MMD2000-00008 MMD2000 00008
UNDER WATER
WORKS
May 9, 2000
IX4k
Hilde Frey CITY OF TIGARD
Under Water Works OREGON
12170 SW Main St.
Tigard, OR 97223
Dear Ms. Frey:
This letter is in response to your request for Minor Modification (MMD2000-00008) approval to
add on a 588 square foot expansion area to a 2,540 square foot building located at 12170 SW
Main Street giving the site a total of 3,128 square feet.
This property is designated for Central Business District (CBD) within the CBD zoning district.
The use of the site is listed as a permitted use for this zoning district. The Tigard Community
Development Code, Site Development Review Section, states; "if the requested modification
meets any of the major modification criteria, that the request shall be reviewed as a new Site
Development Review application."
Section 18.360.050.B. states that the Director shall determine that a major modification(s) has
resulted if one (1) or more of the changes listed below have been proposed:
1. An increase in dwelling unit density or lot coverage for residential development.
The proposal does not involve residential property. Therefore, this standard does not
apply.
2. A change in the ratio or number of different types of dwelling units. This criterion is
not applicable, as this request does not involve a residential development.
3. A change that requires additional on-site parking in accordance with Chapter
18.765. The required parking for this use is 3.7 spaces per 1000 square feet. The new
addition is 588 square feet. The new addition will displace 3-parking spaces. Including
the proposed modification, the total gross square footage for all buildings is 3,128 square
feet. There are currently 18-parking spaces available. The minimum amount of parking
spaces required for this use is 11-spaces and reducing the amount of parking from 18 to
15 still exceeds the minimum requirement. Therefore, this criterion has been met.
4. A change in the type of commercial or industrial structures as defined by the
Uniform Building Code. No change in the structural occupancy type of the existing
buildings is proposed. Therefore, this criterion does not apply.
5. An increase in the height of the building(s) by more than 20 percent. . No increase
in the height of the existing buildings is proposed. The height of the proposed structure
is less than the existing 25-foot high building. Therefore, this standard does not apply.
6. A change in the type and location of accessways and parking areas where off-site
traffic would be affected. This request will not require a change in accessways or
parking areas where off-site traffic would be affected. Therefore, this criterion does not
apply.
Page 1 of 2
13125 SW Hall Blvd., Tigard, OR 97223 (503) 639-4171 TDD (503)684-2772
7. An increase in vehicular traffic to and from the site and the increase can be
expected to exceed 100 vehicles per day. No change in traffic to and from the site can
be expected. The proposed modification will be used to display merchandise and
conduct meetings for guided tours. Therefore, this standard does not apply.
8. An increase in the floor areas proposed for a non-residential use by more than ten
percent excluding expansions under 5,000 square feet. The modification is less than
5,000 square feet. The proposed structure is only 588 square feet. Therefore, this
criterion does not apply.
9. A reduction in the area reserved for common open space and/or usable open
space that reduces the open space area below the minimum required by the code
or reduces the open space areas by more than ten percent. There is no area
reserved for common open space; therefore, this standard does not apply.
10. A reduction of project amenities (recreational facilities, screening; and/or,
landscaping provisions) below the minimum established by the code or by more
than ten percent where specified in the site plan. The additional 588 square foot
building will not reduce any project amenities associated with the site. The addition is on
the south side of the building adjacent to an existing parking lot. Therefore, this standard
does not apply.
11. A modification to the conditions imposed at the time of Site Development Review
approval that is not the subject of criteria (B). 1 through 10 above. None of the
proposed modifications have altered the original conditions set forth in the original
approval. Therefore, this standard has been met.
This request is determined to be a minor modification to an existing site. The Director's designee
has determined that the proposed minor modification of this existing site will continue to promote
the general welfare of the City and will not be significantly detrimental, nor injurious to surrounding
properties provided that, development which occurs after this decision complies with all applicable
local, state, and federal laws.
If you need additional information or have any questions, please feel free to call me at
(503) 639-4171 ext. 317.
Sincerely,
Mathew Scheidegger
Assistant Planner
is\curpl\Mathew\minmod12000-00008
c: MMD2000-00008 Land Use file
Under WaterMinor Mod/MMD2000-00008 Page 2 of 2
Re: MMD approval to place a 588 sq. ft addition located at 12170 SW Main Street.
APPLICANT
MATERIALS
MINOR MODIFICATION
,,mot �.1'�+ TYPE I APPLICATION
CITY OF TIGARD 13125 SW Hall Blvd., Tigard, OR 97223(503) 639-4171 FAX: (503) 684-7297
(96--0I -LCCO V\tl"t/C7
GENERAL INFORMATION
PRE-APP. HELD WITH:
DATE OF PRE-APP.:
Property Address/Location(s): /27 7l 4/P 7G1 j
Tax Map & Tax Lot#(s): Z`l 2f}fre - Z'b
FOR STAFF USE ONLY
Site Size: X / d
Property Owner/Deed Holder(s)*: Lk-7 /zE/y
Address: , r/2i 4.I/)jJ .6-T_ Phone:
City: I /4---h929' G%y2i Zip: 9'7.z_ Z 3 Case No.(s):
Applicant*: 77,44/ 4.4
Address: � /V .ate�,� r > Phone:Zi / Other Case No.(s):
City: f'cea ii', D/z Zip: y77vz Receipt No.:
* When the owner and the applicant are different people, the applicant Application Accepted By: �. �,r
must be the purchaser of record or a lessee in possession with written Date:
authorization from the owner or an agent of the owner. The owner(s)
must sign this application in the space provided on the back of this
form or submit a written authorization with this application. Date Determined To Be Complete:
PROPOSAL SUMMARY
The owners of record of the subject property request permission for a Comp Plan/Zone Designation:
Minor Modification. To review a modification as a Minor
Modification, the Director must first find that the expansion does not
invoke one or more of the 11 criteria discussed within Section
18.120.070(B) of the Tigard Development Code. If the modification CIT Area:
exceeds the maximum allowed under any one or more of the
following criteria, a Major Modification review is required. Major Recording Date and Number:
Modifications are processed in the same manner as a new Site
Development Review. In a separate letter, please address the
criteria below contained in Section 18.360.050(B) including a detailed Rev2/7/00 is\curpinlmasterslminormod.mst
response to each criteria.
I. An Increase in dwelling unit density or lot coverage for residential development.
2. A change in the ratio or number of different types of dwelling units.
3. A change that requires additional on-site parking in accordance with Chapter 18.165. REQUIRED SUBMITTAL ELEMENTS
4. A change in the type of commercial or industrial structures as defined by the Uniform Building Code.
5. An increase in the height of the building(s)by more than 20%.
6. A change in the type and location of accessways and parking areas where off-site traffic would be affected.
1. An increase in vehicular traffic to and from the site and increase can be expected to exceed 100 vehides per day. ✓ Application Elements Submitted:
8. An increase in the floor area proposed for a non-residential use by more than I exduding expansions under Application Form
5,000 square feet. pp
9. A reduction in the area reserved for common open space and/or usable open space that reduces the open space Er Owner's Signature/Written Authorization
area below the minimum required by this code or reduces the open space area by more than ten percent.
10. A reduction of project amenities (recreational facilities, screening, and/or, landscaping provisions) below the l Title Transfer Instrument or Deed
minimum established by this code or by more than 10%where specified in the site plan. Site Development Plan (3 copies)
I i. A modification to the conditions imposed at the time of Site Development Review approval that are not the
subject of Criteria I through 10 above. Q' Site/Plot Plan (reduced 8'10"x 11")
In addition, the Director must find that the proposed change complies Rr Applicant's Statement
with the underlying standards of the applicable zoning district. To (Addressing Criteria Under Section 18.360.050(B)
complete this review, the Applicant's proposal must include a
discussion indicating how the site expansion will continue to comply 0 Filing Fee $100.00
with the minimum setback, building height, parking land landscaping
standards. Other applicable requirements such as minimum Clear
Vision areas near driveways and street intersections may also be
applicable depending on where the building expansion is proposed to
be constructed on the site.
1
APPLICANTS:
To consider an application complete, you will need to submit ALL of the REQUIRED SUBMITTAL ELEMENTS as
described on the front of this application in the "Required Submittal Elements" box.
(Detailed Submittal Requirement Information sheets can be obtained, upon request, for all types of Land Use Applications.)
THE APPLICANT(S) SHALL CERTIFY THAT:
• The above request does not violate any deed restrictions that may be attached to or imposed upon the subject
property.
• If the application is granted, the applicant will exercise the rights granted in accordance with the terms and subject to all
the conditions and limitations of the approval.
• All of the above statements and the statements in the plot plan, attachments, and exhibits transmitted herewith, are true;
and the applicants so acknowledge that any permit issued, based on this application, may be revoked if it is found that
any such statements are false.
• The applicant has read the entire contents of the application, including the policies and criteria, and understands the
requirements for approving or denying the application.
SIGNATURES of each owner of the subject property.
DATED this day of , 19
Owner's Signature Owner's Signature
Owner's Signature Owner's Signature
2
Customer Receipt
CITY OF TIGARD Printed:05/01/2000 11:00
User: front
•
Station: 02
Operator: BON
Rcpt No: 0001792 Date: 05/01/2000
Customer No:000000 Amount Due: 100.00
Name: UNDER WATER WORKS INC Cash: 0.00
Address: 12170 SW MAIN ST Check: 100.00
TIGARD, OR 97223 N/A 0.00
Change: 0.00
Type Description Amount
LANDUS Land Use Applications 100.00
�,r Q
•
ci* si„c144.4,1„,r5t_
•
•
1
4.O elt
MEMORANDUM
CITY OF TIGARD
TO: Property Owners, Builders and Developers
FROM: Planning Division
DATE: November 26, 1998
SUBJECT: SITE DEVELOPMENT REVIEW MODIFICATION PROCEDURES
The Community Development Code permits the Director to approve, approve with Conditions or deny
expansions to existing permitted uses. The Planning Division requires two sets of architectural
elevations, site and landscape plans. The cost for this type of review is $100. To review a
modification as a Minor Modification, the Director must first find that the expansion does not invoke
one or more of the 11 criteria discussed within Section 18.360.050(B) of the Tigard Development
Code. If the modification exceeds the maximum allowed under any one or more of the
following criteria, a Major Modification review is required. Major Modifications are processed
in the same manner as a new Site Development Review.
Below is a list of the criteria in Section 18.360.050(B) including an example of a response to each. To be
considered a complete application, a Minor Modification request must provide detailed answers to each
of the following code criteria:
1. An increase in dwelling unit density or lot coverage for residential development. The
proposal does not involve a residential development, therefore, this standard does not apply.
2. A change in the ratio or number of different types of dwelling units. This criterion is not
applicable, as this request does not involve a residential development.
3. A change that requires additional on-site parking in accordance with Chapter 18.765. The
required parking for this use is one space per square feet of gross floor area. With
the addition of 4"c:58 square feet, the building will equal 2 9fP square feet. Therefore,
parking spaces are required for the project. The plans indicate a total of parking
spaces will be provided with the project, in compliance with the minimum standard.
4. A change in the type of commercial or industrial structures as defined by the Uniform
Building Code. No change in the structural occupancy type of the building is proposed.
Therefore, this criteria is not applicable.
5. An increase in the height of the building(s) by more than 20 percent. No increase in the
height of the existing building is proposed. The proposed expansion will match the height of the
existing building, thereby, satisfying this criteria.
MINOR MODIFICATION TO SDR PROCEDURES PAGE 1 OF 2
6. A change in the type and location of accessways and parking areas where off-site traffic
would be affected. This request will not require a change in accessways or parking areas
where off-site traffic would be affected. In compliance with this criteria.
7. An increase in vehicular traffic to and from the site and the increase can be expected to
exceed 100 vehicles per day. The Minor Modification submittal included a trip generation
study. The consulting traffic engineer determined the expected number of new trips to the site
based on the trip generation rates of the current edition of the Traffic Engineering Manual.
Based on this study, the applicant states that the proposed expansion will not generate or
exceed 100 additional vehicle trips to the site each day. Staff concurs with these findings.
NOTE: A traffic generation study may be necessary, but is not required in every case. Please discuss this with the staff assigned to the
project for a determination.
8. An increase in the floor area proposed for a non-residential use by more than ten percent
excluding expansions under 5,000 square feet. The modification will increase the floor area
from square feet to 3/8 square feet. The net increase is a total of 1�
square feet or %, therefore, this standard has been satisfied.
9. A reduction in the area reserved for common open space and/or usable open space that
reduces the open space area below the minimum required by this code or reduces the
open space area by more than ten percent. There is no area reserved for common open
space, therefore, this standard does not apply to the proposal.
10. A reduction of project amenities (recreational facilities, screening; and/or, landscaping
provisions) below the minimum established by this code or by more than ten percent
where specified in the site plan. The proposed building addition will result in the removal of
some landscaping, however, the proposal also involves the reduction of parking spaces that will
be replaced with landscaping. The applicant has demonstrated how the site will continue to
provide the required 15% landscaping in the information submitted. Prior to final occupancy, the
applicant must verify that 15% landscaping is being maintained.
11. A modification to the conditions imposed at the time of Site Development Review
approval that are not the subject of criteria 1 through 10 above. The applicant has provided
findings that demonstrate the modification will not preclude conformance to the original Site
Development Review's Conditions of Approval, satisfying this criteria.
Secondly, the Director must find that the proposed change complies with the underlying standards of the
applicable zoning district. To complete this review, the Applicant's proposal must include a discussion
indicating how the site expansion will continue to comply with minimum setback, building height, parking
and landscaping standards. Other applicable requirements such as minimum Clear Vision areas near
driveways and street intersections may also be applicable depending on where the building expansion is
proposed to be constructed on the site.
Depending on the Planning Division's work load, a Minor Modification request can typically be reviewed
within two calendar weeks. Upon review of the request, Planning Division Staff will issue a decision to
the applicant by letter.
i:1cu rpl n\masterslrevised\minormod.sd r
11/26/98
MINOR MODIFICATION TO SDR PROCEDURES PAGE 2 OF 2
FlINELL PLAN SERVICE
4405 N . E . 66 Avenue Portland , OR 97218 284 - 5205
. .Y 1.. , ".�v
alty of Tigard
13125 S .4 . Hall Boulevard
Tigard , OR 97223
To : Planning Division
Re : Building addition at 12170 Main Street
Required Submittal Elements
1 . Being a commercial unit this does not apply
2 . same as No 1
3 . No change required in additional parking
4. No change in type of construction as addition is of same design
5 . Height of addition is lower than existing
6 . No change in access or parking areas
7 . No change in traffic to and from site can be expected
8 . Increase in floor area is small - 538 sq. feet
9 . The small addition will not reduce open area by more than 10%
10 . No project elements will be reduced by construction of this addition
11 . No modification of any conditions that are existing wiil be altered
•
P2o,• .'N5 8020.
:f1)
a�-d „ --- -
�r (-(I
e"x/5Sr/Nc 5T/zL Cru, 'C=1
_
do
6 £ 7$TANG
r► A ,fj; / N
r1 - PR DP. /NO 8' -
/.920A. G /NE' 8O O
\O
6/y ,�
• e'x/5-TrNG s TR JC TU�L_
V
EX'LS TI NG_
�i► C °
0
�►
PROP. 4/NE ee-'o
> _ — f'2HIV• G /Ne 80-0
\Q
b 60,1 „
® - - -
,Q /5-r/NG 5 r uc Tu,.C::
q
38=6"
EX/5 Tl NG_
\ \
p _ Pieb/? 4 ENE 80-'0
•
\. . ' \ <(>4 / 1:,....„))9...,.....--\-- .894c. \ `.
1 11
/� 6 2�X /� ° • w 905 \
r 2 .34 AC. ri i' 10 \
P v
� 5 ti ob \� a o
s o x _ s ps
�( / �G .6�0 1
oti 603 \
YS / .9, 904 ,.
e_ 2.33 AC g 2. .954c.\
25 - ••fi
�!<j 3 • 86.55 2128 h'' `rt 1
X 24 \ • `C' — R`�B�Z • I' .6 s 1
5100 9 s
•� a� �s• -4
.12 AC
e �� y /
o.•` 23 ,y xJ ti6. A 903 906 9s
\ o Q.
`' 2 s\ �,M .434c. 2.42 AC, 9,
ag. 5,200 s ;y�' 1.1 4
2 I .10 AC. �� 1 " '
vs.
� ' X — 11 ''s .pig / / p /\ y I r
�v► 1 1 s /R r J ___,
0 2301 sp 1 / \\
/ .43 Ac 9O 1 1 /
f
�� F_-) ,. I r
gyp;— c.°0 1 '1 , 5 0 p\ J\J `J
1\P ._ 2302 'a3, 11 p9
.26 Ac r 1 2 S's
(C.a•NO.12264) (CS.NoJ2263) T
r' ` ti 40° 9s S� 1 1 s9 C iN J r T
4000 Q ohs °° 2300 •4 2400 ss 1 1 .. s/6'.
/804c. /7Ac a1` 22 Ac. a�•
��23 2°0 3 " S ee C.5.10734 1 1 %o 4
`°° 25 o° `°o /00 1 1 /
v • S�, i \ `OP
\\ 2 °° so '' 250-p v�\% o .4 ti '0 4 1 Q
\ C' 52Ac.� `' \° .°°t. 4s°•o ° �A., 1� �,
\ I '9�S� \ ga' 2 600`',*. / ICS t 3°so
po \7 r 4';-:;: ,\• `,`o .22Ac. / '•,o, /Y_(1 1 1 �� /.10`.'5'T s
1 �c o \` �„• ` 1 yam, s 1090-56237 NT // V 1 1 Ra _y6� 901 'a s
\ y \°O a°' 4... / // ,1,9 '°° , 1 v .37 AC.
1, O ?• 40 / so9
• S42°52'W 1559.•I a6g \�. / 2800 /a� ,` �. 3 t..‘
,
' .P°' 0 N45°12.W 1191.3
• `� g� / /•/f7 AC. , , ', I n'
F FROM RE-ENTRANT ,0 ��, < `�
CORNER OF GEORGE \ ° /` 27 ° ay°`�F�'.J° / pJ yy
4 RICNAROSON D.L.C.38 \ .° ,�/ / g y�i,�'1' Cn //
// g
as/
� 4200 a0 3902 " / ' ° -
46Ac./ so g \/ 26 `„
/ ' o°\0 2.034c. / /
j/ / '0
va / / ao° 3000 0 Aso
/ 90 .584c.
/4201 ° \� o \
/ o/ ti,,
j
•
4e AC. (�'1 1 1\J\ 2
m° / 0 c''• / J° / (1.,._\ , `.J 1- / o ( :1.601
s° °o
/ �a/ a 1,) �1 // 'oo Q° �� f� =� F" 284c.
�/ ,,'` 1 / J ° y °P
so��, 0. a Oh. -4 V`' / 24 4 1,g p�I`'°
i
6` / ''• P'' ', /
a O a yC
0 - 0 �GP 3909 '' o '
'9 s MO a���,°,k / /' 00 \ , / // / 3701
(`\\ �a /4A \ ',ro1� / / .a° 3802 ' . / ss 4c•
\..._. I\ \ 1 0 7onz\ "'h ./8AG e
93043217
„, M TD 51 484 Washington County
lei..
■
DEED OF RECONVEYANCE
e
FIRST AMERICAN TITLE INSURANCE COMPANY OF OREGON, an assumed business ame of Title
Insurance Company of Oregon, hereinafter Trustee, under that certain trust deed dated June 1 i r
19 88,executed and delivered by DENNIS C. WIEDER AND HILDE C. WIEDER
as grantor
and recorded on June 15, , 19 88 ,in the Mortgage Records of Washington
County, Oregon, in book at page , or as file/reel
number 88-25678 ,conveying real property situated in said county described as follows:
S
tf
AS FULLY SET FORTH ON SAID DEED OF TRUST
Recorded By
First American Title Insurance Company ci Oregon
No
having received from the beneficiary under said trust deed a written request to reconvey, reciting that the obligation
secured by said trust deed has been fully paid and performed, hereby does grant, bargain, sell and convey, but
without any covenant or warranty, express or implied, to the person or persons legally entitled thereto, all of the estate
held by the undersigned in and to said described premises by virtue of said trust deed.
DATED: May 28, , 19 93 TITLE INSURANCE COMPANY OF OREGON
By •... `... . I
Multnomah 111 STATE OF OREGON,Count y of )ss.
The foregoing instrument was acknowledged before me this 28th day of May 19 93
by Carolyn Abbott, Assistant Vice President
of Title Insurance Company of Oregon, a corporation, on behalf of the corporation.
Notary blic for Oregon
My commission expires:
STATE OF OREGON '
County of Washington r
SS
����1-`1-��`,,—lll�`- I,Jerry R. ,• �' or of Assessment
/ Ar<•• OFFICIAL SEAL / and Taxation-•_,.... e" order of Con-
)'J c DOUGLAS E.SAGE l) veyances f•• Y.1 c• ,'rag• eby certify
f /' NOTARY PUBLIC-OREGON that the _ instrument 'Of,siting was
COMMISSION NO.004315 f received ".{0..,..11_1001(2,.0!.�cOn13 of
MY COMMISSION EXPIRES JAN.28.1995 i said C 1.': rL '4. C-
�- ����-`�-�! * S R• 'Director of
ssment ,Ex
'C/A Q' r O
COUNT•
After recording return to:
Hilrlp r_ wi(adQr Doc : 93043217
9807 SW Siuslaw Lane
Tualatin, Oregon 97062 Rect: 101111 13.00
Att: 06/02/1993 02:58:53PM
.,z
Reference No.
TI97 2/85
'Pc -• • . il. ,
•
.
r• V -• .
• ‘ ''''s
44 Ilk. or 1 • a. 1ft
•' 'Ur
•4111•• • •NI& ip, !" • s• 400 1
la **• 4-, -gb. 41
....' 'Ir
•
• $.4
)
AAA :111
4 1 A ■ i 4.
II
— .
JO
"14111.01111
%. •41. lb s or., ,
•:.A.
"SW Ilk
Ill _
4' 14 -it
.....
lel.W.IWIIIII.W°r
ool•.."111.11.11V . ....
o•
pia Oh
.4.
. .111110 #- Illip•
., .
. . 0
N'''.........„.......
i .
IVA
• .
* .
. .1• . ,.. .
. 4
f ZZall ' . •
. .
I:
1 .
-..
-;-•-r 44*
•• -- -, -
. _
•
. .
1
. ..
1 ,
.,..
• 41' .% : ''
•
&o,.
, , jo 0,
lii
liptir
.,
,
,
•,. ,•'''' - 1111/40 140, ilik.
,,I:•,.:,
1,1%111411',
I,1
,, .,..40 'IV I. • '(Iii.11',■1
I'IlaRI-i
• . .
. ,
.1 "OA Ilmoi, , ,. „,. .■ .
,,, '' ..,1' •ii.' •
e •'
F-
.' ' ir • ,
. ..
..,,
1• '0',''''
..,
•
,, ',,.■;',1:0I,,,,,,
1 ....'
, 4 ,
1 .,J,1111'.
, .
, , , , _.,
0. - •)1.1.
II
,
• _ •
i .,..
4 %is il
likr. ,
. ,
.,, ....„ „,,, .40„.........
li tr.. ,.
,1,.,;
1:,.:4;
$* - ■ ?ii,1,N;;ip., ..,,,,
i,,..,,,,
* '' ''.•',! ,..,,: ,....,11!:,
. ,.',, ., 11,,,,
. '140. :,".1...,.1,..:.t.,,,,,..i.,
'01, . 1 ,k, W 1"."',„i"-,T,',"'' -, •
4101, ,;;;;,!;4.,;,'..,,• .
,