Loading...
CUP1992-00002POOR QUALITY RECORD PLEASE NOTE: The original paper record has been archived and put on microfilm. The following document is a copy of the microfilm record converted back to digital. If you have questions please contact City of Tigard Records Department. • learojeguillimminica" —11065 SW North Dakota 121 34D130 300 PD R 024004-- TR A WISPAITTAL To: Mark Roberts, Planner CITY OF TIGARD , Community Development 13125 SW Hall Blvd. Tigard, OR .97223 pmjed: Tigard/Metzger Parking Addition Project numbcr: 97167 page Tuesday, September 01, 1998 Number of page including this Ate!. FAX number: 5984960 Telephone number: 639-4171 ex. 317 We tranonit: 0 Fax 0 Overnight 0 Other Item Date Description . „ 2 8/21/98 Arborist Report & Tree Inventory 2 8/31/98 Sheet L1.1 Revised Landscape Plan. 1 Tigard Facsimile request. Re: LDS Church 11065 SW N.Dakota St. PC# 6-110c S!T# 98-0025 Provided per your request. Please Have Debbie, in Development services call me when the Complete Pemiit is ready to be picked up. I need to review the total cost for permits with her as soon as possible. C op les Im k 97167 gdo'4,ltitia 1,14 r rags tnit ied by: Michael Roberts 4.a 1-A1 COMMENTS: L4 Re: 1 DS Church, 11065 SW N. Dakota St, Tigard, OR Brian Rager, Engineering, 6394171, ext 3IW, has noted that he needs to r v,w the water quality calculations before he will sign off on the issuance of this site permit. .t +a- ...✓++ +��_ «. a�6rw1; "wr�7,74Y�t"_54"L'r�iYa6i�k.Ys. �v�a.wria..wk�waY Y.p4Ys.pa. 1.•∎• 07 ✓27/98 MON 12 :53 FAX , ;' 3 598 1990 To: rep CITY OF TIGARD Michizel Roberts Cerny: LRS Architects _11Qa '77167 Facsimile Fax: From: Company: Phone: Fax: Date: Pages including this page: Debbie Adernski, Development Services City of Tigard (503) 639 -4171 (503) 508 -1969 7-27-98 1 \ Mark Roberts, Planning, 8394171. r e . 317, Indicates that you still need to +ac tnplete cold tions of approval 3C & 3E. Condition 3C requires an arboristt report & mitigation plans Condition 3E requires tree spacing at no more than 39` on center. hope this rs the information that you were requesting. If yoi; have specific questions In regards to these condrtions, I suggest that you speak with either Brian or Mari In the mean time the site permit will be on hold until they sign off on the conditions. a` City of 710ard, 13125 SW Mali Eivd., Tl rd, OR 97223 PLf A$E DELIVER ThIS PAX IMMEDIATELY *" TREE & PLANT PRESERVATION/PROTECTION PART 1 - GENERAL 1.01 DESCRIPTION A. General requirements: preservation, protection, and trimming of existing trees and shrubs, and other vegetation indicated to remain. E. Definitions: 1. Consulting Arborist A Consulting Arborist registered with the American Society of Consulting Arborists (ASCA) . 2. Certified ArborLst: Certified by The International Society of Arboriculture (ISA) . 1.02 PROJECT CONDITIONS: A. Make every effort to protect all trees, shrubs, ground cover and other vegetation existing on the Project site with the exception of that indicated to be removed. 8. Meet local jurisdiction requirements for protection of existing trees and vegetation. C. Provide temporary fencing, barricades and required to protect trees and plants, ± are to remain, from all damage. Erect prior to commencement of clearing and demolition work and remove only after all work potentially injurious to trees and other plants is complete. Fence shall be placed as far from trees as is practical, but in no instance closer than one foot behind q limits. Pence shall by 0 required con�truGtion, l.im�.ts visibility plastic on steel posts placed no further than 6° apart extending no less than 4 --1/2r above the ground, kept taut at all times. D . Protect all trees from stockpiling, material storage, vehicle parking and driving within the tree drip line or tree protection fence area. E. Protect all plant growth including root systems of trees and plants from: 1. Dumping of refuse. 2. Chemically injurious materials and liquids. Noxious materials in solution caused by run-off and spillage during mixing and placement of construction materials, and drainage from stored materials. 4. Continual puddling of running water. F. Restrict vehicular and foot traffic to prevent compaction of soil over root systems. PART 2 - PRODUCTS 2.01 MATERIALS: A. As indicated and required elsewhere in this Specification Section, and as may be recommended by Consulting Arborist. PART 3 - EXECUTXON 3.01 GENERAL! A. Protect root systems of existing trees, shrubs and grand covers from damage due to noxious materials in solution caused by run-off and spillage during mixing and placement of construction materials, and drainage from stored materials. B. Protect root systems from flooding r erosion, excessive wetting tnd drying resulting from de-watering and other operations, C. Protect all existing plant matenial to remain against unnecessary cutting, breaking and skinning of roots and branches, skinning or bruising of bdrk. D. Do not allow fires under and adjacent to trees or other plants which are to remain. E. Engage a Consulting Arborist to direct removal of branches from trees and large shrubs, which are to remain, if requited to clear new construction and where indicated; and to direct tree root pruning and r:location work. V. Where directed by Consulting Arborist, extend pruning operations to restore natural shape of entire tree. G. Cut branches and roots with sharp pruning instruments. Do not break, chop or mutilate. 4 ..* * " 4 H. Water trees and other vegetation which are to remain as necessary to maintain their health during the course of the work, Maintain a water schedule and document. 3.02 EXCAVATION AROUND TREES: A. Excavate within root zone of trees only where indicated and acceptable to the Consulting Arborist. B. Excavate around tree roots within tree root one only under the direction of a Consulting Asboriat retained by the Contractor. C. Where trenching for utilities is required within root zones, tunnel under and around roots by hand digging. Do not cut in lateral support roots. Cut smaller roots which interfere with installation of new work; use sharp pruning tools. D. Where excavating for new construction is required within root zones of trees, hand excavate to minimize damage to root systems. Use narrow tine spading forks and comb soil to expose roots. Relocate rootS in backfill areas whenever possible. If large, main lateral roots are encountered, expose beyond excavation limits as required to bend and relocate without breakiAg. E. If encountered immediately adjacent to location of new const;uction and relocation is not practical, cut roots approximately 6 inches back from new construction. V. Do not allow exposed roots to dry out before permanent backfill is placed; provide temporary earth cover, pack with wet peat moss or 4 layers of wet untreated burlap and temporarily support and protect from damage until permanently relocated and covered with bLckfill. Water puddle backfill to eliminate voids and air pockets. G. All pruning shall be performed to ANSI A-300 Pruning standards by Oregon state registered tree care firms employing Ceztified Arborists. Other therapeutic care work shall be performed to National Arborist Association standards. 4. 3.03 GRADING AND FILLING AROUND TREES: A. Maintain existing grade within root zones of trees unless otherwise indicated or acceptable to The Consulting Arborist. '■••" A 4, 4' • , ; B. Lowering Grades: Where existing grade is above new finish grade shown around trees, under direction of Consulting Arborist, carefully hand excavate within root zones to new grade. Cut roots exposed by excavation to approximately 3 inches below elevation of new finish grade. C. Raising Grades: Permitted only as acceptable to The Consulting Arborist. 3.04 REPAIR AND REMOVAL OF TREES: A. Retain a Consulting Arborist to direct tree repair work. Engage a Certifled Arborlst, acceptable to the Consulting Arborist, to perform tree repair work. Repair trees damaged by construction operations in a manner acceptable to the Consulting Arborist. Make repairs promptly after damage occurs to prevent progressive deterioration of damaged trees. B. Remove dead and damaged trees which are determined by the Consulting Arborist to be incapable of restoration to normal growth pattern. 3.05 REPAIR AND REPLACEMENT OF SHIMS: A. Repair shrubs, and other vegetation damaged by construction operations in a manner acceptable to the Consulting Arborist. Make repairs promptly after damage occurs to prevent progressive deterioration of damaged plants. Be Remove and replace dead and damaged plants which are determined by the Consulting Arborist incapable of restoration to normal growth pattern. 1. Provide new shrubs of same size and species as those replaced or as otherwise acceptable to the Consulting Arborist. 2. Plant and maintain as acceptable to the Consulting Arborist. 3.06 HARDSCAPE INSTALLATION WITHIN TREE PROTECTION ZONES: A. Electrical conduit and irrigatior main lines should be run under walkwaysk within stone or concrete subase, and should not cut into native soil within the Tree Protection Zone (within the drip line). Drip irrigation shall be installed within the Tree protection Zone. Lateral electrical lines to individual lights, should be installed as close to the soil surface as possible with short runs from the main conduit. „, • B. Electrical fixtures, housing, and irrigation valves must be installed with care to avoid cutting roots. Digging must be minimal with excess dirt removed from the tree preservation area. Do not cut roots greater than 1" in diameter without the approval of the Consulting Arborist. Roots greater than 1" in diameter exposed during excavation must be cut squarely at the edge of the excavation with a sharp say or appropriate pruning tool. C. Install walkways as close to grade as possible to minimize excavation into the soil where large roots and areas of high root density exist. Bb.ckfill with loose dirt to the minimum depth necessary to achieve a natural look. Mulch if appropriate, as directed by the Consulting Arborist. 3.07 COMPENSATION TO OWNER FOR TREES: A. Contractor shall pay the Owner the value of existing trees to remain that died or were damaged and required removal because of the Contractor's failure to provide adequate protection and maintenance. B. Value of existing trees will be deterw,ned by the Consulting Arborist in accordance with the evaluati,3n formula set forth in "The Council of Tree and Landscape tvaluation Guide for Plant Appraisers," Eighth Edition, 1992. C. Any wound or damage to a preserved tree constitutes partial injury. These include, but are not limited to Any cambium tissue damage, Unauthorized cutting, breaking or removing tree branches. Unauthorized cutting or damaging protected root zones. Soil compaction. Toxic run-off into tree preservation areas. D. Partial injury will be calculated by percentage of the total value of the damaged tree. E. The loss value penalty will include cost to the owner for loss appraisal by the Consulting Arborist plus the cost for necessary damage repair. PART 4 PRE-CONSTRUCTION TEE 4.01 PRUNING AND STRUCTURAL SUPPORT: I-, All trees designated to be retained within the project limits shall be pruned to ANSI: N-300 Pruning Standards. with 3elective low limb removal, as directed and approved by the Consulting Arborist, where required for construction clearance. • B. Structural support (cabling) will be required on specific trees as identified by the Consulting Arborist, to National Arborist Association Standards. C. All therapeutic care recommended will be directed, inspected and approved by the Consulting Arborist. PART 5 - POST-CONSTRUCTION TREE CARE 5.01 FERTILIZATION /AERATION A. Aeration as determined by the Consulting Arborist may be required in areas where construction compaction has occurred. B. Deep root liquid injection fertilizing or all trees retained within the project limits will be required following the completion of construction to National Arborist Association Standards. The timing of this fertilizing will be determined by the Consulting Arborist. Prepared by: Bob Hazany ASCA #133 Consulting Arborist Robert Mazany and Associates P.O. Box 1305 Beaverton, OR 97075 (503) 646 -0897 • • Resum8 ROBERT MAZANV American Society of Consulting Arborists Registered Member 11133 American College of Forensic Examiners - Diplomate Status The resume of education, training and practical field experience listed as follows is in support of Robert Mazany's qualifications as a Consulting Arborist, ROBERT MAZANY & ASSOCIATES Erincdpal. 1988 to Present: Tree and landscape consulting services. Beaverton, Oregon TREE & LANDSCAPE CONSULTING SERVICES, LTD, Portland, Oregon frincippl. 19(14io_12K Arboricultural and Landscape Consultation and Contract Administration, TEKTRONIX, INC, Landseeptand GroundaleintenaumManage (U.)MALIM: All aspects of construction and maintenance of 600+ acres of industrial campus, Beaverton, Oregon ARBORICULTURE & LANDSCAPE CONSULTATI( N SERVICE Beaverton, Oregon SlfEmp1oyed. 1975 to 1977: Consulting projects in landscape construction and tree surgery. CITY OF EUGENE, DEPARTMENT OF PARKS & RECREATION HaticailiatLEarestaD(aanAtanaus-12621Q1,921. Eugene, Oregon TRELEMEIDUJAIDSCAPE lfalitACMB,gcaas,U2,atoia(2: All aspects of tree work and landscape design including installation. 12A_VELTN:',FaSEEELOMPANY,..194.8 to 1956: Line clearing, chemical brush control, tree surgery, and large tree moving. Ohio/Tex MAJOR CONSULTING PROJECTS COMPLETED/IN PROGRESS (,) City of Portland, Bureau of Parks - Pier Park - Plaza Blocks City Hall. (F) Nike World Headquarters Campus - North Campus Expansion, Beaverton, Oregon, (1;) Westside Corridor Light Rail - Portland to Hillsboro. ® LDS Temple - Lake Oswego, Oregon. (.:■,) Mentor Graphics World Headquarters Campus - Wilsonville, Oregon, 60 Oregon Department of Transportation/Washington County - Road Improvement projects. Neabeck Hill Development - Philomath, Oregon. Metropolitan Service District Washington Park Zoo Renovation/Expansion. State of Oregon - State Capitol Grounds - Oregon State University - PERS Building. (i.! Clackamas County/City of Wilsonville/Tualatin Hills Park and Recreation District - Park Improvement Projects. (F.: City of Beaverton Road Improvements - Library. ® Miscellaneous Construction Projects - Oregon and Washington, ROBERT MAZANY Page Two PRIMARY QUALIFIED EXPERIENCE; AREAS 0 Tree Preservation/Protection Specification Preparation - Supervision - Monitoring, ®"w® Site and Plan Review Related zo Arboricultural Concerns 0 Therapeutic Tree Care Specification Preparation. and Inspection. r® Tree Casualty Loss Evaluation. C� Tree Disk Assessment - Hazard Tree Evaluation, C.) Expert Witness Court Testimony. TECHNICAL EDUCATION Texas A & M University - Horticulture Oregon State i,Jniversity - Horticulture and Forestry University of Oregon - Horticulture and Landscape Architecture National Arbotist Association Educational Programs American Society of Consutling Arborists technical meetings since 1974 International Society of Arboriculture technical meetings since 1961 Western Chapter of the International Society of Arboriculture - Regional and annual technical meetings since 1961 Pacific Northwest Chapter technical meetings since 1980 People to People Internat onal - Member of Landscape Horticulture Delegation to Mainland China - October 1985 PROFESSIONAL MEMBERSHIPS 1978 - Present Professional Grounds Management Society 1974 - Present American Society of Consulting Arborists 1970 - Present American Forestry Association 1961 - Present International Society of Arboriculture 1980 - i 989 Chapter Representative to International Society 1982 = 19113 Pacific Northwest Chapter President (two tercels, Pounding Men4her 1980) 1998 Member by Invitation - Diplomate of the American College of Forensic Examiners GUEST SPEAKER AND /OH INSTRUCTOR Pacific Northwest Chapter - Certification Review Board Member International Society of Arboriculture - Western, PNW, Ohio, Atlantic and Texas Chapters Portland Civil Service Commission Arboriculture Interview Panel Member Portland Department of Pars & Recreation - High Climber Training Oregon State University - Horticulture Classes and Short Courses Clackamas Community College - Apprenticeship Training Lane Community College - Horticulture and Forestry Classes University of Oregon Landscape Architect Department PCC (Rock Creek) - Horticulture/Arboriculture Oregon State Extension Service Short Courses Additional project or reference information ormation furnished, if required or requested MEMORANDUM TO: Michael Roberts, Assoc .fate LRS Architects FROM: Robert iViazany ASCA #133 Consulting Arborist DATE: August 21, 1998 RlE;: Tigard/Metzger Parking Addition 1 have completed my preliminary site and plan review of the proposed parking addition as requested, Based on the following field observations it is my opinion that no mitigation is required per Section 18A 50,025 of the City of Tigard Development Code, 1, Trees adjacent to the east property line on the Topographic/Tree Survey were incorrectly identified as Cherry and one 'Maple, The one identified as Maple is an Oregon Ash, 11 inches in diameter as measured 4.5 feet above the ground, The remainder to be removed are native Willow, The large double stem tree identified as a Sequoia is a Pine, possibly Western White Pine, 3, The Willow are an undesirable specie in very poor condition and unsuitable to remain in a developed landscape. They are in serious decline, most having less than fifty percent viable crown with deadwood throughout. It is my opinion these trees can be treated as having a negative value due to specie and condition. • Michael Roberts August 21, 1998 Page Two With the exception of two Willow, there are no trees to be ►moved which measure larger than twelve inches in diameter. 5. The proposed landscape plan provides sufficient desirable vegetation to enhance the area to be improved and provides for ' ;e retention of the larger Douglas Fir and Pine.. I would recommend that the Pine and Douglas Fir located at the northeast corner of the property be pruned to ANSI A -500 Crown Cleaning standards for the removal of deadwood ore inch in diameter and larger with interior crown thinning not to exceed fifteen percent. This should be accomplished prior to the start of any construction activity in conjunction with the site clearing phase of the project, Tree protection measures must be in place as specified ire the attached Tree and Plant nreservation/Protection requirements odor to the start of constt ue.tion and remain in place throughout the duration of constructions. I have also amended the attached plan for tree specie and diameter corrections. I trust this information will be sufficient for your needs at this time. Plea a contact me when. I may be of further assistance on this project, 4 SMII•1111110.01.11•11111iMOMMIIMMIII.••■•■•1611111M01.01111111111=1M01111.11•11.111•11111111MIN February 4, 1998 • Mark Diloreto, AIA LRS Architects 1121 SW Salmon, Suite 100 Portland, OR 97205 CITY OF TIG OREGON RE: Church of Jesus Christ of LDS; 11065 SW North Dakota Street Dear Mr. Diloreto: This letter is in response to your request for a minor modification to an approved Conditional Use Permit (CUP 92-0002/PDR 92-0004). The modification would remove trees and associated landscape islands, replace these areas with parking and expand the parking area to construct a new row of 28 parking spaces. The Tigard Community Development Code, Conditional Use Permit Review Section, states: "if the requested modigaryi of the r r modification criteria that ,tliismatts)ia be reviewed as a new Conditional Use Reviewmpl." Section 18.130.050(B) states that the Director shall determine that a major modification(s) will result if one (1) or more of the following changes are proposed. There will be: 1. A change in land use. The request for additional parking does not classify as a change of land use 2. An increase in dwelling unit density. This criterita is not applicable as this request does not involve residential dwelling units. 3. A ten (10) percent change in the ratio of different types of dwelling units to the number of units. Then criteria is not applicable as this request does not involve residential dwelling units, 4 A change in the type of commercial or industrial structures, The proposed modification requires no change of the structure as defined by the Uniform Building Code, A change in the type and location of accessways and parking areas where off-site traffic would be affected, This request does not require a change in accessways or parking areas where off•site traffic would be affected, 13125 SW Hall Blvd., Tigcrd, OR 97223 (503) 639-4171 TDD (503) 684-2772 6. An increase in the floor area proposed for non-residential use by more than ten (10) percent where previously specified. This criteria is not applicable as the request does not involve expansion of the existing structure. 7. A reduction of more than ten (10) percent of the area reserved for common open space and/cr usable open space. Common open space was not required as part of a Conditional Use Permit. 8,, A reduction of specified setback requirements by more than 20 percent. The proposed expansion of the parking area will continue to provide the minimum 20-foot side yard setback required of a religious assembly use. 9. An elimination of project amenities (Recreational facilities, Screening; and/or, Landscaping provisions) by more than ten (10) percent where previously specified. Recreational facilities were not required as part of the Conditional Use approval. Reduction of project amenities (landscape islands) are less than ten (10) percent of the landscaping provided. 10. A t»»n (10) percent increase in the approved density. This criteria is not applicable as this request does not involve residential dwelling units. This request is, therefore, determined to be a minor modificatien. The Director's designee has determined that the proposed minor modification of this existing site will promote the general welfare of the City and will not be significantly detrimental, nor injurious, to surrounding properties provided that development which occurs after this decision complies with applicable local, state and federal laws. The City of Tigard Building Division has reviewed the request and states that the applicant shall obtain a site permit prior to construction. The City of Tigard Engineering Department has reviewed the request and states that the applicant's plans indicate that additional impervious areas will be added to this site. It does not appear that the surface water runoff from this new parking area could be properly treated in the existing drainage swab e along the north property line. Therefore, it- accordance with Unified Sewerage Agency (USA) Design and Construction Standards, the applicant shall submit a design for an additional water quality facility to treat the additional runoff. The new facility shall be constructed as a part of the new parking lot improvements. REQUEI$iA.BEEJ APPROVED sge,JEcup, • 1.• • ro. • • .4. • 0.04 —41 1111E FOLLOWING CONDItIONS Oil' APPROVAL . • The applicant shall obtain a site permit from the Building Division. 2/4/98 Mark Diloreto/LFtS Architects Letter re: Church of Jesus Christ of LDS Minor Mod. Approval 11065 SW North Dakota Street; WCTM 1S134DB , 00500 Page 2 of 4, • 2. The applicant shall provide an ors -site water quality facility as required by USA Design and Construction Standards (adopted by Resolution and Order No. 96 =44). plans shall be submitted to the Engineering Department Final fans and calculations prior to issuance of the site permit. In (Brian Rager) for review and approval pri p addition, a proposed maintenance plan shall be submitted along with the plans and calculations for review and approval 3. Revised site and landscaping plans shall be submitted for review by the Planning Division. STAFF CONTACT; William D °Andrea, Planning Division (503) 639-4171, ext. 315» The revised plans shall include the following: A. Retainage an area of the existing landscaping islands for parking lot trees. Section 18.100. r 10.A. states that trees shall be planted in landscaped islands in all parking areas and shall be equally distributed on the basis of one (1) tree for each seven (7) parking spaces in order to provide a canopy effect. The minimum dimension on the landscape islands shall be three (3) feet wide and the landscaping shall be protected from vehicular damage by some form of wheel guard or curb; Two (2) additional landscaping islands for parking lot trees within the new parking areas; `� s that a tree plan for O. Tree inventory and Plan. q Section 18150 »025 requires the planting, removal and protection of trees prepared by a certified arborist shall be provided with a Conditional Use application. The tree plan shall include identification of all existing trees, identification of a, program to save existing trees or mitigate tree removal over 12 inches in caliper, which trees are to be removed, protection program defining standards and methods that will be used by the applicant to protect trees during and after construction; D. Parking Lot Landscaping. Section 18.100.110(A) requires the screening of parking and loading areas, Landscaped parking areas shall include special design features which effectively screen the parking lot area from view: Planting materials to be installed should achieve a relative balance between low lying and vertical shrubbery and trees; used i Screening: . : 0. ...i r matrix to Buffering and : widths Section 181 ®0130 contains the buffer be used in calculating widths of buffering and screening to be installed between proposed uses. The Matrix indicates that where a parking lot i, the required buffer and screening .. shall . be abuts a single-family use, nc� width ten (10) feet. Section 8.100,080.D contains the minimum improvement standards for the buffering area: The minimum improvements within a buffer area shall consist of the following: I) At least one (1) row shall , planted. . i y i. of trees shall be They shall be no less than ten (10) feet high for deciduous trees and five (5) feet high for evergreen trees at the time of planting. Spacing of the trees depends on the size of the tree at maturity: 2/4/98 Mark Diloreto/LFIS Architects Letter re: Church of Jesus Christ of LDS Minor Mod. Approval 11086 SW North Dakota Street; WCTM 15134D , 00500 Page.? of 4' yI ii.) In addition, at least ten (10), five (5)- gallon shrubs; or 20, one (1)° gallon shrubs shall be planted for each 1 000 square feet of required buffer area; and Hi.) The remaining area shall be planted in lawn, groundcover or spread with bark mulch. Section 18.100.080.E states that where screening is required the following standards shall apply in addition to those required for buffering: 1) A hedge of narrow or broadeaf evergreen shrubs which will' form a four (4) -foot continuous screen within two (2) years of planting, or ii) An earthen berm planted with evergreen plant materials which will form a continuous screen six (6) feet in height within two (2) years. The unplanted portion of the berm shall be planted in lawn, goulid cover or bark mulch, or iii,) A five (5) -foot or taller fence or wall shall be constructed to provide a continuous sight obscuring screen. and One (1) additional handicapped parking space. If you need additional information or have any questions, please feel free to call me at (503) 639. 4171 Sincerely, /(1/00-44, ks..4ottea u ' William D`Andrea Associate Planner, ,AICP y » is \curpin \Wui\cUpti2•O2,mmd CL. c 1998 Planning correspondence file CUP 92- 0002/PDR 92 -0004 land use file Tigard Church of Jesus Christ of LDS co ■ �.wonrnrs.. ....��..... ..:.. ........... cxr�A 2/4/99 Mark d 11 ®r ®tV/L ■S ArM hitects Latter.., Page 4 of re: Church of Jesus Christ of LbS Minor Mod. Approval. . 1 '1065 SW North bakota Street; WCT 1 S134bS, 00301 January 15, 19913 James N.P. , Hendryx Director, Community ,Development Department City of Tigard, Oregon 13125 SW Hall Blvd. Tigard, OR 97223 RE: Parking revisions to Tigard / Metzer 1st and 2nd Wards Dear James: Please find following the request for a minor modification to the existing development. A. PROJECT LOCATION: Site Address: 11065 SW North Dakota Street Tax Map and Lot No 1S1 34DB TL 300 Zone: R4.5 B. PROJECT HISTORY: The site is used for a church building of approximately 17,000 square feet and a storage building f X approximately 300 square with related off - street parking. (approved conditional use CUP 92- 0002 / PDR 92- 0004). pP During the December 1996 wind storm, several fir trees were blown down leaving a few unsightly trees remaining within the parking lot, and two to the "west that extend into an existing landscape island. See enclosed photo. SQZG6 ?(O `7ar' Ft'ad y 41 The church traded a parcel at the rear (north) 172.53 feet by 341.26 feet for a parcel .4 to the side (east) 50 feet by 364 feet. The trade was made to help residential ®o w development to the north of the property. a C, REQUEST: u 4 1. We request approval to remove trees, associated landscape islands and replace with parking at three locations. See enclosed Site Plan. a. Because of the unsightly appearance, and the potential danger for additional trees to fall during future wind storms, we request approval to remove trees and associ d landscape islands along the most westerly parking row. This will involve the removal of two ex1sti/%4 trees and the addition of four parking spaces. addit onalstreestto fall during afuture wind storms, we request approval to q� PP re the remove trees t side and associated landscape islands along the middle parking row of parking involving removal of nine existing trees, associated a islan P ; fourteen ds and the addition of fourteen parking spaces. i � on c. Because the existing landscape island is oversized, and additional on -site parking is needed by the users, we request the reduction in size of the parking island near the storage building along the north parking row to allow the addition of two parking spaces. a 0 y e, 0 2. We request approval to place a new row of parking N8 spaces) across the old easterly property line and onto the new acquired parcel. D. NARRATIVE: We believe that our request is a minor modification for the following, which addresses the issues relating to Cl and C2 above as listed in Section 18.130.050.8. 1, A change in Land Use A. (C1a,b, and c). There will be no change in land use. The property will continue to function as a church, ( ) A. C2 , The east parcel was used at a private drive access easement for property to the north of the site (This is uo�w accessed from the subdivision to the North and East). There will be no change in land use for this parcel as this parcel will continue to be used for the driving and parking of automobiles. 2, An increase in dwelling unit density. A, (Cla,b, and c). There will be no increase in dwelling unit density: A. (C2). There will be no increase in dwelling unit density 3, A ten percent change in the ratio of the different types of dwelling units to the number of units. A. (Cla,b, and c). There will be no change in the ratio of the different types of dwelling units to the number of units. A, (C2), There will be no change in the ratio of the different types of dwelling units to the number of units. 4. A change in the type of commercial or industrial structures. A. (Cla,b, and c). There will be no change in the type of commercial or industrial structures, A. (C2). There will be no change in the type of commercial or industrial structures, 5, A change in the type and location of accessways and parking areas where off-site traffic would be affected , A. (Cla,b, and c). Access ways will remain in the same locations. Off- site traffic will not be affected by the additional parking. A, (C2). Access ways will remain in the same locations, Off -site traffic will not be affected by the additional parking. 6, An increase in the floor area p ro osed for nonresidential use by more p than 10 percent where previously specified. A. (Cla,b, and c). There will be no increase i, �the� area proposed ed for nonresidental use by more than 10 specified. A. (C2), There will be no increase iu the floor area proposed for nonresidental use by more than 10 perceat where previously specified. 7. A reduction 'of more than 10 percent of the area reserved for common open space and / or usable open space. A. (Cla,b, and c). This area is r;aotAdesignated as common open space. A. (C2). This area is not designated as common open space. 8. A reduction of specified setback requirements by more than 20 percent. A. (Cla,b, and c). No reduction is- requested. A, (C2), No reduction is requested, 9. An elimination of project amenities by more than 10 percent where previously specified provided such as: a, Recreational facilities, b. Screening, or c. Landscaping provisions, A, ( Cla,b, and c). Reductions of project amenities (landscape areas) are less than 10 percent, A. (C2). Current zoning landscape requirements will b& inet with the additional parking, 10. An 10 percent increase in approved density. A. ( Cla,b, and c). There will be no increase in approved density. A, (C2). There will be no increase in approved density: As answered above, the project does not meet any of the requirements for a major modification and should be considered a minor modification. Please contact me if you have any questions, Sincerely, LRS Architects Mark D, DiLoreto, AIA Associate 4:, ,.4)• ,„ ••,, , ; , • ' *t:t. • v, • .• • • • G ', TV to 1 7 t.D t .,G:,; .4" YVi'7t. t n 'LAS APC11 r`�°i 121 $W • '(1.14.1x1011 P1iMPOti" E tj P i Y 1vik14 • LAND X111 P PL t- "C tai: P YM ,11'1, 01 +901 „1141 14,1 "t 1''um'1 1 q as 1, t' 1' 11��:1' 1 x 1.1a 1410 1tit WUR mut).,1 „M;.1 1 „O ut 1H '11 ;R5 1 "I t >g (1` .c:AoH AMOUNT g "e1', wt4"`t�'i For Minor Mod on LDS Church \Miter Quali The applicant's plans indicate that additional impervious areas will be added to this site. It does not appear that the surface water runoff from this new peeking area could be properly treated in the existing drainage swale along the north property line. Therefore, in accordance with USA Design and Construction Standards, the applicant shall submit a design for an additional water quality facility to treat the additional runoff. The new facility shall be constructed as a part of the new parking lot improvements. \brianr \comments \Idschrchumod • LIMERSINION RIM MN LE I 1111 wee 040400W2,04. oda..hilti,.rr4+. f`+ w i+f Y�tv+wwii..:i NIgY1�1(1MMay —376/2.1r ir-e•„fir`■ insPaatiil )k-tklet 414e. IneI tMMxt_."°"" 1,, 5 k e . d iet ' a a, t5, KKK- Footing Post /l eae, *treat. Post/Beam Mech. Mg. Underfleur Date Rs:, Address: Readers 5an. ti Ran Drain Victor Line rptetirtireet it Oregon 97225 S IN161.11362111 Phones 639 -4171 Freon' Imitation . . hp pr /6dw1k 211461.: -514 cr. Gyp. Iii. -Noah. frOA2Agi TM FOLLOWING ctMxows » 1 1tZ9s C4 "4 Id 445 aP- 4/Klllk' ��. G !/ , f • �j w ��i wwi /lG Inspector: Datet ,,- tiLPLIONZp ox M Rev b . A2PRDVID stimpicT TO Ate~ -,Call Mar Roth. eri AFFIDAVIT OF MAILING STATE OP OREGON County of Washington ) ea. City of Tigard 1/4 being first duly sworn/affirm, on oath dopose and say: (Please print), That I am a for The City of Tigard, Oregon. Thttt I served NOTICE 07 PUBLIC HEARING FOR: .1../lhat X served NOTICE OF DECISION FOR: City of Tigard Planning Director • '▪ 7/Tigard Planning Commission Tigard Hearings Officer Tigard City Council A copy (Public Hearing Notice/Notice of Decision) of which is attached (Marked Exhibit "A) was mailed to each named pe ona at th addreps shown o the attached list marked exhibit "B" on the _242 day of L 4 A 44, 7...... 3,9 . said notice NOTICE OF DELI as here o at.tpched, was post', on an appropriate A bulletin board on the WYm.day of ; and depepitad the e United States Mail on the _.:, day of , postage prepaid. LL* subs bed and sworn/affirm to me on the 19 day of W. vri 1 4 • • CITY OF TIGARD Washington, County NOTICE OF FINAL ORDER - NY PLANNING COMMISSION 1. Concerning Case Number(o): cur 92-000a/PDR 92-0004 hoeseawn■Alaromoweamoor 2. Name of Owner: Church of Jesus Christ of Latter-DAMJAL Name of Applicant: Lee-Ruff-Stark Architects 3. Address 5285W Meadows Roadfaill City Lake pgwego State OR Zip 2705_ 4. Address of Property: 11065 SW North Dakota Street Tax Map and Lot No(s).: 1S1 34DB tax lot 300 5. Request: A recuest for conditional MA2a1MMS..4 _22M611.9.2Mlat.S22222.t.11111 plan approval to construct a church buildin of a roxiMatel 17 000 sop1(refeetairagebuildicimately 300 Ivan; feet with a related off-street.parkincidmo,,apment. APPLICABLE REVIEW CRITERIA: Community DevelgpMent Code Cha tern 18.50 18.96 18.98 18.100 18.1024_32.106 18.108 and 18.130. Zone: 6. Action: R-4.5 (PD) (Residential, 4.5 units/acre, Planned Development) The R-4.5 zone allows single-family residential units, public support facilitie0, residential treatment homes, farming, temporary uses, and accessory structures amt.iq other uses. Approval as requested ••••••■ Approval with conditions Denial 7. Noticet Notice was published in the newspaper, and mailed to: posted at City Hall, x •L. The applicant and owner(s) X Owners of record within the required distptce X The affected Neighborhood Planning Organization X Alfected governmental agencies 8. Final Decidion: THE DECISION SHALL BE FINAL ON AliggrAt_11"1992 UNLESS AN APPEAL IS 'atm. The Adopted findings of fact, deCibiOn, and statement of conditions can be obtained from the Planning Department, Tigard City Ball, 13125 SW Hall, P.O. Bolt 23397, Tigard, Oregon 97223. 0. peal Ay party to the decision may appeal this decision in accordance With 18.32.290(R) and Section 18.32.370 which prOVideAS that a written appeal may be filed within 10 days After notice is given and sent. The appeal may be oubAhted on City forme and must be accompanied by the appeal fee 0315.00j and ttahactipt ooete, (Varlet; up to a Max imum of $500.00): The deadline for filing of an appeal is 3:30 p.m. Agglak114122g_____,. 10, Question:1: If you htve any questions, please call the City of Tigard Planning Department, 639-4171. 111 CITY OF TIGARD PLANNING COMMISSION FINAL ORDER NO. 92-05 PC A Pram ORDER INCLUDING FINDINGS AND CONCLUSIONS WHICH APPROVES AN APPLICATION . A A 17,000 SQUARE FOOT CHURCH AND 300 SQUARE FOOT STORAGE BUILDING REQUESTED L TEC CHURCH OF JESUS CHRIST OF LATTER DAY SAINTS (LEE-RUFF-STARK ARCHnECTS, Rspiurnarrizrm. The Tigard Planning Comaission has reviewed the above application at a public hearing an August 17, 1S92. The Commies/x.0n has based its decision on the facts, findings, and concluoions noted below. „:. 4 • I. SUMMARY OF THE REQUEST CASE: CONDITIONAL USE CUP 92-0002 PLANNED DEVELOPMENT REVIEW PDR 92-0004 COMPREHENSIVE PLAN DESIGNATION: Lor, Density Residential ZONING DESIGNATION: R-4.5 (Residential, 4.5 units per acre, Planned Development). LOCATION: 11065 SW North Dakot,i Street (WCTM 151 34DB, tax lot 300) OWNER: church of Jesus Christ of Latter-Day Saints 50 E. North Temple Street Salt Lake City, UT 84150 APPLICANT: John Stark Lee-Ruff-Stark Architects 5285 SW Meadows Road, #340 Lake Oswego, OR 97305 1. APPLICABLE LAW: Community Deve.opment Code Chapters 18.50.040, 18.50.050(A)(4), 18.80.080, 18.3)0.030, 18.100.035, 18.100.110, 18.102.020, 18.106.020(P), 18.106.o30(8)(9), 18.108.050, 18.108.080, 15.114.130(A)(4), 18.130.0400 18.130 150(C)(10), 18.150.030, 18.164.030(E), 18.164.090, 18.164.100, and Comprehensive Plan, Policy 201.1, 4.2.1, 7.1.2, 7.3.1, 7.4.4 and 8.1.3. 2. Raghgr2pnd information This site was included as part of a previous subdivision/planned development review in 1991 (Hart/Venture SUB 91'-0001/PDR 91-0001). A Planned Development Overlay designation has been applied to this tax lot as a reault of that application. A subsequent development plan (Hart/fl naissance SUB 92-0003) was approved for a portion of the original proposal. No other applications have been considered on this site. 3. -inat ion This site is bounded on the south by SW Wirth Deltota Street. A 50 fool- Wide private access drive is located to the east which provides access to a residence which is locate to the north, behind this proposed church site Propertie0 on all aides of this subject site are zoned R-4.5 (Regidential0 4.5 units per acre). In addition, the properties located to the north and Inuit also carry a P1'nned DeVelopment overlay designation. This area is generally developed .,A1 single family residences. Planning Commiallion Fihal Order 92-05 PC CUP 92-0002 / PDR 970-0004 tatter bay Saints eLark Page 1 4. Site Information and PmLallion Several wood framed structuree, including a single-family house, detached garage, shed and barn are located on the site. As noted by the applicant, several abandoned vehicles and appliances are also present at the site The land generally elopes downward from southwest to northeaut. Existing vegetation consists of grasses, weft, trees and blackberry buehes. Both the west central potion and the southeast corner of the site are wooded, primarily with native Douglas Fir. The remnant of orchard trees are located in the eouthwcst corner of the :Lite. There are also one or two water wells on the sit. The applicant proposes to construct a 17,000 equare foot church and 300 square foot storage building on this site. A parking lot which provides 176 spaces Le proposed to encircle the building on three sides with driveway access to SW North Dakota on each side of the church. The eite will be landscaped with ttees, shrubs, and grass, with street trees planted along the site's frontage on SW North Dakota Street. gl_Aggney_pinsLNPO Comments The City of Tigard Building Division has reviewed thin proposal and had offered the following comments: If any of the existing buildings are to be removed, a demolition permit will be required. The oeptic tank shall either be pumped out and filled in or completely removed. An inspection shall he obtained after the tank is filled or removed. A copy of the recelpt from the pumping company shall be provided. The applicant should be made aware that if the existing well Is t be abandoned, it should be properly capped-off as required by the State of Oregon Water Resourdes Department; (3850 Portland Road N.E., Salem, OR 97310. 378-8130) or the Washington County Watermaster (684-4645). Tualatin Valley Fire District #1 has reviewed this proposal and has offered the following comments: A fire hydrant is required within 250 feet of all portions of the etructure(s) measured around the outside and along access roadways. Fire flow exceeds 3,000 GPM (gallons per minute). The developer should either upgrade the construction, install area separation walls, or provide automatic sprinkler protection. Tigard Water Distrio t.. has reviewed this proposal and has offered the following comment: Ae with all developments, water main size and location, including water meters will be reviewed and approved through the Water District office. Final approval of fire hydrant location will be coordinated with Gene Birchen of Tualatin 'Valley Fire & Rescue with approval through the Water DiStrict. The City of Tigard Police Department, School District 2300 and Field Operations. Division, Portland General Electric, and Metro Area Communications have reviewed this proposal and have no objection to it. No other comments have been received. Planning Commission Final Order 92,-05 Pe CUP 92-0002 f PDR 92,-0004 Latter Day Saints \ Stark Page 2 • • ' - I ' • =AV • • t. C. Other Comments and Hearing_Tentiman The staff report was presented by Senior Planner Dick Bewersdorff. Oral testimony in favor of the appeal was presented by the firm of Lee-Ruff- Stark, Architects. Public testimony in opposition cr. the thin development was primarily centered around the issues of traffic, nuise, lighting. Specifically, NPO #7 requested that sight obscuring screening be placed around the perimeter of the site end that light barriers be placed in the parking area so arito block the infiltration of light into adjoining lots. A taped recording of the oral tesi:imony was made at the hearing. Minutes of the public hearing are being prepared at this time. II. APPLICABLE APPROVAL STANDARDS A. FINDINGS AND CONCLUSIONS Section 18.50.040 of the Code lists Religious Assembly as a Conditional Use in the R-4.5 zoning district. Section 18.130.040 of the Code contains the following general approval criteria for a Conditional Use: 1. The site size and dimensions provide: a. Adequate area for the needs of the proposed Use and b. Adequate area for aesthetic design treatrent to mitigate possible adverse effects from the use on surrounding properties and twee. 2. The characteristics of the site are ouitable for the proposed use considering size, hape, location, topography, and natural features. 3. A11 required public facilities have adequate capacity to serve the proposal. 4. The applicable requirements of the zoning district are met except as modified by this chapter. 5. The supplementary requirements set forth in Chapter 18.114 (SIGNS) and Section 18.120.180 (APPROVAL STANDARDS) Site Development Review, if applicable, are met. 6. The uee will comply with the applicable policies of the Comprehensive Plano The construction of a church in an R-4.5 zone and the creation of on-site parking for Religioukt Assembly mite req0ites a Conditienal Use approval. These usee are consistent with the above criteria. The Site provided adequate area for the construction of the propoeed church and related parking. There are no avparent physical obstacles to this use on the site. AdeqUate public Mtilities are available to Serve thie use. setbacks, lot coverage, and buildinq height requirements of the R-4.5 one, and the applicable Cdmprehensive Plan Policies shall be satisfied by this proposal. Section 18.130.150(C)(10) contains the following additional Conditional Use Criteria for Religious Assembly Use: Planning Commission Final Order 92-05 PC --- CUP 92-0002 /.PDR 92-0004 Latter bay Saints \ Stark Page 3 4. , 1 • • . fas •;• a. Lot Size: i. Minimum lot size shall be 20,000 square feet; b. Setbacks: i. The front yard setback shall be a minimum of 25 feet. ii. On corner lots and through lots, the setback shall be a minimum of 20 feet, plus meat visual clearance areas (Chapter 18.102); iii. The side yard setback shall be a minimum of 20 feet; iv. The rear yard setback obeli be a minimum of 20 feet; and V. Each setback shall be increased five feet for every 10 feet of building height over 45 feet. 4. The construction of the proposed church and related parking either meet or exceed all lot area and setback requirements as specified above. Section 18.50.50ail(41 states that the maximum building „height in an R-4.5 zone shall not exceed 30 feet in height. The proposed structure is approximately 19 feet tall at the highest average point of habitable space and therefore compliers with this height reetriction. Section 18.80.080 (Planned Development) states that the minimum lot size, lot depth, and lot width standards of the underlying zone shall not apply to a planned development except as related to the density computation. Building height requirements of the underlying zone shall not apply except within 100 feat an Established Area Front yard, side yard, and rear yard setbacks of the underlying zone shall not apply except on the perimeter of the site An applicant may request special setbacks to be applied to the development or the Planning Commission may establish special setbacks. The proposed setbacke are: front - 50 feet, aide yards - 20 feet and 32.5 feet, rear - 212 feet. Therefore, this proposal does not request for approval of any 'Adjustments tn the standards of the underlying R-4.5 zone. Additionally, it is noted in the purpose statement of the Planned Development code section that it is the intent of this section to preserve, to the greatest extent possible, the existing landscape features and amenities; through the use of site planning ptocedurea that relate the type and design of a development to the site The applicant's pre)iminaVy site plan indicates that a large number of existing trees will be preserved and incorporated into the landscaping. Thetefore, the intent of the Planned Development dode section has been served. Section 18.100.110 (screening: Spedial PtoVidiene) lieta the specifications fot providing ecreening for parking and loading &teas . the proposed landscaping plan indicates both existing and proposed plantingt4 Which Shall virtually encircle the petimoter of the parking area except on the east property line., this vegetation is required to achieve a relative balance between low lying ehrobbety and gronndeovets, and vertical hedges and trees, In addition tfathe existing trees which Shell be preserved, 27 new trees are proposed to be added to the parking atea, thiecode deletion requires that a minimum of 26 parking lot trees be provided for 176 parking spaces one treiti.ftik every seven spaces) i The 27 new tritos0'plus the quieting treed which are to be preserved, surpass the number of parking lot trees required for this development. Planning Commission Final Order 92,-0.5•.P.0 CUP 92-0002 t Pb R 92-0004 Latter Day Sainte \ Stark Page 4 7, '41 Section 18./00.030 requiree that all developments fronting on a public street or private driveway more than 100 feet in length shall be required to plant street trees in aocordance with Section 18.100.035 (Location of Street Trees). The minimum required spacing is 20 feet with a maximum spacing of 40 feet. The applicant proposes to plant oix street tree along the sites frontage on sw North Dakota in addition to retaining existing trees located on both sides of the eastern driveway. The spacing of these new treen is shown as approximat ly 35 feet. Only three trees are proposed for the east property line adjacent to the parking lot. The length of developing portion of this sits, approximately 325 feet, will require the planting of a minimum of eight trees. Therefore, the landscaping plan must be revised to demonstrate the provision of! five additional trees along the 'met property line of this development. Section 18.102.020 (Visual Clearance) requires that a visual clearance area be maietained along the intersectioue of all public and private right-ofewaye. This proposal will create two driveway accesees onto SW North Dakota. The applicant is proposing to retain the existing trees near the east driveway. Therefore these trees that are withia the vision clearance area shall be limbed up to eight feet in height to provide for adequate vision clearance for the driveway/right-of-way intersection. Therefore, this code section is satiofied. Section .18.10gAllaa1la1. (Parking) requires that ogle parking apace be provided for every Six fixed seats, or every 12 feet of bench length in the assembly area, or every 100 square feet of gross floor area in the assembly area where there are not permanent eeats, whichever is greater. The proposed meetinghouse contains approximately 6,804 square feet of assembly area. The assembly area calculation yields the greatest number of required parking spaces. By calculating the square footage of areas 157 through 165 (main sanctuary, three cultural rooms and two adjacent rooms), 68 parking spaces are required. The applicant proposes to provide 176 parking spaces. This code would permit up to 25% of the 176 proposed parking spaces (44 spaces) to be compact parking stalls. Additionally, the site plan rrovides for four disabled person parking spaces whereas the newly adopted ADA standards (Americans with Disabilities Act) requires the provision of six such parking stelae. Therefore, parking requirements have been satiefied with the exception of the number of disabled person parking stall. The Fate plan shall be revised to provide for nix such spaces. Bicycle parkitg requirements (Section. 18.106.020(jL) state that 1 bicycle parking space is requited for each 15 automobile parking spaces. Thee applidatt has not indicated the provision an any bicycle parking on that site plat. Therefore, the site plan shall be revised to provide for a Mitimunt of 12 bicycle parking speeds. Section 18.108.P50 requires that a pedestrian walkway extend from tho ground floor entratdee to the streets which provide the required addeso and egtessu The bite plan proposes two pedestrian walkways extending fit the Main entrance of the structure to SW North Dakota 8treet. Therefore, this cede requitement has been batiefied. Although not tegAired by the deft,- a pedestrian accessway Connecting the church to the property to the north should be considered Upon further development on this Sites This would provide neighborhood pedestrian access to the church Without obligating fUtUte neighborhood residents to drive to thin facility Section 184108.080 (Access and Circulation - Minimum Requirements) sates that if Mete that 100 parking spaces are required, the minimum access width shall be 30 feet with curbs and 24 feet of pavement width required 1f two access are provided. This current proposal is providing 116 Planning Commineion Final order 92-0S PC OOP 92-0002 / PDE 92e0004 Letter Day Saints \ Stark Page 5 ; parking spaces. Therefore; the required paved width for amass, egress and on-olte circulation shall be 24 feet. Au demonstrated on the mite plan, this proposal conforms to this code standard. Section Ifit114.1glialiell 1Signe) allows the placement of well, and freestanding signs on this site. An approximately 12 square foot ant sign is shown on the elevation drawings. A 32 square foot monument sign is permitted in this zone for non-residential use. Therefore,' this sign is an acceptable size. A sign permit shall be obtained prior to the installation of any sign on this premises. Section 1111110. lista he approval criteria for tree removal. A permit shall be applied for and obtained prior to removal of any trees having a trunk 6 inches or more in diameter four feet above the ground. A permit for tree removal must comply with the following criteria: a. The trees are diseased, present a danger to property, or interfere with utility service or traffic safety; b. The trees have to be removed to cone;ruct proposed improvements or to otherwise utilize the applicant'a property in a seasonable manner; c. The trees are not needed to prevent erosion, inetability or drainage problems; d. The trees are not needed to protect nearby tre,s as windbreaks or as a desirable balance between shade and open space; e. The aesthetic character in the area will not be visually adversely affected by the tree removal; and f. New vegetation planted by the applicant, if any, will replace the aesthetic value of trees to be cut. Therefore, the applicant shall apply for and receive ouch a permit prior to any tree removal on this eite. Section 1144,220 Lgi (Minimum Rights-of-way and Street Widths) contains the regulations pertaining to street standards. Southwest North Dakota is clasaified as a minor collector. The standards for a minor collector are (all distances are from centerline): 30 feet of right-of-way, 20 feet of pavement, curb and sidewalk. Currently there is 20 feet of right-of-way, approximately 12 al4 feet of pavement, and no rurbe or sidewalks. Therefore, the applieant should be required to Oedicate additional right- of-way to 30 feet and provide for half street kApravements. Ptlic UtilityC2pcerna: Sections 18.164.090 (Sanitary Sewer), and 18.164.100 (Storm Drains) shall be satisfied ad specified below: 1. SANITARY SEWER': There is an existing 8 inch public line located in SW North Dakota that has the Capacity to accommodate this; development. The applicant is proposing to connect to this line. The applicant, or the applicant's engineer0'should verify both the location and depth of this line. 2. STORM SEWER: Planning Commission Final Order 92-05 PC CUP 92-0002 / PDR 92-0004 Latter Day Sainte \ stark Page 6 The site slopes from the northwest toteards the northeast. Currently there is no public: storm sewer eyetem available to serve this site. The applicant's engineer is performing an analysis to determine the most viable alternative. There appear to be two alternatives: 1. Instal/ a public system within 0/ North Dakota at a sufficient depth to serve the entire development. This would also require that the public line be exteeded to the epst so that it outfalle into an existing public syetemi or 2. Design the storm drainage system no the it would flow to the north and drain into the existing stream/pond. Thin would require that the applicant obtain storm drainage easements from two or three property owners to the north. It ehould be noted that the City recently approved a subdivision (SUB 92- 003) for one of the properties to the north and that thin may simplify the process. The applicant should contact the City Engineering Department to verify the statue of SUB 92-003. The apolicant should be required to install one of the two systems described above or provide an alternative which can be approved by the City Engineer. The Unified Sewerage Agency has established, and the City has agreed to enforce (Aeoolution and Order No. 91-47) Surface Water Management Regulations requiring the construction of on-site wetter quality facilities or fees in-lieu of their construction. Construction of an on-site water quality treatment facility is not appropriate in this instance because this site is small in comparison to the development plan, and the loss of area for the on-situ facility would preclude effective development. In addition, requiring surface wster quality facilities on small sites would result in numerous facilities that would become a maintenance burden to the City. Furthermore, the applicant has not proposed any such facilities nor are there any natural depressions or other areas. of this site that, are particularly suitable for a water quality facility. Regional facilities, funded by fees in-lieu of construction of these facilities, would provide the required treatment with improved reliability and, less maintenance. Therefore the applicant should be required to pay the fee in-lieu of constructing an on-site water quality facility. Federal, State and local regulations all require erosion control 'permits for this project. The applicant should apply, through the City, for a joint permit. Application Should be made at the time that construction drawings are submitted. The proposed major modification complies with all applicable Comprehensive Plan Policies as follows: 1. Policy 2.1.1 is Satisfied because NPO 97 has been informed of the proposal and has been given an opportunity to comment On the proposal. In addition, notice of the public hearing and the opportunity to comment on the proposal has been bent to nearby property owners. The site has been posted with a Sign noting that a land use develOpMent application in pending or this property. Public testimony regarding the pLoposal was received and duly considered at the Planning CoMadeeion'e AUghet 17, 1992 hearing. 2. Policy 4:2.1 provides that all development within the Tigard urban Planning Area "hail comply With applicable federal, °tete, and regional water quality standards. In order to comply with this Policy, a condition is warranted to require the applicant to sUbMit an erosion control plan Planning Commission Final Order 92-0S PC CUP 92-0002 t PDA 92-0004 Latter Day Saints \ Stark Page 7 ensuring compliance with erosion control standards for the Tualatin River Basin, as part of the grading permit application. 3. Policies 7.1.2, 7.3.1 and 7.4.4 provide that the City will require as a condition of development approval that public water, sewer, and storm drainage will be provided and designed to City standards and utilities placed underground. This conditional use permit proposal complies with Policies 7.1.2, 7.3.1, and 7.4.4 because the applicant will extend public sewer and water systems to this site and will provide for underground installation of telephone, electricity, and cable television lines. Additionally, the City will assist in the coordination of the provision of water services with Tigard Water District. 4. Policy 8.1.1 provides that the City will plan for a safe and efficient street and roadway system that meets current needs and anticipated future growth and development. Also, Policy 8.1.3 provides the City will require as precondition of approval that: a. Development abuts a dedicated street or has other adequate access; b. Street right-of-way shall be dedicated where the street is substandard in width; a. The developer shall commit to construction of the streets, curbs and sidewalks to City standards within the development. d. The developer shall participate in the improvement o existing streets, curbs, and sidewalks te the extent of the development's impacts; e. Street improvements shall be made and street signs or signals shall be provided when the development is found to create or intensify a traffic hazard. This application complies with Policies 8.1.1 and 8.1.3 because the proposed improvements to the public street adjoining this site will be consistent with City of Tigard road improvement standards. III. CONCLUSION 4f. It is agreed that this proposal will promote the general welfare of the City and will not be significantly detrimental nor injurious to ourrounding land uses, provided development that occurs complies with applicable local, state and federal laws. Therefore, the Planning Commission hereby APPROVES conditional Use Permit CUP 92- 00022 / PDR 92e0004 regarding tax lot 300 of WCTM 1S1 34DB SUBJECT TO THE CONDITIONS WHICH FOLLOW: THE FOLLOWING CONDITIONS SHOULD BE MET PRIOR TO THE ISSUANCE OF BUILDING PERMITS, UNLESS OTHERWISE NOTED, THE STAFF CONTACT FOR ALL CONDITIONS SHALL BE CHRIS DAVIES, ENGINEERING DIVISION: 1. The Iandecaping/dito plan shall be revised to provide for a minimum of six disabled person parking spaces, 12 bicycle parking Spaces, and eight parking lot trees along the east property line. STAFF CONTACT: Ron Pomeroy, Planning DJ:Anion. Planning Commission Final Order 92-06 PC CUP 92-0002 / PDR 92-0004 Latter Day saints \ Stark Page 8 IBC 2. A tree removal .hermit shall be obtained pr, for to the real of any tgeee on the oite q r:iater than six inches in diameter when measure r8 d four feet ; Above grade. STAFF CONTACT: Victor donri, Planning . 3. Additional right-of-way ®hall be dedicated to the Public *long the SW North Dakota Street frontage to increase the right Y feet the centerline. The description shall be tied to the existin ► right-of- way centerline. The dedication document shall be on City fors; instructions are available from the Engineering Department. 4. The applicant shall be required to provide half-street Dal te for ng SW North Dakota Street meeting minor collector street standard frontage of the site. An a minimum, half - street improvements shall include, traffic control devices, con�eratli hts, a8nd, un a ground3 gto! concrete pavement, storm drainage, of g utilities. 6. Two (2) sets of detailed public improvement plane and profile construction drawings shall be submitted for preliminary review to the Engineering Department. Seven (7) eats of approved drawings and one (1) itemized construction cost estimate, all prepared by a Professional n inee , haln be submitted for final review and approval addition to any drawings required by the !handing Division, and should only include sheets relevant to public improvements.) ) 6. An erosion control plan shall be a ovid to "Erosion of the he public improvement drawingo. The plan shall Technical Guidance Handbook, November 1989." 7. P tuction the proposed public improvements and issuance of Building er of Permits shall not commence until after the Engineering Department has plans, a street opening and approved the public improvements permit ion compliance agreements has been executed, execution emit or construction of a developer - engineer agreement and payment of all permit feeae e 8. The applicant shall provide a storm drainage eyatem that meet® the minimum standards and it shall be approved by the City Engineer. 9. Ste., .d drainage details shall be provided as part of the public improvement of the store: drainage basin glans. Calculations and a topographic map o- service area shall be provided as a supplement to the publid improvement plans. Calcu atione shall be based on full develo went of the serviceable area. Th e location and capacity p of oxi.eting, proposodr and future lines shall be addressed. 8. The aipicao shall install a water quality facilit y under thg guidelines of Unified Se 'forage Agency Reeoluti and Order No. 91-47. Alternatively, may Waive this requirement to the extent allot by the City Engineering the regulations of the Environmental Quality �i ®:►ion and Unified Sewerage Ageney as they exist at the time the Public Improvement Plans are approved. 9. As plane applicant p i ant shall; apply for and - iic peovid of the neceedary infernnation to Obtain " int Permit" for erosion control. 10 All plane for water syntom and fire hydrante shall be coordinated through, Y ... and approved by e Tig ard water District. CONTACT: TIOARD WATER +ISTRICT (639- 1.55 �h 4). CUP / #rPDRo92 -0004 Order bey Saints \ Stark Page 9 P 11. If any of the existing buildings are to b removed° a demolition permit ehall be required. The septic tank shall either be pumped out filled in or completely roved. An inspection shall be obtained after the tank is filled or removed. A copy of the receipt rom the pumping company shall be provided. STAFF CONTACT: Brad Roast, Building Division. PR/O TO THE ISSUANCE OF AN OCCUPANCY PERMIT, THE FOLLOWING COND/TIONS SHALL BE SATIMIED: 12. All landscape materiale ehall be installed as per the approved site plan. STAFF CONTACT: Ron Pomeroy, Planning DiVision, 639-4171. 13. Sign permits are repaired and shall be obtained prior to the installation of any sign on the site. STAFF CONTACT: Victor Adonri, Planning Division, (639-4171). There shall be AO parking of construction vehicles on the public right-of- way during any portion of the ccnstruction of this facility. STAFF CONTACT: Chrie Davies, Engineerizig Department, 639-4171. THIS APPROVAL IS VALID 7,0 EXERCISED WITHIN EIGHTEEN MONTHS OF THE EFFECTIVE DATE OF THIS DECISXON. It Le further ordered that the applicant be notified of the entry of this order. t PASSED: This IL day of August, 1992, by the Planning Commission of the city Of Tigard, 0 ' p Planning Commission Final Order 92-06 PC CUP 92-0002 / PDR 92-0004 Latter Day Sainte) \ stark Page 10 LEGIBILITY STRIP 2.W. BOXWOOD. CT. OIC NOTICE OF DECISION CITY OF TIGARD, OREGON TO: Interested Parties FROM: Dick Bewersdorff, Senior Planner DATE: May 13, 1992 SUBJECT: Modification of Conditions of Approval for Tigard Christian Ministries Shelter, Conditional Use CU 89 -03 On June 28, 1989, the City of Tigard's Land Use Hearings Officer approved a conditional use request from Tigard Christian Ministries to operate a seasonal homeless shelter at the Tigard Methodist Church at 9845 SW Walnut Place. Condition of approval #1 of the Hearings officer's decision limited the period of operations for the shelter to between October 1st through March 31st. Kimberly Almos- Brown, Tigard Christian Ministries shelter director, has requested a modification of this condition of approval to allow the shelter to operate until April 30th each year. Ms. Almos - Brown's request letter is attached. The Planning Division has determined that this request does not constitute a major modification to an approved conditional use as specified by Community Development Code Section 18.130.050 and therefore does not require that a new conditional use hearing be held. This request would therefore be a minor modification to an approved plan which may be approved by the Planning Division upon a finding that the proposed change would not violate any Code requirements. Since the schedule for operation of a homeless shelter is not specified by the Community Development Code, and in this case was simply a matter of the hearings officer specifying the schedule originally proposed by the applicants and was not an issue at the original public hearing, the Planning Division concludes that the request to modify the operating schedule for the shelter will not violate any Code provisions. Condition of approval #1 of the decision for Conditional Use CU 89 -03 is hereby amended as follows: 1. The months of operation of the shelter are limited to October 1 through April 30 each year. This decision may be appealed as specified by Code Section 18.32.120. 1 RECEIVED PLANNING MAY 6 6 1992 / Tigard Christian Ministries Shelter Kimberly D. Almos -Brown P.O. Box 230821 Tigard OR 97281 V ic k Bewersborff enior Planner ity Of Tigard P.O. Box 23397 Tigard OR 97223 Mr. Bewersborff, The T.C.M. Shelter would like to request a change in conditions of approval o conditional use number CU8903 to seven months with operation of the shelter en ding approximately April 30th. Based on the needs of the homeless people in Washington county as well as the increasing numbers of volunteers wanting to work at the shelter we would like to extend our year of operation from six to seven months. We believe this extension well help us serve our community better by meeting the needs of the homeless for an extra month as well as giving the opportunity for volunteers to serve. Thank you for your time and consideration. If you have any questions please feel free to contact me at my office 598 -0359. Sincerely, -1r (u te-t, _) Kimberly! y Almos -Brown T.C.M. Shelter Director ;*t• ; . • 4. „ • .4) ,„ .4 JOHN STARK LEE-RUFF-STARK ARCHITECTS 5285 SW MEADOW ROAD t 340 LAKE OSWEGO OR 97035 CHURCH OF JESUS CHRIST OF LATTER-DAY SAINTS 50 E NORTH TEMPLE ST SALT LAKE CITY UT 84150 CAL WOOLERY 12356 SW 132ND CT TIGARD OR 97223 JAMES A JONES 9967 SW COQUILLE TUALATIN OR 97062 EDITH CARNAHAN 10985 SW NORTH DAKOTA TIGARD OR 97223 , JUDITH 8 GOULD 10995 SW NORTH DAKOTA TIGARD OR 97223 • • tto 'ttt , 411 AGENDA ITEM 5.2 STAFF REPORT TO THE PLANNING COMMISSION AUGUST 17, 1992 - 7:30 PM T/GARD CITY HALL - TOWN HALL 13125 SW HALL BLVD. TIGARD, OREGON 97223 A. FACTS. 1. General Information CASE: CONDITIONAL USE CUP 92-0002 PLANNED DEVELOPMENT REVIEW PDR 92-0004 COMPREHENSIVE PLAN DESIGNATION* Low Density Residential ZONING DESIGNATION: R-4.5 (Residential, 4.5 units per acre, Planned Developmant). LOCATION: 11065 SW North Dakota Street (WCTM 151 34DB, tax lot 300) OWNER: Church of Jesus Christ of Latter-Day Saints 50 E. North Temple Street Salt Lake City, UT 84150 APPLICANT: John Stark LaeRuff-Stark Architects 5285 SW Meadows Road, #340 Lake Oswego, OR 97305 APPLICABLE LAW: Community Development Code Chapters 18.50.040, 18.50.050(A)(4), 18.80.080, 10.100.0300 18.100.035, 18.100.110, 18.102.020, 18.106.020(P), 1e.106.030(B)(9), 18.108.0500 18.108.080, 18.114.130(A)(4), 18.130.040, 18.130.150(C)(10), 18.150.030, 18.164.030(E), 18.164.090, 18.164.100, and comprehensive Plan Policy 2.1.1, 4.2.1, 7.1.2, 7.3.1, 7.4.4 and 8.1.3. 2. AlghgrgAULIgilaf5t.1211 This Bite was included ag pert of a previous subdivision/Planned development review in 1991 (Hart/Venture SUB 91-0001/PDA 91-0001). A Planned Development overlay designation has been applied to this tax lot as a result of that application. A subsequent development plan (Hart/Renaiddance SUB 92-0003) was approved for a portion of the original proposal. No other appliCationfl have been considered on this site. 3. VicinitvInformatiOn This site is bounded on the South by SW North Dakota Street. A 50 foot wide private access drive is located to the east which provides access to a tedidence which is located to the north, behind this propoand church diteo Properties on all bided of thin duircot alto are zoned R.-4.5 (Residential, 4.5 units Per acre). In addition, the properties located to the north and east also cat y a Planned DeVel**ment Overlay designation. This area is generally developed With Single family reeidendett. 4. Site IntbkmatibgggligEgAigg..11.006t414.410, several wood framed otructured, including a dingle-family house, detached garage, shed and ban are located on tne bite. AB noted by the applicht, several. abandoned vehicle° and appliances are also present at the elite. The land generally slopes downward from southwest to northeast. EXidting • A vegetation consists of grasses, weeds, teen and blackberry bushes. Both the west central portion and the eoutheaot corner of the site are wooded, primarily with native Douglas rir. The remnants of orchard trees are located in the southwest corner of the site. There are also one or two water wells on the site. The applicant proposes to construct a 17,000 square foot church and 300 square foot storage building on this mite. A parhing lot which provides 176 spaces is proposed to encircle the building on three sides with driveway access to SW North Dakota on each side of the church. The site will, be landscaped with trees, phrubse and grass, with street treat; planted along the site's frontaqe on SW North Dakota Street. The City of Tigard Building Division has reviewed this proposal and has offered the following comments: If any of the existing buildings are to be removed, a demolition permit will be required. The septic tank shall either be pumped out and filled in or completely removed. An inspection shall be obtained after the tank is filled or removed. A copy of the receipt from the pumping company shall be provided. The applicant should be made aware that if the existing well is to be abandoned, it should be properly capped-off as required by the State of Oregon Water Resources Department (3850 Portland Road N.E., Salem, OR 97310. 378-8130) or the Washington County Watermaster (684-4645). Tualatin Valley Fire District 01 has reviewed this proposal and has offered the following comments: A fire hydrant is required within 250 feet of all portions of the structure(s) measured around the outside and along access roadways. Fire flow exceeds 3,000 GPM (gallons pet Amite), The developer should either upgrade the construction, inetall area separation walls, cr provide automatic sprinkler protection. Tigard Water District has reviewed this proposal and has offered the fallowing comment: As with all developments, water main size and location, including water meters will be reviewed and approved through the Water District office. Final approval of fire hydrant location will be coordinated with Gene Birchen of Tualatin Valley Fire & Rescue with approval through the Water District. The City of Tigard Police Department, SchoOl District 23, and Field operations Divibion, Portland General Electric, and Metre Area communications have reviewed this proposal and have no objection to it. Uo other comments have been received. d. FINDiNGS AND CONCLUSIONS Soction 18.50.040 o& the Code lists Religious Assembly an a Conditional Use in the R-4.5 zoning distriet. Section 22.130.040 of the Code contains the following general approval criteria for a conditional Use: STAFF AAPORTTITUP41-866! PlEgTfterAilraigAggRUFF-STARK ARCH. PAGE 2 a. Adequate area for the needs of the proposed use; and b. Adequate area for aesthetic design treatment to mitigate possible adveroe effects from the use on surrounding properties and Immo. 2. The characteristics of the site are suitable for the proposed use considering size, shape, location, topography, and natural features. 3. All required public facilities have adequate capacity to serve the proposal. 4. The applicable requirements of the zoning district are met except as modified by Lids chapter. 5. The supplementary requirements set forth in Chapter 18,114 (SIGNS) and Section 18.120.180 (APPROVAL STANDARDS) Site Development Review, if applicable, are met. 6. The use will comply with the applicable policies of the Comprehensiro Plan. The construction of a church in an R-4.5 zone and the creation of on-site parking for Religious Assembly use requires a Conditional Use approval. These uses are consistered with the above criteria. The site provides adequate area for the construction of the proposed church and related parking. There are no apparent physical obstacles to this use on the site. Adequate public utilities are available to serve this use. Setbacks, lot coverage, and building height requirements of the R-4.5 zone, and the applicable Comprehensive Plan Policies shall be satisfied by this proposal. Section 18.130.150(c1(10) contains the following additional Conditional Use criteria for Religious Assetably Use: a. Lot Size: i. Minimum lot size shall be 20,000 square feet; b. Setbacks: i. The front yard oetbaci sll be a minimum of 25 feet. ii. Oil corner lot O and through lots, the Setback str..."A be a minimum of 20 fest, rlus meet viEtual clearance areas (Chapter 18.102); ii. The bide yard setback shall be a ne'alimum of 20 feet; iv. The rear yard setback shall be a minimum of 20 feet; and V Each setback shall be increased fie feet for every 10 feet of building height ever 45 feet. The constriction of the proposed church and related parking either meet or exceed all lot area and setback requirements as specified above Section I8e.5gilga41(211 stated that the maximum building height in an R-4.5 Zone shall not exceed 30 feet in height, The propoSed structure is approximately 19 Zee& tall at the highest average point of habitable space and therefore complies with this height restriction. STAFF REPORT CUP 92-0002 LATTER DAV SAINTS/LEE-RUFF-4TARK ARCH. PAGE 3 0 4. 4' 1-0,•"4 , ° • Section 18.80.080 (Planned Development) states that the minimum lot size, lot depth, and lot width standards of the underlying zone shall not apply to a planned development except as related to the density computation. Building height requirements of the underlying on shall not apply except within /00 feet an Established Area. L'ront yard, side yard, and rear yard setbacks of the underlying zone shall not apply except on the perimeter of the site. An applicant may request special setbacks to be applied to the development or the Planning Commission may establish special setbacks. The proposed setbacks are: front - 50 feet, side yards - 20 feet and 32.5 feet, rear - 212 feet. Therefore, this proposal does not request for approval of any adjustments to the standards of the underlying R-4.5 zone. Additionally, it is noted in the purpose statement of the Planned Development code section that it is the intent of this section to preserve, to the greatest extent possible, the existing landscape features and amenities through the use of site planning procedures that relate the type and design of a development to the site. The applicant's preliminary site plan indicates that a large number of existing trees will be preserved and incorporated into the landscaping. Therefore, the intent of the Planned Development code nection has been served. Section 18.100.110 (Screening: Special • Provisions) lists the specifications for providing screening for parking and loading areas. The proposed landscaping plan indicates both existing and proposed plantings which shall virtually encircle the perimeter of the parking area except on the at property line. This vegetation is required to achieve a relative balance between low lying shrubbery and groundcovers, and vertical hedges and trees. In addition to the existing trees which shall be prese...ved, 27 new trees are proposed to be added to the parking area. This code section requires that a minimum of 26 parking lot trees be provided for 176 parking spaces (one tree or every seven spaces). The 27 new trees, plus the existing trees which are to be preserved, surpass the number of parking lot trees required for this development. Section 18,100.030 requires that all developments fronting on a public street or private driveway more than 100 feet in length shall be required to plant street trees in accordance with Section 18.100.035 (Location of Street Trees). The minimum required spacing is 25 feet with a maximum spacing of 40 feet. The applicant proposes to plant six street tree along the sites frontage on SW North Dakota in addition to retaining existinr trees located on both sides of the eastern driveway. The spacing of these new trees is shown as approximately 35 feet. Only throe trees are proposed for the east property line adjacent to the parking lot. The length of developing portion of tbis site, approximately 325 feet, will require the planting of a minimum of eight trees. Therefore, the landscaping plan must be revised to demonstrate the provision of five additional trees along the east property line of this development. Section 18.102.020 (Visual Clearance) requires that a visual clearance area be maintained along the intersections of all public and private right-of .qays. This proposal will create two driveway accesses onto SW North Dakota. The applicant is proposing to retain the existing trees near the east driveway. Therefore these trees that are within the vision clearance area shall be limbed up to eight feet in height to provide for adequate vision clearance for the driveway/right-of-way intersection. Therefore, this code section 10 satisfied. Section 4111LIE1011111 iParking) requires that one parking space be • provided for every six fixed Beata, or every 12 feet of bench length in the assembly akea, or every 100 square feet of gross floor area in the assembly area where there are not permanent seats, whichever is greater. The proposed meetinghouse contains approximately 6,804 square feet of STAPP REPORT CUP 92-0002 LATTER DAY SA/NTOLER-RUFF-STARK ARCH. PAGE 4 • 41. ' • ' lJ assembly area. The assembly area calculation yields the greatest number of required parking spaces. By calculating the square footage of areas 157 through 165 (main sanctuary, three cultural rooms and two adjacent room,), 68 parking spaces are required. The applicant proposes to provide 176 parking spaces. This code would permit up to 25% of the 176 proposed parking spaces (44 spaces) to be compact parking stalls. Additionally, the site plan provides for our disabled person parking spaces whereas the newly adOpted ADA standards (Americana with Disabilities Act) requires the provision of six such parking stalls. Therefore, parking requirements have been satisfied with the exception of the number of disabled person parking stall. The site plan ehall be revised to provide for six such spaces. Bicycle parking requirements (figetlemellelg&Anal) states that 1 bicycle parking space is required for each 15 automobile parking spaces. The applicant has not indicated the provision an any bicycle parking on the site plan. Therefore, the site plan shall be revised to provide for a minimum of 12 bicycle parking spaces. Section 18.108.050 requires that a pedestrian walkway extend from the ground floor entrances to the streets which provide the required accede and egrepe. The site plan proposes two pedestrian walkways eutending from the main entrance of the structure to SW North Dakota Street. Therefore, this code requirement has been satisfied. Although not required by the code, a pedestrian accesesway connecting the church to the property to the north should be considered upon further development on this site This would provide neighborhood pedertrian access to the church without obligating future neighborhood residents to drive to this facility. Section 18.108.080 (Access and Circulation e Minimum Requirements) states that if more that 100 parking spaces are required, the minimum access width shall be 30 fest with curbs and 24 feet of pavement width requered if two access are provided. This current propodal is providing 176 parking apices. Therefore, the required paved width for access, egress and on-site circulation shall be 24 feet. As demonstrated on the site plan, this propoeal conforms to this code standard. Section 1114.11/2.1201&1141 (Signe) allows the placement of wall, and freestanding signs on this site An approxiMately 12 square foot monument sign in ohown on the elevation drawings. A 32 square foot monument sign is permitted in this Zone for non-residential use Therefore, this sign iv an acceptable size. A sign permit shall be obtained prior to the installation of any sign on this premises. Section 18.150 lists the approval criteria for tree removal. A permit shall be applied for and obtained prior to removal of any trees having a trunk 6 inches or more in diameter four feet above the ground. A permit for tree removal must comply with the following criteria: a. The trees are diseaeed, present a danger to property, or interfere with utility service or traffic safety; b. The trees have to be removed to construct proposed Improvements or to otherwise utilize the applicant's property in a reasonable Manner; C. The trees are not needed to prevent erosion, instability, or drainage problems; d. The trees are not needed to protect nearby trees as Windbreaks or as a desirable balance between shade and opera Space; STAV10 REPORT CUP 92-0002 LATTER DAY SAINTS/LEE-RUPP-STARK ARCH. PAGE 5 • e. The aesthetic character in the area will not be visually adversely affected by the tree removal; and f. New vegetation planted by the app: &cont p if any, will replace the aesthetic value of trees to be gut. Therefore, the applicant shall apply for and receive such a permit prior to any tree removal on this site. Section 18.164 030(AI (Minimum Rights -of -way and Street Widths) contains the regulations pertaining to street standards. Southwest North Dakota is classified as a minor collector. The standards for a minor collector wall (all distances are from centerline): 30 feet of night -og -way, 20 fetilt of pavement, curb and sidewalk. Currently there is 20 feet of right: -of -way, approximately 12 -14 feet of pavement, and no curbs or sidewalks. Therefore, the applicant should be required to dedicate additional right- of-way to 30 feet and provide for half street improvements. Public. Utility.Concerns: Sections /8.164.090 (Sanitary Sewer), and 18.164.100 (Storm Drains) shall be satisfied as specified below: 1. 8ANXTARY SEWER: There is an existing 8 inch public lane located in SW North Dakota that has the capacity to accoLmcdate this development. The applicant is proposing to connect to this line The .applicant, or the applicant's engineer, should verify both the location and depth of this line. 2. STORM SEWER: The site slopes from the northwest towards the northeast. Currently there public is no p lic storm sewer system available to serve this site The applicant's engineer is performing an analysis to determine the most viable alternative. Based upon Engineering review of the site and surrounding area, there appears to be two alternatives: 1 Instal �o serve the system within SW North Dakota at a sufficient, a public depth entire development. This would also require that the public line be extended to the east so that it outfalls into an existing public system; or 2: Design the storm drainage system so the it would flow to the north and drain into the existing stream/pond. This would require that the applicant obtain storm drainage easements from twci or three property owners to the north. It should be city recently approved a subdivision (SUB 92- noted d that one of the the properties and this may simplify the process. The applicant should ontact the City Engineering Department to verify the status of SUB 92 -003. The applicant should be required to install one Of the two systems described above or provide an alternative which can be approved by the City Engineer. The Unified Sewerage Agency eetabliehed, and the City had agreed to enforce (Resolution and Order No 91 -41) Surface Water Management Regulations requiring the constru n ctio of on -Elite water quality facilitied or feed in -lieu of their construction. Conatruc'tion of an on -site Water quality treatment facility is not appropriate in this instance because this site is small in comparison to the development plan, and the loss of thin' REPORT CUP 92 -0002 LATER DAY ..SAINTS /LEE- RUFF -STS ARCH. PAGE 6 area for the on-site facility would preclude effective development. In addition, requiring surface water quality facilities on small site would result in numerous facilities that would become a maintenance burden to the City. Furthermore, the applicant has not proposed any such facilities nor are there any natural depressions or other areas of thia site that are particularly suitable for a water quality facility. Regional facilities, funded by fees in-lieu of construction of these facilities, would provide the required treatment with improved reliability and less maintenance. Therefore the applicant should be required to pay the fee in-lieu of constructing an on-site water quality facility. Federal, State and local regulations all require erosion control permits for this project. The applicant should apply, through the City, for a joint permit. Application should be made at the time that construction drawings are submitted. The proposed major modification complies with all applicable Comprehensive Plan Policies as follotem: 1. Policy 2.1.1 is satisfied because NIva #7 has been informed of the proposal and has been given an opportunity to comment on the proposal. In addition, notice of the public hearing and the opportunity to comment on the proposal has been sent to nearby property owners. The site has been posted with a sign noting that a land use development application is pending for this property. Public testimony regarding the proposal was received and duly considered at the Planning Commission's August 17, 1992 hearing. 2 Policy 4.2.1 provides that all development within the Tigard Urban Planning Area shall comply with applicable federal, state, and regional water quality standards. In order to comply with this Policy, a condition is warranted to require the applicant to submit an erosion control plan ensuring compliance with erosion control standards for the Tualatin River Basin, as part of the grading permit application. 3. Policies 7,1.2, 7,3.1 and 7.4.4 provide that the City will require as a condition of development approval that public water, sewer, and storm drainage Will be provided and designed to City standard') and utilities placed underground. This conditional use permit proposal complies with Policiee 7.1.2, 7.3.1, and 7.4.4 because the applicant will extend public sewer and water systems to this site and will provide for underground installation of telephone, electricity, and cable television lines. Additionally, the City will assist in the coordination of the provision of water services with Tigard Water Dieitrict. 4 Policy 8.1.1 providee that the City will plan for a safe and efficient street and roadway system that meets current heed!) and anticipated future growth and development. Alto, Policy 8.1.3 provides the City will require as a precondition of approval that: a. Development abate a dedicated street or has other adequate access; b. street right-of-way shall be dedicated where the street is substandard in width; c The developer shall commit to construction of the attests, curbs and sidewalks to City standards withtn the development: d. The developer shall participate in the improvement of existing streets, curbs, and sidewalks to the extent of the develOpment's impacts; STAFF REPORT CUP 92-0002 LATTER DAY SAINTS/LEE-RUFF-STARE ARCH. PAGE e. Street improvements shall be made and street signs or signals shall be provided when the development is found to create or intensify a traffic hazard, This application complies with Policies 8,1.1 and 8.1.3 because the proposed improvements to the public street adjoining this site will be consistent with City of Tigard road improvement standards. III. CONCLUSION It is concluded that this proposed application will promote the general welfare of the City and will not be significantly detrimental nor injurious to surrounding land uses, provided development that occurs complies with applicable local, state and federal laws. Therefore, it is recommended that the City of Tigard Planning Commission hereby APPROVE Conditional Use Permit CUP 92-00022 / PDR 92-0004 regarding tax lot 300 of WCTM 151 34DB SUBJECT TO THE CONDITIONS WHICH FOLLOW: THE FOLLOWING CONDMONS SHOULD BE MET PRIOR TO THE ISSUANCE OF BUILDING PERUITS. UNLESS OTHERWISA NOTED, THE STAFF CONTACT FOR ALL CONDITIONS SHALL BE CHRIS DAVIES, ENGINEERING DIVISION: 1. The landscaping/site plan shall be revised to provide for a minimum of six disabled person parking spaces, 12 bicycle parking spaces, and eight parking lot trees along the east property line. STAFF CONTACT t Ron Pomeroy, Planning Division. 2. A tree removal permit shall be obtained prior to the removal of any trees on the site greater than six inches in diameter when measured four feet above grade. STAFF CONTACT: Victor Adonri, Planning Division. 3. Additional right-of-way shall be dedicated to the Public along the SW North Dakota Street frontage to increase the right-of-way, to 30 feet from the centerline. The description shall be tied to the existing right-of- way centerline. The dedication document shall be on City forms instructions are available from the Zngineering Department. 4. The applicant shall be required to provide half-.street improvements for SW North Dakota Street meeting minor collector street standards, along the frontage of the site. As a minimum, half-street improvements ehall include, traffic control devices, concrete sidewalks, curbd, asphaltic concrete pavement, storm drainage, streetlights, and undergrounding of utilitie0. A 4 Two (2) sets of detailed public improvement plane and profile construction drawings shall be submitted for preliminary review to the Engineering Department. Seven (7) sets of approved drawings and one (1) itemized construction cost estimate, all prepared by a Professional Engineer, shall be submitted for final review and approval. (NOTE: these plena are in addition to any drawings required by the Building Division and Should only include sheets relevant to public improvements.) 6. An erosion control plan shall be provided as part of the public improvement drawings. The plan Shall conform tJ "Erosion Control Plans - Tedhnical Guidance Handbook, November 1989." 1, Construction of the proposed public improvements and issuance of Building Permits shall not commence Until after the Engineering Department has reviewed and approved the public improvements plans, a Street opening STAFF REPORT CUP 92-0002 LATTER DAY SAINTS/LEE-RUFF-STARK ARCH. PAGE 8 A .1 permit or construction compliance agreements has been executed, execution of a developer-engineer agreement and payment of all permit fees. 8. The applicant shall provide a storm drainage system that meets the minimum standards and it shall he approved by the City Engineer. 9. Storm drainage details shall be provided as part of the public improvement plans. Calculations and a topographic map of the storm drainage baein service area shall be provided as a supplement to the public improvement plans. Calculations shall be based on full development of the serviceable area. The location and capacity of existing, proposed, and future lingo shall be addrenSed. 8. The applicant (shall install a water quality facility under the guidelines of Unified Sewerage Agency Reeolution and Order No. 91-47. Alternatively, the City Engineering may waive this requirement to the extent allowed by the regulations of the Environmental Quality Commission and Unified Sewerage Agency an they exist at the time the Public Improvement Plans are approved. 9. As part of the public improvement plans the applicant shall apply for and provide the necessary information to obtain a "Joint Permit" for erosion control. 10. All plans for water system and fire hydrants shall be coordinated through, and approved by the Tigard Water District. CONTACT: TIGARD WATER DISTRICT (639-1554). 11. Fire hydrants are required within 250 feet of all portions of the structure(s) measured around the outside and along acceasways. Building construction must be upgraded or automatic sprinkler protection must bh provided. STAFF CONTACT Gene Birchellr FIRE DISTRICT #1 (256-2502). 1 . If any of the existing buildings are to be removed, a demolition permit shall be required. The septic tank shall either be pumped out filled in or completely removed. An inspection shall be obtained after the tank is filled or removed. A copy of the receipt from the pumping company shall be provided. STAFF CONTACT: Brad Roast, Building Division. PRIOR TO THE ISSUANCE OF AN OCCUPANCY PERMIT, THE FOLLOWING CONDITIONS SHALL BE SATISFIED: 12. All landscape materials Shall be installed as per the approved site plan. STAFF CONTACT; Ron Pomeroy, Planning Division, 639-4171. 13. Sign permits are ::ietquired and shall be obtained prior to the installation of any sign on the site. STAFF CONTACT: Victor Adonri, Planning Division, (639-4171). THIS APPROVAL IS VALID IF EXERCISED WITHIN EIGHTEEN MONTHS OF THE EFFECTIVE DATE OF THIS DECISION. 44" , Li Approved by: Dick Hewer rff Senior P1 nner 7.9 Date STAFF REPORT CUP 92-0002 LATTHR'DAY SAINTS/LEE-eAUFF,-STARK ARCH. PAGE 9 ;fr • '" • • tt r . , . 44, 41. • • 44" h S.W. BoxWooD Cr. • RECEIVEP NANNING AUG 11 1992 REQUEST FOR COMMENTS TO: '. 1, r' ! ; .� �',r �.J`„c DATE: July 23 1992! FROM: Tigard nanning Department RE: CONDITIONAL. USE PERMIT CUP 92 -0002 PLANNED DEVELOPMENT PDR 92-0004 LATTER-DAY SAINTS/STARK (NPO #7) A request fon Conditional Use Planned Development conceptual plan approval to construct a church building of approximately 17,000 square feet and a storage building of approximately 300 square feet with a related offs- street parking development. APPLICABLE REVIEW CRITERIA: Community Development Code Chapters 18.50, 18.96, 18.98, 18.100, 18.102, 18.106, 18.108, and 18.130. LOCATION: . 11065 SW North Dakota Street (WCTM 1S1 34DB, tax lot 300) ZONE: R -4.5 (PD) (Residential, 4.6 units /acre, Planned Development) The R--4.5 zone allows single family residential units, public support facilities, residential treatment homes, farming, temporary uses, and accessory structures among other, uses. Attached is the Site Plan and applicant's statement for your review. From information supplied by various departments and agencies and from other information available to our staff, a report and recot,mendation will be prepared and a decision will be rendered on the proposal in the near future. If you wish to comment on this application, we need your comments by Au ._3, 1992. You may use the space provided below or attach & separate letter to return your comments. I „you are unable to respond by the above date, please phone the staff contact noted below with your comments and confirm your comments in writing ae soon as possible. If you have any questions regarding this matter, contact the Tigard Planning Department, PO Box 23397, 13125 SW Hall Blvd., Tigard, OR 97223. PHONE: 639- 41.71. STAFF CONTACT: Jerry Offer, PLEASE CHECK THE FOLLOWING ITEMS THAT APPLY: We have reviewed the proposal and have no objections to it. Please contact of our office. Please refer to the enclosed letter. Written Comments: Name of Person Commenting: Phone Nucriber: Logo, 224 bkm /CUP92- 02:BKM 44 44 TO: FROM: Tigard Planning Department RE: CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT CUP 92-0002 PLANNED DEVELOPMENT PDR 92-0004 LATTER-DAY SA/NTURTaK (NPO #7) A request for Conditional Use/Planned Development conceptual plan approval to construct a church building of approximately 17,000 cquare feat and a storage building of approximately 300 square feet with a related off-street parking development. APPLICABLE REVIEW CRITERIA: Community Development Code Chapters 18.50, 18.96, 18.98, 18.100, 18.102, 18.106, 18.108, and 18.130. LOCATION: 11065 SW North Dakota Street (WCTM 161 34DB, tax lot 300) ZONE: R-4.5 (PD) (Residential, 4.5 units/acre, Planned DevelopMent) The R-4.5 zone allows single family residential units, public support facilities, residential treatment homes, farming # temporary uses, and accessory structures among other uses. Attached is the Site Plan and applicrnt's statement for your review. From information supplied by various departments and agencies and from other information available to our staff, a report and recommendation will be prepared and a decision will be rendered on the proposal in the near futhre. If you wish to Comment on this application, we need your comments by Aug. 3, 1992. You may use the space provided below or attach a separate letter to return your comments. IlLiamagglaft_tosomnd by the above date, please phone the staff contact noted below with your comments and confirm your comments in writing as soon as possible. If you have any questions regarding this Matter, contact the Tigard Planning Department, PO Box 23397, 13125 SW Hall Blvd., Tigard, CR 97223. PHONE: 639-4171. REQUEST FOR COMMENTS DATE: _Igly_22_1992 STAFF CONTACT: JerrOffer PLEASE CHECK THE FOLLOWING ITEMS THAT APPLY: We have reviewed the proposal and have no objections to it. Please contact of our office. Please refer to the enclosed letter. Written Comments: Name of Person commenting: Phone Number: _)&443_- bkm/CUP92-02 .BKM .41 TO: Jerry Offer August 5, 192 FROM: Chris Davies, Development Review Engineer M. RE: CUP 92-0002 - LATTER-DAY SAINTS/STARK it ion: The applicant proposes to construct a new church building of approximately 17,000 square feet with other improvements. glithiUME: 1. STREETS: The site is located on the north side of S.W. North Dakota between S.W. 109th and 115th Ave. S.W. North Dakota is classified as a minor collector. The standards for a minor collector are (all distances are from centerline): 30 feet of right-of-way, 20 feet of pavement, curb and sidewalk. Currently there is 20 feet of right-of-way, approximately 12-14 feet of pavement, and no curbs or sidewalks. Therefore, the applicant should be required to dedicate additional right-of-way to 30 feet and provide for half street improvements. 2. SANITARY SEWER: There is an existing 8 inch public line located in S.W. North Dakota that could serve this development. The applicant is proposing to connect to this line, The applicant or the applicnats' engineer should verify the location and depth of the line, 3. STORM SEWER: The site slopes towards the northeast. Currently there are no public storm sewer system available to serve the site. Based on the application the applicant's engineer is doing a analysis to determine the most viable alternative, Based Upon our review of the site and area there appears to be two alternatives: ENGINEERING COMMENTS: CUP 92-02 LATTER,-DAY SAINTS/STARK It 1. Install a public system within S.W. North Dakota at a sufficient depth to serve the entire development. This would also require that the public line be extended to the east so that it outfalls into a existing public system; or 2. Design the storm drainage system so the it would flow to the north and drain into the existing stream/pond. This would revire that the applicant obtain storm drainage easements from two ot three property owners to the north. It should be noted that the city recently approved a subdivision (SUB 92-003) for one of the properties to the north and that may simplify the process. The applicant should contact the City Engineering Department to verify the status of SUB 92-003. The applicant should be required to install one of the systems described above or an alternative approved by the City Engineer, The Unified Sewerage Agency has established and the City has agreed to enforce (Resolution and Order No. 91-47) Surface Water Management Regulations requiring the construction of on- site water quality facilities or fees in-lieu of their construction. Based on the size of the proposed development a water quality facility should be provided. Therefore the applicant should be required to construct a facility. Federal, State and local regulations all require erosion control permits for this project. The applicant should apply, through the City, for a joint permit. Application should be made at the time that construction drawings are submitted. Recommendations: 1. Additional right-of-way shall be dedicated to the Public along the 8,W, North Dakota St. frontage to increase the right-of-way to 30 feet from the centerline. The description shall be tied to the existing tight-of-way centerline. The dedication document shall be on City forms; instructions are available from the Engineering Department. 2. The applicant shall be required to provide half-street improvements for S.W. North Dakota St. meeting minor collector street standards, along the frontage of the site. As a minimum, half-street improvements shall include, traffic control devices, concrete sidewalks, curbs, asphaltic concrete pavement, storm drainage, streetlights, and Undergrounding of utilities. ENGINEERING COMMENTS: CUP 92-02 LATTER-DAY SAINTS/STARX 3. Two (2) set S of detailed public improvement plans and profile construction drawings shall be submitted for preliminary review to the Engineering Department. Seven (7) sets of approved drawings and one (1) itemized onstruction cost estimate, all prepared by a Professional Engineer, shall be submitted for final review and approval (NOTE: these plans are in addition to any drawings required by the Building Division and should only include sheets relevant to public improvements. 4. An erosion control plan shall be provided as part of the public improvement drawings. The plan shall conform to "Erosion Control Plans - Technical Guidance Handbook, November 1989." 5. Construction of the proposed public improvements and issuance of Building Permits shall not commence until after the Engineering Department has reviewed and approved the public improvements plans, a street opening permit or construction compliance agreements has been executed, execution of a developer-engineer agreement and payment of all permit fees. 6. The applicant shall provide a storm drainage system that meets the minimum standards and it shall be approved by the City Engineer. 7. Storm drainage details shall be provided as part of the public improvement plans. Calculations and a topographic map of the storm drainage basin service area shall be provided as a supplement to the public improvement plans. Calculations shall be based on full development of the serviceable area. Tht location and capacity of existing, proposed, and future lines shall be addressed. 8. The applicant shall install a water quality facility under the guidelines of Unified Sewerage Agency Resolution and Order No. 91-47. Alternatively, the City Engineering may waive this requirement to the extent allowed by the regulations of the Environmental Quality Commission and Unified Sewerage Agency as they exist at the time the Public Improvement Plans are approved. 9. As part of the public improvement plans the applicant shall apply for and provide the necessary information to obtain a "aoint Permit" for erosion control. IN ADDITION THE APPLICANT SHOULD BE AWARE OF THE FOLLOWING SECTIONS OP THE COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT CODE; THIS IS NOT AN EXCLUSIVE LIST. 1, SECTION 18.120.060 BONDING AND ASSURANCES A. On all projects where public improvements are required the Director shall: ENGINEERING COMMENTS! CUP 92-02 LATTER-DAY SAINTS/STARX 1. Require a bond in an amount not greater than 'AO percent of other adequate assurances as a condition of approval of the site development plan in order to ensure the completed project is in conformance with the approved plan; and 2. Approve and release such bonds. B. The bond shall be released when the Director finds the completed project conforms to the approved site development plan and all conditions of approval are satisfied. 2. SECTION 18.164 STREET AND UTILITY IMPROVEMENT STANDARDS 4 u 4: A. 18.164.120 Utilities 1. All utility lines including, but not limited to those required for electric, communication, lighting and cable television services and related facilities shall be placed underground, except for surface mounted transformers, surface mounted connection boxes and meter cabinets which may be placed above ground, temporary utility service facilities during construction, high capacity electric lines operating at 50,000 volts or above. B. 18.164.180 Notice to City Required 1. Work shall not begin until the City has been notified in advance. 2. If work is discontinued for any reason, it shall not be resumed until the City is notified. 4. —" CD:oup9-02 .CD ENGINEERING COMMENTS: CUP 92-02 LATTER-DAY SAINTS/STARK ' 4 eA '411; *11 0 4 1111112Mransw BPSNIEILIMLSOMEna TO: . DATE jj1I 23 1992 PROM: Tigard Planning Department RE: CONDITIONAL USHIJERMIT_CUP_ 92-0002 PLANNED DEVELOPMENT PDR 92-0004 LATTER-DAY SAINTS/STARK (NPO #7) A request for conditional bWOlanned Development conceptual plan approval to construct a church building of approximately 17,000 square feet and a storage building of approximately 300 square feet with a related off-street parking development. APPLICABLE REVIEW CRITERIA: Community Development Code Chapters 18.50, 18.96, 18.98, 18.100, 18.102, 18.106, 18.108, and 18.130. LOCATION: 11065 SW North Dakota Street (WCTM 1S1 34DB, tax lot 300) ZONE: R-4.5 (PD) (Residential, 4.5 units/acre, Planned Development) The R-4.5 zone allows single family residential units, public support facilities, residential treatment homes, farming, temporary uses, and accessory structures among other uses. Attached is the Site Plan and applicant's statement for, your review. Prom information supplied by various departments aud agencies c d from other information LVailable to our staff, a report and recommendation will be prepared and a decision will be rendered on the proposal in the near future. If you wish to comment on this application, we need your comments by Agg. 3, 1992. You may use the space provided below or attach a separate letter to return your comments. xsaiLassialaalertimpiond by the above Fiats4 please phone the staff contact noted below with your comments and confirm your comments in writing as soon as possible. If you have any questions regarding this matter, contact the Tigard Planning Department, PO Box 23397, 13125 SW Hail Blvd., Tigard, OR 97223. PHONE: 639-4171. RECEIVED PLANOWn IW36 19se STAPP CONTACT: ,Jerry Offer PLEASE CHECK THE VOLLOWING ITEMS THAT APPLY: We have reviewed the proposal and have no objections to it. Please contact of our office. Please refer to the encleeed letter. Written Comments: .811111■10,1, Rabe of Perden commehtihqt 8 Ai_gmAlvivE) . . Phone Number: 66 Y4,2_,,,Z I bkm/CUP92-02 .8KM RESUEST FOR COMMENTS TC__IDLP Vit FROM: Tigard Planning Department &z4i- DATE: July.23, 1992. RECEIVED PLANNING AUG 061992 RE: CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT CUP 92 -0002 PLANNED DEVELOPMENT PDR 92 -0004 LATTER- DAY SAINT1 /STARK (NPO #7) A request for Conditional Use Planned Development conceptual plan approval to construct a church building of approximately 17,,000 square feet and a storage building of approximately 300 square feet with a related off - street parking development. APPLICABLE REVIEW CRITERIA: Community Development Code Chapters 18.50, 18.96, 1898, 18.100, 13.102, 18.106, 18.108, and 18.130. LOCATION: 11065 SW North Dakota Street (WCTM 1S1 34DB, tax lot 300) ZONE: R-4.5 (PD) (Residential, 4.5 unite/acre, Planned Development) The R -4.5 zone allows single family residential units, public support facilities, residential treatment homes, farming, temporary uses, and accessory structures among other uses. Attached in the Site Plan and applicant a statement for your review. From information supplied information available to by a departments urstaf, a report and recommendation will be prepared and a decision will be rendered on the proposal in the near future. If you use the space provided attach�a your eparate letter to t1 .eturn your comments. comment on pthi If you are unable to reangnd_bythe above date please phone the staff contact noted below with your comments and cenfirm your comments in writing as soon as possible. If you have any questions regarding this matter, contact the Tigard Planning Department, PO Box 23397, 13125 SW Hall Blvd. , Tigard, OR 97223. PHONE: 639 -4171. STUFF CONTACT: Jerry Offer PLEASE CHECK THE FOLLOWING ITEMS THAT APPLY: We have reviewed the proposal and have no objections toe Please contact of our office. ......)e: Please refer to the enclosed letter. Writtetr Comments: Name of Petro Commenting: Phone Number: ?CAC ; 49 blsm %CtP92-02 : Bid v,e/".1•-. UNIFIED SEWERAGE AGENCY OF WASHINGTON COUNTY INTEROFFICE MEMORANDUM RECEIVED PLANNING DATE: August 3, 1992 TO: City of Tigard FROM: Walter Haight, USA SUBJECT: Tigard Mormon Church AUG 0 6 1992 PROJECT DESCRIPTION The proposed church lies on a 5.3 acre site in TL;gard. The parcel slopes downward from southwest to northeast. There is an existing residential structure that will be demolished. FINDINGS The applicant has submitted a proposed grading plan and a site plan showing existing conditions. The applicant has not addressed drainage issuba. The applicant has not addressed water quality or quantity issues. The applicant has not submitted a proposed utility plan or a proposed erosion control plan. RECOMMENDATIONS The Agency recommends approval of this land use application with the following conditions: An erosion con€'ol plan in conformance with the Agency's R & 0 91-47, Chapter 5, a8 amended by 91-75, and consistent with with current construction guidelines, should be required; All new public storm and sanitary sewers designs shall conform to the Agency's n & 0 91-47, Chapter 3, as amended by 91-75; On-site water quality facilities should be required; An investigation of the downstream impact of surface water leaving the developed site should be conducted. Water quantity detention may be required if the developed parcel causes or Co tributes to downstream flooding of structures. 4*. 4 . . .4 , t,t • 4 1- 155 North rIrst Avehue, Suite 270 Hillsboro, °too 07124 to BEWEELSOSigigigna TO: _a__ DATE: jt__.22222__,__ FROM: Tigard Planning Department RE: CONDITIONAL USE EFRHIT CUP 92-0002 PLANNED DEVELOPMENT PDR 92-0004 ___ILATEBam_oloyaggam (NPO #7) A request for Conditional U7Planned Development conceptual p16,4% approval to construct a church building of approximately 17,000 square feet and a storage building of approximately 300 square feet with a related off-street parking development. APPLICABLE REVIEW CRITERIA: Community Development Code Chapters 18.50, 18.96, 18.98, 18.100, 18.102, 18.106, 18.108, and 18.130. LOCATION% 11065 SW North Dakota Street (WCTM 181 34DB, tax lot 300) ZONE: R-4.5 (D) (Residential, 4.5 units/acre, Planned Development) The R-4.5 zone allows single family residential units, public support facilities, residential treatment homes, farming, temporary uses, and accessory Structures among other uses. Attached is the Site Plan and applicant's statement for, your review. From information supplied by various departments and agencies and from other information available to our staff, a report and recommendation Will be prepared and a decision will be rendered on the proposal in the near future. If you wish to comment on thin application, we need your comments by Auq. 3 199a. You may use the space provided below or attach a separate letter to return your comments. JULWALAMDIAble to ree=nfLgy2:he above date, please phone the staff contact noted below with your comments and confirm your comments in writing as soon as possible. If you have any questions regarding this matter, contact the Tigard Planning Department, PO Box 23397, 13125 SW Hall Blvd., Tigard, CR 97223. PHONE: 639-4171. STAFF CONTACT: Jerry Offer PLEASE CHECK THE FOLLOWING ITEMS THAT APPLY: We have reviewed the proposal and have no objections to it. Please contact __________ of our office. re...maw iake.mos Please refer to the enclosed letter. Written CoMMentst ••••••••••••■•••••••••••• •••••••444., 4,...•••••••‘••■•••■• ...■.■■•••••■•■■•■•••rw Irriii••■•••■••■•••••■••44•444.4, 4.4,44•4••••••••• •••■•••••■••••••••••••••■■•■••••••••••••••■•••.•••••■■••■•• Name of Person Commenting: Phone Number: bkm/CUP92-02 ,BKM ' Ci , ?92 -0002 o If any of the existing buildings are to be removed, a demolition permit will be required. The septic tarok shall be pumped out and filled in or completely removed. An inspection shall be obtained after the tank is filled or removed. A copy of the receipt from the pumping company shall be provided. o The applicant should be made aware that if the existing well .ie to be abandonded, ,„it should be properly capped -off as required by the State of Oregon Water Resources Department (3850 Portland Rd, NE, Salem y OR 97310. 378-8130) or the Washington County Watermaster. (684 - 4645). Building Division .0 ,teeee,2e„.• , •” • REQUEST FOR COMMENTS, t TO:‘"-*A_Uktijr b FROM: Tigard Planning Department RE: CONDITIONAL USE PERM/T CUP 92-0002 PLANNED DEVSLOPMENT PDR 92-0004 LASITTO-DAY-SAINTS/ST MARI 0 #7) A request for Conditiciia-iiiig7Planned Development conceptual plan approval to construct a church building of approximately 17,000 square feet and a storage building of approximately 300 square feet with a related of f-street parking development. APPLICABLE REVIEW CRITERIA: Community Development Code Chapters 18.50, 18.96, 18.98, 18.100, 18.102, 18.106, 18.108, and 18.130. LOCATION: 11065 SW North Dakota Street (WCTM 151 34DB, tax lot 300) ZONE : R-4.5 ( PD ) (Residential, 4.5 units/acre, Planned Development) The R-4.5 zone allows single family residential units, public support facilities, residential treatment homeo, farming, temporary uses, and accessory structures among other uses. Attached £5 the Site Plan and , applicant's statement for your review. From information supplied by various departments and agencies and from other information available to oun staff, a report and recommendation will be prepared and a decision will be rendered on the proposal in the near future. If you wish to comment on this application, we need your comments by Aug. 3, 1992. You may use the space provided below or athach a separate letter to return your comments. If vou ate unable to res theWL._,__2cly!3datiea please phone the staff contact noted below with your comments and confirm your comments in writing as soon as possible If you have any questions regarding this matter, contact the Tigard Planning Department, PO Box 23397, 13125 SW Hall Blvd., Tigard, OR 97223. PHONE: 639-4171. • ' RECEI VED JUL 2 4 1992 RECEIVED PLANNING --A-U444- 1992 DATE: July 23, 1992 STAFF CONTACT: aerry Offer PLEASE CHECK THE FOLLOWING ITEMS THAT APPLY: XX We have reviewed the proposal and have no objections to it. Please contact Please refer to the enclosed letter. XX. Written Comments: As with all develoPments, water main size and location' water meters will be reviewed and approved through the Water District ••••■■....1,*•1■01■•■■■•■■••■■•■•■•0■•••■•••■•■ office. Final approval of fire hydrant location will be coordinated 04/01■IIIPOSAI*8•1■110.■■•.* yith Gene 13irchill of Tualatin Valle" Fire & RescUe witLaal.va1 _J;1117.511.1911,the Water District. of oUr of flee. Mama of Person Commenting: biic,...itigineRerang Tech. III phone Number: 6 39 -1 554 bkm/CUP92-02 .8KM 4 • •'; • MONTS DATE: FROM: Tigard Planning Department 1E: CONDTTI)N2L USE PERMIT CUP 92-0002 PLANNED DEVELOPMENT PDR 92-0004 LATT'ER-DAY SAILTSIATARK (NPO #7) A request for Conditional Use/Planned Development conceptual plan approval to conatruct a church banding of approximately 17,000 square feet and a storage building of approximately 300 square feet with a related off-street parking development. APPLICABLE REVIEW CRITERIA: Community Development Code Chapters 18.50, 18.96, 18.98, 18.100, 19.102, 18.106, 18.108, and 18.130. LOCATION: 11065 SW North Dakota Street (WCTM 1S1 34DE, tax lot 300) ZONE: R-4.5 (PD) (Residential, 4.5 units/acre, Planned Development) The R-4.5 zone allows single family residential units, rublic support facilitiee, residential treatment homes, farming, tempoLary uses, and accessory structures among other uses. Attached is the Site Plan and applicant's atatement for your review. From information supplied by various departments and agencies and from other information available to our staff, a report and recommendation will be prepared and a decision will be rendered on the proposal in the near future. if you wish to comment on this application, we need your comments by 1ing.,3, 1992. You may uee the space provided heloW or attach a separate letter to return your comment9 . una).?le to_r_ceapond thrALs)3ove datsu. please phone the staff contact noted below :1ta your comments and confirm your comments in writing as goon ao par:foible. If you have any questions regarding this matter, contact the Tigard Planning Department, PO Box 23397, 13125 SW Hall Blvd., Tigard, OR 97223. PHONE: 639-4111. STAFF CONTACT: PLEASE CHECK THE FOLLOWING ITEMS THAT APPLY: We have reviewed the proposal and have no objections to it. t. Please contact of our office. Ay. 4 4,4 Please refer to the enclosed letter. Written Ce.ommentii: < S 12'64'0 Name of Person Commenting: Phone Number: (.,,L---2-6a "t- bkm/cUP92-02 .BKM ot) • • ' • • '"••,°..' ' . Egogsp FOR COMMENTS DATE: ,JWL1L, TO: FROM: Tigard Pinning Department RE: CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT CUP 92-0002 PLANNED DEVELOPMENT PDR 92-0004 LATTER-DAY SAIETALSTItRK (NPO #7) A request for Conditional-UiWidanned Development enceptual plan approval to construct a church building of approxieute'y 17,000 square feet and a storage building of approximately 300 equ,re feet with a related off-street parking development. APPLICABLE REVXEW CRITERIA: Community Development Code Chapters 18.50, 18.96, 18.98, 18.100, 18.102, 18,106, 18.108, and 18.130. LOCATION: 11065 SW North Dakota Street (WCTM 151 34DB, tax lot 300) ZONE: R-4.5 (PD) (Residential, 4.. units/acre, Planned Development) The R-4.5 zone allows single family residential units, public support facilities, residential treatmeat homes, farming, temporary uses, and accessory structures among other uses. rorwansoroommoaw 70%tached is the Site Plan and applicant's statement for your review. From information sv2plied by various departments and agencies and from other information fi,vai:letIle to oer staff, a report and recommendation will be prepared and a decAgen wiil be rendered on the proposal in the near future. If you wish to comment. on this application, we need your comments by Auo. 3, 1992. You may use the space provided below or attach a separate letter to return your comments. 1 . . a s t u aroLunable_targgpcmgilyIlleabove 4fftes please phone the staff contact noted below with your comments and confirm your comments in writing as soon as possible. If you have any questions regarding this matter, contact the 9°4ard Planning Department, PO Box 23397, 13125 SW Hall Blvd., Tigard, OR 97223. PHONEt 639-4171. lta STAPP CONTACT: erry Offer PLEASE CHECK THE FOLLOWING, ITEMS THAT APPLY: We have reviewed the proposal and have no objections to it. Please Contact of our fice. Pleabe refer to the enclosed letter. Written Commenter, im.......44444441,44.1444444.1.44.44,414.4.41,4444-J6.44,414 ...1■•■••■•■•■•■••■■■■•■••••■■••■■•■••••••••••••■■•••■••••••■••■■1 Name of Person Commenting: Phone Number: bkm/CUP92-02.8104 .....44.1.4.4.4414444444.444144.4.44,0444:4.1■44.4 4.111.4.411.1,4.1.1.440........1■••■••■•••••44••••••■•••••■•• RECEIVED PLANNING JUL 2 7 1992 'moo FOR COMMENTS FROM: Tigard Planning Department RE: CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT CUP 92-0002 PLANNED DEVELOPMENT PDR 92-0004 LATTER-DAY SAINTS STARK (NPO #7) A request for Conditional Use/Planned Development eonceptual plan approval to construct a church building of approximately 17,000 square feet and a storage building of approximately 300 square feet With a related off-street parking development. APPLICABLE REVIEW CRITERIA: Community Development Code Chapters 18.50, 18.96, 18.98, 18.100, 18.102, 18.106, 18.108, and 18.130. LOCATION: 11065 SW North Dakota Street (WCTM 1S/ 34DB, tax lot 300) ZONE: R-4.5 (PD) (Residential, 4.5 units/acre, Planned Development) The R-4.5 zone alloWs single family residential units, public support facilitiee, residential treatment homes, farming, temporary uses, and accessory structures among other uses. Attached is the Site Plan and applicant's statement for your review. From information supplied by various departments and agencies and from other information available to ow r staff, a report and recommendation will be prepared and a decision Will be rendered on the proposal in the near future. If you wish to comment on this application, we need your comments by AIM. 3, 1992. You may use the space provided below or attach a separate leLter to return your comments. If you are unable to res..nd b the above date please phone the staff contact noted below with your comments and confirm your comments in writing au soon as possible. If you have any questions regarcling this matter, contact the Tigard Planning Deparfment, PO Box 23397, 13125 SW Hall Blvd., Tigard, OR 97223. PHONE; 639-4171. STAFF CONTACT: Jexe_.0fefejs'____— PLEASE CHECK THE FOLLOWING ITEMS THAT APPLY: We have reviewed the propoeial and have no objections to it. Please contact of our urficeo mvar■amow. Please refer to the enclosed letter. Written Comments: 4 1. M 4.1 Name of Peron ConlMenting; Phone Number: bkm/CUP92-02,BKM JUL 2 8 1992 JUL 24 1992 _the6,_ DATE: Ju3.992 _____oimmficooNs mow FROM: Tigard Planning Department RE: CONDI ZONAL US PERMIT CUP 92-0002 PLANNn. DEVELOPMENT PDR 92-0004 LATER-DAY SA/ TS TARK (NPO #7) A request for Conditional Usg7Planned Development conceptual plan approval to construct a church building of approximately 17,000 square feet and a storage building of approximately 300 square feet with a related off-street parking development. APPLICABLE REVIEW CRITERIA: Community Development Code Chapters 18.50, 18.96, 18.98, 18.100, 18.102, 18.106, 18.108, and 18.130. LOCATION: 11065 SW North Dakota Street (WCTM 181 34DB, tax lot 300) ZONE: R-4.5 (PD) (Residential, 4.5 unite/acre, Planned Development) The R-4.5 zone allows single family reoidential unite, public support facilities, residential treatment homes, farming, temporary uses, and accessory structures among other uses. Attached is the Site Plan and applicant's statement for your review. From information supplied by various departments and agencies and from other information available to our staff, a report and recommendation will be prepared and a decision will, be rendered on the proposal in the near future. If you wish to comment on this application, we need your comments by 1992. You may use the space provided below or attach a separate letter to return your comments. If_ygu ajr_.i_table to respond jay the above date please phone the staff contact noted below with your comments and confirm your comments in writing as soon as possible. If you have any questions regarding this matter, contact the Tigard Planning Department, PO Box 23397, 13125 SW Hall Blvd., Tigard, OR 97223. PHONE: 639-4171. STAFF CONTACT: Jerry Offer PLEASE CHECK THE FOLLOWING ITEMS THAT APPLY: We have reviewed the proposal and have no objections to it. Please contact of our office. Please refer to the encloSed letter. Written Comments: Name of PerOon CoMMenting: Phone Number: bkM/CUP92-02.BKM • sj. TO: 10,4 toetS BEQUEST FOR COMMENTS DATE: Jul 23 1992 FROM: Tigard Planning Department RE: CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT CUP 92-0002 PLANNED DEVELOPMENT PDR 92-0004 LATTER-DAY SAINTS STARK (NPO #7) A request for Conditional Use Planned Development conceptual plan approval to construct a church building of approximately 17,000 square feet and a storage building of approximately 300 square feet with a related off-street parking development. APPLICABLE REVIEW CRITERIA: Commnity Development Code Chapters 1F.50, 18.96, 18.98, 18.100, 18.102, 18.106, 18.108, and 18.130. LOCATION: 11065 SW North Dakota Street (WCTM 151 34DD, tax lot 300) ZONE: R-4.5 (PD) (Residential, 4.5 units/acre, Planned Development) The R-4.5 zone allows single family residential units, public support facilities, residential treatment homes, fatMing, temporary usea, and accessory structures among other uses. Attached is the Site Plan and applicant's statement for your teview. From information supplied by various departments and agencies and from other information available to our staff, a report and recommendation will be prepared and a decision will be rendered on the proposal in the near future. If you wish to comment on this; application, we need your comments by Auq. 3, 1992. You may use the space provided below or attach a separate letter to return your comments. y:IabletorIfouareutid, the abovestalaL pleads phone the staff contact noted below with your comments and confirm your comments in writing as soon as possible. If you have any 'questions regarding this matter, contact the Tigard Planning Department, PO Box 23397, 13125 SW Hall Blvd., Tigard, OR 97223. PHONE: 639-4171. STAFF CONTACT: Jett Offer PLEASE CHECK THE FOLLOWING ITEMS THAT APPLY: We have reviewed the propoaal and have no objectione to it. Wil•■••■•••••01.01 Please contact of our office. Please refer to the enclosed letter. Written Comments: Name of Person Commenting: Phone NUmber: woo■•■•■•arnarosernlorriawat".............dorrommorss bkm/CUP92-02.81,04 1110•MMOMINNI•••■•111.1000 PROPOSAL DESCR/PTIOU FILE NO: CUP 92-0002 / PDR 92-0004 FILE TITLE: CHURCH OF JESUS CHRIST / LEE / RUFF / STARK APPLICANT: John Stark OWNER: Lee-Ruff-Stark Architects 5285 SW Meadows Road, #340 Lake Oswego, Oregon 97305 Church of Jesus Christ of Latter-Day Saints. 50 E. North Temple St. Salt Lake City, Ut. 497305 1,415—ts REQUESTi A request for Conditional Use/Planned Development conceptual plan approval to construct a church buildinq of approximately 17,000 square feet, a storage building of approximately 300 square feet with related off-street parking development. APPLICABLE REVIEW CRITERIA: Community Development Code Section 18.50, 18.96, 18.98, 18.100, 18.102, 18.106, 18.108, 18.130. LOCATION: 11065 SW North Dakota Street. (WCTM 1S1 34D8, tax lot 300) ZONE: R-4.5(PD) (Residential, 4.5 units per acre, Planned Development) The R-4.5 zoning allows single family residential, public support facilitieo, residential treatment home, farming, manufactured home, family day care, home occupation, temporary use, residential fuel tank j and accessory structures, NiO NO: 7 NPO CHAIRPERSON: Cal Woolery PHONE NUMBER: 639-4297 CHECK ALL WHICH APPLY: STAFF DECISION COMMENTS Dug SACK TO STRVF ON 1992 PLANNING COMMISSION DATE OF HEARING: TIME:2230 HEARINGS OFFICER DATE OF HEARING: TIME:7:00 CITY COUNCIL DATE OF HEARING: TIMMUM ATTACHMENTS X VICINITY MAP X NARRATIVE X SITE PLAN STAFF CONTACT: X LANDSCAPING PLAN X ARCHITECTURAL PLAN JL OTHER:GRADING PLAN .4. " • *„ 4 74. ' ,• • . CITY OF TIGARD, OREGON CONDITIONAL_TIOLUELISAIME CITY OF TIGARD, 13125 SW Hall, PO Box 23397 Tigard, Oregon 97223 - (503) 639-4171 1. GENERAL INFORMATION ISCAining**614241118111•0111111MISM CASE NO. OTHER CASE NO'S: FOR STAFF USE ONLY RECEIPT NO. APPLICATION ACCEPTED BY: DATE: Applic!Oon elements submitted: PROPERTY ADDRESS/LOCATION 11065 S.W. North Dakota Sr. 1-'6) Application form (1) B) Owner's signature/written uthorization (C) Title transfer instruinnt (1) re A SW. TAX MAP AND TAX LOT NO. 131 34 DS T Lot 300 SITE SIZE Approx. 5,3 Acres PROPERTY OWNER/DEED HOLDER*Wini.mdh ADDRESS Mario ' a IatUa: ( ) E Vito§Etah sale '1E11 ath..53 _JO CITY .......5a1 etwilakhaX344,06=0,..■.*.* •■■■,* APPLICANT* ADDRESS 5285aaL jaeadagaid„ jatoPHONE CITY __Lake_amaalai._02 ZIP AlmAitieL____ *When the owner and the applicant are different people, the applicant must be the purchaser of record or a leasee in possession with written authorization from the owner or an agent of the owner with written authorization. The owner(s) must sign this application in the space provided on page two or submit a written authorization with this application. •2. PROPOSAL SUMMARY The owners of record of the subject request conditional use approval to * • associated off-street parking. 11•010•••101.001 property allow 0736P/23P Revd: 3/88 Assessor's map (1) , Site plan (pre -appochecklist) Applicant's statement (pre-app. checklist) ..s,- addre's.st,-wIthim-e50-44,et-44 (H) Filing fee (t34) l‘e500 tow ROK '3601'04000A -11,60-415141,14 DATE DETERMINED TO BE COMPLETE' FINAL DECISION DEADLINE: comP. PLAN/ZONE DESIGNATION: /".h. N.P.O. Number: Hearings Officer Approval Date: Vinal Approval Date: Planning Engineering • 3. List any variance, sensitive lands permit, or other land use actions to be considered as part of this application: 4. Applicants: To have a complete application you will need to submit attachments described in the attached information sheet at the time you submit this application. 5. THE APPLICANT(S) SHALL CERTIFY THAT: A. The above yrecq st doea . not , _ violate an eed restrictions that may,. be - efwr..r.� rrrr -- - .raowrral�.r �rrr ■ n.r�r� u .wr-r: attached to os imp► ©sesi upon the stlb ect property. - • wma�rer Mrwrwrrrerw.awr�.r�rrwfw�uw �ww �rownr �r.r Bb If the application is granted, the applicant will exercise the rights granted in accordance with the terms and subject to all the conditions and limitations of the approval. C All of the above statements and the statements in attachments, and exhibits transmitted herewith, are applicants so acknowledge that any permit issued, application, may be revoked if it is found that any such statements false. the plot plan, true; anA the based on this are D. The applicant has read the entire contents of the application, including the policies and criteria, and understands the requireMents, for approving or denying the application. DATED this it r day of,..ri SIGNATURES of each owner (eg. husband and wife) of the subject property. r b' (IKSL:pm /0736P) dY' al PHYSICAL FACILITIES North America Northwest Area RC Box 15309 Boise, Idaho 83715 Phone (208) 342 -2735 Facsimile: (208) 345.2192 April 1, 1 992 TO WHOM IT MAY CONCERN: John Stark of Lee, Ruff, Stark Architects is authorized to represent the Corporation of the Presiding Bishopric of the Church of Jesus Christ of Latter -day Saints as the architect for the Tigard 1, Metzger 1 & 2 Wards, Lake Oswego Oregon Stake, #539-1555-77-1 proposed project. Manager CITY Or TIGARD - RECEIPT AME . 4 LEE-RUFF-STARR APCH1TECTS -DDRESS 6885 SW. MEADOWS RDD i 4I340 LAM. OSWEGO, O 9.7036• F PAYMENT RECEIPT NO 0a-RE:9507 mem AMOUNT g 541.60 CASH AMOUNT : 0.00 PAYMENT DATE SUBDIVISION g PURPOSE Or PAYMENT AMOUNT PAID PURPOSE OF PAYMENT • LAND OS5 APPL $DR 9,1s-92 1500000 LAND USE APPL CUP. • 2 42 TOTAL AMOUNT prun - ti36. $(11 RECEIVED PLANNING JUL 15 1992 July 14,1992 Flemings Officer Community Development Department City of Tigard 13125 SW Hall Blvd. Tigard, Oregon 97223 RE: Application for Conditioi ,al Use. Narrative of Proposed Rquest CUP Application # 92 -02 L'RS Project # 92018-1.00 This application is for a Conditional Use, approval for construction, of a religious assembly with associated off - street parking and storage building. The Church of Jesus Christ of Latter -Day Saints (app licant) respectfully u es your a pp roval of this to uest. A review of: 1. Description. 2, List of Applicable Zoning Standards. 3, Compliance With Applicable Zoning Standards and Conditions. follows for your consideration. 1. Description. The 5.3 acre site is bounded on the south by SW North Dakota Street, on the west and north by residential properties and on the east by a private ingress /egress drive, 50 feet wide, which in turn abutts residential property. The site slopes gently downward from southwest to northeast, Existing vegetation on the site consists of grass, weeds, trees and blackberry bushes. The west central portion and southeast corner of the site are wooded, primarily with native douglas fir The remnants of orchard trees are located in the southwest corner of the site, d structures, including a single-family hour, detached aes and garage, Several wood framed shed, and barn are located site. Several abandoned vehicles, pp aced on the si garden debris are also present at the site. 5285 5,W, tvMSADOWS ROAD SUITE 340 f AKI OSWSGO, OR 41 9703$ i (503) 684 -4747 a FAX (503) 6844749 Hearings Officer Com 'iunity Development Department City of Tigard 7/14/92 Page 2 There is one, possibly two water wells on the site. All existing structures are to be removed and existing well(s) to be abandoned. Development is to include a meetinghouse building having approximately 17,000 gross square feet, a storage building of approximately 300 square feet, 176 off - street parking spaces, and a bicycle rack for apprrximately 12 bikes. The north 200 feet of the site is to remain undeveloped. Chapter 18.130, Chapter 18.50, Chapter 18.96, Chapter 18.98, Chapter 18.100, Chapter 18.102 Chapter 18.106, Chapter 18.108, Conditional Use R4.5, Single - Family Residential Additional Yard Setback Requirements and Exceptions ;wilding Height Limitations: Exceptions Landscaping and Screening Visual Clearance Areas Off- Street Parking and Loading Requirements Access, Egress, and Circulation 3. Compliance With Applicable Zoning Standards and Conditions. Applicable Standards as indicated in Section 18.130.040. ,K_r._3Q:_Q9.A.1 The 5.3 acre site ha;; adequate size and dimensions such that all proposed use meet applicable City of Tigard Standards and Conditions for development. All characteristics of the site are such that no adverse or unsafe conditions would be created as a result of this proposed development. . . , sanitary , . power, . y + and as is �av able to the site in SW Water, sari�t sewer, owE�r, g ail North Dakota Street. There is sufficient additional capacity in each of these utilities to service this proposed development. Hearings Officer Community Development Department City of Tigard 7/14/92 Page 3 No existing storm sewer is presently available to the site at any property line. The applicant will complete a value engineering study to determine alternatives and the most viable alternative. This will be done in conjunction with the City Engineering staff. 11*(044 a The zoning designation for this site is R4.5, Single-Family Residential. The standards of Chapter 18.50 apply. Section 18.50.040.A.12 lists religious assembly as an conditional use allowed within this zoning designation. The site layout meets all applicable lot size, setback and building height requirements of Section 18.50.050, Dimensional Requirements. Additional Requirements per Section 18.50.060: The site layout meets all applicable requirements of Chapter 18.96, Additional Yard Setback Requirements and Exceptions. The proposed building meets all applicable requirements of Chapter 18.98, Building Height Limitations: Exceptions. The site layout meets all applicable requirements of Chapter 18.10v, Landscaping and Screening. The site has been designed to maximize preservation of existing trees. The site layout meets all applicable requirements of Chapter 18.102, Visual Clearance Areas. The applicant defers judgment to city staff for determination of how best to achieve the desired visual clearance requirements at the east entrance to the site. It will be necessary to remove and prune existing fir trees located at the west iide of the entrance drive. The site layout meets all applicable requirements of Chapter 18.106, Off-Street Parking and Loading Requirements. 172 full size parking spaces are proposed together with 4 handicapped spaces. Bicycle racks have not been indicated on the plans, however, space has been allocated for the 12 requited racks. This facility will not receive or distribute material or merchandise by truck. No loading spaces are proposed. The site layout meets all applicable requirements of Chapter 18.108, Access, Egress, and Circulation. 4�, .r �, .4 1 :/i_, 41 .i1. iY 4. r.. ..., ... ri •1., �7 Hearings Officer Community Development Department City of Tigard 7/14/92 Page 4 A wall sign for building identification purposes is proposed as indicated on the drawings. It is to be located on the south facade and integral with the building. The intent is tha the sign be legible to those visiting the site. Lettering on the sign will not be legible ftut a the right-of-way of SW North Dakota Street. The size of the sign is to be approximately 3 feet high by 4 feet wide and should be considered exempt as defined by Section 18.11.060.A.2, which states "Signs not oriented or intended to be legible from a right-of-way, other property, or from the air," The sign will not have lighting. All information required of Section 18,120, Site Development Review, as determined at the Pm- Application Conference and Application Checklist has been included . with this application. 11 /. - I .. ' R II. 11 This proposal is consistant with ail applicable policies of the Comprehensive Plan. Sincerely, LED iF .STAR rl AR C y CTS Stark, Par File # 92018-1,00 / 2.02 T. E RUJFP STARK FACSIMILE 'ANSMYTTAL To: Jer Off fi Ianner From: Keith Pyca P.O. City !gad �/ 6 O Box 23397 /� Tigares, OR 97223 FAX #: 684 -7297 Date: 07/14/92 Poject New Meetinghouse I�ohrth Dakota Stet Project #: 32(}Z$ -1,00 �1~1'otesb Ci of Tigard SD192.92 / CUP 92 -02. cup Nary i - 7 �t ve, There are 5 pages, including this transmittal sheet. Please call if you do not receive any part of this PAX. 5285 S M. MEADOWS ROAD b SWIM 340 • LAKIJ. OSW11GO4 OR b 97035 • (503) 684 .4747 • FAX (503)6M.4749 90 /tO d O O' cN 8T :5T 6t bT of 6l2.b- 1189 - a8 raft 111 HOV A VIS d t1J 311 OREGON TITLE INSURANCE COMPANY APR 10$4 ftCEIVED LRF Title Branch 1515 SW Fifth Avenue, Suite 840 Portland, Oregan. 97201 220-0015 / FAX 220-0706 Date Prepared: April 7, 1992 Attn: Keith Pyeatt Reference: ORDER NO. 75:8190wps CUSTOMER REWERENCE: CHURCH OF LATTER DAY SAINTS FEE : $75.00 OREGON TITLE INSURANCE CCHEM, herein the COmpany, has provided the attached information as a special service based on the records and indices listed herein. THIS IS NOT A PRELMMINNEM TITLE REPORT, NOR A cammmENT TO ISSUE TITLE INSURANCE. No examination has besamade of the title to the herein described property, other than as specifically set forth herein. Liability for errors and/or omissions is limited to the amount of fee paid, and the Cbmpany will not ofterudee be responsible. The Ctnpany has no liability far any error or omissionwhfrla does not result In actual loss to the named customer. The charge for this service will not include supplemental reports, updates, or any other additional services. If additional services are requested, the following charges will be assessed by the Company: (1) TWenty-five dollars ($25.00) for each supplemental, update, or related seavim, verbal or written, within a 60 day period; however, the Cbmpany will assess a minimum $25.00 charge for any work done at the courthouse. (2) After 60 days, the charge shall be fifty dollars ($50.00) per hour, with a one hour minimum. COpies of dOcuments maybe assessed at the rate of twenty-five Cents (0.25) a page or at the rate chaxged by a government agency, e.g., the agency rate fOr copies of court filins. d *41111° Tract N 1: Beginning ng at an ircn pipe on the North line of the J.L. Hicklin, Donation Land Claim No. 54, said point being South 89° 16' East 888.0 feet from an limn pipe at the Northwest earner of said donaticri land claim, the North 0° 33' East 518.0 feet to the r Robinson lands, South 89* 45' East an pipe �(� 6�J. � 4L� line of the Raleigh � e 880.0 feet from an ism pipe at the center of Sam 34, l'ownship 1 South, Range 1 West, of the Willamette Meridian, in the County of Washington and State of Oregon; thence followings. d line and the South line of Agnes Wales lands South 89° 45' East 418.4 feet to an iron pipe can the West side of a 20 fob lane; thence c n the West line of the SEIMG South 00 33 Neat 522.4 lfeet to an irrn in and claim; thence North ter of County Road. on the North line of said donation 89 ° 16' Jest 418.4 feet to the place of becalming. EXCEPT the East 30 feet thereof. TRACT 11 Beginning at a steel ale set Mirth 89° 45' We 1739.5 feet from queer motion coiner cm the Bast boundary :y of Section 34, Town .p 1 South, Range l West, of the Willamette Meridian, in the Canty of 6ushi g ► and State of Oregon; thence Nbrth 44.58 feet; thence South 89° 45' East 341.3 feet; thence South 44.58 feet; thrice North 89° 45' West 341.3 feet to the place of begs. Ore. Title Ins. Co. File Nos :;: l9 Subject to the limitations .f ied on the cover sheet, Company has searched its title plant records, and the Cbtu any reports as follows: According to the Canpaacy's title plant records for Washington County, Oregon, as to land described below, the any finds the following matters from through 5:00 P.M. on March 24, 1992 : A. The land which is the subjwt of this search is described as follows: (Continued) B • The aware t vested owner is C. The land is subject to the following Apparent monetary e c as s: THIS SEARCH DOES Nor INCLUDE ANY EASD [Ds , COVENANTS, RESTRICTIONS, OR OTHER SUCH 1. Taxes far the year 1991 -92 Original rnt : $4,788.39 Tax Mount : S4,788.39 Unpaid, Balance : $1,596.13 96.13 plus interest, if any. Code lb. 023.74 Key No. R269220 & 269239 Map No. : 1S1341.03-00300 & 1Sl34OB - 00300 -51 -84 (Split Code) 2. Municipal liens, if any, imposed by the City of Tigard.. 3. The subject property lies within the boundaries of the Unified Sewerage Agency and is subject to the levies and assessneilts thereof. RUFF STARK 11 T E RECEIVED PIANNING TRANSMITTAL • Jerry Offer, Planner Comunity Development Department City of Tigard P.O. Box 23397 Tigard, OR 97223 Nuw Meetinghouse 11065 SW North Dakota Street CUP Application #92-02 Project #: We are sending you: attached ionmowaranurrowaranomi under separate cover CUP Application Narrative For your use, to accompany our CUP application, Transmitted by Keith Pyeatt Copies to: File 92018 1.08 Delivered by: 5285 S.W. MEADOWS ROAD • SUITE 340 « LAKE OSWEGO, OR 97035 * (503) 684-4747 'rAX (503) 684-4749 monsweviamewiniffin 2 FRI 16:12 LDS PH `': , :. AL FAC. tirk "i4 aaj Z 540" FAX HO. 208 '"4 192 ATThG I ,�20 26.1 1 P. EA R rtATb Et 41.0000 3 Ip DECKER tS IIS L. EIC X0.1 RF'iC R P.02 Fr.)..!6 ut pow 10 • FEE 02 TO Q. N SURvIre 1,111 0.16 N. 0.12 E FD. Tin" 1•. vEY 7;1'11 Off'► Korn E PO. P AXLE SURVEY 5301 OS 6.011 E • 61I Fa. 1" ,0..1 ,�°� SURvEY 5.301 l 023 IS., WELD E -W (035 6, SURVEY 605 ALSO 10. 1546* 1.5t, UP !n p ! SURVEY 1,111 WA VJl 30.E N !9' 31' S,`' iwr...r....ru+ 10.. LOT 115 TR,4C.T II (r)EI . . 313 Dec Y 456) N Ch" 36' 12• W 44,56 : 0.0-- `•' *' x 00■15 410.044 Imor iii i Staff CITY OF TIGARD COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENI DEPAatMENT APPLICATION CHECKLIST The items on the checklist below are required for the successful completion of your application submission requirements. This checklist identifies what is required to be submitted with your application. This sheet MUST be brought and submitted with all other materials at the time you submit your application. See your application for further explanation of these items or call Planning at 639-4171. BASIC MATERIALS ITEMS TO BE INCLUDED: A) Application form (1 copy) B) Owner's signature/written authorization C) Title transfer instrument D) Assessor's map E) Plot or site plan F) Applicant's statement (G)-----tlrs"t-cFe-property-otpmera-&-addressns-wkthlw-ZSO-fazet-- (H) Filing fee 0.AAfneggethAtt SPECIFIC MATERIALS A) S1t91__Cn_,format_:_Msowii.onsi (No. of copies 5C)): 1) Vicinity Map 2) Site size & dimensions 3) Contour lines (2 ft at 0-10% or 5 ft for grades 4) Drainage patterns, courses, and ponds 5) Locations of natural hazard areas including: a) Floodplain areas [ b) Slopes in excess of 25% 1 3 c) Unstable ground E ) d) Areas with high seasonal water table I ) e) Areas with severe soil erosion potential 1 ) f) Areas having severe:4 weak foundation toils [ Location of resource areae as shown on the Comprehensive Map inventory including: a) Wildli 2 habitats b) Wetlands 7) Other site features: a) Rock outcroppings b) Trees with 6" + caliper measured 4 feet from ground level 0) Location of existing structures and their uses 9) Location and type of on and off-site noise sources 10) Location of existing utilities and easementn 11) Location of existing dedicated right-of-ways 111±9.3m2.21ansEntlImAloAits (No, of copies 1) The proposed site and surrounding properties 2) Contour line intervals 3) The location, dimensions and names of all: a) Existing & platted streets & other public ways and easements on the site and on adjoining • properties APPLICATION CHECKLIST - Page 1 • 411 b) Proposed streets or other public ways & easements on the site. c) Alternative routes of dead end or proposed streets that require future extension The location and dimension of: a) Entrances and exits on the site b) Parking and circulation areas c) Loading and services areas d) Pedestrian and bicycle circulation e) Outdoor common areas, f) Above ground utilities The location, dimensions & setback distances of all: a) Existing permanent structures, improvements, utilities and easements which are located on the site and on adjacent property within 25 feet of the site b) Proposed structures, improvements, utilities and easement% on the, site C� ft/ Es/ E 6) Storm drainage facilities a'rrc�"�''�""""-�` C do Sanitary sewer facilities 1 , 8) The location of areas to be landscaped The location and type of outdoor lighting ') .. prevention techniques 1 considering crime preven � ' 10) The location of mailboxes 11) The location of all structures and their orientation 12) Existing or proposed sewer reimbursement agreements r 3 G_ dirg P lan (No. of eopies ( 3 The site development plan shall .include a grading plan at the same scale. as the site analysis drawings and shall contain the following information. TO The location and extent to which grading will take place indicating general contour lines slope ratio and soil stabilization proposals, aid time of year it is proposed to be done. supported by A statement from a regiseed engineer data factual substantiating: a) subsurface exploration and geotechnical engineering report b) .. The validity of sanitary sewer and storm drainage proposals roblems wi ll+be c) That all problems mitigated and how they will be m7itigated 0) Architectural_ Drawler (No, of copies ,,,.„..,.) .The site development plan proposal shall include: 1) Floor plans indicating the s quare footage of all structures proposed for use on—site: and 2) Typical elevation drawings of each structure. E) Landscape Plan (No. of copies The landscape plan shall be drawn at the same scale of the site analysis plan or a larger scale if necessary and shall indicate: Description of the 1) irri gation system where applicable e 2) Location and height of fences, buffers and screenings APPLICATION CHECKLIST — Page 2 (3 3) Location of terraces, decks, shelters, play areas and common open spaces 4) Location, type, size and species of existing and proposed plant materials, The iandscape plalo shall include a narrative which addresses: 1) Soil conditis 1 ] 2) Erosion control measures that will be used. 1 3 PIELIPLEMingl Sign drawings shall be submitted in aordancawith Chapter 18.114 of the Code as part of Site Development Review or prior to obtaining a Building Permit to construct the sign. ( Le/ G) Traffic oeneration estimate (3 H) Prq13 laajartition or lot line ad'ustment mvhowinq (o, Copies ): 1) one owner of the subject parcel 2) The owner's authorized agent E 3) The map scale, (20,50,100 or 200 feet=1), inch north arrow and date 3 4) Description of parcel location and boundaries 5) Location, width and names of streets, easements and other public ways within and adjacent to the parcel E 31 6) Location of all permanent buildings on and within 25 feet of all property lines 4. .1 7) Location and width of all water courses ( 3 8) Location of any trees with 6" or greater caliper at 4 feet above ground level 3 9) All slopes greater than 25% ( 3 10) Location of existing utilities and utility easements ( 3 11) For major land partition which creates a public street: a) The proposed right-of-way location and wiath E 3 b) A scaled cross-section of the proposed street plus any reserve strip 1 3 12) Any applicable deed restrictions 1 3 13) Evidence that land partition will not preclude efficient future land division 'here applicable 1) subdivision PrelitilIDIELE1411192.2.124-4ata112914229(I10. of Copies ): 1) Scale equaling 30,50,100 or 200 feet to the inch and limited to ono phase per sheet 1 3 ) The proposed name of the subdivision 3) Vicinity map showing property's relationship to arterial and collector streets t 3 4) Names, addresses and telephone numbers of the owner' developer, engineer, surveyer, designer, as applicable( 3 5) pats of application 1 3 6) Boundary lines of tract to be subdivided ( 3 7) Names of adjacent subdivision or .names of recorded owners of adjoining parcels of UnsUbdiVided land 0) Contour lines related to a City -established bench-a. mark at 2-foot intervals for 0-10% grades greater than 10% t 3 APPLICATION cHtmus-r -- Page 3 • APPEALS Director's Decision to Planning Commission . costs Planning Commission/Hearings Off. to Council BLASTING PERMITS COMPREHENSIVE PLAN PROCESSING Text only, Map only, )K CONDITIONAL USE PROCESSING Conditional Use Review FLEXIBLE SETBACK STANDARDS . HISTORIC OVERLAY DISTRICT kOME OCCUPATION Original Permit Renewal $675.00 $365.00 $ 80.00 $ 80,00 $ 50.00 $ 10.00/year INTERPRETATION OF COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT CODE . $ 55.00 by Community Development Department LAND PARTITION Residential and Non-residential . . $235.00 400T LINE ADJUSTMENT *FANNED DEVELOPMENT PROCESSING Conceptual and detailed plan review SENSITIVE LANDS Flood plain Wetlands/Steep slopes/Drainageway SIGN CODE EXCEPTIONS SIGN PERMIT 0-24 sq. ft. $ 10.00 24-100 sq. ft. $ 25.00 100 + sq. ft $ 35.00 Temporary signs . . . . - $ 10.00 each SITE DEVELOPMENT REVIEW Under $10,000 $ 10,000 $ 99,999 $ 100,000 - $499,999 . $ 500,000 - $999,999 $1,000,000 or more . over $1 million not to exceed SUBDIVISION PRELIMINARY PLAT Subdivision Variance, if needed TEMPORARY USE Director Decision . . • Special exemption/Non-Profit TREE REMOVAL PERMIT . . VACATIONS Streek:s and public accE VARIANCE Administrative Sign Code . ZONE CHANGE ANNEXATIONS Less than 10 acres 10 acres 4-3,r more ZONE CHANGE PROCESSING Lest than 10 acres . 10 acres or more . . . . . ZONE ORDINANCE AMENDMENT . . . . . . . $ 80.00 • $155.00 $315.00 $415.00 $520.00 $2000. $415,00 + $5/lot OXMa* be).00 $ 50.00 $ -0- $80 00 $230.00 • $520.00 $625.00 JOINT APILICATION PLANNING FEE . . fee ;Ails 10% of all additional brIttesloks1 $520.00 $625.00 $310.00 • . . • loot of higheSt planning planning fees related to the proposal. • , , DATE: APPLICANT: , LAkeV Day . atiA5 • CITY OF TIGARD PRE-APPLICATION CONFERENCE NOTES Phone: k AGENT: PROPERTY LOCATION ADDRESS: , TAX HAP St NECESSARY APPLICATION sJ P...”` TAX LOT: 111_2 f k.) A IQ • Phone: --7 (5 ) : (..c>ND TIOIL)0(C, (* (A) PROPOSAL DESCRIPTION: (-0,..../S •••••••••••••■••••••••••••■••••••••••■• 4.tit Cr 3o0 • EL012E-Air COMPREHENOft PLAN DESIGNATION: ZONING DESIGNATION: NEIGHBORHOOD PLANNING ORGANIZATION 0 , CHAIHPBRBON: PHONE: ••••••••••■••••••••••••••••••••••••• ■•••••••••■••••••••• lz°11 ZONING DISTRICT DIMENSIONAL REQUIREMENTS Minimum lot size: :240.2.1Dsq. ft. Minimum lot width: ft. Setbacks: front- ;)5 zt. side-2) ft., rear-a) ft. garageist"----ft. corner- ft. from both streets. Maximum site coverage: en Pi) Sedrioh Minimum landscaped or natural vegetation area: RV% ••••-, IA 4 a Maximum building height: 'Et, ft.— (A.414;h 0 .kci. 04. e.5toLD i3..e 4)44 4. iy,00.4«,t hkV Mce-Plel tr qtveS. ADDITIONAL LOT D/MENSIONAL REQUIREMENTS Minimum lot frontage: 25 feet unless lot is created through the minor land partition process. Lots created as part of a partition must have a minimum of 15 feet of frontage or have a minimum 15 foot wide access easement. .ua;tniarma-4ret--eiept4r-L-o--wi-drir 2.5 to 1. SPECIAL SETBACKS Streets: • la) ft. from centerline of &NJ Nov`. Establish • : rom Lower latenAltY_vaneaz------.1- ft., along the site's nag lot: 10 ft. side yard setback Accessory structures: up to 528 sq. ft. in dizett5 ft. and rear lot lines Accessory etructureet up to 1000 sq. ft. (where allowed) see applicable zoning district setbacks Zero lot line lots: minimum 10 foot separation between buildings Multi-family residential building separation: See code Section 18.96.030 ■■■■■•••■••••■■■•.11 boundary setback from side Page 1 i'z,,,,,,,,..,..i.:...,,,,..,.,...,..,,,''..',,,,......'.,,..,,,,,,,,,,,;,,,.,,.,,,,,,,,,,,,,, '*:! 4 •:',!, 'I. , * ..1'''..' 1,•:: .....: .i: -:,' • ,. . . , ..• n, /..., '''..., ' ■ t• . ■ . .' r. ■ NEWSINNEINMi SPECIAL BUILDING HEIGHT PROVISIONS Flag Lots: Maximum height of 1-1/ in most zones; 2-1/2 s R-40 zones if standards 25 ft., whichever is less 35 ft. in R-7, R-12, R-25 or de Section 18.98.030(B) are met. Building Height Exceptions (Code Section 18.98.020): Bdildings located in a non-residential zone may be built to a height of 75 feet provided: 1. A minimum ?2R (building floor area to site area ratio) of 1.5 to 1 will exist; 2. All actual building setbacks will be at least 1/2 the building's height; and 3. The structure will not abut a residential zone* district, RES/DENTIAL DENSITY CALCULATION Community Development Code Chapter 18.92 specifies that the net residential units allowed on a particular site may be calculated by div.Wing the neire,areaf---tte-d<elopable area br the minimum number of square feet require. per dwellineunit in the applicable zoning district. Net development •• ea is calculated, by subtracting the f lowing land area(a) from the gross site area: 1. All sensitive lands areas OP) d within the 100 ye floodplai lopes exceeding 25% ainagys 2. Lald dedicated for park p oses 3. Pub :Lc right-of-way d-, c tion 4. All d prov or p ivate streets (includes accessways through parking areas) The City of Tigard allows a residen ial density transfer of up to 25% of the units that could otherwise ha e been developed on sensitive lands areas listed in (1) above to th- developable portion of the site in accordance with Code Section 18.9 .030. It is the responsibility of the applicant for a residential development application to provide a data ed calculation for permitted residential density and density transfer RESIDENTIAL DEVELOPMENT SOLAR ACCESS REQUIREMENTS Effective Flay 1* 1991 all subdivisions and Minor partitions Solar access requirement State that 80% of all lots be solar-oriented. T• z characta- leVeld of WintertiM* sun striking house Orientation “aXimizing south area. To achieV. thcbil, one may uti 1. 2. 3. sties of a solat-orie he smith Wills and window area, an ize the fol ' • are bject to eloped must d lot are high ofa of the hodae, a south-sloping roof wing: •, 10 with least 90 feet of northsouth on thin 30 degrees of south; 0 Solar building line mdst a) be south, b) have A minimum of 70 feet he lot to the south, c) have a minimum northernmost buildable boundary of the ne is located. irst option requires the house to be of an east-west axis and have at leant th wall protected from shade, The second Basic req irement: De3ign a lot dimen:ion and an orientat Protected Solar Building Line oriented thin 30 degrees between it d the midd , of of 45 feet bet - and the lot on which the building 1' Performance Options: The oriented within 30 degree 80% of the ground floor so '; Page 2 tam option requires at least 32% of the glass and 500 square feet of roof area to face south and be protected from shade. Total or partial exemption of a site from the solar access requir be for the following re ns: 1. East, west 2. Off-site 3. On-sit he ent can r north slope steeper than 20%. hade sources (st ,btures, vegetation, t...graphy). shade sources (vege tation). Adjuetmen allowing reduction of th 80% solar lot be for t,e following reasons: 1. .educed density or an increase, cost to: - east, west or north slope gr t than 10%, - significant natural feature, - existingw,road or lotting p, t-rn, - public easement or right, if-wty. • Reduction in important elopm-nt amenities. 3. Pre-existing shadat (v etation). esign requirement can at least five percent due Mersa, pd text sufficie desii standard, exc required, includi I to show the t for lots for all of the folio • evelopment complies with the solar hich an exemption or adjustment LS ing items: The h-south lot dimension a d front lot line orientation of each posed lot. 2. Protected solar building 1.nes and relevant building site restrictions, if applicable. 3. For the purpose of identifyi . trees exempt from Section F, a map showing existing trees at last 30 feet tall and over 6 inches diameter at a point 4 feet above grade, including their height diameter and species, and s tting that they are to be retained and are exempt. 4. Copies of all private restrictions relating to solar access. If an exemption or adjustment i requested, maps and text sufficient to show that given lots or areas in the development comply with the standards for such an exemption or adjus ment shall be submitted. RESIDENTIAL DENSITY TRANSITION Regardless of the allowed ()using density in a zoning district, any property within 100 feet o. a designated established area shall not be developed at a density greater than 125 percent of the maximum comprehensive Plan designation (not zoning) of the adjacent pardel. PARKING AND ACCESS Required automobile parking for this type of use: ieer ""A 4'.6 Pr 't A A A 4.0e440/ drat • *there OW sagerititter-titio-eregulered-ioarAins4 , • • 1,e tic) -A k ed Sece+5 25% of required spaces may be designated compact-only spaces. Standard parking space dimensions: 9 ft. X 18 ft. Compact parking space dimensions: 8.5 ft. X 15 ft. kh iffAdicapped parking: All parking areas providing in excess of five " Aviv required automobile parking spaces shall provide appropriately located and designated handicapped parking spaces. The minimum number of handicapped Page 3 parking spaces to be provided and parking space size are mandated by the Oregon Revised Statutes (sae handout). A handicapped parking space symbol shall be painted on the parking space surface and an appropriate sign shall be provided. Bicycle racks are required for civic uses, non-residential uses, Yss15 commercial uses, and industrial uses providing 15 or more automobile \ arking spaces. Bicycle parking must be provided at a ratio of one ' bicycle rack space per 15 auto parking spaces. Bicycle racks shall be located in areas protected from automobile traffic. The Planning Division can provide specifications for. approved bicycle rack types. All parking areas and driveways must be paved. Dr-i-ve.-+Ii-ttaia-queulnej-aredal Minimum number of accesses: ale pm:__822,__Ao C.65 Minimum access w4Ath: Iallj:____ Maximum access width: gLrlkr_______ Pedestrian access must be provided between building entrances and parking areas, outdoor common areas, and public sidewalkfJ and streets. Ost For detailed information on design requirement !3 for parking areas and accesses, see Community Development Code Chapters X8.106 and 18.108. CLEAR VISION AREA The City requires that clear vision be maintained between three and eight feet above grade at road/driveway, road/railroad, and road/road intersections in specified clear vision areas. The size of the required clear vision area depends upon the abutting street's functional classification. LANDSCAPING Street treed are required for all developments fronting on a public or private street or a driveway more than 100 feet in length. Street trees must be placed either within the public right-of-way or on private property within six feet of the right-of-way boundary. Street trees must have a minimum caliper of two inches at four feet above grade. Street trees should be spaced 20 to 40 feet apart depending on mature tree size. Further information on regulations affecting street trees and a list of recommended street trees may be obtained from the Planning Jivision. A minimum of one tree per Eleven parking spaces must planted in and around parkiiig areas • in order to provide a canopy ef4ect. Landscaped screening of parking areas from views from public rights-of-way must be provided, BUFFERING AND SCREENING 1 In order to increase privacy and to reduce or eliminate adverse noise or visusl impacts between adjacent developments, especially between different land uses, the City requires landscaped buffer areas along certain site perimeters. Required buffer areas are described by the Code in terms of width. Buffer areas must be occupied by a mixture of deciduous and evergreen trees and shrubs. Site obscuring screens or fences are also required in some cases, and often are advisable even if not required. Required buffer areas may only be occupied by vegetation, fences, utilities, and sidewalks. SIGNS Additional information on required buffer area materials and sizes may be found in Code Chapter 18.100 and the Planning Division bulletin on landscaping and buffering. .54ec e I Required buffer widths applicable to your proposal area: ,2-0 ft. a;pag north boundary ft. along south boundary ) ft. along east boundary 94) ft. along west boundary A In addition sight obscuring screening is required along 0Youc) t ti"4 t4.. tt.4. .■■•■•• Own•MMIN16S.1.1.1■40111.11.11.1 Permits must be obtained before erecting any sign in the City of Tigard. A "Guidelines for Sign Permits" handout is available upon request. Additional sign area or height beyond Code ntandards may be permitted if the sign proposal is reviewed as part of a development application. O. N.4 1.44\ hib ec.^qN ;,,,t 110 cd1+ Pd OffAIRTEEMMOIMPRE , a SENSITIVE LANDS ADDITIONAL PLANNING CONCERNS OR COMMENTS *Th..C.Y...._61,\ 6010V CO -rot coAck. •Ickim\t'a ulktVe at, trV COAtc741.1.41 tij .tdkioaNte:loc:\ _4L; t I oil t(:. *,c oc'tre.1± (‘W'Clo, _ELIA e ccessot vo t.nv e v dm. 4c, If 4h frtspor.o: 4tt. r■sA V t .rt i) I ci4 _ Page 5 -Po el• ..r 4.70.1i,51 .0Ve. eit-6,t., 14- 1•11, ...11\tk•C ' Administrative staff review. Public hearing before the land use hearings officer. Public hearing before the Planning Commission. Public hearing before the ' ?lanning Commission with the Commission making a recommendation on the proposal to the City Council. Another public hearing is held by the City Council. All applications must be.accepted by a Planning Division staff member at the Community Development Department counter at City Hall. Applications submitted by mail or dropped off at the counter without Planning Division acceptance may be returned. Applications submitted after 4:30 P.M. on Thursday will be batched for processing with the following week's applications for processing. No applications will be accepted after 3 :00 P.M. on Fridays or 4 :30 on other days. Maps submitted twitth an appl,.cation shall be folded in advance to 8.5 by 11 inches. One 8.5 inch by 11 inch map of a proposed project should be submitted for attachment to the staff report or administrative decision. The lanning Division and Engineering Division will do a preliminary rev'' of the application and will determine whether an application is Y complete within 10 days of submittal. staff will notify an applicant if additional information or copies of the submitted rhate:: iala are needed. The administrative decision /public hearing typically will occur approximately 45 to 60 days after an application is accepted as complete by the Planning Division. Applications involving difficult issues or requiriv'ig review by other jurisdictions may take additional time to review. Written decisional are issued within 10 days of the hearing. A 10 day appeal period follow all decisions. An appeal on this matter would be heard by the A basic flow diagram illustrating the review process is available from the Planning Division. The pre-appl'Ication nfence and the notes of the conferenc l are inten ded to inform the prospective applicant of the primary Community Development Code requirements applicable to deveplopment of a p articular site and to allow h e staff and prospective applicant to discuss the opportunities and constre,intC affecting development of the site. The conference and notes cannot cover all Code requirements and aspects of good site planning that should apply to the development of your site plan. Failure of the staff to provide any information required by the Code shall not constitute a waiver of the applicable standards or requirements. It is recommended that a prospective applicant either obtain and read the questions of City Code requirements yDevelopment Code or ask any qs staff relative to y Community prior to submitting an application. re -a li Another cat p pp on conference is requited pre-application d if an application is to be submitted more than six months after this conferences unless the second conference is deemed unnecessary by the Planning Division. PREPARED 13 : n QFti. ",... MANNINO DIVISION PONE: 39-4171 PUBLIC FACILITIES ' The purpose of the pre-application conference is to (i) identify applicable Comprehensive Plan policies and ordinance provisions; (ii) to provide City staff an opportunity to comment on specific concerns; and (iii) to review the application review process with the applicant including identifying who will be the final decision maker for the application. The extent of public improvements and dedications to be required of the applicant will be recommended by City staff and approved by the appropriate authority. There will be no final recommendation to the decision maker by City staff until all commenting agencies, City staff and the public have had an opportunity to review and comment on the application. The following comments are a projection of public improvement related requirements that may be required as a condition of development approval for your project. Right-of-way dedication The City of Tigard requires that land area be dedicated to the public to increase abutting public rights-of-way to the ultimate function.R1 street classification rights-of-way width specified by the Community DeVelopment Code. Approval of a development application for this site will require dedication of right-of-way for 443'11 6UL) Netrfk DAM et ‘)It feet from centerline. to feet from centerline. street improvements will be necessary along 6VJ NOR111 WOL. street improvements will be necessary along 3. Needed street improvements will include feet of pavement from centerline, curb and gutters, storm sewers, a five-foot wide sidewalk, necessary street signs, streetlights, and a two year sf,treetlighting fee. Xn some cases where street improvements are not currentl deferred. In these cases, property owner(o) must exe the property owner's right improvement district forme. improvements or .other necessary public tical, the street improvements may be dition of development approval, the -remonstr greement which waive3 rate net the formation of a local r s a c ute a no to rernons im 1. 2. PedestrianwaysibikeWays: Sanitary Sewers: The closest sanitary sewer to this property is an inch line located udi L4Akol-ck_ . The proposed development must be connected to a sanitary Sewer. Tr6-4-19-4ho-4guelopax.f.s eaparra±b±t±trstoextenti--141e-SV e . sl 's Storm sewer iivrovementS: d e to Page 7 Ar 4 WaterSupply: The TtePAD Water District (Phone:631-1554/ ) provides public water service in the area of this site. The District should be contacted for information r-garding water supply for your proposed development. Pire Protection: Tualatin Valley Fire and Rescue District (Contact: Gene Birchill, 645-8533) provides fire protection services within the City of Tigard. The District should be contacted for information regarding the adequacy of circulation systems, the need for fire hydrants, or other questions related to fire protection. Other Agency Permits: TRAFFIC IMPACT FEES In August, 1990, the Washington County Board of Commissioners adopted the county-wide Traffic Impact Fee (TIF) Ordinance and referred the measure to the Washington Qounty voters. In September, 1990, the Washington County electorate overwhelmingly approved expanding the TIF program throughout all jurisdictions within the county. This action placed into effect an increased street development fee on all new development in Washington County. The City of Tigard has adopted the county's program. The City Traffic Impact Fee program will collect fees from new development based on the development's projected impact on the transportation system. Developing properties will be required to pay based on the number of trips they are projected to generate. The TIP is calculated based on type of use size of project, and a general use based fee category. The TIP shall be calculated at time of building permit issuance. In limited circumstances, .payment of the TIF may be allowed to be deferred until issuance of occupancy permit. Deferral of payment until occupancy is permissible only when the TIF is greater than $5,000.00. ..: __ - ._,-..: _ .-, -- -.I, --.-_-_.: , - -..:7-':--: .-•:-,1'.::. -::--, - :::-.:--f ',. -. '..,. :-': -.-_- -- • • , ' - -----.:- ..-- :._ . .1- ri) Cl C13 ii „... iv H ii 0 . - 0 Z _ •._ ,-,- tg _ ,et ta STORMWATER QUALITY PEES The Unified Sewerage Agency has established and the City has agreed to enforce, Resolution No. 90-43, Surface Water Management Regulations, requiring the construction of on-site water quality facilities or fees in lieu of their construction. The resolution requires that a fee and/or construction of a water quality facility be built. The fee is based on the amount of impervious surface; for every 2640 square feet Or portion thereof, the fee shall be $315.00. The City of Tigard determines i a fee, or facil ty shall be built. .1s' I."; !t. ecni tit-116A of et 4Q,A6Ay t5; )t, 11144 , fel." a STREET OPENING PERMIT No work within a public right-of-way shall commence until the applicant has obtained a street opening permit from the Engineering Department. FINISHED FLOOR ELEVATIONS On all projects that: require a grading plan the applicant shall submit with the grading plan a typical floor plan for each lot which shall have the elevations of four corners of that plan along with elevations at the corner of each lot. PREPARED BY: 1( ENGINEERING DIVISION PHONE 639-4171 470:PREAPP.MST Page 8 • Si 1., ST •cYPIPICATION LIST FOR ALL APPLICATIONS CPO NO. 4 iwo Na. -7 (2) copies ----- CITY DEPARIENTE1iT9 ✓' Building Official /Brad R. City Recorder Engineering /Chris D. Permits Coordinator/Viola G. 3. SPECIAL DI T CTs • Fire District "—" (Pick -up box) V/ Tigard Water District - 8777 SW Burnham St. Tigard, OR 97223 Tualatin Valley Water Dintrict 6501 SW Taylors Ferry Rd. Tigard, OR 97223 4. AFFECTED JURISDICTIONS Wash. Co. Land tine & Transp. 150 N. First Ave. Millsboro, OR.r`D7124 Brent Curtis - Kevin Martin - Joann Rico Scott King Fred Eberle Mike Borreson ..err City of Beaverton Jim Bendryx PO Box 4755 Beaverton, OR 97076 city of King city city Manager 15300 SW 116th King City, OR 97224 city of Lake Oswego city Manager 300 SW A Lake OoWego, OR 97034 State BigbWay Division gob Doran PPoortland54OR 97225 -0412 5. SP:Ce3AL AGENCIES General Telephone Russ Wells 12460 SW !fain st. Vigard, OR 97223 NW Natural Gas Scott Palmer 220 NW second A'Ve. Portland, OR 97209 TCI Cablevision of Oregon Mike unhook 3500 SW Bond St. Portland, OR 97201 Columbia Cable (Prank Stone) 14200 SW Brigadoon Ct. Beaverton, OR 97005 6. STATE AGASCISS Aeronautics Div. (ODOT) Engineer Board of health - Fish & Wildlife Parks & Recreation Div. Subdivision supervisor ` Dept. of Energy Dept. Of Environ. Quality 7. FEDERAL AORSCIES Corps. of Engineers Post Office 0, r7TSER Southern Pacific `transportation Company - Duane M. Forney, PLS .. Project Engineer 800 NW 6th Avenue, R. 324, Union station Portland, OR 97209 ____,Parks G Recreation Board Molico eld Operations School Dist No. 40 (Beaverton) Joy Pahl PO Box 200 Beaverton, OR 97075 f "School Diet. 23J (Tigard) 13137 SW Pacific Ewy. Tigard, OR 97223 Boundary_ Co>mtisission 320 SW Stark Room 530 Portland, OR 97204 METRO 2000 sW 1st ave. Portland, OR 97201 -5390 DLCD (CPA's only) 1175 Court St. NE Salem, OR 97310 -0590 °ther„_„_ ,.. City of Durham City Manager 17160 sW Upper iloones Ferry Rd. Tigard, OR 97224 City of Planning Director "'""" g iesctotc 1120 SW 5th Portland, OR 97204 ODOT Lidwien Raimmann 9002 SS McLoughlin Blvd. MilWaukie, OR 97222 (."Portland General Elec. ""` Brian Moore 14655 SW Old Scholi s Fry. �Beaverton, OR 97007 G! am"" !Metro Are* Communications Jason Hewitt Twin Oaks Technology Center 1015 NW 169th Place S-6020 Beaverton, OR 97006 -4006 US Weat Pete Nelson 421 SW Oak St. Portland, OR 97204 Doc.AMI division of State Land's _,"_ Commerce Dept. - M,.D. park LCDC PUC �--' Fire Marshall Other other,, ,�_, h 4 Y Staff Date CITY OF TIGARD COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT APPLICATION CHECKLIST The items on the checklist below are required for the successful completion of your application submission requirements. This checklist identifies what is required to be submitted with your application. This sheet MUST be brought and submitted with all other materials at the time you submit your application. See your application for further explanation of these items or call Planning at 639 - 4171. ITEMS TO BE INCLUDED: BASIC MATERIALS Application form (1 copy) C A) S C ) Owner's signature /written authorization [ C) Title transfer instrument E D) Assessor's map I E) Plot or site plan F) Applicant's statement C ro er t owners - &- -addr�esses--varthiti —2' O eet°-" I .� H) Filing fee ($,,6'e 4%e sale M . a SPECIFIC MATERIALS ,,/ of copies i ): C 4J A) Site (information showing (Na �► � 1) Vi+iinity Map [44;5- 2) Site size & dimensions 3) Contour l,gnes (2 ft at 4)- -1�19L or 5 ft for` grades 5 iC176') 4) Drainage patterns, courses, and ponds ( ) 5) Locations of natural hazard areas including: a) Floodplain areas C C 3 b) Slopes in excess of 259 C ) c) Unstable ground d) Areas with high seasonal water table C3 Areas with severe soil erosion potential C 3 f) Ar B severely s C 3 f) Areas havxn severel weak foundation soils Location of resource areas as shown on the Comprehensive Map inventory including: a) Wildlife habitats C C 3 b) Wetlands �) Other site features: a) Rock outcroppings C 3 L b) Trees with 6" 4. caliper measured 4 feet -ion of existing structures and their uses (4 from ground level 8) Location B . i on and off –site noise sources C 3 in 9) Location and type of 10) Location of existing utilities and easements � ) utilities a 11) Location of existing dedicated right --of --ways n lopment Plan showing Hof copies Sites_ ..Ave B) � bowing (,IVo a �. 1) That proposed site and surrounding properties Pri 2) Contour line intervals 3) The location, dimensions and names of all: a) Existing & platted streets & other public ways and easements on the site and on adjoining I properties ' APPLICATION CHECKLIST -- Page 1 b) Proposed streets or other public ways & easements on the site. c) Alternative routes of dead end or proposed streets that require future extension The location and dimension of a) •. Entrances and exits on the site b) Parking and circulation areas c) Loading and services areas d) Pedestrian and bicycle circulation e) Outdoor common areas, f) k,ove ground utilities The location, dimensions & setback distances of all: a) Existing permanent structures, improvements, utilities and easements which are located on the site and on adjacent property within 25 feet of the site b) Proposed structures, improvements, utilities and easements on the site 6) Storm drainage facilities do,. s 7) Sanitary sewer facilities 0) The location of areas to be landscaped 9) The location and type of outdoor lighting considering crime prevention techniques 10) The location of mailboxes 11) The location of all structures and their orientation 12) Existing or proposed sewer reimbursement agreements Grading Plan (No. of copies ,) The site development plan shall include a grading plan at the same scale as the site analysis drawings and shall contain the following information. 1) The location and extent to which grading will take place indicating general contour lines, slope ratios and soil stabilization proposals, and time of year it is proposed to be done. A statement from a registered engineer supported by data factual substantiating: a) Subsurface exploration and geotechnical engineering report b) The validity of sanitary sewer and storm drainage service proposals c) That all problems will be mitigated and how they will be mitigated Architectural Drawings (No. of copies ) .The site development plan proposal shall include: 1) Floor plans indicating the square footage of all structures proposed for use on -site and 2) Typical elevation drawings of each structures C] C�/ C] C C1 C ] E Landscape Plan (Nor of copies c: [ 3 The landscape plan shall be drawn at the same scale of the site analysis plan or a larger scale if necessary and shall indicate 1) bescr.ption of the irrigation system where applicable C ] 2) Location and height of fences, buffers and screeniintgs C4 jPILXCATXON CHECkLZST -- Page 2 3) Loci o n of terraces, decks, shelters, play areas— and common open spaces 4) Location, type, size and species of existing and proposed plant materials. C The landscape plan shall include a narrative which addresses: 1) Soil conditions. C ] 2) Erosion control measures that will be used. C ) Sign.Drawings Sign drawings shall be submitted in accordance with Chapter 18,114 of the Code as part of Site Development Review or prior to obtaining a Building Permit to construct the sicn, C G) Traffic generation estimate C ] H) Preliminary_partition or lot line adjustment map showinc, 1) Th The of the subject parcel 3 2) The owner's authorized agent [ ] 3) The map scale, (20,50,100 or 200 feet =1), inch north arrow and date C 3 4) Description of parcel location and boundaries C w 5) Location, width and names of streets, easements and other public ways within and adjacent to the parcel [ ] 6) Location of all permanent buildings on and within 25 feet of all property lines 13 7) Location and width of all water courses C 3 8) Location of any trees with 6" or greater caliper at 4 feet above ground level C 3 9) All slopes greater than 25% C 3 10) Location of existing utilities and utility easements C 11) For major land partition which creates a public street: a) The proposed right—of—way location arl width C 3 b) A scaled cross — section of the proposed street plus any reserve strip 12) Any applicable deed restrictions 13) Evidence that land partition will not preclude efficient future land division where applicable C3 C3 Subdivision Preliminartilat. Map_ and data showing(No of Copies ): 1) Scale equaling 30,50,100 or 200 feet to the inch and limited to one phase per sheet C 3 2) The proposed name of the subdivision C 3) Vicinity map showing property's relationship to arterial and collector streets C 3 4) Names, addresses and telephone numbers of the owner developer, engineer, surveyer, designer, as applicable( 3 Date o 5) f application C 6) Boundary lines subdivided 3 7) 2 Names of adjacent subdivision or names of recorded owners of adjoining parcels of Unsubdivided land C I 8) Contour lines related to a City — established bench- mark at 2 —foot intervals for 0-10% grades greater than 10% C I APPLICATION CHEMIST — Page 3 CITY OP TIGARD PRE-APPLICATION CONFERENCE NOTES Phone rE'J PoR't (OA) or * l. PLANwer). 4L i icotvieUr COMPREHENSIVE PLAN DESIGNATION: ELL NEIGHBORHOOD PLANNING ORGANIZATION # CHAIRPERSON: PHONE: ZONING DESIGNATION: ZONING DISTRICT DIMENSIONAL REQUIREMENTS MiniMum lot size: 7,47,0000q. ft. Minimum lot width: 1•••■• ft. Setbacks: front- _2a ft. side-'0 ft., rear-a) ft. gaagemil=71t. corner- ft. from both streets. Maximum site coverage: fn kr po sed-loh Minimum landscaped or natural vegetation area: agb „ Maximum building height: 314, ft.--(A44t4N 10104itt of 6".1-atOliSkleok 4V4( kr,00„,,,,,4*, w6(4.+-47 64te.plel 6Y' qiiee'S ADDITIONAL LOT DIMENSIONAL REQUIREMENTS Minimum lot frontage: 25 feet unlesq lot is created through the Minor land partition prOoess. Lots created as part of a partition must have a minimum of 15 feet of frontage or have a miamam 15 foot wide access easement. 2.5 to 1. SPECIAL SETBACKS 4 M ettA Ntk fa streets: XX) ft. from cente -1 rline of Establish . • b •ro Lower intgaudly_ranguil,..---- ,ft., along the Site's boundary Flag lot: 10 ft. side yard setback Accessory Structures: up to 528 sq. ft. in dite=5 ft. setbadk from ide and rear lot lines cessory structures: up to 1000 sq. xt. (Where allowed) - See applicable zoning district setbacks Zero lot line lots: minimum 10 foot separation between buildings Multi-family residential building separation See Code Section 18.96.030 Page 1 ' •":4,4 ' ' • SPECIAL BUILDING HEIGHT PROVISIONS Flag Lots: Maximum height of 1-1/ in most zones; 2-1/2 s R-40 zones if standards Ls 25 ft., whichever is less 35 ft. in R-7, R-12, R-25 or de Section 18.98.030(B) are met. Building Height Exceptions (Code Section 18.96.020): Buildings located in a non-residential zone may be built to a height of 75 feet provided: 1. A minimum PAR (building floor area to site area ratio) of 1.5 to 1 will exist; 2. All actual building setbacks will be at least 1/2 the building's height:; and 3. The structure will not abut a residential zone* district. RESIDENTIAL DENSITY CALCULATION Community Development Code Chapter 18.92 specifies that the net residential units allowed on a particular site may be calculated by dividing the net are velopable area by the minimum number of square feet require it in the applicable zoning district. Net development by subtracting the f lowing land area(0) from the 1. All) per dwelling ea is calculate gross site area: sensitive /ands areas nd within the 100 ye lopes exceeding 25% rainageways 2. La d dedicated for park p 3. Pubic right-of-way 4. All d rov or p through parking areas) • c • The City of Tigard allows a reeiden the units that could otherwise ha areas listed in (1) above to th accordance with Code Section 18.9 • floodplai see tion ivate streets (includee acceseways • ial density transfer Of up to 25% of e been developed on sensitive lands developable portion of the site in .030. It is the responsibility of the applicant for a residential development application to provide a Beta ed calculation for permitted residential density and density transfer RESIDENTIAL DEVELOPMENT SOLAR ACCESS REQUIREMENTS Effective May 1, 1991 all subdivisions and minor partitions areAleg'ject to solar access requirement. t state that 80% of all lots ., eloped must be Solar-oriented. T t characte stice of a solar-orie ,td lot are high levels of Wintertim, sun striking he south Walls and -.ofe of the house, house orientation aximizing south window area, an. a south-sloping roof area. To achiev: this, one may utilize the fo1 ,wing: 1. Basic re. irement: beeign a to with " least 90 feet of north-south lot diMen:.1011 and an orientat on thin 30 degrees of south; 2, Protected Solar Building Line solar building line must a) be Oriented 'thin 30 degreed south, b) have a minimum of 70 feet betWeen it ..td the midd of he lot to the south, c) have minimum of 45 feet bet and the northernmost buildable boundary of the lot on which the building 1 riOt is located, 3, Performance Options: The iret option requites the house to be oriented within 30 degree Of an east-west axis and have at least 80% Of the ground floor so th wall protected from shade. The second Page 2 AMEMBIBIESIMONINECIBERWEREEW a option requires at least 32% of the glass and 500 square feet of M °he roof area to face south and be protected from shade. Total or partial exemption of a site from the solar access requir • ent can be for the following re . •, s: 1. East, we 2. Off -site 3. On-sit Adjustmen be for t 1. west -r north elope: shade sources (st shade sources (vege steeper than 20 %. ctures, vegetation, • tion) }'" allowing reduction of t e following reasons: educed density or an increase. to: - east, west or north slope gr - significant natural feature, - existing woad or lotting p:= t -- public easemeles or right:. f -w Reduction in important elopm Pre- existing shade (v= yetation) Zaps and text suf f is des gn standard, exc regsired, includi � Y ie to show the t for lots for all of the folio • r 80% solar lot graphy). esign requirement can coat if at least five percent due at than 10 %, rn, Y. nt amenities. Development complies with the solar hich an exemption or adjustment is ing items: ►: h -south lot dimension a d front lot line orientation of each posed lot. 2. Protected solar building lines and relevant building site restrictions, if applicable. 3. For the purpose of identifyi trees exempt from Section F, a map showing existing trees at least 30 feet tall and over 6 inches diameter at a point 4 feet above grade, including their height diameter and species, and a Ming that they are to be retained and are exempt. 4. Copies of all private restr ctions relating to solar access. The If an exemption or adjustment i requested, maps and text sufficient to show that given lots or areas in the development comply with the standards for such an exemption or adjus!ment shall be submitted. RESIDENTIAL DENSITY TRANSITION Regardless of the allowed ousing density in a zoning district, any property within 100 feet O a designated established area shall not be developed at a density greater than 125 percent of the maximum Comprehensive Plan designation (not zoning) of the adjacent parcel. PARR aNG AND ACCESS i :roe per a . Aged .6ec� -s or la 'e.�' Required automobile parking for this type of use h ._d S r "t44�0% dVt g e r I I, i 4Ii e v ie t4) II Pio Aked aece -5 25% of required spaces may be designated compact -only spaces. Standard parking Spade dimensions: 9 ft. X 18 ft. Compact parking space dimensions: 8.5 ft. N 18 ft. 'rldicapped parking: All parking areas providing in ex cesd of five �' required ired automobile parking spaces shall provide appropriately located and designated handicapped parking spaces. The minimum number of handicapped Page 3 • parking spaces to be provided and parking space size are mandated by the Oregon Revised Statutes (see handout). A handicapped parking space symbol shall be painted on the parking space surface and an appropriate sign shall be provided. Bicycle racks are required for civic uses, non- residential uses, commercial uses, and industrial uses providing 15 or more automobile arking spaces. Bicycle parking must be provided at a ratio of one bicycle rack space per 15 auto parking spaces. Bicycle racks shall be located in areas protected from automobile traffic. The Planning Division can provide specifications for approved bicycle rack types. All parking areas and driveways must be paved. Minimum number of accesses One . e .. ...,"��D. 5� Minimum access width: Maximum access width: t.A:L Pedestrian access must be provided between building entrances and parking areas, outdoor common areas, and public sidewalks and streets. For detailed information on design requirements for parking areas and accesses, see Community Development Code Chapters 18.106 and 18.108. CLEAR VISION AREA The City requires that clear vision be maintained between three and eight feet above grade at road/driveway, road /railroad, and road /road intersections in specified clear vision areas. The size of the required clear vision area depends upon the abutting street's functional classification. LANDSCAPING Street trees are required for all developments fronting on a public or private street or a driveway more than 100 feet in length. Street trees must be placed either within the public right -of -way or on private ro ert within six feet of the inches right-of-way boundary. Street trees must have have minimum caliper of two n hes at four feet above grade. Street p gu p. p e t trees. should beg aced 20 to 40 feet apart de endin g on ntattar tree site. and a list of Further information on regulations affecting street trees an recommended street trees may be obtained from the Planning Division. h minimum of one tree per seven parking spaces must be planted in and around parking areas in order to provide a canopy offeet. Landscaped roundin g parking areas fron views from public rights -of -way must be provided. Page 4 BUFFERING AND SCREENING In order to increase privacy and to reduce or eliminate adverse noise or visual impacts) between adjacent developments, especially between different land uses, the City requires landscaped buffer areas along certain site perimeters. Required buffer areas are described by the Code in term of width. Buffer areas must be occupied by a mixture of deciduous and evergreen tree e and shrubs. Site obscuring screens or fences are also required in some cages, and often are advisable even if not required. Required buffer areas may only be occupied by vegetation, fences, utilities, and sidewalks. kdditional information on required buffer area materiale and sizes nay be found in Code Chapter 18.100 and the Planning Division bulletin on landscaping and buffering. 4. Required buffer widths applicable to your proposal area: *:4) ft. along north boundary Q ft. along east boundary ft. along south boundary ft. along wept boundary /n addition sight obscuring screening is required along astwav4 SIGNS Permits must be obtained before erecting any sign in the City of Tigard. A "Guidelines for Sign Permits" handout is available upon request. Additional sign area or height beyond Code standards may be permitted if the s gn proposal is reviewed a6 part of a development application. V'eetalA01\4 „. A et415±_ ADD/TIONAL PLANNING CONCERNS OR COMMENTS Ikeye. avak tatoec,( 4tveth Cemm yeavglia. -rt kuv 44,4 'tto e v -letevE•a 4ke-1.4,04ALic) tt. 41AL or c Ix+ itroliA. approval ev acci'vz.1 4:or 4{' tuarryci fropo$Qi, —1(Act+ wad 14aVe 6,4c et ttC Invek.it c(4,41,15 0,66sia,‘) 4-ke, awn k 4110,8 4tAy..,51,„ pic., PROCEDURE Administrative staff review. Public hearing before the land use hearings officer. Public hearing before the Planning Commission. Public hearing before the Planning Commission with the Commission making a recommendation on the proposal to the City Council. Another public hearing is held by the City Council. All applications must be accepted by a Planning Division staff member at the Community Development Department counter at City Hall. Applications submitted by mail or dropped off at the counter without Planning Division acceptance may be returned. Applications submitted after 4:30 P.M. on Thursday will be batched for processing with the •following week's applications for processing. No applications will be accepted after 3:00 P.M. on Fridays or 4:30 on other days. Maps submitted with an application shall be folded in advance te 8.5 by 11 inches. One 8.5 inch by 11 inch map of a proposed project: should be submitted for attachment to the staff report or administrative decision. he Planning Division and Engineering Division will do a preliminary review of the application and will determine whether an application is complete within 10 days of submittal. Staff will notify an applicant if additional information or copies of the submitted materials) are needed. The administrative decision/public hearing typically will occur approximately 45 to 60 days after an application is accepted as complete by the Planning Division. Applications involving difficult issues or requiring review by other jurisdictions may take additional time to review. Written decision re issued within 10 days of the hearing. A 10 day appeal period ollow all decisions. An appeal on this matter would be heard by the A basic flow diagraM illustrating the eview process is available from the Planning Divielion. The Enle-application conference and the noted of the conference are intended to inform the prospective applicant of the primary Community Development Code requirements applicable to development of a particular dite and to allow the staff and prospective applicani. to discusd the opportunitiee and constraints affecting development ci the bite. The conference and notes cannot cover all Code requitelwits and aspects of good site planning that should apply to the development of your site plan. Failure of the staff to provide any information requited by the Code shall not constitute a waiver of the applicable standards or requirements. It ie recommended that a prospective applicant either obtain and read the CoMmunity Development Code or ask any questions of City staff relative to Cede requiremente prior to Submitting an application. Another pre-application conference is required if an application is to be submitted more than silt months after this pre-application Conferondei unless the second oonferende is deemed unnecessary by the Planning bivieion» PREPARED BY:ijETZP., PLANNING/DIVISXOU PHONE: 39-4171 A "..■,e':,(. • ‘z: • 4 PUBLIC FACILITIES The purpose of the pre-application conference is to: (i) identify applicable Comprehensive Plan policies and ordinance provisions; (ii) to provide City staff an opportunity to comment on specific concerns; and (iii) to review the application review process with the applicant including identifying who will be the final decision maker for the application. The extent of public improvements and dedications to be required of the applicant will be recommended by City staff and approved by the appropriate authority. There will be no final recommendation to the decision maker by City staff until all commenting agencies, City staff and the public have had an opportunity to review and comment on the application. The following comments are a projection of public improvement related requirements that may be required as a condition of development approval for your project. eengilt: The City of Tigard requires that land area be dedicated to the public to increase abutting public rights-of-way to the ultimate functional street classification rights-of-way width specified by the Community Development Code. Approval of a development application for this site will require dedication of right-of-way for 16W klOtrfiA keitt- at-to feet from centerline. 2.. Street impsgyements: 1. to feet from centerline. street improvements will be necessary along ,6 toNi 2. street improvements will be necessary along 3. Needed street improvements will include feet of pavement from centerline, curb and guttere, storm Sewers, a five-foOt wide sidewalk, neceeeary street signs, streetlights, and a two year streetlighting fee. . 11010 In some cases where street improvements are not currentl deferred. In these cases, ,O property owner(s) must exe,ute the property owner's right to r improvement district forme. io 1. 2. Pedestrianways/bikewayst improvements or •other necessary public r ,tical, the street improvements may be a c. dition of development approval, the a no -temonstr greement which waivee emons rate not the formation of a local • ■••■•••••••.1..awo..tia■oga.• Sanitar gewera: The c4oseet sanitary sewer to this prbperty is ah e inch line located -a-- j4,21iiiL:\LkLto't.K)ov4.iAt.cx=_ . The proposed reepontribtftty-to-ex development must be connected to a sanitary sla=m9:::=::=1: . . . . Storm sewer imerovementa: 710 $ ei e" ett Page 7 e ne% .4 "My 4: :•1 Water Supply: The M f�i 6.O., U Water District (Phone: 63i 054 ) provides public water service in the area of this cite. The District should be contacted for information regarding water supply for your proposed development. Fire Protections Tualatin Valley Fire and Rescue District (Contact: Gene Birdhill, 645-8533) provides fire protection services within the City of Tigard. The District should be contacted for information regarding the adequacy of circulation systems, the need for fire hydrants, or other questions related to fire protection. Other Agency Permits TRAFFIC IMPACT FEES In August, 1990, the Washington County Board of Commissioners adopted the county -wide Traffic Impact Fee (TIF) Ordinance and referred the measure to the Washington County voters. In September, 1990, the Washington Counter electorate overwhelmingly approved expanding the TIF program throughout all jurisdictions within the county. This action placed into effect an increased street development fee on all new development in Washington County. The City ca: Tigard has adopted the county's program. The City Traffic Impact Fee program will collect feed from new development based on the development' a projected impact on the transportation ay, :.em. Developing properties will be required to pay based on the number of trips they are projected to generate, The TIP is calculated based on type of use, size o6:' project, and a general use based fee category. The TIE' shall be calculated at time ' of building permit issuance. In limited circumstances, payment of the TIF may be allowed to be deferred until issuance of'occupancy permit. Deferral of payment until occupancy is permissible only when the TIP is greater than $5,0U0.00. STORKWATER QUALITY FEES The Unified ` Sewerage Agency has established and the City has agreed to enforce, Resolution No. 90 -43, Surface Water Management Regulations, requiring the construction of on -site water quality facilities or fees in lieu of their construction. The resolution requires that a fee and /or construction of a water quality facility be built. The fee is based on the amount of impervious surface; for every 2640 square feet or portion thereof, the fee shall be $375.00. The City of Tigard determines $ a fee or facil ty shall be built. 4 ,i4 epP t. 4 i STREET OPENING PERMIT within No work tae obtained s street opening �rpertniit f ran the en til the applicant Engineering Department. FIN /SHED FLOOR ELEVATIONS On all projects that require a grading plan the applicant shall submit with the grading plan a typical floor plan for each lot which shall have the elevations of four corners of that plan along with elevations at the corner of each lot. PREPARED BY: ENGINEERING DIVISION PHONE: 639 -4171 ao PREAPP MST gi 'li wl Staff Date CITY OF TIGARD COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT APPLICATION CHECKLIST The items on the checklist below are required for the successful completion of your application submission requirements. This checklist identifies what is required to be submitted with your application. This sheet MUST be brought and submitted with all other materials at the time you submit your application. See your application for further explanation of these items or call Planning at 639-4171. BASIC MATERIALS ITEMS TO BE INCLUDED: A) Application form (1 copy) E 8) Owner's signature /written authorization E C) Title transfer instrument C / D) Assessor's map Cam' E) Plot or site plan E"/ F) ... App licant's statement Cam" 04 -t t-of -pv y- owne - & -addre ea--tuz hiff-2 C , (4) Filing fee ($.: g e SPECIFIC MATERIALS A) Site Information _ I:howin (No. of copies ) � 1) Vicinity Map 2) Site size & dimensions [3< 3) Contour lines (2 ft at 0-1O% or 5 ft for grades > 10%) l 4) Drainage patterns, courses, and ponds (a) 5) Locations of natural hazard a Flood P lain areas ard areas including: E b) Slopes in excess of 25% 1 3 c) Unstable ground E 7 d) Areas with high seasonal water table 1 3 e) Areas with e soil erosion potential 1 3 f) Areas having severely weak foundation soils [ ) Location of resource areas as shown on the Comprehensive Mon inventory including: a) Wildlife habitats C 1 b) Wetlands ( 1 Other site features: a) Rock outcroppings E b) Trees with 6" - ealiper measured 4 'Feet from ground level 0) Location of existing structures and their uses 1 9) Location and type of on and off -site noise sources 1. 10 Location , s and easements ) : n of existing utilities 11) Location of existing dedicated right -of -ways [1:7 Site Development Plan showing (No, of copies ;) 1 til 1) The proposed site and surrounding properties 2) Contour line intervals t 3) The location, dimensions m s. n f all: r a Existing �p latted streets names r public ways and easements on the site and oh adjoining [ properties APPLICATION CHECKLIST - Page 1 • b) Proposed streets or other public ways & easements on the site E.er c) Alternative routes of dead end or proposed streets that require future extension C 4) The location and dimension of: a) Entrances and exits on the site b) Parking and circulation areas c) Loadin and ervices areas d) Pedestrian and bicycle circulation g s e) Outdoor common areas, f) Above ground utilities NT 5) The location, dimensions & setback distances of all: a) Existing permanent structures, improvements, utilities and easements which are located on the f site e site and on adjacent property within 25 feet of the s b) Proposed structures, improvements, utilities and easements on the site 6) Storm drainage facilities iard-stnaiLy-s-i-s-orzt). downstrwamr-cundi-ffans 7) Sanitary eewer facilities 8) The location of areas to be landscaped 9) The location and type of outdoor lighting considering crime prevention techniques 111/ 10) The location of mailboxes 11) The location of all structures and their orientation ( 43- 12) Existing or proposed sewer reimbursement agreements [ ) C) TITALIgiligil (No of copies ) E The site development plan shall include a grading plan at the same scale as the site analysis drawings and shall contain the following information: 1) The location and extent to which grading will take place indicating general contour lines, slope ratios and soil stabilization propos41s, and time of year it is proposed to be done, tfr37 2) A statement from a registered engineer supported by data factual substantiating: a) Subsurface exploration and geotechnical engineering report b) The validity of sanitary sewer and storm drainage service proposals c) That all problems will be mitigated and how they will be mitigated D) Architectural Drawing! (No, of copies 60 ): The site development plan proposal shall include: 1) Floor plans indicating the square footage of all structures proposed for use on-eite: and 2) Typical elevation drawings of each structure, E) Laltilsagellan (No, of copies The landscape plan shall be drawn at the same scale of the site analysis plan or a larger scale if netessary and shall indicate: 1) Description of the irrigation system where applicable 2) Location and height of fences h buffers and screenings APPLICATION CHECKLIST - Page 2 3) Location of terraces, decks, shelters, play areas / and common open spaces 4) Location, type, size and species of existing and proposed plant materials. C The landscape plan shall include a narrative which addresses: 1) Soil conditions, C 3 2) Erosion control measures that will be used C 3 Sign Drawings Sign drawings shall be submitted in accordance, with Chapter 10.114 of the Code as part of Site Development Review or prior to obtaining a Building Permit to construct the sign. G) Traff =ic eneration estim C ] H) Preliminary partition or lot line adjustment ma1.showin (No. of Copies ) : 1) The owner of the subject parcel C 3 2) The owner's authorized agent t 3 3) The map scale, (20,50,100 or 200 feet =1), inch north arrow and date C 4) Description of parcel location and boundaries C 3 5) Location, width and names of streets, easements and other public ways within aid adjacent to the parcel ( a 6) Location of all permanent buildings on and within 25 feet of all property lines C 7) Location and width of all water courses C 3 8) Location of any trees with 6" or greater caliper at 4 feet above ground level C 1 9) All slopes greater than 25% L 10) Location of existing utilities and utility easements [ 3 11) For major land partition which creates a public street: a) The proposed right -of -way location and width C 1 b) A scaled cross - section of the proposed street plus any resepive strip C 3 12) Any applicable deed restrictions C 3 13) Evidence that land partition will not preclude efficient future land division where applicable . 1 1) subdivision Preliminar Plat Ma.. and data showinq(No, of Copies - ,,) : 1) Scale equaling 30,50,100 or 200 feet to the inch and limited to one phase per sheet E 2) 3) The roy osep name of the subdivision 3 Vicinity ma showing property's relationship to arterial and collector streets dresses and telephone dames, ad phone numbers of the owner developer, engineer, surveyer, designer, as applicable( j 5) of application C 1 6) lines of tract to be subdivided C 7) Boundary dames of adjacent subdivision or names of recorded owners of adjoining parcels ofaunsubdivided land 8) Contour lines related to a City- established bench mark at 2 -foot intervals for 0.10% grades greater than 10% C1 APPLICATION CHECKLIST - Page 3 ,b� C3 C1 9) The purpose, location, type and size o all of the following (within and adjacent to the proposed subdivision): [ ] a) Public and private right -of -ways and easements [ ] b) Public and private sanitary and storm sewer lines [ ] c) Domestic water mains including fire hydrants [ d) Major power telephone transmission lines (50000 volts or greater) C 3 e) Watercourses [ f) Deed reservations for parks, open space, pathways and other land encumbrances [ 3 10) Approximate plan and profiles of proposed sanitary and storm sewers with grades and pipe sizes indicated [ 3 11) Plan of the proposed water distribution system, showing pipe sizes and the location of valves and fire hydrants. 3 12) Approximate centerline profiles showing the finished grade of all streets including street extensions for a reasonable distance beyond the limits of the proposed subdivision, [ 3 13) Scaled cross sections of proposed street right -of --way; [ ] 14) The location of all areas subject to inundation or storm water overflow 1 3 15) Location, width and direction of flow of all water- courses and drainage ways 1 3 16) The Where plosJsa are lto to be used for purposes other than residential, it shall be indicated upon such lots [ 3 17) The location of all trees with a diameter 6 inches or greater measured at 4 feet above ground level, and the location of proposed tree plantings, if any 1 3 18) The existing uses of the property, including the location of all structures and the present uses of the structures, and a statement of which structures are to remain after platting [ 3 19) Supplemental information including: a) Proposed deed restrictions (if any) 1 3 b) Proof of property ownership 1 3 c) A proposed plan for provision of subdivision improvements [ 3 26) Existing natural features including rock Out- croppings, wetlands and marsh areas. [ 21) xf any of the foregoing information cannot practicably be shown on the preliminary plat, it shall be incorporated into a narrative and submitted with the application. [ 3 (2362P/0028P) APPLICATION CH CKL /ST - Page 4 STEPHENSON FAFFLE KFILI E 0 DURHAM 'TUALATIN iivergrove BORLAND 041 frimoi n ELY qaftwe • '-° • * ige th AV. LO (. aftalts 11=0) P- 0 a - STATE OF OREGON County of Washington City of Tigard 40011A.4 depoee and say: (P IIMINVEIOSIMMISEM AFFIDAVIT OF MAXLING ease print) That I am a The City of Tigard, Oregon. 1 , being first duly sworn/affirm, on oath X.' That X served VOTICE OF PUBLIC HEARING VOR: That I oerved NOTICE OF DECISION FOR: City of Tigard Planning Director Tigard Planning Commiorion Tigard Hearings Officer Tigard City Council A copy (Public Hearing Notice/Notice of Decqiion) of which is attached (Marked Exhibit "Ar') was mailed to each named mions at the ad rens shown on the attached list marked exhibit "B" on the g1,....,_ day of "a'-u 19 /1.-, said notice NOTICE OF DECISION as heretq attached, was poste on an appropriate bulletin board on the ja day of ,21:-)11 4 19_12:11 and deposited in the United States Mail on the ...21.1.2 day of .14.....„.,,„ , 19,5==_, postage prepaid. Prepared otice 170' gubs ribed and sworn/affirm to me on the o9 f-- day of 19 ARY PUDLX try Commission Expires: • 1S134DS -00200 CARNAHAN, CECIL K EDITH 10985 SW NORTH DAKOTA ST TIGARD OR 97223 Xiry� I� JIJ:tO YJABAK J'... T2 " ,OAAO STROM fa 8 eor 1S134DB -02600 WINTERS, MARVIN F /JOANN % M THIS, MICHAEL K /SARAH E 11280 SW NORTH DAKOTA TIGARD OR 97223 13134DB -02700 GORDON, RUTH F AND DONALD K 1y 230 SW NORTH DAKOTA ST TIGARD OR 97223 18134D0 -02800 TORLAND, ARTHUR N / BESSIE 8520 SW AVERY ST TIALATIN OR 97062 13134DB -02900 ...................•• STROM, DORGHILD 24 11170 SW NORTH DAKOTA SW TIGARD OR 97223 18134Di3 -03000 TORLAND, ARTHUR N 8520 SW AVERY ROAD TUALATIN OR 97062 1S134DB -03100 ... CLARK, MARIE M 11140 SW NORTH DAKOTA TIGARD OR 97223 1S124DB -03200 TORLAND, JULIAN G, TRUSTEE - 11100 SW NORTH DAKOTA TIGARD OR 97223 1S134DB -03300 SILKY, ADELINE 11060 SW NORTH DAKOTA TIGARD OR 97223 13134D0-03400 ESPY, BRENT E & GEORGIA L 11030 SW NORTH DAKOTA PORTLAND OR 97223 1S134DB -03500 LIVINGSTON, KAY W BESSIE E 10970 SW NORTH DAKOTA TIGARD OR 97223 1S134DB-- 03600 4444 BROWER, RONALD RAY BROWER, HELEN C BROWER, ROGER E 10940 SW NORTH DAKOTA TIGARD OR 97223 18134DB,43800 TOWERY, DAVID B /LAURIE L 10920 SW NORTH DAKOTA ST TIGARD OR 97223 1S134DB -03700 LIVINGSTON, KAY W BESSIE 10970 SW NORTH DAKOTA TIGARD OR 97223 1S134DB... 3900 e a .. _ 4•4•0 JERGESi N, KEITH F & MARIE J 11185 SW 109TH AVE TIGARD OR 97223 15134DB -04000 BARE, JUDITH A 11165 SW 109TH AVE TIGARD OR 97223 ... 1S134D0 -04100 .. ..... FRY, VERNON L & JEANNETTE A 11125 NW 109TH AVE TIGARD OR 97223 1,? 181346t-04200 LtJZA, ?lick EL P 11105 sW 109TH T OAAD OR 97223 181341)11-04300 BRAS STUART K 6. SD1ARON W 11085 so 109Th TIGARD OR 97223 4' it ter - O 1S134DB- -04400 WILSON, RTC JAMES & PAMELA DIANE 11065 SW 109TH. TIGARD 3911. 97223 1S134DS- 05100 MIGUELINO, BEN 8 AND S LDALENI 3257 ARROYO DR FAIRFIELD CA 94533 1S134AC -02300 7RART ", JOSEPH 7 AND MARY R 10993 SW NORTH DAKOTA ST TIGARD OR 97223 18134AC- -02628 HALLETT, JAMES A MARGARET 11135 SW COTTONWOOD LANE TIGARD OR 97223 1S134AC -02630 .444.4•.4444.4* UULTEEN, IRVING R 30 CRESTLINE OR APT #3 SAN FRANCISCO CA 94131 1S134AC- .02632 AGOon, EDWARD 47 T /BARI't% RA J 11095 SW COTTONWOOD LUZ TIGAI.D OR 97223 1S134AC- -0263: TRUNE, DENiaS Q AND TARA L 11075 SW COTTONWOOD LN TIGARD OR 97223 JESPERSEN, O 18134A0-,02651 TTO 6s DECOKES E 11110 SW COTTONWOOD LN TIGARD OR -97223 1S134D8 - -00201 HART, KATHERINE 10993 SW NORTH DAKOTA TIGARD 0i 97223 1SI34DB -05000 BRYANT, DONALD P & LISA 14295 SW MASSOUVELLO RD MCMINNVILLE OR 97128 1S134DB -00400 ELLSON, WALLACE C VIOLET K 11225 SW NORTH DAKOTA TIGARD OR 97223 18134A0-02500 ELLSON, LE ROY L JUDITE E 10995 SW NORTH DAKOTA ST TIGARD OR 97223 18134A0- -02629 LEVINE, EUGENE P & CHRISTINA R 5720 TOTH PLACE AGOURA HILLS CA 91301 1S134AC -02631 DUCHARME, ROGER G CORRINE E 11105 SW COTTONWOOD LN TIGARD OR 97223 10134AC- 42633 4:44444e ADAMS, MXCHI LEN% 8462 DEEPCLIPF DA HUNTINGTON BEACH CA 92646 4 . I 1S114AC -02650 HAYNES, KENNETH R & KELLY D 11080 SW COTTONWOOD LANE TIGARD OR 97223 1S130A -0000 444444444444444444444 WIMHER, WARREN It AND 00A 11 10900 SW NH DAKOTA ST TIGARD OR 97223 JOHN STARK LEE - RUFF - STARK ARCHITECTS 5285 SW MEADOWS ROAD *340 LAKE OSWEGO OR 97035 1.; .00 • • - ':;•, CHURCH OF JESUS CHRIST OF LATTER—DAY SAINTS 50 E TEMPLE ST SALT LIKE CITY UT 84150 • • NOTICE OF PUBLIC HEARING NOTICE IS HEREBY GIVEN THAT THE TIGARD PLANNING COMMISSION, AT ITS MEETING ON MONDAY, _Aggust 17 1992 , AT 2122 PM, IN THE TOWN HALL OF THE TIGARD CIVIC CENTER, 13125 SW HALL BLVD., TIGARD, OREGON, WILL CONSIDER THE FOLLOWING APPLICATION: FILE NO: CUP 92-0002/PDR 92-0004 FILE TITLE: Latter-Day Saints/Stark APPLICANT: John Stark Lee/Ruff/Stark Architects 5285 SW Meadowb Road #340 Lake Oswego, OR 97035 NPO NO: 7 OWNER: Church of Jesus ChrLst of Latter-Day Saints 50 E. North Temple St, Salt Lake City, UT 84150 REQUEST: CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT _0E292-0002 PLANNED DEVELOPMENT PAR 92-0004 LATTER-DAY SAINTS STARK (NPO #7) A request for ConditiCiarrig;TiriEned Development Review approval to construct a church building of approximately 17,000 square feet, a storage building of approximately 300 square feet, related off-street parking, and other site improvements on a 5.3 acre oite. APPLICABLE APPROVAL CRITERIA: Community Development Code Chapters 18.50, 18.80, 18.96, 18.98, 18.100, 18.102, 18.106, 18.108, 18.120, 18.130, 18.144, 18.150, 18.164; and Comprehensive Plan Policies 2.1.1, 4.2.1, 7.1.2, 7.3.1, 7.4.4, and 8.1.3. LOCATION: 11065 SW North Dakota Street (WCTM 181 34DB, tax lot 300) ZONE: R-4.5 (PD) (ReSidential, 4.5 unite/acre, Planned Development) The R-4.5 zone allows single family residential Units, public support facilities, residential treatment homeS, farming' temporary uses, and accessory structures among other Uses. THE PUBLIC HEARING ON THIS MATTER WILL BE CONDUCTED IN ACCORDANCE WITH THE RULES OF CHAPTER 18.32 OP THE COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT CODE AND RULES OF PROCEDURE ADOPTED BY THE TIGARD CITY cow= AND AVAXLABLE AT CITY HALL, OR RULES OF PROCEDURE SET FORTH IN CHAPTER 18430, ANYONE WISHING TO PRESENT WRITTEN TESTIMONY ON THIS PROPOSED ACTION MAY DO SO IN WRITING PRIOR TO OR AT THE PUBLIC HEARING. ORAL TESTIMONY MAY BE PRESENTED AT THE PUBL/C HEARING. AT THE PUBLIC HEARING, THE PLANNING COMMISSION WILL RECIEVE A STAFF REPORT PRESENTATION PROM THE CITY PLANNER: OPEN THE PUBLIC HEARING; AND INVITE BOTH ORAL MID WRITTEN TESTIMONY. THE PLANNING COMMISSION MAY CONTINUE THE PUBLIC HEARING TO ANOTHER MEETING TO OBTAIN ADDITIONAL INFORMATION, OR CLOSE THE PUBLIC HEARING AND TAKE ACTION ON THE APPLICATION. 11 A PERSON SUBMITS EVIDENCE IN SUPPORT TO THE APPLICATION AFTER UIN 28, 1992 ANY PARTY IS ENTITLED TO REQUEST A CONTINUANCE OF THE HEAING. IF THERE IS NO CONTINUANCE GRANTED AT THE HEARING, ANY PART/CIPANT IN THE HEARING MAY REQUEST THAT THE RECORD REMAIN OPEN FOR AT LEAST SEVEN DAYS AFTER THE HEARING. • [Page Too Large for OCR Processing] Tos`124. A-Polekd MORT_FoR COMMENTS DATE: _2111/224_1992 FROM Tigard Planning Department RE: CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT CUP 92-0002 PLANNED DEVELOPMENT PDR 92-0004 LATTER-DAY SAINTS. STARK (NPO #7) A request for Conditionaf-EG7Planned Development conceptual plan approval to construct a church building of approximately 17,000 Square feet and a storage building of approximately 300 square feet with a related off-street parking development. APPLICABLE REVIEW CRITERIA: Community Development Code Chapters 18.50, 18.96, 18.98, 18.100, 18.102, 18.106, 18.108, and 18.130. LOCATION: 11065 SW North Dakota Street (WCTM 181 34DB, tax lot 300) ZONE: R-4.5 (PD) (Residential, 4.5 Unita/acre, Planned Development) The R-4.5 zone allows single family residential units, public support facilities, residential treatment homes, farming, temporary uses, and accessory structures among other Uses. Attached is the Site Plan and applicant's statement for your review. From information supplied by various departments and agencies and from other information available to our staff, a report and recommendation will be prepared and a decision will be rendered on the proposal in the near future. If yoU wish to comment on this application, we need your comments by Agg,2, 1992. You may 1198 the space provided below or attach a separate letter to return your comment°. Ilott,_AKELLumAAe_atiLliy_the above date please phone the staff contact noted below with your comments and confirm your comments in writing as soon as possible. If you have any questions regarding this matter, contact the Tigard Planning Department, PO Bo X 23397, 13125 SW Hall Blvd., Tigard, OR 97223. PHONE: 639,-4171. STAFF CONTACT: Jerry Offer PLEASE CHECK THE FOLLOWING ITEMS THAT APPLY: We have reviewed the proposal and have no objections to it. Please contact of our offiCe. Please refer to the enclosed letter. Written Comments: Name of Person Commenting: Phone Number: bkm/CUP9242.BKM l;�Se1! 1� . 2. NPO NO. ( piNeOTTFICATION LIST FOR ALL APPLICATIONS CITY DEPARTMENTS '` Building Official /Brad R.r City Recorder ,,::,.,.+"Engineering /Chris D. '"- Permite Coordinator/Viola G. 3. SPECIAL 7ICTS Fire District (Pick -up box) Tigard Water District 0777 SW Burnham St., Tigard, OR 97223 Tualatin valley Water Dintrict 6501 SW Taylors Perry Ltd. Tigard, OR 97223 4. AFFECTED JURISDICTIONS Waal'. Co. Land Ueze 4 Tranep. 150 N. First Ave. Hilinboro, OR 97124 Brent Curtis `—` Kevin Martin -""' Joann Rice Scott King Fred Eberle Mike Borrenon City of Beaverton Jim Hendryx PO Box 4755 Beaverton, OR 97076 City of King City City Manager 15300 SW 116th King City, OR 97224 City of Lake Oswego City Manager 300 SW A Lake Owego, OR 97034 State Highway Division Bob Doran PO Box 25412 Portland, OR 97225 -0412 5. deneral Telephone SPECIAL AGENCIES lephone [a 12460 SW Rime Well St. igard, OR 97223 if , NW Natbral Gan Scott Palmer 220 NO Second Ave. Portland, OR 97209 -- TCI Cablevision of Oregon Mike Ballryck 3500 SW Bend St. Portland, OR 97201 Columbia Cable (Prank Stone) 14200 SW Drigadoon Ct. Be>,averte+r, OR 97005 6. sTATF AGENCIES AerchaUtica Div. (ODOT) Engineer Board of health Pish & Wildlife Parke & Recreation Div. _ SUbdivialion Supervisor Dept. of Energy Dept. of Environ. QUality 7. FEDERAL !AGENCIES Corps. of Engineers Post Office OTHER southern Pacific Tranecortation Company Duane M. Porney, PLS - Project Engineer 000 NW 6th Avenue, R. 324, Union Station Portland; OR 97209 arks 6 Recreation Board olico Operations � , School Dist No. 40 (Beaverton) Joy Pahl PO Box 200 eaverton, OR 07075 School Diet. 23J (Tigard) 13137 SW Pacific Hwy. Tigard, OR 97223 Boundary Coawieeion -- -- 320 SW Stark Roost 530 Portland, OR 97204 METRO 2000 SW fait ave. Portland, OR 97201 -5390 . o +++...JJJ . DLCD (CPA's only) 1175 Court St. NE Salem, OR 97310 -0590 O t h e r City of Durham City Manager 17160 SW Upper Boone* Ferry Rd. Tigard, OR 97224 City of Portland Planning Director 1120 SW 5th Portland, OR 97204 Portland General Elec. Brian Moore 14655 SW Old Scholle Pry. ,00 Beaverton, OR 97007 ••+° Metro Area Communications Jason Hewitt TWIn Oake Technology Center 1015 NW 169th Place 8-6020 Beaverton, OR 97006 -4006 US West Pete Nelson 421 Rid Oak St, Portland, OR 97204 poGAMI Diviairat of State Lands demmerce Dept. - M.d. Park LCDC POO Piro Marshall Other M - Other 4' [Page Too Large for OCR Processing] [Page Too Large for OCR Processing] [Page Too Large for OCR Processing] [Page Too Large for OCR Processing] [Page Too Large for OCR Processing] [Page Too Large for OCR Processing] [Page Too Large for OCR Processing] [Page Too Large for OCR Processing] [Page Too Large for OCR Processing] [Page Too Large for OCR Processing] [Page Too Large for OCR Processing] [Page Too Large for OCR Processing] [Page Too Large for OCR Processing] [Page Too Large for OCR Processing] [Page Too Large for OCR Processing] [Page Too Large for OCR Processing] [Page Too Large for OCR Processing] [Page Too Large for OCR Processing] [Page Too Large for OCR Processing]