Loading...
MMD2007-00025 MMD2007 00025 BAJA FRESH MEXICAN GRILL A- City of Tigard, Oregon 13125 SW Hall Blvd. • Tigarc., JR 97223 10 II I.September 11, 2007 T I GARD Ed Casey/Jessy Prieto NW Fresh III LLC dba Baja Fresh Mexican Grill 16004 SW Tualatin Sherwood Road Sherwood, OR 97140 RE: Baja Fresh Minor Modification MMD2007-00025 Dear Sir or Madam: This letter is in response to your request for approval for a Minor Modification (M D2007-00025) at 11685 SW Pacific Highway, WCTM 1S136CD, Tax 102. You have requested to modify the site by constructing a patio in front of the building. The existing use,an eating and drinking establishment,is permitted in the GG zone and the proposed patio complies with development standards. No changes to the building are proposed. The submitted plans reflect the current and proposed conditions. Analysis of Modification Request: Section 18.360.060 of the Tigard Development Code Site Development Review chapter states: "Any modification which is not within the description of a major modification as provided in section 18.360.050 shall be considered a minor modification." Section 18.360.050 states that the Director shall determine that a major modification(s) has resulted if one (1) or more of the changes listed below have been proposed: 1. An increase in dwelling unit density or lot coverage for residential development. The proposal does not involve residential development. 2. A change in the ratio or number of different types of dwelling units. The proposal does not involve residential development. 3. A change that requires additional on-site parking in accordance with Chapter 18.765. The applicant is not proposing an increase in floor area. Therefore, the change will not require additional on-site parking. 4. A change in the type of commercial or industrial structures as defined by the Uniform Building Code. The applicant has not proposed any structural changes to the building. 5. An increase in the height of the building(s) by more than 20 percent. The applicant has not proposed any changes to the building, including the height. 6. A change in the type and location of accessways and parking areas where off-site traffic would be affected. The existing access on SW 78th Avenue will remain the same, as shown on the site plan. 7. An increase in vehicular traffic to and from the site and the increase can be expected to exceed 100 vehicles per day. There is no anticipated increase in traffic because the applicant does not propose to increase the floor area of the building. Page 1 of 2 Phone: 503.639.4171 • Fax: 503.684.7297 • www.tigard-or.gov • TTY Relay: 503.684.2772 a •. 8. An increase in the floor areas proposed for a non-residential use by more than ten percent excluding expansions under 5,000 square feet. There will be no increase in the size of the building. 9. A reduction in the area reserved for common open space and/or usable open space that reduces the open space area below the minimum required by the code or reduces the open space areas by more than ten percent. The proposed patio will be constructed over what is now a gravel area between the restaurant and landscaping. Landscaping will not be reduced and the patio will make a once dead space usable. Therefore, usable open space will not increase or decrease in area, but will be improved. 10. A reduction of project amenities (recreational facilities, screening; and/or, landscaping provisions) below the minimum established by the code or by more than ten percent where specified in the site plan. There are no recreational facilities onsite. As discussed previously, landscaping and screening will not be reduced as a result of the proposed project. 11. A modification to the conditions imposed at the time of Site Development Review approval that is not the subject of criteria (B). 1 through 10 above this subsection. There have not been any previous conditions of approval for the use of this site. Therefore,this criterion does not apply. THIS REQUEST HAS BEEN APPROVED BY THE CURRENT PLANNING DIVISION. PLEASE SUBMIT A COPY OF THIS LETTER WITH YOUR BUILDING PERMIT APPLICATION. This request is determined to be a minor modification to an approved site development plan. The Director's designee has determined that the proposed minor modification of this existing plan will continue to promote the general welfare of the City and will not be significantly detrimental, nor injurious to surrounding properties provided that, development which occurs after this decision complies with all applicable local, state, and federal laws. If you need additional information or have any questions, please call the Current Planning Division at (503) 639-4171 or stop by the Planning counter at CityHall, 13125 SW Hall Blvd,Tigard,OR 97223. Sincerely, Emily En -- Assistant lanner Page 2 of 2 Y 11 r� o o ���a�71 -J CITY Of TIGARD jpp O O („I ST — O O --' O� GEOGRAPHIC INFORMATION SYSTEM _ 'a` 146 o o _ VICINITY MAP W THORN P o o j� 11111W11111 _ o o 0 n STEV a MMD2007-00025 do . . ______aln III '�W--Q BA A FRESH iii All MXICAN =�> im GRILL 00 41 la 1- ow ` '- N. / LEGEND: lira ow :LE • 77/1//j SUBJECT um ST SITE 7/ r V �I/.. TAV}URS r-_- AG RO J V_ FgtyS:Y 8 ?. '< ^ w C C'Cj AMT RO. QtT 'pt:M1dliA sbr, .4111111111‘ 0 gF BIND RD. ' 1 OURHMi no Tigard Area Map N lf _c--------99 N 0 100 200 300 40VL 0 500 Feet 1 385 feet 1 a. IL A gc. Information on this map is for general location only and should be verified with the Development Services Division. OW dilL rL_(-Th I 13125 Tigard,OR 97223 (503)639-4171 \\ _ http://www.ci.tigard.or.us Community Development Plot date:Sep 11,2007;C:\magic\MAGIC03.APR ,._._ . . S W LI-rArt... T _ . Ti -, F , A..............„.\fl, ii 0.ip ,so•niti i ---) peext4 si=J7— I 1 1 I _ . . fl —T . _co or Approv.r.,: CITY O TIGARD c:cr,ditionaily Approved.— Fo r only the work as described in: PERMIT NO. See Letter to: Follow. • Attach -- —I5C-i [ -I ) [ i ..• . ,!:),..I Address:_____ _ -• • .j. ... .... L.)y:_c51,6;---..--.----7—01,+.i-•.5.-7((f1/.2.Cr-M7 ', • . .- • ...:.' / 4.1144$0 ';:.' . .'..""/ ::...' 47, /// // . . • 'N Itit, 1,1111r...1;11 f 44 • ES,t6 r7di 'S IOC w/AUC • ' alfh . .. Willi , . . \ • .• ., / .. 14 Da PAM • \ ' \ 4b.• .1;•;......, "/ . /'... . A-- ,- 1 • . k ct... '''' . 4 \s 6\ tp \.. Ift .....:.t... . . • • I-A.IestaA45Z .,: , 2, '. • ., . u\ -11h*. ... 6(.... • \r-• . (9 0 r__1,-,t__2t±_,L_____t_e....::,.,_LE.:j:.:_zzi.:.;,.L_____ iNA.J.6.- Fi3.S•5 H 141 'r--nbA•tz 0 oF2- „....v IN.201 APPSOVII0 In: INVANIOfiri DAM •at7 C.: 7 Itauwas worm AFFIDAVIT OF MAILING ppl I, Patricia L. Lunsford being first duly sworn/affirm, on oath depose and say that I am a Planning Administrative Assistant for the City of 1Figaffl, Washington County, Oregon and that I served the following: }Owk App.,, Bo,40 Bdow} © NOTICE OF DECISION FOR MMD2007-00025/BAJA FRESH MEXICAN GRILL (File No./Name Reference) D AMENDED NOTICE ® City of Tigard Planning Director A copy of the said notice being hereto attached,marked Exhibit"A",and by reference made a part hereof,was mailed to each named person(s) at the address(s) shown on the attached list(s),marked Exhibit"B",and by reference made a part hereof,on September 11,2007,and deposited in the United States Mail on September 11,2007,postage prepaid. 1 . Pre .24yfl STATE OF OREGON County of Washington ss. City of Tigard Subscribed and sworn/affirmed before me on the o2� day of tgC�66-4— ,2007. i--- OFFICIAL SEAL SHIRLEY L TREAT ,�. - , y " NOTARY PUBLIC-OREGON �J�I.C�C.7 ~�T' COMMISSION NO.418777 MY COMMISSION EXPIRES APRIL 25,2011 NOTARY P LIC OF OREGON My Commission Expires: 44a-S1/l • EXHIBIT A City of Tigard, Oregon • 13125 SW Hall Blvd. • Tigara, .)R 97223 September 11,2007 TIGARD Ed Casey/Jessy Prieto NW Fresh III LLC dba Baja Fresh Mexican Grill 16004 SW Tualatin Sherwood Road Sherwood,OR 97140 RE: Baja Fresh Minor Modification MMD2007-00025 Dear Sir or Madam: This letter is in response to your request for approval for a Minor Modification (MIvID2007-00025) at 11685 SW Pacific I-iighway, WCTM 1S 136®, Tax 102. You have requested to modify the site by constructing a patio in front of the bui.ding. The existing use,an eating and drinking establishment,is permitted in the GG zone and the proposed patio complies with development standards. No changes to the building are proposed. The submitted plans reflect the current and proposed conditions. Analysis of Modification Request: Section 18.360.060 of the Tigard Development Code Site Development Review chapter states: "Any modification which is not within the description of a major modification as provided in section 18.360.050 shall be considered a minor modification." Section 18.360.050 states that the Director shall determine that a major modification(s) has resulted if one (1) or more of the changes listed below have been proposed: 1. An increase in dwelling unit density or lot coverage for residential development. The proposal does not involve residential development. 2. A change in the ratio or number of different types of dwelling units. The proposal does not involve residential development. 3. A change that requires additional on-site parking in accordance with Chapter 18.765. The applicant is not proposing an increase in floor area. Therefore, the change will not require additional on-site parking. 4. A change in the type of commercial or industrial structures as defined by the Uniform Building Code. The applicant has not proposed any structural changes to the building. 5. An increase in the height of the building(s) by more than 20 percent. The applicant has not proposed any changes to the building, including the height. 6. A change in the type and location of accessways and parking areas where off-site traffic would be affected. The existing access on SW 78th Avenue will remain the same, as shown on the site plan. 7. An increase in vehicular traffic to and from the site and the increase can be expected to exceed 100 vehicles per day. There is no anticipated increase in traffic because the applicant does not propose to increase the floor area of the building. Page 1 of 2 Phone: 503.639.4171 • Fax: 503.684.7297 • www.tigard-or.gov • TTY Relay: 503.684.2772 8. An increase in the floor areas proposed for a non-residential use by more than ten percent excluding expansions under 5,000 square feet. There will be no increase in the size of the building. 9. A reduction in the area reserved for common open space and/or usable open space that reduces the open space area below the minimum required by the code or reduces the open space areas by more than ten percent. The proposed patio will be constructed over what is now a gravel area between the restaurant and landscaping. Landscaping will not be reduced and the patio will make a once dead space usable. Therefore, usable open space will not increase or decrease in area, but will be improved. 10. A reduction of project amenities (recreational facilities, screening; and/or, landscaping provisions) below the minimum established by the code or by more than ten percent where specified in the site plan. There are no recreational facilities onsite. As discussed previously, landscaping and screening will not be reduced as a result of the proposed project. 11. A modification to the conditions imposed at the time of Site Development Review approval that is not the subject of criteria (B). 1 through 10 above this subsection. There have not been any previous conditions of approval for the use of this site. Therefore,this criterion does not apply. THIS REQUEST HAS BEEN APPROVED BY THE CURRENT PLANNING DIVISION. PLEASE SUBMIT A COPY OF THIS LETTER WITH YOUR BUILDING PERMIT APPLICATION. This request is determined to be a minor modification to an approved site development plan. The Director's designee has determined that the proposed minor modification of this existing plan will continue to promote the general welfare of the City and will not be significantly detrimental, nor injurious to surrounding properties provided that, development which occurs after this decision complies with all applicable local, state, and federal laws. If you need additional information or have any questions, please call the Current Planning Division at (503) 639-4171 or stop by the Planning counter at City Hall, 13125 SW Hall Blvd,Tigard,OR 97223. Sincerely, / e„...--- -- Emily En �-- Assistant lanner Page 2 of 2 _ _ i �� I _1 r—i o N o > ,_'--L-- CITY of TIGARD i w ST = r GEOGRAPHIC INFORMATION SYSTEM il VICINITY MAP w THORN I ' > I 211111111R- 1111 8 g • I 1 STEVE • - MMD2007-00025 ti1u1 ! ATA FRESH E1 GRILL II 11.1 i I CO �V_ illi - 111t•-•- LEGEND: -LE -• ,• m I SUBJECT j ST j SITE riv / 1111 o : l j •Illi iik ef 5 twi 4,,., ? fE^ 1111 50, 5 w to RD ,,v,' J.1111111.11‘ 0 J I S BEEF fizN�R�, OUvI.. RD �� 4 ! — Tigard Area Map w/. N > / --c----------- 0 100 200 300 400 500 Feet 1'=385 feel e Information on this map is for general location only and in should be verified with the Development Services Division. ___t —_-. 13125 SW Hall Blvd - i Tigard,OR 97223 (503)839-4171 http:/lwww.ci.tigard.or.us Community Development Plot date: Sep 11,2007;C:\magic\MAGIC03.APR . . . . . . . . .. . . sw .1-rArri. FL. lia):1, , . ., . . . ..%1 . . .TI .. • ____ I k...2—.., TriTT • 1j. CITY OF TIGARD A- MApproved • ; :I (a4.9.-04.5 pbei LA Conditionally Approved. [ ; -a\\ --: ----tp • 11 q For only the work as described in: - ) sPeEeRMLeITtteNrOto.:Follow --[ rA Attach............--................ ......E I / .- , . • Address:______ ,— . — y...0,17-..-...---------.....— • .. . .. • , - :4& .....• . I' / • \ Ey es n..ty .5 oc.c.r.uc •• O sebkirgt u 11.,P1 Ncsr tortel .. ...: /.,• or,/ pro .. • \ . " p , s r0)....N. :.,,. ,t1; .' .**.:, • ' ,co 5/ -C . ,t \ ..:1• ti 0<° \'''. .?.. 2IZ\\7. U • U\ --11 ... NORTH O 41- . L.-74"\INI c--,c,e+L ' l'' = 20I-c." t4t6u,e..- IP?ta 4-+ I I toe,* 1,4 rAA -11::ii..,1-it,yr--1-160,R17 oF4- 1H.20 i,11 wnovto or: v.,.or V HOINIF-I ..c:,' awn«)mum= EXHIBIT' , Ed Casey/Jessy Prieto NW Fresh III LLC dba Baja Fresh Mexican Grill MMD2007-00025 16004 SW Tualatin Sherwood Road BAJA FRESH MEXICAN GRILL Sherwood, OR 97140 Stanley R McGrath Et Al By William Floberg 834 SW St. Clair Portland, OR 97205 APPLICANT MATERIALS 11iNOR MODIFICATION TYPE I APPLICATION City of Tigirzl Perna Center 13125 SW Hall Blul, Tigrra OR 97223 Phone. 503.639.4171 Fax: 503.598.1960 GENERAL INFORMATION Property Address/Location(s): l/6 �� S� PA(4�u� 1101 `�1 C.A 1 Gal./ y X7-3 FOR STAFF USE ONLY Tax Map&TaxLot#(s): MAf' I SI 36t-b 00 IO;ti Site Size: (0 9 fl C S t N c la t>k$ 1 zel N t xc,t>CioIL) Case No.(s): /4/14 �(�D7'0� Other Case No.(s): Applicant`: N W Fi 6spi 171.7 PLC d 6t, ac.;o F�¢��•f i chi.Grill Receipt No.: 3'1 d-- Address: a Jt,00 co Tvrlurr�..s'agrz�aa,�n 2� City/State: g-I �2w�o p d� Zip: 9� y V Application Accepted By: l Primary Contact: �D CA Sal /rri ea.e.T'o Date: 71}7�07 Phone: SO 6,;5 ;f: /03 7i9 o7ig Fax: _• Property Owner/Deed Holder(s)'': (Attach list if more than one) Date Determined Complete: g/)1'0� W•LLa/�H S A u. �"lro w gt lt. G Rev. ln\m l is\cumin\trutets\land use applications\minor modification app.doc Address: g 3''t S rJ S'T (,,tea i R. Phone: So3 a� 6�o 0 City/State: Pe •( • Zip: qua as When the owner and the applicant are different people, the applicant must be the REQUIRED SUBMITTAL ELEMENTS purchaser of record or a lessee in possession with written authorization from the owner (Note: applications will not be accepted or an agent of the owner. The owner(s) must sign this application in the space provided without the required submittal elements) on the back of this form or submit a written authorization with this application. PROPOSAL SUMMARY ( Application Form The owners of record of the subject property request permission for a Minor Owner's Signature/Written Authorization Modification. To review a modification as a Minor Modification,the Director must first find that the expansion does not invoke one or more of the 11 criteria discussed a Title Transfer Instrument or Deed within Section 18.360.050(B) of the Tigard Development Code. If the modification exceeds the maximum allowed under any one or more of the following criteria,a , J Site Development Plan(3 copies) Major Modification review is required. Major Modifications are processed in the same manner as a new Site Development Review. In a separate letter, please Site/Plot Plan(reduced 8%1"x 11) address the criteria below contained in Section 18.360.050(B) including a detailed Applicant's Statement(3 copies) response to each criteria. (Addressing Criteria Under Section 18.360.050(B) 1. An Increase in dwelling unit density or lot coverage for residential development. Filing Fee $574.00 2. A change in the ratio or number of different types of dwelling units. 'C 3. A change that requires additional on-site parking in accordance with Chapter 18.765. 4. A change in the type of commercial or industrial structures as defined by the In addition,the Director must find that the proposed Uniform Building Code. change complies with the underlying standards of the 5. An increase in the height of the building(s) by more than 20%. applicable zoning district. To complete this review, 6. A change in the type and location of accessways and parking areas where off-site the Applicant's proposal must include a discussion traffic would be affected. indicating how the site expansion will continue to 7. An increase in vehicular traffic to and from the site and increase can be expected comply with the minimum setback, building height, to exceed 100 vehicles per day. parking land landscaping standards. Other 8. An increase in the floor area proposed for a non-residential use by more than. applicable requirements such as minimum Clear 10%excluding expansions under 5,000 square feet. Vision areas near driveways and street intersections 9. A reduction in the area reserved for common open space and/or usable open may also be applicable depending on where the space that reduces the open space area below the minimum required by this building expansion is proposed to be constructed on code or reduces the open space area by more than ten percent. the site. 10. A reduction of project amenities (recreational facilities, screening, and/or, landscaping provisions) below the minimum established by this code or by more than 10%where specified in the site plan. 11. A modification to the conditions imposed at the time of Site Development Review approval that are not the subject of Criteria 1 through 10 above. APPLICANTS: To consider an application complete,you will need to submit ALL of the REQUIRED SUBMITTAL ELEMENTS as described on the front of this application in the"Required Submittal Elements"box. (Detailed Submittal Requirement Information sheets can be obtained,upon request,for all types of Land Use Applications.) THE APPLICANT(S) SHALL CERTIFY THAT: • The above request does not violate any deed restrictions that may be attached to or imposed upon the subject property. ♦ If the application is granted,the applicant will exercise the rights granted in accordance with the terms and subject to all the conditions and limitations of the approval. ♦ All of the above statements and the statements in the plot plan,attachments,and exhibits transmitted herewith,are true;and the applicants so acknowledge that any permit issued,based on this application,and may be revoked if it is found that any such statements are false. • The applicant has read the entire contents of the application, including the policies and criteria, and understands the requirements for approving or denying the application. SIGNATURES of each owner of the subject property. DATED this q/ I da y of 't' , ,20 0 kl.re C Owner's Signature Owner's Signature G L.a Owne Sig re Owner's Signature 1 S 136C D-00102 MCGRATH STANLEY R ET AL BY WILLIAM FLOBERG 834 SW ST CLAIR PORTLAND,OR 97205 s.r '16. 'remium $ 1, 620 . 00 PIONEER NATIONAL TITLE INSURANCE ATICOR COMPANY Policy of Title Insurance SUBJECT TO THE EXCLUSIONS FROM COVERAGE, THE EXCEPTIONS CONTAINED IN SCHEDULE B AND THE PROVISIONS OF THE CONDITIONS AND STIPULATIONS HEREOF, PIONEER NATIONAL TITLE INSURANCE COMPANY (a Stock Company), a California corporation, herein called the Company, insures, as of Date of Policy shown in Schedule A, against loss or damage, not exceeding the amount of insurance stated in Schedule A, and costs, attorneys' fees and expenses which the Company may become obligated to pay hereunder, sustained or incurred by the insured by reason of: 1. Title to the estate or interest described in Schedule A being vested otherwise than as stated therein; 2. Any defect in or lien or encumbrance on such title; 3. Lack of a right of access to and from the land; 4. Unmarketability of such title; 5. The invalidity or unenforceability of the lien of the insured mortgage upon said estate or interest except to the extent that such invalidity or unenforceability, or claim thereof, arises out of the transaction evidenced by the insured mortgage and is based upon a. usury, or b. any consumer credit protection or truth in lending law, 6. The priority of any lien or encumbrance over the lien of the insured mortgage; 7. Any statutory lien for labor or material which now has gained or hereafter may gain priority over the lien of the insured mortgage, except any such lien arising from an improvement on the land contracted for and commenced subsequent to Date of Policy not financed in whole or in part by proceeds of the indebtedness secured by the insured mortgage which at Date of Policy the insured has advanced or is obligated to advance; or 8. The invalidity or unenforceability of any assignment, shown in Schedule A, of the insured mortgage or the failure of said assignment to vest title to the insured mortgage in the named insured assignee free and clear of all liens. This policy shall not be valid or binding until countersigned below by a validating officer of the Company. Pioneer National Title Insurance Company by PRESIDENT Attest: SECRETARY Countersigned: By Validating Signatory PNTI (1-77) American Land Title Association Leasehold Loan Policy 1975 CR l..UlSUnwn7 tllw Ju�wauUlI t:Vnu•wev dlPU wnw.•, ..........,..y..... ..•......,....., irk I S C H E D U L E A Amount $720, 000 .00 Date August 5, 1982 At 8 : 00 A.M. Premium $ 1, 620 . 00 INSURED ROWLAND R. TIMMERMAN, LANA L. TIMMERMAN, WILLIAM C. FLOBERG and SALLY A. FLOBERG, doing business as LASAL LAND COMPANY OF THE NORTHWEST Title to the leasehold estate described in this Schedule is vested in: ROWLAND R. TIMMERMAN, LANA L. TIMMERMAN, WILLIAM C. FLOBERG and SALLY A. FLOBERG, all as tenants in common, doing business as LASAL LAND COMPANY OF THE NORTHWEST The leasehold estate, title to which is insured by this policy, is the estate of the lessee in the land described in this schedule, as set forth in that certain lease, together with and subject to the terms, covenants, and conditions thereof: Lease, including the terms and provisions thereof, From: Ruth McGrath, Stanley R. McGrath, Mary Ann McGrath, Mary Jensine McGrath, Stanley R. McGrath, Trustee for Piper Ann McGrath Trust, and Stanley R. McGrath, Trustee for Edward Stanley McGrath Trust, Helen Pedersen, Frances Pedersen and Jeanette Pedersen To: Rowland R. Timmerman, Lana L. Timmerman, William C. Floberg and Sally A. Floberg, all as tenants in common, doing business as Lasal Land Company of the Northwest Dated: June 27, 1980 Recorded: August 4, 1982 Fee No. : 82019827 Records of Washington County, Oregon. Description of the tract of land subject to said lease: PARCEL I : A Beginning at the re-entrant corner in the West line of the George Richardson Donation Land Claim No. 55, situated in Section 36, Township 1 South, Range 1 West of the Willamette Meridian, Washington County, Oregon; and running thence North on the West line of said claim, 392 . 78 feet to a point in the Southerly right of way line of County Road No. 975, also known as Pfaffle Road; thence following along said Southerly right of way line South 89° 48 ' East, a dis- Page 1 of Policy No. 34-A-114767 8-4-Q-1&2 ( '82 ) .. tance of 1732 .24 feet to an iron pipe, said iron pipe being the true point of beginning of this description; thence continuing South 89° 48 ' East, a distance of 476 . 14 feet to an iron pipe set in the Northwesterly right of way line of the West Side Pacific Highway No. 99; thence following along said highway right of way line on a curve to the right (the long chord of which bears South 55° 09 ' West, 460 . 0C feet) to an iron rod; thence North 33° 43 ' West a distance of 10 . 00 feet to an iron rod; thence on a curve to the right (the long chord of which bears South 56° 57 ' West, 143 .47 feet) to an iron pipe; thence leaving said highway right of way line North 0° 42 ' West, a distance of 79.49 feet; thence South 89° 48 ' East, 31 .08 feet to an iron pipe; thence North 0° 42 ' West, 254.88 feet to the true point of beginning of this description. PARCEL II : Beginning at the re-entrant corner in the West line of the George Richardson D.L.C. No. 55, in Section 36, Township 1 South, Range 1 West, of the Willamette Meridian, Washington County, Oregon, and running thence North on the West line of said claim, 392 . 78 feet to a point in the Southerly right of way line of County Road No. 975 (Pfaffle Road) ; thence following along said Southerly right of way line South 89° 48 ' East, 1580 .08 feet to an iron pipe, said iron pipe marking the true point of beginning of this description; thence con- tinuing South 89° 48 ' East, 152 . 16 feet to an iron pipe; thence South 0° 42 ' East, 254.88 feet to an iron pipe; thence North 89° 48 ' West, 152 .16 feet to an iron pipe; thence North 0° 42 ' West, 254.88 feet to the true point of beginning. PARCEL III : The following described real estate situated in the County of Washington, State of Oregon, described as follows, to-wit: Beginning at the re-entrant corner of the West line of George Richardson D. L.C. No. 55, in Section 36, Township 1 South, Range 1 West and running thence Northerly on the West line of said claim 392 .78 feet to a point on the South line of County Road No. 975; thence South 89° 48 ' East along the South line of said County Road 1463 . 88 feet to an iron pipe on the West line of the Florence Hammer tract of land as described on page 281, of Book 117 of Washington County, Oregon, Deed Records, which iron pipe is the true point of beginning of the tract herein described; running thence South 89° 48 ' East along the South line of said County Road No. 975, a distance of 116 .2 feet to an iron pipe on the West line of that certain tract conveyed to Charles E. Condon, 4 et ux, by deed recorded March 13 , 1943, in Book 215, page 637; thence South 0° 42 ' East parallel with the West line of said Hammer tract, 281 .15 feet to an iron pipe; at the Northeast corner of that certain tract conveyed to Herbert V. Kruse, by deed recorded June 6, • 1945, in Book 244, instrument No. 1103; thence North 89° 48 ' West, 116.2 feet along said Kruse tract to an iron pipe on the West line of the said Hammer tract; thence North 0° 42 ' West on said West line, 281 . 15 feet to the place of beginning. Page 2 of Policy No. 34-A-114767 8-4-Q-1&2 ( '82 ) PARCEL IV: Beginning at the re-entrant corner in the West line of the George Richardson D.L.C. No. 55, situated in Section 36, Township 1 South Range 1 West of the Willamette Meridian, Washington County, Oregon and running thence North on the West line of said claim, 392 . 78 feet to a point in the Southerly right of way line of the County Road No . 975, also known as Pfaffle Road; thence South 89° 48 ' East a dis- tance of 1580 .08 feet to an iron pipe; thence South 0° 42 ' East, a distance of 254. 88 feet to the true point of beginning of this de- scription; thence continuing South 0° 42 ' East, a distance of 145 . 72 feet to an intersection with the Northwesterly boundary line of the West Side Pacific Highway No . 99 ; thence following said Northwesterly boundary line North 57° 08 ' East, a distance of 31 .40 feet to an iron rod; thence South 32° 25 ' East, a distance of 10 .00 feet to an iron rod; thence on a curve to the left (the long chord of which bears North 56° 57 ' East, 105 . 38 feet) to an iron pipe; thence leaving said highway boundary line North 0° 42 ' West a distance of 79 .49 feet; thence North 89° 48 ' West, a distance of 121 . 08 feet to the true point of beginning of this description. Page 3 of Policy No. 34-A-114767 8-4-Q-1&2 ( ' 82) 114 CITY OF TIGARD 8/27/2007 p y 13125 SW Hall Blvd. 11:50:34AM Tigard,OR 97223 503.639.4171 TIGARD Receipt #: 27200700000000003922 Date: 08/27/2007 Line Items: Case No Tran Code Description Revenue Account No Amount Paid MMD2007-00025 [LANDUS] Minor Modification 100-0000-438000 500.00 MMD2007-00025 [LRPF] LR Planning Surcharge 100-0000-438050 74.00 Line Item Total: $574.00 ayments: Method Payer User ID Acct./Check No. Approval No. How Received Amount Paid Check NORTHWEST FRESH Ill LLC ST 7008 In Person 574.00 Payment Total: $574.00 cReceipt.rpt Page 1 of 1 Applicant's Statement We request a Minor Modification to our premises for the purpose of putting in a patio in front of the building. As proposed,the patio will cover what is now a gravel area between the restaurant and the landscaping. The landscaping will not be reduced and the building size will remain the same. After review of the Tigard Development Code, it is clear our proposed modification does not invoke any of the eleven criteria discussed within Section 18.360.050 (B), as detailed below: 1. An Increase in dwelling unit density or lot coverage for residential development. This is not a residential project,nor is there an increase in dwelling unit density or lot coverage. 2. A change in the ratio or number of different types of dwelling units. There are no dwelling units proposed,and this represents no change from the previous version of the Plan. 3.A change that requires additional on-site parking in accordance with Chapter 18.765. There are no increases in parking required for the addition of patio area. Parking increases are triggered by increases in the size of a building or covered seating area. The proposed patio would not be covered. 4. A change in the type of commercial or industrial structures as defined by the Uniform Building Code. There is no change in the type of commercial structure. This structure was and will remain for restaurant use. 5. An increase in the height of the building(s) by more than 20%. No increase in the height of the building is proposed. 6. A change in the type and location of accessways and parking areas where off-site traffic would be affected. As can be seen on the Exhibit,no change in accessways or parking areas is proposed. 7. An increase in vehicular traffic to and from the site and increase can be expected to exceed 100 vehicles per day. As the proposed Minor Modification does not change the use of the building, its size, or the allotted parking,no additional vehicular traffic can or should be inferred. 8. An increase in the floor area proposed for a non-residential use by more than 10% excluding expansions under 5,000 square feet. There is no increase in building size or floor area proposed. 9. A reduction in the area reserved for common space and/or usable open space that reduces the open space area below the minimum required by this code or reduces the open space area by more than 10%. There will be no reduction of common space or usable open space; in fact, this increases the area of usable space, as the patio replaces an area of dead space between the building and the landscaping. 10. A reduction of project amenities (recreational facilities,screening,and/or landscaping provisions) below the minimum established by this code or by more than 10% where specified in the site plan. There is no reduction of amenities. Currently,this space is unattractive and not part of landscaping or usable space. 11. A modification to the conditions imposed at the time of Site Development Review approval that are not the subject of Criteria 1 through 10 above. We are not aware of any conditions imposed at the time of Site Development that would apply to our proposed patio. Applicant's Statement We request a Minor Modification to our premises for the purpose of putting in a patio in front of the building. As proposed, the patio will cover what is now a gravel area between the restaurant and the landscaping. The landscaping will not be reduced and the building size will remain the same. After review of the Tigard Development Code, it is clear our proposed modification does not invoke any of the eleven criteria discussed within Section 18.360.050(B),as detailed below: 1. An Increase in dwelling unit density or lot coverage for residential development. This is not a residential project, nor is there an increase in dwelling unit density or lot coverage. 2. A change in the ratio or number of different types of dwelling units. There are no dwelling units proposed, and this represents no change from the previous version of the Plan. 3. A change that requires additional on-site parking in accordance with Chapter 18.765. There are no increases in parking required for the addition of patio area. Parking increases are triggered by increases in the size of a building or covered seating area. The proposed patio would not be covered. 4. A change in the type of commercial or industrial structures as defined by the Uniform Building Code. There is no change in the type of commercial structure. This structure was and will remain for restaurant use. 5. An increase in the height of the building(s)by more than 20%. No increase in the height of the building is proposed. 6. A change in the type and location of accessways and parking areas where off-site traffic would be affected. As can be seen on the Exhibit,no change in accessways or parking areas is proposed. 7.An increase in vehicular traffic to and from the site and increase can be expected to exceed 100 vehicles per day. As the proposed inferred. ed the allotted Minor Modification ��n increase pking, no dot noes not chi �vehicular ge die use i° excluding 8�the floor area traffic building, There is no increase area proposed fora non, or should be b', its In building feet.non-residential use y to crease . hreduction i p the ilding size o b ore the open space space area reserved for r floor area proposed. than There area by area el the minimum on space and/or�d increases will no reduction O re9uir by t�able open space of 1 U A r been the building f usable space °n space s code°r t tis t than landscaping o e d the Pati°o 'able en space;her specified provisions)beiowenih,�s(recreational landscaping es`,�area of d��act, this There is n ip tbeb tminim m es aal established space 11 part°f landscaping cti°n of amenities.plan. bLsbed by screening,and/or approval to or usable Currently, a or by more that are not the lip s space is unattractive �eild e not aware of Criteria° d at the time ve not apply to°u°p conditions - through 10 baVeDeveloPn�ep proposed �p°sed at the time of Development Review that site Developmen t that S W rrA, rLe 'T �... 19��. -- _ ii1 I J. , I L Lit o m a • • • ..••• • le-Y-'' t o6nK sra[.wx eFUIL 1401 PAno • morn iL . y \ F8 EN�tuJ� •, : . , • 6r foseaA.l , . 77' t Not 1 `� (-9`?' 0 ✓IT r t-AN 5 E : 1" r 2o,o. ....1,a. FPiL'S H 1168* .w Pie.4me.Frwy-11bAR0 oz. C 11r.2ob',IuwevWw, rim," 000111 ,ay.m 139 :AMY . S W IAA rL� ST tt-. lic 710 N N [ i t I , L.EbolOnoLi Pb.004i ) -ca\1 L r .1.. , m K-% 4-: ...• r�, / •� �rl f'lrst.1g srdvr we � / �uILvIN4,/ , 6tKy ` /// eno • -- 4 t ,,41r, .4`..•. A./ ',. 'fir. . •1, : • • 1......rosewa..V --k qr 0 11t p L1'si s l....1.:;11... zo, II685 5W PAC-i MG,14IAly-T16+t•R12 012- „.„„..q...........1:191.01, AMewow: Ii�uwwrIVH(1`(Nh{ 4A1t: IINIIm co.. Y Iwawa wren .emium $ 1, 620 . 00 PIONEER NATIONAL TITLE INSURANCE ATICOR COMPANY Policy of Title Insurance SUBJECT TO THE EXCLUSIONS FROM COVERAGE, THE EXCEPTIONS CONTAINED IN SCHEDULE B AND THE PROVISIONS OF THE CONDITIONS AND STIPULATIONS HEREOF, PIONEER NATIONAL TITLE INSURANCE COMPANY (a Stock Company), a California corporation, herein called the Company, insures, as of Date of Policy shown in Schedule A, against loss or damage, not exceeding the amount of insurance stated in Schedule A, and costs, attorneys' fees and expenses which the Company may become obligated to pay hereunder, sustained or incurred by the insured by reason of: 1. Title to the estate or interest described in Schedule A being vested otherwise than as stated therein; 2. Any defect in or lien or encumbrance on such title; 3. Lack of a right of access to and from the land; 4. Unmarketability of such title; 5. The invalidity or unenforceability of the lien of the insured mortgage upon said estate or interest except to the extent that such invalidity or unenforceability, or claim thereof, arises out of the transaction evidenced by the insured mortgage and is based upon a. usury, or b. any consumer credit protection or truth in lending law; 6. The priority of any lien or encumbrance over the lien of the insured mortgage; 7. Any statutory lien for labor or material which now has gained or hereafter may gain priority over the lien of the insured mortgage, except any such lien arising from an improvement on the land contracted for and commenced subsequent to Date of Policy not financed in whole or in part by proceeds of the indebtedness secured by the insured mortgage which at Date of Policy the insured has advanced or is obligated to advance; or 8. The invalidity or unenforceability of any assignment, shown in Schedule A, of the insured mortgage or the failure of said assignment to vest title to the insured mortgage in the named insured assignee free and clear of all liens. This policy shall not be valid or binding until countersigned below by a validating officer of the Company. Pioneer National Title Insurance Company by � ar r-k, h PRESIDENT 9a,Attest: SECRETARY Countersigned: By Validating Signatory PNTI (1-77)American Land Title Association Leasehold Loan Policy 1975 SR �.,l I IUILR/11b dl IU OU JU1d UUllb t.U11UllU U dnU t.IJI w,U, 'e .,.a•,...y..v. ......��..�„ S C H E D U L E A Amount $720, 000 .00 Date August 5, 1982 At 8:00 A.M. Premium $ 1, 620.00 INSURED ROWLAND R. TIMMERMAN, LANA L. TIMMERMAN, WILLIAM C. FLOBERG and SALLY A. FLOBERG, doing business as LASAL LAND COMPANY OF THE NORTHWEST Title to the leasehold estate described in this Schedule is vested in: ROWLAND R. TIMMERMAN, LANA L. TIMMERMAN, WILLIAM C. FLOBERG and SALLY A. FLOBERG, all as tenants in common, doing business as LASAL LAND COMPANY OF THE NORTHWEST The leasehold estate, title to which is insured by this policy, is the estate of the lessee in the land described in this schedule, as set forth in that certain lease, together with and subject to the terms, covenants, and conditions thereof: Lease, including the terms and provisions thereof, From: Ruth McGrath, Stanley R. McGrath, Mary Ann McGrath, Mary Jensine McGrath, Stanley R. McGrath, Trustee for Piper Ann McGrath Trust, and Stanley R. McGrath, Trustee for Edward Stanley McGrath Trust, Helen Pedersen, Frances Pedersen and Jeanette Pedersen To: Rowland R. Timmerman, Lana L. Timmerman, William C. Floberg and Sally A. Floberg, all as tenants in common, doing business as Lasal Land Company of the Northwest Dated: June 27, 1980 Recorded: August 4, 1982 Fee No. : 82019827 Records of Washington County, Oregon. Description of the tract of land subject to said lease: PARCEL I : A Beginning at the re-entrant corner in the West line of the George Richardson Donation Land Claim No. 55, situated in Section 36, Township 1 South, Range 1 West of the Willamette Meridian, Washington County, Oregon; and running thence North on the West line of said claim, 392 .78 feet to a point in the Southerly right of way line of County Road No. 975, also known as Pfaffle Road; thence following along said Southerly right of way line South 89° 48 ' East, a dis- Page 1 of Policy No. 34-A-114767 8-4-Q-1&2 ( '82 ) w. tance of 1732 .24 feet to an iron pipe, said iron pipe being the true point of beginning of this description; thence continuing South 89° 48 ' East, a distance of 476 .14 feet to an iron pipe set in the Northwesterly right of way line of the West Side Pacific Highway No. 99; thence following along said highway right of way line on a curve to the right (the long chord of which bears South 55° 09' West, 460.00 feet) to an iron rod; thence North 33° 43 ' West a distance of 10.00 feet to an iron rod; thence on a curve to the right (the long chord of which bears South 56° 57 ' West, 143 .47 feet) to an iron pipe; thence leaving said highway right of way line North 0° 42 ' West, a distance of 79.49 feet; thence South 89° 48 ' East, 31.08 feet to an iron pipe; thence North 0° 42 ' West, 254.88 feet to the true point of beginning of this description. PARCEL II : Beginning at the re-entrant corner in the West line of the George Richardson D.L.C. No. 55, in Section 36, Township 1 South, Range 1 West, of the Willamette Meridian, Washington County, Oregon, and running thence North on the West line of said claim, 392.78 feet to a point in the Southerly right of way line of County Road No. 975 (Pfaffle Road) ; thence following along said Southerly right of way line South 89° 48 ' East, 1580.08 feet to an iron pipe, said iron pipe marking the true point of beginning of this description; thence con- tinuing South 89° 48 ' East, 152 .16 feet to an iron pipe; thence South 0° 42 ' East, 254.88 feet to an iron pipe; thence North 89° 48 ' West, 152.16 feet to an iron pipe; thence North 0° 42 ' West, 254.88 feet to the true point of beginning. PARCEL III : The following described real estate situated in the County of Washington, State of Oregon, described as follows, to-wit: Beginning at the re-entrant corner of the West line of George Richardson D.L.C. No. 55, in Section 36, Township 1 South, Range 1 West and running thence Northerly on the West line of said claim 392 .78 feet to a point on the South line of County Road No. 975; thence South 89° 48 ' East along the South line of said County Road 1463 .88 feet to an iron pipe on the West line of the Florence Hammer tract of land as described on page 281, of Book 117 of Washington County, Oregon, Deed Records, which iron pipe is the true point of beginning of the tract herein described; running thence South 89° 48 ' East along the South line of said County Road No. 975, a distance of 116.2 feet to an iron pipe on the West line of that certain tract conveyed to Charles E. Condon, et ux, by deed recorded March 13, 1943, in Book 215, page 637; thence South 0° 42 ' East parallel with the West line of said Hammer tract, 281.15 feet to an iron pipe; at the Northeast corner of that certain tract conveyed to Herbert V. Kruse, by deed recorded June 6, 1945, in Book 244, instrument No. 1103; thence North 89° 48' West, 116.2 feet along said Kruse tract to an iron pipe on the West line of the said Hammer tract; thence North 0° 42 ' West on said West line, 281 . 15 feet to the place of beginning. Page 2 of Policy No. 34-A-114767 8-4-Q-1&2 ( '82 ) PARCEL IV: Beginning at the re-entrant corner in the West line of the George Richardson D.L.C. No. 55, situated in Section 36, Township 1 South Range 1 West of the Willamette Meridian, Washington County, Oregon and running thence North on the West line of said claim, 392 . 78 feet to a point in the Southerly right of way line of the County Road No . 975, also known as Pfaffle Road; thence South 89° 48 ' East a dis- tance of 1580 .08 feet to an iron pipe; thence South 0° 42 ' East, a distance of 254.88 feet to the true point of beginning of this de- scription; thence continuing South 0° 42 ' East, a distance of 145 .72 feet to an intersection with the Northwesterly boundary line of the West Side Pacific Highway No . 99 ; thence following said Northwesterly boundary line North 57° 08 ' East, a distance of 31 .40 feet to an iron rod; thence South 32° 25' East, a distance of 10 .00 feet to an iron rod; thence on a curve to the left (the long chord of which bears North 56° 57 ' East, 105.38 feet) to an iron pipe; thence leaving said highway boundary line North 0° 42 ' West a distance of 79 .49 feet; thence North 89° 48 ' West, a distance of 121. 08 feet to the true point of beginning of this description. Page 3 of Policy No. 34-A-114767 8-4-Q-1&2 ( ' 82) ADDITIONAL DOCUMENTS Emily Eng From: Todd Prager Sent: Thursday, November 08, 2007 11:44 AM To: 'randy_mihalko @landcare.com' Cc: Emily Eng Subject: Street Trees along 78th and 99W in Tigard Attachments: 18.745, Landscaping and Screening.pdf; Tigard Tree Manual.pdf; ODOT planting requirements.pdf Hi Randy, Please find the attached street tree planting standards(section 18.745.040.0 of the Tigard Municipal Code) and the Tigard Street Tree list. As we discussed, the plantings along both frontages need to meet our species and placement standards. Also, the planting along 99W needs to meet both ODOT and Tigard's standards. I attached ODOT standards to this email as well. If there is a conflict between ODOT and Tigard's standards, please contact me so that we can work out a solution. Finally, my preference is for you to plant the largest statured trees possible. If course things such as overhead utility lines and other space constraints should be taken into consideration. Feel free to contact me if you have any questions on the requirements, or if you think a site visit would be helpful. Sincerely, Todd Prager 503 718-2700 1 Emily Eng From: Emily Eng Sent: Thursday, November 08, 2007 4:02 PM To: 'randy_mihalko @landcare.com' Cc: Todd Prager; 'wflowberg@comcast.net' Subject: Baja Fresh Street Trees Attachments: image001.jpg Randy: This email summarizes our earlier conversation regarding the Baja Fresh site on Pacific Hwy and SW 78th Ave. Baja Fresh received Minor Modification approval to build a patio (MMD2007-00025). While the patio has been completed, City staff recently observed removal of all the landscaping along the site's frontage. We understand that the site is being re-landscaped; however,this activity should have been included in the Minor Modification proposal and the issue of street trees could have been addressed. Street trees are required along the project's frontage on Pacific Highway and SW 78th Avenue. Tigard Development Code Section 18.745.020.A states, "The provisions of this chapter [Landscaping and Screening] shall apply to all development including the construction of new structures, remodeling of existing structures where the landscaping is nonconforming (Section 18.760.040.C)..." Section 18.745.040.A states, "All development projects fronting on a public street, private street or a private driveway more than 100 feet in length approved after the adoption of this title shall be required to plant street trees in accordance with the standards in Section 18.745.040.C. " After speaking with you and the property owner(Bill Flowberg),the City agrees that the next course of action would be to submit a landscape plan indicating street trees along SW 78th Ave that meet City standards and street trees along Pacific Hwy that meet ODOT standards. A hold has been placed on final inspections for the Tenant Improvement (BUP2007-00479) until the trees are approved by the City Arborist and planted. Thank you for your cooperation. As you know, I will be away until the 14th. If you have any immediate questions, please contact Todd Prager(718-2700). Sincerely, Emily Eng Emily Eng 11111 Assistant Planner li $ P: (503)718-2712 _ F: (503)684-7297 T it ‘tI) 13125 SW Hall Blvd Tigard,OR 97223 www.tigard-or.gov 1 Todd Prager From: Todd Prager Sent: Friday, November 09, 2007 3:25 PM To: 'Mihalko, Randy J' Subject: RE: Street Trees along 78th and 99W in Tigard Hi Randy, I think the species are ok except for the Japanese Maples. We generally do not accept them as street trees. We do have other types of maples on our approved tree list that you may consider. Also, be sure to keep the spacing and placement criteria in mind before finalizing your plans. Feel free to let me know if you have any other questions. Thanks, Todd From: Mihalko, Randy J [mailto:Randy_Mihalko©landcare.com] Sent: Friday, November 09, 2007 9:52 AM To: Todd Prager Subject: RE: Street Trees along 78th and 99W in Tigard Todd, Our landscape design currently calls for.... Along 78`h 3 Magnolia grandiflora and 1 Cornus florida Along 99W 2 Acer japonica and 1 Betula utilis Please let me know if these are acceptable or if you would like to meet at the property to review. Randy Mihalko Portland South Branch Manager TRUGREEN LandCare 7920 SW Hunziker Street, Tigard OR 97223 Tel, 503-597-2350 Fax: 503-597-2351 From: Todd Prager [mailto:todd©tigard-or.gov] Sent: Friday, November 09, 2007 8:07 AM To: Mihalko, Randy J Subject: RE: Street Trees along 78th and 99W in Tigard Sorry Randy. I inadvertently sent the Tigard Tree Manual instead of the street tree list. Please find the attached street tree list. Thanks, Todd . S From: Mihalko, Randy J [mailto:Randy_Mihalko @landcare.com] Sent:Thursday, November 08, 2007 4:59 PM To:Todd Prager Subject: FW: Street Trees along 78th and 99W in Tigard Todd, Unless I missed it I don't see a list of acceptable species. Randy Mihalko Portland South Branch Manager TRUGREEN LandCare 7920 SW Hunziker Street, Tigard OR 97223 Tel: 503-597-2350 Fax: 503-597-2351 From: Mihalko, Randy J Sent:Thursday, November 08, 2007 4:53 PM To: 'Todd Prager' Cc: 'William Floberg' Subject: RE: Street Trees along 78th and 99W in Tigard Thanks Todd, I will review and call if I have any questions or see the need to meet. Randy Mihalko Portland South Branch Manager TRUGREEN LandCare 7920 SW Hunziker Street, Tigard OR 97223 Tel: 503-597-2350 Fax: 503-597-2351 From:Todd Prager [mailto:todd @tigard-or.gov] Sent:Thursday, November 08,2007 11:44 AM To: Mihalko, Randy J Cc: Emily Eng Subject:Street Trees along 78th and 99W in Tigard Hi Randy, Please find the attached street tree planting standards(section 18.745.040.0 of the Tigard Municipal Code)and the Tigard Street Tree list. As we discussed, the plantings along both frontages need to meet our species and placement standards. Also,the planting along 99W needs to meet both ODOT and Tigard's standards. I attached ODOT standards to this email as well. If there is a conflict between ODOT and Tigard's standards, please contact me so that we can work out a solution. Finally, my preference is for you to plant the largest statured trees possible. If course things such as overhead utility lines and other space constraints should be taken into consideration. Feel free to contact me if you have any questions on the requirements,or if you think a site visit would be helpful. Sincerely, 2 Todd Prager 503 718-2700 CONFIDENTIALITY NOTICE:the information contained in this e-mail, including any attachment(s), is confidential information that may be privileged and exempt from disclosure under applicable law. If the reader of this message is not the intended recipient,or if you received this message in error,then any direct or indirect disclosure, distribution or copying of this message is strictly prohibited. If you have received this message in error, please notify the ServiceMaster Help Desk immediately by calling(866) 597-4321 and by sending a return e-mail; delete this message; and destroy all copies, including attachments.Thank you. CONFIDENTIALITY NOTICE: the information contained in this e-mail, including any attachment(s), is confidential information that may be privileged and exempt from disclosure under applicable law. If the reader of this message is not the intended recipient, or if you received this message in error, then any direct or indirect disclosure, distribution or copying of this message is strictly prohibited. If you have received this message in error, please notify the ServiceMaster Help Desk immediately by calling(866) 597-4321 and by sending a return e-mail; delete this message; and destroy all copies, including attachments. Thank you. 3 43k 4i1414.. bl 31'41.16-4 a'N 3 Ilk " *WV • s _ # f S " . r IP ' .31 t . . . ---1 , : , . _ F 3 ! ' es ii-0;{ r' / ...-r icoo,,,4 \ 5 • a 11 f r u ... • ,;'‘7 sc: ow. ite, 1 'V.',. 1■. 0 e v. dtii} R i,� + ,w , � l �` r.fi • Community Development P �0I / II f`' GmvS k G ene wrod OA 7!ry 3oi �5� ti„ (or��rw p fqw �Jt r � f 7 c2o ^ cor44- t 7SI"Aoe . do/ s�� ,c) 71 f