CUP1997-00006 CITY OF TIOARD
Commumty�Devefopmertt
, S�iapingA BrtteTCommunity
CITY OF T16ARD
'GVaskin$ton County, Oregon
NOTICE OF FINAL ORDER c� BY TNE NEARINGS OFFICER
Case Number(s): CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT (CUP� 97-0006
Case Name(s): THE RITE CENTER
Name of Owner: Interfaith Outreach Services
Name of Applicant: (Same as owner�
Address of Applicant: PO Box 230821 City: Tigard State: Oregon Zip: 97281
Address of Property: 11070 8 11130 SW Greenbur�d City: Tigard State: Oreaon Zip: 97223
Tax Map(s) & Lot No(s).:WCTM 1S135CA, Tax Lots 02500 & 02600.
8ennest—> The City of Tigard Hearing's Officer has approved, subject to conditions, a request for
Conditional Use approval to allow the construction of a 36-bed homeless facility.
?�oe: Residential, 12 Units Per Acre; R-12. The R-12 zone allows single-family attached/detached
residential units, multiple-family residential units, residential care facilities, mobile home parks
and subdivision, public support services, family day care, home occupation, temporary use,
residential fuel tank, and accessory structures, among other uses. APPLICABLE BEYIEW CRITERIII•
Community Development Code Chapters 18.54, 18.100, 18.102, 18_106, 18.108, 18.120,
18.130, 18.150 and 18.164. Comprehensive Plan Policies 2.1.1, 4.2.1, 6.1.1, 7.1.2, 7.3.1,
7.4.4, 7.6.1, 8.1.1 and8.1.3.
Actieu: —> O Approval as requested � Approval with conditions ❑ Denial
N�tice: Notice was published in the newspaper, posted at City Hall and mailed to:
0 Owners of record within the required distance 0 Affected governmental agencies
0 The affected Citizen Involvement Team Facilitator D The applicant and owner(s)
Roal Deeisi�� �
T8E DEClSION SRAII BE FIIiAI ON FRIDAT IOLY 25,1991�NLESS AII APPEAL tS FILED.
The adopted findings of fact, decision and statement of conditions can be obtained from
the City of Tigard Planning Division, Tigard City Hall, 13125 SW Hall Boulevard, Tigard,
Oregon 97223.
Apq�el: Any party to the decision may appeal this decision in accordance with 18.32.290 (B) and
Section 18.32.370, which provides that a written appeal may be filed within ten (10) days
after notice is given and sent. The appeal may be submitted on City forms and must be
accompanied by the appeal fee(s) of $1,745.00 plus transcript costs, not in excess of
$500.00.
THE BEA�UIlE FAR RlII16 Of AM APPEAI IS 3:30 PlYI.Oi!JOLT 25,t991. .
laesd�u� lf you have any questions, please call the City of Tigard Planning Division at (503) 639-4171.
CUP 97-0006 THE RITE CENTER NOTICE OF FINAL ORDER BY THE HEARING'S OfFICER
BEFORE THE LAND USE HEARINGS OFFICER
FOR THE CITY OF TIGARD,OREGOI�1
Regarding an application for a conditional use permit ) F I N A L O R D E R
for a 36-bed homeless facility for Interfaith Outreach )
, Services in the R-12 zone at 1107U-11130 SW ) CUP 97-0006
Gc�eenberg Road in the Ciry of Tigard, Oregon ) (The Rite Center)
I. SUMMARY
1. Interfaith Outreach Services (IOS) requests approval of a conditional use pernut
to build and operate a 36-bed homeless shelter on a.72-acre parcel consisting of two lots.
The facility will be built in two phases. In the fust phase, the applicant will remove two
existing homes and will build 10 off-smeet pazking spaces and a 5000-squa�foot, one-
story structure containing 24 beds in 6 rooms, common cooking and dining rooms, a child
development center and accessory activities. In the second phase,the applicant will place a
1500-square foot structure on the site for offices and will build four more off-street parking
spaces and a 2630-square foot addition containing an additional 12 beds in three rooms,
plus a manager's apartrnent and associated common features. As amended, the pmposed
development will comply with all applicable dimensional standards of the R-12 zone.
2. At the public hearing in this matter,City staff recommended conditional
approval. The applicant accepted the rccommended conditions and responded to public
testimony. One neighbor testified against the condidonal use permit,citing concerns about
land use compatibility,safety and the propriety of this use in a residendal zone.
3. In this final order,the hearings officer approves the conditional use permit based
on the findings and conclusions included and incorporated herein and subject to conditions
recommended by City staff except as expressly provided otherwise in this fmal order.
II. BASIC FACTS INCORPORATED BY REFERENCE
The hearings officer incorporates by reference the findings about the site and surroundings
in Section III of the Staff Report dated June 27, 1997 (the Staff Report), and the staff and
agency comments in Section V of the Staff Report.
III. APPLICABLE APPROVAL STANDARDS
The applicable approval stand.ards are identified in Secdon N of the Staff Report.
IV. HEARING AND RECORD
1. Hearings Officer Larry Epstein (the "hearings officer")received testimony at the
public hearing about this applicaaon on July 7, 1997. A record of that tescimony is
included herein as Exhibit A (Parties of Record),Eathibit B (Taped Proceedings), and
Exhibit C (Written Testimony). These eachibits are filed at the Tigard Ciry Hall. The
hearings officer described how the hearing would be conducted, and made the
announcements and disclosures required by law, including a disclosure that the hearings
officer visited the site of the proposed facility before the hearing. The following fmdings
summarize selected testimony offered at the hearing.
2. City planner Will D'Andrea summarized the project and the Staff Report.
Nearings O„Q`'rcer Fina!Orde�
CUP 97-a006(T1u Riu Center) Page 1
3. Kim Brown and Keith Liden testitied for the applicant.
_ a. Ms. Brown accepted the Staff Report and recommended conditions of
approval without objection. She summarized the services IOS will provide at the site and
highlights of management and operations policies for residents and other clients of the
� facility. She summarized IOS's experience operadng a homeless shelter in the city for the
last eight years, based on which she argued the faciliry will not have adverse effects on the
vicinity. She argued the proposed facility has a residenaal character and a relatively small
scale compared to more densely developed two-story apartments and condominiums
abutting the site.
b. Mr. Liden introduced into the record letters from McKeever/Morris, Inc.
to the fire district dated June 23, 1997 and from Architects Van Lom/Edwards, AIA,PC to
Will D'Andrea dated June 25, 1997. He elaborated about the design of the proposed
facility being compatible with the character of the area and responsive to the shape of the
site. He highlighted proposed landscaping and screening,noang proposed trees will be
concentrated on the south side of the site where there are no or fewer such trees than on the
north side.
- 4. Kira Govshtein testified on behalf of herself and her uncle,who own units in
the condominium adjoining the site. She argued the proposed use is commercial in nature
and should be in a commercial zone rather than in a residential zone generally or in what
she characterized as an exclusively residential area in this case. She argued the facility was
incompatible with the adjoining residential uses,because the residents of the faciliry are
homeless. She testified about her belief that most homeless people also are mentally ill,
and that such people pose a hazard to residents of the adjoining condominium. Ms.
Govshtein tsstified she received the Staff Report too late to prepare adequately. She also
asked the hearings officer to summarize his observation during the site visit, which the
hearings off'icer did.
5. Ms. Brown responded to Ms. Govshtein. She highlighted policies under which
IOS operates its existing facility and will operate the proposed facility. Among other
things,residents of the facility have to comply with those policies or they are ejected. If a
person is ejected, she explained IOS staff accompany that person to a bus and give them a
ticket or take other steps to ensure they leave. IOS aLso contacts the police about the
_ ejecrion, and the police monitor the vicinity in response. Similar policies have worked well
at the existing facility in that no neighbor has complained about or reported inappropriate
behavior by facility residents or suspected crimes by those residents. She noted the facility
staff is supported by 250 volunteers. She noted the facility will be largely family-oriented.
The existing facility serves a relatively large number of families with children. She testified
that roughly 30 percent of homeless people are mentally i1L She testified IOS conducted a
screening process before a person is accepted at the facility, and people who are mentally ill
are referred to another facility. The proposed facility will not serve people who are
mentally ill. She noted that the Tigard Community Development Code does not allow the
facility in a commercial zone. It only is allowed in a residennal zone (R-12 and higher).
She summarized past meetings between the condominium associarion board of directors
and the applicant and commitments to maintain contact with the associacion board.
6. At the conclusion of the public portion of the hearing,the heari.ngs officer closed
the public record and announced an intention to approve the conditional use pernut subject
aenerally to the conditions recommended by staff.
Hearings Offtcer Final Order
CUP 97-0006(The Rite Center) 1'a8e 2
V. DISCUSSION
_ 1. The hearings officer concurs in the analysis and conclusions offered by city
staff; to wit, the application shows that the proposal does or can comply with the applicable
standards and critena for a condidonal use pernut, and adoption of recommended
. conditions of approval as amended will ensure final plans are submitted consistent with
those criteria and standards and will prevent,reduce or mitigate potendal adverse impacts of
the development consistent with the requirements of the Tigard Communiry Development
Code ("CDC"). The hearings officer adopts the findings and conclusions in the June 27
Staff Report as his own except as otherwise expressly provided herein.
2. Ms. Govshtein presented the only disputed issues in this case. The following
findings are responsive to her testimony.
a. The propvsed use is permitted in the R-12 zone and is not permitted in
lower density residendal zones or in commercial or industrial zones. CDC 18.54.040.
Therefore it is pr�esumpavely compatible with other uses in the R-12 zone,subject to
conditions and development standards to ensure the use is compatible in fact
b. The hearings officer finds the proposed use will be compadble (although
that is not a standard for the condidonal use permit, per se) as follows.
i. Because its relatively small scale (e.g., one story height), the
proposed suucture will not loom over or physically dominate other structures in the
vicinity. Conditions of approval and site design requirements ensure that lights on the site
will not be directed nor cast significant light onto adjoining properties,signage is
compadble with other signs in the area,etc. The materials,finishes and colors proposed to
be used for the facility are like and are compadble with materiaLs from which other housing
in the area is buil� Proposed landscaping is consistent with the CDC and is selected and
placed to achieve a maximum screening and buffering effect The structure and
surrounding will be visually pleasing when viewed from off-site.
u. Because paridng is isolated on the west side of the site, farthest
from the condominiums, noise, dust and fumes associated with vehicle maneuvering will
have little or no impact on the condominiums.
iu. Because the facility will serve many families and will not serve
mentally ill people,the facility and adjoining condominiums will serve substantially similar
populadons. Although the residents of the facility are homeless, they are not crinunal,
antisocial or otherwise inherently a danger or risk to surrounding residents, particularly
given the scrutiny to which the IOS subjects prospective residents befo� they are accepted
and the policies to which residents of the facility v►nll be subject. Homelessness is not a
measure of a person's respect for the law or rights of others or ability to live in peace and
harmony with neighbors. Although Ms. Govshtein's concerns appeared to be deeply and
sincerely felt by her, they are not based on substantial evidence in the record in this case.
They may be based on her experiences in the former Soviet Union or elsewhere. But, in
the absence of substandal evidence to support them, those concerns are not a basis for
denying or condi�ioning the proposal under the law. Based on the substantial evidence that
the facility has not created problems at its ea�isting location, there is no reasonable basis for
concluding that the facility's residents pose a hazard or risk to residents of the vicinity of
the proposed faciliry.
Hearings O,�"uer Final Orrier
CUP 97-0006(The Rite Center) Page 3
c. The hearings officer hnds the facility complies with the standards for a
conditional use pennit for the reasons given in the Staff Report and the following:
i. The site size and dimensions provide adequate area for the needs
of the proposed use,because the site will contain the requisite number of off-street pazking
, spaces designed consistent with CDC 18.106; landscaping,buffering and screening will
comply with CDC 18.100; and setbacks will comply vv�th the dimensional requirements of
the R-12 zone (CDC 18.54.050).
ii. The characteristics of the site are suitable for the proposed use
considering its size and shape, based on the p�ceding finding. Its location is suitable,
because the site is located in a district in which it is permitted as a conditional use;it is
situated between two other residendal uses and at the edge of the residential area; general
vehicular access to the site is direct from Greenberg Road rather than through a residential
neighborhood; it has ready access to multiple forms of transportation along Greenberg
Road (i.e.,bicycle and bus); and it is situated within the a�a the facility is intended to
serve. The topography of the site is suitable, because it is flat, poses no restrictions on the
design of the site,and does not create unusual potential for drainage impacts. There are
few natural features on the site. However exisnng trees abutting the site have been
considered in the design of the facility.
iii. All r�quir+ed public facilities can serve the proposed use,
including public water,sanitary sewer and drainage facilities,roads, and police, fire and
other emergency services,based on substantial evidence in the record(i.e.,written
statements from the service providers).
iv. The proposal complies with the use and dimensional
requirements of the R1-2 zone, based on preceding findings.
v. The proposal does or will comply with applicable signage
regulations, provided the applicant applies for and receives approval of a sign permit if one
is required or the applicant installs an exempt sign consistent with CDC 18.114.060.
Conditions of approval do not direcdy require such a permit or compliance. The conditions
should be amended to address this issue expressly.
vi. The proposal does or will comply with applicable approval __
standards in CDC 18.120.180,based on the findings in the Staff Report and condition of
approval5.
vii. The proposal complies with the applicable policies of the
comprehensive plan,based on the findings in the Staff Report.
d. Many of the find.ings supporting approval of this application rely on the
applicant to conduct the use substantially as represented in the application and the
applicant's testimony. There is no reason to believe the applicant would vary from those
representadons, but things do change. To ensure the proposed use continues to be
conducted substantially as represented by the applicant in this matter, a condition of
approval is warranted requiring it, subject to changes permitted by law.
3. Ms. Govshtein testified that she did not have enough time to prepare for the
hearing, because she did not tirnely r�eceive the Staff Report. The CDC does not require the
City to send a copy of the staff report to residents of the vicinity. It requires the City to
send notice of the public hearing and to include in that nodce a statement that the staff report
will be available 7 days before the hearing. Such a notice was given in this case,based on
Hearings Off'uer Fina!Order
CUP 97-0006(The Rite Center) pag�4
the nodce and certificadon in the record. The staff�eport in this case was available on or
about June 27, more than seven days before the hearing. Therefore the nodce given in this
case and the publication of the staff report complied with the CDC. Moreover the hearings
officer fmds Ms. Govshtein presented a cogent and articulate argument on behalf of herself
and her uncle. Although she might have benefitted from seeing the report earlier,her
* failure to do so did not substantially impair her ability to participate meaningfully in the
review of the application to the extent that she was denied procedural due process.
VI. STTE VISTT BY HEARINGS OFFICER
The hearings o�cer visited the site and suirounding area and summarized his
observadons at the hearing in this matt�r.
VII. CONCLUSION AND DECISION
1. The hearings officer concludes that the proposed conditional use permit
complies with the applicable criteria and standards of the Community Development Code,
provided development that occurs after this decision complies with applicable local,state,
and federal laws and with conditions of approval warranted to ensure such compliance _
� occurs.
2. In recognition of the findings and conclusions contained herein, and
incorporating the Staff Report and public testimony and eachibits received in this matter, the
hearings officer hereby approves CUP 97-0006 ('The Rite Center),subject to the conditions
of approval in Section II of the City of T'igard Staff Report,with the following changes:
a. Condidon of approvalS.E is hereby added to read as follows:
E. Signs proposed for the site consistent with CDC 18.114 and, if
necessary,a sign permit application.
b. Condition of approval 10 is hereby added to read as follows:
10. The facility shall be operated substandally as�presented in the
application and in the testimony in this matter;provided, the
applicant may propose changes consistent with and subject to the -
applicable requirements of CDC 18.130.
AT'ED 9th day o , 1997.
Larry Epste' ,AI
City of Tig d H ' s Officer
Xearings O,d`'�cerFina!Order
CUP 97-0006(The Rite Centtr) Page S
Agenda Item: 2.3
Hearing Date: Julv 7,1997 Time• 7•00 pM
STAFF REPORT T4 THE
� - HEARING'S OFFICER -
cmr oF now�m
FOR THE CITY OF TIGARD, OREGON �°���
s � �t Beucs c
�ECTION I• APPLICATI�N S��MiueQv
CASES: FILE NAME; � RITF C`FNTFR
Conditional Use Permit (CUP) 97-0006
PROPOSAL: A request for Conditional Use approval to allow the construction of a
36-bed homeless facility.
APPLICANT: Interfaith Outreach Seroices OWNER: Same
PO Box 230821
Tigard, OR 97281
COMPREHENSIVE , . ,.. .
PLAN
DESIGNATION: Medium Density.
ZONING . .. � ._ ..--
�r._._� �: _
DESIGNATION: Residerrtial, 12 Units Per Acre; R-12.�
n
LOCATION: 11070 and 11't�0 SW Greenburg Road; WCTM iS135CA,.Tax Lots
02500 and 02600. Located in the eastem terminus of SW Tiedeman
Street and SW Geenburg Road.
APPLICABLE .
REVIEYV
CRITERIA: Community Development Code Chapters 18.54, 18.100, 18.102,
18•106, 18.108, 18.120, 18.130, 18.150 and 18.164. Comprehensive
Plan Policies 2.1.1, 4.2.1, 6.1.1, 7.1.2, 7.3.1, 7.4.4, 7.6.1, 8.1.1 and
8.1.3.
�ECTION II: STAFF RECOMM NneT�nN
Staff necommends that the Hearings OflScer ftnd that the proposed Conditionat Use wi(I not
adverseiy affed the health, safiety and welfare of the City. Therefore, staff recommends
APPROVAL, subject to the fotlowing recommended conditions of approvat:
STAFF REPORT TO THE HEARING'S pF'F10ER qJp 97,app6- TME RRE C� PAGE t OF 1 S
CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL
PRlOR TO THE ISSUANCE OF THE SITE AND/OR BUILDlNG PERMIT(S), .
THE FOLLOWING CONDtTiONS SHALL BE SATtSFIED:
(Unless otherwise nobed, the staff contact shal! be Brian Rager, 1
_ Engineering Department(503) 639-4171.y ��
1. Prior to issuance of a site and/or building permit, a Street Opening Permit will be
required for this project to cover the sanitary sewer and storm sewer connections in
SW Greenburg Road, plus any other work proposed in the public right-of-way. The
applicant will need to submit five (5) copies of a proposed public improvement plan
for review and approval. NOTE: these plans are in addition to any drawings required
by the Building Division and should only include infonnation relevant to the public
improvements. This permit shall be obtained by the applicant prior to issuance of the
site and/or building permi�
2. As a part of the pubfic impro�ement plan submittal, the Engineerirtg Department shall
be provided with the name, address and telephone number of the individual or
corporate entity who will be responsible for executing the compliance agreement and
providing the financial assurance for the pub(ic improvements.
3. Any proposed services from the City water line shall be shown on the proposed
public improvement construction drawings and shall be reviewed and approved by
the City's Water Department, as a part of the Engineering Departrnent plan review.
4. The applicant shall provide an on-site water quali�ty facil(ty as required by Unfied
Sewerage Agency Resolution and Order No. 91�7. Final plans and calculations
shall be submitted to the Engineering Departrnent for review and approval prior to
issuance of the site and/or building permi� In addfion, a proposed maintenance plan
shall be submitted along with the plans and calculations for review and approval.
5. Revised site and landscaping plans shalt be submitted for review by the Planning
Division, Staff Contac� Will D'Andrea (503-639-4171). The revised plans shall
include the following:
A. landscaping to be incorporated into the berm that will effectively screen the
parking lot from view, and an addfional two (2) parking lot trees to be located
within the landscape islands adjacent to the driveway;
B. minimum driveway width of 24 feet;
C. caliper size of the trees to be removed. If these trees are greater than 12-inch
caliper, the applicant shall provide mitigation in accordance with Section
18.150.025(B)(2); and
D. written sign-off from the hauler regarding the compatibility and location of the
trash enclosure facility. -
STAFF REPORT TO TIiE HEARING'S OFFIC�R CUP 97-0006- TNE RRE CENTER PAGE 2 OF 15
6. Documentation that tax lots 02500 and 026Q0 have been consolidated.
, 7. Pians approved by Tualatin Valley Fire and Rescue (AGENCY CONTACT: Gene
Birchill).
;
THE FOLLOWlNG CONDITIONS SHALL BE SATtSF1ED
' PRIOR TO A FINAL BUILDING INSPECT(ON:
8. The applicant shall complete the required public improvements and cfose-out the
Street Opening Permit.
9. Prior to final inspection for the site and/or the building, the design engineer shall
provide certification to the Building Official that the private water quality facility was
constructed in accordance with the approved plan. (STAFF CONTACT: David
Scott, fi39�171, ext 311).
SECTION 111: BACKGROUN INFORMATION
Site Historv:
No development applications were found to have been filed with the City.
Vcin' Information:
The subject site is located at the eastem terminus of the intersection of SW Tiedeman
Avenue and SW Greenburg Road. Property to the north, east, and south are zoned R-12
(Residential, 12 units per acre). Property to the west is zoned 1-P (lndustrial Park). The
area is developed with a mix of multi-family residential and commercial uses.
Site Information and Pr000sal Descriotion• � .- :
The .72 acre site consists of two (2) lots and is developed with two (2) single-family
residences and associated accessory structures. The site has access to SW Greenburg
Road. The applicant is requesting Conditional Use approval to allow the construction of a
36-bed homeless facif'ity. The proposal will be constructed in two (2) phases. The first
phase will allow the construcdon of a 5,000 square foot building and ten (10) parking
spaces. The facility will include 24 beds (6 guest rooms), common kitchen and dining
facilities, and a child development center. The exisbng residential building will be
removed. The second phase will incfude siting a 1,500 square foot modular building to
allow for administrative offices, construction of an additional four(4) parking spaces, and a
2,630 square foot addition. The facility addition will provide an additional 12 beds (3
additional guest rooms), storage, some additional common facilities, and a managers
apartment for a total of 7,630 square feet.
STAFF REPORT TO TIiE HFJIRING'S OFFICER CUP 97-0006. THE RfTE CENTER PAGE 3 OF 15
The center will be open for persons living there temporarily from 5:00 p.m. to 8:00 a.m.
seven (7) days a week, year round. In addition, the facility will house the child
development center which will operate Monday through Friday from 8:00 a.m. to 5:00 p.m. •
An after school program will also be provided. The Interfaith Outreach Services (IOS)
Health Clinic will be providing medical volunteers who will be available during scheduled - ;
hours. Phase II of the project will include a clothes closet and food pantry for walk-in
clients. The office will be used exclusivefy to provide office space for IOS staff charged .
with the operation of the RITE Center, the associated on-site Self-Sufficiency Program,
and with IOS administrative activities necessary to support the Center.
SECTION IV• APPLICABLE REVIEW CRITERIA AND FINDINGS
COMPLlANCE WITH COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT CODE SECTIONS:
lmpact Studv: Section 18.32.050 states that the applicant shall provide an impact
study to quantify the effect of development on public facilities and services. For
each public facility system and type of impact, the study shall propose
improvements necessary to meet City standard, and to minimize the impact of the
development on the public at large� public facilities systems� and afFected private
property users. In situa6ons where the Community Development Code requires the
dedication of real property interests, the applicant shall either specfically concur
with a requirement for public right-of-way dedication. or provide evidence that
supports that the real property dedication requirement is not roughly proportional
to the projected impacts of the development Section 18.32.250 staties that when a
condition of approval requires the transfer to the pubtic of an interest in real
property, the approval authority shall adopt findings which support the conclusion
that the interest in real property to be transfecred is roughiy p�oportionaf to the
impact the proposed development will have on the public. There are no real property
dedications required with this application. .
Use Classification: The applicant is proposing to construct a homeless facility. This use is
classified in Code Section 18.42 (Use Classfications) as Group Residential. Code Sec��ion
18.54.040 states that Group Residential is a Conditional Use in the R-12 zone.
Conditional Use; Section 18.130.040 contains the following general approval criteria
for a Conditional Use:
The site size and dimensions provide adequate area for the needs of the proposed
use. As indicated on the site plan, the proposed center meets all of the dimensional
requirements for minimum site size, building setbacks, and landscaping.
The characteristics of the site are suitable for the proposed use considering size,
shape, location, topography, and natural features. The site has an irregular shape but
the building is designed to fit well within the property and not have a detrimental visual
impact on surrounding properties. The location of the center is appropriate with direr.t
access to a fully improved major collector street. The site does not contain physical
constraints.
STAF'F REPORT TO THE HEARING'S OFFICER CUP 97-0006- 'I1iE RRE C0�11FR PAGE 4 OF t5
All required public facilities have adequa�e capacity to serve the proposal. Adequate
public facilities are present and currenUy serve the site or shall be provided by conditions of
approval.
- The applicable requirements of the zoning district are met except as modified by this
_ chapter. The proposed use meets all of the applicable requirements of the R-12 zone and
- the conditional use approval criteria.
The supplementary requirements set forth in Chapber 18.114 (Signs) and Section
18.120.180 (Approval Standards) Site Development Review, if applicable, are met
Compliance with the applicable Site Development Review criteria can be satisfied by this
proposal, as demonstrated by the analysis presented within this report and review process,
The use will comply with the applicable policies of the Comprehensive Plan.
Compliance with Comprehensive Plan Policies can be satisfied by this proposal as
demonstrated by the analysis presented within this report and through the review process.
Conditional Use - Grou9 Resident;al; Section 18.130.150(C)(17) states that Group
Residential uses must meet the following additional dimensional requirements:
ARQ���ble Zone• Single-family and multi-famiiy residential. The subject property is
zoned R-12 (Residential� 12 units per acre). ,
Minimum Lot Size• 5�000 square feet The subject site contains approximately 31,360
squar�e feet, exceeding the minimum 5,000 square foot, minimum lot size.
Minimum Setbacks• See applicable zone. The required multiple-family setbadc.s in the
R-12 Zone are as follows: front yard - 20 fee� side yard - 10 fee� and rear yard - 20 feet.
As indicated on the site plan, the proposed structures comply with the required setbacks.
Heiaht Limitations• See applicable zone. The maximum building height in the R-12 zone
is 35 fieet The proposed plan shows that the building height is 24 feet, well under the
maximum allowed.
Com�liance wth All Statie Rea�ir+ements. Applicable state agenaes will ensure that this
facility shall compty with all state requirements.
QfFStreet Parking• see section 18 106 030 Section 18.106.03n e d �q�i� a
minimum of one (1) parking space for each guest room plus 1 space fo� each
employee. The two (2) phases of the center will have a total of nine (9) guest rooms. In
addi6on, there will be up to fnre (5) employees during the day, and fewer staff members
during the remainder of the day and night This proposal, therefore, require.s 14 parking
spaces. There will be a total of sa (6) guest rooms constructed with Phase I. Six (6) parking
spaces are required to serve Phase l. Ten (10) paricing spaces are proposed with the
construc�ion of Phase I. An additionaf three (3) guest rooms and administrative offices will
be constructed with Phase II. An additional four(4) spaces will be constructed with Phase II,
bringing the total on-site paricing to fourteen (14) spaces. Therefore, the proposed phasing
plan complies with this sedion.
STAFF REPORT TO THE HE�4WNG'S OFFICER CUP 57-0006- THE R(T'E CENTfR P/1GE 5 OF 15
Site Develooment Review - Aooroval Standards: Section 18.120.180{A)(1) requires
that a development proposa! be found to be co�sistent with the various standards of
the Community Development Code. The applicable criteria in this case are Chapters '
18.100, 18.102, 18.106, 18.108, 18.114, 18.120, and 18.164. The proposal's consistency
with these Code Chapters is reviewed in the followi�g sections. The proposal contains �
no elements related to the provisions of Code Chapters 18.80 (Planned Developments),
18.84 (Sensifive Lands), 18.92 (Density Computations), 18.94 (Manufactured/Mobile Home
Regulations) or 18.98 (Building Height Limitations: Exceptions}, or 18.144 (Accessory Use
and Structures) which are also (isted under Section 18.120.180.A.1. These Chapters are,
therefore, found to be inapplicable as app�oval standards.
Section 18.120.180(A)(2} p�ovides other Sibe Development Review approval standards
not necessarily covered by the provisions of the previously Iisted sections. These
othe� standards are addressed immediabely below. The proposal contains no elements
related to the provisions of 18.120.180.3 (Exterior Elevations), 18.120.18�.5 (Privacy and
Noise), 18.120.180.6 (Private Outdoor Areas: Residential Use), 18.120.180.7 (Shared
Outdoor Recreation Areas: Residential Use), 18.120.180.8 (100-year Roodplain),
18.120.180.9 (Demarcation of Spaoes), and are, therefore, found to -be inapplicable as
approval standards.
Relationshio to the Natural and Physical Environmen� Section 18.120.180.2 staties
that buildings shall be locabed to preserve existing trees, topography, and natural
drainage and that trees having a six (6) inch caliper or greater, shall be preserved or
replaced by new plantings of equal charactier. The subjed site is currentfy developed
with two (2) residential structures, accessory structu�es, and a gravel paricing lot area.
Existing topography and natural drainage will not be impacted by this proposal. In
accordance with Section 18.150, trees greater than 12-inch caliper will be mitigated. The
proposed plan also includes new paricing lot and street trees.
Buffering. Screening and Comoatibili between adjoining uses: Section
18.120.108.4(A) states that buffering shall be provided between differeni types of land
uses. Buffering has been provided in accordance with the Buffer Matrix (18.100.130) and
Landscaping Section 18.100.070.
Section 18.120.108.4(B) stabes that on�site scr+eening from view of adjoining
properties of such things as service and storage areas, parking tots, and mechanical
devices on roof tops shall be provided. As indicated on the site plan, parking and
storage areas shall be screened from adjoining properties.
Crime Prevention and Safetv: Section 18.120.108.10 requires that exberior lighting
levels be selected and the angles shall be oriented towards areas vulnerable to crime
and shall be placed in areas having heavy pedestrian or vehicular traffic. The City of
Tigard Police Departrnent has reviewed the applicanYs plan and has no comments or
objections to the plan, thereby, satisfying this criteria.
Phased Developmgp� Section 18.120.050 allows approval of a time schedule for
developing a site in phases over a period of time of one year, but in no case shall the
total time period for all phases be greater than tt�ree years without reapplying for site
srn��7 ro niE�►wNCS o�cFR cuP 9�-0006- n+e�c�rr�x Pnce s oF�s
development review. The criberia for approving a phased site development review
proposal is that the following are satisfied:
� The public facilities are constructed in conjunction with or prior to each phase. Ail
public facilities required to serve both phases shall be constructed in conjunction with the
- first phase. -
The development and occupancy of any phase is not dependent on the use of
temporary public facilities {a temporary facitity is any facility not constructed to the
applicable City or district standard). The app(icant is not proposing the use of any
temporary public facilities.
The phased development shall not result in requiring the City or other property
owners to construct public facilities that were required by an approved development
proposal. The applicant shall construd all necessary improvements to serve this
development
�.�R1II9__P1�: Section 18.100.015 requires that the applicant submit a
iandscaping plan. This requirement has been satisfied as the applicant has submitted a
plan indicating the number, type, and location of tnees and shrubs.
�tc�et Trees: Section 18.100.003 staties that all development projects fronting on a
public street shall be required to plant street trees in accordance witt� section
18.100.035. Section 18.100.035 r�equires that street trees be spaced between 20 and
40 feet apart depending on the size classification of the tree at maturity (small,
medium or large)� with a minimum caliper of 2 inches at four fieet in height As
indicated on the landscape plan, street trees shall be provided in accor�dance with this
secbion. �
�creening S�cial Provision@; Section 18.100.110(A) requires the screening of
parking and loading areas. Landscaped parking areas shall include special design-
features which effectively screen the parking lot areas from view. Planting matierials
to be insfialled should achieve a relative balance between low lying and vertical
shrubbery and trees. Trees shall be planted in landscaped islands in all parking
areas, and shall be equally distributed on the basia of one tree for each seven parking
spaces in order to provide a canopy effect The minimum dimension on the
landscape islands shall be three feet and the landscaping shall be probec�ed from
vehicular damage by some fornn of wheel guard or curb. The proposed landscape plan
shows a two (2�foot-high, grassed berm. This berm is not adequate to provide screening of
the parking lot firom view. A revised landscape plan shall be submitted which provides for
landscaping to be incorporated into the berm that will effectively screen the paricing lot from
view. Parking lot trees are required to provide a canopy effect within the parking areas. The
proposed str�eet trees will provide partial canopy coverage of the parking area. In order to
provide the required canopy coverage, a revised landscape plan shall be submitted that
provides for an additional two (2) parlcing lot trees to be located within the landscape islands
adjacent to the driveway.
ST/1FF REPORT TO THE HEIIWNG'S OFFlCER CUP 97-0006- THE RfTf C�NTER PAGE�OF 15
BufFer Matrix: Section 18.100.130 contains the buffer matrix to be used in calculating
widths of buf�ering and screening to be installed between proposed uses. Ttie Matrix
indicaties that where one-story residential use and a parking area, which provides 4 '
50 parki�g spaces, abuts a residential zone the required buffer and screening width
shall be 10 feet The minimum improvements within a buffer area shatl consist of the �
following: 1) At least one row of trees shall be planted. They shall be not less than 10
feet high for deciduous trees and 5 feet high for evergreen trees at the time of
planting. Spacing of the trees depends on the si�e of tfie tree at maturity; 2) In
addition, at least 10 five gallon shrubs or 20 one gallon shrubs shall be planted for
each 1000 square feet of requiced buffer area; 3) The remaining area shall be planted
in (awn, groundcover or spread with bark mulch. The parking lot buffer area contains
approximately 1,500 square feet Therefore, the buffer shall contain an additional 10
five gallon or 20 one gallon shrubs in addition to the one row of trees. The app(icant
has provided screening in acxordance with Section 18.100.070.C, thereby, satisfying this
criteria.
Screening and Buffering Reauirements: Section 18.100.080(E) staties that where _
screening is required the following slandards shall apply in addition to those required
for bufFering; 1) a hedge of narrow or broadleaf evergreen shrubs which will form a 4
foot continuous screen within 2 years of planting, o� 2) an earthen berm planted with
evergreen plant materials which will form a continuous screen 6 feet in height within 2
years. The unplanted portion of the berm shall be plantied in lawn� ground cover or
bark mulch, or; 3) a 5 foot or taller fence or wall shall be construcbed to provide a
continuous sight obscuring scr+een. The applicant has provided scx�eening in acxordance
with Section 18.100.070.C, thereby, satisfying this criteria.
Section 18.100.O70.0 staties that in lieu of these standards, a detailed buffier area
landscaping and screening plan may be submitbed for the Director's approval as an
altemative to the buffer area landscaping and screening standards, provided it
affords the same degree of buffering and screening as required by this code. The
applicant,has proposed an altemative landscaping and screening plan. The applicanYs
namative states that this aftemative plan �nnll perform as well, or better, than the standard
buffer in this s'�tuation. Staff concurs with the applicanYs findings and concludes that this
criteria is satisfied.
Visual Clearance Areas: Section 18.102 requires that a clear vision area shall be
maintained on the corners of all property adjacent to intersecting right-of-ways or the
intersection of a public street and a privatie driveway. A visual clearance area is the
triangular area formed by measuring a 30 foot distance along the street right-of-way
and the driveway and then connecting these two 30 foot distance points with a
straight line. A clear vision area shall contain no vehicle, hedge, planting� fence, wall
structune, signs, or temporary or permanent obstruction exceedi�g three feet in
height The height is measured from the top of the curb, or where no curb exists�
from the street center line grade� except that trees exceeding this height may be
located in this area, provided all branches below eight feet are removed. As indicated
on the site plan, this criteria is satisfied.
ST/\FF REPORT TO THE HEARING'S OFFICER CIJP 97-0006- THE RlTE CE�11'ER PAGE 8 OF 15
Ihe Americ�ns with Di�h�rt�� e�t (,pDAI; Section 18.106.020(M) became effective
on January 26, 1992. All parking areas shall be p�ovided with the reyuired numbers
and si2es of disabled person parking spaces as specified by applicable Stabe of
Oregon and federai standards. All disabled person parking spaces shall be signed
and marked on the pavement as required by these standards. This section requires
- the provision of 1 disabled parking space if 1 to 25 parking spaces are provided. The
- site plan shows the provision of one (1) disabled parking space, thereby, satisfying this
standard.
Bicycle Parkina: Section 18.106.020(0) requires one bicycle parking rack space for
each 15 requir+ed vehicular parking spaces in any development Bicycle parking
areas shall not be located within parking aisles, landscape areas� or pedestrian ways.
This site requires the provision of one (1) bicycle parWng spaoe. The plan shows the
provision of four(4) bicycle parking spaces, thereby, satisfying this standard.
A�: Section 18.108.080 requires that multiple-family residential uses serving 3-19
dw�eiling u�its or commercial and industrial uses which require less than 100 parking
spaces provide one access with a minimum width of 30 feet and a minimum
pavement width of 24 feet The plan shows tfie provision of one (1) accessway with a
width of 23 feet 10 inches (23'10'�. A r�evised plan shall be submitted which provides for a
minimum width of 24 feet, in compliance with this sedion.
bC�ll9et�t�: Section 18.108.050(A) requires that a walkway be extended from the
ground floor entrance of the structure to the str+eet that provides the required ingr+ess
and egress. Unless impractical, walkways should be constructed between a new
development and neighboring developments. Wherever required walkways cross
vehicle access-driveways or parking lots, such crossings shall be designed and
located for pedestrian safety. Requir+ed walkways shall be physically separatied from
motor vehicie traffic and parking by e'nher a minimum six (6) inch vertical separation
(curbed)� or a minimum three (3) foot horizontal separation; except that pedestrian
crossings of traffic aiales are permitbed for distances no greater than 36 feet if
appropriatie landscaping, pavement markings, or contrasting pavement matierials ar�e
used. Walkways shall be a minimum of four (4) feet in width, exclusive of vehicle
overhangs and obstructions such as mailboxes, benches, bicycle racks, and sign
posts. and shall be in compliance with ADA standards. As indicated on the site plan, a
walkway has been provided in accordanoe with this sedion.
It� Removal: Section 18.150.025 requires that a tree plan for the planting� removal
and protiection of trees prepared by a certified arborist shall be provided with a
subdivision application. The tree plan shall include identification of all existing trees,
identification of a program to save existing trees or mitigabe tree removal over 12
inches ln caliper� which trees are to be r+emoved, protection program defining
standards and methods that wtll be used by the applicant bo protiect trees during and
afber construction. The applicant's narraWe states that five (5) deciduous trees are within
the yard of the existing larger house. The two (2) smaller deaduous tnees to the south of
this house will be removed for paricing lot improvements. The remaining three (3) trees
measure 28 inches, 26 inches, and 70 inches, and will be retained. One (1) coniferous tree
in front of the smaller residence will also be removed. The appfiqnt shall provide the caliper
sr��POa�r ro rHE r+�nwr�cs o�c� cuP ��-0oos- n+F wrE co�rrER PAGE 9 OF/S
caliper size of the these trees to be removed. If these trees are greater than 12-inch caliper,
the applicant shaii provide mitigation in accordance with Section 18.t50.025(B)(2).
Mixed Solid Waste and Recyclables Storage: Section 18.116 requires that new
construction incorporates functional and adequate space for on�ifie st�rage and �
efficient coltection of mixed solid wasbe and source separated Recyclables prior to
pick-up and removal by haulers. The applicant must choose one (1) of the following
four (4) methods to demonstrate compliance: Minimum Standard, Wastie
Assessment, Comprehensive Recycling Plan, or Franchised Hauler Review and Sign-
Off. The applicant will have to submit evidence or a plan which indicabes compliance
with this section. Regardless of which method chosen, the applicant will have to
submit a writben sign-off from the franchise hauler regarding the facility location and
compatibility. The plans show the provision of a trash enclosure. The applicant shall
provide a written sign-off from the hauler regarding the compatibility and location of this
facility.
PUBLIC FACILITIES: -
STREETS:
This site is located adjacent to SW Greenburg Road which is classfied as a major
collector street on the City's Transportation Pla� Map. The Ciiy constructed full-width
improvements on Greenburg Road several years ago, which included the frontage of tfiis
site. There is an existing concrete sidewalk and driveway into this site that was provided
as a part of the City project. The right-of-way (ROVI� in this area is adequate for a major
collector stree� No further dedications are needed or required.
Traffic impacts from this development should be relatively insignficant. as most of the
cfients of the site will travel by foot, bicycle or bus (Greenburg Road has bicycle lanes and
is on a Tri-Met bus route). The applicanYs narrative (Page 11) indicates that the typical
ratio of clients to vehicles is '!0 to '1. There will also be a maximum of fire employees on
the site during the day. Client use of the site is typically during the evening hours and
ovemight. Based on this information, it is Staffs opinion that this proposal will not resutt in
a signficant increase in traffic on the street system and therefore no additional
improvements to the roadway system are needed.
The location of the driveway was selected by the City in anticipation of development of this
site and to be able to serve both subject tax lots (a joint driveway). Although the
signalized intersection at SW Tiedeman Avenue is within 100 feet of the driveway, the City
determined that the driveway location would function adequately for this site. During peak
driving hours, the stacking of southbound cars on Greenburg Road at the Tiedeman
Avenue signal will extend beyond the site driveway. During these times� the driveway will
likely be limited to right-in, right-out tuming movements.
STAFF REPORT TO THE HEARING'S OFFICER CUP 97-0OOG- THE R1T'E CENTER PAGE 10 OF 15
WAT�g;
This site lies on the border between the City's service area and Tualatin Valley Water
District's service area. There are public water fines in SW Greenburg Road, two of which
� are operated by the City. There is a 16-inch water line adjacent to the east side of the site
� that coufd serve this development. The applicant's plan indicates that they propose to
_ obtain water service from the 16-inch water (ine. The applicant should contact Mike Miller
at 639-4171, ext. 395 for further information about obtaining water service from the City.
SANITARY SE R•
The�e is an existing &inch public sanitary sewer line in SW Greenburg Road. The existing
house on this site is presently served. The applicant proposes to extend a new service
lateral from the main line to serve the new building. This will require an open-cut of the
street and a Street Opening Permit from the Engineering Departrnent.
STORM DRAINAGE•
The proposed storm plan for this development indicates that storm water will be collected
and directed into a water quality facility in the northwest comer of the site. From there, the
water will be directed into the existing storm drainage line in SW Greenburg Road. The
open-cut for the storm connection will also need to be covered by the Street Opening
Permit
�
_. STORM WA R QUALITY•
The City has agreed to enforce Surface Water Management (SWM) regulations
established by the Unfied Sewerage Agency (USA) (Resolution and Order No. 91-47, as
amended by R�O 91-75) which require the construction of on-site water quality facilities.
The facilfies shall be designed to remove 65 percent of the phosphorus contained in 100
percent of the storm water runoff generated from newty created impervious surfaces. I�
addition, a maintenance plan is required to be submitted indicating the frequency and
method to be used in keeping the facility maintained through the year. Prior to issuance of
a buiiding permit� the applicant shall submit plans and calculations for a water qua(ity
facility that will meet the intent of R&O 91-47. In addition, the applicant shall submit a
maintenance plan for the facility that must be reviewed and approved by the City prior to
issuance of the building permit.
As was stated previously, the applicant will provide an on-site water quality facility. An
extended dry detention pond is proposed and the preliminary plan appears to provide
adequate volume for treatment of this site.
The proposed private water quality facility will require a special inspection, to be carried
out by the developers design engineer. Prior to final inspection for the site and/or the
building, the design engineer shall provide certification to the Building Official that the
water quality facility was constructed in accordance with the approved plan.
STAFF REPORT TO TNE HE/1RING'S OFFlCER CUP 97-0OOG- TNE RRE CEHTER PAGE 11 OF 15
GRADING AND EROSION C�NTROL:
USA R�O 91-47 also regulates erosion control to reduce the amouni of sediment and "
other pollutants reaching the public storm and surface water system resutting from
development, construction, grading, excavating, clearing, and any other activity which
accelerates erosion. Per R&O 91-47, the applicant is required to submit an erosion
control plan for City review and approval prior to issuance of City pennits. .
EXISTING OVERHEAD UTIL(TY LINES:
COMPLIANCE WITH COMPREHENSIVE PLAN POLICIES:
Citizen Inout Policy 2.1.1 provides the City will assure that citizens will be provided
an opportunity to participate in all phases of the planning and development review
process. Policy 2.1.1 is satisfied because a neighborhood meeting was held by the
applicant on March 26, 1997, notice of the public hearing was provided to owners of
property within 250 feet and was published in a newspaper of general circulation.
Water Qualitv: Policy 4.2.1 provides that all development within the Tigard urban
planning area shall comply with applicable fedetal, state and regional wafier quality
standards. Policy 4.2.1 is satisfied as the applicant constructed an on-site water qualihr
facility as required by Unfied Sewerage Agency Resolution and Order No. 96�4.
Diversity of Housing: Policy 6.1.1 provides that the City shall provide an opportunity
for a diversity of housing densities and residential types at various price and rent
levels. Policy 6.1.1 is satisfied as this use futfills an important need for homeless families
and individuats and helps provide the diversiiy of housing types contemplated by the
Comprehensive Plan. _
Public Utilities: Policies 7.1.2� 7.3.1 and 7.4.4 provides that the City will require as a
condition of development approval that public wa�er, sewer, and sfionn drainage will
be provided and designed to City standards and that utilities shall be placed
. underground.�� Policies 7.1.2, 7.3.1 and 7.4.4 are safisfied as utilities shall be provided to
senie this proposal.
Fire Protection: Poticy 7.6.1 states that Fire District shall review alI new development
applications to ensure adequate fire probection is available to serve each new
development Tualatin Valley Fire and Rescue was provided with a copy of the previous
development plan in compliance with Policy 7.6.1.
Street Imcrovements: Policy 8.1.1 provides that the City will plan for a safe and
efficient street and roadway system that meets current needs and anticipated future
growtl� and development This policy is satisfied as SW Greenburg Road has been
constructed to major collector standards. �
ST/1FF REPORT TO THE HEARlNG'S OFFICER CUP 97-0006- THE RtTE CENTER PAGE 12 OF 1 S
Street ImQrovements. Policy 8.1.3 states that the City will require the following as a
precondition of approval:
- 1. Development shall abut a dedicated street or have other adequate access;
, 2. Street right-of-way shall be dedicated where the street is substandard in width;
- 3. The developer shall commit to construction of the streets, curbs, and
sidewalks to City standards within the development;
4. The developer shall participate in the improvement of existing streets, curbs,
and sidewalks to the e�ctent of the development's impacts; and
5. Street improvement4 shall be made and street signs or signals shall be
provided when the development is found to create or intiensify a traffic hazard.
This po(icy is satisfied as the City has already constructed full-width street improvements on
SW Greenburg Road.
�ECTION V• STAFF AND Oc;FNrv COMMENTS
Tualatin Valley Fire and Rescue has reviewed the proposal and has offered the
following comments:
Plans are not approved at this bme. The applicant shall address the following plan notes
and re-submit plans for review and approval:
Access roads shall be within 150 feet of all portions of the exterior wall of the first story of
the building as measured by an approved route around the exterior of the building. An
approved tumaround is required if the remaining distance to an approved intersecting
roadway, as measured along the fire apparatus acxess road, is greater than 150 feet
(UFC Sec. 902.2.1). � .
Fire apparatus access roads shall be of an all-weather surface that is easiiy
distinguishable from the surrounding area and is capable of supporting not less than
12,500 pounds point load (wheel load) and 50,000 pounds live load (gross vehicle weight).
. (UFC Sec. 902.2.2.2).
The inside tuming radius and outside tuming radius shall not be less than 25 feet and 45
feet respectfully, as measured from the same oenter point. (UFC Sec. 902.2.2.3).
Where fire apparatus access roadways are not of sufficient width to accommodate parked
vehicles, "No Parking" signs shall be installed on one (1) or both sides of the roadway and
in tumarounds as needed. (UFC Sec. 902.2.4). Signs shall read "NO PARKING - FIRE
LANE - TOW AWAY ZQNE, ORS 98.810" and shall be installed with a clear space above
ground level of seven (7) feet. Signs shall be 12 inches wide by 18 inches high and shall
have black or red letters and border on a white background (UFC Sec. 901.4.5.(t)(2) 8� (3)).
ST11FF REPOFtT TO THE HEARING'S OFFICER C11P 97-0006- T1�E RlTE CENTER PAGE 13 OF 15
Fire apparatus access roadway curbs shall be painted yellow and marked "NO PARKING
FIRE LANE" at each 25 feet. Lettering shall have a stroke of not less than one (1) inch -
wide by six (6) inches high (UFC Sec. 901.4.5.2). •
The minimum number of fire hydrants for a building shall be based on the required fire ,
flow prior to giving any credits for fire protection systems. There shal( not be less than one
(1) fire hydrant for the first 2,000 gallons per minute (GPM) required fire flow and one (1)
additional fire hydrant for each 1,000 GPM or portion thereof over 2,000 GPM. Fire �
hydrants shall be evenly spaced around the building and their locations shall be approved
by the Chief(UFC Sec. 903.4.2.1).
No portion of the exterior of a commercial building shall be located more than 250 feet
from a fire hydrant when measured in an approved manner around the outside of the
building and along an approved fire apparatus access roadway (UFC Sec. 903.4.2.1).
The required fire flow for the building shall not exceed 3,000 gallons per minute (GPM) or
the available GPM in the water delivery system at 20 per square inch (psi). A worksheet
for calculating the required fire flow is available form the Fire Marshal's office (UFG-Sec.
903.3).
Approved fire apparatus access roadways and fire fighting water supplies shall be
installed and operational prior to any other construction on the site or subdivision (UFC
Sec. 8704).
The fire district would oppose the variance on reduction of parking. Illegally parked
vehicles cause problems during fire fighting.
Unified Sewerage Agency has reviewed the proposal and has offered the following
comments:
Sanitarv Sewer. The development shoutd be provided with a means of disposal for
sanitary sewer. The means of disposal should be in accordance with R8�0 96-44 (1lnfied
Sewerage Agency's Construction Design Standards, Jufy 1996 edition). Engineer should
verify sanitary sewer is available to up-hill adjacent properties, or extend service as
required by R8�0 96-4�4.
�orm Sewer. The development should have access to public storm sewer. Engineer
should verify that public storm sewer is available to up-hill adjacent properties, or extend
stoRn secvice as required by R�O 96�4. Hydraulic and hydrological analysis of storm
conveyance system is necessary. If downstream storm conveyance does not have the
capacity to convey the volume during a 25-year, 24-hour storm event, the applicant is
responsible for mitigating flow.
Water Qualitv: Developer should provide a water quality facility to treat the new
impervious surface being constructed as part of this development.
STAFF RFPORT TO THE HEAFtING'S OFFICER CUP 97-000B• THE RITE CEHTER PAGE 14 OF 15
The City of Tigard Building Division indicatied the following: The p�oposed building
will cross two (2) property lines. The applicant shall consolidate the properties into one (1)
parcel.
' The City of Tigard Maintenance Services Division indicated the following: The
• applicant shouid consider not to "blind" tee into the storm piping at two (2) locations on
site. On site detention pond is private. Suggest sanitary cleanout between the building
and street.
PGE has reviewed this application and has offered no comments or objections.
(�/.�-�.�.Gz.,. ���-, .t..c _ . J�ne 27. 1997
PREPARED BY: wlliam D'Andrea DATE
Associate Planner, AICP
June 27. 1997
APPROVED BY: Richard Bewersdorff DATE
Planning Manager
i:lcurpin\willlcup96-07.dec
STAFF REPORT TO TFIE NEARlNG'S OFFICER CtJP 97-0006- THE RRE CENTER PAGE 15 OF 15
bl� uniLlldYpo au1W
�
-• -
r .� ♦• � � "* y • 6�'� � ��. . •�' I
. �, ° O '* � ,'�^ ;�;�'� '
V o► , u"` � ' �
_ ,j O i I�
� ��� �4=1p� `• � ` _ — � ' I
i
I
�t O — — . , . ..
�.I
� � �' ... � . � I ' • . ', . O
�� � .
� � O • �a.
Oo ''*' (� • __ ..,• ,;' e
� � � �' t r � _�1 - � .
. I � ��
3 � - i � � . _
� '� �• � . . . � '��V /.Nti
� . I � � O � ' � r'7f� �A
i � � .;: � .���� �
. � �� � ��
������
I � f �� � °�
—.t—�► � -r ' � � �
( f �� r
� �- - - � � � g�
I
�'• , v,
i� � � �, �
n I
D �.. �
� � � . . . � � � ; F��t�a=6�s •
'�s rn • ' I � '
� � • • � ...� r� �� r D���
Z • '� � �s �
� . _ • .J • �Y �
� � � �•,f `_'�. � � � �
, e! ��� �
' "' � �. ' �
' ', � � �
. • , �
_.�
CITY OF TIGARD PLANNING DIVISIDN �
r
_ ,
�
, �
BL SF�f�DY W
� � ,
_ �
� � �
�
I �
� ,
-- �
������ �
] SUBlE�T � I,� �
t L� � I
P CELS--> . ,:� � I ,
� � �
: � c� '
_
,� �
� ,
,� .
� �. .
� t�,
� �
� —
� �
,
'o '
;.�;
._ �
�U �
. , �
�� ;
�
_ _
- � � N CUP 91-0006/VAR 91-0004
A . , , „ ,
-°�-� � NE R TE CEH ER ► �
cmr of no�Rc
Commumty�Dcvtlopmtnt
SF+apingA�Better Community
PUBL�C l��ARING NflTICE
NOTICE IS HEREBY GIVEN THAT THE TIGARD HEARINGS OFFICER, AT A MEETING ON MONDAY.
JULY 7. 1997 AT�;QQ PM, IN THE TOWN HALL OF THE TIGARD CIVIC CENTER, 13125 SW HALL
BOULEVARD, TIGARD, OREGON 97223 WILL CONSIDER THE FOLLOWING APPLICATION:
�=1LE NO(S): CONDITiONAL USE PERMIT[CUPI 97-0006
YARIANCE[YARI 97-0004
FILE TITLE: TNE RITE CENTER
_ �
APPLICANT: Interfaith Outreach Services �WNER: Same
PO Box 230821
Tigard, OR 97281
f�EQUEST: A request for the foliowing development applications: 1) Conditional Use approval
to allow the construction of a 36-bed homeless facility; 2) Variance request to allow
10 parking spaces where 14 spaces are required; and 3) Variance request to
allow an 8-foot side yard building setback whereas, 10 feet is required. ,
LOCATION: 11070 and 11130 SW Greenburg Road; WCTM 1 S1 35CA, Tax Lot 2500 and
2600. Eastem terminus of SW Greensburg Road and SW Tiedeman Avenue.
ZONE: Residential, 12 Units Per Acre; R-12. The R-12 zone allows single-family
attached/detached residential units, multiple-family residential units, residential
� care facilities, mobile home parks and subdivision, public support services, famiiy
day care, home occupation, temporary use, residential fuel tank, and accessory
structures, among other uses.
APPLICABLE
REVIEW
CRITERIA: Community Development Code Sections 18.54.050, 18.100, 18.102, 18.1 Q6,
18.108, 18.120, 18.130, 18.134, 18.150 and 18.164.
THE PUBLIC HEARING ON THIS MATTER WILL BE CONDUCTED IN ACCORDANCE WITH THE RULES OF CHAPTER
18.32 OF THE COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT CODE AND RULES OF PROCEDURE ADOPTED BY THE TIGARD CITY
COUNCIL ANG AVAILABLE AT CITY HALL, OR RULES OF PROCEDURE SET FORTH IN CHAPTER 18.30.
ASSISTIVE LIS�ENING DEVICES ARE AVAILABLE FOR PERSONS WITH IMPAIRED HEARING. THE CITY WILL ALSO
=NDEAVOR TO ARRANGE FOR QUALIFIED SIGN LANGUAGE INTERPRETERS AND (1UALIFIED BILINGUAL
lNTERPRETERS UPON REQUEST. PLEASE CALL (503) 639-4171, EXT. 320 (VOICE7 OR (503) 684-2772 (TDD -
�ELECOMMUNICATIONS DEVICES FOR THE DEAF} NO LESS THAN ONE WEEK PRIOR TO THE HEARING TO MAKE
ARRANGEMENTS.
UP 97-0OOB/VAR 97-0004 THE RITE CENTER NOTICE OF 7A197 PUBUC NF�4RING
ANY�NE WISHING TO PRESENT WRITTEN TESTIMONY ON THIS PROPOSED ACTION MAY DO SO IN WRITING
PRIOR TO OR AT THE PUBLIC HEARING. ORAL TESTIMONY MAY BE PRESENTED AT THE PUBLIC HEARING. AT
THE PUBLIC HEARING, THE HEARINGS �FFICER WILL RECEIVE A STAFF REPORT PRESENTATION FROM THE
CITY PIANNER, OPEN THE PUBLIC HEARING, AND INVITE BOTH ORAL AND WRITTEN TESTIMONY. THE
HEARINGS OFFICER MAY CONTINUE THE PUBLIC HEARiNG TO ANOTHER MEETING TO OBTAIN ADDITIONAL
INFORMATION, OR CLOSE THE PUBLIC HEARING AND TAKE ACTION ON THE APPLICATION.
IF A PERSON SUBMITS EVIDENCE IN SUPPORT TO THE APPLICATION AFTER JUNE 16. 1997, ANY PARTY IS
ENTITLED TO REQUEST A CONTINUANCE OF THE HEARING. IF THERE IS NO CONTINUANCE GRANTED AT THE
HEARING, ANY PARTICIPANT IN THE HEARING MAY RE�UEST THAT THE RECORD REMAIN OPEN FOR AT LEAST
SEVEN (7) DAYS AFTER THE HEARING. A REQUEST THAT THE RECORD REMAIN OPEN CAN BE MADE ONLY AT
THE FIRST EVIDENTIARY H�,4RING (ORS 197.763(6).
INCLUDED IN THIS NOTICE IS A LIST OF APPROVAL CRITERtA APPLICABLE TO THE REQUEST FROM THE TIGARD
COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT CODE AND THE TIGARO COMPREHENSIVE PLAN. APPROVAL OR DISAPPROVAL
OF THE REQUEST BY THE HEARINGS OFFICER WILL BE BASED UPON THESE CRITERIA AND THESE CRITERIA
ONLY. AT THE HEARING IT IS IMPORTANT THAT COMMENTS RELATING TO THE REQUEST PERTAIN
SPECIFICALLY TO THE APPLICABLE CRITERIA LISTED.
FAILURE TO RAISE AN ISSUE IN PERSON OR BY LETTER AT SOME POINT PRIOR TO THE CLOSE OF THE
HEARING �N THE REQUEST ACCOMPANIED BY STATEMENTS OR EVIDENCE SUFFICIENT TO ALLOW THE
HEARINGS AUTHORITY AND ALL PARTIES TO RESPOND PRECLUDES AN APPEAL, AND FAILURE TO SPECIFY
THE CRITERION FROM THE COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT CODE OR COMPREHENSIVE PLAN AT WHICH A
COMMENT IS DIRECTED PRECLUDES AN APPEAL TO THE LAND USE BOARD OF APPEALS BASED ON THAT
ISSUE.
ALL DOCUMENTS AND APPLICABLE CRITERIA IN THE ABOVE-NOTED FILE ARE AVAILABLE FOR INSPECTION AT
NO C�ST �R COPIES CAN BE OBTAINED FOR TWENTY-FIVE CENTS (25C) PER PAGE, OR THE CURRENT RATE
CHARGED FOR COPIES AT THE TIME OF THE REQUEST. AT LEAST SEVEN (7) DAYS PRIOR TO THE HEARING, A
COPY OF THE STAFF REPORT WILL BE AVAILABLE FOR INSPECTION AT NO COST, OR A COPY CAN BE
OBTAINED FOR TWENTY-FIVE CENTS (25C) PER PAGE, OR THE CURRENT RATE CHARGED FOR COPIES AT THE
TIME OF THE REQUEST.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION PLEASE CONTACT THE STAFF PLANNER WILLIAM D'ANDREA AT (503) 639-4171,
TIGARD CITY HALL, 13125 SW HALL BOULEVARD, TIGARD, OREGON 97223.
I �
I
m���r �
�� �
PA6Cf15->
� I
J
.� I i
� I
// � 1
CUP 97-0006/VAR 97-0004 THE RfTE CENTER NOTICE OF 7!7/97 PUBLIC HEARING
.i
,�,� ,ir,� �:i�
June 25, 1997
Nir. Will D'Andrea, AICP
Community Development Department
City of Tigard
13125 SW Hall Blvd. RECFI�/F�
T'igard, Oregon 97223
Re: Revision to CUP 97-0006
JUN 2 � ;gc;7
Interfaith Outreach Services RITE Center COMMUNIir utrcwr�,�,ri
Dear Will:
Please accept the attached drawings as a request to modify CUP 97-0006. The modificacions
center around removal of the existing residence that was originally intended to be converted
into administration offices. As a result of the significant cosc to renova[e the house, we propose
to remove the house as part of the first phase and leave that portion of the site as landscape
- area. This will remove the adminisirative offices from phase one.
�.:,
In phase two, we propose to site a modular Administration Office building of approximately
1.500 square feet on the northwest corner of the site to provide administrative offices. In
addicion, phase two will include 4 new parking spaces bringing the total parking on site to 14
spaces.
Please find enclosed seven each of[he following drawings (dated 6-25-97):
Sheet A3 Phase 1 Site Plan This sheet has been revised to show the existing house
(item /�7 on the Legend) dotted in and the house is
noted to be removed.
Sheet A3.1 Phase 2 Site Plan This is a new sheet and includes a new modular
Administration O�ce building located in �he northwest
corner of the si�e and 4 new parking spaces have been
added.
Sheet A7 Phase ? Floor Plan This sheet has been revised to include the new modular
Administration O�ce building of approximately 1,�00
sf. shown on the upper left corner of the sheet.
1r�nit,•�;. \ in i,�oi : �i��,ir�l•. 11 1. i'�.
;-1 \1� Eirt.�uitr.;n�� i'•�rtiami.ilN'�-•'��'�
.ill:3.'_'_'h.U.i�)11 litx.iU:i.:�3.:ib}9
..s .
r, � -��u;.-.
ti*l�c� x _ ��..y�.'.�
.��1�.�������'.� �`�.,�I �.�)�� ��'.���t.,�;�)\ ..
t
Mr. D'Andrea
June 25, 1997
page 2
Thank you for your consideration of the proposed modifications and if you have any questions,
please call. We look forward to the successful completion of che CUP.
Sincerely,
ARCHITECTS VAN LOM/EDWARDS AIA,PC
Sid L. Scott, AIA
i
CITY OF TIGARD �`-� �_�` ;--�.::� _� � c`,.
13125 S.W. Hall Blvd. �, ��G��a �'-,�'��'�'��
- ,�,�.�:PflS1AGfj;
Tigard,Oregon 97223 J�N I 6'S�-r ,. .
y �� ��
��s� ' �_ -�L'�}--�._�-� ,�
�F?EG�� �i'�4�`=`��� �x
1S135CA-90126
^ (!1�IC, WAIBLE,RICHARD L
�A � I r " , : ;� 2�33 N SKIDMORE CT
/` � � ���" PORTLAND,OR 97217
J�—q�►
"-- WAIB133 972172d17 1296 Of�/18/97
FORWARD TIME EXP RTN 70 SEND
WAIBLE ' RICI-:ARD L SR ST 14
PO BOf{ 1257
SCAPP003E OR 97056-1257
RETURN TO SENDER
..wr.wr�ww��
�-r��-��-�,a�-� -: III���II�����II��II��II���II���II���II������IIII���II���II���I
CU ��� -_. ,�f�
� �
�S
_
�-- r
�/1l%� � . . ►r � S
� ��
� �-
�' �l� � ,�,�,v y'
R 'I/ � �
� � � � �,,.�
�
v
11;1.111'1 h�"1�
� June 25, 1997 •
Mr. Will D'Andrea, AICP .
Community Development Department
City of Tigard
13125 SW Hall Blvd.
Tigard. Oregon 97223
. Re: Revision to CUP 97-0006
Iaterfaith Outreach Services RITE Center
Dear Will: '
Please accept the attached drawiags as a request to modify CUP 9?-0006. The modifications
center around removal of the existing residence that was originally intended to be converted
into adminisaation offices. As a result of the significant cost to reaovate the house, we propose
to remove the house as part of the first phase and leavc that portion of the site as landscape
area. This will remove the adminis�ative offices from phase one.
In phase two, we proposa to site a modulaz Administration Office building of approximately
1,500 square feet on the nor[hwest corner of the site to provide administrative offices. In
addition, phase two will include 4 new parking spaces bringiag the total parking on site to 14
spaces. " �
Please find enclosed seven each of the following drawings(dated 6-25-97):
Sheet A3 Phase I Site Plan This shect has becn revised to show the existing house
. (item�4+7 on the Legend}dottzd in and the house is
noted to be removed.
Sheet A3.1 Phase 2 Site Plan This is a new sheet and includes a new modulaz
Administration Office building located in the northwest
comer of the site and 4 new parking spaces have been
added.
Shees A7 Phase 2 Floor Plan This sheet has been revised to include the new modular
Administraaon Office building of approximately 1,500
sf. shown on the upper left comer of the sheet.
��•+.��.�,��_�.�„ i..��� �.i,,.,•,i_. �i�. r�
.S� \�\ F�r�l.`wb•:SI>'I I'..riF.ui.l_1)�f'1'�p•l -.
��c�:iirrF:�-r��� i.�►�i i•:in��iu�
Mr. D'Andrea
i June 25, 1997 •
page 2
Thank you for your consideratioa of the proposed modifications and if you.have any questions,
please call. We look forward tu the successful completion of the CUP.
Sincenly,
ARCHITECTS VAN LOM/EDWARDS AIA,PC
Sid L. Scott, AIA .
1
4lckeever/�Iorris, Inc.
209 S.W. Oak Sr,rsr,Suire 200
Porrland prcgon 9720d
503.228.7352 '
jaz 503.228.7365 .
June 23, 1997
Gene Birchill
Tualatin Valley Fire and Rescue
4755 SW Griffirh Drive, PO Box 4755
Beaverton, Oregon 97076
RE: RI1'E Center CUP Plan Review
Your File No.: 1558-97
Dear Gene:
Thank you for taki.ng the time on June 19, 1997 to discuss your June 4 comments to the
Tigazd Planning regazding the captioned CUP.To summarize the key outcomes:
1. With respect to the 150 foot emergency access requirement,TVFR will be satisfied
by a letter of agreement from the neighboring condominium project allowing emergency
vehicle access and hoIding the District harmless for any damages.The proposed RTTE
Center parki.ng lvt will not have to be redesigned Gates will be added at both ends of
the children's playground to allow access by firefighters and emergency personnel.
This ailowance would be effective onIy for the first phase of the RITE Center. When
the second phase is construct�d other options may be required.
We understand that TVFR would still prefer a sprinkler system in Phase 1 also and we
will be attempting to obtain donated materials to make this economically feasible.We
hope to have Cluef Johnson's help in this effort.
2. With respect to your comments on the pazki.ng variance, we understand your
objec�on is withdrawn,subject to che stripging and posting requirements you outline3,
and a TVFR review of the RTI'E Center's written policies for their residents.
A�ain, thank you for your assistance in furthering this im�ortant projec�
Sincerely,
James H. Rapp
Senior 1�Ianager
� )��
ce: Will D'Andrea,Tigard Planning
P��Kim Brown, IOS
D�stgn �id Scott, Scott Archicects
Public Im�olvemenr
Project Managemenr
�
Agenda Item: 2.3
Hearing Date: Juhr 7. 1997 Time: 7:00 PM
STAFF REP�RT TO THE
HEARING'S OFFICER CITY OF T10ARD
FOR THE CITY OF TIGARD, OREGON �°'�'"""t�'�`°`�°�"""`
S A Bettes Communi
SECTION i: APPLICATION SUMMARY
CASES: EILE NAME: THE RIT C:FNTFR
Conditional Use Permit (CUP) 97-0006
PROPOSAL: A request for Conditional Use approval to allow the construction of a
36-bed homeless facility.
APPLICANT: Interfaith Outreach Services OWNER: Same
PO Box 230821
Tigard, OR 97281
COMPREHENSIVE
PLAN
DESIGNATION: Medium Density.
ZONING
DESIGNATION: Residential, 12 Units Per Acre; R-12.
LOCATION: 11070 and 111�0 SW Greenburg Road; WCTM 1 S 135CA, Tax Lots
02500 and 02600. Located in the eastem terminus of SW Tiedeman
Street and SW Geenburg Road.
APPLICABLE
REVIEW
CRITERIA: Community Development Code Chapters 18.54, 18.100, 18.102,
18.106, 18.108, 18.120, 18.130, 18.150 and 18.164. Comprehensive
Plan Policies 2.1.1, 4.2.1, 6.1.1, 7.1.2, 7.3.1, 7.4.4, 7.6.1, 8.1.1 and
8.1.3.
�ECTION II: STAFF RECOMMENDATION
Staff recommends that the Hearings Officer find that the proposed Conditional Use witl not
adversely affect the health, safety and welfare of the City. Therefore, staff recommends
APPROVAL, subject to the following recommended conditions of approval:
STAFF REPORT TO THE HEARING'S OFFICER CUP 97-OOOG- THE RITE CENTER PAGE 1 OF 15
CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL
PRIOR TO THE ISSUANCE OF THE SITE AND/OR BUILDING PERMIT(S),
THE F�LLOWING CONDITIONS SHALL BE SATISFIED: -
(Unless otherwise notied, the staff contact shall be Brian Rager,
Engineering Department(503) 639-4171.) ,
1. Prior to issuance of a site and/or building permit, a Street Opening Permit will be
required for this project to cover the sanitary sewer and storm sewer connections in
SW Greenburg Road, plus any other work proposed in the public right-of-way. The
applicant will need to submit five (5) copies of a proposed public improvement plan
for review and approval. NOTE: these plans are in addition to any drawings required
by the Building Division and should only include information relevant to the public
improvements. This permit shall be obtained by the applicant prior to issuance of the
site and/or building permit.
2. As a part of the public improvement plan submittal, the Engineering Department shall
be provided with the name, address and telephone number of the individual or
corporate entity who will be responsible for executing the compliance agreement and
providing the financial assurance for the public improvements.
3. Any proposed services from the City water line shall be shown on the proposed
public improvement construction drawings and shall be reviewed and approved by
the City's Water Department, as a part of the Engineering Department plan review.
4. The applicant shall provide an on-site water quality facility as required by Unfied
Sewerage Agency Resolution and Order No. 91�7. Final plans and calculations
shall be submitted to the Engineering Department for review and approval prior to
issuance of the site and/or building permit. In addition, a proposed maintenance plan
shall be submitted along with the plans and calculations for review and approval.
5. Revised site and landscaping plans shall be submitted for review by the Planning
Division, Staff Contact: Will D'Andrea (503-639-4171). The revised plans shall
include the following:
A. landscaping to be incorporated into the berm that will effectively screen the
parking lot from view, and an additional two (2) parking lot trees to be located
within the landscape islands adjacent to the driveway;
B. minimum driveway width of 24 feet;
C. caliper size of the trees to be removed. If these trees are greater than 12-inch
caliper, the applicant shall provide mitigation in accordance with Section
18.150.025(B)(2); and
D. written sign-off from the hauler regarding the compatibility and location of the
- trash enclosure facility.
STAFF REPORT TO THE HEARING'S OFFICER CUP 97-OOOG- THE RITE CENTER PAGE 2 OF 15
6. Documentation that tax lots 02500 and 02600 have been consolidated.
7. Plans approved by Tualatin Valley Fire and Rescue (AGENCY CONTACT: Gene
Birchill).
THE FOLLOWING CONDITIONS SHALL BE SATISFIED
PRtOR TO A FINAL BUILDING INSPECTION:
8. The applicant shall complete the required public improvements and close-out the
Street Opening Permit.
9. Prior to final inspection for the site and/or the building, the design engineer shall
provide certification to the Building Official that the private water quality facility was
constructed in accordance with the approved plan. (STAFF CONTACT: David
Scott, 639-4171, ext. 311).
SECTION III: BACKGROUND INFORMATION
Site Historv:
No development applications were found to have been filed with the City.
�Jicini Information:
The subject site is located at the eastern terminus of the intersection of SW Tiedeman
Avenue and SW Greenburg Road. Property to the north, east, and south are zoned R-12
(Residential, 12 units per acre). Property to the west is zoned I-P (Industrial Park). The
area is developed with a mix of multi-family residential and commercial uses.
Site Information and Proposal Descri tp ion:
The .72 acre site consists of two (2) lots and is developed with two (2) single-family
residences and associated accessory structures. The site has access to SW Greenburg
Road. The applicant is requesting Conditional Use approval to allow the construction of a
36-bed homeless facility. The proposal will be constructed in two (2) phases. The first
phase will allow the construction of a 5,000 square foot building and ten (10) parking
spaces. The facility will include 24 beds (6 guest rooms), common kitchen and dining
facilities, and a child development center. The existing residential building will be
removed. The second phase will include siting a 1,500 square foot modular building to
allow for administrative offices, construction of an additional four (4) parking spaces, and a
2,630 square foot addition. The facility addition will provide an additional 12 beds (3
additional guest rooms), storage, some additional common facilities, and a manager's
apartment for a total of 7,630 square feet.
STAFF REPORT TO THE HEARING'S OFFICER CUP 97-0006- THE R(TE CENTER PAGE 3 OF 15
The center will be open for persons living there temporarily from 5:00 p.m. to 8:00 a.m.
seven (7) days a week, year round. In addition, the facility will house the child
development center which will operate Monday through Friday from 8:00 a.m. to 5:00 p.m.
An after school program will also be provided. The Interfaith Outreach Services (IOS)
Health Clinic will be providing medical volunteers who will be available during scheduled
hours. Phase II of the project will include a clothes closet and food pantry for walk-in
clients. The office will be used exclusively to provide office space for IOS staff charged
with the operation of the RITE Center, the associated on-site Self-Sufficiency Program,
and with IOS administrative activities necessary to support the Center.
SECTION IV: APPLICABLE REVIEW CRITERIA AND FINDINGS
COMPLIANCE WITH COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT CODE SECTIONS:
lmoact Studv: Section 18.32.050 states that the applicant shall provide an impact
study to quantify the effect of development on public facilities and services. For
each public facility system and type of impact, the study shall propose
improvements necessary to meet City standard, and to minimize the impact of the
development on the public at large, public facilities systems, and affected private
property users. In situations where the Community Development Code requires the
dedication of real property interests, the applicant shall either specifically concur
with a requirement for public right-of-way dedication, or provide evidence that
supports that the real property dedication �equirement is not roughly proportional
to the projected impacts of the development Section 18.32.250 states that when a
condition of approval requires the transfer to the public of an interest in real
property, the approval authority shall adopt findings which support the conclusion
that the interest in real property to be transferred is roughly proportional to the
impact the proposed development will have on the public. There are no real property
dedications required with this application.
Use Classification: The applicant is proposing to construct a homeless facility. This use is
classfied in Code Section 18.42 (Use Classfications) as Group Residential. Code Section
18.54.040 states that Group Residential is a Conditional Use in the R-12 zone.
Conditional Use: Section 18.130.040 contains the following general approval criteria
for a Conditional Use:
The site size and dimensions provide adequate area for the needs of the proposed
use. As indicated on the site plan, the proposed center meets all of the dimensional
requirements for minimum site size, building setbacks, and landscaping.
The characteristics of the site are suitable for the proposed use considering size,
shape, location, topography, and natural features. The site has an irregular shape but
the building is designed to fit well within the property and not have a detrimental visual
impact on surrounding properties. The location of the center is appropriate with direct
access to a fully improved major collector street. The site does not contain physical
constraints.
STAFF REPORT TO THE HEARING'S OFFICER CUP 97-0006- THE RITE CENTER PAGE 4 OF 15
All required public facilities have adequate capacity to serve the proposal. Adequate
public facilities are present and currently serve the site or shall be provided by conditions of
approval.
. The applicable requirements of the zoning district are met except as modified by this
chapter. The proposed use meets all of the applicable requirements of the R-12 zone and
the conditional use approval criteria.
The supplementary requirements set forth in Chapter 18.114 (Signs) and Section
18.120.180 (Approval Standards) Site Development Review, if applicable, are met
Compliance with the applicable Site Development Review criteria can be satisfied by this
proposal, as demonstrated by the analysis presented within this report and review process.
The use will comply with the applicable policies of the Comprehensive Plan.
Compliance with Comprehensive Plan Policies can be satisfied by this proposal as
demonstrated by the analysis presented within this report and through the review process.
Conditional Use - Grouo Residential: Secticn 18.130.150(C)(17) states that Group
Residential uses must meet the following additional dimensional requirements:
ARolicable Zone: Single-family and multi-family residential. The subject property is
-� zoned R-12 (Residential, 12 units per acre).
.,.
�""�� Minimum Lot Size: 5,000 square feet The subject site contains approximately 31,360
square feet, exceeding the minimum 5,000 square foot, minimum lot size.
Minimum Setbacks: See applicable zone. The required multiple-family setbacks in the
R-12 zone are as follows: front yard - 20 feet; side yard - 10 feet; and rear yard - 20 feet.
As indicated on the site plan, the proposed structures comply with the required setbacks.
Heig�t Limitations: See applicable zone. The maximum building height in the R-12 zone
is 35 feet. The proposed plan shows that the building height is 24 feet, well under the
maximum allowed.
ComQliance �th All State Reauirements. Applicable state agencies will ensure that this
facility shall comply with all state requirements.
Qff-Street Parking: see section 18.106.030. Section 18.106.030.A.4 requires a
minimum of one (1) parking space for each guest room plus 1 space for each
employee. The finro (2) phases of the center will have a total of nine (9) guest rooms. In
addition, there will be up to five (5) employees during the day, and fewer staff members
during the remainder of the day and night. This proposal, therefore, requires 14 parking
spaces. There will be a total of six (6) guest rooms constructed with Phase I. Six (6) parking
spaces are required to serve Phase I. Ten (10) parking spaces are proposed with the
construction of Phase I. An additional three (3) guest rooms and administrative offices will
be constructed with Phase II. An additional four (4) spaces will be constructed with Phase II,
bringing the total on-site parking to fourteen (14) spaces. Therefore, the proposed phasing
plan complies with this section.
STAFF REPORT TO THE HEARING'S OFFICER CUP 97-0OW- THE RITE CENTER PAGE 5 OF 15
Site Develo�ment Review - Anproval Standards• Section 18.120.180(A)(1) requires
that a development proposal be found to be consistent with the various standards of
the Community Development Code. The applicable criteria in this case are Chapters
18.100, 18.102, 18.106, 18.108, 18.114, 18.120, and 18.164. The proposal's consistency
with these Code Chapters is reviewed in the following sections. The proposal contains
no elements related to the provisions of Code Chapters 18.80 (Planned Developments), �
18.84 (Sensitive Lands), 18.92 (Density Computations), 18.94 (Manufactured/Mobile Home
Regulations) or 18.98 (Building Height Limitations: Exceptions), or 18.144 (Accessory Use
and Structures) which are also listed under Section 18.120.180.A.1. These Chapters are,
therefore, found to be inapplicable as approval standards.
Section 18.120.180(A)(2) provides other Site Development Review approval standards
not necessarily covered by the provisions of the previously listed sections. These
other standards are addressed immediately below. The proposal contains no elements
related to the provisions of 18.120.180.3 (Exterior Elevations), 18.120.180.5 (Privacy and
Noise), 18.120.180.6 (Private Outdoor Areas: Residential Use), 18.120.180.7 (Shared
Outdoor Recreation Areas: Residential Use), 18.120.180.8 (100-year floodplain),
18.120.180.9 (Demarcation of Spaces), and are, therefore, found to be inapplicable as
approval standards.
Relationshiu to the Natural and Physical Environment: Section 18.120.180.2 states
that buildings shall be located to preserve existing trees, topography, and natural
drainage and that trees having a six (6) inch caliper or greater, shall be preserved or
replaced by new plantings of equal character. The subject site is currently developed
with two (2) residential structures, accessory structures, and a gravel parking lot area.
Existing topography and natural drainage will not be impacted by this proposal. In
accordance with Section 18.150, trees greater than 12-inch caliper will be mitigated. The
proposed plan also includes new parking lot and street trees.
Buffering. Screening and Com�ty between adjoining uses: Section
18.120.108.4(A) states that buffering shall be provided between different types of land
uses. Buffering has been provided in accordance with the Buffer Matrix (18.100.130) and
Landscaping Section 18.100.070.
Section 18.120.108.4(B) states that on-site screening from view of adjoining
properties of such things as service and storage areas, parking lots, and mechanical
devices on roof tops shall be provided. As indicated on the site plan, parking and
storage areas shall be screened from adjoining properties.
Crime Prevention and Safetv_: Section 18.120.108.10 requires that exterior lighting
levels be selected and the angles shall be oriented towards areas vulnerable to crime
and shall be placed in areas having heavy pedestrian or vehicular traffic. The City of
Tigard Police Depa�tment has reviewed the applicant's plan and has no comments or
objections to the plan, thereby, satisfying this criteria.
Phased Develo�nt: Section 18.120.050 allows approval of a time schedule for
developing a site in phases over a period of time of one year, but in no case shall the
total time period for all phases be greater than three years without reapplying for site
STAFF REPORT TO THE HEARING'S OFFICER CUP 97-0OOf- THE RITE CENTER PAGE 6 OF 15
development review. The criteria for app�oving a phased site development review
proposal is that the following are satisfied:
The public facilities are constructed in conjunction with or prior to each phase. All
. public facilities required to serve both phases shall be constructed in conjunction with the
first phase.
The development and occupancy of any phase is not dependent on the use of
temporary public facilities (a temporary facility is any facility not constructed to the
applicable City or district standard). The applicant is not proposing the use of any
temporary public facilities.
The phased development shall not result in requiring the City or other property
owners to construct public facilities that were required by an approved development
proposal. The applicant shall construct all necessary improvements to serve this
development.
Landscapj.p.g Plan: Section 18.100.015 requires that the applicant submit a
landscaping plan. This requirement has been satisfied as the applicant has submitted a
plan indicating the number, type, and location of trees and shrubs.
Street Trees: Section 18.100.003 states that all development projects fronting on a
public street shall be required to plant street trees in accordance with section
' 18.100.035. Section 18.100.035 requires that street trees be spaced between 20 and
� 40 feet apart depending on the size classification of the tree at maturity (small,
medium or large), with a minimum caliper of 2 inches at four feet in height As
indicated on the landscape plan, street trees shall be provided in accordance with this
section.
Screening S�ecial Provisions: Section 18.100.1'f0(A) requires the screening of
parking and loading areas. Landscaped parking areas shall include special design
features which effectively screen the parking lot areas from view. Planting materials
to be installed should achieve a relative balance between low lying and vertical
shrubbery and trees. Trees shall be planted in landscaped islands in all parking
areas, and shall be equally distributed on the basis of one tree for each seven parking
spaces in order to provide a canopy effect The minimum dimension on the
landscape islands shall be three feet and the landscaping shall be protected from
vehicular damage by some form of wheel guard or curb. The proposed landscape plan
shows a two (2)-foot-high, grassed berm. This berm is not adequate to provide screening of
the parking lot from view. A revised landscape plan shall be submitted which provides for
landscaping to be incorporated into the berm that will effectively screen the parlcing lot from
view. Parking lot trees are required to provide a canopy effect within the parking areas. The
proposed street trees will provide partial canopy coverage of the parking area. In order to
provide the required canopy coverage, a revised landscape plan shall be submitted that
provides for an additional two (2) parking lot trees to be located within the landscape islands
adjacent to the driveway.
STAFF REPORT TO THE HEARING'S OFFICER CUP 97-0OW- THE RITE CENTER PAGE 7 OF 15
Buffer Matrix: Section 18.100.130 contains the buffer matrix to be used in calculating
widths of buffering and screening to be installed between proposed uses. The Matrix
indicates that where one-story residential use and a parking area, which provides 4- ,
50 parking spaces, abuts a residential zone the required buffer and screening width
shall be 10 feet The minimum improvements within a bufFer area shall consist of the
following; 1) At least one row of trees shall be planted. They shall be not less than 10
feet high for deciduous trees and 5 feet high for evergreen trees at the time of
planting. Spacing of the trees depends on the siZe of the tree at maturity; 2) In
addition, at least 10 five gallon shrubs or 20 one gallon shrubs shall be planted for
each 1000 square feet of required buffer area; 3� The remaining area shall be planted
in lawn, groundcove� or spread with bark mulch. The parking lot buffer area contains
approximately 1,500 square feet Therefore, the buffer shall contain an additional 10
five gallon o� 20 one gallon shrubs in addition to the one row of trees. The applicant
has provided sc�eening in accordance with Section 18.100.070.C, thereby, satisfying this
criteria.
Screening and Buffering_�gquirements: Section 18.100.080(E) states that where
screening is required the following standards shall apply in addition to those required
for buffering; 1) a hedge of narrow or broadleaf eve�green shrubs which will fonn a 4
foot continuous screen within 2 years of planting, or; 2) an earthen bernn planted with
evergreen plant materials which will form a continuous screen 6 feet in height within 2
years. The unplanted po�tion of the berm shall be planted in lawn, ground cover or
ba�k mulch, or; 3) a 5 foot or taller fence or wall shall be constructed to provide a
continuous sight obscuring screen. The applicant has provided screening in accordance
with Section 18.100.070.C, thereby, satisfying this criteria.
Section 18.100.070.0 states that in lieu of these standards, a detailed buffer area
landscaping and screening plan may be submitted for the Director's approval as an
alterr�ative to the buffer area landscaping and screening standards, provided it
affords the same degree of buffering and screening as required by this code. The
applicant has proposed an altemative landscaping and screening plan. The applicanYs
narrative states that this altemative plan will perFoRn as well, or better, than the standard
buffer in this situation. Staff concurs with the applicant's findings and concludes that this
criteria is satisfied.
Visual Clearance Areas: Section 18.102 requires that a clear vision area shall be
maintained on the comers of all property adjacent to intersecting right-of-ways or the
intersection of a public street and a private driveway. A visual clearance area is the
triangular area fonned by measuring a 30 foot distance along the street right�f-way
and the driveway and then connecting these two 30 foot distance points with a
straight line. A clear vision area shall contain no vehicle, hedge, planting, fence, wall
strvcture, signs, or temporary or permanent obstruction exceeding three feet in
height The height is measured from the top of the curb, or where no curb exists,
from the street center line grade, except that trees exceeding this height may be
located in this area, provided all branches below eight feet are removed. As indicated
on the site plan, this criteria is satisfied.
STAFF REPORT TO THE HEARING'S OFFICER CUP 97-0006- THE RI'TE CENTER PAGE 8 OF 15
The Americans with Disabilities Act (ADAI: Section 18.106.020(M) became effective
on January 26, 1992. All parlcing areas shall be provided with the requi�ed numbers
- and sizes of disabled person parking spaces as specified by applicable State of
Oregon and federal standards. All disabled person parking spaces shall be signed
_ and marked o� the pavement as required by these standards. This section requires
the provision of 1 disabled parking space if 1 to 25 parking spaces are provided. The
site plan shows the provision of one (1) disabled parking space, thereby, satisfying this
standard.
Bicycle Parkina: Section 18.106.020(0) requires one bicycle parking rack space for
each 15 required vehicular parking spaces in any development Bicycle parking
areas shall not be located within parking aisles, landscape areas, or pedestrian ways.
This site requires the provision of one (1) bicycle parking space. The plan shows the
provision of four (4) bicycle parking spaces, thereby, satisfying this standard.
Access: Section 18.108.080 requires that multiple-family residential uses serving 3-19
dwelling units or commercial and industrial uses which require less than 100 parking
spaces provide one access with a minimum width of 30 feet and a minimum
pavement width of 24 feet The plan shows the provision of one (1) accessway with a
width of 23 feet. 10 inches (23'10"). A revised plan shall be submitted which provides for a
minimum width of 24 feet, in compliance with this section.
Walkwavs: Section 18.108.050(A) requires that a walkway be extended from the
ground floor entrance of the structure to the street that provides the required ingress
and egress. Unless impractical, walkways should be constructed between a new
development and neighboring developments. Wherever required walkways cross
vehicle access-driveways or parking lots, such crossings shall be designed and
located for pedestrian safety. Required walkways shall be physically separated from
motor vehicle traffic and parking by either a minimum six (6) inch vertical separation
(curbed), or a minimum three (3� foot horizontal separation; except that pedestrian
crossings of traffic aisles are permitted for distances no greater than 36 feet if
appropriate landscaping, pavement markings, or contrasting pavement materials are
used. Walkways shall be a minimum of four (4) feet in width, exclusive of vehicle
overhangs and obstructions such as mailboxes, benches, bicycle racks, and sign
posts, and shall be in compliance with ADA standards. As indicated on the site plan, a
walkway has been provided in accordance with this section.
Tree Removal: Section 18.150.025 requires that a tree plan for the planting, removal
and protection of trees prepared by a certified arborist shall be provided with a
subdivision application. The tree plan shall include identification of all existing trees,
identification of a program to save existing trees or mitigate tree removal over 12
inches in caliper, which trees are to be removed, protection program defining
standards and methods that will be used by the applicant to protect trees during and
after construction. The applicant's narrative states that five (5) deciduous trees are within
the yard of the existing larger house. The two (2) smaller deciduous trees to the south of
this house will be removed for parking lot improvements. The remaining three (3) trees
measure 28 inches, 26 inches, and 70 inches, and will be retained. One (1) coniferous tree
in front of the smaller residence will also be removed. The applicant shall�provide the caliper
STAFF REPORT TO THE HEARING'S OFFICER CUP 97-OOOG- THE RITE CENTER PAGE 9 OF 15
caliper size of the these trees to be removed. If these trees are greater than 12-inch caliper,
the applicant shall provide mitigation in accordance with Section 18.150.025(B)(2).
�ixed Solid Waste and Recyclables Storage: Section 18.116 requires that new
construction incorporates functional and adequate space for on-site storage and
efficient collection of mixed solid waste and source separated Recyclables prior to
pick-up and removal by haulers. The applicant must choose one (1) of the following
four (4) methods to demonstrate compliance: Minimum Standard, Waste
Assessment, Comprehensive Recycling Plan, or F�anchised Hauler Review and Sign-
Off. The applicant will have to submit evidence or a plan which indicates compliance
with this section. Regardless of which method chosen, the applicant will have to
submit a written sign-oif from the franchise hauler regarding the facility location and
compatibility. The plans show the provision of a trash enclosure. The applicant shall
provide a written sign-off from the hauler regarding the compatibility and location of this
facility.
PUBLIC FACILITIES:
STREETS:
This site is located adjacent to SW Greenburg Road which is classified as a major
collector street on the City's Transportation Plan Map. The City constructed full-width
improvements on Greenburg Road several years ago, which included the frontage of this
site. There is an existing concrete sidewalk and driveway into this site that was provided
as a part of the City project. The right-of-way (ROV11) in this area is adequate for a major
collector street. No further dedications are needed or required.
Traffic impacts from this development should be relatively insignificant, as most of the
clients of the site will travel by foot, bicycle or bus (Greenburg Road has bicycle lanes and
is on a Tri-Met bus route). The applicant's narrative (Page 11) indicates that the typical
ratio of clients to vehicles is 10 to 1. There will also be a maximum of five employees on
the site during the day. Client use of the site is typically during the evening hours and
ovemight. Based on this information, it is StafPs opinion that this proposal will not result in
a significant increase in trafFc on the street system and therefore no additional
improvements to the roadway system are needed.
The location of the driveway was selected by the City in anticipation of development of this
site and to be able to serve both subject tax lots (a joint driveway). Although the
signalized intersection at SW Tiedeman Avenue is within 100 feet of the driveway, the City
deteRnined that the driveway location would function adequately for this site. During peak
driving hours, the stacking of southbound cars on Greenburg Road at the Tiedeman
Avenue signal will extend beyond the site driveway. During these times, the driveway will
likely be limited to right-in, right-out tuming movements.
STAFF REPORT TO THE HEARING'S OFFICER CUP 97-0006- THE RfTE CENTER PAGE 10 OF 15
��
- This site lies on the border between the City's service area and Tualatin Valley Water
District's service area. There are public water lines in SW Greenburg Road, two of which
, are operated by the City. There is a 16-inch water line adjacent to the east side of the site
that could serve this development. The applicant's plan indicates that they propose to
obtain water service from the 16-inch water line. The applicant should contact Mike Miller
at 639-4171, ext. 395 for further information about obtaining water service from the City.
SANITARY SEWER:
There is an existing 8-inch public sanitary sewer line in SW Greenburg Road. The existing
house on this site is presently served. The applicant proposes to extend a new service
lateral from the main line to serve the new building. This will require an open-cut of the
street and a Street Opening Permit from the Engineering Department.
STORM DRAINAGE:
The proposed storm plan for this development indicates that storm water will be collected
and directed into a water quality facility in the northwest corner of the site. From there, the
water will be directed into the existing storm drainage line in SW Greenburg Road. The
open-cut for the storm connection will also need to be covered by the Street Opening
Permit.
STORM WATER QUALITY:
The City has agreed to enforce Surface Water Management (SWM) regulations
established by the Unified Sewerage Agency (USA) (Resolution and Order No. 91-47, as
amended by R8�0 91-75) which require the construction of on-site water quality facilities.
The facilities shall be designed to remove 65 percent of the phosphorus contained in 100
percent of the storm water runoff generated from newly created impervious surfaces. In
addition, a maintenance plan is required to be submitted indicating the frequency and
method to be used in keeping the facility maintained through the year. Prior to issuance of
a building permit, the applicant shall submit plans and calculations for a water quality
facility that will meet the intent of R8�0 91-47. In addition, the applicant shall submit a
maintenance plan for the facility that must be reviewed and approved by the City prior to
issuance of the building permit.
As was stated previously, the applicant will provide an on-site water quality facility. An
extended dry detention pond is proposed and the preliminary plan appears to provide
adequate volume for treatment of this site.
The proposed private water quality facility will require a special inspection, to be carried
out by the developer's design engineer. Prior to final inspection for the site and/or the
building, the design engineer shall provide certification to the Building Official that the
water quality facility was constructed in accordance with the approved plan.
STAFF REPORT TO 7HE HEARING'S OFFICER CUP 97-0OW- THE RITE CENTER PAGE 11 OF 15
GRADING AND EROSION CONTROL:
USA R&0 91-47 also regulates erosion control to reduce the amount of sediment and _
other pollutants reaching the public storm and surface water system resulting from
development, construction, grading, excavating, clearing, and any other activity which
accelerates erosion. Per R&O 91-47, the applicant is required to submit an erosion �
control plan for City review and approval prior to issuance of City permits.
EXISTING OVERHEAD UTILITY LINES:
rOMPLIANGE WITH GOMPREHENSIVE PLAN POLICIES•
Citizen In�ut: Policy 2.1.1 provides the City will assure that citizens will be provided
an opportunity to participate in all phases of the planning and development review
process. Policy 2.1.1 is satisfied because a neighborhood meeting was held by the
applicant on March 26, 1997, notice of the public hearing was provided to owners of
property within 250 feet and was published in a newspaper of general circulation.
Water Qualitv: Policy 4.2.1 provides that all development within the Tigard urban
planning area shall comply with applicable federal, state and regional water quality
standards. Policy 4.2.1 is satisfied as the applicant constructed an on-site water quality
facility as required by Un�ed Sewerage Agency Resolution and Order No. 96-�4.
Diversity of Housing: Policy 6.1.1 provides that the City shall provide an oppo�tunity
for a diversity of housing densities and residential types at various price and rent
levels. Policy 6.1.1 is satisfied as this use fulfills an important need for homeless families
and individuals and helps provide the diversity of housing types contemplated by the
Comprehensive Plan.
Public Utilities: Policies 7.1.2, 7.3.1 and 7.4.4 provides that the City will require as a
condition of development approval that public water, sewer, and storm drainage will
be provided and designed to City standards and that utilities shall be placed
underground. Policies 7.1.2, 7.3.1 and 7.4.4 are satisfied as utilities shall be provided to
serve this proposal.
Fire Protection: Policy 7.6.1 states that Fire District shall review all new development
applications to ensure adequate fire protection is available to serve each new
development Tualatin Valley Fire and Rescue was provided with a copy of the previous
development plan in compliance with Policy 7.6.1.
Street Improvements: Policy 8.1.1 provides that the City will plan for a safe and
efficient street and roadway system that meets current needs and anticipated future
growth and development This policy is satisfied as SW Greenburg Road has been
constructed to major collector standards.
STAFF REPORT TO THE HEARING'S OFFICER CUP 97-0OOG- THE RITE CENTER PAGE 12 OF 15
Street Improvements. Policy 8.1.3 states that the City will require the following as a
precondition of approval:
1. Development shail abut a dedicated street or have other adequate access;
2. Street right-of-way shall be dedicated where the street is substandard in width;
3. The developer shall commit to construction of the streets, curbs, and
sidewalks to City standards within the development;
4. The developer shall participate in the improvement of existing streets, curbs,
and sidewalks to the extent of the developmenYs impacts; and
5. Street improvements shall be made and street signs or signals shall be
provided when the developme�t is found to create or intensify a traffic hazard.
This policy is satisfied as the City has already constructed full-width street improvements on
SW Greenburg Road.
SECTION V: STAFF AND AGENCY COMMENTS
Tualatin Valley Fire and Rescue has reviewed the proposal and has offered tt�e
,;.�.
following comments:
Plans are not approved at this time. The applicant shall address the following plan not��
and re-submit plans for review and approval:
Access roads shall be within 150 feet of all po�tions of the exterior wall of the first story of
the building as measured by an approved route around the exterior of the building. An
approved tumaround is required if the remaining distance to an approved intersecting
roadway, as measured along the fire apparatus access road, is greater than 150 feet.
(UFC Sec. 902.2.1).
Fire apparatus access roads shall be of an all-weather surFace that is easily
distinguishable from the surrounding area and is capable of supporting not less than
12,500 pounds point load (wheel load) and 50,000 pounds live load (gross vehicle weight).
(UFC Sec. 902.2.2.2).
The inside turning radius and outside turning radius shall not be less than 25 feet and 45
feet respectfully, as measured from the same center point. (UFC Sec. 902.2.2.3).
Where fire apparatus access roadways are not of sufficient width to accommodate parked
vehicles, "No Parking" signs shall be installed on one (1) or both sides of the roadway and
in turnarounds as needed. (UFC Sec. 902.2.4). Signs shall read "NO PARKING - FIRE
LANE - TOW AWAY ZONE, ORS 98.810° and shall be installed with a clear space above
ground level of seven (7) feet. Signs shall be 12 inches wide by 18 inches high and shall
have black or red letters and border on a white background (UFC Sec. 901.4.5.(I)(2) 8� (3)).
STAFF REPORT TO THE HEARING'S OFFICER CUP 97-0006- THE RITE CENTER PAGE 13 O�95
Fi�e apparatus access roadway curbs shall be painted yellow and marked "NO PARKING
FIRE LANE" at each 25 feet. Lettering shall have a stroke of not less than one (1) inch
wide by six (6) inches high (UFC Sec. 901.4.5.2).
The minimum number of fire hydrants for a building shall be based on the required fire
flow prior to giving any credits for fire protection systems. There shall not be less than one -
(1) fire hydrant for the first 2,000 gallons per minute (GPM) required fire flow and one (1)
additional fire hydrant for each 1,000 GPM or portion thereof over 2,000 GPM. Fire
hydrants shall be evenly spaced around the building and their locations shall be approved
by the Chief(UFC Sec. 903.4.2.1).
No portion of the exterior of a commercial building shall be located more than 250 feet
from a fire hydrant when measured in an approved manner around the outside of the
building and along an approved fire apparatus access roadway (UFC Sec. 903.4.2.1).
The required fire flow for the building shall not exceed 3,000 gallons per minute (GPM) or
the available GPM in the water delivery system at 20 per square inch (psi). A worksheet
for calculating the required fire flow is available form the Fire Marshal's office (UFC Sec.
903.3).
Approved fire apparatus access roadways and fire fighting water supplies shall be
installed and operational prior to any other construction on the site or subdivision (UFC
Sec. 8704).
The fire district would oppose the variance on reduction of parking. Illegally parked
vehicles cause problems during fire fighting.
Unified Sewerage Agency has reviewed the proposal and has offered the following
comments:
Sanitary Sewer: The development should be provided with a means of disposal for
sanitary sewer. The means of disposal should be in accordance with R80 96-44 (Unified
Sewerage Agency's Construction Design Standards, July 1996 edition). Engineer should
verify sanitary sewer is available to up-hill adjacent properties, or extend service as
required by R8�� 96-44.
Storm Sewer: The development should have access to public storm sewer. Engineer
should verify that public storm sewer is available to up-hill adjacent properties, or extend
storm service as required by R&O 96-44. Hydraulic and hydrological analysis of storm
conveyance system is necessary. If downstream storm conveyance does not have the
capacity to convey the volume during a 25-year, 24-hour storm event, the applicant is
responsible for mitigating flow.
Water Qualitv: Developer should provide a water quality facility to treat the new
impervious surface being constructed as part of this development.
STAFF REPORT TO THE HEARING'S OFFICER CUP 97-0006- THE RRE CENTER PAGE 14 OF 15
The City of Tigard Building Division indicated the following: The proposed building
will cross two (2) property lines. The applicant shall consolidate the properties into one (1)
- parcel.
� The City of Tigard Maintenance Services Division indicated the following: The
applicant should consider not to "blind" tee into the storm piping at two (2) locations on
site. On site detention pond is private. Suggest sanitary cleanout between the building
and street.
PGE has reviewed this application and has offered no comments or objections.
Gr���P�.�..., ��� a(�t-c� June 27. 1997
PREPARED BY: William D'Andrea DATE
Associate Planner, AICP
June 27. 1997
APPROVED BY: Richard Bewersdorff DATE
Planning Manager
i:\cu rpinlwilllcup96-07.dec
STAFF REPORT TO THE HEARING'S OFFICER CUP 97-0006- THE RITE CENTER PAGE 15 OF 15
i
i cx�s..�a�ee cur. s arne,�e.sueo - i
REDUGED TO e►LLOW 2�'•10• � dKE RACK
DR�vEW4Y IO I'L.ATGI�p1ldp
] QNTRdJGE DRIVEWAT II NEW S1�ElTER�AGILIT7
3 rARKMG q PATIO
4 �IGNT Pp�E 14' HI(�►d Ij PNa1sE 7 PUIURE EXrdN810N !
� TRAS41 ENGLpbU!!E 14 {W1�KlIJAT plC�l
• D<Tl/�RION r01�Q 1� MOMI't!M�16N
1 /k��TN6 H01J6[�MR�b� � rt►+c�
.��; � �
�'/. ' • '
.}. � � _ O
i_' � \ � h1 I
'� � ' • ��
� O r • . I� V/ i
� � .
r
1
1 " ,{ , O . �
,. . . Q . - , C� i
. H ,_� ' '
� , � I
� � rllOPERTT LNE �
w �' I
:. � z I
� � '� � . tQQ '- ' ' � � � • . � � � .. �
'� ;
� �Q � � ., i - - — - - — - -t . . Q j
� � . o � . r ' � ,�` -�
� . �� � — ———I. ; �,� G. i
Ya I
� � I �. • � Y � � �
� ' � � � � � � I . � � i
� . �
� � O — --� j..l- , Q �
� . . _ Ia .�' — - - - .
�
� � � �„ � . i i . -. -� . . � �
•- � .. . � •�. — i
�, b �, E . �, � � . , . . � � �,.. :
�� � � O' L �-_ _ - - - - - -� : . � 1
t = � L:.- — . -� O ;
� � . � i
, � . . .� ... . . �' i
' � =� U
- • r9 t
.r , , '
. • : " 1
1
;
I
CASE NC�. �
SITE PLAN !
c�p s�-000s ;
EXH 1 B IT MAP r"'� - '
nE�rr�c� �
.
i
�
�
BL SHADY W
� ' �
�
�
������ �
� l SUBlECT '
;
._
P RCELS--> ; �
� � � �
� ! c�
_
�
�
C6
� �
._
�-
.
;O
�
��
._
�U
. �
- ,
��
_� _ _
N CUP 97-0006/VAR 97-0004
A , � � � , �ER ; _
-�-�-- NE R E CEN ��--
CITY 0 F TI GAR D CITY OF TIGARD
NEARINGS OFFiCER ShapiregA�terCo�unity
IULY T,1991-7:00 P.M.
AGEHDA
1. CALL TO ORDER
2. PUBLIC HEARING
2.1 AT � T MONOPOLE TOWER
Conditional Use PeRnit(CUP) 97-0004
LOCATION: 13707 SW Pacific Highway; WCTM 2S103DD, Tax Lot 00400.
PROPOSAL: The applicant has requested Conditional Use Permit approval fo� a 50-foot
tall cellular communications monopole structure and associated equipment structures.
COMPREHENSIVE PLAN DESIGNATION: General Commercial; C-G. ZONING
DESIGNATION: General Commercial; C-G. APPLICABLE REVIEW CRITERIA:
Community Development Code Chapters 18.32, 18.62, 18.98, 18.100, 18.102, 18.106,
18.108 and 18.130.
2.2 AT 8 T MONOPOLE TOWER
Conditional Use Permit(CUP) 97-0005
Variance (VAR) 97-0003
LOCATION: 12562 SW Main Street; WCTM 2S102AC, Tax Lot 01101. PROPOSAL:
The applicant has requested Conditional Use Permit approval for a 50-foot tall cellular
communications monopole structu�e and associated equipment structures. The applicant
has also requested Variance approval to eliminate the requirement for a paved surFace to
the proposed communications facility. ZONING DESIGNATION: Central Business
District; CBD. COMPREHENSIVE PLAN DESIGNATION: Central Business District;
CBD. APPLICABLE REVIEW CRITERIA: Community Development Code Chapters
18.32, 18.66, 18.98, 18.100, 18.102, 18.106, 18.108, 18.130 and 18.134.
2.3 THE RITE CENTER
Conditional Use Permit(CUP) 97-0006
LOCATION: 11070 and 11140 SW Greenburg Road; WCTM 1S135CA, Tax Lots 02500
and 02600. Located in the eastem terminus of SW Tiedeman Street and SW Geenburg
Road. PROPOSAL: A request for Conditional Use approval to allow the construction of a
36-bed homeless facility. COMPREHENSIVE PLAN DESIGNATION: Medium Density.
ZONING DESIGNATION: Residential, 12 Units Per Acre; R-12.
3. OTHER BUSINESS
4. ADJOURNMENT
TIGARD HEARING'S OFFICER PAGE 2 OF 2
7l7l97 PUBLIC HEARING AGENDA h:lpatty4nasterslagendho.mst
CITY OF TIGARD
HEARING'S OFFICER
JULY 7, 1997 - 7:00 P.M.
TOWN HALL
TtGARD CITY HALL,
13125 SW HALL BOULEVARO
TIGARD, 4R 97223
�/ �nyone w�sh�ng to speAk on An AgendA item
shoutd s�gn on the AppropriAte s�9n-in sheet(s}.
PUBLIC N�TICE:
Assistive Listening Devices are available for persons with impaired
hearing and should be scheduled for Hearings Officer meetings by
noon on the Monday prior to the meeting. Please call (503) 639-4171,
Ext. 320 (voice) or (503) 684-2772 (TDD - Telecommunications
Devices for the Deafl. Upon request, the City will also endeavor to
arrange for the following services:
➢ Qualified sign language interpreters for persons
with speech or hearing impairments; and
➢ Qualified bilingual interpreters.
Since these services must be scheduled with outside service providers, it is
important to allow as much lead time as possible. Please notify the City of
Tigard of your need(s) by 5:00 p.m. on the Wednesday preceding the
meeting date at the same phone numbers as listed above if you are
requesting such services.
(OVER FOR HEARING AGENDA ITEM(S)
TIGARD HEARING'S OFFICER PAGE 1 OF 2
717/97 PUBLIC HEARING AGENDA h:lpatty4nasterslagendho.mst
Jr�''S`N V4<<�, Tualatin Valley Fire 8� Rescue
ti ` �
��� Fire Preventi,�pp�qNNING
� � �
,�FiRESGJ 4755 SW Griffith Drive - PO Box 4755 - Beave�ton,OR 97076 - (503)526-2469 - FAX 526-2538 .
JUN 0 4 1997
�LETTER ❑ NO LETTER TIME
To 4�� �-�• �' IV�! � 1'L F'{4 CITY OF TIGAflO Date:
❑WC ❑CC ❑ MC ❑ BV �'TI ❑TU ❑ DU ❑SH ❑WI ❑KC Jurisdiction Fle Number. C 97_��
Project Name:�f F �� T� c..3i�.���"'�1/z� Project Address:_ � � 07 d l�� ��� �7 cJ Cibt'�L+'3S►.'�c�KC.�
NFB�R File Number. (Whenever referring to this project please include the NF&R File Number) �
Project approved
�Project not approved- Please address items checked below and re-submit plans for review and approval to the: = .
�NF&R Fire Marshal's Office
❑ Planning Department having jurisdiction for routing to the TVFBR Fre Marshal's Office
Project condltionally approved subject to correction of items checked below. •
This is a Flre and Lite Safety Plan Review and is based on the 1994 Editlons ot the Unifortn Flre Code (UFC) and those sections
oi ihe Unifortn Building Code(UBC)and Uniform Mechanical Code(UMC)specifically referencing the fire department, and other
local nances,regulations and guidelines.
1)FlRE APPARATUS ACCESS ROAD DISTANCE FROM BUILDING AND TURNAROUNDS: Access roads shall be within 150
feet of all portions of the exterior wall of the first story of the buildng as measured by an approved route around the exterior of the
building. An approved tumaround is required if the remaining distance to an approved intersecting roadway,as measured along
the fire apparatus access road,is greater than 150 feet.(UFC Sec.902.2.1)
2) FlRE APPARATUS ACCESS ROAD EXCEPTION FOR AUTOMATIC SPRINKLER PROTECTION: When buildings are
completely protected with an approved automa6c fire sprinlder system,the requiremertts for fire apparatus access may be
modfied as approved by the Chief. (UFC Sec.902.2.1 Exception 1)
3) ADOITIONAL ACCESS ROADS: Where there are 25 or more dwellings,an approved second fire apparatus access roadway
must be provided to a city/counry roadway or access easemenL(UFC Sec.902.2.2)
4) FlRE APPARATUS ACCESS ROAD WIDTH AND VERTICAL CLEARANCE: Fre apparatus access roads shall have an
unobstructed driving surface with a width of not less than 20 feet(15 feet for not more than two dwelling units),and an
Xunobstructed vertical clearance of not less than 13 feet 6 incties.(UFC Sec.902.22.1)
5)SURFACE AND LOAD CAPACITIES: Fre apparatus access roads shall be of an all-weather surface that is easily
distinguishable from the surrounding area and is capable of supporting not(ess than 12,500 pounds point ioad(wheel load)and
50,000 pounds live load(gross vehicle weight). (UFC Sec.9022.2.2)
Please provide documentation from a registered engineer that the design will be capable of supporting such loading.
Please provide documentation from a registered engineer that the finished construction is in accordance with the
approved plans or the requirements of the Fre Code.
�` 6)TURNING RADIUS: The inside tuming radius and outside tuming radius shall not be less than 25 feet and 45 feet respectfully,
as measured from the same center point. (UFC Sec.902.2.2.3)
7) DEAD END ROADS: Dead end fire apparatus access roads in excess of 150 feet in length shall be provided with an approved
tumaround. Diagrams of approved tumarounds are available from the fire district.(UFC Sec.902.2.2.4)
8) BR(DGES: Bridges shall be designed, inspected and final construction approved by a registered engineer. The bridge shall be
designed in accordance with the American Association of Highway and Transportation Officials `Standard Specifrcations for
Highway Bndges." The bridge shall be designed for a live load sufficient to carry 50,000 pounds. (UFC Sec.902.2.2.5)
/� 9) NO PARKING SIGNS: Where fire apparatus access roadways are not of sufficient width to accommodate parked vehicles,"No
� Parking'signs shall be installed on one or both sides of the roadway and in tumarounds as needed. (UFC Sec.902.2.4) Signs
shall read'NO PARKING- FIRE LANE-TOW AWAY ZONE,ORS 98.810'and shall be installed with a clear space above
ground level of 7 feet. Signs shall be 12 inches wide by 18 inches high and shall have black or red letters and border on a white
background. (UFC Sec. 901.4.5.(1) (2)8�(3)) _
10) GRADE: Fire apparatus access roadway grades shall not exceed an average grade of 10 percent with a maximum grade of 15
percent for lengths of no more than 200 feet. (UFC Sec.9022.2.6). Intersections and tumarounds shall be level(maximum 5%}
w'rth the exception of crowning for water run-off.
�
File Number
�1) PAINTED CURBS: Fire apparatus access roadway curbs shall be painted yellow and marked"NO PARKING FIRE LANE"at
�each 25 feet. Lettering shall have a stroke of not less than one inch wide by six inches high.{UFC Sec. 901.4.5.2)
�2) COMMERCIAL BUILDINGS-MINIMUM NUMBER OF FIRE HYDRANTS: The minimum number of fire hydrants for a building
shall be based on the required fire flow p�or to giving any credits for fire protection systems. There shall not be less than one(t)
fire hydrant for the first 2,000 gallons per minute(GPM)required fi�e flow and one(1)additional fire hydrant for each 1,000 GPM
or portion thereof over 2.000 GPM. Fire hydrants shall be evenly spaced around the building and their locations shall be
, /approved by the Chief. (UFC Sec. 903.4.2.1�
V13) COMMERCIAL BUILDINGS-FIRE HYDRANTS• No portion ot the exterior of a commercial building shal!be located more than
250 feet from a tire hydrant when measured in an approved manner around the outside of the building and along an approved fire
appatatus access roadway. {UFC Sec. 903.4.2.1}
14) SINGLE FAMILY DWELUNGS-FIRE HYDRANTS• Fire hydrants for single family dwellings and duplexes shall be placed at
each intersection. Intermediate fire hydrants are required if any portion of a structure exceeds 500 feet from a hydrant as
measured in an approved man�er around the outside of the structure and along approved fire apparatus access roadways.
Placement of additional fire hydrants shall be as approved by the Chief. (UFC Sec. 903.4.2.2)
15) FIRE HYDRANT DISTANCE FROM AN ACCESS ROAD: Fire hydrants shall not be located more than 15 feet from an approved
fire apparatus access roadway. (UFC Sec.903.4.2.4)
16) F1RE HYDRANT/FlRE DEPARTMENT CONNECTION• A fire hydrant shall be located within 70 feet of a fire department•
connection(FDC). Fre hydrants and FOC's shall be located on the same side of the fire apparatus access roadway. (UFC Sec.
903.4.2.5) FDC locations shall be as approved by the Chief.(1996 Oregon Structural Specialty Code, Sec. 904.1.1)
17) FIRE dE�ARTMENT CONNECTIONS ON BUILDINGS• Fre department connections shall not be located on the building that s
�eing p�otected.(UFC Sec. 903.4.2.5)
18) COMMERCIAL BUILDINGS-REOUIRED FlRE FLOW The required fire flow for the building shall not exceed 3,000 gallons per
minute(GPM)or the available GPM in the water delivery system at 20 psi. A worksheet for calculating the required fire flow is
availabte hom the Fre Marshal's office.(UFC Sec.903.3)
19) SINGLE FAMILY DWELLINGS-REOUIRED FIRE FLOW• The minimum available fire Now for single family dwellings and
duplexes shall be 1,000 gallons per minute. If the structure(s)are 3,600 square feet or larger,the required fire flow shall be
determined according to UFC Appendix Table A-IIt-A-1.(UFC Appendix III-A,Sec. 5)
20) RURAL BUILDINGS-REGIUIRED FIRE FLOW: Required fire flow for rural buildings shall be calculated in accordance with
Na6onal Fre Protection Association Standard 1231. Please contact the Fre Marshal's office for special help and other
requirements that will apply.(UFC Sec.903.3)
�21) ACCESS AND FtREFIGHTING WATER SUPPLY DURING CONSTRUCTION• Approved fire apparatus access roadways and
fire fighting water supplies shall be insialled and operational pnor to any other construction on the site or subdivision. (UFC Sec.
8704)
22) KNOX BOX: A Knox Box for building access is required for this building. Please coniact the Fre Marshal's Office for an
application and instructions regarding installation and placemen�
23) REOUIRED INSPECTIONS: Please contact the Fre Marshal's office at the appropriate times for inspection of the following:
�2a) �ft c ,' �e� �- � $�.�.-rg � r,�v�
c� � � v r.� �
t—t � ,.�
� , '—
v c—Y. ,,,�
_2s�
cc: �'APPLICANT ❑ PIANNING DEPT �UILDING DEPT
P1an Reviewer Signat e "�
REQUEST FOR COMMENTS CITY OF TIGARD
R�CEIVED PLANNING Community�UeveCopment
S�tapirtgA�BetterCommunity
DATE: May 21,1991 J U N 0 3 1997
T0: Brian Moore,P&E ��T�
FROM: Ciql of Tigard Planning Division STAFF CONTACT: William D'Andrea[x3151
Phone:[5031639-4fl1 fax:[50316847297
RE:
CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT[CUPI 97-0006/YARIANCE[VARI 97-0004
➢ TNE RITE CENTER Q
A request for the following development applications: 1) Conditional Use approval to allow the construction of a 36-
bed homeless facility; 2) Variance request to allow 10 parking spaces where 14 spaces are required; and 3)
Variance request to allow an 8-foot side yard building setback whereas, 10 feet is required. LOCATION: 11070
and 11130 SW Greensburg Road; WCTM 1S1 35CA, Tax Lot 2500 and 2600. Eastern terminus of SW
Greensburg Road and SW Tiedeman Avenue. ZONE: Residential, 12 Units Per Acre; R-12. The R-12 zone
allows single-family attached/detached residential units, multiple-family residential units, residential care facilities,
mobile home parks and subdivision, public support services, family day care, home occupation, temporary use,
residential fuel tank, and accessory structures, among other uses. APPLICABLE REVIEW CRITERIA:
Community Development Code Sections 18.54.050, 18.100, 18.102, 18.106, 18.108, 18.130 and 18.164.
Attached is the Site Plan, Vicinity Map and Applicant's Statement for your review. From information supplied by
various departments and agencies and from other information available to our staff, a report and recommendation will
be prepared and a decision will be rendered on the proposal in the near future. If you wish to comment on this
application, WE NEED YOUR COMMENTS BACK BY: Monday - June 2, 1997. You may use the space provided
below or attach a separate letter to return your comments. If you are unable to res o�nd bv the above date, please
phone the staff contact noted above with your comments and confirm your comments in writing as soon as possible. If
you have any questions, contact the Tigard Planning Division, 13125 SW Hall Boulevard, Tigard, OR 97223.
PLEASE CHECK THE FOLLOWING ITEMS THAT APPLY:
_ We have reviewed the proposal and have no objections to it.
_ Please contact of our office.
_ Please refer to the enclosed letter.
_ Written comments provided below:
(���e p�re r�fo���nfo��n�Name of Person[sl Commendng: �--��� ��
Phone Number[sL• ��tv - �3S
CUP 97-OOOG THE RITE CENTER PROPOSAL/REQUEST FOR COMMENTS
�
. REQUEST FOR COMMEHTS CITY OF TIGARD
Community�DeveCopment
� RECEIVED PLA(VNfNG SkapingA Better Community
DATE: May 21,1991 MAY 2 7 1997
T0: lohn Roy,Properql Mana9er .Cs�' CITY OF T
►GARD
FROM: City of Tigard Planning Divi n STAFF CONTACT: William D'Andrea[x3151
Phone:[5031639-4171 Fax:(5031684-1297
RE:
CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT[CUPI 91-0006/VARIANCE[VARI 91-0004
➢ THE RITE CENTER Q
A request for the following development applications: 1) Conditional Use approval to allow the construction of a 36-
bed homeless facility; 2) Variance request to allow 10 parking spaces where 14 spaces are required; and 3)
Variance request to allow an 8-foot side yard building setback whereas, 10 feet is required. LOCATION: 11070
and 11130 SW Greensburg Road; WCTM 1S1 35CA, Tax Lot 2500 and 2600. Eastern terminus of SW
Greensburg Road and SW Tiedeman Avenue. ZONE: Residential, 12 Units Per Acre; R-12. The R-12 zone
allows single-family attached/detached residential units, multiple-family residential units, residential care facilities,
mobile home parks and subdivision, public support services, family day care, home occupation, temporary use,
residential fuel tank, and accessory structures, among other uses. APPLICABLE REVIEW CRITERIA:
Community Development Code Sections 18.54.050, 18.100, 18.102, 18.106, 18.108, 18.130 and 18.164.
Attached is the Site Plan, Vicinity Map and Applicant's Statement for your review. From information supplied by
various departments and agencies and from other information available to our staff, a report and recommendation will
be prepared and a decision will be rendered on the proposal in the near future. If you wish to comment on this
application, WE NEED YOUR COMMENTS BACK BY: Monday - June 2 1997. You may use the space provided
below or attach a separate letter to return your comments. If you are unable to respond by the above date, please
phone the staff contact noted above with your comments and confirm your comments in writing as soon as possible. If
you have any questions, contact the Tigard Planning Division, 13125 SW Hall Boulevard, Tigard, OR 97223.
PLEASE CHECK THE FOLLOWING ITEMS THAT APPLY:
_ We have reviewed the proposal and have no objections to it.
_ Please contact of our office.
_ Please refer to the enclosed letter.
Written comments provided below:
D � �.-- '
+ �
�,C/' .i�"'(,(.' /�i'� . �... -�;_.' �'��r�=6� ��'�° I1�/�? `�J-f C�r^vNL �i t7b.[�u 64�- �-t<3�'i l I'±/� .��'
��' -s-i°{-�v � Orl� �i!�� l n��rrs�,.� (",-.,c�C�1�i l�r--�,►.�r��-f� �S,>vv v,y j S.z sa.�.-7�
..�
�
D, t���� �' � �,4 ��, . � ,�
� (rn��e p�r�fo��►�tnfo��n�Name of Person[sl Commendng:
Phone Numder[sl:
CUP 97-0006 � THE RITE CENTER PROPOSAUREQUEST FOR COMMENTS
►
��.
, REQUEST FOR COMMENTS CITY OF TIGARD
Community�DeveCopment
RECEIVED PLANNING S(apingA BetterCommunity
DATE: MaY Z1,1991
MAY 2 3 1997
T0: David Scoa Building Official
CITY OF TIGARD
FROM: City of Ti9ard Planning Diuision STAFF CONTACT: William D'Andrea[x3151
Phone:[5031639-4171 Fax:[5031684-7297
RE:
CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT[CUPI 97-0006/YARIANCE[VARI 91-0004
➢ THE RITE CENTER Q
A request for the following development applications: 1) Conditional Use approval to allow the construction of a 36-
bed homeless facility; 2) Variance request to allow 10 parking spaces where 14 spaces are required; and 3)
Variance request to allow an 8-foot side yard building setback whereas, 10 feet is required. LOCATION: 11070
and 11130 SW Greensburg Road; WCTM 1S1 35CA, Tax Lot 2500 and 2600. Eastern terminus of SW
�Greensburg Road and SW Tiedeman Avenue. ZONE: Residential, 12 Units Per Acre; R-12. The R-12 zone
allows single-family attached/detached residential units, multiple-family residential units, residential care facilities,
� mobile home parks and subdivision, public support services, family day care, home occupation, temporary use,
residential fuel tank, and accessory structures, among other uses. APPLICABLE REVIEW CRITERIA:
Community Development Code Sections 18.54.050, 18.100, 18.102, 18.106, 18.108, 18.130 and 18.164.
Attached is the Site Plan, Vicinity Map and Applicant's Statement for your review. From information supplied by
various departments and agencies and from other information available to our staff, a report and recommendation will
be prepared and a decision will be rendered on the proposal in the near future. If you wish to comment on this
application, WE NEED YOUR COMMENTS BACK BY: Monday - June 2, 1997. You may use the space provided
below or attach a separate letter to return your comments. If you are unable to respond by the above date, please
phone the staff contact noted above with your comments and confirm your comments in writing as soon as possible. If
you have any questions, contact the Tigard Planning Division, 13125 SW Hall Boulevard, Tigard, OR 97223.
PLEASE CHECK THE FOLLOWING ITEMS THAT APPLY:
_ We have reviewed the proposal and have no objections to it.
Please contact of our office.
Please refer to the enclosed letter.
� Written comments provided below:
�d�++i.'� �1r��. i'v)e/ a y1f.� f s'�^ vl/ a, r�l ��J � v;. � S'�i l �rr /!r� ��f � s.
�:.�—�—� '� � 3 , ��9 Y� n 1: l!? f �� � �-i n. f"J �?s'c'r � �� � �-C a y
�h 7� � �� v �,-�
(��e p�e t�fo���nfo�t�n)Name of Person[sl Commentlng: � ✓
i ..1-,,^
� Phone Number[sl: % ,� �
CUP 97-OOOG THE RITE CENTER PROPOSAUREQUEST FOR COMMENTS
�
. REQUEST FOR COMMENTS CITY OF TIGARD
�'ommunity�I�eveCopment
RECEIVED PLANNING ShapingA�etter Community
DATE: M8y 21,1991 MAY 2 2 1997
T0: Michael Miller,Operations Manager CITYOFT�GARD
FROM: City of Tigard Planning Diuision STAFF CONTACT: William D'Andrea[x3151
Phane:[5031639�4171 Fax:[503]6847291
RE:
� CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT[CUPI 91-0006/VARIANCE[VARI 91-0004
➢ TNE RITE CENTER Q
A request for the following development applications: 1) Conditional Use approval to allow the construction of a 36-
bed homeless facility; 2) Variance request to allow 10 parking spaces where 14 spaces are required; and 3)
Variance request to allow an 8-foot side yard building setback whereas, 10 feet is required. LOCATION: 11070
and 11130 SW Greensburg Road; WCTM 1 S1 35CA, Tax Lot 2500 and 2600. Eastern terminus of SW
Greensburg Road and SW Tiedeman Avenue. ZONE: Residential, 12 Units Per Acre; R-12. The R-12 zone
allows single-family attached/detached residential units, multiple-family residential units, residential care facilities,
mobile home parks and subdivision, public support services, family day care, home occupation, temporary use,
residential fuel tank, and accessory structures, among other uses. APPLICABLE REVIEW CRITERIA:
Community Development Code Sections 18.54.050, 18.100, 18.102, 18.106, 18.108, 18.130 and 18.164.
Attached is the Site Plan, Vicinity Map and Applicant's Statement for your review. From information supplied by
various departments and agencies and from other information available to our staff, a report and recommendation will
be prepared and a decision will be rendered on the proposal in the near future. If you wish to comment on this
application, WE NEED YOUR COMMENTS BACK BY: Monday - June 2, 1997. You may use the space provided
below or attach a separate letter to return your comments. If you are unable to respond by the above date, please
phone the staff contact noted above with your comments and confirm your comments in writing as soon as possible. If
you have any questions, contact the Tigard Planning Division, 13125 SW Hall Boulevard, Tigard, OR 97223.
PLEASE CHECK THE FOLLOWING ITEMS THAT APPLY:
_ We have reviewed the proposal and have no objections to it.
_ Please contact of our office.
_ Please refer to the enclosed letter.
_ Written comments provided below:
/�IITS/DE l�l� 6u/L ,�A 7�2.L'�/IY/C�E �E.p, PGE�E �•DN7'�4G7' TAL.4 T i�! 1/iOGi.b�'f ln/AT�'1Z
�iS7iLC:7' `�'�, L�DMMEN7-S'
(�lease pravi�fe tke folCawing infornration�Name of Person[sl Cammentlng:
/' ✓
Phone NumdeHsl: ��q�
CUP 97-0006 THE RITE CENTER PROPOSAUREQUEST FOR COMMENTS
. , RECEIVED PLANNING REQUEST FOR COMMENTS CITY OF TIGARD
. .�U N � 4 �997 — _ . ..__.__ _.._. ;_- ----..----- Community�Development
, • , ,� � �,� I� `J J �: Shaping A Better Community
,i �I i�� u u ;
DAiE: Mey 21,199�ITY OF TIGARO �: � MAY � � 1997 �
;�
,
T0: lulia Huffman,USA/SWM Program ��
�
FROM: Ciql of Tigard Planning Division STAFF CONTACT: Ylfilliam D'Andrea[x3151
Phone:[5031639�1�1 Fax:[50316847297
RE:
CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT(CUPI 97-0006/VARIANCE[VARI 97-0004
➢ TNE RITE CENTER Q
A request for the following development applications: 1) Conditional Use approval to allow the construction of a 36-
bed homeless facility; 2) Variance request to allow 10 parking spaces where 14 spaces are required; and 3)
Variance request to allow an 8-foot side yard building setback whereas, 10 feet is requiretl. LOCATION: 11070
and 11130 SW Greensburg Road; WCTM 1S1 35CA, Tax Lot 2500 and 2600. Eastern terminus of SW
Greensburg Road and SW Tiedeman Avenue. ZONE: Residential, 12 Units Per Acre; R-12. The R-12 zone
allows single-family attached/detached residential units, multiple-family residential units, residential care facilities,
mobile home parks and subdivision, public support services, family day care, home occupation, temporary use,
residential fuel tank, and accessory structures, among other uses. APPLICABLE REVIEW CRITERIA:
Community Development Code Sections 18.54.050, 18.100, 18.102, 18.106, 18.108, 18.130 and 18.164.
Attached is the Site Plan, Vicinity Map and Applicant's Statement for your review. From information supplied by
various departments and agencies and from other information available to our staff, a report and recommendation will
be prepared and a decision will be rendered on the proposal in the near future. If you wish to comment on this
application, WE NEED YOUR COMMENTS BACK BY: Monday - June 2, 1997. You may use the space provided
below or attach a separate letter to return your comments. If you are unable to res op nd by the above date, please
phone the staff contact noted above with your comments and confirm your comments in writing as soon as possible. If
you have any questions, contact the Tigard Planning Division, 13125 SW Hall Boulevard, Tigard, OR 97223.
PLEASE CHECK THE FOLLOWING li'EMS THAT APPLY:
_ We have reviewed the proposal and have no objections to it.
Please contact of our office.
� Please refer to the enclosed letter.
_ Written comments provided below:
. (��e p�e t�fo���nfo�t�n�Mame of Person[sl Commentlng• _ �
Phone Numbertsl: ��4 - � b � g-
CUP 97-0006 THE RITE CENTER PROPOSAL/RE�UEST FOR COMMENTS
� •� ;�
' �CA���
� _
UNIFIED SEWERAGE AGENCY OF WASHINGTON COUNTY
RECEIVED PLANNIN(3
MEMORANDUM
JUN 0 4 1997
DATE: June 3, 1997 CITY OF TI�A�
TO: William D'Andrea, City of Tigard
FROM: Julia Huffman, USA ��--
SUBJECT: The Rite Center, CUP 97-0006, VAR 97-0004
SANITARY SEWER
The development should be provided with a means of disposal for sanitary sewer. The means of
disposal should be in accordance with R&O 96-44(Unified Sewerage Agency's Construction Design
Standards, July 1996 edition). Engineer should verify that public sanitary sewer is available to
uphill adjacent properties, or extend service as required by R&O 96-44.
STORM SEWER
The development should have access to public storm sewer. Engineer should verify that public
storm sewer is available to uphill adjacent properties, or extend storm service as required by R&O
96-44. Hydraulic and hydrological analysis of storm conveyance system is necessary. If downstream
storm conveyance does not have the capacity to convey the volume during a 25-year, 24-hour storm
event, the applicant is responsible for mitigating the flow.
WATER QUALITY
Developer should provide a water quality facility to treat the new impervious surface being
constructed as part of this development.
:is
155 North First Avenue, Suite 270,MS 10 Phone:503/648-86
21
Hillsboro,Oregon 97124 FAX:503/640-3525
/
f
TUALATIN VALLEY FIRE & RESCUE
� FIRE PREVENTION
4755 S.W.Griffith Drive . P.O.Box 4755 . Beaverton,OR 97076 . (503)526-2469 . FAX 526-2538
RECEIVED PLANNING
June 4, 1997
JUN 11 1997
Will D'Andrea CITYO�S�
City of Tigard Planning Division
13125 S.W. Hall Blvd.
Tigard, Oregon 97223
Re: The Rite Center
11070 & 11130 S.W. Greenburg Rd.
CUP 97-0006
File Number: 1558-97
Dear Will:
This is a Fire and Life Safety Plan Review and is based on the 1994 editions of the
Uniform Fire Code (UFC) and those sections of the Uniform Building Code (UBC) and
Uniform Mechanical Code (UMC) specifically referencing the fire department, and other
local ordinances and regulations.
Plans for the above noted project are not approved. Please address the following items
and resubmit plans to this office for review and approval.
Access roads shall be within 150 feet of all portions of the exterior wall of the first story
of the building as measured by an approved route around the exterior of the building. An
approved turnaround is required if the remaining distance to an approved intersecting
roadway, as measured along the fire apparatus access road, is greaier ti�an i 50 feet. (UFC
Sec. 902.2.1)
Fire apparatus access roads shall be of an all-weather surface that is easily distinguishable
from the surrounding area and is capable of supporting not less than 12,500 pounds point
load (wheel load) and 50,000 pounds live load (gross vehicle weight). (UFC Sec.
902.2.2.2)
�
"Working"Smoke Detectors Save Lives �`
�
Will D'Andrea
June 4, 1997
Page 2
The inside turning radius and outside turning radius shall not be less than 25 feet and 45
feet respectfully, as measured from the same center point. (UFC 902.2.2.3)
Where fire apparatus access roadways are not of sufficient width to accommodate parked
vehicles and maintain the minimum 20 foot wide unobstructed driving surface, "No
parking" signs shall be installed on one or both sides of the roadway and in turnarounds
as needed. (UFC Sec. 902.2.4). Signs shall read "NO PARKING- FIRE LANE - TOW
AWAY ZONE, ORS 98.810" and shall be installed with a clear space above ground level
of 7 feet. Signs shall be 12 inches wide by 18 inches high and shall have black or red
letters and border on a white background. (UFC Sec. 901.4.5(1)(2)&(3))
Fire apparatus access roadway curbs shall be painted yellow and marked "NO PARKING
FIRE LANE", at each 25 feet. Lettering shall have a stroke of not less than one inch wide
by six inches high. (UFC Sec. 901.4.5.2)
The minimum number of fire hydrants for a building shall be based on the required fire
flow prior to giving any credits for fire protection systems. There shall not be less than
one (1) fire hydrant for the first 2,000 gallons per minute (GPM) required fire flow and
one (1) additional fire hydrant for each 1,000 GPM or portion thereof over 2,000 GPM.
Fire hydrants shall be evenly spaced around the building and their locations shall be
approved by the Chief. (UFC Sec. 903.4.2.1)
No portion of the exterior of a commercial building shall be located more than 250 feet
from a fire hydrant when measured in an approved manner around the outside of the
building and along an approved fire apparatus access roadway. (UFC Sec. 903.4.2.1)
The required fire flow for the building shall not exceed 3,000 gallons per minute (GPM)
or the available GPM in the water delivery system at 20 psi. A worksheet for calculating
the required fire flow is available from the Fire Marshal's office. (UFC Sec. 903.3)
Approved fire apparatus access roadways and fire fighting water supplies shall be
installed and operational prior to any other construction on the site or subdivision. (UFC
Sec. 8704)
.
,
Will D'Andrea
June 4, 1997
Page 3
The fire district would oppose the variance on reduction of parking. Illegally parked
vehicles cause access problems during fire fighting.
If I can be of any further assistance to you, please feel free to contact me at 526-2469
referring to the above noted file number.
Sincerely,
Gene Birchill, DFM
Plans Examiner
GB:kw
McKeever/Morris, Inc.
722 SW 2"d Ave., Suite 400
Portland, OR 97204
r
,.�
REQUEST FOR COMMENTS CITY OF TIGARD
Community�UeveCopment
_ ha ingA BetterCommunity
RECENED NING
DATE: Mey 21,1991
T0: Tigard Police Depardnent-Cnme Preventlon Oificer �
JUN 11 199
CR1f OFTICARQ'
FROM: Cii�of Tigard Planning D"nrision STAFF CONTACT William D'Andrea ��151
Ph�ne:[5031639 1 Fax:[5031684-7297
RE:
CONDITIOMAL USE PERMIT[CUPI 97-0006/VARIANCE[VARI 91-0004
➢ TNE RITE CENTER Q
A request for the following development applications: 1) Conditional Use approval to allow the construction of a 36-
bed homeless facility; 2) Variance request to allow 10 parking spaces where 14 spaces are required; and 3)
Variance request to allow an 8-foot side yard building setback whereas, 10 feet is required. LOCATION: 11070
and 11130 SW Greensburg Road; WCTM 1 S1 35CA, Tax Lot 2500 and 2600. Eastern terminus of SW
Greensburg Road and SW Tiedeman Avenue. ZONE: Residential, 12 Units Per Acre; R-12. The R-12 zone
allows single-family attached/detached residential units, multiple-family residential units, residential care facilities,
mobile home parks and subdivision, public support services, family day care, home occupation, temporary use,
residential fuel tank, and accessory structures, among other uses. APPLICABLE REVIEW CRITERIA:
Community Development Code Sections 18.54.050, 18.100, 18.102, 18.106, 18.108, 18.130 and 18.164.
Attached is the Site Plan, Vicinity Map and Applicant's Statement for your review. From information supplied by
various departments and agencies and from other information available to our staff, a report and recommendation will
be prepared and a decision will be rendered on the proposal in the near future. If you wish to comment on this
application, WE NEED YOUR COMMENTS BACK BY: Monday - June 2, 1997. You may use the space provided
below or attach a separate letter to return your comments. If vou are unable to respond by the above date, please
phone the staff contact noted above with your comments and confirm your comments in writing as soon as possible. If
you have any questions, contact the Tigard Planning Division, 13125 SW Hall Boulevard, Tigard, OR 97223.
PLEASE CHECK THE FOLLOWING ITEMS THAT APPLY:
;�--�We have reviewed the proposal and have no objections to it.
_ Please contact of our office.
_ Please refer to the enclosed letter.
_ Written comments provided below:
(���e p�ce the fo���nfo�t�n)Name of Person[sl Commendng: -�� � � � �
Phone Number[sl:
CllP 97-0006 THE RITE CENTER PROPOSAUREQUEST FOR COMMENTS
I
�
McKeever/Morris, Inc.
209 S.W. Oak Street,Suite 200
Portland, Oregon 97204 ,
503.228.7352
fax 503.228.7365
June 23, 1997
Gene Birchill
Tualatin Valley Fire and Rescue
4755 SW Grif�th Drive, PO Box 4755
Beaverton, Oregon 97076
RE: RITE Center CUP Plan Review
Your File No.: 1558-97
Dear Gene:
Thank you for taking the time on June 19, I997 to discuss your June 4 comments to the
Tigard Planning regarding the captioned CUP.To summarize the key outGOmes:
1. With respect to the 150 foot emergency access requirement,TVFR will be satisfied
by a letter of agreement from the neighboring condominium project allowing emergency
vehicle access and holding the District harnzless for any damages. The proposed RITE
Center parking lot will not have to be redesigned. Gates will be added at both ends of
the children's playground to allow access by firefighters and emergency personnel.
This allowance would be effective only for the first phase of the RITE Center. When
the second phase is constructed other options may be required.
We understand that TVFR would still prefer a sprinkler system in Phase 1 also and we
will be attempting to obtain donated materials to make this economically feasible. We
hope to have Chief Johnson's help in this effort.
2. With respect to your comments on the parking variance, we understand your
objection is withdrawn, subject to the stripping and posting requirements you outlined,
and a TVFR review of the RTTE Center's written policies for their residents.
Again, thank you for your assistance in furthering this important project.
Sincerely,
�
James H. Rapp ,
Senior Manager
cc: Will D'Andrea, Tigard Planning
Plannin�m BroWri, IOS
Design �id Scott, Scott Architects
Public Involvement
Pmject Managemenr
�
_; r,.,:_�
'�<.
��, .
, �° � ; -
.��m�� f:
i ` �
� . ..
Y._
�+�',
�. �..
�ti
W.:;..
l'.::�
- � COMMUNITY NEWSPAPERS, INC• Le98,
P.O. BOX 370 PHONE(503}684-�360
Notice TT 8 8 6 7
BEAVERTON,OAEGON 97075
Legal Notice Advertising
• ❑ Tearsheet Notice �� � � � V E D
•�ity of Tigard JUL 0 2 1997
1312 5 SW Ha 11 B lvd. • ❑ Duplicate Affidavit
•Tigard,Oregon 97223 �� T��, ,..-.
��_..
•
'Accounts Payable __ --- -
The following will be considered by the Tigard Hearings Officer on Mon-
day,July 7, 1997 at 7:00 P.M., at Tigard Civic Center—Town Hall,
13125 SW Hall Boulevard,Tigard,Oregon.Both public,oral and written
AFFIDAVIT OF PUBLICATION testimony is invited.The public hearing on this matter will be conducted
in accordance with the rules of Chapter 18.32 of the Tigard Municipal
STATE OF OREGON, ) Code,and rules and procedures of the Hearings Officer.Fa�lure to raise an
COUNTY OF WASHINGTON, )SS' issue in person or by letter accompanied by statements or evidence suffi-
cient to allow the hearings authority and all parties to respond precludes
I, g
' "; ' being first duly sworn, depose and gTiQard Tualatins�T�mes DevelopmentdCode ortComprehe sive�Plan atfwhich a omment�is
r r Director, or his principal clerk, of the
a newspaper of general circulation as defined in ORS 193�Ohe maytbe obtaunedafro P the Plann ngaDivision atu13125 SW H Il
T and 193.020; published at Ti ard
Boulevard,Tigard,Oregon 97223 or by calling(503)639-4171.
'r'�'°`; aforesaid count and state; t�Ptp�Pr
�- �� ; HP�arinc� Rite PUBLIC HEARING:
�� y� of which is hereto annexed, was published m the CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT(CUP)97-0006/
. :,;��;� � a printed copY
�t;` entire issue of said newspaper for ONE successive and VAR 97-0004
d: _. THE RITE CENTER ,
r°�=� A request for the following development applications: 1)Conditional Use
$'- consecutive in the following issues:
' �;� _ approval to allow the construction of a 36-bed homeless facility; 2) I
June 26 ,19 97 Var�ance request to allow 10 parking spaces where 14 spaces are required; �i
and 3) Var►ance request to allow an 8-foot side yard building setback
whereas 10 feet is required.LOCATION: 11070 and 11130 SW Green-
� burg Road; WCTM 1S1 35CA,Tax lot 2500 and 2600. Eastern terminus
of SW Greenburg Road and SW Tiedeman Avenue. ZONE: Residential,
: '�*. 12 Units Per Acre; R-12. The R-12 zone allows single-family at-
r.: .: tached/detached residential units, multiple-family residential units,
:r:. .
� �r�L a
Subscribed and sworn to b ore me this�n T �� � .� n f 7u n e, 19 9 7 Por tservices,rfamily day a�e,�home occupaUon,temp�orarynu eu residen-
' �,, � tial fuel tank,and accessory structures,among other uses.APPLICABLE
g:� REVIEW CRITERIA: Community Development Code Sections
Nota blic for Oregon � 18.54.050, 18.100, 18.102, 18.106, 18.108, 18.120, 18.130, 18.134,
18.150 and 18.164.
My Commission Expires: � \ i i (
AFFIDAVIT ` `-� �
\ , � .�...,�.�r�n 'i i.
\ �\ i
�.�:;. \ ►
��-� � ' , i I �
. \, �, �
� �
\ ��i us ��c�; � � �
) P�IRCElS�'^>� � �
\ � �
; ` , � , � I
` ` ; /
� �
� �� �
TT8867—Publish June 26,1997. �
�i
I
�••,���• ��� ��v��viv v �d U2it/�I1 �O Jlll�
. � -
,' . . — -
� f � �
� � � .
� �;� �
� ��� :� � � � .
� � ry�- � -�:. J,.� . �
} Q r . , � eo
������ � � ---. _ . � Z �
� r � �-� ' ' . �
� � � � � ,/'� � � �
. eo4=aaY�� � 1 . . . (,(J a.
. • ' ; j., : � � � �
� i i � V
�� ` � i _ � ' .
� _ �' , . L... ' .
� '' W � ' � � � `�— I
3' �� � . �� � .
� ' -`' .
�� � , o .
�� , _ � O � _ � •, .
— �vq�e�►�r � � � • . ( � �
' ! '.� i-- ' � �
. � �°.. � ' -. � �. � �
,e � _ �_� �,. . p,. .�
�r' �' .r� ;��� � „ �_. •� � , W �,
O , , . . •' , O : r � _
• ••. � . I_ � °• �'`.`v•� , �
/, . . O � jA
l �
i ' ` � � .• �
/ .�. �p��ii �
; o � ; � � � � .p
::�; � ,.'" ~ .� � � C� ,
� _ `.`� . O � h
..��' . • ,,.9 +- ' . , , "�':�
._
�
nMAa 4pR4�un M4
W1h�[�M\665RITE\BIAW(.UVG DATE�4PR 10,I997 iIME'2'I� PM lTSC4�E'� �8
FlI�/Plot de1�+ ---/---
—--1 �u ,
� __.� - - _ � d-
� I � � —
� i I
O � � O � a �
� i I � — �
-- m •
� ( r
\ g m 'I
-� Z - � � �� .���
_ ' / � � � i�, �i
m �; ,�
< � � _ - a �;�.��;
D � � 'ji
� r , � � li�:
� _ ; , 1 -
o � �i� -
z � � 1
I
�' �.
�
o ,�� �-,,� �
;� ���„�. � .
,
�, = 1�,,�- ���, �
;I � �
� �j; — �, ; —_
'� ,, �i =_- �F �;
'I t �
�`.'�' a
I�
;� ,ii �- � — —
�
— � �,I�� � I
� j � ; --- �r � � �
;, � _ ,
._ �-k__ � I I
�' , — G �
� ',� �
�,I � i
; O � � i
- - -- -► �� --�O ��
� i ,I = _
��� ��
I��II . � _ i
� I' � � '
� � ��
. �
f�i: �
i � , # ��.
i � , -- , fi '_?
� ---, O
�
� � � � ,
.i � i � D I
I � I � � N I
� � I � I
�------� i �
��-----1 D i
-� i
. � � I
� I
I�
�,.;�=B�na�O��nr.wN— r
rn^
r�Dm�y�Dg����� u'
D='D ��"OD D D (n -
�{�l-0 �:nTli51+ _:� . —►
°' ��E�f�O��: u� �
��0�=__^�..�'D D
�AN�'��D����m
o � ��,�L,�S
� ��� �
�N N I
�
Job No. y.e�
��'-"-� THE RITE CENTER ,,,�
Sheet No. A 8 0, � Interfaith Outreach Services
TIGARD, OREGON
xmvn�.,4�.s.r.ao9
�i..{oes�
9ea.s+c.oe�o
,
,,. __ __
y
�
BLVD
,
�
,
,
,, C� �
� �
�� �
', C�
�
I �
� �
� .-
��� �
�
�
' --L C�
� _
�
�
� C�
� �
� � --
�
� �
NORTH p
�
._
��� U
�
�
V'icinity Map CUP 97-0006/VAR 96-0004
��•��°� N Notification Map
� __ _
,
, REQUEST FOR COMMENTS CITY OF TIGARD
Community�I�eveCopment
� ShapingA BetterCommunity
DATE: May Y1,1991
T0: PER ATTACHED
FROM: Cit�of Tigard Planning Diuision STAF�CONTACT: William D'Andrea[x3151
Ph�na:[5031639�171 Fax:[5031684-7291
RE:
CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT[CUPI 97-0006/VARIANCE[VARI 97-0004
➢ TNE RITE CEHTER Q
A request for the following development applications: 1) Conditional Use approval to allow the construction of a 36-
bed homeless facility; 2) Variance request to allow 10 parking spaces where 14 spaces are required; and 3)
Variance request to allow an 8-foot side yard building setback whereas, 10 feet is required. LOCATION: 11070
.and 11130 SW Greensburg Road; WCTM 1S1 35CA, Tax Lot 2500 and 2600. Eastern terminus of SW
Greensburg Road and SW Tiedeman Avenue. ZONE: Residential, 12 Units Per Acre; R-12. The R-12 zone
allows single-family attached/detached residential units, multiple-family residential units, residential care facilities,
mobile home parks and subdivision, public support services, family day care, home occupation, temporary use,
residential fuel tank, and accessory structures, among other uses. APPLICABLE REVIEW CRITERIA:
Community Development Code Sections 18.54.050, 18.100, 18.102, 18.106, 18.108, 18.130 and 18.164.
Attached is the Site Plan, Vicinity Map and ApplicanYs Statement for your review. From information supplied by
various departments and agencies and from other information available to our staff, a report and recommendation will
be prepared and a decision will be rendered on the proposal in the near future. If you wish to comment on this
application, WE NEED YOUR COMMENTS BACK BY: Monday - June 2, 1997. You may use the space provided
below or attach a separate letter to return your comments. If you are unable to respond by the above date, please
phone the staff contact noted above with your comments and confirm your comments in writing as soon as possible. If
you have any questions, contact the Tigard Planning Division, 13125 SW Hall Boulevard, Tigard, OR 97223.
PLEASE CHECK THE FOLLOWING ITEMS THAT APPLY:
_ We have reviewed the proposal and have no objections to it.
_ Please contact of our office.
_ Please refer to the enclosed letter.
_ Written comments provided below:
(���e p�re rhe fo���nfo�t�on�Name of Person[sl Commentlng:
Phone Mumber[sl:
CUP 97-OOOG THE RITE CENTER PROPOSAUREQUEST FOR COMMENTS
. . ;�, . �. . -. . ,. �. . . . . ..�.+':_.j
� REQUEST FOR COMMENTS
NOTIFICATION LIST FOR IAND USE 8 DEYELOPMENT APPLICATIONS
.
CITArea: [C��tEl'(S1 (wl CITIZEM INYOLVEMENT TEAMS E�Place for reviewin library CR Book[sl
,
FILE NO[Sl.: ( � � i� �t��(� C�, FILE NAME[Sl: �I� l I r � � €�-,_t� ��
�.
CIIY OfFICES
ADVANCED PLANNING/Nadine Smith,ar��.gs�,.�o�_COMMUNITY DVLPMNT.DEPTJo�w�.n s<..�.aM��. �-'�OLICE DEPT./c��a,.V��orr.,
�BUILDING DIV./David Scott,a��a��9on��.� i/�NGINEERING DEPT./Brian Rager,Dvpmirt R�vwwEnpnsx r�iM1IATER DEPT./Michael Miller,oP«e��a�.M.�.�.�
_CITY ADMINISTRATION/Cathy Wheatley,City Recorder i�OPERATIONS DEPT./John Roy,a��,y M.M�., _OTHER
SPECIAL DISTRICTS
(,_�UALATIN VALLEY FIRE 8 RESCUE TUALATIN VALLEY WATER DISTRICT �/GNIFIED SEWERAGE AGENCY
Fire Marshall Administrative Office Julia Huffman/SWM Program
Washington County Fire District PO Box 745 155 N.First Street
(piace in pick-up box) Beaverton,OR 97075 Hillsboro,OR 97124
LOCAL AND STATE IURISDICTIONS
CITY OF BEAVERTON CITY OF TUALATIN OR.DEPT.OF FISH 8 WILDLIFE _OR.DIV.OF STATE LANDS
PO Box 4755 PlBnning Director 2501 SW First Avenue 775 Summer Street,NE
Beaverton,OR 97076 PO Box 369 PO Box 59 Salem,OR 97310-1337
Tualatin,OR 97062 Portland,OR 97207
Larry Conrad,seniorP�anner _OR.PUB.UTILITIES COMM.
_Mike Matteucci,r,e�nc�,w.coa.e METRO OR.DEPT.OF GEO.&MINERAL IND. 550 Capitol Street,NE
600 NE Grand Avenue 800 NE Oregon Street,Suite 5 Salem,OR 97310-1380
CITY OF DURHAM Portland,OR 97232-2736 Portland,OR 97232
City Manager US ARMY CORPS.OF ENG.
PO Box 23483 Paulette Allen,c�u,M.�.�m ca«eme�o� OR.DEPT.OF LAND CONSERV.B DVLP 333 SW First Avenue
Durham,OR 97281-3483 _Mel Huie,GreenspacesCoordinalor(CPA's20A's) 1175 Court Street,NE PO Box 2946
Salem,OR 97310-0590 Portland,OR 97208-2946
CITY OF KING CITY METRO AREA BOUNDARY COMMISSION
City Manager 800 NE Oregon Street OREGON DEPT.OF TRANS.(ODOT) WASHINGTON COUNTY
15300 SW 116th Avenue Building#16,Suite 540 Aeronautics Division Dept.of Land Use&Trans.
King City,OR 97224 Portland,OR 97232-2109 Attn: Tom Highland,Planning 155 N.First Avenue
3040 25th Street,SE Suite 350,MS 13
CITY OF LAKE OSWEGO OR.DEPT.OF ENERGY Salem,OR 97310 Hillsboro,OR 97124
Planning Director Bonneville Power Administration
PO Box 369 PO Box 3621 ODOT,REGION 1 Brent Curtis ccPa�S>
Lake Oswego,OR 97034 Routing TTRC-Attn: Renae Ferrera Sonya Kazen,Dvlpml.Rev.Coord. SCOtt Klfl9(CPA's)
Portland,OR 97208-3621 123 NW Flanders Mike Borreson ce���n
CITY OF PORTLAND Portland,OR 97209-4037 Jim Tice pcn�:>
David KnOwIeS,viannirq s�rea�o�r. OREGON,DEPT.OF ENVIRON.QUALITY Tom Harry�c��m ai.n�.�
Portland Building 106,Rm. 1002 811 SW Sixth Avenue ODOT,REGION 1-DISTRICT 2A _Phil Healy�c����P� a�>
1120 SW Fifth Avenue Portland,OR 97204 Jane Estes,Pem+n s�a.��
Portland,OR 97204 PO Box 25412
Portland,OR 97298-0412
UTILITY PROVIDERS AND SPECIAL AGENCIES
BURLINGTON NORTHERN R/R _METRO AREA COMMUNICATIONS SOUTHERN PACIFIC TRANS.CO.(R/R) I�TRI-MET TRANSIT DVLPMT.
Administrative Office Jason Hewitt Clifford C.Cabe,Construction Engineer Michael Kiser,Project Planner
1313 W. 11th Street Twin Oaks Technology Center 5424 SE McLoughlin Boulevard 710 NE Holladay Street
Vancouver,WA 98660-3000 1815 NW 169th Place,S-6020 PoRland,OR 97232 PoRland,OR 97232
Beaverton,OR 97006-4886
_COLUMBIA CABLE COMPANY TCI CABLEVISION OF OREGON US WEST COMMUNICATIONS
Craig Eyestone f W NATURAL GAS COMPANY Linda Peterson Pete Nelson
14200 SW Brigadoon Court Scott Palmer 3500 SW Bond Street 421 SW Oak Street
Beaverton,OR 97005 220 SW Second Avenue Portland,OR 97201 Portland,OR 97204
� Portland,OR 97209-3991
�/GENERAL TELEPHONE
Paul Koft,Engineering �ORTLAND GENERAL ELECTRIC COMPANY
MC: OR030546 Brian Moore
Tigard,OR 97281-3416 14655 SW Old Scholls Ferry Road
Beaverton,OR 97007 h:Vpatty\maslerslrfcnotice.mst 2-nnay-e�
f
AFFIDAVIT OF MAILING CRY Of TIOARD
Comneurtity�Developmrnt
Shapinglt�BetterCommunity
.s�A�o�o�Goar )
County of�tNashington )ss.
City of 7fgard )
I, Patl'iC1'L WIISf�rd, being first duly swom/affirm, on oath depose and say that I am an Administrative Specialist II for
the City of Tigard, Washington County, Oregon.
� That I served qOTICE Of (AMENDED ❑) PUBUC NEANIN6�0 � /i`%
�a.d..+..,.....r.► ��.r.o rrr.�hn�
{��11t�Mx MN�r}
0 City of Tigard Planning Director
� Tigard Hearings Officer
❑ Tigard Planning Commission
❑ Tigard City Council
❑ That I served tlOTICE OF (AMENDED �� DECISION FOR:
�..�.�....�.►
❑ City of Tigard Planning Directo�
❑ That I served NOTICE OF (AMENDED 0� FINAL ORDER FoR:
ceK......w,.n..e�.}
(CMet�rN�f�u I�a Mlhr}
0 City of Tigard Planning Director
0 Tigard Hearings Officer
❑ Tigard Planning Commission
� Tigard City Council
� That I served O1NER NOTICE Of f0&
A copy of the POBLIC BEARIN6 MOT10ElMOTICE,.�OF DECISIOM/Ii0T10E OF AMAL OBDEB/OTHEB NAl10E[Sl of which is attached,
marked Exhibit "A", as,mailed to eac named person(s) at the address(s) shown on the attached list(s), ��
E�Ipi�it"�,;pn the y of L 1997, and deposited in the United States Mail on the
� r'1 day of ' 1991.postage prepaid.
�VVI,m.
�ersoa that Prepared Modcel
�--�-_ , ,
Subscribed and sworn/affirmed before me on the �3 day of � , 19��
�
� ,,
OFFIGAL SEAL I �
DIANE M JELDERKS _ ��
NOTARY PUBLIC-OREGON MOTABT POBLlC Of 0 EG6N
COMMISSION NO.Oa6tc2
MY COMMISSION EXPIRES SEPTEMBER 07,t999 My Commissioo Expire� C�"/7
� ��
� RLE INF�_ � _
eas�� �lC � , ��• ^ 'L2�� eufwu�au /� C'�����-
LXH�B�T � CITY OF TIGARD
Community rDevefopmeni
S(apingA BetterCommunity
PUBLIC NEARING NOTICE
NOTICE IS HEREBY GIVEN THAT THE TIGARD HEARINGS OFFICER, AT A MEETING ON MONDAY.
JULY 7, 1997 AT� PM, IN THE TOWN HALL OF THE TIGARD CIVIC CENTER, 13125 SW HALL
BOULEVARD, TIGARD, OREGON 97223 WILL CONSIDER THE FOLLOWING APPLICATION:
FILE NO(S): CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT[CUPI 97-0006
VARIANCE NARI 97-0004
FILE TITLE: THE RITE CENTER
APPLICANT: Interfaith Outreach Services OWNER: Same
PO Box 230821
Tigard, OR 97281
REQUEST: A request for the following development applications: 1) Conditional Use approval
to allow the construction of a 36-bed homeless facility; 2) Variance request to allow
10 parking spaces where 14 spaces are required; and 3) Variance request to
allow an 8-foot side yard building setback whereas, 10 feet is required.
LOCATION: 11070 and 11130 SW Greenburg Road; WCTM 1 S1 35CA, Tax Lot 2500 and
2600. Eastern terminus of SW Greensburg Road and SW Tiedeman Avenue.
ZONE: Residential, 12 Units Per Acre; R-12. The R-12 zone allows single-family
attached/detached residential units, multiple-family residential units, residential
care facilities, mobile home parks and subdivision, public support services, family
day care, home occupation, temporary use, residential fuel tank, and accessory
structures, among other uses.
APPLICABLE
REVIEW
CRITERIA: Community Development Code Sections 18.54.050, 18.100, 18.102, 18.106,
18.108, 18.120, 18.130, 18.134, 18.150 and 18.164.
THE PUBLIC HEARING ON THIS MATTER WILL BE CONDUCTED IN ACCORDANCE WITH THE RULES OF CHAPTER
18.32 OF THE COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT CODE AND RULES OF PROCEDURE ADOPTED BY THE TIGARD CITY
COUNCIL AND AVAILABLE AT CITY HALL, OR RULES OF PROCEDURE SET FORTH IN CHAPTER 18.30.
ASSISTIVE LISTENING DEVICES ARE AVAILABLE FOR PERSONS WITH IMPAIRED HEARING. THE CITY WILL ALSO
ENDEAVOR TO ARRANGE FOR QUALIFIED SIGN LANGUAGE INTERPRETERS AND QUALIFIED BILINGUAL
INTERPRETERS UPON REQUEST. PLEASE CALL (503) 639-4171, EXT. 320 (VOICE) OR (503) 684-2772 (TDD -
TELECOMMUNICATIONS DEVICES FOR THE DEAF) NO LESS THAN ONE WEEK PRIOR TO THE HEARING TO MAKE
ARRANGEMENTS.
CUP 97-OOO6NAR 97-0004 THE RITE CENTER NOTICE OF 7/7197 PUBLIC HEARING
ONE WISHING TO PRESENT WRITTEN TESTIMONY ON THIS PROPOSED ACTION MAY DO SO IN WRITING
TO OR AT THE PUBLIC HEARING. ORAL TESTIMONY MAY BE PRESENTED AT THE PUBLIC HEARING. AT
UBLIC HEARING, THE HEARINGS OFFICER WILL RECEIVE A STAFF REPORT PRESENTATION FROM THE
CI1 PLANNER, OPEN THE PUBLIC HEARING, AND INVITE BOTH ORAL AND WRITTEN TESTIMONY. THE
HEARINGS OFFICER MAY CONTINUE THE PUBLIC HEARING TO ANOTHER MEETING TO OBTAIN ADDITIONAL
INFORMATION, OR CLOSE THE PUBLIC HEARING AND TAKE ACTION ON THE APPLICATION.
IF A PERSON SUBMITS EVIDENCE IN SUPPORT TO THE APPLICATION AFTER JUNE 16. 1997, ANY PARTY IS
ENTITLED TO REQUEST A CONTINUANCE OF THE HEARING. IF THERE IS NO CONTINUANCE GRANTED AT THE
HEARING, ANY PARTICIPANT IN THE HEARING MAY REQUEST THAT THE RECORD REMAIN OPEN FOR AT LEAST
SEVEN (7) DAYS AFTER THE HEARING. A REQUEST THAT THE RECORD REMAIN OPEN CAN BE MADE ONLY AT
THE FIRST EVIDENTIARY HEARING (ORS 197.763(6).
INCLUDED IN THIS NOTICE IS A LIST OF APPROVAL CRITERIA APPLICABLE TO THE REQUEST FROM THE TIGARD
COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT CODE AND THE TIGARD COMPREHENSIVE PLAN. APPROVAL OR DISAPPROVAL
OF THE REQUEST BY THE HEARINGS OFFICER WILL BE BASED UPON THESE CRITERIA AND THESE CRITERIA
ONLY. AT THE HEARING IT IS IMPORTANT THAT COMMENTS RELATING TO THE REQUEST PERTAIN
SPECIFICALLY TO THE APPLICABLE CRITERIA LISTED.
FAILURE TO RAISE AN ISSUE IN PERSON OR BY LETTER AT SOME POINT PRIOR TO THE CLOSE OF THE
HEARING ON THE REQUEST ACCOMPANIED BY STATEMENTS OR EVtDENCE SUFFICIENT TO ALLOW THE
HEARINGS AUTHORITY AND ALL PARTIES TO RESPOND PRECLUDES AN APPEAL, AND FAILURE TO SPECIFY
THE CRITERION FROM THE COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT CODE OR COMPREHENSIVE PLAN AT WHICH A
COMMENT IS DIRECTED PRECLUDES AN APPEAL TO THE LAND USE BOARD OF APPEALS BASED ON THAT
ISSUE.
ALL DOCUMENTS AND APPLICABLE CRITERIA IN THE ABOVE-NOTED FILE ARE AVAILABLE FOR INSPECTION AT
NO COST OR COPIES CAN BE OBTAINED FOR TWENTY-FIVE CENTS (25�) PER PAGE, OR THE CURRENT RATE
CHARGED FOR COPIES AT THE TIME OF THE REQUEST. AT LEAST SEVEN (7) DAYS PRIOR TO THE HEARING, A
COPY OF THE STAFF REPORT WILL BE AVAILABLE FOR INSPECTION AT NO COST, OR A COPY CAN BE
OBTAINED FOR TWENTY-FIVE CENTS (25C) PER PAGE, OR THE CURRENT RATE CHARGED FOR COPIES AT THE
TIME OF THE REQUEST.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION PLEASE CONTACT THE STAFF PLANNER WILLIAM D'ANDREA AT (503) 639-4171,
TIGARD CITY HALL, 13125 SW HALL BOULEVARD, TIGARD, OREGON 97223.
�
� w
�
I �
["11l SUBIECT ��
l
PARCELS-->
�
. � .
� �
CUP 97-0006NAR 97-0004 THE RITE CENTER NOTICE OF 7l7/97 PUBLIC HEARING
�LlP 9� -Oc�"Xoll/�� 9�-��i 7"/��r� C6N'T�E��- � �. 1 0�4�
1 S135CAY90208 1 S135CA-90206
AAZAD,ALI ACORD,JON 8 SUSAN M
11040 SW GREENBURG RD#208 10496 SE 98TH CT
TIGARD,OR 97223 PORTLAND,OR 97268
15135CA-90000 1S135CA-90359
ASH CREEK PARK CONDO ASH,JOLYNNE&MALCOLM L
UNIT OWNERS 73032 MAPLE LEAF CT
BY E AND V DEVELOPEMENT CO AURORA,OR 97002
4550 SW LOMBARD AVE
BEAVERTON,OR 97005
1S135CA-90346 1S135BD-01400
ATLAS,MARK BAGAN,JOHN P JR
11048 SW GREENBURG RD#346 10910 SW GREENBURG RD
TIGARD,OR 97224 TIGARD,OR 97223
1S135CA-90230 1S135CA-90207
BALDWIN,RICK J AND BECCHETTI,JOHN J AND MARY
PATTI ANNE 3300 WEBSTER ST
13817 SW BOXELDER OAKLAND,CA 95609
TIGARD,OR 97223
1S135CA-90138 1S135CA-90335
BECKER,RICHARD W& BICKFORD,HELEN SUE
PETERS,BEVEN D 11046 SW GREENBURG RD#335
7954 SW 48TH AVE TIGARD,OR 97223
PORTLAND,OR 97219
1 S 135CA-90140 1 S 7 35CA-90219
BYRNS,GEORGE F COFFELT,LOIS M
11048 SW GREENBURG RD#140 Go STEELE,JAMES D
TIGARD,OR 97223 1745 SW FILMONT
PORTLAND,OR 97225
1 S 135CA-90242 1 S 135CA-90104
COOPER,SCOTT GEORGE CRAVER,CYNTHIA LYNN
11048 SW GREENBURG RD#242 11040 SW GREENBURG RD#t04
TIGARD,OR 97223 TIGARD,OR 97223
1S135CA-90205 1S135CA-90255
DAVIS,EUGENE L AND DEPT OF VETS AFFAIRS F-50714
DAVIS,VIVIAN Go CRISWELL,CHARLES�&PHYL
DAVIS,CONNIE SUE PO BOX 642
9330 SW OAK ESTACADA,OR 97023
TIGARD,OR 97223
1S135CA-02800 1S135CA-90103
E&V DEVELOPMENT CO ELLIOT,RICHARD E
13095 SW HENRY 11040 SW GREENBURG RD#703
BEAVERTON,OR 97005 TIGARD,OR 97223
1S135CA-90150 7S135CA-90107
ERAKER,PATRICIA L FOREIGN MISSION FOUNDATION
PO BOX 94146 Go ROBERT SAIZ,CPA
FT STEILACOOM,WA 98494 12753 SW 68TH PKWY STE 220
TIGARD,OR 97224
c u� q�-�U/�`� g� -c�ru� r�+� �2rr� C6N r�� � P6, � o-F � �
1S135CA-90357 1S135CA-90149
FOREIGN MISSION FOUNDATION FOREIGN MISSION FOUNDATION
Go ROBERT SAIZ,CPA Go ENZOR,NORMAN RAY
12753 SW 68TH PKWY STE 220 11150 SW GREENBURG RD
TIGARD,OR 97224 UNIT 149
TIGARD,OR 97223
1S135CA-90256 1S135CA-90310
FOREIGN MISSION FOUNDATION GESME,PAMELA RUTH
cJo ROBERT SAIZ,CPA 4021 NE 22ND AVE
12753 SW 68TH PKWY STE 220 PORTLAND,OR 97212
TIGARD,OR 97224
.�'I 5135CA-90229 1 S 135CA-90324
GOVSTEIN,GENNADY&KIRA HARBECK,SALLY JEAN
14735 SW DAPHNE CT 11044 SW GREENBURG RD#324
BEAVERTON,OR 97007 TIGARD,OR 97223
/ .
/�
1S135CA-90128 1S135CA-90116
IHLI,PERRY JONES,JAN B
128 S 38TH ST 71044 SW GREENBURG RD#116
OMAHA,NB 68131 TIGARD,OR 97223
1S135CA-90334 15135CA-90253
KOFFEL,STEVEN ALLEN AND LAWHORN,RAYMOND T
ALISHA KAY 11150 SW GREENBURG RD#253
2253 NE 164TH AVE TIGARD,OR 97223
PORTLAND,OR 97230
1S135CA-90702 1S135CA-00700
LENKER,RICHARD LEE LILLY,EDWARD B
11040 SW GREENBURG RD#102 HOGAN,JOSEPH E
TIGARD,OR 97223 6919 N HODGE AV
PORTLAND,OR 97203
1S135CA-90152 1S135CA-90151
LUTE,STEVEN C MAEHREN,KEITH M
11150 SW GREENBURG RD 7855 SW OAK ST
TIGARD,OR 97223 TIGARD,OR 97223
1S135CA-90127 1S135CA-90125
MARSH,ALGER HERBERTAND MITCHELL,RONAL�P
GLORIA 14970 SW 109 AVENUE
2590 WARWICK 5T TIGARD,OR 97224
WEST LINN,OR 97068
1S135CA-90322 1S135CA-90323
MULROONEY,TIMOTHY D MURAWSKI,DANIEL J
11044 SW GREENBURG#322 11044 GREENBURG RD#323
TIGARD,OR 97223 TIGARD,OR 97223
1S135CA-90231 1S135CA-90311
OREGON DEPT OF VETERANS AFFAIR OREGON,STATE OF DEPT OF VETS
Go KAPUSTKA,STAN F AND ARLEN do WILLIAMS,DOROTHY ANN
12618 NW BARNES RD APT 6 13336 SW CHELSEA LOOP
PORTLAND,OR 97229 TIGARD,OR 97223
c uP ��ro/y%�-�e 9�—c� � �T� '�N r��'" C�6i . 3 of'4)
1 S 135CA-90232 1 S 135CA-90336
OREGON,STATE OF DEPT OF VETS OREGON,STATE OF DEPT OF VETS
Go CHAPMAN,JOHN H&ELAINE L Go HAFLIGER,CRAIG J 8 VICKI
10112 SW TRAPPER TERR 12609 SW SNOWBRUSH CT
BEAVERTON,OR 97005 TIGARD,OR 97223
1S135CA-90358 1S135CA-90244
PAINTER,ALLEN C AND JANET SUE PARKER,DAVID HORACE
3111 SE TINDELL 11048 SW GREENBURG RD#244
PORTLAND,OR 97202 TIGARD,OR 97223
1S135CA-90333 1S135CA-90220
PENDLETON,CHARLES D&ROSALIE PETROSIAN,ROBERT
2535 SW ROXBURY AVE 11044 SW GREENBURG RD#220
PORTLAND,OR 97225 TIGARD,OR 97223
1S135CA-90309 1S135CA-02500
RAKHLIN,DMITRIY ROBINSON,E LEE&RANDY S
SERGEYEVA,YELENA Go KIRKMAN,JAY M
11040 SW GREENBURG RD#309 17595 SW BANY RD
TIGARD,OR 97223 BEAVERTON,OR 97007
1S135CA-02600 1S135BC-01100
ROBINSON,E LEE&RANDY S ROBINSON,E LEE EVELYN L
Go KIRKMAN,JAY M 15375 NW WEST UNION RD
17595 SW BANY RD PORTLAND,OR 97229
BEAVERTON,OR 97007
7S135CA-90348 1S135CA-00600
ROWLANDS,CLEMENT B II SANITILLI,ARMAND J ET AL
17048 SW GREENBURG#348 cJo LANGFUS,AARON ETAL
TIGARD,OR 97223 PO BOX 02092
PORTLAND,OR 97202
7S135CA-90254 1S135CA-90360
SEAMAN,MARK H/LYNN/TRUSTEE SERGEYEVA,YELENA B
8407 SW 58TH 11150 SW GREENBURG RD#360
PORTLAND,OR 97219 TIGARD,OR 97223
1S135CA-90114 1S135CA-90321
SMITH,WINIFRED K WAHL,KIMBERLY ANN
905 SW MAPLECREST DR 7054 SW LOCUST ST
PORTLAND,OR 97219 TIGARD,OR 97223
1S135CA-90126 1S135CA-90312
WAIBLE,RICHARD L WESTCOTf,DAVI�R
2133 N SKIDMORE CT 5828 SW CHELTENHAM DR
PORTLAND,OR 97217 PORTLAND,OR 97201
15135CA-90113 1S135CA-90218
WESTCOTT,DAVID R WESTCOTT,DAVID R
5828 SW CHELTENHAM DR 5828 SW CHETENHAM DR
PORTLAND,OR 97201 PORTLAND,OR 97207
cu�'�I�-c�n�j L r�,2�1�--� T+� Rz� �'"�1,`T��2- LF�, 4 0��4)
1S135CA-90217 7S135CA-90115
WESTCOTT,DAVID R WHITE,VERNON CNALLEDA N
5828 SW CHELTENHAM DR 1040 NEPTUNE CT SE
PORTLAND,OR 97201 SALEM,OR 97301
INTERFAITH OUTREACH SERVICES
PO BOX 230821
TIGARD OR 97281
.
� AFFIDAYIT OF cm oF noaen
Commumty,Devc(opmertt
S�+aping jl�Bttta Commurtity
SxA?'�O�'O��GOTr )
County of�iNashington )ss
City of?'sgar�f' )
I, Susaa M.Weber, being first duly swom/affirm, on oath depose and say that I am an Administrative Specialist I for the
City of Tigard, Washington County, Oregon.
❑ That I served NOTICE OF (AMENDED ❑) PUBLIC NEARIN6 FoR:
(sw��w.■s.�a11.► �df�icMl�ml
(CM�t�M�1�1 N1c MIM�I}
❑ City of Tigard Planning Director
0 Tigard Hearings Officer
0 Tigard Planning Commission
❑ Tigard City Council
❑ That I served NoncE oF (AMENDED ❑) DECISION FO�:
ca.d..ro.....�.rn
❑ City of Tigard Planning Director
� That I served NOTICE OF (AMENDED 0� �IMAL ORDEB FDR:
RMetw+wa�w�ealb)
{CMCk�fM�Ni MN�r}
❑ City of Tigard Planning Director
` ' Tigard Hearings�fficer
� 0 Tigard Planning Commission
C Tigard City Council
❑ That I served ATHER NOTICE OF F08;
A copy of the POBIIe HEARIN6 NOnCE/tlOT10E OF DECISIAN/N�TIgE AF ANAL BROER/ATNER MOT1�HSl o#which is attached,
marked Exhibit "A", was mailed to each named person(s) at the address(s) shown on the attached list(s), ��I'k!d
Ex6ibit"B", on the�-�day of J�IM 1997, and depasited in the United States Mail on the
I 5'�'�`-� day of .Tt.�.(� 199T,postage prepaid.
��'�t�,"yY� i,U.Q.���i�.i
[Pers�n that Prepared Motleel
� , ,
Subscribed and swom/affirmed before me on the�_day o�--- �- , 19��
OFFICIAI SEAL �`.4
DIANE M JELDERKS �/ r � .
NOTARY PUBLIC-OREGON ,
COMMISSION NO.046�n2 NOT T P08LIC OF E�OM
MY COMMISSION EXPIRES SEPTEMBEH�� '`�`'': �COmm�Bp�IfII� ��
�'/ 9
�� RLE IMN: ;�
�.� C�1 P 9� • Doc� �� i rr� �.�T E ��►;�r-'-,
. ' EXHIBIT A
CITY OF TIOARD
Communtty�DeceCoprrunt
„ S�+aping�i�BetterCommunity
CITY OF TI6ARD
. '(Nashington County, Oregon
NOTICE OF FINAL ORDER c� BY THE NEARIHGS OFFICER
Case Number(s): CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT (CUP) 97-0006
Case Name(s): THE RITE CENTER
Name of Owner: IntPrfaith C�utreach Services
Name of Applicant: �Same as own�r�
Address of Applicant: PO Box 230821 City: Tiaard State: Oregon Zip: 97281
Address of Property: 11070 � 11130 SW Greenburg Road City: Tiqard State: Oregon Zip: 97223
Tax Map(s) & Lot No(s).:WCTM 1S135CA, Tax Lots 02500 & 02600.
R�anest—� The City of Tigard Hearing's Officer has approved, subject to conditions, a request for
Conditional Use approval to allow the construction of a 36-bed homeless facility.
leae: Residential, 12 Units Per Acre; R-12. The R-12 zone allows single-family attached/detached
residential units, multiple-family residential units, residential care facilities, mobile home parks
and subdivision, public support services, family day care, home occupation, temporary use,
residential fuel tank, and accessory structures, among other uses. APPLICABLE BFYIEW CBITERUL•
Community Development Code Chapters 18.54, 18.100, 18.102, 18.106, 18.108, 18.120,
18.130, 18.150 and 18.164. Comprehensive Plan Policies 2.1.1, 4.2.1, 6.1.1, 7.1.2, 7.3.1,
7.4.4, 7.6.1, 8.1.1 and8.1.3.
Acd�a: —> D Approval as requested � Approval with conditions ❑ Denial
Il�d�e: Notice was published in the newspaper, posted at City Hall and mailed to:
0 Owners of record within the required distance � Affected govemmental agencies
� The affected Citizen Involvement Team Facilitator � The applicant and owner(s)
Rnal Decfsien: �
TNE DECISIOM SHAII BE FlMAI ON FRIDAY IOtY 25,199I DMIESS Ali APPEAL IS RLEB.
The adopted findings of fact, decision and statement of conditions can be obtained from
the City of Tigard Planning Division, Tigard City HaH, 13125 SW Hall Boulevard, Tigard,
Oregon 97223.
Appeal: Any party to the decision may appeal this decision in accordance with 18.32.290 (B) and
Section 18.32.370, which provides that a written appeal may be filed within ten (10) days
after notice is given and sent. The appeal may be submitted on City forms and must be
accompanied by the appeal fee(s) of $1,745.00 plus transcript costs, not in excess of
$500.00.
TNE�EADUNE F8R AUM6 OF AM APPEILL IS 3:3Q P.M.OM IOIY 25.199Z -
leestl�DS: If you have any questions, please call the City of Tigard Planning Division at (503) 639-4171.
CUP 97-0008 THE RITE CENTER NOTICE OF FINAI OR�ER BY THE HEARING'S OFFICER
BEFORE THE LAND USE HEARINGS OFFICER
FOR THE CTTY OF TIGARD, OREGON
� Regarding an applicaaon for a condiaonal use permit ) F I N A L O R D E R
for a 36-bed homeless facility for Interfaith Outreach )
_ Services in the R-12 zone at 11070-11130 SW ) CUP 97-0006
Greenberg Road in the City of Tigard, Oregon ) (The Rite Center)
I. SUMMARY
1. Interfaith Outreach Services (IOS)requests approval of a conditional use pennit
to build and operate a 36-bed homeless shelter on a.72-acre parcel consisting of two lots.
The facility will be built in two phases. In the first phase,the applicant will remove two
existing homes and will build 10 off-st�et parking spaces and a 5000-square foot, one-
story structure containing 24 beds in 6 rooms,common cooking and dining rooms, a child
development center and accessory activities. In the second phase,the applicant will place a
15�0-square foot structure on the site for offices and will build four more off-street parking
spaces and a 2630-square foot addidon containing an addiaonal 12 beds in three rooms,
plus a manager's apartment and associated common features. As amended, the proposed
development will comply with all applicable dimensional standards of the R-12 zone.
2. At the public hearing in this matter,City staff recommended conditional
approval. The applicant accepted the recommended conditions and r�esponded to public
testimony. One neighbor testified against the conditional use pernut,citing concerns about
land use compatibility,safety and the propriety of this use in a residential zone.
3. In this final order,the hearings officer approves the conditional use permit based
on the findings and conclusions included and incorporated herein and subject to conditions
recommended by City staff except as expressly provided otherwise in this final order.
II. BASIC FACTS INCORPORATED BY REFERENCE
The hearings officer incorporates by reference the findings about the site and surroundings
in Secdon III of the Staff Report dated June 27, 1997 (the Staff Report), and the staff and
agency comments in Section V of the Staff Report.
III. APPLICABLE APPROVAL STANDARDS
The applicable approval standards are identified in Section N of the Staff Report.
N. HEARING AND RECORD
l. Hearings Officer Lazry Epstein (the "hearings officer")received testimony at the
public hearing about this application on July 7, 1997. A record of that testimony is
included herein as Exhibit A (Parties of Record), Exhibit B (Taped Proceedings), and
Exhibit C (Written Testimony). These exhibits are filed at the Tigard City Hall. The
hearings officer described how the hearing would be conducted, and made the
announcements and disclosures requined by law, including a disclosure that the hearings
officer visited the site of the proposed facility before the hearing. The following fmdings
summanize selected testimony offered at the hearing.
2. City planner Will D'Andrea summarized the project and the Staff Report.
Hearings Officer Final Ordes
CUP 97-0006(The Rite Center) Page 1
3. Kim Brown and Keith Liden testitied for the applicant.
_ a. Ms. Brown accepted the Staff Report and recommended conditions of
approval without objection. She summarized the services IOS will provide at the site and
highlights of management and operaoions policies for residents and other clients of the
_ facility. She summarized IOS's experience operadng a homeless shelter in the city for the
last eight years,based on which she argued the faciliry will not have adverse effects on the
vicinity. She argued the proposed facility has a residenual character and a relatively small
scale compared to more densely developed two-story apartments and condominiums
abutting the site.
b. Mr. Liden introduced into the record letters from McKeever/Morris, Inc.
to the fire district dated June 23, 1997 and from Architects Van Lom/Edwards, AIA,PC to
Will D'Andrea dated June 25, 1997. He elaborated about the design of the proposed
facility being compatible with the character of the area and responsive to the shape of the
site. He highlighted proposed landscaping and screening,noting proposed trees will be
concentrated on the south side of the site where there are no or fewer such trees than on the
north side.
4. Kira Govshtein testified on behalf of herself and her uncle, who own units in
the condominium adjoining the site. She argued the proposed use is commercial in nature
and should be in a commercial zone rather than in a residential zone generally or in what
she characterized as an exclusively residential area in this case. She argued the facility was
incompatible with the adjoining residential uses,because the residents of the facility are
homeless. She tescified about her belief that most homeless people also are mentally ill,
and that such people pose a hazard to residents of the adjoining condominium. Ms.
Govshtein testified she received the Staff Report too late to prepare adequately. She also
asked the hearings officer to summarize his observadon during the site visit, which the
hearings officer did.
5. Ms. Brown responded to Ms. Govshtein. She highlighted policies under which
IOS operates its existing facility and will operate the proposed facility. Among other
things,residents of the facility have to comply with those policies or they are ejected. If a
person is ejected, she explained IOS staff accompany that person to a bus and give them a
ticket or take other steps to ensure they leave. IOS also contacts the police about the
ejection, and the police monitor the vicinity in response. Similar_policies have worked well
at the existing facility in that no neighbor has complained about or reported inappropriate
behavior by facility residents or suspected crimes by those residents. She noted the facility
staff is supported by 250 volunteers. She noted the facility will be largely family-oriented.
The eacisting faciliry serves a relatively large number of families with children. She testitied
that roughly 30 percent of homeless people are mentally ill. She testified IOS conducted a
screening process before a person is accepted at the faciliry, and people who are mentally ill
are referred to another facility. The proposed facility will not serve people who are
mentally ill. She noted that the Tigard Community Development Code does not allow the
facility in a commercial zone. It only is allowed in a residential zone(R-12 and higher).
She summarized past meetings between the condominium associadon board of directors
and the applicant and commitments to maintain contact with the association board.
6. At the conclusion of the public portion of the hearing,the hearings officer closed
the public record and announced an intention to approve the conditional use permit subject
aenerally to the conditions recommended by staff.
Hearings OfJ`icer Final Order
CUP 97-0006(The Rite Center) Page 2
V. DISCUSSION
- 1. The hearings officer concurs in the analysis and conclusions offered by city
staff; to wit, the application shows that the proposal dces or can comply with the applicable
standards and criteria for a conditional use perrrut, and adoption of recommended
• condidons of approval as arnended will ensure final plans ac�submitted consistent with
those criteria and standards and will prevent,reduce or mitigate potential adverse impacts of
the development consistent with the requirements of the Tigard Community Development
Code ("CDC"). The hearings officer adopts the findings and conclusions ui the June 27
Staff Report as his own except as otherwise expressly provided herein.
2. Ms. Govshtein presented the only disputed issues in this case. The following
findings are responsive to her testimony.
a. The proposed use is permitted in the R-12 zone and is not permitted in
lower density residential zones or in commercial or industrial zones. CDC 18.54.040.
Therefore it is presumptively compatible with other uses in the R-12 zone, subject to
conditions and development standards to ensure the use is compatible in fact
b. The hearings officer fmds the proposed use will be compatible (although
that is not a standazd for the conditional use permit, per se) as follows.
i. Because its relatively small scale(e.g., one story height), the
proposed structure will not loom over or physically dominate other structures in the
viciniry. Conditions of approval and site design requirements ensure that lights on the site
will not be directed nor cast significant light onto adjoining properties,signage is
compatible with other signs in the area,etc. The materials,finishes and colors proposed to
be used for the facility are like and are compatible with materials from which other housing
in the area is built Proposed landscaping is consistent with the CDC and is selected and
placed to achieve a maximum screening and buffering effect The stcvcture and
surrounding will be visually pleasing when viewed from off-site.
u. Because parldng is isolated on the west side of the site, farihest
&om the condominiums, noise,dust and fumes associated with vehicle maneuvering will
have little or no impact on the condominiums.
iu. Because the facility will serve many families and will not serve
mentally ill people, the faciliry and adjoining condominiums will serve substandally similar
populadons. Although the residents of the facility are homeless, they are not criminal,
andsocial or otherwise inherendy a danger or risk to surrounding residents,particulazly
given the scrudny to which the IOS subjects prospective residents before they are accepted
and the policies to which residents of the facility vv�ll be subject. Homelessness is not a
measure of a person's respect for the law or rights of others or abiliry to live in peace and
haimony with neighbors. Although Ms. Govshtein's concerns appeared to be deeply and
sincerely felt by her, they are not based on substantial evidence in the record in this case.
They may be based on her experiences in the former Soviet Union or elsewhere. But, in
the absence of substantial evidence to support them, those concerns are not a basis for
denying or conditioning the proposal under the law. Based on the substantial evidence that
the facility has not created problems at its eusting location, there is no reasonable basis for
concluding that the facility's residents pose a hazard or risk to�sidents of the vicinity of
the proposed facility.
Hearings O,�icer Final Order
CUP 97-0006(Tht Rite Center) Page 3
c. The hearings officer tinds the faciliry complies with the standards for a
conciidonal use permit for the reasons given in the Staff Report and the following:
i. The site size and dimensions provide adequate area for the needs
of the proposed use,because the site will contain the requisite number of off-street parlong
. spaces designed consistent with CDC 18.106; landscaping,buffering and screening will
comply with CDC 18.100;and setbacks will comply with the dimensional requirements of
the R-12 zone (CDC 18.54.050).
ii. The characteristics of the site are suitable for the proposed use
considering its size and shape, based on the preceding fmding. Its location is suitable,
because the site is located in a district in which it is permitted as a conditional use; it is
situated between two other residential uses and at the edge of the residential area; general
vehicular access to the site is direct from Greenberg Road rather than through a residential
neighborhood; it has ready access to multiple forms of transportation along Greenberg
Road (i.e.,bicycle and bus); and it is situated within the area the facility is intended to
serve. The topography of the site is suitable, because it is flat, poses no restrictions on the
design of the site,and does not create unusual potential for drainage impacts. There are
few natural features on the site. However existing t�rees abutting the site have been
considered in the design of the facility.
iii. All required public facilities can serve the proposed use,
including public water, sanitary sewer and drainage facilities,roads, and poliee, fire and
other emergency services, based on substandal evidence in the record(i.e.,written
statements from the service providers).
iv. The proposal complies with the use and dimensional
requirements of the R1-2 zone, based on preceding findings.
v. The proposal does or will comply with applicahle signage
regulations, provided the applicant applies for and receives approval of a sign permit if one
is requu�ed or the applicant installs an exempt sign consistent with CDC 18.114.060.
Conditions of approval do not direcdy r�equire such a permit or compliance. The conditions
should be amended to address this issue exp�ssly.
__ vi. The proposal dces or will comply with applicable approval
standazds in CDC 18.120.18U,based on the fmdings in the Staff Report and condidon of
approval5.
vu. The proposal complies with the applicable policies of the
comprehensive plan,based on the findings in the Staff Repon.
d. Many of the fmdings supporting approval of this application rely on the
applicant to conduct the use substantially as represented in the applicadon and the
applicant's testimony. There is no reason to believe the applicant would vary from those
representations, but things do change. To ensure the proposed use continues to be
conducted substantially as represented by the applicant in this matter, a condition of
approval is warranted requiring it, subject to changes permitted by law.
3. Ms. Govshtein testitied that she did not have enough time to prepare for the
hearing,because she d.id not dmely receive the Staff Report. The CDC dces not require the
Ciry to send a copy of the staff report to residents of the vicinity. It requires the City to
send nodce of the public hearing and to include in that notice a statement that the staff�port
will be available 7 days before the hearing. Such a notice was given in this case,based on
Hearings Officer Fina!Order
CUP 97-0006(The Rire Ce�ete�) Page 4
the nodce and certificadon in the record. The staff report in this case was available on or
about June 27, mor�e than seven days before the hearing. Therefore the notice given in this
_ case and the publicadon of the staff report complied with the CDC. Moreover the hearings
officer finds Ms. Govshtein presented a cogent and articulate argument on behalf of herself
and her uncle. Although she might have benefitted from seeing the report earlier,her
- failure to do so did not substantially impair her ability to participate meaningfully in the
review of the applicaaon to the extent that she was denied procedural due process.
VI. STTE VISIT BY HEARINGS OFFICER
The hearings officer visited the site and surrounding area and summarized his
observations at the hearing in this matter.
VII. CONCLUSION AND DECISION
1. The hearings officer concludes that the proposed condidonai use permit
complies with the applicable criteria and standards of the Community Development Code.
provided development that occurs after this decision complies with applicable local,state,
and federal laws and with conditions of approval wamanted to ensure such compliance
occurs.
2. In recognition of the findings and conclusions contained herein, and
incorporating the Staff Report and public testimony and exhibits received in this matter, the
hearings officer hereby approves CUP 97-0006 ('I'he Rite Center),subject w the cond.itions
of approval in Section II of the City of�gard Staff Report,with the following changes:
a. Condidon of approvalS.E is hereby added to read as follows:
E. Signs pmposed for the site consistent with CDC 18.114 and, if
necessary,a sign pernait application.
b. Condition of approval 10 is hereby added to read as follows:
10. The faciliry shall be operated substantially as�presented in the
applicadon and in the testimony in this matter;provided, the
�pplicant may propose changes consistent with and subject to the
applicable requirements of CDC 18.130.
AT'ED 9th day o , 1997.
Larry Epste' , AI
City of Tig d H ' s Officer
Hearings Offuer Final Order
CUP 97-0006{The Ritt Center) Page S
Aganda ttem: 2.3
Hearing Date: Juiv 7. 1997 Time: 7-00 PM
STAFF REPORT TO THE
� - HEARtNG'S OFFICER
cmr of nowac
FQR THE CtTY QF TIGARD, OREGON �°"�""�'SDe�"�°�"'"
s ' �!�rttcr c
$ECTION I: APPLICATI�N SUMMARY
CASES: FI�E NAME• TH RITF C`FNTFR
Conditional Use Permit (CUP) 97-0006
PROPOSAL: A request for Conditional Use approval to allow the construction of a
36-bed homeless faalit�r. -
APPUCANT: Interfaith Outreach Services OWNER: Same
PO Box 230821
Tigard, OR 97281
COMPREHENSNE. ..• . , , -.�,��x.;: •. _ . ,: ,.., .
PLAN
DESIGNATION: Medium Density.
tONING . . - �
DESIGNATION: Residential, 12 Unifis Per Acre; R-12.
LOCATION: 11070 and 11140 SW Greenburg Road; WCTM 1 S135CA, Tax Lots
02500 and 02600. Located in the eastem terminus of SW Tiedeman
Street and SVV Geenburg Road.
APPLICABLE .
REVIEVN
CRITERIA: Community Development Code Chapters 18.54, 18.100, 18.102,
18.106, 18.108, 18.120, 18.130, 18.150 and 18.164. Comprehensive
Plan Policies 2.1.1. 4.2.1, 6.1.1, 7.1.2, 7.3.1, 7.4.4, 7.6.1, 8.1.1 and
8.1.3.
�ECTION II: STAFF RECOMMENDATI�N
Staff recommends that the Hearings Officer find that the proposed Conditionaf Use witl not
adversely affect the health, safety and weffare of the City. Therefore, staff recommends
APPROVAL, subject to the following recommended conditions of approvat:
STAF�REPORT TO THE NEAFtINGS OFFICER (X1p �7-0ppg- THE WTE CENTER PAGE 1 OF 15
CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL
PRIOR T� THE ISSUANCE OF THE SITE AND/OR BUILDING PERMIT(S)� .
THE FOLL�WING CONDITIONS SHALL BE SATtSFiED:
(Uniess otherwise nobed, the staff contact shall be Brian Rager,
. Engineering Department(503} 639�171.j �
�
1. Prior to issuance of a site and/or building permit, a Street Opening Permit will be
required for this project to cover the sanitary sewer and stoRn sewer connecfions in
SW Greenburg Road, plus any other work proposed in the pub(ic right-of-way. The
applicant will need to submit five (5) copies of a proposed public improvement plan
for review and approval. NOTE: these plans are in addition to any drawings required
by the Building Division and should only include infortnation relevant to the public
improvements. This permit shafl be obtained by the applicant prior to issuance of the
site and/or building permi�
2. As a part of the public improvement plan submittal, the Engineerir�g Department shall
be provided with the name, address and telephone number of the individual or
corporate entity who will be responsible for executing the compliance agreement and
providing the financial assurance for the public improvements.
3. Any proposed services from the City water line shall be shown on the proposed
pubfic improvement construction drawings and shall be reviewed and approved by
the City's Water Department, as a part of the Engineering Departrnent plan review.
4. The applicant shall provide an on-site water quality facility as required by Unfied
Sewerage Agency Resolution and Order No. 91�7. Final plans and calculations
shall be submitted to the Engineering Departrnent for review and approval prior to
issuance of the site and/or building penni� In addfion, a proposed maintenance plan
shall be submitted along with the plans and calculations for review and approval.
5. Revised site and landscaping plans shall be submitted for review by the Planning
Division, Staff Contac�t: Will D'Andrea (503-639-�171). The revised plans shall
include the following:
A. landscaping to be incorporated into the berm that will effectively screen the
paricing lot from view, and an additional two (2) parking lot trees to be located
within the landscape islands adjacent to the driveway;
B. minimum driveway width of 24 feet;
C. caliper size of the trees to be removed. If these trees are greater than 12-inch
caliper, the applicant shall provide mitigation in accordance with Sedion
18.150.025(B)(2); and
D. written sign-off from the hauler regarding the compatibility and location of the
trash enclosure faality. -
5?AFF REPORT TO THE HEARING'S OFFICER CUP 97-0OOG- THE WTE CENTER PAGE 2 OF 15
6. Documentation that tax iots 02500 and 02600 have been consolidated.
7. Plans approved by Tualatin Valiey Fire and Rescue (AGENCY CONTACT: Gene
6irchil().
� THE FOLLOWING CONDlT10NS SHALL BE SATISFIED
� PRIOR TO A FINAL BUILOfNG INSPECT(ON:
8. The applicant shall complete the required public improvements and close-out the
Street Opening PeRnit.
9. Prior to final inspection for the site andlor the building, the design engineer shall
provide certfication to the Building Official that the private water qualiiy faci(ity was
constructed in accordance with the approved plan. (STAFF CONTACT: David
Scott, 639-4171. ext. 311).
SECTION III: BACKGROUND INFORMATION
Site Historv:
No development applications were found to have been filed with the City.
Vcini Information:
The subject site is located at the eastem terminus of the intersection of SW Tiedeman
Avenue and SW Greenburg Road. Property to the north, east, and south are zoned R-12
(Residential, 12 units per acre). Property to the west is zoned I-P (Industrial Park). The
area is developed with a mix of mu�i-family residential and commercial uses.
Site Information and Pro�osal Desc*+otion• � _ _
The .72 acre site consists of two (2) lots and is developed with two (2) single-family
residences and associated accessory structures. The site has access to SW Greenburg
Road. The applicant is requesting Conditional Use approval to allow the construcbion of a
36-bed homeless faci(ity. The proposal will be constructed in two (2) phases. The first
phase will allow the construcfion of a 5,000 square foot building and ten (10) parlcing
spaces. The facility will incfude 24 beds (6 guest rooms), common kitchen and dining
faciiities, and a child development center. The existing residential building will be
removed. The second phase will include siting a 1,500 square foot modular building to
allow for administrative offices, construction of an additional four (4) parking spaces, and a
2,630 square foot addition. The facility addition will provide an additional 12 beds (3
additional guest rooms), storage, some additional common facilities, and a managers
apartment for a total of 7,630 square feet.
STAFF REPORT TO THE HFJ4RlNGS OFFICER CUP 97-0006_ THE RlTE CEM'ER PAGE 3 OF 15
The center will be open for persons living there temporarily from 5:00 p.m. to 8:00 a.m.
seven (7) days a week, year round. in addition, the facility wili house the child
development center which wiil operate Monday through Friday from 8:00 a.m. to 5:00 p.m. '
An after school program will also be provided. The Interfaith Outreach Services (IOS)
Heafth Clinic will be providing medical volunteers who will be available during scheduled � .
hours. Phase II of the project will include a clothes closet and food pantry for walk-in
clients. The office will be used exclusively to provide office space for IOS staff charged .
with the operation of the RITE Center, the associated on-site Self-Sufficiency Program,
and with IOS administrative activfies necessary to support the Center.
SECTION IV: APPLICABLE REVIEW CRITERIA AND FINDINGS
COMPLIANCE WITH COMMUNtTY DEVELOPMENT CODE SECTIONS:
Imoact Studv: Section 18.32.050 states that the applicant shafl provide an impact
study to quantify the effect of development on public facilities and services. For
each public facility system and type of impact, the study shall propose
improvements necessary to meet City standard, and to minimize the impact of the
development on the public at large, public facilities systems� and affected private
property users. In situations where the Community Development Code requires the
dedication of real property interests, the applicant shall either specifically concur
with a requirement for public right-0f-way dedication, or provide evidence that
supports that the real properly dedication requirement is not roughly proportio�al
to the projected impact�s of the development Section 18.32.250 states that when a
condition of approval requires the transfer to the public of an intierest in real
property, the approval authority shall adopt findings which support the conclusion
that the interest in real property to be transferred is roughly p�oportio�al to tt�e
impact the proposed development will have on the public. There are no real property
dedications required with this application. .
Use Classification: The applicant is proposing to construct a homeless facility. This use is
classified in Code Section 18.42 (Use Classfications) as Group Residential. Code Section
18.54.040 states that Group Residential is a Conditional Use in the R-12 zone.
Conditional Use: Section 18.130.040 contains the fotlowing general approval criteria
for a Conditional Use:
The site size and dimensions provide adequate area for the needs of the proposed
use. As indicated on the site plan, the proposed center meets all of the dimensional
requirements for minimum site size, building setbacks, and landscaping.
The characteristics of U�e site are suitable for the proposed use considering size.
shape� location, topography, and nah�ral features. The site has an inegular shape but
the building is designed to fit well within the property and not have a detrimental visual
impact on surrounding properties. The location of the center is appropriate with dired
access to a fully improved major collector street. The site does not contain physical
constraints.
STAFF REPORT TO THE MEARING'S OFFICER CUP 97-0006- THE R1T'E CEM'ER PAGE 4 OF 1 S
All required public facilities have adequate capacity to serve the proposal. Adequate _
pub(ic facilities are present and currently serve the site or shall be provided by conditions of
approval. �
� The applicable requirements of the zoning district are met except as modified by this
• chaptier. The proposed use meets all of the applicable requirements of the R-12 zone and
- the conditional use approvat cxiteria.
The supplementary requirements set forth in Chapber 18.114 (Signs) and Section
18.120.180 (Approval Standards) Site Development Review, if applicable, are met
Compliance with the app(icable Site Development Review criteria can be satisfied by this
proposal, as demonstrated by the analysis presented within this report and review process.
The use will comply with the applicabfe policies of the Compr+ehensive Plan.
Compliance with Comprehensive Plan Policies can be satisfied by this proposal as
demonstrated by the analysis presented within this report and through the review process.
Conditional Use - Gro�Q Residential: Section 18.130.150(C)(1� states that Group
Residential uses must meet the following additional dimensional requirements:
AR�b�e Zone: Single-family and mutti-family residential. The subject property is
zoned R-12 (Residential. 12 unit,s per acre). _
Nlinimum Lot Size• 5,000 square feet The subject site contains approximately 31,360
square feet, exceeding the minimum 5,000 square foot, minimum lot size.
Minim�m Setbacks• See applicable zone. The required muttiple-famity setbacks in the
R-12 zone are as follows: front yard - 20 fee� side yard - 10 fee� and rear yard - 20 feet.
As indicated on the site plan, the proposed structures comply with the required setbacks.
Nei�ht Limitations: See applicable zone. The maximum building height in the R-12 zone
is 35 feet The proposed plan shows that the building height is 24 fieet, wel) under the
maximum allowed.
Comnliance With All State Ree���.,�,.+,e.++,�, qpp�icable state agenaes will ensure that this
facility shall comply with all state requirements. ,
�ffStreet Parking;�� section 18 106 030 Section 18.106_030_A_d �q��� a
minimum of o�e (1) parking space for each guest room plus 1 space for each
employee. The two (2) phases of the center will have a total of nine (9) guest rooms. In
addfion, there will be up to five (5) employees during the day, and fewer staff members
during the remainder of the day and night This proposal, therefore, requires 14 parking
spaces. There will be a total of sa (6) guest rooms construded with Phase I. Six (6) parking
spaces are required to serve Phase I. Ten (10) parlcing spaces are proposed with the
construction of Phase I. An additionaf three (3j guest rooms and administratnre offices will
be constructed with Phase II. An additional four(4) spaces will be constructed with Phase II,
bringing the total on-site parking to fourteen (14) spaces. Therefore, the proposed phasing
plan comp(ies with this section.
STAFF REPORT TO THE HE�4RING'S OFFlCFR CUp 97.ppp8. THE RfTE CENTER PAGE S OF 15
� Develooment Review - Anoroval Standards: Section '18.120.180(A)(1) requires
that a development proposal be found to b�e consistant with the various standards of
the Community Development Code. The applicable criteria in this case are Chapters •
18.100, 18.102, 18.106, 18.108, 18.114, 18.120� and 18.164. The proposal's consistency
with these Code Chapbers is reviewed in the following sections. The proposal contains _
no elements related to the provisions of Code Chapters 18.80 (Planned Developments),
18.84 (Sensitive Lands), 18.92 (Density Computations), 18.94 (Manufactured/Mobiie Home
Regulations) or 18.98 (Building Height Limitations: Exceptions), or 18.144 (Accessory Use
and Structures) which are also (isted under Section 18.120.180.A.1. These Chapters are,
therefore, found to be inapplicable as approval standards.
Section 18.120.180(A)(2) provides other Site Development Review approval standards
not necessarily covered by the provisions of the previously listed sections. These
otfier standards are addressed immediabely below. The proposaf contains no elements
related to the provisions of 18.120.180.3 (Exterior Elevations), 18.120.180.5 (Privacy and
Noise), 18.120.180.6 (Private Outdoor Areas: Residential Use), 18.120.180.7 (Shar�ed
Outdoor Recreation Areas: Residentia( Use), 18.120.180.8 (100-year floodplain),
18.120.180.9 (Demarcation of Spaces), and are, therefore, found to be inapplicable as
approval standards. �
Relationshio to the Natural and Phvsical Environment Section 18.120.180.2 stabes
that buildings shall be located to preserve existing trees, topography. and natural
drainage and that trees having a six (6) inch caiiper or greaber� shall be preserved or
replaced by new plantings of equal character. The subject site is cumentl�r developed
with two (2) residential structures, accessory structures, and a gravel parking bt area.
Existing topography and natural drainage will not be impacted by this proposal. In
accordance with Section 18.150� trees greater than 12-inch caliper will be mitigated. The
proposed plan also includes new parking lot and street trees. �
Bufferina. Screening and Com tibili between a�,�joini uses: Section
18.120.108.4(A} states that buffering shall be provided between different types of land
uses. Buffering has been provided in acxordance with the Buffer Matrix (18.100.130) and
Landscaping Section 18.100.070.
Section 18.120.108.4(B) stabes that on�sitie screening from view of adjoining
properties of such things as service and storage areas, parking lots, and mechanical
devices on roof tops shall be provided. As indiqted on the site plan, parking and
storage areas shall be screened from adjoining properties.
Crime Prevention and Safetv: Section 18.120.108.10 requires that exterior lighti�g
levels be selected and the angles shall be oriented towards areas vulnerable to crime
and shall be placed in areas having heavy pedestrian or vehicular traffic. The City of
Tigard Pofice Department has reviewed the applicant's plan and has no comments or
objections to the plan, thereby, satisfying this criteria.
Phased Develo°men� Section 18.120.Q50 allows approval of a time schedule for
developing a site in phases over a period of time of one year, but in no case shall the
total time period for all phases be greater than tt�ree years without reapplying for site
STAFF RFPORT TO THE HEARlNGS OFFlCER CUP 97-0OOG- 7HE RffE CEN7ER P/1GE 6 OF 15
development review. The critieria for approving a phased site development review
proposal is that the following are satisfied:
+ The pubiic facilities are constructed in conjunction with or prior to each phase. All
public facilities required to serve both phases shall be constructed in conjunction with the
• first phase. -
The development and occupancy of any phase is not dependent on the use of
temporary public facitities (a temporary facility is any facility not constructed to the
applicable City or district standard). The applicant is not proposing the use of any
temporary public facilities.
The phased development shall not result in requiring the City or other property
owners to construct public facilities that were required by an approved development
proposal. The applicant shall construct all necessary improvements to serve this
development
C.andsca�g Plan; Section 18.100.015 requires that the applicant submit a
landscaping plan. This requiremerrt has been satisfied as the applicant has submitted a
plan indicating the �umber, type, and loc�tion of trees and shrubs.
rt
Street Trees: Section 18.100.003 states that all development projects fironting on a
public street shall be required to plant street trees in accordance witfi section
18.100.035. Section 18.100.035 requires that street trees be spaced bet�nieen 20 a�d
40 feet apart depending on the size classification of the tree at rriaturity (small,
medium or large), witfi a rt�inimum caliper of 2 inches at four feet in height As
=� indicated on the landscape plan, street trees shall be provided in accordance with th�s
._. section. � . _ ,
�creening Suecial Provision�; Section 18.100.110(A) requires the screening of
parking and loading areas. Landscaped parking areas shall include special design
features which effectively scree� the parking lot areas from view. Planting materials
to be installed should achieve a relative balance between low lying and vertical
shrubbery and trees. Trees shall be planted in landscaped islands in all parking
areas, and shall be equally distribu�ed on the basis of one tree for each seve� parking
spaces in order to provide a canopy ef�ect The minimum dimension on the
landscape islands shall be three fieet and the landscaping shall be protectied from
vehicular damage by some foRn of wheel guard or curb. The proposed landscape plan
shows a finro (2)-foot-high, grassed berm. This berm is not adequate to provide screening of
the paricing lot from view. A revised landscape plan shall be submitted which provides for
landscaping to be incorporated into the berm that will effectively screen the parking lot from
view. Parking lot trees are required to provide a canopy effect within the parking areas. The
proposed street trees will provide partial canopy coverage of the parking area. In order to
provide the required canopy coverage, a revised landscape plan shall be submitted that
provides for an addfional two (2) parking lot trees to be located within the landscape islands
adjacent to the driveway.
STAFF REPORT TO THE HEARINGS OFFlCER CUp 97-0pp6_ THE RlTE CEHTER PAGE 7 OF 15
Buffer Matrix: Section 18.100.130 contains the buffer matrix to be used in calculating
widths of buffering and screening to be installed between proposed uses. The Matrix
indicates that where one-story residential use and a parking area, which provides 4- '
50 parking spaces, abuts a rBSidential zone the required buffer and screening width
shall be 10 feet The minimum improvements within a buffer area shalt consist of the -
following: 1) At least one �ow of trees shall be ptanted. They shall be not less than 10
feet high for deciduous trees and 5 feet high for evergreen trees at the time of
planting. Spacing of the trees depends on the size of the tree at maturity; 2j In
addition, at least 10 five gallon shrubs o� 20 one gallon shrubs shall be ptanted for
each 1000 square feet of requir+ed buffer area; 3) The remaining area shall be plantied
in lawn, groundcover or spread with bark mulch. The parking lot buffer area contains
appro�cimately 1,500 square feet Therefor+e, the buffer shall contain an additional 10
five gallon or 20 one gallon shnibs in addition to the one row of trees. The appliqnt
has provided screening in acxordance with Section 18.100.070.C, thereby, satisfying this
criteria.
Scr�eening and Bufferina^uirements: Section 18.'t00.080(E) stabes that where _
screening is required the following standards shall apply in addition to those required -
for bufFering; 1) a hedge of narrow or broadleaf evergreen shrubs which will fonn a 4
foot continuous screen within 2 years of ptanting, or; 2) an earthen berm planted with
evergreen plant materials which will form a continuous screen 6 feet in height within 2
years. The unplanbed portion of the berm shall be plantied in lawn, ground cover or
bark mulch, or; 3) a 5 foot or taller fence or wall shall be constructed to provide a
continuous sight obscuring screen. The applicant has provided scxeening in accordance
with Sec6ion 18.100.070.C, thereby, satisfying this criteria.
Section 18.100.070.0 stabes that in lieu of these standards, a detailed buffer area
landscaping and screening plan may be submitLed for the Director's approval as an
albemative to the butfer area landscaping and sct�eening standards� provided it
affords the same degree of buffering and screening as required by this code. The
appl'icant has proposed an altemative landscaping and screening plan. The applicanYs
narrative states that this altemative plan will perfonn as well, or better, than the standard
buf�er in this situation. Staff concurs with the applicanYs findings and concludes that this
cri�teria is satisfied.
�sual Clearance Areas: Section 18.102 requires that a clear vision area shall be
maintained on the comers of all property adjacent to intersecting right-of-ways or the
intersection of a public street and a private driveway. A visual clearance area is the
triangular area foRned by measuring a 30 foot distance along the street right-of-way
and the driveway and then connecting these two 30 foot distance points with a
straight line. A clear vision area shall contain no vehicle, hedge, planting, fence� watl
structure, signs, or bemporary or permanent obstruction exceeding three feet in
height The height ia measured from the top of the curb, or where no curb exists�
from the street center line grade, except that trees ex�eeding this height may be
located in this area, provided all branches below eight feet are removed. As indicated
on the site plan, this criteria is satisfied.
STAFF REPORT TO THE HEAFtING'S OFFICER (XJP 97-0006• THE RRE CENTER PAGE 8 OF 15
The Americans with Disabilities ,4 _t (��; Section 18.106.020(M) became effective
on January 26, 1992. All parking areas shall be provided with the required numbers
and sizes of disabled person parking spaces as specified by applicabie State of
Oregon and federai standar+�ds. All disabied person parking spaces shall be signed
and marked on the pavement as required by these standards. This section requires
• the provision of 1 disabled parking space if 1 to 25 parking spaces are provided. The
- site plan shows the provision of one (1) disabled parking space, thereby, satisfying this
standard.
Bicycle Parkina: Section 18.106.020(O} requires one bicycle parking rack space for
each 15 required vehicular parking spaces in any development Bicycle parking
areas shall not be locatied witt�in parking aisles, landscape areas� or pedestrian ways,
This site requires the provision of one (1) bicyde parking spaoe. The plan shows the
provision of four (4) bicycle parking spaces, thereby, satisfying this standard.
A�: Section 18.108.080 requires that multiple-#amily residential uses serving 3-19
dwelling units or commercial and industrial uses which require less than 100 parking
spaces provide one access with a minimum width of 30 feet and a minimum
pavement width of 24 feet The plan shows the provision of one (1) acoessway with a
width of 23 feet 10 inches (23'10�. A revised plan shall be submitted which provides for a
minimum width of 24 feet, in oompliance with this section.
�BL�I�e�[�: Section 18.108.050(A) requires that a walkway be exbended from the
ground floor e�trance of the structure to the street that provides the required ingress
and egress. Unless impractical, walkways should be constructed between a new
development and neighboring developments. YVherever required walkways cross
vehicle access�Jriveways or parking iots, such crossings shall be designed and
located for pedestrian safety. Requir+ed walkways shall be physieally separatied from
mobor vehicle traffic and parking by either a minimum six (6) inch vertical separation
(curbed), or a minimum three (3) foot horizontal separation; except that pedestrian
crossings of traffic sisles ar�e pertnitbed for distances no greatier than 36 fieet if
appropriate landscaping, pavement markings, or contrasting pavement materials are
used. Walkways shall be a minimum of four (4) feet in width� exciusive of vehicle
overhangs and obatructions such as mailboxes, benches, bicycle racks, and sign
posts� and shall be in compliance with ADA standards. As indicated on the site plan� a
walkway has been provided in axordanoe with this section.
I[� Removal: Section 18.150.025 requires that a tree plan for the planting, removal
and protection of trees prepared by a certified arborist shall be provided with a
subdivision application. The tr+ee plan shall include identification of all existing trees,
identification of a program to save existing trees or mitigatie tr+ee removal over 12
inches in caliper, which trees are to be removed, protiection program defining
standards and methods that will be used by the applicant to protect trees during and
afber �onstruction. The applicanYs narrative states that five (5) deciduous tr+ees are within
the yar�d of the existing larger house. The two (2) smaller deciduous trees to the south of
this house will be removed for parking lot improvements. The remaining thnee (3) trees
measure 28 inches, 26 inches, and 70 inches, and will be retained. One (1) coniferous tree
in front of the smaller residence will also be removed. The applicant shall provide the cafiper
STAFF REPORT TO THE HEARING'S OFFlCER CUP �7-0006• THE RtTE CENIER PAGE 9 OF 15
caliper size of the these trees to be removed. If these trees are greater than 12-inch caliper,
the applicant shall provide m�igation in accordance with Section 18.150.025(B)(2).
Mixed Solid Waste and Recvclables Storage: Section 18.116 requires that new
construction incorporates functional and adequate space for on-sitie storage and - -
efficient coltection of mixed solid wasbe and source separa�ed Recyclables prior �o
pick-up and removal by haulers. The applicant must choose one (1) of the following
four (4) methods to demonstrate compliance: Minimum Standard, Waste
Assessment, Comprehensive Recycling Plan, or Franchised Hauler Review and Sign-
OfE The applicant will have to submit evidence or a plan which indicaties comptiance
with this section. Regardless of which method chosen, the applicant will have to
submit a writCen sign-off from the franchise hau(er regarding the facility location and
compatibility. The plans show the provision of a trash enclosur�e. The applicant shall
provide a written sign-offi from the hauler regarding the compatibility and location of this
facility.
PUBLIC FACfLiT1ES:
STREETS:
This site is located adjacent to SW Greenburg Road which is classfied as a major
collector street on the City's Transportation Plan Map. The City constructed full-width
improvements on Greenburg Road several years ago, which included the frontage of this
site. There is an existing concrete sidewalk and driveway into this site that was provided
as a part of the City project. The right-of-way (ROVI� in this area is adequate for a major
collector street No further dedications are needed or r�equired.
Traffic impacts from this development should be relativeiy insignficant, as most of the
clients of the site will travel by foot� bicycle or bus (Greenburg Road has bicycle lanes and
is on a Tri-Mei bus route). The applicant's narrative (Page 11) indicates that the typical
rafio of clients to vehicles is 10 to 1. There will also be a maximum of five employees on
the site during the day. Client use of the site is typically during the evening hours a�d
ovemight Based on this information, it is Staffs opinion that this proposal will not result in
a signficant increase in traffic on the street system and therefore no additional
improvements to the roadway system are needed.
The location of the driveway was selected by the City in anticipation of development of this
site and to be able to serve both subject tax lots (a joint driveway). Although the
signalized intersection at SW Tiedeman Avenue is within 100 feet of the driveway, the City
determined that the driveway location would function adequately for this site. During peak
driving hours, the stacking of southbound cars on Greenburg Road at the Tiedeman
Avenue signal will extend beyond the site driveway. During these times, the driveway will
likeiy be limited to right-in, right-out tuming movements.
S?AFF REPORT TO THE HEARING'S OFFICER CUP 97-0006- THE RRE CENTER PAGE 10 OF 1 S
warEe:
This site lies on the border between the City's service area and Tualatin Valley Water
District's service area. There are public water lines in SW Greenburg Road, two of which
� are operated by the City. There is a 16-inch water line adjacent to the east side of the site
• that could serve this development. The applicani's plan indicates that they propose to
_ obtain water service from the 16-inch water line. The applicant should contact Mike Miller
at 639-4171, ext. 395 for further information about obtaining water service from the City.
SANtTARY SE R•
The�e is an existing 8-inch public sanitary sewer line in SW Greenburg Road. The existing
house on this site is presently served. The applicant proposes to extend a new service
lateral from the main line to serve the new building. This will require an open-cut of the
street and a Street Opening Permit from the Engineering Department.
STORM D AINA(�F•
The proposed storm plan for this development indicates that storm water will be collected
and directed into a water quality facility in the northwest comer of the site. From there, the
water will be directed into the existing storm drainage line in SW Greenburg Road. The
open-cut for the storm connection will also need to be covered by the Street Opening
Penni�
.�.. STORM WATER Ql1ALITY•
The City has agreed to enforce SurFace Water Management {SWM) regulations
estab(ished by the Unified Sewerage Agency (USA) (Resofution and Order No. 91-47, as
amended by R&O 91-75) which require the construction of on-site water quality facilities.
The faciffies shall be designed to remove 65 percent of the phosphorus contained in 1 DO
perce�t of the storm water runoff generated from newty created impervious surfaces. In
addition, a maintenance plan is required to be submitted indicating the frequency and
method to be used in keeping the facitity maintained th�ough the year. Prio�to issuance of
a building permit, the app(icant shall submit plans and calculations for a water quality
facility that will meet the intent of R&Q 91-47. In addition, the applicant shall submit a
maintenance plan for the facility that must be reviewed and approved by the City prior to
issuance of the building permit.
As was s;ated previously, the applicant will provide an on-site water quality facility. An
extended dry detention pond is proposed and the preliminary plan appears to provide
adequate volume for treatment of this site.
The proposed private water quality facility will require a special inspection, to be carried
out by the developer's design engineer. Prior to final inspection for the site and/or the
building� the design engineer shall provide certfication to the Building Official that the
water quality facility was constructed in accordance with the approved plan.
STAFF REPORT TO THE HEARINGS OFFlCER CUP 97-0006- THE R1TE CEN7ER PAGE 11 OF 15
�RADING AND EROSION CONTROL:
USA R&O 91-47 also regulates erosion control to reduce the amount of sediment and '
other pollutants reaching the pubiic storm and surface water system resulting from
development, construction, grading, excavating, clearing, and any other activity which •
accelerates erosion. Per R8�0 91�7, the appficant is required to submit an erosion
control plan for City review and approval prior to issuance of City permits.
EXISTING OVERHEAD UTILITY LINES:
�OMPLIANCE WITH GOMPREHENSNE PLQN POLICIES:
Citizen Innut Policy Z.'!.1 provides the City will assure that citizens will be provided
an opportunity to participa�e in all phases of the planning and developme�t review
process. Policy 2.1.1 is satisfied bec�use a neighbofiood meeting was held by the
applicant on March 26, 1997, notice of the public hearing was provided to owners of
property within 250 feet and was published in a newspaper of generai circulation.
Watier Qualitv: Policy 4.2.1 provides that all development within the Tigard urban
planning area shall comply with applicable federal, state and regional waber quality
standards. Policy 4.2.1 is satisfied as the applicant constructed an on-site water quality
faality as required by Unfied Sewerage Agency Resolution and �rder No. 96�4.
Diversity of Housing: Policy 6.1.1 provides that the City shall provide an opportunity
for a diversity of housing densities and residential types at various price and rent
levels. Policy 6.1.1 is satisfied as this use fulfills an important need for homeless fiamilies
and individuals and helps provide the diversity of housing types contemplated by the
Comprehensive Plan.
Public Utilities; Policies 7.1.2� 7.3.1 and 7.4.4 provides that the City will require as a
condition of development approval that public wabe�, sewer, and sfiorm drainage will
be provided and designed to City standards and that utilities shall be placed
. underground.� Policies 7.1.2, 7.3.1 and 7.4.4 are satisfied as utilities shall be provided to
serve this proposal.
Fire Protection: Policy 7.6.1 states that Fire District shall review all new development
applications to ensure adequabe fire protection is available to serve each new
development Tualatin Valley Fire and Rescue was provided with a copy of the previous
development plan in compliance with Policy 7.6.1.
Street Imorovement�: Policy 8.1.1 provides that the City will plan for a safe and
efficient street and roadway sysbem that meets current needs and anticipated future
growth and development This policy is satisfied as SW Greenburg Road has been
constructed to major collector standards. �
STAFF REPORT TO THE HE/�R1NG'S OFFICER GUP 97-0006• TNE RlTE CENTER PAGE 12 OF 15
Street Imcrovements. Poticy 8.1.3 sfiates that the City will require the following as a _
precondition of approval:
- 1. Development shall abut a dedicated street or have other adequate access;
. 2. Street right-of-way shall be dedica�ed where the street is substandard in width;
- 3. The developer shall commit to construction of the streets, curbs, and
sidewalks to City standards withi� the developmen�
4. The developer shall participate in the improvement of existing streets, curbs,
and sidewalks to the extent of the development's impacts; and
5. Street improvements shall be made and street signs or signals shall be
provided when the development is found to creatie or intensify a traffic hazard.
This poiicy is satisfied as the City has already constructed full-width street improvements on
SW Greenburg Road.
SECTION V: STAFF AND AGENCY COMMENT�
Tualatin Valley Fire and Rescue has reviewed the proposal and has offered the
following comments:
Plans are not approved at this time. The applicant shall address the following plan notes
and re-submit plans for review and approval: �
Access roads shall be within 150 feet of all portions of the exterior wall of the first story of
the building as measured by an approved route around the exterior of the building. An
approved tumaround is required if the remaining distance to an approved intersecfing
roadway, as measured along the fire apparatus access road, is greater tha� 150 feet
(UFC Sec. 902.2.1). �
Fire apparatus access roads shall be of an all-weather surface that is easily
distinguishable from the surrounding area and is capable of supporting not less than
12,500 pounds point load (wheel load) and 50,000 pounds live load (gross vehicle weight).
. (UFC Sec. 902.2.2.2).
The inside tuming radius and outside tuming radius shall not be less than 25 feet and 45
feet respectfully, as measured from the same center point (UFC Sec. 902.2.2.3).
Where fire apparatus access roadways are not of sufficient width to accommodate parked
vehicles, "No Parking" signs shall be installed on one (1) or both sides of the roadway and
in tumarounds as needed. {UFC Sec. 902.2.4). Signs shall read "NQ PARKING - FIRE
LANE - TOW AWAY ZONE, ORS 98.810' and shall be installed with a clear space above
ground level of seven (7) feet. Signs shall be 12 inches wide by 18 inches high and shall
have black or red letters and border on a white background (UFC Sec. 901.4.5.(1)(2) & (3)).
S�AF�REPq2T T�THE HEAF2ING'S OFFlCER CUP 97-0006- THE RfT'E CEHTER PAGE 13 OF 15
Fire apparatus access roadway curbs shall be painted yellow and marked "NO PARKING
FIRE LANE" at each 25 feet. Lettering shall have a stroke of not less than one (1) inch
wide by six (6) inches high (UFC Sec. 901.4.5.2). .
The minimum number of fire hydrants for a building shall be based on the required fire
flow prior to giving any credits for fire protection systems. There shall not be less than one
(1) fire hydrant for the first 2,000 gallons per minute (GPM) required fire flow and one (1)
additional fire hydrant for each 1,000 GPM or pofion thereof over 2,000 GPM. Fire
hydrants shall be evenly spaced around the building and their locations shall be approved
by the Chief(UFC Sec. 903.4.2.1).
No portion of the exterior of a commercial building shall be located more than 250 feet
from a fire hydrant when measured in an approved manner around the outside of the
building and along an approved fire apparatus access roadway (UFC Sec. 903.4.2.1).
The required fire flow for the building shall not exceed 3,000 gallons per minute (GPM) or
the available GPM in the water delivery system at 20 per square inch (psi). A woricsheet
for calculating the required fire flow is available form the Fire Marshal's office (UFC Sec.
903.3).
Approved fire apparatus access roadways and fire fighting water supplies shall be
installed and operational prior to any other consVuction on the site or subdivision (UFC
Sec. 8704). -
The fire district would oppose the variance on reduction of parking. Illegally parked
vehicles cause problems during fire fighting.
Unified Sewerage Agency has reviewed the proposal and has offered the fopowing
comments:
Sanitarv Sewer. The development should be provided with a means of disposal for
sanitary sewer. The means of disposal should be in accordance with R&O 96-44 (Unfied
Sewerage Agency's Construction Design Standards, Jufy 1996 edition). Engineer should
verify sanitary sewer is available to up-hill adjacent p�operties, or extend service as
required by R&� 9fi-44.
Storm Sewer. The development should have access to public storm sewer. Engineer
should verify that public storm sewer is available to up-hill adjacent properties, or extend
storm service as required by R8�0 96-44. Hydraulic and hydrological analysis of storm
conveyance system is necessary. If downstream storm conveyance does not have the
capacity to convey the volume during a 25-year, 24hour storm event, the applicant is
responsible for mitigating flow.
Water Qualitv: Developer should provide a water quality facility to treat the new
impervious surface being constructed as part of this development.
STAFF REPORT TO THE HEARING'S OFFICER CUP 97-0006- 7HE RRE CEM'ER PAGE 14 OF 15
The City of_Tigard Building Division indicated the following: The proposed building
will cross two (2) property lines. The app(icant shall consolidate the properties into one (1)
parcel,
` The City of Tigard Maintenance Services Division indicated the following: The
- applicant should consider not to "blind" tee into the storm piping at finro (2} locations on
site. On site detention pond is private. Suggest sanitary cleanout between the bui�ding
and street.
PGE has reviewed this application and has offered no comments or objections.
-- ,�{����f3�.,,, ��� .�.0.� - -
PREPARED BY: William D'Andrea DATE
Associate Planner, AICP
J�ne 27 1997
APPROVED BY: Rict�ard Bewersdorff DATE
Planning Manager
i:lcurpin�willlcup96-07.dec
STAFF REPORT TO THE HEARING'S OFFICER CUP 97-0006- THE WTE CENTER PAGE 15 OF 15
awr �nttr�d�111d n�u�u
�
�
-• -
t••�i� . • ' • ♦ 4 ' • �,,t� • �� .�'
� ' • ° O � . •• ���" ..���•.
� w . �-' � ',
� , , O �
.i �
� � C '1' •' a�=ioi •` �
� � ' - - �
�
'.I
b� O Pr�� � .,..� . �i . � .
c� , �: � .--- . ; .`"� : . . . . p
�.. � O. . . '. �'`, .�
� � , I r-- — 3' .
� � • ' t i , '/cl • ' I
3 � ' - �. �J • �.v a,... —
� � � -; � �__� � . �
� " . � O � �x ������x
� O � ,,: � i �� ~ 8
� �— �� � ��� � �
. -� . � ���
� � �� o
_��.. � � !� . � ! � � �
, , ,�� �
... . �.. _ _ , � { g�
�
�► � � ; �
� s es D '. L� ; � . . F.�Q�= �. .
� ' � . . . � � 6
� � m • � _� «_ _� � '���
� Z � � - — � . � � �s �
� . _ � � � �y �
v� $ f �•�I —'� � � �
, �! ��� �
. �, � �, , ,
. � $ �
. '. fi �
. , �
--�.
-`--- ---- —--- '
CITY OF TIGARD PLANNING DIVISION
. '. '
- �
. �� `
�
g� SHADY W
� � ;
� :
i �
I '
i
i �
�
i ;
� E
� �� � �
�, ��� � � �
] SUBIECT _ ,.- ,
P CELS-> � � '
� `
+ . � ;
� ' c� :
� � '
_ .
�� :
�
� ,�
� .
C� .
f �
:�'-
I �`�— �
0
; ��
;.�.�
._ �
�U '
� ; �
� �
� � ;
�� ; �
_ _
- � � N , CUP 91-0006/VAR 91-0004
A : , , � , � , � .
---�- � NE RI E CEH ER � �
.
� � �Xk�I B�� ���
Kim Brown NOTICE OF FINAL ORDER BY THE HEARING'S OFFICER
RE: 7/7/97 PUBLIC HEARING ITEM NO.2.3
9020 SW Burnham Street THE RITE CENTER
Tigard OR 97223 cuP s�-000s
Keith Liden
Mckeever Morris, Inc.
209 SW Oak Street, Suite 200
Portland OR 97204
Sid Scott
1227 SW Spring Garden
Portland OR 97219
Kira Govshtein
8335 SW 64th Avenue
Portland OR 97219
Govstein, Gennady & Kira
14735 SW Daphne Court
Beaverton OR 97007
Interfaith Outreach Services
PO Box 230821
Tigard OR 97281-0821
�
I
.
CONDITIONAL USE APPLICATiON
13125 SW Hall B/vd., Tigard, OR 97223 (503) 639-4171 FAX: (503) 684-7297
CITY Of TIGARD
PRE-APP. HELD WITH:
GENERAL INFORMATION DATE OF PRE-APP.: Z / 97
Property Address/Location(s): ��Js7�/���.g� J� FOR STAFF USE ONLY
ij�(��'�.�'������ ��•
� �-, �, Case No.(s): C4�/��-OQ'�(y
Tax Map &Tax Lot#(s):_�.7 + ��� , T�. -�--�4-�
Other Case No.(s): VA Q 9�-000�
y'�'`''�`� Receipt No.: j�� l[>�4�JED ,
� �
Site Size: �� � ��'� Application Accepted By:`-b.lcoet�
�periy Owner/Deed Holder(s)i: Ji'Jr�T��/�/z�! c°�'�7,2�r4�1,( Date: ���5"�7
��(i1�fl;C'C..� � ���` �r� `' O
Address: �`" ��X �-,����I Phone: ��r� �E � �g��3��
� �/
� � ; G C ,,-r ' Z�
Ciry: �1(�, �`r� , J� Zip: r� � Date Determine To Be o lete:
Applicant': "�A!'J� � � ' `,�
Address: Phone:
Comp Plan/Zone Designation:
City: Zip:
'When the owner and the applicant are different people, the applicant CIT Area
must be the purchaser of record or a lessee in possession with written Rev.6129/96 i:'�curpin�rnasters�cua.doc
authorization from the owner or an agent of the owner. The owner(s)
must sign this application in the space provided on the back of this
form or submit a written authonzation with this application.
PROPOSALSUMMARY
The owners of record of the subject property request Conditional REQUIRED SUBMITTAL ELEMENTS
Use approval to allow (please be specific): �(� ` ��t`E%
� A lication Elements Submitted:
I�v��C«�S ���.t��-� ,� ap
❑ Application Form
p Owner's Signature/Written Authorization
p Title Transfer Instrument or Deed
� Site/Plot Plan (8'/:"x 11") �� �fY���s
(#of copies based on pre-app check list)
p Applicant's Statement ������
(�t of copies based on pre-app check list)
p Filing Fee$1,615.00
1
. ,
List any VARIANCE, ScNSITIVE LANDS PERMI7, OR OTHER LAND USE ACTIONS to be considered as part of this
application:
�/',UI�L�.qn�C� � �� ��/'�l��,ti�` ���G'�; C��,l�;��.C-" /`� �'�2C' � -'4� i��C�
(/�4���q .� - �� �j�= r s��� �rz� scr��4�.�� �✓��2e �� -�c; ��
�������
APQIiCANTS:
To cansider an application complete, you will need to submit ALl. of the REQUIRED SUBMITTAL ELEMENTS as
described on the front of this application in the"Required Submittal Elements" box.
(Dstailed Submittal ReGuirement Information she�ts can be obtained, upen request, for all types of Land Use Applications.)
THE APPLICANT(S) SHALL C�RTIFY THAT:
• The above rpauest does not violate any deed restrictions that may be attached to or imposed upon the subjec;
proger�r•
• If the apolication is granted, the applicant will exercise the rights granted in accordance with the terms and subject to all
the concitions and limitations of the approval.
• All of�he above statements and the statements in the plot plan, attachments, and exhibits transmitted herewith, are true;
and the applicants so acknowledge that any permit issued, based on this application, may be revoked if it is found that
any such statements are false.
• The applicant has read the entire contents of the application, including the policies and criteria, and understands the
requirements for approving or denying the applica6on.
SIGNATURES of each owner of the subject property.
DATED this � day of '� 19�"���
� /1 �, �
,
, ��' �
Owner's Sigriat Owner's Signature
i '
Owner's Signature Owner's Signature
2
1
.
CITY OF TIGARD
._ . _ .
_;,, _ �.� . ,,..,:r .._..._ ;..,_ . ;.-, ;��:��- :;�� -�.,�. .
,�::
. '£ . : . �REG4N
* .-.. . z_ .>.: _ e =.� _.s�� ai:e ,..±� =.a.. ;•r� +�%��'.
May 15, 1997
Jim Rapp
McKeever/Morris, Inc.
722 SW Second Ave., Suite 400
Portland, OR 97204 ��� '� ;.Y - �
.: :_ F _ � _ .�._ Re: CUP 97-0006 �. _ . _ _
;
. - .._ - .l�S�' " L _
� � . � � ' _ .. ., i:.,�f ' "
Dear Mr. RaPP: , - . r �.
�,� ,y .. -,� �� �
�x.:s - - � . - . - .. . ;,..a. .
Y�� � - � This letter is to inform you that your application for Conditional ,�;� � � ����.
��'�� ��� � Use Review (CUP 97-0006} is considered complete and has `��` '� ' � =,�
�.::
. � been accepted by the Planning Department. � - ��=•
' _ . .. . :..4:'S,.fE�:',
.. - .. . 'r`>
. If you have any questions conceming this information, please �?# - � �
:� :.: ,-._. .,. <�,� - .;..
. feel free to contact me at{503)639-4171. ,.u.�- � .
;;�:
- `�:.
Sincerely, - _ ",:�:
�
K
" x':4 `� ,� - '°'
� �/���.- ���� _ .� _ . � - . .�._ � ;
. �� . .
. ��. . �� �_ � �� .�� � _r
L...w,is�' ..�y,...: yx.v. .rr�.+. ,y,,;s�. .R;.s..ie,wur..,..
.w i '
William D'And�ea
Associate Planner, AICP
��,��ma,ps�-os.nz
c. CUP 97-0006 land use file
Kim Brown (Interfaith Outreach Services)
13125 SW Hall Blvd., Tigard, OR 97223(503)639-4171 TDD(503)684-2772
. '
,
� �
� ;
CITY OF TIGARD
Comrnui:�ty,Development
Shapiitg/��detterCommunity
PROPOSAL DESCRIPTION
FILE NO(S): CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT[CUPI 97-0006
VARIANCE NARI 97-0004
FILE TITLE: THE RITE CEHTER
APPLICANT: Interfaith Outreach Services OWNER: Same
PO Box 230821
Tigard, OR 97281
(503) 598-0359
REQUEST: A request for the following development applications: 1) Conditional Use approval
to allow the construction of a 36-bed homeless facility; 2) Variance request to allow
10 parking spaces where 14 spaces are required; and 3) Variance request to
allow an 8-foot side yard building setback whereas, 10 feet is required.
LOCATION: 11070 and 11130 SW Greenburg Road; WCTM 1S1 35CA, Tax Lot 2500 and
2600. Eastern terminus of SW Greensburg Road and SW Tiedeman Avenue.
ZONE: Residential, 12 Units Per Acre; R-12. The R-12 zone allows single-family
attached/detached residential units, multiple-family residential units, residential
care facilities, mobile home parks and subdivision, public support services, family
day care, home occupation, temporary use, residential fuel tank, and accessory
structures, among other uses.
APPLICABLE
REVIEW
CRITERIA: Community Development Code Sections 18.54.050, 18.100, 18.102, 18.106,
18.108, 18.130 and 18.164.
CIT: East CIT FACILITATOR: List Available Upon Request
PHONE NUMBER: (503)
------------------------------------------------------------------------------
------------------------------------------------------------------------------
DECISION MAKING BODY
DATE COMMENTS DUE: MOIIdBY-lune2,1991
STAFF DECISION DATE OF DECISION:
PLANNING COMMISSION DATE OF HEARING: TIME: 7:30
X HEARINGS OFFICER DATE OF HEARING: 7/14/97 TIME: 7:00
CITY COUNCIL DATE OF HEARING: TIME: 7:30
------------------------------------------------------------------------------
------------------------------------------------------------------------------
PROJECT RELATED COMPONENTS AVAILABLE FOR VIEWING IN THE PLANNING DIVISION
X VICINITY MAP LANDSCAPING PLAN _ NARRATIVE X
X ARCHITECTURAL PLAN SITE PLAN X OTHER _
STAFF CONTACT: William D'Andrea Planning Division (503) 639-4171 x315
CUP 97-0006 THE RITE CENTER PROPOSAUREQUEST FOR COMMENTS
May 6, 1997
��
CITY OF TIGARD
Jim Rapp OREGON
McKeever/Morris, Inc.
722 SW Second Ave., Suite 400
Portland, OR 97204
Re: Notice of Incomplete Application Submittal
Dear Mr. Rapp:
The Planning Division has conducted a preliminary review of Conditional
Use (CUP) 97-0006, an application for a 36-bed homeless facility, and have
found that certain application materials were not provided with the submittal.
The Planning Division is unable to continue processing the application
pending submission of the following items and plan notes:
1. Floor plan of the house converted to the office for Interfaith Outreach
Services (IOS). Clarification of the nature of the I�S office use.
�ffice use associated with the functioning of the RITE Center only is
allowed, general offices for IOS is not allowed.
2. Explanation of the Child Development Center day care facility. Will
this only be available for residences of the center?
3. Identfication of the type and size of the existing trees on site.
4. Does the application include request for approval of phase II?
If you have any questions conceming this information, please feel free to
contact me at (503) 639-4171.
Sincerely, ,
l/t/�-�:C���,�+ �C
William D'Andrea
Associate Planner, AICP
i:�CUrpinlwilllaip97-06.Itr
c: CUP 97-0006 Land Use File
Kim Brown (Interfaith Outreach Services)
13125 SW Hall Blvd., Tigard, OR 97223 (503)639-4171 TDD (503)684-2772
. �^�
r •
,� �
� McKeever/1�Torris, Inc.
� -
O � • • � ' ' ' •
RITE CENTER
PREPAREDFOR
INTERFAITH OUTREACH SERVICES
BY
MCKEEVER/MORRIS, INC.
722 S.W. 2ND AVE., STE. 400
PORTLAND, OR 97204
(503) 228-7352
AND
VAN LOM/EDWARDS� AIA
34 NW FIt�ST, STE. 309
PORTLAND, OR 97209
(503) 226-0590
APRI� 24, 1997
-
I
r
. �
GENERAL INFORMATION
� Land Development Application
Conditional Use for a 36-bed homeless facility.
Variance to allow 10 parking spaces where 14 spaces are required.
Variance to allow an 8-foot side yard building setback where 10 feet is required for a multi-family
use.
Location
11070 and 11130 S. W. Greenburg Road (Tax Map 2S lE 35CA,Tax Lots 2500 and 2600}
Zoning Designation
R-12 (Multiple Family/Medium Density)
Applicant/Owner
Kimberly D. Brown, Executive Director
Interfaith Outreach Services
P. O. Box 230821
Tigard, OR 97281
Phone: (503) 598-0359
Fax: (503) 620-9378
Applicant's Representative
Jim Rapp
McKeever/Morris, Inc.
722 SW Second Ave., Suite 400
Portland, OR 97204
Phone: (503) 228-7352
Fax: (503) 228-7365
Y:
::')
April 24, 1997 Interfaith Outreach CU Application
Page- 1
4
PROJECT BACKGROUND
. Site Description
The property consists of two tax lots. It is located on the east side of Greenburg Road (Figure 1).
• Two single family residences are on the north and south sections of the property along with
detached garages for each. A gravel parking area lies in between the two houses. Lawn and
several trees are generally found along the perimeter of the property. Access for both homes is
provided by one large driveway apron.
Surrounding Land Uses
The adjacent properties on the east side of Greenburg Road are also zoned R-12. I-P zoning is
located on the west side of the street (Figure 1). The R-12 properties are developed with multi-
family residences that are condominiums. Driveways serving these residences are located on either
side of the subject property. The location of the property and these surrounding residential
buildings are shown on the topography map (Figure 2). Light industrial activities, including
warehousing and automotive repair, are located on the west side of Greenburg Road.
Transportation Facilities and Services
Greenburg Road is a major collector street. It is fully improved with two travel lanes, continuous
center turn lane, bicycle lanes, and sidewalks. Regular Tri-Met bus service is available on
Greenburg Road (Route #78), providing connections to Washington Square, the Tigard Transit
Station, and other destinations.
Interfaith Outreach Services
Interfaith Outreach Services (IOS) is a private non-profit organization which has operated
successfully for more that eight years in a loaned facility. Its mission is to provide temporary
housing and assistance to homeless families and individuals in eastern Washington County. The
Board of Directors for Interfaith Outreach is made up of business, church and community leaders
working together to provide this service.
Many people today live paycheck to paycheck. In the event of a crisis, some simply do not have
the families, resources or skills to recover from a significant financial setback. IOS provides
assistance to those in need with the tools to get back on their feet. IOS clients are those who show
a determined effort to get their lives in order. There are tough application requirements and
mandatory steps people must follow tv maintain their eligibility in.the program. The goal is to get
people back on their feet as quickly as possible.
Presently, the shelter and child development program are located in the basement of the Tigard
United Methodist Church. The IOS office is in another location. IOS has received a Community
Development Block Grant to purchase a permanent site for the RITE (Residential Independence
Training and Education) Center.
;,
April 24, 1997 Interfaith Outreach CU Application
Page-2
�
- � • ' ' �i����� 11�■■■■ s
�� ���1111��: ��I�� '
\\. •Y � ,�� •
� �� �
_-__ . �`. � � � �
. , � ���-- �
.•�� , ' :- °
�r�-��� --`; ` • ' "'�i' • /
y� .�.: ; _ ■ � � 1���`��
ii i� '�' � ■ �
��,111� r /�
��� -�=�:.�A
' �.. � � � ,��:
, � �� — ��
�1��*P�� .�'�. �• � � �k°.i�.
. 1 �
�e v
a
.� -
r � �
�
�r��R�:o !��' �► � �'�
����ED �i i � I��f�� • JI� �� _
������ ■■ ��■ ������� �- �� _ �����" `T�� :�. �, F<;: � ��
c:z� H .r'' � � 7� •�- � �' f _ -� �
�!*:,E+ � � � �';a1 � : � t� t , .�,
� = �� - ���j �_ _ �� �� � �:�r�
�•' ����I� �'�- i� _- � ��n
r f �.� ��r_� �r�
� �'�� (�� �ili ..�}`.�: !R.- �i�f/:i ��� 1�■t� V�.'.'1�11",��
���....r..�..i ..�r.l+��
„�.:- � � �, 11�" �1 �� -� ��
����iit��a ��� !�� ■.,,_ __ �� _�., �.
- ��,� � ��: =� —: e�: :e
: :�� ' <<. .:= ' � � �j�� �:�i�i►L�
i. .�r: ,i ,� ��:�� ■ �: � �W��
' ' Y.-� II � � � -
�i��// ��i. � >�`.` �i ���'e=����[� �� �` �� �
..� . � � •s � � �, I j�—� �� ',� � �_ �
�u a!'�a � , �� �� ■ •■ 1 ♦ � �
�`:��y" �� ����� ~1����� �, , �� �Le �
_ _s�, '�
�,1��� , �:� ���1���: !���`: �'-M.� �'
K ���� �� _ L ��v •'.. , ♦
;, ��r '•�''��/%��� �� �'I�
:�_;�;: . �, ����,:� ��_� ■� �
� ,� � � �' S��i���••�. w_!?,,�a,►� � �� ��'
'��:� � ���:�F �. ��t�►•sie � ■� �
� ' ���■u�1111111.��.��.,, r�:ti.'.;,;■■f: _- . ■■ .�
�.� _ � �.,., -..�... � � .
�:x. �+ � � r/.. • � ♦
t. ■ �► `•�v, �.� `1���`��•L
r.-° ♦
�� +�r :�;v�/. �:���.� 'c:;`��,�+
.
.
♦ �►�
♦
... ♦ .
r i'� I► �
� .
�
.. �C ♦
� �� `C ������
I/� ., IS � � �
, �
`:.
� �1 .••, .
. .�`
� �S* •, I>� : � -
� • - . �,�, �� ��;�L, '� ``l•r� �' " .�
. � • • � , ��� � ^� •'
" ,� ��/1 ' �� �►
„ � . , �.,-' :° .�%`•r♦ '�1j ,�� + �+ .
� ' ' � s
; y y� �� ,�,►. = , �, ,
y�i�' ,�. . �/ �� .�,r: ►;�� s'�,I`�,��'..� ', ,��\�
, .,y . ,;,� ;�, � ;.� � �. . ` � .,� ��.. �� / �
. �/� � � i'�iy�,� /� P�� '� � � ��,,!►� I
,� , ` � d,�:�'' � � o . �;:�::: � ►
� N / // /i��: I �• ♦ I .
. -
��� . .
- . .
� • • • � • � •
• ,
.
, •
. � .. • � .. �
� ' � yy�� �. ,
160.9 � _ .– ' � `•,�• X 157.6 � �, � � I�
x � x 157. 1 x
D � '__-- � 156.2x O ���_.
' � O X 161.7 _ -- �
_. ��'� 156.4 �' /
; 158.9 x 158.3 ' 162.7 '_� q �,��
oCB X 156. X /I56: .•�•=�=' "_ -- IE
. ;� � .
� � .� x 161.`3 �__,�:�— 169
x
1 � �
So .. .
;61.1 �•' 161.1 fb� o X / u$ '
x
! �.- �
172.2
I � � MH o / MH �
/''� , � p+►
'K xf61.1 }7�
6� 165.4
CB � CBo ' �CBx
/
� -
•�
; Q 10 � X � —
L o � X��o i7o. �
� MH i 174,8
� p / X
p � a
i OB % _ �175.7 �►'�� � NORTH
i B , X f
� I—`,� LEGEND
�
�
,
� X 167.3 ��
� ; — � � Site Boundary
x167.3 oC8 C p � '
CB x
M H M� � � 1 �
X1779 1 �
�\
!� �
DAKO TA x 178.1 S T, B Q � >X 181.0 pp�H Source:CirvolTraard
S O MH. �
e�' Q � Q FH � IB� � 1I
� . P � p(",B McKnver/Morris. I�.
72!s.w Srrord A�enne
1 Srdr���
O � C J p�ilaw�O�on 97?!N
� � � OMH /��3j„snat
�
i779 �o MH FH x Q 1"=100'-0" Figure 2
P, p �S�
� � ° X�x eo Topographic Map
� � - 'Contour Inferva!is 2 feet
2
°� � X Conditional Use Application
\ a oB � `' i � � RITE Center
April 24, 1997 Interfaith Outreach CU Application
Page-4
PROPOSAL DESCRIPTION
Major Project Elements
_ Development of the proposed RITE Center includes the following major elements:
• Removal of the southern dwelling and garage;
• General clean-up of the property including removal of dilapidated fencing and storage
buildings
• Conversion of the northern residence into a small office for IOS;
• Construction of a 5,000 square foot building which will include 24 beds (6 guest rooms),
common kitchen and dining facilities; child development center, and managers office;
• A second phase that will include 12 beds (3 addition guest rooms), storage, some
additional common facilities, and a manager's apartment for a total of 7,630 square feet;
• Landscaped area and small playground;
• A new wood fence around the majority of the site to prove screening and privacy;
• Ten vehicle and four bicycle parking spaces;
• A small monument sign near the driveway; and
• One driveway entrance to Greenburg Road.
These improvements are illustrated in Exhibit A- Sheets A1 through A8 which are attached.
Operation of the Facility
The RITE Center will house 24 homeless individuals who will be a mix of singles, childless
couples, and families. Phase II of the project will expand the center to house up to 36 individuals.
All persons will be screened before admittance into the Center and Self-Sufficiency Program and
will be required to participate in the program ad follow center policies (see attached program
description in Exhibit B). The center will be open fro persons living there temporarily from 5:00
p.m. to 8:00 a.m. seven days a week, year-round. In addition, the facility will house the Child
Development Center which will operate Monday through Friday from 8:00 a.m. to 5:00 p.m. An
after school program will also be provided. The IOS Health Clinic will be provided using medical
volunteers who will be available during scheduled hours. Phase II of the project will include a
clothes closet and food pantry for walk-in clients. The closet will have a specific operating
schedule, and it will be staffed by trained volunteers.
Interfaith Outreach Services Of�ce
Regular of�ce operations directly related to the center and Self-Sufficiency program services will
be moved on the site to enhance services and supervision for the RITE Center. Office hours will
be Monday through Friday from 9:00 a.m. to 5:00 p.m. The office will accommodate a maximum
of five employees. All administrative and direct client services staff directly responsible for the
RITE Center operation will be housed in the office. All clients will first come to the office to be
screened in order to obtain service provided by the RITE Center.
April 24, 1997 Interfaith Outreach CU Application
Page-5
LAND USE APPROVAL CRITERIA ANALYSIS
The applicable criteria in the City of Tigard Community Development Code are stated or
summarized below, followed by a response for each criterion.
18.54 R-12: Multiple-Family Residential
Section I8.54.040 lists group residential as a conditional use.
The proposed development is a group residential use, requiring a conditional use permit. Group
residential uses are defined in Section 18.42.020 A.5 as a multi-family use which typically
includes such uses as retirement homes, boarding houses, cooperatives and halfway houses. This
interpretation of the code has been verified by the city staff.
Section 18.54.050 Dimensional Requirements
The applicable dimensional requirements in the R-12 zone are:
• Minimum front yard setback - 20 feet.
• Minimum side yard setback- 10 feet.
• Minimum rear yard setback- 20 feet.
• Maximum building height- 35 feet.
• Maximum site coverage - 80 percent
• Minimum landscaped area - 20 percent
As illustrated in Exhibit sheet A3, the proposed facility meets all of these standards with the
exception of the northern side yard setback of the existing residence. The justification for a setback
variance is discussed later in this application.
18.130 Conditional Use
Section I S.I30.040 Approval Standards
I . The site size and dimensions provide adequate area for the needs of the
proposed use.
As demonstrated in application exhibits, the proposed center meets all of the dimensional
requirements for minimum site size,building setbacks, and landscaping. The one exception
is the side yard setback for the northern residence. Because the residency will change from
single family (which requires a 5-foot side yard) to an office associated with a multi-family
use (which requires a 10-foot side yard), a variance is necessary to address this change in
circumstances.
2 . The characteristics of the site are suitable for the proposed use considering
size, shape, location, topography, and natural features.
The property has an irregular shape, but the building is designed to fit well within the
property and not have a detrimental visual impact on the surrounding properties. The
location of the center is appropriate with direct access to a fully-improved major collector
street which has regular bus service.
April 24, 1997 Interfaith Outreach CU Application
Page-6
3 . All required public facilities have adequate capacity to serve the proposal.
All of the necessary street improvements have been made, and all utilities needed for the
center are available.
4. The applicable requirements of the zoning district are met except as modified
by this chapter.
With the exception of the side yard setback variance noted in this application, the proposed
use meets all of the applicable requirements of the R-12 zone and the conditional use approval
criteria.
5. The supplementary requirements set forth in Chapter I8.114, Signs, and
Section I8.120.180, Approval Standards, if applicable, are met
Approval standards for signs and site development review are addressed below.
6. The use will comply with applicable policies of the comprehensive plan.
Comprehensive plan policies are implemented by Community Development Code (CDC)
requirements which are addressed in this application. The plan does include the following
housing policy and implementation strategy which apply to this application:
6.1.1 The city shall provide an opportunity for a diversity of housing densities and
residential rypes at various price and rent levels.
An implementation strategy states:
6. The city shall provide for opportunities for proposals to develop specialized housing for
the area's senior citizens and handicapped based on the needs of these groups by:
b. Allowing special use housing for these groups in all development districts...
The proposed center fulfills a very important need for homeless families and individuals in
the area. It helps provide the diversity of housing types contemplated by the Comprehensive
Plan.
Section 18.I30.150 C. 17 has additional standards for group residential uses
a. Applicable zones are residential
The R-12 zone allows group residential as a conditional use.
b . Minimum lot size - S,D00 square feet
The property is approximately 31,360 square feet.
c. Minimum setbacks and
d. Height limitations
As discussed in this application, all setback and height requirements are met except for the
northern side yard of the northern house.
April 24, 1997 Interfaith Outreach CU Application
Page-7
_— _. � _. �.�
e. Compliance with all state requirements
, The facility will comply with all applicable state requirements and building codes.
f. Off-street parking
This is addressed below.
18.120 Site Plan Development Review - Approval Standards
Section 18.120.180 lists the chapters of the CDC that should be considered during the review of a
conditional use or site development review application. The relevant chapters and code sections are
listed and addressed below.
18.I00 Landscaping and Screening
18.100.035 Location of Street Trees
This section contains requirements for street trees, including size, spacing, dimensional
requirements, and relationships with adjacent facilities.
The proposed street trees are shown in Exhibit A5. They meet the city's size and spacing criteria.
18.100.070 Buffering and Screening - General Provisions
The buffer matrix in this section requires a 10 foot wide landscaped buffer area along the edge of
the property.
As shown in Exhibit A5, a 10-foot wide landscaped areas will surround the building. The typical
standards for this situation call for shrubs and trees to be planted within this area to provide some
degree of privacy and screening. Section 18.100.070 C. allows for alternative buffering which
performs as well as the standard requirements.
The buffering proposed (Exhibit AS) includes a 5-foot high fence along the sides and rear of the
site, trees on the south side, and lawn. This will perform as well or better than the standard buffer
in this situation for the following reasons:
• Much of the site currently has large mature trees around the perimeter (see Exhibit A2).
Planting more trees within a 10-foot wide space between the existing trees and the new
building will not only be crowded, but no additional screening benefit will be realized.
• The proposed trees along the south side will provide screening in places where large mature
trees are absent.
• Fencing in lieu of shrubs will provide immediate screening between the proposed center
and surrounding multi-family units. In addition, the fencing will provide the necessary
security for the children's play area on the north side of the center.
• The site is surrounded by driveways, parking, and trash enclosures. All of the
surrounding units are oriented with main windows and views toward Ash Creek or the
south. In this situation, proposed fencing will be a better screening solution than shrubs.
April 24, 1997 Interfaith Outreach CU Application
Page-8
18.100.120 Revegetation
Where natural vegetation has been removed through grading in areas nat affected by the
� landscaping requirements, revegetation of such areas is required.
, Much of the site has been disturbed in the past, and the proposed plan will result in over 48% of
the site being devoted to landscaping.
18.102 Visual Clearance Areas
Clear vision areas must be maintained between three and eight feet in height at road/driveway
intersections.
The landscaping near the driveway will be lawn and street trees which will satisfy this standard as
shown in Exhibit A5.
I8.106 Off-Street Parking and Loading Requirements �
Section 18.106.020 General Provisions—This section details the general parking requirements:
• Parking space dimensions of 8'8"x18 "
The proposed standard spaces are a119x 18 feet. .
• Handicapped parking
One handicapped space is proposed which meets state requirements for size. It also has easy
access to the front sidewalk and building entrances.
• Bicycle parking of 1 space per 15 required vehicle spaces
Four bicycle rack spaces will be provided near the entrance of the facility as shown in Exhibit
A3.
• Lighting that is directed from nearby residential uses
Two pole lights are proposed for the parking lot and walkway lights will also be provided as
shown in the site plan (Exhibit A3).
Section 18.106.030 A.6 requires one parking space per guest room and for each employee.
The two phases of the center will have a total of nine guest rooms. In addition, there will be
up to five employees during the day and fewer staff inembers during the remainder of the day
and night. Because 10 parking spaces are proposed, a variance is necessary. The
justification for the variance is provided later in this application.
Section 18.106.040 allows a reduction in the number of required parking spaces for a group
residential use that house elderly or handicapped individuals.
This is addressed as part of the variance request for parking below.
Section 18.106.050 includes standards for dimensions, access, location, and surfacing for parking
and loading areas.
April 24, 1997 Interfaith Outreach CU Application
Page-9
The proposed parking area will meet these standards because it will be paved and marked; the
two-way driveway will be a minimum of 24 feet wide; wheels stops or the equivalent will be
. provided; and storm water will be handled in a manner approved by the city engineer.
18.108 Access, Egress, and Circulation
Section 18.108.050 requires pedestrian walkways that are safe and convenient.
A separate walkway is proposed connecting the Greenburg Road sidewalk and the entrances for
the office and the center. Walkways will meet ADA requirements.
Section 18.108.070 requires a minimum driveway width on collectors streets of 20 feet.
The driveway will be over 23 feet wide.
I8.114 Signs
Section 18.114.130 B. allows one freestanding sign of up to 32 square feet per side.
The proposed freestanding sign will be less that the maximum size of 32 square feet. The final size
and design will be finalized in consultation with the surrounding neighbors to address concerns
about signs for the shelter.
IS.I50 Tree Removal
As shown on the site survey, several trees will need to be removed to construct the project. This
will be mitigated by the new trees proposed in the landscaping plan (Exhibit AS).
18.I64.120 Utilities
This section requires all overhead utility lines adjacent to a development to be placed underground.
Other than connecting to utilities that are available in the Greenburg Road right-of-way, no utility
work is proposed.
18.134 Variance
As noted above, two variances are requested. The applicable criteria in Section 18.134.050 are
listed below followed by separate findings which correspond to the variances for the side yard
setback and the number of parking spaces.
Criteria for Granting a Variance
1. The proposed variance will not be materially detrimental to the purposes of this title, be in
conflict with policies of the comprehensive plan, to any other applicable policies and
standards, and to other properties in the same zoning district or vicinity;
2. There are special circumstances that exist which are peculiar to the lot size or shape,
topography, or other circumstances over which the applicant has no control, and which are
not applicable to other properties in the same zoning district;
3. The use proposed will be the same as permitted under the title and city standards(and) will be
maintained to the greatest extent that is reasonably possible while permitting some economic
April 24, 1997 Interfaith Outreach CU Application
Page- 10
—
use of the land;
4. Existing physical and natural systems, such as but not limited to tra�c, drainage, dramatic
' land forms, or parks will not be adversely affected any more that would occur if the
development were located as speci�ed in the title; and
� S. The hardship is not self-imposed and the variance requested is the minimum variance which
would alleviate the hardship.
Side Yard Setback Variance
The proposed variance setback to allow a 8-foot side yard setback rather than the required 10-foot
setback is justified based on the following findings:
1. The purpose of setback requirements is to provide adequate light and air between buildings,
privacy, and to meet�re code requirements. The northern side of the building is adjacent to a
landscaped area and driveway that are part of the multi-family development which surrounds
the site. No buildings are, or will be directly north on the adjoining property.
2. The special circumstance is the fixed location of the building and the property line. As a
single family residence, the existing house meets the side yard setback standard of 5 feet. By
developing the remainder of the site as a multi-family use and converting the residence into an
office, the 10-foot standard now applies. Because the external appearance of the building
will not be materially altered or expanded, the 8-foat setback is appropriate.
3. An incidental office use that is related to a multi-family development is pernutted in CDC. All
other setback and dimensional requirements that apply to the facility will be met or exceeded.
4. The building has been in its present location for years without having an adverse impact upon
physical or natural systems. Purchasing additional land to the north would not change how
the land is actually developed - the existing house, driveway, and landscaping in between
would remain the same.
5. Compliance with the 10-foot standards would require removing or moving the building or
purchasing additional property. Either of these options would impose an severe hardship
with no benefit to the public or the adjoining property owner.
Parking Variance
The proposed variance to allow 10 parking spaces rather than the required 14 spaces is justified
based on the following findings:
1. The purpose of the parking standards in the CDC is to ensure that sufficient on-site parking is
provided for particular land uses so that parked vehicles related to the use do not cause
congestion or safety problems on public streets or properties nearby. The operation of the
center for the past eight years indicates that a very low percentage of clients have
automobiles. The typical ratio of clients to vehicles is 10 to 1. Based on this experience, we
anticipate that only four client spaces will be needed at any one time. The office will be open
with the maximum number of five employees during the day. In addition, clients using the
center will stay during the evening and will typically be gone during the day. Therefore, the
spaces will be shared to a certain extent by employees during the day and clients in the
evening.
Section 18.106.040 A.2. Group Care Residential Facilities, Group Residential and
April 24, 1997 Interfaith Outreach CU Application
Page- 11
Residential Homes, allows the approval authority to reduce the parking requirements for
group residential uses "... in housing developments for elderly or handicapped persons if
such reduction is deemed appropriate ..." The staff has interpreted this section to mean that
' group residential uses with other residents (i.e., homeless persons) do not qualify for this
exception provision.
� Because of the low ratio of automobiles to the number of clients, the principle of this CDC
section should apply to the center as well. Past experience has demonstrated that the
proposed 10 spaces will be sufficient to accommodate the use. Regular Tri-Met bus service
provides a viable alternative to the automobile for clients and employees. Greenburg Road is
completely improved with sidewalks and bike lanes between Washington Square and
downtown Tigard, giving clients and employees safe and convenient access to and from the
site on foot or by bicycle.
2. Because of the configuration of the parcel, the location of the existing house, and the
necessary facilities for making the center successful (e.g., child development center and
common area), providing parking beyond the needs of the facility will be very difficult to
provide.
3. Group residential is allowed as a conditional use in the R-12 zone.
4. Devoting less area to parking will have a positive impact on physical and natural systems
primarily by reducing the amount of storm water runoff and providing more landscaped area
than otherwise would be the case.
5. As stated above, the proposed center has shown that fewer parking spaces re needed that
other types of residential uses. The reduction of four spaces is a modest departure from the
normal code requirements.
CONCLUSION
The proposed RITE Center will provide an important community service. The existing center has
been a significant community asset. The proposal satisfies all of the relevant Community
Development Code criteria.
k1.HD/ACT doc 290
INTCU.290
April 24, 1997 Interfaith Outreach CU Application
Page- 12
Exhibit A
RITE Center Plans
.
�
�
��
. ��1 � G°� � �� C� C�1 �C�G°� ���
� ��c�r��ao��i Oo �a�r�c�ac��i � �r��o�c��
`�oga�co� 9 � �c�g�� -
�
W
V
C��4� �4DDi� SS i�OJ GT T �1"� I1�D�X �
ADD�88: 9W GREENBI:RG R�4D ARGHI?ECT9� AFGHITECT�y.e1V Lq�irEDW4RD8 AIA.PL. .u/J�
T�'�•���'� 34 NLl FIR6T AVEHUE. BU�TE 309 v {
PoFtsLl.ND.OREGGN 9�2m9 AI COVER SNEG?
d.JvER: INTEIFdlT4l OUTI�dU1 ECRNGED TEL:(5m317]6-059m A� EXI$TING SITE Si1R`/CY
PA.bOX$30021 FAX�l5O3)2ll-064� Q3 SITE PLAN
T�Ar�,o�co� Yn� AiTTL 91D 9GOTT A4 GRADINCs +U71LIT(ES V
TEL��5031 598-0359 �
FCx�.(5m3/670-93�B CLIENT REP13E9EN7ATI�� nc�ev[R,now�ie,wc. A5 LANDSGAPE PLAN
AiTV:KI^1DERLT D.DROLLN l77 9W S�GOMD AYE.,&JITE�Q0
PORTLAND.OREGCN 9�2m4 A6 PNdSE I FLOOR P�G,�{ A'
re��reo»��e-i3e1 Al PHABE 2 P�OOR PLAN L.L
Faw<5m3�Y7�•�369 A8 BUILDINGELEvATIONS � � t �
di7N:JIM IlArl°
9?RJGiURAL ENfiINEERB� WALKER/D'LORETO/YOINIC,INC. � �
WLLdh1ETTE PLNOC I'I.AZA
6470 6JL.I'1AGADAM AvEN4E,BUITE 3i0
Pol¢TLAND.OREGpV 91701 f I 1 Z
TEL:f50311b6-3930 ' `
FAx�1503)�6E-39J9 v � O
attN�DALE DILORETO
F"cGNG'�IGG��ELEG'R'C4L IN7ERFAC�ENGINE&iING.ING. LLJ F+ W
EhGItiEEeS� 6547 8E LAKE ROAD � � O
niLWAUKI�,OREGON 91777
tE�_�.l5031659-6394
- FGx�.l5m3)659�90I9 �/ L�
C'Tn: f..� � Q
GI`/:L EvG'�NEE45: :L.OLKEWD!LORETOR"CWIE.ING. u"', �
WIL_.V'7ETTE PMOC PLAZA � � �
6410 9L1.MACA(JCYI AVENUE,BI:ITE 360
PC�2fLM1D.OREGON �1701
TEL�(509)�6D•3930 � � �
Fax:[S031168•!9]�
pr-ti,Dd�E.^.I�ORE'.O
D Ii��CTO �' OJ CT �T�
gUl'�plNfi DE°?R'!'7ENT: 3n5 p1{)H.6�IGl�RD+�ILD�NG OEPdRT`"ENT pE9CRIPTION Lf LL10RK� GCNBTq1CTION OF 0 f�W CUlLCINCr I
T�GfWD,ON�ON 9111!
TEL:(909)i97•41TI
4TfN� Ou1LD�NG CODE� U6G,nl94 EDiTION Wi 1�96 OREGON STRUG11Rnl BPECi,4L'.r�DE
PLIA'IBING CODE: UPC.M�94 EDITION
O
PLd'N�NG DEPARTYEN': GITY OF itGAl�: I"LMNING DEPARTTIENT ELECTRIG CADE: NpL,�994 EDITION
13175 5W NAI.L DLVp. 1'¢CN\NIG.4 GO�E: llK,MA4 EDiTIQJ .
7iGypp,pI�GR1�Y173 HANDICAP GODE: ADA.WIDELINE6/OREGdJ b.END"EYTS
1EL:l50l/63�-41'1�
�� ZONI.^L'+C��A951FICATION� R-12. nI:LTI-FGH�.LT��IDE�'.4L I
.�,[y,TN DEPARTI'tEhT� IWLS1/1NGTCN CCWTY.OREGON aC�PSNC7� R.I
DEP4RTHE4T OF HEALTH 1 NWIMI 6ERVIGE9 CONbT1�JCTION T7PE� V•N I
ID9 K PIIi�T AVE. BEIg,^11C ZG71E�. 3 I � ♦�
FROST LIt�E: 'ib" �
N HILL6�01�,OI@EGCIV RpCF LOPD: 75 P9F/�L.•-P:iiDL
TE��lD09)6M-9TJ1
- 4TTNi TOOT H4�Eilp
s BITE,CRE,4 '2 AGI�E l313G3 8F.
a FiRE pEPARTMEM: NALATIN VALLE7 FIIQE REDCUE DLIILDING COYER?GE PMq9E L ID.M (Dp60 SF;
2066�BE BLdNTCN p41,C6E 7� 743f l�630 6FJ
d'. 40HA,OREGON O
� ��G03)64�•9E�� �D�Id19�I�ACE9 7��E', 569A f1��59BPi O
PHA6E 7�, 4DA�a (i5779 SF) 0
r N
FUBLIC WORGB CEP?RmENT; GIT7 OF ilCa,e,Rp; fiWaINEERING DEPPRn"iENT
' IeTREET9/SEWEQI �
m TIGMD,OREGON�1233 ALLOW4DLE dIILDING HEKar+T: !E FEET
7eL�l'�9J /+GTUAL BU�LDING WEI6NT� J4 FEET
� AiTN.
6 WATE:t pEPAR1MEN'.: GIT7 OF*IGARD
131Z6'�W'.t4LL CIVD. PdRKING PROVIDED� L STqNp4Fp BPACE6
TIGGRD,OREGGN�17T! I MdNDICGr BPACE
TEL:!'.lmD)�99-Illl 10 TOTq�,P�RKING 9PACE3
J0
4RN�
�� G40 Cd'�PANT. NORf`atIEBT NqTI1R6L GAG GOHPCtJT
I
� � 7]0 NJiI.]nd
N � POR?:.VJD.OREGON 91209
� ?EL:1503J Y71-1�Y!
�� ATTN�.EINIE du4RTZ
=a ELECTRIC Cd"�PdlrT� rOR�L+L1D GEN2fl.G�pL�T�Q1G
ro Ili�lulALnGN
� '�WTG-mEmb
Y PORTLhND,ORECsd�91]04 � � �
,o�! TEL:(503)�64-H6B� ,p
*Q. A'fN:^1AIQLE`vE 9iEvEN9 I�
\ �
a¢
O $ �
�
w Q
M
��' � �
�.e. 2a" cor,c cur r,r. _ ,s?��' ��
' (� TOPOGRAPHIC SURVEY ���
�
SITUATED IN THE N.E. 1 4 S.W. 1 4 ���
r� � 9 � �
SECTION 35, T. 1 S., R. 1 W., W.M.
5 � � �,:I CITY OF TIGAR �
� D
� � WASHINGTON COUNTY, OREGON
� � �
1�
SU�2`.'tYED: '�1ARCH 11, 199'
�R ��
�1�
II 5 87'41'01" W
� LEGE�vD
� If �..� GAR • . � . .
�1 J I . . . .. . . -
WOOD SANITARY SEIHER LIN�
FRAME , � �;� —SAN—
4 II\ RES. d �
tn
Q? U' —WAT— - WATER LME �
��„ p� II PLAA� --OHW— - ObERNEAD POWER L','IfS V
I � % - , APiD AtS 6' _ _ _ _ - S70RM SE'�PJER LiNE •QJ
FENCE SANITARY SEWER NOTES x N
I 9�� - �-��.. ASKETBALL NOOP. '. , - -- - �ENCELIN:. i./
. - . �`'. J � i �
_ 1 = 15 . 2� ' �. Q RIM ELEV. = 166.25' dQ - WATER V�a'.','_ � �
, 1 H = 'V 7• � � ,d/ -529 LE. 12' CONC IN S. = 157.19' o - GATCH 6A5�^: � �
1 4.' D:I. S �J, �� I.E. 12" CONC OUT N. = 157J5' �
1` 5 '� P�i R5Mcv6D `�jp� � W � O
`z� . S 24'57 20'� E �'� O -
�\� �� � ,,�����_�/14..40' 1 5 Scv T�,R M rd!iC�E V V
l �' 'la BQ I'�I"pVeT/t �E � AY Q RIM ELEV. = 160.66' `�'"-=SS \Ci_D C-.t3�aS.� LL1 O W
� ' I.E. 12" CONC IN S. = 153.3?' �
N 75'76'5 E � = O
� �1 2fi� ---� � I.E. 12" CONC OUT N. = 153.16' �~`y �� .�
It � �r.�, GRCSS/"" �� - D".��c);._ ?R�E � � Q
1 — � /
5, ^,, � _ � �
�� ���� . � � . �
� ��� cov�F=�o�s r��-
5' p, - N1�} ' ' ��6 �.93 -
or,?,��u�s + ' � 32•1 g°� i STORM DRAINAGE NOTES ~ C ~
��',_'r .ROn,! rERE - � �� r . '�' - SG^d
�.C' F'.ELD LCCA?fD 1; Ol RIM ELEV. = 171.94' � - UTILiTY Pp�E
� �
� N 1 T24�04�� W I.E. 18" CONC IN SE. = 168.?7' -3 - GUY ANCHCR
+ , . 17.23� I.E. 18" CONC OUT N. = 168.14'
1
� ,. . .. . . . � - MAiI �QX.
O RIM ELEV. = 164.31' � - M�AiER METER
I.E. 18" CONC :N S. = 158.86' � - TRAFFiC SIGNA�
1 LE. 12° CONC IN E. = 158.96' �
� LE. 24" CONC OUT N. = 158.�2' • - BOLl.4RD
� o
7
� - CABLE T`� RISER
` O RIM E�EV. = 161.04' � - TRAFFIC StGNAL 6C�
.. 1 1
4� I.E. 24" CONC IN S. = 156.94'
TELEPIiONE RISER
i I.E. 12" CONC IN NW. = 157.03' � �
N � I.F. 24" CONC OUT N. = 156.89' D.�, - CUC"LE IRON Pi?�
a' GTE MANHOLF O . �
< �'° SCALE: _
, � � 1��--30� O GRATE f_LEV. = 174.3^0'
� I.E. 18" CONC W 5. = 17D.61' �
�� I.E. 72" CONC IN W. = 171.E�' ' �
�: \ `" I.E. 18" CONC OUT P� - �'!i`�6'
° \1
a O7 GRATE ELEV. = 171.91'
�, '
�.E. 16" CONC IN S. r tE9 C''
n � I.E. 78" CONC OUT NW. _ ?68$1'
�
ii
SURVEY PREPARED yY:
�'' �1 EXfSTINCs SfTE BURVEY ��GRATE ELEv. = t53.68' G & L LAND SURVEYING, il`1^,
� � i„ �, LE. 12" CONC OUT NW. = 167.23' 8116 S.W. NIMBUS AVE.
`� BEAVEP.TON, OREGOPJ 9700�
°� O9 GRATE ELEv. = t58.68' JOB NE:7 41-C3u8 � i o
�' �1
I.E. 24" CONC M SW. = 153J8'
�= i.F. 2a" CONC OUT NE. = 15JOE' Z °
.iL -°a � �
r i
�nwC.. V.��665R'rE�BL?t:r'J':.' i,:l( 4PR iL. :. ' „ aa _-.. _. t
FI I�/F�O!C�ASI� _'_ ___
I
���ieoqo
- �
` . �' . .�, ' - o� . .Q�•. -- ---�-_ - - �
- :
- n ,- , =`r.�,.
� �
G �a O -� - , • `l:
. O � ' i
r • O , � � , ; ' O /i
� i�' ��� �I �3i,�pp I --— � - —
TYt �
I
�
�pt � O r�^ — — — . . ,. "
. � 0. �—I �, . ' , . O
, O • ' � p ^�` Bl
. ` . _ I-.. ...''�__ _ , '_
. : _ _.. : fi __�, , - � ,_� : : . ;
. _ , .
. --� �, , .
� , � i O 6 --
� � � �tr
_ � �--rt :
. , � :�;
..�� , a--� ��
� � :
� ; : -�- - - ' ' �a�v�A w N - �-
a N � i � m
� 10� I Dm�;�pr�Z�FtIX m
`� � �j I � � ��mN=A�Ap�, Z
.Y _ . � 7_Z= 7C m�-
a � I � � N��m�G�CZ1Dm� Q
(� � � � DpO�m ���c�7
v I �g <�,��A AI DIA
� _ • • � ----a +----+ �n mmp�= r� �(1
pE m= D �c
— ;� . r m � ��
�•�S � �,
� � �o� e
�- �p „� � � . _
aD� �.
N ,� �. � ��AWN=O��
. �-
� m3E��m��Z
, m$ENONDmA
ZDN �ADL�
N�� �g�D
AC7�(mA
zzm T O
D
m n
X �
Z �
N
� ,
Job No. �es
°°t°��-71-°� — THE RITE CENTER
Rev: AgQ{�.�
Sheet No. A3 of.� Interfaith Outreach Services
TIGARD, OREGON
M MY Par b.�a�,ti�,e.:1D7
F4rtLod,nH 97209
5082M.6`i90
� I, .
�
�
. ��S
• ���
� � � � II�
�/ �XI6T. 24°D.1. W,�7�
Ea�sr. 24" sr.b. �qn. Ib" R i.w�rp�
C%1� IZ" D.1. W/QER.
I r J ' I ovr�er r,ortruo�
oRir�ca vtwx,�u�
_ � � J x�sr. �.vs s.Envr�-ro r�i�
I
. EXKT. 21"ST,D, �� _
roT.ORA�N \
1 l I WRfLP.4WLIT'( �'x `'��`__
EXIST. S.S. � �\ PoNO r {¢a ��`+S. �SE
+ �, �l 11 gJ114'f. °..W.S¢.WER N
� l � ` �� �NO G�'S fPAV��6 �
NEW 57.b. (ONFIEGTIDI�1 �1 .�
� � I � � V �1� TD Y�Eri�ill, �
I � � �
NeW s.s. couu�c.�ra�l I �— NeW FNbN WAY[D- �
—�•� (� coAhaoV Mti1Het.e ��
[ � `_ 1�
I ' l PROPERrr LINE L,�i,J V
� _ ~ �
' !��/ � ` � -- _� Wt ,�, Z
I v t� N �, _ N e W sT.o_ - - - - - - - `./ �
� � New c.e. V
—t --� W � u.�
CXiyT c.g. I 1 I E � � � � �C Q
1 � New zr.o. � _ r � —
I I I � t-' - - –+ � I �[
I � � � � �.�r� �
� 'I 116a1 waTr.e►ltrca 1 r+ L GC
kN0 Ca1N[unoa I � � �1 \ uJ Q� Q
I I) ' �./
I � � � � � F- c �-
� I �I o-_� �d o � _ � I
I � I 1 NBW G.b. I I _I —. _ � ,�J .._
I '
I � I � ezu�. bws acxvk.c L � I
. - � � � - - - - - -� ,
I " ► � t � _ _
r-� � - - - -
I I�_ I XI4T. YELE.RML}R p �,.D. � Q
i I O
a I � � � I
I � ► �
p �z�ZT. GA5 ---} ' � I v—
J I
a i I I I Q
E I , � , , I =
�
I I N
P E1IISf.S.S.� . . � .
E1(iST. YL'b.l. WaTEn.: �.a�inN vnu.eY w�Ten. OKT.
exi�r. �e"zT.o.
�CONG�PTUAL U7ILITIES PLAN
¢W 0 H' I6' 31. N�� I
i
c i I �
u '
o �
z I
¢
s�
=�
��
�
s� i
w �
z IL �
Z „
� O K
�
_ �
���
���
� LANDSGAPE LECxEND �
� S7M80_ GOMI"10N NAME SIZE/GOND. SPAGING �
T�ES BOTANIGAL NAME
KT KATSURA TREE 2" GAL. A5 SHOUIN
GERCID�PH7LLUM JAPONIGUM
RSP REDSPIRE PEAR 2" GAL. 25' O.C.
PYRUSCALLERYANA
-•.�.��. ', SEEDED/SOD LAWN
�`j~ -
� - . ' � ... .. . �� Cif2AaJ$6ERI"I
� / �. � � '
'i . 1 ' .
.. '� i. � . t/'!
'b E�I�fiNb� � V
T��W W �1N �`�. .
k , . ,1 . �! _ ,I •Q�
8 / �- � I w —c
._,,. . . . .. _�r��ce Z �
��,a,` ` L1.� -'��—+ Z
� pl�+��ouN�- • . . U �
.� • ".a� �u+�py ., — — — — � . W � uU.,
� �.. � — — � —� - �"� .� O
� i wr
r — I —
�;.- � , --� � � I �. - � �� �
�, . ; � - -
,. .. � r+ . . : � �'AJ G� Q
✓v�uA� G�wt� �:� - - -\} �I. . -: :. . _ � I -.� -. I— c �-
, �.. . �- _ i i
;. , i :'�
•�.tl. a �- — —�— — ^ --t • : � I �"t
�� �� .� . . j - i -
i-d� �,��+ � � i
� .
n.�a-M � �'�`' �. — — — — — —I� : .
� I��' � `< � � �--— — . I �
�� � 5' hidr�t ,%��Ge o
i. —
� i
.
� ,
_ �; �
a r�m
, o
�. ,C�.�,C Z
� �
LANDSGAPE PLAN
N
_' m e is a� NORTN
a V V
�
Y !
7
�I�
r� �
�� � -
� � T
Z\ _ <
as � 7 � �
�.
1 �
� M`u65R[T�`,dLAnK.^Wu �AiF'� AP4 Iq 1997 TI�YE� 2�44 ?M _,��pl E <2
Ftl�/Pfot dat� ---/---
�- - - -- - -- - - - --i
I
T _ _ _ �
I '
� O �
� ,
1-- - - - - - _ �- - - - , �
I -I- _Il�' . ' � -
� o � -
�� �� �
� � �� -- 1- -
- �
� �� ��� o � i i
, � � �
�� �� � 0 I �
I � � O '
� , ,�
, � �
� _� �
, �
. , � � , �
� � � �, � i
s - - ' � _� ! _
� � o = � o =�-�
, ,_
i
ON 1 \�'= ' I
O O O � I ,
#—— — — � � O I
I � � �--.
� 9 I
� r I i o
� 0 0 � =O��J��AWN— r—
� a .� �- - -- -� r, , �1 � � �
O I �u U cl h� (1 cl 3 m'�
� �i==D�nzA
� ' � zp(izc�nr=r=Z(1�0 m
V � I � i i � �mmG��l�����-r z
\ � T I � � ��Za�mmA� p �
� e � I L � � Z�< N� �
z o 0 o I '� N �` o 0
� I �--� �---i I Z A $ ��� L
a � i I�� ' � O ; I � m 3 ZZm
I _ � ; � -�-�
� � � ' I (�C1
Z � �+- - — - - - - - - — m}m
�y� I ' A
L
� O �
.- I'I�D�� - - _���6�� NelDO1-�SIP�''1NN
i r-- - - ---
i �
I r---+ DDD�Z��mDN
� m��ZNNUz���
�-- --- -- -� ^'A rQ� AA m
�� m�� 0 m
3 L
� �m Z
X r= 1 (�
D mT D
O �3
Job No. s�bs
�°�.`�`-"-9, --- THE RITE CENTER �� �, .
�,�t No. A s of 4B Interfaith Outreach Services
TIGARD, OREGON
3�NW�.,�+,1...,�..•���wP:ari .
l4ded,OH 77809
SC6226.0690
► �
�AY.E;W�665RITE\BLANK.�VG OAiC 4Pk :D, 199? T[NE� 2�.q4 ?M�TSLALE� bq
Ffl�/P10t ds1! __"i"_
- -- � -- — � — — — - - — -- --�
� I
I v O I
� `J
�
� � � '
' _��
^ � — I
O ��
� Q;
I � � I
_
I � � � � � - - —
� � ��� O i
�
� s
�—��� / � � � �. � � � I
I � �'
' � ii
� � �
i - I�
� �
i � � � � ' �' �l � � (
� � - �
� —- - -� -� — —+- �,
I_ _ ; ,
,-� � o � O =�=�.__�
' � c
ir - � I
� „
� --- �:
�
, o , ._ . �
� o00 ,
I � �
' ' c� �
i I � , _
; a °� �
, � � o 0
� � ° ° (—` �� � _
�� �
� V W N—0 LD CP J G�11�A W N— '—
s � o rn
� r � f � �' p�.y �� r- ;-- I =��(1 7C r�i i D�z A ++'
44 � D DO=i<
� N /V I ' � V I �� �� i I r���L�_���zmA� m
i \ I ti_ -�—� Z
� �1 � -- O � O I I �A�za oOA� o �
� � i � I � � ����N� �
I m
Z I I -.__ � I D m A 00� L
� I i � �� � ' O � I � I Z A 3 ��m
; 1 � � � �
a ; _ __� D ��
N ' � � r �
� , ' m
� � � ' � I � O I I � �m
�� � i i � I �� � �--� I I�Z 'U
_ � j � � ftj
�1 I
+ I � `_ __ � tPAW NNetDfAJSNA
� I -i—� �____� _
A3�N �� 3G�r"L
� 1 � � �O I � cm�nzD�,i�jODD�zcmi+zD
- ! — ' Omn—��A�zp=�A=
�-- — — — - - -�- OA���O =E�jA
� �N m0 ��O �
I AD � �� 3
-+O -i�
� ��.�'I ----------- ��� m� O m
r
� m0
OO
� 3
Jo6 NO. 9665
R�.°�°�"�" THE RITE CENTER ,�,�
Sheet No. A7 of� Interfaith Outreach Services
TIGARD, OREGON
�.��.,�,��
���
��.�
t r
NAYE��k\665RI7E\BLAkK,UVG DnrE-aPk I0, ;997 i1ME-2��� PM i.iSC4LE� �9
Ff�R/PIOt CIAt! __' ' '_
�
—–+ � 0_ S
\ __�-- — — -� lo o d_
� I � '
o �� � o � a � -
� i N � � � .
m - ,
w � I a m
O \ z b � I IIi I I
O � !
m � � ' � �:I
r e
� o / z i --
� � � � !i� -_.-
m � ,'
< I i
� iil A ,��� � ,I �i�
� ° , ; il =
4 ; '^.�' � � -' _
Ii
,, � i, = C, �-.`�.� ---- �'
i � _ I" ��
_ � !� _._ , `
— ,i =__- — --- +
,
- >� - _ ��
I '
�I __ I a
I --- -- --- I
�I I �--- i i'i -- _ .___
� � i�i;,-- �
..�,__ i '1=- = C} �I �
i �il� _ i � - - I
; ,, _
r��� � ,� _ �
��. _ r
, I
� ,
�ry}� � � � �� r � ��� � I_� � �
�. ;
k � �I '
' i ` � I
��� � I ��� I
- I � � ~` --� �
--- -+ I-1--- -� +------�
-� : -
�
�
� ' - =-
- �;��
� ;���\
�� �"!I w��
� � ��'f� �--'
i � -- _ , i ---� O �
i
� � I � I
i I I � I
I i l � i � . I
, i m
�----� � � m '
�.__.�. D I
-� i
o �_ �
,�
� �
�„
; ;�
i�
�,N=�mO�-�O�trt�-wN– r–
rn!1
r�nm�D�Dgo�i��Z �+,
�nDOr���3N�G�1 Z
r�r�N �m� �
A�p��E��NN�AG� �
ozoDid����AgN
� ANN� D�cnpm
� cn rn=�=mp -
Z—rn z
A ��� m i
m� i
�`"N I I
0
z
�Ob NO. 9665
°°`°:`�"�91 - -- -- -- THE RITE CENTER
Rev:
AItCdII7'F:('I� '�,
Sheet No. A 8 0, .� Interfaith Outreach Services
TIGARD, OREGON
����.��
�.�R�
�.��
I ;
c
•
Exh i bit B
RITE Center Programs
' .r..■ �€€€ib •ee �s:ea P.e6
4
IN'�'ERF.AI'I'I3 OUTREAC�-I SERVICES
. Program Descri�tion
Interfaith Outzeach Services provides comprehensive,profcssional,fanuly based services
that address the muhiple issues homeless persons face as they work towards
independeace. IOS is committed to the four principles of Responsbility, Accountability,
Partnership and Caurage in its approach to resolving homelessness. Responsibility for
actions, Accountabiliry to funders,Partnexship with the commt�nrty and Cousage to
ehange systems that sim�ly appease the poverty siricken to systems that eradicate it.
7hrough innovative�rogramming Interfaith Outreach Services moves v�+ith homeless
persons from the hopelessness of poverty to the power of i�ndependence.
SELF-SCTFFICIEIVCY p�tUGRAM
The Self-Suffici�ncy Progx'am�s designed to break the cycle of homelessness and paverty
by addressmg each program participant's s�ecific individual issues that dircctly a.ffect the
fami]ies stability. The program uses a P�iASED approach designed to assess participant
rcadiness,needs,goa�s and develop a long-term paRnership leading from crisis to stability
and indeper►dence.
PHAS�l(first w�eek)
Participants enter program through process of outreach,intake and assessment-
�h; Through a coordinated effort between I.aw finforcem,en�Citizen involvemrnt
Teams,Local Governanent,Business�wners,Parks and Recreation Personnel,Public
Works Personz�el and Interfaith Outreach Scrvices,homeless persons are identified. An
outreach worker v�isits camps and other areas where homeless persons are living,including
thc Seyvere Weather Shelter�to begin an et�gagement process to determine initial
emergency needs. As a trust relationship is developed,the worker conducts a needs
assessment and makes appropriate referrals, including particapadon in the Self-Sufficicncy
Program.
IutH,k�: The Self Su�ciency Coordinator interviews applicants and assesses cut�'ent needs
and fitness�or Project Self-Sufiiciency.
• Sdf-Su�ciency Coordinator and participants develop a on�e-week
action pla�r�focusing on stabilizu►g individuals. T'his plan may include:
-Appoitrt�neut with Adult and Family Services to apply for entitlements.
-Obtaiaing needed identification.
-Workzng in a Day Labor pmgram.
� � €€€€16 '90 35:94
P.97
t
' Interfsith Outreach Services
progam Description
. Page 2
-Enrollir�children in school and in IOS'Child Uevelopmer:t Program.
-Addressing he�alth needs at IOS'Health Clinic.
-Acquiring needed cfothing, shoes, school suppfies,etc.,through IOS'Emergency
Services progam
gt„Zhe completio�,of Pha.�:
-Each client wi11 meet with the Program Covxdinator to complete an "Evaluation
and Recommendation" fornz,which vvill be reviewed at subsequem weekly case
meetings.
-Participants move in one of three directions.
}� ; i Per�ed' Participa�rts with domestic viotence probiems or problems of severe
alcohol and drug abuse wiil apply for an appropriate program while transferred to the
Severe Weather Stzelter until they can etrtet the appropriate special needs progrun.
Leave the�h�lter: Pxrticipants who are inappropriate for the program(due to brea�ng
the rules,etc.), or who have not self-identified spec'�f'ic issues t►ir►dering their progess will
leave the progam.
phas�..II(all other cGents)
During the 3-6 weeks of Phase 11:
-Participants and the Qrogram Coordinator develop an"Action Qlan" consisting of
the goals and objectives to be wvrked on for the remainder of their progam,
_partieipatrts will meet daily with the Prograzn Cvordinator to solve problems,
receive support and advocacy and track progress.
phase Il action glans may includc;
-Meeting with pr�employmemt counselor to complete a resume and practice
intervicw and job search ski}ls.
-Attendance at NA/AA,and/or other recovery prograff►s.
-A�tendance at play therapy appointmeats for children at the Child Development
Cectter.
-Attend Pre-employmcnt workshop.
-VV'ork on credit issues.
-Participate in the?ogether in Literacy,Family Literacy Program_
-A,tt�nd PLUS Workshop Series
.
€�€�16 '00 15:05 P.08
l
� Interfaith OutreACh Servwc�s
Program Description
Page 3
-Application for subsidi2ed housing,tzansitional housing and/or permanent
housimg.
-Job search.
-Starting a savings account and leanrti�ng s�s in maintaining a bank account.
-Work an parenting, mental health, and other personal issues.
-Attendance at�Iousing Location Workshops to learn skilLs in locating housing
and in LandlordrTct�ant rights.
At the completion of Phase�, clients will move urto Phase�II.
p��(9 months to 2 years)wiU increase the suecess of participants in maintaining
stabilized hat�siYtg and decre�ase the likclihood of continued episodes of homelessness.
phase III will includt one of the following as appropriate:
• For up to one year as participazrts
stabilize into permanent housing.
�,��F�x1 Gase.M�nag r�r ent: Participants will be referred to Washington County
Community Actions'2 year case management program.
T ncitional ��cin�: Pazticipants will move i,t�to transitio�al housing with continued
support services.
,S�lShS1L17P.(1 HOL$LQ Participautts reeei�ving a Section 8 certificate wiit move into
subsidized housing vv�ith continued support services.
• paRicipants with on-$oing needs will be reFerred to another program,
such as assisted Iiving.
• phase IFI wt�l also itt�clude the£ollowing, as needed:
-Limited Emrrgency Services.
-Comtirniod participation in the Child Aevelopmtnt Program.
.p$sistance�n �cquiring fixrniture, bedding,kitchen items, etc.
-Crisis interverition.
-Information and referral.
� €€€€16 '06 15:85 P.09
•
Interfaith Outreach Services
� Program Descrip#ion
Page 4
-Cont,�nued stabilization support.
CHYL,D DEV��.OPMENT CENTER
Childrett comprise the fastest growing homeless population today. Their lives are
dominated by a seemingly insurmowrtable poverty that is characterized by domestic
violence, child abuse, substance abuse, foster care, chronic health problems. It is
inadequate educatio�however,wh;ch cripp�es a fazr�ity's ability to survive. Education can
providC a viable eaat frvm poverty.
The Chi'ld Uevelopment Cemer serves both infant and pre-school children. It incorporates
a child centered cuniculum that nurtures homeless children's cognitive, social and physical
growth and buitds a strong foundation for future leaming.
PR,E-EMPLOYIV�NT WORKS�OPS
Participants will attend a pre�-employmem,week tong workshop before beginning their
employrneni search. The workshop helps participauts become job ready by addressing
such isseies as researching and choesing a career,assessing skills,experiences and work-
reiated preferences,writing resumes and cover letters,irterviewing and meeting on-the-
job perfo�tnance standards. The workshop gives participatrts the opportunity to be self
reflective and to thinlc about their skills and iirterests,as well as issues such as child care
t�ceds, wor�C and educadonal experiences which may influence their employment opdons.
THE TOGET�ER IN LEARNING(TIL)FAMII.Y LITERACY PRUGRAM
This program uses a learner-directed curricuh�m to teach hameless persons the literacy
sldlls they need to g�n employmerrt and independence. Parez�ts and children participate
together in activities designed to promote learning as a family. ?he goal of the program is
to reduce the lottg-term educational risks facing homeless families by developing the
literacy skill of parents and promotiu�g learning as a shared family value.
PRACTIC,A�.L�VING/USE�'UL SKIZLS WORKSHOP
This series enhances the indepen,dem living s1d1ls of homelcss peirsons by giving them the
l�owledge,skills and confidence nceded to break the cycle ofdependence and maintain
permanerrt housing. Cutricula consists of the following six workshaps each with 6
scssions:
-Parenting
-Stress Management
-Women, Sex,HN/AIDS
-Family Violence
c�i.�r,:�.-'��`f�1.-T�..
t
€�€t16 '80 15:86 P. 79
�t
Interfaith Oatreach Services
� Progcam Description
Page 5
-Unlock the Door to Housing
-�am�ily Health
.R,ESIDEhIT7AL CENTER
The I4S Residential Ce�cter is currently located in the Tigard United Methodist Church.
A new building is scheduled for completion in July, I997. The Center houses hameless
families and inctividuals who are enrolled in the IOS Self-Sufficiency Program. The
program is designed to addresx the multiple and varied causes of homelessness. The
program extends to families for up to one year after moving to pe�xnanent housing.
The center is staffed by valuriteer ovemight hosts and meal providers. It has a capacaty of
14. During the course of a year we will house, on the average, over 250 individuais.
HEALT"H CARE
Health 5ervices are provided on site at the IOS Health Clinic. Services include conrzplete
medical examinarions,follow-up care, prescript#o�s,pxeve�t�ve care,e�ucation ax�d
referrals.
EMERGENCY SERVICES
IOS offers a variety of emrrgency services. These services include: crisis intervention,
information and referral,transportation, laundry and clothing vouchers, and food boxes.
Prevention services and rent assistar�ce are provided in partnership with other a$encies.
LOOF�G TOWARD THE FUTURE
Residential Independence Training and Education(ItITE)Ce�tter
C�nrently IOS is�unctioning using scattered sites ill-equippcd for residential, prog�am and
storage use. This causes time, orga.nazatio�al and cost efficiency problems.
IOS will be losing its existing residential space, currently located at the Tigard United
Methodist Church,ia the summer of T 997. This problem also presents an opportunity.
IOS 'ss pureh�sing property for the constsuction of a ncw;facility,the Residential
Independence 7raining and Educatioa(R.ITE)Cemer. This trecttendous oppo�tuniry will
allow us to wnsolidate and expand 'un the foilowing ways:
-All current programs azad Administrative Offic�s will�'unction from one site.
-The resxde�ial capacity wiU double.
-The RITE Cemer w'sll be the first handicapped accessible residential program�or
homeless persons in the cou�ty.
:rl:'L�".}�.,�S T:C:� .• �
'l.'.�""A""".�'b' .�,
1 �St�16 '00 15:07
P. 11
�
I�t�r!'aith Oatresth Services .
Program Description
, Page 6
Most importstntly however witi be the ablity ta provide additionul services to fill
� commuuity resonirce gaps that are currently keeping many people trapped in
poverty.
On-sitc comprehertsive family based services wilI be pro�ided at the RITE Center to equip
homeless families and singles vv�th the education attd tools they neec�to break the cycle of
depet�dency and begin a t�ew cycle of stabi�ity and independent living. These incIude:
_He�1th Services
-7Lt;np Start Child Development Centex'
-Accelerated ARer-Sc�ool Program
-The Faztuly Reunificatioz�Program
-Tagetlaer in Lcarning Family Literacy Program
-Fre-employment fzaining Workshop
-Emplo�►ment/T'raining Program
_pxactical Living/Useful Skills Workshop Series
-Aftercare Support Services in Permane�nt Housing
�n addition IOS will continue its present services ine�uding our suceessfiil Self-Sufficiency
Program.
. �
.
. ►
.
722 S.W. Second Avenue, Suite 400
Portland, Oregon 97204
AFR-24-1'�97 16��5 WASH.C:0.COhif�1.L�VLPh1T. 1 5�.� r 81 2882 F.02
A��NDA
WASHINGTOIti" COCJ�tiZ'�' �OA�ItD ()N� �OMNTI�SI()���K�
Agcnda Category- �cansent - Ofrice of Coms„unity Dcvclo�ment ___ . .
Agenda Title INTERFAITH OUTREACF-i SER 'ICES: ASSI�NMCNT OF O.P`X'1OJ*I A.i�l]
AUTH�?RIZATIOI�OF?;XECUTIQ?�'ClF PROJECT AGRL�:���IT' _
To be presented by Henrv 7. Marct� Program Mana�er �_"......._,._...,,
SUMIlZARY (Atta�ch Suppnrting Documents if Necessary};
4n February 11, 1997, by N�ir►ute Order#97-43, your Rov�d authoriz�d the County Administrator or
his designes to execute an �ption Agreement for the purchase of 7'ax Lots 1 S 1 3 5 CA 02500 and
026(}0, on Crre�nburg�t.oad, in'I"igard; and to, subsequently, acqtaire th�property. This property is to
be used far the construction of a�iomeiess Facility, that will be operated by Ynterfaith Outreach
Services. The option was exereised on February 2a, 1997.
This project is funded by the federal government. The most efficient way to comply with federal
requirements is to enter into a project agreement with Interfaith Outreach Services, and assign the
option agreement to that Agency prior to closing. This allovvs the A�ency the cpportuniry to begin
work on the property immediately ai�er closin�, and avoids the County assuming responsibility and
liability for the property for the short period of time until conveyance o�'the property to thc Agcncy.
No County C�neral funds are in�volvcd.
Copies of the Project and A.ssignment Agreements are availabie at the Clerk'� desk.
DEPARTMENTS R�QC7�S7ED ACTION:
At your May 6, 1997 meeting, yaur Board authorize the County Administrator or his des':gnee tQ
execute the Project Agreement and the Assignment of the Op;ion Agreernent to Intcrfaith
Qutreach Services.
C(�U1vTY A►DMINISTRATOR'S RECOMMENDATT�N:
gei�da Item No,
Date:
j:con tra ctli o sagn.d oc
HP��-?4-1997 16�35 LJASH.CQ.C011��1.D�.!LP��1T. 1 5�' b�i 2882 °.�i�
�
W
�
AGENDA
WASHIl�iGTON COUNTY BOARD OF COMMIS5YONERS
Agenda Category _ Consent Office f om uni Develo ment
Agenda Title ALTfHORIZA O R ISE OPTION ND SUBSB NTLY PURCHASE REAL
PROPERTY.POTENTIAL SiTE FOR HOMELES5 SrTELTER
�o be presented by H.3. March r a an er
$ZT11?MARY (Attach Supportiag Datuments if NeceSSary)
Some months ag�, your Boat'd directed staff to proceed with an initiative to deveiop a project, in concert
with Intarfaith Outreach Services(IOS), to acquire groperty and construct a Homeless Fa�ility in Tigard.
As noted in the attached, in October 1996, thc Caunty entered into an"Option to Purchase" for a site the
Agency estimated to be ideally suited. Shortly thereafter, staff began a broad range of activities to clear
the site to meet all federal real property acquisition requirements.
The TOS pro}ect would expand the number of bed spaces thery currently have for the homoless, from 14 to
an estimated 25 to 30 spaces {depending on available resources}, and provide the additional space
nccessary to cortduet rehabilitative activities designed to return the homeless to self-sufFicienCy. The need
for such a project was triggeted by the fact that IOS will need to move from their current locatian in the
very near future.
(Summary continued on Page 2)
DEPARTMENT'S REQUESTED ACTION:
At your Febrvary I 1, 1997 meeting, your Board authorize the�ounty Administrator or his designee to:
execute thP Option Agreement to Purchase Tax Lots 1S1 35 CA 42500 & 026�0 for no more than the
appraised fa.ir market value; establisF� a closing date; notify tenants to relocate; and, subsequentiy acquire
the property.
C�UNTY ADMINISTRATOR'S RECOMMENDATION
I concur with the department`5 requested action.
r'.t'!•H:�Vi:.L: Y:.C._+=i:..�:�C1N C;Ci.._.1 i
BCAi{D OF' COM::ISSIONERS .
c y 7_ � Agenda Item No.�,
,Y,INU;.. OiiD�xl A .......................��...............
UA'i'E ..... ......... ... '�.��.�.7 ..... Date �� �/
$Y �.0..rb a!4 g .�m.a�
CC' ROW ct.�fuc ar'T' soAw
ros n,��n��.
APR-24-1997 16�36 WASH.CO.C�t�1M.DVLPr1T. 1 503 681 2882 P.a4
Fage 2
Homeless Shelter Site
BQC Agenda
SLTMIv�ARY (continued)
In order to receive any portian of the Block Grant set aside of�SQ0,000 for such a project, Interfaith
Outresch Services (IOS) agreed to make a $250,000 match by no later than February 3, 1997. As of this
writing, it appears the Agency has met that commitment. Fina1 confiRnntio�will be avail�ble at
worksessio� on February 11, 1997. As nated sarlier, the Palicy Advisory Board recommended that
regardless of A,gency's performance, as related to the match requiremerrt, ttte designated site should be
acquired and if necessary, held for future CDB�'J uses.
The site for the IOS project is located off Greenburg Road, south of H'ighway 217, and consists ok two
contiguous tax lots tota�ling 0.72 acces which are zoned R-12. An apprnisal of the parcel established its fair
market value at $200,000.
The�e are two sesidential structures on the property. The iargest unit contains five bedrooms. With
extensive rehabilitarion the farmhouse style residence can be restored and used by the Agency as office
spact or as a day care facility. The la�ger unit was occupied at the outset of negotiations, and therefore the
occugants are clearly eligible for relocation assistance und�r the federal Unifonn Relocation Act (URA).
T'he smaller, 600 square foot unit on the property was unoccupied initially, and considered non-habitable.
17ue to an appar�nt oversight on the part of the County's consu(tant, the property owtter, unaware ofURA
requircments, rented the smaller unit in early December, 1996. The coosequence of such action mearis the
short term tenants may also be eligible for relocation assistance, As noted by staff, the patential costs of
relocation can be mitigated. IOS understands that the costs of acquisition and relocation wiit be subtractui
from the $500,040 CDBG set-asidE with the balance rr�ade available for construction activities.
At this time, sufficient funds should be available to support the construction of a 5,000 squaze foot facility.
Any additionat resourcts broeaght to the table by I�S will increase the amount of square footage; ar can be
used to rehabilitate the larger residential urut on �he property.
Copies of the Option to Purchase; Appraisal; Phase I Environmental; and, the Environmental Review
Checkiist are available for public review at the Office of Community Development.
1�'o County General Funds are involved.
Attachment: Uptian Agrcement
j:acqnopn.doc
nd"l��/#1�
aPR-�a-i9'?7 16:37 �,�H'=;H.CO3 i-0111°t,I��.�LF'f iT. 1 5L3 b81 288� F.�5
� STATE OF OREGON 1 SS
County of Washington �
�, Jerry ^��t�'�A� of Assess-
ment an `�b io County
Glerk to rtiTy that
the wit i r" � ceived
and re ��;� , � d� of sald
}�� coun . �k� (� �� - :+ '*
. After Recon;ing Rcttun To: ��
�-� �
's" � 'Y CZ
Office of Caa��ty Davelopa�en� `�'yi,y ��.; .- b�`c,
Mailstop //7 � �rector ol
g � sxation,Ex-
� lerk
� Doc : 96092742 . � $3 . 00
� Inv : 6481
C� 10/16/1996 10: 36: 24am
U
OF'TIQN AGREElVIENT
AND
AGRELMENT T4 PURCHASE AND SELL REAL PROFERTY
RECITAI.S:
Whereas, Washington Covnty, by and through its Qffic� af Community Developmeat, desires
to purohase the property descnbed in Exhibit A, in a voluntary, arms length t�rransaction with
Seller, and
VV�RF�+►S Washington County is a gavernment agency and has thc paurer of eminent domain
but has detennined that it will not use its powcr of emi.nent domain if negotiations fail to result
in an amicabla agrc�mcnt;
1. QPT14N: In consideration of the sum af �3,000, ("Option Payment") and other
valuable con�ideratian, the receipt and sufficiency of which are acknowledged, say M. Kirlanan
("Seller"), for the Seller and the Seller's administrators, successors �nd assignees, offer and
agree to sell and convey to VYashington County ("Buyer") and grant to Buyer the exclusive and
irrevocable option and right to purchase ("(Jption"), under the conditions provided in this
Option, the fallowing-d�scribed property ("Property"), Iocated ia Washington County, State of
Oregon:
See Attacherj legal description, Exhibit A
Also referred ta as Tax Lots 1S1 35 CA 0250Q & 026Q0
2. PURCHASE PRICE A1�'b CLOSIl�TG: The total purchase price for the property shall
be the amount cstablished pursuarlt to an appraisal completed by the R.ight-of-Way Associates,
Inc. or another certifie� Real Estate Appraiser approved by Seller a.°�d Buy�r, ("Purchase
Pricc"), subject ta the conditions set forth in paragraph b. The cost of such appraisal shall be
paici for solely by Buyer. Closing shall occur within ninety days after the Notice 5gecified in
Paragraph 6 is delivered to Seller. Buyer shall be entitled to exc�usivc possession of the
Property on and after the Closing D�te. Time is of the essence of this Agreement.
PAGE 1 - OPTION AGREEMENT
I ,j�R ryry�
.___ ����./,�V
APR-24-19'?7 16�38 WA�H.C0.COP�1ht.D��!LPf'1T. 1 ��3 681 2882 P.�b
3, LENGTS OF UP'I'ION: 'Th� �Ption shall remain irr�vacable for a period vf three
months and any extensions from the date of tt�is (�ption. if necessary for Buyer to camplet�e its
federal real property acquisitian activities, Scller grants t+o Buyer two one month extensions of
this qption Agreement be�ond the initial three month C?Ption Pexiod. To so extend this Option,
Buyer will nodfy Seller in writing and pay an additional $1,Q00 per mont�, �rior to the
axpiratian of th� applicable option period.
q, �LEE A.ND CLEAR TTTL�: At Clasing, the Property shall be conveyed to Buyer
subjeut ta any excepk�on5 to title applicable to the Property (as reflect,�d by a commitment f�r
title insurance obtaine,d by Buyer from a title insurance company approved by Buyer and Seller
prior to the closi.ng), except Iiens For indebtedness of Seller which eneum�ber the Properiy, wluch
Seiler shall be obligated to remove at Clasing.
The Seller fiirther agre�s to convey said property to the Buy�r by statutory sgeci.al warranty deed
conveying to the Buyer a valid, unencumbered, indefeasible fee-simple title to the P��rtY•
Seller warrants and represents that there are no pend'nng or threatened condemnation, litigatian,
administrativ� ar similar proceedings affecting the properiy.
5. NC�TICE �tEQUIRF.� TO E7�F.RCISE OP'I'iON: Tlus(?ption may be exercised
by Buyer, at arty time while the C)p�ion remains in farce, by rnailing, telegraphing or deliv�ring
in persort a writie� notiPe of the �uyer's exercise of the Qpkion to the Seller.
6. CONTINGENC'i'': Seller may refuse e�cercise of the Option if the Purchase Price is
less than one hundred ninety thousand dallars{$190,000)by refundxn�the pro rated share of the
remainin� Qpd�n Payment attributable to the remaining term of the Qption after exercise of the
dptian. (Far exarnple, if the option is terminated under chis provision six weeks after execution,
then seller would retain one half of the option gayment and refund the balance ta the buyer).
7, gA��,RDp�TS SUBST'AI�CES: 5eller represents that Seller has no lrnowledge that
there are of have been an�+ h�zardous substances, �s defined in OTtS 465.2pQ(9}, in, on, buried
under, or used on the property.
g, REMEDIE.S: If BUyer fails to exercise the Option during the aption peribds for any
reasan, other. than the for breach af this agreement by Seller, ther► Seller's sole recourse is to
retain all l�ption Payments(s). If Buyer has exercised the Option and performed all of its
obligations hereunder and Seller fails or refuses to convey the Property to Buyer, then �uyer,
as its exclusive remedy, ma� either (i) terminate this Option and obtain the refund of all Qption
Money previously paid to Seller or {ii} ter►der perfarmance of the obligations of$uyer hereundcr
and specifically enforce the obligation of Seller to convey the Properiy to I3uyer. Buyer waives
the right to pursue any other remcdies hereunder.
9. PRORATTON OF TAXES, ASSFSSMEN'TS AND CLOSING COSTS: P r a o z
years' taxes and assessments including any interest due are the responsibility of the Seller.
Taxes, assessments ar►d other general and spe�ia� assessments of whatsoever nature far t he year
�A(�� 2 - OPTION AGREEMENT
,
� �����'��
APR-24-1 q`�7 16�38 WA�H.CO.COM��1.li!JLPP�IT. 1 5�3 6F 1 2882 P.07
in which the closing of the transaction takes place shall be prorated as of the date of the closing
of the transaction. If the closing of the transaction shaU occur before the t�c ratc is fixed, the
apportionment of taxes shall be on the basis of the tax rate for the next preceding year applied
to the Iatest assessed valuation. Seller and buyer shall each pay ano-half of the escrow fee of
the Title Company with resp�ct to closing.
10. R�,SY� O�' Y,OSS: Loss or damage to the property by fire cr from an act of God shall
be at the risk of the Seller until the deed to the Bu�►er has be�n recorded, and in the event that
such Ioss or damage occurs, the Buyer may, without liability, refuse to accept conveyance of
title, or may elect to aecept conveyance of title, in which case there sha11 nat be any equitable
adjustment of the purchase price.
11. CONSENT TO ENTER: The 5eller gives Buyer or its agents consent to enter
on said property at reasonable times for the purpose af conducting tcsts or studi�s that Buyer
deems necessary, in connection with the purchase af the Prop�xt�+. If this Qption is not
exerciscd, Buyer shall c�use the subject property to be left essentiall� in its original state.
$uyer shall indemnify and hold seller harmless from all claims, damages, causes of action and
other ezpenses of any nature which rr�ay be incurred by Seller ar ass��rUed against Se�ler or the
Property in connection with any entxy upon the properiy by Buyer or its agents.
12. TTTLE Il�ISURANCE: Seller shall deliver to Buyer at closing a Standard Owner's
�ovtraga Palicy of Title Insurance, in the face amaunt of the Purchase Price, insurin$ Buyer's
title, subject to the exceptions to title disclased by the title commitmant obtained by Seller,
except for liens secuzing indebtedness of Seller which shall bc rtmoved by SeUer at Closing.
I3. A�SIGNABILTTY: This Option Agreement shall bi,nd and inure w the benefit of the
administrator, successors and assignees of the respoctive partics. Buyer may assign to another
its interest in the Properiy upon written notificatio�� to Seller.
14. AT"TOIZNEY FEFS: If either party arbitrates or brings an action regarding this
Option, the prevailing party in such action shall be entitled to re�over its attarney fees and court
costs, at arbitrdtion, at trial and on appeal.
15. DAT� OF OPTION: The term "date of this 4ption" shall be the date by which
both Buyer a,nd Seller have signe� this Option Agre�ment.
X6. ACGEPTANCE OF ��'I'ION: Seller has 7 days frvm the date this Option is
delivered in which to consider this offer, after which said offcr shall become null and void.
17, NQTICES REQiJIltED BY T�iIS AGREEMFNT: Any notice required by this
agreement shall be in wri�, and shall be delivered in person or by rirst class ma.il, certified.
Undl further notice Seller's address is: _ � Tigard, Oregon 972�---1
Buyer's address is 1 , venu Suite 17p, Hillsbvro, Oregon 97124. � � _ ,���
�7��'9✓�?c;�� �-,,�',�1
FAGE 3 - OPTION AGREEMENT ��� ,,��,��,%�!J � ��� 7
.-,.��`' /
�,
APR—�4-19'?7 1�:39 W�SH.CL.COf�1f�1.I�l,��_PhiT. 1 5�.�3 681 2P8� P.03
. 18. The Progeriy shall be convey�d to Buyer 'AS IS, VV�t.B IS, WtT�i ALL FALTLTS.'
Seller has not made, nor shall Seller be de�med to hav� made any repze�ser�tati�ns or warranties
to Buyer regarding the quaiity or �ndiaon �f the Property, the pernutted uses of the Property,
the quality or conditioa� of thc soil situ�.ted in and on the Propeny, the presence or absence of
any hazardaus wastes or other cantaminants upon the Pmpert�r, �xcept for the representarion in
paragraph 7, or the fitness of the Frop�rty for any particular purpose.
THE PRQP�RTY DESCRIBED Il�J THIS INS'IRLTII�.NT MAY NOT BE WITHIN A FIItE
PRQTECTTON DISTRICT PROTECTIN� STR�J�TURFS. THE �R4PBRTY IS STJBTECT
TO LAN17 USE LAWS ATS� 1�GU'LA7'IONSy WHICH� IN FARM OR FORE.ST ZONFS�
MAY NOT ACTrfHORIZE CONSTRUCTION �R STITI�iG �F A RESIDENCB. BEFdRE
SIGNING C)R ACCEP'I'ING TF�IS INSTR.L]MENT, 'I'FiE PER,SON ACQUIRING FFE TTIT.E
'�'O 'I'FT� PROPLTtTY S�TOU�.D C�7ECK WITH TH� APPROPRIATE CITY OR C�UNTY
PLANI�IING DET'ARTMENT Tt7 VF.RT�'Y APPROVED [ISES A NCE QF FIRE
PROT�C'1"ION FQR STRUCTt3RFS.
DATED:_____�_ ^ ,� , 1996
� eller
DAZ'ED: `U � �7` '� _, 1996 �ZLU�V
Buyer
STATE OF QREG(3N )
)ss
County of Waslzingtan )
On this day of ���, lgg6, persana�ly appeared befvre me
_ �' ' , wha being duly sworn and acknowledget� the foregoing
' strument ta be his voluntary act and dced.
� � ��� � �
/ , ,
Natary Pu alie fQr Qregon
My commission expires �—��3 ��-v
,�.r....�,.,�,,.�___.�,.�,�,.��..Y_�,,.
rr�y
�`���� f?�r='t::lAl,a�,�+l
��y. ,;.�:�i Crz=c::!.{i C.!..°.,i:.1
�;.�vi hs;7^}RY F::±?LiC..r�;tEt;n��l
APPR�VEQ AS TQ F�RM �i �t.7�.,;F:s�;�,,,h�,;.,:,:;z�:,�
��!l�i iY!yika:,'riiil�X�II1�5 t��R,z" ?b„'�L'
'�r��s....�� y.:..Lr.�7AM'fT:iOS)."L...1._:..L:.VtT .
�(``- � _
�ASSISTANT C4U�7Y COUNSEL
FOR 1h'ASHINGTUN COv�:�Y, O�.E.
PAGE 4 - pPTiQ;v A�REEMENT
f=iPR-24-1997 16�40 WiHSH.C0.��.C''it1.L:�I�LF'(°iT. 1 5�3 't��l 2882 P.09
STATE OF OREGON )
)ss
County of Washingwn }
On this ��� day of oG��� , 1996, PersonallY �PI�� before me
ROber v ' _.._, who is ti�e Asst Coun�jr Administrator of
r • � � and who being duly sworn and acknowledged the foregoing
instrurn t to bt his volunt�ry act and dt.�d.
� - � �
Notary Public r Qregon
My commission expires �
l:r:'�'w�'`�'..�.�:�.�'�`".����v�.�
/�*�.�•. i�i�r'�.{1�... 'il.:;�
( .xy` '•i;� �:!' (( r
z �.•'••_"!:::r:�t..�.�,Y�,,i i::�
:� �."r� ..h r �t�� �in - �•-.• �
. �t _ '"'.•,� t�J<<. t-���.i..iC - 'vr �JI`;
,�}�_�,�'� _ G�C.;�i'.�115�;.^,N 1.1u, 0�E1 E31 r
r� ��ri�,:��":t.�r:j+t:7�:;c���.11 i����'p
�S``���`"`"��=�;a��.���:._. 'r'-�'r`�"�=�."I
PAGE 5 - �PTION AGREEMENT �`�
�
C �P 7�\'��-�
HPr='—?,1-1'�'?� 1 h:4GJ �JASH.CD.C0��1M.L�VLPf�1T. 1 5l73 681 �882 F. 1 L�l
I
• 'Che Lo1loNinq deseribed tract oC land in tt�e Souehvest quert4Y �f
Seotlon �S, Mownshl.p t 3outh, Ranqa 1 Nee! ol the Willamottrt
J MoYldian� 1n the County of Weehington artA Steto a� QYe9dn� to� i
v�,t t �I
� " ;�;�
�x dx�'� �aginning at en 7,roa pipa S.n ttia Greenhucq Couety aoad No. 179 on
the Maet 1lna e! tha Greanburg xrect �C the Northweet corngC et a
one ecea eracr, 497.45 Loot East and �i� leat NerCh of the
�ex 9cuthweet corner oi the Davld C. Graham Clain� Ne. 571 t?ltnca
� NnrtAsrly a�onq the t4e�t 21ne oE the c�veabvrg TKae� 70.35 �eee,
"�; ta en ira� p�go in ehe ceunty Reed� thence Noren e4•3o° Easc sa
� aoG to sn Sronf thencd South 5'O7' Eaet 58•1 Xeee, to 3n Sron o� {,;
y 'J' the North xino o! seid eqe ecta tract) thenc• +�Ionq eald line ���,
���w South 78• wast 105 la4t to the point e! begl�nninq. i'�'
�,��, �� ;�¢�,
��� ��,� � �� AND tho Lollouinq deseribed tra�t o� ]',^d in tho Souihvea r � . .
a n:� ,; y q u A S t a r o t 3 e c t i o n ]5, T ow nohl.p � 8outh, h. nqe 1 tteat oE the �x°
�� W11lemotto Ner�dian, in the Ceuney o! Washinycon an� Stske o! fi.��
"`,�, ��'�„� . ; �rsqon, ta-witc .
�,c;t�� °"p�',
�s�s+�',���,,� Hegintfiqq at an iton pipe in tha Crsonburg Coynty Road No. 17B on
��� �. �� !hd Woet lino of the Greenburg ixaet ak the Northaas� corner oe a
�`���^ �" one eeze traet 487.45 fcat Eaat and 230.73 feet NorCh oC the
���' �w � Svvtliweet eornat of the Oev1d C- �c.�h�A Clal.m No- 5Z, thvncc
�;`<fiy� �i z;: 1 .
�`,a �� tiorlh 83.27 feot to the Southueet corner o! 0.062i acre lraett
� ,;�: thenea alonq the South line a! same, Narth 78' East 223.02 fae�
����� +r ±' t `�" to an �ron piper thence Sonth 37'03' Ea;t 65•52 foat to an iron
F` ,�''u,"�� ;. �d pl.ps� thene� SouCh 73'17 1/Z' Wtst 258.98 fEet to ahe po1rtC af
F ���"' � btqinning.
i��� �� � ����,�� �
µ1nf , '�.�,�'��M; FUATHEA ExCEPTistG TxEREFRCM that pazcnl ae conveyed by wsrzsnty
� Deod recosded August ], 1990 aa Fea No. 90-�1696.
,�.;� , �� ;�+ {,.i
`oY �,�'�� Pl1RCEL tte
'� �; �> ,
� ' '�'� �E ° Beginninq at hn iron pin Srl County Rvad No. 2A43, (Greenburq
,t, , �'�r j Rcad) oaid point be�ng 4��•a5 leet gaat a�� 230.73 Leet t7orth oL
'' �N �he Sont:�wost cocner qt� t5Q �• C. Crahaa Dos�ation Lnr.d C�a�n No.
'" ,��e� '��� #i 53 fn 6eatlon 35. '�ovnship 1 Souti�+ Aenqe 1 weat ai ih4
i� , �`� � �""����� � Willam�rtte Meridian, �n ths Coun:Y ot liavhingtvn snd Staee of
'^��_��` r �;� �,��vF Oreqanr thanco rtorth 7�•17'�0• Ease 269•98 fect ta an iron pir+�
'�td� .,� ,�,� � 'r�'" a }' thence soueh }7•p]' East A0.23 tart to an iron pin in khe North `
line et Orepon E2ectzie R. tl. riq'�� o! wayi thancp squth 52•S7'
Hast 305.A3 feet aleng ehe North line Ot aaid Ortgon ELee!xie
� �r rfght of Yay to an izon pin in eenter of C�urtty Aosd� thenc9
" �A� ?� North 10•37' Wast SoB.7 feat elony c��ter oi yaSd Courlty Road io
,.� .��:
� z � i eA iren p!n in the anqle of aeid readi tfienca Nosth 77.5� teeC Go
:`. �°,,, th• place 4t beginninq.
///yyy...���,;: a��---------- .�. ._.
y4 � �, , � • . �.•��!'
1 � ' w�,��f'i
6; �.
;��,` SAVE AND C:tCCP" the *vllawinq dcic:lbed preparty� �� ;J
„j,.;' ���
� P4qlnliing at t!n iron �in in County Road Na. 1043 (Greenburg Rond) '
rhl.ch iQ loe4ted a95.44 Leet £ust and '77 .95 feet Nerth oE kh, {'�,� �
3a�itl�wt�et cornez o! ehe D. C. Graha�a �onation Land Claim N0. 52, '��`'
i�t SACtion 35, TowesShip ! Sauth. Range 1 Hest of the willamotte ��>+'
� � HOxl.didlt� ln the Caunty 4� Wa9h.ington and State ot Oregon� thonr,e ~u� +
North 62•24' Enst a]5.54 Eeet to an iron piqi Chonca Narth '�� ''
'�F-.
' -' ,, 25'9'34' He9c 14•4D leat to an iron pini thcncn North 73•17' 30'
� � � .� � r " Ea9t 44.02 tcot tv en iron pin� ehcnce South �7•03' Eaae �0.21 �
r n, °
�..;��iA �r ; fsot to an iron pin !.n the etoe.h 2�ne of oreqon E1c�t��G r£ght o!
�� ���i�;°{ Wayi thence SouLh 52•5� ' Neat 305.�3 feet aleng thc Nocth llnc� o.` �
�^r^� �k�'�� � aeid oregen £l,ee�r�c right ot �aay to an iron pin Sn ccntar o`. •
'� � ;�� COUf1iy ROdd7 thence HoZth 20�]7� WeSt B5•50 feet aler.g �he Gwnt9c i
$ ��.�'.
.� �`` �'� ; af seid Aead te thc }�oint n! beglnnSnq. p ;;,��
;� ��;� ��
� ,
f.., ,. ��
� � r�'
�. r a� ,�
�9�
��� °*
4:�.� �� E�iHIE3IT "A' � -
�. .� � �,:
�� ��t 4��.
,� �:
�., ��� � _ .�':..F� — .ti r' �!.�; �T .4�
-- - 1 5�3 681 2882 P. 11 I,
HPR-�4-199? 16�41 WASH.C0.CDt1M.D���LPMT. i
NCDA WASHINGTON REPORT
qpril 4, 1997 ■ Page a
At the reqUest of the membership NC�A wiil also hold at e f�°grams and ask�quest 4ns of
aftemoon to enable members to exchange mhee�a�To �ccommodate this session , NCDA
one another in a casua1 unstructured atmosp
ia raquesting that any msmb�rs who would ��rams sh uld�endt n$descr ptions of the
community develop�nt and/or housing pro9
ro rams as well as come to the conference prepared to sh�re, in an informa� tormat,
p e details of the program with other NCDA membe�s CDA,9202),293-587 or,send i`n
th aret McGrlvray, at N (
you have any quesiions, contact Marg
ro ram information to her attentian. Tne more participation, the more us�ful t}�is session! I
p g �
Wefcomin Rece tion: The annual recept'son wiil be heldtfrnoe Pla� to�joa p� at the Ch�cago
i
Cultur�l Center and will feature NCDA s traCemark g��d
Tuesdav. J ne i
The important HUD �riotings sassion w+f1 begin at�ae all admir�astra`tioen of the CDBGgHOME,
staff from the Chicago field office (responsible fo
and homeless programs) on hand to address your qu�tio��t���ICeCOfiCommunity
Cuomo and/or h+s yet to be appoint�d Assistant Sacre ry
Plenning and Development have been invited to attenc� as welf.
h Technical Sesgion has been moved to 12:30 - 2�� pm °�Suoncessfu� Mode1��t{ed,
T e
The TEAM" Approach #o Housmg for Homeowners �p
,� ��
Pub{ic and Private Collaboration on the �o�� Leve1 a Th�►ac�m.P��eQn��� �'�� °ut�ne
how a strategic plan and a "team� or local partnership pp
9
overnment, lenders, private developers. nanprofits and The team pproach has proven to
results for local building and rebuilding of cvmmun� 1e rivate sectors in housing development --
be very effective in bringing togethe� the public and p
don't miss this session!!
For those who will be stay►ng in Chicago on Tuesday evening, p�ease join us fior a speciaf
social even'..
As the deta+ls c` the conference become finalized,�N CpA W��agohat NCDA's'second
meantime, we hope to see yo� in June �n the W y Y
Anr+ual Confer�nce away from home (�utside Washington, DC}. This meeting promises to
be a mast exciting event!
NUD DEVE�QPS NEW COMMUNf7`f PLANNING SOFTWARE
HUD intends to release later in April a new �enerat�he���s onum kpig pro ess atlound the�s
designed to help citizens analyze and participate �n t
v�s of federal, state and Iocal hous��g �n� community develppment resources.
APR-�4-Lqq� 16�42 WASH.CO.cor�r�.DULFMT. 1 5�� 681 2�°2 P. 12
�
NCDA WASHiNGTON REPORT
sAprii a, 1997 e P�ge �
SundaY._Jun� S
A significant p4rtion af Sunday is devoied ta Association business, including Regionai
Caucuses which allow NCDA Regions to ele�t representation on the nationaf 8oard of NCDA
and conduct other regional business. Time has also been set �side far the NCDA
Cpmmittees to meet ta discuss current +ss�es and advise the NCDA boa�rd on poiicy issues.
S ecial Canfer nt - Chica o Biues Festival. The City of Chi�ago has obtained a
consia�rab�e, though limited, numbef of tiekets ta the famous 'Chicag� Blu�s Festiva!" which
wi11 be availab{e to Conference attendees an�l th►eir guests_ NCDA members will be fr�e to
wa{k over to the �estival, located just a few b{ocks fram the hvtel, which begins �t �:QQ pm
and run� ta 9:OQ pm and enjoy the music �nd reveiry!
Mondav, June 9
Monday afternoon is jam packed with thought provoking and interactive eoncurrent
workshops, topical round tables �nd a program swap se�sion•
Three new �oncurrent Sessions have been scheduled fior the Annuai Conferenee. T�►ey
lnclude: Natural Disastersl! Is Your Community Prepared?: A Dis�ster Man�gement
S�ssion ", a session developed out of an NCDA technical assistance project currently
underway to help local govemments deal with disasters and identify the rQles, responsibilities
and duties of local players in the aiterrnath af a natural disaster;
"Micro-�nterprise�: +Opening Up New Oppdrtunities for Cammunity Economic
�mpowerment°, a forum to discuss the latest breakthroughs in the development and use of
micro-enterprises and their role in Ic�cal econom+c develapment strategies and responses to
wetifare reform; and, `Neighborhoo�! DQveiopment Initisti�es: Forging Unique
Partnerships to Revive G�mmuni#ies°, will provide conferenCe atiend�s with an
opportunity to Iook at severai unique local partnerships that have been developed between
the local government and public housing and edu�ation entities in efforts to bring life back to
�n enfire neighborhood.
A series of Topical Roundtables have also been scheduled to pr�vide members with the
opportunity to discuss in detail sp��ifi� 'hot issues' in smalf group settings. The titles
include:
"�ection 108 - New Guidelines �nd New pirQCtion";
"The Latest About iD1S"; °Brownfietds - tndustria! Rete�tion/Deveiopmeni";
"Lead eased Paint and it's Signific:�nt lmpact on t��using �evelopment";
"Fair Hausing Ptans -- 1s Your Community Housing Fairly?";
"HUD's Mui#ifamily Reeingineering Dernonstration -- A Top Administration Priority."
APR-24-1?q7 lE�43 I,Ja�H.C0.C01�1��1.DVLPMT. 1 5�� E�1 2882 P. 1.:,
NCDA WASHINGTON Ft�pORT
April 4, 1997 ■ Page 2
Some of the most noteworthy CD Week activities undertaken in 1997 incfude: Hamebuyer
Fairs in �ev�ral communities; CD Week banners hung across Main 5treet(s) and on City
Hail; an annual CDBG Softb�ll Game between two "rivalry° entitlement communities/teams; a
"Fun f�ay" in a target neighborhood to acknowledge #he participation of the residents af the
neighb�rhood and the productive work of the area nan-profits; dis�lay of CD Week bik4boards;
and, lawn s'sgns on CDBG projects.
NCDA Legi�lative Counsel, Margaret McGiivray jo+ned in the CD Week celebrations in
Baltimore, MD and Bridgeport, C7, providing remarks in the Lafayette Square area of
Baltimore and during irie "CD Weak Luncheon' in Bridgeport. Throughout the country
National Community Devefopment VUeek received considerable attention and once again
reminded slected afftciais and c�tizens of t�e powerful impact this program has on the �ives of
the low and moderats incom� residents of thsir cammunities.
A few posters and postcards r�main in stoek, if your communi�y is still interested in ardering
some additional items, contact Karen Means at NCDA for further information. Enclosed
please find a list af ali those communities that registered their participation in National CD
Wsek 1997. It's not to early to begin pianning for next years CD Week Ce�ebration!
PREPARAT10N5 FOR NCDA ANMUAL CONF�RENCE UNDERWAY - SESSIONS TAKE
SHAPE
The NCDA Annual Meeting, June 7-10, 1997, is taking shape. The Conference will be held
at The Palmer House Hilton Ho#el locateti at 17 East Monroe Street, �n the heart of
downtown Chicago. The hotel is conveniently located near shops, restaurants and
transportation so plan to came and enjoy both the conference and the city.
Plsase note, for those of you arriving early on Saturday and wish to register early, the NCDA
Reaistration Desk will be open on Saturday, June 7 from 12:00 noon until 5:00 pm for you�
convenience.
Some cf the workshop high!ights include:
Saturdav. June 7
The Annual Conference program kicks off Saturday afternoon, June 7, with two �alf-day
sessions. These sessions +nclude, "CDBG: Nuts and Bolts", a workshop, that is back by
popular demand, designed to provide the basic elements of how to establiah and implement
a successtul local community development (CDBG} program. We have also scheduled a
new companion session entitied> 'The Ins and Outs af H�M� -- A Re#resher Caucse".
This "refresher" course on the Home Investment Partnerships (HOME) Program will provide
a background on the basics of the HOME program as well as the changes that have resul�e�
from the publication of the HOME Final Rule.
� .
i
A�FIDA�IT OF POSTING NOTIC�
WITHIN SEVEN(;� C��L,ENDA.R DAYS OF TF�SIGY POSTING.RETLIR'�1 THIS AFFIDAVIT TO:
, . ...... . . ,:City o�Tigarci.. . .
<, .
.
. :� :.. .� Pla.nning Division . . . . � _..�
.... .. .;._ _.... . _... .... . . .
_ ..
� 131�5 SW Hall Boulevard . .
Tigard,OR 97223 �
I, , , �;� �• , do affirm that I am (represent) the party initiating
interest in a pr pos�ci � h � �� , affec*.ing the land
Iccated at (state the ap roximate location(s) if no��a re� (s) and/or tax lot(s) currently
registered) � � � I � i C � , and
did on the_�,_ day of ��
19 �. pei-sonaily post notice indicating that the site may be propose� for a � �
i l��_��rrv,�-� application, and the time, date and piac� of a neighbofiaed
me�ting to discuss the proposaf.
sign was oste�d at � � '
� � �
(state (ocation you posted notice on propefij)
r
,
Signature � n the pres�nce of a Notary Public)
CfH15 SKT10iV FOR A SfATE OF ORfGON, NOTARY PUBLIC TO COhtPtFTFlNOTAR�Zq
Subsc;ibed and swom/affirmed before me on the� day of �.�� , 19�
._.,,;-.,,.
_ OFFICIAL SEAL �
;,� MARY CHAPMAN �
NOTARY PUBLiC-OREGON ;
< /
COMMISSION N0.055006 � � C N
'r:'' C�MMISSION EXPIRES JUN 29, 200C �:. NO i ARY PUBLIC O OR�G
� - �� My Commissian Expires: la 2-� -Z00�
(-�an3ic�t, please qnplerz inior*�stion�elow for proper placemen�w-ir.�proposed project)
�==-------------------------------------------------------------------�
r�l� OF PROJEGT OR PROPOSED NA.I�:
�TYPE OF PROPOSED DEYELOP.I��'T: �
��iame of�pplicanvQwner. �
I�ddress or Geaeral L,ocatioa of Subjert Properry: �
�Su�'ecz?-ooe^r .az tiia� s aad La� � �
�—�------T---��----=�—�=--------------------------------- --�
—n•:b9m�uCy4r.auentarTpas�lrss
� .
AFFIDA�7I'� OF �iAiLING
ST.43`E OF OREGON )
� ) ss.
City o�Tl�ard ) �
I, n, ; being duiy swom, deposz
and say that on -� � �-- 19�, ! cause� to have mailed to each
of tt�e Fersans on the attache� list, a notice of a meeting to discuss a proposed
deve!opment at (or near) �
��r ; 1��; � � �, �' ��
_ . _ � , �
a capy of which notice so maile�i is attached hereto and made a part of hereof.
I further s:ate that said notices were enciosed in envelopes plainly address� to said
persons and were de�osited on the date indicated a�ove in the United States Pcst
��71C..° �OC2tEd �t Cl�� � t,r1 �- � 1�lCL� n -�' . ,
with postage prepaid thereon. ,,� '
/ �/,P� � � �/ °'� �
Signature � (In the presenc� or a Notary Public)
J
(TN15 SKTION f�OR A STATE OF ORf�ON, NOTARY PUBLIC TO COMPLFrE'NOT.�RiZ�J
Subs�ri�eti and swomlamrmed before me an the �J ` day of ��G�'�- , 19�?
J�.':��..:' ''��
OFFICIAL SEAL �
„�,� MARY CHAPMAN ;�
-?J, ` NOTARY PUBLIC-OREuON �,�
COMMISSION N0.055006 �
�,tv C.qMMISSION EXPIRES JUN 29, Zooc�; NOTARY PUBLlC OF OREvON
.�
My Commission Expires: (a-Z� 2-D ��
(_�ppuc�t. =:esse camplete iniormatoa below;or prJper placPmenL wich propesed proje�)
�---------------------------------------------- �
----------------------
`?�ti1E OF P�OJECT OR P�OPOSED N�,.tifE:
�TYPE OF PROPOSED DE'��LJP'�fE`�'T: �
��1ame oi�ppiicaac`Owuer �
��d'c..-ess or Geaeral?acarioa oc Suaject P-oper^f �
' I
L uojec=Pr�Fe_:�Tas tilaDis' aad:atT�;' ----------------------------------1
-----------�-----�---------------
�:'JOOrf�caN�na�cs�'r.tia�!r.s
/ \
a
� �
, ., March 5, 1997
� � RE: Interfaith Outreach Services
� Residential Independence Training and Education(RITE) Center Project
w � Dear Interested Party.
� Ot Interfaith Outreach Senzces��ith the communities of Tigard Tualatin and Bearerton
� are undertaking a proje�-t to build a Residential lndependence Training and Education
� Center for homeless families and indi�zdUals in Eastern 1Nashington Countv. The
� facility w7ll replace the current shelter facilit��that has been located in the Tigard United
� Methodist Church for the past eight�ears.
��
� � 1fie Architectural firm of Van Lom/Edwards is representing Interfaith Outreach
� o Services who is purchasing the property located at 11130 and 11070 SW Greenburg Rd.
� in Tigard.
�i
� 1�Ve are proposing a 7,500 square foot,one sion Resideniial Shelter w�hich�vill also
� house Se1f-Sufficiency�Program sen�ices. Program offices a�ili be located in the existing
� � ttvo story house on the pmperty.
� �� Prior to appl��ing to the City of Tigard for the necessarv permits.we would like to
discuss the proposal in detail with the surrounding propem�owners and residents. You
� � are imzted to attend a meeting to discuss this project on:
� � DATE: Wednesda�•,Mareh 26, 1997
0
� � LOCATION: IOS Office
� � 9020 SW Buroham SL
� Tigard,OR 97223
o � Between 8a11 Blvd. and Main Street
� TIME: 7:OOP'.VI
� Please note that this will be an informational meeting on preliminary plans. These
� � plans may be altered prior to the subnuttal of the application to the CiR�.
� � We wzli ha��e a project description a�ailable for}•ou at the March 26th meeting.
� �
j 0 We look forn�ard to more specifically discussing this proposal�ith}�ou. For more
wC�1 information please contact IOS Executive Director. Kim Bro�ti-n at 598-03�9.
� �
W �
0 Si�ccrel��.
� �
• �
� 0 Kim Bro�rn, Ezecud�c Director
�� �
"Troni th� fit��elE���,�rie��•.�• �1,f���1'�rtti• to the puu�er of ijtclepen�lc��r�•�►. "
�IT F�CILTT�TORS
���� �4uTH
�+�Y �Ei'ey 5ue Carver �
7-L35 5W H�vsa lO1SS SW Soodview DrirQ
Ti�srd, OR 97223 - T(gard, OR 9"TZ2�
G30-8593 (� 639$507 (H)
�tark vtt�hat� � Sterliag►vtarsh
i�3io sw 91� iaa�o sw soc� co�c
Ti�ard, OR 97a23 Tigard, OR 9'7224
6B�6IO2 (� 639-?T39 � �
'�.t-2fl00 (ti1� � 3gp.�S3pp (ti�
:��.Q756 (F�
doba W�ms
S�i'k'Y E� 113�5 SW 121st AYmue
LZO�U Sw Hoodv�ew Drjve 'I"�rd, 4R 97Z24 .
Tig�rd. OR 97''_3 �3rs (i.� -
�-=� (� 6-t2-361t ltih
293-fiE96 (Vh
Bob Bledsoe -
11800 SW WaLaut
Tigard, OR 97Z23 .
590-2340 �
Jim Correli
I3321 SW l�iichz!!�t Court Post-it'Fax Note 7671 oue �,9;;►
T`�� �j�q�� To a Fro _
5.'.;-987Q {I� co.� ��.�
�oO�Oi/�� i.Aa. i7l. � ne 1i PMOrlO�
F9�x 1� e�, Fax b
Crai� I�Lri;se�
9131 S1�V Fiill Sa�eet � � �- � . '
Tigard, OR qT�3
d20--�829 (f�
�23-3993, Ext. 3=939 (ti�
693-179'9 (FaY -Jaciae)
Pameta l�foyets
1�718 SSY Graz�dview Laae ;
Tigard. OR 9??��
:9a-310.�, (H) �
b3�i-959S (� '
Re.ised U97 i:ladm►jo�bd&coma.dac
�
. .-- - -- -- - --- - - - -- - - - - - - - - a
..- - - -- - _ . .. . - � - - - - - f
Site; : *NO SITE ADDRESS* Xf� .
Mail :4550 SW LOMBARD AVE BEAVEP.TON OR 97005 Price .
Use : 4902 RES, COMMON PROP, PLANNED COMMUNITY Tot AV :
Lega1 :ASH CREEK CONDOP�iINIUM, COMMON
:ELEMENT, NON-ASSESSABLE Taxes .
Phone .
Censue :Tract Block MapGrid: RefPar# :1S135CA 90000
Bedrm: Sth: YB : Gar: Pool : S1dgSr^: Ac :
* 2 *-- ------ - -- - -- - - --- . MetrpScan/Washington . - ------------ --- --- --- -----*
Owner:W�STCOTT DAVID R Parcel :R116433].
Site : *NO SITE ADDRESS* Xferd .
Mai� : 5828 SW CHELTENHAM DR PORTLAND OR 97201 Price : $14 , 500
Use : 1912 RES, CONDOMINIUMS Tot AV : $40 , 150
Lega1 :ASH CREEK PARK CONDOMINIUM, INT IN
: COMMON ELEMEN'T, BLOCK A, LOT 113 Taxes :$555 . 82
Phone .
Cen�us :Tract Block MapGrid: RefFar# : 1S135CA 9Q7.7.3
Bedrm: i B�h: 1 . 00 YB :1979 Gar: Poo1 : B1dgSr^:596 Ac :
* 3 *------- - --- ----- - -- . MetroScan/Washington . ---------------------------_*
Owner :MITCbiELL RQNALD P Parcel :R1i54377
Sit� : *NO SITE ADDRESS* Xferd : Q1/Q3/95
rSail : 1�9%o S'�t 109TH AVE TIGARD OR 97224 Price .
Use : 1912 RES, CON�DOMINIUMS Tot AV : $51, 080
L�gal :ASH CREEK F�RK CCIVDOM=NIUM, INT IN
:COMMON ELEMENT, BLOCK B, LOT 125 :axes : $707 .14
Fhone :503-639-0112
Cen�u� :Tract Block MapGrid: RefPar# : 1S135CA ?4125
$edrm: 2 Bth: 1 . 00 YB:1979 Gar: Paol : B1dgSF: 856 Ac :
* 4 * ---- - -- --------- --- : MetroScan/washington : ---------_--------- ---------*
Owner:RHEATJLT BARRY R�BERT & JAD,�T LEE Parcel :R1164386
Site : *NO SIT� ADDRESS* Xferd : O1/02/97
Mail : 17380 �W F..ART WAY ALOHA OR 97007 Price : $54 , 150
Use : 1912 RES, CONDOMINIUMS T�� AV : 551, 080
Lega1 :ASH CREEK PARK CONDOMINTUM, INT IN
: COMM�N ET�EMENT, BLOGK B, LOT 126 Taxes :$707 . i4
Pr.one .
Ccr.sus :Tract Block MapGrid: Ref�ar# : 1S135CA 90126
Bedrm: 2 Bth : 1 . 00 YB : ].979 Gar: FoGI : BJ.dgSF: 856 Ac :
� 5 *- -- - - --- -------- --- : MetroScan/Washington : -- -------------- ------------*
Owner:MA.�SH ALGER HERBERT Farcel :R1164395
Site : *NC SITE ADDRESS* Xferd .
Mail : 259G WARWICK ST WEST LINN OR 97068 Pr=ce : $�:9 , 954
Use : 1512 R�S, COND4MINIUNIS Tot AV : 553 , 450
Lega1 :AS�i CREEK PARK CONDOMIN?LTM, INT IN
: CON�iON ELEME�IT, BLOCK B, LOT 127 Taxes : 5739 . 95
Phol�e : �0�-657-4141
Census :Tract Block MapGrid: RefPar#: 1S135CA 90127
$edrm: 2 Bth: 1 . 00 Yn : 197g Gar: Pool : B1dgSF: e56 Ac :
The Information P�ovided Is Deemed. Reliable, But za Not Guaranteed.
� 6 *-- - - - -- --- - - -- -- - -- : MetroScan/Washington : --- --------------- - - --- - -- --*
)wnex :WILHELM FREDDIE R Parcel :R1164466
3it� : *NO SITE ADDRESS* Xferd :11/08/96
R�il : 11150 SW GRE�NBURG RD #150 TIGARD OR 97223 Price : $54� 900
Jse : 1g�2 RE�, CpNilOMIN2LTMS Tot AV :$53 , �50
�ega1 :ASH CREEK PARK CONDOMINIUM, INT IN
:COMMON ELEMENT, BLOCK C, LCT 150 Taxes : $739 . 95
Phone .
�ensu� :Tract $lock MapGrid: RefPar# : 1S135CA 90150
Bedrm: 2 Bth: 1 . 00 YB : 1979 Gar: Pool : B1dgSF: 856 Ac :
* 7 �_ _______ ___ _______ : MetroScan/Waehington . ----------------"" - --- - -- -- -*
�wner:ACORD JON & SUSAN M Parcel :R11.64509
Site : *NO SITE ADDRESS* Xferd :12/23/93
Mail : 10496 SE 98TH CT PORTLAND OR 97266 Price :$35, 000
�se : 1912 RES, C4NDOM2N2UMS Tot AV : $42 , 520
Lcga1 :ASH CREEK PARK CONDOMINIUM, INT IN
: COMMON ELEMENT, BLOCK A, LOT 206 Taxes : 5588 . 62
Phone .
Census :TracC. Block MapGrid: RefPar# :1S135CA 90206
Bedrm: 1 Hth: � . Od YB :1979 Gar: Poo1 : 81dgSF:596 Ac :
* 8 *-- - - -- - - -- --- - ----- : Met�oScan/Wa�hington : __�--------___--- ------ - -- --*
Owner:$ECCHETTi JOHN J & MARY Pa�cel :R1164518
Site : *NO SITE ADDRESS* Xferd .
Mail : 3300 WEBSTER ST ORKLPSTD CA 94609 Pr1Ce : $39, 950
Use : 1912 RES,CONDOMINIUMS Tot AV : 542 , 520
Lega1 :ASH CREEK PARK CONDOMINIUM, INT IN
:COMMON ELEM�N'�, BLOCK A, LOT 2�7 phorie : 5108834--7421
Census :Tract Block MapGrid: RefPar#:1S135CA 90207
Bcdrm: l Bth:1 . a� �: 1979 Gar: Pool : B1dgSF:596 Ac ' _�___
* 9 *-------.. ----- ------ . MetroScanJWashington . -------------------- -- -*
Owner:AAZAD ALI Parcel :R7.7.54�27
Site : *NO SITE ADDRESS* Xferd : 09/09/94
Mail : 11040 Sw GREEN$URG RD #208 TIGARD OR 97223 TatCAV :$42 , 520
�T�z : 1912 RES, CONDOMINIUMS
Lega1 :ASH CREEK PARK CONDOMINIUM, INT IN Taxes : $588 . 62
: C4MMGN ELEMENT, BLOCK A, L�T 248
Phone .
Census •Tract Block MapGrid: RefPar# : 1S135CA 90208
Bedrm: l Eth: 1 . 0� Y8 : 1979 Gar: Poo3. : S1dgSF:596 Ac:
g : --- -------------------------*
� 10 *------- -�-_-- ---- - : MetraScan/Waehin ton
owner :WESTCOTT �AVID R Parcel :R1164536
Si�e : �NO SITE ADDRESS* :�ferd •
Mail : 5828 SW CHELTENFiAM DR �ORTLAND OR 97201 TotCAV : $42 , 520
Use : 1912 RES, CGNDOMINItTNIS
Lega1 :ASH CREEx PP,RK COND�MINIUM, INT IN Taxes : S�SB . 62
:CCMMON ELEMENT, BLOCK A, LOT 217
Phone .
C���us :Tract Block MapGrid: RefPar# : 1S135CA 90217
Bcdrm: l Bth: 1 . 00 XB: 1979 Gar: Pool. : B�daSF: 596 Ac :
The Inf�rrnation Provided Is Deemed Reliable, But Is Not Guaranteed.
* 61 *--- ------- - --- ---- • MetroScan/washingtan --� - ----- --- -- ----- - - -
• - -----*
Owner :�ATNTER ALLEN C & �ANET SUE Parcel :R1164858
Site : 11150 SW GREENBURG RD TIGARD 97223 Xferd
Mail : 311Z SE TINDALL CIR PORTLAND OR 97202 Price : $48, 950
Use :1912 RES, CON'DOMINIUMS Tot AV : $53 , 450
Lega1 :ASH CREEK PARK CONb�MINIUM, INT IN
:COMMON ELEMENT, BL,OCK C, L�T 358 Taxes : $739 , 95
' Ph�ne : 503-231,0875
Cen�us :Tract 349 . 00 Black 1 NIapGrid: 655 D2 RefQar#:1S135CA 90358
Bedrm: 2 Bth: 1 . QQ YB:I979 Gar: Pool : B1dgSF:856 Ac :
* 62 *------------�--,-- : Metroscan/Washingtan . -------------------- -- - _*
dwner.S�OAN THOMAS J & DELLA J Parcel :R1164359
Sit� : 11I50 SW GREEiVaURG RD TIC3�RD 97223 Xferd : 05/23/96
Mail : PO BOX 610 FACIFIC CITY OR 97135 Frice :�49, OOd
Use : 1912 RES, COND�MINIUMS Tot AV : $42 , 520
Lega� ;ASH CRE�K PARK CONpOMINIUM, INT IN
:CON�,'KQN ELEMENT, BLOCK A, LO'I' 115 Taxe s : $5 8 8 . 6 2
� �hone
Ce:isus :Tract 309 . 00 Block 1 MapGrid: 655 DZ RefPar# : 1$135CA 90i15
Se�,rm: 1 Bth: I . OQ YB : 1979 Gar: Pool : B1dgSF: 596 Ac :
* 63 *- --- - ----- ------ - . M�troScan/Washington . ------------------------- --_*
Owner:BYRNS GEORGE F Parcel :R1Z64448
Site : 11160 SW GREEN�URG RD TIGARD g7223 Xferd : 10/13/93
Mail : i1Q48 SW GREENBURG RD #140 TIGAR.D OR 97223 �rice : $39, OQ0
L'se : 1912 RES, CQNDOMZNIUMS Tot AV :$53 , 450
Lega1 :ASH CREEK PARK CON170MINIJM, INT TN
:COMM�N ELENlENT, BLOCK B, LOT �40 Taxe$ : $739 . 95
� Phan�
C�n�us :Tx�act 3p9. 04 Block 1 MapGrid:655 D2 RefP�r# : 1S135CA �oi4a
Bedrm: 2 Bth; 1 . pQ Y8:1979 Gar: l�ool : B1dgSF:856 Ac :
* 64 *---- -- ------- - ---- . MetroScan/Washiagton . --------------------------_*
Own�r:CHAPMAN JOHN H & ELAINE L F-4356 Parcel :R1164607
�ite : lIZ�O SW GREENgURa RD TIGARD 97223 Xferd
Mai1 :�0112 SW TRP�p�ER TER BEAVERTON OR 97408 Price ; $43 , 501
Jse : 1912 RES, �QNDpMINIUMS Tot AV :$53 , 450
L�ga1 :ASH CREEK PARK CpNDOMINILTiK, INT IN
:COMMON ELE;+�ENT, BLOCK B, LpT 232 Taxes : $739 . 95
' Phone
Census :Tract 309. 00 Block i MapGri3: E55 D2 RefPar# : 1S135CA 90232
Bedrm: 2 Bth: 1 . 00 YB:1979 Qar; Poo1 : B1dgSF; 856 Ac :
* 65 *----- - -- ---------- . MetroScan/Wasr.ington . ----------------- - - ,- ---- - --*
Owner:LA:'�TGFUS A.A,RGN Parcel :RQ27405�k
Site : �1200 SW GR�ENBVRG RD TIGARD 97223 Xf�rd
Mail :PO BQX 2092 FORTLAND OR 97208 Price
Usc : 7012 RES,MULTIPLE hOUSING, IMPROVEMENTS Tot AV : $2 , 035, 370
Legal :ACRES 2 . 51
• Taxes : $28 , 176 . 86
• Phone .
C�nau� :Tract 309 . G0 Blaek 1 MapGrid: 655 D3 RefPar# : 1S135CA o0600
Bedrm : Bth: YB ; Gar: Poo]. ; B1dgSF: Ac :2 . 51 �
The Infornation Provided Is Deemed Reliable, But Ia Not Guarar.teed.
* s6 * - - - - -- - - -- - - --- - --- . Me�roScan/Washington . � -- - -- --- - --- -- - - -- - - - -- - - -*
Owrzer :ENZQR NORMAN RAY Parcel :R2164457
Site : 11150 SW GREENBURG RD TIG�� 9�223 Xferd : 11/�0/93
Mail : 11150 SW �REENBURa RD #149 TIGA.RD OR 97223 Price : $44, 300
'Jae : 1912 RES, CONDOMINIUMS Tot AV : $42, 52Q
L�ga1 :ASH CREEK PARK CONDOMINi'JM, INT IN
: COMMON �LE�+IENT, BL�CK C, LOT 149 Taxes : $588 . 62
• Phone .
Census :T�act 309 . 00 $lock 1 Ma�Grid: 655 D2 RefPax##; 1S135CA 9p149
Bedrm: l Bth: 1 . Q0 XB : 1979 Gar: Pool : B1dgSF: 596 Ac :
* 57 *---------------- -- . Metx�oScan/Washingtan . -- --- ------- ---- - --�-- ------*
Owner:REDDICK BR[,T�� E Parcel :R1164475
Site : 11�,50 SW GREENBURG RD TIGARD 97223 Xferd : 02/27/96
Mail : PO BO�C 2018 BEAv�RTCN 4R 97075 Price : $30 , 500
Uae : 1912 RES, COND4MINIUMS Tot RV :$42, 520
L�gA1 :ASH CREEK PARK CONDOMINIUM, INT IN
: COMMON ET�EMENT, BLOCK C, LOT 151 Taxes ; $588 . 62
• Phone
Cen�us :Tract 309 . aQ Block L MapGrid: 655 D2 RefPar# - 1S135CA 90151
Bedrin•: 1 Bth: 1 . 00 YB: 1979 Gar; Pool : B?dgSF: 596 Ac :
* 58 *------- --- -------- . MetroScan/Washington . --------� ------------------*
Owner:SERGEYEVA YELENA B Parcel :R1164870
S`_tc : 11150 SW GREENBL7RG RD TTGA.�tD 97223 Xferd ; Q8/17/95
Maii :11154 SW GREENBURG RD #36d TIGARD OR 97223 Price :$56, 000
Use : 1912 RES,CONDOMINIUMS Tat AV : $53 , 450
�,ega1 :ASH CREEK PARK CONDQMINIUM, INT IN
:CONII�ION ELEMENT, BLOCK C, LQT 360 Taxes :$739 . 95
• Phone .
�ensus :Tract 309. 00 Black 1 MapGrid:655 D2 RefPar# :1Si35GA 9b360
Bedx�m:2 8th:1 . 00 YS : 1979 Gar; Pool : B1dgSr^: 856 Ac :
* 59 *-- ---------- - -- - -- . MetroScan/Washingtan . -------------------------- --*
�w*1�r :LUTE STEVEN C Parcel :R11&4�84
3ite : 11150 SW CiREEN$URG RD TIGARD 97223 Xferd : 04/14/93
Mail : ].1150 SW GREENBiIRG RD TZGARD OR 97223 Price :$47, OOp
Use : 191� RES, CO�TDOMINIUMS Tot A� : $51, 080
Legs1 :ASH CREEK P�IRK CCNDOMINIUM, TNT IN
: CO?�ON �LEMENT, BLOCK C, L�T 15� T�txes : $707 . 7.4
• Phone .
Cen$uS :TraCt 3Q9 . 00 SloCk 1 MapGrici: 555 D2 RefP3r## : 1S135CA 90152
Bedrm: 2 Bth: 1 . 00 Y8; 1979 Gar: Poo1 : B1dgSF:856 Ac :
* 60 *-- ----------- ---- - . MetroScan/washington . --- --------- --� -- -----�- ---*
Owr.er:LP,W�-IORN RAYMOND T Parcel :R1164 6 5 2
Site : 11150 SW C3RE�NBURG RD TiGARD 972Z3 Xferd .
Mail : 11150 SW GREENBURG R� #253 TIGARD OR 9722? Price : $35 , 423
Use : I91� RES, CONDOMINIL'MS Tot AV : $42 , 520
Lega1 :ASH CREEK PARK CONDOMINIG'M, INT IN
: COMMON ELEMENT, BLOCK C, LOT 253 Taxes : $588 . 62
. Phane .
Cen�u6 :Tract 309 . Q0 Block I MapGrid: 655 D2 RefPar# : 1SI35CA 90253
Bedrm: l Bth: 1 . 00 YP : 1979 Gar: Pool : B1dgSF: 596 Ac :
T'�e Informatian Provided Is Deemed Reliable, But Is Nat Guaxanteed.
* 5� •--- -------------- - . N,��ro8can/Washington . --- - --------------- ---------*
Owner:ATLAS MARK Parcel :R115�812
�itE : 11Q48 SW GREENBURG RD #346 TIGARp 9�223 Xferd : 08/15/94
Mail : 1104$ SW GREENBURG RD #34E TTGARD OR 97223 Frice : $43 , 000
Use : 1912 RES, CdNDaMINIL]MS Tot AV : $53 , 450
Lega1 :ASH CREEK PARK CONDOMINIL7M, INT IN
:COMMON EI,EMENT, BLOCK g, LCT 345 Taxes : $739 . 95
• Phone .
Census :Traet 309 , 00 Block 1 MapGrid: 655 D2 RefPar# : 1S��5CA 90346
Bed:m:2 Bth: 1 . 00 YS:1979 Gar: Pool : B1dgS,r^:856 Ac :
� 52 *---------�---- ----- . Metr4Scan/Washington . - - - ---------------- ---- --- -*
Owner :KIRKMAN JAY M Parcel :R027295b
Site : 11070 SW GREENBURG RD TIGRRD 97223 Xferd : 02/16/96
Mail : 11130 Sw GREE1vBURG RD TIGARD QR 97223 Price .
U$e : 701� RES,MULTIPLE HOUSING, TMPROVEMENTS Tot AV : $148 , 010
Lega1 :A�RES . 53
• Taxes : $2, 048 . 99
' Phone
Census :Tract 3Q9 . 00 Block 1 MapGrid: 655 D2 RefPar## : 1S135CA G26o0
Bedrm: 5 Bth: l , pp Y3: 1930 Gar: Ftiol : B1dgSF:1, 592 Ac : . S3
* 53 *------------- ----- . MetroScan/Washington . ---,---------------- ---- ----*
Owner:ROBINSON E LEE EVELYN L Parcel ;RC27312E
Site : 11101 SW GREENBURC3 Rb TIGARD 97223 Xferd
Mail : Z5375 1rTW w�ST UNION RD PORTL�ND OR 97229 Price .
Use : 2312 MISC,NON-MFG, IMPRQVEMENT, YND ZONE :ot AV :$2, 058, 880
Lega1 :ACRES 4 . 72
• Taxes : $28 , 502 . 30
• Phone .
Census :Tract 3Q9 . OQ Blcck 1 MapGrid: 655 D2 Refpar#:1S135BC 07.100
Bedrm: 8th: YB : Ga�: Pocl : S1dgSF: Ac : 4 . 72
* 54 *------------ ------ • MetroScan/Washington : -------- -------------------_*
Owner:FOREIGN MISSiON FOUNDATION Parcel :R1164297
Sit� : 1�143 SW GREENBURG R7 TIGARD 97223 Xferd .
MAil : 1Q875 $W 89TH A�IE TIGARD QR 97223 Pr�ce .
Us� :191� RES, CONDC)MINIUMS Tot AV : $40, 15p
L���1 ;ASH CREEK PARK CONDOMINIL'Ni, INT IN
:COI+�IIYtON ELEMENT, BLOCK A, LOT 101 Taxes :$555 . 82
• Phnne .
Census :Tract 309 . 00 Block 1 MapGrid: 655 D2 Refpar# : 1S135CA 907,Qi
Bedrm: l Bth: 1 . 40 YB: 1979 Gar: PooJ. : BIdgSF : 596 Ac:
* 55 *------�-- - ----- - -- . M�troSCan/Wabhington . --- ------- -- -- ----------- - -�
Owner:SEAMA.'V MARK H & LYNN & TRUSTEE Parcel :R116460'1
Sit� : 11150 SW GREENBURG RD TIGARD 97223 Xferd .
Mail : 8407 SW 58TH AVE PORTLAND OR 97219 Price : $47 , 450
Use : i912 RES, CONDOMIN?iTI�?S Tot AV : $53 , 45b
Lega1 :ASH CREEK PARK CONDOMZNIUM, INT �N
:COMMON ELEMENT, B�,OCK C, LOT 254 Taxes : $739 . 95
� Phcne : 503-246-9890
Census :Tract 305 . Q0 B1Q�k 1 MapGrid: 655 D2 RefPar# : 1S135�A 90254
Bedrtn: 2 Bth: 1 . 00 YB ; 1979 Gar: Pool : B1dgSr: 855 Ac :
The Information Provided Is Deemed Reliable, But Is Not Guaranteed.
'* 46 '*----� - - - ------- --- troScan/Washington ----- --------- -- _*
Owner:RpWLANDS CLEMENT B IY Farcel :R1164$30 �
Site : �1048 SW GRE�NBURG RD TIGARD 97223 Xferd : 1�/16/89
Mail : 11048 SW GREENBURG RD #348 TIGARD 4R 97223 �rice : $2Q , 50d
U8e : 19�2 RES, CONDOMINIUMS Tot AV : $53 , 450
Lega1 :ASH CREEK P1aRK CONDOMINIU;vi, INT IN
:COMMON ELE�EN''l, BLOCK B, LOT 34B Taxee : $��g . 95
' Phone
Census :Tract 309 . 00 Block 1 MapGrid,; 655 D2 RefP�r# : 1S135CA 90348
Be3r.n:� Bth: � . 00 YB: 1979 Gar: Pool : B�dgSfi:856 Ac :
* 47 �__ -- _-- • MetrQSCan/Washington . --------------� -- ----- --- -*
Owner:KQGAN GRIGORY & ALEXRNDRA Parcel :R1164821
Site : 11048 SW GREE:VBURG Rp TIGARD 97223 Xf��^d : OS/2$/96
Ma�l :43Z2 SW TERLYN CT PORTI,AND pR g7221, prj.ce :$42, 772
U�e : 1912 RES, CpNDOMINIUMS Tot AV : $53 , 45d
L��a1 :ASH CREEK PARK CONDOMINIL'M, INT IN
:CON�iqN ELEi�NT, BLOCK $, LOT 347 Taxes : $73g , g5
' Phone : 5a3-246-1274
Ccnsus :Tract 309 . 00 Blvck Z MapGrid: 655 D2 RefPar#: 1S135CA 90347
�edrm: � Bth: �„ 00 YB :1979 Gar: Pool : B1dg9F: 856 Ac:
* 48 *- ----- -----� - -- --- . M�trQSCan/Washington ---- --------- -- -- - - - _*
Owner:SMIT�i CHERyL A parcel :R1164411 �
Site : 17.p48 SW GREENBURG RD pORTLAND 97223 Xferd : 09/13/95
Mail : Z1048 SW GREENBURG RD #137 AORTLA,ND qR 97223 Price :$52 , 504
U�e : 1912 RES, �pP1DOMINI[7MS Tot AV ; $S1, 080
Lega1 :ASH CR��K pARK CONDOMINIUM, INT IN
: CGI�'iN.'ON ELEMENT, BLQCK B, LOT 13 7 Taxe s :$7 0 7 . 14
� Fhone
C�n�us :Tract 309 . Oa Block 1 Map�rid: 655 D2 RefPar# �1S135CA 9�137
Bedrm: 2 Bth: Z , 00 YB : 1979 Gax: Pool : 81dgSF; 856 Ac :
* 49 *- ------ ---- Metr�Scan/Waehingtor� . ---�------------- ------- ----*
Qwner:'I'HORN'I'ON CHRISTINE .& JASON Par�el :R1154625
Site : 1ZQ48 SW GREENBUF�G R� TIGARp 97223 Xferd : 09/27/90
Mail : 11048 SW GREENBURG RD TIGAR� 4R 97223 Price : $6�, 500
Use : 1912 RES, CONDOMINIUI�?S To� AV ;�48, 290
Lega? :.ASH CREEK PAR� CONDOM�NIUM, INT IN
:COhIlylQ�V ELEM�NT, BLOCK B, LOT 2 4 2 Taxe s : $6 6 8 . 5 0
' Phone
Cansus :Tract 3pg . 00 Block ], MapGrid:655 D2 RefPar# � 1Sa35CA 90242
Bedrm: 2 BCh: � . 00 YB: 1979 Gar: Pool : B1dgSF : 856 Ac :
* 50 *-- ------- --------- • MetxoScan/Washington . � ------------- ---- -- -------*
Owne�: FAFcKE� Dr'�VID HORACE Par�e1 :RZ�54643
Site : 1104$ SW GREENBVRG RD TIGARD 97223 Xferd
Mai� : 11048 SW GREENBL�RG RD #244 TIGARD OR 97223 Price � $49, 950
Use : 19zz R�$, CdNDOMINIUN!S Tot AV : $53 , 450
Legai :ASH CR�EK PARK CONDGMINIUM, INT IN
: COMMON ELEMENT, BLOCK B, LOT 24�4 Taxes : $739 . 95
' Phone .
Census :Trac� 309 . 00 B1pGk 1 MapGrid: 655 J2 RefPar# : 1S135CA 90?44
�e�ix'm: 2 Eth: 1 . 00 YB: 1979 Gar: Pool ; B1dgSr: 856 Ac:
The Infarmation Provided Is �eemed Reliable, But Ia No* Guaranteed.
*' 41 *'--- -- - - -- - - - ---- � ��. _roScan/Washington . ---- --- -- - --- -- ----- -- -- - --*
�w:�er :MENE$�S YVQN1�iE MICHELLE Parcel :R1164769
Site : 11046 SW GREEN$URG RD TIGARD 97223 Xferd : 09/10/96
riail : 11046 SW aREENBURG RD TIGARD OR 97223 Price : $52 , 000
Use : 1912 RES, CONDOMINIUMS Tot AV : $53 , 450
Lega1 :ASH CREEK PARK CONDOMiNIUM, INT IN
: COMMON ELEMENT, BLOCK $, LO'I' 333 Taxes : $739 . 95
• �hone .
Census :Tract 3Q9 . 00 Slock 1 MapGrid: 655 D2 RefPar# : 1S135CA 90333
Bedrm: 2 Sth: l . Qb YB : 1979 Gar: Pool : B1dqSF : 856 Ac :
* 42 *-�- ---- ----------- : MetraScan/Washington . ---------- ---- - - - ----- -----*
Owr.er:HAFLIGER CRr'1IG J & VICKI A ParCel :R1164796
Site :11046 SW GREENBURG RD TIGARD 972�3 Xferd : 08/30/95
MaiZ : 12609 SW SNOW BRUSH CT TIGA.RD OR 97223 Price .
Use : 19J,Z RES, CONDOMINIUMS Tot AV ; $53 , 450
LegaJ. ;ASH C�tEEIC PARK CONDOM2NIUM, INT IN
: COMMON ELEMENT, BLOCK B, LOT 336 Taxes : $739 . 95
• Phane ,
Census :Tract 3Q9 . OG Black 7. MapGrid: 655 D2 RefPar# : 1S135CA 90336
BedrM: 2 8th: 1 . d0 :B: 1979 Gar: �001 : B1dgSF: 856 Ac :
* 43 *------- - - ----- . MetroBcan/washington . --------�-- --- -- - ---- - -----*
Own�� :REML�Y FAYE A Parcel :R1164439
Si�c : 11048 SW GREENBURG RD TIGAR� 97223 Xferd
M�i'! : 11049 SW GREEN�I7RG RD #E139 TIGARD GR 97223 Price : $32, 300
Jse : 191� RES, CONDOMINIUNlS Tot AV :$53, 450
Legal :P.SH CR�EK PARit CCNDOMINIIIi�'I, INT IN
:COMMON ELEMEN�', BLOCK B, LOT 139 Taxes : $739 . 95
• Phone .
Census :Tract 309 . 00 81ock 7. MapGrid:G55 D2 RefPar## :1SZ35C?� 90139
�edrm: 2 Bth: 1 . Q0 YB:1979 Gar: Pool : B1dgSF: 856 Ac :
* 44 *----- -- - --- ------- . MctrcScan/Washingtan . ----------------------------*
Owner:DAL ZHANNA Parc�l :R1154G34
Site : 11048 �w GRE'ENBURG RD TZGA2D 97��3 Xferd :�.1/29/95
:�ail : 11048 SW GREENBURG Rb #�43 TIGARD OR 97223 Price : $54, 500
Use : 1912 RES, C�NDOMTNIUM9 To� �,V : $53, 450
Lega1 :ASH CREEK r�A.RK CONDOMINIiJM, INT IN
:COA+IMON �Z,EMENT, SLOCK B, LOi 243 T$xes : $739 . 95
• P:�one .
^er.atzs :T�'act 309 . d0 Block 1 MapGrid: 655 D2 RefPar# : iS135CA 902�3
�edrm: 2 Bth: 1 . 00 Y8: 197� Gar: Pool : B1dgSF: 856 Ac :
* 45 *-- --- - ------ ------ . MetroScan/Washington . --�--- ----------- - ---- ------*
�wner :BECKER RICHA.RD w Parcel :R1164420
Si*e : 11048 SW GRE�NBLTFcG �D TIGARD 97223 Xferd : b5/23/94
"�:ail : 7954 SW 48TH AVE PORTLAND OR 97219 Price : $48, 500
Jse : 1912 RES, CONDOMINIUM� Tot AV : $5�, 08Q ,
Lega1 :ASH CREEK pARK CONDOMINIUM, INT IN
: CONLMON ELEMENT, BI,OCK B, LOT 138 Taxes : $707 . 14
• Fhone : 503-246-�997
�er.sus :'"ract 309 . 00 Biock 1 MapGrid: 655 �2 RefPax## : 1S135CA 90138
3edrr.t: 2 Bth: 1 , Q0 YB : 1979 Gar: Poal : B1dgSF: 856 Ac :
Tne Information Provided 2s Deemed Reliab7.e, But Is Nor Guaranteed.
•. 35 *------- - -- -- - -�- - - . P roScan/Washing�on ------ - -
_ _ _ *
Owner ;JO�TES JA,� B Farcel :R1164368 �
Si�e : 11044 ,SW GREEIQ�3URC� Rp TIGARD 97223 Xferd
Mt�il : 11044 SW GRE�NBURG RD #11b TIGARp OR 97223 PriC� : $19, 000
Use ; 19Z2 RES, CONDOMINIUM$ Tot AV ; $42, 520
Leg�1 :ASH CREEK PAR:{ CONDOMIN�UM, INT IN
:C4NL�iGN ELEMEIQT, BLO�K A, LOT 116 Taxes : $588 , 62
' Phone ; 503-639-3027
�ensus :Trac� 309 . 00 81ock 1 MapGrid: 555 D2 RefPar# : 1S135CA 9�116
Hedrm:l Bth: 1 . 00 XB : 1979 Gar: Pool : BIdgSF; 596 Ac:
* 37 *• ------ --------- -- : MetrQScan/Washington : -------------- ------------- -*
owner:��'ORGITSA VLADIMIR A & YEFR�MOVA TATYANA D Parcel ;RZ164590
S�Ge : 11b46 SW GR�ENBURG RD TZGARD 97223 Xferd :10/31/96
Mail : 11046 $W GREENBZTRG RD #231 TIGA.RD OR 97223 Price : $61, 0p0
Use : 1912 RES, CONpOMINIUMS Tot AV ; $53 , 450
Legal :A,SH CREEK PARK CONDOMINZUM, INT IN
:COMMQN ELEMEN'�, BLOCK B, LOT 231 Taxes : $739 , 95
` Phone
Census :Tract 3Q9 . 00 Block 1 MapGrid: 65� D2 RefFar# c1S135CA 90231
Hedrm: 2 Bth: 1 . Qb :8:1979 Ga�': Pool : Bld SF:856 Ac :
* 38 *----------- -- - --- - g
. MetroSc«�/Washington . -------------..------ ------_*
Owner : IHLI PERRY Parcel :R1164�02
Si�e ; 11046 SW G�ENBURG RD TIGARD 97223 Xferd
I�tail : 128 S 38TF� ST OMAHA Iv'E 6$131 Prica : $49, 95p
Use : 191,2 RES, CONDpMINIL'MS Tot AV :$53 , 450
Lega1 :ASH CREEK PARK CONDOMINIUM, INT IN
: �QMMON ��,EMENT, BLCCK B, LQT I�8 Taxea : $739 , 95
Phone
Ccnsus :Tract 309 . 40 Elock 1 MapGrid: 655 D2 RefPar# :1S135CA 90Z28
Bedrm:2 Bth : 1 , 00 YB : 197� Gar: Pool : E1dgSF: 85G �,c :
* 39 *---- ---- ---- . MetroScan/Washington ------------------------- -*
�wner:BAi.DWIN RICK J Parcel :R1164581
Site : 11046 SW GREENBURG RD TIQARD 97223 Xterd
Mai� ; 13£�17 SW BQXELDER ST TIGARD CR 97��3 Pr.�c� : $49, 000
Use : 1912 RE9, C01V�OMINIUMS Tbt AV : $53, 450
Lega1 :A$H CREEK PARK CONDOMINIUM, INT IN
: COM,MpN ELEMENT, BLOCK 3, LOT �30 Taxes : $739 . 95
� Phone
Census :Tract 309 . 00 Block i MapGrid: 655 D2 RefPar# : iSZ35CA 90230
Bedz-zi:2 Hth: 1 . 00 YB: 1979 Gar: Pool : B1dgSF:856 Ac :
* 40 *- - - --------- ------ . M�troScan/Waehington . --- ----------------,-- ------*
;;wner;32CKFORD HELEN SUE Parcel :R1164787
��te : 11046 SW GREENBiTRG RD TIGARD 97223 Xferd
�?ail : 11046 SW Gr�EENgURG Rb #335 TIGARD OR 97223 Price ; $49, 95d
::se : 1912 ?2ES, CQNDQMINIT.TMS Tot AV : $5 3 , a 5 p
�,ega1 :ASH CREEK PARK CpNDOMINIUM, INT IN
:COMMON ELEM�:NT, BLOCK B, LOT 33:, Taxes : $739 , g5
� P�one
�e:sus :Tract 309 . 00 Block 1 MapGrid: E55 D2 RefPar# : 1S135CA 90335
�cdrm: 2 Bth: 1 . 00 YB :1979 Gar: Fool : B1dgSF: 856 Ac • -
The I:ltormatzorl Provided Is Deemed Reliable, But Is No� Guaranteed.
* 31 *- --- -- - -- - --- - - . MetraScan/Washington . -------------- ------ - -- -----*
Owner :WESTCOTT DAVID R Parcel :R1164714
Site : 11040 SW GREENBURG RD TIGA.�p 97223 Xferd
Mail : 5828 SW CHELTENHAM DR PORTLAND OR 972p1 P:ice : $17, 500
Use : 1912 RES, CONDOMYNIUMS Tot AV : $�2 , 520
Legal :r'�SH CREEK PARK COND4MINIUM, INT IN
:COMMON ELEMENT, BLOCK �, LOT 312 Tax2s :$588 . 62
• Phone .
Census :T�act 3d9 . OQ Black 1 MapGrid: 655 D2 RefPar## ; 1S135CA 9Q312
Bedrm: l Bth: 1. 00 YB: 1979 Gax: Pool : B1dgSF: 596 Ac :
� 32 *- - -- - - ------------ . MCtrdScan/Washington . -- --------------------------*
Owner:E & V DEV�LOPMENT CO Parcel :R0272957
Site : 11040 SW aREENBURG RD TIGARD 97223 Xferd
Mail : 13495 SW HENRY ST SEAVERT�N OR 97005 Frice .
U�e : 1Q02 VAC�►NT, RES2DENTIAL Tot AV : $9, 840
LegaJ. :ACRES . 4 9
• Tax�s : $135 . 67
= Phcne
Cansus :Tracti 309 . 00 Block 1 MapGrid: 655 D2 R�fPar# :ZS135CA 02800
Bedrm: Bth: YB : Gar: Pool : g1dgSF; �,� ; ,49
* 33 *- --- ------.. .._- . M�troscan/Washington . ----------------- --------- - -*
Owner: SMITH wINIFRED K Parcel :R116434b
Site : 11044 SW GREEh'�'BCTRG RD TIGARD 97223 Xferd .
Mail : 905 SW MAPLECREST DR PpRTLAND OR 97219 Frice ; $2�J, 000
Use : 1912 FcES, CONDOMINZUMS Tot AV : $4d, 1S0
Lega1 :ASI'. CREEK PARK CONDOMINIVM, IN'T IN
: CONII�fON ELEMENT, SLOC,I{ A, LOT 114 Taxes : $555 . 82
• Phone : 503-244-4372
Census :Tract 309 . 00 Block 1 MapGrid: 655 D2 RefPar# : 15135CA 90114
Bedrm: l Bth: ].. 40 YB:19?9 Gar: pool : H1dgSF:596 Ac:
} 34 }-- - ----- ------ ---- . MetroScan/Washington . ---------------------------*
Ownar:H�RBECK SALLY JEAIQ Parcel :R11,6475Q
Site : I1044 SW GREEN$URG RD TIGARD 97223 Xferd .
Mail : 1104� SW GREENBURG RD ##324 TIGARD OR 97223 Price : $28 , 500
Use : 1912 RES, CONDOMINIUMS Tot AV : C42, 520
Legal :ASH CREEK PARK CONDOMINZUM, IN'I' IN
:COMMON ELEMENT, BLOCK A, L�T 324 Taxes :$588 . 62
• Phone .
Censu� :Tract 309 . 00 Block 1 MapGr�d: 655 D2 RefPar## :1S135CA 90324
Bedrm: l Bth: 1 . 00 Yfl : 1979 Gar: Pool : B1dgSF: 595 AC :
* 35 *--------------�---- . MetroScan/Washir.gton . --------------- ---- - --------*
Owner:MULR�ONEY TIMOTFiY D Parcel :R11�4732
Site : :1044 SW GREENBURG RD TIGARD 97223 X�erd : O1/29/93
Mail : i1044 S'vV GREL�3URG RD #322 TIGARD OR 97223 Price : $34 , 0�0
UB� : �.912 RES, CONDOA'IINIUMS Tot AV : $�2 , 52Q
Lega1 :ASH CREEK PARIt CONDOMINIUM, INT TN
�C�NIIrION ELEMEI�'T, BLOCFC A, LC"� 3 2 Z Taxes : $5 S 8 . 6 2
• Phone .
Census :Trac� 309 . 00 B1ock 1 MaFGrid: 655 D2 R�fPar## : 1S135CA 90322
Bedrm: l 8th: 1 . 00 YB : 1979 Gar: Pool : S1dgSF: 596 Ac :
The Infarmation Provided Is Deemed Reliable, But Is Not Guaranteed.
*' 26 *---- ---- - -- -- - -- - - . r. roScan/Washington . -- - --- -- ------------- - --- -*
Cwner: CRAVER CYNTHIA LYN'N Aarcel :R1164322
�ite : 11040 SW GREEN$URG RD TIGARD 97223 xferd : 03/16/95
Mail : 11040 SW GREENBURG RD #104 TIGARD OR 97223 Price : $3Q, 000
Use : 1912 RES, CO�'DOMINIUMS Tot AV : $42 , 730
Lega1 :AS� CREEK PARK CONDOMINTUM, INT IN
:CCM?�iON ELErIENT, 3LOCK A, LGT 1O4 Taxes : $591 . 53
• Phone .
C�nsus :Tract 309 . 00 Block 1 MapGrid: 655 D2 RefPar# : 15135CA 901�4
Bedrm: l ath: i . 00 Y8 : 1979 Gar : Pool : B1dgSF: 596 Ac :
* 27 *-- ------ ---- - - -- - - . Me�.roScan/Washington . -------------------- -�-- -- --*
Ok�ner:DAV15 EUGENE L Parcel :R1164493
Site : 11040 SW GREENSURG RD TIGARD 97223 Xferd ,
Mail : 10875 SW 89TH A,,rE TIGAFtD OR 97223 Price : $Z3 , 650
Us� ; 1912 R�S, CQNDOMINIUMS Tot AV :$42, 520
Lega1 :ASH CREEK PARK CONDOMINIUM� I?JT IN
: COMM�N ELEMENT, BL4CK A, LOT 2d5 Taxes ; $588 . 62
• Phone : 503-Z46-5862
Census :Tract 309 . Q0 Block 1 MapGrid: 655 D2 RefPar# : 1S135CA 902�5
Bedrm: l Eth: 1 . 00 Y8 :1979 Gar: Poal : B1dgSF: 596 Ac :
* 28 *- ------- -- ---- - -- - . MetiroScan/Washington . ----------------- -- ------�- -*
Ow:Zer:R�,K�iLTN �MITRIY Parcel :R1164885
Site : 1�040 SW �REENSURG RD TIGA22D 97223 Xfard : 10/16/95
Mail : 1104Q SW GREEN3URG RD #3D9 TIGARD dR 97223 Price :$37, 500
Use : 1912 RES,CONDOMINIUMS TOt AV : $42 , 520
Legal :ASH CREEK pAR�{ CONDOMINICTM, INT IN .
:COMMON ELEMENT, B7,,OCK A, LOT 309 Taxes : $5$6 . 62
• Phane .
Cen�us :Trac� 309 . 00 Bl�ck Z MagGrid: 655 D2 RefPar#: 1S135CA, 90309
Bedrm: 7. �*h : i . aa Y$ ; 1979 Gar: Pool : B1dgSF: 596 Ac:
* 29 *---------- - --- --- - . MetroScan/Washington . ----�------------- -�--------*
Owr.er:ELLIOT RICH�Ft.D E Parcel :R1164313
Sit� : 11040 SW GREENBURG RD 'Z':GA.�tD 97223 Xferd .
Mail : 7.1040 SW GREENBURG RD #1Q3 TIGAPD OR 97223 Price :525. 893
Us� :1912 RES, CONDOMINTUMS Tot �AV ; $40, 150
LeQaI :ASH CREEK PARit CONDOMINIUM, IN'T �N
: COMI4i0N ELEMENT, BLOCK A, LOT 103 Taxas : $555 . 82
• Phone .
Census :Tract 309 . 00 Block Z MapGrid: 655 D2 RefPar#: 1S135CA 90103
Bedrm: l Bth: 1 . Q4 Y8 : 1979 Gar: PaoJ. : B1dgSF : 595 Ac :
* 30 *------ ----------- - . MetroScanJWashingtor. . ---��------ -------- - -- --- ---*
Owner:LENKrR RICHAP.� L & MARG��T P Parcel :R1154304
Site : 1'_040 SW GREENBURG R� TIGARD 97223 Xferd : 11/14/9E
Mail : 3980 SW 170T"ri AVE Ai:OriA OR 97G07 Price .
U92 : 1912 RES, CONDQMINIL'i�iS TCt AV : $40 � 150
Legal :Fi�ri CREEK PARx CONDGMINI[M, INT IN
:COMMON ELEM�N^', BLOCK A, LOT 10� Tax�s : �5�5 . �?2
. Phone .
Cer.su� :Tract 309 . 00 Eiock 1 MapGrid: 555 DZ RefPar� : �.S135CA 90i02
Bedrm: l Bth: 1 . 00 YB :1979 Gar: Pocl : B1dgSF : 596 Ac :
The Information Provided Is Deemed Reliable, �u� 1� Not Guaranteed.
* 21 *--- - -- ---- - --- -- - - : Met�oScan/waehington : --- --- -- - -- --- --- - - -- - -- - ---*
Owner:N!URr�.WSKI DANIEL J Parcel :R1164741
Site : *NO SITE A.DDRESS* Xferd : 12/08/95
Mail : 11044 SW GREENBURG RD #323 TZGARD OR 97223 Price : $35, 500
li9e : 1912 R�S, CONDQMYNIUMS �at AV : $42 , 520
Lcga� :ASH CREEK PARK COND�MINIUM, INT IN
: CONiMON ELEME?v'T, BLOCK A, LOT 3 2 3 Taxe s : $5 8 8 . 6 2
. Phone .
Census :Tract Block MapGrid: RefPar# : 1S135CA 90323
Bedrm: l Sth : 1. d0 YB : 1979 Gar: Pool : B1dgSF : 596 Ac:
* 22 *- - - -- - - ------ - -- -- : MetroScan/Washington : --- - - - --- ---- -- --- - ---------*
Owner:KOFFEL STEVEIV ALLEN Parcel :R1164778
Site : *NO SI'TE ADDRESS* Xferd .
i�ail : 2253 NE 154TH AVE PORTLAND OR 97230 Price :$25, 000
Use : 1912 R�S, CONDOMINIUMS Tot AV :$53 , 45Q
Lcga1 :A9H CREEK PARK CONDOMIIVIUM, INT IN
: C4MMON ELEM^NT, BLOCK B, LOT 334 Taxes : $739 . 95
. Phone .
Census :Tract Block MapGrid: RefPar# :1S135CA 90334
Bedrm: 2 Bth: 1 . 0� YB :1979 G�r: Fool : B1dgSF :856 Ac :
* 23 *-- - -- - - -- - -- -- ---- . MetroScan/Washington . ------------------ ----------*
�wner:K03AN GR2GORY & ALEXANDRA Parcel :R11648C3
Site : *N� SITE ADDRESS* Xferd : 09/12/95
Mail : 43�2 SW TERLYN CT FORTLAND OR 97221 Price : $52, OG0
TJse : 1912 RES, CONDOMINItJNIS Tct AV : $53,450
�egz�l :ASH CREEK PARK CONDOMINIUM, IiVT TN
: CO:KMON ELEMEIvTMT, BLOCR B, LOT 3 4 5 Taxes : $7 3 9 . 9 5
. Phone : 503-246-1274
Census :Tract Block MapGxzd: RetPar� : 1S135CA 90345
Bedrm: 2 Bth: 1 . 00 Y$ : �9?9 Gar: Pool : B1dgSF: 856 Ac :
* 24 *------ ------------ . MetraScan/Waehington . ----------------------------*
Owner:FOREIGN MIS$YON FOVNDATION Parcel :R17.G�849
Sit.e : �NQ SITE ADDRESS* Xferd : 10/20/94
Mail : 10875 Sw 89TH AVE TIGARD OR 97223 Price : $104
U�� : 191� AES,CONDOMINIUMS Tot AV :$42 , 52Q
LegaI :ASH CREEK P.ARK CONDOMINIUM, INT IN
: COMMON E�EMENT, BLOCK C, LOT 357 Taxes : $588 . 62
. Phane .
Census :Tract Block MapGrid: RefPar# : 1S135CA 90357
Bedrm: i Bth: 1 . 00 Y3: 19�9 Gar: Pool : B1dgSF: 596 Ac :
* 25 *- -- - --- - -- --- ----- . MetroScan/Wasr.ington . ----------------------------�
Owner:ASH JOLYNNE & P�LCOLM L Parcel :R].164867
Site : *NO SIT�, ADDRESS* Xferd : 06/13/94
Mail : 13032 MAPLELEAF CT N� AURORA OR 97002 Price : $41 , 5Cb
i7se : 1912 R�S, CONDOMT_NILi�S TCt AV : 542 , 520
Legal :ASH CREEK PARK CONDOMINIUM, INT IN
: COP�II�ION EL�MEn'?, B:,�CK C, LOT 359 Taxes : $588 . E2
. Phcne : 503 -678-2024
�ensus :Trac� Black MapGrid: RefPar# : 1S135CA. 90359
Bedrm: l Bth: 1 . 00 YB : 1979 Gar : Pool : S1dgSF : 596 Ac :
mhe xnformation Pravided Is Deemed Reliable, But Is Not Guaranteed.
. .
+ 16 � - - - ---- ------ - - - -- : MetroScarL/Washington : - --- - -- - -- --- --- -- - -- - - - - ---*
Owner : CRISW�LL CHR.4L�S D � PHYLLIS L Farcel :R116467d
Site : *NO SiT� ADDRESS* Xferd : 12/02/94
Mail : PO BOX 642 ESTACADA OR 97023 Price .
TJse : 1912 R�'S, CONDOMINIUMS Tot AV : $42 , 52Q
Legal �ASH GR�.EK PARK CONDOMINIUM, INT IN
: COMM�N ELEMENT, BLOCK C, LOT 255 Taxes : $588 . 62
. Phone .
Census :'rract B1ock MapGri.d: RefPar# : 1S135CA 90255
Bedrm: l Bth: 1 , 00 YB : 1979 Gar: Fool : B1dgSF:596 AC :
� 17 *- --- -------------- . MetroScan/Washington . ------__ _.... ..--....-- ----------*
Owner:FOREIGN MISSION FOUNDATION Parcel :R1164689
Si.te : *NO SITE ADDRESS* Xferd .
Mail : 1087� Sw $9TH AVE TIGARD OR 97223 Price .
Use : 1912 RES, CONDOMINI[T'+�IS Tot AV :$53 , 450
Lega1 :ASH CREEK PARK CONDCMINIUM, INT IN
:COMMON ELEMENT, BLOCK C, LOT 256 Taxes :$739 . 95
. Phone .
Census :Tract Block MapGrid: RefPar# : 1S135C�1 90256
5e3rm: 2 3th:Z . O� YE : 1975 Gar: P��1 : B1dgSF : 856 AC :
* 18 *- - ----- ------------ . MetroScan/Wa�hington . ---------- --------- ---------*
Ownar:GESM'� FA,'�IELA RUTH Pareel :R1164698
Site : �NO ST_TE A�DRESS* Xferd .
Mail :4021 N� 22I�D A�JE PORTLAND OR 97212 Pxice : $39, 950
Use : 1912 RES, CO.'�LOMINIUMS Tot AV : $42 , 52�
Lega1 :AS:�i CREEK PARK CONDOMINIUM, INT IN
:COI�++ION ELEME_�vT, BLQCK A, LOT 310 Taxes : $588 . 62
. Phorle .
Census :Tra�t Slock MapGrid: Refpar#:1S135CA 90�1Q
8�d1"m: 1 Bth: 1 . 00 Y8 : 19?9 Gar: Foal : B1dgSF: 596 .Ac :
* 19 *- - --- - ----- ------- . MetroScan/Washington . ----��___--------- - ---------*
Owner:'�1Ii,LI�,1�IS DOROTHY AI�7N Parcel :R1164705
Site : *NO S�T� ADLRESS* Xferd : OS/06/97.
Mail : 13336 S',�T CHELS�A LOOA TIGARD OR 97223 Frice .
Use � 1912 RES,CONDOMINIUi�IS To� AV : $42, 520
LEga1 :ASH CREEK PARiC CONLOM2NIUM, TNT IN
:COMMON ELEM�Iv'T, BLCCK A, L�T 311 Taxes : $588 .52
. Phone : 503 -620-6775
Census :Tract Block MapGrid: Re�Par# :1S135CA 90311
Be�rm: 1 Bth: 1 . 00 YB :1979 Gar: Pool : B1dgSr': 596 Ac :
* 20 *------------�- --- - . M°troScan/Washir.gton . - ---- --------- ------- --- ----*
Gwner:WAHL KIMBERLY ANN PayCel :R�164723
Site : *NO SITE ADDR�SS* Xfer3 : 04/06/89
Mail : 7054 SW LOCL.iST ST iIGARD OR 97223 P=i�e : 523 , 70Q
L'se : 1912 kES, CONDO�iIN7U'MS Tc� AV : $42, 520
Lega1 :�.SH CREEK PARit CONDOMZNIUM, INT IN
: �ONIlv!ON ELEMEVT', �L�CK A, LOT 3 21 Taxes : $5 8 8 . 52
. �hone .
Cen�uE :Tract Block MapGrid: RefPar# :1S135CA 90321
Bcdrm: l Bth: 1 . 00 YB : 1979 Gar: Poal : B1cigSF: 59E Ac :
The I^formation Provided zs Deemcd Re].iable, Bu* Is Not Guaranteed,
, � .
* �,1 *- - - -- - ---- --- -- --- . MetroScanjWashingtan . -- ------ --- --- ---- -- - - - --- --*
Owner :WESTCOTT DAVID R Parcel :R1164545
site : *Np $z�E ,�pDRESS* Xferd .
Mail : 5828 SW CHELTENHAM DR PORTLAND OR 97201 Price : $14 , 500
Use : 1912 RE$, CpNpQNizNIUMS Tot AV : $42 , 520
Lega1 :ASH CREEK PARK CONDOM2NIUM, INT YN
:COMMON ELEMENT, BLOCK A, LOT 21$ Taxes : $588 . 62
- Phone .
Census :Tract Block MapGrid: RefPar# : 1S135CA 90218
Bedrr.l: l Bth: i . aa YB : 1979 Gar: Pool : B1dgSF: 596 Ac :
* 12 *----- ------------ - . MetroScan/Wasr.ington . -------------- -------- -- -- - -*
Owner:STEELE JRMES D Parcel :R1164554
Site : *NG SITE ADDRESS* Xferd : 03/O1/95
Mail : 1745 SW FILMONT AVE PCRTLAND OR 97225 Price : $27, 500
Use : 2912 RES, CONbOMYNIUMS Tot AV : $42 , 520
Lega1 :ASH CREEK PARK CONDOMINIUM, INT IN
: COMMON ELEMENT, BLOCK A, LOT 21g Taxes : $58$ . 62
- Prone : 503-6?5-6721
Census :T=�ct Block MapGrid: RefPar# : 1S135C�i 90219
Bedrm: l Bth: 1 . 00 YB : 1979 Gar; Pool : B1dgSF:596 Ac :
* 13 *__,.--------------- . MetroScan/Washington . -___.._ ---------- ----- --- ---*
Owner :PETR.OSIAN ROBERT Parcel :R1164553
Site : *NO SITE ADL�RESS* X*_'erd : 06/27;95
Mail : 11044 Si� GREENBURG RD #220 TIGARD OR 97223 Price : $42, 500
Ue� : 1912 RES, CON'DQMINIUMS Tct AV :$42, 520
Lega1 :ASH CREEK PARK CONDOMINILTiyI, TNT IN
:COIyL�20N ELEMENT, SLOCK A, LOT 22Q Taxes : $589 . 62
• Phone : 503-968-8Q53
Census :Tract Block MapGrid: RefPar# : 1S135CA 90220
Bedrm: l Bth: 1 . 00 YB : 19'79 Gar: Pool : B1dgSF : 596 Ac :
* 14 �------------------ . MetroScan/Wasnington . -------------__ __ __________+
Owr.er:�OVSTEIN GENNADY & KIR.A �arcel :R1164572
Site : *NO SIT.� ADDR::SS* Xferd : 02/22/95
Mail : 14735 SW DAPHNE CT gEAVERTON OR 97007 Price :$42, 000
Use : 1912 RE�, CONDOMINIUMS Tot AV : $53 , 450
Legal :ASH CREEK PARK CONDOMIN2UM, INT IN
:CONIM�N ELEMENT, SLOCK B, LOT 229 Tax�S : $739 . 95
• Phone .
Census :TracL Block MapGrid: RefPar# : 1S135CA 9d229
Bedrm: 2 Bth: 1 . 00 Y8 : 1979 �ar: Pool : 31dg5F:$56 Ac :
* 15 *- --- - ---- -- --- -- -- : MEtraSca�./wa�!�ington : ----------- --- -- --- - -- - - ----*
Cw*.Zer :GRANuE GARY P & It�REN K Parcel :R1164616
Site : *�TO SITE A�DRE,SS* Xferd : 02;14/94
Maii : 11579 SE FALLBR�OR DR CLACK�MAS OR 97015 Price : $37, 196
Use _ �912 RES, CONDCMIN?UMS ToL AV : $53 , 720
Lega1 �ASH CREEK PAFcK CCNDOMINYJN, iNT IN
: CONiMON ELEMF'NT, BLOCK E, LOT 241. :Gxes : Y743 . 68
• P�cne : 5Q3-69$-5687
Cens�.s :Tract �lock MapGrid: RefPar# : 1S135CA 902 =1
Bedrn: 2 Bth: 1 . 04 � : 197�a Gar: Paol : B1dgSF: 856 Ac :
:;�e �nformation Provided Is Deemed Reliable, But Is Not Guarantee3.
� � ♦
II�TERFAITH O�JTItEACH SE�tVICES
RITE CENTER PROJECT
NEIGHBORHOOD MEETING
MARCH 26, 1997
7 Neighbors present
1 IOS Board Member
2 IOS staff
Architect for the project
(see attached sign-in sheet)
The meeting was opened at 7:OOPm by Kim Brown, IOS Executive Director who
described the conditional use permit process, the purpose of the neighborhood meeting
and the agenda for the meeting. Kim Brown did a brief history of IQS and the services
provided by the agency, bringing people up to the present with the shelter re-location.
Ms. Brown then talked about the programs at IOS, the pre-screening and intake process
for admittance into the shelter and answered questions regarding the day to day operation
of the shelter including hours of operation, staff to client ratio, and shelter rules and
regulations.
Sid Scott, project architect, presented visual aids to show the lot size, the proposed
building size and placement on the lot, parking requirements, use of the existing two story
house as shelter operations office space, and demolition and removal of the smaller one
story house. In addition, Mr. Scott talked about the Phasing of the project dependent
upon available funding.
The following concerns were expressed by neighbors:
* Noise level
* Effect on surrounding property values
* Potential for problems with people using the parking lot of the
condominiums for parking vehicles
* Appearance of the facility and landscape upkeep
* Signage
* People attending the meeting would like to contact additional neighbors
outside the required 250 feet to give project information and possibly hold
an additional meeting.
Conclusions:
* IOS will use residential grade materials for siding, roofing and windows
and neighbor friendly fencing within the State Offices to Families with
Children code for the playground area.
* Program participants staying at the shelter will be responsible for landscape
upkeep as a part of their contract with IOS.
. � .
--__ ---_- -_-_-.- ►��� �,�o� h oo d -M��-�-�n _--� z� - g� - -_-- -_-__
_ _ __ _ :� � ��� �n �
� _ _ _ _ _ ___ ___
__________ _ _ __ _ _____ __ __ ___ _ _ _____ _ ____ _
__ __� _ __ __ _ __ _ _ � �n�:�_ _
__._ C���4�� ,t�4��v�r��.�j�d�a�� _.___ ��_�?_�f_���_ ____
,� ��
---------- -- _-- - � �� ___ - - -- - -
-_ - - —- _- - -- -- --- -- --- --- - -
�'►[e �- K�►� m,,���-� jos� sw cdc,,,� s-� Ts4,�l oQ 9�aa3 57�-�ao�/?�!_y_��EE.- ---
-- ---- ----- -- -- - - __ .- - --- -- ----
----- ----
--- -- --- ��'' � �wr r`�f'�— _ l l��l�_��rc.e.�u�w ��3�7 -- (� 8?�=G�'Ce d--- --.
-------- --�uc� r��Ly.c�c t3t lo_�c�;_ �` �� G� - ------ �`��l�5�"?- -----
� ------
���c���Nh �V.�_?�Or_�3�5 _L�.�� �e��,c�_��Q �17��5 --��03�`��-C�K�_----
----------- - —� - - _ _ _ . _ -- -------------- - ----
�
-------- __-- -------
,� � `, - �� �
� ; _ �
------- _... . _. . -----._._------------ ---- ----------' --�-------=----
.., _- __ _ . _ -
�
..f . _. _ _ _ _. __ __- ---- ----------_._--------
�
r
Post-IY" �tinp request paC 7E64
ROUTlNG - REQUEST
Please
�READ Jo � �
❑ HANDLE �_.� ;�
❑ APPROVE ;
and
� FORWARD - ���� � �� ��
� RETURN /_/�� r�
❑ KEEP OR DISCARD C�7�_> 2 '�'� � ?�
❑ REVIEW WITH ME �� � � ��
Date �—�� From `��/
� CITYOFTIGARD
� � PR�-APPLICATION COHFERENCE NOTES s`��"����
' NON-RESIDENTIAL
.�� Z//3, �l7
STAFF: W l� ��A�✓DR F-�4
Ki� Brrowr�
APPIICANT: Kr-_�-tr-� Uae� / r�vTk�.cf��TN o�T�,�.� A6ENT:
Phone:[ il ZZ�S- 73sz Sg�s- oas4 Phoae: [ l
PROPERi`Y LOCATION:
ADDk'ESS: 1 I(��tC� �� /�/3�0 5 t�✓LtR�EEIvL3 J�Ct R1)
TN(MAP/TA1(LOT: /S! �SGA � z soo , z�oo
NECESSARYAPPUCAT101i[Sl: _ CoND/�T1dNAL �JSE , _f��'i�titiC� ��-=;,->� K :��,,ti%
_ ,Fx� �.itslx� /1' � �
,.
PROPOSAL DESCRIPTIOM: R/?� CENT�EI� �O C� 4�Ms'c I��S �ACt l•
COMPREHEMSIYE
PUIN Q;��16NAT10N: /1���/fJi'�1 Z�,EnlS/T�
—
IONIM6'�ESI6NAl10N: ��— ��
CITIZEN INVOLYEMEMT EAST FACILRATOR:
���: PHONE [5031
ZONIN6 DISTRICT DIMENSIOMAL REQUIREMENjS � ��'�`r�d�R� �sc
Minimum lot size:�Od�q. ft.'�� Average lot width: �" ft. Maximum building height: ��ft.
Setbacics Front�ft. Side,�ft. Rear ZO ft. Corner �' ft. from street.
Maximum site coverage: �% Minimum landscaped or natural vegetation area: ZC� %
[R�fer to Code Secdon 18.�_l
ADDIT10NA1 LOT DIMENS REQUIREMENi'S
Minimum lot ntage: 25 feet unless lot is created through the minor land partition process. Lots
created as part f a partition must have a minimum of 15 feet of frontage or have a minimum 15 foot
wide access ease ent.
The depth of all lots hall not exceed 2� times the average width, unless the parcel is less than 1�
times the minimum lot ' e of the applicable zoning district.
[R�f�r to Cod�Secdon 18.1 60-Lotsl
r.m oF nsa�o rre�aa�icad��C�mereoce Motes Pa�e 1 N i
��w.��..tl.�...p��tl..��..�..�...�...ts.�ti..
SPECIAI SETBACKS
� Streets: �0 feet from the centerline of �R E�tiSbVR��r .
� Established are\ � feet from
� ➢ Lower intensity zones. eet, atong the site's boundary.
�, ➢ Flag lot: 10-foot side yard s ack.
[R�ter to Code Sectlon and 18.96
SPECIAL BUILDIN6 NEI6NT PROVISIONS
Building Height Exce t�
Buildings located in a non-residential zone may be built to a height of 75 feet provided:
➢ A maximum building floor area to site area ratio (FAR) of 1.5 to 1 will exist;
➢ All actual building setbacks will be at least half('/z) of the building's height; and
➢ The structure will not abut a residential zone district.
[R�fer to Code Sectlon 18.98.OZ01
-_ _ --- ------
�ARIOM6 AND ACCESS�
Required parking for this type of use: ' lJ �' oaM v
Parking shown on preliminary plan(s): E
Secondary use required parking: ,v4
Parking shown on preliminary plan(s):
No more than 40°/a of required spaces may be designated and/or dimensioned as compact spaces.
Parking Stalls shall be dimensioned as follows:
➢ Standard par{cing space dimensions: 8 feet, 8 inches x 18 feet.
➢ Compact parking space dimensions: 8 feet x 15 feet.
[R�fer te Code Sectlao 18.106.0201
Handicapped Parking:
> All parking areas shall provide appropriately located and dimensioned disabled person parking spaces.
The minimum number of disabled person parking spaces to be provided, as well as the parking stall
dimensions, are mandated by the Americans with Disabilities Act (ADA). A handout is available upon
request. A handicapped parking space symbol shall be painted on the parking space surface and an
appropriate sign shall be posted.
Bicycle racks are required for multi-family, commercial and industrial developments. Bicycle racks shall be
located in areas protected from automobile traffic and in convenient locations. Bicycle parking spaces shall
be provided on the basis of one space for every fifteen (15) required vehicular parking spaces.
Minimum number of accesses: � Minimum access width: d
�
Minimum pavement width: 7�f
All driveways and parking areas, except for some fleet storage parking areas, must be paved.
Drive-in use queuing areas: /✓�
[Ref�r to Code Sec�on 18.106 and 18.1081
CIiY OF TI6ARD rre-Appticatleo Cante�ence Notes p�ge 2 N=
M/IHttil��tl�1��/IIatl�U►I�ulq�t/�rlantS�Ctla
AY REQUIREMENTS
V1�alkways shall extend from the ground floor entrances or from the ground floor landing of stairs, ramps, or
elevators of all commercial, institutional, and industrial uses, to the streets which provide the required
access and egress. Walkways shall provide convenient connections between buildings in multi-building
commercial, institutional, and industrial complexes. Unless impractical, walkways should be constructed
befinreen a new development and neighbo�ing developments.
� [ROf 0�t0 COdd SOCtlAq 18.108.0501
LOADINS AREA REQUI E!!TS
Every commerc 1 or industrial building in excess of 10,000 square feet shall be provided with a loading
space. The space 'ze and location shall be as approved by the City Engineer.
[Refer to Code Sec n 18.106.010-0901
CLEAR YISION AREA
e ity requires that clear vision areas be maintained between three and eight feet in height at
road/driveway, road/railroad, and road/road intersections. The size of the �equired clear vision area
depends upon the abutting street's functional classification.
[Reter to Code Sectlon 18.1021
BUfFERIN6 AND SCREEIIIM6
In order to increase privacy and to either reduce or efiminate adverse noise or visual impacts between
adjacent developments, especially between different land uses, the City requires landscaped buffer areas
along certain site perimeters. Required buffer areas are described by the Code in terms of width. Buffer
areas must be occupied by a mixture of deciduous and evergreen trees and shrubs and must also achieve
a balance between vertical and horizontal plantings. Site obscuring screens or fences may also be
required; these are often advisable even if not required by the Code. The required buffer areas may �
be occupied by vegetation, fences, utilities, and walkways. Additional information on required buffer area
materials and sizes may be found in the Development Code.
[Refer to Code Cdapter 18.100I
The required buffer widths which are applicable to your proposal area are as follows:
feet along north boundary. feet along east boundary.
feet along south boundary. feet along west boundary.
In addition, sight obscuring screening is required atong
DSCAPIM6
Street trees are required for all developments fronting on a public or private street as well as driveways
which are more than 100 feet in length. Street trees must be placed either within the public right-of-way or
on private property within six (6) feet of the right-of-way boundary. Street trees must have a minimum
caliper of at least two (2) inches when measured four (4) feet above grade. Street trees should be spaced
20 to 40 feet apart depending on the branching width of the proposed tree species at maturity. Further
information on regulations affecting street trees may be obtained from the Planning Division.
A minimum of one (1) tree for every seven (7) parking spaces must be planted in and around all parking
areas in order to provide a vegetative canopy effect. Landscaped parking areas shall include special
design features which effectively screen the paricing lot areas from view. These design features may
include the use of landscaped berms, decorative walls, and raised planters. For detailed information on
design requirements for parking areas and accesses.
IRefer to Code Chapt�rs 18.100,18.106 and 18.1081
cm eF nsasn �n-aaaaau.o c.merence N•ca P�Oe 3 N i
N�t-t•sl�.�tlal nN1atl.UM�u1n�•��rt�at a.ctl..
SI6NS
Sign permits must be obtained prior to installation of any sign in the City of Tigard. A "Guidelines for Sign
Permits" handout is available upon request. Additional sign area or height beyond Code standards may be
permitted if the sign proposal is reviewed as part of a development review application. Alternatively, a Sign
Code Exception application may be filed for review before the Hearings Officer.
� [Refer to Code Sectlon 18.1141
SENSITIVE DS
The de provides regulations for lands which are potentially unsuitable for development due to areas
within t 100-year floodplain, natural drainageways, wetland areas, on slopes in excess of 25 percent, or
on unsta e ground. Staff will attempt to preliminary identify sensitive lands areas at the pre-application
conference ased on available information. H�WEVER, the res on ibili to recisely ide ' SPns�t�ve
i
Chapter 18.84 also rovides regulations for the use, protection, or modification of sensitive lands areas.
i
[Reier b Code Sectlon 18. l
UNIfIED S RA6E A6ENCY NSA]BUFFER STANDARDS,R 8 0 96-44
Land d velopment adjacent to sensitive areas shall preserve and maintain or create a vegetated corridor
for a bu r wide enough to protect the water quality functioning of the sensitive area.
i
The vegetat d corridor shall be a minimum of 25 feet wide, measured horizontally, from the defined
boundaries o he sensitive area, except where approval has been granted by the Agency or City to reduce
the width of a p rtion of the corridor. If app�oval is granted by the Agency or City to reduce the width of a
portion of the ve etated corridor, then the surface water in this area shall be directed to an area of the
vegetated corridor hat is a minimum of 25 feet wide. The maximum allowable encroachment shall be 15
feet, except as allo d in Section 3.11.4. No more tha� 25 percent of the length of the vegetated corridor
within the developme t or project site can be less than 25 feet in width. In any case, the average width of
the vegetated corridor hall be a minimum of 25 feet.
i ' V i r:
No structures, developme t, construction activities, gardens, lawns, application of chemicals, dumping of
any materials of any kind, r other activities shall be permitted which otherwise detract from the water
quality protection provided b he vegetated corridor, except as allowed below:
� A gravel walkway or bike ath, not exceeding 8 feet in width. If the walkway or bike path is paved,
then the vegetated corridor ust be widened by the width to the path. A pa�ed or gravel walkway or
bike path may not be const ted closer than 10 feet from the boundary of the sensitive area, unless
approved by the Agency or C . Walkways and bike paths shall be constructed so as to minimize
disturbance to existing vegetatio ; and
> Water quality facilities may enc ach into the vegetated corridor a maximum of 10 feet with the
approval of the Agency or City.
cm oF nsaRO rre-Aaaucm�a C�derooce N�tes Paoe a a:
N�N-e.:ia.asi.noan•�tuw�ur.rd•n a.ea��
Location of Vegetated Corridor:
In any residential development which creates multiple parcels or lots intended for separate ownership, such
as a subdivision, the vegetated corridor shall be contained in a separate tract, and shall not be a part of any
parcel to be used for the construction of a dwelling unit.
[Reter to R s 0 96-44/USA Reguladoaa-Chapter 3,Oesign tor SWMI
TREE REMOVAL PLAM REQUIREMENT'S�
A tree pan for the planting, removal and protection of trees prepared by a certified arborist shall be provided
for any lot, parcel or combination of lots or parcels for which a development application for a subdivision,
major partition, site development review, planned development or conditional use is filed. Protection is
preferred over removal where possible.
The tree plan shall include the following:
➢ Identification of the location, size and species of all existing trees including trees designated as
significant by the City;
➢ Identification of a program to save existing trees or mitigate tree removal over 12 inches in caliper.
Mitigation must follow the replacement guidelines of Section 18.150.070.D. according to the
following standards:
b Retainage of less than 25 percent of existing trees over 12 inches in caliper requires a
mitigation program according to Section 18.150.070.D. of no net loss of trees;
a Retainage of from 25 to 50 percent of existing trees over 12 inches in caliper requires that
two-thirds of the trees to be removed be mitigated according to Section 18.150.070.D;
b Retainage of from 50 to 75 percent of existing trees over 12 inches in caliper requires that 50
percent of the trees to be removed be mitigated according to Section 18.150.070.D;
b Retainage of 75 percent or greater of existing trees over 12 inches in caliper requires no
mitigation;
➢ Identification of all trees which are proposed to be removed; and
➢ A protection program defining standards and methods that will be used by the applicant to protect
trees during and after construction.
Trees removed within the period of one (1) yea� prior to a development application listed above will be
inventoried as part of the tree plan above and will be replaced according to Section 18.150.070.D.
[Refer to Code S�cdon 18.150.0251
MR16AT10N
Replacement of a tree shall take place according to the foltowing guidelines:
> A �eplacement tree shall be a substantially similar species considering site characteristics.
➢ If a replacement tree of the species of the tree removed or damages is not reasonably available, the
Director may allow replacement with a different species of equivalent natural resource value.
7 If a replacement tree of the size cut is not reasonably available on the local market or would not be
viable, the Director shall require replacement with more than one tree in accordance with the
following formula:
� The number of replacement trees required shall be determined by dividing the estimated caliper size
of the tree removed or damaged, by the caliper size of the largest reasonably available replacement
trees. If this number of trees cannot be viably located on the subject property, the Director may
require one (1) or more replacement trees to be planted on other property within the city, either
public p�operty or, with the consent of the owner, private property.
cm oF nsiwa �re-�aoawn�a c•mereace Noc� Pape 5�t�
r�r-�.�r.�n.i.nnc.n.�nauu��.r��..cs.cn.■
➢ The planting of a replacement tree shall take place in a manner reasonably calculated to allow
� growth to maturity.
In lieu of tree replacement under Subsection D of this section, a party may, with the consent of the Director,
elect to compensate the City for its costs in performing such tree replacement.
� [Refer to Code Sectlon 18.150.0T0[Dl
Ran
The applicant shall submit a narrative which provides findings based on the applicable approval standards,
Failure to provide a narrative or adequately address criteria would be reason to consider an application
incomplete and delay review of the proposal.
[Refer te Code Sectlon 18.321
CODE SECTIONS
_ 18.80 _ 18.92 �8.100 � 18.108 �18.120 /18.150
_ 18.84 18.96 � 18.102 18.114 �18.130 18.160
_ 18.88 18.98 -�18.106 18.116 _ 18.134 18.162
./18.164
IMPACT STUOY
As a part of the application submittal requirements, applicants are required to include impact study
with their submittal package. The impact study shall quantify the effect of the development on
public facilities and services. The study shall address, at a minimum, the transportation system,
including bikeways, the drainage system, the parks system, the water system, the sewer system
and the noise impacts of the development. For each public facility system and type of impact, the
study shall propose improvements necessary to meet City standards, and to minimize the impact of
the development on the public at large, public facilities systems, and affected private property users.
In situations where the Community Development Code requires the dedication of real property
interests, the applicant shall either specifically concur with the dedication requirement, or provide
evidence which supports the conclusion that the real property dedication requirement is not roughly
proportional to the projected impacts of the development.
[Raf�r to Code Cdapter 18.32,Sectlon.0501
When a condition of app�oval requires transfer to the public of an interest in real property, the approval
authority shall adopt findings which support the conclusion that the interest in real property to be transferred
is roughly proportional to the impact the proposed development will have on the public.
[Refer to Code C6apter 18.32.Secdon.2501
E16HBORHOOD MEEi1M6
e app icant shall notify all property owners within 250 feet and the appropriate CIT Facilitator and the
members of any land use subcommittee(s) of their proposal. A minimum of 2 weeks between the mailing
date and the meeting date is required. Please review the Land Use Notification handout concerning site
posting and the meeting notice. M�eting is to be held �rior to submitting your a�plication or the a�plicatio�
will not be acce t�
[Ref�r to the Meighhomood Meetlng Nandoutl
BUILDIN6 PERMIT'S
Plans for building and other related permits will not be accepted for review until a land use approval has
been issued. Final inspection approvals by the Building Division will not be granted until there is
compliance with all conditions of development approval.
CRY OF TICARD lr�Applldtl�a C�dereo�e N�tes Page 6�t t
N�IHesl�ntl�l�/�Ileatl��/M�ui��/qut���t S�etln
REC
Applicant should contact franchise hauler for review and approval of site servicing compatibility with Pride
Disposal's vehicles. CONTACT PERSON: Lenny Hing with Pride Disposal at {503) 625-6177.
[Re1er to Coda Sectlon 18.116)
ADDRIONAL CONCERNS OR COMMENTS:
, G
,
���i� -(< ;�' - �i� � Tf�,/]_ "�c /� 1�f' 1 �;4/'L E
C../ v/lia�!/'�L����c ��'�iL.F-/� ��,[•=� �V/ /C l(�. `' ���• L' �,"l�"�'-:_�C �j.ti-�. � f-��.1�l �L �.`��,` f�L- A /�'/�
PROCEDURE
Administrative Staff Review.
✓ Public hearing before the Land Use Hearings Officer.
Public hearing before the Planning Commission.
Public hearing before the Planning Commission with the Commission making a recommendation
on the proposal to the City Council. An additional public hearing shall be held by the City
Council.
APPLICATIOM SUBMITTAL PROCE3'3'�
All applications must be accepted by a Planning Division staff member of the Community Development
Department at Tigard City Hall offices. PLEASE NOTE: A�olications submitted by mail or dro�ped
off at the counter without Planning Division acceptance may be returned. A�alications will NOT be
accepted after 3:00 P.M. on Fridays or 4:30 on other week days.
Maps submitted with an ap�lication shall be folded IN ADVANCE to 8.5 by 11 inches. One (1)•
8�" x 11" ma�� op sed Rroject should be submitted for attachment to the staff re ort or
administrative decision. AR�lication with unfolded maps shall not be acceRted•
The Planning Division and Engineering Division will perform a preliminary review of the application and will
determine whether an application is complete within 30 days of the counter submittal. Staff will notify the
applicant if additional information or additional copies of the submitted materials are required.
CRY OF TIGARD Pre-Ilpplicatl�o C��feronce M�tes Page 7 of i
M�IN�sILe�tl�l��OIIatl�U�l�nb/��prta��t Sutln
The administrative decision or public hearing will typically occur approximately 45 to 60 days after an
application is accepted as being complete by the Planning Division. Applications involving di�cult or
. protracted issues or requiring review by other jurisdictions may take additional time to review. Written
recommendations from the Planning staff are issued seven (7) days prior to the public hearing. A 10, to 20
day public appeal period follows all land use decisions. An appeal on this matter would be heard by the
� Tigard Ci�v rovNC.�'/ . A basic flow chart which illustrates the review process is
available from he Planning Division upon request.
This pre-application conference and the notes of the conference are intended to inform the prospective
applicant of the primary Community Development Code requirements applicable to the potential
development of a particular site and to allow the City staff and prospective applicant to discuss the
opportunities and constraints affecting development of the site.
PLEASE NOTE:
The conieroqca and notea cannot co�r all Code requlr�m�nts aad aspects of good site planning that
sdould apply to the deyelopmeat oI your site plan �ailuro of the staR to provide(nformatlon requirod
by the Cade sdall not constldrte a walu�r of the applicable staadaNs or r�qnir�ments. It is
r�commend�d that a prospective applicam aitli�r o6tafa and read the Commnniql Deyelopment Code
or aak any qnestloaa ef Ciq�staA rol�tl�e to Code r�quir�ments prior t�submittlng an applicadon.
An Additional pre-application fee and conference will be required if an application pertaining to thi�
pre-application conference is submitted after a period of more than six (6) months following this
conference (unless deemed as unnecessary by the Planning Division).
PREPARED BY: lilli/I 1J�/�JAJORc'�4
CITY OF T16ARD PLAMNIN6 DMSION
PHONE t5031639-4171
FNL• [5031684-7297
�:Uql�b�tal��sbnl�n��ts.�u
tEa�l���rl��S�etl����st�nlrn��Fe.u�1
5-F�r-97
cm oF nsu�n �re-�oaucan•a cemerooce Noms paoe:o�:
N/IH�sl�ntl�l�/IIIC�tl��/►I��dN��qtdl��tS�ttl��
1� I �� CA
� 2�v � Zc�co
�•.,,_;
- �
. City of Tigard, Oregon
� PRE-APPLICATION CONFERENCE NOTES
ENGINEERING SECTION
PUBLIC FACILITIES
The purpose of the pre-application conference is to:
(1.) Identify applicable Comprehensive Plan policies and ordinance provisions.
(2.) To provide City staff an opportunity to comment on specific concerns.
(3.) To review the Land Use Application review process with the applicant and to identify who the
final decision making authority shall be for the application.
The extent of necessary public improvements and dedications which shall be required of the applicant
will be recommended by City staff and subject to approval by the appropriate authority. There will be
no final recommendation to the decision making authority on behalf of the City staff until all concerned
commenting agencies, City staff and the public have had an opportunity to review and comment on
the application. The following comments are a ro' c ion of public improvement related requirements
that may be required as a condition of development approval for your proposed project.
Ri�ht-of-way dedication:
The City of Tigard requires that land area be dedicated to the public:
(1.) To increase abutting public rights-of-way to the ultimate functional street classification right-of-
way width as specified by the Community Development Code; or
(2.) For the creation of new streets.
Approval of a development application for this site will require right-of-way dedication for:
( ) to feet from centerline.
( ) to feet from centerline.
( ) to feet from centerline.
Street improvements:
(X) �'(iA�— street improvements will be necessary along �'����-c �.
( ) street improvements will be necessary along
(X) Street improvements on ��-(����,Q.0 shall include
, , underground placement of
utility wires (a fee may be collected if determined appropriate by the Engineering Department),
-- ---- ---�
� � „�„ � � �.
CITY OF TIGARD Pre•Application Conference Notes Page 1 of 5
Engineering Department Section
• ' , � � , �
, �
( ) Street improvements on shall include feet of pavement from
centerline, plus the installation of curb and gutters, storm sewers, underground placement of
�� utility wires (a fee may be collected if determined appropriate by the Engineering Department),
a five-foot wide sidewalk (sidewalks may be required to be wider on arterials or major collector
- streets, or in the Central Business District), necessary street signs and traffic control devices,
� streetlights, and a two year streetlighting fee.
(x) Section 18.164.120 of the TMC requires all overhead utility lines adjacent to a development
to be placed underground or, at the election of the developer, a fee in-lieu of undergrounding
can be paid. This requirement is valid even if the utility lines are on the opposite side of the
street from the site. If the fee in-lieu is proposed, it is equal to $ 27.50 per lineal foot of street
frontage that contains the overhead lines.
The,re are e ' ing overh utility lin� ich run � cent to t�is site alon W -
' rior , he lican sha�ithe pla the e
� utilities underground, or pay t e fee in-lieu described above. S T.�� MJS'(
�e�dL-� 1S 0N`�^� � s►.�la� S�-J�c.E. �,.��R�, Ta '�� S�cs7��.1y �-�c.�5€ C �
� �K Od2.4aR�-�-�f.� l-l�"� (���M�t—�
In some cases, where street improvements or other necessary public improvements are not currently
practical, the improvements may be deferred. In such cases, a condition of development approval
may be specified which requires the property owner(s) to execute a non-remonstrance agreement
which waives the property owner's right to remonstrate against the formation of a local improvement
district. The following street improvements may be eligible for such an agreement:
(1.)
�2.)
Pedestrianwaxs/bikewavs:
Sanitary Sewers:
The nearest sanitary sewer line to this property is a(n) g inch line which is located in
C�ik��,2c� `�� . The proposed development must be connected to a
public sanitary sewer. It is the developer's responsibility to�v�� �— �-✓�u� To
c..�ltil S o v� I F �S7( (��—S �41�� Cbr�JEt,T�.
CITY OF TIGARD Pre-Application Conference Notes Page 2 of 5
Engineering Department Section
� - Water Supalv:
1 —�. .� (�(�u.� �(c��—�
The ��� Water �- �hone:(503) ��( � � provides public water service in
the area of this site. The District should be contacted for information regarding water supply for your
proposed development.
Fire Protection:
Tualatin Valley Fire and Rescue District (Contact: Gene Birchill, (503) 526-2469) provides fire
protection services within the City of Tigard. The District should be contacted for information
regarding the adequacy of circulation systems, the need for fire hydrants, or other questions related to
fire protection.
Storm Sewer Improvements:
All proposed development within the City shall be designed such that storm water runoff is conveyed
to an approved public drainage system. The applicant will be required to submit a proposed storm
drainage plan for the site, and may be required to prepare a subbasin drainage analysis to ensure that
the proposed system will accommodate runoff from upstream properties when fully developed. A
downstream analysis will also likely be necessary to determine if runoff from the proposed
development will cause adverse impacts to the existing storm system downstream of the site.
� �c -r� �s A I S�` ��-�,c- 5-(a2ti( t.�� �nl �,�R�c,,� '� . -�-� �c�s sT�*�—�
��1/�� '� ,�° G�1� .
o .��/►0� 5 bR-�./� �y�l �.— ��/l�r�—
Other Comments:
All proposed sanitary sewer and storm drainage systems shall be designed such that City
maintenance vehicles will have unobstructed access to critical manholes in the systems. Maintenance
access roadways may be required if existing or proposed facilities are not otherwise readily
accessible.
• p� s'( -c� t-�-- �nl�- "(io.lA /uCG—S`� A�n.�A
l"�P� �►.! —r� �c�-�c_ �T Ca�.t� '�Ei�+�.l•
• ��� uxA--f.�t rs .4lARo�t R�Qc/� T f��x£ �
STORM WATER QUALITY
The City has agreed to enforce Surface Water Management (SWM) regulations established by the
Unified Sewerage Agency (USA) (Resolution and Order No. 91-47, as amended by R&O 91-75) which
requires the construction of on-site water quality facilities. The facilities shall be designed to remove
CITY OF TIGARD Pre-Application Conference Notes Page 3 of 5
Engineerirro Department Section
. - 65 percent of the phosph. � contained in 100 percent of thE �rm water runoff generated from
newly created impervious surfaces. The resolution contains a provision that would allow an applicant
.to pay a fee in-lieu of constructing an on-site facility provided specific criteria are met. The City will
use discretion in determining whether or not the fee in-lieu will be offered. If the fee is allowed, it will
be based upon the amount of new impervious surfaces created; for every 2,640 square feet, or
�po�tion thereof, the fee shall be $180.00. Preliminary sizing calculations for any proposed water
� quality facility shall be submitted with the development application. It is anticipated that this project will
�equire:
� (x) Construction of an on-site water quality facility.
( ) Payment of the fee in-lieu.
TRAFFIC IMPACT FEES
In 1990, Washington County adopted a county-wide Traffic Impact Fee (TIF} ordinance. The Traffic
Impact Fee program collects fees from new development based on the development's projected
impact upon the City's transportation system. The applicant shall be required to pay a fee based upon
the number of trips which are projected to result from the proposed development. The calculation of
the TIF is based on the proposed use of the land, the size of the project, and a general use based fee
category. The TIF shall be calculated at the time of building permit issuance. In limited
circumstances, payment of the TIF inay be allowed to be deferred until the issuance of an occupancy
permit. Deferral of the payment until occupancy is permissible o� when the TIF is greater than
$5,000.00.
�,�( � 'r� ,Ac-�-�-�tT F�— �r+c.Rso.�� �r� ��A�►.u� ��£.�) ��c� �5�.
PERMITS
Engineerinc�Department Permits:
Any work within a public right-of-way in the City of Tigard requires a permit from the Engineering
Department. There are two types of permits issued by Engineering, as follows:
Street Opening Permit (SOP). This permit covers relatively minor work in a public right-of-way
or easement, such as sidewalk and driveway installation or repair, and service connections to
main utility lines. This work may involve open trench work within the street. The permittee
must submit a plan of the proposed work for review and approval. The cost of this type of
permit is calculated as 4% of the cost of the work and is payable prior to issuance of the permit.
In addition, the permittee will be required to post a bond or similar financial security for the
work.
Compliance Agreement (CAP). This permit covers more extensive work such as main utility
line extensions, street improvements, etc. In subdivisions, this type of permit also covers all
grading and private utility work. Plans prepared by a registered professional engineer must be
submitted for review and approval. The cost of this permit is also calculated as 4% of the cost
of the improvements, based on the design engineer's estimate, and is payable prior to
issuance of the approved plan. The permittee will also be required to post a performance
bond, or other such suitable security, and exe�ute a Developer/Engineer Agreement which will
obligate the design engineer to perform the primary inspection of the public improvement
construction work.
Prior to City acceptance of any permitted work, and prior to release of work assurance bond(s),
the work shall be deemed complete and satisfactory by the City in writing. The permittee is
responsible for the work until such time written City acceptance of the work is posted.
CITY OF TIGARD Pre-Application Conference Notes Page 4 of 5
Engineering Oepartment Section
NOTE: If an Engineering Permit is required, the applicant must obtain that permit prior to
. release of any permits from the Building Department.
Building Department Permits:
The following is a brief overview of the type of permits issued by the Building Department. For a more
� detailed explanation of these permits, contact the Development Services Counter at 639-4171, ext.
304.
Site Improvement Permit (SIT). This permit is generally issued for all new commercial,
industrial and multi-family projects. This permit will also be required for land partitions where lot
grading and private utility work is required. This permit covers all on-site preparation, grading
and utility work. Home builders will also be required to obtain a SIT permit for grading work in
cases where the lot they are working on has slopes in excess of 20% and foundation
excavation material is not to be hauled from the site.
Building Permit (BUP). This permit covers onty the construction of the building and is issued
after, or concurrently with, the SIT permit.
Master Permit (MST). This permit is issued for all single and multi-family buildings. It covers all
work necessary for building construction, including sub-trades (excludes grading, etc.). This
permit can not be issued in a subdivision until the public improvements are substantially
complete and a mylar copy of the recorded plat has been returned by the applicant to the City.
For a land partition, the applicant must obtain an Engineering Permit, if required, and return a
mylar copy of the recorded plat to the City prior to issuance of this permit.
Other Permits. There are other special permits, such as mechanical, electrical and plumbing
that may also be required. Contact the Development Services Counter for more information.
GRADING PLAN REQUIREMENTS FOR SUBDIVISIONS
All subdivision projects shall require a proposed grading plan prepared by the design engineer. The
engineer will also be required to indicate which lots have natural slopes between 10% and 20%, as
well as lots that have natural slopes in excess of 20%. This information will be necessary in
determining if special grading inspections will be required when the lots develop. The design engineer
will also be required to shade all structural fill areas on the construction plans. In addition, each
homebuilder will be required to submit a specific site and floor plan for each lot. The site plan shall
include topographical contours and indicate the elevations of the corners of the lot. The builder shall
also indicate the proposed elevations at the four corners of the building.
PREPARED BY: � 2 �� ��
ENGINE�RING EPARTMENT
Phone: (503) 639-4171
Fax: (503) 684-7297
h:�login\pattylpreapp.eng
(Master section:preapp-r.mst)
December 23,1996
CITY OF TIGARD Pre•Application Conference Notes Page 5 of 5
Engineering Depanment Section
- - C1TY OF TIG�R�
CO��t;�,tUvITY DEVELOP,�,IE,VT DEP,�RT��1EvT
� ,-�PPLIC�TIO�V CHECKLIST
CRY OF TIOARD
The items on the checYlist below are required for the succesful completion of your
�application submission requirements. This checklist identifies what is required to
� be submitted with your application. This sheet MUST be returned and submitted
with all other applic�ble materials at the time you submit your land use application.
See your aqplic3tion for Further explanation of these items or call the City of Tigard
Planning Division at (503) 639-4171.
Staff: �✓Ill fli41�DRE�{ Date: Z ! �1?
.�PPLIGTiON 3� REL�TED OOCUI�IENT(S) SI;B��i1TT.�L REQI;IRE.��ENTS INCLU�E � M,�RKED ITE!�t5 �
A) Application form (1 copy) d
8) Owner's signature/written authorization �'
C� Titie transfer instrumendo� grant deed e-
D) Applicant's statement No. of Copies ��f
� Filin; Fee g /��e/�
SITE-SPECIFIC ,�tAP(SUPL�N(S) SUBMII?AL REQUIRE.�nENTS INCLUOE � nn.�RKED ITFtitS (
A) Site (ntormation showins: No. of Copies ���{
1. Vicinity map d'
2. Site size & dimensions r�
3. Contour lines (2 tt at 0-10°0 or 5 ft for grades > 10°0) d'
�. Drainage patterns, cour5es, and ponds ❑
�. Locations of natural hazard areas incfuding: ❑
(a) Floodplain areas o
(b) Slopes in excess oi 25°0 �
(c) Unstable �round �
(d) ,�reas with high seasonal water table ;�
(e) �reas with severe soil erosion potential ❑
(t� ,�reas having severely weak toundation soils ❑
6. Location oT resource areas as shown on che Comprenensive
��lap Inventorv includin�: �.
(a) Wildli�e habitats =
(b> 1rVedands ❑
7. Other site reatures:
(a) Rock outcroppings �
(b) Trees with 6" + caliper measured =� reet rrom ground leve! �
8. Location or existin; structures and their uses �
9. Location and rype of on and ori-site noise sources ,�'
10. Location or existing utilities and easements �
1 1 . Location o� existing dedicated ri;ht-o�-ways R''
L�.�.D LSc.♦PPLIUTIO;Y/LtST ?.�Gc ; Of 5
^ • B) Site Oevelooment Pla idic�tin�: �. of Copies .�Zy
t . Tn� proposed ��te snd �urrounding procert�es �
�. Contour line intervals d'
3. The location, dimensions and names or all:
(a) Existing 3� platted streets 3� other public ways and
easements on the �ite and on adjoinin� properties r�
� (b) Proposed streets or other public ways & easements
on the site Q
(c) .�Iternative routes or dead end or proposed streets
that require ruture extension p
-�. The location and dimension or:
(�) Entrances and exits on the site �
(b) Parking and circulation areas p�
(c) Loading and services area o
id) Pedestrian and bicycle circulation �
(e) Outdoor common areas ❑
(� Above ground utilities p�'
�. The location, dimensions & setback distances of all:
(�) Existing permanent structures, improvements, utilities, and
easements which are located on the site and on adjacent
property within 25 feet or the site �
(b) Proposed structures, imp�ovements, utilities and easements
on the site �
6. Storm draina;e facilities and analysis oi downstream conditions m�
�. Sanitary sewer facilities �
3. The location areas to be landscaped �'
9. The location and type of outdoor ligntino considering crime
prevention techniques �'
10. The location of maifboxes c
1 1. The Iocation o� all structures and their orientation m�
12. Existing or proposed sewer reimbursement agreements ❑
C� Gradin� Plan lndicatin�: No. of Copies �y
The site development p(an shall indude a ;radin; plan at the same scale
as the site analvsis drawin;s and sha(I contain the roflowin; inrormation:
1 . The location and extent to wnic� gradin; will take place indicatina:
(a) General contour lines o/'
(b) Siope ratios o
(c) Soil stabilization proposal(s; ❑
(d) ,�pproximate time o� year ror the propose� site development r�
2. ,� sta[ement trom a re�istered engineer supoorted by data �actual
substantiating:
(a) Subsurrace exploration and ;eotecnnical engineering reoort ❑
(b) The validity ot sanitary sewer and storm draina;e service proposals d
(c) Tnat al! problems will be miti;ated and how they �vill be miti;ated ❑
L�v�l.5"c.iP�::C1710N I LIST ?,1Gc=Of i
D) �rchitettural Dra�vir 'ndicstin�: �. o� Copies Z�
. • � The site developmeni .n proposai �hall inciude:
t . F!oor plan� indic3tin; ;he squ�re root�ge or all ;truc;ures
proposed ror use on-;ite
2. Typical elevation drawings or each structure
-� Landscaae Plan Indicztin�: No. of Copies Z1"'{
The landscape plan shall be drawn at the same scale o� the site
analvsis plan or a lar;er scale ir necessarv and shall indicate:
1 . Description or the irri;ation system where applicable ❑
�. Location and height of rences, burfers and screenings ar
3. Location or terraces, decks, �helters, play areas, and common open spaces o
-�. location, rype, size and species or existing and p�oposed plant materials d'
S. Landscape narrative whicn also addresses:
(a) Soil conditions ❑
(b) Erosion control measures chat wiil be used o
� Si�n Drawings: ❑
Si;n drawings shall be submitted in accordance with Chapter 18.11-�
o� the Code as part o� the Site Development Review or prior to obtaining
a Building Permit to construct a sign.
G) Tra�fic Generation Estimate: G
H) Preliminarv Partitionit Line Ad'ustment ��1a Indicatin : No. of Copies
1 . The ow�er of the su ject parce! ❑
2. The owner's authori agent �
3. The map scale (20,�0,100 or 200 �eet—1) inch north arrow and date ❑
�. Oescription of parcel I cation and boundaries ❑
�. Location, �vidth and na es o� streets, easements and other public
wavs within and adjace t to the parcel �
6. Location of all permanen buildings on and within 2� �eet o� all
propemr (ines ❑
i. Locaticn and width o� all ater courses ❑
8. Location or anv crees withi 6" or greater calioer at � reet above
;�ound level p
9. ,�II slopes ;reater than 25°a o
10. Location o� existing uti(ities a d utility easements ❑
� ; . For major land partition wnic creates a public street:
(a) The proposed ri;ht-o�-�va location and width ❑
(b) ,� scaled cross-section o� t e proposed street plus any reserve strip ❑
1 �. �ny applicable deed restric;ions o
i 3. Evidence that land partition �vill ot precfude erficient future land
divisio� where applicable =
'_�`�t7;,Sc >P�!:UTIOv/L'S� ?.+1Gc 3 CF 5
I) Subdivi.io� P Iimin. P1�t �t�p �nd Oata Indicatin�: ' 'o. of Copie�
, 1 . Sc31e equ ling ;0,�0, 100 ur �CQ reet ro �he incn ,�nd limited to on�
pha�z per eet �
?. Tne propos d n�me or the subdivision c
3. Vicinity ma showin; property's relationship to arterial �nd
- collector stre ts c
- -�. vames, addre-ses and teiephone numbers or che owner, developer,
. engineer, ;urv yer and designer (as applicabie) ❑
. �. Date o� applica ion o
6. Boundarv lines � tract to be subdivided ❑
;. ��i�mes or 3djace t suodivision or names or recorded owners or
adjoining parceis ot un-�ubdivided land ,�
3. Contour lines rela ed to a City-est�blished benchmark at ?-foot intervals
ror 0-10°� �rades reater chan 10°0 ❑
9. The purpose, locati n, type and size or all the rollowing (within and
adjacent to the pro sed subdivision):
(a) Public and pri te right-or-ways and easements ❑
(b) Public and priv e sanitary and storm sewer lines ❑
(c) Domestic water ains including fire hydrants ❑
(d) ,tilajor power tele hone transmission lines (SO,Q00 volts or greater) o
(e) �Vatercourses o
(t� Deed reservations r parks, open spaces, pathways and other
land encumbrances ❑
10. .approximate plan and pr riles of proposed sanitary and storm sewers
with ;rades and pipe size indicated on the plans ❑
1 1 . Plan o� the proposed wate distribution sy5tem, showing pipe sizes and
the location o� valves and �re hydrants ❑
12. ,�pproximate centerline pro iles showing the iinished grade or all streets
includin; street extensions r r a reasonable distance beyond the limits o�
the p�oposed subdivision c
13. Scaled cross sections o� prop ed street right-o�-way(s) o
1�. The location or all areas subj to inundation or storm water overflow ❑
1 S. Location, width & direction or low o� all water courses & drainage-ways e
16. The proposed iot con�i;uration approximate lot dimensions and
lot numbers. �Vhere lots are to e used ror purposes other than
residential, it shall be indicated po� sucn lots. c
1 ;. Tne location o� all tre�s with a c�i meter 6 incnes or greater measured at
� �eet above grouncf level, and th location o� pr000sed tree plantings �
18. The existin; uses o� the propem, cludin; the Iocation or al) structures
and the present us2s or the s;ructu s, and a s;atement or �vnich ;truc:ures
are to remain arter piattin; �
19. Supplemental inrormation inclucsin;.
(a) Proposed deed restrictions (if a y) �
(b) Proor of property ownership ❑
(c) � proposed plan �or provisio� o subdivision imorovements �
20. Exi�ting natural reatures includin; rcc!< out -oopinos, wetlands & mars� areas ❑
?1 . Ir any or the rore;oir; inrormation can ot practicably oe sho�vn on the
preliminary plat, it shall be inco�porate into a narrative and submitted
with the application _
L��O '�Sc�aP?L;U i:C.r I l;5� ?,aCc j CF i
)) Sol�r .�cce Csicul�tions: r
K) Other Informa 'on No. o� Copies o
h:'.O$�ntFdCti'mas:eR`J�cic;is;.�ss c
.�tav?3. 199i
?��v0 ;.Sc.t?P;!C�710r J�!5T ?.aGc� CF i
�
��
� McKeever/Morris, Inc.
722 S.W.Second Avenue
Suite 400
� Portland,Oregon 97204
fax 503 228-7365
" 503 228-7352
MEMORANDUM
TO: Tigard Planning Dep ent/
FROM: Keith Liden, AICP
RE: Pre-Application Conference
Interfaith Outreach Services-RTTE Center
DATE: January 30, 1997
PRE-APPLICATION CONFERENCE
On behalf of Interfaith Outreach Services I am requesting a pre-application conference for the RITE
Center which is described below. Please contact me at the number below to schedule this meeting.
It is our understanding that the Tigard City Council approved a waiver of the first $5,000 of
development review fees for this project. Therefore, the pre-application fee of$240 has not been
submitted.
PROPOSAL
Conditional use approval for a group residential facility. The RITE Center is proposed to be a 30-
bed facility for homeless families and individuals in East Washington County. The Center will
provide food,housing and self-sufficiency programs for persons working to break the cycle of
homelessness. It will operated by Interfaith Outreach Services, a private non-profit organization.
GENERAL INFORMATION
�vlicant
Keith Liden and Jim Rapp Kim Brown
McKeever/Morris, Inc. Interfaith Outreach
722 SW 2nd Avenue, Suite 400 P. O. Box 230821
Portland, OR 97204 Tigard, OR 97281
(503) 228-7352 (503) 598-0359
Fa1c (503) 228-7365
Owner
Jay Kirkman
17595 SW Bany Road
Beaverton, OR 97007
�
Pln�irrirtg
Design Interfai[h Ou[reach Preapplication
Puhlic l�iz�olverrierzt Page- 1
Projeet Managemerit
.
Location
. 11070 and 11130 SW Greenburg Road (Assessors Map No. 1 S 1 35 CA, Tax Lots 2500 and
, 2600).
. Comprehensive Plan Designation
Medium Density Residential
Zoning Designation
R-12, Residential, 12 units/acre
SUPPLEMENTAL MATERIALS
Two copies of a preliminary site plan, building elevations, and a tax assessor's map are attached.
kI.HD/ACT.doc 290
Preapp Tigazd
Interfaith Outreach Preapplication
Page-2
{_
ai�'i:,
�" :
\
L
s T21
�= 525.90
t ,
. :, �� /
�:: '° 2800
• `�' 35' v
. ;'+ 3�' 49 AC.-
:.�{-<, 0 34+Op,pp m
� n
. '�§N� '^ � —
VJ
��#��' 34+75.00 � 45� EA�EMENT
<-.r-: 30' SEE MAP
f'``' � �' 9H.SOy �' IS I 35CA
�
N N � ?56� � SUPPLEMENTAL
' ° �*� �' � MAP N0. I
. `n W 118.02 O�J
5' �
r � �ti�r (GS. 17,305) � `
� � (C.S. 5,645) _— ,�, �
� �jb, a��
4 p
� �� p�°b`9 r�
'�' 1TT.88 � � 26s 9$ �4� `LL
� _ � �'�
� � I
�6
� � ZJ�Q , `p\. �
SEE MAP N ./9AC ,�
IS I 35BC o�� .sg�9t8o �9�°
� I
_ I • �� � r
� c= o NA —
N �; / � I l��
I� .W.� W�"�-� � _
N o aJ� (GS. 14,295) � 1
I /�,� 10 <<� �
� � °�o• 1 X o6 0, ��
9
4*` �C.S. 14,415) `�e0y ���. 1 �� .,O��OJa�S` \ �Z��
= I O � O ` OF'Q G� r C� I
� �
7 .3 � \g\� a�� �o \ � �/' �C�� I I . S � 9H w
o z � 70Q /, � I �.1 � a 30
� H P. •g�,�c� �, b�S0UT�1 LINE J AVID C. GRAHiM
, 25 ..+.��T���
`.: KO►A aoi sT . .W �16� +� .
Oti�b S+�'C GOq,� m '�1 � �
_ • /, 6����� Q i�2 $ � �� / 1B8.90
�v5 \ ��,e� ° I
�0� `p..� /' $ `�o \g9�0
,?o� �\ .�O �2a2
(C.S. 6,I 6 3 ) \ 1.62 AC. I ,�EO �
�• / � o � I JPGP
�• �30 ,� �9
�
o,/
m ,T N B�R���55a8
� 16g•40 ?40 20 E' 8�� NO R�y� I,3� I
i K i.6o.ac. �„ ��G
� o f C.S. I8,940)
MAP / � N o
3�o.ao —.
' _�; 35C8 � / o ! — — — —
/ o
�,y� / �1 ' S B9°55' � �i.
pb% .� 106.S�0 I oq 40.9 B n ��,
g O p 45�� N � � 125.52
_� ( G.$. �1�987�/ e�a./?AC�26.50 �
�p �m �o ��� �+ 4600 i2oo
/ ao' 3ia c.
- iN N� SO.37�• .,�fP AC.
� / 900 � ,��, �~�r- � .
� � o�P�y�2219 S9AC. ; �p/F9% �r.�
6 a 6' '�
�t . / ���e6R � n 9� ` �2�3I c
� .03Ac. �
� �/ z� � ' �� �
�.. �'a, a`e� ��6Z �yp � 42
s� � � �e
/�\ �" ,, ��I I_
� .
v
m
m
� �
N
m
m :
�
� �? .
I` � ,i +
_ r
�
,. a. a ,..., �- . r .T . '
�� - � . � .
� - ` . .0 .�, i
b ��°s � ° v ." � , y
�, i �S , � '`, ` . .
o� ,�- '� �.✓ --�.
� �� �y L i:� � °+� "O��t
o " " � Q -� • �i .1-p���. _
� � .�• ;�� �
_<i � �,R ,` .. •-� ''� � -.
�i , .o-- ` � � � , -:� y �.r.',R� ' '��✓_" l- �•,
�� ,i •'� �f l" � ,_� " '
� ,��, `� -
—� � � �
� -' - $' � �
,�, .�, ------ - ;� �,�.'r ��
•�` � ��1��� � �. I I �,1 �fj_�
� � •��� � - ' � � �� � .'
+ i � I
r._. - , � -_ ' - �,� _ - _ _ — � -� - -
' � `. - - --� _ --- — _ _ - _� -
- ' _ ' � - .
, . .r � .... -• _ .
� +�♦ .�.
� �$� _ " _ � -� :
�
�
� -
r�� ,
�mcEs
��� -
�,�� iro�utti.ri.
�
Q���
�r.� R I T E C E N T E R .",.�.,���...�
`� �,.,�,..�.�.xw-a,
�w . . T t G A R D, O R E G p N '�'"'""'M"'
. .f,i�a u�s,r,.�
t
�
JAN-16-1997 8�48 FRO� TO 9228' - P.004/004
• R ~ �• " y ' - '
�^ � '
A
ir � �
. ;
. �
,_.�
; , ,� .
. _;, , .��
--�- �r�. . .
___ ^� f�i r,
.. _ ��_ \,��` ^ �,:- � �
\
O
�.r-:_. _ —_
� � �� b_,� __ _ .� - � �
� � � r�, , �
� � V _ .� , '
� r�-' �" ...�' _ �
� ,
� .� � ..
° �t: -� � �� �� -, .
o � -- � ��►. °'
A �
T
� . '
Z � ., • _ 1� . ' •
� `�• �
� � ---- . � � : ,
7v � . ' '/\ � - -'k.
� Z ,� _`�_ ,
.- .�' � ,
, � i 1' :�`� -
� � -_- .
� � �, �.. ..,L. �� ,4 .
�
� � � . � �w
�F �
/
. _ . '�\
�,�'�� 1 - �,�.
. �� ,
�
� ' .
���:
.
�,
��a; '
����
TOTAL P.004
JAN-16-1997 8�48 FROM TO 922873F� P.003i004
- � s
.
�� �� �
' iM Q
%r� E8
. ,l:
� + �. .
s ,'t ► � �
. - ►
�
i
.,% N - -
� - �� , ♦
� ' . . ',� r .
., �`- _ -
,f. ''.' .
'�:�" - ' .. - _ . . -.
� � d • a " � .+ � ` . ' • � . �:
� w� . .
. I + . " � - ,
� � � + _ _ `•Y.
� � r � M �
Z P
O ; ,' N .�,."�•.I• ' ' _�
• � � � • � , �,' ,I •
Q � rn � I V p , �• ' ••� :h' � .
n � N .� � � o ,• r- , '.,• .
O Z � � _ ,�,��'e .'; j � ..
Y - `�c ,4'
'�"� � .. ; �`
� - � � a
. ,
� b, ,• "�- 1 ��i ,r
' • ��
. ' � / � !
x
. _ '�� � •
� . . . ' N•• � + / �SeUP�i'iaN.CST����S�CPVi�GiF1���nMVO�NA�.,�.+.�
7
. �.,� ��� �� ��� � i� Q������� �
� , �� ���j� ���� �d„ A�
-� r � � ��� � �� � �
� :� � � �g �� � ������ � � �
. � , - � �
_ ,;, .. , , . r � �
-�, - ': , �
'� � . ,
� . -
�
���� .
��$� .
����
c�cP� �-����
r
(
� Rite Center Critical Path Schedule
o Pre-application required - previous expired - new standards in place
o August 20, 1996 - Notice of Neighborhood Meeting
o September 5, 1996 - Neighborhood Meeting
o September 9, 1996 - Application must be complete and accepted
o September 10, 1996 - Send out for comments
o September 15, 1996 - Full Site/Bldg. Plans for Plan Check must be submitted to
ensure completion
o September 23, 1996 - Property Owner Notice
o October 1, 1996 - Public Improvements Plans must be submitted to ensure
completion
o October 3, 1996 - Newspaper Ad published
o October 14, 1996 - Hearings Officer Hearing
o October 24, 1996 - Hearings Officer Final Order *******Notice of Final Order
would have to be mailed same day
o November 4, 1996 - Last Day to Appeal
o November 5, 1996 - Notice to Property Owners if Appealed
o November 14, 1996 - Newspaper Ad published
o November 26, 1996 - City Council Public Hearing and Final Order
i:\cu rpl n1d icklritecri.pth
08/22/96 12:23 PM
� ?L�7., ..'AI�'+ __--,. --�. .�. _ + .;+p,-1�+iP... '..�p,'M;M"""�►^iR'sqMr"_ -��{1p�!�., ►,:• . ,.,-.. ...�� • +�w;-rwq+ n-. — -
'��f -
CITY OF TIGARD
13125 S.W. Hall Blvd,
Tigard,Oregon 9:'223
� � !
�
�
� KIM BROWN
� � INTERFAITH OUTREACH SERYICES
� PO BOX 230821
� TIGARD OR 97281-0821
� , � �
�
I
-` �
J
CITY OF TI�ARD
13125 S.W. Hall B',vd,
. Tigard,Oregon 97223
�..� HAL HEWITT
' 9999 SW WILLSHIRE
f t'. � PORTLAND OR 97225
�
. - .
�p;�,l
:,�r: .
, i
REf., .�D PLANNING
��
�, McKeever/Morris, Inc. MAY 1 2 1997
722 S.W.Second Az>enue
Suite 40o CITYOFTIGARD
Portland,Oregon 97204
fax 503 228-7365
503 228-7352
May 5, 1997
Will D'Andrea
City of Tigard Planning
13125 SW Hall Blvd.
Tigard, OR 97223
RE: Conditional Use Permit Application (CUP 97-0006)
Interfaith Outreach Services (IOS) RITE Center
Dear Mr. D'Andrea:
McKeever/Morris, Inc. is acting as project manager for the captioned project and recently
submitted a conditional use permit application for same on behalf of IOS. As part of the
planning for the construction of the RITE Center, IOS has been encouraging the
community to come forward with donations of in-kind labor and materials. In order to
facilitate this participation, IOS may wish to separate portions of the project off from the
primary construction project. These elements would potentially be completed after the new
center is essentially complete and ready for occupancy. The following project elements are
being considered:
1. Site Landscaping
2. Perimeter Fencing
3. Parking Lot Surfacing
4. Outside Structures (such as the entry gazebo)
5. Interior Shelving and Finish Painting
6. Children's Playground
IOS has not made a final decision on any of these features. Matters are, of course,
completely dependent on the success of the several discussions that are underway regarding
donations. Some elements may, in the end, prove to lend themselves to completion within
the time frame of the new center construction. Nevertheless, in discussing this issue with
i?:cn B�wers�erff^vf j'C1ll?' of�:c�> !�� sag;ested that the concept be taken up as part of the
CUP process, and made a part of the approval. Please do not hesitate to give me a call to
discuss this further or if additional information is needed.
Sincerely,
� �'�''
`J" e H. Rapp
S �r Manager
cc: Kim Brown, IOS
Keith Liden, McKeever/Morris
�id Scott, Van Lom/Edwards
P�an,�����>
Design
Pithlic�Involz�ernent
Project Management
, �� RECEIVED PLANNING
McKeever/Morris, Inc. MAY 1 3 1997
` 722 S.W. Second Avenue �
Suite 400
Porfland,Oregon 97204 (',�N QF j��
fax 503 228-7365
503 228-7352
May 12, 1997
Will D'Andrea
City of Tigard Planning
13125 SW Hall Blvd.
Tigard, Oregon 97223
RE: Additional Information Requested on CUP 97-0006
Interfaith Outreach Services (I�OS) RITE Center
Dear Mr. D'Andrea:
Thank you for your letter of May 6, 1997 requesting additional information on four issues
raised by the CUP application for the IOS RITE Center. Our response follows, in the order
presented in your letter:
1. The existing residence to be retained on-site as IOS offices will be used "as-is" with
respect to floor plan and layout, except that full kitchen facilities may be removed and
replaced by equipment and furnishings more appropriate for an office activity. The Oregon
Remodelers Association is considering taking on the rehabilitation of the house as a
charitable project. Their activities will be confined to roof and foundation repairs, wiring
and plumbing, ADA improvements and the like. Jim Funk of the Tigard Building Division
has already met on site to discuss these plans. Additional "fixer-upper" tasks (painting,
cleaning, etc.) will be performed by volunteers.
The converted house will be used exclusively to provide office space for IOS staff charged
with the operation of the RITE Center, the associated on-site Self-Sufficiency Program,
and with IOS administrative activities necessary to support the Center. The Center is the
only activity undertaken by IOS, no other facilities or operations at other locations are
administered by IOS. The co-location of the new RITE Center and IOS offices on this site
is specifically intended to improve the overall efficiency of the organization, as currently
IOS offices and the existing center are on separate sites.
Seven IOS staff will be housed at the new site. Five of these staff will work out of the
converted home. IOS Executive Director Kim Brown prepared the attached staffing
summary in response to your request. Overall site design and improvements treat the
existing house and the new Center as a single functioning entity, albeit one that consists of
two detached building "units". Further discussion of the office function of the house is
contained on page 5 of CUP application 97-0006. There is no existing floor plan for this
existing house but as the layout will not be altered by the planned renovations such a plan is
perhaps unnecessary. We can, however, have our project architect prepare a sketch plan if
such information is still deemed relevant.
�
Ptann�ng
Desig n
Public Involaement
Project Management
_. ��� ' � �
'�
,�
,
a
�
2. The Child Development Center(CDC) is for the exclusive use of RITE Center residents.
Strictly speaking, the CDC is not even a conventional day caze, as the parents will reside
on-site. More information on the CDC is contained on page 4 of the program description
attached to our CUP application. No children from outside of the program have been or
will be admitted to RITE Center child development activities.
3. Existing trees on the site are identified and located on the topographic survey map
(Exhibit A-2) provided as part of the CUP application. Five deciduous trees are within the
yard of the existing larger house. The two smaller deciduous trees to the south of this
house will be removed for parking lot improvements. The remaining three trees measure
28", 26", and 70" DBH, and will be retained as noted on the topographic survey. One
coniferous tree is by the front of the smaller house. This coniferous tree will be removed
when the smaller home is demolished to make way for the new RITE Center. Most of the
trees shown on Exhibit A-2 are actually on adjacent properties.
4. The request is for the approval of both Phase 1 and Phase 2 of the RITE Center. The
two phases are summarized on the "major project elements" list contained on page 5 of our
CUP application and on attached maps. The 5000 square foot Phase 1 is scheduled to go
out to bid in July 1997, and commence construction in September. There are no firm plans
for Phase 2 construction, as considerable additional capital fundraising is necessary.
However, as there is some potential that two capital construction grants could be awarded
to IOS before the end of the year, and as these awards could permit an immediate move into
Phase 2 construction,both phases have been included in this CUP application.
Please do not hesitate to call me if any further clarification is required.
Sincerely,
ames Rapp
Senior Manager -
cc: Kim Brown, IOS
Keith Liden,McKeever/Morris
Sid Scott, Van Lom/Edwards
:�
� �
. '�
JpN 10 '00 08�05 P.02
Interfaith Outreac6 Services
• �R�T� �enter Staffing
The RITE Ceater facility wiU house office space for the following staf�
* Child and Family Services Coordinator
�` RITE Centcr Maaager(night Supervision at the Center)
The IOS Offices will house a#�ce space for the following staff
* Exe�utive Direcior
* Development Director
� Two(2) Self-Sufficiency Coordinators
* 4utreach S�rvices Specialist
* 5��,
Uil;1 I PI'F.C'I': 1�
June 25, 1997
Mr. Will D'Andrea, AICP
Community Development Department
City of Tigard
13125 SW Hall Blvd. RECF11lF�
Tigard, Oregon 97223
#.
Re: Revision to CUP 97-0006 ��N ; ;; ;c:i'i 7
Interfaith Outreach Services RITE Center COMMUNIIY utrrwrmt►Vi
Dear Will:
Please accept the attached drawings as a request to modify CUP 97-0006. The modifications
center around removal of the existing residence that was originally intended to be converted
into administration offices. As a result of the significant cost to renovate the house, we propose
to remove the house as part of the first phase and leave that portion of the site as landscape
area. This will remove the administrative offices from phase one.
In phase two, we propose to site a modular Administration Office building of approximately
1,500 square feet on the northwest corner of the site to provide administrative offices. In
addition, phase two will include 4 new parking spaces bringing the total parking on site to 14
spaces.
Please find enclosed seven each of the following drawings (dated 6-25-97):
Sheet A3 Phase 1 Site Plan This sheet has been revised to show the existing house
(item #7 on the Legend) dotted in and the house is
noted to be removed.
Sheet A3.1 Phase 2 Site Plan This is a new sheet and includes a new modular
Administration Office building located in the northwest
corner of the site and 4 new parking spaces have been
added.
Sheet A7 Phase 2 Floor Plan This sheet has been revised to include the new modular
Administration Office building of approximately 1,500
sf. shown on the upper left corner of the sheet.
-1rcl�itci•t,Van Lum I:dward..A1,1, l'l:
34 NW First,Suite 309 Yurtland,OR 97209
503226.0590 ,fisx 503273.8(v�9
,,
.��t
-_ ',i6
_ •
\KCIIfCEC7'5��:1� IA)A7 I�:U\1;�RllS
Mr. D'Andrea
June 25, 1997
page 2
Thank you for your consideration of the proposed modifications and if you have any questions,
please call. We look forward to the successful completion of the CUP.
Sincerely,
ARCHITECTS VAN LOM/EDWARDS AIA,PC
.
Sid L. Scott, AIA
_���C.v
2��
September 4, 1997 �
CITY OF TIGARD
OREGON
Greg Miller
Architects VanLom/Edwards
34 NW First#309
Portland, OR 97209
RE: Plans Check Number: 8-87C
This letter is to confirm receipt of your building plans which have been routed to the plans
examiner.
As a reminder, the associated land use case(s) is/are: CUP97-0006
Please be aware you are responsible for satisfying the conditions of the land use case(s)
and must submit plans directly to the appropriate staff person(s) indicated on your final
order.
Your build;��� Nlans ra e not routed to the planning or engineering departments; you must
satisfy the land use permit conditions independent of the building permit plans review
process.
After the building plans review process has been completed, your building permit will
not be issued without aRproval from the engineering and planning departments.
If you have any questions regarding this notice, please feel free to telephone me and I will
be happy to explain further.
Lv
Bonnie Mulhearn
Development Services Technician
cc: Building file
cc: Planning Department
cc: Engineering Department
I:\DSTS\BU PLUC.DOT
13125 SW Hall Blvd., Tigard, OR 97223 (503)639-4171 TDD (503) 684-2772
February 18, 1 ggg
,� ...
CITY OF TIGARD
Gregory L. Miller, Project Architect
Architects Van Lom Edwards OREGON
34 NW First, Suite 309
Po�tland, OR 97209
Re: Planning Division Outstanding Conditions of Approval for The Rite Center
(CUP 97-0006).
Dear Mr. Miller:
This letter is to inform you of the remaining Conditions of Approval related to Conditional
Use Permit (CUP) 97-0006, "The Rite Cente�' land use approval that pertain to the
Planning Division requirements. To date, the following conditions remain outstanding:
CONDITION #5:
Revised site and landscaping plans shall be submitted for review by the Pfanning
Division. Staff Contact: Will D'Andrea at 503-639-4171. The revised plans sha/l include
the following:
A• Landscaping incorporated into the berm that will effectively screen the parking lot
from view;
C. The caliper size of the trees to be removed. (f these trees are greater than 12-inch
caliper, provide mitigation measures in accordance with Section 18.150.025(B�(2);
and
D- Written solid waste hauler approval of facility location and equipment compatibility.
CONDITION #6:
Documentation that tax lots 02500 and 02600 have been consolidated. �,��5� c�-fGz S�-K�v.x•,'
CONDITION #7: �`��LPT1ON
Plans approved by Tualatin Valley Fire and Rescue (AGENCY CONTACT: Gene
Birchill).
The City is unable to issue building permits until these conditions are satisfied. These are
Planning Division conditions only, other City department(s) may have additional
conditions that need to be satisfied. For a complete list of outstanding conditions, please
contact a Development Services Technician at the City of Tigard at 503-639-4171, x304.
13125 SW Hall Blvd., Tigard, OR 97223 (503)639-4171 TDD (503) 684-2772
- _ -J
If you have any questions conceming the information in this letter, please feei free to
contact me at 503-039-4171 x315.
Sincerely,
���� ����
William D'Andrea
Associate Planner/AICP
i:�curpinlwil�cup97-Q6.con
c: CUP 97-0006 land use fife
1998 Planning correspondence file
2'�8/98 Letter to Gregory Miller, Architecis Van Lom Edwards Page 2 of 2
RE: The i�ite Center (CUP 97-0006) Outstanding Conditions
� Fe�-20-98 06 : 43A P _OI
� � RCHITECTURE
1010 hW Flanders. Suite 26J
Portland, Oregon 97209
Tel : 503 . 226 . 3617
Fax : 503 . 226 . 3715
Email : scott.arch�pi-e�press.com
� R A N 5 M I T T A L
, M E M O
TO: t � DATE: �- �� "L�
r
�� � 14B N0: �n�
�V
" w �� �
ATTN: �;li 'f��v�� r-��
RE: �� �-�A/I�
��r
- � � r � " t' ;
�ll - s�tl� i
-�.� �iwo I� l�a�rc {�e� �Qvnlol��r� _
� �
�a+�+�, -
BY: ��� VIA: �/ PAGES: 3
- r -_ �
l�
" Fe6-20-98 06 : 43A P _ 02
FEB-19-98 Qd:3/PM FROirFWASh}MG', �!�'ITY SD3-6B1-3908 T-0T2 P Q1/01 F-113
W ashington
County,
Oregon
Depat�nent of Asscssment and Taxation
Cartography ond Records Diviseon
1 SS Nonh First Avcnuc, Mail Stop#9
Hillsboro, Oregon 9712�
Telephone Number (503) 648-88�1
Fax Number (�03) 681-39U8
Date. 19 Fcbruary, 1998
From: Karla Brokaw
To� Sid Scon
Fax Number: 226-371�
This fax contains a total of ? pages includiug�his cover sheeT.
"�'o� fs �51�a�►.R -- 2� # �boD ha�r� f�ee�
1�--�- - Zl��
�oes r�oT -c��1
ME 1� ONE
"���c.�L�DEscr��3tro�
Y�/—_ "'.
?
• s�
e+ob-,��ti ��,�wsrO�� zt
� s� :3
• �a � � 4 -c- � - � ,
t �.i�'• . .. � ' � �e '
\ ` � � 1
' 1 '
.. \ ,
a .� * �- 't � •,ss �
N a. � � i � b 't2, �� r -
W `• � � ' • �`J e T� • [
i = ` \�i` �$ ��� t R � SI�i2
� ! \ \� ! __{ '�` , S
�
� k� �� �r� � 1 �4
� s � � �
� , ,� � �1.,� `� -t
,
� ,
� 'i � E# . '- .� '
� ,, , � ; �� �.
{{�1 , �'$ 2 �?�3�s�f°• 'f '� __ •► �` i� ���� #�it Z
1_ : ' �� n
1���'+� '1� �� r
� �- ,;� . �, � �
i3 ■� I - -..� - -
� ' . � 9 �
G ,
. � - ,p ����, � a
� Ri• �� �. t-t _ �t i�
� � �
•g , � • -- --. _ .. . .<_ ' � z
` r � ^
�� {r � �:� Z-��: R� � � � � �s a� s �
^i I � • � , 7 ' T� � �
r� ►�""" .� � �, .�.. D
� � - �� k� " `� � �
- r" 3e � �� s � •a R :� §�
�e ��e O� \\ 3
\
� �
a
_ . i�\
! _ i R� Rs• �' �� = \
! r . -
,, .� , !� .
' �8 Oec T C N E S ;A �J T� T �;� ; �� - �_ ,\
� } p � � Ry '� �
� �gE • s � : � != IE i� ~t i8 Y■ ��
• . #L�r � aR � � - � �' �� � i ta t- R- �
� �� � 0 r� J �� p z- � _ ? ��/ . r . � •�
Z� � �O ;
� o iF� �� �� �g _� �� � � � V /
� t � - . ... .... . __.. . --- � `�� -
, , •••• t � �: •�e �aYENtfE< <
�i��_ � �
`�
o�
�� �;�� .` � i�; ��� �
P � r __ � ��= a
�
' a �a� ��, ��� �
f�'S • S
Ett-� ZO/IO d Z10-1 BQ6E-lB9-E05 A1Nf�f 9N111SY�N-i�l� �Id9E�10 86•61-93�
£O - d b��� = 90 86-OZ-4?a� _
• •FEE-2�-19�8 ��4� FP,Of�1 TO 96647297 P.001%006
A RC:HITECT'S
C�T I�A 1V S M .1 T T ;1 T, U�'i F. N1 O Date 2/20/98 Jo�� �,�_ 9b65
T�: Ciry of Tigazd RP; Rite Center
Planning Department Planning Review Response
13125 SW Hall Boulevard PC�+: 8-86c
Tigard, Oregon 97223 SIT�: 97-0q83 �
ph_ (503) 639�171 BUP#: 97-0424
fax: (503) 684-7297 CUP: 97-0005
!�ttn: Will D'Andrea
Will,
This memo is to respond to the issues outlined in your letter, dated Febnaary 10, 1998, regarding the
Rite Center. Attached you will find a copy of this letter for reference.
Cnnditian�S
A. Per your conversation today with the Landscape Architect, Bruce Bieri, the laural hedge
shown on the drawing will affectively screen the parking lot.
B. 'I�vo trees over 12" caliper{28" &26"), will be removed. Based on Tigard Development
Code Requirements, two-thirds of 54" (28"+2b")must be mitigated, or 36" of tree caEiper.
Since [he existing 70" calipee tree will remain, we wil!mitigate the removal as foliaws:
2 AROG 6"C will remain 6" 4" {2 trees)* aC8"� �,�
5 �� 8 AROG 2"C will be changed to 4" 2°(8 trees)* �16" `�
I -�� 5 PC 2"C will remain 2" 2"(5 trees) 10"
1 PB 2"C will remain 2" 2"(1 tree) �"
,��R� 36"
��� �J.��� * Denotes sue deduction to account for street tree requirement in meeting che
� J�� � mitigation requirements.
L
�`-�
� �'��q The attached landscape plan clarifies where the changes to the trees will occur.
D. Attached you will �nd a revised trash enclosure plan. Lenning Hing, of Pride Disposal, has
writtea a merno regarding his acceptance of this design.
Condition#�6
A. I have been informed that this consolidation has aiready been campieted and recorded.
�k�'�AI\[��
Cond'►tion�7 A�7�1'N 10� �D��.1;
A. Gene Birchill was contacted and should have already reviewed the drawings_
�/ I trust that this response will adequately address your concerns. If you have any questians, please
��-� don't hesitate to call. ��_�
sTrll a'1� ��i�
�E�{4�+��'.
���P�Nv�� °'�
---.. .. ..__ __ _. _. _ ____ __.--- ---�----
� �j�;; Gregory L. Miller, Project Architect ��18: fax rOLRl Y3',!E8- 5
�� tC��N�1- -
ArrititFCts Van Iqm h:�Iw'rrd5.�A1�1, f'(:
i4 r1�L'F'irat,Suitc 311�1 Fi�rllan�i-(lli 9:'2(M)
503.�2fi.OS90 faz�03.`'i;i.8(r49
' �FEB-20-1998 B�46 FROM TO 96847297 P.002i008
February '!0, i 998
,a-f:�..1*
.
�
Gregory L. MiNer crt�r oF T����
Proje�t�rchiteci
Architects Van Lom Edwards OREGON
34 NW First, Suite 309
Po�tland, OR 97209
Re: Pianning Division Outstanding Conditions of Appro�al for The Rite Genter
Dear Mr_ Mifler.
This ietter is to snform you of the remaining conditions of approval re[ated to Conditional
Us� Permit {CUP) 97-0006, The Rite Center that pertain to the Planning Di�iSion. The
following conditions remain outstanding:
CQi1iD1TfON�#5:
Revised site and landscaping plans shall be submitted for review by the Pianning
Division, Sta€f Contact: Wrll D'Andrea, Planning DiviSior� �t 5Q3-fi39�171. The revised
plans shall include the following:
A. landscaping to be incorporated into the berm that will effectively screen the parking
lof from view;
C. caliper size of the trees to be removed. If these trees are greater than 12-inch
caliper, the appficanf shall provide mitiga6on in accordance with Section
�8.l�a.o�stB)(2),
D. written solid waste hauler approval of faci(i#y locat�on and equipment compatibility. r
CONDITION�s: �
DocumertEation that tax lots 02500 and 02604 have been consolidated.
CONDITlON #7:
Plans approved by Tualatin Val(ey Fire and Rescue (AGENCY CONTACT: Gene
Birchill}.
The Cify is unable to issus building permits until these conditions are satisfied. These are
Planning Di�ision conditians oniy, oth�t Department(s} conditions may aiso need to be
satisfied. For a complete list of outstanding condit+ons, please contact a Developme�t
Services Technician at the City o�Tigard at 503-639�171. x304.
If you �ave any questions concerning the information in thzs letter, p{ease feel free to
con#act me at 503-639�171 x3��.
11/26/97 Lette�to James Andrews, Nicali Engineering Page 1 of 2
i 3125 S1�'�ic�f�l�l.C���h��7��Q��p���� ���j 684-2772
• ,FEB—��-1998 e�46 FROM TO 96E4?297 P.E���: ��F
�
� � � � *
R1
�
�
DISPOSAL COMPA�IY
P.O. Box 8Z0 Shervuood, OR �7140 (SQ3)625-6i77
TE�.�PFtON�: (sn3) �25-bl�7 F�x D (SQ3) b25-bl��
r�ax c,�v�tc si�E�•r
hATE: .Z -- � � — �S� .
TD: V. v� a r � � i i ��—
. �' .`_..� ,---
TH1.Bk'N(lN�t
g� N�rih��:---2� 3 � 86�g . . ._. �
�"r•[��,N�r 1�N:
FR�lS:__�.,�`.Q%1.',ti... d
� �,. ..._.. _, _
WB ARE S�NRI21C � t'At:l:S (7NCI.UI�INC 'PIITS PAC�+} . IF Y[]if t2q NOT
R�CEXVft A1,I, OF TIIESE 1'J1[;�:5. I'I.I:ASt� (:Ai.1. ll� AS 50nN A QOSSI��,E.
t 'I'IIANK Yc)III �
� � �t-��,�g w�.� C�}: �( {71��' f�r a'� �� o Sa�
�P
� � �� �`� �� ��' C�,S�-v��-,�� � s��w � .
�
� ��
°`"�,t
�-�.�,, l�F�t
r
� �
';�� �>ri���d�i�,� �nnyo recyclad potper.
• ,FEB-2�1-19g8 ��45 FROM TO 9FB4?29" F'.E��4��t�8
�•, �,- "` -�r1'�'3.. .
�.�2 s T� : ,�_C'7 n,r r, n,� n
--- - . n��.> 2/2�/98
..� f�,_ i�?���:. 9665
—�`
Febr�ary T 0, �998
Gtegory�- Mifler
Pro1�ct Architect
Ar�hitects 1/an Lom Edw �;��
34 NW Firsr, Surte 309 ards Q� ,��7�
Portlan�, oR g72as
oRE�oN
Re: Planning pj��sian O�t�ta�din
Dear � Conditio�s of AAproval for The Rite
Mr_ Mi11er Center
Th'S letter rs to rnform
llse Pe�it {CUP You of the temain�n
fo1lowrn9 �onditrons9�-�QD6, 7he R�� 9 �nditions of
Center ih�t aPP�ovaf related fo Cond�tional
main oUts�a�diRg; Pertair� to the P1an
C� 1TlQN � ning Divisiorr. The
Revised site and landsca rn
Division, Staff �ontacf: p 9 )ans
V1r11 p shall be sub
Plans shall rncl�,de the follo�,;^9ARdre�, p�annin m��ed for reYje�, b
9 Divisian at 503,fi39�17Y the P(annir�g
a• landscapin � The revtsed
!Qt from view;t� be lncorporated into the be
� �a#wi11 effective►y screen the pa�kin
C ��l�per s�Z� of the �
caliper, the trees to be r
18_?5p. � apAlicant shalJ emoved. If these tr�s
02�{6)(2); Arovide mitigafion in acco danreater than 12-inch
D. �� w�h Section
w�tten solid waste hau(er apprava!of f��-.
C� D1TlO �f j�'��cation and eq�;
Documentation�hat tax 10 pment com
Aatibility. r
ts 025fl0 and p2600 have b�en cons '
CONDITIDN #7: o�idated.
plans approved �
Birchrl!). y TUafatin Va1t�Y F,re and
Rescu� {qGENCY CpNTaCT; G
The City is unable to rssue buildin ene
Planning p�vision � P��n�ts unti�theSe condition
S��S f�d condrtrons only, other De
For a compJete list of o�tstaRdi�����nt _ S �� satisfied, 7'hese ar�
Services Technician at tr,o �;�. __. tsJ cond;tions
. mav �,�., __ .
..... ..��y vr �i - --• .,,���,��s, plea , �,�� ,��eo to be
�ab at 503-63g-4 , �e contact a pevefopment
- . 1f you have an 171 x3
contact m Y ���stions .
e at S03- �ernrRg f�e infoRnation in
639-4171 ,�,���.
11l26/9? Letter tb JameS this letter, p�Qase feel �ree to
I312�$����C�j h Andrews. NjCOIi E�giRegri�g
� ��- ����Q��p���
���68d-2772 Aa9e 1 of 2
• . FEE-�L-1��r�8 B:4^ FP.OP•1 Ti i ��r�F,.�r,'�'�^ F�.E���S Eu=t��
.
. , . 1�
� � ��T
��
.
�
. '
. , ".
. ,
. � .
��w
�
P � � � ��
� � �
QtsPoSn� COMPAHY
p,p. SoY 82o Shetwoocl, OR 97140 t503)625-&177
T�L�PKOKB; (5i33) 6'l5�h1�7 FAx Q (503) 625-S179
N�Ax GnV�.it S11EE'C
n��c�: � — � g — g�'_ -
T�: �r o,� ,_Yy1�l f ��
T81.k!'!i(1t�8:^ •---•---• . _._ . . _..._ _�.__�-._— -
FAX NAMISElt:____-_�`Z � ^ �f?�� _ . .._._ ...__.__..__. -
AT'!'h:N'1''[t1N:_ ...___-.. , . -- - -... .-----�----�- -
�K�M:..___._-.�--�- � J � _ _ _.__ _.
. '�'"`�
� .. . .---. ......... •�.�„o u..•v� 7F vntt 1)n NOT
�
WE A[lE SEN�lIt�1C � l'AUt:s tlw�.i.in����. .�.... ........ . -- - -
_ � RECEiv� �t.1. Or t'11�SE ti'��:�5, t��_t���L•' c:At.t. us pS SOCSN [► PC651ilLE.
�f'�t,+NK Yc�t�t � �?� �/N S�
�
� � lr��,��s vti--e, w: t� m�-�-�- (� a sa.
-� �..�.�s `� ��5�,.,,�'�'Q� �s ���w � -
��� s� � � .
� �°.�
°�
�� ��
� y
1
r
•'f" 1'rlrrlsrel..n 1n0?'.rocyrledPoppr,
i '
• . FEB-20-1998 6�47 FROM TO 96647297 P.BEir �=u=��.
�--J �;
i��4��� �� �� t¢�� �� t 1 � ''
_,�..-_
s� ��� � �
..,.. N ;
� `` �, 5 ' � � �
;� ..Y � f -'�''
��� 'j �.� � : '�+.� .'�" ,��1�
■ �l1�y'''� •�,t„~l 1 �`O �Y .,� �{,.
� w., _ .:._. '�
`;l..�." bh� �+�.i
� fN �; � �.>l A3� _�. �r
{ ,��„''y�., S`��%'� , �' �"'� .
��< i ��+ --��"
� �- �:. � �� __�,�...--- , .
1 � % .]r,�, �:J � �''
► ` : P:-' F �
��� y .s � `� �s.
;�� �- ��..� � � F 1' � � � i � � � � ���
�� C. ' t �" ��� � � � '� � � p ��
� - ' _ -- � '�� � �� �E� � � � �€ � � 9 � d
`� -- - �- " � • � t �� �� � � � i' � � � � �
� • I r I �
" 4� '; , �� �� �� �t� � � �� �� � � 1 � ��
�. , +,.; ;�
� �,.,r ' � O O O O O�O O Om000
[� � '� :..;::.1;���.` � � •
� p '� ^��a ',,� ���� ��
Y6 ,� ; 1 �� � ��
��` � � $�ti ��t�
_ � �
.� � ,
.,, ` �; � � �6�
• ,;....�� +, '
,
` � �.. . � �
::�::`� � = 1 � .
�-:. � E _ � �
-- - , �
�:: - �, ,� � '' '': V �E �
.. ��'%'� - f'°�`. t � � � ��
' _ ��--.. � - •'`� ��� i� _ V 4������
. . � `.�'�.;� � � �, �r ,��-^i" � ������
� 1 �:�'�• � � '.�'� w:<..:, � y�
' :.�-� � � .�..- '� � 1
. , �
� . , �`s,: ',�; � a �
' ''=.. _ ; i„"°, ', � � ¢ � �''� . �
�^ ` `';�, �. `��:-�; '? � '^ �
'�.,.s.,�,` .� �•
w .�� Y x '`r 4 � ,� �,r! � '"*' "tt'• ��� � �� �
�.�� L ~< � 4J" ' } ; ;° '�� .^i;' ,�� �Ir, � �
���'A'!�" �•' /� �1I� �y )`�! �:;''.�. '�;t��'�� ' ' ' 1 �.l,'^. �
..«.fb1.ld � i� �l 11..:'r`:.,`�, . ,4:. -- '— . i ' �r
� ��1 � Z' a.,r r— • '�r
:+L � �. i
1 , �` .. . �' ,� , �
r— � �; � � `,ti�=.
� .y�: � '�i� ��'}y�' � � � �
� > .,(°i!'+� �o• 7� , - � .7'.` ��� i� f ..
'. 'l,, f. ';�_. ,��. .�'. 7j.�,� • ,...�.!��t�• f� i
1 � •`N'�!� � • .�'� !Y tfI. ` �
1 "i i ',Ji:' �S� r
{ e; � � } + �_� �
1
€ ��� . � �
� � � � x � � ,�1.
� s � � r
t . ?
o L�r�� _+J .=«. r ,`, .
, .
N
't�
1 �
� rtl �t -
� � .n� ��4 '�'
N�
�,
,,f�` � -�' �
`� �r, ; �', r..
�• . ' ' r + �
�� J- � ,
� '_
J �� ' _��f ��
a ��
1 �
� � � ! _�_
�o �o R r �� .�
� ��s�
. FEB-2�-1998 8=4E FROM T�_� QFjE'�"�q" P.f��;-Or�g
�
P * * * *
R
t
�
E
bISPOSAI. COMPANY
R,O. Sax 820 Shen�vood. Oq 97l40 (5Q3y825-6l77
TEi.EPHONE: (SQ3} fi25-b�77 FAX � {�p3) 625-6179
r'Ax cov�.tt st���'r .
nAT�; �Z -- � � — �g'
T(): �lr Cl�Y" J'+'t r' [! �� .
�.�`- ---
TE1.�Ptlf�N$:
FAx xAMti�K:�__��3 ., S6t�c� . _ .`---.. --.-
A7��C�N�r 1 nN: --- ---
BRAH:_----�.j��y1.... , � . -•--•
� �' —, �
WS ARE SENnINc � l'Al:ItY (�J JiCl.lil)�NC 'P(liS PAL'�►) . iF Yf1t1 qp IIAT
RBCEtVE 111.1. Of f�lleS� l'Al:l:S. 1'I.L•'A5� (:AI.I. llb AS SOt1N A POSSIHLE.
J � 'i'ItANt� Yc)ttt r
� � �Zl-�f.Cs crh•� W i (,� h'I�.T f�ri��� �r�5 P o Sa�1
� � s� �,.,,�- �.� �� e�.S��`�-�� � s��w � _
�
� �
� �
��� .���
� y '�
�;�,�,i� }+rfnled on IflO�'s roc�clsd no�per.
. , � FEB-2�-1998 S:�g FROf•1 TO GCB4?29� P.��8.%G�S
.
. � �
w�
. �
�
'� .
. �
, � . � .
� f
� � � �•
.. _ � ♦
�'
�
� � +� �
O � � .
• • �
• �
• • • ,
s�� �
� S�
s
t
��' � �
/�'O
Y
, ��
�/
� ��s R0�'�
Feb-25-98 12 : 05P P _O1
� � RCHITEC � URE
1010 NW Flanders, Suite 204
Portland, Oregon 97209
Tel : 503 . 226 . 3611
Fax : 503 . 22fi . 3115
Email : scott.arch�pi•eipress.com
, FAX TRANSI�IITTAL
Date: February 25, 1998 2 Pages 1'otal
To: City of Tigard
Planning Department
Attn.: Will D'Andrea
fax!! (503) 684-7297
From: Sid Scot���
Job: RITE Center
Re: Response to Condition#5 Regarding Tree Mitigation
1 Landscape plan with 5 additional 2" caliper PC trees located at the
north and east side of che project.
Will;
Per our discussion, I have added 10" of tree caliper to conf�rm with the tree
mitigation requirements. Please call if you have any additional questions.
Thanks.
�a�xn au�a o�r�►i. i � • - �' �-T-�.��
y�•.Y� WM • �I Wsr� � (I�Ml�fiW�lOA/� T
.. �� J�S � . 11
� �
.` - ' � ' , ,�
' ' : �I
� S DT1� � r , ,.......... ' �a :V
I � 95.EE � ry :il;:ir'!�`�iii�iiiiii�ii�:� � m.ac+.s .y� Q1
1 �a, E....,I�iarr:•::::'cc:: ��wr.a.w �rw �
� •! 2� -� �
..�• +, `.i�iJ�.i.�.i::::::4iiii:i;:
, ...,- . '
/ ,..... ::: ., ; -
, . ��G r���_--- ..• � O�D
1 °°�
� ,....:, b.�
�
' ' f�'�l�F EKP1�1'�.r7�01'� � S g' _ � w..r� �wi.w � r.rr ry^r '.�~° N
i ►I �B I ����J,.(' � ��
�M�M '� I '�i�, ��s O
ro w � ..�. °�:��• ..<"' ',: �. �.r �
� • >.
� - ..',' �` 1 ' : rw V! , i , 'j}.,,...:4� �
n..�eu i . .. : �;e,.:;,.,
�nwa / �..�...�..������ � ..�. •� � ),. . , •.�... ' ''�` � �;`:
y .-0 w H�.t.\ �`. C � �
�_ ~�\ ' x � j �{ ' �6�3� � .�. ��. <<.
,- ' ���: }� � 3, �• �j . __� t'a
OwI1r . . .S. :�%;' [ � '. i y ••b ,\l ti'`'.�t
AR ,:�iy: �.J:. 1♦ w •r �... '� � .
.-C'"i- �'u �i�GV 7i� � _ '_ 1�, �\ ),' <
1.� ' � ',, �
`• �,ro. ,.o.�..o. �:,,�;;. r�s o,�a ww..� _ � `1� -1-
Wql� L .. 1 �u�Mb�� -� 1
` 1 �w N.7 � '• \_ � }�k
o� v^wr r� .w:> 1 r' - ma...� � '
� ::��. ` � � , _ � ��i'�
.� �. � ,-',2„ i,�' , T
�
1 , � �� �
1 G• ' l
f r o� � �
��a�f.v Ma'�1 1
eSTi .��� � . -. .�..,.e,. , ` ,, .....�,
� M G � , t ��:>`j � o.r��.« � �� _ J�
't::; y / � �l�ew 1 F
I.MGI � 1'
� � % 1 ` �.�.; ''.'_ �~� —.�...a NEWHUILDI�lCi 11 � .�
� ��,,. / � _ • '�� :?:.... �"'r'�r � 1
.�..�a :'i. r "�o ll�
c:. �'
o ;i`', _ _i::,
� . - - - .t',�;'.'!..- � ,.,
� ' :' ., ;:'� ... � �`
4' ..� ;, _<:� ��-q` �` �f� 2�c.
, *.� , � ;,
� _ ' _ �- ,�,
� .
, � _• .1.. /` S:i �
� 1 M1A�OO�P1 T�I
� �>� 1
' � ��CMl�O� Yy�� - ' .
GW�YM�W �OIdMM I�� .'
�nre� 1 �1V��0�1{fr � ' I'. / -: ' .
1 � � �� � • .� �� i�. �.; l �'. . ....�
t�- , �wl�� _ "�} . ~ 1... � `�j.
1 ` OIl • 1 ..,�'. i `" [' .:w�- '1,�..
1 � � :,�' � , ,�l.: t � .�. �.1.._ ' q.;�. • �
�a.� �1: � .' :;(' ,,`�� /� �u���saso� I �/,
1 dN" ,L , � �ti '�-� ��� � � �sv.aroAVU .��.M � •' !,f�:
� M�M M�dFN*�W
F + ,' , ..`: .1" . 1 ' •
1 � . ��IRL0�10�D�Y� .
r�. � �,T TO�'lil . S �
..J � 011M11N-� I •� �f.
, ,{♦ e�a ow�u� ;.'4 �
/ � �r.r S 61 ��nu�ina� ..1 � �.
w.w � / /, � �w• �
� 1 O�+wt ro+a....a.n�ow �-�'
O��M : M ! _ _ . IwM��10/
�1�OYO1 / �/ r 1... O��0�'�Or�11�nd�I0.1
%�, T maow�n r v�v+•
! : 1
�r�rn• 1 Oa woH ewnr we-.4r.� �
�� � i I � /�o Iw1F��n r�lA�oK.MI
:
• w.o.�e.�.ewe�o�
.�/ , i.. ''.�k i Q/ro.�o.►na rqa vrR
�' /' . ; :,t, � '
1 ` �.' rA�w f l iA I C Q�+v.�n..ne ra..� � . .
, ' �"P�iJ�1 �l"4 O 1w.o.�oMn�nr�e�b . r .•'
� •..,,,,i .yY7 2„G w1.00 , � r:` .
`V
' O f10N L�M�W P/�� '. �
• �� muw«.n�r rn�+.r " � � y
,..... . . . . , � ... .� .:. �
� O�e.�awnr��a . � . L ...
_ •
/ .�..ra-w.....�_.o rr.o+....ro�ruro.w.ro �o.��.r�r r�w►� �.-. 5: . .
i � ��wt� �� 1 w�ro�uw,t.w��nli��l� O OrrM#N��w ' ... N
.
. , � ,l p . .
, -, , � .�,,.,,.o..��....��.a.m... p.�........,.a�,..�
` ^``\�./"� rO It',C'� Yb�lCM�L M�VM IA Kr�1W�tD i00R�O� O ..`�
b b�dRf+P�P�l � IR�d YO�A�Kr��/ � 1
Co: Ore�on State Archives Ca: Gitv af Tigard , ,.,
Fax #: 503-378-4118 Fax #: 684-7297
Ph #: 5D3-373-0701 Ph #� 639-4171, E�. �59
SUBJECT: ARMA CQNFERENCE LOG4
MESSAGE:
Cathy,
The border and lettering are in an aqua color, the mountain is various shades of green
and the blooming tree has pink blassams. They did a fiabulous jab I think!
Dee
xo s�ils�x
z s��va
bS,00 �I�IZ �9F�SI1
TT�£T SZ./7.0 �IM1iIZ .L2IF',LS
QI NOIZ��N�IO�
RTTb 8LF F.OS 'I�Z I�OIZ��NNO�
9TL6 'OH Z2I/YZ
XO KOISSII�ISKF'2I,L
y::l::I::S::k�k:!:Y��:Y::�::f::k%1:�I:�::k:i:%}::i:%F::i::;::i::l::{::I:
x*� .L2IOd�2I �.LIAI,L��' �:��
�::�:�:��*:r.:x:+::�:�x:x:r.x::a::�;��:�x�x x::�;�x��::x
T00�] Q2It'9IZ �0 A,LI� L67.L b89 £09.Q, ZT�ET 86/5Z/7.0
Feb-26-98 01 : 59P P _ O1
� RCHITECTvRE
�
1010 NW Flanders. Suite 204
Portland, �regon 972D9
7el : 503 . 226 . 3617
Fax : 503 . Y26 . 3715
Email : scott.arch0pi-express.com
/ T R A N 5 M I T T A L
� M E M O
T0: ( '. � DATE: 2 • �- ��
v
� � JOB NO: G��OCi>
� Z
1
ATTN: �1 i � ��f �YC'/��
vl
RE: �� �/'ULY./1� �� " 1� �VVI,/K/ —
� � • ' �
'�`�D�S�^ (� Y�G�.
1��11 - '���Se (,��" '�1i1� A,y C�„T,
'� i-�Gv� �� s
q 11`P(n •
G����
SY: ` VIA: PAGES: �
Feb-26-98 01 : 59P P _ 02
FE$-?b-1998 1 1�S� FPf�t� TO SCOTT �"'�I TECT F.�3F31. i3l3�
� �
�
�� P *R*t*D�E
� DISPOSAI. COMPANY
�
� � . p.0. �ox 820 Shetwood. OR 99140 f503)fi25-6177
° � g :
n � S o �
T�i.��414NE: (503) 625-b17'1 FAX p (503) 625-6179
� .
�o
�
N�►x cnvt►i st��t��ti•
�
� � .Te: Z--- �.C^ --��'
� �j1a =
g � 8 a � �: ,Z �a��s���'v- -
7'ET.EYIIANP.;
F�X K�,M�iu�;:__._. . �--73 — $�`�q . . ---. .._____ ---.-- -----
p'l°!'L�N'1'f(1N:
F4ii)F1:_ —._�_�'!'ti.✓� �T� _ . _.._. ._. .r.�
7 `�
wE ARp SENiIINc; t��c:►_S (l NCLIt{�1 N(: �ruTS PACk') . I8 Yot� n� No•r
Keceivr I►t.i. p�' TIlLSS 1�A�:�S. t•I,h;AS�: r:Al.l. II� w� SpC1N A YOS5iRI.F.
i'l1ANK YtlI11
L�v��a s��•-� w � � tivi
�� � ��� ��SPo 4�
� v �
� �r��-t� �5 s�w� ,
_.,� v� ��� �.� s � � �s
� r
. �� ��
�� � �� �
� �
�:,�f 4`iuilrJ o���Dfl'� r�cytlud pope[.
Feb-z6-98 O1 _ 59P P _ 03
FEB-�b-ss?a 11'S6 FPQr` TO S�DTT ':H F TECT F'•Lkl__�:�_
� �
. � �QZ
���
. .�
.
.
' ��
� � .
.
. ' �'
- ,--
�� ' : .
�; .
._
r.
.n
r�
�
r
��
�
�
�
:�� _,,, �.
_ � � '
�
' . ' ' .
�c►� � ' . - ' ,
� • 1
�
�jD}'�n .
� -
�
�
.
.
� ���� `
.
��� �.�"1•�
� t"s �O`�O�
� � z� ��
TGTHL F.l�t�2
. �
ai��:i�iTrx:�r� pL��� ��v�
C.�' G1�1 -���
CX"I' I� 1 \ ` 11 I "f 'I' 1 L C'�1 E ti1 (1 1)�,1�, 2/26/98 ,�„I, \,,. 9665
����,: City of Tigard �;,.: Rite Center
Development Review Department Water Quality Calculation
13125 SW Hall Boulevard PC#: 8-86c
Tigard, Oregon 97223 SIT#�: 97-0083
ph: (503) 639-4171 BUP#: 97-0424
fax: (503) 684-7297
�,�,� Brian Rager, PE
1 copy Water Quality Calculations
Brian:
Attached you will find a copy of the water quality calculation for the Rite Center for your review. Sid
Scott, of Scott Architecture, requested that I send these calc�latians to you.
Please call if you have any questions. � —�
Thank you! `A '�
(.�"' �
V"
, �/�
� 3`��a�
�;� Gregory L. Miller, Project Architect � ;,,, messenger f'�►tal Pages:
Architec�t,Van Lum EJwurd�,Al:�,PC
34 NW First,Soite 309 Pnrtland.OR 9i209
503.2'?6.0590 fiix 503273.8fi49
WALKER/DiLORETOi tOUN1E. u�c. �C��1'�1'C�G;1 OO G 11'G°�Ga[`���]0�1�La L
6420 SW MACADAM AVE, #360
PORTLAND,OREGON 97201
DATE„l �^ ,� �B� �Q'�
�� `I U
(503)768-3930 �rrern�oN
FAX(503)768-3929 2E
RE: —T` �VV � E 1�--
To �\I � 1 �
WE ARE SENDING YOU ' Attached i !Under separate cover via the following items.
! 1 Shop drawings i i Prints i I Plans ' �Calculations Cl Specifications
I I Copy of letter ' I Change order � �
COPIES DATE NO. DESCRIPTION
l �•�� T ��� ►� � .
THESE ARE TRANSMITTED as checked below:
I For approval For next change order Resubmit copies for review
�or your use Reviewed as noted I Return enclosed
I I As requested � I Returned for corrections �Retum corrected prints
' For review and comment '
' I FOR BIDS DUE 19 � �PRINTS RETURNED AFTER LOAN TO US
REMARKS
COPY TO
SIGNED:
I!enclosures are nof as noted, k/nd/y rtotlty at once.
WALKER / DILORETO / YOUNIE, INC.
C O N S U L T f N G S T R U C T U R A L • C I V I L L N G I N E E R S
Principuls
Rnbert A. N4rlker
Dale J DiLorefo
{Ynde W. Yourrre STORM DRAIN CALCULATIONS
Cole G. Pres�l�i�s
FOR
Assocrarc
RITE CENTER
rtlichael Coro��e(
INTERFAITH OUTREACH SERVICES
GREENBURG ROAD
TIGARD, OREGON
AUGUST 28, 1997
rti
.. ��/'y
• ��GYC4l��� �`�f 8 i.
. ���� N �� .
� ik
,� ,
;�°" '' '9 1°
R P
i'
L
�� �
A O„� G
�°�f .,��18 ,�a'0 ��
�� �, i��E``''�
. 'K�1'�!= '��
Wi!lumetre Purk Pluau
G420 S.4V. Mucadunr
Si�ire 3G0
r�„�rtu,�d, na ��za� TABLE OF CONTENTS:
�•n,r so.3i�r,�-���?� STORM DR.AIN CALCULATIONS. . . . . .D-1 THRU D-7
5n3�7G8-3�3n
�
�'1' ALKEIL / DILORE 'TO / YOUNIL, INC.
CCINSULTINC� STKUCTUR �1L • CI VIL ENGINF. f RS
Job 'QLT� ,��TE'Q- Job No. Sheet No._�,?-�
Client a\/ Ll E Date � - � � By�A�
Principals
Robert A. WaGI-er �"—���
Dale l. DiLoreto �������� `�RFA�'�S i'
Warle W. Younie � = / S� ���\ � ,�I /�✓��� � -3 ��/1
I
�� ) L � 4�- . ___. .__
Cole G. Presthus � _ -3�� Z �� 1 _ 93C�
Z ' !
�3 = 32' C�10`� = 22 4a
Associate �Q- � �� �52'�� � �d �
� 5 = 25��52�� + Zz C�g��+ �o�C�) _ �g 9 c�
Michae! Coronel
�� = 28 C 3��� = 1008
b,-� - �o'( �g'� = 180
141 '�S
Aa N s�;E s'C2�) } �`C 84' - »s4
A� _ ��( ,��� _ �soo
�'PP�L�D�. f-�1ZE A = � ��S�� �T 2
��t�� �N� �(GLG�E � 1�I,r-..�'�F Z (•3�o i w>C��T�Z,, � _ �85 F-r3 1
C��TL� ��-T� '� 1��- = S8S �/481,¢x 3�ao�sE _ .��G�S
�o ►-rr= 2,03' , Q�� =C�,�� , .a��= ,�z �-� z(32_2� 2,03� ��
�aN� C�M��u � �t = ,az�s , �= •«�,u=����
'� 8 _
, ,
-� � � � c�e�� - S�� / �-r � I (`1 �,.lc�
�__ ; 3 ' � �,s� ��ti =� 9,7s ��3��r Cro'
�;
";, I
�� —� �2' �l t4� P - � (� �=� �i; - 3`7
k�gor'�'
1 ,
� �� ��`ct��i. i r �`�� � �( 1'�yl I r 1 J \ ` ��
�
I� �ft;P - I l,Z S����� -' `�7i
t�-�'l�l�Q �c�r.)j�—'_�' 7sl �� P - ��y �T3�c� = 32=5 � � l�r<1C,.,.
k �' •
6420 SW Macadam
6� ��
Suire 360 /� � �
Poriland, OR 97201 �--`�� � � 2
FAX 503/768-3929
503/768-3930 `,?,�' _��,
�
Y
V1' ALKLIt / DI LORETO / YOUNIE, INC.
CONSULTINO STRUCTURAL • CIVIL GNGINGGRS
Job �LT� C,�N TG� _Job No. heet No. (�-Z
' Client ,�\� l�ff-, Date �j • By�Aw
,
Principals '
--. . .___. _ .___ � _.. .. _. .,__. ... ,...,
� � �
Robert A. Walker � � _ _._�:..._.,_--..
G o ,
0
Dale.1. DiLoreto � _J ___ __ -_.
o �d �= � ._ � _ �' � _ ' _ !
_ -- ._.. _ _
_=- __ , . _ ;
Wade W. Younie , n � Q g% ; � �
; �
_ . _.;
.__._ _ , 3� _ _ ' i �
Cole G. Presthus t , �.; ; � � _ �. ___ i
0 ' �� �� 1 ' �.
- i ' .
n -- -:....._ .. ___<
A � � � v . m
Associate Y• ��� , �' �
� � '� R
Michael Coronel �' C�J • •
AS� n�_ . � __-._ —__ _ ...____
� � ,
�
a�� �
� �c�,��14) -� ��' �,�" :��I`i .S-�1 = �'�DQ- F�Z
�> ��4 r��� -- 3G3 F�✓
C� � �a ,c, 2-1> = 2`�� .r� �'
� /��•s(34•5� + n5���1.5)� - 2(}/Z C19'S,✓J � 2��ti�2 �i '
�� ��� x �-) - � i -�.x�� � � �-�z �=T Z-
C� C3��5 `::��-+ 2.s �a} - �sg �Ty
G �.SCs) = 2o F� �
��3) �4-t .s,� 34.5�+ �2ax SS.S) +(4 •s x-►,�� - � loxz�� = 2-135 F-�'2
c �,�������� = . � C ,� ��r�,,,� � .�� c�_ �� �
�' -' _ � o - Z � . ► ►3�
�::c�-�� - 2�4�4� -!- 3�0 + 2� �I(� f l d�Z 4� `� �- r7 C�
5�L�c,W�AI..K- + t-�vExE�r-t = �023 t 2l�13= 3C�3Co F�Z = , 683 ��
c���,o�P� _ �2�� �-��- - . 14� pc,-
A�!Cr . C. _ . �9� .9s + �; , 3 - . Co� S
�34- •34
�� � ti� --, ag+ RA�
(� _ �I � = .�-,s (3 ,����.)C ��,8� �X ,Z��}( �M���.� � � F--�3
�c — 312 c�-��
6420 SW Macadam , — -
Suite 360
Portland, OR 97201
FAX 503/768-3929 �p �I� � 1'�� `�/ I G o/a
503/768-3930 �' � _ � . - ��
� � �� r- _ �_ . �`i�-
�
WALKEIt / DILORETO / YOUNIE, INC.
CONSULTING STItUCTURAL • CI VIL GNGIN [iI: RS
Job ���� �NTE�2 Job Noq�70�.S Sheet No. �-3
Client A�l_.1� Date 8 •��J By��
Principals
... . �... . _ _ _ _. _ .
Robert A. Walker A2 . _ _.__.. ,..._: '__ ...___._. ._._.
Dale J. DiLoreto . — __ -- - -- -- _____ ,
� i ' i
1z�F � q`1 � �-f'� '
— .._ . _ .._ . .___�._ �._._. . _..� . _..____ , _.�_ ...__. _M___. . .___,__ .._ �
Wade W. Younie n _ Q S '
�J -� _ _,__ __ �_� :. _�..�; ......�. ...._� '
, Cole G. Presdius � -- 3 1 Nl h'�- ' °
_ — _ _.._ ,
�= C) 1�► _ , SC3►2Ylao J� I���'y� — 3.S-1 �r3�1-�►►� _ " ;
l0 � �
Associate — �� ���'"� _ '._ _�__.._.,
� a
_ _ . _. _ _ ___>
Michael Coronel �
3'' � �,p � � 4-% _ _.: .__ ___.: _;
g ''� �. � . L°. � l °�a ....._.______.:__ :.__ __..._ ._.._�--__.;
A�
R�F - 2-r o+ ��t 3s -- 30o s -r��- _ .o Coq a C�
S�a�w,-'�1�- = 2� �;Z = • aOCo ►�C,
l.c���s�aFc = 2!�4 �rZ = vO�F�I � C�
P��l E G -� �.3� -+- �-�°�.qs) S 6 �q3
, t�4 • ►z4
(,� = c I '�1 = .c�j3(3��� '�>Csaos�y� _ �s.C� �3 /M�N
�0 = I1-1 �pM
_ .. __ _. ._ _ . r .o .�.:
�{-�� � �. � , 3°�a
(��' � �u ,Z°%
p�� -�N� - G � 4� s
1�R-��a = 2,� �z ---
�Q = , � S(3 j Z ��C� CZC�2� 1-�c� -' � ��2 P'i"�'I►-/�►►�t,
6420 SW Macadam
Suite 360 = �� Q �M _
Portland, OR 97201 )
FAX 503/768-3929
503/768-3930
WALKrR / DILORETO / YOUNIE, INC.
CONSULTING STKUCTUR � L • CIVII. k: NGINEERS
Job_�_j-r� ��i.l T E t� Job No�?U°� S Sheet No.�_
Client �� �� Date � •q"7 By��
Principals � � � � �
, �� �
, ,
_.. �__ _, .___ .._.... _. _.__ _ -•-
1 \� f ' � ' ! , i I .
Robert A. WaGI er _ ._ _ _ : _ : _._. . ... ___ ,
Dale l. DiLoreto _ _ _ _ . . _ ___ _ . __ __;
,
�I D=.������ � t�l'rv�,���sT = 320-r 3—I—i o =_4o�c� F�� - . �GG� fl� �..__ `
Wade W. Younie �Z � �
�.�ND.SCi-1PE _ �� �' c=T' ` � _ _ ._ , ,.._._ ;
,
Cole G. Presthus ��E C ; � p2,C 3� � e Oc�L�. \ � � '
�q S� . 83�0 . _ _ ___
.i�4 . ► ► �I-
associare —
G 1 -F� _ - 8 4 �3�►z'�.��6) �'9� 4--�Z_ = 1`� ,4 r-.-c3/I.�`,►�.
�o = l3 1 � P►�n
_._ �.__. ____.
Micitael Coronel
_ _._... ,._._..., __'.__._.. ...__.�__ ...._.._...,
`�'' � ._.
c:; 1 .�% '
__�._ . _._ _ . ._...
� � -, �f
�1 qr, . a �--� ° . _
�
�S
��r- = l Ca4-� �-s" _ .c�38 fl e�
s��,wa�� � 230 �z = .a�'.� t�C,
r
Q = CI R = o9s�3�-X�) �8-is �TZ = `1 .42 �3iM.'� ►�
�o
- _ � ��M
�,,,� . -
_ _ ___ __ Y �.
_,�
� ��., ��
3''� �-, �, a-��/o
C��o� �-��►�, �a��,��� ,2��� C�a = �4s � P� (r�,fi�+aJ��4�a�+
���
lo``� � .32 °'/G
_ _
8'' � � 1 �a�/6 __. � _� _ _. _. �. ; ._.
� , , ; ;
6420 SW Macadam / :_.. '._..__,_ .. _:._...
Suite 360 � _ --1�5 �P� ( 3,d-4�3� � QiV+� Q P M
C)--J�J
Portland, OR 97201 � � –�
FAX 503/768-3929
503/768-3930 �� /'� ��� � _L�� '�' . nK
WALKEft / DI LORCTO / YOUNIE, I1�' C.
CONSULTING STRUCTUR .4L • CIVIL GNGINF. f RS
Job �yY C��t��- Job No. Sheet No. b=S
Client �\1LI� Date ��;� By�
Principafs
Robert A. Walker
7
���'��r v�� t-tT� C�= �.�T�� ��� c�_
Dale J. DiLoreto ----r---�=-------------
�o = --�os a Pn1 = i.s� c� f y-rr D--4�
Wade W. Younie _ 'J _ l`
(�ZS — 8C'� c��rvt — I.`78 C�'� ;}-iT D--� _._.. _
Cole G. Presthus ' �
�� _.. ..__. _... ..
Q1�0 �-7��3.�) 2.3Co c.�� _ —
Associale oRtr�c� __._..-_
@ MH @ s�,x.,
Michae! Corone! �
C��►,r.r,..,n (.c�1�'�.. (,vct�-t = �� + 3' =6 2
�o� ���-cr-�-c-� w���= = Q = 3�t�z C(�)
,
�(ZY H -�jl / , Q - �(I �/Z lol - r�(p �-�
�-{ = . �� � _ �.-�D� �% � l 7c� -�✓ ��- Q zs
}-{ = e 25' � = 2.Z5 ��'� s Z,3� c-�� �c� C�ia�
, _ \ ,-----,_ _ __
- __--� __----
= __---- �
__
- ---- -
�
�� LC��� T� OS— �'`�` 11�� ,�i F~., .�D+�4��/� �i .�F' C�--�.�--�c.
�
�l� [�;�tC� � Pc��� C.�.�� � c��� 5��..�C.�"�.��� �
,
;.
��� '�
� . ___ __ _ __
� _ . . __ _. . :_ ._ _ _._ __.
� �__ __ __________ _.___ _:._._. � . _.-- -...__ _ _,_ _ ___, ._. .
! �
# . _ .
, _ . __.__ ._ _ . ._ ______ _.._ __ _
�
6420 SW Macadam
Suite 360
Portland, OR 97201
FAX 503/768-3929
503/768-3930
� D-�
�
� RATIONAL METHOD
RAINFALL INTENSITIES FOR EAST WASHINGTON COUNTY
� (for Ranges 1 and 2 West)
Rainfall Intensity (inches per hour)
� ,TINIE OF < 'STCC��E'�ENT :::I'Rl{PROB.�BILIZ'Y} ,
'Ct7NC�I�`I�t A�3E�3I�
� , (M�N) � 5 �t� 2S 5a 1Q0 ''
;
' '�5��'3 _�2�9r� ; _��U�a� €��ej ;.... ._���o� (��o�
� 0 1.90 2.50 3.00 3.40 4.00 4.50
5 1.90 2.50 .00 3.40 4.00 4.50
� 10 1.30 1.70 2.20 2.50 3.00 3.50
15 1.10 1.40 1.80 2.14 2.50 2.90
� 20 0.90 1.20 1.50 1.80 2.10 2.40
� 30 0.75 0.95 1.20 1.40 1.65 1.90
40 0.60 0.75 1.00 1.15 1.30 1.60
� 50 0.55 0.70 0.85 1.00 1.15 1.35
70 0.45 �0.55 0.70 0.82 0.95 1.10
� 100 0.40 0.45 0.55 0.67 0.75 0.90
180 or more 0.35 0.40 � 0.50 0.60 0.70 0.85
� .
�
�
�
�
� 160-CH3
�
�
- . • -_--___ D-7
.. , --- �
,� -
' I =�i '..a.. I6:°l -- , c °��=�.�����'�,�.��� ..����� �
i .
_ _ _ •� ___ _ l
"_ � �� �� ���1 :
_' �- / � ,
'1' '• __""'""_ '__'_"' // � / � .
______"____'_'
� � / ��
I � �1 ' -_______� / ! 'I
�i,t _ -� '-___ _-____'___ _�L�l _ /� � �
— —^i __' - - � � i '
� � ��
� i \ � I
/ � _._.` , �
I b`� �m�s��a ��_��. � � � . �;
� �- .
� � � �''`
i ; ; -;:IS i f1�G- � � i
� u
I " ' � ' -
� x , �UI!�I?�� � i i o: r�
I — 1 y i: ��
.1 '�-`� � i'/ � I 1" �'�\, �'�
/ - i- � ~��
I � ' / � , \` -' l y_ �
m A i \, �" i
�
/ `� �- i
��/y �y I I �� I �I�' \ `� +� � �
'-� 1 � �� �e ; ; �;� �\ �"^- �__-' ,' , �' I �; Ij ;� ,—~-;
` � � e �--------'---- -' ----------� 1 c; � \.; / �r�` �� � " .
_., � , ---- , Nor-: ,-, � :,-='` �� ' ., ' ,/
� �� � . i -e^6=`� i �C� �� � �
� � ���� °� I
,\ 8 , � =�ov��-,�,^_ �• r:
, � — ' ' _?�r-�1-�9._c, r- - �' ���`,; /
� � -��/ � � � � I ►—��==- . =, -- r � __ ,-.�, �
�:-, =� , � r�-6,�:i i � � �� � � � .- ----____ -;, , ., �
jI-" �� __- ' �" .— � ;---------------- --;- ,�; ,-' �.
,. �. ' , � - ,- �+ � _------, �; v =� \
1� ..o �� a,i�-� � — —/ � � ___-----'""" '� +', -' `�,�' �`:�
�`� � ,� f=='F— ,F; �" o � r '""_ ���_�'� t� �%� ,� -� �?,
�i I '� � L _ U _ — J , -- - , ���, � .5 � _____ ---�" ��, :.�� .
` � �� � � � '. r � ', •,
� , • - �-' -- ------ ---- _-
, � r , _ .I ��-„ r
. ��� ���
�c: �_c°= _ ___.___ �y �; �•
r- / �;` ,`^ '��
�.� � _ ,,,,- J J �' ` � 1, �� � (A') ' __ �-'�::
� � �• '`� � � ° .; .,�
� l `\
- , , r I `�, �� . , 1_-� ``� �'� ���t \�"'_
r` \��,�' I `'l �- •-' ''� '� `:J `�
�I I ,, _ . �' i �
�� I �' V1 / \
� ^�- �' 1 t; i � \
. 1 i ' + /i� �—��J - /� �,1 �i �`\ /���\•
�I 1�i � i��� � !-�� ���, � 1` ' ' .
/ yi1/ �,�r
�� � � ,� /
� \I � �� � - � �/ i�� `I�� �%
I �1'� -at�_ � \ / / � _6-- _ � ;� ( � I .�JI_!�«�.�� _!__-/-- -�"-- "' `g�?��1't'�-'''
�I � _ _� -' �- I � � ti � _ _��
� � �- \ � - _-_--- J _ -
� o /' ��� � .o,�o � ,_-' �_ `_ -_ ---- ���` �_� �
� L 0 / �?� r I n='1 / , %
. � I , O ,� � � ��
. ; -. . ,�_o, --� __�-= P12 �,,- �` � 11 �� �\�� ,--- __-" �
" ti � �� �� 1 1 1 / rr^ i �
,,\�_ �i _ � .3 ' - / � � � �� i' -- �,
i �
_ �i G � �r � /� ��/
; ����_ ` • �, � � � / / � �
;� 1 � �//// /, � ��/� _' r_ -_'_J �// - �-, � ' i�j,
1 i / �-.=
!�' � `` �� __ .. re o� / �,1 ��� � � ' � � � _ ---- j'
.��i11 1 ` �� � �1-c,� � � �!:if I` �i------ .�i
.,��'���1 p / a�'� \ ' '� �1 ._ ____=i---"" ,,� ' �;�%'� %�
,� � — —= �� � �/-.
�.,��1�' S�_�°_ / (c--� 1 + Q , ' . .
�t' �"p _j '%
l �� l '� �� / , � � ' - .
'' ;, - ' 1 __� ,, �;�+J o ,;'��,;,r'
5t0�= �i � ____'" . l `
' � 1�1� '� � �� ' '`4TlN�.,_'Z ` / �1 �'f. fs
� �I _ � �X��:';1M / 1 ' ///'�f
�� / � �:X.ce1��JT.f.' . . .1,i 1 i i�f !
l %_+ --- � ��GLo� i�// I�__`'"1 � ` /�� ���� `,i-
, `I ,�_ -- _` i.-�- -s--�r , i_;,=
< <' � -1_�_--`-_-�----�--- �, /, ,
-- �_'F '; � "` a _ - - �\ :-�=----• - ;� �'. '` --- CyV– C' I G
'�1,,� �_- �=° a n ' 1�. �//`� � � -�l_..-
�;'�� _ p, 1 � � /'�j ' . '��
� '��"� � , , � � ° %�-'" �'� �' T121 GU��y ���v�C��
a .-
'�:�;'', — ^ _� � ��/,'• ��,, �r � � ,
�`�,, �� 1 ``r��- __ 1 � ���j,��,' / �'� � u v v
1'���, 1�` 1 ` �f— ` � � �/ / / / � �� ( `r ��'
i
` , ';, �'�6�� � � ����£� i ER090N CON7ROL N0T`S
;`I�;`�1 � , �i"�/� ��j/�/ �� _ � l. No qrcding octivitles shatl loke ploce
L , � � i � tne arawings
�� m `��//'' �' �i� 1\ 2' ADProval 01 tnis eros�x/••
I� --- - i �i �i � on approwl of c�..
t,; 1 ' ��� �/' � rocaz. c�,..
� � -- 6 �� �� 3. Tn. ,
y''�j-��1 '--------------� `/� ��/ .
``1 //� /�i
1�'� ,�` �' �' �'
i
�'�� �' �� /. i i'
'1l, � ��
. 1'!`1� K\ � �/
�. �� /� � �zi
i '
1, � /
`1 `� � //
' , /� �/i '/
y,��t • '11 i i /�/
.� /
I �y r/ W r► `�/ 'r '� � � 'O� � r �' rI �' � �IY �► � Y� r �' � �' � V' � rY �1/� W M� d' r � �' �' rY r► �+ QV W rY �IV rf r+ r✓ W vY rv �ri' � rr � �s
�r +► � ��` " l :
� -
c�'n Project No.�l`1UP,�1�� Designed by S 1W Date � �q 7 Checked by CCt� Date 8 ' q 7
� ProjectName THE i�1 '� E �.�r.�"r'E ��=- Page � oi�_
�n
� DESIGN DESIGN CALCULATIONS DESIGN INVERT
� SECTI�N ELEVATIONS
INCR. TOTAL INTEN- INCR. RUNOFF EQUIV. TOTAL RUNOFF VELOC.
1 CAPA-
� TIME TIME SITY AREA COEFF. �NCR. EQUIV. RUNOFF SLOPE DIA. C��, VELOC. � @ LENGTH
o M.H.TO M.H. AREA AREA CAPAC. Q/Qi
�R UPPER LOWER
ST.TO ST. T Ti I A C- CA ECA Q S d Qi Vi QlQi V L
minutes minutes In./hr. acres coelf. acres acres ds % indies ds i s ratio i s feet
� I J �J � o�`^ .lD�/ r (�� .�� e10�� I . � �CJ p`�� I e 1 �� i t• V � I
AZ � S 3 �azz .9s aGZ� .�zi a�� � •0 3 e1 � 2. 2 .sS 2�� 32 �
0
�
�
�3 �� � � .IZ� ,��i .0� ,�� ,os�l I , S �- ,3(� 3.�}- . 2 2-� I�S m
. r�n
�
v
rn
�
�
z
�
0
�S � 5 3 .044 ,qs .o� •�2 . ►zs � .S 4- �3'� , .� v3q 3.4 � ao
�
A, , AzAS3 5 5 3 . � 14- .8� .o�i� o4�t5 I 4"� � ,O 8 I A� �-.Z .98 4,8 �
A�, AZ, ,�3
4 S a . 5 .� � �C�4�e ,`�S ad4�' �52 � ,5(� , -�j �� � �� 3 ,3 .�1 3 •, ��
�
� O
� �
� � �
� N
N
CITY OF TiGARD
February 27, 1998 �REGON
Mr. Gregory L.. Miller, Project Architect
ARCHITECTS VAN LOM EDWARDS
34 NW First, Suite 309
Portland, OR 97209
RE: Planninq Division Outstandinq Conditions of Approval for The Rite Center(CUP 97-0006)
Dear Mr. Miller.
This letter is to infoRn you of the remaining Conditions of Approval related to Conditional Use Permit
(CUP) 97-0006, `The Rite Center" land use approval, that pertain to the Planning Division
requirements. To date, the following conditions remain outstanding:
CONDITION #6:
Documentation that tax Iots 02500 and 02600 have been consolidated. While the tax lots
have been consolidated for taxing purposes, the issue of underlying property lines and their
resulting issues with the UBC still have not been clarified.
The revised plan, as well as the building permit site plan, does not show the provision of a five
(5)-foot fence, as was previously shown on the preliminary plat. This fence is required. A
revised plan shall be submitted that notes this fence shall be constructed. ��� ��2j�g
The City is unable to issue building permits until these conditions are satisfied. These are Planning
Division conditions only. Other City department(s) may have additional conditions that need to be
satisfied. For a complete list of outstanding conditions, please contact a Development Services
Tecnnician at the City of Tigard at 639-4171, ext. 304.
If you have any questions conceming the infoRnation in this letter, please feel free to contact me at
639-4171, ext. 315.
Sincerely,
C/r�(J"" ' .% �^'°`—`
Wlliam D'Andrea
Associate Planner/AICP
c: CUP 97-0006 land use file
1998 Planning correspondence file
i:�cu�pk,IwitM�,pe�-0s.cr,2
13125 SW Halt Blvd„ Tigard, OR 97223 (503) 639-4171 TDD (503) 684-2772
Mar-02-98 08: 35A P_ Ol
� � RCHITEC � URE
1010 NW Flanders, Suite 204
Portland, Oregon 97209
Tel : 503 . 226 . 3617
Fax : 503 . 226 . 3715
Email : scott.arth�pi-express.com
/ T R A N 5 M I T T A L
, M E M O
TO: ! j DATE: 3 • �� q
\.JI
ln fi. ,06 �o: � D�
S� - �zq
ATTN: W;�� P` �rn�r�� .
RE:
( r / 1 1 � ��� YYI �i/iJ���0��/1 /
� + •/ -✓ I I `I• I/
(,�i INII� �✓f' � '�IY1�' U�P1�i/
`�1�C �UU COV vl�r � �'i� �j� GinG�
�'c�n C�,-fi n vov�s -�, -�e t,l�C�'�►�r
. �
� v� s�
Ca,�JI •
� -
Br: VlA: PAGES: z
` ��M YI�/I�f\�YluMS O 'l�fM��0 M�� ^
�NIMYO di1 1NYTi W�MW 11�/4A1�a'�
� w.�r r w Mn wr.+Q �ww�w i.'r'�..a.�a�iw e u�.�o.n�ru'�i.�w. 'v��� �� +✓���' '
t� - www M�w�w Q rv.ayr a r.r ^� � ` CS 1
�
��'�WI6�'.....�.�....�.� � 3
11�M Mfil M1��iM�1 O 'JY�S��Y m+0��1MYM O�1 io
J�• Y'1 ��� : �.: Cwv��wl�1�w awww w �.:W � f/
��� � R�1�Y�V MPr O � �//� 4 �
r�v. ... � 3 c: ` !'
�y �.. �r.,w.r...us�o � -�L'P r' p � ��`' r
�{, L �, `` .. w w+e wu«e Naai Q /� /� / �
� � } asr w� �✓11� l.�^ ,'�
.�:.�1.'.'.�::r.���.�}:. a+n�rw�w�e i►.d�Q �
�� �...,..�.,..a.�p ��2J(� ��I i , .1 ' N
'_,.,.. w :':'.':::'. uw,�a..u�.s�.sr0. �` i• t / �- I
'=•'.. � re�rre�uu.oiv 'i:, � .. �
."�"� �w�n�-�w`~Mir�a'�wa�'ii � ; •�a"�'�i�
� . � • � �
'{iF.:::::;::i ., , /
1 .YAN�Yw101� . .
ti twraiw.wo wo�Q :.:� 1 1 �.s..�u.o.n.�
t �.•. . �. '•.,•r� w..r.w ra,w
FarSM�Iw�Ni�M N�O �.M � ^ 1 Wy�~�.p��
. �l,.�ii:'.`... ��ib.�«.M�a�Q t05 f, � ij ��
� • / � 1 ►Y`y`N�i9i m i�/j . 'Q ,�'� � � / . �
� . ,.e ; , D
. . , ...o�,..o.o.`. ';
� „ 1
�•'�• � ) .�.�.�. �'nT**��«vu�i "�:�' �Y ,. '• `�� � � ,r,r :
�^ / m�a.�ova aua t r �; �1'� �
,�' r . t � , , . -`, 'S.
� • � �r� , - � r- � - -
�, t ,„� � � �
'� ' •,:,h� •r. /
:;:. � �
%�� � �..� � � ' �'.Y' • ��.. wp ��
�e �
` _ .: � .. • ' 1 :
� \ - :
.,s .,..�. � :� ,v,.o.
.p..0.0..
��
� .. �: : I ..� In�O'C11 .�_ . ..
. • � ♦
.. ':.. :':... :. � r�. �' �, .����► �YI YO Y� � ' ��� �
:. .�.. .. . . .
..................................... . ..��
.................... � .
.. /YY �sw�`MqM � / 1
•w � ll�i _ 1
/1 �M/O��IO �
� �( ��, 1�1 � �
11 T/ �� .= � ',.�„t^'. � � 1
.£:-� .;: � �:
� .:�� ' ?� � .. r•
r . f :A.��.Z.�. �4��•� y ��
.�� �+ :\' � ;y � �) ��'. 0 �
..Z! . _' '� �S:.D•.• :.:�.1?'• 1
OL�' . ,-'.�.:. :: � .�V=..�:.='[r 1 , �
l� _,,F..+. �•.' . � .Aa•.. /
,�.,�„"`N' T�1�3A sc.r rw. -.:.�� _.�>�.7`:�'" D'� 1
� •-'c � t
,.., _; `y: , { 1
� j 1 :�-_ '_ �
�1 �v�•�v �.,-y
�-�" r � ...� , � � + ;�; �N L
� t ��„� t� . .. � � �.
� , .b..r.a. ,-. � S7
\ \1 ...,ea...o , =,�;_ �t.�o..na.,. _ '�.
� '..P.;. :� 1 ': `
` I�. . _v
� 1 . '�1'_•i::':- 1 T .,
`�.. T 1 ,.t;:1'�;t;' � � � � �,�,;
�. • ri. � i � �.w°_.w i .:�s�. �i ,� �:i`7f' wo wa � w•
��,., '.i:' _ _,-^'�� �.e.vw+ - www�
I � �' �:�,,,,�, ; - ,� ��w.w�.e a� 4'� •.s...�e.. �wwva `. .��
o `V �
; i. 1�� ; --_ � �.., a+«a°°°� J. � • �.�.:t- ,.''t::.A i'.
.. �� ;t::• ���.:.,� ..::
..� . . , r3 , �;;�...• �:,;
�i ��:1" .4� 4. `ri�•�
zj,��. `'t'. .; r,r {� '� l. ��`�, '.e
� >.��r ,i � � "� t, �c '�� g ?' ' y.�--+r� :
�1 , ? � � i
���.r, w�r
. ,3i,,✓i: �� � � ,` � '�.���r 1�
,, J f ^,...;,� �. l nww.
, �'�:...r�., t � r y ,,' W t � 1 � ';�
�., ; �� � • I
� .:��- � ,l' '�. � � \ il -�):� � 1 `�, f ..�.
� �..,.,,,,�" .. ,.��:yy���� � h
, r...... r.�•� `+�� .«�w. .r,...� f tf 1F � � � � '` ' �
. � 1 I
�
♦ `
� �:....i' �
, � . . ( .
�f� L— �
--��__.�J �� . , � /.
V � .::�: ;��:� :�:::: �::ti : ��. c��� .• , I ;
: � �� �� n . ::, ._.: •:: r ! �
,�.,.`. �:::: ��:: ► � x /,
<..� � - ::li :�:::� ::s::� • �:::
� :::� :::>>:::::� �:;�� . -�:�:,�-
� " "r .�o,�+ta s
� � : . � � �
y .,,w,�.�. � O
�wre�ti.w r�w•i� � �w�r apir . . . �wwM� ��•• , wsw� ��..�w `
N
.r.� � �• ,. • . � �
;
s
i �i
March 18, 1999 C� �F �G�
OREGON
Jerralynn Ness, Executive Director
Community Action Organization
1001 SW Baseline
Hillsboro, OR 97123
Dear Ms. Ness:
� Pursuant to your pending occupancy of the building formerly known as the
Rite Center at 11070 SW Greenburg Road, Tigard, Oregon, I am writing to
confirm that your use of the facility will conform to the approval granted to
Interfaith Outreach Services on July 25, 1997.
You indicated that the Community Action Organization wilf continue the
same services as the Rite Center with a different management
organization.
This use was approved by the City of Tigard and remains with the
property. You may occupy the facility under the approval previously
granted.
If you have any questions, please call me at (503) 639-4171 x316.
Sincerely,
_ <<�['c�-..J% � �,c_,i
Richard H. Bewersdo
Planning Manager
i:\curpin\dick\Community Action Organization Letter
c: CUP 97-0006 Land use file
1999 Planning correspondence file
City Council
Bill Monahan
13125 SW Hall Blvd., Tigard, OR 97223(503)639-4171 TDD(503)684-2772
� _-_
hVdM No YOZ . .�, . � .. � ... , .i.�ti. � � . . ..
I t1 �
�;.�Et�;.�i� ,►�i, �.�t.r: ur:r.u—,•r���rt��r�►�tr r��>it�a
_i�.� . `aArF �.,!tAfvTt.;�
Interfaith Outreach Services , Inc.
_ .. . ... . ... . -. _ _ _ _ . _.._ ... _ _. ._ ___ __ ......_ _ . _
�� corporation duly organized and exis[in,� under the laws of the 5tate oI ..._.__..___.__.___....__._......._.__.__.-_Grantor,
conveys co _I.nterfai.th_ Outreach _Seryi.ces., Inc...
__._ _ ._. _.. ...... ._.... ... ........... . ..__ .__ __.
.... __._ . _ _ __ . ......... ._.. ... . . ... _ _._ _. ..___ _ ___ __ ____..._.. __._.. .. .... -- - . . .. ..__ _ _.
.._...._..Grantee, the followin� described real property situated in ._.�dashinqton _c�unr}•,
....._........_... __ -.... . - - --- -- -- � - -
Oregon, to-wrt:
Exhibit "A" attached hereto and made a part hereof----
THIS DEED GIVEN TO CREATE ONE TAX LOT.
(IF SPACE I�dSUFFiUENT, CONTINUE DESCRIPiiON ON REVERSE SIDE�
The true consrderation for ihrs conveyance is $�_Q�'��.---.-..._...... (Here comply with the requiremenrs of ORS 93.030)
---�..................••-•--��----•�----�- ---...- ......---� ---..............--- _..............--•------- - �----- --- ----------�- ... - - - ------ -- - --- ......-- � -............._...
---- �--�--••----........•--...•---•�-- -�. .......... ...--... --...._........_..---......_.....-•-•-�-•-�--�---...----�---------�------... --�- �---�---- -------� � --...-� •-- � ....._.............
� .....................................••---�•-- --•-�-------•�-�---�-�------ ---�----�----... ---...._................._....................---.. . .. ---•---.....--.-•.-
..._... .... ....._..
.....
Done by order of the grantor's board of directors with its corporate seal affixed on.. __ f.L1'" . ....I.�................ 19q.g
INTERFAITH OUTREACH SERVICES... ..........�-�.---... ......... .... .. __. ..._...,:�-.----...--- ............. ..
�CORPORATE SEAL� *�•O. BOX 230821 BY -- -- -- -- --- -- ---- ------ ------- --�-- ---- ----- - - ._ . residenf
' +���.OR 91281 gY --- . ----.._-----Secretary
STATE OF OREGON, County oE ���a�`-��M�. )ss. �I�'`e/� �` _ , 19 �
( ��� ��
Personally appeared . � '�+-+l 4.� �- I..GW✓.s and _ .
who, each being lirst duly sµ'orri, did say that the lormer L's th � J� ....t � 1 presrdent and rhat the latter is the
. . . .. .. _. _. . . - -----. _. . ..secretary o! .��.1��_ `� ^"(/1f�,�. .VGs.✓I�C[�/ �.nL-. . . . ._ . .
V
_ _ _ , a corporation, and that the sea/ attixed to the fore�oin� inst�umenf
is the corporatr_ceal�pf..s�ttf„rr,Qiporation and that said instrument µ�as si�ned and sealed in beha/t of said corporateon by authority of its
� ,'�.� �Rip'�i'A. t�g . . . �`Y _ t and deed. �
� �.� , � ��_C., , � �
board of drr tora, each ot c vµ e Ld said mstrun�ent tu be its voluntar ac
OFFICIAL S t � �('� �p;+�- Before me: ._-{.� . .. ._ S '4�
�S�-' .%���!S'i`;...'?'�rJC; On?'�':' Notary Public for Oreg�n; My commission expires:�1 _� ..
� ., ._ .. . , � � :��:w•
BARGAIN AND SALE DEED �
STATE OF OREGON
._. .__ .. GRANTOR C5.
.... .. .. . . � -._.. .. . . ..
/... ..... ...... t �
�1 _ � �4/I •� GRAN�E COUIltY O( . .... ..._ ._._ . ..
�e.l�Tt�� � ����liL�.� ..
n�� y �� I certif that the within ir.stru-
�C' CX:F.��� ���C.r�i����'�2�j) Y
GRANTEE'S AODRESS., IF ment was received for record on the
After recording refum to: day Of - , 19.. ,
N��'1 �.CG�t.�i�fv sP.,�e RESERVED ai o'clock M.,and record�d
Z'T}cQ'�>>rl �t'�['�L'4^.,} ��;��y;�r�� FoR in book on page or as
. P`�� [��X..�l-��.1� �.- .. .. RECOROerr�s usE f1le�lEP.I 71UI]'t.bef ... . _._ ... .
�
�,�1 NA�?to�ssj��?'� y Record of Deeds of said County.
� Witness my hand and seal of
Until a change is requested,al! fax slatements COUI1fy affrxed.
shall be sent to ihe following address:
�1YY1�l`�L.,.Iv __
�}�`��j-� O�*}���'��'n;�('�` Recordin� Otficer
�) �C•x �L'O,� 1 By� Deputy.
I�;,u c� C��.. ��Z� i
NA�E, ADORE55 ZIP
r- —
EXHIBIT 'A'
Being a tract of land situated in the NE 1/4 of the SW 1/4 of Section 35, Township I South,
Range 1 West, Willamette Meridian, City of Tigard, Washington County, Oregon, said tract
being a portion of those tracts of iand described in document no. 96-13555, Washington County
Deed Records more particularly described as follows:
Beginning at a 5/8" iron rod with yellow plastic cap marked "G & L Land Surveying, Inc." at
the most westerly corner of the Plat of "Ash Creek Park Condominium Stage II", thence along
the southwesterly line of said Plat S 37°06'14" E 65.79 feet to a point from which a S18" iron
rod with yellow plastic cap marked "G & L Land Surveying, Inc." bears iv 37°06'14" W 1.00
feel;
thence leaving said southwesterly line alang the northerly line of the Plat of "Ash Creek Park
Condominium", S 73°29'40" W 50.70 feet to a 5/8" iron rod with yellow plastic eap marked
"G & L Land Surveying, Inc.";
thence continuing along said northerly line S 24°57'20" E 14.40 feet to a S/8" iron rod;
thence continuing along said northerly line S 62°54'27" W 201.78 feet to a 5/8" iron rod on the
easterly right-of-way line of S.W. Greenburg Road (C.R. 2043, of variable width);
chence leaving said northeriy Plat line alortg said easterly right-of-way line N t7°24'04" W
17.23 feet to the beginning of a curve to the right having a cadius of 686.25 feet and a long
chord bearing N 16°03'36" W a distance of 32.13 feet, from which point of curvature a 5/8"
iron rod with yellow plastic cap marked "W & H Pacific" bears H 17°24'04" W Q.09 feet;
thence 32.13 feet along said curve through a central angle of 02°40'S7";
thence continuing along said easterly right-of-way line N 75°16'S3" E 0.26 feet to the beginning
of a curve to the right having a radius of 658.05 feet and a long chord bearing N 07°23'47" W,
a distance of 155.96 feet;
thence continuing along said right-of-way curve 156.32 feet to a 5/8" iron rod with yelJc�w
plastic cap marked "G & L Land Surveying, Inc.";
thence leaving said easterly right-of-way line along the northerly line of that tract of land
depicted in Survey No. 26,794, Washington County Survey Records. N 87°41'O1" E 95,86 feet
to a 5/8" iron rod with yelIow plastic cap marked "G & L Land Surveying, Inc." at the mest
westerly northwest corner of the Plat of "Ash Creek Park Condominium";
chence along the westerly line of said Plat S Ob°41'S4" E 57.76 feet to a SJ8" iron rod with
yellow plastic cap marked "G & L Land Surveying, Inc.";
thence continuing along said westerly line N 78°26'25" E 116.19 feet to the Point of Beginning.
FEH-26-1998 14�27 96X P.02
4I
Q
p�
�
C�
�r
� �
m �
Z n
W
W �
�1 cU
� �
�
cn I �1���CP�J�
�i'���,'�d0
� N 6T41' 1' E
95.86' Q�y�/��y5�/5�/yt��Jq�/��}p�
r� PO[NT OF IfKS/'d1%L�l'@,�'Ltll'+7/U"VC5(9�Q/
� BEGNNNC
v � ����
� �' �, E t16.,9')l'� s
o� �
r' N i 8'�6 25~ J�
_s-- /'e•
� �.
�0- f.
e - ,s3s�3s' f,,� ,�
R � 658.05'
I� L = 156.32'
CM N55.63•47~ w S�yfl90�C1�
5 24'S7'20' E
(14.40'){t)�
1 N 75'16'53' E
0.28'
A + 02'40'S7'
�E R = 686.25' �.y� �
�y,�, 1 � _ �z.��' 1'� a
Sp,pO CH = N16'03'36"W S 6 p�1
\ � � 32.13' �
p� E
i73'�� N 17'2t'D4" W
i 7.23'
� ������
�,��l:�Y��
1
` N.T.S.
�
FEB-26-1998 14�28 96i P.03
r
�
Jerry R. Hanson, Ex �fficio
Washington County Cler�k
J.55 N lst Avenue Suite 7.3U
Hillsbaro, Or 97124
PHc?NE b48-8751
Receipt # : 204956 Interfaith OutrE�ach Servir�s Inc
p3/15/1998
, . Documenta #. . Rec, . . . Surv�y V�cc. . Transfer. A&T Fnci NanStc� LiS. . Tot��1. . . . .
� 98U25�54 20. 00 8. OU 20. 00 48. OU
�:
48. OU
Urand To�dl 1'aid 48. �U
M ����1 an� _—___--�-- �cl . r>�
, .
�
I
i
'�
I
I
II
�
� _ _ _