Loading...
MMD2002-00027 MMD2002 00027 TIGARD OFFICE COMPLEX - MOBILE CAT SCAN UNIT CITY OF TIGARD October 2, 2002 OREGON Joseph Hughes Construction Attn: Mark Stolle 7035 SW Hampton Street Tigard, OR 97223 RE: Tigard Office Complex Minor Modification Request, Case File No. MMD2002-00027 Dear Mr. Stolle: This letter is in response to your request for a Minor Modification (MMD2002-00027) of the existing Tigard Office Complex site development located at 7100 SW Hampton Street, WCTM 2S101AC, Tax Lot 01600. You have requested to modify the approved site plan by displacing several parking spaces to accommodate a concrete pad suitable for placing a mobile cat scan unit. The submitted site plan reflects the current conditions as well as the proposed modifications. Analysis of Modification Request: Section 18.360.060 of the Tigard Development Code Site Development Review chapter, states; "any modification which is not within the description of a major modification as provided in section 18.360.050 shall be considered a minor modification." Section 18.360.050 states that the Director shall determine that a major modification(s) has resulted if one (1) or more of the changes listed below have been proposed: 1. An increase in dwelling unit density or lot coverage for residential development. The proposal does not involve residential property. Therefore, this standard does not apply. 2. A change in the ratio or number of different types of dwelling units. This criterion is not applicable, as this request does not involve a residential development. 3. A change that requires additional on-site parking in accordance with Chapter 18.765. The proposal includes eliminating some parking from one portion of the site. The present use of the property requires 2.7 spaces per 1,000 gross square feet. The building size is 78,000 square feet, thereby needing 211 parking spaces. There are presently 317 spaces, or a surplus of 106 spaces. By eliminating the 8 parking spaces the standard is still met. Therefore, additional on- site parking is not required. 4. A change in the type of commercial or industrial structures as defined by the Uniform Building Code. No change in the structural occupancy type of the buildings is proposed. Therefore, this criterion is not applicable. 5. An increase in the height of the building(s) by more than 20 percent. The applicant has not proposed any changes to the existing building that will affect the height. Therefore, this standard is met. 13125 SW Hall Blvd., Tigard, OR 97223 (503)639-4171 TDD (503)684-2772 '-!- • 6. A change in the type and location of accessways and parking areas where off-site traffic would be affected. This request will affect the location of eight parking spaces; however, these are surplus parking spaces and can be eliminated. No changes to the access points, driveway aisles, or location of remaining parking will result from this site modification. This standard is satisfied. 7. An increase in vehicular traffic to and from the site and the increase can be expected to exceed 100 vehicles per day. There is no change to the type or intensity of use proposed. The concrete pad will house a mobile CT cat scanner, and is not a permanent fixture. There should be an insignificant, if any, increase in traffic to and from the site as a result of this request. 8. An increase in the floor areas proposed for a non-residential use by more than ten percent excluding expansions under 5,000 square feet. The proposal will not increase the square footage of the building. Therefore, this standard is met. 9. A reduction in the area reserved for common open space and/or usable open space that reduces the open space area below the minimum required by the code or reduces the open space areas by more than ten percent. The proposal will replace surplus parking spaces with a concrete pad for a mobile cat scan machine. No open space will be affected by the proposal. 10. A reduction of project amenities (recreational facilities, screening; and/or, landscaping provisions) below the minimum established by the code or by more than ten percent where specified in the site plan. The proposed modifications to the site will not reduce or eliminate project amenities. Recreational facilities, screening, and landscaping will not be detrimentally affected. Therefore this criterion is met. 11. A modification to the conditions imposed at the time of Site Development Review approval that is not the subject of criteria (B). 1 through 10 above. This request will not affect compliance with any specific previous conditions of approval. THIS REQUEST HAS BEEN APPROVED BY THE PLANNING DEPARTMENT SUBJECT TO THE FOLLOWING LIMITATIONS. PLEASE SUBMIT A COPY OF THIS LETTER WITH YOUR BUILDING PERMIT APPLICATION. This request is determined to be a minor modification to an existing site. The Director's designee has determined that the proposed minor modification of this existing site will continue to promote the general welfare of the City and will not be significantly detrimental, nor injurious to surrounding properties provided that, development which occurs after this decision complies with all applicable local, state, and federal laws. If you need additional information or have any questions, please feel free to call me at (503) 639-4171 ext. 2428. Sincerely, /dt„,24 Morgan Tracy Associate Planner is\curpin\morgan\workspace\sdr\mmd2002-00027 (hampton concrete pad).doc Page 2 of 2 APPLICANT MATERIALS . , . MINOR MODIFICATION 1411 TYPE I APPLICATION CITY OF TIGARD 13125 SW Hall Blvd., Tigard, OR 97223 (503) 639-4171 FAX: (503) 684-7297 GENERAL INFORMATION Property Address/Location(s): /7Zoa r;c,-1 k"' ERr•_n 4.tr. FOR STAFF USE ONLY Tax Map &Tax Lot#(s): 2 S i U 1/1--c 1(f�C� Site Size: L{-66 Oj - Case No.(s): MPP2€OL'CVO Ll- 1/ Other Case No.(s): J Applicant*: , Af74 C 6�-/o//t Iis �sepA- llt�c�`13 �, Address: '7�13S— SLo r.5� f') Receipt No.: e01- -- 3696 City/State: Te,,2jT , Oro Zip: `9 72 2 3 Application Accepted By: RI< Primary Contact: , 4, ,t S/ /' — Date: 4,/=- -'-' Phone: 3 y. 7/Ce Fax: .� (,pe'.c)93— Property Owner/Deed Holder(s)*: (Attach list if more than one) Date Determined Complete: I 0/0L-102.- c Rev.7/22/2002 is\curpin\masters\revised\minormod.mst Address: ".'/co 1-4) A,-- Phone:S74.3 C."i.2r— 7..7 City/State: T 97r_r> , 1 Zip: (377 22-'3 REQUIRED SUBMITTAL ELEMENTS * When the owner and the applicant are different people, the applicant (Note: applications will not be accepted must be the purchaser of record or a lessee in possession with written without the required submittal elements) authorization from the owner or an agent of the owner. The owner(s) must sign this application in the space provided on the back of this form or submit a written authorization with this application. Er Application Form PROPOSAL SUMMARY ill Owner's Signature/Written Authorization The owners of record of the subject property request permission for a Title Transfer Instrument or Deed Minor Modification. To review a modification as a Minor Modification, the Director must first find that the expansion does not Ei Site Development Plan (3 copies) invoke one or more of the 11 criteria discussed within Section 18.120.070(B) of the Tigard Development Code. If the modification Ej Site/Plot Plan (reduced 8'/0"x 11") exceeds the maximum allowed under any one or more of the Applicant's Statement(3 copies) following criteria, a Major Modification review is required. Major Er Modifications are processed in the same manner as a new Site (Addressing Criteria Under Section 18.360.050(B) Development Review. In a separate letter, please address the Q Filing Fee $435.00 criteria below contained in Section 18.360.050(B) including a detailed response to each criteria. --t. An Increase in dwelling unit density or lot coverage for residential development. In addition, the Director must find that the ,--} A change in the ratio or number of different types of dwelling units. proposed change complies with the underlying 3. A change that requires additional on-site parking in accordance with Chapter 18.765. standards of the applicable zoning district. To 4. A change in the type of commercial or industrial structures as defined by the Uniform Building (ode. complete this review, the Applicant's proposal 5. An increase in the height of the building(s) by more than 20%°. must include a discussion indicating how the 6. A change in the type and location of accessways and parking areas where off-site traffic would be site expansion will continue to comply with the affected. minimum setback, building height, parking land 7. An increase in vehicular traffic to and from the site and increase can be expected to exceed 100 landscaping standards. Other applicable vehides per day. requirements such as minimum Clear Vision 8. An increase in the floor area proposed for a non-residential use by more than 10% exduding areas near driveways and street intersections expansions under 5,000 square feet. may also be applicable depending on where 9. A reduction in the area reserved for common open space and/or usable open space that reduces the the building expansion is proposed to be open space area below the minimum required by this code or reduces the open space area by more constructed on the site. than ten percent. 10. A reduction of project amenities (recreational facilities, screening, and/or, landscaping provisions) below the minimum established by this code or by more than 10% where specified in the site plan. I I. A modification to the conditions imposed at the time of Site Development Review approval that are not the subject of Criteria 1 through 10 above. . APPLICANTS: To consider an application complete, you will need to submit ALL of the REQUIRED SUBMITTAL ELEMENTS as described on the front of this application in the"Required Submittal Elements" box. (Detailed Submittal Requirement Information sheets can be obtained, upon request,for all types of Land Use Applications.) THE APPLICANT(S)SHALL CERTIFY THAT: • The above request does not violate any deed restrictions that may be attached to or imposed upon the subject property. • If the application is granted, the applicant will exercise the rights granted in accordance with the terms and subject to all the conditions and limitations of the approval. • All of the above statements and the statements in the plot plan, attachments, and exhibits transmitted herewith, are true; and the applicants so acknowledge that any permit issued, based on this application, may be revoked if it is found that any such statements are false. • The applicant has read the entire contents of the application, including the policies and criteria, and understands the requirements for approving or denying the application. SIGNATURES of each owner of the subject property. DATED this day of , 20 Owner's Signature Owner's Signature Owner's Signature Owner's Signature Sep. 27 02 03: 41p M slander Inv 51 796 1855' p. 2 " Fax:5036845295 Sep 27 2002 15:00 P.03 APPLICANTS: 1 To consider an application Complete, you will need to submit ALL of the REQUAEP cUPMIT LELEMENTI as described on the front of this application In the"RtgUirsd Submittal Elements"box. _ _ _ (Detailed Submittal Requirement information sheets can be obtained.upon request,for at types of Land Use Applications.) THE APPLICANT(S)SHALL CERTIFY THAT; • The/Mollie reguerd d0.l not yio►ate any deed resttictiofS that e_ Q att tiv ached to or mpQ0eQ uDan the aubiect property. • If the application Is granted, the applicant will exercise the rights granted in accordance with the terms and subject to all the conditions and limitations of the approval • All of the above statements and the statements in the plot plan, attachments.and exhibits transmitted herewith, are true: and the applicants so acknowledge that any permit issued. based on this application, may be revoked if it is found tnat any such statements are false. • The applicant he read the entire contents of the application, inducting the policies and criteria, and understands the requirements for approving or denying the application. SIGNATURES of catch owner of the subject property. DATED this 7 day of `/; '.. ...//ia I , 0 —� , / 4 i 11 IF • Cy/ner's Signatu, Owner's Signature Owner's Signature Owner's Signature 10:21:13AM .1". ____.—./00e—...• IDEMARK 'J' COMPUTER SYSTEMS. INC. Receipt #: 27200200000000003696 Date: 10/01/2002 Line Items: Case No Tran Code Description Revenue Account No Amount Paid MMD2002-00027 [LANDUS]Minor Modification 100-0000-438000 435.00 Line Item Total: $435.00 Payments: Method Payer Bank No Account No Confirm No How Received Amount Paid Check JOSEPH HUGHES CONST. MET 18478 In Person 435.00 Payment Total: $435.00 September 25, 2002 City of Tigard 13125 SW Hall Blvd. Tigard, OR 97223 Att: Brad Kilby Associate Planner RE: Minor Modification Type 1 Application Dear. Brad, ed450c.41nc 477 platy �, NRsi.C.ontt k pad- rf u. I`1ubIL, Cu'� Sc �n &q�,i'ip"'' nf-p�, Below is a list of my responses to addressing the criteria under section 18.360.050(B) 1. N/A 2. N/A 3. Code requires 2.7 parking spaces per 1000 sq ft of leaseable space. We have a total of 78,000 sq ft with 317 available parking spaces this gives us a ratio of 4.06 per 1000 sq ft. 4. N/A 5. N/A 6. N/A 7. Should be no change. This Mobile CT scanner trailer is not a permanent fixture. It will be moving on and off site as needed. 8. N/A 9. We are only reducing the parking by 8 spaces 10. N/A 11. N/A Thanks "14,/,;41,4 Mark Stolle Project Manager Joseph Hughes Construction • 1 �} �. 77tt- .. .1. {1 4..IR1.41vvN+T. ,. l .,.4,v.. 1, .•._k1177 _Fi I f f _.._. _ • /;Ii' 1 1111[M1CIN1:AGi.o.4111,I,,-HI.I rW It'11{l9h ;,,..i JI, �• �� •-- _ _ -^ -�. - ���--_,_�"1�11W�.= • _ � - _ 11 i3 5{, , J• WUM?FN•,Mlt tM,"Ri.pttll 19/1561Y11(� � rrr(r p i _ -/ .. - ra/ cd*"4*.;*x;,4,4, _;---_- `•+.� , ". 4'— .I'1 sw•P•W'x' 1.a Ln,r t '� •! r R' 4'I,•IS..;TS:..•::y..r 11 F 1_ rr n 4L. ,Iola fFWa1ww1� / i 3' I' '. r .�^ ti I V h 1tfM[�.0�' .:Y. J ; :� i • _ I 1,I, , _, I ' }} 1- r (�.•8 Vii. ! rii r .j•l li•�i. . _�• - � I t, `.r 11 , .,'({t e,.t. H,f♦• � ': ° 1 ,i•, - if i > 1 � h y 1`Y(j.Ni4A 'IC f ` ___ .ry-n3 tf I .,1�• i, 1 I 'llIl t •�i'•� r•�' - ' I 4:./.---; r - e Ca 1.,,,i',11.'4,1.:1; If. • • _ I I !I L- ,`I I i 1 t • it .I'..•__\ - `L �_ .__.- I, A-r1 t •_I. 1 ,• :5'4 `I.' II i ■ 1_�• I. :Lnm.,,,r, -•''1, .!,1 -a.f�• ` '� III ' s I- { *' 'I.` 1\. -� efH•aTil.•• `-■` N\ _ _ • ._ _.I Y" t +qe� IYI. IIII Y '11/ .... _ 'k .=.•- , f..11,1±1.... I N _. - _.— I' ."< Tam .'. j.r� .itf i. .,Y r...r•r- u....o 1 , I._..._ l__-I— .: _f,i•eArn tC�r.•IS ..� {/ �� 11 •.4'.R.•I,. •I•, r Isa 1 1 TI:�a-1 I TTlnl I 1 J:�;:- �'�, (1 .. • .__-.r 1 rtr.lelx tiva. \ : , ?" .5•�ki, y � � ,' ._ I - S :'• SxR I .' ! I - I...It,O .La1 �.:r, 1 —. t 1�_ ' :' !_1 L I1{I , , , ; ,, , Is SSx!a' I �•1 I-I I r I 1 I ' G''. .r'16.F_ Ptf_'E•TyF 'J:ll_I'Ir7LN 13 F {{ -- ! ■ .'j,.. .,a-: 1_-!-II T'&i_CU-1TI-.-1- _ -"- -Z-. rii;' .. 1 ..; 111 II{ - \ \ . • (` '\. - I r 1 ( III I IJ I • ■I I i;l:_i:.r 'i 1.• .•.i-r.\ .• dk—r�~ ♦�I , 1 v .rna `per'. , t.:.f1 - - I , I !�Il ! 1 I I I`I.l l l R,J-..-1.,...........C i•111 � �" �, .t R?:> :}Y.:... 1_UI III ME r�r SCHEDULE ......t..._- �:..f..:_ , '-1 - -vkisti. -..• : /•,;]>41Yf 0.,.,,,,,F„...,,,,„. wRp p -'c.,5".l ,. .:!i «. ._wry. ps-.t<i-..�:T } •LL eA.}�y i G.t1.l.r c :. tic• — :r:---"-•.,..__. __ .. • f " .�•{� 1 i��6SYC� • !- .. .. .. ,,1;�. 1-4•.3..... S.Oh , . 1 .. / \• ..... '7G "'•'+Iff I-1•i :F 1;ii' 1 1-Y,' 1.1 MP1 r:M, u,...C.74-• •T-M1ty3iy�!.'.- • •t -- ' ' . ' ' n ' }1�' .�lu..li..,.{, _.1 v.,.. av�..:-{(4. 1•�'.:e ...: '\ 1 e1tyN►. c•-....,,.y ,. 1 Y 1,.. '•. _ • FW2R L.ip- [ t(T:..a• 1 i, .. MNI,.•.;---...`•.-,if'Y.I' 4fF!.:A S-I 11r lI1 • • G Sri: 1r d. :.t rt i r, iyit•: v.- •1.•4'11• :F .__.—. ._.. (eA# . <1• I.ivw ,,•e.;• f•!`•7..NV.1it-: 1:7Z.V. rl. _ 1 _.,,1 iai:wT(; I .ht _ II.'•:' . :. •\ \ `� - .. .. •..•,.\ \!!;':;.-...;•;•',:::••,h„,., t Fir y " • ---'-"- , -_ �„,,�t _ - , ...�• 1. ISr•iJ• t-IC .. • - - ”. -. _ *!.;M1:. t 1. y .yt ew=. , -- `1.- ' - .' h1-3.,.A.y,IQ i- ,w:: , .. r. !...I VA:,x.04 Ap.5140-, Ft(44 s7• I I .—..—._-...___:_„Iii.Cly� ( UIh'«:iV1?6 .E:1 14"• -_. r w:133W I �.�. • SITE PLAN TIGARD OFFICE COMPLEX ;°�,'sY'' °, (. i; • •