Loading...
MMD2004-00007 MMD 2004 00007 ANDRUS OFFICE BUILDINGS MODIFICATION " 4 • March 29, 2004 Jack Kriz Mildren Design Group 7650 SW Beveland Tigard, OR 97223 RE: Minor Modification Request, Case File No. MMD2004-00007 Dear Mr. Kriz: This letter is in response to your request for a Minor Modification (MMD2004-00007) of the approved site development located at 7115 and 7155 SW Beveland, WCTM 2S101AB, Tax Lots 02100 and 02201. You have requested altering the exterior elevations of the approved buildings, adding a row of parking, and relocating the trash disposal area. Analysis of Modification Request: Section 18.360.060 of the Tigard Development Code Site Development Review chapter, states; "any modification which is not within the description of a major modification as provided in section 18.360.050 shall be considered a minor modification." Section 18.360.050 states that the Director shall determine that a major modification(s) has resulted if one (1) or more of the changes listed below have been proposed: 1. An increase in dwelling unit density or lot coverage for residential development. The proposal does not involve residential property. Therefore, this standard does not apply. 2. A change in the ratio or number of different types of dwelling units. This criterion is not applicable, as this request does not involve a residential development. 3. A change that requires additional on-site parking in accordance with Chapter 18.765. The proposed changes to the buildings will alter their exterior and interior layouts, however, no additional square footage is proposed. As the prior approved use will also remain unchanged, no additional on site parking is required as a result of the proposed changes. The applicant has proposed additional on site parking, but this is at the applicant's discretion and was not prompted by a requirement for the additional parking. 4. A change in the type of commercial or industrial structures as defined by the Uniform Building Code. The previous building was classified for office occupancy. The proposed changes will not alter this building code classification. No change in the structural type of the building is proposed. Therefore, this criterion is not applicable. Page 1 of 2 5. An increase in the height of the building(s) by more than 20 percent. The applicant's proposed changes will result in a building height of 29' 8". The originally approved buildings were 30 feet in height. Therefore, this standard is met. 6. A change in the type and location of accessways and parking areas where off-site traffic would be affected. No changes to the location of the site access is proposed. An additional row of parking is proposed along the entrance driveway, however, this parking will not affect off site traffic, therefore this criterion is satisfied. 7. An increase in vehicular traffic to and from the site and the increase can be expected to exceed 100 vehicles per day. Since no additional square footage is proposed, and the use will be the same as the approved use, there will be no additional traffic generated. Therefore, this criterion is satisfied. 8. An increase in the floor areas proposed for a non-residential use by more than ten percent excluding expansions under 5,000 square feet. The proposal will not increase the square footage of the building. 9. A reduction in the area reserved for common open space and/or usable open space that reduces the open space area below the minimum required by the code or reduces the open space areas by more than ten percent. There is no common open space required for this type of development, therefore this standard does not apply. 10. A reduction of project amenities (recreational facilities, screening; and/or, landscaping provisions) below the minimum established by the code or by more than ten percent where specified in the site plan. There are no specific amenities provided by the existing development. However, the proposed parking lot expansion will reduce the amount of landscaping. Based on the site plans provided, the landscaping will remain above 15%, at 18.8% on one parcel and 28.8% on the other. Therefore this criterion is met. 11. A modification to the conditions imposed at the time of Site Development Review approval that is not the subject of criteria (B). 1 through 10 above. The site was reviewed and approved through case file number SDR2002-00002. There are no specific conditions that are affected by the modification request. In fact, one condition (Condition #8.B.) required that the trash enclosure area be relocated to provide sufficient area for the required buffer area. The modification achieves that requirement. THIS REQUEST HAS BEEN APPROVED BY THE PLANNING DEPARTMENT SUBJECT TO THE FOLLOWING LIMITATIONS. PLEASE SUBMIT A COPY OF THIS LETTER WITH YOUR BUILDING PERMIT APPLICATION. This request is determined to be a minor modification to an existing site. The Director's designee has determined that the proposed minor modification of this existing site will continue to promote the general welfare of the City and will not be significantly detrimental, nor injurious to surrounding properties provided that, development which occurs after this decision complies with all applicable local, state, and federal laws. If you need additional information or have any questions, please feel free to call me at (503) 639-4171 ext. 2428. Sincerely, Morgan Tracy Associate Planner is\curpin\morgan\workspace\mmd\mmd2004-00007(andrus office building).doc Page 2 of 2 APPLICANT MATERIALS MINOR MODIFICATION TYPE I APPLICATION CITY OF TIGARD 13125 SW Hall Blvd., Tigard, OR 97223 (503) 639-4171 FAX: (503) 684-7297 GENERAL INFORMATION Property Address/Location(s): 1 11 1155 5■■1 e.Ev Ev■r.1D Tax Map & Tax Lot#(s): W G r M 2S I o /aF, ri . Lo7S FOR STAFF USE ONLY 0? too 4 22A1 Site Size: I�, D°r�( `�1: 4 2,I 2A-6) SF Case No.(s): /,\Yl1() Applicant*: I L.DRF 1") --,14,1N) (,r,c.p e C, Other Case No.(s): 6 DR a-oo - oo o a Address: `7(,50 Receipt No.: —2 C>00 - I Ia 0 City/State: Ti (2-, O12 orJ Zip: t1 2Z`3 Application Accepted By: C - ec4-•-Ywy Primary Contact: JA(--44— 1 � Date: 3 as -0'1 Phone: S c . 2A-4-• bS�Z Fax:So�• 244.O4-17 Property Owner/Deed Holder(s)*: (Attach list if more than one) Date Determined Complete: i✓'1 t c HAt~t F���tiv�1 AlvDays Rev 2/28/2003 is\curpin\masters\revised\minormod mst Address: gear-0 Ste) Turt,..r.-r tN SW 1",)o Phone: City/State: 0-3 c 12-0 Zip: c\-1 * When the owner and the applicant are different people, the applicant REQUIRED SUBMITTAL ELEMENTS must be the purchaser of record or a lessee in possession with written (Note: applications will not be accepted authorization from the owner or an agent of the owner. The owner(s) without the required submittal elements) must sign this application in the space provided on the back of this form or submit a written authorization with this application. PROPOSAL SUMMARY E Application Form The owners of record of the subject property request permission for a ❑ Owner's Signature/Written Authorization Minor Modification. To review a modification as a Minor Modification, the Director must first find that the expansion does not ❑ Title Transfer Instrument or Deed invoke one or more of the 11 criteria discussed within Section © Site Development Plan (3 copies) 18.120.070(B) of the Tigard Development Code. If the modification exceeds the maximum allowed under any one or more of the ❑ Site/Plot Plan (reduced 8V;"x 11") following criteria, a Major Modification review is required. Major Modifications are processed in the same manner as a new Site ❑ Applicant's Statement (3 copies) Development Review. In a separate letter, please address the (Addressing Criteria Under Section 18.360.050(B) criteria below contained in Section 18.360.050(B) including a detailed la Filing Fee response to each criteria. 9 $446.00 1. An Increase in dwelling unit density or lot coverage for residential development. Jurisdiction: ® City ❑ Urb 2. A change in the ratio or number of different types of dwelling units. 3. A change that requires additional on-site parking in accordance with Chapter 18.765. In addition, the Director must find that the 4. A change in the type of commercial or industrial structures as defined by the Uniform proposed change complies with the underlying Building Code. standards of the applicable zoning district. To 5. An increase in the height of the building(s)by more than 20%. complete this review, the Applicant's proposal 6. A change in the type and location of accessways and parking areas where off-site must include a discussion indicating how the traffic would be affected. site expansion will continue to comply with the 7. An increase in vehicular traffic to and from the site and increase can be expected to minimum setback, building height, parking land exceed 100 vehicles per day. landscaping standards. Other applicable 8. An increase in the floor area proposed for a non-residential use by more than 10% requirements such as minimum Clear Vision excluding expansions under 5,000 square feet. areas near driveways and street intersections 9 A reduction in the area reserved for common open space and/or usable open space may also be applicable depending on where that reduces the open space area below the minimum required by this code or the building expansion is proposed to be reduces the open space area by more than ten percent. constructed on the site 10. A reduction of project amenities(recreational facilities, screening, and/or. landscaping provisions) below the minimum established by this code or by more than 10% where specified in the site plan. 11. A modification to the conditions imposed at the time of Site Development Review approval that are not the subject of Criteria 1 through 10 above. APPLICANTS: To consider an application complete, you will need to submit ALL of the REQUIRED SUBMITTAL ELEMENTS as described on the front of this application in the "Required Submittal Elements" box. (Detailed Submittal Requirement Information sheets can be obtained, upon request, for all types of Land Use Applications.) THE APPLICANT(S) SHALL CERTIFY THAT: • The above request does not violate any deed restrictions that may be attached to or imposed upon the subject property. • If the application is granted, the applicant will exercise the rights granted in accordance with the terms and subject to all the conditions and limitations of the approval. • All of the above statements and the statements in the plot plan, attachments, and exhibits transmitted herewith, are true; and the applicants so acknowledge that any permit issued, based on this application, and may be revoked if it is found that any such statements are false. • The applicant has read the entire contents of the application, including the policies and criteria, and understands the requirements for approving or denying the application. SIGNATURES of each owner of the subject property. DATED this / / day of Il1aa--CA , 20 1 /7 Ceni � Owner's Signature Owner's Signature Owner's Signature Owner's Signature MILDREN DESIGN GROUP,P.C. Architecture • Space Planning March 19,2004 City Tigard Ti and RECEIVED Att: Morgan Tracy MAR 2 2 2004 13125 SW Hall Blvd Tigard, Oregon 97223 ruvearoZoosesotiGnei" Re: 7115 and 7155 Beveland Buildings, SDR2002-00002 Minor Modification Dear Morgan: We are submitting the attached revised site and building plans for your review for a minor modification to the approved plans for this project. Our proposed changes are few in number and result from the project being purchased from the original applicant by our client. These changes include: 1. Adding a row of parking on the east side of the access drive way from S.W. Beveland. 2. Relocate trash enclosures per Pride Disposal review. 3. Revise the building floor plans and elevations without increasing the floor area above the maximum allowable FAR. Please review these revised drawings and narrative for compliance with the City's requirements. Thank you and please contact us if you need additional information. Cordially, (,Jack Kriz 7650 SW Beveland Street,Suite 120 Tigard,Oregon 97223 503 244 0552 Fax 503 244 0417 Narrative The City of Tigard provides section 18.360.050(B) with criteria for determining if a requested modification to an approved site plan is major or minor. Following is a analysis of this proposed modification relative to these criteria.The criteria from the code will be in italics with the comment in Arial font. A An increase in dwelling unit density, or lot coverage for residential development; This project is for commercial office use and therefore this criteria is not applicable. B A change in the ratio or number of different types of dwelling units; This project is for commercial office use and therefore this criteria is not applicable. C A change that requires additional on-site parking in accordance with Chapter 18.765; This modification to the project does not propose additional parking as the result of a requirement to add parking. Parking is being added for the benefit of future tenants. Even with the additional parking, the amount of parking provided, at 3.1/1000, is greater than the minimum and less than the maximum allowed by the City of Tigard. D A change in the type of commercial or industrial structures as defined by the Uniform Building Code; This modification to the project does not change the type of the structures proposed. E An increase in the height of the building(s)by more than 20%; This modification to the project does not change the height of the building(s) by more than 20%. F A change in the type and location of accessways and parking areas where off-site traffic would be affected; This modification to the project does not change the type and location of accessways and parking areas where off-site traffic would be affected. G An increase in vehicular traffic to and from the site and the increase can be expected to exceed 100 vehicles per day; This modification to the project does not increase vehicular traffic to and from the site and the increase does not exceed 100 vehicles per day. Narrative for Minor Modification March 11,2004 7155 Beveland Buildings Project Numberl03317 P:5103317\wpWarrativel.wpd Page 2 H An increase in the floor area proposed for a nonresidential use by more than 10%excluding expansions under 5,000 square feet; This modification to the project does not increase floor area by more than 10% nor exceed the allowable FAR for the site. I A reduction in the area reserved for common open space and/or usable open space which reduces the open space area below the minimum required by this code or reduces the open space area by more than 10%; This modification to the project does not reduce the area reserved for common open space. J A reduction of project amenities below the minimum established by this code or by more than 10% where specified in the site plan: a. Recreational facilities; b. Screening; and/or c. Landscaping provisions. This modification to the project does not reduce the project amenities below the minimum established by this code. K A modification to the conditions imposed at the time of site development review approval which are not the subject of B1 through 10 above of this subsection. This modification to the project does not require modification to the conditions imposed at the time of site development review approval.