Loading...
SLR1995-00005 SLR95 00005 BONITA BRIDGE WIDENING CITY OF TIGARD Washington County, Oregon EXHIBIT A A NOTICE OF FINAL ORDER a BY THE HEARINGS OFFICER CITY OF TIGARD OREGON Concerning Case Number(s): SENSITIVE LANDS REVIEW (SLR) 95-0005 Name of Owner: City of Tigard Name of Applicant: Same Address of Applicant: 13125 SW Hall Boulevard City: Tigard State: Oregon Zip: 97223 Address of Property.- SW Bonita Road crossing of Fanno Creek City.- Tigard State: Oregon Zip: 97223 Request ► A request for Sensitive Lands Review approval to allow the widening of a bridge over Fanno Creek from 30 feet to 60 feet, located on SW Bonita Road. LOCATION: SW Bonita Road crossing of Fanno Creek. APPLICABLE REVIEW CRITERIA: Community Development Code Sections 18.84. Zone: I-L (Light Industrial). The Light Industrial zoning allows public support facilities, building maintenance services, manufacturing of finished products, packaging and processing, wholesale, storage, and distribution, among other uses. Action ► ® Approval as requested I Approval with conditions H Denial Notice: Notice was published in the newspaper, posted at City Hall and mailed to: ® Owners of record within the required distance ® Affected governmental agencies ® The affected Citizen Involvement Team Facilitator ® The applicant and owner(s) THE DECISION SHALL BE FINAL ON MAY 31, 1995 UNLESS AN APPEAL IS FILED Final Decision The adopted findings of fact, decision and statement of conditions can be obtained from the City of Tigard Planning Department, Tigard City Hall, 13125 SW Hall Boulevard, Tigard, Oregon 97223. Appeal: Any party to the decision may appeal this decision in accordance with 18.32.290 (B) and Section 18.32.370, which provides that a written appeal may be filed within ten (10) days after notice is given and sent. The appeal may be submitted on City forms and must be accompanied by the appeal feels) of $315.00 plus transcript costs, not in excess of $500.00. THE DEADLINE FOR FILING OF AN APPEAL IS 3:30 P.M. ON MAY 31, 1995 Questions: If you have any questions, please call the City of Tigard Planning Department at (503) 639-4171. NOTICE OF FINAL ORDER BY THE HEARING'S OFFICER SLR 95-0005 BONITA BRIDGE WIDENING BEFORE THE LAND USE HEARINGS OFFICER FOR THE CITY OF TIGARD, OREGON Regarding an application by the City of Tigard for a ) FINAL ORDER sensitive lands review to alter land in a 100-year floodplain ) to widen the Bonita Road brige over Fanno Creek ) SLR 95-0005 in the City of Tigard, Oregon ) (Bonita Road Bridge) I. FINDINGS ABOUT SITE, SURROUNDINGS AND PUBLIC FACILITIES The hearings officer incorporates by reference the findings about the site and surroundings in Sections I and II of the City of Tigard Staff Reported dated May 1, 1995 (the "Staff Report") and the agency comments in Section IV of the Staff Report. II. APPLICABLE APPROVAL STANDARDS AND RESPONSIVE FINDINGS The hearings officer incorporates by reference the approval standards and the findings in response to them in Section III of the Staff Report. III. HEARING AND RECORD 1. Hearings Officer Larry Epstein received testimony at the public hearing about this application on May 8, 1995. A record of that testimony is included herein as Exhibit A (Parties of Record), Exhibit B (Taped Proceedings), and Exhibit C (Written Testimony). These exhibits are tiled at the Tigard City Hall. 2. City planner Will D'Andrea and City engineer Michael Anderson summarized the Staff Report. No one else appeared in person or in writing. IV. SITE VISIT BY HEARINGS OFFICER The hearings officer visited the site and surrounding area. He observed the existing access to and structures,vegetation, and grades on the site and adjoining property and the condition of the adjoining streets. V. CONCLUSION AND DECISION 1. The hearings officer concludes that the proposed Sensitive Lands Review complies with the applicable criteria and standards of the Community Development Code, provided development that occurs after this decision complies with applicable local, state, and federal laws. 2. In recognition of the findings and conclusions contained herein, and incorporating the Staff Report and other reports of effect agencies and public testimony and exhibits received in this matter, the Hearings Officer hereby approves SLR 95-0005. P • D i s 1 l th day of 995. Larry Epstein, • CI' City of Tigar: Heirinlof officer AGENDA ITEM 2.1 BEFORE THE LAND USE HEARINGS OFFICER FOR THE CITY OF TIGARD, OREGON Regarding an application by the City of Tigard STAFF REPORT to widen a bridge over Fanno Creek from 30 feet SLR 95-0005 to 60 feet, located on SW Bonita Road. This development is within the 100-year floodplain. I. SUMMARY OF THE REQUEST BONITA BRIDGE WIDENING CASE: Sensitive Lands Review SLR 95-0005 SUMMARY: A request for Sensitive Lands Review to widen an existing bridge over Fanno Creek from 30 feet to 60 feet, located on SW Bonita Road. The bridge is located within the 100-year floodplain. APPLICANTS: City of Tigard OWNER: Same 13125 SW Hall Blvd. Tigard, OR 97223 COMPREHENSIVE PLAN DESIGNATION: I-L (Light Industrial) ZONING DESIGNATION: I-L (Light Industrial) LOCATION: SW Bonita Road crossing of Fanno Creek. East of SW 76th Avenue and west of SW 74th Avenue. APPLICABLE LAW: Community Development Code Chapter 18.84. Comprehensive Plan Policies 2.1.1, 3.2.1, 3.2.2, 3.5.4, 4.2.1 STAFF RECOMMENDATION: Approval. II. SITE AND VICINITY Ii iFORMATION A. Background Information: No other development applications have been filed with the City of Tigard. B. Site Information and Proposal Description: - The area of the proposed work is east of the intersection of SW Bonita Road and SW 76th Avenue and west of the intersection of SW Bonita Road and SW 74th Avenue. The proposed work is on both sides of the bridge within the SW Bonita Road right-of- way. The area to be effected is covered with blackberry bushes. No structures are located in the area with exception of the existing bridge and roadway. The existing bridge does not meet current standards for lane and shoulder width and does not have adequate pedestrian sidewalks, with one sidewalk on the south side of the bridge. The applicant proposes to widen the existing 30 foot wide bridge to a width of 60 feet. The widening will be accomplished by removing the existing railings, curbs, sidewalk, and asphalt roadway and extending the existing structure to the north aproximately 16 feet and to the south approximately 13 feet. Three new steel pipe piles will be added at each end of each existing pile bent, and three new steel pipe piles will be added at each end of each existing abutment. The new steel pipe piles will be the same outside diameter as the piles under the existing structure. The proposal requires a sensitive lands permit as the pilings will be located within the 100-year floodplain of Fanno Creek. C. Vicinity Information: The adjacent properties to the northeast and southeast are zoned I-L (Light Industrial), property to the northwest and southwest are zoned R-12 (Residential, 12 units per acre). The surrounding area is developed with a mix of residential and industrial uses. III. APPLICABLE APPROVAL STANDARDS AND REQUEST EVALUATION A. COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT CODE: Chapter 18.84 contains regulations for lands within 100-year floodplains that are subject to Sensitive Lands Review. Sensitive Lands Review of proposed developments in these areas is intended to implement floodplain protection measures and to protect rivers,streams and creeks by minimizing erosion, promoting bank stability,maintaining and enhancing water quality and fish and wildlife habitat, and preserving scenic quality HEARINGS OFFICER - SLR 95-0005 - BONITA BRIDGE / CITY OF TIGARD Paget and recreational potential. Section 18.84.015(E) requires Hearings Officer approval for a Sensitive Lands Permit within the 100-year floodplain. Chapter 18.84.040(A) states that the appropriate approval authority shall approve or approve with conditions an application request within the 100-year floodplain in subsections 18.84.015(B) and (E) based upon findings that all of the following criteria have been satisfied: 1. Land form alterations shall preserve or enhance the floodplain storage function and maintenance of the zero-foot rise floodway shall not result in any encroachments, including fill, new construction, substantial improvements, and other development unless certified by a registered professional engineer that the encroachment will not result in any increase in flood levels during the base flood discharge. The applicant's hydraulic analysis concluded that water surface elevations for existing and proposed bridge conditions indicate no change in the 100-year floodplain due to proposed changes in the bridge. 2. Land form alterations or developments within the 100-year floodplain shall be allowed only in areas designated as commercial or industrial on the comprehensive plan land use map, except that alterations or developments associated with community recreation uses, utilities, or public support facilities as defined in Chapter 18.42 of the Community Development Code shall be allowed in areas designated residential subject to applicable zoning standards. The Comprehensive Plan designation for this parcel is I-L (Light Industrial). 3. Where a land form alteration or development is permitted to occur within the floodplain it will not result in any increase in the water surface elevation of the 100-year flood. The applicant's hydraulic analysis concluded that water surface elevations for existing and proposed bridge conditions indicate no change in the 100-year floodplain due to proposed changes in the bridge. 4. The land form alteration or development plan includes a pedestrian/bicycle pathway in accordance with the adopted pedestrian/bicycle pathway plan, unless the construction of said HEARINGS OFFICER - SLR 95-0005 - BONITA BRIDGE / CITY OF TIGARD Page3 pathway is deemed by the Hearing Officer as untimely. The bridge will incorporate a shoulder suitable for bicycle traffic. SW Bonita Road is not designated as a proposed pedestrian/bicycle path as contained in the Tigard Parks Master Plan. 5. The plans for the pedestrian/bicycle pathway indicate that no pathway will be below the elevation of an average annual flood. This proposal does not contain a plan for a pathway. 6. The necessary U.S. Army Corps of Engineers and State of Oregon Land Board, Division of State Lands approvals shall be obtained. The City has recieved comments from both the Army Corps of Engineers and Division of State Lands and permits were not required by either agency. 7. Where land form alterations and/or development are allowed within and adjacent to the 100-year floodplain, the City shall require the dedication of sufficient open land area within and adjacent to the floodplain in accordance with the comprehensive plan. This proposal is on public right-of-way and does not contain property which could be be dedicated for pathway purposes. Chapter 18.84.040(C) states that the Director shall approve or approve with conditions an application request for a sensitive lands permit within drainageways based upon findings that all of the following criteria has been satisfied: 1. The extent and nature of the proposed land form alteration or development will not create site disturbances to the extent greater than that required for the use. The disturbance is the minimum disturbance necessary to accomodate the bridge widening. The installation of the piling will occur from the bridge and will therefore reduce the extent of site disturbances. 2. The proposed land form alteration or development will not result in erosion, stream sedimentation, ground instability, or other adverse on-site and off-site effects or hazards to life or property. Construction will require an erosion control plan, approved by the Engineering Department, in conformance with Unified Sewerage Agency Resolution and Order 91-47. HEARINGS OFFICER - SLR 95-0005 - BONITA BRIDGE / CITY OF TIGARD Page4 3. The water flow capacity of the drainageway is not decreased. The hydraulic analysis concluded that the capacity of the drainageway, as well as the flooplain will be be decreased or negatively impacted. 4. Where natural vegetation has been removed due to land form alteration or development, the areas not covered by structures or impervious surfaces will be replanted to prevent erosion in accordance with Chapter 18.100, Landscaping and Screening. The minimal amount of vegetation loss expected with construction will be hydroseeded. Erosion control measures shall also be taken during construction. The applicants construction plans shall be reviewed and approved by the Engineering Department. 5. The drainageway will be replaced by a public facility of adequate size to accommodate maximum flow in accordance with the adopted 1981 Master Drainage Plan. This requirement is not applicable as the drainageway will not be impaired by the bridge's construction. 6. The necessary U.S. Army Corps of Engineers and State of Oregon Land Board, Division of State Lands approvals shall be obtained. As discussed in the previous section. permits are not required. 7. Where landform alterations and/or development are allowed within and adjacent to the 100-year floodplain, the City shall require the dedication of sufficient open land area within and adjacent to the floodplain in accordance with the Comprehensive Plan. This area shall include portions of a suitable elevation for the construction of a pedestrian/bicycle pathway within the floodplain in accordance with the adopted pedestrian bicycle pathway plan. As discussed in the previous section. dedication is not required. B. COMPREHENSIVE PLAN POLICIES. 1. Policy 2.1.1 provides the City will assure that citizens will be provided an opportunity to participate in all phases of the planning and development review process. Policy 2.1.1 is satisfied because the applicant held a neighborhood meeting. notice of the application and public hearing on this item was provided to owners of property in the vicinity of the site and in a HEARINGS OFFICER - SLR 95-0005 - BONITA BRIDGE / CITY OF TIGARD PageS newspaper of general circulation. The site has also been posted with a sign which states that a sensitive lands review application is pending for this property. 2. Policy 3.2.1 provides that the City will prohibit any development within the 100-year floodplain that would result in any rise in elevation of the 100-year floodplain. Policy 3.2.1 is satisfied because this proposal will not result in any rise in the elevation of the 100-year tlooplain. 3. Policy 3.2.2 provides that the City shall prohibit development in the floodway, except if the alteration preserves or enhances the function and maintenance of the zero-foot rise floodway. Policy 3.2.2 is satisfied because this development will preserve the function and maintenance of the zero-foot rise floodway. 4. Policy 3.5.4 provides that the City provide an interconnected pedestrian/bikepath throughout the City. Policy 3.5.4 is satisfied because this bridge will accommodate a pedestrian/bikeway system. 5. Policy 4.2.1 provides that all development within the Tigard Urban Planning Area shall comply with applicable federal, state and regional water quality standards. Policy 4.2.1 shall be satisified as construction shall comply with erosion control measures for the Tualatin River Basin. IV. AGENCY COMMENTS 1. The City of Tigard Engineering Department has reviewed the proposal and has provided the following comments: The Engineering Department has no objection to approval of the application. The CDC at 18.84.040 A. 1. requires that "land form alterations shall preserve or enhance the floodplain storage function and maintenance of the zero-foot rise floodway shall not result in any narrowing of the floodway boundary". The applicant has submitted construction plans showing that landform alterations are limited to the installation of twelve 12-3/4" diameter steel pipe pilings for the bridge. Installation will be from the bridge, eliminating the need of entry into the floodplain by construction equipment. Alterations at the HEARINGS OFFICER - SLR 95-0005 - BONITA BRIDGE / CITY OF TIGARD Page6 bridge abutments are less than 50 cubic yards and include a retaining wall to ensure slope stability. Accordingly, the zero-foot rise tloodway will remain unaltered. Paragraph three of this subsection requires that land form alterations in the floodplain "will not result in any increase in the water surface elevation of the 100-year flood." The applicant has submitted an engineering study "Hydraulic Analysis of Fanno Creek at the Bonita Road Bridge to Assess Hydraulic Impacts of Proposed Bridge Widening, February 20, 1995." This study evaluated the change of the elevation of the 100-year flood in accordance with the City's Drainage Master Plan and concluded that the proposed bridge would not result in any change of the elevation of the 100-year flood. Similarly, the approval criteria of subsection c., drainageways are met: 1) Eliminating the need for equipment entry into the floodplain by installing the piles from the bridge will ensure that site disturbances are of no greater extent than required; 2) This will also ensure that erosion, stream sedimentation, ground instability, or other adverse effects will not result. Construction will require an erosion control plan, approved by the Engineering Department, in conformance with Unified Sewerage Agency Resolution and Order 91-47; 3) As previously mentioned, the submitted study shows that the capacity of the drainageway, as well as the floodplain, is not decreased; 4) Vegetation removal will be limited to blackberries. Any ground left uncovered will be restored with grass. 2. The City of Tigard Public Works Department, Building Division and Police Department have reviewed this proposal and have no objections to this proposal. 3. The U.S. Army Corps of Engineers and Division of State Lands have reviewed this proposal and have no objections to this proposal. 4. The Unified Sewerage Agency states that surface runoff, during and post construction. should be treated before it is allowed to discharge into Fanno Creek. Engineers written cerification should include his statement that the project as designed will cause no change in the water surface elevation during a 100-year storm event. 5. No additional comments have been recieved. VI. CONCLUSION AND RECOMMENDATION HEARINGS OFFICER - SLR 95-0005 - BONITA BRIDGE / CITY OF TIGARD Pagel Staff concludes that the proposed impacts to Sensitive Lands Areas comply with the applicable approval criteria for issuance of a Sensitive Lands Permit. Staff recommends the approval of SLR 95-0005. THIS APPROVAL SHALL BE VALID FOR EIGHTEEN MONTHS OF THE EFFECTIVE DATE OF THIS DECISION. Prepared by: /6, �24 /)az vc �►c 5/1/95 William D'Andrea Date Assistant Planner Approved by: ( JL R-- 5/1/95 Dick Bewersdorff W1-1- Date Senior Planner HEARINGS OFFICER - SLR 95-0005 - BONITA BRIDGE / CITY OF TIGARD Page8 I . •' 7 ...... d z F) SW HALL BLVD ___----- . .• 10(.0 . -I 111 z pi•• L ,-)76r) 0 N NV 3 (7.) ) 0 __________________ •-v, . c ___-1 .---0 23 0 ... 6 1-*1 '\/> • \6) ril CD M C/ (2‘-' orri o "r1 FANNO -- —I ',....-••,"\s,I----- • -LI . Z ----I----1—I—A--1----1—1--1 ---4,11. 11 W 72ND AV 0 t __,-- / . - sw 72ND AV 6), r......\\\.) XI . C) in 0 1) 0 _ -- ..---4 < I WASHINGTON CO. (in I CL ACI<M AS CO. 'c.-- o k• 1 z ).e.....4 P---1- > _____ _______________ ____, - _ I 0). C C 1 P 1 --1 i-- . r -C r• I I 40i :I: 11 -1 0 < •• Xl I f oz' - 1 i_i PI _i •• Li 0 C) -N•-,NN- N.N - I 1 0> fc-C3 E 1 x)0 —A Z / ''. -,•,,__ J 4: _ __ NIL 1--• Z IsJ •.)..- •‹ 7 (6) --1 --1 0• ' — .......--. .., ,....., . f Q, W fll '-- ..,.. C) 0 .r- C 1- Z 1— Z o IS'I-4-• (7) 7t) is t4 I 7 . . .. eooU L C) C f` S ' ' ) c� 0v G Y k-,_,, ni q� lti XI o i- -' 0 (4') (, )• 0 ,: ;o 0v J .... r! �l n ) u -1 0 z in A Z fn it)' ni Z Z 'i �0 -< tp n 'j 0 Ian i ( ) Pi Z O -11 / I 3 V - ,C1 I C. 1'1 - ��•-�- \mac— 9)•-E1" 1 1� P1 X -� I2B TOP Of FIG — c --- Al (/) `, '� El. 1?7 SIGEwAEK� N \ .1 / y Z NE'IOCAIE [x151 `` - POST SIECt ,�) ` ---� --_ lllx ITY CUND11115 - 1 � NAJ►uw ('tr) ` 1 y� O� ~J _- NEf WAIL r REARVEO Ex151. / / // //' ` TOP EI. 1 � N. -� GIYWOftAIC k CURB J) ! { y In 2J - 1 L -I - {�2- 0 Z. I \ 1 imam([WSI. ASPtI �� C. f b l . n i II \ 1 I I I I I w/AS�t�N�i�„. ARAC[ z 1 3 su la ACOEN AT. 0 C) ai i cl 0 1 \ 1 S.W. BON1 TA ROAD r - ,/ �) WIDENED NowWAr. 0 ,I I a ► I -1 -1 -- --- -1-- I I - Ili--, - r II I ? C) I �I EDGE Ui 1 1 1 6kILGE WED Ir//J. < PA`Ent / / \ \ -�1 I l� r I ■ 1 III U) - _ —. �. - — v --/— - — — !iil 7-Z - - - - - - -- — — -- -I- -1 I -- /.= l 11 J -1" 1 � - 1 - E„ > u)0 0L � 1 1 ( � � �/ / I ` �J r*i i) -> c f� o - - !, .:..�>�. -- ��� -- A. it DNIDErAf 1� n 1*1 - • p I I GUARDED EXIST. o I fV )' C) < L k SIDCIK f , IOCAI[I4SI Ufa. won! r1 . SIDEWALK J 1 It - 13 o o o ), ,� 1 / V 9,\ // 0 z O < Z [A ,� `SIEEE '� I7B-- — O )Sa— �>� c I P. CotMC A] fn ' NAILING COP. COWL ABU rNEtt t (fYP) CO ;p i')-1 4� PILE CAP (I1P) � ONSA� O O O y+ 0z !Nmo L.i w ffi < o 10 20 ►1 Z l.' z Scala in F eel LO i --- 1 . (J (-) "0 D 0 C --1 Z ;) C. n -0 S ;110 •• r'l(n Z l II •• C) (11 6 ;T) ,7 6 m to n r.) 012 'C) C) (Ti rn X Z C) o 0 m o m co Y) '1 r,-) ra h v Z 41 SIDEWALK z 4i S1EEL TUBE .- _. z w „� ti us �� RAIIIUG (1 P)L id 511EL POST (TYP) m 1 u a v a �_ 3'['-O" u'Q 32'-0" w w 32'-0" f r 135' C.I P. CONC. ( „�\ 1-....] ABU IMEN E EL. APPROX. 125.0 1 (TYP)-- I'PRECAST CONC. ON JAN. 6, 1995 C I.P. CONC. I • ((T F) PANEL I'`"fANNO CREEK \_7„.../ Pit E CAP M. O CREEK \ (TYP) CIIANrIEI I I I I `12 3/4" O D. ,! S1EEL PIPE . PILE (1(P) UT 1• (/) (7 0Z "0 a: ,l -1 0 < •• LOOKING NORTH • m -II yc m 0 Ill r' -1 z ;11 0 -0 (,+ 3 0 "<-1 (61 -'1 �O 0 10 20 �+ no - o IT -� 1 0 0 •• L 0 Scale in feel 1 Z Z �m 1; CI,)n � � 000 CU � Srmnl Y (7z - Nrn0 .1 A g ��I 91 Off) o GI 71 Z �j _.1 0 \ 0 to Y In 7i) 0 ) 0 C -1 Z :0 C C) "0 : O f-0 n U) Z Pl• ' C) < W 0 :0 O ,O C) Z I') r') Z 0 C) 0 VARIES FROM 0" EAST END OF BRIDGE '1 60'-2" 10 5 1/2" WEST END OF BRIDGE _ PI X .--6" 6.-7" 44'-O" ROADWAY 6'-7" 1'-6' rlEW STEEL NEW C P CONC. q WIDENED „,j- REMOVE EXIST. ASPHALT ..� Z RAILING 5IOEWAIK BRIDGE & w / WEARING SURFACE. REPLACE iv 0 I HEW 1'-3" THICK PROFILE PROPOSED -, NEW UTILITY PRECAST CONCftEIE GRADE --� k w/ NEW ASPHALT MAKING C jilt I:INIDIUl DECK PANEL (TYP) ExIST @IG kOADWAI SURFACE OVER ENTIRE WIDTN ^--- -+ (f YP) EXIS UNG POST BILIUGE YAGENEU AOAUwA Y _I • RAILIIIG, CURB p _ EXISTING POST I 1— -- �� A110 SIDEWALK 9 _ Ii l'-9 RAILING AIrD CURE b+ --[ _ :'I_ 13_ 10 DE REMOVED + TO BE REMOVED — 1 _ C1 +.Q__ - --- f+.,. _t7 , — TL_ .. t • • • • Cr) k6.1 LI hi ►-� (� O �I - - T- -r-i - - �-- - -T T - -� - - - Tr V (� 1 IA IC I 1 U I EXISTING PILE I I I I 1-(EXISTING DECK I I LXIST11IG CAP TO REMAIN PANELS JO REMAIN NEW I P. COHC HL 12" & "MA I NEW C I.P. �Grlc. I I III II I I I I I PILE CAP (`� BURIED MAINS I I PILE CAP I I I I I I I REMOVE ExIST. I 0 ` 1 DURIED DELOW UTILITY COIIGUITS 1 I Li NEW 12 3/4" O.D. 1 1 I I I I do 11AIIG'ERIS II I I- - / .J U PIPE PILE (i YP) 11 l J l.�f,� L i L1 .�, 1_, `— ` J PIPE T.PILE 3/4 D. *-614_101:0-___I 5'-0" I 3'-6"I 30'-0" 3 PILE SPA = 15'-0" 14 (11 I. (n l7 O T) 6.-_4_l- __WIDENING = 12'-8" EXISTING BRIDGE = 32' 0" -#- wIDENUIG = 15'-6" is II —1 0 < •• :0 - • frl '0 > C 111 0 P1 1- -' Z :U C) 1) L- y 0 ) -+1-o TYPICAL. SECTION - WIDENED BRIDGE 0 •- ri Z o u LOOKING WEST-ri co 0 4 B L, -- ir1D -UC)0p Scule in Feel c) w C) D () z - NmoRI _� x r —< c/ rn 0 c) -i (0 m ,I -II Z "Z ( Z I 0 1:1 ) CA :U 0 MEETING RECORDS AGENDA ITEM 2.1 BEFORE THE LAND USE HEARINGS OFFICER FOR THE CITY OF TIGARD, OREGON Regarding an application by the City of Tigard STAFF REPORT to widen a bridge over Fanno Creek from 30 feet SLR 95-0005 to 60 feet, located on SW Bonita Road. This development is within the 100-year floodplain. I. SUMMARY OF THE REQUEST BONITA BRIDGE WIDENING CASE: Sensitive Lands Review SLR 95-0005 SUMMARY: A request for Sensitive Lands Review to widen an existing bridge over Fanno Creek from 30 feet to 60 feet, located on SW Bonita Road. The bridge is located within the 100-year floodplain. APPLICANTS: City of Tigard OWNER: Same 13125 SW Hall Blvd. Tigard, OR 97223 COMPREHENSIVE PLAN DESIGNATION: I-L (Light Industrial) ZONING DESIGNATION: I-L (Light Industrial) LOCATION: SW Bonita Road crossing of Fanno Creek. East of SW 76th Avenue and west of SW 74th Avenue. APPLICABLE LAW: Community Development Code Chapter 18.84. Comprehensive Plan Policies 2.1.1, 3.2.1, 3.2.2, 3.5.4, 4.2.1 STAFF RECOMMENDATION: Approval. II. SITE AND VICINITY INFORMATION A. Background Information: No other development applications have been filed with the City of Tigard. B. Site Information and Proposal Description: The area of the proposed work is east of the intersection of SW Bonita Road and SW 76th Avenue and west of the intersection of SW Bonita Road and SW 74th Avenue. The proposed work is on both sides of the bridge within the SW Bonita Road right-of- way. The area to be effected is covered with blackberry bushes. No structures are located in the area with exception of the existing bridge and roadway. The existing bridge does not meet current standards for lane and shoulder width and does not have adequate pedestrian sidewalks, with one sidewalk on the south side of the bridge. The applicant proposes to widen the existing 30 foot wide bridge to a width of 60 feet. The widening will be accomplished by removing the existing railings, curbs, sidewalk, and asphalt roadway and extending the existing structure to the north aproximately 16 feet and to the south approximately 13 feet. Three new steel pipe piles will be added at each end of each existing pile bent, and three new steel pipe piles will be added at each end of each existing abutment. The new steel pipe piles will be the same outside diameter as the piles under the existing structure. The proposal requires a sensitive lands permit as the pilings will be located within the 100-year floodplain of Fanno Creek. C. Vicinity Information: The adjacent properties to the northeast and southeast are zoned I-L (Light Industrial), property to the northwest and southwest are zoned R-12 (Residential, 12 units per acre). The surrounding area is developed with a mix of residential and industrial uses. III. APPLICABLE APPROVAL STANDARDS AND REQUEST EVALUATION A. COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT CODE: Chapter 18.84 contains regulations for lands within 100-year floodplains that are subject to Sensitive Lands Review. Sensitive Lands Review of proposed developments in these areas is intended to implement floodplain protection measures and to protect rivers,streams and creeks by minimizing erosion,promoting bank stability,maintaining and enhancing water quality and fish and wildlife habitat, and preserving scenic quality HEARINGS OFFICER - SLR 95-0005 - BONITA BRIDGE / CITY OF TIGARD Page2 and recreational potential. Section 18.84.015(E) requires Hearings Officer approval for a Sensitive Lands Permit within the 100-year floodplain. Chapter 18.84.040(A) states that the appropriate approval authority shall approve or approve with conditions an application request within the 100-year floodplain in subsections 18.84.015(B) and (E) based upon findings that all of the following criteria have been satisfied: 1. Land form alterations shall preserve or enhance the floodplain storage function and maintenance of the zero-foot rise floodway shall not result in any encroachments, including fill, new construction, substantial improvements, and other development unless certified by a registered professional engineer that the encroachment will not result in any increase in flood levels during the base flood discharge. The applicant's hydraulic analysis concluded that water surface elevations for existing and proposed bridge conditions indicate no change in the 100-year floodplain due to proposed changes in the bridge. 2. Land form alterations or developments within the 100-year floodplain shall be allowed only in areas designated as commercial or industrial on the comprehensive plan land use map, except that alterations or developments associated with community recreation uses, utilities, or public support facilities as defined in Chapter 18.42 of the Community Development Code shall be allowed in areas designated residential subject to applicable zoning standards. The Comprehensive Plan designation for this parcel is I-L (Light Industrial). 3. Where a land form alteration or development is permitted to occur within the floodplain it will not result in any increase in the water surface elevation of the 100-year flood. The applicant's hydraulic analysis concluded that water surface elevations for existing and proposed bridge conditions indicate no change in the 100-year floodplain due to proposed changes in the bridge. 4. The land form alteration or development plan includes a pedestrian/bicycle pathway in accordance with the adopted pedestrian/bicycle pathway plan, unless the construction of said HEARINGS OFFICER - SLR 95-0005 - BONITA BRIDGE / CITY OF TIGARD Page3 pathway is deemed by the Hearing Officer as untimely. The bridge will incorporate a shoulder suitable for bicycle traffic. SW Bonita Road is not designated as a proposed pedestrian/bicycle path as contained in the Tigard Parks Master Plan. 5. The plans for the pedestrian/bicycle pathway indicate that no pathway will be below the elevation of an average annual flood. This proposal does not contain a plan for a pathway. 6. The necessary U.S. Army Corps of Engineers and State of Oregon Land Board, Division of State Lands approvals shall be obtained. The City has recieved comments from both the Army Corps of Engineers and Division of State Lands and permits were not required by either agency. 7. Where land form alterations and/or development are allowed within and adjacent to the 100-year floodplain, the City shall require the dedication of sufficient open land area within and adjacent to the floodplain in accordance with the comprehensive plan. This proposal is on public right-of-way and does not contain property which could be be dedicated for pathway purposes. Chapter 18.84.040(C) states that the Director shall approve or approve with conditions an application request for a sensitive lands permit within drainageways based upon findings that all of the following criteria has been satisfied: 1. The extent and nature of the proposed land form alteration or development will not create site disturbances to the extent greater than that required for the use. The disturbance is the minimum disturbance necessary to accomodate the bridge widening. The installation of the piling will occur from the bridge and will therefore reduce the extent of site disturbances. 2. The proposed land form alteration or development will not result in erosion, stream sedimentation, ground instability, or other adverse on-site and off-site effects or hazards to life or property. Construction will require an erosion control plan, approved by the Engineering Department, in conformance with Unified Sewerage Agency Resolution and Order 91-47. HEARINGS OFFICER - SLR 95-0005 - BONITA BRIDGE / CITY OF TIGARD Page4 3. The water flow capacity of the drainageway is not decreased. The hydraulic analysis concluded that the capacity of the drainageway, as well as the flooplain will be be decreased or negatively impacted. 4. Where natural vegetation has been removed due to land form alteration or development, the areas not covered by structures or impervious surfaces will be replanted to prevent erosion in accordance with Chapter 18.100, Landscaping and Screening. The minimal amount of vegetation loss expected with construction will be hydroseeded. Erosion control measures shall also be taken during construction. The applicants construction plans shall be reviewed and approved by the Engineering Department. 5. The drainageway will be replaced by a public facility of adequate size to accommodate maximum flow in accordance with the adopted 1981 Master Drainage Plan. This requirement is not applicable as the drainageway will not be impaired by the bridge's construction. 6. The necessary U.S. Army Corps of Engineers and State of Oregon Land Board, Division of State Lands approvals shall be obtained. As discussed in the previous section, permits are not required. 7. Where landform alterations and/or development are allowed within and adjacent to the 100-year floodplain, the City shall require the dedication of sufficient open land area within and adjacent to the floodplain in accordance with the Comprehensive Plan. This area shall include portions of a suitable elevation for the construction of a pedestrian/bicycle pathway within the floodplain in accordance with the adopted pedestrian bicycle pathway plan. As discussed in the previous section, dedication is not required. B. COMPREHENSIVE PLAN POLICIES. 1. Policy 2.1.1 provides the City will assure that citizens will be provided an opportunity to participate in all phases of the planning and development review process. Policy 2.1.1 is satisfied because the applicant held a neighborhood meeting, notice of the application and public hearing on this item was provided to owners of property in the vicinity of the site and in a HEARINGS OFFICER - SLR 95-0005 - BONITA BRIDGE / CITY OF TIGARD PageS newspaper of general circulation. The site has also been posted with a sign which states that a sensitive lands review application is pending for this property. 2. Policy 3.2.1 provides that the City will prohibit any development within the 100-year floodplain that would result in any rise in elevation of the 100-year floodplain. Policy 3.2.1 is satisfied because this proposal will not result in any rise in the elevation of the 100-year flooplain. 3. Policy 3.2.2 provides that the City shall prohibit development in the floodway, except if the alteration preserves or enhances the function and maintenance of the zero-foot rise floodway. Policy 3.2.2 is satisfied because this development will preserve the function and maintenance of the zero-foot rise floodway. 4. Policy 3.5.4 provides that the City provide an interconnected pedestrian/bikepath throughout the City. Policy 3.5.4 is satisfied because this bridge will accommodate a pedestrian/bikeway system. 5. Policy 4.2.1 provides that all development within the Tigard Urban Planning Area shall comply with applicable federal, state and regional water quality standards. Policy 4.2.1 shall be satisified as construction shall comply with erosion control measures for the Tualatin River Basin. IV. AGENCY COMMENTS 1. The City of Tigard Engineering Department has reviewed the proposal and has provided the following comments: The Engineering Department has no objection to approval of the application. The CDC at 18.84.040 A. 1. requires that "land form alterations shall preserve or enhance the floodplain storage function and maintenance of the zero-foot rise floodway shall not result in any narrowing of the floodway boundary". The applicant has submitted construction plans showing that landform alterations are limited to the installation of twelve 12-3/4" diameter steel pipe pilings for the bridge. Installation will be from the bridge, eliminating the need of entry into the floodplain by construction equipment. Alterations at the HEARINGS OFFICER - SLR 95-0005 - BONITA BRIDGE / CITY OF TIGARD Page6 bridge abutments are less than 50 cubic yards and include a retaining wall to ensure slope stability. Accordingly, the zero-foot rise floodway will remain unaltered. Paragraph three of this subsection requires that land form alterations in the floodplain "will not result in any increase in the water surface elevation of the 100-year flood." The applicant has submitted an engineering study "Hydraulic Analysis of Fanno Creek at the Bonita Road Bridge to Assess Hydraulic Impacts of Proposed Bridge Widening, February 20, 1995." This study evaluated the change of the elevation of the 100-year flood in accordance with the City's Drainage Master Plan and concluded that the proposed bridge would not result in any change of the elevation of the 100-year flood. Similarly, the approval criteria of subsection c., drainageways are met: 1) Eliminating the need for equipment entry into the floodplain by installing the piles from the bridge will ensure that site disturbances are of no greater extent than required; 2) This will also ensure that erosion, stream sedimentation, ground instability, or other adverse effects will not result. Construction will require an erosion control plan, approved by the Engineering Department, in conformance with Unified Sewerage Agency Resolution and Order 91-47; 3) As previously mentioned, the submitted study shows that the capacity of the drainageway, as well as the floodplain, is not decreased; 4) Vegetation removal will be limited to blackberries. Any ground left uncovered will be restored with grass. 2. The City of Tigard Public Works Department, Building Division and Police Department have reviewed this proposal and have no objections to this proposal. 3. The U.S. Army Corps of Engineers and Division of State Lands have reviewed this proposal and have no objections to this proposal. 4. The Unified Sewerage Agency states that surface runoff, during and post construction, should be treated before it is allowed to discharge into Fanno Creek. Engineers written cerification should include his statement that the project as designed will cause no change in the water surface elevation during a 100-year storm event. 5. No additional comments have been recieved. VI. CONCLUSION AND RECOMMENDATION HEARINGS OFFICER - SLR 95-0005 - BONITA BRIDGE / CITY OF TIGARD Pagel Staff concludes that the proposed impacts to Sensitive Lands Areas comply with the applicable approval criteria for issuance of a Sensitive Lands Permit. Staff recommends the approval of SLR 95-0005. THIS APPROVAL SHALL BE VALID FOR EIGHTEEN MONTHS OF THE EFFECTIVE DATE OF THIS DECISION. Prepared by: 2 5/1/95 William D'Andrea Date Assistant Planner Approved by: 471.0( c.,L .as. ', 5/1/95 Dick Bewersdorff ` Date Senior Planner HEARINGS OFFICER - SLR 95-0005 - BONITA BRIDGE I CITY OF TIGARD Page8 . N\ 41.\\ II t \ _ i� Ii _ (C ,.,o ` \ \II a Y s 14 // b zo so ,` -- _IA _ // i' ,,4 I // �" 1 4„ _ dal irl - 7 -11)1-' ' 0 1 _ I ICI t �il 7 -TIN _ Iii IN ) gt ` �W 4 U U O C ,1 Hi aft! mi o 0 i ,III ' Y b L5 II < / I P lye ^1 i_ .gil 11 II N y\ a / 1 � i I + _ HF - \/ rt (� c N.'I 3 / f ,' Z itl 1 6, IJI \7 g - 1c II � r - 5 Ai ' I 1 . — -- _I— — -ma — I,, y W l I il rte':= tit PI n / r I' (I /--�-Z-� o / d ' I ors '( _ - J II N / I -- 4 ,I ,I VMOV02! .0-,t9 II t .L-,09 I ��' I1� I II \: / . , I l PURPOSE: WIDENING OF EXISTING PROPOSED BRIDGE WIDENING CONCRETE BRIDGE IN: CITY OF TIGARD DATUM: NGVD 1929 ]�, OVER: FANNO CREEK ADJACENT PROPERTY OWNERS: PLAN © RIVER COUNT WASHINGTON STATE OF: OREGON _ APPLICATION BY: CITY OF TIGARD 0 - SHEET 2 OF 4 DATE: 2/17/95 _ _ _ ._ _ . _ _ . ,11 ,L © m L • AREATION COUN YGTON L • COUN 4uAH VICINITY v1 OU - 111111 AREA NA 1 ii .. Cr cre yi I OREGON - I YAMHILL T tj COUNTY /,-- y,� � I MARION CLACKMAS COUNTY 1 COUNTY (n t i ■ i O d 1 1 0 0 01 3 5 mrSimi PROJECT > ° < ` SITE Q , z U LOCATION MAP o z Q S n Q U 00 _,, > 0 0 r . ,o ?�� U I G N % 0P SW BONITA RD Q. �i'' GO x 0 > � CC Q I n U > 0 I i-- Q N a) cn z N Cr) z r cn 11 U r PURPOSE: WIDENING OF EXISTING PROPOSED BRIDGE WIDENING CONCRETE BRIDGE IN: CITY OF TIGARD DATUM: NGVD 1929 OVER: FANNO CREEK ADJACENT PROPERTY OWNERS: VICINITY COUNT© RIVER MI 2.69 STATE OF: OREGON S _ APPLICATION BY: CITY OF TIGARD MAP 0 - SHEET 1 OF 4 DATE: 2/17/95 FILE A CITY OF TIGARD OREGON AGENDA CITY OF TIGARD HEARINGS OFFICER TIGARD HHARINGS OFFICER MAY 8, 1995 - 7:00 P.M. CITY OF TIGARD-TOWN HALL 13125 SW HALL BOULEVARD PUBLIC NOTICE: Anyone wishing to speak on an agenda item should sign on the appropriate sign-up sheet(s). Assistive Listening Devices are available for persons with impaired hearing and should be scheduled for Planning Commission meetings by noon on the Monday prior to the meeting. Please call (503) 639-4171, Ext. 320 (voice) or (503) 684-2772 (TDD - Telecommunications Devices for the Deaf). Upon request, the City will also endeavor to arrange for the following services: • Qualified sign language interpreters for persons with speech or hearing impairments; and • Qualified bilingual interpreters. Since these services must be scheduled with outside service providers, it is important to allow as much lead time as possible. Please notify the City of your need by 5:00 p.m. on the Wednesday preceding the meeting date at the same phone numbers as listed above. (OVER FOR MEETING AGENDA ITEM(S) TIGARD HEARINGS OFFICER- 5%8/95 PAGE 1 OF 2 h:\I ogm\patty\hoagend 5.6 CITY OF TIGARD HEARINGS OFFICER MAY 8, 1995 - 7:00 P.M. AGENDA 1 . CALL TO ORDER 2. PUBLIC HEARING 2.1 SENSITIVE LANDS REVIEW (SLR) 95-0005 BONITA BRIDGE WIDENING. A request for Sensitive Lands Review approval to allow the widening of a bridge over Fanno Creek from 30 feet to 60 feet, located on SW Bonita Road. APPLICABLE REVIEW CRITERIA: Community Development Code Sections 18.84. ZONE: I-L (Light Industrial). The Light Industrial zoning allows public support facilities, building maintenance services, manufacturing of finished products, packaging and processing, wholesale, storage, and distribution, among other uses. LOCATION: SW Bonita Road crossing of Fanno Creek. 3. OTHER BUSINESS 4. ADJOURNMENT TIGARD HEARINGS OFFICER-5/8/95 PAGE 2 OF 2 h:\logm\party\h oagend5.8 REQUEST FOR COMMENTS • SIP REQUEST FOR COMMENTS CITY OF TIGARD * OREGON TO: 1‘,4'.. fi'1' I z- DATE: April 18, 1995 FROM: Tigard Planning Department STAFF CONTACT: Will D'Andrea (x315) Phone: (503) 639-4171 Fax: (503) 684-7297 RE: SENSITIVE LANDS REVIEW (SLR) 95-0005 BONITA BRIDGE WIDENING. A request for Sensitive Lands Review approval to allow the widening of a bridge over Fanno Creek from 30 feet to 60 feet, located on SW Bonita Road. LOCATION: SW Bonita Road crossing of Fanno Creek. APPLICABLE REVIEW CRITERIA: Community Development Code Sections 18.84. ZONE: I-L (Light Industrial). The Light Industrial zoning allows public support facilities, building maintenance services, manufacturing of finished products, packaging and processing, wholesale, storage, and distribution, among other uses. Attached is the Site Plan and applicant's statement for your review. From information supplied by various departments and agencies and from other information available to our staff, a report and recommendation will be prepared and a decision will be rendered on the proposal in the near future. If you wish to comment on this application, WE NEED YOUR COMMENTS BACK BY: Friday- April 28, 1995. You may use the space provided below or attach a separate letter to return your comments. If you are unable to respond by the above date, please phone the staff contact noted above with your comments and confirm your comments in writing as soon as possible. If you have any questions, contact the Tigard Planning Department, 13125 SW Hall Boulevard, Tigard, OR 97223. PLEASE CHECK THE FOLLOWING ITEMS THAT APPLY: We have reviewed the proposal and have no objections to it. Please contact of our office. Please refer to the enclosed letter. Written comments provided below: (Please provide the following information) CIA/1/2/ Name of Person Commenting: Phone Number: 311 SLR 95-0005 BONITA BRIDGE WIDENING April 18,1995 • REQUEST FOR COMMENTS CITY OF TIGARO OREGON TO: n/ l DATE: April 18, 1995 /1 /71 Gn-4- FROM: Tigar. • c. g Department STAFF CONTACT: Will D'Andrea (x315) Phone: (503) 639-4171 Fax: (503) 684-7297 RE: SENSITIVE LANDS REVIEW (SLR) 95-0005 BONITA BRIDGE WIDENING. A request for Sensitive Lands Review approval to allow the widening of a bridge over Fanno Creek from 30 feet to 60 feet, located on SW Bonita Road. LOCATION: SW Bonita Road crossing of Fanno Creek. APPLICABLE REVIEW CRITERIA: Community Development Code Sections 18.84. ZONE: I-L (Light Industrial). The Light Industrial zoning allows public support facilities, building maintenance services, manufacturing of finished products, packaging and processing, wholesale, storage, and distribution, among other uses. Attached is the Site Plan and applicant's statement for your review. From information supplied by various departments and agencies and from other information available to our staff, a report and recommendation will be prepared and a decision will be rendered on the proposal in the near future. If you wish to comment on this application, WE NEED YOUR COMMENTS BACK BY: Friday- April 28, 1995. You may use the space provided below or attach a separate letter to return your comments. If you are unable to respond by the above date, please phone the staff contact noted above with your comments and confirm your comments in writing as soon as possible. If you have any questions, contact the Tigard Planning Department, 13125 SW Hall Boulevard, Tigard, OR 97223. PLEASE CHECK THE FOLLOWING ITEMS THAT APPLY: k,/ We have reviewed the proposal and have no objections to it. Please contact of our office. Please refer to the enclosed letter. Written comments provided below: — (Please provide the following information) !Name of Person Commenting: ,✓ Phone Number: 141 SLR 95-0005 BONITA BRIDGE WIDENING April 18,1995 SIP REQUEST FOR COMMENTS / CITY OF TIGARD OREGON TO: _ .��,_�/... L �� � DATE: April 18, 1995 FROM: Tigar. - .nning Department STAFF CONTACT: Will D'Andrea (x315) Phone: (503) 639-4171 Fax: (503) 684-7297 RE: SENSITIVE LANDS REVIEW (SLR) 95-0005 BONITA BRIDGE WIDENING. A request for Sensitive Lands Review approval to allow the widening of a bridge over Fanno Creek from 30 feet to 60 feet, located on SW Bonita Road. LOCATION: SW Bonita Road crossing of Fanno Creek. APPLICABLE REVIEW CRITERIA: Community Development Code Sections 18.84. ZONE: I-L (Light Industrial). The Light Industrial zoning allows public support facilities, building maintenance services, manufacturing of finished products, packaging and processing, wholesale, storage, and distribution, among other uses. Attached is the Site Plan and applicant's statement for your review. From information supplied by various departments and agencies and from other information available to our staff, a report and recommendation will be prepared and a decision will be rendered on the proposal in the near future. If you wish to comment on this application, WE NEED YOUR COMMENTS BACK BY: Friday - April 28, 1995. You may use the space provided below or attach a separate letter to return your comments. If you are unable to respond by the above date, please phone the staff contact noted above with your comments and confirm your comments in writing as soon as possible. If you have any questions, contact the Tigard Planning Department, 13125 SW Hall Boulevard, Tigard, OR 97223. PLEASE CHECK THE FOLLOWING ITEMS THAT APPLY: We have reviewed the proposal and have no objections to it. Please contact of our office. _ Please refer to the enclosed letter. Written comments provided below: (Please provide the following information) Name of Person Commentin:' A A . G - ' J ... � Phone Number: SLR 95-0005 BONITA BRIDGE WIDENING April 18, 1995 REQUEST FOR COMMENTS / CITY OF TIGARD • / OREGON TO: , ri d .:...... f /dA.- DATE: April 18, 1995 FROM: Tigard Planning Department STAFF CONTACT: Will D'Andrea (x315) Phone: (503) 639-4171 fax: (503) 684-7297 RE: SE■ ITIVE LANDS REVI W SLR 95-0005 B•NITA BRIDGE WIDENING. A request for Sensitive Lands Review approval to allow the widening of a bridge over Fanno Creek from 30 feet to 60 feet, located on SW Bonita Road. LOCATION: SW Bonita Road crossing of Fanno Creek. APPLICABLE REVIEW CRITERIA: Community Development Code Sections 18.84. ZONE: 1-L (Light Industrial). The Light Industrial zoning allows public support facilities, building maintenance services, manufacturing of finished products, packaging and processing, wholesale, storage, and distribution, among other uses. Attached is the Site Plan and applicant's statement for your review. From information supplied by various departments and agencies and from other information available to our staff, a report and recommendation will be prepared and a decision will be rendered on the proposal in the near future. If you wish to comment on this application, WE NEED YOUR COMMENTS BACK BY: Friday- April 28, 1995. You may use the space provided below or attach a separate letter to return your comments. If yQu are unable to respond by the above date, please phone the staff contact noted above with your comments and confirm your comments in writing as soon as possible. If you have any questions, contact the Tigard Planning Department, 13125 SW Hall Boulevard, Tigard, OR 97223. PLEASE CHECK THE FOLLOWING ITEMS THAT APPLY: _ We have reviewed the proposal and have no objections to it. Please contact of our office. Please refer to the enclosed letter. Written comments provided below: Sur act Qtcvl ) r � Ar PO s�ConSf rrC�y/o r N o t ( J £ -/tAirnaih- CP-At4dUrCak---Erb^ (/v‘ I JC.ILVY tit . c r -v��)11-'1..-L` (Please provide the following Information) Name of Person Commenting: i1 - L . w v1iL /� Phone Number: 43 Z34 SLR 95.0035 BONRA BRIDGE WIDENING April 18,1995 • MEMORANDUM CITY OF TIGARD TO: Will D'Andrea April 27, 1995 FROM: Greg Berry SUBJECT : Bonita Bridge Widening SLR 95-0005 Findings The CDC at 18 . 84 . 040 A. 1 . requires that "land form alterations shall preserve or enhance the floodplain storage function and maintenance of the zero-foot rise floodway shall not result in any narrowing of the floodway boundary" . The applicant has submitted construction plans showing that landform alterations are limited to the installation of twelve 12-3/4" diameter steel pipe pilings for the bridge . Installation will be from the bridge, eliminating the need of entry into the floodplain by construction equipment . Alterations at the bridge abutments are less than 50 cubic yards and include a retaining wall to ensure slope stability. Accordingly, the zero-foot rise floodway will remain unaltered. Paragraph three of this subsection requires that land form alterations in the floodplain "will not result in any increase in the water surface elevation of the 100-year flood. " The applicant has submitted an engineering study "Hydraulic Analysis of Fanno Creek at the Bonita Road Bridge to Assess Hydraulic Impacts of Proposed Bridge Widening, February 20, 1995 . " This study evaluated the change of the elevation of the 100-year flood in accordance with the City' s Drainage Master Plan and concluded that the proposed bridge would not result in any change of the elevation of the 100-year flood. Similarly, the approval criteria of subsection c. , drainageways are met . 1 . Eliminating the need for equipment entry into the floodplain by installing the piles from the bridge will ensure that site disturbances are of no greater extent than required. 2 . This will also ensure that erosion, stream sedimentation, ground instability, or other adverse effects will not result . Construction will require an erosion control plan, approved by the Engineering Department, in conformance with Unified Sewerage Agency Resolution and Order 91-47 . 3 . As previously mentioned, the submitted study shows that the capacity of the drainageway, as well as the floodplain, is not decreased. 4 . Vegetation removal will be limited to blackberries . Any ground left uncovered will be restored with grass . Recommendation : The Engineering Department has no objection to approval of the application . APPROVED : Randall R. Woole City Engineer dj/ENGINEER:SLR95-05.GNB PLANNING REQUEST FOR COMMENTS i MAY 011995 CITY- OREGONARD TO: a Z a.. i ,%��_. ��1� DATE: April 18, 1995 FROM: Tigard Planning Department STAFF CONTACT: Will D'Andrea (x315) Phone: (503) 639-4171 Fax: (503) 684-7297 RE: SENSITIVE LANDS REVIEW (SLR) 95-0005 BONITA BRIDGE WIDENING. A request for Sensitive Lands Review approval to allow the widening of a bridge over Fanno Creek from 30 feet to 60 feet, located on SW Bonita Road. LOCATION: SW Bonita Road crossing of Fanno Creek. APPLICABLE REVIEW CRITERIA: Community Development Code Sections 18.84. ZONE: I-L (Light Industrial). The Light Industrial zoning allows public support facilities, building maintenance services, manufacturing of finished products, packaging and processing, wholesale, storage, and distribution, among other uses. Attached is the Site Plan and applicant's statement for your review. From information supplied by various departments and agencies and from other information available to our staff, a report and recommendation will be prepared and a decision will be rendered on the proposal in the near future. If you wish to comment on this application, WE NEED YOUR COMMENTS BACK BY: Friday- April 28, 1995. You may use the space provided below or attach a separate letter to return your comments. If you are unable to respond by the above date, please phone the staff contact noted above with your comments and confirm your comments in writing as soon as possible. If you have any questions, contact the Tigard Planning Department, 13125 SW Hall Boulevard, Tigard, OR 97223. PLEASE CHECK THE FOLLOWING ITEMS THAT APPLY: We have reviewed the proposal and have no objections to it. _ Please contact of our office. _ Please refer to the enclosed letter. Written comments provided below: I. n Our I no _ay) f 0 s-t C.0)9 S'1r1t c.11 d h ) 0 to(d riLurnt Lid (>4_f 4 a,C;Q.owNt uf to ci.cA c I4va t. . kA-N. 'aAvyi.o 'FA LC1(Jr>zu.4 w n Q,b.. C S.. LA; ( ciutAc ' •:r -•. - ∎ .L 4611.4 ■ _x. L. .; V.1 v1.9 CAAA ..c /a w4 f t,. S.tAvtis ,c. ,t,;(9--s— fi e )0 v i -QA1 (Please provide the following information) l,, , ,, Name of Person Commenting: 141 . L- )oti� 'v Phone Number: cA 4 3 Z-34- SLR 95-0005 BONITA BRIDGE WIDENING April 18,1995 MAILING RECORDS ' 44 CITY OF TIGARD OREGON AFFIDAVIT OF MAILING STATE OF OREGON ) County of Washington ) ss. City of Tigard ) I, Patricia L. Lunsford, being first duly sworn/affirm, on oath depose and say: That I am a Senior Office Assistant for The City of Tigard, Oregon. X That I served NOTICE OF PUBLIC HEARING FOR: That I served NOTICE OF DECISION FOR: City of Tigard Planning Director Tigard Planning Commission X Tigard Hearings Officer Tigard City Council A copy of the PUBLIC HEARING NOTICE/NOTICE OF DECISION/NOTICE OF FINAL ORDER of which is attached, marked Exhibit "A", was mailed to each named person(s) at the address(s) shown on the attached list(s), marked Exhibit "B", on the 18th day of April, 1995 and deposited in the United States Mail on the 18th day of April, 1995, postage prepaid. - A .4 lid. 1 t ',Pared Notices / Subscribed and sworn/affirmed before me on the /472 day l of/// , 19/s.--- ,,, r `,: ( FILIAL SEAL-4: •` ill', /�r`�I�_ ,-1, NOTARY PUSLIC-OREGON COMMISSION NO.008977 ' NOTARY PUB �I OF ORE N / In COMMISSION EXPIRES . PT.7,x998 -_- My Commissio xpires: 7 S FILE INFO.: (SLR 95-0005 (NOTICE OF 5/8/95 PUBLIC HEARING FOR THE H.O.) BONITA BRIDGE WIDENING "Exhibit A" • PUBLIC HEARING NOTICE NOTICE IS HEREBY GIVEN THAT THE TIGARD HEARINGS OFFICER, � AT A MEETING ON MONDAY, MAY 8. 1995 AT 7:00 PM, -1411 IN THE TOWN HALL OF THE TIGARD CIVIC CENTER, CITY OF TIGARD 13125 SW HALL BOULEVARD, TIGARD, OREGON 97223 WILL CONSIDER THE FOLLOWING APPLICATION: FILE NO: SENSITIVE LANDS REVIEW (SLR) 95-0005 FILE TITLE: BONITA BRIDGE WIDENING APPLICANT: CITY OF TIGARD OWNER: Same 13125 SW Hall Boulevard Tigard, OR 97223 REQUEST: A request for Sensitive Lands Review approval to allow the widening of a bridge over Fanno Creek from 30 feet to 60 feet, located on SW Bonita Road. LOCATION: SW Bonita Road crossing of Fanno Creek. APPLICABLE REVIEW Community Development Code Sections 18.84. CRITERIA: ZONE: I-L (Light Industrial). The Light Industrial zoning allows public support facilities, building maintenance services, manufacturing of finished products, packaging and processing, wholesale, storage, and distribution, among other uses. THE PUBLIC HEARING ON THIS MATTER WILL BE CONDUCTED IN ACCORDANCE WITH THE RULES OF CHAPTER 18.32 OF THE COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT CODE AND RULES OF PROCEDURE ADOPTED BY THE TIGARD CITY COUNCIL AND AVAILABLE AT CITY HALL, OR RULES OF PROCEDURE SET FORTH IN CHAPTER 18.30. ASSISTIVE LISTENING DEVICES ARE AVAILABLE FOR PERSONS WITH IMPAIRED HEARING. THE CITY WILL ALSO ENDEAVOR TO ARRANGE FOR QUALIFIED SIGN LANGUAGE INTERPRETERS AND QUALIFIED BILINGUAL INTERPRETERS UPON REQUEST. PLEASE CALL 639-4171, EXT. 320 (VOICE) OR 684-2772 (TDD- TELECOMMUNICATIONS DEVICES FOR THE DEAF) NO LESS THAN ONE WEEK PRIOR TO THE HEARING TO MAKE ARRANGEMENTS. ANYONE WISHING TO PRESENT WRITTEN TESTIMONY ON THIS PROPOSED ACTION MAY DO SO IN WRITING PRIOR TO OR AT THE PUBLIC HEARING. ORAL TESTIMONY MAY BE PRESENTED AT THE PUBLIC HEARING. AT THE PUBLIC HEARING, THE HEARINGS OFFICER WILL RECEIVE A STAFF REPORT PRESENTATION FROM THE CITY PLANNER; OPEN THE PUBLIC HEARING; AND INVITE BOTH ORAL AND WRITTEN TESTIMONY. THE HEARINGS OFFICER MAY CONTINUE THE PUBLIC HEARING TO ANOTHER MEETING TO OBTAIN SLR 95-0005 BONITA BRIDGE WIDENING April 19, 1995 ADDITIONAL INFORMATION, OR CLOSE THE PUBLIC HEARING AND TAKE ACTION ON THE APPLICATION. IF A PERSON SUBMITS EVIDENCE IN SUPPORT TO THE APPLICATION AFTER APRIL 18, 1995, ANY PARTY IS ENTITLED TO REQUEST A CONTINUANCE OF THE HEARING. IF THERE IS NO CONTINUANCE GRANTED AT THE HEARING, ANY PARTICIPANT IN THE HEARING MAY REQUEST THAT THE RECORD REMAIN OPEN FOR AT LEAST SEVEN DAYS AFTER THE HEARING. INCLUDED IN THIS NOTICE IS A LIST OF APPROVAL CRITERIA APPLICABLE TO THE REQUEST FROM THE TIGARD COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT CODE AND THE TIGARD COMPREHENSIVE PLAN. APPROVAL OR DISAPPROVAL OF THE REQUEST BY THE HEARINGS OFFICER WILL BE BASED UPON THESE CRITERIA AND THESE CRITERIA ONLY. AT THE HEARING IT IS IMPORTANT THAT COMMENTS RELATING TO THE REQUEST PERTAIN SPECIFICALLY TO THE APPLICABLE CRITERIA LISTED. FAILURE TO RAISE AN ISSUE IN PERSON OR BY LETTER AT SOME POINT PRIOR TO THE CLOSE OF THE HEARING ON THE REQUEST OR FAILURE TO PROVIDE SUFFICIENT SPECIFICITY TO AFFORD THE DECISION MAKER AN OPPORTUNITY TO RESPOND TO THE ISSUE PRECLUDES AN APPEAL TO THE LAND USE BOARD OF APPEALS BASED ON THAT ISSUE. ALL DOCUMENTS AND APPLICABLE CRITERIA IN THE ABOVE-NOTED FILE ARE AVAILABLE FOR INSPECTION AT NO COST OR COPIES CAN BE OBTAINED FOR TEN CENTS PER PAGE. AT LEAST SEVEN DAYS PRIOR TO THE HEARING, A COPY OF THE STAFF REPORT WILL BE AVAILABLE FOR INSPECTION AT NO COST, OR A COPY CAN BE OBTAINED FOR TEN CENTS PER PAGE. FOR FURTHER INFORMATION PLEASE CONTACT THE STAFF PLANNER WILL D'ANDREA AT (503) 639-4171, TIGARD CITY HALL, 13125 SW HALL BOULEVARD, TIGARD, OREGON. 1 0 0 0 0 z N PROJECT > ° < SITE ? y LOCATION MAP o , 1 < z 1► V) ..J ''DO j ^ ® U 1• CD 1 m LL r11 , O O� �'P W►S++NOTpN L e,/ COUNh ( i AREA t , I tlir CiPc" .p"P \ AREA 1 1 ` J 1 �� `/I a. J { 0P SW BONITA RD r ^ T I ©I I ^ -J /-D Q ,, s' _ > W I (\ 1 uaRn°N C.ACXu&S J C t T G v COUNTS COUNTY N cn — I n ) 3 O ^ T ) . O z V) 1^ < 3 T NCLs Li. � ,r PURPOSE: WIDENING OF EXISTING PROPOSED BRIDGE WIDENING CONCRETE BRIDGE IN: CITY OF TIGARD DATUM: NGVD 1929 7� r7 OVER: FANNO CREEK ADJACENT PROPERTY OWNERS: V I CI. \TIT Y COUNT 0 RIVER MI 2.69 i— STATE OF: OREGON _ AP APPLICATION BY CITY OF TIGARD 0— SHEET 1 OF 4 DATE: 2/17/95 SLR 95-0005 BONITA BRIDGE WIDENING April 18,1995 Exhibit "B" L COLUMBIA SUNDAY SCHOOL WASHINGTON COUNTY BY JOHN E MOUNT FACILITIES MANAGMENT - ADMIN PO BOX 234 150 NE FIRST AVE ROOM B-7 PORTLAND OR 97219 HILLSBORO OR 97123 • CLARENE & MARY MCGARR CLARENCE CARLSON ET AL % PUGET DIE CASTING CO % PUGET CORP OF WASHINGTON 7440 SW BONITA ROAD 7440 SW BONITA ROAD PORTLAND OR 97224 PORTLAND OR 97224 BONITA HOLDINGS, INC DALE DENSON 4252 MUSQUEAM DRIVE . BY COLLEGE PLACE ASSOC VANCOUVER BC CANADA V6N PO BOX 389 PALO ALTO CA 94302 MARCIENE TERRACE ASSOCIATES MILTON 0 BROWN BY COLLEGE PLACE ASSOC 301 NW MURRAY ROAD PO BOX 389 PORTLAND OR 94302 PALO ALTO CA 94302 DO NOT MAIL CITY OF TIGARD 13125 SW HALL BLVD BONITA.ML TIGARD OR 97223 MID-STATE INDUSTRIAL SERVICE, INC. 9398 SW TIGARD AVENUE TIGARD OR 97223 CITY OF TIGARDL===' AGAR r� 13125 S.W. Hall Blvd. ,� , Tigard, Oregon 97223 �/��o NO SUCH APRI8'95 � . /. "t s1.o13 NUMBER :,;z,fi, ���� �` , Q�� C coo ��y L COLUMBIA SUNDAY SCHOOL BY JOHN E MOUNT PO BOX 234 PORTLAND OR 972 ■ 0)--Z 4.1 ,,,,.4.--- - (3) 1 A. CITY OF TIGARD AFFIDAVIT OF MAILING OREGON STATE OF OREGON ) County of Washington ) ss. City of Tigard ) I, Patricia L. Lunsford, being first duly sworn/affirm, on oath depose and say: That I am a Senior Office Assistant for The City of Tigard, Oregon. That I served NOTICE OF PUBLIC HEARING FOR: X That I served NOTICE OF DECISION FOR: City of Tigard Planning Director Tigard Planning Commission X Tigard Hearings Officer Tigard City Council A copy of the PUBLIC HEARING NOTICE/NOTICE OF DECISION/NOTICE OF FINAL ORDER of which is attached, marked Exhibit "A", was mailed to each named person(s) at the address(s) shown on the attached list(s), marked Exhibit "B", on the 16th day of May, 1995; said NOTICE OF PUBLIC HEARING/NOTICE OF DECISION/NOTICE OF FINAL ORDER as hereto attached, was posted on an appropriate bulletin board on the 16th day of May, 1995 and deposited in the United States Mail on the 16th day of May, 1995, postage prepaid. /pr._ r:� � �� 'repared Notice Subscribed and sworn/affirmed before me on the Ii-f ' day of ,!,A.! 19 OFFICIAL SEAL ff ': 1 DIANE AtIJELDERXS f() alAtt■ yktf` s. ,, NOTARY ru 9 L/C-OREGON ; NOTARY PUBLIC O REGO qtr; COMM,.>SION NO.°Geri +; /' M'rCOYYIs OMEXn1RES PT.�,i:• My Commission Exp es: � 7 95 FILE INFO.: (NOTICE OF FINAL ORDER BY THE HEARING'S OFFICER SLR 95-0005 BONITA BRIDGE WIDENING CITY OF TIGARD Washington County, Oregon EXHIBIT A A NOTICE OF FINAL ORDER BY CITY OF TIGARD BY THE HEARINGS OFFICER OREGON Concerning Case Number(s): SENSITIVE LANDS REVIEW (SLR) 95-0005 Name of Owner: City of Tigard Name of Applicant: Same Address of Applicant: 13125 SW Hall Boulevard City: Tigard State: Oregon Zip: 97223 Address of Property: SW Bonita Road crossing of Fanno Creek City: Tigard State: Oregon Zip: 97223 Request ► A request for Sensitive Lands Review approval to allow the widening of a bridge over Fanno Creek from 30 feet to 60 feet, located on SW Bonita Road. LOCATION: SW Bonita Road crossing of Fanno Creek. APPLICABLE REVIEW CRITERIA: Community Development Code Sections 18.84. Zone: I-L (Light Industrial). The Light Industrial zoning allows public support facilities, building maintenance services, manufacturing of finished products, packaging and processing, wholesale, storage, and distribution, among other uses. Action ► ® Approval as requested LJ Approval with conditions ❑ Denial Notice: Notice was published in the newspaper, posted at City Hall and mailed to: ® Owners of record within the required distance ® Affected governmental agencies CO The affected Citizen Involvement Team Facilitator ® The applicant and ownerls) THE DECISION SHALL BE FINAL ON MAY 31, 1995 UNLESS AN APPEAL IS FILED Final Decision The adopted findings of fact, decision and statement of conditions can be obtained from the City of Tigard Planning Department, Tigard City Hall, 13125 SW Hall Boulevard, Tigard, Oregon 97223. Appeal: Any party to the decision may appeal this decision in accordance with 18.32.290 (B) and Section 18.32.370, which provides that a written appeal may be filed within ten 110) days after notice is given and sent. The appeal may be submitted on City forms and must be accompanied by the appeal fee(s) of $315.00 plus transcript costs, not in excess of $500.00. THE DEADLINE FOR FILING OF AN APPEAL IS 3:30 P.M. ON MAY 31, 1995 Questions: If you have any questions, please call the City of Tigard Planning Department at (503) 639-4171. NOTICE OF FINAL ORDER BY THE HEARING'S OFFICER SLR 95-0005 BONITA BRIDGE WIDENING r BEFORE THE LAND USE HEARINGS OFFICER - FOR THE CITY OF TIGARD,OREGON Regarding an application by the City of Tigard for a ) FINAL ORDER sensitive lands review to alter land in a 100-year floodplain ) to widen the Bonita Road brige over Fanno Creek ) SLR 95-0005 in the City of Tigard, Oregon ) (Bonita Road Bridge) I. FINDINGS ABOUT SITE, SURROUNDINGS AND PUBLIC FACILITIES The hearings officer incorporates by reference the findings about the site and surroundings in Sections I and II of the City of Tigard Staff Reported dated May 1, 1995 (the "Staff Report") and the agency comments in Section IV of the Staff Report. H. APPLICABLE APPROVAL STANDARDS AND RESPONSIVE FINDINGS The hearings officer incorporates by reference the approval standards and the findings in response to them in Section III of the Staff Report. III. HEARING AND RECORD 1. Hearings Officer Larry Epstein received testimony at the public hearing about this application on May 8, 1995. A record of that testimony is included herein as Exhibit A (Parties of Record), Exhibit B (Taped Proceedings), and Exhibit C (Written Testimony). These exhibits are filed at the Tigard City Hall. 2. City planner Will D'Andrea and City engineer Michael Anderson summarized the Staff Report. No one else appeared in person or in writing. IV. SITE VISIT BY HEARINGS OFFICER The hearings officer visited the site and surrounding area. He observed the existing access to and structures, vegetation, and grades on the site and adjoining property and the condition of the adjoining streets. V. CONCLUSION AND DECISION 1. The hearings officer concludes that the proposed Sensitive Lands Review complies with the applicable criteria and standards of the Community Development Code, provided development that occurs after this decision complies with applicable local, state, and federal laws. 2. In recognition of the findings and conclusions contained herein, and incorporating the Staff Report and other reports of effect agencies and public testimony and exhibits received in this matter, the Hearings Officer hereby approves SLR 95-0005. 6 • D i s I 1 th day of ., , 995. ■111/0" .4 /— I: Larry Epstein, • ' / City of Tigar► - . 'nt 'S ficer AGENDA ITEM 2.1 BEFORE THE LAND USE HEARINGS OFFICER FOR THE CITY OF TIGARD, OREGON Regarding an application by the City of Tigard STAFF REPORT to widen a bridge over Fanno Creek from 30 feet SLR 95-0005 to 60 feet, located on SW Bonita Road. This development is within the 100-year floodplain. I. SUMMARY OF THE REQUEST BONITA BRIDGE WIDENING CASE: Sensitive Lands Review SLR 95-0005 SUMMARY: A request for Sensitive Lands Review to widen an existing bridge over Fanno Creek from 30 feet to 60 feet, located on SW Bonita Road. The bridge is located within the 100-year floodplain. APPLICANTS: City of Tigard OWNER: Same 13125 SW Hall Blvd. Tigard, OR 97223 COMPREHENSIVE PLAN DESIGNATION: I-L (Light Industrial) ZONING DESIGNATION: I-L (Light Industrial) LOCATION: SW Bonita Road crossing of Fanno Creek. East of SW 76th Avenue and west of SW 74th Avenue. APPLICABLE LAW: Community Development Code Chapter 18.84. Comprehensive Plan Policies 2.1.1, 3.2.1, 3.2.2, 3.5.4, 4.2.1 STAFF RECOMMENDATION: Approval. II. SITE AND VICINITY INFORMATION A. Background Information: No other development applications have been filed with the City of Tigard. B. Site Information and Proposal Description: The area of the proposed work is east of the intersection of SW Bonita Road and SW 76th Avenue and west of the intersection of SW Bonita Road and SW 74th Avenue. The proposed work is on both sides of the bridge within the SW Bonita Road right-of- way. The area to be effected is covered with blackberry bushes. No structures are located in the area with exception of the existing bridge and roadway. The existing bridge does not meet current standards for lane and shoulder width and does not have adequate pedestrian sidewalks, with one sidewalk on the south side of the bridge. The applicant proposes to widen the existing 30 foot wide bridge to a width of 60 feet. The widening will be accomplished by removing the existing railings, curbs, sidewalk, and asphalt roadway and extending the existing structure to the north aproximately 16 feet and to the south approximately 13 feet. Three new steel pipe piles will be added at each end of each existing pile bent, and three new steel pipe piles will be added at each end of each existing abutment. The new steel pipe piles will be the same outside diameter as the piles under the existing structure. The proposal requires a sensitive lands permit as the pilings will be located within the 100-year floodplain of Fanno Creek. C. Vicinity Information: The adjacent properties to the northeast and southeast are zoned I-L (Light Industrial), property to the northwest and southwest are zoned R-12 (Residential, 12 units per acre). The surrounding area is developed with a mix of residential and industrial uses. III. APPLICABLE APPROVAL STANDARDS AND REQUEST EVALUATION A. COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT CODE: Chapter 18.84 contains regulations for lands within 100-year floodplains that are subject to Sensitive Lands Review. Sensitive Lands Review of proposed developments in these areas is intended to implement floodplain protection measures and to protect rivers,streams and creeks by minimizing erosion,promoting bank stability,maintaining and enhancing water quality and fish and wildlife habitat, and preserving scenic quality HEARINGS OFFICER - SLR 95-0005 - BONITA BRIDGE / CITY OF TIGARD Paget and recreational potential. Section 18.84.015(E) requires Hearings Officer approval for a Sensitive Lands Permit within the 100-year floodplain. • Chapter 18.84.040(A) states that the appropriate approval authority shall approve or approve with conditions an application request within the 100-year floodplain in subsections 18.84.015(B) and (E) based upon findings that all of the following criteria have been satisfied: 1. Land form alterations shall preserve or enhance the floodplain storage function and maintenance of the zero-foot rise floodway shall not result in any encroachments, including fill, new construction, substantial improvements, and other development unless certified by a registered professional engineer that the encroachment will not result in any increase in flood levels during the base flood discharge. The applicant's hydraulic analysis concluded that water surface elevations for existing and proposed bridge conditions indicate no change in the 100-year floodplain due to proposed changes in the bridge. 2. Land form alterations or developments within the 100-year floodplain shall be allowed only in areas designated as commercial or industrial on the comprehensive plan land use map, except that alterations or developments associated with community recreation uses, utilities, or public support facilities as defined in Chapter 18.42 of the Community Development Code shall be allowed in areas designated residential subject to applicable zoning standards. The Comprehensive Plan designation for this parcel is I-L (Light Industrial). 3. Where a land form alteration or development is permitted to occur within the floodplain it will not result in any increase in the water surface elevation of the 100-year flood. The applicant's hydraulic analysis concluded that water surface elevations for existing and proposed bridge conditions indicate no change in the 100-year floodplain due to proposed changes in the bridge. 4. The land form alteration or development plan includes a pedestrian/bicycle pathway in accordance with the adopted pedestrian/bicycle pathway plan, unless the construction of said HEARINGS OFFICER - SLR 95-0005 - BONITA BRIDGE / CITY OF TIGARD Page3 pathway is deemed by the Hearing Officer as untimely. The bridge will incorporate a shoulder suitable for bicycle traffic. SW Bonita Road - is not designated as a proposed pedestrian/bicycle path as contained in the Tigard Parks Master Plan. 5. The plans for the pedestrian/bicycle pathway indicate that no pathway will be below the elevation of an average annual flood. This proposal does not contain a plan for a pathway. 6. The necessary U.S. Army Corps of Engineers and State of Oregon Land Board, Division of State Lands approvals shall be obtained. The City has recieved comments from both the Army Corps of Engineers and Division of State Lands and permits were not required by either agency. 7. Where land form alterations and/or development are allowed within and adjacent to the 100-year floodplain, the City shall require the dedication of sufficient open land area within and adjacent to the floodplain in accordance with the comprehensive plan. This proposal is on public right-of-way and does not contain property which could be be dedicated for pathway purposes. Chapter 18.84.040(C) states that the Director shall approve or approve with conditions an application request for a sensitive lands permit within drainageways based upon findings that all of the following criteria has been satisfied: 1. The extent and nature of the proposed land form alteration or development will not create site disturbances to the extent greater than that required for the use. The disturbance is the minimum disturbance necessary to accomodate the bridge widening. The installation of the piling will occur from the bridge and will therefore reduce the extent of site disturbances. 2. The proposed land form alteration or development will not result in erosion, stream sedimentation, ground instability, or other adverse on-site and off-site effects or hazards to life or property. Construction will require an erosion control plan, approved by the Engineering Department, in conformance with Unified Sewerage Agency Resolution and Order 91-47. HEARINGS OFFICER - SLR 95-0005 - BONITA BRIDGE / CITY OF TIGARD Page4 3. The water flow capacity of the drainageway is not decreased. The hydraulic analysis concluded that the capacity of the drainageway, as well as the flooplain will be be decreased or negatively impacted. 4. Where natural vegetation has been removed due to land form alteration or development, the areas not covered by structures or impervious surfaces will be replanted to prevent erosion in accordance with Chapter 18.100, Landscaping and Screening. The minimal amount of vegetation loss expected with construction will be hydroseeded. Erosion control measures shall also be taken during construction. The applicants construction plans shall be reviewed and approved by the Engineering Department. 5. The drainageway will be replaced by a public facility of adequate size to accommodate maximum flow in accordance with the adopted 1981 Master Drainage Plan. This requirement is not applicable as the drainageway will not be impaired by the bridge's construction. 6. The necessary U.S. Army Corps of Engineers and State of Oregon Land Board, Division of State Lands approvals shall be obtained. As discussed in the previous section, permits are not required. 7. Where landform alterations and/or development are allowed within and adjacent to the 100-year floodplain, the City shall require the dedication of sufficient open land area within and adjacent to the floodplain in accordance with the Comprehensive Plan. This area shall include portions of a suitable elevation for the construction of a pedestrian/bicycle pathway within the floodplain in accordance with the adopted pedestrian bicycle pathway plan. As discussed in the previous section, dedication is not required. B. COMPREHENSIVE PLAN POLICIES. 1. Policy 2.1.1 provides the City will assure that citizens will be provided an opportunity to participate in all phases of the planning and development review process. Policy 2.1.1 is satisfied because the applicant held a neighborhood meeting, notice of the application and public hearing on this item was provided to owners of property in the vicinity of the site and in a HEARINGS OFFICER - SLR 95-0005 - BONITA BRIDGE / CITY OF TIGARD Page5 newspaper of general circulation. The site has also been posted with a sign which states that a sensitive lands review application is pending for this property. 2. Policy 3.2.1 provides that the City will prohibit any development within the 100-year floodplain that would result in any rise in elevation of the 100-year floodplain. Policy 3.2.1 is satisfied because this proposal will not result in any rise in the elevation of the 100-year flooplain. 3. Policy 3.2.2 provides that the City shall prohibit development in the floodway, except if the alteration preserves or enhances the function and maintenance of the zero-foot rise floodway. Policy 3.2.2 is satisfied because this development will preserve the function and maintenance of the zero-foot rise floodway. 4. Policy 3.5.4 provides that the City provide an interconnected pedestrian/bikepath throughout the City. Policy 3.5.4 is satisfied because this bridge will accommodate a pedestrian/bikeway system. 5. Policy 4.2.1 provides that all development within the Tigard Urban Planning Area shall comply with applicable federal, state and regional water quality standards. Policy 4.2.1 shall be satisified as construction shall comply with erosion control measures for the Tualatin River Basin. IV. AGENCY COMMENTS 1. The City of Tigard Engineering Department has reviewed the proposal and has provided the following comments: The Engineering Department has no objection to approval of the application. The CDC at 18.84.040 A. 1. requires that "land form alterations shall preserve or enhance the floodplain storage function and maintenance of the zero-foot rise floodway shall not result in any narrowing of the floodway boundary". The applicant has submitted construction plans showing that landform alterations are limited to the installation of twelve 12-3/4" diameter steel pipe pilings for the bridge. Installation will be from the bridge, eliminating the need of entry into the floodplain by construction equipment. Alterations at the HEARINGS OFFICER - SLR 95-0005 - BONITA BRIDGE / CITY OF TIGARD Page6 bridge abutments are less than 50 cubic yards and include a retaining wall to ensure slope stability. Accordingly, the zero-foot rise floodway will remain unaltered. Paragraph three of this subsection requires that land form alterations • in the floodplain "will not result in any increase in the water surface elevation of the 100-year flood." The applicant has submitted an engineering study "Hydraulic Analysis of Fanno Creek at the Bonita Road Bridge to Assess Hydraulic Impacts of Proposed Bridge Widening, February 20, 1995." This study evaluated the change of the elevation of the 100-year flood in accordance with the City's Drainage Master Plan and concluded that the proposed bridge would not result in any change of the elevation of the 100-year flood. Similarly, the approval criteria of subsection c., drainageways are met: 1) Eliminating the need for equipment entry into the floodplain by installing the piles from the bridge will ensure that site disturbances are of no greater extent than required; 2) This will also ensure that erosion, stream sedimentation, ground instability, or other adverse effects will not result. Construction will require an erosion control plan, approved by the Engineering Department, in conformance with Unified Sewerage Agency Resolution and Order 91-47; 3) As previously mentioned, the submitted study shows that the capacity of the drainageway, as well as the floodplain, is not decreased; 4) Vegetation removal will be limited to blackberries. Any ground left uncovered will be restored with grass. 2. The City of Tigard Public Works Department, Building Division and Police Department have reviewed this proposal and have no objections to this proposal. 3. The U.S. Army Corps of Engineers and Division of State Lands have reviewed this proposal and have no objections to this proposal. 4. The Unified Sewerage Agency states that surface runoff, during and post construction, should be treated before it is allowed to discharge into Fanno Creek. Engineers written cerification should include his statement that the project as designed will cause no change in the water surface elevation during a 100-year storm event. 5. No additional comments have been recieved. VI. CONCLUSION AND RECOMMENDATION HEARINGS OFFICER - SLR 95-0005 - BONITA BRIDGE / CITY OF TIGARD Pagel Staff concludes that the proposed impacts to Sensitive Lands Areas comply with the applicable approval criteria for issuance of a Sensitive Lands Permit. Staff recommends the approval of SLR 95-0005. THIS APPROVAL SHALL BE VALID FOR EIGHTEEN MONTHS OF THE EFFECTIVE DATE OF THIS DECISION. Prepared by: .r: 2 ,0 i 5/1/95 William D'Andrea Date Assistant Planner Approved by: �Ul 6...,h- . kJ.. 5/1/95 Dick Bewersdorff Date Senior Planner HEARINGS OFFICER - SLR 95-0005 - BONITA BRIDGE / CITY OF TIGARD Page8 II � LOCATION E L '� ` ' °` AREA WASHINGTON '� MUL •MAN COUNTY COON VICINITY - '.- - AREA ' 1 ail I. I OREGON , I YAMHILL T COUNTY I /1 y 1 MARION CLACKMAS COUNTY I COUNTY _ �-� ? O O ` ft 0 U \. ) / \ 01 3 5 O i `J~ \\ MILES PROJECT SITE ? 0 LOCATION MAP Z 0 J D 04, 00 o 21 N o F �'�' ,„„%-4 itk 0 C,,pts'�� ,p-A Ilk N ' SAN BONITA RD J i yip EE a > _\ > -.Q.,., ,) i Lv l 1 R. 1= �!"' Q T i ° cn uI = T UI z N. I U Lt- Cn • ,_T PURPOSE: WIDENING OF EXISTING PROPOSED BRIDGE WIDENING I CONCRETE BRIDGE IN: CITY OF TIGARD 1 DATUM: NGVD 1929 f OVER: FANNO CREEK V C I AT I7'1� 0 RIVER MI 2.69 COUNTY OF: WASHINGTON 1 STATE OF: OREGON APPLICATION BY: CITY OF TIGARD i MA P SHE=- , OF 4 DATE: 3/7/95 I OOOD D 0 D C n -0 C) 0 Ur D o C) K 7D o C) 14._1 I Z m ffl ID - --I Z m ••o O O 0 n 1 D < CD N C) — O '0 0 0 r-• _< r o J o m D fD 10 t7 Z o Z ;o E.) m Z Cl:::( z m o --t 'o C) 132 C) 0 .lae P1 O "T1 v I n z T,l 20'-0- \ ISO _ 97•-0" �,� 1 I/. m X `128 TOP Of FIG — \ ` 5 17 N \ �� EL. 127 SIOEWAIK N , / r Z RELOCATE EXIST. \ -(�FI STEEL / X 0 UNI TTY CONDUITS - — — — ` AL (TYP) 1 ' 30' 136 // < --- J / v_. .'r �a�wa1Le I! �ra�sa�w�r0 ,. C.1 P CONC. �j � /I Goo ---- TOP EL. 137 GUARDRNIE6SCURB / / // T lH// Z rn - a- ° .� 1:7,11--t-:- .ii 1 i 1 1 I REMOVE (XIS!. ASPIL C) -1 7 5 I / W/"NEW AASPI qua Z m ! I I11 11 11 I I I I J I MIOENEO OADWA!.6, 0 p o ;rd 11.1� S.W. BONITA ROAD r I II I C y 'o Exist. I I �-I I � I V— I C) ) I EDGE Of ( 1 1 1 6kIOGE1IE0 / I ..< F11 4P`fNi I \ 1 III / / r � � � ,l'1 I II I v I vt = _ _ — _= — � — - - - ; 1- - - - - - - -I- --I o . -�� . = —o- —•. j 4o- I J - �_ , II / - -j J I_ — ' — to D In n o Z � /11 1 N NillidEIMI I 1 I) ,:. _.0 < •• 'OWE r1 fu D Z m C) 0D >•� oaf —■ mss- I�a�aaanl�a�aaaa�IN /it -1 C)ET1 •• --i 0 I ( REMOVED EXIST. \ NEIOCAIE1EKISI. I fi \ GUARORAK, k SIOEWAIK + N T' Ci TI m J SIDEWALK 1 EIfCT. C(AIOUII -7-1 -9Q � Z0o 7 I �3/ O o .. - Z -*1 j6 , c..... -- O - . / C. P. CONC. �' CO :O �c n RAKING t28- C.IP. CONC. ABUTMENT(TYP) P , m D C)D i PILE CAP (TIP) oN � � �m 0 le 0 0 D o Z Z N 0 7: !'T O� m < 0 10 20 W -►1 Z Z Scale in Feel v - 0 IO D in 7L) I 0 0 0 1) ✓ 0C -I Z 0 C n 13 S ;0 O •• mV z r i m G) < 01 r O aTizi a (0 0 z N) P1 Z (0 0 O m X rfl Z 0 03 o°) 0 0 --------- r^1 n n n n n n ri n •- v z i r STEEL MBE r r 1,� SIDEWALK z W Z 4� 2 `� CD V wm RAILING (TYP)m STEEL POST (TYP) Z te) v 1 ,4,0 ca 3'L'-0" _�'a 32'-0" cy a 32'-0" a I1 I 1C l� li 1f� - 0 l •t I� ) !I 135' C I P. COHC. I ABUTMENF I _ I 130 (TIP)-- I PRECAST CONC. • IMI.O11111111111111111111111 C.I.P. CONC.I DECK PANEL ' (TIP)CAP I 1.2.1.CREEK I 0 CHANNEL II II 12 3/4" 0.D. STEEL PIPE . PILE (TIP) r (f) > V) C) 0Z T -moo --oo Ii • o LOOKING NORTH in I- --I Z :o -o w DOS ® `1 (0) 0 10 20 d7TO D O O O • nr) X Z 0".< Scale in Feel 0 ZO GZ Tlw a .. m > n1. 0 o 0 z - N Imrl O _ x . o ow m z (A m z z 1 C) - \ 0 (0 > In 0 ■ 0 0 -o > oc -I Z xi C O 'D M�2 z Fri•• C) < mg om w 0 z N mz to 0 0 VARIES FROM 0" EAST END OF BRIDGE 60'-2" i TO 5 1/2" WEST END OF BRIDGE X I'-6 6'-7" 44'-0•' ROADWAY 6'-7" 16 N-1 ' NEW STEEL NEW C.LP. CONC. Q WIDENED REMOVE EXIST. ASPHALT Z RAILING SIDEWALK BRIDGE & ,o WEARING SURFACE. REPLACE ■o G) 1 NEW 1'-3" THICK PROFILE /.- PROPOSED i W/ NEW ASPHALT WEARING :� NEW UTILITY PRECAST CONCRETE GRADE ROADWAY n `v I:rklOUl r DECK PANEL (TYP) EXISTING SURFACE OVER ENTIRE WIDTH I -- (rYP) EXISTING POST BRIDGE OF WIDENED ROADWAY. - _ �• I { RAILING, CURB N _ EXISTING POST 7 1 T? AND SIDEWALK J Il I•-5 RAILING AND CURB "mp In _ _ _ I$_ 4t 4..st.TO BE REMOVED 1., + TO BE REMOVED •• — -...-3-1 u t - Li 1 b FI EXISTING PILE I I I I I IEXISTING DECK 1 r r UIING " I CAP I O REMAIN III II I IpANELS TO REMAIN I I NEW CI.P. CC41Ck 24 ( PILE CAP h TER MAINS NEW C.I.P. CONC. REMOVE EXIST. C) BELOW I I PILE CAP I I I I I ( I I 1 I I I I I I I I I &THANGERSOUITS I I as.... NEW 12 3/4' O.D. I 1-7.4 / LRIED L i PIPE PILE (TYP) U U Lf� Li- _. i --- J `EXIST. 12 (TYP).D. L6J4 10'-O" 5'-0" 3'-6" 30'-0" �� 3 PILE SPA = 15'-0" 1'- . Ul D N 0 O Z O 6'-.4�I WIDENING = 12'-B" l` EXISTING BRIDGE = 32'-0" I WIDENING - 15'-6" . T -u --IO < •• ..0 m -0 > c m 0 Pt r -1z O ) 17 -1 nm � LI O ,, > p ® m-< TYPICAL SECTION - WIQENED BRIDGE •• O z O 0 LOOKING WEST a O •'. z -r1 m o 4 B m m rn O T, _ > 0 D Scale in Feel o O = - mXl m D n Z Z N x 1 m 0, Q - t0 m O O Z 1.1 -9 Z Z v 0 \ 0 t.,.1 > u A 0 • EXHIBIT B . SLR 95-0005 FILL CEDER BY THE HEARS CFFIC. BONITA BRIDGE WIDENING CITY OF TIGARD 13125 SW HALL BOULEVARD TIGARD OR 97223 APPLICANT MATERIALS CITY OF TIGARD, OREGON SITE DEVELOPMENT REVIEW APPLICATION CITY OF TIGARD, 13125 SW Hall, PO Box 23397 Tigard, Oregon 97223 - (503) 639-4171 FOR STAFF USE ONLY CASE NO. sLR vl5-©w 5 OTHER CASE NO'S: RECEIPT NO. APPLICATION ACCEPTED BY: DATE: 1. GENERAL INFORMATION Application elements submitted: PROPERTY ADDRESS/LOCATION/30)64 4441) 6e,r%e5. (A) Application form (1) Vey FAA]00 (B) Owner' s signature/written TAX MAP AND TAX LOT NO. authorization ____(C) Title transfer instrument (1) SITE SIZE (D) Assessor' s map (1) PROPERTY OWNER/DEED HOLDER* an Of 77& ieD (E) Plot plan (pre-app checklist) ADDRESS 0/1i5" alta PHONE 6734/7/ (F) Applicant's statement CITY r2C-741Z-0 ZIP 9-7 Z.-7i3 (pre-app checklist) ,_PPLICANT* (Z( / ij ,p. (G) List of property owners and ADDRESS PHONE addresses within 250 feet (1) CITY ZIP (H) Filing fee ($ ) *When the owner and the applicant are different (I) Construction Cost Estimate people, the applicant must be the purchaser of record or a leasee in possession with written authorization DATE DETERMINED TO BE COMPLETE: from the owner or an agent of the owner with written authorization. The owner(s) must sign this application in the space provided on page two or FINAL DECISION DEADLINE: submit a written authorization with this application. COMP. PLAN/ZONE DESIGNATION: 2. PROPOSAL SUMMARY The owners of record of the subject property request site development review approval to N.P.O. Number: allow -Nit e 194.1 iii/h4ted -61)11(\.h 130( 46 Approval Date: (aO t Wa& Final Approval Date: Planning Engineering 0524P/13P Rev'd 5/87 3. List any variance, conditional use, sensitive lands, or other land use actions to be cogsidered as part of this application: k5 �"e�L S 417 1uth/k 40, 4. Applicants: To have a complete application you will need to submit attachments described in the attached information sheet at the time you submit this application. 5. THE APPLICANT(S) SHALL CERTIFY THAT: A. The above request does not violate any deed restrictions that may be attached to or imposed upon the subject property. B. If the application is granted, the applicant will exercise the rights granted in accordance with the terms and subject to all the conditions and limitations of the approval. C. All of the above statements and the statements in the plot plan, attachments, and exhibits transmitted herewith, are true; and the applicants so acknowledge that any permit issued, based on this application, may be revoked if it is found that any such statements are false. D. The applicant has read the entire contents of the application, including the policies and criteria, and understands the requirements for approving or denying the application. rth 9 DATED this day of A. 19 SIGNATURES of each owner (eg. husband and wife) of the subject property. �_ 11IA ,'t Ll i/. • V (KSL:pm/0524P) 0 PROPOSAL DESCRIPTION CITY OF TIGARD OREGON FILE NO: SENSITIVE LANDS REVIEW (SLR) 95-0005 FILE TITLE: BONITA BRIDGE WIDENING APPLICANT: CITY OF TIGARD OWNER: Same 13125 SW Hall Boulevard Tigard, OR 97223 REQUEST • A request for Sensitive Lands Review approval to allow the widening of a bridge over Fanno Creek from 30 feet to 60 feet, located on SW Bonita Road. LOCATION: SW Bonita Road crossing of Fanno Creek. APPLICABLE REVIEW CRITERIA: Community Development Code Sections 18.84. ZONE: I-L (Light Industrial). The Light Industrial zoning allows public support facilities, building maintenance services, manufacturing of finished products, packaging and processing, wholesale,storage, and distribution, among other uses. CIT: South, East CIT FACILITATOR: List Available Upon Request PHONE NUMBER: (503) DECISION MAKING BODY STAFF DECISION PLANNING COMMISSION DATE OF HEARING: TIME: 7:30 X HEARINGS OFFICER DATE OF HEARING: 5/8/95 TIME: 7:00 CITY COUNCIL DATE OF HEARING: TIME: 7:30 RELATIVE COMPONENTS AVAILABLE FOR VIEWING IN THE PLANNING DIVISION X VICINITY MAP LANDSCAPING PLAN NARRATIVE ARCHITECTURAL PLAN SITE PLAN X OTHER STAFF CONTACT: Will D'Andrea (503) 639-4171 x315 SLR 95-0005 BONITA BRIDGE WIDENING April 18,1995 :' ERDRUP CIVIL FUk1LHN 111 : 1` 0 2:;2i 3 FEB 17 '95 12 :/13 No .002 P' .0/I 4. PROPOSED PROJECT PURPOSE & DESCRIPTION Project Purpose and Need: The purpose of this project is to widen an existing three span bridge which carries Bonita Road over Fanno Creek. The existing bridge appears to be structurally adequate but is geometrically inadequate. The existing bridge does not meet current standards for lane and shoulder width and does not have adequate pedestrian sidewalks. The existing structure has one sidewalk on the south side of the bridge. The new bridge will improve traffic and pedestrian safety by providing adequate vehicular traffic lane width without a constriction at the bridge, shoulders separating the vehicular traffic lanes from the sidewalks, room for bicycle traffic on the shoulders, and adequate sidewalks on both sides of the bridge which will tie in to the existing and proposed sidewalks on the adjoining roadway. Project Description: The project consists of widening an existing three span bridge. The existing bridge is steel pile supported with cast in place concrete pile caps, sidewalks and curbs, and precast concrete panel deck with an asphalt cement concrete wearing surface. The widening will be accomplished by removing the existing railings, curbs, sidewalk, and asphalt roadway wearing surface and extending the existing structure to the north approximately 16' and to the south approximately 13'. Three new steel pipe piles will be added at each end of each existing pile bent, and three new steel pipe piles will be added at each end of each existing abutment. The new steel pipe piles will be the same outside diameter as the piles under the existing structure. New cast in place concrete pile caps and abutments will be tied in to both ends of the existing ones to extend the structure on each side. New precast concrete panels will be placed to span between the new pile caps and tied into the existing deck panels. New cast in place concrete sidewalks will be cast on each side of the widened structure. Tubular steel railings will be provided on each edge of the bridge. A cast in place concrete retaining wall will be located at the north edge of the bridge to retain the west approach fill. A new asphalt cement concrete wearing surface will be placed over the entire width of the widened bridge roadway. :VLK1ikUF 1..1',:'1 L ILO I LHH 111 : 11.U.:',2.:;26426 FEB 1 r"'35 12 :44 Nu . UU2 F• .U5 5. PROJECT IMPACTS AND ALTERNATIVES Describe alternative sites and project designs that were considered to avoid impacts to the waterway or wetland. The existing bridge alignment is closely bounded to the Northwest, Southwest, and Southeast by existing development. Moving the structure would require extensive roadway reconstruction. Changing the horizontal alignment of the roadway and bridge would also require disturbing other sections of Fanno Creek and abandoning the existing structure. Changing the vertical alignment of the bridge would require abandoning the existing structure and the construction of an all new structure. Two railing concepts were considered for the bridge. The proposed alternative of a tubular steel railing was chosen over a concrete barrier because it presents a more open structure should floodwaters crest over the bridge (which is the case for the design 100 year flood). Various alternatives for supporting the utilities which are carried on the existing bridge were considered. An arrangement similar to the existing which allows the conduits and pipes to hang below the deck of the bridge and partially block the bridge opening was abandoned in favor of routing conduits through the proposed sidewalks. This removes impediments to flow through the bridge opening. Hydraulic analysis (HEC-2) comparing the proposed structure to the existing structure indicates that the proposed widening will not cause a rise in the stream profile during the design 100 year flood event provided that piling similar to those existing are used to extend the structure and that no new obstructions to flow are placed in the channel near the bridge opening. The proposed structure meets these requirements. Describe what measures you will use (before and after construction) to minimize impacts to the waterway or wetland. Construction will be scheduled so that in water work only takes place during the approved in-water window. Fill and the retaining wall footing will be protected with rip-rap to prevent scour. The use of a retaining wall at the northwest abutment of the bridge minimizes the amount of fill which might enter the channel. Reasonable precautions including installation of protective covering, silt screens, and hay bales will be taken to prevent erosion of fill and impacts to water quality during construction. Filled areas will be seeded after construction to prevent erosion after construction. r • HYDRAULIC ANALYSIS OF FANNO CREEK AT THE BONITA ROAD BRIDGE TO ASSESS HYDRAULIC IMPACTS OF PROPOSED BRIDGE WIDENING FEBRUARY 20, 1995 S<to PROFfffi I �GINf4- Qy' Prepared for: tr v Aye 0,, 4, M. HoL1 Sverdrup Civil, Inc. �r �O P ~ 14,452 Prepared by: OzQ R• t&VniAdyt OUGON � 1G(y 26.Aie Otak, Inc. `'O R. GO�44 HYDRAULIC ANALYSIS OF FANNO CREEK AT THE BONITA ROAD BRIDGE TO ASSESS HYDRAULIC IMPACTS OF PROPOSED BRIDGE WIDENING BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE The City of Tigard, Oregon owns the bridge located at the intersection of Bonita Road and Fanno Creek. The City desires to widen the Bonita Road Bridge from its existing 34 foot +1- width to a 61 foot +1- width to improve traffic management in the vicinity of the bridge. The widening is proposed to take place both in the upstream and downstream directions, with pile supports placed in-line with the existing pile supports. The City Drainage Master Plan noted that the bridge was a constriction to flow but the Plan did not recommend replacement of the structure due to the lack of insurable structures upstream of the bridge. The bridge is considered structurally sound. The primary purpose of this hydraulic analysis of Fanno Creek, in the vicinity of the Bonita Road Bridge, is to assess the potential impacts to the 100 year floodplain elevation of the structural changes proposed to the bridge in the design of the widening. The secondary purpose of the analysis is to provide recommended modifications to the design of the bridge widening or the Fanno Creek channel to assure the project complies with the requirement for a zero rise in the 100 year floodplain. DATA AND INFORMATION The data and information use in this hydraulic analysis include the following: 1. The HEC-2 program code for the 100 year flood on Fanno Creek, which was assembled by the Corps of Engineers in 1976, and updated in 1982. The program code for Creek stations corresponding to river miles (RMS) 2.01 to 3.34 were used as a starting point. 2. The Flood Insurance Study (FIS) produced by the Federal Emergency Management Agency for the City of Tigard, Oregon, and dated September 1, 1981. 3. Engineering drawings of the Bonita Road Bridge by Sverdrup Civil, Inc. Drawings include a typical section of the existing bridge (looking west), a typical section of the proposed widened bridge (looking west), and an elevation of the proposed widened bridge (looking north). Drawings are dated 1-16-95. 4. Recent surveying data (undated) which includes the following: a. Channel section approximately 180 feet north (upstream) of bridge. b. Channel section north (upstream) of bridge. c. Channel section south (downstream) of bridge. d. Channel section 100 feet south (downstream) of bridge. e. Roadway profile north (upstream) side of roadway. f. Roadway profile south (downstream) side of roadway. g. Roadway profile at centerline of roadway. 5. Tracing of the Fanno Creek Flood Insurance Work Map (1"=400'). 1 6. City of Tigard contour map of bridge vicinity (2 foot intervals, 1"=100'). ASSUMPTIONS The hydraulic modeling of Fanno Creek in the vicinity of the Bonita Road Bridge has been conducted under the following assumptions: 1. The primary purpose of the modeling is to determine the relative difference in the 100 year floodplain elevation between the existing Bonita Road Bridge and the proposed widened bridge designs. The modeling is intended to resolve the change in the floodplain elevation caused by the proposed bridge widening. 2. The U.S. Army Corps of Engineers HEC-2 hydraulic modeling software is sufficiently sensitive to assess the proposed changes in the bridge design. 3. The original model input data is basically correct but requires revisions in the bridge vicinity, and general checking. 4. The revised survey is valid down to the water surface, below which few new point elevations were taken. Below the water surface, the creek channel bottom elevations in the original model produced for the flood study are to be considered more reliable. It is assumed these elevations have not changed significantly, and/or have changed an equivalent amount for each cross section. 5. The low chord is at elevation 135, which is 1 foot below the bottom of the bridge. This is to accommodate the effect of the pipes hanging down below the bottom of the bridge. 6. The pipe pile used to support the widened bridge will be 12 inch diameter, and will be placed in line with the existing pile. 7. The flow for the 100 year flood in Fanno Creek at Bonita Road is 4125 cubic feet per (CFS.) PROCESS The hydraulic modeling process involved obtaining all readily available printed materials which would provide information critical to the revision of the model. All of these materials were reviewed and evaluated for the value of the information to the model revision. Additional surveying information on channel cross sections and bridge/road profiles were requested and obtained. New survey data points were plotted and channel invert elevations were estimated and interpolated where insufficient data was available. To gather additional and first hand information, the modeler made a site visit to the Bonita Road Bridge. During the site visit, the hydraulic conditions present under the bridge and immediately upstream and downstream were investigated. The locations of the newly surveyed channel sections were checked to provide correlations between reality and the survey data. A search was made for local hydraulic conditions which might otherwise be unobservable from the review of the readily available printed maps, reports, and survey data. Observations were made that would later assist in assessing the reasonableness of the HEC-2 model output. Some of these observations may be useful to the City of Tigard and the Unified Sewerage Agency in their efforts to control the impacts of high flows to water quality in Fanno Creek and the Tualatin River. Those 2 observations are noted below. When all pertinent data were assembled and reviewed, the existing validated HEC-2 model was revised with the new survey data. The new survey channel cross section data and bridge profile data was coded into the existing model. Existing code for channel sections adjacent to new sections were revised to provide the appropriate relationship between each section required by the HEC-2 modeling software. The data required to run the special bridge routine was updated with the more detailed information provided by the survey. The following general changes were made to the base (existing) condition model code between the sections at RM 2.64 and RM 2.8. All model code upstream and downstream of the RM 2.64 and RM 2.8 sections, including those sections, have remained the same. Model Code change summary: 1. RM 2.67 section was added based on new survey data. 2. RM 2.68 section was revised based on new survey data. 3. RM 2.69 section was revised based on new survey data. 4. RM 2.70 section was added based on new survey data. 5. RM 2.71 section was deleted based on new survey data. 6. RM 2.73 section was added based on new survey data. This model was run and debugged to provide a new effective model representing the revised existing condition. New surface water elevations representing baseline conditions were provide by the revised model. Data representing the conditions produced under the proposed widened bridge were coded into the revised existing condition model to assess the relative impacts of the proposed bridge changes. This model was run to compute the expected water surface elevations under the conditions of the widened bridge. RESULTS The section of Fanno Creek modeled for the purpose of this study included river mile (RM) 2.01 through 3.34. Summary results from the model output for each station includes station (river mile) number, floodway width, section area, and mean velocity, and water surface elevation. Data for both existing bridge and proposed widened bridge conditions are presented side by side in the table below. The stations of greatest interest are stations at RM 2.69 and RM 2.70 which represent the location of the bridge and the channel section just upstream of the bridge, respectively. Any expected change in the floodplain elevation due to altered hydraulic conditions at the bridge would be most evident in these two sections. The water surface elevations for existing and proposed bridge conditions indicate no change in the 100 year floodplain due to proposed changes in the bridge. For each of the two bridge conditions, the floodway width, section area, and mean velocity of flow remain the same. This is due to the lack of proposed floodway changes 3 except for those made to the bridge structure. The model indicates the structural changes to be minor enough to produce no rise (or fall) in the floodplain elevation, thereby leaving the floodway characteristics unchanged. A sensitivity analysis was conducted on the pier coefficient, orifice loss coefficient, weir coefficient, and pier effective width for the 100 year flood. The most sensitive factor for this location, bridge, and flood is the width of the piers and the orifice loss conditions. These factors should not be of concern in the widening of the bridge as long as a similar type of pile is used for the widening, the piles are placed in line (flowline) with the existing pile, and no significant changes are made to the shape, size, or roughness of the floodway under the bridge. The model is insensitive to the weir coefficient because such a small percentage of flow over the bridge is to be expected at the 100 year flood. The model sensitivity to the weir coefficient was checked primarily to assess the impact of the different guardrail proposed for the widened bridge. It appears from the results of the model that the increased roughness caused by the proposed design would not cause an increase of the floodplain elevation for floods less than or equal to the 100 year flood. However, the proposed guardrail may cause an increase in the floodplain elevation for larger flood events such as the 500 year flood. The model indicates that the largest increase in the 100 year floodplain elevation in the near vicinity of the Bonita Road Bridge is the constricted and confined creek channel 100 feet downstream of the bridge. Its effect can be seen by noting the dramatic increase in velocity at RM 2.67, and an associated increase of 1.6 feet in the water surface elevation between this section and RM 2.68, which is on the downstream side of the bridge. The additional data from the surveying of section RM 2.67 is the reason the water surface elevations at the bridge are higher in this revised model than computed in the previous version of the model for Fanno Creek. A comparison of the base flood water surface elevations between the FIS model and the revised existing condition model shows an increase in the water surface elevation in the revised version. This does not necessarily mean that the base flood water surface elevation will be higher than established in the FIS. The purpose of this model revision was to establish the base flood elevation difference between the existing bridge conditions and the widened bridge conditions, and not to establish a new base flood elevation. However, the hydraulic effect of the narrow channel is very significant in this area. The short, narrow section may have been unintentionally excluded from the model for the FIS because it is too short to be picked up under the channel section placement and/or spacing employed. 4 HEC-2 Model output for existing and proposed Bonita Road Bridge conditions 100 Year Flood Conditions on Fanno Creek . __. _ _ __ FLOODWAY WATER SURFACE ELEVATION(FT) . STATION WIDTH SECTION MEAN (MILES) (FT) AREA VELOCITY EXISTING PROPOSED (SQ FT) (FT/SEC) BRIDGE BRIDGE 2.01 630. 2891. 1.4 132.1 132.1 2.41 384. 1592. 2.6 133.7 133.7 2.64 139. 1187. 3.5 135.2 135.2 2.67 54. 436. 9.6 135.2 135.2 2.68 194. 949. 4.3 136.8 136.8 2.69 195. 1006. 4.1 137.1 137.1 2.70 394. 1417. 2.9 137.3 137.3 2.73 420. 2181. 1.9 137.7 137.7 2.80 460. 2555. 1.6 138.0 138.0 3.14 345. 1710. 2.4 139.1 139.1 3.34 625. 2883. 1.4 140.1 140.1 5 RECOMMENDATIONS To assure no increase in the floodplain elevation caused by the widening of the Bonita Road Bridge, the following are recommended: 1. Use the same or similar type of pile. 2. Place new pile in line with the existing pile. 3. Maintain the low chord of the bridge at or above the 136 FT elevation. 4. Avoid reducing the size, altering the shape, or increasing the hydraulic roughness of the floodway underneath the bridge. 5. Raise all pipes and utilities carried by the bridge so that none hang down below the low chord of the bridge structure, currently proposed at elevation 136 FT. ADDITIONAL RECOMMENDATIONS The following recommendations pertain to the Fanno Creek stream channel just downstream of the bridge, and are not part of the recommendations specific to the bridge widening. 6. If the City wishes to reduce the floodplain elevation in the vicinity of the bridge, it should consider laying back the slopes of the channel represented by RM 2.67 section. This should be in conjunction with some stream bank stabilization and possibly some stream restoration. 7. The high velocities in the RM 2.67 section, combined with a flow directional shift, are contributing to the erosion of the west bank of the creek 100 feet downstream of the bridge. This area should be stabilized in conjunction with some channel alterations to reduce the velocity. 6 1 ** * HEC-2 WATER SURFACE PROFILES * * U.S. ARMY CORPS OF ENGINEERS * * * * HYDROLOGIC ENGINEERING CENTER * * Version 4.6.2; May 1991 * * 609 SECOND STREET, SUITE D * * * * DAVIS, CALIFORNIA 95616-4687 * RUN DATE 13FEB95 TIME 13:41:59 * * (916) 756-1104 * BONITA34.OUT EXISTING BRIDGE X X XXXXXXX XXXXX XXXXX X X X X X X X X X X X X XXXXXXX XXXX X XXXXX XXXXX X X X X X X X X X X X X X XXXXXXX XXXXX XXXXXXX 1 13FEB95 13:41:59 PAGE 1 THIS RUN EXECUTED 13FEB95 13:41:59 HEC-2 WATER SURFACE PROFILES Version 4.6.2; May 1991 T1 FANNO CREEK , RM 0.02 TO RM 12.88 T2 FLOODWAY ANALYIS W/0 ENCROACHMENTS, 100 YEAR FLOOD T3 FANNO CREEK/ BONITA BR. (EXISTING BRIDGE) T4 BONITA BRIDGE ANALYSIS T5 EXISTING 34 FOOT WIDE BRIDGE J1 ICHECK INQ NINV IDIR STRT METRIC HVINS Q WSEL FQ -1 2 0 0 0 0 0 132.06 0 J2 NPROF IPLOT PRFVS XSECV XSECH FN ALLDC IBW CHNIM ITRACE 1 0 -1 J3 VARIABLE CODES FOR SUMMARY PRINTOUT 150 200 38 1 52 3 61 53 27 21 22 28 54 4 34 J6 IHLEQ ICOPY SUBDIV STRTDS RMILE -1 NC .095 .105 .045 0 0 QT ' 2 4174 4174 ET 2.01 0 4.1 610 1240 X1 2.01 18 758 795 250 320 620 GR 145.8 507.0 146.8 548.0 140 562 134.2 583 134.2 600 GR 131.8 610 129 700 127.5 730 123.6 758 118.3 770 GR 118.3 775 122 795 126 810 128 950 128 1225 GR 130 1240 136 1303 144 1360 NH 4 .090 585 .052 622 .1 647 .065 785 0 ET 2.41 0 4.1 320 715 0 0 0 0 X1 2.41 18 585 622 1430 1750 2340 GR 144 120 138 256 134 320 130 492 129.8 571 GR 128.2 585 124 592 121.7 603 120.4 605 119.7 608 GR 120 611 120.5 614 121.7 616 125.4 622 127.7 647 GR 130 715 140 736 150 785 1 13FEB95 13:41:59 PAGE 2 NH 5 .105 625 .050 660 .1 670 .070 925 .1 NH 1020 ET 2.64 0 4.1 520 659.51 X1 2.64 23 625 660 750 850 1200 GR 150 0 146 10 144 45 144 100 142 185 GR 140 360 136 495 132 535 130 545 126 585 GR 124 625 121.4 630 121.4 636 120.8 641 121.4 646 GR 122 650 136 660 136.2 670 138 830 140 900 GR 144 925 146 975 150 1020 NC .085 .085 .052 .3 .5 ET 2.67 0 4.1 100 173 X1 2.67 16 112 173 150 150 150 GR 136 0 138 30 140 40 138 60 134 85 GR 137.6 100 136.6 103 136.6 112 133.2 124 125.1 138 GR 121 140 121 156 125.1 158 136.5 173 136.6 175 GR 138 300 QT 2 4125 4125 ET 2.68 0 4.1 200 400 X1 2.68 19 300 396 75 75 75 GR 140 15 138 100 134.1 300 132.6 310 130 320 GR 128.6 330 125.7 337.5 124.2 340 121 345 121 355 GR 124.4 360 125.3 363 129.2 366 129.8 370 130.8 380 GR 135.4 390 137.5 396 138 525 140 600 NC 0.090 0.090 0.050 ET 2.69•. 0 4.1 200 450 SB 1.05 1.6 2.5 0 15 3 812 3 121 120.9 x1 2.69 0 0 0 34 34 34 0 0 0 x2 0 0 1 135 137.8 BT 29 0 139.4 135 25 138.97 135 50 138.51 135 BT 75 138.1 135 100 137.88 135 125 137.68 135 150 BT 137.63 135 175 137.62 135 200 137.75 135 210 137.78 BT 135 220 137.78 135 230 137.77 135 240 137.8 135 BT 250 137.83 135 260 137.8 135 270 137.82 135 280 BT 137.84 135 290 137.8 135 296 137.78 135 300 137.72 BT 135 325 137.34 135 350 137.06 135 375 137.08 135 BT 400 137.29 135 425 137.48 135 450 137.82 135 475 BT 138.4 135 500 139.37 135 525 140.36 135 1 13FEB95 13:41:59 PAGE 3 NC .095 .090 .047 ET 2.70 0 4.1 60 600 X1 2.70 19 320 360 100 100 100 GR 140 60 138 140 136 260 133.6 300 131.6 310 GR 129.5 320 127.7 330 125.3 336 121 343 121 353 GR 125.5 360 125.4 370 128.3 380 128.8 390 134 396 GR 136 450 136 560 138 580 140 620 NC .075 .095 .051 ET 2.73 0 4.1 50 500 X1 2.73 27 185.5 223.5 230 80 170 GR 134 0 138 30 138 50 134 60 136.9 100 GR 135 114 134 138.5 133.6 158.5 132.9 177 131.1 185.5 GR 124.8 195.5 121.5 200 121.5 220 124.5 222.5 129.7 223.5 GR 128.1 233.5 130.6 243.5 130.7 253.5 130 263.5 131.2 273.5 GR 130.8 293.5 132.6 303.5 132.8 378.5 134.3 423.5 136 450 GR 138 475 140 500 ET 2.8 4.1 880 1340 X1 2.8 24 1099 1145 490 400 430 GR 144 480 142 675 140 750 138 875 136 905 GR 134 958 134.2 1042 130 1099 126.7 1106 123.6 1108 GR 121.7 1114 122.1 1117 123 1120 124 1125 126.7 1128 GR 128.4 1130 131.1 1138 130.9 1145 131.7 1170 132 1300 GR 134 1340 137 1360 140 1375 150 1470 NC .085 .080 .052 ET 3.14 0 4.1 85 430 X1 3.14 17 185 222 1260 1200 1800 GR 144 0 140 55 138 104 136 133 132 185 GR 125.6 198 125.9 200 126.6 203 126.9 206 128.2 209 GR 129.8 212 131.5 217 132 222 134 305 136 415 GR 140 445 144 490 NC .080., .080 .042 ET ' 3.34 0 4.1 935 1560 0 X1 3.34 21 1250 1283 990 1300 990 GR 148 535 146 670 144 760 142 865 140 915 GR 138 990 134 1172 134.2 1250 130.3 1259 127.8 1263 GR 128.1 1265 128.8 1268 129.1 1271 130.4 1274 132 1277 GR 133.7 1283 136 1420 136 1550 138 1593 140 1618 GR 150 1720 1 13FEB95 13:41:59 PAGE 4 SECNO DEPTH CWSEL CRIWS WSELK EG HV HL OLOSS L-BANK ELEV Q QLOB QCH QROB ALOB ACH AROB VOL TWA R-BANK ELEV TIME VLOB VCH VROB XNL XNCH XNR WTN ELMIN SSTA SLOPE XLOBL XLCH XLOBR ITRIAL IDC ICONT CORAR TOPWID ENDST *PROF 1 0 *SECNO 2.010 2.010 13.76 132.06 .00 132.06 132.18 .12 .00 .00 123.60 4174.0 431.1 1818.5 1924.4 446.1 440.3 2014.0 .0 .0 122.00 .00 .97 4.13 .96 .095 .045 .105 .000 118.30 608.92 .000606 250. 620. 320. 0 0 0 .00 652.71 1261.63 1490 NH CARD USED *SECNO 2.410 3302 WARNING: CONVEYANCE CHANGE OUTSIDE OF ACCEPTABLE RANGE, KRATIO = .64 2.410 14.02 133.72 .00 .00 133.95 .23 1.77 .00 128.20 4174.0 866.8 2080.6 1226.6 666.2 407.7 525.3 92.0 20.0 125.40 .16 1.30 5.10 2.34 .090 .052 .076 .000 119.70 331.90 .001458 1430. 2340. 1750. 2 0 0 .00 390.92 722.82 1490 NH CARD USED *SECNO 2.640 2.640 14.44 135.24 .00 .00 135.55 .31 1.60 .00 124.00 4174.0 1896.3 2277.7 .0 794.3 404.0 .0 120.9 25.2 136.00 .22 2.39 5.64 .00 .105 .050 .000 .000 120.80 502.58 .001760 750. 1200. 850. 2 0 0 .00 156.88 659.46 CCHV= .300 CEHV= .500 *SECNO 2.670 3265 DIVIDED FLOW 3301 HV CHANGED MORE THAN HVINS 3302 WARNING: CONVEYANCE CHANGE OUTSIDE OF ACCEPTABLE RANGE, KRATIO = .44 2.670'• 14.19 135.19 .00 .00 136.62 1.43 .51 .56 136.60 ,4174.0 8.6 4165.4 .0 7.4 434.3 .0 123.7 25.6 136.50 .23 1.16 9.59 .00 .085 .052 .000 .000 121.00 77.54 .009002 150. 150. 150. 2 0 0 .00 66.75 171.28 1 13FEB95 13:41:59 PAGE 5 SECNO DEPTH CWSEL CRIWS WSELK EG Hy HL OLOSS L-BANK ELEV Q QLOB ()CH QROB ALOB ACH AROB VOL TWA R-BANK ELEV TIME VLOB VCH VROB XNL XNCH XNR WIN ELMIN SSTA SLOPE XLOBL XLCH XLOBR ITRIAL IDC ICONT CORAR TOPWID ENDST *SECNO 2.680 3301 HV CHANGED MORE THAN HVINS 3302 WARNING: CONVEYANCE CHANGE OUTSIDE OF ACCEPTABLE RANGE, KRATIO = 2.02 2.680 15.83 136.83 .00 .00 137.22 .39 .29 .31 134.10 4125.0 190.9 3934.1 .0 191.2 767.4 .0 124.9 25.8 137.50 .23 1.00 5.13 .00 .085 .052 .000 .000 121.00 159.96 .002153 75. 75. 75. 3 0 0 .00 234.13 394.09 SPECIAL BRIDGE SB XK XKOR COFQ RDLEN BWC BWP BAREA SS ELCHU ELCHD 1.05 1.60 2.50 .00 15.00 3.00 812.00 3.00 121.00 120.90 *SECNO 2.690 PRESSURE FLOW EGPRS EGLWC H3 QWEIR QPR BAREA TRAPEZOID ELLC ELTRD WEIRLN AREA 137.47 137.25 .03 0. 4125. 812. 756. 135.00 137.80 0. 2.690 16.11 137.11 .00 .00 137.47 .36 .25 .00 134.10 4125.0 213.3 3911.7 .0 233.2 794.3 .0 125.7 26.0 137.50 .23 .91 4.92 .00 .090 .050 .000 .000 121.00 145.34 .001775 34. 34. 34. 2 0 0 .00 249.56 394.90 *SECNO 2.700 2.700 16.31 137.31 .00 .00 137.62 .31 .14 .01 129.50 4125.0 303.3 2758.6 1063.0 266.7 512.6 623.8 128.5 26.8 125.50 .24 1.14 5.38 1.70 .095 .047 .090 .000 121.00 181.35 .001069 100. 100. 100. 0 0 0 .00 391.76 573.11 *SECNO 2.730 3265 DIVIDED FLOW 1 , 13FEB95 13:41:59 PAGE 6 SECNO DEPTH CWSEL CRIWS WSELK EG HV HL OLOSS L-BANK ELEV 0 QLOB QCH QROB ALOB ACH AROB VOL TWA R-BANK ELEV TIME VLOB VCH VROB XNL XNCH XNR WTN ELMIN SSTA SLOPE XLOBL XLCH XLOBR ITRIAL IDC ICONT CORAR TOPWID ENDST 3280 CROSS SECTION 2.73 EXTENDED 3.68 FEET 2.730 16.18 137.68 .00 .00 137.80 .12 .12 .06 131.10 4125.0 518.0 2041.2 1565.9 466.2 533.4 1222.0 134.2 28.1 129.70 .26 1.11 3.83 1.28 .075 .051 .095 .000 121.50 .00 .000668 230. 170. 80. 2 0 0 .00 447.71 470.95 *SECNO 2.800 2.800 16.29 137.99 .00 .00 138.07 .08 .26 .01 130.00 4125.0 1032.3 1670.5 1422.3 851.5 526.1 1218.2 158.0 32.9 130.90 .32 1.21 3.18 1.17 .075 .051 .095 .000 121.70 875.09 .000530 490. 430. 400. 2 0 0 .00 489.88 1364.97 *SECNO 3.140 3302 WARNING: CONVEYANCE CHANGE OUTSIDE OF ACCEPTABLE RANGE, KRATIO = .66 3.140 13.48 139.08 .00 .00 139.24 .16 1.13 .04 132.00 4125.0 542.5 1713.8 1868.7 338.4 379.3 988.2 224.3 45.4 132.00 .45 1.60 4.52 1.89 .085 .052 .080 .000 125.60 77.63 .001228 1260. 1800. 1200. 2 0 0 .00 360.45 438.07 *SECNO 3.340 3302 WARNING: CONVEYANCE CHANGE OUTSIDE OF ACCEPTABLE RANGE, KRATIO = 1.54 3.340 12.26 140.06 .00 .00 140.12 .06 .85 .03 134.20 4125.0 1476.9 1043.6 1604.5 1284.0 307.5 1400.3 286.2 59.4 133.70 .64 1.15 3.39 1.15 .080 .042 .080 .000 127.80 913.45 .000518 990. 990. 1300. 2 0 0 .00 705.18 1618.63 1 13FEB95 13:41:59 PAGE 7 T1 FANNO CREEK , RM 0.02 TO RM 12.88 T2 FLOODWAY ANALYIS W/ ENCROACHMENTS, 100 YEAR FLOOD T3 FANNO CREEK T4 J1 ICHECK INQ NINV IDIR STRT METRIC HVINS 0 WSEL FQ -1 3 0 0 0 0 132.08 J2 NPROF IPLOT PRFVS XSECV XSECH FN ALLDC IBW CHNIM ITRACE 2 0 -1 1 13FEB95 13:41:59 PAGE 8 SECNO DEPTH CWSEL CRIWS WSELK EG HV HL OLOSS L-BANK ELEV Q OLOB QCH QROB ALOB ACH AROB VOL TWA R-BANK ELEV TIME VLOB VCH VROB XNL XNCH XNR WIN ELMIN SSTA SLOPE XLOBL XLCH XLOBR ITRIAL IDC ICONT CORAR TOPWID ENDST *PROF 2 0 *SECNO 2.010 3470 ENCROACHMENT STATIONS= 610.0 1240.0 TYPE= 1 TARGET= 630.000 2.010 13.78 132.08 .00 132.06 132.20 .12 .00 .00 123.60 4174.0 433.5 1818.4 1922.1 448.9 441.1 2000.6 .0 .0 122.00 .00 .97 4.12 .96 .095 .045 .105 .000 118.30 610.00 .000603 250. 620. 320. 0 0 0 .00 630.00 1240.00 1490 NH CARD USED *SECNO 2.410 3302 WARNING: CONVEYANCE CHANGE OUTSIDE OF ACCEPTABLE RANGE, KRATIO = .64 3470 ENCROACHMENT STATIONS= 320.0 715.0 TYPE= 1 TARGET= 395.000 2.410 14.04 133.74 .00 133.72 133.98 .24 1.77 .00 128.20 4174.0 880.6 2099.6 1193.7 670.9 408.3 512.4 91.7 19.4 125.40 .16 1.31 5.14 2.33 .090 .052 .076 .000 119.70 331.11 .001477 1430. 2340. 1750. 2 0 0 .00 383.89 715.00 1490 NH CARD USED *SECNO 2.640 3470 ENCROACHMENT STATIONS= 520.0 659.5 TYPE= 1 TARGET= 139.510 2.640 14.47 135.27 .00 135.24 135.58 .31 1.60 .00 124.00 4174.0 1896.0 2278.0 .0 782.2 405.0 .0 120.4 24.4 100000.00 .22 2.42 5.63 .00 .105 .050 .000 .000 120.80 520.00 .001749 750. 1200. 850. 2 0 0 .00 139.48 659.48 CCHV= .300 CEHV= .500 *SECNO 2.670 3301 HV CHANGED MORE THAN HVINS 3302 WARNING: CONVEYANCE CHANGE OUTSIDE OF ACCEPTABLE RANGE, KRATIO - .44 1 13FEB95'' 13:41:59 PAGE 9 SECNO DEPTH CWSEL CRIWS WSELK EG HV HL OLOSS L-BANK ELEV 0 QLOB OCH QROB ALOB ACH AROB VOL TWA R-BANK ELEV TIME VLOB VCH VROB XNL XNCH XNR WTN ELMIN SSTA SLOPE XLOBL XLCH XLOBR ITRIAL IDC ICONT CORAR TOPWID ENOST 3470 ENCROACHMENT STATIONS= 100.0 173.0 TYPE= 1 TARGET= 73.000 2.670 14.22 135.22 .00 135.19 136.64 1.42 .50 .56 136.60 4174.0 .0 4174.0 .0 .0 435.8 .0 123.2 24.7 100000.00 .23 .00 9.58 .00 .000 .052 .000 .000 121.00 116.87 .008966 150. 150. 150. 2 0 0 .00 54.45 171.32 *SECNO 2.680 3301 HV CHANGED MORE THAN HVINS 3302 WARNING: CONVEYANCE CHANGE OUTSIDE OF ACCEPTABLE RANGE, KRATIO = 2.04 3470 ENCROACHMENT STATIONS= 200.0 400.0 TYPE= 1 TARGET= 200.000 2.680 15.86 136.86 .00 136.83 137.24 .38 .29 .31 134.10 4125.0 210.1 3914.8 .0 178.8 770.4 .0 124.4 24.9 137.50 .23 1.18 5.08 .00 .085 .052 .000 .000 121.00 200.00 .002108 75. 75. 75. 3 0 0 .00 194.18 394.18 SPECIAL BRIDGE SB XK XKOR COFQ RDLEN BWC BWP BAREA SS ELCHU ELCHD 1.05 1.60 2.50 .00 15.00 3.00 812.00 3.00 121.00 120.90 *SECNO 2.690 PRESSURE FLOW EGPRS EGLWC H3 QWEIR QPR BAREA TRAPEZOID ELLC ELTRD WEIRLN AREA 137.50 137.27 .03 0. 4125. 812. 756. 135.00 137.80 0. 3470 ENCROACHMENT STATIONS= 200.0 450.0 TYPE= 1 TARGET= 250.000 2.690 16.15 137.15 .00 137.11 137.50 .35 .26 .00 134.10 4125.0 231.4 3893.6 .0 208.1 798.1 .0 125.1 25.1 137.50 .23 1.11 4.88 .00 .090 .050 .000 .000 121.00 200.00 .001733 34. 34. 34. 2 0 0 .00 195.02 395.02 1 13FEB95 13:41:59 PAGE 10 SECNO DEPTH CWSEL CRIWS WSELK EG HV HL OLOSS L-BANK ELEV Q QLOB QCH OROB ALOB ACH AROB VOL TWA R-BANK ELEV TIME VLOB VCH VROB XNL XNCH XNR WIN ELMIN SSTA SLOPE XLOBL XLCH XLOBR ITRIAL IDC ICONT CORAR TOPWID ENDST *SECNO 2.700 3470 ENCROACHMENT STATIONS= 60.0 600.0 TYPE= 1 TARGET= 540.000 2.700 16.34 137.34 .00 137.31 137.65 .31 .13 .01 129.50 4125.0 306.6 2750.8 1067.6 271.6 514.0 631.4 127.9 25.7 125.50 .24 1.13 5.35 1.69 .095 .047 .090 .000 121.00 179.23 .001053 100. 100. 100. 0 0 0 .00 394.23 573.46 *SECNO 2.730 3470 ENCROACHMENT STATIONS= 50.0 500.0 TYPE= 1 TARGET= 450.000 2.730 16.20 137.70 .00 137.68 137.83 .13 .12 .05 131.10 4125.0 489.5 2053.5 1582.0 418.8 534.3 1227.8 133.5 27.1 129.70 .26 1.17 3.84 1.29 .075 .051 .095 .000 121.50 50.75 .000673 230. 170. 80. 2 0 0 .00 420.50 471.25 *SECNO 2.800 3470 ENCROACHMENT STATIONS= 880.0 1340.0 TYPE= 1 TARGET= 460.000 2.800 16.32 138.02 .00 137.99 138.10 .08 .26 .01 130.00 4125.0 1048.5 1684.4 1392.1 856.5 527.3 1170.9 156.9 31.5 130.90 .31 1.22 3.19 1.19 .075 .051 .095 .000 121.70 880.00 .000535 490. 430. 400. 2 0 0 .00 460.00 1340.00 *SECNO 3.140 3302 WARNING: CONVEYANCE CHANGE OUTSIDE OF ACCEPTABLE RANGE, KRATIO = .67 3470 ENCROACHMENT STATIONS= 85.0 430.0 TYPE= 1 TARGET= 345.000 3.140 13.50 139.10 .00 139.08 139.26 .16 1.13 .04 132.00 4125.0 544.8 1708.1 1872.1 340.0 380.3 989.6 222.7 43.4 132.00 .45 1.60 4.49 1.89 .085 .052 .080 .000 125.60 85.00 .001209 1260. 1800. 1200. 2 0 0 .00 345.00 430.00 *SECNO 3.340 3302 WARNING: CONVEYANCE CHANGE OUTSIDE OF ACCEPTABLE RANGE, KRATIO = 1.51 1 13FEB95 13:41:59 PAGE 11 SECNO DEPTH CWSEL CRIWS WSELK EG HV HL OLOSS L-BANK ELEV 0 QLOB QCH OROB ALOB ACH AROB VOL TWA R-BANK ELEV TIME VLOB VCH VROB XNL XNCH XNR WTN ELMIN SSTA SLOPE XLOBL XLCH XLOBR ITRIAL IDC ICONT CORAR TOPWID ENDST 3470 ENCROACHMENT STATIONS= 935.0 1560.0 TYPE= 1 TARGET= 625.000 3.340 ' 12.29 140.09 .00 140.06 140.15 .06 .86 .03 134.20 4.125.0 1516.1 1064.0 1545.0 1286.4 308.5 1288.3 283.0 56.1 133.70 .63 1.18 3.45 1.20 .080 .042 .080 .000 127.80 935.00 .000533 990. 990. 1300. 2 0 0 .00 625.00 1560.00 1 13FEB95 13:41:59 PAGE 12 THIS RUN EXECUTED 13FEB95 13:42:00 NEC-2 WATER SURFACE PROFILES Version 4.6.2; May 1991 NOTE- ASTERISK (*) AT LEFT OF CROSS-SECTION NUMBER INDICATES MESSAGE IN SUMMARY OF ERRORS LIST FANNO CREEK/ BONITA BR. SUMMARY PRINTOUT SECNO CWSEL DIFKWS EG DIFEG SSTA STENCL STCHL STCHR STENCR ENDST TOPWID .01K 2.010 132.06 .00 132.18 .00 608.92 .00 758.00 795.00 .00 1261.63 652.71 1695.50 2.010 132.08 .02 132.20 .02 610.00 610.00 758.00 795.00 1240.00 1240.00 630.00 1700.39 * 2.410 133.72 .00 133.95 .00 331.90 .00 585.00 622.00 .00 722.82 390.92 1093.11 * 2.410 133.74 .02 133.98 .02 331.11 320.00 585.00 622.00 715.00 715.00 383.89 1086.24 2.640 135.24 .00 135.55 .00 502.58 .00 625.00 660.00 .00 659.46 156.88 994.80 2.640 135.27 .03 135.58 .03 520.00 520.00 625.00 660.00 659.51 659.48 139.48 998.16 * 2.670 135.19 .00 136.62 .00 77.54 .00 112.00 173.00 .00 171.28 66.75 439.93 * 2.670 135.22 .03 136.64 .03 116.87 100.00 112.00 173.00 173.00 171.32 54.45 440.82 * 2.680 136.83 .00 137.22 .00 159.96 .00 300.00 396.00 .00 394.09 234.13 888.93 * 2.680 136.86 .03 137.24 .02 200.00 200.00 300.00 396.00 400.00 394.18 194.18 898.55 2.690 137.11 .00 137.47 .00 145.34 .00 300.00 396.00 .00 394.90 249.56 979.22 2.690 137.15 .04 137.50 .03 200.00 200.00 300.00 396.00 450.00 395.02 195.02 990.83 2.700 137.31 .00 137.62 .00 181.35 .00 320.00 360.00 .00 573.11 391.76 1261.76 2.700 137.34 .03 137.65 .03 179.23 60.00 320.00 360.00 600.00 573.46 394.23 1271.19 2.730 137.68 .00 137.80 .00 .00 .00 185.50 223.50 .00 470.95 447.71 1595.43 2.730 137.70 .02 137.83 .03 50.75 50.00 185.50 223.50 500.00 471.25 420.50 1590.34 2.800 137.99 .00 138.07 .00 875.09 .00 1099.00 1145.00 .00 1364.97 489.88 1791.72 2.800 138.02 .03 138.10 .03 880.00 880.00 1099.00 1145.00 1340.00 1340.00 460.00 1783.69 * 3.140 139.08 .00 139.24 .00 77.63 .00 185.00 222.00 .00 438.07 360.45 1176.97 * 3.140 139.10 .03 139.26 .03 85.00 85.00 185.00 222.00 430.00 430.00 345.00 1186.18 * 3.340• 140.06 .00 140.12 .00 913.45 .00 1250.00 1283.00 .00 1618.63 705.18 1812.67 * . 3.340 140.09 .03 140.15 .03 935.00 935.00 1250.00 1283.00 1560.00 1560.00 625.00 1787.07 1 13FEB95 13:41:59 PAGE 13 FANNO CREEK/ BONITA BR. SUMMARY PRINTOUT TABLE 150 SECNO XLCH ELTRD ELLC ELMIN Q CNSEL CRIWS EG 10*KS VCH AREA .01K 2.010 .00 .00 .00 118.30 4174.00 132.06 .00 132.18 6.06 4.13 2900.42 1695.50 2.010 .00 .00 .00 118.30 4174.00 132.08 .00 132.20 6.03 4.12 2890.60 1700.39 * 2.410 2340.00 .00 .00 119.70 4174.00 133.72 .00 133.95 14.58 5.10 1599.11 1093.11 * 2.410 2340.00 .00 .00 119.70 4174.00 133.74 .00 133.98 14.77 5.14 1591.66 1086.24 2.640 1200.00 .00 .00 120.80 4174.00 135.24 .00 135.55 17.60 5.64 1198.33 994.80 2.640 1200.00 .00 .00 120.80 4174.00 135.27 .00 135.58 17.49 5.63 1187.19 998.16 * 2.670 150.00 .00 .00 121.00 4174.00 135.19 .00 136.62 90.02 9.59 441.74 439.93 * 2.670 150.00 .00 .00 121.00 4174.00 135.22 .00 136.64 89.66 9.58 435.76 440.82 * 2.680 75.00 .00 .00 121.00 4125.00 136.83 .00 137.22 21.53 5.13 958.60 888.93 * 2.680 75.00 .00 .00 121.00 4125.00 136.86 .00 137.24 21.08 5.08 949.14 898.55 2.690 34.00 137.80 135.00 121.00 4125.00 137.11 .00 137.47 17.75 4.92 1027.53 979.22 2.690 34.00 137.80 135.00 121.00 4125.00 137.15 .00 137.50 17.33 4.88 1006.19 990.83 2.700 100.00 .00 .00 121.00 4125.00 137.31 .00 137.62 10.69 5.38 1403.17 1261.76 2.700 100.00 .00 .00 121.00 4125.00 137.34 .00 137.65 10.53 5.35 1417.08 1271.19 2.730 170.00 .00 .00 121.50 4125.00 137.68 .00 137.80 6.68 3.83 2221.63 1595.43 2.730 170.00 .00 .00 121.50 4125.00 137.70 .00 137.83 6.73 3.84 2180.91 1590.34 2.800 430.00 .00 .00 121.70 4125.00 137.99 .00 138.07 5.30 3.18 2595.75 1791.72 2.800 430.00 .00 .00 121.70 4125.00 138.02 .00 138.10 5.35 3.19 2554.63 1783.69 * 3.140 1800.00 .00 .00 125.60 4125.00 139.08 .00 139.24 12.28 4.52 1705.91 1176.97 * 3.140 1800.00 .00 .00 125.60 4125.00 139.10 .00 139.26 12.09 4.49 1709.96 1186.18 * 3.340 990.00 .00 .00 127.80 4125.00 140.06 .00 140.12 5.18 3.39 2991.92 1812.67 * 3.340 990.00 .00 .00 127.80 4125.00 140.09 .00 140.15 5.33 3.45 2883.15 1787.07 1 13FEB95 13:41:59 PAGE 14 FANNO CREEK/ BONITA BR. SUMMARY PRINTOUT TABLE 150 SECNO Q CWSEL DIFWSP DIFWSX DIFKWS TOPWID XLCH 2.010 4174.00 132.06 .00 .00 .00 652.71 .00 2.010 4174.00 132.08 .02 .00 .02 630.00 .00 • * , 2.410 4174.00 133.72 .00 1.66 .00 390.92 2340.00 * 2.410 4174.00 133.74 .02 1.66 .02 383.89 2340.00 2.640 4174.00 135.24 .00 1.52 .00 156.88 1200.00 2.640 4174.00 135.27 .03 1.53 .03 139.48 1200.00 * 2.670 4174.00 135.19 .00 -.05 .00 66.75 150.00 * 2.670 4174.00 135.22 .03 -.05 .03 54.45 150.00 * 2.680 4125.00 136.83 .00 1.64 .00 234.13 75.00 * 2.680 4125.00 136.86 .03 1.64 .03 194.18 75.00 2.690 4125.00 137.11 .00 .28 .00 249.56 34.00 2.690 4125.00 137.15 .04 .29 .04 195.02 34.00 2.700 4125.00 137.31 .00 .19 .00 391.76 100.00 2.700 4125.00 137.34 .03 .19 .03 394.23 100.00 2.730 4125.00 137.68 .00 .37 .00 447.71 170.00 2.730 4125.00 137.70 .02 .36 .02 420.50 170.00 2.800 4125.00 137.99 .00 .32 .00 489.88 430.00 2.800 4125.00 138.02 .03 .32 .03 460.00 430.00 * 3.140 4125.00 139.08 .00 1.08 .00 360.45 1800.00 * 3.140 4125.00 139.10 .03 1.08 .03 345.00 1800.00 * 3.340 4125.00 140.06 .00 .99 .00 705.18 990.00 * 3.340 4125.00 140.09 .03 .99 .03 625.00 990.00 1 13FEB95 13:41:59 PAGE 15 SUMMARY OF ERRORS AND SPECIAL NOTES WARNING SECNO= 2.410 PROFILE= 1 CONVEYANCE CHANGE OUTSIDE ACCEPTABLE RANGE WARNING SECNO= 2.410 PROFILE= 2 CONVEYANCE CHANGE OUTSIDE ACCEPTABLE RANGE WARNING SECNO= 2.670 PROFILE= 1 CONVEYANCE CHANGE OUTSIDE ACCEPTABLE RANGE WARNING SECNO= 2.670 PROFILE= 2 CONVEYANCE CHANGE OUTSIDE ACCEPTABLE RANGE WARNING SECNO= 2.680 PROFILE= 1 CONVEYANCE CHANGE OUTSIDE ACCEPTABLE RANGE WARNING SECNO= 2.680 PROFILE= 2 CONVEYANCE CHANGE OUTSIDE ACCEPTABLE RANGE WARNING SECNO= 3.140 PROFILE= 1 CONVEYANCE CHANGE OUTSIDE ACCEPTABLE RANGE WARNING SECNO= 3.140 PROFILE= 2 CONVEYANCE CHANGE OUTSIDE ACCEPTABLE RANGE WARNING SECNO= 3.340 PROFILE= 1 CONVEYANCE CHANGE OUTSIDE ACCEPTABLE RANGE WARNING SECNO= 3.340 PROFILE= 2 CONVEYANCE CHANGE OUTSIDE ACCEPTABLE RANGE 1 13FEB95 13:41:59 PAGE 16 FLOOOWAY DATA, FANNO CREEK/ BONITA BR. PROFILE NO. 2 FLOODWAY WATER SURFACE ELEVATION STATION WIDTH SECTION MEAN WITH WITHOUT DIFFERENCE AREA VELOCITY FLOODWAY FLOODWAY 2.010 630. 2891. 1.4 132.1 132.1 .0 2.410 384. 1592. 2.6 133.7 133.7 .0 2.640 139. 1187. 3.5 135.2 135.2 .0 2.670 54. 436. 9.6 135.2 135.2 .0 2.680 194. 949. 4.3 136.8 136.8 .0 2.690 195. 1006. 4.1 137.1 137.1 .0 2.700 394. 1417. 2.9 137.3 137.3 .0 2.730 420. 2181. 1.9 137.7 137.7 .0 2.800 460. 2555. 1.6 138.0 138.0 .0 3.140 345. 1710. 2.4 139.1 139.1 .0 3.340 625. 2883. 1.4 140.1 140.1 .0 1 * MEC-2 WATER SURFACE PROFILES * * U.S. ARMY CORPS OF ENGINEERS * * * HYDROLOGIC ENGINEERING CENTER * Version 4.6.2; May 1991 * * 609 SECOND STREET, SUITE D * * * DAVIS, CALIFORNIA 95616-4687 * RUN DATE 13FEB95 TIME 13:43:24 * * (916) 756-1104 BONITA61 .OUT WIDENED BRIDGE X X XXXXXXX XXXXX XXXXX X X X X X X X X X X X X XXXXXXX XXXX X XXXXX XXXXX X X X X X X X X X X X X X XXXXXXX XXXXX XXXXXXX 1 13FEB95 13:43:24 PAGE 1 THIS RUN EXECUTED 13FEB95 13:43:24 HEC-2 WATER SURFACE PROFILES Version 4.6.2; May 1991 T1 FANNO CREEK , RM 0.02 TO RM 12.88 T2 FLOODWAY ANALYIS W/0 ENCROACHMENTS, 100 YEAR FLOOD T3 FANNO CREEK/ BONITA BR. (PROPOSED EXPANSION) T4 BONITA BRIDGE ANALYSIS T5 PROPOSED 61 FOOT WIDE BRIDGE J1 ICHECK INQ NINV IDIR STRT METRIC HVINS Q WSEL FQ -1 2 0 0 0 0 0 132.06 0 J2 NPROF IPLOT PRFVS XSECV XSECH FN ALLDC IBW CHNIM ITRACE 1 0 -1 J3 VARIABLE CODES FOR SUMMARY PRINTOUT 150 200 38 1 52 3 61 53 27 21 22 28 54 4 34 J6 IHLEQ ICOPY SUBDIV STRTDS RMILE -1 NC .095 .105 .045 0 0 CT 2 4174 4174 ET 2.01 0 4.1 610 1240 X1 2.01 18 758 795 250 320 620 GR 145.8 507.0 146.8 548.0 140 552 134.2 583 134.2 600 GR 131.8 610 129 700 127.5 730 123.6 758 118.3 770 GR 118.3 775 122 795 126 810 128 950 128 1225 GR 130 1240 136 1303 144 1360 NH 4 .090 585 .052 622 .1 647 .065 785 0 ET 2.41 0 4.1 320 715 0 0 0 0 X1 2.41 18 585 622 1430 1750 2340 GR 144 120 138 256 134 320 130 492 129.8 571 GR 128.2 585 124 592 121.7 603 120.4 605 119.7 608 GR 120 611 120.5 614 121.7 616 125.4 622 127.7 647 GR 130 715 140 736 150 785 1 13FEB95 13:43:24 PAGE 2 NH 5 .105 625 .050 660 .1 670 .070 925 .1 NH 1020 ET 2.64 0 4.1 520 659.51 X1 2.64 23 625 660 750 850 1200 GR 150 0 146 10 144 45 144 100 142 185 GR 140 360 136 495 132 535 130 545 126 585 GR 124 625 121.4 630 121.4 636 120.8 641 121.4 646 GR 122 650 136 660 136.2 670 138 830 140 900 GR 144 925 146 975 150 1020 NC .085 .085 .052 .3 .5 ET 2.67 0 4.1 100 173 X1 2.67 16 112 173 150 150 150 GR 136 0 138 30 140 40 138 60 134 85 GR 137.6 100 136.6 103 136.6 112 133.2 124 125.1 138 GR 121 140 121 156 125.1 158 136.5 173 136.6 175 GR 138 300 QT 2 4125 4125 ET 2.68 0 4.1 200 400 X1 2.68 19 300 396 75 75 75 GR 140 15 138 100 134.1 300 132.6 310 130 320 GR 128.6 330 125.7 337.5 124.2 340 121 345 121 355 GR 124.4 360 125.3 363 129.2 366 129.8 370 130.8 380 GR 135.4 390 137.5 396 138 525 140 600 NC 0.090 0.090 0.050 ET 2.69 ' • 0 4.1 200 450 SB ..1.05 1.6 2.3 0 15 3 812 3 121 120.9 X1 2.69 0 0 0 61 61 61 0 0 0 X2 0 0 1 135 137.8 BT 29 0 139.4 135 25 138.97 135 50 138.51 135 BT 75 138.1 135 100 137.88 135 125 137.68 135 150 BT 137.63 135 175 137.62 135 200 138.25 135 210 138.25 BT 135 220 138.25 135 230 138.25 135 240 138.25 135 BT 250 138.25 135 260 138.25 135 270 138.25 135 280 BT 138.25 135 290 138.25 135 296 138.25 135 300 137.72 BT 135 325 137.34 135 350 137.06 135 375 137.08 135 BT 400 137.29 135 425 137.48 135 450 137.82 135 475 BT 138.4 135 500 139.37 135 525 140.36 135 1 13FEB95 13:43:24 PAGE 3 NC .095 .090 .047 ET 2.70 0 4.1 60 600 X1 2.70 19 320 360 100 100 100 GR 140 60 138 140 136 260 133.6 300 131.6 310 GR 129.5 320 127.7 330 125.3 336 121 343 121 353 GR 125.5 360 125.4 370 128.3 380 128.8 390 134 396 GR 136 450 136 560 138 580 140 620 NC .075 .095 .051 ET 2.73 0 4.1 50 500 X1 2.73 27 185.5 223.5 230 80 170 GR 134 0 138 30 138 50 134 60 136.9 100 GR 135 114 134 138.5 133.6 158.5 132.9 177 131.1 185.5 GR 124.8 195.5 121.5 200 121.5 220 124.5 222.5 129.7 223.5 GR 128.1 233.5 130.6 243.5 130.7 253.5 130 263.5 131.2 273.5 GR 130.8 293.5 132.6 303.5 132.8 378.5 134.3 423.5 136 450 GR 138 475 140 500 ET 2.8 4.1 880 1340 X1 2.8 24 1099 1145 490 400 430 GR 144 480 142 675 140 750 138 875 136 905 GR 134 958 134.2 1042 130 1099 126.7 1106 123.6 1108 GR 121.7 1114 122.1 1117 123 1120 124 1125 126.7 1128 GR 128.4 1130 131.1 1138 130.9 1145 131.7 1170 132 1300 GR 134 1340 137 1360 140 1375 150 1470 NC .085 .080 .052 ET 3.14 0 4.1 85 430 X1 3.14 17 185 222 1260 1200 1800 GR 144 0 140 55 138 104 136 133 132 185 GR 125.6 198 125.9 200 126.6 203 126.9 206 128.2 209 GR 129.8 212 131.5 217 132 222 134 305 136 415 GR 140 445 144 490 NC .08G ' .080 .042 ET 3.34 0 4.1 935 1560 0 X1 3.34 21 1250 1283 990 1300 990 GR 148 535 146 670 144 760 142 865 140 915 GR 138 990 134 1172 134.2 1250 130.3 1259 127.8 1263 GR 128.1 1265 128.8 1268 129.1 1271 130.4 1274 132 1277 GR 133.7 1283 136 1420 136 1550 138 1593 140 1618 GR 150 1720 1 13FEB95 13:43:24 PAGE 4 SECNO DEPTH CWSEL CRIWS WSELK EG HV HL OLOSS L-BANK ELEV Q QLOB OCH QROB ALOB ACH AROB VOL TWA R-BANK ELEV TIME VLOB VCH VROB XNL XNCH XNR WTN ELMIN SSTA SLOPE XLOBL XLCH XLOBR ITRIAL IDC ICONT CORAR TOPWID ENDST *PROF 1 0 *SECNO 2.010 2.010 13.76 132.06 .00 132.06 132.18 .12 .00 .00 123.60 4174.0 431.1 1818.5 1924.4 446.1 440.3 2014.0 .0 .0 122.00 .00 .97 4.13 .96 .095 .045 .105 .000 118.30 608.92 .000606 250. 620. 320. 0 0 0 .00 652.71 1261.63 1490 NH CARD USED *SECNO 2.410 3302 WARNING: CONVEYANCE CHANGE OUTSIDE OF ACCEPTABLE RANGE, KRATIO = .64 2.410 14.02 133.72 .00 .00 133.95 .23 1.77 .00 128.20 4174.0 866.8 2080.6 1226.6 666.2 407.7 525.3 92.0 20.0 125.40 .16 1.30 5.10 2.34 .090 .052 .076 .000 119.70 331.90 .001458 1430. 2340. 1750. 2 0 0 .00 390.92 722.82 1490 NH CARD USED *SECNO 2.640 2.640 14.44 135.24 .00 .00 135.55 .31 1.60 .00 124.00 4174.0 1896.3 2277.7 .0 794.3 404.0 .0 120.9 25.2 136.00 .22 2.39 5.64 .00 .105 .050 .000 .000 120.80 502.58 .001760 750. 1200. 850. 2 0 0 .00 156.88 659.46 CCHV= .300 CEHV= .500 *SECNO 2.670 3265 DIVIDED FLOW 3301 HV CHANGED MORE THAN HVINS 3302 WARNING: CONVEYANCE CHANGE OUTSIDE OF ACCEPTABLE RANGE, KRATIO = .44 2.670• . 14.19 135.19 .u0 .00 136.62 1.43 .51 .56 136.60 4174.0 8.6 4165.4 .0 7.4 434.3 .0 123.7 25.6 136.50 .23 1.16 9.59 .00 .085 .052 .000 .000 121.00 77.54 .009002 150. 150. 150. 2 0 0 .00 66.75 171.28 1 13FEB95 13:43:24 PAGE 5 SECNO DEPTH CWSEL CRIWS WSELK EG HV HL OLOSS L-BANK ELEV Q QLOB QCH QROB ALOB ACH AROB VOL TWA R-BANK ELEV TIME VLOB VCH VROB XNL XNCH XNR WTN ELMIN SSTA SLOPE XLOBL XLCH XLOBR ITRIAL IDC ICONT CORAR TOPWID ENDST *SECNO 2.680 3301 HV CHANGED MORE THAN HVINS 3302 WARNING: CONVEYANCE CHANGE OUTSIDE OF ACCEPTABLE RANGE, KRATIO = 2.02 2.680 15.83 136.83 .00 .00 137.22 .39 .29 .31 134.10 4125.0 190.9 3934.1 .0 191.2 767.4 .0 124.9 25.8 137.50 .23 1.00 5.13 .00 .085 .052 .000 .000 121.00 159.96 .002153 75. 75. 75. 3 0 0 .00 234.13 394.09 SPECIAL BRIDGE SB XK XKOR COFQ RDLEN BWC BWP BAREA SS ELCHU ELCHD 1.05 1.60 2.30 .00 15.00 3.00 812.00 3.00 121.00 120.90 *SECNO 2.690 PRESSURE FLOW EGPRS EGLWC H3 OWEIR QPR BAREA TRAPEZOID ELLC ELTRD WEIRLN AREA 137.47 137.25 .03 0. 4125. 812. 756. 135.00 137.80 0. 2.690 16.11 137.11 .00 .00 137.47 .36 .25 .00 134.10 4125.0 213.3 3911.7 .0 233.2 794.3 .0 126.3 26.2 137.50 .24 .91 4.92 .00 .090 .050 .000 .000 121.00 145.34 .001775 61. 61. 61. 2 0 0 .00 249.56 394.90 *SECNO 2.700 2.700 16.31 137.31 .00 .00 137.62 .31 .14 .01 129.50 4125.0 303.3 2758.6 1063.0 266.7 512.6 623.8 129.1 26.9 125.50 .24 1.14 5.38 1.70 .095 .047 .090 .000 121.00 181.35 .001069 100. 100. 100. 0 0 0 .00 391.76 573.11 *SECNO 2.730 3265 DIVIDED FLOW 1 13FEB95 13:43:24 PAGE 6 SECNO DEPTH CWSEL CRIWS WSELK EG HV HL OLOSS L-BANK ELEV Q QLOB QCH QROB ALOB ACH AROB VOL TWA R-BANK ELEV TIME VLOB VCH VROB XNL XNCH XNR WTN ELMIN SSTA SLOPE XLOBL XLCH XLOBR ITRIAL IDC ICONT CORAR TOPWID ENDST 3280 CROSS SECTION 2.73 EXTENDED 3.68 FEET 2.730 16.18 137.68 .00 .00 137.80 .12 .12 .06 131.10 4125.0 518.0 2041.2 1565.9 466.2 533.4 1222.0 134.8 28.3 129.70 .26 1.11 3.83 1.28 .075 .051 .095 .000 121.50 .00 .000668 230. 170. 80. 2 0 0 .00 447.71 470.95 *SECNO 2.800 2.800 16.29 137.99 .00 .00 138.07 .08 .26 .01 130.00 4125.0 1032.3 1670.5 1422.3 851.5 526.1 1218.2 158.6 33.0 130.90 .32 1.21 3.18 1.17 .075 .051 .095 .000 121.70 875.09 .000530 490. 430. 400. 2 0 0 .00 489.88 1364.97 *SECNO 3.140 3302 WARNING: CONVEYANCE CHANGE OUTSIDE OF ACCEPTABLE RANGE, KRATIO = .66 3.140 13.48 139.08 .00 .00 139.24 .16 1.13 .04 132.00 4125.0 542.5 1713.8 1868.7 338.4 379.3 988.2 224.9 45.5 132.00 .46 1.60 4.52 1.89 .085 .052 .080 .000 125.60 77.63 .001228 1260. 1800. 1200. 2 0 0 .00 360.45 438.07 *SECNO 3.340 3302 WARNING: CONVEYANCE CHANGE OUTSIDE OF ACCEPTABLE RANGE, KRATIO = 1.54 3.340 12.26 140.06 .00 .00 140.12 .06 .85 .03 134.20 4125.0 1476.9 1043.6 1604.5 1284.0 307.5 1400.3 286.8 59.6 133.70 .64 1.15 3.39 1.15 .080 .042 .080 .000 127.80 913.45 .000518 990. 990. 1300. 2 0 0 .00 705.18 1618.63 1 13FEB95 13:43:24 PAGE 7 T1 FANNO CREEK , RM 0.02 TO RM 12.88 T2 FLOODWAY ANALYIS W/ ENCROACHMENTS, 100 YEAR FLOOD 73 FANNO CREEK T4 J1 ICHECK INQ NINV IDIR STRT METRIC HVINS 0 WSEL FQ -1 3 0 0 0 0 132.08 J2 NPROF IPLOT PRFVS XSECV XSECH FN ALLDC I8W CHNIM ITRACE 2 0 -1 1 13FEB95 13:43:24 PAGE 8 SECNO DEPTH CWSEL CRIWS WSELK EG HV HL OLOSS L-BANK ELEV Q QLOB QCH QROB ALOB ACH AROB VOL TWA R-BANK ELEV TIME VLOB VCH VROB XNL XNCH XNR WTN ELMIN SSTA SLOPE XLOBL XLCH XLOBR ITRIAL IOC ICONT CORAR TOPWID ENDST *PROF 2 0 *SECNO 2.010 3470 ENCROACHMENT STATIONS= 610.0 1240.0 TYPE= 1 TARGET= 630.000 2.010 13.78 132.08 .00 132.06 132.20 .12 .00 .00 123.60 4174.0 433.5 1818.4 1922.1 448.9 441.1 2000.6 .0 .0 122.00 .00 .97 4.12 .96 .095 .045 .105 .000 118.30 610.00 .000603 250. 620. 320. 0 0 0 .00 630.00 1240.00 1490 NH CARD USED *SECNO 2.410 3302 WARNING: CONVEYANCE CHANGE OUTSIDE OF ACCEPTABLE RANGE, KRATIO = .64 3470 ENCROACHMENT STATIONS= 320.0 715.0 TYPE= 1 TARGET= 395.000 2.410 14.04 133.74 .00 133.72 133.98 .24 1.77 .00 128.20 4174.0 880.6 2099.6 1193.7 670.9 408.3 512.4 91.7 19.4 125.40 .16 1.31 5.14 2.33 .090 .052 .076 .000 119.70 331.11 .001477 1430. 2340. 1750. 2 0 0 .00 383.89 715.00 1490 NH CARD USED *SECNO 2.640 347 ENCROACHMENT STATIONS= 520.0 659.5 TYPE= 1 TARGET= 139.510 2.640 14.47 135.27 .00 135.24 135.58 .31 1.60 .00 124.00 174.0 1896.0 2278.0 0 782.2 405.0 .0 120.4 24.4 100000.00 .22 2.42 5.63 .00 .105 .050 .000 .000 120.80 520.00 .001749 750. 1200. 850. 2 0 0 .00 139.48 659.48 CCHV= .300 CEHV= .500 *SECNO 2.670 3301 HV CHANGED MORE THAN HVINS 3302 WARNING: CONVEYANCE CHANGE OUTSIDE OF ACCEPTABLE RANGE, KRATIO = .44 1 13FEB95, , 13:43:24 PAGE 9 SECNO DEPTH CWSEL CRIWS WSELK EG HV HL OLOSS L-BANK ELEV Q QLOB OCH QROB ALOB ACH AROB VOL TWA R-BANK ELEV TIME VLOB VCH VROB XNL XNCH XNR WTN ELMIN SSTA SLOPE XLOBL XLCH XLOBR ITRIAL IDC ICONT CORAR TOPWID ENDST 3470 ENCROACHMENT STATIONS= 100.0 173.0 TYPE= 1 TARGET= 73.000 2.670 14.22 135.22 .00 135.19 136.64 1.42 .50 .56 136.60 4174.0 .0 4174.0 .0 .0 435.8 .0 123.2 24.7 100000.00 .23 .00 9.58 .00 .000 .052 .000 .000 121.00 116.87 .008966 150. 150. 150. 2 0 0 .00 54.45 171.32 *SECNO 2.680 3301 HV CHANGED MORE THAN HVINS 3302 WARNING: CONVEYANCE CHANGE OUTSIDE OF ACCEPTABLE RANGE, KRATIO = 2.04 3470 ENCROACHMENT STATIONS= 200.0 400.0 TYPE= 1 TARGET= 200.000 2.680 15.86 136.86 .00 136.83 137.24 .38 .29 .31 134.10 4125.0 210.1 3914.8 .0 178.8 770.4 .0 124.4 24.9 137.50 .23 1.18 5.08 .00 .085 .052 .000 .000 121.00 200.00 .002108 75. 75. 75. 3 0 0 .00 194.18 394.18 SPECIAL BRIDGE SB XK XKOR COFQ RDLEN BWC BWP BAREA SS ELCHU ELCHD 1.05 1.60 2.30 .00 15.00 3.00 812.00 3.00 121.00 120.90 *SECNO 2.690 PRESSURE FLOW EGPRS EGLWC H3 QWEIR QPR BAREA TRAPEZOID ELLC ELTRD WEIRLN AREA 137.50 137.27 .03 0. 4125. 812. 756. 135.00 137.80 0. 3470 ENCROACHMENT STATIONS= 200.0 450.0 TYPE= 1 TARGET= 250.000 2.690 16.15 137.15 .00 137.11 137.50 .35 .26 .00 134.10 4125.0 231.4 3893.6 .0 208.1 798.1 .0 125.7 25.2 137.50 .23 1.11 4.88 .00 .090 .050 .000 .000 121.00 200.00 .001733 61. 61. 61. 2 0 0 .00 195.02 395.02 1 13FEB95 13:43:24 PAGE 10 SECNO DEPTH CWSEL CRIWS WSELK EG HV HL OLOSS L-BANK ELEV Q • OLOB QCH QROB ALOB ACH AROB VOL IwA R-BANK ELEV TIME VLOB VCH VROB XNL XNCH XNR WIN ELMIN SSTA SLOPE XLOBL XLCH XLOBR ITRIAL IDC ICONT CORAR TOPWID ENDST *SECNO 2.700 3470 ENCROACHMENT STATIONS= 60.0 600.0 TYPE= 1 TARGET= 540.000 2.700 16.34 137.34 .00 137.31 137.65 .31 .13 .01 129.50 4125.0 306.6 2750.8 1067.6 271.6 514.0 631.4 128.5 25.9 125.50 .24 1.13 5.35 1.69 .095 .047 .090 .000 121.00 179.23 .001053 100. 100. 100. 0 0 0 .00 394.23 573.46 *SECNO 2.730 3470 ENCROACHMENT STATIONS= 50.0 500.0 TYPE= 1 TARGET= 450.000 2.730 16.20 137.70 .00 137.68 137.83 .13 .12 .05 131.10 4125.0 489.5 2053.5 1582.0 418.8 534.3 1227.8 134.1 27.2 129.70 .26 1.17 3.84 1.29 .075 .051 .095 .000 121.50 50.75 .000673 230. 170. 80. 2 0 0 .00 420.50 471.25 *SECNO 2.800 3470 ENCROACHMENT STATIONS= 880.0 1340.0 TYPE= 1 TARGET= 460.000 2.800 16.32 138.02 .00 137.99 138.10 .08 .26 .01 130.00 4125.0 1048.5 1684.4 1392.1 856.5 527.3 1170.9 157.5 31.6 130.90 .32 1.22 3.19 1.19 .075 .051 .095 .000 121.70 880.00 .000535 490. 430. 400. 2 0 0 .00 460.00 1340.00 *SECNO 3.140 3302 WARNING: CONVEYANCE CHANGE OUTSIDE OF ACCEPTABLE RANGE, KRATIO = .67 3470 ENCROACHMENT STATIONS= 85.0 430.0 TYPE= 1 TARGET= 345.000 3.140 13.50 139.10 .00 139.08 139.26 .16 1.13 .04 132.00 4125.0 544.8 1708.1 1872.1 340.0 380.3 989.6 223.3 43.5 132.00 .45 1.60 4.49 1.89 .085 .052 .080 .000 125.60 85.00 .001209 1260. 1800. 1200. 2 0 0 .00 345.00 430.00 *SECNO 3.340 3302 WARNING: CONVEYANCE CHANGE OUTSIDE OF ACCEPTABLE RANGE, KRATIO = 1.51 1 13FEB95 13:43:24 PAGE 11 SECNO DEPTH CWSEL CRIWS WSELK EG HV HL OLOSS L-BANK ELEV 0 MOB QCH QROB ALOB ACH AROB VOL TWA R-BANK ELEV TIME VLOB VCH VROB XNL XNCH XNR WIN ELMIN SSTA SLOPE XLOBL XLCH XLOBR ITRIAL IDC ICONT CORAR TOPWID ENDST 3470 ENCROACHMENT STATIONS= 935.0 1560.0 TYPE= 1 TARGET= 625.000 3.340 12.29 140.09 140.06 140.15 .06 .86 .03 134.20 4125.0 1516.1 1064.0 1545.0 1286.4 308.5 1288.3 283.6 56.2 133.70 - .63 1.18 3.45 1.20 .080 .042 .080 .000 127.80 935.00 .000533 990. 990. 1300. 2 0 0 .00 625.00 1560.00 1 13FEB95 13:43:24 PAGE 12 THIS RUN EXECUTED 13FEB95 13:43:25 ************************************* HEC-2 WATER SURFACE PROFILES Version 4.6.2; May 1991 ************************************* NOTE- ASTERISK (*) AT LEFT OF CROSS-SECTION NUMBER INDICATES MESSAGE IN SUMMARY OF ERRORS LIST FANNO CREEK/ BONITA BR. SUMMARY PRINTOUT SECNO CWSEL DIFKWS EG DIFEG SSTA STENCL STCHL STCHR STENCR ENDST TOPWID .01K 2.010 132.06 .00 132.18 .00 608.92 .00 758.00 795.00 .00 1261.63 652.71 1695.50 2.010 132.08 .02 132.20 .02 610.00 610.00 758.00 795.00 1240.00 1240.00 630.00 1700.39 * 2.410 133.72 .00 133.95 .00 331.90 .00 585.00 622.00 .00 722.82 390.92 1093.11 * 2.410 133.74 .02 133.98 .02 331.11 320.00 585.00 622.00 715.00 715.00 383.89 1086.24 2.640 135.24 .00 135.55 .00 502.58 .00 625.00 660.00 .00 659.46 156.88 994.80 2.640 135.27 .03 135.58 .03 520.00 520.00 625.00 660.00 659.51 659.48 139.48 998.16 * 2.670 135.19 .00 136.62 .00 77.54 .00 112.00 173.00 .00 171.28 66.75 439.93 * 2.670 135.22 .03 136.64 .03 116.87 100.00 112.00 173.00 173.00 171.32 54.45 440.82 * 2.680 136.83 .00 137.22 .00 159.96 .00 300.00 396.00 .00 394.09 234.13 888.93 * 2.680 136.86 .03 137.24 .02 200.00 200.00 300.00 396.00 400.00 394.18 194.18 898.55 2.690 137.11 .00 137.47 .00 145.34 .00 300.00 396.00 .00 394.90 249.56 979.22 2.690 137.15 .04 137.50 .03 200.00 200.00 300.00 396.00 450.00 395.02 195.02 990.83 2.700 137.31 .00 137.62 .00 181.35 .00 320.00 360.00 .00 573.11 391.76 1261.76 2.700 137.34 .03 137.65 .03 179.23 60.00 320.00 360.00 600.00 573.46 394.23 1271.19 2.730 137.68 .00 137.80 .00 .00 .00 185.50 223.50 .00 470.95 447.71 1595.43 2.730 137.70 .02 137.83 .03 50.75 50.00 185.50 223.50 500.00 471.25 420.50 1590.34 2.800 137.99 .00 138.07 .00 875.09 .00 1099.00 1145.00 .00 1364.97 489.88 1791.72 2.800 138.02 .03 138.10 .03 880.00 880.00 1099.00 1145.00 1340.00 1340.00 460.00 1783.69 * 3.140 139.08 .00 139.24 .00 77.63 .00 185.00 222.00 .00 438.07 360.45 1176.97 * 3.140 139.10 .03 139.26 .03 85.00 85.00 185.00 222.00 430.00 430.00 345.00 1186.18 * 3.34Q 140.06 .00 14k.. . .00 913.45 .00 1250.00 ,83.00 .00 1618.63 705.18 1812.67 * 3.340 140.09 .03 140.15 .03 935.00 935.00 1250.00 1283.00 1560.00 1560.00 625.00 1787.07 1 13FEB95 13:43:24 PAGE 13 FANNO CREEK/ BONITA BR. SUMMARY PRINTOUT TABLE 150 SECNO XLCH ELTRD ELLC ELMIN Q CWSEL CRIWS EG 10*KS VCH AREA .01K 2.010 .00 .00 .00 118.30 4174.00 132.06 .00 132.18 6.06 4.13 2900.42 1695.50 2.010 .00 .00 .00 118.30 4174.00 132.08 .00 132.20 6.03 4.12 2890.60 1700.39 * 2.410 2340.00 .00 .00 119.70 4174.00 133.72 .00 133.95 14.58 5.10 1599.11 1093.11 * 2.410 2340.00 .00 .00 119.70 4174.00 133.74 .00 133.98 14.77 5.14 1591.66 1086.24 2.640 1200.00 .00 .00 120.80 4174.00 135.24 .00 135.55 17.60 5.64 1198.33 994.80 2.640 1200.00 .00 .00 120.80 4174.00 135.27 .00 135.58 17.49 5.63 1187.19 998.16 * 2.670 150.00 .00 .00 121.00 4174.00 135.19 .00 136.62 90.02 9.59 441.74 439.93 * 2.670 150.00 .00 .00 121.00 4174.00 135.22 .00 136.64 89.66 9.58 435.76 440.82 * 2.680 75.00 .00 .00 121.00 4125.00 136.83 .00 137.22 21.53 5.13 958.60 888.93 * 2.680 75.00 .00 .00 121.00 4125.00 136.86 .00 137.24 21.08 5.08 949.14 898.55 2.690 61.00 137.80 135.00 121.00 4125.00 137.11 .00 137.47 17.75 4.92 1027.53 979.22 2.690 61.00 137.80 135.00 121.00 4125.00 137.15 .00 137.50 17.33 4.88 1006.19 990.83 2.700 100.00 .00 .00 121.00 4125.00 137.31 .00 137.62 10.69 5.38 1403.17 1261.76 2.700 100.00 .00 .00 121.00 4125.00 137.34 .00 137.65 10.53 5.35 1417.08 1271.19 2.730 170.00 .00 .00 121.50 4125.00 137.68 .00 137.80 6.68 3.83 2221.63 1595.43 2.730 170.00 .00 .00 121.50 4125.00 137.70 .00 137.83 6.73 3.84 2180.91 1590.34 2.800 430.00 .00 .00 121.70 4125.00 137.99 .00 138.07 5.30 3.18 2595.75 1791.72 2.800 430.00 .00 .00 121.70 4125.00 138.02 .00 138.10 5.35 3.19 2554.63 1783.69 * 3.140 1800.00 .00 .00 125.60 4125.00 139.08 .00 139.24 12.28 4.52 1705.91 1176.97 * 3.140 1800.00 .00 .00 125.60 4125.00 139.10 .00 139.26 12.09 4.49 1709.96 1186.18 * 3.340 990.00 .00 .00 127.80 4125.00 140.06 .00 140.12 5.18 3.39 2991.92 1812.67 * 3.340 990.00 .00 .00 127.80 4125.00 140.09 .00 140.15 5.33 3.45 2883.15 1787.07 1 13FEB95 13:43:24 PAGE 14 FANNO CREEK/ BONITA BR. SUMMARY PRINTOUT TABLE 150 SECNO Q CWSEL DIFWSP DIFWSX DIFKSS TOPWID XLCH 2.010 4174.00 132.06 .00 .00 .00 652.71 .00 2.010 4174.00 132.08 .02 .00 .02 630.00 .00 * 2.410 4174.00 133.72 .00 1.66 .00 390.92 2340.00 * ' 2.410 4174.00 133.74 .02 1.66 .02 383.89 2340.00 2.640 4174.00 135.24 .00 1.52 .00 156.88 1200.00 2.640 4174.00 135.27 .03 1.53 .03 139.48 1200.00 * 2.670 4174.00 135.19 .00 -.05 .00 66.75 150.00 * 2.670 4174.00 135.22 .03 -.05 .03 54.45 150.00 * 2.680 4125.00 136.83 .00 1.64 .00 234.13 75.00 * 2.680 4125.00 136.86 .03 1.64 .03 194.18 75.00 2.690 4125.00 137.11 .00 .28 .00 249.56 61.00 2.690 4125.00 137.15 .04 .29 .04 195.02 61.00 2.700 4125.00 137.31 .00 .19 .00 391.76 100.00 2.700 4125.00 137.34 .03 .19 .03 394.23 100.00 2.730 4125.00 137.68 .00 .37 .00 447.71 170.00 2.730 4125.00 137.70 .02 .36 .02 420.50 170.00 2.800 4125.00 137.99 .00 .32 .00 489.88 430.00 2.800 4125.00 138.02 .03 .32 .03 460.00 430.00 * 3.140 4125.00 139.08 .00 1.08 .00 360.45 1800.00 * 3.140 4125.00 139.10 .03 1.08 .03 345.00 1800.00 * 3.340 4125.00 140.06 .00 .99 .00 705.18 990.00 * 3.340 4125.00 140.09 .03 .99 .03 625.00 990.00 1 13FEB95 13:43:24 PAGE 15 SUMMARY OF ERRORS AND SPECIAL NOTES WARNING SECNO= 2.410 PROFILE= 1 CONVEYANCE CHANGE OUTSIDE ACCEPTABLE RANGE WARNING SECNO= 2.410 PROFILE= 2 CONVEYANCE CHANGE OUTSIDE ACCEPTABLE RANGE WARNING SECNO= 2.670 PROFILE= 1 CONVEYANCE CHANGE OUTSIDE ACCEPTABLE RANGE WARNING SECNO= 2.670 PROFILE= 2 CONVEYANCE CHANGE OUTSIDE ACCEPTABLE RANGE WARNING SECNO= 2.680 PROFILE= 1 CONVEYANCE CHANGE OUTSIDE ACCEPTABLE RANGE WARNING SECNO= 2.680 PROFILE= 2 CONVEYANCE CHANGE OUTSIDE ACCEPTABLE RANGE WARNING SECNO= 3.140 PROFILE= 1 CONVEYANCE CHANGE OUTSIDE ACCEPTABLE RANGE WARNING SECNO= 3.140 PROFILE= 2 CONVEYANCE CHANGE OUTSIDE ACCEPTABLE RANGE WARNING SECNO= 3.340 PROFILE= 1 CONVEYANCE CHANGE OUTSIDE ACCEPTABLE RANGE WARNING SECNO= 3.340 PROFILE= 2 CONVEYANCE CHANGE OUTSIDE ACCEPTABLE RANGE 1 13FEB95 13:43:24 PAGE 16 FLOODWAY DATA, FANNO CREEK/ BONITA BR. PROFILE NO. 2 FLOODWAY WATER SURFACE ELEVATION STATION WIDTH SECTION MEAN WITH WITHOUT DIFFERENCE AREA VELOCITY FLOODWAY FLOODWAY 2.010 630. 2891. 1.4 132.1 132.1 .0 2.410 384. 1592. 2.6 133.7 133.7 .0 2.640 139. 1187. 3.5 135.2 135.2 .0 2.670 54. 436. 9.6 135.2 135.2 .0 2.680 194. 949. 4.3 136.8 136.8 .0 2.690 195. 1006. 4.1 137.1 137.1 .0 2.700 394. 1417. 2.9 137.3 137.3 .0 2.730 420. 2181. 1.9 137.7 137.7 .0 2.800 460. 2555. 1.6 138.0 138.0 .0 3.140 345. 1710. 2.4 139.1 139.1 .0 3.340 625. 2883. 1.4 140.1 140.1 .0 PROJECT MEETING BONITA ROAD IMPROVEMENTS 7:00 PM TIGARD CITY HALL - TOWN HALL TUESDAY, MARCH 21st This summer Bonita Road will be under construction. We propose to widen the existing roadway and bridge to 3 lanes, as it is west of the Fanno Creek bridge, and construct sidewalks. We also propose to add a right turn lane at the 72nd Avenue intersection. The section of road from the railroad tracks to the bridge will not be improved at this time. We are working with the two railroads to eliminate the difference in grade between the two tracks. Whether or not we succed in our negotiations to improve this crossing, we will improve this section, but most likely not until 1997. Funding has been approved for improving all of Bonita Road from west of the bridge to 72nd Avenue. If you have any further questions about the project or would like to review the plans, please plan on attending this informal meeting. Sin•-rely, C,f, io 7 ri d 3/05--- 0,4 7„ -"' Gary .n, Sr. P 41 -ct Engineer d/73m4t/'l evn.cl 7'- ..yo ga\bon-proj.mtg 1.//44) IL COLUMBIA SUNDAY SCHOOL WASHINGTON COUNTY BY JOHN E MOUNT FACILITIES MANAGMENT — ADMIN PO BOX 234 150 NE FIRST AVE ROOM B-7 dPORTLAND OR 97219 HILLSBORO OR 97123 CLARENE & MARY MCGARR CLARENCE CARLSON ET AL % PUGET DIE CASTING CO % PUGET CORP OF WASHINGTON 7440 SW BONITA ROAD 7440 SW BONITA ROAD PORTLAND OR 97224 PORTLAND OR 97224 BONITA HOLDINGS, INC DALE DENSON 4252 MUSQUEAM DRIVE BY COLLEGE PLACE ASSOC VANCOUVER BC CANADA V6N PO BOX 389 PALO ALTO CA 94302 MARCIENE TERRACE ASSOCIATES MILTON 0 BROWN BY COLLEGE PLACE ASSOC 301 NW MURRAY ROAD PO BOX 389 PORTLAND OR 94302 PALO ALTO CA 94302 DO NOT MAIL CITY OF TIGARD 13125 SW HALL BLVD BONITA.ML TIGARD OR 97223 MID—STATE INDUSTRIAL SERVICE, INC. 9398 SW TIGARD AVENUE TIGARD OR 97223 I. O F p, - ' � ' JOINT � , I � 1I �.' . i.1-�-=vi US Arm y Cor ps PERMIT APP LICATION FORM of Engineers THIS APPLICATION WILL MEET THE REQUIREMENTS OF BOTH AGENCIES \• •-•.ti �.%' Portland District , - / a 5 9_ AGENCIES WILL ASSIGN NUMBERS Corps Action ID Number Oregon Division of State Lands Number SEND ONE SIGNED COPY OF YOUR APPLICATION TO EACH AGENCY District Engineer State of Oregon ATTN: CENPP-PE-RP Division of State Lands P 0 Box 2946 775 Summer Street NE Portland, OR 97208-2946 Salem OR 97310 503/326-7730 503/378-3805 I Applicant Name City of Tigard business phone# (503) 639-4171 and Address Attention: Randy Wooley, City Engineer home phone# 13125 S.W. Hall Blvd. Tigard, OR 97223 FAX# (503) 684-7297 O Co-Applicant Gary Alfson, Senior Project Engineer business phone# (503) 639-4171 Authorized Agent 13125 S.W. Hall Blvd. O Contractor home phone# Name and Address Tigard, OR 97223 FAX# (503) 684-7297 Property Owner business phone # or different than applicant) Name and Address home phone# FAX# CD PROJECT LOCATION Street, Road or other descriptive location Legal Description Bonita Road over Fanno Creek Quarter Section Township Range In or Near(City or Town) County Tax Map# Tax Lot# Tigard Washington ' Waterway River Mile Latitude Longitude 1 Fanno Creek 2.69 Is consent to enter property granted to the Corps and the Division of State Lands? 0 Yes 0 No 03 PROPOSED PROJECT INFORMATION Activity Type: ® Fill 3 Excavation(removal) © In-Water Structure 0 Maintain/Repair an Existing Structure Brief Description: Widening of Existing 32' wide concrete bridge to 60'-2" wide Fill will involve cubic yards annually and/or 45 cubic yarns for the total project 45 cubic yards in a wetland or below the ordinary high water or high tide line Fill will be ® Riprap 0 Rock 0 Gravel © Sand 0 Silt 0 Clay 0 Organics 0 Other Fill Impact Area is 0.02 Acres; 50 FT length; 20 FT width; 8' max. depth Removal will involve cubic yards annually and/or 20 cubic yards for the total project 20 cubic yarns below the ordinary high water or high tide line Removal will be 0 Riprap 0 Rock 0 Gravel 0 Sand Silt 0 Clay 0 Organics 0 Other Removal Impact Area is 0.01 Acres; 30 length; 20 width; 6' max. depth Estimated Start Date June 15, 1995 Estimated Completion Date Sept. 30, 1995 Will cny material, construction debris, runoff, etc. enter a wetland or waterway? 0 Yes 0 No If yes, describe the type of discharge and show the discharge location on the site plan. PROPOSED PROJECT PURPOSE & DESCRIPTION Project Purpose and Need: Project Description: How many project drawing sheets are included with this application? 3 + Vicinity Map NOTE: A complete application must include drawings and a location map submitted on separate 8'/2X 11 sheets. PROJECT IMPACTS AND ALTERNATIVES Describe alternative sites and project designs that were considered to avoid impacts to the waterway or wetland. Describe what measures you will use(before and after construction)to minimize impacts to the waterway or wetland. NOTE: If necessary, use additional sheets. © ADDITIONAL INFORMATION Adjoining Property Owners and Their Addresses and Phone Numbers Has the proposed activity or any related activity received the attention of the Corps of Engineers or the State of Oregon in the past, e.g., wetland delineation, violation, permit, lease request, etc.? 0 YES ® NO If yes, what identification number(s) were assigned by the respective agencies: Corps # • State of Oregon# • © ° ..ITY / COUNTY PLANNING DEPARTMENT i....JAVIT (to be completed by local planning official) 0 This project is not regulated by the focal comprehensive plan and zoning ordinance. ()This project has been reviewed and is consistent with the local comprehensive plan and zoning ordinance. ()This project has been reviewed and is not consistent with the local comprehensive plan and zoning ordinance. XiConsistency of this project with the local planning ordinance cannot be determined until the following local approval(s) are obtained: ()Conditional Use Approval Development Permit °Plan Amendment OZone Change 0 Other An application ha has not been made for local approvals checked above. 0.0.0-4.e sR Pt kro Kt=_IZ riZifr-Ci /Wh54/Agreg/Signature(of local planning of i ' I) Title City/County Date ® COASTAL ZONE CERTIFICATION If the proposed activity described in your permit application is within the Oregon coastal zone,the following certification is required before your application can be processed. A public notice will be issued with the certification statement which will be forwarded to the Oregon Department of Land Conservation and Development(DLCD) for its concurrence or objection. For additional infcrmation on the Oregon Coastal Zone Management Program, contact the department at 1175 Court Street NE, Salem, Oregon 97310 or coil 503-373-0050. CERTIFICATION STATEMENT I certify that,to the best of my knowledge and belief,the proposed activity descrih ad in this application complies with the approved Oregon Coastal Zone Management Program and will be completed in a manner consistent with the program. Print/Type Name Title Applicant Signature Dote OO SIGNATURE FOR JOINT APPLICATION (REQUIRED) Application is hereby made for the activities described herein. I certify that I am familiar with the information contained in the application, and, to the best of my knowledge and belief, this information is true,complete,and accurate. I further certify that I possess the authority inducing the necessary requisite property interests to undertake the proposed activities. I understand that the granting of other permits by local, county, state or federal agencies does not release me from the requirement of obtaining the permits requested before commencing the project. I understand that local permits may be required before the state removal-fill permit is issued. I understand that payment of the required state processing fee does not guarantee permit issuance. P'int/Tvpe Ncme (CoCpC/iCanf Title Applicant Signature (Cocppucenn Date I certify that I may act as the duly authorized cgent of the applicant. 4/4-g4CF7oAI -1/ P1v1e /f ieMV nriT pe Ncre lite 644 1.140, ,1 ..A.41 3/ 7(9 5"-- J,■ or¢ea A ® Date wr SUPPLEMENTAL WETLAND IMPACT INFORMATION* (FOR WETLAND FILLS ONLY) Site Conditions of impact area Impact area is 0 Ocean 0 Estuary 0 River 0 Lake 0 Stream 0 Freshwater WO=tland Note: Estuarian Resource Replacement is required by state law for projects involving intertidal or tidal m(:rsh alterations. A separate Wetlands Resource Compensation Plan may be appended to the application. Has a wetland delineation been completed for this site? 0 Yes 0 No If yes, by whom: Describe the existing Physical and biological character of the wetland/waterway site by area and type of resource (use separate sheets and photos, if necessary) Resource Replacement Mitigation Describe measures to be taken to replace unavoidably impacted wetland resources Because this information is not necessary for a complete application, you may submit this sheet and other environmental information after submitting your apps'^ation. 4. PROPOSED PROJECT PURPOSE & DESCRIPTION Project Purpose and Need: The purpose of this project is to .widen an existing three span bridge which carries Bonita Road over Fanno Creek. The existing bridge appears to be structurally adequate but is geometrically inadequate. The existing bridge does not meet current standards for lane and shoulder width and does not have adequate pedestrian sidewalks. The existing structure has one sidewalk on the south side of the bridge. The new bridge will improve traffic and pedestrian safety by providing adequate vehicular traffic lane width without a constriction at the bridge, shoulders separating the vehicular traffic lanes from the sidewalks, room for bicycle traffic on the shoulders, and adequate sidewalks on both sides of the bridge which will tie in to the existing and proposed sidewalks on the adjoining roadway. Project Description: The project consists of widening an existing three span bridge. The existing bridge is steel pile supported with cast in place concrete pile caps, sidewalks and curbs, and precast concrete panel deck with an asphalt cement concrete wearing surface. The widening will be accomplished by removing the existing railings, curbs, sidewalk, and asphalt roadway wearing surface and extending the existing structure to the north approximately 16' and to the south approximately 13'. Three new steel pipe piles will be added at each end of each existing pile bent, and three new steel pipe piles will be added at each end of each existing abutment. The new steel pipe piles will be the same outside diameter as the piles under the existing structure. New cast in place concrete pile caps and abutments will be tied in to both ends of the existing ones to extend the structure on each side. New precast concrete panels will be placed to span between the new pile caps and tied into the existing deck panels. New cast in place concrete sidewalks will be cast on each side of the widened structure. Tubular steel railings will be provided on each edge of the bridge. A cast in place concrete retaining wall will be located at the north edge of the bridge to retain the west approach fill. A new asphalt cement concrete wearing surface will be placed over the entire width of the widened bridge roadway. 5. PROJECT IMPACTS AND ALTERNATIVES Describe alternative sites and project designs that were considered to avoid impacts to the waterway or wetland. The existing bridge alignment is closely bounded to the Northwest, Southwest, and Southeast by existing development. Moving the structure would require extensive roadway reconstruction. Changing the horizontal alignment of the roadway and bridge would also require disturbing other sections of Fanno Creek and abandoning the existing structure. Changing the vertical alignment of the bridge would require abandoning the existing structure and the construction of an all new structure. Two railing concepts were considered for the bridge. The proposed alternative of a tubular steel railing was chosen over a concrete barrier because it presents a more open structure should floodwaters crest over the bridge (which is the case for the design 100 year flood). Various alternatives for supporting the utilities which are carried on the existing bridge were considered. An arrangement similar to the existing which allows the conduits and pipes to hang below the deck of the bridge and partially block the bridge opening was abandoned in favor of routing conduits through the proposed sidewalks. This removes impediments to flow through the bridge opening. Hydraulic analysis (HEC-2) comparing the proposed structure to the existing structure indicates that the proposed widening will not cause a rise in the stream profile during the design 100 year flood event provided that piling similar to those existing are used to extend the structure and that no new obstructions to flow are placed in the channel near the bridge opening. The proposed structure meets these requirements. Describe what measures you will use (before and after construction) to minimize impacts to the waterway or wetland. Construction will be scheduled so that in water work only takes place during the approved in-water window. Fill and the retaining wall footing will be protected with rip-rap to prevent scour. The use of a retaining wall at the northwest abutment of the bridge minimizes the amount of fill which might enter the channel. Reasonable precautions including installation of protective covering, silt screens, and hay bales will be taken to prevent erosion of fill and impacts to water quality during construction. Filled areas will be seeded after construction to prevent erosion after construction. 6. ADDITIONAL INFORMATION Adjoining Property Owners and Their Addresses and Phone Numbers. Numbers are keyed to the PLAN. O Bonita Holdings, Inc 4252 Musqueam Drive Vancouver, BC Canada ® Tigard, City of 13125 SW Hall Boulevard PO Box 23397 Tigard, Oregon 97223 (503) 639-4171 m McGarr, Clarence H. & Mary c/o Puget Die Casting Co 7440 SW Bonita Road Tigard, Oregon 97223 (503) 639-3139 O Marcienne Terrace Associates By College Place Assoc P.O. Box 389 Palo Alto, California 94302 O Washington County Facilities Management-Administration 150 N. First Avenue, Room B-7 Hillsboro, Oregon 97124 (503) 648-8661 ® Tigard, City of 13125 SW Hall Boulevard PO Box 23397 Tigard, Oregon 97223 (503) 639-4171 I 1 1 LOCATION m � CO �L v. AREA WASHINGTON MUL 'MAN COUNTY COON tiro 111111 VICINITY _ AREA 1 ti� / OREGON I I YAMHILL T COUNTY 1 — .-- _ 1 CLACKMAS 1 MARION COUNTY COUNTY J 1 d o " ` 1 Ot 3 s®U L Z u M I, PROJECT > <° SITE o , = Q LOCATIO\ VAP z J. u) 1/45-1) z -A .j k . ,,,, ,53 ,-, - 0 ) / G N { 1 <)P SW BONITA RD Q J 4 m Q ' L.J J Q C Q 1K 2 FS— c-D U > 0 Q N N cn _ N 0 ( ) Z N z Q Li. In PURPOSE: WIDENING OF EXISTING PROPOSED BRIDGE WIDENING CONCRETE BRIDGE IN: CITY OF TIGARD OVER: FANNO CREEK DATUM: NGVD 1929 VICINITY RIVER MI 2.69 COUNTY OF: WASHINGTON STATE OF: OREGON MAPAPPLICATION BY: CITY OF TIGARD �/1 SHEET 1 OF 4 DATE: 3/7/95 L I— • �` /A 'I \ 1\\ 1 U r \\r o,,\ 1 a°yy!!F .) `1 I t43 W< G JIB 3 0• W <W o \-o- \ I o' a // 4:, \ ,,IJW,V ItU _ J 1. \ II\1 -- ' _ _ # mac,a --,v --- ----4,1— — --1—(57--1 I =o� I I••I _ _ -I -1-' , O _ _ ILI ' ti= N IIIi 111I� ra °1\ \ 5%U<WPI t `� " o aW W US O Qv � � ,I.I) .I 1 / II I II ? 1411 err o —I/ 04 0 > I '� T Ind o / • 1 -4 I IIII Cr Iit-a Y_ _ oE1 91 I�p Z , \ ,o ill \' f / a. 1 '/ A �' I __, C U / m T______=-__, o s J 1 1 l y i ✓__/ J ; I W W Z ^ I {�,W co VI WU/ I 1 61 1 i.:NA U 1" °W +� W• �_ - — 1 1,1 �� 30N3.4 /, �s / / ! 1 Jt� / �z-� 0 H /I u3W II WO; 1 :; I I i2_ 111 _ - — x�<- j 11 N WW1 0 I , I/� I 1Avmovo! .0-.„ 11 37- 0 Iu 1 .1-,09 II ) / \ 1 1 I PURPOSE: WIDENING OF EXISTING PROPOSED BRIDGE WIDENING CONCRETE BRIDGE PLAN IN: CIT OF TIGARD K DATUM: NGVD 1929 ADJACENT PROPERTY OWNERS: CD RIVER 2 COUNTY OF: WASHINGTON N O BONITA HOLDINGS, INC. O MARCIENNE TERRACE ASSOC. STATE OF: OREGON 0 TIGARD, CITY OF s0 WASHINGTON COUNTY APPLICATION BY: CITY OF TIGARD O MCGARR, CLARENCE H & MARY O TIGARD, CITY OF SHEET 2 OF 4 DATE: 3/7/95 J of 'I of 097.£I '13 '0'd 1- — _ b 1N38 1 l I a U 6 1-Ln J -Li N n.(r,0 'L£l '13 '0d / £ 1N38 b r w I CO I— o F �i N O J Z O 0 W-j O> z.L.....„.....L 1 Q ' 0m z 9-1 C v a Qa < O w O i O o1 09'L£1 '13 'O'd ,,,J____= J Z 1N38 : / J W Z Y WZ a cc x a O 0 0 I w N z 0 n -1 Vl o Z 1-a l/1 0_ a ---"'W 0 d CC w� 09'M- '13 '9'd L R a°" L 1N38 3J - z 1- 0z c0'i m a~a 0} -m va- PURPOSE: WIDENING OF EXISTING PROPOSED BRIDGE WIDENING CONCRETE BRIDGE IN: CITY OF TIGARD DATUM: NGVD 1929 � r OVER: FANNO CREEK //TL.EVA TI®1'7V © RIVER MI 2.69 COUNTY OF: WASHINGTON STATE OF: OREGON APPLICATION BY: CITY OF TIGARD SHEET 3 OF 4 DATE: 3/7/95 1 •• I oc» > oc -i z ' • c c» K 7D o .. mcn Z m I• ?1 0 < m * o x6 o m (.0 0z r) m Z co O VARIES FROM 0" EAST END OF BRIDGE 0-r1 _ 60'-2" i TO 5 1/2" WEST END OF BRIDGE m X 1'-6" 6'-7" 44'-0" ROADWAY 6'-7" 1'-6' _ - -I NEW STEEL NEW C.I.P. CONC. CL WIDENED _ I Z RAILING SIDEWALK BRIDGE & REMOVE EXIST. ASPHALT O O NEW 1'-3" THICK PROFILE WEARING SURFACE. REPLACE in �� PROPOSED ( W/ NEW ASPHALT WEARING S N h NEW UTILITY PRECAST CONCRETE GRADE ROADWAY SURFACE OVER ENTIRE WIDTH l CONDUIT DECK PANEL (TYP) I EXIST ING OF WIDENED ROADWAY. _ (TYP) EXISTING POST BRIDGE 1" i j��• RAILING, CURB I I EXISTING POST - 11 Is 1 +4 AND SIDEWALK .- J �L 1'-5" RAILING AND CURB ..��. `an ■ 1so� 17. •• TO BE REMOVED •• TO BE REMOVED OA* L 1% ��• r^ �i • • • il�. il�Si _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ -� • • • • ..f....LI trl P���f I I TT- T-f- -T-f I I i 1, bI I EXISTING PILE I I I I I (EXISTING DECK I I EXISTING CAP TO REMAIN PANELS TO REMAIN KNEW C.I.P. CONC. y 12" & 24" I 11 I I III II I I I I I I PILE CAP WATER MAINS NEW C.I.P. CONC. REMOVE EXIST. BURIED BELOW I I PILE CAP I I I I I I UTILITY CONDUITS OINEW 12 3/4" 0.0. I I I I I & HANGERS II 'I .41-i LI PIPE PILE (TYP) Li Li L� l l� ... ` , Li EXIST. 12 3/4"0.D. PIPE PILE (TYP) 1.-6" 10'-0" 5'-O" _ _ 3'-6" 30'-0" 3 PILE SPA = 15'-0" 11--6" Ul D (n C7 O Z 6'-4 1 WIDENING = 12'-8" I EXISTING BRIDGE = 32'-0" I WIDENING = 15'-6" 2 -0 -10 < •• m v > c m 0 m r- _ z xiom --i fT1 =1 0 -P, > O ® m -< m TYPICAL SECTION - WIDENED BRIDGE = 71 o D o LOOKING WEST O " mz) z0 o z z co 0 4 a m 0 m O -1 70 1 co xl `z Scale in Feet 41. 75 my nG� o 01 _ � Mm D _1 zt.rm° g m oar o o 0 Z w z Z = C coo > Cn 0 0 L CITY OF TIGARD PRE-APPLICATION CONFERENCE NOTES NON-RESIDENTIAL DATE: i"-6/9 r 3, I l `5 APPLICANT: AGENT: Phone: Phone: PROPERTY LOCATION ADDRESS: TAX MAP & TAX LOT: NECESSARY APPLICATION(S) : `) E )Ft-tuG L4 /VD R COE i PROPOSAL DESCRIPTION: \ -1 E. C-->ts-P4 PJv)oK) COMPREHENSIVE PLAN DESIGNATION: ZONING DESIGNATION: ZONING DISTRICT DIMENSIONAL REQUIREMENTS Minimum lot size: sq. it/. Minimum lot width: -t. Setbacks: front- ft. side- ft. , rear- ft. garage- ft. corner-_ ft. from both streets . Maximum site coverage: o Minimum landscaped or natural vegetation area: o Maximum building height: ft. ADDITIONAL LOT DIMENSIONAL REQUIREMENTS Minimum lot frontage: 25 feet less lot is created through the minor land partition process. Lots reared as part of a partition must have a minimum of 15 feet o frontage or have a minimum 15 foot wide access easement. Maximum lot de.pth to width ratio of 2.5 to 1. SPECIAL SETBACKS Streets: ft. from centerline of Established areas: ft. from Lower intensity zones: ft. , along the site' s boundary Page 1 • SPECIAL BUILDING HEIGHT PROVISIONS Building Height Exceptions (Code Se ion 18.98.020) : Buildings located in a non-residential zone may be bu' t to a height of 75 feet provided: 1. A maximum FAR (bu' ding floor area to site area ratio) of 1.5 to 1 will exist; 2. All actual building setbacks will be at least 1/2 the building's, height; and 3 . The structure will not abut a residential zone district. PARKING AND ACCESS Required parking for this a of use: Secondary use, equired parking: 25t of required spaces may be designated c pact-only spaces. Standard parking space dimensions : 9 ft. 18 ft. Compact parking space dimensions: 8.5 ft X 15 ft. Disabled person parking: All parking areas providing in excess of five required automobile parking spaces shall provide appropriately located and designated disabled person parking spaces. The minimum number of disabled person parking spaces to be provided and parking space size are mandated by the Oregon Revised Statutes and Americans with Disabilities Act (see handout) . A handicapped parking space symbol shall be painted on the parking space surface and an appropriate sign shall be provided. Bicycle racks are require ' for civic uses, non-residential uses, commercial uses, and indus ial uses providing 15 or more automobile parking spaces. Bicycle arking must be provided at a ratio of one bicycle rack space per 15 auto parking spaces. Bicycle racks shall be located in areas protected from automobile traffic. The Planning Division can provide specifications for approved bicycle rack types. All driveways and pa ing areas, except for some fleet storge parking areas, must be paved Drive-in use queui g areas: Minimum number of accesses : Minimum access width: 24 ft. Maximum access idth: 40 ft. Pedestrian ac ess must be provided between building entrances and parking areas, outd r common areas, and public sidewalks and streets. Parking area landscaping and screening: Required. See Landscaping section below. For detailed information on design requirements for parking areas and accesses, see Community Development Code Chapters 18.106 and 18.108. Page 2 CLEAR VISION AREA The City requires that clear vision be maintained between three and eight feet above grade at road/driveway, road/railroad, and road/road intersections in specified clea ision areas. The size of the required clear vision area depend upon the abutting street's functional classification. No buil ' gs, signs, trees or other visual obstructions are allowed between 3 d 8 feet above grade in these areas. LANDSCAPING Street trees are required for all developments ronting on a public or private street or a driveway more than 100 f t in length. Street trees must be placed either within the public ight-of-way or on private property within six feet of the right-of- y boundary. Street trees must have a minimum caliper of two inches four feet above grade. Street trees should be spaced 20 to 40 feet apart depending on mature tree size. Further information on regulations affecting street trees and a list of recommended street trees may be tained from the Planning Division. A minimum of one tree per even parking spaces must be planted in and around parking areas in der to provide a canopy effect. Landscaped screening of parking a as from views from public rights-of-way must be provided. BUFFERING AND SCREENING In order to increase privacy and to red e or eliminate adverse noise or visual impacts between adjacent developments, especially between different land uses, the City requires landsc- •ed buffer areas along certain site perimeters. Required buffer areas =re described by the Code in terms of width. Buffer areas must be occupied by a mixture of deciduous and evergreen trees and shrubs. S'te obscuring screens or fences are also required in some cases, and .ften are advisable even if not required. Required buffer areas may only be occupied by vegetation, fences, utilities, and sidewalks. Additional information •n required buffer area materials and sizes may be found in Code Chapte 18.100. Required buffer w' iths applicable to your proposal area: ft. along orth boundary ft. along east boundary ft. alone south boundary ft. along west boundary In addition sight obscuring screening is required along Page 3 SIGNS Permits must be obtained before erecting an ign in the City of Tigard. A "Guidelines for Sign Permits" han• is available upon request. Additional sign area or height be • i Code standards may be permitted if the sign proposal is reviewed - part of a development application. SENSITIVE LANDS 1- ICC)h 1 ]4• 'b.R9 ] n Other Agency Permits: ADDITIONAL CONCERNS OR COMMENTS REVIEW PROCEDURES Staff review. ublic hearing before the Land Use Hearings Officer. Public hearing before the Planning Commission. Applications must be accepted by a Planning Division staff member at the Community Development Department counter at City Hall. Applications submitted by mail or dropped off at the counter without Planning Division acceptance may be returned. Applications submitted after 4 PM on Thursday will be batched for processing with the following week' s applications for processing. No applications will be accepted after 4 :30 PM. Maps submitted with an application shall be folded in advance to 8 .5 by 11 inches. One 8.5 inch by 11 inch map of a proposed project should be submitted for attachment to the staff report or administrative decision. The Planning Division and Engineering Division will do a preliminary review of the application and will determine whether an application is complete within 10 days of submittal. Staff will notify an applicant if additional information or copies of the submitted materials are needed. The administrative decision/public hearing typically will occur approximately days after an application is accepted as complete by the Planning Division. Applications involving difficult issues or requiring review by other jurisdictions may take additional time to Page 4 review. Written decisions are issued within 10 days of public hearings. A 10 day appeal period follows all decisions. An appeal on this matter would be heard by the c-k C(1vt,)C.1 A basic flow diagram illustrating the review process is available from the Planning Division. '£he pre-application conference' anc " the 'n.ate's' of` the "conference are intended to inform the prospective applicant of the primary Community Development Code requirements applicable to development of a particular site and to allow the staff and prospective applicant to discuss the opportunities and constraints affecting development of the site. The conference and notes cannot cover all Code requirements and aspects of good site planning that should apply to the development of your site plan, failure of the staff to provide any information required by the Code shall not constitute a waiver of the applicable standards or requirements . it is recommended that a prospective applicant either obtain and read the Community Development Code or aakc a y c, xesti.©ns of City staff relative to Qade x.equirenients -prior..:;tca subm :# <<: }? .a,capkon; Another pre-application conference is required if an application is to be submitted more than six months after this pre-application conference, unless is deemed unnecessary by the Planning Division. PREPARED BY: (.k) 'J\A!ZO'1 44 PLANNING DIVISION Page 5 PUBLIC FACILITIES The purpose of the pre-application conference is to: (i) identify applicable Comprehensive Plan policies and ordinance provisions; (ii) to provide City staff an opportunity to comment on specific concerns; and (iii) to review the application review process with the applicant including identifying who will be the final decision maker for the application. The extent of public improvements and dedications to be required of the applicant will be recommended by City Engineering Department staff and approved by the appropriate authority. There will be no final recommendation to the decision maker by City staff until all commenting agencies, City staff and the public have had an opportunity to review and comment on the application. The following comments are a projection of public improvement related requirements that may be required as a condition of development approval for your project. Unless noted otherwise, the primary contact for questions related to public facility issues is 62,1446441A---- E gineering Department, 639-4171 Right-of-way dedication: The City of Tigard requires that land area be dedicated to the public to increase abutting public rights-of-way to the ultimate functional street classification rights-of-way width specified by the Community Development Code. ' Approval of a development application for this site will re ire 4(1 dedication of right-of-way for 1. to feet from centerline. 2 . to feet from centerline. Street improvements: G!Q �2 f Y/%C gC/9 ppom2 d-'e/effi 6r mfia, 1. street improvements will be necessary along Needed street improvements will include feet of pavement from centerline, curb and gutters, storm sewers, a five-foot wide sidewalk, necessary street signs, streetlights, and a two year streetlighting fee. 2 . street improvements will be necessary along Needed street improvements will include feet of pavement from centerline, curb and gutters, storm sewers, a five-foot wide sidewalk, necessary street signs, streetlights, and a two year streetlighting fee. Page 6 In some cases where street improvements or other necessary public improvements are not currently practical, the street improvements may be deferred. In these cases, as a condition of development approval, the property owner(s) must execute a non-remonstrance agreement which waives the property owner' s right to remonstrate against the formation of a local improvement district formed to improve 1. n Pedestrianways/bikeways: Sanitary Sewers: The closest sanitary sewer to this property is an inch line located . The proposed development must be connected to a sanitary sewer. It is the developer' s responsibility to extend the sewer along the proposed development site' s Water Supply: The Tigard Water District (Phone: 639-1554) or the Tualatin Valley Water District (Phone: 642-1511) provides public water service in the area of this site. The appropriate Water District should be contacted for information regarding water supply for your proposed development. Fire Protection: Tualatin Valley Fire and Rescue District (Contact: Gene Birchill, 526-2469) provides fire protection services within the City of Tigard. The District should be contacted for information regarding the adequacy of circulation systems, the need for fire hydrants, or other questions related to fire protection. Other Agency Permits: TRAFFIC IMPACT FEES In 1990, Washington County adopted a county-wide Traffic Impact Fee (TIF) ordinance This action placed into effect an increased street development fee on all new development in Washington County. The City of Tigard has adopted the county's program. The City Traffic Impact Fee program will collect fees from new development based on the development' s projected impact on the transportation system. Developing properties will be required to pay based on the number of trips they are projected to generate. The TIF is calculated based on type of use, size of project, and a general use based fee category. The TIF shall be calculated at time of building permit issuance. In limited circumstances, payment of the TIF may be allowed to be deferred until issuance of occupancy permit. Deferral of payment until occupancy is permissible only when the TIF is greater than $5, 000.00. Page 7 STORMWATER QUALITY FEES/FACILITIES The Unified Sewerage Agency has established and the City has agreed to enforce, Resolution No. 90-43, Surface Water Management Regulations, requiring the construction of on-site water quality facilities or fees in lieu of their construction. The resolution requires that a fee and/or construction of a water quality facility be built. The fee is based on the amount of impervious surface; for every 2640 square feet or portion thereof, the fee shall be $280. The City of Tigard determines if a fee or facility shall be built. Necessary storm sewer improvements: STREET OPENING PERMIT No work within a public right-of-way shall commence until the applicant has obtained a street opening permit from the Engineering Department. FINISHED FLOOR ELEVATIONS On all projects that require a grading plan the applicant shall submit with the grading plan a typical floor plan for each lot which shall have the elevations of four corners of that plan along with elevations at the corner of each lot. PHONE: 639-4171 jo:preapnon Page 8 Staff (AID Date cf.7- 5 VS- CITY OF TIGARD COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT APPLICATION CHECKLIST The items on the checklist below are required for the successful completion of your application submission requirements . This checklist identifies what is required to be submitted with your application. This sheet MUST be brought and submitted with all other materials at the time you submit your application. See your application for further explanation of these items or call Planning at 639-4171 . ITEMS TO BE BASIC MATERIALS INCLUDED: A) Application form (1 copy) [4°f- B) Owner' s signature/written authorization [e C) Title transfer instrument [ ] D) Assessor' s map [s]- E) Plot or site plan F) Applicant' s statement ( _ • - - •• _ . ' L,:.. nt0 f of [ (H) Filing fee ($ ) [ ] SPECIFIC MATERIALS A) Site Information showing (No. of copies /C' ) : [ ] 1) Vicinity Map C-] 2) Site size & dimensions [-]" 3) Contour lines (2 ft at 0-10% or 5 ft for grades > 10%) [-T- 4) Drainage patterns, courses, and ponds [-a' 5) Locations of natural hazard areas including: a) Floodplain areas [ ] b) Slopes in excess of 25% [ ] c) Unstable ground [ ] d) Areas with high seasonal water table [ ] e) Areas with severe soil erosion potential [ ] f) Areas having severely weak foundation soils [ ] 6) Location of resource areas as shown on the Comprehensive Map inventory including: a) Wildlife habitats [ ] b) Wetlands [ ] 7) Other site features : a) Rock outcroppings [ ] b) Trees with 6" + caliper measured 4 feet from ground level [ ] 8) Location of existing structures and their uses [ ] 9) Location and type of on and off-site noise sources [ ] 10) Location of existing utilities and easements [ ] 11) Location of existing dedicated right-of-ways C ] B) Site Development Plan showing (No. of copies /0 ) : [ ] 1) The proposed site and surrounding properties [ ] 2) Contour line intervals [ ] 3) The location, dimensions and names of all : a) Existing & platted streets & other public ways and easements on the site and on adjoining [ ] properties APPLICATION CHECKLIST - Page 1 Proposed streets or other pu. .c ways & easements on the site. [ ] c) Alternative routes of dead end or proposed streets that require future extension [ ] 4) The location and dimension of: a) Entrances and exits on the site [ ] b) Parking and circulation areas [ ] c) Loading and services areas [ ] d) Pedestrian and bicycle circulation [ ] e) Outdoor common areas, [ ] f) Above ground utilities [ ] 5) The location, dimensions & setback distances of all: a) Existing permanent structures, improvements, utilities and easements which are located on the site and on adjacent property within 25 feet of the site [ ] b) Proposed structures, improvements, utilities and easements on the site [ ] 6) Storm drainage facilities and analysis of downstream conditions [ ] 7) Sanitary sewer facilities [ ] 8) The location of areas to be landscaped [ ] 9) The location and type of outdoor lighting considering crime prevention techniques [ ] 10) The location of mailboxes C ] 11) The location of all structures and their orientation [ ] 12) Existing or proposed sewer reimbursement agreements [ ] C) Grading Plan (No. of copies / 0 ) [ ] The site development plan shall include a grading plan at the same scale as the site analysis drawings and shall contain the following information: 1) The location and extent to which grading will take place indicating general contour lines, slope ratios and soil stabilization proposals, and time of year it is proposed to be done. [ ] 2) A statement from a registered engineer supported by data factual substantiating: a) Subsurface exploration and geotechnical engineering report [ ] b) The validity of sanitary sewer and storm drainage service proposals [ ] c) That all problems will be mitigated and how they will be mitigated [ ] D) Architectur. l Drawin's (No. of copies ) : [ ] The site dev-lopment plan proposal shall include: 1) Floor p ans indicating the square footage of all structu es proposed for use on—site; and [ ] 2) Typical -levation drawings of each structure. [ ] E) Landscape Plan No. of copies ) : C ] The landscape p .n shall be drawn at the same scale of the site analysis pl. or a larger scale if necessary and shall indicate: 1) Description o' the irrigation system where applicable [ ] 2) Location and h• 'ght of fences, buffers and screenings [ ] APPLICATION CHECKLIST — Page 2 3) L .ation of terraces, decks, shel, s, play areas and common open spaces [ ] 4) Location, type, size an. species of existing and proposed plant materi. s . [ ] The landscape plan shall i elude a narrative which addresses : 1) Soil conditions . C ] 2) Erosion control mea res that will be used . [ ] F) Sign Drawings Sign drawings shall be submitted in accordance with Chapter 18 . 114 of the Code as 'art of Site Development Review or prior to obtaining a Building Permit to construct the sign. [ ] G) Traffic •eneration e,timate C ] H) Preliminary partition or lot line adjustment map showing (No. of Copies ) : 1) The owner of the subject parcel [ 3 2) The owner' s authorized agent [ 3 3) The map scale,; (20,50, 100 or 200 feet=1), inch north arrow and date [ 3 4) Description o parcel location and boundaries [ 3 5) Location, wid h and names of streets, easements and other public ways within and adjacent to the parcel [ ] 6) Location of 11 permanent buildings on and within 25 feet of 11 property lines [ 3 7) Location and width of all water courses [ 3 8) Location of ny trees with 6" or greater caliper at 4 feet abov ground level [ ] 9) All slopes eater than 25% [ 3 10) Location of existing utilities and utility easements [ ] 11) For major 1 nd partition which creates a public street: a) The pr posed right—of—way location and width [ 3 b) A scaled cross—section of the proposed street plus any reserve strip [ 3 12) Any applicable deed restrictions [ ] 13) Evidence that land partition will not preclude efficient future land division where applicable [ 3 I) Subdivision Preliminary Plat Map and data showing(No. of Copies ) : 1) Scale equaling 30,50, 100 or 200 feet to the inch and limited to one phase per sheet [ ] 2) The propos d name of the subdivision [ ] 3) Vicinity m p showing property' s relationship to arterial a d collector streets C ] 4) Names, addr sses and telephone numbers of the owner developer, 'engineer, surveyer, designer, as applicable[ ] 5) Date of appl' cation [ ] 6) Boundary lin s of tract to be subdivided [ ] 7) Names of adj cent subdivision or names of recorded owners of ad 'oining parcels of unsubdivided land [ ] 8) Contour lines elated to a City—established bench- mark at 2—foo ' intervals for 0-10% grades greater than 10% C ] APPLICATION CHECKLIST — Page 3 9) purpose, location, type and s. of all of the following (within and adjacent to a proposed subdivision) : [ ] a) Public and private right—of ays and easements [ ] b) Public and private sanitar and storm sewer lines [ ] c) Domestic water mains inc ding fire hydrants [ ] d) Major power telephone tr nsmission lines (50,000 volts or greater) [ ] e) Watercourses [ ] f) Deed reservations for parks, open space, pathways and other land encu/iibrances [ ] 10) Approximate plan and pro iles of proposed sanitary and storm sewers with grad s and pipe sizes indicated [ ] 11) Plan of the proposed w er distribution system, showing pipe sizes an, the location of valves and fire hydrants . [ ] 12) Approximate centerline profiles showing the finished grade of all street including street extensions for a reasonable distant beyond the limits of the proposed subdivision. [ ] 13) Scaled cross sectio s of proposed street right—of—way; [ ] 14) The location of all areas subject to inundation or storm water overflow [ ] 15) Location, width and direction of flow of all water- courses and drainage ways [ 3 16) The proposed lot configurations, approximate lot dimensions and lot numbers . Where losts are to be used for purposes other than residential, it shall be indicated upon such lots [ ] 17) The location of 'all trees with a diameter 6 inches or greater measur d at 4 feet above ground level, and the location o proposed tree plantings, if any [ ] 18) The existing u es of the property, including the location of a 1 structures and the present uses of the structure , and a statement of which structures are to remain after platting [ ] 19) Supplemental i formation including: a) Proposed ideed restrictions (if any) [ ] b) Proof of property ownership [ ] c) A proposed plan for provision of subdivision improverhents [ ] 20) Existing natural features including rock out- croppings, wgtlands and marsh areas. [ ] 21) If any of the foregoing information cannot practicably be shown on the preliminary plat, it shall be incorporated into a narrative and submitted with the application. [ ] J) Other Information I [ ] solar Ikccc�:> tcuia. ,cos (2362P/0028P) APPLICATION CHECKLIST — Page 4 REQUEST FOR COMMENTS NOTIFICATION LIST FOR ALL APPLICATIONS c4NEN MtVA 5 ., .:,..,,v..iarcf8 }:: r 7r... 1 :}}: f..,.,... —crr Area: (N) (; 1A1) " Placed for review In Library CR Book ' _CPO NO. -:v::}i:iii. . i'..::::::::::::v:L lull:i::::.:::Ikii............................... ..... . ..... .::-.n. ..• f :::.w::!<4i}})i)}}}}i;v::vv.iY.-:':::::iiii'fi.:, ./.��� : ;:::..:.�.;: .... -• . ,;,{:.;:.i.:i•}:•h}'••:{:-rr::::}:.:. . ::::.:::::::::.:}i}ii:::..::.:::::::.::: :::: AiF1:7:�:7+FT.'� {•,..•.i''•'�...'•,�M�:''•::::::.;::i:::�::.}:�» :;•:` ;�:�i:�:%�ir:�i:�i::i:;:::i:�i::::;�::::;::: ::::?: :�:%������'�>;:�;:�;:�;:�;::;:�;:�:�;:�;:�:�:�;:�;O o:]ftgaaM:::cWag:�;:-i;:�;:�MMMMM-;::MWg<.:;:Mgg= M B, –uildiig Official/Dave Scott Police/Kelly Jennings d Operatcns/John Acker —City Recorder/Cathy Wheatleyineering/Michael Anderson Permits Facilitator/Jerree Gaynor dvanced Planning/Carol Landsman Water Department/Michael Miller :{- .. ..,...r.::{:{.ii}}}ii:4:::n,-:::::::::nv:::.i}:.}}}}}}}i}-v:::•::::n.::::::::::::::::::::::r iiii}::}r•:}n..... *� .................. +h.. . .x..:..::,.+ ...............................{•::n•.v:::::::::::::w::::::...:.n........v ......, � .. �. r'�?v.•w.v.................r ......:.:•.+w-ff..::iii:.::: ::::::::::: :::::i:::-:eg:-:::::::::: :::: —Rre District �ed Sewerage Agency _Tualatin Valley Water District (pick-up box) SWM Program/Lee Walker PO Box 745 155 N. First Street Beaverton,OR 97075 Hillsboro,OR 97124 +? /fi%•is�i:��i�ii:•}}:{•}}}:2::{•}:•}}:•::::v::::}:........'.. ..:v:.`i}:.v: ../.v...i'r:i:.+::?'7i {v{:::v.?.:.:i}N'•v .......,vv:f-�• :,•:::::::::::::::::::::w:.;...................................................... ......... ............................................. .......... ,- ............. .+ff�:::{{•}j.,v,... .. •. :}•:'fr: f}+:4}}}r.:f:}}: .............r..+:{j r�.............................. ......................... . .... .. ...... ................................................... .,..-.:.:............. .................... .. rFv:.v:};:}?..�jy'4�;. ,, ... ?•.T.::vw::. Washington Co.Land Use&Transportation _Boundary Commission _METRO-GREENSPACES PROGRAM 150 N. First Avenue 800 NE Oregon St.#16,Suite 540 Mel Huie (CPA's/ZOA's) Hillsboro,OR 97124 Portland,OR 97232-2109 600 NE Grand Avenue Portland,OR 97232-2736 _Brent Curtis(CPA's) _State Highway Division _Jim lice(IGA'S) Sam Hunaidi _ODOT/Region 1 _Mike Borreson(Engineer) PO Box 25412 Laurie Nicholson/Transportation Planning _Scott King(CPA's) Portland,OR 97225-0412 123 N.W. Flanders Tom Harry(Current Planning App's) Portion d,OR 97209-4307 Lynn Bailey(Current Planning App's) _Oregon DLCD(CPA's/ZOA's) 1 175 Court Street.N.E. _Other _City of Beaverton Salem,OR 97310-0590 Jim Hendryx-Principal Planner _City of Portland PO Box 4755 City of Durham Planning Director Beaverton,OR 97076 City Manager 1120 SW 5th PO Box 23483-3483 Portland,OR 97204 City of King City Tigard.OR 97281 City Manager _City of Lake Oswego 15300 SW 116th _City of Tualatin City Manager King City,OR 97224 PO Box 369 PO Box 369 Tualatin,OR 97062 Lake Oswego,OR 97(134 SPECIAL*G NCIES —General Telephone —Portland General Electric —Columbia Cable Engineering Office Brian Moore Craig Eyestone PO Box 23416 14655 SW Old Scholls Ferry Road 14200 SW Brigadoon Court Tigard,OR 97281-3416 Beaverton,OR 97007 Beaverton,OR 97005 —NW Natural Gas —Metro Area Communications/Jason Hewitt _Tri-Met Transit Dev. Scott Palmer Twin Oaks Technology Center Kum Knox 220 NW Second Avenue 1815 NW 169th Place 5-6020 710 NE Holladay Street Portland,OR 97209-3991 Beaverton,OR 97006-4886 Portland,OR 97232 _TCI Cablevision of Oregon _US West Linda Peterson Pete Nelson 3500 SW Bond Street 421 SW Oak Street Portland,OR 97201 Portland,OR 97204 STATE ..;.., ::``: C� :.? hti .......... .......•}.�ri•}}:4i::.::.;:.i?i:{-iii}:{v:.v:.:..::::.:.:.:: . -. :: fFr {f _Aeronautics Division(ODOT) �i)ivision of State Lands _US Postal Service _Commerce Dept. -M.H.Park —Fish&Wildlife Randy Hammock,Growth Coordinator —PUC —DOGAMI Cedar Mill Station _Dept.of Environ. Quality Portland,OR 97229-9998 r:::::::: mg:::::::::::::..wm-mnmnemmmmmumm ::. FEDERAL..AGENCIES . --... G-Corps. of Engineers Other — OTHER _Southern Pacific Transportation Company Duane M. Forney,PLS-Project Engineer 800 NW 6th Avenue,R.324,Union Station Portland,OR 97209 h kwpmpoMVno,onc mil LAND USE NOTiFiCATION PROCESS Preapplication meeting Applicant reviews proposal with staff Staff explains code requirements and notification requirements for the following applications: Comprehensive Plan Amendments Zone Changes Subdivisions Sensitive Lands Conditional Uses Site Development Review Applicant makes arrangements for neighborhood meeting Applicant's choice of date (using staff guidelines) Schedules facility Applicant prepares letter regarding meeting Briefly describes development, location and sets date, time and place for meeting. (Meeting date within 2 - 4 weeks of date letter sent). (Provide 2 weeks minimum notice) Applicant mails letter of meeting Applicant gets list of affected property owners from available sources. Applicant gets list of CIT contacts from city. Applicant prepares affidavit of mailing on form provided at preapplication meeting. Applicant posts site on same day letter of meeting is mailed. Must be posted at location viewable from a public-right-of-way. Sign shall state that site may be under consideration for a land use application and a phone number where the applicant can be reached for additional information. Applicant prepares affidavit of posting on form provided at preapplication meeting. Meeting held Applicant presents proposal, including city requirements, answers questions. Makes note of names and addresses of individuals who speak and their comments. Applicant modifies proposal if desired. Applicant submits proposal to city for review including: A copy of letter sent regarding meeting with a mailing list and affidavit of mailing. A copy of the sign-up sheet(s) from meeting(s) held with interested citizens on the proposal. bkm/ci trio t AFFIDAVIT OF MAILING STATE OF OREGON ) ) SS CITY OF TIGARD I, , being duly sworn, depose and say that on , 19 , I caused to have mailed to each of the persons on the attached list a notice of a meeting to discuss a proposed development at , a copy of which notice so mailed is attached hereto and made a part of hereof. I further state that said notices were enclosed in envelopes plainly addressed to said persons and were deposited on the date indicated above in the United States Post Office at , with postage prepaid thereon. Signature Subscribed and sworn to before me this day of , 19 Notary Public My Commission Expires: h:\login\jo\affmail.cit Date of Mailing NAME AND ADDRESS OF PROPERTY } CIT Representative Name OWNER WITHIN 250 FEET, OR IF } CIT Number RESIDENT, USE "RESIDENT' AND } CIT Representative Address PROPERTY ADDRESS } CIT City, State, Zip RE: Application Name Dear Interested Party: (1/my company name) (am/is) the (owner/representing the owner) of the property located at (address if available or general description of location and tax map and lot). (1/we) are considering proposing a (describe proposal, e.g., conditional use, subdivision, etc.) at this location. Prior to applying to the City of Tigard for the necessary permits, I would like to discuss the proposal in more detail with the surrounding property owners and residents. You are invited to attend a meeting on: (day, month, date, year) (Location) (Address) (Time ... should be an evening meeting and located somewhere in the CIT, as close to the neighborhood as possible) Please notice this will be an informational meeting on preliminary plans. These plans may be altered prior to the submittal of the application to the City. I look forward to more specifically discussing the proposal with you. Please call me at (phone number where you can be reached) if you have any questions. Sincerely, (Name) bkm,invite.cit Name of applicant Subject Property: Tax Map and Lot # Address or General Location AFFIDAVIT OF POSTING NOTICE I, , do affirm that I am (represent) the party Initiating Interest in a proposed affecting the land located at and did on the day of , 19 personally post notice indicating that the site may be proposed for a application, and the time, date and place of a neighborhood meeting to discuss the proposal. The sign was posted at (state location on property) This day of , 19 Signature Subscribed and sworn to, affirmed, before me this day of , 19 Notary Public for the State of Oregon My Commission Expires: WITHIN SEVEN (7) CALENDAR DAYS OF THE SIGN POSTING, RETURN THIS AFFIDAVIT TO: City of Tigard Planning Division 13125 SW Hall Blvd. Tigard, OR 97223 login\jo\postnot.cit MEMORANDUM CITY OF TIGARD, OREGON TO: Dick Bewersdorff, Senior Planner FROM: Liz Newton, Community Involvement Coordinator DATE: August 1, 1994 (updated list as of 8/1/94) SUBJECT: EAST CIT Area Land Use Notification Effective immediately, please ask your staff to have applicants with proposals in the EAST CIT notify the following people: Mary Swintek 9915 SW Frewing #23 Tigard, OR 97223 Craig Hopkins 7430 SW Varns Tigard, OR 97223 Mark F. Mahon 11310 SW 91st Court Tigard, OR 97223 Joel Stevens 9660 SW Ventura Court Tigard, OR 97223 Pat Wyden 8122 SW Spruce Tigard, OR 97223 PUBLIC HEAI. >ING NOTICE NOTICE IS HEREBY GIVEN THAT THE TIGARD HEARINGS OFFICER, AT A MEETING ON MONDAY, MAY 8. 1995 AT 7:00 PM, °.M. IN THE TOWN HALL OF THE TIGARD CIVIC CENTER, CITY OF TIGARD 13125 SW HALL BOULEVARD, TIGARD, OREGON 97223 WILL CONSIDER THE FOLLOWING APPLICATION: FILE NO: SENSITIVE LANDS REVIEW (SLR) 95-0005 FILE TITLE: BONITA BRIDGE WIDENING APPLICANT: CITY OF TIGARD OWNER: Same 13125 SW Hall Boulevard Tigard, OR 97223 REQUEST: A request for Sensitive Lands Review approval to allow the widening of a bridge over Fanno Creek from 30 feet to 60 feet, located on SW Bonita Road. LOCATION: SW Bonita Road crossing of Fanno Creek. APPLICABLE REVIEW Community Development Code Sections 18.84. CRITERIA: ZONE: I-L (Light Industrial). The Light Industrial zoning allows public support facilities, building maintenance services, manufacturing of finished products, packaging and processing, wholesale, storage, and distribution, among other uses. THE PUBLIC HEARING ON THIS MATTER WILL BE CONDUCTED IN ACCORDANCE WITH THE RULES OF CHAPTER 18.32 OF THE COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT CODE AND RULES OF PROCEDURE ADOPTED BY THE TIGARD CITY COUNCIL AND AVAILABLE AT CITY HALL, OR RULES OF PROCEDURE SET FORTH IN CHAPTER 18.30. ASSISTIVE LISTENING DEVICES ARE AVAILABLE FOR PERSONS WITH IMPAIRED HEARING. THE CITY WILL ALSO ENDEAVOR TO ARRANGE FOR QUALIFIED SIGN LANGUAGE INTERPRETERS AND QUALIFIED BILINGUAL INTERPRETERS UPON REQUEST. PLEASE CALL 639-4171, EXT. 320 (VOICE) OR 684-2772 (TDD- TELECOMMUNICATIONS DEVICES FOR THE DEAF) NO LESS THAN ONE WEEK PRIOR TO THE HEARING TO MAKE ARRANGEMENTS. ANYONE WISHING TO PRESENT WRITTEN TESTIMONY ON THIS PROPOSED ACTION MAY DO SO IN WRITING PRIOR TO OR AT THE PUBLIC HEARING. ORAL TESTIMONY MAY BE PRESENTED AT THE PUBLIC HEARING. AT THE PUBLIC HEARING, THE HEARINGS OFFICER WILL RECEIVE A STAFF REPORT PRESENTATION FROM THE CITY PLANNER; OPEN THE PUBLIC HEARING; AND INVITE BOTH ORAL AND WRITTEN TESTIMONY. THE HEARINGS OFFICER MAY CONTINUE THE PUBLIC HEARING TO ANOTHER MEETING TO OBTAIN SLR 95-0005 BONITA BRIDGE WIDENING April 18,1995 ADDITIONAL INFORMATION, OR (-LUSE THE PUBLIC HEARING AND TAKt ACTION ON THE APPLICATION. IF A PERSON SUBMITS EVIDENCE IN SUPPORT TO THE APPLICATION AFTER APRIL 18, 1995, ANY PARTY IS ENTITLED TO REQUEST A CONTINUANCE OF THE HEARING. IF THERE IS NO CONTINUANCE GRANTED AT THE HEARING, ANY PARTICIPANT IN THE HEARING MAY REQUEST THAT THE RECORD REMAIN OPEN FOR AT LEAST SEVEN DAYS AFTER THE HEARING. INCLUDED IN THIS NOTICE IS A LIST OF APPROVAL CRITERIA APPLICABLE TO THE REQUEST FROM THE TIGARD COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT CODE AND THE TIGARD COMPREHENSIVE PLAN. APPROVAL OR DISAPPROVAL OF THE REQUEST BY THE HEARINGS OFFICER WILL BE BASED UPON THESE CRITERIA AND THESE CRITERIA ONLY. AT THE HEARING IT IS IMPORTANT THAT COMMENTS RELATING TO THE REQUEST PERTAIN SPECIFICALLY TO THE APPLICABLE CRITERIA LISTED. FAILURE TO RAISE AN ISSUE IN PERSON OR BY LETTER AT SOME POINT PRIOR TO THE CLOSE OF THE HEARING ON THE REQUEST OR FAILURE TO PROVIDE SUFFICIENT SPECIFICITY TO AFFORD THE DECISION MAKER AN OPPORTUNITY TO RESPOND TO THE ISSUE PRECLUDES AN APPEAL TO THE LAND USE BOARD OF APPEALS BASED ON THAT ISSUE. ALL DOCUMENTS AND APPLICABLE CRITERIA IN THE ABOVE-NOTED FILE ARE AVAILABLE FOR INSPECTION AT NO COST OR COPIES CAN BE OBTAINED FOR TEN CENTS PER PAGE. AT LEAST SEVEN DAYS PRIOR TO THE HEARING, A COPY OF THE STAFF REPORT WILL BE AVAILABLE FOR INSPECTION AT NO COST, OR A COPY CAN BE OBTAINED FOR TEN CENTS PER PAGE. FOR FURTHER INFORMATION PLEASE CONTACT THE STAFF PLANNER WILL D'ANDREA AT (503) 639-4171, TIGARD CITY HALL, 13125 SW HALL BOULEVARD, TIGARD, OREGON. I 0 0 U 0 Z V')PROJECT > ° < SITE ? LOCATION MAP ., < Z 1► v, _, So.\ ® C U m L v )) a p F X13 wA¢1MGTON L �/ 1 COUNTY . COUNTT C. ,A UNITY CO< .Q� N-,,,. AREA ii I { eSW BONITA RD r„wu ffi^ �-! I CD aW `yam - T C".ACXUA$ J C H C 1 C ' (, COUNTY I COUNTY ` Q I 2 \ ) ^ — ; \ n ) Z n 3 \ o• 3 5 TT j^ u�\ If< I � v' t1 17 PURPOSE: WIDENING OF EXISTING PROPOSED BRIDGE WIDENING CONCRETE BRIDGE IN: CITY OF TIGARD DATUM: NGVD 1929 OVER: FANNO CREEK VI CI_'\%I T Y ® RIVER MI 2.69 ADJACENT PROPERTY OWNERS. COUNTY OF: WASHINGTON STATE OF: OREGON _ MAP APPLICATION BY: CITY OF TIGARD V— I SHEET 1 OF 4 DATE: 2/17/95 SLR 95-0005 BONITA BRIDGE WIDENING April 18, 1995 SLR 95-0005 BONITA BRIDGE WIDENING (Page 1 of 1) L COLUMBIA SUNDAY SCHOOL WASHINGTON COUNTY BY JOHN E MOUNT FACILITIES MANAGMENT - ADMIN PO BOX 234 150 NE FIRST AVE ROOM B-7 PORTLAND OR 97219 HILLSBORO OR 97123 CLARENE & MARY MCGARR CLARENCE CARLSON ET AL PUGET DIE CASTING CO % PUGET CORP OF WASHINGTON 7440 SW BONITA ROAD 7440 SW BONITA ROAD PORTLAND OR 97224 PORTLAND OR 97224 BONITA HOLDINGS, INC DALE DENSON 4252 MUSQUEAM DRIVE BY COLLEGE PLACE ASSOC VANCOUVER BC CANADA V6N PO BOX 389 PALO ALTO CA 94302 MARCIENE TERRACE ASSOCIATES MILTON 0 BROWN BY COLLEGE PLACE ASSOC 301 NW MURRAY ROAD PO BOX 389 PORTLAND OR 94302 PALO ALTO CA 94302 DO NOT MAIL CITY OF TIGARD 13125 SW HALL BLVD BONITA.MI. - TIGARD OR 97223 MID-STATE INDUSTRIAL SERVICE, INC. 9398 SW TIGARD AVENUE TIGARD OR 97223 PUGET CORP OF WASHINGTON CAST PRODUCTS CLARENCE CARLSON ET AL 2101 MILDRED STREET WEST TACOMA WA 98466 fr • CIW OF T1GARD) \ \ / �� PM 1312 W. Hall Blvd. 1► \ y --1--\;- � ,� , - Tigard, 4r -6on 97223 �� ��� `�` '�(�' ia, APB. m & ��� ;, -. t. r. izzr , ,,,,,et , 1 ,. ,,N, ad _!K \ ll��y�' o f. ,1i `.,5 \O \ - NCE CARLSON ET AL `& PUGET CORP OF WASHINGTON-� (-)s.,) 11 fh 41- ' , ``^ 7440 SW BONITA • • ∎ D \w PORTLAND OR 97224 111„„,i1 11,1„1."1"1,1,,111.,11,1"1",,11,1"1.1„1,,I.1,1.1".11.1 CITY OF TIGARD -} - -�- . y.�.. 13125 S.W. Hall Blvd. „ ()\--‘4';--- _� , a.aCSiA �. ,,. Tigard,Oregon 97223 6 APR I$'95 ` �e ” .. 53S Ong -04”.~' w 4. ti° 199 ,.�,. ., . .� •.. ig6°' ,ad pl _ v6),1/4)_• G S CLARENE & MARY MCGARR ' % PUGET DIE CASTING CO (� 7440 SW BONITA ROAD PORTLAND OR 97224 �. 1(;):::-) Ili 111„1tl1l I ICI„II„I„I,I1 11,1„II,1„1,,,,1111,1111„1„111,I,I,,,II,I Lct - ^ITY OF TIGARD :el i �. 13125 S.W. Hall Blvd. Tigard, Oregon 97223 APR i s ss :s 1 'x .; � 3 2 1K �R� . (10.11,E E r ,558D4++ . �N Aftwiliatect Akomhown MID-STATE INDUSTRIAL SERVICE, INC. 9398 SW TIGARD AVENUE TIGARD OR 97223 MID-398 972233044 1N 04/19/95 RETURN TO SENDER NO FORWARD ORDER ON FILE UNABLE TO FORWARD RETURN TO SENDER MI MIL Il Ili3lflFlEl'{IfIIiI!!il?IEiIIiIIIIII.IEIflIflI I I I1a1I _.'JLKDKUI' LIV1L I UF:' ILIIId 111 : 1JUJ�J�64.2.,! FLb 11' '�J5 1.2 : 45 Nu .UU.2 F' .UI 11 { l 0 t 0 � L t LOCATION WASHINGTON • MULT 'MAN AREA COUNTY COON Y Ill VICINITY _ - AREA 1 NI '1_ 0 0 WI 1 OREGON I '-__ YAMHILL COUNTY l /-\ i-- - CL ACKM AS I MARION COUNTY COUNTY J I f U o 01 3 5 }~ \\ MILES PROJECT Z < 1 SITE Q z v LOCATION MAP o , z Q s'°� Ni 0o z AP 217 13 z -P J k 0 <,?<,,,.., - 11 ,... ) ... o \------__A c'- N { 1 - SW BONITA RD co s >4• 0\I i Q Y J Q F=- ix 2 II U > 0 Q N N (r) I N- (1) z 1.--- cn I PURPOSE: WIDENING OF EXISTING PROPOSED BRIDGE WIDENING CONCRETE BRIDGE IN: CITY OF TIGARD DATUM: NGVD 1929 OVER: FANNO CREEK ADJACENT PROPERTY OWNERS: VICINITY COUNTY FVEWASHINGTON r STATE OF: OREGON ? _ � ` APPLICATION BY: CITY OF TIGARD 0 - 1� SHEET 1 OF 4 DATE: 2/17/95 DVERDRUP CIVIL F'Uk l LHN 1D : 15062328423 FEB 17 '95 12 :45 Nu .UU2 F .O 1' . „�� �\ ,I A\ \----o- Wino° r-___–_- ! —\ \ ;q II \ ill a 1/ 'a � N vi J �ir�N - —_—_-4F"4"----- ---- _ I I,I ` N u. dx N�Z I I + c:::, F-' c a\H -S u i , 1 �� 4 ` t I\ I t k, o 3 I i I, i 0 / il / I b 1 u I1I / t r g \� co y tli 7 i N- - R J I — � J — �/ — � 14P ▪ I o / - p � / \/ I. J �. _ - t 5i I) , - - - - _I' � - - — �� !sJ r _ I pJ -- _ �I L -, 3JN31 W e rail � r.. i � 1 ' / III —m�Z-: Q m Id oW /1 1 n 0 / ° tv o II L .I vMavoa .o ,ro .z—.09 II ' / ) // / / 11 11 `: PURPOSE: WIDENING OF EXISTING PROPOSED BRIDGE WIDENING CONCRETE BRIDGE IN: CITY OF TIGARD DATUM: NGVD 1929 D P ]�� OVER: FANNO CREEK ADJACENT PROPERTY OWNERS: . LA \` COUNTY RIVER O MI 2.69 WASHINGTON STATE OF: OREGON — APPLICATION BY: CITY OF TIGARD 0 — SHEET 2 OF 4 DATE: 2/17/95 .._ . 1# oVLRDRUF CIVIL FURTLHN 1L! : 15U3.328423 FEB 17 '95 12 :46 No .002 F .08 OB'Lc l '13 0'd .11 ,,,ii, f 1N38 1 Ell U 1 ill z O VU ° 1 aci ka a o a a O Po)w J n G. w W ..-J lil A Cg.-y d 087.£1 13 'O'd �� £WN38 � I I = H N PI 11111 o 0 P'< o ^rn z Ch 4A 4' N V 0 O C r aw O Z e • z x Y ix <• -, L. O ( W6 0 0 OS'Lf 1 '13 '0'd Z 1N38 1 11 1 w Y= Y• N U Q V W o n �LJ •••• U VI Z VIII .V- t-36-i- 08 al '13 'O'd IhII 8 nun_ l 1N383J 11 •• — U ■ Oz u. — W ;m o — PURPOSE: WIDENING OF EXISTING PROPOSED BRIDGE WIDENING CONCRETE BRIDGE IN: CITY OF TIGARD DATUM: NGVD 1929 OVER: FANNO CREEK ADJACENT PROPERTY OWNERS: ELEVATION ® RIVER MI 2.69 COUNTY OF: WASHINGTON STATE OF: OREGON 2a _ APPLICATION BY: CITY OF TIGARD 0 — SHEET 3 OF 4 DATE: 2/17/95 1 GOO D O n Tr GOO v D O c -I Z 17 1 I I D C o -0 + • C+ C7 K Z1 O • Irt m N c Z _1 m T -I Z m •• o 7J O 73 C7 f o o m �. N m 2 r --1 c0 c-) T C VARIES FROM 0" EAST END OF BRIDGE O -r1 0 60'-2" i TO 5 1/2' WEST END OF BRIDGE CI Frl Z X 6_7 44'-0" ROADWAY 6-7 ••�_ N = U NEW STEEL NEW C.I.P. CONC. Q WIDENED {/� -i REMOVE EXIST. ASPHALT z RAILING SIDEWALK BRIDGE k WEARING SURFACE. REPLACE o e O NEW 1'-3" THICK PROFILE �� PROPOSED c W/ NEW ASPHALT WEARING 'T _ I-' NEW UTILITY PRECAST CONCRETE GRADE ROADWAY SURFACE OVER ENTIRE WIDTH n �( C CONDUIT DECK PANEL (TYP) Q. EXISTING OF WIDENED ROADWAY.- i - ___ —L E4.4 (TMP) EXISTING POST BRIDGE 1 1 1—. j j• RAILING. CURB N EXISTING POST LJ11 • 1" � AND SIDEWALK — _ I Il 1 —5' RAILING AND CURB ,• o+ j I ` Cr •19� •�6„ TO BE REMOVED a TO BE REMOVED ,��• 1% �u _ Ci1 •ws IV Li ,X1.1] I I EXSTING PILE I I I I I (EXISTING DECK I I CA CAP TO REMAIN PANELS TO REMAIN I KNEW C.I.P. CONC. I I I I III II I l I I PILE CAP NEW C.I.P. ONC. REMOVE EXIST. I �I (� I I PILE CAP I I I I I I I UTILITY CONDUITS O \ I I NEW 12 3/4" 0.0. I I I I I II & HANGERS PIPE PILE ("YP) LI U U IU L.Ni EXIST. 12 3/4"0.D. PIPE PILE (TYP) -•1 1'-6"3 PILE SPA = 8'-CT 4'-2" 30'-0' 3 PILE SPA = 15'-0' I'-6' ill 00 N D V)f7 O - 1 WIDENING = 12'-8' 1 EXISTING BRIDGE = 32'-0' WIDENING = 15'-6" ..41-4 Z i fll 0 >c m .. O Lc.m r -1 z ) Qv cn 4, > p- ® m - p TYPICAL SECTION — WIDENED BRIDGE o D7O70zOO LOOKING WEST 0 4 8 N CD � * X - - Scale in Feet .. D - ZZ ) mO o ( m G) � o to O O Z G N Z z m ___I C) v O T c, 7J G Cn p 1_0 CITY OF TIGARD Washington County, Oregon NOTICE OF FINAL ORDER a BY THE HEARINGS OFFICER Concerning Case Number(s): SENSITIVE LANDS REVIEW (SLR) 95-0005 Name of Owner: City of Tigard Name of Applicant: Same Address of Applicant: 13125 SW Hall Boulevard City: Tigard State: Oregon Zip: 97223 Address of Property: SW Bonita Road crossing of Fanno Creek City: Tigard State: Oregon Zip: 97223 Request ■ A request for Sensitive Lands Review approval to allow the widening of a bridge over Fanno Creek from 30 feet to 60 feet, located on SW Bonita Road. LOCATION: SW Bonita Road crossing of Fanno Creek. APPLICABLE REVIEW CRITERIA: Community Development Code Sections 18.84. Zone: I-L (Light Industrial). The Light Industrial zoning allows public support facilities, building maintenance services, manufacturing of finished products, packaging and processing, wholesale, storage, and distribution, among other uses. Action ■ H Approval as requested ® Approval with conditions H Denial Notice: Notice was published in the newspaper, posted at City Hall and mailed to: 0 Owners of record within the required distance ® Affected governmental agencies 0 The affected Citizen Involvement Team Facilitator 0 The applicant and owner(s) THE DECISION SHALL BE FINAL ON , 1995 UNLESS AN APPEAL IS FILED Final Decision The adopted findings of fact, decision and statement of conditions can be obtained from the City of Tigard Planning Department, Tigard City Hall, 13125 SW Hall Boulevard, Tigard, Oregon 97223. Appeal: Any party to the decision may appeal this decision in accordance with 18.32.290 (B) and Section 18.32.370, which provides that a written appeal may be filed within ten (10) days after notice is given and sent. The appeal may be submitted on City forms and must be accompanied by the appeal feels) of $315.00 plus transcript costs, not in excess of $500.00. THE DEADLINE FOR FILING OF AN APPEAL IS 3:30 P.M. ON , 1995 Questions: If you have any questions, please call the City of Tigard Planning Department at (503) 639.4171. HEARINGS OFFICER NOTICE OF FINAL ORDER Dalton/Burge April 18, 1995 SUB 94-0005/SLR 94-0007 2S112AB-01600 . ,,..-----. 2S112AB-01700 L COLUMBIA SUNDAY SCHOOL TIGARD, CITY OF BY BONITA-COMMUNITY CHURCH 13125 SW HALL 856 N ROUSET PO BOX 23397 PORTLAND OR 97219 TIGARD OR 97223 2S112AB-01800 2S112AB-01902 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . WASHINGTON COU MID-STATE INDUSTRIAL FACILITIE MGMT-ADMIN SERVICE, INC 150 N RST AVE, RM B-7 9398 SW TIGARD AVE H SBORO OR 97124 TIGARD OR 97223 2S112BA-00300 2S112BD-00100 MARCIENE TERRAC -ASSOCIATES BONITA HOLDINGS/„INC-----4 OLDING J INC'-4 BY COLLEGE-PLACE ASSOC 4252 MUSQUEAF(DR PO BO 89 VANCOUVER BC CANADA V6N PALO ALTO CA 94302 2S112AC-00600 2S112AC-00700 MCGARR, CLARENCE H & MARY----- lARY- CARLSON, CLARENCE A ET AL C/o PUGET D B ASTING CO c/o PUGET CORP OF WASHINGTON 7440 SW BONITA RD 7440 SW BONITA RD PORTLAND OR 97223 PORTLAND OR 97224 i. _ ( I 44\ Y4'3nb- SLJZIVI�n • I/4 NE WASHINGTON COUNTY OREC 3 SCALE 111= 100' t t v. p0 S.W. T g B 16_ T90-2163 2 - 56.34 5.14 1 551.55 T p�40 E 93 I Q I i 300 7.80 600 NI 2/4 AC. _�..... 2.07 /.67Ac. 1N N •• Al a 300-AI• N o. 26.38 I I i . O N,, tL _ 117.65'_ 1 » p G -�_ 7.41 r g ? Z i al r 42.90 -a- 424.30' 6.70 381.40' 1 / 8 TOO N89°S2' E C) os 11.90 86AC, 18.97 m_$ 50' O 23.43 8 i0 Z w AG'. 18.43 S 840 52' r O a a _ 387.20' 3.47 a -400-MI9p 10.82 429.70' $• a eo88.27 03N 800 • . r /� 801 t6.117 .96Ac. / ° .83 Ac. ,. 26.eay o .4 `O. /' m 3'22 o c+ `, - 34.43 > 9 GREENWAY \c, STA.4165 21.. F I ! 240.50 \-f- 23. ° _ I Z. \ A ! 900 \ b AC F N 198 it i �-- _ _- �'' e i.e. 134.14 It w 1000 ' ,\1 SEE MAP -- .43 AC. 2S 11280 1000-M I b ■ 520' 171.21' 15.72 490.24', 40• � � 141.21' 104.7 1316.06 1200 5 89°49'20 w 0 1 100 3.53 AC. 13 /.64 Ac. N T ti • 20 _ C F.. \ l N� N J m N N - I 21 N w •96.75' S D 4. • 23-74 233.25' N r a A _ O 19 p i �'°� p P- V _ 264.34 _ _ .. r r 'f 503.51 1/.38300 Ac. /.83 AC. N O h - t$ • 18 1500 22 Z o D v 2.76 Ac. 510.20' i CS. 13002 ) 195.20 -° ,20 5 20 - 316.20 . • 1601 1600 .77 AC. /.05Ac. D i\ C ° - GREENWAY o • o xi O _� ��. �� D SOUTH LINE JAMES F vN U 23 o 201.62 516.82' u,- • > + 60' 1700 /,76 AC. rn Q Z c m 16 WI/4 SECTlO�! 12 1 T2S RIW W.M. • WASHINGTON COUNTY OREGON 2S ! 12BD SEE MAP SCALE I' = 100' 2S I I2BA 0 on \\L\\ \\\ � _ r CANCELLED TAX LOTS \\\t \\\\\\1C\\\\\\\\ N 2900.1900,2600,2000, �K\\\\\\\\a\\\\\\\\ ��-4- o1_Ya27s 91-21021 s a9'S3`4S"w 121 91-21023 91-07372 1 n ■ 900 800 3309e 76 ��°,., _ 100 330.9e N 39 Ac. 374 c. Z 349 AC. In m on o. le 67 r N N Q In 1,41i 1,41i 66 h IN N 65 0 N ros' loo' H — — — — — — ' 700 2.8/ AC. =r,.-,!! r— _ 33C. f – — 3 s'S0.I6`__ ____ _._ 62 0• IN 63 N N 64 \h ?.. 329.2E• 1 329.29' 4 5' 329.29' • 4 0' 600 S /.88 Ac. 200 \ 1.88 AC J le 55 a i; ° • 54 m N 53 o SEE MAP - N 2S 1 I2AC !8.41' 32841' 1 328.42' 500 CD 300 /.BB AC. 23--74 562 AC. i0 N ad '" FOR ASSESSMENT ad 51 N m 52 �$ PURPOSES ONLY DJ cN DO NOT RELY ON = FOR ANY OTHER USE S ss' 327.54' 327.55' T� 400 . ._ 3r GCS- - . ..• ,...T N 375 AC. _ :'. JUN 28 1?94 on 42 ICS pp r� _ �• N N N 41 g �i>.�' ' Wf_i i0Yr ili:• ! S N ` �rs 1 0. ..6e' at a2a.aT' + r a' T 1600 — .53 AC. lir N itO h In f id o a 39 0 40 p 132' N 1800 • .45 AC. ;, b �� (3o-F4)4 f \/ r d Obi V r� j,c (7...._ . • . 6000 ). • 2550 .53 Ac. O MAP R=51652 O /f 2S 1 1 8 -�/A- "Y O r 334.6 \SEE 333.5 EAST 16E.75 es 6100 li: -- /i.. 500 400 r M CANCELLED TRACT A yw 3300,5600,100,5700, rDEDICATED 4.96 Ac. 4.96.4c. /3A ... /`�`� a GREENWAY is ' 5900 N o 6..41 4 ti z ', z f 6200 '0, R=5 1 9� S BpO47'15"W 5.57 Ac. C 135 5901 Q E 4=25' 09 At. .� \ e e 15Q r I r la j' 5801 I .71 Ac. ` 1 Y 6• \\\\ . • . 5800 • bd *„.... 29 Ac. 6 . :2BA • MAP �0 =NTAL N0. I •• `...------- b "I:, k► o 0 z ^ TRACT "8" `�G JNDJs RiA ! Co Tr,4, nn 5601 1 pEplaplfR//AC. z /� r I SEE MAP �REEM1 �2- J- r j .,,_ ,1A=M23a '74? R I 2S I IZAB z S89°49'25"W WEST 316.51 200 i 2.919 Ac. r r r r / FOR ASSESSMENT PURPOSES ONLY 0 0 �� DO NOT RELY ON C'') SW = �' FOR ANY OTHER US WEAWAY x 0 M y A PK n 0 t 0 N 300 o it- 1.96 �' x -V. U EAST III 0 p ` Ii}' r d 600 �s4-4�ly i I Co g .....664c. J•� O• C j'N w' �T ' N op .•0 < 1� '�N '[Sf. r-N N •A �' w v 1.,... /� = I 113.64 I a z . z O r Ill N 1 ' 61 3335 166.77 151.10 165.4 I 173.5 NM L 91-37373 ' 91-28214 g 91-21020 �• ' ` 0 9'1-21019 2 TO PUBLIC 795/353 BONITAo A ., r W GI C.R No.736(40'WIDE) o ROAD N 4.. TO PUBLIC 195/353 P.-Z SEE MAP I W D X W 2S I I2BD Z "'a ccriQ TIGARD 2S I I2BA "LS 1 tUt. Ell'of4) r9ti I/4 CDR. / / e° iii. ro r�...""Ir 135.42 606.75' `Y NORTH LINE JAMES H. CKLIN DLG. 43 e 400 5.00 AC. \ i in a' so G \ \ Of tiF \, ti \ \ 71. P \ aO 'a ie4'D2 2300 �O \ 4• • 2266 /.00 Ac. 'o y 700 ��\ N F 2.52 AC. \ Rq/4 Rpq�R=te=D, •1 c+ 3/2.0J to...N / 2200 \ 1 e��'e y o y 1.00 Ac. 4 (CS. i l l s ��, '° rie-MAP � "6 - 4 C , 128A 1 • �� J J i�I I J \ �i -.N • 800 , 4 O� ` 8.90 AC.,77A 2100 4"1 y 800-AI `xi ,00 Ac. p �� /0,..1 a-,„00 a 2 I s i TAXLOTTED ON MAP 2S 112BA 3 9� i; a It. '' 11J y� lb Phi. , _ 0 �m� 5 9� ] NDU :�7R 1 J A L zz �� TRACT "B" • 2000 Itr 66 100 AC. 2 m ",>° NN1� PA J c 4e 1800 . oe'O, \ �� D, 157 A . '-e e, G� °, s 1300 1901p 2.43AC. In 1900 e //8Ac. U , �O rajet 23_74 N o N. -..„ ;° = I N ,..., PO \ • e:\ O � \ 1 I IV 50 50 ✓ w Zig ' i'P 60 9 1000 N / .//AC 1700 / INITIAL M S E9° IT'OS"W POINT t9.L0 292 436.66 ` �Q` t_ ` N �• y ' \ 1 \oh00 n n r n"B N S.W. 4D 5 • i. V I 1 pi. :. WI WI REQUEST FOR COMMENTS CITY OF TIGARD OREGON TO: / / ( g 1'�� DATE: April 18, 1995 FROM: Tigard Planning Department STAFF CONTACT: Will D'Andrea (x315) Phone: (503) 639-4171 Fax: (503) 684-7297 RE: SENSITIVE LANDS REVIEW (SLR) 95-0005 BONITA BRIDGE WIDENING. A request for Sensitive Lands Review approval to allow the widening of a bridge over Fanno Creek from 30 feet to 60 feet, located on SW Bonita Road. LOCATION: SW Bonita Road crossing of Fanno Creek. APPLICABLE REVIEW CRITERIA: Community Development Code Sections 18.84. ZONE: I-L (Light Industrial). The Light Industrial zoning allows public support facilities, building maintenance services, manufacturing of finished products, packaging and processing, wholesale, storage, and distribution, among other uses. Attached is the Site Plan and applicant's statement for your review. From information supplied by various departments and agencies and from other information available to our staff, a report and recommendation will be prepared and a decision will be rendered on the proposal in the near future. If you wish to comment on this application, WE NEED YOUR COMMENTS BACK BY: Friday- April 28, 1995. You may use the space provided below or attach a separate letter to return your comments. If you are unable to respond by the above date, please phone the staff contact noted above with your comments and confirm your comments in writing as soon as possible. If you have any questions, contact the Tigard Planning Department, 13125 SW Hall Boulevard, Tigard, OR 97223. PLEASE CHECK THE FOLLOWING ITEMS THAT APPLY: We have reviewed the proposal and have no objections to it. Please contact of our office. _ Please refer to the enclosed letter. Written comments provided below: (Please provide the following information) Name of Person Commenting: Phone Number: IN II -I - - SLR 95-0005 BONITA BRIDGE WIDENING April 18,1995 REQUEST FOR COMMENTS 1 fIFICATION LIST FOR LAND USE & DEVELOPMENT, CATIONS i . CITIZEN INVOLVEMENT TEAMS Laird 'CIT Area (N) (C) " Placed for review in Library CIT Book " CPO NO. x CtIY DEPARTMENTS uildfng Official/Dave Scott U-f6lice/Kelly Jennings =�eld Operations/John Acker _City Recorder/Cathy Wheatley >- gineenng/Michael Anderson _Permits Facilitator/Jerree Gaynor Advanced Planning/Carol Landsman — Department/Michael Miller SPECIAL DISTRICTS _Fire Marshall Unified Sewerage Agency — Tualatin Valley Water District Wa. County Fire District SWM Program/Lee Walker PO Box 745 (pick-up box) 155 N. First Street Beaverton,OR 97075 Hillsboro.OR 97124 ' AFFECTED JURISD4CTIONS Wa. Co. Dept. of Land Use&Transportotlon _Boundary Commission _METRO-GREENSPACES PROGRAM 150 N. First Avenue 800 NE Oregon St. 016.Suite 540 Mel Huie (CPA's/ZOA's) Hillsboro.OR 97124 Portland.OR 97232-2109 600 NE Grand Avenue Portland,OR 97232-2736 —Brent Curtis(CPA's) _State Highway Division —Jim Tice(IGA'S) Sam Hunaidi _ODOT/Region 1 _Mike Borreson (Engineer) PO Box 25412 Laurie Nicholson/Transportation Planning _Scott King(CPA's) Portland.OR 97225-0412 123 N.W. Flanders _Tom Harry(Current Planning App's) Portland.OR 97209-4037 Lynn Bailey(Current Planning App's) _Oregon DLCD(CPA's/ZOA's) 1175 Court Street.N.E. _Other _ City of Beaverton Salem.CR 97310-0590 Jim Hendryx- Principal Planner _City of Portland PO Box 4755 _City of Durham Planning Director Beaverton,OR 97076 City Manager 1120 SW 5th PO Box 23483 Portland.OR 97204 _City of IGng City Tigard,OR 97281-3483 City Manager _City of Lake Oswego 15300 SW 116th —City of Tualatin City Manager IGng City,OR 97224 PO Box 369 PO Box 369 Tualatin,OR 97062 Lake Oswego,OR 97034 SPECTAL"AGENCIES I —General Telephone —Portland General Electric _Columbia Cable Engineering Office Brian Moore Craig Eyestone PO Box 23416 14655 SW Old Schotls Ferry Road 14200 SW Brigadoon Court Tigard,OR 97281-3416 Beaverton,OR 97007 Beaverton,OR 97005 —NW Natural Gas —Metro Area Communications/Jason Hewitt _Tri-Met Transit Development Scott Palmer Twin Oaks Technology Center Km Knox.Project Planner 220 NW Second Avenue 1815 NW 169th Place 5-6020 710 NE Holladay Street Portland,OR 97209-3991 Beaverton,OR 97006-4886 Portland,OR 97232 ICI Ccblevision of Oregon _US West Communications _Southern Pacific Transportation Co. —Linda Peterson Pete Nelson Duane M. Forney, PLS- Project Engineer 3500 SW Bond Street 421 SW Oak Street 800 NW 6th Avenue Room 324,Union Station Portland,OR 97201 Portland,OR 97204 Portland,OR 97209 STAIE AGENCIES Aeronautics tics Division(ODOT) ivision of State Lances _US Postal Service _Commerce Dept. - M.H. Pork _Fish &Wildlife Randy Hammock,Growth Coordinator _PUC —DOGAMI Cedar Mill Station _ Dept.of Environ. Quality Portland.CR 97229-9998 a FEDERAL AGENCIES Eorps. of Engineers — Other n,100N,',DO R V,RfTO11C INS Oregon RECROWE ' March 15 , 1995 " DSL MAR 2 0 1995 CITY OF TIGARD DIVISION OF STATE LANDS Mr . Randy Woo ley STATE LAND BOARD City Engineer City of Tigard Governor r KITZHABER 13125 SW Hall Blvd. PHIL KEISLING Tigard, OR 97223 Secretary of State JIM HILL Re: State Permit No . : RF 9515 State Treasurer Corps Project No . : Fanno Creek - Widening of Existing Bridge 775 Summer Street NE Salem,OR 97310-1337 (503) 378-3805 Dear Mr . Wooley: FAX (503)378-4844 TTY (503) 378-4615 We have received your application to widen the existing 23 ' concrete bridge to 60 ' 2" , in Fanno Creek. The Division of State Lands requires a permit if you plan to remove, fill or alter 50 cubic yards or more of material within the banks of a waterway. Based on your application, your project involves less then 50 cubic yards of material , therefore a State removal-fill permit is not required. You must also receive authorization, when required, from the U. S. Army Corps of Engineers and local planning department before beginning construction. Please contact us if you have any questions . Sincerely, 4/X4,- m-11(4 William L. Parks Natural Resource Coordinator Field Operations WLP/lsg per : 295 cc : Coordinator, U. S. Army Corps of Engineers Oregon Dept . of Fish and Wildlife A7W n 5044 7? /ivd y f,4 T O. Oct".��-1Y�:°�,, DEPARTMENT OF THE ARMY Z,41-S' 7�. Qe:{" �,\z\ PORTLAND DISTRICT,CORPS OF ENGINEERS • �, i4, P.O.BOX 2946 ;,1Ic n' PORTLAND,OREGON 97208-2946 e ,_ __ 0.p'P Reply to !'„ ,�0 Attention ot: March 17, 1995 d D � Operations Division U -. o 1 1995 a 2 • SUBJECT: Permit Application ID No: 95-224 T,GARD CO °F 1 Mr. Randy Wooley, City Engineer City of Tigard 13125 SW. Hall Blvd. Tigard, Oregon 97223 Dear Mr. Wooley: Your application for widening of the Bonita Road bridge over Fanno Creek may not require a Department of the Army permit. The new piles appear to be the only structural work or fill below the ordinary high water (OHW) line in Fanno Creek. OHW line is generally considered equivalent to the two-year flood event . Department of the Army authorization is not required for piling in non-navigable waters . The bank protection work, retaining wall and other work all appear to be above the OHW line. If you determine otherwise, that there is fill to be placed below the OHW line, please advise me and we will process your application accordingly. If you have any questions regarding the authorization of your project please contact me or telephone (503) 326-6996 . Sincerely, 4a / lsiee — Project Manager Regulatory Branch