Loading...
MMD2002-00028 MMD2002 00028 BONITA VILLA APARTMENTS CITY OF TIGARD October 24, 2002 OREGON Ellis Esuck Associates Attn: Charles Hagen 1230 SW 1st Avenue, Suite 300 Portland, OR 97204 RE: Bonita Villa Apartments Minor Modification Request, Case File No. MMD2002-00028 Dear Mr. Hagen: This letter is in response to your request for a Minor Modification (MMD2002-00028) of the existing Bonita Villa Apartment site development located at 7580 SW Boninta Road, WCTM 2S112BD, Tax Lot 100. Bonita Villas, previously "Tiffany Court Apartments" was developed in 1969 before the City of Tigard had a building department. The development was processed through Washington County, and no City records exist related to the original land use approval. As you have noted, there are several aspects of this project which are considered non- conforming, including the density of the project and the number of parking spaces. Non conforming development may continue so long as it remains otherwise lawful, and that any changes to the structures do not enlarge or alter the structure in a manner that increases the degree of the non conformity. The proposed modifications will not increase the number of units and the changes to the parking area will bring the non conforming parking spaces into conformance with current dimensional standards. The result of the parking lot changes will decrease the number of parking spaces (presently below the minimum number required); however, the City's position is that the present parking spaces are so substandard that they would not be considered as parking spaces for purposes of meeting the parking requirements. In other words, while the number of stalls will be decreased, the number of lawfully compliant parkign spaces will be increased from current conditions. The changes also reflect other current parkign standards with regard to ADA parking stalls, and access aisle widths. You have requested site modifications including restriping the parking lot to provide standard sized parking stalls as well as handicap accessible spaces, changing the on site circulation for vehicles and pedestrians, improving the accessibility of certain building entrances, and modifying the landscaping. The submitted site plans reflect the current conditions as well as the proposed modifications. 13125 SW Hall Blvd., Tigard, OR 97223 (503)639-4171 TDD (503)684-2772 �'" • Analysis of Modification Request: Section 18.360.060 of the Tigard Development Code Site Development Review chapter, states; "any modification which is not within the description of a major modification as provided in section 18.360.050 shall be considered a minor modification." Section 18.360.050 states that the Director shall determine that a major modification(s) has resulted if one (1) or more of the changes listed below have been proposed: 1. An increase in dwelling unit density or lot coverage for residential development. While this is a residential property, no increase to the non conforming dwelling unit density is proposed. Therefore, this standard is met. 2. A change in the ratio or number of different types of dwelling units. The dwelling unit mix will also not be changed by this request, as no changes to the apartment units themselves have been prposed. This standard is met. 3. A change that requires additional on-site parking in accordance with Chapter 18.765. The proposal includes eliminating some parking from certain areas in order to provide ADA handicap accessible parking stalls. As noted previously, this site is non conforming with respect to adequate parking; however, the changes will bring the parking spaces into compliance with dimensional standards. Changing the parking lot does not in and of itself require the additional parking spaces, but an increase in dwelling units or bedrooms would. Since no additional dwelling units or bedrooms are proposed, no additional parking is required by this change. This standard is met. 4. A change in the type of commercial or industrial structures as defined by the Uniform Building Code. No change in the structural occupancy type of the buildings is proposed. Therefore, this criterion is not applicable. 5. An increase in the height of the building(s) by more than 20 percent. The applicant has not proposed any changes to the existing building that will affect the height. Therefore, this standard is met. 6. A change in the type and location of accessways and parking areas where off-site traffic would be affected. This application does propose fairly substantial changes to parking lot layout, however, these changes are internal to the site and serve to facilitate better movement and parking through the site. The access points and cueing areas are unaffected by this proposal. Since off site traffic will not be affected, this standard is satisfied. 7. An increase in vehicular traffic to and from the site and the increase can be expected to exceed 100 vehicles per day. There is no change to the type or intensity of use proposed. The modification request is for site and landscaping improvements. This modification will not generate significant additional vehicle trips. Therefore, this criterion does not apply. 8. An increase in the floor areas proposed for a non-residential use by more than ten percent excluding expansions under 5,000 square feet. The proposal will not increase the square footage of the buildings. Therefore, this standard is met. 9. A reduction in the area reserved for common open space and/or usable open space that reduces the open space area below the minimum required by the code Page 2 of 3 or reduces the open space areas by more than ten percent. The proposal will enhance existing open space areas, and will not decrease the area devoted to open space. This standard is met. 10. A reduction of project amenities (recreational facilities, screening; and/or, landscaping provisions) below the minimum established by the code or by more than ten percent where specified in the site plan. The proposed modifications to the site will not reduce or eliminate project amenities. This project also seeks to improve disability access to several buildings on site. Recreational facilities, screening, and landscaping will not be detrimentally affected. Therefore this criterion is met. 11. A modification to the conditions imposed at the time of Site Development Review approval that is not the subject of criteria (B). 1 through 10 above. As the Bonita Villa Apartments were built prior to the City's Site Development Review Process, there are no prior conditions of approval that may be affected. This standard is met. THIS REQUEST HAS BEEN APPROVED BY THE PLANNING DEPARTMENT SUBJECT TO THE FOLLOWING LIMITATIONS. PLEASE SUBMIT A COPY OF THIS LETTER WITH YOUR BUILDING PERMIT APPLICATION. Limitations on Minor Modification Approval This approval is based on the plans and drawings submitted, as well as the statement provided by the applicant. Substantial deviation from these documents shall render this decision void. This request is determined to be a minor modification to an existing site. The Director's designee has determined that the proposed minor modification of this existing site will continue to promote the general welfare of the City and will not be significantly detrimental, nor injurious to surrounding properties provided that, development which occurs after this decision complies with all applicable local, state, and federal laws. If you need additional information or have any questions, please feel free to call me at (503) 639-4171 ext. 2428. Sincere) , .../1/&7.-4--- ZE-....> Morgan Tracy Associate Planner is\curpin\morgan\workspace\sdr\mmd2002-00028(bonita villa).doc Page 3 of 3 A MINOR MODIFICATION ` ?i TYPE I APPLICATION CITY OF TIGARD 13125 SW Hall Blvd., Tigard, OR 97223 (503) 639-4171 FAX: (503) 684-7297 GENERAL INFORMATION , , f Property AddresslLocation(s)-�S q2 0 C LA i � f�. Tax Map & Tax Lot#(s): 2 S 1 1 Z 1317 •C. JO( FOR STAFF USE ONLY )0114 122A2,- z 0 Site Size: Case No.(s): ! '/ '' Applicant*: A S 9 A f. A ter` Other Case No.(s): /�r - r� Address: -) �j 0 Si w V— lie/ �J D Receipt No.: =(1-r-'Z - Ti-I9 City/State: P Imi 4 d Zip: Application Accepted By: itin Primary Contact: 41111 hilMilma, aid /_l ii Date: ( C/ 3/C0-_., Phone: rl.�)-3 6q L 3 . ax: '1.-1 0 2 6/ Property Owner/Deed Holder(s)*: (Attach list if more than one) Date Determined Complete: /0/0/07. LOST a l'aV) c! r"Y {i �, V sauces Rev.7/22/2002 i:\curpin\masters\revised\minormod.mst Address: �L I� `�.__L O Jt v Phone: City/State:d(.us LD 72'r d K Zip: REQUIRED SUBMITTAL ELEMENTS * When the owner and the applicant are different people, the applicant (Note: applications will not be accepted must be the purchaser of record or a lessee in possession with written without the required submittal elements) authorization from the owner or an agent of the owner. The owner(s) must sign this application in the space provided on the back of this form or submit a written authorization with this application. ❑ Application Form PROPOSAL SUMMARY ❑ Owner's Signature/Written Authorization The owners of record of the subject property request permission for a ❑ Title Transfer Instrument or Deed Minor Modification. To review a modification as a Minor Modification, the Director must first find that the expansion does not ❑ Site Development Plan (3 copies) invoke one or more of the 11 criteria discussed within Section 18.120.070(B) of the Tigard Development Code. If the modification ❑ Site/Plot Plan (reduced 8'12"x 11") exceeds the maximum allowed under any one or more of the Applicant's Statement (3 copies) following criteria, a Major Modification review is required. Major pP ( p ) Modifications are processed in the same manner as a new Site (Addressing Criteria Under Section 18.360.050(B) Development Review. In a separate letter, please address the ❑ Filing Fee $435.00 criteria below contained in Section 18.360.050(B) including a detailed response to each criteria. I. An Increase in dwelling unit density or lot coverage for residential development. In addition, the Director must find that the 2. A change in the ratio or number of different types of dwelling units. proposed change complies with the underlying 3. A change that requires additional on-site parking in accordance with Chapter 18.165. standards of the applicable zoning district. To 4. A change in the type of commercial or industrial structures as defined by the Uniform Building Code. complete this review, the Applicant's proposal 5. An increase in the height of the building(s) by more than 20%. must include a discussion indicating how the 6. A change in the type and location of accessways and parking areas where off-site traffic would be site expansion will continue to comply with the affected. minimum setback, building height, parking land 1. An increase in vehicular traffic to and from the site and increase can be expected to exceed 100 landscaping standards. Other applicable vehicles per day. requirements such as minimum Clear Vision B. An increase in the poor area proposed for a non-residential use by more than 10% excluding areas near driveways and street intersections expansions under 5,000 square feet. may also be applicable depending on where 9. A reduction in the area reserved for common open space and/or usable open space that reduces the the building expansion is proposed to be open space area below the minimum required by this code or reduces the open space area by more constructed on the site. than ten percent. 10. A reduction of project amenities (recreational facilities, screening, and/or, landscaping provisions) below the minimum established by this code or by more than 10%where specified in the site plan. II. A modification to the conditions imposed at the time of Site Development Review approval that are not the subject of Criteria 1 through 10 above. . APPLICANTS: To consider an application complete, you will need to submit ALL of the REQUIRED SUBMITTAL ELEMENTS as described on the front of this application in the"Required Submittal Elements" box. (Detailed Submittal Requirement Information sheets can be obtained, upon request, for all types of Land Use Applications.) THE APPLICANT(S)SHALL CERTIFY THAT: • The above request does not violate any deed restrictions that may be attached to or imposed upon the subject property. • If the application is granted, the applicant will exercise the rights granted in accordance with the terms and subject to all the conditions and limitations of the approval. • All of the above statements and the statements in the plot plan, attachments, and exhibits transmitted herewith, are true; and the applicants so acknowledge that any permit issued, based on this application, may be revoked if it is found that any such statements are false. • The applicant has read the entire contents of the application, including the policies and criteria, and understands the requirements for approving or denying the application. SIGNATURES of each owner of the subject property. DATED this day of ,20 Owner's Signature Owner's Signature Owner's Signature Owner's Signature 2:51:40PM T I D E M A R K COMPUTER SYSTEMS. INC. Receipt #: 27200200000000003744 Date: 10/03/2002 Line Items: Case No Tran Code Description Revenue Account No Amount Paid MIS2002-00020 [LANDUS]Minor Modification 100-0000-438000 435.00 Line Item Total: $435.00 Payments: Method Payer Bank No Account No Confirm No How Received Amount Paid Check ELLIS ESLICK ASSOCIATES MAS 7118 In Person 435.00 Payment Total: $435.00 Page 1 of 1 cReceipt.rpt ELLIS, ESLICK ASSOCIATES/ARCHITECTS P.C. 1230 SW FIRST AVENUE,SUITE 300 ,- PORTLAND,OREGON 97204-3236 as 503.223.6963/FAX 503.294.0827 TO: City Of Tigard Date: October 2, 2002 Department of Planning cc: FROM: Charles Hagen ❑ FAXED, PAGES/ FAX NO.: ❑ MAILED ® MESSENGERED PROJECT: Bonita villa Apartments-Washington County Housing Services PROJECT NO.: 0024.70 SUBJECT: The addition of accessible parking spaces 18.360.60 Minor Modification (s) to Approved or Existing Development The proposed alteration to the site parking at the Bonita Villa Apartments is the addition of five accessible parking spaces ( one at each of the existing five buildings) with new sidewalks and curbs. This alteration does not affect the existing number of units. All new parking dimensions will be compliant with the City of Tigard municipal codes. Page of