The URL can be used to link to this page

CUP1999-00001 �� , P � `� 120 DAYS = 1/12/2000 CITYOFTIGARD Community Development Shaptrg A Better Community CITY OF TIGAR� `Washirr�ton County, Oregon NOTICE OF FINAL ORDER N0. 99-03PC BY TNE PLANNING COMMISSION Case Number(s): CUP1999-00001/PDR1999-00002NAR1999-00024/MIS1999-00026 Case Name(s): SWAMI VISWA PREMANANDA TEMPLE ADDITION Name of Owner(s): Brahmapremananda Ashrama Name of Applicant: Swami Viswa Premananda . Address of Applicant: 11515 SW Hall Boulevard Address of Property: 11515 SW Hall Boulevard Tax Ma s /Lot No s .: 1 S135DA, Tax Lots 1400 and 3503 Request: ➢ ON DECEMBER 6, 1999, THE PLANNING COMMISSION APPROVED THE REQUEST FOR CONDITIONAL USE TO CONSTRUCT A TEMPLE AN EXISTING ASHRAM (TEMPL AD US MEN B TO �THE FRONTTYARDESETE ACK FOREA REL$GIOUSSFAOOMY HA� PPROVED. THE REQUEST FOR A VARIANCE TO THE ACCESS WIDTfl H , ND CONCLUSIONS DESCRIBED IN FURTHER DETAIL WITHIN THIS FINAL ORDER. Zone: C-P; Professional Commercial. Action: ➢ ❑ Approval as Requested � Approval with Conditions ❑ Denial Notice: Notice was published in the newspaper, posted at City Hall and mailed to: 0 Owners of record within the required distance 0 Affected governmental agencies � The affected Citizen Involvement Team Facilitator � The applicant and owner(s) The adopted findings of fact, decision and statement of conditions can be obtained from the Tigard Planning Division/Community Development Department at Tigard City Hall. Final Decision: THIS DECISION IS FINAL ON DECEMBER 13, 1999 AND BECOMES EFFECTIVE ON DECEMBER 29, 1999 UNLESS AN APPEAL IS FILED. Appeal: The decision of the Review Authority is final for purposes of appeal on the date that it is mailed. Any party with standing as provided in Section 18.390.040.G.1. may appeal this decision �n accordance with Section 18.390.040.G.2. of the Tigard Community Development Code which provides that a written appeal together with the required fee shall be filed with the Director within ten (10) business days of the date the notice of the decision was mailed. Th� appeal fee schedule and forms are available from the Planning Division of Tigard City Hall, 13125 SW Hall Boulevard, Tigard, Oregon 97223. THE DEADLINE FOR FILING AN APPEAL IS 3:30 PM ON DECEMBER 28, 1999. Questions: If you have any questions, please call the City of Tigard Planning Division at (503) 639-4171. � ' 120 DAYS = 1/12/2000 NOTICE OF FINAL ORDER N0. 99-03PC BYTHE PLANNING COMMISSION CITYOFTIGARD Community Deve(npment FOR THE CITY OF TIGARD, OREGON S�p�&��tterCommurrity A FINAL ORDER APPROVING A LAND USE APPLICATION FOR CONDITIONAL USE TO CONSTRUCT A TEMPLE AND PLANNED DEVELOPMENT FOR EXPANSION OF THE EXISTING ASHRAM (TEMPLE) TO ALLOW RESIDENTIAL USE OF TWO(2)BEDROOMS FOR THE RESIDENTS AND EIGHT(8)GUESTROOMS, AS WELL AS, AN ADJUSTMENT TO THE FRONT YARD SETBACK FOR A RELIGIOUS FACILITY. THE RE(�UEST FOR A VARIANCE TO THE ACCESS WIDTH HAS BEEN DENIED. THE COMMISSION HELD A PUBLIC HEARING TO RECEIVE TESTIMONY ON THIS APPLICATION ON DECEMBER 6, 1999. THE PLANNING COMMISSION HAS BASED THEIR DECISION ON THE FACTS, FINDINGS AND CONCLUSIONS DESCRIBED IN FURTHER DETAIL WITHIN THIS FINAL ORDER. SECTION I. APPLICATION SUMMARY SWAMI VISWA PREMANANDA TEMPLE ADDITION CASES: on itiona se ermit Planned Development PDR 1999-00002 Variance VAR 1999-00024 Setback Adjustment MIS 1999-00026 APPLICANT/ Swami Viswa Premananda PLANNING Alpha Engineering OWNERS: 11515 SW Hall Boulevard CONSULTANT: Mike Miller, Project Mgr. Tigard, OR 97223 Plaza West, Suite 230 9600 SW Oak Street Portland, OR 97223 PROPOSAL: The applicant has requested Conditional Use Approval to construct a temple and Planned Development approval for expansion of the existing Ashram (temple) to allow residential use of two (2) bedrooms for the residents and eight (8) guestrooms. A Variance has been requested to the access width, as we(i as an Adjustment to the front yard setback for a religious facility has been requested. LOCATION: The subject site is located at 11515 SW Hall Boulevard. The properties are also identified as WCTM 1 S135DA, Tax Lots 1400 and 3503. COMPREHENSIVE PLAN and ZONING DESIGNATION: C-P; Professional Commercial. APPLICABLE REVIEW CRITERIA: Community Development Code Chapters 18.330, 18.350, 18.370, 18.390, 18.510, 1$.530, 18.705, 18.745, 18.765, 18.775, 18.790, 18.795 and 18.810. SECTION II. PLANNING COMMISSION'S DECISION The Planning Commission finds that the proposed development meets the applicable approval criteria of the Tigard Community Development Code and that the proposal will not adversely affect the health, safety and welfare of the City. The Planning Commission, therefore, APPROVES the requested Land Use Applications with the exception of the Variance, subject to the following recommended conditions of approval: SWAMI VISWA PREMANANDA TEMPLE ADDITION PAGE 1 OF 23 CUP1999-00001/PDR1999-00002NAR1999-00024/MIS1999-00026 PLANNING COMMISSION FINAL ORDER NO.99-03PC CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL � THE FOLLOWING CONDITIONS SHALL BE SATISFIED PRIOR TO FINAL SITE � INSPECTION: (Unless otherwise noted, the Staff contact shall be BRIAN RAGER, Engineering Department 503-639-4171.) THE FOLLOWING CONDITIONS SHALL BE SATISFIED PRIOR TO ISSUANCE OF THE SITE AND/OR BUILDING PERMITS: Planninq Conditions: � 1. Submit a detail of the bicycle rack. 2. Submit a revised plan that shows three (3 additional bicycle parking spaces will be provided. 3. Submit a revised plan that shows a clearly marked walkway across the access drive/parking lot connecting the existing sidewalk and the proposed sidewalk. 4. Submit a revised plan that shows the 5 proposed parking spaces deleted from the site plan OR the access drive must be widened to provide, at minimum, a 40-foot pavement width. The revised plan must show at least one (1) van accessible handicap space will be provided that includes a 9-foot-wide space with an 8-foot-wide aisle in front of the proposed development. 5. Submit a floor plan that shows the total area dedicated for living facilities (guestrooms and resident's rooms) will be less than 3,460 square feet. 6. Submit a lighting plan indicating the location and intensity of the lighting to be provided. The applicant shall submit details of the lighting plan indicating that the light will be directed away from residential properties. 7. Hours of operation shall be limited to prohibit worship services from being held before 6:00 PM, Mondays through Fridays with the exception of legal holidays. 8. Submit a revised plan the clearly states the site size, the amount of impervious surface and the amount of landscaped area on the subject site alone. 9. Submit a revised plan showing setback dimensions that scales accurately. Enqineerinq Conditions: 10. Prior to issuance of a site and/or building permit, the applicant shall pay an addressing fee in the amount of $30. 11. Additional right-of-way (ROW) shall be conveyed to the State of Oregon, by and through its Department of Transportation, Highway Division, along the frontage of SW Hall Boulevard to increase the right-of-way to 45 feet from centerline. The description shall be tied to the existing right-of-way centerline. Verification that the conveyance has been submitted to the State shall be provided to the City Engineering Department. (For additional information, contact Rick Reeves, Oregon Department of Transportation, right-of-way Section, 123 NW Flanders, Portland, OR 97209-4037; Phone: 731-8461). 12. The applicant's construction plans shall indicate that they will provide an on-site water detention facility designed to meet Unified Sewerage Agency (USA) Design Standards. SWAMI VISWA PREMANANDA TEMPLE ADDITION PAGE 2 OF 23 CUP1999-00001/PDR1999-00002NAR1999-00024/MIS1999-00026 PLANNING COMMISSION FINAL ORDER NO.99-03PC ' � 13.� The applicant shall Nrovide an on-site water quality fac;��ity as required by Unified Sewerage Agency Design and Construction Standards (adopted by Resolution and Order No. 96-44). Final plans and calculations shall be submitted to the Engineering Department (Brian Rager) for review and approval prior to issuance of the building permit. In addition, a proposed maintenance plan shall be submitted along with the plans and calculations for review and approval. 14. The applicant shall either place the existing overhead utility lines along SW Hall Boulevard underground as a part of this project, or they shall pay the fee in-lieu of undergrounding. The fee shall be calculated by the frontage of the site that is parallel to the utility lines and will be $27.50 per lineal foot. If the fee option is chosen, the amount will be $880 and it shall be paid prior to issuance of a site and/or building permit. THE FOLLOWING CONDITIONS SHALL BE SATISFIED PRIOR TO A FINAL BUILDING INSPECTION: Enqineerinq Conditions: 15. To ensure compliance with Unified Sewerage Agency Design and Construction Standards, the applicant shall employ the design engineer responsible for the design and specifications of the private water quality facility to perform construction and visual observation of the water quality facility for compliance with the design and specifications. These inspections shall be made at significant stages, and at completion of the construction. Prior to final building inspection, the design engineer shall provide the City of Tigard (Inspection Supervisor) with written confirmation that the water quality facility is in compliance with the design and specifications. Staff Contact: Hap Watkins, Building Division. Planning Condition: 16. Construct all improvements as shown on the approved plans. Any modifications to plans must be approved by the Planning Division PRIOR to the modification. FAILURE TO SATISFY THE CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL WITHIN 18 MONTHS OF THE EFFECTIVE DATE OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION'S DECISION SHALL RENDER THE PLANNING COMMISSION'S DECISION VOID. SECTION III. BACKGROUND INFORMATION Site Historv: Staff conducted a computer search for case history on the subject parcels. None of the parcels had previous land use applications on file. The site has a shared parking agreement with the office complex to the north (Hall Corporate Center). When this office was constructed (SDR97-00014NAR97-0008), parking spaces were constructed on the subject site as well and a variance was approved for access width to allow 117 parking spaces from one, 30-foot-wide access drive (97 from the shared parking for Hall Corporate Center and Ashram site and 20 from the daycare site). Vicinity Information: The site is bordered north and east by property zoned C-P and are currently developed with an office complex and a daycare center. The property to the south is zoned R-12 and developed with an apartment complex and the property to the west is zoned R-4.5 and developed with single-family residences. SWAMI VISWA PREMANANDA TEMPLE ADDITION PAGE 3 OF 23 CUP1999-00001/PDR1999-00002NAR1999-00024/MIS1999-00026 PLANNING COMMISSION FINAL ORDER NO.99-03PC Site Information and Proqosal Description: The Site is currently developed with a residential house. The proposal is to continue to use the existing residence as an Ashram (residential dormitory for Monks) and expand it for a total of 4,840 square feet to allow for 2 full-time residents bedrooms and 8 guestrooms. The proposal also involves the construction of a 9,000 square foot temple. The applicant is requesting Variance approval to allow additional parking spaces to be constructed off of a driveway that is already not in conformance with the required dimensions. They are also requesting an Adjustment to the front yard setback for a religious facility. SECTION IV. DECISION MAKING PROCEDURES, PERMITS AND USE: Use Classification: Section 18.130.020 is s e se ategories. The applicant is proposing to build a Temple (Religious Institution) and Ashram (Residential Dormitory Use�. The Religious Institution is a Conditional Use in the C-P zone and the residential use is not allowed unless it is part of a planned development. Summar Land Use Permits: Chapter 18.310 e ines e ecision-ma ing type to which the land-use application is assigned. The adjustment to the front yard setback is a Type I administrative decision. The Variance is a Ty�e II administrative decision. The proposed use (Religious Institution) rec�uires a Conditional Use permit which is a Type Ifl-HO decision. The requested living facilities (residential use) requires a planned development which is a Type III-PC decision. When applications are heard concurrently, the highest review authority hears all applications, therefore, all aspects of this application will be reviewed by the Planning Commission. Decision Makin Procedures: Chapter 18.390 escri es e ecision-ma ing procedures. Type III-PC procedures apply to quasi-judicial permits and actions that predominantly contain discretionary approval criteria. Type III-PC actions are decided by the Planning Commission with appeals to or review by the City Council. SECTION V. NEIGHBORHOOD COMMENTS No comments were received from surrounding property owners. SECTION VI. SUMMARY OF APPLICABLE CRITERIA A summary of the applicable criteria in this case in the Chapter order in which they are addressed in this report are as follows: A. S ecific Conditional Use Criteria enera pp rova riteria Additional Conditions of Approval) B. lanned Develo ment Standards rocess Specific Planned Development Criteria C. A licable Develo ment Code Standards . ariances an �us men s 18.705 (Access, Egress & Circulation) 18.745 Landscaping and Screening) 18.765 Off-Street Parking and Loading Requirements) 18.790 Tree Removal) 18.795 (Visual Clearance) 18.810 (Street and Utiliry Improvement Standards) D. Additional Planned Development Criteria SWAMI VISWA PREMANANDA TEMPLE ADDITION PAGE 4 OF 23 CUP1999-00001/PDR1999-00002NAR1999-00024/MIS1999-00026 PLANNING COMMISSION FINAL ORDER NO.99-03PC SECTION VII. APPLICABLE REVIEW CRITERIA AND FINDINGS Impact Study: Section 18.390.040.B.2.e states that the applicant shall provide an impact study to quantify the effect of development on public facilities and services. For each public facility system and type of impact, the study shall propose improvements necessary to meet City standards, and to minimize the impact of the development on the public at large, public facilities systems, and affected private property users. In situations where the Community Development Code requires the dedication of real propertx interests, the applicant shall either specifically concur with a requirement for public right-of-way dedicat�on, or provide evidence that suppurts that the real property dedication is not roughly proportional to the projected impacts of the development. Any required street improvements to certain collector or higher volume streets and the Washington County Traffic Impact Fee (TIF) are mitigation measures that are required at the time of development. Based on a transportation impact study prepared by Mr. David Larson for the A-Boy Expansion/Dolan II/Resolution 95-61, TIF's are expected to recapture 32 percent of the traffic impact of new development on the Collector and Arterial Street system. ' The applicant is being required to dedicate right-of-way to allow an ultimate right-of-way width of 45 feet (approximately 20 feet of right-of-way). The Engineering Department has estimated the right-of-way acquisition to be approximately $3 per square foot. It is estimated, therefore, that the value of land being dedicated is $1,920. Upon completion of this development, the applicant will be required to pay TIF's of approximately $12,461. Based on the estimate that total TIF fees cover 32 percent of the impact on ma�or street improvements citywide, a fee that would cover 100 percent of this proJects traffic impact is $38,940 ($12,461 divided by. .32). The difference between the TIF paid and the full impact, is considered an unmitigated impact. Since the TIF paid is $12,461, the unmitigated impact can be valued at $26,479. Given the estimated cost of the half-street improvement and the unmitigated impact, the dedication requirement meets the rough proportionality test related to the impact of the development. A. SPECIFIC CONDITIONAL USE APPROVAL CRITERIA Section 18.330.010.A states that the purpose of this chapter is to provide standards and procedures under which a conditional use may be permitted, enlarged or altered if the site is appropriate and if other appropriate conditions of approval can be met. There are certain uses which due to the nature of the im pacts on surrounding land uses and public facilities require a case-by-case review and analysis. Section 18.330.020.A states that a request for approval for a new conditional use shall be processed as a Type III-HO procedure, as regulated by Chapter 18.390.050, using apProval criteria contained in Section 18.330.030A and subject to other requirements in Chapter 18.330. The applicable review criteria in this case include the following chapters of the Community Development Code: 18.330, Conditional Use; 18.350, Planned Development; 18.370, Variances and AdJ'ustments; 18.390 Decision Making Procedures;18.520, Commercial Zoning Districts, 18.530, 18.705, Access, Egress and Circulation; 18.745, Landscaping and Screening; 18.765, Off-Street Parking; 18.790, Tree Removal; 18.795, Visual Clearance Areas; and 18.810, Street and Utilify Improvement Standards. The development standards and requirements of these chapters are addressed below. The proposal contains no elements related to the provisions of the followin� chapters: 18.600, Community Plan Area Standards; 18.710, Accessory Residential Units; 18.715, Density Computations; 18.720, Design Compatibility Standards; 18.725, Environmental Performance Standards; 18.730, Exceptions to Development Standard; 18.740, Historic Overlay; 18.742, Home Occupations; 18.750, Manufactured/Mobile Home Regulations; 18.760, Nonconforming Situations; 18.775, Sensitive Lands; 18.780, Temporary Uses; 18.797, Water Resources Overlay District; and 18.798, Wireless Communications Facilities. These chapters are, therefore, found to be inapplicable as approval standards. SWAMI VISWA PREMANANDA TEMPLE ADDITION PAGE 5 OF 23 CUP1999-00001/PDR1999-00002NAR1999-00024/MIS1999-00026 PLANNING COMMISSION FINAL ORDER NO.99-03PC i General Approval Criteria for a Conditional Use: Section 18.330.030: � The site size and dimensions provide adequate area for the needs of the proposed use; The existing site size is 2.25 acres. This report evaluates the proposal and necessary setbacks, landscaping, etc. and as conditioned, the site size is adequate for the needs of the proposed expansion. The characteristics of the site are suitable for the proposed use considering size, shape, location, topography, and natural features; The site is relatively flat. There are trees on the site, but the development has been situated in such a way as to preserve the existing trees. All required public facilities have adequate capacity to serve the proposal; and All public facilities including streets, storm and sanitary sewers, and water have adequate capacity to serve the site as discussed in detail elsewhere in this report. The applicable requirements of the zoning district are met except as modified by this chapter. The following table provides the dimensional standards in the C-P zone, the additional dimensional requirements and approval standards for Religious Institutions specified The Conditional Use Standards Section 18.330.050.6.16 and the dimensions proposed for this development. STANDARD C-P CONDITIONAL USE PROPOSED REQUIREMENT Minimum Lot Size 6,000 sq.ft. 20,000 sq.ft 104,301 sq.ft Minimum Lot Width 50 ft. SAME AS C-P 190'approx.[3] Minimum Setbacks O ft. 25 ft 20 ft."` - Front yard - Side facing street on comer&through lots --- 20 ft N/A - Side yard 0/20 ft[1�. 20 ft 20 ft"' - Rear yard - Side of rear yard abutting more restrictive zoning district 0/20 ft[1]. 20 ft 55 ft"' - Distance between property line and garage entrance Maximum Height 45 ft. SAME AS C-P 23 ft.approx.[3] Maximum Site Coverage[2] 85% SAME AS C-P 36% approx.[3] Minimum Landscape Requirement 15°/a SAME AS C-P 64% approx.[3] [1] No setback shall be required except 20 feet shall be required where the zone abuts a residential zoning district (2� Includes all buildings and impervious surfaces. [3] Approximate figures are provided where the applicanYs information is not clear or accuracy is questioned. In these instances, more discussion and detail is provided further in this report. "'" Dimensions specified on plans. Upon scaling, however,distances appear to be less. This is discussed in more detail further in this report. As identified in the table above, the applicanYs plans show that the dimensional standa�ds for the base zone are met. The applicant is requesting an adjustment to the front yard setback dimensions required in the Conditional Use standards. This is discussed further in this report. The applicanYs plans do not provide enough clear information for staff to state exactly what the dimensions are because the applicant has included dimensions for the SWAMI VISWA PREMANANDA TEMPLE ADDITION PAGE 6 OF 23 CUP1999-00001/PDR1999-00002NAR1999-00024/MIS1999-00026 PLANNING COMMISSION FINAL ORDER NO.99-03PC office park to the north, however, the difference between the approximate amount and the required amount is so great that staff feels confident the standards are met. A condition of approval should be imposed, however, that requires the applicant to submit detailed information on the size of the site (in square feet), the impervious surface on the site and the landscaped area for the site. In addition, the setback dimensions are also in question because they do not scale off to the dimensions shown. The supplementary requirements set forth in other chapter of this Code including but not limited to Chapter 18.780, Signs, and Chapter 18.360, Site Development Review, if applicable, are met. Other applicable standards of the development code are discussed later in this report. The use will comply with the applicable policies of the Comprehensive Plan. The Comprehensive Plan is implemented by the Community Development Code. Compliance with Comprehensive Plan policies are, therefore, assured by satisfaction of the applicable development standards of the development code as addressed within this report. FINDING: Based on the analysis above, staff can not make a final determination that the General Approval Criteria for a Conditional Use are satisfied. If the applicant complies with the following conditions, staff can find that the standards are met or will be addressed further in this report and conditioned if necessary. CONDITIONS: • Submit a revised plan the clearly states the site size, the amount of impervious surface and the amount of landscaped area on the subject site alone. . Submit a revised plan showing setback dimensions that scales accurately. Additional Conditions of Approval for Conditional Use. Section 18.330.030.B states that the Hearings Authority may impose conditions on the approval of a conditional use, which are found nece5sary to ensure the use is compatible with other uses in the vicinity, and that the impact of the proposed use on the surrounding uses and public facilities is minimized. These conditions may include, but are not limited to the following: Limiting the hours, days, place and/or manner of operation; Due to the nature of the use, it is anticipated that the majority of activity will take place on the weekends. However, given that the use shares an access and parking with an office complex, it is recommended to limit the hours of worship to after 6:00 PM Mondays through Fridays with the exception of legal holidays. It is acknowledged that some activities associated with a religious institution may take place during the workweek, however, it is � important that formal worship services be scheduled with consideration of surrounding uses, and traffic and parking demands. Requiring design features which minimize environmental impacts such as noise, vibration, air pollution, glare, odor and/or dust; There will be no noise, vibration, air pollution, glare, odor and/or dust associated with this use above and beyond what is found in an office type use which is permitted in the underlying zone. In any event, the applicant has proposed buffering and screening between the adjacent residential uses. Requiring additional setback areas, lot area, and/or lot depth or width; Staff feels the existing buffer requirements, as discussed further in this report, are adequate. SWAMI VISWA PREMANANDA TEMPLE ADDITION PAGE 7 OF 23 . CUP1999-00001/PDR1999-00002NAR1999-00024/MIS1999-00026 PLANNING COMMISSION FINAL ORDER NO.99-03PC Limiting the building height, size or lot coverage, and/or location on the site; Based on the plans submitted, the structures will comply with the height requirements and lot coverage requirements. The location is in accordance with the setbacks, provided the adjustment request is approved. Because of this, staff does not feel an additional condition is necessary. Designating the size, number, location and/or design of vehicle access points; Staff does not feel a condition is necessary for this criteria since, as discussed further in this report, vehicle access is already limited. Requiring street right-of-way to be dedicated and street(s) to be improved; The applicant has approximately 32 feet of frontage on SW Hall Boulevard. The right-of-way is not to the required width of 45 feet from centerline, therefore, the applicant will be required to dedicate additional right-of-way. This is discussed further under Street Utility and Improvement Standards. Requiring landscaping, screening, drainage and/or surfacing of. parking and loading areas; The majority of parking is existing. The applicant has proposed to construct 5 additional parking spaces, however, the buildings will be located between any new parking and the adjacent residential areas. The ability to provide additional parking is discussed in detail under the Variance discussion section. Limiting the number, size, location, height and/or lighting of signs; Signs have not been indicated as proposed, however, compliance with the sign requirements for the underlying zone should be sufficient in the event that signs are desired. Limiting or setting standards for the location and/or intensity of outdoor lighting; The applicant has not provided a lighting plan. Because of this, a condition is warranted requiring the applicant to submit a lighting plan indicating the location and intensity of the lighting to be provided. The applicant will be required to submit details of the lighting plan indicating that the light will be directed away from residential properties. Requiring berms, screening or landscaping and the establishment of standards for their installation and maintenance; Buffering and screening is discussed further in this report. Because the use proposed is no more intensive than other uses permitted in this zone, staff does not feel that additional screening, above and beyond what is already required, is necessary. Requiring and designating the size, height, location and/or materials for fences; No fences are proposed. Requiring the protection and preservation of existing trees, soils, vegetation, watercourses, habitat areas and/or drainage areas; No trees will be removed as a result of this proposal and there are no watercourses, habitat areas or drainage areas on the site. Requiring the dedication of sufficient open land area for a greenway adjoining and within the floodplain when land form alterations and development are allowed within the 100-year floodplain; and SWAMI VISWA PREMANANDA TEMPLE AODITION PAGE 8 OF 23 CUP1999-00001/PDR1999-00002NAR1999-00024/MIS1999-00026 PLANNING COMMISSION FINAL ORDER NO.99-03PC This development is not adjacent to the 100-year floodplain, therefore, a condition is not necessary. Requiring the construction of a pedestrian/bicycle pathway within the floodplain in accordance with the adopted pedestrian/bicycle pathway plan. This development is not adjacent to the 100-year floodplain, therefore, a condition is not necessary. FINDING: Based on the analysis above, staff finds the following conditions are warranted by this Conditional Use approval: All other conditions listed are not necessary or will be addressed elsewhere m this report. CONDITIONS: . Submit a lighting plan indicating the location and intensity of the lighting to be �rovided. The applicant shall submit details of the lighting plan indicating that he light will be directed away from residential properties. . Hours of operation shall be limited to prohibit worship services from being held before 6:00 PM, Mondays through Fridays with the exception of legal holidays. B. PLANNED DEVELOPMENT APPROVAL CRITERIA Planned Development (18.350): ap er � a ows e option for an applicant to create a more efficient, economically viable development that preserves natural land features while implementin� the land use designation set forth for the property though the . Comprehensive Plan. Section 18.350.020.B states that the Planned Development Review is a three (3)-step process, as follows: 1. The approval of the planned development overlay zone; 2. The approval of the Planned development concept plan; and 3. The approval of the Detailed Development Plan. The applicant has requested that this application be for Planned Development Overlay Designation, Conceptual Planned Development and Detailed Planned Development approval to comply with all three steps in the PD process. FINDING: Because this proposal requested all three steps and this report evaluates the proposal for compliance with all standards required to be evaluated, this standard has been met. Allowed Uses: ec ion . .060.6 states that in all commercial zones, an applicant with a planned development approval may develop the site to contain all of the uses permitted outright in the underlying zone and, in addition, a maximum of 25% of the total gross floor area may be used for multi-family dwellings in those commercial zones that do not list multi-family dwellings as an outright use. The total square footage for all structures will be 13,840 square feet, therefore, only 3,460 square feet is permitted to be used for living areas. The floor plan shown for the Ashram has several areas dedicated for worship, yoga and other group facilities. The applicant has not provided enough detail for staff to confirm that the total living area (guestrooms) will be less than 3,460 square feet. SWAMI VISWA PREMANANDA TEMPLE ADDITION PAGE 9 OF 23 CUP1999-00001/PDR1999-00002JVAR1999-00024/MIS1999-00026 PLANNING COMMISSION FINAL ORDER NO.99-03PC FINDING: Because the applicant has not provided enough detail for staff to confirm'that the total living area (guest rooms) will be less than 3,460 square feet, this standard has not been met. If the applicant submits a floor plan that shows the total area dedicated for living facilities (guest rooms and resident's rooms) will be less than 3,460 square feet, this standard will be met. CONDITION:Submit a floor plan that shows the total area dedicated for living facilities (guest rooms and resident's rooms) will be less than 3,460 square feet. Specific Planned Development Approval Criteria. The Commission shall make findings that the following criteria are satisfied when approving or approving with conditions, the concept plan. The Commission shall make findings that the criteria are not satisfied when denying an application. All the provisions of the land division provisions, Chapters 18.410, 18.420 and 18.430, shall be met; This proposal does not involve a division of land, therefore, this standard does not apply. Except as noted, the provisions of the following chapters shall be utilized as guidelines. A planned development need not meet these requirements where a development plan provides alternative designs and methods, if acceptable to the Commission, that promote the purpose of this section. In each case, the applicant must provide findings to justify the modification of the standards in the chapters listed in Subsection 3 below. The developer may choose to provide or the commission may require additional open space dedication and/or provision of additional amenities, landscaping or tree planting. Chapter 18.730, Exceptions to Development Standards; Chapter 18.795, Visual Clearance Areas; Chapter 18.745, Landscaping and Screening; Chapter 18.765, Off-street Parking and Loading Requirements; Chapter 18.705, Access, Egress and Circulation; and Chapter 18.780, Signs. Compliance with this standard is discussed, and conditioned as necessary in the following section: APPLICABLE DEVELOPMENT CODE STANDARDS. C. APPLICABLE DEVELOPMENT CODE STANDARDS Variances and Adiustments (18.370) Variance to the access width: The Director may approve, approve with conditions, or deny a request for an adjustment from the access requirements contained in Chapter 18.705, based on the following criteria: It is not possible to share access; The applicant has requested Variance approval to allow the construction of 5 additional parking spaces to take access off of an existing 30-foot-wide driveway that serves over 100 vehicles. The Code requires that when more than 99 parking spaces are provided, two, 30-foot-wide access drives or one, 50-foot-wide access drive must be provided. When the adjacent office complex (Hall Corporate Center) was constructed, a Variance was approved to the access width. Parking spaces were constructed on the subject site and a joint parking agreement signed to share parking between this site and the Hall Corporate Center with that previous approval. At that time, the property to the north was owned by a separate individual. The property to the north of the access drive is now owned by owners of the Hall Corporate Center. The applicant has indicated that it is not possible to share an access because the property owner to the north has not agreed to allow additional land to be dedicated for the additional access width. Staff does not agree with this because the Hall Corporate Center has recently submitted an application to construct a parking lot on the property to the north of the access drive. While their proposal does not involve increasing the access width, staff has informed them that a variance will not be approved and additional SWAMI VISWA PREMANANDA TEMPLE ADDITION PAGE 10 OF 23 CUP1999-00001/PDR1999-00002NAR1999-00024/MIS1999-00026 PLANNING COMMISSION FINAL ORDER NO.99-03PC � parking spaces will not be permitted unless the required widt�� s provided. Because the property to the north will be required to provide the additional access width in order to develop their parking lot, staff can not state that this request does not need to comply with the same standards. There are no other alternative access points on the street in question or from another street; Because all the surrounding property is developed, there are no alternative access points to the site. The access separation requirements cannot be met; This standard does not apply because the requested variance does not involve access separation. The request is the minimum adjustment required to provide adequate access; The applicant has access to parking via existing spaces on-site and the shared parking with the Hall Corporate Center. The existing parking is sufficient to serve the proposed use, therefore, adding 5 additional parking spaces is not necessary. The approved access or access approved with conditions will result in a safe access; and Staff does not feel that allowing additional parking spaces to be added to an access drive that is already narrower than the Code allows is safe. Part of the reasoning for multiple or wider access drives is to provide access for emergency vehicles. Because the applicant is only proposing 5 additional parking spaces, and with the shared parking there is already sufficient parking to serve the proposed use, staff does not feel that it is necessary to make a bad situation any worse. The visual clearance requirements of Chapter 18.795 will be met. The visual clearance standards will continue to be met. FINDING: Based on the analysis above, staff finds that the variance criteria have not been met. In order to find that the proposal can be approved without the variance, the applicant must submit a revised plan that shows the 5 proposed parking spaces deleted from the site plan OR the access drive must be widened to provide, at minimum, a 40-foot pavement width. CONDITION:Submit a revised plan that shows the 5 proposed parking spaces deleted from the site plan OR the access drive must be widened to provide, at minimum, a 40-foot pavement width. Adjustment to the Front Yard Setback: Up to a 25% reduction of the dimensional standards for the front yard setback required in the base zone may be approved by means of a Type I procedure, as governed by Section 18.390.030, using approval criteria contained in Subsection 62 below: A demonstration that the adjustment requested is the least required to achieve the desired affect; The adjustment will result in the preservation of trees, if trees are present in the development area; The adjustment will not impede adequate emergency access to the site; There is not a reasonable alternative to the adjustment which achieves the desired affect. SWAMI VISWA PREMANANDA TEMPLE ADD�TION PAGE 11 OF 23 CUP1999-00001/PDR1999-00002NAR1999-00024/MIS1999-00026 PLANNING COMMISSION FINAL ORDER NO.99-03PC The applicant has requested an Adjustment to the front yard setback required for a Conditional Use. The Conditional Use standards require a 25-foot setback for Religious Institutions, whereas, the applicant has requested the setback be 20 feet. The front yard setback is adjacent to the existing daycare which is zoned C-P as well. It makes sense to allow this adjustment given that the setback will not be detrimental to another persons privacy or property rights. The reduced setback will not impede adequate emergency access to the site. Staff feels that, given that this is being reviewed as part of a Planned Development which allows flexibility, and that the adjacent property is zoned and developed commercial, that this Adjustment is reasonable and should be approved. � FINDING: Based on the analysis above, staff finds that the front yard setback adjustment is acceptable. Access, Eqress and Circulation: Walkways: On-site pedestrian walkways shall comply with the following standards: Walkways shall extend from the ground floor entrances or from the ground floor landing of stairs, ramps, or elevators of all commercial, institutional, and industrial uses, to the streets which provide the required access and egress. Walkways shall provide convenient connections between buildings in multi-building commercial, institutional, and industrial complexes. Unless impractical, walkways shall be constructed between new and existing developments and neighboring developments; There is an existing walkway along the access drive and there is a walkway proposed from the parking lots to the proposed structures. There is not; however, a clearly marked connection between the 2 walkways across the parking lot. A condition is necessary to insure that this is provided. Wherever required walkways cross vehicle access driveways or parking lots, such crossings shall be designed and located for pedestrian safety. Required walkways shall be physically separated from motor vehicle traffic and parking by either a minimum 6-inch vertical separation (curbed) or a minimum 3-foot horizontal separation, except that pedestrian crossings of traffic aisles are permitted for distances no greater than 36 feet if appropriate landscaping, pavement markings, or contrasting pavement materials are used. Walkways shall be a minimum of four feet in width, exclusive of vehicle overhangs and obstructions such as mailboxes, benches, bicycle racks, and sign posts, and shall be in compliance with ADA standards; and The applicant, as conditioned above, will be required to provide a clearly marked walkway across the parking lot to connect the existing and proposed walkway. By complying with this condition, this standard will be satisfied. Required walkways shall be paved with hard surfaced materials such as concrete, asphalt, stone, brick, etc. Walkways may be required to be lighted and/or signed as needed for safety purposes. Soft-surfaced public use pathways may be provided only if such pathways are provided in addition to required pathways. The plans indicate that the proposed walkway will be concrete. Minimum Access Requirements for Commercial and Industrial Use: Section 18.705.030.1 provides the minimum access requirements for commercial and industrial uses: Table 18.705.3 indicates that the required access width for developments with more than 100 parking spaces is one 50-foot-wide access with a 40-foot pavement width or two 30-foat-wide access points with 24 feet of pavement. Vehicular access shall be provided to commercial or industrial uses, and shall be located to within 50 feet of the primary ground floor entrances; additional requirements for truck traffic may be placed as conditions of site development review. SWAMI VISWA PREMANANDA TEMPLE ADDITION PAGE 12 OF 23 CUP1999-00001/PDR1999-00002NAR1999-00024/MIS1999-00026 PLANNING COMMISSION FINAL ORDER NO.99-03PC The'access is only 30 feet and serves over 100 cars. This was approved by a Variance as part of a previous application. The applicant has requested a Variance to allow more parking off of this driveway. As discussed, staff has recommended against this request. Director's Authority to Restrict Access: Section 18.705.030.K states that in order to eliminate the need to use public streets for movements between commercial and industrial properties, parking areas shall be designed to connect with parking areas on adjacent properties unless not feasible. The Director shall require access easements between properties where necessary to provide for parking area connections. The site already has shared parking and access, therefore, this standard is satisfied. FINDING: Based on the analysis above, staff finds that the access and egress standards are not satisfied, however, if the applicant complies with the condition below, this standard will be met. CONDITION: Submit a revised plan that shows a clearly marked walkway across the access drive/parking lot connecting the existing sidewalk and the proposed sidewalk. Landscapinq and Screeninq — Chapter 18.745: Street trees: Section 1$.745.040 states that all development projects fronting on a public street shall be required to plant street trees in accordance with Section 18.745.040.0 Section 18.745.040.0 required that street trees be spaced between 20 and 40 feet apart depending on the size classification of the tree at maturity (small, medium or large). The property has no street frontage other than the access drive, therefore, this standard can not be applied. Land Use Buffering and Screening: Section 18.745.080 requires that at a minimum the buffer between a proposed Commercial use and residential use must contain a 10-20 foot buffer with trees, lawn/groundcover, shrubs, and screening. The property to the west is zoned and developed with existing single-family residential homes. The applicant must, therefore, provide for a buffer based on the matrix in Table 18.745.2. The applicanYs plans show the building will be set back 55 feet from the western property line and landscaping is provided with a laurel hedge, cedar trees and lawn, which provides the most stringent screening option (Level F). Screening - Special Provisions: Section 18.745.050.E requires the screening of parking and loading areas. Landscaped parking areas shall include special design features which effectively screen the parking lot areas from view. Planting materials to be installed should achieve a relative balance between low lying and vertical shrubbery and trees. Trees shall be planted in landscaped islands in all parking areas, and shall be equally distributed on the basis of one (1) tree for each seven (7) parking spaces in order to provide a canopy effect. The minimum dimension on the landscape islands shall be three (3) feet wide and the landscaping shall be protected from vehicular damage by some form of wheel guard or curb. The majority of the parking is existing. The applicant has proposed 5 additional parking spaces which, if the access drive is widened and the spaces are permitted, will have the required screening. FINDING: Based on the analysis above, the landscaping and screening standards have been fully met. SWAMI VISWA PREMANANDA TEMPLE ADDITION PAGE 13 OF 23 , CUP1999-00001/PDR1999-00002NAR1999-00024/MIS1999-00026 PLANNING COMMISSION FINAL ORDER NO.99-03PC Off-Street Parkinq and Loading (18.765): Disabled-Accessible Parking: All parking areas shall be provided with the required number of parking spaces for disabled persons as specified by the State of Oregon Uniform Building Code and federal standards. Such parking spaces shall be sized, signed and marked as required by these regulations. The majority of parking is existing and the proposed parking spaces, which were intended to be ADA accessible, are not approved unless the access drive is widened. The applicant must, however, provide for ADA accessible spaces to the new structures. The amount of spaces required is based on the number of spaces on this site alone (22 spaces), therefore, one (1) additional ADA space is needed. Access Drives: With regard to access to public streets from off-street parking: access drives from the street to off-street parking or loading areas shall be designed and constructed to facilitate the flow of traffic and provide maximum safety for pedestrian and vehicular traffic on the site; the number and size of access drives shall be in accordance with the requirements of Chapter, 18.705, Access, Egress and Circulation; access drives shall be clearly and permanently marked and defined through use of rails, fences, walls or other barriers or markers on frontage not occupied by service drives; access drives shall have a minimum vision clearance in accordance with Chapter 18.795, Visual Clearance; access drives shall be improved with an asphalt or concrete surface; and excluding single-family and duplex residences, except as provided by Subsection 18.810.030.P, groups of two or more parking spaces shall be served by a service drive so that no backing movements or other maneuvering within a street or other public right-of-way will be required. The access drive to the site is existing. As discussed previously, the dimensions are non- conforming based on the number of parking spaces. Provided they do not increase the parking spaces already approved, the driveway dimension is acceptable as it has been approved by a previous Variance. Parking Lot Striping: Except for single-family and duplex residences, any area intended to be used to meet the off-street parking requirements as contained in this Chapter shall have all parking spaces clearly marked; and all interior drives and access aisles shall be clearly marked and signed to show direction of flow and maintain vehicular and pedestrian safety. The parking lot is existing and parking spaces are clearly marked, therefore, this standard is satisfied. Wheel Stops: Parking spaces along the boundaries of a parking lot or adjacent to interior landscaped areas or sidewalks shall be provided with a wheel stop at least four inches high located three feet back from the front of the parking stall. The front three feet of the parking stall may be concrete, asphalt or low lying landscape material that does not exceed the height of the wheel stop. This area cannot be calculated to meet landscaping or sidewalk requirements. The existing parking area has curbs along the perimeter. There is bark dust adjacent to the parking area that meets the low lying landscape requirement, therefore, this standard is satisfied. SWAMI VISWA PREMANANDA TEMPLE ADDITION PAGE 14 OF 23 . CUP1999-00001/PDR1999-00002NAR1999-00024/MIS1999-00026 PLANNING COMMISSION FINAL ORDER NO.99-03PC Space and Aisle Dimensions: Section 18.765.040.N states that: "except as modified for angled parking in Figures 18.765.1 and 18.765.2 the minimum dimensions for parking spaces are: 8.5' x 18.5' for a standard space and 7.5' x 16.5' for a compact space; aisles accommodating two direction traffic, or allowing access from both ends, shall be 24 feet in width. The parking spaces are existing, therefore, this standard does not apply. Bicycle Parking Location and Access: Section 18.765.050 states bicycle parking areas shall be provided at locations within 50 feet of primary entrances to structures; bicycle parking areas shall not be located within parking aisles, landscape areas or pedestrian ways; outdoor bicycle parking shall be visible from on-site buildings and/or the street. VlOhen the bicycle parking area is not visible from the street, directional signs shall be used to located the parking area; and bicycle parking may be located inside a building on a floor which has an outdoor entrance open for use and floor location which does not require the bicyclist to use stairs to gain access to the space. Exceptions may be made to the latter requirement for parking on upper stories within a multi-story residential building. The proposed bicycle rack is within 50 feet of the entrance Ashram and is not located in parking aisles, landscape areas or pedestrian ways. Bicycle Parking Design Requirements: Section 18.765.050.C. The following design requirements apply to the installation of bicycle racks: The racks required for required bicycle parking spaces shall ensure that bicycles may be securely locked to them without undue inconvenience. Provision of bicycle lockers for long-term (employee) parking is encouraged but not required; bicycle racks must be securely anchored to the ground, wall or other structure; bicycle parking spaces shall be at least 2�/z feet by six feet long, and, when covered, with a vertical clearance of seven feet. An access aisle of at least five feet wide shall be provided and maintained beside or between each row of bicycle parking; each required bicycle parking space must be accessible without moving another bicycle; required bicycle parking spaces may not be rented or leased except where required motor vehicle parking is rented or leased. At-cost or deposit fees for bicycle parking are exempt from this requirement; and areas set aside for required bicycle parking must be clearly reserved for bicycle parking only. Outdoor bicycle parking facilities shall be surfaced with a hard surfaced material, i.e., pavers, asphalt, concrete or similar material. This surface must be designed to remain well drained. The applicant has not provided detail of the bicycle parking rack, therefore, staff can not determine if this standard has been met. If the applicant submits a detail of the bicycle rack, staff will be able to review it to insure that the design complies with the standards of the Code. Minimum Bicycle Parking Requirements: The total number of required bicycle parking spaces for each use is specified in Table 18.768.2 in Section 18.765.070.H. In no case shall there be less than two bicycle parking spaces. Table 18.768.2 states that for Religious Institutions, one (1) bicycle parking space is required for every 20 seats in the main assembly area. The applicant has indicated that there will be up to 178 chairs in the main assembly, therefore, nine (9) bicycle parking spaces are required. The applicant has indicated that six (6) bicycle parking spaces will be provided. The applicant must revise the plan to provide three (3) additional bicycle parking spaces. Minimum Off-Street Parking: Section 18.765.070.H states that the minimum and maximum parking shall be as required in Table 18.765.2. SWAMI VISWA PREMANANDA TEMPLE ADDITION PAGE 15 OF 23 , CUP1999-00001/PDR1999-00002NAR1999-00024/MIS1999-00026 PLANNING COMMISSION FINAL ORDER NO.99-03PC Table 18.765.2 states that the minimum parking for a Religious Institution is one (1) space for every two (2) seats. Because up to 178 seats will be provided in the main assembly area, 89 parking spaces are required. There are 22 parking spaces in this site and 74 on the adjacent site with which the applicant has a shared parking agreement. Because the total number of spaces available is 96 and the uses are compatible in that the peak hours do not overlap, this standard has been satisfied. In addition, a condition recommended as part of the Conditional Use approval will insure that no worship services are scheduled during the "normal" office hours. FINDING: Based on the analysis above, the off-street parking and loading standards have been met. CONDITIONS: . Submit a revised plan that shows one (1) van accessible handicap space will be provided that includes a 9-foot-wide space with an 8-foot-wide aisle in front of the proposed development. . Submit a detail of the bicycle rack. . Submit a revised plan that shows three (3) additional bicycle parking spaces will be provided. Tree Removal — Chapter 18.790 Section 18.790.030 requires that a tree plan for the planting, removal and protection of trees prepared by a certified arborist be provided for a conditional use application. The tree plan shall include identification of all existing trees, Identification of a program to save existing trees or mitigate tree removal over 12 inches in caliper, identification of which trees are proposed to be removed, and a protection program defining standards and methods that will be used by the applicant to protect trees during and after construction. The applicant's plans do not show any trees will be removed, therefore, this standard does not apply. FINDING: Because the applicant has not proposed to remove and trees, this standard has been met. Visual Clearance Areas — Chapter 18.795: Section 18.795.020.A. states that the provisions of this chapter shall apply to all development including the construction of new structures, the remodeling of existing structures and to a change of use which increases the on-site parking or loading requirements or which changes the access requirements. Section 18.795.030.B. states that a clear vision area shall contain no vehicle, hedge, planting, fence, wall structure or temporary or permanent obstruction (except for an occasional utility pole or tree), exceeding three feet in height, measured from the top of the curb, or where no curb exists, from the street center line grade, except that trees exceeding this height may be located in this area, provided all branches below eight feet are removed. There are no proposed structures inside of the vision clearance area, therefore, this standard is satisfied. FINDING: Based on the analysis above, the standards of Chapter 18.795, Visual Clearance Areas have been met. SWAMI VISWA PREMANANDA TEMPLE ADDITION PAGE 16 OF 23 CUP1999-00001/PDR1999-00002NAR1999-00024/MIS1999-00026 PLANNING COMMISSION FINAL ORDER NO.99-03PC Street And Utilitv Improvements Standards - Chapter 18.810: Chapter 18.810 provides construction standards for the implementation of public and private facilities and utilities such as streets, sewers, and drainage. The applicable standards are addressed below: Streets: Improvements: Section 18.810.030.A.1 states that streets within a development and streets adjacent shall be improved in accordance with the Tigard Development Code (TDC) standards. Section 18.810.030.A.2 states that any new street or additional street width planned as TDCrtion of an existing street shall be dedicated and improved in accordance with the Minimum Rights-of-Way and Street Widths: Section 18.810.030(E) requires an arterial street to have a 60 to 90 right-of-way width and 12-foot lanes. Other improvements required may include on-street parking, sidewalks and bikeways, underground utilities, street lighting, storm drainage, and street trees. This site lies adjacent to SW Hall Boulevard, which is classified as an arterial on the City of Tigard Transportation Plan Map, and is under the jurisdiction of the Oregon Department of Transportation (ODOT). At present, there is approximatel 60 feet of ROW accordin to the most recent tax assessor's map. This roadway will even�ually be widened to have � lanes with bike lanes. This type of, roadway will require the full 90-foot ROW. Therefore, the applicant should dedicate additional ROW along this frontage to provide 45 feet from the centerline. SW Hall Boulevard is currently improved with a centerline-to-curb dimension of approximately 25 feet. This is an interim width approved by ODOT. There is an existing driveway apron that serves the site and other ad�acent uses (Kindercare and Hall Park Office). ODOT submitted comments, dated November 1, 1999, to the City with regard to this project. ODOT is concerned about the current width of the shared access into this site. Of particular concern is the potential for vehicles intending to enter the Kindercare site backing up into Hall Boulevard due to queuing of exiting cars biocking the Kindercare access. 060T believes the access should be widened to provide for three lanes to help alleviate this potential problem. In addition, ODOT recommends the City require the applicant to schedule their peak traffic into this site such that there is no conflict with the peak traffic periods generated by the Kindercare and Hall Park Office sites. These two issues will be covered in more detail in the Planning Department section of this report, under Section 18.705, Access, Egress, and Circulation. Sidewalks: Section 18.810.070.A requires that sidewalks be constructed to meet City design standards and be located on both sides of arterial, collector and local residential streets. There is an existing sidewalk along the frontage of SW Hall Boulevard adjacent to this site. No further sidewalk improvements are necessary. Sanitary Sewers: Sewers Required: Section 18.810.090.A requires that sanitary sewer be installed to serve each new development and to connect developments to existing mains in accordance with the provisions set forth in Design and Construction Standards for Sanitary and Surface Water Management (as adopted by the Unified Sewerage Agency in 1996 and including any future revisions or amendments) and the adopted policies of the comprehensive plan. Over-Sizin�: Section 18.810.090.0 states that �roposed sewer systems shall include consideration of additional development within the area as projected by the Comprehensive Plan. SWAMI VISWA PREMANANDA TEMPLE ADDITION PAGE 17 OF 23 CUP1999-00001/PDR1999-00002NAR1999-00024/MIS1999-00026 PLANNING COMMISSION FINAL ORDER NO.99-03PC 1 Sanitary sewer service for this site has been provided as a part of the Hall Park Office development. A 3-inch pressure line was installed within the shared driveway aisle and ties into the existing public sewer line in SW Hall Boulevard. The pressure sewer line is necessary due to the fact that this site is at a lower elevation that what the public line in Hall Boulevard can serve. The new building on this site must be constructed to have a sewer pump system. No further public sewer improvements are necessary. Storm Drainage: General Provisioris: Section 18.810.100.A states requires developers to make adequate provisions for storm water and flood water runoff. Accommodation of Upstream Drainage: Section 18.810.100.0 states that a culvert or other drainage facility shall be large enough to accommodate potential runoff from its entire upstream drainage area, whether inside or outside the development. The City Engineer shall approve the necessary size of the facility, based on the provisions of Design and Construction Standards for Sanitary and Surface Water Management (as adopted by the Unified Sewerage Agency in 1996 and including any future revisions or amendments). The Hall Park Office development lies uphill of this site. The majority of the storm water from that development was directed to the north toward the Highway 217 ROW. The drainage plan for this site should be able to accommodate any sheet flow that reaches this site from the wooded area north of the proposed building. Effect on Downstream Drainage: Section 18.810.100.D states that where it is anticipated by the City Engineer that the additional runoff resulting from the development will overload an existing drainage facility, the Director and Engineer shall withhold approval of the development until provisions have been made for improvement of the potential condition or until provisions have been made for storage of additional runoff caused by the development in accordance with the Design and Construction Standards for Sanitary and Surface Water Management (as adopted by the Unified Sewerage agency in 1996 and including any future revisions or amendments). In 1997, the Unified Sewerage Agency (USA) completed a basin study of Fanno Creek and adopted the Fanno Creek Watershed Management Plan. Section V of that plan includes a recommendation that local governments institute a stormwater detention/effective impervious area reduction program resulting in no net increase in storm peak flows up to the 25-year event. The City will require that all new developments resulting in an increase of impervious surfaces provide onsite detention facilities, unless the development is located adjacent to Fanno Creek. For those developments adjacent to Fanno Creek, the storm water runoff will be permitted to discharge without detention. The applicant's plan indicates that there will be a vegetated swale constructed adjacent to the southern boundary of the site. It is not clear whether the applicant intends for this facility to serve as a detention facility combined with surface water treatment. The applicant may need to adjust their storm drainage plan to accommodate the detention requirement. The plan also indicates that the storm water from this site will be directed to an existing storm drainage line that is located on the adjacent parcels to the east of this site. This existing private storm drainage line is located within an easement granted in favor of this site, as well as the Hall Park Office and Kindercare sites. This fact was discovered as a part of the approval for the Hall Park Office development. No public storm drainage work is necessary to support this development. SWAMI VISWA PREMANANDA TEMPLE ADDITION PAGE 18 OF 23 . CUP1999-00001/PDR1999-00002NAR1999-00024/MIS1999-00026 PLANNING COMMISSION FINAL ORDER NO.99-03PC I . � � uti�ities: Section 18.810.120 states that all utility lines, but not limited to those required for electric, communication, lighting and cable television services and related facilities shall be placed underground, except for surface mounted transformers, surface mounted connection boxes and meter cabinets which may be placed above ground, temporary utility service facilities during construction, high capacity electric lines operating at 50,000 volts or above, and: • The developer shall make all necessary arrangements with the serving utility to provide the underground services; • The City reserves the right to approve location of all surface mounted facilities; • All underground utilities, including sanitary sewers and storm drains installed in streets by the developer, shall be constructed prior to the surfacing of the streets; and • Stubs for service connections shall be long enough to avoid disturbing the street improvements when service connections are made. Exception to Under-Grounding Requirement: Section 18.810.120.0 states that a developer shall pay a fee in-lieu of under-grounding costs when the development is proposed to take place on a street where existing utilities which are not underground will serve the development and the approval authority determines that the cost and technical difficulty of under-grounding the utilities outweighs the benefit of under- grounding in conjunction with the development. The determination shall be on a case- by-case basis. The most common, but not the only, such situation is a short frontage development for which under-grounding would result in the placement of additional poles, rather than the removal of above-ground utilities facilities. An applicant for a development which is served by utilities which are not underground and which are located across a public right-of-way from the applicant's property shall pay a fee in- lieu of under-grounding. There are existing overhead utility lines along SW Hall Boulevard. If the fee in-lieu is proposed, it is equal to $27.50 per lineal foot of street frontage that contains the overhead lines. The frontage along this site is 32 lineal feet; therefore, the fee would be $880. ADDITIONAL CITY AND/OR AGENCY CONCERNS REGARDING STREET AND UTILITY IMPROVEMENT STANDARDS: Public Water System: This site lies within the Tualatin Valley Water District's (TVWD) service area. As a part of the Hall Park Office development, domestic and fire water lines were installed to serve both that project and this project. No additional public water line work will be necessary to support this development. Storm Water Quality: The City has agreed to enforce Surface Water Management (SWM) regulations established by the Unified Sewerage Agency (USA) Design and Construction Standards (adopted by Resolution and Order No. 96-44) which require the construction of on-site water quality facilities. The facilities shall be designed to remove 65 percent of the phosphorus contained in 100 percent of the storm water runoff generated from newly created impervious surfaces. In addition, a maintenance plan shall be submitted indicating the frequency and method to be used in keeping the facility maintained through the year. Prior to construction, the applicant shall submit plans and calculations for a water quality facility that will meet the intent of the USA Design Standards. In addition, the applicant shall submit a maintenance plan for the facility that must be reviewed and approved by the City ' prior to construction. SWAMI VISWA PREMANANDA TEMPLE ADDITION PAGE 19 OF 23 CUP1999-00001/PDR1999-00002NAR1999-00024/MIS1999-00026 PLANNING COMMISSION FINAL ORDER NO.99-03PC i As was stated above, the applicant is proposing to treat the onsite storm water runoff�in a vegetated swale. It appears that the site plan has allowed enough room for an adequately sized swale. To ensure compliance with Unified Sewerage Agency design and construction standards, the applicant shall employ the design engineer responsible for the design and specifications of the private water quality facility to perform construction and visual observation of the water quality facility for compliance with the design and specifications. These inspections shall be made at significant stages throughout the project and at completion of the construction. Prior to final building inspection, the design engineer shall provide the City of Tigard (Inspection Supervisor) with written confirmation that the water quality facility is in compliance with the design and specifications. Grading and Erosion Control: USA Design and Construction Standards also regulate erosion control to reduce the amount of sediment and other pollutants reaching the public storm and surface water system resulting from development, construction, grading, excavating, clearing, and any other activity which accelerates erosion. Per USA regulations, the applicant is required to submit an erosion control plan for City review and approval prior to issuance of City permits. Address Assignments: The City of Tigard is responsible for assigning addresses for parcels within the City of Tigard and within the Urban Service Boundary (USB). An addressing fee in the amount of $30 per address shall be assessed. This fee shall be paid to the City prior to issuance of the site and/or building permit. For this project, the addressing fee will be $30 to account for the new building. FINDING: Based on the analysis above, the street utility and improvement standards have not been met outright, however, if the applicant complies with conditions 10 through 15 specified at the front of this report, the standards will be met. D. ADDITIONAL PLANNED DEVELOPMENT CRITERIA Section 18.350.100(B)(3) (a) through (I) provides additional Planned Development Review approval standards not necessarily covered by the provisions of the previously listed sections. These other standards are addressed immediately below with the following exceptions: The following have been discussed previously in this report and will not be discussed in this Section: 18.350.100.B.3.b, 18.350.100.B.3.f, 18.350.100.B.3.g, 18.350.100.B.3.i, 18.350.100.B.3.j, 18.350.100.B.3.k Relationship to the Natural and Physical Environment: The streets, buildings and other site elements shall be designed and located to preserve the existing trees, topography and natural drainage to the greatest degree possible; Structures located on the site shall not be in areas subject to ground slumping and sliding; There shall be adequate distance between on-site buildings and other on-site and off-site buildings on adjoining properties to provide for adequate light and air circulation and for fire protection; The structures shall be oriented with consideration for the sun and wind directions, where possible; and Trees preserved to the extent possible. Replacement of trees is subject to the requirements of Chapter 18.790, Tree Removal. The buildings have been located on the site to preserve existing trees. There is not significant topography or drainage that will be affected as a result of this proposal. There are no known areas of ground slumping or sliding on site. The proposed setbacks will insure that there is adequate light and air circulation. Fire protection has been considered and the location of these buildings will not hamper fire protection. There are no trees proposed to be removed. SWAMI VISWA PREMANANDA TEMPLE ADDITION PAGE 20 OF 23 CUP1999-00001/PDR1999-00002NAR1999-00024/AAIS1999-00026 PLANNING COMMISSION FINAL ORDER NO.99-03PC FINDING: Based on the analysis above, staff finds the relationship to the natural and physical environment standards have been met. Privacy and Noise: Non-residential structures which abut existing residential dwellings shall be located on the site or be designed in a manner, to the maximum degree possible, to protect the private areas on the adjoining properties from view and noise; FINDING: The temple will be the closest structure to the single-family dwellings west of the site, however, given the distance from the property line and the fact that it is oriented towards Hall Boulevard, this standard is met. The Ashram is considered a residential structure, therefore, this standard does not apply to that structure. Private Outdoor Area - Multi-Family Use: In addition to the requirements of subparagraph (3), each ground-level residential dwelling unit shall have an outdoor private area (patio, terrace, porch) of not less than 48 square feet; Wherever possible, private outdoor open spaces should be oriented toward the sun; and Private outdoor spaces shall be screened or designed to provide privacy for the use of the space. While the use is not truly multi-family, all but 2 of the rooms have a deck, the other 2 have access to a deck via a shared room. FINDING: Based on the analysis above, this standard has been met. Shared Outdoor Recreation Areas - Multi-Family Use: In addition each multiple-dwelling development shall incorporate shared usable outdoor recreation areas within the development plan as follows: Studio units up to and including two bedroom units, 200 square feet per unit; and Three or more bedroom units, 300 square feet per unit. Shared outdoor recreation space shall be readily observable from adjacent units for reasons of crime prevention and safety; The required recreation space may be provided as follows: It may be all outdoor space; or It may be part outdoor space and part indoor space; for example, an outdoor tennis court and indoor recreation room; or It may be all public or common space; or It may be part common space and part private; for example, it could be an outdoor tennis court, indoor recreation room, and balconies on each unit; or Where balconies are added to units, the balconies shall not be less than 48 square feet. While this is not truly multi-family because each room is not a self-contained unit, there are shared worship areas, yoga classrooms and open space. FINDING: Based on the analysis above, this standard has been met. Public Transit: Provisions for public transit may be required where the site abuts a public transit route. The required facilities shall be based on: (a) The location of other transit facilities in the area; and (b) The size and type of the proposed development. The required facilities shall be limited to such facilities as: (a) A waiting shelter; (b)A turn- out area for loading and unloading; and (c) Hard surface paths connecting the development to the waiting area. The access drive fronts SW Hall Boulevard, which is on a transit route, however, because the entire frontage is taken up by the access drive, this standard can not be applied. FINDING: Because the entire frontage on the transit route is taken up by the access drive, there is no place to provide transit facilities and, therefore, this standard can not be applied. SWAMI VISWA PREMANANDA TEMPLE ADDITION PAGE 21 OF 23 CUP1999-00001/PDR1999-00002NAR1999-00024/MIS1999-00026 PLANNING COMMISSION FINAL ORDER NO.99-03PC Floodplain Dedication: Where landfill and/or development is allowed within or adjacent to the 100-year floodplain, the City shall require consideration of the dedication of sufficient open land area for a greenway adjoining and within the floodplain. This area shall include portions of a suitable elevation for the construction of a pedestrian/bicycle pathway with the floodplain in accordance with the adopted pedestrian bicycle pathway plan. The proposal is not within or adjacent to the 100-year floodplain, therefore, this standard does not apply. FINDING: Because the site is not within or adjacent to the 100-year floodplain, this standard does not apply. SECTION VIII. OTHER STAFF COMMENTS The City Building Division has reviewed the proposed and offered the following comments: (1) All underlying land division must be consolidated into one legal description, (2) Provide accessible parking for phase #1, (3) Provide accessible route from all required exists of phase 1 to the public way. Marked crossings are required; (4) Will there be 2 site permits or done under 1 for both phases? (5) Occupancy will be based on 200 square feet per person; (6) Phase 1 is a R-1 congregate residence; (7) Provide a auto fire alarm, manual fire alarm and fire sprinklers if occupant load is 20; (8) Provide accessible rooms, 1106.2.2, 1106.1.10.6, table 11-B and 1109.25; (9) Correct scale on site plan 1"=30'; (10) Provide fire truck access to within 150 feet of all exterior walls, a turn-around is required; (11) How many quests #o a guest room? (12) An elevator is required for temple; (13) Area of rescue is required in lower temple area; (14) Is the lower level a story or a basement?; (15) Type of construction V-1 HR; (16) Is the dining hall a multi-use room?; (17) Ramp to lower level slope? (18) Too much to comment on. The City Police Department has had the opportunity to review the proposal and has requested that a lighting plan be submitted for review and approval. The City of Tigard Utility Manager has had the opportunity to review the proposal and indicated that all sanitary and storm sewer are to be private. The City of Tigard Property ManagemendOperations Department has had the opportunity to review the proposal and has offered no comments or objections. SECTION IX. AGENCY COMMENTS The Oregon Department of Transportation has reviewed the proposal and offered the following comments: The proposed developmenYs sole access is to Hall Blvd. According to the Oreqon Hiqhwav Plan, Hall Blvd. Is a State facility with a District highway classification. We have an interest in ensuring that proposed land uses do not negatively impact the safe and efficient use of this facility. We are concerned with the ability of the two lane highway access to safely accommodate the continued increase in traffic. Particularly, we are concerned that vehicles intending to enter the Kindercare site may not be able to directly turn in due to queuing which blocks the access. This could potentially cause vehicles to back up on the highway creating a potential safety problem. When the adjacent property to the north of the access road develops, the access should be widened to accommodate a three lane section. This improvement would alleviate ODOT's concerns. SWAMI VISWA PREMANANDA TEMPLE ADDITION PAGE 22 OF 23 CUP1999-00001/PDR1999-00002NAR1999-00024/MIS1999-00026 PLANNING COMMISSION FINAL ORDER NO.99-03PC + � � We recommend the City condition the Temple Expansion such that their peak traffic generation ties do not coincide with the peak traffic generation times of the Office development to the north or the Kindercare development to the southeast of the site. This condition would allow the Temple to expand without adding traffic pressure to the highway access. We encourage the applicant to work with the property to the north of the access road as they prepare development plans to ensure that the access is widened to accommodate the needs of all the property owners who share the highway access. Staff response: These comments have been discussed under the Street, Utility and Improvement Standards section and Variance discussion of this report. Unified Sewerage Agency has reviewed the proposal and offered comments which have been incorporated into the body of this report. Portland General Electric, NW Natural Gas, TCI Cable, General Telephone, Tri-Met, US West, and Tualatin Valley Water District were given the opportunity to review this proposal and submitted no comments or objections. SECTION X. CONCLUSION It is further ordered that the applicant and the parties to these proceedings be notified of the entry of this order. PASSED: This 6t'' day of December, 1999 by the City of Tigard Planning Commission. (Signature box below) �,��, � ' i l. Nick Wilsor� Planning Commission Chair 1 i:\curpin\julia\CUP99-01.final.doc SWAMI VISWA PREMANANDA TEMPLE ADDITION PAGE 23 OF 23 CUP1999-00001/PDFi1999-00002NAR1999-00024/MIS1999-00026 PLANNING COMMISSION FINAL ORDER NO.99-03PC , � � �� _�, � � FlR � I, \ � TING OFfIC BUIL G �� ./ � �\ -` 32 - � / / F�R /I / �� 1�i � I� � � � Z . � O s' � �, , � . � /—� /� 228.78' V� _ .pp• • ` — " � r�� ./i ^ O �l� ' �` � 0 � ��, '��T ' '��rr�' � `�/� '` V �� I� \ �1' w' ,�4°" c na 1� ��/ � '` Z � ��_ ia•� \' � FIR - � � Z� �1 � h /� \ �8 � '� ` I � � � o�wc ow�wY . P �- � f:(�SIiNG a � 4p, SRh:CT1iRE `w nec�nuaus Q 7REESTOBEREMOVED � �`� u5 ______—_—___ � 0'CYPRESS)� ^9 a c� P OSED TEMPLE � 226.0 nN (BASEMEN ELEV 217.0) � PHA � ?�. O b b ry ry � � `� 2 PROPOS n Y.a .o � . . � - V < S W M1. �>;, � 0 � - E7o511NG iR 3 PRO 2Tt Nip _ AR SP S BNCE RACK(6 SPACES) `� �___ PIiASE 1 [xistiNc srav�n�HE 2193 MI PROPOSED ASH FF 219i (AIATCH EXI NG PHASE 1 0 0 �� SITE PLAN � CUP1999-OOOOI/PDR1999-00002 EXHIBIT MAP N VAR1999=00024/MIS1999=00026 — ma is not to sca�e SWAMI VISWA TEMPLE EXPANSION � T��- - . IC�T� GEOGFnoHIC �NFOFMAT�ON SrSTEM \�� - __ ! VICINITY MAP y�� ---- -- ; ------------ ?�� CUP I 999-0000 I � � PDR I 999-00002 - VAR I 999-00024 sT - MIS I 999-00026 , � c�n� < - —� SWAMI VISWA =__ I�'� � °'_ _ � ' TEMPLE EXPANSION �� 2 SUBJECT � � � �_ i TAX LOTS FAFFLE � i - � � , �---_ w - ---- �� > ;Qi �� > ' , = Q _ � � � �� o� �,� ,� � � ,� ,- -� --� - . _ LOMITA rJ _ � 0 100 200 30D 400 Feet � � 1"=�03 feet i 1 I � ` � �Y ' � � � � ��, �I, �� Cin�of Tigard ' �I -c7 . Q! Q �I J\ Inlormalron on this map is for general lowtion ony and '� _. I�I .A�, should be verifietl wilh the Developmant Sernus Division. II • �� I 13125 SW Hall B�vd � Tipar4 OR 97223 . � /� ' � � (503)639-1171 �� i � � - �' �-- -- --- � .l '� � -- __= � �. ,. ', _ ` .�-�� .- � --.��:,_ �,, I http�.lMavw.ci.Ggard.or_us ... - -. •_-----'�--- -.�,—.._—._-- � . _ -.-. CcXnmunity Development Plot date: Sep 21, 1999;C:\magiclMAGIC03.APR 03/12/99 12:18 $503 684 7297 CITY OF TIGARD 1�001 ` ��**��*�� ACTIVITY REPORT �� &#�#��*��&�&:k�&&&�� TRANSMISSION OK TX/RX N0. 3336 CONNECTION TEL 5032432944 503 CONNECTION ID CITI ATTORNEY START TIME 03/12 12:13 USAGE TIME 04'31 PAGES 8 RESLILT OK r � � ,� I; ,+� { � � a i , FAX TRANSMITTAL r, � �.,a i I �,��, � ��,�i,:,: Date March 12, 1999 Number of pages including caver sheet � To: Jim Coleman From: Doris Michael Co: Ca: Citv of Tiaard Fax#: Fax#: 684-7297 Ph #: 639-4171. Ext. 317 SUBJECT: CUP 99-0001 Dick Brewesdorff asked me to contact vou c�ncemina a aroposed church that will include a residential comqonent The temple plans to enlarge an existinq house to cantain 12 . ... � . � � � • r � � � . ._.L"_ ____ u _______ L��. ♦!�� FAX TRANSMITTAL �� Date March 12, 1999 Number of pages including cover sheet � To: Jim Coleman From: Doris Michael Co: Co: City of Tiqard Fax #: Fax#: 684-7297 Ph #: 639-4171, Ext. 317 SUBJECT: CUP 99-0001 Dick Brewesdorff asked me to contact you concerning a proposed church that will include a residential component. The temple plans to enlarqe an existinq house to contain 12 auest- rooms with one kitchen/dining facility; and a worhsip area. It appears from the plans that the church plans to enlarge the ashram facility in the future, but no plans been submitted for phase 3. The proposed project is located in the CP Zone, which does not allow residential uses. Do you think it is appropriate to consider this an accessory use to the church's conditional use permit that is being processed ? The case is underqoinq apqlication completeness and a letter is ready to be sent saying it is incomplete for a variety of reasons. I'm faxinq you a copy of the ashram facility plans. I'm also includinq the zoning/location map as well as their site plan. Let me know if you need any additional information. Thanks for your assistance. We need to determine completeness by 3-31- 99. MESSAGE: I:�ENG�FAX.00T �i � � � � � �J� ..�� _ ��-- . , � � - L J �� ' / W �_ � � Y PINE ST PINE I _ ---- � � �� "'y� r - r� � ' I i �—i—!L _- � I I � ��RUB€ ST -- SRRUCE _ � I —1 ST �-- . �! i _-. _'� � , .' � �1- � I \THORN ST - � i I`-.- �' � I _ � , �,� � I �� -�� ''-1 _�-- � a- { -Jm; . '�� _ � , I� L�_ STE� �� ii — - — � -_ - - - -- -- � ��-� J- � � Q , y�2y 1I � � o � �. : -,� _. R ;� ,�; __� l�; � �� ; �.- L _ o�icorA � � ;. , — { -' .__ ` ` — �� - r � � �I- < � � �� _- �� T �I ..; . � , i � � ' _ I - \ �\ � . . � ' ' . . . \\ - - I - - -_� � � � � � , T -- j _ �� ; "��' �� 1 _ � � �� - � , � s-- �a � - - _ ' \ �� ' - r - �� , ,i y , - �� , � -� __ � ' C �12� . �, �o ' � � i � � � `�� ,i — ��°�,�. � T � � � �� A � � 9g� i LN -- � ' I�� ) � - � 1 � � � � � / � � � � � � 1 � , � � il'�, l ! � - - ' .� ,� � _ �I� � � ,� , , � _ �� , , h �� `, J � �� i �� ` � ��y% �� , , °j �� m �/ � G' � �� , � � � , 3 �,�'� � � � � � ° f= -�;� � ` � `�' �� ",� �OARDEN � �� ,�/ (_� tIrt //y / � .<\\ %. � . �� scy� /Ty� _ , k'�O�c ` eG,Q� ` ��r �� ,� �%i � �� /�_�v � >;� / �� „ r n /I /� . . . _ - ,=�I-�� . . ' � . r \ 2 ' / \ ` � / . ��! �. � '�- �8�`��l 32�� g � y � TJRr'as�� f'�� -� /�,��R � � �� ; / I F �,��, �B~ '- �� • �� :�;t • ?1 T � I r FI � � � i � ! \� ' � �1 �-1� 40" i \ '�, F-i � FiR -V' + i/ - � � �� , � � �'- t8" � `..' i�i-�� ; o � F�R � �-- �WER POLE i L � -- 40" f � i ��R��` � �':(-- ! 1 �� 1�� --� . I . -� � � _ - EXISTiNG _ _ . � .. �. DRIVEWAY - I� - c' (��II � / EXISTING � --- w+osca� 40' �� I �T�i;�r�_�Kc <�., � � �E�IDU❑ – i � � � n..m � ;i — -- _.... ..__. -_ �- -- � i . N � ; \ m � � ��_ ;- � — � �.9 � - -- �. �.. '- — �� ,. �— `. � .� ji _ ='' PROPOSED TEMPLE 4. ' Ij FF 226.0 �.� � ��-- (BASEMENT ELEV 217.0) , m as �— �'� _ t.ox $ �cR,,n+ -, . RIM 2K.5 �16.8 � . -^;J,:... . � � �AN. . 2�,.,�.,� I -� ._. x I � - . � � 4 �q /� � . ., i� ' ' � 't y � ) R �� - ., ','� - .' _. ' � ' ,� r? � .. �I' �_ `_M1 �..... ' 6. �' �J. ._... . "'_ ' i. : .l_ � _1 �_—:��_i� .._:__�� -�-�-- � .�737.42 -._-. ... _. _ _ " "_" '_- ._._ ""___- ' � 716. �, .O . IS .O.C. � - pR4Iy� . . . . 4 .0 .O:C. SI�NMH -.� .. � «'7- __-'- ..._. .. .]19.�5 �RIM�KSY 4 C4 �� RT .9 _-._-"_ - —_ '.._ _,. '_ � ... e ox .c .o u. .a .oa+. zzi.i h. .c . ��,; � ai.s O.C. ; /1 . � . FLOW . ' I'`J _ _ �..,. . -"_ __ __ __ "_. � .r 31.5 � I . . ._.__.. . __... __ ' . __ 1 S "_,. h � _ i ._�_-�. .� .__- ___'_ . c / , . '_-.-__. TA11 - ��,] � �CCATCN BASIN . � _ - ". -. - ... .- _ �,�' �� , RIY Ft T21.9B • .� . _ ) '� _ - 331 �- '_ "_JI �7 C� � - __ - �= . .. �....-.. _ _ 3 " .._,, , -'.i_. __"_ .-�1. :�. _ _ _.--- /--- `--- u . .. . , � . P '/, . ... '>f � �ns � .� p• 7 - _- .4+ -- -- ao. � T 5 � . - La1JO5C6PE I _ ._.- .. . � I 'Xi°11NG � �, L� . � -� a�a � � T9� y^ _ '__""'___' � _ JTRIif.TURE I �� '-_. " � j FF 219t r � - . � ' � �GATCH BASIN ' . . .______'_'.'_'_'_"'"__""__"_'_'_.____ .______. PoMEL220.85 � -_T'�!RF P�;�-,� ��; � PROPOSEO ASHRAM � � FF 219t (MATCH EXISTING _: -- r.o B � . . . - .__. . . ...___�_ '' STOItM MANHOLE �, A �._.�.�.. ... 1W . -...' RIM EL 219.50 T� �j A L_ ..... . . ._. �, �I3 .. � � GYTLET STRUL711RE ' _�— �- �--]I6 �5 /IIM 314.0 5 -._" , ...., . .., .. �. , ._ __.. . C4 . �_ �� GRADING LEGEND SITE GRADIN�,s PLAN �'-"I5n"�""'... E%IS1iuG CONiWR IINE �*icr [{[y' � � CAiCH BA4N �55�NEW CONTWR LINE Op • AIANHOIE �0 0 ]e aE ti 0.�� - �TILIIY Pp'�[ E%ISTNG SGOT ELEV�Td/ � �� fIRE Nt➢RnNT IS{.5 O �M ME1ER �— NEW SPOT ELEVATION VRONDE STAKE. SEE SPEC'S QV Q UnI�TY V�ULT EL ELEVATp! OT Q TRANSFdtMER ANO PAU � B.N. BENCM YARK � � �AL1�E BpX COVER � T.O.C. TOP OF CVRB �.�-� UCHT POIF B.O.C. BOR011 Of CURB O- - - WALL MWMT[p�IpIT 4.M. YMIMQf c.e. c.+ra�e.sn G < fWE DEPMTIRI�CONNECTON I _._O1CK' �''" . s �j �IM I I. M�K WWAR�►�t��`Y��Y��RMl�1�M� 5 �. 11 �I �uW . � '... . - _ .1�:.5� �) �.r 1 I � C � ,- A � '' - r-w:-��• i.�-T � �� , ,c' � � � � '-� � . i • � i '� 8 ° � �7:� , - : 3 ��1�� ,�f � � a� - � � �3}s� __ - -- _ + `�i� ' » �. ' �- °i'r {�i a �I �• =ll . 4 ,.( - � �. ;,; r �____-_ _--� R��,, � ��;I _ � - � 1�' � € 'I 6. �`..�` _ _ ""'�,,,' iD I,�1.� �� U �� i , , . � , ' . �� . � , � � _ � > _ .� � �' � • , � � E ° ' � , �..,..� '.�.� , # i� J , � � .�"�. � �� , , =� �� ,�, ,„ , �; ..�•� i ��' '"�'��.��, + � e ' � ��,� rl� trXp..�� 4A[x}�� ' - � �•�� \,�� ; I¢ t1 t 'j 1� � 'A��S Y�� ' . � �z� ,�7 < '�� ,.rr�'�iE >; �"�,C' .� � � '�� 1 �� 1 i� p : ts:s' �� ,�'4�� aF:l > �}�' 1tiC� � �f��.. . 8,Ji L i�r � r i �?.� i.Ce• i � f° $ i � l< $r e I�� .e. :.� k y�' N �e.c!• � � �� f r3f ��v:�� r �b�� ,�f�� + � �1^7 � �T�?,Y�J. � . ` iy.x�;k� � . • �{,nr,,�trg.7trtn< j � .�"'c ,��k�, tw ��y� �. .; �1 _ � � ' �+ kt W �. j t �� f i ^ y 1 i ��— �` ��rf�.� ��t��t � ;�.� � - yt ; V/ . � 4� � I f.v ��rt � ?. �r�`h` a .# } � _ � �"t'c.P'"'ayv.T^Fe-• m tl'� . . � � v � � # � �.�� p� -,��`C�O a ii ��.,. �1l � �rf..�.. � , i � r-t� �R �>5 �r � Y -h r = e t � � » j ��.,� - ti � � � 1 yK :-�:�� ; ,� �, .� � =3 r •'• � • � �l r �'' ,v�T'� c ` � �� Q „ � I' � � _ � C\ � ,� � ; �.-`r f ' t 1- ��a:` \ : � "'__3—_ � � r�L��'� rt. ��e r �,��.��-�� O l��x ; ....3�+;� r- 'r a..��!�€ '��r�: '. �. .4'�,. r§a l^ h z. b 2.� . ..s 1 .� ' k� d' .tj �. _ �� .� j � t �`.. �� I��r � `r'�°€.� .j,�, , t'- ,�.� "* ,s � � - i � ��I a x r��six r. 1L R F.. y� �� S*"�'.t 1. � s��:t r �. r � �P F M� ��y � R ;` r �� _�.��. ; � f a� M�.� -" Ml et> �£' .� .'r ' £� , � :� ' � � � 4 f .� �` Vy � ,�,�� ' � A I � I �x .dr•�:a � � � .,�:.�F k.�l r�i r '� '.3°�F �s:'t�. 2' � �J .'.`4�. - 11� _ � � _ t �`c� �''��' �� ; � �>> h: _� G...., , � _� t�, � :: c, .. ,,� c: � t�?; � ��. � ��y �_ �_� ...:, - r, � :: '. ��. '� �L;�„T ,. f v,V �'j J � ' 'ADDITION TO THE EXISTING BUILDING FOR` wv�ruwww►wN ARCHI'fECT N BRAHMA PREMANAHDA ASHRAM-TEMPLE n��M�IORRItONNI! 1'OR7LAND,dt tt10! 11515 S.W.HALL BWD. TIGARD,OR 97223 � � � �. � �, �, � � �, �,i r� � � , - , ,_� , , � � , � � � � � � � � � � � i i - i - i �� i -i� � i � �'I �,� "I�'I I I I � I I I � I l � I � , � , , � J i � � i , I . O j 0 � � '� I � ao I ; .�.�,�Y.�� - � t��.;�z --------------- �� .`�z��'��#�"y,'� !�'^a yL� ^ a --t - �' „s e':� n�l . -,. ., _ �� i +j�.1�� '��a d^r.�FS-�,-riu-��x.S�v .f yt ,f'�a � :;rf n ?t^�S cr ,�. Y�y'�l'�a v 5'C4t SrYx s� � � ; • r ��y �A-'1 � rr T, y' 3 .� y �.� ,�4W,+s e-6 f �,�''z� ''�,� `�` �r�,�-�'� ';� �`',r� ^t? ,��r g,�e�; r .,1f a a � ,.�b�u � -�' :1 , t,+� � �. �r� PfTit7. +.4 y, 8 x�} . L v+� �'' . -�..��.� y aY�k:v.cs } '�.i �A � Y {I }� _ ! s�°u �c�!1r`4'�+t�L SY�'� FiSY"Y'` +ia w7 r.,<� �.,.� ��T P� � O � '� ��`t"-'T; �� ilr�:+. k ..a �t.F f.{ .k 1-rl * ,v�`i � ��`n Y. 1pp!° , r I� � Q�� • •y' a i�� „��sa�'1.d T"�x M'�i � rS .-� � . =.�. . '' : � ,'��:�wyr"�rn��"��i-sx�-a�� Ai `��r•-��-��t�J'�� r�' 7 . .. r '�r c� Fu�'-�p' S2'..�`� �.. r -� r.�,. � , ; .. � . . r ut:- e�;_ � .� . � w�:e�;��?�`'� a��Y �� H; t�,. A x�.' �`v��'6 a,�� ,�;+7Jcfl�'� ;f.�,w�-,r.:y;y r,7r�", � `� _ I � � - --- I + -- -- = ' �� .� � � � - - --- I r" .' i' '.. � « ° �� - � . .... � -_.. -��i�« r � � � � � J � . _.�.. _ �.. _ ' i - •pi i �_ � CCy s ... ,--_-- �nr�rm� _.. i 3 ' � F i/ 1.� �( F j` �� , y .. �� 7 �� . � , . ' Q � � i . �� , � �� 9 • _ �; 'I_ _ �� . � , ; : ; , z ; s� {:' , ,,,. > a �'�'.�� . - _ � � � . � _ --- - - I } ��• � _ � i� � " O1 s' ' ,t» _� � I' �••�,r,s l,, � i I . �. � ' ^ ; � �,� ; :_,. . .. � ' r � . , �. .;;r,«—..,��.-- • ' * _ - � � r_ _ i ,� ; . i � ! �` ,. � •M ,r a^.�Y7nn ieoY �+ ��s � � 5 � '_� 0 " �°� - �g �b �`� ,� � o ; oi � � � � � � 9 � � ' � , � n 3 .'4 � � , � 'rX. _ • r . _ � � � � .. �= _ �y „ � �j ' � ,t~ � R�c ��f � 4 --� �� `�� D _�7 � r !1 � i' � - � �i - i - � N. i � - _ Y 'O' • � .• _ N, � � � � O O _ f ;. . . . Y_. � � .:�, . . :�a - , . -- -- - - ---��.--- ------ - ---- � `� - ..w,.�w�rt iov�t�.. - ___ --,—__' � _ ._ _. - - _-- vMw+r _.._-rm� � 7 w�i� . 1 r i A'� � �` x �. � � i �1 1� h��v L ��,�� I � � ,...,� � ' . ..} �... t `�� i A A'.] S. �'�' • � ..-...a.�. .; �, ' . �. , r� .. a�1C i '. .' ... , .� y��y .� NR .y..� . .. .. ' � ( I ',.: I.f R;jaaAC-_T�bw'� •r�fr �e.. � :...- ...... „� l. :•_ ..J .•• I� ' I'1w��r��r��rw..lrr•.....M `, .(� ._ � __-_ - .t. ~y - � � .� .'�� v'\�./J � � �� T ^yM� 1T ' — +e�w.u�r�. � 1 � �� —_� � ♦ ' .r�.: _ _- _ i .t.�� ry - �;6 � . � �� , __r��.:. -- _ - - - - . �.,�_ -- �:�W:..�..w. +� _ �b , �� _--- -------- - . ---- - -- -- _��.._,... ...� —, - --- SOUTH ELEVATION: �- � n�r��Y y I . .. � W i �F- � g � � ' �� _I__. � - - � - � ...��.a: +� ..r.n.f '�-�° -� - ��,- - . =e¢ '. _4..- �t�+w� - _ ,�,�p^ �a O � � �_ —_ �t� \ �Z� rt �� _ W Z� n — - , �a� � = ; � x� ,� - - C- _t Q�� ,i - � _„ ; �r � _ _ �a!p -� - . . . ,...� . __� � �Y_I I . �'i•r�M+�'. ..�E , ' .�. +�� .:. . . , . . i I .' � �' -----�'"�"'--'��----------� I �__�.^_----I�,.d-r�------fi-- tG-' m EAST ELEVATiON NORTH ELEVATION . __. ��- 1V•- . . 5 : i ,. - - ._._. ......_...... ._ _ .. _.__.T . . . _.�. � �� . . • , .. . i t . i. . � i ; . �� I� _ ' , ;I � � -- - — � - -- ._._.__�_,._-_ �I�� I '. .�. ' , .. :.� __-�'__�.�...._�_ �. . ' '�� `.-.... .. i . :. �I• 1 , � ,i �n : � .� _. �. ; _ i � j �' i,I ; . - z .�� ,. -- • �, � _ . i.� � .— _ _._ _ _.__ _._ __.._ . , � �, � I, _r, 1 � _" A�� \ � +Ii I, ' - � r �, � � , �� j� �� i ,%,. _ � --=-— I i t � �� i; , I � �I � II I .. . .,� � �, ��;� Ii^ _ � _. �- I �i '�� I _—� _-1I---_----- -- - • �..`�`.� I I li � , ' `� il�j) i ' � � II ! i �- � i A�. ;�I1I � �5 I li . I �� r,. �'�:'� .. �I I ��, � ' t. I � � I i ' �: � I �� .. i ~{ �I � , II'i ��3 � _ X�' , � -� i� �I Q �� I � x . l i^ I � _ � � , il� l.. � sx � �k � ,( �I' � j� � � ,} I,i� � � �I � E� 3, �'!�II � �k --- �,�, I � �� ` f ' � i ; � -`. �! ;�� , ,a ;i , - ; , I �� ;I,i �,� ; �� . . I;:; 4; . ;; ; y � I� � . I � j - - I 1 Il,i • '-. �A . I / I�,�I I I �,��'.� � l�r.+rt � � i � If� .' i �. , �� I _�.� ' �j i2; �'� 1 �( / I i�i I j k u, ' �I� � y� z .: p•,-'; // _- � i' � i � �,, i I I `...�...aq .`-� .� C'. �_..r t , . ' i{ I, � � 1 1� .� .�. . J�.I I ` i, tr.A'" �-'� �� , , �' `'1� I :p 1 f`'..s� i�j �� 1 � .� 'f� � -'r,� I f��-�+r � ; -. ' --' I � � � '`t�1 �_ � :..:� e;� . �.� . � i i , lJ"��f rt ��"�� ' �� .: . . ly r e'J - � . i II i ��.,: . I• 7 i � .. � � , , I I � e t T E M P L E P � � N AW PRADHAN ARCNITECT E--� B R A M H A.,P R�E M A N A N�D A 921 s.W.MORR[SON �415 I PORT4AND,OR 97205 TEMPLE/ASHRAM _ `� � ; 1i515 S.W.HALL BLVD.1'iGARD,OR.97223 , J.___._._'_'___ _. ._._f • I � � �\ � • I _ N / y � . .. . . � ! � I , �r \��.. I i ' � %�t� j`� ' i i -- +6 • ' .I � i - ; s-� . + l � •, i .f; . .- ; . i _. . . i __ � � �i � . � � ; � � �y ° � - �'�I Q � c:.� . � __ ��,� �. �; �� . . � .... i' , . ! 'I �� : � - � , �<�I ,'`:,\ , � � I `` . I . �� ' I - - � `,, ; � � -- 1� --- I -� i� � ' - I E \ , '�I_ I � _ _ u' �' _ _- ;� � - :� � � . ;, ; .i: I�� , l� � � ! - � , �d � r � � " ' ��, ( ;�, , , . J.J t � . . `,j_„'�.�--I,�.r1.','� �.�1�.� . . . . .� �/� � . 1 . ��' ��_ . ..._. FAX TRANSMITTAL �. ;;;�i �.,,��,�,� I ','�'I° Date March 12, 1999 Number of pages including cover sheet �_ To: Jim Coleman From: Doris Michael Co: Co: City of Tiqard Fax#: Fax #: L�y - � J.°l � Ph #: 639-4171. Ext. 317 SUBJECT: CUP 99-0001 Dick Brewesdorff asked me to contact you concerning a proposed church that will include a residential component. The temple plans to enlarge an existing house to contain 12 guest- rooms with one kitchen/dining facility; and a worhsip area. It appears from the plans that the church plans to enlarge the ashram facility in the future, but no plans been submitted to date for this phase. The proposed project is located in the CP Zone, which does not allow residential uses. Do you think it is appropriate to consider this an accessory use to the church condtional use that is beinqprocessed ? The case is undergoin� application completeness and a letter is ready to be sent sayinq it is incomplete for a variety of reasons. I'm faxing a copy of the ashram facility. I'm also includinc�the zoning/location map as well as their site plan. Let me know if you need any additnal information. Thanks for your assistance. J-c.r. C�u�L �r o�- -a-w- L �.Q� c9 f .3 ��s-/ �i 9 � rL.�� l, � � 31 31 / `� 9 -�.r 3� d.c�., Gc-'}-��-a� .1�— �/ t�.A - p ,.,,, s/a q /Q � J', ,-,._ �.s oc-�.e� ec� ,a_e..�,h� �vt-- � Z�'ti.-¢„-� �-et�c.�% S . �i{�� w,-c� � � wC � �uA.dJ MESSAGE: ��-6 ��.c�-a�t t� �-�. � C - -e,�l—G.s�� v�-- ,�-�x--h U�-- nY' �° �� o �C,c�� c� �c_-� _ �.�.�� L„ C G° �7�,.� - I:�ENG�FAX.DOT �C� f� o � 9 b �'�_S b `�'s �� -!�6 -r,I O �� f�.�� % c"° �� "'�"�' s Yr''f'� z S � � c�-� '�'''� s� 1 !-�-1 SA o�x�-, �a'►+� 5��N ,r! ;-�� -� � ; ,_,, y ,.�-I. �'.f,�✓ r ,� (�,,,a� � �.`:AA March 30, 1999 CITY OF TIGARD Swami Viswa Premananda OREGON 11515 SW Hall Boulevard Tigard, OR 97223 Re: Letter of Incomplete Application for CUP 99-0001 Located at 11515 SW Hall Blvd; WCTM 1 S135DA01400. Dear Swami Viswa Premananda: Thank you for submitting the conditional use application to allow a religious institution on the 1.67 acre parcel of land located at 11515 SW Hall Boulevard, in the Professional/Administrative Commercial (C-P) Zone. Staff reviewed the application and determined that it is incomplete. Please clarify or submit the following information so that the use permit application can be processed: 1. Submit two copies of self-addressed and self-stamped envelopes for the 500-foot public notice mailing requirement. Also, submit a map showing the area that will be noticed and a list of the names and addresses of the property owners who will be notified of your request. 2. Submit a project narrative (18 copies) describing the following: . The number of chairs that can fit in the main assembly. . The hours of operation for any activity at the ashram and temple that are proposed. . The number of people that will reside at the facility. Additional on-site parking may be needed if the residential use conflicts with the parking needs of the office use. . Describe what will be occurring during the three phases noted on the plans. For example, describe the approximate dates for each phase, the proposed uses, hours of operation and size of the facilities that will be built. . You will also need to address in the narrative the City's code criteria when requesting approval of a conditional use (and a religious institution) in the C-P Zone. Attached (Attachment 1) is a copy of the code provisions that need to be addressed. 13125 SW Hall Blvd., Tigard, OR 97223(503)639-4171 TDD (503)684-2772 Page 1 of 3 . , 3. Submit a site plan that shows the three phases of building construction. Also, include the proposed height and size of the facilities, the proposed landscaping, the bicycle and vehicle parking areas (even if it is on the adjoining parcel), sidewalks, setbacks, lighting, signs, mailboxes, and enclosed garbage enclosures. Please submit an 8Y�" by 11" version of this revised site plan. The site plan does not need to show elevations, grading, utilities, or erosion control measures. Please note that the front yard setback for a religious institution is 25 feet. This means the proposed ashram facility will need to be further from the front property line. 4. Submit a landscape plan (18 copies) showing the location, size and type of trees, shrubs and ground cover that will be planted on the site. Please note the total area or square footage that will be landscaped so we may be sure that 15% of the site is landscaped, as it required for the C-P Zone. 5. Submit 18 copies of a tree removal and replacement plan for any trees over 6 inches of caliper that will be removed. 6. A buffering plan. The code requires buffering be provided along the west property line since the property abuts a residential zone. This requirement may be satisfied with landscaping. Attachment 2 discusses the options for meeting the buffering requirements. This may be located on the landscape plan. .,a ��,�s�,�;�c: o� ��'�:�2, n�� s Eo a ,�J�-�-t � � s n%��:x�c-.a �; 3c.��tc-+ ��/sy e�•-�-� 7. Our office sees that you have paid the fee for an access variance. Please complete the attached variance application to request a reduction of the required a 40-foot-wide driveway to 24-feet (when it provides access to more than a hundred (100) parking spaces). You may wish to discuss this matter with Mr. Jim Waddle. He recently came to our office to discuss adding offices along the north side of the accessway and was also advised that the driveway needs to be enlarged. Mr. Waddle's phone number is 221-2003. The variance form and the findings that need to be addressed are also attached (Attachment 3). 8. Please submit a final copy of the reciprocal parking agreement. The second party of the agreement did not sign the version you submitted nor were the exhibits included. One final note, please be aware that the Tigard Community Deve�opment Code does not allow residential uses in the CP Zone at this location. You have two options in which to be allowed to build an ashram at this location. Your options are as follows: . You may request to place the land in a Planned Development (PD) Zone. According to the code, a PD Zone may allow a maximum of 25% of the total gross floor area of a permitted commercial use to be used for residential uses; or . You may request to change the zoning code to amend the land use classification section so that residential uses are considered to be an appropriate accessory use of a religious institution (Section 18.130.020B9). 3/30/99 Swami Viswa Premananda Ltr. Page 2 of 3 Re: Incomplete Application Submittal for CUP 99-0001 The PD and Zone Ordinance Amendment applications are also attached (Attachment 4 and Attachment 5). Should you have any questions or need any assistance, please feel free to call me. My phone number is 639-4171, extension 317. Please note that the City's development code is on the Internet so that you may directly access it. The e-mail address is www.ci.tigard.or.us\cd\toc.htm. Sincerely, /�-��, %'nc��— Doris Michael Associate Planner I:lcurpinldorislcup\cup99-1 ashramincomplete.doc Attachments.j5): #1 - Conditional Use Permit Criteria/Findings (5 pgs.) #2 - Buffering Requirements (8 pgs.) #3 -Variance Application and Variance Findings (4 pgs.) #4 - Planned Development Application (2 pgs.) #5 -Zone Ordinance Amendment Application (2 pgs.) c: CUP 99-0001 Land use file 1999 Planning correspondence file 3/30/99 Swami Viswa Premananda Ltr. Page 3 of 3 Re: Incomplete Application Submittal for CUP 99-0001 03/30/99 18:40 $503 684 7297 CITY OF TIGARD �001 ��s�� ACTIVITY REPORT �� *��*��* TRANSMISSION OK TX/RX N0. 3938 CONNECTION TEL 000 CONNECTION ID GEOSTANDARDS START TIME 03/30 18:38 LiSAGE TIME O1'45 PAGES 3 RESLILT OK P091�.�'.►%t�.c 7671 D3lE �G� � Pe�f e�� To �� Fmm � Co./Dept Co _ Pnone� � -��yd�C, Phone� �j�— Marct� 30, 9999 F�� — �7 Fax# � �:r.�.c�• � �.G ��ncs - �� Swami Viswa Premananda �R��a�N '!1515 SW Ha11 Boulevard Tigard, OR 97223 Re: Letter of Incomplete Application for CUP 99-OQ01 Located at 11515 SW Hall Blvd; WCTM 1S735DA0144a. Dear Swami Viswa Premananda: Thank you for submitting the conditional use app(ication to allow a religious institution on the 1.67 acre p�rcel of land lacated at 11515 SW Hall Boulevard, in the Professional/Administrative Commercial (C-P) Zone. Staff revi�wed the application and determined that it is incomplete. Please clarify or submit the foliowing information so that the use perm�t application can be processed: 1. Submit two copies of self-addressed and self stamped envelopes far the 540-foot public no#ice mailing requirement. Also, submit a map showing the area that will be noticed and a list of #he �ames and addresses of the property owners who will be notified of your request. 2. Submit a project narrative (18 copies) describing the following: . The number of chairs that can fit in the main assembly. . The hours of operation for any activrty at the ashram and temple that are proposed. -` --� I r� �� , ��Yl Q � - �� -,N— ��+' s�z-r— 1��,.-- C�, ,��'- ' x:_ . �' �. m-?.e-� -'a r.+`.�.�o t.c„�.:; � t,- ..`7/ /u.��f ��?? J�.t �{ J.►.C'r7�-'�07't,,�• - .� _.. � __ _ � � ___ -- �---. ._� �� • .. �� + � �, r, , .^-'� W�� ! !�-z+C��-'`�' " ^ �,"' �" ��,-.S ,� . . ,. � � ' G!i I't) ✓� • p??__.___- �C-��-�...� __ �-t�4��o.,J.��— �._ _ _--- ' ' i -� .�_�s t3._ ^_.._._�----- -----...-- �- ✓L.� f" _r fr, , ��..., lL I i . - -� J___ __,__- _ � _._.._,..2r�- C..S c,� �rr�'��v,�_�t..,�, . f,� 1 „�� . � . .� �_t.:� ,�J,,t�-��-� _4� _J Wi_I.�.. ___.�_ . ;, . i �� rt.�,,..��-�.� .�A___;__.�z�.�_-� -�'� b�..�' � , _ �-- �-- - .�.a,.c.� . . ��..--'-�` � �- --------- ;; . � . �_�__ ,, : w _.—�-� - Lt-- - --�1.�-�'-�.--ln-�`x..�r�.1�1C-_ �.Y_'±?�'D-'�..i�. - - _ _-_--- ' ��',a�_ ;�u...4..��a.�-�. _ �� r- p e�-�e�_,___s�%,. s.��.�Q.._ _.. , � ,, _______.____-__��L-- .. GL.�. -{�!`� rr-�..2_ . C�._t�e..�'�"±�c_S _... �.L��A. '�`� �t�_ _---- , � I_ � �t-4e--�oL ��. .�-_:l�t.�� _ .5�-�r_- �f��a,..,�_� _ - --.-.:�-,rsl- -----.+:.�•-�.�1�.�..�- �t-C.��.1_L►.�_ _�.c�. c..4� ��`"'�__� - ' �,�"- -.---- - . �-�- �" � � ��-° _ --- � �''� V�'� _ �— �,-..-�J �t r�r��.�,�r..r.(.�0 `�.!�--_s" - L,�t..A.L �f . . _ _ . � . --�r� �:o �'= ap..T-- �_��.�_f .' 'L'�.r#- _ ',ut I,-�-�- � '��---___ . wce.,c;/ �--1.�� - - ----��,� �-t -- -- I v.1 �-*�k-- �.p ro�� "�r �- �? �.�-iCr✓1�t.7,. . . _ I - • _ . _ _ _. _ . . _-- .._.^___.__.,c l • , : �!-S--Q--------.k:e.�t�-?�tll.a-�.�_ __ _�-�.f � w.a�___. ______. .� ----�'�_LLL��._�t'D t.�.�� : _.� _ _�...�.+Q_�._ .v��L�.. ---..�_�__._._ _. --- � -�rc—e..� _ �j.�.,e�---�.�.._�'.�''7,� -�.,_�""1�.,...� . --- --- - ._ ti.� - � ��-- -----�+:1...3��...__ �-L�.. �u�.,� , . �--- -- ► �r,-.,: � � �,� ..�_._►_�K____..��c,�o�.�� ..a.� _ r� � , ' . a�-,�''` a,�..�, i t. �,a.,.�'M t�, � � _ _--�--� �,-------�-t�� r1--�-_�_� _ ---___._ _ __.___,-�-�,.E��_.._.�__ �t te-�FC� ��.�:� _ _ t __._.._ _ � _��.�-��-- �-1= �.�r.�1}��-s �_�pt�� - � z��.. TIGARD MUNICIPAL CODE c. Business equipment sales and the Bull Mountain Road District, on or above the services; second floor of the structure; d. Business support services; b. Home occupations subject� to provisions of Chapter 18.142; e. Communication services; c. Family day care; f. Children's day care; 4. Transient lodging/restaurant (on the g. Financial,insurance,and real estate ' same parcel); services; 5. Temporary use; h. Medical and dental services; 6. Fuel tank;or i. Participation sports and recreation: 7. Accessory structures. (Ord. 90-41; Ord. (i) Indoor;and 89-06;Ord.86-08;Ord. 85-32;Ord. 84-73;Ord. 84- 29;Ord.83-52) - (ii) Outdoor (not to exceed ten -------- percent of the total square footage within the 18.64.040i� Conditional Uses (See Chapter\ office complex); �-Tg;��;-_ - . j. Personal services,general; A. Conditional uses in the C-P district are as follows: k. Professional and administrative services; 1. Heliports, in accordance with the Aeronautics Division(ODOT)and FAA; 1. Research services;and 2. Hospitals; m. The following uses,separately or in combination,shall not exceed a total of 20 percent 3. Utilities;and of the entire square footage within the development complex: 4. Religious Assemblies. �� (i) Convenience sales and 5. Construction Contractor's Professional personal services; Offices. (Ord. 93-28;Ord. 92-15;Ord. 89-06;Ord. 85-32;Ord.84-29;Ord.83-52) (ii) Eating and drinking establishments;and 18.64.050 Dimensional Requirements. (iii) Retail sales,general; A. Uimensional requirements in the C-P district are as follows: 3. Residential use types: 1. The minimum lot area shall be 6,000 a. Multiple-family residential units as square feet; a mixed use in conjunction, developed at R-40+ standards, with a commercial development, only 2. The average minimum lot width shall be in the CP District within the Tigard Triangle and 50 feet; 18-b4-2 Reformatted 1994 i .... ---__.,_,— _ � ____ _.___ ___.___ :�__,�__.__�. __��_— _.._._�, Dick Bewersdorff Re: Fwd: FW: Int ting Code Question Page 1 : I� :�,..�-_:�:.:�.W� , _ _ From: Doris Michael To: Jim Hendryx Date: Wed, May 19, 1999 1:03 PM Subject: Re: Fwd: FW: Interesting Code Question Regarding this matter, Kirsten and her client were told to explain the proposed use of the 8 guestrooms (and future rooms) and how this use is similar to commercial lodging or a bed and breakfast. I said we would see how this use could be processed during the cup for a religious facility. Swami Viswa Premanada submitted a conditional use permit for a religious facility on property along Hall in the C-P Zone. The plans show an ashram that included the swami's residence (with a kitchen), a worship area, yoga area, another kitchen area and 8 guestrooms. A second phase is proposed to expand the proposed ashram area (size and uses unknown at this point) . A third phase includes a 6100 sf temple. When Dick, Jim Coleman and I reviewed the plans, we found that the residential component was not allowed in this zone nor was residential uses allowed under the definition of a religious facility. We advised the applicanYs representative that he could either request a code amendment to include housing as an incidental use of a religious faciliry or request a P.D. which would allow 25% of the commercial use for housing. At a meeting I had with Sam, the applicanYs representative, he said the ashram use was like commercial lodging as visiting swami's (religious teachers)would stay in the guestrooms and that they usually do not stay long. I told Sam that we had not considered that use, but that I was willing to look at that as a way to proceed. I asked him to explain in writing the use of the ashram and how it fit the commercial lodging use when he submitted the information he needed to make his application complete. We could do a Director's Interpretation as Kirsten suggested during the meeting, but as I told Kirsten and Sam, I had thought we could handle this matter without one. At one point in the meeting Kirsten questioned whether a use permit was needed since the facility was just a bed and breakfast. I said religious facilities required a cup in this zone. One side note, if the Swami had not rezoned this land to the CP Zone from a residential zone about 5 years ago to allow the Hall Office Complex(per representative),we would not have had a problem with the residential components - the swami's residence nor the guest rooms. But it would be very difficult now to rezone it back to residential. Doris Michael, Associate Planner CC: Dick Bewersdorff % ' �- � .. � :� 11_1'FIA FNGINL:ERING, INC'. RECEIVED PLANNING September 20, 1999 SEP 2 9 1999 Julia Hajduk CITY OF TI�,ARD City of Tigard 13125 SW Hall Blvd. Tigard, Or 97223 RE: CUP1999-001, PD1999-00002, VAR1999-00024 Tigarci Ashram - SUU-387 Julia, In response to your message of 9/17/99, the proposed Ashram and temple construction are to be on Tax Lots 1400 and 3503 of Tax Map 1S1 35DA. My understanding is that tax Lot 3500 is involved due to the shared parking agreement only. If you have any more questions, feel free to call me. Sam, at GEOStandards (646-9069) is our client contact, and to my knowledge, will be responsible for handling the project to completion. Thank you, , 1 �--��-��-�-- Hayli Walker Plaza West • Suite 230 • 9600 SW Oak • 1'ortl�u�d. Oregon 97Z23 Office 503-45'1-8003 • Fax 503-452-8043 ��w�w.alpha-eng.com • NOTICE TO MORTGAGEE, UENH� ER,VENDOR OR SELLER: THE TIGARD DEVELOPMENT CODE REQUIRES i�,HT IF YOU RECEIVE THIS NOTICE, IT SHALL BE PROMPTLY FORWARDED TO THE PURCHASER. CITY OF iIGARD Community�Dec�eCopment Shaping A Better Community PUBLIC HEARING NOTICE NOTICE IS HEREBY GIVEN THAT THE TIGARD PLANNING COMMISSION. AT A MEETING ON MONDAY. NOVEMBER 22, 1999 AT 7:30 PM, IN THE TOWN HALL OF THE TIGARD CIVIC CENTER, 13125 SW HALL BOULEVARD, TIGARD, OREGON 97223 TO CONSIDER THE FOLLOWING APPLICATION: FILE NO(S).: CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT[CUPI 1999-00001 PLANNED DEVELOPMENT REVIEW[PDRI 1999-00002 VARIANCE NARI 1999-00024 SETBACK A�IUSTMENT[MISI 1999-00026 FILE TITLE: SWAMI VISWA TEMPLE E1(PANSION APPLICANT/ PLANNING OWNER: Swami Viswa Premananda CONSULTANT: Alpha Engineering 11515 SW Hall Boulevard Mike Miller, Project Manager Tigard, OR 97223 Plaza West, Suite 230 9600 SW Oak Street Portland, OR 97223 REQUEST: The applicant has requested Conditional Use Approval to expand the existing Ashram (temple). The applicant is also requesting Planned Development approval to allow the residential use of two bedrooms for the residents and eight guestrooms. A variance has been requested to the access width. An adjustment to the front yard setback for a religious facility has also been requested. LOCATION: The site is located at 11515 SW Hall Boulevard. The properties are also identified as WCTM 1 S135DA, Tax Lots 1400 and 3503. ZONE: C-P; Professional Commercial. APPLICABLE REVIEW CRITERIA: Community Development Code Chapters 18.330, 18.370, 18.390, 18.510, 18.530, 18.705, 18.745, 18.765, 18.775, 18.790, 18.795 and 18.810. THE PUBLIC HEARING ON THIS MATTER WILL BE CONDUCTED IN ACCORDANCE WITH THE RULES OF CHAPTER 18.390 OF THE COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT CODE AND RULES OF PROCEDURE ADOPTED BY THE TIGARD PLANNING COMMISSION AND CITY COUNCIL AND AVAILABLE AT CITY HALL. ASSISTIVE LISTENING DEVICES ARE AVAILABLE FOR PERSONS WITH IMPAIRED HEARING. THE CITY WILL ALSO ENDEAVOR TO ARRANGE FOR QUALIFIED SIGN LANGUAGE INTERPRETERS AND QUALIFIED BILINGUAL INTERPRETERS UPON REQUEST. PLEASE CALL (503) 639-4171, EXT. 320 (VOICE) OR (503) 684-2772 (TDD - TELECOMMUNICATIONS DEVICES FOR THE DEAF) NO LESS THAN ONE WEEK PRIOR TO THE HEARING TO MAKE ARRANGEMENTS. CUP1999-00001/SWAM1 VISWA TEMPLE EXPANSION NOTICE OF 11/22/99 PLANNING COMMISSION PUBLIC HEARIN( ANYONE WISHING TO PRESENT 1 -TEN TESTIMONY ON THIS PROPC ACTION MAY DO SO IN WRITING PRIOR TO OR AT THE PUBLIC HEA��G. ORAL TESTIMONY MAY BE PRES"�TED AT THE PUBLIC HEARING. AT THE PUBLIC HEARING, THE PLANNING COMMISSION WILL RECEIVE A STAFF REPORT PRESENTATION FROM THE CITY PLANNER, OPEN THE PUBLIC HEARING, AND INVITE BOTH ORAL AND WRITTEN TESTIMONY. THE PLANNING COMMISSION MAY CONTINUE THE PUBLIC HEARING TO ANOTHER MEETING TO OBTAIN ADDITIONAL INFORMATION OR CLOSE THE PUBLIC HEARING AND TAKE ACTION ON THE APPLICATION. IF A PERSON SUBMITS EVIDENCE OR DOCUMENTS LESS THAN 7 DAYS PRIOR TO THE PUBLIC HEARING DATE, THE HEARINGS AUTHORITY MAY ALLOW A CONTINUANCE OF THE HEARING, SUBJECT TO ORS 215.428 OR 227.178. IF THERE IS NO CONTINUANCE GRANTED AT THE HEARING, ANY PARTICIPANT IN THE HEARING MAY REQUEST THAT THE RECORD REMAIN OPEN FOR AT LEAST SEVEN (7) DAYS AFTER THE HEARING. A REQUEST THAT THE RECORD REMAIN OPEN CAN BE MADE ONLY AT THE FIRST EVIDENTIARY HEARING (ORS 197.763(6). INCLUDED IN THIS NOTICE IS A LIST OF APPROVAL CRITERIA APPLICABLE TO THE REQUEST FROM THE TIGARD COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT CODE AND THE TIGARD COMPREHENSIVE PLAN. APPROVAL OR DISAPPROVAL OF THE REQUEST BY THE PLANNING COMMISSION WILL BE BASED UPON THE CRITERIA LISTED OR OTHER CRITERIA IN THE COMPREHENSIVE PLAN OR DEVELOPMENT CODE WHICH THE PERSON BELIEVES TO APPLY TO THE DECISION. AT THE HEARING IT IS IMPORTANT THAT COMMENTS RELATING TO THE REQUEST PERTAIN SPECIFICALLY TO THE APPLICABLE CRITERIA IN THE COMPREHENSIVE PLAN OR THE DEVELOPMENT CODE. FAILURE TO RAISE AN ISSUE IN PERSON OR BY LETTER AT SOME POINT PRIOR TO THE CLOSE OF THE HEARING ON THE REQUEST, ACCOMPANIED BY STATEMENTS OR EVIDENCE SUFFICIENT TO ALLOW THE HEARINGS AUTHORITY AND ALL PARTIES TO RESPOND PRECLUDES AN APPEAL, AND FAILURE TO SPECIFY THE CRITERION FROM THE COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT CODE OR COMPREHENSIVE PLAN AT WHICH A COMMENT IS DIRECTED PRECLUDES AN APPEAL TO THE LAND USE BOARD OF APPEALS BASED ON THAT ISSUE. ALL DOCUMENTS AND APPLICABLE CRITERIA IN THE ABOVE-NOTED FILE ARE AVAILABLE FOR INSPECTION AT NO COST OR COPIES CAN BE OBTAINED FOR TWENTY-FIVE CENTS (25�) PER PAGE, OR THE CURRENT RATE CHARGED FOR COPIES AT THE TIME OF THE REQUEST. AT LEAST SEVEN (7) DAYS PRIOR TO THE HEARING, A COPY OF THE STAFF REPORT WILL BE AVAILABLE FOR INSPECTION AT NO COST, OR A COPY CAN BE OBTAINED FOR TWENTY-FIVE CENTS (25�) PER PAGE, OR THE CURRENT RATE CHARGED FOR COPIES AT THE TIME OF THE REQUEST. FOR FURTHER INFORMATION PLEASE CONTACT THE STAFF PLANNER lulia Powell Haiduk AT (503)639-4171, TIGARD CITY HALL, 13125 SW HALL BOULEVARD, TIGARD, OREGON 97223. �..., � � tD ._.�_ � '___ _�TJ �.<<.....�,..o...-,. -.. L..S , VICINITY MAP ' I �Y ' _-- ___ — i __ ________= ��-i- �'� F—� CUP1999-DOv01 I� � I � �-,i PDR1999-00002 j ' �I,IL� r—i VAR1999-OD0�4 I I � �—', -MIS 1999�00026_ � � �� I SWAMI VISWA ° TEMPLE EXPANSION \.�BJECT I , �TAX LOTS LE �� r— I� I ` � . �' � � I a I �; I - j � I -- ---'r LOMITA � N �` i � �-- � ,.n�� r � � ��c�p . c�y o� � �� _ ° �� .... o.._ CUP1999-00001/SWAMI VISWA TEMPLE EXPANSION NOTICE OF 11/22/99 PLANNING COMMISSION PUBLIC HEARING � � :'�I I'11A t-;NC_�INI:E:F2ING, lNC'. November 3, 1999 Ms. Julia Hajduk City of Tigard C^�munit� DevPlop�r.er�* !�e;artr;pr�t 13125 SW Hall, PO Box 23397 Tigard, OR 97223 FAX: 684-7297 RE: Tigard Ashram (1 1515 SW Hall Boulevard, Tigard Request for Continuance of Planning Commission Hearing Job No. 500-387 Dear Julia: Per our phone conversation yesterday afternoon, the applicant requests a continuance from the scheduled hearing date of November 22"d until the next available hearing which is December 6th, 1999. As this request is to accommodate the applicant's schedule, they are amenable to extending the 120 day processing limit an additional three weeks. Upon reflecting on the issues raised at yesterdays meeting with Sam, myself, Jim Waddle, Kris Londahl, Brian Rager, and yourself, we agree with you that the current layout proposed for the parking lot does not appear to be an acceptable alternative. Its minimal access widths coupled with a parking lot that would completely "landlocks" the currently undeveloped adjacent property (and renders it undevelopable (except by Nedelesky). Accordingly, this proposal violates not only fire access requirements but also other City development codes. Although this property owner was not represented yesterday, we appreciate that you and your staff are "doing the right thing" by not recommending approval of this parking layout. In attempting to find a solution for this collection of piecemeal projects it naturally occurred to us that there may be a "neighborhood circulation plan" that could address the current problems that the owners and the City are experiencing, namely: Plaza Wr�st • Suitr, Z30 �9600 tiW Uak • Yortland, Oreguu 9;l'�3 Office 503-452-8003 • Fax 503-452-8043 •w�+•w.ul��h�-r�n�.cum � • City's access and safety issues • Serving of the currently undevPloped site • Providing additiorzal development opportunities • Accommodating additional parking • Providing a more attractive and focused entry into the complex • Creation of an office park environment rather than a piecemeal development. It will not involve "magic" but rather a group planning exercise and some flexibility by the affected owners. As a starting point, I would like to show you and Brian some ipeas ti-nat Sam ana f aiscussed. Give me a cail ana �ve can meet to review some of these neighborhood circulation plans or ratherr "office park" concepts. Thanks again for attempting to bring the property owners together to resolve these issues. We appreciate your assistance with this project thus far, as well as your prompt review of our submittal materials. Please let me know when might be a convenient time for us to meet. Sincerely, ALPHA ENGINEERING, IfVC. I�!' � �� . �. �� Mike Miller Project Manager f NOV 03 '99 06�32PM RLPHA ENGINEERIN_ P. 1/2 ALP1tA ENGINEERING, INC. Novem6er 3, 1999 Ms. Julia Najduk City of Tigard Community Development Department 13125 SW Hall, PO 6ox 23397 . Tigard, OR 97223 FAX: 684-7297 RE: Tigard Ashram (11515 SW Hall Bo�levard, Tigard Request for Continuance of Planning Commission Hearing Job No. 500-387 Dear Juiia: Per our phone conversation yesterday afternoon, the applicant requests a continuance from the scheduled hearing date of November 22nd unt'ri the next availabfe hearing which is Dec�mber 6th, 1999. As this request is to accommodate the applicant's schedule, they are amenable to exiending the i 20 day processing limit an additional three weeks, Upon reflecting on the issues raised at yesterdays meeting with Sam, myself, Jim Waddle, Kris Londahl, 6rian Rager, and yourself, we agree with you that the current Iayout proposed for the parking lot does not appear to be an acceptable alternative. Its minimal access widihs coupled with a parking lot that would completely "landlocks" the currently undeve[oped adjacent propeRy (and renders it undevelopable (except by Nedeles[cy}, Accordingly, this proposal violates not only fire access requirements but also other City development codes. Although this property owner was not represented yesterday, we appreciate that you and your staff are "doing the right thing" by not recommending approval of this parking layout. In attempting to find a solution for this collection af piecemeal projects it naturally occurred to us that there may be a "neighborhood circu[ation pfan" that could address the �urrent problems that the owners and the City are experiencing, namely: Plaza Wes[ -Suite 230 •9600 SW Oak -Purtland, Ore:;on 97223 Office 503-452-8Q03 • Fax 503-�52-8043 •wrww.slpha-en�.com � NOV 03 '99 06�32PM ALPHA EN6INEERING P.2i2 • City`s access and safety issues • Serving of the currently undeveloped site • Providing additional development opportunities • Accommodating additiona! parking • Providing a more attractive and focused entry into the complex � Creation of an office park environment rather than a piecemeal development. It will not involve "magic" but rather a group planning exercise and some flexibility by the affected owners. As a starting point, I would like to show you and Brian some ideas that Sam and I discussed, Give me a call and we can meet to review some of Lhese neighborhood circulation plans or rather "a#fice park" concepts, Thanks again for attempting to bring the property owners together to rESOlve these issues. We apprecia#e your assistance with this project thus far, as well as your prompt review of our submittaf materials. Please let me know when might be a conveniEnt time for us to meet. Sincerely, ALPHA EN6INEERING, INC. � �~r'';r ,.•�. . :'� ��' •'",� ��' ,� - 6c,C'' "'��"'��—�''-�=:� Mike MillEr Project Manager 1 COMMUNITY NEWSPAPERS, INC. Le9a� P.O.BOX 370 PHONE(503)684�0360 NOIiC� !;'; 9 5 7 9 BEAVERTON,OREGON 97075 The following will be considered by the Tigard Plenning Commission on Monday,November 22,1999,at 7:30 P.M.,at Tigard Civic Center— Legel NOtICe Advefti8ing .Town Hall;131?5 SW hlal�Blvd.,Tigard,Oregon.Bo[h public,oral and wri«en testimony is invited.The public heaeing on'this matter will be' � • O Tearsheet Notice conducted in accordance with the rules of Chapter 18.390 of the Tigard Ci*yo uf Tiqar�3/Planninq MunicipalCode,andrulesandproceduresoftheHearingsOfficer.Fa�lhre �13125 SW I3a11 Blvd. • ❑ Duplicate Affidavit �o raise aa issue in person or by letter,accompanied by slatements or igdrd,Or.egon 97 223 evidence sufficien[to allow the hearings authoriry and all par[ies to respond,precludes an appeal,and failure to specify the criterion from the • � Communrty Development Code or Comprehensive Plan at which a Accounts Payable al based on that criierion.Further commen[is directed precludes an appe information may be obtained from the Planning Division at 13125 SW Hall Hlvd.,Tigard,Oregon 97223,or by calling(503)639-4171. PUBLIC HEARING: AFFIDAVIT OF PUBLICATION CONllITIOrAL USE PERMIT(CUP)19Y9-W001 STATE OF OREGON, ) , PLANNED DEVELOPMENT REVIEW(PDR)1999•OOM12 VARIANCE{VAR)1999-00024 and COUN7Y OF WASHINGTON, )as' ETBACK ADJUSTMENT(M1S)1999-00026 i' '' i SWAMI VISWA TEMPLE EXPANSION< beinp f rat d ly s or�n,depose and say that I am the Adverhsmq , REQUEST:The applicant has requested Conditional Use Approval lo Director,or his principai clerk,of them_�a rd—"'na 7 at i n T�meS expand the existing Ashram(temple).The applicant is also requesting e newspaper of generel circulation as defined in OFS 193.010 Planned Development approval to allow the residential use of two and 193.020;publiahed at �'iga rri in the � bedrooms for lhe residents and eight guestrooms.A varixnce has been aforesaid county and state;that the requested to the access width.An adjustment to the front yazd setback for Pnht; t� r;�R/�Pm 7 P T'x n c i on-4o��mi V i se�a a roligious facility has also been requested.LOCATION:The sile is � '�� located at 11515 SW Hall Blvd.The properties are also identified as a printed copy of which is hereto annexed,was published in the WCTM 1SI35DA Tax Lot 1406 and 3503.ZONES:C-P;Professional ent'ue iasue of said newspaper for �TIE auccessive end De e opmen't C de ChapteB e El8 E0.1 SW��R18.390IA8.510,18530 consecutive in the followinq issues: L8.705,18.745.16.765,18.775,18.790,18.795 and 18.810. ` . ,s- - C i_i_'( - ��I t h r d 1 Q Q Q _ I � , _ I, _ � . _ i ; , U viuwm ruv t' - � . `' I ��r w� I . i ,_ ...�.� �. ,� �... 1 r ,»;�; � `u-�i'i� ,. , �',......,. i �. F � � ,��. � I .; _ � _ —�- . ,�._ _ w.e.. �.�u •,fl v� �� _�r s �.,.�....e. i u : � i-;i ti , Subscribed and swom to efore me thisdth A�� of T�^�°*^ber,1999 r_I ��p; � _I ^14°.-� ,Q i' . � ! �' � I �j I �I / � 1.J�c�.,a-�-. I ; ti''r f_ � � Not Public for Orepon � �_.� � __..�I f.�'.— �1��4_ ' � ,I � My Commiasion Expires: M�COI _ _�� '. I �.._ ��, �� f�:� �F � � � a i ' '� --I AFFIDAVIT � ,J�� I� �I I ...I � ��.�� ':`. � . � � ,,•� � /� � � , � � � i 9P __� `' yT. {' �� & y�C./' �_.,_I ,,.:I � � I` 1, ,.,.1- --� _. � TT9519—Publish November 4,1999. � `\ J � � � � � � DATE: (' �� PLANS CHECK NO. ��'�X' � PROJECT TITLE: �, �' /i_ �' I ? � r.�' �/ /�' / COUNTYWIDE TRAFFIC IMPACT FEE WO RKS H E ET APPLICANT (FOR NON-SINGLE FAMILY USES) MAILINGADDRESS: C ITY/ZI P/P HON E: TAX MAP NO.: SITES NO.ADDRESS: LAND USE CATEGORY �E PER TRIP RESIDENTIAL $201.00 BUSINESS AND COMMERCIAL $ 51.00 � OFFICE $ 184.00 ' '� " ^' �' � r INDUSTRIAL $ 19�.00 � � `� INSTITUTIONAL $ $3.00 !` , �j , -- �.� `� ;''v � PAYMENT METHOD: -- - CASH/CHECK M CREDIT BANCROFT(PROMISSORY NOTE) ;, 7. ?U .i.� f-� � --��'i � ' INSTITUTIONAL ONLY: DEFER TO OCCUPANCY LAND USE CATEGORY DESCRIPTION OF USE WEEKDAY AVG. WEEKEND AVG.TRIP RATE ,�N�r/��' TRIPRATE 7. o �-/l BASIS: j; � �i ,� .- % . 1-' � �.�C. 1f� /,� � C� r:'. j- � �.,. � � � � � _� _ �. i �( - , � r , _ � , CALCULATIONS: � �SS �� N � r ` r 7 �, � . � , - �, f_� j�� '� " . � X \�•�G x � ) t (I �.I� t ,%�� )C b °' _ � � __ S, .�O(� � ---�� '�'�a , ��l 9�-a�iu,F� -/o - gC�-a' r,e,os TQrP�'�fA�TB ' / PROJECT TI�IP NERATION: �'" � � �� ti �� i� �� .�,. �"-� �: C / // T,e��5 �� - � � , � L� .: ,,, k � .� �. CL I� _ � � � - — �, c ' FEE: �i�� S�W� FOR ACCOUNTING PURPOSES ONLY ADDITIONAL NOTES: ROAD AMT.: TRANSIT AMT.: P EP7�R�Bj ' (-� L.r�._ I:TIFWKST.DOC (DST) EFF: 07-01-98 .J r . J � � - �. , ��, �: . . � , .. .�- '_� (�� .._ v-J._i,__ � [. }, >__ � � ��! 1 a_' C'--.J�. C�.A �`-- '.�-�i��.'- ' �'_��.. � I C.� Lri.:)l.�--•..1.�-'[`,,� II�.R�- - �- (/ -/ �O � �� - Land Use: 560 — � Church � Description i A church is a building providing public worship senrices, and generally houses an assembly hall or sanctuary, meeting rooms, classrooms, and occasionally dining, catering, or parry facilities. Additional Data Information on transit trip ends is not available. �I�' Information on person trip ends is not available. I�I . �� Information on truck trips is not available. I' Information on vehicle occupancy is not available. I� �i; ' � Peak hours of the generator. ! Weekdays 10:00 A.M. to 12:00 Noon and 7:00 P.M. to 11:00 P.M. f� Saturdays 5:00 P.M. to 8:00 P.M. � Sundays 9:00 A.M. to 1:00 P.M. � �'i ry� � These studies were conducted in the mid-1970's to mid-1980's at churches throughout the United States. � Source Numbers 90, 120, 169, 170 � /� /��% _�.1 ; � �t �L �C�_-i1%�� `r'..�� .�� --N/��-�. lil7�--�L. � � / � `' � ��'; i . � �o-r,c'r !��Vi" C.,C��(.Y C�-ri:.: � C� 1� ��u�-� � �' �`-��`_� '�� ', � i � i � '.� � —�J✓/ ,�,�. �i�+�:�--'"-rr Lt ri �1'P �/� �°l , �!✓ � '� � �._��"'-.��__.I"'.��•�=4�'� ✓'� � -�_.. � �I i ' � �� . , fJ ,�/,�. �' // jr _� , , C.0'4:. /;/�"� `�"�`" - �-�` � ``�j�.�__,,�-�..�.� �e.r c?-�C-.n � .�_� ,��',. . ��._ <� i � , � � � c� �.-f��.� � ��-�.�� , �o �-� .�� ., , , , /' �2 . /} � /e� .�r - � �'// �i, � � ✓�� ;� d-1 x. � C�G'",t�t t i'. ' L t_. 5�.:.�.y` , �i-d-�`!.�c1-�c�--� �C-d.� O� d C� � l��,n7t.,;,�t, r ._ . _ � n D� �� , � � Trip Generation,January 1991 812 Institute of Transportation Engineers ;, � NOTICE TO MORTGAGEE, LIENHff 'R,VENDOR OR SELLER: THE TIGAF�D DEVELOPMENT CODE REQUIRES . �r YOU RECEIVE THIS NOTICE, IT Sf-iALL BE PROMPTLY FORWARDED TO THE PURCHASER CITY OF TIGARD Community�Development NOTICE OF "RESCHEDULED" S6npingABetterCommunity PUBLIC NEARING NOTICE IS HEREBY GIVEN THAT THE NOVEMBER 12. I 999 PLANNING COMMISSION MEETING HAS BEEN RESCHEDULED TO MONDAY� DECEMBER 6, 1999 AT 7:30 PM IN THE TOWN HALL, OF THE TIGARD CIVIC CENTER, 13125 SW HALL BOULEVARD, TIGARD, OREGON 97223 TO CONSIDER THE FOLLOWING APPLICATION: FILE NO(S).: CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT[CUPI 1999-00001 PLANNED DEVELOPMENT RE111EW[PDRI 1999-00002 YARIANCE NARI 1999-00024 SETBACK ADIUSTMENT[MISI 1999-00026 FILE TITLE: SWAMI VISWA TEMPLE EIiPANSION APPLICANT/ PLANNING OWNER: Swami Viswa Premananda CONSULTANT: Aipha Engineering 11515 SW Hall Boulevard Mike Miller, Project Manager Tigard, OR 97223 Plaza West, Suite 230 9600 SW Oak Street . Portland, OR 97223 REQUEST: The applicant has requested Conditional Use Approval to expand the existing Ashram (temple). The applicant is also requesting Planned Development approval to allow the residential use of two bedrooms for the residents and eight guestrooms. A variance has been requested to the access width. An adjustment to the front yard setback for a religious facility has also been requested. LOCATION: The site is located at 11515 SW Hall Boulevard. The properties are also identified as WCTM 1 S135DA, Tax Lots 1400 and 3503. ZONE: C-P; Professional Commercial. APPLICABLE REVIEW CRITERIA: Community Development Code Chapters 18.330, 18.370, 18.390, 18.510, 18.530, 18.705, 18.745, 18.765, 18.775, 18.790, 18.795 and 18.810. THE PUBLIC HEARING ON THIS MATTER WILL BE CONDUCTED IN ACCORDANCE WITH THE RULES OF CHAPTER 18.390 OF THE COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT CODE AND RULES OF PROCEDURE ADOPTED BY THE TIGARD PLANNING COMMISSION AND CITY COUNCIL AND AVAILABLE AT CITY HALL. ASSISTIVE LISTENING DEVICES ARE AVAILABLE FOR PERSONS WITH IMPAIRED HEARING. THE CITY WILL ALSO ENDEAVOR TO ARRANGE FOR QUALIFIED SIGN LANGUAGE INTERPRETERS AND QUALIFIED BILINGUAL INTERPRETERS UPON REQUEST. PLEASE CALL (503) 639-4171, EXT. 320 (VOICE) OR (503) 684-2772 (TDD - TELECOMMUNICATIONS DEVICES FOR THE DEAF) NO LESS THAN ONE WEEK PRIOR TO THE HEARING TO MAKE ARRANGEMENTS. CUP1999-00001/SWAMI VISWA TEMPLE EXPANSION "RESCHEDULED PUBLIC HEARING DATE NOTICE OF 12/6/99 PLANNING COMMISSION PUBLIC HEARING ANYONE WISHING TO PRESENT TTEN TESTIMONY ON THIS PROF �J ACTION MAY DO SO IN WRITING PRIOR TO OR AT THE PUBLIC HEr,��...,G. ORAL TESTIMONY MAY BE PR�� TED AT THE PUB�IC HEARING. AT THE PUBLIC HEARING, THE PLANNING COMMISSION WILL RECEIVE A STAFF REPORT PRESENTATION FROM THE CITY PLANNER, OPEN THE PUBLIC HEARING, AND INVITE BOTH ORAL AND WRITTEN TESTIMONY. THE PLANNING COMMISSION MAY CONTINUE THE PUBLIC HEARING TO ANOTHER MEETING TO OBTAIN ADDITIONAL INFORMATION OR CLOSE THE PUBLIC HEARING AND TAKE ACTION ON THE APPLICATION. IF A PERSON SUBMITS EVIDENCE OR DOCUMENTS LESS THAN 7 DAYS PRIOR TO THE PUBLIC HEARING DATE, THE HEARINGS AUTHORITY MAY ALLOW A CONTINUANCE OF THE HEARING, SUBJECT TO ORS 215.428 OR 227.178. IF THERE IS NO CONTINUANCE GRANTED AT THE HEARING, ANY PARTICIPANT IN THE HEARING MAY REQUEST THAT THE RECORD REMAIN OPEN FOR AT LEAST SEVEN (7) DAYS AFTER THE HEARING. A REQUEST THAT THE RECORD REMAIN OPEN CAN BE MADE ONLY AT THE FIRST EVIDENTIARY HEARING (ORS 197.763(6). INCLUDED IN THIS NOTICE IS A LIST OF APPROVAL CRITERIA APPLICABLE TO THE REQUEST FROM THE TIGARD COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT CODE AND THE TIGARD COMPREHENSIVE PLAN. APPROVAL OR DISAPPROVAL OF THE REQUEST BY THE PLANNING COMMISSION WILL BE BASED UPON THE CRITERIA LISTED OR OTHER CRITERIA IN THE COMPREHENSIVE PLAN OR DEVELOPMENT CODE WHICH THE PERSON BELIEVES TO APPLY TO THE DECISION. AT THE HEARING IT IS IMPORTANT THAT COMMENTS RELATING TO THE REQUEST PERTAIN SPECIFICALLY TO THE APPLICABLE CRITERIA IN THE COMPREHENSIVE PLAN OR THE DEVELOPMENT CODE. FAILURE TO RAISE AN ISSUE IN PERSON OR BY LETTER AT SOME POINT PRIOR TO THE CLOSE OF THE HEARING ON.THE REQUEST, ACCOMPANIED BY STATEMENTS OR EVIDENCE SUFFICIENT TO ALLOW THE HEARINGS AUTHORITY AND ALL PARTIES TO RESPOND PRECLUDES AN APPEAL, AND FAILURE TO SPECIFY THE CRITERION FROM THE COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT CODE OR COMPREHENSIVE PLAN AT WHICH A COMMENT IS DIRECTED PRECLUDES AN APPEAL TO THE LAND USE BOARD OF APPEALS BASED ON THAT ISSUE. ALL DOCUMENTS AND APPLICABLE CRITERIA IN THE ABOVE-NOTED FILE ARE AVAILABLE FOR INSPECTION AT NO COST OR COPIES CAN BE OBTAINED FOR TWENTY-FIVE CENTS (25C) PER PAGE, OR THE CURRENT RATE CHARGED FOR COPIES AT THE TIME OF THE REQUEST. AT LEAST SEVEN (7) DAYS PRIOR TO THE HEARING, A COPY OF THE STAFF REPORT WILL BE AVAILABLE FOR INSPECTION AT NO COST, OR A COPY CAN BE OBTAINED FOR TWENTY-FIVE CENTS (25�) PER PAGE, OR THE CURRENT RATE CHARGED FOR COPIES AT THE TIME OF THE REQUEST. FOR FURTHER INFORMATION PLEASE CONTACT THE STAFF PLANNER IUIIB POWCII NBjdllk AT (503)639-4171, TIGARD CITY HALL, 13125 SW HALL BOULEVARD,TIGARD, OREGON 97223. ir_�-- F-- --� ..........,..............,_ ; �- ��. - � �� VICINITY MAP I � � �� I � ____________ !�,� � �� _� CUP1999-00001 ' -- -- r--;�; � I PDR1999-00002 � � VAR1999-00024 , �_SL� ,�_ — MI51999-00026 —�� - ------ �--1 � �, _ ------______ - - N--C� < SWAMI VISWA m � TEMPLE EXPAHSION -- v,---. �-- i i �-- � 2 SUBJECT _ �_ I '. TAX LOTS � �- ------ � ' G.- i � -- �; � — I � `-_;�_ j \ :�./`~ -- � ; ,� - -N__ ,. _ � � .._.m .^7 � � � ( rt�—�� _I�- N �l �� _�� - ' _�//-__ l� / \\ � �� f / II �.w�..� ^ \/�_ 1 � _ _ � _—. ' ] 'L� � . — . .W�� p c.r on�w^a / .. y" ol I �� --a s�� -- --��, _1 ,-� - -' C �. . ��..,...__ � CUP1999-00001/SWAMI VISWATEMPLE EXPANSION "RESCHEDULED PUBLIC HEARING DATE' NOTICE OF 12/6/99 PLANNING COMMISSION PUBLIC HEARING COMMUNITY NEWSPAPERS, INC. Le9a, P.O. BOX 370 PHONE(503)684-0360 NotiCe TT 9 5 2 3 BEAVERTON,OREGON 97075 , - --- Legal Notice Advertising The following will be considered by the Tigard Planning Commission on Monday,December 6,1999,at 7:30 P.M.,at,the Tigard Civic Center –Town Hall, 13125 SW Hall Blyd.,Tigard,Oregon. `' ' � •City of Tigar.d/Planning • ❑ Tearsheet Notice Both public oral and written testimony are invited.The public hearing on 13125 SVd Hall Blvd, this matter,will be conducted in accordance with Chapter 18.390 of the • Tigard,Oregon 97 2 7.3 • ❑ Duplicate Affidavit Tigard Municipal Code,and rules and procedures of the Planning Com- mission. • •Accounts Pa able Failure to raise an issue in person or by letter at some point prior to the Y � close of the hearing accompanied by statements or evidence sufficient to allow the Hearings Authority and all the parties to respond on the request, precludes an appeal, and failure to specify the criterion from the Com- munity Development Code or Comprehensive Plan at which a comment is directed precludes an appeal to the Land Use Board of Appeals based on AFFIDAVIT OF PUBLICATION that criterion.Further information may be obtained from the Planning STATE OF OREGON, ) Division at 13125 SW Hall Blvd,,Tigard,Oregon 972,23,or by calling COUNTY OF WASHINGTON, )SS' 639-4171. PUBLIC HEARING ITEM: �, Kath� Sn��der CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT[CUP]1999-00001 being first duly sworn, depose and say that I am the Advertising PLANNED DEVELOPMENT REVIEW[PDR]1999-00002 Director, or his principal clerk, of theT; qar�3–mua 1 at i n Times •-°��'°�`�'ARIANCE[VAR)1999-00024 and a newspaper of general circulation as defined in ORS 193.010 SETBACK ADJUSTMENT[MIS]1999-00026 , , and 193.020; published at Ti�arci in the � >SWA1�1I VISWA TEMPLE EXPANSION<' aforesaid county and state; that the The applicant has requested Conditional Use Approva!to expand the ex- P„hl ; r� HP ri nq/Swami Vi swa TPm�I a F'.xnanGion isting Ashram (temple),. The applicant is also requesting Planned a rinted co y of which is hereto annexed, was ublished in the Development approval to allow the residential use of two bedrooms for P P P the residents and eight guestrooms.A,variance has been requested to the entire issue of said newspaper for ONE successive and access width. An adjustment to the front yard setback for a religious consecutive in the following issues: •facility has also been requested. LOCATION: The site is located at �11515 SW Hall Blvd. The properties are also identified as WCTM Plovember 1 t�,19 9 9 1 S 135DA Tax Lots 1400 and 3503:ZONES:C-P Professional Commer- cial.APPLICABLE REVIEW CRITERIA:Community Development Code Chapters 18.330, 18.370, 18.390, 18.510;'18:530; 18.705, 18:745, 18.765, 18.775, 18.790, 18.795 and 18.810. ' �., `` _ C _ _ _ _. _. t,-T.I�-- - .. �:.�.,v�c�N� ..�� _. � .�_..� i 1 �i ��. � ..... ........... l -- '�,,�� .....__�-�''..' .� .:� :'f••_1 �curin�_ooaoi Subscribed and sworn to fore me this 1 $t h �7...a af�T.ovpmbe r, 19 9 9 -�r�1II ` ""� ' '` �'- '°"'90'-0°°°2 � _l.�_ILi_JJ.L�� `\.•� ....L� ._.. I "1-- � r�ein�0002a � _ _ — ..... -- ..��...aoo .2� ( ...f... I l____ _ — —� j iEn►LE Dt►utStQM N t Public for Oregon _ — ---�---a ---J —' " 3 SUBJECT � _' 1_ My Commission Expires: MY t _ _ _ '°"LO� - -- l'^'�u- AFFIDAVIT .- _._ �".. - -•- � . � �� . . . � ,L � �, , . � .�� t `I, �� . �� - _-. �, . . . � .,, . .� . ___�_ �� : N .. . l . { � /�`� �:�` - ---� .... �i�i �' � � w� _ �..� ` —-- j =r..�� (, .:� , � � , . .--, �` +� ,� i�f=�F'�2��'� �;XHl�31� A , ��L . , '±��r�'j�`.�sal�r�- �; � � �s� �M ;�ka NOTICE OF DECISION *� � �' �kS1TE DEVELOPMENT REYIEW[SDRI 9?-0014 � � , :�� w` '� � CITY OF TIOARD s�� » VARIANCE [VARI 91-0018 ��`: Cvmmunity Development �� HALL PARK OFFICE CENTER S�p+ng�BetterCommwuty SECTION I. APPLICATION SUMMARY , ; , _ . _ . , , , p' G �:��: x� ,_ � � � 5.; ��i � CASES: FILE NAME: HALL PARK OFFICE CENTER Site Development Review SDR 97-0014 Variance �� T' �I � - �; cc:c Z VAR 97-0018 PROPOSAL: The applicant has requested Site Development Review approval to develop a two story, 32,735 square foot office building and related site improvements. APPLICANT: Mr. Mike Nedelisky OWNER: Brahma Premanada 25 82nd Drive, Suite 102 11515 SW Hall Boulevard Gladstone, OR 97207 Tigard, OR 97223 OWNER: Mr. Mike Nedelisky 25 82nd Drive, Suite 102 COMPREHENSIVE Gladstone, OR 97207 PLAN DESIGNATION: Commercial Professional; C-P. ZONING DESIGNATION: Professional/Administrative Office, Commercial District; C-P. The purpose of the C-P Zoning District is to provide for groups of businesses and offices in centers. Permitted uses include: Professional and Administrative services, Public agency administrative services, Cultural exhibits and library services, Public support facilities, Lodges, fraternal and civic assembly, Postal services, Animal sales and services, Business equipment sales and services, Communication services, Children's day care; Medical and dental services, Research services, and Financial, insurance, and real estate services, among others. LOCATION: ti�8�SW Hall Boulevard; WCTM 1S135DA, Tax Lots 01400, 01800, � 03500�and 03501. The subject property is located west of SW Hall �o`ulevard, south of the 217 Freeway, north and west of the existing Kindercare Day Care Center. APPLICABLE REVIEW CRITERIA: Community Development Code Chapters 18.32, 18.64, 18.100, 18.102, 18.106. 18.108, 18.114, 18.116, 18.120, 18.150 and 18.164. SECTION II. DECISION Notice is hereby given that the City of Tigard Community Development Director's designee has APPRQVED the above request subject to certain conditions of approval. The findings and conclusions on which the decision is based are noted in Section IV. NOTICE OF DECISION SDR 97-0014NAR 97-0018-HALL PARK OFFICE CENTER PAGE 1 OF 14 r�► I�ndscaped planter area� .: at least three (3) feet in width, w�. . is also in compliance with ` the applicable standards. / Visual Clearance Areas: Section 18.102 requires that a clear vision area shall be maintained on the corners of all property adjacent to intersecting right-of-ways or the intersection of a public street and a private driveway. A clear vision area shall contain no vehicle, hedge, planting, fence, wall structure, or temporary or permanent obstruction exceeding three (3) feet in height. The code provides that obstructions that may be located in this area shall be visually clear between three (3) and eight (8) feet in height (trees may be placed within this area provided that all branches below eight (8) feet are removed). A visual clearance area is the triangular area formed by measuring a 30-foot distance along the street right-of-way and the driveway, and then connecting these two (2), 30-foot distance points with a straight line. As indicated on the site plan, no structures are proposed to be located within the Clear Vision Area, as required by this section. Minimum Off-Street Parkinq: Section 18.106.030.(C)(22) requires a minimum of one (1) parking space for each 350 square feet of gross floor area for Professional Services, Financial Services and Personal Services. Based on one (1) space for each 350 square feet of gross floor area, a minimum of 94 parking spaces are required for this project. A total of 102 parking spaces are proposed. A total of five (5) parking spaces will apparently be lost as a land use buffer area for the existing detached single-family residence located to the east of a portion of the parking lot is required. However, after deduction of these spaces the site will still comply with the minimum parking ratio by providing 97 parking spaces. It should be noted that because the site is roughly utilizing the minimum Professional and Administrative Office use category as a parking ratio that other uses such as Medical and Dental office use types would not be permitted unless this use represented a small portion of the total building square footage or additional off-street parking was developed. Medical and Dental uses require one (1) parking space for each 200 square feet of gross floor area. The Americans with Disabilities Act (ADA): Section 18.106.020(M) became effective on January 26, 1992. All parking areas shall be provided with the required numbers and sizes of disabled person parking spaces as specified by applicable State of Oregon and federal standards. All disabled person parking spaces shall be signed and marked on the pavement as required by these standards. This section requires five (5) disabled parking spaces if one hundred and one (101) to one hundred and fifty (150) parking spaces are provided. The plan provides five (5) disabled parking spaces. Because the applicant is proposing to develop 97 parking spaces, the plan currently exceeds the minimum requirement. Bicvcle Parkinq: Section 18.106.020(P) requires one (1) bicycle parking rack space for each 15 vehicular parking spaces in any development. Bicycle parking areas shall not be located within parking aisles, landscape areas, or pedestrian ways. A minimum of seven (7) bicycle parking spaces are required for this development. The plans indicate that a total of ten (10) bicycle parking spaces will be provided which exceeds the minimum standard. NOTICE OF DECISION SDR 97-0014NAR 97-0018-HALL PARK OFFICE CENTER PAGE 6 OF 14 :� Jff-Street Loadinq spa...:s: Section 18.106.080 require� ,at every commercial or / industrial use having floor area of 10,000 square feet or more, shall have at least one (1) off-street loading space on site. This standard is applicable because the building is over 10,000 square feet. The applicant has proposed an inset curved loading area in front of the building to comply with this standard. Because of the office use type that is proposed, large scale trucks "semi" are not expected to service the future users supply needs. For this reason, the loading space, as designed. is found to comply with the loading standard. Access: Section 18.108.080 requires that commercial and industrial uses which require more than 100 parking spaces provide two (2) driveways with a minimum width of 30 feet and a minimum pavement width of 24 feet. Assuming the applicant develops ninety-seven (97) parking spaces the total of all proposed and existing parking spaces that would utilize the existing driveway to SW Hall Boulevard is one- hundred twenty one (121). The applicant has requested a variance to one (1) of the two (2) driveways that are required by this standard. The existing driveway that is to be used exceeds the minimum total width standard at 32 feet of total width. The driveway pavement width also meets the 24-foot minimum standard. Access Variance Section 18.108.150 allows the Director to approve, or approve with conditions, a request for an access variance based on the following findings: It is not possible to share access; The applicant has requested the Variance access for the purpose of sharing access among existing parking spaces than that which would normally be permitted. There are no other alternative access points on the street in question or from another street; The site takes access from SW Hall Boulevard which is designated as an Arterial Street within the City's Comprehensive Plan. Because of the higher traffic volumes, SW Hall Boulevard is designated to accommodate shared or restricted access and is required of all new development with access to SW Hall Boulevard. Because of the developed nature of adjoining properties, altemative points of access are not possible unless the applicant were to purchase and likely demolish an adjoining residence in order to access an altemate street such as SW Lomita Avenue. However, this would route commercial traffic through a residential neighborhood. The access separation requirements cannot be met; The proposed Variance does not involve separation requirements as the variance requests relief from developing a second driveway to serve more than 100 parking spaces. The request is the minimum variance required to provide adequate access; Based on the developed nature of properties adjoining SW Lomita Avenue, a variance from developing a second point of access is the least variance that is possible to afford this to address this requirement. The approved access or access approved with conditions will result in a safe access; Access to this site has been reviewed with the Tualatin Valley Fire District who found that the proposed site access could be revised to comply with applicable Uniform Fire Code standards. A detailed plan review and revisions for compliance with these standards will be required to be completed prior to the issuance of building permits. NOTICE OF DECISION SDR 97-0014NAR 97-0018-HALL PARK OFFICE CENTER PAGE 7 OF 14 � The visual clearance �uirements of Section 18.102 �I be met. Because the • ' applicant is not proposing to construct any site improvements within the Clear Vision Area, the applicant is not impacting the line-of-site condition at the existing driveway intersection on to SW Hall Boulevard. For this reason, this criteria is not found to be applicable. Walkwavs: Section 18.108.050(A) requires that a walkway be extended from the ground floor entrance of the structure to the street that provides the required ingress and egress. Unless impractical, walkways should be constructed between a new development and neighboring developments. Wherever required walkways cross vehicle access-driveways or parking lots, such crossings shall be designed and located for pedestrian safety. Required walkways shall be physically separated from motor vehicle traffic and parking by either a minimum six (6) inch vertical separation (curbed), or a minimum three (3) foot horizontal separation; except that pedestrian crossings of traffic aisles are permitted for distances no greater than 36 feet if appropriate landscaping, pavement markings, or contrasting pavement materials are used. Walkways shall be a minimum of four (4) feet in width, exclusive of vehicle overhangs and obstructions such as mailboxes, benches, bicycle racks, and sign posts, and shall be in compliance with ADA standards. The applicant has proposed to ' construct a walkway from SW Hall Boulevard to the building entrance. The walkway, as proposed, is four (4) feet in width and is physically separated from motor vehicle traffic except where the walkway crosses a driveway that serves an existing detached single-family residence. It is likely that the driveway would be crossed by an additional driveway upon development or redevelopment of the properties adjoining SW Hall Boulevard, but no more direct walkway or other unobstructed walkway alignment is possible without acquiring ROW given the existing development constraints on adjoining properties. Si ns: Section 18.114.130(D) lists the type of allowable signs and sign area permitted in the C-P Zone. All signs shall conform to the provisions listed in this code section. All signs shall be approved through the Sign Permit process as administered by the Development Services Technicians. Mixed Solid Waste and Recvclables Storaqe: Section 18.116 requires that new construction incorporates functional and adequate space for on-site storage and efficient collection of mixed solid waste and source separated Recyclables prior to pick-up and removal by haulers. The applicant must choose one (1) of the following four (4) methods to demonstrate compliance: Minimum Standard, Waste Assessment, Comprehensive Recycling Plan, or Franchised Hauler Review and Sign- Off. The applic�nt will have to submit evidence or a plan which indicates compliance with this section. Regardless of which method chosen, the applicant will have to submit a written sign-off from the franchise hauler regarding the facility location and compatibility. The proposed site plan includes a waste and recycling facility within the proposed parking lot. The applicant shall provide a written sign-off from the hauler regarding the design and location of the trash and recycling container in compliance with this section. Site Develoament Review - Approval Standards• Section 18.120.180(A)(1) requires that a development proposal be found to be consistent with the various standards of the Community Development Code. The applicable criteria in this case are Chapters 18.32, 18.64, 18.100, 18.102, 18.106, 18.108, 18.114, 18.120, 18.150 and 18.164. The proposal's consistency with these Code Chapters is reviewed in the following sections. The proposal contains no elements related to the provisions of Sections 18.80 (Planned Developments); 18.84 (Sensitive Lands); 18.92 (Density Computations); 18.94 NOTICE OF DECISION SDR 97-0014NAR 97-0018-HALL PARK OFFICE CENTER PAGE 8 OF 14 . ��-� � ��. _ _w ��.. � e � ��_3�. a�. � . v � _ e �. o- , _ _ � _.� AGENDA �- City of Tigard TIGARD PLANNING COMMISSION �� DECEMBER 6, 1999 — 7:30 P.M. s��a&r�,.c�, TIGARD CIVIC CENTER - TOWN HALL 13125 SW HALL BOULEVARD TIGARD, OREGON 97223 1. CALL TO ORDER 2. ROLL CALL 3. PLANNING COMMISSION COMMUNICATIONS 4. APPROVE MINUTES 5. PUBLIC HEARINGS 5.1 CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT (CUP) 1999-00001/PLANNED DEVELOPMENT REVIEW (PDR) 1999- 00002NARIANCE (VAR) 1999-00024/SETBACK ADJUSTMENT (MIS) 1999-00026 SWAMI VISWA TEMPLE EXPANSION The applicant has requested Conditional Use Approval to expand the existing Ashram (temple). The applicant is also requesting Planned Development approval to allow the residential use of two bedrooms for the residents and eight guestrooms. A variance has been requested to the access width. An adjustment to the front yard setback for a religious facility has also been requested. LOCATION: The site is located at 11515 SW Hall Blvd. The properties are also identified as WCTM 1S135DA Tax Lot 1400 and 3503. ZONES: C-P; Professional Commercial. APPLICABLE REVIEW CRITERIA: Community Development Code Chapters 18.330, 18.370, 18.390, 18.510, 18.530, 18.705, 18.745, 18.765, 18.775, 18.790, 18.795 and 18.810. 5.2 SUBDIVISION (SUB) 1999-000051PLANNED DEVELOPMENT REVIEW(PDR) 1999-00001 MAPLERIDGE ESTATES SUBDIVISION REQUEST: A Subdivision and Planned Development approval to create 24, single-family attached dwelling units. The applicant is requesting Planned Development overlay designation and conceptual plan and detailed plan review as part of this application. There are wetlands on-site, however, because they are jurisdictional only, no Sensitive Lands Review is required by the City. The applicant is also requesting adjustment of the wetland buffer in accordance with Unified Sewerage Agency (USA) standards. LOCATION: The project site is located on the southwest corner of SW 87th Avenue and SW Locust Street; WCTM 1S135AA, Tax Lots 500, 590 and 600. ZONE: R-12 and R-4.5. APPLICABLE REVIEW CRITERIA: Community Development Code Chapters 18.350 (Planned Developments); 18.390 (Decision Making Procedures); 18.430 (Subdivision); 18.510 (Residential Zoning Districts); 18.705 (Access, Egress and Circulation); 18.715 (Density Computation); 18.720 (Design Compatibility Standards); 18.730 (Exceptions to Development Standards) 18.745 (Landscaping and Screening); 18.765 (Off-Street Parking); 18.775 (Sensitive Lands); 18.780 (Signs); 18.790 (Tree Removal); 18.795 (Visual Clearance Areas); and 18.810 (Street and Utility Improvement Standards). 6. OTHER BUSINESS 7. ADJOURNMENT -' Agenda Item: b. Hearin Date: December 6 1999 Time: 7:30 PM STAFF REPORT TO TNE ^ PLANNING COMMISSION CRY OF TIGARD Cnmmunity Devel�pment FOR TNE CITY OF TICARD, OREGON S�p=��Better�ommun�t� 120 DAYS = 1/12/2000 SECTION I. APPLICATION SUMMARY SWAMI VISWA PREMANANDA TEMPLE ADDITION CASES: Conditional Use Permit CUP1999-00001 Planned Development PDR 1999-00002 Variance VAR 1999-00024 Setback Adjustment MIS 1999-00026 APPLICANT/ Swami Viswa Premananda PLANNING Alpha Engineering OWNERS: 11515 SW Hall Boulevard CONSULTANT: Mike Miller, Project Mgr. Tigard, OR 97223 Plaza West, Suite 230 9600 SW Oak Street - Portland, OR 97223 PROPOSAL: The applicant has requested Conditional Use Approval to construct a temple and Planned Development approval for expansion of the existing Ashram (temple) to allow residential use of two (2) bedrooms for the residents and eight (8) guestrooms. A Variance has been requested to the access width, as well as an Adjustment to the front yard setback for a religious facility has been requested. LOCATION: The subject site is located at 11515 SW Hall Boulevard. The properties are also identified as WCTM 1S135DA, Tax Lots 1400 and 3503. COMPREHENSIVE PLAN and ZONING DESIGNATION: C-P; Professional Commercial. APPLICABLE REVIEW CRITERIA: Community Development Code Chapters 18.330, 18.350, 18.370, 18.390, 18.510, 18.530, 18.705, 18.745, 18.765, 18.775, 18.790, 18.795 and 18.810. SECTION II. STAFF RECOMMENDATION � Staff recommends that the Planning Commission find that the proposed Conditional Use Permit will not adversely affect the health, safety and welfare of the City and meets the Approval Standards for a Conditional Use. Therefore, Staff recommends APPROVAL, subject to the following recommended Conditions of Approval: SWAMI VISWA PREMANANDA TEMPLE ADDITION PAGE 1 OF 23 CUP1999-00001/PDR1999-00002NAR1999-00024/MIS1999-00026 12/6/99 STAFF REPORT TO THE PLANNING COMMISSION CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL �� THE FOLLOWING CONDITIONS SHALL BE SATISFIED PRIOR TO FINAL SITE INSPECTION: (Unless otherwise noted, the Staff contact shall be BRIAN RAGER, Engineering Department 503-639-4171.) THE FOLLOWING CONDITIONS SHALL BE SATISFIED PRIOR TO ISSUANCE OF THE SITE AND/OR BUILDING PERMITS: Planning Conditions: 1. Submit a detail of the bicycle rack. 2. Submit a revised plan that shows three (3 additional bicycle parking spaces will be provided. 3. Submit a revised plan that shows a clearly marked walkway across the access drive/parking lot connecting the existing sidewalk and the proposed sidewalk. 4. Submit a revised plan that shows the 5 proposed parking spaces deleted from the site plan OR the access drive must be widened to provide, at minimum, a 40-foot pavement width. The revised plan must show at least one (1) van accessible handicap space will be provided that includes a 9-foot-wide space with an 8-foot-wide aisle in front of the proposed development. 5. Submit a floor plan that shows the total area dedicated for living facilities (guestrooms and resident's rooms) will be less than 3,460 square feet. 6. Submit a lighting plan indicating the location and intensity of the lighting to be provided. The applicant shall submit details of the lighting plan indicating that the light will be directed away from residential properties. 7. Hours of operation shall be limited to prohibit worship services from being held before 6:00 PM, Mondays through Fridays. 8. Submit a revised plan the clearly states the site size, the amount of impervious surface and the amount of landscaped area on the subject site alone. 9. Submit a revised plan showing setback dimensions that scales accurately. Enqineering Conditions: 10. Prior to issuance of a site and/or building permit, the applicant shall pay an addressing fee in the amount of $30. 11. Additional right-of-way (ROW) shall be conveyed to the State of Oregon, by and through its Department of Transportation, Highway Division, along the frontage of SW Hall Boulevard to increase the right-of-way to 45 feet from centerline. The description shall be tied to the existing right-of-way centerline. Verification that the conveyance has been submitted to the State shall be provided to the City Engineering Department. (For additional information, contact Rick Reeves, Oregon Department of Transportation, right-of-way Section, 123 NW Flanders, Portland, OR 97209-4037; Phone: 731-8461). 12. The applicant's construction plans shall indicate that they will provide an on-site water detention facility designed to meet Unified Sewerage Agency (USA) Design Standards, SWAMI VISWA PREMANANDA TEMPLE ADDITION PAGE 2 OF 23 CUP1999-00001/PDR1999-00002NAR1999-00024/MIS1999-00026 12/6/99 STAFF REPORT TO THE PLANNING COMMISSION - 13. The applicant shal� �,rovide an on-site water quality t�. .,�ty as required by Unified Sewerage Agency Design and Construction Standards (adopted by Resolution and Order No. 96-44). Final plans and calculations shall be submitted to the Engineering Department (Brian Rager) for review and approval prior to issuance of the building permit. In addition, a proposed maintenance plan shall be submitted along with the plans and calculations for review and approval. 14. The applicant shall either place the existing overhead utility lines along SW Hall Boulevard underground as a part of this project, or they shall pay the fee in-lieu of undergrounding. The fee shall be calculated by the frontage of the site that is parallel to the utility lines and will be $27.50 per lineal foot. If the fee option is chosen, the amount will be $880 and it shall be paid prior to issuance of a site and/or building permit. THE FOLLOWING CONDITIONS SHALL BE SATISFIED PRIOR TO A FINAL BUILDING INSPECTION: Enqineerinq Conditions: 15. To ensure compliance with Unified Sewerage Agency Design and Construction Standards, the applicant shall employ the design engineer responsible for the design and specifications of the private water quality facility to perform construction and visual observation of the water quality facility for compliance with the design and specifications. These inspections shall be made at significant stages, and at completion of the construction. Prior to final building inspection, the design engineer shall provide the City of Tigard (Inspection Supervisor) with written confirmation that the water quality facility is in compliance with the design and specifications. Staff Contact: Hap Watkins, Building Division. Planninq Condition: 16. Construct all improvements as shown on the approved plans. Any modifications to plans must be approved by the Planning Division PRIOR to the modification. FAILURE TO SATISFY THE CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL WITHIN 18 MONTHS OF THE EFFECTIVE DATE OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION'S DECISION SHALL RENDER THE PLANNING COMMISSION'S DECISION VOID. SECTION III. BACKGROUND INFORMATION Site HistoN: Staff conducted a computer search for case history on the subject parcels. None of the parcels had previous land use applications on file. The site has a shared parking agreement with the office complex to the north (Hall Corporate Center). When this office was constructed (SDR97-00014NAR97-0008), parking spaces were constructed on the subject site as well and a variance was approved for access width to allow 117 parking spaces from one, 30-foot-wide access drive (97 from the shared parking for Hall Corporate Center and Ashram site and 20 from the daycare site). Vicinity Information: The site is bordered north and east by property zoned C-P and are currently developed with an office complex and a daycare center. The property to the south is zoned R-12 and developed with an apartment complex and the property to the west is zoned R-4.5 and developed with single-family residences. SWAMI VISWA PREMANANDA TEMPLE ADDITION PAGE 3 OF 23 CUP1999-00001/PDR1999-00002NAR1999-00024/MIS1999-00026 12/6/99 STAFF REPORT TO THE PLANNING COMMISSION Site Information and Propc,�al Description: The Site is currently developed with a residential house. The proposal is to continue to use the existing residence as an Ashram (residential dormitory for Monks) and expand it for a total of 4,840 square feet to allow for 2 full-time residents bedrooms and 8 guestrooms. The proposal also involves the construction of a 9,000 square foot temple. The applicant is requesting Variance approval to allow additional parking spaces to be constructed off of a driveway that is already not in conformance with the required dimensions. They are also requesting an Adjustment to the front yard setback for a religious facility. SECTION IV. DECISION MAKING PROCEDURES. PERMITS AND USE: Use Classification: Section 18.130.020 is s e se ategories. The applicant is proposing to build a Temple (Religious Institution) and Ashram (Residential Dormitory Use). The Religious Institution is a Conditional Use in the C-P zone and the residential use is not allowed unless it is part of a planned development. Summar Land Use Permits: Chapter 18.310 e ines t e ecision-ma ang type to which the land-use application is assigned. The adjustment to the front yard setback is a Type I administrative decision. The Variance is a Ty�e II administrative decision. The proposed use (Religious Institution) req,uires a Conditional Use permit which is a Type I(I-HO decision. The requested living fac�lities (residential use) requires a planned development which is a Type III-PC decision. When applications are heard concurrently, the highest review authority hears all applications, therefore, all aspects of this application will be reviewed by the Planning Commission. Decision Makin Procedures: Chapter 18.390 escri es t e ecision-ma ing procedures. Type III-PC procedures apply to quasi-judicial permits and actions that predominantly contain discretionary approval criteria. Type III-PC actions are decided by the Planning Commission with appeals to or review by the City Council. SECTION V. NEIGHBORHOOD COMMENTS No comments were received from surrounding property owners. SECTION VI. SUMMARY OF APPLICABLE CRITERIA A summary of the applicable criteria in this case in the Chapter order in which they are addressed in this report are as follows: A. S ecific Conditional Use Criteria enera pprova riteria Additional Conditions of Approval) B. lanned Develo ment Standards rocess Specific Planned Development Criteria C. A licable Develo ment Code Standards . ariances an �ustments 18.705 (Access, Egress & Circulation) 18.745 Landscaping and Screening) 18.765 Off-Street Parking and Loading Requirements) 18.790 Tree Removal) 18.795 (Visual Clearance) 18.810 (Street and Utility Improvement Standards) D. Additional Planned Development Criteria ' SWAMI VISWA PREMANANDA TEMPLE ADDITION PAGE 4 OF 23 CUP1999-00001/PDR1999-00002NAR1999-00024/MIS1999-00026 12/6/99 STAFF REPORT TO THE PLANNING COMMISSION � SECTION Vil. APPL�.,ABLE REVIEW CRITERIA ANL . iNDINGS Impact Study: Section 18.390.040.B.2.e states that the applicant shall provide an impact study to quantify the effect of development on public facilities and services. For each public facility system and type of impact, the study shall propose improvements necessary to meet City standards, and to minimize the impact of the development on the public at large, public facilities systems, and affected private property users. In situations where the Community Development Code requires the dedication of real propertY interests, the applicant shall either specifically concur with a requirement for public right-of-way dedication, or provide evidence that supports that the real property dedication is not roughly proportional to the projected impacts of the development. Any required street improvements to certain collector or higher volume streets and the Washington County Traffic Impact Fee (TIF) are mitigation measures that are required at the time of development. Based on a transportation impact study prepared by Mr. David Larson for the A-Boy Expansion/Dolan II/Resolution 95-61, TIF's are expected to recapture 32 percent of the traffic impact of new development on the Collector and Arterial Street system. The applicant is being required to dedicate right-of-way to allow an ultimate ri ht-of-way width of 45 feet (approximately 20, feet of right-of-way). The Engineering �epartment has estimated the right-of-way acquisition to be approximately $3 per square foot. It is estimated, therefore, that the value of land being dedicated is $1,920. Upon completion of this development, the applicant will be required to pay TIF's of approximately $12,461. Based on the estimate that total TIF fees cover 32 percent of the impact on ma�or street improvements citywide, a fee that would cover 100 percent of this proJ�ects traffic impact is $38,940 ($j2,461 divided by .32). The difference between the TIF paid and the full impact, is considered an unmitigated impact. Since the TIF paid is $12,461, the unmitigated impact can be valued at $26,479. Given the estimated cost of the half-street improvement and the unmitigated impact, the dedication requirement meets the rough proportionality test related to the impact of the development. A. SPECIFIC CONDITIONAI. USE APPROVAL CRITERIA Section 18.330.010.A states that the purpose of this chapter is to provide standards and procedures under which a conditional use may be permitted, enlarged or altered if the site is appropriate and if other appropriate conditions of approval can be met. There are certain uses which due to the nature of the impacts on surrounding land uses and public facilities require a case-by-case review and analysis. Section 18.330.020.A states that a request for approval for a new conditional use shall be processed as a Type III-HO procedure, as regulated by Chapter 18.390.050, using approval criteria contained in Section 18.330.030A and subject to other requirements in Chapter 18.330. The applicable review criteria in this case include the following chapters of the Community Development Code: 18.330, Conditional Use; 18.350, Planned Development; 18.370, Variances and AdJ'ustments; 18.390 Decision Making Procedures;18.520, Commercial Zoning Districts, 18.530, 18.705, Access, Egress and Circulation; 18.745, Landscaping and Screening; 18.765, Off-Street Parking; 18.790, Tree Removal; 18.795, Visual Clearance Areas; and 18.810, Street and Utility Improvement Standards. The development standards and requirements of these chapters are addressed below. The proposal contains no elements related to the provisions of the followin� chapters: 18.600, Community Plan Area Standards; 18.710, Accessory Residential Units; 18.715, Density Computations; 18.720, Design Compatibility Standards; 18.725, Environmental Performance Standards; 18.730, Exceptions to Development Standard; 18.740, Historic Overlay; 18.742, Home Occupations; 18.750, Manufactured/Mobile Home Regulations; 18.760, Nonconforming Situations; 18.775, Sensitive Lands; 18.780, Temporary Uses; 18.797, Water Resources Overlay District; and 18.798, Wireless Communications Facilities. These chapters are, therefore, found to be inapplicable as approval standards. SWAMI VISWA PREMANANDA TEMPLE ADDITION PAGE 5 OF 23 CUP1999-00001/PDR1999-00002NAR1999-00024/MIS1999-00026 1?J6/99 STAFF REPORT TO THE PLANNING COMMISSION General Approval Criteria ..,r a Conditional Use: Section 18.��.030: �� The site size and dimensions provide adequate area for the needs of the proposed use; The existing site size is 2.25 acres. This report evaluates the proposal and necessary setbacks, landscaping, etc. and as conditioned, the site size is adequate for the needs of the proposed expansion. The characteristics of the site are suitable for the proposed use considering size, shape, location, topography, and natural features; The site is relatively flat. There are trees on the site, but the development has been situated in such a way as to preserve the existing trees. All required public facilities have adequate capacity to serve the proposal; and All public facilities including streets, storm and sanitary sewers, and water have adequate capacity to serve the site as discussed in detail elsewhere in this report. The applicable requirements of the zoning district are met except as modified by this chapter. The following table provides the dimensional standards in the C-P zone, the additional dimensional requirements and approval standards for Religious Institutions specified The Conditional Use Standards Section 18.330.050.B.16 and the dimensions proposed for this development. STANDARD C-P CONDITIONAL USE PROPOSED REQUIREMENT Minimum Lot Size 6,000 sq.ft. 20,000 sq.ft 104,301 sq.ft Minimum Lot Width 50 ft. SAME AS C-P 190'approx.[3] Minimum Setbacks O ft. 25 ft 20 ft."' - Front yard - Side facing street on corner&through lots -- 20 ft N/A - Side yard 0/20 ft[1]. 20 ft 20 ft"' - Rear yard - Side of rear yard abutting more restrictive zoning district 0/20 ft[1]. 20 ft 55 ft"' - Distance between property line and garage entrance Maximum Height 45 ft. SAME AS C-P 23 ft.approx.[3] Maximum Site Coverage[2] 85% SAME AS C-P 36% approx.[3J Minimum Landscape Requirement 15% SAME AS C-P 64% approx.[3J [1] No setback shall be required except 20 feet shall be required where the zone abuts a residential zoning district [2] Includes all buildings and impervious surfaces. [3] Approximate figures are provided where the applicanYs information is not clear or accuracy is questioned. In these instances, more discussion and detail is provided further in this report. "' Dimensions specified on plans. Upon scaling, however,distances appear to be less. This is discussed in more detail further in this report. As identified in the table above, the applicant's plans show that the dimensional standards for the base zone are met. The applicant is requesting an adjustment to the front yard setbac;k dimensions required in the Conditional Use standards. This is discussed further in this report. The applicant's plans do not provide enough clear information for staff to state exactly what, the dimensions are because the applicant has included dimensions for the SWAMI VISWA PREMANANDA TEMPLE ADDITION PAGE 6 OF 23 CUP1999-00001/PDR1999-00002NAR1999-00024/MIS1999-00026 12/6/99 STAFF REPORT TO THE PLANNING COMMISSION • office park to the north, h�Yvever, the difference between the u�,proximate amount and the required amount is so great that staff feels confident the standards are met. A condition of approval should be imposed, however, that requires the applicant to submit detailed information on the size of the site (in square feet), the impervious surface on the site and the landscaped area for the site. In addition, the setback dimensions are also in question because they do not scale off to the dimensions shown. The supplementary requirements set forth in other chapter of this Code including but not limited to Chapter 18.780, Signs, and Chapter 18.360, Site Development Review, if applicable, are met. Other applicable standards of the development code are discussed later in this report. The use will comply with the applicable policies of the Comprehensive Plan. The Comprehensive Plan is implemented by the Community Development Code. Compliance with Comprehensive Plan policies are, therefore, assured by satisfaction of the applicable development standards of the development code as addressed within this report. FINDING: Based on the analysis above, staff can not make a final determination that the General Approval Criteria for a Conditional Use are satisfied. If the applicant complies with the following conditions, staff can find that the standards are met or will be addressed further in this report and conditioned if necessary. CONDITIONS: . Submit a revised plan the clearly states the site size, the amount of impervious surface and the amount of landscaped area on the subject site alone. . Submit a revised plan showing setback dimensions that scales accurately. Additional Conditions of Approval for Conditional Use. Section 18.330.030.6 states that the Hearings Authority may impose conditions on the approval of a conditional use, which are found necessary to ensure the use is compatible with other uses in the vicinity, and that the impact of the proposed use on the surrounding uses and public facilities is minimized. These conditions may include, but are not limited to the following: Limiting the hours, days, place and/or manner of operation; Due to the nature of the use, it is anticipated that the majority of activity will take place on the weekends. However, given that the use shares an access and parking with an office complex, it is recommended to limit the hours of worship to after 6:00 PM Mondays through Fridays. It is acknowledged that some activities associated with a religious institution may take place during the workweek, however, it is important that formal worship services be scheduled with consideration of surrounding uses, and traffic and parking demands. Requiring design features which minimize environmental impacts such as noise, vibration, air pollution, glare, odor and/or dust; There will be no noise, vibration, air pollution, glare, odor and/or dust associated with this use above and beyond what is found in an office type use which is permitted in the underlying zone. In any event, the applicant has proposed buffering and screening between the adjacent residential uses. Requiring additional setback areas, lot area, and/or lot depth or width; Staff feels the existing buffer requirements, as discussed further in this report, are adequate. SWAMI VISWA PREMANANDA TEMPLE ADDITION PAGE 7 OF 23 CUP1999-00001/PDR1999-00002NAR1999-00024/MISt999-00026 12/6/99 STAFF REPORT TO THE PLANNING COMMIS510N Limiting the building heig��t, size or lot coverage, and/or locacion on the site; � Based on the plans submitted, the structures will comply with the height requirements and lot coverage requirements. The location is in accordance with the setbacks, provided the adjustment request is approved. Because of this, staff does not feel an additional condition is necessary. Designating the size, number, location and/or design of vehicle access points; Staff does not feel a condition is necessary for this criteria since, as discussed further in this report, vehicle access is already limited. Requiring street right-of-way to be dedicated and street(s) to be improved; The applicant has approximately 32 feet of frontage on SW Hall Boulevard. The right-of-way is not to the required width of 45 feet from centerline, therefore, the applicant will be required to dedicate additional right-of-way. This is discussed further under Street Utility and Improvement Standards. Requiring landscaping, screening, drainage and/or surfacing of parking and loading areas; The majority of parking is existing. The applicant has proposed to construct 5 additional parking spaces, however, the buildings will be located between any new parking and the adjacent residential areas. The ability to provide additional parking is discussed in detail under the Variance discussion section. Limiting the number, size, location, height and/or lighting of signs; Signs have not been indicated as proposed, however, compliance with the sign requirements for the underlying zone should be sufficient in the event that signs are desired. Limiting or setting standards for the location and/or intensity of outdoor lighting; The applicant has not provided a lighting plan. Because of this, a condition is warranted requiring the applicant to submit a lighting plan indicating the location and intensity of the lighting to be provided. The applicant will be required to submit details of the lighting plan indicating that the light will be directed away from residential properties. Requiring berms, screening or landscaping and the establishment of standards for their installation and maintenance; Buffering and screening is discussed further in this report. Because the use proposed is no more intensive than other uses permitted in this zone, staff does not feel that additional screening, above and beyond what is already required, is necessary. Requiring and designating the size, height, location and/o�' materials for fences; No fences are proposed. Requiring the protection and preservation of existing trees, soils, vegetation, watercourses, habitat areas and/or drainage areas; No trees will be removed as a result of this proposal and there are no watercourses, habitat areas or drainage areas on the site. Requiring the dedication of sufficient open land area for a greenway adjoining and within the floodplain when land form alterations and development are allowed within the 100-year floodplain; and SWAMI VISWA PREMANAN�A TEMPLE ADDITION PAGE 8 OF 23 CUP1999-00001/PDR1999-00002NAR1999-00024/MIS1999-00026 12/6/99 STAFF REPORT TO THE PLANNING COMMISSION � � This development is not �,,.�acent to the 100-year floodplain, _,�erefore, a condition is not necessary. Requiring the construction of a pedestrian/bicycle pathway within the floodplain in accordance with the adopted pedestrian/bicycle pathway plan. This development is not adjacent to the 100-year floodplain, therefore, a condition is not necessary. FINDING: Based on the analysis above, staff finds the following conditions are warranted by this Conditional Use approval. All other conditions listed are not necessary or will be addressed elsewhere in this report. CONDITIONS: . Submit a lighting plan indicating the location and intensity of the lighting to be provided. The applicant shall submit details of the lighting plan indicating that the light will be directed away from residential properties. . Hours of operation shall be limited to prohibit worship services from being held before 6:00 PM, Mondays through Fridays. B. PLANNED DEVELOPMENT APPROVAL CRITERIA Planned Development (18.350): Chapter 18.350 allows the option for an applicant to create a more efficient, economically viable development that preserves natural land features while implementing the land use designation set forth for the property though the Comprehensive Plan. Section 18.350.020.6 states that the Planned Development Review is a three (3)-step process, as follows: 1. The approval of the planned development overlay zone; 2. The approval of the planned development concept plan; and 3. The approval of the Detailed Development Plan. The applicant has requested that this application be for Planned Development Overlay Designation, Conceptual Planned Development and Detailed Planned Development approval to comply with all three steps in the PD process. FINDING: Because this proposal requested all three steps and this report evaluates the proposal for compliance with all standards required to be evaluated, this standard has been met. Allowed Uses: Section 18.350.060.6 states that in all commercial zones, an applicant with a planned development approval may develop the site to contain all of the uses permitted outright in the underlying zone and, in addition, a maximum of 25% of the total gross floor area may be used for multi-family dwellings in those commercial zones that do not list multi-family dwellings as an outright use. The total square footage for all structures will be 13,840 square feet, therefore, only 3,460 square feet is permitted to be used for living areas. The floor plan shown for the Ashram has several areas dedicated for worship, yoga and other group facilities. The applicant has not provided enough detail for staff to confirm that the total living area (guestrooms) will be less than 3,460 square feet. SWAMI VISWA PREMANANDA TEMPLE ADDITION PAGE 9 OF 23 CUP1999-00001/PDR1999-00002NAR1999-00024/MIS1999-00026 12/6✓99 STAFF REPORT TO THE PLANNING COMMISSION FINDING: Because the dpplicant has not provided enough aetail for staff to confirm that the total living area (guest rooms) will be less than 3,460 square feet, this standard has not been met. If the applicant submits a floor plan that shows the total area dedicated for living facilities (guest rooms and resident's rooms) will be less than 3,460 square feet, this standard will be met. CONDITION:Submit a floor plan that shows the total area dedicated for living facilities (guest rooms and residenYs rooms) will be less than 3,460 square feet. Specific Planned Development Approval Criteria. The Commission shall make findings that the following criteria are satisfied when approving or approving with conditions, the concept plan. The Commission shall make findings that the criteria are not satisfied when denying an application. All the provisions of the land division provisions, Chapters 18.410, 18.420 and 18.430, shall be met; This proposal does not involve a division of land, therefore, this standard does not apply. Except as noted, the provisions of the following chapters shall be utilized as guidelines. A planned development need not meet these requirements where a development plan provides alternative designs and methods, if acceptable to the Commission, that promote the purpose of this section. In each case, the applicant must provide findings to justify the modification of the standards in the chapters listed in Subsection 3 below. The developer may choose to provide or the commission may require additional open space dedication and/or provision of additional amenities, landscaping or tree planting. Chapter 18.730, Exceptions to Development Standards; Chapter 18.795, Visual Clearance Areas; Chapter 18.745, Landscaping and Screening; Chapter 18.765, Off-street Parking and Loading Requirements; Chapter 18.705, Access, Egress and Circulation; and Chapter 18.780, Signs. Compliance with this standard is discussed, and conditioned as necessary in the following section: APPLICABLE DEVELOPMENT CODE STANDARDS. C. APPLICABLE DEVELOPMENT CODE STANDARDS Variances and Adjustments (18.370) Variance to the access width: The Director may approve, approve with conditions, or deny a request for an adjustment from the access requirements contained in Chapter 18.705, based on the following criteria: It is not possible to share access; The applicant has requested Variance approval to allow the construction of 5 additional parking spaces to take access off of an existing 30-foot-wide driveway that serves over 100 vehicles. The Code requires that when more than 99 parking spaces are provided, two, 30-foot-wide access drives or one, 50-foot-wide access drive must be provided. When the adjacent office complex (Hall Corporate Center) was constructed, a Variance was approved to the access width. Parking spaces were constructed on the subject site and a joint parking agreement signed to share parking between this site and the Hall Corporate Center with that previous approval. At that time, the property to the north was owned by a separate individual. The property to the north of the access drive is now owned by owners of the Hall Corporate Center. The applicant has indicated that it is not possible to share an access because the property owner to the north has not agreed to allow additional land to b� dedicated for the additional access width. Staff does not agree with this because the Fiall Corporate Center has recently submitted an application to construct a parking lot on the property to the north of the access drive. While their proposal does not involve increasing the access width, staff has informed them that a variance will not be approved and additional SWAMI VISWA PREMANANDA TEMPLE ADOITION PAGE 10 OF 23 CUP1999-00001/PDR1999-00002NAR1999-00024/MIS1999-00026 12/6/99 STAFF REPORT TO THE PLANNING COMMISSION - parking spaces will not b� �ermitted unless the required wio... is provided. Because the property to the north will be required to provide the additional access width in order to develop their parking lot, staff can not state that this request does not need to comply with the same standards. There are no other alternative access points on the street in question or from another street; Because all the surrounding property is developed, there are no alternative access points to the site. The access separation requirements cannot be met; This standard does not apply because the requested variance does not involve access separation. The request is the minimum adjustment required to provide adequate access; The applicant has access to parking via existing spaces on-site and the shared parking with the Hall Corporate Center. The existing parking is sufficient to serve the proposed use, therefore, adding 5 additional parking spaces is not necessary. _ The approved access or access approved with conditions will result in a safe access; and Staff does not feel that allowing additional parking spaces to be added to an access drive that is already narrower than the Code allows is safe. Part of the reasoning for multiple or wider access drives is to provide access for emergency vehicles. Because the applicant is only proposing 5 additional parking spaces, and with the shared parking there is already sufficient parking to serve the proposed use, staff does not feel that it is necessary to make a bad situation any worse. The visual clearance requirements of Chapter 18.795 will be met. The visual clearance standards will continue to be met. FINDING: Based on the analysis above, staff finds that the variance criteria have not been met. In order to find that the proposal can be approved without the variance, the applicant must submit a revised plan that shows the 5 proposed parking spaces deleted from the site plan OR the access drive must be widened to provide, at minimum, a 40-foot pavement width. CONDITION:Submit a revised plan that shows the 5 proposed parking spaces deleted from the site plan OR the access drive must be widened to provide, at minimum, a 40-foot pavement width. Adjustment to the Front Yard Setback: Up to a 25% reduction of the dimensional standards for the front yard setback required in the base zone may be approved by means of a Type I procedure, as governed by Section 18.390.030, using approval criteria contained in Subsection B2 below: A demonstration that the adjustment requested is the least required to achieve the desired affect; The adjustment will result in the preservation of trees, if trees are present in the development area; The adjustment will not impede adequate emergency access to the site; There is not a reasonable alternative to the adjustment which achieves the desired affect. SWAMI VISWA PREMANANDA TEMPLE ADDITION PAGE 11 OF 23 CUP1999-00001/PDR1999-00002NAR1999-00024/MIS1999-00026 12/6/99 STAFF REPORT TO THE PLANNING COMMISSION The applicant has reque5�ed an Adjustment to the front yard setback required for a � Conditional Use. The Conditional Use standards require a 25-foot setback for Religious Institutions, whereas, the applicant has requested the setback be 20 feet. The front yard setback is adjacent to the existing daycare which is zoned C-P as well. It makes sense to allow this adjustment given that the setback will not be detrimental to another persons privacy or property rights. The reduced setback will not impede adequate emergency access to the site. Staff feels that, given that this is being reviewed as part o# a Planned Development which allows flexibility, and that the adjacent property is zoned and developed commercial, that this Adjustment is reasonable and should be approved. FINDING: Based on the analysis above, staff finds that the front yard setback adjustment is acceptable. Access, Eqress and Circulation: Walkways: On-site pedestrian walkways shall comply with the following standards: Walkways shall extend from the ground floor entrances or from the ground floor landing of stairs, ramps, or elevators of all commercial, institutional, and industrial uses, to the streets which provide the required access and egress. Walkways shall provide convenient connections between buildings in multi-building commercial, institutional, and industrial complexes. Unless impractical, walkways shall be �onstructed between new and existing developments and neighboring developments; There is an existing walkway along the access drive and there is a walkway proposed from the parking lots to the proposed structures. There is not, however, a clearly marked connection between the 2 walkways across the parking lot. A condition is necessary to insure that this is provided. Wherever required walkways cross vehicle access driveways or parking lots, such crossings shall be designed and located for pedestrian safety. Required walkways shall be physically separated from motor vehicle traffic and parking by either a minimum 6-inch vertical separation (curbed) or a minimum 3-foot horizontal separation, except that pedestrian crossings of traffic aisles are permitted for distances no greater than 36 feet if appropriate landscaping, pavement markings, or contrasting pavement materials are used. Walkways shall be a minimum of four feet in width, exclusive of vehicle overhangs and obstructions such as mailboxes, benches, bicycle racks, and sign posts, and shall be in compliance with ADA standards; and The applicant, as conditioned above, will be required to provide a clearly marked walkway across the parking lot to connect the existing and proposed walkway. By complying with this condition, this standard will be satisfied. Required walkways shall be paved with hard surfaced materials such as concrete, asphalt, stone, brick, etc. Walkways may be required to be lighted and/or signed as needed for safety purposes. Soft-surfaced public use pathways may be provided only � if such pathways are provided in addition to required pathways. The plans indicate that the proposed walkway will be concrete. Minimum Access Requirements for Commercial and Industrial Use: Section 18.705.030.1 provides the minimum access requirements for commercial and industrial uses: Table 18.705.3 indicates that the required access width for developments with more than 100 parking spaces is one 50-foot-wide access with a 40-foot pavement width or two 30-foot-wide access points with 24 feet of pavement. Vehicular access shall be provided to commercial or industrial uses, and s�all be located to within 50 feet of the primary ground floor entrances; addi#iona� requirements for truck traffic may be placed as conditions of site development review. SWAMI VISWA PREMANANDA TEMPLE ADDITION PAGE 12 OF 23 CUP1999-00001/PDR1999-00002NAR1999-00024/MIS1999-00026 12/6/99 STAFF REPORT TO THE PLANNING COMMISSION � � The access is only 30 feet a�id serves over 100 cars. This was a�.�roved by a Variance as part of a previous application. The applicant has requested a Variance to allow more parking off of this driveway. As discussed, staff has recommended against this request. Director's Authority to Restrict Access: Section 18.705.030.K states that in order to eliminate the need to use public streets for movements between commercial and industrial properties, parking areas shall be designed to connect with parking areas on adjacent properties unless not feasible. The Director shall require access easements between properties where necessary to provide for parking area connections. The site already has shared parking and access, therefore, this standard is satisfied. FINDING: Based on the analysis above, staff finds that the access and egress standards are not satisfied, however, if the applicant complies with the condition below, this standard will be met. CONDITION: Submit a revised plan that shows a clearly marked walkway across the access drive/parking lot connecting the existing sidewalk and the proposed sidewalk. Landscapinq and Screeninq — Chapter 18.745: - Street trees: Section 18.745.040 states that all development projects fronting on a public street shall be required to plant street trees in accordance with Section 18.745.040.0 Section 18.745.040.0 required that street trees be spaced between 20 and 40 feet apart depending on the size classification of the tree at maturity (small, medium or large). The property has no street frontage other than the access drive, therefore, this standard can not be applied. Land Use Buffering and Screening: Section 18.745.080 requires that at a minimum the buffer between a proposed Commercial use and residential use must contain a 10-20 foot buffer with trees, lawn/groundcover, shrubs, and screening. The property to the west is zoned and developed with existing single-family residential homes. The applicant must, therefore, provide for a buffer based on the matrix in Table 18.745.2. The applicanYs plans show the building will be set back 55 feet from the western property line and landscaping is provided with a laurel hedge, cedar trees and lawn, which provides the most stringent screening option (Level F). . Screening - Special Provisions: Section 18.745.050.E requires the screening of parking and loading areas. Landscaped parking areas shall include special design features which effectively screen the parking lot areas from view. Planting materials to be installed should achieve a relative balance between low lying and vertical shrubbery and trees. Trees shall be planted in landscaped islands in all parking areas, and shall be equally distributed on the basis of one (1) tree for each seven (7) parking spaces in order to provide a canopy effect. The minimum dimension on the landscape islands shall be three (3) feet wide and the landscaping shall be protected from vehicular damage by some form of wheel guard or curb. The majority of the parking is existing. The applicant has proposed 5 additional parking spaces which, if the access drive is widened and the spaces are permitted, will have the required screening. FINDING: Based on the analysis above, the landscaping and screening standards have been fully met. SWAMI VISWA PREMANANDA TEMPLE ADDITION PAGE 13 OF 23 CUP1999-00001/PDR1999-00002NAR1999-00024/MIS1999-00026 1?J6/99 STAFF REPORT TO THE PLANNING COMMISSION Off-Street Parkinq and Loa�inq (18.765): � Disabled-Accessible Parking: All parking areas shall be provided with the required number of parking spaces for disabled persons as specified by the State of Oregon Uniform Building Code and federal standards. Such parking spaces shall be sized, signed and marked as required by these regulations. The majority of parking is existing and the proposed parking spaces, which were intended to be ADA accessible, are not approved unless the access drive is widened. The applicant must, however, provide for ADA accessible spaces to the new structures. The amount of spaces required is based on the number of spaces on this site alone (22 spaces), therefore, one (1) additional ADA space is needed. Access Drives: With regard to access to public streets from off-street parking: access drives from the street to off-street parking or loading areas shall be designed and constructed to facilitate the flow of traffic and provide maximum safety for pedestrian and vehicular traffic on the site; the number and size of access drives shall be in accordance with the requirements of Chapter, 18.705, Access, Egress and Circulation; access drives shall be clearly and permanently marked and defined through use of rails, fences, walls or other barriers or markers on frontage not occupied by service drives; access drives shall have a minimum vision clearance in accordance with Chapter 18.795, Visual Clearance; access drives shall be improved with an asphalt or concrete surface; and excluding single-family and duplex residences, except as provided by Subsection 18.810.030.P, groups of two or more parking spaces shall be served by a service drive so that no backing movements or other maneuvering within a street or other public right-of-way will be required. The access drive to the site is existing. As discussed previously, the dimensions are non- conforming based on the number of parking spaces. Provided they do not increase the parking spaces already approved, the driveway dimension is acceptable as it has been approved by a previous Variance. Parking Lot Striping: Except for single-family and duplex residences, any area intended to be used to meet the off-street parking requirements as contained in this Chapter shall have all parking spaces clearly marked; and all interior drives and access aisles shall be clearly marked and signed to show direction of flow and maintain vehicular and pedestrian safety. The parking lot is existing and parking spaces are clearly marked, therefore, this standard is satisfied. Wheel Stops: Parking spaces along the boundaries of a parking lot or adjacent to interior landscaped areas or sidewalks shall be provided with a wheel stop at least four inches high located three feet back from the front of the parking stall. The front three feet of the parking stall may be concrete, asphalt or low lying landscape material that does not exceed the height of the wheel stop. This area cannot be calculated to meet landscaping or sidewalk requirements. The existing parking area has curbs along the perimeter. There is bark dust adjacent to the parking area that meets the low lying landscape requirement, therefore, this standard is satisfied. SWAMI VISWA PREMANANDA TEMPLE ADDITION PAGE 14 OF 23 CUP1999-00001/PDR1999-00002NAR1999-00024/MIS1999-00026 12/6✓99 STAFF REPORT TO THE PLANNING COMMISSION . Space and Aisle Dimens,.,ns: Section 18.765.040.N states that: "except as modified for angled parking in Figures 18.765.1 and 18.765.2 the minimum dimensions for parking spaces are: 8.5' x 18.5' for a standard space and 7.5' x 16.5' for a compact space; aisles accommodating two direction traffic, or allowing access from both ends, shall be 24 feet in width. The parking spaces are existing, therefore, this standard does not apply. Bicycle Parking Location and Access: Section 18.765.050 states bicycle parking areas shall be provided at locations within 50 feet of primary entrances to structures; bicycle parking areas shall not be located within parking aisles, landscape areas or pedestrian ways; outdoor bicycle parking shall be visible from on-site buildings and/or the street. When the bicycle parking area is not visible from the street, directional signs shall be used to located the parking area; and bicycle parking may be located inside a building on a floor which has an outdoor entrance open for use and floor location which does not require the bicyclist to use stairs to gain access to the space. Exceptions may be made to the latter requirement for parking on upper stories within a multi-story residential building. The proposed bicycle rack is within 50 feet of the entrance Ashram and is not located in parking aisles, landscape areas or pedestrian ways. _ Bicycle Parking Design Requirements: Section 18.765.050.C. The following design requirements apply to the installation of bicycle racks: The racks required for required bicycle parking spaces shall ensure that bicycles may be securely locked to them without undue inconvenience. Provision of bicycle lockers for long-term (employee) parking is encouraged but not required; bicycle racks must be securely anchored to the ground, wall or other structure; bicycle parking spaces shall be at least 21h feet by six feet long, and, when covered, with a vertical clearance of seven feet. An access aisle of at least five feet wide shall be provided and maintained beside or between each row of bicycle parking; each required bicycle parking space must be accessible without moving another bicycle; required bicycle parking spaces may not be rented or leased except where required motor vehicle parking is rented or leased. At-cost or deposit fees for bicycle parking are exempt from this requirement; and areas set aside for required bicycle parking must be clearly reserved for bicycle parking only. Outdoor bicycle parking facilities shall be surfaced with a hard surfaced material, i.e., pavers, asphalt, concrete or similar material. This surface must be designed to remain well drained. The applicant has not provided detail of the bicycle parking rack, therefore, staff can not determine if this standard has been met. If the applicant submits a detail of the bicycle rack, staff will be able to review it to insure that the design complies with the standards of the Code. Minimum Bicycle Parking Requirements: The total number of required bicycle parking spaces for each use is specified in Table 18.768.2 in Section 18.765.070.H. In no case shall there be less than two bicycle parking spaces. Table 18.768.2 states that for Religious Institutions, one (1) bicycle parking space is required for every 20 seats in the main assembly area. The applicant has indicated that there will be up to 178 chairs in the main assembly, therefore, nine (9) bicycle parking spaces are required. The applicant has indicated that six (6) bicycle parking spaces will be provided. The applicant must revise the plan to provide three (3) additional bicycle parking spaces. Minimum Off-Street Parking: Section 18.765.070.H states that the minimum and maximum parking shall be as required in Table 18.765.2. SWAMI VISWA PREMANANDA TEMPLE ADDITION PAGE 15 OF 23 CUP1999-00001/PDR1999-00002NAR1999-00024/MIS1999-00026 12/6/99 STAFF REPORT TO THE PLANNING COMMISSION Table 18.765.2 states that l�.a minimum parking for a Religious I�,�citution is one (1) space for � every two (2) seats. Because up to 178 seats will be provided in the main assembly area, 89 parking spaces are required. There are 22 parking spaces in this site and 74 on the adjacent site with which the applicant has a shared parking agreement. Because the total number of spaces available is 96 and the uses are compatible in that the peak hours do not overlap, this standard has been satisfied. In addition, a condition recommended as part of the Conditional Use approval will insure that no worship services are scheduled during the "normal" office hours. FINDING: Based on the analysis above, the off-street parking and loading standards have been met. , CONDITIONS: • Submit a revised plan that shows one (1) van accessible handicap space will be provided that includes a 9-foot-wide space with an 8-foot-wide aisle in front of the proposed development. . Submit a detail of the bicycle rack. . Submit a revised plan that shows three (3) additional bicycle parking spaces will be provided. Tree Removal — Chapter 18.790 Section 18.790.030 requires that a tree plan for the planting, removal and protection of trees prepared by a certified arborist be provided for a conditional use application. The tree plan shall include identification of all existing trees, Identification of a program to save existing trees or mitigate tree removal over 12 inches in caliper, identification of which trees are proposed to be removed, and a protection program defining standards and methods that will be used by the applicant to protect trees during and after construction. The applicant's plans do not show any trees will be removed, therefore, this standard does not apply. FINDING: Because the applicant has not proposed to remove and trees, this standard has been met. Visual Clearance Areas — Chapter 18.795: Section 18.795.020.A. states that the provisions of this chapter shall apply to all development including the construction of new structures, the remodeling of existing structures and to a change of use which increases the on-site parking or loading requirements or which changes the access requirements. Section 18.795.030.B. states that a clear vision area shall contain no vehicle, hedge, planting, fence, wall structure or temporary or permanent obstruction (except for an occasional utility pole or tree), exceeding three feet in height, measured from the top of the curb, or where no curb exists, from the street center line grade, except that trees exceeding this height may be located in this area, provided all branches below eight feet are removed. There are no proposed structures inside of the vision clearance area, therefore, this standard is satisfied. FINDING: Based on the analysis above, the standards of Chapter 18.795, Visual Clearance Areas have been met. SWAMI VISWA PREMANANDA TEMPLE ADOITION PAGE 16 OF 23 CUP1999-00001/PDR1999-00002NAR1999-00024/MIS1999-00026 12/6/99 STAFF REPORT TO THE PLANNING COMMISSION . Street And Utilit Im ro�, .�ents Standards - Cha ter 18.81� hapter 18.810 provides construction standards for the implementation of public and private facilities and utilities such as streets, sewers, and drainage. The applicable standards are addressed below: Streets: Improvements: Section 18.810.030.A.1 states that streets within a development and streets adjacent shall be improved in accordance with the Tigard Development Code (TDC) standards. Section 18.810.030.A.2 states that any new street or additional street width planned as a portion of an existing street shall be dedicated and improved in accordance with the TDC. Minimum Rights-of-Way and Street Widths: Section 18.810.030(E) requires an arterial street to have a 60 to 90 right-of-way width and 12-foot lanes. Other improvements required may include on-street parking, sidewalks and bikeways, underground utilities, street fighting, storm drainage, and street trees. This site lies adjacent to SW Hall Boulevard, which is classified as an arterial on the City of Tigard Transportation Plan Map, and is under the jurisdiction of the Oregon Department of Transportation (ODOT). At present, there is approximately 60 feet of ROW accordin to the most recent tax assessor's map. This roadway will eventually be widened to have � lanes with bike lanes. This type of roadway will require the full 90-foot ROW. Therefore, the applicant should dedicate additional ROW along this frontage to provide 45 feet from the centerline. SW Hall Boulevard is currently improved with a centerline-to-curb dimension of approximately 25 feet. This is an interim width approved by ODOT. There is an existing driveway apron that serves the site and other ad�acent uses (Kindercare and Hall Park Office). ODOT submitted comments, dated November 1, 1999, to the City with regard to this project. ODOT is concerned about the current width of the shared access into this site. Of particular concern is the potential for vehicles intending to enter the Kindercare site backing up into Hall Boulevard due to queuing of exiting cars bTocking the Kindercare access. 060T believes the access should be widened to provide for three lanes to help alleviate this potential problem. In addition, ODOT recommends the City require the applicant to schedule their peak traffic into this site such that there is no conflict with the peak traffic periods generated by the Kindercare and Hall Park Office sites. These two issues will be covered in more detail in the Planning Department section of this report, under Section 18.705, Access, Egress, and Circulation. Sidewalks: Section 18.810.070.A requires that sidewalks be constructed to meet City design standards and be located on both sides of arterial, collector and local residential streets. There is an existing sidewalk along the frontage of SW Hall Boulevard adjacent to this site. No further sidewalk improvements are necessary. Sanitary Sewers: Sewers Required: Section 18.810.090.A requires that sanitary sewer be installed to serve each new development and to connect developments to existing mains in accordance with the provisions set forth in Design and Construction Standards for Sanitary and Surface Water Management (as adopted by the Unified Sewerage A�ency in 1996 and including any future revisions or amendments) and the adopted policies of the comprehensive plan. Over-Sizing: Section 18.810.090.0 states that proposed sewer systems shall include consideration of additional development within the area as projected by the Comprehensive Plan. SWAMI VISWA PREMANANDA TEMPLE ADDITION PAGE 17 OF 23 CUP1999-00001/PDR1999-00002NAR1999-00024/MIS1999-00026 12/6/99 STAFF REPORT TO THE PLANNING COMMISSION Sanitary sewer service for �nis site has been provided as a part of the Hall Park Office - development. A 3-inch pressure line was installed within the shared driveway aisle and ties into the existing public sewer line in SW Hall Boulevard. The pressure sewer line is necessary due to the fact that this site is at a lower elevation that what the public line in Hall Boulevard can serve. The new building on this site must be constructed to have a sewer pump system. No further public sewer improvements are necessary. Storm Drainage: General Provisions: Section 18.810.100.A states requires developers to make adequate provisions for storm water and flood water runoff. Accommodation of Upstream Drainage: Section 18.810.100.0 states that a culvert or other drainage facility shall be large enough to accommodate potential runoff from its entire upstream drainage area, whether inside or outside the development. The City Engineer shall approve the necessary size of the facility, based on the provisions of Design and Construction Standards for Sanitary and Surface Water Management (as adopted by the Unified Sewerage Agency in 1996 and including any future revisions or amendments). The Hall Park Office development lies uphill of this site. The majority of the storm water from that development was directed to the north toward the Highway 217 ROW. The drainage plan for this site should be able to accommodate any sheet flow that reaches this site from the wooded area north of the proposed building. Effect on Downstream Drainage: Section 18.810.100.D states that where it is anticipated by the City Engineer that the additional runoff resulting from the development will overload an existing drainage facility, the Director and Engineer shall withhold approval of the development until provisions have been made for improvement of the potential condition or until provisions have been made for storage of additional runoff caused by the development in accordance with the Design and Construction Standards for Sanitary and Surface Water Management (as adopted by the Unified Sewerage agency in 1996 and including any future revisions or amendments). In 1997, the Unified Sewerage Agency (USA) completed a basin study of Fanno Creek and adopted the Fanno Creek Watershed Management Plan. Section V of that plan includes a recommendation that local governments institute a stormwater detention/effective impervious area reduction program resulting in no net increase in storm peak flows up to the 25-year event. The City will require that all new developments resulting in an increase of impervious surfaces provide onsite detention facilities, unless the development is located adjacent to Fanno Creek. For those developments adjacent to Fanno Creek, the storm water runoff will be permitted to discharge without detention. The applicanYs plan indicates that there will be a vegetated swale constructed adjacent to the southern boundary of the site. It is not clear whether the applicant intends for this facility to serve as a detention facility combined with surface water treatment. The applicant may need to adjust their storm drainage plan to accommodate the detention requirement. The plan also indicates that the storm water from this site will be directed to an existing storm drainage line that is located on the adjacent parcels to the east of this site. This existing private storm drainage line is located within an easement granted in favor of this site, as well as the Hall Park Office and Kindercare sites. This fact was discovered as a part of the approval for the Hall Park Office development. No public storm drainage work is necessary to support this development. SWAMI VISWA PREMANANDA TEMPLE AODITION PAGE 18 OF 23 CUP1999-00001/PDR1999-00002NAR1999-00024/MIS1999-00026 12/6/99 STAFF REPORT TO THE PLANNING COMMISSION • Utilities: Section 18.810.120 states that all utility lines, but not limited to those required for electric, communication, lighting and cable television services and related facilities shall be placed underground, except for surface mounted transformers, surface mounted connection boxes and meter cabinets which may be placed above ground, temporary utility service facilities during construction, high capacity electric lines operating at 50,000 volts or above, and: • The developer shall make all necessary arrangements with the serving utility to provide the underground services; • The City reserves the right to approve location of all surface mounted facilities; • All underground utilities, including sanitary sewers and storm drains installed in streets by the developer, shall be constructed prior to the surfacing of the streets; and • Stubs for service connections shall be long enough to avoid disturbing the street improvements when service connections are made. Exception to Under-Grounding Requirement: Section 18.810.120.0 states that a developer shall pay a fee in-lieu of under-grounding costs when the development is proposed to take place on a street where existing utilities which are not underground will serve the development and the approval authority determines that the cost and technical difficulty of under-grounding the utilities outweighs the benefit of under- grounding in conjunction with the development. The determination shall be on a case- by-case basis. The most common, but not the only, such situation is a short frontage development for which under-grounding would result in the placement of additional poles, rather than the removal of above-ground utilities facilities. An applicant for a development which is served by utilities which are not underground and which are located across a public right-of-way from the applicant's property shall pay a fee in- lieu of under-grounding. There are existing overhead utility lines along SW Hall Boulevard. If the fee in-lieu is proposed, it is equal to $27.50 per lineal foot of street frontage that contains the overhead liries. The frontage along this site is 32 lineal feet; therefore, the fee would be $880. ADDITIONAL CITY AND/OR AGENCY CONCERNS REGARDING STREET AND UTILITY IMPROVEMENT STANDARDS: Public Water System: This site lies within the Tualatin Valley Water DistricYs (TVWD) service area. As a part of the Hall Park Office development, domestic and fire water lines were installed to serve both that project and this project. No additional public water line work will be necessary to support this development. Storm Water Quality: The City has agreed to enforce Surface Water Management (SWM) regulations established by the Unified Sewerage Agency (USA) Design and Construction Standards (adopted by Resolution and Order No. 96-44) which require the construction of on-site water quality facilities. The facilities shall be designed to remove 65 percent of the phosphorus contained in 100 percent of the storm water runoff generated from newly created impervious surfaces. In addition, a maintenance plan shall be submitted indicating the frequency and method to be used in keeping the facility maintained through the year. Prior to construction, the applicant shall submit plans and calculations for a water quality facility that will meet the intent of the USA Design Standards. In addition, the applicant shall submit a maintenance plan for the facility that must be reviewed and approved by the City prior to construction. SWAMI VISWA PAEMANANDA TEMPLE ADDITION PAGE 19 OF 23 CUP1999-00001/PDR1999-00002NAR1999-00024/MIS1999-00026 1216/99 STAFF REPORT TO THE PLANNING COMMISSION As was stated above, the applicant is proposing to treat the on5ite storm water runoff in a • vegetated swale. It appears that the site plan has allowed enough room for an adequately sized swale. To ensure compliance with Unified Sewerage Agency design and construction standards, the applicant shall employ the design engineer responsible for the design and specifications of the private water quality facility to perform construction and visual observation of the water quality facility for compliance with the design and specifications. These inspections shall be made at significant stages throughout the project and at completion of the construction. Prior to final building inspection, the design engineer shall provide the City of Tigard (Inspection Supervisor) with written confirmation that the water quality facility is in compliance with the design and specifications. Grading and Erosion Control: USA Design and Construction Standards also regulate erosion control to reduce the amount of sediment and other pollutants reaching the public storm and surface water system resulting from development, construction, grading, excavating, clearing, and any other activity which accelerates erosion. Per USA regulations, the applicant is required to submit an erosion control plan for City review and approval prior to issuance of City permits. Address Assignments: The City of Tigard is responsible for assigning addresses for parcels within the City of Tigard and within the Urban Service Boundary (USB). An addressing fee in the amount of $30 per address shall be assessed. This fee shall be paid to the City prior to issuance of the site and/or building permit. For this project, the addressing fee will be $30 to account for the new building. FINDING: Based on the analysis above, the street utility and improvement standards have not been met outright, however, if the applicant complies with conditions 10 through 15 specified at the front of this report, the standards will be met. D. ADDITIONAL PLANNED DEVELOPMENT CRITERIA Section 18.350.100(B)(3) (a) through (I) provides additional Planned Development Review approval standards not necessarily covered by the provisions of the previously listed sections. These other standards are addressed immediately below with the following exceptions: The following have been discussed previously in this report and will not be discussed in this Section: 18.350.100.B.3.b, 18.350.100.6.3.f, 18.350.100.B.3.g, 18.350.100.B.3.i, 18.350.100.B.3.j, 18.350.100.B.3.k Relationship to the Natural and Physical Environment: The streets, buildings and other site elements shall be designed and located to preserve the existing trees, topography and natural drainage to the greatest degree possible; Structures located on the site shall not be in areas subject to ground slumping and sliding; There shall be adequate distance between on-site buildings and other on-site and off-site buildings on ad�oining properties to provide for adequate light and air circulation and for fire protection; The structures shall be oriented with consideration for the sun and wind directions, where possible; and Trees preserved to the extent possible. Replacement of trees is subject to the requirements of Chapter 18.790, Tree Removal. The buildings have been located on the site to preserve existing trees. There is not significant topography or drainage that will be affected as a result of this proposal. There are no known areas of ground slumping or sliding on site. The proposed setbacks will insure that there is adequate light and air circulation. Fire protection has been considered ai�d the location of these buildings will not hamper fire protection. There are no trees proposed tc be removed. SWAMI VISWA PREMANANDA TEMPLE ADDITION PAGE 20 OF 23 CUP1999-00001/P�R1999-00002NAR1999-00024/MIS1999-00026 12/6/99 STAFF REPORT TO THE PLANNING COMMISSION • � FINDING: Based on ti�� analysis above, staff finds the rt,acionship to the natural and physical environment standards have been met. Privacy and Noise: Non-residential structures which abut existing residential dwellings shall be located on the site or be designed in a manner, to the maximum degree possible, to protect the private areas on the adjoining properties from view and noise; FINDING: The temple will be the closest structure to the single-family dwellings west of the site, however, given the distance from the property line and the fact that it is oriented towards Hall Boulevard, this standard is met. The Ashram is considered a residential structure, therefore, this standard does not apply to that structure. Private Outdoor Area - Multi-Family Use: In addition to the requirements of subparagraph (3), each ground-level residential dwelling unit shall have an outdoor private area (patio, terrace, porch) of not less than 48 square feet; Wherever possible, private outdoor open spaces should be oriented toward the sun; and Private outdoor spaces shall be screened or designed to provide privacy for the use of the space. While the use is not truly multi-family, all but 2 of the rooms have a deck, the other 2 have access to a deck via a shared room. FINDING: Based on the analysis above, this standard has been met. Shared Outdoor Recreation Areas - Multi-Family Use: In addition each multiple-dwelling development shall incorporate shared usable outdoor recreation areas within the development plan as follows: Studio units up to and including two bedroom units, 200 square feet per unit; and Three or more bedroom units, 300 square feet per unit. Shared outdoor recreation space shall be readily observable from adjacent units for reasons of crime prevention and safety; The required recreation space may be provided as follows: It may be all outdoor space; or It may be part outdoor space and part indoor space; for example, an outdoor tennis court and indoor recreation room; or It may be all public or common space; or It may be part common space and part private; for example, it could be an outdoor tennis court, indoor recreation room, and balconies on each unit; or Where balconies are added to units, the balconies shall not be less than 48 square feet. While this is not truly multi-family because each room is not a self-contained unit, there are shared worship areas, yoga classrooms and open space. FINDING: Based on the analysis above, this standard has been met. Public Transit: Provisions for public transit may be required where the site abuts a public transit route. The required facilities shall be based on: (a) The location of other transit facilities in the area; and (b) The size and type of the proposed development. The required facilities shall be limited to such facilities as: (a) A waiting shelter; (b)A turn- out area for Ioading and unloading; and (c) Hard surface paths connecting the development to the waiting area. The access drive fronts SW Hall Boulevard, which is on a transit route, however, because the entire frontage is taken up by the access drive, this standard can not be applied. FINDING: Because the entire frontage on the transit route is taken up by the access drive, there is no place to provide transit facilities and, therefore, this standard can not be applied. SWAMI VISWA PREMANANDA TEMPLE ADDITION PAGE 21 OF 23 CUP1999-00001/PDR1999-00002NAR1999-00024/MIS1999-00026 12/6/99 STAFF REPORT TO THE PLANNING COMMISSION Floodplain Dedication: � � Where landfill and/or development is allowed within or adjacent to the 100-year floodplain, the City shall require consideration of the dedication of sufficient open land area for a greenway adjoining and within the floodplain. This area shall include portions of. a suitable elevation for the construction of a pedestrian/bicycle pathway with the floodplain in accordance with the adopted pedestrian bicycle pathway plan. The proposal is not within or adjacent to the 100-year floodplain, therefore, this standard does not apply. FINDING: Because the site is not within or adjacent to the 100-year floodplain, this standard does not apply. SECTION VIII. OTHER STAFF COMMENTS The City Building Division has reviewed the proposed and offered the following comments: (1) All underlying land division must be consolidated into one legal description, (2) Provide accessible parking for phase #1, (3) Provide accessible route from all required exists of phase 1 to the public way. Marked crossings are required; (4) Will there be 2 site permits or done under 1 for both phases? (5) Occupancy will be based on 200 square feet per person; (6) Phase 1 is a R-1 congregate residence; (7) Provide a auto fire alarm, manual fire alarm and fire sprinklers if occupant load is 20; (8) Provide accessible rooms, 1106.2.2, 1106.1.10.6, table 11-B and 1109.25; (9) Correct scale on site plan 1"=30'; (10) Provide fire truck access to within 150 feet of all exterior walls, a turn-around is required; (11) How many quests to a guest room? (12) An elevator is required for temple; (13) Area of rescue is required in lower temple area; (14) Is the lower level a story or a basement?; (15) Type of construction V-1 HR; (16) Is the dining hall a multi-use room?; (17) Ramp to lower level slope? (18) Too much to comment on. The City Police Department has had the opportunity to review the proposal and has requested that a lighting plan be submitted for review and approval. The City of Tigard Utility Manager has had the opportunity to review the proposal and indicated that all sanitary and storm sewer are to be private. The City of Tigard Property Management/Operations Department has had the opportunity to review the proposal and has offered no comments or objections. SECTION IV. AGENCY COMMENTS The Oregon Department of Transportation has reviewed the proposal and offered the following comments: The proposed development's sole access is to Hall Blvd. According to the Oreqon Hiqhwav Plan, Hall Blvd. Is a State facility with a District highway classification. We have an interest in ensuring that proposed land uses do not negatively impact the safe and efficient use of this facility. We are concerned with the ability of the two lane highway access to safely accommodate the continued increase in traffic. Particularly, we are concerned that vehicles intending to enter the Kindercare site may not be able to directly turn in due to queuing which blocks the access. This could potentially cause vehicles to back up on the highway creating a potential safety problem. When the adjacent property to the north of the access road develops, th� access should be widened to accommodate a three lane section. This improvement would alleviate ODOT's concerns. SWAMI VISWA PREMANANDA TEMPLE ADDITION PAGE 22 OF 23 CUP1999-00001/PDR1999-00002NAR1999-00024/MIS1999-00026 12/6/99 STAFF REPORT TO THE PLANNING COMMISSION • • � We recommend the Cit, .;ondition the Temple Expansior� _�ch that their peak traffic generation ties do not coincide with the peak traffic generation times of the Office development to the north or the Kindercare development to the southeast of the site. This condition would allow the Temple to expand without adding traffic pressure to the highway access. We encourage the applicant to work with the property to the north of the access road as they prepare development plans to ensure that the access is widened to accommodate the needs of all the property owners who share the highway access. Staff response: These comments have been discussed under the Street, Utility and Improvement Standards section and Variance discussion of this report. Unified Sewerage Agency has reviewed the proposal and offered comments which have been incorporated into the body of this report. Portland General Electric, NW Natural Gas, TCI Cable, General Telephone, Tri-Met, US West, and Tualatin Valley Water District were given the opportunity to review this proposal and submitted no comments or objections. November 22, 1999 PREPAR BY: ulia Hadjuk DATE Associate Planner ,_ --- i"� ,, - � � E - �`� �� `� November 22, 1999 APPROVED BY: Richard Bewersdorff , DATE Planning Manager i:\curpl n�j ul ia\cup99-01.doc SWAMI VISWA PREMANANDA TEMPLE ADDITION PAGE 23 OF 23 CUP1999-00001/PDR1999-00002NAR1999-00024/MIS1999-00026 12/6/99 STAFF REPORT TO THE PLANNING COMMISSION � � �' '� 1 _�- ! • ,., � 1,\ � TING OFFI BUII G \ \� � � \ �./ � / � . �! 1� � �,� � � . cf � Z �� O � "y — , , . . '/� 228.�B• v! _ .�� . � _r� u � � i r�i --•/�� O �y� � �' � P`!� � J,� rr � \�� ti �n i \ �� ` �1� �O' 'Ly C f.� ' � �� / 1 i r ��_ 16"� \� � - � � � Z � � �� y �� r� ` � ' ,�,�,,,. �' J . � ��` a / 40, snh:Cn�RE DEGDU(r1S Q 1 �/ TRFES TO BE o'CYPftESS)� ` � LL. � � a c� p$Ep lEA1PLE '"�" 226.0 (BASEM EIEV 217.0) � PHA � �s O d 6 ti � � � SS' y ca ...wr.rss..�. r a.. � � • ' U y $ l �} O 1ti C17SiM� 7 PRO 22� N�O . SP S BIKE RAq((6 SPACESI a.o.rre � PI//�SE 1 cwsr�+c srnucnxrc 219t M� PROPOSED ASN + fF 219t (�ATCH EYI NG PFIASE I I O O �� SITE PLAN I CUP 1999-0000 I/PDR 1999-00002 EXH(BIT MAP � VAR1999=00024/MIS1999=00026 — ma is�ot to sca�e SWAMI YISWA TEMPLE EXPANSION pp � . � TGEOGRAPHICINiORMSTiON SYSTEM - VICINITY MAP y� --- - - � . Y 2'� CUP I 999-0000 I - - PDR I 999-00002 �! VAR I 999-00024 T MIS I 999-OOOZ6 ' . �, ___ ; � � SWAMI VISWA , °' ° TEMPLE EXPANSION � - z sus�ECT TAX LOTS FFLE � I w > - Q w � > � Q - - � o I �- � rn � LOMITA N = o iao zoo soo aoo vea� � r 7'=3C3 feet r �z ' �� , > w � 2�� City of Tigard Q Q � � �L Intofm�UOn oa�hrs map is lor peneral location ony aM O �A �hould W wrilsd with th�p�v�bprtrnt Suviu�Division. ., � �� 13125 SW Hall Blvtl � Tipard,OR 97223 I . (503)679-1171 I (� htlp:l/wNa.ci.tipard.or.us Community Development Plot date:Sep 21, 1999;C:lmagicWIAGIC03.APR , REQUEST FOR COMMENTS CITY OF TIGARD �'animunity!�.eveCopment RECE�V��tter Com�nunity DATE: September 22,1999 T0: Brian Moore,P6E Service Desi9n Consultant SEP 2 7 1999 FROM: City of Tigard Plannin9 Division CITY OF TIGARD STAFF CONTACT: lulia Powell Haiduk,Associate Planner Phone: [5031639-4111/Fax: [503]684-1291 CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT[CUPI 1999-00001,PLANNED DEVELOPMENT REVIEW[PDRI 1999-00002 VARIANCE[VARI 1999-00024 antl SETBACK ADIUSTMENT[MISI 1999-00026 y �I�iAiNi VI��ViW�'E�iPLE EK�ANSI0�1 �: The applicant has requested Conditional Use Approval to expand the existing Ashram (temple). The applicant is also requesting Planned Development approval to allow the residential use of two bedrooms for the residents and eight guestrooms. A variance has been requested to the access width. An adjustment to the front yard setback for a religious facility has also been requested. LOCATION: The site is located at 11515 SW Hall Blvd. The properties are also identified as WCTM 1 S135DA Tax Lot 1400 and 3503. ZONES: C-P; Professional Commercial. APPLICABLE REVIEW CRITERIA: Community Development Code Chapters 18.330, 18.370, 18.390, 18.510, 18.530, 18.705, 18.745, 18.765, 18.775, 18.790, 18.795 and 18.810 Attached are the Site Plan, Vicinity Map and Applicant's Statement for your review. From information supplied by various departments and agencies and from other information available to our staff, a report and recommendation will be prepared and a decision will be rendered on the proposal in the near future. If you wish to comment on this application, WE NEED YOUR COMMENTS BACK BY: WEDNESDAY—OCTOBER 6, 1999. You may use the space provided below or attach a separate letter to return your comments. If vou are unable to respond by the above date, please phone the staff contact noted above with your comments and confirm your comments in writing as soon as possible. If you have any questions, contact the Tigard Planning Division, 13125 SW Hall Boulevard, Tigard, OR 97223. PLEASE CHECK THE fOLLOWING ITEMS THAT APPLY: � We have reviewed the proposal and have no objections to it. Please contact of our office. Please refer to the enclosed letter. _ Written comments provided below: (rrlease provid'e t�ie foCfawing information� ame of erson[sl ommenting: `��,Q��,� Phone Number[sl: �"�o �� CUP 1999-00001//SWAMI VISWA TEMPLE EXPANSION PROPOSAL REQUEST FOR COMMENTS r REQUEST FOR COMMENTS CITY OF TIGARD " Community�T�eveCopment S(apingA BetterCommunity DATE: September 22,1999 T0: lulia Huffman,USA/SWM Pro9ram � � � � j� � � FROM: City of Tigard Planning Division SEP 2 `` +g��:' STAFF CONTACT: lulia Powell HaiduK,Associate Planner B Phone: [5031639-4171/Fax: [5031684-7297 y --..._.. _--_ CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT[CUPI 1999-00001,PLANNED DEVELOPMENT REVIEW[PDRI 1999-00002 VARIANCE[VARI 1999-00024 and SETBACK ADIUSTMENT[MISI 1999-00026 ➢ SWAMI VISWA TEMPLE EI(PANSION Q The applicant has requested Conditional Use Approval to expand the existing Ashram (temple). The applicant is also requesting Planned Development approval to allow the residential use of two bedrooms for the residents and eight guestrooms. A variance has been requested to the access width. An adjustment to the front yard setback for a religious facility has also been requested. LOCATION: The site is Iocated at 11515 SW Hall Blvd. The properties are also identified as WCTM 1 S135DA Tax Lot 1400 and 3503. ZONES: C-P; Professional Commercial. APPLICABLE REVIEW CRITERIA: Community Development Code Chapters 18.330, 18.370, 18.390, 18.510, 18.530, 18.705, 18.745, 18.765, 18.775, 18.790, 18.795 and 18.810 Attached are the Site Plan, Vicinity Map and Applicant's Statement for your review. From information supplied by various departments and agencies and from other information available to our staff, a report and recommendation will be prepared and a decision will be rendered on the proposal in the near future. If you wish to comment on this application, WE NEED YOUR COMMENTS BACK BY: WEDNESDAY—OCTOBER 6, 1999. You may use the space provided below or attach a separate letter to return your comments. If you are unable to respond by the above date, please phone the staff contact noted above with your comments and confirm your comments in writing as soon as possible. If you have any questions, contact the Tigard Planning Division, 13125 SW Hall Boulevard, Tigard, OR 97223. PLEASE CHECK THE FOLLOWING ITEMS THAT APPLY: _ We have reviewed the proposal and have no objections to it. Please contact of our office. � Please refer to the enclosed letter. _ Written comments provided below: (��e prov;de che foQo-wi�rg tnforntacion�Name o CI'SOII S ommentin • la � Phone Number[sl: ;�� - ��e CUP 1999-00001//SWAMI VISWA TEMPLE EXPANSION PROPOSAL REQUEST FOR COMMENTS UNIFIED SEWERAGE AGENCY OF WASHINGTON COUNTY MEMORANDUM DATE: October 4, 1999 TO: Julia Hajduk, City of Tigard FROM: Julia Huffman, USA �,� JL' SUBJECT: Swami Viswa Temple Expansion, CUP 1999-00001, PDR 1999-00002, VAR 1999-00024, MIS 1999-00026 SANITARY SEWER The development should be provided with a means of disposal for sanitary sewer. The means of disposal should be in accordance with R&O 96-44 (Unified Sewerage Agency's Construction Design Standards, July 1996 edition). Engineer should verify that public sanitary sewer is available to uphill adjacent properties, or extend service as required by R&O 96-44. STORM SEWER The development should have access to public storm sewer. Engineer should verify that public storm sewer is available to uphill adjacent properties, or extend storm service as required by R&O 96-44. Hydraulic and hydrological analysis of storm conveyance system is necessary. If downstream storm conveyance does not have the capacity to convey the volume during a 25- year, 24-hour storm event, the applicant is responsible for mitigating the flow. WATER QUALITY Developer should provide a water quality facility to treat the new impervious surface being constructed as part of this development. 155 North First Avenue, Suite 270, MS 10 Phone: 503/648-8621 Hillsboro, Oregon 97124-3072 FAX:503/640-3525 REQUEST FOR COMMENTS CITY OF TIGARD Community�17e�veCapment S(taping A Better�'ommunity DATE: September 22,1999 T0: lim Wolf,Tigard Police Department Crime Preuentlon Offcer RECEIVED PLANNING FROM: City of Tigard Planning Division SEP 2 91999 STAff CONTACT: lulia Powell Naltluk,Associate Planner �kTY OF TIGARD Phone: [5031639-4111/fax: [5031684-129] CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT[CUP)1999-00001,PLANNED DEVELOPMENT REVIEW[PDRI 1999-00002 VARIANCE[VARI 1999-00024 and SETBACK ADIUSTMENT[MISI 1999-00026 ➢ SWAMI VISWA TEMPLE ExPANSION Q The applicant has requested Conditional Use Approval to expand the existing Ashram (temple). The applicant is also requesting Planned Development approval to allow the residential use of two bedrooms for the residents and eight guestrooms. A variance has been requested to the access width. An adjustment to the front yard setback for a religious facility has also been requested. LOCATION: The site is located at 11515 SW Hall Blvd. The properties are also identified as WCTM 1 S135DA Tax Lot 1400 and 3503. ZONES: C-P; Professional Commercial. APPLICABLE REVIEW CRITERIA: Community Development Code Chapters 18.330, 18.370, 18.390, 18.510, 18.530, 18.705, 18.745, 18.765, 18.775, 18.790, 18.795 and 18.810 Attached are the Site Plan, Vicinity Map and Applicant's Statement for your review. From information supplied by various departments and agencies and from other information available to our staff, a report and recommendation will be prepared and a decision will be rendered on the proposal in the near future. If you wish to comment on this application, WE NEED YOUR COMMENTS BACK BY: WEDNESDAY— OCTOBER 6, 1999. You may use the space provided below or attach a separate letter to return your comments. If vou are unable to resnond by the above date, please phone the staff contact noted above with your comments and confirm your comments in writing as soon as possible. If you have any questions, contact the Tigard Planning Division, 13125 SW Hall Boulevard, Tigard, OR 97223. PLEASE CHECK THE FOLLOWING ITEMS THAT APPLY: _ We have reviewed the proposal and have no objections to it. Please contact of our office. . Please refer to the enclosed letter. � Written comments provided below: Q.,�qvi� " \�� Q�o,r" (2lease provufe tke folzowing inforn�ation�Name of Person[sl ommendng: , �1� Phone Number[sl: � ��0 CUP 1999-00001//SWAMI VISWA TEMPLE EXPANSION PROPOSAL REQUEST FOR COMMENTS REQUEST FOR COMMENTS CITY OF TIGARD Community�Deve[opment S&apingA Better Community DATE: September 22,1999 R�CENED PLANNWG T0: lohn Roy,Property Manager/Operations Department SEP 2 91999 FROM: City of Tigard Planning Division �l�OF 71GARD STAFF CONTACT: lulia Powell Halduk,Associate Planner Phone: [5031639-4171/Fax: [5031684-1297 CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT[CUPI 1999-00001,PLANNED DEVELOPMENT REVIEW[PDRI 1999-00002 YARIANCE[VARI 1999-00024 and SETBACK ADIUSTMENT[MISI 1999-00026 ➢ SWAMI VISWA TEMPLE EI(PANSION Q The applicant has requested Conditional Use Approval to expand the existing Ashram (temple). The applicant is also requesting Planned Development approval to allow the residential use of two bedrooms for the residents and eight guestrooms. A variance has been requested to the access width. An adjustment to the front yard setback for a religious facility has also been requested. LOCATION: The site is located at 11515 SW Hall Blvd. The properties are also identified as WCTM 1S135DA Tax Lot 1400 and 3503. ZONES: C-P; Professional Commercial. APPLICABLE REVIEW CRITERIA: Community Development Code Chapters 18.330, 18.370, 18.390, 18.510, 18.530, 18.705, 18.745, 18.765, 18.775, 18.790, 18.795 and 18.810 Attached are the Site Plan, Vicinity Map and Applicant's Statement for your review. From information supplied by various departments and agencies and from other information available to our staff, a report and recommendation will be prepared and a decision will be rendered on the proposal in the near future. If you wish to comment on this application, WE NEED YOUR COMMENTS BACK BY: WEDNESDAY— OCTOBER 6, 1999. You may use the space provided below or attach a separate letter to return your comments. If vou are unable to respond by the above date, please phone the staff contact noted above with your comments and confirm your comments in writing as soon as possible. If you have any questions, contact the Tigard Planning Division, 13125 SW Hall Boulevard, Tigard, OR 97223. PLEASE CHECK THE FOLLOWING ITEMS THAT APPLY: We have reviewed the proposal and have no objections to it. Please contact of our office. Please refer to the enclosed letter. _ Written comments provided below: �2lease pro-v�e tFie fol�owtng�nfor„�c:on�Name of Person[sl ommendng: Phone Number[sl: CUP 1999-000�1//SWAMI VISWA TEMPLE EXPANSION PROPOSAL REQUEST FOR COMMENTS w Sep-27-99 07 _ 11A TCI c' _ Helens 50? �97 5686 P . 02 REQUEST FOR COMMENTS CITY OF iIGARD � ��rr�ururrily�Uerr(�l•mr�rr ,il�a1jr�tJ.;'1�L3c'tf��r(��rrrnr«�rily �ATE: Se tp ember 22,1999 RECEIVED PLANNING T0: Pat McCann,TCI Ca6leuision FROM: Ci of Tigard Pianning Division SEP 2 9 1999 STAFF COHTACT: lulia Powell Halduk,Associate Planner ��nOF71CiARD Phone: [5031639-41r 1 Fax: [503]684-]29l CONDITIONAt USE PERMIT[CUP11999-OOOOI,PLANNED UEYELOPMENT REVIEW[PDRI 1999-00002 YARIANCE[VAR]1999-00024 and SETBACN ADIUSTMENT[MISI 1999-00026 .- SWAMI YISWA TEMPlE El(PANSfON -: The applicant has requested Conditional Use Approvaf to expand the existing Ashram (temple) The applicant is also reguesting Planned Development approval to allow the residential use of two bedrooms for the residents and eight guestrooms. A variance has been requested to the access width. An adjustment to the front yard setback for a reiigious facility has also been requested. LOCATION: The site is located at 11515 SW Hall Blvd. The properties are also identified as WCTM 1S135DA Tax Lot 1400 and 3503. ZONES: C-P; Professiona{ Commercial. APPLICABLE REVIEW CRITERlA: Community Development Code Chapters 18.330, 18.370, j � 18.390, 18.510, 18.530, 18.705, 18.745, 18.765, 18.775, 18.790, 18.795 and 18.810 - - JI Attached are the Site Plan, Vicinity Map and ApplicanYs Statement for your review. Frflm information supplied by various departments and agencies and from �ther information available td our staff, a report and recommendation will be prepared and a decision will be rendered on the proposal in the near future. If you wish to comment on this application, WE NEED YOUR COMMENTS BACK BY: WEDNESDAY— OCTOBER 6,_1999. You may use the space provided below or attach a separate letter to return your corriments. If vou ar� unable to respond bv the above_date, please phone the staff contact noted above with your comments and confirm your cornments in writing as soon as possible. {f you have any questions, contact the Tigard Planning Division, 13125 SW Hall Boulevard, Tigard, OR 97223. PLEASf CHECK THE fOLLOWING ITEMS THAT APPIY: � We have reviewed the proposal and have no objections to it. Please contact .. _ _ of our office. Please refer to the enclosed letter. _ Written comments provided below: �`�rl�r�:r,.•,,��,��:;��rr��,,rr�,t��,,�,��;,,r,��,�,,,�Name of Person[sl Commenting• �� . �� - - ��i=l% L -� � tirn/ Phone Numher[sl: - � �-- -� , _ ---_ --- CUP 19�+9-00001:rSWAMI VISbVA TEM�i F FxPaNSli�,�1 PunPncai uFn�iFCr Fna r�r i+..�n+�r,�rc Sep-27-99 07 : 11A TCI �' . Helens 503 �97 5686 P _ O1 . T �J � 1 �C 1 FAX COVER SHEET i . � � �.�' �C DATE: � TIME: —�.e ' �t�'1 ,%1 . `. . , . T O: L-��[ �.• c.�- �.-C� � ; �� .-f L � � 7 ' �' ' ' '" ' : , , (, � �. �. �� .'t.�r _ C� � � , __) , FROM . i'. � � � c,y- C � /.) 7� '- /�! �� `� / �'�, ``�Ll. ��LC liL•,�''�,J , i : " f �i. �f r �n: - TC I OF TUALAI'I N VALLEY' 14200 S .W. BRIGr�D00� CT. BFAVERTON , OREGOiV 97045 PHOf�E : ( 503} 605-4895 FA`C : ( 503) 64.6-8004 NUMSER OF PAGES IN THIS � TRAV S,L!I S S I Ov I VCLC.'D I NG TH 1 S COV ER SHEET: tiOTES : TC�of Tualatln+Ialley.Inc. 14200 S.W. BngadoUn Cuurt 6eavertcn,OR 9'U05 (56�y 605-4895 FAX(50�)646-8004 An E�)uel Op�nrlunrry E:nOI%yer ' 03/28/99 TUE 10:09 FAX 503 591 0986 TVWD ENGINEERING �005 _�— � P BEQUEST F�R COMMENTS ClTY Of TIGARD Contmunity�Develapment �A�' Septemher 221999 shaPtnB�{�BetterComrnunit R�C�IVFD PLANNING • T0: Taalatin Ya terDistrictAdministrat�uc O�c�s SEP 2 9 1999 FROM: ' of Ti ard Flannin 'vision CITY OF?'IGARD SIAFF CQNTACt lulia Powel!Ha du sociate P[anner Phone: (503163 111/Fax: [503]684-129T CONDITIONAI USE PERMIT CCUPI 1999-00001,P[ANNEp pEVELppN1ENT REYIEW(ppg)Zggg.ap r VARIANCE[VAR1 i999-00024 e�id SETBACN ADIUSTMENT[MIS]i9�99-00026 ��Z ➢ SWAMI VISWA TEMPLE ERPANSION � � The applicant has requested Conditional Use Approval to expand the existing Ashram (tempfe). The a !rc also requesting Planned Devefopment approval to allow the resident�ar use of two bedrooms for the�residen's and eisht guestrooms. A variance has been requested to the access width. An adjustment to the front a ts setback for a religious facility has also been requested. �OCATtON: The site is lacated at 11515 SW Hall g��rd _ _The properties are also identifred as WCTM 1S135DA Tax Lot 1400 and 3503. ZONES: d� C�me�ctar. HrrLii.s�►o�� R�,,;��, --�--^ - C-P; Professional �..�.�..:.�.---�---_...,:.., .,,......� 18.390, 18.510, 18.530, 18.705, 18.745, 98.765, 18.775, 18.790,,18.795 and 18.810 �n ��tAr�_�R ��n �Q_�� •-r• --. _ .,� Attached are the Site Plan, Vicinity Map and App(icant's Statement for your review. From information su various departments and agencies and from other information available ta our staff, a report and re PPlied b be prepared and a decision wili be rendered on the proposal in the near future. If you wish to com application, �mmendation wi Y C M N B C B : ment on thi; provided below or attach a separate letter to retum your c�meSDA f OCT�B�R 6 �g9g, You may use the spacE please phvne the staff contact noted a b v v e w i t h y o u r c ommen ts and confirm your comments ln writin as so � y th above datP passi bfe, ff you have any questions, contact the Tigard Planning Division, 13125 S W H a l l B o�l e v a r d, T i a r d n a. 97223. g , O� PLEASE CHfCK THE fOLtOWING ITEMS TNATAPpLY: — We have reviewed the proposal and have no objections to it. _ Please contact �. Please refer to the enc(osed letter, of our office, _ Written comments provided below; ��Please provi�e tfie follmving information) 81lIC Q PCfSQn[S]C01iI111COvllq: Fdane Number[sl: �� Z CUP 1999-00001//SWqM!VISWA TEMPLE EXPANSIOIV �- PROPOSAL REOIlFCT Fno�.,�...�.,_,. REQUEST FOR C�MMENTS CITY OF TIGARD ('ommunity�1)cceCopmeirt S�apingA Better�'oramunity DATE: September 22,1999 T0: Lori Dorney,US West Communicatlons Engineenng FROM: Cit�l of Tigard Planning Division STAFF CONTACT: lulia Powell Najduk,Associate Planner Phone: [5031639-41T1/Fax: [5031684-1297 CON�ITIONAL USE PERMIT[CUPI 1999-00001,PLANNE�DEVELOPMENT REVIEW[PDRI 1999-00002 YARIANCE[VARI 1999-00024 and SETBACK ADIUSTMENT[MISI 1999-00026 ➢ SWAMI VISWA TEMPLE El(PANSION Q The applicant has requested Conditional Use Approval to expand the existing Ashram (temple). The applicant is also requesting Planned Development approval to allow the residential use of two bedrooms for the residents and eight guestrooms. A variance has been requested to the access width. An adjustment to the front yard setback for a religious facility has also been requested. LOCATION: The site is located at 11515 SW Hall Blvd. The properties are also identified as WCTM 1 S135DA Tax Lot 1400 and 3503. ZONES: C-P; Professional Commercial. APPLICABLE REVIEW CRITERIA: Community Development Code Chapters 18.330, 18.370, 18.390, 18.510, 18.530, 18.705, 18.745, 18.765, 18.775, 18.790, 18.795 and 18.810 Attached are the Site Plan, Vicinity Map and ApplicanYs Statement for your review. From information supplied by various departments and agencies and from other information available to our staff, a report and recommendation will be prepared and a decision will be rendered on the proposal in the near future. If you wish to comment on this application, WE NEED YOUR COMMENTS BACK BY: WEDNESDAY—OCTOBER 6, 1999. You may use the space provided below or attach a separate letter to return your comments. If you are unable to respond by the above date, please phone the staff contact noted above with your comments and confirm your comments in writing as soon as possible. If you have any questions, contact the Tigard Planning Division, 13125 SW Hall Boulevard, Tigard, OR 97223. PLEASE CHECK THE FOLLOWING ITEMS THAT APPLY: _ We have reviewed the proposal and have no objections to it. Please contact of our office. Please refer to the enclosed letter. � Written comments provided below: L:�� cv �'.�� i��=� t��C� �1�'lease prar,�ide the forro��nfo�rton�Name of Person[sl ommendng: �� Phone Numder[sl: � �� .� �:�l�-; CUP 1999-00001//SWAMI VISWA TEMPLE EXPANSION PROPOSAL REQUEST FOR COMMENTS REQUEST FOR COMMENTS CITY OF TIGARD Community•De�i�eCopment S�apingA BetterCommunity DATE: September 22,1999 T0: Michael Miller,Operauons Utility Manager FROM: City of Tigard Planning Division STAFF CONTACT: lulia Powell Haiduk,Associate Planner Phone: [5031639-4111/Fax: [5031684-729) CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT[CUP)1999-00001,PLANNED DEVELOPMENT REYIEW[P�R)1999-00002 VARIANCE[VARI 1999-00024 and SETBACK ADIUSTMENT[MISI 1999-00026 ➢ SWAMI VISWA TEMPLE E)iPANSION Q The applicant has requested Conditional Use Approval to expand the existing Ashram (temple). The appiicant is also requesting Planned Development approval to allow the residential use of two bedrooms for the residents and eight guestrooms. A variance has been requested to the access width. An adjustment to the front yard setback for a religious facility has also been requested. LOCATION: The site is Iocated at 11515 SW Hall Bivd. The properties are also identified as WCTM 1 S135DA Tax Lot 1400 and 3503. ZONES: C-P; Professional Commercial. APPLICABLE REVIEW CRITERIA: Community Development Code Chapters 18.330, 18.370, 18.390, 18.510, 18.530, 18.705, 18.745, 18.765, 18.775, 18.790, 18.795 and 18.810 Attached are the Site Plan, Vicinity Map and Applicant's Statement for your review. From information supplied by various departments and agencies and from other information available to our staff, a report and recommendation will be prepared and a decision will be rendered on the proposal in the near future. If you wish to comment on this application, WE NEED YOUR COMMENTS BACK BY: WEDNESDAY—OCTOBER 6, 1999. You may use the space provided below or attach a separate letter to return your comments. If you are unable to respond by the above date, please phone the staff contact noted above with your comments and confirm your comments in writing as soon as possible. If you have any questions, contact the Tigard Planning Division, 13125 SW Hall Boulevard, Tigard, OR 97223. PLEASE CNECK THE FOLLOWING ITEMS THAT APPLY: _ We have reviewed the proposal and have no objections to it. Please contact of our office. Please refer to the enclosed letter. _ Written comments provided below: �%ai5 :� j�t/ �� A-G.�T/ti� VA�U.F�i ��ATEaL ,�/�'T2�C�T �EYU//LE � �a5'.��. (�ivJ7$°��' ��i�✓c �UA�IMF�,l�1�' . J � �.' L // -� ' / �./.�':� ,; �f / tL�-t �1i� i} /.�/�"Y.i �fis- /y �.o�� %�i�i '� r- �4'lease pro�vid�e tke foc��tnfo�t�on)Name of Person[sl ommenting: �� '�� Phone Number[sl: � �� UP 1999-00001//SWAMI VISWA TEMPLE EXPANSION PROPOSAL REQUEST FOR COMMENTS REQUEST FOR COMMENTS CITY OF TIGARD Community�De�vc�opn:ent S(apingA Better Community DATE: September 22,1999 T0: Gary Lampella,Building Official RECEIVED PLANNING FROM: City of Tigard Planning Division SEP 2 9 1999 STAFF CONTACT: lulia Powell Haiduk,Associate Planner CITY OF TlGARD Phone: [5031639-41T1/Fax: [5031684-1291 CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT[CUPI 1999-00001,PIANNED DEVELOPMENT REVIEW[PDRI 1999-00002 VARIANCE[VARI 1999-00024 and SETBACK ADIUSTMENT[MISI 1999-00026 ➢ SWAMI VISWA TEMPLE EKPANSION Q The applicant has requested Conditional Use Approval to expand the existing Ashram (temple}, The applicant is also requesting Planned Development approval to allow the residential use of two bedrooms for the residents and eight guestrooms. A variance has been requested to the access width. An adjustment to the front yard setback for a religious facility has also been requested. LOCATION: The site is located at 11515 SW Hall Blvd. The properties are also identified as WCTM 1 S135DA Tax Lot 1400 and 3503. ZONES: C-P; Professional Commercial. APPLICABLE REVIEW CRITERIA: Community Development Code Chapters 18.330, 18.370, 18.390, 18.510, 18.530, 18.705, 18.745, 18.765, 18.775, 18.790, 18.795 and 18.810 Attached are the Site Plan, Vicinity Map and ApplicanYs Statement for your review. From information supplied by various departments and agencies and from other information available to our staff, a report and recommendation will be prepared and a decision will be rendered on the proposal in the near future. If you wish to comment on this application, WE NEED YOUR COMMENTS BACK BY: WEDNESDAY— OCTOBER 6, 1999. You may use the space provided below or attach a separate letter to return your comments. If you are unable to res o� nd by the above date, please phone the staff contact noted above with your comments and confirm your comments in writing as soon as possible. If you have any questions, contact the Tigard Planning Division, 13125 SW Hall Boulevard, Tigard, OR 97223. PLEASE CHECK THE FOLLOWING ITEMS THAT APPLY: _ We have reviewed the proposal and have no objections to it. Please contact of our office. Please refer to the enclosed letter. � Written comments provideAd below: .1 �() Afl in1•Lrrl�i�1 L�x� r/i✓►/i0et �hlt 6C lu�trfi�a/s� ��► 7'lv �� L�w� ��t��i�7��D'� �L� M��r / t wM g •✓ '� �1) 7c� l � tl��rc C X i �`! d� ��/L f � v f .��fj�. 721,?v�KI!� l n-- o�,/ A✓'t /''iT� � i .� ,r , s a�e s!� t �,• � ' `/�' �. b �a o,� aov sj. Ft- !v Q�lr/rn. �� IIJ 1 l.( �1 �l'- � rd)1�I�llw�'� 1^�[I�G7I�1C� �) l�i�vu� �l � 4r.�f<J. F�h� �AY A'� �it• � , � , , �. _ �_ � ,�7�TT �,,, -- - -� i,_ , � Y �! �" �TY' 'T�t'Ftt�17�� rdr�� .,rr�, L /� rm e,,,� /i�G 2 � //v[ J /� G , �'�}L I� !/-!3 �-.,.� ii ��l . 2S' �i� �'vrrlc �- � t�.cl.c a.^ Si1�c �► L, n I"^ jv��U) �rdvr�.t�t f�►'�f �r�„ck a<!�J/ -f� v►�,i+ /Su � of �'�/ �iC' ►' , r. v w� r"1 /"t t� - �1) ��M/ 7'►.a►.� / �n(J �- �-. a f K �1� r v. ,.,, Z �✓ ... r � ��YCease provide tke fo��nfo�tro��Name of Person[sl ommen in :- "" '"^ ` ° " �4� - ' s� � C�� +J �� ,� c*F� I fcV�{ Phone Number[sl: � v CUP 1999-00001//SWAMI VISWA TEMPLE EXPANSION PROPOSAL REQUEST FOR COMMENTS �1�� /t7d /`�K�L f'� �'o�'+��nt c.h - � ;=-p'F_�� I�N" �$��vq� �� .� ��\ n Department of Transportation � re�Ol j Region 1 m . .�z, .� :'u� • I �'�� John A.Kitzhaber,M.D.,Govemor 123 NW Flanders Portland,OR 97209-4037 (503)731-8200 FAX(503)731-8259 November 1, 1999 F�r.E coDE: PLA9-2A-TIG-142 City of Tigard Planning Division 13125 SE Hall Bivd. Tigard, OR 97223 Att: Julia Hajduk Subject: CUP 1999-00001, PDR 1999-00002, VAR 1999-00024, MIS 1999- 00026: Swami Viswa Temple Expansion Hall Blvd. X OR 217 Dear Ms. Hajduk, The proposed development's sole access is to Hall Blvd. According to the Oregon Highway Plan, Hall Blvd. is a State facility with a District highway classification. We have an interest in ensuring that proposed land uses do not negatively impact the safe and efficient use of this facility. We are concerned with the ability of the two lane highway access to safely accommodate the continued increase in traffic. Particularly, we are concerned that vehicles intending to enter the Kindercare site may not be able to directly turn in due to queuing which blocks the access. This could potentially cause vehicles to back up on the highway creating a potential safety problem. When the adjacent property to the north of the access road redevelops, the access should be widened to accommodate a three lane section. This improvement would alleviate ODOT's concerns. We recommend the City condition the Temple Expansion such that their peak traffic generation times do not coincide with the peak traffic generation times of the Office development to the north or the Kindercare development to the southeast of the site. This condition would allow the Temple to expand without adding traffic pressure to the highway access. We encourage the applicant to work with the property to the north of the access road as they prepare development plans to ensure that the access is widened to accommodate the needs of all the property owners who share the highway access. Farm 734-1850(1/98) � . 1 If you have any questions regarding the above comments, I can be reached at 731-8258. Please forward a copy of the Notice of Decision with conditions of approval when rendered on this case. Thank you, _ Marah Danielson Planner Development Review Cc: Chi Mia, ODOT Region 1 Sam Hunaidi, Ed Miller, ODOT District 2A MEMORANDUM CITY OF TIGARD, OREGON DATE: November 17, 1999 TO: Julia Hajduk, Associate Planner � FROM: Brian Rager, Development Review Engineer � RE: CUP1999-00001, Swami Viswa Temple Expansion Street And Utility Improvements Standards (Section 18.810� Chapter 18.810 provides construction standards for the implementation of public and private facilities and utilities such as streets, sewers, and drainage. The applicable standards are addressed below: Streets: Improvements: Section 18.810.030.A.1 states that streets within a development and streets adjacent shall be improved in accordance with the TDC standards. Section 18.810.030.A.2 states that any new street or additional street width planned as a portion of an existing street shall be dedicated and improved in accordance with the TDC. Minimum Rights-of-Way and Street Widths: Section 18.810.030(E) requires an arterial street to have a 60 to 90 right-of-way width and 12-foot lanes. Other improvements required may include on-street parking, sidewalks and bikeways, underground utilities, street lighting, storm drainage, and street trees. This site lies adjacent to SW Hall Boulevard, which is classified as an arterial on the City of Tigard Transportation Plan Map, and is under the jurisdiction of ODOT. At present, there is approximately 60 feet of ROW according to the most recent tax assessor's map. This roadway will eventually be widened to have 5 lanes with bikelanes. This type of roadway will require the full 90-foot ROW. Therefore, the applicant should dedicate additional ROW along this frontage to provide 45 feet from the centerline. SW Hall Boulevard is currently improved with a centerline-to-curb dimension of approximately 25 feet. This is an interim width approved by ODOT. There is an existing driveway apron that serves the site and other adjacent uses (Kindercare and Hall Park Office). ENGINEERING COMMENTS CUP 1999-00001 Swami Viswa Temple PAGE 1 ODOT submitted comments, dated November 1, 1999, to the City with regard to this project. ODOT is concerned about the current width of the shared access into this site. Of particular concern is the potential for vehicles intending to enter the Kindercare site backing up into Hall Boulevard due to queuing of exiting cars blocking the Kindercare access. ODOT believes the access should be widened to provide for three lanes to help alleviate this potential problem. In addition, ODOT recommends the City require the applicant to schedule their peak traffic into this site such that there is no conflict with the peak traffic periods generated by the Kindercare and Hall Park Office sites. These two issues will be covered in more detail in the Planning Department section of this report, under Section 18.705, Access, Egress, and Circulation. Sidewalks: Section 18.810.070.A requires that sidewalks be constructed to meet City design standards and be located on both sides of arterial, collector and local residential streets. There is an existing sidewalk along the frontage of SW Hall Boulevard adjacent to this site. No further sidewalk improvements are necessary. Sanitary Sewers: Sewers Required: Section 18.810.090.A requires that sanitary sewer be installed to serve each new development and to connect developments to existing mains in accordance with the provisions set forth in Design and Construction Standards for Sanitary and Surface Water Management (as adopted by the Unified Sewerage Agency in 1996 and including any future revisions or amendments) and the adopted policies of the comprehensive plan. � Over-sizing: Section 18.810.090.0 states that proposed sewer systems shall include consideration of additional development within the area as projected by the Comprehensive Plan. Sanitary sewer service for this site has been provided as a part of the Hall Park Office development. A 3-inch pressure line was installed within the shared driveway aisle and ties into the existing public sewer line in SW Hall Boulevard. The pressure sewer line is necessary due to the fact that this site is at a lower elevation that what the public line in Hall Boulevard can serve. The new building on this site must be constructed to have a sewer pump system. No further public sewer improvements are necessary. ENGINEERING COMMENTS CUP 1999-00001 Swami Viswa Temple PAGE 2 Storm Drainage: General Provisions: Section 18.810.100.A states requires developers to make adequate provisions for storm water and flood water runoff. Accommodation of Upstream Drainage: Section 18.810.100.0 states that a culvert or other drainage facility shall be large enough to accommodate potential runoff from its entire upstream drainage area, whether inside or outside the development. The City Engineer shall approve the necessary size of the facility, based on the provisions of Design and Construction Standards for Sanitary and Surface Water Management (as adopted by the Unified Sewerage Agency in 1996 and including any future revisions or amendments). The Hall Park Office development lies uphill of this site. The majority of the storm water from that development was directed to the north toward the Highway 217 ROW. The drainage plan for this site should be able to accommodate any sheet flow that reaches this site from the wooded area north of the proposed building. Effect on Downstream Drainage: Section 18.810.100.D states that where it is anticipated by the City Engineer that the additional runoff resulting from the development will overload an existing drainage facility, the Director and Engineer shall withhold approval of the development until provisions have been made for improvement of the potential condition or until provisions have been made for storage of additional runoff caused by the development in accordance with the Design and Construction Standards for Sanitary and Surtace Water Management (as adopted by the Unified Sewerage agency in 1996 and including any future revisions or amendments). In 1997, the Unified Sewerage Agency (USA) completed a basin study of Fanno Creek and adopted the Fanno Creek Watershed Management Plan. Section V of that plan includes a recommendation that local governments institute a stormwater detention/efFective impervious area reduction program resulting in no net increase in storm peak flows up to the 25-year event. The City will require that all new developments resulting in an increase of impervious surfaces provide onsite detention facilities, unless the development is located adjacent to Fanno Creek. For those developments adjacent to Fanno Creek, the storm water runoff will be permitted to discharge without detention. The applicanYs plan indicates that there will be a vegetated swale constructed adjacent to the southern boundary of the site. It is not clear whether the applicant intends for this facility to serve as a detention facility combined with surface water treatment. The applicant may need to adjust their storm drainage plan to accommodate the detention requirement. ENGINEERING COMMENTS CUP 1999-00001 Swami Viswa Temple PAGE 3 The plan also indicates that the storm water from this site will be directed to an existing storm drainage line that is located on the adjacent parcels to the east of this site. This existing private storm drainage line is located within an easement granted in favor of this site, as well as the Hall Park Office and Kindercare sites. This fact was discovered as a part of the approval for the Hall Park Office development. No public storm drainage work is necessary to support this development. Utilities: Section 18.810.120 states that all utility lines, but not limited to those required for electric, communication, lighting and cable television services and related facilities shall be placed underground, except for surFace mounted transformers, surFace mounted connection boxes and meter cabinets which may be placed above ground, temporary utility service facilities during construction, high capacity electric lines operating at 50,000 volts or above, and: • The developer shall make all necessary arrangements with the serving utility to provide the underground services; • The City reserves the right to approve location of all surface mounted facilities; • All underground utilities, including sanitary sewers and storm drains installed in streets by the developer, shall be constructed prior to the surfacing of the streets; and • Stubs for service connections shall be long enough to avoid disturbing the street improvements when service connections are made. Exception to Under-Grounding Requirement: Section 18.810.120.0 states that a developer shall pay a fee in-lieu of under-grounding costs when the development is proposed to take place on a street where existing utilities which are not underground will serve the development and the approval authority determines that the cost and technical difficulty of under- grounding the utilities outweighs the benefit of under-grounding in conjunction with the development. The determination shall be on a case- by-case basis. The most common, but not the only, such situation is a short frontage development for which under-grounding would result in the placement of additional poles, rather than the removal of above-ground utilities facilities. An applicant for a development which is served by utilities which are not underground and which are located across a public right-of-way from the applicant's property shall pay a fee in-lieu of under- grounding. ENGINEERING COMMENTS CUP 1999-00001 Swami Viswa Temple PAGE 4 There are existing overhead utility lines along SW Hall Boulevard. If the fee in- lieu is proposed, it is equal to $ 27.50 per lineal foot of street frontage that contains the overhead lines. The frontage along this site is 32 lineal feet; therefore the fee would be $ 880.00. ADDITIONAL CITY AND/OR AGENCY CONCERNS: Public Water System: This site lies within the Tualatin Valley Water District's (NWD) service area. As a part of the Hall Park Office development, domestic and fire water lines were installed to serve both that project and this project. No additional public water line work will be necessary to support this development. Storm Water Quality: The City has agreed to enforce SurFace Water Management (SWM) regulations established by the Unified Sewerage Agency (USA) Design and Construction Standards (adopted by Resolution and Order No. 96-44) which require the construction of on-site water quality facilities. The facilities shall be designed to remove 65 percent of the phosphorus contained in 100 percent of the storm water runoff generated from newly created impervious surfaces. In addition, a maintenance plan shall be submitted indicating the frequency and method to be used in keeping the facility maintained through the year. Prior to construction, the applicant shall submit plans and calculations for a water quality facility that will meet the intent of the USA Design Standards. In addition, the applicant shall submit a maintenance plan for the facility that must be reviewed and approved by the City prior to construction. As was stated above, the applicant is proposing to treat the onsite storm water runoff in a vegetated swale. It appears that the site plan has allowed enough room for an adequately sized swale. To ensure compliance with Unified Sewerage Agency design and construction standards, the applicant shall employ the design engineer responsible for the design and specifications of the private water quality facility to perform construction and visual observation of the water quality facility for compliance with the design and specifications. These inspections shall be made at significant stages throughout the project and at completion of the construction. Prior to final building inspection, the design engineer shall provide the City of Tigard (Inspection Supervisor) with written confirmation that the water quality facility is in compliance with the design and specifications. ENGINEERING COMMENTS CUP 1999-00001 Swami Viswa Temple PAGE 5 Grading and Erosion Control: USA Design and Construction Standards also regulate erosion control to reduce the amount of sediment and other pollutants reaching the public storm and surFace water system resulting from development, construction, grading, excavating, clearing, and any other activity which accelerates erosion. Per USA regulations, the applicant is required to submit an erosion control plan for City review and approval prior to issuance of City permits. Address Assignments: The City of Tigard is responsible for assigning addresses for parcels within the City of Tigard and within the Urban Service Boundary (USB). An addressing fee in the amount of$ 30.00 per address shall be assessed. This fee shall be paid to the City prior to issuance of the site and/or building permit. For this project, the addressing fee will be $30.00 to account for the new building. Recommendations: THE FOLLOWING C�NDITIONS SHALL BE SATISFIED PRIOR TO ISSUANCE OF THE SITE AND/OR BUILDING PERMIT: Submit to the Engineering Department (Brian Rager, 639-4171, ext. 318) for review and approval: 1. Prior to issuance of a site and/or building permit, the applicant shall pay an addressing fee in the amount of$30.00. 2. Additional right-of-way shall be conveyed to the State of Oregon, by and through its Department of Transportation, Highway Division, along the frontage of SW Hall Boulevard to increase the right-of-way to 45 feet from centerline. The description shall be tied to the existing right-of-way centerline. Verification that the conveyance has been submitted to the State shall be provided to the City Engineering Department. (For additional information, contact Rick Reeves, Oregon Department of Transportation, Right-of-Way Section, 123 NW Flanders, Portland, OR 97209-4037; Phone: 731-8461). ENGINEERING COMMENTS CUP 1999-00001 Swami Viswa Temple PAGE 6 3. The applicant's construction plans shall indicate that they will provide an onsite detention facility designed to meet USA design standards. 4. The applicant shall provide an on-site water quality facility as required by Unified Sewerage Agency Design and Construction Standards (adopted by Resolution and Order No. 96-44). Final plans and calculations shall be submitted to the Engineering Depa�tment (Brian Rager) for review and approval prior to issuance of the building permit. In addition, a proposed maintenance plan shall be submitted along with the plans and calculations for review and approval. 5. The applicant shall either place the existing overhead utility lines along SW Hall Boulevard underground as a part of this project, or they shall pay the fee in-lieu of undergrounding. The fee shall be calculated by the frontage of the site that is parallel to the utility lines and will be $ 27.50 per lineal foot. If the fee option is chosen, the amount will be $ 880.00 and it shall be paid prior to issuance of a site and/or building permit. THE FOLLOWING CONDITIONS SHALL BE SATISFIED PRIOR TO A FINAL BUILDING INSPECTION: Submit to the Engineering Department (Brian Rager, 639-4171, ext. 318) for review and approval: 6. To ensure compliance with Unified Sewerage Agency design and construction standards, the applicant shall employ the design engineer responsible for the design and specifications of the private water quality facility to perForm construction and visual observation of the water quality facility for compliance with the design and specifications. These inspections shall be made at significant stages, and at completion of the construction. Prior to final building inspection, the design engineer shall provide the City of Tigard (Inspection Supervisor) with written confirmation that the water quality facility is in compliance with the design and specifications. Staff Contact: Hap Watkins, Building Division. i:lenglbrianrlcommentslcuplcup1999-00001.bdr.doc ENGINEERING COMMENTS CUP 1999-00001 Swami Viswa Temple PAGE 7 ' REQUEST FOR COMMENTS CITY OF TIGARD �'ommunity 9UeveCopment ` S�apingA�etter�'ommunity DATE: September 22,1999 T0: PER ATTACHED FROM: City of Tigard Plannin9 DiVision STAFF CONTACT: lulia Powell Halduk,Associate Planner Phone: [5031639-4171/fax: [503]684-1291 CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT[CUPI 1999-00001,PLANNED DEVELOPMENT REVIEW[PDRI 1999-00002 VARIANCE[VAR]1999-00024 and SETBACK ADlUSTMENT[MISI 1999-00026 ➢ SWAMI VISWA TEMPLE ERPANSION Q The applicant has requested Conditional Use Approval to expand the existing Ashram (temple). The applicant is also requesting Planned Development approval to allow the residential use of two bedrooms for the residents and eight guestrooms. A variance has been requested to the access width. An adjustment to the front yard setback for a religious facility has also been requested. LOCATION: The site is located at 11515 SW Hall Blvd. The properties are also identified as WCTM 1S135DA Tax Lot 1400 and 3503. ZONES: C-P; Professional Commercial. APPLICABLE REVIEW CRITERIA: Community Development Code Chapters 18.330, 18.370, 18.390, 18.510, 18.530, 18.705, 18.745, 18.765, 18.775, 18.790, 18.795 and 18.810 Attached are the Site Plan, Vicinity Map and ApplicanYs Statement for your review. From information supplied by various departments and agencies and from other information available to our staff, a report and recommendation will be prepared and a decision will be rendered on the proposal in the near future. If you wish to comment on this application, WE NEED YOUR COMMENTS BACK BY: WEDNESDAY— OCTOBER 6, 1999. You may use the space provided below or attach a separate letter to return your comments. If you are unable to respond by the above date, please phone the staff contact noted above with your comments and confirm your comments in writing as soon as possible. If you have any questions, contact the Tigard Planning Division, 13125 SW Hall Boulevard, Tigard, OR 97223. PLEASE CHECK THE FOLLOWING ITEMS THAT APPLY: _ We have reviewed the proposal and have no objections to it. Please contact of our office. Please refer to the enclosed letter. _ Written comments provided below: ��lease provi�e tke foao��tnfo�tton�Name of Person[sl ommenting: Phone Number[sl: CUP 1999-00001//SWAMI VISWA TEMPLE EXPANSION PROPOSAL REQUEST FOR COMMENTS REQUESTFOR COMMENTS NOTIfICATION LIST FOR LAND USE&COMMUNITY DEYELOPMENTAPPLICATIONS , CITArea:[Cl [El [Sl[Wl CITIZEN INVOLVEMENTTFAMS B-]Placefarrevtewinll6raryClTBook[sl t fiLE NO[S]: � , �: ; ' � FILE NAME[Sl: „�...,a,.,; .'�s��_,_. r . ' CITY OffICES LONG RANGE PLANNING/Nadine Smith,s��N��. COMMUNITY DVLPMNT.DEPT./o.�Pm��s��s Te��K�a�= POLICE DEPT./Jim Wolf,c��,�P�e�e��q�onKe� :$UILDING DIVJDavid Scott,a,+d,�o�,K�a� �ENGINEERING OEPTJBrian Rager,o�Pm��ke��we��e� WATER DEPT./Michael Miller,u��sMa��e, CITY ADMINISTRATION/Cathy Wheatley,cnyR��o�� OPERATIONS DEPT./John Roy,ao��tiMa��a� OTHER SPECIAL DISTRICTS TUAL.HILLS PARK&REC.DIST.� '— TUALATIN VALLEY FIRE&RESCUE � '_TUALATIN VALLEY WATER DISTRICT��UNIFIED SWRGE.AGENCY� Planning Manager Fire Marshall Administrative Office Julia Huffman/SWM Program 15707 SW Walker Road Washington County Fire District PO Box 745 155 N. First Street BeaveRon,OR 97006 (place in pick-up box) Beaverton,OR 97075 Hillsboro,OR 97124 LOCAL AN�STATE IURISDICTIONS CITY OF BEAVERTON � CITY OF TUALATIN jlt OR.DEPT.OF FlSH 8 WILDLIFE OR.DIV.OF STATE LANDS Planning Manager Planning Manager 2501 SW First Avenue 775 Summer Street,NE Mike Matteucci,Neqnwna coob PO Box 369 PO Box 59 Salem,OR 97310-1337 PO Box 4755 Tualatin,OR 97062 Portland,OR 97207 Beaverton,OR 97076 _OR.PUB.UTILITIES COMM. _METRO GROWTH MANAGEMENT� _OR.DEPT.OF GEO.&MINERAL IND. 550 Capitol Street,NE _CITY OF DURHAM � Manager,Community Development 800 NE Oregon Street,Suite 5 Salem,OR 97310-1380 City Manager 600 NE Grand Avenue Portland,OR 97232 PO Box 23483 Portland,OR 97232-2736 US ARMY CORPS.OF ENG. Durham,OR 97281-3483 OR.DEPT.OF LAND CONSERV.B DVLP 333 SW First Avenue 635 Capitol Street NE,Suite 200 PO Box 2946 _CITY OF KING CITY� Salem,OR 97301-2540 Portland,OR 97208-2946 City Manager _METRO AREA BOUNDARY COMMISSION 15300 SW 116th Avenue 800 NE Oregon Street OREGON DEPT.OF TRANS.(ODOT) WASHINGTON COUNTY jM King City,OR 97224 Building#16,Suite 540 Aeronautics Division Dept.of Land Use&Trans. Portland,OR 97232-2109 Tom Highland,P�� 155 N.First Avenue CITY OF LAKE OSWEGO� 3040 25th Street,SE Suite 350,MS 13 Planning Director �OR.DEPT.OF ENERGY Salem,OR 97310 Hillsboro,OR 97124 PO Box 369 Bonneville Power Administration _Brent Curtis tcaa5� Lake Oswego,OR 97034 Routing TTRC-Attn: Renae Ferrera �ODOT,REGION 1 � Scott King�cPa•:� PO Box 3621 Sonya Kazen,o��n.a�.c�b. _Mike Borreson ie��.� CITY OF PORTLAND Portland,OR 97208-3621 123 NW Flanders Jim Tice ncn•6� David Knowles,�,�,o e��o��. Portland,OR 97209-4037 Tom Ha ffY(CurtMd PI.Apps.) Portland Building 106,Rm. 1002 _OREGON,DEPT.OF ENVIRON.QUALITY _Phil Healyca.*e�nai.a,vvs.> 1120 SW Fifth Avenue 811 SW Sixth Avenue ✓ODOT,REGION 1 -DISTRICT 2A� _Sr.Cartographer coP�ac�,MS,. Portland,OR 97204 Portland,OR 97204 Jane Estes,r�scea�a� 5440 5W Westgate Drive,Suite 350 ODOT,REGION 1 -DISTRICT 2A Portland,OR 97221-2414 Right-of-Way Section N�a�> Rick Reeves 123 NW Flanders Portland,OR 97209-4037 UTILITY PROVIDERS AND SPECIAL AGENCIES PORTLAND WESTERN R/R, BURLINGTON NORTHERNlSANTA FE R/R,OREGON ELECTRIC R/R(Burongton Northem/santa Fe wR Predecessor) Robert I.Melbo,President 8 General Manager 110 W. 10th Avenue Albany,OR 97321 SOUTHERN PACIFIC TRANS.CO.R/R METRO AREA COMMUNICATIONS �TCI CABLEVISION OF OREGON v TRI-MET TRANSIT DVLPMT. Clifford C.Cabe,Construction Engineer Debra Palmer�n��s oMr� Pat McGann Michael Kiser,Project Planner 5424 SE McLoughlin Boulevard Twin Oaks Technology Center 14200 SW Brigad4on Court 710 NE Holladay Street Portland,OR 97232 1E15 NW 169th Place,S-&020 Beaverton,OR 97005 Portland,OR 97232 Beaverton,OR 97006-4886 �PORTLAND GENERAL ELECTRIC �NW NATURAL GAS COMPANY �_GENERAL TELEPHONE ✓US WEST COMMUNICATIONS Brian Moore,Svc.Design Consulta�t Scott Palmer Elaine Self,Engineering Patty Stambaugh,Engineering 9480 SW Boeckman Road 220 NW Second Avenue MC: OR030546 8021 SW Capitol Hill Rd,Rm 110 Wilsonville,OR 97070 Portland,OR 97209-3991 Tigard,OR 97281-3416 Portland,OR 97219 TIGARD/TUALATIN SCHOOL DIST.#23J_BEAVERTON SCHOOL DIST.#48 TCI CABLE�npps.e.o�Hamt�o�sewJ Marsha Butler,Administrative Offices Joy-Gay Pahl,Demographs&Planning Dept. Diana Carpenter 13137 SW Pacific Highway 16550 SW Mer10 Road 3500 SW Bond Street Tigard,OR 97223 Beaverton,OR 97006 Portland,OR 97232 � -IMO1CApSi At/FOMA►��C'l�{?SIi1tA810N fi W{"BEI!11�1 841�' OP�l�t i{'/B�LCf�RO�EBPr FOA AMS/ALL CI�'FR0.7LCtf. /IR01LCi ILAMMiA Ii AlZYONlI61L fOA/NOICArINC IA.Ai/Lt i'O NOi/lIJ h�patty�mastersktcnotice.mst �-Sep-99 j� 3�c� :m �� .'S�� , �I�3�9 9 �^� .� �y � ,��{/'�/ ,�,� /�/ �.{ /' `^ � - �� / � � �� W° 7 '�� '�� 1.� ,.� .� �l �_�� J��,� �� /V f�' �O"J�� X ,, _� . • • Shape. '..PolY9�n. ___ Mnirnize � . ....... ...... ..... .... r.rea 14870.92232 . . ..................................................:...................... Penmeter 535 85784 ' _ _. __ :........_....... ..................L..,.r" "- Taxlot 719 ' ..:.................. ................... .. .... ......... ......... ..... Taxlot �d ...... .............................. ...... ....... ... ........ ......... ....... .. < .. ....� . ....:... ..................................................................................................................... Tlid._.... .........� 1S135DD013.... ; .. ....;... __....._.< ............................................................................................:......................__.. Ownersort ; S _.............................................................._....._..............................._ _ ; _.._.... ......... ... ......................__...... .........................................................._..._............_... Ownerl TEELE,NANCY TRUSTEF : ................................................................................................................................................< .............................................................................................. ......................................................;........................... Owner2 11660 SW HALL BLVD ........................................................................................................................................... : .................... _................................................................................... .................... Owner3 ..........................................................................................................._; ° _ ............................... ............................................... ........ Owneradd i _..................................................................................................................................._...........__._._.__; __.._................................................................................................:...................................................................._i...................___... i Ownercity ; TIGARD ; ........... . .. ........ ... .................................... .. _< ........................................... ... ..:.. ............. .... ................. . Ownerstat OR ... ... __.< ...........................................................:...... .. .. OwnerziP. ;_97223 ; ...............................................................................................................................................................< .......................:.................................................................................................... ..............................................................................................................._. s Sitestmo 11660 i _ _.._ ___, _.......__._......._._..................................:.................................................................. S iteaddr ` ...........................................................................................................................................................: 11660 SW HALL BLVD .......................................................................:........................_... ` Sitecitk.._........i........................................ __.._: :......................................................................:..............._......._... ........................................................_......................................................................................... Landval ; 63040.00 ............................................... ......................................................................................_.... ....._. ,......................................................................:......................................................................;..................._...... Bldgval....._....i__74220,00..............................._........._i. : ..............................................................................__... _ Totalval i 137260.00 _... ......_._......__ ............................_................................._......._..................................................___.< ......................................:... B ldgsqfl 2528 ' _ , :.. ...... : A t acres 0 40 ....... .............................. . ............ . ...................... ...... .. Yearbudr 1927 ' _... . __. Landuse ; � .........................................................................................._................................................._..............._< _.,......................................................................:.................................................................. TexcodE ; 023.81 ...............................................................................................................................................: .....................................t...................................................................._;............................. Saledate 07/03/96 ..................................................................................................................................................................: .................................,......................................................................i...................................................................._�.........._................. ...... .............._ € Salep�ic?... .._000 i + . _.__.. _ _< _....._............ . ...... . ,_. . ......................................................................................... s County i ......................... ...................................................................< ....................;..........................................................................................................................................;.... ............................................... Prop code...:.._101......... .................. ...................... ...................................................................................< ................................................................................................;......... ......................................... .......... .... ......... ................................................................................: Date............'.._19891201.........................................i......................................................................s............................ .............. ..� i Accour�. ..., R276882 '• i ................ .................................................................... ..... _..._.......................:.............................................................:_...................................._.__......._.._................................__ ..................................... . ........................................................... ' _X_coord 762D809.37100 � ....................... ...............................................< ......................................................................................:...................................................................._j..... ; Y_coord ? 653133.95744 i .................................. ... .................................................................................................................... ........................................................................................................................................................:_........_................. Cormients i ' ......................... .................................................................................................. ................................_i ........,........................;......................................................................:...................................................................._:............................. ............... ............................................................................................................_ _ : _Zipcode......._?.._97223....................._.._._.._.................:.....................................................................;................_..._.. : . .............................................................................................................. ... ......................._:......................................................................;..................._................................................_;............................ ' Cleer Clear All � � ► _F_i 1 � �' \ J��1 �� `� ,� �r i �i�S��Di3CY� �,� 1 ! �� /t'�' _ � t �.�� ,�.�.�.� � 3 9 - 7��I � � � � ��, �o� �.�� - �o . � � �17d 8`I- � r t ;� ��y� / ,(/� ��'""f `�- � ,�yn�- � ��n� ��,su-x- , �`i�'i �� --�.� -� ��-, , � � `�`�� `��d 'S ' ,�- �, ��d �� --� i��, � _ �� , I�� o� '«� ,. � Tj�;� ;�,;;n.t� lcs� 0/�' (�l/`'�''�j7 ��'�'� �� / ��r� � � � � ,� � , � � �� ? . � �� - � � � �� ' � �� ; � NOU-03-1999 15�29 WASHCO A&T 1ST FLOOR 50368139�9 P.01 � SIqMARY OF �AXES FQR i�#SHItr...�� CaMTY TAX C0.LECTIONS � s '- ' ; , � . �G��1�'� ��7'�' , ! � Droperty: R27b882 1S135Dp-�I� �3.81 �/ � � ' _ � _ _ ACAE5 .48 '_ `�,�j L�-� � _ - �- �2;� f�' � f ` �- < � � r ; �� STE�I.f, Ni�ICY TR�TTEE (3�@4821 � PO BtiJI 23�D5T ' � ,�( � TI6ARD, OR 97P81 �� [.�u�5/�'�� , f �k� � : � � ` .� ��-7�9 7 � ; ' _ r �� `� � ��. T,4..y� ' i �20�-- � ; � �J ,:�1 � t ' , � I � i INTEREST AND nl�Ol�i7S BaSED ON A PAY�NT DAT� DN OR BffORf 11/15/1999 i ID� Eill ID Levied Tax Tax Paid Interest A�aunt Paid pate Paid i. r IB.33Z8799 (&ILLII� CHARGE) �-- r ` 3,80 8511fi194 Z. I6.936b24 I�ILLING CHARGE) 3.dB 82/�9194 3. 19.942�514 IB�L�IH6 f�lAR6El 1.58 9�/15/96 4. IB.9�b243 IaILLIl6 aRR6El 1.58 82/15/45 ' S. iH.9523344 IB3LI�IN6 {�1pR6E) L 56 95l15/96 b. I9.558858 (BZ1.I�IN6 �SE) 1.58 A?JA5/96 7, I8.962�469 {B3LLIN6 aiARGE) 1.58 A5/14/97 : 8. IB.%b136 (BS1l�Ii�6 �) 1.58 82/13/97 : , 9, 1993.15�57� B 1�5Z1.29 1,521.29 1,521.23 �5J26/94 lb. 1944.53073 A 1�439.83 1,r►.;8.83 1,t38.03 85/t5/95 : 11. 1995.4854 B � 1'347.17 1�3A7.�7 t,347,17 �/15/96 ' 1P. 1956.158b93 0 1�648.A8 1,646.AB 1,648.08 85/14/97 ' 13. 1997.156525 8 1`�2.78 1,382.7� t�38�.78 B5/i4/98 , 14. 194B.1be287 Q 1�337.01 f,337.@1 1,337.�1 85/I7l99 I IS. Current Taxes jfar biIl 1999.16�Sti89, Levied taY af i�291.26 Third bate Oue L'eviM 1'ar Tax Aue IntPreSt Third Due Balanca Due 1J3 due Nov 15 ' �43�.42 43@,42 430.� 438.42 ' 2!3 I�3@.42 43@.�2 (17.�21 413.28 843,b2 313 �43@.42 43e,42 (21.52} 488.9� 1,c5C.52 ; Total Discount 139.74? ENO OF SIAMWRY � TAXEB ; ; � � Pa6E 1 OF 1 � f � : i ' I , , � I i ; { , , ; ' Tf'IT�I P f,11 ` • � �r�t�,! �-�S�iravL� 0 SAMUEL&JANET HOL1�S CLARENCE&MARY JEAN BRAZIL NIICHAEL NEDELISKY 12215 SW 33Rd Ave PO Box 2306�1 25 82Nd Dr Portland,OR 97219 Tigard, OR 97281 Gladstone,OR 97027 KAULUWAI CORPORATION OB�MEDIA CORP PREMANANDA ASHRAM BRAHMA 2445 Makiki Heights Dr#A �211 W 11Th Ave 11515 SW Hall Blvd Honolulu,HI 96822 Eugene, OR 97402 Tigard, OR 97223 ASHRAMA BRAHMAPREMANANDA HARRY SCHAFFER&E Lillian M KENNETH BROYLES&A Jennie 11515 SW Hall Blvd 11245 SW 90Th Ave 11260 SW 90Th Ave Tigard;OR 97223 Tigard, OR 97223 Tigard, OR 97223 ROBERT&ROSE HEINTZ BRENT MCTAGGART STEPHEN FREEDMAN&Candace Arch 11275 SVi/90Th Ave PO Bos 231207 11300 SW 90'Th Ave Tigazd,OR 97223 Tigard,OR 97281 Tigazd, OR 97223 BII..LY JACOBY&J Valerie ALICIA&RICHAEtD VICE MARTIN NIARIA JUNG 11325 SW 90Th Ave 11375 SW 90Th Ave 11400 SW 90Th Ave Tigard, QR 97223 Tigard,OR 97223 Tigard, OR 97223 NANCY&RONALD HEITZ MATTHEW FORI�IAN&A Kathleen C KENT 8i LISA POWLOSKI 11401 SW 90Th Ave 11403 SW 90Th Ave 11405 SW 90Th Ave Tigard,OR 97223 Tigard.OR 9�223 Tigard, OR 97223 HAROLD WORSECH&K Sandra WII.,LIAM&STEPHANIE SNYDER THOMAS&DORIS DOLL 11450 SW 90Th Ave 11480 SW 90Th Ave 11500 SW 90Th Ave Tigard, OR 97223 Tigard,OR 97223 Tigard, OR 97223 BEHROOZ& SHEILA ANSARI DEANNA MARIE QUII.LEN ALAN&SOOK I�E BAXTER 11540 SW 90Th Ave 11560 SW 90Th Ave 11650 SW 90Th Ave Tigard,OR 97223 Tigard, OR 97223 Tigard, OR 97223 DOREEN GRIGG BONME&NORMAN ALANDER DON GR.AHAM&Paul Brossia 11700 SW 90Th Ave PO,Box 2619 11260 SW Hall Blvd Tigard,OR 97223 White Ciry, OR 97503 Tigard, OR 97223 MARGARET ANN BROWN PAi1L BROSSIA& Don Graham LN PROPERTIES LLC 19065 SW Johnson St 3U0 �Th St 11475 SW Hall Blvd Beaverton, OR 97006 Lake Oswego, OR 97034 Tigard, OR 97223 L N PROPERTIES LLC KINDER-CARE LEARNING CNTRS INC KEIICO PANG 12725 5W 66Th Ave Estate Tax Real �6-1-t2 Hololio St Portland, OR 97223 1777 NE Loop�t10#1250 Kaneohe, HI 9674=1 San Antonio,TX 78217 GERALD &10AN CACH ANNA SAYLER MILTON BROWN 1252� SW Main 5t PO Box 23757 2106 SE Ochoco St Tigard,OR 97223 Tigard,OR 97281 Milwaukie, OR 97222 RAY BARNETT&Mabel Amos SHAWN ROBERTS ELEANOR SCHLAGER&Diana Ashbur PO Box 230025 11635 SW Hall Blvd#8 11635 SW Hall Blvd#1 Tigard, OR 97281 Tigard, OR 97223 Tigard, OR 97223 CHARLES MENDEL&J Winifred ROBBIN KAY HALL SOLIS JACINTO ULUAN&Mae Rachell 11635 SW Hall Blvd#5 11635 SW Hall Blvd#3 11635 SW Hall Blvd#10 Tigard, OR 97223 Tigard, OR 97223 Tigard, OR 97223 CORRINE ti�LNS &Cathv Lee Price STEVEN PF-III..L�S JOI�1 PAiJL LAWSON JR. 11635 SW Hall Blvd#14 11635 SW Hall Blvd#11 l 1635 SW Hall Blvd#15 Tigard, OR 97223 Tigard, OR 97223 Tigard. OR 97223 ROLAND CHRISTENSEN RAY HAROLD BARNETT&Mabel Amos SAI�LANTHA WRIGH'f-VOSIKA 11635 SW Hall Blvd#17 PO Box 230025 Brvon Keith Johnson Tigard,OR 97223 Tigard, OR 97281 1163� SW Hall Blvd#18 Tigard, OR 97223 1 S135DD,0100 KAFtEN MEEHAN Nancy Steele, Trustee GARY BRADFORD 11635 SW Hall Blvd#9 P.O. BOX 230057 305 E STh St Tigard, OR 97223 Tigard, OR 97281 The Dalles, OR 970�8 SEAN&NSTINE VIRMG DONALD IVAN&MARY LOOFBOURO ELIZABETH COSHOW Ove&Den Arvidson 11410 SW Lomita Ave 11�25 SW Lomita Ave 11�05 SW Lomita Ave Portland, OR 97223 Tigard, OR 97223 Tigard, OR 97223 RICHARD MURRAY&Lowana CLIFFORD&CYNI'I-iIA BERGER LINDA BOUSE&John Bouse 11�40 SW Lomita Ave 11-t5� SW Lomita Ave 11=�70 SW Lomita Ave Tigard, OR 97223 Tigard, OR 97223 Tigazd, OR 97223 JEFFREY Hi1GHES &10 Bare Tami MARTHA HOCKETT APPLETON PROPERTLES [NC l L�85 5W Lomita Ave 11�02 SW Lomita Ave 71O0 SW Hampton St#103 Tigard, OR 97223 Tigard, OR 97223 Tigard, OR 97223 'I'pNIIv1Y I-�NRY NEBERT 8c E Susan DAVID&BETTY FITZPATRICK ANDREW I-�RBERHOLZ&L Florence 11530 SW Lomita Ave 761� SW Chestnut St 9G20 SW 9UTh Ave Tigard, OR 97223 Tigard, OR 97223 Portland,OR 97223 LARRY HERBERHOLZ TIIvIOTHY MCLOUG�II.IN&K Yvonne PING-JUI KAI WANG 9620 SW 90Th Ave 5�00 SW 198Th Ave 22600 SW 93Rd Ter Portland,OR 97223 Aloha, OR 97007 Tuatatin, OR 97062 7EROIvIE PARKER FERN MACKINNON&Virginia Dale JANG&YON SOON OH �320 SW Macadam Ave 11625 SW Lomita Ave 11630 SW Lomita Ave Portland,OR 97201 Tigard, OR 97223 Tigazd,OR 97223 DAVID &MARINA STARLING TIGARD PROPERTIES INC DAVID EMAMI 32 Independence Ave 2106 SE Ochoco St 3380 Barrington Dr Lake Grove,OR 97035 Milwaukie,OR 97222 West Linn,OR 97068 DONALD SCHAEFFER&Michael Munch PO Bo.c 82��19 Portland, OR 97282 . ' � �� ^ AFFIDAVIT OF MAILIHG CITYOFTIGARD �'orrtnturuty�L�eveCopntent ,S(wping f1 BetterCommunity S7A�o�o�,�Go.� ) . County of 4Nashington )ss. City of 7�igard ) I, �atricia L. Lunsford, being first duly sworn/affirm, on oath depose and say that I am an Adminutrative Spec�aCrst II for the City of7tgard, `iNashington County, Oregon and that I served the following: (Check Apqopriate Boz(s)8ebw} NOTICE OF PENDING LAND USE APPLICATION FOR: — AMENDED NOTICE (File No.lName Reference) - City of Tigard Planning Director �' NOTICE OF DECISION fOR: — AMENDED NOTICE (file NoJName Re(erence) - City of Tigard Planning Director ❑X NOTICEOFPUBLICHEARING FOR: � [UP1999-00001/PDR1999-00002/VAR1999-00024/MIS1999-00026 SWAMI VISWA PREMANANDA TEMPLE ADDITION / I I/22/99 — AMENDED NOTICE (File No./Name Reference) (Date of Public Heanng) .- City of Tigard Planning Director � Tigard Hearings Officer 0 Tigard Planning Commission r Tigard City Council ❑ NOTICE OF FINAL ORDER FOR:� I r-i AMENDED NOTICE (File No./Name Reterence) (Date of Pubiic hiearings) �� City of Tigard Planning Director � Tigard Hearings Officer �; Tigard Planning Commission � Tigard City Council NTIE F: (TypeJKind of Notice) FOR: � I (File NolName Reterence) (Date of Public Heanng,if appliqWe) A copy of the PUBLIC HEARIN6 NOTICE/NOTICE OF DECISION/NOTICE OF FINAL ORDER/OTHER NOTICE[S] of which is attached, marked �lthlblt "A", was mailed to each named person(s) at the address(s) shown on the attached list(s), marked Exhlblt"B'� on the 1"day of Nouember,1999, and deposited in the United States Mail on the 1"day of November,1999, postage prepaid. � % /" �, . � �� -- / / ��L/ / � i n ;�l� ( on that Pre r�d Noti Subscribed and swom/affirmed before me on the � day of �- , �. o��ca,�seu �Ci 1 H ; DiANE M JELDERICS •'� NOT/IRY PUBUC.pRE�OM coMM�ss�,No.a�e My Commission Expire . MY CO�AMISSION D(PIRES SEPT.07,Z003 I�TICE TO�IORTGACEE, LIENH� =R,VENDOR OR SELLER: ��j�j;;�� q THE TIGARD DEVELOPMENT CODE REQUIRES THAT IF YOU RECEIVE THIS NOTICE, IT SHALL BE PROMPTLY FORWARDED TO THE PURCHASER. CITY OF TIGARD Commur�ity<t�e��e(c>y�nent Skaping�Better�'ommunity PUBLIC HEARING NOTICE NOTICE IS HEREBY GIVEN THAT THE TIGARD PLANNING COMMISSION, AT A MEETING ON MONDAY. NOVEMBER 22, 1999 AT 7:30 PM, IN THE TOWN HALL OF THE TIGARD CIVIC CENTER, 13125 SW HALL BOULEVARD, TIGARD, OREGON 97223 TO CONSIDER THE FOLLOWING APPLICATION: FILE NO(S).: CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT[CUPI 1999-00001 PLANNED DEVELOPMENT REVIEW[PDRI 1999-00002 VARIANCE[VARI 1999-00024 SETBACK ADIUSTMENT[MISI 1999-00026 FILE TITLE: SWAMI VISWA TEMPLE F�[PANSION APPLICANT/ PLANNING OWNER: Swami Viswa Premananda CONSULTANT: Alpha Engineering 11515 SW Hall Boulevard Mike Miller, Project Manager Tigard, OR 97223 Plaza West, Suite 230 9600 SW Oak Street Portland, OR 97223 REQUEST: The applicant has requested Conditional Use Approval to expand the existing Ashram (temple). The applicant is also requesting Planned Development approval to allow the residential use of two bedrooms for the residents and eight guestrooms. A variance has been requested to the access width. An adjustment to the front yard setback for a religious facility has also been requested. LOCATION: The site is located at 11515 SW Hall Boulevard. The properties are also identified as WCTM 1S135DA, Tax Lots 1400 and 3503. ZONE: C-P; Professional Commercial. APPLICABLE REVIEW CRITERIA: Community Development Code Chapters 18.330, 18.370, 18.390, 18.510, 18.530, 18.705, 18.745, 18.765, 18.775, 18.790, 18.795 and 18.810. THE PUBLIC HEARING ON THIS MATTER WILL BE CONDUCTED IN ACCORDANCE WITH THE RULES OF CHAPTER 18.390 OF THE COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT CODE AND RULES OF PROCEDURE ADOPTED BY THE TIGARD PLANNING COMMISSION AND CITY COUNCIL AND AVAILABLE AT CITY HALL. ASSISTIVE LISTENING DEVICES ARE AVAILABLE FOR PERSONS WITH IMPAIRED HEARING. THE CITY WILL ALSO ENDEAVOR TO ARRANGE FOR QUALIFIED SIGN LANGUAGE INTERPRETERS AND QUALIFIED BILINGUAL INTERPRETERS UPON REQUEST. PLEASE CALL (503) 639-4171, EXT. 320 (VOICE) OR (503) 684-2772 (TDD - TELECOMMUNICATIONS DEVICES FOR THE DEAF) NO LESS THAN ONE WEEK PRIOR TO THE HEARING TO MAKE ARRANGEMENTS. CUP1999-00001/SWAMI VISWA TEMPLE EXPANSION NOTICE OF 11/22/99 PLANNING COMMISSION PUBLIC HEARING AFJYONE WI�HING TO PRESENT 1� fTEN TESTIMONY ON THIS PROPC 1 ACTION MAY DO SO IN WRITING PRIOR TO OR AT THE PUBLIt, HEARING. ORAL TESTIMONY MAY BE PRES��TED AT THE PUBLIC HEARING. AT THE PUBLIC HEARING, THE PLANNING COMMISSION WILL RECEIVE A STAFF REPORT PRESENTATION FROM THE CITY PLANNER, OPEN THE PUBLIC HEARING, AND INVITE BOTH ORAL AND WRITTEN TESTIMONY. THE PLANNING COMMISSION MAY CONTINUE THE PUBLIC HEARING TO ANOTHER MEETING TO OBTAIN ADDITIONAL INFORMATION OR CLOSE THE PUBLIC HEARING AND TAKE ACTION ON THE APPLICATION. IF A PERSON SUBMITS EVIDENCE OR DOCUMENTS LESS THAN 7 DAYS PRIOR TO THE PUBLIC HEARING DATE, THE HEARINGS AUTHORITY MAY ALLOW A CONTINUANCE OF THE HEARING, SUBJECT TO ORS 215.428 OR 227.178. IF THERE IS NO CONTINUANCE GRANTED AT THE HEARING, ANY PARTICIPANT IN THE HEARING MAY REQUEST THAT THE RECORD REMAIN OPEN FOR AT LEAST SEVEN (7) DAYS AFTER THE HEARING. A REQUEST THAT THE RECORD REMAIN OPEN CAN BE MADE ONLY AT THE FIRST EVIDENTIARY HEARING (ORS 197.763(6). INCLUDED IN THIS NOTICE IS A LIST OF APPROVAL CRITERIA APPLICABLE TO THE REQUEST FROM THE TIGARD COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT CODE AND THE TIGARD COMPREHENSIVE PLAN. APPROVAL OR DISAPPROVAL OF THE REQUEST BY THE PLANNING COMMISSION WILL BE BASED UPON THE CRITERIA LISTED OR OTHER CRITERIA IN THE COMPREHENSIVE PLAN OR DEVELOPMENT CODE WHICH THE PERSON BELIEVES TO APPLY TO THE DECISION. AT THE HEARING IT IS IMPORTANT THAT COMMENTS RELATING TO THE REQUEST PERTAIN SPECIFICALLY TO THE APPLICABLE CRITERIA IN THE COMPREHENSIVE PLAN OR THE DEVELOPMENT CODE. FAILURE TO RAISE AN ISSUE IN PERSON OR BY LETTER AT SOME POINT PRIOR TO THE CLOSE OF THE HEARING ON THE REQUEST, ACCOMPANIED BY STATEMENTS OR EVIDENCE SUFFICIENT TO ALLOW THE HEARINGS AUTHORITY AND ALL PARTIES TO RESPOND PRECLUDES AN APPEAL, AND FAILURE TO SPECIFY THE CRITERION FROM THE COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT CODE OR COMPREHENSIVE PLAN AT WHICH A COMMENT IS DIRECTED PRECLUDES AN APPEAL TO THE LAND USE BOARD OF APPEALS BASED ON THAT ISSUE. ALL DOCUMEN i S AND APPLICABLE CRITERIA IN THE ABOVE-NOTED FILE ARE AVAILABLE FOR INSPECTION AT NO COST OR COPIES CAN BE OBTAINED FOR TWENTY-FIVE CENTS (25�) PER PAGE, OR THE CURRENT RATE CHARGED FOR COPIES AT THE TIME OF THE REQUEST. AT LEAST SEVEN (7) DAYS PRIOR TO THE HEARING, A COPY OF THE STAFF REPORT WILL BE AVAILABLE FOR INSPECTION AT NO COST, OR A COPY CAN BE OBTAINED FOR TWENTY-FIVE CENTS (25G) PER PAGE, OR THE CURRENT RATE CHARGED FOR COPIES AT THE TIME OF THE REQUEST. FOR FURTHER INFORMATION PLEASE CONTACT THE STAFF PLANNER 111118 POWCII H81dUlf AT (503)639-4171, TIGARD CITY HALL, 13125 SW HALL BOULEVARD, TIGARD, OREGON 97223. m ---- . -- _-�T ......... ...... . .. � � i VICINITY MAP ��V '�t, �, —C—_—� i � --� _ _ � i --- — ____-------- ' � —, -------- -- �'i `� ' — CUP1999-DUu01 — � j� � � — PDR1999-00002 �� u— VAR1999-D00�4 -- --s?-- � ,'._ --r,�� , I � MIS1999-00026 � ��i' � � � I �m � ____________ c�n�� I<� � � � SWAMI VISWA ---r—I°'' i �_ _� '� �� TEMPLE EXPANSION ' r---'�� 2 SUBJECT � � )--.� � TAX LOTS -�J -� / � I I _ PFAFFLE ��'—�—�� ./:- - -- I <— � .�� -- — --� �� . � ' `__ _�� w� - ` >� - ' `�<, � � ��i , , '- � -- - - �, � < � -� �� , �,' - � ,� _,m _� �-� � . V l� LOMITA '-�� N �� ' � � �� Y�� I � �� .��_ � � � � � � � �,M1� �� •C�\/�� ±mw Mr.�.n.� —� I' � •- /_� r",.�,�':".m CUP1999-00001/SWAMI VISWA TEMPLE EXPANSION NOTICE OF 11/22/99 PLANNING COMMISSION PUBLIC HEARING . . . . � �`��.an�( A 5 l� ra,�.L � � ��I�z T B SAMUEL&JANET HOLMES CLARENCE&MARY JEAN BRAZIL I�IICHAEL NEDELISKY 12215 SW 33Rd Ave PO Box 23064 25 82Nd Dr Portland, OR 97219 Tigard,OR 97281 Gladstone, OR 97027 KAULUWAI CORPORATION OBIE MEDIA CORP PREMANANDA ASHRAM BRAHMA 2445 Makiki Heights Dr#A 4211 W 11Th Ave 11515 SW Hall Blvd Honolulu,HI 96822 Eugene, OR 97402 Tigard, OR 97223 ASHRA.MA BRAHMAPREMANANDA. HARRY SCHAFFER&E Lillian M KENNETH BROYI.ES&A 7ennie 11515 SW Hall Blvd 11245 SW 9oTh Ave 11260 SW 90Th Ave Tigazd,OR 97223 Tigazd, OR 97223 Tigard,OR 97223 ROBERT&ROSE HEINTZ BRENT MCTAGGART STEPI-�N FREEDMAN&Candace Arch 11275 SW 90Th Ave PO Box 231207 11300 SW 90Th Ave Tigard, OR 97223 Tigard, OR 97281 Tigard,OR 97223 BII.LY JACOBY&J Valerie ALICIA&RICHt1RD VICE MARTIN NiARIA JLJNG 11325 SW 90Th Ave 11375 SW 90Th Ave 11400 SW 90Th Ave Tigard, OR 97223 Tigard,OR 97223 Tigard,OR 97223 NANCY&RONALD HEITZ �; MAT'1'HEW FORI�IAN&A Kathleen C KENT 8c LISA POWLOSKI 11401 SW 90Th Ave 11403 SW 90Th Ave 11405 SVJ 90Th Ave Tigazd, OR 97223 Tigazd, OR 97223 Tigard,OR 97223 I-�AROLD WORSECH&K Sandra WII.LIAM&STEPfIANIE SNYDER THOMAS&DORIS DOLL 11450 SW 90Th Ave 11480 SW 90Th Ave 11500 SW 90Th Ave Tigard,OR 97223 Tigard, OR 97223 Tigazd, OR 97223 BEHROOZ&SHEII,A ANSARI DEANNA MARIE QUII..LEN ALAN&SOOK HEE BAXTER 11540 SW 90Th Ave 11560 SW 90Th Ave 11650 SW 90Th Ave Tigard,OR 97223 Tigard, OR 97223 Tigard, OR 97223 DOREEN GRIGG T / BONN�&NORMAN ALANDER DON GRAHAM&Paul Brossia 11700 SW 90Th Ave Y PO Box 2619 11260 SW Hall Blvd Tigard,OR 97223 White City, OR 97503 Tigard, OR 97223 MARGARET ANN BROWN PAUL BROSSIA&Don Graham LN PROPERTIES LLC 19065 SW Johnson St 300 �Th St 11�75 SW Hall Blvd Beaverton, OR 97006 Lake Oswego, OR 97034 Tigard, OR 97223 A , � . � . L N PROPERTIES LLC KINDER-CARE LEARNING CNTRS INC KEIICO PANG 12725 SW 66Th Ave Estate Tar Real �6--�-�2 Hololio St Portland, OR 97223 1777 NE Loop�10 #1250 Kaneohe, HI 9674=� San Antonio,TX 78217 GERALD &JOAN CACH ANNA SAYLER MII.TON BROWN 12525 SW Main St PO Box 23757 2106 SE Ochoco St Tigard,OR 97223 Tigard, OR 9'1281 Milwaukie, OR 97222 RAY BARNETT&Mabel Amos SHAWN ROBERTS ELEANOR SCHI,AGER&Diana Ashbur PO Box 230025 11635 SW Hall Blvd#8 11635 SW Hall Blvd#1 Tigard, OR 97231 Tigard, OR 97223 Tigard, OR 97223 CHARLES MENDEL&J Winifred ROBBIN KAY HALL SOLIS JACINTO IJLUAN&Mae Rachell 11635 SW Hall Blvd#5 11635 SW Hall Blvd#3 11635 SW Hall Blvd#10 Tigard, OR 97223 Tigard, OR 97223 Tigard, OR 97223 CORRINE NtELIUS&Cathv Lee Price STEVEN PHIl.LIPS JO[-W PAUL LAWSON JR. 11635 SW Hall Blvd#14 11635 SW Hall Blvd#11 11635 SW Hall Blvd#15 Tigazd, OR 97223 Tigard, OR 97223 Tigard. OR 97223 ROLAND CHRISTENSEN RAY HA.ROLD BARNETT&Mabei Amos SAI�fANTHA WRIGHT-VOSIK.A 11635 SW Hall Btvd#17 PO Box 230U25 Brvon Keith Johnson Tigard, OR 97223 Tigard, OR 97281 1163� SW Hall Blvd#18 Tigazd, OR 97223 KAREN MEEHAN NANCY STEELE GARY BRADFORD 11635 SW Hall Blvd#9 11660 SW Hall Blvd 305 E �Th St Tigard, OR 97223 Tigard, OR 97223 The Dalies, OR 970�8 SEAN&NSTINE VIRMG DONALD IVAN&MARY LOOFBOURO ELIZABETH COSHOW Ove&Den Arvidson 11410 SW Lomita Ave 11=125 SW Lomita Ave 11405 SW Lomita Ave Portland, OR 97223 Tigard, OR 97223 Tigard, OR 97223 RICHARD MURRAY&Lowana CL�'FORD&CYNTHIA BERGER LINDA BOUSE&John Bouse 11�40 SW Lomita Ave 11�15� SW Lomita Ave 11�170 SW Lomita Ave Tigard, OR 97223 Tigard, OR 97223 Tigard, OR 97223 JEFFREY HUGI-�S&Jo Bare Tami MARTHA HOCKETT APPLETON PROPERTIES INC l I=485 SW Lomita Ave 11�02 SW Lomita Ave 710U SW Hampton St #lU3 T'igard, OEt 97223 Tigard,OR 97223 Tigard, OR 97223 TOIvIIvtY E-IENRY NEBERT&E Susan DAVID & BETTY FITZPATRICK ANDREW I-�RBERHOLZ&L Florence 11530 SW Lomita Ave 7G1� SW Chestnut St 9620 SW 9UTh Ave Tigazd, OR 97223 Tigard, OR 97223 Portland,OR 97223 LARRY I�RBERHOLZ TIlvIOTHY MCLOUGHLIN&K Yvonne PING-J[JI KAI WANG 9620 SW 90Th Ave Sd00 SW 1981fi Ave 22600 SW 93Rd Ter Portland,OR 97223 Aloha, OR 97007 Tualatin, OR 97062 JEROI�PARKER FERN MACKINNON&Virginia Dale ]ANG&YON SOON OH 5320 SW Macadam Ave 11625 SW Lomita Ave 11630 SW Lomita Ave Portland,OR 97201 Tigard,OR 97223 Tigard, QR 97223 DAVID &MARINA STARLING TIGARD PROPERTIES INC DAVID EMAMI 32 Independence Ave 2106 SE Ochoco St 3380 Barrington Dr Lake Grove, OR 97035 Milwaukie, OR 97222 West Linn, OR 97068 DONALD SCHAEFFER&Michael Munch PO Bos 82549 Portland, OR 97282 � .� ' -; --� — . AFFIDAVIT OF MAILING CITYOF�TIOARD (;omin u mty,vevelopment S(rapingA BetterCommunity S7A�o�o�,�GoN ) County of`iNasFiington )ss. City of 7igard ) I, ShirCey L. 7reat, being first duly sworn/affirm, on oath depose and say that I am an Administrative SpeciaCist I for the �ity ofTrgar�f, 'Washington County, Oregon and that I served the following: (Check Appiopnale 6oa(s)Below) ❑ NOTICE OF: PENDING APPLICATION FOR:I (TypelKind of Notice) (File No./Name Reference) (t4-Day Comment Penod) ❑ Ciry of Tigard Planning Director ❑ NOTICE Of DECISION fOR:�i O AMENDED NOTICE (File NolName Re%rence) O City of Tigard Planning Director � NoTICE oF RESCHEDULED PUBLIC HEARING FOR: � SWAMI VISWA TEMPLE fJ(PANSION[CUPI 1999-00001 � AMENDED NOTICE (File No.lName Reference) (Date of Pubhc Hearing) p City of Tigard Planning Director ❑ Tigard Hearings Officer ❑ Tigard Planning Commission � Tigard City Council ❑ NOTICE OF FINAL ORDER FOR: � � ❑ AMENDED NOTICE (File NoJName Reference) (Date ot Pudic Hearing) ❑ City of Tigard Planning Director p Tigard Hearings Officer ❑ Tigard Planning Commission ❑ Tigard City Council A copy of the PUBLIC HEARIN6 NOTICE/NOTICE OF DECISION/NOTICE OF fINAI ORDER/OTHER NOTICE[Sl of which is attached, marked Exhlblt "A", was mailed to each named person(s) at the address(s) shown on the attached list(s), marked EIIhlblt"B",on the 5th day of Nouember ,1999, and deposited in the United States Mail on the 5th day of November , 1999, postage prepaid. � ' � �� (Person that Prepared Notice) Subscribed and sworn/affirmed before me on.the � �� day of ��N�0. �--/ , Zu�u �'' , ' ��.� NOTARY PUBLIC OF ORE60N OF�IC.IAL SEI1L SHERMAN S.CASPER My Commission Expires: U3 NOTARY PU�t.lC-OAEGON CpM�115S10N N0.323409 MY COMMISSION F�(Ptl�S MAY 13,2003 N.OTICE TO MORTGAGEE, LIENH�R,VENDOR OR SELLER: . ,��Hl,�1' A THE 1�IGARD UEVELOPMENT CODE REQUIRES IF YOU RECEIVE THIS NOTICE, IT SHALL BE PROMPTLY FORWARDED TO THE PURCHASER. CITY OF TIGARD Commur:ity lrJez�eCopmerit HOTICE OF "RESCHEDULED" s��`��"��°"""u„``� PUBLIC HEARIHG NOTICE IS HEREBY GIVEN THAT THE NOVEMBER 22, 1999 PLANNING fOMMISSION MEETING HAS BEE►v RESCHEDULED TO MONDAY, DECEMBER 6, 1999 AT 7:30 PM IN THE TOWN HALL, OF THE TIGARD CIVIC CENTER, 13125 SW HALL BOULEVARD, TIGARD, OREGON 97223 TO CONSIDER THE FOLLOWING APPLICATION: FILE NO(S).: CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT[CUPI 1999-00001 PLANNED DEVELOPMENT REVIEW[PDR)1999-00002 VARIANCE NAR]1999-00024 SETBACK AUIUSTMENT[MISI 1999-00026 FILE TITLE: SWAMI VISWA TEMPLE ExPANSION APPLICANT/ PLANNING OWNER: Swami Viswa Premananda CONSULTANT: Alpha Engineering 11515 SW Hall Boulevard Mike Miller, Project Manager Tigard, OR 97223 Plaza West, Suite 230 9600 SW Oak Street Portland, OR 97223 REQUEST: The applicant has requested Conditional Use Approval to expand the existing Ashram (temple). The applicant is also requesting Planned Development approval to allow the residential use of finro bedrooms for the residents and eight guestrooms. A variance has been requested to the access width. An adjustment to the front yard setback for a religious facility has also been requested. LOCATION: The site is located at 11515 SW Hall Boulevard. The properties are also identified as WCTM 1 S135DA, Tax Lots 1400 and 3503. ZONE: C-P; Professional Commercial. APPLICABLE REVIEW CRITERIA: Community Development Code Chapters 18.330, 18.370, 18.390, 18.510, 18.530, 18.705, 18.745, 18.765, 18.775, 18.790, 18.795 and 18.810. THE PUBLIC HEARING ON THIS MATTER WILL BE CONDUCTED IN ACCORDANCE WITH THE RULES OF CHAPTER 18.390 OF THE COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT CODE AND RULES OF PROCEDURE ADOPTED BY THE TIGARD PLANNING COMMISSION AND CITY COUNCIL AND AVAILABLE AT CITY HALL. ASSISTIVE LISTENING DEVICES ARE AVAILABLE FOR PERSONS WITH IMPAIRED HEARING. THE CITY WILL ALSO ENDEAVOR TO ARRANGE FOR QUALIFIED SIGN LANGUAGE INTERPRETERS AND QUALIFIED BILINGUAL INTERPRETERS UPON REQUEST. PLEASE CALL (503) 639-4171, EXT. 320 (VOICE) OR (503) 684-2772 (TDD - TELECOMMUNICATIONS DEVICES FOR THE DEAF) NO LESS THAN ONE WEEK PRIOR TO THE HEARING TO MAKE ARRANGEMENTS. CUP1999-00001/SWAMI VISWA TEMPLE EXPANSION "RESCHEDULED PUBLIC HEARING DATE" NOTICE OF 12/6/99 PLANNING COMMISSION PUBLIC HEARING ANYONE WISHING TO PRESENT V'�TEN TESTIMONY ON THIS PROPO�ACTION MAY DO SO IN WRITING PHIOR T�O OR AT THE PUBLIC HEA G. ORAL TESTIMONY MAY BE PRE.. _ ED AT THE PUBLIC HEARING. AT THE PUBLIC HEARING, THE PLANNING COMMISSION WILL RECEIVE A STAFF REPORT PRESENTATION FROM THE CITY PLANNER, OPEN THE PUBLIC HEARING, AND INVITE BOTH ORAL AND WRITTEN TESTIMONY. THE PLANNING COMMISSION MAY CONTINUE THE PUBLIC HEARING TO ANOTHER MEETING TO OBTAIN ADDITIONAL INFORMATION OR CLOSE THE PUBLIC HEARING AND TAKE ACTION ON THE APPLICATION. IF A PERSON SUBMITS EVIDENCE OR DOCUMENTS LESS THAN 7 DAYS PRIOR TO THE PUBLIC HEARING DATE, THE HEARINGS AUTHORITY MAY ALLOW A CONTINUANCE OF THE HEARING, SUBJECT TO ORS 215.428 OR 227.178. IF THERE IS NO CONTINUANCE GRANTED AT THE HEARING, ANY PARTICIPANT IN THE HEARING MAY REQUEST THAT THE RECORD REMAIN OPEN FOR AT LEAST SEVEN (7) DAYS AFTER THE HEARING. A REQUEST THAT THE RECORD REMAIN OPEN CAN BE MADE NLY AT THE FIRST EVIDENTIARY HEARING (ORS 197.763(6). INCLUDED IN THIS NOTICE IS A LIST OF APPROVAL CRITERIA APPLICABLE TO THE REQUEST FROM THE TIGARD COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT CODE AND THE TIGARD COMPREHENSIVE PLAN. APPROVAL OR DISAPPROVAL OF THE REQUEST BY THE PLANNING COMMISSION WILL BE BASED UPON THE CRITERIA LISTED OR OTHER CRITERIA IN THE COMPREHENSIVE PLAN OR DEVELOPMENT CODE WHICH THE PERSON BELIEVES TO APPLY TO THE DECISION. AT THE HEARING IT IS IMPORTANT THAT COMMENTS RELATING TO THE REQUEST PERTAIN SPECIFICALLY TO THE APPLICABLE CRITERIA IN THE COMPREHENSIVE PLAN OR THE DEVELOPMENT CODE. FAILURE TO RAISE AN ISSUE IN PERSON OR BY LETTER AT SOME POINT PRIOR TO THE CLOSE OF THE HEARING ON THE REQUEST, ACCOMPANIED BY STATEMENTS OR EVIDENCE SUFFICIENT TO ALLOW THE HEARINGS AUTHORITY AND ALL PARTIES TO RESPOND PRECLUDES AN APPEAL, AND FAILURE TO SPECIFY THE CRITERION FROM THE COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT CODE OR COMPREHENSIVE PLAN AT WHICH A COMMENT IS DIRECTED PRECLUDES AN APPEAL TO THE LAND USE BOARD OF APPEALS BASED ON THAT ISSUE. ALL DOCUMENTS AND APPLICABLE CRITERIA IN THE ABOVE-NOTED FILE ARE AVAILABLE FOR INSPECTION AT NO COST OR COPIES CAN BE OBTAINED FOR TWENTY-FIVE CENTS (25t) PER PAGE, OR THE CURRENT RATE CHARGED FOR COPIES AT THE TIME OF THE REQUEST. AT LEAST SEVEN (7) DAYS PRIOR TO THE HEARING, A COPY OF THE STAFF REPORT WILL BE AVAILABLE FOR INSPECTION AT NO COST, OR A COPY CAN BE OBTAINED FOR TWENTY-FIVE CENTS (25�) PER PAGE, OR THE CURRENT RATE CHARGED FOR COPIES AT THE TIME OF THE REQUEST. FOR FURTHER INFORMATION PLEASE CONTACT THE STAFF PLANNER lulia Powell Haiduk AT (503)639-4171, TIGARD CITY HALL, 13125 SW HALL BOULEVARD, TIGARD, OREGON 97223. SL �,.........�....,�...,.. ,�_ VICINITY MAP y�r — - - ------------ -- - -- �� \`I �� CUP I 999-00001 _._ --' PDR 1999-00002 ' _. _ i \ —-- � - - _ - VARI999-00024 �T _ __ - i MIS1999-00026 N - � I � _ W i SWAMI YISWA=== - - ° - TEMPLE EXPANSION � N_ .__ � � ` � --� -- -� --- 25UBJECT .. - .- a Iu . TAX LOTS � � � �� . ---- _�- L , �� . � - w � � � _. . . ¢ ��—� . . . \ � -� -- -. Q� _ \_, . �.,< . ._ _. . _ . � N� o_... .. . . m w I I ♦ `�� LOMITA . . —�---- - � �� \ N �/�� - �� ;�/� ^��\� '� _ — �r� .�� ' � r� \ � �--_.—__ � \� ,, � 9\/ / y\\/ � Zl"\ C�ryofTgYrd Q �� —_ �1 I `��\P - w s..w.n..,�, < . ' . . 'O✓ � ��. .,,ae>.,, �.. . . „u.��a >.� CUP1999-�0001/SWAMI VISWATEMPLE EXPANSION "RESCHEDULED PUBLIC HEARING DATE" NOTICE OF 12/6/99 PLANNING COMMISSION PUBLIC HEARING EX�I��'� B 1 S 135DA-00500 1 S 135DA-01000 GRAHAM DON G AND SCHAEFFER DONALD M 11260 SW HALL BLVD PO BOX 82549 TIGARD,OR 97223 PORTLAND,OR 97282 1S135DA-01100 1 5DA-01200 SCHAEFFER DONALD M SCHA ONALD M PO BOX 23697 PO 23 TIGARD,OR 97281 GARD,OR 97 1 1 S 135DA-01300 1 S 135DA-01400 HOLMES SAMUEL M/JANET M BRAHMA PREMANANDA ASHRAM 12215 SW 33R0 AVE 11515 SW HALL BLVD PORTLAND,OR 97219 TIGARD,OR 97223 1S135DA-01401 1S135DA-01500 KINDER-CARE LEARNING CNTRS INC LN PROPERTIES LLC 1777 NE LOaP 410#1250 11475 SW HALL BLVD SAN ANTONIO,TX 78217 TIGARD,OR 97223 1 S135DA-01600 5DA-01700 BRAZIL CLARENCE E&MARY JEAN BRAZIL NCE E 8 MARY JEAN PO BOX 23064 PO 230 TIGARD,OR 97281 ARD,OR 972 � 1S135DA-01800 1S135DA-01801 NEDELISKY MICHAEL J L N PROPERTIES LLC 25 82ND DR 11481 SW HALL BLVD STE 100 GLADSTONE,OR 97027 TIGARD,OR 97223 1S135DA-01900 1S135DA-02000 BROWN MARGARET ANN OBIE MEDIA CORP 19065 SW JOHNSON AVE 4211 W 11TH ALOHA,OR 97006 EUGENE,OR 97402 1S135DA-02100 �,/� 1S135DA-02700 MA P�RET ANN STARLING DAVID W&MARINA A 1906 NSON AVE 32 INDEPENDENT AVE HA,OR 970 LAKE GROVE,OR 97035 1 S 135DA-02701 1 S 135DA-02702 BROYLES M KENNETH NESS HAROLD W DORIS A 11264 SW 90TH 11230 SW 90TH TIGARD,OR 97223 TIGARD,OR 97223 1S135DA-02801 1S135DA-02802 MCTAGGART BRENT FREEDMAN STEPHEN H& PO BOX 231207 11300 5W 90TH AVE TIGARD,OR 97281 TIGARD,OR 97223 1 S 135DA-02803 1 S 135DA-02900 FRE EPHEN H 8 JUNG MARTIN MARIA 1130 H AVE 11400 SW 90TH ARD,OR 97 TIGARD,OR 97223 1 S 135DA-03000 1 S 135DA-03100 VIRNIG SEAN&JUSTINE SNYDER WILLIAM T&STEPHANIE 11405 SW LOMITA AVE 11480 SW 90TH TIGARD,OR 97223 TIGARD,OR 97223 1 S 135DA-03200 1 S 135DA-0330a DOLL THOMAS C AND DORIS M ANSARI BEHROOZ&SHEILA 11500 SW 90TH 11540 SW 90TH AVE TIGARD,OR 97223 TIGARD,OR 97223 1 S 35DA-03500 1 S 135DA-03503 L N P S LLC BRAHMAPREMANANDA ASHRAMA 11481 LL BLVD 5TE 100 11515 SW HALL BLVD TI RD,OR 9 3 TIGARD,OR 97223 1S135DA-03800 1S135DA-04200 KAULUWAI CORPORATION GHITA VASILE&DOMNICA 2445-A MAKIKI HEIGHTS DRIVE 11310 SW 90TH AVE HONOLULU,HI 96822 TIGARD,OR 97223 1 S 135DA-04300 15135D6-00400 SMITH SHARON LOU HOFFMAN MICHAEL J 11330 SW 90TH 1223 NW 24TH#5 TIGARD,OR 97223 PORTLAND,OR 97210 1 S 135D8-00500 1 S 135DB-00600 WHITE PAUL UBARBARA A JACKSON LINDA J 11495 SW 90TH AVE 11545 SW 90TH AVE TIGARD,OR 97223 TIGARD,OR 97223 1 S135D8-02600 1 S135DB-02602 POWLOSKI C KENT&LISA FAULK JEFF&DOROHTY M 11405 SW 90TH 11435 SW 90TH TIGARD,OR 97223 TIGARD,OR 97223 1 S 135DB-02603 1 S 135DB-02604 FORMAN MATTHEW B& HEITZ NANCY P AND RONALD L 11403 SW 90TH AVE 11401 SW 90TH TIGARD,OR 97223 TIGARD,OR 97223 1 S 135DB-12000 1 S 135DC-07900 VICE ALICIA K&RICHARD A BELL LEO LAMAR TRUSTEE 11375 SW 90TH AVE 11635 SW 90TH TIGARD,OR 97223 TIGARD,OR 97223 1S135DG08100 1S135DC-08200 HANSEN JOYCE I MOLITOR LAWRENCE R/NANCY L 11565 SW 90TH AVE 11587 SW 90TH AVE TIGARD,OR 97223 TIGARD,OR 97223 1 S 135DD-00100 1 S 135DD-01201 CHRISTIE LACEY TRUSTEE MAINS ELDON H JR AND 22020 SW AEBISHER RD PO BOX 1178 SHERWOOD,OR 97140 HILLSBORO,OR 97123 1 S 135DD-01300 1 S 135DD-01400 STEELE NANCY TRUSTEE SAYLER ANNA R 11660 SW HALL BLVD PO BOX 23757 TIGARD,OR 97223 TIGARD,OR 97281 1S135DD-01600 1S135DD-01601 CACH GERALD C AND JOAN L HOLMES SAMUEL M/JANET M 12525 SW MAIN 12215 SW 33RD AVE TIGARD,OR 97223 PORTLAND,OR 97219 1 S 135DD-0180a 1 S 135DD-02000 PANG KEIKO TR BRO MIL O 46-442 HOLOLIO ST 2106 OCO ST KANEOHE,HI 96744 AUKIE,O 7222 1 S 135DD-02001 1 S 135DD-02100 BROWN MILTON O TIGARD PROPERTIES INC 2106 SE OCHOCO ST 2106 SE OCHOCO ST MILWAUKIE,OR 97222 MILWAUKIE,OR 97222 1S135DD-03300 1 DD-03301 PARKER JEROME W TRUSTEE TIGAR RTIES INC 5320 SW MACADAM AVE 210 OC C�,O ST PORTLAND,OR 97201 LWAUKIE,OR 97222 1 S 1350D-03600 1 S 135DD-03602 BERGMANN FLOYD H WORSECH HAROLD A 11600 SW 90TH 11450 5W 90TH TIGARD,OR 97223 TIGARD,OR 97223 1 S 135DD-03603 1 S 135DD-03604 COSHOW ELIZABETH I BERGER CLIFFORD W&CYNTHIA A 11425 SW LOMITA AVE 11455 SW LOMITA AVENUE TIGARD,OR 97223 TIGARD,OR 97223 1 S 135DD-03605 1 S 135DD-03606 HUGHES JEFFREY M&TAMI JO BARE APPLETON PROPERTIES INC 11485 SW LOMITA AVE 7100 SW HAMPTON STE 103 TIGARD,OR 97223 TIGARD,OR 97223 1S135DD-03607 1S135DD-03608 FITZPATRICK DAVID G&BETTY L HERBERHOLZ ANDREW B&FLORENCE 7615 SW CHESTNUT STREET 9620 SW 90TH TIGARD,OR 97223 PORTLAND,OR 97223 1 S 135DD-03609 1 S 135DD-03611 MACKINNON FERN E 8 MCLOUGHLIN TIMOTHY R AND 11625 SW LOMITA 5400 SW 198TH AVE TIGARD,OR 97223 ALOHA,OR 97007 1 S 135DD-03612 1 S 135DD-03613 HERBERHOLZ ANDREW B NEBERT TOMMY HENRY 9620 SW 90TH 11530 SW LOMITA PORTLAND,OR 97223 TIGARD,OR 97223 1 S 135DD-03614 15135DD-03615 HOCKETT MARTHA M BOUSE LINDA C 11502 SW LOMITA AVE 11470 SW LOMITA TIGARD,OR 97223 TIGARD,OR 97223 1S135DD-03616 1S135DD-03617 MURRAY RICHARD D LOOFBOUROW DONALD IVAN&MARY P 11440 SW LOMITA 11410 SW LOMITA AVE TIGARD,OR 97223 PORTLAND,OR 97223 1 S 135DD-03618 1 S 135DD-03619 BRADFORD GARY TR QUILLEN DEANNA MARIE 305 E FIFTH 11560 SW 90TH THE DALLES,OR 97058 TIGARD,OR 97223 1S135DD-03620 1S135DD-03700 WANG PING-JUI KAI OH JANG W AND YON SOON 22600 SW 93RD TER 11630 SW LOMITA TUALATIN,OR 97062 TIGARD,OR 97223 1S135DD-03701 1S135DD-03703 GRIGG DOREEN E PARKER JEROME W TRUSTEE 11700 SW 90TH AVE 5320 SW MACADAM AVE TIGARD,OR 97223 PORTLAND,OR 97201 1 S135DD-03704 1 S 135DD-03800 BAXTER ALAN T AND SOOK HEE BAUER LENA RICHARD T 11650 SW 90TH 11734 SW 90TH TIGARD,OR 97223 TIGARD,OR 97223 1S135DD-04400 1S135DD-05200 STEVENSON MICHAEL J&KAY L PATEL ASHOK A 8 2825 DELLWOOD DR 14850 NE SANDY LAKE OSWEGO,OR 97034 PORTLAND,OR 97230 • , . 1S136CC-00301 1S136CC-00400 ANOREWS MANAGEMENT LIMITED MCGUIRE ROBERT J& 11336 SW BULL MOUNTAIN RD#103 8470 SW PFAFFLE ST TIGARD,OR 97224 TIGARD,OR 97223 ALPHA ENGINEERING MIKE MILLER, PRQTECT MANAGER PLAZA WEST, SUITE 230 9600 SW OAK STREET PORTLAND OR 97223 AFFIDAVIT OF MAILING CITVOFTIGARD Community,DeveCopmer:t S(wpingA Bettes�ommunity S7A2�o�o�,�GoN ) �'ounty of�Nashington )ss. ctty of�-�a�d � I, SFiirCey L. 7reat, being first duly sworn/affirm, on oath depose and say that I am an Ad'ministrative SpeciaCut I for the �ity of 7�igard, 4Nashington County, Oregon and that I served the following: {c.nea�nv�oo��e aoxe5�ee�� ❑ NOTICE OF: PENDING APPLICATION FOR:I (Type/Kind ot NoUCe) (File No.IName Re(erence) (14Day Comment Penod) ❑ City of Tigard Planning Director ❑ NOTICE Of �ECISION fOR:�i O AMENDED NOTICE (File NoJName Reference) ❑ City of Tigard Planning Director ❑ NOTICE OF RESCHEDULED PUBLIC HEARING FOR: ;^� CUP1999-00001/PDA1999-00002/ VAR1999-00024/MIS1999-00026 SWAMI YISWA PRENANANDA TEMPLE ADDITION 12/6/99 � AMENDED NOTICE (F�le No/Name Reference) (Date of PubGC Heanng) ❑ City of Tigard Planning Director p Tigard Hearings Officer p Tigard Planning Commission 0 Tigard City Council ❑ NOTICE OF FINAL ORDER FOR: � I O AMENDED NOTICE {File NoJName Reference) , (oate of Puaic Heanng) p City of Tigard Planning Director p Tigard Hearings Officer ❑ Tigard Planning Commission ❑ Tigard City Council A copy of the PUBLIC HEARIN6 NOTICE/NOTICE OF DECISION/NOTICE OF FINAL ORDER/OTHER NOTICE[S) of which is attached, marked El(hlblt "A", was mailed to each named person(s) at the address(s) shown on the attached list(s), marked E1(hlblt"B", on the 15'" day of November ,1999, and deposited in the United States Mail on the 15'" day of Nouember , 1999, postage prepaid. � r � (P rson that Prepared Notice) � Subscribed and sworn/affirmed before me on the � day of �ANuA�r/. 2nOd , 19 OTARY PUBLIC OF ORE60N o�cuu,s�n� SHERMAN g,CAgpER My Commission Expires:,�✓l��/�, ZC�I� NOTARY PUBUC-0RECiON � h1Y COIbIMISSION�D(f�RES MAY 13�2003 NaTICE TO MORTGAGEE, LIENHC�R,VENDOR OR SELLER: � ITHSHALL BE PROM�MFORWARDED 0 TRHE�CHASER�CEIVE THIS NOTICE, ��H 1 •� CITY OF TIGARD Community�DeveCopment NOTICE OF "RESCHEDULED" S��A�tte�Community PUBLIC HEARIHG NOTICE IS HEREBY GIVEN THAT THE NOVEMBER 22. 1999 PLANNING COMMISSION MEETING HAS BEE►v RESCHEDULED TO MONDAY, DECEMBER 6, 1999 AT 7:30 PM IN THE TOWN HALL, OF THE TIGARD CIVIC CENTER, 13125 SW HALL BOULEVARD, TIGARD, OREGON 97223 TO CONSIDER THE FOLLOWING APPLICATION: FILE NO(S).: CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT[CUPI 1999-00001 PLANNED DEVELOPMENT REVIEW[PDRI 1999-00002 VARIANCE NARI 1999-00024 SETBACK ADIUSTMENT[MIS)1999-00026 FILE TITLE: SWAMI VISWA TEMPLE EI(PANSION APPLICANT/ PLANNING OWNER: Swami Viswa Premananda CONSULTANT: Alpha Engineering 11515 SW Hall Boulevard Mike Miller, Project Manager Tigard, OR 97223 Plaza West, Suite 230 9600 SW Oak Street Portland, OR 97223 REQUEST: The applicant has requested Conditional Use Approval to expand the existing Ashram (temple). The applicant is also requesting Planned Development approval to allow the residential use of two bedrooms for the residents and eight guestrooms. A variance has been requested to the access width. An adjustment to the front yard setback for a religious facility has also been requested. LOCATION: The site is located at 11515 SW Hall Boulevard. The properties are also identified as WCTM 1 S135DA, Tax Lots 1400 and 3503. ZONE: C-P; Professional Commercial. APPLICABLE REVIEW CRITERIA: Community Development Code Chapters 18.330, 18.370, 18.390, 18.510, 18.530, 18.705, 18.745, 18.765, 18.775, 18.790, 18.795 and 18.810. THE PUBLIC HEARING ON THIS MATTER WILL BE CONDUCTED IN ACCORDANCE WITH THE RULES OF CHAPTER 18.390 OF THE COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT CODE AND RULES OF PROCEDURE ADOPTED BY THE TIGARD PLANNING COMMISSION AND CITY COUNCIL AND AVAILABLE AT CITY HALL. ASSISTIVE LISTENING DEVICES ARE AVAILABLE FOR PERSONS WITH IMPAIRED HEARING. THE CITY WILL ALSO ENDEAVOR TO ARRANGE FOR QUALIFIED SIGN LANGUAGE INTERPRETERS AND QUALIFIED BILINGUAL INTERPRETERS UPON REQUEST. PLEASE CALL (503) 639�171, EXT. 320 (VOICE} OR (503) 684-2772 (TDD - TELECOMMUNICATIONS DEVICES FOR THE DEAF) NO LESS THAN ONE WEEK PRIOR TO THE HEARING TO MAKE ARRANGEMENTS. CUP1999-00001/SWAMI VISWA TEMPLE EXPANSION "RESCHEDULED PUBLIC HEARING DATE' NOTICE OF 12/6/99 PLANNING COMMISSION PUBLIC HEARING ANYONE WISHING TO PRESENT �EN TESTIMONY ON THIS PROP�ACTION MAY DO SO IN WR171NG PRIOR TO OR AT THE PUBLIC HEA .G. ORAL TESTIMONY MAY BE PRE ED AT THE PUBLIC HEARING. AT THE PUBLIC HEARING, THE PLANNING COMMISSION WILL RECEIVE A STAFF REPORT PRESENTATION FROM THE CITY PLANNER, OPEN THE PUBLIC HEARING, AND INVITE BOTH ORAL AND WRITTEN TESTIMONY. THE PLANNING COMMISSION MAY CONTINUE THE PUBLIC HEARING TO ANOTHER MEETING TO OBTAIN ADDITIONAL INFORMATION OR CLOSE THE PUBLIC HEARING AND TAKE ACTION ON THE APPLICATION. IF A PERSON SUBMITS EVIDENCE OR DOCUMENTS LESS THAN 7 DAYS PRIOR TO THE PUBLIC HEARING DATE, THE HEARINGS AUTHORITY MAY ALLOW A CONTINUANCE OF THE HEARING, SUBJECT TO ORS 215.428 OR 227.178. IF THERE IS NO CONTINUANCE GRANTED AT THE HEARING, ANY PARTICIPANT IN THE HEARING MAY REQUEST THAT THE RECORD REMAIN OPEN FOR AT LEAST SEVEN (7) DAYS AFTER THE HEARING. A REQUEST THAT THE RECORD REMAIN OPEN CAN BE MADE ONLY AT THE FIRST EVIDENTIARY HEARING (ORS 197.763(6). INCLUDED IN THIS NOTICE IS A LIST OF APPROVAL CRITERIA APPLICABLE TO THE REQUEST FROM THE TIGARD COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT CODE AND THE TIGARD COMPREHENSIVE PLAN. APPROVAL OR DISAPPROVAL OF THE REQUEST BY THE PLANNING COMMISSION WILL BE BASED UPON THE CRITERIA LISTED OR OTHER CRITERIA IN THE COMPREHENSIVE PLAN OR DEVELOPMENT CODE WHICH THE PERSON BELIEVES TO APPLY TO THE DECISION. AT THE HEARING IT IS IMPORTANT THAT COMMENTS RELATING TO THE REQUEST PERTAIN SPECIFICALLY TO THE APPLICABLE CRITERIA IN THE COMPREHENSIVE PLAN OR THE DEVELOPMENT CODE. FAILURE TO RAISE AN ISSUE IN PERSON OR BY LETTER AT SOME POINT PRIOR TO THE CLOSE OF THE HEARING ON.THE REQUEST, ACCOMPANIED BY STATEMENTS OR EVIDENCE SUFFICIENT TO ALLOW THE HEARINGS AUTHORITY AND ALL PARTIES TO RESPOND PRECLUDES AN APPEAL, AND FAILURE TO SPECIFY THE CRITERION FROM THE COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT CODE OR COMPREHENSIVE PLAN AT WHICH A COMMENT IS DIRECTED PRECLUDES AN APPEAL TO THE LAND USE BOARD OF APPEALS BASED ON THAT ISSUE. ALL DOCUMENTS AND APPLICABLE CRITERIA IN THE ABOVE-NOTED FILE ARE AVAILABLE FOR INSPECTION AT NO COST OR COPIES CAN BE OBTAINED FOR TWENTY-FIVE CENTS (25�) PER PAGE, OR THE CURRENT RATE CHARGED FOR COPIES AT THE TIME OF THE REQUEST. AT LEAST SEVEN (7) DAYS PRIOR TO THE HEARING, A COPY OF THE STAFF REPORT WILL BE AVAILABLE FOR INSPECTION AT NO COST, OR A COPY CAN BE OBTAINED FOR TWENTY-FIVE CENTS (25G) PER PAGE, OR THE CURRENT RATE CHARGED FOR COPIES AT THE TIME OF THE REQUEST. FOR FURTHER INFORMATION PLEASE CONTACT THE STAFF PLANNER lulia Powell Naiduk AT (503)639-4171, TIGARD CITY HALL, 13125 SW HALL BOULEVARD, TIGARD, OREGON 97223. I �.. , yiyy � r -J— � ;_-- It I VICI_NITY—MAP lil �-,�� I CUP1999-00001 '' __ -_ � PDR1999-00002 I , _ I� _ � VAR1999-OQ024 � ST �T - � ��II -MIS1999-00026 ��.-�� m �, ___________ ' N�1 � -� SWAMI VISWA 'o, ° � l TEMPLE EXPANSION � —i I �—. �% \ I I 2 SUBJECT , � TAX LOTS —� _ �; y ,. .r-� FLE a--— /.— ��_� - ' . � _ � - � �� \\\��. - � �---�w�—.. � ��A w �\\�\; I �,� � -� Q� ��:` � ,� x ��--- !� P- I � � , � �--� ��rn i i °' ,--� ��.� � � N � : ��__�-� LOMITA , � \ r I �� i 7� � J ' -� .� \ � I�—` � r � %� _ � � ' i � !� � ��`� — � _ � �' ' , — � I I yF� ' Ciryo�d —Q Q,� ` < Pa ,. .o..� i ° � � � � �� `C � V� I _�� _ '_w� � -- _ _�� I Me,..«.e�.A_„ � CUP1999-00001/SWAMI VISWA TEMPLE EXPANSION "RESCHEDULED PUBLIC HEARING DATE" NOTICE OF 12/6/99 PLANNING COMMISSION PUBLIC HEARING — - �\ -�.y--- -- — — — — , � - - . \\T �J� - . GEOGPAPMiG �NFORMPTrpu•5v5iEM \�. �� NOTIFICATION ' . ' , � - AREA MAP ST � 15175WOi70! ..�..� �M08800 � i � �- - ----� �S OO�� ._ .U �. ' ; - - �-. W;�----.._ , , .(`') - - ,�.. _.._. . .___. ..i1S1350�02700�.� . 15/75MOt100 r' � .�, 131750�OP01 �.. ..,.� . . . ........ � � . � ..___ ._.___.. . . . 15175M�0500 � -- . - , � � � � � � � � � 1S1i50�0l80�: -_---_... � � � � � � � � � �� --� .____ __ . .�TSSM02SW �' --- - � �157350�042�0 .. . '. . I \ > �,��oo �__ _�_ _- _ ' ; CU P I 999-00001 W — u,asan:su, �s,��e,aoo ;��___ i_ ' —' �s,�soe,:eooQ ,s,35o�o:a.: PFAFFLE S D R I 9 9 9"O O O O� ��>� . . . .... . .- -..- . 1SY25M075B0 '. . . �5o�onoa r-- � Q ��soso:sa is�ssonuieoa usono�eoi �se�oi000 I 1S1i50D00818 � �„5°B°��' VAR I 999-00024 1f785DB9t800 157350A00000 � - � �� 'iSiiBCCOM89 � SUBJEC �sias000ae tstaso�ormo �a�sso�uisoo �ssoeossot �yas000asoi -- S�TE , � _ ��5�� u58.a,s�� M I S I 9 9 9—0 0 0 2 6 i ffiias000as � � iS1750B00900 � iSig50R0810015/750007604 . . ...... . . '.,'15136CC00701 , .LL.J ......... -. _-_._ - ...—..- . 1513500078 15175W01500 � � � � � � � � . . � ...ffi175U003605 � � � � � � � � � � , . \ Q 181i5BA00500 1573501103Y00 � 151350007 � ��` „ � � /� , ... . ._. � 1S1i5Mf1�00 � �3suuoasqy,si�soou ��Sa8U01 �` -- SWAMI VISWA u��5oeooeoa iS175�103300 >�' ��s�� ui - \ ,�,as000�6� � T E M P L E � ___ _ -__ . __ uias�oaei: H �osocoe�uus000aeis _.__. � uusocoetaa o - �as000aeos .- p� 157350�Oi6il ni�soomeoo iavsooeieao � , .. . iSYJ50007600 _.._. . � . ,��8,9,s,35�o=e:a � E X PA N S I O N LOMITA " m3sooeou�� j m�seeo�eoo ui�s000aaoo tsuseooto� ��sseoauoa \ � .. , �/ � m�s000aioa � �sias000tooi� � � -�siasoamaao�'"�� u�asueo��oa uias000alos I = - uias000szaa- , is�s000a�ai I u�as000noo,�`��ys000i2oi �'` � � _ ! �---- i j � �osaaeaeoo 1 � _ �'��y /� isias000aaoo '� �� W w I (n� � � > � tst3s�oaa3ai � _ Q, Q � �` � �I,� y I � � '' �� o zoo eoo Aoo � 1 \ ' � � 1"=473 feet �� _— --- 0 �� ,� �� \ �5�� 1� � _ , � � � ' � °�°�� city of�Ticard !�`�� Informalion on this map is for general location ony and GV \ should be verified with the Develoqnent Services Division. t �� 13725 SW Hal�Blvd , � Tigard,OR 97223 , , � ; ., , . �, , - � (503)639-4171 ' � V /. . � �/ <i � � ._---. --. �-- �'�.� '� � http:llwww.ci.li ard.or.us _, � _ i_. _�._ Y � - — 9 -- � ` _. _ �__ , , - _ — __ _ — - Community Development Plot date: Nov 5, 1999;C:lmagic\MAGIC03.APR � �xKrB��r g 1S135DA-00500 1S135DA-01000 GRAHAM DON G AND SCHAEFFER DONALD M 11260 SW HALL BLVD PO BOX 82549 TIGARD,OR 97223 PORTLAND,OR 97282 1 S 135DA-01100 1 5DA-01200 SCHAEFFER DONALD M SCHA ONALD M PO BOX 23697 PO 23 ,, TIGARD,OR 97281 GARD,OR 97� 1 S 135DA-01300 1 S 135DA-01400 HOLMES SAMUEL M/JANET M BRAHMA PREMANANDA ASHRAM 12215 SW 33RD AVE 11515 SW HALL BLVD PORTLAND,OR 97219 TIGARD,OR 97223 1S135DA-01401 15135DA-01500 KINDER-CARE LEARNING CNTRS INC LN PROPERTIES LLC 1777 NE LOOP 410#1250 11475 SW HALL BLVD SAN ANTONIO,TX 78217 TIGARD,OR 97223 1 S 135DA-01600 5DA-01700 BRAZIL CLARENCE E&MARY JEAN BRAZIL NCE E&MARY JEAN PO BOX 23064 PO 230 TIGARD,OR 97281 ARD,OR 972 1S135DA-01800 1S135DA-01801 NEDELISKY MICHAEL J L N PROPERTIES LLC 25 82ND DR 11481 SW HALL BLVD STE 1�0 GLADSTONE,OR 97027 TIGARD,OR 97223 1S135DA-01900 1S135DA-02000 BROWN MARGARET ANN OBIE MEDIA CORP 19065 SW JOHNSON AVE 4211 W 11TH ALOHA,OR 97006 EUGENE,OR 97402 1S135DA-02100 � 1S135DA-02700 � MA ET ANN STARLING DAVID W&MARINA A 1906 NSON AVE 32 INDEPENDENT AVE HA,OR 970 LAKE GROVE,OR 97035 1S135DA-02701 1S135DA-02702 BROYLES M KENNETH NESS HAROLD W DORIS A 11260 SW 90TH 11230 SW 90TH TIGARD,OR 97223 TIGARD,OR 97223 1S135DA-02801 1S1350A-02802 MCTAGGART BRENT FREEDMAN STEPHEN H& PO BOX 231207 11300 SW 90TH AVE TIGARD,OR 97281 TIGARD,OR 97223 1S135DA-02803 � 1S135DA-02900 FRE EPHEN H& JUNG MARTIN MARIA 1130 H AVE 11400 SW 90TH T ARD,OR 97 TIGARD,OR 97223 1S135DA-03000 1S135DA-03100 VIRNIG SEAN&JUSTINE SNYDER WILLIAM T&STEPHANIE 11405 SW LOMITA AVE 11480 SW 90TH TIGARD,OR 97223 TIGARD,OR 97223 1S135DA-03200 1S135DA-03300 DOLL THOMAS C AND DORIS M ANSARI BEHROOZ&SHEILA 11500 SW 90TH 11540 SW 90TH AVE TIGARD,OR 97223 TIGARD,OR 97223 i S 35DA-03500 . ''� 1 S135DA-03503 L N P S LLC BRAHMAPREMANANDA ASHRAMA 11481 LL BLVD STE 100 11515 SW HALL BLVD TI RD,OR 9 3 TIGARD,OR 97223 1S135DA-03800 1S135DA-04200 KAULUWAI CORPORATION GHITA VASILE&DOMNICA 2445-A MAKIKI HEIGHTS DRIVE 11310 SW 90TH AVE HONOLULU,HI 96822 TIGARD,OR 97223 1S135DA-04300 1S135D8-00400 SMITH SHARON LOU HOFFMAN MICHAEL J 11330 SW 90TH 1223 NW 24TH#5 TIGARD,OR 97223 PORTLAND,OR 97210 1S135D6-00500 1S135DB-0060a WHITE PAUL UBARBARA A JACKSON LINDA J 11495 SW 90TH AVE 11545 SW 90TH AVE TIGARD,OR 97223 TIGARD,OR 97223 1 S 135D8-02600 1 S 135D6-02602 POWLOSKI C KENT&LISA FAULK JEFF&DOROHTY M 11405 SW 90TH 11435 5W 90TH TIGARD,OR 97223 TIGARD,OR 97223 1S135DB-02603 1S135DB-02604 FORMAN MATTHEW B& HEITZ NANCY P AND RONALD L 11403 SW 90TH AVE 11401 SW 90TH TIGARD,OR 97223 TIGARD,OR 97223 1S135DB-12000 1S135DC-07900 VICE ALICIA K&RICHARD A BELL LEO LAMAR TRUSTEE 11375 SW 90TH AVE 11635 SW 90TH TIGARD,OR 97223 TIGARD,OR 97223 1S135DC-08100 1S135DC-08200 HANSEN JOYCE I MOLITOR LAWRENCE R/NANCY L 11565 SW 90TH AVE 11587 SW 90TH AVE TIGARD,OR 97223 TIGARD,OR 97223 1 S135DD-00100 1 S135DD-01201 CHRISTIE LACEY TRUSTEE MAINS ELDON H JR AND 22020 SW AEBISHER RD PO BOX 1178 SHERWOOD,OR 97140 HILLSBORO,OR 97123 1S135DD-01300 1S135DD-01400 STEELE NANCY TRUSTEE SAYLER ANNA R 11660 SW HALL BLVD PO BOX 23757 TIGARD,OR 97223 TIGARD,OR 97281 1 S 135DD-016�0 1 S 135DD-01601 CACH GERALD C AND JOAN L HOLMES SAMUEL M/JANET M 12525 SW MAIN 12215 SW 33RD AVE TIGARD,OR 97223 PORTLAND,OR 97219 1 S135DD-01800 1 S135DD-02000 PANG KEIKO TR BRO MIL O 46-442 HOLOLIO ST 2106 OCO ST KANEOHE,HI 96744 AUKIE,O 7222 1S135DD-02001 1S135DD-02100 BROWN MILTON O TIGARD PROPERTIES INC 2106 SE OCHOCO ST 2106 SE OCHOCO ST MILWAUKIE,OR 97222 MILWAUKIE,OR 97222 1S135DD-03300 1 DD-03301 PARKER JEROME W TRUSTEE TIGAR RTIES INC 5320 SW MACADAM AVE 21D OC O ST PORTLAND,OR 97201 LWAUKIE,OR 97222 1 S 135DD-03600 1 S 135DD-03602 BERGMANN FLOYD H WORSECH HAROLD A 11600 SW 9DTH 11450 SW 90TH TIGARD,OR 97223 TIGARD,OR 97223 1 S 135DD-03603 1 S 135DD-03604 COSHOW ELIZABETH I BERGER CLIFFORD W&CYNTHIA A 11425 SW LOMITA AVE 11455 SW LOMITA AVENUE TIGARD,OR 97223 TIGARD,OR 97223 1S135DD-03605 1S135DD-03606 HUGHES JEFFREY M 8 TAMI JO BARE APPLETON PROPERTIES INC 11485 SW LOMITA AVE 71�0 SW HAMPTON 5TE 1�3 TIGARD,OR 97223 TIGARD,OR 97223 1 S 135DD-03607 1 S 135DD-03608 FITZPATRICK DAVID G&BETTY L HERBERHOLZ ANDREW B&FLORENCE 7615 SW CHESTNUT STREET 9620 SW 90TH TIGARD,OR 97223 PORTLAND,OR 97223 1 S 135DD-03609 1 S 135DD-03611 MACKINNON FERN E& MCLOUGHLIN TIMOTHY R AND 11625 SW LOMITA 5400 SW 198TH AVE TIGARD,OR 97223 ALOHA,OR 97007 1 S 135DD-03612 1 S 135DD-03613 HERBERHOLZ ANDREW B NEBERT TOMMY HENRY 9620 SW 90TH 11530 SW LOMITA PORTLAND,OR 97223 TIGARD,OR 97223 1 S 135DD-03614 1 S 135DD-03615 HOCKETT MARTHA M BOUSE LINDA C 11502 SW LOMITA AVE 11470 SW LOMITA TIGARD,OR 97223 TIGARD,OR 97223 1 S 135DD-03616 1 S 135DD-03617 MURRAY RICHARD D LOOFBOUROW DONALD IVAN&MARY P 11440 SW LOMITA 11410 SW LOMITA AVE TIGARD,OR 97223 PORTLAND,OR 97223 1 S 135DD-03618 1 S 135DD-03619 BRADFORD GARY TR QUILLEN DEANNA MARIE 305 E FIFTH 11560 SW 90TH THE DALLES,OR 97058 TIGARD,OR 97223 1 S 135DD-03620 1 S 135DD-03700 WANG PING-JUI KAI OH JANG W AND YON SOON 22600 SW 93RD TER 11630 SW LOMITA TUALATIN,OR 97062 TIGARD,OR 97223 1 S 135DD-03701 1 S 135DD-03703 GRIGG DOREEN E PARKER JEROME W TRUSTEE 11700 SW 90TH AVE 5320 SW MACADAM AVE TIGARD,OR 97223 PORTLAND,OR 97201 1 S135DD-03704 1 S135DD-03800 BAXTER ALAN T AND SOOK HEE BAUER LENA RICHARD T 11650 SW 90TH 11734 SW 90TH TIGARD,OR 97223 TIGARD,OR 97223 1 S135DD-04400 1 S135DD-05200 STEVENSON MICHAEL J&KAY L PATEL ASHOK A& 2825 DELLWOOD DR 14850 NE SANDY LAKE OSWEGO,OR 97034 PORTLAND,OR 97230 1 S 136CC-00301 1 S 136CC-00400 ANOREWS MANAGEMENT LIMITED MCGUIRE ROBERT J& 11336 SW BUIL MOUNTAIN RD#103 8470 SW PFAFFLE ST TIGARD,OR 97224 TIGARD,OR 97223 AFFIDAVIT OF MAILING CITYOFTIOARD �omrnuniry DeveCoprrrent Shaping s`i Better Community .S7.�LZ�E�F�,�G�C ) County of 4Nashington )ss. City of 7agard ) I, Patricia L.Lunsfvr� being first duly sworn/affirm, on oath depose and say that I am an �dminirtrative Special`ut II for the C`ity of Tagard, 4Nashington County,Oregon and that I served the following: (Check Appropriate Box(s)6elowE NOTICE OF PENDING LAHD USE APPLICATION FOR: AMENDED NOTICE (File No./Name Reference) City of Tigard Planning Director NOTICE Of DECISION fOR: AMENDED NOTICE (File No.Mame Reference) City of Tigard Planning Director NOTICE OF PUBLIC HEARING FOR: � � AMENDED NOTICE (File No.Mame Reference) (Date of Pub�ic Hearinp) City of Tigard Planning Director Tigard Hearings Officer Tigard Planning Commission Tigard City Council ❑x NOTICE OF FINAL ORDER fOR:� fUP1999-00001/PDR1999-00002/VAR1999-00024/MIS1999-00026 SWAMI YISWA PREMANANDA TEMPLE ADDITION J 1216/99 AMENDED NOTICE (File No./Name Reference) (Date of Public Hearings) City of Tigard Planning Director Tigard Hearings Officer 0 Tigard Planning Commission Tigard City Council FOR: � I (File No.Mame Reference) (Date ot PuWic Heanng,if applicable) A copy of the PUBIIC NEARING NOTICE/NOTICE OF DECISION/NOTICE Of flNAI ORDER/OTHER NOTICE[S] of which is attached, marked Exhlblt "A", was mailed to each named person(s) at the address(s) shown on the attached list(s), marked Exhlblt' " on the 13�day of December,�999, a d deposited in the United States Mail on the 13"'day of December,1999, postage repaid. .T � / / (✓ � t a OfIC fJ'U Subscribed and sworn/affirmed before me on the� day of , . OFFlG�I.sE/�L �� ° �'/ � DIANE M JELDERKS NOT1IRY PUBI,IC.pqEppp �nr coMM°ss o s�,�s��,,� My Commission Ex i �xHr!��T � , _ , , . 120 DAYS = 1/12/2000 CITY OF TIGARD Community Deve�opment Skaping r`i Better Community CITY OF TIGARD `Washington County, Oregon NOTICE OF FINAL ORDER N0. 99-03PC BY THE PLANNING COMMISSION Case Number(s): CUP1999-00001/PDR1999-00002NAR1999-00024/MIS1999-00026 Case Name(s): SWAMI VISWA PREMANANDA TEMPLE ADDITION Name of Owner(s): Brahmapremananda Ashrama Name of Applicant: Swami Viswa Premananda . Address of Applicant: 11515 SW Hall Boulevard Address of Property: 11515 SW Hall Boulevard Tax Ma s /Lot No s .: 1 S135DA, Tax Lots 1400 and 3503 Request: ➢ ON DECEMBER 6, 1999, THE PLANNING COMMISSION APPROVED THE REQUEST FOR CONDITIONAL USE TO CONSTRUCT A TEMPLE AN EXISTING ASHRAM EMPL AD US MENT TO �THE FRONTTYARD SETE ACK FOREA REL$GIOUS FAOOMY� HA� PPROVED. THE REQUEST FOR A VARIANCE TO THE ACCESS W�6TR H , �ND CONCLUSIONS DESCRIBED IN FURTHER DETAIL WITHIN THIS FINAL ORDER. Zone: C-P; Professional Commercial. Action: ➢ ❑ Approval as Requested � Approval with Conditions ❑ Denial Notice: Notice was published in the newspaper, posted at City Hall and mailed to: � Owners of record within the required distance 0 Affected governmental agencies 0 The affected Citizen Involvement Team Facilitator � The applicant and owner(s) The adopted findings of fact, decision and statement of conditions can be obtained from the Tigard Planning Division/Community Development Department at Tigard City Hall. Final Decision: THIS DECISION IS FINAL ON DECEMBER 13, 1999 AND BECOMES EFFECTIVE ON DECEMBER 29, 1999 UNLESS AN APPEAL IS FILED. Appeal: The decision of the Review Authority is final for purposes of appeal on the date that it is mailed. Any party with standing as provided in Section 18.390.040.G.1. may appeal this decision in accordance with Section 18.390.040.G.2. of the Tigard Community Development Code which provides that a written appeal together with the required fee shall be filed with the Director within ten (10) business days of the date the not�ce of the decision was mailed. The appeal fee schedule and forms are available from the Planning Division of Tigard City Hall, 13125 SW Hall Boulevard, Tigard, Oregon 97223. THE DEADLINE FOR FILING AN APPEAL IS 3:30 PM ON DECEMBER 28, 1999. Questions: If you have any questions, please call the City of Tigard Planning Division at (503) 639-4171. � ' ' 120 DAYS = 1/12/2000 NOTICE OF FINAL ORDER N0. 99-03PC BY THE PLANNING COMMISSION CRYOFTIGARD Community DeveCopment FOR THE CITY OF TIGARD, OREGON SFiupiny�BetterC�mmunity A FINAL ORDER APPROVING A LAND USE APPLICATION FOR CONDITIONAL USE TO CONSTRUCT A TEMPLE AND PLANNED DEVELOPMENT FOR EXPANSION OF THE EXISTING ASHRAM (TEMPLE) TO ALLOW RESIDENTIAL USE OF TWO(2) BEDROOMS FOR THE RESIDENTS AND EIGHT(8)GUESTROOMS, AS WELL AS, AN ADJUSTMENT TO THE FRONT YARD SETBACK FOR A RELIGIOUS FACILITY. THE REQUEST FOR A VARIANCE TO THE ACCESS WIDTH HAS BEEN DENIED. THE COMMISSION HELD A PUBLIC HEARING TO RECEIVE TESTIMONY ON THIS APPLICATION ON DECEMBER 6, 1999. THE PLANNING COMMISSION HAS BASED THEIR DECISION ON THE FACTS, FINDINGS AND CONCLUSIONS DESCRIBED IN FURTHER DETAIL WITHIN THIS FINAL ORDER. SECTION I. APPLICATION SUMMARY SWAMI VISWA PREMANANDA TEMPLE ADDITION CASES: on itiona se ermit - Planned Development PDR 1999-00002 Variance VAR 1999-00024 Setback Adjustment MIS 1999-00026 APPLICANT/ Swami Viswa Premananda PLANNING Alpha Engineering OWNERS: 11515 SW Hall Boulevard CONSULTANT: Mike Miller, Project Mgr. Tigard, OR 97223 Plaza West, Suite 230 9600 SW Oak Street Portland, OR 97223 PROPOSAL: The applicant has requested Conditional Use Approval to construct a temple and Planned Development approval for expansion of the existing Ashram (temple) to allow residential use of two (2) bedrooms for the residents and eight (8) guestrooms. A Variance has been requested to the access width, as we(1 as an Adjustment to the front yard setback for a religious facility has been requested. LOCATION: The subject site is located at 11515 SW Hall Boulevard. The properties are also identified as WCTM 1 S135DA, Tax Lots 1400 and 3503. COMPREHENSIVE PLAN and ZONING DESIGNATION: C-P; Professional Commercial. APPLICABLE REVIEW CRITERIA: Community Development Code Chapters 18.330, 18.350, 18.370, 18.390, 18.510, 18.530, 18.705, 18.745, 18.765, 18.775, 18.790, 18.795 and 18.810. SECTION II. PLANNING COMMISSION'S DECISION The Planning Commission finds that the proposed development meets the applicable approval criteria of the Tigard Community Development Code and that the proposal will not adversely affect the health, safety and welfare of the City. The Planning Commission, therefore, APPROVES the requested Land Use Applications with the exception of the Variance, subject to the following recommended conditions of approval: SWAMI VISWA PREMANANDA TEMPLE ADDITION PAGE 1 OF 23 CUP1999-00001/PDR1999-00002NAR1999-00024/MIS1999-00026 PLANNING COMMISSION FINAL ORDER NO.99-03PC CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL � � THE FOLLOWING CONDITIONS SHALL BE SATISFIED PRIOR TO FINAL SITE INSPECTION: (Unless otherwise noted, the Staff contact shall be BRIAN RAGER, Engineering Department 503-639-4171.) THE FOLLOWING CONDITIONS SHALL BE SATISFIED PRIOR TO ISSUANCE OF THE SITE AND/OR BUILDING PERMITS: Planninq Conditions: - 1. Submit a detail of the bicycle rack. 2. Submit a revised plan that shows three (3 additional bicycle parking spaces will be provided. 3. Submit a revised plan that shows a clearly marked walkway across the access drive/parking lot connecting the existing sidewalk and the proposed sidewalk. 4. Submit a revised plan that shows the 5 proposed parking spaces deleted from the site plan OR the access drive must be widened to provide, at minimum, a 40-foot pavement width. The revised plan must show at least one (1) van accessible handicap space will be provided that includes a 9-foot-wide space with an 8-foot-wide aisle in front of the proposed development. 5. Submit a floor plan that shows the total area dedicated for living facilities (guestrooms and resident's rooms) will be less than 3,460 square feet. 6. Submit a lighting plan indicating the location and intensity of the lighting to be provided. The applicant shall submit details of the lighting plan indicating that the light will be directed away from residential properties. 7. Hours of operation shall be limited to prohibit worship services from being held before 6:00 PM, Mondays through Fridays with the exception of legal holidays. 8. Submit a revised plan the clearly states the site size, the amount of impervious surface and the amount of landscaped area on the subject site alone. 9. Submit a revised plan showing setback dimensions that scales accurately. Enqineerinq Conditions: 10. Prior to issuance of a site and/or building permit, the applicant shall pay an addressing fee in the amount of $30. 11. Additional right-of-way (ROW) shall be conveyed to the State of Oregon, by and through its Department of Transportation, Highway Division, along the frontage of SW Hall Boulevard to increase the right-of-way to 45 feet from centerline. The description shall be tied to the existing right-of-way centerline. Verification that the conveyance has been submitted to the State shall be provided to the City Engineering Department. (For additional information, contact Rick Reeves, Oregon Department of Transportation, right-of-way Section, 123 NW Flanders, Portland, OR 97209-4037; Phone: 731-8461). 12. The applicant's construction plans shal� indicate that they will provide an on-site water detention facility designed to meet Unified Sewerage Agency (USA) Design Standards. SWAMI VISWA PREMANANDA TEMPLE ADDITION PAGE 2 OF 23 CUP1999-00001/PDR1999-00002NAR1999-00024/MIS1999-00026 PLANNING COMMISSION FINAL ORDER NO.99-03PC � '13. ' The applicant shall provide an on-site water quality facility as required by Unified Sewerage Agency Design and Construction Standards (adopted by Resolution and Order No. 96-44). Final plans and calculations shall be submitted to the Engineering Department (Brian Rager) for review and approval prior to issuance of the building permit. In addition, a proposed maintenance plan shall be submitted along with the plans and calculations for review and approval. 14. The applicant shall either place the existing overhead utility lines along SW Hall Boulevard underground as a part of this project, or they shall pay the fee in-lieu of undergrounding. The fee shall be calculated by the frontage of the site that is parallel to the utility lines and will be $27.50 per lineal foot. If the fee option is chosen, the amount will be $880 and it shall be paid prior to issuance of a site and/or building permit. THE FOLLOWING CONDITIONS SHALL BE SATISFIED PRIOR TO A FINAL BUILDING INSPECTION: Enqineerinq Conditions: 15. To ensure compliance with Unified Sewerage Agency Design and Construction Standards, the applicant shall employ the design engineer responsible for the design and specifications of the private water quality facility to perform construction and visual observation of the water quality facility for compliance with the design and specifications. These inspections shall be made at significant stages, and at completion of the construction. Prior to final building inspection, the design engineer shall provide the City of Tigard (Inspection Supervisor) with written confirmation that the water quality facility is in compliance with the design and specifications. Staff Contact: Hap Watkins, Building Division. Planninq Condition: 16. Construct all improvements as shown on the approved plans. Any modifications to plans must be approved by the Planning Division PRIOR to the modification. FAILURE TO SATISFY THE CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL WITHIN 18 MONTHS OF THE EFFECTIVE DATE OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION'S DECISION SHALL RENDER THE PLANNING COMMISSION'S DECISION VOID. SECTION III. BACKGROUND INFORMATION Site Historv: Staff conducted a computer search for case history on the subject parcels. None of the parcels had previous land use applications on file. The site has a shared parking agreement with the office complex to the north (Hall Corporate Center). When this office was constructed (SDR97-00014NAR97-0008), parking spaces were constructed on the subject site as well and a variance was approved for access width to allow 117 parking spaces from one, 30-foot-wide access drive (97 from the shared parking for Hall Corporate Center and Ashram site and 20 from the daycare site). Vicinitv Information: The site is bordered north and east by properry zoned C-P and are currently developed with an office complex and a daycare center. The property to the south is zoned R-12 and developed with an apartment complex and the property to the west is zoned R-4.5 and developed with single-family residences. SWAMI VISWA PREMANANDA TEMPLE ADDITION PAGE 3 OF 23 CUP1999-00001/PDR1999-00002NAR1999-00024/MIS1999-00026 PLANNING COMMISSION FINAL ORDER NO.99-03PC Site Information and Proposal Description: � � The Site is currently developed with a residential house. The proposal is to continue to use the existing residence as an Ashram (residential dormitory for Monks) and expand it for a total of 4,840 square feet to allow for 2 full-time residents bedrooms and 8 guestrooms. The proposal also involves the construction of a 9,000 square foot temple. The applicant is requesting Variance approval to allow additional parking spaces to be constructed off of a driveway that is already not in conformance with the required dimensions. They are also requesting an Adjustment to the front yard setback for a religious facility. SECTIDN IV. DECISION MAKING PROCEDURES, PERMITS AND USE: Use Classification: Section 18.130.020 is s t e se a egories. The applicant is proposing to build a Temple (Religious Institution) and Ashram (Residential Dormitory Use�. The Religious Institution is a Conditional Use in the C-P zone and the residential use �s not allowed unless it is part of a planned development. Summa Land Use Permits: Chapter 18.310 e ines e ecision-ma ing type to which the land-use application is assigned. The adjustment to the front yard setback is a Type I administrative decision. The Variance is a Ty�e II administrative decision. The proposed use (Religious Institution) requires a Conditional Use permit which is a Type Ifl-HO decision. The requested living facilities (residential use) requires a planned development which is a Type III-PC decision. When applications are heard concurrently, the highest review authority hears all applications, therefore, all aspects of this application will be reviewed by the Planning Commission. Decision Makin Procedures: Chapter 18.390 escri es e ecision-ma ing procedures. Type III-PC procedures apply to quasi-judicial permits and actions that predominantly contain discretionary approval criteria. Type III-PC actions are decided by the Planning Commission with appeals to or review by the City Council. SECTION V. NEIGHBORHDOD COMMENTS No comments were received from surrounding property owners. SECTION VI. SUMMARY OF APPLICABLE CRITERIA A summary of the applicable criteria in this case in the Chapter order in which they are addressed in this report are as follows: A. S ecific Conditional Use Criteria enera pp rova riteria Additional Conditions of Approval) B. lanned Develo ment Standards rocess Specific Planned Development Criteria C. A licable Develo ment Code Standards . ariances an �us men s 18.705 (Access, Egress & Circulation) 18.745 Landscaping and Screening) 18.765 Off-Street Parking and Loading Requirements) 18.790 Tree Removal) 18.795 (Visual Clearance) 18.810 (Street and Utility Improvement Standards) D. Additional Planned Development Criteria SWAMI VISWA PREMANANDA TEMPLE ADDITION PAGE 4 OF 23 CUP1999-00001/PDR1999-00002NAR1999-00024/MIS1999-00026 PLANNING COMMISSION FINAL ORDER NO.99-03PC SECTION VII. APPLICABLE REVIEW CRITERIA AND FINDINGS Impact Study: Section 18.390.040.B.2.e states that the applicant shall provide an impact study to quantify the effect of development on public facilities and services. For each public facility system and type of impact, the study shall propose improvements necessary to meet City standards, and to minimize the impact of the development on the public at large, public facilities systems, and affected private property users. In situations where the Community Development Code requires the dedication of real propertX interests, the applicant shall either s peci#ically concur with a requirement for public right-of-way dedication, or provide evidence that supports that the real pro erty dedication is not roughly proportional to the projected impacts of the developmen� Any required street improvements to certain collector or higher volume streets and the Washington County Trafific Impact Fee (TIF) are mitigation measures that are required at the time of development. Based on a transportation impact study prepared by Mr. David Larson for the A-Boy Expansion/Dolan II/Resolution 95-61, TIF's are expected to recapture 32 percent of the traffic impact of new development on the Collector and Arterial Street system. ' The applicant is being required to dedicate right-of-way to allow an ultimate right-of-way width of 45 feet (approximately 20 feet of right-of-way). The Engineering Department has estimated the right-of-way acquisition to be approximately $3 per square foot. It is estimated, therefore, that the value of land being dedicated is $1,920. Upon completion of this development, the applicant will be required to pay TIF's of approximately $12,461. Based on the estimate that total TIF fees cover 32 percent of the impact on ma�or street improvements citywide, a fee that would cover 100 percent of this prolects traffic impact is $38,940 ($j 2,461 divided by .32). The difference between the TfF paid and the full impact, is considered an unmitigated impact. Since the TIF paid is $12,461, the unmitigated impact can be valued at $26,479. Given the estimated cost of the half-street improvement and the unmitigated impact, the dedication requirement meets the rough proportionality test related to the impact of the development. A. SPECIFIC CONDITIONAL USE APPROVAL CRITERIA Section 18.330.010.A states that the purpose of this chapter is to provide standards and procedures under which a conditional use may be permitted, enlarged or altered if the site is appropriate and if other appropriate conditions of approval can be met. There are certain uses which due to the nature of the impacts on surrounding land uses and public facilities require a case-by-case review and analysis. Section 18.330.020.A states that a request for approval for a new conditional use shall be processed as a Type III-HO procedure, as regulated by Chapter 18.390.050, using ap roval criteria contained in Section 18.330.030A and subject to other requirements in �hapter 18.330. The applicable review criteria in this case include the following chapters of the Community Development Code: 18.330, Conditional Use; 18.350, Planned Development; 18.370, Variances and AdJ'ustments; 18.390 Decision Making Procedures;18.520, Commercial Zoning Districts, 18.530, 18.705, Access, Egress and Circulation; 18.745, Landscaping and Screening; 18.765, Off-Street Parkin , 18.790, Tree Removal; 18.795, Visual Clearance Areas; and 18.810, Street and Utili�jr Improvement Standards. The development standards and requirements of these chapters are addressed below. The proposal contains no elements related to the provisions of the following chapters: 18.600, Community Plan Area Standards; 18.710, Accessory Residential Units; 18.715, Density Computations; 18.720, Design Compatibility Standards; 18.725, Environmental Performance Standards; 18.730, Exceptions to Development Standard; 18.740, Historic Overlay; 18.742, Home Occupations; 18.750, Manufactured/Mobile Home Regulations; 18.760, Nonconforming Situations; 18.775, Sensitive Lands; 18.780, Temporary Uses; 18.797, Water Resources Overlay District; and 18.798, Wireless Communications Facilities. These chapters are, therefore, found to be inapplicable as approval standards. SWAMI VISWA PREMANANDA TEMPLE ADDITION PAGE 5 OF 23 CUP1999-00001/PDR1999-00002NAR1999-00024/MI51999-00026 PLANNING COMMISSION FINAL ORDER NO.99-03PC General Approval Criteria for a Conditional Use: Section 18.330.030: � � � The site size and dimensions provide adequate area for the needs of the proposed use; The existing site size is 2.25 acres. This report evaluates the proposal and necessary setbacks, landscaping, etc. and as conditioned, the site size is adequate for the needs of the proposed expansion. The characteristics of the site are suitable for the proposed use considering size, shape, location, topography, and natural features; The site is relatively flat. There are trees on the site, but the development has been situated in such a way as to preserve the existing trees. All required public facilities have adequate capacity to serve the proposal; and All public facilities including streets, storm and sanitary sewers, and water have adequate capacity to serve the site as discussed in detail elsewhere in this report. The applicable requirements of the zoning district are met except as modified by this chapter. The following table provides the dimensional standards in the C-P zone, the additional dimensional requirements and approval standards for Religious Institutions specified The Conditional Use Standards Section 18.330.050.B.16 and the dimensions proposed for this development. STANDARD C-P CONDITIONAL USE PROPOSED REQUIREMENT Minimum Lot Size 6,00a sq.ft. 20,000 sq.ft 104,301 sq.ft Minimum Lot Width 50 ft. SAME AS C-P 190'approx.[3J Minimum Setbacks O ft. 25 ft 20 ft."' - Front yard - Side facing street on corner&through lots --- 20 ft N/A - Side yard 0/20 ft[1]. 20 k 20 ft"' - Rear yard - Side of rear yard abutting more restrictive zoning district 0/20 ft[1]. 20 ft 55 ft"' - Distance between property line and garage entrance Maximum Height 45 ft. SAME AS C-P 23 ft.approx.[3] Maximum Site Coverage[2] 85% SAME AS C-P 36% approx.(3] Minimum Landscape Requirement 15% SAME AS C-P 64% approx.[3J [1] No setback shall be required except 20 feet shall be required where the zone abuts a residential zoning district [2] Includes all buildings and impervious surfaces. [3] Approximate figures are provided where the applicanYs information is not clear or accuracy is questioned. In these instances, more discussion and detail is provided further in this report. `"" Dimensions specified on plans. Upon scaling, however,distances appear to be less. This Is discussed in more detail further in this report. As identified in the table above, the applicant's plans show that the dimensional standards for the base zone are met. The applicant is requesting an adjustment to the front yard setback dimensions required in the Conditional Use standards. This is discussed further in this report. The applicant's plans do not provide enough clear information for staff to state exactly what the dimensions are because the applicant has included dimensions for the SWAMI VISWA PREMANANDA TEMPLE ADDITION PAGE 6 OF 23 CUP1999-00001/PDR1999-00002NAR1999-00024/MIS1999-00026 PLANNING COMMISSION FINAL ORDER NO.99-03PC � office 'park to the north, however, the difference between the approximate amount and the required amount is so great that staff feels confident the standards are met. A condition of approval should be imposed, however, that requires the applicant to submit detailed information on the size of the site (in square feet), the impervious surface on the site and the landscaped area for the site. In addition, the setback dimensions are also in question because they do not scale off to the dimensions shown. The supplementary requirements set forth in other chapter of this Code including but not limited to Chapter 18.780, Signs, and Chapter 18.360, Site Development Review, if applicable, are met. Other applicable standards of the development code are discussed later in this report. The use will comply with the applicable policies of the Comprehensive Plan. The Comprehensive Plan is implemented by the Community Development Code. Compliance with Comprehensive Plan policies are, therefore, assured by satisfaction of the applicable development standards of the development code as addressed within this report. FINDING: Based on the analysis above, staff can not make a final determination that the General Approval Criteria for a Conditional Use are satisfied. If the applicant complies with the following conditions, staff can find that the standards are met or will be addressed further in this report and conditioned if necessary. CONDITIONS: • Submit a revised plan the clearly states the site size, the amount of impervious surface and the amount of landscaped area on the subject site alone. . Submit a revised plan showing setback dimensions that scales accurately. Additional Conditions of Approval for Conditional Use. Section 18.330.030.6 states that the Hearings Authority may impose conditions on the approval of a conditional use, which are found nece�sary to ensure the use is compatible with other uses in the vicinity, and that the impact of the proposed use on the surrounding uses and public facilities is minimized. These conditions may include, but are not limited to the following: Limiting the hours, days, place and/or manner of operation; Due to the nature of the use, it is anticipated that the majority of activity will take place on the weekends. However, given that the use shares an access and parking with an office complex, it is recommended to limit the hours of worship to after 6:00 PM Mondays through Fridays with the exception of legal holidays. It is acknowledged that some activities associated with a religious institution may take place during the workweek, however, it is � important that formal worship services be scheduled with consideration of surrounding uses, and traffic and parking demands. Requiring design features which minimize environmental impacts such as noise, vibration, air pollution, glare, odor and/or dust; There will be no noise, vibration, air pollution, glare, odor and/or dust associated with this use above and beyond what is found in an office type use which is permitted in the underlying zone. In any event, the applicant has proposed buffering and screening between the adjacent residential uses. Requiring additional setback areas, lot area, and/or lot depth or width; Staff feels the existing buffer requirements, as discussed further in this report, are adequate. SWAMI VISWA PREMANANDA TEMPLE ADDITION PAGE 7 OF 23 . CUP1999-00001/PDR1999-00002NAR1999-00024/MIS1999-00026 PLANNING COMMISSION FINAL ORDER NO.99-03PC Limiting the building height, size or lot coverage, and/or location on the site; Based on the plans submitted, the structures will comply with the height requirements and lot coverage requirements. The location is in accordance with the setbacks, provided the adjustment request is approved. Because of this, staff does not feel an additional condition is necessary. Designating the size, number, location and/or design of vehicle access points; Staff does not feel a condition is necessary for this criteria since, as discussed further in this report, vehicle access is already limited. Requiring street right-of-way to be dedicated and street(s) to be improved; The applicant has approximately 32 feet of frontage on SW Hall Boulevard. The right-of-way is not to the required width of 45 feet from centerline, therefore, the applicant will be required to dedicate additional right-of-way. This is discussed further under Street Utility and Improvement Standards. Requiring landscaping, screening, drainage and/or surfacing of_parking and loading areas; The majority of parking is existing. The applicant has proposed to construct 5 additional parking spaces, however, the buildings will be located between any new parking and the adjacent residential areas. The ability to provide additional parking is discussed in detail under the Variance discussion section. Limiting the number, size, location, height and/or lighting of signs; Signs have not been indicated as proposed, however, compliance with the sign requirements for the underlying zone should be sufficient in the event that signs are desired. Limiting or setting standards for the location and/or intensity of outdoor lighting; The applicant has not provided a lighting plan. Because of this, a condition is warranted requiring the applicant to submit a lighting plan indicating the location and intensity of the lighting to be provided. The applicant will be required to submit details of the lighting plan indicating that the light will be directed away from residential properties. Requiring berms, screening or landscaping and the establishment of standards for their installation and maintenance; Buffering and screening is discussed further in this report. Because the use proposed is no more intensive than other uses permitted in this zone, staff does not feel that additional screening, above and beyond what is already required, is necessary. Requiring and designating the size, height, location and/or materials for fences; No fences are proposed. Requiring the protection and preservation of existing trees, soils, vegetation, watercourses, habitat areas and/or drainage areas; No trees will be removed as a result of this proposal and there are no watercourses, habitat areas or drainage areas on the site. Requiring the dedication of sufficient open land area for a greenway adjoining and within the floodplain when land form alterations and development are allowed within the 100-year floodplain; and SWAMI VISWA PREMANANDA TEMPLE ADDITION PAGE 8 OF 23 CUP1999-00001/PDR1999-00002NAR1999-00024/MIS1999-00026 PLANNING COMMISSION FINAL ORDER NO.99-03PC � • , . This development is not adjacent to the 100-year floodplain, therefore, a condition is not necessary. Requiring the construction of a pedestrian/bicycle pathway within the floodplain in accordance with the adopted pedestr�an/bicycle pathway plan. This development is not adjacent to the 100-year floodplain, therefore, a condition is not necessary. FINDING: Based on the analysis above, staff finds the following conditions are warranted by this Conditional Use approval. All other conditions listed are not necessary or will be addressed elsewhere in this report. CONDITIONS: . Submit a lighting plan indicating the location and intensity of the lighting to be �rovided. The applicant shall submit details of the lighting plan indicating that he light will be directed away from residential properties. . Hours of operation shall be limited to prohibit worship services from being held before 6:00 PM, Mondays through Fridays with the exception of legal holidays. B. PLANNED DEVELOPMENT APPROVAL CRITERIA Planned Development (18.350): �h�e�$� a ows t e option for an applicant to create a more efficient, economically viable development that preserves natural land features while implementin9 the land use designation set forth for the property though the . Comprehensive Plan. Section 18.350.020.6 states that the Planned Development Review is a three (3)-step process, as follows: 1. The approval of the planned development overlay zone; 2. The approval of the planned development concept plan; and 3. The approval of the Detailed Development Plan. The applicant has requested that this application be for Planned Development Overlay Designation, Conceptual Planned Development and Detailed Planned Development approval to comply with all three steps in the PD process. FINDING: Because this proposal requested all three steps and this report evaluates the proposal for compliance with all standards required to be evaluated, this standard has been met. Allowed Uses: ec ion . .060.6 states that in all commercial zones, an applicant with a planned development approval may develop the site to contain all of the uses permitted outright in the underlying zone and, in addition, a maximum of 25% of the total gross floor area may be used for multi-family dwellings in those commercial zones that do not list multi-family dwellings as an outright use. The total square footage for all structures will be 13,840 square feet, therefore, only 3,460 square feet is permitted to be used for living areas. The floor plan shown for the Ashram has several areas dedicated for worship, yoga and other group facilities. The applicant has not provided enough detail for staff to confirm that the total living area (guestrooms) will be less than 3,460 square feet. SWAMI VISWA PREMANANDA TEMPLE ADDITION PAGE 9 OF 23 CUP1999-00001/PDR1999-00002NAR1999-00024/MIS1999-00026 PLANNING COMMISSION FINAL ORDER NO.99-03PC FINDING: Because the applicant has not provided enough detail for staff to confi'rm that � the total living area (guest rooms} will be less than 3,460 square feet, this standard has not been met. If the applicant submits a floor plan that shows the total area dedicated for living facilities (guest rooms and resident's rooms) will be less than 3,460 square feet, this standard will be met. CONDITION:Submit a floor plan that shows the total area dedicated for living facilities (guest rooms and resident's rooms) will be less than 3,460 square feet. Specific Planned Development Approval Criteria. The Commission shall make findings that the following criteria are satisfied when approving or approving with conditions, the concept plan. The Commission shall make findings that the criteria are not satisfied when denying an application. All the provisions of the land division provisions, Chapters 18.410, 18.420 and 18.430, shall be met; This proposal does not involve a division of land, therefore, this standard does not apply. Except as noted, the provisions of the following chapters shall be utilized as guidelines. A planned development need not meet these requirements where a development plan provides alternative designs and methods, if acceptable to the Commission, that promote the purpose of this section. In each case, the applicant must provide findings to justify the modification of the standards in the chapters listed in Subsection 3 below. The developer may choose to provide or the commission may require additional open space dedication and/or provision of additional amenities, landscaping or tree planting. Chapter 18.730, Exceptions to Development Standards; Chapter 18.795, Visual Clearance Areas; Chapter 18.745, Landscaping and Screening; Chapter 18.765, Off-street Parking and Loading Requirements; Chapter 18.705, Access, Egress and Circulation; and Chapter 18.780, Signs. Compliance with this standard is discussed, and conditioned as necessary in the following section: APPLICABLE DEVELOPMENT CODE STANDARDS. C. APPLICABLE DEVELOPMENT CODE STANDARDS Variances and Adiustments (18.370) Variance to the access width: The Director may approve, approve with conditions, or deny a request for an adjustment from the access requirements contained in Chapter 18.705, based on the following criteria: It is not possible to share access; The applicant has requested Variance approval to allow the construction of 5 additional parking spaces to take access off of an existing 30-foot-wide driveway that serves over 100 vehicles. The Code requires that when more than 99 parking spaces are provided, two, 30-foot-wide access drives or one, 50-foot-wide access drive must be provided. When the adjacent office complex (Hall Corporate Center) was constructed, a Variance was approved to the access width. Parking spaces were constructed on the subject site and a joint parking agreement signed to share parking between this site and the Hall Corporate Center with that previous approval. At that time, the property to the north was owned by a separate individual. The property to the north of the access drive is now owned by owners of the Hall Corporate Center. The applicant has indicated that it is not possible to share an access because the property owner to the north has not agreed to allow additional land to be dedicated for the additional access width. Staff does not agree with this because the Hall Corporate Center has recently submitted an application to construct a parking lot on the property to the north of the access drive. While their proposal does not involve increasing the access width, staff has informed them that a variance will not be approved and additional SWAMI VISWA PREMANANDA TEMPLE ADDITION PAGE 10 OF 23 CUP1999-00001/PDR1999-00002NAR1999-00024/MIS1999-00026 PLANNING COMMISSION FINAL ORDER NO.99-03PC ' p�rking spaces will not be permitted unless the required width is provided. Because the property to the north will be required to provide the additional access width in order to develop their parking lot, staff can not state that this request does not need to comply with the same standards. There are no other alternative access points on the street in question or from another street; Because all the surrounding property is developed, there are no alternative access points to the site. The access separation requirements cannot be met; This standard does not apply because the requested variance does not involve access separation. The request is the minimum adjustment required to provide adequate access; The applicant has access to parking via existing spaces on-site and the shared parking with the Hall Corporate Center. The existing parking is sufficient to serve the proposed use, therefore, adding 5 additional parking spaces is not necessary. The approved access or access approved with conditions will result in a safe access; and Staff does not feel that allowing additional parking spaces to be added to an access drive that is already narrower than the Code allows is safe. Part of the reasoning for multiple or wider access drives is to provide access for emergency vehicles. Because the applicant is only proposing 5 additional parking spaces, and with the shared parking there is already sufficient parking to serve the proposed use, staff does not feel that it is necessary to make a bad situation any worse. The visual clearance requirements of Chapter 18.795 will be met. The visual clearance standards will continue to be met. FINDING: Based on the analysis above, staff finds that the variance criteria have not been met. In order to find that the proposal can be approved without the variance, the applicant must submit a revised plan that shows the 5 proposed parking spaces deleted from the site plan OR the access drive must be widened to provide, at minimum, a 40-foot pavement width. CONDITION:Submit a revised plan that shows the 5 proposed parking spaces deleted from the site plan OR the access drive must be widened to provide, at minimum, a 40-foot pavement width. Adjustment to the Front Yard Setback: Up to a 25% reduction of the dimensional standards for the front yard setback required in the base zone may be approved by means of a Type I procedure, as governed by Section 18.390.030, using approval criteria contained in Subsection B2 below: A demonstration that the adjustment requested is the least required to achieve the desired affect; The adjustment will result in the preservation of trees, if trees are present in the development area; The adjustment will not impede adequate emergency access to the site; There is not a reasonable alternative to the adjustment which achieves the desired affect. SWAMI VISWA PREMANANDA TEMPLE ADDITION PAGE 11 OF 23 CUP1999-00001/PDR1999-00002NAR1999-00024/MIS1999-00026 PLANNING COMMISSION FINAL ORDER NO.99-03PC . ' • • The applicant has requested an Adjustment to the front yard setback required for a Conditional Use. The Conditional Use standards require a 25-foot setback for Religious Institutions, whereas, the applicant has requested the setback be 20 feet. The front yard setback is adjacent to the existing daycare which is zoned C-P as well. It makes sense to allow this adjustment given that the setback will not be detrimental to another persons privacy or property rights. The reduced setback will not impede adequate emergency access to the site. Staff feels that, given that this is being reviewed as part of a Planned Development which allows flexibility, and that the adjacent property is zoned and developed commercial, that this Adjustment is reasonable and should be approved. � FINDING: Based on the analysis above, staff finds that the front yard setback adjustment is acceptable. Access, Eqress and Circulation: Walkways: On-site pedestrian walkways shall comply with the following standards: Walkways shall extend from the ground floor entrances or from the ground floor landing of stairs, ramps, or elevators of all commercial, institutional, and industrial uses, to the streets which provide the required access and egress. Walkways shall provide convenient connections between buildings in multi-building commercial, institutional, and industrial complexes. Unless impractical, walkways shall be constructed between new and existing developments and neighboring developments; There is an existing walkway along the access drive and there is a walkway proposed from the parking lots to the proposed structures. There is not, however, a clearly marked connection between the 2 walkways across the parking lot. A condition is necessary to insure that this is provided. Wherever required walkways cross vehicle access driveways or parking lots, such crossings shall be designed and located for pedestrian safety. Required walkways shall be physically separated from motor vehicle traffic and parking by either a minimum 6-inch vertical separation (curbed) or a minimum 3-foot horizontal separation, except that pedestrian crossings of traffic aisles are permitted for distances no greater than 36 feet if appropriate landscaping, pavement markings, or contrasting pavement materials are used. Walkways shall be a minimum of four feet in width, exclusive of vehicle overhangs and obstructions such as mailboxes, benches, bicycle racks, and sign posts, and shall be in compliance with ADA standards; and The applicant, as conditioned above, will be required to provide a clearly marked walkway across the parking lot to connect the existing and proposed walkway. By complying with this condition, this standard will be satisfied. Required walkways shall be paved with hard surfaced materials such as concrete, asphalt, stone, brick, etc. Walkways may be required to be lighted and/or signed as needed for safety purposes. Soft-surfaced public use pathways may be provided only if such pathways are provided in addition to required pathways. The plans indicate that the proposed walkway will be concrete. Minimum Access Requirements for Commercial and Industrial Use: Section 18.705.030.1 provides the minimum access requirements for commercial and industrial uses: Table 18.705.3 indicates that the required access width for developments with more than 100 parking spaces is one 50-foot-wide access with a 40-foot pavement width or two 30-foot-wide access points with 24 feet of pavement. Vehicular access shall be provided to commercial or industrial uses, ar�d sh�ll be located to within 50 feet of the primary ground floor entrances; additional requirements for truck traffic may be placed as conditions of site development review. SWAMI VISWA PREMANANDA TEMPLE ADDITION PAGE 12 OF 23 CUP1999-00001/PDR1999-00002NAR1999-00024/MIS1999-00026 PLANNING COMMISSION FINAL ORDER NO.99-03PC ' l�ile�a�cess is only 30 feet and serves over 100 cars. This was approved by a Variance as part of a previous application. The applicant has requested a Variance to allow more parking off of this driveway. As discussed, staff has recommended against this request. Director's Authority to Restrict Access: Section 18.705.030.K states that in order to eliminate the need to use public streets for movements between commercial and industrial properties, parking areas shall be designed to connect with parking areas on adjacent properties unless not feasible. The Director shall require access easements between properties where necessary to provide for parking area connections. The site already has shared parking and access, therefore, this standard is satisfied. FINDING: Based on the analysis above, staff finds that the access and egress standards are not satisfied, however, if the applicant complies with the condition below, this standard will be met. CONDITION: Submit a revised plan that shows a clearly marked walkway across the access drive/parking lot connecting the existing sidewalk and the proposed sidewalk. Landsca in and Screenin —Cha ter 18.745: treet trees: Section 18.745.040 states that all development projects fronting on a public street shall be required to plant street trees in accordance with Section 18.745.040.0 Section 18.745.040.0 required that street trees be spaced between 20 and 40 feet apart depending on the size classification of the tree at maturity (small, medium or large). The property has no street frontage other than the access drive, therefore, this standard can not be applied. Land Use Buffering and Screening: Section 18.745.080 requires that at a minimum the buffer between a proposed Commercial use and residential use must contain a 10-20 foot buffer with trees, lawn/groundcover, shrubs, and screening. The property to the west is zoned and developed with existing single-family residential homes. The applicant must, therefore, provide for a buffer based on the matrix in Table 18.745.2. The applicant's plans show the building will be set back 55 feet from the western property line and landscaping is provided with a laurel hedge, cedar trees and lawn, which provides the most stringent screening option (Level F). Screening - Special Provisions: Section 18.745.050.E requires the screening of parking and loading areas. Landscaped parking areas shall include special design features which effectively screen the parking lot areas from view. Planting materials to be installed should achieve a relative balance between low lying and vertical shrubbery and trees. Trees shall be planted in landscaped islands in all parking areas, and shall be equally distributed on the basis of one (1) tree for each seven (7) parking spaces in order to provide a canopy effect. The minimum dimension on the landscape islands shall be three (3) feet wide and the landscaping shall be protected from vehicular damage by some form of wheel guard or curb. The majority of the parking is existing. The applicant has proposed 5 additional parking spaces which, if the access drive is widened and the spaces are permitted, will have the required screening. FINDING: Based on the analysis above, the landscaping and screening standards have been fully met. SWAMI VISWA PREMANANDA TEMPLE ADDITION PAGE 13 OF 23 . CUP1999-00001/PDR1999-00002NAR1999-00024/MIS1999-00026 PLANNING COMMISSION FINAL ORDER NO.99-03PC Off-Street Parkinq and Loading (18.765): � Disabled-Accessible Parking: All parking areas shall be provided with the required number of parking spaces for disabled persons as specified by the State of Oregon Uniform Building Code and federal standards. Such parking spaces shall be sized, signed and marked as required by these regulations. The majority of parking is existing and the proposed parking spaces, which were intended to be ADA accessible, are not approved unless the access drive is widened. The applicant must, however, provide for ADA accessible spaces to the new structures. The amount of spaces required is based on the number of spaces on this site alone (22 spaces), therefore, one (1) additional ADA space is needed. Access Drives: With regard to access to public streets from off-street parking: access drives from the street to off-street parking or loading areas shall be designed and constructed to facilitate the flow of traffic and provide maximum safety for pedestrian and vehicular traffic on the site; the number and size of access drives shall be in accordance with the requirements of Chapter, 18.705, Access, Egress and Circulation; access drives shall be clearly and permanently marked and defined through use of rails, fences, walls or other barriers or markers on frontage not occupied by service drives; access drives shall have a minimum vision clearance in accordance with Chapter 18.795, Visual Clearance; access drives shall be improved with an asphalt or concrete surface; and excluding single-family and duplex residences, except as provided by Subsection 18.810.030.P, groups of two or more parking spaces shall be served by a service drive so that no backing movements or other maneuvering within a street or other public right-of-way will be required. The access drive to the site is existing. As discussed previously, the dimensions are non- conforming based on the number of parking spaces. Provided they do not increase the parking spaces already approved, the driveway dimension is acceptable as it has been approved by a previous Variance. Parking Lot Striping: Except for single-family and duplex residences, any area intended to be used to meet the off-street parking requirements as contained in this Chapter shall have all parking spaces clearly marked; and all interior drives and access aisles shall be clearly marked and signed to show direction of flow and maintain vehicular and pedestrian safety. The parking lot is existing and parking spaces are clearly marked, therefore, this standard is satisfied. Wheel Stops: Parking spaces along the boundaries of a parking lot or adjacent to interior landscaped areas or sidewalks shall be provided with a wheel stop at least four inches high located three feet back from the front of the parking stall. The front three feet of the parking stall may be concrete, asphalt or low lying landscape material that does not exceed the height of the wheel stop. This area cannot be calculated to meet landscaping or sidewalk requirements. The existing parking area has curbs along the perimeter. There is bark dust adjacent to the parking area that meets the low lying landscape requirement, therefore, this standard is satisfied. SWAMI VISWA PREMANANDA TEMPLE ADDITION PAGE 14 OF 23 CUP1999-00001/PDR1999-00002NAR1999-00024/MIS1999-00026 PLANNING COMMISSION FINAL ORDER NO.99-03PC � ��ac� and Aisle Dimensions: Section 18.765.040.N states that: "except as modified for angled parking in Figures 18.765.1 and 18.765.2 the minimum dimensions for parking spaces are: 8.5' x 18.5' for a standard space and 7.5' x 16.5' for a compact space; aisles accommodating two direction traffic, or allowing access from both ends, shall be 24 feet in width. The parking spaces are existing, therefore, this standard does not apply. Bicycle Parking Location and Access: Section 18.765.050 states bicycle parking areas shall be provided at locations within 50 feet of primary entrances to structures; bicycle parking areas shall not be located within parking aisles, landscape areas or pedestrian ways; outdoor bicycle parking shall be visible from on-site buildings and/or the street. VlOhen the bicycle parking area is not visible from the street, directional signs shall be used to located the parking area; and bicycle parking may be located inside a building on a floor which has an outdoor entrance open for use and floor location which does not require the bicyclist to use stairs to gain access to the space. Exceptions may be made to the latter requirement for parking on upper stories within a multi-story residential building. The proposed bicycle rack is within 50 feet of the entrance Ashram and is not located in parking aisles, landscape areas or pedestrian ways. _ Bicycle Parking Design Requirements: Section 18.765.050.C. The following design requirements apply to the installation of bicycle racks: The racks required for required bicycle parking spaces shall ensure that bicycles may be securely locked to them without undue inconvenience. Provision of bicycle lockers for long-term (employee) parking is encouraged but not required; bicycle racks must be securely anchored to the ground, wall or other structure; bicycle parking spaces shall be at least 2�h feet by six feet long, and, when covered, with a vertical clearance of seven feet. An access aisle of at least five feet wide shall be provided and maintained beside or between each row of bicycle parking; each required bicycle parking space must be accessible without moving another bicycle; required bicycle parking spaces may not be rented or leased except where required motor vehicle parking is rented or leased. At-cost or deposit fees for bicycle parking are exempt from this requirement; and areas set aside for required bicycle parking must be clearly reserved for bicycle parking only. Outdoor bicycle parking facilities shall be surfaced with a hard surfaced material, i.e., pavers, asphalt, concrete or similar material. This surface must be designed to remain well drained. The applicant has not provided detail of the bicycle parking rack, therefore, staff can not determine if this standard has been met. If the applicant submits a detail of the bicycle rack, staff will be able to review it to insure that the design complies with the standards of the Code. Minimum Bicycle Parking Requirements: The total number of required bicycle parking spaces for each use is specified in Table 18.768.2 in Section 18.765.070.H. In no case shall there be less than two bicycle parking spaces. Table 18.768.2 states that for Religious Institutions, one (1) bicycle parking space is required for every 20 seats in the main assembly area. The applicant has indicated that there will be up to 178 chairs in the main assembly, therefore, nine (9) bicycle parking spaces are required. The applicant has indicated that six (6) bicycle parking spaces will be provided. The applicant must revise the plan to provide three (3) additional bicycle parking spaces. Minimum Off-Street Parking: Section 18.765.070.H states that the minimum and maximum parking shall be as required in Table 18.765.2. SWAMI VISWA PREMANANDA TEMPLE ADDITION PAGE 15 OF 23 CUP1999-00001/PDR1999-00002NAR1999-00024/MIS1999-00026 PLANNING COMMISSION FINAL ORDER NO.99-03PC Table 18.765.2 states that the minimum parking for a Religious Institution is one (1) space �or � every two (2) seats. Because up to 178 seats will be provided in the main assembly area, 89 parking spaces are required. There are 22 parking spaces in this site and 74 on the adjacent site with which the applicant has a shared parking agreement. Because the total number of spaces available is 96 and the uses are compatible in that the peak hours do not overlap, this standard has been satisfied. In addition, a condition recommended as part of the Conditional Use approval will insure that no worship services are scheduled during the "normal" office hours. FINDING: Based on the analysis above, the off-street parking and loading standards have been met. CONDITIONS: . Submit a revised plan that shows one (1) van accessible handicap space will be provided that includes a 9-foot-wide space with an 8-foot-wide aisle in front of the proposed development. . Submit a detail of the bicycle rack. . Submit a revised plan that shows three (3) additional bicycle parking spaces will be provided. Tree Removal — Chapter 18.790 Section 18.790.030 requires that a tree plan for the planting, removal and protection of trees prepared by a certified arborist be provided for a conditional use application. The tree plan shall include identification of all existing trees, Identification of a program to save existing trees or mitigate tree removal over 12 inches in caliper, identification of which trees are proposed to be removed, and a protection program defining standards and methods that will be used by the applicant to protect trees during and after construction. The applicant's plans do not show any trees will be removed, therefore, this standard does not apply. FINDING: Because the applicant has not proposed to remove and trees, this standard has been met. Visual Clearance Areas — Chapter 18.795: Section 18.795.020.A. states that the provisions of this chapter shall apply to all development including the construction of new structures, the remodeling of existing structures and to a change of use which increases the on-site parking or loading requirements or which changes the access requirements. Section 18.795.030.B. states that a clear vision area shall contain no vehicle, hedge, planting, fence, wall structure or temporary or permanent obstruction (except for an occasional utility pole or tree), exceeding three feet in height, measured from the top of the curb, or where no curb exists, from the street center line grade, except that trees exceeding this height may be located in this area, provided all branches below eight feet are removed. There are no proposed structures inside of the vision clearance area, therefore, this standard is satisfied. FINDING: Based on the analysis above, the standards of Chapter 18.795, Visual Clearance Areas have been met. SWAMI VISWA PREMANANDA TEMPLE ADDITION PAGE 16 OF 23 CUP1999-00001/PDR1999-00002NAR1999-00024/MIS1999-00026 PLANNING COMMISSION FINAL ORDER NO.99-03PC ' �tree't And Utility Improvements Standards - Chapter 18.810: Chapter 18.810 provides construction standards for the implementation of public and private facilities and utilities such as streets, sewers, and drainage. The applicable standards are addressed below: Streets: Improvements: Section 18.810.030.A.1 states that streets within a development and streets adjacent shall be improved in accordance with the Tigard Development Code (TDC) standards. Section 18.810.030.A.2 states that any new street or additional street width planned as TDC�ion of an existing street shall be dedicated and improved in accordance with the Minimum Rights-of-Way and Street Widths: Section 18.810.030(E) requires an arterial street to have a 60 to 90 right-of-way width and 12-foot lanes. Other improvements required may include on-street parking, sidewalks and bikeways, underground utilities, street lighting, storm drainage, and street trees. This site lies adjacent to SW Hall Boulevard, which is classified as an arterial on the City of Tigard Transportation Plan Map, and is under the jurisdiction of the Oregon Department of Transportation (ODOT). At present, there is approximately 60 feet of ROW according to the most recent tax assessor's map. This roadway will eventually be widened to have 5 lanes with bike lanes. This type of roadway will require the full 90-foot ROW. Therefore, the applicant should dedicate additional ROW along this frontage to provide 45 feet from the centerline. SW Hall Boulevard is currently improved with a centerline-to-curb dimension of approximately 25 feet. This is an interim width approved by ODOT. There is an existing driveway apron that serves the site and other ad�acent uses (Kindercare and Hall Park Office). ODOT submitted comments, dated November 1, 1999, to the City with regard to this project. ODOT is concerned about the current width of the shared access into this site. Of particular concern is the potential for vehicles intending to enter the Kindercare site backing up into Hall Boulevard due to queuing of exiting cars biocking the Kindercare access. 060T believes the access should be widened to provide for three lanes to help alleviate this potential problem. In addition, ODOT recommends the City require the applicant to schedule their peak traffic into this site such that there is no conflict with the peak traffic periods generated by the Kindercare and Hall Park Office sites. These two issues will be covered in more detail in the Planning Department section of this report, under Section 18.705, Access, Egress, and Circulation. Sidewalks: Section 18.810.070.A requires that sidewalks be constructed to meet City design standards and be located on both sides of arterial, collector and local residential streets. , There is an existing sidewalk along the frontage of SW Hall Boulevard adjacent to this site. No further sidewalk improvements are necessary. Sanitary Sewers: Sewers Required: Section 18.810.090.A requires that sanitary sewer be installed to serve each new development and to connect developments to existing mains in accordance with the provisions set forth in Design and Construction Standards for Sanitary and Surface Water Management (as adopted by the Unified Sewerage A�ency in 1996 and including any future revisions or amendments) and the adopted polic�es of the comprehensive plan. Over-Sizin�: Section 18.810.090.0 states that �roposed sewer systems shall include considerat�on of additional development within the area as projected by the Comprehensive Plan. SWAMI VISWA PREMANANDA TEMPLE ADDITION PAGE 17 OF 23 CUP1999-00001/PDR1999-00002NAR1999-00024/MIS1999-00026 PLANNING COMMISSION FINAL ORDER NO.99-03PC Sanitary sewer service for this site has been provided as a part of the Hall Park Office development. A 3-inch pressure line was installed within the shared driveway aisle and ties into the existing public sewer line in SW Hall Boulevard. The pressure sewer line is necessary due to the fact that this site is at a lower elevation that what the public line in Hall Boulevard can serve. The new building on this site must be constructed to have a sewer pump system. No further public sewer improvements are necessary. Storm Drainage: General Provisions: Section 18.810.100.A states requires developers to make adequate provisions for storm water and flood water runoff. Accommodation of Upstream Drainage: Section 18.810.100.0 states that a culvert or other drainage facility shall be large enough to accommodate potential runoff from its entire upstream drainage area, whether inside or outside the development. The City Engineer shall approve the necessary size of the facility, based on the provisions of Design and Construction Standards for Sanitary and Surface Water Management (as adopted by the Unified Sewerage Agency in 1996 and including any future revisions or amendments). The Hall Park Office development lies uphill of this site. The majority of the storm water from that development was directed to the north toward the Highway 217 ROW. The drainage plan for this site should be able to accommodate any sheet flow that reaches this site from the wooded area north of the proposed building. Effect on Downstream Drainage: Section 18.810.100.D states that where it is anticipated by the City Engineer that the additional runoff resulting from the development will overload an existing drainage facility, the Director and Engineer shall withhold approval of the development until provisions have been made for improvement of the potential condition or until provisions have been made for storage of additional runoff caused by the development in accordance with the Design and Construction Standards for Sanitary and Surface Water Management (as adopted by the Unified Sewerage agency in 1996 and including any future revisions or amendments). In 1997, the Unified Sewerage Agency (USA) completed a basin study of Fanno Creek and adopted the Fanno Creek Watershed Management Plan. Section V of that plan includes a recommendation that local governments institute a stormwater detention/effective impervious area reduction program resulting in no net increase in storm peak flows up to the 25-year event. The City will require that all new developments resulting in an increase of impervious surfaces provide onsite detention facilities, unless the development is located adjacent to Fanno Creek. For those developments adjacent to Fanno Creek, the storm water runoff will be permitted to discharge without detention. The applicant's plan indicates that there will be a vegetated swale constructed adjacent to the southern boundary of the site. It is not clear whether the applicant intends for this facility to serve as a detention facility combined with surface water treatment. The applicant may need to adjust their storm drainage plan to accommodate the detention requirement. The plan also indicates that the storm water from this site will be directed to an existing storm drainage line that is located on the adjacent parcels to the east of this site. This existing private storm drainage line is located within an easement granted in favor of this site, as well as the Hall Park Office and Kindercare sites. This fact was discovered as a part of the approval for the Hall Park Office development. No public storm drainage work is necessary to support this development. SWAMI VISWA PREMANANDA TEMPLE ADDITION PAGE 18 OF 23 CUP1999-00001/PDR1999-00002NAR1999-00024/MIS1999-00026 PLANNING COMMISSION FINAL ORDER NO.99-03PC ' C��iliti€s: Section 18.810.120 states that all utility lines, but not limited to those required for electric, communication, lighting and cable television services and related facilities shall be placed underground, except for surface mounted transformers, surface mounted connection boxes and meter cabinets which may be placed above ground, temporary utility service facilities during construction, high capacity electric lines operating at 50,000 volts or above, and: • The developer shall make all necessary arrangements with the serving utility to provide the underground services; • The City reserves the right to approve location of all surface mounted facilities; • All underground utilities, including sanitary sewers and storm drains installed in streets by the developer, shall be constructed prior to the surfacing of the streets; and • Stubs for service connections shall be long enough to avoid disturbing the street improvements when service connections are made. Exception to Under-Grounding Requirement: Section 18.810.120.0 states that a developer shall pay a fee in-lieu of under-grounding costs when the development is proposed to take place on a street where existing utilities which are not underground will serve the development and the approval authority determines that the cost and technical difficulty of under-grounding the utilities outweighs the benefit of under- grounding in conjunction with the development. The determination shall be on a case- by-case basis. The most common, but not the only, such situation is a short frontage development for which under-grounding would result in the placement of additional poles, rather than the removal of above-ground utilities facilities. An applicant for a development which is served by utilities which are not underground and which are located across a public right-of-way from the applicant's property shall pay a fee in- lieu of under-grounding. There are existing overhead utility lines along SW Hall Boulevard. If the fee in-lieu is proposed, it is equal to $27.50 per lineal foot of street frontage that contains the overhead lines. The frontage along this site is 32 lineal feet; therefore, the fee would be $880. ADDITIONAL CITY AND/OR AGENCY CONCERNS REGARDING STREET AND UTILITY IMPROVEMENT STANDARDS: Public Water System: This site lies within the Tualatin Valley Water DistricYs (TVWD) service area. As a part of the Hall Park Office development, domestic and fire water lines were installed to serve both that project and this project. No additional public water line work will be necessary to support this development. Storm Water �uality: The City has agreed to enforce Surface Water Management (SWM) regulations established by the Unified Sewerage Agency (USA) Design and Construction Standards (adopted by Resolution and Order No. 96-44) which require the construction of on-site water quality facilities. The facilities shall be designed to remove 65 percent of the phosphorus contained in 100 percent of the storm water runoff generated from newly created impervious surfaces. In addition, a maintenance plan shall be submitted indicating the frequency and method to be used in keeping the facility maintained through the year. Prior to construction, the applicant shall submit plans and calculations for a water quality facility that will meet the intent of the USA Design Standards. In addition, the applicant shall submit a maintenance plan for the facility that must be reviewed and approved by the City prior to construction. SWAMI VISWA PREMANANDA TEMPLE ADDITION PAGE 19 OF 23 r CUP1999-00001/PDR1999-00002NAR1999-00024/MIS1999-00026 PLANNING COMMISSION FINAL ORDER NO.99-03PC As was stated above, the applicant is proposing to treat the onsite storm water runoff iri a vegetated swale. It appears that the site plan has allowed enough room for an adequately sized swale. To ensure compliance with Unified Sewerage Agency design and construction standards, the applicant shall employ the design engineer responsible for the design and specifications of the private water quality facility to perform construction and visual observation of the water quality facility for compliance with the design and specifications. These inspections shall be made at significant stages throughout the project and at completion of the construction. Prior to final building inspection, the design engineer shall provide the City of Tigard (Inspection Supervisor) with written confirmation that the water quality facility is in compliance with the design and specifications. Grading and Erosion Control: USA Design and Construction Standards also regulate erosion control to reduce the amount of sediment and other pollutants reaching the public storm and surface water system resulting from development, construction, grading, excavating, clearing, and any other activity which accelerates erosion. Per USA regulations, the applicant is required to submit an erosion control plan for City review and approval prior to issuance of City permits. Address Assignments: The City of Tigard is responsible for assigning addresses for parcels within the City of Tigard and within the Urban Service Boundary (USB). An addressing fee in the amount of $30 per address shall be assessed. This fee shall be paid to the City prior to issuance of the site and/or building permit. For this project, the addressing fee will be $30 to account for the new building. FINDING: Based on the analysis above, the street utility and improvement standards have not been met outright, however, if the applicant complies with conditions 10 through 15 specified at the front of this report, the standards will be met. D. ADDITIONAL PLANNED DEVELOPMENT CRITERIA Section 18.350.100(B)(3) (a) through (I) provides additional Planned Development Review approval standards not necessarily covered by the provisions of the previously listed sections. These other standards are addressed immediately below with the following exceptions: The following have been discussed previously in this report and will not be discussed in this Section: 18.350.100.B.3.b, 18.350.100.6.3.f, 18.350.100.B.3.g, 18.350.100.B.3.i, 18.350.100.B.3.j, 18.350.100.B.3.k Relationship to the Natural and Physical Environment: The streets, buildings and other site elements shall be designed and located to preserve the existing trees, topography and natural drainage to the greatest degree possible; Structures located on the site shall not be in areas subject to ground slumping and sliding; There shall be adequate distance between on-site buildings and other on-site and off-site buildings on adjoining properties to provide for adequate light and air circulation and for fire protection; The structures shall be oriented with consideration for the sun and wind directions, where possible; and Trees preserved to the extent possible. Replacement of trees is subject to the requirements of Chapter 18.790, Tree Removal. The buildings have been located on the site to preserve existing trees. There is not significant topography or drainage that will be affected as a result of this proposal. There are no known areas of ground slumping or sliding on site. The proposed setbacks will insure that there is adequate light and air circulation. Fire protection has been considered and the location of these buildings will not hamper fire protection. There are no trees proposed to be removed. SWAMI VISWA PREMANANDA TEMPLE ADDITION PAGE 20 OF 23 CUP1999-00001/PDR1999-00002NAR1999-00024/MIS1999-00026 PLANNING COMMISSION FINAL ORDER NO.99-03PC � � F�iVDING: Based on the analysis above, staff finds the relationship to the natural and physical environment standards have been met. Privacy and Noise: Non-residential structures which abut existing residential dwellings shall be located on the site or be designed in a manner, to the maximum degree possible, to protect the private areas on the adjoining properties from view and noise; FINDING: The temple will be the closest structure to the single-family dwellings west of the site, however, given the distance from the property line and the fact that it is oriented towards Hall Boulevard, this standard is met. The Ashram is considered a residential structure, therefore, this standard does not apply to that structure. Private Outdoor Area - Multi-Family Use: In addition to the requirements of subparagraph (3), each ground-level residential dwelling unit shall have an outdoor private area (patio, terrace, porch) of not less than 48 square feet; Wherever possible, private outdoor open spaces should be oriented toward the sun; and Private outdoor spaces shall be screened or designed to provide privacy for the use of the space. While the use is not truly multi-family, all but 2 of the rooms have a deck, the other 2 have access to a deck via a shared room. FINDING: Based on the analysis above, this standard has been met. Shared Outdoor Recreation Areas - Multi-Family Use: In addition each multiple-dwelling development shall incorporate shared usable outdoor recreation areas within the development plan as follows: Studio units up to and including two bedroom units, 200 square feet per unit; and Three or more bedroom units, 300 square feet per unit. Shared outdoor recreation space shall be readily observable from adjacent units for reasons of crime prevention and safety; The required recreation space may be provided as follows: It may be all outdoor space; or It may be part outdoor space and part indoor space; for example, an outdoor tennis court and indoor recreation room; or It may be all public or common space; or It may be part common space and part private; for example, it could be an outdoor tennis court, indoor recreation room, and balconies on each unit; or Where balconies are added to units, the balconies shall not be less than 48 square feet. While this is not truly multi-family because each room is not a self-contained unit, there are shared worship areas, yoga classrooms and open space. FINDING: Based on the analysis above, this standard has been met. Public Transit: Provisions for public transit may be required where the site abuts a public transit route. The required facilities shall be based on: (a) The location of other transit facilities in the area; and (b) The size and type of the proposed development. The required facilities shall be limited to such facilities as: (a) A waiting shelter; (b)A turn- out area for loading and unloading; and (c) Hard surface paths connecting the development to the waiting area. The access drive fronts SW Hall Boulevard, which is on a transit route, however, because the entire frontage is taken up by the access drive, this standard can not be applied. FINDING: Because the entire frontage on the transit route is taken up by the access drive, there is no place to provide transit facilities and, therefore, this standard can not be applied. SWAMI VISWA PREMANANDA TEMPLE ADDITION PAGE 21 OF 23 CUP1999-00001/PDR1999-00002NAR1999-00024/MIS1999-00026 PIANNING COMMISSION FINAL ORDER NO.99-03PC Floodplain Dedication: � � � Where landfill and/or development is allowed within or adjacent to the 100-year floodplain, the City shall require consideration of the dedication of sufficient open land area for a greenway adjoining and within the floodplain. This area shall include portions of a suitable elevation for the construction of a pedestrian/bicycle pathway with the floodplain in accordance with the adopted pedestrian bicycle pathway plar�. The proposal is not within or adjacent to the 100-year floodplain, therefore, this standard does not apply. FINDING: Because the site is not within or adjacent to the 100-year floodplain, this standard does not apply. SECTION VIII. OTHER STAFF COMMENTS The City Building Division has reviewed the proposed and offered the following comments: (1) All underlying land division must be consolidated into one legal description, (2) Provide accessible parking for phase #1, (3) Provide accessible route from all required exists of phase 1 to the public way. Marked crossings are required; (4) Will there be 2 site permits or done under 1 for both phases? (5) Occupancy will be based on 200 square feet per person; (6) Phase 1 is a R-1 congregate residence; (7) Provide a auto fire alarm, manual fire alarm and fire sprinklers if occupant load is 20; (8) Provide accessible rooms, 1106.2.2, 1106.1.10.6, table 11-B and 1109.25; (9) Correct scale on site plan 1"=30'; (10) Provide fire truck access to within 150 feet of all exterior walls, a turn-around is required; (11) How many quests to a guest room? (12) An elevator is required for temple; (13) Area of rescue is required in lower temple area; (14) Is the lower level a story or a basement?; (15) Type of construction V-1 HR; (16) Is the dining hall a multi-use room?; (17) Ramp to lower level slope? (18) Too much to comment on. The City Police Department has had the opportunity to review the proposal and has requested that a lighting plan be submitted for review and approval. The City of Tigard Utility Manager has had the opportunity to review the proposal and indicated that all sanitary and storm sewer are to be private. The City of Tigard Property ManagemenUOperations Department has had the opportunity to review the proposal and has offered no comments or objections. SECTION IX. AGENCY COMMENTS The Oregon Department of Transportation has reviewed the proposal and offered the following comments: The proposed developmenYs sole access is to Hall Blvd. According to the Oreqon Hiqhway Plan, Hall Blvd. Is a State facility with a District highway classification. We have an interest in ensuring that proposed land uses do not negatively impact the safe and efficient use of this facility. We are concerned with the ability of the two lane highway access to safely accommodate the continued increase in traffic. Particularly, we are concerned that vehicles intending to enter the Kindercare site may not be able to directly turn in due to queuing which blocks the access. This could potentially cause vehicles to back up on the highway creating a potential safety problem. When the adjacent property to the north of the access road develops, the access should be widened to accommodate a three lane section. This improvement would alleviate ODOT's concerns. SWAMI VISWA PREMANANDA TEMPLE ADDITION PAGE 22 OF 23 . CUP1999-00001/PDR1999-00002NAR1999-00024/MIS1999-00026 PLANNING COMMISSION FINAL ORDER NO.99-03PC ' � I�I��e 'r�commend the City condition the Temple Expansion such that their peak traffic generation ties do not coincide with the peak traffic generation times of the Office development to the north or the Kindercare development to the southeast of the site. This condition would allow the Temple to expand without adding traffic pressure to the highway access. We encourage the applicant to work with the property to the north of the access road as they prepare development plans to ensure that the access is widened to accommodate the needs of all the property owners who share the highway access. Staff response: These comments have been discussed under the Street, Utility and Improvement Standards section and Variance discussion of this report. Unified Sewerage Agency has reviewed the proposal and offered comments which have been incorporated into the body of this report. Portland General Electric, NW Natural Gas, TCI Cable, General Telephone, Tri-Met, US West, and Tualatin Valley Water District were given the opportunity to review this proposal and submitted no comments or objections. SECTION X. CONCLUSION It is further ordered that the applicant and the parties to these proceedings be notified of the entry of this order. PASSED: This 6th day of December, 1999 by the City of Tigard Planning Commission. (Signature box below) �. �, C �`�/ Nick Wilso� Planning Commission Chair i:\curpin\julia\C U P99-01.final.doc SWAMI VISWA PREMANANDA TEMPLE ADDITION PAGE 23 OF 23 CUP1999-00001/PDR1999-00002NAR1999-00a24/MIS1999-00026 PLANNING COMMISSION FINAL ORDER NO.99-03PC � — , �� -M• � . �, � i � 1 1ir,c ovF�c sui� c �' � � �y \ ` 31'� l / FlR � I \)� . �\ � / �,� � , . - `� � Z �, � � � y- Q , , . � � � '^ � 229.�9• V/ . . _ �� ♦ �'-TIR_` �/Il� 32 � �TJR .//Cw� � Q r.y� � i� E 0 � � � ��v� �r Fle \��j� ti w �� 1 \ �1� 40' I M1y t V i ��i� I�/ M1 � ��_ ie•� \' � � � i1R - � '� �1 � F y t �I �8 ? '� Z � :� --� a . �� -/�� I cxisnnc I I.i. ..o� � �0' � sm�.;cn�wc DECIDUOUS � Q TREES TO BE REMOVED �' I� 245 —_ _.. _�� /1I �� a �Q c� — P OSED lEMPLE � 226.0 TN (BASEMEN ELEV 217.0) � PHAS (� '7J O a e ry ~ }- � � Z GY YK� �O�wa NSr[ � . � � .-a.� V S W <n: a �ry. . �_ EIaSTN1C 1R � 22� Nt0 $P ES BIKE RACK(6 SPACES) �..o+c..,� �_ PFIASE 1 _ . Ex15TING STRVCRIHF 219t MI PROPOSED ASH FF 219t (MATCH E%I NG PHASE I 0 �� SITE PLAN � CUP I 999-00001/PDR I 999-00002 EXHIBIT MAP N VAR1999=00024/MIS1999=00026 — ma is not to sca�e SWAMI VISWA TEMPLE EXPANSION � �� . - . ST� GEOGRAPniCIN�ORMnTION SVSTEM � I VICINITY MAP ti�y 2�� ' CUP I 999-00001 � ' PDR I 999-00002 I , VAR I 999-00024 sT MIS I 999-00026 c� ' � ____________ u�, o � � �' SWAMI VISWA °' , __ , � TEMPLE EXPANSION �,, , 2 SUBJECT � ' � TAX LOTS w � I `�_ - FAFFLE ? i ��. � � - � ��` � f - -� w � �Q i , w _ � �-- �> Q - c� o � i � � � rn . � LO M ITA N = 0 100 200 300 400 Pee� I � II . . 7"=303 feel �I �i � � � , I �v 1 W W� �.rt� //\ ��` �� Ciry of Ti�ard ! I Q Q �<II \J� Informalion on this map is/or general loption only and � �i .A a h o u l d b e v e n f i e d w i t h t h e D e v e l o p m e�t S e rv i c s�D i v i s i o n. �� 13125 SW Hall Blvd ///�� i` yl Tigard,OR 97223 � � / �,, . �\ (503)639-4171 . \ �_—___�__I� � — /_�;_ .__---_`--� /` �, h11p9Nmw.ci.ligard.or.us Community Development Plot date: Sep 21, 1999;C:�magiclMAGIC03.APR I � , r "EXHIBIT B" NOTICE OF FINAL ORDER BY THE PLANNING COMMISSION N0.99-03PC Swami Viswa Temple Premananda ____________________________________________________ � �515 SW Ha�� B�Vd. CUP1999-00001/PDR1999-00002NAR1999-00023/MIS1999-00026 SWAMI VISWA PREMANANDA TEMPLE ADDITION Tigard, OR 97223 ____________________________________________________ Alpha Engineering Mike Miller, Project Manager Plaza West, Suite 230 9600 SW Oak Street Portland, OR 97223 Marah Danielson Planner/Development Review Department of Transportation, Region 1 123 NW Flanders Portland, OR 97209-4037 Sudhir Adettiwar 16537 NW Paddington Beaverton, OR 97006 Avinash Pradhan 14990 SW Beard Rd. Beaverton, OR 97007 i � : . •�. . TIGARD PLANNING COMMISSION � CITY OF TIGARO � OREGON NOTICE: PEOPLE WISHING TO SPEAK ON ANY ITEM MUST PRINT TI�IR NAME AND ADDRESS ON THIS SI�ET. AGENDA ITEM N: �. � Page�of DATE OF HEARING:�Z/ � / �7 CASE NUMBER(S): C�(P /��lj l 6600 f �f� /lllf�j -U0�02 j �`J — a� OWNER/APPLICANT: �' � �,'Oh LOCATION: ll S/S SG� ��/l �/vd. PLEASE PRINT YOUR NAME, ADDRESS, AND ZIP CODE ---------------------------------------------------------------- ---------------------------------------------------------------- PROPONENT (For the proposal) OPPONENT (Against the proposal) ---------------------------------------------------------------- ---------------------------------------------------------------- (Print Name/Address/Ilp d�Affiliation) (Print Name/Address%!1p&Affiliation) \ ' S i�d��in � �,Q.b�'�� v�.. Name� Name: Address: 1��3 7 N(/�? �rnc�c�,�'�q�t_�J Address: Citv:g��l��'1 State: Q Ziv: ��C?DG, Citv: State: Zip: � ,, l' Name: '��1/� ��{ �� --�1�1`+-, Name: Address: � � '�J �� ' �� ?��ddress: Ciry:�l2��y � State: � � , Zip�"�7�� Citv: State: Zia: Name: Name: Address: Address: Ciry: State: Zin: Citv: � State: Zip: Name: Name: Address: Address: Citv: State: Zip: Eity: State: Zip: Name: Name: Address: Address: Ciri: State: Zia: Citv: State: Zip: , . � ! CONDITIONAL USE APPLICATION '�.- 13125 SW Hal181vd., Tigard, OR 97223(503) 639-4171 FAX: (503) 684-7297 CITY OF TiGARD GENERAL INFORMATION PRE-APP. HELD WITH: �� DATE OF PRE-APP.: Z Property Address/Location(s): � �5 I 5 .s►hl H A L� G L�'� T� 4 A�-� `l�; f>R��' p � g�Z 2�j FOR STAFF USE ONLY Tax Map 8 Tax Lot#(s): � 4 0 O S. (�,� o � N►� Case No.(sj: ��fJ�� ' (-� � � 1 S1 `3 5�f� '3 S�3 Other Case No.(s): ` — � Recei t No.: ^ , / ,� -�J�;', Site Size: 1• (0 7 � chtJ3 � r3,o<O S7• F�� P . Property Owner/Deed Holder(s)': SW A�►'l� VIS�t//� ►'�mA�;,q-t,�� APp�ication Accepted By:� _ �;i';f i , r, ,-� Date: ' / = Address: 11S1s SI�V H/-}LL. [3LV� Phone: ��3-5�$-3073 c�cy: I i G�D,_ o R�c�c�N z�P: �72 23 Applicant•: S�r /�S G�N E� Date Determined To Be Complete: Address: � S �v F Phone: Comp PIan/Zone Designation: Ciry: Zip: �j��G � 'When the owner and the applicant are different people, the applicant �as�– must be the purchaser of record or a lessee in possession with written CIT Area: authorization from the owner or an agent of the owner. The owner(s) Re�.4/25/97 i:VCUrpinVnasterslcua.doc must sign this application in the space provided on the back of this form or submit a written authorization with this application. � PROPOSAL SUMMARY REQUIRED SUBMITTAL ELEMENTS The owners of record of the subject property request Conditional .�L ✓ Application Elements Submitted: Use approval to allow(please be specific): r►C �An 5}�►.�.�C.�c� oF �-��v��s��J ad�� o e�s��g pplication Form L��`'�^ h��,s� c��1 +1�� s�uU�ov� o F Owners SignatureNVritten Authorization 4'«� c� Te�rr,�le q S s►�pyU,� ��..� Title Transfer Instrument or Deed �a� aY� Ca S) Site/Plot Plan _ �tQ� F'�q Y1 . (#of copies based on pre-app check list) Site/Plot Plan (reduced 8'/:"x 11") �i'�� ApplicanYs Statement (ne� (�t of copies based on pre-app check list) ❑ USA Sewer Use Information Card _ (Distn�fbuted/completed at application submittal) ( ' yl ed� Filing Fee�1,615.00 � � � I v4�v0 ��1(��cess :� � ��,4•0 0 0^' �•aGP_i � � . � 1 List any VARIANCF. CONO(T10NAL USE, SENSRNE LANDS, OR OTHER IAND USE ACTIONS to be consideced as part ot this �ppl[catton: �C r�e S S �'� E!►�(;� APPUCANTS: To consider an applfc�tic� comptet�. you will need to submit ALL of the REQI�IRED SIjBMITTAL ELEMENTS as described on the front of this applicat�on in tt�e"Required SubmitUl Elements" box. (Oetailed Submittal Requireme�t Infortnation sheets can be obtained,upon request, for all rypes of Land Use Applicaaons.) THE APPLICANT(S)SHALL CERTIFY THAT: . The above reauest does not violate anv deed restriction� that mav be attached to or imo�e; �oon the s�bjgs; Ri4�S�L. • If the appGcation is granted, t�e appficant w�'p exe�ise the rights granted in accardance with the terms and subjeci to all the conditions and I'imitations of tt�e approval. • All of tt�e above statements and the statemenfs in the plot plan. attachments, and exhibits transmitted herewith, are trve; and the aFpGcants so acknowiedge t�at any pertnit issued, based on this applicaGon, may be revoked if it is found �at arry such siatements are false. ' • The appC�cant has read the entire contents of t�e application, indud'u�g the poficies and uiteria, and understands the requirements for approving or denying the appl'rcation. . SIGNATURES of each owner ot the subject property. DATED this 1 �} day of rn�' G H 1 g�� Owner's Signature S w�M I V I S1�J A 1 Owner's Signature C h2�n�AN�N�A / Owne�s S+gnature Owner's Signature 2 �. /� +�� h m�.l�t `� � . � . PLANNED DEVELOPMENT TYPE III APPLICATION CITY OF TIGARD 13125 SW Hall Blvd., Tigard, OR 97223(503) 639-4171 FAX:(503) 684-7297 o � -6 y^ �,�,e� GENERAL INFORMATION PRE-APP. HELD WITH: DATE OF PRE-APP.: Property Address/Location(s): ��5�S S h/ �� FOR STAFF USE ONLY Tax Map 8�Tax Lot#(s): �j � 3 5 � ✓� D I�� . 1�� ,�35 0� � �D�z 19 99-o�o� Case No.(s): Site Size: +� 2��Gtc�,S Other Case No.{s)�uU��-�DO/ Property Owner/Deed Holder(s)*:�rah�-�rema na.�� X�Stir�i,�. Receipt No.: Address: //5/� S ►„� l��zll g%,�,�. Phone: Application Accepted By: � � - . Date: � � city: T_i e,� r9�Z z�p: 9'7�3 � �° - ' Applicant'`: �a-f'I'LC Date Determined To Be Complete: Address: Phone: City: Zip: Comp Plan/Zone Designation: * When the owner and the applicant are different people, the applicant must be the purchaser of record or a lessee in possession CIT Area: with written authorization from the owner or an agent of the owner with written authorization. The owner(s) must sign this application in Rev.11126/98 i:lcurpinlmasters�pda.doc the space provided on the back of this form or submit a written authorization with this application. PROPOSAL SUMMARY REQUIRED SUBMITTAL ELEMENTS The owners of record of the subject property request permission to ✓ Application Elements Submitted: create a Planned Development consisting of(please be specific): . ��m�� ❑ Application Form (' �c`�'i�'7� �{D GLh P.��.57�i' � �Lu lcEc.�u, • �-�► ❑ Owner's Signature/Written Authorization �g�U� � Te �e. ❑ Title Transfer Instrument or Deed ❑ Site/Plot Plan (#of copies based on pre-app check list) ❑ Site/Plot Plan (reduced 8'/z"x 11") ❑ ApplicanYs Statement (#of copies based on pre-app check list) ❑ 2 Sets of Pre-Addressed/Pre-Stamped Legal Size Envelopes ❑ Filing Fee (Detailed) $ 510.00 (Conceptual) $2,170.0 1 I l Y � • � 1 List any VARIANCE, CONDITIONAL USE, SENSITIVE LANDS, OR OTHER LAND USE ACTIONS to be considered as part of this application: �('��s Yl�rr�c�7<�� ' �la� n��r` l��;iE li� ,-��h�,c.7" APPLICANTS: To consider an application complete, you will need to submit ALL of the REQUIRED SUBMITTAL ELEMENTS as described on the front of this application in the"Required Submittal Elements" box. (Detaifed Submittal Requirement InfoRnation sheets can be obtained, upon request,for all types of Land Use Applications.) THE APPLICANT(S)SHALL CERTIFY THAT: • The above re�uest does not violate any deed restrictions that may be attached to or imposed upon the subject r e • If the application is granted,the applicant will exercise the rights granted in accordance with the terms and subject to all the conditions and limitations of the approval. • All of the above statements and the statements in the plot plan, attachments, and exhibits transmitted herewith, are true; and the applicants so acknowledge that any permit issued,based on this application, may be revoked if it is found that any such statements are false. • The applicant has read the entire contents of the application, including the policies and criteria, and understands the requirements for approving or denying the application. SIGNATURES of each owner of the subject properly. T� DATED this �� day of �s� , 19�� X �' __ Owner's Signature Owner's Signature Owner's Signature Owner's Signature 2 . • C��--{-u c..h m e..v��l- � � • � - VARIAN C E TYPE II APPLICATION CITY OF TIGARD 13125 SW Hall 8lvd., Tigard, OR 97223(503) 639-4171 FAX: (503) 684-7297 O�-��- I/�2 GENERAL INFORMATION PRE-APP. HELD WITH: DATE OF PRE-APP.: Property Address/Location(s): �J 5 I S .s►•� �-� � // ��/�� FOR STAFF USE ONLY Tax Map &Tax Lot#(s): �-S/ 3s Q A 0/�DO y I�Q'� �I,,,� ., -, '� J O �j Case No.(s): bli� ,'�l y�'G�'�'�-� 3 Other Case No.(s)'L°cl��1�� Site Size: f� �� Q�it!_S Receipt No.:II - / "�I Property OwneNDeed Holder(s)*:.�T�c. nv�.�-f�tn n��la �� m Application Accepted By: Date: ��`�C'l, Address: ��5 I� ��1 /-�G ll f3/✓�/. Phone: City:��Td, O� Zip: �7��3 � ApplicanY: S(a.�h.� Date Determined To Be Complete: Address: Phone: Comp Plan/Zone Designation: City: Zip: • When the owner and the applicant are different people, the applicant must be the purchaser of record or a lessee in possession CIT Area: with written authorization from the owner or an agent of the owner. The owner(s) must sign this application in the space provided on the Rev.ti/26/98 i:lcurpinlmasterslvariance.doc � back of this form or submit a written authorization with this application. � PROPOSAL SUMMARY REQUIRED SUBMITTAL ELEMENTS The owners of record of the subject property request permission for a Variance to the following provision(s)of the Community Development � Application Elements Submitted: Code (please be specific): ❑ Application Form ��u.Le-nC� `�O Q-cLE-�S W � C.��._ ❑ Owner's Signature/Written Authorization ❑ Title Transfer Instrument or Deed ❑ Site/Plot Plan (#of copies based on pre-app check list) ❑ Site/Plot Plan (reduced 8'/:"x 11") ❑ Applicant's Statement (#of copies based on pre-app check list) ❑ 2 Sets of Pre-Addressed/Pre-Stamped Legal Size Envelopes ❑ Filing Fee (Administrative)...............$545.00 1 • . ' , List any VARIANCE OR OTHER LAND USE ACTIONS to be considered as part of this application: � -E e� i �0 APPLICANTS: To consider an application complete, you will need to submit ALL of the REQUIRED SUBMITTAL ELEMENTS as described on the front of this application in the"Required Submittal Elements" box. (Detailed Submittal Requirement Information sheets can be obtained, upon request,for all types of Land Use Applications.) THE APPLICANT(S)SHALL CERTIFY THAT: • The above reauest does not violate any deed restrictions that may be attached to or imposed ur�on the subject ro . • If the application is granted, the applicant will exercise the rights granted in accordance with the terms and subject to all the conditions and limitations of the approval. • All of the above statements and the statements in the plot plan, attachments, and exhibits transmitted herewith, are true; and the applicants so acknowledge that any permit issued, based on this application, may be revoked if it is found that any such statements are false. • The applicant has read the entire contents of the application, including the policies and criteria, and understands the requirements for approving or denying the application. SIGNATURES of each owner of the subject property. � � , DATED this � day of � � , 19 G? , /` _. Owner's Signa re Owner's Signature Owner's Signature Owner's Signature 2 J��,��1 � �� c�2 � �C-� �vc� . � � : �� C�iL/ c�-�i4��i l _ � , t�s QPn`� -�Z� 1�2� - �-�s '�s C� � �� -� C� �s �� C�sc� �c �f� , - - - __ _ - -- --- - - - -- - - - __ __ _ _ � .-- -- � _�_--_ i i i ► � ,:. r �-,r r�; ;:�;,�-��,i-, __ ��c:;f�n�r c�f F>�=,�rr:�r�ia�- E�;�: .r..k� r.G�� r.,r.�. ,�,;.; -. _ _.,. ( i';-a;-��l=�. iat�1f3Uhdi' , .l ?:''� I • i.ftF.�) 1:�� ,�FiT.? , i� I i�.i"��-1�Z�=�=. . t. � tJ�ar�4l�: � i it��-iia�*1Ci� ��li<t'tl��I�ti�i'�'t��=l�ls�hJl:��i i��a`;I-# «t�ICllJfi^�`f . �, ` i�ti'�1��:�_��..�"� . 1l !r�! �: :c1.J FdF�I_.t.. t:t..VI) ��1�;Y'hiE";�.il' DE;I'E� . k�.;�'11�: i *T�,;�:��)` �_;f� r;ll�a.!'.:ttft::',t[��d . I 7� .. I , I �..�i�S±�i-'!1�;1: 11( t t's'�'f�i� h?1' �3hlf�ili��1?' ��:s;1i �:�t ZF��Ci��:r. (:lf F'i i':a�7F t�.i'i Fti�i%-i�.11`!-� r�'i t 7(:� ' .._.._. _ _ _ _ _. ... _. _. .. .. ,. __... ... .. _ . ..__ _ .�...._.... , I i._�ahli t it�i� i;f��'�L. .._.. .. :.7::�'�, �,tiG1 � � � ( { � . � . . . f � �_:i_��z�.._��4��.y �N 1 1�.1 ':� '�W ;ii��l_l_ Lil_'•JI'�, '-i I:GF-al2"t�, �4�? �I��?; � CFit_C.F: k� 1 9.=f4? � � T'C)1 Fal_ �-�MC�l.11�l"I� ��=a T I"� .. __ .. ..� 1?:��c. iC�4'+ � f � � ; r �ITY OF TIGia�2D ��O l!!Jtt.�!]I 1 y-I)t'Y L'�O�1flP U t .Slr��piu,�]_;i �b'rfter��rnnrurrity IAND USE PROPOSAL DESCRIPTION � � 120 DAYS=1-12-2000 FILE NO.: CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT(CUPI 1999-00001 PLANNED DEYELOPMENT REVIEW[PDRI 1999-00002 VARIANCE[VAR)1999-00024 SETBACN ADIUSTMENT[MISI 1999-00026 FILE TITLE: SWAMI VISWATEMPLE FJ(PANSION APPLICANT/ Swami Viswa Premananda PLANNING Alpha Engineering OWNERS: 11515 SW Hall Blvd. CONSULTANT: Mike Miller, Project Manager Tigard, OR 97223 Plaza West, Suite 230 9600 SW Oak Street Portland, OR 97223 REQUEST: The applicant has requested Conditional Use Approval to expand the existing Ashram (temple). The applicant is also requesting Planned Development approval to allow the residential use of two bedrooms for the residents and eight guestrooms. A variance has been requested to the access width. An adjustment to the front yard setback for a religious facility has also been requested. LOCATION: The site is located at 11515 SW Hall Blvd. The properties are also identified as WCTM 1S135DA Tax Lot 1400 and 3503. �ONES: C-P; Professional Commercial. �4PPLICABLE REVIEW CRITERIA: Community Development Code Chapters 18.330, 18.370, 18.390, 18.510, 18.530, 18.705, 18.745, 18.765, 18.775, 18.790, 18.795 and 18.810. �IT AREA: East CIT FACILITATOR: List Available Upon Request DECISION MAKING BODY: COMMENTS SENT: Se�te_mber22,1999 DUE: October6,1999 ❑ STAFF DECISION DATE OF DECISION: ❑ HEARINGS OFFICER [MONJ DATE OF HEARING: TIME:7:00 PM 0 PLANNING COMMISSION [MONJ DATE OF HEARING: November15,1999 TIME:l:30PM ❑ CITY COUNCIL RUESJ DATE OF HEARING: TIME:):30 PM COMPONENTS RELATED TO THE PROJECT AVAILABLE FOR VIEWING IN THE PLANNING DIVISION � VICINITY MAP O LANDSCAPING PLAN 0 NARRATIVE � SITE PLAN 0 ARCHITECTURAL PLAN TRAFFIC IMPACT STUDY ARBORIST REP�RT 0 OTHER STAFF CONTACT: lulia Powell Haiduk,Associate Planner [503)639-4111 ext 40l CUP 1999-00001 Swami Viswa Temple Expansion LAND USE PROPOSAL .,�. P��arch 30, 1999 CiTY OF TIGARD Swami Viswa Premananda OREGON 11515 SW Hall Boulevard Tigard, OR 97223 Re: Letter of Incomplete Application for CUP 99-0001 Located at 11515 SW Hall Blvd; WCTM 1 S135DA01400. Dear Swami Viswa Premananda: Thank you for submitting the conditional use application to allow a religious institution on the 1.67 acre parcel of land located at 11515 SW Hall Boulevard, in the Professional/Administrative Commercial (C-P) Zone. Staff reviewed the application and determined that it is incomplete. Please clarify or submit the following information so that the use permit application can be processed: S��1. Submit two copies of self-addressed and self-stamped envelopes for the 500-foot public notice mailing requirement. Also, submit a map showing the area that will be noticed and a list of the names and addresses of the property owners who will be notified of your request. 2. Submit a project narrative (18 copies) describing the following: 1 . The number of chairs that can fit in the main assembly. /�� . The hours of operation for any activity at the ashram and temple that are proposed. . The number of people that will reside at the facility. Additional on-site parking may be needed if the residential use conflicts with the parking needs of the office use. . . Describe what will be occurring during the three phases noted on the plans. For example, describe the approximate dates for each phase, the proposed uses, hours of operation and size of the facilities that will be built. �,l�-�,�� . You will also need to address in the narrative the City's code criteria when ��L�� requesting approval of a conditional use (and a religious institution) in the C-P Zone. Attached (Attachment 1) is a copy of the code provisions that need to be addressed. 13125 SW Hall BNd., Tigard, OR 97223 (503)639-4171 TDD (503)684-2772 Page 1 of 3 . 3. Submit a site plan that shows the three phases of building construction. Also, include the proposed height and size of the facilities, the proposed landscaping, the bicycle and vehicle parking areas (even if it is on the adjoining parcel), sidewalks, setbacks, lighting, signs, mailboxes, and enclosed garbage enclosures. Please 5� submit an 8Yz" by 11" version of this revised site plan. The site plan does not need to show elevations, grading, utilities, or erosion control measures. Please note that the front yard setback for a religious institution is 2 f et. This means e propose u er from the front property line. 4. Submit a landscape plan (18 copies} showing the location, size and type of trees, shrubs and ground cover that will be planted on the site. Please note the total area s� or square footage that will be landscaped so we may be sure that 15% of the site is landscaped, as it required for the C-P Zone. s� 5. Submit 18 copies of a tree removal and replacement plan for any trees over 6 inches of caliper that will be removed. S� 6. A buffering plan. The code requires buffering be provided along the west property line since the property abuts a residential zone. This requirement may be satisfied with landscaping. Attachment 2 discusses the options for meeting the buffering requirements. This may be located on the landscape plan. n,�.� 7. Our office sees that you have paid the fee for an access variance. Please complete the attached variance application to request a reduction of the required a 40-foot-wide driveway to 24-feet (when it provides access to more than a hundred (100) parking spaces). You may wish to discuss this matter with Mr. Jim Waddle. He recently came to our office to discuss adding offices along the north side of the accessway and was also advised that the driveway needs to be enlarged. Mr. Waddle's phone number is 221-2003. The variance form and the findings that need to be addressed are also attached (Attachment 3). � �.�G� 8. Please submit a final copy of the reciprocal parking agreement. The second party of d`� the agreement did not sign the version you submitted nor were the exhibits included. �`' One final note, please be aware that the Tigard Community Development Code does not allow residential uses in the CP Zone at this location. You have two options in which to be allowed to build an ashram at this location. Your options are as follows: '� �}-- . You may request to place the land in a Planned Development (PD) Zone. According �. to the code, a PD Zone may allow a maximum of 25% of the total gross floor area of a permitted commercial use to be used for residential uses; or �j . You may request to change the zoning code to amend the land use classification section so that residential uses are considered to be an appropriate accessory use of a religious institution (Section 18.130.020B9). 3/30/99 Swami Viswa Premananda Ltr. Page'L of 3 Re: Incomplete Application Submittal for CUP 99-0001 The PD and Zone Ordinance Amendment applications are also attached (Attachment 4 and Attachment 5). Should you have any questions or need any assistance, please feel free to call me. My phone number is 639-4171, extension 317. Please note that the City's development code is on the Internet so that you may directly access it. The e-mail address is www.ci.tigard.or.us\cd\toc.htm. Sincerely, �-�u�i� %��c.�— Doris Michael Associate Planner I:\curpin\doris\cuplcup99-1 ashramincomplete.doc Attachments 151: #1 - Conditional Use Permit Criteria/Findings (5 pgs.) #2- Buffering Requirements (8 pgs.) #3-Variance Application and Variance Findings (4 pgs.) #4 - Planned Development Application {2 pgs.) #5-Zone Ordinance Amendment Application (2 pgs.) c: CUP 99-0001 Land use file 1999 Planning correspondence file 3/30/99 Swami Viswa Premananda Ltr. Page 3 of 3 Re: Incomplete Application Submittal for CUP 99-0001 ALPHA ENGINEERING, INC. August 19, 1999 Mr. Mark Roberts City of Tigard Community Development Department 13125 SW Hall, PO Box 23397 Tigard, OR 97223 RE: Letter of Incomplete Application for CUP 99-0001 Tigard Ashram Project Job No. 500-387 Dear Mark: In response to City of Tigard's letter dated March 30, 1999 regarding completeness issues of the "Tigard Ashram" project application, we have prepared the following responses and findings. A copy of your letter is attached for your reference. 1. Submit two copies of self-addressed and self-stamped enve%pes for the 500- foot public notice mailing requirement. Also, submit a map showing the area that will be noticed and a list of the names and addresses of the property owners who will be notified of your request. RESPONSE: Included with this submittal are two sets of self-addressed/stamped envelopes as well as a map showing the notice area and a list of property owner names and addresses. 2. Submit a project narrative describing the following: � The number of chai�s that can fit in the main assembly. Approximately 178 chairs fit in the main assembly. • The hours of operation fo� any activity at the ashram and temple that are proposed. Ylaza V4��,t•Saitr'?311•9f�U11 S�� I)ak• P��rtlan�L C)rrc��n 9�'?'?3 Office 503-45Z-8003•Fax:iO3-45Z-8043 RESPONSE: The Ashram will have daily yoga classes scheduled from 6-8 p.m., plus individual scripture instruction as requested, primarily on weekends. The Temple hours are primarily on Saturdays and Sundays, with an occasional meeting after 6 p.m. on weekdays. � The number of peop/e that will reside at the facility. Additional on-site parking may be needed if the residential use conflicts with the parking needs of the office use. RESPONSE: Two people reside at the facility at this time. • Describe what will be occurring during the three phases noted on the plans. Fo� example, describe the approximate dates for each phase, the proposed uses, hours of operation and size of the facilities that will be built. RESPONSE: The initial application described three phases, but has been amended to two phases. Phase 1 encompasses the addition to the Ashram tresidential dormitory for monks) and Phase 2 includes the building of the Temple. The approximate date of the beginning of construction is October 1999 for the Ashram. As the funds become available, the Temple will be built. The exact date for the beginning of construction of the temple cannot be confirmed at this time, however, the owners are hoping to begin construction within a year of completion of Phase I. The total square footage for Ashram including the existing house and the addition is 4,840 square feet. The Ashram will include eight guestrooms, two bedrooms for the residents, and classrooms for meditation and yoga instructions as well as retreats. The proposed Temple will encompass approximately 9,000 square feet, with 4,500 square feet per floor. The Temple use is primarily for worship. • You will also need to address in the nar�ative the City's code criteria when requesting approval of a conditional use fand a religious institution) in the G P Zone. 18.330.050 Additional Development Standards for Conditional use Types B. Additiona/ development standards. The additional dimensional requirements and app�oval standards for conditional use are as fol%ws: 9. Religious lnstitutions: a. Minimum lot size shall be 20,000 square feet; RESPONSE: The Tax Lot 1400 is 76,230 square feet in size. b. Setbacks: 1)The front yard setback shal/ be a minimum of 25 feet. RESPONSE: The applicant requests an adjustment to the front yard setback requirement of 25 feet by 5 feet. The plan proposes a 20 foot setback from the front yard. The applicant feels this is justified for several reasons: 1 ) As Tax Lot 1400 is a flag lot, the "front" yard of the Ashram actually abuts the rear yard of the existing Kinder Care facility. Rear yard setbacks are only 20 feet which is what this plan is proposing. It is arguable as to whether this yard should be labeled as a "front yard" as it does not front on any street. 2) The 25 foot front yard setback requirement applies to religious facilities only. Front yard setbacks for residential uses are 20 feet. As the ashram is the residential component of the project (it will only be used for guestrooms} the applicant feels that the residential standard should apply 3} The applicant is proposing to provide a buffer and screening in accordance with Tigard code 4} The proposed Ashram will be less than 30 feet in height and will not be out of scale with the neighborhood. (1) On corner lots and through lots, the setback shall be a minimum of 20 feet, plus meet visual clearance areas, Chapter 18. 795; RESPONSE: The lot is not a corner or through lot, therefore, this item does not apply. (21 The side yard setback shall be a minimum of 20 feet; RESPONSE: All side yard setbacks are 20 feet or more. (4) The rear yard setback shall be a minimum of 20 feet; and RESPONSE: The rear yard setback is 20 feet or greater. (51 Each setback shall be increased five feet for every 10 feet of building height over 45 feet. RESPONSE: The proposed building and building addition do not exceed 45 feet in height. 3. Submit a site plan that shows the three phases of building construction. Also, include the proposed height and size of the facilities, the proposed landscaping, the bicyc% and vehic% parking areas (even if it is on the adjoining parcell, sidewalks, setbacks, lighting, signs, mailboxes, and enclosed garbage enc%sures. Please submit an 8 %z " by 1 1" version of this revised site plan. The site plan does not need to show e%vations, grading, utilities, or erosion control measures. Please note that the front yard setback for a religious institution is 25 feet. This means the proposed ashram facility will need to be further from the front property line. RESPONSE: A revised site plan showing the items listed is included with this submittal. The proposed landscaping is shown on the attached landscape plan, vehicle parking areas are denoted, as are setbacks. There will not be any additional lighting proposed as the existing parking area already has adequate � lighting. No signs are proposed at this time and the exact mailbox location will be determined by the post office. Trash enclosures will not be necessary and will be accommodated with standard trash can that will be stored internal to the building. Please see response to section 18.330.050 B9b above in regard to front yard setbacks. 4. Submit a landscape plan (18 copiesl showing the location, size and type of trees, shrubs and ground cover that will be planted on the site. Please note the total area or square footage that will be landscaped so we may be sure that 15% of the site is landscaped, as is required for the C-P Zone. RESPONSE: A landscape plan showing the location, size and type of trees, shrubs and ground cover that will be planted on the site is included with this submittal package. The total area of the site is approximately 89,100 square feet, and the total area landscaped is about 57,000 square feet, which is about 64% of the site—which exceeds the standard by a factor of four.. 5. Submit 18 copies of a tree remova/and replacement plan for any t�ees over 6 inches of caliper that will be removed. A tree removal and replacement plan is depicted on the landscape plan. Only two trees are proposed to be removed, which would be close to the foundation of the proposed temple. 6. A buffering plan. The code requires buffering be p�ovided along the west property line since the property abuts a residential zone. This requirement may be satisfied with landscaping. Attachment 2 discusses the options for meeting the buffering requirements. This may be located on the landscape p/an. RESPONSE: A vegetative buffer along the western boundary is shown on the landscape plan. Based on the buffer matrix, Option C-2 will be utilized. Accordingly, the buffer must be at least 8' wide, with trees spaced between 15 and 30' (depending on their size) and a five foot tall fence. The fence option was chosen and will be constructed to provide a continuous sight obscuring screen. 7. Our offrce sees that you have paid the fee for an access variance. Please complefe the aftached variance application to request a reducfion of fhe required 40-foot-wide driveway to 24-feet (when it provides access fo more than a hundred (100) parking spaces. You may wish to discuss this matter with Mr. Jim Waddle. He recenf/y came fo our offrce to discuss adding offices along the north side of the accessway and was a/so advised thaf the driveway needs to be enlarged. 18.370.020 Adjustments C. Special Adjustments 3. Adjustment to access and egress standards (Chapter 18. 705) b. The Director may approve, approve with conditions, or deny a request for an adjustment from the access requirements contained in Chapter 18. 705, based on the following criteria: (11 /t is not possible to share access; (21 There are no other alternative access points on the street in question or from another street; (31 The access separation requirements cannot be met; (4) The request is the minimum adjustment required to provide adequate access; (5l The approved access or access approved with conditions will result in a safe access; and (61 The visual clearance requirements of Chapter 18. 795 will be met. RESPONSE: The criteria as listed above absolutely applies to this particular site and the proposed Ashram/Temple project. Apparently, it is not possible to share access as the property owner to the north has not agreed to allowing additional land to be dedicated for access. Only the City has the authority to require this additional access width. As a property owner the applicant's request can be refused by the adjacent property owner. Moreover, this access point is the only point of ingress and egress for the entire project—there is no alternative. The request is for a 24 foot access width as is currently existing. As there will be no parking permitted along this entire lane, 24 feet will be provide safe access. As well there is no issue with visual clearance along Hall. 8. Please submit a final copy of the reciprocal parking agreement. The second party of the ag�eement did not sign the version you submitted nor were the exhibits included. RESPONSE: Included with this submittal is a complete copy of the reciprocal parking agreement, showing all required signatures. ,� Also included with this submittal is a Planned Development application. The total gross floor area proposed is 13,840 square feet. The residential uses comprise 3,360 square feet, which is less than 25% of the total. We appreciate your assistance with this project thus far, as well as your prompt review and approval of our submittal materials. Please let me know if you have any questions or need additional information. Sincerely, ALPHA ENGINEERING, INC. r �� Mike Miller Project Manager _•; __ . - .—T-- ---- -- - - --- - - , ---- --- ------- � __ ___ - ---- � - — �_ � � . � — ,- �� — �-�i`; �, <:�,�;�,�s � _ r- ad�� \ - - - - � � � -��, - - .. _ �c-� `�N`'� _• �o�t� x:«s �� _ -- .. 'b. ''� �� - -- - °� �� °� �:� :.J �.- � � �, �� %�;�,� � - '�_� ; \ �t �� METZGER RES LEW15 - �� .,�I— � �� —�� „'� �� . " - rr �' " �o��eer ;I�, �''- :> �,� _. _ .�o,....,. �, �in- i � - --- -. �� - � � �� ' �� i wi".:�°'�°o•'�M.�'. I .�... t �xu�w-�:o� - , ➢FCIOU��S � -�,�AlEfroY� ._' ' '.__.._. ._ )20` i TO�MMpy\1� ra � _ PC�A[Y ��\ Y � _ —� __� v A , � �� 1 � oRn rtua�E ^'— � I �a,Y��' , —_ �_,_- � �t.._, �� _ .o, :I� , � �.E,�� . � � , ___ �n - __ � _._..' � � �� -�.� \ � r= r f i � -��" ,�' Y_�'- _ _ �� :� _ - f xm . '^°'°e� ��i ��•�'`- � _ �� . � , . . � , � -_,�., \•� \ .A °�.: � �,r, �s�.nns.cEei�� 91T'MART �� - - '�'� �� j - � - . _ — �- __�� ,, � , o.._ .�...,� . ;,.�. ; .- �� Q , , ,_, �, : `� �`�, - - \ � � ..�. � ..�, � � ;�� - � � ' �:� � __--- ` . �.,�� 9�ri,. � — � ..� .,.,�, � ��` � � � — F. - ...�..��.w,..M �:� , Q . ; � . a �. � �� e�._� I . Yd� \ ` g. Y` , F .. �� '\ �� ` ot,...i TiT; i __' \�{:`: ,_", .. _.. ,- 1' \ \ \' �51� •y.�ar Z� —_–"_ � 'eRl �c�w�.��.�� ! � .. .. ..._. . .. � ...-�'\ )rp\�i1p ??r �� 3�?�+.ae".`"ce��--�.i-�/+�E',-=_�--'=- }��i �W n �.� \ �'�h ll-�� PLAZA CAROEN MARTYENT9' � . . -. � ,,.- �'t� jJ„�I ;� I � ev zw esm.� s '�I' ° .�� SITE PL.�W ��,n�7 �I � �V� . -�*�, _ ' ' " . . I ! i i C m ' i . � � ,i,;,,;�,n.,,,��,u,, � CRY OF TIGARD September 15, 1999 �REG�N Swami Viswa Premananda 11515 SW Hall Boulevard Tigard, OR 97223 RE: Application for CUP1999-00001, PD1999-00002, and VAR1999-00024 Dear Swami Viswa Premananda: This letter is to inform you that the City has received the documents requested in the March 30, 1999 incompleteness letter. Staff has reviewed this additional information and has deemed the application complete. Because the proposal involves a request for Planned Development, Staff will schedule the proposal for review before the Planning Commission. Staff has scheduled a tentative hearing date of November 15, 1999. Please be aware that this date may change, however, you will receive notice of the hearing prior to the hearing date. Please feel free to contact me if you have any questions regarding this letter or your application at 639-4171 x407. Sincerely, /��,�/ � / Julia Powell Hajduk Associate Planner I:curpinljulialAshram acclet.doc c: Hayli Walker, Alpha Engineering Plaza West, Suite 230 9600 SW Oak Portland, OR 97223 CUP1999-00001 land use file 1999 Planning correspondence file 13125 SW Hall Blvd., Tigard, OR 97223 (503)639-4171 TDD (503)684-2772 _ _ .� SEP 20 '99 12�46PM ALPHP �NGINEERIN._ P.2/2 ALPEiA ENGINEERING, INC. September 20, I999 Julia Hajduk City of Tigard I3125 SW HaII Blvd. Tigard, Or 97223 RE: CUP1999-0�1,PD1999-Op002, VARI999-00024 Tigazd Ashram- 500-387 Julxa, In response to �our message of 9l17/99, the proposed Ashxazn arad temple construction are to be on Tax Lots 1400 and 3503 of Ta�c Map 1 S 1 35DA. My understar�ding is that tax Lot 3540 is involved due to the shared parlQng agreement onIy. If you have any more questions, feel free to call me. Sam, at GEOStandards{646-9069) is our client contact, and to rriy�owledge, will be responsible for handling the project to completion_ 'T'hank you, /�� % �� Hayli WaIker Ptazu WesT - Suit�� '1:30 _ 9li00 SW Ouk _portlund, Uredon 9i'_»� Uf'fi��i: SU3-452-$q0:i � Fax 5U3-�S'_>-8U�3 .�...r.:il��l�u�rn�.i•�iut - + STATE ur OREGON � , County of Washington SS I, Jerry R.Hanson, Director of Assess- ment and Taxation and Ex-Qfficio Counry Clerk for said county, do hereby certify that the within irtstrument of writing was received and recorded in book of records of said county. r(�� Jerry R. Hanson, Director of Assessmertt and Taxation, Ex- OfffC�c�Gaunty Clerk Doc : 95001169 Rect: 136198 251 . 00 O1/05/1595 �2: 37: 09PM �— � � . . , -fi STEWART TITLE COA�F/1PlY tv'O. ��C��-�!�! ��j'0�,� Ft�TUR�V UOCUYiENI iU Uc31ti�V[E BELAW �� ,�STEWAR'T TITLE /�U AFTER RECORDING RETURN TO: UNTIL FURTHER NOTICE, ALL FUTURE � TAX STATEMENTS SHALL BE SENT TO: BRAHMA PREMANANDA ASHRAM BRAHMA PREMANANDA ASHRAM ��i�� 7�71�1/�/r�,t�'�'��//��/ 11515 SW HALL BLVD. ��'��'�� /� TIGARD, OR 97223 11515 �� HALL SLVD. TAX ACCO[]NT NO. : 1S1 35DA 01400 Tigard, Oregon 97223 STATUTORY WARRANTY DEED DAVID W. HUGHES and WOODROW W. HUGHES and WILLIAM BLUE, Grantor, conveys and warrants to BRAHMA PREMANANDA ASHRAM, a non-profit organization, grantee, the following described real property free of encumbrancea except as specifically set forth herein situated in WASHINGTON County, Oregon, to-wit: SEE EXEIIBIT "A" ATTACHED HERETO AND MADE A PART HEREOE. The said property is free from encumbrances except: Rights of the public in and to any portion of the herein described premises lying within the boundaries of roads or highways; Easements, restrictions, reservations, covenants, conditions and provisions of record. Proposed roadway as delineated on the Washington County Tax Assessor Map; Encroachment as disclosed on deed recorded 03/09/1988 as Fee No. 88-9617. THIS INSTRUMENT WILL NOT ALLOW USE OF THE PROPERTY DESCRIBED IN THIS INSTRUMENT IN VIOLATION OF APPLICABLE LAND USE LAWS AND REGULATIONS. BEEORE SIGNING OR ACCEPTING THIS INSTRUMENT, THE PERSON ACQUIRING EEE TITLE TO THE PROPERTY SHOULD CHECK WITH THE APPROPRIATE CITY OR COUNTY PLANNING DEPARTMENT TO VERIFY APPROVED USES AND TO DETERMINE ANY LIMITS �N LAWSUITS AGAINST FARMING OR EOREST PRACTICES A5 DEFINED IN ORS 30.930. The true consideration for this conveyance is $208,000.0�. Dated this �,�� day of December, 1994. � �, , . VID W. UGH S W DROW W. H �� 1 WILLIAM BLUE r ti M'� �SHINUTON CO�JNTY '' - \`� R£AL PRL�PERTY TRANSfER 7AX `��.- � s ao .�� -5- �s STATE OE OREGON ��, -� *'- ` F� Pn�u DI:TE COUNTY OF WASHINGTON � Personally�'ppeared the above named DAVID W. HUGHES, WILLIAM BLUE and WOODROW W. HUGHES and acknowledged the foregoing instrument to be their voluntary act and deed. � �� ' � _, f�Fi ICtA.LSEAL Nota Publ ic for �-x Slt�9�it FR.aF.YfES OREGON i s�f,'F} �.�niA�if^'J43 ( "( Ov F`` �`�� ,� , ;ic,�� My commission expires 2/23/98 �� d,AISSIC�•'--^ ` MY CO . : �� __ . . ..__._ � - "- �r - � + F�'+Wi� . Order No. 94090402-W EXHIBIT "A" PARCEL I : Beginning at the Southeast corner of Lot 23, Block "0" , METZGER ACRE TRACTS, as shown by the duly recorded plat thereof, in the County of Washington, State of Oregon; thence Westerly along the South line of said lot 300 feet, more or less, to the Southwest corner of said lot; thence North along the West line of said Lot 23, 75 feet, more or less; thence Easterly and parallel with the South line of said lot, 300 feet more or less; thence South and along the East line of said Lot 23, 75 feet, more or less, to the place of beginning. EXCEPTING� TEEREFROM a parcel of land located in the Northeast one-quarter of the Southeast one-quarter of Section 35, Township 1 South, Range 1 West, of the Willamette Meridian, in the County of Washington and State of Oregon, more particularly described as follows: Commencing at a found 2 inch iron pipe at the Southeast corner of the David C. Graham Donation Land Claim No. 52, said point also being the initial point of GRAHP,M ACRES; thence tracing the West line of the Thomas Stott Donation Land Claim No. 53 , South 1" 46 ' 47" West 829 .76 feet to a point on the South line of Lot 23, METZGER ACRE TR.ACTS; thence tracing said South line East 282 . 60 feet to a found 1/2 inch iron pipe 30 feet, more or less, West of the centerline of Hall Boulevard (County Road No. 947 ) and the true point of beginning of this description; thence South 65 .08 feet; thence South 89 � 11 ' 11" West 291.77 feet to a point on the monumented West line of METZGER ACRES TRACTS; thence North 1` Ol ' 00" East 108. 05 feet; thence North 89 ` 11 ' 11" East 289 .85 feet to a point 30 feet, more or less, West of the centerline of said Hall Boulevard; thence South 42 .93 feet to the true point of beginning of this description. PP.RCEL II: part of the Southeast quarter of Section 35, Township 1 South, Range 1 West of the Willamette Meridian, in the County of Washington and State of Oregon, and described as follows: Beginning at an iron pipe which is North 2' 03 ' East 499 . 27 feet from the Southwest corner of the Stott Donation Land Claim; thence from said iron pipe and true point of beginning North 88° 00 ' West 209 .78 feet to an iron pipe on the Easterly line of a proposed roadway; thence continuing North 88' 00 ' West 25 . 0 feet to an iron pipe; thence North 2� 55 ' East 186 .8 feet to an iron pipe; thence South 88� 00 ' East 25 . 0 feet to an iron pipe on the Easterly line of the aforesaid road area; thence continuinc� South 88 ` 00 ' East 206 . 88 feet to an iron pipe; thence South 2 03 ' West 186 .8 feet to the point of beginning. � ��', Continued on next page � � .;�; ; - . -2-- .-; --�..._.�_�y...� , Order No. 94090402-W PARCEL III : The South one half of the following described tract, in Section 35, Township 1 South, Range 1 West, of the Willamette Meridian, in the County of Washington and State of Oregon, described as follows: Beginning at an iron pipe which is North 2� 03 ' East 686. 07 feet from the Southwest corner of the Thomas A. Stott Donation Land Claim; thence from said iron pipe and true point of beginning; thence North 88� 00 ' West 206. 88 feet to an iron pipe on the Easterly line of a proposed roadway; thence continuing North 88' 00 ' West 25 . 0 feet to an iron pipe; thence North 2° 55 ' East 189 . 25 feet to an iron pipe; thence �South 88� 00 ' East 25 . 0 feet to an iron pipe on the Easterly line of aforesaid road area; thence continuing South 88� 00 ' East 203. 96 feet to an iron pipe; thence South 2� 03 ' West 189 . 25 feet to the point of beginning. �r 1 .�—� , STATE OF OREGON l SS County of Washington I I, Jerry R. Hanson, Director of Assess- ment and Taxation and Ex-Officio County Clerk for said county, do hereby certify that the within instrument of writing was received and recorded in book of records of said county. 1`�� Jerry R. Hanson, Director of Assessment and Taxation, Ex- Officio County Clerk Doc : 97085691 Rect: 194148 91. OU 09/15/1997 03: 15: 50pm � -3 � FOpM No.?87-SPECIAL WAqRANiv DEEO ��1 O!CO�POfl1l�. COWRIOMT IB9J 'ENS�NESS lAW PUBLi5MIN0 CO,POPiLANO�OR 9RW II NA I - ('ll� � SPECIAL WARRANTY OEED ``n�' � � KNOW ALL MEN BY THESE PRESENTS, That....Michael J....Nedelisky I ° � � -- �� --•- � -�- - ....,hereinafter called granfor, -- -- ....._ � - - - -..... ......... ......... . �; for the consideretion hereinatter stafed,does hereby grant,barBain,se11 and convey unfo.................................................... � .Bra}imapremananda__Ashrama, an Oregon non-profit corporation �U} herei»after ce/led Qrantee, and unto�rantee's heirs,successors and assi$ns a!l of that certain real properfy with the 0� tenements,hereditaments and appurfenarlces thereunto belongin�ot in any way appertainin�,sifueted in the County JI/y of_..Washington .___�State of Ore�on,described as follows,to-wit: .... .......... 1_;�� iiSee Legal Description attached and made a part hereof � i ** Continued from below: $47,913.58, plus other good and valuable consideration. I i I. i it'i � WASHINGTON COUNTY ty : � � REAL R40PERTY TRANSF£R TAX �' : Hg,oo �•/s• 97 I ' � � �' FE£ PAID DATE � pF SPACE INSUFFICIENi,CONTINUE DESCRIPTION ON REVERSE SIDE� i� To Have and to Hold the same unfo fhe grantee and�ranfee's herrs,successors and assigns forever. And the granfor hereby covenants to and with the grantee and grantee's heirs,successors and assigns that the teal � , property is free from encumbrances created or suffered thereon by grantor and that grantor will werrant and defend � i the same and every part and parcel thereof egainst the lawful c/aims and demands of al!persons claiming by,throu�h, I; ; or under ffie granfor. The true and actusl consideration paid for this transfer, sfated in terms of dol/ars, is,}`*._See Above I ---......... I'I �1xtt�e�ca�w�xx�R�a�x,�€ a�xx�x�xv�xx��xary�cacaca�xx�x�w�caz�,xa�x�€xxa��c�c II ��°��4K1G2�X��#,'�(�}i�1�EX7�JFX3F�6�j7tdi�7�G�I1�i�6iG�F1f�6�JkX�iYc�( ,�r`b��i��Y#�$�8.�j i �� In construin� this deed, where fhe contezt so requires, the sinQul i ludes the,plure/and all gremmatical ! changes shall be made so that this deed shall apply equa]/r t � r orat' s a d individua/s. i'i In Witness Whereof, the grantor has executed fhis i str n ' .. 7.. : da ....Augusi..................19.J.7...; � '� if a corporate �rantor, it has caused its name to be signe a fs e 'f a fix by an olficer or other person duly authorized thereto by order of its board of directors. THIS INSTRUMEN?WILL NQf ALLOW USE OF THE PROPERTY DESCRIBED IN THIS - '"' ' " """" `"` `""""""' INSTRUMENT IN VIOLATION OF APPLICABLE LAND USE LAWS AND REGULATIONS. Mi e 1 J. e lisky BEFORE SIGNING OR ACCEPTING THIS INSTRUMENT,THE PERSON AC�UIRING FEE TITLE lO THE PROPEFiTY SHOULD CHECK WITH THE APPROPFIATE CITY 0R COUNTY � "' "' ""'""-""""" " " """"" ""` ' " "" ' PLANNING DEPARTMENT 1D VERIFV APPROVED USES AND 1D�EiERMINE ANY LIMITS ON LAWSUITS AGAINST FARMING OR FOREST PRACTICES AS DEFINED IN ' ORS30930. ----��---.....°°--°°°°---°....................._................................. ............ STATE OF OREGON,County of......Clackamas �ss I i This instrument was acknowled�ed before me on..._.._.August 21_ Ig 97 I , by..............�----�MICHAEL J,._.NEDELISKY----------�--........_.............. -�- ....-�---...._.....................------..... � j� This insfrvment was acknowledged before me on..........................._._.......................,19...._..., „ � by---------------------••••-----------�---........------�-------�--•............-� -- --------•------.................-�-------•------............_......... iHs---�-��---- ----�.............--------------�----....•- •------- --------........... .......----..._.....---�--.....---..............-•--------.............. of---------�--�-°---°�----------------�----�------------ -� .......-�--- ----. .. -��---- .......................-..--.-.-°°-....---.. �,' OFFICIAL SEAI � � ' ne ROER�L COCHEU " � _.. .- ........ ........� --- -- �M�......°--- -................. I'I NOTARY PUHUGOREGON � , �� Notary Public tor Oregon '' ! '6''d IS CON EXPI ES SEPJ4Z�66999 My commrssion expires......9/.27.L.9�. �� Michael J.___Nede_lisky______________ STATE OF OREGON, °--• -....... ---- - �---� ------- 1 ss. i .....�. ..... ...................- - -- .....---------°-- Covnty of.... -- ��--_....... - �-�--1 •---�- -- ---�� -�� --��---- ----��-------�----�---�-�-�- I cerfify fhat the withrn instrvmenf G�an�er'�Nnm�aed Addr�n was received for record on the..........day , Srahmapxemananda..Ashsaaia-- ------------------� -- of---.._.... ..- -- --.,19........,at ----�-- __ �-- .._.._- -- - -•-° ---�-�-- .........°- o'clock..._..M.,and recorded in � -- . - -- _...-�.. .... ............ 600k/reel/volume 1Vo.. � - .....on page �i Grann�'�Nam•ond Addrns erncc neeertveo `o" .................. and/or as fee/file/instru- I� Ah��ncerdinq nlvm le(Nom�.Addnf{,Zlp�: RECORDER'e Ua[ '''' -- �� Brahmapremananda Ashrama ment/mrcrofilm/reception No.................. �---... I; _11515..SW Hall Slvd Record of Deeds of said County, .................. _..._... .------- - Tigard., OR 97223 Witness my hand and seal of u�m,.q�..�.d mhnwlw�rnd oll for rtaNm�nh te(Nom�,Addrw�.ZIpI: COIlAfj' afFixed. I'� Same...as directl above .... ... .................Y .. .. ...........--- -�---............. � -�.............��---------.............-•----._...�--............... � ......"""'"'""""'......."""'""""""'....."'.........................""""'"""'"' NAMC I � TITL[ � ....."_""'"........_'""""'............................""""""...."'_"""""""" B Y---- ................. ....................Deputy - - - � �. ' � LEGAL DESCRIPTION A TR.ACT COMPRISED OF PART OF THE LAND DESCRIBED IN DEED RECORDED AUGUST 10, 1995, FEE N0.95055808, RECORDS OF WASHINGTON COUNTY, OREGON, SITUATED IN THE SOUTHEAST QUARTER OF SECTION 35, TOWNSHIP 1 SOUTH, RANGE 1 WEST, WILLAMETTE MERIDIAN, IN THE CITY OF TIGARD, WASHINGTON COUNTY, OREGON, MORE PARTICULARY DESCRIBED AS FOLLOWS: COMMENCING AT THE SOUTHWEST CORNER OF THE THOMAS A. STOTT DONATION LAND CLAIM N0. 53; THENCE NORTH 2°03'00" EAST, A DISTANCE OF 780.39 FEET TO THE SOUTHEAST CORNER OF SAID TRACT DESCRIBED IN DEED RECORDED AS FEE N0.95055808; THENCE ALONG TAE SOUTH LINE OF SAID TRACT NORTH 87°57'O1" WEST, A DISTANCE OF 50.00 FEET TO THE "POINT OF BEGINNING"; THENCE LEAVING SAID SOUTH LINE NORTH 2°03'00" EAST, A DISTANCE OF 37.38 FEET; THENCE NORTH 49°06'23" WEST, A DISTANCE OF 91.68 FEET TO THE NORTH LINE OF SAID TRACT DESCRIBED IN DEED RECORDED AS FEE N0. 95055808; THENCE ALONG SAID NORTH LINE 87°58' 19" WEST, A DISTANCE OF 107.57 FEET TO THE NORTHWEST CORNER OF SAID TRACT; THENCE ALONG THE WEST LINE OF SAID TRACT SOUTH 2°57' 13" WEST, A DISTANCE OF 94.86 FEET TO THE SOUTHWEST CORNER OF SAID TRACT; THENCE ALONG THE SOUTH LINE OF SAID TRACT SOUTH 87°57'Ol" EAST, A DISTANCE OF 180.47 FEET TO THE "POINT OF BEGINNING". 3 . After Recording Return To: T.A.Sherwoad,Esq. Suite 203 16325 SW Boones ferry Rd. Lake Oswego,OR 97035 CERTIFIED TO BE A TRUE AND EXACT COPY OF THE ORIGINAL TR NATI N,TITLE INS. C0. . � . •� Q� BY _ RECIPROCAL LICENSE FOR PARKING EFFECTED BY AND BETWEEN Brahmapremananda Ashrama, which took title as Brahma Premananda Ashram, an Oregon non•profit corporation, herein called "First Party"and Michael J. Nedelisky, herein called"Second Party". RECITALS: A. First Party is the owner af the land situated in Section 35,Tawnship 1 South,Range 1 West of the Willamette Meridian, in the City of Tigard, County of Washingtan and State of Oregon, more particularly described at Exhibit A annexed hereto and by this reference incorporated herein as if fully set forth,herein called the"Temple Property",and B. Second Party is the owner the land situated in Section 35,Township 1 Sauth,Range 1 West of the Willamette Meridian, in the City of Tigard, County of Washington and State of Oregon, more particularly described at Exhibit B annexed hereto and by this reference incorporated herein as if fully set forth,herein called the"Office Property",and C. The Temple Property and the Office Property are situated contiguous with each other and share a common means of vehicular and pedestrian access and egress ta and from the public roadway known as S.W.Hall Boufevard(County Road No.947),and D. The Temple Property is committed ta use by the First Party as the site and location of buildings and related improvements, including spaces and facilities for parking of passenger motar vehicles, designed and intended to provide a gathering place and residence for persons engaged in the teaching,observance and practice of certain religious,ethical and philosophical principals shared by andlor of interest to those persons. E. The Office Property is committed to use 6y Second Party as the site and location of buildings and related improvements, including spaces and facilities for parking of passenger motor vehicles,suitable for use as office facilities,space and accommodations employed for the conduct of business and commercial activities of ane or more parties in ownership or tenancy of the Office Property, their employees,customers,patrons,clients,suppliers,service providers and business invitees,and F. The uses to which the Temple Property and the Office Property are committed by the respective parties, each require that persons having reason to 6e present on said properties will have space in which to park and leave motor vehicles unattended while such persons are engaged in residence or otherwise present on such properties in cannection with the uses to which they are committed by the parties as aforesaid,and G. The parties acknowledge that the spaces and facilities provided for parking of motor vehicles on their respective properties may, from time-to-time, but at different times, prove to be inadequate to accommodate the number of vehicles which require space for parking in connection with uses of the buildings and improvements located thereon,and H. The parties desire and intend to pool or share their available parking spaces and facilities to the end that adequate parking will he available for all persons who may now or hereafter have reasona6le cause or need to park motor vehictes in or upon the Temple Property or the Office Property, THEREFORE, in consideration of the foregoing recitals and the rights and responsibilities of the parties established hereunder, it is here6y, acknowledged,confirmed and agreed as follows: RECIPROCAL LICENSE PAGE 1 of 3 1. License Granted First Party. Second Party does hereby and irrevocably give, grant and convey to First Party, its successors in interest and assigns, license to permit parking of lawfully licensed and operational motor vehicles designed and actually used for the purpose of transporting passengers to and from any buildings or ather improvements now or hereafter erected on the Temple Property. The license afforded under this paragraph extends to all and any unoccupied exterior spaces or areas situated on the Office Property which are regularly designated and used or available for parking of mator vehicles of the kind mentioned above between the hours of 6:00 o'clock P.M.and 6:00 o'clock A.M.on weekdays Monday through Thursday and between the haur of 6:00 o'clock P.M. each Friday through the hour of 6:00 o'clock A.M. the next following Monday morning. The license afforded hereunder shall not supersede restrictions on parking imposed by public authorities, or which may be otherwise established or required by Second Party for purposes of facilitating, affording or reserving space for parking,use,access,egress or maneuvering of delivery,waste removal or emergency vehicles. 2. License Granted Second Party. First Party does hereby and irrevocably give, grant and convey ta Second Party, his successors in interest and assigns, license to permit parking of lawfully licensed and operational motor vehicles designed and actually used for the purpose of transporting passengers to and from any buildings or other improvements now or hereafter erected on the Office Property. The license afforded under this paragraph extends to all and any unoccupied exterior spaces or areas situated on the Temple Property which are regularly designated and used or available for parking of motor vehicles of the kind mentioned above between the hours of 6:00 A.M.and 6:00 P.M.each weekday,Monday through Friday,inclusive.The license afforded hereunder shall not supersede any restrictions on parking imposed by pu6lic authorities, or which may 6e otherwise established or required 6y First Party for purposes of facilitating,affording or reserving space for parking of delivery or emergency vehicles. 3. Additional licenses Permitted;Limitation. Nothing contained in this instrument shall be deem ar construed to limit or impair the right or prerogative of either First Party or Second Party to, from time•to-time,grant or afford to the other party, or to the other party's permittees,written license or permission to use some portion or all of such party's parking facilities or spaces at times,ar for purposes,different from or in addition to those times and purposes expressly licensed hereunder on such terms and conditions as such party may, in the exercise of its sole discretion, determine Iherein called "Temporary License"). Provided, hawever, that any Temporary License may be revoked or modified in any respect or particular in the sole and unfettered discretion of the party affording the same at any time upon delivery or posting of written notice to the other party or to any third party or parties to whom such Temporary License or permission may have been afforded. All persons or entities who shall avail themselves of any rights or prerogatives afforded under any Temporary License shall be conclusively deemed to have exercised any rights or prerogatives exercised 6y such persans or entities under color of such Temporary License and shall not, hy reason of such exercise, have,claim or be deemed to have acquired, any rights, or title or interest in the premises affected by such exercise, by prescription, adverse possession or under any other principle or rule whatsoever whether cognizable at law or in equity. 4. Notice of Licenses. The licenses afforded he�eunder may be exercised only by persons ta wham permission is granted by the respective licensees. First Party and Second Party will therefore,each and respectively, provide,or cause to be furnished,to all and any persons ta whom such permission is granted,written evidence of such permission in a form which such persons may display upon or within their vehicle4s) in such a manner as to be readily visible from the exterior thereof. Each party hereby acknowledges and agrees that the other party, or its tenants or others lawfully entitled to occupy such party's property or any portion�s)thereof, shall have the unqualified right and prerogative to remove any vehicle parked on such party's property which does not display evidence it is parked with permission in accordance with the foregoing provisions of this paragraph. 5. Disclaimer of Liability. Neither First Party nor Second Party shall be liable to the other or to any third party or parties whomsoever,for any loss,damage or injury of any kind or nature whatsoever incurred ar suffered by any person,personal property or any vehicle while present on such party's property by reason of the licenses granted hereunder, regardless of the cause of such loss, damage or injury. Each party hereby covenants and agrees with the other that it will post notice and otherwise inform all persons who may now or at any time hereafter avail themselves of any right or license provided hereby, that by entering on such party's property for any purpose, such persons assume all risk of loss, damage and injury to themselves, any vehicle owned, operated or parked by or for the benefit of such person, and any other personal property brought upon or left of such party's property by or for the benefit of such person. 6. Duration;Parties Baund and Benefited. The license granted to First Party hereunder shall remain in effect for so long as the Temple Property shall be and remain committed to the uses set forth in Recital D of this instrument. The license granted to Second RECIPROCAL LICENSE PAGE 2 of 3 . - Party hereunder shall remain in effect for so long as the Office Property shall be and remain committed to the uses set forth in Recital E of this instrument. Should either license afforded hereunder expire by reason of the foregoing provisions of this paragraph, such expiration shall nat in any way affect,diminish ar impair the rights afforded under the other license afforded hereunder. The licenses afforded hereunder and the terms and conditions herein contained shall run with the lands affected thereby and shall bind and inure to the benefit of the First Party and the Second Party,their respective heirs,successors in interest,assigns and all other persons now or at any time hereafter having or claiming any right,title or interest in their respective properties by reason af any tenancy arrangement, lien or other encumbrance whatsoever. IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the parties have each caused this instrument to be executed and acknowledged effective on the latest date set forth 6elow. BRAHMAPREMANANDA ASHRAMA, an Oregon non-prafit corporation, First�'arty MICHAEL J.NEDELISKY,Second Party BY - Swami Viswa Premananda,President � By ��ns� � Bharat Naik,Secretary State of Oregon, County of L � �,S } s.s. This instrument was acknawledged before me on� ° , 2 1997, 6y SWAMI VISWA PREMANANDA as President of Brahmapre nda Ashrama,a re�on non•p it corparation. OFFICIAL SEAL Notary Public for Oregon BROOKELAHMAN ! NQTARY PUBLIC-OfiEGON My Commission Expires � COMMISSION N0.054835 . MY COMM�SSION EXPIRES JUNE 03,200C� � State of Oregan, County of � '^ ^ } s.s. This instrument was acknowledged before me on Z�p , 1997, by Bharat Naik as Secretary of Brahmapremananda Ashram an Oreg n non-pro cqrporation. OFFICIAL SEAL BROOKE L.AFIwuN tary Pu61ic for Oregon :�' NOTARY PUBLIC-OREGON My Commissian Expires UC MY COMMISS ON EXpIRE3 J�U�fVE�� ppp State af Oregon, County of } s.s. This instrument was acknowledged befare me on , 1997, by Michael J. Nedelisky. Natary Public for Oregon My Commission Expires RECIPROCAL LICENSE PAGE 3 of 3 . s � c N � c�r s ti� � �/�12� �� cL � �/s'/,�'" sc,� �/,g� ��- v� N��`�3 hb�-ho-�.J� M.�.�•'� �l�_ � S� �.- � G��, � �.-- ��-�----- ��y/�� 1 v �` ti-�' 1 L � 1 ' 1� �� ,�'.�Zl/-tik ��'L�.�U��"L.' � �ouip�y�� I�ccrr� �j�i"� R. d- o �;�o � wI�O v� M �- � � � 1 Nc�� /�� s r�`� N�};,.,� r�� }-�.� �_ �'1�- e�. M,�.s � 11��,c,�-y�c,y S- ; � ��-�.�--��c�-, � `�'�.� � ^�� t-� �C2 I..1n-�.- �V�,�,7 �.s� �s � .�2ea"2-s G��.. v� . � r�� L�� s � �z�.�l �� t-,�,�.��, ��- � �� -� e�-, s� t,�iot S '''v<J � s�.�/�o'C�J�\/ti°� � / �.��z� j�,� �� f�.� I,�.� I��l�, ��,..��.1.�� .1- c-t,�-;��- s h�=� �,,�.J v�.t,�,.�.1- �1 r� ��i UtS/18/�Jri 1'U� 14: 'LS N3., SU3"L'LU2i�S44 UH�I,Ui�I '111'1.� t�JUUl � lie0lge 8L I.dllf�E�RCgail 3801 NW Loriann Dr C��dt Mary Jean Brazil on o,.__ ,,.,. . Clsr�,.,.o �. ,,.., — 1'O�[('�Q,Uti 97229 _ -- ••vn a.�WM "'•�••:j r�+aia L1JLll Tigard, OR 97281 PO Box 23064 TiRard,OR 9'72gt L N 1'RUPERTLES L L C ]2725 SW 66th Ave L N PROPERTIE,S LLC 12725 Sw��k;�� Keiko Pan¢ °v:�tauui,vii y7123 4(-442 Hololio St Portland, OR 97223 Kaneohe,fII 96744 �erome Parker Timo�thy McLoughiin&i{yvonne 99 Garibaldi St 54pn SW �9strh e�� AndnW He►berholz�L Fiorenrp �-ai�c v,wego, UR 97035 9620 SW 90th Avc Aloha, OR 97007 Portland,�R 97223 Tommy Henry Neberi&E Susan M:utha Huckett 1 l530 SW Lomita Ave Linda Bouse&John Bouse ?`igard, OR 97223 <<S02 SW Lu�.i*�;�e 11470 SW Lomita Ave Tigard,UR 97223 Tigard, OR 97223 Richard Muzray&Lowana Donald iv�an d�Maiv Looftwurow 11440 SRl Lomita Ave I2410 SW Lomita Ave G�'B��ord Tigard, Ok y�Z23 Portland, OR 9�223 305 E Sth St The Dalles, OR 97058 KINDER-CARE LEARNITiG CNTRS�C L N PROPERTIES LLC Estate Tax Rea1 Ashrama Brahrt�apremananda 1�77 NE Loop 410#1250 12�25 SW 66th Ave 12515 SW Ha11 Blvd San Anwnio,TX 78217 portland,OR 97223 Tigard, OR 97223 08;18i98 TUE 11:19 FAX 50322088�l�1 pREGUN TITLE (�002 , YOUNG'S FCTNERAT.HOME INC YOUNG'S FUNERAL HOME INC Nams Olson 11831 SW Pacific Hwy 11831 SW Pacific Hwy 117�SW Warner Ave Tigard,OR 97223 1`igard,OR 97223 Tigard,OR 97223 Norris alfred Olson&Ann Kathleen Sanokee Ray Alben�Ioffarbcr 11740 SW Warncr Ave 45 From St S#B 12005 SW Hall Blvd I'igard, OR 97223 Issaquah,WA 98027 Tigar�OR J7223 EQUIl.ON ENTFRPRISES LLC SPxEKER PROPERTIES L P AMAN ENTERPRISES INC PO Box 4453 2180 Sand I�'ill Rd#20t► PO Box 19(>8� Ho�ston,TX 71210 Mento Park,CA 94025 Portland,OR 9728�► • 08/14/98 11:i19 $5U3 684 i297 c:�IT� OF TIGARU lQJ0o2iu03 J Abdullah Alkadi �� , 11905 SW 125th Court 11035 SW 135th Avenue � Tigard, OR 97223 T9�� 97�3 Cai Wooiery Kathie ICallio 12356 SW 132nd Court 12940 SW Glscier Lily Drive � Tgard, OR 57223 Tigard.OA 97223 Sue Rortnan Ed Howden ' 11250 SW 82nd Avenue ��g2g SW Momi�g Hill . Tigarcl.OR 97223 Tigard, OR 97223 Bonne 8�Jim Roach Christy Herr 14447 SW Twekesbury Drive - 11386 SW Iranwood Loop Tigard� OR 97?24 ' Tgard. OR 97223 Ka�i Swanson Larry Westerman 1141U SW i�onwood loap . , �3665 SW Fem Street Tigard, 4R 97223 Tgard;OR 97223 C�9 �P�� Gark G.Zeller . 743a SW Vams Street 13290 SW Shore Drive . Tigard. OR 9?223 'T"�gard, OR 97223 Scott Russell ��g� 31291 Raymond Creek Road 17245 SW Morgen Court . Scappoose, OR 97056 Tigard,OR 97223 June SuFffrid e � 15525 SW 109th Avenue 15849 SW 146th Avenue , Tlgard, OR 97224 Tigard.OA 97224 Linda Masters Beverly Froude - 1512U SW 141st Avenue 12200 SW Butl Mountain Fioad . Tigard, OR 97224 Tiga�d,OR 97224 John Benneth Kathy Smith 15550 SW 109th Avenue 11645 SW Cloud Court , � Tigard, OR 97224 Tigard.OR 97224 � 08-1�%98 11:09 $503 68:� i297 CITY OF TIGl1RU �00�%'003 , Mark F. Mahon Pat W yden 11310 SW 91 st Court 8122 SW Spruce Street Tigard, OR 97223 Tigard,OA 97223 h:�patty�masterslcitnotic.lbs 6-Jut-98 . �,�� As� �Qyu . , SAMUEL&JANET HOLMES CLARENCE&�1ARY JEAN BRAZIL MICHAEL NEDELISKY 12215 SW 33Rd Ave PO Box 2306-t 25 82Nd Dr Por[land, OR 97219 Tigard, OR 97281 Gladstone, OR 97027 KAULUWAI CORPORATION OB�MEDIA CORP PREMANANDA ASHRAM BRAE-Ilv1A 2445 Makiki Heights Dr#A 4211 W 11Th Ave 11515 SW Hall Blvd Honolulu, F-II 96822 Eugene,OR 97402 Tigard, OR 97223 ASHRAMA BRAHMAPREMANANDA HARRY SCHAFFER&E Lillian M KENNETH BROYLES &A Jennie 11515 S W Hall Blvd 11245 S W 90Th Ave 11260 S W 90Th Ave Tigard,OR 97223 Tigard, OR 97223 Tigard,OR 97223 ROBERT&ROSE HEINTZ BRENT MCTAGGART STEPHEN FREEDMAN&Candace Arch 11275 SW 90Th Ave PO BoY 231207 11300 SW 90'fh Ave Tigard, OR 97223 Tigard,OR 97281 Tigard,OR 97223 BILLY JACOBY&J Valerie ALICIA&RICHARD VICE MARTIN NIARIA JLTNG 11325 SW 90Th Ave 11375 SW 901"h Ave 11400 SW 90Th Ave Tigard, OR 97223 Tigazd,OR 97223 Tigard,OR 97223 NANCY&RONALD HEITZ MATTHEW FORI�IAN& A Kathleen C KENT&LISA POWLOSKI 11401 SW 90Th Ave 11403 SW 90Th Ave 11405 SW 90Th Ave Tigard,OR 97223 Tigard,OR 97223 Tigard, OR 97223 HAROLD WORSECH&K Sandra WII.,LIAM&STEPHAME SNYDER THOMAS Bc DORIS DOLL 11450 SW 90Th Ave 11480 SW 90Th Ave ll500 SDV 90Th Ave Tigard,OR 97223 Tigard,OR 97223 Tigard, OR 97223 BEHROOZ&SHEII.A ANSARI DEANNA MARIE QUII..LEN ALAN&SOOK I-IEE BAXT'ER 11540 SW 90Th Ave 11560 SW 90Th Ave 11650 SW 90'fh Ave Tigard, OR 97223 Tigard, OR 97223 Tigard, �R 97223 DOREEN GRIGG BONNIE&NORMAN ALANDER DON GRAHAM&Paul Brossia 11700 SW 90Th Ave PO Bos 2619 11260 SW Hall Blvd Tigard, OR 97223 White City,OR 97503 Tigard,OR 97223 MARGARET ANN BROWN PAUL BROSSIA&Don Graham LN PROPERTIES LLC 19065 SW Johnson St 300-�Th St 11�75 SW Hall Blvd Beaverton, OR 97006 Lake Oswego,OR 97034 Tigard,OR 97223 _ � L N pROPERTIES LLC KINDER-CARE LEARNING CNTRS INC KEIKO PAI�1G 12725 SW 66Th Ave Estate Tax Real �6--G�2 Hololio St Portland, OR 97223 1777 NE Loop�10#12�0 Kaneohe, HI 967=�-t San Antonio,TX 78217 GERALD &JOAN CACH ANNA SAYLER MILTON BROWN 1252� SW Main St PO Bos 23757 2106 SE Ochoco St Tigard, OR 97223 Tigard, OR 97281 Milwaukie, OR 97222 RAY BARNETT&Mabel Amos SHr�.WN ROBERTS ELEANOR SCHLAGER&Diana Ashbur PO Box 230025 11635 SW Hall Blvd#8 11635 SW Hall Blvd#1 Tigard, OR 97281 Tigard, OR 97223 Tigard, OR 97223 CHA.RLES MENDEL&J Winifred ROBBIN KAY HALL SOLIS JACINTO iJLUAN&Mae Rachell 11635 SW Hall Blvd#5 11635 SW Hall Blvd#3 11635 SW Hall Blvd#10 Tigard, OR 97223 Tigard, OR 97223 Tigard, OR 97223 CORRINE NIELIUS& Cathv Lee Price STEVEN PHII.LIPS JOE-Q�1 PALJL LAWSON JR. 11635 SW Hall Blvd#14 11635 SW Hall Blvd#11 11635 SW Hall Blvd#15 Tigard, OR 97223 Tigard, OR 97223 Tigard. OR 97223 ROLAND CHRISTENSEN RAY HA.ROLD BARNETT cYc Mabel Amos SFu'�1ANTHA WRIGHT-VOSIKA 11635 SW Hall Blvd#17 PO Box 230U25 Brvon Keith Johnson T'igard, OR 97223 Tigard, OR 97281 1163� SW Hall Blvd#18 Tigazd, OEt 97223 KAREN 1v�EHAN NANCY STEELE GARY BRADFORD 11635 SW Hall Blvd#9 11660 SW Hall Blvd 305 E �T'h St Tigard, OR 97223 Tigard, OR 97223 The Dalles, OR 97058 SEAN&JUSTINE VIRMG DONAL.D IVAN&MARY LOOFBOURO ELIZABETH COSHOW Ove&Den Arvidson 11-�10 SW Lomita Ave 11�25 SW Lomita Ave 11�05 SW Lomita Ave Portland, OR 97223 Tigard, OR 97223 Tigard, OR 97223 RICHARD MURRAY&Lowana CLIFFORD &CYNTHIA BERGER LINDA BOUSE&John Bouse 11�40 SW Lomita Ave 11�1» SW Lomita Ave 11-170 SW Lomita Ave Tigard, OR 97223 Tigard, OR 97223 Tigard, OR 97223 JEFFREY HLJGHES &Jo Bare Tami MARTf-IA HOCKETT APPLETON PROPERTIES INC 11�85 SW Lomita Ave 1 li02 SW Lomita Ave 7100 SW Hampton St#103 Tigard, OR 97223 Tigard, OR 97223 Tigard, OR 97223 TO1VIIvtY f-IENRY NEBERT&E Susan DAVID & BETTY FITZPATRICK ANDREW E-�RBERHOLZ&L Florence 11530 SW Lomita Ave 761� SW Chestnut St 9620 SW 90Th Ave Tigard, OR 97223 Tigard, OR 97223 Portland, OR 97223 LARRY HERBERHOLZ T'IMOTHY MCLOUGHLIN&K Yvonne PING-JUI KAI WANG 9620 SW 90Th Ave 5-�00 SW 198Th Ave 22600 SW 93Rd Ter Por[land, OR 97223 Aloha, OR 97007 Tualatin, OR 97062 JEROI�PARKER FERN MACKINNON & Virginia Dale JA1VG&YON SOON OH 5320 SW Macadam Ave 11625 SW Lomita Ave 11630 SW Lomita Ave PoRland, OR 97201 Tigard, OR 97223 Tigard, OR 97223 DAVID &MARINA STARLING TIGARD PROPERTIES INC DAVID Eh1AMi 32 Independence Ave 2106 SE Ochoco St 3380 Barrington Dr Lake Grove, OR 9'7035 Milwaukie, OR 9`7222 West Linn, OR 97068 DONALD SCHAEFFER&Michael Munch PO Bos 82��9 Portland, OR 97282 �i 1�70 lY.U.J �tlJ�_ll ItJ7 aIHLLLt Lt51UN rq�jt b�` ?y� "' •` YSN-812H.a8' E ' �- �i awunc ��4� ��' ' ' �� r� e i '' 9,�a � �i HE s ' , � —�— _ � t25.es_ zzs.s�•� _ ,- � a��~�r _2<,s8' N B7'S8'�9' � I r 8M00'00' E) ° � �W � �`�J , �"�' V" .I NE 2 r.acE� u '�, �° ` �"� IM 1/Z C! � '^� 45055E 12 �a x r�c` � P 1 � :; � � � � � ��jjj�� 'o � ,r1 �! E � W ... . .� ...�.R.iD 3/�• �P . l /��' �A� � uv 0.1' ^ E]lIS71rG 71.is0 PJ O.U. � � _ �!7 SE.I!3 fd . . - .^ F�7j$�q�AOtE�RAC7S'.L[ME Of l0T �9 $ w ��47..0 �CSS�]06U . , l �� a c� — FALL9 ftW'D3'OS•Y-..I,Sp' � ir � � SS I/2 'C') � . � � - � . � 950S6d10 � - � . P►kCEL I I I �� - �9 v�• ivi o - 1 :3?..-�- " =N,07'-b8• 8a w - M ��'�' � �1NE 14 m Y29.97• (22i:86'1 -_ i;; ia�-'—~�� - . - _,�, M ersa•ia• r iFn�,• �ri �c�ie�oo•oo• F� 1; ` �. . .��. ' ' L 11iE s � �. � 6 �o M-s � � 8� �1, . . . � f�us Msr�se•»w-.a.�s �a� r � ' i�.s9�� PfaOf'OSFD ��:, a`- - s$ � L° 0 9.,,.' . s� E x �� PlIOPERTI' IINE " $ �,yg =g' ?�, \ �w ia • •� ST -Z.� ' '�e. Y3 2� 7s7� ;� �� ' v, TRACF f 9FE OETAII 2 ocisriMS esbsseoe N 02'GE'oo• E P4lIR OF BE61tlI�N6 SFEET 2 �L•FC sre• �a 12.92• � pN�PFRT(LilYc b�.�� '�:� � :�. . S.E..GORIIER IISDS59�11 �//�L.W UP M�ib 180.R' "°�.. . 'L2 'O.S.M.6.' "o. N e7'S)'Oi' f ' �. pp�0•1' iLLlS lul2'3B'24 �bO:�T' F�LLS 0.1�' S � ^` �� 0.0.0.T. s: E , 8 LIIiE 7 ' � �� `� o.ie� r ;^[w _ 4� ��' r _ . P�NCfI. 11 I �� .� � . H 95001189 r y:• : �.. - �,. . ... � fD 5/B' 4R ta in�•� " �i�� -�: . . OS':�'.=�-L.�1� 9'`J!: .. -a M Do.K o..• ai 21.T9J � � ; ..� . � . � � •1�p th5 s � t - ..� � � / '�l�e' �. FLL15 Sa9'W'0: - 1 ^� �i �/ .%\y' 0.0.0.T. 3��• �01 PaoPaSED ACLfSS EASEIEI(f ��., ' •Q•raELD w-5 � "� �'`? $ �' Fius wraa•os•r-o•za' 23 S . _ . .- � � 2a�.ss• cx3i.ee•i �.t_�('� � /� N�ya S�a• �a 0.fD P(pSTIC t+0.o � w erss•�Z' • cM a�oo•oo• c� �� S� � � � _,•��,,�, . / ^ / •�,, iwc• �� 4 g, . , .�. ..� V k : to � q � o � � � s � . ; :,µ ��., .. p� . . �" y-e.� -�,_:_s �a� . TMCT 2 �i :t� , � ---�-�-=-- ssoo�ie�:'°`�'� ," ` � ,�• E °' fXlSifw6 75 �OQ� �— — 8� `:'_ . ri.:��!21 ^�7 ! � e -- �so,astdP � s w�si•da• E aw_rs•> LINE l 1 ^ � ,� f E2 M1 � � I 23 �� . , � s ` s.� " _. 290.52' � ;� y S� � PnA[fL i� ! ,;; M lY0.1'06�r o� : 0 9saoi+sa 1 Fo u2• �r LINE 12 0 _ �,f,� I $ � •Q��0.2' �n �'� w" IR1 � I a,. . � ` CS'3pep � � $ � ��N�� ° N . � os• E I - t_ 9£E D£TAIL 3 - " L l t!IE. 14 ` . ► 9FEE7 2 � ,.. l2l�.7)'> '. :� Llt� 3 � :, N!i'S1'St•� UNE 13 20�.oo• � �- � oo.r o.i• � 'P'r�o �-s za�•so' r��.7��s Fws�ers�•s+��-o.ar• / � N Q'S'�'19'• f N M'M'M• cl� � , � � . � �� ✓ ^ _ ( . ... yJ�7 c��F� �� y`� {3 LD � \� ` �� \ �SEvF�L �Es� /� �2 I L � �� - !� � rRoPdSE� � I��,�N( V��/�1 T� 1�A�FL� � � �l�S E nn�NT � ExisnN� t�hvasc,g�� _ � NousE � h��vER F i - - - c,+►-Q.0 g v i�,D r N G- ta PPo PC3 E� P�o pcs E.fl r .� �vru�_ ! �9 C � Sctierw,� �c St� Plo,� �N�� S�-1c� a'�.F►„�� ,,,��►.,�t�, �w��.•�,�, �T��I� Apr-09-99 06 = 33A P _ O1 M � � � � � � f+OMES ING. .... . . 'Vf�"t�:a.w.�'.,..-.w........._.«.............�... .�!..!�:�«s«�aw....e..Y.��'�;'.`.'....,�-w w:�...>...a.......,...........�K..w<:ow .. r,,..e sw....,,.......�...... "��-".."" 9801 SE wesN�ew Ct Portfand. Or 97266-6968 � Phone: 503 - 658-2767 F3x: 503 - 6S8��16 �`'�'"�-" � � _ < . . . _ . ,.��•� ��. � '' .D.��e, . ... . `.,-... : . --' . . ,. .. M , . ... .. _._ •--....... ::Send::`:�`o:�;" Q,;:�AX,�: tt�dtrt4 c�iieF) - ��o�j�i��= Mike Nedelisky � Pfease call our office if Transmissic ......... .:�..... . �.... �� ............ --•---..._��!!�_.._._..__.�-....... --••---..._..1----••- ---•-•---._...----•-- •••-•......... ..........•--• ........... �...-�.�--.....��_...�..............;......................... ............. ............... ...........f�..��i.... . .. ............................. ............. ................ � ................................... .�.�.......�......................................:... .................. .....................................� .. ..... .......... ........................ .....---........... .................._....._........................---....-------...........---..._............................................,..... ..-------�--------------------------------��--------�---------�-�---------�--.-..._........... ............. ..................... ---�..........................................---......._.........................._............. ......................._........ -�--.....--�....................................................................................................................... .................................................................................................................................�- Apr-09-99 06 - 33A p_ O2 ' StATE OF OREGON � � . . � � ��_..w��w��•.,., SS � .. �,d Afur Reeording Return To: �.��rry R. Hanson, Directaf of n�sess- ment and 7��allon and �x-0fFcio Counly ^ T.A.Sk�rwaad Fsa. Clerk for said couniy,do re�eby"certify �nat Su�t�2D] the within inetrumer��bf mlting was recoived 16325 SW Bmnss Ferry Ro. and rer.orGed in baok� Dt rpCOrd� ot aaid cou nty_ p�� Lake Oswega.OFi 97D35 . � Jerry R. Ha��son- Dirccto► ot ASSessmcnt and faxation, F:- Officio Gount}i Clerk Doc : 97U85693 Rect: 194148 53 . 09/15/1997 03: 15: Slpm RECIPROCAI UCENSE FOA PARKING EFfECTED BY ANO BETWEFN Brahmaprernananda Ashrama, which took title as Brahma Premananda Ashram, an Oregan non•profii carporation, herein caUed "First Party"and Michael J.Nedelisky,herein called "Second Party". RECITALS: A. Frst Party is the awner of tltie la��d situated'm Sectio�35,Township 1 South.Range 1 West of the Wtllamette Merirfian,in the . City of Tigard, Countr of Wasl�ington anA Stace of Oregoa, more particularly described at Frhibit Q annexed hereto and br tfiis reference incorparated herein as if fully set forch,herein called the'Temple Properry", and 8_ Secund Party is the awner the land situated'm Sectioo 35,Township 1 South.Range 1 West of the Walamette Meridan,in the City of Tiyard, County of Washington and State of Orego�, mo�e particularly described at frh�it B annexed hereto and by �his ro(erence incorparated herein as if full�set fortfi,herein called the"Offite Propertr",and -- C_ The Temple Property and il►e Office Property are situated contiyuans with each Qther and share a common mcans of vehicular and pedestrian access anE eflress to and from the public roadway known as S.W_HaU Boulevard{County Road Na.947).and D_ The Temple Property is committed to use by the First Party as the site and bcation oF 6uildings and related impcovements, includ�ng spaces and facilities for parking af passenger motor vehicles, designed ae►d intended tn provide a gadierinq place and residence far persons engaped in the teaching,ohserYance and practice ot eert�in teGgiaeu,ethical and philosophical prir�ci�als shared hy andfor of interest tn tlase persons. E. The office PropertY is �ommitted to use by Second Party as the site and Ixation of buddmgs and related improvcmcnts. including spaces and facilities for parking of passenger motor vehicles,suitable for use as office facilities, space and accamrnuda(ians emp{oyed fo�the cooduct o(busNiess and tomn�ercial activitias of o�e o�mora parties in ownership or tenancy af the Offico P�operty, their empla�rees,cusiorrurs,{�avons,c6ents,suppGers,senice p�oridecs and business invitees,and F. The uses to which the Ternple Pra��eny and the ��ce Property a�e committed by Lhe respective parties, each require that persans having reasort to be p�e�nt a� said propertiet w�ll have space in which ta park aad leave motnr vehicles unattended while such persons are engaged in residence or otherwise prese�t on such properties in coanection wich che uses [a which tfiey are committed hy the parties as aforesaid,and G. The parties acknowledge that tlie spaces a�id facilities prnvided fo�parking at motur vefticles on[heir►espective properties may, froin time•tn•time, but at different times, prove to be iaadequate to accummadato the numher of vehi�les wh�ch require spa�n Inr parking in connection with usos of the Uuildings and'unpraren�ents locaced thereoq and H. The parties desae and intend to pool ar share their available parking spaces and tacilities to tl�e end tliat adequace parking will be availa6le far all persans who may now or hereafter have reasonable cause or nee�to park mator vehicles in ar upon the Tempie Property ar the Offxe Properiy, �. THEREFORE, in conside�ation of the foregoing recitals and the rights and �esponsi6ilities of ihe parties establithed hereunde�, it is herehy. acknowledged,confirmed and agresd as follows: RFCIPROCAL LICElSE � � � PAGE 1 of 3 Apr-09-99 06 : 33A P _ 03 .,• . 1_ License Grsnted First PartY. Second PaRy daes herehy and i�revocably give, grant and�onvey to first Parcy,its successars in interest and asaigru, license to permit parking of Iawfully liceasc� and aperatianal mator vel�ictes designed and actuaQy used for -� the purpose of transporting passangcrs to and fram aay bu�dings or other improvemems now or hereafter erected on the Templc Praperty. The license attarded un�er this paragraph extends to all and aay unac�upied ezcerior spaces nr areas situated on the Office Property which are regu(arly designated and used or avalab{e for partcing aE mocor vohicles of ihe kind mentioned abore batween the haurs af 6:OU o'clotk P_M.and 6:00 o'clock A.M.on weekdays Monday through Thursday and hetween the hour oi 6:00 o'clock P.M. each Friday through tfie hour of 6:OU o'clock A_M_ the ne�ct following Monday maming. The C�cense aftorded f�crrunder shall not supersede restrictians on parking imposed by pubfic authorities,or wlrch may be otherwise estahlished or reyuired by Setond Party fof purpo5es of facilitating, affording or reaeroing space tor parking,use,access,egress nr maneuvering of delivery,waste removal or emergency vehicles_ 2 Licenss 6ranted Second Party. First Pa�ty does hereby and irrevocahly pive, grant and convey to Secnnd Party, hls successors in interest snd assigns, li�ense to permit parlcing of lawfully Gcensed and aperational motor vehicles designed and actually used fo�the purpose of transporting pas3enyers to an� from anY buildinQs or other improvements now or hereafter erected on the �ffice Property_ The ficerae a(tordod undcx this paragraph eiten�to atl�d any unnccupied e:terior spaces or areas situated on the Temple Property which are repularly designated and useG or available for parking of mator vehicles of the kind mentioned abov¢ between the haurs of 6:00 A.M.end 6:00 P.M.each weekday,MondaY througfi f�iday,inctusive.The G�ense affarded hereun�er shall nut supersede any resirictions on patkiny imposed by pub6c authorities, or which may be otherwise esta6fished or required by First PaRy fui Purposes of tac�7itatinp,affonlind or reserving space for parking of delivery or emergency vehicles. 3. Ad�itiotral Licenses Permittud;limitation. No�fling�ontained in this instrument shall be deem or censtrued to limit or impair the right or Preroqative oi either Fi�st PartY or Second Parry to,from dme-to-time,grant ar afford to the ocher parry, or tu the other party's permittees,writter►license or permission tn use some portion or all of such parry's parking faci6ties ar spaces at times,or for purposes,6tte�t f�an or in addRion to thnse txnes and purposes expressl1r licensed heretmder on such terms and�onditions as such party maY, in The exercise of its safe discretion. detecmine (fierein called "Temporary License'). Provided, however, that any Temporary License ntay 6e revoked or modified in any respect ar panicular in the sole and unfettered discretion of the party affording _ the same ai any time upon delivery or posting of writte� ro::ce to �� ciher party or to any tlird party a� paRies :o whnm such Temporary�License ar pertnission may Aave been affarded. All persons or ontities whe shall avail themselves of any ripi+u or premgatives affarded u�dor any 7emporary �i�ense shall be conclusivety deemed to have e�ercised any rights ar prero9ativos ezercised by such persom or entiries under color of such TempararY licenso and shall not, 6y reason of such exercise,fiave, claim or be deortwd to have acquired, any rights, or titie or interest in the premises affected bY such exercise, by prescription, adverse posses�ion or ia►der any other principle or rule whatsoever whe[her copn¢able at law or in equity. 4. Notiu of Licenses. The licenses affordeA hereunder may be exercised only by persons to whom permissinn is granted 6y the respective ficensees First Part}r and Second Party will therofote,each and respectively,provide,or cause to be fumished,rn all and any persau to whom such permi5sian is granted,wrrtten eride�ae uf such petmission�a ierm which such person5 may display upon or withi�[I1eir vehicte(s! in such a manner as ta be read�j risible from the e:tedor thereof. Each paRy here6y�acknowtedges and agrees tfiaE ihe other parry. o�its tenants or others lawfully entided tn acupy such paRy's property or any portion(s) thereaf, shall have the unqaalified right and prerogative to removs any vehicle pa►ked on such party's prapertr which does not Cisplay evidence it is parlced with permissioa in accordance with the faregoing provisrons of this paragraph. 5. Diselaimer af Liabiiity. Neither first Pa�ty nor Second Party shatl be liahle to the ather ar to any third partY or parties WhOfT1SGeV8f,for any loss,damage or injury of any kind or nature whatsoever incurred or suffered by any person,persnnal property ar any vehicle while present on such party's property bY reason of the licenses granted hereunde�.�egardless of the cause af such loss, damape or injury. Each party hereby covenants and agrees witli the nther that it will post notice ai�d otherwise inform all persons who may now or at aaY time hereafter avail themselves af an}r right or license ptorided hereby, that hy entering on such party's property fo� any purpose, such persons aswme atl risk of �oss, damage and injury to themselves, any vehicle owned, operatod or Pa�ked 6y or tor the bunefic of such porsun,and aey other pefsonal propertY brought upon or left af such party's property DY or lor the benefit of sach persun. 6. Duration;Psrties 6aund and Sanefited. The license grarrted ta First Party hereunde�shall remaia in effect(or so long as the `- Tempie Prnpem/shall be and remain commi[ted to the uses set fo�th in Recital D o(this instrument The license g�anted to Secand REtl�ROCAI LICElISE � PAGE 2 uf 3 Apr-09-99 06: 34A P. 04 r . Party hereunder shaA remain in effect fa sa Inng as the Of(icc ProQerry shan De artd romain cortxritted tn the uses set torth in Recital E of this instnurx:nt. Should either license aflordad hereund� expire br reason of the foregoing p�ovisions of tliis paragra��h, su�h --- ozpiration shall not in any way affect,d"uninish or impair the rights a(fordeC ander the other license aifonlcd hereunder. The ficenses afforded hereunder and the terms and conditions herein�ontaineE sliall run witfi the lands affectad tliercby and shal[6ind and inure to the benefit of the First PartY and�he Second Party, their respectiva I�e��,successors in interast,assigns and alf other persons now nr at any tuno hereafter having or claiming a�y rgfit,titie or interest in their respective propert� s by reason of any tenancy arranpeii�ent, Gen or other encumbrance whatsoevar. !": 'N!TlU�SS WNEREOF,tlm parties have each caused t i' in , � e�t e e t d and acknowledged effectrve on the latest date set forth below. 6HAHMAPREMANAAIDA ASHRAMA,an Oregon nan•profit corporation, First�arty L J.N IISKY, conG Party BY �� - _ Swami Viswa Premanar�de,President . By : Bharat Naik,Seuetary State of Oregvn,Caunty nf �. '� s.s_ This instrument was acfcnowledged before me on . 1 , 199y, by SWAMI V4SWA PRElU�ANANDA as Pre�ident ef Brahmapre nda Asbrama,a re�on nan•p it cnrporation. ��v=�L 5�'°� Nota Public fo�Ore an e�oo�E uMWw �1► 9 '''aT�aY�ue�r�-oaEOON My Commissian Expires � COIu1MISS10N N�.06:0.'.3 r r 1tY COMMtSS10N DcP1RES�UtdE C3,2ppp � ,. r� State of Q�egan,County of u�(,(,�(��(,�/�/((�} s.s, ii'u iDSuwTiciii raJ ai.iii�unicuycu ucsv'i8 T'il�C Gil 2� . ;oo�� 6y 8harat Naik as Secretary af Brahmapremananda A:hra�n Oreg�9n non-pro�i c rporation. � OfFIClA�SEA� , M�OKE�}��!�V tary Puhlic for Oreaon r � + �'. NOTAqYP�lgL1C-pqEfl�N � My Commission ExpaeS u��j'2�_ ' COMMI$SIOr+I N0.4S�16 —�-T IMT COAIMt55lON EJCPIf1E5 JUNEr}�,xmn S*.�!s �f Ors;�n, r_Ln??�9f ��,�^�:t1�� —} s.�. This instrument w�s�cknawiedge�efore me on < �} , 1997, by Michael J.Nedelisky. �, � -.� . ,, . ,,, , -� \ �:� � OFFiC1AL5EA� Natary Public for Oregon a�o�r��.tocHEU My Ccmmission Expires � —` �1-,-�� NUTARV PUBLIC-0REGQN ��, COMMtSSIOIr NO 0�7166 �,1r I:OMM�5510N ExP1RE5 SEPT 27. 1999 RfCi�R�CAI L1CflSf 3 PAGE 3 ai 3 ' Apr-09-99 06: 34A P _05 �P-15-1y`Jr 1�� 1� ansnat tor� T ii le Ir�s. �:�i :�� b4 ��i'I�1 r.l�� "EICHl81T Il' to REI�PRpCAI UC �f f0�!PdRXIXG � I"Te�mple Propert�`1 A 7RACT C01NPR1SFD OF tANO DESCatgED AS PARCELS I, II AND Ilr IN QEfD RECORDEn J�uuA�Y 5, 1995, A5 FEE NO. 85001169, REGOR05 OF WASHlNGTON CUUNT'f, DRE60N. 51TUATED tN THE SDl1THEAST QUARTER OF SECTION 35, TOWNSNIP 1 SQUTN, RANGE 1 NIEST, WIUAMETTE MERlD1AN IN THE CiTI' OF TiGARO. WASNINGTQN COU�ETY, OREGON, T06ETHER WlTH THAT POATION DF THE LANO DfSCRiBED IN DEED RECORDED AUGUST 10, 1995, AS fEE N0.950b58Q8,AECQFiDS OF WASHINGTDN COUNIY,DAFGON,MORE PAR?ICUTARIY OFSCAlBEO AS FOLIQWS: COMMfNqNG A7 THE SOtlTHYYEST CDRNFR OF TNE TNQMAS A. S10TT OONATION LAMfl CUIIM N0. 53; THENCE NOATH 2°03�OQ'FAST,a DlST4NCF DF 780.38 FF£T TO THE SOlfTHEAST CORHER oF SArD Tw►CT�FSCRIBEO IN DFEO AfCORDED AS FEf HO_ 950558A8; TNENCE ALQN6 THE SOUTN LiNE OF SAID TRACT NORTH 81°57'01' WEST, A OISTANCE OF 50.00 FEET��THE'POlNT OF BfGINNi#6':THEHCE LEAVING SAIQ SOU7H LINE fYQRTH 2°Q3'00' EAST,Q AJSTANCF OF 37.39 FEF�;THEMCE NQRTH 49°06'23'WFST, A DISTANCE Of 91.68 FEE7 TO THE NORTH L1NE OF SAIO tRACT DESCRIBED IN DEED RECORBED AS FEE N0. 950S5808; THENCE ALONG SA1D NOR'(li LlP1E NORTH 87°58'19" WEST,A DfSTANCF OF 1U7.�7 FE�T TO h1E NOiiTHH[EST COR�iER Q�S�iD TAACI;THENC�ALONG THE WEST UME QF sA�O TRACT SDUTH 2°5r�3� WEST, A DISTANCE Of 94.85 FEET TO THE SaUtNWEST CORNFA OF SAID TiRACT; THEMCE ALONO TH�S`tiUTH L1NE OF SAID TRACT SOtITH 87°57'Oi'EAST,A DISTANCE OF 180.47 FEET TO THE'POINT - QF 8E6A1lNAVti`. � � 1Cartains 90,067 s+qt�sre feet,more ar!as) ; � � Apr-09-99 06z34A P_ 06 5tf'-1�-17��( 15� 1� ran5nd�lO� 11t iC ln�. LO �1�� Gtf� S3IIJ I�.YJ.� ' � • `^' � �� 'E7(HISIT 8' �o Rf�/PRaCAL UI.�A►Sf fUA�a�9XI1YG ('�ff'�n P^oPart� a TRAC7 CDMPRISED OF L�fO OfSC�18FD ur OFEDS AFCDADED AUGIIST 10,1995 Jl5 FEE N�'S 95�5587 0 AMa 4505581?AND PART OF THE UNB OESCRtBEQ Ik DEED RfCORDED 1S FI£ Nd 950558a8. RfCORDS OF WASii1NGT4N CODU(1Y, OAE60N, SITUATED IN THE SOIITHEAST aIJARTQt Of SEC1iGN 35,TOWNSH�P 1 SQU7}�,RAN6E 1 WEST,WttLAARETTE MERfDIAN,AY THE GITY OF TIG�►AD.WASMWGTOM COUHTY W TH£STA7E Of ORE60N BEU+IG YpRE PAR'T1CUlAf�IY OESCRtBED AS FOLLOWS: CDMMEHCW6 A7 THE SOUTHWEST CORNER �F THE TNOMAS Il STOTT OONATtQN IAM� CI1l1M MQ 53; T�tEN�f IVORTH Z'D3'OD'EAST,A DISTAMCE OF 7dQ.39 FfET TO Ti�tE SaUTHEAST CfltiNER OF SAlO TRACT OESCRIBEO IN OEfD AECOADED AS fff N0.8505�Q A1rID TtlE'P�MT Of BEGINNIIiC:THENCE ACON6 THE SOUTM UNE Of SAlO TAACT NORTN aT57'01'WEST. A 0lStANCE Of 50..D0 F�T;THEKCE[fAYIJW�SA10 SOUTH IJNE MOATH 2'0?'Oa'EAST,A DISTANCf OF 37.38 FEET:THENCE NORTH 49•06'23'WEST,A DISTANCE QF 91.68 fffT 10 TME NUASH L1NE Of SA10?AACT QESCR18fD IN DEED AECOROED A5 FEE N0. 95055848; THENCf A101�6 SAlO MORTH IINE HORTH 87°58'19' WEST, A OIS7ANCE OF 107_57 FEET TO TNE MORTFtWES?CORNEA OF SAID TRACT;TNENCF AION&THE WEST LWE OF SAPO TRAL'T'S RECOROED AS FEE N0.95055810 AMD 95055812 NORTH 02'S7'13'FaST,A DISTANCE Qf 263.41 FEET?0 T�IE Sal1THfRLY RiGHT-0FWAY UNE OF STATE HfGNWAY N0. 217; THENCE ALONa SA1D R(6HT-0E-WAY L1NE ON A 11,3t8_16 FOpT RADIUS NON-tAN8EAIT CURYE CONCAYE TO THE SOUT�lWEST (CHORO BFARS 5011TH 49'�4'4a' EAST, • 420.65 FEET1 A a157A1VCE OF 420.69 fEET TO A PO1NT OF JNTFRSFCTION WRH TNF SOl1TN UNF Of SJ�O TRAtT OESCRIBED IN DEED REtOAQFD AS f�N0.95055812 S�JO UNE A1S0 BQ�G THE SOUTFI UNE 4F LOT 19.BlAC1('0','METZ6fR ACAF TtiACl'S',THF]i10E AI�Na S�►1U SQUTH tINE 1�OR1�E9•03'05' -- 1NEST, A OISTANCE OF 105.32 f£fT TO THE EAST ll�IE OF SAIO TAI�CT�ESCRlBED tN DfED RECOqOED AS FFE K0.95a55810; THE�ICE ALON6 SA10 EAST 11NE�[IIa THE EAST UNE OF SAIfl TR�tT DESCii18ED IN OEED FifCOROED AS iEE N0.95055808 SOtJT1i 2'0700'1I�f5T.A DfSTMICE OF 115A7 iEET TD TNE'POIEIT Of BEQIWi1MG. [Centaies 66,t 33 aquin ie�t;mo�e sr kssl � � Turci P.03 Apr-09-99 06 : 35A P_07 -� .. � Sl..,c CF OfiEGON � SS , AFTEA RECdRDIAIG RETURN TQ: County ot Washf�gton •-„ 71bm.s�.slrr*q+�•Fs4 I, Jerr y (�. Hanson, Director o1 Agsess- C1S�l �8325 5.1IY.B�nesFrry RwO.Su+n 207 mcnt and .7"ax3tion and Ex-Otficio County J , lak,Osrp.,OR 97935 Clark for saiC county,do hereby certity tha: � the within inatrument o(wrl(Inq vSas rHCCivcd and rec�rded in booK ot'recorde. of said �O County. ' ., .- ^� � h�' .. �Jerry R;=Nsnson ,°Director of Asseeement'and'�1'axation. Fx- � O111cio,Counry�Cierk Doc : 97085692 Rect: 194148 78. UC 09/15/1997 03: 15: 51pm DECLARATION Of EASEMENT RECITALS WHEREAS, the undersigned Brahmapremananda Ashrama, which took titte as Brahma Premananda Qshram,an Oregon nnn•profit corporatian, herein caAsd"Grantor",is the owner in tee simple af a certain tract of land situated in Sectian 35. Township 1 S�uth, Range 1 West oi the Willamette Meridian, in the City of Tigard, County of Washington and State of Oregnn, more particularly described at E�rhibit Q annexed hereto and 6y this reference incorporated herein es it fully set forth, herein called "Servient Premises", and WHEREAS, the undersigned Michael J. Nedelisky, herein called "Grantee", is the ewner in fee simple of that certain tract of land situated in Section 35, Tawnship 1 South, Range 1 West of the Wiflamette Meridian, in the Ciry of Tigard, County of Washingtnn and Siate of Oregon, mere particularly described at Erhibit B annexed hereto �� and by this reference�incorporated herein as if fully set farth, herein called"Grantee's PremiSea", and WHEREAS, hy instrument recordad as Fee 1Vo. 88-9fi19, in the records of Washington County, Oregan, on March 9, 1988, Woadrow W. liughes, David W. Hughes and William B{ue, as the "Grantars' therein named, entered ietn a� Agreement for Shared Orive fasement And Maintenance, with Kinder-Care, Inc., a corpnration, therein named as `Grantee" therein called "Kinder-Care AQreement"1, affording to the said Kinder•Care, lnc., certain rights of access affecting a portion of the Servient Premises suhject tn certain affirmative undertalcings on the part of said Ki�der-Care, Ine;, to maintaio and repair, and bear the cort of maintenance and repair, of that p��tion of the Servie�t Premises affected by said agreement all as therein provided for, and � WHEREAS, hy instntment recorded as Fee No. 94033952, in the records af Washington County, Oregon, on Apr�7 8, 1994, the said Woodraw W. Hughes, David W. Nughes and William Blue, as the `Granturs" tl�erein named, entered intn an Ag�eement fo�Share�Orire Easement And Maintenance, with Carf Eshelman, the�ein named as "Grantee" (herein called 'Eshelman Agreertient"1, affording ta the said Carl Eshelman certain rights uf access affecting a portian of the Servient Premises subject to certain affirmative undeftakings on the part of said Carl Eshelman, to maintain and repair, and bear the cast of maintenance and fepai�, of that pa�tian of the Servient Premises affected by said agreement ap as therein p�ovided far, and WHEREAS, hy their terms, both the Kinder-Care Agreemeni and the Eshelman Agreement pro�ide: This Easement and Meintenance Agreemerrt sha!/be deemed to run with the lan�ana shall rnure ta !he " benelic vf aRd be Gind�ng upon Grantee, Grantors and therr�esQective her"rs, successars enJ essigns. DECtARAT10N Of EASEMENT / � ,� Page 1 of 8 Pages Apr-09-99 06 : 35A P _ 08 �. and WHEREAS, the Grantor and the Grantee named herein each desire and intend that they and each of them and their respe�tive successars in interest, transferees, assip�s, lessees, tenants and invitees shall now and fur all time hereafter have the unqualified riglit and ability to use, enjoy, occupy, improve, re-improve, construct improvements, reconstru�c improvements, deve[op and redevelop, sell, lease, rent and otherwise deal with all premises, parcels and tracts af land which the Grantor and the Grantee, ar either of their numbe�, or their respective successors in interest, transferees, a5signs, lessees, tenants and invitees, shall naw ar hereafter ov�n nr acquire the right to use or o��upy whieh may at anytime beaefit from the �ights of use and easemcnts created hereunder whet��er ar nat su�h premises, parcels and tracis of land are now owned, accupied or used hy Grantor or Grantee, alI to the highest and besi use which may be made of said premises, parcels or tracts of land, and WHERfAS, it is the purpose of this i�strume�t to estabfah and create in favor of the 6rantee, petpetual nen- ez�lusive rights and interests in the Servient Premises in every way sufficient to accompfish tfie desires and intent of the Grantu� an� Grantee above-stated and to hereby de�ne, fi�c and estabtish it perpetuity, for the benefit af each ef their number, their said su��essors in interest, traasferees, assigns, lessee5, tenants and invitees respectively, the uses and purposes for which the Servient Premises shall be committed, employed, imQraved and maintained withont in any manee� efEecting car.ve}�ance of the fee title to the Serv9ant Premises or any portion thereoF, AGREEMENT � � � In ccnsideratioa of the faregoing recitals and the mutua{ declaratiens and agreements herein contained and set forth, it is hereby COYENQNTED AND AGREED by and between the Grantor and the Grantee, each with the other, as foflows: 1. Easement for Surface Access and EQress. The Servient Premises shall be, and are here6y, declared and suh{ected ta a commort, nan-exclusive easement and right ef way ior surface vehicutar and pedestrian access to and egress from the whole of all adjoining tracts of land now owned, ar which are hereafter acquired, by the Grantar or by the Grantes, inc(uding, but nat limited to, the Grantee's Premiaes abave described, arid which 6e within, or, as the case may 6e, which lie cantiguous with,�any portion af tfie Servient Premises, the Grantee`s Premises or both of said Q�emises, whether o� oot any such adjoininp tracts of land so owned shall, now ar hereafter, be described in gross or as sepa�ate parcels ar tracts; whether ar not any or all of said adjoining tra�ts of land shall be imp�oved or developed to any extent whatsaever, and at such time ur time5 as the same shall he :�:p!Qysd, �+eYSlaped and used, tn whatever extent any or ali of said adjoining tracts shall be lawfully improved, developed and used at any time in the future. The easements and rights of way established and �reated hereby shall�un with tltie laads se:�jected thereta, and the !anda tienefited thefeb�, and sAall biad and inure to the benefit of the Grantor and the Grantee and iherc respective heirs, successors in interest and assigns. 2. Easement far Utilities aed Servicas. 5ubject to requirements, regulatians, restrictions naw, or at any time hereafter, lawfulty imposed by duly cunstituted govecnmental autharities, the Servient Premises shall be, and are here6y, declared and subjected to a cammon, non-exciusive eaaement and right af way tor the undergrnund, su�face and abave-ground installation, construction, reconstruction, platement, use and maintenance of utilities � services and their essociated conduits, equipment, cnmpanents, pipes, conductars, controls, metering and DECLARATION OF EASEMENT � Page 2 of 8 Pages Apr-09-99 06: 35A p _ pg monitoring devir.es, connections,inlets,outlets, vaults, means of access and means of suppart wh¢ther below, on, or above the wrface of the land, incl�ding, but not limited to, water servicx af any description; sanitary sewer coltection, starage, processing, pumping an�lor dsposal; storm sewers, rain drains, catchment, control andlar drainage of sarfa�� and �bove grnund runoff from lands and impravements; electric services and etectricity; telecommunicatians of every description, fire mains and hydrants,natural gas transmission, and generaAy �II other additional o� oiher equipment nr installations which may, from time to time, become necessary or convenient for purposes of rendering necessary utifities and services available to, and adequate for development and use of, the whole of al! adoining tracts of laod now nwned, or which are he�eafter acquired, by the Grantor or hy the Grantee, incfuding but not Gmiied to the Grantee's Premises a�ove destri6ed, which lie within, or, as the case may be, wluch 1ie contiguous with any pa�tion of the Servient Premises, the Grantee's Premises or �oth cf sai�! premises, whethar or nat anY su�h adjoining tracts of land so owned shall be,now o�hereafter, descri6ed in gross or as separate parceis or tracts; wheiber ar not any or aii of said �ujaining trrtts of land shall be impraved or developed to anY extent whatsoever, and, at such t�nne or iimes as the same s!►all be improved, developed and used, to whatever eYtent any or all of said adjoining tracts sna"u oe iawiuiiY impraved, deveioped and used at any time in the future. 3. Easernent fvr Monurnents. Signs and Billboard5. Subject to requirements, reguiations, restrictions naw, or at any time hereafter, imposed by duly co�stituted govemmental authorities, the Servient Premises described shall be, and are here6y, declared and subjected to a comman, non•exclusive eas¢ment for construction, reconstruetion, installation, use and maintena�ce of permanent monuments, signs er 6illhoards placed solel}r fa� the purpose of identifying by nametsi, addressiesl, activity(iesl, 6usiness(es�, commereial or other uses, any party or parties who may octupy any partian of any improvemetits placed on�any land benefited by the easesrrents estahGshed at garagraphs 1 w 2 a6ove. PROVIDED, HOWEVER, no such marwment, sign or billboa�d shail he _ ptaced or erected upun,or extend over or above, any improved rasdway, driveways or pedestrian wafkways new, ar at any time he�eafter, pfaced anywhere within, or whicb intersects or abuts, the buunda:ies of the Servient Premises; no�sha8 eny tuch monument,sign ar billboard he configu�ed iri such a way, or arected or p(aced in such lotation o�menner, as may in any way materially interfere with, or o6str�ct, either: {a)free and caavenient access to any imo�nvemenis located upon any tract or tracts of land benefited by the; easements established by paragraphs 1 or 2 ahove by means of any improvements made upon ar to the Servient Premises or by any ather means; or i6} censtruction, retonstra�tion, installation, ase or maintenance of any improved roadwa�t, driveways, pedestrian watfcways, landscaping or other improvements o� instaRatians located upan, abo�e or beneath the surface of laed lying within the bovndaries of the Servient Premaes othe� than ma�uments, signs or bdtboards p[aced tt�eoa: or (c1 the a6iGty af peraons intending to enter onto ar to depart from the Servient Premises fram the pu6Gc roadway which lies contiguous with the easternmost bou�dary thereof, to �eadiy perceive and identify the entrance tn the Servient Premises from said roadway and safety enter into, ar depart from, said entrance on or by means of said public roadway. 4. Easements Apaurtenant. The rights and easements described and created hereunder shafl endure in perpetuity and shall be and remain appurtenant to the Grantee's Premises above•descrihed and to any additianal or other p�emises, parcels or tracts of land hereaker acquired by the Grantnr ar the Grantes as aforesaid. 5. Grants to Third Parties. Grantor ezpressly ag�ecs that it will not, without the cunsent, joinder and agresment i� writing af Grantee, voluatarily affo�d �o any thi�d psrty or pacties, inctudinq, without fimitation, the grantee name� in the l(inder•Care Agreement its successort in inierest, transferees o� assigns, and the grantee named in the Eshelman Apreement, his successo�s in interest, transferees and assigns, any rights ar interests in or affecting the Servient Premises ar the easements and intetests afforded the Grantee hereunder, it being � DECLARATION OF EASEMENT � Page 3 of B Pages Apr-09-99 06: 36A P _ 10 specifically acknowledged on the part of the Grantor that any such rights or interests afforded any such third ` party or parties will result in ir�eparable harm to Grantee and Grantee's Premises herein descrided. 6. Im rnvement Mainten nce and Ra air of Servient Premises The Grantcr and Grantee a�knowiedge that by means of the Kinder-Care Agreement and the Esheu�an AgraE�ent above-�neniioned, each of the grantees thereunder and their respecdve succe5sors in interest and assigns, became ohligated for maintenance and repair of "...the shared drive..." su6ject of a�� described in each of said agreements '_..su lang as the lands to the west which are henefited by the shared drive contain na more than two single family residence5." The Grantor and Grantee further acknowledge that said agreements and each nf them further provide as folEows: In the event the lartds to the west ar� deve/oped�a inc�ease the vehrrular trurden an the sh�red drive, the�lrom such time fonvaid the cost of maintaining fhat porrion of the shared drrve constructed ta t/le west af[h8t point 120 feet ta[he west of S W.HaU 8oaleva�d sha/1 be shaied pro�ale�sic)tv th�amount al square footege of each parcel ryhrch has access ta S.W.HallBauleraid through said shaied drive,. _ . Actnrdingty, the 6rantor and Grantee hereby undertake and agree thaL as respects that partinn of any shared driveway now exisiing upon the Servient Premises lying within 120 feet af the easterly baundary aF S.W. Hall Boulevard and with respect to that po�tion af any surface impravemenis heteafter constructed or recnnstro�ted upon the easte�ly 12D feet ofi the Servient Premises for tne purpnse of vehicula�acce5s and egress only which arE c�sed by or tor the benefit of the grantees named in said agreements, theu successars in interest or assigns, ar any uf said parties, the Grantor and the Grantee shafl 6ear the cust ta maintain and repair such shared driveway and surface improvemenis which it is nnt the obligatiun af the grantees under said agreements to bear as aforesaid, in ac�ordance with the fo�nula implicit in the terms of said agreements set forth above. As res�ects that portion af all and any other improvements, of whatever kind or nature which are now existing or — - 6ereafter construtted or recanstructed, placed c� i�s:a!�pd on, 6enea:h or a5uve the surface of the Servie�t Premises, including, but not limited to, surface improvements provided for the purpases of vehicular access and egress onty, which do not benefit, and are not used in cannection with, any use ar improvements occurring an premises not owned by the Grantor or the Graniee, the Grantor and the Graatee, shall share in the cnsts to install aad cunstruct, and t� repair and nnaintain, any and all such other improvements in sfiares reasona6ly and fairly proportionate tn the benefit �onferred by such impruvements on their respective lands and the irnprovements oow, and at anytime hereafter,constructed thereon_ In establishiag the reasonably and fairty propartionate shares of costs to be h�rne hy the Grantor aad the Grantee as stated a6ove, the following factors sha0 be applied: : a, Whether the subject improvement in fact benefits the lands and improvements of tlie Grantor and the Gra�tee in the sense that such im�ruva�r��t is necessarv in order for such lands and im�rovaments to ae usxd and oc�u�igd. if na such henefit is provided, no share of the coats entailed in instalGng and canstructing and repairirg and maintaining shall be horne hy the owner of the lands and impravements not benefited_ b. Whether the s�h;��+imarovement casts mare ta install or construct within ar uoan the Servient Premises because it 6enefits the lands and improvements of both parties rather than the lands and improvernents vf one Qartv exclusivelv_ If the subject improvement benefits the land and improvements of both the parties and if the casts to instell or canstru�t such improvert�nt are not at least five percent 15°!�I greater than they would 6e if theY henefited the lands and impravements of one party e:�lusively, then the costs to install or construct,and the costs to maintain and �epair, such improvement shall be sha�ed equally by the Granto�an� Grantee. 8ut ii such costs a�e at least five pereent (5%) greater 6acause such improvements henefit the -- lands and it�prove�nents of beth parties, then the cost to install o�constntct such improvement within or upon DECLARATfOw OF EASEMENT � Page 4 of e Pages Apr-09-99 06: 36A P _ 11 � the Servient Premises for the exclusive use an� benefit of the Grantor's lands and the cost ta install or construct such improvements within or upon the Servient Premises far the exclusive benefit of the lands and v improvements of the Grantee shal[ be determined and combined (addedl to form the denominator of a fractional share, the numerator of which, as respects each party,shall be the cast ta install a�construct such improvement within or upan the Servient Premises far tfte excfusive benefit of such party_ Such fraction shall then be used to detennine each party's share of the cest ta install or canstruct such improvement witliin or upon the Servient Premises as well as each party's share at the future cost to maintain or repair such improvement. c. Whether ar nat the necessity to maintain ar repair an imorovement within or uoon the Servient Premises is caused or �antri6uted to bv wronqful nr nealinent act or omission of the Grantor or the Grantee or af anY Qerson or persons regardless of their 5tatus as aa awner, lessee, tenant, licensee. invitee or tresvassei. entering IeavinQ comingon ta usina or occupvina the I nds or imntovements of the Grantor or the G�antee other than the Servient Premises or some partion thereof. If maintenance or repair of an improvement withio or upon the Servient P�emises, or the Servient Premisas themselves, is not caused by tl�e wrongful or negiigent act or omission of Grantor o� Grantee or any person or persons entering,leaving, coming on to, using or occupying the tands or improvements af either the Grxotur ar Grantee as aforesaid, the costs of any such maintenance or repair shall be shared hy the Grantor aod the Grantee as descri6ed in the next preceding par�graph. Othe�wise, such costs shall be borne in their eatirety 6y the party whose wronqful or negC�gent aets or omissions caus¢d or contributed to the need tha[ such casts be incurted or 6y the party owning the Iands or inprovements subject of enterinq, [eaving, coming on ta, use or ac�upancy hy such person or persons. d. Whether ar not an imorovement installed or constructed within or upon the Servient Premises requires -- maintenance or reaair rev�acement recanstructar or uaaradina due to chan�es in. or intensification of, uses e� a^tiv':res ec��.�R�ne �►oon or�evelapment nr 9m��avements uf the !3nda af the Granto�o�the Grantee. If, salely by reason of such changes or intensifitatio�, an improvement previous{y instal(ed or conswcted within or upon the Servient Premises must 6e maintau�ed, repaired, replac¢d, retanstructed, upgraded, relocated ar otherwise modified, as costs assaciated with maintenance, repair, replacement, reconstruction, upgrading, relocation or other mod'rfi�atian, including any and aII res�itinq costs and expenses incur�ed with respect to nther�nprovements affected by such actions, are tu be borne by the owner of landt upon which such changes ot intensified uses ar activities have accurred or will accur regardless of any incidental benefits which might in the future be conferred on other lands havi�g potential access to such improvement. However, if eny such � maintenance, repair, re�facement, reconstruction, upgradng, relocatian or other modificati�n results in eny immediate a�d direct enha�cement of services or in ihe kind, quaGty or quantiry of services or utiGties, actvally eraitable to, and used or consumed an, the lands of the other party, then the casts of future maintenancE nr repair of such improvement zhaA he burne equally between the Grantar and the Grantee. 7. Taxes on Servient Premises. If the 6rantor, the Grantee, or both the Grantor and Grantee, shall become obGgsted as the uwners of lands benefited ay imp�ovements installed, constructed er used withi� or upan the Servient Premises, for the payment of any ta:es, e:cises or assessments levied based on the value of such improvements a upan the rights and interests affarded under this inatrament, as distinguished from the unimproved value of the real property comprising the Servient Premises, then the Grantar and the Graatee shall egch �espectively assume, pay and satisfy such tazes, azcises or assessmentt p�omptly and 6efore arry partion thereof shall become in arrears or past due. G�antor shal! fuNy pay and satisfy aay such ta�es, e:cises or assessments levied based un the unimproved value of the real p�operry comprising the Servient P�emises all as �� herainefter p�escribed: DECLARATION OF EASEMENT S Pags 5 of B Pages Apr-09-99 06 : 37A P_ 12 a. �n or before the 31st day of December each year commencing with the year 1997, Grantnr shall deliver � to Grantee, and Grantee sha11 deliver to 6rantor, at their respective addresses appearing on ttie reat property tax ralls of Washington County, Oregon, a statement in writing setting forth the amount which the party delivering said statement cantends such party has mcurred in the way of liability for the payment of taxes, ex�ises andlor assessments levied on ar with re5pect to said improvements, rights and interests as aforesaid daring the fistal taz year beginning on the fi�st day of July nf suth year. b. IVot later than the 15th day oE February af the year following tl�e date upQn which statements are to be delivered as aforesaid, each pa�ty shall deliver ta the ather party at the address of the other party mentioned above, a seco�id statement setting tarth the amount, if any, which the party delivering such statement claims the party ta whom such statement is delivered is obligated to pay to, o� reimburse, the party delivering such statement, on acceunt of the tatal amuunt of taxes, exci5es andlor assessments levied on, or with respect to, said improvements, rights and interest5 previo�asly paid ar thereafter payable, Dy the party delivering such statement and cfaun. c. Said obligations shaA be determined each year in a�cordance with the same factors ba5ed upan which bnth partiei re5pective shares of the costs of maintenance ana repair af all imp�overnents installed within or upen the Servient Premises would otherwise be determined on the fir=t day ef the fiscal tax year subject of � sach statements in accordance with the fnreg:�ng provisions of thi�insVument. d. If, according t� the second statements exchanged by the Grantar and the Grentee as aforesaid, the net difference between the amauots, if any, each party cfaims the other is obligated to pay ar reimburse it oa accnunt of all taxe5, eYCises and assessments wbject of such party's se�ond statement, does not exceed tf�e sum af ane thousand dollars (51,000.00) neither party ahall be obligad tc pay or reim6urse the other any � emount whatsoever on a�count of such tazes, eicises and(ar assessments. Otherwise, the net difference betwee� the two amounts claSmed, to the exte�t the same exceeds the sum of one thousand dollars, shail be paid by the party which edvan�ed the lesser claim to the party which advanced the gceater cfaim, o� the parties shaA u�dertake to compromire thei�differences,within thirty (301 days following the date both secund statements shalt have been deGvered as eforesaid and, tailing such compromise, the matter shall be submitted to binding arbitration as hereinafter deuribed. e_ In the event either the Grontor or the Grantes shaQ fail, neg(ett or refuse, for any reason whatsaever, to deliver to the other either the (irst or second statement at the time and in the manner above stated, then the party who delivered such statements and each of them as afnresaid shall be entitled ta recover f�om the other party whatever artwunt the party delivering wch statements contends, in such party's second statement,tfie other part�r is o6liged to pay or reim6urse the party wha delivered such statements and such conte�tian shal! be deemed final,canclusive and hind�ng oa hath parties far all�urposes whatsoever. 8. DutY to Insure: Indemn'rficatian. At sll tenes, the Grantor and the Gra�tee ahall each and severally pracure and maintain at their sole cost and expense,one or more policies ar contracts of insurance providing coveraqe and indemnity, in an insu�ed amaunt of not less that S 1,000,�00.00, for and against losses and damages clairned by o� on behalf af the other party, and 6y third parties, includinfl, withaut limitation, damage5 far loss, damage and depreciation of persunal property, badily injury and lass of life, arising out of the use o� condition of ihe Se�vient P�emises and all improvements now, or at anytime hereafter, placed, focated, instafled, constructed or used thereon and fo�any such �laims arising out of the any insura6le activities conducted thefean 6y any third party o� parties emplored by o� on behalf of the Granto� a� the Grantee for the purposes of installing, constructing, maintainir�g o�repairing any and sll such improvements_ At atl times, the 6�antar and the Grantee shall each and �- sevareNy keep and maintain ac their own expense their respective interests in the Servient Premises insured DECLARATt0�10� EASEMENT � Pags 6 af 8 Pagas Apr-09-99 06= 38A P_ 13 against fire and such other risks and casualties as they may resQectiveiy, and from time•to-time, each and �`. independently dete�mine to insure. Pravided, however, that the Grantar and the Grantee do hereby expressiy agree one with the other, that they will fully indenv�ify and save haRnless the other from, for and against all and any 4osses, liabilities, claims, damages and expenses, includi�g without limitation costs af defense and attorneys' fees, which the other may at anytime suffer or incur which are taused, to the extent the same are contributed to, by tkie wrongful ar nepligent acts or nmissions of their respective employees, agents, representatives, tenants, invitees, licensees, perrnittees, contractors, and subcanVactors and(or by any casualty or occurrence Enr which su�h party might have abtained insurante cammonl! availahle at reatonahle cost in �elatian to the magnitude of the risks insured, by reaaon of their respective interests in, and �antractual undertakings with respect to, the Servient Premisss herein descri6ed or established. 9. Ar6itration, if any dispute erises hetween the Grantor and the Grantee hereunder, the same shall be submitted to ar6itration fur final and binding determination. Either the Grantor or the 6rantee may request arhitratian of any such dispute and appoint one individual to act in the capacity of an arbitrator. Upon receipt of any such request for arbitration, t6e othe� party may appoint one individual to act in the capacity ef an arbitratar and the twa arbitrafars so appointed shatl appoint a third arbitrater. If the appomtrnent of either the second or third arbitrator is not made within ten f10) dayt of appoi�tment of thc arbitrator previousty appointed,thea either the Grantar or the Grantee may apply to the p�esiding judge of Washington Caunty, Oregon, to appoint the required arbitrator. The arbitratars so appainted shall proceed according to the Oregon statutes governing arbitration (cu�rently cantained in Chapter 36, ��egon ReYised Staturesl, and the awa�d of the.arbitrators shall have the effect thetein provided. Said arhitration shall take place in Waahington Caunty, Oregon. The casts of the ar6itration shall 6e shared equally by the parties, hut ea�.h part}r shal! Pay its nwn attotney fees incurred in connection therewitli unless otherwise determined hy the awa�d on ar6itration. In the conduct of any such `. arhitration, eacfi party shall have the right ta conduct discovery by all and any means ava�able to partie5 engaged in civil itigatian then pending in the U.S. OisVict Court fo�Oregon,sitting at Portland. 10. Partles Bound. Tttiis inswment and the terms and provisions herein centained shall 6ind, and irn�re to the benefit of the Grantar,the G�antee and the successors in inte�est,heirs, personal representatives,.transferEes and assigns of the G�antor at+d the Grantee. ' 11. Effects of Conflicts With Other Aareements. lnsofar as the terms of this instrtunent rnay now, or at any time hereafter, be deemed or construed to conflict witli tha terms or provisinns uf any other and,priar aqreemeni ar instrument purpart�ng to fix, descnbe, create or establish right� an� interests in the Senrient Premisas ar any Po�tion thereof tn which the Grantos or the Grantee, or their predecessors in irtterest, may he parties, then to the exient pos5ibk e� conformity with applicable lega! a�d equitable princi�les a�d preceden� this insWment and the terms and provisio�s herein cantained shal) be afForded precedence, replace and wper�e�e such confliciing terms and provisions af said pnor agreement or instcument and the same shaU be null, void and of no further effect whatsaever. 12. Remoteness of Vesting:Severabilitv. If, and in the event, anY rights, interests or claims arising, or whi�h might arise, under or which are descri5ed in, or created by, this instnunent shall be deemed or coestrued by any caun or tribunal havinq lawful jurisdction to do so, ta cnnffict with,ar re�dered unenforceable, unrecognizabie er void by �easan of, any rale af law or equitq pertaininq to remoteness of vesting, then such tetms or provisions shaY be deamed and conshued enforcea6le and valid fer so loog, and to such extent, as such rule of law shall pem►it, end nn longer or further. tf any terms or pravisions of thi� instrument shall be found invalid or unenfv�cea6le to any eYtent hy judgment or dec�ee o# any court or trihunal having lawful jurisdiction to do su, the � DECLAAATIDM OF EASEMENT � Page 7 of 8 Pagca Apr-�9-99 06: 38A P_ 14 validity and enforceability of tfie remaining tetms and provisions shaA t he affected and the same shall be � canstrued tc effect the evident intent of the parties insofar as reasa h p 5sible. lN WITAIESS WHEREOF, the Grantar and the Grantee have her un o n s e ective as af the latest date set farth below. BRAHMAPREMANAN�A ASHRAMA, an Oregan non-profi� torporation, G ntn� M AEL J. EEIS Grantee BY — Swami Viswa Premananda, Qresideat 8Y,.— � Bha�at Naik, Sectetary State of Oregort,County of�,la ' } s-s. This instrument was acknowledged befo�e me o _ 2 1997, by SWAMI VISWA PREMANANDA as President of Brahmaproman�nda Ash�ama, an Ore n non-profit wrparation. U Ih� � � oFFic�wi.�s�� Notary PubGc for Oregon s�ooK�uu�u►N (� NOtARY PU6LtC-qREGON My Cammtssion EYpirBS lY_ � _ CAMM19SION N0.06+d35 MY COMM�SSiON�fPIRES JUNE O;i.2000 State of Oregon, Cuunty of } s.s. - This instrument was acknawledged before me on . �O, 1997,�y Sharat�laik as Secrp+.ary Qf��!±�*��re�a�anda Ash►�r�,an�go!! on•profit carpo�at±on. � p�i�gE,� Notary Pubfic for Oreqon �T�� My Comrnission Exp'ues c,o�a�oN�+o.�+ass � � MY COMMN83101J EXPItiE3 JUNE 0�,2000 State of Orepon. Coanty of (>>�A�} s.s. ��.L 1 .1 .t 1. !.. Q N`I TiiiS iil$iili�ii�i�i 3� a iwwi�8uycy�rc��ic �T�c �+i� _s�� 1997, hy Michael J. Nedelisky. \ �.�ti�� oFFia�s�►� Natary Pubiic for Oregon � avsm�coc�eu p �-c��-qq NOTARII PU9lIC-0REGON My Cammission Ex ires jCOMMI$SION HO.Oa7�66 `; MY CUI�MISSION E7CP1RE5 StVT_ 27,iyy3 ; �� DECIARATION OF EASEMENT � Page 8 of e PaQes Apr-09-99 06= 39A P_ 15 "EX HIBIT A" TO v OECLARA TION Oi fASfi!/fNT B�ahmapremananda Ashrama, Grantor; Michael J_ Nedelisky, Grantee; [Description of Servient Premisss) BEING A PORTION OF THAT TRACT OF LAND DECRIBED AS PARCELS I, II AND III IN DEEO RECORDED JANUARY 5, 1995, AS FEE NO_ 95�01164, flEC�RDS OF WASHINGTQN COUNTY, OREGON, SITUATED IN THE SauTtiEAST QUaRTER OF sECTION 35, TOWNSHIP 1 SoUTH, Ran1GE y wEST, WILLAMETTE MERIDIAN, iN THE CITY OF TIGARD, WASFiINGTON COUNTY ANO STATE OF ORfGON, BEING MORE PARTICULARLY OESCRIBED AS fOLLOWS: COMMEIUCING AT THE SOUTHWEST CORNER OF THE THOMAS A. STOTT DONATIQN LAND CIAIM N0. 53; THENCE NQRTN 2°03'00' EAST, A DISTANCE OF 780.39 FEET TO THE SOUTHEAS?CURNER OF THAT TRACT OF LANQ DESCRIBED IN OEED RECOROED AUGUST 10, 1995, FEE N0. 95055808, DEED RECORDS OF WASHINGT�N COl7NTY, OREGON. AND THE °POINT OF BEGINNING';THENCE ALON6 THE EAST L1NE OF THE TRACT DESCRlBED AS PARCELS 1I AND Ill IN SQID DEEO RECORDED AS FEE N0. 95001169 SOUTH 2°03'00" WEST, A DISTANCE OF 110.23 FEET TO TFfE NORTH LINE OF THE TRACT DESCRIBED AS PARCEL I IN SaID DEED: THENCE ALONG SA1D N�RTH LINE SOUTH 89°03'OS" EQST, A DISTANCE OF 287.47 FEET TO THE WEST IINE OF SOUTIiWEST HALC BOLIIEVARQ(CQUNTY RQAD N0.947):THE�ICE ACONG SA1D RIGH7•OF-WAY LINE SOIITH 0°56'55` WEST, A DISTANCE OF 3207 FEET TD THE SOUTH LINE OF SA1D PARCEL (; THENCE Y AtONG SA[D SOUTH LIiVE N�RTN 89°51'S4" WEST, A DISTANCE OF 338_23 FEET;THENCE�N A LINE THAT IS PARALtEI WITH AND 5U.OU FEET DISTANT TO THE EAST LINE OF SA10 PARCELS II ANO Ill NORTH Z°03'00" EASi', A DISTANCE �F 148.01 FEET TO 7HE SOUTH LINE OF SAIO TRACT DESCR18E0 IN DEEQ RECORDED AS FEE M0. 95055808; THENCE ALOiVG SAID SOUTFI UNE SOUTH 89°57'�1" EAST, A DISTANCE OF 50.00 FEET TO THE 'POINT OF BEGINNlNG". CONTAlNING 17,180 FEET MORE OR LESS. � EXH1BlT A DECLARATIaN OF EASEME�IT � Page 1 of 1 Psges Apr-09-99 06z39A P _ 16 "EXHIBlT 6" TO DECtARAT/4N OF EASFMENT Bcahmapremananda Ashtama, Grantor; Michael J. NedeliskY, Grantee; (Oescription nf Grantee's Premises] A TRACT COMPRtSED OF LAND DESCRIBED IN DEEDS AECORDED AUGUST 10,1995 AS FEE NO'S 95055910 AWD 95055812 AhtO PART OF THE lANO DESCRIBED IN DEED RECORDED AS FEE N0.95055608,RECOROS OF WASHINGTON COUNTY, OREGON, SITUATED IN THE SOUTHEAST QllARTER OF SECTIaN 35, T�WNSHIP 1 SOUTH, RANGE 1 WEST, WILLAMETTE MfRI01AN, IN THE CI7Y �F TIGARD, WASHINGTON COUNTY 1N THE S7ATE OF OREGON BEING MORE PARTICULARLY DESCRiBED AS fOLLOWS: COMMENCING AT THE SOUTHWEST CORNER QF THE THOMAS A. STOTT DONATION LAND CLAIM N0. 53; THENCE NORTH 2°D3'00' EAST, A DISTANCE OF 78�.39 FEET TO THE SOUTNEAST CORNER OF SAID TRACT QESCRIBED IN DEED RECORDED AS FEE N0, 95055808 ANO THE `POIM1IT OF BEGfNNING'; TIiENCE ALONG THE SaUTH LINE OF SAID TRACT NORTH B7°57'01" WEST, A DISTANCE OF 50,00 FEET; THENCE LEAYING SAID SOUTH UNE NORTH 2°03'00` EAST, A DISTANtE OF 37.38 FEET:THENCE NORTH 49"O6'23"WEST, A DISTANCE aF 91.68 FEET TO THE NORTH LINE OF SAIO TRACT DESCRIBED IN DEED REC�RDED AS FEE N0. 95055808; THENCE ALONG SAfD NORTH LIiVE NOATH B7°58'19" WEST, A DISTANCE OF 107.57 FEET TO THE NORTHWFST CORNER OF SAID TRAGT; THENCE ALONG THE WEST IINE Df SAIO TRACTS RECORDED AS FEE N0. 95055810 AND 95055812 NaRTH�2°57'13' EAST, A OISTANCE OF 283.41 FEET t0 THE SOUTHFRtY RIGHT-OF•WAY LINE OF STATf NIGHWAY N0.217;THEMCE ALONG SAID RIGHT-OF• WAY UNE ON A 11,319.16 FOOT RA01llS NON-TANGENT CURVE CONCAVE TO THE SOUTHWEST (CNORO BEARS SOUTN 49°34'48'EAST,-420.68 FEET!A DISTANCE OF 420.69 FfET TO Q POINT Of 1NTEASEC710N W(TH THE SaUTH � LINE OF SA1D TRACT DESCRIBEa IN DEEO RECOROEO AS FEE N0.9505581Z SAID lWE ALSO BEING THE 50UtH UNE OF LDT 19, BLOCK "0'. "METZGEA ACRE TRACTS", THENCE ALONG SAID SOUTH CINE N�RTH 89°03'05' WEST, A OISTANCE OF 105.32 FEET TO THE EAST LINE OF SAIO TRACT DESCRIBED IN DEEO REC�RDED A5 FEE NQ. 95�55810; THEIVCE ALONG SAID EAST UNE AND THE EA57 UNE Of SA[� 7RACT DESCRIBED IN DEEO RECOROED AS FEE N0. 95055808 SOUTH 2°a3'00"WEST.A DISTANCE OF 115.07 FEET TO THE'POINT OF BE61NNlNG". CONTAININ6 58.133 S�UARE FEET, MORE OR LE55. �.. EXHiB{T B DECLARATION Of EASEMENT �O Pege 1 nf t Pages Jur�-13-1��+�?� 11�b0 F.�1 FAX TRANSMI��AL To: S � pK ( COMPANY: FAX NO : � �" � "' � � 7 � DATE: '�} f � Z ' � 9 S FROM: � �-(��Z RT PHONE NO: FAX NO_ (5n3L_454-2233 TOTAL NUMBER OF PAGES (INCLUDING CO�IER SHEET) �_ ' CONIIrIENTS : �cL✓�C'► � . � _` - __ � Por[land Generai Elec;r�c � �'r' � � J�Ji V..1� 1=� L: !U � • -- �Y 74Q it6d2� This ]1gre�nt im m�de :his � day af Novenbe.r, I997 bat�r�en K3chael J. Ned�li�ky (^Ned�lisky") and Brahma Premananda Ashzalaa, an Orsqvn non-pzo�it corporation ("Ashrama") . a�Y��► _a �. Wadalisky o�ans th� r�al, grapgrty deacribad on the attacbed Yxhibit A_ g, As2vcama ovn� the real praperty descrzbed on th@ attached Exhibit B. ashrama's proparty is adjacont tv and south of N�dalisky'6 prvga.rty. C. Hedelisk� as�d Ashrama have made prior aqzeements alloiring shared parking betv;�n Idedal is]cy�s propezty arid ]1sh.zaaa'a property, unda�.= certai2i conditicns. 2tedelisky and ]�shraaa have also mada eQrtain agt�eme.tztz ralatinq ta utilities, a�c�se, and maintenanee of the acesss to their properties. D. Ned�lisky �iahtc to davalap Ne.dali6ky'� prope7rty nvLr. l�iihraaa doee not inttnd to dev�Iop Ashrema's prop�rty until atter Hedelis]cy�s y=ep�rty is a�veloDed. E_ DTsdelisky visheks to construct aome par]c.inq spaces partly on F►shrama•s property. Thi¢ �rould incr�msa thn amaunt o! parkirtg immediataly availabla to NedQlizky's praperty. Aahr�m,a is villing to grant penaisaivn ta Nede2lsky to build thase parking spacea on ashraaa•a property, on the terms and conditior� or this Aqresment. Noi�l. T�REFORE, Nedal.isky and AsRra.ma agzee a: fdllo�s: 1_ The recital9 above are true and correct and are a part vf thf.� A.qra�mer�t- � . Ashrama grants to l�ads2isky the�Rt tfl censtruct pavad parkinq spaaas in th� pertion ot Ashrama's praperty cross-hatohr_d on th� attach�d Exhibit c. Thig portion ineludee an arta nlraady aubj4ct to an acc�ss Qasamsnt in favor ot Nedelisky and another aroa not sa aub�ect. � 3 . N�delisky �ill construct thz parkinq spacss sntirely at Hedelisky•s expente and withvut a .right to contribution rrom 1�►shtama, notvithetanding any oth�2' aqreemin�betwean Nedelisky and Ashrama• Th+e pertiea vill, hoorever, hara the mnintenanca coat o� the3a garking spacat in accordanc� �rith Qix prior agresm,�nt�_ 4. 2ledelisky uill also congtruct. entirely at tiedelisky's expense, th� acces� drivQuay rrom S.W. Hall BQUl�vard to Nadelisky'6 proparty, aCro�s a�d through tho eaa�ment zroa on A�hrama's propsrty 1 - 71,G�F�'�I�'I' wa�oe�s w.i►...Qr 3ur•�-1�-i�; � , ��,. °.�]�, th�t be�its K�dQliS�T.__s__ proppr�y and a pave3 parXinq area sufPieient tor parking o no es 12 autamobilQS north and aa�t �f ths �Sxistinq House^ 6hovn on Exhibit C. , imaediately south o� tAe eas�merit area. Fedslisky and Ashrama rri11 ahar� aaintena�nce ot thm sccass aas�ent in acccrdanca �rith their pr�or eqrasment�. 5_ T�Ph�n lQedalisky improvas tha accaar oasem�nt, Nedelieky vill also car►struct �e+,►er, vatcz and natural qas aervic� lin�s to serv� Nedeliaky'a propsrty. For thoee uti�itiet that arn underneath the acc��s �aa�nt and ioz yhich ?�brama notitiac ?=odelisky of I,shra�w's rsquizas�nt: ror ssrvicn capacity uithin (op da�►s a�`ter t.he date of t2iis A�qra�aent, Kadelisky xill bu�d urieQrground servicn lines vith a capaeity autlici�nt to s�rve botti Nedelicky's propsrty vhsn dev�laped and l►.chrama'� property uhen develcped. Hedelisky �,►ill i.r►stall tap� for plugs Zor the undezgro�snd utilities uhar� th� access eaaa�asnt turns fz'os an East Waat direction to a North Scuth dir�ction sa that ]�►ahzama'n property can connect to those plwqs when �shzama's property is davQloped. Nedelisky vill pay ror the laboz and aatsrials to dv this. li�dslisky vill pay the charqes tor p4rmits re�irsd to eons�ct_t�tte sgrvic� 23nea mentidned aDove_not includinq a�n co� a�sx ate�i'� 'p� -�m-'its, cannection, meter reas or�Fo I�e �currad or chargsd oa accoun ot inatallation ar connecticn or any s�rvice linss vhich may rtcnr or h�reattar ba connectad to such service linas to serve t2� ashrama'� proQvrty. A3hramn vi.�l�,�,v, as and Wh4n du��ail snd any tep-in, p@rm1t, corutsction, er meter fees and o er co'sts cb�rq�d against or on accousst ot service to ]►st�rama'� prvperty and/or the pate.atial or eventual installation and conn�ction ot si�rvica lin�s sezving �lshra�a's proparty vther than s�rvict lines in the •asorment area that will slco sarve Nsdalisky�s property. 6. 'i`hfs Aqreesant may bo 6lgned in any nu�Dar a= countarparta or vith multipla siqnaturs paqas, or �+ith signature pages sent by taesiaile. �aeh auch siqnzture paqs sb►all be considsrsd an oriqinal, but toq4ther the documsnts tcz�n one 1�►qreement. 7 . I 7►ny diBputa im►elvi�q this I►qreen�ent ahall ba settled by bindi=eq arbitration with a sinqle arbitrator cho�en by ag=een�nt at tD� partia�, cr it thay cannet aqree on a sir�glo a=bltrator, then �andar thw rules o! llrbitration B�rvica o� Portland, Inc. Excgpt that the shsll bm noYm th�n one arbitratar_ BRAF� PRF.lSJ►NANDA ASHRAMA asl ,T. H is �• ,President By: Hharat Naik, Secretazy ' 2 - RGREP�'IENT c�►\ootst..I�.spr JUN-13-1��? ��72 A TRACT CQMPl�I$fD OF L14ND BfSCfilSED!N QfEDS BECORDfO AUGUST 10,t995 AS FEE ND'S 9505581p AND 950� PAAT OF THE iANO UESCRiBED tN DEED RECOR�ED AS FEE N0. 99p556Q8, RECOROS aF WASHINGTON COUIYI'Y _ SRUATED IN THE SaUTHEDIST QUARTER QF SECTI�N 35.Tf3VYNSHIF 1 SOUT}�,�AN6E 1 W�ST. W111d141FT7F MERlUI� ClTY Of TiGAAD,YYASHINGTUN CpU�TI IN THE S�FATE OF OAE6UN 8E1NG MORF PARTICULARLY DESCRlBED A5 FOLLC Cd11A15AE14fC1JYG AT TNE SOUTHWFST CORNEA OF 7FIE THOMAS A. STOTT OQNATION IAND CLAIM N0. 53; THEN( 2'D3'00'EAST, A QISTANCE OF 7sQ.34 F�T TO 7y� SQUTNfAST CDRNfR OF SAiD TRACT DESCii{8fD tN DEED REC Fff HD_85Q558fl8 dNQ THE'POfNT OF SEGtNNiNG';T}�F1yCE AL�NG TNE SOUTH[INE aF SAIO TRAC7 N�EiTH 87°57'( A Q13TANCF OF 50.D0 FEET; 7ttEKCE �EqY1N4 3AlD SQUTH llNE NOATH 2°p�pQ-EpST, A OtSTANCf OF 37.38 FEET NDftTt{49°06'Z3' WEST, A DiSTANGF OF 91.6H fEET TO THE HURfH UNE OF SA10 TAACT DESCRIB�II!N DEFD AfC( FEE NQ 95Q55gpg; T�{�NCE AtON6 SA(II I+iOtiTFf LfNE NOfi1H 87°58'19"' WfSt, A OtSFANCE QF 1Q7.57 FEFT NURTHWfST CDflNER OF SAIQ TRIiCT; THENCE AtONG THE WEST UNE OF SAfti TAACTS flECQR0E0 AS FFE IyO. 9505� 95055�12 NQATH 02°57'13' EA&7, A OtS7ANCE OF 283.41 fEET T8 TFiE Sp(JTHEAtY RIGH7 Of•4YAY UNE OF 57A7E � ND. 217; TTiEHCE AlON6 SAID R1GH7-Of-WaY 1!!VE ON A t1,319.t6 FQOT FiAQfIlS NON•TANt�N1" CUltVE CONCAYE SDUTHWES"T {CHORa 9EItRS SOUTii qg°34'qg- EIIST, _ 420.66 F�� A OISTANCE Of 41p,�g �ET TO A F lNTFRSECnON W1Tf! THE S�UTH UNF OF SAJO TAACT DESGR1BfD IAI DEED RECORDFD AS FEE NQ. 8505581Z SAIO ll 8E1N�TNE SQUT�i UNE�F LQT 19,BIOCK '0",'METZGEf{ACRF�iqC�S-.T�{�NCE ALUNfl SAfD SQUfH 11NE NQRTN 8! , WEST,A Dl3TANCE 0� 105.32 fffT TO TNE EAST LlNE QF SA1� TRAC7 OES�AIB£D IN D�EQ RECORDED AS fEE N0. 9E THENCf ALONG SQIp EAST LIN� QNO THE EAST UNF QF SAlff TRACT pESCRiBE� IN aE�D RECDROED A5 FEf NQ. 9: Sa�TM 2'�'�'WF57'.A Dl5711NCE Of 1]5.�7 FEEZ TO 7NE"POIHT OF BEGtA1NiN�', ECantams SB,133 squa.e teat,more or lessJ � .'� -- ---- -- �3iHi�� --.-___ _-.... PAG� s flf � . j-1�� 11�(�� . _ A 7RACT C014lPR1S�0 OF LAND DESCf�lBFD AS PARCEIS f, (I ANQ Ill IN DEFII RECORDEO JANUARr 5, 1995, R5 FEE N0, 85001169, RECOfiOS OF VYASHINGTON CQUNFI, OREGQN, SITIlQTED IN TFiE SOUT1iEAST aUAR7ER OF SECTION 35, rown►sHiP i s�uix. AANGE l WFST, W1LlAME7TE MERlDIAN 1N TH� CITY OF TlGARO, YYASHINGTON Ci�tlNT1(, OREGDN, IOGETNFR WJTIi THAT POHTION �F THE EANQ OES�RIBEO tN DEED RECOROED AUGUST 10, 1995, AS FEE NQ.950598t18,�i�COqDS DF WASH}NGTON COLINTY,�RE�O�f,MORE PARTICt1tARlY OESCRIBEO AS FQLLOWS: � CQMMENCIPl� qT THE SOUTHWEST CORNER OF THE THOMAS A. STOTT DONAFlON LAND CLAIM NQ. 53; TNEHCE NQRTN 2°Q3'00"fAST,A OISTANCE OF 150.39 FEET TO THE SQUTkFAST CURNER OF SAID TRACT QESCRJSED(H QEED AFCDRDEU AS F�E N0. 95055808; 7HENCE ALONG THE 50!]TH UNE QF SAtD TRACT NOATFf 87°57'OS" VYEST, A OISTANCE�F 5Q.Q0 FEFf TO THE"POINT aF BEGINN1fYG";�F4ENCE lEAV1NG SAlO S{IUTH LIiYf NORTN 2°03'a0"EA�T, A QlSTANCE QF 37.38 FfFT; TNENCE NOATH 48°D&'23"WFST, A DISTANCE QF 91.68 FEET TO TfiE NDRTN LINF QF SAI(] TRACT DFSCAIBFD 1N DEED RECUADEB AS EEE �i�. 95055808; THEIdCE ACQNG SAtD NDRTN UNE IYORTH 87°58'f9" INFST, A DtSTANCF OF 107.57 FEET TQ THE NO�THWEST C�RNER QF SA(0 TRACT; THENCE AIQNG TNE VYEST tINE OF SA1D TRACT SOIfFH Z°�7'13" WEST, A 0lSTANCE OF 94,86 FEET TO THE SOUTNWEST COFiHFE� OF SRlD TRACT; THENCE�AIONQ THE SOUTH L1NE OF SAtQ TRACT SDUTH 87°57'Bi" EAST,A DISTANCF QF 180.47 FEET TO TNE'PO1NT � QF BEGINNiN6'. � (Contains 90,067 s�v�e feet,more or fess) . � �XHI�IT ; , � PAG� # Of � . e.o e c� � o �` � LEWIS & VAN VLEET I n�o r p o r a[e d prin�ipals �hris�. van vleet. p.e. gary j. lewis. p.e. C�VIL CALCULATIONS FOR TEMPLE / ASH 1 i�15 SW Hall Boulevar�+ Tigard, Oregon FOR Geo Standards �,�� ''s�r ; ��i��,��- .. ,, ,{Y y,��' � �•.�ti . `�` `.�(.�1�i�j'\�' �\ C_ r'v� -'r `�- : 4� 1�.3:'?. �,.�� r� �':� : � �., <�"•" �` < °�'Y ��'�'�,� ^�\�c� r",. y � 5 .�.:- `t�n'r, ---_--- EXPIRES12/31/2000 Lewis & Van Vleet Inc. Job Number 98122 �onsulting engineers iB660 s.w. boQnes ferry road tualatin. oregon 9706Z [503) BBS.B6�5 phone [503] 885.120 6 fax LEW15• & �onsulting �ngineers Job T�n��E 18660 s.w. boones ferry road CliBnt GEO �D/1�,pS tualatin. aregon 97062 Job No. ��Z By B 5� [503J BBS.B605 phone [503]BB5.1z�6 fax VAN VLEET Date �Z'10�Q� Sheet No. j I n�o r p o r a[e d �� . ' �/�►ti- ; • �Jc_TE�.�noN - No-r �'� (SEE 5-ru�y �Qe�,��o B�i ��nK E�f�i�.i��s) � � a � r ` � whT�it. C�uAL�r/ - __ � Tl E�,J I n��viouS A� = I�{,4 v0 S � = U�33 a��s `' _ _. , � (�� = C�, 1Z c-Fs !� �a��rrvur i) . _.-,.____ � _ � �___ _. _ f _ _ _ _ _._, __ _._ � : C7vnoK J ' Exr��D '��! 17�.T�.url�n� �orvD .-- -_t_ _ � �/n�u.nc t4;40o sf (0.03 +�; = 43Z �� r_ 3 4 1 � � __.__�_. _ � � OpnoN Z'. �(;Eo� SvJk�E (�� N�our Z� M ��r�f = �0,i$��S� �°I n�N�(Go �/n,u� = ��.Z �f � I oo-�+ � . , (��-� C �`�-�� , s -� � D_c^�� o.OISr� • _ 9� Q� , . . , i. . d - o,14 �-i� : . . . _ . '_ k - - _ _ � , � ,._ . , . 3 _� :_ ;_..` _ �_ . : .._, , _ �.. .. �� . _. ; .._: ...,_.._. . _ � � � . , ,.. :_ �_ � C�oSG �r''71oN Z �3�0 - Sv�kL�� ; . { _.._ ._ : _. . _,._ _ . : ._ _:._�_;__.i_: _:_ • Ro u.TL E',vrrc.E �o,�n�,z !�u�lal-"r Tth�U 6 t/ S W�}L E ' �... .�. --,_. .: � � Q�� _ 0�3� G�'s �SEE �e�,v�our3� . ,_ _ _ _ _ .�./ _ _ _._�____ �EbCir! @ 5= 0,O 150 7�t ^ Z5-�F ____f�� 7ei,�l�uT�� U.rRE.a G-En(6rTf� _ ��'ZS��s� ��i h�µ�� (v�75��,v> = 135 �F _ �DEQn�+ _ ��35 ��Co�0�5��r� = 2,o �4- _.__._ �rN OF �i..oa/= 0. 24-£-1 �SEE 'Pe►�ur 4l _ ; . : , _ . � :_ _, �..:_. _ . _: _: __�.._.. .: � : k . ..... .� .._._.. . _.. ,_. � ..._.�, .___" _. _y. ' . ^-r ; 1 i ; � . : j '. � . . ..-.. . ._ ....... � . .... ...-.. ..t.._.i • P�� 5lZE Chwu�rr,-��u 5 - - _. _ . . _ . _; _ .. :_. , __ _, � ._�. a f USC TZkno�k� I'�E--rt{oD� ODOT z��lE -T �t-iN�f�� j�ENs�rr�s . ��s�� s� A-r-ntc}tEr� ��s�EC�r. _ �.�-- _ : _. _ ,..: _� __: ,__, . 1 . , {�� ' ��1'T�R �lkt,.ITy 12-io•qa KING COUNTY DEPARTMENT OF PUBLIC WORKS Surface Water Management Division QQ��T � HYDROGRAPH PROGRAMS Version 4 .21B SBUH/SCS METHOD FOR COMPUTING RUNOFF HYDROGRAPH STORM OPTIONS : 1 - S .C.S . TYPE-lA 2 - 7-DAY DESIGN STORM 3 - STORM DATA FILE SPECIFY STORM OPTION: 1 S.C.S . TYPE-lA RAINFALL DISTRIBUTION ENTER: FREQ (YEAR) , DUR.ATION (HOUR} , PRECIP {INCHES) 1, 4, . 36 ---------------------------------------------------------------------- ******************�'} S .C.S . TYPE-lA DISTRIBUTION ******************** ********* 1-YEAR 4-HOUR STORM **** . 36" TOTAL PRECIP. ********* ---------------------------------------------------------------------- ENTER: A(PERV) , CN (PERV) , A(IMPERV) , CN (IMPERV) , TC FOR BASIN NO. 1 0, 90, . 33, 98, 1 DATA PRINT-OUT: AREA(ACRES) PERVIOUS IMPERVIOUS TC (MINUTES) A CN A CN . 3 . 0 96. 8 . 3 99. 5 1 . 0 PEAK-Q (CFS) T-PEAK(HRS} VOL (CU-FT) . 12 .77 201 ENTER (d: ] [path] filename ( .ext] FOR STORAGE OF COMPUTED HYDROGRAPH: TEMPLE WQ - ��o- SWItt�E ' TEMPLE WATER QUALITY SWALE 1'GI1��T'Ot�LT Z+ Woricsheet for Trapezoidal Channel Project Description Project File d:lhaestadlfmw100storm.fm2 Worksheet SWALES Flow Element Trapezoidal Channe{ Method Manning's Formula Solve For Channel Depth Input Data Mannings Coefficient 0.250 Channel Slope 0.015000 ft!ft Left Side Slope 4.000000 H :V Right Side Slope 4.000000 H :V Bottom Width 4.00 ft Discharge 0.12 cfs —1 (�w4 Results �IE Depth 0.14 ft Flow Area 0.65 ftz Wetted Perimeter 5.18 ft Top Widtt� 5.15 ft Critical Depth 0.03 ft Critical Slope 2.962942 ft/ft alE Velocity �.18 ff/s Velocity Head 0.52e-3 ft Specific Energy 0.14 ft Froude Number 0.09 Flow is subcriticaL � O_14 ft _ I� -I � 4.00 ft V� H 4.0 NTS 12/10/98 FbwMaster v5.15 04:44:1 O PM Haestad Methods,Inc. 37 Brookside Road Waterbury,CT 08708 (203)755-1668 Page 1 of 1 --, . , TEI'IP�.E - � I C��`��t Sto�t'1 � 12• t� �9g KING COUNTY DEPARTMENT OF PUBLIC WORKS �l�NT � Surface Water Management Division HYDROGRAPH PROGRAMS Version 4 .21B SBUH/SCS METHOD FOR COMPUTING RUNOFF HYDROGRAPH STORM OPTIONS : 1 - S .C. S . TYPE-lA 2 - 7-DAY DESIGN STORM 3 - STORM DATA FILE SPECIFY STORM OPTION: 1 S .C.S . TYPE-lA R.AINFALL DISTRIBUTION ENTER: FREQ (YEAR} , DURATION(HOUR) , PRECIP (INCHES) 10, 24, 3 . 45 ---------------------------------------------------------------------- ******************** S .C.S . TYPE-lA DISTRIBUTION ******************** ********* 10-YEAR 24-HOUR STORM **** 3 . 45" TOTAL PRECIP. ********* ---------------------------------------------------------------------- ENTER: A(PERV) , CN (PERV) , A(IMPERV) , CN (IMPERV) , TC FOR BASIN NO. 1 0, 90, . 33, 98, 5 DATA PRINT-OUT: AREA(ACRES} PERVIOUS IMPERVIOUS TC (MINUTES) A CN A CN . 3 . 0 90 . 0 . 3 98 . 0 5. 0 PEAK-Q (CFS) T-PEAK(HRS) VOL {CU-FT) . 30 7 . 67 3853 ENTER [d: ] [path] filename [ .ext] FOR STORAGE OF COMPUTED HYDROGR.APH: TEMPLE 10 YR STORM . , '[��u - Sv�14L�. � ' TEMPLE WATER QUALITY SWALE Q��1yT�tdT � Worksheet for Trapezoidal Channel , Project Description Project File d:Ihaestadlfmw100storm.fm2 Worksheet SWALES Fiow Element Trapezoidal Channel Method Manning's Formula Solve For Channel Depth Input Data Mannings Coefficient 0.250 Channel Slope 0.015000 ft/ft Left Side Slope 4.000000 H :V Right Side Slope 4.000000 H :V Bottom Width 4.00 ft Discharge 0.30 cfs --� (,t�� Resufts � Depth 0.24 ft Flow Area 1.20 tt2 Wetted Perimeter 6.00 ft Top Width 5.94 ft Critical Depth 0.05 ft Critical Slope 2.447820 ft/ft � Velocity 0.25 ft/s Velocity Head 0.97e-3 ft Specific Energy 0.24 ft Froude Number 0.10 Flow is subcritical. � 0.24 ft _ I _l , 4.00 ft V� H 4.0 NTS 12J14/98 FlowMaster v5.15 01:0235 PM Haestad Methods,Inc. 37 Brookside Road Waterbury,CT 06708 (203)755-1666 Page 1 of 1 ; � � e :I . . Pro�ect No. q�1Z�— l]eslpned by_ �S.D [)ato�_/_S- 9 9--cn�:k�i r�y_<<S� Dalo ---- . . ; Pro�eci Nam� T��-�- A5H�/1t'� ^ ^ Page I ol f�_— p�SIGN DESIGN CALCUI..ATIONS DESIGN INVEf�T SECTION EQUIV. ToTAL FlUr�oFf vE�oc ELEVATIONS INCR. TOTAL INTEN- INC�. RUNOFF CAPA- INCR. EQUIV. RUNOFF SI.OPE [)IA VELOC. / �n IENGTII AIN.TO MN. T1ME 71ME SITY AREA COEFF. CITY AREA AREA CAPAC. OrOi �R T Tt I A C CA ECA q S d U Vi O�qi y C UPPER LOWEFI ST.TO ST. minutes minutes In/hr. 6ae� ooeft. ectes acres ds yo Incties ds s ieUo �f s lool u�ST ; R�p�.E. � � 5,0 5.o z, io o,os7 0,9 o•n5� o,o� � o,i � 5,0 � o,�l 5,33 I�SB zZ400 z�4.�o �'`� � �! �° AD I 5'� 5. 0 Z,10 n.d 57 0,9 D,o51 0.051 O, I I Z,25 � o,� l 4•0 0 2 7 zi5.5o Z1�,�9 � �� si �,ZZ. --5o zw,�o z�a,c�o � � p,pz 0� 1 5, 1 z.o9 o.o1q 0�9 O�or7 o,oco� 0�1� D,�q �o o� --� � �t>z �.I o,� 5,5 z,o� o.oz5 �,9 a,oz3 0, 09� 0,�9 c�,4o � 0,51 z,�z �3 Zi4,c�o z�4.� � , � � m J1 sz o.2 5,� z,oz — — -- o,��Z o,zq a,4c� � 0�51 �,�q- -- $o zi�,4 z� � 7 4,15 � a rn - � cn �o" 5,0 5,o z, �c� o.o6s� o•q o�l o,o�� 50 4 o��q z.3� � cB o� �3 0 � �13 ZIl,So Z 17.0o Z c� - - - - - - -- �n Sz.. 0•(0 5. (o z,o3 O.o�1$ o.Cl O.U�S6 0,14q 5,77 � " -- o.30 3,i o 4 0,�4-$ _ 9 0 ti►1,ao z iq.z+ v -- - — — - - - :�, s� v�A� ��S �.2. 1.vb — — -- e,zgo 0.4� o,�►o c� 0,51 z,91� 3� zi4,�s z�� o0 � � 70 . � � , � N - -- --- - -- N , . � �_�_� . , $ �ITY �F TI�ARD _ �.x �.. frr ;: PRE-APPLICATION C�NFERENCE NOTES ��D�� [Pre-Application Meeting Notes are Valid for S�c[6)Monthsl S�pi,��°�,�� NON-RESIDENTIAL PRE•APP.MTG.DATE: s STAFF AT PRE-APP.: INI.C�LPr IQ IP� APPLICANT: t3 V`a�wt c� � re ltita vta�+�ta �S�I�Q u., A6ENT: Sa c,� /¢��;`�vtv� Phone:[ l Phone: [ l PROPERTY LOCATION: ADDRESS/GEN.LOCATION: 1 1 S l s c.t� l�/a l I �a a�Lv TAI�MAP(Sl/LOT#[Sl: `— �o s / NECESSARY APPLICATION[Sl: �o��`o�d f 'Ll 5� ��e✓vu I�" �-cc.Q S s �/4.v�a ul�- � PROPOSALDESCRIPTION: 1�u�I� a c ��vc� a�a� Lo�v�.� a �exi 1� v� f �e � c COMPREHENSIVE PLAN MAP DESI6NATION: �o wt w��.�c I�� VO�ssl��t� �-(P ZONIN6 MAP DESIGNATION: �o��r�1a� � P-ess 1 �C d' Se.e v1.��i�l�o CJ.T.AREA: �as�` FACILITATOR: wtcc�� td PHONE: [5031 ZONING DISTRICT DIMENSIONAL REQUIREMENTS MINIMUM LOT SIZE:Zo,�sq. ft. Average lot width: 5o ft. Maximum building height: �'1 S ft. Setbacks: Front 2� ft. Side 2� ft. Rear�_ft. Comer��ft. from street. MAXIMUM SITE COVERAGE: �s5 % Mini�um landscaped or natural vegetation area: f5 %. [Reter to Code Sect�on 18. i o i I r 0 d,� +C's, 6V, o5p ADDITIONAI LOT OIMENSIONAL RE REMENTS MINIMUM LOT FRONTA E: 25 feet unless lot is created through the minor land partition process. Lots created as part of a p 'tion must have a minimum of 15 feet of frontage or have a minimum 15- foot wide access easement. The DEPTH OF ALL LOTS NOT EXCEED 2� TIMES THE AVERAGE WIDTH, unless the parcel is less than 1�times the min um lot size of the applicable zoning district. [Refer to Code Secdon 18.164.060-Lo CRY OF nGARO Pre-Appqcatlon Comeronce Notes Pape 1 tl 1� r��•aa■nai�uie.n..�n.■■io�onn:ie.:•en.. � � S�ECIAL SETBACKS ➢ STREETS: � ol feet from th�e centerline of ➢ ESTABLISHED AREAS: �jr�-- feet from �t ➢ LOWER INTENSITY ZONES: �J�i feet, along the site's �f4 boundary. ➢ FLAG LOT: 10-FOOT SI DE YARD SETBACK.�a��.per��a�I �oy � u� �7`a��-r' [Refer to Code Secdon and 18.961 ( SPECIAL BUILDIN6 NE16NT PROYISIONS BUILDING HEIGHT EXCEPTIONS - Buildings located in a non-residential zone may be built to a height of 75 feet provided that: ➢ A maximum building floor area to site area ratio (FAR) of 1.5 to 1 will exist; ➢ All actual building setbacks will be at least half (�h) of the building's height; and ➢ The structure will not abut a residential zoned district. tRefer to Code Sectlon 18.98.0201 PARKING AND ACCESS �-�o��:�Y ��.-� REQUIRED parking for this type of use: �a .ao� a� 5 v , Parking SHOWN on preliminary plan(s): � ., 1 SECONDARY USE REQUIRED parking: rt e�s�e�,•,� „ � � Parking SHOWN on preliminary plan(s): NO MORE THAN 40% of required spaces may be designated and/or dimensioned as compact I spaces. I� PARKING STALLS shall be dimensioned as follows: I ➢ Standard parking space dimensions: 8 feet, 8 inches x 18 feet. � ➢ Compact parking space dimensions: 8 feet x 15 feet. ,I Note: Parking space width inctudes the width of a stripe that separates the parking space from an adjoining space. Note: A maximum of three(3)feet of the vehicle ovefiang area in front of a wheel stop or curb can be included as paR of required parking space depth. This area cannot be included as landscaping for meeting the minimum perce�tage requirements. [Refer to Code Sectlon 18.106.0201 Handicapped Parking: ➢ All parking areas shall PROVIDE APPROPRIATELY LOCATED AND DIMENSIONED DISABLED PERSON PARKING spaces. The minimum number of disabled person parking spaces to be provided, as well as the parking stall dimensions, are mandated by the Americans � with Disabilities Act (ADA). A handout is available upon request. A handicapped parking space � symbol shall be painted on the parking space surface and an appropriate sign shall be posted. � ➢ BICYCLE RACKS ARE REQUIRED FOR MULTI-FAMILY, COMMERCIAL AND INDUSTRIAL DEVELOPMENTS. Bicycle racks shall be located in areas protected from automobile traffic and in convenient locations. Bicycle parking spaces shall be provided on the basis of one space for every fifteen (15) required vehicular parking spaces. 1 Minimum number of accesses:�Z Minimum access width: 2 a� 3G � ' 1 Minimum pavement width: `�- a� �-`l ' '1� S�-eFo�cass vav�aw�c� � All driveways and parking areas, except for some fleet storage parking areas, must be paved. ' Drive-in use queuing areas: � ��effl[to Code Sectlon 18J06 and 18.1 8l _ _�- CRY OF TI6ARD Pro-Appllcatlop CoNeronce Motes Pape 2 a 1� N�Ma��t��tl�l��Ile�tluRl�utq�Msl��Satln � , �,- _--- -------- WALKW�Y REQUIREMENTS WALKWAYS SHALL EXTEND FROM THE GROUND FLOOR ENTRANCES OR FROM THE GROUND FLOOR LANDING OF STAIRS, ramps, or elevators of all commercial, institutional, and industrial uses, to the streets which provide the required access and egress. Walkways shall provide . � convenient connections between buildings in multi-building commercial, institutional, and industrial complexes. Unless impractical, walkways should be constructed between a new development and neighboring developments. - [Referto Coda Secdon 18.108.0501 ___--_ �---------- — _ � —----- ---- LOMING AREA REQ NTS Every COMME CIAL OR INDUSTRIAL BUILDING IN EXCESS OF 10,000 S�UARE FEET shall be provided with a ' g space. The space size and location shall be as approved by the City Engineer. [Refer to Code Se on 18.106.070-0901 - _ ------- --- CLEAR VISI�IfAR - --- ' The City requires that CLEAR VISION AREAS BE MAINTAINED BETWEEN THREE AND EIGHT FEET IN HEIGHT at road/driveway, road/railroad, and road/road intersections. The size of the required clear vision area depends upon the abutting street's functional classification. [Refer to Code Secdon 18J021 BUFFERIN6 AND SCREENIN6 In order TO INCREASE PRIVACY AND TO EITHER REDUCE OR ELIMINATE ADVERSE NOISE OR VISUAL IMPACTS between adjacent developments, especially between different land uses, the City requires landscaped buffer areas along certain site perimeters. Required buffer areas are described by the Code in terms of width. Buffer areas must be occupied by a mixture of deciduous and evergreen trees and shrubs and must also achieve a balance between vertical and horizontal plantings. Site obscuring screens or fences may also be required; these are often advisable even if not required by the Code. The required buffer areas may o� be occupied by vegetation, fences, utilities, and walkways. Additional information on required buffer area materials and sizes may be found in the Development Code. [Refer to Code Chapter 18.1001 The REQUIRED BUFFER WIDTHS which are applicable to vour proposal area are as follows: �? feet along north boundary. ti /o feet along east boundary. feet along south boundary. feet along west boundary. IN ADDITION, SIGHT OBSCURING SCREENING IS REQUIRED ALONG: LANDSCAPIN6 --�'� - -- -- � -- STREET TREES ARE REQUIRED FOR ALL DEVELOPMENTS FRONTING ON A PUBLIC OR ' PRIVATE STREET as well as driveways which are more than 100 feet in length. Street trees must i be placed either within the public right-of-way or on private property within six (6) feet of the right-of- way boundary. Street trees must have a minimum caliper of at least two (2) inches when measured four (4) feet above grade. Street trees should be spaced 20 to 40 feet apart depending on the branching width of the proposed tree species at maturity. Further information on regulations affecting street trees may be obtained from the Planning Division. A MINIMUM OF ONE (1) TREE FOR EVERY SEVEN (7) PARKING SPACES MUST BE PLANTED in and around all parking areas in order to provide a vegetative canopy effect. Landscaped parking areas shall include special design features which effectively screen the parking lot areas from view. These design features may include the use of landscaped berms, decorative walls, and raised planters. For detailed information on design requirements for parking areas and accesses. [Reter to Code Cdaptera 18.100,18.106 and 18.1081 CRY OFTI6ARD Pro-AppUcatlw Coa(eronce Notes Pape 3 N11 r�r-�•a�.■aa�y�uc.n•.rna..i■��M�..a•on.. SIGNS SIGN PERMITS MUS BE OBTAINED PRIOR TO INSTALLATION OF ANY SIGN in the City of Tigard. A "Guidelines Sign Permits" handout is available upon request. Additional sign area or height beyond Code stan ards may be permitted if the sign proposal is reviewed as part of a development review appli ation. Altematively, a Sign Code Exception application may be filed for review before the Hearings icer. [Reter to Code Secdon 1 1141 SENS S The Co provides REGULATIONS FOR LANDS WHICH ARE POTENTIALLY UNSUITABLE FOR DEVELO MENT DUE TO AREAS WITHIN THE 100-YEAR FLOODPLAIN, NATURAL DRAINA EWAYS, WETLAND AREAS, ON SLOPES IN EXCESS OF 25 PERCENT, OR ON UNSTA E GROUND. Staff will attempt to preliminary identify sensitive lands areas at the pre- application co ference based on available information. HOWEVER, the responsibilitv to preciselv identif sensiti lands areas and their boundaries is the res onsibili of the a licant. Areas meetin the de i ' ions of sensitive lands must be clearl indicated on lans submitted with the develo ment a li tion. Chapter 18.84 also rovides regulations for the use, protection, or modification of sensitive lands areas. RESIDENTIAL VELOPMENT IS PROHIBITED WITHIN FLOODPLAINS. [Refer to Code Sectl 18.841 STEEP When TEEP SLOPES exist, prior to issuance of a final order, a geotechnical report must be submitted 'ch addresses the approval standards of the Tigard Community Development Code Section 18.84. .B. The report shall be based upon field exploration and investigation and shall include specific r mmendations for achieving the requirements of 18.84.040.B.2 and 18.84.040.8.3. UNIFIEO SEINERAGE AGENCY NSAI BUf�ER STANDAR R g 0 96-44 LAND DEVELOPMENT ADJACENT TO S NSITIVE AREAS shall preserve and maintain or create a vegetated corridor for a buffer wide enou h to protect the water quality functioning of the sensitive area. DesiQn Criteria: The VEGETATED CORRIDOR SHALL BE A M IMUM OF 25-FEET-WIDE, measured horizontally, from the defined boundaries of the sensitive area except where approval has been granted by the Agency or City to reduce the width of a portion of th corridor. If approval is granted by the Agency or City to reduce the width of a portion of the vegetate corridor, then the surface water in this area shall be directed to an area of the vegetated corridor t t is a minimum of 25 feet wide. The maximum allowable encroachment shall be 15 feet, except allowed in Section 3.11.4. No more than 25 percent of the length of the vegetated corridor within t e development or project site can be less than 25 feet in width. In any case, the average width of th vegetated corridor shall be a minimum of 25 feet. Restrictions in the Veqetate Corridor: NO structures, development, construction activities, ardens, lawns, application of chemicals, dumping of any materials of any kind, or other activities hall be permitted which otherwise detract from the water quality protection provided by the vegetated c idor, except as allowed below: ➢ A GRAVEL WALKWAY OR BIKE PATH, NOT EXCEEDIN 8 FEET IN WIDTH. If the walkway or bike path is paved, then the vegetated corridor must be wi ened by the width to the path. A paved or gravel walkway or bike path may not be construc d closer than 10 feet from the boundary of the sensitive area, unless approved by the Agen or City. Walkways and bike paths shall be constructed so as to minimize disturbance to existin�vegetation; and � CRY OF T16AR0 Pn-AppOcatloq CoNeronce Netes Pape 4 N 1� N�IF#�sl��tl�l YrllatlaRlu�lq/M:In E�etln , � � ➢ WATER QUALITY F, �LITIES may ncroach into the vege�. .d corridor a maximum of 10 feet with the approval of the Agency or Ci . Location of Veqetated Corridor: IN ANY RESIDENTIAL DEVELOPMENT WHIC CREATES MULTIPLE PARCELS or lots intended for separate ownership, such as a subdivision, the etated corridor shall be contained in a separate tract, and shall not be a part of any parcel to be used f r the construction of a dwelling unit. [Reier to R a 0 96-44/USA Regulatlons-Chapter 3,De tor SWMI WATER RESOURCES OVERIAY ICT The WATER RESOU S (WR) OVERLAY DISTRICT implements the policies of the Tigard Comprehensive Plan and 's intended to resolve conflicts between development and conservation of significant wetlands, s reams and riparian corridors identified in the City of Tigard Local Wetlands Inventory. Spec' ically, this chapter allows reasonable economic use of property while establishing clear and o jective standards to: protect significant wetlands and streams; limit development in designate riparian corridors; maintain and enhance water quality; maximize flood storage capacity; preserv native plant cover; minimize streambank erosion; maintain and enhance fish and wildlife habita ; and conserve scenic, recreational and educational values of water resource areas. Safe Harbor: The WR OVERLAY DIS ICT ALSO MEETS THE RE�UIREMENTS OF STATEWIDE PLANNING GOAL 5 (Natural Resources nd the "safe harbo�' provisions of the Goal 5 administrative rule (OAR 660, Division 23). These pro ' ions require that "significant" wetlands and riparian corridors be mapped and protected. The Tua tin River, which is also a �fish-bearing stream," has an average annual flow of more than 1000 cfs. Maior Streams: Streams which are mapped as "FISH- EARING STREAMS" by the Oregon Department of Forestry and have an average annual flow less t an 1000 cubic feet per second (cfs). ➢ Major streams in Tigard includ FANNO CREEK, ASH CREEK (EXCEPT THE NORTH FORK AND OTHER TRIBUTARY REEKS� AND BALL CREEK. Minor Streams: Streams which are NOT "FISH-BEARING S EAMS" according to �regon Department of Forestry maps . Minor streams in Tigard include Sum er Creek, Derry Dell Creek, Red Rock Creek, North Fork of Ash Creek and certain short tributaries o he Tualatin River. Riparian Setback Area: This AREA IS MEASURED HORIZONTALLY FR AND PARALLEL TO MAJOR STREAM OR � TUALATIN RIVER TOP-OF-BANKS, OR THE EDGE AN ASS�CIATED WETLAND, whichever is greater. The riparian setback is the same as the " iparian corridor boundar�' in OAR 660-23- 090(1)(d). ➢ The standard TUALATIN RIVER RIPARIAN ETBACK IS 75 FEET, unless modified in accordance with this chapter. ➢ The MAJOR STREAMS RIPARIAN SETBACK I 50 FEET, unless modified in accordance with this chapter. ➢ ISOLATED WETLANDS AND MINOR STREAM (including adjacent wetlands) have no riparian setback; however, a 25-foot "water quality bu e�' is required under Unified Sewerage Agency (USA) standards adopted and administered by e City of Tigard. [Refer to Code Secdon 18.85.0101 Cti1f OF T16ARD Pre-Appqcatloa Centeronce Notes Pag�5 d 10 N�N��I��tlal p�lle�tl�drl�ule�iMsln S�etln , � Riparian Setback Reductlon The DIRECTOR MAY A PROVE A SITE-SPECIFIC REDUCTION OF THE TUALATIN RIVER OR ANY MAJOR STREAM IPARIAN SETBACK BY AS MUCH AS 50% to allow the placement of structures or impervious surfaces otherwise prohibited by this chapter, provided that equal or better protection for identified ajor stream resources is ensured through streambank restoration and/or enhancement of riparian vegetation in preserved portions of the riparian setback area. Eli ibili for Ri arian Setback in isturbed Areas. TO BE ELIGIBLE FOR A RIPA IAN SETBACK REDUCTION, the applicant must demonstrate that the riparian corridor was subs antially disturbed at the time this regulation was adopted. This determination must be based on the Vegetation Study required by Section 18.85.050.0 that demonstrates all of the followin : ➢ Native plant species curre cover less than 80%of the on-site riparian corridor area; > The tree canopy currently overs less than 50% of the on-site riparian corridor and healthy trees have not been remov d from the on-site riparian setback area for the last five years; ➢ That vegetation was not re oved contrary to the provisions of Section 18.85.050 regulating removal of native plant speci s; ➢ That there will be no infringem t into the 100-year floodplain; and ➢ The average slope of the riparia area is not greater than 20%. [Refer to Code Secdon 18.85.1001 TREE REMOVAL PLAN REQUIREMENTS A TREE PAN FOR THE PLANTING, REMOVAL AND PROTECTION OF TREES prepared by a certified arborist shall be provided for any lot, parcel or combination of lots or parcels for which a development application for a subdivision, major partition, site development review, planned development or conditional use is filed. Protection is preferred over removal where possible. THE TREE PLAN SHALL INCLUDE the following: ➢ Identification of the location, size and species of all existing trees including trees designated as significant by the City; ➢ Identification of a program to save existing trees or mitigate tree removal over 12 inches in caliper. Mitigation must follow the replacement guidelines of Section 18.150.070.D. according to the following standards: b Retainage of less than 25% of existing trees over 12 inches in caliper requires a mitigation program according to Section 18.150.070.D. of no net loss of trees; b Retainage of from 25 to 50% of existing trees over 12 inches in caliper requires that two-thirds of the trees to be removed be mitigated according to Section 18.150.070.D; b Retainage of from 50 to 75% of existing trees over 12 inches in caliper requires that 50% of the trees to be removed be mitigated according to Section 18.150.070.D; a Retainage of 75% or greater of existing trees over 12 inches in caliper requires no mitigation; � Identification of all trees which are proposed to be removed; and ➢ A protection program defining standards and methods that will be used by the applicant to protect trees during and after construction. TREES REMOVED WITHIN THE PERIOD OF ONE (1) YEAR PRIOR TO A DEVELOPMENT APPLICATION LISTED ABOVE will be inventoried as part of the tree plan above and will be replaced according to Section 18.150.070.D. [Refer to Code Sectlon 18.150.025) CRY OF T16ABD Pro-AppOcatlon Ceaferonce Metes �aoe B N 11 r��•�r•■na iwue.o..rn.■■i■��w�.■s.en.. � � � , MmsnnoN REPLACEMENT OF A TREE shall take place according to the following guidelines: ➢ A replacement tree shall be a substantially similar species considering site characteristics. ➢ If a replacement tree of the species of the tree removed or damages is not reasonably available, the Director may allow replacement with a different species of equivalent natural resource value. ➢ If a replacement tree of the size cut is not reasonably available on the local market or would not be viable, the Director shall require replacement with more than one tree in accordance with the following formula: ➢ The number of replacement trees required shall be determined by dividing the estimated caliper size of the tree removed or damaged, by the caliper size of the largest reasonably available replacement trees. If this number of trees cannot be viably located on the subject property, the Director may require one (1) or more replacement trees to be planted on other property within the city, either public property or, with the consent of the owner, private property. ➢ The planting of a replacement tree shall take place in a manner reasonably calculated to allow growth to maturity. IN LIEU OF TREE REPLACEMENT under Subsection D of this section, a party may, with the consent of the Director, elect to compensate the City for its costs in performing such tree replacement. [Refer to Cada Secdon 18.150.070 tDl NARRATIVE The APPLICANT SHALL SUBMIT A NARRATIVE which provides findings based on the applicable � approval standards. Failure to provide a narrative or adequately address criteria would be reason to �� consider an application incomplete and delay review of the proposal. ' [R�fer to Code Sectlon 18.321 1 vi�s.3�Z �i(S.6y�p , CODE SECTIONS -- ste��5 �' _ 18.80 _ 18.92 ?�.102 _ 18.116 _ 18.150 18.84 18.96 �✓fS.106 18 120 18.160 18.85 1�8. 8 �108,�«Q�'� �130�f,�� 1 .162 �i _ 18.88 ✓r8.100 _ 18.114 v��w�_ 18.134 �.164 I �'IMPACT STUDY As a part of the APPLICATION SUBMITTAL REQUIREMENTS, applicants are required to � INCLUDE IMPACT STUDY with their submittal package. The impact study shall quantify the effect of the development on public facilities and services. The study shall address, at a minimum, the transportation system, including bikeways, the drainage system, the parks system, the water system, the sewer system and the noise impacts of the development. For each public facility system and type of impact, the study shall propose improvements necessary to meet City standards, and to minimize the impact of the development on the � public at large, public facilities systems, and affected private property users. In situations ; where the Community Development Code requires the dedication of real property interests, ; the applicant shall either specifically concur with the dedication requirement, or provide i evidence which supports the concfusion that the real property dedication requirement is not roughly proportional to the projected impacts of the development. � [Refer to Code Chapier 18.32,Sectlon.0501 � _ _�__ -- CITy Of T16ARD Pro-Apppc�tlea Coateronce Notes Pspe]ot 1� Me�•��..na w�uem..rn�..�■��w�:�•.a�en•■ . � , 1 WHEN A CONDITION OF APPROVAL REQUIRES TRANSFER TO THE PUBLIC OF AN I INTEREST IN REAL PROPERTY, the approval authority shall adopt findings which support the �i conclusion that the interest in real property to be transferred is roughly proportional to the impact the J proposed development will have on the public. / [Refer to Code Chapier 18.32.Sectlon.2501 __ _ - NEI6NBORHOOD MEETING THE APPLICANT SHALL NOTIFY ALL PROPERTY OWNERS WITHIN 250 FEET AND THE APPROPRIATE CIT FACILITATOR AND THE MEMBERS OF ANY LAND USE SUBCOMMITfEE(S) of their proposal. A minimum of 2 weeks between the mailing date and the meeting date is required. Please review the Land Use Notification handout conceming site posting and the meeting notice. Meetinq is to be held prior to submittinq vour application or the application will not be accepted. [Refer to ihe Neigh6ordood Meetlng Nandoutl SUBDIVISION PLAT NAME RESERVATIO PRIOR TO SUBMITTING SUBDIVISION LAND USE APPLICATION with the City of Tigard, applicant's are re uired to co lete and file a subdivision plat naming request with the Washington County Surveyor's Office in der to obtain approvaVreservation for any subdivision name. Applications will not be accepte complete until the City receives the faxed confirmation of approval from the County of the Subdiv ion Name Reservation. [County SurueYors Office: 503-648-8 --- -- B IU�LDIN6 PERMITS — --�---- -- PLANS FOR BUILDING AND OTHER RELATED PERMITS WILL NOT BE ACCEPTED FOR REVIEW UNTIL A LAND USE APPROVAL HAS BEEN ISSUED. Final inspection approvals by the Building Division will not be granted until there is compliance with all conditions of development approval. These pre-application notes do not include comments from the Building Division. For proposed buildings or madifications to existing buildings, it is I recommended to contact a Building Division Plans Examiner to determine if there are building code isswes that would prevent the structure from being constructed, as proposed. i Additionally, with regard to Subdivisions and Minor Land Partitions where any structure to be demolished has system development charge (SDC) credits and the underlying parcel for that structure will be eliminated when the new plat is recorded, the Citv's policv is to applv those svstem development credits to the first buildinq permit issued in the development (UNLESS OTHERWISE DIRECTED BY THE DEVELOPER AT THE T1ME IN WHICH THE DEMOLITION PERMIT I OBTAINED.) RECrcuNs Applicant should CONTACT FRANCHISE HAULER FOR REVIEW AND APPROVAL OF SITE SERVICING COMPATIBILITY with Pride Disposal's vehicles. CONTACT PERSON: Lenny Hing with Pride Disposal at (503) 625-6177. [Refer to Code Sectlon 18.1161 CIT1f OF T16ARD Prs-Appncatl�o Ceeferoace Notes hpe!W 1� N�N-t.sU..n�14�natlnRl.■ah�url�l..s.en.. � ADDITIONAL CONCERNS OR COMMEA._. �— s� ' w�`� 1 v rf' � e r PROCEDURE �dministrative Staff Review. ublic hearing before the Land Use Hearings Officer. Public hearing before the Planning Commission. Public hearing before the Planning Commission with the Commission making a recommendation on the proposal to the City Council. An additional public hearing shall be held by the City Council. APPIICATIOH SUBMITTAL PROCESS All APPLICATIONS MUST BE ACCEPTED BY A PLANNING DIVISION STAFF MEMBER of the Community Development Department at Tigard City Hall offices. PLEASE NOTE: Applications submitted bV mail or dropped off at the counter without Planninq Division acceptance may be returned. Applications will NOT be accepted after 3:00 P.M. on Fridavs or 4:30 on other week davs• Maps submitted with an application shall be folded IN ADVANCE to 8.5 bv 11 inches. One (1), 8�h" x 11"_map of a proposed prolect should be submitted for attachment to the staff report or administrative decision. Application with unfolded maps shall not be accepted. The Planning Division and Engineering Division will perform a preliminary review of the application and will determine whether an application is complete within 30 days of the counter submittal. Staff will notify the applicant if additional information or additional copies of the submitted materials are required. The administrative decision or public hearing will typically occur approximately 45 to 60 days after an application is accepted as being complete by the Planning Division. Applications involving difficult or protracted issues or requiring review by other jurisdictions may take additional time to review. Written recommendations from the Planning staff are issued seven (7) days prior to the public hearing. A 10-20 day public appeal period follows all land use decisions. An appeal on this matter would be heard by the Tigard � �o� �aN�c1 I . A basic flow chart which illustrates the review process is available from th Planning Division upon request. This PRE-APPLICATION CONFERENCE AND THE NOTES OF THE CONFERENCE ARE INTENDED TO INFORM the prospective applicant of the primary Community Development Code requirements applicable to the potential development of a particular site and to allow the City staff and prospective applicant to discuss the opportunities and constraints affecting development of the site. CRY OF T16ARD he-AppUc�tlw CeNeroace Netes P�pe 9�t 1� N�IH�sl��tld y/Ilatln/f1aW/�Mtl��S�Ctla PLEASE NOTE: The conference and notes cannot coyer all Coda requirements and aspects of goad aRa planning that shouid apply to tha deuelopme� of your site plan. Failure of the statf to pro�ida i�ormatlon required by the Code ahali not cona�ute a waiuer of tha appllcable standards or requir�me�a. R is recommended that a prospecdve applicam either obtain and read ihe Community DeVelopmertt Code or ask am�quesdons of City statf relatl�e to Code requirements prlor to submit�ng an applicatlon. AN ADDITIONAL PRE-APPLICATION FEE AND CONFERENCE WILL BE RE�UIRED IF AN APPLICATION PERTAINING TO THIS PRE-APPLICATION CONFERENCE IS SUBMITTED AFTER A PERIOD OF MORE THAN SIX (6) MONTHS FOLLOWING THIS CONFERENCE (unless deemed as unnecessary by the Planning Division). PREPAREO BY: G��° ��°uo� CITY OF T16ARD PLANNIN6 DMSION - STAFF PERSOM NOLDIN6 PRE-APP.MEETIN6 PHONE [5031639,4171 FNL• [5031684-1297 E-MAIL• (staf f-3 f�rst name 1�Ci.tlgerd.or.us kunav.mn.uc.nw.�n�..0 (F��lu�Mn S�etl��wRumq-e.��) OWqt 2i�lri-9� CRY OF T16ARD Pre-App�atl�n Ceoferoace Notes Page 10 et 1� M�IH�sI/�ttl�l Aplltatl�UM�utq�Mtln futln .. . n- ----- __------_..— --- — -�---- --- - . _._.. - ---- -- �-.---� ----------- — --_____ __._---� -- n PRE-APPLICATION CONFERENCE NOTES � � � . �� •- ENGINEERIN� SECTION `� CltyofTigardi0regon � i�r� r_twiitq_�-� ,��,:�r.: ; �haputq�Betfer('cmtrntuiirr; �... - _ �S� �SD,� PUBLIC FACILITIES TF�e E��r� _ .�_: :�t the pre-application conferenca is to � ��°� / �&� (1 .) I�i�nhfy applicable Comprehensive Plan policies anr.l ;rriinance provisions. (2.) T�, provide City staff an opportunity t� cornment on sF��cific; concerns. (3.1 � � ��view the l_and Use Application review process U; rh the applicant and i�-ntify who the final decision making authority sha�' r�� ror the application. Tne ��x'.r��•��: �_�* r;�cessary public improvements and dedicatio:,> ,�.'��ich shall be required of the applicnn� will be r��c:�mrr,ended by City staff and subject to approval �� Tr�e appropriate authority. There �viil be no final recommendation to the decision making authority or� behalf of the City staff until all cancerned commer�ting agencies, City staff and the public have had an opportunity to review and comment on the appl�r.a:�or�. The following comments are a �roiection af puh��c improvement related requirern��nts that may he required as a condition of development approvai for your �roposed r�roject. Riqfii-oT_��tia�dedication: The City o� T�gard requires that land area be dedicated to tI�E pubiic. (1 j Te �n;,rease abutting pubiic rights-of-way to the ultimate iunchonal street ciassification �ig��t-ot-+r�ay width as specified by the C��mmunity D��.�-:!^r•rr��nt Code; or (2.) For ih� creaticn of new streets. Ap�r:;�: :' - ., �.;e��lopment application for th�� ;�tc �,n�ill requ�� :��t �,f-�.lvay dedication for: ( ) to reet fr�m centerline i t0 '��' frOm �' rltPrlire. ( 1 to ��et from en me. Street ;r�r��_�_�;�,,:�ments: ( j .__ street improveme�nts wili be necess ��; {��c.� ___ �' � � � � street imgrove ents wiil be � ,cessa ��i�>��g - --- — / . � � ----- -- ) treet in provement on _ _ hali �nc� e ___ fee of pavement f� :�� centerli e, plus t installat� n of cur and gutte s. stor se�r�e s under ro d placemen± i �rt�l�ty ires (a f may be c�ollected determine a�pro r�ata by the En me ing Departrner,��; a f�ve- oot wid sidewalk ( idewal r7iay be req ired t� b2 wid �n a eriai or major coilectc�r st�ee s, or i the Central usine s District), ne essa �� street s gns � nd tra fic control de�ne�as str�;=tliqhts and a two ye r stre tlighting fee. O Stre�t ir provements ont st��a'� ��.�!ude feet of pavement i��,�� c��nte ne, plus the inst Ilat� n of curb and gutters storrri sewers, underground placerr��r�! �� CITY OF TIGARD Pre-ApplicaUon Confe�ence Notes `�- Page 1 of 5 Engfneering Oepartment SecUon . . � ' ' Jii�lt'y VI�C�ES �c� 4t:t� f �)t� i,Ui G''"tc._i � ic �i ��i��_ .1 .:'f�t,�:��,' � by t�l�J �fl'��i?c. . � L' (', � ', , �_ � five-foot wide sidewaik (sidewaiks may be required to bc wid r on arterials or major collector str� ts. or in the Central Business Districtl. necessary stree si s and traffic c�ntr�i ;1��;��<��. street hts, and a two year streetlight�ng fee. !� ) Se �on 18.164.120 of the Tigard Municipal Co e (TMC) req �res all overt�eacf .�t�,�ty lines djacent to a development to be place �mderground or, t the elect�on ot the develop r, a fee in-lieu of undergrounding c be paid. This requ� ement �s val�r_i even if the utilit �nes are on the opposite side � the street from the site f the fee in-!�eu �s proposed, it s equal to � ?l ;�0 per i� e�l �oo± of street frontage t at c;;��t ��-��, ��_� overhead lines. There are existing overhea utility I�n�s ich run ad�acent to this site along �W _ ___ Prior to , the applicant shall either pl�� -� i'��_�:�;�: utilities underground, or pay the e -iieu descnbed above. in some cases, where street imprcvements or other necessary public ir�provements ar� ��ot c�,�.er„�� practical. the improvements may be deferred In such ca5es, a condition of development approval may be specified which requires the property owner(s) to execute a non-remonstrance agre2ment which �vaives the property owner's right to remonstrate against the formation of a locaf improverr,er�t ,iistr;ct The following street improvements rray be eligible for such an agreement. ( 1 .i SVJ �_ �vl..T�✓��------ -- ---- - �� ' — -- --- Ped strianways/bikeways Sanitary Sewers: �-r� � nearest sanitary sewer line to this property ,� air, � inch line wr�;;�� ,_;, 1.�� ! ' - — a�.. �v/� .--- — ---- Th � .-,�� ;�osed development must rF. �: ,�, ;�� ;r��_! � � ,�:��,� ;��n�tary sewer. It is the cieveloper � ��_��,�:�,;��,�h�!,r�;� r�; _�v.r�-'C__��_��rnlbl "t� P�-�--5�- • - ----- ----- --- r,,z�•. ,r.,..�,� �a,sr,o�u..E� � l-�� P�- �.�c �s ►� �. P�i- �,t�..�— �-+�.sE. � �vVat�r Sup��ly: The �A�.�i�.l �p�.��-( Water District - Phone�(503;_?_�_ ��S�I provides public water sEr�.�ic�: ." the area of this site. The District should be cc�ntacted fcr mformation regarding water supply fo� ��.�� ;�;rop�sed development. ,�r�1r �►.�.v.�� -� �,a� ��-- ��, Pn.�,�T �' A 3" Pl��. �atc� T� T�MA�.r Src�. AS �- . '�,S ,.�°•.t uavF.. �.i ,sP�ov� �..� P�n•a,�sy �tr. CITY DF TIGARD Pre-Appticatlon Conference Notes Page 2 of 5 Engineering Oepartmam Section , • � ��GtE:CtlOfl� ; ,.:.:itin Valley Fire and Rescue District (Contact: Gene Birchill, (503) 526-2469) �rov��i�� re protection services within the City of Tigard The District should be contacted for �nforrn�hon regarding the adequacy of circulation systems. the need for fire hydrants, or other questions relate,i r-,> fire protection. Storm Sewer Improvements: All proposed development within the City shail be designed such that storm water runoff �s c,_�r��-��;F�� to an approved public drainage system The applicant will be required to submit a proposed storn� drainage plan for the site, and may be requ�red to prepare a sub-bas�n drainage analys�s to ensure that the proposed system will accommodate runoff from upstream properties when fully developed A doUrnstream analysis will also likely be necessary to determine if runoff from ti�e proposecl de�.�etopment will cause adverse impacts to !he ex�s!ing stonn system downstream of the �ite �_�►.�.� �v�-�.�sL(t�a� R ___ �..�i�_s-�`�'`^--- DQ-�n1�' P� F-�_J��-�%4•�p_ ��°�— wrt++ �.�r.c t� � ��tta,.! . Other Comments: All proposed sanitary sewer and storrn drainage :,ystems shail be designed suc�. t��at ,;,�; maintenance vehicles will have unobstructed access to critical manholes in tne systems Mair�tenanc.e access roadways may be required if existing or proposed facilities are not othen�vise read�ly accessible. STORM WATER QUALITY , � � ��ty `��as agreed �o enforce �urf��.�� ",_=ir��,, ".,1�i� t ,.�,, �n+. �,SWM) regulations esta� ��,�,�_�_� , • _ Unrtied Sewerage Agency (USA) (Resoluti�n and Order No. 91-47, as amended by R&O 91-�'S� wh�cr� requires the construction of on-site water qual�ty facilities The facilities shali be designed to remove 65 percent of the phosphorus contained in 100 percent ot the storm water runoff generateci fr�m newly created impervious surfaces The resolution contains a provision that would allow an applicant to pay a fee in-lieu of constructing an or:-site fac�lity provided specific criteria are met The City �n,��ll use discretion in determining whether or not the fee in-lieu will be offered. If ihe fee is a�iowed, it �,��II be based upon the amount of new impervious surfaces created; for every 2,64O square feet, cr �artion thereof, the fee shall be $21 U. Preliminary sizing calculations for any proposed w��ter qual�tv ` i�,i!ity shall be subrYiitted with the development appl�cation It is anticipated that this project �v�i, ��;��iire_ � � Construction of an on-site water quality facifity. � � Payment of the fee in-lieu. CITY OF TIGARD Pre-Application Conference No[es Page 3 of 5 Engineering Oepartment Section � � T�Af�'��'�MPACT FEES In 1990, Washinyton County adopted a county-wide Traffic Impact Fee (TIFj ordinance The Traffic Irnpact Fee prograrr� collects fees frorn new development based on the development s pro�ected impact upon the City's transportation system. The applicant shall be required to pay a fee t�asE�d upon the number of trips which are projected to result from the proposed development The calculation of the TIF is baseci on the proposed use of the land, the size of the project, and a general use based fee category. The TIF_ �hall be calculated at the time of building perrr�it__issuance. In limited circumstances, payment of the TIF inay be allowed to be deferred until the issuance of ar occupancy permit. Deferral of the payment until occupancy is permissible only when the TIF > ��rE�aier tnan ��.000.00. P,�-( �—E PERMITS En ineerinq Departrnent Permits. Any work within a public right-of-way in the City of Tigard requires a p�rrnit frorr� t�� Fn�ineering Uepartment. There are two types o` permits issued by Engineering, as toflows: Street Open�ng Permit (SOPi. This permit covers relatively m�nor work in a p�_�b�ic r�ght-of-way or easernent, such as sidewalk and driveway installation or repair, and service conr�ections to ma!n utility lines. This work may involve open trench work within the street The permittee must submit a plan or the proposed work for review and appro�✓al The cost ot this type of permit �s calculated as 4°�0 of the cost of the work and is payable prior ±o issuance of the perm�t in addition, the �ermittee will be required to post a bond or s�milar financial s��!�riiy for the wo�k. � Compiiance Ay�eement (CAPj. This permit covers more extens�ve v��ork such as �1�air� utility I+ne ex!ensions. street impiovements, etc. In subdivisi�ns, this typ� ut perm�t also :�overs ail grading and �rivaie utility work Plans prepared by a registered prof��s�ior�l �n�::��neer mu�t be submitted for revi�4v and approval. The cost of this permit is also calcuiated as 4"�� •ai the cost of the improvernents based on the design engineer's estirnate and is ;:ayab�e prior to issuance of tt}e approved plan The permittee will also be required to post a ��eiformance bond, or other such suitable security, and execute a Develope�;�Er�g�n�er Agreement �vhich will obl�gate the design engineer to perform the primary inspectiori c;f tne pub;ic ;r�prcvement construction �vork. Prior to City acceptance of any permitted work. and prior to release �f work assur�nce b�nd(s). the work �hali be dPemed compiete and satisfartory by the City ir. ,vritin��. Th� pe-in+t�ee is respon�ible for `.he work until such time written City acceptance of the work is postec! NOTE: if an Engineering Permit is required,the applicant must cbtain tha[ permit prior to release of any permits from the Building Diuision. Buil�ingDiv_i_s_ion Pe��7i�ts The following is a brief overview of the type of permits issued by the B,.��Iding Division For a more detailed explanation of these permits. please contact the Development Serv�ces Courter ,�t 503-639-4171 ext 3Ga CITY OF TIGARU Pre-Applicatlon Gonference Notes Page 4 of 5 Enylaeerfng Departmanr Sectlon — � � Site Improvement ,rmit (SIT). This permit is genE ,r issued for all new commercial, industrial and multi-family projects. This permit will also be required for land partitions where lot grading and private utility work is required. This permit covers all on-site preparation, grading and utility work. Home builders will also be required to obtain a SIT permit for grading work in cases where the lot they are working on has slopes in excess of 20% and foundation excavation material is not to be hauled from the site. Building Permit (BUP). This permit covers only the construction of the building and is issued after, or concurrently with, the SIT permit. Master Permit (MST). This permit is issued for all single and multi-family buildings. It covers all work necessary for building construction, including sub-trades (excludes grading, etc.). This permit can not be issued in a subdivision until the public improvements are substantially complete and a mylar copy of the recorded plat has been retumed by the applicant to the City. For a land partition, the applicant must obtain an Engineering Permit, if required, and retum a mylar copy of the recorded plat to the City prior to issuance of this permit. Other Permits. There are other special permits, such as mechanical, electrical and plumbing that may also be required. Contact the Development Services Counter for more information. GRADING PIAN REQUIREMENTS FOR SUBDIVISIONS All subdivision projects shall require a proposed grading plan prepared by the design engineer. The engineer will also be required to indicate which lots have natural slopes between 10% and 20%, as well as lots that have natural slopes in excess of 20%. This information will be necessary in determining if special grading inspections will be required when the lots develop. The design engineer will also be required to shade all structural fill areas on the construction plans. In addition, each homebuilder will be required to submit a specific site and floor plan for each lot. The site plan shall include topographical contours and indicate the elevations of the comers of the lot. The builder shall also indicate the proposed elevations at the four comers of the building. "� � PREPARED BY: � ' � � '—� �� GINEERING DEPAR MENT STAFF Phone: [5031639-4171 Fax: [5031684-T297 h:�patty�masters�preapp.eng (Master section:preapp-r.mst) 18-Nov-97 CITY Of TIGARU Pre-Applicadon Conferenca No[es Page 5 of 5 Eo�la��rlo'lapartoeot S�etl�a ' 06.'03i98 11:�8 $503 88� i29i CITF OF TIG�IRD �018 I � _ j � x � D r ' �� I � i � ; �,� � , , � ` � � L . � � : � � � � � �cD��, � � - � , � �� < I � _ � ._ � �, > - - - � � a ;I � � � c I � ;a � � , MITA CM� ': � S� ' � I � r � � '� 'p � � • r �� C '" � • � � ..� . 9°�� ', �/ � � C,, � � , i + � saR 9�-no��v� ��-ooas � ; �c tn ap N , . ; Note: Map is not to scale � � Hail Park aff��S RECEIVED AUG 1 � 1998 August 12, 1998 COP:"VIU!VITY DEVELOPPr":�NT CiTY OF TIGARD Tigard Planning Department Attn: Mark Roberts 13125 SW Hall Blvd. "1'igard Oregon, 97223 RE: Pre-Application Conference—Tax Lots 1400, 1800, 1S1, 35DA, Brahma Bremananda Ashram, 11515 SW Hall Blvd., Tigard, OR 97223 Dear Mark, Thanks for a pleasant meeting we recently had. I sincerely appreciate your helpful nature and mannerism. We request a pre-application conference to discuss a proposed addition to an existing house and the construction of a new temple within the jurisdictional limits of the City of Tigard as referenced above. The following items listed below address the proposed development: • Applicant: Sam Adettiwar, MS, PE 1225 NW Munay Blvd. Suite 210 Portland, OR 97229 • Owner: Brahma Bremananda Ashram 11515 SW Hall Blvd Tigard, OR 97223 • Engineer/Surveyor: VLMK Consulting Engineers and Lewis & Van Vleet 3933 SW Kelly Ave. Consulting Engineers Portland, OR 97201-4393 15924 Quarry Rd. Lake Oswego, OR 97035 • Two copies of a site plan have been enclosed and other pertinent information. We look forward to receiving your call for appointment soon. Sincerely, am Adettiwar, MS, PE .• , , .. _ _ 'Pr�-Apps �CD Meetings} ..... : �9�s S M T W T F S `:``: � :: ' , > ! _; ' !' 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 ::: ;: : _ _. _. _, '' 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 ::: i; 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 % ':23 24 25 26 27 28 29 Tues�J�� 1��1�� 9$ ' 30 31 8:00 �8:30 �__ - - - - --- - — _ _ �� 9:00 �arn�c��iw��e-;B� 9Q��v,t�1��s ' '� Re: �451�!�il1l Halt B�v�: '' 9:30 � . I , _ _ ..;;: : ;: ; I . .......:.....__....-�---------------..._.W.W I 10:00 10:30 - ...... ........... ..�_.... 11:00 �'ke Mifler. Alpha �r� [tf��rtng ?�� &dt�� ' wlMark Roberts, re. �t�tQll��fIl�ge t � 11:30 - -- - I 12:00 � - - - ---- - -� 12:30 �, � i1:00 ,--- , - ' 1:30 i � 2:00 , 2:30 L- i ; 3:00 I 3:30 I 4:00 4•30 5:00 � , 5.30 �- �:00 11:51AM Thursday,August 13, 1998 — —.__� �J �' y� o a � _.::. ....... Tp�IpLE Fpp1pRINT `� 3S4 -.. '' a -, .. ...,Tlfa,UD6 COURTYARO `� u .. � : V ..:- , � ""f O .` a U .. . .., ...: � � p � : o-f ro z2� �w � � ,.. ..... ..:..... ..... � �O�oWC . _._ _....... . , o � w :,.. ............ A' ..Q.........._.. n 0 .-... Q ' ., 6 C MPACT 6 COMPACT � l _I :._.. � "'�.., 4 �'�. :":.-� . i J.........i...........1...... � I - - �+�-. .... 6`,. PACT 6 COMPACT ' 1 ..._ ; � .:. :.. '.. f N . .._. �.............._... FLOW ........ - -. . ' �"6,$TANDAR fi STANDAAp ........... � ..1 � , ..o...._ . ---- ,... ............. . --- .... - � . a � 0 z � N - ...,.... ....._ .........__. ...., . . - �.. .............. 220 ' � . .. , ' ....... 6 STAMDARD 6 SritWD.ARD �� ""� . �' �... ....................._.... Flow ........__..... ° .-....... °- � , ......-._......._ .. a �`.H $TANDARD ... , 8 STA ....!..........._i...._. � .... .. ..�.._. . � _...._. '' .,. ., �•. : ................ ' -.... \, . •. ., ..... ,. �.. ,. ''�., �'x1;�y�g _ --� ....... _ .......�-.�c;GSe ......: .. , .. �. . �... � _...... ........ , ,. . �� . ..,. .. : - ...... . .. �. 0 0 ....._. o�o o . '>. _y--1 0 _ '' '� ............. ,. . .... . .. __.... ..._.._, 2�5 ._... �• •- ..._ , �5So� � o r�-15`r'�� . . � , ,. CITY pF TIGARD COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT APPLICATION CHECKLIST C1TY OF TIOARD The items on the checklist below are required for the succesful compietion of your application submission requirements. This checklist identifies what is required to be submitted with your application. This sheet MUST be returned and submitted with all other applicable materials at the time you submit your land use application. See your application for further explanation of these items or call the City of Tigard Planning Division at (503) 639-4171. Staff: l�vl Date: 25 9� APPIIG�TION & RELATED DOCUtiIENT(S) SUBMfTTAL REQUIREMENTS INCLUDE ,/MARKED ITEMS A) Application fo�m (1 copy) m� B) Owner's signaturelwritten authorization �� C7 Title transfer instrumendor grant deed �� D) Applicant's statement No. of Copies 2� E) Filing Fee � � + G �5 SITE-SPECIFIC MAP{S)/p�N(5} SUBMITTAI REQUIREMENTS INCLUDE ,/MARKED ITEMS A) Site Informatio� shawin : No. of Copies �" 1. Vicinity map �� 2. Site size & dimensions � 3. Contour lines (2 ft at 0-10% or 5 ft for grades > 10°/0) � 4. Drainage patterns, courses, and ponds � 5. Locations of natural hazard areas including: o (a) Floodplain areas � (b) Slopes in excess of 25% � (c) Unstable ground � (d) Areas with high seasonal water table �'' (e) Areas with severe soil erosion potential o (fl Areas having severely weak foundation soils � 6. Location of resource areas as shown on the Comprehensive �V1ap Inventory including: (a) Wildlife habitats ° (b) Wetlands ° 7. Other site features: ° (a) Rock outcroppings o (b) Trees with 6" + caliper measured 4 feet from ground leve! [�� 8. Location of existing structures and their uses �/� 9. Location and type of on and off-site noise sources 10. Location of existing utilities and easements �/ 1 1. Location of existing dedicated right-of-ways o/ UVp U5�,�pp��GiTION/LIST P�Cc 1 Of 5 • . , B) Site Oevelo ment � �an Indicatin : No, of Copies � 1. The proposed site and surrounding properties �/ 2. Contour line intervals � 3. The locatio�, dimensions and names of all: (a) Existing & platted streets & other public ways and easements on the site and on adjoining properties m� (b) Proposed streets or other public ways & easements on the site (c) Alternative routes of dead end or proposed streets � that require future extension � 4. The location and dimension of: (a) Entrances and exits on the site �� {b) Parking and circulation a�eas � (c) Loading and services area e� (d) Pedestrian and bicycie circulation �� (e) Outdoor common areas � (� Above ground utilities � 5. The location, dimensions & setback distances of all: (a) Existing permanent structures, improvements, utilities, and easements which are located on the site and on adjacent / property within 25 feet of the site �y% (b) Proposed structures, improvements, utilities and easements on the site � 6. Storm drainage facilities and analysis of downstream conditions � 7. Sanitary sewer facilities � 8. The location areas to be landscaped � 9. The location and type of outdoor lighting considering crime prevention techniques � 10. The location of mailboxes � 11. The location of afl structures and their orientation � 12. Existing or proposed sewer reimbursement agreements �g� C� Grading Plan Indicatin�: No. of Copies �� ) The site development plan shall include a grading plan at the same scale as the site analysis drawings and shall co�tain the following information: 1. The location and extent to which grading will take place indicating: (a) General contour lines m� (b) Slope ratios � {c) Soil stabilization proposal(s) �� (d) Approximate time of year for the p�oposed site development � 2. A statement from a registered engineer supported by data factual substantiating: (a) Subsurface exploration and geotechnical engineering report ❑ (b) The validity of sanitary sewer and storm drainage service proposals � ~ (c) That all problems will be mitigated and how they will be mitigated � L�Np USE APPLIGTION/LIST PnGE 2 OF S ., , , D) Architectural Dra ;s I�dicatin�: No. of Copies � - The site development plan proposal shail include: til 1. Floor plans indicating the square footage of all structures '`� proposed for use on-site �� 2. Typical elevation d�awings of each structure E} Landscape Plan Indicatin�: No. of Copies 2-Q The landscape plan shall be drawn at the same scale of the site ' analysis plan or a larger scale if necessary and shall indicate: 1. Description of the irrigation system where applicable �/� 2. Location and height of fences, buffers and screenings �g� 3. Location of terraces, decks, shelters, play areas, and common open spaces ❑ / 4. Location, type, siZe and species of existing and proposed plant materials eY S. Landscape narrative which also addresses: (a) Soil conditions �� (b) Erosion control measures that will be used o� � Si�n Drawin�s: Sign drawings shall be submitted in accordance with Chapter 18.114 � of the Code as part of the Site Development Review or prior to obtaining a Building Permit to construct a sign. G) Traffic Generation Estimate: � H) Prelimina Partition/Lot Li e Ad'ustment Ma Indicatin : No. of Copies 1. The owner of the subje arce! � 2. The owner's authorized a ent � 3. The map scale (20,50,100 or 200 feeta 1) inch north arrow and date ❑ 4. Description of parcel loca ion and boundaries � S. Location, width and name f streets, easements and other public ways within and adjacent to e parcel � 6. Location of all permanent b ildings on and within 25 feet of all property lines � 7. Location and width of all w er courses � 8. Location of any trees within 6' or greater caliper at 4 feet above ground level o 9. All slopes greater than 25% o l0. Location of existing utilities an utility easements o 1 1. For major land partition which creates a public street: (a) The proposed right-of-way location and width o (b) A scaled cross-section of t e proposed street plus any reserve strip o 12. Any applicable deed restrictions � � 13. Evidence that land partition will n t preclude efficient future land division where applicable o UNO USE APPLIGTION��IST PnGE 3 Of ; � '' ' I) Subdivision Preli�r P1at a and Data indicatin : No. of Copies 1. Scale equaling 30,50,1 0 or 200 feet to the inch and limited to one phase per sheet ❑ 2. The proposed name f the subdivision o 3. Vicinity map showin property's relationship to arterial and collector streets ❑ 4. Names, addresses and lephone numbers of the owner, developer, engineer, surveyer and esigner (as applicable) ❑ S. Date of application o 6. 6oundary lines of trac to be subdivided ❑ 7. Names of adjacent s division or names of recorded owners of adjoining parcels of n-subdivided land ❑ 8. Contour lines relate to a City-established benchmark at 2-foot intervals fo� 0-10% grades gre r than 10°Jo ❑ 9. The purpose, location, pe and size of all the following (within and. adjacent to the p�opos d subdivision): (a) Public and priv te right-of-ways and easements ❑ (b) Public and pri te sanitary and storm sewer lines o (c) Domestic water m 'ns including fire hydrants ❑ (d) Major power telep ne transmission lines (50,000 volts or greater) ❑ (e) Watercourses % o (� Deed reservations f�r parks, open spaces, pathways and other land encumbrances ❑ 10. .�pp�oximate plan and prof' es of proposed sanitary and storm sewers � with grades and pipe size indicated on the plans ❑ 1 1 . Plan of the proposed wat distribution system, showing pipe sizes and the location of valves and e hydrants o 12. Approximate centerline prof' es showing the finished grade of all streets including street extensions f r a reasonable distance beyond the limits of the proposed subdivision ❑ 13. Scaled cross sections of propos street right-of-way{s) ❑ 14. The location of all areas subjed o inundation or storm water overflow a 15. Location, width & direction of ow of all water courses & drainage-ways ❑ 16. The proposed lot configuration , approximate lot dimensions and lot numbers. Where lots are to used for purposes other than residential, it shall be indicated u n such lots. ❑ 17. The location of all trees with a diameter 6 inches or greater measured at 4 feet above ground level, and th� location of proposed tree plantings ❑ 18. The existing uses of the property, including the location of all structures and the present uses of the structu'res, and a statement of which structures are to remain after platting ❑ 19. Supplemental information including; (a) Proposed deed restrictions (if a' y) ❑ (b) Proof of property ownership o (c) A proposed plan fo� provision of ubdivision improvements a 20. Existing natural features including rock outc ppings, wetlands & marsh areas ❑ 21 . If any of the foregoing information cann practicably be shown on the preliminary plat, it shall be incorporated i to a narrative and submitted with the application ❑ 1,�N0 USE APPLIG710N/LIST PAGE�OF S .. ,' , � J) Solar Access Caiculat s: o K) Other Info�matio� No. of Copies ❑ h:Vogi��pattylmastersU{icl ist.mst N�v 23,1995 LANO USE APPLIC,�TION J LI57 PnGE i OF 5 � Ot3/02/98 11:37 $503 68-� 7.',9i CITF OF TIG:�RD I�oo3 � �. _ - = =- - -�N411C��O�DECISlOMr�:.-.;;��= _ _ - ��r . ___ _ . -- -- --- -- __ :�-- . - . - . - -- - - - ---T._ - -_ ::;;�:_;Y :�- _.-�� - -�_,:�.:. � .:�:� -_SITEDEitEt�PMENT=REVlE11�iSDR'1:�7-0�� .� �� :��::=� • _ �`�� .�"'-- - - :a-, f-�-:�� _ +�-�,r:_. :,..�f��n'� �1, .��:i_='�=� _ 'Ki-`-��'- - �j�� ' KV��OV�� c ' `� ' ;�Cl11 OFT[Os� ;`",:� � •:..a,.... '� i--t`^ 5`y'�-�"•.�',��[�. ��r:•J•� "� ^,r. _ �.':G:G•rr—� :r.A�+.Y�.:'�a� :�t�S�_f�� ^?�,Z••�. _' _ ' � ~� _ - •�'�. � � - �1��'��i�� '�.r� _�=��= ,a,, .,, �-� _. Y;�, -,- � �- '�PO1g' ro . s _ _ _ _ . ' _ " .. _ . _6w �- �N"�.'WT �1�-�a ..l' SECTION I, APPL1CATiON SUMMARY CASES: FILE NAME: HAIL PARK OFFICE CENTER Sits Developme�rt Review SDR 97-0014 Variance VAR 97-0018 PROPOSAL: The appticant has requested Site Development Review approval to develop a finro story, 32,735 square foot office buifding and related site improvements. APPLlCANT: Mr. Mike Nedelisky OWNER: Brahma Premanada 25 82nd Drive, Suite 102 115T5 SW Hatl Bouievard Gladstone, OR 97207 Tigard, OR 97223 OVYNER: Mr. Mke Nedelisscy 25 82nd Drive, Surte 102 COMPREHENSIVE ��MP� � Gladstone, OF3 97207 PLAN DESIGNATlON: Commercia! Pr�ofessional; C-P. ZONING DESIGNATION: ProfessionaUAdministrative �ffice, Commereial District; C-P. The purpose ot the C-P Zoning District is to provide for groups of businesse5 and offices in centers. Permitted uses include: Professional and Administrative services, Public agency administrative services, Cultural exhibits and library senrices, Public support facilities, Lodges, fratemal and civic assembiy, Postal services, Animal sales and services, 8usiness equipment sales and services, Communication services. Children's day care; Medicaf and denta.l services, Research services, and Financial, insurance, and real estaie services, among others. LaCAT]ON: 11481 SW Hall Boulevard; WCTM 1S135DA, Tax Lots 01400. 01800, �3500 and 0350i. The suhject property is located west of SW Hall Boulevard, south of the 217 Freeway, north and west of the existing Kindercare Day Care Ce�er_ APPLICABLE RE1IlEW CFiITER1A: Communiiy Development Code Chapters 18.32, 18.64, 18.100, 18.102, 18.106..1 S.l 08, '18.114, 18.116, 18.120, 18.150 and 18.164. SECTION !1. DECISION Notice is-hereby given that the Cjiy-of Tigard.Community. Developmec►t.Directo�s designee - ._ . .y. - �, »:-==-: ' -=-"--:..;: `=`•=�.-.;�-.��l�:;`:,:.�wY-='=�;:�.,,: -_ _ .'�-�,�` has;l�.PR01fE�:tfi�:atioVe �eques�su6ject to certain:cocKi�ions:of�app�ovai:;��:�-=. - Jy ^. . . . : •� - �:_ _ " . . +�0.-•. _ __�;— _ �_ , _ — _.v,.w,..�• _ _ .�;�r _ _ ��: .-:u:°�..^.;� •A�.��r'��}s- 9'4".'.'�' . ' .�." _t:-._�•.J��i ' � :�Y F_" :�"'" •G�7-.'.�Y'.��c^....'*F 3: So-..'-� 1'i-,.. � :Thefindmgs:and-conciusions-.on�rttich tfie dec�sron-�based_arie_noted�in�Section�IV.' - - __�.-- �- - _-,_ _ _ ��. NOTICE OF DEC�.SION -- SOR 91-0C14NAR 9'7-0016-HALL PARK OPFIGE CEtdTFA PAGE 1 OF 1a .�-.. ._ ;� � � `I _ . ; _ _ ,. , � � �, � ., — i , � i �� t y � i �, I � , q , , �� , � I I , , � - �. � y � � '� ; � j ,', � � ' r � � , 1� � „/ , � � , I ,�� , , , , ' j ' I � ,'`. � ' .'.' I�: � �, , � ' � � � ' , , � �1f 1 � � ,�'�, i —�:i...��'�'-�-li�', -�i '1j"_:f � �j3.r�� :"--"•' '// r� , r ' ,� � 1 , ', , • ' ! � � / . ._� � F, � � j 1 � �'...�'°-"'-" - i ^• • i � �ir �h i � � � � .� r;� ' -1 i � 1 � � . � ; ; � �r 1 ;"� , , : � � ,-�; ,�� , .,� � _ _ �¢,, , � � ; . J , _ � ; - .-• ; ,� , : .;' , � � { < < ., . ;; � . , � , � � � ,, � � o � i ,� � g _d ' � ��, �� % , G � 1 � � l i� , �� I ,� co a�� p� �' � � (� �� ; ( � ;' a,°D, �r � 0 '{ 1' f � � I ' � � 1 '� � � , ' . � I . �,% � , . , ;' , —, � r i.�. ; � '' %`� �' `� , 1 �� ,/ ;' ,% tc' r, � -' , � � •;� _, � � � � , ' . 'j , � :' , ; ;. ;_ , , � � �' :" ;,:: � � �� , ' �' �� , ,� , �, �� i�', �� , � � � � 1 %:� i/ i. � x�� L _ � , I'��I� `,�% , �/, . � � � �S• 1 . r, ��t I�� ' / /i �!�Ji ' �l � � � ,r i � ��i � I � �^/� � \� �� /�i ��' j'/,� ; W i � ; � / �j�l; �I / �/� M . I � I i q � `� , �� I� �i ��/�� , .. . ; ,C ' Q 1 .�, ' ,�i, ��',',r' /�j 1�.--' _• • � � ` � N ` �, ,\,' .• .�.,r v : �,,,'` � / A ;� ''I � ' •'n ' ' . � � � � y .��Ip �� ,,� �,, , � ' � O � !;� '�• ' • 1 i � � � � i/ :�� G� ` ' �r;. ''`% C i� E7 � , f � .� . -,, ,,;;'r ,� a ,',- , �'�'� �l !� � �;f:� � a --� ,;' , �� i r� ,� • ' _��" ,'i � + v I i I�i�i � �A i', � `` /, �� .�y ,` � 'i (/�\� I� I V l�i��/ � � ,� f �: � O � 1 I /I�I � , ;� / � •I f,', i i� � � I�/� �% ��AA / � � i , ' 1 ;I /;/�/ /�, ,�i f �� N�,'�/ � � //� •��, � � ��, /�' � Q ! .�1 V/ I i i�/ , �� ' /�' y � V � � �/ 1 �,r .. 1 � i�i�/ �`/ �I, ,� ', ��I � D I I �I �� ,' � �.; ,- 0 0 70 2 ( . ` I �,.`''' ' �.`" ;, ;;;,, O J �� . , ,% ��: � � A � 1 '� � �r��i� �� ,...._.,�� ' ' ,, �i O � � �i � ��/�� .- � f��' 1 T � . ie��Iii� j �I�/ / i � � f � . r � i LVD ``. m , � � . , ,.r--- , -� ,,,,-f.,;� ; � 0 r CITY OF TIGARD PLANNING DIVlS14N -� ..�� _ �.___�_��__ __ c�-P �� a�r City of Tigard Washington County, Oregon Voluntary Compliance Agreement July 13, 2005 To: Representative of Brahmapremananda 11515 SW Hall Blvd. Tigard, OR 97223 Re: Land Use Violation, damage to protected trees. As the responsible parties for property described as 1 S135DA, Tax Lot 01400 (11515 SW Hall Blvd.), I agree to the following condition: Resolve the continuing land use violation by the following actions: a. Provide arborist report regarding the health and stability of all trees greater than 12-inches. b. Pay civil penalty of $500.00 for each tree greater than 12-inches in diameter that has been damaged by construction activities. c. Pay civil penalty representing the estimated value of damaged trees over 12-inches in diameter, as determined using the most current International Society of Arboriculture's Guide for Plant Appraisal. d. Provide mitigation plan and timeline for 100 percent of the inches damaged by construction activities. We understand that the City will withhold further action until August 13, 2005. Upon compliance of the above condition, this case will be closed. We further understand if these conditions are not complied with fully in the timeframe provided, we will be cited with a court Summons and Complaint. Signed: �' ��f�� Date: l'��-v`.� � , Signed: � � >> � ,v��G% - .�-- Date: ��:. _�-��- �S- Note: Please sign af►d return copy of this agreement within five days from the date of receipt of this document, otherwise this document is terminated and a Summons and Complaint will be issued. ' Jul 19 OS 11 : 53p Jason Mes�er 503. 281 . 3206 p. 2 . < � Ari��rist lettei'rC�ort Submitted to: Brahma Premar�da Ashram 11515 5W Hall Blvd Tigard, OR 47223 Submitted by: Jason Messer ISA Certifiod Arborist#PN-5582A Date of ir_spection: July 14`�2005 Purpose of report:Provide Tree inventory data regarding the health and stability of al!trees greater than 12 inches at I 15 I S S��`Hall Blvd. Tigard Uregan 97223, O'uservation: This site has scen lots of coristraction activity in the last few years. The Brahma Premanda Ashram was built in 2002 and 2UO3 with continued site development going on at the time of this report.There is no tree preservation plan boing implemented on the site. Large anounds of dirt and Severly compacted soil is Found throu�;hout the site and w7thin the Root Protection Zone(RP�)of the inventoried trees. 4 Quercus garryana trees(3 on the west fence line and 1 in a tree bed off the northwest corner cf the ashram) total the deciduous trees on the site. A group of 10 Pseudotsuga menziesii and 1 Pinus ponderosa on the norfh sic3e of the Ashram total the coniferous trees on the site. A total of 10 co�iifer sturnps w�ere ioca.ted,6 ofwhich were recentty removed. Using photo interpretation techniques it w�s determined that these trees were dead prior to reinoval and the other 4 stumps were lrees removed at an earlier date. Tree Inventory Data Tree�# Tree specias DBH`(IN� Heakh" Category"'" 1 Querc:�s flarryana 3Q.25 fair 2 81+ght,Sun bum, Decay 2 Pseudatsuga merziesii 'i7 g000 3 3 P�nus ponderosa 26 good 3 4 Pseudotsuga menziesii 33 poor 3 Top is dying, Deadwood 5 Pseudotsuga menziesli 13 good 3 6 Pseudatsuga menziesii 18.5 gooC 3 T Pseudotsuga menziesii 21.25 good 3 8 Pseudotsuga menziesii 14.75 9ood 3 9 Pseudotsuga menziesii 22.25 fair 3 Blight, Compaction 10 Pseudobuga menziesii 16,5 fair 2 Top b;oke out 11 Pseudobuga menziesii 16.25 poor 2 �'op is dying, Deadwood 12 Pseudotsuga menziesii 24 good 3 13 Quercus garryana 28 good 3 14 Quercus garryana 20.5 good 1 6lignt, RPZ coripaction 15 Querc�s garryana 29.75 gocd 1 RPZ coripaction • RQmO�I�tl�Q�C� Stump(IN)� (�.$t690��w• 1S Pseudot5uga menziesii 28.5 3 17 PSeudotsuga menxiesii 20 3 1 S Pseudotsuga menziesii 24 2 19 Pseudotsuga menzicsii 21 2 20 Pseudotsuga menziesii 26 2 21 Pseudotsuga menziesii 3? � * DB�-I: Diamoter Brcast Height�4.5 feetl, IN=inches ** Tree health: Goc�d: Soil compact�on is minii�tat tree shrnr�s strong growth nabit, Fair: Soil�ompaction ar.d blight in the RPZ is evident,tree is not in deciine Poor:Tree is showinu signs of decline *** Categories 1. trees within 50 feet of the Ashram footprir.t z, trees within 10(}feet of Ashram footprint 3. trees morc than 100 Yeet frorn the Ashram footprint s,nalysis: Using photo inteipretacion of aerial photographs, it is determined that the remainin�conifer trees were recently a part�f a lazger and more diver;�e.forest type. Lo�s of canopy azaund the remaining group of conifers has been xcurring rapidly since 2000. In 200 and 2001 the first thinning occvrred. In 2002 continued thu�ning oecurred and initial conifer dieback is evident in. In 2d03, 2 or 3 conifer trees died. In 2004 2 or 3 conifcr trees died. Now in 2005 the remaining t I coaifer trees are ca-dominant and dcclining dominant trecs with a sparse understory. Recommen�atians: Cro�uca clean trees, Soil sample,Percolation test,Tree preservatian plan, Post construction remediation Sincerely, � �"' J� n vlesser I5A #PN-5582� '�lortheast Arboriculture PO box 12584 PDX,OR 972I2 .. \� •. �. .' � , .Yr ,. . w. ��. � �' � _ .�1�� .-, ; ��. w • , ' , � ,I r .. ' � ��,t �� , . . ' � i . . � . �. .s, �1� �j� �,. . ... . �, �� ' � ��''t I� '""� '�� ,`;,,� y,`�•� �*, .+t� . �� ' '� `'��.., y , � ,, � . , ��t� . . .. _�.,r�.�llrrr `� � �`F.,�� ,. � . � t' . � rn��••Aa�* �'�,+' �1y� ' X V r, ( . , �: .r "� .f , �. „, , $ p '� � � •R, t' '�!. .• y� � �ry :�. .�� .�� „��? ,^��i�� ' � ='�4�!�"'��,r . 7! � . . . , � ,�, , ' �: ' ••.. �.r,,..• , < ` '`' `� �: =� s,� ' ` 4 �: ,� � .�': .� + :• ' �� M ,. .4. 'A, ., ,�.�`, . h �, �r '� �� `'} '� ,5►,� .��,• , . �, ,, . � ,�a � .' �,� r�+!r"�,. >y ,' ', . ,�'" ' . : • �• } x ' . ., �i�,j � . 6�t'�t'1t; . ' •' �} i.•r► ,, ,R. '�;'? '�� 'x' `!�' • ,� .,%r^-fy"1�:,...+ - — ' �Le� . � �^' 't�� ` y��, . ..'.1q� �+" N*c' � y'��' s �,.�. . n " • , y.,�•'� ..�p�,w. "� ,' a,. . .... ..«r�,.nr . 4. ��y�� ,a .�,.�.,�� ,, ..__...___ t;: ti► `Y , • 4 > �.� � �. •� ..• ,, �- F . „ r ,� � * � ��.��'�� .. . � r . . / ��; � �," �' C: ` � � ei .� �* ,� ,,:,� .•; � �� ' " � ' � , :.�� L � � r ♦ �:q��.". , 4 ` ;��.. �. � �r �° �� {�,� t° � � ,� `°I�"�' � '�'.r� 1, �� _a ` , ' +i�� '�IS. .{ � ,/"i -�1� .. , ,� �/' ~.� •+' '� a r � ►� -N � �'��"�"�;� , '�. •��S,c ':�+..� 1 + R �"y . �� .7'w �:1+ � � ,��.• • f.��w ��i i �y A ]� � � 4 . r • r �_]�. ��+' a. �� .t`+�5 � �M 1 y ' '" +�'" �.""'f► ."�' . �� ,� �# � '� . .. .. . ,a � � �.�,�. � � - w � �p.r "t� N �.Q�;�.,.. ..,a.*� . � i4�� '�.a...1,�t��"��.N �.,, , , �r . . �. ,q� �� • �' �..,.. t 1� , •RAS,', '� ��s.L�� "-�y ,�• , �C4... y�,'�•�.. r'K !;. ' 4�s +'��z" ��"�C54, � ,� ,Pk' w � r � h *� � �" .�� e+ry sr+ �+. .� .� 4��tl" '&��, �,,fi�+�y ' �.,4. �, ,�: ! �'+.�{ . .: �`� >,:��,.+ � '�f� � r. , , rti }��'�+� ��;.i5 . �{`X #;+`� "y� � . A� �e �p •, . aA• ��' y�,j� i'� l'� ♦�• �f � ./' , '. / . �1".L.� #.�f�+�i ''�, .�. _ • � *w. � '�n«,t� �° .1 �+ ` . . e,�T�.n�. ,. ��,,�wa��.,�;� *�.��y �" �� . }h+�,' �•-Y, ar _ .1(i t J,.,Sr^p� • �1 � � � , • �.„ -,��.,a, } Y �� i• '�� , �';� � • M„_, � � . . „ p , ,� • ,. - � . •. . � 1 ♦� �� ;, �;�, . �-�� , . . . . . ' ,�.�,�Ms`"' •' K t ' d ,� • . t . �.. . �"�S 1; 3 «<, n � �.,� �:.•t �� ., '� . • , , �W , � � ,�� ,, , "«5 - �' .;�i S� �� •'�„�,,�r�� .t � `+.s ��t�;,af��-"e.. �1;. at Ll. ��, . '� '} ,\�; 4��v M� `� r � . i _ • } �� ,l�!+y��r'� ; ..��' .,.� r•��M ��r� �� b d . �J{� � � � •�Gf.� t'y�if j!�� .}y`' . Y , �� . .a '� �� r r,�pll . �;�, 1 y � �'�'� `��• � ' •_+ �!''�,.,.'t , � ' .•�♦ �' ,,— : . ` . • . y. �'. • ^. � • • �' .� " ' • +�' . • � � • yn,� • w�'{'1 i:.� ;,� �� .. . I ��I.. I , � . ` : ' '.4' # ! +�f � {! y , "r� , . � w �, +' , � "._J ' .� , � Jul 19 OS 11 :53p Jasc Mes3er 503.28' 3206 p. 2 ,Q S' a � �'G a� Arborist letter rcFort �'' Submitted to: Bral�maPremandaAshcam .. •';_'.`��, 1151 S S W Hal l Blvd Tigard,OR 97223 Submitted by: Jason Messer ISA Certified Arborist#PN-5582A Date of ir_spection: Jul� 14`f'2005 Purpose of report:Provide Tree invenLory data regarding the health and stability of ail trezs grcater than 22 inches at 11515 SW Hall Blvd. Tigazd Uregon 97223, Observation: This site has seen lots of cocrstraction activity in the last few years. The Brahma Premanda Ashram was built in 2402 and 2003 with coatinued site development going on at the time of this report.There is no tree preservation pian being implemented an the site. Large arounds of dirt and Severly compacted soil is found ttuou�hout the site and withitt the Root Protection Zone(RP�)of the inventoried trees.4 Quercus garryana trees(3 on the west fence line and 1 in a tree bed off the northwest corner of the Ashram) tota!the deciduous tzees on the site. A group of 10 Pseudotsuga menziesii and 1 Pinus ponderosa on thc north side of the Ashram total the coniferous hees on the site. A tatal of 10 co�iifer stumps wcre located,6 ofwhich were reeentfy removed. Usin�photo interpretation techniques it was determined that these trees were dead prior to recnoval and the other 4 stumps were lrees removed at an earlier date.� Tree Inventory Data Tree�R Tree apa�ciss DBH*(IN� Health"' Category'•" 1 Querc:rs 9arryana 3Q.25 fair z Blight,Sun bum, Decay 2 Pxudobuga menziesii 17 good 3 3 Pinus ponderosa 26 good 3 4 Pseudotsuga menziesii 33 poor 3 Top is dying, Deadwood 5 Pseudotsuga menzfesii 13 good 3 6 Pseudotsuga menziesii 18.5 gaod 3 T Pseudotsuga menziesii 21.25 good 3 8 Pseudotsuga menziesii 14.75 good 3 9 Pseudotsuga menziesii 22.25 fsir 3 Blight, Compaction 10 Pseudatsuqa menziesii 16,5 fair 2 Top broke out 11 Pseudotsuga menziesii 16.25 poor 2 Sop is dying, Deadwood 12 Pseudotsuga menziesii 24 good 3 13 Quercus garryana 28 good 3 14 (luercus garryana 20.5 good 1 Blight, RPZ compaction 15 Cluercus garryana 29.75 good 1 RPZ compaction ' RamovQd troa speciQS Stump(INj"' Category'"" 1b Pseudotsuga menziesii 28.5 3 17 Pseudotsuga menziesii 20 3 18 Pseudotsuga menziesii 24 2 19 Pseudotsuga menzi�sii 21 2 20 Pseudatsuga menziesii 2S 2 21 Pseudotsuga me�ziesii 37 ? * DBH: Diameser Srcast Height�4.5 feet), IN=inches ** Trx health: Good: Soil compaction is miniinat tree shrnvs srrong growth habit, Fair: Soil campaction and biight in the RPZ is evidern,tree is not in decline Poor:Tree is showing signs of deciine *** Categories 1. trees within 50 feet of the Ashram footprint 2. trees within I00 feet of Ashre�m footprint 3. trees more than 100 teet frorn the Ashram footprint Analysis: Using photo inteipretation�f aerial photographs, it is determined that the remaining conifer trees wer$ recently a part of a larger and more diverse forest type. Loas of eanopy azound the remaining group of conifers has been occurring rapidly since 204�. In 200 and 2001 the 5rst thinning occvrred. In 2002 continued thinning occurred and initial conifer dieback is evident in. In 2003, 2 or 3 conifer trees died. In 2004 2 or 3 conifcr trees died. Now in 2005 the remaining 1 I conifer trees are ca-dominant nnd declining dominant trees with a spaise understocy. Reeomtnendarious: Cro��clean trees,Soil sample,Percolation test,Tree pre�ervation plan, Post constructian rernediation Sincecely, rr J n Messer ISA #PN-5582a Northeast Arboriculture PQ box 12584 PDX,OR 972I2 FROM : Sigmd Consultants Group, c PHONE N0. : 503 629 5668 Jul. 19 2005 09:42AM P2 Jul I9 05 10: 23a• Jeson Messer 503. �E) 32UG p. � Ar'norist 1c.Iter re�rt Submitted i.o: Bz�a�a�rE.manda Ashram 1 I515 SW;Hall B:vd Tigard,OR 9?2�3 5ubmitted �>y: Jason Messer iSA Ccrti6�sd Arborisc#PN-S582A i Date ofias��ciio�:3uly I4�'2005 Pur��osc of repon:Provide Tree�ven.aory dara r+�garding che <�ti�ar,d stability of all trees j�neater than 12 inc�es�,t 1 k 5 l S SW Hall Blvd.Tigazd O�: :�n 97223, Observatib�►: 1'his si+.e h$s seex�lots of const�uction actiVity in the la� f�w years.The Brehma P manda Ashra�n was buih in 2002 and 20n3 with contir:u� •.ite deveIopa�ent going on at the timc di this rtport.There is no trc�e pre�ervation plan n;irn�lemented on ihe site. I Large mounds of dirt and Compacicd soil are found thra� i tout the site snd withi,c�ihe�.00t Pmtection ZoQe(RPZ)of the inventoried tre�.�4 Q�. ,u.v garryan�a trees (3 en Il�e wi;st fer�ce line and 1 in a tree bed of�"ihe n�rthwest corner �he Asbram)total the deci�uoi�s�rees on the site. A group of 10 l'seudotsuga menziesi E�d 1 P�uus ponderosa�n the north sida of thc Ash�arn wtal the coaiferous�ee.s� :he site.A total o:f 8 conifer tm�s were located,6 of w�ich were recendy removed, t g ghoto irrtespretax�n tecl�niques it was deterfnined thax tk�ese trees were dea+' •ior to removal and the othq;r two sttui�ps wtre dead tnees rexaa4ved before t�e reeeni ; �:r�amovals. • Tree Inv�t��ry Data � Tree No �pecies BBH'' Health"• Category"" 1 ue�us garryarta 3�.25 gppd � 'seudotsuga 2 tert�esa 17 good 3 3 'Inus ponderos-d 26 good 3 i seudotSUgB 4 rpenziesii 33 paor 3 �aa.suga 5 �en�es� 73 gC�od 3 udptsuga 6 t�iettzfesii 18.5 goad 3 F�seu�v�uga 7' r�tenziesii 21.25 good 3 �}seudotsuga 8 r�►enzies� 14.75 gaod 3 pser�uga 9 enzieeii 22.25 fair 3 udobsuga - 10 etiZiesii 16.5 fair 2 tsuga 11 enzie.sii 18.25 poor 2 I i ! I � I 1 ; I � FROM : Sigma Consultants Group, c PHONE N0. : 503 629 5668 Jul. 19 2005 09:43AM P3 3u1 19 05 10: 23a Jaaon Mes3er Sp3• �01 �06 p-3 � Pseudotsuga 12 menzigSii 24 fair 2 '!3 �uerc�s garryan� 28 good ? 14 Quercus�arryana 2G.5 fair 1 15 Quercus ganyana 29.75 fair 7 Remcved � stump DIA eudats�ga 17 enziesA 25 f'emoved � �� 18 er�iesii 19.� removed � dotsuga 19 enz�esii 23.5 r�R�vved 1 � 20 enzlesii � remove� 1 dotsuga 21 er�esii 34.5 remo+►ed 2 dotsuga 22 errsipsii 22.5 removed 3 * DBH:Di �3reest�ieight in incl�es '�"Tree h . - Soil compaction is minizna�tree shows strong growl.t►I, �it Fai 9oil�ompa�,�tion within Root grote.ction zont is errider�t, :� is still gzbwing Poo .Tree is showing si r�as of dec,�ine *a* C� •� ], within SOfeet of the Ashrarrx foo:print 2. tr wi#han 7S feet of Ashram foatprirn 3. more than 75 faet from the As�n foatprir�t Analysis: in��hnto interpretetion of aerial photo�aphs it is detezti :aci that t�e remaining ' er tz�ees yvere recently$pPUt c=f a Larger and more dive , foxest type.Loss of canopy imd the re�naining grwP nf aomife��s has baen occurrin£. �pidly si�ce 2000. In 2Udi t�e first thinning of the vnderstary«;cza�d. Tn 2402 contir �i understory thituung urred and initial canifer dieback is evide�t ln 2003,?o� �nifer trees d.ied. In 2(�4 ad tiar�a!2 or 3 coaifer trees died Now in 2405 the remair. : conifer trees a�rC sparsE co-d mineat azad dsc�ining dominam trees with no understor� �xetario�►around The r�aintng four deciduous trees aze the Qaercus g�.tyana trees g; ;�ir�g outside of the �R��,�. � RecoFn,m io�: Sozl sa.mPlin�,Pcrcolation tests,trec p�cserv�tio r �lan>crowr..cicau trees. � � incerely, _�° Jason M Northeast 'cuhure YSA.#PI`- 582A PO box 1 84 PDX,OR 972I2 • ' _ _ — _ _----- -- - Joanne Bengtson -(no subject) Page 1 From: <DOCSBPDX@aol.com> To: <craigd@ci.tigard.or.us> Date: 7/19/2005 10:43:08 AM / Subject: (no subject) C � Good Morning H'ble Mayor, �� Thanks for your comments and help as ever. �� Craig I would like to meet you or someone at the City Office to resolve this � issue of the Trees. We have done an arborist report which also reflects our facts that the trees �/�O _ were not killed by the construction. �� We have been asked to sign a Violation report by this week which asks us to pay a hefty fine for the trees. As you are aware that we are struggling to get things resolved and completed as we get our financial pledges from donors. Thus any extra burden of cash flow would put us back in our plans. I would be most grateful if you could please help me solve this issue and help me approach the City to forego this fines and we are wiliing to plant any number of extra trees required. Thank you Please call me at 503 475 9460 or email me . Thanks As ever Shirish Patel Dr. Shirish B. Patel c/o B.P.S. Temple, 3700 NE 82°d Ave PORTLAND OR 97220 Tel.: 503 655 7900 543 475 9460 Email: docsbpdx�a:'aol.com Fax: 503 655 1861 To H'ble Mayor Craig E. Dirksen City of Tigard 13125 SW Hall Blvd., TIGARD OR 97223 Tel.: 503 684 2772 Dear H'ble Mayor Dirksen, Re.: Land use Violation at BPS Temple This is in continuation with my Email and other correspondence. I am writing this on behalf of the BPS Ashram Temple. As mentioned we are slowly approaching the total completion of our project and a great landmark for the City of Tigard. We have been able to get in our pledges for the final part. But we would be most grateful if your Office and The council would be able to waive the Penalty fees levied for trees which had to be cut. There was no other choice for us, and we are willing to plant more trees and make the Landscape around the Temple a project where the public can come in and relaz and enjoy the peace and calm of the site. I would be most grateful if you could have the Building Department look into this affair and review the arborist's report. If there are any other details we have to complete we will comply and a waiver for the penalty fees would help us utilize our resources in completing our Landscape. Thank you. I remain, Yours tr ly Dr. S irish B. Patel cc. Tigard City Council . , . FROM : Sigma Consultants Group, PHONE N0. : 503 629 5668 Jul. 04 2005 09:01AM P2 �I:�:��tl,'2r.�G1�� 1 t:;'ri ��ri:,i,;':I:;i,:,] TIi�F+F:L Falfl 1�111(.� l:�L► I I';='�(;� �?1/i1l City of Tigard Washington Coun�y, aregon Voluntary Compliance Agreernent July 1, 2005 To: Representativ�af Brahmapremananda 11515 SW H�II 81�d. Tigard, OR 97223 Re: Land Use�olation, damage ta protected tr�s. As the responsible p2�rties for prdperty describ�d as 1S935DA, Tax Lo# OiaQ4 (11515 SW Hall BEvd.), I agree to the following condition; Resolv�the continui�lg land use violation by the foflowing actians: a. Provide arborist report regarding the health and stability of a1i trees greater than 12-inches. b. P�y civil penalty of$500.OQ for each tree greater than 'f2-inches in diameter that has been damaged by constructiQn activitie�Y. c. Pay civil pen�lty representing the estim�ted value of dam��ged trees over 12-inches in diameter, 2�s dctermined using the most currE�nt Intematianai Socie�y of Arbo�icutture's Guide for Plant Appraisal. d. F'ravide mitigation pfan and timeiine for 10Q percent of the inches damaged by canstruction activities. We unders#artd tha#the City will wi#hhold furttier action until August 1, 20��. Upon compliance af the above conditidn, this case will be ctosed. We�urther understand if these conditians are not complied rn�ith fully in thE timeframe provided, we wiEl be cited with a court Summons and Complaint. Signed: Date: Signed: �" _�� Date: O � � �� d` P�' �t,,�`s" 7 S� & �$�,� 1 °6 _ __ _ -QDOT � w ' . \ File 60�T- � �.�►.,,� r,�•. �� .�+� ��D� . c v�' �°�°l�-oro�� , �W �I��t��J ��o«- DONATION DEED BRAHMAPREMANANDA ASHRAMA, an Oregon non-profit corporation,which took titie as Brahma Premananda Ashram, Grantor, for no monetary consideratian do2s convey unt�the STATE OF OREGON, by and through its DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION, Grantee, fee title to the property described on Exhibit"A"attached hereto and by this reference made a part hereof. Grantor covenants to and with Grantee, its successors and assigns, that grantor is the owner of said property which is free from encumbrances, except for easements, conditions, and restrictions of record, and will waRant the same from all lawful claims whatsoever, excep.t as stated herein. � Grantor agrees that the consideration recited herein is just compensation for the property or property rights conveyed, including any and all damages to Grantor's remaining property, if any,which may result from the acquisition or use of said property or property rights. However, the consideration does not include damages resulting from any use or activity by Grantee beyond or outside of those uses expressed herein, if any, or damages arising from any negligence. In construing this document, where the context so requires, the singular includes the plural and all grammatical changes shall be made so that this document shall apply equally to corporations and to individuals. THIS INSTRUMENT W1LL NOT ALLOW U5E OF THE PROPERTY DESCRIBED IN THIS INSTRUMENT IN VIOLATION OF APPLICABLE LAND USE LAWS AND REGULATIONS. BEFORE SIGNING OR ACCEPTING THIS INSTRUMENT, THE PERSON ACQUIRING FEE TITLE TO THE PROPERTY SHOULD CHECK WITH THE APPROPRIATE CITY OR COUNTY PLANNING DEPARTMENT TO VERIFY APPROVED USES AND TO DETERMINE ANY LtMITS ON LAWSUITS AGAINST FARMING OR FOREST PRACTICES AS DEFINED IN ORS 30.930. RETURN TO AND TAX STATEMENT TO Account No.: 1S1 35DA 01400 2050600 OREGON DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION RIGHT OF WAY SECTION Property Address: 355 CAPITOL STREET NE, ROOM 420 SALEM OR 97301-3871 7/18/02 Page 1 of 2- DD gmh ODOT - " File 6007-27g It is understood and agreed that the delivery of this document is hereby tendered and that terms and obligations hereof shall not become binding upon the State of Oregon Department of Transportation, unless and until accepted and approved by the recording of this document Dated this �( day of , 2p�?t BRAHMAPREMANANDA A HRAMA, an Oregon non- profit corporation, whi took title as Brahma Premananda A By President By Sec ry STATE OF OREGON, County of LJ 645/.�,'n�5,�°a � Dated �C��atic 5_f �� , 20 00 . Personally appeared Swr+r►-t r ��s�� ry��} /�q�1 d p� and V_I��'b��NO ��5�qS �o.�L ez� , who, being swom, stated that they are the President and Secretary of Brahmapremananda Ashrama, an Oregon non-profit corporation, and that this instrument was voluntarily signed on behalf of the corpora6on by authority of its Board of Directors. Before me: � • �� Ff;CIAI SEAL � � � . �„Q.�� _ ��¢��,,J Y f� ,' R. FEI�D�-PEYERSOFJ Notary Public for Oregon � �� NOTARY FUBLIC-OREGON • �� COMMIS510N N0.322557 � MY COWIMISSION EXPIRES APRIL 15,2oos My Commission expires �l��r�. �s, a-oo� � Accepted on b f the Oregon Dep ent of Transportation �'r/ , 7/18/02 Page 2 of 2- DD gmh " u7/CJJ/177� t7�7:1 / 7tl,7�7C�l�/.7 A5f"�f�:Ql� �t�LE P(�� el r � .ALI'II.'� I'.1'rCiIN:'.I'.1ZIN�:i. 1N(', EX�IBIT ",A," LEGAL DESCRIPI'TON ' rOB NO. 500-387 RIGHT-OF-WAY DONATION HALL BLW. (C0.RD. NO. 947) A STIUP OF LAND BEING A POR'�'ION OF PA.RCEL I DESCR.IBED IN DEED �CORDEA JANtJARY 5, 1995 AS FEE NO. 95001169, WASH.�NGTON COUNTY RECORDS, LOCATED IIV THE SOUTHEAST ONE-QU�FTER OF SECTION 35, TOWNSHIP 1 S4CJTH, R.ANGE 1 WEST, W�J,q��"�-� ME�� C� OF TIG.ARD, WASHINGTON COUN?y, pREGpN,DESCRIBEA AS FOLLOWS: AI-L THAT PORTION �F SAID PARCEL I LYING EASTERLY OF A I.1NE 45.00 FEET, RIGhtT-ANGLE MEASURE, WESTERLY OF T�IE CENTERLIIV� OF S.W. HALL BOULEVARD (COUNTY ROAD NO. 947). . Ylnza Wedt • tiuitr.23U • 96p0 $W pak. p�riJand, UrrKon 97223 Qftior, 503-�i52-80b3 • Fzx 5U3-452,8U43 •wwk.al��l�•r-�•n�.r�un - F • F: :°l y��On Department of Transportation �� 1 11 IZegion 1 IZight of Way UI'. . .,Z,� � // John A.Kitzhaber,M.D.,Governor 123 N4V Flanders 59'...' Portland,OR 97209 Phone: 731-8400 FAX: 731-8458 FILE CODE: September 4, 2002 6007279 Donations Various Highways Washington County Victor Nobleza 1515 SW Hall Blvd Tigard, OR 97223 Enclosed is a copy of the donation deed transferring a strip of land approximately 15 feet wide along SW Hall Blvd. in Washington County from Brahmapremananda Ashrama to the Oregon Department of Transportation (ODOT). This document was signed by the President and Secretary of Brahmapremananda Ashrama and accepted by Roger Hansen on behalf of ODOT. This document meets the requirement that the Ashram dedicate a strip of land to ODOT. If you have any questions, please contact me. My telephone number is 503-731-8434. Sincerely, ;�? L ` '�� ;��hJ �' �' Jeanne Troeh Gibson Senior Right of Way Agent Region 1 Right of Way 503 731-8434 ,:�_ Form 734-]86(i(l0/97) �`�w' � ��, /�.� l ��` �Qt�`, a� .�� re on Department of Transportation � �"�"a�`� �:'I°' � Transportation Building 'iN'..�'. _�- ---�- .jZ� \� � �� John A.Kitthaber,M.D..Go��crnor 355 CapltO� St. NE �'r 8 5'9=/ Salem, Oregon 97301 FILE CODE: Augusr 27, Z002 BRAHMAPREMANANDA ASHRAMA % VlCTOR NOBLEZA 1 151 S 5 W HALL BLVD TIGARD OR 97223 Re: File 6007 279 Secrion: Highway: County: Washington Thank you for providing the Oregon Department of Transportation with the appropriare documenrs for concluding our rransaction. Your Deed and any Agreemenrs have been approved. The Srate is now enrirled to possession of ihe property. Sincerely, Hollie E. Groves Closing/Title Specialisr (503) 986-3642 Room #420 cc:,Jeanne Gibson Form 734-3122(4-99) . June 13, 2001 u � Shelly E. Holly C11Y Of TIGARD Alpha Engineering, Inc 9600 SW Oak Street, Suite 230 OREGON Portland, OR 97223 Dear Ms. Holly: The City is in receipt of your request for a twelve-month extension for CUP1999-00001, PDR1999-00002, and MIS1999-00026. Chapter 18.360.030 part D of the City of Tigard Community Development Code states that an extension will be granted provided that: 1. No changes are made on the original site development review plan as approved by the Director; No changes to the original site development review plan have been requested. 2. The applicant can show intent of initiating construction on the site within the extension period; By requesting an extension and paying the additional fee, the applicant has shown intent of initiating construction on the site within the twelve-month extension period. The applicant has also scheduled meetings with City Staff to discuss the completion of the conditions of approval. Additionally, in coordination with the applicant, the owner of the adjacent Hall Park Office Building has constructed physical improvements to the access and sewage line in anticipation of commencing further construction on the site. 3. There have been no changes to the applicable Comprehensive Plan policies and ordinance provisions on which the approval was based. There have been no changes to the Comprehensive Plan policies since the CUP, PDR and MIS for this site were approved. Having met these three conditions, the City of Tigard grants the requested twelve-month extension for CUP1999-00001, PDR1999-00002, and MIS1999-00026. The new expiration date will be June 13, 2001. Sincerely, Kevin Young Associate Planner City of Tigard 13125 SW Hall Blvd., Tigard, OR 97223 (503)639-4171 TDD(503)684-2772 � � � ALPHA ENGINEERING� '"C. Engineering • Development Services �rveying �'�� ` � �� 4 � � ��Q� 9600 S.W. OAK STREET SUIl t 230 RECEIVED PORTLAND, OREGON 97223 o�� I � (� DATE 10 _..!� , . ��U'� � �- (503) 452-8003 FAX (503) 452-8043 ^TTE"Tio TO COMN�.�:":J�;Y DFvFL�PM � �! RE: � � (;� T l - rso 00 �q - 000a2 � M l L 9. -�i - O WE ARE SENDING YOU �ttached ❑ Under separate cover via�Fax ❑Mossenge� ❑ Mail the following items: > ❑ Shop drawings ❑ Prints ❑ Plans ❑ Samples ❑ Specifications ❑ Copy of letter C Change order ❑ COPIES DATE NO. DESCRIPTION � � , r . � �� t . THESE ARE TRANSMITTED as checked below: ❑ For approval ❑ Approved as submitted ❑ Resubmit copies for approval ❑ For your use ❑ Approved as noted ❑ Submit copies for distribution ❑ As requested ❑ Returned for corrections ❑ Return corrected prints > ❑ For review and comment ❑ ❑ FOR BIDS DUE ❑ PRINTS RETURNED AFTER LOAN TO US REMARKS 1 /• �S-LQlr1Z COPY TO SIGNED: _ !f enclosu�es are not as noted,kind/y not/fy us at once. , �. - 11_E'f If� f�:AC;Itil�:f;IZI'�'( �_ I �'�< �. June 7, 2001 City of Tigard 13125 SW Hall Blvd. Tigard, OR 97223 Attn: Kevin Young RE: Swami Viswa Temple Expansion CUP 1999-00001, PDR 1999-00002, MIS 1999-00026 Request for One-Year Extension of Approval Period Dear Kevin: Thi� letter is a request on behalf of the applicant for a one-year extension to the above noted applications. As required by the City of Tigard site development review and approval process (Section 18.360.030) the criteria for the approval of such a request are addressed below. D. Extension. The Director shall, upon written request by the applicant and payment of the required fee, grant an extension of the approval period not to exceed one year; This letter shall act as the written request by the applicant for an extension of a previous approval. The required fee of$150.00 is included with this request. Provided that: 1. No changes are made on the original site development review plan as approved by the Director; No changes have been made on the original site development review plan as approved by the Director. This extension is requested for the above- mentioned applications as they were approved in 1999. 2. The applicant can show intent of initiating construction on the site within the one year extension period; and The applicant has full intent of initiating construction on the site within the one-year extension period and has shown intent by scheduling several Plaza WeSt • Suite 230 • 9600 SW Oak • Portland, Oregon 97223 Office 503-452-8003 • Fax 503-452-8043 •www.alpha-eng.��um • meetings with City Staff to discuss completion of the conditions of' approval. Additionally, in coordination with the applicant, the owner of the adjacent Hall Park Office Building has constructed physical improvements to the access and sewage line in anticipation of commencin� further construction on the site. 3. There have been no changes to the applicable Comprehensive Plan policies and ordinance provisions on which the approval wus based. The applicant's representative has reviewed past Planning Commission Meeting Nlinutes and has determined there have been no changes to applicable Comprehensive Plan policies and ordinance provisions that would make this approval incon�-uent with the current Tigard Municipal Code, Section 18. On behalf of the applicant, I appreciate your consideration in this request. If you have any questions, please ca11 me at �03-4�2-8003. S incerely, �• Shelley E. Hol y Planner Alpha Engineering, Inc. r I CITY OF TIGARD PLANNING COMMISSION Regular Meeting Minutes December 6, 1999 1. CALL TO ORDER President Wilson called the meeting to order at 7:30 p.m. The meeting was held in the Tigard Civic Center, Town Hall, at 13125 SW Hall Blvd, 2. ROLL CALL Commissioners Present: President Wlson; Commissioners Griffith, Mores, Padgett, Scolar, and Topp Commissioners Absent: Commissioners Anderson, Incalcaterra, and Olsen Staff Present: Dick Bewersdorff, Planning Manager; Julia Hajduk, Associate Planner; Brian Rager, Development Review Engineer; Jerree Gaynor, Planning Commission Secretary 3. PLANNING COMMISSION COMMUNICATIONS The Commission was advised that their TSP workshop scheduled for December 13th had been cancelled. The next workshop will be January 10tn 4. APPROVE MEETING MINUTES No minutes to approve. 5. PUBLIC HEARING 5.1 CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT (CUP) 1999-00001 / PLANNED DEVELOPMENT REVIEW (PDR) 1999-00002NARIANCE (VAR) 1999-00024 / SETBACK ADJUSTMENT (MIS) 1999-00026 — SWAMI VISWA TEMPLE EXPANSION The applicant has requested Conditional Use Approval to expand the existing Ashram (temple). The applicant is also requesting Planned Development approval to allow the residential use of two bedrooms for the residents and eight guestrooms. A variance has been requested to the access width. An adjustment to the front yard setback for a religious facility has also been requested. LOCATION: The site is located at 11515 SW Hall Blvd. The properties are also identified as WCTM 1 S135DA Tax Lot 1400 and 3503. ZONES: C-P; Professional Commercial. APPLICABLE REVIEW CRITERIA: Community Development Code Chapters 18.330, 18.370, 18.390, 18.510, 18.530, 18.705, 18.745, 18.765, 18.775, 18.790, 18.795 and 18.810. STAFF REPORT Associate Planner Julia Hajduk presented the staff report on behalf of the City. She presented a vicinity map showing the site's location off of Hall Blvd. Surrounding land PLANNING COMMISSION MGETING MINUTES-December 6, 1999-Page 1 � uses include a day care center, vacant property, and the Hall Corporate Center office complex. The Hall Corporate Center has recently submitted an application to develop adjacent vacant prope�ty with additional parking spaces, which affects the requested variance for conditional use approval to construct a temple and the Planned Development review to allow residential use of the property for finro full-time residents onsite and rooms for visitors. The applicant has also requested a variance to the access width. When the Hall Corporate Center office complex was constructed, it received a variance to the standards that require 40 feet of pavement and a 50-foot wide access. The temple is requesting to add additional parking spaces to that previously granted variance. The expanded Hall Corporate Center parking adjacent to the access drive bars widening of that access and therefore staff is recommending denial of a variance for additional parking and requiring the applicant to either remove the five additional parking spaces or widen the access width to meet the current standards. Staff has reviewed the plans and made recommendations that will allow them to meet all standards of the Code. Commissioner Padgett said it does not appear that the proposed construction will expand the limits of the property line. He asked if the proposed construction would preclude the purchase of the recommended right-of-way or the widening of Hall Blvd. for the Washington Square Regional Center. Ms. Hajduk said that it did not. Mr. Padgett stated that this question should become a precedent posed for all future development in that area. APPLICANT'S PRESENTATION Mike Miller, Alpha Engineering, 9600 SW Oak St., Portland, OR 97223, representing the applicant, presented a plan showing the currently existing temple, a dormitory which is called an Ashram, and the proposed expansion. The Ashram will consist of an additional building and the temple will be 9,000 square feet on two floors. They agree with staff concerning additional parking spaces. The temple has a reeiprocal agreement with the Tigard Corporate Center for use of parking spaces and they do not anticipate the need for additional spaces. However, they do request a slight change to allow use on holidays when the office is not using the parking lot. He said the expansion plan is simple; the site is approximately 2-'/4 acres in the shape of a panhandle and two-thirds will remain open space and landscaping. He feels it is a good use for the area, it will create some diversity in the neighborhood, and the shared use of the parking lot is complimentary. President Wilson asked staff how the shared parking uses would be enforced if a conflict arose. Ms. Hajduk said that if a complaint were made it would be a Code enforcement issue for being in violation of the conditional use approval. That use approval could be revoked if it became a recurrent problem. President Wilson said he would like to see this kind of use encouraged. Commissioner Griffith asked for clarification of the request for holiday use. Ms. Hajduk said that to avoid a conflict there is currently a condition that worship hours cannot be prior to 6:00 p.m., Monday through Friday. The request is for holidays to be excluded from this condition. This should be no problem on legal holidays when offices are typically closed. PLANNfNG COMMISSION MEETING MINUTES—December 6, 1999—Pabe 2 I The exclusion on legal holidays only would be specified in the condition for the variance. The applicant agrees to specifying only legal holidays. Commissioner Topp asked if any schooling of children is done at the temple, because some religious facilities do conduct schooling in violation of their permit and he wants to make sure this is not a part of the applicanYs intent for the variance. Mr. Miller said there is not. Dick Bewersdorff complimented Mr. Miller and Alpha Engineering for doing a good job in preparing this plan. Commissioner Topp asked if the limitation on the square footage for the residential portion was satisfactory to the applicant. Mr. Miller said it is. PUBLIC TESTIMONY— IN FAVOR Ave Pradhan, 921 SW Morrison, Suite 415, Portland, OR 97205, pointed out that they are not proposing an apartment building, so they would like to have some flexibility on the square footage in the event they need 100-150 more square feet. Another concern is the ADA requirement for more than two handicap parking spaces for a temple of this size. Julia Hajduk responded that the proposed condition recognizes the ADA parking requirement by recommending that some of the existing spaces be modified to be ADA compliant. She believes this can be easily done and should be considered by the Commission regarding approval of the variance. Sudhir Adettiwar, 16537 NW Paddington, Beaverton, OR 97006, said thati�e has nothing to add except that the applicant is a non-profit organization, they have a very large community of almost 6,000 families, and the temple is funded by donations. PUBLIC TESTIMONY— IN OPPOSITION None. ' PUBLIC HEARING CLOSED Commissioner Padgett asked for an explanation of the ADA requirement as it pertains to condition number 4. Ms. Hajduk said the condition is to revise the plan to show that five parking spaces will be deleted and that at least one handicapped space will be provided as van accessible and/or with a walkway. This would meet ADA requirements. Commissioner Topp noted that there is a distinction between the requested residency as opposed to apartments, etc. The 25 percent limitation in the Code was intended to apply to multi-family housing. He asked if there is any Code provision to allow more square footage for the residential portion. Ms. Hajduk said this planned development was designed to allow the requested use because staff felt it was an appropriate use provided the parameters of the regulation limitations are followed. PLANNING COMMfSS10N MEETING MINUTES—December 6, 1999—Page 3 President Wilson noted there is a provision in the Code to cover situations such as caretaker facilities that may apply to this situation regarding additional square footage. Commissioner Padgett moved for approval of the requested CUP 1999-0001, PDR 1999- 0002, and setback adjustment MIS 1999-0026, with the addition in Condition No. 7 for excluding all times on legal holidays, and denial of VAR 1999-0024, based upon findings in the staff report and the testimony. Commissioner Griffith seconded the motion. A voice vote was taken and the motion passed unanimously. 5.2 SUBDIVISION (SUB) 1999-000051PLANNED DEVELOPMENT REVIEW (PDR) 1999-00001 — MAPLERIDGE ESTATES SUBDIVISION REQUEST: A Subdivision and Planned Development approval to create 24, single-family attached dwelling units. The applicant is requesting Planned Development overlay designation and conceptual plan and detailed plan review as part of this application. There are wetlands on-site; however, because they a�e jurisdictional only, no Sensitive Lands Review is required by the City. The applicant is also requesting adjustment of the wetland buffer in accordance with Unified Sewerage Agency (USA) standards. LOCATION: The project site is located on the southwest corner of SW 87th Avenue and SW Locust Street; WCTM 1 S135AA, Tax Lots 500, 590 and 600. ZONE: R-12 and R-4.5. APPLICABLE REVIEW CRITERIA: Community Development Code Chapters 18.350 (Planned Developments); 18.390 (Decision Making Procedures); 18.430 (Subdivision); 18.510 (Residential Zoning Districts); 18.705 (Access, Egress and Circulation); 18.715 (Density Computation); 18.720 (Design Compatibility Standards); 18.730 (Exceptions to Development Standards) 18.745 (Landscaping and Screening); 18.765 (Off-Street Parking); 18.775 (Sensitive Lands); 18.780 (Signs); 18.790 (Tree Removal); 18.795 (Visual Clearance Areas); and 18.810 (Street and Utility Improvement Standards). Commissioner Topp declared a conflict of interest for agenda item 5.2 due to his assistance in the preparation of this application. President Wilson excused Mr. Topp from participation in the discussion regarding this application. STAFF REPORT Julia Hajduk presented the staff report on behalf of the City. She explained that the applicant is proposing a 24-lot attached-unit planned development subdivision with smaller lots and open space. There is some encroachment into a wetland buffer that is a 25-foot open space tract acquired by the Unified Sewerage Agency and not considered a significant wetland. Averaging of the buffer area is allowed. Staff has reviewed the proposal and recommends some conditions to ensure that the development meets Code standards and planned development intent. The development is not adjacent to Hall Blvd. Commissioner Griffith noted that there is a private street, which is something the City has been trying to get away from. Brian Rager said this was discussed with the City Council. PLANNING COMMISS[ON MGETING MINUTES—Dccember 6, 1999—Page 4 � � . N They felt it was appropriate to allow a private street here because of the size of the site � and because the proposal is for attached units, which have a different look than a typical single-family residential subdivision. Some of the units will be accessed off of 87th Avenue and some units off of the private street. Commissioner Griffith asked for clarification on why a private street is allowed for areas with attached units as opposed to areas containing single-family �esidences. Mr. Rager said they felt the look of a project like this is much different in appearance from a typical subdivision. One of the main problems with private streets in residential subdivisions is that they look like public streets and the residents do not know they live on a private street. In attached unit developments, the street is less likely to be mistaken for a public street. Commissioner Griffith asked if the private street will be built to City right-of-way standards. Mr. Rager responded that the only public standard enforced on a private street is the structural section itself, the rock and asphalt thickness has to meet the City standards for a public street. For width and sidewalks there are other standards in the Development Code and the Fire Code. Additionally, a private street is required to have a sign stating it is not maintained by the city. Other features have been added to the requirement list, one being that the entrance will require a commercial driveway apron. It is looked at more as an oversized driveway than an actual street. Commissioner Padgett asked if there are parking restrictions and signage requirements for a private street. Mr. Rager said the Fire Code restricts parking to one side of the street, and requires signage and painted curbs. Language can be added to the conditions of approval that the developer meets the requirements of the Fire Code. Julia Hajduk pointed out that the proposed plan does not meet engineering and street width policies for parking on one side of the street. The conditions of approval require widening the street to a 24-foot wide pavement width, unobstructed by parking, to meet Development Code standards for an access road. The applicant will address this issue later. Brian Rager presented a memorandum to be included in the record, which addresses findings regarding storm drainage and conditions of approval for an on-site pond. The staff report originally addressed the pond as a privately owned facility. However, the applicant has designed the pond to appropriately convey and treat water drainage from a public street. Therefore, the findings in the staff report have been revised in the "Effect on Downstream Drainage" section and Conditions 10 and 11 of the Conditions of Approval are modified. It is now being addressed in terms of a public facility, which requires that it be completely contained in a tract to be conveyed to the City. Mr. Rager explained the further requirements as stated in the memorandum regarding �evisions to the grading, operation and maintenance by the developer, and conditions for take-over of maintenance by the City that include access and landscaping. The applicant has agreed that revisions to the grading can be made. Because a new Condition 11 has been added, the other conditions will be renumbered. PLANNING COMMISSfON MEETING ti11NUTES—December 6, 1999—Page 5 Commissioner Griffith said that in the plan it appears that outfalls onto Jefferson Street require an open ditch. Mr. Rager said that where the gravel driveway is indicated on the plan is the location of the upstream end of the pipe. The proposal is for the pipe to pick up water from the backside of the units that front SW 87th Avenue. Discharges are indicated in the plan by rock symbols. The outfalls are discharged into the pond. The exit from the pond contains outlet structures to control the pond's volume, which is required for water quality treatment and detention of water in the winter when a different release rate and volume are necessary. A facility like this requires several different control structures for releasing the water. The water is released back to a line in the private street, then flows east out to 87th Avenue, and then as far south as needed to adequately discharge into an open ditch along g7t" APPLICANT'S PRESENTATION Gregory Kurahashi, 15508 SW Jay Street, #200, Beaverton, OR 97006, explained the reasons behind some of the street issues. They don't like to have dead end streets because they are not appropriate in terms of connectivity and making the project work. On the west there is a channel in the abandoned railroad that is fairly extensive from north to south where the water follows the railroad right-of-way. That channel requires a 25-foot buffer on both sides. This results in small areas that are not feasible to develop and creates open space. The area remaining for development must then meet the density requirements. To meet the open space and density requirements and make the site work for development, a private street is necessary. In regard to parking and street width, Mr. Kurahashi explained where separate parking is located and pointed out that there is room in front of some units 20 feet wide. This space and the required 8 feet in front of the units opens up the street for fire access. To create the necessary space required for parking, spaces have been made between each of the units. Concerning the issue brought up earlier regarding space in front of the units, the applicant agrees to move those units back to provide for 20 feet instead of the 18 feet in the plan because it still leaves enough room for the required 15-foot drainage easement. In regard to the issue raised about open space and the buffer requirement, this area is necessary for pond access and will not be developed with buildings. Mr. Kurahashi pointed out in the plans where additional space was made to balance the encroachment into the buffer area. He commented that this is actually better for wildlife habitat than space close to the buildings. They had to balance for this impact by moving the access around the corner due to the geometry of the building. They will use gravel or pavement, whatever the City wants for the access. Commissioner Mores asked if there would be a fence around the detention pond to provide for the safety of children in the area. Mr. Kurahashi said the pond will have an overall elevation of 3 feet and banks that can be accessed by pedestrians. Fencing can be put in if the City feels it is necessary. Mr. Rager said that the City does not require fencing around water quality facilities. The Public Works Department does not recommend fencing around these facilities because they have found that it attracts more children than it deters. PLANNING COMMISSION MGCTING MINU"I�GS—December 6, 1999—Page 6 Commissioner Mores asked if this is a family development, and also if the wetland area would be left the way it is as a buffer area. Mr. Rager said it is considered a mixed use development. Mr. Kurahashi said there is still an area available to create an open space that is usable for community recreation. President Wlson asked if Tract A includes all of the area outside the lots. Mr. Kurahashi said that is correct. President Wilson then asked if Tract A becomes City owned when the City would take over the pond. Mr. Rager said that is something the Public Works Department would need to get involved in because the City may not want to own the entire area. Mr. Kurahashi said they had no problem designating two separate tracts that could be dealt with separately in different ways. Commissioner Griffith inquired if something like grasscrete or grass-pavers, instead of gravel or asphalt, is encouraged for the access road where it encroaches into the wetland area. He commented that new products are available that might be superior to gravel or asphalt. Mr. Rager said he did not know of a situation where that has been used. The type of surfacing can be discussed as part of the detailed plan review. Typically access roads are gravel or paved to provide strength, and grass requires more frequent maintenance. There are numerous options and this is something that would need review by the Public Works Department. Commissioner Padgett asked if a conclusion had been reached about the 24-foot street width. Julia Hajduk said she is comfortable with recommending the deletion of Condition 20 because this is a private street. There are precedents where private streets that are 28 feet wide with parking on one side have been allowed. Dick Bewersdorff said he missed this issue in his review of the staff report. Since it is not inconsistent with what has been allowed in the past, he recommends deleting Condition 20, including the request for additional parking space because there will be space on the street. PUBLIC TESTIMONY - IN FAVOR None. PUBLIC TESTIMONY - IN OPPOSITION None. PUBLIC HEARING CLOSED Commissioner Mores moved to recommend approval of SUB 1999-00005 and PDR 1999- 00001 for the Mapleridge Estates Subdivision, with revisions to condition 10 and adding new condition 11 as noted in the memorandum dated December 6, 1999 regarding drainage and maintenance, and the deletion of condition 20, as well as the renumbering of the conditions as a result of these revisions. Commissioner Griffith seconded the motion. A voice vote was taken and the motion passed by a vote of 5-0. 6. OTHER BUSINESS None. PLANNING COMMISSION MEET[NG MINUTES-December 6, 1999-Page 7 � 7. ADJOURNMENT The meeting adjourned at 8:30. ree Gayno Planning ommis on Secretary ; , ATTEST: resident Nick Wilson PLANNING COMMISSION MEETING MINUTES—December 6, 1999—Page 8 � �� .,A /� l l `�/ /• //I/Ll ✓V I � II ,' I ��\'• . __ -' _-_..__.—' i ��_ ��1�;:/.._ �' . - - - ..r.>;. - _ � � �. R"��'--✓� L. .,32'� , _ - c �� i' '� � TJR��,��„i� �'��. , : % �y� �R F � i� �� '� , � , � ..�,�-,� 1z�• � � � ` _ •S.R/.�•�` �y �t 1 �'1 f-- 'Y ' l ,�1 f EXPIRES: 12/31/00 �p��l �r / FIR V � �� ` � � .L��1�� i�T ._i i�., , f�,i'�s'�, -� � i � a�nsioHs �� l�'� a0„ i �-; �i � FIR �,� 1 r � . / �� i � \ � � I� � ` � - is" _� ',' � i�, o F'iR � I =- WER PO�F . L �0..,-� ---- ---- / F(R�I\ "� � � I � -- � `� -- ; � - i . - --_ - . EY�ST�uc --�. - _ ' - � DRiVEVIAY i�. �� i�' I�� '� .. � ' � - -� . w LEWIS & �--- i.a.ravscn� -� � 40' �'I __ _: o °�° DECIDU❑ I� � I \ I � - a � n..m � � � ;:kI - -- ----- - ! -- - ----__ � s9�-__ - - - ----- ------ - - - - � 2 . / ` 4 I // "_.' _ 19�9� ' � � FIR �' 1µ ' �� - � �,/ � ��1 3��°`� � \ . � ��R� ��%��./i�� /��'` ��' \ � - �, ��. 1�,��IR �F ' � �� \ � "�. \ • ,_ ,,'� .:. � � '� . i / ,. .�'�, 12•• � \ \ ` � n,\ rr �r 7(�r t Tr �rr � i Tt�1�-�� 'sae�N•"�• . ' �F�R�� I Y / FIR � -� I/. \?. � , l.tl��LJ 1 Z�T 1.J L�. ._ �� .111`., E%PIRES: 12/31/00 � I � � �i �� ,i� �y�. i � =-a aeHSioris i , ciR -\` � � �c.o. -- . � _ ' I�- 1g,. .i '�x�:,. ie � i�� o FIR , +� I OWER Pr�� 1 � 4p' � � ' � - FIR�I ' �-�- ��" � � I�I�� 8 � �i lo � -�_ �sr !� �� ,iiii RIM 4. --- , ZE 7�9.85 EXISTING / i pRIVEWAV �♦ � .._ _ � I�i I�I�I� _ � � - 4p" �� s rr�.�� - a LEWIS & ��CIDUp '� i ! y� -FGJlJDCRO�:�R<Sh �� I L 3� � �\ I �1'ROOF CR.4A'� I \[4J ` __ I - � I �i F_.. . S-0.m500 �, � �J . �.0. -_ � � -- -� -- i_ ' ' -- � i- �--L-- _� ' __ � ; � i--- ------ � � � , � J � � -- VAN VLEET � �aMC�naa orz,c:r; �� ' , � �// , I �-�. � � / O F_.1� / 9 ; � � CONBULTINO C.O� � �EGI7'i 4'ROOF pRd2N� . j j �' � EN�INEERB IE 2i5_5 I.y � � I� i I r PROPOSED TEMPLE � - sm x�s.m�su�eas�.+�r+r � I N ; i +esso b�„e.rarry.oae r��+ , tudatl w,oreym 9706z I I I FF ?LV.� f�9 i f^ I �15�J0� � I f.> i SPNITARV MNNHOLE �(S03)885-1208Pfax� �<-RooF cwv+� I (BASEMENT ELEV 217.0) ''� 4.N � � � ��___ q RIM EL 229.25 S-.0.055�E 4�a I -K�� LIATER SERVIGE i0 I I 0 I I r HbLL.OFFZLE PdRK TNCl�IDE. 1 5�il_ RtM 2�6.5 � 4 i 6'FIRE WTER WiER VAULT EdSEM1£NT_`�- I. 4'IE 315.0 w1ER SERViCENTaSTiES I I 6"STS � 7 DGAtESTIC LUiH2 C �;Mc'v I TO TEMPIF AND HALL OFiICE PI•IiK FGR H4LL.OFFIGE PGRK M II I FdlNDaTION 5=0.0040 �C �� 7 IRRIrGTZON NATER , , R .,.�� INCLtIDES 8'SNAf�D FIRE 41h7ER 4t�TEMPLE/45HRLM oi � � \ I � M � II II, I DRl+IN �I 6"SLN G.O. » '.A ' �, I _ �� IE 11365, � � � b. '-' �' �,.1 � _ _ V ='w I • . � I I ..' ' �___ � I ' I �i �I I �� ',�.� -�, ' I � ' � _ ' '' i � i � � � i .� � i . .. i i 4RE<DRPRI 2 � \ - . .._ . � I RA1 2�K.5 �� I ..�_._. -, /Y'� ,$,y0 a'ZE 2I5Z C.O. 0. 3 PRESSURE SEV�ER TO NALL BUSINE55 PARK) !•-�ti I , �� II �N -"- ---_--_"�=�. _- ___ _ C__ _ _____ ___ 6'CRAVITTSEMER __' '_' 01 �� D(b ST1B FOR � -�'-3�59-t�[-�TO TENPI.E�- �S-�L'6�� I�I I � 4"IE ZI55m SdN MH PW/PJ 3 ¢11� �� . _ . __ -�C ._ FLOW . �EA.P.... ___"'__ ¢m�- z II _ � -\ u CATCHBA9N EXISTItiG "_______ _"-__'__'_.. - :v'.: ,:�_.' -��. � � �� '": I _ 6 O R1M 7320 - - - � < �� COttOM E 31I.0 RIM 7310 � � I'� . �'STS � I b IE Fi 31.0 W) '. f+� � �.��C.O. RIM EL 221.98 .. . . .. ,` i � I� � I�b'g31i.5 Ig � � a � T.=Sili. _IviKr.iv�..� I � I � � I q�0 h � t�ar�eo�an+e7e .-- -- - . INTO KiN'?FR-CARE �� .. i � .e, . . oastnvc ua�a ll I I� ": CONTRAGTOR TO . - � . � � ICB �.-":-� F3ElD VERIFY. _ . � ' . p �IM 719.5 . I3 SE 11t5 �,y . . , � w 'CI9 4'ST5 SE 211.0 ., ;� �� __ �_ � �I . Z i� Y4'$t5 � � 4°STS IE 1K.B5�.L�4'R N _ , � I ( 6'SAN IE 11�.01 � `�- _� . . \ . ,_ ,.. ■ I 3 ^ I / � � ti � � � �� '� . < z-°� � .�5r5, �� , !k=: - GONSTRUGTION NOTES: � 5=m.0310 � �� . � / �_�- I 'LL � I. CLEdNOUTS TO 8E 3NSTALLED dT ALL DONNSPCUT LOCaTIONS 4ND NFIERE � �I I I \�/ �-�'� � a , NOTE�J Oli PLAN. I � 4"STS IE 714.]4 I q•TS -� FF `2�9t , I -` � �. 11��p�{qp PVG FOR STORM AND 54Ni?4RT SEWER LINES IINGER OR LIITH.N 5'OF THE b'S�5 IE 214.15 � � ��=�0fi0 � I��-� .. �. � OUTSIDE OF(FIE BUILp2NG OR WITH LE55 THAN 15"OF COVER. <L�O?HER SEWER�INES TO i C.O. , PRO' � CATCN BASIN CE PVG 303�MdTERIGL � .- . i�N IO'pR4 RIM EL 220.85 .__ __"" � Ea �, ', � �. C�p 6 TE 3iI�0 �' ' I�G I I��1�.7• � -��4�' -- I-�'.:�_ �� PROPOSED ASHRAM � - 'J E,asrv.�st�xvxcES avauae:.e ro*ernP�E s:�: �� _ � ----r-r• _ e•�uA,�x� Q ry H i nbrp`-A�` � FF 219t (MATCH EXISTING � .._ __- z•oor.�sncuan�x�n� )r IE 114.0 6 y �.. Y IRRZGaTiON LINE �yJ Q' '_ _ _ -- ._"-. TORM ANHOLE 4 PRSMdRT POLER C•OrIDU+� 4 ... _ ._...' '__.._.. "' I ,�3� - RIM E 219 D '"'_____"_""_____'_'__'_'"_'"_____"__ l __""___-_'_"" "-'-__� � iE M(N 12")2t0.�5 7 TELEPFIONE�OlIDIIIT "'__ �Z ____ ' - _ �/� tZG W TER METHi w.Tr�CVA�ViCE.O SER/E TEMF'Lt. � 'E IN�E 12" 21G.B5 (� I jj'pOM1E5 ' ' + � - (0� ) "'-"-' '___ - , ' IE OU`(S 12')209.05 . . '_" ' ' O 41 � � - - � -� - ----.- ' ' " f �-an�r srnucnaxE rsi a n+M N aoi 3Q r+o xRrswarwr+n+Ere�x ro ee ixsraum�rroaz nrss cor+txx.. J� ''1 � _.... _ .._ _ . . `_•-'--�_--_ _ � 411 -- .- -- axn,�rz,ao ��. � �rsovroe r xr�c4*xa+sn,e o�oF eo�s.xc w.si ur+�. ixs,�u encK�_o� a o '' . . �- �6°IE T05D� DEYICE ON TFE TEMPLE STTE. �S. � � �UTZLITIES LECsEND SITE UTILITY PLAN 5 cm�wir�war.�am.on+�rc�r waxonure wc amme eiaioP.� 3� 4t�MAWqLE OETak Oh'al-EET C-4. CONTR.4CTQ2 To PROVI[]E ELECTR7Ga� �Vl � -��x"SdN� NEL�SGtdi6RT Fnc7 � LITTH F1.ECiRICii CpNTR6GTOR. ��/'� R --g5is- nEU sra�s.+san�z�taR r @ ■ carcra e<szN � � � N s � ---m'ST5- E�QSTING SiORM SENER `� • MaNHOL..E � . � L5T4LL lfdCKFLON VaLVE ON FOUNDATION DRCIN PRIOR TO CONIEGiZNG TO �N F V 1 __ I :� � 2� ,� � ST��. 41� NEL1 WLER �(��,�.. G�) 11T2LRY POLE OEGd�4'RG�F DRAA'FOR TEMPLE. SE 72{.0. Gn�� I-�O-'19 I N- E i Q 5 1 II J G F I A I E R /J, T F I R E M�D R d N T � O E G I N 4'R O O F D R 6 I N F O R d S N R A M. I E 3 1 t 9 DN- D01.1ESiZG NATER � n ' FN� FIRE IJQTER '�-' }� �� OO DOFMSPOUT LOGAiION5T0 RODF ORAIN. �E dRCH2TEC71A�.L ORANINGS FOR PRGE^?HC. qg!]� - G- I�H Ga5 Q �V� utZLifT vAJLt � � ' G- D�T21Y GPS [�T. 4 TRbHSFORMER dND P40 DEGIH FdRm4T20N DR62N. SE Nv.O. Sff DET4A �4 . SnErr uo ' E- NElJ ELEGiR2GAL _ � LIGHT POLE ' • . E- ��TING ELEGTASGAL •�•- II PL<GE 1.0 cy M4i.GLASS 1�RIP-RAP aT OUTF4LL. SE INVIItT F'F�ARON �. -�' N4LL MOUNTm L2GNT O SFLTION OF 5?OWd SBgR PIPE lAS£RHE4iM NTURE dIDSTLN6 TO CE ' C.O. GLEdN LVT � '� F1AE CEPGR7AENi GONI�EGTION -� MN M6N H0.E on M `/tLVE SCI£WLE 10 PVC D11V. � � C8 CatGN BASIN o O CLE6NOV� O DISGH4RGE D01�MSPQlTS ON SOUTN SIDE OF ASMRAM l7II7EGT4Y AYTO SWLE. ,� � ► TIfLbT BIfJGR 0� ------ --- - - --- - , --- -- __ - ---- --- - � --= �; �' �%�,� ° �� , � / ' � � �iz �- � - �r- // ��%�� 32"`-�..\� �j . ..�� % I�R�^A.��/// ��_/"e�. / ♦ r5�RN1J�e riD � �;�� iR � �� IV ( � /�' � 12,� / � ?,`• S T1 fTlf'- ! '1 .�-_i Yl,` � ; EXFRES: 12�31/00 � 1 F}R'� I��j FIR �,�� Y . �..�� I G\F I��.?�, _ . ._��.. a_�.,siorls � i � , � \ I 4p" � j � FiR \' I ' � L I � � \ I�_ 78,. � �. , y � ° i F�R � ,�- i- owER �c�E �� i � J I` L �a';�I� __ F�R I�� - . - r_ .. � � '.�� .. �-- � I ' i ' . �__F--- �, --- --, �, I �' � � - \ E%�5?ING I -,- .. ��.�. � - DRIVEWAY � ♦ J _'_ � i I � / i� �i LEWIS & 4�^ l� � (1 DECIDU❑ ;� � i__ � �� d -.� --<.� n �,--- -- -- -- -- - _ _ � � a2s.^ � � � VAN VLEET i i � :59 z ' 1 __ ___ . � !'. . coNSULTINp ."_.' _��.°_`_- i� ii I - ' . ; I ' - EN6INEER6 �5.!c � �', y . _ � . �_ li� I ' .��s.�5 �' N� ' 18880 ew boonee ferr road � � -�� PROP�SED TEMPLE �,�;9 �_s�_ � _ s.x�x�z-m sx�r+ease�r+r-. � �I� � - (so3)t�eas-e°9°"sos�v�e � - . i � (so3)eB5-7z06�a: FF 226A 4 0 � j - _ _ � (BASEMENT ELEV 217.0) 6-5 -,35 I - i II . =i?5 ��5 ' . _ 2 = 'SN'R�__ �' . .. G ];- �/ i LQ � ��LE�1 � �- f.r+�__ c.JE FtRR � M� II `_� E d5E ^�' ' Q.v_' .5 .�b.'S. - . ' � 5�'A£i7AT7LM P�NCF _ .' �E.J. , _� _� . , _ - ' 4R'ErnP�E�c5H2<" . � �I _ .� c II � 5�DETASL 5l�T G-1. 2 "' .9n , .�_'. . . � �. ^� , �... � � ; .. .. I�� _` . _ , . :.�. 'V�� '_` . '_ 6 ,I � � �. � � � � i =` _ -- `!,_- _ -,_, ,^''--. _ _ --_�:_ �----- 1-��' - -�__-� -- v I---�I ! =_�,H� - 2J1 1 � ,_��d7s �� s c�� _ - . . . ' � � �} � II � I ' � " Z6 5 BC.1. M �� y�p � �RE .,t'cd n 1=l 4". __ ' __._'-_- __ - "_"" -�_ _ _ - - -__'_ -__ - '"____ I ,yll � . � .'.�.-c 4IM c w .�_ �Cb�ra.+.i, �TDIGGRAVa) ,�� ______.- .______ .- _.FLOW _. ._._.._ _ _. __ � . _ I . ' � . � .C..i. 15 2.C.�i� - 02aVEL CnlIS7R�LTlOI'1 � MN '� �' . _ Sg�ETAL.51@T GJ. - �M .0 I � .II '�, . ..��'S.- ^^�.�.- \' .�..-�� . . '! __-._-� -��CATCHBASIN_....._ . �� . � ._ .- _-.._ _"__ _._ .. ____ -�� ___' '_:-_. .�� SE Z726 '. � . .5 � ' Sa�ETAIL 51$T G�f. " A ,R�M EL 221.98 � � -- . __- �. ,�. _ � _ � o . __ _ _ . '... .___-' . , '� . _- � � -��-� - I . . , - � .. yy � . .. __.. _ . . ... �i -il.: , . . �� / I I � �� ._--_ rrfi _ �� _... ._. , f`-. - a_._. � j ____-_.4Z ._'�""___ � � R�.+a�.�- � :?<,.-E r,►�.:�a , EROSION CONTROL PLAN-STANDARD NOTES eec-�;_-: � ! RExvM�,�c s*cnceRC nores co�erzcs.o�.�c�rRO_P�_aN=_ � � ----- aac.�a -- -- rz � -- -� (Fl2G 'E�._..a\CL_;yJ:CGr.GE'� ti^DGCK RE i:SEC�EB. ? i �i.E�6�,tYrTUI= �2�`? _ � ;ANTQ6 TGR G' 2�ST!GNp G'\TL'!r ER^JS�OU�SE MEtiT � \ � ��'�'��' 195 � K. 5T.^.RM CR4Ih INLETS.B�.Si�rS LNC..RE<'R'�\ 5�:.:.SE�°RCTE�'E� - . =OtiTR JQI� p.5TlhiCrSON NY t�.1E Cc TuE TEdR PER E „NTIi°4JEMEM SJRF�CES<R6 GGvo_E E� 1 � /EGEiARCV "-' - - "RC.'S N REYE4TIOh dVC S�IWE�T C04TROL P�G45'E I+�2 4L I$RE-ESi>B�ISHED. O - � � NGE 'dN gOpC�d�Q`FE9RUGR .q9a GNC JNSIp$Fi.ER GE L. PL'/EI.¢hT y�qFp,��S 4NC\IEGETLTIO"1 6RE TC BE P..A��GS RLP.��ti � __ '�.1.` GGEN� 'JE I.�i\6h� C'NSTRUCiION S�ANGGRDS.Re0 Y6-4�...HGPTER H. 45"OSSiE�E. � I�__ _ � _. GPPR JL F iN 5 ERCSIONrSECIMENT61$pN^ANTROL!ESG)PLdN�G£5 M. SEFj,,•PK y.�q4 gE�'ERFOR�NC�6TER TNAN SEPTEMpER;FpR E /'�/ � i . ' , _ _��- ` � .-- -- _ 4:J�W'I�LST'?J7E 6N LPq20✓AL OG oERMLVENT ROLC OR DRaIN4GE PHGi�pF,^�p45TQ�TZpN. �� 1 V DESIGh!E SIZE dND..0:'<tICti CF RCLDS.P:�'E5,RESTRSCTORS, � � CMANNE'S.4ETENTION FLCILITIES,UTILZt:F.S ETr� N. 2F iHERE IS EXP'JSE^5'JILS OR SC:�S 40T Ft1LLT 5?GB'.LIZ�Fl2� tiG'/EMBER i TNFiGVGu GPRIL 3C T-E.+E*.JE6TNER EROSZO\,.CN'�� I I '. FF 2�Jf � � � �-. THE I'MF EMEN?GTSOn OF T�SE ESG PLdNS AtL:1HE GONSTRt1CTION, MEAS��iRES.JILL BE.�.EFFEG'. SEE SE-TICNS 3?.�GNC 33 5. .E..r\� ,n O ��. ' � M4ThtEt1GNGE rzE=LaGEI.�NT,atiD JPGRACSNG CF THESE ESC uU:CarM'E ya!vCBGCC,FOR REGUIREmEhtS V� . , F4C:Z.IEa'S TFE RESPON526ILIii�OF THE aPPLIC6`11/CON`ROGTCR � - �� 9��. uNtIL AL GONSTRJCTIOiv 25 GOMI°LETEC<NO aPPROlEG AN� O. ESG ME65uRE5 SHALL CE REMC�/EC B�THE DE�E�G°ER,-u.E� /EiT `:�h � � � �.. .. .. - H M[L;.C.H`. `JEGEiSTIO,ti/v.H�SCCF'i�+u IS EST.�B�IS�+EC. IS FUU�PST?OLISHED. I - � � D. iHE BCUND�.'RSES OF t.:E CLE4RIYG LIMITS SHOUN ON TH25 PLGN SHGLL P� E.G.H:JTLII.E 8<4-B4i4,�a:�PRZ�R TC 4!vr uORK. Q BE CLEGRLT F�L.('aC�EC 1N 1HE FIELC PRZC4*C CONSiRUGTION. G:RING m FUTURE PHA�- PROPOSED ASHRAM . T"E cotis?R��no� �RI�c.r+o�.s.:�Re<HCe eE*oNO r.+e STANDaRp NOTES FOR SEDIMENT FENGES: ��+ � (].1. .'� -,�_, . F�CGGED CLEARIN6 LIMITS SN.fLI BE PERMITTED. THE F�<GGIIVG ' FF 2�JS (MATCH EXISTING � � � � __ S^i4L�BE MAINi4INEG BY TNE APPLIG?4i.'GONiRAG10R FOR TME W 6- C�RAT:ON!��:ANSTRU�TICN. � TNE F_�TER�L3(`cIC SN4�L BE P'JRG�LSEG I!�L:CNtIN CJ Q��__=.J' � O . � •i� ' '.'..,F �h.'LL TO THE�ENGi.+OF TF!E EARRIER TC 4JCID JSE OF SOATS. Nr+E�'� �' � �- E. ?NE ESG F4CILITZES SHONN ON T4I5 PL:.N MUST�CONSTRIICTED IN =0:M1i5 AR�NEGE556R*,FILTER GLO?H SH4LL BE SPLIGEC TCGE'�ER �O O �ABfTdTTON FBY�,MIGtL_ --- - - I� �_ - ��8/tllDiR�R�7'{rj[:qy,.� � '�'� ' � ' CoNSUn=:ICN WSrH 4LL GLE4RING aryp GR<MNG LGTINITIES,AND IN CNLY n?A$UPWORT PCST,t.IITH 4 MINIM�M 6-:�GH pJERLG .�hC T ��T��T�• � - --- �� - � - - -� "- ��'��+ SUG:i A M4NNER a5 iOINSJRE TH6T SEDIMENT 4ND$EDIhwENT-LGDEN �r!�ENCS SENREL+FG<iEtiED TO rHE POST,�O�✓ERL4P 7 X�� U� � � , 1 POSTS 4 C t _._..___.__ _ . � ;.. S151EW.R04L'IJ6 5,OR✓ZCLGTE N !.TGCH 45 SrpNN ON'JEiAIL. " . _. _-_-- :..: o P�CD�.E u<tEER THED QDS.<GE Y �� - --� -- -- ��-'- � -a ' . ._aJ?LE?5?rzuriu4E - 3. THE FILiER ca6RIC FENGE SNnLL 6E INSic�LED'O cC4L0�+THE � RIM 212.�D - GONTOURS NHE�2E FEASI6LE. THE FEYGE PG5T5 5�+leL BE SPAGEC< r I � . �� _ -- -. THE E.G FeGI�ITIES S�+O..IN OV iH:S PLI+N GI¢E THE MINIMl1M MAXIMUM OF b FEET APFRT FND pRIVEN SE^�IJFELY P.ITO'NE GRC�.r.� j O �i � -- � . RE0I.IREUEN'S-OR.ch ICi°STED iI*E CCAD:RCNS CuR:AG T�+E MINIMUM OP 18 INCNES. � +'�3� GJNStRJGTZCN�'ER:C�iMESE ESC FCCILITIES SNdu CE�PGR.:CED AS � � �I NEEL`E�FOR JNEi(!'EGTED S�CRM EYENTS 4`L."TO INSI,RE THG*SECIA!ENT 3. �HE FILTER FABRiC SN4LL HaVE L NI�IMIM fERtIG4L B.iF.: �_^F o I SI� GRADING LEGEND GN'J SpIME4T-LLDEN.J4iER DO NGT�E6VE TF�E 52!E. INGHES. ALL EYGAVATm McTER`SL FROM�I�'tT�GpR...rEti�E ��^ � EROSION CONTROL PL.4N INSTqL�6i1pN SNGLL BE 64CKFIyLED dNp^�MPp,TEC 4��'-E �N� W � - T�+E ESC F4GI�ItIES S.fa�L BE INSPE.;TEC Cdyl'g7 TME ENTIRE CISiURBED GREa. I . . � �x'Tt.""��'0'a_.M1� ��. �y[� �,.��' � 4.o?LIG4NT,',�',pryTIZACTOR 4Np M6I!�ipm�45 NECE554RY 70INSJRE ° �' ___....- ... � � C ' �Z<SiN i�� THEiF GONTSh11Ep FUNCTZONT�G. . ST4ND6RC OR HEFJ7 GVTY FILTER FdERZ�FENCE SHG�..L :E -- -- .NEN CONTOVR IVE ^ A1 NNO� `� 2 A s0 M4N15<CTURED ST2TCNED LOOPS FpR:X�"Pp57:ySTq � '_� ;;qrE_ �_�y_q9 �, � �' � -1. THE E5G FGGILI!I�pN Stra,GTI�E SSTES SHGLL 6E:NSPEGTEp AIP.� SRTGHE3;LpQ►5 SMALI BE INSTp�LE✓'JN TNE'JP HiL $aCE::'F" fi � �J- � � ..�FOLE - ; 7. Mq2ryT4INEC L M?NIMUM pF pHGE q MONTH OR L.'ITHIN LNE�4 NOURS SL�^PEC 6REp. � PCLLONi'I:G a Srp12M EJEN!. E%ISTNG SPOT EL£VATIpN /"J, �� .- �yppAHT PRO�ECT u0: 90�22 � �5<5 '�7 � y . :� 4T`JG RME SNA.1.MOFE TH4N ONE Fpp1 pF Sp�NT CE G,LL04Ep'C 5. FZ�TER FG9�i$.^,FENCES SHGLL BE RE*�OJEC NwE1J TF!ET MGYE SER�/�_ � NEW SPOT ELEVATION J -' � T'.1ER tFEF'JL!°JRP05E.S,1T F�`T BE�_^.RE T.��S�ppE p{ZEq H.::ScE� <CGJAMS.-LTE.+ii�.:�.q iRdPPEC Cai�H g4SA C:1 C6TGH D�.SSNS dNp ' sHET_*�c / PROV�DE STAKE. XE SPEC'S �+v4ULT Cp+vEr�v;��:t:ES SHC��C�EaNEG rR2GR*O!�oVIriG. F'ERMdNE4TLr PROIEG�ED SND 5'GCAiZ�. n � �* � -._. . 1!�GLEZNIMi OPERpTId+_.+c:�NpT F�{/5�.'SEDIMENT-�ppEN 6. F..fER FagRIC sENLES 5N4��gE:hSPECTm Bi -� • :1 EIFVATION � �.-^:SF�MER AN�J PAD t:4TER AT.^.TFiE CfJNNSTREdv SYSlEM B.M. BENCM MARK "b � E 30%COVER <�LZG4M:,^..pN'RK.?pRt SwMEpItT�t LFTER EGU�qa:VC6;.;,t�=.:� y �� ._�� 5?49 'p uRpJE ENiRGK�EC c.�q��gE:k5T6LLEC 6T THE i-E45�DdSLY WRING PRO�O!J�RST.IRGi�. A�T REOIARE;J RE�-45 /� � T.O.C. TOF OF CURB - .-�- JGHT POLE SMOLL BE M4pE iMME�$6TELT. B.O.C. BOTTOM pF CURB �� BEGI`��'h �'F GCNGTRUCTIG\LtaC�+AINT4:NEC Fp2 TriE pN26^Cy pF r M.H. MANHO�E '-' � N'ALL MWNTED LIGMT 7N<t G' � TME PRwECT. 4D.+. �..^.hl.L ME.:SlIRES MGY CE REQ:IRED�O INSiIRE �./ '-�' C.B. CATCH BASIN { � �IRE DEPAR�MENT CONNECTION �S�`T° .�ED eREaS aRE KEP*!�EaN FCR ii+E d,Rar.CN bF T�+E � � � a Glxaa�o EievatxoH -- -3- -- � •E�°-��, - 3 � SEF f.RnD9�Ca/'Lhti ; A d .°y8 g'+, '_ANCSCAP�4REA LqNDSCAPE AREA I ��^HV�.e NEW TOG501L " g q µq�,�.rpe NEW 10PSOIL � J �E �S S�R 7-0'MR•L Zofg �°4 � StRUCTL'RAL 5'-0"U.N.O. J ExPiFES lZ!7�/�]0 � OF DR4IN ROCK ,;°'�ao q PLdNS SLOPE 2%(MA%) �8 v�a �ax�r Poe i�i e-ii �i��l�� ' -..- rwsioras _ s rarea � 4 srRUCruFea�n.ans �-��-� � , � ;;-_ R ;, Fnsazc '-� �'a��'° �°' �` •�y � ��,� \ . dri° . eP�.. bb � I `b'OUTLEToPIPE i �;` � 43 coNGRETE sL4B PEIx ��"/�Y`Y � � • � � �� /J p STRi1GtuRaL PLdNS �/��\ � �� - �Jzi'��%`�� ra^v'.,�t� PLAN ,`wy� jy' �`Of COMPACiEO — �� CRUSHE�ROCK BRSE 4¢-4i.. .._ - 4'�IA.P�RFOROTED IXt42N 9 j4 a `•�pMPACTEO SU9GRa.'JE LINE. DQT iNTO STORM 5?GNO6RD FRGME / AND.raRAiE ORAIN STSiEM-CO NOt 4'8 � M4X 30' I CONIffLT TO ROOF DRAINS. • AalV 110" :'. .A�IOSCAP:a.P_c. 4 '7 � -. _�._�,_.� GO�TA+G PER �^ NE++TOPSOi� o �I3.0 e. •I SiRI1CTJRa;.P�GNS � �-0'u.N.G. �E�TT� �� ' b'OUTLET PIT'E ' .• � �� SLOPE21f MA% EOOLEO � i'CVILETPITE� �� G. I�I e'�' S'-G' b'-0' S'-0' �1 Four�,anoN �an� t�rau. ' ��—� �, � C4-I 1�2�-� ` • • MAINFLOOft II o '.. - � 78. IE 3115 '. `' I�o II ' �� . _- • �zn. zY HatuoFt.aiL I �' 1°� �° L E W I S & , .•. Sff ARC11. I v SIMI' $lfAr I o � � � # ""'�� •ov couPncim � . �� canuxHCS i e; ° c• .. I ` \ � 7123 CitU R �� 91ED OCK BASC , � 1 � �. � . . � � . __ ��: I� 7]15 6 7-O' 6 e II , \C04P�CTE�SUBCRADE g• � FAGE OF GID-DiNG 3.1% I I 2� I P4YDJC � �— � ••. 7�0' i �_ I n� - • — ASPHALIIC PAVINC AND BhSE ROCKJ SEG7ION A-A SEGTION B-B •�� \ • SEE 9iE P�AN FOR DEPTFI V A N V L E ET \ J 1A$PHALiIG PANNC AND BASE ROp( �E P4iI0 ARES \SEE yh hAN NOTES: i. S(,OPE ALL WALKS 1x(IIA%)AWAY iR�l�l BUILDIHC(5)IJ.N.O. B45EAENT 1 �� CON�ULTINO 6' 6' WALKS AGART FRpA BUILDINC(5)SLOPE TO ONE SIDE. 4�� pl7r�pqE7�pµgTq�7Iqy�qupppp�µ=TM qsn,4 G.n�g MiN MIN RIM]Ib ��6� �b,REf42NZNG HALL ENOINEERB 2. PRONDE NEAILY TOOI.ED CONIROL JOINiS AT 5'-0'ON CENTEk. ��_p 8'OF'}{'COA1r4GiFD 6ASE M4TERI6L \6'MiGH ExiRI1DE�CONCRETE CURB }. pR0'✓IGE EXGANSION JpNTS AT 30'-0'ON CENT�R �EG45T� ��7 TO�E RFDAR AIEETING 451M 4615 (�y SET IN EPO%Y. PRO�IDE JOINTS AT aNG AT WALK INiERSECTONS. ,�RqpE(,m pq l.�LpEp WIRE I.SETITI(,dSTM 6491 lydOSlll,OI�qOn 970EY 1�660 �w boone� raad 70'-0 ON CENiER MA%IMUM. �5Q}��S_aB05 Pf1011� 2 exrRU� curze �ras� 3 SIDEWALK DETAIL �P 4 �rRY �rau. �wa� Qua�.irY swa� our�r �J c�3��s-,z�f� Gf-� IT1-m" C4-3 Ir�-�p G4-4 I/4�:I'-mP U-9 I/t--� I .'�� 2�R11CN,30000 P.5.1.GRAY IRON, I // � � � /HEAW OUTY CAST IRON GRATE. Y l" / ' � '�SSPGt f..,�� / / , � �'�c� � p? > � A�,, r MM ELEVATION • I /�'� a 8 �rl' • s SEE PLAN h `��jt�� d 93OO ) / �'.3� ��d�°SY I �j'w7 SOU.RE EDGE / � " yM�.r ti . �� V L �� IPE INVERT �T bdR SEE PUN '. � - �?° � �mt iLfiv�TW1 5�I'LAN R4DIIS_�hQN. 0�' qL 7RAP M1iM t' ;l CLE6N PST RM OR/ p'�qTl. �Y �\ CLEANWT PLUG 1`� 7-�� —J ��, � � C,ROtEMbE.AS REaARED PROVIDE PULL W2DTH OF 24 —�-��a�1 E IN(alPESS/�a5 dRE4 NOTES: OIL TRA/'LQTM 4" A-CATCM BAAN TO 9E CON$TItUCTED Of 10 GAUGE(MINIMUM)$TEEL `9 C�.E,6HW7 pUy /� N1Ti AiL JOINTS MFLI�ED. CATpI BA9N CAN BE RWNO Ok$WARE. �FFENf�i0 AS4FE SOSL IS TRAPPm _ � ' � �•�'-'� ��''^'—�O� �''v`NG� B-CALK PIPE TO CALKIiI:.MUB. 4�q�q� ANGLE BOTH a�5 OF�Il'TER F'6pRIC C-$ET CAiCM BA4N ON fi'1HIp(COMP�CIED CRUShIED T 17 m Ca�St�l EN ROp(IX2 SAND BASE. � `� �o-�� 3� D-BACKFlLL ARpUNp C4TCH BASIN`MTM COIAPA(:iFf]CRUSMF[?Rf)(�( GAN�E RQ1ND _ E-^RILL(3)1'DIA.NC_ES iN'OP OF BASW EnCH SI�E. OR,OU6RE. �.�a�7 x 7 P�TS�/ ' µ - 9 CArGH BASIN DETAIL i i _ AREA DRAIN DE7AIL � 4Np dAAGH . �NLG i; =i-fl• �s-u . :f-m� � tOP VIEW i� � �_ 1?� �.�ANMaE�xAME�NO CO�ft � � 1.�. � FILTER FapqIC MbiERIA� CRWT �36'i.:IDE ROLLS FINISH CRADE /4"PRECRST CONCRETE / SEE VLAN ' �� ) � �EXiENS�ON RINGS. �/1 �_ � � (J�RINCS MA%IMUM OR 1J I �I � ` 12 E%TENSION MAXIMUM. � N � CURB INLE7 GATGH BASIN E Nm MANMO�E,�o � � Nn tirs � H @ ; �S. T : . :''/..i:�../� /:/i../�.i/./i: . STAN�AR�M.H_51EP$ .1 1. P�RECONFORMNTOLASTMCCO!]8. � �, , 2. Ay�GO�RE�IN PLACE CONCPEtE `� SNALL HA�E A 28�AY STRENCT�-� I I b'MNQM�M SPdGIN( OF J.000 P.5.1.AN�2"TO 4'S�.UMP. �m I I ', y- . 4 d J. ALl JqNTS TO BE RAM-NEN JpNT �� '—! \ � {. PIPE HIOLE�LOC�T10N5 AND SiZES>S �J r � r\ FRON I YIEW FLON PER PLANS. B"4IN 3E�Y.TE�.'NO'�_5 ��ZO � `7 DT 7 FIR OR PINE POSTS,� � STPIm4FiD OR pGTlQ OR ��W crsieL aLTtRN6TE: ST@4. iRECAST REINFORCED 1� � �rr.E rosts PLAN 60• �AANMUOLEASECT�ONS� r Q STITCMEEV LOOPS TO�E �� SmG��5 TONWE AND GROOVE JD!N' �� M INST SIDE OF SLOPE �I OvER Y x Y r05T5 pn[ � � Y J/��OIA.CALVANIZED�.RGr� FILTER F4GRIC N � FLON STfFS 8'DEEP r 12'W�^.E �� "; NiTH Y DROP. EMBEJ��D �� - ^ MATEF74�- DITGH COTTO�.+ 6•• 5 1 2� 3"AT 12'O.C.T1'PICA�. v' N BU2T BOTTOM OF �� r FSL�i MdiERI4L � / O��+ 1 POURED CONCRE?E 9ASE ^ IN B'61'6'TRETICH �J � (S)$ACK MiX .. GOFIPACT dLL dREAS OF �•\ 2500 pai Ai 2e":<.S D��E�. I-70-99 FA.iBi FdBRIC TRB�Cil / � � I �� SEGTION A-A o, o ;o o, e•con�P�c�c ig .� , oo�p a° '�o oo��crtnve�e.s� _ , SIDE 'lI�W �m,.� DIT�H INLET �`'� '.St ;`'� n�••- o•<-��z >eoto.Ho: °iem _ - �_«-:� ��.�o NTS . �1 SEDIMENTATION FENCE 8 INLET B4RRSER (BIO-BACsS) I m 60" DIAMETER MANHOI..E C � ^� � ERO-SEDF I/Y c I' � ERO-EB 3/4'_f � 4-q T1 I/�=I-0 � • _—"_--_' � -- � � ----- --- - - ---- _--- - - --- ----- � ��a�._ ' --- __----- - - g� __ �� - � _.. r_:�_ . � � '_ --' G 041Y-_ . _ .1 n � � . T\R�`�� I � � Plan For Grading, Utility and Erosion Control Review Only �� / 32"° � l '(�R�;s6 i�i��'� i �� ' i y ,��.� ,� �, �` " � �r�s,R,�,�� / � �� - -� ' i �KPIRES: t2 31 00 � �` 2^ � � 3 - ��-i�] ;- 1 l r� � f � . � � �FIR'� I� / FIR � � / �'�` � ,�ti�i � Li`...I ��d� --�� 1'.,,:.�_.i� � i V � V � �� REVISION$ � �1 r�� 4�� '._._! I j / FIR -\� ' � - -. �-. i �� -- . � � ��- 18' � . � i � �, �-- � � . FIR � � � OWER PO�E ` I � � i l �- 40.��i - --------' �1 FIR li - � _� A . / �'�\ � � $,3 _ - � �� ' ��- � � _�--'-- t � . --- - ___ . � ��i� - '_ _ " � '�--_ I __. .. -E%ISTING �RNEJIAY � � � �� . LEWIS & � � 40' �� --- `°�� --� DECIDUp � r - I \__' � � - «� - ° n4.r� i , l . -- -- -- -- � s �`- �� ' � --- �- _ � � � ' VAN VLEET ' I � � � � �� ` ` 774. '-'-�. . .� � .. . q ��'. .. CONSUITING �JF IfT .. � _ `_ .._ N I� -_ _ EN61NE[RS I 212.a Ib. � �� I I ... �_ _ � � � I�I 1BBudatln.bore q�on r9706r2ood -- PROPOSED TEMPLE 4- F- s.m x�s.m�ss�r+�a�+r , '! � (503)885-8805 phon� - FF 226.0 s�b.�s �,J � � � (soa)eas-�2oe tax (BASEMENT ELEV 217.0) �3.� h � I: I -�- - i SANIIARY MANHOLE . . . �.� � ` . L .. _ I RIM EL 229.25 � TA.W. 1PJ.0'X 15.m'SHARED 7.. � I6FiEd DRAM ' I ' - LIAIER V4ULT EASEMENi�� _ - RIM 216.5 216.5 I, FOR H?LL OFFTCk`PARK )M: � ' P �I 716.15 D.O.LI. _. . !,i_:• [4 .1'.I' . AND TEMPLE/ASHRAM , ' � � . � ` t � ' I il . ll� �"I ._ r _'� . •.I ' . 4 � � .t �. i � , -' � . . _- li � . � . � '.-- , . J� .- I `' n _i ..-_ :, ' , ' .6-�J . . _� M . �� . ,"� . . " . . r+ r , V� �� I 7tb.15 2i6 �.�5 Y11.8(T.ON. � 2 /,� - ._L ' "'___ i�_.. _ _.. _____ � . _` ' _'_.. �__ I � . 1. �� ._. 1 ._.._ . J � � � . 371.90 zS2.s2 � � _. . . .... . ..- _. ..__-� ._ � -.. . - ..- .. .:.: -._-_ _ _ . � '5(T.O.C.� �� . ..: � p dREd CRFIN 3!6.75. .O.N.1 �, � � � ._ . .. . . ( /Y�� . ,yVC � �i SAN MH -__ _ � 7 r W Y i .. .-19._\ -�16.�5RIM�I65 1 4 C 4 ; 731.9 . � .. _ - _ _ _ __'_.--_ - -___- _ '�I _-__.__ - __ __ -. .-._,_ �. S.O.LJ. 2W�5�OJ�.,. 22L2��L. - � '_.- .. ...._ �- � � � �' � �O_C.) /I i .. _. . FLOW -.._. .... .. RIM .0 � _ J 'I ' . - J� ` ��'-. -..-._.". - . .-. _ ._. .."'_ '.'__'_ '_'""_ I � al.5 19.5 5 ��--..,'_- �� 73i. �___-_ '_--�„- ,.� � __C'RM EM BA519b .. � - - . ._ . . ... _ ' � , \�i9b '_ _" - _ _ _ IE73�6 '__- --�-._ 'i � - �„T.O.N. . 9 _ . ... � � � '�i �� i ,, '� � � � �� " � _ , ��) � ..; � � � ,_ I � - . - _ - __ _ � 3 �.}/ _ .`L''^°�.�Y .�� f�i�:..�. } _ _ � � I \ � � � � � \\ G 4 \ � �9.16 � A -r� .RIM 1f9.5 . 3 4' � i 9 Z /� Z19.4� -- -.- � / � 770.7D � ��F I 1\0�5• � \ �S � Clj REMOVE EkIST:hG G1RB. MATCN EMSTIIY PAVEMENT ELEVdTION_ � � _______ ."""_""" _ _"_ . O id4D5CGPE _ � 3: 0 .""___ 2 GOHS1RUC`E�RRUDEp CURB. Sff DET4IL ��4 � � cf�G \ i � . Y _ . . . 319� � _- '_ . O P4VING SECTION: 3'G.455'C 65rN4LT ^, � �i � - 1. -- e'ac�a*e 01`t�') l.� O4 ITETALL HANpRdSL. 5EE qRG+27EC'URLL d2G.1IhG5. � �rc UR i i ' FF 219t � � � Z ��CATpI BASIN ' '_'.__ '. ._' .__.. . . _..__...___' '- .- R�MEL220.B5 \�i��- - � � _ . .. J-: 2 .- � ' �/ �, 5:0 m150 E_V]I"7�/ � , � '" � � T - � PROPOSED ASHRAM � i � -- --�-�- o � .. � a�, FF 219t (MATCH EXISTING � � - �3s �� (�/ ; �;,.� �z. -- - --• .. _..\__'" __ ____ __ ______ _� - B ") �. ''-STOftM MANMOLE ��Z 1�.Lt� i = '��_2i3 � R,M"2,a.so �� SWALE GRO55 SECTION A-A �S° V � -- - ---- � C � .-.s. ��W I �5 •��3:3 O,ITLET 5 R1�CtURE � Q O I�I RIM�i]0 �� .. . -- _'_ � ��216 . 5 ; _ � i -.. - ."- �- . _. � _ - � - . -- ��; �3a � i SI��GRADING LEGEND SITE GR,4DING PLAN �,�`�-,� � � i . - .... _ . . E%iSTING CCN�:iJa�,_�^�� i5�:5.1 yLk �i✓ _ _ �-20 � i ` � � C..T�M 6ASIN � -� `�155i�NEW CONiWF'JNC • _ OO • MaNii�L� �O � :0 a¢' 4 DriE�. �i0-99 � o�:� -o- t unurr ao�.F - - �� Ex15T�NG SPOT ELEVATON iQ. /�� FiR[nrJRAN! PAO.FCr rvG. 9B1Z� 4' � � S�fEEt HO 154.5 NEW SP07 ELEVATION M M /AETER �, �- >RONOE STAKE. 5EE SPEC'S � Uii�Ity yqULi ��_ EL ELEVAPON ❑O ❑T TRFNSFq21AER AXD PAD � B.M. BENCH YARK � � �A.�aaX�o,�a Q_ SWALE GROSS SEGTION B-B T.O.C. TOP Of CURB =�- uCHT POLE C j N.T.S. � � B.O.C. 80TTOM Ci CURB �'� �� -�- - - wqLL MWNTED�IGHT ' M.H. M�NNOLE � �RE DEPARTMENT CONtiECTI�N - C.B. C�TCM 949N �G i ` _-- __ � , �� _ .� . -- - - - - - - - - - - ---- ` , =��_.r. --�--a95, ° --- - - - - ___ 2 .i � �// _ _ 989, . �/ R��1�� 3��- - % ��R�g�^�2�t�/i�� l �w � �. `, �� IR _ _ �-� �� ,. ' � �j(� ��'.�. t2" � Y� ` � �r,tr �-� ._i. J` r.., .�� -� rsnnu+`"�� /� I f � � \ / �`�.� �J 1 I'''�1 1 .- ,J 1� E%PiRES' 12/S1/00 � l FI A � i � LV'.��_ �� _ �- �`'.v � � �°' / . \ �� \40�. / ��\ \ �-� RE�nSIONS I FIf2 -�l � � �� `�C.O _ _ 1 / / \ „ `' I / \ � I 1- �8�� /�Ml�i IR . o 4 �WFR F� / FIR � 'i I ' OLE � 1 � 40,I� ,... �� FIR'�; - � I �-- . i � ;V' ��o ' _ , � ��S i ; �T� �I� � �, �I° �a�� i J ---- , . IE 2i9.85 \'�j ( ExISTINC i� DRIVEWAY �� I � � I / I� I I I_ ._. , w I 4�" � �- . � . . � . 2 LEWIS & , nECiDUO � � C_ ��, � � C 4•�ROOF DR6SN-, rFOUtJD4tION DRAIN �� . �_-__ I � ,'- d I 5-0.0590 � I � . C.O. I, I-- �_ __ __ __ II, ,- 1� 1 9 I z I I /� �-�___J_._� � t i --1-... � 3 'I i ' Fwr�arzaa;�arn\ - ��J �� -- � I VAN VLEET �, ��/ � I I - ; � CONBULTIN� I � OO �. � I � � ENOINEER9 I ,..^..� OEGIN 4'ROOF DR4Ilv w . JIE 214_5 I� � 3 18860 M boonee Iocd � ( PROPOSED TEMPLE � I� gm x uo�swn�as�*+E*+* � FF 226.0 r !� ,s.00 � � (SW)e885-�88 59�e _ QQ<•RoaF owzr+� � � (BASEMENT ELEV 217.0) Y� .,„ `DC ' ��I F- �� ^R M�cA�zz9�sH�F «3)885-1206 fax s-m.m5mm �� nr�n � -� �, I w*Ers sc-rsvtce ro 4 I �: � am.a x�m sHar+w . ZK.S H61L OFFZGE PdRR INCLISJE _.�� +a�x sEavres,iurns�s uare�x v.�T cnsen+eNT�-�.5 I -�� ', I � I'IE 215.0 �� 6'F1RE Ll4TER - . I, I I � . 7 DOMESTIC 4l4iEA FOR HALL OFFTCE PARK M , . i,515 ' y�G4tt�� -SI�EWPLh EP';Fi:ENT � TO 7EMP�E At0 H.4LL OFFZGE PARK � FDUNDATIDN I I S�..PJIm�10 I .' 1 � � 'J`�p' X ' "J� INCLUD6 B'SMAf�D FIRE:IATER AND TEIAPLE/dSHRdM 9 \ 'm f 2 /-� - I GRAZIJ� b"5<N G.O. T� � ` _ .. _ . . r � .;: � � IE 213.6 � � � � ��_ I ' - y�/- . ' _ V 2'W 1�^�I � � ' - -� - � . II ,I q .. � � � arzen.�a<rn a � � u -- -- - - � !� .' I I RIM 2b.5'•. \ i ., : �. - m I»�� 4"k 3�c,y / � C.O. C.O. }`PRESSURE SENER TO HALl BUSINE55 PARK w � y v � _ '_____"_' __ -_-"_'-C._'_'_'�______-_ 6'GRA TY � � 6�k "'_ ___ '- VI SEMER... . - _- _ -_ -_ _ _ - � _'- - - , ' - '_ _ - � - .� _' _ _ - ' ' I I 5-0�� D4".a STIB FOR �_- '-�'-'-_ _ "��-_-�.'�� `t.0. �'.�St1RE 56��0 tFMPLE "- -___ 5��.�,... __ _ . . � a^:E 315 5m / 3" SuRE$ENER EM$RNG � � � �SaN MH PUMP-/ r� FLOW �E.O.P. R4dYK.O '. . (r � RIM 217.0 - . . _ ._-_ _ _'n-'= '__-___." ._ __'_ _'_.'_"' __'__' ' N COttOM �I.O RIM 221.0 � IE 7]2b � III . `"�5 I b'IE IN 31.0 CL+) . IE 319.0 - - � _ r� _ �' -- � �. 5-0?J40i2 / I __- �_- �GATpI BASIN I. ; ' �_.__,. �� _ . C.O. �� RiM EL 22t.9E - ' �, I I � � i i �4,5 � a Y FXI�TIN- EhTRFtJCE i F-�-1 ..� I 1� � ��n�� ' ,,, INTO KINDER-CARE � r-'�� ; � m. � ocssrxr�cuarox. A�'.,,_,'- � ;./' ., coHrRacrax ro � � cgto v�-. � �s ==--�- � I C�� ;g z�is Q� � � � �� s'STS IE 7I.0 � � '. J'� 4,5� _ +_ __ �� _� �� J �I 'I 1'STS IE Ib . _� R� - _ - . `y' � 6'SGH IE 4.m� �- � � ■ 3 Z ( ( ' \'�OO a ! � .� � .�TS � �� _ � � GONStRUGTION NOTES: � I �-��, - n � �(� I `oI� � _ ��- , . . � N ;. GLEGNp1?5 TO BE IPi5T4LLEp AT 4LL DA�NSPWi LOC6TION5 4ND i.INBiE 1 1 C[- �1 AO?m OM1 PL.1Y. W � , <"STS SE]i4.24 I 4 �J I � r r 2 I 9t � , ��O ,.:.. " �, �SE SCHEfTJ�E qm pyG FOR STORM AKD SdN2TdRT SENEl2 LtNES tJNDER'JR WiTHI!�i 5'�THE 6'STS 14.1 � ��a, � q175IDE pF i�#pUI�pING OR N:TH'.E55 TH4N i5`OF rOVER. aiL OTHER iF.IJER l�NES TO � CATLH BASIN BE PVG 3034 M41ERIaL- .0�0 / I I� RIM EL 220.B5 1 y�y�� y-�� 7 . __'�'�.O. e"S.qN G.U.� EA � ._?._:.�. ��G 1 I�O I GJ. � �� ..� � I H !��fURE PHASE II� PROPOSED ASHRAM ,,.,,,,,{, QQ e�asrn+�se�xvic�snvnx�na�eTO.e�..esi.e: � � b"pI1TF6LL � . , � b'FIRE I.W1ER l.1NE j C I `, roy„� I FF 219t (MATCH EXISTING � __ --- s°�s.icu.,rErzune � 'IE 7i4.m ' �"IRRIG4TION LINE � H - - -- -""""-"-. ..--- -- '" �STORM M0.NMO.E y �'PR2MARY POI.�R CONIXIIT J �'_"""'."'"" "...; : RIM El 219.50 2"?ELEPFIONE COlmllIt ��Z ----/ .'. .� IE IN(N 12'J 210.75 �(�O � 13 "_____�____'__"_ __"__"____"___'____'____ �--"�-'"'-"_-_'_"-'_ "-"---�""�-----_"- . iE iN(E 12")2t0.85 O �Vj'OOMESTZC WATER ME1ER 1-IITH KVA C£vICE TO SERVE�EMPLE. iu ---" ` �aes - --- -- ---- _ _ w ----- -- � srnucrurx�raaUa�n1 W�sh � r+o ux�u�arw�+r�ox ro ae n�sr<u�o ur+oe�rHss cm�raacT. �� " �-- -' ' -' _ . . . .__ , . - -°_-__°__--'- - � ---- - - �_-_._. � " - __ 13.00 � O4 PROVIDE 7 IRRTGATION SNC OFF OF DOMESTIG W1ER LINE. 2T15*4LL BaGKF'�..OU Q O . . .. ' �� 6'IE r050 C 4 DEVIGE ON ilff iEMrLE SIiE. �S Si I L U 1 iLi I ,r� LG{.:iGl`LLJ �5 GON5TRIGT 60"pIA.SANTTdRT MANHOLE Ld?N RJMI°. SEE ry1Mp SpECIFlGATIDNS 3� �' [ � � _�� SITE UTILITY PLAN arro Mar�w+o�oerm or:s«�r e-a_ eor+Tw+eTae ro rr�ovms�erue« W�n� - -='scn- �+saru*<a- v �N�c�ceuu.on+c to�. coaxoxw.�wcarwN wTSme auLCn� }--� �' -'''--�5nlr- EX'S*ING SnhZlcfzl �' � ��=� N� �N H �/'1 � aurai..�eaacFwu va�vc ori Fwwosrwr�pz.aal Rzrore ro eoru�etv�c,c V 1 � c� �--s5i5- NEN 5?ORM SENER � ■ carcH ans� �. � � � sroan+�aE. ---s'STS- EXISRNG$TORM SE46i C � M4NtKJLE �.. O 20 40 (J BEGIN 4'ROOF DRdIN POR TEMPLE. �7J4.0. - H- IEJ WiTER �Q) �Zl t1TTl.STT POLE - W- E]QSTINCa NA1ER BO l�ECa2H 4'RWF GRAIN FOR 45FR4M. IE 711.0 iQ. I� FIRE HTDRANT Cnrt. i-Z��a, DN- pOMBRC NATER '� ❑M � �T� O9 GONrEGT DQ.IN51'p115 TO ROOF OR�lM $ff 4pCN21fGNi,4L pRq1.4TIG5 FOR PRO.[Ci NG. qgll2 FlJ- FIRE FIATER � G- N6J GAS ❑O rJ JTRStY Va1Li DOUr6POVT LCG6iION5. i G- �Qf.aTINC GAS 4. 4 1RCNSFORAER dND 1'dD � BEGDI FdNDdTtON ORA1N. IE Nr.m. 5�OfTISL C 4 SnLT*Mc - E- N6a ELELTRICAL _ .`�_ �IGIiT POLE - E- EXISTiNG ELECTRIG4L �• � 1I PLAGE 1.0 cy MIK GLA55 100 RIPitAP dT Q17fd,Ll.. �` N4LL MOUNTED LIGHT ClIILD4Y.To BE � f_ IE INVERT ELEVAiION 1 O SEGTZON OF STORt�1 SEFER r1PE WDE7UEATH I'UfLRE FIRE DEP4RTMETIT CONIECTION . G.O. GLE6N OUT K { SGMEDULE 40 PVG�i1Y. - MM MAN NOLE � M VaLVE . f! DISGNARC+E�04P5PWT5 ON SG1TH SII7E OF A�JIRAM OIRECTLT IN10 S+A�E. CB CATGF!045IN O O :AE4NOUr ► T�RJS�BL,^iGK Y ; _ _ - --- ----- , - -- - - - _- �� - ��<<. -_ _- \Z ;'�.' ' - ' . I � R�� L' '�z�/ � ^� / , ; TJR��g•;�� F'�� ' � i r y� �R � � i, �` � '� �r�'�,�': i ��2�• C* 12" � �., . � x G.�..irnr�� -� •-� . , ��, exa�ees: iz/3i�oo � 'FIR�I �r � FiR \ -� i "�� i'_t I�, 1 !,: ; }-�� . ;�,�', �i �` � V �� pcnsia+s i' �-1' 40,� i �-- � - i j ; FIR -V� � r __ �- �i V � \. - � � �1_ 1g�. i �� '/ j�o � - FIR � , � •� rJK`ER POLE � / \ ` � � L 40.,;�'�! . . - �� FIR I� _. , / ,: i ,�A ._ � i.. r' I�1� . ,_ . � � � ��',�!I.��i� I ezisnNc I, '-'�--' � �-� DRIYEWAV � -p_ .,�,�'if�� . / �li .�'.•TiNS LEW19 & q�, ii„ � �_-.�_ � , DECIDUO ��" � I �5 � � � � ' a � ` ,� �I � -- -- -- -- � _ _uS.Z '`; � � �. � i � , VAN VLEET '�. i �9 � . � . �i �--- --' _ � _ � -� � � coHSU�nHa �� _� .!�x - � 3 I ENOINEERB r_ ,I �' :_6'IS . �✓4 � � , - PROPOSED TEMPLE ?�•.� _ ,� .��E�se.��:�-. I �eaeo�w toonn Mrr�roae FF 226.0 �S t�aa<i�.a.y«�s� 2 � . ..., � � � h ��SOJ 885�206�faz� • ' (BASEMENT ELEV 217.0) ' --��g5. � - � _ ,j ' ;" .:.-5 - �=° � . . ^ � -.5 �.. � 30.E'x i5.0'SHaR'E.^- ' ... �� '� II :R RLI�_ � -� � WATER V6ULT EdSEMENT �'=��.�- i � ' �� 6.`5 � - �T FGR HA�L L:FI:E F6Fic �M E -_ . . _ , q4_� _�.'Nr d � aNC tEM°'..E�tS.+rzGV � � �. � SmL�TrLiION FENGE � ....•. �`5✓ '_ .� . �...._ . _ � " � SEE DET.4IL SFffT G-4. , . ' �. � . . � }� . __.. .,•.„�, c ~ j � b ' �-._. , -,� ...�� i � -'� �� Y� �. ab ,, � r , .. , . . � i , , , � � � . . � i i � �� - �' � ! � �,_. _� �.-- .��,� � .,c ..5' - -- � ..:--_ . .__ "___' '____" -_". _'. .. . -.-..... ' "_"__ -..___.. ___"""__ __-_ _ - ..___ ... �( oC' Nr __- , .�..�L . P� � 'J .�_._ �_.�.i--. ' _. 26 5 EC...� _ _ - _ , � `. � . �¢E_ R� ti c�n ._.. ':., m i �YvO . �-_ 4 5 � 5�AGiT.�.b SYQT G�/. " . _ _' '_._ __" FLOW _ . 4 �_ ._ _ _ h � II '. ".. ,�.� bT.....� ' � "...-'- _ __ _ - _ . __'-_..-_. - '-_-__- _.'... .o�5�E.C...�:�. - .." QPI�Ya� -_' -- _ SA \ N ` I '' - .o ': ' ` �fd10 QAV9.) � __'- _ ' '__''__.. . .__ . ..__..___.._. ._ ______" __.-_-_..---�.. _:... �6.0 �I _{� _ IE TI2b -_ � �II a"1 - � ' � T.D.I.i.� "_ ��._ ._... __ �- . .- - . _ - � ti . . . .'-- _-_-- �n. � . �� , �CE11.b slffT G,s. � k'�. ' .._ :�. � _�.9r+ 4. . _. . ..__. .. :_ , � _ _ ✓" __ � . -� .�_." ', e�• � � - � , . . . _ .,_: �; ,�{ i ' _._ _..__ ^ T� J I� . . �__ � . ;:r� �! � Re �._'-� �E ¢� .�, EROSION GON7ROL PLAN-STANDARD NOTES =�_-.�-s L1- I3. RE�.^.r.+'�N.^.E i Sr:.hCGRC!.CTES�'JR EROSj��C�TRJL°_..�`_ -� � !FQCV TE�..h�.e�!��:CpNCE nSNpCGC1c.RE`/25EC�EB.'�'. �.:. ' __ _._ I � i�G^ E,� __- ' `-O�TR4CTGR HGL�IASi1��dhC MATITGIh ERCS:GI:/SFL'ME\ \ M.C'T C4�LI@t�MICAL� -' �2eC - � �DlTAII.51$f G-�. �5 -- - - ' ,. = �i 2�_\ \ � .._\ \._EE.- 2. _� oc c4�"c"E": � I - !_�titRC DUR!.,: ONStq�r_'TSON'a�l T:ME OF T�+E�ELR� ER . . �._� re .. e �r�E -�•�E . .- -• •._� O ; _.-.- --- ' 'E¢i5 ON PRE�ETTION"GND SECIMENT CCNTRC.rLOUS�EC''. = EE_� .B._ E �� '- '� ` ' � - .__ ,�� G C�,yaNGS�Ec:.EOCK DdTEDR�'JN STaND RDSURfO 96 I�CHGPTER g, P�'yENEtrT SuRFG..ES<N^v'✓E..ETA'ICN.iRE�C 9E FLI. Ei GS RL=_�_� � � I ' 1 . .. � GS PCSSIS�. � . ._ �_� ��9 _ i ' - � .. . _.. B. 6PPR0lGL U?ETd�4F�IOhi/SEDIMEN?bT20N GONiROL CESGJ PL4N DOES M. SEEO.TIV SHA��@�pERFp{IME�pp LdTER iN6N SEPTEMBER�F:JR E--- /1/ N.^.T GCNSTIT RCJtL OF pERMpryENt ROA�OR DRASN4GE pN65E OP CCNSi�wt�ON. �y � DESSG�!E.G.,5I?E dNG LOC<T:ON OF hOACS,PZPES.RESTRSCTCRS, «. �i',�_ � - I - � CHANNELS,REiE4TICN FGGZLIt�S,uTLST2E5 ETG.j N. IF THERE i5 EX�'OSED S:Ji'�5 OR SOZLS NOT FJLLY STaBI.SZEC�RGV � � -� ��G/EM9ER i 1-�RGUG�i nPRI�A,THE NE7:+F..CTNER EROSiON COn*FG_ � 1 � FF 2�9f . , � C. THE:NPLEMENT4TZON CF THESE ESG PLAYS 4ND THE C.CNSifTJCT?ON. MEaSliRES w:L 9E I�EFK�T SEE SEGTICNS 3.3.��ND�3.9,TECH�'C.:� /(� �, II MA?NTENANGE,REF'LACEMENi,4N�JPGRGDIM1G OF THESE ESC GUIC4NCE�IGI.LBp^J�c,:�REGVLREMENTS. V' , ' FaCTL?TIES 25 T-�E RESPONSZB?LIT7 OF THE APPLIGFNT�GON�RLGTOR O II ! - aTC.I d;�N JNTIL A�L CCNSTR�'ION IS CCMF'LETEC 4ND dPPROVEC 4NC C. EY MEa5JRE5 SHG�L 0E REMOVED BY THE DE�/E_C°F4 w�.�E`� �F��'_"�'. � � �- � - - - � � ftM E .u.ES VEGE?diICN.�L41iDSCdPING:5 ESTGpLISkEC. SS F��Lr E�?SmyeHEC. � ' � - �. iME BOJNCGRIES OF TNE CLE,6RTNG LIMITS SHObIN ON TNIS PLAN SNGLL P� E.C.!+OTLSNE B4a-84J4,GLLL PRIOR Tp pN\�uORK. Q _ .. .-_ BE GLEAR�Y FLG6GEC iN THE FIELD�°RIOR TO GONSTRi1RION. d1RING � PROPOSED ASHRAM ��'''---�� e ccvs*rwcnon�xxoo,Ho oxsruReavice eEro�.Ne STANDARD NOTES FOR SEDIMENT FENGES �� Z � . •' - ��/ RGGGED CLEORING LIMITS SN4'�L DE PERM:TTE.^.. iNE FLAGGING � FF 219t (MATCH EXISTING ` " ' � SMA�I.BE M4ZNT42NEC BT"iF!E APPLIGONT.,.pNTR4CTOR FpR 7ME " 'J�,1RatION CF CONSTRU.TIpN. T� T W ff _ i . E F2�ER�LgR_C�Na��eE JR:.NGSEC It�G GC4'� J�4 �.._'_�' � . . . � �' -.. . -� ' .._�.-.. `' , .�f'F ` �:�� E. GON7J CTICN Zgs��G�E4RING NDYGRSDTNGE COSVI�EADND SM1 1G TV+E L��5 uE BnRRIER TC a JOIC USE OF IGI T5. a E�� J O ' ._ . . .- . - ICMTS G GRr,F2� R CLG?�SHGL_6E SP'�ICE✓1 GE'HEF �Q� . ��E!lTATION FB�CE�T7P7C4_ ..-._ __-. _� - :.� - 81Ll1 DA1�t,TfTIG+1L . ONLT 4T G Sil°�'ORT FC�i.bl.iH G MI\IMJM 6-INCH OVERLAP.AM1r � $ff DETAA 51�T G-4. - - ._ _ .. S�"L�IdIl.LI�T G-4. ., . . ' BCTN ETi.^.5 SEC+.RELT FaS�ENED rJ itiE f'05T.:JR O��ER�nP.'r. �U� � '� SUCH d M4NNER AS f0:NSJRE THdT SEGIMENt GNC SECIMENT-L6pE4 PC5T5 dNC`GT GC!:GS SHCNN GN CJET��. � � LLl .. � --� _- ' . ,. e`PP�:ABi.E�a RS t.xNpOR�6GE 5'S'EV Rc`G NAi 5,',J4 VIOLGTE �i _� ...' _. :.. _.- `- -. . -..- .?JTLE?STRUC*uRE R..:iNSTRJG.�4�ERI C�1.�ESE ESGSIyE±`OT: ti5M aRI�G TME as ' . . - - 4^.!22v. �.. c i�g ESC F6GSL'i'EC ^ l �IE `r..��_CE JP RnpEL` / �N�I�91M OF 8�GNES�RE GND D2:VEN 9EGJ4ELYLTTO Tr�CrRCJV= ' �� _ _„ O � �I � � . __ - __ - . . . _ a�r�av tN P �...Qe �!.r.n.+ � (�/ I ��TE GRADING LEGEND uee��Fcrz uti�c�E.,sraxM e+�v�s..�_ �;s�r�r�ar seo:*�r:r .�F reR F.�ea-�s�«�«avE a r�x*�zrnuM vEn.xce�a�rz:F�=c s W N� il- ER e�^-S6GPAENT-�6CEN::4TER D^N -�E:./E TNE SITE. Pv ES 4ti e/.,GV6TE.:�M4TERIS�FROM P'._TER FrBRTC GE�CE �N� � = I, � � EROSION CONTROL PLAN _ .�, .o,5��_�e;,�,�:,�m�.,��d�,�o.�,�--E � c%ISnNG CONTJUP._INE E1SSL dE1 �_ .-+. '.�E E5:cqCi2T2ES 5!+aLL BE INS�•ED.�:_t'E*THE E E �n.�gEG<REc <°°�$,,,ANT r,q.��G,:TCM AND M6MTdIYED<5 NEGESSbRT TO IA5:1RE <. : � R✓OR r+EG JY QfrY FILTER FGBRI.^.FENGE SMFLL�d/E - �I ��' -- � � C4iCN B>SIN TH�'R,�OtJTiryJE��WCTIONING. yG �cLCi�S�Ct��ppp5 Fpp�X 7 P'.�ST:ry$t6._Li:C'�. DAR� I-20- a �_ .._- � -'�_..NEV.CONrWR�_ru� ,� • M,�YH�.� _.. m 20 a0 H 99 '�y .. iHE FSC FACILITgS Cti ZNPCTIVE SITES SNALL 6E PuSPECTED dNG STIP.^,��OOPS SHGLL BE 2NSTGLLEp pN THE Jr HZL.L SIDE C '-E � �7. ��' '�� '�'i�.li'I FOLE Ir.62T'�14Il�m A MINIMJM GF CNGE L MONTM OR LII1�+4r TNE 7�HOURS $LOPEC GREL. E%1571NG SGOT ELEVATION A� �OLiOI:IkG 6 S�OFM EdEN*. cPO,[CT�+G 98171 FIRE H iGRANT SELIMENT 6E<LLO�.IED TO 5. FI:.TR2 F<9R2:FE4GE,5 y��,,: p�QEyOVED NHEN�NE'/MA'/E SE4/E� METER I GCGiMJ�GTES�.iITH^.M G�'ERGrPEp CdTCHTD SD:. G�L GFTCN p65IN5 GhD TME'R`15E��q1R�C�"E.BUt�1CT BETOR@ tr1E UP5`pPE 4REA F.ri_EE� �_i H � I`.s`� NEW$POT EIEVATION ��I � 'oROTE=TEJ G"L ST4C'.:._ZED. ^ � PROVIDE STqKE. SEE SPEC'S �.l � un�T'v�ULt COnvEraKE�;hES 5�+=:.�DE G:.EGtiEL ARIOR TO�aVP�0.S. ��T`� " I .J a TRANSFORMER ANO PAD THE GLE4h:*i.rs�y^ERG?ION Syp�y NCT F_�5ti SEpI�EIVt-�,p�ry o EL ELEVATION tuaTER'J.TO TME DO:JNSTRE6N SYSIEM. �rER F4BRIG%EN��''S�..='" __'\_=r_`'_:�E---4_-�=�___ ' 6.4. BENCM MARK � � JaL'/E BOM COYER - �v -�.ry��qp�rpq^.. . -_ - �- T.O.C. TOP OF CURB =o ��-� .. STdB L'Ev:�RdJE�ENTRaNC6 Si+Gi.L CE IKST6�LEO LT THE '�ElS GP.. .,JJc ti ?RG_ \ " G.'� __ _` � _fE:c_ .:.4_ /.� ^ 'i �� IGHT POLE BEGI\'.'N OF GC.M�SiRUCTION tryp M4INTAINED FOR TFIE DuR6*ION OF 5�....�BE va�-�EpI6?E� ! i � � B.O.C. BOT'ON OG CURB -O; �� Wq��MOUNTED Up1T i;{pR KL PDC2.^.CNAL MEd5JRE5 MG1 6E REdiIRED TO SNSURE `/ � - �I T-lar p�� P4JED G4E45 aRE KEPT CLEGV FpF T�E p1:RLRON O�THE M.H. MANHOLE C.9. CATCN BA9N 1' � FIRE DEPARTMENT CONNECTION ��E a I i�-- I� °,�; e � ,S FL� � �� GRQRib FlEVGrLON • -. SEE GRADIN�ry,qN A G � ,A� �eB �.RNpSGAPE ARE4 � . I HEW tOPSOtL LANO$�APE/JiEA cuei c �4�( .�( 0 I � Fiq pgt NEW TOP J.'� & �'i' I. �� 'S<.F�r 7�'AQN.ZONE �•• ??`� 57/a1CN2Gl 5'-0'U.N.O. L �� OF ORhIN ROCK �R t:,gp P4LN5 I AOPE 4f.(MAk) _-/ ERPIRES�. ..'71/OG gf8 ' REINFORCEh£NT PER � ."1 - • • • ` _ REVISIONS FILTEI! 4 X�ya STR11GTURdL PL4N5 �f-� -r fA�RIG I I ' . dO� �'� ll. .I= \ GONC�TE SLAB PEFi '��.,('� � �pY e�� L�i ��OUiL.ET�P2PE srnucnra.a�.rt.nrs �'�a� e—J Y � 1 �a"Of COMPAC7E0 � � � PLAN �:. �� F �RUSMED ROCN BASE � ��-��' ,. STLImnRD cRAME �:3a g'^y � i 4 . ��5'J9GRnpE � Afm Q2ATE 4'DIA.PERFORATED ORAIN .. . LINE. DQT INtO SiORM DRAA STSTEM-W NOT � Y:> � � MN(30' CONNECi t0 ROOF DRGINS. I• MLI Im' •. �. -_aN�SLnF�4REa P T3.9 �� ._'I��.`-'�'�._. - F�TIIrGPER NEw �'OaSp; �. STRUC1LRdL PLaNS 5'-0"U.N G. �4LE BOITOM o�� TOOLED b'OJtLET PIPE .• SLJPEI7C(MAX) �E�GE B'-0' S�� 6'-OY �� 6��TPAE� �� Four�anoN �n� t�rAU. . M�, ' i �,-� ;� � • • 'I I ' a:- se�,. . . �a.b � I I' ff ri.s � is, .� l E W I 5 & � �II :.' R . 05. Ff 32GID 7% II � H4NDRAII. '�, i \�\� �� ' DR?1-IINGS �I 9lAr 91MP I c i � 8 \ � �\: rv,� 4'OF COMPACTE� � � s I :1�a'�.q' G' ��.i a i ��'' '� CRUSHE�ROCK BASE �� •J <�,\. � 1]2.1 7320 �� \COMVACTED SUBCRADE 6• FAGE OF BuILDING 3=y1% � g5 pqy�G --{ S�, � --I Y�,,�, e�— . • G1ION ASPHALTC PAVING AND B�SE ROCN SEGTION A-A SEGTION B-B �'� SEE SITE PLAN FOR DEP1H VAN VLEET ASPMALTIC PANNG AND BASE ROCK NOTES: 1. YWE ALL WALKS 21C(M�%)AWAY FROA1 BUILD�NC(S)U.N.O. g�NT P4n0 4REd-, g, 6, SEE SITE PLAN WALNS APART FRpA BUILDING(5)S�OPE TO ONE SIDE. aREn n=h DI�CONStR1JG7IpJ I41 4CCpRp,qNGE iJn'H lSTM C-4�B CON�IJLTINO ]IG.'16 RIM 116.5 EN�INEEAB NIN NIN 2. PROViDE NEA7LY TOOl.EO CONTROI JpNTS�T 5'-0'ON CENr[R. ��`� b�RET��'�'� B'OF'�I("GOFIP4CT£p 645E M4TERIAL W 31�.0 6'HIGN E%iRUDEO CONCRE�E WRB �. PRO`nDE E%P�N90N.qINTS�T JO'-0'ON CENrR �PEC351: MMDAM 414LL THICKNE55 TO EE 5' REINFORCEI.&'N�to�E ROAR MEETING ASTM AiiS 18660 �w boone�t�rty rooG SE M EPDXV. PRONDE.l0�Ni5 AT qN�PT WA�IC INiERSECTIONS. GReDE b0 aR uELDED L�IItE MEETIHG 45TM bt91 tualaSin,or On 87062 . ]0'-0"ON CENTER MAXIMUM. . �'� 2Q pCTRUDED CURB DETQI�. � �� SIDEWALK DET�4IL l `+ 1 EPITRY DETASI. 5 I�IATER QUAI.ITI' SI�IALE OU71.ET (503)eas—°8aos pno�. i r4-= i� �3 rr,� �� (503)Ba5-1206 fox G-4 I/4`=I'-m' U-5 Ii7--r'�-0 I ! � 2�THICK,30000 P.5.1.GRnY IRON, ,� E HEAW�VTY CAST IRON GRATE. _S ' ,.; I o0' y.- %"�N�S•� �f �Q DGG � RIM F1EYA710N ' � �� „� ,y� SEE PLAN ��n�� °<Es�` h . . � `� '`a�°'8�p � i�s�r sour�� - .�� `r ' Fu,r max f IPE IN�ERT f�i�� '� sEe PuN '�y " RIM P1.NaTtoW �� ^ m 3 ' - zK rlaN RapM-a'reSN. - ,-� v G1F.AN PST IiRi OR H'��.t�� N\ — CIEANWT P UG4' ��,/�,�} � _ _�, � �i- � ��, �,,�� .�� z.- 4�G�5/EGRE55 dRE3 NO?E5: �,_. �5�R4N OA TMAP IJjTM 4' A-CATp1 BA9N TO'�'CIXJSTqUC1ED Oi 10 GAUGE(MINIMUM 57[EL '� (�6NqJT pL11C NIRI FLL.MINT$NE�pEO. CATCM BASIN CAN 8E RpJND�SIXIARE. ��1 GR�4YEL CON57RUGTIDN ENTRANGE B-CPLK PIPE TO CA�<INC NUB. aNCLE COTH ENDS OF FILTER FA�R2G C-SET CATCM Bn51N ON 6'T1ICK COA'PnCTED CRUSNEC T �G'4 ST�1 ��ro assurse soa ss rw�� _ r.., oxo-am i,3=F'-m RaK oa suao e�se ~� c�e�iewNo � 0-BACKFIIL AROUNG::ATCN BAJN'MiH COMPACTED CRU��iED ROCK. ��A� ti E-ORILL(J)1'OiA.HOLES iN rOP CF BASIN EACN SiDE. ��o��r.r Pos,s � � Q CAtGH BASIN DETAIL e 11 AREA DRAIN DETA7J.. 4ND ATiAGH —_— - crv-ce iis _i m° u-n r=r-m^ � � 70P VIEW I �:'. � �MANHOLE FRAME AN�COVER � I I I Furerz FAeRxc Mar�txzc� �'� �� ■• /36"WIDE ROL15 ' GROUT � »t'�- FINISH GRADE__ 4'PRECAST CONCREiE � � . � (SEE PI.AN) EXIENSION PoNCS. � � ��. �_ i (]�RINGS MAXIMUM OR p CT y� AI � 12 E%TENS�ON MA%IAIUTA. I � � � � GURLJ INLL I GA I CH BL�SII`� EC ENIRIC MANHOLE T0� �/\ � NT5 �„� � H � - �: 1. PRECAST MANMOIE SECTION$ � �. .... .:'/�'. ......'/:/..�..'/-. i�i STAN04R�N.H.$TEPS TO CONFORM i0 ASTM C-17B O �' ��,., i. :, . i� . . �, 2. A:.L VOUREO IN PLACE CONCRE�E SMALL HAYE A 2B�AY SIRENG'w � 6'MdM1.41M SPqC2NG OF J,000 P.S.L AND 2"TO 4'S�.'.JN? � 4 � e 3. ALL JqNTS TO BE RAM-NEK�O�h'- �ry � a. PIPE RMOIE�LOCnTI0N5<ND 512E5<.� 1 1 1 W� � '`FRONT VIEW f' F�a+ � PER PLANS. 9'N!N.BETKEEN H p'_ES ��Z ^ � �—� 6�1 f3R oR��PO5T5, STAt�nRD Op p6TTQt OR EOJA�4LTERN6iE 3T�- � —cRECAST REINFORCEC !!11 �PO�+T•+ 60� TpNGUE AND CHOOvF �J w - PLdN M�NHO�[5ecnws Q� SIITCMED LqxS TO CE TONWE AND GROOVE JGiN' �2 � iEE STITGHED LOOrS � s�me�s�i..o�� ov�x r x s•ros,s 3� {-- 2` � � � 3/4'DIA.G�lVAN2ED'.AGV �� mf �� t' I., STEPS 8�DEEP 12'K+�E W 4 �---� � � vn1H 2'DROP. ENBEDDEU �� _ ^ y1RT�OTiqA pp /� DRCN 607tOM 6' S 1 ]" J'AT 12'O.C.TMIG.� u' N F2L.TlW MdiERIAL a � �� /�o PWRED CONCRE?E a<SE Y IN B'6Y b'TRENCN �-� (�' U • (5)SACK MIX P . . . ., . .. . 2500 p�i�T 28'_<v5 COPIPACT All AIiFAS OF I �.\� r ~.. ' � D�LE: 1-']Pi-99 �''r�a F°°rsxc n�e" '`��`i SEGTION A-A �� a c, e'canv�cho � e pp °o-° p0 c^ °�c -4��mn��e.se � � DI7''� NLET � � :Q ��.�_�� -ti�� PRO��r ti�� ,� SIDE VIEW T n , _, ��o __ �E�,wo n.5 • �61 SEDIMENTATION F�1GE S�INLET B�RRIER (BIO—BAGS) �m 60" DIAMETER MANHOI..E C � _ ERG-SED� �;7=Y /' ErzC-66 3.�4'e i'�" � U-9 •,3'_'� � `_..----- —-- °v �� 1 ��' , I =r.��a , . -�,; ,..,b-`��'---`� .;i '. �•, , � . ; � ; � (i �� , I�I . '�. ,i ' � � `I - __ I �j � ,.�: � �� 1!_: � , ; __ _ . , , � - ., ; �} r �i . ;, ; w � , , � - - - ,i , - -- -- � `\?�,, ' \ \ . ; :� ; �� , . ,� �!� � � � � � ,� _. �� '' '• ''�?.4.. l 'I i � aitr � - ° I , O, �� I ; i' i 4 - , . . ' i ' ' �: � i ' j �� _ _ . . . ._ . . � i ' .. . � � , � { , ,. !,�. / iI ' ', •f. - i i I,` • I �'` / �, / i �^ �F� j i � i . .��`\*.`' , i� i y I . . • . .. � � , I I . .. . • I . . A�� V � � � �. !__ . I ., � _ ___.._._.____ i .. . .. .. . . .. _ ._ - . � � I i �� _- --`_ _. .. ._ .. . _ ___- . . ,.j I ' � , �• � ' • I . `.. I I ; I� � I�� '' I � � �' � __ _ �- i ;. -_ ..._.._ _- i,f�,. _ , :� _ � � I�I � ; _ � � ; ,� ,. .- • i _ ._ � _ �\ ;jl r _1 t • � . I��i �; � ' � � � !{� ;; - -_- !I ��Q �` IIjI �.� , II I 1 � • � � �!I ._ . �;, �� ,�� — -•:•-� I � li ----.._i--------- -- ... �i�� ; ,.. . i I� � � , � , .;S �,I,� �, . i �� , � ;; � I , i � ;_ . .�. �'I � I '��. I li i i I _ I i � i; � . i r' ��, � � . - I j'�` � ,I I ~ �j �/� I 1I, - . c I t I {' \ Z �'� � 'a�'q.-t �' '• I. . i ' , i _ � � r} . (.-y� � � I I I �f� � � 1�� ,f �� -- �� i'A �� . � � ''� " � 1 ..� '4T . I �i �'� � � a I,ii pY ,�, ; �; • , — -+- ; ' � i i � � '�, �; � ' I�I� � �� i i;� � I � , ;� , � g , ,� �� _ � � , � � � �' :I I � 1 � i r - ii'I �•; . �' ` ,r� %° ' . ''�� ; � �� i �;�'z�,��'f' �o�`` j .� ,� . ijl� I _ :.a.� Li.�4'' f' �-,`�»'_ . ' / ' � � - ,I� �I � � ) �4 �'^ /� i !� �.�i I � F �'I I I �: U :i' G� '�_` �' �/ I .i ! � I i I � � '.-,_"1 n, � " i !I i ?f �; �-. � ' _�� , �� `� ' � . � _._. -�..,�,_� _ I i � '� ° - 4 "`,,° � � i i ! _ ; �. � - - � � � I �.-'��" � a��i . I�! i . . '. � i l A: � �; � . . ' � � I 1 < 1 TEMPLE P AN - . ' AVI PRADHAN ARCHITECT � 911 S.W.MORR[SON #115 I�-� BRAMHA;PR�EMANAN�DA PORTLAND,OR4�2os TEMPLE/ ASHRAM �- 1i515 S.W.HALL BLVD.7'IGARD,OR.97223 � nu�i i L..�r ^i -�'.136G .:'.yoiT�2I-SN. • ., �::j�;r �-��;;�. .-:;,,, ,. � � . � , , ,,,, . — . 4W A L.- _ _A1GIS. � ��-txTi IGl�W�4..4xhlao 4�. y... ��o�. 7 Wa w� -- �a°.��raa�ei.w��•dxf•a��a��.o~T�� .�u.r� � - • • - - ! .s. e .~1 �!o5k� 1 �!d's ,;I � _ �,�. R � , �—_"�a��r—ir•'—'�- `\ � � .5 � = A g ._` - � � ' c - P - � Y i � � :•- � r . � � � , � .� � i j � - . � L a •.' � . • Q , . 1-'� �� 3 `''� � � ii J ¢�� ' _�z� I ` a 2 S �o`"' ` : ��'� 1 ' � ! ' i`'' � 3 ., �;� � - � � --- - --- 'L- � +, � - 1� Qa A�s� ,� � --- - - i = - - .w � � � ' - -�11 � g� ' p ~ }� � �. • � �� .Q ° I I 6 i I _ �:,� f _ °� �q1 L '4'.s� _ o�l�l' I�Y= �x ' �Y� �1 q•� F ; 1 i` , �1 J �'� + r �- I � , �M�'�"' " ' 1 i Z �� =�_ _ —��i �_ � �' i3 � { . .. �'+ :�c.c�s oee Y • I "� �, P C I I _. _ i _ y lwo.o.cwvw tv % - -I �r' I I I ',�n �� Sj �� t I ,.s , , , . _ �� 1 � _ � . ,� o: • � �,�' ,<< ' -,�, a- -L i .._ • � . � � - � . � _ . � -- �� + �� ° ,' � � , � � — -- ----- - � � a_ �s � � � h� 'mHC��oai 'e�� f`— �� s �i � � �. -- - � �'! � ��.� �F'x � �h . � � '�'��' ,s; ��;'�°w`x''z""4 r ' , 1 .�� c� � u`M�:m��.',`..�K—�"'�R_ �� , � �(' . � - �� I � ' �� A � 'r� r �� — � �� .,� y�' 'y, � 5..1� � _:. { '�� . �L � ) X.� 1 � � �'I � 1 a !) � 4=,1 Y {� �r C'S� �Y �: �I. .1 x� ,%:_ ^f � � � }' ��L - ' r �1 �� '! , � ��1 �� 11��l� .�� F _�� r ++�'t� i t f,If; p =- T r� �. � •a y � I :. �E /},1 �y �. }t { l �y . yf ,� x + 1 ..b � ��.� i:. � °f'�`, y.,�� . }�' crY .� � h . :_ �. � � ' -Y'� - t; �� '_S j '_'k> �u.t�a t r,`��c ,y i*.: <„��.-i . ` � �I , { x � 1 :t� . r� . ;., �: �� . ' I i��.1 y�'� r r �7 i T i,Gf'r r�°�e > .�i �; �. y � � �� ; n � '�`� � � ��.' � �� p .r.: .f�i rv �.Q � ��..G _�' �n��w -�=».t..(w.w» ;w �--��...�n ....�r'" �..�n.�. . � 1 �.L• � r'" �, r � u �' '�.� r ,'s � �i �� i .. ��t ro Y1 fsE �' � . , {� � , � :t ~ � �r ^Fc, �}� '` ` � � � � t �r S A�.,r j - 1; ` '3' . �. i ; .�i: � .. - �' I � t.. �F � a � t:.� l��i! O �, ! � i.� � n ` ' � � C7 � , , r �,»...:;�� ;'_�.: y. �_ , -; � � f ti: > . ,� x. ; o � ----- �, , �� 4 , � � '� m,t Y' � f , 'K • � { .��i�'�T7d�1t � '� �.. ..v if J+,.w i : � �� .i � x� � 1 � �� ;'� � 'i �� : �� ` r �! .-. �., \ y � , -t � � � 1 . t� �f k .�� [rr = ' a+ 0.�,� y�,�..�� ,. ' I 01 ! � ;� � 5 � �� : � _ i:.F t � �i;"f�i�:. � ��° f ' i � �� , _ _ d e t " 9r. � t y� �t r �. P��. �� i-r ,�,�.�.-� r i��r 7rr,rr<t r r�.fr a r � ..t �H w d� r r �� _ .MlO`i � r -�_:. � I. , . ..: . . 4 �° 1 � ', - i.�. R�. / � .. M I p QQ �y ,}'75 : D� � i� �I r�� '7 {l-"` `�+�N' S i� }�? y •' �r � T��C�,�t�'��t t j �tr{ t-S"E�'. � f. � � � x_ � ��"i tt 1 �L-d,b�r' i. � T x� l-.: O � . .... � Y-�_ I.J.w t '�t v';4�=N t ��iA• I , � �--�- �� ? � �{''�.) �'Y�'�� "„'�`��,,'✓ c G �.� C� � �;�h� �' _., :� -- • .�.� •:, c� ti,. ��:"'1 r•� �' p �y r..:�:, („T � 4. P"� L� :7� '� �..��'1 �-��..'� �`� ['.'�, ' •t..-{` �:� ' .�i.,«J 1'� _ :'t � .`f.';�'� (4�� ,,� :p ,y . -'�� j,�� ADDITION TO THE EXISTING BUILDING FOR, AVI PRADHAN ARCHITECf N BRAHMA PREMANAHQA A�HRAM TEMPLE 'Z,S'".�RR,S°"*„' � PORTLAND,OR 97205 11515 S.W.HALL BLVD. TIGARD, OR 97223 I , , � '` X 1� � i.v/� �1 j `i�w � � ' �...MIL-._.. _- . _ _ . � _ - , �� - ' ..-1�1RL11/i��0.�.. � .,'� '.-_ ". _ ' .-A' `��'� � �� _��_ ` _ _� ��__� � F - �:' � O O � � � . - .� 1� .M q . '�� ; _ -- � .-_. ` .-� . .. i�_ - C N € •�- _ � .�� r �� ; � ' . � � � = �� S Z � � � � ��- _ •(� - �` ' 4 � � 1 �� ,� �■ '� X+ . �� ' �� ' � � V i I t � ,�, O Q = � � ts _ 2 Ey l - � r b � , w ii 7 . • i aA � . ... c _ fi .- Q -=-- � � -. !O � ' \ �� i�- �� pr . RmF 4�wi I.w� . � ' � M. f - -�� 7. _—w.�yr.bs•A+. � { � � , � � -- _ _ " _ � -J � • " ' �'� �. :! . � i � �•T �:L A,�.1, ' � 1- � M r!1' . � �_s b. _ I - 'C'Sed ! - 1 t � I i �- f. _�_ � .t � _ ___ . - - _ y � `. • �' > ' � - s�n " � 1 �. �. y�r�{:�"�:w. � �= j Z . :I . . � F / 3 � _ _ _ _ . R � '/ 41 �' , . ` ' , b,.., 1- �0 = � /.� '_ ' c i i _ _ �wwe iu�� -_ a � Ff/' ,d• � - _ - - - - ' . � . .. , 6 ' , .,, * , . _.� �.� _. , �+ e� , � , � «�,.� r . � _ �_� + -- �_A � � r '� �� q�r Y i k h'i ss j pr i ] �,, �,.,{,x � � ..." r e r'� �a Y�'�:. 1� ��'b 3 f �. > j� � I '+{� � � u 1��2,u$ �`�i�,. .c,. n.s%di�� 5 � Y'�.b'} f'�� )yn., . . � LL 1S f �. '1`''��".�'"i �.-�•_ t Z`.r s� n.-:..��y, { .rri . - � . , . � _ > .tl,l�l� . �C x s �y iM� ; �..�, � (� S ' �� i x'� � +a 4�rwP'" ,H+,�r ir�� a�y7� � \ �y ' � , »s � �� ,.- �. .. 7 z cr; itJ c�f'' �.�'i�#`, t � \ r G � 4� �' t �E g �-^ 'p } ' t r x +i..,r Y Ns' � ��A�i �� \ a ,{��Nx��r! 4 �' ..� '�i),cu' �i.�'1'�� `t,✓ � n' ��S`�`��'k�-.��.�'ys�it�e[;�,��F �. . _ , ' •c � \ t J 4 y . 4 Ts F! -."��,f ffi �'vK2 �..aI�J�Y '� .4�{yJrb�� t . � � fi i � 4 r. . i ,y�� 3 �j` 7 rl 1. ' L ' ��' 1 ,:r,� 's'.: ,� t _ . '� .�-t' i .,�#�si'SdQi : — ----^___-------� .. , . .. `7y,�feg.. �� ^ � v� I -n� I � 0 � ' � � I � � O � C� OOOOUC� OOO �� OO �!��OO 00 � ~ � � � o � � o 0 0 0 0 � o a o � ,- r' � � � � — � �� ^ V I J �} J Z N 7 11�� 3�J W i t)7 1��1 O� �a N Vl Q N� J� p .7�1, J p� E �� 5 � � Q �� S 5 � � � . K°� x'� x•.Y` +�^ x p n x � �" �" .^ n� x� � x`� ,r; '4 �c i °� D ^ � � z = a # G � fl f � � � �� X�0 � x d b x�0 Xo0 £ x•� X°0 �� E v 0 01 � oD y�i r p �E f x � K�; .r� � � ? j � � * � +� � � � � � � r � � � O �� - 00 xC. ) � 0� dD Y <�0 = � � -a � , � � � � J � 1 E ETil E p� � E 7 E)a � -1�p f i � E► �* s€x � '� < +,t � -►S �< 3 a� �S L 4 P3 811 * °�� p r Q -�� a o �7� pl r ¢ )r S� �- ±_< �- � < �S �< }� 0 - � 8� a'� L� �� w2 '� ��-f�� a� � �� p�} �� _�r �� Lr � =Z Z � _� �� _ _� �}� �z z= � _� _� � � : �_� z � • � �� `► r � i � ..I �� zt � �� r r �� E' � �� z = �i' '- O � 6 ;o�zo o �� o€�6� i �� 0� il T0� j � p f � z �r �r � s � � � � !� L � � > � j i �L �L � � � � � �. �1 � � � ) � n :� ��`*�j � � � � t ? � = z i = Z z i � � � � z { � o� • Z : � � � _ � � �. �� L% �� p Yo �S �1 'i I � 0 � � � � � �i � D � ,� � 0 .j � i O D 0 � 0 Q ' � 0 � ��' � � . , � S iK . � L t� � Z �� ; � � a � o � D � o 0 0 � � D ^ � � v d � 6 � � 5'�= ��`o � '� � N E £ � � � � 3 -� � � � � � � � i � � � � � � � � �° �,,, _�; � , s�� X +� _ �i z n A II o � � a, � ��1 M p ', �� i7 ;� •7 �xb� a � �C- � � pM � �� r� s�� 11 a . X ' � � . 4 p o00 - 0 0 • � � !zp �.�1 �� z� �' -�'M- --� 0� ,� -� �� • � � � � � 7 > Z• �� #� �D �3 !„�� + � � a �_ � �� ;p a �� '�a 3� -� 3� a a �� i =< � � � �r � 0 i �wi a�a �'° �'° xo 6 ° 171 � �� £ � D 8 � �o � =i �� ; � o; . p. � . � . � � �� . i� � � F 3 4 � � Z �� ! f�,�_� � s �� ky � �. � � �� _ . ! � �b%3 6�8� ° � ��$� � � 1"' �: � �� m0 �m�0� �� n� ;�� ;� m . � _ ;� ;ri � + 4 �1 V� `�1� Ni� v: � d �' d� e '� � P d - �� ap �. ! t � �! x�� •�� p �� f � �� X �� ^ �� y�) � �p � x=0 � y'D % � •� � i 0 x• 'f •� x'� � �� 0 0 �� '0 6 - • _0 � C •►i i�� — � � • ' �af� �� o -r � Q � f�'s � �' ►w � q� a ! � ET�r E . E*� r � �� _ �i3 ai'� � �� '� �� 'b� _.� s�� j� _ �� n! '� �o � ;o � v� = 1 o t°�E; � •°� �E b a� o =o Lo� =�t� ' � � ,Z � �i � i � �i � �f � � ' � ? � �L ► � � � � � � i a J -=1 � i i � � � i ,-z� • � � � � � � I D o v � p a v � �i o � v D � a a � � i o � o � � .^ "j � t;;,1t'`A 1 ` �t �Z �i � � i � � � � � � i � � � � � � � � � t�.;; �� `':�ti � .-1 + � .-=i � � � � � � � � � � � � � � ± � � � � f ;� r-, r �-:'�i . • �J C' ' : " g � �� " �� , � , � � � �� , �� ; �, [ ,� •--...�.� �� c7 i a j � � a =� � � 't �:� � � � �� i' 0 a �� : �J� �"' '. ,..o n 8 �� s � �� }p� �� x � -� � � �q �� s � �µ " �� r' �' �'�' � � k i �� 7 � 7 � � �r '� � .� 7 " R ; y' �� f', rrr .�. •r r � i �9 • � � . � � - � � � D� �. -'r. ��! -C- ��° � � N'�_ 'T .,f ,i: :J ��. { ApDIT10N_TQ THE EXISTING @�11LD�NG FO�i AVI PRADHAN ARCHITECT �RAHMA P_REMANANDA ASHRAM-T_EMPLE 921SW.MORRISONN413 � roirruNn,ae mzos , 11515 S.W.HALL BLVD. TIGARD, OR 97223 . . `+ I ! i i � � ' — - '��r -- + - -------------- _ _ � -- _.�..•- ,I;��I, �►•.' '� �: _ - - � — � 3I I ' � i i ' ; ~ � — -- 'r' � - — -- „ , � _.. _ __-- — - y ± I� - I 1 1 � � �ry � �i � ' ��'z� � - �� '�', � ! � � � ."�`� ' ,:, � '� � �' �� ' , � � � �.� � � � �� ,� � i � -1 ! _ i-- • - � �� . ; . �� r. , �,: �' j ` rn ;i ' , _ _ ,. �� I } _ � r,` '' . � � - - � '.R� _,` ;� y ! j § . � i _ ,. � il � I _ . � `�, � ' ' C i � . T � t � � ,� �\ t I� 3 ; i� � - - \`\ � 1 � � } � - � �`'.� � � � i I r � � � � � r , i� � _ " j -�, � E � . .r�, � � � �� L>�, � i �I I.� � I 1 f , � 1i . { .,. r � O i �� t � jA � �• ! i � � ; y/ � � . Y. ! � � - P s � ,j'P' i Z �� , � i O � ! i; �--- , --- --- --- .......__ C � i� il� !�� b _ �� ' � � _. _. � � i `; �,� .;�4' ; � _ r ,� � , T ;I �i; .�� , � �� • � o- � . i I p �.!� -- I s � ' f� * �j� � i � i j i �� Y-`- i I �A`� ' rn ' , �� ' � _ ; . ; !�� ; � +: , - -�_�.�' � r � , ; ��, � .�,�� — �, � � T x� --'-- —.—_ = O � ---- -_...-- -- � ' I i '' : n.; N s. ��, ; C ; .� .� ;� � 1 , . ��_ � ; • �; � i ,� �� . ,'�� __ . ._ , �, � � i- _ - -- — �±��,�1{�� i � �o` i i �� } I t1��1��'�'�t = � � � � .�� 1 1 �lx � � � ��( . - „ �{ �, . ,I �,: �,�� ' — � I � � I • �i �:'fi '� t '� �� . I r i �. � 1` � �� I' j 1 E HI'��t�t . I p � �� . , _ - � r�.a•-�� °�{. � �. � 'I� `f'�A�jch�r sZ �. i • �' I '+'�- � I II��II �_ .`}; �� .� I * ' . ��- // � �..14- . I .�� a . ��! Z � ; i ' � ��. � , � . � , �;�� '}rI � ��'� ' - I � '��; � �� _- - � �� _ � � � ! : ��• �i�'; I'}}} I 1;�� S � . � i -�.i-�" -� 4.i. .� � i�� /�/ � I �L� }� �.. . . . � � __ �, ' i � cY` . 1 ' � � i , F ! l �� y. P z�: I { � � 1i � ;� a � ,by; - � � : � I �� ;id ,,,,� f � 1�, � i �~'' '�� _ I �� ,4-3 t . � t I� ;. Z � � �� ;��t�,�,.�r.;� � � � i� .�;� � i „_ � i �� ; � +:o' � - -- - - - - - S;�� '�. � ��i��:r � � � i � i, ,�^ .. w� • k.t,i��t, �---�--...��..._. .�,,. .�. , �y§` _. m = -;{> �i �° ! � �'' ;, `'� �,,;,� �, �, ' �- r � '•- C � }f -i}'Y�i .ii i � 1 �� Z f � ..I! � � I 1 a � _ - -=- - _ - - � , . �� _ - �.� , „r `�� r,:, ' ' � i .►.� _ ,�: � � � � i 1 ',,j�� ' I � � � � -�;4� - � --�� — � � � •y � - }� � ; � ' i ' + _ . _ ! O i �g� .�.t r , �' -- �-N�o` .a..QeM.x..r�e1. IboR I�.oaa.. � r :� i �; ; � s ; �----- _ � � , : ; �, Z �. --_ ---- - , �t-.-,T - � L � r a{ � �� _� ' 1 �I , � - � . . ^.ti�t tj � �r+ \ �� ` i _ �' �� , �k��'' � i� � � i {� f ,.. c�1fj`�� .. N T �'t+ ��t�, t � r' � i 1.� 1°1 ,�„ . � �{ ��„ � �{ �r r'� f . . , ,, . . ..� A �t'� A y _. _; � ..r' � t��'?� �vl �- .'; 'p,,�.� � 4r ��: �`"�� _ =-� :; f�., � � �� , r�-� ,: ; _.:� � -� . i i t....� � y, =� , �- . r`, �.-:' _ - _ �-� _ � ��;�� ._ _ •Y,' . • � � , . , � ., . . , , . - - -_ _ -� -- ; ; .. _ _ _-__. _. ._ .._ .. N . '- „1 i ADDITION TO THE EXISTINC.� BUILDING FOR Avr PriainxnN nxcH,TECr ; Vt BRAHMA PREMANANDA ASHRAM-TEMP_LE 92's`".'"°RR'S°"..,' PORTLAND,OR 97203 i - `�� 11515 S.W.HALL BLVD. TIGARD, OR 97223 , . . I � � \ � =t. . f,.,.'-�,;.. � _... . \ � � ; _ �.,,.., �--^'� • ,, �', I � � a� � ' � � • O O � � � ' i I � �' ' , � �;E ,� ., . , � � ;,., . __ -� � �- � � ,, �- __ ��, .,, � ,_. , �� - - - . J , '` I ---- v�'• -- V � ` � __ _ _ �� -, _ � , - -- -- . I ,� � . - I i _ . `�"�-� ", � ,�'�� - � �' � • � . , ,_ � � ,, ''�� \ , ^.:�• X , ` / ? �/�a� �-e� _ � ii � ; •r "�,; �� i y ' I ' I! i � — i � .. � . I� �� . .. . � . . ' 1 � : ,i �, , + I.i .. . t. s�' / j _ --- I � ��, , + .� / . t , .� � � �� j'` . �ic� i f � � I I ,`\\�� I � I .. . .. �� . � �� I I � .. • � . .. . - � - i . , �\�,, , � I I r.__ . � �---_�-----� i .. .. ... _ . ' . i . . I j i . �., _" '_....-'_.... .... � ... _ .. ..._ _.� . . ' ' ' . ' , .. , ' .'I I • f \ - .�. . , .. . � . . � •'. �--.' ' ; . � - ... � I � I1 I ii i i��,I __ . ._ .-- I ------'- --- ...�- . ��.� _ . . .. i � � � � � 'O � � � !� . .. . .i (�li I - Z I ji� !'� � I ' _ • i _ _ t _ _ ;,_�, �� ;I�. r � I � I i, i" fI �re I� � �a. i i I ,.' �` 'I�, '� I �, I Ij -- '!I . �: �'� . �� ,� _ I , �i I 'I i, � I I '+, , , I _—�_..._1_--- ---- . . . �I� ;,^ , i I; i , `� 'I; � �, j � "^ �,'� .�. � � i� � �; � I�� I li I .. I c:;� til � i, ' , vl, � I �� i I?I i - i�.. -� , ,� r' � . , i +� :� '�` � � I fi I � ' y1 �,i � :� .''1 I�� f7 , I �I 1 y {� � �� $-i ;� p�,�� -- �I��. ; � li x � y. i' � !i; I ''I i � � ';1. I ��' ' �I i I'� ..O //I i '' II�' I `I �I�� / � 1 . � .,,. I'�'_I I,' II�� i�I A i / � i�;,�� i{ �� l ' � � � •I � ' �� I�' �. �I ' [' � r � I��I' I i C + �'.�' r!;l�y /b// ,11 �i � I I� I II " r�'�, � � � �' ' �; � ,'r''ti. / ' i `� i ;1� i �� I I : � � e ,,' -'� .;.�^ � i � � � �, I � � _? �.. , . ^ ..�� T r. ,_p r �, � _ r..�� Si! , - I ; � .,�� .... _` , ,i ' � ��; ,' ' ... � ! ! � � I :M � I i ' �. ..._ �a ,r . �I �'' a. I . �_ . ' �`�,. ' , II I � � �� ,� : �^ ' � W i 1 T E M' P � E P � � N AV1 PRADHAN ARCHITECT -� 9Z1 S.W.MORR[SON #�415 N B R A M H A.,P R�E M A N A NiD A ',, pORTLAND;OR 972os � TEMPLE/ASHRA' M �= I1515 S.W,HALL BLVD.T'IGARD',OR.97223 � � , . , ' , • I . __.__ � �u�i,. t. „ f .�.•.��ie�.c --p�roti-tv. � ., ,�.-'°j y �,��,,T,., � �� . ,. .. � . � p�. � � ,i _- "i�/Y� AL._. -Af CK. � � ��..Rxn�1�oll�W�►u..a,w�oe s o� ��'oM. �/�uu�}ya r� wTO�y�T ♦�oN[ r""�� w� + �Yf«41a�.77i� � S K. 1'OINWL. �M�MRQ.TT 4L. Iu�NM� � ' � .�. o• � _ •1_�:oife 1 �!iYs - ,�I _ ._ _ .. . ,: ��—��—� � � _ ,�F- R � : _ ,,\ r [; �y = Q� 4 . ," � �� r . '� Q J � J� .� C� j F��' '_� �.. i J � -� , -F .• L, + �w ' � • • � � J � — S�'.0� il J 3 y�O . w i J ", i �� ►3- � z7Z. � . � : 8 E; . �� • �- ," _ � , •` . � ; �, .� _ --- — --- -- a ; ��s� � �:a .. i� , � ��_ --- �� _ � p � . � - ; -�,�� , ' �- ;��1 � • "o� �i'.a d..l' �y� � �I i�� _ :� I .- �i�� E•^ _ '�L ! I ; O I . , . ., . �� ; � J :e± _J� �� t� 7� � �� ' , � . �� j r1 ��p�-__ _ i' �� .�-..�_ 41n. �cc�_a:oee1�,�,, � � I 0�1��\ 1 ' � 0� P - C �I . '� wa wcK�+w -.-__�,.. s.�sS�.�r.-- _ I i v� � I � ,� � , V . - , " — . � �� (il� 3� � � S� �I - - ' � �� I s . , � � o. !�J► 7� a; o. , ij n 1f � r. sn.�ax. � 'I� • �i ; j , V — — - � �----- - ¢ -- ---- ---- --- I � +� _ � � G '... e z a � IIR �� t I � � _ i$ '' �� i�� t -=. '� � ; s � . �1 �', �� `��+a� /,tx - _� �-RfMOVi.[X1�77nN4 .� . • •'' . � � � �� •6..`iap��;�ic°.�MR. �,f � �. ,l r • 1 '��L�C� � � q: T'Riufowx+�. - . . �! _ �o i �i i " � �,; ;'.� a � � ' � . � _� I � � �� ..' �1- � .� " x�� t ��. ' '• � t'S� ' " 'r r:�� -�,k s -� ,� � .t :�Lr _ ! � .. �_�,l� { �, p r:�� r --: � �,�� . .. .,i�l'y .�. . — ' �� .a � � �"'�°r e+" 7. � - - -- �--� - — r f � r--- �',�.��^1..� fl � rf �� .. �� {�� R.� J(� � �� .,. t a {Im � � � - � �' � - — -- --'-� - - i�' '�� '� '�� p K � ,� f { v . ',� t'� � ' � w '' ,k"+'� r . ' w,•Vt a '��59 c.: +k fl �r- �.� .� ��,�� f ' � . -�'- - y;v Y( 4 i �it �Y 1�, ' wr �� I( ��h, � . ,� s��,,�Jy a ��,�� ,� ; ; �a � II� � �� '{�' T,ri��7e�'j' }.��rt��»'s�'k �y�S'lf "Y' G �°y4 ,� r � cS V� I I� r � . t �.�. � ��' _ � �;r7' ' i .� V . . .. . � � �# . . t� ..�, � y-M �a-y*t+r �'.nw c,�.M=. r�o,'. ' T,�-^�-., i-.dF �I ��: �j i ' a� '`f � 4S! � � 1.,� �� r : � � � � ��_ e- i �a �mx�T�* �s� , , , , si� . � q )i �'�, .��t. ktY .f "'�.r �� .fi.� � ' ■i x �' � j y,y �r �: � < r =- " � : , ; ,` �� . �,r ' ,. ;` :' I i `��.� a � a �F .,� ,� � , t, � � � �:: r .-}' 4 ,�. �� O p � �I . i.: xi�I 3r�...';� 'Y` t.� � -. . O L I � ----- �I ..- � � +F 1�r�'�<� �'r �, r`` . : r��q,., >� ' L� � � f� a �SF-�1xt f��! �� s..i �� i � �;� �� ,.,x�.«+��i,� � • �� r, � , +� � :�;_�. �� ` i F ( ��{��t"� f .� f 1 '� , 3 G '�l t' �, ,; , t� o c, � �� tc� ��, �` � � • �� x: t p Y��;�, 1 { ' I_� O� .5� '�`� J.� �;� �� i Y.{ J� ��.� � � {'.a.�rl'i f.p � � I �!� � r '" , � Y s , � :; . '.p'' � �7a h��M�� :. / irb,rj� Y .t S FIy, a�rf.' � � ' F�`� F�` .�, y�: r QJ I MLp� ,. 4 < <, s , -�. .� � .� �, , $ 4 .� I � � '" ' � � tr -:2�.�'7t :�T..1°r7 �i �� .� T �� ;'L�:'. � _ � v�� i.: ;,t- r r � ,.i �":_ �^ . O I' _ 4 � ��4^. � t ��-1.. �I V• S I�-� L�� ,,.:��,,. �S `� ��;��t� + �� ` ��> � L.. .i !'.N ('`"� �. ; ,,d,.1 �,:'.�ly� �, �,'�J�}�4 �r��a i� '�.. ('4-„_,} , (�y��.�,� . \^L N �;' �:.� � � � 'ADDITION TO THE EXISTING BUILDING FOR' nv�PR.a,nHnr, ARCHITECf N BRAHMA PREMANANQA ASHRAM-TEMPLE 921 SW.MORRISON N15 POATUND,OR 97203 11515 S.W.HALL BLVD. TIGARD, OR 97223 _ I . , , � , . . � x �; . �.� :1 � e��, i , I �++�poµa-— -- ' �..0 - - �_ - _Y1�e+L3.ua��e.r - � --- ------ — — — ----- — — -e.. \- �: � I � 0 0 -� � ,I . y: � i ' Oa � • __ 1 _ -,1 1� 1 . .,� . � I i�_ - � N �� " -- �j � �� ' ': A . � _ _ a � _ �� - z - �� _ �K � � :�� . 4 -- -� . � �• ' ,. ; x+ . � � . � i !s � +. ;� , � 0 �' _� sp� _ �e� � � p y 3 Q~ - - } �1- � - � r i • � �-i �� L _ A� J �� i�� ! ROCF LIN(AY�t O �� i =_ �F � - � --:..�.—�...-�..-.... �, � - — ' ^ � - - - - _J � I �. � n► � i 1� . �d •�T 4 ��-�r �� I ,- �, _ i I p. �- ( 1. V . ��l � � � 1 - . - ' ' i � + � � ... s�� `. � - . aLn 'S i. �� _ � M.a��... � I % Z � � '� - . " `�� ; � � � '� � ' . -�, • -I'� , ,, : . ,_ �o � ; , � _ • . , , _ � �u.w.w�u =_ • �' = �� .- � _ . . :... , , f � �: �� . _ � . . , . � • ;.. .+u�u„ts-. .__ - . _ � ,� n , 'µ � � � r � � !:� . i � �.I— .4;i rY A h..� N ��.r�, t�,V�.�'� ��,p�. ty�d."�Yr. k. ,f�.�;�: ti1 >� ,. Y 3'� �.a 1 �� i h.�ax v � � �y�� .:� x��-�.tR j �,�. 3 � � t'�.iSTFra:�is r+:�.: � � x. e�,l��'��''"�-.`k�".�' ` ,.,�.�t � x �.r��s:�`��z � ". � f 1 N i ; d '! 3q' 14r�`� 'Y-` y .� � � - > � �� -� . •- -s,r,e _ .a+`� �ody s �� :x,'- ��,y�� - �\ I d - � /I�\ :;J < = 4 .{�j 1„ L^� t 'L Y 1+i� yr.ia ;..�{J�^� ° '` " 7-2 a' ' sQ�� ► ` \\ ' � «,� F �y,��X,� ,ya t ��#!C �Yj'�'r��y„r n'� n��W's"r i,y,.4 4 .. 9 � ��i \\ �a ! d$mj..•�Y�.Y>,} A�.�Iw��Swyt{d�Ky}�' �"�"C"jF �^�� g � '� • i '.;��,: R i�t:t in`�'Ef�,..y,.k�(�t'�y�"��Yhr.'�' i=fA5 e �� :L�t�+ ^�t �l 'fu � . � �i';i+',.�'" 0.�F-"ti,L.�.. � .;:'4.,.rM .;:,�§ ,r,i�.. r,��..�rn�,,at� , �ti��^;.s�'�`+�:AA i -y � � .. . . . . . . , `,� I — . ----^---------- ' ... �'j � I v; I �� o I � ' � � � � �� - � � � � �� a � 3 � _ - - ��, --� , � � � g - � � o � o � 000aoa � ooa � ; � O � OOOOUC) 000 �� 0��000 � .,�� € x�e o� �i `�.�C °n i� a•! i'� '�� i^ °� do � � °��p i :Q 3 J d E �3 � � S � � �<_ S (f £ S < < � � . x x� x. +�. x n d• •� � � !` � P � �� n� 9 � � � � z = � 3 T Q 7 � i� $ Q Z ; . E ''ie ., ,�F x x x . x x . x £ jc°• r x � d� ,t. � � . � � �� x E � x E ,c�f xoE E x o ,c•6 .,0 �r f � f f 'bi �+ 0 D � �v K i "? � M � � � � � � �� ? 'Y � � r j 7 t �0 Q 0 �D 9 � �, _ 0 _ 0 II C� a 0� o D � � vp. t� p x z � � � � � i - - � -+ .� � Q1 E E � 8y1 �R £ a �� '7 E t f)v � �'0 E � �� £� �* �t " '� � �( �,c �� S +< 3Z . �` �S . [ c p � � 0 0 -1� ai o � p7� � ¢ � r r � i �< X =rl 'z 7�i !j .#< �_ �< ;< L� =�j O c a Yp � pP ? a � i a p F s = �� ' � � �� r� � �� i� ' Q; ^� p� �� 7 � �� i� � .wZ �� r { �r 'Fr �� 2� F� � �j { s� �r� � ,, Q b ;��=0 a d �0t is�z �t �.� 3r .u.� �v �o� x � o r � : g� � � � r �r : > � ' , � 0 ' � � � � � � ��j� � � � � _ � Z � Z ? _ � � � _ � i � � Z � 1 -'� � � Y� � � � � � 3 �1 { � � � � � � � � � � I � � �. 5�'' �� o ��; :3 '� 'z � � 0 Q a p 6 � � � 0 � ,-1 < D -�c � c " � E � f � � Z�i � � +f � Z � E � � F f £ � E 1 V 6 E d g � �%� � � � � �_ A a E c E s � s o � g � 5 S ��i '� '`� � 6 � � � � � � � � � � � � � � �� # ; 's � � � 7 p o = . .� Z�. � :� �x. � � � i ! � i � i G�1- � � � � a, E F � �.a� a �, �z( � px y� n �A; x n � e �� k �� - . 6�o aoo ' o�p o'�, • �` �Z3 �,#1 � �� a �' i� �� j ��1p � s� � � � � '7 �; 7j(S�{ ��j `3 � � i n v = i �� ;7 � � �� 70 ' �0 � a �{ � � � � 1 � . l� � OI .. tyki}��7 a jYi L� J�; T, � �- .D �� D 3� i a a a� �C� � D � ! � � r o°p9 � O �o � 0� ° '� m � �� F � � �4 � � L. , o � � � � ; + � �' � � • 0 z �� irl=Yi • � x� xy � ,� � �� ! �b"-o��' ° � � �� r c��' � �� 0� 0 �� n� �� g<i m � 1� 'r• � �,�+ �� V•� �� N•�' �� i�F� R Y•� x�� 'I� `�� n ,.�� `�# � i'� ax ��i`� +�� ' SYi ��i x E f x=! j ��f x f� �f � E E x� x E ep x�� E �E _E f �'£ •E E _ E f � � i s c0� �p 0 0 - � � 0 9 0 j0 d d 6 o d wO v �° 0 ..�0 C .. '�� i■ ti � ' � e �� Qj 0 y � f.. Pi � y Q w � o�'+' �> �' ►w � q� a ! , E►r E ,. E*, r � �� € � �� a� � �'�� _�� : �� .� �� '�� r" ' '� � � � � = io� � ;o � o€ _ � p ,u,�=6� ?o� :°� � t o io ;Y� _�� ; � � � � � � � � � � �'r � i 3 3 � � 3 � � � � � { i a -1 a -1 r i � _ � s -1 0 0 3 � U O V � 0 0 ; V A 9 0 � � 0 � 0 � 0 � � - � � � � � �i L ; � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � i' - � �;.' � i 3 � � � i � � � � � � � � � + i + � ' ' a � �~^:` �- � . '�:-� . r � � ^ � F s � t �� i�, � � � � e� t�� -- ,, �j j� i � ; � �� ' �� _ � � � � _ � � c .... ° __ � �� a ,; s a S � � p�� , � � �� ;� � �:� `.' �.:�` � j� s �� • � y� � � � � � i' • � r.> `- ( n e �' a p = �. ;' - F`..... � x � �� # � �: o� � � � , --: � �.... . � , �� . � � � � . a .. � - � � � � �� ='� �_ �� ,; �..,3 �. . . �I� l,�y�v� _ � ApDIT10N TQ THE EXISTING @UII.DING FOR AVJ PRADHAN ARCHITECf BRAHMA P_REMANANDA_ASHRAM-T_EMPLE 921 SW.MORRISON I411 w rorcrunu,ort�zas , 11515 S.W.HALL BLVD. TIGARD, OR 97223 I � ; ' I � � ; i , � � „t*r � _— ---.__..._..._--- — � � � ..,+..•- ,�, � -.'••' i ,iil��ij 1�� —- � � -- �� i � ' � . ; � I -- - �* • ; - — -- � �� _ .. __- --- � 1 `' '� �i i � 111 �I I � �� tr�� _ � �� ,; ;i � �ii;� � — , � _.�'� � - �� I x ; �r�.,?i � � � .�,;� cn -� � - � , , ,r ., -� � � .. _ � ,r� . . � . ,, �:. , _ ,, �, m � ' � --_ - :,�. — i � , .;, _ r i � , �'� I .1 ; � , , , r'i� �, � � _ , �,� i ,- � ,; i r : t �c �. 3� ;� � t— � � ,� � � I �-� � _ ' II : 1 ; 1 , x,,i , , � I {f I I 1 — -1 !' E, ' jl .►0 I `? { ''" � k� j ! � �� T � �'V � f � i � �ii� � P � � • .�• O �,. .:�� T � j� � r� . _ _ 11�_ � i. �r� � � � ; Z � Q j I� � I� � ,. „�; ,� � � � ' �' �--- -------- __...__ _ . C � I�' e � '�� ►- , ;�. t�� ' � ' —-- � � � ''' �'� � � ; � *� _ �� T .1� . •�� 'e •: � i •� ,� r i I� C � � �� °"� I 1�• � j "� 8.. j �� . i°�� rn � i � �� ;�. ' _�� r � �- �� t � .,�... -- ,,,,r a I � i! �� , ;� �7 '. i k .n x ��.' . -- ��1 ' ---- =1--- � --- '- -- - � - � ' '' � � =� - H i I I � . � il� � A.. --- ; —r1'---. � , ''� � �E ' � � - — � ' j {� i +' 'i ,r � , 'i Il`;(rl�l,�� L � ; .��. 1 1 Illl s � G � ��;�� s� r�%,,�;�- � � � �.�� I `� --- • '� i • t!' ��' r!i:,�� a � �< .f�,., _ . � ; I�� ;. � �'; i k� t � � T 2 �� T • f � �� t 1 ��;rrE _ � � � � ; _ �`-��;• i � { l: I II I II� . :�fi�S i��fx -. � I �' � �•� , � � I.'.l! '�'- .�yyy...��t., t -� I � 1 `a /� � , }, � , i I i`�,qr'�j+}F'. I I I .��. r I 3�) t�Z� p I i + � � ; ��:..� �tt4� I` ; I � : � ` ��i ' . _ i I.�,�� 4�i� . 1 '� i 1 —,.{ .f� ; .H'� � y�t�Y,- i y-e- - � � 1 �g � ,, l ,r�r �} ; 1 1 ,�, � � � ; � _a�� i � .�: � _ _ � � : • �. �� ;, � �'�� fi�F �� i . '� �'y�� I � � � i; � C ` E;�. I � ;i +�� 4 y, \ ;}t��a '-{t �� . I - - -- - - - - - �3-" t+i -- I ' : ,.I . , � . . _._ . -. - ._ � , E :fi �-, .`� � �** � .,_, , ; . , ,_' - �' _ __.._- _ � ,,,.�,,,.; i ! �� . +� . � ,f � —'�--�--.- ..�.. �;. �. � j ia r,� � ; : � i M� �"� � , , ��9N ' > � � { �5�: � � ' ' � � ; �� f ° ;i� � �-�,� i � ., „ 'i�- � j � r� �i L'a„ 1 � i r- � , i � -�- _ - - - _ - —- '} ��-n I ' � -. �' � . _ i �� . 1- a;;,.� i �' � � j M-1 _ i ,��' . �J � � � �- 1 `.�� I � , � - - -- �7 � I � i � ' _qa4� . L ' � ur� � P - � -% ' - � � , . • � �� ;��` S' t ,*.: �I -_.t1��a` .�r��s+��r.T.u+� I�eaR Iueaa.. �O I = � � / � S � � � . �---- - - '��j ��' � .' ' R . ` -�'.' ' _'... _ . �- _ . _ . � ` � ,�} . . . _._ . I ��. q � . _. I �'�I, �` � � l ,� , : F�. � r3s � �;� ��, ��. _ . � � � � ,_ , i � i� , .. � , w �i ti ��,��. _ -- � ��—r; a ��; _ . i �p;y' � .__ � ' _' ' z..i )a Yj;"�.r. I ......��\ �'1�{i .{!. I 1 °;F� 'r �;. � � t }( J � �y�� . � �t�` :��i �` 'C^��. i •��.1 (, t�� ' ` . f �:�?�';. +.,�� } s ,� e { �:;; •j�� •:r .;i --� � � ��-:. ... �� Y r' � .. 'i r:: � � _ �-� . i �,`��: �,, -, ;• C� � , '''' . �.. �-'� �� -i� , _ � � . '. i :\,-�, _ , . � i"� - �` t � . _ . _.. --- — --- ._. .. --- � � ; r ` � -- -- i I ', !� tl ` �� i ADDITION TO THE EXISTING BUILDING FOR` Avr P�nHnN ARCHITECI' , � BF�AHMA PREMANANDA ASHRAM-TEMPLE � '�'�NDROR 97�;' '�4� 11515 S.W.HALL BLYD. TIGARD, OR 97223 , , �