The URL can be used to link to this page

MMD2006-00010 MMD2006 00010 HUDSON PLAZA MODIFICATION heitto I CITY OF TIGARD OREGON August 17,2006 Marilyn Henderson Marland Henderson 11795 SW Katherine St. Tigard, OR 97223 RE: Hudson Plaza,Modification Request, Case File No.MMD2006-00010 Dear Mr. and Mrs. Henderson: This letter is in response to your request for a Minor Modification (MMD2006-00010) of the approved site development plan (SDR 36-78) located at 12900 SW Pacific Hwy, WCTM 2S102BD, Tax Lot 1900. You have requested to construct a 27'x 41' building. This concrete block building will house motors, blowers and pumps used for cleanup of a gas spill that occurred in the 1970s. The design of the building will abate the sound-of the equipment from the nearby tenants. Proposed along with the equipment mom is a new handicap accessible restroom, which will insure the complex complies with current ADA requirements. On the south side of the building will be a new recycling/solid waste storage area. This area will be enclosed high concrete block walls and a gate, both over the six foot requirement. In addition to the new building,the northeast portion of the parking lot will be redesigned to provide more parking for the commercial buildings on site. A possible coffee cart use is mentioned in the narrative, but no plans or derails are provided with this submittal. Another applicant will be submitting a separate application for the future coffee cart. That proposed use is not part of this application. Analysis of Modification Request: Section 18360.060 of the Tigard Development Code Site Development Review chapter,states;"any modification which is not within the descnption of a major modification as provided in section 18.360.050 shall be considered a minor modification." Section 18.360.050 states that the Director shall determine that a major modification(s) has resulted if one (1) or more of the changes listed below have been proposed: 1. An increase in dwelling unit density or lot coverage for residential development. The proposal does not involve residential property. Therefore,this standard does not apply. 2. A change in the ratio or number of different types of dwelling units. This criterion is not applicable, as this request does not involve a residential development. 3. A change that requires additional on-site parking in accordance with Chapter 18.765. The proposed building will include an ADA restroom, a mechanical equipment room and a recycling/solid waste storage center. None of these uses requires additional parking. Therefore,this criterion is not applicable. 13125 SW Hall Blvd., Tigard, OR 97223 (503)639-4171 TDD (503)684-2772 .•• • 4. A change in the type of commercial or industrial structures as defined by the Uniform Building Code. No change in the structural occupancy type of the buildings is proposed. Therefore, this criterion is not applicable. 5. An increase in the height of the building(s) by more than 20 percent. The applicant has not proposed any changes to the existing buildings. The new building will be one story at street level like the existing buildings. This standard is met. 6. A change in the type and location of accessways and parking areas where off-site traffic would be affected. Changes are proposed to the parking areas, but not to the accessways. Traffic flow on-site will be enhanced,while off-site traffic will not be affected. This standard is satisfied. 7. An increase in vehicular traffic to and from the site and the increase can be expected to exceed 100 vehicles per day. This modification will not generate additional vehicle trips. Therefore, this criterion is satisfied. 8. An increase in the floor areas proposed for a non-residential use by more than ten percent excluding expansions under 5,000 square feet. With the new building floor area will be expanded by 1,107 square feet;therefore this standard is met. 9. A reduction in the area reserved for common open space and/or usable open space that reduces the open space area below the minimum required by the code or reduces the open space areas by more than ten percent. There are no areas reserved for common open space within this development. This standard does not apply. 10. A reduction of project amenities (recreational facilities, screening; and/or, landscaping provisions) below the minimum established by the code or by more than ten percent where specified in the site plan. The proposed change will not reduce landscaping below the minimum required by code. (Plans provided show 20% of the site as landscaped— 5,664 of 21,247 square feet.) However the existing street trees are being removed and must be replaced to comply with current landscaping and screening standards. Trees species must be from the City's Street Tree list and spacing shall meet the requirements of Tigard Development Code 18.745.040. Therefore this criterion can be met conditionally. 11. A modification to the conditions imposed at the time of Site Development Review approval that is not the subject of criteria (B). 1 through 10 above this subsection. The original site plan was approved under SDR 36-78. Staff recommendations from the decision had to do with inadequacy of the proposed landscape/street trees along Walnut Place and parking lot screening. Based on the plans provided and a site visit, the only landscaping being removed are the flowering cherry trees and grass adjacent to Pacific Highway. A condition of approval will insure that street trees are replaced. This request is determined to be a minor modification to an existing site. The Director's designee has determined that the proposed minor modification of this existing site will continue to promote the general welfare of the City and will not be significantly detrimental, nor injurious to surrounding properties, provided that development which occurs after this decision complies with all applicable local, state, and federal laws and the condition below: CONDITION OF APPROVAL PRIOR TO THE ISSUANCE OF SITE AND/OR BUILDING PERMITS, THE FOLLOWING CONDITION SHALL BE SATISFIED: (The staff contact shall be Cheryl Caines in the Planning Division(503) 639-4171) Page 2 of 3 1. Submit a revised site plan showing the size, species and location of street trees to replace those removed for this project. The plan must be reviewed and approved by the City Forester prior to issuance of site and/or building permits. This request for Minor Modification approval is hereby granted. If you need additional information or have any questions, please feel free to call me at (503)39-4171 ext.2437. Sincerely, NIA+, Co....&n. ) Cheryl Caines Assistant Planner is\curpin\cheryl\mind\mmd2006-00010 (Hudson Plaza).doc Page 3 of 3 ♦ C� "+ • ` CITY of TIGARD <AW tff Nv4444.4r GEOGRAPHIC INFORMATION SYSTEM t4 4# 4g 1.4. • ? TT TY MAP ' P•i- W 4 41 /r Ar 4% MIVID2006-00010 HUDSON PLAZA 01 ##>J, • 4 I sp � , ,Jrigi'' . 0- immel i Vt.,-%-1(4,c,fr _ 4.eli :leo r FA, \ - a L% • Y , =•NRA�' s, "447 , t �l / � /y Tigard Area Mep�I♦ s , _ . , 2 N 4Virlir. ♦ 41., 0 100 200 306 406 Feet/ 0A ■ . -7,., ST • . . •■ *• * * • TIGARI IA 1 Information on this map Is for general location only and ♦ should be verified with the Develo ment Services Division. p FA, Q 325 SW all Blvd . 40,4 �\r. . . TI 713 V 01VA UttASIA �-�� / htlp:l/www.ci.tlgaM.or.Us Community Development Plot date:Aug 18,2006;C:\magic\MAGIC03.APR 71 2S102BD-01900 u'v ` /C 4 v '/ '' rs HENDERSON MARILYN D HUDSON TR as 6t p v 1 ii0 11795 SW KATHERINE ST TIGARD,OR 97224 . 4 -- .'i Wr ; MINOR MODIFICATION n,,�ECEI TYPE I APPLICATION VFp . City gcTigand Phor Center 13125 171 SW Hall Fax SOB159,T i U OR 97223A G 1 5 ?006 CITY GENERAL INFORMATION P�NNINWO NG NERD P ( ) 12�C�O >l� ��cC / &Y WEE Property Address/Locations (ii n, Pc, FOR STAFF USE ONLY Tax Map&Tax Lot#(s): X15/o l aD OjW p4,l, 2 0i4 6 (t(g3 g140 -croa0 Site Size: A ti, • S 6 Case No.(s): Other Case No.(s): Applicant*: y � j-Li `Zl�(Q� Receipt No.: 9-0-0 b If0 9 tL Address: k ��9 -- �Lt3 `c-\--if-ck(1._*._. ..(- T City/State: -TA CI}\pD Zip: L 2 3 Application Acce ted By _ Tee* Primary Contact: iV ' `O ■ - . t� � 1Li Date: ��I‘.57��O Phone: .- --63`7_ R5'_. Fax: _ - C-4,3 Property Owner/Deed Holder( (Attach list if more than one) Date Determined Complete: (Y\A"2 t L ( k Ot ► L i l-- Rev.7/5/06 �� i\cwpin\masters\land use applications\minor modification app.doc Address: S St (c'�-1 c4tAl[`c `---e,--T" Phone: -�j7-2� City/State: C) 0 Lee, Zip: ci YL7' * When the owner and the applicant are different people, the applicant must be the REQUIRED SUBMITTAL ELEMENTS purchaser of record or a lessee in possession with written authorization from the owner (Note: applications will not be accepted or an agent of the owner. The owner(s)must sign this application in the space provided without the required submittal elements) on the back of this form or submit a written authorization with this application. PROPOSAL SUMMARY Application Form The owners of record of the subject property request permission for a Minor Owner's Signature/Written Authorization Modification. To review a modification as a Minor Modification,the Director must first find that the expansion does not invoke one or more of the 11 criteria discussed 7( Title Transfer Instrument or Deed within Section 18.360.050(B) of the Tigard Development Code. If the modification exceeds the maximum allowed under any one or more of the following criteria,a E/ Site Development Plan(3 copies) Major Modification review is required. Major Modifications are processed in the same manner as a new Site Development Review. In a separate letter, please ❑ Site/Plot Plan(reduced 81/2"x 11") address the criteria below contained in Section 18.360.050(B) including a detailed n/ Applicant's Statement(3 copies) response to each criteria. `;" (Addressing Criteria Under Section 18.360.050(B) 1. An Increase in dwelling unit density or lot coverage for residential development. 42 Filing Fee $562.00 2. A change in the ratio or number of different types of dwelling units. 3. A change that requires additional on-site parking in accordance with Chapter 18.765. 4. A change in the type of commercial or industrial structures as defined by the In addition,the Director must find that the proposed Uniform Building Code. change complies with the underlying standards of the 5. An increase in the height of the building(s)by more than 20%. applicable zoning district. To complete this review, 6. A change in the type and location of accessways and parking areas where off-site the Applicant's proposal must include a discussion traffic would be affected. indicating how the site expansion will continue to 7. An increase in vehicular traffic to and from the site and increase can be expected comply with the minimum setback, building height, to exceed 100 vehicles per day. parking land landscaping standards. Other 8. An increase in the floor area proposed for a non-residential use by more than applicable requirements such as minimum Clear 10%excluding expansions under 5,000 square feet. Vision areas near driveways and street intersections 9. A reduction in the area reserved for common open space and/or usable open may also be applicable depending on where the space that reduces the open space area below the minimum required by this building expansion is proposed to be constructed on code or reduces the open space area by more than ten percent. the site. 10. A reduction of project amenities (recreational facilities, screening, and/or, landscaping provisions)below the minimum established by this code or by more than 10%where specified in the site plan. 11. A modification to the conditions imposed at the time of Site Development Review approval that are not the subject of Criteria 1 through 10 above. APPLICANTS: To consider an application complete,you will need to submit ALL of the REQUIRED SUBMITTAL ELEMENTS as described on the front of this application in the"Required Submittal Elements"box. (Detailed Submittal Requirement Information sheets can be obtained,upon request,for all types of Land Use Applications.) THE APPLICANT(S)SHALL CERTIFY THAT: ♦ The above request does not violate any deed restrictions that may be attached to or imposed upon the subject property. ♦ If the application is granted,the applicant will exercise the rights granted in accordance with the terms and subject to all the conditions and limitations of the approval. ♦ All of the above statements and the statements in the plot plan,attachments,and exhibits transmitted herewith,are tare;and the applicants so acknowledge that any permit issued,based on this application,and may be revoked if it is found that any such statements are false. ♦ The applicant has read the entire contents of the application, including the policies and criteria, and understands the requirements for approving or denying the application. SIGNATURES of each owner of the subject property. cith DATED this day of r l 5 ,20 Z6A,(41 )Si • e s Si gna Owner's Signature Owner's Signature CITY OF TIGARD 8/15/2006 • 13125 SW Hall Blvd. 10:38:39AM s Tigard,Oregon 97223 TIGARD (503)639-4171 • Receipt #: 27200600000000004094 Date: 08/15/2006 Line Items: Case No Tran Code Description Revenue Account No Amount Paid MMD2006-00010 [LANDUS] Minor Modification 100-0000-438000 490.00 MMD2006-00010 [LRPF] LR Planning Surcharge 100-0000-438050 72.00 Line Item Total: $562.00 Payments: Method Payer User ID Acct./Check No. Approval No. How Received Amount Paid Check MARILYN D. HENDERSON ST 1074 In Person 562.00 Payment Total: $562.00 cReceipt.rpt Page 1 of 1 MINOR MODIFICATION 12900 SW PACIFIC HIGHWAY, TIGARD, OREGON EVALUATION CRITERIA APPLICANT'S STATEMENT 1. No increase in density or lot coverage for residential development will be made. 2. No change in ratio or numbers of different types of dwellings units will be made. 3. No changes of required on-site parking will be made. 4. No changes in the type of commercial or industrial structures will be made. 5. No increase in heights will be made. 6. No change in the type and location of access ways and parking areas where off-site traffic would be affected will be made. 7. No increase in vehicular traffic to and from the site and the increase can be expected to exceed 100 vehicles per day will be made. 8. No increase in the floor areas proposed for a residential use by more than 10% excluding expansions under 5,000 square feet will be made. 9. No reduction in the area reserved for common space and/or usable open space which reduces the open space area below the minimum required by this code or reduces the open space area by more than 10%will be made. 10. No reduction of project amenities below the minimum established by this code or by more than 10%where specified in the site plan will be made. 11. No modification to the conditions imposed at this time of Site Development Review approval that are not the subject of Criteria 1 thru 10 above will be made. Owners Date Marland and Marilyn He derson , 08-07-06 I LinCc.t101� nc tfT1 Hsi e e.. -- a c1 d _ 4c4 cl c4-oprd ba��•-u��'t - Con45,1, ac 00 flew, eA.ziAr 1•4- STATE OF OREGON } SS WHEN RECORDED MAIL TO: County of Washington MARILYN D. HUDSON Jer ��; 11795 SW KATHERINE ST I, ry,R ,` _LAt or of Assess- ment and Taxation acid x Officio County T I GARD, OR 97223 Clerk for/said county, do hereby certify that (/n the withi ,4§trurnent of wilting was received and in book of records of said county.retitled 1/4 ,ter � �`L ferry R- ,Hanson;pf3'rector of eS,S t and.Taxation, Ex- tct& Clerk Doc : 2000017392. 1 Rect: 250053 27. 00 03/03/2000 04: 19:47pm SUBSTITUTION OF TRUSTEE AND DEED OF FULL RECONVEYANCE The undersigned U.S. BANK NATIONAL ASSOCIATION, f/k/a [ WASHINGTON FEDERAL SAVINGS BANK ] in and under the provisions of that certain Deed of Trust executed by ROBERT E. HUDSON Trustors, to TICOR TITLE INSURANCE COMPANY OF CALIFORNIA as Trustee for WASHINGTON FEDERAL SAVINGS BANK, a corporation dated DECEMBER 27, 1984 and recorded DECEMBER 28, 1984 in the office of the Recorder of WASHINGTON County, State of OREGON Instrument 84049953, of Official Records, do (es) in accordance with the provisions of said Deed of Trust, hereby give notice of the Substitution and Appointment of U.S. BANK TRUST COMPANY, N.A. in place and instead of the trustee above named, and do (es)hereby vest in said substituted Trustee, all the rights, title, estate, power, duty and trusts conferred by said Deed of Trust upon the Trustee therein named. And whereas the indebtedness secured, to be paid by the Deed of Trust above mentioned has been fully paid and/or satisfied. NOW THEREFORE, U.S. BANK TRUST COMPANY, N.A. as substituted Trustee, does hereby GRANT AND RECONVEY unto the parties entitled thereto without warranty, all the estate and interest derived to the said Trustee under said Deed of Trust in the lands therein described, situated in the County and State above mentioned. Reference being hereby made specifically to said Deed of Trust and the record thereof for a particular description of said lands. Dated: February 7, 2000 .— —.-. ��..rv� vv.�.r•�, ar. - . v.0 J-WW 1. 1rAl1VLVl114 t1��JVl.1Ml 1VLI Substituted Trustee f/k/a [ WASHINGTON FEDERAL SAVINGS BANK 3 Beneficiary TERRY TZ, VICE P SI T _ :TERRY IIT , V E-PRESIDENT STATE OF OREGON ) (` COUNTY OF MULTNOMAH On February 7, 2000 before me, the undersigned, a Notary Public in and for the said County and State, personally appeared TERRY METZ personally known to me to be the VICE-PRESIDENT of the Banking Association/Corporation that executed the within instrument, therein named, and acknowledged to me that such Banking Association/Corporation executed the within instrument pursuant to its by-laws or a resolution of its Board of Directors. ..�, OFFICIAL SEAL WITNESS my hand and official seal. CHRISHATCH /� _/� --s c.c..a, •eZ r,4' NOTARY PUBLIC-OREGON `: HUDSON PLAZA 11795 S.W. KATHERINE ST. TIGARD, OR 97223 To Whom It May Concern: As owners of Hudson Plaza we are requesting a minor modification of our property located at 12900 SW Pacific Hwy., Tigard, Or. Please note this property is free from any encumbrances, mortgages, or liens. The property is currently held in the Marilyn Jensen Hudson Henderson Trust. If you have any questions regarding this application, please contact Marilyn Henderson at 503-590-2399 or Marland Henderson at his work number at 503-639-5537. Thank you for you po.t . • Man . d 'Of First American 13/7IZOOb 9:54 PAUL 1/b Hightrax • ,mob' ""s'rc.� First American Title Insurance Company of Oregon An assumed business mns ofTITIE INSURANCE COMPANY OF OREGON 222 SW Columbia St., Suite 400 *Portland,OR 97201 Phone: (503)219-8746 *Fax: (503)790-7872 MARLAND HENDERSON Order No: 335565 Date: 2006-08-07 Delivery Type: Fax Standard Orders Total: 2 Phone No: (503)244-8323 Email: We appreciate this opportunity to be of service to ymu. If j vu have any questions regarding this report,please call: Robert Lynn Phone No: (503)219-8746 Fax No: (503) 790-7872 This bile inbrnation has been famished,without charge,in conbrnance with the guidelines approved by the State of Oregon Insurance Commissioner. The Insurance Division cautions inlernadiaries that this service is designed to beret the ultimate insureds, indiscriminate use only benefiting intermediaries will not be permitted. Said services may be discontinued. No liability is assumed fir any errors in this report Fax:639-3663 First American 8/7/2006 9:54 PAGE 2/6 RightFax • 4$.S AMER,c i ''F First American Title Insurance Company of Oregon Washington(OR) Prepared For: Prepared By. Customer Service Department 1700 SW Fourth Avenue - Portland,Oregon 97201-5512 Phone:(503)222-3651 Fax:(503) 790-7872 OWNERSHIP INFORMATION Owner :Henderson Marilyn D Hudson Tr Ref Parcel Number :2S 102BD 01900 CoOwner T:02S R:01W S:02 Q:250 Site Address : 12900 SW Pacific Hwy Tigard 97223 Parcel Number :R0464483 Mail Address : 11795 SW Katherine St Tigard Or 97223 Map Number . Telephone :Owner: Tenant: County :Washington(OR) SALES AND LOAN INFORMATION Transferred :04/17/1998 Loan Amount . Document# :39285 Lender . Sale Price Loan Type . Deed Type Interest Rate . %Owned Vesting Type . PROPERTY DESCRIPTION ASSESSMENT AND TAX INFORMATION Map Page&Grid :655 E4 Midland :$347,290 Census : Tract:308.01 Block 4 M*lStructure :$293,730 Subdivision/Plat :Frewing Orchards MktOther . Neighborhood Cd :7PHY MldTotal :$641,020 Land Use :2012 Coin,Improved M50 Assd Total :$440,480 Legal :FREWING ORCHARD TRACTS,LOT C&PT %Improved :46 :B,ACRES.56,PORTION OF ACCOUNT 05-06 Taxes :$7,199.57 :NON-ASSESSABLE Exempt Amount : Exempt Type . Levy Code :02374 Millage Rate : 16.3448 PROPERTY CHARACTERISTICS Bedrooms Lot Acres :.56 Year Built . Bathrooms Lot SqFt :24,393 EffYearBlt . Heat Method Bsm Fin SqFt Floor Cover . Pool Bsm Unfin SqFt : Foundation . Appliances Bsm Low SqFt Roof Shape . Dishwasher Bldg SqFt :6,656 Roof Mall . Hood Fan 1st Fb SqFt :3,200 hnteriorMat . Deck Upper Fir SqFt Paving Mall Garage Type Porch SqFt Const Type . Garage SF Attic SqFt Ext Finish . Deck SqFt . This title information has been furnished,without charge,in conformance with the guidelines approved by the State of Oregon Insurance Commissioner. The Insurance Division cautions intermediaries that this service is designed to benefit the ultimate insureds. Indiscriminate use only benefiting intermediaries will not be permitted. Said services may be discontinued. No liability is assumed for any errors in this report. First American 8/7/2006-9:54 -PAGE - 376 HightFax ST Amax/e. 44. First American Tide Insurance Company of Oregon An assumed business name of TITLE INSURANCE COMPANY OF OREGON 40 771 is map is provided as a convenience in locating property First American Title insimnce Company assumes no liability Pr any variations as may be disclosed by an actual survey Reference Parcel Number 2S 102BD 01900 / BOAC . ... . . ...., , / II,,/,( I ... 8 N ) c)\ ,I11�I �� 'b�' aO' 1300 ' 111 11,41 • /& , 011 .20 AC 00 / I��II I 38AGo d1' 2, 11I ,�' •�1 1400 � 1 �III1 I1IIIII 64. k 30 AC �� !r / i I i I 12000 rrr! / Jo AC ,�e IIIII1 IIII� �i,� � �° 1 �lrlrl. 1503 .34� �'}' �I �I 4' 1.47 AC 2100 / 111111 // \ \ 38 "i /4- ,t 111TH s., / .4 I�Illl \ <\cJ �, \ 2000 = A ' �� S 1701 /.23 4 \ 43A AC p .b, \ 2101 \ � 43 2800 \ 0_= \\ .) \ �� 37 /— \ 6AC ,. , < 8d Ac rr , cb\\ A., ,,,,,,,,,,,. . '% '0 ,,,,e,„, c_,.._ rr \ \ l� 1601 ■J m Si, , . cl \s'�° F r'...4.----:— / s,\--'-/ ;: ',< ','`11.' /-/, \‘.\\$) ..../'sys' 'sx'Aiispet''',/ '):' : , \\, -:!,\ \ xvzit. \/' \,. \/< �\ / \^, \-, /`/ \''/'/ ,. C\ D \ \\'/ _d�!o / \/ 1600 ABAG� < >/\ ti' >)1,, < \ 3.71 AC '' ' % , < ,K >: ;</ %< \s '>/� \\Y /943 \ First American 8/7/2006 9:54 PAGE 4/6 RightFax sT AMsa, , ;' i+ First American Title Insurance Company of Oregon An assumed business name of TITLE INSURANCE COMPANY OF OREGON This map is provided as a convenience in locating property That American Title Insurance Company assumes no liability for any variations as maybe dix'losed by an actual survey Reference Parcel Number 2S 102BD 01900 Ab 1 V1tiU - - ;4''•':'��r(' 'r,': �'r,�• � � 0". •` •,k'`:.'Y r,,jVAl:,y :i^}�.`: .�r: C s 01(59-'K , it '1tt r - �•� ,x <i , � / • ...:‘,/..,. v i. .<. 48 • -.„...\k=\'‘.1...''''7'7*'-:'' ' ' 41?114r...y. .-PP •>�`' \r Y "' -`� � Y ,i /, . >`, -x: ,: x ,4tee"^ LA. �\ ' "• rmJaNr a ' / .�� ' �a . ,Ito 4•4f,e; e/1\1 ✓ /- Ifl up /. ♦ NMI ),-\ .:Xv'tx\17,':;,tT��::TTrs lr:�Y,AI IC :g:',:-:,'X'' `r ' A �n 4�1 Iq ri 4\ VI\C/ 1�4"..�. ,K•-). t l:-•,,A ,'•/•;,K x %T\%'` .a lx' •••`• .' • 8 01-1 11 % \ 4.C.:),;,>,;;:,:>;:.::>::;:,:"..;.Y':r 1011AOI Oil 420- •-• „..„.... • ,.„ ,4••••••40,..... III '.(14.4t.:,.. • "AY,:::‘,/;:e....X.g:.?::.•<,.'A..:::',.;:;,,,Ar.., ..<;,..4,i iiiht, 41"......4100, ... - -4. y l�h .sT r M ^y �SL. r:'��, .x,\. ,r,T c a xi\�;r1 r X: ,-....:-;;<>?::.c......, • 7 , , ... _ ,,,,,,,,,,..,,,,,,,,,t,c..:,:. ,3, : :<.......:„:,...„„,..::::::.:... ./, \\ ,... , . {' `--/.i K•. .�:' \ :',..S, d�.1. �r'/.Sk�ix •`:A Tr.:r, ammo ..'...X....,” Y+r ) �� art �'.•. ' IA r..:::%:•x' :,..,..,•::,,,,,......,.,,x . i / -..;‹,,,:...,.......),......,.(,../x., t.) . \„:„,\,..„ „....,,, \ '<'%•.`_ X ';.'_ FFnn ;\/ F,'. '. •.• /`7 •' ■e / \ UM a" i' r iv:fif} \ H , .• 'NY }•;y:•�:e .` . , r ppq•K,. x jV \::'i',: \ - 'r .,max,.-:. ....,...:x..... xl(l�l:,:; x :i�.r.<,.r• � ,:'x C �,,,, ..x X"•Y,f,:\ :: k\' ` '_x._ " r.x', \,\ x.xr:j` r, .,x ..,�, .-�i,:•: ' Zi,!�\'rz,.a..:•frix• 1. �: ,:.\,Y:\ ..•x..r.. a^..., ,.\: • 2S 1 02BD First American 8/'//2OOb U: 54 PAGt 575 ttightrax START OR OIlftON Cosner of Waddagionn } LJelry44., af AS• W. Uwe Rnta..w. +L _mix -+ Iml,ALTl1t1AM 11u uT{ZIt1 UP eeq cosi wean he.ea.1 SW neend.Oa 171104 4r A'4' • • ` „ • ra Doc t 98039285 Recta 207049 38,00 04/17/1998 02:31r14pa WamxMy Dead-Statutory Form tndrtdtr Oman MARILYN D.HENDERSON,f3raner,coneys and warrants to MARILYN DORO HEA JENSEN HUDSON HENDERSON,Trustee.or her.ui orTrustes*s).In the MARILYN HENDERSONTrust UIDIT I Match 12,1908,Gurnee,the toloalng described real property tree of encumbrances=apt as medic* I sat forth twain alluded In Washington Gouty,Oregon,to nit LLot�lsron Heights,Plat No,3,In the County d WaMnknpbn.8hnts of Oregon. Lot C.8ubdelelon d Lot 2,end Pert d Lot 1,FreWmg Orchards Tracts,Yerrhkglon Coup, Oregon. PAMELA Porten Lot 21.hewing Ordrrd,Traub.Washington County,City of Tlgrd.Oregon. see Exhibit A attached hereto and by this reference cede a part hereof. True and areal oor iIdii tto•Is Other promises made and ghren iris Tffeimailiaffervau.nOTALLOWum OPTHEPnOPERTTos9CaITHenlaiR n.lii . flC OFAPiN'�� Ih$O tN!woe MO1NsJLAT101m. BEFORE NORSIO OR ADC�rlNO t.MT9 ON IJIWB Jf5 WONT S4161110 OR FOREST wanton AE C 'INFO 4 MIR PEOPIEITT MOULD CHECK WM THE APPROPRIATE CRY OF COUNTY MINNS CEPARTMENT TO VIVAPY APPROVED Una PAIO TO DIMMIse ANY N Online= Dated this 12th day at March,1998. 140111 .HENDERSON - STATE OF OREGON.County d Mrkro nah )as. The Mnlrtansnt nna s renhowtadged betore me March 12,1 MAB1LYN D.NENDI . `fir IOISt91l 91M € inn Public for Oregon ' 1 w�,c' ' My ,t 2/7/he"j tw ooaaarMOM B8t181's al.WA Until a th a is requested.it tax d.temsnb stmt be sere to the taloei g address: NO CHANGE • dust American 8/1/Z006 6:54 PAUL 6/6 Kightrax • 4 ...a.. • • SXS1622 •R• • A portion of Lot 2I, 221+5ISO O*C1t3a0 sflct*, Ls the CLty Of Tigard, Coosty of sashia*tes tad Slat* of Stenos, dseeribed as follows* %syisaios atria volt! as the Southeastarly Liss of the Oast Sid* PRaitis Iiyhvay whose it Latlrssats the titorthsasteriy lies of said let 111* theses South 63447, Lass along the said Northeasterly line 200 feet to a psiatr thease Southwesterly parallel with the Southeasterly Ilse of the said Vast site Paeitio fithvay 163 fasa, nose or less, to a point as the northeasterly Liss of that treat of las4 e*aveyoi to Ladvif ande;soe on null Li, ifid is took 127, page 222, sasblastos yeasty o..4 toaorda, said paint being 200 feet from the paint of isterssatios of the northeasterly its* of the said aadersoa butt with the Southeasterly lies et the said Vest Side pacific fighvayr thsaos Northwesterly ales, the fertbaiaterly line of the said Anderson Treat 200 foot to the losthaastarly line of the said nest Side Pacifii fighways these* Northeasterly aloay• the Sosthsastarly its. of salt fiyhway 163 feat, sere or kegs to the point et hegiasisy, • . . {- , . 4 • i A • • • • • • 1.11111111111.111111111111111111111111111 A 11111111"1./ 0 50 100 SCALE: 1"=50' - - - - SW PACIFIC HIGHWAY MATCH EXIST. MATCH EXIST. GRADE GRADE EXTRUDED CURB LATCH EXIST. GRADE QjJJ. \,...,.,;:%.0, MED 1 liii.**11i"U O LATCH IX6f.� O PEKING STRIPE GRADE PNW MIN STRIPES NEW EXTRUDED CURB L91.—.- BA'1.--AIIP TAD PROPOSED clii C C fC C r 2_4•PK o E. WI DB10 _ PUNTER DRAMS THR� ,�`r �RADE EXIST. 1 • • © (', (�, (, C NEW SEE NOTE LBvT—Lf- --1 BA'L - .• T/L 1909 T/L 3000 7 GARBAGE t RECYCLE AREA NEW �� D ` EXTRUDED CURB r o Z o C I- I- 3> Ci so M In J 0 CD (V 4 C▪5 Q J W 1- (7 EL _S Q J 1- HUDSON PLAZA z 0 IV 1 2900 SW PACIFIC HIGHWAY Q J EL 0 SITE PLAN a NARITIVE FOR MINOR MODIFICATION APPLICAy�N FOR 12900 SW PACIFIC HIGHWAY CE/Vg-r1 TIGARD, OREGON AUG 1 4 2006 Thursday, August 10, 2006 p�ANN NGOF TIGARD ENGINEERING Item 1, Existing plot plan: Identified in red ink are the existing buildings. Near Highway 99W is 12900 SW Pacific Highway with suites 110, 210, 220 and 310. This building of approximately 48' x 36' has a sunken first floor and two stories above it and has been torn down with a demolition permit. Historically it was a parsonage house for the United Methodist Church but since 1974 it has been an office building and remodeled into four separate offices one of which was a State Farm Insurance Agency. Upon completion of demolation the building and after removing the basement materials from the dig out, it will then be excavated either to within 5' of the known high water table or no more than a total of 6' below top of grade. The bottom and sides of the cut will be lined with geo-fabric and then filled in with 3' of drain. Continuing to an asphalt sub-grade level a layer of 1 1/2"minus compacted fill will be placed, following it will be compacted and capped off with asphalt concrete to create future parking spaces. Item 2, DEQ and a new equip. compound bldg.: Attached please find communications with the DEQ for completion of a gasoline remediation system that was given to us by DEQ to finish. In short it identifies the problem and our request for finishing the cleanup of some 16,000 gallons of gas that was spilled back in the 1970's. We are proposing as active and passive system that will require pumps and motors that are driven by 3-phase electrical power motors and blowers that create excessive noise that needs to be muffled. In our proposal (to you) we have indicated an eight inch concrete block building to abate the sound from our tenants. Included in this compound will be interments and gauges to monitor the work being done. No one knows how long the process will take but 5 years of remediation is thought to be the normal time to indicate how long that it may be. Item 3, Pride Disposal Company: Attached please find documentation from Pride Disposal Company that indicates they have seen our plans to relocate our garbage and recycling center. Earlier the center was attached to the existing building as well as the remediation compound. Our proposal connects to the aforementioned environmental compound a 20' wide area that encloses the uses of the existing garbage/recycling services. Item 4, Clean Water Services: Attached please find documentation from Clean Water Services indicating that 12900 SW Pacific Highway is not affected by any sensitive areas within 200' of its site. 1 Item 5, Landscape: Attached please find documentation from our engineer that indicates the percentage of landscape for the tax lot of 1900 is more than 20%. Also, 5 trees will replace the 4 that are needed to be removed in the proposed parking lot. Several new islands are proposed to offset the loss of mowed lawn. All of which will be irrigated from existing sprinkler systems that is now located in the new equipment compound building. Item 6, Asbestos, Bldg. Demo and Plbg. Fixtures: when the existing building was demolished a thorough inventory was conducted for environmental sensitive materials and over$6,000.00 of remediation was conducted in removing asbestos related materials which included the paper work necessary for the DEQ approval. Please find attached documentation. Also when the demolition permit was requested an account of existing fixtures were attached; 5 sinks, 4 toilets, 4 floor drains and 3 hose bibs with an existing water meter. The sewer was capped off and inspected on final inspection of demolition. Please find attached to Demo. Permit#BUP200600269. Item 7, Handicap Bathroom and Coffee Cart: Adjoining the new equipment compound building a new bathroom is proposed. This bathroom is multi-purpose. Created out of the need to conform to ADA requirements for the complex this bathroom is proposed to service all tenants with their ADA requirements for our center. This facility will meet and exceed the ADA compliance necessary including parking lot requirements and accessibility. This bathroom will also be available for the convenience of patrons and operators of a proposed coffee concession cart. Presently this is a proposed 18' x 18' concrete pad that has adequate connections to power, water and drainage that will be utilized from the old fixture count and utilities from the demolished 3,000 office building. Please see attached shop drawings. Addressing for this building would assume the same"12900 SW Pacific Highway"as did the older building. Item 8, Neighborhood Meeting: On March 27, 2006 a neighborhood meeting was conducted after paying for its process and due diligence with the City of Tigard. The meeting was not well attended. Only one couple who owned Wendy's restaurant showed up and they had no objections. Please find attached documentation. Item 9, Parking Lot: As expected the parking area for the center will be increased by some 8 to 10 spaces depending upon cities approval. Compact spaces will be utilized as much as possible. Angled parking is being designed to create better traffic flow and easier parking movement. A minimum of 1 new handicap space will be available for access to the new accessible bathroom. The total parking lot will receive a new 2"overlay with new curbs and bumpers for the new parking areas. Re-striping will follow as weather permits. At least one new post light will be installed in the new center planter/divider. The new garbage/recycle/bathroom/compound will be adequately lit at the exterior to provide extra parking area lighting for safety and visibility at night. 2 Item 10, Flag Pole: A new flag pole is proposed as having a dual purpose. In order to discharge affluent gases of any quantity the regulation requires the discharge to be of a significant height. Our proposal is to use a 35' flagpole as that vent. From the compound the affluent are piped underground to the base of the flagpole and then allowed to be discharged into the atmosphere where air currents are normally moving right along as is the traffic on Highway 99. This flagpole idea is much more pleasing to the eye then any other alternatives. If there are any further needs or comments please feel free to contact me at 503-639-5537 or 329-0159. Marland 3 ! AUG EN1 It:4 IN ...._ - 2 Ev 0 EE 06 D sW PACIFIC HIGHWAY CITY ,.,..:. .,\,..:: 1.z.. .P:A NN1NG "L' RD MATCH EXIST. / ............._.• . RiNG ..1' . •••?.:.;.-..:1: 0 . . ':s. •.;5%-$••*, ".."---,. i . . 13.•• E•,/(:: . . ........ 7•••• -'''‘=.:-,..4::' / . . .• , ,.:•:':‘i- - 1 NeVVF-' /. •-• . \\\ EW '•RKINt. STAL S • • " '"••-• . ',.... ., .• / ffc ..........,---NEW PAINTED ..... .1aki•----.' ... / PARKING STRIPES 2-4" PVC .'" = 0 ,:1•': ,'...,\:':':::0 ..'.. IN--DRAINS %.. '.....I •E--- —, . THRU URI3 ,,,,,,..-•,' --,•-•. i.......,- MATCH EXIST. . ..,. riq L RECYCLE AREA T/L 1900 GARBAGE & NEW LIGHT 4- —cA.:::. ...i SEE NOTE V) NEW 3> EXTRUDED CURB r— z z oc) •:,,, o_ —0 ..o F- ro c■i 2> 0 ,o m c) CV ■ co L.5 a < ._1 EL. --- -------------------. Lu Z?) 0_ LAN DTSLCA19P0E0AR= 21 ,245766s2. sfqt.. ft. A 7 , -±- < 2 TL 1900 = 21 ,247 x 20% = 4,249 sq. ft. --1 J /V Z HUDSON PLAZA 7 :-.--, 12900 SW PACIFIC [HIGHWAY mummunnimmummimmi z LANDSCAPE AREA 0 .30 60 0 u) a SCALE: 1"=30' = on_ I11111111111 1111111111111111111111111111 A .././ 0 50 100 SCALE: 1"=50' E/QED AUG142006 CITY OF PLANNING iEN�lNE�RlN G SW PACIFIC HIGHWAY MATCH EXIST. Ir MATCH EXIST. GRADE GRADE 0 MATCH EXIST.1� /) GRADE , \ \ r..' f`.3 . may ts.A., / /o- NEW PAINTED � _d q�_L,_ ` ./--NEW STRIPES NEW L81 tr_ �—I",I ,- J S , 1 7Yxa,e PAD W, I I I r c 1 PCB c ._c. , ...__ Z-4"PVC I S ' j6 (ilk O.'"' $3 THRU DRAMS URC i J MATCH EXIST. ..-.� GRADE I ■ ❑I© b _,p-�■ NEW LIGHT�"-°-.�..pi • C c c fc' SEE NOTE yai 1-..— / —....-1 ao,L.— ....-19-40,4/4, 4111.■ ( L T/L 3000 T/L 190 p GARBAGE&RECYCLE AREA NEW D J UJ EXTRUDED CURB z 1 C f - 1 -♦ ri -ii II rn '.0 {k{1 O I O ! i \l `1 1 i co 11 Li (21 1 ,,,:,_ Z CL w co TL 1900 and 3000 = 53,441 sq. ft. CL TOTAL LANDSCAPE AREA = 11 ,384 sq. ft. 'z LANDSCAPE AREA = 21% a J CL Z HUDSON PLAZA 0 V r N a 1 2900 SW PAC F C HIGHWAY 0_ CL co SITE PLAN a_ 8 F _ .. mt GI t) 1:-_- til : 0 ..•• 1,1 Cfr. "TO ■,1.• 'Illr iiiir •r, 411P/ 1111Sls a ' 4 . .. — ,..., Nwilit, ,, . ,,,, ' ./1/. N, .- i - \•■■ .. , • ' \ / 1 7,.• .,, '1, /../ • / / • . 01/' • ''‘ . //> / / iby / •> .• 1 •■■••.\/ , Y2 1 .‘s 4111 '4 to N .•-• , / \ • ' ' i:1410‘' • . / /''' ........ • . . . 11 1-- /x .• , • ....\ \qt. . s..' i . 4146... • v.., .. —, ...... i7is Gs Ju.I UU UU UL . L'L'r ate 1'10 Ile;Wel euji Ut.me L. :BUJ t UUUL' r+. I 06/30/06 FRI_ 13:28 FAX DEQ AIR QUALITY . b`', 6' -'�- bd - ` �y o • Departinient of Environmental Quality /11‘ ?.2.- '-.":...64 "zt `4 �l_J 1 Northwest Region Portland Office k 2020 SW 4''AvIttie,Suite 400 � + ' Theodore R.Kulon,oki,Guw`cnot Portland,OR 97201A987 • - (503)229-5263 February 24,2003 FAX(503)229-69-15 "TTY(503)229-5477 MARLA1N1D a MARILYN flE2sTDER.SON RECEIVED 12950 SW PACIFIC HIGHWAY, SUITE ITE 225 TIGp. D, OREGON 97223 MAR 2 0 2003 RE: Hudson!'leas ATER WYNNE up DEQ File No. 34-93-0155 Dear:vlr. ez Mrs_ Henderson: • Recently,Henning Larsen,Andree Pollock.and I have discussed the Hudson Plaza cleanup project Our records indicate that you are the owners of the Hudson Plaza property located at 12950 SW Pacific Highway in Tigard,Oregon. Since 1995,Peavey Oil,the owner and operator of a se vice station previously located on the property,has been conducting a cleanup of petroleum contamination leaked from The station's underground storage tank system. Recently, Peavey Oil indicted they had insufficient resources to continue with the cleanup work and requested that the Department ofEmi*ontncntal Quality(Depart:neat)perform an"Ability-to- , Pay"evaluation to confirm this. The results of the determination indicate Peavey Oil does not have the resources to continue the cleanup work. In circumstances such as t ese,the Department looks to other`responsible parties"as defined in Oregon revised statute 465255 to complete the work. Based on your owccrship of the property,the Department has identified you as responsible parties for the Hudson Plaza cleanup project. The irmiediate effect of the Del,a.aucnt's d t rmin. on is to suspend aaxfarcement of the cleanup requirements on Peavey Oil and to shift these responsibilities to you.. These . responsibilities include compliance wifi the investigation and cleanup requirements described in Oregon adraitiistrative rules 340-122-205 through 260,and reimbursing the Department for • oversight costs. Currently,there is an of staaading balance for oversight charges on fie Hudson Plaza cleanup project totaling approximately S32,000. • . The Hudson Plaza project is in an advanced stage of the cleanup process. Considerable work has been performed to develop a corrective action plan(CAP)for the site,perform cleanup of the affected properties,and monitor trends in groundwater eontamimant levels. At this time,the Dense-anent Suggests that you work toward finalizing a CAP to clearly establish the cleanup - objectives for the project and to describe how they will be achicVed. In finalizing a CAP,plea be aware that you have considerable flexibility in bow compliance with the cleanup regulations can be demonstrated. Choosing to reduce human hmith risks through active rentediation or - rnznrving those risks thorough engineering and institurionel controls are both viable options. • --m - 4-. 3 1p Jo& 7 'MC /. . . .. . , . ..-- - 111111 Hr . . 7.. ..1. . L .Eli. .. " .,....L....,.. ' . ,'":".:,' .. .----"i "*" T-' "1. • 1---7- r 7 .T_L i T..-1...1" ...... tt1.00 CINEWCP I- .4-7 :: 1,:' ..‘ . 1. '1" y-1-1--.1) i 1, $ 12°N• 1 -3— --- T • 1 7-r -- .• • • - ' L • I -r • 7--..................-7t---..T.----r.-.- , ..- —1-1"---17 ,---,,---:., tr---t---rr-"÷""- I • . Fri. ek3;1•01 111111.1111111 ' 1. 1 11111.1111 tri\%WA.: 11•11111111111111111111 ‘1.1111=1/1 = ill1 ., 1.11Mall . --1-11----77-' i ":,;- TO L _i__ELL. boeb -1-___T"..r. _1....r. _1_21 .... 4 \i'x4 I. 1 mwd- /./lo'likko -7 1 I" 1 -1- , i 1_ 111 it 1 , - ! • 1 1 1 1- '--1-11:- . 1 • ••••3- -"--1 t f---r--1, 1-- : 1 L.......E.... 1_.‘ 1.. ! r _,____ ___ - II I l'' ... . ... '•.. . .. 1 3 to oz)-t, it -rCtcgd- • -iroO it 1 i:k•4 cr,j4 ...u.3:,Otis: — - ---:: (vagoirezo • - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - It % I I , • , . , Madand Henderson Construct, ,.....,1 :,,, , : : . 12950 SW Pacific Hwy.# I ''.K :t :-.- „ A•I ..6, Tigard,OR 97223 . . •il coda afr i A I" '1/4■AVk- W r d.OvIc.-LAU - - - ,.. _ - ,-- . - — - .- 1 _ _ ,_ , _ _ 0.0t.kweis.. fkti?6tJe‘ 11 .. , - ,)... . x 41' 40A-mk cogc.e.,A-t_ ier,of..... i , III. 18< 17 II 1 _I 1 r to . — . - --- j i 'I. , . .1.____::,____• , 1 . ; 0.4.1-ko ' ' '''' 1 I f . i f \ it . I _ lc sa, 1 I ... 1 I \ / 1 I c I ... I /SOK; 91 I • I I - I t 4' : 1 PNA k kni.li it _ . .. ! i r Lti tA.c...,r.,xre / .; i ., . .,4 t... r • 4 L'._ _ _ s '' V ir . ..-,. I • . i 4 1 - — .4\04 6 • , , , 1 f ..c./ ut_p I .... • I. ' , . I lb r aso 1 SIN ,, ..... .. , II . . . 4 : ...„..;L,...L...L.li 2.444' 1.1•44 ___;_,__.. ___ti__._L-.-_4__._L__..L. .. . " . li I , . ILJI - . , 1 . 1 1,_ _ _ _ .._ ,_ tuel kiee.ect..trou _. ,_ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ -, i..A4 i) Go Nteetio; , , . cogterkeit. il itenkv-rkr . 11 I WfkLY.- , 101.61.1c—, 1 . . 1 ; . . i ' . , . Von ?tf4v . . 1. I . _ I , . It Cor" , _-_,........—,,, Y6. i i ri ,....„..• _ _.... ,, • , • (O.. . heJ. \MC-kS • Madand Henderson Construction 129508W Pacific Hwy.#5 Tigard,OR 97223 . • 1 . • --..."..---4111P-..".--- . ..a' . 1 , .' (I . tunt t-(. 44--1 X12 P�I A 101 yl(1.17Ct.A-710 rotti )igquJM1 I� 1. I S ;'.so(T �► l �� --' ClRkn+a H -- •(1 iZ0S5 G 't►0r-t h 'i•Y. - 11 0 N 1J r r �11�� Ij�1Q�OfN` i— €(6t1 II I 5 Tfr5 II [ .. ._ I. . ... ........... czi,‘, V 'i * . 1 Con\v:se .o "(\ H�- rl. _. I r 2/ - - - - -- - - - - - - - - '- - - r - -- 1 1 �' ` 1 e l,__1-0 -.. _._F. ..._1.e F. .� ;-.._��_.... ;_ I • _.L o._- ?....-E ` I � 7 1 1 ' i - - ' _ _ . - - - - - - ~° I- - - - — — -, , I I I I I f- �w{ 1s' '1 �� 1 , I . t h_ *4 1+a/♦G. I b'I o.G I 1 ° 1 I 1 i-1 I 1 C.V.) I e r I t ° I I l I I I . ?\M..t .. ( I 1 I �0 'r n�L� I I 1 — C,r11��/,a� _ I ( • I I H I 1/4 ....U 1 fl I a. '? I 1 I 1 I ° 1 i I -- r I 1 11 I f y I I I e I ( I I _ � I 9! I rf 1 .I I I Martand Henderson Construe* 12950 SW Pacific Hwy.#5 Tigard,OR 97223 • / 0 1 I I� f f g,c<-10ataM.P'h + 1.u.cs Ri&v.e 2,. AzciA., c.„10. . •\,..Inte...$ 77' _._,..._..r. . T__...._�� 1 L «T .... .�..._. . 40(24-L. ((• . .r..__. .� {. }... . . I �. . ._. `..-.1. .. 1- J._ 1 T---_.g... .....,�. ... _, t. +_. .. !. ...... 1--_._.t.. Mariand Henderson Constructs 12950 SW Pacific Hwy.#5 Tigard,OR 97223 atar :JET uu cj ttr rle O.IaJ IIrt iU i •u1i Cain ua l-. Cjuj M- 06/30/06 HRI 13:29 FAX DEQ-AIR QUALITY Ij 002 • Mr.and Mrs.Henderson February 24, 2003 Paget Please submit to the Department a schedule for completing the CAP by Marelln 31,2003. 13 sed on the proposals described ki the CAP a scope of work and schedule for completing other required activities can than be established. The Department recognizes that the financial troubles of Peavey Oil have resulted in a subsrzntiai burden being placed on you to bring this project to closure. The Depart tint.will tly to accommodate and assist you in any way it can to accomplish this goal. if this letter requires clarification,or you have questions regarding the cleanup project,you can contact plenning Ler;en at(503) 229-5527. Sincerely. ! � 1 Z Neil Mullane Northwest Region Ad inistrator CC: Dan Marnford C aig Ware-- • Bergeson-Boese&Associates - "GeoDesigns,Inc, _ 65 Cent:.nniai Loop 17400 SW tUg r BOOne:s Ferry RD, Suite 230 Eugene, OR 97401 Portland,OR 97224 Max Miller Doug MCCourt _ Tonkin Torp LLP Ater Wynne; LIP 888 SW 5th Avenue 222 SW Columbia,5-cite I SOD Portland, OR 97204 Portland,OR 97201 • Finn tier Our Service Makes The Difference! NSMITTAL Date: June 19, 2006 TO: Mr. Marland Henderson "1L c MH Construction, LLC 12950 SW Pacific Highway,#225 Tigard, OR 97223 Subject: Proposed Design Summary and Work Plan In situ Well Air-Stripping Soil and Groundwater Remediation Hudson Plaza Site Former Peavey Service Station Site 12900 SW Pacific Highway Tigard,OR 97223 DEQ File No. 34-93-155 We are sending the following: One copy of the above-referenced report. Remarks: If you have any questions or comments, please contact meat(503)624-6393. Thank you. 6/(Cf;Z Charles S. Swift Applications Engineering 12950 SW Pacific Highway•Suite 225 •Tigard,OR 97223 503-624-6393 .503-624-6562 Fax•www.frontierenv.com ' FrontierOur Service Makes The Difference! NSMITTAL Date: June 19, 2006 TO: LOP], Ms. Laurey Cook Department of Environmental Quality Northwest Region s 1550 NW Eastman Parkway, Suite 290 Gresham, OR 97030 Subject: Proposed Design Summary and Work Plan In situ Well Air-Stripping Soil and Groundwater Remediation Former Peavey Service Station Site 12900 SW Pacific Highway Tigard,OR 97223 . DEQ File No. 34-93-155 We are sending the following: One copy of the above-referenced report. Remarks: If you have any questions or comments,please contact me at(503)624-6393. Thank you. 2Z7 Charles S. Swift Applications Engineering 12950 SW Pacific Highway •Suite 225 •Tigard,OR 97223 503-624-6393 •503-624-6562 Fax • www.frontierenv.com _ Faun tier Our Service Makes The Difference! June 19, 2006 Ms. Laurey Cook Fjl4,e.O p Department of Environmental Quality Y Northwest Region 1550 NW Eastman Parkway, Suite 290 Gresham, OR 97030 Subject: Proposed Design Summary and Work Plan In situ Well Air-Stripping Soil and Groundwater Remediation Former Peavey Oil Company Service Station Site 12900 SW Pacific Highway Tigard, OR 97223 DEQ File No. 34-93-155 Ms. Cook: MH Construction, LLC (MHC) on behalf of Marland and Marilyn Henderson (Hendersons) is pleased to present this Proposed Design Summary for continued remediation of the Former Peavey Oil Company Site referenced above. The Hendersons are committed to performing the remediation efforts needed to complete the soil and groundwater cleanup at the site. If a portion of this summary does not meet your criteria for the site, or if those criteria have changed, MHC will review comments and consider the appropriate modifications. 1.0 INTRODUCTION The current site owners have expressed concern over the length of time to achieve cleanup. The Hendersons have requested that Frontier review the site and propose additional remedial efforts that will bring the site to closure in a timely manner. Frontier has developed this work plan for this site to be submitted to the Oregon Department of Environmental Quality (DEQ) however, the Hendersons have requested that Frontier commence field studies at this time to determine the feasibility of the most likely candidate for the new remediation system. 12950 SW Pacific Highway •Suite 225 •Tigard,OR 97223 503-624-6393 •503-624-6562 Fax • www.frontierenv.com To that end, Frontier has determined that the site conditions, and levels of contaminants of concern, make enhanced in-situ well air-stripping, as a technically feasible option for this site. Frontier prepared this report to summarize the remedial approach to provide the rationale that was used to assess if remediation is necessary, and what remedial options are applicable to the site. On the basis of previous remediation efforts, current concentrations of residual contamination that remain at the site, and at the request of the DEQ, a more aggressive remediation strategy is proposed to address contaminants both on and off the site. The findings of the previous environmental investigations related to the petroleum hydrocarbon release(s) at the site are incorporated into this report to the extent that they assist in describing the site conditions. The reader is directed to previous reports if a more comprehensive discussion of previous site investigations or more detailed data are desired. A list of reports and documents reviewed are presented as Attachment 1. 2.0 PROJECT DESCRIPTION The site is located at the south corner of the intersection of SW Pacific Highway and SW Walnut Street, tax lot parcels 12900 and 12950 in Tigard, Oregon (Figure 1 - Site Location Map). The site is located in the southeast on-quarter of the northwest on- quarter of Section 2, Township 2 South, Range 1 West of the Willamette Meridian in Washington County, Oregon. The site is currently occupied by a vacant two-story structure (former Parsonage), and has an in-active groundwater remediation system. (Figure 2- Site Plan) 3.0 BACKGROUND INFORMATION In 1993 a soil vapor extraction (SVE) and a groundwater pump and treat (PT) remediation system were installed by RZA-AGRA, Inc. (RZA) under contract with The Hendersons. In 1994 GEM Consulting, Inc. (GEM) was retained to evaluate and operate the existing remediation system. In 1995 Peavey Oil Company (POC) took over the remediation activities and in 1995 David Brown & Associates (DBA) was retained to expand the existing remediation efforts. The system was expanded by installing multiple combined SVE and air sparging (AS) wells, air moving equipment and, conveyance piping throughout the parking lot to the northern portion of the Parsonage. The system was originally designed to remediate groundwater and to minimize off-site migration of petroleum hydrocarbon impacted groundwater. POC hired Bergeson-Boese & Associates (BB&A) to replace DBA in 1997. The SVE/AS and GW PT system was operated intermittently between 1996 through 1998. Due to the presence of gasoline vapors accumulating in the former Parsonage building IN SITU_RCW_WORKPLAN_HUDSON PLAZA_06 1906 PAGE 2 JUNE 19,2006 COPYRIGHT 2006 FRONTIER ENVIRONMENTAL SOLUTIONS.INC. the AS portion of the system was shutdown. In late 1999 The Hendersons retained Kleinfelder, Inc. (Kleinfelder) to improve the effectiveness of the remediation system. In 2000 the system remediation system was expanded to continue to use the PT and SVE systems and incorporate a dual-phase extraction (DPE) system to concentrate the soil and groundwater remediation directly under the former Parsonage building. The system was operated until June 2002 when the DPE system failed due to lack of maintenance. At the time of failure POC refused to repair the equipment or continue the remediation efforts. At that point POC contacted the DEQ and claimed financial hardship in October 2002 and were released from completing the remedial action. The remediation system has not operated since 2002 and from groundwater sampling performed at the site it appears to have reached a steady state where the contaminant concentrations do not appear to be decreasing. This most likely is caused by residual levels of petroleum hydrocarbons adhering to and adsorbed on to the soil and limited influence of the remediation activities performed to date. 4.0 PURPOSE OF ASSESSMENT Frontier has completed a review of alternative methods for the remediation of the petroleum hydrocarbon impacted soils and groundwater at the subject property. This review is based on our knowledge of site conditions, and our experience with similar projects. The purpose of this feasibility review was to identify viable cleanup action alternatives for the identified contamination (petroleum hydrocarbons), based on a number of factors including: • technological requirements • limitations or restrictions • anticipated cost • possible risks • permits required • cleanup effectiveness • cleanup certainty • regulatory acceptance Frontier has reviewed several groundwater cleanup action alternatives for the subject property. During this review,the following information was considered: o geographic location and surrounding land use of the property o contaminants identified o contaminant and extent of contamination o subsurface geology, lithology, and subsurface hydrogeology IN SITU_RCW_WORKPLANHUDSON PLAZA 061906 PAGE 3 JUNE 19,2006 COPYRIGHT 2006 FRONTIER ENVIRONMENTAL SOLUTIONS.INC. o contaminant migration pathways(as identified in previous studies) o effectiveness and reliability of cleanup action alternatives o current federal, state,and local cleanup levels o site constraints The following cleanup action alternative selection factors were evaluated in this feasibility review: • Efficiency of a cleanup technology in reducing or eliminating contamination (e.g., removal of contamination sources will remove pathways of human or environmental exposures and thereby provide a higher certainty of human health and environmental protection.) • Certainty in achieving cleanup levels and predictability in schedule to arrive at the cleanup levels. This includes the restoration time frame. • Relative costs of the reviewed cleanup action alternative. • Compliance with criteria for independent cleanup actions (the primary contaminants are petroleum hydrocarbons), including reliability. • Cleanup permanence and the absence of the need for institutional controls. Alternatives that result in no need for long term monitoring or institutional controls were reviewed. 5.0 SCREENED GROUNDWATER CLEANUP ACTION ALTERNATIVES Several cleanup action alternatives were identified as potentially applicable for this site. The initial process involved a review of available literature. This resulted in elimination of many cleanup alternatives. This study has focused on the three considered to be most viable for the site. These include: • Continue groundwater extraction with DPE technologies with treatment prior to discharge to the local sanitary sewer system. • In situ air sparging technologies with specially constructed remediation wells and equipment. • In-well air stripping (groundwater recirculating wells) with specially constructed remediation wells and equipment. 5.1 REVIEWED CLEANUP ACTION ALTERNATIVES In review of the groundwater cleanup action alternatives, slow, uncertain, or costly alternatives were less favored to reflect the desire of the Hendersons to expedite the cleanup and reduce future liability. Other important considerations included neighborhood impacts (noise, aesthetics) and degree of certainty in meeting DEQ Groundwater Cleanup Levels within a relatively predictable schedule. Of the cleanup IN SnU_RCW_WORKPLAN_HUDSON PL.zA_061906 PAGE 4 JUNE 19,2006 COPYRIGHT 2006 FRONTIER ENVIRONMENTAL SOLUTIONS,INC. action alternatives screened, in-well air stripping appears to be the more feasible alternative for the site, given the identified factors listed below: 1. The source of the original release has been removed,and it is assumed that there will be no new releases over the life of the cleanup. 2. Free phase product is no longer observed in any of the wells on site. 3. The majority of contaminated soils (secondary source of contamination) are finer-grained, isotropic and heterogeneous. This type of lithology is conducive to the technology proposed. 4. The existing dual-phase and groundwater extraction and treatment systems appear to have reached "steady state" with no apparent change in the size or relative position of the dissolved phase plume. 5.2 DISCUSSION OF CLEANUP ACTION ALTERNATIVES The screening evaluation(as described above)identified four groundwater cleanup action alternatives that appear to be more feasible for this site than others. A discussion of these four alternatives is presented below and the reader is directed to review figures previously used and completed by others as presented in Attachment 2. 5.2.1 CONTINUE DUAL-PHASE GROUNDWATER EXTRACTION WITH TREATMENT OF PRIOR TO DISCHARGE TO THE STORM SEWER SYSTEM. General Description: The existing groundwater pump and treat system (MW-2 located in the upper parking lot) was combined with dual-phase groundwater/soil vapor extraction (wells located beneath and east of the Parsonage building) with above ground treatment. The above ground treatment utilized air stripping in batch process method to separate petroleum hydrocarbons from the groundwater. The combination of groundwater extraction and above ground treatment is generally considered an effective method for controlling and treating petroleum hydrocarbons in groundwater. This method of treatment requires permitting of treated discharge water from local/state agencies. Proper engineering is critical because problems can occur due to iron and biological fouling of the pumps and treatment equipment,which may result in the need for additional system maintenance. Dual-phase extraction (DPE), also known as multi-phase extraction, vacuum-enhanced extraction, fluid/vapor extraction, and sometimes bioslurping is a technology that uses a high vacuum system to remove various combinations of contaminated ground water, separate-phase petroleum product, and hydrocarbon vapor from the subsurface. Extracted liquids and vapor are treated and collected for disposal, or re-injected to the subsurface. In DPE systems for liquid/vapor treatment, a high vacuum system is utilized to remove liquid and gas from relatively low permeability or heterogeneous formations. The IN SITU_RCW_WORKMAN_HUDSON PLAZA 061906 PACE 5 JUNE 19,2006 COPYRIGHT 2006 FRONTIER ENVIRONMENTAL SOLUTIONS,INC. vacuum extraction well includes a screened section in the zone of contaminated soils and ground water. It removes contaminants from above and below the water table. The system lowers the water table around the well, exposing more of the formation. Contaminants in the newly exposed vadose zone are then accessible to vapor extraction. Once above ground, the extracted vapors, liquid-phase organics, and ground water are separated and treated. DPE for liquid/vapor treatment is generally combined with hioremediation, air sparging, or bioventing when the target contaminants include long- chained hydrocarbons. Use of dual phase extraction with these technologies can shorten the cleanup time at a site. It also can be used with pump-and-treat technologies to recover ground water in higher-yielding aquifers. The continued use of the existing groundwater pump or dual phase extraction system and testing of the subsurface response may be effective in reducing petroleum hydrocarbon levels in the subsurface at the site. The groundwater extraction and treatment system can be utilized to aid in reducing further migration of the impacted groundwater and to aid the recovery of petroleum hydrocarbons from the subsurface. In addition to the dual- phase soil vapor and groundwater extraction system, the groundwater treatment system should be utilized to treat hydrocarbon-contaminated groundwater from the extraction system prior to discharge to the sanitary sewer system at the site. The system should be designed to operate continuously with minimal supervision. General Applicability: The target contaminant groups for dual phase extraction are VOCs and fuels (e.g., LNAPLs). DPE using vacuum is more effective than SVE for heterogeneous clays and fine sands. However, it is not recommended for lower permeability formations due to the potential to leave isolated lenses of undissolved product in the formation. General Limitations: Factors that may limit the applicability and effectiveness of the process include: • Site geology and contaminant characteristics/distribution. • Combination with complementary technologies (e.g., pump-and-treat) may be required to recover ground water from high yielding aquifers. • Dual phase extraction may require both water treatment and vapor treatment. • Site geology and contaminant characteristics/distribution for lateral recovery (drawdown)and inliltration oferroundwater. • Would require a discharge permit for sanitary discharge must be re- acquired for the site. • Capital expenditures for equipment upgrades and installation of additional remediation system components and wells (including trenching, electrical. IN Si l"i RCM: Wt---RiiPi AN }-1"DS('iiv Pi.VA 06I906 PAGF 6 li irvi7 19.7006 COPYRItili!2006 FmoiN iILR ENViRONMLNiALSOWIIONS,INi.. pumps, vacuum extraction equipment, permits, and air stripper replacement). • Monthly operations and maintenance of the system including system performance testing and submittals based on the discharge permit. • Possible noise and disruption to neighbors requiring additional soundproofing and security measures. General Advantages: The advantages to continuing on with the existing system are: • Potentially increased recovery of hydrocarbons through treatment of extracted groundwater. • Decrease the potential for offsite migration (overflowing of pit has historically been noted). 5.2.2 IN SITU AIR SPARGING TECHNOLOGIES WITH SPECIALLY CONSTRUCTED REMEDIATION WELLS AND EQUIPMENT. General Description: Air sparging is an in situ technology in which air is injected through a contaminated aquifer. Injected air traverses horizontally and vertically in channels through the soil column, creating an underground stripper that removes contaminants by volatilization. This injected air helps to flush (bubble) the contaminants up into the unsaturated zone where a vapor extraction system is usually implemented in conjunction with air sparging to remove the generated vapor phase contamination. This technology is designed to operate at high extraction air flow rates to maintain increased contact between groundwater and soil and strip more groundwater by sparging. Oxygen added to contaminated groundwater and vadose zone soils can also enhance biodegradation of contaminants below and above the water table. Air sparging has a medium to long duration, which may last, generally, up to a few years. General Applicability: The target contaminant groups for air sparging are VOCs and fuels. General Advantages: The advantages to this approach are: • This technology does not involve the extraction and treatment of groundwater. Therefore no groundwater treatment system would be required at this site. This would result in lower operation and maintenance IN SITU_RCW_WORKPLAN_HUDSON PLAZA_06 I 906 PAGE 7 JUNE 19,2006 COPYRIGHT 2006 FRONTIER ENVIRONMENTAL SOLUTIONS,INC. costs, and potentially fewer operation problems resulting in more system up time. • Elimination of the water treatment system would remove the need for a water discharge permit and ancillary reporting requirements. General Limitations: Factors that may limit the applicability and effectiveness of the process include: • Would require the installation of specially constructed air injection wells. • Would require site-specific feasibility studies to provide design information(well number, spacing, construction parameters,etc.). • Vapor extraction wells would be required to accommodate the generation of soil vapors that this technology will produce. • The dissolved phase concentrations may be relatively high in some areas of the site (hotspots). This may result in high vapor concentrations and may require air monitoring and possibly treatment of effluent air stream (i.e. catalytic oxidization, granulated activated carbon,etc.). • Soil heterogeneity may cause some zones to be relatively unaffected. • Removal of parsonage building would be required to remove the possibility of exposing the occupants to VOC vapors as recorded in the past when AS was used as one of remediation technologies for groundwater treatment. 5.2.3 IN-WELL AIR STRIPPING(GROUNDWATER RECIRCULATING WELLS WITH SPECIALLY CONSTRUCTED REMEDIATION WELLS AND EQUIPMENT. General Description: This technology is also known as groundwater recirculating wells (GRW) or density driven convection wells (DDC). Air is injected into a double screened well, drawing water into the well through the lower screen and forcing it out the upper screen. Simultaneously, additional impacted water is drawn in the lower screen. Once in the well, a majority of the VOCs in the contaminated groundwater is transferred from the dissolved phase to the vapor phase by partitioning caused by the added energy of the air stream and turbulence. The contaminated air rises in the well to the water surface where vapors are drawn off by a SVE system. This SVE system, in addition to collecting the vapors from within the well, collects vapors from the surrounding vadose zone. The partially treated ground water is never brought to the surface; it is forced into the unsaturated zone, and the process is repeated as water follows a hydraulic circulation pattern, or cell, that allows continuous cycling of ground water. As ground water IN SITU_RCW_WORKPLAN_HUDSON PLAZA_061906 PAGE 8 JUNE 19,2006 COPYRIGHT 2006 FRONTIER ENVIRONMENTAL SOLUTIONS,INC. circulates through the treatment system in situ, contaminant concentrations are gradually reduced. Modifications to the basic in-well stripping process may involve additives injected into the stripping well to enhance biodegradation (e.g., nutrients, electron acceptors, augmented microbes, etc.). In situ well sparging has been demonstrated as an effective tool in the treatment of groundwater impacted with volatile organic hydrocarbons. In this process, air is injected directly into the aquifer using a high-pressure blower. Water within the well becomes turbulent as air is violently diffused through it, resulting in a transfer of VOCs from the liquid phase to the vapor phase. A large concentration gradient is created as compounds are stripped from the groundwater. As the aquifer attempts to regain a state of chemical equilibrium, more impacted water flows into the well and is subsequently stripped as clean water travels outward. The mounding of water within the well induces a second circulation pattern. This mounding is caused by a change in density as the water is aerated. Water is drawn through the bottom of the well as the air/water mixture travels upward and outward from the point of injection through pores in the saturated zone. Air temporarily displaces the water in the pores, causing vaporization of VOCs in the water or saturated soil. In addition, the area around the well affected by the circulation cell (radius of influence) can be modified through the addition of certain chemicals to allow in situ stabilization of metals originally dissolved in ground water. The duration of in-well air stripping is short- to mid-term, depending contaminant concentrations, Henry's law constants of the contaminants, the radius of influence, and site hydrogeology. Because ground water is not pumped above ground, pumping costs and permitting issues are reduced and eliminated, respectively. Also, the problems associated with storage and discharges are removed. In addition to ground water treatment, GRW systems can provide simultaneous vadose zone treatment in the form of bioventing or soil vapor extraction. GRW systems provide treatment inside the well, and in the aquifer. For effective in-well treatment, the contaminants must be adequately soluble and mobile so they can be transported by the circulating ground water. Because GRW systems provide a wide range of treatment options, they provide a relatively great degree of flexibility to a remediation effort. IN SITU_RCW_WORKPLAN_HUDSON PLAZA_061906 PAGE 9 JUNE 19,2006 COPYRIGHT 2006 FRONTIER ENVIRONMENTAL SOLUTIONS,INC. General Applicability: The target contaminant groups for vacuum vapor extraction are halogenated VOCs, SVOCs, and fuels. Variations of the technology may allow for its effectiveness against some non-halogenated VOCs, SVOCs, pesticides, and inorganics. Typically, in-well air stripping systems are a cost-effective approach for remediation of VOC-contaminated ground water at sites with deep water tables because the water does not need to be brought to the surface. GRW systems are most effective at treating sites with volatile contaminants with relatively high aqueous solubility and strong biodegradation potential, e.g., halogenated and non-halogenated VOCs. GRWs operate more efficiently with horizontal conductivities greater that 10-3 cm/sec and a ratio of horizontal to vertical conductivities between 3 and 10. A ratio of less than 3 indicates short circulation times and a small radius of influence. If the ratio is greater that 10, the circulation time may be unacceptably long. Site Specific Advantages: The advantages to this approach are: • In general, in-well air strippers are more effective at sites containing high concentrations of dissolved contaminants with high Henry's law constants. • This technology does not involve the extraction and treatment of groundwater. Therefore the entire groundwater treatment train could be eliminated at this site. This would result in lower operation and maintenance costs, and potentially fewer operation problems resulting in more system up time. • Elimination of the water treatment system would remove the need for a water discharge permit and ancillary reporting requirements. • The existing recovery well(s) may be amenable to retrofitting to this technology. • The site geology is conducive to this type or technology. • The circulation cells have a higher probability of positively affecting all of the subsurface impacted by petroleum hydrocarbons. • The technology is able to remediate any "pockets" of free product, if any that may remain at the site. General Limitations: The following factors may limit the applicability and effectiveness of the process: • Fouling of the system may occur by infiltrating precipitation containing oxidized constituents. • Shallow aquifers may limit process effectiveness. • In well air stripping may not be efficient in sites with strong natural flow patterns. IN SITU_RCW_WORKPLAN_HUDSON PLAZA_061906 PAGE 10 JUNE I 9,2006 COPYRIGHT 2006 FRONTIER ENVIRONMENTAL SOLUTIONS,INC. 6.0 RECOMMENDED TREATMENT TECHNOLOGY Based on our current knowledge of site conditions, Frontier assumes a permanent remediation system will be required. This system may consist of two to three vacuum- enhanced groundwater recirculation wells (GRW), SVE/AS equipment and a sound enclosure in a remediation compound area. The compound area could he disguised or camouflaged using shrubs, flag poles, separate building, hedges or completely buried out of site with underground concrete vaults. Below is a graphic illustration of the construction and operation of a GRW. VACUUM A INJECTION EXTRACTION TO VOC VAPOR BLOWER BLOWER TREATMENT j GROUND SURFACE ' .,,,,,..t I 1 -r r >r AIR INJECTION LINE I I !� I DIAGRAM HEv -VOC CONTAMINATED AR vOC-CON AMNATED - i (t TRANSI1 ON .0 t.` it PACKER OR DIVIDER �I 'iiNCONTAMINATED �`�- ! �s; UPPER RECHARGE SCREEN .1 AIR STRIPPED WATER ..it4/1 WATER WATER • TABLE - v TABLE 1 - 1• (4' 1 41. A , 1 GROUND-WATER I " 1 CIRCULATION ZONE \\. _ A t VOC CONTAMINATED - GROUND-WATER IYFLUEN1 SCREEN - __ FIGURE 1:GROUNDWATER RECIRCULATING WELL (Drawing from EPA 542-R-98-009—October 1998) The wells can be primarily designed for groundwater recirculation, but will also be designed with soil vapor extraction capabilities to provide greater flexibility. A modified SVE and an AS pilot test will need to be performed on the site. IN SITU_RCW_WORKPLAN HUDSON PLAZA 061906 PAGE 1 1 JUNE 19,2006 COPYRIGHT 2006 FRONTIER ENVIRONMENTAL SOLUTIONS,INC. 7.0 REMEDIATION STRATEGIES The strategies for implementation of the GRW remediation strategy include the following: PHASE 1: Pilot study prior to final design of a remediation system that will provide information on the groundwater plume and local hydrology response to using GRW technologies. The testing will provide data needed to calculate the radius of influence (ROI) or site response to the energy added. Based on the theoretical ROI the number of GRWs and spacing can be determined. Based on the number of GRWs the airflow rates (injection/extraction) will be calculated and the equipment will be sized to meet the energy needs. PHASE 2: Installation of GRWs, conveyance piping installation and equipment for source area and offsite remediation. Following installation the system will be started, calibrated and the effluent air stream will be sampled for the potential to emit VOCs calculations. The AS/SVE equipment will be automated with alarms and monitoring sensors integrated to a central controller system. As part of Phase 2 installation system specifications, methods for normal system operation, and monitoring protocol with an objective goal of applicable RBCs will be prepared. A Sampling and Analysis Plan(SAP) and an Operation and Maintenance Manual (O&M) will be presented in subsequent submittals. For the current proposed remediation system configuration, the air discharge will be monitored following startup and will be treated until the vapor concentrations are below the DEQ emission standards for remediation systems. The extracted soil vapors will be treated using vapor-phase GAC, if applicable, and the soil vapor condensate will be treated and permitted for discharge to the local storm sewer under the appropriate discharge permit or offsite disposal. The remediation system performance monitoring, with respect to the observed effectiveness, along with the air discharge quality data, will be presented in future groundwater monitoring and remediation system performance monitoring reports. 7.1 IN SITU WELL AIR-STRIPPING/VAPOR EXTRACTION PILOT STUDY To better ensure the success of using GRW technologies as an option, an in situ well air- stripping/vapor extraction pilot test will be conducted in the near future to evaluate its viability as a remedial option. The pilot study would be conducted to collect site-specific parameters including: Well ID, Date, Water Level, Well Head Vacuum, Air Flow Velocity, Dissolved Oxygen, Conductivity, pH and, HPC (see Attachment 3). IN SITU RCW WORKPLAN HUDSON PLAZA_061906 PAGE 12 JUNE 19,2006 COPYRIGHT 2006 FRONTIER ENVIRONMENTAL SOLUTIONS,INC. 7.1.1 SCOPE OF WORK Our scope of work would include the following: • Examine the condition of the existing monitoring and extraction wells (visually and review of construction documentation)for reuse as GRWs. • Measure depth to groundwater in all wells. If the any of the wells have sufficient open screened interval (1 to 3 feet) above the saturated zone, those wells will be evaluated for use as a groundwater recirculating well (GRW). • Retrofit one well with an insert to allow for groundwater aeration. The sparge line would be placed at approximately 12 to 15 feet below surface grade(bsg)and provide a 5 foot of screen at the bottom of the well and a minimum of 2 feet of blank casing for air injection. The top of the well casing will be fitted to allow for vapor extraction to be applied to the well. The underground piping for the existing wells has open piping and will allow for this configuration. • IF no wells meet the criteria of sufficient open screened interval new wells could be drilled in the place of selected wells. • Remove either of the existing groundwater monitoring/pumping wells. Replace this large diameter well with a six-inch diameter GRW. A cable tool drill rig, using a 12- inch diameter casing, minimum would drill this replacement well. The well would be approximately 21 to 25 feet deep, with the following construction parameters: 5 feet of screen at the bottom of the well beneath 3 feet of blank casing beneath 10 feet of screened interval. • IF necessary, install a four-inch diameter groundwater monitoring well down-gradient of the GRW well. This well would be screened in the upper aquifer. The top three feet would consist of blank casing. Screen slot sizing would be 0.010"; sand (Colorado silica 10/20) would be placed from the bottom of the well to a point approximately one foot above the top of the upper screened interval. A bentonite/cement mix would be placed above the sand pack. Develop the new groundwater well. Survey top of casing elevations the each well. • Measure groundwater elevations in all site monitoring wells. Collect groundwater samples from surrounding monitoring wells adjacent to GRW. Each sample would be analyzed for purgeable hydrocarbons (gasoline) with benzene, toluene, ethylbenzene, and xylene distinction by Northwest testing method NWWTPH-G/BTEX. Measure dissolved oxygen levels in these wells. • Install an in situ sparging system into the selected well. Existing subsurface conduits from the treatment compound would be utilized to place hoses or used if the integrity of the piping is good. An airline would be placed, with centralizers, into the sparge well and attached to an air compressor/blower unit to be located in the compound. A vacuum line would be connected to the well head and connected a vacuum pump. • Start the vapor extraction system (small scale for testing). Monitor the vapor emissions at the exhaust with an organic vapor meter(OVM),and the dissolved oxygen content in IN SITU_RCW_WORKPLAN_HUDSON PLAZA_061906 PAGE 13 JUNE 19,2006 COPYRIGHT 2006 FRONTIER ENVIRONMENTAL SOLUTIONS,INC. each well continuously for eight hours. Place magnahelic gauges on adjacent wells to evaluate the area of influence. Continue to operate the vapor extraction system for five days, monitoring the emissions twice within that period. • Start the air injection system (small scale for testing). Monitor the vapor emissions (using the OVM) at the exhaust and the dissolved oxygen content in adjacent wells continuously for eight hours. • Operate the sparger and the vapor extraction system for ten days, monitoring the emissions and dissolved oxygen levels every other day. • Turn the sparge and vapor extraction system off. Monitor dissolved oxygen readings for four hours. Measure groundwater levels in all site monitoring wells. Collect groundwater samples from selected monitoring wells and testing wells. Each sample would be analyzed by NWWTPH-G/BTEX. • Monitor water level elevations for a 24-hour period with measurements collected every six hours. This activity would be performed during these tests. • Prepare a report with our findings and recommendations. Our report would include vapor extraction system baseline results and results with use of sparging for comparative purposes. In addition, measured water elevation changes, dissolved oxygen levels, VOC vapor readings, air flow rates and pressure/vacuum readings would be evaluated to provide a radius of influence of the GRW system. • Prepare cost estimate based on site specific data and with coordination any proposed site developments from The Hendersons to install a full-scale remediation system. The pilot-scale GRW system will be monitored to comply with the requirements of the reference emission levels from DEQ Northwest Region Guidance for Managing Hazardous Air Pollutant Discharges from Remedial Systems (October 2004). The GRW system effluent samples will be collected in Tedlar bags for laboratory analysis of benzene, toluene, ethylbenzene and total xylenes (BTEX by EPA Method 8020M) and total petroleum hydrocarbons as gasoline (NWTPH-Gx by EPA Method 8015M). The pilot testing events will be summarized in a report, including the system information, identification and interpretation of any observed trends in the data. monitoring activities, emission rate calculations and results, conclusions and recommendations, will be generated for Hudson Plaza and submitted to the DEQ. IN SITU_RCW_WORKPLANHUDSON PLAZA 061906 PAGE 14 JUNE 19,2006 COPYRIGHT 2006 FRONTIER ENVIRONMENTAL SOLUTIONS,INC. 8.0 CLOSING It is the opinion of Frontier that the information presented and implementation of the recommended remediation technology the levels of impacted soil and groundwater can be reduced to meet the requirements for site closure based on the DEQ's Risk-Based Decision Making (RBDM) guidelines (DEQ, 2003). Frontier is prepared to begin the field activities in August 2006. Our written report will be available approximately 21 calendar days after the fieldwork is completed. We appreciate the opportunity to present this confirming proposal and look forward to providing services on the Hudson Plaza Project. If you have any questions regarding the contents of this document or require additional information, please call us at (503) 624- 6393. Sincerely, Frontier Environmental Services,Incs Charles S. Swift Applications Engineering Senior Project Manager Attachments: Figure 1 —Site Vicinity Map Figure 2—Site Plan Attachment 1 —List of Selected References Attachment 2—Tables and Figures from past reports Attachment 3 —In-Situ Well Air-Stripping Pilot Monitoring Data Sheet IN SITU_RCW_WORKPLAN_HUDSON PLA7.A_06I906 PAGE 15 JUNE,19,2006 COPYRIGHT 2006 FRONTIER ENVIRONMENTAL SOLUTIONS,INC. Attachment 1 List of Selected References IN SITU_RCW_WORKPLAN_HUDSON PLAZA_06I906 PAGE 1 JUNE 19,2006 COPYRIGHT 2006 FRONTIER ENVIRONMENTAL SOLUTIONS,INC. American Petroleum Institute, 1989. A Guide to the Assessment and Remediation of Underground Petroleum Releases, Publication 1628, API, Washington, DC, 81. American Petroleum Institute (API), 1996. In-Situ Air Sparging, First Edition. Publ 1628D.. Bergenson-Boese & Associates, Inc., 1998 Evaluation and Selection or Remediation Program Options, Former Texaco Station, 12950 SW Pacific Highway, Tigard, Oregon, LUST #34-93- 0155,November 25, 1998. Bergenson-Boese & Associates, Inc., 1999 Corrective Action Plan Addendum No. 2, Conceptual Site Model and Work Plan for Additional Site Investigation, Former Texaco Station, 12950 SW Pacific Highway, Tigard, Oregon, LUST#34-93-0155, September 21, 1999. Bergenson-Boese & Associates, Inc., 2001 Risk-Based Characterization and Delineation of Petroleum Contaminated Soil, Former Texaco Station, 12950 SW Pacific Highway, Tigard, Oregon,LUST#34-93-0155, February 13, 2001. Bergenson-Boese & Associates, Inc., 2001 Corrective Action Plan Addendum No. 3, Conceptual Site Model and Work Plan for Additional Site Investigation, Former Texaco Station, 12950 SW Pacific Highway, Tigard, Oregon, LUST#34-93-0155, August 13, 2001. Bergenson-Boese & Associates, Inc., 2002 Risk-Based Corrective Action Plan, Former Texaco Station, 12950 SW Pacific Highway,Tigard, Oregon, LUST#34-93-0155, August 8,2002. Johnson, R.L., 1994, Enhancing Biodegradation with In-Situ Air Sparging: A Conceptual Model, in Air Sparging for Site Remediation: Lewis Publishers, Inc.,p. 14-22 Kuiper, J., Andrilenas, J., Miller, S., and Hooten, S., 1993, In-Situ Bio-Sparging in Clayey Silts and Sands as a Method of Removing Volatile Organic Compounds, in proceedings, Seventh National Outdoor Action Conference and Exposition -- Aquifer Restoration, Ground Water Monitoring, and Geophysical methods,National Ground Water Association, p. 97-111 Oregon Department of Environmental Quality Waste Management and Cleanup Division, April 1994, Soil Cleanup Manual (OAR 340-122-045 and 046). Oregon Department of Environmental Quality (ODEQ), June 25, 2002, Response Letter to Document Review, Previously Submitted CAP, Hudson Plaza, DEQ File No. 34-93-0155 Tigard, Oregon, Henning Larson R.G. Oregon Department of Environmental Quality (ODEQ), 2003, Risk-Based Decision Making for the Remediation of Petroleum Contaminated Sites, OAR 340-122-0205 through 0360, Land Quality Division, Portland, dated September 22, 2003. IN SITU_RCW_WORKPLAN HUDSON PLAZA_061906 JUNE 19,2006 COPYRIGHT 2006 FRONTIER ENVIRONMENTAL SOLUTIONS,INC. Recirculating Wells (RWs) at Massachusetts Military Reservation, Spence Smith AFCEE, US EPA Technical Support Project Semiannual Meeting Presentation; 2001, American Petroleum Institute (API), 1996. In-Situ Air Sparging, First Edition. Publ 1628D; Field Applications In Situ Remediation Technologies: Ground-Water Circulation Wells, EPA-542-R-98-009, October 1998; and Site Specific Reports. Swift, C.S., Adams, R.H., Severn, S.R.T., 1993, Results of an In-Situ Recirculation-Soil Vapor Extraction Pilot Study, Proceedings of the 1993 PNWIS/AWMA Annual Conference, Victoria, British Columbia, Canada. U.S. Environmental Protection Agency (EPA), Region 9's Preliminary Remediation Goals (PRG) Table, San Francisco,CA, October 2004. U.S. Environmental Protection Agency (EPA), 2004. Users' Guide and Background Technical Document for USEPA IN SITU_RCW_WORKPLAN HUDSON PLAZA_061906 JUNE 19,2006 COPYRIGHT 2006 FRONTIER ENVIRONMENTAL SOLUTIONS,INC. Attachment 2 Tables and Figures from Past Reports IN SITU_RCW_WORKPLAN_HUDSON PLAZA_061906 JUNE 19,2006 COPYRIGHT 2006 FRONTIER ENVIRONMENTAL SOLUTIONS,INC. Attachment 3 In-Situ Well Air-Stripping Pilot Monitoring Data Sheet IN SITU_RCW_WORKPLAN_HUDSON PLAZA_06 1906 JUNE 19,2006 COPYRIGHT 2086 FRONTIER ENVIRONMENTAL SOLUTIONS,INC. N II _ r ' [ yT.; i3 f S F J I --� vti bR^ , 7" cn..... 4,...,407 ;,_-• - f.I .7 op/ tIJ 4 7 /, 47 3'%111',it wAt_wl Site r.,- Alrikill H ----. ,,.. "„ t. ( s_*, GAARDE /YSW MCDONALD SW ge t,AOUNTAII I.. KRJSE A •r ..n, X T` N r, co 1 5v4 BeeF __ c. SW DURHAM :.7-M. Figure 1 Vicinity Map Hudson Plaza Site Former Peavey Service Station Frrssi titer ,,.v.. " 1 Envfrarsmantal Salutfoars.►„t Figure 1-Vicinity map ..:.. 0 60 t.. Of !: ite>31..f, Mileal 30 F Pabo Service ::: Station 2 5W Y'AC.F IC H Ca-IWAY 5W rm.r.c.,HIGHWAY TAX LOT/11701) ;ere I , 12940 SW PACIFIC HWY. 0111" 0 TAX LOT/3101.1"1-1.. ( k. SALMI:ULU:110 ... e g„r" . .L.T.,....i.R.,,..../;, it 12830 SY/ PACIFIC Wt. FL DIA,Attli CP1'ell 2.. 2 12950 SW PACIFIC WY. / -2. 12900 SW PACIFIC HWY. t 5 ' / /././.77 fa ft Ft. 1 FE r TAX LOT 11#1801 . . iffirAilepor FE. ,...Irr.en / LEGENQ • Paw .. 'n A ://p.:27Offt7 " . EZZI Building -1 --- Properly Uns 41 YT !vl°1rtnitr VELtio, 19.57 1'.N E 0 Mei Ocal mznhoie II TI ./Per Page • Moms Water Catch&obi ......... SHEI7: 10/40, Oroundiatsr Menkaelne Wei Convotiod to F . n : FIGURE 2 0 °roundest*,Rocovaty WM ,"77: • E • ..-.?ni. NOTE.5:ORkwV;WM.:,C44 SIC WP DRAWN 67: REV: PREPARET BY DAVIC,BROWN;NC,ATSATIK,E.r.i..`s: h S . :'..., RAR 714.414.1050 Fas714.014.1049 APPROVED OE: RAR • Attachment 2 Tables and Figures from Past Reports • IN SITU_RCW_WORKPLAN HUDSON PLAZA_061906 JUNE 19.2006 COPYRIGHT 2006 FRONTIER ENVIRONMENTAL SOLUTIONS,INC. itry 311.COMPANY•FORMER TIGARD TEXACO I Sampled t Dectected at of above method reporting limit It Measured t Analyzed ^'.MBTMDD •. - - MCth00 80104020,8240 iPPII 7421 8ree1 Tee31 - - - - - - - - 1.3.5- 1,2.4. • Ieeptopyi. n-Ptopyl Trimsseryt Tr ,sdy$ • Wet Wdheed Depth to Depth to Product Corrected Dete at Benaan• Toluene Ethylbenaeme .Xylem..• 1.,2.OlahktwtLene 1.2.01brameethane Nephthalsne Min benzene benzene benzene betteew. Dissolved DWe/vd. I Number 9evatkn IFLI Weterlft.) Ptedeet(F4.1 Thietnese IFt.OW EL.IFtl Sampling - 1900) 1E081 Vid Own MW 1 188 64 11 03 NM NM 177 61 NS NS N5 NS NS NS NS NS NS NS NS NS NS NS NS , MW.1 188 64 11 19 NM NM 177 45 NS NS NS NS N5 NS NS NS NS NS NS NS NS NS NS 3 MW.) 188 64 10 42 NM NM 178 22 NS NS NS NS NS NS NS NS NS NS NS NS NS NS NS I MW.) 188 64 8.58 NM NM 180 06 NS N9 - NS NS NS NS NS _ NS NS NS NS NS INS NS NS I MW•1 188 64 8 56 NM NM 180 08 NS NS NS _ N5 NS NS NS NS NS NS NS NS NS NS NS I MW-1 188 64 8 75 NM NM 179.89 NS NS NS NS NS NS NS NS NS NS NS NS NS NS I•' 1 MW.1 188 64 6 58 NM NM 182.08 NS' NS NS NS NS NS NS NS NS NS NS NS NS NS 1, 1 MW-1 188 64 7.45 NM NM 181 19 2/11/99 3 a 5.2 56 88 NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA 2 0 B MW.1 188 64 9 32 NM NM 179 32 NO NS NS NS NS NB NS NS NS NS NS INS NS NS NS 1 MW.1 188 64 9 86 NM NM 178.78 8/19498 2.4 4 2 25 26 0 NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA I MW-1 188 64 7.48 NM NM 181.19 5/21.95 2.1 1 8 12 6 4 NO ND NA NA NA NA NA NA NA 4 3 I MW-1 188 64 6 80 NM NM 181 84 2/17,98 3 0 2.1 23 11 _ ND ND NA NA NA NA NA NA ND 29 7 MW-1 188 64 8 44 NM NM 180 20 NS NS NS NS NS NS NS _ NS NS NS NO NS NS NS NS 7 MW 1 188 64 8 45 NM NM 180 19 NS NS INS NS NS NS NS NS NS NS NO NS NS NS NS 7 MW.) 188 64 6 82 NM NM 181 82 5,21.22)97_ 2 9 1 5 25 0 7 7 ND NO NA NA NA NA NA NA NA 4 2 MW-1 188 64 4 83 NO 000 183.81 1/7/97 NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA 0 06 3 MW-1 189 64 9 05 ND 0 00 179 59 10/8/98 NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA _ NA NA NA 0 31 3 MW-1 188 64 6 89 NO _ 0 00 181 75 6/27/98 NA NA NA _ NA NA NA NA NA NA .- NA NA NA NA 1 3 3 MW-1 188 64 4 52 ND 0 00 184.12 3/13!96 2.5 1 5 NO 8 7 NO ND NA NA NA _ NA NA - NA NA NA MW-1 188 64 7 84 NO 0 00 181 00 1/4/98 18 50.0 _ 25.0 176 0 NA NA _ NA _ NA NA NA NA NA NO NA 5 MW-1 188 64 9.72 ND 0 00 178 92 9/20/95 16 7.6 4 4 22.0 NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA 4 3 7 5 MW-1 18864 NM• NO 000 NM• 8/28/95 55 09 ND 12.0 NA NA NA .- NA NA NA NA NA NA NA MW-1 188 64 8 32 ND 0 00 180 32 4/7/95 7 5 I 0 4 9 1 5 NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA t MW-1 188 64 9 46 NO 0 00 179.1 8 NS NS NS NS NS NS NS NS NS NS 1 r.1W-1 188 64 11 75 ND 0 00 178 89 10/8;94 4 1 0 4 9 1 5 NA NA NA NA NA NA NA _ NA NA NA MW-1 188.54 9 78 ND 0 00 178 88 8)8/94 22 9 25.1 160.0 113 2 NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA MW 1 188 64 8 37 ND 0 00 180 27 3/3/94 8 9 20 0 3 3 317.0 NA NA NA _ NA NA NA NA NA NA NA 13 MW.1 188 64 9 61 ND 0 00 179 03 12/31/93 ND 2.6 6.8 16 0 NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA 3 MW-1 188 64 9 65 ND 0 00 178.99 8/28/93 10 23.7 169.0 244.2 NA NA NA NA NA , NA NA NA NA MW-1 1813 64 15.60 ND 0 00 173 04 8/6,92 45.5 7 0 ND 500.0 NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA N PEAVEY OIL COMPANY•FORMER TIGARD TEXACO NS - Not Sampled ND - Not Dectected at or above method reporting limit NM - Not Measured NA -Not Analyzed iii'MS'hNOD',. MRM0080i0'6D2Na2.O(PPM i::i421'/9951 -- . 1,3,5. 1,2.4.',.I Isopropyl n.Propyl TdcootAyl Ttbnedtpl. Dm.of Wolf Weiheed Depth to. Dept to -. Pteduot Connoted Dan et Semen. Toluene Ethybennne Xylem. 1,2•DlcMoreethene 1,2.00remoethene Nphtbeiene MTBE benzene be benzene. - benzene Dissolved 0 NeeWr i Sievaese lFt.). 'Wiest(R.I. Ptedbdt:;1PLIjIOtYdis. Pt]OW EL.IPt] Sampling "' (EOM libel - -. Le.d ( S/2/01 M •2 193 96 13 89 , NM NM 180 07 5/2/01 10 ND 0 1 0 ND(9l 1 0 NO 0 1 C NO @ 1 0 ND Q 1 0 ND 0 5 0_ND Q 1 0 NO @ 10 NO 0 1 0 NO 0 1.0 ND 0 1 0 ND Q 2 1/23/01 MW2 193 96 19.86 , NM NM 174,00 NS NS NS NB NS NS N8 NB NS NB NS NS N8 NS 10/17/00 M •2 193.98 21.10 NM NM 172.06 10/17/00 110 25 17 29 ND 0 1 0 ND 0 I.0 its _ND(Q t.0 1.7 2.5 6 5 9.0 NA -"7/00 MW.2 193.96 20.79 NM NM 173.17 NS NS NS N6 NS NS N9 NS NS NS NS NS NS NS '99 MW2 193.96• 11 22 NM NM 182.74 12/2/99+ 140 19 17 40 NO ND 0.7 ND NA NA NA NA NA •99 MW2 193.96 10.64 NM NM 193.32 9/25/99 350 110 34 85 _ NA NA 38 ND NA NA NA NA NA 5/17/99 MW2 193 96 21 70 NM NM 172.26 5/17/96 110 99 11 140 NO ND NA NA NA NA NA NA 6 2/10/99 MW.2 193 99 6.42 NM _ NM 167.54 2/10/99 230 , 1.9 1.6 16 1.3 NO NA NA NA NA NA NA 20 11/11/99 MW2 193 96 26.75 NM NM 187.21 NS NS N9 N9 N6 N6 NS NS NS N$ NS NS NS NS 8/20/99 MW2 193 98 25 34 NM NM 169.52 9/20/95 10 NO ND ND ND NO NA NA NA NA NA NA 9 8/21/99 MW2 193 95 24.90 NM NM 169.06_ N9 NS NS NS NS NS NB N8 NS N9 NS NB NS NS 2/18/98 MW2 193.96 25.55 , NM NM 160.41 2/15/95 30 2.5 NO 15 NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA 51 11/20/97 MW.2 193.96 25 34 NM NM _ 159.62 • N9 NS NS NS NB NS NS NS NB NS N9 NS NS NS 9/29/97 M •2 193.96 25.20 NM NM 165.75 N8 NS NS NS N$ NS NS NB NS NS NS NS NS NS 5/22/97 MW2 193.96 25.60 NM NM 169.36 NS NS , NB NS NS NS NB NS NS NS NB NS NS NS 1/7/97 M •2 193.96 RW RW RW RW 1/7/97 NS NS NS NS NS NS NS NS NS NS NS NS NS 10/9/98 M •2 193.95 RW RW RW RW 10/8/96 NS NS NS NS NS NS NS NS N0 NS NB NS NB 8/27/99 MW2 193.95 RW RW RW RW 8/27/96 NB NS NS NB NS NS NS NS NS N6 NB NS NS 3/13/98 MW2 193 96 RW RW RW RW 3/13/96 NS NS NS NS _ NS NS NS NS NS NS NS N9 NS 1/3/98 MW2 19398 RW RW RW RW 1/4/98 NS NS NS NS NS NS NS NS N$ NS NS NS NS W 9/20/95 M2, 193.98 RW RW RW RW 9/20/95 NB NS NS NS NS NS NS NS NS NS NS NS NB 7/17/95 MW-2 193.98 RW RW RW RW 6/28/95 NS NS NS N9 NS NS NS NS NS NS NS NS NS 4/7/95 MW.2 193.98 9.57 NO 0.00 184.39 4/7/95 16 9.9 1.2 21 9 NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA 11/3/94 MW2 193.98 13.45 ND 0.00 180,51 10/8/94 M •2 193.98 13.78 NO 0.00 180.18 10/6/94 9100 5100.0 1050 0 7400.0 NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA 6/8/94 M •2 193.96 11 85 NO 0.00 182.31 8/5/94 23.4 _ 24.1 6.1 44.5 NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA 3/3/94 MW2 193.96 12.82 12.54 0.05 181.40 3/3/94 NS NS NS NS NS NS _ NS NS NS NS NS NS NS "'11/93 MW2 193.96 13.89 13.50 0.05 180 35 12/31/93 NS NS NS NS NS NS NS NS NS NS NS NS NS '93 MW2 193 96 13 15 • 12.78 0.37 181 09 8/26/93 NS NS NS NS NS NS N6 NS NS NS NS NS NS l ./92 MW2 _ 193 96 13.76 _ ND _ 0.00 180 20 8/6/92 _ 3520 _ 5810 0 545 0 5870 0_ NA _ NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA • t.. .I ... •...�.r� 1r.r..J _ _- ER TIGARD TEXACO 11.COMPANY-WM I Sampled a method reponing limit Dectected at or 44te l Measured ''INRYHao' • ArulY2ed ---__,_..__._ :::1 f'Ir MnIft00 0010190200760 IPPSt 7421!PPIB IPPI(tli- 1.3.5• . 1,2.4- laoptoptl n•Propyl 1 T(MI thYl Trin•thyl Depth.to Depth to Product Cotteatod pats of Benson. Tolu.e* E1hylienso.a )41.o.. 1,2•Obhforo•thene 1,200ronto.thane Naehtb.l.n. MTBE bonsorto bassos. banes• bonzes* 0600h.d Cfpoloyd W.I1 W.h.d.t.f Wolor WO ProductdP1•3 Thick/um(Ft/OW EL•pk1:1llampihlc (EDC3 IED81 lasd •0 Y9en 'Number Swarm IF1 19 09 NM NM 180.20 NS NS NS NS NO NS NS NS NS NS NS NS NS NS NS M •3 19529 1878 NM NM 180 51 NS NS NS NS NS NS NS NS NS NS NS NS NS NS NS M •3 19/29 17 72 NM NM 181 57 NS NS NS NS NS NS NS NS NS NS NS NS NS NS NS M •3 19129 14 75 NM NM 184 54 NS NS NS NS NS NS NS NS NS NS NS NS NS NS NS MW3 19529• 16 00 NM NM 183 29 NS NS NS NS N6 NS NS NS N9 NS NS NS NS NS NS M •3 19129_ 1520 NM NM 183.99 NS NS NS NS NS NS NS NS NS NS NS NS NS NS NS M •3 19529 13.06 NM NM 186.23 5/17/99 ND NO ND NO NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA MW3 19929_ 10 02 NM NM 189 27 NS NS NS NS NS NS NS NS NS NS NS NS NS NS NS MW3 19929_ 16 52 NM NM 182.77 NS NS NS NS NS NS NS NS NS NS NS NS NS NS NS MW 3 19129_ 15 49 NM NM 183 80 8/19/98 ND ND ND NO NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA MW-3 19129 13 94 NM NM 186 45 5/21/98 ND ND ND ND ND NO NA NA NA NA NA NA ND 3 5 MW3 19129_ 1344 NM NM 185 85 2/17/98 1 4 5 6 1 6 7 9 NO NO NA NA NA NA NA NA ND 3 7 MW•3 1.5129_ 1548 NM NM 18381 11/20/97 1 1 6 1.1 2.6 ND ND NA NA NA NA NA NA NS 2.1 MW-) 19'28- 15.12 NM NM 184.17 9/28/97 ND ND ND NO ND NO NA NA NA NA NA NA NA 1 3.2 MW3 19:29 1315 NM NM 18814 5/21.22/97 ND ND ND NO NO NO NA NA NA NA NA NA 3 2.1 MW3 19129_ 10 61 NC 0 00 188 68 1/7/97 ND ND NO ND ND NO NA NA NA NA NA NA NS 0 23 MW3 19329_ 15 68 NC 0 00 183 61 10/8/98 ND NO ND NO ND NO NA NA NA NA NA NA NA 0.95 MW 3 19129 13 53 NC 0 00 185 78 6/27/96 NO ND ND ND NO NO NA NA NA NA NA NA NA 1 8 M •3 193 29 10 87 ND 0 00 188.42 3/13/96 ND ND ND NO ND ND NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA M101.3 19129 14 51 NC 0 00 184 78 1 M/98 0.79 1 1 0 54 1.7 NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA MW-3 19/29_ 17 09 NC 0 00 182.20 9/20/95 NO 1 0 NO 0.6 NO ND NA NA NA NA NA NA ND 2.2 MW3 19129 15 45 NO 0 00 183.84 8/28/95 65 10.0 44 0 48.0 NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA MIN.) 19/29_ 15 81 NC 0 00 183 48 417/95 ND ND ND ND NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA MW-3 19/29 18 75 NC 0 00 180 54 MW-3 19229 19 50 NC 0 00 179 79 10/6/94 ND ND ND ND NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA MW-3 19:29 - 17 31 NO 0 00 181 99 8/8/94 84 2 6 1 62 9 47 1 NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA MW.) 19329 17 09 NC 0 00 182 20 3/3/94 24 0 7 ND 0 1 NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA MW-3 19329 18 05 NC 0 00 181 24 12/31/93 6 4 2.2 1 7 8.5 NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA I MW-3 19.29- 17 20 ND 0 00 182.09 9/25/93 2 1 ND 0.8 2 1 NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA MW-7 19:29 18 06 ND 0 CO 181 23 86192 0 6 1 0 0 3 ND NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA MW-3 19/29 te---.. EWE _ --- _ _ PEAVEY OIL COMPANY•FORMER TIOARD TEXACO NS - Not Sampled ND - Not Dectected at or above method reporting Ilmb NM -Not Measured NA Not Analysed 10• MITHoo 0010;9020,8260,,P.8) .�++- + Iii' I '1.3.5• li • :r �I. Aeprapyl. rt4bPYl Trllnethyl .•1! 0 ' Deb of• 'I Ws! • W.IMed Dopes tel Depth to Product Com.et.d DN.of Boman. Toluene Ethylbensenet Xylem 1,2.D1o19ossbana 1 2•Dibroe.t on.NaphtlWene MTGE baneee bonze". ' Wow* Ybs Dlsswed C s• (Waging. Wags g. Namber 9aeation IFAL11p1�jllt) Prodret (ELL Thickness IFtIOW EL,IFt.' Sampling.. , . 15001 • FED8) Eesd.' 4/1/02 MW-4 190 70 12.71 NM NM 177 99 4/1,02 41 210 810 3200 l NO Qy 1 0 ND®I 0 210 ND 2 1 0 82 130 _ 260 710 NA 5/2/01 MW-4 190.70 , 15 33 NM NM 175 37 5/2/01 1.2 9 2 130 290 NO 9:0 1.0 ND @ 1.0 39 ND//1 0 12 20 22 150 ND @ 2 1/23/01 M •4 190 70 16.13 NM NM 175 57 NS NS NS N6 NS NS _ NS NS NS NS _ N6 _ NS NS NS -"/17/00 M •4 190.70 14.55 NM r NM 178.14 10/17/00 3 3 39 520 1400 ND @ 1.0 NO @ 1 0 72 NO l0 1 0 44 70 130 430 NA 7/00 M •4 190.70 11.61 NM NM 179.09 NS r. NS NS NS NS NS NS NS NS NS NS NS NS NS ./2/99 M •4 190.70 13 00 NM NM 177.70 12/2/99 41 140 570 2100.00 NO ND 100 ND NA NA NA NA NA 8/25/99 MW.4 190 70 12.51 NM _ NM 178.19 8/25/99 85 290 1000 3900 NA NA 130 ND NA NA NA NA NA 5/17/99 Mw•4 190.70 1000 NM NM 180.70 V 5/17/99 120 490 1300 6000 ND ND NA NA NA NA NA NA NA 2/11/99 M •4 190.70 8.68 NM NM 182.02 2/11199 360 1000 1900 9100 3.8 ND _ NA NA NA NA NA NA 13 11/11/98 M •4 19070 13.12 NM NM 17758 11/11/98 49 140 _ 560 1800 , ND ND NA NA NA NA NA NA 8 8/20/98 MW4 190 70 12,45 NM NM 178.25 820/99 120 4.40 930 3200 2.8 ND NA NA NA NA NA NA 7 5/21/98 M •4 190 70 10 82 NM NM 179.88 5/21/98 220 , 650 1200 4800 5.2 ND NA NA NA NA NA NA 9 2/17/98 M •4 _ 190 70 10.53 NM NM 180.17 2/17/99 260 970 990 4400 5.8 24 NA NA NA NA NA NA I1 11/20/97 MW.4 190 70 12 26 NM NM 178.44 11/20/97 140 440 810 2900 2 9 1.9 NA NA NA NA NA NA NA 0/28/97 M •4 190 70 1 1 97 NM NM 1 78.73 8/29/97 320 750.0 950.0 4100 0 ND 4.7 NA NA NA NA NA NA NA 6/22/97 MW4 190 70 10.30 NM NM 180 40 5/21,22/97 440 _1100.0 1300.0 5400.0 NO 13 NA NA NA NA NA NA 20 1/7/97 M •4 1 D0.70 9.02 ND 0.00 181.68 1/7/97 2990 6720.0 2840.0 16670.0 28 88 NA NA NA NA NA NA NS 10/8/98 MW.4 190 70 12 91 NO 0.00 177.79 10/8/96 1260 2010.0 1820 0 7580 0 10 52 NA NA NA NA NA NA NA 8/27/98 MW.4 _ 190 70 10.63 NO 0 00 180.07 8/27/96 2830 7110.0 3700 0 17900 0 36 150 NA NA NA NA NA NA NA 3/13/98 M •4 190 70 1 0 25 ND 0 CO 1 80.45 3/13/98 3500 6300 0 1 300 0 14000 0 70 78 NA NA NA NA NA NA NA 1/3/98 M •4 190.70 1 1 3 1 ND 0 00 1 79.39 1/4/96 5240 6500 0_ 3400 0 11300 0 NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA 9/20/95 , MW-4 190.70 13 78 NO 0 00 178.92 9/20/93 1350-. 880.0 _ 800.0 950 0 24 11 NA NA _ NA NA NA NA 27 7/17/96 MW4 190 70 12.21 NO 0 00 178 49 8/20/95 2900 3100 0 3800 0 10000 0 NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA 4/7/95 MW-4 190 70 + 12 57 __ ND 0 00 176 13 41795 106 6 7 5 3 25 0 NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA 11/3/94 M •4 190 70 15 28 NO 0 00 175.44 NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA 10/8/94 M •4 190 70 15 58 NO 0 00 175 14 1016/94 1590 37 0 2300.0 930.0 NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA 6/8/94 M •4 190.70 13.87 NO 0.00 178.83 8/8/94 1390 370.0 19900 18200 NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA 713/94 M •4 190 70 13.47 NO 0.00 177.23 313/94 2400 720 0 2400 0 2100 0 NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA 1,93 M •4 190 70 14.42 NO 0 00 176.28 12/31/93 1400 550 0 2300 0 1900 0 NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA r 46/93 MW-4 190 70 13 60 ND - 0.00 1 177 10 8/28/93 2440 831 0 2940 0 2653 0 NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA 8/6/92 M •4 190 70 14.34 NO 0.00 178.36 816192 2790 295 0 1360.0 1513 0 NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA • .:..�3 r .�._.r .• • • OIL COMPANY•FORMER TIGARD TEXACO St Sampled rt Oectected at or above method reporting lend of Meaeuted Analyzed 1t r i aliftWP•'. M67400 80-10(802o/S260.IPP61 • .•'' • PD. •:P►MI 1,3,S. 1,2.4. . I.opr.pyI n-Propyl Trkeathyl. Ttinathyl. W.9 W.ehead Oepth•to O.peh to Product Cornect.d- Dm*of Benzene Tula.. Ethye,.nzana Xylem. 1,2Dktdoro.th.n.1,2471romu.lhan.Nephtbel. M79E.,., a.naane benzene benzene lensene• OYeoNed• Okaol»d: Number Beretkn.(Ft.! W.tar/Fl.1 Product(Fta Thekne.r.I Ft.3GW EL.IFt-.1 Semp6ny. ' - (®CS: 10381 .. . Lead OAy9.n MW5 195 47 10 46 NM NM 175.01 NS NS NS 1 NS N5 NS NS NS NS NS NS NS NS NS 1/S MW-5 185 47 10.49 NM NM 174 98 NS NS NS NS NS NS NS NS NS NS NS NS NS NS NS 7 MW-S 185 47 10 07 NM NM 175 40 NS NS NS NS NS NS NS NS NS NS NS NS NS NS NS 1 MW-5 185 47 NM NM NM NM NS NS NS NS NS NS NS NS NS NS NS NS NS NS NS 1 MW-5 185 47 9.42 NM NM 1 77 05 N$ NS NS NS NS NS NS NS NS NS NS NS NS NS N5 1 MW-5 185 47 8 46 NM NM 177 01 NS NS NS NS 145 NS NS NS NS NS NS NS NS NS NS I MW5 185 47 6 35 NM NM 179.12 NS • N5 NS NS NS NS NS NS NS NS NS NS NS NS N' 1 MW-S 185 47 4 82 NM NM 190 65 2/11/99 3 1 2 2 2.0 40 NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA 2• 9 MW5 195.47 9.04 NM NM 178.43 11/12/98 20 46 4.1 29 14 NO NA NA NA NA NA NA NA 2.2 1 MW-5 185 47 8.41 NM NM 177.06 8/19/96 3.6 NO 1.2 3 NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA 1 MW5 185 47 8 82 NM NM 178.65 5/20/1998 6 4 1 6 7.2 25 2 3 ND NA NA NA NA NA NA ND 2 6 I MW-S 185 47 5.59 NM NM 1 78.99 2/17/98 3.5 1.7 4.5 15 2.6 ND NA NA NA NA NA NA NO 2.2 7 MW-5 185.47 8 64 NM NM 176.83 11/20/97 4 2.7 11 32 3 7 ND NA NA NA NA NA NA NA 2 5 1 MW-S 185 47 7.97 NM NM 177.50 8/29/97 3 7 4 6 38 0 56.0 3 3 NO NA NA NA NA NA NA NA 1 9 1 MW5 185 47 6 56 NM NM 178.91 5/21.22/97 13 1 I 11 0 12.0 4.3 ND NA NA NA NA NA NA 2 2 MW-5 185.47 5 92 ND 0 00 179 55 1/7/97 46 3.1 5 4 8 6 2 8 0 7 NA NA NA NA NA NA NA 0.12 MW-5 165 47 9.02 1-70 0 00 178.45 10/9/96 260 170.0 450 0 200.0 9.1 <2.0 NA NA NA NA NA NA NA 0.26 3 MW-S 185.47 6 84 ND 0 00 1 79 63 6/27/96 72 12.0 23 0 82.0 4 9 ND NA NA NA NA NA NA NA 1 5 3 MW-5 185 47 4 37 ND 0 00 181.10 3113/96 90 2 6 11 0 12 0 3.7 ND NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA MW-S 185 47 7 68 ND 0 00 177.79 1(4/96 13 9 0 17 0 18 0 NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA 3 MW-5 185 47 9 59 NO 0 00 1 75.86 9121/95 76 6.6 49 0 19.0 17 NO NA NA NA NA NA NA 4 1 4 I MW-S 185 47 8 10 NO 0 00 177 37 6/28/95 26 2.8 60 0 50 0 NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA MW-S 185 47 8 10 NO 0 00 177.37 4/7/95 109 8.7 5.3 25.0 NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA 3 MW-5 185 47 10.1 5 ND 0.00 175.32 t MW-5 185.47 1 1.1 2 NO 0.00 174 35 10/8/94 1 1 8 NO 6 9 1 7 NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA MW-5 185.47 8 99 NO 0 00 176 46 6/8/94 110 12.2 115.0 81.0 NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA MW5 3/3/94 100 19.0 180.0 201 0 NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA 0 MW-S 185 47 9 55 NO 0.00 175 92 12/31/93 86 10.0 111 0 75 0 NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA 3 MW-5 185 47 9 58 NO 0 00 175 89 9/26/93 98.6 ND 53 2 20.4 NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA MW-S 8/8/92 61 5 ND NO 17.8 NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA _ • PEAVEY OIL COMPANY•FORMER TIGARD TEXACO NS 4 Not Sampled NO . Not Oectected at or above method r•portIn9 Omit NM 4 Not Measured NA - Net Analyzed M lTigO NIBTND0 901O 8020(6380 1Mp • 0471 9.081: 13:3, 1.2:4. • • Iaapreprl n-Propil T1lmsdtyl_ Trlrnethyl Dete.of Well • Wdhad 04•15 m. Dapdtta• Predbet• Cemeoted� Dateet 8seaene Telu••• EthyDenrene XvIee.r 1,2•DIcI8.e have 1,2-Dbemoe15at.)48888684.. MT8E benzene, benaM• (ante b.n•n• 0/.abed 0•Clomping :Number 9es•dan IFW Water IR.I PJeitSVW14/181Yi1■MIftJ 13*i1J;_�i/k ',J38mpM19, ` f CS 1E1 • •' .. .t • Led 1 5/2/01 MW-B 195.62 16 48 NM NM 179.14 NS N9 NS NE NS NS NS NS NE NS N5 NS NS NS 1/23/01 M •8 195.82 16 49 NM NM 178.13 , NS NS NS NS NS NS NS NS NS NS NS NS NS NS 10/17/00 M •8 19562 15.44 NM NM 180.16 NS NS , NS NE NS NS NS NS NS NS NS NS NS NS '7/00 MW.6 195.82 10.82 NM NM 185.00 NS NS NS NS NE NS NS NS N8 NS NS _ NS NS NS //99 M •8 195 82 13.72 NM NM , 181.90 NE NS NS NS NS NS NE NS NS NS NS NS NS NS 25/39 MW-8 195 62 13•1 3 NM NM 182 49 8/25199 5.5 ND 11 2.1 NA NA 14 NO NA NA NA NA NA 5/17/99 MW-0 198.62 10.07 NM NM 165.55 NS " NS NS NS NS NS NS NS NS NS IJS NS NS NS 2/11/99 MW.6 195132 894 NM NM 186.68 2/11/99 ND ND 1.4 ND NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA ND 11/11/98 M •6 195.82 14 30 NM NM 181.32 NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA 4 9/20/96 M •S 195.82 13 34 NM NM _ 182.28 9/20/98 ND 2 5 NO ND NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA 5 5/21/98 M •6 195.82 11.99 NM NM 153.73 5/21/98 1.2 ND ND ND ND ND NA NA NA NA NA • NA 9 2/17/98 MW8 195 82 11 57 NM NM 184.05 2/17/98 _ 3.6 21 3.9 23 NO ND NA NA NA NA NA NA 8 11/20/97 M •S 195.82 13.32 NM NM 182.30 11/20/97 ND NO NO 1.5 NO ND NA NA NA NA NA NA _ NA 6/28/97 M •8 195 62 13.69 NM NM 181.74 9/28/57 ND ND ND ND ND NO NA NA NA NA NA NA NA 5/22/97 M •8 195.82 11.12 _ NM NM 184.50 5/21,22/97 95 580.0 480.0 _3200 0 ND ND NA NA NA NA NA NA 39 1/7/97 M •6 _ 195.62 8.60 ND 0.00 187.02 1/7/97 380 1320,0 720.0 5240.0 ND NO NA NA NA NA NA NA NA 10/9/98 M •6 195.62 13.38 NO 0.00 182.24 10/9/98 520 740.0 390.0 4300.0 ND NO NA NA NA NA NA NA NA 6/27/98 M •8 195.82 11.30 + ND 0.00 184.32 8/27/98 230 810.0 90.0 3450 0 ND ND NA NA NA NA NA NA NA 3/13/98 M •8 195.62 8.66 ND 000 188.98 3/13/98 490 2400.0 440.0 4600.0 ND NO NA NA NA NA NA NA NA 1/3/98 MW8 195.62 1215 ND 000 183.47 1/4/98 1100 4330.0 14700 8530.0 NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA 9/20/95 MW8, 195.52 14.77 ND 000 180.85 9/20/95 1170 1100.0 560.0 11800 0.9 NO NA NA NA NA NA NA 71 7/17/95 M •8 _ 195.82 12.84 ND 0.00 182.78 8/29/95 1900 5800.0 6200.0 13000.0 NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA 4/7/95 M •S 195 82 12 54 ND _ 0 00 163.08 4/7/95 1020 1900.0 9 0 7060.0 NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA 11/3/94 MW-6 195 62 16 40 ND 0 00 179 22 NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA 10/6/94 M •S 195 52 _ 16.52 ND 0.00 179.10 , 10/6/94 510 910.0 625.0 _11900 0 NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA • OIL COMPANY•FORMER TIGARD TEXACO t Sampled t Dettelted at or above method reporting limit It Measured ■t Analyzed ,i,'.MRTi!00' ata7N0G$01o/BO9oa1iti6iPra i • :il 7411 UFe)' iir4ell . 7 3 3,A+ 4 4> ,'. , .r .i ; !'. la*prapyl nfrapXl :TTIMathyl' 1h6.dj W.9 W.WMad Depth to .OapthlP Predutt (lppre4tF0 O.aue! BwMrt Tp4ueee EthyAem.pn Xylrwe 1.3DIalbmatbana ti4;.9:4wepet)MM N.444 A+l�ae MTB6 Rbe,rw. 1hgW1M ' #eta.Plt; bartaMM DUetood d)hMM1: Number Oavatkn:IEtl1: ,W.toc •ta Produet.(Ft:I T leknaulFt)13WSEL:IFC)ii;SrmpBnq aS00) IED81,,'' .. .W:! [L. .iOaygun.': MW-7 198.98 NM NM NM NM NS NS NS NS .. NS NS NS NS NS NS NS NS NS NS NS MW•7 198.98 NM NM NM NM NS NS NS NS NS NS NS NE NS NS NS NS NS NS NE M •7 198.98 17.05 NM NM 181.93 N8 NS NS NE NS NS NS NS NS NS NS NS NS NS NS M •7 198 98 13.55 NM NM 186.43 NS NS NS NS NS NS NS NS NS NS NS NS NS NS NS MW-7 198.98• 15.30 NM NM 183.68 NS NE NS NS NS NS NS NS NS NS NS NS NS NS NS M •7 198.98 14 85 NM NM 184.33 NS NS NS NS NS NS NS NS NS NS NS NS NS NS NS M •7 198.98 i 12.33 NM NM 188.65 NS NS NS NS NS NS NS NS NS NE NS NS NS NS N: MW.? 198.98 10.98 NM NM 188.00 NI NS NE NS NS NS NS NS NS NS NS NS • NS NS NS ) M •7 198.96 15.82 NM NM 183.16 NS NS NS NS NS NS NS NS NS _ NS NE NS NS NS NS M •7 198.98 14.82 NM NM 184.18 NS NB NS NS NS NS NS NS NE NS NS NS NS NS NS M •7 198.98 13.25 NM NM 186.73 NS NS NS NS NS NS NS NS NS NS NS NS NS NS NS MW-7 198.98 12.72 NM NM 188.28 2/17/98 ND _ ND NO ND ND ND NA NA NA NA NA NA ND 3.8 7 M •7 198.98 15.78 NM NM 183.20 NS NS NS NE NS N8 NE NS NS NS NS NS NS NS NS M •7 198.98 14.43 NM NM 194.55 NS NS NS NS NS NS NS NS NS NS NS NS NS NS NS M •7 198,98 12.45 NM NM 186.53 5/21,22/97 NO ND ND .- ND NO ND NA NA NA NA NA NA NO NA M •7 191.98 9.88 ND 0,00 189.12 1/7/97 NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA 2.9 M •7 198,98 15.02 ND 0.00 183,96 10/9198 NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA 1.09 MW-7 198.98 12.86 ND 0.00 188.121 8/27/98 NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA 11.3 M •7 198.98 10.13 NO 0.00 1 88.95 3/13/98 NO NO NO ND ND ND NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA MW-7 198.98 13.84 NO 0 00 IBS 14 1/4/98 ND 0.87 ND 1.3 NA NA - NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA MW-7 198.98 18.46 ND 0.00 182.52 9/20/95 2.9 3.7 0.7 7.3 ND - NO NA NA NA NA NA NA ND 7 MW7 198.98 14.81 ND 0.00 184.17' 8/28/95 1 3.0 NO 7.2 NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA M •7 198 98 15.21 NO 0.00 183.77 4/7/95 NO ND NO NO NA NA NA NA _ NA NA NA NA NA NA MW-7 198.98 18.18 ND 0.00 180.80 MW 7 198,98 18.55 ND 0 00 180.43 10/9/94 NO NO NO ND NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA PEAVEY OIL COMPANY•FORMER TIGARD TEXACO NS - Not Sampled ND a Not Dectected at or above method reporting limit NM a Not Measured NA - Not Analyzed ' MfT1g0 ME1400 9010/89204280(PPM 7421 PP81 1 . - t • AL,�1 , z 2 4* . r91 1 l ldwe e ;• Data.1. w I WelIt..d Oepth o Capita to .Pledaal•: Comeat'd Oates!' .Semen. Toluene Ethybitaane X yter■ 1,2•ODaaraahene 1,2-Diromeethane N aph l6alen. MTBE b4tNen► bonze. Willem, o a eaM,. :.•.Dk.ened OI m,aeitli;: 'Nembet 19W.Wn lgt.i Weller 01'0 ` ; lFt.I Sampng," e tE9 t tEOCt it+ei 5/2/01 SAWS 165.38 11 63 NM NM 173.75 NS NS NS NS NS NS NS NS NS N9 NS NS NS NS 1/23/01 M •9 165.38 11 54 NM NM 173.84 NS NS NS NS NS NS NS NE NS NS NS N8 NE NS 10/17/00 MW-6 186,38 11.19 _ NM NM 174.16 NS NS N6 NS NI NI NS N8 NS N9 NS N6 NS NS 7/00 M •6 195.38 NM NM NM NM NS NS , NS NS NI N5 NS NE NS NS NE NS NS NS /99 MW-I3 155.38 9 81 NM NM 176.77 NS NS NS NS NS NS NS NS NS NS NS NS NS NS - or 15/99 M •5 185.36 9.17 NM NM 176.21 NS NE NS NS N8 NS NS N6 NS NS NS NS NS NS 5/17/99 MW-6 185.38 7 45 NM NM 177.93 NS ' NS NE NS NS I NS NS NS NS NS NE NS NS r1S 2/10/99 M •5 185.39 5.99 NM NM 179.50 NS NS NS NS NS NE NS NS NS NS _ NE NS NS N9 11/11/98 MW-11 185.39 10.31 NM NM 176.07 8/20/99 NO ND ND ND NO _ ND NA NA NA NA NA NA ND 6/19/99 M •6 198.38 NM NM NM NM 8/20/96 NS NS NS NS NS NS NS NS NS NS NS NI NS 5/21/99 WAIT 195 38 NM NM NM NM 5/21/99 NS NS NS NS NS NS NS NI NS N6 NS NS NS 2/17/99 MW5 195 39 9.00 NM _ NM 179.39 2/17/98 NO NO ND NO ND NO NA NA NA NA NA NA NO 11/20/97 M •6 185.38 _ 9.26 NM NM 17612 .11/20/97 NO NO NO 1.2 ND ND NA NA NA NA NA NA NA 9/28/97 MW6 195.35 9.56 NM NM 178.82 8/29/97 NO ND NO ND ND ND NA NA NA NA NA NA NA 5/22/97 MW-11 186.38 7.63 NM NM 177.65 5/21.22/97- NO _. ND ND ND , ND NO NA NA NA NA NA NA ND 1/7/97 M •9 195.38 6.40 ND • 0.00 178.98 1/7/97 NO NO NO ND ND ND NA NA NA NA NA NA NA 10/8/96 M •a 195.38 10.49 ND 0.00 174.89 e- 10/9/98 NO NO ND 1 2 ND NO NA NA NA NA NA NA NA 6/27/96 MINI• 185.38 7 82 ND 0.00 177.58 6/27/96 NO ND NO ND NO ND NA NA NA NA NA NA NA. 3/13/98 WW1 195.38 5.23 ND 0.00 160.18 3/13/96 NO ND ND NO NO ND NA NA NA NA NA NA NA 1/3/98 M •8 185.39 8.12 ND 000 _ 177.29 1/4/98 NO 1.2 2.1 84 NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA 'NA 9/20/96 MW-a 185.38 11.23 ND 0.00 174.15 9/20/96 1 2.2 1.1 5.4 NO ND NA NA NA NA NA NA NO 7/17/95 MW-11 196.38 9.45 ND 0.00 175.93 6/26/96 0.9 4.4 1.9 21.0 NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA 4/7/95 M •8 185.38 9.35 ND 0.00 _ 176.03 4/7/95 ND ND ND NO NA _ NA NA _ NA _ NA NA NA NA _ NA 11/3/94 M •8 185.38 11.45 NO 0.00 173.93 _ • 10/9/94 M •8 185 38 12.32 NO _ 0.00 173.06 10/6/94 ND NO NO NO NA j NA 1 NA I NA I NA I NA I NA I NA I NA I L.. i i..... . J )IL COMPANY-FORMER TIGARD TEXACO :Sampled t Deeteeted at or above method reporting IlmIt I Measured t Analyzed }AtlsNQIX ., .. - , . . ;i i∎ MI!I1t00 wtweoaaieASStenn - - • 44x}04N11 irreel 13.6+ ', W•B: Wdhea4: D ptt• D•wh to Prodeot .:Cam.a.d ,Set.of ;6smm,t. .Te+ddens Et!*: Xyl.n■■ t,2 O+pld..es e l 1 I4.i:4441M t4IM'M!Me+ M1*E (1Mian. b.ne n. trtW.e D■;44tvn4 PI!eoW.>e Number. •9ovoth.I?N W88:8:100 Med4s8(8t i 11kkn.e.lF.t.OW EL•IPt'.3„:18.mplYq. i. . . :1 48DC1.:.. . fW6fS .. :rased : : kONyie4••MW-B 187.26 11.23 NM NM 178..03 4/1/02 50 NO®1.0 85 21 ND Q 1.0 NO • 1.0 27 NO®1.0 40 9.8 9.2 42 NA NA , MW-9 187.28 13.81 NM NM 173.85 512/01 90 ND @ 1.0 2.4 1 8 NO @ 1.0 NO @ 1.0 ..NO @ 6.0 ND @ 1.0 71 23 1.4 1.1 3 NS M •9 187.26 13.38 NM NM 173.90 NS N8 NS NB NS NS _ NS NS NS NS NS NS NS NS NS 3 M •9 187.28 12.90 NM NM 174.36 10/17/00 72 NO @ 1.0 6.5 2.4 NO @ 1.0 ND @ 1.0 - 17 NO @ 1.0 94 24 3.8 2.7 NA NA MW9 187.28 NM NM NM NM NS NS NB NS N8 NS NS NS NB _ NS NS NS N9 NS NS MWB 187.26 11.65 NM NM 175.61 12/2/90 200 NO 1.7 10 ND ND 15 NO NA NA NA NA NA N/ MW-9 187.28 11.11 NM NM 176.15 5/28/99 81 NO N0 18 NA NA NO NO NA NA NA NA NA t MW-9 187.28 15.87 , NM NM 171.59 8/17/99 NO ND ND NO ND NO NA NA NA NA NA NA 3 Na M •B 187 26 14.32 NM NM 172.94 2/11/99 NO _ NO ND ND ND NO NA NA NA NA NA NA 16 9.0 W9 8 M 187.26 14.49 NM NM 172.77 11/12/88 NO ND ND NO ND ND , NA NA NA NA NA NA 9 7.8 1 MW-9 187.28 11.08 NM NM 178.18 8/19/98 230 42 48 170 ND ND NA NA NA NA NA NA 20 1.2 i MW-9 187.28 9.86 NM NM 177.40 5/21/98 93 41 38 150 2.5 ND NA NA NA NA NA NA 34 2.3 i MW9 187.28 9.52 NM NM 177.74 2/17/98 86 84 38 • 200 3.4 ND NA NA NA NA NA NA 28 2 7 MW-9 187.26 11.14 NM NM 178.12 11/20/97 77 12 14 40 6.7 ND NA NA NA _ NA NA NA NS 1.2 ' M •9 187.26 10.78 NM NM 176.48 B/29/97 58 46.0 66.0 170.0 7 S NO - NA NA NA NA NA NA NS <1 MWB 187.26 9.25 NM NM 178.01 5/21,22/97 45 35.0 110.0 260.0 4 8 ND s NA NA NA NA NA NA 24 <1 M •B 187.28 10.81 ND 0.00 176.38 1/7/87 0,82 ND NO 1.68 7.7 NO NA NA NA NA NA NA NA 0.22 I MW•9 187.26 13.84 NO 0.00 173.82 10/9/98 480 9.8 23.0 35.0 35 ND NA NA NA NA NA NA NA 0.52 I MW-9 187.28 9.80 NO 0 00 177.66 8/27/96 4230 2410 0 2090.0 6050.0 25 ND NA _ NA _ NA NA NA NA NA 0.01 I MW-9 187.26 7.38 NO 0 00 179 88 3/13/96 4800 3200.0 2200.0 5500.0 31 NO NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA M •9 187.28 10.19 ND 0.00 177.07 1/3/96 8180 7020.0 4520.0 11800.0 NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA I MW-9 187.26 12.43 ND 0.00 174.83 9/20/95 2030 780.0 _ 810.0 840.0 34 NO NA NA NA NA NA NA 89 1 I MW-9 167.26 11.02 NO 0.00 176.24 8/28/95 12000 2300.0 57000 3500.0 NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA mw-9 187.28 11.31 ND 0.00 175.95 4/7/95 1577 1965.0 1844.0 4167.0 NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA 1 MW-9 187.28 13.79 NO 0 00 173.47 _ _ MW9 187.26 14.09 ND 0.00 173.17 10/8/94 3780 63.0 2585.0 1900.0 NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA L ti __ .� 0411•111 ._. _ .. ._..__.. - PEAVEY OIL COMPANY•FORMER TIGARD TEXACO NS .Not Sampled ND iv Not Dectected at or above method reporting limit NM ■Not Measured NA .Not Analyzed iiSMYi71CbrH .. . .... -'8@111787{ > :::i:::::;:.:;.:::.:::: is ati 2Pii':ii" .. ::1 .1' tl7:. t:::i:: 1.: .I. :.fiea d1 Diu of: !Vl4Mi . .1444•:.. ;i,�11f�1a` ,: h9M94tt ,CeAtYitlfd .'6* fiifii Efh#Y11M1di z41wY 12DWtil,44,0 !'1:2�ne NaphtB.lhw. K1"f04 �I IM,4 1MIr■M i*B44ee •':.,.,,8:I*ii, ' fiWaffnd.` `i7 ModugtiP I TkY ;•.1• _ OwgtMt'' MMY � '1t�MSid'in�IF1lI�1NMtt'.�) 4jgtb.IMf�fiYY`F7J.(PY.7 SaihplMp. ._ •�� • '�t®Ci. It37IBl � ... - i�°'.'111.1?i:�;iE .... ...'i . .:. :�: °i:�:..� ...... ......•,.. . -: Lead -C 512/01 M •IO 196.92 14.78 NM NM 172.16 NE N9 , NE NS NS NS NS NS NE NS NS NS NS NS 1123/01 M •10 188.92 NM NM NM NM NE N6 _ NE NS NS NS NS NS NS NS NS NS NS NS 10/17/00 M •10 186.92 14.09 NM NM 172.83 NS NS NS NS 1.15 NS NS NS NE NS NS N9 NS N5 - 7/00 MW.10 186.92 NM NM NM NM NS NS NS NS NS NS _ NS NS NS NS NS NS NS NS //99 M •10 188.92 12.87 NM _ NM 174.05 NS NS NS NS NS NS NS NS NS NS NE NS NS NS 0/25/99 MW 10 186.92 12.38 NM NM 174 54 NS NS NS NS NS NE NS NS NS NS NS NS NS NS 5/17/99 M •10 186,92 10.39 NM NM 176.53 NS NS NS NS NS NS NS NS NS NS NS NS NS NS 2/10/99 M •10 186.92 9.74 NM NM 177.18 NS NS NS NS NS NS NS NS NS NS NS _ NS NS NS 11/11/98 M •10 188,92 13.56 NM NM 173.38 NS _ NS NS NS NS NS NS NS NS NS NS NS NS NS 8/19/98 M •10 188.92 12.33 NM NM 174.59 8/19/98 NS NS NS NS NS NS NS NS NS N5 NS NS NS 5121/96 MW 10 168.92 11.35 NM NM 178.67 5/21/98 NS _ NE NE NS NS NS NS NS NS NS NS NS NS 2/17/98 M •10 186.92 10.90 NM NM 176.02 2/17/98 ND ND NO ND NO ND NA NA NA NA NA NA ND 11/20/97 M •10 186.92 12.52 NM NM 174.40 NS NS NS NS NS NS NS NS NS NS NS NS NS NS B/26/97 M •10 186.92 12.04 NM _ NM 174.89 N5 NS N5 NB NS NS NS NS NS NS NS NS NS NS 6/22/97 M •10 186.92 10.58 NM NM 178.34 5/21,22/97 ND ND ND ND ND NO NA NA NA NA NA NA 4 1/7/97 M •10 188.92 10.25 ND 0.00 178.67 _ 1/7/97 NA NA NA NA NA NA _ NA NA NA NA NA NA NA W 10/8/98 M 10 186.92 12.79 NO 0.00 174.13 10/8/98 NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA 6/27/98 M •10 186.92 10.93 ND 0.00 175.99 6/27/96 NA _ NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA 3/13/98 MW 10 186.92 8.95 NO 0.00 177 97 3/14/98 ND ND NO 0,9 ND ND NA NA NA NA NA NA NA 1/3/98 MW10 188.92 l 11 59 ND 0.00 175.33 1/3/98 0.9 092 , 0.91 _ 4.4 NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA 9/20/95 MW 10 186 92 13 83 NO 0.00 173.09 9/21/95 ND 1 0 ND 2.4 NO ND NA NA NA NA NA NA ND 7/17/95 MW 10 186.92 12.32 NO 0.00 174.60 6/28/98 6.1 6.6 11 0 33 0 NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA 4/7/95 MW 10 186.92 12.73 ND 0.00 174.19_ 4/7/95 NO ND ND ND NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA 11/3/94 MW 10 186 92 15.13 NO 0.00 171.79 M •10 10/6/94 NO ND ND NO NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA PIA tom: )IL COMPANY•FORMER TIGARD TEXACO t Sampled t Dectected at or above method reporting limit 4 Measured NyNaD: t Analysed 7471 Ivpe7 'lPlM1� M W10;80204260■ • M[T00fMaT 1,3.5. 1,2.4- Iwptopyl :nfnepill TrYeethyI Trie.thyl' W. W.Wad Depth to D.pah to Product Connoted O.e.v Ben:na Dille.. Ethyaunzeno Xylerre 1.2,Obthoreaduns 1,2>Obrannethan.Naphtholl*"Ii. MTBE bonze+.* bs o. banana hanzana Diseased Dissolved Worbat ElavatIon IFtl Wow(Ft.) ProductiFt.1 Thickness IFt.)OW EL.IFt I Sampling ... - t, .. ..:';(111161•.,• .•I1314S. .i l'' - .. Lead Baypan 1 MW II ABND ABND ABND ABND ABNO MW 11 ABND ABNO ABND ABNO ABND I M •11 ABNO ABND ABND ABND ABND MW 11 ABND ABNO ABND ABND ABNO MW.1 I ABND ABND ABND ABND ABNO MW11 ABND ABNO ABNO ABND ABND MWI 1 ABNO ABND ABND ABND ABND • MW-11 ABNO ABNO ABND ABND ABNO . I MW-11 ABND ABND ABND ABNO ABNO M •11 ABNO ABNO ABND ABND ABND MW11 ABND ABND ABND ABNO ABND MW11 ABNO ABND ABND ABND ABND 7 MW 11 ABND ABND ABND ABND ABND M •11 ABND ABNO ABND ABNO ABND MW 11 ABND ABND ABNO ABND ABND M •11 48ND ABND ABND ABND ABND MW II ABND ABND ABND ABND ABND MW1t ARNO ABND ABND ABND ABND • M •11 ABND ABND ABND ABND ABND NM.11 ABNO ABND ABND ABND ABND ■ MW 11 ABND ABND ABNO ABND ABNO MW-11 LEND LEND ABND ARNO LEND MW-11 ABND ABND ABND ABND ABND • MW.i1 ABND LEND LEND ABND ABND . .aaM■i - PEAVEY OIL COMPANY•FORMER TIGARD TEXACO NS - Not Sampled NO - Not D.ct.ct.d at or above method reporting limit NM - Not Measured •""^ NA -Not ArulyaW ;',_ ARTHOelY011i , ^'Afll(M� 1,3,3.• • 1..pnp1l : n•PFepv1 Ttbratbyl • Ttieathyl Date of W.8. Miami. 0apth to Oapfl to Prode.t Corra.ad Data.! Became Toluene Ethyaa.neen. Xltlw. 1.2.Dlehbro.thans S,2-OMwnoatba.w NUplifb.lene WILE •bula.ne Wotan.. boom... Morena DittoMd DI Ae.gbp Number Be.e 1lbi. Wear lFt.I Product lF9.1 7Mebneee IFt1OW El.AFt.i Sampling .. t®C9 =sib •-ice, _ 1 y, ., 1e.4 C 5/2/01 MW-12 18500 14 58 NM NM 170 42 NS N5 NS NS NS NS NS NS NS NS NS NS NS NS 1/23/01 MW-12 185 00 NM NM NM NM NS NS NS NS NS NS NS NS NS NS NS NS NS NS 10/17/00 MW.12 195 00 14 1 8 NM NM 170 84 NS NS NS NS NS NS NS NS NS NS NS NS NS NS -7/00 MW 12 195 00 NM NM NM NM NS NS NS NS NS NS NS NS NS NS NS NS NS NS '99 MW•12 195.00 13 05 NM NM 171.95 NS NS NS NS NS NS NS NS NS NS NS NS NS NS _5199 MW-12 1 65 00 12.78 NM NM 172.22 NS NS NS NS NS NS NS NS NS NS NS NS NS NS 5/17/99 MW.12 195 00 11 04 NM NM 173.98 NS ' NS NS NS NS NS NS NS NS NS NS NS NS NS 2/10/99 MW-12 185 00 10 35 NM NM 174 85 2/11/99 NO ND NO NO NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA 11/11/98 MW-12 18500 13.44 NM NM 171.58 11/11/98 NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA 9/19/98 MW 12 185.00 12.69 NM NM 172.31 8119/98 2.2 ND ND NO NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA 5/20/98 MW-12 185.00 1 1.87 NM NM 173.33 5/20/98 ND ND NO NO ND NO NA NA NA NA NA NA NO 2/17/98 MW-12 188 00 11 35 NM NM 173.65 2/17/98 ND NO NO NO NO NO NA NA NA NA NA NA NO 11/20/97 M •12 18500 12.73 NM NM 172.27 11/20/97 ND ND ND NO NO ND NA NA NA NA NA NA NA 8/28/97 MW.12 188.00 1 1 22 NM NM 1 73.78 8/28/97 ND NO NO ND 2.8 ND NA NA NA NA NA NA NA 5/22/97 MW.12 185.00 11.22 NM NM 173.78 5/21,22/97 ND NO NO ND 1.3 NO NA NA NA NA NA NA 2 1/7/97 MW-12 18500 11 99 NO 000 173.04 1/7/97 ND ND ND NO ND NO NA NA NA NA NA NA NA 10/8/99 MW.12 195 00 14.90 NO 0 00 170.10 10/9/96 19 ND 4.1 1.0 11 NO NA NA NA NA NA NA NA 9/27/98 MW-12 185 00 11 51 NO 0 00 173.49 8/27/98 410 4.9 32.0 13.0 16 ND NA NA NA NA NA NA NA 3/13/98 MW-12 1 85 00 9 52 ND 0 00 175.48 3/14/98 340 2.6 3.2 4.9 35 ND NA NA NA NA NA NA NA 1/3/99 MW-12 18500 11.78 NO 0.00 173.22 1/4/98 300 211 9.5 3.8 NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA 9120/95 MW-12 185 00 13.87 ND 0.00 171 13 9/20/95 630 9 0 42.0 7.1 36 NO NA NA NA NA NA NA 5 7/17/95 MW-12 185.00 12.59 NO 0.00 172.41 6,28195 430 8.0 140 21.0 NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA 4/7/95 MW-12 185 00 12.85 ND 0 00 172 1 5 4/7/95 55.5 1 6.3 14.3 1 6 8 NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA I 1/3/94 MW-12 185 00 14 83 NO 0.00 1 70.1 7 10/9/94 420 3 4 22.0 6 9 NA NA NA NA NA 1 NA NA NA NA �.._.. ..4 t•,,. . • DIL COMPANY-FORMER TIGARD TEXACO t Sampled 1 Dentected at or above method reporting limit I Measured t Analyzed ".MrdTPICKEiiiil ,ii.i . :i ...!:. .;.J.:. .. M[TNOO 601O1902042a0!p.{/ ''•• .. 7421 IPPp 7lpMli ',.Y. • t.oprepyl' n-Propyl Trieethyl.. .! e.dryI W,8 Wellhead Deptht re D.pth to Product Corrected Date et Boru.ne. Tulu.e. EthyBenzene %ylwe 1.2.O1ohloroethene 1,2.0Sremoethene Npkthalene MTBE benzene benzene benzene. ',benzene CbeoNed OYuol.ed Number Elevation(Ft.F Water(R.) Product lFt.l Thickness IFt:7GW EL.1St) S.nr rg MC) 1E081 -Least Oxygen• • MW.13 184 48 11 OS NM NM 173 43 NS NS NO NS NS NS NS N5 NS NS NS NS NE NS IS MW-13 184 48 10 95 NM NM 173 53 NS NS NS NS NS NS NS _ NS NS NS NS NS NS NS IS MW.13 184 48 10 64 NM NM 173 84 NS NS NS NS NS NS NS .. NS NS _ NS NS NS NS NS NS MW.13 18446 NM NM NM NM NS NS NS NS NS NS NS _ NS NS NS _ NS NS NS NS NS MW.13 184 48 9 32 NM NM 175.16 NS NS NS NS NS NS _ NS NS NS NS NS NS NS NS NS MW.13 184 48 9 03 NM NM 175 45 NS NS NS NS NS NS NS NS NS NS NS NS NS NS 145 MW.13 184 48 12 03 NM NM 172 45 NS- NS NS NS NS NS NS NS NS NS NS NS NS NS NS MW 13 184 48 10 28 NM NM 174 20 NS NS NS NS NS NS NS NS NS NS NS 4- NS NS NS '45 MW.13 184 48 9 66 NM NM 174 82 NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA .- NA NA NA 8 2 MW.13 184 48 8 135 NM NM 175 63 8/19/98 ND ND NO NO NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NO NA MW.13 184 48 744 NM NM 177 04 5/20/98 NO ND ND NO NO NO NA NA NA NA _ NA NA 2 2.6 MW.13 184.48 7 23 NM NM 177.25 2/17/98 ND 3 6 NO 5.4 NO ND NA NA NA NA _ NA NA NO 1 9 MW.13 18448 8.75 NM NM 175.73 11/20/97 NO 1 1 ND 2.4 ND NO NA NA NA NA NA NA NA 2.0 MW-13 184 48 8 60 NM NM 175 86 6/29/97 NO NO ND I ND ND NO NA NA NA NA NA NA NA 2 3 MW-13 184.48 7 10 NM NM 177 38 5/21.22/97 ND NO ND ND 1 1 NO NA NA NA _ NA NA NA 4 1 3 MW-13 184 48 12.58 NO 0 00 171 90_ 1/7/87 ND ND ND ND 5.9 ND NA NA _ NA _ NA _ NA NA NA 4 04 MW-13 1 84.48 11 40 ND 0 00 173,08 10/9/96 4.1 ND 1.5 0.6 2.1 ND NA NA _ NA _ NA NA NA NA 0.11 MW-13 184 48 7 56 ND 0 00 178.92_ 6/27/98 180 170 0 1110 0 1170.0_ ND NO NA NA NA NA NA NA NA 0 01 MW.13 184 48 5 10 NO 0 00 179.38 3/14/96 150 130 0 740 0 1400.0 2 ND NA _ NA NA NA NA NA NA NA MW-1.3 194 48 7.74 ND 0.00 178.74 1/4/98 24 0.82 ND 128 0 NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA MW-13 184 48 10.20 NO 0 00 174 28 9121/95 340 99 0 1200 0 1080 0 1 2 ND NA NA NA .- NA NA NA 12 1 6 MW-13 184 48 8.74 ND 0 00 175 74 6/20/95 332 132 0 455 0 411.0 NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA - -- �- PEAVEY OIL COMPANY•FORMER TIGARD TEXACO NS .Not Sampled NO .Not Deot.Oted at or above method reporting limit NM.Not Measured NA-Not Analyzed ^,.MIySIO0 .' ,. ::I IMtiqusuibl!OdO/S 0 P001. ",f 74421 IPPth '136. 1a4. i‘eppipY4 b-liepyl 1'tbrwptyl iullbabyl Data I •Wa8 i.!WsOMid, Depol/r OMdtta Prodube Corniieted D..e8 2S01M1 tdlu«ii Efhyaithwei XWrlwi'':1.7 Pklderiatbahs .2•piieme.dliin"ti*iiai1.1N M'19E` beeeen. blilluhe: fehNd0::::• P**N/1. -i DYieMd e - a OWabq Numbs El vaden:et.f W.eetii.I::Pe dultlPtIit9elid.itilirilaW EL.lpc1::$imelgit _ .cltCt . 1®el. '3 5/2101 MW.14 183,80 12.39 NM NM 171 41 NS NS NS NS NS NS NS NS NS NS NS NS NS NS 1123101 M •14 183,80 NM NM NM NM NS NS NS NS NS NS NS NS NB NS NS NB NS N8 10/17/00 MW-14 183.80 12.15 NM NM 171,85 NS NS NB NS NS NS NS NS NS NS NS NS NS NB '17/00 M •14 183.80 NM NM NM NM NS NS NS NB NS NS NS NS NS NS NS NS NS NS 2/99 MW 14 183.80 11.46 NM NM 172.34 NS NS NS NS NS NS NS NS NS NS NS NS NS NS _,26/99 MW.14 183.80 11.48 NM NM 172.32 NS NS NS NS NS NS NS NS NS NS NS ' NS NS NB 5/17/99 MW.14 183,80 10.88 NM NM 172.94 NS • NS NS NS NS NS NS NB NS NS NS NS NS NS 2/10/99 MW.14 183.80 1050 NM NM 173.30 NS NS NS NS NS NS NS NS NS NS NB NS NS NS 11/11/98 M •14 183.80 11.42 NM NM 172.38 NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA ND 8/19/98 MW.14 183.80 11.48 NM NM 172,34 8/19/98 NO ND ND ND NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA ND 5/20/98 MW 14 183.80 9.04 NM NM 174.78 6/20/98 NO NO ND NO ND ND NA NA NA NA NA NA NO 2/17/98 MW-14 183.80 10.67 NM NM 173,13 2/17/98 ND ND NO 1,7 4.8 ND NA NA NA NA NA NA ND 11/20/97 M •14 183,80 10.60 NM NM 173,20 11/20/97 NO NO ND 1.3 NO ND NA NA NA NA NA NA NA 8/28/97 M •14 153,50 11,40 NM NM 172.40 8/29/97 ND ND ND ND 1 ND NA NA NA NA NA NA NA S/22/97 MW.14 183,80 14,27 NM NM 189.53 5/21,22/87 2.8 ND NO 2.0 9.4 ND NA NA NA NA NA NA 7 1/7/97 MW-14 183,80 11.20 ND 0.00 172,50 1/7/97 0.81 0.81 ND 4.6 1.79 ND NA NA NA NA NA NA NA 10/9/98 M •14 183.80 12,93 ND 0.00 170.87 10/9/95 10 3.2 15.0 30,0 33 ND NA NA NA NA NA NA NA 5/27/98 M •14 183.80 10.40 ND 0.00 173.40 6/27/86 34 7.3 1.9 81.0 0 ND NA NA NA NA NA NA NA 3/13/96 MW.14 183.80 7.88 NO 0.00 175.94 3/13/98 3.7 1.3 0.9 8.9 1.8 ND NA NA NA NA NA NA NA 1/3/96 MW.14 183.80 9,93 NO 0.00 173.87 1/4/96 100 51.0 340.0 960.0 NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA 9/20/95 M •14 153.50 12.08 NO 0.00 171.72 9/21/95 25 9.2 1230.0 2230.0 66 ND NA NA NA NA NA NA B 7/17/95 M •14 183.80 10,68 ND 0.00 173,12 6/21/95 144 22.9 26.7 20.7 NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA . L_.._J e._ Ina W 311.COMPANY-FORMER TIGARD TEXACO t Sampled t Dectected at or above method reporting limn ■1 Measured t Analyzed etnHOO9uloreaaaaaaolFF6} ` '+411(951.111 y Ieop.eprl n-Propyl Trke•thYl Tebwethyl W.9 Wellhead Depth to Depth to Product Cor.wcted Detest. Benzene Toluca.I Ethylb.oz.n. Xyl.fr. 1.2DkNoroet.n.1,2-0bseme.th.ne Napetael.n. MTSE b.naem benzene beeaeee berteene d DaMoleW. Needs., El./stlen(Ft.) Wear(Ft.( Redact lFt.l Thickness IFt1GW El..IFt.I S4.4116,5 rt3DCl 1E1361 - AIM MW.15 184 27 NM NM NM NM NS NS NS NS NS NS NS '15 NE NS NS N$ NS NS NS MW.15 184 27 NM NM NM NM NS NS NS NS NS NS NS NS NS IJS NS NS NS NS NS I MW15 184 27 14 45 NM NM 169 82 NS NE NS NS NS NE NS NE NS NS NS NS NS NS NS MW-IS 18427 NM NM NM NM NS NS NS NE NS NS NS NE NS NS NS NS NS NS NS MW.15 18427 NM NM NM NM NS NS NS NS NS NE NS NS NS NS NS NS NS NS NS MW.15 184 27 1 344 NM NM 170 83 NS NS NS NS NS NS NS NS NS NS N8 NS NS NS NS MW.15 184 27 1 1 73 NM NM 1 72.54 NS - NS NS NS NS NS NS NS NS NS NS NS NS NS NE MW-15 184 27 11 16 NM NM 173.11 NS NS NS NS NS NS N5 NS NS NS NS NS NS NS NS I MW.I S 184 27 13 87 NM NM 170.40 NS NS NS NS NS N5 NS NS 1 NS NS NS NS NS NS NS MW.15 184 27 13 48 NM NM 170.79 8/19/98 NS NS NS NS NS NE NS t NS NS NS NS NS NS NS MW.15 184 27 12 39 NM NM 171 91 5/20/98 NS NS NS NS NS NS NS NS NS N8 NS NS NS NS MW.15 184 27 1 2 1 2 NM NM 1 72 1 5 2/17198 ND ND NO ND ND NO NA NA NA NA NA NA ND 3.4 / MW-15 184 27 13 25 MA NM 171 02 NS NS NS NS NS NS NS NS NS NS 1/$ NS NS NS NS MW.15 184 27 12.33 NM NM 171 94 NS NS NS NS NS NS NS NS NS NS NS NS NS NS NS MW.I S '84 27 1 2 33 NM NM 171 94 5/21.22/97 ND ND ND ND ND ND NA NA NA NA NA NA ND 2 8 MW-IS 18427 11 27 ND 000 173.00 1/7/97 NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA 062 MW-15 184 27 13 82 ND 0.00 170 45 10/8/95 NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA 0.94 MW.15 184 27 12 46 ND 0 00 171 81 8/27/98 NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA 0.47 MW.15 184 27 10 53 ND 0 00 173 74 3/14/99 NO ND ND NO ND N0 NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA MW.15 184 27 12.1 3 140 0 00 172.14 1/3/98 ND NO 0.56 1 8 NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA MW.15 184 27 14 32 NO 0 00 169 96 9/21/96 NO 1 1 0 7 2.7 ND ND NA NA NA NA NA NA ND 2.2 MW-15 184 27 13 03 ND 0 00 171 24 8/20/96 ND ND ND ND NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA yra t • PEAVEY OIL COMPANY•FORMER TIGARD TEXACO NS Not Sampled ND -Not Dectected at or above method reporting limit NM - Not Meeeured NA - Not Analyzed MWT100 i.';'.iiiil:;;. _ : 8010/2020e350•Ip a • 7421 IMP - 1,3,8- 1,2.4- . i t Impepyl n-Propyl Trbnedryl Ttlmethyl Dea.of Wei.., ::,:Wdreed. Depth to., Depth la, Ptadae4 Corrreeted Date et Samene Telueee E hybemene Xyleriee 1,2•DloI i,then 1,2-0b6Ml1etNw Na/AWI.u. MIRE benzene benzene benirina bentene • DW9/n.d 01 • Oru866 Nembeh ::.sWWien.IFt.E'iYIIYMPI/'lit::Pleduet IRA'hldieaaip * w''EL.1Ft.Z Sinnaeq _ t®CI 16:411 i.,:. Ailed... C 5/2101 M •18 183.83 NM 10.90 NM NM NS NS N$ 115 NS r NS NB NS NS NS NS NS NS NS 1/33/01 MW-16 183.83 NM 10 90 NM NM NS NS NS NS NS NS NS NS NS NS NO NS NS NS 10/17/00 MW-16 183.83 12.76 10.90 NM 171 07 NS NS NS NS NS NS NS NS NO r NS NS NS NO NS '•7/00 MWI6 183.83 NM 10.90 NM NM NS NS NS NS NS NS NS NS NS NS NS NS NS NS 19 MW16 183.83 11.56 10.90 NM 172.27 NS NS NS NS NS NS NS NS NS NS NS NS NS NS J/99 MW 16 193.93 11 14 10.90 NM 172.69 NS NS NS NS NS NS NS NS NS NS NS NO NS NS ^ W 5/17/99 M16 183.93 9.34 10.90 NM 174.49 NS ' NS NS NS NS NS NS NS NS NS NS NS NS NO _ 2/10/99 MW-16 183.93 8.72 10.90 NM 175.11 NS NS NS NS NS NS NS NS NS NO NS NS NS NO 11/11/99 M •16 183.83 11.90 10.90 NM 171.87 NS NS NS NO NS NS NS NS NS N8 NS NS NS NS Sit9/98 M •I6 18383 11.12 10.90 NM 172.71 8/19/98 NS NO NS NS NS NS NS NS NO NS NS NS NS 5/20/99 M •16 183.83 10.15 10.90 NM 173.68 5/21/98 NS NS NS NS NS NS NS NS NS NS NS NS NS 2/17/99 M •16 183.83 9.73 10.90 NM 174.10 2/17/98 ND ND ND ND NO NO NA NA NA NA NA NA ND 11/20/97 MIN-16 193.63 11.34 10.90 NM 172.49 NS NS NS NS NS NS NS NS NO NO NS NO NS NS 0/28/97 MW-16 183 63 9.50 10.90 NM 174.33 NS NS NS NB NS NS NS NS NS NS NS NO NS NS 5/22/97 M •16 193 83 9.50 NM NM 174.33 5/21.22/97 NO NO ND NO NO IUD NA NA NA NA NA NA NO 1/7/97 M •16 103.83 8.84 NO 0.00 174.99 1/7/97 NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA 10/8/96 MW 16 163133 11.56 NO 0.00 172.27 10/8/96 NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA 6/27/95 M •16 183.93 9.83 ND 0.00 174.00 8/27.96 NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA 3/13/98 MW•16 193 83 7.97 ND 0.00 178.91 3/14.96 ND ND ND ND ND NO NA NA NA NA NA NA NA 1/3/94 MW 18 183.83 10 42 ND 0.00 173.41 1/4i98 ND ND ND NO NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA 9/20/95 M •18 183.93 12.39 NO 0.00 171.44 9/21/95 ND ND ND 1 3 ND NO NA NA NA NA NA NA ND 7/17/95 M •18 183.83 11.11 ND - 0.00 172.72 6,'21/95 NO ND ND NO NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA Astro Station I Natural Gas Line Canopy MW-1(Astro) Water SW Pact fic H'ght'v'ay Water MW-7 , or GTE FtlJeroptic-1.D.<5 A MW-3 I. MW-6 � Water Ine i is 4 s i s: MW-2 III * MW-4 P G OP JP il I.D.6'BGS O MV Nat Gan ■ ■ NaL Gas ■ MIM1�1O Nat. Gas PGE tl1 %o ' P.LI Transfonne ` m��!� err. l.D.approx. 13'BGS Parking Lot ID.approx. S 10'BG ■ O / LD.approx E EXPLANATION Monitoring Well Location and Number OMW-8 5 BP Monitoring Wcll Location and Numbs x Note: Location of unlit • Squier and Associates Boring Location utilities not shown on a : invert depth(Hi)are sl -e- Astro Monitoring Well Location MW-I (Astro) I.D. Approximate Utility Invert Depth EM BGS Below Ground Surface GEM -it"40 ) : Id ',/ / V \ A (0 )4.- 0 : k r : I■irAmwair,�V ot "'�.�-�...;..�,,,�, 1 TEXAC • s +.. ° +'9� �iy .� •.1 PA C I F1 C • • •iO '*', C' y'4 1 r i pwr 4 e: 4 i r 9P Ilk EID x • 4 9 LFO J a`o 's' "S' i9p "4' r G gy p' +'yJ S + 4,. `s 4L. NU X \ r )4- ---... 1 - N. 0 iv • N 1 I":i Th4...9‘.. Kb* . .''. g'/j . : ii. n Fl? , , • __._._._______.__ _................— ...._____ • I SEND 1 VES Location 0' 20' 40' mow mow reatment Compound 44-7 t1 • - - t • 1 aTigzi • • Q • • • ,J • • ! • - ;� • Lej 1625237 Treatment Compound/7d LEGEND :a1 .Sparge Point rging System Trench lch Cross—Section 0' 20' 40' mo■ ■i A Q ' ` A O 1 I 0 0 111=111111MMII -• 1 O �� O 1 O 0 e A 0 O 0 I -4u, 0 41 -o a -o a � a (I) on 1,,-J. 1 - w w a rn O GO -V. $'■ -V) O Ci ■ � AI ■0 S 0 Out tc L 3 0- In fro LEGEND r II Sparge Point 0' 20' 40' sum •_ - S.W.1AC IFIIC HIGHWAY •- . • • • • - 4 Q ! •; i •OFF-ICE / E `�)- . 0 r. © I V, / UUILDIN.G.-- or - E © • - i • yam. / 1•'7(-./, ./•e ....".".e.e.".."-.".e e.ez.r"./...-...-z-.e."-/..'.E-_",‘■'*6•i'. - • i.I - :..-,: -s--.7• —•,. I ' - - HUDSON PLAZA COMPLEX _ .-_ ••. • . .•.. r. ,- OFFICE BUILDING - . , OFFICE BUILDING , , ' . i. .4,. . ,,,,,,,,,,;,,,,,,,;,,,,. . • • • • _ __ r . /1-77-7-77"7-77- - I �-:::.. ION 0 . - - --____ `_ --�- LEGEND -. S/vES CONNECTIONS- - HORIZONTAL VES LINES • - TRENCH CROSS SECTION - • - - 1 SPARGE PANT - DETAIL 3 • GRAPHIC SCALE . ) S/vES POINT•- DETAIL 2 ). SINES POIN f - DETAIL 1 St] O 25 50 Km ne etilmanon POWER POLE CATCH BASIN �� R�� MONITORING WELL �y - RIGHT-OF-WAY CENTERUNE IN FEET ) OIV CURB-LINE - - - •• 77. BUILDING LINE 1 inch = 50 ft j�'. • e° 117,22..,'1 I.01.I1n( w y ®IIfl • • PIPING AREA - - £eckkoi SEE DETAIL. - • . - Line 4Separator/r e . 1.4r ' - Tank ' • Electrical Line Sump Pump r — — . . to Telephone. ! I- ti• Power.Pole Stripping Blower Fenced.Enclosure on , - Water Batch • "! : •• . . Concrete Pad Electrical- Junction Box VES Motor i : Electnca Contra` �� Toowwerr 8 ower 1 Panels • - ; Valve -. • - ' .X Electrical Pressure Gouge Pole E: ower . P Sporgei IA VES UNE t licam.S.3 VES LINE 2 SPARGE LINE t Electrical rail:- T�+ SPARGE UNE 2 • Stripping Tower Groundwc 5 HP Spurge Motor t 1 ^ Solenoid - Discharge to City Serer Motor �:+w��ten` Valve. Enclosure : • "a• Water Condenser • - Blowers Vacuum REMEDIATION ENCI Sc- .15 HP VES Motor i J .• : Electrical • - Gauge - . c.T,' -- 1Panel _ 'Float. Switch Silencers -3-.VES. PVC S -. Vent Stock. - Air Mix' • Valve. . - YES tines • • ' Condensate Seporoter/ ' - —_-- Knock-out. Tank • ' 0 . • • I 0.:• O REMEDIATION-ENCLOSURE DAVIDSON PROPERTY . Electrical Score: 1' n 5' FElectrita' - - -• 1- - Junction Box/ i Ar i .j' '- 5 ;,-• Ar Mix 1 Root witch ;. • Wave . - i ENctricol' n01•111\ LEGEN D Junction Box -• • j Boll Valve. Electrical RemedigGon - C) _ Threaded Cap into Piping valor Enclosure Panel Condenwle Seporoter/ Knock-out Tank 2, H • Copped Piping Stubbed of Surfoce - I. es ' ••_ Electrical lines Direction of Air Flow • DETAIL — PIPING AREA: -PLAN VIEV Sound Proofing Enclosure . Scale: I' = 2' aYa eL'fll comp©uia l I?®amen° ¶f w° 1 IPesv y O l 'I c c • • �" 'TRENCH SECTION C 1 • . • • ._ - 1' Minimum - - . . ' - . . •-Asphalt/Concrete y ' .-S��r Base Course =11-11 =„11 Compacted Earth ' .- - il _ 1"1 f T- Native Soil . E 11= :a=11=11-q • G :i1=11=tl=q rr • - — - Gall=11=11=11• .. T_ -lift. - - • t1='I=11 tV .i=11-11= ' 11=11=11=I N. - _ 11=11–II=q . n=11=11=1118 - . - 11=11=11=I1—L� 1 11=11 i1 :;:Vi I" Minus Round Rock .- 1: ;;•• • To Spree Point TRENCH SECTION -. C3 TRENCH SECTION 1' Minimum l,• Minimum . • rte`- Asphalt/Concrete - �_pm_- Base Course = =ii -11—II Compacted Earth th ICI "II' 11� 1 lllf�l I °n":I Ir�' Native Soil • la I;_- _ _ nn —t1 _ - ? 11111111=,... `�' •�7 -�7 E' k=11=11 E li L_ r. - I tF=N= I n=u=� n In=11 —u=n=n . _ _ , . =II--,--_ ,-.--= . o n—a=u—q- --_ � N t 11=11=fl= �(L� 11=1=11=11_, N 1Iii-1--==:::P_ '- - _ 1=11=!1-11= - - - - ,, ,11=11 f II _ 77• I} 1=11 • •••. 'll ' 1" Minus Round Rock •'I•. ilf :'::;:I .'rww.w.•arty in:::::; - :w\ /.:: • •- - To Spree Paint To Spree Point - - To Spew Point To Sparer Point. VIES - TES VES - O. •• - - , r ll e 11 c® ait�1111C6 ll • Curiceo gec llolla • SPARGE DETAIL 1 - - SPARGE•DETAIL 2 : RGI , . SPA .. .. 12"z12� Monument + i • ( } I1' . . -1.. I ' fi 1•. 11 • 3':I lii/ Grout . 3• 4; ;... 3� i•2 PVC Casing•. / ;, . Bentonite . -,. / .. - - .t`=.. :.. -• . %S :;_.; :;. - 27 Slotted Casing - :.o:i 4* 9. 8.0" - %/%• .••.—.• ••. - - �•.,—.. ••. - %: .: •: 1"—minus Round Rock '•::_:: ::., • •y:,_•• .:. :• : 04 .•.L•• .•• - - - ••• •• ••• - - ?•ff%r�'r/ ;i.; - ' ':::: •:• 1.;•:4,r/. :��r • - - - ••,=••• .••. - % !:4,r'! fI' :•:=.: .... ' /:/•%/•/. /•% _ .••._•• .••. - ./r 44%:4%. •I j - ,•S.=:. :••, - - '-. ;Ik':i ': : : �, /.,/.; fi% - -4,..;-•••••f: r. I• '/ . % 'i; I Z..•4%!: '%• !%r r rr! .;4..;:r �: 2" PVC Casing `•:;.`' %``.' '%•::f:;; :r`;. _ :: � ;a- - - '.3 'i-':t; �.' .Bentonite ../fV I 'O .- - ;4 g'f4., '�. - r,'ir.`i:' /••r • 1.0.•:.',.-.; :4 4i /v �i .;,......!;•:•', ,r %r j•4/. /r� fir/ ',.:''....;;.!...4,4 I' ,://.te /. // .,;4.-•-4.; .v.. !i • �; f/•r • � /• t f4%r;•4 ••i i.;?ri f ;/r, .' •:•:•:•—:•: 1"—minus Round Rock !fir�!r/r; Pi �4 '•:•:•:•C:•: - .4 ri: !f4 •. ,!.!.!.!,-.!• 2" Slotted Casing %;f - Wee,r %r, , :Ir :::::::E1:::: : • . ..: :_:... • '.b•.••_••• • • ORIT14,40 lb3bTilllnE . V �c� Iln - �IF®n• en' ii l ::I rd IFesty y 0511 're.. • • • - _ - - Stripping • is - • Control Panel Control Panel • • {- • - v To Well To Pressure Vi Pump • I } /Sensor To Float./ ( I ' To. Float - I . Switch - Switch • To Blower? . i Explosion Proof �w r h Blower •. �• - Transfer `�� . _ Batch Pump J �% Tank _ Transfer . Pump - IMIli 144-,•,,,,j-PI`,,i'ptm.e1ee t,0rl rl,� ','�,,%, ,%..,.% ! t��j�'.)I t'1':i;*3;tet• ri`'.•''417e� re%;'�.,'%;`el t44,t.%r/;i�f;•ei�41;e�`;t':e'I�I V%'t,;el4,%';;;;;;;.'"%e�e�f;444.S.141:44;',%":41:',44-1� _ :�oj<t,r%�'i're eit 4.n,_`��•j�„, �o,tl•,..,t" e',et„et„.;t„!die„_t„, _,.��_„,__I ej, eet1 Vei a?i ee ei eo ee ti 7 ei ei 44 e444'e ee ee e04.4;i eI ei ei e, i ei �e f„"eta e4;t Ze`�!.�%.1,:'ei `�.:;��?teti ,,,i�%1 _,?ii?ioi? .7e%,4 to to to ¢i��ito�ri,•i��?i��i�i?i'i��i tii��4it�!�i��G ii,ii��ii�t ii,flit 4 lies;?e 4; 1st/!4. ?i�!�i��!li`�` o,.4;04.:,i,�t',e#:'” 'F ,,ee- --- qua fer • .111114 ■ • - • ReeaDVe113 Y • 8■37®tlIla . II4ormmerr '1 T Pegovey fill Tam • i 1 SW PACIFIC HIGHWAY HUDSON PLAZA 5 Datum MW-3 • T S 'walk mw.-71 ;► • MW-6 • I Ii Sidewalk •r Sklewal (NM) Gmaa S Crass b (179.14) Landscape TAX LOT ;!E]70Q i Landscaping Asp/ Bed Asphalt .f Pr ,°f"1°' 12860 SW PACIFIC H Asphalt I (State Building , Take—Out MW-2 O ; (State Farm/ MW-4 Ptzza (175.37 TAX LOT 113101 E�rterminoton) / MW-4 II 2950 SW a ,e rStai► well' 0 MW-19 pp (173.BS) w k' Bp Depositary 178 UO Asphalt �^ Asphalt Asphalt• Business Offices 12900 SW PAC C HWY. a •ndxOpe MW-13 �/ MW-1 i i le I 3 (173.43) A / J(177.61) i Landscape //B/ / ! / // / Beds Offices MW-5 usin/e/ss/// /~ /// (175.01) MW 8 • to S Ht. -- -- -- -- -� • L •—� -- I (173. 5 w� Asphalt TAX I. Landscape Bed ►tan. • Piner 4 ca Building City of Tigard Vertical Datum Number 127, Elevation 189.57 NN (NM) Not Measured Sewer Manhole MW-4 Well Elevation at Well Electrical Manhole (176.14) Groundwater Elevation Contour Line Telephone/Power Pole —178.00— Feet Above Mean Sea Level Dashed Where Inferred Storm Water Catch Basin RW-1 Recovery Well Location and Groundwater Monitoring Well Converted to Identification Number Groundwater Recovery Well (Field Observation Verified) Property Line NOTES: DRAWING BUSED ON SITE MAP Groundwater Monitoring Well and PREPARED By WVto BROWN A Identification Number LANDSCAPE BED DIMENSIONS Attachment 3 In-Situ Well Air-Stripping Pilot Monitoring Data Sheet • IN SITU_RCW_WORKPLAN_HUDSON PLA.ZA_061906 JUNE 19,2006 COPYRIGHT 2006 FRONTIER ENVIRONMENTAL SOLUTIONS.INC. IN SITU WELL AIR-STRIPPING PILOT STUDY MONITORING DATA WELL HEAD AIR FLOW DISSOLVED PLATE DATE VACUUM VELOCITY OXYGEN LOCATION WATER LEVEL PID/OVM CONDUCTIVITY TEMP pH COUNT (FEET) (PPmv) (uS) (F) (INCHES W.C.) (FEET/MIN) (%) (HPC) • COMMENTS/GENERAL OBSERVATIONS/PROBLEMS Frontier Envrrvnn ntal Solutions,Inc Frontier Environmental Services, Inc. • p * R * I * D * E DISPOSAL COMPANY • P.O. Box 820 Sherwood, OR 97140 Phone: (503) 625-6177 Fax: (503) 625-6179 March 16, 2006 Marland Henderson Hudson Plaza 11795 SW Katherine St Tigard, OR 97223-3143 RE: Hudson Plaza at 12900 SW Pacific Hwy We have reviewed the site plan for the above-mentioned site plan, and with the following stipulation in regards to the enclosure, will provide garbage and recycling services to this • commercial building. Per our conversation on March 14, 2006, the enclosure will be 20 feet wide and 10 feet deep, which is not shown in writing on the plans. Per your conversation with Linda on March 15, 2006 we do require that there not be a center post for the gates and that the opening of the gates needs to be the full 20 feet. If you have any additional questions, feel free to contact me at(503) 625-6177 *124. Sincerely, "Yrdai - Kristin Leichner Pride Disposal Co. 503-625-6177 *124 kristinl @pridedisposal.corn • L....____Asu ULU u'�U UL 2 0 200frit ��, File Number nr GQ vV .3 . • CleaIiWater Seri Our CU.uaalmrut i.,c�.... Sensiti Pre-Screening Site Assessment ` Jurisdiction 71-1 Date =�. ©1 2-e) —C'/1's. - , Tax Map&Tax Lot . ,'JQ Az v o 1 700 owner ... '�.tl.�V5c?,• -.1i.Qa 1 �2i, ,jwPP ftakt _.Jl. 1- 44.4 mita..f, Site Address j 2rct) "Safi.s 4.0_,_s-, q�R' Company? `c +.-►mot z 5.'r-r ; , .arr4It _ Ett:4, p_- Address ..r.-la-4.1.1q.2 Proposed Activity _.,f1a.Dc Vii:4.....c-t rat State Zip C)Z-. -'2 ' IttfJ-i OkeziO .S_ › e ..U:. ' r.S- Q 7- q Li By submitting this form the Owner,or Owner's authorized agent or representative,acknowledges and agrees that employees of Clean Water Services have authority to enter the project site at alit reasonable times for the purpose of inspecting project site conditions and gathering infonmafion related to the project site. Maw use ony Maw t is one - _Official use only below this line Metal use ony below This owe V N NA Y N NA El - r . map a W M earn 9rl fr re Maps a ❑ n '1 1 Locally adopted studies or maps (]� Other L_J Specify Specify 4feealifklef Based on a review of the above information and the requirements of Clean Water Services Design and Construction Standards Resolution and Order No.04-9: : I1 Sensitive areas potentially exist on site or within 200'of the site. THE APPUCANT MUST IP PERFORM A SITE CERTIFICATION PRIOR TO ISSUANCE OF A SERVICE PROVIDER. If Sensitive Areas exist on the site or within 200 feet on adjacent properties,a Natural - Resources Assessment Report may also be required. alSensitive areas do not appear to exist on site or within 200'of the site. This pre-screening site assessment does NOT eliminate the need to evaluate and protect water quality sensitive areas if they are subsequently d-t~cove.ed. This document will serve as your Service Provider letter as required by Resolution and Order 04-S,Section 3.02_1. All - required permits and approvals must be obtained and completed under applicable local, state.and federal law. The proposed activity does not meet the definition of development NO SITE ASSESSMENT OR SERVICE PROVIDER LETTER IS REQUIRED. Reviewer Comments: /21 r ,4 .lee6s:riye 4.400ee_ ViAssal. /r. b ";4. -- Reviewed By: .-._.� t� rr Date: 7/27/06.r ` - Official use only Post-it"Fax Note 7671 �'�'/x Odes► Returned!o Applicant r . t ! Mail_Fax Counter i Tit J1 aaA f 1wJ€'1c ei t14l.�a-+k 13.16) .�f,�• Dale 7127/06 By 41111 Phone! q q �Pfione/�"� Q� `�B r_ . F xn3.6 1 173 Fa.# Q / Randall A. Reid 27530 SE Division Drive, Gresham, Oregon 97030 (503) 519-3193 4(1° May 28, 2006 Mr. Marland Henderson Marland Henderson Construction 12950 SW Pacific Highway Tigard, OR 97223 (503) 639-5537 Subject: Asbestos Survey Vacant Commercial Office Building 12900 SW Pacific Highway Tigard, Oregon Dear Marland, This letter report presents the findings and analytical results of an asbestos survey performed at the referenced building on May 8, 2006. The work was performed by an U.S. EPA-accredited AHERA building inspector and project designer. In summary, asbestos was detected in two sheet vinyl floors located in Lease Spaces A-1 and A-2. Asbestos was also detected in the 9x9-inch floor tile/mastic located in the attic lease space. A trace amount of asbestos was detected in the joint compound applied to wall and ceiling boards in the attic lease space. A description of the building materials sampled and the analytical results are presented on Table 1. The analytical laboratory report is included as an attachment. Table 1, Asbestos Survey Summary Findings & Analytical Results SAMPLE# MATERIAL DESCRIPTION LOCATION F/NF' CONDITION %ACM # ESTIMATED SAMPLES QUANTITY M-W1- Drywall/joint cmpnd. Lease Space A-1 NF Good Non- 5 1A,B,C,D,E /texturing and A-2 detect (ND) M-W2- Wall texturing Lease Space A-1 NF Good ND 5 2A,B,C,D,E and A-2 M-C1- Sprayed acoustic Lease Space A-1 NF Good ND 5 --- 3A,B,C,D,E ceiling and A-2 M-F1-4 Stone pattern sheet Lease Space A- F Good 70% 1 --- vinyl flooring 1/A-2 Common backing Area: hallway, stair landing, mens RR, and womens RR 1 F/N F: friable/non-friable Vacant Commercial Office Building 12900 SW Pacific Highway Table 1, Asbestos Survey Summary Findings & Analytical Results, cont. SAMPLE# MATERIAL DESCRIPTION LOCATION F/NF CONDITION %ACM # ESTIMATED SAMPLES QUANTITY M-C2-5 Plaster on lath Stairs to attic F Good ND 1 -- M-F2-6 Beige sheet vinyl Lease Space A- F Good ND 1 --- floor 1; front entryway M-F3-7 Lt. beige/yellow Lease Space A- F Good ND 1 --- sheet vinyl floor 1, insurance office front entry M-F4-8 Red-brick pattern Lease Space A- F Good 70% 1 -10 s.f. sheet vinyl floor 1; small section backing of flooring in insurance office,just west of reception area M-F5-9 Fleck beige sheet Lease Space A- F Good ND 1 --- vinyl floor 1; file room M-W3-10 Skim coat on plaster Basement F Good ND 1 --- wall M-F6-11 Black 12x12-inch Basement lease NF Good ND 1 --- floor tile/mastic space M-W4- Drywall/joint cmpnd. Basement walls NF Good ND 3 --- 12A,B,C /texturing M-W5- Texturing on walls Basement NF Good ND 3 --- 13A,B,C M-C3- Sprayed acoustic Basement NF Good ND 3 --- 14A,B,C ceiling M-W6-15A Drywall/joint cmpnd. Wall and ceiling F, if Good 1 of 2 --- boards in Attic damaged lease space M-W6-15B Drywall/joint Wall and ceiling F,if Good <1% 2 of 2 Not cmpnd. boards in Attic damage overall; estimated lease space d 2%in (Assume all joint such wallboards cmpnd in attic) layer only M-F7-16 9x9-inch floor tile Attic lease NF Good 5% in 1 -490 s.f. and mastic space tile; 2% in mastic These asbestos-containing materials (ACMs) must be abated by a licensed asbestos abatement contractor prior to the demolition of the building. The ACMs included friable and non-friable materials. Abatement of the ACMs would be considered Class II OSHA asbestos work and should be conducted within a negative air enclosure. Prior to abatement, notification must be Vacant Commercial Office Building 12900 SW Pacific Highway submitted by the abatement contractor to the Oregon Department of Environmental Quality (DEQ) at least 10 days prior to the start of abatement. The asbestos-containing flooring materials must be placed in double layered 6-mil waste bags, labeled, and disposed of at an approved landfill. The asbestos-containing joint compound on wallboards can be disposed of as construction and demolition debris (prior to demolition) by the abatement contractor at an approved landfill where notification has been made. Documentation of the disposal using the proper DEQ forms must be conducted by the abatement contractor. After the abatement contractor completes the abatement, a visual survey by a third party should be conducted to verify the ACMs have been removed. Clearance air monitoring is required by DEQ prior to the shut down of the negative air enclosure. The clearance air monitoring must be performed by a party financially independent from the abatement contractor, and the results must be submitted to DEQ on the proper ASN form within 30 days of the completion of abatement. No other notifications are anticipated with regard to DEQ regarding asbestos. A copy of this report must be kept on-site during the abatement project. A copy of this report may be shown to the City of Tigard in order to obtain demolition permits for the building. LIMITATIONS This asbestos survey is limited to the readily visible and accessible building materials within the subject site building. This survey did not include destructive sampling techniques. If building materials that were not sampled are found during future work, then further disturbance must cease and the building material(s) must be sampled and analyzed for asbestos. No warranty, express or implied, is made. By acceptance of this report, client agrees to hold harmless the inspector from any and all claims made by the client or any third party. CLOSING I appreciate the opportunity to assist you on this project. Please feel free to contact me if you have,questions. ;/ ?�f„ •/ Randall A. Reid AHERA Accredited Building Inspector& Project Designer Attachments: Asbestos, Regulatory Background & Methodology Laboratory Report and Chain-of-Custody Randall A. Reid 27530 SE Division Drive, Gresham, Oregon 97030 (503) 519-3193 ASBESTOS: REGULATORY BACKGROUND & METHODOLOGY Building materials that have been found to contain asbestos through analysis are designated as friable or non-friable. These designations determine how these materials will be managed, abated, and disposed. Friable asbestos-containing materials (ACMs) have a greater potential than non-friable ACMs of becoming a health hazard if the material is damaged or disturbed. Whether ACMs are friable or non-friable, the materials must be abated before they are disturbed for renovation or demolition. There are some exceptions for non-friable materials that can not be rendered friable through demolition processes (i.e., roofing mastic). Various regulatory agencies have jurisdiction over projects dealing with the abatement of ACMs. Building materials that contain greater than 1% asbestos are regulated by the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) and Oregon Department of Environmental Quality (DEQ). The DEQ enforces the U.S. EPA NESHAPS (National Emission Standards for Hazardous Air Pollutants) rule with respect to releases of asbestos to the environment. Oregon Occupational Safety and Health Administration (OSHA) regulates ACMs with greater than 1% asbestos. Drywall/joint compound wall systems with a trace amount of asbestos (<1%) are not considered asbestos-containing building materials by U.S. EPA or Oregon DEQ. Cutting the wallboard should be avoided. However, Oregon and Federal OSHA do not allow compositing results across building material layers, even for wallboard systems. Thus, wallboard systems with sample results that have greater than 1% asbestos in any individual layer are regulated by OSHA, and these materials may require full abatement prior to renovation or demolition. Notification of the presence of ACMs to the employees and sub-contractors is required under Hazard Communication regulation (29 CFR 1926.59) and the Occupational Exposure to Asbestos Final Rule (29 CFR 1910.1001), as long as there are ACMs in the building. The burden of the notification is on the building owner and facility operator. In addition, the persons mentioned above must be notified of the presence and location of ACMs; the health risk related to asbestos; and work activities to avoid because asbestos is located in the work place. Prior to demolition of the site building, an asbestos abatement plan (Project Specification) must be developed by a certified asbestos project designer in accordance with federal regulations. This letter report is considered a brief project design for the purposes of this project. If additional assistance is required by the client or the abatement contractor, please contact the Mr. Reid. Abatement of the ACMs must be conducted prior to disturbing these materials and be performed by a qualified licensed asbestos abatement contractor. Additionally, the abatement contractor must manage the ACMs in accordance with Oregon-OSHA, U.S. EPA, and the Oregon DEQ regulations. If un-sampled building materials are encountered during future construction activities, they must be considered to be ACMs until testing proves otherwise. Handling of un-sampled building materials must be conducted as if they were ACMs. The inspector conducted a building walk-through to document existing conditions and identify homogeneous materials and areas. Homogenous materials were transcribed onto forms for documentation and to assist in the preparation of a sampling plan. Suspect materials were grouped into homogeneous areas and then sampled accordingly. Sampling procedures were performed in general accordance with U.S. EPA protocols. The quantities of bulk samples collected generally followed the U.S. EPA protocols of three, five, or seven samples of Randall A. Reid 27530 SE Division Drive, Gresham, Oregon 97030 (503) 519-3193 homogeneous surfacing materials; three samples of thermal system insulation (TSI); and a "sufficient" number of bulk samples from miscellaneous materials. The inspector departed from the quantity protocols if, based on the judgment of the inspector: • The building materials did not usually contain asbestos (e.g., metal, fasteners, wood, concrete, furniture, electrical equipment, fiberglass, rubber, glass, terrazzo, ceramic tile, and architectural brick); • Electrical wire insulation for wire that has not been locked out/tagged out by a licensed electrician; • The building material would be damaged in order to collect the sample (e.g., fire doors, mudded joints above plaster ceilings, ceramic tile, etc.); or • The building materials were shown to contain asbestos in nearby areas. Assessment of Building Material Hazard Characteristics The inspector evaluated the friability and physical condition of the building materials suspected to contain asbestos. According to the U.S. EPA, a friable material can be reduced to dust or powder with slight pressure, such as hand pressure. A non-friable material contains asbestos fibers that have been "locked-in" by a bonding agent, coating, or other material, so that fibers are not released during appropriate use or handling. ACMs in good condition are those that have no visible damage or deterioration. ACMs in good condition do not present a health hazard if maintained in such a condition and left undisturbed. An ACM in fair condition exhibits minor damage (<10% area or <25% localized) and has the potential to release asbestos fibers if disturbed. An ACM in poor condition has significant damage (>10% area or >25% localized) and has the potential to release asbestos fibers during normal use or operations. Sample Collection & Analysis The inspector collected bulk samples of building materials suspected of containing asbestos. The building material was sprayed with a surfactant, collected using the appropriate tool, placed into a sealed freezer bag, and labeled with a sample number. A temporary patch was applied to the sampled building material. The inspector double-bagged and shipped the samples under chain-of-custody procedures to the analytical laboratory. Forensic Analytical of Hayward, California, a National Voluntary Laboratory Accreditation Program (NVLAP) laboratory, analyzed the samples by polarized light microscopy (PLM). PLM analysis identifies asbestos to a detection limit of 1%. If asbestos is present, it is then classified as to its type: amosite, chrysotile, tremolite, etc. Copies of the chain-of-custody forms and analytical reports are attached. Forensic Analytical Final Report Bulk Asbestos Analysis (EPA Method 600/R-93-116,Visual Area Estimation) Randy Ried Client ID: RP1000 Report Number: B085372 27530 SE Division Drive Date Received: 05/15/06 Date Analyzed: 05/18/06 Gresham,OR 97030 Date Printed: 05/18/06 First Reported: 05/18/06 Job ID/Site: 12990 SW Pacific Hwy. FASI Job ID: RP1000-53 Total Samples Submitted: 35 Date(s)Collected: 05/08/2006 Total Samples Analyzed: 35 Asbestos Percent in Asbestos Percent in Asbestos Percent in Sample ID Lab Number Type Layer Type Layer Type Layer WWI-I A 10522581 Layer: White Drywall ND Layer:Off-White Skimcoat/Joint Compound ND Layer: Paint ND Total Composite Values of Fibrous Components: Asbestos(ND) Cellulose(20%) Fibrous Glass(10%) M-W I-1 B 10522582 Layer: White Drywall ND Layer: Off-White Skimcoat/Joint Compound ND Layer: Paint ND Total Composite Values of Fibrous Components: Asbestos(ND) Cellulose(20%) Fibrous Glass(10%) M-W1-1C 10522583 Layer: White Drywall ND Layer: Off-White Skimcoat/Joint Compound ND Layer: Paint ND Total Composite Values of Fibrous Components: Asbestos(ND) Cellulose(20%) Fibrous Glass(10%) M-W 1-1 D 10522584 Layer: White Drywall ND Layer: Off-White Skimcoat/Joint Compound ND Layer: Paint ND Layer:Off-White Woven Material ND Total Composite Values of Fibrous Components: Asbestos(ND) Cellulose(30%) Fibrous Glass(10%) M-W1-IE 10522585 Layer: White Drywall ND Layer: Off-White Skimeoat/Joint Compound ND Layer: Drywall Tape ND Layer: Off-White Skimcoat/Joint Compound ND Layer: Paint ND Total Composite Values of Fibrous Components: Asbestos(ND) Cellulose(20%) • Report Number: B085372 Client Name: Randy.Rigid Date Printed: 05/18/06 Asbestos Percent in Asbestos Percent in Asbestos Percent in Sample ID Lab Number Type Layer Type Layer Type Layer M-W2-2A 10522586 Layer: Off-White Skimcoat/Joint Compound ND Layer: Paint ND Total Composite Values of Fibrous Components: Asbestos(ND) Cellulose(Trace) M-W2-2B 10522587 Layer: Off-White Skimcoat/Joint Compound ND Layer: Paint ND Total Composite Values of Fibrous Components: Asbestos(ND) Cellulose(Trace) M-W2-2C 10522588 Layer: Off-White Skimcoat/Joint Compound ND Layer: Paint ND Total Composite Values of Fibrous Components: Asbestos(ND) Cellulose(Trace) M-W2-2D 10522589 Layer: Of White Skimcoat/Joint Compound ND Layer: Paint ND Total Composite Values of Fibrous Components: Asbestos(ND) Cellulose(Trace) M-W2-2E 10522590 Layer: Off-White Skimcoat/Joint Compound ND Layer: Paint ND Total Composite Values of Fibrous Components: Asbestos(ND) Cellulose(Trace) M-C1-3A 10522591 Layer:Ott White Non-Fibrous Material ND Layer: Paint ND Total Composite Values of Fibrous Components: Asbestos(ND) Cellulose(Trace) M-C1-3B 10522592 Layer: Off-White Non-Fibrous Material ND Layer: Paint ND Total Composite Values of Fibrous Components: Asbestos(ND) Cellulose(Trace) M-C1-3C 10522593 Layer: Off-White Non-Fibrous Material ND Layer: Paint ND Total Composite Values of Fibrous Components: Asbestos(ND) Cellulose(Trace) Report Number: B085372 Client Name: Randy Ried Date Printed: 05/18/06 Asbestos Percent in Asbestos Percent in Asbestos Percent in Sample ID Lab Number Type Layer Type Layer Type Layer M-C1-3D 10522594 Layer: Off-White Non-Fibrous Material ND Layer: Paint ND Total Composite Values of Fibrous Components: Asbestos(ND) Cellulose(Trace) M-C1-3E 10522595 Layer: Off-White Non-Fibrous Material ND Layer: Paint ND Total Composite Values of Fibrous Components: Asbestos(ND) Cellulose(Trace) M-F1-4 10522596 Layer: Black Sheet Flooring ND Layer: Fibrous Backing Chrysotile 70% Layer: Yellow Mastic ND Total Composite Values of Fibrous Components: Asbestos(25%) Cellulose(5%) M-C2-5 10522597 Layer: Off-White Plaster ND Layer: Paint ND Total Composite Values of Fibrous Components: Asbestos(ND) Cellulose(Trace) M-F2-6 10522598 Layer: Tan Sheet Flooring ND Layer: Fibrous Backing ND Total Composite Values of Fibrous Components: Asbestos(ND) Cellulose(20%) Fibrous Glass(5%) Synthetic(10%) M-F3-7 10522599 Layer: Tan Sheet Flooring ND Layer: Fibrous Backing ND Layer: Yellow Mastic ND Total Composite Values of Fibrous Components: Asbestos(ND) Cellulose(20%) Fibrous Glass(5%) Synthetic(10%) M-F4-8 10522600 Layer: Red Sheet Flooring NJ) Layer: Fibrous Backing Chrysotile 70% Total Composite Values of Fibrous Components: Asbestos(25%) Cellulose(5%) M-F5-9 10522601 Layer: Brown Sheet Flooring ND Layer: Fibrous Backing ND Total Composite Values of Fibrous Components: Asbestos(ND) Cellulose(35%) _c i Report Number: B085372 Client Name:• Randy Ried Date Printed: 05/18/06 Asbestos Percent in Asbestos Percent in Asbestos Percent in Sample ID Lab Number Type Layer Type Layer Type Layer M-W3-10 10522602 Layer: Grey Cementitious Material ND Layer: Paint ND Total Composite Values of Fibrous Components: Asbestos(ND) Cellulose(Trace) M-F6-11 10522603 Layer: Black Tile ND Layer: Black Mastic ND Total Composite Values of Fibrous Components: Asbestos(ND) Cellulose(Trace) M-W4-12A 10522604 Layer: White Drywall ND Layer: Off-White Skimcoat/Joint Compound ND Layer: Paint ND Total Composite Values of Fibrous Components: Asbestos(ND) Cellulose(20%) Fibrous Glass(10%) M-W4-12B 10522605 Layer: White Drywall ND Layer: Off-White Skimcoat/Joint Compound ND Layer: Paint ND Total Composite Values of Fibrous Components: Asbestos(ND) Cellulose(20%) Fibrous Glass(10%) M-W4-12C 10522606 Layer: White Drywall ND Layer: Off-White Skimcoat/Joint Compound ND Layer: Paint ND Total Composite Values of Fibrous Components: Asbestos(ND) Cellulose(20%) Fibrous Glass(10%) M-W5-13A 10522607 Layer: Off-White Skimcoat/Joint Compound ND Layer: Paint ND Total Composite Values of Fibrous Components: Asbestos(ND) Cellulose(Trace) M-W5-13B 10522608 Layer: Off-White Skimcoat/Joint Compound ND Layer: Paint ND Total Composite Values of Fibrous Components: Asbestos(ND) Cellulose(Trace) M-W5-13C 10522609 Layer: Off-White Skimcoat/Joint Compound ND Layer: Paint ND Total Composite Values of Fibrous Components: Asbestos(ND) Cellulose(Trace) Report Number: B085372 Client Name: Randy Ried Date Printed: 05/18/06 . Asbestos Percent in Asbestos Percent in Asbestos Percent in Sample ID Lab Number Type Layer Type Layer Type Layer M-C3-14A 10522610 Layer: Off-White Non-Fibrous Material ND Layer: Paint ND Total Composite Values of Fibrous Components: Asbestos(ND) Cellulose(Trace) M-C3-14B 10522611 Layer: Off-White Non-Fibrous Material ND Layer: Paint ND Total Composite Values of Fibrous Components: Asbestos(ND) Cellulose(Trace) M-C3-14C 10522612 Layer: Off-White Non-Fibrous Material ND Layer: Paint ND Total Composite Values of Fibrous Components: Asbestos(ND) Cellulose(Trace) M-W6-15A 10522613 Layer: White Drywall ND Layer: Beige Skimcoat/Joint Compound ND Layer: Drywall Tape ND Layer: Beige Skimcoat/Joint Compound ND Layer: Paint. ND Total Composite Values of Fibrous Components: Asbestos(ND) Cellulose(20%) M-W6-15B 10522614 Layer: White Drywall ND Layer: Beige Skimcoat/Joint Compound Chrysotile 2 % Layer: Drywall Tape ND Layer: Beige Skimcoat/Joint Compound Chrysotile 2 % Layer: Paint ND Total Composite Values of Fibrous Components: Asbestos(Trace) Cellulose(20%) M-F7-16 10522615 Layer: Brown Tile Chrysotile 5"/n Layer: Black Mastic Chrysotile 2 % Total Composite Values of Fibrous Components: Asbestos(5%) Cellulose(Trace) Report Number: B085372 Client Name: Randy Ried Date Printed: 05/18/06 Asbestos Percent in Asbestos Percent in Asbestos Percent in Sample ID Lab Number Type Layer Type Layer Type Layer • James Flores,Laboratory Supervisor,Hayward Laboratory Note: Limit of Quantification ('LOQ')= 1%. 'Trace'denotes the presence of asbestos below the LOQ. 'ND' 'None Detected'. Analytical results and reports are generated by Forensic Analytical at the request of and for the exclusive use of the person or entity(client)named on such report.Results,reports or copies of same will not be released by Forensic Analytical to any third party without prior written request from client.This report applies only to the samples)tested.Supporting laboratory documentation is available upon request This report must not he reproduced accept in full.unless approved by Forensic Analytical.The client is solely responsible for the use and interpretation of test results and reports requested from Forensic Analytical.This report must not be used by the client to claim product endorsement by NVLAP or any other agency of the U.S Government.Forensic Analytical is not able to assess the degree of hazard resulting from materials analytxxL Forensic Analytical reserves the right to dispose of all samples after a period of thirty(30)days,according to all state and federal guidelines,unless otherwise specified. All samples were received in acceptable condition unless otherwise noted. • 11 Forensic Analytical Anal sis Re.uest forn- Meat Name&Ackirmis: O.17 Par Ha's DSIllb: 501iCe r #2525 Randy Reid -_ Turn Around none- Isf -my ; 24Iw /48 he I e* Pioneer 2753O SE Dieiskei Drive - - ----- . Due Dale: r 1 Dine Tuna: : aralper Gresham.OR 97030 • - PlJa:$Sunda's!: g Pain:Cow: ri PC81.rth00111 7400 4710-ttact:-.. Randy Reid t, TEM Agr:0 Al ERA) "rYanvi4e2 f 0 moat 7492 9 TEDIBuft CP Diuurteadva r 0 a ua*wire r 0 Ch atfiew _.. '- ',none it 5021515-3193 CI veta wow;CI Potable/0 Non-Ptr.ot4e/ 0 NI% El TWA Nlerovag .._........._..._ . . Na I: 5231492-7958 . 0 Spaefal Prot: Site: 9 MOORS P1111111113! SW/1W ' 12160 SW 1446;16e Hipnigay Jab: 1111671e: Analytes• .. -- Comm' ants: Email results to rekt.housaW-onicast.nse , • - . .... wommoor■IP Sart* 4 Sirnple ID . Cats Semple LoestIsnesettiption [ KR Ail 6ADACI.CD ONLY Prei or 4 : Tinto rwe new°mot Ads.iPM I Total Air ■- ! A -Tu \to le wn • • 1 (4_, 43-.je> 5/1144.; fa ie.s Lc" iir-eft". cast- r , r .-1--- A 1- ; ,,..,_v_ I . . .... A • P C A ' rq- 145- )3Ra 51c, i-clekt,-,- p A -' --______, C K— C5--J4AC, P c '1--- - -. 1 pt A A , A- F-7- Ur j gr "1" rer P • C . A P . A ! I .. ...,C1 Eanpled by RANCALL A. REID Dale: s t /ID / DM le-ruzr . ... fit,ped via: In Fec Ex 0 A' Toe o UP 0 us Itia I n CLAJf „43,Dttop Of, 0 Other: RolinquIshs$byt ,(2 , Ralinqukthod by: •-ir Cc.,, „.. ' Rd haw abed by Dela/Thaw 34. 1 Pl ‘e511 f, __,Z ... ' NA Opla(Tina: ''---4 14 i.:ts" ..1 5 L(1., Data I TAM: Received bw,...,... - Receives by: . Fardoivad 71f. .. 7. - 1 ' if vtawrn (--V --} 113eD/Ilene: :.•!...../liz.-:i-:..,.„:1 'r... t_;:,,,.1.4..,, lekbilit- Mel i 1111181 1 IV "I I° 1 Demul tier Acceptable?la•Yes CI No _Centiliters Ile? Yes No Centiliter%Am:001W? 7 'i110 9 No - _ Oan Yranclac,o Office:3777 Depot Roac,Ste.400,!larva Cation)*94545:Trios tu ft.(8001 827-3274;Nut(510)987-421 e Los Angeles CVnea:2959 peere Corernerea Pflug,Rend+.DOIningdaz.Coldenia 9022' adept-ono (310)763'2374 i Fag (3103769 6664 ' Portland L'Ailee. '7403 SW Upoat 6ores hetyr-was.5-te.eab.Lunar.UN 9:224/I eephiona: (910 41D-1B BE I Fix.10,T1)365-1094! Las Vegan Off= 3900 Poradise Feed etc. 191.Lan Vegas.W e9109/Telephone (702)794-3040/Fes 1,701)7194-0090 Forensic .Analytical Analysis Request Form client Name&Address! 1 PO it Pac-hey Date: 6411/04 #2525 Randy Reid — - 1 Tern/a VW ri:Tiray. hrf 12hr 1 Z4t r 45 n (ext Ronal 27S3Q SE Division Dritlto 'I Duc Dais: F r fine: ; -. anl1prn Gresham.DR 97030 pule$Jce,dard , 'Pont cglni In Pelt n1C79H 7400 IContact Randy Raid r �0 701 Air. 3 Al IERAr tI Y.1i4fe2: ❑NIC311 7432 __ ❑ /EN Bulk: ❑ Quar1itMr e 1 1 Q-Ja Sabre! ❑ Cbarbeld Phnrraai 503151f-3193 i 3 7EM'Naar:0 Parable n Non-Potrbie ❑ vet% __ n TEN Idcavwe FaYa — 5[13'491-7958 —�- _ ---- i 0 Speckle Frajeet: L.• - Sit a fl Meta s Arraryaie Method risen VA Pacific Hwrtway I: Jon:-_ Natio. IAnmys- -._- U Comments: (mad results to reid.houseecan Ast.net r Sampla 3arn pie 1D I Oiled Sa rlois Lou slti on/Description FOP MR COVAPLC:1 ONLY _ I Area i r- Nes 7toteON01f I A .LPN = Total � o At _ _ `5724 I Tine vo Rine f rria►ri A P 5 lel a L Jl r � f�yjlrc. x4.. /i i pv 4:-1 + sLaC1 P I I — -Ac�. _ P Pr1- ri -4 e peer./,+5V c • i -- z- GJ l PiF.43-ar �r J A P A In t=-)--V - r,Ai ;4k- SV .. ._ _. PC , C -- . -• ,,�{ [ ! • J-' -'P -- 1 Dei i - 5v' Pc i Sample by RANDALL A. REID imta F , f (1F Torte Shipped V13. CI Fed Ex C1 Aithunle 71 UPS ❑ US Mail ❑ Courier At Drcp Off 1 Other R-0I inauishSd by 2_, Relinquished by !y(:,a_` Rch nquiahcd by: Deis l Tens: 5/n��r Dater Time: '''IA"(G. -.--1. rx) Date r firnr. Recc.cd bin r-r: Rem �}f: Racei.b.i by. '..-4.4.,...- , �i1 - :OA t tie Date(Time' '.j i.i;i:1[. : . ', '�(.."-c'---- Wire y^► ;t •-1 r��4.) Date'Time: ( J WIC? CondltienAccoptablp? ZF,Yrs ❑ Va Canditian cceptable ❑ Yak ❑ No Cendlecn Acceptable? n Yep 1 NC riar Francesco Office:.37T'Depot Road,Ste.4Qi,i.iar.a.o.Calirvnir,.94545!Toltphune_(3 8:7.3274 1 Fix.(91d)9A'-c2I a Lcs Argeles CNice-2965 Pacific cownisna Pte.*,RpAe1►c Dormrguez.alit urn ia t"M 221 r Telephone.(31&)765 237411/ca':(110)7f 3 8E<B. • FO,tiera Office 17,41)WT Uppe•coons Ferry lwac,Ste-Z e i,uurrism.OK 9/224! istecnete: (677)417-I ma I Fax-1503)r'95.1OI16 Leff Vag..Office 3900 l`eradx Road.Ole. 191,Lac Vegas,fib 09139!rclephan 170:.)e$J-08.10:=aa (732)78e-cm ' AFFIDAVIT OF MAILING/POSTING NEIGHBORHOOD MEETING N • u Ali IMPO ANE c .:,s. s- ,1 .4s,.1 i 11 f:1.71 - f[. .'f �!'� f 1 i i . E._ ' Y� :n�F1G BQ OO I _ :q,,,O i Tip z t ,I ? ; ,A , - E. j Y 1 F OWN , ARE MAI ~ ..( ! t F DRESS R* "0` '` 1 n j. � i "'°�4 , -r{ . t ilk . art y.. . 'w..*'" TrC> t` s .e a� 1. _-1 ; 'r'.,f ...-4.k.s �, X.'.^" .,`, - .::2: i' l i. ,Mi ` y'et'i L:r t t+ 0f is- i , 4 r i-,4?:. tom` , r e k ti ;,,3-..4.-^4r ',': '4 . s Eyfr,.....j. sek`e_.,.; °x.,. 0, *,: ` 1,-'' .-L + i .' .eA-e a �e ' k r." .li-. ' . Ic;'+ -roe i. L '- ^*Ye; r z -(. tr a 6- ' +- Arivy r �'" r.+, '£'" a Sr 6 r 4- .+ ;.r : t '41-t1 4 ,r-io-'-5. ^ r+ `4%:: Ili ;'. ''7.: :! i .$'! f, $ 'f _ V-4,.--.:-3 .;', -1. _ *MAILING: - I,J (L'Lt t- Q�5( ,being duly sworn,depose and say that on the 2-t day of 20 I caused to have mailed to each of the parsons on therattached list,a notice of a g to discuss a proposed development at(or near) ? C i$'n 'SO.),. leAI-L. f T U A4PP C-,c.K- .a coPY of which notice so mailed is attached hereto and made a part of hereof. 1 further state that said notices were enclosed in envelopes plainly addressed to said persons and were deposited on the date indicated above in the United States Post Office located at MA-04 1. .O., -r-, f 0 A -0 ()Plc--a4 , with postage prepaid thereon. ` Signate (In the presence/C1--C4(fei,of a Notary Public) POSTING: I, i L`f1.( er rc.') , do affirm that I an (represent) the party initiating interest in a proposed -c DO d ,,t1 affectinngy the land ted at ( the approximate Iocation(s) IF no •address(s)and/or tax s)currently registered) I '11-1C0 S C.Pa'4c:,. (-Wile, 71 r :?a C)P_c-c cifir , and did on the me day of f _Pfc:-t°1 .20.0 personally post notice g that the site may be proposed for a S b(Z- application,and the tine,date and place of a neighborhood meeting to discuss the proposal. The sign was posted at 2 ` Cizi S (_c,) .(.,6c- «_ t� .W _ C. • L j (state location you posted notice on property) ' • atulr (In the presence of a Notary Public) (THIS SECTION FOR A STATE OF OREGON, NOTARY PUBLIC TO COMPLETE/NOTARIZE) STATE OF O ergot ) County of ,Jo-- KNr t\ ) ss. M Subscribed and sworn/affirmed before me on the 2' M day of � -k , 20 O . f ,, OFFICIAL SEAL = ;r KRISTIE J PEERMAN 1- NOTARY PUBLIC-OREGON COMMISSION NO.370962 dt-‘4%-,40:) ' ' _ fAsL,t," 1.0 0 I MY COMMISSION EXPIRES JULY 28,2007 TARY PUB C OF OREGON My Commission Expires: M 24 2.0.) 7 Applicant,please complete the information below: ......-..r•..r,'..rrcr�.r,r,r,r,r,�nrr�r,r*.r, rsr,•Art Er. NOri=11.1.1111111111111111111.111m11/ ismimil immisatimmiim TICE OF NEIGHBORHOOD MEETING Monday March 27`h 2006 4 RE: Property improvements to 12900 SW Pac.Highway Dear Interested Party: Marilyn and Marland Henderson are the owners of the property at 12900 SW Pacific Highway,25/02 BD, 1900. We are considering proposing a site development review for the demolition of the existing office building and replacing it with an external ADA accessible bathroom and a new environmental compound. Included will be the construction of a coffee shack, 18' x 18' and relocating the existing flag pole with a new 35"flag pole. Eight new parking spaces and an upgraded refuse/recycle center will also be constructed. Prior to applying to the City of Tigard for the necessary land use approvals, I would like to discuss the proposal in more details with the surrounding property owners and AP residents. You are invited to attend a meeting on: Wednesday,April 12t,2006 Hudson Plaza 12950 SW Pacific Highway, Suite 125,Tigard, Oregon 7 PM Please notice this will be an informal meeting on preliminary plans. These plans may be altered prior to the submittal of the application to the city. I look forward to more specifically discussing the proposal with you. Please call me at 503-639-5537 or 503-590-2399 if you have any questions. Sincerely, Maril r- arland Henderson 0 iiii Own (coo tlso roil rorao few o srini.s;4.1"»o.+ tlsnt ±..•.l•r;.1......*;f;',".tt• • »«--.-.•.E-•1 _ _ -- , C11Y of 4 A II* OEOONC si, p AREA N : iWk *��F (5 44, 1:- *.ST. 04 FOR: Marlan::\.,usenant RE: 2S1Q2�6 =__nom►o� n+on►nn► Property oIs valid for aaoa►oe \G the date print/ O.* ,4 , „ 1,41: 46:1""Mal Ail4 4÷* in 1 w 1 kek i n1D1041A00 ' 4 imam _414 lori.11, - ,,,404•10* li■ -7, 0 411 . 010/Pr Oeiglipal rk ST #1Ipik 4010 zo--\ City' . . Information an Wi rla Q+ >I Alr ...... .04......„should ba verified��11,J:,'. a. 1i .° . T�rp ` • htt e1aPr►,ent Plot date.Mar 24,200L },, Q0 25102BD-02101 CKENZIE LLC COMET CORPORATION 2 NW THURMAN ST BY WSCO PETROLEUM#225 •ORTLAND,OR 97210 2929 NW 29Th PORTLAND,OR 97210 2S10280-00600 10200-02000 ADRANGI FARID C• ET CO•"ORATION 4289 ORCHARD WAY BY • ' • •• UM 1225 LAKE OSWEGO,OR 97035 •••TLAND,OR 97210 2610280-02700 2810260-01400 AFTER FIVE LLC CONOCOPHILLIPS CO-RETAIL 10330 SW TUALATIN RD PO BOX 1539 TUALATIN,OR 97062 PASO ROBLES,CA 93447 2 0260-02800 '-.10280-01 1,, A R Fl C •• • • - ILUPS CO-RETAIL 10330 TUALATIN RD PO :• x,! LATIN. R 97062 • 0 ROBL ,CA 93447 2S102BD-00702 02BD-01200 ARNOLD HOWARD TRUST CO ILLIPS CO-RETAIL PO BOX 23926 PO TIGARD,OR 97218 SO ROB ,CA 93447 2S1026D-00701 261020B-03301 BENNETH CATHERINE MCNICOL DARROW DON S 3830 ROBIN CREEK LN 9952 SW FREWING ST WEST LINN,OR 97068 TIGARD,OR 97223 2S1026D-01001 2S10280-01700 BLINE RONALD G& DAVIDSON WILLIAM G&DIXIE L SAGUN JUDITH L 12329 NW WELSH DR 2190 SKYLINE DR PORTLAND,OR 97229 SEASIDE,OR 97138 2S102BD-02200 5.10200-01701 BUSCHA HELMUT AND ERIKA •. 4 DS•• ' WAM G&DIXIE L 6215SW41STAVE 1 •• WELSH DR PORTLAND,OR 97221 ••• • = OR 97229 2S10280-02400 26102BD-01601 CAMPBELL SANDRA RAE DAVIDSON WILLIAM G&DIXIE L 12820 SW GRANT AVE 8915 SW COMMERCIAL ST TIGARD,OR 97223 TIGARD,OR 97223 ?S102130-02201 26102B0-02300 CHALET VILLAGE LLC FINGER FAMILY LIVING TRUST TWO CENTERPOINTE DR STE 210 BY FINGER ROGER A&PHYLLIS SAIKI LAKE OSWEGO,OR 97035 610 NW SPRING AVE PORTLAND,OR 97229 -00212 2510280-03100 ING JOSEPH L RESIDENCE TRUS MIDAS PROPERTIES INC ERRING ANN M RESIDENCE TRUST REAL ESTATE ACCOUNTING DEPT 13275 SW ASH DR 1300 ARLINGTON HEIGHTS RD TIGARD,OR 97223 ITASCA,IL 60143 25102BD-01503 28102CB-03302 GOSPODINOVIC ROSE MORRISON LACY A 12770 SW PACIFIC HWY 9950 SW FREWING CT TIGARD,OR 97223 TIGARD,OR 97223 2S102BD-01100 2S102CA-00210 HARDY GERALD T PACKER PAUL 120 RAINBOW DR PMB 2017 13235 SW ASH DR LIVINGSTON,TX 77399 TIGARD,OR 97223 2510280-01900 2S1028D-00904 HENDERSON MARILYN D HUDSON TR PELLETIER PHILIP 11795 SW KATHERINE ST 8835 SW BELL FLOWER TIGARD,OR 97224 TIGARD,OR 97224 2 102C6-03101 2S102CA-00211 HE ERS RILYN D HUDSON TR PESSIA PERRY J&PHYLLIS L 1179 KATHERINE ST 13225 SW ASH DR T ARD,0 7224 TIGARD,OR 97223 S 2S1020D-02600 2S102CA-01000 KIM PENNEY ROYAL OAKS DEVELOPMENT CO 395 NW SILVERADO DR 10125 SW MURDOCK ST BEAVERTON,OR 97006 TIGARD,OR 97224 2S10200-02100 2S102AC-01704 LIM KYUNG S S&W ARCHE ENTERPRISES LLC 2006 SE 11Th 5168 NW TOWNSEND CT PORTLAND,OR 97214 PORTLAND,OR 97229 2S102C8-03200 2S102C8-03400 MASSIH LLC SAXONY-PACIFIC LLC PO BOX 108 BOX 23562 BEAVERTON,OR 97075 PORTLAND,OR 97281 2S102BD-01501 28102CA-01300 MEXPRO LLC& SUSNJARA MARKO A BUSH STREET APARTMENTS LLC 16225 NE EUGENE CT BY ERASMO PEREZ PORTLAND,OR 97230 PO BOX 677 CLACKAMAS,OR 97015 t2510260-01502 2S102CA-00190 MEXPRO LLC& TIGARD COMMUNITY METHODIST BUSH STREET APARTMENTS LLC CHURCH BY ERASMO PEREZ 9845 SW WALNUT TIGARD.OR 97223 .,/two METHODIST •COM, NITY METHO U H 9845 "f ,ALNUT T ARD,OR 97223 2S102CB-00200 TIGARD-TUALATIN SCHOOL DISTRICT 23J 6960 SW SANDBURG ST. TIGARD, OR 97223 •2 102CB-00100 TI •RD-TU• -• IN SCHOOL DIS - 3J 696' •NDBURG ST T ARD,OR 97223 2S102CB-03000 TRAIN ARTHUR& CLINE MARY E 12990 SW PACIFIC HWY TIGARD,OR 97223 2S1028D-02900 TRUCK TERMINALS 15965 NW TULLAMORRIE WAY 41 PORTLAND,OR 97229 2 102BD-03000 TR. K ' INALS INC 15•• '4 TULLAMAORRIE WAY -•RTLAN•, •R 97229 2S102CB-02700 WALTER ANGELA D 2863 RIVERWALK LP EUGENE,OR 97401 02CB-02600 WAL GELA D 286 LP GENE•OR 97401 02CB-03300 WAL GELA D 286 ALK LP GENE,OR 97401 omas Gretchen Buehner roam Bonanza 13249 SW 136th Place Tigard, OR 97224 Tigard, OR 97224 Kristen Miller 8940 SW Edgewood Street Tigard, OR 97223 Ali Paul Owen 10335 SW Highland Drive Tigard, OR 97224 Tim Esau PO Box 230695 Tigard, OR 97281 CPO 4B 16200 SW Pacific Highway, Suite H242 Tigard, OR 97224 Ross Sundberg 16382 SW 104th Avenue Tigard, OR 97224 Brian Wegener 9830 SW Kimberly Drive Tigard, OR 97224 Joseph Dyar 10285 SW Highland Drive Tigard, OR 97224-4668 Rex Caffall 13205 SW Village Glenn Tigard, OR 97223 - John Frewing 7110 SW Lola Lane Tigard, OR 97223 Prir . . t tkcCr.Ac, 1-Th t' 14,tntz e 71 avk\GIs ,OD'/,At. "Ci,i A C21)?-1Z ® 1,05'1). u?g tkil IxtRoA4 )l 4-ca's0 I Mkt ;�A v, D e, Owea c VvY'sf r:-Y 63( Z. �YY • Ci449, i- '--S2,t....._ -------.L.,•-•._k( ,0*-s- (2-eN4c_s-r ,, a__D -erC)ock_A--- dc,---crsti. `N It(4n 6'1,45.-- --C-e• '4-L1A/- (6 14-Ca t-i.. t-cs,,,Lo..3 0.s- t eca:z,1_0 {4,-4.A, u_9-R,- 5Ck.o24 , Aci. oa is,Lk_ y'..30 a*s-cfutko, ', N.>. 0 . t),L;--c(A.-A-L4 cL4.4_07.e___ . Nc.g...04,12,z(,. , . , . ;-• . <' WI .--r. '- 111 - .. . I . ' / if- a / we' / • n ..,- . % s Ilik / \' . irk //...f. f \ I - / .'. . • is . lly 14 A . ■ (1"; ,AN , / - ..— ' , 1 \ • , • / \ \ \ 9 4:-t- t.,1 .....:: . • m IJI & ..* :• 11 -s in 0 ....i'll ' '.,-7, ,,4-';':-....- '''''-'4P•t''*1 Pr. t i chshd . \,. 1 1 , 1 , r- - 1 ' ' ,Ji ' - - ,-.. -,' •.,, .i.:'''''''',S*3!. ''.'...,4,Z,.'14f,',10,4t=, , i■' . *1 ) , . . G, 1 . .. . . ,..,- . -.<.-4,,. .."0 . -- . ,, 1,..t--VY,f-H44,-"'• fes.,*lc •-''''';;;,..1,Vilt.,4+.,...-4.4,0, , , i:.1 , ('N.,j , „,Ifx-,.-';,-14.:.;:!----:,,,,,4?til.W.:•.. ( ' i i i .. i , Oil 1 f i LC") .— i , i 4 I II , .itit, ":'...-:, '- •-••■■ ti # • ,,,e 0 , Si) . t. . , ,... .-r ....._ _,.. .. ,.. . ,,:. ,,. . ,. h L t. !L. t , ,r,. .. ii4 I . 't i , t , -f•Ll,' . 4 . ....... , _ • - I . A / / t ' ., gr41 .1,,X, Z;1,-4`';''' '''''1 , 4. ' :,tf:-'s--..'' ''-;:-.ri'l ..;•P,', ' . - . --Ati-:....;) .'i L- • , , '•• i4.0 , ,4,-;:' ,' .,1 1 / -.-., . • ,• / ,..• • .., . * ,,',,.•:, . ,.. ' ■ #. ' T , .. - - . ' '• • I 7,,::: .- , . II • 4 it ,-"S• . , ::._' . 11. , ..,,, .i * ti r7# , 1 ,,.. . _ ,.. is. . is • - I. .,. '....','.:.:-:: ADDITIONAL DOCUMENTS 8/29/2006 Conditions Associated With 9:26:35AM CCEL/7 Case #: MMD2006-00010 Condition Status Updated Code Title Hold Status Changed By Tag gate By 0001 SUBMIT REVISED SITE PLAN None Met 8;29/2006 CAC 8/29/2006 CAC 1. Submit a revised site plan showing the size,species and location of street trees to replace those removed for this project. The plan must be reviewed and approved by the City Forester prior to issuance of site and/or building permits. Page 1 of I CaseConditions..rpt 1\41ViDo?oou -- oo(3 ? 0 4 ill 0 50 100 SCALE: 1"=50' k r'a x.z+t..k, 44t-aILL ___51)co es.) r seat e9 qiuCJ e r l S alc►.ds - Mccs f- -1-e Pia44t.d no ►I at -f-avn. 30 4L51-- I •a.-+ b a..)_, d .o.►- � / I SW PA IFIC HI .WAY , l'L�" MATCH MATCH EXIST . /�C �J�/(41".ti GRADE GRADE 144 '�� ® y. ;tom. f 5 : o I M ':A j MATCH EXIST-_____L_ O , .. 0 '-ri\.\�\\.\\,'., GRADE V CS 0t4'R' NEW PAINTED ' �� ~s0 104 R' ,.74. PARKING STRIPES NEW �, yC-sd" - :'-�, , 0 -1 -_ 2TtuL1'PAD C C C C �' ti 0.4, , " i 2_,.� I 4 s� k:pRiP D .,,,, S '.t-- DRAINS _-MATCH EXIST. I', THRU URB �/ GRADE �c j ; C C C F C SEEN OT (/)1111 0 k N UGHT*°:' '''..."*...i----1 z ` I T/L 3000 TIL I9 1.1 £ p 7 GAR E&RECYC■ AREA NEW ..111111. D J L.-1 EXTRUDED CURB r # Z 4 C El_ V y� G k r i a x frl o H N Y x a� s: �s 'q\ . W TL 1900 and 3000 = 53,441 sq. ft. = TOTAL LANDSCAPE AREA = 11 ,384 sq. ft. Q LANDSCAPE AREA = 21% �, ILO) SUc,cf^wdc� J 't' S . ..l..h z HUDSON PLAZA 3 0 � �� Q 12900 SW PACIFIC HIGHWAY EL EL Z 0 SITE PLAN PO-