MMD1999-00018 MMD1999 00018
VINTAGE CORNER
CLASSICS
November 18, 1999 sait-
Kelly Koch CITY OF TIGARD
DBA: Vintage Corner Classics OREGON
13565 SW Pacific Highway
Tigard, OR 97223
Dear Mr. Koch:
This letter is in response to your request for Minor Modification (MMD1999-00018) approval to
construct a 480 square foot accessory structure located at 13555 SW Pacific Highway.
This property is designated for General Commercial (C-G) located within the C-G zoning district.
The use of the site is listed as a permitted use for this zoning district. The Tigard Community
Development Code, Site Development Review Section, states; "if the requested modification
meets any of the major modification criteria, that the request shall be reviewed as a new Site
Development Review application."
Section 18.330.020.B.2 states that the Director shall determine that a major modification(s) has
resulted if one (1) or more of the changes listed below have been proposed:
1. An increase in dwelling unit density or lot coverage for residential development.
The proposal does not involve residential property. Therefore, this standard does not
apply.
2. A change in the ratio or number of different types of dwelling units. This criterion is
not applicable, as this request does not involve a residential development.
3. A change that requires additional on-site parking in accordance with Chapter
18.765. No additional parking is needed. Currently, there are 12 parking spaces, which
is sufficient for this building. Therefore, this criterion does not apply.
4. A change in the type of commercial or industrial structures as defined by the
Uniform Building Code. No change in the structural occupancy type of the building is
proposed. Therefore, this criterion is not applicable.
5. An increase in the height of the building(s) by more than 20 percent. No increase in
the height of the existing building is proposed. Therefore, this standard does not apply.
6. A change in the type and location of accessways and parking areas where off-site
traffic would be affected. This request will not require a change in accessways or
parking areas where off-site traffic would be affected. Therefore, this criterion does not
apply.
7. An increase in vehicular traffic to and from the site and the increase can be
expected to exceed 100 vehicles per day. This modification will not generate
additional vehicle trips. Therefore, this criterion does not apply.
13125 SW Hall Blvd., Tigard, OR 97223 (503)639-4171 TDD (503)684-2772 --• •
•
8. An increase in the floor areas proposed for a non-residential use by more than ten
percent excluding expansions under 5,000 square feet. There is no expansion
proposed to the floor area, therefore, this criterion does not apply.
9. A reduction in the area reserved for common open space and/or usable open
space that reduces the open space area below the minimum required by the code
or reduces the open space areas by more than ten percent. There is no area
reserved for common open space, therefore, this standard does not apply.
10. A reduction of project amenities (recreational facilities, screening; and/or,
landscaping provisions) below the minimum established by the code or by more
than ten percent where specified in the site plan. No changes of project amenities
are planned. Therefore, this criterion does not apply.
11. A modification to the conditions imposed at the time of Site Development Review
approval that is not the subject of criteria (B). 1 through 10 above. Staff has
confirmed that the modification will not preclude conformance to the original Site
Development Review's Conditions of approval. Therefore, this criterion is satisfied.
THIS REQUEST HAS BEEN APPROVED SUBJECT TO THE FOLLOWING CONDITION:
1. A building permit must be obtained for the proposed accessory structure. Please
submit a copy of this letter when applying for permits.
This request is determined to be a minor modification to an existing site. The Director's designee
has determined that the proposed minor modification of this existing site will continue to promote
the general welfare of the City and will not be significantly detrimental, nor injurious to surrounding
properties provided that, development which occurs after this decision complies with all applicable
local, state, and federal laws.
If you need additional information or have any questions, please feel free to call me at
(503) 639-4171 ext. 317.
Sin •rely,/
/ 4 dat/...rfoldiv*._Mathew Scheidegger
Assistant Planner
is\cu rpl\Mathew\minmod\1999-00018
c: 1999 Planning correspondence file
MMD1999-00018 Land use file
11/18/1999 Kelly Koch/DBA: Vintage Corner Cassics Page 2 of 2
Re: Minor Modification (MMD1999-00018)Approval
for a 480 sq. ft. Accessory Structure @ 13555 SW Pacific Hwy.
2 5/0 Z CC- — RECL.4 ED -4/- MM�.
eo 6
• C'f F�4,4,14 _ NOV 0 51999 - ----
_ COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT
n
WO s8 fro _ &, .LC., grot 5siObtAGC L i- .
or Lo ,L L 4._ c-9 _ , c 6i c4-o,r e
✓t C d h�t.�� +�I.�V Nt
i4 k 12-x_ '
S1_ o t fS Ot 9 XI" i
_LAD` Se_A-,-gyp — c u5c
QAv ��`�—e, ,— c.�PLC._. L. A
t.,.%bo o 1-4 v.�G��� w -�� ,4
EQ... 4:7- r CAL. K �1 ` �r , '4ry > • k
f
MEMORANDUM
CITY OF TIGARD
TO: Property Owners, Builders and Developers
FROM: Planning Division
DATE: November 26, 1998
SUBJECT: SITE DEVELOPMENT REVIEW MODIFICATION PROCEDURES
The Community Development Code permits the Director to approve, approve with Conditions or deny
expansions to existing permitted uses. The Planning Division requires two sets of architectural
elevations, site and landscape plans. The cost for this type of review is $100. To review a
modification as a Minor Modification, the Director must first find that the expansion does not invoke
one or more of the 11 criteria discussed within Section 18.360.050(B) of the Tigard Development
Code. If the modification exceeds the maximum allowed under any one or more of the
following criteria, a Major Modification review is required. Major Modifications are processed
in the same manner as a new Site Development Review.
Below is a list of the criteria in Section 18.360.050(B) including an example of a response to each. To be
considered a complete application, a Minor Modification request must provide detailed answers to each
of the following code criteria:
1.N./ An increase in dwelling unit density or lot coverage for residential development. The
proposal does not involve a residential development, therefore, this standard does not apply.
2k, A change in the ratio or number of different types of dwelling units. This criterion is not
(\ applicable, as this request does not involve a residential development.
3. A change that requires additional on-site parking in accordance with Chapter 18.765. The
,f\o required parking for this use is one space per square feet of gross floor area. With
s the addition of square feet, the building will equal square feet. Therefore,
parking spaces are required for the project. The plans indicate as total of parking
spaces will be provided with the project, in compliance with the minimum standard.
4. A change in the type of commercial or industrial structures as defined by the Uniform
1 Building Code. No change in the str ral occupancy type of the building is proposed.
t;
Therefore, this criteria is not applicable.
5. An increase in the height of the building(s) by more than 20 percent. No increase in the
n c height of the existing building is proposed. The proposed expansion will match the height of the
4 existing building, thereby, satisfying this criteria.
MINOR MODIFICATION TO SDR PROCEDURES PAGE 1 OF 2
6. A change in the type and location of accessways and parking areas where off-site traffic
P` would be affected. This request will not require a change in accessways or parking areas
• where off-site traffic would be affected. In compliance with this criteria.
7. An increase in vehicular traffic to and from the site and the increase can be expected to
exceed 100 vehicles per day. The Minor Modification submittal included a trip generation
N study. The consulting traffic engineer determined the expected number of new trips to the site
sr based on the trip generation rates of the current edition of the Traffic Engineering Manual.
Based on this study, the applicant states that the proposed expansion will not generate or
exceed 100 additional vehicle trips to the site each day. Staff concurs with these findings.
NOTE: A traffic generation study may be necessary, but is not required in every case. Please discuss this with the staff assigned to the
project for a determination.
81,‘, An increase in the floor area proposed for a non-residential use by more than ten percent
o excluding expansions under 5,000 square feet. The modification will increase the floor area
\\° from square feet to square feet. The net increase is a total of
square feet or %, therefore, this standard has been satisfied.
9. A reduction in the area reserved for common open space and/or usable open space that
to reduces the open space area below the minimum required by this code or reduces the
(\
"41 open space area by more than ten percent. There is no area reserved for common open
space, therefore, this standard does not apply to the proposal.
10. A reduction of project amenities (recreational facilities, screening; and/or, landscaping
provisions) below the minimum established by this code or by more than ten percent
•�c, �vN where specified in the site plan. The proposed building addition will result in the removal of
'c i1.A some landscaping, however, the proposal also involves the reduction of parking spaces that will
CC ' be replaced with landscaping. The applicant has demonstrated how the site will continue to
nr k`' provide the required 15% landscaping in the information submitted. Prior to final occupancy, the
,r �- applicant must verify that 15% landscaping is being maintained.
11. A modification to the conditions imposed at the time of Site Development Review
approval that are not the subject of criteria 1 through 10 above. The applicant has provided
�0 findings that demonstrate the modification will not preclude conformance to the original Site
Development Review's Conditions of Approval, satisfying this criteria.
Secondly, the Director must find that the proposed change complies with the underlying standards of the
applicable zoning district. To complete this review, the Applicant's proposal must include a discussion
indicating how the site expansion will continue to comply with minimum setback, building height, parking
and landscaping standards. Other applicable requirements such as minimum Clear Vision areas near
driveways and street intersections may also be applicable depending on where the building expansion is
proposed to be constructed on the site.
Depending on the Planning Division's o load, a in& Modification request can typically be reviewed
within two calendar weeks. Upon re `ew of the req est, Planning Division Staff will issue a decision to
the applicant by letter.
i:\curpin\masterslrevised\minormOd.sdr It# _v
11/26/98
MINOR MODIFICATION TO SOR PROCEDURES PAGE 2 OF 2
The sketch below is made sc for the purpose of assisting in locating -I premises and
the company assumes no .. ...0iIity for variations, if any, in dimens. •s:and location
ascertained by actual survey. •
TICOR TITLE INSURANCE _• - �,
' 4\---- , /
/ /
• i / ti
/..,1'
�' / y
IC / •
c v
/ / ;
� °
SEE MAP • �� ii,"'
2S 12CB
0
\ 00 : C,. /y°
\ : Q
0
/
4'1
Q' q. /?
S.C.CO!'HER /
D.L.C.37 Alp•
701 ; • .p" ,, 0• , . . / 0 / 500 4 67,
.38 Ac. / ./•Ac. :• d4,5, .0, 00 / 44q. / 4.Z3Ac.
^ V. O
30•*
I F�\ \\ 60/,,,
• ° 70a, f� / n
.89 AC. ' /°' /
. / /
1 �'y� /
1 I2 FOe,'� < CJ / MD
ti °�'801
P ' � � / .69Ac. s°I°* • 23 - �
. 0 /
., � / ?Ob
. 3./i 901 ti
s °f.
■
/ ,42Ac. '>,' ,
/ 4
A /
cv
SEE MAP
2S I 3DD /' �o
'
�
1000 'r / S. ` .47Ac.
T9° 800 „°►
1,98Ac S ;4.+a N 2.32 Ac.
N
VE. ,N N
N ,
cr
h .9
'° 1100 • 4
`°� 4; 109Ac jock
J.
0 Jr.
00 `°j d�
•1 f•
1200 4'Jr. '0,� °.°.,.
.* .6.'.A c y w
r
`t- '
Ltil>
D
63-
1
Cl
r n l
i `b 0 o 1O C
44 '
I,. _ ,....._._.________________y:s/ A77-- ; t...../3-4( - <-----.>
Q3 9 F' eD t , , :I f -
,r-
K
/ 1
E?
,(( rc
<-.-- ,, ..„---------
: 1 f 1 1 T '
___,______ • 1 ( r 1
1.1.---i- a ' '