Loading...
MMD2009-00021 MMD2009 00021 ROBINSON BUILDING CHANGE OF USE - SOURCE ACADEMY 1 NOTICE OF TYPE I DECISION w MINOR MODIFICATION (MMD) 2009-00021 ROBINSON BUILDING CHANGE OF USE 120 DAYS = 12-09-09 SECTION I. APPLICATION SUMMARY FILE NAME: ROBINSON BUILDING CHANGE OF USE — SOURCE ACADEMY CASE NO.: Minor Modification (MMD) MMD2009-00021 PROPOSAL: The proposal is to change the use of 14,750 sq. ft. of retail space to indoor entertainment. The additional parking required by this change will be incorporated into a complete re-surfacing and re-striping of the parking lot. Landscaping will be enhanced and increased by 1%. Street trees will be planted and landscaping will be installed on the east and south boundaries and cosmetic landscaping will be placed at various points on the east and south sides of the building. No changes will be made to the access drives. APPLICANT: CIDA OWNER: Robinson Family Trust Kourtney Strong 21360 NW Amberwood Dr. 4445 SW Barbur Blvd., #200 Hillsboro, OR 97124 Portland, OR 97239 LOCATION: 11101 SW Greenburg Road;WCTM 1S135BC,Tax Lot 01100. ZONING DESIGNATION: MUC: Mixed Use Commercial District. The MUC zoning district includes land around the Washington Square Mall and land immediately west of Highway 217. Primary uses permitted include office buildings, retail, and service uses. Also permitted are mixed-use developments and housing at densities of 50 units per acre. Larger buildings are encouraged in this area with parking under, behind or to the sides of buildings. APPLICABLE REVIEW CRITERIA: Community Development Code Chapters 18.360, 18.390, 18.530 and 18.765. SECTION II. DECISION Notice is hereby given that the City of Tigard Community Development Director's designee has APPROVED the above request subject to certain conditions of approval. The findings and conclusions on which the decision is based are noted in Section IV. MMD2009-00021 Robinson Building Change of Use Decision 081209 Page 1 CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL , PRIOR TO THE REQUEST FOR FINAL BUILDING INSPECTION, THE FOLLOWING CONDITIONS SHALL BE SATISFIED 1. Applicant shall install one hundred twenty parking spaces as shown on the approved site plan. 2. Applicant shall request final inspection of this land use permit by the Planning Division prior to requesting final inspection by the Building Division for certificate of occupancy. THIS APPROVAL SHALL BE VALID FOR 18 MONTHS FROM THE EFFECTIVE DATE OF THIS DECISION. SECTION III. BACKGROUND INFORMATION Site Information: The subject property is located at the northwest corner of the intersection of Greenburg Road and Tiedeman Avenue. The building and its uses were existing when the property was annexed and has been in continuous occupancy. The indoor entertainment tenant occupied its space without review by the Planning or Building Divisions, though this is a permitted use under the current MUG Zone designation. Proposal Description: The proposal is to change the use of 14,750 sq. ft. of retail space to indoor entertainment. The additional parking required by this change will be incorporated into a complete re-surfacing and re- striping of the parking lot. Landscaping will be enhanced and increased by 1%. Street trees will be planted and landscaping will be installed on the east and south boundaries and cosmetic landscaping will be placed at various points on the east and south sides of the building. No changes will be made to the access drives. SECTION IV. APPLICABLE REVIEW CRITERIA AND FINDINGS COMPLIANCE WITH COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT CODE SECTIONS: MINOR MODIFICATION OF SITE DEVELOPMENT REVIEW: Section 18.360.050.B contains the following criteria for approval of a request for Minor Modification: Section 18.360.050.B states that the Director shall determine that a major modification will result if one or more of the following changes are proposed. There will be: 1. An increase in dwelling unit density, or lot coverage for residential development; There are no dwelling units on the property. Therefore, this criterion does not apply. 2. A change in the ratio or number of different types of dwellings; There are no dwelling units on the property. Therefore, this criterion does not apply. 3. A change that requires additional on-site parking in accordance with Chapter 18.765. The proposal requires re-striping the parking lot to provide 120 spaces, including the amended occupancy. Additional parking area is not required to be developed on the site. Therefore, this criterion is satisfied. MMD2009-00021 Robinson Building Change of Use Decision 081209 Page 2 4. A change in the type of commercial or industrial structi. as defined by the Uniform Building Code; There are no proposed changes in the type of structures. Therefore, this criterion does not apply. 5. An increase in the height of the building(s) by more than 20%; There is no proposed change in building height. Therefore, this criterion does not apply. 6. A change in the type and location of access ways and parking areas where off-site traffic would be affected; The proposal does not change the type or location of access ways or parking areas where off- site traffic would be affected. Therefore, this criterion does not apply. 7. An increase in vehicular traffic to and from the site and the increase can be expected to exceed 100 vehicles per day; The closest description in the ITE Trip Generation Manual, 8th Edition, for this property is Land Use 770, Business Park, which includes retail, warehousing, and recreational use. The percentages are close enough to those of the study that there is no significant vehicle trip increase expected. Therefore, this criterion is satisfied. 8. An increase in the floor area proposed for a nonresidential use by more than 10% excluding expansions under 5,000 square feet; The change of use does not involve an increase in floor area. Therefore, this criterion is satisfied. 9. A reduction in the area reserved for common space and/or usable open space which reduces the open space area below the minimum required by this code or reduces the open space area by more than 10%; The proposal does not reduce the area reserved for common space or usable open space. Therefore, this criterion does not apply. 10. A reduction of project amenities below the minimum established by this code or by more than 10%where specified in the site plan: a. Recreational facilities; b. Screening; and/or c. Landscaping provisions. The proposal does not reduce the project amenities. The existing landscaped area is less than the minimum required, but it is proposed to be re-planted and increased from 12% to 13%. Therefore, this criterion is satisfied. 11. A modification to the conditions imposed at the time of site development review approval which are not the subject of B 1 through 10 above of this subsection. The proposal does not modify conditions imposed at the time of side development review approval which are not the subject of B1 through 10 above of this subsection. FINDING: Based on the analysis above, Staff finds that the criteria for minor modification of a site development have been met. MMD2009-00021 Robinson Building Change of Use Decision 081209 Page 3 SECTION V. PROCEDURE AND APPEAL INFORMATION Notice: Notice was posted at City Hall and mailed to: X The applicant and owners X Affected government agencies Final Decision: A Minor Modification is a Type I procedure. As such, the Director's decision is final on the date it is mailed or otherwise provided to the applicant,whichever occurs first. The Director's decision may not be appealed locally and is the final decision of the City. THIS DECISION IS FINAL ON AUGUST 12, 2009 AND BECOMES EFFECTIVE ON AUGUST 13, 2009. Questions: If you have any questions, please call the City of Tigard Planning Division, Tigard City Hall, 13125 SW Hall Boulevard,Tigard, Oregon at (503) 639-4171. I August 12. 2009 APPROVED BY: Darrel"H 'Watkins DATE Assistant Planner MMD2009-00021 Robinson Building Change of Use Decision 081209 Page 4 4.1.1,..: ` VICINITY MAP • • • y n MMD2009-00021 • `` o _ j SOURCE ACADEMY l.____, i`i ¢ �`� • ; ' SHADY LN r 4VMlLis Of Ntal e , c -.. ] � � oF , �-_J 1 L ______.....r L____.._.1 '�� I [ r1 Cr�k Subject Site 4 I [ nsh WINDSOR PI" Stock Suit Green way , I Shady Lane '�y E —^ , y ...� i •,r f fit" / � c�- .......E I1 , N F1 e• 1--:.J C-1-11? fly id CF \ oiR w CC 1- Li Li . w > NORTH DAKOTA ST 4 } &, NORTH DAKOTA ST J J� • a to/1E1U Cn'elt H a. { c W y ij r F .. cr 2 I W & I ■ 1 location L3 Informaon on this 4. only and should be verified is for withgthee 2 4, I Development 0 I ' --- 7, Services Division. I AA F r__..._ ! V Scale 1:4,314-1 in=360 ft i.._..._ I ,_.I I Map punted at 12-Aug-09 01:32 i'M 7 GR�� as DATA IS DERNED FROM MULTIPLE SOURCES.THE CITY OF TIGARD 7777 MAKES NO WARRANTY.REPRESENTATION OR GUARANTEE AS TO THE I } ��� C/JNTENT,ACCURACY,TIMELINESS OR COMPLETENESS OF ANY OF THE .f 71yarU Strrel RJJlttull DATA CITY ONS.OR N ACSUMNTH f„ O ATA PROVI ANYERRORS,E OMISSIONS.OIOR INACCURACIES DSH SSUIE THE r� Q INFORMATION PROVIDED REGARDLESS OF HOW CAUSED. YL City of I igard 7 a 131825 SW Hall Blvd FT 1 ��qP -1-IGARMAPS Tigard.89477123 42 • I,I `� 0 3 5 9ft www.tigard-or.gov N. TIGARD Si q • / • ^� KEYNOTES T. • 1 `^ O (M)10'-0'N M'-0'01U TRASH ENODSUIE-SEE L I / O (In f0'-0•N 10•-0"011 TRASH ENCLOSURE-SEE •." 1 ^ (' -___------- L—_______ / Qi lM)FRIRLC[0 CI111 L u� e, _—_—_—_— / O Dew ARa OF to AERIRO ;ce@ ---------------------- E "10:00•NE ECM-TM :'.vo I - - -------------------------- ------------ ' O (MJ C(War E wALNWAT %�� _— - -. I O RELOC lE KL(E)LERIRC METERS 10 WOWED AREA ,f!/!:' / -f.00PORNlE 1N1R 511BCOM11UC10R J! 1 , O R000AlE HL(n LAS LIElE1R 10 RIpUiED IRFA- EOOIpwrt RN11$URCOInwClpt ( . on SfIGA ow EWIRY-SQ RTE►e/Alt • rll //� Os z �.� I / ,e (M)MIRO,Mak E•••-EQ DEVILS./u.l. ... o., O E,AS 1 L/IJ 1 • 1 / / 1I RI anwr SPUD ELR/ Yak' v / ) � L. .k. ` i '°i '. 0 on SURD ADA MUMMY ® ' % , _z • Ir O / I. l -� 001 #o , ▪ DRFN 6P 7 / ▪ � O • ...„,..4, �• / • re)u MEER / •• •-' i / m (n caRRRRC•noM■M1RIaLE h -• . / • (E)COMMMCATION RISER • '. .. _`� I P (E)PEDESTRIAN POLE g - / / . • (E)EN'JIM BOF • 1 •.„.„,„,......,r . eon ISMS 1 ; 1 I (E)BOLLARD,la 10•aR01 I - i ,• .. _ ».W .. .. .E." r' _.��. I I • (E)POWER MCP - ' F 1•' — I A CO UTILITY POLE ).. - — N.ED. �_ Cp z ( 1 le I I • E)ECM PM I lE1 ENRNM R•LE LIaNrt lNM C M / ,p�o r I • (El ELEGIAC IM4L 0 N / I . O E: ' e ([)POnfR 11ElEA m CO ;jf . ' I / . (E)1RNISEORYER la Z.. / I I Z Z �. A ••/•` .. A. / ;i I ® (E)PowER YAM/ TM"MM.TOME. _/ et ee ® (E)RATER VAULT (7 W• ��� : f o I I ' (H)eFLL MOUNT--- Ea O i I • (E)GT01 BASIN Ij u • 11a �O - Inl I ReIPIWAN Cr v Q s OQ,�ugyn�Ay,�v//HiI'•s_!i�v�i 0 j I • EauMD Wm-.MONUMENT .— j �� O s 5UNEY C ROI POOR ^~ `\ //%r ,�� m / `O m �wisi"i"„Iiiii�/Y/ice j DIMON Ell:... • I ntaa� I I I II I /i I I 1�1aLr� . � `` / I I a ,.rsauee[owe` I I I I 1M♦•MOD m.law — T q 1 I 1 a oar OMB._ _ J mMS11i 0.Aw CITY OF TIGARD I ' I I I Approved ' i 'mdrtionally Approved i I I I y F ar only the work as described in: j PEPIMITNO/4/4/ 62 -o�d} 1 i i i See Letter to:Follow i J 1 6 �r I I I MN.Mm P Attach •. Job Add as:LL(O/ A O•� Pa. _Date:., l.;�.___• Q SITE PLAN f'1 , Trenching at 11133 Greenburg — 9-3-09 I ..„ .„.._ I - .... ... -. . 0. + . .. . a 1 j 1 411 1 1 .... Al ■ , .. , . .... -^' N . . . . .. - '... - '''.,:•-* ,f, ,... ,_ +.. ..). lik , • . 44 i Ni . . . ,....y....."21.• t — ..................--•—••-• Noma". '..... 1 , 4 • t _, 7.1114%.,.., ""•!.": 'MIL IIIIMII imaillIr.-...°44.4. ' • iiii. ' - ' - Sit--- . • ' "ft---- , Ilk ,...........,";•,.....-- • Nql{g8r-silmr ... •...... . VI" --- ..2$ ,...- ...., - ..... v, .. . ..f 11141/4.. j'Et. .■r 4 .. , • ., .R - , ' *g$4 lk . - ,„ • , . y. -... • . ,,. . , 4. .... -'. .:-. .;,... . . . ....- .;0IR . . . , . ,...., . . . ,,. • , ... _ - : ■:':" -0 t --"' I .,.• L " ' ,-. 01' • • - •.* , 4=..., • - - _. ., ■ . - T „if•-‘,$.40; A;„-. - . . • . . IT , . . . '. , „I.:11. W tr', • ; • ,- . . - . • ,lo _, . . ..,... . . . , ....... , •. ,. . - , •iit ...... ..... _...__ ,,,. , ,,A7, .., ,-1 ,---• . ...' ft :' RIO ._ ........mat...7, 1, :«S•' '. , • s .. ' .'• ' '”..';':' 4- ''''.4`...,... .-..-.:211,14:- ....‘..w.,..-. .i."'4*- ' > ' . .in, ,:.-.;.i.i..'' ,- ..... ...-- . . . .‘ '-',. ',..,-- • '...-: 7- 1.4:f..?,4 f. -.' ' -.1":.-4,..-- *' • '2...e.'-**,* - • - '';'*- -- '-' ---`'--- • ...‘," .,.. . •--7,...- - .. - - 1 I ,VINOVIIONI,111 " '.-; . ': ‘ ,f,• $4,•• ,'of. ' '-(4.: : -'r f;:,,i;;„ditgetirP ,- ._,_ ....,,,.. , ,."--%,',';.47 ,7-,:- , ,:::: - . . . ._,.. , _ 7....",,,,,, 1 , . ... . ''• 1.,.. .. . , . ,I.k... ....- .- . . .-e-1.41'• . ' f.., ;' :.- `‘'""*:''7 ='•' 1... ..., . .. -7"‘"...-....,__- ''. : - :*. '","..1,-- - .., ,,.-• '''' , 14kV`.-4;•"*- • , . 1:-...V.:.''''' ,--:, . 1,4.'411.il .,.:••• - . ' 4 Z ,r1m..46.Vt.':' .. '''' - '. 7`.... iA.L.'. ' '. ' ' ''.:"'•"10:4#.4'-'4.1''''' ",'. ,''''.--- "...' - -4"--,,-;..,,.-- „".?,....i.'4''' ... v.'''Ir.=..--.,:--. .•'... - , .-,44....:;:.::,.?......e.. )- . t „7-11,„,, , ,,.... ., ,3, • ...,,„,..4,..,. ...A-, .,, ;, .k..,..,!.....„ ...;,,,_. , . . ,., . •-,1/2.1..., . "*--- -...t77' 4 , . 412, '''-...4g 1"74-,,: -,,:1-.c.ri.- -7.''''•'-'7*.-;.,,,' :k*-;,^,-.."-!*t. -- . —. • - ''• *N111$1,:64: str ... - "-- .! '''''' . .- ...0.4—: V.'."4:1. -40- ...f'',i.": ''•"' / r"'*4--•„:„...,,-.,•-• - •...--.-..". ....;_ ... . , . *at* :-.--:.. ---* -,-::,16/1c-7#4:.:1--, '. ....;.. /-4!7H.--jj.:.:.••••.--.,-..,„:,;,;,•,,,..,,,,;,,,... .,-.. . , , . -10 '4'''''''",;:-;: •'"*7 .-.....t>..,...•••,-,:.,...:',Z1,:.....i•-:::. .../...'',.i.,*...-;',,-:..,.:.::4.5„;.1,'4.,' ''''.4:::::::,,,=?... , . .. . JH ..-- -. . • . . SS :-, ''"''r'4'.- 0.;A-'4,4",:.!"1(..x'.',..:. ' • ',... -• ,... -• ' .- ''' '''.;,.., , •'-... ,, ,v. -...., . . ' '.-- :',,,I...-.',2..-i,-tif.''-'-,:i',....-11%.:',..,,2'-'' .- • '''' . ' -'':‘'....'"'"::''- ' ' ' . `, ' .-- . '.';..-„, . ' ,'"•''':;..,.—:'.-,',,--',.>,,..,',','.:,•,`','•c'.'-'-4''.'','",:.••e"''-'"':';,•.,;V-..:'r'•,',',,'•',F'k'.:1•,''k'-=e*,•l;.e,s i-"0,--•'':',''".',''`':i'`t.-4.':.,"1,-,,,k-i,'l,f•.ii;;'`:;:,•••::•.:t!::•-'._'.'.'''.'..2'''-'''''":''':.,i'.'',.,4-"-•---,-,',"''i'S,1,'':':',.?•.".':-.-t',",,,'.••I',.',;i;,iZ r-‘.:'..•.:i',„,....'':''',-'i'•-'i,.,,:..,.,i'-‘:.`-::..,.,-.:...-.t,.-.i:,:.-,..,;,''i.•,-i',•.‘;''•.,.,V,,.,,,:,-,.i.f-"•,7•.."4.-:.;'.7e,"1.'.....-,-..•••-••--.-•,„•:.'-.,...',`r--,.;...'---.-..-".':-:,-,'..•„,:•-..,.,','.,':''. ,„' .-,.-.,... '.:.'.•.,-.4--02...,., ,.'..,,--Y•, T... '-,;---:.,'4-'i i'''',:;;',•1 1::''''-''':''' '''.`'''''7', . '•. ,-',- '• ' i SS % „ - 4 4. !t --1•--,:'.,1,,,,,.''. i •, , 1; ,' 4 ;55 4 "5 ' . _ : • ;''' . - - . • L.: -*'''-.'.'-'.-'''.7W..,',,'/.,,,'":•-,,'-''''J',,,':.e:.' ..,'"• '+.. „-- • • 5 , ' '' ' - ' . • • -,.- '-. 5 .- '' - .- . - "k. - n • r.'„.■ ■ ' -.- • . . 4 . - r . . , .,..., :,..,.:,..,..,.,,,..., _.,, • ',.. . , ,: _ -.,. , - 1, ,, ' ''.• ,, . ', . I ' . *4!Z.•* Z;,..:' ' ''''. ' ''‘:, .,,' '11'...4.. . .":,.. ''' ':,...:.,•,:-., ,./. — . .. . '''..4..- . ., , ,-`""A•.s,.' 1.-;•,:...'":,.- ;:-.---,:,'2' '. -, '-..'''-•,-...,:i..,:,:-...,;",-:•-•'-:',•...;,,,,:t-..;-:: ,-",‘'".'':Z.,'''' -:.; -.,-,,.. •,',.4........ - ..•••-- ' • • • - -'-':,• 4 " ,?..-4-..... 4 4 44,7,4 j'' ' i ' • - : ' .-;Lk' . . :■5t- .Z.' '-':. 74.‘4.4.., ''''. •.•:. ..• .....-,.•; .-,•'. - 4 ••••:. '' ." -- :`',,..,:-....•.-.',- ---- ' • ..,...'. -------.,,' - -,..,- ' -' — -:*-.- ,s '''':,,-`, • ---. -•.-.., .•-•:-•--,,,,t-•-•.°.... „ , _ ,...,.• ,- . ,, ...., , • . . .. . . • ,,. .., ,. .. • ••• c.-.--•=••• - ..- . ..•--: ',.-, ---”' - .;:,..,,,, . - •., • .• -4••-•' - • ''. ' ' ' 11133 Greenburg Road 6-24-09 yam„-,, re,,L.,,,„, i ,,,,.. ‘. „,, _ . . .. .,,,,,,„„,„,,,... .,- . . , , ,. ,,:r...t.,--„. , r‘ ,.,„. .., „.. • .. .. „....„.: : 4. .. . , ,.. ,..../ ,- ,,„,. _. , ...,„. , _ ....,„..„ . „.„.., .. . . , . _ • ....„ . , „„., * .4 • -' t"'iE•M sj f=r qMillrr South Side Northwest Corner • 41111 lipor • 11„. ' — 7IL -. R r- a y v IIIII .1.11111111 West Side East Side 4 1171! AFFIDAVIT OF MAILING I,Patricia L. Lunsford,being first duly sworn/affirm,on oath depose and say that I am a Planning Assistant for the City of Tigard, Washington County,Oregon and that I served the following: (Check App op.iae Box(s)Bdow} © NOTICE OF DEQSION FOR MMD2009-00021/SOURCE ACADEMY (File No/Name Reference) AMENDED NOTICE City of Tigard Planning Director A copy of the said notice being hereto attached,marked Exhibit"A",and by reference made a part hereof,was mailed to each named person(s) at the address(s) shown on the attached list(s),marked Exhibit"B",and by reference made a part hereof,on A • t 12 2009 and deposit the Unite. tate .• on August 12,2009 postage prepaid. (Person tha repare once) STATE OF OREGON County of Washington ss. City of Tigard Subscribed and sworn/affirmed before me on the day of 6Cd-t EL ,2009. OFFICIAL SEAL SHIRLEY L TREAT NOTARY PUBLIC-OREGON t77-7,0 COMMISSION NO.416777 / J-4113 MY COMMISSION EXPIRES APRIL 25,2011 • ARY PUB C OF OREGON My Commission Expires: 411Y ( EXHIBIT A NOTICE OF TYPE I DECISION • MINOR MODIFICATION (MMD) 2009-00021 i ROBINSON BUILDING CHANGE OF USE T I GA RD 120 DAYS = 12-09-09 SECTION I. APPLICATION SUMMARY FILE NAME: ROBINSON BUILDING CHANGE OF USE—SOURCE ACADEMY CASE NO.: Minor Modification (MMD) MMD2009-00021 PROPOSAL: The proposal is to change the use of 14,750 sq. ft. of retail space to indoor entertainment. The additional parking required by this change will be incorporated into a complete re-surfacing and re-striping of the parking lot. Landscaping will be enhanced and increased by 1%. Street trees will be planted and landscaping will be installed on the east and south boundaries and cosmetic landscaping will be placed at various points on the east and south sides of the building. No changes will be made to the access drives. APPLICANT: CIDA OWNER: Robinson Family Trust Kourtney Strong 21360 NW Amberwood Dr. 4445 SW Barbur Blvd., #200 Hillsboro, OR 97124 Portland, OR 97239 LOCATION: 11101 SW Greenburg Road;WCTM 1S135BC,Tax Lot 01100. ZONING DESIGNATION: MUC: Mixed Use Commercial District. The MUC zoning district includes land around the Washington Square Mall and land immediately west of Highway 217. Primary uses permitted include office buildings, retail, and service uses. Also permitted are mixed-use developments and housing at densities of 50 units per acre. Larger buildings are encouraged in this area with parking under, behind or to the sides of buildings. APPLICABLE REVIEW CRITERIA: Community Development Code Chapters 18.360, 18.390, 18.530 and 18.765. SECTION II. DECISION Notice is hereby given that the City of Tigard Community Development Director's designee has APPROVED the above request subject to certain conditions of approval. The findings and conclusions on which the decision is based are noted in Section IV. MMD2009-00021 Robinson Building Change of Use Decision 081209 Page 1 CONDITIONS OF APPROVA... PRIOR TO THE REQUEST FOR FINAL BUILDING INSPECTION, THE FOLLOWING CONDITIONS SHALL BE SATISFIED 1. Applicant shall install one hundred twenty parking spaces as shown on the approved site plan. 2. Applicant shall request final inspection of this land use permit by the Planning Division prior to requesting final inspection by the Building Division for certificate of occupancy. THIS APPROVAL SHALL BE VALID FOR 18 MONTHS FROM THE EFFECTIVE DATE OF THIS DECISION. SECTION III. BACKGROUND INFORMATION Site Information: The subject property is located at the northwest corner of the intersection of Greenburg Road and Tiedeman Avenue. The building and its uses were existing when the property was annexed and has been in continuous occupancy. The indoor entertainment tenant occupied its space without review by the Planning or Building Divisions, though this is a permitted use under the current MUC Zone designation. Proposal Description: The proposal is to change the use of 14,750 sq. ft. of retail space to indoor entertainment. The additional parking required by this change will be incorporated into a complete re-surfacing and re- striping of the parking lot. Landscaping will be enhanced and increased by 1%. Street trees will be planted and landscaping will be installed on the east and south boundaries and cosmetic landscaping will be placed at various points on the east and south sides of the building. No changes will be made to the access drives. SECTION IV. APPLICABLE REVIEW CRITERIA AND FINDINGS COMPLIANCE WITH COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT CODE SECTIONS: MINOR MODIFICATION OF SITE DEVELOPMENT REVIEW: Section 18.360.050.B contains the following criteria for approval of a request for Minor Modification: Section 18.360.050.B states that the Director shall determine that a major modification will result if one or more of the following changes are proposed. There will be: 1. An increase in dwelling unit density, or lot coverage for residential development; There are no dwelling units on the property. Therefore, this criterion does not apply. 2. A change in the ratio or number of different types of dwellings; There are no dwelling units on the property. Therefore, this criterion does not apply. 3. A change that requires additional on-site parking in accordance with Chapter 18.765. The proposal requires re-striping the parking lot to provide 120 spaces, including the amended occupancy. Additional parking area is not required to be developed on the site. Therefore, this criterion is satisfied. MMD2009-00021 Robinson Building Change of Use Decision 081209 Page 2 • 4. A change in the ;e of commercial or industrial struct_ .s as defined by the Uniform Building Code; There are no proposed changes in the type of structures. Therefore, this criterion does not apply. 5. An increase in the height of the building(s) by more than 20%; There is no proposed change in building height. Therefore,this criterion does not apply. 6. A change in the type and location of access ways and parking areas where off-site traffic would be affected; The proposal does not change the type or location of access ways or parking areas where off- site traffic would be affected. Therefore, this criterion does not apply. 7. An increase in vehicular traffic to and from the site and the increase can be expected to exceed 100 vehicles per day; The closest description in the ITE Trip Generation Manual, 8th Edition, for this property is Land Use 770, Business Park, which includes retail, warehousing, and recreational use. The percentages are close enough to those of the study that there is no significant vehicle trip increase expected. Therefore, this criterion is satisfied. 8. An increase in the floor area proposed for a nonresidential use by more than 10% excluding expansions under 5,000 square feet; The change of use does not involve an increase in floor area. Therefore, this criterion is satisfied. 9. A reduction in the area reserved for common space and/or usable open space which reduces the open space area below the minimum required by this code or reduces the open space area by more than 10%; The proposal does not reduce the area reserved for common space or usable open space. Therefore, this criterion does not apply. 10. A reduction of project amenities below the minimum established by this code or by more than 10%where specified in the site plan: a. Recreational facilities; b. Screening; and/or c. Landscaping provisions. The proposal does not reduce the project amenities. The existing landscaped area is less than the minimum required, but it is proposed to be re-planted and increased from 12% to 13%. Therefore, this criterion is satisfied. 11. A modification to the conditions imposed at the time of site development review approval which are not the subject of B 1 through 10 above of this subsection. The proposal does not modify conditions imposed at the time of side development review approval which are not the subject of B1 through 10 above of this subsection. FINDING: Based on the analysis above, Staff finds that the criteria for minor modification of a site development have been met. MMD2009-00021 Robinson Building Change of Use Decision 081209 Page 3 SECTION V. PROCEDURE AND APPEAL INFORMATION Notice: Notice was posted at City Hall and mailed to: X The applicant and owners X Affected government agencies Final Decision: A Minor Modification is a Type I procedure. As such, the Director's decision is final on the date it is mailed or otherwise provided to the applicant,whichever occurs first. The Director's decision may not be appealed locally and is the final decision of the City. THIS DECISION IS FINAL ON AUGUST 12, 2009 AND BECOMES EFFECTIVE ON AUGUST 13, 2009. Questions: If you have any questions,please call the City of Tigard Planning Division,Tigard City Hall, 13125 SW Hall Boulevard,Tigard,Oregon at (503) 639-4171. I,, ► , August 12.2009 APPROVED BY: Darrel"H T':'Watkins DATE Assistant Planner MMD2009-00021 Robinson Building Change of Use Decision 081209 Page 4 ;. 1 j VICINITY MAP lik_____ . 1, , s MMD2009-00021 { i SOURCE ACADEMY L . 0 -- --, ---,--. ..—--- . -....■.--— r Ltd iMoeswtLa. , —__ Q• • t} � • i a f ] Subject Site •WI �` I't L 1 WINDSOR PL Hwc>w But laeenway I � � ^' _.„:.;:irriede 190 s � * $ , C e,�rµY _I'. ' ; 0 , _ t 1513C11Da __ -�Q Q -g 7 j t I . J . . {0 77,..p.a NORTH DAKOTA ST _. . - NORTH DAKOTA ST d PJ 0'• I - roam Crook _i I_HI a� . ,f__ 0 _ ,' .-.i i 17 --__--:: . 0 • te e I 5 /f' only and Information on this map is for general location i I Li El ��/,"�A� only and should be verified with the Development '.V. : ,l'� d'--- Services Division. V ~ Scale 1:4,314-1 in=360 tt •" ,/•> - = Map punted at 12-Aug-09 01:32 PM , ' #.'. i-Z7'.' (V/ � ��; i a MANES IS WARRANTY,ROM MULREPRESENTATION SOURCES.WARANTE�TN]AR THE CONTENT.ACCURACY IMELINESS OR COMPLETENESS OF ANY OF THE DATA PROVIDED HEREIN.THE CRY OF TIGARD SHALL ASSUME NO � {''� 4 At LIABILITY FOR ANY ERRORS.OMISSIONS OR INACCURACIES IN THE r �yald YAM w A f j \ / INFORMATION PROVIDED REGARDLESS OF HOW CAUSED. © City of t gam • i 13125 SW Hall Blvd • 4q' Tigam60R 97223\ QU• 371 Q www.bgam or.gov r I L:A H n �lbwlM .TgARD ST- [IR' s —��.,_ •J — — I +� KEYNOTES ( T. ' +` O (N)10'-0"x A•-0'0w TRAsx ENCLOSURE-SEE \ i'R,^.DETAL TOM, f ;0'-0•au TR SN f]1LtDS1M[-SQ ^,a'i —+ / O O CINB L-------- — ----------------- ------------------ ' O «R)ASPIVII ; -------- ----------- ------------ ___ _______________ O6 (X)CONE%1E MAMMY SS iE? --_.._____. O RElOGIE AI(E)FTECT•O NftERs TO NOIcATE0 AREA � -CWI.NRTE 1MTx s11ECaNIWCT011 / / p �/ 4 • % ' • • % // / O I 1 /. , A f I(cAsE I + aT m Tn t si R"•'OCTMlS N/w - w 1. / /O LED it % O / / A 4 (E)ROOF ORAN (n«S,RAVE [E� ` 0♦O , • aJ GAS NEtu •• In 03.11.103.11.11.11011 11•001.1 gg.1117i j f % / isAri.!{) . _ _ ... . /.'•'�r Y.,:• • 1..+ •+-•`.ILI.•i■.i�s ce. .w.ls` — I i'I I (n E0E••••.T o .RISER • ER E• Co PfSmw POE/Q •_`I / 1 • (n AGM.tax• - i 1 '/% I (c) • (E)fVET RISER 4 (E)UILLIT POLE • In LAW POLE • (E)EI1EMOR WALL NOUN) NO • (n EECMN my. Z Q — E:.VM ( N K N W• \I / ' s (Emall METER • Z W 0—I V) e co --- O • fn Rau VAULT; ! _• Z(n writ.•oul fOC• wt• . I I q '� O ' • (E)GT01 RAH I LLB I V _~V O®� =U/�/ � . t°" % I 0 © v ..�- • \ C . SO at9.M • CONfROa. E ONI N ir, i01,771.:m. gilt OF TIGARD I x Approved 1 (� v Inditionallyµpprove I I C • Far only the work as described in: I pt PE9MIT NO/kUra ,,2k_ -r9er I I I C See Letter to:Follow I ( I I �[`=fin N� I Attach- .- _ I I I •a Job Add ss-/L(7/_� AO.1 Pr Date: 'A4------ .09 ,.. PLAN Robinson Family Trust MMD2009-00(,_ By E Lee &Evelyn L Robinson TRS SOURCE ACADEMY EXH I B IT(. PO Box 91305 Portland, OR 97291 ODA Kourtney Strong 4445 SW Barbur Blvd.,#200 Portland, OR 97239 Robinson Family Trust 21360 NW Amberwood Drive I-illsboro, OR 97124 1S135BC01100 ROBINSON FAMILY TRUST BY E LEE&EVELYN L ROBINSON TRS PO BOX 91305 PORTLAND,OR 97291 OA 49 10/204/ ‘1151 it-0 aid/ APPLICANT MATERIALS ._ RECE/VED si ill : City of Tigard JUL 1 3 2049 Minor Modification - Type LLL, lin, �NGI,NE ERIN G GENERAL INFORMATION In addition, the Director must find that the proposed change is in compliance with all applicable requirements of Property Address/Location(s): Title 18 of the Tigard Development Code. To complete Ill D \ '5 VJ (-Y.ee1(\ Db' R' this review, the Applicant's proposal must include a Tax Map&Tax Lot#(s): discussion indicating how the site expansion/change will 1 S i 5c-)13( - ` ` C 0 continue to comply with the maximum setback, building Site Size: 9 .7 S a( y'e c height, parking, and landscaping standards. Other requirements of this title such as clear vision, solid waste Applicant'-: C I TDA `yvL storage, non-conforming situations, signs, and tree Address: T/L/ , )1*J v IOU,' i3/vd ZOO removal may also be applicable depending on the type and City/State:-PS Zip: 'T7 ' location of the proposed modifications. Primary Contact: •I A _ , Ai_ V 0 0 11A____, 0 1 Phone:503.22 e. 12$fax: 5C)5._2.7 CD • I Le7D 6 E-Mail: 1,nkup@Cidc,6nc• (onA 1 Ouv-Iii- 6 Cr4 1'AC. -. • Property Owner/Deed Holder(sr: REQUIRED SUBMITTAL ELEMENTS (Attach list if more than one) U r l 1 - 1(0 S� (Applications will not be accepted without the t I I r X531 following required submittal elements) Address:2 Nkic).1•J,J_4w,t rLthA DtPhone:5D3.62145. City/State: \1,1 2:2(.0_) b g_ Zip: Ct. 71 Z"f [a Application Form ar Owner's Signature/Written Authorization When the owner and the applicant are different people, the [j' Title Transfer Instrument or Deed applicant must be the purchaser of record or a lessee in Er Site Plan(3 Large Plans &One- Reduced to 8'/2"x 11") possession with written authorization from the owner or an Applicant's Statement/Narrative(3 copies) agent of the owner. The owner(s) must sign this application in the space provided on the back of this form or submit a ©` Filing Fee $-5700 written authonzation with this application.R, Minor Modifications: Minor Modifications are processed for permitted uses and conditional uses. To review a modification as a Minor Modification, the Director must first find that the expansion or change does not invoke one or more of the criteria FOR STAFF USE ONLY discussed within Section 18.360.050(B) - Site Development Review or Section 18.330.020(B)(2) - Conditional Use. If the // p ?frog-modification exceeds the maximum allowed under any one or Case No.()s : /"� more of the criteria, a Major Modification review is required. Major Modifications are processed in the same manner as a Other Case No.(s): new Site Development Review or Conditional Use Permit. .��{3� Receipt No.: Applicant's Statement: Date: 1 ti 309 The applicant's statement must include a summary of the proposed changes. Criteria in either 18.360.050(B) or Application Accepted By S 18.330.020(B)(2) must be addressed with a detailed response Date Determined Complete: 9///Ay- to each criterion. Failure to provide the information needed Revised: 14-Nov-08 to process the application would be reason to consider an ''\""p�\O «fie appLcauons\minor modification app.docx application incomplete and delay review of the proposal. City of Tigard 1 13125 SW Hall Blvd.,Tigard,OR 97223 I 503-639-4171 I www.tigard-or.gov I Page 1 of 2 To consider an application complete,you will need to submit ALL of the REQUIRED SUBMITTAL EL! MENTS as alescribed on the front of this ap slacauon in the "Required Submittal Elements" box. j tDetailed Submittal Requirement Infonnatiun sheets can be obtained,upon request,f‘.»r all types of land list,. Applications.) THE APPLICANT(S) SHALL CERTIFY Ti LAC: • T.itt,bore requesi does not s-iolatt Ally deed restrictions that he attached t000r imposed upon the_subject p•pperty. • If the application is granted.the applicant will exercise the nghts granted in accordance with the terms and subject to all the conditions and limitations of the approval. • All of Inc above statements and the statement-s in the site plan, attachnk•nts,and exhibits transmitted herewith,are true; and the applicartts so acknt.,wiedge that any permit issued.based on this application.and uit■ be revoked if it is found that any such statements are false. . The applicant has read the entire contents of the application, including the policies and criteria, and understands the r'egtu.R ntents for approving or denying the application. SIGNATURES of e;c!owner of the subject property. DA-IED tilL day of 64 0.°. eawkfr. , _..._.........._..._ t\,,,t r'ti t.ttt i, owners Signature c hr ncr's Signature t lie e s Signature Owner's Signature Owner's Signature of'I iga:d 13125 Sl1'1 i all }31i #.,.l'igar,i,OR 97223 503-639.4171 j www.tigard-or.gov 1 Page 2 of 2 L CITY OF TIGARD RECEIPT a g 13125 SW Hall Blvd.,Tigard OR 97223 503.639.4171 TIGARD Receipt Number: 174329 - 07/13/2009 CASE NO. FEE DESCRIPTION REVENUE ACCOUNT NUMBER PAID MMD2009-00021 Minor Modification to an Approved Plan 1003100-43116 $504.00 MMD2009-00021 Minor Modification to an Approved Plan- 1003100-43117 $75.00 LRP Total: $579.00 PAYMENT METHOD CHECK# CC AUTH.CODE ACCT ID CASHIER ID RECEIPT DATE RECEIPT AMT Check 1038433 STREAT 07/13/2009 $579.00 Payor: Robinson Construction Co Total Payments: $579.00 Balance Due: $0.00 Page 1 of 1 RECEIVED 4445 SW BARBUR BLVD.,SUITE 200 PORTLAND,OREGON 97239 AUG 1 1 2009 TEL:503.226.1285 FAX:503.226.1670 E-MAIL:info @cidainc.com CITY OF TIGARD TRANSMITTAL PLANNING/ENGINEERING Project No: 090070.01 Date: August 11, 2009 Project Name: Greenburg Rd Remodel Attn: Hap Watkins Company: City of Tigard Community Development Dept Address: 13125 SW Hall Blvd Tigard, OR 97223 Enclosed: ®Plans ❑Specifications I 'Copy of letter ❑Details ['Shop Drawings ❑Calculations Sketches ❑Other: No. Of Copies Description 1 COPY OF PROPOSED TREE FACT SHEETS 1 REDUCED SIZED SITE PLAN A0.1 DATED 08.10.09 CITY COMMENTS 3 FULL SIZED SITE PLAN A0.1 DATED 08.10.09 CITY COMMENTS 3 FULL SIZED LANDSCAPE PLAN L1.1 DATED 08.10.09 CITY COMMENTS ❑For your Use ❑For Review I (Returned For Approval ❑As Requested ❑Other: Comments: Copies To: File Deliver: ❑ 90 Min 3 HR ❑8 HR 'ck Up Mail ['Next Day Signed: V 1/'- ARCHITECTURE ♦ ENGINEERING ♦ PLANNING ♦ INTERIORS ♦ LANDSCAPE City of Tigard, Oregon - 13125 SW Hall Blvd. • Tiga,u, OR 97223 IIIIIII U1 July 23, 2009 • - . T I GARD CIDA, Inc Kourtney Strong 4445 SW Barbur Blvd., Ste. 200 Portland, OR 97239 RE: 11101 SW Greenburg Rd. Minor Modification (MMD2009-00021) Dear Ms. Strong, I have performed a preliminary review of your application for minor modification of the property at 11101 SW Greenburg Road and I find that the plans are substantively incomplete. I have not received a response from Development Engineering review at this time, but I wanted to give you an early response with the issues I have. First, I need to have all the property lines marked accurately on the site plan by survey. There appears to be an issue with the location of the railroad right-of-way,which I have to compare with your parking plan, and the property boundaries are unclear along both streets. Then I would like you to check the spacing of the street trees on your landscape plan. I couldn't find the mature canopy size of the trees you chose, so I can't say what spacing is correct. Please refer to 18.745.020 of the Tigard Municipal Code regarding street trees and space your plantings accordingly. The buffering on the site is existing, and generally in conformance as it is, so no changes to that aspect of your landscaping plan is requested. Screening is not required, other than refuse container areas. If you have questions, call me direct at 503-718-2440. S. ;erely, I l JI,'�) � '' Darrel"Hap"Watkins Assistant Planner CC: Land Use File MMD2009-00021 MMD2009-00021 CIDA&Robinson Incomplete 072309 Page 1 Phone: 503.639.4171 • Fax: 503.684.7297 • www.tigard-or.gov • TTY Relay: 503.684.2772 ''''''.;\.....11'1. \ f71-0795 10100 . .. ,. ' '... \\ ; ' 101.0 11046 111)4. • • 11150 HMS 11131 11125 11150 11150 "2" i I • 11150 11200 .-• 0211211$ -112•8 , 11141 11150 111.0 [11200 ■44. 11150 • AO'r' 11200 •. 11200 : \, 4,4 19130 'rl.(1\-S . N 1 ' !.1 1:1212:21702741111:112116-1:.--)12111°1:25111151:. '''' ■ ....._1 , ell ii,-. .___ \V\ | Land Use Application COMPLETENESS REVIEW REQUEST TIGARD To: Kim McMillan Return to: Hap Watkins Date Sent: 7/13/09 Date Due: 7/17/09 Project Name: Robinson Property Case No.: MMD2009-00021 Project Address: 11101 SW Greenburg Brief description of the project: Minor Mod for repair of east driveway entrance and landscaping. fr/A sc -41450 otetice /40. 44 ael069940%( -i' si-dt714, 44/4.#41"4'tL low wid 0 %x!1h U) Complete? �J Yes ❑ No Comments below\or ❑ See Attached is\curpin\masters\completeness review request.docx STATE OF OREGON SS my of Washington } I, Jerry, .:• e of Assess- ment and ./.r�'." •• e' o County Clerk for •74.4 � �. -rtify that the with'r�T.,;.5 k n \- eceived and re rq aF tl-tip. x �11, r '• \a f said county 'J : ��'� `-,- .,s : lam' l_\ c. " 5a�w 0 7`r *- ,` **.; 0/Arector of • axation,Ex- 0 44. .....1,x.., lerk ., Doc : 2000095998 Rect: 267810 42.00 11/30/2000 12:43: 17pm ✓.;�iyy s;_a„ ':A a A4.i. • ';is 5.. OF OREGON -LIMY Washington ss After recording return to: ►, Jerry g ! of Assess- ment and ion and Ei=" i�jo County Clerk for said cc�einty, do hereb "-rtify that the within ir�stru,. • �� John E. McCormick and r � �f venting -• eceived f' Sussman Shank Wapnick Caplan & county ; '' °f rec.* �.f Baia Stiles LLP Suite 1400 y * `` ° ' �i/� / 1000 S.W. Broadway `�ti� * ,•` ,' Portland, OR 97205-3089 `" °�'�; -i exata{, Eof y ®. a Clerk Doc : 2000027466 6 Until a change is requested, all tax Rect: 252216 32. o0 11 statements shall be sent to: 04/05/2000 03:28:20pm E. Lee and Evelyn L. Robinson 15375 N.W. West Union Road Portland, OR 97229-2224 WARRANTY DEED E. Lee Robinson and Evelyn L. Robinson, Grantors, convey and warrant to E. Lee Robinson and Evelyn L. Robinson, Trustes u/a dated February 18, 2000, the Robinson Family Trust, Grantees, the real property described on Exhibit A attached hereto. The liability and obligations of the Grantor to Grantees and Grantees' heirs and assigns under the warranties and covenants contained herein or provided by law shall be limited to the amount, nature, and terms of any right or indemnification available to Grantor under any title insurance policy, and Grantor shall have no liability or obligation except to the extent that reimbursement for such liability or obligation is available to Grantor under any such title insurance policy. The said property is free of encumbrances except those of record, if any. The true and actual consideration for this transfer is estate planning. THIS INSTRUMENT WILL NOT ALLOW USE OF THE PROPERTY DESCRIBED IN THIS INSTRUMENT IN VIOLATION OF APPLICABLE LAND USE LAWS AND REGULATIONS. BEFORE SIGNING OR ACCEPTING THIS INSTRUMENT, THE PERSON ACQUIRING FEE TITLE TO THE PROPERTY SHOULD CHECK WITH THE APPROPRIATE CITY OR COUNTY PLANNING DEPARTMENT TO VERIFY APPROVED USES AND TO DETERMINE ANY LIMITS ON LAWSUITS AGAINST FARMING OR FOREST PRACTICES AS DEFINED IN ORS 30.930. This Warranty Deed is being re-recorded to correct the previously recorded Warranty Deed, Document 2000027466. The attached Exhibit A now reflects the correct description of the properties that were left off the previously recorded Warranty Deed. PAGE 1 - WARRANTY DEED ? a /-. J DATED this t81 day of CcilL , 2000. GRANTORS: i - 4 .LEE ROBINSO g EVELYN�L. ROBINSON STATE OF OREGON ) ss. County of Multnomah ) This instrument was acknowledged before me on, _ ► ^` 1 2000 - -by E. Lee Robinson. ;'1 �a + OFFICIAL SEAL (� /J,n 6 l A MURA A BROWN ( / \714,(,11:"{(.Lr/ NOTARY PUBLIC-OREGON 4s. COMMISSION NO 318187 f Notary Public1or Oregon MY COMMISSION EXPIRES DEC 10; 2002 My commission expires: _� ! I I (i * k5�` 11t,�y11�111111T i STATE OF OREGON ) ss. County of Multnomah ) This instrument was acknowledged before me .• . A , , 2000 by Evelyn L. Robinson. 1' f t- OFFICIAL SEAL k. 1. ,l c LA MURA A BROWN Notary Publi for Oregon r� 1/i NOTARY PUBLIC-OREGON My commission expires: / . ! i L- )P-' rpi. COMkAI$SICN NO 318187 � PdY COMMISSION EXPIRES DEC 10, 2002 J F:1C LIENTS1145771DEED3.D05F PAGE 2 - WARRANTY DEED EXHIBIT A A tract of land in Section 35, Township 1 South, Range 1 West of the Willamette Meridian, Washington County, Oregon, more particularly described as follows: Beginning at an iron pipe at the Soutwest corner of the David C. Graham Donation Land Claim No. 52; thence North 89°59'48" East 110.62 feet to a point; thence North 18°43'27" West 21.12 feet to an iron pipe; thence North 89°59'48" East along the North line of S.W. North Dakota Street, 155.26 feet to an iron pipe marking the true point of beginning of the herein described property; thence North 00°16'06" East 247.51 feet to an iron pipe; thence North 82°15'23" East 177.88 feet to an iron pipe on the West line of S.W. Greenburg Road; thence on a curve to the right along the West line of S.W. Greenburg Road, a distance of 107.62 feet (the chord bears South 8°15'49" East 107.53 feet) to an iron pipe; thence South 17' 28' East along the West line of S.W. Greenburg Road, 52.37 feet to an iron pipe at the intersection of the West line of S.W. Greenburg Road and the Northerly line of the abandoned Oregon-Electric Railroad right of way; thence South 51°37'43" West along the Northerly line of said right of way, 188.29 feet to an iron pipe on the North line of S.W. North Dakota Street; thence South 89°59'48" West along the North line of S.W. North Dakota Street, 70.32 feet to the true point of beginning. SUBJECT TO: Statutory powers and assessments of Unified Sewerage Agency, Metzger Sanitary District. Rights to the public in and to any portion of the described premises lying within the boundaries of roads or highways. Sewer easements of record. A tract of land in Section 35, Township 1 South, Range 1 West of the Willamette Meridian, Washington County, Oregon, more particularly described as follows: Beginning at an iron pipe at the Southwest corner of the David C. Graham Donation Land Claim No. 52; thence North 89° 59' 48" East 110.62 feet to a point; thence North 18° 43' 27" West 21.12 feet to an iron pipe marking the true point of beginning of the herein described property, said iron pipe being at the intersection of the Northerly line of S.W. North Dakota Street and the Easterly line of a 12-foot roadway described as Parcel 2 in deed to Jerome S. Bischoff et al, recorded June 9, 1965 in Film Book 559, page 59; thence Northerly along said 12-foot roadway the following courses and distances: North 18° 43' 27" West 56.24 feet to an iron pipe, South 71° 16' 33" West 35.0 feet to an iron pipe, North 18° 43' 27" West 106.0 feet to an iron pipe, North 71° 16' 33" East 35.0 feet to an iron pipe, North 18° 43' 27" West 388.25 feet to an iron pipe at the Southwest corner of that tract described as Parcel I in said deed recorded in Book 559, page 59; thence South 89° 31' 46" East along the South line of said Bischoff tract, 334.41 feet to an iron pipe on the Westerly line of that tract described in deed to Robert Dick et ux, recorded March 12, 1968 in Book 684, page 639; thence South 00° 16' 06" West 25.13 feet to the Southwest corner of said Dick tract; thence North 73° 15' 33" East along the South line of said Dick tract, 180.51 feet to a point on the West line of S.W. Greenburg Road; thence on a curve to the right, along the West line of S.W. Greenburg Road, a distance of 142.38 feet (the long chord bears South 10° 49' 52" West 142.17 feet) to an iron pipe; thence South 89° 38' 34" East 7.0 feet to an iron pipe; thence on a curve to the right along the West line of S.W. Greenburg Road, a distance of 124.51 feet (the long chord bears South 9° 33' 37" East 124.37 feet) to an iron pipe; thence South 82° 15' 23" West 177.88 feet to an iron pipe; thence South 00° 16' 06" West 247.51 feet to an iron pipe on the North line of S.W. North Dakota Street; thence South 89° 59' 48" West along said North line, 155.26 feet to the true point of beginning. Subject to: Statutory powers and assessments of Unified Sewerage Agency, Rights of the public in and to any portion lying within the boundaries of roads and highways and Sewer Easements of record. Except for any liens or encumbrances suffered or created by the contract purchasers subsequent to the Contract of Sale dated August 30, 1972, recorded August 31 , 1972 in Book 885, page 591, Washington County Records. A tract of land in Section 35, Township 1 South, Range 1 West of the Willamette Meridian, Washington County, Oregon, described as follows: Beginning at a point in the Easterly line of the Southern Pacific Railroad, said point being South 88° 16' East 61.03 feet and North 20° 21' West 21.12 feet from the Southwest corner of the D.C. Graham Donation Lane Claim No. 52; thence North 20° 21' West 89.58 feet; thence North 13° 53' East 61.50 feet; thence North 20° 21' West 288.38 feet; thence North 88° 50' East 12.71 feet; thence South 20° 21' East 288.02 feet; thence South 13° 53' West 61.50 feet; thence South 20° 21' East 90.51 feet to a point in the North line of S.W. Dakota Street; thence along said North line 12.95 feet to the point of beginning. Except subject to restrictions and encumbrances of record. F:ICLIENTS1145771EXHIBITA01.DOC • --� 07/14/2009 14:41 5032261670 CIDA PAGE 02/04 4445 SW BARBUR BLVD., SUITE 200 PORTLAND, OREGON 97239 TEL: 503.226.1285 FAX: 503.226.1 670 E-MAIL: info @cidainc,COm www.cidainc.corn REVISION July 14,2009 City of Tigard • Community Development Department Attn: Hap Watkins 13125 SW Hall Boulevard Tigard, OR 97223 RE: Greenburg Rd Remodel CIDA Project Number 090070.01 Dear Mr.Watkins: The purpose for the minor modification application is primarily to remodel the existing building and bring it building up to energy code compliance, by replacing the existing overhead doors, storefront entries and re- roofing with new insulation and secondly to apply for a change of use from general retail to indoor enter'ta'inment for the 14,750 sf tenant in the central portion of the building. In conjunction with these repairs the owner would like to take this opportunity to aesthetically upgrade the facade, as the building has deteriorated over the years. Having the building repaired and operational for future tenants and completing the exterior upgrades will benefit the neighborhood as a whole. The existing building is located at 1 1 101 SW Greenburg Road in Tigard, Oregon and is approximately 69,017 square feet. The scope of this project includes exterior remodeling and site improvements only, no new square footage will be added to the existing building. To process this project under a Minor Development Review,we can confirm that we do not exceed the limits set below. (Excerpt from Tigard Development Code section 18.360.050) 1 8.360.050 Major Modification(s) to Approved Plans or Existing Development S. Evaluation criteria. The Director shall determine that a major modi fication(s)will result if one or more of the following changes are proposed. There will be: 1.An increase in dwelling unit density, or lot coverage for residential development; This project is nat a residential development 2.A change in the ratio or number of different types of dwelling units; This project is not a residential development 3.A change that requires additional on-site parking in accordance with Chapter 18.765; ARCI-11 TI_- C I URE • ENGihNFI_ RING • PLANNING • INTERIORS • LANDSCAPE ' 07/14/2009 14:41 5032261670 CIDA PAGE 03/04 There are currently 77 parking spaces required for the existing 69,017 SF mixed use retail and warehouse building. Per current code standards, the existing building, remodeled requires a minimum of 120 parking spaces total, New spaces will be provided within existing impervious areas, See the table below for the calculations: Type Requirements Calculations Warehouse 0.5/1,000 SF min. 39,425/1,000 x 0.5 = 1 9.71 min. <150,000 SF 0.8/1,000 SF max. 39,425/1,000 x 0.8 = 31.54 max. (existing) Sales-Oriented Retail 3.7/1,000 SF min. 14,842/1,000 x 3.7= 54.92 min. (existing) 5.1/1.000 SF max. 14,842/1,000 x 5.1 = 75.69 max. Indoor Entertainment 4.3/1,000 SF min. 14,750/1,000 x 4.3 - 63.43 min. (new) 5.4/1,000 SF max. 14,750/1,000 x 5.4 = 79.65 max. , Total 138,06 min 186.88 max Mixed-Use 100%of 19.71 19.71 Reduction 90%of 54.92 49.42 80%of 63.43 50.74 Total I20 spaces 4. A change in the type of commercial or industrial structures as defined by the international Building code; A change in type as defined by the IBC is not required for this project 5. An increase in the height of the building(s) by more than 20%; There is no change to the existing building height proposed. 6. A change in the type and location of access ways and parking areas where off-site traffic would be affected; Access ways and parking areas will not be affected. 7. An increase in vehicular traffic to and from the site and the increase can be expected to exceed 100 vehicles per day: Per ITE Trip Generation 6`h edition, the new indoor entertainment tenant would be best classified as 493 Heath Club. The average Trip generation per 1,000 gross square feet floor area is 0.30 weekday a.m.peak and 4.30 weekday p.m. peak. Based on that tenant there would be 14,750/1,000 x 0,30 = 4,43 additional trips per weekday am. peak and 14750/1,000 x 4.30 = 63.43 additional trips per weekday p.m. peak. Therefore,this project will not increase to or exceed 100 additional vehicle trips per day. 8. An increase in the floor area proposed for a nonresidential use by more than 10%excluding expansions under 5,000 square feet; There is no floor area expansion proposed to the existing building. 9.A reduction in the area reserved for common open space andlor usable open space which reduces the open space area below the minimum required by this code or reduces the open space area by more than 10%; ' 07/14/2009 14:41 5032261670 CIDA PAGE 04/04 Common open space is not a requirement for the MUC zoning district therefore this criteria does not apply. J 0.A reduction of project amenities below the minimum established by this code or by more than 10% where specified in the site plan: a. Recreational facilities; There are no existing recreational facilities on this site. b. Screening; andlor The required onsite screening will not be reduced. c. Landscaping provisions. The landscape to site area percentage will increase from 12%to 13%. H..A modification to the conditions imposed at the time of site development, review approval which are not the subject o f$i through 10 above of this subsection. There is a pre-existing, non-conforming continuously maintained retail sales/warehouse use in the existing building. These occupancies will continue with the repairs to the existing building. The existing use was established prior to the adoption of the current code and legally falls within the nonconforming use section 1 8.760.The new tenant will be classified as indoor entertainment and is allowed in the Mixed-Use Commercial District Zone. This project does not exceed the limits set above;therefore our project can be processed under a Type I Minor Development Review. If you have any questions please feel free to contact me at 503-226-1285. Sincerel,,--� K . Kourtney Strong Project Manager t) c. Randy Robinson, Robinson Construction Kim Walmer, CIDA; file Fact Sheet ST-269 fopESTSERv,,._ SouteeraGroup 1 November 1993 U4S ....-...mr 1 I. 4 ~1 ACMCNIOFl6R1� of State Foresters BEC ED 11".11V AU G 1 1 2009 Fraxinus pennsylvanica 'Summit' T1GRD `Summit' Green Ash 1 CITY 4F�,.7., � CRIfvG Edward F. Gilman and Dennis G. Watson2 INTRODUCTION i `Summit' Green Ash grows into a pyramidal form f. .�• a when young, maturing to a rather.open, oval silhouette •` v vvio 55 feet tall by 50 feet wide (Fig. '1)'. Once developed properly in the nursery, the trunk remains straight up •'• , �' ��� r' through the crown of the tree and the branch habit is .t OA''' . . ,`W1 reported to be better than the species. Early pruning 'A z helps assure that this happens. The trees grow quickly 4� �� w ^ and can sometimes reach 80 feet in height. Green to r `. reddish-purple flowers appear in spring but do not t • 4 Its r'� • produce fruit since the plant is supposedly a male. V. r But some horticulturists believe that there are female il�^ �; trees mixed with the population. If the tree truly is a ;- t �t �''. r+ �t�, male, this could make this a superior replacement for ,4`"'"`+ r,T •t f'•'.r the once very popular `Marshall Seedless' which has { `�-'* 7,1. .' some female trees mixed with the population and now .�, ' ' i►%v ";r •some trees are fruiting. `Marshall Seedless' is also I '� ` ' reportedly susceptible to storm damage, although some r • of this could be due to improper or no pruning. Unlike other Green Ashes which have unpredictable fall color, `Summit' displays foliage of an intense golden-yellow. The attractive bark is red-tinged and furrowed and reportedly thicker than other Ashes. Figure 1. Middle-aged 'Summit' Green Ash. GENERAL INFORMATION Scientific name: Fraxinus pennsylvanica `Summit' for buffer strips around parking lots or for median strip Pronunciation: FRACK-sih-nus pen-sill-VAN-ih-kuh plantings in the highway; reclamation plant; shade Common name(s): `Summit' Green Ash tree; sidewalk cutout (tree pit); residential street tree; Family: Oleaceae tree has been successfully grown in urban areas where USDA hardiness zones: 3B through 8 (Fig. 2) air pollution, poor drainage, compacted soil, and/or Origin: native to North America drought are common Uses: large parking lot islands (> 200 square feet in size); wide tree lawns (>6 feet wide); recommended 1. This document is adapted from Fact Sheet ST-269,a series of the Environmental Horticulture Department,Florida Cooperative Extension Service, Institute of Food and Agricultural Sciences,University of Florida. Publication date:November 1993. 2. Edward F.Gilman,associate professor,Environmental Horticulture Department;Dennis G.Watson,associate professor,Agricultural Engineering Department,Cooperative Extension Service,Institute of Food and Agricultural Sciences,University of Florida,Gainesville FL 32611. Fraxinus pennsylvanica 'Summit Summit' Green Ash Page 2 ?IV %1111 tailXovralIlrAtlr Figure 2. Shaded area represents potential planting range. Availability: generally available in many areas within Fall characteristic: showy its hardiness range Flower DESCRIPTION Flower color: green Height: 55 to 60 feet Flower characteristics: inconspicuous and not Spread: 50 to 60 feet showy; spring flowering Crown uniformity: symmetrical canopy with a regular (or smooth) outline, and individuals have more Fruit or less identical crown forms Crown shape: oval; pyramidal; upright Fruit shape: elongated Crown density: moderate Fruit length: 1 to 3 inches Growth rate: fast Fruit covering: dry or hard Texture: medium Fruit color: tan Fruit characteristics: attracts birds; fruit, twigs, or Foliage foliage cause significant litter; persistent on the tree; showy Leaf arrangement: opposite/subopposite (Fig. 3) Leaf type: odd pinnately compound Trunk and Branches Leaflet margin: crenate; entire; serrate Leaflet shape: lanceolate; ovate Trunk/bark/branches: grow mostly upright and will Leaflet venation: pinnate not droop; not particularly showy; should be grown Leaf type and persistence: deciduous with a single leader; no thorns Leaflet blade length: 2 to 4 inches Pruning requirement: requires pruning to develop Leaf color: green strong structure Fall color: yellow Breakage: resistant Fact Sheet ST-44 foRE5T SERvict so�ttero�- November 1993 iu4s in liff ROFA6R>< of State Foresters ECp�1f'itD AUG 1 1 /009 Acer rubrum `Bowhall' �TYQFTIGARD `Bowhall' Red Maple' A� NGINEERING Edward F. Gilman and Dennis G. Watson2 INTRODUCTION This cultivar of Red Maple is somewhat pyramidal, but is probably best described as broadly _ ' . )1.,•'• columnar in shape (Fig. 1). It is a moderate grower, f `�= %•' • = Acer rubrum 'Bowhall' -- 'Bowhk ed Maple Page 2 ° , 1 I 41110 1V0,1, 1)115 Nr- 441Prk Figure 2. Shaded area represents potential planting range. DESCRIPTION Flower Height: 45 to 50 feet Flower color: red Spread: 18 to 25 feet Flower characteristics: showy; spring flowering; Crown uniformity: symmetrical canopy with a winter flowering regular (or smooth) outline, and individuals have more or less identical crown forms Fruit Crown shape: upright Crown density: dense Fruit shape: elongated Growth rate: fast Fruit length: 1 to 3 inches Texture: medium Fruit covering: dry or hard Fruit color: red Foliage Fruit characteristics: attracts birds; attracts squirrels and other mammals; no significant litter problem; Leaf arrangement: opposite/subopposite (Fig. 3) showy Leaf type: simple Leaf margin: lobed; incised; serrate Trunk and Branches Leaf shape: ovate Leaf venation: palmate Trunk/bark/branches: bark is thin and easily Leaf type and persistence: deciduous damaged from mechanical impact; grow mostly upright Leaf blade length: 2 to 4 inches and will not droop; not particularly showy; should be Leaf color: green grown with a single leader; no thorns Fall color: orange; red; yellow Pruning requirement: requires pruning to develop Fall characteristic: showy strong structure Breakage: susceptible to breakage either at the crotch due to poor collar formation, or the wood itself is 41 �\ -. \ KEYNOTES A :F61 \ ••.. O (N) 10'-0" x 20'-0 CMU TRASH ENCLOSURE - SEE •-.......... / DETAIL 10/52.1 `o;; • / O (N) 10'-0•X 10'-0•CMU TRASH ENCLOSURE - SEE _���. \ DETAIL 10/52.1 ` o Ro:: I / O3 (N) EXTRUDED CURB L - / O4 DEMO AREA OF (E)ASPHALT 9 Dm 0 _. -------- -- ---- -- --- ----- _ O (N) MONUMENT SIGN - TBD j„Roo_____________ ____________ _______ __________________ ____ _----= _�=— -- / O (N) CONCRETE WALKWAY n°:«a.. -�--� �// � - - / RELOCATE ALL (E ELECTRIC METERS TO INDICATED AREA W / - - j O COORDINATE WITH SUBCONTRACTOR L / O RC NATE WRH)SUBCONTRACTOR INDICATED AREA - (r. • / O (N) STEEL PIPE BOLLARD - SEE DETAIL 8/A3.1 Z %h`� ; • 1 / ��/` / 0 (N) EXTERIOR METAL STARS - SEE DETAILS 4/A3.1. 5/A3.1 & 6/A3.1 I 0 %/, / / 1 (E) ASPHALT SPEED BUMP • i .,, • ( / 12 REMOVE (E) BOLLARDS ONCE UTILRIES HAVE BEEN / O RELOCATED • • 7L/ .,. / / 13 (N) STRIPED ADA WALKWAY C7 � • O Af / // LEGEND Z Z -�--�_ O ,� 1/ / G (E) ROOF DRAIN =� I mn/ 0 O o ! .. 0 - oa (E)GAS VALVE z ? • `•�� - 1 / / ■ (E)GAS METER $' / / J m (E)COMMUNICATION MANHOLE o ' / ■ (E) COMMUNICATION RISER I ow �`I 1 � / / ¢ (E) PEDESTRIAN POLE / • (E) SIGNAL BOX ' EXISTING RETAIL TENANT W' I • (E) BOLLARD I CC FUTURE WAREHOUSE .TENANT(S) ENT • 4• 7 / • (E) POWER RISER Q (THE.S CE ACADE]IY _~ - - / I 1X (E) UTILITY POLE & SHOCK) 1r Aso 5F /I ” i I R. (E) LIGHT POLE P.. Z CE p •• •, , I m (E)EXTERIOR WALL MOUNT LIGHT l/R■) I V M / O 1 I (E) ELECTRICAL PANEL v I/ / 1 I D CC N CNII W / / .. • O � (E) POWER METER p N. / I I ® a o W I I (E)TRANSFORMER M Z Z • y Y 0 1 I I I • (E) POWER VAULT W W O • O tMIFE AET*TENANT / 0 I co i I C] (E) WATER VAULT C7 Ur ce �Si._ I / - ��' O �� I 0 (E)WALL MOUNT FDC N O Z ,` I_ I ■ (E) CATCH BASIN 6 L`'© V O ® ® '.%;. ©e//y/////,gr,/_� ��1.� . • .• e O Y I I I 0 BENCHMARK O W '� _'+' ® FOUND SURVEY MONUMENT • \ I I Q ® ! I A SURVEY CONTROL POINT ~ %6 / / O 0 d"'.°s ////%�, I DRAWN BY:KLS 0 \ \ \I I ©���%� 7��� / I ` 4""3'� I i CHECKED BY: KLW W II eD-gi I 1712 v ID / L` ` / I I/ / I DAYD&7T1SH �� 19 . I I I / I i I �, ranlAlo,cc F / - I�� ISSUED DATE "-'!,_ �' 1 MINOR MOD 07.13.09 W ■- ...• ' •••••.......... gl - I I 2 BLDG PERMIT 07.30.09 3 CITY COMMENTS 08.10.09 . • CITY OF TIGARD I Approved 1 [ I I I "anditionally Approved I I I - F ar only the work as described in: PE9MIT NOQ(�cj -pads• I i I DRAWING mac See Letter t0. Follow I I 617E&unun Puri i Attach. Il Job Add ss: / �+ A�■� ..r l?y Date: Z+ c SIRE PLAN 1• �,_0• .D■ ND:090070.01