 86 90 92 1/4 acre 38 61 76 83 87 1t3 acre 30 57 72 81 86 1/2 acre 25 54 70 80 85 1 acre 20 51 68 79 84 2 acres • 12 46 65 77 82 Developing urban areas Newly graded areas (pervious areas only,no vegetation)5/ 77 86 91 94 Idle lands(CN's are determined using cover types similar to those in table 2-2c). 1 Average runoff condition,and I.=0.2S. 2 The average percent impervious area shown was used to develop the composite CN's.Other assumptions are as follows:impervious areas are directly connected to the drainage system,impervious areas have a CN of 98,and pervious areas are considered equivalent to open space in good hydrologic condition.CN's for other combinations of conditions may be computed using figure 2-3 or 2-4. 3 CN's shown are equivalent to those of pasture.Composite CN's may be computed for other combinations of open space cover type. 4 Composite CN's for natural desert landscaping should be computed using figures 2-3 or 2-4 based on the impervious area percentage (CN=98)and the pervious area CN.The pervious area CN's are assumed equivalent to desert shrub in poor hydrologic condition. 5 Composite CN's to use for the design of temporary measures during grading and construction should be computed using figure 2-3 or 2-4 based on the degree of development(impervious area percentage)and the CN's for the newly graded pervious areas. III (210-V1-TR-55,Second Ed.,June 1986) 2-5 10 APPENDIX B Basin Delineation Maps HydroCAD Model (Pre— Development 10, 25 and 100 year Storm Events Post— Development 10, 25 and 100 year Storm Events) III / 7,, 'k / % Drainage Basin Legend PROPERTY LINE (TYP) • • -�\ I % Sub-basin Divide i e i .ml 1 c� - sT �\ TACO Extg Surface ' Flow Direction I ,a,1 `� BELL II -}- ' • \ \ SITE HydroCAD Reference Symbols •.-.i d y S� � ( ir Sub-basin ID 0 /1 �°� s1r Reach ID I/ , R�: ,��I ` I Sir a Ponding Area ID Y �1 / �`a I • - \ \:-- ,---- \ r / ■ Sr %•).' �' � \�a� r ; A \ -wit , Qy ' 40 • sAt,. . 'Al. / ,, ,• •, • ,)\ <S Yt.: ,f \7 V1 *'`.,I i_fi , , ,, /t V # ;,. --.. / ' 9/Nts/.. '/. / 1 \ . .-s. f, ' � -.� ' , �-` ;` A . \ ' i i, Qii 1,.....„ , ,‘ . x,,,,I - \ \ \ Z� ` / \ ��. : ' , ' . /,':014X,/ ,' . i . \ \' \ f� , \ Ali / •t /t2/ ,' `C i , 4 pi d \ ` 11 PROPERTY 1 `4p %",/ % y� ,:-``>. 11-/■ V,\t/ LINE (TYP) I\I\\ \ \;yd� i, `-tEXTG-}R/— ;`\ ,%".-' PUBLI — 4/ ♦ i SITE �- �'�� /��-'•. -'4,-.4.,,,:";-),V_ , % EXTG CONTOURS fi 15 / n TYP 'S is l' '� ,'' '� N r ' a I k \e' \, , 4 I 1 Y 3011W,5;=•s' Pre-Development Basin Delineation Map I HD ` Vancouver WA 986602927 360/695.3488 563/924-8005 360/695-8767 fax Scale: 1"=40' I Date: 12/03/09 I AutoZone DESIGN GROUP °BP14 d,°°�• ^i1PQS n1dooPiS .ems„ ^ Reference: Appendix B I HD Job#: 3050-00 I Drawing: 1 of 2 \ t Drainage Basin Legend �/ / Sub-basin Divide � , , , �. PROPERTY LINE TYP ' — —- \ TACO Proposed Surface � Flow Direction sr \� BELL • r HydroCAD Reference Symbols:_f SITE • \ �s • \ sr ��s Sub-basin ID \, •> s> sT Reach ID ® sr ��\� \S,, a Ponding Area ID A ISI m ® 'ti► 4sa . / / a�0 /%.01,,,„, I ■•,,i,s.# a -,,<.,. . , ,, , „, ,, ,,, / ‘ / / ,/ _ . mizit s # II 1 ,ice, - !' c, , 1 I ♦� �J . /t • , „, : , „ ,„ � _ Jtt 41) • ill1i�� ;• / • ; /• I 4 4$00S' ll i tf ;' `• ,,,7%\%%..%%.„. i ,', ,,' . %.441 / A ' ! ' t , 444iiii i I " N447 ; # ' i 1 . ..;I,' o' / * ,./....., II i t / I PROPOSED �i /'� ...f, CONTOUR (TYP) / ' PROPERTY (, ri t %EXTG °1W , •tt ''�. f LINE (TYP) F ri • / PUBLI — t , •tip- ; /' s t % t ---. STOR GE ,S ',S d.. , -... ! : , tt /�.....� I SITE -- �'s e� ,,.„ .L.s., �.1 / / n o" 1 1 I/ r'/ TT y 300 rh8sheet Post-Development Basin Delineation Map Y Vancouver,WA 98660.2927 360lfi9S3468 503/694-0'05 360/695-E767 fax Scale: 1"=40' I Date: 12/03/09 I AutoZone DESIGN GROUP °° .„,.,..0,., ,, e,a°°„ , . ° -m^ Reference: Appendix B I HD Job#: 3050-00 I Drawing: 2 of 2 ID 0 Roo 0 1R 0 South Parking Ar North Pa king Area 3" of Drain II 1P AN Parking Lot Sto a arking Lot Storage (4S) ce North Driveway 3P Control CB 0 (Subca) Reach 'on* Drainage Diagram for 3050 Predev Prepared by Hopper Dennis Jellison, PLLC, Printed 12/3/2009 HydroCAD®9.00 s/n 00668 ©2009 HydroCAD Software Solutions LLC 3050 Predev Prepared by Hopper Dennis Jellison, PLLC Printed 12/3/2009 HydroCAD®9.00 s/n 00668 ©2009 HydroCAD Software Solutions LLC Page 2 Area Listing (all nodes) Area CN Description (acres) (subcatchment-numbers) 0.115 80 Landscape (1S, 4S) 0.029 80 Landscaping (2S) 0.173 98 Pavement and Sidewalk (2S) 0.080 98 Pavement/SW (4S) 0.425 98 Pavement/sidewalk (1S) 0.117 98 Roof (3S) 0.938 TOTAL AREA 4111 3050 Predev Prepared by Hopper Dennis Jellison, PLLC Printed 12/3/2009 • HydroCAD®9.00 s/n 00668 ©2009 HydroCAD Software Solutions LLC Page 3 Pipe Listing (all nodes) Line# Node In-Invert Out-Invert Length Slope n Diam/Width Height Number (feet) (feet) (feet) (ft/ft) (inches) (inches) 1 1R 232.50 229.50 150.0 0.0200 0.013 3.0 0.0 2 1P 229.20 228.90 28.0 0.0107 0.013 6.0 0.0 3 2P 229.50 228.90 78.0 0.0077 0.013 4.0 0.0 4 3P 228.80 229.10 8.0 -0.0375 0.013 8.0 0.0 II di, 3050 Predev Type IA 24-hr 10 Year Rainfall=3.40" Prepared by Hopper Dennis Jellison, PLLC Printed 12/3/2009 iir HydroCAD®9.00 s/n 00668 ©2009 HydroCAD Software Solutions LLC Page 4 Time span=1.00-24.00 hrs, dt=0.05 hrs, 461 points Runoff by SCS TR-20 method, UH=SCS Reach routing by Stor-Ind+Trans method - Pond routing by Stor-Ind method Subcatchment 1S: South Parking Area Runoff Area=21.001 sf 88.21% Impervious Runoff Depth>2.94" Tc=6.0 min CN=96 Runoff=0.37 cfs 0.118 af Subcatchment 2S: North Parking Area Runoff Area=8,795 sf 85.57% Impervious Runoff Depth>2.84" Tc=6.0 min CN=95 Runoff=0.15 cfs 0.048 af Subcatchment 3S: Roof Runoff Area=5,087 sf 100.00% Impervious Runoff Depth>3.16" Tc=6.0 min CN=98 Runoff=0.09 cfs 0.031 af Subcatchment 4S: North Driveway Runoff Area=5,975 sf 57.97% Impervious Runoff Depth>2.35" Tc=6.0 min CN=90 Runoff=0.08 cfs 0.027 af Reach 1R: 3" Roof Drain Avg. Depth=0.16' Max Vet=2.80 fps Inflow=0.09 cfs 0.031 af 3.0" Round Pipe n=0.013 L=150.0' S=0.0200 '/' Capacity=0.12 cfs Outflow=0.09 cfs 0.031 af Pond 1P: Parking Lot Storage Peak Elev=231.06' Storage=2 cf Inflow=0.46 cfs 0.149 af Outflow=0.46 cfs 0.149 af Pond 2P: Parking Lot Storage Peak EIev=231.03' Storage=0 cf Inflow=0.15 cfs 0.048 af Outflow=0.15 cfs 0.048 af 4 Pond 3P: Control CB Peak EIev=229.57' Inflow=0.61 cfs 0.197 af Outflow=0.61 cfs 0.197 af Total Runoff Area = 0.938 ac Runoff Volume = 0.224 af Average Runoff Depth = 2.86" 15.31% Pervious = 0.144 ac 84.69% Impervious= 0.794 ac 1 3050 Predev Type IA 24-hr 10 Year Rainfall=3.40" Prepared by Hopper Dennis Jellison, PLLC Printed 12/3/2009 HydroCAD® 9.00 s/n 00668 ©2009 HydroCAD Software Solutions LLC Page 5 Summary for Subcatchment 1 S: South Parking Area Runoff = 0.37 cfs @ 7.88 hrs, Volume= 0.118 af, Depth> 2.94" Runoff by SCS TR-20 method, UH=SCS, Time Span= 1.00-24.00 hrs, dt= 0.05 hrs Type IA 24-hr 10 Year Rainfall=3.40" Area (sf) CN Description 2,477 80 Landscape 18,524 98 Pavement/sidewalk 21,001 96 Weighted Average 2,477 11.79% Pervious Area 18,524 88.21% Impervious Area Tc Length Slope Velocity Capacity Description (min) (feet) (ft/ft) (ft/sec) (cfs) 6.0 Direct Entry, Estimated Tc Summary for Subcatchment 2S: North Parking Area Runoff = 0.15 cfs @ 7.89 hrs, Volume= 0.048 af, Depth> 2.84" Runoff by SCS TR-20 method, UH=SCS, Time Span= 1.00-24.00 hrs, dt= 0.05 hrs VP Type IA 24-hr 10 Year Rainfall=3.40" Area (sf) CN Description 1,269 80 Landscaping 7,526 98 Pavement and Sidewalk 8,795 95 Weighted Average 1,269 14.43% Pervious Area 7,526 85.57% Impervious Area Tc Length Slope Velocity Capacity Description (min) (feet) (ft/ft) (ft/sec) (cfs) 6.0 Direct Entry, Estimated Tc Summary for Subcatchment 3S: Roof Runoff = 0.09 cfs © 7.87 hrs, Volume= 0.031 af, Depth> 3.16" Runoff by SCS TR-20 method, UH=SCS, Time Span= 1.00-24.00 hrs, dt= 0.05 hrs Type IA 24-hr 10 Year Rainfall=3.40" Area (sf) CN Description 5,087 98 Roof 5,087 100.00% Impervious Area • 3050 Predev Type IA 24-hr 10 Year Rainfall=3.40" Prepared by Hopper Dennis Jellison, PLLC Printed 12/3/2009 4r HydroCAD®9.00 s/n 00668 ©2009 HydroCAD Software Solutions LLC Page 6 Tc Length Slope Velocity Capacity Description (min) (feet) (ft/ft) (ft/sec) (cfs) 6.0 Direct Entry, Estimated Tc Summary for Subcatchment 4S: North Driveway Runoff = 0.08 cfs @ 7.92 hrs, Volume= 0.027 af, Depth> 2.35" Runoff by SCS TR-20 method, UH=SCS, Time Span= 1.00-24.00 hrs, dt= 0.05 hrs Type IA 24-hr 10 Year Rainfall=3.40" Area (sf) CN Description 3,464 98 Pavement/SW 2,511 80 Landscape 5,975 90 Weighted Average 2,511 42.03% Pervious Area 3,464 57.97% Impervious Area Tc Length Slope Velocity Capacity Description (min) (feet) (ft/ft) (ft/sec) (cfs) 6.0 Direct Entry, Estimated Tc Summary for Reach 1R: 3" Roof Drain Inflow Area = 0.117 ac,100.00% Impervious, Inflow Depth > 3.16" for 10 Year event Inflow = 0.09 cfs @ 7.87 hrs, Volume= 0.031 af Outflow = 0.09 cfs @ 7.90 hrs, Volume= 0.031 af, Atten= 0%, Lag= 1.6 min Routing by Stor-Ind+Trans method, Time Span= 1.00-24.00 hrs, dt= 0.05 hrs Max. Velocity= 2.80 fps, Min. Travel Time= 0.9 min Avg. Velocity = 1.69 fps, Avg. Travel Time= 1.5 min Peak Storage= 5 cf @ 7.88 hrs, Average Depth at Peak Storage= 0.16' Bank-Full Depth= 0.25', Capacity at Bank-Full= 0.12 cfs 3.0" Round Pipe n= 0.013 Length= 150.0' Slope= 0.0200 '/' Inlet Invert= 232.50', Outlet Invert= 229.50' 3050 Predev Type IA 24-hr 10 Year Rainfall=3.40" Prepared by Hopper Dennis Jellison, PLLC Printed 12/3/2009 HydroCAD® 9.00 s/n 00668 ©2009 HydroCAD Software Solutions LLC Page 7 Summary for Pond 1 P: Parking Lot Storage Inflow Area = 0.599 ac, 90.51% Impervious, Inflow Depth > 2.98" for 10 Year event Inflow = 0.46 cfs @ 7.89 hrs, Volume= 0.149 af Outflow = 0.46 cfs @ 7.88 hrs, Volume= 0.149 af, Atten= 0%, Lag= 0.0 min Primary = 0.46 cfs @ 7.88 hrs, Volume= 0.149 af Routing by Stor-Ind method, Time Span= 1.00-24.00 hrs, dt= 0.05 hrs Peak Elev= 231.06' © 7.88 hrs Surf.Area= 71 sf Storage= 2 cf Plug-Flow detention time= 0.1 min calculated for 0.149 af (100% of inflow) Center-of-Mass det. time= 0.1 min ( 682.3 - 682.3 ) Volume Invert Avail.Storage Storage Description #1 231.00' 3,178 cf Custom Stage Data (Prismatic) Listed below (Recalc) Elevation Surf.Area Inc.Store Cum.Store (feet) (sq-ft) (cubic-feet) (cubic-feet) 231.00 5 0 0 232.00 1,050 528 528 233.00 4,250 2,650 3,178 Device Routing Invert Outlet Devices ' #1 Primary 229.20' 6.0" Round Culvert L= 28.0' Ke= 0.500 Outlet Invert= 228.90' S= 0.0107 '/' Cc= 0.900 n= 0.013 #2 Device 1 231.00' 2.4" x 24.0" Horiz. Orifice/Grate X 10.00 C= 0.600 in 24.0" x 30.0" Grate Limited to weir flow at low heads Primary OutFlow Max=0.46 cfs @ 7.88 hrs HW=231.06' (Free Discharge) L1=Culvert (Passes 0.46 cfs of 1.05 cfs potential flow) L2=Orifice/Grate (Weir Controls 0.46 cfs @ 0.82 fps) Summary for Pond 2P: Parking Lot Storage Inflow Area = 0.202 ac, 85.57% Impervious, Inflow Depth > 2.84" for 10 Year event Inflow = 0.15 cfs @ 7.89 hrs, Volume= 0.048 of Outflow = 0.15 cfs @ 7.89 hrs, Volume= 0.048 af, Atten= 0%, Lag= 0.0 min Primary = 0.15 cfs @ 7.89 hrs, Volume= 0.048 af Routing by Stor-Ind method, Time Span= 1.00-24.00 hrs, dt= 0.05 hrs Peak Elev= 231.03' @ 7.89 hrs Surf.Area= 11 sf Storage= 0 cf Plug-Flow detention time= 0.0 min calculated for 0.048 af (100% of inflow) Center-of-Mass det. time= 0.0 min ( 697.4 - 697.4 ) Volume Invert Avail.Storage Storage Description #1 231.00' 31 cf Custom Stage Data (Prismatic) Listed below (Recalc) 4 3050 Predev Type IA 24-hr 10 Year Rainfall=3.40" Prepared by Hopper Dennis Jellison, PLLC Printed 12/3/2009 HydroCAD®9.00 s/n 00668 ©2009 HydroCAD Software Solutions LLC Page 8 Elevation Surf.Area Inc.Store Cum.Store (feet) (sq-ft) (cubic-feet) (cubic-feet) 231.00 4 0 0 231.50 120 31 31 Device Routing Invert Outlet Devices #1 Primary 229.50' 4.0" Round Culvert L= 78.0' Ke= 0.500 Outlet Invert= 228.90' S=0.0077 '/' Cc= 0.900 n= 0.013 Cast iron, coated #2 Device 1 231.00' 2.4" x 24.0" Horiz. Orifice/Grate X 10.00 C= 0.600 in 24.0" x 30.0" Grate Limited to weir flow at low heads Primary OutFlow Max=0.15 cfs @ 7.89 hrs HW=231.03' (Free Discharge) t-=Culvert (Passes 0.15 cfs of 0.27 cfs potential flow) 2=Orifice/Grate (Weir Controls 0.15 cfs @ 0.56 fps) Summary for Pond 3P: Control CB Inflow Area = 0.801 ac, 89.26% Impervious, Inflow Depth > 2.95" for 10 Year event Inflow = 0.61 cfs @ 7.88 hrs, Volume= 0.197 of Outflow = 0.61 cfs @ 7.88 hrs, Volume= 0.197 af, Atten= 0%, Lag= 0.0 min Primary = 0.61 cfs @ 7.88 hrs, Volume= 0.197 af Routing by Stor-Ind method, Time Span= 1.00-24.00 hrs, dt= 0.05 hrs t Peak Elev= 229.57' @ 7.88 hrs Device Routing Invert Outlet Devices #1 Primary 229.10' 8.0" Round Culvert L= 8.0' Ke= 0.500 Inlet Invert= 228.80' S= -0.0375 '/' Cc= 0.900 n= 0.013 Corrugated PE, smooth interior #2 Device 1 228.80' 30.0"W x 6.0" H Vert. Orifice/Grate C= 0.600 #3 Device 1 229.72' 3.0" Vert. Orifice/Grate C= 0.600 #4 Device 1 233.66' 2.5' long Sharp-Crested Rectangular Weir 2 End Contraction(s) Primary OutFlow Max=0.61 cfs @ 7.88 hrs HW=229.57' (Free Discharge) t-1=Culvert (Inlet Controls 0.61 cfs @ 2.33 fps) -2=Orifice/Grate (Passes 0.61 cfs of 3.93 cfs potential flow) -3=Orifice/Grate ( Controls 0.00 cfs) -4=Sharp-Crested Rectangular Weir ( Controls 0.00 cfs) 0 3050 Predev Type IA 24-hr 25 Year Rainfall=3.70" Prepared by Hopper Dennis Jellison, PLLC Printed 12/3/2009 10 HydroCAD©9.00 s/n 00668 ©2009 HydroCAD Software Solutions LLC Page 9 Time span=1.00-24.00 hrs, dt=0.05 hrs, 461 points Runoff by SCS TR-20 method, UH=SCS Reach routing by Stor-Ind+Trans method - Pond routing by Stor-Ind method Subcatchment 1S: South Parking Area Runoff Area=21.001 sf 88.21% Impervious Runoff Depth>3.24" Tc=6.0 min CN=96 Runoff=0.41 cfs 0.130 af Subcatchment 2S: North Parking Area Runoff Area=8,795 sf 85.57% Impervious Runoff Depth>3.13" Tc=6.0 min CN=95 Runoff=0.17 cfs 0.053 af Subcatchment 3S: Roof Runoff Area=5,087 sf 100.00% Impervious Runoff Depth>3.46" Tc=6.0 min CN=98 Runoff=0.10 cfs 0.034 af Subcatchment 4S: North Driveway Runoff Area=5,975 sf 57.97% Impervious Runoff Depth>2.63" Tc=6.0 min CN=90 Runoff=0.09 cfs 0.030 af Reach 1R: 3" Roof Drain Avg. Depth=0.17' Max Vet=2.84 fps Inflow=0.10 cfs 0.034 af 3.0" Round Pipe n=0.013 L=150.0' S=0.0200 '/' Capacity=0.12 cfs Outflow=0.10 cfs 0.034 af Pond 1P: Parking Lot Storage Peak EIev=231.07' Storage=3 cf Inflow=0.51 cfs 0.164 af Outflow=0.51 cfs 0.164 af Pond 2P: Parking Lot Storage Peak EIev=231.03' Storage=0 cf Inflow=0.17 cfs 0.053 af Outflow=0.17 cfs 0.053 af Pond 3P: Control CB Peak EIev=229.60' Inflow=0.67 cfs 0.216 af Outflow=0.67 cfs 0.216 af Total Runoff Area = 0.938 ac Runoff Volume =0.247 af Average Runoff Depth = 3.15" 15.31% Pervious = 0.144 ac 84.69% Impervious = 0.794 ac 3050 Predev Type IA 24-hr 25 Year Rainfall=3.70" Prepared by Hopper Dennis Jellison, PLLC Printed 12/3/2009 ir HydroCAD® 9.00 s/n 00668 ©2009 HydroCAD Software Solutions LLC Page 10 Summary for Subcatchment 1S: South Parking Area Runoff = 0.41 cfs @ 7.88 hrs, Volume= 0.130 af, Depth> 3.24" Runoff by SCS TR-20 method, UH=SCS, Time Span= 1.00-24.00 hrs, dt= 0.05 hrs Type IA 24-hr 25 Year Rainfall=3.70" Area (sf) CN Description 2,477 80 Landscape 18,524 98 Pavement/sidewalk 21,001 96 Weighted Average 2,477 11.79% Pervious Area 18,524 88.21% Impervious Area Tc Length Slope Velocity Capacity Description (min) (feet) (ft/ft) (ft/sec) (cfs) 6.0 Direct Entry, Estimated Tc Summary for Subcatchment 2S: North Parking Area Runoff = 0.17 cfs © 7.89 hrs, Volume= 0.053 af, Depth> 3.13" Runoff by SCS TR-20 method, UH=SCS, Time Span= 1.00-24.00 hrs, dt= 0.05 hrs Type IA 24-hr 25 Year Rainfall=3.70" Area (sf) CN Description 1,269 80 Landscaping 7,526 98 Pavement and Sidewalk 8,795 95 Weighted Average 1,269 14.43% Pervious Area 7,526 85.57% Impervious Area Tc Length Slope Velocity Capacity Description (min) (feet) (ft/ft) (ft/sec) (cfs) 6.0 Direct Entry, Estimated Tc Summary for Subcatchment 3S: Roof Runoff = 0.10 cfs @ 7.87 hrs, Volume= 0.034 af, Depth> 3.46" Runoff by SCS TR-20 method, UH=SCS, Time Span= 1.00-24.00 hrs, dt= 0.05 hrs Type IA 24-hr 25 Year Rainfall=3.70" Area (sf) CN Description 5,087 98 Roof 5,087 100.00% Impervious Area 0 3050 Predev Type IA 24-hr 25 Year Rainfall=3.70" Prepared by Hopper Dennis Jellison, PLLC Printed 12/3/2009 HydroCAD®9.00 s/n 00668 ©2009 HydroCAD Software Solutions LLC Page 11 Tc Length Slope Velocity Capacity Description (min) (feet) (ft/ft) (ft/sec) (cfs) 6.0 Direct Entry, Estimated Tc Summary for Subcatchment 4S: North Driveway Runoff = 0.09 cfs @ 7.92 hrs, Volume= 0.030 af, Depth> 2.63" Runoff by SCS TR-20 method, UH=SCS, Time Span= 1.00-24.00 hrs, dt= 0.05 hrs Type IA 24-hr 25 Year Rainfall=3.70" Area (sf) CN Description 3,464 98 Pavement/SW 2,511 80 Landscape 5,975 90 Weighted Average 2,511 42.03% Pervious Area 3,464 57.97% Impervious Area Tc Length Slope Velocity Capacity Description (min) (feet) (ft/ft) (ft/sec) (cfs) 6.0 Direct Entry, Estimated Tc Summary for Reach 1R: 3" Roof Drain Inflow Area = 0.117 ac,100.00% Impervious, Inflow Depth > 3.46" for 25 Year event Inflow = 0.10 cfs @ 7.87 hrs, Volume= 0.034 of Outflow = 0.10 cfs @ 7.90 hrs, Volume= 0.034 af, Atten= 0%, Lag= 1.6 min Routing by Stor-Ind+Trans method, Time Span= 1.00-24.00 hrs, dt= 0.05 hrs Max. Velocity= 2.84 fps, Min. Travel Time= 0.9 min Avg. Velocity= 1.73 fps, Avg. Travel Time= 1.4 min Peak Storage= 5 cf @ 7.88 hrs, Average Depth at Peak Storage= 0.17' Bank-Full Depth= 0.25', Capacity at Bank-Full= 0.12 cfs 3.0" Round Pipe n= 0.013 Length= 150.0' Slope= 0.0200 'P Inlet Invert= 232.50', Outlet Invert= 229.50' • 3050 Predev Type IA 24-hr 25 Year Rainfall=3.70" Prepared by Hopper Dennis Jellison, PLLC Printed 12/3/2009 HydroCAD®9.00 s/n 00668 ©2009 HydroCAD Software Solutions LLC Pace 12 Summary for Pond 1P: Parking Lot Storage Inflow Area = 0.599 ac, 90.51% Impervious, Inflow Depth > 3.28" for 25 Year event Inflow = 0.51 cfs @ 7.88 hrs, Volume= 0.164 af Outflow = 0.51 cfs @ 7.87 hrs, Volume= 0.164 af, Atten= 0%, Lag= 0.0 min Primary = 0.51 cfs @ 7.87 hrs, Volume= 0.164 af Routing by Stor-Ind method, Time Span= 1.00-24.00 hrs, dt= 0.05 hrs Peak Elev= 231.07' @ 7.87 hrs Surf.Area= 75 sf Storage= 3 cf Plug-Flow detention time= 0.1 min calculated for 0.164 af (100% of inflow) Center-of-Mass det. time= 0.1 min ( 679.2 - 679.1 ) Volume Invert Avail.Storage Storage Description #1 231.00' 3,178 cf Custom Stage Data(Prismatic) Listed below(Recalc) Elevation Surf.Area Inc.Store Cum.Store (feet) (sq-ft) (cubic-feet) (cubic-feet) 231.00 5 0 0 232.00 1,050 528 528 233.00 4,250 2,650 3,178 Device Routing Invert Outlet Devices , #1 Primary 229.20' 6.0" Round Culvert L= 28.0' Ke= 0.500 Outlet Invert= 228.90' S= 0.0107 'I' Cc= 0.900 n= 0.013 #2 Device 1 231.00' 2.4" x 24.0" Horiz. Orifice/Grate X 10.00 C= 0.600 in 24.0" x 30.0" Grate Limited to weir flow at low heads Primary OutFlow Max=0.50 cfs @ 7.87 hrs HW=231.07' (Free Discharge) t1=Culvert (Passes 0.50 cfs of 1.06 cfs potential flow) 'L2=Orifice/Grate (Weir Controls 0.50 cfs @ 0.84 fps) Summary for Pond 2P: Parking Lot Storage Inflow Area = 0.202 ac, 85.57% Impervious, Inflow Depth > 3.13" for 25 Year event Inflow = 0.17 cfs @ 7.89 hrs, Volume= 0.053 of Outflow = 0.17 cfs @ 7.88 hrs, Volume= 0.053 af, Atten= 0%, Lag= 0.0 min Primary = 0.17 cfs @ 7.88 hrs, Volume= 0.053 af Routing by Stor-Ind method, Time Span= 1.00-24.00 hrs, dt= 0.05 hrs Peak Elev= 231.03' @ 7.88 hrs Surf.Area= 11 sf Storage= 0 cf Plug-Flow detention time= 0.0 min calculated for 0.053 af(100% of inflow) Center-of-Mass det. time= 0.0 min (693.4- 693.4 ) Volume Invert Avail.Storage Storage Description #1 231.00' 31 cf Custom Stage Data (Prismatic) Listed below (Recalc) 3050 Predev Type IA 24-hr 25 Year Rainfall=3.70" Prepared by Hopper Dennis Jellison, PLLC Printed 12/3/2009 lb HydroCAD®9.00 s/n 00668 ©2009 HydroCAD Software Solutions LLC Page 13 Elevation Surf.Area Inc.Store Cum.Store (feet) (sq-ft) (cubic-feet) (cubic-feet) 231.00 4 0 0 231.50 120 31 31 Device Routing Invert Outlet Devices #1 Primary 229.50' 4.0" Round Culvert L= 78.0' Ke= 0.500 Outlet Invert= 228.90' S= 0.0077 '/' Cc= 0.900 n= 0.013 Cast iron, coated #2 Device 1 231.00' 2.4"x 24.0" Horiz. Orifice/Grate X 10.00 C= 0.600 in 24.0" x 30.0" Grate Limited to weir flow at low heads Primary OutFlow Max=0.17 cfs @ 7.88 hrs HW=231.03' (Free Discharge) t1Culvert (Passes 0.17 cfs of 0.27 cfs potential flow) 2=Orifice/Grate (Weir Controls 0.17 cfs @ 0.58 fps) Summary for Pond 3P: Control CB Inflow Area = 0.801 ac, 89.26% Impervious, Inflow Depth > 3.24" for 25 Year event Inflow = 0.67 cfs @ 7.88 hrs, Volume= 0.216 of Outflow = 0.67 cfs @ 7.88 hrs, Volume= 0.216 af, Atten= 0%, Lag= 0.0 min Primary = 0.67 cfs @ 7.88 hrs, Volume= 0.216 af / Routing by Stor-Ind method, Time Span= 1.00-24.00 hrs, dt= 0.05 hrs Peak Elev= 229.60' @ 7.88 hrs Device Routing Invert Outlet Devices #1 Primary 229.10' 8.0" Round Culvert L= 8.0' Ke= 0.500 Inlet Invert= 228.80' S=-0.0375 '/' Cc= 0.900 n= 0.013 Corrugated PE, smooth interior #2 Device 1 228.80' 30.0"W x 6.0" H Vert. Orifice/Grate C= 0.600 #3 Device 1 229.72' 3.0"Vert. Orifice/Grate C= 0.600 #4 Device 1 233.66' 2.5' long Sharp-Crested Rectangular Weir 2 End Contraction(s) Primary OutFlow Max=0.67 cfs @ 7.88 hrs HW=229.60' (Free Discharge) t =Culvert (Inlet Controls 0.67 cfs @ 2.41 fps) 2=Orifice/Grate (Passes 0.67 cfs of 4.07 cfs potential flow) 3=Orifice/Grate ( Controls 0.00 cfs) =Sharp-Crested Rectangular Weir ( Controls 0.00 cfs) 0 3050 Predev Type IA 24-hr 100 Year Rainfall=4.50" Prepared by Hopper Dennis Jellison, PLLC Printed 12/3/2009 HydroCAD®9.00 s/n 00668 ©2009 HydroCAD Software Solutions LLC Page 14 Time span=1.00-24.00 hrs, dt=0.05 hrs, 461 points Runoff by SCS TR-20 method, UH=SCS Reach routing by Stor-Ind+Trans method - Pond routing by Stor-Ind method Subcatchment 1S: South Parking Area Runoff Area=21.001 sf 88.21% Impervious Runoff Depth>4.03" Tc=6.0 min CN=96 Runoff=0.50 cfs 0.162 of Subcatchment 2S: North Parking Area Runoff Area=8,795 sf 85.57% Impervious Runoff Depth>3.92" Tc=6.0 min CN=95 Runoff=0.21 cfs 0.066 af Subcatchment 3S: Roof Runoff Area=5,087 sf 100.00% Impervious Runoff Depth>4.25" Tc=6.0 min CN=98 Runoff=0.13 cfs 0.041 af Subcatchment 4S: North Driveway Runoff Area=5,975 sf 57.97% Impervious Runoff Depth>3.39" Tc=6.0 min CN=90 Runoff=0.12 cfs 0.039 af Reach 1R: 3" Roof Drain Avg. Depth=0.21' Max Vet=2.90 fps Inflow=0.13 cfs 0.041 af 3.0" Round Pipe n=0.013 L=150.0' S=0.0200 '/' Capacity=0.12 cfs Outflow=0.13 cfs 0.041 af Pond 1P: Parking Lot Storage Peak EIev=231.08' Storage=3 cf Inflow=0.63 cfs 0.203 af Outflow=0.63 cfs 0.203 af Pond 2P: Parking Lot Storage Peak EIev=231.04' Storage=0 cf Inflow=0.21 cfs 0.066 af Outflow=0.21 cfs 0.066 af Pond 3P: Control CB Peak EIev=229.68' Inflow=0.83 cfs 0.269 af Outflow=0.83 cfs 0.269 af Total Runoff Area =0.938 ac Runoff Volume= 0.308 af Average Runoff Depth = 3.94" 15.31% Pervious= 0.144 ac 84.69% Impervious=0.794 ac 0 3050 Predev Type IA 24-hr 100 Year Rainfall=4.50" Prepared by Hopper Dennis Jellison, PLLC Printed 12/3/2009 HydroCAD® 9.00 s/n 00668 ©2009 HydroCAD Software Solutions LLC Page 15 Summary for Subcatchment 1S: South Parking Area Runoff = 0.50 cfs @ 7.88 hrs, Volume= 0.162 af, Depth> 4.03" Runoff by SCS TR-20 method, UH=SCS, Time Span= 1.00-24.00 hrs, dt= 0.05 hrs Type IA 24-hr 100 Year Rainfall=4.50" Area (sf) CN Description 2,477 80 Landscape 18,524 98 Pavement/sidewalk 21,001 96 Weighted Average 2,477 11.79% Pervious Area 18,524 88.21% Impervious Area Tc Length Slope Velocity Capacity Description (min) (feet) (ft/ft) (ft/sec) (cfs) 6.0 Direct Entry, Estimated Tc Summary for Subcatchment 2S: North Parking Area Runoff = 0.21 cfs @ 7.88 hrs, Volume= 0.066 af, Depth> 3.92" Runoff by SCS TR-20 method, UH=SCS, Time Span= 1.00-24.00 hrs, dt= 0.05 hrs Type IA 24-hr 100 Year Rainfall=4.50" Area (sf) CN Description 1,269 80 Landscaping 7,526 98 Pavement and Sidewalk 8,795 95 Weighted Average 1,269 14.43% Pervious Area 7,526 85.57% Impervious Area Tc Length Slope Velocity Capacity Description (min) (feet) (ft/ft) (ft/sec) (cfs) 6.0 Direct Entry, Estimated Tc Summary for Subcatchment 3S: Roof Runoff = 0.13 cfs @ 7.87 hrs, Volume= 0.041 af, Depth> 4.25" Runoff by SCS TR-20 method, UH=SCS, Time Span= 1.00-24.00 hrs, dt= 0.05 hrs Type IA 24-hr 100 Year Rainfall=4.50" Area (sf) CN Description 5,087 98 Roof 5,087 100.00% Impervious Area 4 3050 Predev Type IA 24-hr 100 Year Rainfall=4.50" Prepared by Hopper Dennis Jellison, PLLC Printed 12/3/2009 ir HydroCAD®9.00 s/n 00668 ©2009 HydroCAD Software Solutions LLC Page 16 Tc Length Slope Velocity Capacity Description (min) (feet) (ft/ft) (ft/sec) (cfs) 6.0 Direct Entry, Estimated Tc Summary for Subcatchment 4S: North Driveway Runoff = 0.12 cfs @ 7.91 hrs, Volume= 0.039 af, Depth> 3.39" Runoff by SCS TR-20 method, UH=SCS, Time Span= 1.00-24.00 hrs, dt= 0.05 hrs Type IA 24-hr 100 Year Rainfall=4.50" Area (sf) CN Description 3,464 98 Pavement/SW 2,511 80 Landscape 5,975 90 Weighted Average 2,511 42.03% Pervious Area 3,464 57.97% Impervious Area Tc Length Slope Velocity Capacity Description (min) (feet) (ft/ft) (ft/sec) (cfs) 6.0 Direct Entry, Estimated Tc Summary for Reach 1R: 3" Roof Drain Inflow Area = 0.117 ac,100.00% Impervious, Inflow Depth > 4.25" for 100 Year event Inflow = 0.13 cfs @ 7.87 hrs, Volume= 0.041 af Outflow = 0.13 cfs @ 7.90 hrs, Volume= 0.041 af, Atten= 0%, Lag= 1.8 min Routing by Stor-Ind+Trans method, Time Span= 1.00-24.00 hrs, dt= 0.05 hrs Max. Velocity= 2.90 fps, Min. Travel Time= 0.9 min Avg. Velocity = 1.84 fps, Avg. Travel Time= 1.4 min Peak Storage= 6 cf @ 7.89 hrs, Average Depth at Peak Storage= 0.21' Bank-Full Depth= 0.25', Capacity at Bank-Full= 0.12 cfs 3.0" Round Pipe n= 0.013 Length= 150.0' Slope= 0.0200 '/' Inlet Invert= 232.50', Outlet Invert= 229.50' • 3050 Predev Type IA 24-hr 100 Year Rainfall=4.50" Prepared by Hopper Dennis Jellison, PLLC Printed 12/3/2009 HydroCAD® 9.00 s/n 00668 ©2009 HydroCAD Software Solutions LLC Page 17 Summary for Pond 1P: Parking Lot Storage Inflow Area = 0.599 ac, 90.51% Impervious, Inflow Depth > 4.07" for 100 Year event Inflow = 0.63 cfs @ 7.88 hrs, Volume= 0.203 af Outflow = 0.63 cfs @ 7.88 hrs, Volume= 0.203 af, Atten= 0%, Lag= 0.0 min Primary = 0.63 cfs @ 7.88 hrs, Volume= 0.203 af Routing by Stor-Ind method, Time Span= 1.00-24.00 hrs, dt= 0.05 hrs Peak Elev= 231.08' © 7.88 hrs Surf.Area= 85 sf Storage= 3 cf Plug-Flow detention time= 0.1 min calculated for 0.203 af (100% of inflow) Center-of-Mass det. time= 0.1 min ( 672.5 - 672.5 ) Volume Invert Avail.Storage Storage Description #1 231.00' 3,178 cf Custom Stage Data (Prismatic) Listed below (Recalc) Elevation Surf.Area Inc.Store Cum.Store (feet) (sq-ft) (cubic-feet) (cubic-feet) 231.00 5 0 0 232.00 1,050 528 528 233.00 4,250 2,650 3,178 Device Routing Invert Outlet Devices ) #1 Primary 229.20' 6.0" Round Culvert L= 28.0' Ke= 0.500 Outlet Invert= 228.90' S= 0.0107 '/' Cc= 0.900 n= 0.013 #2 Device 1 231.00' 2.4" x 24.0" Horiz. Orifice/Grate X 10.00 C= 0.600 in 24.0" x 30.0" Grate Limited to weir flow at low heads Primary OutFlow Max=0.63 cfs @ 7.88 hrs HW=231.08' (Free Discharge) L1=Culvert (Passes 0.63 cfs of 1.06 cfs potential flow) L2=Orifice/Grate (Weir Controls 0.63 cfs @ 0.91 fps) Summary for Pond 2P: Parking Lot Storage Inflow Area = 0.202 ac, 85.57% Impervious, Inflow Depth > 3.92" for 100 Year event Inflow = 0.21 cfs @ 7.88 hrs, Volume= 0.066 af Outflow = 0.21 cfs @ 7.88 hrs, Volume= 0.066 af, Atten= 0%, Lag= 0.0 min Primary = 0.21 cfs @ 7.88 hrs, Volume= 0.066 af Routing by Stor-Ind method, Time Span= 1.00-24.00 hrs, dt= 0.05 hrs Peak Elev= 231.04' @ 7.88 hrs Surf.Area= 12 sf Storage= 0 cf Plug-Flow detention time= 0.0 min calculated for 0.066 af (100% of inflow) Center-of-Mass det. time= 0.0 min ( 684.9 - 684.9 ) Volume Invert Avail.Storage Storage Description #1 231.00' 31 cf Custom Stage Data (Prismatic) Listed below (Recalc) 4 3050 Predev Type IA 24-hr 100 Year Rainfall=4.50" Prepared by Hopper Dennis Jellison, PLLC Printed 12/3/2009 IF 1 HydroCAD® 9.00 s/n 00668 ©2009 HydroCAD Software Solutions LLC Page 18 Elevation Surf.Area Inc.Store Cum.Store (feet) (sq-ft) (cubic-feet) (cubic-feet) 231.00 4 0 0 231.50 120 31 31 Device Routing Invert Outlet Devices #1 Primary 229.50' 4.0" Round Culvert L= 78.0' Ke= 0.500 Outlet Invert= 228.90' S= 0.0077 '/' Cc= 0.900 n= 0.013 Cast iron, coated #2 Device 1 231.00' 2.4" x 24.0" Horiz. Orifice/Grate X 10.00 C= 0.600 in 24.0" x 30.0" Grate Limited to weir flow at low heads Primary OutFlow Max=0.21 cfs © 7.88 hrs HW=231.04' (Free Discharge) L1=Culvert (Passes 0.21 cfs of 0.27 cfs potential flow) L2=Orifice/Grate (Weir Controls 0.21 cfs @ 0.63 fps) Summary for Pond 3P: Control CB Inflow Area = 0.801 ac, 89.26% Impervious, Inflow Depth > 4.03" for 100 Year event Inflow = 0.83 cfs @ 7.88 hrs, Volume= 0.269 of Outflow = 0.83 cfs @ 7.88 hrs, Volume= 0.269 af, Atten= 0%, Lag= 0.0 min Primary = 0.83 cfs © 7.88 hrs, Volume= 0.269 af Routing by Stor-Ind method, Time Span= 1.00-24.00 hrs, dt= 0.05 hrs I Peak Elev= 229.68' © 7.88 hrs Device Routing Invert Outlet Devices #1 Primary 229.10' 8.0" Round Culvert L= 8.0' Ke= 0.500 Inlet Invert= 228.80' S= -0.0375 '/' Cc= 0.900 n= 0.013 Corrugated PE, smooth interior #2 Device 1 228.80' 30.0" W x 6.0" H Vert. Orifice/Grate C= 0.600 #3 Device 1 229.72' 3.0" Vert. Orifice/Grate C= 0.600 #4 Device 1 233.66' 2.5' long Sharp-Crested Rectangular Weir 2 End Contraction(s) Primary OutFlow Max=0.83 cfs @ 7.88 hrs HW=229.68' (Free Discharge) L1=Culvert (Inlet Controls 0.83 cfs @ 2.59 fps) 2=Orifice/Grate (Passes 0.83 cfs of 4.41 cfs potential flow) 'r 3=Orifice/Grate ( Controls 0.00 cfs) 4=Sharp-Crested Rectangular Weir ( Controls 0.00 cfs) 0 • oof 1 R N h Parking Area 4" Roof Dr.'n /2ND 1 P Parking *Storage Parking Lot Storage 2R South Parking Area 8" ipe (4s) North Driveway A3P 3 Control CB 110 mo S Reach 'on. Drainage Diagram for 3050 Proposed Prepared by Hopper Dennis Jellison, PLLC, Printed 12/3/2009 HydroCAD®9.00 s/n 00668 ©2009 HydroCAD Software Solutions LLC 3050 Proposed Prepared by Hopper Dennis Jellison, PLLC Printed 12/3/2009 ll 6 HydroCAD®9.00 s/n 00668 ©2009 HydroCAD Software Solutions LLC Page 2 Area Listing (all nodes) Area CN Description (acres) (subcatchment-numbers) 0.132 80 Landscape (1S, 4S) 0.006 80 Landscaping (2S) 0.175 98 Pavement and Sidewalk (2S) 0.115 98 Pavement/SW (4S) 0.279 98 Pavement/sidewalk (1S) 0.156 98 Roof (3S) 0.861 TOTAL AREA 0 3050 Proposed Type IA 24-hr 10 Year Rainfall=3.40" Prepared by Hopper Dennis Jellison, PLLC Printed 12/3/2009 HydroCAD®9.00 s/n 00668 ©2009 HydroCAD Software Solutions LLC Page 3 Time span=0.00-24.00 hrs, dt=0.05 hrs, 481 points Runoff by SCS TR-20 method, UH=SCS Reach routing by Stor-Ind+Trans method - Pond routing by Stor-Ind method Subcatchment 1S: South Parking Area Runoff Area=14.152 sf 85.73% Impervious Runoff Depth>2.84" Tc=6.0 min CN=95 Runoff=0.24 cfs 0.077 af Subcatchment 2S: North Parking Area Runoff Area=7,865 sf 96.83% Impervious Runoff Depth>3.05" Tc=6.0 min CN=97 Runoff=0.14 cfs 0.046 of Subcatchment 3S: Roof Runoff Area=6,786 sf 100.00% Impervious Runoff Depth>3.16" Tc=6.0 min CN=98 Runoff=0.13 cfs 0.041 af Subcatchment 4S: North Driveway Runoff Area=8,713 sf 57.41% Impervious Runoff Depth>2.35" Tc=6.0 min CN=90 Runoff=0.12 cfs 0.039 af Reach 1R: 4" Roof Drain Avg. Depth=0.16' Max Vet=3.03 fps Inflow=0.13 cfs 0.041 af 4.0" Round Pipe n=0.013 L=150.0' S=0.0200 'I' Capacity=0.27 cfs Outflow=0.13 cfs 0.041 af Reach 2R: 8" Pipe Avg. Depth=0.31' Max Vel=2.13 fps Inflow=0.34 cfs 0.123 af 8.0" Round Pipe n=0.013 L=32.0' S=0.0041 '/' Capacity=0.77 cfs Outflow=0.34 cfs 0.123 af Pond 1P: Parking Lot Storage Peak Elev=233.34' Storage=l cf Inflow=0.24 cfs 0.077 af Outflow=0.24 cfs 0.077 af ' Pond 2P: Parking Lot Storage Peak EIev=233.77' Storage=82 cf Inflow=0.14 cfs 0.046 af Outflow=0.10 cfs 0.046 af Pond 3P: Control CB Peak EIev=229.50' Inflow=0.46 cfs 0.164 af Outflow=0.46 cfs 0.164 af Total Runoff Area = 0.861 ac Runoff Volume= 0.203 af Average Runoff Depth = 2.83" 15.94% Pervious = 0.137 ac 84.06% Impervious = 0.724 ac 3050 Proposed Type IA 24-hr 10 Year Rainfall=3.40" Prepared by Hopper Dennis Jellison, PLLC Printed 12/3/2009 ib HydroCAD®9.00 s/n 00668 ©2009 HydroCAD Software Solutions LLC Page 4 Summary for Subcatchment 1S: South Parking Area Runoff = 0.24 cfs @ 7.89 hrs, Volume= 0.077 af, Depth> 2.84" Runoff by SCS TR-20 method, UH=SCS, Time Span= 0.00-24.00 hrs, dt= 0.05 hrs Type IA 24-hr 10 Year Rainfall=3.40" Area (sf) CN Description * 2,020 80 Landscape * 12,132 98 Pavement/sidewalk 14,152 95 Weighted Average 2,020 14.27% Pervious Area 12,132 85.73% Impervious Area Tc Length Slope Velocity Capacity Description (min) (feet) (ft/ft) (ft/sec) (cfs) 6.0 Direct Entry, Estimated Tc Summary for Subcatchment 2S: North Parking Area Runoff = 0.14 cfs @ 7.88 hrs, Volume= 0.046 af, Depth> 3.05" Runoff by SCS TR-20 method, UH=SCS, Time Span= 0.00-24.00 hrs, dt= 0.05 hrs I Type IA 24-hr 10 Year Rainfall=3.40" Area (sf) CN Description * 249 80 Landscaping * 7,616 98 Pavement and Sidewalk 7,865 97 Weighted Average 249 3.17% Pervious Area 7,616 96.83% Impervious Area Tc Length Slope Velocity Capacity Description (min) (feet) (ft/ft) (ft/sec) (cfs) 6.0 Direct Entry, Estimated Tc Summary for Subcatchment 3S: Roof Runoff = 0.13 cfs @ 7.87 hrs, Volume= 0.041 af, Depth> 3.16" Runoff by SCS TR-20 method, UH=SCS, Time Span= 0.00-24.00 hrs, dt= 0.05 hrs Type IA 24-hr 10 Year Rainfall=3.40" Area (sf) CN Description * 6,786 98 Roof 6,786 100.00% Impervious Area 0 3050 Proposed Type IA 24-hr 10 Year Rainfall=3.40" Prepared by Hopper Dennis Jellison, PLLC Printed 12/3/2009 HydroCAD® 9.00 s/n 00668 ©2009 HydroCAD Software Solutions LLC Page 5 Tc Length Slope Velocity Capacity Description (min) (feet) (ft/ft) (ft/sec) (cfs) 6.0 Direct Entry, Estimated Tc Summary for Subcatchment 4S: North Driveway Runoff = 0.12 cfs @ 7.92 hrs, Volume= 0.039 af, Depth> 2.35" Runoff by SCS TR-20 method, UH=SCS, Time Span= 0.00-24.00 hrs, dt= 0.05 hrs Type IA 24-hr 10 Year Rainfall=3.40" Area (sf) CN Description 5,002 98 Pavement/SW 3,711 80 Landscape 8,713 90 Weighted Average 3,711 42.59% Pervious Area 5,002 57.41% Impervious Area Tc Length Slope Velocity Capacity Description (min) (feet) (ft/ft) (ft/sec) (cfs) 6.0 Direct Entry, Estimated Tc Summary for Reach 1R: 4" Roof Drain Inflow Area = 0.156 ac,100.00% Impervious, Inflow Depth > 3.16" for 10 Year event Inflow = 0.13 cfs @ 7.87 hrs, Volume= 0.041 af Outflow = 0.13 cfs @ 7.90 hrs, Volume= 0.041 af, Atten= 0%, Lag= 1.5 min Routing by Stor-Ind+Trans method, Time Span= 0.00-24.00 hrs, dt= 0.05 hrs Max. Velocity= 3.03 fps, Min. Travel Time= 0.8 min Avg. Velocity = 1.76 fps, Avg. Travel Time= 1.4 min Peak Storage= 6 cf @ 7.88 hrs, Average Depth at Peak Storage= 0.16' Bank-Full Depth= 0.33', Capacity at Bank-Full= 0.27 cfs 4.0" Round Pipe n= 0.013 Length= 150.0' Slope= 0.0200 '/' Inlet Invert= 232.50', Outlet Invert= 229.50' 0 4 3050 Proposed Type IA 24-hr 10 Year Rainfall=3.40" Prepared by Hopper Dennis Jellison, PLLC Printed 12/3/2009 IF HydroCAD®9.00 s/n 00668 ©2009 HydroCAD Software Solutions LLC Page 6 Summary for Reach 2R: 8" Pipe Inflow Area = 0.505 ac, 89.69% Impervious, Inflow Depth > 2.91" for 10 Year event Inflow = 0.34 cfs @ 7.94 hrs, Volume= 0.123 of Outflow = 0.34 cfs @ 7.94 hrs, Volume= 0.123 af, Atten= 0%, Lag= 0.4 min Routing by Stor-Ind+Trans method, Time Span= 0.00-24.00 hrs, dt= 0.05 hrs Max. Velocity= 2.13 fps, Min. Travel Time= 0.2 min Avg. Velocity= 1.27 fps, Avg. Travel Time= 0.4 min Peak Storage= 5 cf @ 7.94 hrs, Average Depth at Peak Storage= 0.31' Bank-Full Depth= 0.67', Capacity at Bank-Full= 0.77 cfs 8.0" Round Pipe n= 0.013 Corrugated PE, smooth interior Length= 32.0' Slope= 0.0041 '/' Inlet Invert= 229.03', Outlet Invert= 228.90' 0 Summary for Pond 1P: Parking Lot Storage Inflow Area = 0.325 ac, 85.73% Impervious, Inflow Depth > 2.84" for 10 Year event Inflow = 0.24 cfs @ 7.89 hrs, Volume= 0.077 af Outflow = 0.24 cfs @ 7.89 hrs, Volume= 0.077 af, Atten= 0%, Lag= 0.0 min Primary = 0.24 cfs @ 7.89 hrs, Volume= 0.077 af Routing by Stor-Ind method, Time Span= 0.00-24.00 hrs, dt= 0.05 hrs Peak Elev= 233.34' @ 7.89 hrs Surf.Area= 21 sf Storage= 1 cf Plug-Flow detention time= 0.0 min calculated for 0.077 af (100% of inflow) Center-of-Mass det. time= 0.0 min ( 697.4 - 697.4 ) Volume Invert Avail.Storage Storage Description #1 233.30' 280 cf Custom Stage Data (Prismatic) Listed below (Recalc) Elevation Surf.Area Inc.Store Cum.Store (feet) (sq-ft) (cubic-feet) (cubic-feet) 233.30 5 0 0 233.50 84 9 9 234.00 1,000 271 280 Device Routing Invert Outlet Devices #1 Primary 231.65' 8.0" Round Culvert L= 79.0' Ke= 0.500 • Outlet Invert= 231.33' S= 0.0041 '/' Cc= 0.900 n= 0.013 Corrugated PE, smooth interior #2 Device 1 233.30' 2.4"x 24.0" Horiz. Orifice/Grate X 10.00 3050 Proposed Type IA 24-hr 10 Year Rainfall=3.40" Prepared by Hopper Dennis Jellison, PLLC Printed 12/3/2009 HydroCAD®9.00 s/n 00668 ©2009 HydroCAD Software Solutions LLC Page 7 C= 0.600 in 24.0" x 30.0" Grate Limited to weir flow at low heads Primary OutFlow Max=0.24 cfs @ 7.89 hrs HW=233.34' (Free Discharge) L1=Culvert (Passes 0.24 cfs of 1.35 cfs potential flow) L2=Orifice/Grate (Weir Controls 0.24 cfs @ 0.66 fps) Summary for Pond 2P: Parking Lot Storage Inflow Area = 0.181 ac, 96.83% Impervious, Inflow Depth > 3.05" for 10 Year event Inflow = 0.14 cfs @ 7.88 hrs, Volume= 0.046 of Outflow = 0.10 cfs @ 8.11 hrs, Volume= 0.046 af, Atten= 28%, Lag= 14.0 min Primary = 0.10 cfs @ 8.11 hrs, Volume= 0.046 of Routing by Stor-Ind method, Time Span= 0.00-24.00 hrs, dt= 0.05 hrs Peak Elev= 233.77' @ 8.11 hrs Surf.Area= 560 sf Storage= 82 cf Plug-Flow detention time= 2.1 min calculated for 0.046 af (100% of inflow) Center-of-Mass det. time= 2.0 min ( 677.4 - 675.4 ) Volume Invert Avail.Storage Storage Description #1 233.40' 259 cf Custom Stage Data (Prismatic) Listed below (Recalc) ' Elevation Surf.Area Inc.Store Cum.Store (feet) (sq-ft) (cubic-feet) (cubic-feet) 233.40 5 0 0 233.50 30 2 2 234.00 1,000 258 259 Device Routing Invert Outlet Devices #1 Primary 233.40' 2.0" x 2.5" Horiz. Orifice/Grate C= 0.600 Limited to weir flow at low heads Primary OutFlow Max=0.10 cfs @ 8.11 hrs HW=233.77' (Free Discharge) L1=Orifice/Grate (Orifice Controls 0.10 cfs @ 2.94 fps) Summary for Pond 3P: Control CB Inflow Area = 0.661 ac, 92.12% Impervious, Inflow Depth > 2.97" for 10 Year event Inflow = 0.46 cfs @ 7.93 hrs, Volume= 0.164 of Outflow = 0.46 cfs @ 7.93 hrs, Volume= 0.164 af, Atten= 0%, Lag= 0.0 min Primary = 0.46 cfs @ 7.93 hrs, Volume= 0.164 af Routing by Stor-Ind method, Time Span= 0.00-24.00 hrs, dt= 0.05 hrs Peak Elev= 229.50' @ 7.93 hrs Device Routing Invert Outlet Devices #1 Primary 229.10' 8.0" Round Culvert L= 8.0' Ke= 0.500 Inlet Invert= 228.80' S= -0.0375 '/' Cc= 0.900 n= 0.013 Corrugated PE, smooth interior #2 Device 1 228.80' 30.0" W x 6.0" H Vert. Orifice/Grate C= 0.600 #3 Device 1 229.72' 3.0" Vert. Orifice/Grate C= 0.600 3050 Proposed Type IA 24-hr 10 Year Rainfall=3.40" Prepared by Hopper Dennis Jellison, PLLC Printed 12/3/2009 ii, HydroCAD®9.00 s/n 00668 ©2009 HydroCAD Software Solutions LLC Page 8 #4 Device 1 233.66' 2.5' long Sharp-Crested Rectangular Weir 2 End Contraction(s) Primary OutFlow Max=0.46 cfs @ 7.93 hrs HW=229.50' (Free Discharge) t =Culvert (Inlet Controls 0.46 cfs @ 2.14 fps) 2=Orifice/Grate (Passes 0.46 cfs of 3.57 cfs potential flow) 3=Orifice/Grate ( Controls 0.00 cfs) =Sharp-Crested Rectangular Weir ( Controls 0.00 cfs) I 1 0 3050 Proposed Type IA 24-hr 25 Year Rainfall=3.70" Prepared by Hopper Dennis Jellison, PLLC Printed 12/3/2009 HydroCAD® 9.00 s/n 00668 ©2009 HydroCAD Software Solutions LLC Page 9 Time span=0.00-24.00 hrs, dt=0.05 hrs, 481 points Runoff by SCS TR-20 method, UH=SCS Reach routing by Stor-Ind+Trans method - Pond routing by Stor-Ind method Subcatchment 1S: South Parking Area Runoff Area=14.152 sf 85.73% Impervious Runoff Depth>3.13" Tc=6.0 min CN=95 Runoff=0.27 cfs 0.085 af Subcatchment 2S: North Parking Area Runoff Area=7,865 sf 96.83% Impervious Runoff Depth>3.35" Tc=6.0 min CN=97 Runoff=0.16 cfs 0.050 af Subcatchment 3S: Roof Runoff Area=6,786 sf 100.00% Impervious Runoff Depth>3.46" Tc=6.0 min CN=98 Runoff=0.14 cfs 0.045 af Subcatchment 4S: North Driveway Runoff Area=8,713 sf 57.41% Impervious Runoff Depth>2.63" Tc=6.0 min CN=90 Runoff=0.14 cfs 0.044 of Reach 1R: 4" Roof Drain Avg. Depth=0.17' Max Vet=3.10 fps Inflow=0.14 cfs 0.045 af 4.0" Round Pipe n=0.013 L=150.0' S=0.0200 '/' Capacity=0.27 cfs Outflow=0.14 cfs 0.045 af Reach 2R: 8" Pipe Avg. Depth=0.32' Max Vet=2.18 fps Inflow=0.37 cfs 0.135 af 8.0" Round Pipe n=0.013 L=32.0' S=0.0041 '/' Capacity=0.77 cfs Outflow=0.37 cfs 0.135 af Pond 1P: Parking Lot Storage Peak Elev=233.34' Storage=l cf Inflow=0.27 cfs 0.085 af Outflow=0.27 cfs 0.085 af Pond 2P: Parking Lot Storage Peak EIev=233.80' Storage=101 cf Inflow=0.16 cfs 0.050 af Outflow=0.11 cfs 0.050 af Pond 3P: Control CB Peak EIev=229.52' Inflow=0.50 cfs 0.180 af Outflow=0.50 cfs 0.180 af Total Runoff Area = 0.861 ac Runoff Volume = 0.224 af Average Runoff Depth = 3.12" 15.94% Pervious = 0.137 ac 84.06% Impervious = 0.724 ac 3050 Proposed Type IA 24-hr 25 Year Rainfall=3.70" Prepared by Hopper Dennis Jellison, PLLC Printed 12/3/2009 46 HydroCAD®9.00 s/n 00668 ©2009 HydroCAD Software Solutions LLC Page 10 Summary for Subcatchment 1S: South Parking Area Runoff = 0.27 cfs @ 7.89 hrs, Volume= 0.085 af, Depth> 3.13" Runoff by SCS TR-20 method, UH=SCS, Time Span= 0.00-24.00 hrs, dt= 0.05 hrs Type IA 24-hr 25 Year Rainfall=3.70" Area (sf) CN Description 2,020 80 Landscape 12,132 98 Pavement/sidewalk 14,152 95 Weighted Average 2,020 14.27% Pervious Area 12,132 85.73% Impervious Area Tc Length Slope Velocity Capacity Description (min) (feet) (ft/ft) (ft/sec) (cfs) 6.0 Direct Entry, Estimated Tc Summary for Subcatchment 2S: North Parking Area Runoff = 0.16 cfs @ 7.88 hrs, Volume= 0.050 af, Depth> 3.35" Runoff by SCS TR-20 method, UH=SCS, Time Span= 0.00-24.00 hrs, dt= 0.05 hrs Type IA 24-hr 25 Year Rainfall=3.70" Area (sf) CN Description 249 80 Landscaping 7,616 98 Pavement and Sidewalk 7,865 97 Weighted Average 249 3.17% Pervious Area 7,616 96.83% Impervious Area Tc Length Slope Velocity Capacity Description (min) (feet) (ft/ft) (ft/sec) (cfs) 6.0 Direct Entry, Estimated Tc Summary for Subcatchment 3S: Roof Runoff = 0.14 cfs @ 7.87 hrs, Volume= 0.045 af, Depth> 3.46" Runoff by SCS TR-20 method, UH=SCS, Time Span= 0.00-24.00 hrs, dt= 0.05 hrs Type IA 24-hr 25 Year Rainfall=3.70" Area (sf) CN Description 6,786 98 Roof 6,786 100.00% Impervious Area 3050 Proposed Type IA 24-hr 25 Year Rainfall=3.70" Prepared by Hopper Dennis Jellison, PLLC Printed 12/3/2009 HydroCAD®9.00 s/n 00668 ©2009 HydroCAD Software Solutions LLC Page 11 Tc Length Slope Velocity Capacity Description (min) (feet) (ft/ft) (ft/sec) (cfs) 6.0 Direct Entry, Estimated Tc Summary for Subcatchment 4S: North Driveway Runoff = 0.14 cfs @ 7.92 hrs, Volume= 0.044 af, Depth> 2.63" Runoff by SCS TR-20 method, UH=SCS, Time Span= 0.00-24.00 hrs, dt= 0.05 hrs Type IA 24-hr 25 Year Rainfall=3.70" Area (sf) CN Description 5,002 98 Pavement/SW 3,711 80 Landscape 8,713 90 Weighted Average 3,711 42.59% Pervious Area 5,002 57.41% Impervious Area Tc Length Slope Velocity Capacity Description (min) (feet) (ft/ft) (ft/sec) (cfs) 6.0 Direct Entry, Estimated Tc Summary for Reach 1R: 4" Roof Drain Inflow Area = 0.156 ac,100.00% Impervious, Inflow Depth > 3.46" for 25 Year event Inflow = 0.14 cfs @ 7.87 hrs, Volume= 0.045 af Outflow = 0.14 cfs @ 7.90 hrs, Volume= 0.045 af, Atten= 0%, Lag= 1.4 min Routing by Stor-Ind+Trans method, Time Span= 0.00-24.00 hrs, dt= 0.05 hrs Max. Velocity= 3.10 fps, Min. Travel Time= 0.8 min Avg. Velocity = 1.81 fps, Avg. Travel Time= 1.4 min Peak Storage= 7 cf @ 7.88 hrs, Average Depth at Peak Storage= 0.17' Bank-Full Depth= 0.33', Capacity at Bank-Full= 0.27 cfs 4.0" Round Pipe n= 0.013 Length= 150.0' Slope= 0.0200 '1 Inlet Invert= 232.50', Outlet Invert= 229.50' 3050 Proposed Type IA 24-hr 25 Year Rainfall=3.70" Prepared by Hopper Dennis Jellison, PLLC Printed 12/3/2009 HydroCAD®9.00 s/n 00668 ©2009 HydroCAD Software Solutions LLC Page 12 Summary for Reach 2R: 8" Pipe Inflow Area = 0.505 ac, 89.69% Impervious, Inflow Depth > 3.21" for 25 Year event Inflow = 0.37 cfs @ 7.93 hrs, Volume= 0.135 af Outflow = 0.37 cfs @ 7.94 hrs, Volume= 0.135 af, Atten= 0%, Lag= 0.4 min Routing by Stor-Ind+Trans method, Time Span= 0.00-24.00 hrs, dt= 0.05 hrs Max. Velocity= 2.18 fps, Min. Travel Time= 0.2 min Avg. Velocity = 1.31 fps, Avg. Travel Time= 0.4 min Peak Storage= 5 cf @ 7.94 hrs, Average Depth at Peak Storage= 0.32' Bank-Full Depth= 0.67', Capacity at Bank-Full= 0.77 cfs 8.0" Round Pipe n= 0.013 Corrugated PE, smooth interior Length= 32.0' Slope= 0.0041 'I' Inlet Invert= 229.03', Outlet Invert= 228.90' 0 Summary for Pond 1P: Parking Lot Storage Inflow Area = 0.325 ac, 85.73% Impervious, Inflow Depth > 3.13" for 25 Year event Inflow = 0.27 cfs @ 7.89 hrs, Volume= 0.085 af Outflow = 0.27 cfs @ 7.88 hrs, Volume= 0.085 af, Atten= 0%, Lag= 0.0 min Primary = 0.27 cfs @ 7.88 hrs, Volume= 0.085 af Routing by Stor-Ind method, Time Span= 0.00-24.00 hrs, dt= 0.05 hrs Peak Elev= 233.34' @ 7.88 hrs Surf.Area= 22 sf Storage= 1 cf Plug-Flow detention time= 0.0 min calculated for 0.085 af(100% of inflow) Center-of-Mass det. time= 0.0 min (693.4 - 693.4 ) Volume Invert Avail.Storage Storage Description #1 233.30' 280 cf Custom Stage Data (Prismatic) Listed below (Recalc) Elevation Surf.Area Inc.Store Cum.Store (feet) (sq-ft) (cubic-feet) (cubic-feet) 233.30 5 0 0 233.50 84 9 9 234.00 1,000 271 280 Device Routing Invert Outlet Devices #1 Primary 231.65' 8.0" Round Culvert L= 79.0' Ke= 0.500 • Outlet Invert= 231.33' S= 0.0041 '/' Cc= 0.900 n= 0.013 Corrugated PE, smooth interior #2 Device 1 233.30' 2.4" x 24.0" Horiz. Orifice/Grate X 10.00 3050 Proposed Type IA 24-hr 25 Year Rainfall=3.70" Prepared by Hopper Dennis Jellison, PLLC Printed 12/3/2009 HydroCAD®9.00 s/n 00668 ©2009 HydroCAD Software Solutions LLC Pape 13 C= 0.600 in 24.0" x 30.0" Grate Limited to weir flow at low heads Primary OutFlow Max=0.27 cfs @ 7.88 hrs HW=233.34' (Free Discharge) 'L1=Culvert (Passes 0.27 cfs of 1.35 cfs potential flow) 2=Orifice/Grate (Weir Controls 0.27 cfs @ 0.68 fps) Summary for Pond 2P: Parking Lot Storage Inflow Area = 0.181 ac, 96.83% Impervious, Inflow Depth > 3.35" for 25 Year event Inflow = 0.16 cfs @ 7.88 hrs, Volume= 0.050 af Outflow = 0.11 cfs @ 8.12 hrs, Volume= 0.050 af, Atten= 32%, Lag= 14.8 min Primary = 0.11 cfs @ 8.12 hrs, Volume= 0.050 af Routing by Stor-Ind method, Time Span= 0.00-24.00 hrs, dt= 0.05 hrs Peak Elev= 233.80' @ 8.12 hrs Surf.Area= 621 sf Storage= 101 cf Plug-Flow detention time= 2.5 min calculated for 0.050 af(100% of inflow) Center-of-Mass det. time= 2.4 min ( 675.0 - 672.6 ) Volume Invert Avail.Storage Storage Description #1 233.40' 259 cf Custom Stage Data(Prismatic) Listed below (Recalc) ik Elevation Surf.Area Inc.Store Cum.Store (feet) (sq-ft) (cubic-feet) (cubic-feet) 233.40 5 0 0 233.50 30 2 2 234.00 1,000 258 259 Device Routing Invert Outlet Devices #1 Primary 233.40' 2.0" x 2.5" Horiz. Orifice/Grate C= 0.600 Limited to weir flow at low heads Primary OutFlow Max=0.11 cfs @ 8.12 hrs HW=233.80' (Free Discharge) t1=Orifice/Grate (Orifice Controls 0.11 cfs @ 3.06 fps) Summary for Pond 3P: Control CB Inflow Area = 0.661 ac, 92.12% Impervious, Inflow Depth > 3.27" for 25 Year event Inflow = 0.50 cfs @ 7.93 hrs, Volume= 0.180 of Outflow = 0.50 cfs © 7.93 hrs, Volume= 0.180 af, Atten= 0%, Lag= 0.0 min Primary = 0.50 cfs @ 7.93 hrs, Volume= 0.180 af Routing by Stor-Ind method, Time Span= 0.00-24.00 hrs, dt= 0.05 hrs Peak Elev= 229.52' @ 7.93 hrs Device Routing Invert Outlet Devices #1 Primary 229.10' 8.0" Round Culvert L= 8.0' Ke= 0.500 Inlet Invert= 228.80' S= -0.0375 '/ Cc= 0.900 n= 0.013 Corrugated PE, smooth interior #2 Device 1 228.80' 30.0"W x 6.0" H Vert. Orifice/Grate C= 0.600 #3 Device 1 229.72' 3.0"Vert. Orifice/Grate C= 0.600 3050 Proposed Type IA 24-hr 25 Year Rainfall=3.70" Prepared by Hopper Dennis Jellison, PLLC Printed 12/3/2009 ii, HydroCAD®9.00 s/n 00668 ©2009 HydroCAD Software Solutions LLC Paae 14 #4 Device 1 233.66' 2.5' long Sharp-Crested Rectangular Weir 2 End Contraction(s) Primary OutFlow Max=0.50 cfs @ 7.93 hrs HW=229.52' (Free Discharge) L =Culvert (Inlet Controls 0.50 cfs @ 2.19 fps) 2=Orifice/Grate (Passes 0.50 cfs of 3.67 cfs potential flow) 3=Orifice/Grate ( Controls 0.00 cfs) =Sharp-Crested Rectangular Weir ( Controls 0.00 cfs) I 1 1 1 41) 3050 Proposed Type IA 24-hr 100 Year Rainfall=4.50" Prepared by Hopper Dennis Jellison, PLLC Printed 12/3/2009 HydroCAD®9.00 s/n 00668 ©2009 HydroCAD Software Solutions LLC Page 15 Time span=0.00-24.00 hrs, dt=0.05 hrs, 481 points Runoff by SCS TR-20 method, UH=SCS Reach routing by Stor-Ind+Trans method - Pond routing by Stor-Ind method Subcatchment 1S: South Parking Area Runoff Area=14.152 sf 85.73% Impervious Runoff Depth>3.92" Tc=6.0 min CN=95 Runoff=0.33 cfs 0.106 af Subcatchment 2S: North Parking Area Runoff Area=7,865 sf 96.83% Impervious Runoff Depth>4.14" Tc=6.0 min CN=97 Runoff=0.19 cfs 0.062 af Subcatchment 3S: Roof Runoff Area=6,786 sf 100.00% Impervious Runoff Depth>4.26" Tc=6.0 min CN=98 Runoff=0.17 cfs 0.055 af Subcatchment 4S: North Driveway Runoff Area=8,713 sf 57.41% Impervious Runoff Depth>3.39" Tc=6.0 min CN=90 Runoff=0.18 cfs 0.057 af Reach 1R: 4" Roof Drain Avg. Depth=0.19' Max Vet=3.25 fps Inflow=0.17 cfs 0.055 af 4.0" Round Pipe n=0.013 L=150.0' S=0.0200 '/' Capacity=0.27 cfs Outflow=0.17 cfs 0.055 af Reach 2R: 8" Pipe Avg. Depth=0.36' Max Vet=2.28 fps Inflow=0.44 cfs 0.168 af 8.0" Round Pipe n=0.013 L=32.0' S=0.0041 '/' Capacity=0.77 cfs Outflow=0.44 cfs 0.168 af Pond 1P: Parking Lot Storage Peak Elev=233.35' Storage=l cf Inflow=0.33 cfs 0.106 af Outflow=0.33 cfs 0.106 af Pond 2P: Parking Lot Storage Peak Elev=233.88' Storage=156 cf Inflow=0.19 cfs 0.062 af Outflow=0.12 cfs 0.062 af Pond 3P: Control CB Peak Elev=229.57' Inflow=0.61 cfs 0.224 af Outflow=0.61 cfs 0.224 af Total Runoff Area =0.861 ac Runoff Volume=0.280 af Average Runoff Depth = 3.90" 15.94% Pervious =0.137 ac 84.06% Impervious = 0.724 ac 3050 Proposed Type IA 24-hr 100 Year Rainfall=4.50" Prepared by Hopper Dennis Jellison, PLLC Printed 12/3/2009 HydroCADO 9.00 s/n 00668 ©2009 HydroCAD Software Solutions LLC Page 16 Summary for Subcatchment 1S: South Parking Area Runoff = 0.33 cfs @ 7.88 hrs, Volume= 0.106 af, Depth> 3.92" Runoff by SCS TR-20 method, UH=SCS, Time Span= 0.00-24.00 hrs, dt= 0.05 hrs Type IA 24-hr 100 Year Rainfall=4.50" Area (sf) CN Description 2,020 80 Landscape 12,132 98 Pavement/sidewalk 14,152 95 Weighted Average 2,020 14.27% Pervious Area 12,132 85.73% Impervious Area Tc Length Slope Velocity Capacity Description (min) (feet) (ft/ft) (ft/sec) (cfs) 6.0 Direct Entry, Estimated Tc Summary for Subcatchment 2S: North Parking Area Runoff = 0.19 cfs © 7.87 hrs, Volume= 0.062 af, Depth> 4.14" Runoff by SCS TR-20 method, UH=SCS, Time Span= 0.00-24.00 hrs, dt= 0.05 hrs , Type IA 24-hr 100 Year Rainfall=4.50" Area (sf) CN Description 249 80 Landscaping 7,616 98 Pavement and Sidewalk 7,865 97 Weighted Average 249 3.17% Pervious Area 7,616 96.83% Impervious Area Tc Length Slope Velocity Capacity Description (min) (feet) (ft/ft) (ft/sec) (cfs) 6.0 Direct Entry, Estimated Tc Summary for Subcatchment 3S: Roof Runoff = 0.17 cfs @ 7.87 hrs, Volume= 0.055 af, Depth> 4.26" Runoff by SCS TR-20 method, UH=SCS, Time Span= 0.00-24.00 hrs, dt= 0.05 hrs Type IA 24-hr 100 Year Rainfall=4.50" Area (sf) CN Description 6,786 98 Roof 6,786 100.00% Impervious Area • 3050 Proposed Type IA 24-hr 100 Year Rainfall=4.50" Prepared by Hopper Dennis Jellison, PLLC Printed 12/3/2009 aHydroCAD 9.00 s/n 00668 ©2009 HydroCAD Software Solutions LLC Page 17 Tc Length Slope Velocity Capacity Description (min) (feet) (ft/ft) (ft/sec) (cfs) 6.0 Direct Entry, Estimated Tc Summary for Subcatchment 4S: North Driveway Runoff = 0.18 cfs @ 7.91 hrs, Volume= 0.057 af, Depth> 3.39" Runoff by SCS TR-20 method, UH=SCS, Time Span= 0.00-24.00 hrs, dt= 0.05 hrs Type IA 24-hr 100 Year Rainfall=4.50" Area (sf) CN Description * 5,002 98 Pavement/SW * 3,711 80 Landscape 8,713 90 Weighted Average 3,711 42.59% Pervious Area 5,002 57.41% Impervious Area Tc Length Slope Velocity Capacity Description (min) (feet) (ft/ft) (ft/sec) (cfs) 6.0 Direct Entry, Estimated Tc IISummary for Reach 1R: 4" Roof Drain Inflow Area = 0.156 ac,100.00% Impervious, Inflow Depth > 4.26" for 100 Year event Inflow = 0.17 cfs @ 7.87 hrs, Volume= 0.055 of Outflow = 0.17 cfs @ 7.89 hrs, Volume= 0.055 af, Atten= 0%, Lag= 1.4 min Routing by Stor-Ind+Trans method, Time Span= 0.00-24.00 hrs, dt= 0.05 hrs Max. Velocity= 3.25 fps, Min. Travel Time= 0.8 min Avg. Velocity = 1.92 fps, Avg. Travel Time= 1.3 min Peak Storage= 8 cf @ 7.88 hrs, Average Depth at Peak Storage= 0.19' Bank-Full Depth= 0.33', Capacity at Bank-Full= 0.27 cfs 4.0" Round Pipe n= 0.013 Length= 150.0' Slope= 0.0200 '/' Inlet Invert= 232.50', Outlet Invert= 229.50' 0 Ill 3050 Proposed Type IA 24-hr 100 Year Rainfall=4.50" Prepared by Hopper Dennis Jellison, PLLC Printed 12/3/2009 HydroCAD®9.00 s/n 00668 ©2009 HydroCAD Software Solutions LLC Page 18 Summary for Reach 2R: 8" Pipe Inflow Area = 0.505 ac, 89.69% Impervious, Inflow Depth > 4.00" for 100 Year event Inflow = 0.44 cfs @ 7.93 hrs, Volume= 0.168 of Outflow = 0.44 cfs @ 7.93 hrs, Volume= 0.168 af, Atten= 0%, Lag= 0.4 min Routing by Stor-Ind+Trans method, Time Span= 0.00-24.00 hrs, dt= 0.05 hrs Max. Velocity= 2.28 fps, Min. Travel Time= 0.2 min Avg. Velocity = 1.40 fps, Avg. Travel Time= 0.4 min Peak Storage= 6 cf @ 7.93 hrs, Average Depth at Peak Storage= 0.36' Bank-Full Depth= 0.67', Capacity at Bank-Full= 0.77 cfs 8.0" Round Pipe n= 0.013 Corrugated PE, smooth interior Length= 32.0' Slope= 0.0041 'I' Inlet Invert= 229.03', Outlet Invert=228.90' Summary for Pond 1P: Parking Lot Storage Inflow Area = 0.325 ac, 85.73% Impervious, Inflow Depth > 3.92" for 100 Year event Inflow = 0.33 cfs @ 7.88 hrs, Volume= 0.106 of Outflow = 0.33 cfs @ 7.88 hrs, Volume= 0.106 af, Atten= 0%, Lag= 0.0 min Primary = 0.33 cfs @ 7.88 hrs, Volume= 0.106 af Routing by Stor-Ind method, Time Span= 0.00-24.00 hrs, dt= 0.05 hrs Peak Elev= 233.35' @ 7.88 hrs Surf.Area= 25 sf Storage= 1 cf Plug-Flow detention time= 0.0 min calculated for 0.106 of(100% of inflow) Center-of-Mass det. time= 0.0 min (684.9- 684.9 ) Volume Invert Avail.Storage Storage Description #1 233.30' 280 cf Custom Stage Data(Prismatic) Listed below(Recalc) Elevation Surf.Area Inc.Store Cum.Store (feet) (sq-ft) (cubic-feet) (cubic-feet) 233.30 5 0 0 233.50 84 9 9 234.00 1,000 271 280 Device Routing Invert Outlet Devices #1 Primary 231.65' 8.0" Round Culvert L= 79.0' Ke= 0.500 • Outlet Invert= 231.33' S= 0.0041 '/ Cc= 0.900 n= 0.013 Corrugated PE, smooth interior #2 Device 1 233.30' 2.4" x 24.0" Horiz. Orifice/Grate X 10.00 a 3050 Proposed Type IA 24-hr 100 Year Rainfall=4.50" Prepared by Hopper Dennis Jellison, PLLC Printed 12/3/2009 HydroCAD©9.00 s/n 00668 ©2009 HydroCAD Software Solutions LLC Page 19 C= 0.600 in 24.0"x 30.0" Grate Limited to weir flow at low heads Primary OutFlow Max=0.33 cfs @ 7.88 hrs HW=233.35' (Free Discharge) ' Culvert (Passes 0.33 cfs of 1.36 cfs potential flow) 2=Orifice/Grate (Weir Controls 0.33 cfs @ 0.73 fps) Summary for Pond 2P: Parking Lot Storage Inflow Area = 0.181 ac, 96.83% Impervious, Inflow Depth > 4.14" for 100 Year event Inflow = 0.19 cfs @ 7.87 hrs, Volume= 0.062 of Outflow = 0.12 cfs @ 8.17 hrs, Volume= 0.062 af, Atten= 39%, Lag= 17.5 min Primary = 0.12 cfs @ 8.17 hrs, Volume= 0.062 af Routing by Stor-Ind method, Time Span= 0.00-24.00 hrs, dt= 0.05 hrs Peak Elev= 233.88' @ 8.17 hrs Surf.Area=775 sf Storage= 156 cf Plug-Flow detention time= 3.9 min calculated for 0.062 af(100% of inflow) Center-of-Mass det. time= 3.8 min ( 670.3 - 666.5 ) Volume Invert Avail.Storage Storage Description #1 233.40' 259 cf Custom Stage Data (Prismatic) Listed below (Recalc) Elevation Surf.Area Inc.Store Cum.Store (feet) (sq-ft) (cubic-feet) (cubic-feet) 233.40 5 0 0 233.50 30 2 2 234.00 1,000 258 259 Device Routing Invert Outlet Devices #1 Primary 233.40' 2.0"x 2.5" Horiz. Orifice/Grate C= 0.600 Limited to weir flow at low heads Primary OutFlow Max=0.12 cfs @ 8.17 hrs HW=233.88' (Free Discharge) t1=Orifice/Grate (Orifice Controls 0.12 cfs @ 3.35 fps) Summary for Pond 3P: Control CB Inflow Area = 0.661 ac, 92.12% Impervious, Inflow Depth > 4.06" for 100 Year event Inflow = 0.61 cfs @ 7.92 hrs, Volume= 0.224 af Outflow = 0.61 cfs @ 7.92 hrs, Volume= 0.224 af, Atten= 0%, Lag= 0.0 min Primary = 0.61 cfs @ 7.92 hrs, Volume= 0.224 af Routing by Stor-Ind method, Time Span= 0.00-24.00 hrs, dt= 0.05 hrs Peak Elev= 229.57' @ 7.92 hrs Device Routing Invert Outlet Devices #1 Primary 229.10' 8.0" Round Culvert L= 8.0' Ke= 0.500 Inlet Invert= 228.80' S= -0.0375 '/' Cc= 0.900 n= 0.013 Corrugated PE, smooth interior #2 Device 1 228.80' 30.0"W x 6.0" H Vert. Orifice/Grate C= 0.600 #3 Device 1 229.72' 3.0" Vert. Orifice/Grate C= 0.600 3050 Proposed Type IA 24-hr 100 Year Rainfall=4.50" Prepared by Hopper Dennis Jellison, PLLC Printed 12/3/2009 L HydroCAD®9.00 s/n 00668 ©2009 HydroCAD Software Solutions LLC Page 20 #4 Device 1 233.66' 2.5' long Sharp-Crested Rectangular Weir 2 End Contraction(s) Primary OutFlow Max=0.61 cfs @ 7.92 hrs HW=229.57' (Free Discharge) t =Culvert (Inlet Controls 0.61 cfs @ 2.32 fps) 2=Orifice/Grate (Passes 0.61 cfs of 3.92 cfs potential flow) 3=Orifice/Grate ( Controls 0.00 cfs) =Sharp-Crested Rectangular Weir ( Controls 0.00 cfs) I 0 IC. Arborist Report JOSEPH HARRITY TREE SPECIALIST CERTIFIED ARBORIST December 11, 2009 PROVIDING HDJ Design Group, PLLC KNOWLEDGEABLE Andy Nuttrock CARE FOR TREES 300 W. 15th Street Vancouver, WA 98660 IN THE URBAN Re: Tree Evaluation ENVIRONMENT 13405 SW Pacific Hwy Tigard, OR 97223 Dear Andy, I have visited the site located @ 13405 SW Pacific Hwy and evaluated the trees. What follows in this report are my findings and recommendations. There are nine trees growing on the property. Seven of these trees are Norway Maples. The other two trees are Kwansan Flowering Cherries. I would classify all of these trees as being in fair/good condition. Of the eight trees on site only three are large enough in caliper (DBH) to qualify for mitigation purposes. Five of the Norway Maples are under 12"DBH (7", 8", 7", 5" & 4"). One Kwansan Flowering cherry is also undersized at 10" DBH. These undersized trees are listed on the property survey as #-s 3,4,6,7&8. There is one extra tree that is not marked. It stands in between trees #'s 7&8. I note it as #9. The two Norway Maples, (#'s 1&2) located on the west boundary of the property, are larger then 12" DBH and can be saved. These two trees are of the same caliper size, 16"DBH. The Kwansan Flowering Cherry (#5) cannot be kept. This tree has PO Box 12395 18"DBH. PORTLAND, OREGON 9 212 If the above mentioned tree removal and retention is adhered to, then more than (503) 331-0152 FAX 282--6179 50% of existing tree DBH on the property will be kept. This percentage puts the project into the 50% mitigation area. If we take the 18"DBH Kwansan Flowering arborLteleport.com www.harritytrees.com Cherry and divide it in half(50%) then a total of 9" DBH needs to be mitigated. MEMBER ISA&NAA CCB #84426 ?'his ni trees e9ua�9��can be ma If there area BN arherw se lip site if Trees Respectfully, any other questions feel trees can be installed are kept Ily, free to contact led These two Jo;Ph Na Me. Thank You. Certified it WjISA 18 4g Development Plans Included herein: xi. Preliminary Cover Sheet xii. Preliminary Site Development Plan 1. Includes Vicinity Map xiii. Preliminary Existing Conditions Plan I. Includes Site Topography xiv. Preliminary Demolition Plan xv. Preliminary Grading&Erosion Control Plan xvi. Preliminary Street&Storm Drainage Plan xvii. Preliminary Sanitary Sewer& Water Plan xviii. Preliminary landscape Plan I. Includes Tree Preservation/Mitigation Plan xix. Architectural Drawings xx. Preliminary Lighting Plan — I- u i__,A J �I L J I , a__ i .. ,,:„..,, . , 1 I ❑ SW'/4, Section 2,Township 2 South, Range 1 West,W.M. I P. i SITE 33 1;1 i VICINITY MAP a NOT TO SCALE C i Sheet Index 0 C1.0 PRELIMINARY COVER SHEET I Z g SP1.0 PRELIMINARY SITE DEVELOPMENT PLAN C2.0 PRELIMINARY EXISTING CONDITIONS PLAN 1 C3.0 PRELIMINARY DEMOLITION PLAN = C4.0 PRELIMINARY GRADING AND EROSION CONTROL PLAN W 1 C5.0 PRELIMINARY STREET AND STORM DRAINAGE PLAN 0 C6.0 PRELIMINARY SANITARY SEWER AND WATER PLAN L1.0 PRELIMINARY TREE MITIGATION PLAN L2.0 PRELIMINARY LANDSCAPE PLAN• •• \• or N. / • • • • • ....41, • • • • • \ \ \ • • •\ • • • \ \ Scale 1" = 40' \ \ \ \ 40 SO 120 ST • • \ \ _ wl�llcrraW�s �• \ \ S. \ • . �.' • �,\ �� \\ ') \ M ■sen ,......: V \ V •,'. ■ e__.-- \\ ■ Owner AutoZone Z 0 J \ 1 Memphis,S Front TN Street ■ 1 Memphis,TN 38103 \ F S. 1 I W \ c I \ Engineer HDJ Design Group,PLLC \ a 7 I \ I 300 W.15th Street Ce \ _ PROPOSED I \\ I Vancouver,WA 98660 S. • AUTOZONE 'T S.f Contact:Tom Lonergan,P.E. O \�\ S. BUILDING ° BUILDING �+ l } 7 \`I Phone:(360)695-3488 \\\ \ \\ �\ , 1 + i C 2TA o BELL Site Address 13405 SW Pacific Highway F- \` \ \,� \ �. .-d.. °' +---T—ii.. j�. 1111 I I i,. Tigard,OR + \\ \ —.� t ■I x fa co LU I O \ \1 � WU :1 W w \\\\Y..' S' I p 1 4 '\\ p O IS ■ - = O F co re O SW PACIFIC HIGHWAY c 'V 8pu a I- T ri J C iN �; a Q a DESIGNED: DPS DRAWN: DPS CHECKED: TGL SCALE: :1... H.1.-40' N. I. i_..,_ V N/A DEC 2009 3050-00 AOREGON : SHEET , IO. L1, •1111 ISAIANS C 1.0 Q - t_ J ozox I L.— J I ,,.. I I O I 1 1 1 bl 03756 . „„. .... Located In The SW'/a, Sec. 2,T2S, R1 W, W.M. SITE \\ \\ I 1fl /'// \\ /'-' BUILDING ,_/ \\ /�/, Lg \�.' VICINITY MAP Il / 1 % NOT TO SCALE OM — V EXISTING //l , r• ' �.��/ . /C BUILDING �, �,�.n=.____ _ .._...-. :. "-IL i-0_o.q /, ��rf Z / `tTRAS ENCLOSURE I r !—� .+ \� v\ // -•� i ysrlslrEaam - �.. ��•^' i W ns f �' 0 ; EXTG CHAIN PROPERTY LINK FENCE LINE(TYP) - i r SITE INFORMATION: _ !� ❑ ��f$ 1 EXTG FIRE 5' „�..' z • HYDRANT 1 CD -7 N. __V"..E..TP _ H / PROPOSED BUILDING AREA 6,786 SF 20% }. __ _ PROPOSED PARKING AREA 20,653 SF 61% lin ;\ I I i r 95' I I/ PROPOSED SIDEWALK AREA 1,226 SF 4% •-� ' I PROPOSED LANDSCAPE AREA 5,082 SF 15% - ,-s, gyy 7 *7! TOTAL SITE AREA 33,801 SF M 17 26' 16.5' I '� LO REIAG 17.5' II \� TOTAL PARKING 32 SPACES(2 HC SPACES) Bit • 6zs PROPOSED T The parking lot contains 23%landscaped area. LANDSCAPE AUTOZONE BUILDING I s �- O AREA(TT) PROPOSED ~ STANDARDS: REQ. PROPOSED �\ 6,786 Square Feet w Ltd' B Y - n RETAINING WALL !•«' L Min.Lot Width 50 feet 0.84 acres \ C ' I '-_- o, ' r` Min.Lot Width- 50 feet 249' \ EXISTING - 97 1� Front Setback- 0 feet 52' \ \ BUILDING - "-- I 1 I Side Setback- 0 feet 62' \ MINI STORAGE \ / \ /' I —, 1e.5' I 26' I 18 s �I Rear Setback- 0 feet 4' \ ' \ J-2 V 1 s^ry _ I ,, , Maximum Lot Coverage- 85% 85% \ �' / 48 Maximum Building Height- 45 feet 21 feet \ INGRESS/EGRESS \v// sans I r 1? i V 33' I 5' Minimum Landscape- 15% 15% \ ACCESS EASEMENT i.s I I I — BIKE 44{ PROPOSED ,,� \ \: �° -� BIKE RACK �'. '---} m I ' l._ TRASH ENCLOSURE: O to I � 9, ,b'J n( The trash enclosure will be constructed of masonry block matching the EXISTING r L11L1•URE I Ib ' I I $,V''--1 g, (TYP) I 37.75' Lu. building,6-feet in height. BUILDING \ (TYP) t , PROPOSED I SIGN u \ / \ 111 G Iw COMMERCIAL/RETAIL EXTG'PUBLK: - PROPOSED 1B• PROPOSED RETAINING \\ �' STORAGE'SIGN SIDEWALK WALL W/3'SCREEN EASEMENT 40' III I O EASEMENT �. 17 R.O.W. -_ \\ - DEDICATION - - - YI '_ / I y I `�•--__�-— U _I C1 n n 37,76' n i 8 N b PROPOSED RETAINING EXTG STREET 38 75 �, �_' W EL WALL(TYP) cOP 8'° g it r.',...,... ].rte— _........�.. �.:.:..._.._„ ,,. _._WAY yI Y^• «� �� W LLI LL 8 1, o 0 Z w z f,. EXTHYDR NT f W } ii _ ( _ �_: _ _ SW PACIFIC HIGHWAY 4 `_-........_____ C Q w II (PUBLIC-ASPHALT ... - Scale 1" = 20' a cc m II ii I 1 1 t I _ ,• J W F II "� H► a .1 <i I a Q 4'. i 11 _ .__....__:._-.......-............. ............ ......r__ ..z______.z__..-....._:._zza:a... DESIGNED: 11 �-__--- ,. MPA : J t, I DRAWN: r. r I • � NECKED t_� `...$ "•....•. � +-_._ _.- SCALE: H:1•=20' �`°�1=�i COMMERCIAURETAIL ' V:N/A FEB 3,0 SHEET SP1.0 \ \\ ; \\\ \ n E _ f,ix,// // I LLI¢-._� UNK GATE 1"'''.- / .., n I' EXTO SEWER _ \/ /<\ / EXISTING / 7JJ`` - i ' / \ // \\BUILDING /// - J t• --/ '— / 11) o I Scale 1" = 20' EXTGCHMN / 1 (� • \,- d/ ILA 0 F 20 lO o io ,o o LINK FENCE / PROPERTY / ,.g"-1) \{-, „•"O•"”- � •• / ., / % L"n ' 1 I $ i t I ..r ` (rYP) I \ a/ �.�. 't I (� I t EXTG FIRE i �1� Z 8 UNE EXTG TREE 01 / , r _ I EXTO I I I{GRANT 0 y TO REMAIN - __ - .—. .....1. . _ !' J I '/ T ..�.. ---- cc--=._P jr�f=tom—� dIT- LK�a—.�rt_a� m r• --°� W r--- � � •r, I I,�!—EXTG 38.0 STORM E 41,/ I + ) DETE TION PIPE IfGTREE Mr/'' EXTO BUILDING\ I • I ROOF OVERHAND .\I' 77.8 I. I J EXTG ASPHALT I /r f �\;\a TO EKTG BE REMOVED 1.\,4 PARxINGL T I I EXISTING .-__ �� I I Il� \ e I`• s 1 BUILDING I EXTGASPHALT i •' I LI ,. • .1f�'LQ, \\ \\\ TO- EN'2 I �:'.,, ` I : I ROOF OVERHANG 1 A ....//n(I I I I • •, EXTG CONTOUR CID \ I -. 1 ` PARKING LOT \ a .wt •• EXTG BUILDING 710 S NGR£BSIEGRE55 -IL I - - : )CURB \ 4\'p AMF \.„,.1 • r7-a--- -�y�_-="1 fr� I I 88 EXTG T01 / • �/ I I (TYP) ill \ \4$EASEMENT n EXISTING Zt7LJ \ r r ` ,} 4 a� "�: REIJAN ytY •■\ a\ a\\ �i \\ BUILDING i -4 • /■ LANDSCAPE ExTG\ \ r. yy1 AREA(TYP) TO BE . •/ °- •— • >•'_: G • /O •/f I lc' O \\\ \) 4 ' >e . N 1 r I ////��• SIDEWALJ(' TO EREMOVED • ed7.7!! r r\ e ) ' • ---—-\ , ! / • I I I: ECM STORM \� TDSTRUCTURE' Z r / A • / // _f\_�`�1_ (TY� ,fit/ Ora.• '1 ' \\ / // '. • . )1 EXTG IRRIGATION ( I I B / / r �. T♦( 1 / ��\ B ■ \\\'' / I 1 ! , t- .■ ) I. CONTROL QOX r �_ 1 �'\ 1 t/y a G ♦. / ." 4D'ING ESSIE-:. 1 W "1'•; �j I I I -Itl "1 IGN • I / / • EAS= ENT ■ I N IEXTGSTM / `cl �I, -.hi__ i i ,.t_ 11 I. �.tlr1._ \ _/ i • •� .• I _ Q \ CONIROIANNHDLE ' , 1 ■: 1 ' l -:i. ` — "' —•N �r� .. /: �:-. i G/ \\ / r I . .1-. . f-�` - ■�■ 7 •.s■_ •r, I I I r ~ — -----_---- 0 b . 7.7 I y.va.•aaa >w 'N'—•'•c _ .� -:• i O .� - _ _ �. .—._»a -- p .-H .i.r'••4'- - -------- - -__ ..r... . .._.R.. ..— ,r. .t. •..i ... . ...rte---- 3r• . 2 \ 1 `�--.. ..B EXTG WATER I...1 .. \. ......•1 \ \ t E\ \ ' _- .... ..... ::'L�- LSG ERG LAN.,.._,..k \ d O \ I STORAGE SIGN '. E \\� Esc PPEARE ��\ +I"'o=\� jS\t v ••..: \ �� +- \ t,` z �l/♦ LI Iq • '4, Lal I. fT ' EXTGSIGNAL E g s 1` 4'• 0 % OW) \ j.••} E%TOFIRE \�.. \ 0 L p .--I I \ POLE t E L 1 . / t \ \ '..% \ rVDRANT ... �...._.� V O 6 't71: 1 \ \ \ 1i t.--',\ -': .\ r y� ( ••, S1�Y PACIFIC.HIGHWAY \ \ o Z a 1 / / / F t,'-'./ '-'' // ._._ r._..._........._..t / - t— / / / o / I I/ / / 1 i/ / •1*• / / / / / /.■tr / i NJ LL / / 1 _. ...._..../._ / w / -• /r_ / N 0 ii 1.•..4. .cry - ---1„„ -\•-•-,:: Z-v-- A...•-- \.-,.=.�_--1......�----L .=..1........, W _ ...fir-.•_ 1 `.jay,,.... `�••'-_�,y}, �'� ,-1-•-/-' ' Pt-I .�\ F .--a.....2111e..i.ot G ` s I DESIGNED: 1�1 1 ..) I\— r CF — DPS 1 a. DRAWN: • DPS CHECKED: TGL bExtg Linetype Legend SCALE; 0 Extg Sanitary Sewer Pipe —.—.—.— H'.1-.217 • V N/A Storm Sewer Pipe --•—.—.— � Extg Water Pipe --—•—•—•- DEC 200' Extg Cable Tv Lime --*—.—*— 3O5O-OO Extg Electric Line —.—.—r—r— 1g OREGON s SFEET I Extg Gar Llne — —1_ Extg Telephone Line — _ 71's I7. ` tin WM= C2.0 41M4 • • \ \ \ \ ♦ `.N. '''' 1,- N s. \\ �/ \ /� \ IXiSTING // \ y 3R / // 1� ERG CHAIN --- ,' '�/ -)1 /' I GATE _, i i kale 1" }' ��•/< I —...---e.......—..—_— 5412,...–_-__-_---1----_ -- — ..--- F I I I I I I / / \\ /' \\BUILDING / PROTECT ERG 1 SAWCUT LINE- -�- ' t i / ` // \ / RETAINING WALL / 1 ,, II // �' i A9 ,� `v/ \'_ _ REMOVE I /�_/ } % s S-Ln- !� -- — O i PROTECT EXTO l 9c;f J ERGS.• ALK /TAINING WALL e j �4 OVE ERG ` N / d '.'' of - - A� J J y\ � FENCE // 4 - .,,/ ` i \ 11 , .1 ? - : I 1 I \� ERG FlRE M pp / 9 . \a•\ ERG TREE - �'.-..-.-_: _ -r__ / t.AtlD�i1%IiCS' )/ HYDRANT /II c \ \ • r'° =e- / _ �c�- °9= - ': I TO BE I f RR I I __.�� % W E•\\ •\• � I I I I. Y \ r A y TECT / �'tle R T TG TORM\\ \a r'1' • I V� � I` ----1 EXTG TREF� FTa I Rd DETENTION PIPE \ •\Q a I, / pRp �J • .i. EXTG BUILDING I I E� — .. 173 • I EXTG CONTOUR \ I • ll1 TO 1 TO BE REMOVED I .4.\\ fe \ I \ OFj'" .� ___III ( )\\ ' ! ____•^ � i I�I,. \ \ \ _ N _ I TO BE REMOVED III I I ,,1••‘,\ \\ a \• PROTGE S . 1 \ t '`/.� I .•BE R BUILDING EMOVED TEO E REMOVED .�wi ----.111 PROTECT e M I 1 l\ CIO\\\ \ \aN♦ DLTG TREE i�� ' •• p I 1•i R ECI '' AB CrG I I -• F/ \ \ \ a �IGRESSlEGRE$$ 14- Iraqi I i R -_-_-4N- •-'4'\ z., c----•=__-___. I r I. LI� / I CURB CT EXTG • \ \ \ EASEMENT -, EXISTING \ \ i 1 - r, is s R ) \\ \ • v\ \ BUILDING �1.: i L, .>0 J 0 r � -�_ -�# -_ :••.'•,c7 1 I \iii■\\'\` \\` \°\aa\ "� -`/ , S II I - - - , r�-='�f�" REsMOVEEicr6,�{1yE Jti I ir' � iPROTECT M \\\\ \\ \ a� ;7- ." / REMOVE D(TO X1'7(' 1 -`_- t RB Cn'P) __L I 11----4111• - EXTO TREE O\\ \ • a • ! LUMINNRE 1 4 I t I �' .\ \ \ /�a�(\ I i PROTECT. J • bps: REMOVE I e T Y\\\\ \\ /`aY�, EXTG TREE ' . R / LTG . EXTG TREES i I ERG STORM \ Z i 1 TO BE • REMOVE IXrG ,i .R OTECT IXT68P0 a I I I CONTROL STRUCTURE REMOVE I O -' CATCH BASIN `. EXISTING IO DETENTION/ CT a A ) EX-1-0 CURB �'��_ / / �--�,� --_ - '1, .._ \ /� / PROTECT 0, y,� -- I' I j I 1 / REMOVE EXFO �� =el. �' ---I ` ri." \\ / EXTG CURB \/ - RBADVE IXTO R CATCH BASIN °I I INGRESS/EGRESS Ce�: \\\ '�, I PROTECT 17Cia sTM i 1 — 7rq I I I tt DES • /,� i p I / j ii ACCESS EASEMENT I II T/ N. \\ /coNrROLMANHOIE II c� I �,W+.r= 1 f.W • ' 1E Z I I a 1 i11I \I`�-.__ ll I•• `\ b % 32.79 " I r - } ._ - ` I I I ° i __ 0 Sri > l• I = '-- - ..• -PROTECT-EATS c Y '�, REIAwE 3Nli - .-.- ■///�■ Z .__ , , -, -`• PJPE\-------•--- -`�'--_ ... N ._•____y \...---....REMOVE ECM -•------------ C I o PROTECT ni. 1,‘ PROTECT'PUBLIC STORAGE'SIGN �. I 11ON CONTROL-., / t�\(TO CURB\ •O *\ GROUNDCOVER \ A 0 �' .• `1;\ \PROTECT ECTO' 7"_.'• PROTECT EM6 I"_-. _.._.__.____....(-._ Z O csi•-I ` I� Ti. PROTECT EXTO ` Ep A WATER METER «,ttTLfl P\QLE % 1, \ PROTECT ERG \� Cl- I`\ , SIGNAL POLE 'l R L.--- -----, _ / -4---_ \ EIRE HYDRANT 1 \ re PROTECT EXTG STORM PROTECT E RG A ___._._.__.-.__- Z 'a \ \ \ :I ,r ,. ;-, I' , \ CONTROL VAULT \ UnufES Z I t- ) J / i r __' - ,1---.... '__� — J / / / Jf ( ° Q 2. ,H1 / / / a / f__.._..___.._.t / I / J / aL :s / / / ti / 4- ---T-/- •'4► /SW PACT IC HIGHWAY / J /..► / o N ti /I / _ _) -- -/ / F/ / /t - r T _ / T � L/ J r L. i .\ . .\/ • I P \ N. � � = w�_ ,...-_.„7-_--i--.4,4 ,.....-------7- ce to 1712.— Ced } t I ' —a ;, DESIGNED: 111 DPS 1 r.=\ / f _ DRAWN:• I 1 — 4 I t DPS lit } CHECKED: `1 111 TGL i Extg Linetypa Legend SCALE: Q Extg Sanitary Sewer Pipe —••—.—e— I •p PRope H.1°=20 Extg Storm Sewer Pipe —"-•-.— :ti.i INFf STS V.N/A Extg Water Pipe -•-•-•-•— V 48087 NOV 2009 Extg Cable Cable TV Line —.- -+— r 3050-00 Extg Electric Line —g—'—'—•— OREOON = SHEET Extg T�ptrone Line —•—.—•—,— 4fw.CDLGHEpce RENEMS 12/31/2010 C 3.0 \\ \\ \\ \\ \. \ `\ // \ /n ExISnNG / �` ' N A,f, \ /// \\ // \\ BUILDING // / \\\ \.'`e` 3 , ,,--"'> LINK GA tl 1 < /\ MRO�q // I 2 _ i 'i �'--- \ \ a Scale 1 = 20 / \ = — \\ m tB 0 m 40 ,,o / / \ /// \ J / —\yr5' sAwakuNE __ — \ 81 may_+ / /- I / Yf L.g__.4.....,_ / / \ (�E: EXTG ai w ,'/ --� •4.,/ •�.', / STABILIZED \ Z x �\ UPI(FENCE i PROP TY 41 A .'� #--'1 \\ - '1 + I CONSTRUCTION `\ 0 o PROPOSED ) / NE(TYP) I �) ,(. , ;.� I 1 ENTRANCE \• \ f \ e \ \ \f A----' \ 1 '1 CURB �� N\ NISHED ;, I 1IPR\ e\+ GRADE CONTOUR R nu I ` �..E� ♦- f;; I II'/ II ) \ f 1 \\ N\�° I 1 I lI Ni 1 li 1 PROPOSED -46-- °�.44► ��I L,\\ \\f�f 1\: AUTOZONE BUILDING 'v��'•a� �� °° I \ \ N °\ i �\ :f . FF 236.00 i 440 I I `, tO � II In \\\ \\ \f \ \ EXISTING _:i „_al.‘ s_ - �il_ __-"-'1.:\---•-•:-.'"---1 _- - - lM�I 1 /_1 Itl / I • n I aR6 N. ECTO \ n BUILDING \ '� • i _ p:- 9 x \ -\ \ / \ i ii®® _ e _I .r I free, CI \ N \ \\■)'' se/ t I itiNVEMINIMMIROMMTIMWSNIfi # • / I ,: 4 ti li,,,::.0 ) . ‘ -N.-, \\\ , _....... , , + i, ,..., . ..... . . ..... i\\\\ � �\°tee f I / If ii� 1 / 1 7-,•Auk' ,� r�'� I !. I, SAM Z, ,\ { ° / ♦, A /♦ _ 11 PROPOSED I I I f/ O \\\\ I / I\ �I f_ l A I i W ! }� -�.__ 1 FLOW(IYP) �i �-�yv v— LL • . IX \\\ // I / .N P:1--, y \ '�� ,n. y i / I l y / IXTO DRIVEWAY E.�I \ l l y 0. if li rl ,..1.,.ri..+.. / ,�. --x—ie.—x .4 4.l4 .' >�muff R=T-AJ'x _.7_177._—�� ..'. ^ ��,� ..�- ,■�-. i s—y= — _ems i _._. _ U Z li\ \� t E l/IIp6fNg.• i\ f �+ \ AREA N O \ o ct N. \k ..\ ` : 4 i 1 T/ \ j PROTECT J �..__._—. - \ _____ ECG FIRE ` \ j W ` E7ff0 s ---. \ / ` ClA1B(TT) -/ ` LANDSCAPE HYDRANT, �~ k Z Q `\ : I.;_-,\ °�' f-, SW PACIFIC HIGHWAY \RETAINING WALL _ a O �? �..1 / srl. J HTa.7 4 C� f-./ / ;; / sit. n r sARwEF ••� / / I sar FENCE / / 1 / / 4' - f / _ _ /._.. / ga ii / / ,., / / / / / / /r..._ /�_._. 0 W `5 - • / 1 / / I t z_ 1 I..��. .�.... I._.._�_.....:.....� L.. ...._.1_ -4..`. �.- . g n W it , �.. �•% ; °+°` I' �O� '�� —.. . - _ C' .� ``,J( • ' _T_ ... V.t f ` ,��- I '•..J ••. ./ 1 / _y/• DESIGNED: N1/ 7j• .�I �•fY —,•—--i:l CPS C+1 S I ,! DRAWN: .rl \—4 9 OPS ttt I �� \ 4.,,. v.- CHECKED: x{ TGL Extg Linotype Legend ,• (5I'°p f H:C1=a Extg SanOary Sewer Pipe =i—+.—r— INfFRSS,Q v:wA Extg Storm Sewer Pipe —.—e— 4�7 5r. N V200 Extg Water Pipe —•—•—•—.- Extg CableTvLine —••—••—*- Ertg Electric Line —•—•—•—•— OREGON.} r SHEET Extg Gas Line sb�N r3 T'po� Extg Telephone Line —•—r—•—•— �S C. . RENEWS: 12/71/2010 C4.0 I :\Pn r. slim gs\F iOC° , 12, 1:5 1,dG 'V .' . r • .., / • / -'"° Ci) \ .i' . -/'-• / P c ' .' ♦ / .. 5 - • / \ _ o N,._.., \ / / • W d.—'�Tr\ /�� I ><// \yam ♦//° ,� \ G \ */4 4,./ I N. N. 'N �' \ #• 1 \ I \ / )I r \ I .t N. / \ ° -� I N \ /� \� ♦//• _' • N ----. / r \ �/ I \ N— 1 i1�« *i \ v t \ / , \\\ 1 /I � \\\ , — "1I\\ \\\ __ �� ,= i _`�P \ til A it a: ,, 1121 �IIEIZIENZIN NENa .1.le -1 mibf �, I \\ _� ,`� I.` II '.i �.... 1 a' sgQ'4 \� • vm � ✓ \ / cmz�5 • g to Cld r--- ..... - , 1 _1 \\ fa . -1 mo 1 A 1 m O 1-113 O �' ? GS' CD I I I !1 I� 1 � $h �, , w m \ \\ o0 y n \ e 1 a f t \��■ a /�/ I / '' IP.. I -J , Q) !?} I - _ae...- \ \r •� t f I I 71 i I :R �� - f m II • f j ✓p �� ®III ► � � L� : _ a.0I 1 / eI 1E t z 1 • I ; \ . ,III � 1 � � f" 1 ' \ �Fi: r I O \\ r„�r• '"• ,i \ �1 �aa� mrwi PP ,, \ )°r( \ 1 an ,-,..-- ,,1 I 8� II a• .,-.._.., .,. . • ��•-' I \\ get i 1 �! \ ir 1.51`. \ 3g ,J .21 ' ml --.- Mill r l,f �r th'�1 \ ` / , I \ � _ II \\`� i 1 n\ VIII \ :� • ' ( !pal \` ; .�/ �" r-.\\ I �i 0 A I Y \ 1 I r. 'I�j j I \ \ -° :-: \ :-: ate: Y: b. J �'' �.. I I 1 1 a . • — �• 1, , 1111 , �, _ =j\ _ �_ - - r-;.-1; r 1. 1. III \��1, w 1 ..1 \ l , 1 ii ,••i \� – - 77 n ;E m \\ \\ \ e,, I . 1 \ \ \ \ I 2 e o \, \ \ii , \ • '�. REQ ,r .... ,,,,.. ,.. ;4,0 n • s aoo w I61n street PRELIMINARY STREET AND STORM DRAINAGE PLAN FOR: ` HD r Vee72wel,WA 06660.282] w A o D1E L� 1 AUTOZONE STORE NO. 3756 5°� T N Z J60I696b]6]lar O DESIGN GROUP A SITE IN THE CITY OF TIGARD,OREGON mqn sllaatl ap a.aMe n,104n n,.... ..a .a ewe• 1 L• \. ,,," . \ \\ \\ \ 4\ - r \, -- \ �n Ex15TING i' \\ \'�r H`3 \ --/ \\ '/ \\ BUILDING �/ \ \ �,` Scale 1" = 20' \\ _.../ �\ -18 7 q l 20 10 0 m b co ) /' VAV �' V >' �— -� '/ // 1 a —----4.- /\ r /� -\J�� ',APPS' LOCJ�TKMI / / -✓ , N. / IXISTING / Of E2CTG SAN CO /•� r \ \ d r /� /: BUILDING / ��.� - _ - --�- — ' / �_ �/ \ \ 'E \ // \ / / I-.. .LOCATION AND CONNECT°,_j�� / -� / \ \\ / / \ /. \ / TO ExrG SANITARY II / _ i \ O �/ \\v/' \y'�i // O /� SEWER PPE L� �� /----- \\ CIS E ii ECG CHAIN �/ — ! ! _ \ 4 _ • i d/ I; `, 'Z'1^�a \ LINK FENCE PR: Y \ �'� 7 `- V PROPOSED LINE .. �,: . 1■ \ • CURB(TYP) r - -- — _ %'�\ 1 I I T%:-IFF-- \\\ W c �I — \\\ \`N• / / 1 \ COORRDIN CONNECTION TO I I � / ( � '/I ,\ .\e•\ r t I I;..` BULDINGWrmMECHANICALPLANS • i V,-;H \\ "�"rj'• \ I1. I ;UT LINE \\` Z;f•\ a I j� I t1 PROPOSED / _ I I I 1�. AUTOZONE BUILDING fI II I 1_,N`\\,\ \\;♦�.\` ) ` I FF 236.00 I .` \. \ I I i ,I: II3 s l i Ltd \`, \ \ ° \ WATER SERVICE LINE .._ F. I I 111::" I I n I EMI \ \ ♦ \ \ IXISTINO COORDINATE CONNECTION I ---- I1 )CURB \ '\ BUILDING / N. _ - i� 1 \\\ \\ N.♦\♦\ I/ / t _ . • ® -TO BUILDING WITH MECHANICAL PLANS / IJJ ��.i _ M y\ \\ /, r v \ i I,Y `\\\\ \\\ \♦\ ♦ e/: fist` / • I) I II�r-� I rlimnI Iat' .� 4 \ / i I ( . -, •� !� i r' oil _ — — — / *• / I L /Ti i ''i„l-/' \\\ BUILDING \ r \'♦ # a / I ,� -�' ` I = MANHOLE CI. \ \ 4.•/ 1 / / ♦N 1.- —_ 'I ! I ( - YETER AND CONNECT TO ---.. M. / I yy 1 1 I� - EXTG DRIVEWAY 2\,\ '/� / / I J t7CTG SERVICE LINE I _ r _ / /"• 1' rn / Ii \ Z w.■ tl _/ ! L �- � � r+' tea:. .r ' A .'. I I - _\ b c Ce 17'1 \ �� ` I � 4 h' r �s'•,� . .• . ..,. 4:310._ •—c a—c —a =a fr—c_--0—'—'—c—c—c—.—a_c—q --- 9.-1 ♦ S � aa a—a—a—a-9 y `�a— a 3J � ` p � ' r—. / ('�w)et N\ \� 1\\ 8 \�EkTG WATER J. \\\ \$� \ �. \ \$\ \N ,\\ W ix\ re \` �� + \ METER ,'\� N\ exrGCURH \� �'` \ t\1 �\ \ W Z \il i+ `� % �� It CV') \ •.l \ :_11 \ L \ 1 \ % j 7 311 PACIFIC,HIGHWAY, \ _ \ \ 1 �' CD ,1 / / ; /`1 / / / / i / ZNo /r / / / / // / / / / / y IO u / / / /'�'+ �/� / / / / / / / // / / ' i / / / / / / / '141 / / j / i % J L� . Z -L_p. = L. �.. s/ . / z --'714P-'. / .— / _° 7 t --•-(_'� ( • ;—'`; c Jr --r--- d a "L _- i —r— ___f�`' ;,' i. tJ ; �i \•-- , / DESIGNED:oPs • C1=o-�\ $ t >� •� DRAWN: DPs 1 i \..•/L \— a CHECKED: i TGL SCALE: Extg Linetype Legend s 0 PROs H r=a . Extg Sanitary Sewer Pipe —s—N.—w— ` .G"V qi/ Nov loos Extg Stone Sewer Pipe --.—a.—.— Extg Water Pipe -•—•—•—•- r 3050-00 3. Extg Cable Tv Llrle —•—^'— — OREGON = SHEET Extg Electric Line —r—r—'—f— 'Ski.. y6t e v at atg Gas Line - —c {VS O. L....V I Extg Telephone Line -'—"—'—'- l//••��_r//.�. RENEWS: 12/31/2010 l n•O PLAN NOTES: ,' e . . - 1. For MITIGATION: / // �O -a a..:••s:=: =_= e D o a o $ 1. For full text of the tree mitigation report,see associated tree report prepared by Joseph Hartgy t /� / - °--- --' h•4 of Harrity Tree Service,dated December 11,2009. \ / \ /' 64/4 2. There are three(3)existing trees on site larger than 12'(see plan this sheet for orations).Of \\ ,' \ /r . w. m those trees only one(I)will be removed.The one tree to be removed Is 18•.Since more than ' -u a 50%of the existing tree DEW on the property will be retained,Or Inches will require mitigation `� \V/ •O .,• •.• d p ° F per Tigard Development Code sections 18.790.030.8.2 and 18.790.060.D. 11 w $m 3. The mitigation requirement is met with three(3)new 3•caliper trees being installed Co pad of r✓ W =7r P T the development(see plan this sheet for locations). • -- (, _ TREE PROTECTION STANDARDS: •� 8>$Si n• Placing Material Near Trees: EXTG TREE M1 16 • _lI l a�`, qI No Deson may conduct any erllvgy equip the protected area tsany tree desgnated er remain, TO REMAIN 3:.. Inducting,but not Ilmged to,parWng equipment,placing solvents,stpdng building material and soli deposes,dumping concrete washout and locating bum holes.During construction,no person shall -- - n.a. attach any object to any tree designated for protection. �� . ', 4• PROPOSED i P ■ rolactive Barrier. MITIGATION _ Q Before development.land clearing,filling or any land alteration for which a tree removal permit is F s SITE required.the applicant shall: TREE(3•) _�_ - l' Erect and maintain a readily visible protective tree fence along the outer edge and completely I I I • • E)4TCa TREE#8(4•) v surrounding the protected area of all protected trees or groups of trees.Fences shall be PROPOSED I . - ---_TI-_,MAIN �' aL constructed of chain link and at least four feet high.unless other type of fencing Is authorized by the MITIGATION . MI -- I ,,f Director, TREE(3•) ''�^ Prohibit excavation or compaction of earth or other potentially damaging activities within the EXTG TREE#3 T i TO B TREE V(189 'y r1` �4 barters. ( TO BE R�I.ApVED I TO BE REMOVED 'I ': 1� VICINITY MAP J W Maintain the DrotecWe barriers in place until the Director authorizes thei removal or a final EXTG�� f49 THIS EXTG TREE NOT SURVEYED NOT TO SCALE certificate of occupancy Is issued,whichever o c c u r s first _ _ _ = I ' `� --' - - YG REMAIN LOCATION IS APPROXIMATE EXTG TREE#2 16 O`_ _ FIELD ADJUST PLANTINGS AS Ensure that any landscape work done In the protected mite subsequent Iv the removal of the ^\TO REMAIN t __ __•a _ __ I NEEDED TO)VCTUAL LOCATION barriers shall be accomplished with light machinery or hand labor. \ / \ ,'r R =a_--`-_zv a- - Y _y _ ,f' �\ In addition to the above,the Director may require the following: ✓ \\ '/ 064' I ,• EXTG TREE#7 6 It ♦ °'^ `; / e4ea4 EXTG TREE#4(69/ k \ .-■_� _ TO REMAM 1 1 (N1 Cover with mulch to a depth of at least 6 inches or with plywood or similar material the areas • e TO BE REMOVED - - - 11 n;uflgroy zodm dad by heavy -EXTG TREE#6(�I A II Minimize root t deep trench,at edge itical root zoly L TO G REMOVED of trees to be retained. O I `� LEGEND Have corrective pruning performed on protected trees In order to avoid damage from machinery or building activity. PROPOSED MITIGATION i \ M Maintain trees throughout construction period by watering and fertilizing. ifs 3') •1,y 3'TALL SCREEN II 11 PROPOSED DECIDUOUS TREE Grade: ;!6^n► WALL(lYP) .•r I i' \•The grade shat not be elevated or reduced within the critical cool zone dimes to be preserved _ y eliTittREE:................__ __. _ _ _ I ' ti •it without me director's authorization.The director may allow coverage d up to one hall of the area of r`0 i ® a ` 9 _ 0 the tree's critical root zone with light solls(no day)to the minimum depth necessary to carry out t I I grading or planting plans,N N wel not Mpedl the survival of the tree.Aeration devices maybe 1.' ) PROPOSED CONIFEROUS TREE Adak required to ensure the tree's suMval. 4• _ 1 _ — --- a lip II the grade adjacent to a preserved Tree Is raised such that N could slough or erode Into the tree's h.•�' 1 `,`S��—, �• ..�. _><� s r.•.s� Z i critical root zone,N shall be permanently stabilized to prevent suffocation of the roots. .2s""'.. The applicant shall not install an Impervious surface within the critical root zone of any bee to be _ EXTG CONIFEROUS TREE 11•1 retained without the authorization of the Director.The Director may require specific construction •t 4"• r methods and/or use of aeration devices to ensure the tree's survival and to minimize the potential ; .._._ -- — --- ._- for root induced damage to the impervious surface. . . • •• f'• EXTG DECIDUOUS TREE Ce To the greatest extent practical,utility trenches shall be located outside of the critical root zone of ,, __ ____ _ __ Z trees to be retained.The Director may require that utilities be tunneled under the roots of trees to ---•-� �•' �• ••-••••- 0 be retained N the Director determines that trenching would significantly reduce the chances of the _---___ -._ _ I - _ _ - _ - __ - 0 tree's survival. EXTG DECIDUOUS TREE W �__._._. .__• ..__.._.......................�__ f X TO BE REMOVED I. T Trees and other vegetation to be retained shall be protected from erosion and sedimentation. • • SW D A/s I CI c HIGHWAY A V Clearing operation shalt be conducted so as to expose the smallest practical area of soil to erosion .7 TT rlili r fl V fl i,/1 I ■•� -- LANDSCAPE AREA EDGE LT. CO 0 ci for the least possible time. To control erosion,shrubs,groundcovers and stumps shall be • maintained on the individual lots,where feasible. Z ? ? ∎X—x— TREE PROTECTION FENCE a Directional Felling: • d WI Directional felling of trees shag be used to avoid damage to trees designated for retention. •� -••-�~ -----------•••• J IL Additional requirements: •sa �... .•rn•s a.s.:e a:__ ---_:_:_..:_._� -____ s==s=aa=ss=•==.: •vs•a The Director may require additional tree protection measures which are consistent with accepted .a••'.w• -' s= =_s_ - - --- O urban forestry practices. t •aS �__ ~ 0 Trees shown to be preserved may be removed to accommodate necessary construction provided --�- ••--^•^ 1 p "-� 4/�f\} _ O '�.- r O F 0 . the project meets the minimum requirement of 30 tree units per acre. 4..... 'O_4)'' its(__)_ i W I IX 0 CI W MIN DIST FROM TREE W • EQUAL TO DRIP LINE < i- U FOR EACH TREE AS SHOWN ON PLAN W l- a Q GAL STEEL CHAIN LINK MESH ON /STEEL FRAME BARRIER FORMROUND TRUS STEEL FRAM TO FORM CONTINUOUS TREE. DESIGNED: i PRELIMINARY DRAWN: in SUBJECT TO AGENCY REVIEW MPA NOT FOR CONSTRUCTION CHECKED: CONCRETE WEIGHT OR STEEL BRACKET JAN AI EXTG GRADE ANCHORING ENCE SYSTEM RMLY EERECTRFORO •a ' E*�d . HSCALE:0' DURATION OF PROJECT V:N/A ��' FEB 3 50.201p 3050-00 en dpNANUrtgeocK E" Scale 1„=20' yyt, OREGON �� SHEET Tree Protection Fencing 20 l f I I s11�o-1g L1.0 NOT TO SCALE c"PE ARL� L1.0 \'‘ < 0 =-____• o-o-o-�� \ \ 5 TTP �• \ 49 \ \ -O T ? , -- S" - CIIi) 125VT� �/ GWF _ .._/ y- IA [ 1 TZS I,•.•• ;;�� r -4 .`e^Jjj'o_ ,TZS exseri ... ............... `•�`''' �, 10 sND s 0 Sic ' — . TR EE SITE r y 3 i 2 TAP L!:t! ,,p: 22 SPL g Si 4 SVT •' ' I ■ ID J' Y serd-44.-IL --' -p " p a ^� TOREMCID000STREE I Iii TA EE MAP TO REMAIN(TYP) — - i THIS EXTG TREE NOT SURVEYED NOT TO SCALE GAU i` .� • !'I1 FIELD TADJUST PLANTINGS AS gC p- \ - •—.I III NEEDED TO'ACTUAL LOCATION 'IS I �' V ' , u .I _ 1::: t ' �� qI EXTG • PLAN NOTES: W esIOo 1,.�� u 1 TZS �~"`a 7 SIC " el INSTALLATION: ii�;•^..""� - }� � 1. The contractor shall install the landscape according to these plane,details and the specifications. 1 TAP 4 1 TZS 00 o\ 2. All plantings shall be Installed according to accepted planting procedures. EXTG CONIFER TREE 12 SIC 7 SIC V i((;,T 3. The plant materials dhoti be of high grade,and shay moat the sired and grading standards of the American TO REMAIN(TVP) .'---mss _ w0 Standards for Nurberg Stock(ANSI Z60,1-1986,and any future revisions). •--�%�— �� • ' PLANTING SPECIFICATIONS,DETAILS,AND LEGEND: i ��ilrealL__ 3'TALL SCREEN GALA L, 'IV 3 SVD ;� N. General notes,tree protection requirements,and plant list Is on the sheet. ,,- W ALL(TYP) / B TKP 4 ` Planllrq delaBS and specllicatlons will be Drovided as part of the final submittal package. • d M r• - - _ _ - - �_ _ _ _ _ "�.+--,� l 1 IRRIGATION: c>at Z I: •' I Irrigation will be provided b an automatic underground system capable o1 providing adequate water to planting `"a i _ _ - • I I d throughout the year.The irrigation system will be design build by the landscape contractor. ,a t t i �-ma a m.g`.m 11: Saw.aYa 1 ROOT BARRIERS: in •} �� I. sa.y.�. .:,.s: ``_se'x .. awe...-s des. Trees planted within medians anchor planting ships with less than 8'width shall be Installed wah root barriers at edge of walks and wits.It �.. TURF GRASS •••• 5.082 AREA CALCULATIONS: M 5.082 S.F.(15%of Ste)PROPOSED j..._. ___._..__.............____._.----_ - . 5,070 S.F.(15%ol SlId REQUIRED 'I • : 4.• f- GENERAL PROVISIONS: O t 1. The owner,tenant and his agent.if any,shall be jointly and severally responsible forth.nrbt.nance of all ._... ...-..._.____._-._.._._.___-„-_--_„_ .»"... I. 1••••—•-^- ---'•'••'�--••- landscaping antl screenin which shall be maintained in I- 9 w good condition so as to present■healthy,neat one t _ _ _ _ orderly necessary,appearance.shall be replaced or repaired as necessary,and slue be kept k.m kern refuse and • j - - —_. - - debris. ---'-'-"--'”-”- '-""'- 2. All plant growth in landscaped areas of developments shell be controlled by pruning,aMri g or otherwise t. SW PACIFIC HIGHWAY a. It will not interfere with the maintenance or repair of any public unity us*j •♦ _ S. It w@ not restrict pedestrian or vehicular access • .._...��..__.....................___....-.-..._..__.._.._.....__.._..-.....__.__..._..___.__•..._._..._ �.._._._..___...W_._�..-A� �.._.�_....._.._.._.._. .... c. It will rot constitute a traffic hazard because of reduced visibility. UNI I. 3. Certificates is occupancy been shall not be provtl unless the they of Tigard landscaping requirements as to os have been d.b or other 1 t � arrangements have been made and approved by the Ctty of Tigard such as b posting of e bad. IX :«.. --_- _-- ------- — .-- ---------------- 4. Appropriate methods for the care and maintenance of street trees and landscaping materiels eNd be provided by the owner of the property abutting the rights-of-way unless otherwise required tor.net en y Z t •j ( conditions and the safety of the general public 0 j :"` r - 5. No trees.shrubs or plantings more than 18'In height shall be planting in public right-of-way abutting 8 •e.. a LLI ----_,--1 • .i" roadways having established curb a. queer. I _ 1 . r ,r 0 0.,.. cc cc 4 F_. QLL PLANT LIST LEGEND w 1-0 SYM QTY I NAME SIZE&CONDITION I SPACING Q O w TREES O PROPOSED DECIDUOUS TREE [n Z IN U Acer plalanoitles'Crimson Sentry' TAP 3 3'cal.;8'-10'Tall:BOB As Shown Z Cdrnsnn Sentry Norway Maple Z TKP B Koelmuleda paniculala 2'cal,;8'-10'Tall;B&B As Shown J O I.- cadenrain Tree r I- Th ja plicate'Wass-ens' PROPOSED CONIFEROUS TREE Q' I U TTP S 6'-8'Tall;BOB As Shams Vlrescens Cedar Z 0 Zelkova sonata'Village Green' W 8' TZS 6 village Green Zelkova 2'cal.: -NY Tall;B813 As Shown J C PROPOSED SHRUB LU SHRUBS IL Iles crenate'Convexa SIC Convex Japanese Holly gal.container 3'-6'O.C. :,•,, __ EXTG CONIFEROUS TREE d Q Nandina do/n.6.'Compacfa' SND 10 Compact HnaveNy Bamboo 1 gal.container 7-6'O.C. '` DESIGNED: • Prunus laurocerasus'Otto Luyken• PRELIMINARY JAN SPL 22 3 gal.container 3'-6.O.C. SUBJECT TO AGENCY REVIEW Otto Luyken Laurel EXTG DECIDUOUS TREE DRAWN: 553 3 Viburnum davidii 3 gal.container 3'-6'O.C. MPA NOT FOR CONSTRUCTION CHECKED: _David Viburnum LANDSCAPE AREA EDGE JAN SVT 22 Viburnum tinus'Spring BoqueY 3 gal.container 4•-6•o.c. S T L F SCALE: Spring Boquel Viburnum 41...C. 440 44O NCO H.r=20' GROUNDCOVERS V:N/A FE 0070 GAU 1B155F Arctosfaphylos uva-ursi 4"pot 50-0f��,�, KlnnlcyJnnkk fir • GWF Waldsteinia lragaendes L"' JOHNS.NUTTBROCK f:- 0 o 0 o v 375 SF Barren Strawberry 4"pot 1'-0'O.C. 7 GJ SHEET TURF GRASS SOD 20 Scale o1"=20' �eJs OREGON `.4v • • 2.277 SF 'Overtime'Seed Mix As Available from Sunmark Seeds I I I I (�d pE p3c L2.0 Portland.OR;503-241-7333 • I CR) COPYRIGHT 2007 72'-0" 59'-5" FINISHED WALL TO FINISHED WALL w cn 0 1' •1" I I '• 4. I- I IIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIII .rt • rn o I I � I _ �1 IC—J-1 U Co G �J " 8 _ _ N _ _ _ , r > .� Z z al, O z 6 —, 0 in 6 - O p 1� 1=1 0 Z m 1=1 C7 �'1 m N ,o a p :' —II W, o 39'COUNTER ii " z co YA HEIGHT it Q 2 MMAIllir 01.1.10 WI WI Ili4mill X411 EMI i 0 I 241MIM . IM Illj 1 I — L.— _ 0 ICI lAiv4 71IM 0 ... I• 6 1 2')0' 12'-8" • C-0" '-4 J TN 1V l'' i3 1r. „1■ b r- \ ■ ] Z •••2• m2 D D m Z ROOF SLOPE m DIRECTION OF —1 / C) m m m z m 0 ■❑MMO 8;7-=® ..`j• ] 1 ®fin ❑❑❑n❑ 00 ›O O= !► Z� \ / C) I ■ .�1 Architect: ARTHUR NAVE AutoZone Store No. 3756 REVISIONS D rn t 123 South Front Street 13405 SW PACIFIC HWY 1 4 Memphis,Tennessee 38103 2 5 N 00 TEL: FAX:(901)495-8969 0 For Bidding&Contractor Information Contact: TIGARD OR 97223 3 6 F.W.ligt§Mail Room Tel.615-884-1017 FLOOR PLAN / DOOR SCHEDULE /WALL DETAILS PREFINISHED ALUMINUM COPING COLOR:BLACK 2 SMOOTH FACE CONCRETE MASONRY UNITS SEE PAINT DETAIL SCHEME THIS SHEET 1 © WALL MOUNTED LIGHT FIXTURE EQUAL , 5 EQUAL 18 O PIPE GUARD WITH RED SLEEVE g ID ' - 0 MEG.WHITE EXTERIOR INSULATED FINISH-PAINT WHITE r--""' yv © PAINT MAN DOOR RED&METAL FRAMES BLACK +1 /� +16'-10• O DO NOT PAINT OVERHEAD DOOR PAINT ANGLES BLACK J B.-.11.10" —,��//'1UtoZOne J.B.H. 0 EXPANSION JOINT O ALUMINUM STOREFRONT- RED KYNAR FINISH v `) `\ ` GLASS AND ALUMINUM DOORS - CLEAR ANODIZED FINISH \ \ \ \� \ '01 ‘ 11 \` \ FLOOR FINISHED ® 6•CLOUD SIGN-SEE SN SHEETS is �� /FLOOR WALL ® TOILET WALL VENTS PAINT TO MATCH WALL (HIGH SIDE) ID STORE ADDRESS -6•WHITE REFLECTIVE NUMBERS © © © 0 o/ 0 0i 0/ 0 © 0 , ® SCUPPERS AND DOWNSPOUTS.PAINTED TO MATCH BACKGROUND WALL COLOR.ADJACENT 4.H. X 6"W. OVERFLOW SCUPPER. FLOWLINE 2•ABOVE ROOF. ci'i Z O BOND BEAM AT ROOF LINE 0 . LEFT SIDE WALL SIGN -LSWS >g g z 18 . HVAC UNITS SCREENED BY PARAPETS CV 7 W r I/B'- 1'-0- AWN01W Iv. +16'-10• 2 ELEVATION KEY NOTES Z 0 J B.H. _ +14)-10 .,iii. J.B.H. 0 NOTE: CENTER ALL WALL SIGNAGE VERTICALLY ON N Z r THE PAINTED ORANGE STRIPE. PAINT ORANGE ti Q STRIPE TO WITHIN 2' OF WALL SIGN. DO NOT °. U) 1-• 7 ll PAINT ORANGE STRIPE BEHIND SIGN. Z —$` r "- / LEFT SIDE WALL 0 co 16 ti e 06 4) 0 �' > o-) = w 6 0 J PRE-FINISHED Z I W COPING: BLACK 2 U CC 15 18 :-:-:-. 1•••••-- COLOR: WHITE d 0 co=�- COLOR: ORANGE o • r 1 - _ _::,==_-_____ COLOR: WHITE O p W Ix / I Y' ti; COLOR: DARK GRAY N o Q Nil:310H".45, �° kl- -G~, AL+14'-10• i == ° _ x J.B.H. { COLOR: RED 5 A 0 W == COLOR: WHITE < ~ COLOR: MEDIUM GRAY .may COLOR: DARK GRAY a FINISHED FLOOR C 00 — — -- - REAR WALL a ' (LOW SIDE) 1/8"- 1.-Er AWEO1 pp v ® © O m © 3 EXTERIOR WALL COLOR SCHEME > M z a) `. a) E 18 ,4 ,_, n ® © p wH +16J'-.BI. . C --- -- ------ - N - - - }l4-10 - O Sa4 CD "1V J.A.H. C/) E cr, 1? 111.11 LJ U M N , ' M - I RIGHT SIDE WALL © 0 © 0 p O 09-01-09 65W2-R J.B.H. = JOIST --- - BEARING HEIGHT 1/8- - 1'-a' A. 2 1 EXTERIOR ELEVATIONS • N./ . 1 ••\ LUMINAIRE SCHEDULE ^' •0.1 •0.1 •02 •02 •• 42-'10.1 0.1-'•0.1 •0.1 •0.0 5.,421 Label ON Came Mr. Dean. Lem FY La.,w uF w•. F2 6,,-`r •0.2 '02 , ••,Ong 'n 2 'n 'n 1 \ --------- IS • + KAD oEUSr cLr1oFF .1111 wArr mum. OIa1101.Ea 52000 0.72 455 / uMxAnE wax rouse rl.Lce 7 SIDE MELD • q 9 2 DAD QOM R.M8 01E-CAST CUTOFF 40 WATT METAL 100ettO1.ES 52000 0.12 ,>� 40.1,O4 '0.5, •0.5 •0.4 •0.4 •0.3 •0.2 •0.1 •.Q ..1 i LUMNNIE rem llousE ru1nE • 511E MELD •0.2 0-6 '0.7 •0.7 •0.6 •OS '0.4 9 '02 '0. •0.1 a C s 46 Op. C.5-sw21wu.- tl0•ra PIe1MYF1•-Ip11TM5 0..E-,r Fsw11•3 J. 14000 on ,va uheo •0.3 •0.4 •0A •1A •1.3 •1A .1A •1.3 '0.3 '02 •0.1 '0.0 •0.0 •0.0 •0.1 •,. •I .2 �O.l� '1.0 ,1.1� 0. , •0.9 •0.7 •0. .0.3 • •0.1 uSTATISTICS � `D•'03 •O .0_0-'13 '+� I+ • ■__ •_•_ ■ •• •. , •• 'n 0• R i'qt• •1.7 •1.4 '0. •OA '0. •02 • - •OA •0.E •12 '1.7 `2.1 '2.9 '33 t: •2.0 •2.8 •2.7 .5 •2.6 '2.3 '1. •0.5 '0.i •02 I Cm Dar el + l'k '.Fk I°k x.A N,A •0.4 •0.€€ •1.5 •22 '2.9 '3.3 •3.8 r I 7 '3.4 •3.6 '3A •32 `3.6 '3. A '0.6 '0. •0.2 400 watt meld horde �C sh,xbos light fixture •0.2 •0.7 '1.9 •2.8 '3.9 '4.4 '4.3 '32 '3.8 •3.7 •3.8 '4.0 •3.9 •1. '0.7 '0. •02 two per pole,forward throe '0.2 '0.4 •1Dr •4.4 4.8 4.4 •4.0 r3•e 113.9 '3,9 '4,0 '3.9 '4,1 •3.6 17 •0.9 '0. .0.3 l'' Z II. MI•02 O. '1.7 '3.9 •4.6 •4.7 4" l� "3.8 •4.0 •4.1 •4.3 •3.9 •32 •4 •12 '0. •0.3 I II") O 5•sq.steal pole 11 bronze Nish > '0.2 •0.L,--I.7 •2.6 '3.6 •4,0 •3.8 I 11 4.0 •3.9 `3.9 •3.7 •4.0 •3.7 5 `1.7 •0. '0.2 •11 l Note: cu co •0.• '2.2 '2.7 '3.0 •.8 . ^� 11 4.1 •3.7 •3.5 •3.5 •4.4 •4.4 1 12 '1.2 'O. '0.1 --..FFF Anchor bolts `,' to be / -----•1.3 '1.8 '2.5 '3.1 3.7 Jlid71JCdllnialla-inlI it ICL11C0'11.52 .3.7 '3.5 •4.1 • . 12 '0.7 4o. t'0.2 f, II �0 a installed �` - O perpendicular s'll to curb on `0.4 '0.: •1,0 •1.6 '22 •2.5 '2.9 • '.2 15.0 4.1 •3.8 '3.7 •4.01 •5. 7 •.7 182 5.7 •3.6 •3.6 `3.4 •. , •1.6 •0.1 •D.1 ` •3y ( o single heod D poles. Rotate S1 ,r. It: ( 45 degrees co) `0.4 •0.: •09 •13 '20 '2.6 `35 •.1 16.6 4.4 4.0 '3.8 '3.7 `e5. .8 47.1 `!- .9 4.1 '3.7 . i '1.5 '0.I •0.3 I $ to diamond N boll pattern r- / '0,3 .0.- •0,7 '1.0 •1.6 '2.5 '3.6 •52 •52 '4.8 '3,8 '3.6 '32 .3.3 4., -- t�\ on dual head / '5A 'S.9 •B.0 •43 •3.8 •3.3 • --1 '1,1 •0. '0.3 ` .des. r- im 4 anchor bolts ' 1 •1.0 •!.8 •!.9 •3.9 `3.1 •2•• •2.3 `.9 '0.8 •0. •0.3 furnished aodt Ce •0�,0.• •1.0 •1.5 •3.3 •4.3 •4.1 •3.7 •3.0 `3.0 •2.8 •2.7 3.,` J ul by O O •0 3 7�a. r n ..� - . •02 Mon O �`O IIII1jyIIIU • _- _• Rub Set pa4°a ccecrete 7- _1 ,---- `a----. . - - - : • •• • : b0>c M, h �� . . . . . . • • • . . _ 2121 2121 --- -- •. •. •1 4 •.' i � _21 21. -. ----- - _- -1/ ■ r-�._ 3/4•M,nd10 Cr) I 02 0.3 \0.4 0.6 .8 1.1 •1.3 1.4 1.4 1.4 1.2 1.2 1.2 1.1 1.1 12 1. 1.5 1.5 1.4 1.3 1.1 0.8 '0.7 '0.6 '0.4 •0.3 •02 . M� O _ Y Finish grade or 0 e top of paving, Z LL �_ See site plan U Z •02 '0.2 0.3 •0.4 `0.6 •0.6 •0.7 *OA '0.8 '0.8 'O.A4"•0.8 •0.8 •0.8 •0.8 •OS •0.8 •0.8 •0.8 •0.8 '0.8 '0.7 '0.6 '0.5 •0.4 `0.3 `0.2 0.2 �I�, for location 2 O Q ��` Ina 24•db.concrete O) \ 4.18,- 41 I,g base.See shat 50 C (/) 0 a- for reinforcing o 11.1 SIN PACIFIC HIGHWAY 2121. Electric conduit Q CO TYPICAL LIGt1T POLE CATALOG NO. 1 0 unimme4( ..,"•"' KAD LOOM Arm-mounted Soft Square Cutoff `o TYPE NO. 309 NAME 2-3 2-3 FloodPak Series FPM p °1 FFJI7ORES i SREGRCARDMS 1r- I N �r arr. = M 00 .1104,1_w Y....1..•x err roar a ue KAD R2 Tr•.newel KAD R3 Ta.11131010: ON caenNm-soft b<.L,n moor•.r..W,q..N fY.S•.w 11.b11y4q KAD R3 RJ H..113i11l13 ern Q� FloodPak Series PHGI9IEIIBI� E0-r,a•._�W. w.__.. r..-2121 a KAD ...21.1.21.., ..,•..•sex•_ • ..,x..,.•r U Cb amen 0•s,.4.tr_r mama LO NTCD 1112 /, ftMxw.nUM 96,316 66 ere.NNW '•`'■■■r, ` , M FPM r �wRl•�■ r ....... .•UM9mG._.re.k.w... �.\ i ��\■■■ i ■�'�■■■ _ r JJJ1�1 «.«a.e..n,.•xr YETAI IMIIOE .• 1■■■ !iIU -,//r' ar e, _Ar4e4.nre.. .,..1 e,M U 110W,9W.TAL )CON. 1■■■ \ ,11Yr.[Y1YR,•10ApY.1 4Jj r �r!/I^� , _0.m...�a.0°.,-.x�aMw..,eu.� aeN.aow.svN.lasw I. ■ ;Ow IL c rr°a IOTAF.a.�. ■ , E�CIr1..,I_��11 ,awn F...x .•,F.re r_•••.r•reasa..•e �Ij� METAL 5a.m1 :. . .,��.1�,■■ I ��I�■■.I 1 I I I I ■ ■■■■ a °ir��11■■. '•, FPF11 ■WRIA 1■■i EI\ll @JPAl1�l 1a01EALMRM-•M,..r,a...er...w.row.. "�••,'■■• ! N •F-1 L1, ■ _ 1O.- ` 1 iw r•ri wssx.vww�IwMV M..e. ■■■1�■■. i ■■■1�■■• ■■■■��■• O �,i =^'y! I I Iu.i I of I d Ea \1\r% \`riJl� I`. r 6.;664461.6,r�,Ml. .x6ft .aY.11.- .� ro Nor MYUR' r ` ` 0•°1"i•fiWM.e ear run Woman.tau led... 1.175, uw 41f. ••r..:=4...aw,-.,•r w..u. .r.c. .'rte...::.' •r'-- 1.., rte,• ;♦pECIFIDAT10111 .,r/ 1 r ■.\\�%1 wr.xand.•�Irs-. ..u•ear11.w wily .t�W .• . it -4 00 IiW.1 M.r N.* 114.I •nm,•u.1' •M 11.0.0..a.a '•' OR. Lade II1lt 1111 e• . • 1 ,21.21 0....'.T....»�-^- 1.66 66.66 dun s•. Inlw d.21..o.e F•4•.kyr°- r r ._ • r r r r r r • •6 r r 2161,55-Yl•e..M.r.[1•Gn.•Ir°.••r•r a.Ny •1.II-Illes.e I-rI KAD R4 T.ea 11111001 KAD R4R81•.e.15m1m KAD RSS T..ma'110111., • .c 1101 6..., .woe n10I '^w•• ,.r•.,•N.rr,r..Y.•.e bar.,.el •r•..2rR.0 131 eN 131 MSW w,� 4--• .••• - ...,.. N1,tle„ •INC.*.can.xrls• •1011 PAW NIr 1.1755.45 r 220 Derr...... arms. ...tame 0 ,y ns.irm rF.s l.1Y •...udaeaavro lap ORDERING INFORMATION bags W10iE111Ep1111 • !1■■■■'r N■■■■■. �`lv...,, �"• O .r•I MAW 1 'F~GI 2)S•tr 6*er°..•n r �s 1 w„1•wa.11°•.a M.. .011111W1 : ..�•: r.�-....••re"vu r+M.."' EF•i' • " C/0 E O\ NO......°a.•4.1aae 1•OO.a•nl.ran ►;111■■■ ••••§0.MEMO; ^,!:iii■■■ •40:,.,.M dr1Rlvls ,10.001.55.1 1ynI r .a COPS... Ia s\ s\ �'138) U M ....sear....a AN !f 1 *1..1 ran 21.... I I 01 .r, I I +�- i '%iIHNE■, 1 !PJIf1\■■, I Jh1■■■. $~ N [w a.m.e 0O6 PAM •1 ......1... Pr,.....fM .n•x..F.a.. ......OM I 1 Q f • -' •.e▪r•.w 007.11110. en lrr6r. r Buts 1 .s.r z° ,f t ....-er 0r �Fw.rrv.r O MAO rOEIFLfw..km 11.Me De. S • ■■■■I■■ ■■.1■■■, FI00.ILp[-Ie•M,e.••..'rsM•. FP.•I..anea Meer s.1 w+ I m- eD �•■■• „�■■ -�,I■■■ FRM10-Mena Mr Car. fa re msr .i,.e pang F6 dues '�_I�r a. °s a D ° m- R •2121..•.6 MO �' OES Mr ■•■■I•■• FbOpMMOe•' .FF O•F,l°,FnP ReOSe-1WW R.N. •Or•CrRitbflwPWa1F JJ m-' .0 •°.•r..a l..F I•lar..r.....�. MI0. • • • • , . a r 306'WAY.nbe he N r FR--Erne 001.0rd ear 10 re Cbrp.sbar.e red ern G1.bMY•alore•- ■,�, ,a•..aawr'wems,0.0 'S.. m-, TI' w.1011 we•Fj6i•v_n fxa ...w ue ONS.6..w.. s•r,wr.ww .a x rw x14 ...6.•�x•.e-.. .n.mq.r rack an°varl or rabr 6•Irerek r .la >� Me t .xml" wn- .....• _ _ F•Y•M,r•fe.Fe e1. RMm-ibM pr.'�4ry YwendW.� r r r • _. r r dd. Cr rD L� 0tl.10.50 wM WS sxv�ws•a1M WLNwa area re tr,.e,..w.•.wew•6O.a. R5®-HOre_•rFL.a •dr...010Mn1 1MMIIMI.�we11_._•.x. 1 IMWrn re.M. CYtLhrib. OMN..•r, Mabelp..LwWM • t.V.M.r.010fa RV,asoa 111 45. 100....-xd MMI It1Y.OM No M M..Fe 00 y..,. Axn M. •nare end.•i�••'P. 0 Dam a....•..• W•1..,..N nM m r Ia...i....r o.N x4.. _v 131.01•..r..M. n..•r ...1'�f'i•.n.....W, Inallieleleinallenall •LL w1..m1a.tr10a. 1,•21+114~1.21 nes RI........Fen Mtru f1 1 K a♦ x a reenrw.e sex,1. ..a...I.... °Yn.P 1.1... ...armed nom .mob 10 1ion1 n• Rf M. .11..AIF 1310 0wee.be' wsem....r.r1 .F•.W rxw Fi mO - ,.1 0.,110.,F..r •C.pu..•LL.1V.a• 11MO O.F.....e. AR 1104.440 n mM w�•ra �•.. fVr10��.MI I1�1 I�� sale e.anor eot.o �, q«s...nR 10.1 ..rvrx -..r• a-..r-...r.. 1 E.e�I•YE;• 666 p1.i..1n.,f/stl6 Yr/. p0 •--•ywr...•:wrr w---.•.. - �.�.+1 ▪•.re...e..a••. Nam..11•66•16•1161•6•4644•4•1_m 0.71141L 66. 1 . 08-24-09 • E421w DO ua,.wx..a M Der.ar.21Y••a6* .r Noc e..+-.r..r:i.�.«, Aar.4lrr.r.law10b .n ln..,Fro.a,e•.r,.n 11Own os•Oa . 4.00•.r ?W a uw er Up as*....•21-..21 ....21._.r.,.r........ore 2121-ram..,,..,...••........-.,, 65W-RIGHT we..°.ew ear 2121.r,. . .n.re non. ern -Mni.N -r� •r. t -- •M N 1.,6140.6• a... �..r.a� ..._ .. .• 1 214 C 1 �rr ran - x.. cr. '�f SKIN �r e... ...54 721.131 rd. m.ura r xaM-w.r.__.__whore Ei•I ant uar An,d,B01.mI... ti YSS.z 46.49..NI.do Iq, 110kor U.•IA041 AIJn Sheet e:ODJA wrlax.°.e.cr..w 44:4•116 LAND USE PROPOSAL DESCRIPTION TIGARD 120 DAYS = 7/8/2010 FILE NO.: SITE DEVELOPMENT REVIEW (SDR) 2009-00007 FILE TITLE: AUTOZONE RETAIL STORE OWNER: Bar-Am,LLC APPLICANT: AutoZone—Store Development Isaac Baruch Department 8320,Mitch Bramlitt 1416 3`d Avenue 123 S. Front Street Seattle,WA 98101 Memphis,TN 3 8103 REQUEST: The applicant is proposing to demolish an existing building and construct a 6,800 square foot auto-related retail business on a .84-acre parcel. Site improvements will include a new building,32 parking spaces and associated landscaping. A new sidewalk will be constructed along the front of the lot. Access ways will not be affected. LOCATION: 13405 SW Pacific Highway;Washington County Tax Map 2S102CB,Tax Lot 01802. ZONE: C-G: General Commercial District. The C-G zoning district is designed to accommodate a full range of retail, office and civic uses with a City-wide and even regional trade area. Except where nonconforming, residential uses are limited to single-family residences which are located on the same site as a permitted use. A wide range of uses, including but not limited to adult entertainment, automotive equipment repair and storage, mini-warehouses, utilities, heliports, medical centers,major event entertainment,and gasoline stations, are permitted conditionally. APPLICABLE REVIEW CRITERIA: Community Development Code Chapters 18.360, 18.390, 18.520, 18.705, 18.745, 18.755, 18.765, 18.795 and 18.810. DECISION MAKING BODY BELOW: ❑ TYPE I E TYPE II ❑ TYPE III ❑ TYPE IV] COMMENTS WERE SENT: MARCH 12,2010 COMMENTS ARE DUE: MARCH 26, 2010 ❑ HEARINGS OFFICER (MON.) DATE OF HEARING: TIME: 7:00 PM ❑PLANNING COMMISSION (MON.) DATE OF HEARING: TIME: 7:00 PM ❑CITY COUNCIL (TUES.) DATE OF HEARING: TIME: 7:30 PM E STAFF DECISION (TENTATIVE) DATE OF DECISION: APRIL 26, 2010 COMPONENTS RELATED TO THE PROJECT AVAILABLE FOR VIEWING IN THE PLANNING DIVISION I E VICINITY MAP E DRAINAGE PLAN E IMPACT STUDY ® SITE PLAN ® STORM WATER ANALYSIS ❑ TRAFFIC STUDY ® NARRATIVE ® TREE PLAN ® OTHER: MISCELLANEOUS STAFF CONTACT: Hap Watkins,Assistant Planner (503) 718-2440 LAND USE APPLICATION f� Dateect: u+6 Zone 5DRoo onoo 7 COMPLETENESS REVIEW COMPLETE x INCOMPLETE STANDARD INFORMATION: 2- Deed/Title/Proof of Ownership Neighborhood Mtg.Affidavits,Minutes,List of Attendees Er Impact Study(18.390) USA Service Provider Letter ❑ Construction Cost Estimate ❑ Envelopes with Postage(Verify Count) ❑ #Sets Of Application Materials/Plans-"Paper Copies" [R'' Pre-Application Conference Notes ❑ #Sets Of Application Materials/Plans-"CD's" PROJECT STATISTICS: 2- Building Footprint Size ❑( %of Landscaping On Site [r %of Building Impervious Surface On Site Dr Lot Square Footage .fib-kt[S e rb v r cr e cl --hy -a t p ru vi(I Qd PLANS DIMENSIONED: g•' Building Footprint Parking Space Dimensions(Include Accessible&Bike Parking C 1 • •.• a pac- '' - •: --- ❑ Building Height Fili Access Approach and Aisle ❑ Visual Clearance Triangle Shown ADf IITIONAL PLANS: [ ' Vicinity Map [+ rchitectural Plan ❑ Tree Inventory Existing Conditions Plan g_, Landscape Plan Site Plan Lighting Plan TREE PLAN I MITIGATION PLAN: ❑ ideei+; ccc-iio.-1 ❑ rev-Itcd-; 0 El r .,-.0 Ja l ❑ r-n i-{-i CI A-fi o-, ADDITIONAL REPORTS: (list any special reports) (❑]' Pc■rlo o -i4 R1 2O(+ ❑ ❑ ❑ RESPONSE TO APPLICABLE CODE SECTIONS: ❑ 18.330(Conditional Use) 18. 30 Washington Square Regional Center) ❑ 18.775(Sensitive Lands Review) ❑ 18.340(Director's Interpretation) 18.705(Access/Egress/Circulation [g- 18.780(Signs) 18.350(PI nn d D vebomenl 18.710(Accessory Residential Units) ❑ 18,785(Temporary Use Permits) 18.360(Site Development Reviewv) El 18.710 (Density Computations) 18.790(Tree Removal) 18.370(Variances/Adjustments) ❑ 18.7 I '.n Compatibility Standards) E ' 18.795(Visual Clearance Areas) ❑ 18.380(Zoning Map/Text Amendments) NI 18.725(Environmental Performance Standards, ❑ 18.798(Wireless Communication Facilities) L 18.390(Decision Making Procedures/Impact Study) III 18.730(Exceptions To Development Standards) El 18.810(Street&Utility Improvement Standards) ❑ 18.410(Lot Line Adjustments) ❑ 18.740(Historic Overlay) ❑ 18.420(Land Partitions) III 18.742 Home Occupation Permits) __ ❑ 18.430(Subdivisions) MI 18.745(Landscaping&Screening Standards) ❑ 18.510(Residential Zoning Districts) rU 18.750(Manufactured/Mobil Home Regulations) U 18.520(Commercial Zoning Districts) 18.755(Mixed Solid Waste/Recycling Storage) ❑ 18.530(Industrial Zoning Districts) 18.760 Nonconforming Situations) ❑ 18.620(Tigard Triangle Design Standards) 18.765(Off-Street Parking/Loading Requirements ADDITIONAL ITEMS: -- Mori vt* en r■nrck t n I:1curpin\masters\forms-revised\land use application completeness review.dot REVISED. 6-Jun-07 r . . I r Y OF TIGARD Date: LAND USE APPLICATIONS ` BASIC SUBMITTAL REQUIREMENTS Project: APPLICATIONS WILL NOT BE ACCEPTED IN PARTIAL SUBMITTALS. ALL ITEMS MUST BE SUBMITTED AT ONE TIME. ➢ Include this form with submittal packet. The applicant must check the box next to the item verifying that the information is present. Staff will check off the items at intake. ➢ Three copies of all materials are required for the initial review process. The balance of the copies will be requested once your submittal is deemed complete. ➢ Each packet must be collated. ➢ Plans are required to be a minimum of 24" x 36". ➢ Plans must be FOLDED, rolled plans are not accepted. Applicant Staff Documents, Copies and Fees Required Completed Master"Land Use Permit" Application with property owner's signature or name V of agent and letter of authorization JJ Title transfer instrument or grant deed V Written summary of proposal i 1/ Narrative demonstrating compliance with all applicable development standards and approval J icriteria (as specified in the Pre- Application Conference notes) Documentary evidence of Neighborhood Meeting:Neighborhood Meeting Affidavits of � ✓ Posting&Mailing Notice,Minutes,Sign-in Sheets V ✓ Service Provider Letter (Clain tJa-kr .se/--vIc ei , ?,-d 2 b;seoz a I) V Impact Study per Section 18.390.040.B.2(e) ✓ Copy of the Pre Application Conference notes v"' Impact Fee (see fee schedule) v Preliminary Sight Distance Certification V V Preliminary Storm Calculations Arborist Report tic rein r e 0 Traffic Report(if Required) Maps or Plans (Plans must be at least 24" x 36") V Architectural Drawings (elevations &floor plans) J ✓ Existing Conditions Map I 1// Landscape Plan V Preliminary Grading/Erosion Control Plan J Preliminary Partition/Lot Line Adjustment Plan ti( . Preliminary Storm Drainage Plan Preliminary Utilities Plan V Public Improvements/Streets Plan Vr Site Development Plan Subdivision Preliminary Plat Map ✓ Topography Map . 4,/ ✓ Tree Preservation/Mitigation Plan 1,✓ Vicinity Map -feiivlilavi L; h4;,,� ➢ ce your a plication has been de mad complete you will be notified by the Planning Division in the form of a completeness letter indicating that you will need to provide the following: Two (2) sets of stamped,addressed# 10 envelopes for all owners of property within 500 feet of the subject property (the 2 sets must remain separated for the purpose of 2 mailings). Mailing envelopes shall be standard legal-size (# 10),addressed with 1" X 4" labels (please see envelope submittal requirements). Property owner mailing lists must be prepared by the City for a minimal fee (please see request for 500'property owner mailing list form). I:\CURPLN\Masters\Submittal Requirements Check List.doc (Updated:20-May-08) • I. TIGARD City of Tigard January 19,2010 Tom Lonergan HDJ Design Group, PLLC 300 W. 15th St. Vancouver,WA 98660 RE: Completeness Autozone Case File No. SDR2009-00007 Dear Mr. Lonergan: The City has received your application for Site Development Review (SDR2009-00007) to construct a new, 6,786 square-foot auto parts retail store. The development site is located at 13405 SW Pacific Highway. Staff has completed a preliminary review of the submittal materials and has determined that the following additional information is necessary before the application can be deemed complete: 1. Narrative. Please revise the narrative to address how each criterion of the following code sections is met or is not applicable. Referring the reader to plans or other submitted materials is not sufficient. You may find it easiest to copy and paste the sections into the document and respond following each criterion. Page 2 of the narrative states that there is no bus stop adjacent to the site. The applicant's Existing Conditions Plan (C2.0) shows an existing bus stop. City staff performed a site visit and verified the stop is adjacent to the site. 1,4 18.360—Site Development Review. Section 18.360.090. Vi 18.705—Access, Egress,&Circulation. 18.705.030.A-I. 18.725 —Environmental Performance Standards. Section 18.725.030. J18.745—Landscaping and Screening. ,/Section 18.745.030 ✓Section 18.745.040—see arborist's comments regarding street trees Section 18.745.050 — How will the parking, service facilities, and refuse collection areas be screened in accordance with 18.745.050.B.5 and 050.E.1, 2, & 4? Where are the service facilities located (gas meter, HVAC unit, etc.), and how will these be screened? Also see arborist's notes regarding trees in parking lots. ✓ ♦ 18.765 —Off-Street Parking and Loading. Section 18.765.040. 13125 SW Hall Blvd. • Tigard, Oregon 97223 • 503.639.4171 TTY Relay: 503.684.2772 • www.tigard-or.gov 2. Plans. V♦ Please show dimensioned bike parking areas on the Site Plan (Sheet SP1.0) that meet the standards of 18.765.050.C. ♦ Tree Plan—see arborist's comments ♦ Elevation plan for the retaining wall and decorative wall to be used for screening. I( 3. Construction Cost Estimate. Construction Cost Estimate. Please provide a cost construction estimate for all improvements. 4. Public Facility Plan Checklist: Please provide the information required by Gus Duenas, Development Review Engineer (503-718-2470), as shown on the attached Public Facility Plan completeness checklist. 5. Attached please find comments regarding street trees, tree removal/mitigation, site hydrology, and parking lot trees from the City Arborist,Todd Prager. Please provide 3 copies of each revised document. If re-submitting individual pages/sheets you will need to replace them in the existing packets previously submitted. Should you have any questions with regard to these items,please contact me at 503-718-2437. Sincerely, Cheryl Caines Associate Planner c: SDR2009-00007 Land Use File Mitch Bramlitt,AutoZone PUBLIC FACILITY PLAN Project: JR2009-00007 Autozonel COMPLETENESS CHECKLIST Date: January 19, 2010 GRADING • Existing and proposed contours shown. ® Are there grading impacts on adjacent parcels? - - ® Adjacent parcel grades shown. - ® Geotech study submitted? STREET ISSUES ❑ Right-of-way clearly shown. The narrative indicates dedication of an additional 10 feet of ROW along the frontage. The plans show existing ROW of 40 feet from centerline and a 12-foot ROW dedication to meet the requirement of 52 feet from centerline. Please correct the narrative to reflect the 12-foot ROW • to be dedicated. ® Centerline of street(s) clearly shown. ❑ Street name(s) shown. ® Existing/proposed curb or edge of pavement shown. ❑ Street profiles shown. ® Future Street Plan: Must show street profiles, topo N/A on adjacent parcel(s), etc. ❑ Traffic Impact and/or Access Report ❑ Street grades compliant? ❑ Street/ROW widths dimensioned and appropriate? ❑ Private Streets? Less than 6 lots and width appropriate? ❑ Other: SANITARY SEWER ISSUES - ® Existing/proposed lines shown. ® Stubs to adjacent parcels required/shown? WATER ISSUES ® Existing/proposed lines w/ sizes noted? ® Existing/proposed fire hydrants shown? ❑ Proposed meter location and size shown? ❑ Proposed fire protection system shown? Show fire protection system if required. If not, indicate none needed. STORM DRAINAGE AND WATER QUALITY ISSUES ® Existing/proposed lines shown? ❑ Preliminary sizing calcs for water quality/detention The existing site detained storm runoff by provided? allowing for storm water overflow into the parking lot. Regrading of the site to remove the existing detention area and ability to detain would require that an alternate detention measure be incorporated into the REVISED: 01/19/10 plans. Pleas Jordinate detention requirements with ODOT and provide the City with detention calculations or proof that detention is not required for this new facility. Merely stating that the new facility provides less runoff than the existing is not sufficient because of the elimination of the existing detention measure in the parking lot. ❑ Water quality/detention facility shown on plans? See above ❑ Area for facility match requirements from calcs? ® Facility shown outside any wetland buffer? - ❑ Storm stubs to adjacent parcels required/shown? The submittal is hereby deemed n COMPLETE ❑ INCOMPLETE By: Q P. Date: January 19, 2010 REVISED: 01/19/10 Auto Zone Completeness Item Met Not Met N/A Comments 18.360.090.A.2.a.(1) X -While it appears this criterion has been Buildings shall be met, it is difficult to determine because located to preserve the tree numbers in the arborist report existing trees... have not been transferred to the grading and tree preservation/landscape plan. Please require the applicant to transfer the arborist's inventory to the plans. 18.360.090.A.2.b X Same comment as above. Trees shall be preserved to the extent possible... 18.360.090.A.2.c X -Low impact development techniques do Innovative methods not appear to have been incorporated to reduce impacts to into the design. In reviewing this site hydrology... project with the City's engineering staff, there are a variety of methods that could be potentially be utilized to improve water quality/quantity control. Some alternatives include: 1. Planting additional large canopy trees (40' plus mature spread)to provide increased coverage over the parking lot. 2. Collecting roof runoff for use as irrigation water. 3. Redirecting runoff to landscaped flow through and/or infiltration planters. 4. Installing a green roof. 18.745.020: X Not addressed in narrative. Applicability 18.745.030: X Not addressed in narrative. General Provisions 18.745.040: X The street trees selected may cause Street Trees future conflicts with overhead utilities. They should be substituted with small stature trees that will not conflict. 18.745.050: X -There does not appear to be 1 tree for Buffering and every seven parking spaces. Additional Screening parking lot trees should be added to meet this standard. - All trees need to have sufficient soil volume to support their growth to Todd Prager City Arborist December 22, 2009 maturity. Based on the Architectural Graphic Standards, shade trees need at least 1000 cubic feet of soil volume to support growth to maturity. This is equivalent to the size of approximately 2 parking spaces assuming a soil depth of 3'. This requirement appears to have been met in most landscape areas, but if additional parking lot trees are required they will need to be provided adequate soil volumes as well. 18.745.060: X Re-vegetation 18.790.030: X -The tree numbers in the arborist report Tree Plan have not been transferred to the grading Requirement and tree preservation/landscape plan. Please require the applicant to transfer the arborist's inventory to the plans. -Trees to be preserved need to be identified on the site plan with driplines and tree protection fencing shown to scale. -Tree preservation specifications need to be included on the grading/tree preservation plan and include a signature of approval from the project arborist. -Tree protection fencing shall consist of minimum 5' metal fencing. No orange plastic fencing is allowed. -Need to address tree protection standards and methods for after construction. Specifically, they need to address acceptable landscaping practices and materials around preserved trees. This information can be shown on the grading/tree preservation and landscape plan. -The mitigation trees have not been identified on the landscape plan. Landscape trees (street trees,parking lot trees, etc.)that are otherwise required are not eligible for mitigation credit (except if they are larger than required, e.g. if planting a 3" cal.parking lot tree, will receive 1"of credit since minimum required parking lot tree is 2" cal. Todd Prager City Arborist December 22, 2009 • inches). Please have the applicant provide a clear accounting of required mitigation inches and how the mitigation plan meets the replacement guidelines in 18.790.060D. -The project arborist will need to sign off that the mitigation plan meets the replacement guideline of 18.790.060.D of the TDC. 18.790.050: X Permit Applicability Todd Prager City Arborist December 22, 2009 , . ` J J a RECEIVED DESIGN GROUP FEB 0 4 2010 CITY OF TIGARD PLANNIKITENGINEEPIING Memorandum To: Cheryl Caines,Associate Planner CC: Tom Lonergan,PE,Project Managr From: Amy Wooten,Land Use Plann Date: 01/29/2010 Re: AutoZone(SDR2009-00007) Below,please find my response to your letter of request for additional items needed for the above noted application. Narrative: 0 Page 2 of the narrative states that there is no bus stop adjacent to the site. The applicant's Existing Conditions plan(C2.0)shows an existing bus stop. City staff performed a site visit and verified the stop is adjacent to the site. /The requested correction has been made and is demarcated with an underline on page 2 of the narrative. i 18.360—Site Development Review. Section 18.360.090. y pproval Criteria established in Section 18.360.090 have been addressed and are underlined on page 3 of the enclosed narrative. 0 18.705—Access,Egress,&Circulation. 18.703.030.A—I. Approval Criteria related to access has been addressed and on page underlines as requested in Section 18.360.090 have been addressed and are underlined on page 3 of the enclosed narrative. Regarding the access easements, descriptions were included in the Warranty Deed(see page 2&3 of 6)submitted with the original application packet. In addition,provided herein is a supplemental preliminary title report is provided with the following attachments:Fee No. 88003147 and Fee No. 88003148. These exceptions contain the easement agreements of record engineers I landscape architects I planners I surveyors 16760 SW Upper Boones Ferry Rd.-Ste 103 - Portland,OR 97224-7696 - 503/924-4005 - 503/924-4366 fax 21 18.725—Environmental Performance Standards v Approval Criteria related to environmental performance standards have been addressed as requested and are underlined on page 5 of the enclosed narrative. 0 18.745—Landscaping and Screening. ✓ All criteria contained in section 18.745.030, 18.745.040 and 18.745.050 have been addressed and are underlined on pages 6 and 7 of the revised narrative. D 18.765—Off-Street Parking and Loading. Section 18.765.040. All criteria contained in section 18.765.040 have been addressed and are underlined on page 8 of the revised narrative. 2. Plans v✓ A dimensioned bike parking area is shown on the site plan as requested. ✓ The tree plan has been updated to reflect the arborists comments as requested. ✓ Elevations for the proposed enclosure screening have been added,please refer to sheet L1.0 of the preliminary plan set. El Construction Cost Estimate. v The Estimate for the site related costs is$230,000 and the estimated building construction cost is$425,000 for a total project cost estimate of$655,000. 21 Public Facility Plan Checklist All of the below mentions narrative corrections have been underlined and can be found on page 10 of the revised narrative. Street Issues: the narrative has been corrected to reflect the 12 foot Right-of-Way dedication and is underlined Water Issues: The narrative has been corrected to state that a fire protection system is not required and that none is needed for this project. Storm Drainage and Water Quality issues: the narrative has been corrected to reflect that detention will be addressed in the same manner as before, with detention within the parking area. The detention calculations were provided to the City as part of the preliminary drainage report. u :it; 0 Attached comments regarding street trees,tree removal/mitigation, site hydrology,and parking lot trees from the City Arborist, Todd Prager. Design comments have been incorporated to the preliminary plans as requested. Please refer to revised plans. OSEPH TY TREE SPECIALIST February 3,2010 CERTIFIED ARBORIST HDJ Design Group,PLLC Andy Nuttrock 300 W. 15th Street PROVIDING Vancouver,WA 98660 KNOWLEDGEABLE Re: Tree Evaluation CARE FOR TREES 13405 SW Pacific Hwy Tigard,OR 97223 IN THE URBAN ENVIRONMENT Dear Andy, I have reviewed the site/mitigation plan.It all seems to be in accordance with proper tree preservation protocol. If you have any questions please feel free to call. Sincerely, Joseph Harrity C feed Arborist PkW/ISA#0148 PO Box 12395 PORTLAND, OREGON 97212 RE ( EI \/ ED (503)331-0452 FAX 282-6179 FEB • U A 2010 arbor @teleport.com CD 'k U www.harritytrees.com HDJ UESIGN GROUP MEMBER ISA at 1•tAA,a, CCB#84426 IFIDj Letter of Transmittal DESIGN GROUP r.,i�,I ww,,c•,rnn.<,.I a,M.I H,ti HDJ Design Group, PLLC Date: Job# 15th arc3utects I Planners I Surveyors 02/04/2010 3050-00 300 W 15 Street R .,LIVLI EAttention: Vancouver, WA 98660 Cheryl Caines 360/695-3488 0 4 20�Q Re: 360/695-8767 fax FEB AutoZone Store#3756 CITY OF TIGARD SDR2009-00007 TO: City of Tigard PLANNING/ENGINEERING Community Development Department 13125 SW Hall Blvd. Tigard, OR 97223 DOCUMENT(S) SENT: ® Attached ❑Under separate cover via the following items: ['Shop Drawings ❑Prints ❑ Plans ❑ Samples ['Specifications ❑ Copy of letter ['Change order ['Other Copies Date No. Description 3 sets Revised drawings and narrative TRANSMITTED FOR: ❑ For approval ❑ Approved as submitted LI Resubmit copies for approval ® For your use ❑ Approved as noted ❑ Submit copies for distribution ❑ As requested [' Returned for corrections ❑ Return corrected prints [' For review/comment ❑ Prints Returned After Loan to HD1 [' For Bids Due ❑ Other: REMARKS: Copy to: Signed: Auto Zone, 2"d Round Completeness Completeness Item Met Not Met _ N/A Comments 18.360.090.A.2.a.(1) X Buildings shall be located to preserve existing trees... 18.360.090.A.2.b X Trees shall be preserved to the extent possible... 18.360.090.A.2.c X -Large canopy trees have been selected Innovative methods to provide canopy cover and stormwater to reduce impacts to mitigation for the parking lot. site hydrology... 18.745.020: X Applicability 18.745.030: X General Provisions 18.745.040: X Street Trees 18.745.050: X -There does not appear to be 1 tree for Buffering and every seven parking spaces. Additional Screening parking lot trees should be added to meet this standard. - All trees need to have sufficient soil volume to support their growth to maturity. Based on the Architectural Graphic Standards, shade trees need at least 1000 cubic feet of soil volume to support growth to maturity. This is equivalent to the size of approximately 2 parking spaces assuming a soil depth of 3'. This requirement appears to have been met in most landscape areas,but if additional parking lot trees are required they will need to be provided adequate soil volumes as well. 18.745.060: X Re-vegetation 18.790.030: X Tree Plan Requirement 18.790.050: X Todd Prager City Arborist February 17, 2010 Permit Applicability Todd Prager City Arborist February 17, 2010 City of Tigard, Oregon • 13125 SW Hall Blvd. • Tiga,u, OR 97223 11111 February 24, 2010 T I GARD HDJ Design Group. PLLC Tom Lonergan 300 W. 15th Street Vancouver,WA 98660 RE: Completeness AutoZone Case File No. SDR2009-00007 Dear Mr.Lonergan, The City has received your response to the completeness review letter dated January 19,2010 and review of the submitted material has been completed. Staff has determined that the following additional information is necessary before the application can be deemed complete: 1. Screening of the gas meter from the customer parking area is required per 18.745.050.E.2. Provide a revised sheet to the landscaping plan which shows the location and screening. STAFF CONTACT: Hap Watkins, 503-718-2440. 2. Respond to the enclosed comments from the City Development Engineer. STAFF CONTACT: Gus Duenas, 503-718-2470. 3. Respond to the enclosed comments from the City Arborist. I have met with Todd Prager,and we recognize that placement of one tree every 7 parking spaces will result in the loss of parking spaces. We would accept either increasing the caliper of two TZS trees at each end of the east face of the building from 2"to 3" or one additional TKP tree in the northeast corner of the site to provide additional canopy cover. Provide a revised sheet(as in #1 above) to the landscaping plan which shows your choice. STAFF CONTACT: Hap Watkins, 503-718-2440. Please provide 3 copies of each revised document. Should you have any questions with regard to these items,contact me at 503-718-2440. Sincerely, Darrel"Hap"Watkins Assistant Planner C: SDR2009-00007 Land Use File Mitch Bramlitt,AutoZone End: 2 Completeness Checklists,City Arborist and Development Engineer SDR2009-00007 2nd AutoZone Completeness Letter 042410 Phone: 503.639.4171 • Fax: 503.684.7297 • www.tigard-or.gov • TTY Relay: 503.684.2772 PUBLIC FACILITY PLAN Project: )R2009-00007 Autozone COMPLETENESS CHECKLIST Date: February 22, 2010 GRADING ® Existing and proposed contours shown. ® Are there grading impacts on adjacent parcels? ® Adjacent parcel grades shown. Geotech study submitted? STREET ISSUES ❑ Right-of-way clearly shown. I SW Pacific Hghway is a 5-lane facility and requires 52 feet from centerline of ROW for its ultimate section. Dedication of property sufficient to provide 52 feet from centerline of ROW on Highway 99W is required. The additional ROW to be dedicated to meet this standard is presumably 12 feet based on the drawings submitted. 2. A 10-foot wide sidewalk with planter strip and street trees are required. The narrative does not mention the planter strip. ® Centerline of street(s) clearly shown. ❑ Street name(s) shown. ® Existing/proposed curb or edge of pavement shown. ❑ Street profiles shown. • ® Future Street Plan: Must show street profiles, topo N/A on adjacent parcel(s), etc. ❑ Traffic Impact and/or Access Report ❑ Street grades compliant? ❑ Street/ROW widths dimensioned and appropriate? ❑ Private Streets? Less than 6 lots and width appropriate? ❑ Other: SANITARY SEWER ISSUES ® Existing/proposed lines shown. ® Stubs to adjacent parcels required/shown? WATER ISSUES ® Existing/proposed lines w/ sizes noted? ® Existing/proposed fire hydrants shown? ® Proposed meter location and size shown? ® Proposed fire protection system shown? None proposed or required STORM DRAINAGE AND WATER QUALITY ISSUES ® Existing/proposed lines shown? ❑ Preliminary sizing calcs for water quality/detention The narrative and calculations indicate that provided? the existing parking lot will be used for detention. However, based on the contours REVISED: 02/23/10 for the park lot final grade, we do not see how the parking lot can retain storm runoff as stated. In addition, water quality treatment looks questionable considering the relative elevations of the various structures and the depth requirement for storm water filter vaults. Show how the plans and relative elevations correspond to the calculations provided with sufficient proof that there is positive flow towards the ODOT system on Highway 99W. Finally, the water quality treatment facility appears to treat only a fraction of the site and not the entire area. Why is that? ❑ Water quality/detention facility shown on plans? Plans don't appear to correspond to the calculations submitted. See above. ❑ Area for facility match requirements from calcs? Apparent discrepancies noted between calcs and plans. Water quality facility does not treat the entire site. _ ® Facility shown outside any wetland buffer? _ ❑ Storm stubs to adjacent parcels required/shown? The submittal is hereby deemed COMPLETE ® INCOMPLETE By: it, } Date: February 22, 2010 REVISED: 02/23/10 RECEIVED DESIGN GROUP MAR 0 3 2010 CITY OF TIGARD PLANNING/ENGINEERING March 3, 2010 City of Tigard, Oregon Darrel "Hap" Watkins 13125 SW Hall Blvd. Tigard, OR 97223 RE: Completeness AutoZone Case File No. SDR2009-00007 Dear Mr. Watkins, Within this letter and the attached information are our responses to the items you requested for this application to be deemed complete: 1 . Landscape plan has been revised to provide screening of the gas meter from the customer parking area. Please see attached. 2. Street Issues: The narrative has been revised to include the description of the right-of-way dedication with landscape strip, the dimension of present right-of-way and the proposed right-of-way and the placement of improvement within the frontage. Storm Drainage and Water Quality Issues: We have rechecked the detention storage volume calculations and verified that those volumes calculated and presented in the stormwater report are correct as submitted. The invert elevation for the existing ODOT system outlet pipe and elevations of proposed catch basins were not included on plan sheet C5.0. This sheet has been revised with these elevations (4.8 foot differential) to show sufficient proof that there is positive flow towards the outlet and the detail of the "Contech Stormwater Solutions" deep steel catch basin stormfilter, 4 Cartridge unit (3' 3 5/8" drop). Please see attached. The plan shows all storm runoff from the driving surfaces through one stormfilter catch basin. The southwest parking area just has a catch basin but it connects to the storm filter unit for treatment. This is more cost effective than constructing 2 separate units. The storm calculations presented in the report are a correct representation of the plan as submitted. engineers I landscape architects I planners I surveyors 300 W 15th Street - Vancouver, WA 98660 - 360/695-3488 - 360/695-8767 fax HDJDESIGN GROUP 3. Two TZS trees have been increased in Caliper inch size to meet the required parking lot tree standard. Please see attached landscape plan. The three required copies of the required document have been included with this submission. Please contact us if you need any additional information. .\0 PROFESS Thank You, 4, 04��GiNFF9 �p ‘\)j 4X. 48087 OREGON •,y48• 3 L014`f Thomas G. Lonergan, P.E. I EXPIRES: 12/31/, 0/01 Project Engineer Encl: 3 copies Landscape plan 3 copies Street &Storm Plan 3 copies "Contech Stormfilter" detail. engineers I landscape architects I planners I surveyors 300 W 15th Street - Vancouver, WA 98660 - 360/695-3488 - 360/695-8767 fax r; 6 RECEIVED MAR 0 3 2010 CITY OF TIGARD Streets PLANNIK' ./E1'1GINEERING The subject site currently has frontage on SW Pacific Highway (a 4-lane major arterial) with a half width right-of-way of 40 feet. The SW Pacific Highway frontage currently is improved and has a full access signalized driveway to the proposed site and the parcel to the south. There is also a full access driveway to the proposed site on the north. This project proposes dedicate 12 feet of additional right-of-way across the frontage, making the half width right-of-way width 52 feet, and construct a 10-foot wide detached sidewalk with a 7.5 foot wide planter strip across the frontage. The back of the sidewalk will be placed 1/2 foot inside the new right-of-way boundary. All site access will be achieved via two driveways off of SW Pacific Highway. No other improvements are proposed or required for SW Pacific Highway. Sewer Availability Clean Water Services is the sanitary sewer purveyor for the site. There is existing 6-inch sewer lateral serving the existing structure.A connection to the existing lateral is proposed. Stormwater Drainage Oregon Department of Transportation(ODOT)will be the lead agency for review and approval of the development's stormwater system. Currently, the subject site is developed, with paved parking and drives that send stormwater runoff draining to a conveyance system located within SW Pacific Highway. The new storm system will provide treatment for all stormwater runoff generated on new driving and parking surfaces by the proposed commercial development. The redeveloped site will utilize the parking area for detention of runoff to match the existing conditions. The existing control structure for releasing storm runoff will remain in place and be utilized to control detention for the proposed project. A preliminary drainage report has been provided as part of this application and contains the detention and water quality calculations. Prior to construction,a stormwater control plan prepared by a licensed engineer will be submitted to the ODOT for approval. The stormwater plan will make use of the Best Management Practices (BMPs) as identified by the ODOT and Clean Water Services. Measures to reduce or control surface water runoff and runoff water impacts include on-site stormwater collection, conveyance, treatment and detention. Water Availability The City of Tigard is the water purveyor for the site. The subject site currently has a 2" water service lateral and meter. There is an existing fire hydrant on the north access drive to the site. The proposed redevelopment occupancy is not be required to have a fire suppression system and none is being proposed. The new building will utilize the existing 2-inch water service that is located in front of the structure within the right-of-way. Project Impacts Analysis Transportation Impacts to the City's transportation system will be minimal. The `Rate Calculation Worksheet' prepared by City Staff has assigned ITE use codes for the prior use (933 —Fast Food Restaurant w/o drive-through)and proposed use(843 —Auto Parts Sales),which will result in an overall trip reduction of approximately 2,430 daily trips. AutoZone Store No.5658 10 PRE2009-00029 B CI• WV v OUTLET STUB (SEE NOTES 445) . WEIR WALL —!O• G. •. - —1. r.7 OVERLAP ee • I�1 /11■ iiii�■ ■iiri �il� 1�� • — /b:\1\,�k- h., ��j;11%1��%�� '�' A •' • \t ■�i,�/lN ��N' ,APP i��1vre $? : 4" 1 ".• \�,∎,,'.. \i%e 11 a ?'N', F(TYP) lii 1 r1 1`1 1 1 0 '� ••• SCUM BAFFLE , • 'I REINFORCING BARS INLET STUB (SEE NOTE 6) (OPTIONAL) (SEE NOTES 445) 4-CARTRIDGE CATCHBASIN - PLAN VIEW 40 INLET GRATE ACCESS COVER L f �( r2 I/2" 6 "•' OUTLET STUB 4"0//OPENING 1 N.. I-I'- (SEE NOTES 445) (TYP) CONCRETE COLLAR i*l ^I iii iai (SEE NOTE 6) jIIjI ,) I A I\ 11 i\i STORMFILTER 0 i �.,,, ..., CARTRIDGE(TYP) ni i�'ir111011iri�iu■ rari11•11•uS.∎Iiiw�kl (SEE NOTE 2) CLEANOUT ACCESS PLUG ON WEIR WALL UNDERDRAIN MANIFOLD 3'-8" I 2'-8" I S'-5' INSIDE INSIDE INSIDE I CY I' OUTSIDE 4-CARTRIDGE CATCHBASIN - SECTION VIEW A 1 THE STORMWATER MANAGEMENT StormRlter® U.S.PATENT No.5.322,G29. No.5.707.527,No.6,027.639 No.6,649,048,No.5,624.576, AND OTHER U.S.AND FOREIGN ©2006 CONTECH Stormwater Solutions PATENTS PENDING A 11■ITCALI® DEEP STEEL CATCHBASIN STORMFILTER DRAWING 11-10%iff li i EU!-! STORMWATER PLAN AND SECTION VIEWS 1 SOLUTIONSti STANDARD DETAIL - 4 CARTRIDGE UNIT contechetorrnwater.com DATE:11101/05 I SCALE:NONE I FILE NAME:CBSF4•SD-DTL I DRAWN:MJW I CHECKED:ARG PERMANENT POOL ELEVATION 4"0 OPENING It • I'-5 1/4" 2' VARIES 3'-3 5/5"MAX. + O 3'-3 5/5" • INLET STUB (OPTIONAL) 2' OUTLET STUB (5EE NOTES 4*5) INSIDE (SEE NOTES 4*5) 2'-O I/2" 2"0 OUTLET PIPE OUTSIDE yl FROM UNDERDRAIN 4-CARTRIDGE CATCHBASIN - SECTION VIEW B 2 LIFTING EYE i ---- (TYP OF 4) I iiii 4''9" \ PERMANENT I�l k ( POOL ELEVATION is riar .CARTRIDGE i l- ) SUPPORT + r 4-CARTRIDGE CATCH BASIN - SECTION VIEW Q THE STORMWATER MANAGEMENT 5tormrlter® U.S.PATENT No.5,322,629. No.5.707.527.No.6,027,639 No.6,649,048,No.5,624,576, AND OTHER U.S.AND FOREIGN 02006 CONTECH Stormwater Solutions PATENTS PENDING AaIJITCAL!® DEEP STEEL CATCHBASIN STORMFILTER DRAWING 11■TVAlle.rill i /AM STORMWATER SECTION VIEWS 2 SOLUTIONSK STANDARD DETAIL - 4 CARTRIDGE UNIT contechstormwater.com DATE:11/01/05 SCALE:NONE I FILE NAME:CBSF4SD-DTL IDRAWN:MJW ICHECKED:ARG GENERAL NOTES I)STORMFILTER BY CONTECH STORMWATER SOLUTIONS; PORTLAND, OR(800) 548-4667;SCARBOROUGH,ME(877)907-8676; ELKRIDGE, MD(866)740-3318. 2)FILTERS TO BE SIPHON-ACTUATED AND SELF-CLEANING. 3)STEEL STRUCTURE TO BE MANUFACTURED OF 1/4 INCH STEEL PLATE. 4)STORMFILTER REQUIRES 3.3 FEET OF DROP FROM RIM TO OUTLET. INLET SHOULD NOT BE LOWER THAN OUTLET. INLET(IF APPLICABLE)AND OUTLET PIPING TO BE SPECIFIED BY ENGINEER AND PROVIDED BY CONTRACTOR. 5)CBSF EQUIPPED WITH 4 INCH(APPROXIMATE) LONG STUBS FOR INLET(IF APPLICABLE)AND OUTLET PIPING. STANDARD OUTLET STUB IS 8 INCHES IN DIAMETER. MAXIMUM OUTLET STUB 15 15 INCHES IN DIAMETER. CONNECTION TO COLLECTION PIPING CAN BE MADE USING FLEXIBLE COUPLING BY CONTRACTOR. G) FOR H-20 LOAD RATING, CONCRETE COLLAR IS REQUIRED. CONCRETE COLLAR WITH QUANTITY(2)#4 REINFORCING BARS TO BE PROVIDED BY CONTRACTOR. 7)ALL STORMFILTERS REQUIRE REGULAR MAINTENANCE. REFER TO OPERATION AND MAINTENANCE GUIDELINES FOR MORE INFORMATION. 4-CARTRIDGE DEEP CATCHBASIN STORMFILTER DATA STRUCTURE ID XXX WATER QUALITY FLOW RATE(cfs) X.XX PEAK FLOW RATE (<I.8 cfs) X.XX RETURN PERIOD OF PEAK FLOW(yrs) XXX CARTRIDGE FLOW RATE(I 5 OR 7.5 qpm) XX MEDIA TYPE(CSF, PERLITE,ZPG) XXXXX RIM ELEVATION XXX.XX' PIPE DATA I.E. DIAMETER INLET STUB XXX.XX' XX" OUTLET STUB XXX.XX' XX" CONFIGURATION OUTLET 001 001 SLOPED LID YES\NO SOLID COVER YES\NO NOTES/SPECIAL REQUIREMENTS: ACCESS COVER ( ) INLET GRATE t••":-a. . 1. .:r • •• ♦.....�..... +�•� •�M ♦.....2.....4 • U. ........., V........... � r. ........., r►........... � • ' o♦i♦i♦••i♦•�•�•�•�•�i�•�'� 1 „ i.�.�.�O.�.0�0000.!'i •• INSIDE RIM i►......■• ...• n.■.......... 4' 2'-4" 4 �—INSIDE RIM INSIDE RIM INSIDE RIM 10-5" OUTSIDE RIM THE STORMWATER MANAGEMENT 4-CARTRIDGE CATCHBASIN - TOP VIEW ( , Sto�,P,lter® I. 1 U.5.PATENT No.5,322,629, No.5,707,527,No.6,027,639 No.6,649,048,No.5,624,576, AND OTHER U.5.AND FOREIGN ©2006 CONTECH Stormwater Solutions PATENTS PENDING A 1.ITCALI? DEEP STEEL CATCHBASIN STORMFILTER DRAWING �� ` �vg ^ TOP VIEW, NOTES AND DATA 3 STORMWATER STANDARD DETAIL - 4 CARTRIDGE UNIT SOLUTIONS w 3/3 ccn:ec—storrwa:er.com DATE:11/01/05 I SCALE:NONE I FILE NAME:CBEF4SD-DTL I DRAWN:MJW I CHECKED:ARG Infiltration Configuration Dry Well StormFilter The Dry Well StormFilter provides treatment, infiltration and 0111% groundwater protection in a single structure.The system is designed to treat conveyed flow or sheet flow from small drainages. Multiple units can be installed to treat any size site. Because it provides treatment and infiltration in a single unit,the total number of structures and the amount of pipe required for the stormwater system are reduced. 0443 The Dry Well StormFilter system is available in 48", 60"and 72-" pre-cast manhole top sections that are designed to be stacked on top of dry well infiltration risers. The StormFilter portion of the unit arrives fully assembled and ready to install, including an integrated concrete deck for the StormFilter cartridges. The system can also be retrofitted into existing 48" I manhole dry wells. . Basic Operation Stormwater enters the dry well unit through one or more entry pipes or channels at its top. It then percolates through the media in the StormFilter cartridge to the center tube. Treated water in the cartridge center tube is discharged to the infiltration section below,and then infiltrates into the surrounding soils through a number of small exit openings at / — the sides and bottom. Roof Runoff Treatment r Configuration Downspout StormFilter The Downspout StormFilter is an aboveground configuration that can be easily integrated into existing gutter systems to DryWell StormFilter eliminate pollution from rooftop runoff. It typically occupies 2.5'x 5'footprint,and can fit most downspout configurations and sizes. Each unit holds two StormFilter cartridges,and single-and dual-stage options are available. It treats up to 14,000 square feet of rooftop area per dual-cartridge system. StormFilter Cartridges There are three cartridge heights available for StormFilter systems:27", 18",and Low Drop.The most economical is Cartridge Flow Rates the 27"tall cartridge. It can treat the highest flow rate per Cartridge Hydraulic Treatment cartridge,which creates the smallest system with the lowest Type Drop Capacity(gpm) installed cost.The 27" cartridge requires 3.05'of driving head 1 gpm/ft2 2 gpm/ft2 to operate.For sites with less driving head available,the 18" StormFilter 27" 3.05' 11.25 22.5 cartridge is the next best option. Lower flow rates per cartridge increase the footprint of the overall system but only 2.3'of StormFilter 18" 2.30' 7.5 15 driving head is required. For sites with very limited drop,the StormFilter Low Drop 1.80' 5 10 Low Drop cartridge only requires 1.8"of driving head. 10 City of Tigard, Oregon - 13125 SW Hall Blvd. • Tiga> OR 97223 1,1 a March 4,2010 • T I GARD HDJ Design Group,PLLC Tom Lonergan 300 W. 15`11 Street Vancouver,WA 98660 RE: Completeness AutoZone Case File No. SDR2009-00007 Dear Mr. Lonergan, The City received your supplemental application materials March 3,2010 for Site Development Review Approval to construct a new retail sales building at 13405 SW Pacific Highway. Staff has completed review of the revised submittal and has determined the application will be complete when the comment review copies are submitted with the mailing envelopes.At that time the 120 day review period for local decisions will commence. It should be noted that staff has not reviewed the application submittal for compliance with all the relevant code criteria, and that additional issues may arise during the review which may require further clarification. Provide 11 (full set) copies of your revised collated application materials and one additional copy of your reduced plan sets at 8 1/2 X 11 inches for our records.Also include a CD copy of all application materials. Also provide two sets of pre-addressed (no return address),stamped(not metered) #10 size plain white envelopes. Contact Patty Lunsford at 503-718-2438 for address labels of property owners located within 500 feet of the subject site. Should you have questions,please call me at 503-718-2440 or e-mail me at hapatigard-or.gov. Sincerely, (11iJ Darrel"Hap'!■ atkins Assistant Planner C: SDR2009-00007 Land Use File Mitch Bramlitt Phone: 503.639.4171 • Fax: 503.684.7297 • www.tigard-or.gov • TTY Relay: 503.684.2772 PUBLIC FACILITY PLAN Project: )R2009-00007 Autozone COMPLETENESS CHECKLIST Date: March 4, 2010 GRADING ® Existing and proposed contours shown. ® Are there grading impacts on adjacent parcels? ® Adjacent parcel grades shown. ® Geotech study submitted? STREET ISSUES ® Right-of-way clearly shown. ® Centerline of street(s) clearly shown. ❑ Street name(s) shown. ® Existing/proposed curb or edge of pavement shown. ❑ Street profiles shown. ® Future Street Plan: Must show street profiles, topo N/A on adjacent parcel(s), etc. ❑ Traffic Impact and/or Access Report ❑ Street grades compliant? ❑ Street/ROW widths dimensioned and appropriate? ❑ Private Streets? Less than 6 lots and width appropriate? ❑ Other: SANITARY SEWER ISSUES ® Existing/proposed lines shown. ® Stubs to adjacent parcels required/shown? WATER ISSUES ® , Existing/proposed lines w/ sizes noted? ® Existing/proposed fire hydrants shown? ® Proposed meter location and size shown? ® Proposed fire protection system shown? None proposed or required STORM DRAINAGE AND WATER QUALITY ISSUES ® Existing/proposed lines shown? ® Preliminary sizing calcs for water quality/detention provided? ® Water quality/detention facility shown on plans? ® Area for facility match requirements from calcs? ® Facility shown outside any wetland buffer? ❑ Storm stubs to adjacent parcels required/shown? The submittal is hereby deemed ® COMPLETE ❑ INCOMPLETE By: • Date: March 4, 2010 REVISED: 03/04/10 Hap Watkins From: Hap Watkins Sent: Tuesday, March 09, 2010 8:18 AM To: 'mitch.bramlitt @autozone.com' Subject: RE: Autozone- SDR2009-00007 Mitch; The 120 day period is the maximum for the City to review your application, including appeals if made. The normal events are: 1) Your application packages are sent out for review by other departments and jurisdictions with interest in your project and they are requested to reply within a two week comment period. A notice of pending land use decision is also mailed to all property owners within a 500 ft radius of the property, 2) the property is posted for public notice of pending land use decision during that same two week period, 3) Comments are gathered and the decision is written by staff which takes perhaps another week, 4) After the decision is written, there is another notice of decision mailed to all parties within a 500 ft radius with a two week appeal period, and 5) If there is no appeal, the decision becomes final the day after the appeal period expires. In a perfect world, it takes 5 weeks after your submittal of complete application packets after which you can submit building plans for building permit(s). That is 35-40 days, much less that the maximum allowed (the 120 days provides for appeal). We have a good application that is complete for review and I see no particular hang ups. There might, however, be some comments from Tri-Met about the timing of construction and temporary bus stop location. I think our Development Engineer covered everything from the ODOT perspective. There is no faster track for this review given the notice period, writing the decision, and the appeal period. From mitch.bramlitt @autozone.com [mailto:mitch.bramlitt @autozone.com] Sent: Monday, March 08, 2010 2:25 PM To: Hap Watkins Subject: Autozone - SDR2009-00007 Mr. Watkins, I am in receipt of the Letter of Completeness for this new AutoZone Store and we will be submitting the package requested this week to start the 120 day comment period. My consulting Engineer just informed me that we could not proceed forward with Permit review until the 120 day was complete. We are under an extremely tight time frame to Commit to this deal with the Landlord due to the length of the review process thus far. We started this process back in late September of 09 and have approximately 5 months of invested time getting to a "preliminary site plan". Is there any way that we can pay additional fees to have this project reviewed by the building department and engineering departments so that we can get the technical aspects of this project nailed down while the 120 day review period is proceeding ?We need to be able to come to a point very soon to where we know what the cost impacts are going to be so that we can make some financial decisions on whether or not to ask for Extensions to the RE contract. It will be impossible to do that without review comments from Engineering and building departments. We understand that we would be proceeding at risk and if any comments came out of the 120 period we may be back to square one. I would appreciate it if you could consider this request or direct me to the person that could make that decision. Thank you much for your time and patience. Thanks Mitch Bramlitt AutoZone Store Development 123 South Front Dept. 8320 901-495-8714 fax 901-495-8991 Customers 1st ADDITIONAL DOCUMENTS a►P22.e°g- 7 RECEIVED ED MAY 2 5 2010 CITY OF TIGARD P* R * ' * D * E PLANNING/ENGINEERING DISPOSAL COMPANY P.O. Box 820 Sherwood, OR 97140 Phone: (503) 625-6177 Fax: (503) 625-6179 May 18, 2010 Scott W Gilliland, P.E I Civil Engineer HDJ Design Ground Group,PLLC. 300 W 15 St. Vancouver, WA 98660-2927 RE: Autozone Store No.3756, 13405 SW Pacific Hwy,Tigard We have reviewed the site plans for the Autozone Store.The site plan shows an enclosure on the East end of the property which will allow our drivers to get straight on access,which is necessary for us to be able to access the containers. The measurements on the enclosure appear to be 18' by 11.3'. The enclosure must be at least 10' deep by 20' wide(inside dimensions). There should be no center post at access point. The gate opening must be no less than 20' wide. There must be full swing gates that open at least 120 degrees. The gate placement must be in front of,not inside the walls to allow for the full 20' required. The gate also needs cane bolts and holes put in place so the gates can be held in the open and closed position. If you choose to have an overhead, we require at least 25'of overhead clearance. Feel free to contact me with any questions you might have. Sincerely, • 1(11 LOW1601/173 Kelsey Williams Pride Disposal Company 501.625.6177 *105 Kelsev■ 'aipridedisposal.com f 2 2 9 -‘).7 t 5 1)? 7 4Z 2 ,e_ e4i/ hI HYDRANT FLOW REQUEST FORM PROJECT: c 5-1.-‹_c..1 ar,c ADDRESS: r', i LS • v CROSS STREET: HYDRANT LOCATION: PO `aG STATIC: RESIDUAL: L GPM: 1I 1`o DATED: C> CQ • k6 • ) 3 "r a*r`( HYDRANT LOCATION: CGS}w ;a, it r> 7 ?' _• 'E' Po Pax STATIC: 5 RESIDUAL: 1 GPM: DATED: 0C. , R. - E a Wager QwidbINq►Cum 80 70---- 60--- + 50 zn 40 30_ -. t. a t t 20---- 10 500 1000 1500 2000 2500 3000 3500 4000 4500 5000 ) ■Static=75 psi. Flow(GPM •System demand=20.00 psi with 4988.0 gpm flowing. •Residual=70 psi at a flow of 1360 gpm. Pressure available=20.06 psi when 4988.0 gpm is flowir Demand Is below curve by 0.80 psi (0.30%). Albert Shields From: Albert Shields c=y•JR 2 ce). - 0600 Sent: Tuesday, August 24, 2010 1 :1 0 PM To: Bramlitt, Mitch Cc: 'Gilliland, Scott W.'; Hap Watkins; Gus Duenas Subject: FW: Autozone, SDR2009-00007 Attachments: Albert Shields.vcf Mitch, your payment of$1,125 for the Tree Mitigation Fee has been received and a receipt is in the mail to you. I've signed off that Condition of Approval. Re other Planning Conditions, two remain, revised plans/bus stop and revised landscape plan/trees and bus stop. On both of those we are waiting for hard copies of signed final plans approved by both ODOT and TriMet. The ODOT and TriMet approvals can be confirmed either by their signatures on the plans or by email from them referencing the plans and the plan date. Re Engineering Conditions the same comment applies: we're waiting for the same signed and approved plans. There is also an Engineering Condition requiring dedication to ODOT of right-of-way along SW Pacific Hwy/Rt.99 but I do not know the status of work on that dedication. I simply know that we have received no confirmation that it has been accomplished to ODOT's satisfaction. Please let me know if you have any other questions. Albert Shields IIIII City of Tigard I Permits/Projects Coordinator i 1`1A K II) Albert`¢5gard-or.go i I (503)713-2426 .'ork (503)524-3531=ax 13125 5',`J Hall Blvd. Tigard, OR 97223 From: Gus Duenas Sent: Tuesday, August 24, 2010 11:34 AM To: Albert Shields; Mike White Subject: RE: Autozone, SDR2009-00007 We have not yet seen the final plans signed by ODOT. We need to stamp them approved and return the plans so that copies can be made and distributed. Gus From: Albert Shields Sent: Tuesday, August 24, 2010 11:21 AM To: Gus Duenas; Mike White Subject: Autozone, SDR2009-00007 Am I right that you guys are still waiting to receive engineering plans signed by ODOT? Albert. 1 • Autozone, Inc. • 123 South Front Street. Memphis,TN 38103 • Dept. 8320 AUTOZONE, INC - ono August 23, 2010 RECEIVED AUG 2 4 2010 Mr. Albert Shields Permits/Projects Coordinator CITY OF TIGARD 13125 SW Hall Blvd. PLANNING/ENGINEERING Tigard, OR. 97223 503-718-2426 RE: AUTOZONE FACILITY: 13405 S.W. Pacific Hwy-Tigard, OR. Mr. Shields Please find enclosed a check for$1,125 for the Tree Mitigation Fee per Item#9 of the Planning Conditions. Please let me know if you need anything further with regards to Planning signoffs. Sincerely, Ali ,� I• Mitch Bramlitt Assistant Design Manager (800)285-2223 ext 8714 fax 901-495-8991 Mitch.Bramlitt @AutoZone.com The Best Parts at the Right Price • CITY OF TIGARD RECEIPT S C 13125 SW Hall Blvd.,Tigard OR 97223 503.639.4171 TIGARD Receipt Number: 179181 - 08/24/2010 CASE NO. FEE DESCRIPTION REVENUE ACCOUNT NUMBER PAID SDR2009-00007 Tree Replacement 1003100-48101 $1,125.00 Total: $1,125.00 PAYMENT METHOD CHECK# CC AUTH.CODE ACCT ID CASHIER ID RECEIPT DATE RECEIPT AMT Check 7021b3 STREAT 08/24/2010 $1,125.00 Payor: AW[O 3ott / Total Payments: $1,125.00 Balance Due: $0.00 Page 1 of 1 " Hap Watkins From: Gilliland, Scott W. [gillilands @hdjdg.com] Sent: Wednesday, August 25, 2010 10:32 AM To: Albert Shields Cc: Bramlitt, Mitch; Hap Watkins Subject: FW: FW: AutoZone on Pacific highway bus stop Hi Albert, As you can see below, Ben with Tri-Met is OK with our plans for the AutoZone project. Please let me know if you need something in addition to this from Tri-Met. Scott W Gilliland, P.E. HDJ DESIGN GROUP, PLLC 360/695-3488 ext. 2134 gillilandsPhdidg.com /MI ../.111■ Asak 0/Mk- From: Baldwin, Ben [mailto:BaldwinB @Tri-Met.org] Sent: Wednesday, August 25, 2010 10:00 AM To: Gilliland, Scott W. Subject: RE: FW: AutoZone on Pacific highway bus stop ;p 2 .26,61 - 17 Hi Scott: �J 055 5 W / /71 /V The updated plans meet TriMet's needs. Thank you for including us. Ben Baldwin FILE COPY TriMet Project Planning 503 962 2140 From: Gilliland, Scott W. [mailto:gillilands @hdjdg.com] Sent: Thursday, August 19, 2010 9:50 AM To: Baldwin, Ben Subject: RE: FW: AutoZone on Pacific highway bus stop Sorry Ben, That email got long enough that I should have clarified. The first part of the email contained a link to a place where you can download the plan set. At this point the link could have expired. Please let me know if the link doesn't work and I'll send another one. Scott Gilliland- Sent from my Cell Phone Phone: (360)695-3488 Email:gillilands@8hdida.com 1 On Aug 19, 2010 8:24 AM 9Idwin, Ben <BaldwinB @Tri-N org> wrote: The plan you forwarded focuses on demolition. Can you share a plan that more clearly shows what you intend to build? With that, I'd be happy to write an email of support. Ben From: Gilliland, Scott W. [mailto:gillilands©hdjdg.coml Sent: Wednesday, August 18, 2010 7:45 PM To: Baldwin, Ben; hap @ tgard-or.gov Cc: Burnes, Kelley Subject: Re: FW: AutoZone on Pacific highway bus stop Yes Ben, our construction plan accomidates your March comments. In order for us to obtain approval of our plans from the City of Tigard I need an email from you stating that you are OK with our plans. Thanks for your help on this. Scott Gilliland - Sent from my Cell Phone Phone: (360)695-3488 Email: gillilands @hdjdg.com On Aug 18, 2010 5:08 PM, Baldwin, Ben <BaldwinB @trimet.org> wrote: Hi Scott: The attached plan shows what TriMet requested. Hopefully it matches your construction plan. Ben 2 , From: Baldwin, Ben Sent: Tuesday, March 30, 2010 3:40 PM To: 'hap @ tgard-or.gov' Subject: AutoZone on Pacific highway bus stop Hello Hap: Attached is a sketch of what would best serve TriMet's needs at the bus stop (loc. ID #4254) located adjacent to the proposed AutoZone store. I would like to add a 10' long concrete pad to serve the front door of the bus and use the pad already shown in the plans to serve the rear door of the bus. Both pads can be designed to City of Tigard sidewalk standards (200psi, 4" minimum depth etc.) and can accommodate a cross slope of 0-2%. As shown, the new bus stop will be located about 55' east of the crosswalk and 77' west of its current location. The 30' long bus stop area should be free of trees to improve the line of sight between bus operators and waiting patrons, but trees can be placed immediately east and west of the designated stop area. Please let me know if the pad already shown in the plans serves another purpose that conflicts with the bus stop placement. Sincerely, Ben Baldwin Project Planner TM Transit Development 503-962-2140 3 r • Autozone, Inc. • • 123 South Front Street. • • Memphis,TN 38103 • Dept. 8320 AUTOZONE, INC RECEIVED September 8,2010 S E p 0 9 2010 Ms Shirley Treat CITY OF TIGARD City of Tigard OR PLANNING/ENGINEERING 13125 SW Hall Blvd. Tigard, OR. 97223 503-718-2426 RE: AUTOZONE FACILITY: 13405 S.W. Pacific Hwy-Tigard, OR. Ms. Treat Please find enclosed a check for$50 and the Application for new Address assignment for this new AutoZone Store. Sincerely, nA VI gla ' Mitch Bramlitt Assistant Design Manager (800)285-2223 ext 8714 fax 901-495-8991 Mitch.Bramlitt @AutoZone.com The Best Parts at the Right Price f ' City of Tigard Address & Commercial Suite Application TIGARD Application Addresses and suite numbers are assigned by the City of Tigard. Once a new address/suite is issued, the City notifies 911, USPS, Washington County and various utility providers. This does not change any account information or replace a "change of address" form. Directions To Submit Form > Fill in form > via email to pauWtigard-or.gov ➢ Attach Site Map or Suite Layout Map (see below) > By fax to 503-684-8840 > Fees will be charged when new address is ➢ In person: Permit Center Building Counter assigned (13125 SW Hall Blvd., Tigard, OR) Fees: Do not pay when you submit form City of Tigard Addressing Contact: Per address $50 Paul lzatt, Public Works Y Per suite $50 pauli @tigard-or.gov ➢ Suite or address to be retired — no charge 503-718-2589 > Re-activating suites in our system — no charge Required Attach Site Map or Suite Layout Map • For Site Maps — show location of building on lot, front entrance & location of driveway along street • For Suite maps — show the locations of current active suites, new suites and suites to be retired Site Information Parcel Number or Current Address: 13405 SW Pacific Hwy ❑ Residential Property OR ® Commercial Property Building Name (if applicable): Is this property currently in the Land Use process (i.e. partition, site development review)? No Contact Information Contact Person: Mitch Bramlitt - AutoZone, Inc Property Management Company (if applicable): Phone: 901-495-8714 Email: mitch.bramlitt(a�autozone.com City of Tigard I 13125 SW Hall Blvd.,Tigard, OR 97223 I 503-718-2589 I www.tigard-or.gov r CITY OF TIGARD RECEIPT Iii S 13125 5W Hall Blvd.,Tigard OR 97223 503.639.4171 TIGARD Receipt Number: 179416 - 09/09/2010 CASE NO. FEE DESCRIPTION REVENUE ACCOUNT NUMBER PAID S0R2009-00007 Address Fee 1003100-43113 $50.00 Total: $50.00 PAYMENT METHOD CHECK# CC AUTH.CODE ACCT ID CASHIER ID RECEIPT DATE RECEIPT AMT Check 711188 KPEERMAN 09/09/2010 $50.00 Payor: AutoZone Total Payments: $50.00 Balance Due: $0.00 Page 1 of 1 OSEPH TY EE PECIALIST March 10,2011 CERTIFIED ARBORIST HDJ Design Group, PLLC Andy Nuttrock 300 W. 15`h Street PROVIDING Vancouver, WA 98660 KNOWLEDGEABLE Re: Final Tree Inspection CARET FOR TREES A utozone 13405 SW Pacific Hwy IN THE URBAN Tigard,OR 97223 ENVIRONMENT Dear Andy. On March 8', I visited the property located at the above mentioned address. This project has been completed as per the report specifications.The trees,slated to be kept.are still there and alive.The mitigation trees have been installed with the new landscape. If you have any questions please feel free to call. Sincere Joseph a Certified Arborist PNW/ISA #0148 PO Box 12 395 PORTLAND, OREGON 97712 (503)331-0452 FAX 282-6179 arborto telelxorr.com www.ha rp ry rrtes.c o rrm MEMBER ISA&NAA CCB#84426 Week. d County,Oregon 2011-023637 11!t-AON 1 0312112011 10:28:37 AM Cnh1 Omni tCORD01 efrc 4-70/Avviit t4 $11.00 1e.00 111.00 116.00-Total •$411.00 After Recording Send A Copy To: 111111111011 1111011111 111101 111111 City of Tigard 0104183201100238370030034 Attn: Hap Watkins i,Richard Hobernlcht,Director of Amassment and ac'i Taxation and Ex-Officio County Clerk for Washington Ab., .►s '_ 13125 SW Hall Blvd. County,Oregon,do hereby certify that the whhln s ' Instrument of writing was realved a d rood In the Tigard, OR 97223 book of records of said coupf . w Richard Hobemicht,Director of Assessment and a- : Taxation,Ex-Officio County Clerk File No.:SDR2009-00007 TREE RESTRICTIVE COVENANT DEED RESTRICTION Declarant is the owner of property described as Exhibit A me S C- ea F714141... 4h d Di 4 nqe H• Wall Declarant has preserved or retained trees over and across portions of said property in accordance with the Conditions of Approval of said plat. Any such preserved or retained tree (#1 and #2) shown on the Tree Preservation Plan (Exhibit B) may be removed only if the tree dies or is hazardous according to a certified arborist. This deed restriction may be removed or will be considered invalid if all trees preserved in accordance with this section should either die or be removed as hazardous. THIS AGREEMENT shall be deemed a Covenant running with the land and is binding upon the owners of property described as Exhibit A Washington County,Oregon and their successors and assigns. IN WITNESS THEREOF, the Declarant has executed this agreement on that date and year set forth below. DECLARANT: INITIAL STATE OF OREGON,COUNTY OF WASHINGTON ') This instrument was acknowledged before me byslamCS C. Ckiffith Was H. Hull it /027 46,i2.. NO4er PUBLIC— C ' _ ■ • roviorscf.e Date My Commission Expires ' SI ASE •:* '; 4i of tEt1 i Pu« &,• FI BY C '�NilIrIII►lIlllltl,`` DESCRIPTION A tract of land in the Southwest one-quarter of Scction 2,Township 2 South,Range 1 West, of the Willamette Meridian,in the City of Tigard,County of Washington and the state of Oregon,described as follows: Beginning at the Northeasterly corner of that property deeded to Alexander"Luty and Pauline E Luty and described in Book 355 Page 74 of the Deed Records of Washington County,said point of beginning being North 89° 48'40"East 283.23 from the two inch iron pipe marking the initial point of Melrose,a plat of record,said point also being on the Northwesterly boundary of the relocated West side Pacific Highway (Oregon State Highway 99,West)Thence North 33° 15'17"East,along the Northwesterly boundary of said Pacific Highway 85.00 feet to the true point of beginning; thence North 56°44'43"West 140.00 feet; thence North 33° 15'17"East 181.15 feet; thence North 56° 44'43"West 28.00 feet; thence North 33° 15' 17"West 68.00 feet; thence South 56°44'43"East 168.00 feet to the northwesterly right of way of said Pacific Highway; thence South 33' 15' 17"West,along said right of way 249.15 feet to the point of beginning; r • r I i` r r ttJ // .. •^ ....• s • \ /� \ , i' (14' \../ t."-"?..P eijoi.: 1 EXTG TREE#1 16' I ,i TO REMAIN .._ Lt � s. — ` 1 i n 1 PROPOSED li :I MITIGATION - TREE(3-) r 1 I i , . _ _ F 1 a• 11 1 • � ' I EXTG TREE#8 4• p it n PROPOSED ; ': —'-`-"'-'-" -_ 1 0 TO REMAIN , �, v, ii tea_._._.__..__. I:•MITIGATION ,: EXTG TREE#3(T) — TREE(3") I '' TO BE REMOVED ! ! —� t'' ii p -. ) ........ h"'-'-1 EXTG TREE#5(i8') I■��■f1 1 . l C -- i TO BE REMOVED I mu .-...._._i —_.._...._. , ti 1 - ---- ------ i ------- EXTG TREE#9 4•....------- EXTG TREE X2 16'1 - •- - _ - I TO REMAIN 1. i TO REMAIN I ._..^___ Ali \ '' _ - EXTG TREE I i1 E #7 I V EXTG TREE V B" I TO REMAIN �g�'' TO BE REMOVED _ ® 0 , -4....i.)., .I., .i., ,,=. ._..r ._ .- ,„, ;_,_„....„.. .4,, II., e ' �` y ! I i I 1/% ( .•••••••-••• i EXTG TREE#6 10") s j Fr ' TO BE REMOVED P f 1 y�� I i a. 1 r� lil r: n ' PROPOSED `%. __ �� / II MITIGATION �`- n / \\ °,� `' TREE(3") F'i u / \ >t ~` =s RETAINING \1 it ii ` WALL %1: /� 1, I „ = VIS t. mar w _ 1 .'� Mr ‘11. 1 g : �x I 1 - te -__ ---- ___--- - ----------- _--; 1‘,........._ _.._-- --_..............._. ---- - -- SW PACIFIC H!G H A i. _.-----._.__ __._.._---___-'� _ ---_...___ _.-__--.-.-----_.....--------_- 9 . '" regon Department of Transportation District 2A 17i: ' John A.Kitzhaber,MD,Governor 6000 SW Raab Rd Portland,OR 97221 Phone(503)229-5002 Fax(503)297-6058 April 5,2011 Final Inspection Letter RECEIVED AutoZone, Inc. v- r -.PPD 7 APR 0 5 2011 123 South Front Street CITY OF TIGARD Memphis,TN 38103 ANMnG/ENGINEERING Subject: Frontage improvements for AutoZone Store on Hwy 99W Permit#2AM40953 Dear Mitch Bramlitt: This letter confirms findings of the site inspection for the above referenced permitted project. You and/or your contractor are advised as follows: ( ) The following variances from the permit provisions were noted and arrangements must be made to correct the facility in accordance with ORS 374.320. (X) Project has been completed substantially in conformance with the permit provisions and no further work is necessary. A request to release your bond has been placed. ( ) The facilities have not been constructed. Up to a one year extension may be granted upon written request. Arrangements must be made within 30 days. Failure to reapply shall be cause for cancellation of the permit. ( ) The completion date was previously extended for one year. This permit is cancelled. If you have any questions,please call me at(503)-229-5267. Since , Steven Schalk District Access Management Coordinator �'y City of Tigard Ji . �� > -iiy,o're - ° TDT—COUNTYWIDE TRANSPORTATION DEVELOPMENT TAX .: '=. Rate Calculation Worksheet ( Oztk °r��- __. . ...,x - ._..sue_... .... __ ,_ y.....a. •........... ._....2.....�i:,:- -.._ =:3,•=:`-v°F,:C-=::(.. APPLICANT 4n) .aAre DATE -/ 2 9 i v MAILING ADDRESS / 2 3 •n . pnr r- 57--- PREPARED Y // CITY/ ZIP / PHONE Hem,j fs - 3 r/V 3 PLANS CHECK-ll�j�>?2,49-,01 ''/ryT a PROJECT TITLE TAX MAP# j / 0Ze '3c�, , / Ore '� SITUS#ADDRESS /3 4405- po/ ^% FORMER USE(S) 1/i/o4 -- /3o/io 'V///0 "Gf 30A/ USE ITE # f TDT DESCRIPTION,(NOTES # CODE UNITS X RATE = AMOUNT / 931 5 35;/15 CO/ xr 51g3 x - x x = TOTAL TDT,FORMER USE(S) PROPOSED USE(S) USE ITE # _ TDT DESCRIPTION/NOTES # CODE UNITS X RATE = AMOUNT I rib � �s�G• x E: S x x = TOTAL TDT,PROPOSED USE(S) ,28 G T / ,i5/3 56-41 LESS TOTAL TDT,FORMER USE(S) — 54/ / /5 67, / 5-3 TDT INCREASE/(DECREASE) < . -lf"-ii (INCREASE =TDT DUE) 5.-7 q PAYMENT METHOD r �'J " v� CASH/CHECK kS.: r,_vkhFrt 235 e6 / 3;500,a._ i ,1 eE- CREDIT o o D S£i 4 ToPI PI/Et/ c,,6eof /2.8 EL_ BANCROFT AGREEMENT (PROMISSORY NOTE) i w � it{ try ' ` o " "'o DEFER TO OCCUPANCY --` 57)6.5 I/OFS/CD/FORMS/TDT Rate Calculation Worksheet.indd(Rev.4/22/09) 1141 CITY OF TIGARD CERTIFICATE OF OCCUPANCY Permit#: BUP2010-00169 COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT Permit Issued: 11/30/2010 TIGARD 13125 SW Hall Blvd.,Tigard OR 97223 503.718.2439 Parcel: 2S102CB01802 Jurisdiction: Tigard 2_00q 000C.9 Site address: 13407 SW PACIFIC HWY Subdivision: Lot: 0 Project Description: New construction. Class of Work: NEW Type of Use: COM Type of Constr: VB Occupancy Group: M Occupancy Load: 215 Fire Sprinkler Required: No Project Name: AutoZone Owner: BAR-AM LIMITED LIABILITY COMPANY BY AUTOZONE INC#3756 DEPT 8088 MEMPHIS,TN 38101 Phone: Contractor: CORESTONE CONTRACTORS LLC PO BOX 2280 SNOHOMISH,WA 98291 Phone: 360-862-8316 Fax: This Certificate issued 4/19/2011 grants occupancy of the above referenced building or portion thereof and confirms that the building has been inspected for compliance with the 2010 State of Oregon Specialty Codes for the group,occupancy,and use under which the referenced permit was issued. Mark VanDomelen Building Official City of Tigard POST IN CONSPICUOUS PLACE