CUP2003-00005 . �
ti "
I 2G DAYS = I 0/4/2003 CITY OF TIGARD
DATE OF fILING: 8/I I/2003 Community�DeveCopment
SFcaping A Better Comraunity
CITY Of TIGARD
�Nas&ingtora County, Oregon
NOTICE OF FINAL ORDER BY THE HEARINGS OFFICER
Case Numbers: CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT CUP 2003-00005
Case Name: TIGARD CHURCH OF GOD EXPANSION
Name of Owner: Ti ard Church of God Attn: Bruce Plunkett
Name of Applicant: Zaik/Miller Associates Attn: Jackie Root
Address of Applicant: 2340 NW Thurman Street Suite 201 Portland Ore on 97210
Address of Property: 15670 SW 98 Avenue Ti ard Ore on 97224
Tax Ma /Lot Nos.: Washin ton Co. Tax Assessor's Ma No. 2S111CD, Tax Lot 300.
A FINAL ORDER INCORPORATING THE FACTS, FINDINGS AND CONCLUSIONS APPROVING A REQUEST FOR A fONDITIONAI USE. THE fITY OF TIGARD
HEARINGS OFFICER HAS REVIEWED TNE APPLIfANTS PLANS, NARRATIVE, MATERIALS, fOMMENTS Of REVIEWING AGENfIES, THE PIANNING DIVISION'S STAFF
REPORT AND RECOMMENDATIONS FOR THE APPLIfATION DESfRIBED IN FURTHER DETAII IN TNE STAFF REPORT. TNE HEARIN6S OFfICER HELD A PUBLIC
HEARING ON jULY 28, 2003 TO RECEIYE TESTIMONY REGARDING THIS APPLICATION. THIS DECISION HAS BEEN BASED ON THE FACTS, FINDINGS AND
fONCLUSIONS LONTAINED WITHIN THIS FINAL ORDER.
Request: ➢ The applicant is seeking Conditional Use approval to expand the existing facility by 2,875 square
feet for administrative offices and classrooms, and make site modifications to the parking and
landscaped areas. At the close of the record, the Hearings Officer conditionally approved
the application subject to the conditions of approval within this final order.
Zone: R-7: Medium-Density Residential District. Applicable Review Criteria: Community
Development Code Chapters: 18.330, 18.370, 18.390, 18.510, 18.705, 18.725, 18.745, 18.755,
18.765, 18.780, 18.790, 18.795 and 18.810.
Action: ➢ ❑ Approval as Requested � Approval with Conditions ❑ Denial
Notice: Notice was published in the newspaper and mailed to:
� Owners of Record Within the Required Distance � Affected Government Agencies
0 Area Citizen Involvement Team � The Applicants and Owners
The adopted findings of fact and decision can be obtained from the Planning Division/Community
Development Department at the City of Tigard City Hall.
Final Decision:
THIS DECISION IS FINAL ON AUGUST 12, 2003 AND BECOMES
EFFECTIVE ON AUGUST 27, 2003 UNLESS AN APPEAL IS FILED.
Appeal:
The decision of the Review Authority is final for purposes of appeal on the date that it is mailed. Any party with
standing as provided in Section 18.390.040.G.1. may appeal this decision in accordance with Section
18.390.040.G.2. of the Tigard Community Development Code which provides that a written appeal together with
the required fee shall be filed with the Director within ten (10) business days of the date the notice of the
decision was mailed. The appeal fee schedule and forms are available from the Planning Division of Tigard
City Hall, 13125 SW Hall Boulevard, Tigard, Oregon 97223.
THE DEADLINE FOR FILING AN APPEAL IS 5:00 PM ON AUGUST 26, 2003.
Questions: If you have any questions, please call the City of Tigard Planning Division at (503) 639-4171.
t
BEFORE THE LAND USE HEARINGS OFFICER
FOR THE CITY OF TIGARD,OREGON
Regarding an application by Tigard Church of God for a ) F I N A L O R D E R
conditional use permit for a 2,875-square foot office/classroom )
building as an expansion of the existing church at 15670 ) CUP 2003-00005
SW 98th Avenue in the R-7 zone in the City of Tigard, Oregon ) (Tigard Church of God)
A. SUMMARY
1. Bruce Plunkett filed the application for Tigard Church of God (the "applicant").
He requests approval of a conditional use permit to construct a 2,875-square foot building
for administrative offices and classrooms as an addition to the existing Tigard Church of
God at 15670 SW 98th Avenue; also known as tax lot 300, WCTM 2S111CD (the "site").
The Staff Report to the Hearings Officer dated August 5, 2003 (the "Staff Report")
contains a history of City review and development on the site,which the hearings officer
incorporates as his own.
2. Tigard Hearings Officer Larry Epstein (the"hearings officer")conducted a
duly noticed public hearing to receive testimony and evidence in the matter. At the public
hearing,City staff recommended conditional approval of the application. The applicant
accepted the recommended conditions with certain exceptions. Other than service providers,
no one else testified orally or in writing. The hearings officer closed the public record at the
end of the hearing. Disputed issues in this case include:
a. Whether the applicant is required to provide a loading space on the site;
b. Whether the applicant is required to provide additional bicycle parking;
c. Whether the applicant is required to modify the existing church building
to comply with certain building and/or fire standards not directly related to the proposed
expansion; and
d. Whether the applicant is required to obtain an NPDES permit.
3. The hearings officer concludes that the applicant sustained the burden of proof
for a conditional use permit, based on the findings and conclusions included and
incorporated herein and subject to conditions at the end of this final order.
B. HEARING AND RECORD
1. The hearings officer received testimony at the public hearing about this
application on July 28, 2003. All exhibits and records of testimony are filed with the Tigard
Department of Community Development. At the beginning of the hearing,the hearings
officer made the declaration required by ORS 197.763. The hearings officer disclaimed
any ex parte contacts,bias or conflicts of interest. The following is a summary by the
hearings officer of selected testimony offered at the public hearing in this matter.
2. City planner Brad Kilby summarized the Staff Report and recommended
approval of the application subject to the conditions provided therein.
a. He noted that the applicant did not submit a lighting plan. He requested
the hearings officer add a condition of approval requiring the applicant to submit a lighting
plan demonstrating compliance with City standards prior to issuance of building permits for
the proposed addition.
b. He noted that the Code requires the applicant to provide a loading space
on the site,because the church building complex will exceed a certain size, and the
requirement cannot be waived. However the City is flexible about the location and design of
the loading space. The applicant can identify an area of the parking lot as the proposed
loading space.
c. He noted that the Code requires the applicant to provide 8 bicycle parking
spaces. However the applicant can request approval of a Type II adjustment to reduce the
number of bicycle parking spaces based on the chazacteristics of the use.
d. He agreed with Ms. Root that the applicant is not required to obtain an
NPDES permit, because the site is smaller than 5 acres.
3. 7ackie Root and Edward Whitehead testified for the applicant.
a. Ms. Root accepted the Staff Report and recommended conditions with
certain exceptions.
i. She argued that a loading space is unnecessary. The church does
not distribute or receive goods by truck.
ii. She requested the hearings officer reduce the bicycle parking
requirement from 8 spaces to 5 spaces. The 5 existing bicycle parking spaces on the site
are more than adequate to serve the church. She was not aware of any church members
arriving at the site by bicycle.
iii. She argued that the applicant should not be required to modify
the existing church building to accommodate the expansion, based on her discussions with
the City building official and the fire marshal at the pre-application conference. She
submitted her notes from that meeting.
iv. She argued that the applicant is not required to obtain an NPDES
pemut,because the site is smaller than 5 acres.
v. She waived the applicant's right to have the record held open to
offer a closing written argument.
b. Mr. Whitehead testified that he has been a member of the church for 25
years,and the church has never needed a loading space during that time.
4. At the end of the hearing, the hearings officer closed the public record and
announced his intention to approve the application subject to recommended conditions with
certain amendments.
C. DISCUSSION
1. The Staff Report identifies [he applicable approval standards for the application
and applies them to the record in the case. The hearings officer agrees that the standards
identified in the Staff Report are all of the applicable standards and finds that they are
correctiy applied to the facts of the case in the Staff Report. Substantial evidence in the
record shows that the proposed use dces or can comply with the applicable approval criteria
CUP 2003-00005 ffearings O�cer Final Order
(Tigard Church of God) Page 2
for a CUP,and adoption of recommended conditions of approval as amended will ensure
final plans are submitted and implemented as approved consistent with those criteria and
standards and will prevent, reduce or mitigate potential adverse impacts of the development
consistent with the requirements of the Tigard Development Code (the "TDC"). The
hearings officer adopts the findings in the Staff Report as his own,except to the extent
inconsistent with the findings and conclusions in this final order.
2. The hearings officer finds that the applicant is not required to provide a loading
space on the site. TDC 18.765.080.A provides that off-street loading spaces are required
for"commercial, industrial and institutional buildings or structures to be built or altered
which receive and distribute material or merchandise by truck..." (Emphasis added). The
church does not receive or distribute material or merchandise by truck,based on the
testimony of Ms. Root and Mr. Whitehead. There is no substantial evidence to the
contrary. Therefore condition of approval 1 should be deleted.
3. TDC Table 18.765.2 requires that the applicant provide 1 bicycle parking space
for every 20 seats in the main assembly area of the church. The applicant's existing
sanctuary provides 160 seats. Therefore the applicant is required to provide 8 bicycle
parking spaces on the site.i TDC 18.765.OSO.E authorizes the director to reduce the number
of required bicycle parking spaces through a Type II adjustment. The applicant should be
allowed to request such an adjustment without a modification to this conditional use permit.
Condition of approval 8 should be modified to that effect.
4. City Building Division staff commented that the applicant will need to add one-
hour fire walls and make certain other modi�cations to the e�cisting church to accommodate
the proposed administration building. See page 20, Section VIII of the Staff Report. These
comments appear to conflict with Ms. Root's notes from the May 22, 2003 building permit
pre-application meeting. Based on Ms. Root's notes,City officials agreed to waive
structural modifications to the existing church if the applicant provided fire sprinklers.
However the hearings officer cannot resolve the conflict through this decision. The
hearings officer has no authority to implement or interpret the building and fire codes. That
authority rests solely with the City building official and the fire marshal,respectively.
5. The hearings officer finds that an NPDES permit is not required for this
development, because the site is smaller than 5 acres. The�nding that an NPDES permit is
required on page 19 of the Staff Report is incorrect.
6. TDC 18.360.090.A(10)provides that "[e]xterior lighting levels shall be selected
and the angles shall be oriented towards areas vulnerable to crime." The analysis in the
Staff Report concluded the application complies with this section because the Police
Department did not object to the plan,but the hearings officer finds that is not responsive to
the standard. The hearings officer further finds that it is feasible for the applicant to comply
with this standard by submitting a lighting plan for review and approval consistent with
TDC 18.360.090.A(10). Therefore the hearings officer concludes a condition of approval
is warranted requiring the applicant to submit to the planning staff for review and approval a
lighting plan showing that light fixtures are selected,designed and situated to direct light
towards areas of the site vulnerable to crime and away from abutting properties.
� 160/20=8 bicycle parking spaces
CUP 2003-00005 Hearings O�cer Final Order
(Tigard Church of God) Page 3
�
D. CONCLUSIONS
Based on the findings and discussion provided or incorporated in this final order,
the hearings officer concludes that the applicant sustained the burden of proof that the
proposed conditional use permit does or will comply with the applicable criteria of the
Community Development Code, provided development that occurs after this decision
complies with applicable local, state,and federal laws and with conditions of approval
warranted to ensure such compliance occurs in fact.
E. DECISION
In recognition of the�ndings and conclusions contained herein,and incorporating
the Staff Report and public testimony and exhibits received in this matter, the hearings
officer hereby approves CUP 2003-00005 (Tigard Church of God), subject to the following
conditions of approval:
�:�'°�: ��� � ����THE FOLLOWING CONDITIONS�SHALL BE SATISFIED ���� � �� �E �
::.: �
�.r, _z, _=PRIOR TO ISSUANCE OF THE SITE AND/OR BUILDING PERMITS:� ,a � _:�
Submit to the Planning Department (Brad Kilby, 639-4171, ext. 2434) for
review and approval:
1. The applicant shall comply with the tree protection measures prescribed by
the consulting arborist.
2. The applicant shall provide the city arborist with a construction sequence
including installation and removal of tree protection devices,clearing,
grading,and paving.
3. The applicant shall notify the city arborist when tree protection measures are
in place so that he may venfy that the measures will function properly prior
to construction.
4. The applicant shall submit a revised site plan that shows:
a. The manner in which crossings of the traffic aisles will be identified
in compliance with TDC Section 18.705.030(F)(3).
b. Provisions for a six-foot wall around the trash enclosure.
c. All access aisles, parking spaces,and direction of flow are clearly
identi�ed and marked as part of the parking lot striping.
d. Eight(8)bicycle-parking spaces designed and constructed to the
standards that are identified in TDC Section 18J65.050 or approval
of(or pending application for) a Type II adjustment reducing the
number of required bicycle parking spaces.
5. A lighting plan showing that light fixtures are selected, designed and situated
to direct light towards areas of the site vulnerable to crime and away from the
abutting properties. Light fixtures shall be provided in areas having heavy
pedestrian or vehicular traffic and in potentially dangerous areas such as
parking lots, stairs,ramps and abrupt grade changes. Fixtures shall be
placed at a height so that light patterns overlap at a height of seven feet,
which is sufficient to illuminate a person.
CUP 200.?-00005 Hearings O�cer Fina[Order
(Tigard Church of God) page 4
, � . � .
Submit to the Engineering Department (Kim McMillan, 639-4171, ext. 2642) for
review and approval:
6. A Public Facility Improvement(PFI) permit is required for this project to
cover the street trees and any other work in the public ri�ht-of-way. Six (6)
sets of detailed public improvement plans shall be subrrutted for review to
the Engineering Department. NOT'E: these plans are in addition to any
drawings required by the Building Division and should on��ude sheets
relevant to public improvements. Public Facility Improvement(PFI)permit
plans shall conform to City of Tigard Public Improvement Design
Standards, which are available at C�ty Hall and the City's web page
(www.ci.tigard.or.us).
7. The PFI permit plan submittal shall include the exact le�al name,address
and telephone number of the individual or corporate entity who will be
designated as the"Permittee", and who will provide the �nancial assurance
for the public improvements. For example,specify if the entity is a
co�oration, limited partnership,LLC,etc. Also specify the state within
which the entity is incotporated and provide the name of the corporate
contact person. Failure to provide accurate information to the Engineering
Department will delay processing of project documents.
8. The applicant'�construction plans shall show planting of street trees on the
east side of 98 Avenue.
9. The applicant shall provide connection of proposed addition to the public
sanitary sewerage system. A connection pernvt is required to connect to the
existing public sanitary sewer system.
10. The applicant shall provide an on-site water quality facility as required by
Clean Water Services Design and Construction Standards (adopted by
Resolution and Order No. 00-7). Final plans and calculations shall be
submitted to the Engineering Department(Kim McMillan)for review and
approval prior to issuance of the site pernut. In addition,a proposed
maintenance plan shall be submitted along with the plans and calculations
for review and approval.
11. An erosion control plan shall be provided as part of the Public Facility
Improvement(PFI)pernut drawings. The plan shall conform to the
"Erosion Prevention and Sediment Control Design and Planning Manual,
December 2000 edition."
�� ; THC FOLL�WING CONDITIONS SHALL I3E SATISFILll
PRIOR TO A FINAL BUILDING INSPECTION:
Submit to the Engineering Department (Kim McMillan, 639-4171, ext. 2642) for
review and approval:
12. Prior to a final building inspection, the applicant shall complete any work in
the�ublic right-of-way (or public easement)and obtain approval from the
Eng�neering Department.
13. The applicant shall either place the existing overhead utility lines along SW
98`�Avenue underground as a part of this project,or they shall pay the fee
in-lieu of undergrounding. The fee shall be calculated by the frontage of the
site that is�arallel to the utility lines and will be$27.50 per lineal foot. If
the fee opt�on �s chosen, the amount will be$10,862.00 and it shall be paid
prior to a final building inspection.
CUP 2003-00005 Hearings Officer Final Order
(Tigard Church of God) Page 5
�
14. Prior to final building inspection, the applicant shall pay the fee in-lieu of
constructing an on-site water quantity facility. The fee is based on the total
area of new impervious surfaces in the proposed development.
15. To ensure compliance with Clean Water Services design and construction
standards, the a�plicant shall employ the design engineer responsible for the
design and specifications of the�rivate water quality facility to perform
construction and visual observation of the water quality facility for
compliance with the design and specifications. These inspections shall be
made at si�nificant stages,and at completion of the construction. Prior to
final build�ng inspection, the design engineer shall provide the City of Tigard
(Inspection Supervisor)with written confirmation that the water quality
facility is in compliance with the design and specifications. Staff Contact:
Hap Watkins, Building Division.
FAILURE TO SATISFY THE C�NDITIONS OF APPROVAL WITHIN 18
� ������MONTHS O�THE EFFECTIV�DATE�OF TI�E H�ARINGS OFFICER'S
�DI:CI5ION SIIALL REND�R THE HLAKINGS OFFICER'S DECISION VOID.
DATED this l lth day of August, 2003.
Larry Epstein, ., CP
City of Tigard Land Use Hearings Officer
CUP 2003-00005 Hearings O�cer Final Order
(Tigard Church of God) Page 6
• ' �
Agenda Item: 2.1
Hearin Date: Jul 28 2003
STAFF REPORT TO THE
HEARINGS OFFICER CITYOFTIGARD
Community�Deve(oprreent
FOR THE CITY OF TIGARD, OREGON S(tapingABetterCommunity
120 DAYS = 10/4/2003
SECTION 1. APPLICATION SUMMARY
FILE NAME: TIGARD CHURCH OF GOD EXPANSION
CASE NO: Conditional Use Permit (CUP) CUP2003-00005
OWNER: Tigard Church of God
Attn: Bruce Plunkett
15670 SW 98�' Avenue
Tigard, OR 97224
APPLICANT: Zaik/Miller Associates
Attn: Jackie Root
2340 NW Thurman Street, Suite 201
Portland, OR 97210
PROPOSAL: The applicant is seeking Conditional Use Approval to expand the facility
by 2,875 square feet for administrative o�ces and classrooms, and make
site modifications to the parking and landscaped areas.
LOCATION: 15670 SW 98�'Avenue; WCTM 2S111CD, Tax Lot 300.
COMPREHENSIVE
PLAN and
ZONING
DESIGNATION: Medium-Density Residential; R-7: Religious Institutions and other civic
uses are permitted conditionally in the R-7 zoning district.
APPLICABLE
REVIEW
CRITERIA: Community Development Code Chapters 18.330, 18.360, 18.390, 18.510,
18.705, 18.725, 18.745, 18.755, 18.765, 18.780, 18.790, 18.795 and
18.810.
SECTION II. STAFF RECOMMENDATION
Staff recommends that the Hearings Officer find that the proposed Conditional Use Permit will
not adversely affect the health, safety and welfare of the City and meets the Approval
Standards as outlined in this report. Therefore, Staff recommends APPROVAL, subject to the
following recommended Conditions of Approval:
TIGARD CHURCH OF GOD EXPANSION PAGE 1 OF 21 CUP2003-00005
7/28/2003 PUBLIC HEARING STAFF REPORT TO THE HEARINGS OFFICER
� ' .
CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL
THE FOLLOWING CONDITIONS SHALL BE SATISFIED
PRIOR TO ISSUANCE OF THE SITE AND/OR BUILDING PERMITS:
u mit to t e anning epartment ra i y, , ext. or review an
approval:
1. Prior to site work, the a�plicant shall revise the parking plan to include one (1)
off-street loading space: aid space shall be designed and constructed to meet the
dimensional criteria in Tigard Development Code (TDC) Section 18.765.080(B).
2. The a�plicant shall comply with the tree protection measures prescribed by the
consulting arborist.
3. The applicant shall provide the city arborist with a construction sequence.including
installation and removal of tree protection devices, clearing, grading, and paving.
4. The applicant shall notify the city arborist when tree protection measures are in place
so that he may verify that the measures will function properly prior to construction.
5. The applicant shall revise the site plan to indicate the manner in which crossin s of
the traffic aisles will be identified in compliance with TDC Section 18.705.030(F)(3�.
6. Prior to the issuance of building permits, the applicant shall revise the plans to include
provisions for a six-foot wall around the trash enclosure.
7. Prior to the issuance of building permits: the applicant shall submit a revised site plan
that shows that all access aisles, parking spaces, and direction of flow are clearly
identified and marked as part of the parking lot striping.
8. Prior to the issuance of building permits, the applicant shall revise the parking plan to
accommodate 8 bicycle-parking spaces. Said spaces must be designed and
constructed to the standards that are identified in TDC Section 18.765.050.
Submit to the Engineering Department (Kim McMillan, 639-4171, ext. 2642) for review
and approval:
9. A Public Facility Improvement (PFI) permit is required for this project to cover the street
trees and any other work in the public nght-of-way. Six (6 sets of detailed public
improvement plans shall be submitted for review to the �ngineering Department.
NOTE: these plans are in addition to any drawings required by the Buildin Division and
should only mclude sheets relevant to public improvements. �ublic Facility
Improvement (PFI) permit plans shall conform to City of Tigard Public Improvement
Design Standards, which are available at City Hall and the City's web page
(www.ci.tiqard.or.us).
10. The PFI permit plan submittal shall include the exact legal name, address and telephone
number of the individual or corporate entity w�o w11 be designated as the "Permittee",
and who will provide the financial assurance for the public improvements. For example,
specify if the entity is a corporation, limited partnership, LLC, etc. Also specify the state
within which the entity is.mcorporated and provide the name of the corporate contact
person. Failure to provide accurate mformation to the Engineering Department will
delay processing of project documents.
11. Th� applicant's construction plans shall show planting of street trees on the east side of
98 Avenue.
12. The applicant shall provide connection of proposed addition to the public sanitary
sewerage system. A connection permit is required to connect to the existing public
sanitary sewer system.
TIGARD CHURCH OF GOD EXPANSION PAGE 2 OF 21 CUP2003-00005
7/28/2003 PUBLIC HEARING STAFF REPORT TO THE HEARINGS OFFICER
13. The applicant shall provide an on-site water uality facility as required by Clean Water
Services Design and Construction Standards�adopted by Resolution and Order No. 00-
7). Final plans and calculations shall be submitted to the Engineering Department (Kim
McMillan) for review and approval prior to issuance of the site permit. In addition, a
proposed maintenance plan shall be submitted along with the plans and calculations for
review and approval.
14. An erosion control plan shall be provided as part of the Public Facility Improvement
(PFI) permit drawings. The plan shall conform to the "Erosion Prevention and Sediment
Control Design and Planning Manual, December 2000 edition."
THE FOLLOWING CONDITIONS SHALL BE SATISFIED
PRIOR TO A FINAL BUILDING INSPECTION:
u mit to t e ngineering epartment im c i an, , ext. or review
and approval:
15. Prior to a final building inspection, the applicant shall complete any work in the public
right-of-way (or public easement) and obtain approval from the Engineenng Department.
16. The applicant shall either place the existing overhead utility lines along� SW 98�' Avenue
underground as a part of this project, or they shall pay the fee in-lieu of undergrounding.
The fee shall be calculated by the frontage of the site that is parallel to the utility lines
and will be $27.50 per lineal foot. If the fee option is chosen, the amount will be
$10,862.00 and it shall be paid prior to a final building inspection
17. Prior to final building inspection, the applicant shall pay the fee in-lieu of constructing an
on-site water quanfity facility. The fee is based on the total area of new impervious
surFaces in the proposed development.
18. To ensure compliance with Clean Water Services design and construction standards,
the applicant shall employ the design engineer responsible for the design and
specifications of the private water quality facility to perform construction and visual
observation of the water quality faci(ity for compliance with the design and
specifications. These inspections shall be made at significant stages, and at
completion of the construction. Prior to final building inspection, the design engmeer
shall provide the City of Tigard (Inspection Supervisor) with written confirmation that
the water quality facility is in compliance with the design and specifications. Staff
Contact: Hap Watkins, Building Division.
FAILURE TO SATISFY THE CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL WITHIN 18 MONTHS
OF THE EFFECTIVE DATE OF THE HEARINGS OFFICER'S DECISION
SHALL RENDER THE HEARINGS OFFICER'S DECISION VOID.
SECTION III. BACKGROUND INFORMATION
Site Historv:
The site was rezoned in 1975 for the Church of Christ, and subsequent approval of
SDR18-76 permitted the construction of the facility. The Tigard Church of God received
conditional use approval in 1977 under CU14-77 and SDR 34-77 to expand the facility. The
Church received approval in 1980 under CU20-80 to utilize a single-family residence on site
to hold bible study.
Vicinity Information:
The site is surrounded by property zoned for and developed with a mixture of residential
densities_ The Southwest Church of Christ is directly south of this site.
TIGARD CHURCH OF GOD EXPANSION PAGE 3 OF 21 CUP2003-00005
7/28/2003 PUBLIC HEARING STAFF REPORT TO THE HEARINGS OFFICER
13. The applicant shall provide an on-site water uality facility as required by Clean Water
Services Design and Construction Standards�adopted by Resolution and Order No. 00-
7). Final plans and calculations shall be submitted to the Engineering Department (Kim
McMillan) for review and approval prior to issuance of the site permit. In addition, a
proposed maintenance plan shall be submitted along with the plans and calculations for
review and approval.
14. An erosion control plan shall be provided as part of the Public Facility Improvement
�PFI) permit drawings. The plan shall confo�m to the "Erosion Prevention and Sediment
ontrol Design and Planning Manual, December 2000 edition."
THE FOLLOWING CONDITIONS SHALL BE SATISFIED
PRIOR TO A FINAL BUILDING INSPECTION:
u mit to t e ngineering epartment im c i an, , ext. or review
and approval:
15. Prior to a final building inspection, the applicant shall complete any work in the public
right-of-way (or public easement) and obtain approval from the Engineering Department.
16. The applicant shall either place the existing overhead utility lines along SW 98�' Avenue
underground as a part of this project, or they shall pay the fee in-lieu of undergrounding.
The fee shall be calculated by the frontage of the site that is parallel to the utility lines
and will be $27.50 per lineal foot. If the fee option is chosen, the amount will be
$10,862.00 and it shall be paid prior to a final building inspection
17. Prior to final buildin� inspection, the applicant shall pay the fee in-lieu of constructin� an
on-site water quantity facility. The fee is based on the total area of new impervious
surfaces in the proposed development and was calculated to be $ .
18. To ensure compliance with Clean Water Services design and construction standards,
the applicant shall employ the design engineer responsible for the design and
specifications of the private water quality facility to perform construction and visual
observation of the water quality facifity for compliance with the design and
specifications. These inspections shall be made at significant stages, and at
completion of the construction. Pnor to final building inspection, the design engineer
shalf provide the City of Tigard (Inspection Supervisor) with written confirmation that
the water quality facility is in compliance with the design and specifications. Staff
Contact: Hap Watkins, Building Division.
FAILURE TO SATISFY THE CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL WITHIN 18 MONTHS
OF THE EFFECTIVE DATE OF THE HEARINGS OFFICER'S DECISION
SHALL RENDER THE HEARINGS OFFICER'S DECISION VOID.
SECTION II1. BACKGROUND INFORMATION
Site Histo :
e site was rezoned in 1975 for the Church of Christ, and subsequent approval of
SDR18-76 permitted the construction of the facility. The Tigard Church of God received
conditional use approval in 1977 under CU14-77 and SDR 34-77 to expand the facility. The
Church received approval in 1980 under CU20-80 to utilize a single-family residence on site
to hold bible study.
Vicinit Information:
e site is surrounded by Property zoned.for and developed with a mixture of residential
densities. The Southwest Church of Christ is directly south of this site.
TIGARD CHURCH OF GOD EXPANSION PAGE 3 OF 21 CUP2003-00005
7/28/2003 PUBLIC HEARING STAFF REPORT TO THE HEARINGS OFFICER
, .
Site Information and Pro osal Descri tion:
e site is current y eve ope wit t e existing church. The current proposal involves a
2,875 square foot expansion for classrooms and administrative o�ces. The applicant is not
proposing to modify the existing sanctuary.
SECTION IV. DECISION MAKING PROCEDURES, PERMITS AND USE
Use Classification: Section 18.130.020
is s e se a egories.
The applicant is proposing to amend the existing conditional use permit to allow for expansion
of an existing church by 2,875 square feet. Churches are permitted by Conditional Use in all
zones. Conditional Use applications are subject to a public hearing before the City of Tigard
Hearings Officer.
Summa Land Use Permits: Chapter 18.310
e ines e ecision-ma ing type to which the land-use application is assigned.
The proposed amendment to the existing Conditional Use permit is a Type III-HO decision.
SECTION V. NEIGHBORHOOD COMMENTS
The Tigard Community DeveloPment Code requires that property owners within 500
feet of the subject site be notified of the proposal, and be given an opportunity for
written comments and/or oral testimony prior to a decision being made. In add�tion,
the applicant is required to post the site with notice of the public hearing.
Notice of the application was mailed and staff has verified that the site was posted. To date,
stafF has not received any letters in support or against the proposal.
SECTION VI. SUMMARY OF APPLICABLE CRITERIA
A summar�r of.the applicable criteria in this case, in the Chapter order in which they are
addressed in this reporE are as follows:
A. S ecific Conditional Use Criteria
enera pprova n eria
Additional Gonditions of A proval)
B. licable Develo mentpCode Standards
on i iona ses
18.360 Site Development Review)
18.510 Residential Zoning)
18.705 Access, Egress & Circulation
18.725 Environmental Performance tandards)
18.745 Landscaping and Screening)
18.755 Mixed Solid Vl/aste & Recycfable Storage)
18.765 Off-Street Parking and Loading Requirements)
18.780 signs)
18.790 Tree Removal)
18.795 Visual Clearance)
C. Additional Site Develo ment Review A roval Standards
D. ree an i i m rovemen an ar s
E. m ac u
TIGARD CHURCH OF GOD EXPANSION PAGE 4 OF 21 CUP2003-00005
7/28/2003 PUBLIC HEARING STAFF REPORT TO THE HEARINGS OFFICER
SECTION VI1. APPLICABLE REVIEW CRITERIA AND FINDINGS
A. SPECIFIC CONDITIONAL USE APPROVAL CRITERIA
Section 18.330.010.A states that the Purpose of this chapter is to provide standards
and procedures under which a conditional use may be perm�tted, enlarged or altered if
the site is appropriate and if other appropriate conditions of approval can be met.
There are certain uses which due to the nature of the im pacts on surrounding land
uses and public facilities require a case-by-case review and analysis.
Section 18.330.020.A states that a request for approval for a new conditional use shall
be processed as a Type III-HO procedure, as regulated by Chapter 18.390.050, using
approval criteria conta�ned in Section 18.330.030A and subject to other requirements
in Chapter 18.330.
General A roval Criteria for a Conditional Use: Section 18.330.030:
e si e size an imensions provi e a equa e area or e nee s of the proposed use;
According to the Washington County Assessor's Office, the existing site size is 2.77 acres.
This report evaluates the proposal and necessary applicable code requirements, and as
conditioned, the site size is adequate for the needs of the proposed 2,875 square foot
expansion.
The characteristics of the site are suitable for the proposed use considering size, shape,
location, topography, and natural features;
There are no apparent natural features on this site, and the size, shape, and location are not
extraordinary. As discussed in this report, the site appears suifable for the proposed
development.
All required public facilities have adequate capacity to serve the proposal; and
The site is already served by all required public facilities. According to the comments received,
all public facilities have adequate capacity to serve the site.
The applicable requirements of the zoning district are met except as modified by this
chapter.
The following table provides the dimensional standards in the R-7 zone, the additional
dimensional requirements for religious facilities are specified in the Conditional Use Standards
of Section 18.330.050.B.9 and the dimensions proposed for this development.
STANDARD R-7 CONDITIONAL USE PROPOSED
REQUIREMENT
Minimum Lot Size 5,000 sq.ft. 20,000 sq.ft 120,744 sq.ft
Minimum Lot Width 50 ft. 395.6ft
Minimum Setbacks
Front yard 15 ft 25 ft 74 ft
Side facing street on comer&through lots 10 ft 20 ft N/A
Side yard 5 ft 20 ft 144/51 ft
Rear yard 15 ft 20 ft 85 ft
Maximum Height 35 ft. Varies 22ft.
Maximum Site Coverage[2� 80% 6TY.[2]
Minimum Landscape Requirement 20% — 33°/.
[2] InGudes all buildings and impervious surfaces.
As identified in the table above, the a�plicant's plans show that the dimensional standards for
the base zone and Conditional Use s andards are met.
TIGARD CHURCH OF GOD EXPANSION PAGE 5 OF 21 CUP2003-00005
7/28/2003 PUBLIC HEARING STAFF REPORT TO THE HEARINGS OFFICER
The supplementary requirements set forth in other chapters of this Code including but
not limited to Chapter 18.780, Signs, and Chapter 18.360, Site Development Review, if
applicable, are met or can be conditioned to be satisfied.
The applicable review criteria in this case include the following chapters of the Communi�
Development Code: 18.330, Conditional Use; 18.360, Site Development Review; 18.39 ,
Decision Makmg Procedures; 18.510, Residential Zoning Districts; 18.705, Access, Egress and
Circulation; 18.725, Environmental Performance Sfandards; 18.745, Landscaping and
Screening; 18.755, Mixed Solid Waste and Recyclables Storage; 18.765, Off-Street Parking;
18.780, Signs; 18.790, Tree Removal; 18.795, Visual Clearance Areas; and 18.810, Street and
Utility Improvement Standards. The development standards and requirements of these
chapters are addressed further in this report.
The proposal contains no elements related to the provisions of the following cha pters:
Variances and Adjustments; 18.390, 18.600, Community Plan Area Standards; 18.710,
Accessory Residential Units; 18.715, Density Computations; 18.720, Design Compatibility
Standards; 18.730, Exceptions to Development Standard; 18.740, Historic Overlay; 18.74�,
Home Occupations; 18.750, Manufactured/Mobile Home Regulations; 18.760, Nonconforming
Situations; 18.775, Sensitive Lands; 18.785, Temporary Uses; and 18.798, Wireless
Communications Facilities. These chapters are, therefore, found to be inapplicable as
approval standards.
The use will comply with the applicable policies of the Comprehensive Plan.
The Comprehensive Plan is implemented by the Community Development Code. Compliance
with Comprehensive Plan policies are, therefore, assured by satisfaction of the applicable
development standards of the development code as addressed within this report.
FINDING: Based on the analysis above, the General Approval Criteria for a Conditional Use
have been satisfied.
Additional Conditions of A roval for Conditional Use.
ection . . s a es a e earings u ori y may impose conditions on the
approval of a conditional use, which are found necessary to ensure the use is
compatible with other uses in the vicinity, and that the impact of the proposed use on
the surrounding uses and public facilities is minimized. These conditions may
include, but are not limited to the following:
Limiting the hours, days, place and/or manner of operation;
The majority of activities for the Church occur on weekends and evenings. A search of the
city's code enforcement records shows no complaints against the existing church operations.
Staff finds no reason or circumstance to impose conditions limiting the hours, days, and/or
manner of operation.
Requiring design features, which minimize environmental impacts such as noise,
vibration, air pollution, glare, odor and/or dust;
The hazards related to odor, dust, noise, glare,, air pollution, and vibration can be mitigated
through the design of the building and the buffenng and landscaping of the use that has been
proposed as conditions of approval. Those hazards that are inherent during construction will
be held to the same standards as other construction within the City of Tigard as regulated by
the Tigard Municipal Code (TMC). All of these items will be sub�ect to local and state
enforcement review if the applicant exceeds the allowed levels.
Requiring additional setback areas, lot area, andlor lot depth or width;
The buffer requirements are discussed further in this report.
Limiting the building height, size or lot coverage, and/or location on the site;
TIGARD CHURCH OF GOD EXPANSION PAGE 6 OF 21 CUP2003-00005
7/28/2003 PUBLIC HEARING STAFF REPORT TO THE HEARINGS OFFICER
Based on the plans submitted, the applicant has designed and placed the building such that
it meets the underlying zone requirements, as well as, the additional requiremenfs imposed
on conditional uses.
Designating the size, number, location and/or design of vehicle access points;
The applicant is proposing to utilize the two existing accesses off of SW 98�' Avenue. There
are no new accesses proposed or required for this addition.
Requiring street right-of-way to be dedicated and street(s) to be improved;
Although there are no required street dedications, the applicant will be required to plant street
trees along the frontage to complete the street improvements. Street trees specifics have
been addressed later in this report.
Requiring landscaping, screening, drainage and/or surfacing of parking and loading
areas;
The applicant has proposed, to restripe the parking lot and add some new trees and
vegetation to screen the parking area and blend the new building with the existing church.
These items are discussed in more detail later in this discussion.
Limiting the number, size, location, height and/or lighting of signs;
There are no new signs proposed with this expansion.
Limiting or setting standards for the location and/or intensity of outdoor lighting;
Lighting is addressed later in this report.
Reguiring berms, screening or landscaping and the establishment of standards for
their installation and maintenance;
There is no evidence in the record to suggest that this particular pro�osal would trigger a
need for any additional berming, screer�ng and or landscaping. The facility is already
partially screened by a berm alo.ng SW 98t Avenue. This criterion is met.
Requiring and designating the size, height, location and/or materials for fences;
The applicant has not proposed an�r new fencing, and there is no requirement to provide
additional fencing for this pro�ect. This criterion is satisfied.
Requiring the protection and preservation of existing trees, soils, vegetation,
watercourses, habitat areas andlor drainage areas;
The applicant has provided a tree preservation plan that will be discussed further in this
report. .There are no watercourses, habitat areas, drainage areas, or vegetation other than
domesticated that will be affected by this proposal.
Requiring the dedication of su�cient open land area for a greenway adjoining.and
within the floodplain when land form alterations and development are allowed w�thin
the 100-year floodplain; and
This development is not adjacent to the 100-year floodplain; therefore, a condition is not
necessary.
Requiring the construction of a pedestrian/bicycle pathway within the floodplain in
accordance with the adopted pedestrian/bicycle pathway plan.
This development is not adjacent to the 100-year floodplain, therefore, a condition is not
necessary.
TIGARD CHURCH OF GOD EXPANSION PAGE 7 OF 21 CUP2003-00005
7/28/2003 PUBLIC HEARING STAFF REPORT TO THE HEARINGS OFFICER
B. APPLICABLE DEVELOPMENT CODE STANDARDS
Site Develo ment Review — Cha ter 18.360:
e i e eve opmen eview approva s andards require that a development proposal be
found to be consistent with the vanous standards of the Community Development Code. The
proposal's consistency with these Code Chapters is reviewed in the following sections.
Residential Zonin Districts — Cha ter 18.510:
e resi en ia zoning is ric eve opmen s andards are discussed previously in this report
under the Conditional Use standards. It should be noted that Religious Inst�tutions are
permitted conditionally in all residential zones.
Access E ress and Circulation - Cha ter 18.705:
ec ion . . . . s a es a an access report shall be submitted with all new
development proposals which verifies design of driveways and streets are safe by
meeting ade4uate stacking needs, sight distance and deceleration standards as set by
ODOT, Washington County, the City and AASHTO.
The proposed addition to this facility is to provide office space for current staff members.
The applicant has indicated that the add�tion wi�l not generate new trips to the church site.
There are two existing driveways that access 98 Avenue and the applicant is not proposing
any changes to these driveways.
Section 18.705.030.H.2 states that driveways shall not be permitted to be placed in the
influence area of collector or arterial street intersections. Influence area of
intersections is that area where queues of traffic commonly form on approach to an
intersection. The minimum driveway setback from a collector or arterial street
intersection shall be150 feet, measured from the right-of-way line of the intersecting
street to the throat of the proposed driveway. The setback may be greater dependin
upon the influence area, as determined from City Engineer review of a traffic im pac�
report submitted by the ap plicant's traffic engineer. In a case where a roject has less
than 150 feet of street frontage, the applicant must explore any op�ion for shared
access with the adjacent parcel. If shared access is not possible or practical, the
driveway shall be placed as far from the intersection as possible.
The existing driveways are not located within the influence area of collector or arterial streets.
Section 18.705.030.H.3 and 4 states that the minimum spacing of driveways and
streets along a collector shall be 200 feet. The minimum s�acing of driveways and
streets along an arterial shall be 600 feet. The minimum spacing of local streets along
a local street shall be 125 feet.
The existing driveways are located along 98�' Avenue, which is designated as a
Neighborhood Route.
Public Street Access:
All vehicular access and egress as required in Sections 18.705.030(H) and
18.705.030(I) shall connect directly with a publ�c or private street approved by tFie city
for public use and shall be maintained at the required standards on a continuous
basis;
The ap p_licant has existing access to SW 98�' Avenue, which is a public street. This criterion
is satisfied.
Walkways:
On-site pedestrian walkways shall comply with the following standards: Walkways
shall extend from the ground floor entrances or from the �round floor landing of stairs,
ramps, or elevators of all commercial, institutional, and industrial uses, to the streets
which provide the required access and egress. Walkways shall provide convenient
connections between buildings in multi-building commercial, institutional, and
industrial complexes. Unless impractical, walkways shall be constructed between
new and existing developments and neighboring developments;
TIGARD CHURCH OF GOD EXPANSION PAGE 8 OF 21 CUP2003-00005
7/28/2003 PUBLIC HEARING STAFF REPORT TO THE HEARINGS OFFICER
The existing facility already has designated walkways to SW 98�' Avenue and the applicant
has indicated in the narrative that the sidewalk will provide connectivity to this sidewalk as
required. This criterion is satisfied.
Wherever required walkways cross vehicle access driveways or parking lots, such
crossings shall be designed and located for pedestrian safety. Required walkways
shall be physically separated from motor vehicle traffic and park�ng by either a
minimum 6-inch vertical separation (curbed) or a minimum 3-foot horizontal
separation, except that pedestrian crossings of traffic aisles are permitted for
distances no greater than 36 feet if appropriate landscaping, pavement markings, or
contrasting pavement materials are used. Walkways shall be a minimum of four feet in
width, exclusive of vehicle overhangs and obstructions such as mailboxes, benches,
bicycle racks, and sign posts, and shall be in compliance with ADA standards; and
The walkways have been identified on the site plan. All existing walkways are five feet in
width. No proposed walkway is less than 5-feet in width. All proposed walkways across
traffic aisles are less than 36 feet in length, but it has not been determined how those
crossings will be identified. The applicant may propose to mark the crossing at the same
time that the parking lot is restriped. This criterion is not satisfied.
FINDING: The application fails to identify by which means the parking lot crossings will be
identified.
CONDITION:The applicant shall revise the site plan. to .indicate the manner in which
crossings of the tfaffic aisles will be identified in compliance with TDC Section
18.705.D30(F)(3).
Required walkwaxs shall be paved with hard surfaced materials such as concrete,
asphalt, stone, brick, etc. Walkways may be required to be lighted and/or signed as
needed for safety purposes. Soft-surFaced public use pathways may be provided only
if such pathways are provided in addition to required pathways.
The applicant indicates that the new sidewalks will be constructed of concrete. This criterion
has been satisfied.
Minimum Access Requirements for Commercial and Industrial Use:
Section 18.705.030.1 provides the minimum access requirements for commercial and
industrial uses: Table 18.705.3 indicates that the required access width for
developments with more than 100 parking spaces is two 30-foot-wide accesses with a
24-foot pavement width or one 50-foot wide access with 40-feet of pavement.
The TDC Table 18.705.3 requires a minimum of two, 30-foot accesses with 24-feet of
pavement, or one 50-foot access with 40-feet of pavement. The existing development satisfies
this standard by already providing finro 30-foot accesses with pavement widths of 24-feet. This
criterion is satisfied.
Environmental Performance Standards—Cha ter 18.725:
equires a e era an s a e environmen a aws, ru es and regulations be applied to
development within the City of Tigard. Section 18.725.030 Performance Standards
regulates: Noise, visible emissions, vibration and odors.
Noise. For the purposes of noise regulation, the provisions of Sections 7.41.130
roug 7.40.210 of the Tigard Municipal Code shall apply.
Visible Emissions. Within the Commercial zoning districts and the Industrial Park (I-P)
zoning is ric , ere shall be no use, operation or activity which results in a stack or
other point- source emission, other than an emission from space heating, or the
emission of pure uncombined water (steam) which is visible from a Property line.
Department of Environmental Quality (DEQ) rules for visible emissions (340-21-015 and
340-28-070) apply.
TIGARD CHURCH OF GOD EXPANSION PAGE 9 OF 21 CUP2003-00005
7l28/2003 PUBLIC HEARING STAFF REPORT TO THE HEARINGS OFFICER
Vibration. No vibration other than that caused by highway vehicles, trains and aircraft is
permi�d in any given zoning district, which is discernible without instruments at the
property line of the use concerned.
Odors. The emissions of odorous gases or other matter in such quantities as to be
reaair detectable at any point beyond the property line of the use creating the odors is
prohibited. DEQ rules for odors (340-028-090) apply.
Glare and heat. No direct or sky reflected glare, whether from floodlights or from high
em�era ure processes such as combustion or weldin�, which is visible at the lot line
shall be permitted, and; 1} there shall be no emission or transmission of heat or
heated air which is discernible at the lot line of the source; and 2) these regulations
shall not apply to signs or floodli�hts in parking areas or construction equipment at
the time of construction or excavation work otherwise permitted by this title.
Insects and rodents. All materials including wastes shall be stored and all grounds
s a e main a�ne in a manner which will not attract or aid the propagation of insects
or rodents or create a health hazard.
FINDING: Based on the information provided by the applicant, the expanded use of the
property will conform to the above requirements. If for some reason the above
standards were in question, and it was subsequently found that the use was out
of compliance with any of the above standards, the Qroperty owner would be
subject to code enforcement, court review, and possible fines until they were
brought back into compliance. .A search of city records does not indicate any
code enforcement issues associated with the existing use.
Landsca in and Screenin — Cha ter 18.745:
ree rees: ec ion . . s a es a all development pro ects fronting on a
public street shall be required to plant street trees in accor�ance with Section
18.745.040.0 Section 18.745.040.0 requires that street trees be spaced between 20
and 40 feet apart depending on the size classification of the tree at maturity (small,
medium or large).
The subject site has 395 feet of frontage along SW 98"' Avenue. Therefore, the development
would require the installation of street trees as prescribed in TDC Chapter 18.745. The
applicant has provided a street tree plan and indicated in the n�rrative that eleven (11) new
street trees will be provided at 30-foot intervals along SW 98 Avenue. The applicants'
landscape architect has proposed to plant flowering cherry trees, which are approved street
trees at 30 feet on center. This proposal meets the species and spacing standards as required
within the chapter. This critenon is satisfied.
Land Use Buffering and Screening:
Buffering and Screening is required between different txpes of land uses. It is the intent
of these standards to provide for privacy and protection and reduce or eliminate the
adverse impacts of visual or noise pollution that a development site may impose on
adjacent properties.
The proposed use is in a residential zone and partially abutting residential uses on three
sides, It is also adjacent to a gol� course to the north and east, and to another church directly
south. The facility fronts SW 98" Avenue. In these locations, buffering is.not required. Staff
has visited the site and the buffer area is very large and .has been previously landscaped.
The applicant is proposing to increase the landscaping within the parki�g areas and along
the southern boundary, as well as, planting street trees along SW 98 Avenue. Staff is
confident that the landscaping and screening that is existing, and that is proposed will satisfy
any need for buffering and screening from this addition. There is no need to require
additional buffering and screening from ad�acent uses. This criterion is satisfied.
TIGARD CHURCH OF GOD EXPANSION PAGE 10 OF 21 CUP2003-00005
7/28/2003 PUBLIC HEARING STAFF REPORT TO THE HEARINGS OFFICER
Screening -Special Provisions:
Section 18.745.050.E requires the screening of parking and loading areas. Landscaped
parking areas shall include special design features, which effectively screen the parking
lot areas from view. Planting materials to be installed should achieve a relative balance
between low lying and vertical shrubbery and trees. Trees shall be planted in
landscaped islands in all parking areas, and shall be equally distributed on the basis of
one (1} tree for each seven (7) parking spaces in order to provide a canopy effect. The
minimum dimension on the landscape islands shall be three (3) feet wide and the
landscaping shall be protected from vehicular damage by some form of wheel guard or
curb.
The existing parking area is already compliant with the requirements of the TDC, and the
applicant has provided the City with a landscape plan that demonstrates compliance with the
standards within the TDC around the parking area that is to be restriped. This criterion is
satisfied.
Mixed Solid Waste and Rec clables Stora e— Cha ter 18.755:
ap er . requires a new cons ruc ion incorPora es functional and adequate
space for on-site storage and e�cient collection of mixed solid waste and source
separated Recyclables prior to pick-up and removal by haulers.
The applicant must choose one (1) of the following four (4) methods to demonstrate
compliance: Minimum Standard, 11Vaste Assessment, Comprehensive Recyclin� Plan,
or Franchised Hauler Review and Sign-Off. The applicant will have to submit evidence
or a plan, which indicates compliance with this section. Regardless of which method
chosen, the applicant will have to submit a written sign-off from the franchise hauler
regarding the facility location and compatibility.
The applicant has stated that the location of the existin� facility will not change and has
indicated that the service provider is satisfied with continuing regular service at that location.
This standard is satisfied.
Location Standards.
To encoura9 e its use, the storag e area for source-separated recyclable shall be co-
located wit�i the storage area for residual mixed solid waste; fndoor and outdoor
storage areas shall comply with Uniform Building and Fire Code requirements;
Storage area space requirements can be satisfied with a single location or multiple
locations, and can combine both interior and exterior locations; Exterior storage areas
can be located within interior side yard or rear yard areas. Exterior stora e areas shall
not be located within a required front yard setback or in a yard adjacent�o a public or
private,street; Exterior storage areas shall be located in central and visible focations
on a site to enhance securify for users• Exterior storage areas can be located in a
parking area, if the proposed use provic�es at least the minimum number of parking
spaces required for the use after deducting the area used for storage. Stora�ge areas
shall be app ropriately screened according to the provisions in 18.755.050 C; design
standards• The storage area shall be accessible for collection vehicles and located so
that the s{orage area will not obstruct pedestrian or vehicle traffic movement on the
site or on public streets adjacent to the site.
The applicant does not intend to change the size or location of the existing facility. The
existing facility �s already within the south parking lot. This standard has been met.
Design Standards.
The dimensions of the storage area shall accommodate containers consistent with
current methods of local collection; Storage containers shall meet Uniform Fire Code
standards and be made and covered with waterproof materials or situated in a covered
area; Exterior storage areas shall be enclosed by a sight-obscuring fence wall, or
hedge at least six feet in height. Gate openings which allow access to users and
haulers shall be provided. Gate,openings for haulers shall be a minimum of 10 feet
wide and shall be capable of being secured in a closed and open position; Storage
area(s) and containers shall be clearly labeled to indicate the type of materials
accepted.
TIGARD CHURCH OF GOD EXPANSION PAGE 11 OF 21 CUP2003-00005
7/28/2003 PUBLIC HEARING STAFF REPORT TO THE HEARINGS OFFICER
Staff has visited the site and the facility is screened, however, the applicant is proposing to
rebuild the screen with a brick wall of four feet in height. This criterion is not satisfied.
FINDING: The applicant has proposed a four foot high wall to screen the facility; however,
the development code requires a six-foot screen.
CONDITION:Prior to the issuance of building permits, the applicant shall revise the plans to
include provisions for a six-foot wall around the trash enclosure.
Off-Street Parkinq and Loadinq (18.765):
BisabTd= c�i e ar ing:
All parking areas shall be provided with the required number of parking spaces for
disabled persons as specified by the State of Oregon Uniform Building Code and
federal standards. Such parking spaces shall be sized, signed and marked as
required by these regulations.
According to the Ore on Uniform Building Code, a parking facility accommodating 101-150
spaces requires five �) ADA accessible spaces. _The applicant has indicated that there will
be a total of seven (7) throughout the site. This criterion is satisfied.
Access Drives:
With regard to access to public streets from off-street parking: access drives from the
street to off-street parking or loading areas shall be designed and constructed to
facilitate the flow of traffic and provicfe maximum safety for pedestrian and vehicular
tra�c on the site; the number and size of access drives shall be in accordance with
the requirements of Chapter, 18.705, Access, Egress and Circulation; access drives
shall be clearly and permanently marked and defined through use of rails, fences,
walls or other barriers or markers on frontage not occupied by service drives; access
drives shall have a minimum vision clearance in accordance with Chapter 18.795,
Visual Clearance; access drives shall be improved with an asphalt or concrete
surface; and excluding single-family and duplex residences, except as provided by
Subsection 18.810.030.P, groups of two or more parking spaces shall be served by a
service drive so that no backing movements or other maneuvering within a street or
other public right-of-way will be required.
The applicant is proposin to utilize the two existing accesses. The TDC requires two,
30-foot accesses with twen�y-four feet of pavement. Tfiis criterion is satisfied.
Loading/unloading driveways:
A driveway designed for continuous forward flow of passenger vehicles for the
purpose of loading and unloadin passengers shall be located on the site of any
school or other meeting place w�ich is designed to accommodate more than 25
people at one time.
The applicant did not specifically address this criterion, however, a visit to the site and review
of the site plan indicates that this criterion is easily satisfied by the location of the two (2}
accesses and the main entrance. This criterion is satisfied.
Parking Lot Striping:
Except for single-family and duplex residences, any area intended to be used to meet
the off-street parking requirements as contained in this Chapter shall have all parking
spaces clearlY marked; and all interior drives and access aisles shall be clearly
marked and signed to show direction of flow and maintain vehicular and pedestrian
safety.
The applicant has indicated that the parkin� lot will be restriped and has indicated striping on
the plans. However, the applicants restriping plan does not include provisions to mark
access aisles and direction of flow. This criterion has not been met.
FINDING: The applicant does not clearly mark the access aisles and direction of flow as
required.
TIGARD CHURCH OF GOD EXPANSION PAGE 12 OF 21 CUP2003-00005
7/28/2003 PUBLIC HEARING STAFF REPORT TO THE HEARINGS OFFICER
CONDITION:Prior to the issuance of building permits, the applicant shall submit a revised
site plan that shows that all access aisles, parking spaces, and direction of flow
are clearly identified and marked as part of the parking lot striping.
Space and Aisle Dimensions:
Table 18.765.1. outlines the minimum dimensions for angled parking.
The parkin areas are pre-existing and staff has reviewed the areas that are to be restriped.
According,�o the site plan, the dimensional requirements of the restriped parking areas meet
the minimum dimensional requirements as outlined in Table 18.765.1 for 90 degree parking.
Minimum Bicycle Parking Requirements:
The total number of required bicycle parking spaces for each use is specified in Table
18.765.2 in Section 18.765.070.H.
The TDC requires one (1) parking space for every 20 seats in the main assembly area. The
applicant has indicated that the mam sanctuary currently seats 160 patrons. Therefore, the
applicant is required to, provide eight (8) sQaces for bicycles. The applicant has indicated that
although there is no existing bike rack on site, they will construct a five stall space at the front of
the sanctuary. This criterion is not satisfied.
FINDING: The applicant has not adequately addressed the minimum bicycle parking
requirements and design standards as required by TDC Sections 18.765.050 and
18.765.070.
CONDITION: Prior to the issuance of building permits, the applicant shall revise the parking
plan to accommodate 8 bicycle-parking spaces. Said spaces must be designed
and constructed to the standards that are identified in TDC Section 18.765.050.
Minimum Off-Street Parking:
Section 18.765.070.H states that the minimum and maximum parking shall be as
required in Table 18.765.2.
As a result of a code amendment by the Tigard City Council in March, 2002, religious
institutions must provide one (1) parking space for every three (3) seats in the main assembly
area. With seating for 160 in the main sanctuary, the church is required to provide a
minimum of 53 off-street parking spaces. The applicant has exceeded the minimum parking
requirements. The church is in parking zone B, therefore, the maximum amount of parking
they can .provide is one (1) space for every 1.3 seats or in this case 123 spaces. The
applicant is proposing a total of 107. This criterion is satisfied.
Off-street loading requirements:
Off-street loading spaces: Commercial, industrial and institutional buildings ,or
structures to be built or altered which receive and distribute material or merchandise
by truck shall provide and maintain off-street loading and maneuvering space as
follows:
1. A minimum of one loading space is required for buildings with 10,000 gross
square feet or more•
2. A minimum of two �oading spaces for buildings with 40,000 gross square feet or
more.
Off-street loadin� dimensions:
1. Each loading berth shall be approved by the City Engineer as to design and
location;
2. Each loading space shall have sufficient area for turning and maneuvering of
vehicles on the site. At a minimum, the maneuvering length shall not be less than
twice the overall length of the longest vehicle using the facility site;
3. Entrances and exits for the loading areas shall be provided at locations approved
by the City Engineer in accordance with Chapter 18.710;
TIGARD CHURCH OF GOD EXPANSION PAGE 13 OF 21 CUP2003-00005
7/28/2003 PUBLIC HEARING STAFF REPORT TO THE HEARINGS OFFICER
4. Screening for ofF-street loading facilities is required and shall be the same as
screening for parking lots in accordance with Chapter 18.745.
Because of the size of the overall building, the church would be required to provide one (1)
off-street loading space to meet the standard. The applicant contends that the church does not
receive or distribute merchandise. Unfortunately the development code does not differentiate
when the overall gross building size is 10,000 square feet or more. This criterion is not
satisfied.
FINDING: The applicant has not addressed the need for off-street loading facilities as
required by TDC Section 18.765.080.
CONDITION: Prior to site work, the applicant shall revise the parking plan to include one (1)
off-street loading space. Said space shall be desi ned and constructed to meet
the dimensional criteria in TDC Section 18.765.080�6).
Tree Removal — Cha ter 18.790
ec ion . . requires at a tree plan for the planting, removal and protection of
trees prepared by a certified arborist be provided for a conditional use application.
The tree plan sfiall include identification of all existing trees, Identification of a
program to save existing trees or mitigate tree removal over 12 inches in caliper,
identification of which trees are proposed to be removed, and a protection program
defining standards and methods that will be used by the applicant to protect frees
during and after construction.
The plan shows 25 trees on site over twelve inches in diameter. Of those trees, the applicant
is certain that two (2), possibly three (3) will need to be removed to accommodate
construction. In the worse case scenario, the applicant is still maintaining.88% of those trees
on site that are over 12 inches in diameter. Therefore, no mitigation is necessary. The
applicant has provided a tree protection plan from Terrill Collier, certified arborist. To ensure
that the tree protection measures are in place, and the tree preservation plan is
implemented, the following conditions shall apply.
FINDING: The applicant has proposed to retain 88% percent of trees over twelve inches
on site and is not subJ ect to any required tree mitigation in accordance with
TDC Section 18.790.030. In order to insure the viability. of the existing trees
and those trees within the area of work, the following conditions shall apply
CONDITIONS:
. The applicant shall comply with the protection measures prescribed by
the consulting arborist.
. The applicant shall provide the city arborist with a construction sequence
including installation and removal of tree protection devices, clearing,
grading, and paving.
. The applicant shall notify the city arborist when tree protection measures
are in place so that he may verify that the measures will function properly
prior to construction.
Visual Clearance Areas — Cha ter 18.795:
ec ion . . . s a es a e provisions of this chapter shall apply to,all
development including the construction of new structures, the remodeling of existing
structures and to a c-hange of use which increases the on-site parking or loading
requirements or which changes the access requirements.
Section 18.795.030.B. states that a clear vision area shall contain no vehicle, hedge,
planting, fence, wall structure or tem�orary or permanent obstruction (except for an
occasional utility pole or tree), exceeding three feet in height, measured from the top
of the curb, or where no curb exists, from the street center line grade, except that
trees exceeding this height may be located in this area, provided all branches below
eight feet are removed.
TIGARD CHURCH OF GOD EXPANSION PAGE 14 OF 21 CUP2003-00005
7/28/2003 PUBLIC HEARING STAFF REPORT TO THE HEARINGS OFFICER
There are no proposed structures inside of the vision clearance area and the applicant has
stated in the narrative, that all landscaping within the vision clearance area will be maintained
as required by the Tigard Development Code. On-going maintenance of the vision clearance
triangle is rec�uired and any violation of this triangle, will be addressed through the City of
Tigard Code Enforcement process. This standard is satisfied.
C. ADDITIONAL SITE DEVELOPMENT REVIEW APPROVAL CRITERIA
Section 18.360.090(A)(2) through 18.360.090(A)(15) provides additional Site DeveloQment
Review approval standards not necessarily covered by the provisions of the previously
listed sect�ons. These additional standards are addressed immediately below with the
following exceptions:
The proposal contains no elements related to the provisions of the following and are, therefore,
found to be inapplicable as approval standards:
18.360.090.3 (Exterior Elevations);); 18.360.090.5 (Privacy and Noise: Multi-family or Group
Living Uses); 18.360.090.6 (Private Outdoor Areas: Multi-family Use}; 18.360.090.7 (Shared
Outdoor Recreation Areas: Multi-family Use); 18.360.090.8 (100-year floodplain) and
18.360.090.9 (Demarcation of Spaces).
The following sections were discussed previously in this decision and, therefore, will not be
addressed in this section:
18.360.090.13 Parkin�); 18.360.090.12 (Landscaping), 18.360.090.13 (Drainage); and
18.360.090.14 �Provision for the Disabled); 18.360.090.15 (Provisions of the underlying zone).
Com liance with all of the a licable re uirements of this title includin Cha ter 18.810
ree an i i an ar s:
As discussed in this report, all applicable sections have been addressed and where the
proposal is deficient, staff has recommended conditions to ensure compliance.
Relationship to the Natural and Physical Environment:
Buildings shall be: located to preserve existing trees: topography and natural
drainage where possible based upon existing site conditions; located in areas not
subject to ground slumping or sliding; located to provide adequate distance between
adjoining buildings for adequate light, air circulation, and fire-fighting; and oriented
with cons�deration for sun and w�nd. Trees shall be preserved to the extent possible.
Replacement of trees is subject to the requirements of Chapter 18.790, Tree Removal.
The applicant has proposed to retain 88% of the trees on site that are over 12 inches in
diameter. There are no extraordinary physical or natural restraints that would dictate the
placement of the expansion. No buildings or structures are proposed that will hinder air
circulation, or prevent fire-fighting apparatus ,from performing their jobs. The proposed
structures do not exceed the allowed height. This critenon has been met.
Buffering, screening, and compatibility between adjoining uses:
Bufferin� shall be provided between different types of land uses and decreased noise
levels, a�r pollution, v�sual barrier, on site screening of service areas, stora e areas,
parking lots, and mechanical devices on roof tops shall be considered in de�ermining
the intensity of the buffer or screen.
Buffering and screenin� has been addressed elsewhere in this report, and has been
conditioned such that it will meet this criterion.
Crime Prevention and Safety:
. Windows shall be located so that areas vulnerable to crime can be surveyed by
the occupants;
. Interior laundry and service areas shall be located in a way that they can be
observed by others;
TIGARD CHURCH OF GOD EXPANSION PAGE 15 OF 21 CUP2003-00005
7/28/2003 PUBLIC HEARING STAFF REPORT TO THE HEARINGS OFFICER
. Mail boxes shall be located in lighted areas having vehicular or pedestrian
traffic;
. The exterior lighting levels shall be selected and the angles shall be oriented
towards areas vulnerable to crime; and
. Light fixtures shall be provided in areas having heavy pedestrian or vehicular
traffic and in potentially dangerous areas such as parking lots, stairs, ramps
and abrupt grade changes. Fixtures shall be �laced at a height so that light
patterns overlap at a height of seven feet, which is sufficient to illuminate a
person.
The City of Ti�ard Police Department has reviewed this project and has not indicated concern
or objection with the proposal. The crime prevention standards have been satisfied.
Public Transit:
Provisions within the plan shall be included for providing for transit if the development
proposal is adjacent to existing or proposed transit route; the requirements for transit
facilities shall be based on: the location of other transit facilities �n the area; and the
size and tyPe of the proposal. The following facilities may be required after City and
Tri-Met review: bus stop shelters; turnouts for buses; and connecting paths to the
shelters.
There are no transit services adjacent to this site. The nearest stops to this site are located
at SW Hall Blvd. This criterion is satisfied.
D. STREET AND UTILITY IMPROVEMENTS STANDARDS - CHAPTER 18.810
Chapter 18.810 provides construction standards for the implementation of public and
private facilities and utilities such as streets, sewers, and drainage. The applicable
standards are addressed below:
Streets:
Improvements:
Section 18.810.030.A.1 states that streets within a development and streets adjacent
shall be improved in accordance with the TDC standards.
Section 18.810.030.A.2 states that any new street or additional street width planned as
TDCrtion of an existing street shall be dedicated and improved in accordance with the
Minimum Rights-of-Way and Street Widths: Section 18.810.030(E) requires an arterial
street to have a 60 to74 to 122-foot right-of-way width and 12-foot travel lanes. Other
improvements required may include on-street parking, sidewalks and bikeways,
underground utilities, street lighting, storm drainage, and street trees.
This site lies adjacent to SW 98'h Avenue, which is classified as a Neighborhood Route on
the City of Tigard Transportation Plan Map. At present, there is approximately 55 feet of
right-of-way (ROW), according to the most recent tax assessor's map. The applicant has
submitted a copy of a Street Dedication document from 1978 that shows an additional 5 feet
of ROW dedicated to the public. This brings the total ROW along the frontage to 60 feet.
This exceeds the minimum ROW required for a Neighborhood Route.
SW 98th is fully improved except for street trees. The applicant's plan indicates they will
plant street trees according to the required spacing. The applicant has requested that they
be allowed to plant the street trees east of the sidewalk because the existing planter strip is
only 4' wide. The street trees may be planted east of the sidewalk as long as they are at
least 2' away.
TIGARD CHURCH OF GOD EXPANSION PAGE 16 OF 21 CUP2003-00005
7/28/2003 PUBLIC HEARING STAFF REPORT TO THE HEARINGS OFF�CER
Sidewalks: Section 18.810.070.A requires that sidewalks be constructed to meet City
design standards and be located on both sides of arterial, collector and local
residential streets.
There is an existing sidewalk along 98�' Avenue. No sidewalk improvements are required.
Sanitary Sewers:
Sewers Required: Section 18.810.090.A requires that sanitary sewer be installed to
serve each new development and to connect developments to existing mains in
accordance with the provisions set forth in Design and Construction Standards for
Sanitary and SurFace Water Management (as adopted by Clean Water Services in 1996
and including any future revisions or amendments) and the adopted policies of the
comprehensive plan.
Over-sizin�: Section 18.810.090.0 states that proposed sewer systems shall include
consideration of additional development within the area as pro�ected by the
Comprehensive Plan.
The closest sewer line is an 8-inch line in Brentwood Place to the east. The applicanYs plan
shows a sewer lateral from the pro�osed addition connecting to the sewer located in
Brentwood Place. This standard is satisfied.
Storm Drainage:
General Provisions: Section 18.810.100.A states requires developers to make
adequate provisions for storm water and flood water runoff.
Accommodation of Upstream Drainage: Section 18.810.100.0 states that a culvert or
other drainage facility shall be large enough to accommodate potential runoff from its
entire upstream drainage area, whether inside or outside the development. The City
Engineer shall approve the necessary size of the facility, based on the provisions of
Design and Construction Standards for Sanitary and Surface Water Management (as
adopted by Clean Water Services in 2000 and including any future revisions or
amendments).
There are no existing upstream drainage areas that affect this site.
Effect on Downstream Drainage: Section 18.810.100.D states that where it is
anticipated by the City Engineer that the additional runoff resulting from the
development will overload an existing drainage facility, the Director and Engineer shall
withhold approval of the development until provisions have been made for
improvement of the potential condition or until prov�sions have been made for storage
of additional runoff caused by the development in accordance with the Design and
Construction Standards for Sanitary and Surface Water Management (as adopted by
Clean Water Services in 2000 and including any future revisions or amendments).
In 1997, Clean Water Services (CWS) completed a basin study of Fanno Creek and adopted
the Fanno Creek Watershed Management Plan. Section V of that plan includes a
recommendation that local governmenfs institute a stormwater detention/effective impervious
area reduction prog ram resultmg in no net increase in storm peak flows up to the 25-year
event. The City will require that all new developments resulting in an increase of impervious
surfaces provide onsite detention facilities, unless the development is located adjacent to
Fanno Creek. For those developments adjacent to Fanno Creek, the storm water runoff will
be permitted to discharge without detention.
The net new impervious surface area is only 3233 sf. Therefore, detention is not required.
The stormwater runoff from the new impervious surface will be collected in a 4-inch rain drain
that will connect to a 6-inch storm line. The 6-inch line will transmit the flow to a water quality
swale on the south side of the parking lot. The outflow from the swale will connect to the
existing catch basin at the south west comer of the parking lot.
TIGARD CHURCH OF GOD EXPANSION PAGE 17 OF 21 CUP2003-00005
7/28/2003 PUBLIC HEARING STAFF REPORT TO THE HEARINGS OFFICER
Bikeways and Pedestrian Pathways:
Bikeway Extension: Section 18.810.110.A states that developments adjoining
Proposed bikeways identified on the City's adopted pedestrian/bikeway plan shall
incfude provisions for the future extension of such bikeways through the dedication of
easements or right-of-way.
SW 98�' Aven�e is designated as a bicycle facility. There is an existing bikeway along the
east side of 98 Avenue. No additional improvements are warranted.
Utilities:
Section 18.810.120 states that all utility lines, but not limited to those required for
electric, communication, lighting and cable television services and related facilit�es
shall be placed underground, except for surface mounted transformers, surface
mounted connection boxes and meter cabinets which max be placed above �round,
temporary utility service facilities during construction, high capacity electric lines
operating at 50,000 volts or above, and:
. The developer shall make all necessary arrangements with the serving utility to
provide the underg round services;
. The City reserves the right to approve location of all surface mounted facilities;
. All underground utilities, including sanitary sewers and storm drains installed in
streets by the developer, shall be cons�ructed prior to the surfacing of the
streets; and
. Stubs for service connections shall be long enough to avoid disturbing the
street improvements when service connections are made.
Exception to Under-Grounding Requirement: Section 18.810.120.0 states that a
developer shall pay a fee in-lieu of under-grounding costs when the development is
proposed to take place on a street where existing ufilities which are not underground
will serve the development and the approval authority determines that the cost and
technical difficulty of under-grounding the utilities outwei�hs the benefit of under-
grounding in con unction with the development. The determination shall be on a case-
by-case basis. T�e most common, but not the only, such situation is a short frontage
development for which under-grounding would result in the placement of additional
poles, rather than the removal of above-ground utilities facilities. An applicant for a
development which is served by utilities which are not underground and which are
located across a public right-of-way from the applicant's property shall pay a fee in-
lieu of under-grounding.
There are existing overhead utility lines along the frontage of SW 98�' Avenue. If the fee
in-lieu is proposed, it is equal to $27.50 per lineal foot of street frontage that contains the
overhead lines. The frontage along this site is 395 lineal feet; therefore the fee would be
$10,862.00.
ADDITIONAL CITY AND/OR AGENCY CONCERNS WITH STREET AND UTILITY
Public Water S stem: �
is si e is serve y ity of Tigard Water. The applicant indicates the existing water service
is adequate to serve the addition.
Storm Water Qualit :
e iy as agreed to enfo�ce Surface Water Management (SWM) regulations
establisf�ed by Clean Water Services (CWS) Design and Construction Standards
(adopted by Resolution and Order No. 00-7) which require the construction of on-site
water quality facilities. The facilities shall be designed to remove 65 percent of the
phosphorus contained in 100 percent of the storm water runoff generated from newly
created impervious surfaces. In addition, a maintenance plan shall be submitted
indicating the frequency and method to be used in keeping the facility maintained
through the year.
TIGARD CHURCH OF GOD EXPANSION PAGE 18 OF 21 CUP2D03-00005
7/28/2003 PUBLIC HEARING STAFF REPORT TO THE HEARINGS OFFICER
Prior to construction, the applicant shall submit plans and calculations for a water quality
facility that will meet the intent of the CWS Design Standards. In addition, the applicanf shall
submit a maintenance plan for the facility that must be reviewed and approved by the City
prior to construction.
To ensure compliance with Clean Water Services desi n and construction standards, the
applicant shall employ the design engineer responsible �or the design and specifications of
the private water quality facility to perform construction and visual observation of the water
quality facility for compliance with the design and specifications. These inspections shall be
made at significant stages throughout the pro�ect and at completion of the construction. Prior
to final building inspection, the design engineer shall provide the City of Tigard (Inspection
Supervisor) with wntten confirmation that the water quality facility is in compliance with the
design and specifications.
Gradin and Erosion Control:
esig n an ons ruc ion Standards also regulate erosion control to reduce the
amount of-sediment and other pollutants reaching the public storm and surface water
system resulting from development, construction, rading, excavating, clearing, and
any other activi�y which accelerates erosion. Per �WS regulations, fhe app licant is
required to submit an erosion control plan for City review and approvaf pr'�or to
issuance of City permits.
The Federal Clean Water Act requires that a National Pollutant Discharge Elimination
System (NPDES) erosion control permit be issued for any development that will
disturb five or more acres of land. Since this site is over five acres, the developer will
be required to obtain an NPDES permit from the City prior to construction. This permit
will be issued along with the site andlor building permit.
The Buildin Division will review the grading and erosion control plans for this development
as a part of�he site permit review.
E. IMPACT STUDY:
ec ion . . . .e states that the applicant shall provide an impact study to
quantify the effect of development on public facilities and services. For each public
facility system and type of impact, the stud�r shall propose improvements necessary to
meet City standards, and to minimize the impact of the development on the public at
large, public facilities systems, and affected private property users.
In situations where the Community Development Code requires the dedication of real
propertx interests, the applicant shall either specifically concur with a requirement for
public right-of-way dedication, or provide evidence that supports that the real property
dedication is not roughly proportional to the projected impacts of the development.
The applicant has submitted an impact study addressing the required elements above.
ROUGH PROPORTIONALITY ANALYSIS
Based on a transportation impact study prepared by Mr. David Larson for the A-Boy
Expansion/Dolan/Resolution 95-61, TIF's are expected to recapture 32 percent of the traffic
impact of new development. Presently, the TIF for this project is estimated at $5,607.
According to the Washington County TIF ordinance, 32 percent of a projects impacts are met
by its TIF assessment in Tigard. This leaves 68% unmitigated. The actual cost of system
improvements Per trip generated by new development on the Tigard street system can be
determined by the foflowing equation (Larson, Mackenzie Engineenng, Dolan Findings, June
1995): $1,053 divided by .32 equals $3,303.12.
($1,053 is theTlF assessment according to the Washington County TIF ordinance effective
July 1, 2003).
Less miti ated costs
e app icant is not required to make any dedications or improvements outside of what was
proposed.
TIGARD CHURCH OF GOD EXPANSION PAGE 19 OF 21 CUP2003-00005
7/28/2003 PUBLIC HEARING STAFF REPORT TO THE HEARINGS OFFICER
Estimate of Unmiti ated Im acts
umpac ......... ............................................................................ 3,303.12
Less TIF Assessment ...................................................................... 1 053
s ima e o nmi iga e mpac s , . 2
FINDING: Using the above cost factors, it can be determined that there are no
unmi�igated impacts and, therefore, the proposed improvements and imposed
conditions are roughly proportional and justified.
SECTION VIII. OTHER STAFF COMMENTS
The City of Tigard Building Division has reviewed the proposal and stated that the
proximity of the new admin. building to the existing church will require modifications to the
existing church. The modification will entail 1 hr. walls with parapets and possibiy no
openings (doors). The new admin. building will be required to meet all applicable building
codes.
The City of Tigard Engineering Department was sent this proposal for review and the
comments have been incorporated into this report.
The City of Tigard Operations Utility Manager has reviewed this application and has
indicated that all utility work should be coordinated with the City. Sanitary. and Storm are
private. He also indicated that the applicant needs to supplement the existing water meter
with a backflow device. Contact Rich Sattler at the Tigard Water District.
The City of Ti�ard Arborist has reviewed this application and has indicated that the tree
protection fencing was. not shown on the plan as indicated in the arborist report. He also
indicated that the tree inventory and health report were not included in the report. Staff has
recommended that the applicant notify the city s arborist prior to site work so that he can
ensure protection measures are m place and functioning. The trees that would potentially be
affected were shown on the tree planting plan. The city arborist can be reached at (503)
639-4171, ext. 2589
City of Tigard Police Department has reviewed this application and offered no comments
or ob�ections.
SECTION IX. AGENCY COMMENTS
Clean Water Services has reviewed the proposal and indicated that the applicant needs to
adjust the water quality swale as needed to provide required treatment.
Tualatin Valley Fire and Rescue has reviewed this application and has provided the
following comments:
�� FIRE APPARATUS ACCESS ROAD DISTANCE FROM BUILDING AND TURNAROUNDS:
ccess roa s s a e wit in eet o a portions o t e exterior wa o t e irst story o
the building as measured by,an approved route around the exterior of the building. An
approved furnaround is required if the remaining distance to an approved intersecting
roadway, as measured along the fire apparatus access road, is greater than 150 feet. (UFC
Sec. 902.2.1)
z� DEAD END ROADS: Dead end fire apparatus access roads in excess of 150 feet in length
s a e provi e with an approved turnaround. Diagrams of approved turnarounds are
available from the fire district. (UFC Sec. 902.2.2.4)
s> PAINTED CURBS: Where required, fire apparatus access roadway curbs shall be painted
ye ow an mar ed "NO PARKING FIRE LANE" at each 25 feet. Lettermg shall have a
stroke of not less than one inch wide by six inches high. Lettering shall be white on red or
black on yellow background. (UFC Sec. 901.4.5.2)
TIGARD CHURCH OF GOD EXPANSION PAGE 20 OF 21 CUP2003-00005
7l28/2003 PUBLIC HEARING STAFF REPORT TO THE HEARINGS OFFICER
a� COMMERCIAL BUILDINGS - REQUIRED FIRE FLOW: The re�uired fire flow for the
ui ing s a not excee , ga ons per minute or the available GPM in the water
delivery system at 20 psi, whichever is less. A worksheet for calculating the required fire
flow is available from the Fire Marshal's Office. (UFC Sec. 903.3)
s� COMMERCIAL BUILDINGS - FIRE HYDRANTS: No portion of the exterior of a commercial
ui ing s a e ocate more t an eet rom a fire hydrant when measured in an
approved manner around the outside of the building and along an approved fire apParatus
access roadway. Any hydrants that are left over from the minimum number of hydrant
calculations may be full filled by hydrants that are up to 500 feet from any point of the
building. The fire Prevention Ordinance has further requirements that need fo be used for
acceptance and placement of fire hydrants. (UFC Sec. 903.4.2.1)
s) COMMERCIAL BUILDINGS - MINIMUM NUMBER OF FIRE HYDRANTS: The minimum
num er o ire y rants or a ui ing s a e ase on t e require ire ow prior to giving
credit for fire protection systems divided by 1500. If the answer is equal to or greater than
x.5 the next whole number of hydrants shall be used. There shall not be less than 2
hydrants per building. (UFC Sec. 903.4.2.1)
�> Considerations for lacin fire h drants shall be as follows:
. xisting y rants in t e area may e use o meet the required number of hydrants;
however, hydrants that are over 500 feet away from the nearest point of the subject
building shall not contribute to the required number of hydrants. .
. Hydrants that are separated from the subject building by railroad tracks shall not
contnbute to the required number of hydrants.
. Hydrants that are separated from the subject building by divided highway, freeway, or
heavily traveled collector streets shall not contribute to the required number of
hydrants.
. Hydrants that are accessible only by a bridge shall be acceptable to contribute to the
required number of hydrants only if approved by the Chief.
• Private hydrants or public hydrants that are on adjacent private property shall not
contribute to the required number of hydrants for the subject building. �Exce tio_n: The
use of hydrants located on other private property may be considered i t ef h ir locations
and access are encumbered in a legal document (such as deed restriction) by the
owners of the involved parcels of property. The encumbrance may be lifted only after
approvals by the Chief on behalf of the fire department and any other governmental
agencies that may require approval.
. When evaluating the placement of hydrants at apartment or industrial complexes the
first hydrant(s) to be placed shall be at the pnmary access and any secondary access
to the site. �4fter these hydrants have been placed other hydrants shall be sited to
meet the above requirements for spacing and minimum number of hydrants. (UFC
Sec. 903.4.2.1.1)
8. ACCESS AND FIRE FIGHTING WATER SUPPLY DURING CONSTRUCTION: Approved
ire apparatus access roa ways an , ire ig tmg water supp ies s a e installed and
operational prior to any other construction on the site or subdivision. (UFC Sec. 8704)
Portland General Electric, Ti�ard/Tualatin School District, NW Natural Gas, and
Verizon were give e opportunity to review this proposal and submitted no comments or
objections.
���� �� Jul 21 2003
PREPARED BY: Brad Kilby DATE
Associate Planner
,'� ' ' �
�� - � ���- Julv 21, 2003
APPRO ED BY: Richa ewersdorff DATE
Plan ' g Manager
TIGARD CHURCH OF GOD EXPANSION PAGE 21 OF 21 CUP2003-00005
7/28/2003 PUBLIC HEARING STAFF REPORT TO THE HEARINGS OFFICER
. e � • �
i ST
HER G[OGN�VwiC �NF0�4ATiON 9Y6TE4
ty . YICINITY MAP
� � a
� W � Y
Q � O — � � � � � � �
R � Q W CUP2003-00005
KABLE ST � � Q _
S = _ _ _ _ = = —
TIGARD CHURCH OF
GOD EXPANSION
��
��������
��
�
DR
��S�N�.
�� D �
' �� - -
.,
� m FE . - ..��,„
� � � �y »f,�` '` �� h
� � � �;� .., � 'c .
:� �
euu ur,a ;; {`
� � i--T•..._�.9� ar m xo�,rrn _o..
G � ;......... —rr : 2
� ti
� BEEF�N�RD. u,M �q
�^�"` �"�r�
0 � � ,..0 .
D m �., Tiperd Are�M�p .
� � �
� Z
�
� N
a
G e 0 100 200 �00 100 Fset
���'�,� � ,°.azo rse,
Op�
m City of Tigard
RD p�
Infortnafion on thit m�p i�for penenl loe�lan ony�nd
� ��oulC De wdilsd wllh th�D�vslopmsM Ssrviu�Dlvision. I�
�lJ 13725 SW Hdl Blvd '�
� � Tlpud,OR 97Y23 �i,
, U (SD3)639-1171 �I
nttp:/Mww.d.up.rd.or.w
�� Ccmmuniry Development Plot date:Jun 10,2003;C:lmagiclhAAGIC03.APR '
N
� � � �
� � 3
�. � k W � .wrr aWx ,
�� m li
�' — SW 98T" AVENUE 70
� � - , r L �„ti
� D � � „ J.VM d0,yMpy
O � I� I \'`-.. ��� p v R +t� k c 4�` �
N �
y � O svm
� .
... , .,
,,.
� : . . .6.:.t ,�_„� t.v � � ... .... ,�.
�
� .. . .. .. . . . .. �. ,.;._ . ��-:. : :.. ir. ;� - - �,�;�. � L c ��!�,`+
..
� � M — — -�- — — 'o�.. �eL �:�r' ;.d..�.'.C::... ,�# .. �
� -1-1— ._ _ 6 . . ., .x,;y i
' ' Hns�sr�r — — — �- — — -R —
� �t y --�. -�y \ -SJ]dJ tYd'1 .xl,v sOJ �T l.r s/ � -
� � l/0#��'3J. \ _ ���`� �t•t --— JF4 �����
�_� � ,�� �_�� �
_ z�� u x .a `�� !p�:�
Z � ° ' � - , } ,,
°� *- �o` ,5', „� tatio��v �.
�. ,r r'� � ., � �v>� �fens 7H1 �,�:
z urrow a�.
� `[ �t � nyr�� '�R r ' , 'nJSrl X7[w.f `
,{ �i �' CY+ �S
O • w� . ��va..i�.. „�ai«'i' 4 f rw�sr � 8 ,-� k ' " ei
� � �..�
YaL! � sla.n eM r� oo�' 0 1 L
MU LJI.]W� NPHLLO Y ,L'. M.0�+d� f��
v n.v —__—__ � 3a _. e ..
�� E r`
�..a��, °� , ;%:t�;'i�;.. � � � �
� o t'` `` I � y
� 'aaat , � ,' ' I "� � i
` , �t c r z ��x : *�. '� .� � �
_-.' � \ t[xrtM�'/1J<i�'�11iU � ? �
� �` x , k i "" � � �
sw.r r '1� . �_I . �, n
.,r � �/ � I � � � �
.e
�nw yy� i� •�w I � � 8
• � � sv✓7/ J� � �CF .. I� `
i mai o.vn avr�ui�a r � i` .ov v„ � ' �
$� }s:s�avn.r'"a,rMOUw � � �
'a�, I =
Y� ,..w` �� / � I �^»� ^ ^
-a � � 1 ..,,,.,
'__ , ; i , � ° ��
c� �� " ' � � �';
, .�+ � i�' ; � �
� S �• ,,..,�� ,' n,.,.... • s�,.� ..� '�� � ..,. ,.«.°::^,`,;,8 � :� '
v � tM.�., ; .. } '' I �xr wu
°;w ,J°"`,,,,,,. �'- I I N,9d/!N9 9N/1S/X3
..a wr.r auw.v. •<o �r
e'+ .�,..�, ; .�;�,��. '� }�` �g
2 � ^.. ,o- , , -TM„�e.. .t, „csy
Cn r ».. � w. �.sov � R 'n..�� �B
� � �' aw.., ��� 9N/07(n i ; � x i u+.w t.;� ' +, ��i
`1 N r� `:„.. O/1 t'l/1S/N/�M3N �, �l I .'p� �;t, 'a
_ ` _' � a.�s� i�' m�.�.� '_�` ..�i.�9'� � _ —— '
Q � �' , .. . 1'�r.:v \ ��� "� : -
O � ; : •��'l`._�..I/ �ars. � � � � .
�lni
W "'nrs„a.,n."t,. � ::.�'.w� � �r'�""°„I ' • �� K ° R
-n � � .,�..,, _. �- ; �• � , �-,r, �....——�� 3 T
� 0 ,r � ':` � ' r�, t •�
� O ° - ir„��,.,,� i�t � �« � � � u
O .r..wnu H�;tm.
.r� �an� g
v O �Llf �[ !f `�4� � , �1 � �'i.Or '.LK• �{Syy
� °^'wr° P``� a ott/ � � � c'nar / � �� a�
� r x..,� � �� a
\ ..oT,-za�, <. • � ,... � � °.�`
�_ � ,O .,.. �,
a x \ , . � � � ,.o,. ��d
ZI ` .�' '°.�,^,. • , -�
H
�
_
CITY OF TIGARD PLANNING DIVISION �� I -
s�
NOTICE TO MORTGAGEE,LIENHOLDER,VENDOR OR SELLER:
THE TIGARD DEVELOPMENT CODE REQUIRES THAT IF YOU RECEIVE THIS NOTICE,
IT SHALL BE PROMPTLY FORWARDED TO THE PURCHASER.
CtTY OF TIOARD
Community�DeveCapment
C ITY 0 F TI GAR D Sh°�'�A�etterCommunity
PUBLIC HEARING NOTICE
NOTICE IS HEREBY GIVEN THAT THE TIGARD HEARINGS OFFICER, AT A MEETING ON MONDAY,
JULY 28, 2003 AT 7:00 PM, IN THE TOWN HALL OF THE TIGARD CIVIC CENTER AT 13125 SW HALL
BOULEVARD, TIGARD, OREGON 97223 WILL CONSIDER THE FOLLOWING APPLICATION:
FILE NO.: CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT (CUP) 2003-00005
FILE TITLE: TIGARD CHURCH OF GOD EXPANSION
APPLICANT: Zaik/Miller Associates OWNER: Tigard Church of God
Attn: Jackie Root Attn: Bruce Plunkett
2340 NW Thurman Street, Suite 201 15670 SW 98th Avenue
Portland, OR 97210 Tigard, OR 97224
REQUEST: The applicant is seeking Conditional Use approval to expand the existing facility by
2,875 square feet for administrative offices and classrooms, and make site
modifications to the parking and landscaped areas.
LOCATION: 15670 SW 98�' Avenue; WCTM 2S111 CD, Tax Lot 300.
ZONE: R-7: Medium-Density Residential District. The R-7 zoning district is designed to
accommodate attached single-family homes, detached single-family homes with
or without accessory residential units, at a minimum lot size of 5,000 square feet,
and duplexes, at a minimum lot size of 10,000 square feet. Mobile home parks
and subdivisions are also permitted outright. Religious Institutions, some civic,
and institutional uses are also permitted conditionally.
APPLICABLE
REVIEW
CRITERIA: Community Development Code Chapters: 18.330, 18.360, 18.390, 18.510, 18.705,
18.725, 18.745, 18.755, 18.765, 18.780, 18.790, 18.795 and 18.810.
THE PUBLIC HEARING ON THIS MATTER WILL BE CONDUCTED IN ACCORDANCE WITH THE RULES OF
CHAPTER 18.390 OF THE COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT CODE AND RULES OF PROCEDURES ADOPTED BY
THE TIGARD CITY COUNCIL AND AVAILABLE AT CITY HALL.
ASSISTIVE LISTENING DEVICES ARE AVAILABLE FOR PERSONS WITH IMPAIRED HEARING. THE CITY WILL
ALSO ENDEAVOR TO ARRANGE FOR QUALIFIED SIGN LANGUAGE INTERPRETERS AND QUALIFIED
BILINGUAL INTERPRETERS UPON REQUEST. PLEASE CALL (503) 639-4171, EXT. 2438 (VOICE) OR (503)
684-2772 (TDD - TELECOMMUNICATIONS DEVICES FOR THE DEAF) NO LESS THAN ONE WEEK PRIOR TO
THE HEARING TO MAKE ARRANGEMENTS.
ANYONE WISHING TO PRESENT WRITTEN TESTIMONY ON THIS PROPOSED ACTION MAY DO SO IN
WRITING PRIOR TO OR AT THE PUBLIC HEARING. ORAL TESTIMONY MAY BE PRESENTED AT THE PUBLIC
HEARING. AT THE PUBLIC HEARING, THE HEARINGS OFFICER WILL RECEIVE A STAFF REPORT
PRESENTATION FROM THE CITY PLANNER, OPEN THE PUBLIC HEARING, AND INVITE BOTH ORAL AND
WRITTEN TESTIMONY. THE HEARINGS OFFICER MAY CONTINUE THE PUBLIC HEARING TO ANOTHER
MEETING TO OBTAIN ADDITIONAL INFORMATION OR CLOSE THE PUBLIC HEARING AND TAKE ACTION ON
THE APPLICATION.
IF A PERSON SUBMITS EVIDENCE IN SUPPORT TO THE APPLICATION LESS THAN SEVEN (7) DAYS PRIOR
TO THE PUBLIC HEARING, ANY PARTY IS ENTITLED TO REQUEST A CONTINUANCE OF THE HEARING. IF
THERE IS NO CONTINUANCE GRANTED AT THE HEARING, ANY PARTICIPANT IN THE HEARING MAY
REQUEST THAT THE RECORD REMAIN OPEN FOR AT LEAST SEVEN (7) DAYS AFTER THE HEARING. A
REQUEST THAT THE RECORD REMAIN OPEN CAN BE MADE ONLY AT THE FIRST EVIDENTIARY HEARING
(ORS 197.763(6).
INCLUDED IN THIS NOTICE IS A LIST OF APPROVAL CRITERIA APPLICABLE TO THE REQUEST FROM THE
TIGARD COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT CODE AND THE TIGARD COMPREHENSIVE PLAN. APPROVAL OR
DISAPPROVAL OF THE REQUEST BY THE HEARINGS OFFICER WILL BE BASED UPON THESE CRITERIA AND
THESE CRITERIA ONLY. AT THE HEARING IT IS IMPORTANT THAT COMMENTS RELATING TO THE
REQUEST PERTAIN SPECIFICALLY TO THE APPLICABLE CRITERIA LISTED.
FAILURE TO RAISE AN ISSUE IN PERSON OR BY LETTER AT SOME POINT PRIOR TO THE CLOSE OF THE
HEARING ON THE REQUEST ACCOMPANIED BY STATEMENTS OR EVIDENCE SUFFICIENT TO ALLOW THE
HEARINGS AUTHORITY AN OPORTUNITY TO RESPOND TO THE ISSUE PRECLUDES AN APPEAL TO THE
LAND USE BOARD OF APPEALS BASED ON THAT ISSUE.
ALL DOCUMENTS AND APPLICABLE CRITERIA IN THE ABOVE-NOTED FILE ARE AVAILABLE FOR
INSPECTION AT NO COST OR COPIES CAN BE OBTAINED FOR TWENTY-FIVE CENTS (25G) PER PAGE, OR
THE CURRENT RATE CHARGED FOR COPIES AT THE TIME OF THE REQUEST. AT LEAST SEVEN (7) DAYS
PR10R TO THE HEARING, A COPY OF THE STAFF REPORT WILL BE AVAILABLE FOR INSPECTION AT NO
COST, OR A COPY CAN BE OBTAINED FOR TWENTY-FIVE CENTS (254) PER PAGE, OR THE CURRENT RATE
CHARGED FOR COPIES AT THE TIME OF THE REQUEST.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION PLEASE CONTACT THE STAFF PLANNER BRAD KILBY AT (503)
639-4171, TIGARD CITY HALL, 13125 SW HALL BOULEVARD, TIGARD, OREGON 97223, OR BY E-MAIL AT
bradley@ci.tigard.or.us.
ST �
HER ......................�.�.
YICINITY MAP
o v
� w
'a 8 =_==_=__
; � CUP2003-00005
ST 5� —__=____
TIGARD CHURCH OF
GOD EXPANSION
DR
�
�y
� � -�
�
� m �
m A
z ! $ i ^
c � x --
A �, �° -w
N � � P.
m \\ �......
x
0
N
�
V �...�
� naeu
�
Ciry o(TipW
RD
r «or..-+......sr
..w�.�+�ro-...
. � ��ywa�nm
V roua�+�n
w....n.r+.�
p�y� PlolOate:Jun 10,2007;C:hWkVMG�C�3
• • � • ' • • � • • � � .
\ � ,
. \
� ► � � �
�
♦ � � -_
' ° HEARINGS OFFICER
...�
" ���.��,. MONDAY-JULY 28, 2003 - 7:00 PM :q;; � -
Assistive Listening Devices are available for persons with impaired hearing and should be scheduled for Hearings Officer meetings by noon on
the Friday prior to the meeting. Please call 503-639-4171, Ext. 2438 (voice) or 503-6842772 (TDD - Teleoommunications Devices for the
Deafl. Upon request, the Ciry will also endeavor to arrange for qualified sign language iMerpreters for persons with speech or hearing
impairments and qualfied bilingual irrterpreters.
Since these services must be scheduled with outside service providers, it is important to allow as much lead time as possible.
To request such services, please notify the City of Tigard of your need(s) by 5:00 p.m., no less than one (1)week prior to the
meeting date at the same phone numbers listed above so that we can make the appropriate arrangements.
Hearings are held in Town Hall at the City of Tigard at 13125 SW Hall Boulevard
Staff reports are available to the public 7 days prior to the hearing date
1. CALL TO ORDER
2. PUBLIC HEARING
2.1 TIGARD CHURCH OF GOD EXPANSION
CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT (CUP) 2003-00005
The applicant is seeking Conditional Use approval to expand the existing facility by 2,875 square feet for
administrative offices and classrooms, and make site modifications to the parking and landscaped
areas.
LOCATION: 15670 SW 98"'Avenue; WCTM 2S111 CD, Tax Lot 300.
R-7: Medium-Density Residential District. The R-7 zoning district is designed to accommodate attached
single-family homes, detached single-family homes with or without accessory residential units, at a
minimum lot size of 5,000 square feet, and duplexes, at a minimum lot size of 10,000 square feet.
Mobile home parks and subdivisions are also permitted outright. Religious Institutions, some civic, and
institutional uses are also permitted conditionally. APPLICABLE REVIEW CRITERIA: Community
Development Code Chapters: 18.330, 18.360, 18.390, 18.510, 18.705, 18.725, 18.745, 18.755, 18.765,
18.780, 18.790, 18.795 and 18.810.
(Continued Below)
Page 1 of 2
ANGE
: - .�.
2.2 BONITA PARK
CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT(CUP) 2003-00006
SENSITIVE LANDS REVIEW(SLR) 2003-00008
The City of Tigard is seeking Conditional Use approval to construct and equip a neighborhood park on
approximately 5.5 acres located within the I-L zoning classification. The City is also seeking Sensitive
Lands Review app�oval to allow work within the 100-year floodplain and adjacent to Fanno Creek, and
its associated wetlands.
LOCATION: The subject site is located on the northwest corner of SW Bonita Road and SW Milton Court;
WCTM 2S112BA, Tax Lot 6200.
ZONE: I-L: Light Industrial District. The I-L zoning district provides appropriate locations for general
industrial uses including industrial service, manufacturing and production, research and development,
warehousing and freight movement, and wholesale sales activities with few, if any, nuisance
characteristics such as noise, glare, odor, and vibration. APPLICABLE REVIEW CRITERIA: Community
Deve►opment Code Chapters 18.330, 18.390, 18.530, 18.705, 18.725, 18.755, 18.765, 18.775, 18.780,
18.790, 18.795 and 18.810.
3. OTHER BUSINESS
4. ADJOURNMENT
Page 2 of 2
Agenda Item: 2.1
Hearin Date: Jul 28 2003
STAFF REPORT TO THE
HEARINGS OFFICER CITYOfTIGARD
Community�UeveCopment
FOR THE CITY OF TIGARD, OREGON S��naA�etter�otnn=Ut=t�
120 DAYS = 10/4/2003
SECTION I. APPLICATION SUMMARY
FILE NAME: TIGARD CHURCH OF GOD EXPANSION
CASE NO: Conditional Use Permit (CUP) CUP2003-00005
OWNER: Tigard Church of God
Attn: Bruce Plunkett
15670 SW 98th Avenue
Tigard, OR 97224
APPLICANT: Zaik/Miller Associates
Attn: Jackie Root
2340 NW Thurman Street, Suite 201
Portland, OR 97210
PROPOSAL: The applicant is seeking Conditional Use Approval to expand the facility
by 2,875 square feet for administrative offices and classrooms, and make
site modifications to the parking and landscaped areas.
LOCATION: 15670 SW 98�' Avenue; WCTM 2S111CD, Tax Lot 300.
COMPREHENSIVE
PLAN and
ZONING
DESIGNATION: Medium-Density Residential; R-7: Religious Institutions and other civic
uses are permitted conditionally in the R-7 zoning district.
APPLICABLE
REVIEW
CRITERIA: Community Development Code Chapters 18.330, 18.360, 18.390, 18.510,
18.705, 18.725, 18.745, 18.755, 18.765, 18.780, 18.790, 18.795 and
18.810.
SECTION II. STAFF RECOMMENDATION
Staff recommends that the Hearings Officer find that the proposed Conditional Use Permit will
not adversely affect the health, safety and welfare of the City and meets the Approval
Standards as outlined in this report. Therefore, Staff recommends APPROVAL, subject to the
following recommended Conditions of Approval:
TIGARD CHURCH OF GOD EXPANSION PAGE 1 OF 21 CUP2003--00005
7/28l2003 PUBLIC HEARING STAFF REPORT TO THE HEARINGS OFFICER
CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL
THE FOLLOWING CONDITIONS SHALL BE SATISFIED
PRIOR TO ISSUANCE OF THE SITE AND/OR BUILDING PERMITS:
u mit to t e ann�ng epartment ra i y, 7 , ext. or review an
approval:
1. Prior to site work, the applicant shall revise the parking plan to include one (1)
off-street loading space: Said space shall be designed and constructed to meet the
dimensional criteria in Tigard Development Code (TDC) Section 18.765.080(B).
2. The applicant shall comply with the tree protection measures prescribed by the
consul�ing arborist.
3. The applicant shall provide the .city arborist with a construction sequence including
installation and removal of tree protection devices, clearing, grading, and paving.
4. The applicant shall notify the city arborist when tree protection measures are in place
so that he may verify that the measures will function properly prior to construction.
5. The applicant shall revise the site plan to indicate the manner in which crossin s of
the traffic aisles will be identified in compliance with TDC Section 18.705.030(F)(3�.
6. Prior to the issuance of building permits, the applicant shall revise the plans to include
provisions for a six-foot wall around the trash enclosure.
7. Prior to the issuance of building permits, the applicant shall submit a revised site plan
that shows that all access aisles, parking spaces, and direction of flow are clearly
identified and marked as part of the parking lot striping.
8. Prior to the issuance of building permits, the applicant shall revise the parking plan to
accommodate 8 bicycle-parking spaces. Said spaces must be designed and
constructed to the standards that are identified in TDC Section 18.765.050.
Submit to the Engineering Department (Kim McMillan, 639-4171, ext. 2642) for review
and approval:
9. A Public Facility Improvement (PFI) permit is required for this project to cover the street
trees and any other work in the public nght-of-way. Six (6 sets of detailed public
improvement plans shall be submitted for review to the �ngineering Department.
NOTE: these plans are in addition to any drawings required by the Buildm Division and
should only include sheets relevant to public improvements. �ublic Facility
Improvement (PFI) permit plans shall conform to City of Tigard Public Improvement
Design Standards, which are available at City Hall and the City's web page
(www.ci.tiqard.or.us).
10. The PFI permit plan submittal shall include the exact legal name, address and telephone
number of the individual or corporate entity w�71 be designated as the "Permittee",
and who will provide the financial assurance for the public improvements. For example,
specify if the entity is a corporation, limited partnership, LLC, etc. Also specify the state
within which the entity is incorporated and provide the name of the corporate contact
person. Failure to provide accurate information to the Engineering Department will
delay processing of project documents.
11. Th� applicant's construction plans shall show planting of street trees on the east side of
98 Avenue.
12. The applicant shall provide connection of proposed addition to the public sanitary
sewerage system. A connection permit is required to connect to the existing public
sanitary sewer system.
TIGARO CHURCH OF GOD EXPANSION PAGE 2 OF 21 CUP2003-00005
7/28✓2003 PUBLIC HEARING STAFF REPORT TO THE HEARINGS OFFICER
13. The applicant shall provide an on-site water uality facility as required by Clean Water
Services Design and Construction Standards�adopted by Resolution and Order No. 00-
7). Final plans and calculations shall be submitted to the Engineering Department (Kim
McMillan) for review and approval prior to issuance of the site permit. In addition, a
proposed maintenance plan shall be submitted along with the plans and calculations for
review and approval.
14. An erosion control plan shall be provided as part of the Public Facility Improvement
(PFI} permit drawings. The plan shall conform to the "Erosion Prevention and Sediment
Control Design and Planning Manual, December 2000 edition."
THE FOLLOWING CONDITIONS SHALL BE SATISFIED
PRIOR TO A FINAL BUILDING INSPECTI�N:
u mit to t e ngineering epartment im c i an, 7 , ext. or rev�ew
and approval:
15. Prior to a final building inspection, the applicant shall complete any work in the public
right-of-way (or public easement) and obtain approval from the Engineering Department.
16. The applicant shall either place the existing overhead utility lines alon SW 98`h Avenue
underground as a part of this project, or they shall pay the fee in-lieu o�undergrounding.
The fee shall be calculated by the frontage of the site that is parallel to the utility lines
and will be $27.50 per lineal foot. If the fee. option is chosen, the amount will be
$10,862.00 and it shall be paid prior to a final building inspection
17. Prior to final buildin� inspection, the applicant shall pay the fee in-lieu of constructing an
on-site water quantity facility. The fee is based on the total area of new impervious
surfaces in the proposed development.
18. To ensure compliance with Clean Water Services design and construction standards,
the applicant shall employ the design engineer responsible for the design and
specifications of the private water quality facility to perform construction and visual
observation of the water quality facility for compliance with the design and
specifications. These inspections shall be made at significant stages, and at
completion of the construction. Prior to final building inspection, the design engineer
shall provide the City of Tigard (Inspection Supervisor) with written confirmation that
the water quality facility is in compliance with the design and specifications. Staff
Contact: Hap Watkins, Building Division.
FAILURE TO SATISFY THE CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL WITHIN 18 MONTHS
OF THE EFFECTIVE DATE OF THE HEARINGS OFFICER'S DECISION
SHALL RENDER THE HEARINGS OFFICER'S DECISION VOID.
SECTIDN II1. BACKGROUND INFORMATION
Site Historv:
The site was rezoned in 1975 for the Church of Christ, and subsequent approval of
SDR18-76 permitted the construction of the facility. The Tigard Church of God received
conditional use approval in 1977 under CU14-77 and SDR 34-77 to expand the facility. The
Church received approval in 1980 under CU20-80 to utilize a single-family residence on site
to hold bible study.
Vicinity Information:
The site is surrounded by property zoned for and developed with a mixture of residential
densities. The Southwest Church of Christ is directly south of this site.
TIGARD CHURCH OF GOD EXPANSION PAGE 3 OF 21 CUP2003-00005
7/28/2003 PUBLIC HEARING STAFF REPORT TO THE HEARINGS OFFICER
Site Information and Pro osal Descri tion:
e site is current y eve ope wit t e existing church. The current proposal involves a
2,875 square foot expansion for classrooms and administrative offices. The applicant is not
proposing to modify the existing sanctuary.
SECTION IV. DECISION MAKING PROCEDURES, PERMITS AND USE
Use Classification: Section 18.130.020
is s e se a egories.
The applicant is proPosing to amend the existing conditional use permit to allow for expansion
of an existing church by 2,875 square feet. Churches are permitted by Conditional Use m all
zones. Conditional Use applications are subject to a public hearing before the City of Tigard
Hearings Officer.
Summa Land Use Permits: Chapter 18.310
e ines e ecision-ma ing type to which the land-use application is assigned.
The proposed amendment to the existing Conditional Use permit is a Type III-HO decision.
SECTION V. NEIGHBORHOOD COMMENTS
The Tigard Community Development Code requires that property owners within 500
feet of the subject site be notified of the proposal, and be given an opportunity for
written comments and/or oral testimony prior to a decision being made. In addition,
the applicant is required to post the site with notice of the public hearing.
Notice of the application was mailed and staff has verified that the site was posted. To date,
staff has not received any letters in support or against the proposal.
SECTION VI. SUMMARY OF APPLICABLE CRITERIA
A summary of the applicable criteria in this case, in the Chapter order in which they are
addressed in this reporE are as fotlows:
A. S ecific Conditional Use Criteria
enera p rova ri eria
Additional onditions of A proval)
B. licable Develo mentpCode Standards
on i iona ses
18.360 Site Development Review)
18.510 Residential Zoning)
18.705 Access, Egress & Circulation)
18.725 Environmental Performance Standards)
18.745 Landscaping and Screening)
18.755 Mixed Solid Waste & Recycfable Storage)
18.765 Off-Street Parking and Loading Requirements)
18.780 signs)
18.790 Tree Removal)
18.795 Visual Clearance}
C. Additional Site Develo ment Review A roval Standards
D. ree an i i m rovemen an ar s
E. m ac u
TIGARD CHURCH OF GOD EXPANSION PAGE 4 OF 21 CUP2003-00005
7/28/2003 PUBLIC HEARING STAFF REPORT TO THE HEARINGS OFFICER
SECTION VII. APPLICABLE REVIEW CRITERIA AND FINDINGS
A. SPECIFIC CONDITIONAL USE APPROVAL CRITERIA
Section 18.330.010.A states that the purpose of this chapter is to provide standards
and procedures under which a conditional use may be permitted, enlarged or altered if
the site is apPropriate and if other appropriate conditions of approval can be met.
There are certain uses which due to the nature of the impacts on surrounding land
uses and public facilities require a case-by-case review and analysis.
Section 18.330.020.A states that a request for approval for a new conditional use shall
be processed as a Type III-HO procedure, as regulated by Chapter 18.390.050, using
approval criteria contained in Section 18.330.030A and subject to other requirements
in Chapter 18.330.
General A roval Criteria for a Conditional Use: Section 18.330.030:
e si e size an imens�ons provi e a equa e area or e nee s of the proposed use;
According to the Washington County Assessor's Office, the existing site size is 2.77 acres.
This report evaluates the proposal and necessary applicable code requirements, and as
conditioned, the site size is adequate for the needs of the proposed 2,875 square foot
expansion.
The characteristics of the site are suitable for the proposed use considering size, shape,
location, topography, and natural features;
There are no apparent natural features on this site, and the size, shape, and location are not
e�raordinary. As discussed in this report, the site appears suitable for the proposed
development.
All required public facilities have adequate capacity to serve the proposal; and
The site is already served by all required public facilities. According to the comments received,
all public facilities have adequate capacity to serve the site.
The applicable requirements of the zoning district are met except as modifed by this
chapter.
The following table provides the dimensional standards in the R-7 zone, the additional
dimensional requirements for religious facilities are specified in the Conditional Use Standards
of Section 18.330.050.B.9 and the dimensions proposed for this development.
STANDARD R-7 CONDITIONAL USE PROPOSED
REQUIREMENT
Minimum Lot Size 5,000 sq.ft. 20,000 sq.ft 120,744 sq.ft
Minimum Lot Width 50 ft. — 395.6ft
Minimum Setbacks
Front yard 15 ft 25 ft 74 it
Side facing sVeet on comer&through lots 10 ft 20 ft NlA
Side yard 5 ft 20 ft 144/51 ft
Rear yard 15 ft 20 ft 85 R
Maximum Height 35 ft. Varies 22ft.
Maximum Site Coverage[2] 80°/a 67•h[2]
Minimum Landscape Requirement 20% 33•/.
[2J Includes all buildings and impenrious surfaces.
As identified in the table above, the applicant's plans show that the dimensional standards for
the base zone and Conditional Use sfandards are met.
TIGARD CHURCH OF GOD EXPANSION PAGE 5 OF 21 CUP2003-00005
7/28/2003 PUBLIC HEARING STAFF REPORT TO THE HEARINGS OFFICER
The suQplementary requirements set forth in other chapters of this Code including but
not limited to Chapter 18.780, Signs, and Chapter 18.360, Site Development Review, if
applicable, are met or can be conditioned to be satisfied.
The applicable review criteria in this case include the following chapters of the Community
Development Code: 18.330, Conditional Use; 18.360, Site Development Review; 18.390,
Decision Makmg Procedures; 18.510, Residential Zonin Districts; 18.705, Access, Egress and
Circulation; 18.725, Environmental PerFormance S�andards; 18.745, Landscapmg and
Screening; 18.755, Mixed Solid Waste and Recyclables Storage; 18.765, Off-Street Parking;
18.780, Signs; 18.790, Tree Removal; 18.795, Visual Clearance Areas; and 18.810, Street and
Utility Improvement Standards. The development standards and requirements of these
chapters are addressed further in this report.
The proposal contains no elements related to the provisions of the following chapters:
Variances and Adjustments; 18.390, 18.600, Community Plan Area Standards; 18.710,
Accessory Residential Units; 18.715, Density Computations; 18.720, Design Compatibility
Standards; 18.730, Exceptions to Development Standard; 18.740, Historic Overlay; 18.74�,
Home Occupations; 18.750, Manufactured/Mobile Home Regulations; 18.760, Nonconforming
Situations; 18.775, Sensitive Lands; 18.785, Temporary Uses; and 18.798, Wireless
Communications Facilities. These chapters are, therefore, found to be inapplicable as
approval standards.
The use will comply with the applicable policies of the Comprehensive Plan.
The Comprehensive Plan is implemented by the Community Development Code. Compliance
with Comprehensive Plan policies are, therefore, assured by satisfaction of the applicable
development standards of the development code as addressed within this report.
FINDING: Based on the analysis above, the General Approval Criteria for a Conditional Use
have been satisfied.
Additional Conditions of A roval for Conditional Use.
ec ion . . s a es a e earings u ori y may impose conditions on the
approval of a conditional use, which are found necessary to ensure the use is
compatible with other uses in the vicinity, and that the impact of the proposed use on
the surrounding uses and public facilities is minimized. These conditions may
include, but are not limited to the following:
Limiting the hours, days, place and/or manner of operation;
The majority of activities for the Church occur on weekends and evenings. A search of the
city's code enforcement records shows no complaints against the existing church operations.
Staff finds no reason or circumstance to impose condifions limiting the hours, days, and/or
manner of operation.
Requiring design features, which minimize environmental impacts such as noise,
vibration, air pollution, glare, odor and/or dust;
The hazards related to odor, dust, noise, glare, air pollution, and vibration can be mitigated
through the design of the building and the buffering and landscaping of the use that has been
proposed as conditions of approval. Those hazards that are inherent during construction will
be held to the same standards as other construction within the City of Tigard as regulated by
the Tigard Municipal Code (TMC). All of these items will be sub�ec{ to local and state
enforcement review if the applicant exceeds the allowed levels.
Requiring additional setback areas, lot area, andlor lot depth or width;
The buffer requirements are discussed further in this report.
Limiting the building height, size or lot coverage, and/or location on the site;
TIGARD CHURCH OF GOD EXPANSION PAGE 6 OF 21 CUP2003-00005
7/28/2003 PUBLIC HEARING STAFF REPORT TO THE HEARINGS OFFICER
Based on the plans submitted, the applicant has designed and placed the building such that
it meets the underlying zone requirements, as well as, the additional requiremenfs imposed
on conditional uses.
Designating the size, number, location and/or design of vehicle access points;
The applicant is proposing to utilize the finro existing accesses off of SW 98th Avenue. There
are no new accesses proposed or required for this addition.
Requiring street right-of-way to be dedicated and street(s) to be improved;
Although there are no required street dedications, the applicant will be required to plant street
trees along the frontage to complete the street improvements. Street trees specifics have
been addressed later in this report.
Requiring landscaping, screening, drainage andlor surFacing of parking and loading
areas;
The applicant has proposed to restripe the parking lot and add some new trees and
vegetation to screen the parking area and blend the new building with the existing church.
These items are discussed in more detail later in this discussion.
Limiting the number, size, location, height and/or lighting of signs;
There are no new signs proposed with this expansion.
Limiting or setting standards for the location and/or intensity of outdoor lighting;
Lighting is addressed later in this report.
Re4uiring berms, screening or landscaping and the establishment of standards for
their installation and maintenance;
There is no evidence in the record to suggest that this particular proposal would trigger a
need for any additional berming, screer�ng and or landscaping. The facility is already
partially screened by a berm alo.ng SW 98t Avenue. This criterion is met.
Requiring and designating the size, height, location and/or materials for fences;
The applicant has not proposed any new fencing, and there is no requirement to provide
additional fencing for this project. This criterion is satisfied.
Requiring the protection and preservation of existing trees, soils, vegetation,
watercourses, habitat areas and/or drainage areas;
The applicant has provided a tree preservation plan that will be discussed further in this
report. There are no watercourses, habitat areas, dramage areas, or vegetation other than
domesticated that will be affected by this proposal.
Requiring the dedication of sufficient open land area for a greenway adjoining.and
with�n the floodplain when land form alterations and development are allowed within
the 100-year floodplain; and
This development is not adjacent to the 100-year floodplain; therefore, a condition is not
necessary.
Requiring the, construction of a pedestrian/bicycle pathway within the floodplain in
accordance with the adopted pedestrian/bicycle pathway plan.
This development is not adjacent to the 100-year floodplain, therefore, a condition is not
necessary.
TIGARD CHURCH OF GOD EXPANSION PAGE 7 OF 21 CUP2003-00005
7/28/2003 PUBLIC HEARING STAFF REPORT TO THE HEARINGS OFFICER
B. APPLICABLE DEVELOPMENT CODE STANDARDS
Site Develo ment Review — Cha ter 18.360:
e i e eve opmen eview approva s andards require that a development proposal be
found to be consistent with the various standards of the Community Development Code. The
proposal's consistency with these Code Chapters is reviewed in the following sections.
Residential Zonin Districts — Cha ter 18.510:
e resi en ia zoning is ric eve opmen s andards are discussed previously in this report
under the Conditional Use standards. It should be noted that Religious Institutions are
permitted conditionally in all residential zones.
Access E ress and Circulation -Cha ter 18.705:
ec ion . . . . s a es a an access report shall be submitted with all new
development proposals which verifies design of driveways and streets are safe by
meeting adequate stacking needs, sight distance and deceferation standards as set by
ODOT, Washington County, the City and AASHTO.
The proposed addition to this facility is to provide office space for current staff members.
The applicant has indicated that the addition wi�l not generate new trips to the church site.
There are two existing driveways that access 98 Avenue and the applicant is not proposing
any changes to these driveways.
Section 18.705.030.H.2 states that driveways shall not be permitted to be placed in the
influence area of collector or arterial street intersections. Influence area of
intersections is that area where queues of traffic commonly form on approach to an
intersection. The minimum driveway setback from a collector or arterial street
intersection shall be150 feet, measured from the right-of-way line of the intersecting
street to the throat of the proposed driveway. The setback may,be greater depending
upon the influence area, as determined from City Engineer review of a traffic impac�t
report submitted by the ap plicant's traffic engineer. In a case where a roject has less
than 150 feet of street frontage, the applicant must explore any op�ion for shared
access with the adjacent parcel. If shared access is not possible or practical, the
driveway shall be placed as far from the intersection as possible.
The existing driveways are not located within the influence area of collector or arterial streets.
Section 18.705.030.H.3 and 4 states that the minimum spacing of driveways and
streets along a collector shall be 200 feet. The minimum sQac�ng of driveways and
streets along an arterial shall be 600 feet. The minimum spacing of local streets along
a local street shall be 125 feet.
The existing driveways are located along 98�' Avenue, which is designated as a
Neighborhood Route.
Public Street Access:
All vehicular access and egress as required in Sections 18.705.030(H) and
18.705.030(I) shall connect directly with a public or private street approved by the city
for public use and shall be maintained at the required standards on a continuous
basis;
The applicant has existing access to SW 98th Avenue, which is a public street. This criterion
is satisfied.
Walkways:
On-site pedestrian walkways shall comply with the following standards: Walkways
shall extend from the ground floor entrances or from the �round floor landing of stairs,
ramps, or elevators of all commercial, institutional, and �ndustrial uses, to the streets
which provide the required access and egress. Walkways shall provide convenient
connections between buildings in multi-building commercial, institutional, and
industrial complexes. Unless impractical, walkways shall be constructed between
new and existing developments and neighboring developments;
TIGARD CHURCH OF GOD EXPANSION PAGE 8 OF 21 CUP2003-00005
7/28/2003 PUBLIC HEARING STAFF REPORT TO THE HEARINGS OFFICER
The existing facility already has designated walkways to SW 98th Avenue and the applicant
has indicated in the narrative that the sidewalk will provide connectivity to this sidewalk as
required. This criterion is satisfied.
Wherever required walkways cross vehicle access driveways or parking lots, such
crossings shall be designed and located for pedestrian safety. Required walkways
shall be physically separated from motor vehicle traffic and parking by either a
minimum 6-inch vertical separation (curbed) or a minimum 3-foot horizontal
separation, except that pedestrian crossings of traffic aisles are permitted for
distances no greater than 36 feet if appropriate landscaping, pavement markings, or
contrasting pavement materials are used. Walkways shall be a minimum of four feet in
width, exclusive of vehicle overhangs and obstructions such as mailboxes, benches,
bicycle racks, and sign posts, and shall be in compliance with ADA standards; and
The walkways have been identified on the site plan. All existing walkways are five feet in
width. No proposed walkway is less than 5-feet in width. All proposed walkways across
traffic aisles are less than 36 feet in length, but it has not been determined how those
crossings will be identified. The applicant may propose to mark the crossing at the same
time that the parking lot is restriped. This criterion is not satisfied.
FINDING: The application fails to identify by which means the parking lot crossings will be
identified.
CONDITION:The applicant shall revise the site plan to .indicate the manner in which
crossin s of the tfaffic aisles will be identified in compliance with TDC Section
18.705�30(F)(3).
Required walkwa�rs shall be paved with hard surfaced materials such as concrete,
asphalt, stone, brick, etc. Walkways may be required to be lighted and/or signed as
needed for safety purposes. Soft-surfaced public use pathways may be provided only
if such pathways are provided in addition to required pathways.
The applicant indicates that the new sidewalks will be constructed of concrete. This criterion
has been satisfied.
Minimum Access Requirements for Commercial and Industrial Use:
Section 18.705.030.1 provides the minimum access requirements for commercial and
industrial uses: Table 18.705.3 indicates that the required access width for
developments with more than 100 parking spaces is two 30-foot-wide accesses with a
24-foot pavement width or one 50-foot wide access with 40-feet of pavement.
The TDC Table 18.705.3 requires a minimum of two, 30-foot accesses with 24-feet of
pavement, or one 50-foot access with 40-feet of pavement. The existing development satisfies
this standard by already providing two 30-foot accesses with pavement widths of 24-feet. This
criterion is satisfied.
Environmental PerFormance Standards—Cha ter 18.725:
equires a e era an s a e environmen a aws, ru es and regulations be applied to
development within the City of Tigard. Section 18.725.030 Performance Standards
regulates: Noise, visible emissions, vibration and odors.
Noise. For the purposes of noise regulation, the provisions of Sections 7.41.130
r��F ougFi 7.40.210 of the Tigard Municipal Code shall apply.
Visible Emissions. Within the Commercial zoning districts and the Industrial Park I-P)
zon�ng is ric , ere shall be no use, operation or activity which results in a stac or
other point- source emission, other than an emission from space heating, or the
emission of pure uncombined water (steam) which is visible from a roperty line.
DePartment of Environmental Quality (DEQ) rules for visible emissions (3�0-21-015 and
340-28-070) apply.
TIGARD CHURCH OF GOD EXPANSION PAGE 9 OF 21 CUP2003-00005
7l28/2003 PUBLIC HEARING STAFF REPORT TO THE HEARINGS OFFICER
Vibration. No vibration other than that caused by highway vehicles, trains and aircraft is
permi� e�fc in any given zoning district, which is discernible without instruments at the
property line of the use concerned.
Odors. The emissions of odorous gases or other matter in such quantities as to be
rea�c iry detectable at any point beyond the property line of the use creating the odors is
prohibited. DEQ rules for odors (340-028-090) apply.
Glare and heat. No direct or sky reflected glare, whether from floodlights or from high
e�pa u�ocesses such as combustion or weldin�, which is visible at the lot line
shall be permitted, and; 1) there shall be no emission or transmission of heat or
heated air which is discernible at the lot line of the source; and 2) these regulations
shall not apply to signs or floodli�hts in parking areas or construction equipment at
the time of construction or excavation work otherwise permitted by this title.
Insects and rodents. All materials including wastes shall be stored and all grounds
s a e ma�n aine in a manner which will not attract or aid the propagation of insects
or rodents or create a health hazard.
FINDING: Based on the information provided by the applicant, the expanded use of the
property will conform to the above requirements. If for some reason the above
standards were in question, and it was subsequently found that the use was out
of compliance with any of the above standards, the �roperty owner would be
subject to code enforcement, court review, and possible fines until they were
brought back into compliance. .A search of city records does not indicate any
code enforcement issues associated with the existing use.
Landsca in and Screenin — Cha ter 18.745:
ree rees: ec ion . . s a es a all development proJ ects fronting on a
public street shall be required to plant street trees in accordance with Section
18.745.040.0 Section 18.745.040.0 requires that street trees be spaced between 20
and 40 feet apart depending on the size classification of the tree at maturity (small,
medium or large).
The subject site has 395 feet of frontage along SW 98�' Avenue. Therefore, the development
would require the installation of street trees as prescribed in TDC Chapter 18.745. The
applicant has provided a street tree plan and indicated in the n�rrative that eleven (11) new
sfreet trees will be provided at 30-foot intervals along SW 98 Avenue. The applicants'
landscape architect has proposed to plant flowering cherry trees, which are approved street
trees at 30 feet on center. This proposal meets the species and spacing standards as required
within the chapter. This critenon is satisfied.
Land Use Buffering and Screening:
Buffering and Screening is required between different txpes of land uses. It is the intent
of these standards to provide for privacy and protection and reduce or eliminate the
adverse impacts of visual or noise pollution that a development site may impose on
adjacent properties.
The proposed use is in a residential zone and partially abutting residential uses on three
sides, It is also adjacent to a gol� course to the north and east, and to another church directly
south. The facility fronts SW 98 h Avenue. In these locations, buffering is.not required. StafF
has visited the site and the buffer area is very large and .has been previously landscaped.
The applicant is proposing to increase the landscaping within the parki�g areas and along
the southern boundary, as well as, planting street trees along SW 98 Avenue. Staff is
confident that the landscaping and screening that is existing, and that is proposed will satisfy
any need for buffering and screening from this addition. There is no need to require
additional buffering and screening from adjacent uses. This criterion is satisfied.
TIGARD CHURCH OF GOD EXPANSION PAGE 10 OF 21 CUP2003-00005
7l28/2003 PUBLIC HEARING STAFF REPORT TO THE HEARINGS OFFICER
Screening -Special Provisions:
Section 18.745.050.E requires the screening of parking and loading areas. Landscaped
parking areas shall include special design features, wFiich effectively screen the parking
lot areas from view. Planting materials to be installed should achieve a relative balance
between low lying and vertical shrubbery and trees. Trees shall be planted in
landscaped islands in all parking areas, and shall be equally distributed on the basis of
one (1) tree for each seven (7) parking spaces in order to provide a canopy effect. The
minimum dimension on the landscape islands shall be three (3) feet wide and the
landscaping shall be protected from vehicular damage by some form of wheel guard or
curb.
The existing parking area is already comp�iant with the requirements of the TDC, and the
applicant has provided the City with a landscape plan that demonstrates compliance with the
standards within the TDC around the parking area that is to be restriped. This criterion is
satisfied.
Mixed Solid Waste and Rec clables Stora e — Cha ter 18.755:
ap er . requires a new cons ruc ion incorpora es functional and adequate
space for on-site storage and efficient collection of mixed solid waste and source
separated Recyclables prior to pick-up and removal by haulers.
The applicant must choose one (1) of the following four (4) methods to demonstrate
compl�ance: Minimum Standard, Waste Assessment, Comprehensive Recyclin� Plan,
or Franchised Hauler Review and Sign-Off. The applicant will have to submit evidence
or a plan, which indicates compliance with this section. Regardless of which method
chosen, the applicant will have to submit a written sign-off from the franchise hauler
regarding the facility location and compatibility.
The applicant has stated that the location of the existin� facility will not change and has
indicated that the service provider is satisfied with continuing regular service at that location.
This standard is satisfied.
Location Standards.
To encourag e its use, the storag e area for source-separated recyclable shall be co-
located wit�i the storage area for residual mixed solid waste; fndoor and outdoor
storage areas shall comply with Uniform Building and Fire Code requirements;
Storage area space requirements can be satisfied with a single location or multiple
locations, and can combine both interior and exterior locations; Exterior storage areas
can be located within interior side yard or rear yard areas. Exterior stora e areas shall
not be located within a required front yard setback or in a yard adjacent�o a public or
private_street; Exterior storaye areas shall be located in central and visible focations
on a site to enhance securify for users• Exterior storage areas can be located in a
parking area, if the proposed use provic�es at least the minimum number of parking
spaces required for the use after deducting the area used for storage. Stora�ge areas
shall be app ropriately screened according to the provisions in 18.755.050 C; design
standards• The storage area shall be accessible for collection vehicles and located so
that the s�orage area will not obstruct pedestrian or vehicle traffic movement on the
site or on pubtic streets adjacent to the site.
The applicant does not intend to change the size or location of the existing facility. The
existing facility is already within the south parking lot. This standard has been met.
Design Standards.
The dimensions of the storage area shall accommodate containers consistent with
current methods of local collection; Storage containers shall meet Uniform Fire Code
standards and be made and covered with waterproof materials or situated in a covered
area; Exterior storage areas shall be enclosed by a sight-obscuring fence wall, or
hedge at least six feet in height. Gate openings which allow access to users and
haufers shall be provided. Gate openings for haulers shall be a minimum of 10 feet
wide and shall be capable of being secured in a closed and open position; Storage
area(s) and containers shall be clearly labeled to indicate the type of materials
accepted.
TIGARD CHURCH OF GOD EXPANSION PAGE 11 OF 21 CUP2003-00005
7/28/2003 PUBLIC HEARING STAFF REPORT TO THE HEARINGS OFFICER
Staff has visited the site and the facility is screened, however, the applicant is proposing to
rebuild the screen with a brick wall of four feet in height. This criterion is not satisfied.
FINDING: The applicant has proposed a four foot high wall to screen the facility; however,
the development code requires a six-foot screen.
CONDITION:Prior to the issuance of building permits, the applicant shall revise the plans to
include provisions for a six-foot wall around the trash enclosure.
Off-Street Parkinq and Loadinq (18.765):
�isabTe�C= c�i e ar ing:
All parking areas shall be rovided with the required number of parking spaces for
disabled persons as speci�ed by the State of Oregon Uniform Building Code and
federal sfandards. Such parking spaces shall be sized, signed and marked as
required by these regulations.
According to the Ore on Uniform Building Code, a parking facility accommodating 101-150
spaces requires five �) ADA accessible spaces. The applicant has indicated that there will
be a total of seven (7) throughout the site. This criterion is satisfied.
Access Drives:
With regard to access to public streets from off-street parking: access drives from the
street to off-street parking or loading areas shall be designed and constructed to
facilitate the flow of traffic and provide maximum safety for pedestrian and vehicular
traffic on the site; the number and size of access drives shall be in accordance with
the requirements of Chapter, 18.705, Access, Egress and Circulation; access drives
shall be clearly and permanently marked and defined through use of rails, fences,
walls or other barriers or markers on frontage not occupied by service drives; access
drives shall have a minimum vision clearance in accordance with Chapter 18.795,
Visual Clearance; access drives shall be improved with an asphalt or concrete
surface; and excluding single-family and duplex residences, except as provided by
Subsection 18.810.030.P, groups of two or more parking spaces shall be served by a
service drive so that no backing movements or other maneuvering within a street or
other public right-of-way will be required.
The applicant is proposin to utilize the two existing accesses. The TDC requires two,
30-foot accesses with twen�y-four feet of pavement. TFiis criterion is satisfied.
Loadinglunloading driveways:
A drivewa� designed for continuous forward flow of passenger vehicles for the
purpose o loading and unloading passengers shall be locateci on the site of any
school or other meeting place which is designed to accommodate more than 25
people at one time.
The applicant did not specifically address this criterion, however, a visit to the site and review
of the site plan indicates that this criterion is easily satisfied by the location of the two (2)
accesses and the main entrance. This criterion is satisfied.
Parking Lot Striping:
Except for single-family and duplex residences, any area intended to be used to meet
the off-street parking requirements as contained in this Chapter.shall have all parking
spaces clearlx marked; and all interior drives and access aisles shall be clearly
marked and signed to show direction of flow and maintain vehicular and pedestrian
safety.
The applicant has indicated that the parkin� lot will be restriped and has indicated striping on
the plans. However, the applicants restriping Plan does not include provisions to mark
access aisles and direction of flow. This critenon has not been met.
FINDING: The applicant does not clearly mark the access aisles and direction of flow as
required.
TIGARD CHURCH OF GOD EXPANSION PAGE 12 OF 21 CUP2003-00005
7/28/2003 PUBLIC HEARING STAFF REPORT TO THE HEARINGS OFFICER
CONDITION:Prior to the issuance of building permits, the applicant shall submit a revised
site plan that shows that all access aisles, parking spaces, and direction of flow
are clearly identified and marked as part of the parking lot striping.
Space and Aisle Dimensions:
Table 18.765.1. outlines the minimum dimensions for angled parking.
The parking areas are pre-existing and staff has reviewed the areas that are to be restriped.
According, to the site plan, the dimensional requirements of the restriped parking areas meet
the minimum dimensional requirements as outlined in Table 18.765.1 for 90 degree parking.
Minimum Bicycle Parking Requirements:
The total number of reyuired bicycle parking spaces for each use is specified in Table
18.765.2 in Section 18.765.070.H.
The TDC requires one (1) parking space for every 20 seats in the main assembly area. The
applicant has indicated that the main sanctuary currently seats 160 patrons. Therefore, the
applicant is required to, provide eight (8) spaces for bicycles. The applicant has indicated that
although there is no existing bike rack on site, they will construct a five stall space at the front of
the sanctuary. This criterion is not satisfied.
FINDING: The applicant has not adequately addressed the minimum bicycle parking
requirements and design standards as required by TDC Sections 18.765.050 and
18.765.070.
CONDITION: Prior to the issuance of building permits, the applicant shall revise the parking
plan to accommodate 8 bicycle-parking spaces. Said spaces must be designed
and constructed to the standards that are identified in TDC Section 18.765.050.
Minimum Off-Street Parking:
Section 18.765.070.H states that the minimum and maximum parking shall be as
required in Table 18.765.2.
As a result of a code amendment by the Tigard City Council in March, 2002, religious
institutions must provide one (1) parking space for every three (3) seats in the main assembly
area. With seating for 160 in the main sanctuary, the church is required to provide a
minimum of 53 off-street parking spaces. The applicant has exceeded the minimum parking
requirements. The church is in parking zone B, therefore, the maximum amount of parking
they. can provide is one (1) space for every 1.3 .seats or in this case 123 spaces. The
applicant is proposing a tota( of 107. This criterion is satisfied.
Off-street loading requirements:
Off-street loading .spaces: Commercial, industrial and institutional buildings or
structures to be built or altered which receive and distribute material or merchandise
by truck shall provide and maintain off-street loading and maneuvering space as
follows:
1. A minimum of one loading space is required for buildings with 10,000 gross
square feet or more•
2. A minimum of two �oading spaces for buildings with 40,000 gross square feet or
more.
Off-street loading dimensions:
1. Each loading berth shall be approved by the City Engineer as to design and
location;
2. Each loading space shall have sufficient area for turning and maneuvering of
vehicles on the site. At a minimum, the maneuvering length shall not be less than
twice the overall length of the longest vehicle using the facility site;
3. Entrances and exits for the loading areas shall be provided at locations approved
by the City Engineer in accordance with Chapter 18.710;
TIGARD CHURCH OF GOD EXPANSION PAGE 13 OF 21 CUP2003-00005
7/28/2003 PUBLIC HEARING STAFF REPORT TO THE HEARINGS OFFICER
4. Screening for off-street loading facilities is required and shall be the same as
screening for parking lots in accordance with Chapter 18.745.
Because of the size of the overall building, the church would be required to provide one (1)
off-street loading space to meet the standard. The applicant contends that the church does not
receive or distri6ute merchandise. Unfortunately the development code does not differentiate
when the overall gross building size is 10,000 square feet or more. This criterion is not
satisfied.
FINDING: The applicant has not addressed the need for off-street loading facilities as
required by TDC Section 18.765.080.
CONDITION: Prior to site work, the applicant shall revise the parking plan to include one (1)
off-street loading space: Said space shall be desi ned and constructed to meet
the dimensional criteria in TDC Section 18.765.080�B).
Tree Removal — Cha ter 18.790
ec ion . requires at a tree Plan for the planting, removal and protection of
trees prepared by a certified arborist be provided for a conditional use application.
The tree plan sf�all include identification of all existing trees, Identification of a
program to save existing trees or mitigate tree removal over 12 inches in caliper,
identification of which trees are proposed to be removed, and a protection program
defining standards and methods that will be used by the applicant to protect trees
during and after construction.
The plan shows 25 trees on site over twelve inches in diameter. Of those trees, the applicant
is certain that two (2), possibly three (3) will need to be removed to accommodate
construction. In the worse case scenario, the applicant is still maintaining 88% of those trees
on site that are over 12 inches in diameter. Therefore, no mitigation is necessary. The
applicant has provided a tree protection plan from Terrill Collier, certified arborist. To ensure
that the tree protection measures are in place, and the tree preservation plan is
implemented, the followmg conditions shall apply.
FINDING: The applicant has proposed to retain 88% percent of trees over twelve inches
on site and is not sub1 ect to any required tree mitigation in accordance with
TDC Section 18.790.030. In order to insure the viability of the existing trees
and those trees within the area of work, the following conditions shall apply
CONDITIONS:
. The applicant shall comply with the protection measures prescribed by
the consulting arborist.
. The applicant shall provide the city arborist with a construction sequence
including installation and removal of tree protection devices, clearing,
grading, and paving.
. The applicant shall notify the city arborist when tree protection measures
are in place so that he may verifjr that the measures will function properly
prior to construction.
Visual Clearance Areas — Cha ter 18.795:
ec ion . . . s a es a e provisions of this chapter shall apply to all
development including the construction of new structures, the remodeling of existing
structures and to a c-hange of use which increases the on-site parking or loading
requirements or which changes the aceess requirements.
Section 18.795.030.B. states that a clear vision area shall contain no vehicle, hedge,
planting, fence, wall structure or temporary or permanent obstruction (except for an
occasional utility pole or tree), exceeding three feet in height, measured from the top
of the curb, or wF�ere no curb exists, from the street center line grade, except that
trees exceeding this height may be located in this area, provided all branches below
eight feet are removed.
TIGARD CHURCH OF GOD EXPANSION PAGE 14 OF 21 CUP2003-00005
7/28/2003 PUBLIC HEARING STAFF REPORT TO THE HEARINGS OFFICER
There are no proposed structures inside of the vision clearance area and the applicant has
stated in the narrat�ve, that all landscaping within the vision clearance area will be maintained
as required by the Tigard Development Code. On-going maintenance of the vision clearance
triangle is required and any violation of this triangle, will be addressed through the City of
Tigard Code Enforcement process. This standard is satisfied.
C. ADDITIONAL SITE DEVELOPMENT REVIEW APPROVAL CRITERIA
Section 18.360.090(A)(2) through 18.360.090(A)(15) provides additional Site DeveloQment
Review approval standards not necessarily covered by the provisions of the previously
listed section�. These additional standards are addressed �mmediately below with the
following exceptions:
The proposal contains no elements related to the provisions of the following and are, therefore,
found to be inapplicable as approval standards:
18.360.090.3 (Exterior Elevations);); 18.360.090.5 (Privacy and Noise: Multi-family or Group
Living Uses); 18.360.090.6 (Private Outdoor Areas: Multi-family Use); 18.360.096.7 (Shared
Outdoor Recreation Areas: Multi-family Use); 18.360.090.8 (100-year floodplain) and
18.360.090.9 (Demarcation of Spaces).
The following sections were discussed previously in this decision and, therefore, will not be
addressed in this section:
18.360.090.13 Parking); 18.360.090.12 (Landscaping); 18.360.090.13 (Drainage); and
18.360.090.14 �Provision for the Disabled); 18.36a 030.15 (Provisions of the underlying zone).
Com liance with all of the a licable re uirements of this title includin Cha ter 18.810
ree an i i y an ar s:
As discussed in this report, all applicable sections have been addressed and where the
proposal is deficient, staff has recommended conditions to ensure compliance.
Relationship to the Natural and Physical Environment:
Buildings shall be: located to preserve existing treess topography and natural
drainage where possible based upon existing site conditions; located in areas not
subject to ground slumping or sliding; located to provide adequate distance between
adjoining buildings for adequate light, air circulation, and fire-fighting; and oriented
with consideration for sun and wind. Trees shall be preserved to the extent possible.
Replacement of trees is subject to the requirements of Chapter 18.790, Tree Removal.
The applicant has proposed to retain 88% of the trees on site that are over 12 inches in
diameter. There are no extraordinary physical or natural restraints that would dictate the
placement of the expansion. No buildings or structures are proposed that will hinder air
circulation, or prevent fire-fighting apparatus from performing their jobs. The proposed
structures do not exceed the allowed height. This criter'ion has been met.
Buffering, screening, and compatibility between adjoining uses:
Bufferin� shall be provided between different types of fand uses and decreased noise
levels, air pollution, visual barrier, on site screening of service areas, storage areas,
parking lots, and mechanical devices on roof tops shall be considered in determining
the intensity of the buffer or screen.
Buffering and screenin� has been addressed elsewhere in this report, and has been
conditioned such that it will meet this criterion.
Crime Prevention and Safety:
. Windows shall be located so that areas vulnerable to crime can be surveyed by
the occupants;
. Interior laundry and service areas shall be located in a way that they can be
observed by others;
TIGARD CHURCH OF GOO EXPANSION PAGE 15 OF 21 CUP2003-00005
7/28l2003 PUBLIC HEARING STAFF REPORT TO THE HEARINGS OFFICER
. Mail boxes shall be located in lighted areas having vehicular or pedestrian
traffic;
. The exterior lighting levels shall be selected and the angles shall be oriented
towards areas vulnerable to crime; and
. Light fixtures shall be provided in areas having heavy pedestrian or vehicular
traffic and in potentially dangerous areas such as parking lots, stairs, ramps
and abrupt grade changes. Fixtures shall be �laced at a height so that light
patterns overlap at a height of seven feet, which is sufficient to illuminate a
person.
The City of Ti�ard Police Department has reviewed this project and has not indicated concern
or objection with the proposal. The crime prevention standards have been satisfied.
Public Transit:
Provisions within the plan shall be included for providing for transit if the development
proposal is adjacent to existing or proposed transit route; the requirements for transit
facilities shall be based on: the location of other transit facilities in the area; and the
size and type of the proposal. The following facilities may be required after City and
Tri-Met review: bus stop shelters; turnouts for buses; and connecting paths to the
shelters.
There are no transit services adjacent to this site. The nearest stops to this site are located
at SW Hall Blvd. This criterion is satisfied.
D. STREET AND UTILITY IMPROVEMENTS STANDARDS - CHAPTER 18.810
Chapter 18.810 provides construction standards for the implementation of public and
private facilities and utilities such as streets, sewers, and drainage. The applicable
standards are addressed below:
Streets:
Improvements:
Section 18.810.030.A.1 states that streets within a development and streets adjacent
shall be improved in accordance with the TDC standards.
Section 18.810.030.A.2 states that any new street or additional street width planned as
TDC��on of an existing street shall be dedicated and improved in accordance with the
Minimum Rights-of-Way and Street Widths: Section 18.810.030(E requires an arterial
street to have a 60 to74 to 122-foot right-of-way width and 12-foo travel lanes. Other
improvements required may include on-street parking, sidewalks and bikeways,
underground utilities, street lighting, storm drainage, and street trees.
This site lies adjacent to SW 98'h Avenue, which is classified as a Neighborhood Route on
the City of Tigard Transportation Plan Map. At present, there is approximately 55 feet of
right-of-way (ROW), according to the most recent tax assessor's map. The applicant has
submitted a copy of a Street Dedication document from 1978 that shows an additional 5 feet
of ROW dedicated to the public. This brings the total ROW along the frontage to 60 feet.
This exceeds the minimum ROW required for a Neighborhood Route.
SW 98th is fully improved except for street trees. The applicant's plan indicates they will
plant street trees according to the required spacing. The applicant has requested that they
be allowed to plant the street trees east of the sidewalk because the existing planter strip is
only 4' wide. The street trees may be planted east of the sidewalk as long as they are at
least 2' away.
TIGARD CHURCH OF GOD EXPANSION PAGE 16 OF 21 CUP2003-00005
7/28/2003 PUBLIC HEARING STAFF REPORT TO THE HEARINGS OFFICER
Sidewalks: Section 18.810.070.A requires that sidewalks be constructed to meet City
design standards and be located on both sides of arterial, coilector and local
residential streets.
There is an existing sidewalk along 98th Avenue. No sidewalk improvements are�required.
Sanitary Sewers:
Sewers Required: Section 18.810.090.A requires that sanitary sewer be installed to
serve each new development and to connect developments to existing mains in
accordance with the provisions set forth in Design and Construction Standards for
Sanitary and Surface Water Management (as adopted by Clean Water Services in 1996
and including any future revisions or amendments) and the adopted policies of the
comprehensive plan.
Over-sizin�: Section 18.810.090.0 states that proposed sewer systems shall include
consideration of additional development with�n the area as projected by the
Comprehensive Plan.
The closest sewer line is an 8-inch line in Brentwood Place to the east. The applicanYs plan
shows a sewer lateral from the proposed addition connecting to the sewer located in
Brentwood Place. This standard is satisfied.
Storm Drainage:
General Provisions: Section 18.810.100.A states requ� ires developers to make
adequate provisions for storm water and flood water runoff.
Accommodation of Upstream Drainage: Section 18.810.100.0 states that a culvert or
other drainage facility shall be large enough to accommodate potential runoff from its
entire upstream drainage area, wFiether inside or outside the development. The City
Engineer shall approve the necessary size of the facility, based on the provisions of
Design and Construction Standards for Sanitary and Surface Water Management (as
adopted by Clean Water Services in 2000 and including any future revisions or
amendments}.
There are no existing upstream drainage areas that affect this site.
Effect on Downstream Drainage: Section 18.810.100.D states that where it is
anticipated by the City Engineer that the additional runoff resulting ,from the
development will overload an existing drainage facility, the Director and Engineer shall
withhold approval of the development until provisions have been made for
improvement of the potential condition or until provisions have been made for storage
of additional runoff caused by the development in accordance with the Design and
Construction Standards for Sanitary and SurFace Water Management (as adopted by
_ Clean Water Services in 2000 and including any future revisions or amendments).
In 1997, Clean Water Services (CWS) completed a basin study of Fanno Creek and adopted
the Fanno Creek Watershed Management Plan. Section V of that plan includes a
recommendation that local governments institute a stormwater detention/effective impervious
area reduction program resulting in no net increase in storm peak flows up to the 25-year
event. The City will require that all new developments resulting in an increase of impervious
surfaces provide onsite detention facilities, unless the development is located adjacent to
Fanno Creek. For those developments adjacent to Fanno Creek, the storm water runoff will
be permitted to discharge without detention.
The net new impervious surface area is only 3233 sf. Therefore, detention is not required.
The stormwater runoff from the new impervious surface will be collected in a 4-inch rain drain
that will connect to a 6-inch storm line. The 6-inch line will transmit the flow to a water quality
swale on the south side of the parking lot. The outflow from the swale will connect to the
existing catch basin at the south west corner of the parking lot.
TIGARD CHURCH OF GOD EXPANSION PAGE 1T OF 21 CUP2003-00005
7/28/2003 PUBLIC HEARING STAFF REPORT TO THE HEARINGS OFFICER
Bikeways and Pedestrian Pathways:
Bikeway Extension: Section 18.810.110.A states that developrr�ents adjoining
Proposed bikeways identified on the City's adopted pedestrian/bikeway plan shafl
include provisions for the future extension of such bikeways through the dedication of
easements or right-of-way.
SW 98�h Aven�e is designated as a bicycle facility. There is an existing bikeway along the
east side of 98 Avenue. No additional improvements are warranted.
Utilities:
Section 18.810.120 states that all utility lines, but not limited to those required for
electric, communication, lighting and cable television services and related facilities
shall be placed underground, except for surface mounted transformers, surface
mounted connection boxes and meter cabinets which max be placed above �round,
temporary utility service facilities during construction, high capacity electric lines
operating at 50,000 volts or above, and:
. The developer shall make all necessary arrangements with the serving utility to
provide the underg round services;
. The City reserves the right to approve location of all surface mounted facilities;
. All underground utilities, including sanitary sewers and storm drains installed in
streets by the developer, shall be consfructed prior to the surFacing of the
streets; and
. Stubs for service connections shall be long enough to avoid disturbing the
street improvements when service connections are made.
Exception to Under-Grounding Requirement: Section 18.810.120.0 states that a
devetoper shall pay a fee in-lieu of under-grounding costs when the development is
proposed to take place on a street where ex�sting ufilities which are not underground
will serve the development and the approval authority determines that the cost and
technical difficulty of,under-grounding the utilities outwei�hs the benefit of under-
grounding in con1 unction with the development. The determination shall be on a case-
by-case basis. The most common, but not the only, such situation is a short frontage
development for which under-grounding would result in the placement of additional
poles, rather than the removal of above-ground utilities facilities. An applicant for a
development which is served by utilities which are not underground and which are
located across a public right-of-way from the applicant's property shall pay a fee in-
lieu of under-grounding.
There are existing overhead utility lines along the frontage of SW 98�' Avenue. If the fee
in-lieu is proposed, it is equal to $27.50 per lineal foot of street frontage that contains the
overhead lines. The frontage along this site is 395 lineal feet; therefore the fee would be
$10,862.00.
ADDITIONAL CITY ANDIOR AGENCY CONCERNS WITH STREET AND UTILITY
Public Water S stem: �
is si e is serve y ity of Tigard Water. The applicant indicates the existing water service
is adequate to serve the addition.
Storm Water Qualit :
e iy as agreed to enforce Surface Water Management (SWM) regulations
established by Clean Water Services (CWS) Design and Construction Standards
(adopted by Resolution and Order No. 00-7) which require the construction of on-site
water quality facilities. The facilities shall be designed to remove 65 percent of the
phosphorus contained in 100 percent of the storm water runoff generated from newly
created im pervious surFaces. In addition, a maintenance plan shall be submitted
indicating the frequency and method to be used in keeping the facility maintained
through the year.
TIGARD CHURCH OF GOD EXPANSION PAGE 18 OF 21 CUP2003-00005
7/28/2003 PUBLIC HEARING STAFF REPORT TO THE HEARINGS OFFICER
Prior to construction, the applicant shalf submit plans and calculations for a water quality
facility that will meet the intent of the CWS Design Standards. In addition, the applicant shall
submit a maintenance plan for the facility that must be reviewed and approved by the City
prior to construction.
To ensure compliance with Clean Water Senrices desig n and construction standards, the
applicant shall employ the design engineer responsible for the design and specifications of
the private water quality facility, to perform construction and visual observation of the water
quality facility for compliance with the design and specifications. These inspections shall be
made at significant stages throughout the project and at completion of the construction. Prior
to final building inspection, the design engineer shall provide the City of Tigard (Inspection
Supervisor) with wntten confirmation that the water quality facility is in compliance with the
design and specifications.
Gradin and Erosion Control:
esig n an ons ruc ion Standards also regulate erosion control to reduce the
amount of-sediment and other pollutants reaching the public storm and surface water
system resultiny from development, construction, grading, excavating, clearing, and
any other activi�y which accelerates erosion. Per CWS regulations, fhe app licant is
required to submit an erosion control plan for City review and approvaf prior to
issuance of City permits.
The Federal Clean Water Act requires that a National Pollutant Discharge Elimination
System (NPDES) erosion control permit be issued for any development that will
disturb five or more acres of land. Since this site is over five acres, the developer will
be required to obtain an NPDES permit from the City prior to construction. This permit
will be issued along with the site and/or building permit.
The Buildin Division will review the grading and erosion control plans for this development
as a part of�he site permit review.
E. IMPACT STUDY:
ec ion . . . .e states that the applicant shall provide an impact study to
quantify the effect of development on pub�ic facilities and services. For each public
facility system and type of impact, the stud� shall propose improvements necessary to
meet City standards, and to minimize the impact of the development on the public at
large, public facilities systems, and affected private property users.
In situations where the Community Development Code requires the dedication of real
propert�r interests, the applicant shall either specifically concur with a requirement for
public right-of-way dedication, or provide evidence that supports that the real property
dedication is not roughly proportional to the projected impacts of the development.
The applicant has submitted an impact study addressing the required elements above.
ROUGH PROPORTIONALITY ANALYSIS
Based on a transportation impact study prepared by Mr. David Larson for the A-Boy
Expansion/Dolan/Resolution 95-61, TIF's are expected to recapture 32 percent of the traffic
impact of new development. Presently, the TIF for this project is estimated at $5,607.
According to the Washington County TIF ordinance, 32 percent of a projects impacts are met
by its TIF assessment in Tigard. This leaves 68% unmitigated. The actual cost of system
improvements er trip generated by new development on the Tigard street system can be
determined by �he foflowing equation (Larson, Mackenzie Engineering, Dolan Findings, June
1995): $1,053 divided by .32 equals $3,303.12.
($1,053 is theTlF assessment according to the Washington County TIF ordinance effective
July 1, 2003).
Less miti ated costs
e app icant is not required to make any dedications or improvements outside of what was
proposed.
TIGARD CHURCH OF GOD EXPANSION PAGE 19 OF 21 CUP2003-00005
7/28/2003 PUBLIC HEARING STAFF REPORT TO THE HEARINGS OFFICER
Estimate of Unmiti ated Im acts
umpac ........ ............................................................................ 3,303.12
Less T1F Assessment ...................................................................... 1 053
s ima e o nmi iga e mpac s , . 2
FINDING: Usin the above cost factors, it can be determined that there are no
unm�igated impacts and, therefore, the proposed improvements and imposed
conditions are roughly proportional and justified.
SECTION VIII. OTHER STAFF COMMENTS
The City of Tigard Building Division has reviewed the proposal and stated that the
proximity of the new admin. building to the existing church will require modifications to the
existing church. The modification will entail 1 hr. walls with parapets and possibiy no
openings (doors). The new admin. building will be required to meet all applicable building
codes.
The City of Tigard Engineering Department was sent this proposal for review and the
comments have been incorporated into this report.
The City of Tigard Operations Utility Manager has reviewed this application and has
indicated that all utility work should be coordinated with the City. Sanitary and Storm are
private. He also indicated that the applicant needs to supplement the existing water meter
with a backflow device. Contact Rich Sattler at the Tigard Water District.
The City of Ti�ard Arborist has reviewed this application and has indicated that the tree
protection fencing was not shown on the plan as indicated in the arborist report. He also
indicated that the tree inventory and health report were not included in the report. Staff has
recommended that the applicant notify the city's arborist�prior to site work so that he can
ensure Protection measures are in place and functioning. The trees that would potentially be
affected were shown on the tree planting plan. The city arborist can be reached at (503)
639-4171, ext. 2589
City of Tigard Police Department has reviewed this application and offered no comments
or ob�ections.
SECTION IX. AGENCY COMMENTS
Clean Water Services has reviewed the proposal and indicated that the applicant needs to
adjust the water quality swale as needed to provide required treatment.
Tualatin Valley Fire and Rescue has reviewed this application and has provided the
following comments:
�� FIRE APPARATUS ACCESS ROAD DISTANCE FROM BUILDING AND TURNAROUNDS:
ccess roa s s a e wit in eet o a portions o t e extenor wa o t e irst story o
the building as measured by an approved route around the exterior of the building. An
approved furnaround is required if the remaining distance to an approved intersecting
roadway, as measured along the fire apparatus access road, is greater than 150 feet. (UFC
Sec. 902.2.1)
z� DEAD END ROADS: Dead end fire apparatus access roads in excess of 150 feet in length
s a e provi e with an approved turnaround. Diagrams of approved turnarounds are
available from the fire district. (UFC Sec. 902.2.2.4)
s> PAINTED CURBS: Where required, fire apparatus access roadway curbs shall be painted
ye ow an mar ed "NO PARKING FIRE LANE" at each 25 feet. Lettenng shall have a
stroke of not less than one inch wide by six inches high. Lettering shall be white on red or
black on yellow background. (UFC Sec. 901.4.5.2)
TIGARD CHURCH OF GOD EXPANSION PAGE 20 OF 21 CUP2003-00005
7l28/2003 PUBLIC HEARING STAFF REPORT TO THE HEARINGS OFFICER
a� COMMERCIAL BUILDINGS - REQUIRED FIRE FLOW: The required fire flow for the
ui ing s a not excee , ga ons per minute or the available GPM in the water
delivery system at 20 psi, whichever is less. A worksheet for calculating the required fire
flow is available from the Fire Marshal's Office. (UFC Sec. 903.3)
s� COMMERCIAL BUILDINGS - FIRE HYDRANTS: No portion of the exterior of a commercial
ui ing s a e ocate more t an eet rom a fire hydrant when measured in an
approved manner around the outside of the building and along an approved fire apparatus
access roadway. Any h ydrants that are left over from the minimum number of hydrant
calculations may be full filled by hydrants that are up to 500 feet from any point of the
building. The fire Prevention Ordinance has further requirements that need fo be used for
acceptance and placement of fire hydrants. (UFC Sec. 903.4.2.1)
s� COMMERCIAL BUILDINGS - MINIMUM NUMBER OF FIRE HYDRANTS: The minimum
num er o ire y rants or a ui ing s a e ase on t e require ire ow prior to giving
credit for fire protection systems divided by 1500. If the answer is equal to or greater than
x.5 the next whole number of hydrants shall be used. There shall not be less than 2
hydrants per building. (UFC Sec. 903.4.2.1)
�� Considerations for lacin fire h drants shall be as follows:
. xisting y rants in t e area may e use to meet the required number of hydrants;
however, hydrants that are over 500 feet away from the nearest point of the subject
building shall not contribute to the required number of hydrants.
• Hydrants that are separated from the subject building by railroad tracks shall not
contribute to the required number of hydrants.
. Hydrants that are separated from the subject building by divided highway, freeway, or
heavily traveled collector streets shall not contribute to the required number of
hydrants.
• Hydrants that are accessible only by a bridge shall be acceptable to contribute to the
required number of hydrants only if approved by the Chief.
• Private hydrants or public hydrants that are on adjacent private property shall not
contribute to the required number of hydrants for the subject building. �Exce�tion: The
use of hydrants located on other private property may be considered i t ef h ir locations
and access are encumbered in a legal document (such as deed restriction) by the
owners of the involved parcels of property. The encumbrance may be lifted only after
approvals by the Chief on behalf of the fiire department and any other governmental
agencies that may require approval.
. When evaluating the placement of hydrants at apartment or industrial complexes the
first hydrant(s) to be placed shall be at the primary access and any secondary access
to the site. �4fter these hydrants have been placed other hydrants shall be sited to
meet the above requirements for spacing and minimum number of hydrants. (UFC
Sec. 903.4.2.1.1)
s. ACCESS AND FIRE FIGHTING WATER SUPPLY DURING CONSTRUCTION: Approved
ire apparatus access roa ways an ire ig ting water supp ies s a e installed and
operational prior to any other construction on fhe site or subdivision. (UFC Sec. 8704)
Portland General Electric, Ti�ard/Tualatin School District, NW Natural Gas, and
Verizon were give e opportunity to review this proposal and submitted no comments or
objections.
��� � July 21, 2003
PREPARED BY: Brad Kilbjr DATE
��--�
Associate Planner
;=
f�
�� -- ��� Jul 21 2003
APPRO ED BY: Richa ewersdorff DATE
Plan�� g Manager
TIGARD CHURCH OF GOD EXPANSION PAGE 21 OF 21 CUP2003-00005
7/28/2003 PUBLIC HEARING STAFF REPORT TO THE HEARINGS OFFICER
Q �
ST LER .
H �EO�A.o, � ��.o,�.,�o� ,...�M
�y YICINITY MAP
� = j m Y
F- Q [r o° _ _ — _ _ _ — =
R � ° a CUP2003-00005
KABL ST \ � Q —
s = = = = = = = —
TIGARD CHURCH OF
GOD EXPANSION
�
���\��,o
��
��
�
�
DR
� �
�qn�cFp
�o = D �- -��
F- o . _ a°= - ='_
� m cc r�_ .....�y�,
� � y r�<
� � g�r ._. ..f;� � ,,: h
� Q \� �f� � ,�F a • �:
Q \au`�S.rr,r�9;:
� r--r• -1 � �P � N:JNI'fA D
� � , .
Gt...._..., .'.'?;�.
� pE�F6FN0A� W �R
,�.-....�...- ..���
O � �, •..:
D Rl >- I nyxd a..M.a .. jl
�
� 2 � �
♦
� N
a
G e 0 100 200 900 t00 Feet
����j_� � 7"•J20 leet
'v O�
m Ciry of Tigard
RD DUF
Information on Ihi�m�p is lar pener�l lot�tiOn only�n0
�hoWC ba wnBed with lh�Devslopment Ssrvicse Division.
�l,J 13125 SW Hall Blvd
� Tlpord,OR 97223
, U (503)839-4171
htlp:/Mww.ci.liparC.or.us
Community Development Plot date:Jun 10,2003;C:lmagiclMAGIC03.APR
H
� � � �
�° � 3
� �
{/1� � t W �' +
rt3 � — SW 98T" AVENUE 7° � � ' T
S ' ` r �s k
,,,� .( o �vi+.:io.uro�a
O D " � �� �'` E p = "' e c� `�
N N _—, � � 4`�
� � O � ... n . ,.. . "" �
� � :v. �,. ..�. :,,�.,.:.1 � �ry .'. . .... . � K .
c ,.
.. . .. . .. ... ...._.. .:.. .�:.: �. .
y �� i p: :�'X� Fn k4�5 }i,-.r., s..�. 4Ry. J L� � k, ��'.�
v � � — — '�- - —�r— �__ _ __ _ 4� _ � � �; , .�;. �
' I ' � � — — 'Y-- — — -a��_�_
� Nr�d J//JSO'�
� +4 ` l'� -SJIU 1 J,v rW a[s (.IYI � ' .
� � �.ou__�� � ———�— �y �yr e _— '—'°°——+_—— �
� �f ^f ———-- \ i
_ # A C \ 1:f' �}
Z � _ « �y `� ' ,S �n� , � Y;� fil710��i In
r � r ,y5� ��� f .��ens l�� r�b
�" � + t �� Z � l(Y.NOh1 ONI
p �T h M nJS/7 JOini.f
� " n7r—�. � �
�4 a �: �' � �� @, �� ;5
` y�,. : R
� ~ oo� , o���:Miw ,.NM,m� . • 9 . �
, � R . .„.s. �...� e t ' `�,
'p4t d iia..i ew ♦ q�' � 2 \ i �
v *� � L.W.Nei� OM�Iq ______ �t — � o r�
.�'v. Mw.i/rw� ,�
� �t�+�.. r P
...� r;, �: , �s
p �:.''ui. .�` �4
� � ��' ' �` � �
o ,. , z
I-I k .
�� �.. � � ,+L �< ° • ; i� E
--.. j` '` "� � �",.,;,,�.�`.3 � I �
e ofi '� �' � t
�� ' '� . �I '*�
�n„ � ��I "'� I a ,
�i
i�» i� a.;v I ' �
� �� � s,,,,,i �d � �nF � .
xcr nSO.vn oNr uu�w �
� L�rv�r r✓nxr�v o,vr � i .ar vu � � r �
v
�$ fl 1�' / JsIJ56VN YR1 �71GM I �'L I Z M
4.` 1N.4.M � ; n
� .� My' �tS ` = MILII � �� I r � „��
A JVYXp/�)YI 11 \ �� I � ���'
YJ ttw.w �, i :� �
� t ;I
..�A n ,.uar.� t xw r � I •.H Nw�v.w+.w.w :.`vn°w`.� i � .
v `,, � � ��; I �.xr y .
H �
°1O� Jp1"`" ` � �.� .. I H.�11/)H,� 9N/15/X3 ��M
r.,0 ...i a.n..v�. . .a o
A �� iiurv . ; Si".�k"�.'�.,d. � r°` �
...
C A i��w h 0� � nwwsP+r �. /� � i e�v�aw.a+ 4�51��:' .w.s n.aw..� ��
MKf MvL'
� C ia'�" ;,;:�iui'�� 'JN/O)//7¢i ', . n..u.�w � ..��,..rr.�.
� O/1dX1S/N/d�Qb'M3N ',I "
n . _; . , ,<< ,(
= N � � — " �..,j.,; ;, ,w,,,,...� —�`�.�G,�s'� �; . �——— ��`
O � � "'" . � ^n ` (� � $
� � � ~�i w:ia `' .,.�..,. . � �w..r. kn I` I � .
� W Y � a`, M� � � t�� `�• N
K L=----'J +
� � f �r r,� ,. ._, � � ,,` t ,», .�.. 3 ,�
O �� �� i�t 4M� ^� � 'w
O � riw+t i�W/wv iLlf• `r 111Y� ^ � � LX
vO 114y wRIX �� ff °LM w �\ � �'� .• 'i.Ms �\
� �" l e Lii/ AM� � � x .O18P�r ��
T %Gr t�'�Y �
x • ;•. / O �� � 3��
� � .�-x�. . �E _ ,.. , •1'J
Z � `� � ;o' .,. ,.,.rc,..b.� � � ..... � �� �� <a.. _('�'��
..� '
N
�
Z
CITY OF TIGARD PLANNING DIVISION �� -
` y REQUEST FOR COMMEHTS CITYOiT10ARD
Community�Development
ShapingA�BetterCommunity
DATE: lune 11,2003
T0: lohn Roy,Propert�Mana9er/Public Works Annex
FROM: Ciiy of Tigard Planning Diuision
STAFF CONTACT: Brad IGiby,Associate Planner[x24341
Phone: [5031639-41�1/Fax: [503]6847291
CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT[CUP)2003-00005
➢ TIGARD CHURCN OF GOD EI(PANSION Q
REQUEST: The applicant is seeking Conditional Use approval to expand the existing facility by 2,875
square feet for administrative offices and classrooms, and make site modifications to the parking and
landscaped areas. LOCATION: 15670 SW 98�' Avenue; WCTM 2S111 CD, Tax Lot 300. ZONE: R-7:
Medium-Density Residential District. The R-7 zoning district is designed to accommodate attached single-
family homes, detached single-family homes with or without accessory residential units, at a minimum lot
size of 5,000 square feet, and duplexes, at a minimum lot size of 10,000 square feet. Mobile home parks �
and subdivisions are also permitted outright. Religious Institutions, some civic, and institutional uses are
also permitted conditionally. APPLICABLE REVIEW CRITERIA: Community Development Code
Chapters: 18.330, 18.360, 18.390, 18.510, 18.705, 18.725, 18.745, 18.755, �8.765, 18.780, 18.790,
18.795 and 18.810.
Attached are the Site Plan, Vicinity Map and Applicant's Statement/Plans for your review. From
information supplied by various,departments and agencies and from other information available to our staff, a
report and recommendation will be prepared and a decision will be rendered on the proposal in the near �
future. If you wish to comment on this application, WE NEED YOUR COMMENTS BACK BY:
JUNE 25 2003. You may use the space provided below or attach a separate letter to return your comments.
ou are una le to res ond b the above date, please phone the staff contact noted above with your
comments and con irm your comments in writing as soon as possible. If you have any questions, contact the
Tigard Planning Division, 13125 SW Hall Boulevard, Tigard, OR 97223.
PLEASE CHECK THE FOLLOWING ITEMS THAT APPLY:
_ We have reviewed the proposal and have no objections to it.
Please contact of our office.
Please refer to the enclosed letter.
_ Written comments provided below:
,�I a,•, --� � _ .. � � /" ��I��ST/!'f /� �
--' � -- G�D� �c� h'v�T G
Name & Number of Person(s) Commenting:
REQUEST FOR COMMEHTS CITYOFTIOARD
Community�DeveCvpment
ShapingA�Better Community
DATE: lune 11,2003
T0: Matt Stine,Urban Forester/Public Works Annex
FROM: City of Tigard Planning Division
STAFF CONTACT: Brad IGIb]I,Associate Planner[x24341
Phone: [5031639-4111/Fax: [50316841291
CON�ITIONAL USE PERMIT[CUPI 2003-00005
➢ TIGARD CNURCN OF GOD EKPANSION Q
REQUEST: The applicant is seeking Conditional Use approval to expand the existing facility by 2,875
square feet for administrative offices and classrooms, and make site modifications to the parking and
landscaped areas. LOCATION: 15670 SW 98"' Avenue; WCTM 2S111CD, Tax Lot 300. ZONE: R-7:
Medium-Density Residential District. The R-7 zoning district is designed to accommodate attached single-
family homes, detached single-family homes with or without accessory residential units, at a minimum lot
size of 5,000 square feet, and duplexes, at a minimum lot size of 10,000 square feet. Mobile home parks
and subdivisions are also permitted outright. Religious Institutions, some civic, and institutional uses are
also permitted conditionally. APPLICABLE REVIEW CRITERIA: Community Development Code
Chapters: 18.330, 18.360, 18.390, 18.510, 18.705, 18.725, 18.745, 18.755, 18.765, 18.780, 18.790,
18.795 and 18.810.
Attached are the Site Plan, Vicinity Map and Applicant's Statement/Plans for your review. From
information supplied by various,departments and agencies and from other information available to our staff, a
report and recommendation will be prepared and a decision will be rendered on the proposal in the near
fufure. If you wish to comment on this application, WE NEED YOUR COMMENTS BACK BY:
' JUNE 25 2003. You may use the space provided below or attach a separate etter to return your comments.
you are una le to respond by the above date, please phone the staff contact noted above with your
comments and confirm your comments in writing as soon as possible. If you have any questions, contact the
Tigard Planning Division, 13125 SW Hall Boulevard, Tigard, OR 97223.
PLEASE CHECK THE FOLLOWING ITEMS THAT APPLY:
_ We have reviewed the proposal and have no objections to it.
Please contact of our office.
Please refer to the enc osed letter.
� Written comments provided below:
(�%R� �RA��rro�J FE�tu u4 �s Nor s ko w�! o N r�E P c�u ,�9�s r�A��r� i�
�'� �IRc3�i��`i R p�o�Lr
�
(o� (!� rNu+�NTaRy � H-�A��-r!t Z EPo Rr ovo i r+Uc.��A EA r�! t� A��so�LisT
�FPo�i,
���
�Name & Number of Person(s) Commenting: I
.
REQUEST FOR COMMENTS CITYOFTIGARD
Community�DeveCopment
ShapingA Better Community
DATE: lune 11,2003
T0: lim Wolf,Tigard Police Department Crime Pre�ention OfficerRECEIVED PLANNII�
FROM: City of Tigard Planning Division JUU L :� 2�03
STAFF CONTACT: Brad IGIb]I,Associate Planner[x24341 CITY OF TIGA�
Phone: [5031639-4111/Fax: [5031684-1297
CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT[CUPI 2003-00005
➢ TIGARD CHURCH OF GOD El(PANSIONQ
REQUEST: The applicant is seeking Conditional Use approval to expand the existing facility by 2,875
square feet for administrative offices and classrooms, and make site modifications to the parking and
landscaped areas. LOCATION: 15670 SW 98�' Avenue; WCTM 2S111 CD, Tax Lot 300. ZONE: R-7:
Medium-Density Residential District. The R-7 zoning district is designed to accommodate attached single-
family homes, detached single-family homes with or without accessory residential units, at a minimum lot
size of 5,000 square feet, and duplexes, at a minimum lot size of 10,000 square feet. Mobile home parks
and subdivisions are also permitted outright. Religious Institutions, some civic, and institutional uses are
also permitted conditionally. APPLICABLE REVIEW CRITERIA: Community Development Code
Chapters: 18.330, 18.360, 18.390, 18.510, 18.705, 18.725, 18.745, 18.755, 18.765, 18.780, 18.790,
18.795 and 18.810.
Attached are the Site Plan, Vicinity Map and Applicant's Statement/Plans for your review. From
information supplied by various,departments and agencies and from other information available to our staff, a
report and recommendation will be prepared and a decision will be rendered on the proposal in the near
future. If you wish to comment on this application, WE NEED YOUR COMMENTS BACK BY:
JUNE 25 2003. You may use the space provided below or attach a separate letter to return your comments.
ou are una le to res ond b the above date, please phone the staff contact noted above with your
comments and con irm your comments in writing as soon as possible. If you have any questions, contact the
Tigard Planning Division, 13125 SW Hall Boulevard, Tigard, OR 97223.
PLEASE CHECK THE FOLLOWING ITEMS THAT APPLY:
_ We have reviewed the proposal and have no objections to it.
Please contact of our office.
Please refer to the enclosed letter.
_ Written comments provided below:
Name & Number of Person(s) Commenting: �.�p�F �-�,cy� I
�
REQUEST FOR COMMENTS ����
�a,�,��,����t
S(tapin�A�ettcr Commrcnity
oA�: iune r.zoo�� p C� (� C� � d �
T0: lse Walkcr.C1eanWater Senrices/SWII��ro+�ram �U� g 2 20 03
FROM Clpt of�iuzi'd PlaMnln�Yivi�on
ey
StAH C�ONTACT: Bratl �L�sec�ate Pla�ner[xY4341
Pho�e: [50�I]639-411U F9x: [503)6a47297
^ CONDITIONAL USF PERMR LCUP�2003-00005
ta TI6ARD CNURCH OF GOD FJIPANS�ON Q
RE� l�JEST: The applicant is seeking Conditional Use approval to expand the exisfiing facility by 2,875
squ u'e feet for administrative offices and classrooms, and make site modfications to the parking and
lan� scaped areas. LOCATIa�N: 15670 SW 98�' Avenue; WCTM 2S111CD, Tax Lot 300. ZONE: R-7:
Me� itam-Density Residential ��istrict. The R-7 zoning district is designed to accommodate attached single-
farr I�� homes, detached single-family homes with or without accessory residential units, at a minimum lot
sizE ��f 5,000 square feet, ancl duplexes, at a minimum lot size of 10,000 square feet. Mobile home parks
anc subdivisions are also permitted outright. Religious Institutivns, some civic, and institutional uses are
als� permitted conditivnally. APPLICABLE �EVIEW CRITERIA: Community Development Code
Ch; ��ters: 18.330, 18.360, 18.390, 18.510, 18.705, 18.725, '18.745, 18.755, 18,765, 18.780, 18.790,
18, ''.a5 and 18.810.
Atta :hed are the Site Plan, Vicinity Map and Applicant's StatementlPlans for your review. From
infoi r�ation suPplied by variou� departments and agenc'ies and from other information available to our staff, a
repc �1: and recvmmendation w�ill be prepared and a decision will be rendered on the pro�posal in the near
futu s� _If ou wish to cornment on this application, �N1'd , I� �� '� � Pr�i�'��11711UtB�Y' 'a'il B�. C3KGI�I@BIY9�I
�� � �i]� �� � � �,�� You may use the space provided below or attac a separate er to return you�comments.
u are una le to res nd b the above date, please phone the staff contact noted above with your
coR T�ents and con rm your camments in writing as soon as ossible. If you have any questions, contact the
Tig� r�� Planning Division, 13125 SW Hall Boulevard, Tigard, �R 97223.
,;�;' ��'E�,'��t��,Cl�',T�E;y,�o��'�'(I���� ��i��� TEMi�,,, ,,,,,,, ,� ,. ,�„ ,,. ,�����,�;�q�.�,���,,,,
P,�LE R � ��� „�, ���.,� � ��� ���, �, ',�f.�l :,.,� �����H�,I�,�T�Q►P,�;��(,�;Ji�,I�V��! ,��;i��' ��GI:�j1,
^ , i� � ,,,� „ ,,, ,�, , � ,,, �
We have reviewed the ��roposal and have no objections to it. of our office.
— Please contact
Please refer to the encl��s etter.
— Written comments provided below:
� � i�1.?� �_ 'Ci.�o�3L.�3y t� �.�t.lL�u�u��
� _ � V
! �:►� '
— T CQ
— �
� Jarne & Number of Pers�>n(s} Commentin
T00�j S��IA2I�5 2I�,L�'M HV�'I� 5Z5�9�SCOS YV3 85�TT £0/OZ/90
Jun ZC 03 04: 27p p, l
. . �
ZAIK/MILLER ASSOCIATES
ARCHITECTS AND PI,ANNERS
FAX TRANSMITTAL
DATE: (g �Lp
'ro: lC.K �I�V�Z,S 1»1�F -� P�ann r�
co��: c�D GI Ll.
FAX NUMBER: G107j (� "�'Z c( 7
NUIV�ER OF PAGES INCLUDING COVER PAGE:��
�oM: �ll�l M( L.c��
CONIlVIEN�'S OR SPECIAL INSTRUCTIONS:
2340 NW T�iUR�qN STE 201, POR1'LAND, OR 97210 503/222-9158 F:503/222-1460
�
�
M
Jun 20 03 04: 27p p, z
� �
��f�i��iILLER ASSOCIATES
ARCHITECTS AND PLA1�iNER�
2340 N. W. THURMAN STREET
PORTLAND, OR 97210 TEL: (543)222-9158
FAX:(503)222-l 460
email:zmassoc(�zaikmiiler.com
DATE: June 2�, 2Q03
PKUJECT: Tigard Church �f God
DISTRIBUTI01�1; Dick Bewersdorff
Planning Manager
City of Tigard
�. Enclosed please find a summary of the chronology of t}�e process for application for
CU and also a cc�y of minutes of a meeting May 21 with Brian Blalock and Ga La
I felt it would be helpful for you to know the steps we have one throu h to ry ��la.
process done. g g t�'Y and get ihis
2. I met with the chairm�n and another member of the Building committee from the
Tigard Church of God after we met this morning and toId them you were looking into our
queshons regarding timing and process, and would get t�ack to us.
3• Thanks for y�ur help on this matter.
James Miller, AIA
Zaik/Miller Associates
Jun 20 03 04: 28p p. 3
�At�%MILL�i� AS�O�IATES
ARCNITECT� AND PLAIVNERS
234() N, W, THURMAN STIZEET
PORTLAN D, UR y721 p TEL: (S03)222-9158
FAX:(503)222-l 460
emai I:z mas�ocQz.ai kmii ler,com
DATE: June 20, 20p3
YRUJ EC`T: Tigard C'hurch ot God
DISTRiBUT10N: Building Committee, City of Tigard
1• Recap of Time Line td date on CU applic:ation with City of Ti�ard:
f1. Tues. Aprit $: Pre-App meeting at City,
�• �es. May 13: Neighborhood meeting at Church; this meeting was required
prior to tuFn in �f CU ap�lication to City,
C• Wed- May �4: CU ap.p(icallon turned in to the City Platuiing Dept.
D• Wed May 21: Meeting with Gary Lampella of the Building Dept. to review
Fre-app Building Permit to speed �rocess: decision to add fire s.prinklers to
meet 1 Hour Buildin� rating; discussion about venting ccawl s�ace with
suggestion from Lampe(Ia to vent crawl space. We were toid originaily that
we could submit the Building Permit drawings for review while the CU
process is being finalized, and at the meeting Gary indicated that we should be
able to get a foundation permit while the buiiding permit is �ieing �nalized.
E• Fri. May 30: JM received call from Brad Kilby, Ptanner, informing us that
CU application was "determined to be incomplete"
F• Mon. June 2: received letter from City oudining the factors making ihe
application incomplete:
- Site plan "does not match the Tax assessors map".
- Rec�uired to sh�w parking lot lighting on electrical plan (even though
already shown on Architectural site plan).
- City Engineering needed calcs for water treatment swale shown on
south property side (previously advised these went in with the
application for building permit).
- Required Arborist report for tree protection on large Fir tree ( we were
advised previously at pre-app meeting that a Landscape Architect was
sadsfactory for this information).
- Questioned the selection of Street trees (although we were toid this
could be dccideii at [he hearing,
(Coniinued)
Jun 20 03 04: 28p p_ 4
Tigard Church of God
June 20 Memo
G• Week of June 2 to June 6:
- �►n'aatged to get Arfiorist thru Julia Lundy. She had meeting at site
with Collier Arborists, Report promised this week.
- Received calcs from Dan Symons for water treatment "swaIe"
- Coordinated with Eric Jones of Chase Jones for confirmat�on on the Site
Plan submitted to confirm width of right of way (we showed 30' plus a
5' easement to tlae east side of property line.
Jones dug up legal document signed by City of Tigard in 1978 which
showed our site plan is correct (tax assessors map is apparently wrong)
H. Fri. lune 6:
Delivered all of the above material and met with Brad Kilby Planner
and Brian Rager, Engineer with the City anti his new replacement Kim
CNLN). Received verbal confirmation that CU application was "now
complete",
I• Tues. June l0:
Received letter from City stating application is cornplete anfd hearing
may be scheduled on ]uly 28. Calleci Brad Kilby and urgendy
requested that they try and put us on the I4th of July agenda, Brad
indicated that he would look into that but that they were having trouble
with vacations and a heavy schedule. He was out of town the
remainder of that week.
�• Wed. June l8:
City confrmed that we would be on the 28th hearing sch�dule and not
possible to move up to the 14th.
K. Friday June 20:
Miller went to City to atternpt to make some change in their schedule.
Met with Planning Manager Dicic Bewersdorff when Brad Kilby was
unable to come to the desk. He indicated that he would do some
investigadon on my questions and that someone wonld get back to us.
James Miller, AIA
Zaik/Miller Associates
�
Jun 20 03 04: 28p p, 5
May 22, 2003
Mr. Ed Whitehead
Tigard Church of God
15670 SW 98th Avenue
Tigard, OR 97224
Building Permit— Pre-application meeting:
1. Pre-Application Coriference Meeting, held May 21, 2003
This meeting was attended by:
Gary Lampella, Building Official City of Tigard
Brian Blalock, Senior Plans Examiner, City of Tigard
Ed Whitehead, Building Committee Chairman, Tigard Church of God
Bruce Plunkett, Finance Committee, Tigard Church of God
Jim Omundson, Contractor, Tigard Church of God
Jackie Root, ZaiklMiller Architects
Meeting Notes:
1. The purpose of this meeting was to have the City of Tigard Building
Officials look at the project before we turned it in for permit, with hopes of
expediting the building permit process. Gary Lampella reviewed the
project with us to flag any issues he sees that we would have to change.
The secondary purpose was to discuss the timeline and see how we could
begin construction as soon as possib{e.
2. The first issue we discussed was in regard to the Building Types. The
existing Church is Type 5 (we found out non-rated), fihe new Building is
Type 5. It was determined that we either need to move the Administration
building 8' to the south, which wauld give us a distance of 20' between the
buildings, and make sure the north wall of the new building is 1 hour. This
would include char�ging parapet heights to 30N above the roof line and
adding a '/. hour rated glass to the north side of the new building. This
would be costly and require a large amount of time to make these
changes on the construction documents. The secand option is we could
keep the building where it is and fire sprinkle. Ed, Bruce, and Jim decided
that if would be best in the long run to fire sprinkle primarily because this
same issue of varying building types and distance between the buiidings
will come up again when the Sanctuary is built.
3. The next issue that we discussed is crawi space ventilation. The Building
Department does not recommend blowing air under the crawl space.
Although this is permitted Gary is not in favor of it. Gary and Brian,
suggested adding vents around the foundation at all primary corners to
ensure good cross ventilation. Our building is 2,875 SF, which gives us
Jun 20 03 04: 28p p, g
.
twenty, 9' in diameter vents. However if we have a vapor barrier that
reduces the vents required to 10% of the total, or two, 1' vents.
4. We reviewed the architectural plans. Insulation needs to be brought up to
the roof to "seal" the building envelope. Also, detaii 6/A82 shows Type X
5/8" gyp. board, which wraps the column. This is the oniy piace on the
south side of the building that is not 1 hour rated. Therefore this column
needs to be wrapped with 5/8" gyp. board.
Overall, we felt the meeting was very positive. We expressed that we were
discouraged because we were told we could submit the Conditional Use
and Buiiding Permit applications at the same time, which was later
changed. This makes scheduling volunteers more difficult, we lose good
summer weather, and the cost of materials increases during the fall. Both
Gary and Brian understood this. Gary stated that once we have a tentative
ok from the Planning and Engineering Depa►tment that the project looks
like it will be approved we can submit for Building Permii and Site Review.
Because we have identified the primary issues in this pre-application
meeting, the Building Permit review should be expedited sooner than
normal. Gary stated that we should be able to get a Foundation Permit
almost immediately after submitting for building review, that way we can
start the foundation and site work while the Building Permit is being
finalized. (f we receive the Foundation Permit as stated, we should be able
to proceed with breaking ground on, or around July 1st. We were pleased
with this news. Overali, we felt the meeting with the City was very positive
and productive, and the delay can be overcome.
As a result of this meeting Jim Omundson has sent a set of plans to A-
Professional Fire for a bid and review. f will make all necessary changes
on the architectural plans as discussed, and we will submit for Building
Permit as soon as a tentative ok is received on the Conditional Use
application.
Thank yau.
G �/
J kie Root
Zaik/Miller Archi#ects
�
REQUEST FOR COMMENTS CITYOFTIOARD
Community�Development
Shaping A Better Community
DATE: lune 11,2003
T0: Brian Blalock,Commercial Plans Examiner
FROM: City of Tigard Planning Division
STAFF CONTACT: Brad KilUy,Associate Planner[x24341
Phone: [5031639-4171/Fax: [5031684729]
CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT[CUPI 2003-00005
➢ TIGARD CHURCH OF GOD ERPANSION Q
REQUEST: The applicant is seeking Conditional Use approval to expand the existing facility by 2,875
square feet for administrative offices and classrooms, and make site modifications to the parking and
landscaped areas. LOCATION: 15670 SW 98�' Avenue; WCTM 2S111 CD, Tax Lot 300. ZONE: R-7:
Medium-Density Residential District. The R-1 zoning district is designed to accommodate attached single-
family homes, detached single-family homes with or without accessory residential units, at a minimum lot
size of 5,000 square feet, and duplexes, at a minimum lot size of 10,000 square feet. Mobile home parks
and subdivisions are also permitted outright. Religious Institutions, some civic, and institutional uses are
also permitted conditionally. APPLICABLE REVIEW CRITERIA: Community Development Code
Chapters: 18.330, 18.360, 18.390, 18.510, 18.705, 18.725, 18.745, 18.755, 18.765, 18.780, 18.790,
18.795 and 18.810.
Attached are the Site Plan, Vicinity Map and Applicant's Statement/Plans for your review. From
information supplied by various,departments and agencies and from other information available to our staff, a
report and recommendation will be prepared and a decision will be rendered on the proposal in the near
fufure. If you wish to comment on this application, WE NEED YOUR COMMENTS BACK BY:
JUNE 25 2003. You may use the space provided below or attach a separate letter to return your comments.
ou are una le to res ond b the above date, please phone the staff contact noted above with your
comments and con irm your comments in writing as soon as possible. If you have any questions, contact the
Tigard Planning Division, 13125 SW Hall Boulevard, Tigard, OR 97223.
PLEASE CHECK THE FOLLOWING ITEMS THAT APPLY:
_ We have reviewed the proposal and have no objections to it.
Please contact of our office.
Please refer to the enclosed letter.
� Written comments provided below:
T�C' PRoX�h�T� 0� TH� N�w A D/'7ii� I3G,DG Ta Ty� Exisr iN� cyv.ecy
�v/L.L R�Q v/Q� /�on iF�cA Tio�uS �� Tfi� G'X�s irr�G G/`��R L N. Tiy�
/70D/F/GAT/dNS w•�c c N��� i �-/,e. t,v A�s w�r�� PA��1��TS AN�
naSS/�C y N D aPE�u�NGS �Doon,s ) /ucw �,�/'-fiN �Ui�DiNG- [,•1/C- G /�AN� To
l7Gc�T A��G APP��C�IS �� coDFS:
{Tg1�1 ��� �AV� F��J[G'��� ��F/D F1 r L"!i T//J�i tAJ// /� / /��1
IName & Number of Person(s) Commenting: � �' �j/��`1 � ��,/�� v�, �/ �(��
J
REQUEST FOR COMMENTS CITVOFTIGARD
Community�Development
SkapingA Better Community
DATE: lune 11,2003 RECEIVED PLqNNING
T0: Dennis Koellermeier,Operatlons Mana9er/Water Deaartment JUN 1 3 2003
FROM: City of Tigard Planning Diuision CITY OF TIGARD
STAFF CONTACT: Brad Kilby,Associate Planner[x24341
Phone: [5031639-41n/Fax: [5031684-]291
CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT[CUPI 2003-00005
➢ TIGARD CNURCN OF GOD ERPANSIONQ
REQUEST: The applicant is seeking Conditional Use approval to expand the existing facility by 2,875
square feet for administrative offices and classrooms, and make site modifications to the parking and
landscaped areas. LOCATION: 15670 SW 98�' Avenue; WCTM 2S111 CD, Tax Lot 300. ZONE: R-7:
Medium-Density Residential District. The R-7 zoning district is designed to accommodate attached single-
family homes, detached single-family homes with or without accessory residential units, at a minimum lot
size of 5,000 square feet, and duplexes, at a minimum lot size of 10,000 square feet. Mobile home parks
and subdivisions are also permitted outright. Religious Institutions, some civic, and institutional uses are
also permitted conditionally. APPLICABLE REVIEW CRITERIA: Community Development Code
Chapters: 18.330, 18.360, 18.390, 18.510, 18.705, 18.725, 18.745, 18.755, 18.765, 18.780, 18.790,
18.795 and 18.810.
Attached are the Site Plan, Vicinity Map and Applicant's StatementlPlans for your review. From
information supplied by various,departments and agencies and from other information available to our staff, a
report and recommendation will be prepared and a decision will be rendered on the proposal in the near
future. If you wish to comment on this application, WE NEED YOUR COMMENTS BACK BY:
JUNE 25 2003. You may use the space provided below or attach a separate letter to return your comments.
�ou are una le to respond by the above date, please phone the staff contact noted above with your
comments and confirm your comments in writing as soon as possible. If you have any questions, contact the
Tigard Planning Division, 13125 SW Hall Boulevard, Tigard, OR 97223.
PLEASE CHECK THE FOLLOWING ITEMS THAT APPLY:
_ We have reviewed the proposal and have no objections to it.
Please contact of our office.
Please refer to the enclose etter.
� Written comments provided below:
• c�c. � � du�c 4
' � �b�ae!
c7
_ �
�i ,�v mn rri o�i� � �Z<a ev�,�i,Glt ald��t�sr0l�
Name & Number of Person(s) Commenting:
REQUEST FOR COMMENTS CITYOFTIOARD
Community�DeveCopment
SFiapingA BetterCommunity
DATE: lune 11,2003
T0: PER ATTACHED
FROM: Cit�of Ti9ard Plannin9 Diuision
STAFF CONTACT: Brad IGlby,Associate Planner[x24341
Phone: [5031639-41n/Fax: [5031684-1291
CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT[CUPI 2003-00005
➢ TIGARD CHURCH OF GOD EKPANSION Q
REQUEST: The applicant is seeking Conditional Use approval to expand the existing facility by 2,875
square feet for administrative offices and classrooms, and make site modifications to the parking and
landscaped areas. LOCATION: 15670 SW 98�' Avenue; WCTM 2S111 CD, Tax Lot 300. ZONE: R-7:
Medium-Density Residential District. The R-7 zoning district is designed to accommodate attached single-
family homes, detached single-family homes with or without accessory residential units, at a minimum lot
size of 5,000 square feet, and duplexes, at a minimum lot size of 10,000 square feet. Mobile home parks
and subdivisions are also permitted outright. Religious Institutions, some civic, and institutional uses are
also permitted conditionally. APPLICABLE REVIEW CRITERIA: Community Development Code
Chapters: 18.330, 18.360, 18.390, 18.510, 18.705, 18.725, 18.745, 18.755, 18.765, 18.780, 18.790,
18.795 and 18.810.
Attached are the Site Plan, Vicinity Map and Applicant's StatementlPlans for your review. From
information supplied by various.departments and agencies and from other information available to our staff, a
report and recommendation will be prepared and a decision will be rendered on the proposal in the near
fu{ure. If you wish to comment on this application, WE NEED YOUR COMMENTS BACK BY:
JUNE 25 2003. You may use the space provided below or attach a separate letter to return your comments.
ou are una le to res ond b the above date, please phone the staff contact noted above with your
comments and con irm your comments in writing as soon as possible. If you have any questions, contact the
Tigard Planning Division, 13125 SW Hall Boulevard, Tigard, OR 97223.
PLEASE CHECK THE FOLLOWING ITEMS THAT APPLY:
_ We have reviewed the proposal and have no objections to it.
Please contact of our office.
Please refer to the enclosed letter.
_ Written comments provided below:
Name & Number of Person(s) Commenting:
. - . CITY TIGARD REQUEST FOR C0� :NTS I��
NOTIFICATION LIST FOR LAND USE & COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT APPLICATIONS
FILE NOS.: � lJl ���1-'� -�^r.�� FILE NAME: % ; L:h �;- -. �n �(
CIflZEN INYOLYEMENT TEAMS
14-DAY PENDING APPLICATION NOTICE TO CIT AREA: ❑Central ❑East �South ❑West OProposal Descrip.in Library CIT Book
CITY OFfiCES
_}ONG RANGE PIANNING/Barbara Shields,Planning Mgc _COMMUNITY�VLPMNT.DEPTJPIanning-Engineering Techa ��LICE DEPTJJim Wdf,Crime Prevention Officer
1�BUILDING DIVISION/Gary Lampella,Building Official �EtJGINEERING OEPTJBrian Rager,Ovlpmnt.Review Engineer� ATER DEPTJOennis Kcellertneier,Operatans Mgr.
CITY ADMINISTRATIOWCathy WheaUey,City Recorder y PUBIIC WORKS/John Roy.Property Manager PUBLIC WORKS/Matt Stine,Urban Forester
�PLANNER—POST PROJECT SITE IF A PUBLIC HEARING ITEM-10 BUSINESS DAYS PRIOR TO THE PUBLIC HEARING! _C.DJSherman Casper,Permit Coord.(SDwCUP re:T1F1
SPECIAL DISTRICTS
TUAL.HILLS PARK 8 REC.DISL�� TUALATIN VALLEY FIRE 8 RESCUE� _ TUALATIN VALLEY WATER OISTRICT� � CLEANWATER SERVICES♦
Planning Manager Fire Marshall Administrative Office Lee WalkerlSWM Program
v 15707 SW Walker Road Washington County Fire District PO Box 745 155 N.First Avenue
BeaveAon,OR 97006 (place in pick-up box) Beaverton,OR 97075 Hilisboro,OR 97724
LOCAL AND STATE IURIS01CTI0NS
CITY OF BEAVERTON � ClTY OF TUALATIN � OR.DEPT.OF FISH&WILDLIFE OR.OIV.OF STATE LANDS
Planning Manager Planning Manager 2501 SW First Avenue Je�nifer Goodridge
I�sh Bunnell,o���s�� 18880 SW Martinaai Avenue PO Box 59 775 Summer SVeet NE
PO Box 4755 TualaGn,OR 97062 Portland,OR 97207 Salem,OR 97301-1279
Beaverton,OR 97076
_ OR.PUB.UTILITIES COMM.
METRO-LAND USE 8 PLANNING � _OR.DEPT.OF GEO.8 MINERAL IND. 550 Capitol Street NE
CITY OF OURHAM � 600 NE Grand Avenue 800 NE Oregon Street,Suite 5 Salem,OR 97310-1380
City Manager Portland,OR 97232-2736 Portland,OR 97232
PO Box 23483 Bob Knight,DalaResourceCcyMer(ZCA) US ARMY CORPS.OF ENG.
Dufiam,OR 97281-3483 Paulette Allen,�wmMar��.c�m�o� OR.DEPT.OF LAND CONSERV.&DVLP Kathry.n Harris
_ Mel Huie,c.�va�c�a:wa.ccPazon� Larry French�co�.r�,a�,a�oNVi RouGng CENWP-OP-G
CITY OF KING CIN� _ Jennifer Budhabhatti,Regional Planner(Wellands) 635 Capitol SVeet NE,Suite 150 PO Box 2946
City Manager _ C.D.Manager,GronM Managemerrt Serv�[es Salem,OR 97301-2540 Portland,OR 97208-2946
15300 SW 116th Avenue
Ki�g City,OR 97224 WASHINGT�N COUNTY�
OR.DEPT.OF ENERGY�Poweru�es m nrea) _OR.DEPT OF AVIATION�MOOOPo�a Towars� Dept.of land Use&Transp.
Bonneville Power Administration Tom Highland,Vlanninp 155 N.First Avenue
CITY OF LAKE OSWEGO� Routing TTRC—Attn: Renae FeRera 3040 25th Street,SE Suite 350,MS 13
Planning Director PO Box 3621 Salem,OR 97310 Hillsboro.OR 97124
PO Box 369 PoNand,oR 97208-3621 Brent Curtis ccPa�
Lake Oswego,OR 97034 _Gregg Leion�cva�
_ OR.DEPT.OF ENVIRON.QUALITY(DEQ) ODOT,REGION 1 � Anne LaMountain�icauRe�
CITY OF PORTLAND (NOUIy for WeUands and Potential Envi�onmernal Impacts) Marah Danielson,Devebpi�enl Review CaoNinator Phil Healy��cauae�
Planning 8ureau Director Regional Administrator Carl Toland, Right-of-Way 5ection Nape�� Steve Conway�c�.�n�.�
1900 SW 4`"Avenue,Suite 410U 2020 SW Fourth Avenue,Suite 400 123 NW Flanders Sr.Cartographer«PNZO.,�MS,�
Portland,OR 97201 Portland,OR 97201-4987 Portland,OR 97209-4037 Jim Nims�zv.�Ms�s
_Doria Mateja�zca>Ms u
WA.CO.CONSOLIDATED COMMUNIC.AGENCY(WCCCA)"911"(Manopola iowers) ODOT�REGION 1 -DISTRICT 2A�
Dave Austin Jane Estes,a�n sv�ax��
PO Box 6375 5440 SW Westgate Drive,Suite 350
Beaverton,OR 97007-0375 Portland,OR 97221-2414
UTILITY PROVIDERS AND SPECIAL A6ENCIES
PORTLANO WESTERN RlR,BURLINGTON NORTHERNlSANTA FE R/R,OREGON ELECTRIC R/R(Budington NonhernlSan�a Fe R/R Predecessory
Robert I.Melbo,President&General Manager
110 W. tOth Avenue
Albany,OR 97321 � K
SOUTHERN PACIFIC TRANS.CO.R/R METRO AREA COMMUNICATIONS AT&T CABLE '�'�RI-MET TRANSIT DVLPMT.
Clifford C.Cabe,Construction Engineer Debra Palmer�a�.aw�a,y� Pat McGann (I(PmjecY i5 Wiflwn`/.Mile of a Transil RoUe)
5424 SE McLoughlin Boulevard Twin Oaks Technology Cencer 14200 SW Brigadoon Court Ben Baldwin,Project Planner
Portland,OR 97232 1815 NW 169th Place,S-6020 Beaverton,OR 97005 710 NE Holladay SUeet
averton,OR 97006-4886 Portland,OR 97232
�PORTLAND GENERAL ELECTRIC �W NATURAL GAS COMPANY ,�VERIZON QWEST COMMUNICATIONS
Ken Gu6emez,Svc.Design Consultant Scott Palmer,Engineering Coord. Ken Perdue,Engineering Patty S[ambaugh,Engineering
9480 SW Boeckman Road 220 NW Second Avenue PO Box 1100 8021 SW Capitol Hill Rd,Rm 110
dsonville,OR 97070 Portland,OR 97209-3991 Beaverton,OR 97075-1100 Portland,OR 97219
TIGARDlfUALATIN SCHOOL DIST.#23J_BEAVERTON SCHOOL OIST.#48 COMCAST CABLE CORP. AT&T CABLE�.,,.E�Na,�.w�n
Marsha Butler,AdminisVative O�ces Jan Youngquist,Oemographics Melody Malone �iana Carpenter
6960 SW Sandburg SUeet 16550 SW Merlo Road 9605 SW Nimbus Avenue,Bldg.12 3500 SW Bond Street
Tigard,OR 97223-8039 Beaverton,OR 97006-5152 Beaverton,OR 97008 Portland,OR 97232
+IF INDICATES AUTOMATIC NOTIFICATION IN COMPLIANCE WITH INTERGOVERNMENTAL AGREEMENT IF WITHIN 500' OF THE SUBJECT PROPERTT FOR ANYIALL
CITY PROJECTS(Project Planner Is Respoosible For Indicating Parties To NOtlfy�. h:�patty�maslers\Request ForComments Notificatiai Lisl2.doc (Revised: 3I25/03)
!� Bradley Kilby-Tigard Church of God Exp� ��on.doc Page 1 '
f
TUALATIN VALLEY FIRE & RESCUE • SOUTH DIVISION
COMMUNITY SERVICE:S • OPGRA"I'IONS • FIRf PRI{VFN"I ION
June 18,2003 �
I
Brad Kilby,Associate Planner I
City of Tigard
13125 SW Hall Blvd
Tigard,OR 97223 �
Re: Tigard Church of God Expansion
I
i
Dear Brad, �
I have reviewed the submittal for the above named project and have the following comments:
1) FIRE APPARATUS ACCE5S ROAD DISTANCE FROM BUILDING AND TURNAROUNDS: Access roads shall be
within 150 feet of all portions of the exterior wall of the first story of the building as measured by an approved route M
around the exterior of the building. An approved turnaround is required if the remaining distance to an approved !
intersecting roadway,as measured along the fire apparatus acccss road,is grcater than l50 feet.(UFC Sec.902.2.I) �
2) DEAD END ROADS: Dead end fire apparatus access roads in excess of 150 feet in length shall be provided with an l
approved wrnaround. Diagrams of approved turnarounds are available from the fire district. (UFC Sec.902.2.2.4) �
4
3) PAINTF,n CURBS: Where required,fire apparatus access roadway curbs shall be painted yellow and marked"NO j
PARKING FIRE LANE"at each 25 feet. Lettering shall have a stroke of not less than one inch wide by six inches {
high. Lettering shall be white on red or black on yellow background. (UFC Sec.901.4.5.2) �
4) COMMERCIAL BUILDINGS-REOUIRED F(RE FLOW: The required fire flow for the building shall not exceed 3,000 I
gallons per minute(GPM)or the available GPM in the water delivery system at 20 psi,whichever is less. A worksheet �
for calculating the required fire flow is available from the Fire Marshal's Office.(UFC Sec.903.3)
5) COMMERCIAL BUILDINGS-FIRE HYDRANTS: No portion of the exterior of a commercial building shall be located
more than 250 feet from a fire hydrant when measured in an approved manner around the outside of the building and
along an approved fire apparatus access roadway. Any hydrants that are left over from the minimum number of
hydrant calculations may be full filled by hydrants that are up to 500 feet from any point of the building. The fire
Prevention Ordinance has furthcr rcquirements that need to be used for acceptance and placement of�re hydrants.
(UFC Sec.903.4.2.1)
6) COMMERCIAL BUILDINGS-MINIMUM NUMBER OF F1RE HYDRANTS: The minimum number of fire hydrants
for a building shall be based on thc required fire flow prior to giving credit for fire protection systems divided by 1500.
If the answer is equal to or greater than x.5 the next whole number of hydrants shall be used. There shall not be less
than 2 hydrants per building. (UFC Sec.903.4.2.1)
Considerations for placing fire hvdrants shall be as follows: �
• Existing hydrants in the area may be used to meet the required number of hydrants;however,hydrants that are over 500
feet away from the nearest point of the subject building shall not contribute to the required number of hydrants. �
� • Hydrants that are separated from the subject building by railroad tracks shall not contribute to the required number of
hydrants. i
I
• Hydrants that are separated from the subject building by divided highway,freeway,or heavily traveled collector streets I
shall not contribute to the required number of hydrants. �
�
I
7401 SW Washo Court,Suitc]O1•Tualatin,Oregon 97062•TeL(503)612-7000•Fax(503)612-7003•www.tvfr.com �I
i
.
!� Bradley Kilby-Tigard Church of God Exp� ��on.doc Page 2 I
�
• Hydrants that are accessible only by a bridge shall be acceptable to contribute to the required numbcr of hydrants only if
approved by the Chief.
• Private hydrants or public hydrants that are on adjacent private property shall not contribute to the required number of
hydrants for the subject building.
Exception:The use of hydrants located on other private property may be considered if their locations and access are
encumbered in a legal document(such as deed restriction)by the owners of the involved parcels of property. The
encumbrance may be lifted only after approvals by the Chief on behalf of the fire department and any other
governmental agencies that may require approval.
• When evaluating the placement of hydrants at apartment or industrial complexes the first hydrant(s)to be placed shall be at
the primary access and any secondary access to the site. After these hydrants have been placed other hydrants shall be
sited to meet the above requirements for spacing and minimum number of hydrants. (UFC Sec.903.4.2.1.1)
7) ACCESS AND FIRE FIGHTING WATER SUPPLY DURING CONSTRUCTION: Approved fire apparatus access I
roadways and fire fighting water supplies shall be installed and operational prior to any other construction on the site I
or subdivision. (UFC Sec.8704)
Please contact me at(503)612-7010 with any additional questions.
Sincerely,
Eric T. McMullen
Eric T. McMullen
Deputy Firc Marshal
MEMORANDUM
CITY OF TIGARD, OREGON
DATE: 07/17/03
TO: Brad Kilby, Associate Planner
FROM: Kim McMillan, Development Review Engineer
RE: CUP2003-00005
Access Manaqement (Section 18.705.030.H)
Section 18.705.030.H.1 states that an access report shall be submitted with
all new development proposals which verifies design of driveways and
streets are safe by meeting adequate stacking needs, sight distance and
deceleration standards as set by ODOT, Washington County, the City and
AASHTO.
The proposed addition to this facility is to provide office space for current staff
members. The applicant has indicated that the addition will not generate new
trips to the church site. There are two existing driveways that access ggtn
Avenue and the applicant is not proposing any changes to these driveways.
Section 18.705.030.H.2 states that driveways shall not be permitted to be
placed in the influence area of collector or arterial street intersections.
Influence area of intersections is that area where queues of traffic
commonly form on approach to an intersection. The minimum driveway
setback from a collector or arterial street intersection shall be150 feet,
measured from the right-of-way line of the intersecting street to the throat
of the proposed driveway. The setback may be greater depending upon the
influence area, as determined from City Engineer review of a traffic impact
report submitted by the applicant's traffic engineer. In a case where a
project has less than 150 feet of street frontage, the applicant must explore
any option for shared access with the adjacent parcel. If shared access is
not possible or practical, the driveway shall be placed as far from the
intersection as possible.
The existing driveways are not located within the influence area of collector or
arterial streets.
Section 18.705.030.H.3 and 4 states that the minimum spacing of driveways
and streets along a collector shall be 200 feet. The minimum spacing of
driveways and streets along an arterial shall be 600 feet. The minimum
spacing of local streets along a local street shall be 125 feet.
ENGINEERING COMMENTS CUP2003-00005 Tigard Church of God PAGE 1
The existing driveways are located along 98th Avenue, which is designated as a
Neighborhood Route.
Street And Utilitv Improvements Standards (Section 18.810):
Chapter 18.810 provides construction standards for the implementation of
public and private facilities and utilities such as streets, sewers, and
drainage. The applicable standards are addressed below:
Streets:
Improvements:
Section 18.810.030.A.1 states that streets within a development and streets
adjacent shall be improved in accordance with the TDC standards.
Section 18.810.030.A.2 states that any new street or additional street width
planned as a portion of an existing street shall be dedicated and improved
in accordance with the TDC.
Minimum Rights-of-Way and Street Widths: Section 18.810.030.E requires a
Neighborhood Route to have a 54 right-of-way width and 32-foot paved
section. Other improvements required may include on-street parking,
sidewalks and bikeways, underground utilities, street lighting, storm
drainage, and street trees. ,
This site lies adjacent to SW 98th Avenue, which is classified as a Neighborhood
Route on the City of Tigard Transportation Plan Map. At present, there is
approximately 55 feet of ROW, according to the most recent tax assessor's map.
The applicant has submitted a copy of a Street Dedication document from 1978
that shows an additional 5 feet of ROW dedicated to the public. This brings the
total ROW along the frontage to 60 feet. This exceeds the minimum ROW
required for a Neighborhood Route.
SW 98th is fully improved except for street trees. The applicant's plan indicates
they will plant street trees according to the required spacing. The applicant has
requested that they be allowed to plant the street trees east of the sidewalk
because the existing planter strip is only 4' wide. The street trees may be
planted east of the sidewalk as long as they are at least 2' away.
Block Designs - Section 18.810.040.A states that the length, width and shape
of blocks shall be designed with due regard to providing adequate building
sites for the use contemplated, consideration of needs for convenient
access, circulation, control and safety of street traffic and recognition of
limitations and opportunities of topography.
ENGINEERING COMMENTS CUP2003-00005 Tigard Church of God PAGE 2
Block Sizes: Section 18.810.040.B.1 states that the perimeter of blocks
formed by streets shall not exceed 1,800 feet measured along the right-of-
way line except:
• Where street location is precluded by natural topography, wetlands or
other bodies of water or, pre�xisting development or;
• For blocks adjacent to arterial streets, limited access highways, major
collectors or railroads.
• For non-residential blocks in which internal public circulation provides
equivalent access.
PLANNING
Section 18.810.040.B.2 also states that bicycle and pedestrian connections
on public easements or right-of-ways shall be provided when full street
connection is not possible. Spacing between connections shall be no
more than 330 feet, except where precluded by environmental or
topographical constraints, existing development patterns, or strict
adherence to other standards in the code.
PLANNING
Lots - Size and Shape: Section 18.810.060(A) prohibits lot depth from being
more than 2.5 times the average lot width, unless the parcel is less than 1.5
times the minimum lot size of the applicable zoning district.
PLANNING
Lot Frontage: Section 18.810.060(B) requires that lots have at least 25 feet of
frontage on public or private streets, other than an alley. In the case of a land
partition, 18.420.050.A.4.c applies, which requires a parcel to either have a
minimum 15-foot frontage or a minimum 15-foot wide recorded access
easement. In cases where the lot is for an attached single-family dwelling
unit, the frontage shall be at least 15 feet.
PLANNING
Sidewalks: Section 18.810.070.A requires that sidewalks be constructed to
meet City design standards and be located on both sides of arterial,
collector and local residential streets. Private streets and industrial streets
shall have sidewalks on at least one side.
There is an existing sidewalk along 98th Avenue. No sidewalk improvements are
required.
Sanitary Sewers:
ENGINEERING COMMENTS CUP2003-00005 Tigard Church of God PAGE 3
Sewers Required: Section 18.810.090.A requires that sanitary sewer be
installed to serve each new development and to connect developments to
existing mains in accordance with the provisions set forth in Design and
Construction Standards for Sanitary and Surface Water Management (as
adopted by Clean Water Services in 1996 and including any future
revisions or amendments) and the adopted policies of the comprehensive
plan.
Over-sizing: Section 18.810.090.0 states that proposed sewer systems
shall include consideration of additional development within the area as
projected by the Comprehensive Plan.
The closest sewer line is an 8-inch line in Brentwood Place to the east. The
applicant's plan shows a sewer lateral from the proposed addition connecting to
the sewer located in Brentwood Place.
Storm Drainage:
General Provisions: Section 18.810.100.A requires developers to make
adequate provisions for storm water and flood water runoff.
Accommodation of Upstream Drainage: Section 18.810.100.0 states that a
culvert or other drainage facility shall be large enough to accommodate
potential runoff from its entire upstream drainage area, whether inside or
outside the development. The City Engineer shall approve the necessary
size of the facility, based on the provisions of Design and Construction
Standards for Sanitary and Surface Water Management (as adopted by
Clean Water Services in 2000 and including any future revisions or
amendments).
There are no existing upstream drainage areas that affect this site.
EfFect on Downstream Drainage: Section 18.810.100.D states that where it
is anticipated by the City Engineer that the additional runoff resulting from
the development will overload an existing drainage facility, the Director and
Engineer shall withhold approval of the development until provisions have
been made for improvement of the potential condition or until provisions
have been made for storage of additional runoff caused by the
development in accordance with the Design and Construction Standards
for Sanitary and SurFace Water Management (as adopted by Clean Water
Services in 2000 and including any future revisions or amendments).
In 1997, Clean Water Services (CWS) completed a basin study of Fanno Creek
and adopted the Fanno Creek Watershed Management Plan. Section V of that
ENGINEERING COMMENTS CUP2003-00005 Tigard Church of God PAGE 4
plan includes a recommendation that local governments institute a stormwater
detention/effective impervious area reduction program resulting in no net
increase in storm peak flows up to the 25-year event. The City will require that
all new developments resulting in an increase of impervious surfaces provide
onsite detention facilities, unless the development is located adjacent to Fanno
Creek. For those developments adjacent to Fanno Creek, the storm water runoff
will be permitted to discharge without detention.
The net new impervious surface area is only 3233 sf. Therefore, detention is not
required. The stormwater runoff from the new impervious surface will be
collected in a 4-inch rain drain that will connect to a 6-inch storm line. The 6-inch
line will transmit the flow to a water quality swale on the south side of the parking
lot. The outFlow from the swale will connect to the existing catch basin at the
south west corner of the parking lot.
Bikeways and Pedestrian Pathways:
Bikeway Extension: Section 18.810.110.A states that developments
adjoining proposed bikeways identified on the City's adopted
pedestrian/bikeway plan shall include provisions for the future extension of
such bikeways through the dedication of easements or right-of-way.
SW 98th Avenue is designated as a bicycle facility. There is an existing bikeway
along the east side of 98th Avenue.
Utilities:
Section 18.810.120 states that all utility lines, but not limited to those
required for electric, communication, lighting and cable television services
and related facilities shall be placed underground, except for surface
mounted transformers, surface mounted connection boxes and meter
cabinets which may be placed above ground, temporary utility service
facilities during construction, high capacity electric lines operating at
50,000 volts or above, and:
• The developer shall make all necessary arrangements with the serving
utility to provide the underground services;
• The City reserves the right to approve location of all surface mounted
facilities;
• All underground utilities, including sanitary sewers and storm drains
installed in streets by the developer, shall be constructed prior to the
surfacing of the streets; and
• Stubs for service connections shall be long enough to avoid disturbing
the street improvements when service connections are made.
ENGINEERING COMMENTS CUP2003-00005 Tigard Church of God PAGE 5
Exception to Under-Grounding Requirement: Section 18.810.120.0 states
that a developer shall pay a fee in-lieu of under-grounding costs when the
development is proposed to take place on a street where existing utilities
which are not underground will serve the development and the approval
authority determines that the cost and technical difficulty of under-
grounding the utilities outweighs the benefit of under-grounding in
conjunction with the development. The determination shall be on a case-
by-case basis. The most common, but not the only, such situation is a
short frontage development for which under-grounding would result in the
placement of additional poles, rather than the removal of above-ground
utilities facilities. An applicant for a development which is served by
utilities which are not underground and which are located across a public
right-of-way from the applicant's property shall pay a fee in-lieu of under-
grounding.
There are existing overhead utility lines along the frontage of SW 98�' Avenue. If
the fee in-lieu is proposed, it is equal to $ 27.50 per lineal foot of street frontage
that contains the overhead lines. The frontage along this site is 395 lineal feet;
therefore the fee would be $ 10,862.00.
ADDITIONAL CITY AND/OR AGENCY CONCERNS WITH STREET AND
UTILITY IMPROVEMENT STANDARDS:
Public Water System:
This site is served by City of Tigard Water. The applicant indicates the existing
water service is adequate to serve the addition.
Storm Water Qualitv:
The City has agreed to enforce Surface Water Management (SWM)
regulations established by Clean Water Services (CWS) Design and
Construction Standards (adopted by Resolution and Order No. 00-7) which
require the construction of on-site water quality facilities. The facilities
shall be designed to remove 65 percent of the phosphorus contained in 100
percent of the storm water runoff generated from newly created impervious
surFaces. In addition, a maintenance plan shall be submitted indicating the
frequency and method to be used in keeping the facility maintained
through the year.
Prior to construction, the applicant shall submit plans and calculations for a water
quality facility that will meet the intent of the CWS Design Standards. In addition,
the applicant shall submit a maintenance plan for the facility that must be
reviewed and approved by the City prior to construction.
ENGINEERING COMMENTS CUP2003-00005 Tigard Church of God PAGE 6
? �PUT CASE NOTE/N P*P /NDICATlNG !F WE NEED TO CHARGE QUALITY
' OR ���dNT�TV cnr_�c iFOR PERMlT TECHS & PLANS EXAM/NER)J
To ensure compliance with Clean Water Services design and construction
standards, the applicant shall employ the design engineer responsible for the
design and specifications of the private water quality facility to perform
construction and visual observation of the water quality facility for compliance
with the design and specifications. These inspections shall be made at
significant stages throughout the project and at completion of the construction.
Prior to final building inspection, the design engineer shall provide the City of
Tigard (Inspection Supervisor) with written confirmation that the water quality
facility is in compliance with the design and specifications.
Gradinq and Erosion Control:
CWS Design and Construction Standards also regulate erosion control to
reduce the amount of sediment and other pollutants reaching the public
storm and surface water system resulting from development, construction,
grading, excavating, clearing, and any other activity which accelerates
erosion. Per CWS regulations, the applicant is required to submit an
erosion control plan for City review and approval prior to issuance of City
permits.
A final grading and erosion control plan will be reviewed by the Building Division
as a part of the site permit process.
Recommendations:
THE FOLLOWING CONDITIONS SHALL BE SATISFIED PRIOR TO
ISSUANCE OF THE SITE PERMIT:
Submit to the Engineering Department (Kim McMillan, 639-4171, ext. 2642)
for review and approval:
. A Public Facility Improvement (PFI) permit is required for this project to
cover the street trees and any other work in the public right-of-way. Six (6)
sets of detailed public improvement plans shall be submitted for review to
the Engineering Department. NOTE: these plans are in addition to any
drawings required by the Building Division and should only include sheets
relevant to public improvements. Public Facility Improvement (PFI) permit
plans shall conform to City of Tigard Public Improvement Design Standards,
which are available at City Hall and the City's web page
(www.ci.tic�ard.or.us).
ENGINEERING COMMENTS CUP2003-00005 Tigard Church of God PAGE 7
. The PFI permit plan submittal shall include the exact legal name, address
and telephone number of the individual or corporate entity who will be
designated as the "Permittee", and who will provide the financial assurance
for the public improvements. For example, specify if the entity is a
corporation, limited partnership, LLC, etc. Also specify the state within which
the entity is incorporated and provide the name of the corporate contact
person. Failure to provide accurate information to the Engineering
Department will delay processing of project documents.
. The applicanYs construction plans shall show planting of street trees on the
east side of 98�' Avenue.
. The applicant shall provide connection of proposed addition to the public
sanitary sewerage system. A connection permit is required to connect to the
existing public sanitary sewer system.
. The applicant shall provide an on-site water quality facility as required by
Clean Water Services Design and Construction Standards (adopted by
Resolution and Order No. 00-7). Final plans and calculations shall be
submitted to the Engineering Department (Kim McMillan) for review and
approval prior to issuance of the site permit. In addition, a proposed
maintenance plan shall be submitted along with the plans and calculations
for review and approval.
. An erosion control plan shall be provided as part of the Public Facility
Improvement (PFI) permit drawings. The plan shall conform to the "Erosion
Prevention and Sediment Control Design and Planning Manual, December
2000 edition."
THE FOLLOWING CONDITIONS SHALL BE SATISFIED PRIOR TO A FINAL
BUILDING INSPECTION:
Submit to the Engineering Department (Kim McMillan, 639-4171, ext. 2642)
for review and approval:
. Prior to a final building inspection, the applicant shall complete any work in
the public right-of-way (or public easement)and obtain approval from the
Engineering Department.
. The applicant shall either place the existing overhead utility lines along SW
98tn Avenue underground as a part of this project, or they shall pay the fee
in-lieu of undergrounding. The fee shall be calculated by the frontage of the
site that is parallel to the utility lines and will be $ 27.50 per lineal foot. If the
ENGINEERING COMMENTS CUP2003-00005 Tigard Church of God PAGE 8
fee option is chosen, the amount will be $ 10,862.00 and it shall be paid prior
to a final building inspection
� . Prior to final building inspection, the applicant shall pay the fee in-lieu of
.
constructing an on-site water quantity facility. The fee is based on the total
area of new impervious surfaces in the proposed development and was
calculated to be $�1
. To ensure compliance with Clean Water Services design and construction
standards, the applicant shall employ the design engineer responsible for
the design and specifications of the private water quality facility to perform
construction and visual observation of the water quality facility for
compliance with the design and specifications. These inspections shall be
made at significant stages, and at completion of the construction. Prior to
final building inspection, the design engineer shall provide the City of
Tigard (Inspection Supervisor) with written confirmation that the water
quality facility is in compliance with the design and specifications. Staff
Contact: Hap Watkins, Building Division.
ENGINEERING COMMENTS CUP2003-00005 Tigard Church of God PAGE 9
. � .
AFFIDAVIT OF POSTING NOTICE OF A LAND USE PROPOSAL
IMPORTANT NOTICE: THIS AFFIDAVIT MUST BE ACCOMPANIED BY A COPY OF THE NOTICE THAT WAS POSTED
ON THE SITE.
In the Matter of the Proposed Land Use Applications for:
Land Use File Nos.: CUP2003-00005
Land Use File Name: TIGARD CHURCH OF GOD EXPANSION
I, Brad Kilby, Associate Planner for the City of Tigard, do affirm that I posted notice of the land use
proposal affecting the land located at (state the approximate location(s) IF no address(s) and/or tax
lot(s) currently registered) �Sr_'10 ��.� n`�~ £��f , and
did personally post notice of the Public Hearing on the proposed land use application(s) by means of
weatherproof posting in the general vicinity of the affected territory, a copy of said notice being
hereto attached and by reference made a part hereof, on the_� day of ��,��, , 2003.
�
� ,��
��'cr^.'�, i
Signature of erson W o Perfor ed Posting
(In the presence of the Notary)
(THIS SECTION FOR A STATE OF OREGON, NOTARY PUBLIC TO COMPLETE/NOTARIZE)
STATE OF OREGON )
County of Washington ) ss.
�
Subscribed and sworn/affi ed before me on the � day of , 20�
:-o OFFICIAL SEAL
;b J BENGTSON
�` NOTARY PUBLIC-OFEGON r�� �
�� COMMISSION NO.368086
MY COMMISSION E�XPIRES APR.27,2007
NO RY PU C OF OREG N
My Commission Expires: �
�- a�1G-�
h:lloginlpattylmasters�affidavit of posting for applicant to post public hearing.doc
N4TICE � F PUBLIC HEARING �
The following will be considered by �the Ti ard Hearin s Officer on Monda Jul 28 2003 at 7:00 PM at the Tigard
Civic Center - Town Hall, 13125 SW Ha v ., igar , regon. oth pu ic ora an wri en es imony is invited.
The public hearing on this matter will be conducted in accordance with the Tigard Municipal Code and the rules of
�rocedure adopted by the Council and available at City Hall or the rules of procedure set forth in Chapter 18.390.
estimony may be submitted in writing prior to or at the public hearing or verbally at the public hearing only. Failure
to raise an issue in person or by letter at some point prior to.the close of the hearing accompanied by statements or
evidence sufficient to afford the decision-maker an opportunity to respond to the issue precludes appeal to the Land
Use Board of Appeal based on that issue. Failure to specify the criterion from the Community.Development Code or
Comprehensive Plan at which a comment is directed precludes an appeal based on that criterion.
A copy of the application .and all documents and evidence submitted by or on behalf of the applicant. and the
applicable criteria are available for inspection at no cost. A copy of the staff report will be made available for
inspection at no cost at least seven (7) days prior to the hearing, and copies for all items can also be provided at a
reasonable cost.
Further information may be obtained from the Planning Division staff contact: Brad Kilb at 13125 SW Hall Blvd.,
Tigard, Oregon 97223,by calling 503-639-4171 , or by email to bra ey ci. igar .or.us.
CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT (CUP) 2003-00005
REQUEST: The applicant is seeking Conditional Use approval to expand the existing
facility by 2,875 square feet for administrative offices and classrooms, and make site
modifications to the parking and landscaped areas. LOCATION: 15670 SW 98th Avenue;
WCTM 2S111 CD, Tax Lot 300. ZONE: R-7: Medium-Density Residential District. The
R-7 zoning district is designed to accommodate attached single-family homes, detached
single-family homes with or without accessory residential units, at a minimum lot size of
5,000 square feet, and duplexes, at a minimum lot size of 10,000 square feet. Mobile
home parks and subdivisions are also permitted outright. Religious Institutions, some
civic, and institutional uses are also permitted conditionally. APPLICABLE REVIEW
CRITERIA: Community Development Code Chapters: 18.330, 18.360, 18.390, 18.510,
18.705, 18.725, 18.745, 18.755, 18.765, 18.780, 18.790, 18.795 and 18.810.
\/ �� . .
GEOGRAPHiC iNiORMAiiON SVSTEM
AREA NOTIFIED
(500')
FOR: Jim Omundson
mm��ww ttmwmHe �
�, �_ �����-°� RE: 15670 98th Ave.
��� (2S111 CD, 300)
xnx�n� �nmaw�e --—————————
� xmraar
n^� D R
!b� t It��ii�
O , ,�..:,. ,,�.�n ,� .,�.,� D
f , �.�..
�` = n�� 11p" '"'�"'� I— Property owner information
�-- nme.a. +��f � is valid for 3 months from
a„e...�. Op a,�..„o 1,�.. n,,,,�w,,, (n the date printed on this map.
� nma�� "�e'o �
/� ti11�CN1M �
rima�aw � �
mwm � nft�ewM O
�nvwu
f111qMM �llftlr T�CM O
� 1 {TR1
TIR�N it/C �
� li111H�tp� n�
A� ritlICN71N
n ^�
"�
Onmamw nmaww
� mu�a meo�
D m � n,� �,�.
� � nvw�wr nmaNw� � n e
-- T x e w
�� nmameo nmc�wr x e� n
� �� e amat�
� nnwnir nmara� n o .
� � x a. N
fip n
x� amwM«
n
amawa ma amawtr G x �a
n�� n n � 0 100 200 300 Feet
vIQ� n w
❑ t"=240 feet
�,�..�. n,�" „� ",� ��'�,�,o �7
xmaw� n����� n
mna� n n N ��PL
��� �
nmaua.
amanw
- """"" �'TM�" "'�� riT7°'�"' t{tI1qN7N +� CityofTigard
nmea.ae� ��
m Information on Ihis map is for general location only and
R D ahould be verified with!he Developmenl Serviva Division.
73125 SW Hall Blvd
Tigard,OR 97223
Q (503)639-4771
hltp:!/ww.v.ci.tigard.or.us
Community Development Plot date:Apr 21,2003;C:lmagiclMAGIC03.APR
2S 7 71 CA-02900 2S 111 CA-02000
AKAMIAN ANDREW E& BOWERMAN KATE MADELEINE
AKAMIAN JANICE ORGILL 1996 15505 SW SUMMERFIELD LN
REVOCABLE TRUST-SURVIVOR'S TRUST TIGARD,OR 97224
15498 SW SUMMERFIELD LN
TIGARD,OR 97224
2S111CD-06200 2S111CD-05800
ALEXANDER DAVID R AND KARA D BOWMAN CORA H
9837 SW KIMBERLY DR 9600 SW BRENTWOOD PLACE
TIGARD,OR 97224 TIGARD,OR 97224
2S 111 CD-04100 2S 111 CD-09700
ARCHIBALD BESSIE W TR CAIRY MICHAEL L
PO BOX 146 9870 SW KIMBERLY DR
DUNDEE,OR 97115 TIGARD,OR 97224
2S 111 C D-09900 2S 111 CA-01400
ATWOOD SHERRI L COLTON RODNEY P TRUSTEE
9840 SW KIMBERLY DR 9645 SW SUMMERFIELD
TIGARD,OR 97224 TIGARD,OR 97224
2S 111 CD-07300 2S 111 CD-09700
BALL BARBARA R TRUST COMBS MICHAEL G AND CYNTHIA A
15740 5W SERENA CT 15890 SW SERENA CT
TIGARD,OR 97224 TIGARD,OR 97224
2S 111 DC-04500 2S111 CA-01000
BARTSCH RICHARD D&WYONA R TRS CORP OF PRESIDING BISHOP OF
9440 SW SUMMERFIELD DR CHURCH OF JESUS CHRIST LDS
TIGARD,OR 97224 50 E NORTH TEMPLE#511-4705
SALT LAKE CITY,UT &4150
2S 111 DC-05100 2S 111 DC-04200
BATES LA MAE L&FRANK E COTE'OLIVER PAUL&VIRGINIA B
15683 SW SUMMERFIELD LN 15635 SW ALDERBROOK DR
TIGARD,OR 97224 TIGARD,OR 97224
2S 111 CD-04300 2S 111 CD-06800
BIRNEY MAUD M TRUSTEE CRANE GUY R&DONNA K
9520 SW BRENTWOOD PL 9885 5W KIMBERLY DR
TIGARD,OR 97224 TIGARD,OR 97224
2S 111 CD-03300 2S111 CD-10500
BLUMENFELD ROBERT C& DIRKSEN CRAIG E&JACKIE
KATHRYN K 15775 SW 98TH AVE
9625 SW BRENTWOOD PL TIGARD,OR 97224
TIGARD,OR 97224
2S111CD-09600 2S111CD-06400
BOSTWICK PHILIP D/LAURIE A DORSETT ERNEST L I MARLENE
9890 SW KIMBERLY DR 9841 SW KIMBERLY DR
TIGARD,OR 97224 TIGARD,OR 97224
2S 111 CD-06700 2S 111 CD-02700
DUFFY GARY H AND ERAINA J HANLON GERTRUDE TRUSTEE
9855 SW KIMBERLY 15600 SW 98TH AVE
TIGARD,OR 97223 TIGARD,OR 97224
2S 117 CD-04700 2S 111 CD-10700
DUNLAP GERALD M&REBA L HANSEN ROBERT M
15980 SW BRENTWOOD CT 15802 SW 98TH AVE
TIGARD,OR 97224 TIGARD,OR 97224
2S 171 DC-04900 2S 111 CD-03500
DUNLAP WILLIAM J&MARIAN HARDY JEANNE L
15657 SW SUMMERFIELD LN 9605 SW BRENTWOOD PL
TIGARD,OR 97224 TIGARD,OR 97224
2S 111 CA-03000 2S 111 CD-01200
FIRST INTERSTATE BANK HASS PHYLLIS W
C/O ICG 9500 SW SUMMERFIELD DRIVE
PO BOX 810490 TIGARD,OR 97224
DALLAS,TX 75381
2S 111 CD-09500 2S 111 CA-03100
FORBES ROGER M&PATRICIA A HOFFMAN DONALD E&SUSAN T
9894 SW KIMBERLY DR 9485 SW SUMMERFIELD DR
TIGARD,OR 97224 TIGARD,OR 97224
2S 111 CD-00600 2S 111 CD-06500
FRISON ELIZABETH HOLMAN PAUL D&RHONDA G
15905 SW 98TH AVE 9843 SW KIMBERLY DR
TIGARD,OR 97224 TIGARD,OR 97224
2S 111 DC-04700 2S 111 CD-01600
GARD J ALLAN& HUNTER KIM C
MARGARET H 15634 SW SUMMERFIELD LN
15648 5W SUMMERFIELD PL TIGARD,OR 97224
TIGARD,OR 97223
2S 111 CD-07000 2S 111 CD-06300
GODDARD JAMES A AND ISRAEL WAYNE SITHERESA A
JANET B 9839 SW KIMBERLY DR
15790 SW SERENA CT TIGARD,OR 97224
TIGARD,OR 97223
2S 111 CD-05500 2S 111 CD-01800
GRAHAM JOHN M&LUCILLE H TRS IVERSON MAURICE S
9570 SW BRENTWOOD PL 15625 SW SUMMERFIELD LN
TIGARD,OR 97224 TIGARD,OR 97224
2S 111 CA-01600 2S 111 CD-01500
GRUGGEN ROBERT C&KIRSTEN TRS JENKINS LOUIS C TR
9585 SW SUMMERFIELD DR 15618 SW SUMMERFIELD LN
TIGARD,OR 97224 TIGARD,OR 97224
2S 111 CD-03700 2S 111 CD-04400
JIROCH CATHRYN M KYES STEPHEN G
9575 SW BRENTWOOD PL 9530 SW BRENTWOOD PL
TIGARD,OR 97223 TIGARD,OR 97224
2S�11 CA-01700 2S 111 CD-05300
JOHNSON RAY A/BEVERLY J TRUST LANGE ARTHUR K&
BY RAY A/BEVERLY J JOHNSON TRS LYNN JEAN M
PO BOX 462 15955 SW BRENTWOOD CT
SEASIDE,OR 97138 TIGARD,OR 97224
2S 111 CD-07200 2S 111 CD-06900
JOHNSON ROGER L&DONNA A LEATHERWOOD SUSAN R&
15760 SW SERENA CT OMID CYRUS
TIGARD,OR 97224 9895 SW KIMBERLY DR
TIGARD,OR 97224
2S�11 CD-02900 2S171 CD-10100
JOHNSON VERN D/NADINE L TRS LEISTRA RONALD M&ALDINE
15620 SW 98TH AVE 9815 SW KIMBERLY
TIGARD,OR 97224 TIGARD,OR 97223
25111 CD-04�00 2S 111 CD-02400
KNIGHT BETTY M L HAN CHARD M&
9545 SW BRENTWOOD PL KAT A
TIGARD,OR 97224 UNIT 0
AP
, 0
25111DC-06200 2S111CA-01900
KOENIG REVOCABLE TRUST LETT GLENN F&RUTH T
BY JUANITA KOENIG& 15521 SW SUMMERFIELD LN
KAKROLYN NEUPERT TRS TIGARD,OR 97224
9495 SW BRENTWOOD PL
TIGARD,OR 97224
25111 CD-05600 2S111 CD-03800
KOEPKE WARREN C&WINNIE LINK JOHN M
9580 SW BRENTWOOD PL 9565 SW BRENTWOOD PL
TIGARD,OR 97224 TIGARD,OR 97224
2S111CD-10600 2S111CA-01500
KROUTH DENNIS A LUTHERN CHURCH-MISSOURI SYNOD FD
15795 SW 98TH AVE Go SLEIGHT ALBERT&MARIE R
TIGARD,OR 97224 LIFE ESTATE
1333 S KIRKWOOD RD
ST LOUIS,MO 63122
2S 111 DC-04600 2S 111 CD-08800
KUHN JAMES R TR& MANZANO PHILIP A AND GERALDINE
ROBINSON SHIRLEY T TR 15920 SW SERENA CT
9470 SW SUMMERFIELD DR TIGARD,OR 97224
TIGARD,OR 97224
2S111CD-10200 2S111CD-10000
KUIPERS MARY E MCCOY JAMES L&IRENE N TRS
9820 SW KIMBERLY DR 9825 SW KIMBERLY DR
TIGARD,OR 97224 TIGARD,OR 97224
2S 111 CD-04500 2S 111 CD-04900
MCDOUGALL JAMES R&MONICA M NUTTER JUDITH A&
9540 SW BRENTWOOD PLACE QUINN DORIS G
TIGARD,OR 97224 15995 SW BRENTWOOD CT
TIGARD,OR 97224
2S 111 CD-04200 2S 111 CD-01300
MCKEAN ROBERT C&LORA M PALM BYRON S AND JANE M
9510 SW BRENTWOOD PLACE 15574 SW SUMMERFIELD LN
TIGARD,OR 97224 TIGARD,OR 97224
2S 111 CD-04800 2S 111 CD-O6000
MILES PAUL M&PERLA V PARCELL JOHN T&JOLENE C
15990 SW BRENTWOOD CT 9620 SW BRENTWOOD PL
TIGARD,OR 97224 TIGARD,OR 97224
2S111 CD-09200 2S111 CD-10400
MILLER ROBERT A&LINDA C PELZNER KAY PAULINE
15880 SW SERENA WAY CT 15755 SW 98TH AVE
TIGARD,OR 97224 TIGARD,OR 97224
2S 111 CD-02200 2S 111 CD-05900
MINER DAVID A&NEDRA SUE PERRINE CAROLINE W TR
9560 SW SUMMERFIELD DR 9610 SW BRENTWOOD PLACE
TIGARD,OR 97224 TIGARD,OR 97224
2S 111 CD-06100 2S 111 CD-05700
MOORE BRIAN J/DONNA L PETERS ALICE E
9835 SW KIMBERLY DRIVE 9590 SW BRENTWOOD PL
TIGARD,OR 97224 TIGARD,OR 97224
2S111 CD-02500 2S111 CD-01700
MOORE FAMILY TRUST PETERSEN MELVIN C
BY TRUSTEE OF MOORE FAMILY TRUST 15641 SW SUMMERFIELD LN
9660 SW SUMMERFIELD DR TIGARD,OR 97224
TIGARD,OR 97224
2S 111 DC-04000 2S 111 CD-04600
MOORE THOMAS JEWETT&D C PETERSON GLENN L&KATHERINE E
15665 SW ALDERBROOK DR 15970 SW BRENTWOOD CT
TIGARD,OR 97224 TIGARD,OR 97224
2S 111 CD-05200 2S 111 DC-06400
NELSON BARBARA J PETERSON WILLIAM D&VERNA K TR
15965 SW BRENTWOOD CT 9515 SW BRENTWOOD PL
TIGARD,OR 97223 TIGARD,OR 97224
2S 111 DC-05000 2S 111 CD-09800
NELSON GARY& PETRINA JACK M&FRANCES M
SANDRA M 9860 SW KIMBERLY DR
15671 SUMMERFIELD LN TIGARD,OR 97224
TIGARD,OR 97224
2S 111 CD-07100 2S 111 C D-09300
PIERCE HAROLD D&MARILYN K RUZICKA DIANE L
PO BOX 2316 9900 SW KIMBERLY DR
LAKE OSWEGO,OR 97035 TIGARD,OR 97223
2S111 DC-04800 2S111 CD-03400
POTTER DONALD H&MARY SAVAGE ARDETH M
15666 SW SUMMERFIELD LN 9615 SW BRENTWOOD PL
TIGARD,OR 97224 TIGARD,OR 97224
2S 111 D C-04100 2S 111 DC-06100
RADEL JOSEPH R SCHULTZ ELAINE M
15655 SW ALDERBROOK DR 9485 SW BRENTWOOD PL
TIGARD,OR 97224 TIGARD,OR 97224
2S 111 CD-03900 2S 111 CD-02800
REED KATHERINE E TR SCHUMACKER BONNIE J TRUSTEE
BY KATHERINE E REED TR 15610 SW 98TH AVE
9555 SW BRENTWOOD PL TIGARD,OR 97224
TIGARD,OR 97224
2S 111 CD-06600 2S 111 CD-05100
REED MICHAEL T SEITZINGER PEGGY E
9847 SW KIMBERLY DR 15975 SW BRENTWOOD CT
TIGARD,OR 97224 TIGARD,OR 97224
2S 111 CD-09400 2S 111 CD-03200
RENSKLEV ELLEN M SINNARD GERALDINE
9898 SW KIMBERLY DR 9635 SW BRENTWOOD PL
TIGARD,OR 97224 TIGARD,OR 97224
2s��i c�-os000 zs���co-oaeoo
RICHARDSON LYNNE L& SOLIS GUSTAVO&CAROL
RICHARDSON JEAN E 9835 SW DURHAM RD
15900 5W SERENA CT TIGARD,OR 97224
TIGARD,OR 97224
2S 111 CD-05000 2S 111 CD-00400
RIEDER T H&M FRANCINE SOUTHWEST CHURCH OF
15985 SW BRENTWOOD CT CHRIST
TIGARD,OR 97224 9725 SW DURHAM ROAD
TIGARD,OR 97223
2S 111 CA-01800 2S 111 CD-02300
RITCHEY CALVIN J& SPENCER BARBARA A TRUST
MAYDORIS A TRUSTEES 9600 SW SUMMERFIELD DR
15537 SW SUMMERFIELD LN TIGARD,OR 97224
TIGARD,OR 97224
2S 111 CD-02100 2S 111 CD-03000
ROSSMAN DALE V AND STOUT BARBARA L CO-TRUSTEE&
MARJORIE F DOOLING CAROL S CO-TRUSTEE
15581 SW SUMMERFIELD LN 15630 SW 98TH
TIGARD,OR 97224 TIGARD,OR 97224
2S 111 DC-06300 2S 111 CD-03100
SULLIVAN ROBERT D AND TODD MARIAN F
KATHERINE J MAYOR MAURI
9505 SW BRENTWOOD PLACE 9645 SW BRENTWOOD PL
TIGARD,OR 97224 TIGARD,OR 97224
111 CD-01000 2S111 CD-01400
S ERFIELD NO 4 TOPOLSKI CHARLES F
OW F ALL LOTS 15606 SW SUMMERFIELD LN
, TIGARD,OR 97224
2 711CD-011 2S111CD-08900
SU IELD NO 4 TOWLE JANET C
OW, S LL LOTS 15910 SW SERENA CT
�f TIGARD,OR 97224
2 111CA-0130 2S111CD-0360D .
SU E ELD NO 7 ULWELLING JOHN J&KATHLEEN M
OWN OF ALL LOTS PO BOX 230781
, TIGARD,OR 97281
2 111 CD-026 2S111 DC-06500
SU E ELD NO 7 WATKINS PARKER D JR
OWN F ALL LOTS 9480 SW BRENTWOOD PL
TIGARD,OR 97224
S 1 11 DC-152 25111 CD-10300
S ME ELD NO 7 WEGENER BRIAN AND
OWN OF ALL LOTS KAREN BULLARD
9830 SW KIMBERLY
TIGARD,OR 97223
2S 171 CD-05400 2S 111 CD-01900
TAYLOR JAMES B& WILEY RICHARD H&LOIS W TRUSTE
E JUANITA TRUSTEES 15613 SW SUMMERFIELD LN
15945 SW BRENTWOOD CT PORTLAND,OR 97224
TIGARD,OR 97224
2S 111 DC-05200
THIELKE JAMES W&LUANNE D
15691 SW SUMMERFIELD LN
TIGARD,OR 97224
2S 111 CD-00300
TIGARD CHURCH OF GOD
15670 SW 98TH AVENUE
TIGARD,OR 97223
2S 111 CD-02000
TILLMAN JOHN&BONNIE J
15597 SW SUMMERFIELD LN
TIGARD,OR 97224
Jack Biethan Josh Thomas
11023 SW Summerfield Drive, #4 10395 SW Bonanza
Tigard, OR 97224 Tigard, OR 97224
Kristen Miller
8940 SW Edgewood Street
Tigard, OR 97223
Paul Owen
10335 SW Highland Drive
Tigard, OR 97224
Louise Fronville
15760 SW Oak Meadow Lane
Tigard, OR 97224
Tim Esau
PO Box 230695
Tigard, OR 97281
Nathan and Ann Murdock
PO Box 231265
Tigard, OR 97281
Ross Sundberg
16382 SW 104th Avenue
Tigard, OR 97224
Brian Wegener
9830 SW Kimberly Drive
Tigard, OR 97224
J. Dyar
10430 SW Century Oak Drive
Tigard, OR 97224
Rex Caffall
13205 SW Village Glenn
Tigard, OR 97223
CITY OF TIGARD - SOUTH CIT SUBCOMMITfEE (pg. I of I) (i:lcurpinlsetupllabelslClT South.doc) UPDATED: November 27, 2002
CITY Of TIGARD
COMMUNITY DEYELOPMENT DEPARTMENT
PLANNING DIYISION CITYOFTIGARD
I 3125 SW HALL BOULEYARD Community�Devefopment
TIGARD, OREGON 97223 ,SkapingABettesCommunity
PNONE: 503-639-4171 FAX: 503-684-1291 (Attn: Patty/Planning)
° � 0 ° 00 00 ° ° 0 ° 5° 0 ° �[�� �
Property owner information is valid for 3 months from the date of your request
INDICATE ALL PROJECT MAP & TAX LOT NUMBERS (i.e. 1S�34A6, Tax�ot o0100) OR THE
ADDRESSES FOt� ALL PRUJECT PARCELS BELOW:
- �- � C�-(,�
�-r'c -`-x,tJ � �- , `�'� ZZ �S _ �.���
INDICATE WHETHER YOU ARE REQUESTING 1, 2 OR 3 SETS OF LABELS: �
(NOTE: A minimum of 2 sets of labels will be provided (unless only holding a neighborhood meeting at this time) to place on
your 2 sets of envelopes that applicants are required to submit at the time of application submittal. If a neighborhood
meeting is required and you have not yet held that meeting, you can request 3 sets provided your land use application will be
submitted and deemed complete by the Planning Division within 3 months from this request.)
�;-fs��f-3�ica3
NAME OF CONTACT PERSON: <�i�tn �,�.�[.�/�rb se�xl _ PHONE: �t-n�- �`��-�'=�5`�
This request may be mailed, faxed or hand delivered to the City of Tigard. Please allow a
2-day minimum for processing requesfs. Upon compl�etion of y,our request, the contact person will be
called to pick up their request that will be placed in Will Calf by their last name, at the Community
Development Reception Desk. .
The cost of processing your request must be paid at the time of pick up, as exact cost can not be
pre-determined.
PLEASE NOTE: FOR REASONS OF ACCURACY, ONLY ORIGINAL MAILING LABELS PROVIDED
BY THE CITY VS. RE-TYPED MAILING LABELS WILL BE ACCEPTED.
Cost Description:
$11 to generate the mailing list, plus$2 per sheet for printing the list onto labels(20 addresses per sheet).
Then, multi I the cost to rint one set of labels b the number of sets r uested.
EXAMPLE COST FOR THIS REQUEST
4 sheets of labels x$2/sheet= 8.00 x 2 sets= $16.00 �sheet(s)of labels x$2/sheet=�x�sets= ��'
2 sheets of labels x$2lsheet for CIT area x 2 sets=$ 4.00 �sheet(s)of labels x$2lsheet for CIT area=�x�sets=�
GENERATE LIST =$11•Oq ���tv GENERA TOTAL
TOTAL =$31.00 � ,� ,3
.�.
AFFIDAVIT OF MAILING CRYOFTIGARD
�'onununity<UrveCopraent
SfiapingA BetterCommunity
I, �Patricia L. Lunsford, being first duly sworn/affirm, on oath depose and say that I am a SeniorAclministrative SpeciaCut for
the City of T:garcf`Washington County, Oregon and that I served the foilowing:
{Check Appropnate Box(s)Below}
❑x HOTICE OF FINAL ORDER FOR:� CUP2003-00005/TIGARD CHURCH Of GOD EXPANSION
� AMENDED NOTICE (File No./Name Reference)
HEARING BODY: HEARING DATE:
❑ City of Tigard Planning Director
� Tigard Hearings Officer (July 28, 2003)
❑ Tigard Planning Commission
❑ Tigard City Council
A copy of the said notice being hereto attached, marked Ellhlblt"A", and by reference made a part hereof, was mailed to
each named person(s) at the address(s} shown on the attached list(s), marked Exhlblt"B",and by reference made a part
hereof, on A119�S[12,2003, and deposited in the United States Mail on A119�St12,2003, postage prepaid.
� . ��
(Person t Prepa otic )
,�;�17E O�'O�GON �
Coun�j►of'WasTington )ss.
CY�y of�tigard )
Subscribed and sworn/affirmed before me on the �� day of " Z2 ^ , 2003.
�
}� OFFICIAL SEAL
``b J BENGTSON
NOTARY PUBLIC•OREGON
COMMISSION NO.368086
MY COMMISSION�XPIRES APR.27,2007 �
��� ��
My Commission Expires: 7 �� ��
EXHIr�IT�� ���
I 20 DAYS = I 0/4/2003 CITY OF TIGARD
DATE OF FILING: 8/I I/2003 Coramunity�ve�eCopment
Shaping��detterCornmunity
CITY OF TIGARD
`Washiragton County, Oregora
NOTICE OF FINAL ORDER BY THE HEARINGS OFFICER
Case Numbers: CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT CUP 2003-00005
Case Name: TIGARD CHURCH OF GOD EXPANSION
Name of Owner: Ti ard Church of God Attn: Bruce Plunkett
Name of Applicant: Zaik/Miller Associates Attn: Jackie Root
Address of Applicant: 2340 NW Thurman Street Suite 201 Portland Ore on 97210
Address of Property: 15670 SW 98 Avenue Ti ard Ore on 97224
Tax Ma /Lot Nos.: Washin ton Co. Tax Assessor's Ma No. 2S111CD, Tax Lot 300.
A fINAI ORDER INCORPORATING THE FACfS, FINDINGS AND CONflUSIONS APPROVING A REQUEST FOR fONDITIONAI USE. THE CITY OF TIGARD HEARINGS
OFFICER HAS REVIEWED THE APPII(ANTS PLANS, NARRATIVE, MATERIALS, COMMENTS Of REVIEWING AGENfIES, THE PLANNING DIVISION'S STAff REPORT AND
RECOMMENDATIONS FOR THE APPLIfATION DESCRIBED IN FURTHER DETAIL IN THE STAFf REPORT. THE HEARINGS OFFICER HELD A PUBLIL HEARING ON
JULY 28, 2003 TO RECEIVE TESTIMONY REGARDING THIS APPLI(ATION. THIS DEfISION HAS BEEN BASED ON THE FACTS, FINDINGS AND CONClUSIONS
CONTAINED WITHIN THIS fINAL ORDER.
Request: ➢ The applicant is seeking Conditional Use approval to expand the existing facility by 2,875 square
feet for administrative offices and classrooms, and make site modifications to the parking and
landscaped areas. At the close of the record, the Hearings Officer conditionally approved
all applications subject to the conditions of approval within this final order.
Zone: R-7: Medium-Density Residential District. Applicable Review Criteria: Community
Development Code Chapters: 18.330, 18.370, 18.390, 18.510, 18.705, 18.725, 18.745, 18.755,
18.765, 18.780, 18.790, 18.795 and 18.810.
Action: ➢ ❑ Approval as Requested � Approval with Conditions ❑ Denial
Notice: Notice was published in the newspaper and mailed to:
0 Owners of Record Within the Required Distance O Affected Government Agencies
� Area Citizen Involvement Team 0 The Applicants and Owners
The adopted findings of fact and decision can be obtained from the Planning Division/Community
Development Department at the City of Tigard City Hall.
Final Decision:
THIS DECISION IS FINAL ON AUGUST 12, 2003 AND BECOMES
EFFECTIVE ON AUGUST 27, 2003 UNLESS AN APPEAL IS FILED.
Appeal:
The decision of the Review Authority is final for purposes of appeal on the date that it is mailed. Any party with
standing as provided in Section 18.390.040.G.1. may appeal this decision in accordance with Section
18.390.040.G.2. of the Tigard Community Development Code which provides that a written appeal together with
the required fee shall be filed with the Director within ten (10) business days of the date the notice of the
decision was mailed. The appeal fee schedule and forms are available from the Planning Division of Tigard
City Hall, 13125 SW Hall Boulevard, Tigard, Oregon 97223.
THE DEADLINE FOR FILING AN APPEAL IS 5:00 PM ON AUGUST 26, 2003.
Questions: If you have any questions, please call the City of Tigard Planning Division at (503) 639-4171.
BEFORE THE LAND USE HEARINGS OFFICER
FOR THE CITY OF TIGARD,OREGON
Regarding an application by Tigard Church of God for a ) F I N A L O R D E R
conditional use permit for a 2,875-square foot office/classroom )
building as an expansion of the existing church at 15670 ) CUP 2003-00005
SW 98th Avenue in the R-7 zone in the City of Tigard, Oregon ) (Tigard Church of God)
A. SUMMARY
1. Bruce Plunkett filed the application for Tigard Church of God (the "applicant").
He requests approval of a conditional use permit to construct a 2,875-square foot building
for administrative offices and classrooms as an addition to the existing Tigard Church of
God at 15670 SW 98th Avenue; also known as tax lot 300, WCTM 2S111CD (the "site").
The Staff Report to the Hearings Officer dated August 5, 2003 (the "Staff Report")
contains a history of City review and development on the site, which the hearings officer
incorporates as his own.
2. Tigard Hearings Officer Larry Epstein (the "hearings officer") conducted a
duly noticed public hearing to receive testimony and evidence in the matter. At the public
hearing,City staff recommended conditional approval of the application. The applicant
accepted the recommended conditions with ceRain exceptions. Other than service providers,
no one else testified orally or in writing. The hearings officer closed the public record at the
end of the hearing. Disputed issues in this case include:
a. Whether the applicant is required to provide a loading space on the site;
b. Whether the applicant is required to provide additional bicycle parking;
c. Whether the applicant is required to modify the existing church building
to comply with certain building and/or fire standards not directly related to the proposed
expansion; and
d. Whether the applicant is required to obtain an NPDES permit.
3. The hearings officer concludes that the applicant sustained the burden of proof
for a conditional use permit,based on the findings and conclusions included and
incorporated herein and subject to conditions at the end of this final order.
B. HEARING AND RECOI2D
1. The hearings officer received testimony at the public hearing about this
application on July 28, 2003. All exhibits and records of testimony are filed with the Tigard
Department of Community Development. At the beginning of the hearing,the hearings
officer made the declaration required by ORS 197.763. The hearings officer disclaimed
any ex parte contacts, bias or conflicts of interest. The following is a summary by the
hearings officer of selected testimony offered at the public hearing in this matter.
2. City planner Brad Kilby summarized the Staff Report and recommended
approval of the application subject to the conditions provided therein.
a. He noted that the applicant did not submit a lighting plan. He requested
the hearings officer add a condition of approval requiring the applicant to submit a lighting
plan demonstrating compliance with City standards prior to issuance of building permils for
the proposed addition.
b. He noted that the Code requires the applicant to provide a loading space
on the site,because the church building complex will exceed a certain size, and the
requirement cannot be waived. However the City is flexible about the location and design of
the loading space. The applicant can identify an area of the parking lot as the proposed
loading space.
c. He noted that the Code requires the applicant to provide 8 bicycle parking
spaces. However the applicant can request approval of a Type II adjustment to reduce the
number of bicycle parking spaces based on the characteristics of the use.
d. He agreed with Ms. Root that the applicant is not required to obtain an
NPDES permit, because the site is smaller than 5 acres.
3. Jackie Root and Edward Whitehead testified for the applicant.
a. Ms. Root accepted the Staff Report and recommended conditions with
certain exceptions.
i. She argued that a loading space is unnecessary. The church does
not distribute or receive goods by truck.
ii. She requested the hearings officer reduce the bicycle parking
requirement from 8 spaces to 5 spaces. The 5 existing bicycle parking spaces on the site
are more than adequate to serve the church. She was not aware of any church members
arriving at the site by bicycle.
iii. She argued that the applicant should not be required to modify
the existing church building to accommodate the expansion, based on her discussions with
the City building official and the fire marshal at the pre-application conference. She
submitted her notes from that meeting.
iv. She argued that the applicant is not required to obtain an NPDES
permit, because the site is smaller than 5 acres.
v. She waived the applicant's right to have the record held open to
offer a closing written argument.
b. Mr. Whitehead testified that he has been a member of the church for 25
years, and the church has never needed a loading space during that time.
4. At the end of the hearing, the hearings officer closed the public record and
announced his intention to approve the application subject to recommended conditions with
certain amendments.
C. DISCUSSION
1. The Staff Report identifies the applicable approval standards for the application
and applies them to the record in the case. The hearings officer agrees that the standards
identified in the Staff Report are all of the applicable standards and finds that they are
correctly applied to the facts of the case in the Staff Report. Substantial evidence in the
record shows that the proposed use does or can comply with the applicable approval criteria
CUP 2003-00005 Hearings O�cer Final Order
(Tigard Church of God) page Z
for a CUP, and adoption of recommended conditions of approval as amended will ensure
final plans are submitted and implemented as approved consistent with those criteria and
standards and will prevent, reduce or mitigate potential adverse impacts of the development
consistent with the requirements of the Tigard Development Code (the "TDC"). The
hearings officer adopts the findings in the Staff Report as his own,except to the extent
inconsistent with the findings and conclusions in this final order.
2. The hearings officer finds that the applicant is not required to provide a loading
space on the site. TDC 18.765.080.A provides that off-street loading spaces are required
for"commercial, industrial and institutional buildings or structures to be built or altered
which receive and distribute rnaterial or merchandise by truck..." (Emphasis added). The
church does not receive or distribute material or merchandise by truck,based on the
testimony of Ms. Root and Mr. Whitehead. There is no substantial evidence to the
contrary. Therefore condition of approval 1 should be deleted.
3. TDC Table 18.7652 requires that the applicant provide 1 bicycle parking space
for every 20 seats in the main assembly area of the church. The applicant's existing
sanctuary provides 160 seats. Therefore the applicant is required to provide 8 bicycle
parking spaces on the site.� TDC 18.765.OSO.E authorizes the director to reduce the number
of required bicycle parking spaces through a Type II adjustment. The applicant should be
allowed to request such an adjustment without a modification to this conditional use permit.
Condition of approval 8 should be modified to that effect.
4. City Building Division staff commented that the applicant will need to add one-
hour fire walls and make certain other modifications to the existing church to accommodate
the proposed administration building. See page 20, Section VIII of the Staff Report. These
comments appear to conflict with Ms. Root's notes from the May 22, 2003 building permit
pre-application meeting. Based on Ms. Root's notes, City officials agreed to waive
structural modifications to the existing church if the applicant provided fire sprinklers.
However the hearings officer cannot resolve the conflict through this decision. The
hearings officer has no authority to implement or interpret the building and fire codes. That
authority rests solely with the City building official and the fire marshal,respectively.
5. The hearings officer finds that an NPDES permit is not required for this
development, because the site is smaller than 5 acres. The finding that an NPDES pernut is
required on page 19 of the Staff Report is incorrect.
6. TDC 18.360.090.A(10)provides that "[e]xterior lighting levels shall be selected
and the angles shall be oriented towards areas vulnerable to crime." The analysis in the
Staff Report concluded the application complies with this section because the Police
Department did not object to the plan, but the hearings officer finds that is not responsive to
the standard. The hearings officer further finds that it is feasible for the applicant to comply
with this standard by submitting a lighting plan for review and approval consistent with
TDC 18.360.090.A(10). Therefore the hearings officer concludes a condition of approval
is warranted requiring the applicant to submit to the planning staff for review and approval a
lighting plan showing that light fixtures are selected,designed and situated to direct light
towards areas of the site vulnerable to crime and away from abutting properties.
� 160/20=8 bicycle parking spaces
CUP 2003-00005 Hearings D�cer Final Order
(Tigard Church of God) page 3
D. CONCLUSIONS
Based on the findings and discussion provided or incorporated in this final order,
the hearings officer concludes that the applicant sustained the burden of proof that the
proposed conditional use pernut does or will comply with the applicable criteria of the
Community Development Code, provided development that occurs after this decision
complies with applicable local, state, and federal laws and with conditions of approval
warranted to ensure such compliance occurs in fact.
E. DECISION
In recognition of the findings and conclusions contained herein, and incorporating
the Staff Report and public testimony and exhibits received in this matter,the hearings
officer hereby approves CUP 2003-00005 (Tigard Church of God), subject to the following
conditions of approval:
THE FOLLOWING CONDITIONS SHALL BE SATISFIED
. PRIOR TO ISSUANCE OF THE SITE AND/OR BUILDING PERMITS: ` � ;.
Submit to the Planning Department (Brad Kilby, 639-4171, ext. 2434) for
review and approval:
1. The applicant shall comply with the tree protection measures prescribed by
the consulting arborist.
2. The applicant shall provide the city arborist with a construction sequence
including installation and removal of tree protection devices,clearing,
grading, and paving.
3. The applicant shall notify the city arborist when tree protection measures are
in place so that he may venfy that the measures will function properly prior
to construction.
4. The applicant shall submit a revised site plan that shows:
a. The manner in which crossings of the traffic aisles will be identi�ed
in compliance with TDC Section 18.705.030(F)(3).
b. Provisions for a six-foot wall around the trash enclosure.
c. All access aisles, parking spaces, and direction of flow are clearly
identified and marked as part of the parking lot striping.
d. Eight(8)bicycle-parking spaces designed and constructed to the
standards that are identified in TDC Section 18.765.050 or approval
of(or pending application for) a Type II adjustment reducing the
number of required bicycle parking spaces.
5. A lighting plan showing that light fixtures are selected, designed and situated
to direct light towards areas of the site vulnerable to crime and away from the
abutting properties. Light fixtures shall be provided in areas having heavy
pedestrian or vehicular traffic and in potentially dangerous areas such as
parking lots, stairs,ramps and abrupt grade changes. Fixtures shall be
placed at a height so that light patterns overlap at a height of seven feet,
which is sufficient to illuminate a person.
CUP 2003-00005 Hearings O�cer Final Order
(Tigard Church af God) Page 4
Submit to the Engineering Department (Kim McMillan, 639-4171, ext. 2642) for
review and approval:
6. A Public Facility Improvement(PFI)permit is required for this project to
cover the street trees and any other work in the public ri�ht-of-way. Six (6)
sets of detailed public improvement plans shall be submitted for review to
the Engineering Department. NOTE: these plans are in addition to any
drawings required by the Building Division and should on�include sheets
relevant to public improvements. Public Facility Improvement(PFI)permit
plans shall conform to City of Tigard Public Improvement Design
Standards, which are available at C�ty Hall and the City's web page
(www.ci.tigard.or.us).
7. The PFIpernut plan submittal shall include the exact le�al name, address
and telephone number of the individual or corporate entity who will be
designated as the "Permittee", and who will provide the financial assurance
for the public improvements. For example, specify if the entity is a
cor�oration,limited partnership,LLC,etc. Also specify the state within
which the entity is incorporated and provide the name of the corporate
contact person. Failure to provide accurate information to the Engineering
Department will delay processing of project documents.
8. The applicant'�construction plans shall show planting of street trees on the
east side of 98 Avenue.
9. The applicant shall provide connection of proposed addition to the public
sanitary sewerage system. A connection permit is required to connect to the
existing public sanitary sewer system.
10. The applicant shall provide an on-site water quality facility as required by
Clean Water Services Design and Construction Standards (adopted by
Resolution and Order No.00-7). Final plans and calculations shall be
submitted to the Engineering Department(Kim McMillan)for review and
approval prior to issuance of the site pernut. In addition, a proposed
maintenance plan shall be submitted along with the plans and calculations
for review and approval.
11. An erosion control plan shall be provided as part of the Public Facility
Improvement(PFI)pernut drawings. The plan shall conform to the
"Erosion Prevention and Sediment Control Design and Planning Manual,
December 2000 edition."
,`„�,,.�."a,. TIIE FOLLOWING CONDITIONS SHALL BE SATISFIED '• y� -
� '� PRIOR TO A FINAL BUILDING INSPECTION:
Submit to the Lngineering Department (Kim McMilian, 639-4171, ext. 2642) for
review and approval:
12. Prior to a final building inspection, the applicant shall complete any work in
the�ublic right-of-way (or public easement)and obtain approval from the
Eng�neering Department.
13. The applicant shall either place the existing overhead utility lines along SW
98�'Avenue underground as a part of this project, or they shall pay the fee
in-lieu of undergrounding. The fee shall be calculated by the frontage of the
site that is�arallel to the utility lines and will be$27.50 per lineal foot. If
the fee option is chosen, the amount will be$10,862.00 and it shall be paid
prior to a final building inspection.
CUP 2003-D0005 Flearings O�cer Final Order
(Tigard Church ojGod) Page S
14. Prior to final building inspection, the applicant shall pay the fee in-lieu of
constructing an on-site water quantity facility. The fee is based on the total
area of new impervious surfaces in the proposed development.
15. To ensure compliance with Clean Water Services design and construction
standards,the a�plicant shall employ the design engineer responsible for the
design and specifications of the�rivate water quality facility to perform
construction and visual observation of the water quality facility for
compliance with the design and specifications. These inspecttons shall be
made at si�nificant stages, and at completion of the construction. Prior to
final buildmg mspection,the design engineer shall provide the City of Tigard
(Inspection Supervisor)with written confirmation that the water quality
facility is in compliance with the design and specifications. Staff Contact:
Hap Watkins, Building Division.
FAILURE TO SATISFY THE CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL WITHIN 18
MONTHS OF THE EFFECTIV�DATE OF TIIE I�EARINGS OFP'ICLR'S
D�CISION SHALL RENDER THE �IEARINGS�OFFICER'S DECISION VOID.
DATED this l lth day of August, 2003.
Larry Epstein, ., CP
City of Tigard Land Use Hearings Officer
CUP 2003-00005 Hearings O�cer Final Order
(Tigard Church of God) Page 6
Agenda Item: 2.1
Hearin Date: Jul 28 2003
STAFF REPORT TO THE
HEARINGS OFFICER CITYOFiiGARD
Community�DeveCopment
FOR THE CITY �F TIGARD, OREGON S(rapingABetterCommunity
120 DAYS = 10/4/2003
SECTION I. APPLICATION SUMMARY
FILE NAME: TIGARD CHURCH OF GOD EXPANSION
CASE NO: Conditional Use Permit (CUP) CUP2003-00005
OWNER: Tigard Church of God
Attn: Bruce Plunkett
15670 SW 98�' Avenue
Tigard, OR 97224
APPLICANT: Zaik/Miller Associates
Attn: Jackie Root
2340 NW Thurman Street, Suite 201
Portland, OR 97210
PROPOSAL: The applicant is seeking Conditional Use Approval to expand the facility
by 2,875 square feet for administrative offices and classrooms, and make
site modifications to the parking and landscaped areas.
LOCATION: 15670 SW 98�' Avenue; WCTM 2S111CD, Tax Lot 300.
COMPREHENSIVE
PLAN and
ZONING
DESIGNATION: Medium-Density Residential; R-7: Religious Institutions and other civic
uses are permitted conditionally in the R-7 zoning district.
APPLICABLE
REVIEW
CRITERIA: Community Development Code Chapters 18.330, 18.360, 18.390, 18.510,
18.705, 18.725, 18.745, 18.755, 18.765, 18.780, 18.790, 18.795 and
18.810.
SECTION II. STAFF RECOMMENDATION
Staff recommends that the Hearings Officer find that the proposed Conditional Use Permit will
not adversely affect the health, safety and welfare of the City and meets the Approval
Standards as outlined in this report. Therefore, Staff recommends APPROVAL, subject to the
following recommended Conditions of Approval:
TIGARD CHURCH OF GOD EXPANSION PAGE 1 OF 21 CUP2003-00005
7/28/2003 PUBLIC HEARING STAFF REPORT TO THE HEARINGS OFFICER
CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL
THE FOLLOWING CONDITIONS SHALL BE SATISFIED
PRIOR TO ISSUANCE OF THE SITE ANDIOR BUILDING PERMITS:
u mit to t e anning epartment ra i y, , ext. or review an
approval:
1. Prior to site work, the applicant shall revise the parking plan to include one (1)
off-street loading space: Said space shall be designed and constructed to meet the
dimensional critena in Tigard Development Code (TDC) Section 18.765.080(B).
2. The applicant shall comply with the tree protection measures prescribed by the
consulting arborist.
3. The applicant shall provide the .city arborist with a construction sequence.including
installation and removal of tree protection devices, clearing, grading, and paving.
4. The applicant shall notify the city arborist when tree protection measures are in place
so that he may verify that the measures will function properly prior to construction.
5. The ap�p,licant shall revise the site plan to indicate the manner in which crossin s of
the traffic aisles will be identified in compliance with TDC Section 18.705.030(F)(3�.
6. Prior to the issuance of building permits, the applicant shall revise the plans to include
provisions for a six-foot wall around the trash enclosure.
7. Prior to the issuance of building permits, the applicant sha�l submit a revised site plan
that shows that all access aisles, parking spaces, and direction of flow are clearly
identified and marked as part of the parking lot striping.
8. Prior to the issuance of building permits, the applicant shall revise the parking plan to
accommodate 8 bicycle-parking spaces. Said spaces must be designed and
constructed to the standards that are identified in TDC Section 18.765.050.
Submit to the Engineering Department (Kim McMillan, 639-4171, ext. 2642) for review
and approval:
9. A Public Facility Improvement (PFI) permit is required for this project to cover the street
trees and any other work m the public nght-of-way. Six (6 sets of detailed public
improvement plans sha(I be submitted for review to the �ngineering Department.
NOTE: these plans are in addition to any drawings required by the Buildm Division and
should only include sheets relevanf to public improvements. �ublic Facility
Improvement (PFI) permit plans shall conform to City of Tigard Public Improvement
Design Standards, which are available at City Hall and the City's web page
(www.ci.tiqard.or.us).
10. The PFI permit plan submittal shall include the exact legal name, address and telephone
number of the individual or corporate entity w�will be designated as the "Permittee",
and who will provide the financial assurance for the public improvements. For example,
specify if the entity is a corporation, limited partnership, LLC, etc. Also specify the state
within which the entity is.incorporated and provide the name of the corporate contact
person. Failure to provide accurate mformation to the Engineering Department will
delay processing of project documents.
11. Th� applicanYs construction plans shall show planting of street trees on the east side of
98 Avenue.
12. The applicant shall provide connection of proposed addition to the public sanitary
sewerage system. A connection permit is required to connect to the existing public
sanitary sewer system.
TIGARD CHURCH OF GOD EXPANSION PAGE 2 OF 21 CUP2003-00005
7/28/2003 PUBLIC HEARING STAFF REPORT TO THE HEARINGS OFFICER
13. The applicant shall provide an on-site water uality facility as required by Clean Water
Services Design and Construction Standards�adopted by Resolution and Order No. 00-
7). Final plans and calculations shall be submitted to the Engineering Department (Kim
McMillan) for review and approval prior to issuance of the site permit. In addition, a
proposed maintenance plan shall be submitted along with the plans and calculations for
review and approval.
14. An erosion control plan shall be provided as part of the Public Facility Improvement
�PFI) permit drawings. The plan shall conform to the "Erosion Prevention and Sediment
on4rol Design and Planning Manual, December 2000 edition."
THE FOLLOWING CONDITIONS SHALL BE SATISFIED
PRIOR TO A FINAL BUILDING INSPECTION:
u mit to t e ng�neering epartment im c i an, 7 , ext. or review
and approval:
15. Prior to a final building inspection, the applicant shall complete any work in the public
right-of-way (or public easement) and obtain approval from the Engineering Department.
16. The applicant shall either place the existing overhead utility lines along SW 98th Avenue
underground as a part of this project, or they shall pay the fee in-lieu of undergrounding.
The fee shall be calculated by the frontage of the site that is parallel to the utility lines
and will be $27.50 per lineal foot. If the fee option is chosen, the amount wi{I be
$10,862.00 and it shall be paid prior to a final building inspection
17. Prior to final buildin� inspection, the applicant shall pay the fee in-lieu of constructing an
on-site water quantity facility. The fee is based on the total area of new impervious
surfaces in the proposed development.
18. To ensure compliance with Clean Water Services design and construction standards,
the applicant shall employ the design engineer responsible for the design and
specifications of the private water quality facility to perform construction and visual
observation of the water quality facility for compliance with the design and
specifications. These inspections shall be made at significant stages, and at
completion of the construction. Prior to final building inspection, the design engineer
shall provide the City of Tigard (Inspection Supervisor) with written confirmation that
the water quality facility is in compliance with the design and specifications. Staff
Contact: Hap Watkins, Building Division.
FAILURE TO SATISFY THE CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL WITHIN 18 MONTHS
�F THE EFFECTIVE DATE OF THE HEARINGS OFFICER'S DECISION
SHALL RENDER THE HEARINGS OFFICER'S DECISION VOID.
SECTION III. BACKGROUND INFORMATION
Site Historv:
The site was rezoned in 1975 for the Church of Christ, and subsequent approval of
SDR18-76 permitted the construction of the facility. The Tigard Church of God received
conditional use approval in 1977 under CU14-77 and SDR 34 77 to expand the facility. The
Church received approval in 1980 under CU20-80 to utilize a single-family residence on site
to hold bible study.
Vicinity Information:
The site is surrounded by property zoned for and developed with a mixture of residential
densities. The Southwest Church of Christ is directly south of this site.
TIGARD CHURCH OF GOD EXPANSION PAGE 3 OF 21 CUP2003-00005
7/28/2003 PUBLIC HEARING STAFF REPORT TO THE HEARINGS OFFICER
Site Information and Pro osal Descri tion:
e site is current y eve ope wit t e existing church. The cur�ent proposal involves a
2,875 square foot expansion for classrooms and administrative offices. The applicant is not
proposing to modify the existing sanctuary.
SECTION IV. DECISION MAKING PROCEDURES, PERMITS AND USE
Use Classification: Section 18.130.020
is s e se a egories.
The applicant is proposing to amend the existing conditional use permit to allow for expansion
of an existing church by 2,875 square feet. Churches are permitted by Conditional Use in all
zones. Conditional Use applications are subject to a public hearing before the City of Tigard
Hearings Officer.
Summa Land Use Permits: Chapter 18.310
e ines e ecision-ma ing type to which the land-use application is assigned.
The proposed amendment to the existing Conditional Use permit is a Type III-HO decision.
SECTION V. NEIGHBORHOOD COMMENTS
The Tigard Community DeveloPment Code requires that property owners within 500
feet of the subject site be notified of the proposal, and be given an opportunity for
written comments and/or oral testimony prior to a decision being made. In addition,
the applicant is required to post the site w�th notice of the public hearing.
Notice of the application was mailed and staff has verified that the site was posted. To date,
staff has not received any letters in support or against the proposal.
SECTION VI. SUMMARY OF APPLICABLE CRITERIA
A summar� of the applicable criteria in this case, in the Chapter order in which they are
addressed in this repo�E are as follows:
A. S ecific Conditional Use Criteria
enera pprova ri eria
Additional Conditions of A proval)
B. licable Develo mentPCode Standards
on i iona ses
18.360 Site Development Review)
18.510 Residential Zoning)
18.705 Access, Egress & Circulation)
18.725 Environmental Performance Standards)
18.745 Landscaping and Screening)
18.755 Mixed Solid Waste & Recycfable Storage)
18.765 Off-Street Parking and Loading Requirements)
18.780 signs)
18.790 Tree FZemoval)
18.795 isual Clearance)
C. Additional Site Develo ment Review A roval Standards
D. ree an i i m rovemen an ar s
E. m ac u
TIGARD CHURCH OF GOD EXPANSION PAGE 4 OF 21 CUP2003-00005
7/28J2003 PUBLIC HEARING STAFF REPORT TO THE HEARINGS OFFICER
SECTION VII. APPLICABLE REVIEW CRITERIA AND FINDINGS
A. SPECIFIC CONDITIONAL USE APPROVAL CRITERIA
Section 18.330.010.A states that the purpose of this chapter is to Provide standards
and procedures under which a conditional use may be permitted, enlarged or altered if
the site is appropriate and if other appropriate conditions of approval can be met.
There are cerEain uses which due to the nature of the impacts on surrounding land
uses and public facilities require a case-by-case review and analysis.
Section 18.330.020.A states that a request for approval for a new conditional use shall
be processed as a Type III-HO procedure, as reyulated by Chapter 18.390.050, using
approval criteria contained in Section 18.330.030A and subject to other requirements
in Chapter 18.330.
General A roval Criteria for a Conditional Use: Section 18.330.030:
e si e size an imensions provi e a equa e area or e nee s of the proposed use;
According to the Washington County Assessor's Office, the existing site size is 2.77 acres.
This report evaluates the proposal and necessary applicable code requirements, and as
conditioned, the site size is adequate for the needs of the proposed 2,875 square foot
expansion.
The characteristics of the site are suitable for the proposed use considering size, shape,
location, topography, and natural features;
There are no apparent natural features on this site, and the size, shape, and location are not
extraordinary. As discussed in this report, the site appears suifable for the proposed
development.
All required public facilities have adequate capacity to serve the proposal; and
The site is already served by all required public facilities. According to the comments received,
all public facilities have adequate capacity to serve the site.
The applicable requirements of the zoning district are met except as modified by this
chapter.
The following table provides the dimensional standards in the R-7 zone, the additional
dimensional requirements for religious facilities are specified in the Conditional Use Standards
of Section 18.330.050.B.9 and the dimensions proposed for this development.
STANDARD R-7 CONDITIONAL USE PROPOSED
REQUIREMENT
Minimum Lot Size 5,000 sq.ft. 20,000 sq.ft 120,74d sq.ft
Minimum Lot Width 50 ft. — 395.6ft
Minimum Setbacks
Front yard 15 ft 25 ft 74 ft
Side facing street on corner&through lots 10 ft 20 ft N/A
Side yard 5 ft 20 ft 144/51 ft
Rear yard 15 ft 20 ft 85 ft
Maximum Height 35 ft. Varies 22ft.
Maximum Site Coverage[2) 80% — 67•/.[2]
Minimum Landscape Requirement 20°k — 33•/.
�2] InGudes all buildings and impervious surfaces.
As identified in the table above, the applicant's plans show that the dimensional standards for
the base zone and Conditional Use sfandards are met.
TIGARD CHURCH OF GOD EXPANSION PAGE 5 OF 21 CUP2003-00005
7/28/2003 PUBLIC HEARING STAFF REPORT TO THE HEARINGS OFFICER
The su�plementary requirements set forth in other chapters of this Code including but
not limited to Chapter 18.780, Signs, and Chapter 18.360, Site Development Review, if
applicable, are met or can be conditioned to be satisfied.
The applicable review criteria in this case include the following chapters of the Community
Development Code: 18.330, Conditional Use; 18.360, Site Development Review; 18.390,
Decision Making Procedures; 18.510, Residential Zoning Districts; 18.705, Access, Egress and
Circulation; 18.725, Environmental Performance Sfandards; 18.745, Landscaping and
Screening; 18.755, Mixed Solid Waste and Recyclables Storage; 18.765, Off-Street Parkmg;
18.780, Signs; 18.790, Tree Removal; 18.795, Visual Clearance Areas; and 18.810, Street and
Utility Improvement Standards. The development standards and requirements of these
chapters are addressed further in this report.
The proposal contains no elements related to the provisions of the following chapters:
Variances and Adjustments; 18.390, 18.600, Community Plan Area Standards; 18.710,
Accessory Residential Units; 18.715, Density Computations; 18.720, Design Compatibility
Standards; 18.730, Exceptions to Development Standard; 18.740, Historic Overlay; 18.742,
Home Occupations; 18.750, Manufactured/Mobile Home Regulations; 18.760, Nonconforming
Situations; 18.775, Sensitive Lands; 18.785, Temporary Uses; and 18.798, Wireless
Communications Facilities. These chapters are, therefore, found to be inapplicable as
approval standards.
The use will comply with the applicable policies of the Comprehensive Plan.
The Comprehensive Plan is implemented by the Community Development Code. Compliance
with Comprehensive Plan policies are, therefore, assured by satisfaction of the applicable
development standards of the development code as addressed within this report.
FINDING: Based on the analysis above, the General Approval Criteria for a Conditional Use
have been satisfied.
Additional Conditions of A roval for Conditional Use.
ec ion . . s a es a e earings u ori y may impose conditions on the
approval of a conditional use, which are found necessary to ensure the use is
compatible with other uses in the vicinity, and that the impact of the proposed use on
the surrounding uses and public facilities is minimized. These conditions may
include, but are not limited to the following:
Limiting the hours, days, place andlor manner of operation;
The majority of activities for the Church occur on weekends and evenings. A search of the
city's code enforcement records shows no complaints against the existing church operations.
Staff finds no reason or circumstance to impose condi�ions limiting the hours, days, and/or
manner of operation.
Requiring desiyn features, which minimize environmental impacts such as noise,
vibration, air pollution, glare, odor and/or dust;
The hazards related to odor, dust, noise, glare, air pollution, and vibration can be mitigated
through the design of the building and the buffering and landscaping of the use that has been
proposed as conditions of approval. Those hazards that are inherent dunng construction will
be held to the same standards as other construction within the City of Ti ard as regulated by
the Tigard Municipal Code (TMC). All of these items will be sub�ec� to local and state
enforcement review if the applicant exceeds the allowed levels.
Requiring additional setback areas, lot area, and/or lot depth or width;
The buffer requirements are discussed further in this report.
Limiting the building height, size or lot coverage, and/or location on the site;
TIGARD CHURCH OF GOD EXPANSION PAGE 6 OF 21 CUP2003-00005
7/28/2003 PUBLIC HEARING STAFF REPORT TO THE HEARINGS OFFICER
Based on the plans submitted, the applicant has designed and placed the building such that
it meets the underlying zone requirements, as well as, the additional requiremenfs imposed
on conditional uses.
Designating the size, number, location and/or design of vehicle access points;
The applicant is proposing to utilize the two existing accesses off of SW 98th Avenue. There
are no new accesses proposed or required for this addition.
Requiring street right-of-way to be dedicated and street(s) to be improved;
Although there are no required street dedications, the applicant will be required to plant street
trees along the frontage to complete the street improvements. Street trees specifics have
been addressed later in this report.
Requiring landscaping, screening, drainage and/or surfacing of parking and loading
areas;
The applicant has proposed to restripe the parking lot and add some new trees and
vegetation to screen the parking area and blend the new building with the existing church.
These items are discussed in more detail later in this discussion.
Limiting the number, size, location, height and/or lighting of signs;
There are no new signs proposed with this expansion.
Limiting or setting standards for the location and/or intensity of outdoor lighting;
Lighting is addressed later in this report.
Re4uiring berms, screening or landscaping and the establishment of standards for
their installation and maintenance;
There is no evidence in the record to suggest that this particular proposal would trigger a
need for any additional berming, screer�ng and or landscaping. The facility is already
partially screened by a berm alo.ng SW 98t Avenue. This criterion is met.
Requiring and designating the size, height, location and/or materials for fences;
The applicant has not proposed any new fencing, and there is no requirement to provide
additional fencing for this project. This cntenon is satisfied.
Requiring the protection and preservation of existing trees, soils, vegetation,
watercourses, habitat areas andlor drainage areas;
The applicant has provided a tree preservation plan that will be discussed further in this
report. There are no watercourses, habitat areas, drainage areas, or vegetation other than
domesticated that will be affected by this proposal.
Requiring the dedication of su�cient open land area for a greenway adjoining and
with�n the floodplain when land form alterations and development are allowed within
the 100-year floodplain; and
This development is not adjacent to the 100-year floodplain; therefore, a condition is not
necessary.
Requiring the construction of a pedestrian/bicycle pathway within the floodplain in
accordance with the adopted pedestrianlbicycle pathway plan.
This development is not adjacent to the 100-year floodplain, therefore, a condition is not
necessary.
TIGARD CHURCH OF GOD EXPANSION PAGE 7 OF 21 CUP2003-00005
7/28/2003 PUBLIC HEARING STAFF REPORT TO THE HEARINGS OFFICER
B. APPLICABLE DEVELOPMENT CODE STANDARDS
Site Develo ment Review—Cha ter 18.360:
e i e eve opmen eview approva s andards require that a development proposal be
found to be consistent with the various standards of the Community Development Code. The
proposal's consistency with these Code Chapters is reviewed in the following sections.
Residential Zonin Districts — Cha ter 18.510:
e resi en ia zoning is nc eve oPmen s andards are discussed previously in this report
under the Conditional Use standards. It should be noted that Religious Institutions are
permitted conditionally in all residential zones.
Access E ress and Circulation - Cha ter 18.705:
ec ion . . . . s a es a an access report shall be submitted with all new
development proposals which verifies design of driveways and streets are safe by
meeting adeyuate stacking needs, sight distance and deceleration standards as set by
ODOT, Washington County, the City and AASHTO.
The proposed addition to this facility is to provide office space for current staff members.
The applicant has indicated that the addition wi�l not generate new trips to the church site.
There are two existing driveways that access 98 Avenue and the applicant is not proposing
any changes to these driveways.
Section 18.705.030.H.2 states that driveways shall not be permitted to be placed in the
influence area of collector or arterial street intersections. Influence area of
intersections is that area where queues of traffic commonly form on approach to an
intersection. The minimum driveway setback from a collector or arterial street
intersection shall be150 feet, measured from the right-of-way line of the intersecting
street to the throat of the proposed driveway. The setback may,be greater dependin
upon the influence area, as determined from City Engineer review of a traffic impac�
report submitted by the ap plicant's traffic engineer. In a case where a roject has less
than 150 feet of street frontage, the applicant must explore any op�ion for shared
access with the adjacent parcel. If shared access is not possible or practical, the
driveway shall be placed as far from the intersection as possible.
The existing driveways are not located within the influence area of collector or arterial streets.
Section 18.705.030.H.3 and 4 states that the minimum spacing of driveways and
streets along a collector shall be 200 feet. The minimum s�acing of driveways and
streets along an arterial shall be 600 feet. The minimum spacing of local streets along
a local street shall be 125 feet.
The existing driveways are located along 98th Avenue, which is designated as a
Neighborhood Route.
Public Street Access:
All vehicular access and egress as required in Sections 18.705.030(H) and
18.705.030(I) shall connect directly with a public or private street approved by the city
for public use and shall be maintained at the requ�red standards on a continuous
basis;
The ap p,licant has existing access to SW 98�' Avenue, which is a public street. This criterion
is satisfied.
Walkways:
On-site pedestrian walkways shall comply with the following standards: Walkways
shall extend from the ground floor entrances or from the �round floor landing of stairs,
ramps, or elevators of all commercial, institutional, and industrial uses, to the streets
which provide the required access and egress. Walkways shall provide convenient
connections between buildings in multi-building commercial, institutional, and
industrial complexes. Unless impractical, walkways shall be constructed between
new and existing developments and neighboring developments;
TIGARD CHURCH OF GOD EXPANSION PAGE 8 OF 21 CUP2003-00005
7/28/2003 PUBLIC HEARING STAFF REPORT TO THE HEARINGS OFFICER
The existing facility already has designated walkways to SW 98th Avenue and the applicant
has indicated in the narrative that the sidewalk will provide connectivity to this sidewalk as
required. This criterion is satisfied.
Wherever required walkways cross vehicle access driveways or Parking lots, such
crossings shall be designed and located for pedestrian safety. Required walkways
shall be physically separated from motor vehicle traffic and parking by either a
minimum 6-inch vertical separation (curbed) or a minimum 3-foot horizontal
separation, except that pedestrian crossings of traffic aisles are permitted for
distances no greater than 36 feet if appropriate landscaping, pavement markings, or
contrasting pavement materials are used. Walkways shall be a minimum of four feet in
width, exclusive of vehicle overhangs and obstructions such as mailboxes, benches,
bicycle racks, and sign posts, and shall be in compliance with ADA standards; and
The walkways have been identified on the site plan. All existing walkways are five feet in
width. No proposed walkway is less than 5-feet in width. All proposed walkways across
traffic aisles are less than 36 feet in length, but it has not been determined how those
crossings will be identified. The applicant may propose to mark the crossing at the same
time that the parking lot is restriped. This cnterion is not satisfied.
FINDING: The application fails to identify by which means the parking lot crossings will be
identified.
CONDITION:The applicant shall revise the site plan to .indicate the manner in which
crossings of the traffic aisles will be identified in compliance with TDC Section
18.705.030(F)(3).
Required walkwaxs shall be paved with hard surfaced materials such as concrete,
asphalt, stone, brick, etc. Walkways may be required to be lighted and/or signed as
needed for safety purposes. Soft-surfaced public use pathways may be provided only
if such pathways are provided in addition to required pathways.
The applicant indicates that the new sidewalks will be constructed of concrete. This criterion
has been satisfied.
Minimum Access Requirements for Commercial and Industrial Use:
Section 18.705.030.1 provides the minimum access requirements for commercial and
industrial uses: Table 18.705.3 indicates that the required access width for
developments with more than 100 parking spaces is two 30-foot-wide accesses with a
24-foot pavement width or one 50-foot wide access with 40-feet of pavement.
The TDC Table 18.705.3 requires a minimum of finro, 30-foot accesses with 24-feet of
pavement, or one 50-foot access with 40-feet of pavement. The existing development satisfies
this standard by already providing two 30-foot accesses with pavement widths of 24-feet. This
criterion is satisfied.
Environmental Performance Standards—Cha ter 18.725:
equires a e era an s a e environmen a aws, ru es and regulations be applied to
development within the City of Tigard. Section 18.725.030 PerFormance Standards
regulates: Noise, visible em�ssions, vibration and odors.
Noise. For the purposes of noise regulation, the provisions of Sections 7.41.130
roug 7.40.210 of the Tigard Municipal Code shall apply.
Visible Emissions. Within the Commercial zoning districts and the Industrial Park (I-P)
zoning �s ric , ere shall be no use, operation or activity which results in a stack or
other point- source emission, other than an emission from space heating, or the
emission of pure uncombined water (steam) which is visible from a property line.
Department of Environmental Quality (DEQ) rules for visible emissions (340-21-0'15 and
340-28-070) apply.
TIGARD CHURCH�F GOD EXPANSION PAGE 9 OF 21 CUP2003-00005
7/28/2003 PUBLIC HEARING STAFF REPORT TO THE HEARINGS OFFICER
Vibration. No vibration other than that caused by highway vehicles, trains and aircraft is
perm��d in any given zoning district, which is discernible without instruments at the
property line of the use concerned.
Odors. The emissions of odorous gases or other matter in such quantities as to be
reaai�y detectable at any point beyond the property line of the use creating the odors is
prohibited. DEQ rules for odors (340-028-090) apply.
Glare and heat. No direct or sky reflected glare, whether from floodlights or from high
empera ure processes such as combustion or weldin�, which is visible at the lot line
shafl be permitted, and; 1) there shall be no emission or transmission of heat or
heated air which is discernible at the lot line of the source; and 2) these regulations
shall not apply to siyns or floodli�hts in parking areas or construction equipment at
the time of construction or excavation work otherwise permitted by this title.
Insects and rodents. All materials including wastes shall be stored and all grounds
s a e main aine in a manner which will not attract or aid the propagation of insects
or rodents or create a health hazard.
FINDING: Based on the information provided by the applicant, the expanded use of the
property will conform to the above requirements. If for some reason the above
standards were in question, and it was subsequently found that the use was out
of compliance with any of the above standards, the property owner would be
subject to code enforcement, court review, and possible fines until they were
brought back into compliance. .A search of city records does not indicate any
code enforcement issues associated with the existing use.
Landsca in and Screenin — Cha ter 18.745:
ree rees: ec ion . . s a es a all development proJ ects fronting on a
public street shall be required to plant street trees in accordance with Section
18.745.040.0 Section 18.745.040.0 requires that street trees be spaced between 20
and 40 feet apart depending on the size classification of the tree at maturity (small,
medium or large).
The subject site has 395 feet of frontage along SW 98"' Avenue. Therefore, the development
would require the installation of street trees as prescribed in TDC Chapter 18.745. The
applicant has provided a street tree plan and indicated in the n�rrative that eleven (11) new
street trees will be provided at 30-foot intervals along SW 98 Avenue. The applicants'
landscape architect has proposed to plant flowering cherry trees, which are approved street
trees at 30 feet on center. This proposal meets the species and spacing standards as required
within the chapter. This critenon is satisfied.
Land Use Buffering and Screening:
Buffering and Screening is required between different t�rpes of land uses. It is the intent
of these standards to provide for privacy and protection and reduce or eliminate the
adverse impacts of visual or noise pollution that a development site may impose on
adjacent properties.
The proposed use is in a residential zone and partially abutting residential uses on three
sides, It is also adjacent to a gol�course to the north and east, and to another church directly
south. The facility fronts SW 98h Avenue. In these locations, buffering is.not required. Staff
has visited the site and the buffer area is very large and _has been previously landscaped.
The applicant is proposing to increase the landscaping within the parki�g areas and along
the southern boundary, as well as, planting street trees along SW 98 Avenue. Staff is
confident that the landscaping and screening that is existing, and that is proposed will satisfy
any. need for buffering and screening from this addition. There is no need to require
additional buffering and screening from adjacent uses. This criterion is satisfied.
TIGARD CHURCH OF GOD EXPANSION PAGE 10 OF 21 CUP2003-00005
7/28/2003 PUBLIC HEARING STAFF REPORT TO THE HEARINGS OFFICER
Screening -Special Provisions:
Section 18.745.050.E re uires the screening of arking and loading areas. Landsca ed
parking areas shall include special design features, which effectively screen the parkpng
lot areas from view. Planting materials to be installed should achieve a relative balance
between low lying and vertical shrubbery and trees. Trees shall be planted in
landscaped islands in all parking areas, and shall be equally distributed on the bas�s of
one (1) tree for each seven (7) parking spaces in order to provide a canopy effect. The
minimum dimension on the landscape islands shall be three (3) feet wide and the
landscaping shall be protected from vehicular damage by some form of wheel guard or
curb.
The existing parking area is already compliant with the requirements of the TDC, and the
applicant has provided the City with a landscape plan that demonstrates compliance with the
standards within the TDC around the parking area that is to be restriped. This criterion is
satisfied.
Mixed Solid Waste and Rec clables Stora e— Cha ter 18.755:
ap er . requires a new cons ruc ion incorpora es functional and adequate
space for on-site storage and e�cient collection of mixed solid waste and source
separated Recyclables prior to pick-up and removal by haulers.
The applicant must choose one (1) of the following four (4) methods to demonstrate
compliance: Minimum Standard, V��aste Assessment, Comprehensive Recyclin� Plan,
or Franchised Hauler Review and Sign-Off. The applicant will have to submit evidence
or a plan, which indicates compliance with this section. Re ardless of which method
chosen, the applicant will have to submit a written sign-off�rom the franchise hauler
regarding the facility location and compatibility.
The applicant has stated that the location of the existin� facility will not change and has
indicated that the service provider is satisfied with continumg regular service at that location.
This standard is satisfied.
Location Standards.
To encourag e its use, the storag e area for source-separated recyclable shall be co-
located wit�i the storage area for residual mixed solid waste; fndoor and outdoor
storage areas shall comply with Uniform Building and Fire Code requirements;
Storage area space requirements can be satisfied with a single location or multiple
locations, and can combine both interior and exterior locations; Exterior storage areas
can be located within interior side yard or rear yard areas. Exterior stora e areas shall
not be located within a required front yard setback or in a yard adjacent�o a public or
private,street; Exterior storage areas shall be located in central and visible focations
on a site to enhance securify for users• Exterior storage,areas can be located in a
parking area,, if the proposed use provic�es at least the minimum number of parking
spaces required for the use after deducting the area used for storage. Stora�ge areas
shall be app ropriately screened according to the provisions in 18.755.050 C; design
standards• The storage area shall be accessible for collection vehicles and located so
that the s�orage area will not obstruct pedestrian or vehicle traffic movement on the
site or on public streets adjacent to the site.
The applicant does not intend to change the size or location of the existing facility. The
existing facility is already within the south parking lot. This standard has been met.
Design Standards.
The dimensions of the storage area shall accommodate containers consistent with
current methods of local collection; Storage containers shall meet Uniform Fire Code
standards and be made and covered with waterproof materials or situated in a covered
area; Exterior storage areas shall be enclosed by a sight-obscuring fence wall, or
hedge at least six feet in height. Gate openings which allow access to users and
haulers shall be provided. Gate openings for haulers shall be a minimum of 10 feet
wide and shall be capable of being secured in a closed and open position; Storage
area(s) and containers shall be clearly labeled to indicate the type of materials
accepted.
TIGARD CHURCH OF GOD EXPANSION PAGE 11 OF 21 CUP2003-00005
7/28l2003 PUBLIC HEARING STAFF REPORT TO THE HEARINGS OFFICER
Staff has visited the site and the facility is screened, however, the applicant is proposing to
rebuild the screen with a brick wall of four feet in height. This criterion is not satisfied.
FINDING: The applicant has proposed a four foot high wall to screen the facility; however,
the development code requires a six-foot screen.
CONDITION:Prior to the issuance of building permits, the applicant shall revise the plans to
include provisions for a six-foot wall around the trash enclosure.
Off-Street Parkinq and Loadinq (18.765):
Bisa e - ccessi e ar ing:
All parking areas shall be provided with the required number of parking spaces for
disabled persons as specifiied by the State of Oregon Uniform Building Code and
federal standards. Such parking spaces shall be sized, signed and marked as
required by these regulations.
According to the Ore on Uniform Building Code, a parking facility accommodating 101-150
spaces requires five �) ADA accessible spaces. ,The applicant has indicated that there will
be a total of seven (7) tF�roughout the site. This criterion is satisfied.
Access Drives:
With regard to access to public streets from off-street parking: access drives from the
street to off-street parking or loading areas shall be designed and constructed to
facilitate the flow of traffic and provide maximum safety for pedestrian and vehicular
traffic on the site; the number and size of access drives shall be in accordance with
the requirements of Chapter, 18.705, Access, Egress and Circulation; access drives
shall be clearly and permanently marked and defined through use of rails, fences,
walls or other barriers or markers on frontage not occupied by service drives; access
drives shall have a minimum vision clearance in accordance with Chapter 18.795,
Visual Clearance; access drives shall be improved with an asphalt or concrete
surface; and excluding single-family and duplex residences, except as provided by
Subsection 18.810.030.P, groups of two or more parking spaces shall be served by a
service drive so that no backing movements or other maneuvering within a street or
other public right-of-way will be required.
The applicant is proposing to utilize the two existing accesses. The TDC requires two,
30-foot accesses with twenty-four feet of pavement. This criterion is satisfied.
Loading/unloading driveways:
A driveway designed for continuous forward flow of passenger vehicles for the
purpose of loading and unloading passengers shall be located on the site of any
school or other meeting place which is designed to accommodate more than 25
people at one time.
The applicant did not specifically address this criterion, however, a visit to the site and review
of the site plan indicates that this criterion is easily.satisfied by the location of the two (2)
accesses and the main entrance. This criterion is satisfied.
Parking Lot Striping:
Except for single-family and duplex residences, any area intended to be used to meet
the off-street parking requirements as contained in this Chapter.shall have all parking
spaces clearlY marked; and all interior drives and access aisles shall be clearly
marked and signed to show direction of flow and maintain vehicular and pedestrian
safety.
The applicant has indicated that the parkin� lot will be restriped and has indicated striping on
the plans. However, the applicants restriping plan does not include provisions to mark
access aisles and direction of flow. This criterion has not been met.
FINDING: The applicant does not clearly mark the access aisles and direction of flow as
required.
TIGARD CHURCH OF GOD EXPANSION PAGE 12 OF 21 CUP2003-00005
7/28l2003 PUBLIC HEARING STAFF REPORT TO THE HEARINGS OFFICER
CONDITION:Prior to the issuance of building permits, the applicant shall submit a revised
site plan that shows that all access aisles, parking spaces, and direction of flow
are clearly identified and marked as part of the parking lot striping.
Space and Aisle Dimensions:
Table 18.765.1. outlines the minimum dimensions for angled parking.
The parkin areas are pre-existing and staff has reviewed the areas that are to be restriped.
According,�o the site plan, the dimensional requirements of the restriped parking areas meet
the minimum dimensional requirements as outlined in Table 18.765.1 for 90 degree parking.
Minimum Bicycle Parking Requirements:
The total number of req uired bicycle parking spaces for each use is specified in Table
18.765.2 in Section 18.765.070.H.
The TDC requires one (1) parking space for every 20 seats in the main assembly area. The
applicant has mdicated that the main sanctuary currently seats 160 patrons. Therefore, the
applicant is required to provide eight (8) sQaces for bicycles. The applicant has indicated that
although there is no existing bike rack on site, they will construct a five stall space at the front of
the sanctuary. This criterion is not satisfied.
FINDING: The applicant has not adequately addressed the minimum bicycle parking
requirements and design standards as required by TDC Sections 18.765.050 and
18.765.070.
CONDITION: Prior to the issuance of building permits, the applicant shall revise the parking
plan to accommodate 8 bicycle-parking spaces. Said spaces must be designed
and constructed to the standards that are identified in TDC Section 18.765.050.
Minimum Off-Street Parking:
Section 18.765.070.H states that the minimum and maximum parking shall be as
required in Table 18.765.2.
As a result of a code amendment by the Tigard City Council in March, 2002, religious
institutions must provide one (1) parking space for every three (3) seats in the main assembly
area. With seating for 160 in the main sanctuary, the church is required to provide a
minimum of 53 off-street parking spaces. The applicant has exceeded the minimum parking
requirements. The church is in parking zone B, therefore, the maximum amount of parking
they can provide is one (1) space for every 1.3 seats or in this case 123 spaces. The
applicant is proposing a total of 107. This criterion is satisfied.
Off-street loading requirements:
Off-street loading spaces: Commercial, industrial and institutional buildings o�
structures to be bu�lt or altered which receive and distribute material or merchandise
by truck shall provide and maintain off-street loading and maneuvering space as
follows:
1. A minimum of one loading space is required for buildings with 10,000 gross
square feet or more;
2. A minimum of two loading spaces for buildings with 40,000 gross square feet or
more.
Off-street loading dimensions:
1. Each loading berth shall be approved by the City Engineer as to design and
location;
2. Each loading space shall have sufficient area for turning and maneuvering of
vehicles on the site. At a minimum, the maneuvering length shall not be less than
twice the overall length of the longest vehicle using the facility site; .
3. Entrances and exits for the loading areas shall be provided at locations approved
by the City Engineer in accordance with Chapter 18.710;
TIGARD CHURCH OF GOD EXPANSION PAGE 13 OF 21 CUP2003-00005
7l28/2003 PUBLIC HEARING STAFF REPORT TO THE HEARINGS OFFICER
4. Screening for ofF-street loading facilities is required and shall be the same as
screening for parking lots in accordance with Chapter 18.745.
Because of the size of the overall building, the church would be required to provide one (1)
off-street loading space to meet the standard. The applicant contends that the church does not
receive or distribute merchandise. Unfortunately the development code does not differentiate
when the overall gross building size is 10,000 square feet or more. This criterion is not
satisfied.
FINDING: The applicant has not addressed the need for off-street loading facilities as
required by TDC Section 18.765.080.
CONDITION: Prior to site work, the applicant shall revise the parking plan to include one (1)
off-street loading space. Said space shall be desi ned and constructed to meet
the dimensional criteria in TDC Section 18.765.080�6).
Tree Removal — Cha ter 18.790
ec ion . . requires at a tree Ptan for the planting, removal and protection of
trees prepared by a certified arborist be provided for a conditional use application.
The tree plan shall include identification of all existing trees, Identification of a
program to save existing trees or mitigate tree removal over 12 inches in caliper,
identification of which trees are proposed to be removed, and a protection pro ram
defining standards and methods that will be used by the applicant to protect �rees
during and after construction.
The plan shows 25 trees on site over twelve inches in diameter. Of those trees, the applicant
is certain that two (2), possibly three (3) will need to be removed to accommodate
construction. In the worse case scenario, the applicant is still maintaining,88% of those trees
on site that are over 12 inches in diameter. Therefore, no mitigation is necessary. The
applicant has provided a tree protection plan from Terrill Collier, certified arborist. To ensure
that the tree protection measures are in place, and the tree preservation plan is
implemented, the following conditions shall apply.
FINDING: The applicant has proposed to retain 88% percent of trees over twelve inches
on site and is not subJ ect to any required tree mitigation in accordance with
TDC Section 18.790.030. In order to insure the viability of the existing trees
and those trees within the area of work, the following conditions shall apply
CONDITIONS:
. The applicant shall comply with the protection measures prescribed by
the consulting arborist.
. The applicant shall provide the city arborist with a constnaction sequence
including installation and removal of tree protection devices, clearing,
grading, and paving.
. The applicant shall notify the city arborist when tree protection measures
are in place so that he may verifjr that the measures will function properly
prior to construction.
Visual Clearance Areas — Cha ter 18.795:
ec ion . . . s a es a e provisions of this chapter shall apply to.all
development including the construction of new structures, the remodeling of existing
structures and to a c-hange of use which increases the on-site parking or loading
requirements or which changes the access requirements.
Section 18.795.030.B. states that a clear vision area shall contain no vehicle, hedge,
planting, fence, wall structure or temporary or permanent obstruction (except for an
occasional utility pole or tree), exceeding three feet in height, measured from the top
of the curb, or where no curb exists, from the street center line grade, except that
trees exceeding this height may be located in this area, provided all branches below
eight feet are removed.
TIGARD CHURCH OF GOD EXPANSION PAGE 14 OF 21 CUP2003-00005
7/28/2003 PUBLIC HEARING STAFF REPORT TO THE HEARINGS OFFICER
There are no proposed structures inside of the vision clearance area and the applicant has
stated in the narrative, that all landscaping within the vision clearance area will be maintained
as re�uired by the Tigard Development Code. On-going maintenance of the vision clearance
triang e is required and any violation of this trian�le, will be addressed through the City of
Tigard Code Enforcement process. This standard is satisfied.
C. ADDITIONAL SITE DEVELOPMENT REVIEW APPROVAL CRITERIA
Section 18.360.090(A)(2) through 18.360.090(A)(15) provides additional Site DeveloQment
Review approval standards not necessarily covered by the provisions of the previously
listed sections. These additional standards are addressed immediately below with the
following exceptions:
The proposal contains no elements related to the provisions of the following and are, therefore,
found to be inapplicable as approval standards:
18.360.090.3 (Exterior Elevations);); 18.360.090.5 (Privacy and Noise: Multi-family or Group
Living Uses); 18.360.090.6 (Private Outdoor Areas: Multi-family Use); 18.360.090.7 (Shared
Outdoor Recreation Areas: Multi-family Use); 18.360.090.8 (100-year floodplain) and
18.360.090.9 (Demarcation of Spaces).
The following sections were discussed previously in this decision and, therefore, will not be
addressed in this section:
18.360.090.13 Parkin�); 18.360.090.12 (Landscaping); 18.360.090.13 (Drainage); and
18.360.090.14 �Provision for the Disabled); 18.360 090.15 (Provisions of the underlying zone).
Com liance with all of the a licable re uirements of this title includin Cha ter 18.810
ree an i i an ar s:
As discussed in this report, all applicable sections have been addressed and where the
proposal is deficient, staff has recommended conditions to ensure compliance.
Relationship to the Natural and Physical Environment:
Buildings shall be: located to preserve existing trees, topography and natural
drainage where possible based upon existing site conditions; located in areas not
subject to ground slumping or sliding; located to provide adequate distance between
adjoining buildings for adequate light, air circulation, and fire-fighting; and oriented
with consideration for sun and wind. Trees shall be preserved to the extent possible.
Replacement of trees is subject to the requirements of Chapter 18.790, Tree Removal.
The applicant has proposed to retain 88% of the trees on site that are over 12 inches in
diameter. There are no extraordinary physical or natural restraints that would dictate the
placement of the expansion. No buildmgs or structures are proposed that will hinder air
circulation, or prevent fire-fighting apparatus .from performing their jobs. The proposed
structures do not exceed the allowed height. This criterion has been met.
Buffering, screening, and compatibility between adjoining uses:
Bufferin� shall be provided between different types of fand uses and decreased noise
levels, air pollution, visual barrier, on site screening of service areas, storage areas,
parking lots, and mechanical devices on roof tops shall be considered in determining
the intensity of the buffer or screen.
Buffering and screenin� has been addressed elsewhere in this report, and has been
conditioned such that it will meet this criterion.
Crime Prevention and Safety:
. Windows shall be located so that areas vulnerable to crime can be surveyed by
the occupants;
. Interior laundry and service areas shall be located in a way that they can be
observed by others;
TIGARD CHURCH OF GOD EXPANSION PAGE 15 OF 21 CUP2003-00005
7/28/2003 PUBLIC HEARING STAFF REPORT TO THE HEARINGS OFFICER
. Mail boxes shall be located in lighted areas having vehicular or pedestrian
traffic;
. The exterior lighting levels shalt be selected and the angles shall be oriented
towards areas vulnerable to crime; and
. Light fixtures shall be provided in areas having heavy pedestrian or vehicular
traffic and in potentially dangerous areas such as parking lots, stairs, ramps
and abrupt grade changes. Fixtures shall be �laced at a height so that light
patterns overlap at a height of seven feet, which is sufficient to illuminate a
person.
The City of Ti�ard Police Department has reviewed this project and has not indicated concern
or objection with the proposal. The crime prevention standards have been satisfied.
Public Transit:
Provisions within the plan shall be included for providing for transit if the development
proposal is adjacent to existing or proposed transit route; the requirements for transit
facilities shall be based on: the location of other transit facilities in the area; and the
size and tyPe of the proposal. The following facilities may be required after City and
Tri-Met review: bus stop shelters; turnouts for buses; and connecting paths to the
shelters.
There are no transit services adjacent to this site. The nearest stops to this site are located
at SW Hall Blvd. This criterion is satisfied.
D. STREET AND UTILITY IMPROVEMENTS STANDARDS - CHAPTER 18.810
Chapter 18.810 provides construction standards for the implementation of public and
private facilities and utilities such as streets, sewers, and drainage. The applicable
standards are addressed below:
Streets:
Improvements:
Section 18.810.030.A.1 states that streets within a development and streets adjacent
shall be improved in accordance with the TDC standards.
Section 18.810.030.A.2 states that any new street or additional street width planned as
a portion of an existing street shall be dedicated and improved in accordance with the
TDC.
Minimum Rights-of-Way and Street Widths: Section 18.810.030(E) requires an arterial
street to have a 60 to74 to 122-foot right-of-way width and 12-foot travel lanes. Other
improvements required may include on-street parking, sidewalks and bikeways,
underground utilities, street lighting, storm drainage, and street trees.
This site lies adjacent to SW 98`h Avenue, which is classified as a Neighborhood Route on
the City of Tigard Transportation Plan Map. At present, there is approximately 55 feet of
right-of way (ROW), according to the most recent tax assessor's map. The applicant has
submitted a copy of a Street Dedication document from 1978 that shows an additional 5 feet
of ROW dedicated to the public. This brings the total ROW along the frontage to 60 feet.
This exceeds the minimum ROW required for a Neighborhood Route.
SW 98th is fully improved except for street trees. The applicant's plan indicates they will
plant street trees according to the required spacing. The applicant has requested that they
be allowed to plant the street trees east of the sidewalk because the existing planter strip is
only 4' wide. The street trees may be planted east of the sidewalk as long as they are at
least 2' away.
TIGARD CHURCH OF GOD EXPANSION PAGE 16 OF 21 CUP2003-00005
7/28/2003 PUBLIC HEARING STAFF REPORT TO THE HEARINGS OFFICER
Sidewalks: Section 18.810.070.A requires that sidewalks be constructed to meet City
design standards and be located on both sides of arterial, collector and local
residential streets.
There is an existing sidewalk along 98�' Avenue. No sidewalk improvements are required.
Sanitary Sewers:
Sewers Required: Section 18.810.090.A requires that sanitary sewer be installed to
serve each new development and to connect developments to existing mains in
accordance with the provisions set forth in Design and Construction Standards for
Sanitary and Surface Water Management (as adopted by Clean Water Services in 1996
and includ�ng any future revisions or amendments) and the adopted policies of the
comprehensive plan.
Over-sizin�: Section 18.810.090.0 states that proposed sewer systems shall include
consideration of additional development within the area as projected by the
Comprehensive Plan.
The closest sewer line is an 8-inch line in Brentwood Place to the east. The applicant's plan
shows a sewer lateral from the proposed addition connecting to the sewer located in
Brentwood Place. This standard is satisfied.
Storm Drainage:
General Provisions: Section 18.810.100.A states requires developers to make
adequate provisions for storm water and flood water runoff.
Accommodation of Upstream Drainage: Section 18.810.100.0 states that a culvert or
other drainage facility shall be large enough to accommodate potential runoff from its
entire upstream drainage area, whether inside or outside the development. The City
Engineer shall approve the necessary size of the facility, based on the provisions of
Design and Construction Standards for Sanitary and Surface Water Management (as
adopted by Clean Water Services in 2000 and including any future revisions or
amendments).
There are no existing upstream drainage areas that affect this site.
Effect on Downstream Drainage: Section 18.810.100.D states that where it is
anticipated by the City Engineer that the additional runoff resulting ,from the
development will overload an ex�sting drainage facility, the Director and Engineer shall
withhold approval of the development unt�l provisions have been made for
improvement of the potential condition or until provisions have been made for storage
of additional runoff caused by the development in accordance with the Design and
Construction Standards for Sanitary and Surface Water Management (as adopted by
. Clean Water Services in 2000 and including any future revisions or amendments).
In 1997, Clean Water Services (CWS) completed a basin study of Fanno Creek and adopted
the Fanno Creek Watershed Management Plan. Section V of that plan includes a
recommendation that local governmenfs institute a stormwater detention/effective impervious
area reduction program resulting in no net increase in storm peak flows up to the 25-year
event. The City will require that all new developments resulting in an increase of impervious
surfaces provide onsite detention facilities, unless the development is located adjacent to
Fanno Creek. For those developments adjacent to Fanno Creek, the storm water runoff will
be permitted to discharge without detention.
The net new impervious surface area is only 3233 sf. Therefore, detention is not required.
The stormwater runoff from the new impervious surface will be collected in a 4-inch rain drain
that will connect to a 6-inch storm line. The 6-inch line will transmit the flow to a water quality
swale on the south side of the parking lot. The outflow from the swale will connect to the
existing catch basin at the south west corner of the parking lot.
TIGARD CHURCH OF GOD EXPANSION PAGE 17 OF 21 CUP2003-00005
7/28/2003 PUBLIC HEARING STAFF REPORT TO THE HEARINGS OFFICER
Bikeways and Pedestrian Pathways:
Bikeway Extension: Section 18.810.110.A states that develoQments adjoining
Proposed bikeways identified on the City's adopted pedestrian/bikeway plan shall
include provisions for the future extension of such bikeways through the dedication of
easements or right-of-way.
SW 98�' Aven�e is designated as a bicycle facility. There is an existing bikeway along the
east side of 98 Avenue. No additional improvements are warranted.
Utilities:
Section 18.810.120 states that all utility lines, but not limited to those required for
electric, communication, lighting and cable television services and related facilities
shall be placed underground, except for surface mounted transformers, surface
mounted connection boxes and meter cabinets which max be placed above �round,
temporary utility service facilities during construction, high capacity electric lines
operating at 50,000 volts or above, and:
. The developer shall make all necessary arrangements with the serving utility to
provide the under round services;
. The City reserves�he right to approve location of all surFace mounted facilities;
. All underground utilities, including sanitary sewers and storm drains installed in
streets by the developer, shall be consfructed prior to the surfacing of the
streets; and
. Stubs for service connections shall be long enough to avoid disturbing the
street improvements when service connections are made.
Exception to Under-Grounding Requirement: Section 18.810.120.0 states that a
developer shall pay a fee in-lieu of under-grounding costs when the development is
proposed to take place on a street where existing utilities which are not underground
will serve the development and the approval authority determines that the cost and
technical difficulty of under-grounding the utilities outwei�hs the benefit of under-
grounding in con1 unction with the development. The determination shall be on a case-
by-case basis. The most common, but not the only, such situation is a short frontage
development for which under-grounding would result in the placement of additional
poles, rather than the removal of above-ground utilities facilities. An applicant for a
develoPment which is served by utilities which are not underground and which are
located across a public right-of-way from the applicant's property shall pay a fee in-
lieu of under-grounding.
There are existing overhead utility lines along the frontage of SW 98�' Avenue. If the fee
in-lieu is proposed, it is equal to $27.50 per lineal foot of street frontage that contains the
overhead lines. The frontage along this site is 395 lineal feet; therefore the fee would be
$10,862.00.
ADDITIONAL CITY ANDIOR AGENCY CONCERNS WITH STREET AND UTILITY
Public Water S stem: �
is si e is serve y ity of Tigard Water. The applicant indicates the existing water service
is adequate to serve the addition.
Storm Water Qualit :
e iy as agreed to enforce Surface Water Management (SWM) regulations
established by Clean Water Services (CWS) Design and Construction Standards
(adopted by Resolution and Order No. 00-7) which.require the construction of on-site
water quality facilities. The facilities shall be designed to remove 65 percent of the
phosphorus contained in 100 percent of the storm water runoff generated from newly
created impervious surFaces. In addition, a maintenance plan shall be submitted
indicating the frequency and method to be used in keeping the facility maintained
through the year.
TIGARD CHURCH OF GOD EXPANSION PAGE 18 OF 21 CUP2003-00005
7/28l2003 PUBLIC HEARING STAFF REPORT TO THE HEARINGS OFFICER
Prior to construction, the applicant shall submit plans and calculations for a water quality
facility that will meet the intent of the CWS Design Standards. In addition, the applicant shall
submit a maintenance plan for the facility that must be reviewed and approved by the City
prior to construction.
To ensure compliance with Clean Water Services design and construction standards, the
applicant shall employ the design engineer responsible for the design and specifications of
the private water quality facility to perform construction and visual observation of the water
quality facility for compliance with the design and specifications. These inspections shall be
made at significant stages throughout the pro�ect and at completion of the construction. Prior
to final buiiding inspection, the design engineer shall provide the City of Tigard (Inspection
Supervisor) with written confirmation that the water quality facility is in compliance with the
design and specifications.
Gradin and Erosion Control:
esiy n an ons ruc ion Standards also regulate erosion control to reduce the
amount of-sediment and other pollutants reaching the public storm and surface water
system resultiny from development, construction, rading, excavating, clearing, and
any other activi�y which accelerates erosion. Per �WS regulations, fhe app licant is
required to submit an erosion control plan for City review and approvaf prior to
issuance of City permits.
The Federal Clean Water Act requires that a National Pollutant Discharge Elimination
System (NPDES) erosion control permit be issued for any development that will
disturb five or more acres of land. Since this site is over five acres, the developer will
be required to obtain an NPDES permit from the City prior to construction. This permit
will be issued along with the site and/or building permit.
The Buildin Division will review the grading and erosion control plans for this development
as a part of�he site permit review.
E. IMPACT STUDY:
ec ion . . . e states that the applicant shall provide an impact study to
quantify the effect of development on public fac�lities and services. For each public
facility system and type of impact, the study shall propose improvements necessary to
meet C�ty standards, and to minimize the impact of the development on the public at
large, public facilities systems, and affected private property users.
In situations where the Community Development Code requires the dedication of real
propertx interests, the applicant sfiall either specifically concur with a requirement for
public right-of-way dedication, or provide evidence thaf supports that the real property
dedication is not roughly proportional to the projected impacts of the development.
The applicant has submitted an impact study addressing the required elements above.
ROUGH PROPORTIONALITY ANALYSIS
Based on a transportation impact study prepared by Mr. David Larson for the A-Boy
Expansion/Dolan/Resolution 95-61, TIF's are expected to recapture 32 percent of the traffic
impact of new development. Presently, the TIF for this project is estimated at $5,607.
According to the Washington County TIF ordinance, 32 percent of a projects impacts are met
by its TIF assessment in Tigard. This leaves 68% unmitigated. The actual cost of system
improvements per trip generated by new development on the Tigard street system can be
determined by the foflowing equation (Larson, Mackenzie Engineering, Dolan Findings, June
1995): $1,053 divided by .32 equals $3,303.12.
($1,053 is theTlF assessment according to the Washington County TIF ordinance effective
July 1, 2003).
Less miti ated costs
e app icant is no required to make any dedications or improvements outside of what was
proposed.
TIGARD CHURCH OF GOD EXPANSION PAGE 19 OF 21 CUP2003-00005
7/28/2003 PUBLIC HEARING STAFF REPORT TO THE HEARINGS OFFICER
Estimate of Unmiti ated Im acts
umpac ........ ............................................................................ 3,303.12
Less TIF Assessment ...................................................................... 1 053
s ima e o nmi iga e mpac s , . 2
FINDING: Using the above cost factors, it can be determined that there are no
unmi�igated impacts and, therefore, the proposed improvements and imposed
conditions are roughly proportional and justified.
SECTION VIII. OTHER STAFF COMMENTS
The City of Tigard Building Division has reviewed the proposal and stated that the
proximity of the new admin. building to the existing church will require modifications to the
existing church. The modification will entail 1 hr. walls with parapets and possibiy no
openings (doors). The new admin. building will be required to meet all applicable building
codes.
The City of Tigard Engineering Department was sent this proposal for review and the
comments have been incorporated into this report.
The City of Tigard Operations Utility Manager has reviewed this application and has
indicated that all utility work should be coordinated with the City. Sanitary, and Storm are
private. He also indicated that the applicant needs to supplement the existing water meter
with a backflow device. Contact Rich Sattler at the Tigard Water District.
The City of Ti�ard Arborist has reviewed this application and has indicated that the tree
protection fencing was not shown on the plan as indicated in the arborist report. He also
indicated that the tree inventory and health report were not included in the report. Staff has
recommended that the applicant notify the city s arborist prior to site work so that he can
ensure protection measures are in place and functioning; The trees that would potentially be
affected were shown on the tree planting plan. The city arborist can be reached at (503)
639-4171, ext. 2589
City of Tigard Police Department has reviewed this application and offered no comments
or ob�ections.
SECTION IX. AGENCY COMMENTS
Clean Water Services has reviewed the proposal and indicated that the applicant needs to
adjust the water quality swale as needed to provide required treatment.
Tualatin Valley Fire and Rescue has reviewed this application and has provided the
following comments:
�� FIRE APPARATUS ACCESS ROAD DISTANCE FROM BUILDING AND TURNAROUNDS:
ccess roa s s a e wit m eet o a portions o t e extenor wa o t e irst story o
the building as measured by an a proved route around the exterior of the building. An
approved furnaround is required i� the remaining distance to an approved intersecting
roadway, as measured along the fire apparatus access road, is greater than 150 feet. (UFC
Sec. 902.2.1)
2� DEAD END ROADS: Dead end fire apparatus access roads in excess of 150 feet in length
s a e provi e with an approved turnaround. Diagrams of approved turnarounds are
available from the fire district. (UFC Sec. 902.2.2.4)
3� PAINTED CURBS: Where required, fire apparatus access roadway curbs shall be painted
ye ow an mar ed "NO PARKING FIRE LANE" at each 25 feet. Lettenng shall have a
stroke of not less than one inch wide by six inches high. Lettering shall be white on red or
black on yellow background. (UFC Sec. 901.4.5.2)
TIGARD CHURCH OF GOD EXPANSION PAGE 20 OF 21 CUP2003-00005
7/28/2003 PUBLIC HEARING STAFF REPORT TO THE HEARINGS OFFICER
a� COMMERCIAL BUILDINGS - REQUIRED FIRE FLOW: The re�uired fire flow for the
ui ing s a not excee , ga ons per minute or the available GPM in the water
delivery system at 20 psi, whichever is less. A worksheet for calculating the required fire
flow is available from the Fire Marshal's Office. (UFC Sec. 903.3)
s� COMMERCIAL BUILDINGS - FIRE HYDRANTS: No portion of the exterior of a commercial
ui ing s a e ocate more t an eet rom a fire hydrant when measured in an
approved manner around the outside of the building and along an approved fire apParatus
access roadway. Any hydrants that are left over from the minimum number of hydrant
calculations may be full filled by hydrants that are up to 500 feet from any point of the
building. The fire Prevention Ordinance has further requirements that need fo be used for
acceptance and placement of fire hydrants. (UFC Sec. 903.4.2.1)
s� COMMERCIAL BUILDINGS - MINIMUM NUMBER OF FIRE HYDRANTS: The minimum
num er o ire y rants or a ui m� s a e ase on t e require ire ow prior to giving
credit for fire protection systems divided by 150Q. If the answer is equal to or greater than
x.5 the next whole number of hydrants shall be used. There shall not be less than 2
hydrants per building. (UFC Sec. 903.4.2.1)
7� Considerations for lacin fire h drants shall be as follows:
. xisting y rants in t e area may e use to meet the required number of hydrants;
however, hydrants that are over 500 feet away from the nearest point of the subject
building shall not contribute to the required number of hydrants. .
. Hydrants that are separated from the sub�ect building by railroad tracks shall not
contribute to the required number of hydrants.
• Hydrants that are separated from the subject building by divided highway, freeway, or
heavily traveled collector streets shall not contribute to the required number of
hydrants.
• Hydrants that are accessible only by a bridge shall be acceptable to contribute to the
required number of hydrants only if apProved by the Chief.
• Private hydrants or public hydrants that are on adjacent private property shall not
contribute to the required number of hydrants for the subjecf building. �Exce tio_n: The
use of hydrants located on other private property may be considered i t ef h ir locations
and access are encumbered in a legal document (such as deed restriction) by the
owners of the involved parcels of proPerty. The encumbrance may be lifted only after
approvals by the Chief on behalf of the fire department and any other governmental
agencies that may require approval.
. When evaluating the placement of hydrants at apartment or industrial complexes the
first hydrant(s) to be placed shall be at the pnmary access and any secondary access
to the site. �4fter these hydrants have been placed other hydrants shall be sited to
meet the above requirements for spacing and minimum number of hydrants. (UFC
Sec. 903.4.2.1.1)
s. ACCESS AND FIRE FIGHTING WATER SUPPLY DURING CONSTRUCTION: Approved
ire apparatus access roa ways an ire ig ting water supp ies s a e installed and
operational prior to any other construction on fhe site or subdivision. (UFC Sec. 8704)
Portland General Electric, Ti�ard/Tualatin School District, NW Natural Gas, and
Verizon were give e opportunity to review this proposal and submitted no comments or
objections.
�z� �� July 21, 2003
PREPARED BY: Brad Kilby DATE
�_—..
Associate Planner
� �' �
f __ `
� � �-e- Julv 21, 2003
APPRO ED BY: Richa ewersdorff DATE
Plan-' g Manager
TIGARD CHURCH OF GOD EXPANSION PAGE 21 OF 21 CUP2003-00005
7/28/2003 PUBLIC HEARING STAFF REPORT TO THE HEARINGS OFFICER
Q . �
ST ER .
HGEOORAPHIC INFORMAf10N tYiTFM
YICIMITY MAP
p O J
� W � a
Y
E' Q �' O � � � � � � � �
R � Q o CUPZ003-00005
KAB EST \ � a - - - - - - - -
s — — — — — — — —
TIGARD CHURCH OF
GOD EXPANSION
����,��"o
��
�
�
�
DR
O D ,./.'r tl,vns Fr:rsp
� _._.
;" Rn
. 2 r- :, .:
ao�.- ='
4
� m Fi . ��-�+
Q� � �`! � � . .
Cn O `��__ .•c.� .,. c• �i •� �
, , �
� � u�� , -•1
,..
2 a � �-���� � �
--! 3P�� � H'1NI�A _
n
� �...-----� • ���-` �
G �"� •
� �F.EF6FNOF0. 7U IeJJ � .
�.�"�'�" �"1��
OVI �' �..:� .. �
a m �. Tlpvd An�M�p . '
o m -� I
� z �
n N
�
G e 0 100 200 300 100 Fee!
R�'�'�� � ,•�-320 Isal
O p�
m City of Tigard
RD DU
Inform�tion on thia m�p i�for psnenl Ixatlon only and
thouk bs wrlfisd wilh Na D�wlopnent Servias Division.
W 1�725 SW Hdl BIvE
. � TipaM,OR 97223
, U (503)639-4171
hdp:/Iwww.ei.tlqard.or.ui
Community Development Plot date:Jun 10,2003;C:lmagiclMAGIC03.APR
H
� � � �'
� � 3
N. � k W � �� �
m T.
�' � — SW 98T" AVENUE 70 �
G - , r— -�r
`\ � _ �J' I�vM do 1HO1]1
O D � � ` �` ° p � a ti`� ��s
� • O .� �Y' .a�" 'fv�fw!' � � \M+ ��l
.
� . .... ..:: .: .. ..� ...�
� m � � _ � _ — — �e. .K�� '.F'n Y ..r ;;�.. .:d��ti:._. _, .� L t i� . y .��p
. ._ .,. — b .., .. .R�:1
- � nnd 7drJSO -- — — — — '� •.—~.__
� �} —�— ^— ; -5J7df!!.W! M]�'bQ/ �i (.)Y/ y— _� .
� t Han_��\ � ; �� —_— —_� e _�� aat _�___ �
� � x•� -- '° ^" `�� �``� � ---- > y � ;r'
.�
Z � �r -� y� a°� � ' � �a rvrtso-a f �n
',� t r'� � ��' k �r� ,��end lH�
� � ur�ro�o oHr
� , � v nJSr3 30[+i,f 4
rr �t �r ��`+ n•»�.� t ,n w.m ' � *
• �4 `� �� �5
� �� oo� . °n:a�.. i.�XM'�o � � = • ` 4 F,c ' �' �
C �..l�� S k y
�ti� ` i1a��t ew�Yr p0�'' e t I M I s \ i ' �
v �� Lb'.X� eJetu/1 1 __—___ . — � Q r�
�;•.: M1r.0 iww '.�
V �� �
.�� � ��
SRMI nM 14 "�tfni�e � • .I
� a f`'` 1 II ` `` I 4t
� �` ` , Y1. �' • y �l ` I� �
Iti �
'_... �t �� \ o a+ir�a'�vuri * � / �
'robt �� ,'�/ .��r—�� . � 1 '+ �
v�w � � ' � � 5 ,
.i a
i�w i� e.w I b
• ,�_. s�r,✓ d �a. I y
� �a.r ' so,vn oHr tuu w + � i`F .a,�,v � �
L�Y)J]Y MIIM'IYO OMI I � �
� �s175QN/1 I'O.! 7lL1V ��� I :
�g if / � I �AwV ^ M
L p�Iysl!! � .
'� .i �, ` 'u � � � + ,. ^�Y
:
� "�i w� `� � �`�
� .�r a. .
a =_ � i ,
� '� �� �'f�rlbf:aWJ �% fIJiV l '�1 � A�'w ��4� ��+� t
v �� Il�.I � ` ' rV �IM..wlu
010� ""'s.,,,." ��� � I N�D'/lH.� 'JN115/X3 ��M
r.a a�..L . � < . ..
A ��,° ,.b� .S�i4oli',P�d. J' i'' ��
.Z r tp' � � n..uuaa� .'I,� �r{. ;: .�aa nao..,. y
^ � wsn:�svv w � R oiv�aw.u.� :.! �3
�C C � �.'w�'•• n 9N/07(/) � i n.ri+r,w 't Il
� n ,�.M a."zns.o�,. O/1YH15/�/�qM�3;�N �� ',I ;a ;4 �...�a.�,.
= N � � -- ' F'.i \ i'G, ,5;.�"L7�6"X`:b"� _ ———
� � �ou�aa.r ` •
� � rIY • �8U N :. , M ` `�� , Q
0 � ; c u„ `'r` .i .s. � � I �
T W �'w'�i.�r. Y .ro wu �`, .. . ~��^r p,� �. � K a R.
� p � s,r "�'. � I .« _... ' � g ' 'C` ` �-N> ».,. ��J �y �� .,.. -�
OO � i��wit IMMWU iit 4K� `i[ \ \
O TQ illJ• ' � ~ 1
vO TMW� �RI.M �� ff � ✓ I e �\ 4�. � /�'a.0i�r. .M• 1
T � t[i/ AI)♦ � {'A'il ,� ��
x �� / %OI O \\ ` � D,I�
iLN��'A' .J' �• � �
't \ •� iNe//•,,� y�^
� I � �/ � � � :tH. .�`�i� .
H
�
Z "
CITY 4F TIGARD PLANNING DIVISION �� � �
. .
EXHIBIT..,�._
Zaik/Miller Associates
Attn: Jackie Root CUP2003-00005
2340 NW Thurman Street, Suite 201 TIGARD CHURCH OF GOD EXPANSION
Portland, OR 97210
Tigard Church of God
Attn: Bruce Plunkett
15670 SW 98th Avenue
Tigard, OR 97224
Edward Whitehead
9230 SW View Terrace
Tigard, OR 97224
Jim Omundson
16855 SW 129th Avenue
King City, OR 97224
Bruce Plunkett
12040 SW 119'h Avenue
Tigard, OR 97223
Ray Wolf
8340 SW Godwin Court
Tigard, OR 97223
Office of Community Development
Attn: Jeannie Proctor
328 West Main Street, Suite 100 MS 7
Hillsboro, OR 97123-3967
Q . .
ST TTLER .
HOGfOGRAPHiC iNFOFM�TION SVSTEM
YICINITY MAP
� w O J
� a
= Y
� Q � O � � � � � � � �
� W �
oR � Q CUP2003-00005
KABLE ST s�
TIGARD CHURCH OF
GOD EXPANSION
��.��o
��
��
��
�
DR
=.:n+iCMS GER
` ) RD
``' = r no '�.
� m c�`� _._.�
� � u` ,6
m o � _ �'° "1 � �
. .
�-�. , � .
o . ._ >�,
suu :.
� ; � ....._zf._..___pa
r-- . � or; �� '�'e�nru o
G � �- - , �:::� : �: _.
� r�eEFaer+eao ov v,M �A
� - 3 "�.. '
� � " •
�
� � � Tigard Area Map �� 1
� �
�
� N
�
G e 0 100 200 300 400 Feet
R`I r�� � 1"=320 feet
��
m
RD 1 City of Tigard
Dv Infortnation on this map is for peneral location ony and
should be verified rith the Devaloprant Services Division.
73125 SVV Hall BIW
ti
Tiperd,OR 97223
U (503)639-4171
http:l/www.ci.tipard.or.us
Community Development Plot date:Jun 10,2003;C:lmagicWIAGIC03.APR
I
" � --F� --
� ^ -- -- --� ------ --- --
� � - -- 3 - --
..,.,�.
.. —_-_. k � sn �4i
N T e
o =�-��� �- - SW 98�" AVENUE -- ' J70
� � \ C ' �� � 1 � J�VM��0�1�M91Y --._._"_
�+ �� ,� ���y�d . �i � � _ `# •.
� . �. :a\
O �
, .,
\ , ti
^ �i. �.� Q t � �` p �;
� q O � � z _ � ` _
� � � ' .t vr.,Swu.� — __ _ _ �.:— — �o�,. .^,t, �:} r ,�' — �.,,...:` : :;, •� .. r.
v .::. ,n 6 ._ :x'a
' � • Nne JerJm — '�- — — — -R — — -
� � � 4 --� -S71�'!f M3N A'O/�t___��,�ew ss/ -- -- ___ , .
_ mtt �\ \_ ' �-_ --� � / =Na -� ,
� � — �`-' ���,'��� , � E • �
� � � ;
Z � ` 1Y1110-P ` `
� \�\ '
» r>vi r`` A �L/` � ��., / �♦ µ� J/IBnd Jitl
n ,�
\ J t M 5 �\� _ O/lYJR1J0 ONY
�:/ n�sr�w.c«,s
! ��. sr a 'n�ri._.�j <sr h 9 xwn ' ' `'
a �� .� � � �� . �. �=
, ^^, n K�: . .„,s. �A.`.'�1�� a � ' „y
� 'a°'` , �,�::��.,.��, , . °
yarrw a� ; \
v __ _—__ 'y<.-Yi:: aw..�.,...v.._ �`'
f
.vr.v � ' y., �- • ai �i
• xt Ks: � S
� _ - ` i Jy ; �
� �r � .: C il ia 4 .� t` I �
ax � �
__ . � a.aw��n�i v.a:ai � �
• I \� �� , a �
aa./ � +`` ,'./` i'' •nw—I ' ��
83 � � I � � � a
3 �A
' , �3 � a
r�. 3 � i ..,. � � „
• sMne I� ` �
2 �.mcr ' a�rJSONrJ a,vr tui7 a1 �4 � � i`� �d vv
■ Ltl)17N 39M'IYyO ON1'
T y yYJSOMVI C0� �]!ON� I �uI'w I z �
�R � � I � i � �.iw�' w
R
� � .:z 1�z i I ' + ' ���
� vw.w � ,�
a „ i �•�-�.;v,�- � n�,,,� ,.� :
o : - _,,,, ' '. !; ; ... .a,.n, ,.�-�.,
...
wn..:,.. .�:.. ...:;'.. ;:.; . :�:�'�: '.:�.� . � I H9d'/IH.� 9N/15/X3 ' ,.�....a.�,
� -�,. - _ •. .�..�,,,Y„ ,�;.�;r��;�. ' ,�
= n r - � � ��'•6;�€,y�,„=- /t f ik; - .�,,.�, ��g
C , y�vn��tnu w , .avw w.w � _ �3
� C _ ��.s , .�.n,.�o w`JN/O7�l7Q� , - nn vs,w ��:4� ,,.�s..aw..� �
a..'.�s�c+.r
n � I 0(1 Yd'1S/N/[Y6:6'M3N �, ',I ;o i �_l� •�_M.�
= N „�, �-1 .,;b"' _� :
O --- —., _ �, � r , -. .&;.�.\'i'�d� 1� ����— - — -
O0 ''nvw.�i.L=� / � ".w> N; -�. "'n;�u• }�'. . � ��:.�
T W / ' „ '°°"` ^"- � �.;. ; I. I+-..-W.«. —�� a
'n p '� ,.,�rs;,�,»�` ' :F� ��o `�\r``\ � � r ,l5 �� i g
Q �, r.rre nn�e \p� �' i I�,.K C
v O � rou °� c r°t�r k ���� l �\��\ — I.. .• � �
� � °"wv � , � � azt� ,. � ��t.re AA�� ����r / R� .o.�w. �� ��
X � '— r�H, t � — (o"v� � ; — — �-- � �� p°�t
a '► ���—�---�=�- �� ,,�— -- � �� ��� _ °0 ,_o�`"_r�-�,�
z '!` � _, ..�,_ � ,�,s,=.��-�,� �; � , �
H
�
Z
CITY OF TIGARD PLANNING DIVISION ��
I 20 DAYS = I 0/4/2003 CITY OF TIOARD
DATE OF FILING: Communiry�DeveCopment
ShapingA Better Community
CITY OF TIGARD
'Washington County, Oregon
NOTICE OF FINAL ORDER BY THE HEARINGS OFFICER
Case Numbers: CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT CUP 2003-00005
Case Name: TIGARD CHURCH OF GOD EXPANSION
Name of Owner: Ti ard Church of God Attn: Bruce Plunkett
Name of Applicant: Zaik/Miller Associates Attn: Jackie Root
Address of Applicant: 2340 NW Thurman Street Suite 201 Portland Ore on 97210
Address of Property: 15670 SW 98 Avenue Ti ard Ore on 97224
Tax Ma /Lot Nos.: Washin ton Co. Tax Assessor's Ma No. 2S111 CD, Tax Lot 300.
A FINAL ORDER INCORPORATING THE FACTS, FINDINGS AND CONCLUSIONS APPROVING A REQUEST fOR A fONDITIONAL USE PERMIT. THE CITY OF TIGARD
HEARINGS OFFICER HAS REVIEWED THE APPLIfANTS PLANS, NARRATIYE, MATERIALS, LOMMENTS OF REYIEWING AGENCIES, THE PLANNING DIYISION'S STAFF
REPORT AND RECOMMENDATIONS FOR THE APPLIfATION DESfRIBED IN FURTHER DETAII IN TNE STAFF REPORT. THE HEARINGS OFFI[ER NELD A PUBLIC
HEARING ON �ULY 28, 2003 TO REfEIYE TESTIMONY REGARDING THIS APPLICATION. THIS DE[ISION HAS BEEN BASED ON THE FA[TS, FINDINGS AND
CONflUSIONS CONTAINED WITHIN THIS FINAL ORDER.
Request: ➢ The applicant is seeking Conditional Use approval to expand the existing facility by 2,875 square
feet for administrative offices and classrooms, and make site modifications to the parking and
landscaped areas. At the close of the record, the Hearings Officer conditionally approved
all applications subject to the conditions of approval within this final order.
Zone: R-7: Medium-Density Residential District. Apqlicable Review Criteria: Community
Development Code Chapters: 18.330, 18.370, 18.390, 18.510, 18.705, 18.725, 18.745, 18.755,
18.765, 18.780, 18.790, 18.795 and 18.810.
Action: ➢ ❑ Approval as Requested � Approval with Conditions ❑ Denial
Notice: Notice was published in the newspaper and mailed to:
� Owners of Record Within the Required Distance 0 Affected Government Agencies
0 Area Citizen Involvement Team � The Applicants and Owners
The adopted findings of fact and decision can be obtained from the Planning Division/Community
Development Department at the City of Tigard City Hall.
Final Decision:
THIS DECISION IS FINAL ON , 2003 AND BECOMES
EFFECTIVE ON , 2003 UNLESS AN APPEAL IS FILED.
Appeal:
The decision of the Review Authority is final for purposes of appeal on the date that it is mailed. Any parry with
standing as provided in Section 18.390.040.G.1. may appeal this decision in accordance with Section
18.390.040.G.2. of the Tigard Community Development Code which provides that a written appeal together with
the required fee shall be filed with the Director within ten (10) business days of the date the notice of the
decision was mailed. The appeal fee schedule and forms are available from the Planning Division of Tigard
City Hall, 13125 SW Hall Boulevard, Tigard, Oregon 97223.
THE DEADLINE FOR FILING AN APPEAL IS 5:00 PM ON , 2003.
Questions: If you have any questions, please call the City of Tigard Planning Division at (503) 639-4171.
Zaik/Miller Associates
Attn: Jackie Root CUP2003-00005
2340 NW Thurman Street, Suite 201 TIGARD CHURCH OF GOD EXPANSION
Portland, OR 97210
Tigard Church of God
Attn: Bruce Plunkett
15670 SW 98th Avenue
Tigard, OR 97224
AFFIDAVIT OF MAILING CITYOFTIGARD
Community rUevelopme�tt
S(+apingA�dette�Community
I, �atricia L. Guns{orrf, being first duly sworn/affirm, on oath depose and say that I am a SeniorAdministrative SpecraCut for
the City of7`cgarcC�'Waskington County, Oregon and that I served the following:
{Ct�npp�O�priate Box�S�Bebw}
� NOTICE OF PUBLIC HEARING FOR: � CUP2003-00005/TIGARD (HUR[H OF GOD E1(PANSION (1/28/2003)
(File NoJName Reference) (Date of Public Hearing(s)
City of Tigard Planning Director
Tigard Hearings Officer (7/28/2003)
Tigard Planning Commission
Tigard City Council
A copy of the said notice being hereto attached, marked EXhlblt"A",and by reference made a part hereof, was mailed to
each named person(s) at the address(s) shown on the attached list(s), marked Exhlblt'B",and by reference made a part
hereof, on 10h17,2003, and deposited in the United States Mail on lUhl1,2003, postage prepaid.
7
'
.
� _ .
�
; �
� � ( er that repared No ce)
.S�"A2�o��GoN )
County of`iNas ington )ss.
�'i�y of Tigard ) ,
Subscribed and sworn/affirmed before me on the �� day , 2003.
�X��,o OFFICIAL SEAL
.�: ° J BENGTSON
''` ' NOTARY PUBLIGOREGON
COMMISSION N0.388086
`MY COMMISSION 2XPIRES APR.27,2007
<��� �, ;—.
Nly commission Exuires: ' �3 �
� EXHIBIT�
NOTICE TO MORTGAGEE, LIENHOLDER,VENDOR OR SELLER:
THE TIGARD DEVELOPMENT CODE REQUIRES THAT IF YOU RECEIVE THIS NOTICE,
IT SHALL BE PROMPTLY FORWARDED TO THE PURCHASER.
CITY OF TI(3ARD
Community IneveCopment
CITY OF TIGARD S���A�etterCammunity
PUBLIC HEARING NOTICE
NOTICE IS HEREBY GIVEN THAT THE TIGARD HEARINGS OFFICER, AT A MEETING ON MONDAY,
JULY 28, 2003 AT 7:00 PM, IN THE TOWN HALL OF THE TIGARD CIVIC CENTER AT 13125 SW HALL
BOULEVARD, TIGARD, OREGON 97223 WILL CONSIDER THE FOLLOWING APPLICATION:
FILE NO.: CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT (CUP) 2003-00005
FILE TITLE: TIGARD CHURCH OF GOD EXPANSION
APPLICANT: Zaik/Miller Associates OWNER: Tigard Church of God
Attn: Jackie Root Attn: Bruce Plunkett
2340 NW Thurman Street, Suite 201 15670 SW 98th Avenue
Portland, OR 97210 Tigard, OR 97224
REQUEST: The applicant is seeking Conditional Use approval to expand the existing facility by
2,875 square feet for administrative offices and classrooms, and make site
modifications to the parking and landscaped areas.
LOCATION: 15670 SW 98�' Avenue; WCTM 2S111 CD, Tax Lot 300.
ZONE: R-7: Medium-Density Residential District. The R-7 zoning district is designed to
accommodate attached single-family homes, detached single-family homes with
or without accessory residential units, at a minimum lot size of 5,000 square feet,
and duplexes, at a minimum lot size of 10,000 square feet. Mobile home parks
and subdivisions are also permitted outright. Religious Institutions, some civic,
and institutional uses are also permitted conditionally.
APPLICABLE
REVIEW
CRITERIA: Community Development Code Chapters: 18.330, 18.360, 18.390, 18.510, 18.705,
18.725, 18.745, 18.755, 18.765, 18.780, 18.790, 18.795 and 18.810.
THE PUBLIC HEARING ON THIS MATTER WILL BE CONDUCTED IN ACCORDANCE WITH THE RULES OF
CHAPTER 18.390 OF THE COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT CODE AND RULES OF PROCEDURES ADOPTED BY
THE TIGARD CITY COUNCIL AND AVAILABLE AT CITY HALL.
ASSISTIVE LISTENING DEVICES ARE AVAILABLE FOR PERSONS WITH IMPAIRED HEARING. THE CITY WILL
ALSO ENDEAVOR TO ARRANGE FOR QUALIFIED SIGN LANGUAGE INTERPRETERS AND QUALIFIED
BILINGUAL INTERPRETERS UPON REQUEST. PLEASE CALL (503) 639-4171, EXT. 2438 (VOICE) OR (503)
684-2772 (TDD - TELECOMMUNICATIONS DEVICES FOR THE DEAF) NO LESS THAN ONE WEEK PRIOR TO
THE HEARING TO MAKE ARRANGEMENTS.
ANYONE WISHING TO PRESEN�i WRITTEN TESTIMONY ON THIS PRVrOSED ACTION MAY DO SO IN
WRITING PRIOR TO OR AT THE PUBLIC HEARING. ORAL TESTIMONY MAY BE PRESENTED AT THE PUBLIC
HEARING. AT THE PUBLIC HEARING, THE HEARINGS OFFICER WILL RECEIVE A STAFF REPORT
PRESENTATION FROM THE CITY PLANNER, OPEN THE PUBLIC HEARING, AND INVITE BOTH ORAL AND
WRITTEN TESTIMONY. THE HEARINGS OFFICER MAY CONTINUE THE PUBLIC HEARING TO ANOTHER
MEETING TO OBTAIN ADDITIONAL INFORMATION OR CLOSE THE PUBLIC HEARING AND TAKE ACTION ON
THE APPLICATION.
IF A PERSON SUBMITS EVIDENCE IN SUPPORT TO THE APPLICATION LESS THAN SEVEN (7) DAYS PRIOR
TO THE PUBLIC HEARING, ANY PARTY IS ENTITLED TO REQUEST A CONTINUANCE OF THE HEARING. IF
THERE IS NO CONTINUANCE GRANTED AT THE HEARING, ANY PARTICIPANT IN THE HEARING MAY
REQUEST THAT THE RECORD REMAIN OPEN FOR AT LEAST SEVEN (7) DAYS AFTER THE HEARING. A
REQUEST THAT THE RECORD REMAIN OPEN CAN BE MADE ONLY AT THE FIRST EVIDENTIARY HEARING
(ORS 197.763(6).
INCLUDED IN THIS NOTICE IS A LIST OF APPROVAL CRITERIA APPLICABLE TO THE REQUEST FROM THE
TIGARD COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT CODE AND THE TIGARD COMPREHENSIVE PLAN. APPROVAL OR
DISAPPROVAL OF THE REQUEST BY THE HEARINGS OFFICER WILL BE BASED UPON THESE CRITERIA AND
THESE CRITERIA ONLY. AT THE HEARING IT IS IMPORTANT THAT COMMENTS RELATING TO THE
REQUEST PERTAIN SPECIFICALLY TO THE APPLICABLE CRITERIA LISTED.
FAILURE TO RAISE AN ISSUE IN PERSON OR BY LETTER AT SOME POINT PRIOR TO THE CLOSE OF THE
HEARING ON THE REQUEST ACCOMPANIED BY STATEMENTS OR EVIDENCE SUFFICIENT TO ALLOW THE
HEARINGS AUTHORITY AN OPORTUNITY TO RESPOND TO THE ISSUE PRECLUDES AN APPEAL TO THE
LAND USE BOARD OF APPEALS BASED ON THAT ISSUE.
ALL DOCUMENTS AND APPLICABLE CRITERIA IN THE ABOVE-NOTED FILE ARE AVAILABLE FOR
INSPECTION AT NO COST OR COPIES CAN BE OBTAINED FOR TWENTY-FIVE CENTS (25�) PER PAGE, OR
THE CURRENT RATE CHARGED FOR COPIES AT THE TIME OF THE REQUEST. AT LEAST SEVEN (7) DAYS
PRIOR TO THE HEARING, A COPY OF THE STAFF REPORT WILL BE AVAILABLE FOR INSPECTION AT NO
COST, OR A COPY CAN BE OBTAINED FOR TWENTY-FIVE CENTS (25G) PER PAGE, OR THE CURRENT RATE
CHARGED FOR COPIES AT THE TIME OF THE REQUEST.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION PLEASE CONTACT THE STAFF PLANNER BRAD KILBY AT (503)
639-4171, TIGARD CITY HALL, 13125 SW HALL BOULEVARD, TIGARD, OREGON 97223, OR BY E-MAIL AT
bradley@ci.tigard.or.us.
r_� � � --.--�=° ST R �.ae........o....,e.......
YICIMITY MAP
A w �
'a 8 =__====_
� � CUP2003-00005 ,
ST , 5� —=—=__--
TIGARD CHUR�H Of
GOD EXPANSION
�
aF�e`9
DR �
LF�"
� � —_ m
� �
a?, � ,
I 7,
w -
A �
i , I \\\\ \ �, _
g � �
„
�, '
,
c \ z _.,
� � �� �� ��'
a m � n....,.. �
x ` ---
�° � \\�\\�\\ .
N
-�
1� ° �� ^
p ,.>,o�.,
�
RD c��or r�e,rd
..�.�.....
w �'.�.�.M s.�....o�.r.
V �w.�i�
.�w�e.r.�.�
Usb:,An 10. . .
2S111CA-02900 2S111CA-02000
AKAMIAN ANDREW E& BOWERMAN KATE MADELEINE EXHIBIT
AKAMIAN JANICE ORGILL 1996 15505 SW SUMMERFIELD LN
REVOCABLE TRUST-SURVIVOR'S TRUST TIGARD,OR 97224
15498 SW SUMMERFIELD LN
TIGARD,OR 97224
2S 111 CD-06200 2S 111 C D-05800
ALEXANDER DAVID R AND KARA D BOWMAN CORA H
9837 SW KIMBERLY DR 9600 SW BRENTWOOD PLACE
TIGARD,OR 97224 TIGARD,OR 97224
2S 111 CD-04100 2S 111 CD-09700
ARCHIBALD BESSIE W TR CAIRY MICHAEL L
PO BOX 146 9870 SW KIMBERLY DR
DUNDEE,OR 97115 TIGARD,OR 97224
2S 111 CD-09900 2S 111 CA-01400
ATWOOD SHERRI L COLTON RODNEY P TRUSTEE
9840 SW KIMBERLY DR 9645 SW SUMMERFIELD
TIGARD,OR 97224 TIGARD,OR 97224
2S 111 CD-07300 2S 111 CD-09100
BALL BARBARA R TRUST COMBS MICHAEL G AND CYNTHIA A
15740 SW SERENA CT 15890 SW SERENA CT
TIGARD,OR 97224 TIGARD,OR 97224
2S 111 DC-04500 25111 CA-01000
BARTSCH RICHARD D&WYONA R TRS CORP OF PRESIDING BISHOP OF
9440 SW SUMMERFIELD DR CHURCH OF JESUS CHRIST LDS
TIGARD,OR 97224 50 E NORTH TEMPLE#511-4705
SALT LAKE CITY,UT 84150
2S 171 DC-05100 2S 111 DC-04200
BATES LA MAE L&FRANK E COTE'OLIVER PAUL&VIRGINIA B
15683 SW SUMMERFIELD LN 15635 SW ALDERBROOK DR
TIGARD,OR 97224 TIGARD,OR 97224
2S 171 CD-04300 25117 CDA6800
BIRNEY MAUD M TRUSTEE CRANE GUY R&DONNA K
9520 SW BRENTWOOD PL 9885 SW KIMBERLY DR
TIGARD,OR 97224 TIGARD,OR 97224
2S 171 CD-03300 2S 111 CD-1�500
BLUMENFELD ROBERT C& DIRKSEN CRAIG E&JACKIE
KATHRYN K 15775 SW 98TH AVE
9625 SW BRENTWOOD PL TIGARD,OR 97224
TIGARD,OR 97224
2S 111 CD-09600 2S 711 CD-06400
BOSTWICK PHILIP D/LAURIE A DORSETT ERNEST L I MARLENE
9890 SW KIMBERLY DR 9841 SW KIMBERLY DR
TIGARD,OR 97224 TIGARD,OR 97224
zsi�i c�-os�oo 2S111 CD-0270�
DUFFY GARY H AND ERAINA J HANLON GERTRUDE TRUSTEE
9855 SW KIMBERLY 15600 SW 98TH AVE
TIGARD,OR 97223 TIGARD,OR 97224
2S 111 CD-04700 2S 111 CD-10700
DUNLAP GERALD M&REBA L HANSEN ROBERT M
15980 SW BRENTWOOD CT 15802 SW 98TH AVE
TIGARD,OR 97224 TIGARD,OR 97224
2S111 DC-04900 2S111 CD-03500
DUNLAP WILLIAM J&MARIAN HARDY JEANNE L
15657 SW SUMMERFIELD LN 9605 SW BRENTWOOD PL
TIGARD,OR 97224 TIGARD,OR 97224
25111 CA-03000 2S 111 CD-01200
FIRST INTERSTATE BANK HASS PHYLLIS W
C/O ICG 9500 SW SUMMERFIELD DRIVE
PO BOX 810490 TIGARD,OR 97224
DALLAS,TX 75381
2S111CD-09500 2S111CA-03100
FORBES ROGER M&PATRICIA A HOFFMAN DONALD E&SUSAN T
9894 SW KIMBERLY DR 9485 SW SUMMERFIELD DR
TIGARD,OR 97224 TIGARD,OR 97224
2S 111 CD-0O600 2S 111 CD-06500
FRISON ELIZABETH HOLMAN PAUL D&RHONDA G
15905 SW 98TH AVE 9843 SW KIMBERLY DR
TIGARD,OR 97224 TIGARD,OR 97224
2S 111 DC-04700 25111 CD-01600
GARD J ALLAN& HUNTER KIM C
MARGARET H 15634 SW SUMMERFIELD LN
15648 SW SUMMERFIELD PL TIGARD,OR 97224
TIGARD,OR 97223
2S 111 CD-07000 2S 111 CD-06300
GODDARD JAMES A AND ISRAEL WAYNE S/THERESA A
JANET B 9839 SW KIMBERLY DR
15790 SW SERENA CT TIGARD,OR 97224
TIGARD,OR 97223
2S111 CD-05500 2S111 CD-01800
GRAHAM JOHN M&LUCILLE H TRS IVERSON MAURICE S
9570 SW BRENTWOOD PL 15625 SW SUMMERFIELD LN
TIGARD,OR 97224 TIGARD,OR 97224
25111 CA-01600 2S 117 CD-01500
GRUGGEN ROBERT C 8 KIRSTEN TRS JENKINS LOUIS C TR
9585 SW SUMMERFIELD DR 15618 5W SUMMERFIELD LN
TIGARD,OR 97224 TIGARD,OR 97224
2S 111 CD-03700 2S 171 CD-04400
JIROCH CATHRYN M KYES STEPHEN G
9575 SW BRENTWOOD PL 9530 SW BRENTWOOD PL
TIGARD,OR 97223 TIGARD,OR 97224
2S 111 CA-01700 2S 111 CD-05300
JOHNSON RAY A/BEVERLY J TRUST LANGE ARTHUR K&
BY RAY AlBEVERLY J JOHNSON TRS LYNN JEAN M
PO BOX 462 15955 SW BRENTWOOD CT
SEASIDE,OR 97138 TIGARD,OR 97224
2S 111 CD-072b0 2S 1 t 1 CD-06900
JOHNSON ROGER L 8 DONNA A LEATHERWOOD SUSAN R 8
15760 SW SERENA CT OMID CYRUS
TIGARD,OR 97224 9895 SW KIMBERLY DR
TIGARD,OR 97224
2S 111 CD-02900 2S 117 CD-10100
JOHNSON VERN D/NADINE L TRS LEISTRA RONALD M&ALDINE
15620 SW 98TH AVE 9815 SW KIMBERLY
TIGARD,OR 97224 TIGARD,OR 97223
2S 111 CD-04000 2S 111 CD-02400
KNIGHT BETTY M L HAN CHARD M&
9545 SW BRENTWOOD PL KAT A
TIGARD,OR 97224 UNIT 0
AP
, 0
2S 111 DC-06200 2S 111 CA-01900
KOENIG REVOCABLE TRUST LETT GLENN F&RUTH T
BY JUANITA KOENIG& 15521 SW SUMMERFIELD LN
KAKROLYN NEUPERT TRS TIGARD,OR 97224
9495 SW BRENTWOOD PL
TIGARD,OR 97224
2S 111 CD-05600 2S 111 CD-03800
KOEPKE WARREN C 8 WINNIE LINK JOHN M
9580 SW BRENTWOOD PL 9565 SW BRENTWOOD PL
TIGARD,OR 97224 TIGARD,OR 97224
2S 111 CD-10600 2S 111 CA-01500
KROUTH DENNIS A LUTHERN CHURCH-MISSOURI SYNOD FD
15795 SW 98TH AVE c/o SLEIGHT ALBERT&MARIE R
TIGARD,OR 97224 LIFE ESTATE
1333 S KIRKWOOD RD
ST LOUIS,MO 63122
2S 111 DC-04600 2S 111 CD-08800
KUHN JAMES R TR& MANZANO PHILIP A AND GERALDINE
ROBINSON SHIRLEY T TR 15920 SW SERENA CT
9470 SW SUMMERFIELD DR TIGARD,OR 97224
TIGARD,OR 97224
2S 111 CD-10200 2S 111 CD-10D00
KUIPERS MARY E MCCOY JAMES L&IRENE N TRS
9820 SW KIMBERLY DR 9825 SW KIMBERLY DR
TIGARD,OR 97224 TIGARD,OR 97224
2S 111 CD-04500 2S 111 CD-04900
MCDOUGALL JAMES R&MONICA M NUTTER JUDITH A&
9540 SW BRENTWOOD PLACE QUINN DORIS G
TIGARD,OR 97224 15995 SW BRENTWOOD CT
TIGARD,OR 97224
2S 111 CD-04200 2S 111 CD-D 1300
MCKEAN ROBERT C&LORA M PALM BYRON S AND JANE M
9510 SW BRENTWOOD PLACE 15574 SW SUMMERFIELD LN
TIGARD,OR 97224 TIGARD,OR 97224
2S 111 CD-04800 2S 711 CD-06000
MILES PAUL M&PERLA V PARCELL JOHN T&JOLENE C
15990 SW BRENTWOOD CT 9620 SW BRENTWOOD PL
TIGARD,OR 97224 TIGARD,OR 97224
2S 111 CD-09200 2S 111 CD-10400
MILLER ROBERT A&LINDA C PELZNER KAY PAULINE
15880 SW SERENA WAY CT 15755 5W 98TH AVE
TIGARD,OR 97224 TIGARD,OR 97224
2S 111 CD-02200 2S 111 CD-05900
MINER DAVID A 8 NEDRA SUE PERRINE CAROLINE W TR
9560 SW SUMMERFIELD DR 9610 SW BRENTWOOD PLACE
TIGARD,OR 97224 TIGARD,OR 97224
2s���co-os�oo zs�i i c�-os�oo
MOORE BRIAN J/DONNA L PETERS ALICE E
9835 SW KIMBERLY DRIVE 9590 SW BRENTWOOD PL
TIGARD,OR 97224 TIGARD,OR 97224
2S 111 CD-02500 2S 111 CD-01700
MOORE FAMILY TRUST PETERSEN MELVIN C
BY TRUSTEE OF MOORE FAMILY TRUST 15641 SW SUMMERFIELD LN
9660 SW SUMMERFIELD DR TIGARD,OR 97224
TIGARD,OR 97224
2S 711 DC-04000 2S 111 CD-04600
MOORE THOMAS JEWETT&D C PETERSON GLENN L&KATHERINE E
15665 SW ALDERBROOK DR 15970 SW BRENTWOOD CT
TIGARD,OR 97224 TIGARD,OR 97224
2S 111 CD-05200 2S 7 71 DC-06400
NELSON BARBARA J PETERSON WILLIAM D&VERNA K TR
15965 SW BRENTWOOD CT 9515 SW BRENTWOOD PL
TIGARD,OR 97223 TIGARD,OR 97224
2S 111 DC-05000 2S 111 CD-09800
NELSON GARY 8 PETRINA JACK M&FRANCES M
SANDRA M 9860 SW KIMBERLY DR
15671 SUMMERFIELD LN TIGARD,OR 97224
TIGARD,OR 97224
2S 111 CD-07100 2S 171 CD-09300
PIERCE HAROLD D&MARILYN K RUZICKA DIANE L
PO BOX 2316 9900 SW KIMBERLY DR
LAKE OSWEGO,OR 97035 TIGARD,OR 97223
2S111 DC-04800 2S111 CD-03400
POTTER DONALD H 8�MARY SAVAGE ARDETH M
15666 SW SUMMERFIELD LN 9615 SW BRENTWOOD PL
TIGARD,OR 97224 TIGARD,OR 97224
2S111 DC-04100 2S111 DC-06100
RADEL JOSEPH R SCHULTZ ELAINE M
15655 SW ALDERBROOK DR 9485 SW BRENTWOOD PL
TIGARD,OR 97224 TIGARD,OR 97224
2S 111 CD-03900 2S 111 CD-02800
REED KATHERINE E TR SCHUMACKER BONNIE J TRUSTEE
BY KATHERINE E REED TR 15610 SW 98TH AVE
9555 SW BRENTWOOD PL TIGARD,OR 97224
TIGARD,OR 97224
2S 111 CD-06600 2S 111 CD-05100
REED MICHAEL T SEITZINGER PEGGY E
9847 SW KIMBERLY DR 15975 SW BRENTWOOD CT
TIGARD,OR 97224 TIGARD,OR 97224
2S 1'I 1 CD-09400 2S 111 CD-03200
RENSKLEV ELLEN M SINNARD GERALDINE
9898 SW KIMBERLY DR 9635 SW BRENTWOOD PL
TIGARD,OR 97224 TIGARD,OR 97224
2S 111 CD-09000 2S 111 CD-00500
RICHARDSON LYNNE L& SOLIS GUSTAVO&CAROL
RICHARDSON JEAN E 9835 SW DURHAM RD
15900 SW SERENA CT TIGARD,OR 97224
TIGARD,OR 97224
2S 111 CD-O5000 2S 111 CD-00400
RIEDER T H&M FRANCINE SOUTHWEST CHURCH OF
15985 SW BRENTWOOD CT CHRIST
TIGARD,OR 97224 9725 SW DURHAM ROAD
TIGARD,OR 97223
2S 111 CA-01800 2S 111 CD-02300
RITCHEY CALVIN J& SPENCER BARBARA A TRUST
MAYDORIS A TRUSTEES 9600 SW SUMMERFIELD DR
15537 SW SUMMERFIELD LN TIGARD,OR 97224
TIGARD,OR 97224
2S 111 CD-02'100 2S 111 CD-03000
ROSSMAN DALE V AND STOUT BARBARA L CO-TRUSTEE&
MARJORIE F DOOLING CAROL S CO-TRUSTEE
15581 SW SUMMERFIELD LN 15630 SW 98TH
TIGARD,OR 97224 TIGARD,OR 97224
•25111 DC-06300 2S 111 CD-03100
SULLIVAN ROBERT D AND TODD MARIAN F
KATHERINE J MAYOR MAURI
9505 SW BRENTWOOD PLACE 9645 SW BRENTWOOD PL
TIGARD,OR 97224 TIGARD,OR 97224
111 CD-01000 2S 7 71 CD-01400
S ERFIELD NO 4 TOPOLSKI CHARLES F
OW F ALL LOTS 15606 SW SUMMERFIELD LN
, TIGARD,OR 97224
2 111 CD-011 2S 111 CD-08900
SU IELD NO 4 TOWLE JANET•C
OW S LL LOTS 15910 SW SERENA CT
TIGARD,OR 97224
2 �11 CA-01 25111 CD-03600 ,
SU E ELD NO 7 ULWELLING JOHN J&KATHLEEN M
OWN OF ALL LOTS PO BOX 230781
TIGARD,OR 97281
2 111 CD-02 2S111 DC-06500
SU E ELD NO 7 WATKINS PARKER D JR
OWN F ALL LOTS 9480 SW BRENTWOOD PL
TIGARD,OR 97224
S111DC-15 2S117CD-70300
S ME ELD NO 7 WEGENER BRIAN AND
OWN OF ALL LOTS KAREN BULLARD
9830 SW KIMBERLY
TIGARD,OR 97223
2S 111 CD-05400 2S 17 7 CD-01900
TAYLOR JAMES B& WILEY RICHARD H&LOIS W TRUSTE
E JUANITA TRUSTEES 15613 SW SUMMERFIELD LN
15945 5W BRENTWOOD CT PORTLAND,OR 97224
TIGARD,OR 97224
2S111DC-05200 ZAIK/MILLER ASSOCIATES
THIELKE JAMES W&LUANNE D
15691 SW SUMMERFIELD LN ATTN: �ACK I E ROOT
TIGARD,OR 97224 Z34O NW THURMAN STREET. SUITE ZOI
PORTLAND. OR 97210
2S 111 CD-00300
TIGARD CHURCH OF GOD T I GARD CHURCH 0� GOD
15670 5W 98TH AVENUE ATTN; BRUCE PLUNKETT
TIGARD,OR 97223 15670 SW 98TH AvENUE
TIGARD, OR 97224
2S117CD-02000
TILLMAN JOHN 8 BONNIE J
15597 SW SUMMERFIELD LN
TIGARD,OR 97224
. ,
Jack Biethan Josh Thomas
11023 SW Summerfield Drive, #4 10395 SW Bonanza
Tigard, OR 97224 Tigartl, OR 97224
Kristen Miller
8940 SW Edgewood Street
Tigard, OR 97223
Paul Owen
10335 SW Highland Drive
Tigard, OR 97224
Louise Fronville
15760 SW Oak Meadow Lane
Tigard, OR 97224
Tim Esau
PO Box 230695
Tigard, OR 97281
Nathan and Ann Murdock
PO Box 231265
Tigard, OR 97281
Ross Sundberg
16382 SW 104th Avenue
Tigard, OR 97224
Brian Wegener
9830 SW Kimberly Drive
Tigard, OR 97224
J. Dyar
10430 SW Century Oak Drive
Tigard, OR 97224
Rex Caffall
13205 SW Village Glenn
Tigard, OR 97223
CITY OF TIGARD - SOUTH CIT SUBfOMMITfEE (pg. I of I) (i:lcurpinlsetup\IabeIsICIT 5outh.doc) UPDATED: November 27, 2002
- �� �
,� _ ��-�-�_ .�� '��r..f� ,�� t� f,� � ('�' _t•�
=��-'��� ���=� U�� r
GI�L—� u��r�L,r L� .�c=— m
�f�GC �20�'0��� j� i �L�
1���o,�cJ .�-s �i��-��- ,,�,, �y
! �2/ l��1J c'��v �cr„¢��s
�i/�'�--t �/.2%�,�'z— `-,c-� c��- /�/�E?G�r.� w /� LL��e� �,..�
�-T7 c yc� �� CT�Y
�'-�—� v/3z��K� f�i'f'I c� /t? C�G�
� /'� �'C-c>l7�=__r� � � �
(..v�9-y sc c-� G✓ �'��j� (.�/Lc�(c � 7�0 ��;�c�
� /��//?.i�. �. � �� BC �t.c� vt.�r uc.t1'1
/�-u��r�-r���-�} ,�r-� � y � a-� f
' �� ��P za�� -��
����� �
�� � �—o �_=�r���-�� _ �'I��S �' ��l�e �►�-�5��
!S �v � �> �
����/°^t�__°� � ��q/e�� �A�� �1� `�'��'�,—�`(�.
�V YV/V+�/ /!w� �
j�� O L.G�v i---�J �-�'/2--%=:/-'-<"�� � J
�}s S�i.o�nl i vt ��%a��,�i���
��'z-' /'1/d - ��' T� //��-� �'.�.��r��
Pl� .
�_�<,�-� - r �,� �L�
/2�-=/�1 L� /� L�� 7`7�— /�c', . �'� i�
C�1 � G� - ��
�GGL�S � �� ��-� � �C�f�
�f,��/LtrD- G� ��_ ����� ..,
����-z�r�
�sr� �� v.�.��a��,�
�` LZ L � �'p3 ._�G y —.3 �0 3
• 1� / /,C.IV $ � � ` \ Jo !"• �� . . - N `"' ' -- N I _I-.
, - w
°p � \ w y o�,3�•f; " �� CUR ENT SAN/TARY 39 '
N
p" f.� ` VAULT ti o58"F. 22� � N
, SE R L/NE/ �
i
\ ,,., 225 ; 22 � N£W
` h C(/RB CUT £S
� ti °'� 2` ' A
� � h a; �, e ^ , __i , •.x�.; _...i /S
a ;,c> > . ,5'• "� .
� W �\\ � MOb N N RVB' ,L'�' 1,,t£,: ..' , ., h
� AWN/NG L/NF.
h �RE � �� y�^�. N.
� �v - L}�� _ ,• ,..,t£1PRA'�'� �' £EN CCESS/BL£ N
c _-- — `� --�--- �t? -�--- - '� �', CR A
., � � — ____ -- ,�... I =__.�-�� �.. RE'MO � � �, '��� '. , PARKING S GN + -
� � ��� °"Nr, �, N �54"F/R � � '��� ` .'' /NG
Z � �'�-L` �o R£M�I�E EX/ NG '• REM £ £X�ST
I R/S£!T ' � O RA/N ��£LOC A T£ R IC A T/O N �� r 3' W/D E H£O G M£T A P O S T 53
v � (WATER)� N � 42 ,
� — iRELOCAT£ A.� CONTROL �t rE AS / �--- -- � ______
— — �P£4U/R£D R£4UlRf0 � /0 .�-HANO/CAP
,.'r~ 7B C ,�ti1• t� ; NEw ���Nrs�RA r R£A�OVE £X/ST/NC _ _ s!CC£SS L£ PARK/NG SPAC£
`�'�' ��-,` a I t�,.,� � � BU�L D/�'G CO CRET£ W,4LK pARK/N S/GN --
'•`• �,� 3 t H, •,, � p , �78 88 � '.'`••�; :G Rr� �IT.; ti�' ti�' qC ES
��,' B/KE RACK - 8 SPAGfS � / F/N. f L �R ` �ti ti
, � i '''� �s N£W
'++•, � NfW � ��' ..�,.' • R£,t/OVE EXIST/NG AND I• h
� STEPS �S/UE ysILK CURB CUT
PAD �� R£T..
C
C. / ON /
'c N C i' .. .
CO
W . .
--��--'-
v' . ''r.•',
� �'' � � " H ND/CAP
.. ,,.,.... � _ � �
6 � �CONT OL /RkiLAT/ON �„��,' �
1::.��:'7.. � . MU
. '2..:,:;`;��;.� 8� �/ R£4U/REO V�;/AS pLANT/NG �TR/P - _ �� CCESS/BL£
2.• tiZ f _ , , w.., .• •� • :'• , ' 4•,-•ES PARK/NG S/GN
I � Yr � �M.�: i .T} �+.�.Y :. +'i \. . f..:r' • ♦+ .
CHURCH ��� � `� ..�..:.r. .. � . �NEw 4p
E'X/Si/N�' ' � ��`�� -
-r ;, �CC£�S/BL£ RA CONC. S/D£W4L 43
M.t/.W. y I' • ' AC,C£S ��L� RA„� ��OP£ 1:t2
� �, �. .' SL�O % Z �
� F/NISHED FL OOR ___ I j ' �``�' " . 2 R/S£RS �
�� ; , �,.�� � 5�
t^ I 227 � 2fi�/'
�-, - 218.91 £i EVATION = 218.88
E�£�,4TJON - (�u HARD fL00R) �
i
� (�N CARPET) I t 1` ' � �/�r , , �
� I � � 2 ��1' � ryryy. £WA�.K �/ � ^• .. . '°' C '�, � ��
� ' ' � �2 5 ,j�r , �;�+ .
I ! � , 1 - 5
� � �i ti ;.. 1 � _ .-----
1� I ' £X/ST/M1; . .�. ' ';�'� "� -
ti�' I I � S/D£µdL . � A' " ' ,
NOT£. FOi�' LAIb'DSCAPI� ;. � '
I '
M�:w. � � ' � , ��E R£FE�A�' . ,� - l ^ .
ELEC. ao,r 1 '" � AND L RA/N,� . ,.. �
�.�, I `� • j r '
�`: l£t£c. Bo.•r � � ^ � `�� � TD C/f/L A.�ID LA��IDS V��f� .. � j�::
�, � o �;!� ,°LANS
i�: -�_,���-�: BOX ry N I h �'�' 1� '��,� �' �' • � _ _--- --
I N ` \/
����. I � eL.. + .�_ I .• ..— . . ..
? ' I Q I �f .__ '_'._" . . .. . ..
M.V.W. �� I 4+_ .._
',`�''� cl`' � Ml..P.
� _ _ .- - 12 ,. . .2 6 � .
I � .
� O
_ ___ � � v
� , �_�
I N --I �p1 � 'h°' 1 -
"+ .�.---M.�!W. ^�°� �: ;
�
+ � tiry�' `; ti�y titih� TIGAr�
, W � DIVISIO`
� V �
� CONCRETE L4ND/NG � ���
Z �''a � _
b � � STEPS NjMNI�'S 225 _.—
� ;
�. � 3 i�s, � - ; h £XI_TU'G �r
" �I a� ..� ' �`� i� H CUFi'9 C!/1 5
�I � �, 'A � �� �,'� I �' p'� �
�� °•' :� � �� ,�^,+ � � UNO C �-y-�� ^ �, ��
m � ,�'? � N-�;:-.%�:;; � f � ti�' f l ����' �" � �/�'-f_� - '1.�
e• �ry °�.:.•,.,•.'���' �`�� t _�..�-----------J' __---`—' - G°'��' ` �
`' ��— .—rJ :�'..•�:' ::�° _ � -- — --.._�-,��"�pJSS/6LE � -'•�� _ —
,c --- .�r ...- tr�4'N/NG % UT ..._ ,__ __--.�..:_- —
�:. ;.�,:-� �.��' W/DE � �.__ �.�,�.���:4��� CCNCR�-T£ CURB . � v 10(
,, �-
� r, n ^ :�7 .�w'f.}��.�_ —���- \• � �' _ G _
�r . • , �
•, � PRE,APP.HE1D BY:
CITY OF TIGARD PLANNING DIVISION �
� 13125 SW HALL BOULEVARD TIGARD, OR 97223-8189
503.639.4171 l503.684.7297
CITY OF TIGARD
OREGON LAND USE PERMIT APPLICATION
File# ' "ot o0 3-pp0�� Other Case # �R � a uv 3 " Vu�7�2 3
Date 5"IS - v 3 gy �.�".1 e s Receipt# �� � �9�`� City 0 Urb ❑ Date Complete �� �' 1 t
TYPE OF PERMIT YOU ARE APPLYING FOR
❑ AdjustmenWariance (I or II) ❑ Minor Land Partition (II) ❑ Zone Change (III) �
�
❑ Comprehensive Plan Amendment (IV) ❑ Planned Development (III) ❑ Zone Change Annexation (IV)
�Conditional Use (III) ❑ Sensitive Lands Review (I, II or III) ❑Zone Ordinance Amendment (IV)
❑ Historic Overlay(II or III) ❑ Site Development Review (II)
❑ Home Occupation (II) ❑ Subdivision (II or III)
ress i avai a e
TI eAKt� CNu� QF bdD 15�o�D 5u1 Q8T" Rv�n1UE T1�IzD o � 91ZZ�
i ! Gn 300
2��7' x y0o r = I! D D�D 5� �-7 /N�fUM �7E1�!?l� lZ�S�t�EN7���
JAGK IE �2oDT J I M M�c!-�2 � 1A
Z�IK MIU,�le A5`�xlAT�S 23ya tilu� THU�cMAU 5U7E Zol PoleTc.�n ok 9�2�0
5D3. 222 . ql� 503. 222. !�{fo0
J�uc�� 1ZooT 503. �22 . R!58
ac is i more an one
Tr��i�D CHu�ecX 0� l�at� - uc� �v�ir.�TT - o NFa2`3 �P �trlv�
1 sb�0 5w 9B� s4v�NV� ?�b,a� o� 9��z�{
503 -1�3�-y000 503 - �39- �g35
*When the owner and the applicant are different people, the applicant must be purchaser of record or a lessee in
possession with written authorization from the owner or an agent of the owner. The�ners must sign this application in the
s ace rovided on the back of this form or submit a written authorization with this ap lication.
ease e speci ic
T
APPLICATIONS WILL NOT BE ACCEPTED WITHOUT ALL OF THE REQUIRED SUBMITTAL ELEMENTS AS
DESCRIBED IN THE "BASIC SUBMITTAL REQUIREMENTS" INFORMATION SHEET.
. .- � - � r.'
.. ,.
r
THE APPLICANT SHALL CERTIFY THAT:
♦ If the application is granted, the applicant shall exercise the rights granted in accordance with the
terms and subject to all the conditions and limitations of the approval.
♦ All the above statements and the statements in the plot plan, attachments, and exhibits
transmitted herewith, are true; and the applicants so acknowledge that any permit issued, based
on this application, map be revoked if it is found that any such statements are false.
♦ The applicant has read the entire contents of the application, including the policies and criteria,
and understands the requirements for approving or denying the application(s).
SIGNATURES OF EACH OWNER OF THE SUBJECT PROPERTY ARE REQUIRED.
�
`�' ' ��� L' �%��� c.s � � S�
� ' � -
O er's Signature Date
Owner's Signature Date
Owner's Signature Date
Owner's Signature Date
Owner's Signature Date
ApplicantlAgent/Representative's Signature Date
ApplicantlAgent/Representative's Signature Date
CITY OF TIOARD
Community�DeveCopment
S�api�tgA Better Community
LAND USE PROPOSAL DESCRIPTION
120 DAYS = 10/4/2003
FILE NO.: CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT (CUP) 2003-00005
FILE TITLE: TIGARD CHURCH OF GOD EXPANSION
APPLICANT: Zaik/Miller Associates OWNER: Tigard Church of God
Attn: Jackie Root Attn: Bruce Plunkett
2340 NW Thurman Street, Suite 201 15670 SW 98th Avenue
Portland, OR 97210 Tigard, OR 97224
REQUEST: The applicant is seeking Conditional Use approval to expand the existing facility by
2,875 square feet for administrative offices and classrooms, and make site
modifications to the parking and landscaped areas.
LOCATION: 15670 SW 98�' Avenue; WCTM 2S111CD, Tax Lot 300.
ZONE: R-7: Medium-Density Residential District. The R-7 zoning district is designed to
accommodate attached single-family homes, detached single-family homes with or
without accessory residential units, at a minimum lot size of 5,000 square feet, and
duplexes, at a minimum lot size of 10,000 square feet. Mobile home parks and
subdivisions are also permitted outright. Religious Institutions, some civic, and
institutional uses are also permitted conditionally.
APPLICABLE
REVIEW
CRITERIA: Community Development Code Chapters: 18.330, 18.360, 18.390, 18.510, 18.705,
18.725, 18.745, 18.755, 18.765, 18.780, 18.790, 18.795 and 18.810.
CIT AREA: South
DECISION MAKING BODY BELOW: ❑ TYPE I ❑ TYPE II � TYPE III ❑ TYPE IV
DATE COMMENTS WERE SENT: JUNE 11, 2003 DATE COMMENTS ARE DUE: JUNE 25, 2003
�HEARINGS OFFICER (MON.) DATE OF HEARING: JULY 28, 2003 TIME: 7:00 PM
❑PLANNING COMMISSION (MON.) DATE OF HEARING: TIME: 7:00 PM
❑CITY COUNCIL (TUES.) DATE OF HEARING: TIME: 7:30 PM
❑STAFF DECISION (TENTATIVE) DATE OF DECISION:
COMPONENTS RELATED TO THE PROJECT AVAILABLE FOR VIEWING IN THE PLANNING DIVISION
VICINITY MAP ❑ LANDSCAPING PLAN ❑ TOPOGRAPHIC SURVEY
� SITE PLAN ❑ TRAFFIC IMPACT STUDY � IMPACT STUDY
� NARRATIVE ❑ STORM H20 CALCS. � OTHER:MISC.
STAFF CONTACT: Brad Kilby, Associate Planner (503) 639-4171, extension 2434
May 30, 2003 ,,,,,;
Zaik/Miller Associates �+�TM �F T�G'��
Attn: Jackie Root OREGON
2340 NW Thurman, Suite 201
Portland, OR 97210
RE: Tigard Church of God Expansion (CUP2003-00005)
Dear Jackie:
The City of Tigard received your application submittal for a Conditional Use
Permit on May 14, 2003. The development site is located at 2S111CD, Tax Lot
00300. This letter is to inform you that additional materials will be needed in order
to deem your application complete. The necessary materials are as follows:
• A tree plan prepared by a certified arborist in compliance with Tigard
Development Code section 18.790.030. The plan should speak to tree
removal, any potential impacts to those trees that are to be retained on
site, and a protection plan to avoid impacts during construction. While I
realize that you have had a landscape architect review these, issues, the
plan is required to be provided by a certified arborist. Your landscape
architect may prepare the plan, but a certified arborist must review and
approve it.
• The City's Development Review Engineer needs the items on the
enclosed public facility plan completeness checklist. If you have questions
regarding the information, contact Brian Rager at (503)639-4171 ext.2471
Once you are prepared to submit the information, I will need 14 copies for
routing. Should you have any questions with regard to these items, please
contact me at 503-639-4171 ext. 2434.
Sincerely,
,/`l�v� s�"--t.L:(�il
� �
Brad Kilby
Associate Planner
c: CUP2003-00005 Land Use File
13125 SW Hall Blvd., Tigard, OR 97223 (503)639-4171 TDD(503)684-2772
l_�P ollJllJ�'lNl/lJ�/ //�Cl1p�C�ia2�, Of ljQ�] ,
� ND USE APPLIC�'ION D teeCt�j 3��
LA ��
COMPLETENESS REVIEW L�'COMPLETE [V]�INCOMPLETE
T NDARD INFOR ATION:
Deed/Title/Proof Of Ownership � Neighbarhood Mtg. Affidavits, Minutes, list O(Attendees [� Impaa Study (18.390)
[� USA Service Provider Letter ❑ (onstruccion Cost Estimate ❑ # Sets Of Application Materials/Plans
[�Pre-Application fonference Notes [� Envelopes With Postage (Verify fount)
►z�.
p�JECT STATISTICS:
[���Building Faotprint Size % Of Landscaping On Site �% Of Building Impervious Surface On Site
[,�/ Lot Square Footage
LA DIMEN IONED:
�uilding Footprint Q/ Parking Space Dimensions(Include Accessible&Bike Parking) rl Tr�rk I oadin�nace__W�rsa-A�aal+fs6le
uilding Height �Access Approach And Aisle ❑ Yisual flearance Triangle Shown
ADDITIONAL PLANS:
❑ Vianity Map [� Architectural Plan [� Tree Inventory '
[�Existing Conditions Plan [� landscape Plan _
[�Site Plan [,� Lighting Plan �--
TREE PLAN/MITIGATION PLAN:
❑ � -
ADDITIONAL REPORTS: (list any special reports)
❑ �
o a
❑ o
E BLE CODE SECTIONS:
I 8.330�ca,a�o��u�� ❑ 18.620�r�a T���o��s�a�� 1 I 8.765(oH-sveet Puwngnwding�eyuiameou)
❑ I 8.340�a�mr:na�Rtio�� ❑ 18.630(w�ni��sqoue k�o��li��� ❑ I 8.775�o��k�,�
❑ I8.350(Pl�nnee uevdopmeo� [I�I8.T05(Acass/Egress/oral�oon) � 18.1SO(iigns)
� �a.360(Site Derebpment kriew) ❑ I 8.�I O(Accessory ksidmU�l Uniu) ❑ 8.�85(femponry Use Permits)
❑ 18.370(v���«:/r+d��sv��n► ❑ I 8.l I 5(u��q c��aoo�� tQ�6.790(�ree k�
❑ I B.38O(Ioning Mip/fext Amendmeno) ❑ �8.�20(�esign[omp�GbiGq Stnduds) �a.�95(Yuu�l Ckuma Areu)
�� .3�5(Mixellmeas PermitsJ �I E.TZS(EnrironmenGl Per(ornunce Shnduds) ❑ I H.�97(Witer Aesarces(WR)Overiry Distria)
.390(Dedsion M�king Procedurts/Impxt Smdy) ❑ I E.�3O(Ezttpoons To Devebpment Shnduds) ❑ , (8.795�rekss Camwnivuon huliues)
❑ I 8.410 p.ot��e�ej�sonenn) ❑ I 8.140�+�c��o��r� � I H.B I O(fueet i UOGry Improrement Sonduds)
� �$.4�Q(lmd PutiUOns) ❑ 8.142(�ome ocap�uon Permo�
❑ .430(Sube�sions) (]✓�I 8.745(l�ndsaping&Saeening Shnduds)
• I S.S I O(MsidenG�l ioning Districu) ❑ IB.7SO(M�nu(icwrtd/Mobil Harne kgu�6ans)
❑ I 8.520(comme�1o�ioq o�uKU) [�I 8.155�nixed Sdid Wute/ItecTding Smnge)
� I 8.S3O(Industri�l loning Disvicb) ❑ I 8.160(No�con�o�og s�m�oau)
ADDITIONAL ITEMS:
I:�curpin�masterslrevisedUand use application completeness review.dot REVISED: 17-Jan-01
PUBLIC FACILITYPLAN Projecf: ,Tgard Church of God
COMPLETENESS CHECKLIST Dafe: May 22, 2003
GRADING
� Existing and proposed contours shown.
� Are there grading impacts on adjacent parcels?
� Adjacent parcel grades shown.
❑ Geotech study submitted? n/a
STREETISSUES
❑ Right-of-way clearly shown. Nof clearly shown. Does not match what we
see on the tax assessor maps.
❑ Centerline of street(s) clearly shown. Nof clearly shown.
� Street name(s) shown.
� Existing/proposed curb or edge of pavement shown.
❑ Street profiles shown. n/a
❑ Future Street Plan: Must show street profiles, topo n/a
on adjacent parcel(s), etc.
❑ Traffic Impact and/or Access Report n/a
� Street grades compliant?
❑ StreeUROW widths dimensioned and appropriate? Not dimensioned, which adds to fhe conflict
between fhe p/an and the tax maps.
❑ Private Streets? Less than 6 lots and width
appropriate?
❑ Other:
SANITARY SEWER ISSUES
� Existing/proposed lines shown.
❑ Stubs to adjacent parcels required/shown?
WATER ISSUES
� Existing/proposed lines w/sizes noted?
� Existing/proposed fire hydrants shown?
� Proposed meter location and size shown?
� Proposed fire protection system shown?
STORM DRAINAGE AND WATER QUALITY ISSUES
� Existing/proposed lines shown?
❑ Preliminary sizing calcs for water quality/detention Not provided.
provided?
� Water quality/detention facility shown on plans?
❑ Area for facility match requirements from calcs?
� Facility shown outside any wetland buffer?
� Storm stubs to adjacent parcels required/shown?
The submittal is her deeme � COMP ETE � INCOMPLETE
� `. `
By: �; Date: May 22, 2003
REVISED: 05/22/03 `t(/ '17 �(\ �� � `. ^' I � , 1 y n� �'� , �I .��
S` � � �`\ `_{ � J
� � �
June 9, 2003
{. _
Zaik/Miller Associates C�TM �F T�G��
Attn: Jackie Root OREGON
2340 NW Thurman, Suite 201
Portland, OR 97210
RE: Tigard Church of God Expansion (CUP2003-00005)
Dear Jackie:
The City of Tigard received your application submittal for a Conditional Use
Permit on May 14, 2003, and the additional items requested on June 6, 2003.
The development site is located at 2S111 CD, Tax Lot 00300. This letter is to
inform you that the application has been deemed complete and has been
scheduled for review. Depending upon the Hearing's Officer's schedule, I have
tentatively set a hearing date of July 28, 2003.
Should you have any questions with regard to these items, please contact me at
503-639-4171 ext. 2434.
Sinc ely,
!� .
Brad Kilby
Associate Planner
c: CUP2003-00005 Land Use File
13125 SW Hall Blvd., Tigard, OR 97223 (503)639-4171 TDD (503)684-2772
__ -,_. ' _..._--_._..._.",_:..r_._.��------��
. �'�'------_
- �_-M�'�'-
. "�'�_---�--...
STATE OF OREGON, � 3�,.`�,�, �
! Counfy of.._��� ss.
before me a �
. .__. ------- - -- ----•---•--_..On this--- ----- -----
; PPeared-- --•R�X..M czc��..el----------�- ----------daY of--------.k]ay-------------•---�, 19_.7.1.,
, _Janice__Petersen �--.-._________
� - -
--�-----•- �---- -
- -•-- - - ...___-- -�-----------------•--�-------••--------------- - - ---
i �uly sworn, did sey that he, the said...__Rex McDaniel y $n
• . .both to me personall known, who bein�
•
- -�------ - ----•-•--•-- ---------�-�----------------------------- - --
'; Is e------- - -----Presrdent, and9�e, the seid..._....Jan��e pe��rs�r�_..--
--- -- -- --- ----�- - ---�---
� �s the Secretary..-- -•-----••--•--•• --------•------•-------------•-�------•---�---•---•--•----••--
................. �----�-..._ of ..-••- .
the within named Corporation, and that the s�eal aff�ed to s d i���ent is the cor
' •--.ax�._Qx�ga�a_CQ •
< �&ax:at.�.Qtz..---
; tion, and Ehat the said instrument wes si�ned end sealed ire behalf of said Co:poration by authorit
S porate seel of said Corpora-
� of Directors, and_.._._.._ �
.. .ex_.1�cI�aniel--------------- �- � - - - --- and-- �--�ani.ce..�e�.er�en._.-- --------y of its Board
� ecknorvled�sed said instrument to be the free act and deed of said Corporation.
� ------ - --------- -
• ' �'"" ` '� . IN TESTIMONY
�.►Ci�'_ . . ^ y WHEREOF,I have hereunto set my hand and at7ixed
� "`" mY official seal the day and
; � �'i' ' �� :..y.�
Year last above written.
�
! �� •-••-
� --•--.. .
� • -�- -
• ---- -
- --•---
-- ---•----
� _k - -
- •- - - •--•-----------•------
�. � �otar Pvblic tor Oregon.
; �, � . My Commrssion expires__y__.(Q -7
, --f-�-
� - ----•------
f, ------
�,,.
�i I , "
1 II '�� b
,
I
�_----�.��-
_` ------.�-w..�.���_`
A w o V�3� o --�.�_
WWO o �o � �,� � .`
�� � b� �.�`- � � ' �
A ` � � � � a
�w: � 0 v�i ��� 3 n�:'� /�I a, a
Y� � C7. f , �v`°� . � "'� z
� O � f � � �� .�•'_.'" .�.� ��� �
'� F"� � o � O t � O: .��, �r�;T�".i��?.� ��. � i
. � a i-� '�. O .� w '�'7 u i. y� 1�."a. ,V..- 'T+ . (�
a � O � � � w �+ ���?.C� ^� N S� u V
(/� � � � �f � 0�,� o �� s�.'A ��c"':.� k, j � �p .
O � Q 0 v0, p v, Ew `� CN�i i t �' .:; �� O i
G�, V �? G'° t '�'' �7 -� ���•r ; Y;���y' �.Q 3
N ' pa.� �w � �8.� Q � �° `°�'c�` `—' ;
a� �i � r �i�� � 3 '- � �, :' �. .�.1�".•.b� a
� ��"' M
�, o� � ` A�''' o o S'.s �;'t��;P��� ti a
� � tn i vl ° p o; w �. �a v���t`�v� d � W
p � E ; v � , �x� +- � =W � > 'b � rn `� �
o �+ ' ; � o � a��� � � � p
; o( j `^ � o >�� z�- 3 m
._..�-----_;�,.____-_--� � � � �
-----------__-.=_.----__—�._
---------._.�_.�..---
, _ —_ ==—__._.� 4-
_ _
�!�
�nnK ��� r,r,� ����
I
, - _.
j±(2�1+jw ��—DEED-BPECIAL WARRANTY- _,orporatiow �
- ---�.--------- • M�____....._
-- --- ----------------_ ----°—.._.�____------�.�__.__.�_---------------____.�_�.—�.��__�
3U2 �
KNOW ALL MEN BY THESE PRESENTS, Thaf ____TIGARD__CHURCH__OF_GOD
- --------- --------------------
- -- -- --- �- ----- -------------------------- - -- --- --�--- ----- - - -- -- -- � ---- - ----------
------�-----------�--- - -
a corporation of the State of____Oregon___.__ . _______.______;n considerat�on ot..__One_.dollar___4_E1.00)____.________ .._
�-•------ --- - ----------�-- ----- -------------------------•----- - Dollars, ---------•---------------- ---
--- - -- --- -- -- - -- _ -- -------- ------
-- - --- - - --- - ----------------------------•------ ... ------ --- ------------�-- -the receipt whereof is hereby �cknowled�ed,
------- -- -- - -
does hereby granf, bargain, sell and convey unto.___�soCiation .of__Chur'ches__of..God..in__Oregon�__an
------Ore.qon,.._Co_rporation-,---------- - ------------
----- ----- -- ------ -- ------- �- - - -------- - -- - - - ---- - - - -
heirs and assigns forever, Ehe followin� described real properfy, situate in fhe County of._____________________..._._
---------Washington----and State of------Oregon------------------------------to-wit:
The North three (3) Acres in Lot Twenty (20), ALDERBROOK FARM, Washington County,
5tate of Oregon
'Y
To�efher with fhe tenemenfs, lzeredifaments and appurtenances thereunto belon�in�, or in any-
wise appertaining; and also all its estate, ri�ht, tifle and interest, at law and equity, therein and therefo.
To Have and to Hold the same to the said_....Association_of_ the Churches_of God in Oregon_
'---------its_.succe.SSOrs ----- ---------- ------ ----------------------------------=-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
��s and assi�ns forever. And fhe said.-----Ti.g�rd..Chuz'ch._of.God------------------------------------------•---------------------------•---
--------�------�----- --- --- --- --- �---- - -�-- �----- �---------------- ...-- ---- -- - - -- � - �------ --�-�--� -.....------ -------------------------------------•---
........................ . ...................... .........does covenant with the said__?°!s.soci.�tion .of__the.Churches_.of________
_ .... ..God-�n Ore.gon.... .. .... .. -- - -- - -�----
-- - _ - -- - _ - - - - - � --- - - -� _ . ..
......................._...__ and._.....___..its___.__.__. .le�¢al representatives forever, that it wi[l, and its successors shell, �
warranf and defend the said premises fo the said___...A,.s�Q�ia�.iqr�_.qf.._���_.Ct�u.�'ches___c?f_.God_,in_.Oregon_
------- -�--�-------._.._..-----��---- --------- �-------------------------�-----�--- --- -------�- ------- - -- - -- -�-------�- - - -----� �------- - - ---- ------ ---- ----- -
_ __________its__successors_______________________ � and assi�sns forever, against the lawful claims and
demands of all persons claiming by, tltrough or under the grantor� EXCEPT existing mortgage to
Benj. Franklin Federal Savings and Loan Association of Portland, Oregon
Done by order of the Board of Directors, with the seal of said corporation,
this- -- -- -- --- -- -.day of.....Mgy--�- --�----��- -- - --, 1971....
..._TI RCH. _..�OD_�--- --�-�---- - - -- - -- �- �� - �- -•
Execnted in Ehe presence of ��L�.
BY- �'�--- ----------- --------- -- ...Presidenf
� / TIGARD CHURCH OF GOD
.............••-•• • -�'�+-�- - �----�- ---- -------- -- - - ----�--•---------- - ---�-------------------------•-------•----•-•---••---•------------ ---- �--- -
------•
------•---------------------------------------•----....._ By...<��.�..�l�!-�'�.���f.E.e�rJ--- --------Secrefary
_.._�___._._.._ �__ -___�__� _.�_-��_ � - --, .______.,_____ .
,- ,r...r_....._. ' .
t • _-_-
„ . � �._..._._._ — . _ ��
�.��_`—
. � rG. ��. �a h,. ,�,! .1f��,,. , ..M. ..�.. le_ � '3`.'a��: �. � I {.t{' ..
.. . . , ..�... �. .�.• �� �.,. .y4{�'�... � .
� , .:�.� .. . . ,
., y ; :
.� ''T':� . ,. �. . , � �..� .
... ,STAT$=0F 1iVra r �,-th
�,: � _ ..QR�FaDN, County of �7f1
..--- - .. � _...
',}. Person,�J1Y,��yapeared __.HeYlry.G. �.1501] ) S� J v n � 7 - -- , 19 `7�
���; whP„being duly'swor�i, _
• --
_ _.
�':' the'¢hairman . �. d;d say that x�n -
-
-
c�ae�aeandc�e he_is -
y �'of'.Assqci�`tion �__Churches..�� God. in Qr�gon .. _ - _ __ -- - _ -
r seal affixed to .the fore�o�ng insfrument is the corporate seal of said corporation and t afr sar'd inst�mhaE the
, ��,
':?. si�ned �nd sealed in�behalf of said cor p o r a t i o n b y a u t h o r i t y o f i ts board of directors; and each of them acknoWyl s
,..::;;.;+� �
' ,;.�: ed�ed said ins�tr+�rrien,� to be its volurztary acE and deed.
,ti+.� , . . � .
�' ' ,,t. Before me: _. �
C"`�
��.;' (OFFI�[AL ��T�AI�� �. . _ _ __ _.- - -----� -�-- - -- ---
,• ,
.;�� r Notary Publrc for @�� -- -- -
�.,. , M ,.� ,
` Y corlun ssion ez�Dire��,,� 7,r'3 � � �� rw''
, . �.�', •!• �:��,...._.. �,
I .. .
., y�� s��TF o� okr:co�v, c�t,��r,. �f � '� ''7
..�a:<��-�-. . . � SS: ,,�.
.
I Personnity bppP , Grant..Fall... � � --- . _.. .- ...... _ . , 19...
� ..frre�, .. �� � C �
_. . -.....
____.. ._
tvhv, ,Gcir�g duly sii�or.�, <• _ _ _ .. _ . . �.
"�• , did say that� - ---�-- -.. ...--
* .� _._. ... .. -- ' • S
. ,_ ..
;, . _ . . Gx�c thc .... . .... . -- . ..._
secrc:lnry of .AssQCiation_c�f �- -
. !Churches_.oY Cod_iri..D�egon _ . .. . , $ c:>rporation, and that tl,:�.
seal �;tfixed to tl�e tore•�suing instrtarnc nt is tlie cvrpor,�!e ;eaJ c,f sard corpor•etion and tl�at said instrumc:nt Y.'8.i
�t�Sr�eel,ar ' tie<31�ed i,; k,;�haif of s��iid ,:urporation by :xuthurrty ot its board of directors; and each uf them �icknowJ-
�..;,
� � � s,;�c7 if�r.c��mer,: fo I�e its vvlur,tary act and deed.
� ' , , , ? ,
� � ..�d; : :.
' •'� 4coe �
, � � ., . � u c.- /
. ��I�
NJCIAi., s��i.�j ; - - ��� -�� �- -•- --�- - - �` -----.•_..
�. '� , ': � f _Nutary Public fnr O.i�gor� � � -
, ,
, . . ,, �
r � i,.�.•� ` ��. ' ' ".�w.,•,,�r.�Y � e�xpl�l��: . ..._��. � � ` 7
',c � . � l, t y ;�y *' COlI7ljllb5� -----. . . .._.
•_• • ` ����� ���y . t � �°'= ..-- -�-G -�
.. ^� # , , -._._
I �1 � � � k 1W'#
t� ,�� �
' . r1��.i'.. ,{}4, 1�.�.�9_�.. ��}H}:���� .. M � .�i1F�
! `: � .. �e�.s:.. . . . •- . . 'i1�.�.
1 ,
1 �
�
:S '
�
i
� – -- -----—�--�_.._
A Q, �-1 'v[.� a ,� .
Y � �U�. ; o
S� av'.'' v v,� o
W O' � � o �•.� u �
o�� � a �
, A �g � � o ���s;* N � � j �I
. � � � 0 � � . ��a" ��"�.�`��� w rc �
e°! � � : R� �C,p �,Y { '\ ,ti1 " � o \ �
� � F�i 7. LI � "' �' t� ��E.. :'''. {'�j�.�'�,. °' � � . �
a, � fs,i Q ` .�, Ci'' •a z o` ���'' ,.t,�.���,�`�' �q ; � �`I
(/) �' � O; q O; +�i p � w Y � ,,;j JY 1�';, c� � � R
� p �°, z; id x � W r �'���� �? r^I:�. '" �. 3 f�
�/ 1-1; ,� c ' "a �
W U p; a: �+ o o $�- ��°—::•���� a 4�
H; � 3 ;; ;..,�'- � �
�i �� � , �� �`• " °.° ��'��AS��� `� _ �,�
S; ; o 0
� �I � .�y� � C �W��� ''D � C� � � �
�' ° i 4` di ►a- o � a`�� � � m ; �` °
� �� � � H; �: � � o >� � Z o 3 m �,
O �,' H' O� C, � \ � �
O r �_-� �
�
�
��� 8?8 t���F 617
�
� FAR11t Nn_ �0_.DEiCiLp ['IAL WARRA. -!`nrnor�ti°m � i
�O�1
KNOW ALL MEN BY THESE PRESENTS, That ._...�S�IATION_.OF_CHIJRCHES__OF._GOD__IN
OREGON
-------------- --- ---�------ -- ----- --�------------------�--------------------------------- -- -- - - - - -- - - -- -- - - - -
-- ------------ --------
a corporation of the State of_____9_X'�gS�SI___.._._____._.._._._____in consideration of.._.Orie._SiollaX._(_�1._QO.�.__... ___...__. _
------------ ----------- ----- -- ---------------•------------------------ Dollars,-------------------------- - - - --- - ---
-- -- - - -- - - - -- --------- -
--------- - ---- -- -- ------- -----•------------•-------------•-------- - -------------- ---------- the receipf whereof is hereby acknowled ed,
does hereby grant, bar�ain, sell and convey crnto_____..T�._g�rd__Chu�'Ch___o�_._�',p��___�__Q�e.gOL1_.C�]Cpc2�'dt,3,pS�
- -it--succ�ssnrs.- -- - - -- - --- ----------�-- -----------------------------------�---� ---- - - ---- - --- --
--- - - - -- ---- - - ----- -----------
11�C and assi�ns forever, the followtn� described real property, sitvate in the County of________________________________
Washington---------------and State of.--------OX'�gotl._._..-------------------------to-wrt:
The North three (3) Acres in Lot Twenty (20), ALDERBROOK FARM, Washington County,
State of Oregon. �
Said premises are subject to mortgage of record to Benj. Franklin Federal Savings
and Loan Associa�ion of Portland, �regon. �
To have and to hold unto the said grantee so long as said grantee Church maintains �
fellowship and doctr3nal unity with the general ministerial assembly of the �
Church of God which meets annually at Anderson, Indiana. In case this property €
falls into disuse, or if in the opinion of the General Ministerial Assembly, said
grantee Church is no longer in fellowship and doctrinal unity with the Church of Go
as represented by the General Ministerial Assembly, then and in that event this
property shall go, vest in, and become the property in fee simple of grantor herein,
the said Association of Churches of God in Oregon, an Oregon Corporation.
Togefher with the tenements, heredrfamenfs and appurtenances thereunto belon�ing, or rn any- ���'�
tviae appertainin�; and also all its e�tate, ri�ht, fitle and inferesf, at law artd eqvity, therein end thereEo. ''�
��:, :
' . �;:;.,
To Have and to Hold the same to Ehe said...__Tig�Z'c�__6�urCh_of._God ___ ,._ ��r"�';
-- -r ��kj���__.tv_.�he.P��t�.s.�.ons
---------hereinabo.ve..set_.for�h_,...it�---�u�c�$.�ors-----------------------•----------•--�------•-----------._...._....-•-------•---...�...:._..---------- ,; .
� ��:�
lmdxa and �ssigns torever. And fhe safd....As�a�,i.ati�n--a�---the__Chiarchea._o£.�Cx��d;.itt_.Qx�gs�x�------------------ �
„
�
-��---------------------- ----�--�---------•---------------------�----�-� • ,. �.t'#..
---------------------------- --------- ----�---- ------�-�--- -�----------�-•------------------.....----------------------
-��-�-------------•-•----------------..------.....------.----- does covenanf with the said---Ti9ard..Church_.�._God__and__it.s_.le�,al ``:
. --�---•�-- ----.. . .- �- -�-�---- -�-��--- - -... . ------�------- - - - -- ----- �-- 1M�!'!�'i �`, . `
.......... ........---••�1 �!�
� ,.; - ----- -- --- ------ -- - .._......... ..---- - -- -- --- s �� '�r C�'
- - . ,
� war:ant and detend the said pcemis„s to Ehe said.•--.Tis3a�'d._C:h11rCh..of..s'iod..•••---....--••::-•_!-::t -�--••--' '••-...,..._.i. �'
rti:. � • ,��-
�;--•------••--•.....---•------••--•._.._.......••-•--•-------------•....:................................:.--._.._..._..._............_..
. :• ` 3�s__aticcessnrs-----�-- � arid ass�ns f'rever, p ains� fhe---lawful �claims�and
`•.••••--- � ..�•--•....-persons cla�min by, fhro� h ot ; , ,. . � ' ' Y
,'demends d� all ur�er fhe tenfor exCe t ss above mentioned. �
,� � � . . . . . � , � „ .�M1
='�' '"�" �;�� � � bone by order of the Board of birectots, with the aeal of said corporetion, � ^
_ - ,• ��, ��.� • , � i.�.
, ; . •
' �:3 , ` �, � t s----�.............. ..day of•----!la�t----...--•--•- --•-•--••---, 19•7.1---� � :k:
'�° , ,• t. }
- � � AS30CIATION OF CHURCHES OF IN ORF)C',ON � .�� '
'� ---�-�---- �- ...---��---��--•----- - -��-� ---...---�-•-------- �
� ---�-------------------------•-
:•.
- Execvfed in the presence of — :�
. . By----- --.••••- ---- -- •••••-- -• --••------- �-••---�--- ----- sidenf '�•..i
� r. .
A330CIATION OF CHU�CH� _..OF---- D IN O GON � ?,� '
------•--•-•-•-------••- -------�---•...................••--------
-----------------••-••--•--••----•- --... -----•------- - •-- -- - ..
•�-• -• ----------�-----•-
.
; .,
i �` �
, i :�,
, _
�::k':
------------••----••----•-------------------------------••••-----•------•-----------------••••---•-•- By---,::•-• ---• - ---�--•••••--- •--- ----- - -- ---�----Secretary ��h ,
r.__ � �
� ' ,,�
r .. �_...�. _.,.._._. ...._.._. ._.... ._,... ... ...._ _... ...,.�......._.. .._.....�._.. _..�..,.__ <.••r
--- ----
-- ---- —
------ - -—--- -
• RECEIVED PAYMENTS ON WITHIN CONTRACT, AS FOLLOWS:
DATE INSURANCE INTEREST INTEREST PRINCIPAL PRINCIPAL DATE INSURANCE INTEItESt INTEREST pqINCIPAL PRINCIPAL
OR TAXES PAID TO BALANCE
OR TA%ES PA10 70 ' , BALANCE
FORM No. 24—ACHNOWLED(iMENT�ORPORATION. e�� 6TEVENS-NESS LAW PUB.GO. PORTLAND ORE.
STATE OF OREGON, � �
ss. Z / �J� �
Count of.Washingt.on ' On t/us..____ _'.. � a of___.Q�-{-e'v"`"__.._....__ 19�i�__
Y • � �••---�--�-/�- -- ••---••- ,� 1C1___.__� y , ,
before e7sP ar�rd-----. �,�� iS�'�:---- ---A--�--- ----- -----------------------------------------�-----------------------------------....---------and
�4
----._...�-��-�-�{�--'-`-5=-.��C.• ---•-•-•• -- ---•�"•--?---• -- --••---•-•- -:-------both to me personally known, who bern�
duly swo n, did say that he, fhe aid--�----- - - --.r_..-- -- - .------�-----------------------------------------------------------------
-- ---
. c ,
�s the-- -----... r nt, a he, the said..----------e=�"�t--•-• --�... 1!�'►..�--------------------•---••-•-•-------•-•-----------------
rs the .�:�._�de.rx�ti-o�f-.--TIGA�D_.CH.I�_RC�I---�-F'-'---� ��-----------------------------------•-----------------------------------
the wifhin nemed Corporafion, and that the seal affixed to said instrument is the corporate seal of said Corpora-
tion, and th�t fhe sai instrvment as i��ed,and sealed in behalf of s 'd Corpora ion y e thorit of ifs Board
..,. j � �) : n � - ,�,,. ,�
o�.Dir:ectorA; atid--�----• ---�t,.�.�---��..�::�-F. --••---••-- -- - and-- ----��_-1.�.-`-�-- ��.r------•-----
�c�tr�o�/ed���s�fd instrument to be the free ac end deed of said Corporation. �
' ^-.� �� "� �! '. IN TEST ONY WHEREOF, I have herevnto set my hend end affiaed '�
; �:• ` � S- .� ,
rr�o 'cial seal fhe day and year last above written. '
L J'• b ( b :� � ► � r
.� ,�•. _ a :�, .�:. ....----- -- . .. -- -------------------- ---
` Es� �"` ,� T� . ,,�' ' � .,., •- - � oE y P ic �9 r �f
�P- -� C„a. .,�c, •�; �- ::. ._._ :.�, �,_ � My Commission eaprre ..►� 1....��.Q 1�, � '
,.. ,
.
,
.
. f�, .� ,.
. . . j
,
.. , �.
_,,,�..,�...�.,,.;.,,w._ . �-_,yr.. r ».,,,. _ _ . ; , •-,�.��j-.�,�,:� "p' �:,?
� �e� {. � �NV . ���M . . _ .._ ._. ,Iw.. 1. 1. 4 1
�•►�c1u11�4,iKa-_.ae��! `$
�� c�.
• • ' , . . ,;. ::1� :1.^. .._,;G..a li...,..LL_ :�::'4_.m_ �
• - , ��
. - i
f . �, � , . • �
t � m' �rb,,,/�' "
^ � , , �y U o I � o �
��v � � �r.
� o ' V � ; mm� ; Q ; (
t � o ��vy\ ° i m f ° ��.�'`
� a � . d • �V ��� Q F
� ' � �, ,.�; '���. , � z ":r..:
� ;, ; '� � �� . +"� `m.;'' ' ,� Zy p � � � • '
� 1 � �.. � O'�y� �'� i. ..' 0 F . �' {
� x ° �, . � � /� �� ���.,d ..,�g'y�� . i � ,�s�J
O u � WI Q � n H'�- H :�i 1 � '�'�l
m '� `ny �.-/ J.: . Q. O Y � � U�
WI 14 .+.{ 'w} .�' � i�, 't�� � Z
� O 3 I� � d � 1.�,4 -'�)' p� � 3 '?�'�.tt � � � , �'r.i
� G• �J � � � F r � � �.,;
U � �� � � °' ri.;� � � �
„ .t� z o o.� M � w W �
z � � ���'•, �� �� ��� .� � .
Q = � .� ; q �'� :bq � �_ .�:.�x �.s W � �.#
W � vhi L;,j �y 3 t " ' o p,e,� I-�'Cy }, y� ~ . LL 'a'yl
U N � � `4 � � p ..i�� = �,�+�y,q_��`.��V', � � a � ,w�,
N p
� ; � ' '� � � ��� n'� g �� � �..
. �1 d, o m p ,A m q
� � �'' � . Q �i'i c� F'.i .�.[ .� .S o 3 :�.
-- ".`; �
'�i
�'k;�
STATE OF OREGON, �i r
j
z �
SS. � .,
Covnty of W�Sk1�I�1�;�.OS1.____ .._ ___....___.. On this___9t�1 day of.. _S?P�.ember 19 64
before`me, the undersi�ned, a notary pub/ic in and for said count and state � �
Y , personally appeared the within
»amed _:'�AME�S_.W,.. CLEG.G_..a:nd._fil�7EL--R.---C_LLGG-.---.----- - - - ---
� _re�, _�:-.-. .--.. - _ . _ - _.. _ - - ._ __. __.
- _.... _..-- .... ��
_ -- - a,a a
- - -. . _.
.. ...._
S
= known t �q�� to be the idenfical indivrdval._.S described in and who executed the within instrument and
`r .. .,�
aC�CnoWled� �o me that �1�2 ,•
r�, '
, -. �� �_ ;_, y.-.__ execufed the same freely and voluntari/y.
-': ;'+ � ..� :7r '
n � �� �;, . :: IN TESTIMONY WHEREOF, I have hereunfo set my hand and affixed
`�•� ., �i:, '.7:�;�.i':; my icial seal fhe day and year last above written.
,.
• - • : ,
,. �-
, . _ . ..
„ • � . .
, �, •.... ..•• ,. .
� �
- '��. . t►
, ,
. -/� -
- - �
_._. .
. . .--� - � --
✓
k . Notary Pu� r f r Or n, l
T 5 � �• � ��'' ��.•:~ ( .."
� �*.: � :- ,. My commission expires L-� , /
��r,K ��,� ri ,' r�� _. . .. _ __ , L�:i
Fy�f� ;* �.y .,i ..F.a •� .�� f�,•' � `R7+�,': �'!A�5 '�WI.7G .. . � r.� �!'�fT Pdn4.` �i,� :.'9 �1�-:i
�`�.. �.:
<.i�. A
. .'1. . .. ... .. _. . .,, . . .. , . . . ... ,
"'�"°;* �n ? �' ' i , ,xsm�
�� fi x�; 36' +� ,_� .X° � :,i } r f � z �?r ' .
yd � � ri. : +� ����� �1�� .� .� ��I
�i �F 7 . v�-�q �' -+'� �j `�:.� �' ;� . . ..�,�.,✓�� '!:-..jFW
, r�3.:
, ,
- — -- , _ -_ __ - _ — _-_ _ —— —-- --—_-- — _ __ - - --
- -- __ ''a. ' . \'ni� a �
. ��y THIS CONTRACT, Made this 9th day of .. _ ._SePtembEr. _ ___ , 19 (�6 ,befween � � �;�
JAP�[ES YJ,CI,EGG _�nd �iA��;L _R_.CLE��_,husband-. & .wife,wi�t�--r.i�ht of._s.urv3.�a�.�-h-ip ��
hereinafter called the seller, end .. TIGAF?D C�-IURCI�__Q.F. GQD,_ an. Or.e�;on.. co.r.p.orat3.�n- --...- - ,�
_
_ _. _ _ _.__.. __ _ _.. _ . _ _ _ , hereinafter called the bUyer, :,'�
__ t. ,
WITNESSETH, That in coRSideration of the stipulations herein contained and the payments to be made
as hereinafter specified, the seller liereby a�rees to sell to the buyer and fhe buyer a�rees to pvrcHase from fhe �s�:j
seller, the followrng descrrbed real estate, situate in the County of _�IH.Sh�rigt.Ori._ __... _ . - __._-._. , 'r�
Stare of _ _.OreF;on _ _ , to-wft:
�
�
The IJortherlymost three (3) acres of Lot Tv�ent.y (20) ,
ALDERBRr)OK FARP-7, a.ccordin�; to the duly recordec� plat �
and map thereof in ►rlashington Count,y, Ore�on; '
���
SUBJECT TO ri�hts of the public in any portion within roads,
easements, conditions and restrictions of public record;
���
�
; 1
t
�s ,�
� �i
a
�
7:�
for the sum of TWELVi� .THQIISAI�II) 11I�Tn._IJ��Z.00 ---- -•---.. .-.----. _.. Dollars ($ 12,OQQ.. 00...) '�
�i:t
(hereinafter called the purchase price) �-�entra6erf�ett=`������=����c�5f9�E���BH�aH����� - '"'='Y�
?a;,
---.°--------.._.._____ 8�tf�g���s�3��T��=°°�#9��i�xt�#�e�t�c-�i�rfi#a�t�€�#��ecai#����7Fis i'�:'
_- .,;p�.
��e�,�gc�--,b;���Edla��aa��a�emaissdr,� to be paid tcr_khe order of the seller at fhe times and in
amounts as follows, to-wit: -
(a) �3 , 500 . (whic}i includes the optj_on considera.tion ) to be paid on closinp; "
(b) lleferred balance of $8, 500 , to be paid in monthlv in:�tallments ea.ch not ���
,.;,:
le�s than $100 , includin�; interest on defer .red balances from date of �_;?:
cl�osing until paid at the ..rate of 7q per annum , the .f. irst pa.yment to be �`;
rnade on January l, 1967 and a like pa.,yment on the same da.y of each suc-
ceeding calendar month until the full sum of principal and interest has
�. �
thus been paicl; PROVIDED that interest accrued on deferred balance shal ',;
, -� be paid monthly during 1966, first payment of interest tv be made on ,th �:
31sb aay after e.Zosing and additional payment� of accrued interest on �;,=!
the same day of each month thereafter . `?�;i
(c) Seller shall not be obli�;ated to accept an,y surn to at�ply �.�;a.3.n�t the
purchase price which together caith the down pa,yment sh<�,11 exceed the �w,�
surn of ��3, 600 . durin� the calendar year 1966 . ��
�+
2/tt�mbd��2ma4:1s7�daGm�lmm: all defened ba/ances of said pvrchase price ehall bear in[erest ef the rafe of....��a�p,� 7 a � �4�
/!ef cen! J�f'r annvm /r�m '�1.Q . '�}�OVe... �'�.��"j.+�(� jf P 1' _..4 /1RPCTi1f[fon o 1
. ...until aid, inferest to br nid.[�,5....a.I.l.�.t7.e S'�`[�.�.Q(�end �1 being included in +�"'
the minimum reQu/ar paymenla above requircd. Taxes on said premises (or !he current fax year ahn11 be prorated between !he parties herefo ns of the .�.;�
dafe of this confracL :�C
The bu er shall be enliN�d !o ssession ol snid landa on . . . l�Gi y�p.'..__._. . _.. . , 19._.... _, and mny relain such posaeasion nn lonQ as �.�^!
he is not in delaulf ander fhe trrma �thia eont�acl. The 6uyer a�reC-TFeCe'T a'H-�timre he will keep the buildinga on aeid premiara, now or herealter g
erecfed, in good crondkion and re�peir and will not avHer or permit any waste or sfrip theree(; f6at he wi1! keep said prem�ses tree trom mechartids i"fl
and al! other liens and save the sellrr harmless therelrom and reimbu�se se!/er (or al1 costs and nitorney's feee incu�red by him in delendin�eQein�t any 'e
auch liens; fhet he will pay al! fexes herealter levied e,Qainst said propr.rfy, as well as t/l water rents, pvblic char,¢es end municipal liens which hero- ���'�
a!!rr !awlully may be imposed �rpnn said premises, all promptly brlore !he same or any pa�f thereof become past due; fhaf at buyer�e exprnse, I*e wil! ' :,.�
inaure and keep �nsured a71 buildin�ss rrow or herealter erected on said premises a�Qairtst IO55 or demege by R�e (wifh esfended covere,Qe) in an amount
nof less fhan ,� . in a company or companies satistactory to tfie se/ler, wifh loss payable fi�sf !o the celler and fhen [o fhe buyer as
� �
fheir respecfive interes(s mny npr+rar and a/! policies of insurnnce In be deliverrd to the sefJrr as saon as insured. Nou� if the 6vy�er shal! fnil fo pay any � � �
such )iens, cosfs, water renfs, tnxrs, or chargla or (o procure and pay !or wch insurance, the sellet may do so and any pnymen[ so mnde shal! be addrd ' �'i
to nAd 6PCOme a par[ ol the debf secvred by fhis contracf end shall bear inferest at !he rafe aforeaaid, wilhouf u�aiver, hrnvever, o! nny ri,4ht nrisink to ,��i
the seller for buyer's fireach ol conhatt. , .
Thr se7ler a�¢rces thaf af his expense and within .. 1.'.rj_ days /rom Ihe date hereol, he will lvrnish unto 6uyer a /if/e insmanc� policy m-
surin� (in nn amount eqva/ !o said porthaae price) mnrketable ftle in nnd to said premiaes in the sr!!er on or au6se�uent to fhe dnte ol this nkreemerif,
save and racept the usvef printed exceptions and the buildin� and other rasfricfions and ensements rmw o( rrcord, d any. Seller elso e��eea fhal when "
said purchaee p�ice is /uUy paid and u�n request and u�n sar�ender o! lhis agreement, he wilf deliver a Rood end euf/icient dred ronveyin� said �:''1
prrm�ses in lee simple �nfo �he bvyer, his heirs and nsaiQns, tree and dear o! encambrance+ ns of fhe date hereot and lree and dear of aR encvm6rances - 6
since said date placed, permitted or arising 6y, throv�A or under seller, excepting, however, fhe said easemenls and restrictions and fhe ta:ee, municipa/
(iena, waler renfs and public char�ses so assumed 6y the 6uyer and lmtber axcrpting af/ liens and encvm6rancea creafed 6y the buyer or his nssi,¢ns. �
And it is undersfood and a�{reed 6etween said parhes fFat fime is o/ fhe essence o! this confract, and in case the buyer sha7! lail to make the ��:`,-.�
payments a6ove reqvired, or any o( the.n, pvncfua!!y u�ithin ten days ol the lime 7imiled fherefor, or lail to kecp anv a,Qreement herein contained, then �•r
the se!!er at his option shalf hnve the foflowing rights: (1) to dedere this contrac,t null and void, (2) to declnre fhe whole unpaid principe( balance o(
said purchase price with /he interesf fhereon wt once due and pnynbfe and/or (3) to toree/ose this contrTCt by svit in eqvity, and in any o! euch casea, '�
afl riQhle nnd intvesf crealed or then eristin�j in fevor ol fhe buyer ae e�{ainsf !he seller hereunder shal! utterly ceese and determine and the rigbt to the "j
�ssession n! fbe premi.see w6ove dexriAed end all o�her r�ghts acqvired by fhe buyer herrunder shn!! �ever! fo wnd revest in .vnid seOer itbovt any a t
of re-en�ry, or any other ect of said �e/!er �o be perlo�med and withouf any right ot the buyer ol refurn, reclama[ion or compensation tor moneye paid �' �
on accovnf o( the purchnse o/ snid property ae e6solutefy, (ully and perlectly as it fhis contract end such paymmts hed never been made; end in ca�e ' �
of such d�laulf a17 paymen[s fherefn/ore mwde on ihis cnntract are ln 6e refeined by and belon,¢ fn said se7!er as �hr agraPd �nd rea�onnhlr rent ol said �,,�. .•
premisee up to fhe time ol sucb delevlt. And fhe said eeRer, in case o[ such defav/t, shall have fhe ri�ht immediate/y, or at any time fherealter, to ._ °�
entv vpon fhe )and a/oresaid, wifhout any procesa ol law, and lake immediate possession thereol, logether wilM1 aR the improvemenfs and appurtenancea
thueon or LIIP�l�O be/onging. ��'���!
The buyer turfher aQrees that lailvre by the �eller al any time �o requi�e perfo�mance by the buyer o(any provision hereol ahall en no way aRect �`' .
hie riRht hereunder fo enforce fhe name, nor sha/l any waiver bx said selJer o) any breach ot eny provision he�eot be hefd to be a waever ot eny avc- �'''�'
ceeding breech ol any auch nroviaion, or aa e waiver o! fhe provision itae/L ��::'�
In case suit or ection is in+t'rtufed to forecJose fhis coneract or to enforce any ol fhe prov�s�ons hereo(, fhe 6uyer a�rees (o pny such sum as the
frial covrf mxy adjudQr reasoneh7e as attorney's leea fo 6e ellowed pleinfifl in said suit or eclion and it an xppeal is taken )rom any�ud¢mmf or decree
of euch frix! covrt, the 6uyer furthrr promiees fo pay auch sum as fhe appe/late courf aAnf! adjud�¢e reasonab)e as plaintifl's �ftorney'a Iees on such ;V
spptal. �;!
Im m�atruing thia contracf, it is vndersfood fhef fhe sr/1rr or fhe bvyer may be more than one person; fhet il the confe:f so r�quires, fhe sin�£�i- � :
!ar pronovn shal! be taken fo mean and inclvde the plurnl, fhe masculine, the leminine and thr neufer, and fhnf ,Qene�elly all /�ramnfical chenRes ahafl �j_�
be mnde, essumed and implied fo make fhe provisions hereo! apply equT!ly fo corpora�ions and fo individunls.
ti�.'1
IN WITNESS WHEREOF, said parfies have hereunto sef their hands hrs, the �;�;
day and year first above written. J, V� ��':;
• _ �SEAL� ''v
- - - - - -
_ - -y �
��v'"/��/ - � _ �/� `l � � ¢.�
, S � SEAL ,�
7 _ . _- -
i/ � � / � i
TIGARD CHURCIi OF GOD, By: .-- ---���L � ► f ,C%�-.'x'-�'•"��L) f ;
i �/ ' ���,/ �� '
°Strike whichever phraee not applicable. �y j .� /����i���� �'�'f ��..._.__�v����,,5'EAL� '.+� �'
�For notarial ecknowledgment,see reverse] tY ��'_�
---�- — _.� .—.—_ :
---------�-- --_'--- -----__----- . ------�-—-----------_ .__. .--
__. . .._ —_. ..
�— _..._-- -- - _. .,
"Exhibit A" - --l-. BOOK ��� fAGE U�1 �
�.:�
"'••• "� �o w KqNi1' DEED '
� �� ~C��� —______-- _ STEYtNS-NESS 6AW PUl.CO., PpRTLANO ORl, /��
� �
� _".__ �...--_.�__�___
_
„ �S �•� KNOW ALL MEN BY THESE PRESENTS, Th�t...JAMES_ .[•�_, CI,EGG .and. _HAZE.L_._..._�
.����g,,�'� P. CLEGG, husband and wife ,
- -
� Q � -
-- -
� -
- .
... .. .. -. . ....
. _
. __ _ ..
_ _ _ _.
�,� rn consideration of T�17 c�nd_ n� . ' , hereinafter called fhe �Sranfor,
°_ 1 �����.�.1�--- _. .
_ and o.ther v - _-- --- -------- _
__--
• . �__�_ _ Dollars,
_ _ � ua.ble._�ons.�.t�.�x.�t�.on__ . _. _
Eo �rantor paid by._. _ .TZG�,Rj) .C�'jjJR{;� Q[: (;Op 3 g�1 Oregon _�orpora.tion
_ _ _
_ _ .
does hereb - , hereinafter cal/ed the grantee,
_
� y �rant, bargain, sell and convey unto the said �rantee and granEee's It�a�s�successors and as-
si�ns, that certarn rea! property, with the tenements, hereditaments and apperrfenances thereunto belon�rng
\ or appertainrn�, situafed in the Covnfy of ____. W
�s follows, fo-wif,- ��h'lrigt.Qn_.. ._. _. and State of Ore�on, descrrbed
�
� The Northerlymost three (3) acres of Lot
,��\ T�oenty (2p) , ALd)Ep,B�00K FAR1�4, according to the
duly recorded pla.t and map thereot in 4Jasltington
.r? County, Oregon;
SUB.T�CT TO easemer�ts , condi tions and re-
strictions of public record, and ri�hts v� t�ie
public to any por_tion within roads .
----_ r
�_—� /�
--
� � „ : _, � � „ , , �
� i� ,: �, ,
''���' v' ��%` .��• �._ � ����'� � � � n ,,
3� - � L
' � N" .�, ��� �j a ^'�. I ,�'j��" � _
,�'} � 3 z, �� �� �; ,� + � F: �i' �. �'' � ��
� `� � r�
'� ` ��'� � .�� �� � �x� �r+ � 'i� '���� , �
��:!� �� ��� �"� � ;��z' X ' � ���' r '� �,��•a• �i
�n' �� �,� �� . �. i j t �s � �t:' §.
� � • � � ��°Z• �;c.._.��.�—.�f,� ,<�
��� �� , `y I : t ,ti, �� � �,, �', r,
,i 1 i��1�..3 I� Y'• i .��l � Z.i� � i IA'YV��{1 �T��,. �I'� �i'I�H._ _ l;j_..��jY 11 I .
�� �j C� � , �� � �:; �. --z�,
,,-
- -� � � _,a/ �� ��� �
To Have and to Hold the above described and �ranfed premises unfo the said�ranEee and grantee's
�teirs, svccessors and assi�ns forever.
And said �SranEor hereby covenants to end wifh said �rantee and�ranEee's
signs, Ehaf�rantor is lawfully seized in fee simple of the above �ranfed premises, free�sall encuTmbr n es
_EXC�PTING.. an.y.-_encumhr�nces-_-axi�in�...uy_,_ �l�x�g�. or under ..a -
_othe.x---thaxi.--gz�nt.s�r---on.._ans�_.a.�te�__�e�_�e�ber.--9-�.._],.�6b.__ _ _ �y _person
. -- - - ---- ----- ---- --� -- - --
_ _ - --
_.._ _ ._ ._
warrant and forever defend the above granfed premises and ever and fhat �tantor will
fvl claims and demands of all Y ParE and parcel thereof a�ainst the law-
persons whomsoevery e:�cep�*. SS above s ta ted.
In construin� this deed and where the�context so requires, the singular inclvdes the plural.
WITNESS �rar�or' �nd thrs._--__�-S___.-----daY of_-------_�� s- �
����� . ---� -- - - � ---- -- -, 19.._(.]... ,
/ �,�(%
� �
C .
-�--- C ..---!/1-: - - -- --�/- �
� �f/ ---•--•-•---��------- -
.__ _� .
�---• -
--��--- -- -
-- --- - -
----- -- --- -
----- --- - - ---- -- - -
- - - U
-
-. . .,
- - - -- --
(� � ----
ORS 93.490�
STATE OF OREGON, covnty of_ _.[:Jashingto. ' -
... .)ss. - -- --�ugus t. G 7
Personally ap eared fhe above named.__JL�1`ZCS W CLEGG and Hl1ZEL R, CI.EGG,
,. husbanc� � - ��- � -- - -�- - - - - � --- - - - _ _ ... _
--- and �r;ife_
-- �- .-- ---
• �- - �-- -- - --
�---�---�-------
_ . .
- - --- --- � --.... -� -- �................_
• � � '..•�.+::;!.,; and acknowled�ed the fore orng instrument to be._._�t?f'-lY'
. , .• --..___. _ -
, . , . .. -- -
. ,. ,. , .
. �. . . ----__vo untar
�• � {•� , ^ ,, ' Y $ct and deed.
. ' -�, BefoFe �: . �
. .
. . :
• . . .. __ �
. „
.
: . : ° �
. ,. , . ` ;�
�' . i.� � ' :- . )
--. ._.t ..�----�'-�//- ��"Z C�-d_�°":�L,�' --
- ' ^ Notary ublic for Oregon �
(OF�ICIAL,SEAL) /
�' �- My cb�i�►mission expires����a S� / C7
: _..^ - ,- -9-� - - --�-
5° WARRANTY D]EE1� STATE OF OREGON ) �� �� )
" Y�� `TnME' �J `''l. CI,EGG e� llX Counly oi Washinqton T sa �C�-"�wai
---•---•----------•--�----•----•---------•----••--�•-----°•-------° 1
D��C�A �"° '
-----�--�---------�-- `� :
--•----•----TO
-----•---••--•-••-
' 1, Roqer Th'omssen, blrzctov oi Records and
� • o,r esa3d cond E - of.C yances
� ; TIGl1RD CHLTPCH OF GUD , �ooN�. USE T„�, . °°�Y,do`t�+e e x�`Qe� � ,,,d�� a �
' •`-•-•--•-••- �nstrument o! cy
, _...__'---•----... rlt(n � tit
nve
• h within
'�� an (�re�on COTpOratlOp SPACe;RESERVED Q•.�'9s, reCeiveL� end recorded
' •-----
'"� ' - FOR RECOR�ING �n book_ � r�� . �• , �
� : ._...--•----•------•--•---••--••---� in the Records o{__ .
� ._....."""•""""""""'... LABlL IN CDUN_ • •
riea wHeRe of said County.
AFTER RECORDfNG RETURN TO "' ' ' �
USED.1 'w � .' �_
, . ;•i� �;, ; � f ' ' ", I ' I ' Witneas m I � �,
p ' }K hand and seal at8xed. `
Z' � � ! R��R �'HOMSSEN, Dlrector
„ � �
Srb f� Deputy
�, r � �T nr+ +,.�
-__--- _—___—-_--- -- -:--_—_--d��K-- 59 PacF 19� _1;
'��-i . �,�',t-�mzzoz � .3.g - _�;�--- --_---_--_—_ i
; ��
��
� �
� , �
78042483 � ,
• STREET DEDICATION f�
;
r- ^
; KNOSY ALL ��N 8y� THESE PRESENTS, that /l/,'/1R� ( /.��C/R/�� �
t
� n ��� - � � • �
i • � ' �
� here�naiter called grantor(s}� for the sume oi $ /��r� 1 ; `
, �� l
cons�ituting the actual consideration for this dee�, do hereby
�. +� �,�u,�
give, grant and dedicate` te t�r�.—=�re . .. .
, and assigns,
(strike inapplicable part) a perpetual right-of-way and easement
for street, road and utility pruposes on, over, across, under, along
� and within the following described real premises in Washington
,
� County, Oregon:
A portion of Lot 20 of the duly recozded plat of "Alderbrook Farm"
� situated in the Southvest one-quarter of Section 11, Township Z
South, Range 1 West of the Willamette Meridian, County of Washing-
ton, State of Oregon, more particularly described as fo'_�ows:
Commencing at the Northwest r_orner of said Lot 20 rrhich is also
the centerline of S.W. 96th Ave., County Road Nwnber 2048; thence
along the Nozth line of said Lot 20 :J89°54'O1"n 30.00 feet to the
East line of said S.W. 98th Ave. and th^ point of beginning of the
tract herein to be desczibed; thence along said Bast line SO•09'
16"W 395.45 feet to the South line of the North thzee acres of
said Lot 2C; the�►ce along said South line N89'S4'Ol"E 5.00 feet;
thence VO°09'16"E 395.45 feet to the North line of said Lot 20;
thence along �aici North linE S89'S4'O1"W S.QO feet to the point of
beginning.
To have and to Hold the above described and dedicated rights ,
unto the Public (�; (strike inapplicable • '
part) ior the uses and purposes hereinabove stated. � .
The graator(s) hereby coavenants that he (they) are the owner(s) � '
't �:•-�.:; .
• , ' . ti.:,�:•�:s
- in iee simple and ha�e a good and legal rfght to grant his (their) ' �:�-�•'
.; .
'y. . ;;x;rixi•
::�r��. rights above described. ; :,�.;,,�'"��
�:t,}^' `�,
..�,� . ;.. =.•��, .
-"'� IN WITNESS nHEREOF, the grantor(s) have (have) hereunto set �• ""`�'
;�`�`~-;_ his (their) hand!s} and seal(s) this � day ot L� u.sf' � '.�c':r`�:
�+`�Y;�r:- 19 .�p ` �`_�•.�;+,
�
�~y �' ���AL)'�^`_ (SEAL) . ,_,�•_ ..�•.
.�ii A , // r '_ .
,�h' iQv�. EAL) (SEAL)
�;`�� 1 (�EAL) f (SEAL) � �
;�4� ` ' /�S ,
`�:;' •
•�;_
i
•,. � �� " • STATE OF OREGO ) �
�,%' ) s s.
Count) of 1Pashington ) ��
BE IT RE►SE3iBERED, that nn this _�, day of ��-�-'?
� - r
19 7� betore me the undersigned a Notary Public fn and !or the l
.�
said County and State *sersonally appeared the within named
.t
. _E r d.� � W f I d M � �T'n1 �f G�t Q�s.( � �Q Z c� T I►+1►w�s'l S �
. aho are knoMnto me to be the identic::l individuals described 14
and who executed the vithia instrument and ac.:soWledged to me that
} theq executed the same ireelq• and voluntarily.
• IN TE3TI1dONY �HEREOF, 1 have hereunto set my haad and seal
P`,�,.,. ....•� day oi �c.t,Si�:� , 19/,1�7a
;`��`e�Ql?•�::�=: -T � _
.•� t • ' �'�/Y.�.G �.� /!�c(�-a-!7��
�s�o��;L D���.I�j Notary Public ior Oregon
>r£. ,,...±;%v Sty Co�ission Expirea: �[ /�,�y�,Z
ef eM"
' M '�AJ411�.• .
. Approved as to iorm this � d:►y oi . 19_�.
:. �j ,
.�:,�: BY: .'"
�� ' � C y At orn - City i Tigard ' _��:
�%-''�' • r..
�-y�: � �;���
��;;;� Approved as to legal description this 8� day oi .,� . � 19�. :•,',�_
.: � ; ,-�.:c i'r�
�y` BY: � r k ���
h � :1'���
` J. . x�
�r r,i�r..
(� S_���
Approved this H-� day of J vt 9�. �
�'�3;��
CZTY OP TIGABD. ORfiGON PLANNING COI�[ISS OM �•�"�''
;
y �A� �♦
1 ���1 �+�1�
1 .R'��"
�� �M
BY: � �;r: :�
.
Chai an
k�
Y
Accepded bp the Cpuacil ot .cLe Citp of Tigard.chis o�g�da�r of , 19)g. .��?�.'. �
• ' � ' ' . . �'�+� ���
... i �
• . .r�.- .� .. . B `��-/✓�� STATE Of OIIEli01t ��:�`'Tl
.. :�.�...,,�' . . .
'.^`, � ". .. � � �lCOrdlr prO�Cq Ca+�r d Y�in�tm � � � =,;�;��� �«� �
.;r`"- • .4S .
.i.�.�.�" ' �. N�wr TM�b DMr�sr d RwrN `�_ i�� s..
. ��.
ry�_,' . . .. . W EMetfrr d Ea�OMiW INe�rb► �t 6«► c\:�=•,�
. � • . u�►r�ew br�wh�.�hw'rM�s�rtMY M�w "..;r�
� ' IM w/Yrw iwerww�R d wrNYy wr wdw/
_ _ • .��,,,_ . W e�ap� w �wY�d wewr-_ °`�` '
� . . • � T �::� ..�`o.
:. ' .''= ' '- - yp_ �",;�p�,n
�t:,�j°-^-ff�*�._ -�''''�' °I 'N° C""^' -. , �zv3.a2�
'_:.1.�:•�F.:�.��::'t' '.i . . .t�t f•-
�'; � .' .�� � ;.'�•�'"_' . WNw++r w�r Yr� �/ wl �Mai � ..-�s„�
'�+ �j,�, ..��'`�" ROCE11 TMOM65[!1,•OYne1w �t '�!4-�,
� x . .r� . �� l . �N l.�a.a a Ehcn.n. "-��
���:/;�_. a��:� /�/ � i -.M'�:�.�
���xG.Y'�•�+Q�*r. � �hi r'= �i•L� .
� �.us ,, .... :, INDEXED 1 - ;_.
`e.r.v- '�;�9:Z"3 F �y i' � .
•�, ,?_..�;+;� -. . . � S�P c5 !I zT�`'7E :F..:; .X_:
.���...... . � .���.�..�.. ._.�.. ..�.� . � ''�y.�'"�..\'
aFFIDAV
IT OF MAlLIflG/POSTING NEIGHBORHOv� MEETING NOTICE
IMPORTANT NOTICE: THE APPLICANT IS REQUIRED TO MAIL THE CITY OF TIGARD A COPY OF TNE
NEIGHBORHOOD MEETING NOTICE THAT PERTAINS TO THIS AFFIDAVIT AT THE SAME TIME PROPERTIf
OWNERS ARE MAILED NOTICE, TO THE ADDRESS BELOW:
City of Tigard Planning Division �� -
13125 SW Hall Boulevard , „�.�
Tigard, OR 97223-8I89 '
IN ADDITION, THE APPLICANT SHALL SUBMIT THIS AFFIDAVIT & COPIES OF ALL NOTICES AT THE TIME OF APPLICATION.
MAILING: ���',. ,,�., �
�.�����
I, � � % � � , being duly swom, depose and say that on the��?=clay of
20 D, . I caused to have mailed to each of the e�s�s o the attact��d list, a notice of a meeting t discuss a proposed
development at(or near) i�(or77 ��t� �'—� � Ti _ �ZZ a copy
of which notice so mailed is attached hereto and made a part of ereo .
I further state that said notices were enclosed in envelopes plainly addressed to said pgrsons and were deposited on the
date indicated above in the United States Post Office located at 1 t �, 1� ,
with postage prepaid thereon.
. � - /
Signatur, n the presence of a Notary Public)
POSTING:
I, � ��'6L Q �n �Y(,� , do affirm that I am (represent) the party initiating interest in a proposed
rt dK affecting the land loc�ted at�,,(state the approximate location(s) IF no
address(s)an /or tax_,�ot(s)currentl registered) /�-�l L� -��� �cS'�" � d �l� Z L�/ ,
and did on the . S� day of��� 1 , 20�personally post noti indica ing that the site may be
proposed for a �(.� l r�u application, and the time,da te an d p lace o f a neig h bo fi o o d mee ting to
discuss the proposal.
The sign was posted at C1Yl G��G{,!�j {��yi T�i�t[m¢� `� �� n1`O PC��'`1
(state location you posted notice on property) �
��
� /
�
Signatur� n the presence of a Notary Public)
(THIS SECTION FOR A STATE OF OREGON, NOTARY PUBLIC TO COMPLETE/NOTARIZE)
STATE OF OR�-6DIl� )
Countr of �A6�f/�rTl�� ) ss.
Subscribed a sworn/ irmed before me on the_��day of��l __, 20�.
OFFICIAL SEAL ,
NANCY L.GUILD
� Nf)TARY PUBLIGOREGON
�- COMMISSION N0.332528
MY COMMISSIpN Exf7iRES MAR.14,2004 NOTA PUBLIC OF OREGON
w My Commission Expires: � -/� -D�
Applicant, please complete_the information below:
NAME OF PROJECT OR PROPOSED DEVELOPMENT:
TYPE OF PROPOSED DEVELOPMENT:
Address or General Location of Subject Property:
Subject Property Tax Map(s)and Lot#{s):
h:Uogin\pattylrnasterslatfidavR o(maYing-posting neighbortaod meeting.doc
� ' •
April 25, 2003
Dear Interested Party:
The Tigard Church of God is the owner of the property located at 15670 SW 98"'
Ave., Tigard, OR 97224. We are considering proposing a conditional use permit
application for an administrative office addition to our current facility at this
location.
Prior to applying to the City of Tigard for the necessary permits, we would like to
discuss the proposal in more detail with the surrounding property owners and
residents. You are invited to attend a meeting on:
Tuesday, May 13, 20�3
15670 SW 98"' Ave.
Tigard, OR 97224
6:00 PM
Please notice this will be an informational meeting on preliminary plans. These
plans may be altered prior to the submittal of the application to the City.
We look forward to more specifically discussion the proposal with you. Please
call us at 503-b39-4000 if you have any questions.
Sincerely,
� �
,
I
y.
Bruce Plunkett, Chair
TCOG Church Council
Tigard Church of God
Proposal for new Administrative Offices
Neighborhood Meeting May, 13, 2003
Sign in
Name Address Phone
� , . � � � �� , � ���._ � ���i
� .���� �� � � � - �
� 9 zay
2 �2 D �TN --��t-�',� ��' � /s' � GL/ �,.-� �-,�a/��, �' �Jn '" l �/�
�-3� —�5�� �"
3 ��� d�� i�S$'/ �-GP/
�
4��� /.���t .s,�
� �.3y-��-�
5 -� ,� J
"�=� '-� G-t�i-` /.5 S7 y s. �-:J- �'����.-��°�l��n �2� ��i-r�
6 l.J Gk�� l�",7 �Y S. 4�, ,Su�:-�-Ct'�-��'��� �r. lo':z4 -/��'/
;;�
7 �Gl�-e.�y�; Z��3J �xr�i►�:� t�z-D. h(� ._.���i%+1-6, ��.
� �3yo ,vw ���-�'� .5�3-zzz-9rs�
8 -.%�� ��� ��'N��� �'o�rv�vo ��o
� zzz -�is�
/'�cl�P� Z�i k- �rc.t,Fe t' �� ���
9 �
� So3-� 3�7�
� �� d �7�-�-�
10 a--n��` +z�SS te�t��S� co��-��3g ��
-� �
� `CI"� � � ����� . ��'��
11 � �g��' �
�
.. � S-���_ s�,s 8
�-- -__ �r��� �2�i�/� �� //�'
12
/���
13 - � �� v � s �v �a �v� �t/
14 � � � < < <
�
15 ��y-�,r �a�-�
16 �5��n�- W �,1�� �
, ��. , � ��s� svv � ��-, f� . ���+�
� 7 -��`� �'��-��
18
19
Zo
21
22
23
24
25
26
27 ��
Neiqhborhood Meetinq Minutes
Date: May 13, 2003 at 6pm, at Tigard Church of God
RE: Tigard Church of God — proposal for a new Administration Building
Project: New Administrative Offices for:
Tigard Church of God
15670 SW 98t" Avenue
Tigard, Oregon 97224
Representatives at the meeting:
Zaik/Miller Architects:
Jim Miller, AIA
Jackie Root
Shadle and Omundson, lnc.:
Jim Omundson
Mechanical:
Dave Dobbins
Professional Air Balance
Also present members of the Church and surrounding neighborhood. Please
refer to the sign-in sheet.
The neighborhood meeting was called to order at 6:10 pm on May 13, 2003.
A statement was given regarding the purpose of the meeting.
Jim Miller, AIA, and Jackie Root of Zaik/Miller Associates began the meeting by
describing the project. We described the site plan specifically noting where the
new building will be located on the site. Site improvements were addressed
including the addition of street trees along 98th Avenue, the three new landscape
islands in the south parking lot, and new trees along the south side of the
property. We noted the new landscaping around the Administration building as
well and the accessibility to both building from the 1:12 ramp.
Marion Todd, neighbor: Will the existing Church be connected to the new
Administration building?
ZIM: No, there is 12' in between both the Church and the new Administration
building; however the buildings are connected by a concrete walk. A covered
walk can be added in the future.
Next we walked the participants through the floor plan explaining the functions of
the building.
Bob Palm, neighbor, How much room will�here be in the craw/space for
heating?
Dave Dobbins: The crawl space is more than adequate with 40"clear. He said we
are heating the space with two small gas fumaces comparable to that of a
medium size home. There will be no noxious fumes emitted.
Will there be any raised vents on the roof, and will we burn any garbage?
Z/M: There will be no visible air conditioning units, or mechanical units on the
roof. We are keeping the existing trash receptacle but are screening with a brick
wall, which replaces the existing hedge. The neighbors were pleased about the
brick screen wall around the trash receptacle. We stated that it is against the law
to burn garbage in the City of Tigard.
Next, Zaik/Miller explained the exterior of the building describing the materials
and how we would tie the new building into the existing Church. We explained
how we would use the same type and color of brick, cedar siding and metal roof.
What color is the roof?
Z1M: The roof would be a dark bronze color. We are using metal roof because it
has a 30 year warranty and is easy to clean due to the large grove of fir trees.
The existing Church has a composition shingle roof. We are not using this type of
roof because it will be high maintenance.
We opened up the discussion to any questions:
What time would construction begin? What about the noise level?
Jim Omundson: Construction will begin at 8 am and run until 1 pm, with some
possible construction days starting at 8 am and running until 4pm. A lot of the
labor will be done with volunteers and construction will be on Tuesday-Saturday.
The noise level will be at a minimum, because there will be no large equipment
required except for the excavation which will take about one week, all other
construction noise will be average. The site will be cleaned every evening to take
care of all construction debris.
• _ � • -
Kay Pelzmer asked about the location of the building since she lives across 98"'
Avenue.
ZJM: The new Administration building will be set back into the grove of fir trees
and maintain a large grassy space in front of the building. She was concerned
that the site would be solidly built upon, and we assured her this is not the case.
What would the residents of Summe�e/d golf course see of the new building
from their property?
Z/M replied that they would see the east elevation which is primarily window wall,
and a concrete terrace.
Which trees wou/d be removed?
Z/M: We are removing a 40" fir and a 54" fir. We are saving the rest of the grove
of fir trees which will maintain the landscape buffer that exists now.
Can fhe trees be sold?
Z/M: Yes, the trees can be sold. We talked with Morton tree service who will take
down the trees and they will provide us with a name of a company that will buy
these trees. We think that the tree will sell befinreen $500 and $700 a piece which
will go towards the cost of building the project.
Marion Todd asked for a copy of the perspective drawing of the Administration
building. This was mailed to her on May 14, 2003.
The meeting was adjourned at 6:50 pm. Jackie Root was available to answer
any additional questions, no additional ques#ions were asked. The presentation
boards are on display at Tigard Church of God for both the Church and
neighbofiood to see.
Overall there were no stated objections to the proposed project.
Rpr 30• 03 •1 O: 54a p_ 1
_.._. _--•---;—�
�;� i�� _
. ,;���; _ �_ �� �1
������! A�PR 3 p 2003 � ��
CleanWate� Services !��
� Our camniiimenl is cicar. RIe Numbef z��
�����
Sensitive Area PreScreening Site Assessment
Jurisdiction �/ __ASNUVbTbN LOUNT`� Date �}��V �p ��j .
Map�Ta�c Lot 251 I (Gp 3pp . Qwner Tlfas�gl2 r�Uf4l�l D��D
Site Address 15(�7a `xtl 9gr s�L��Y)�
11&�f�12, a►� concact ��Kr� F�OT. 1�•�K/M�11.�� �4��
P�oposed Adiv'�tY f�l�)`1 �rlo/.! OF �4 Address ,9 3y0 N�JC�7NU�MsEN �/?� 20!
�l�eL_Z,800 5F �i� Z lD
p a,FjPhone 5o��,y• 9I�B
t3 /L I -
ort�u�o�y c�,n,�a�
Y N NA Y N NA
[� ❑ ❑ Sensitive Area Composite Map ❑ � � Stormwater Infrastructure maps
Map# �S 1 c�J,/� Qs#_ �6/9
Y N NA Y N NA
❑ ❑ 1Q Locally adopted studies or maps � � Q Other
Speafy gpecifY
Based on a r+eview of the abave information and the requirements of Clean Wate�Services
Design a�d Construction Standards Resolution and Order No.00.7:
❑ Sensitive ar+eas potentially exist on site or within 20Q'of the site.THE APPLICANT MUST
PERFORM A SITE CERTIFICATION PRIOR TO ISSUANCE OF A SERVICE PROVIDER
LETTER OR STORMWATER CONNECTION PERMIT.If Sensitive Areas exist on the site o�
wifhin 200 feet on adjacent properties,a Natural Resources Assessment Report may also
be required.
� Sensitive areas do not appear to exist on site or within 200'of the stte.This pre-
sc�eening site assessment does NOT eliminate the need to evaluate artd protect water
quafity sensitive areas if they are subsequently discovered on your property. NU
FURTHER SITE ASSESSMENT OR SERVICE PROVIDER I.ETTER IS REQIIIRED_THtS
FORM WILL SERVE AS AUTHORIZ_ATION TU I�SUE A STORMWATER COiVNECTION
PERMIT.
❑ The proposed activity does not meet the definition of development. NO SITE
ASSESSMENT OR SERVICE PROVIDER LETTER!S REQUIRED,
Comments:
°P'e»ql.v��� fatif �t%Ye c�.ve.t ��e�rs f� �� ��
i
Reviewed By: ��,��!���- Date: _ T o�- -
Returned to Applicant
Mail�Faz Coanter
155 N First Avenue,Suite 270•H�Isboro,O�go� 9T124 Date �/g/o� By�
Phone_ (503)846-8621 .Fax: (503)846�3525
wwW.�leanwaterservice,ar�
r'o os c�
,
a.r�r'a i 1/�
� , _ . ,
Lr�f l�, [v► l LLt, �� �S�v�C1A I �5
ARCIiITECTS PLANNERS
Conditional Use
Date: May 14, 2003
RE: Conditional Use Type III Application
Project: New Administrative Offices for:
Tigard Church of God
15670 SW 98th Avenue
Tigard, Oregon 97224
Why this is a Maior Modification:
A major modification of a conditional use comes into effect when there is an
increase in the floor area proposed for non residential use by more than 10%.
The existing Church is a one story building with a building footprint of 11,875 SF.
The new Administration Building is 2,875 SF, which is an increase of 9,000 SF or
24%, which is greater than 10% of the existing Church square footage.
Summarv of Proposal:
The existing Church building was constructed in 1978, and has a total square
footage of 11,875 SF. The current Church consists of a Main Sanctuary that
seats 160 people. There are three offices, classrooms, a kitchen and a library.
There are toilet rooms for men and women. The existing site is 275 SF X 400 SF
or 110,000 SF and has a current parking lot with103 spaces, 5 of these spaces
are currently designated handicapped spaces. We will also change two spaces in
front of the new Administration building and make those spaces handicap
accessible; one space for cars, the other for vans.
The proposed project at Tigard Church of God includes a new 2,875 SF building
for Administrative Offices. The new Administrative building would include a
waiting and reception area, work and break room, offices for the pastor and staff,
a conference room and an open space for meetings or volunteers. The new
Administration building will be located to the southeast side of the existing
Church and will be connected by a concrete walkway.
The proposed site work includes re-grading around the new building and
immediate site area, new landscaping around the building, three new landscape
islands, street trees, additional site lighting, and utility work consisting of
connection to storm water and sewer. Our civil engineer, Dan Symons, has
included a drainage swale at the south side of the Church property adjacent to
the parking lot.
� � � � . . . , � I��..�.i� .� .i_ ��r:����, >`�. � , _ ..�. � , � ,,. «_ � +��.�,.
� / , .
Parking requirements are met. The current worship space seats160 people.
According to code we need one parking space for every three people. We
currently have 103 parking spaces, which we will increase to 107 spaces by re-
striping the existing parking lot. We have proposed parking improvements such
as the addition of three landscape islands in the southern parking lot. On the
north and west sides of the property there are several large existing trees which
shade the parking lot. We will add two trees to existing landscape islands on the
north side.
We have contracted a landscape architect, Julia Lundy, to draw up a landscape
plan. We are adding eleven street trees spaced every 30' along 98th Avenue, in
accordance with the City's requirements. We are removing two, possibly three,
large fir trees on the southeast side of the property where the new Administration
building will be sited. Attached to this report is a letter from our landscape
architect who will verify the tree removal.
Narrative demonstratinq compliance:
1. Zoning District Dimensional requirements:
a. The proposed project meets the required setbacks, site coverage,
minimum natural vegetation area, and building height. Our
proposed building is 20' in height, which is less than the maximum
building height of 23�required by the City. The site is 110,000 SF,
and the total building area will be 14,750 SF (11,875 SF existing
Church, 2,875 SF new Administration building), which is less than
80%. The total landscape area is approximately 40,000 SF, which
is greater than 20°/a.
2. Neighborhood meeting:
a. Mailing to neighbors and City of Tigard on April 25, 2003. Affidavit
included in the submission.
b. Posting of signs on the week of May 11tn
c. Neighborhood meeting to be held at Tigard Church of God on
Tuesday, May 13th, at 6pm.
3. Access:
a. The property has two existing driveways that access 98th Avenue.
The pavement width of both driveways is 24', which meets the
minimum width requirements of 24'.
4. Walkway requirements:
a. Our proposed new concrete walkway will extend from the ground
floor north entry and connect to an existing sidewalk, which crosses
the existing driveway and then connects to another sidewalk that
leads to the public sidewalk in front of the property. There Wi►1 be
. % . .
an existing paved walkway from the south entry ground floor
landing of the stairs, to a ramp which leads to the before mentioned
sidewalk. Any change in grade is accomplished by the 1:12 ramp.
5. Overhead Utility lines
a. After discussion with the Church they have decided to pay the one
time fee in lieu of burying the overhead utility lines. We discovered
it would be a cost savings to pay the fee instead of burying the
lines. We understand this is a one time fee, and we will not have to
pay this fee again pending future work at this site. Please refer to
the attached memo by Brian Rager dated April 1, 2003.
6. Water supply
a. Water is currently supplied to the existing Church, and we are
planning to hook up with the existing system. The new
Administration building has finro toilet rooms; each with one toilet
and one lavatory, one small sink in the break room, and one mop
sink for the janitor, therefore the load on the system will be minimal.
b. I spoke with Rich Saddler of the City of Tigard on May 6, 2003. He
confirmed that the new Administration building has a fixture count
of 34 fixture units, which puts us below the minimum requirement of
35 units, therefore we do not have to upsize the existing water
meter.
7. Storm sewer improvements
a. Qn-site detention is not required, because the net impervious area
does not exceed 5,000 SF.
b. We are adding a new 6" pvc storm sewer line, that connects the
runoff from the new Administration building to a 4" rain drain. The
rain collects in a catch basin, and is naturally piped across the
south parking lot and will connect into a new drainage swale.
Please refer to civil drawings for details and locations.
8. Storm water quality
a. All rain from the new Administration building runs into a 4" pvc pipe
which goes through a catch basin and into a water quality drainage
swale. Please refer to civil drawings for details and locations.
9. Traffic Impact study — not required. Approved by Brian Rager April 8, 2003.
10. Impact study — this is a small project buffered on all sides by parking Iots,
land and trees. The purpose of the proposed project is designed to give the
Staff more office space. This will be accomplished by moving the Pastor
and staff from the existing Church facilities into a new Administration
building. The impact on the surrounding neighborhood and transportation
systems will be minimal, if at all.
, r' , ,
a. Parks and Schools
i. Tigard Church of God is located within a one mile radius of
Tempelton Elementary School, Tuality Junior High School,
Tigard High School, and Cook Park. The Church attendance
is from the local area. The proposed project draws
attendance from the immediate neighborhood and will not
have an impact on either the local school or park systems.
b. Transportation Systems — Bikeways
i. Currently there is an existing bikeway along the east side of
98tn Avenue, and construction will not interfere with the
bikeway. We do not anticipate any change in the amount of
people using the bikeway.
ii. There will not be an increase in traffic because we are
relocating the Pastor and staff from the existing Church to
the new Administration building. The Church members who
use this facility will continue to use it in the same manner, we
are just increasing office space. This should not increase
traffic in the area, or have an adverse affect on the existing
transportation system.
c. Water supply— please see above.
d. Sanitary sewer
i. "The nearest sanitary sewer line to this property is an 8"line
which is/ocated in Brentwood P/ace to the east. City maps
show this line has been extended to the east boundary of
this site. However, there are no asbuilts available for the last
segment of the sewer line. Based upon the asbui/t
information we do have, we can estimate that the depth of
the cleanout af the church boundary is approximate/y four
feet deep. The proposed deve/opment must be connected
to a public sanitary sewer. It is the deve/oper's responsibility
to provide a suitab/e connection for the new building
addition." Pre-application conference notes April 8, 2003.
ii. We are providing a 4" line from the new building that will be
connected to the 6" line into Brentwood place. The
Contractor will verify location and depth of the existing
sanitary sewer to be 1' below the new footing. Please refer
to civil drawings for specific notes.
e. Storm drainage
i. Storm drainage for the new building wi�l flow into a
downspout connection with a cleanout to a 4" rain drain.
The storm drainage will be filtered through a 5' deep trapped
catch basin into a 6" pvc pipe. This pipe will run into a water
quality swale with catch basin located along the southern
edge of the property. Please refer to civil drawings for notes
and details.
f. Noise impacts
i. The property is bordered on the west by 98th Avenue. It is
bordered on the north and east sides by residences and the
Summerfield Golf Course. To the south the Church is
bordered by the Southwest Church of Christ. The new
Administration building is located 90' from the west and 75'
to the south property lines. Landscape berms screen the
church on the west side, hedges and a 6' high fence screen
the property on the north, the golf course and a large grove
of 70' high fir trees screen the property to the east. The
south side of the Church has a large landscape area and we
are replacing the existing dogwood trees with three maples
that will work with the wet conditions of the drainage swale,
and provide shade to the parking lot.
ii. Most activity in the new Administration building will take
place Monday through Friday, 8 am to 5pm. The existing
Church has offices for the Staff but the space no longer
meets there needs. The purpose of this project is to move
the Staff into a new office space that will better meet their
needs. The site is very quiet with a low level of traffic flow on
98tn Avenue, and we feel this new building will not impact the
noise level on the site.
11.Special setbacks-does not apply to this project.
12.Existing Buffering and screening on the property— please refer to site plan.
a. North side-
i. There is 6'-7' high chain link fence, which separates
residences and the Summerfield golf course driving range,
from the Tigard Church of God property.
b. East side—
i. The Summerfield golf course backs the Church property to
the east. This is also were the nice grove of large fir trees is
located.
c. South side-
i. The Southwest Church of Christ borders Tigard Church to
the east. There is a landscaped area that provides a buffer
zone between the two properties. We will be planting three
new maple trees along the property line, there is also an
existing 3' hedge to the east.
d. West side-
i. There is approximately 45' from 98th Avenue to the
beginning of the church parking lot. This area is a bermed
�
landscape area that shields the Church from the street. This
berm is planted with lawn and low plantings, there are 3
cherry trees, a 25" pine, and a 38" fir in this area. The
existing Church is situated approximately 90' off the street,
and the new Administration building is almost 200' from the
street and is buffered on all sides buy either landscaping,
parking lot, or building.
e. Overall this project is buffered on all sides by landscaping fences,
hedges, paved areas and the Church itself.
13.Street trees
a. We have hired a landscape architect, Julia Lundy who will submit a
landscape plan showing the new street trees. The length of the
property is 400', if we space trees at one per every 30' we will have
a total of 11 new street trees.
b. I spoke with Brian Rager on April 19, 2003, regarding the
placement of the new street trees. The existing planting strip
between SW 98th Avenue and the public sidewalk is 4'. Our
landscape architect suggested planting all street trees to east side
of the sidewalk, instead of planting the trees in the strip on the west
side adjacent to the street. This would give the trees more room to
grow, because of the 20' landscape area on the east side of the
sidewalk, please see site plan. It would also allow for the same
visual effect of trees lining SW 98th, and would provide shade.
Brian Rager stated that planting the street trees in this location
would be fine as long as the new trees would be planted at least 2'
to the east of the public sidewalk. The street trees we will plant will
be of the acceptable size and type of tree off the approved list from
the City of Tigard, please see the landscape plan.
14.Clear vision area
a. There are no existing obstructions within the clear vision area. The
view from both driveways to 98th Avenue is clear. All clear site lines
between 3' and 8' are maintained.
15.Landscaping
a. We are adding eleven street trees, from the approved list from the
City of Tigard.
b. We are adding three landscape parking islands in the south parking
lot. Each island will contain shade trees and low plantings.
c. We are removing two possibly three large fir trees in order to make
room for the new building.
d. We are adding bushes and low plantings around the new
Administration building. We will tie this into the existing
landscaping by matching plant species that exist on site.
e. Lighting — Currently the property is lit by six light poles adjacent to
both north and south parking lots. We plan to add three more light
poles with a double light to better illuminate the south parking lot,
which is adjacent to the new Administration building. These light
poles will be placed in the center of three new landscape islands;
for Iocations please refer to the site plan. The existing parking lots
are well illuminated, however we feel the additional of three light
poles will add to the safety and overall aesthetic effect.
16.Recycling
a. Pride Disposal Service was contacted. We are leaving the small
trash dumpster in the same location as it is now, and that works
well for disposal pick-up. Currently the dumpster is screened by a
low hedge. This hedge will be removed when construction begins.
We propose replacing the hedge with a 4' high brick screen wall.
This screen wall will hide the view of the dumpster form the street.
The screen wall is open on the east side to maintain easy access
for disposal of trash and recycling. There is a distance of 12' from
the parking lot to the dumpster, which is roughly the same distance
as exists today.
17.Fire Protection
a. I spoke with Eric McMullen of the Tualatin Valley Fire and Rescue
District on May 8, 2003. He stated that his two main concerns are
access for the fire engines to the site, and the location of the fire
hydrants in relation to the building.
b. Access — There are two driveways from 98th Avenue into the
Church parking lot. The drive on the north side is closest to the
Church, the south drive is closest to the proposed Administration
building. Both driveways meet the City's requirement of 24' in width.
c. Fire hydrants —There are two fire hydrants located adjacent to the
property. One fire hydrant is located on the northwest corner of the
property. There is a distance of 105' from the hydrant to the corner
of the Church. The second fire hydrant is located on the south
central side of the Church prope�ty. There is a distance of 140'
from the hydrant to the entry of the new Administration building.
The maximum hose length distance is 150'. Therefore both fire
hydrant locations will easily accommodate the distance. All areas of
both building will be able to be reached.
18. Parking
a. The main assembly area holds 160 seats. Currently there are 103
total parking spaces, which exceed the one required parking space for
every three seats.
b. We are re-striping the south parking lot, and adding one handicap
space, and one handicap van space. This will bring the total as follows:
i. 100 parking spaces
ii. 6 handicap spaces
iii. 1 handicap van space
iv. 107 total parking spaces
This gives us an increase of four spaces. There will be twelve
spaces designated as compact spaces. The standard and compact
parking spaces comply with the dimensions noted in the City of
Tigard Development Code Section 18.765.040. All handicap
spaces will be clearly marked with a sign and painted with the
wheelchair symboL
19. Loading area requirements
a. The proposed Administration building is 2,875 SF which falls under
the maximum10,000 SF, therefore we are not required to provide a
loading area.
b. In addition Tigard Church of God does not receive or distribute
material or merchandise by truck. This Church serves as a meeting
and gathering place for people not materials, therefore a loading
space is not necessary.
20. Bike racks
a. Currently there are no bike racks on the property. We will be adding
a galvanized steel bike rack that can hold up to 5 bicycles at a time.
This will be located adjacent to the existing Church on the north
side, of the building next to the entry door. We will be adding a new
concrete slab, and we will embed the bike rake in the slab.
21. There are no sensitive lands, and no steep slopes on the property.
22. Clean Water Services letter—attached to this report.
23. Sign permits —we are not adding any signs at this time.
24. Tree removal/mitigation
a. We are removing two, possibly three, fir trees to the southeast
side of the existing Church. The tree removal is necessary because
that is where the new Administration building will be built. The site
contains several large, old, beautiful fir trees. When the new
Administration building was being designed we took into account
the grove of fir trees, and sited the building to remove as few of the
fir trees as possible. We may have to remove a third tree due to its
close proximity to the new building. The root structure of the third
fir tree may interfere with the new concrete terrace on the south
side, and the root structure may be damaged.
b. We will obtain a letter from our landscape architect in regards to the
removal of the trees. We do not have to replace these trees
because we are not taking out over 10% of the existing trees and
these are large fir trees, most have a diameter between 40"-50".
Mitigation is not required, because we are retaining over 75% of the
existing trees12" or greater in caliper. Our landscape architect will
identify both trees to be removed. We can not replace these two
trees specifically because they are a 40", and 54" firs. We are
adding six trees in the parking lot and eleven trees along the street.
Because the site is already heavily treed we feel that it is not
necessary to replace these two trees; in addition there will not be
space to put new trees along the east side of the property because
of the large existing firs. We will protect the existing fir trees during
construction with a fence. Our landscape architect will provide a
detailed report, protection, and removal plan.
c. There are finro small 2" caliper dogwood trees on south side of the
property. These dogwoods will have to be removed and relocated
due to the new drainage swale we are putting in. We are looking at
replacing the dogwoods with three maple trees. For new dogwood
locations please see landscape plan. These maples will give shade
to the parking lot as well as helping to screen the adjacent Church
property.
Page 1 of 1 �
Jim Mlller
From: "Brian Rager" <BRIANR cLDci.tigard.or.us>
To: <jimm@zaikmiller.com>
Sent: Monday, April 21, 2003 3:56 PM
Subject: Fee In-Lieu
Just to confirm that the fee in-lieu of undergrounding is a one-time fee, paid on the frontage
of the site subject to the land use decision.
Let me know if you have other questions.
4/22/2003
►.�YMONS 12805 S.E.FosterRoad
ENGINEERING Portland, OR 97236
CONSULTANTS, Inc. (503)760-1353
FAX 762-1962
WATER QUALITY & CONVEYANCE CALCULATIONS
for
ZAIK / MILLER ASSOCIATES
TIGARD CHURCH OF GOD
ADMINISTRATION BUILDING
Tigard, OR
March, 2003
��.��� PR�FFS
�w��,6,0�,�����
� �
���
OREGO
�
� v��y21'�9� �
9N E. SYM��
RENEWS 6/30/04
SYMONS ENGINEERING CONSULTANTS, Inc.
PROJECT�I� T� ���/�-�"(/�C/L�(��C7D PAGE J/ s
JOB NO. ?S�vZ-
�fYT�i� ��L/T� GAG GS' BY ;C� DATE �
�'/.��,�! SU�r�fl:`-Y
�'2��os�v //y���,�'r,/ �f-,�G'� - �4v.�i� �o� �J �S/.� s,�
,�x�sri,�y �/�P��er� ���a ��i�v� ��r��r� /z 8z s r
l��T /�y c���s� 3233 s r
1 Yfl Ti�i� (�UAG�T`y �OG�//`��
o, 3� ,� �.3�/SS.� ��z = /3.S �•�
ly�T��z G�r/.��,r�/ ��ov-
/3S � ,F �/�¢�� = D. OO9'� G�_S'
1��"�'E>/l�,L v �S�y,4-L�- n. -- �. z� �: / .��,�,� .�Go�.zrs
r431'vrl�l7
? �3T�7. 1,�-����
�= v. oos �` _ �• � � /=�s � = o, 06 �.T
� = 9�,-,,q- X G o s� � v. v� l=r - 3z, � ,
��v s��
, , ,
80 ��,�-•��-nG�, (�s� �o , �= S o = 2z r,��
. D 6 fPS�6 0)
�f�,�G� �� 1�= 0, �4S
C�� = D.� ,�c ( 3 ") v. 9 = D•z � cFs cC = o.z .�r
�= c�, s- /=-y.r � z u �=�J p,,�
SYMONS ENGINEERING CONSULTANTS, Inc.
PROJECT PAGE Z/S
JOB N0.
BY DATE
Cf�,�G� �"v/-��� �o.� ��-v�'�-1 �v✓� ra���v�
�/G� V = C7,�U ��S/.S �- ��o�c 7v�� �z = ? �Z c,�
��L�r = ?�Z //� ��D = p, O /yC� C�S
�//C�>�T�O S'4y A-Z E v� � U. z�- ��l S�o.� s'WP�s
A-cTV.4rL � � \!/:7_� �j T,•`�,
s = o. o aG 8 'U"- �• u 9 F�r c� = n.0 9�
� = 9 x 6o x U. o9 = �fS-� �
/�-S� ��/�4'/L�J�L,� 7' /D D � �, k.
C'���G�-� 7J2� Y� _' C�• Og-S
�— �IvC c-U,o Fs ��•o o S•f_ ��arJ �w.s77�y y �o o�=
v �
C�z>- - o, z .s �� (3�' J 0 9 = D, 6 3 cFs oC = p, 2s
� - p, 9 �ps � z D ,c�s� C��
Cf��G�C �!/Ll7 L.�L.� 1'�-,�.90 7'� C�1�C.�C��"I� �.�/G7"/o�l Ld 5.�,�s
,�.��; �.c'r.9�c .3a /CZ- G?ZS o• 6 �3 c i-s D= o, s'
�6 = O./l G �T L "U-= 3�� ���-
� = -u� l�
V,(,C��NEl�NT/G Ii�SC�.s/TY)
�o/�! %�o oDY �/����
�� G � o• s�
/2/ �/o-s '� SU° � o �= C�- (7!�
_ /�? t, ��7 S
SYMONS ENGINEERING CONSULTANTS, Inc.
PROJECT PAGE 3/S
JOB NO.
BY DATE
�/fI✓A'/L�LC � ��C �` f��.ti.T � ,/Exir �' �l i+r✓° �L.ff�o �v
y � ZZ '
0• / �S9
�j� - /'� L X '"�-"� = d, o/G x //8 X � ���` � o. 70 '
T
� zy o:s <�) 3z.Z
�1��`,'l " �'�- /^�� � "" �. ,S � �, � �I `✓ y� - O. O y_ �
� �
h�- = C� / ��"�L�z � _ /- v �o. i �s�� = n.� y '
�elT G l �
�i o = � � L.e � �� = o. o/G (30) o,�g.�-� = C�. o � '
9 � Z
9
v '
�T� - I �
2.2 z ' ,4-r�,q-��.�-r.�Lr > � �� , o.�
' ' � N
� � �
. .
� � sm.r.Fti�sn
_ � —_._......_.
, , �_.
� �__ �. _ -
; �.l.
,1 i -- _ �
�
J� i . � � �, �, . .....\ � __. .....
1 � - .._....__.
� !i \ \ I _ ...I
: J
`
�i � � "`, r
I, \ � � .._ _ .. - - _ --- '
..o�u a�� `, i, . . � \ - . _ /..j \ . -_._. -- -
.
.
;-, ,. � � �� ( � .._ � /� (. ___
. .-_� .
;
�W __„' v. .. �. �� \` ' ;' �-I - _'" , i
J� C
'� i ..
. . I _. . _ —.
, :_.._. � .. � -. + _ _
. ,. _.... ; ' ' _,
, .., _
_
-- ....
�9 �.. .' -� iev.� ''.. � SFDIYEN \ _-_
j � `
,,. . �—q..__ _y . .
t9 _
_.�� \�'� � •, \. , '• � �� � . ��"'� \
/ ,['� � �...- � • V 'KRIfY LOCITION ANO •. �� __'
T
ue'».� ) �� `��, b[vrn cr[aSDr�c '.... .�" -*`-- -`��.
� • ..-�---'-.- `• � �•\ ,.._ SA/.hi.1R1.IO BC I' .....�// ,.. �� i f
/ •'.
J .•- '-. • • .�av�� BCiOM'�ICM lOOFI/G Q4 \._.' /� �� I
_._... _ .. . . . .._',.. �
1 :�' �'�.... -'- . �',�i.ar\ YCRE AND TO BC Of UPC +o ....�..��..t � � I .` ............
7
cv.t �� � '. ��S-� CONPUAH7 Y.1T[RI,�LS. 6% , v � � I^ a�„� � �R ��
� ,�/� � REPI�CE MT1 01.TO 5' / �+�+
i
__,_- RD+OK CA15PVC ��.�' EYQVD -'- -
' FAIN ORNN / B IF NDL . / I
_•-' \
��^^ /' BUBBIfR,CONNEC7 I �� __ - DC N(�AUSE Oi
� �.c��� � �TJ.?'•.....`-^ LfAO TO NCW RAW ,•:G •i� i i a -'...� �{ W 1�NIS'AVPflJkIYA�C ARE��7
, /
_ �.� ��.. / DRAW '. `� �..'...r. � , '.� m � _ I 7ME SATYAC71p/0(THE
.0 , ,�w+�wr• .�ti'._. .. 1 �crY � ' . y '_ .. ..-- _. �
` � _.
J �j I` PRJ.FCT Y�w�4YR. RE7A1R
���-.,.,. ; i i
y� ,! �r�� jJ��-- S.. ..._ � � ! �_. �� i AIBORAGY AND/QR GATM FA
` ��j ��M �� � NEN��ADMINIS7RA710N ' EU4INAT[�PPVDI�ANO�SSURE
i
�w�; -.__- ..f ��i M1.�wl � .a -.. UILDINC ? __ I _"' --__ P09A1£DRAINAGC
w
M
I � -�, r,'° � ' ; 45is�s F I�� _,�r __ ' _ _— ,��
, ,,,.;, �
\ : . �N . .,; i�
f �` --- _ _.-_.
---`-- EXI57lNC CHURCH ` ; . : �
H ,
� ....�i ' � -�.�� -'. . _ .
n.�.n�m !� � �•"�..'. .. 'RC �0.07. �
:�-_.�.� [.:-.- �.
.�.
.__ : �oo-�.._�. u.-.a_s. .. , . . .'
\��---�-s '
�awni m�,.s,�. �' ; � ' �u+k OU� -.__. � t :i.. i .o
' �a.. � .�� ; " �xr+sPaur wni ar,wour ;; � Ja
- --� .�•, � j /l� i I � GAPABWMS Cp+NCCiCD 70 1' --_' C�
I �: � �. / /�I I � '. AB$RAIN OFAIN$MM MIN.TS � �---.... �- - �
i ? 1Y�v.•. 7I � I:� AQ°E. il9 •., --..._.. _ •i � � LRA�'£L YM.9"Rllb(APRM
j
..� I /i , . . ._�-_... -.__. _ CF 70 S.f.Oi 1'
� �`' a[c w� � I 1 � SFprEM7 iRAV.VSF 5.D� � ! OKR MD1£N CE07CXTIlL
�I� ';' ; '��°�w �I ' �ECA5�7 VAUQT M.iNN1�ERPCAL � --..._-- �--" ��-
' �� PR
- � ^YV` rn �I I � INLE7�SEDIMfNi MLIR SEi TO
: .._j .
�� MEI:.HT I. IN,AN[1 A ---- •,
i
Q� : � ' --�---}�--...._ -_.._._ SE01NEN7 FENLY
�',� �w I i ., ; RFNOYEABLE DD1M'-RH7N[p I
.: -_.�s�H.ir �.:� �� p,. CUiLFTfiBOW ' . � ;,�, �
,I 1 I `p I ,..-_ _' t___t_-- ; - _.'_
`u. � _�_'_ � ',� u�-�.r.• �! � Y�' h , f ��l f �I MACF 111E 500 ANTABL£iQ4
. .� �. j/ / , ., I$ ry �i , � '�...—._ r`r . »rr ccwnmavs iN ruu urc�
\.:..
^ -.°L � y � ; �i n: �6 . �"t� � -- asnme[n er w�rrR ou�un
� �c � ewrT..w<�� .�..-_J I ONNEN Q�11PV �. hl C� � ' :� -�._�_y.•' , �..._ SrAlF CpJ57RUCi1W.
� � �:.. ....
r I ' ' moeru worc ♦s�vs�.w�Y�� T;��� M'TFftCEFT WRB GR�IN l� �'"' � ry: __ --'._ WTQV A
.._._ i •rr� ,y� r •..._- i �`AeD COrvNC[T!0 r+fw • ' 1 7'BOTlW MOM.
rr
n : in ' ' AIN DRAIN SYSIFM t' -�=-... I M1-.-_ PIACf 1�-��RI�FR RQG(
I t �r I � ! . S� . � 1S �� -� DCCP OIER JJIE 4AT OY£R
�� i __.�.'_ ��'�,. f . � �..hC�S�.�- . r...: I � __ ' ' _ __ Z EN i1RE IENGiM
I , _ i :1 �,�= f ' � ,.— .—�_—
� , .. r t}-� . ._--- • tro�c . ..k- - --��... _..__ rnic��i'i vuas�.
�_�., : ti
.... � �am rw
.._.._ . Y F ...� r � .
----� ' �..�.....�..vn .�._�a-�.,..--^-_.._.....w . _._. .. �� -
.,•� ..�.� .-,- ; r�,�-._�n._:. co �-=:..�, �
�. . • n�rs.iHO�cerro iocnna7-' ' " --...
�i]4�EwSnrvc S1(RU � ~ '� M�LFr aROTECnqv 1 E 219 SO
'� �SEMER OENATC$fRO�.i � •S I r��i 1 i rw ni.�r+�wrK��qy
_.....� / t9]B��PFRWT EIAN$ ._._. 1 I ; I+ . -__...
ap
� _,�-! � i f � I � `�
L •'�� .� I a j � �' 3 � I� I �, _._ .. BfK1 EHO Of NEW 6'MppE P1PE.PL�CC I6
j ...... l ' �1 . � � �y� ' S f OF i' GRAYti AROUNO PIPE YIN.B
' f ,I/ :�..�� � � �.���� � j i r'�`, _ \ � � NLElpRp7CCA0N-S:' iklCx APRW)OKR MVKH CEOTEXTIIF
., �
n Y / � � ` ' � �rR \f\ � � �'C �Ni 6'MOLF IN CAiCH 6AS/N WALL AT
i
.:.:._� - - . ._�-... . '' "' - �
....-, • � I �.e ..- -' " . - , ' � : • r. � . `1 -_ _ � j "��.... $NIE I.E.AS F1tl5PNL. A7TACM PA£T
/r-)o'Lr la' !```N ' _--' ' :' ; ..�'� .'. .""_' • �� � - jj NUB TO Ex7ERlp7 0!CB wALL M7H
' i IiL�.[�YYtiEMT 1 � .' ��,. �-. �-�-....-...-.__, __ w�TCFPpIT COnNECTKM+
� / 651991 iL )i� � .• ;1 l t �-L ^�� ��
.n �= n -)J Ytl '� .._ ' �'� -- •.. -- ��,. ' n' I .
� � • _____ t � . ._ 'lE)
. __.._.._ ___- ._.- w �\.
�..
m - • �•,1� � ' ' ' '
I +t i
c Y.u�. ..�.�_ �� �_. - ... ,... � � ..J,...._.-'_-_. "
�. i �.-���.. _. .. -'_ __, �. i _ . ._.�. "
__... __� � 1 _
-. - -... .. - :.� _
� -31--l' _�.S7� �i..1 i��' S/� B iVC ' '� , I 3'nDf L�YYCNi
:•� ••-'� ��.•�.� . • M - �'�57�� _--_.'_._ .w0 OCIYC�IION T0
. `� • -
Yi'.�.. � v._ c_�..�� �...���.aKat��.. . �,..+r�� ��w�[f m� _ �..�y.�ST�.-�-_ MCPUBUC
9L' -r-:'���-.E .'. �.�- �: xr....�'�'� _._ .
_.. ..y ; ' Jff—— ._::� . .. �
..,.. ..-. . ..�'v�� _....�.�_".' _ .. '�. .. ....�-w�`�w�!�j,��JisJ� : �si-� . .
T .�._....._. .���I�i - ��-- _' .r/ � -:.. _ � _ )D Wl1lJ
�} 'a.�a.:. -- - t.�::':.
1 j �-s......�.�-���...�.�.. .. - ��X .�_ LY 1 `�� ���r�- � 1.�w� �
nY c� ......e...n.. �..,: '
��!' Z�
�i :.
� � ���. �7
.,�.__.�. ,A. ���
} '.
r
y `uwi� �'�-.., ........."...... `'��` �c v -l-v�.-.......... , ..� `I/T" -�r.'Y�K e.[.��F...�....._r.,_�„�s.'3"�.�.._.j..—�,_„_r LL� �j
�\ � �� wsu 1' 'W" •--
`1 � •ua. ��:..
_..,� � \` � ���. ��..... ���., , \
-_" ' /l � S.W. 98th A VE. ' .
._ .
_— _,- . _.. �
r-�,- �-�L_____._._____.�:� �� m>' : � ".. --__ -__ - __.
, _--- _ _.
__..._ �.__..._:.,.__---_.�.�..... �.
___ ''-------
• �� ---;.�_.____......_...._ _---—.._._...-----
' vi Y O �. �.,___.V_._... _..__
. " �—'----- -.r,.,_._.,�—_,�-�_
DRAINAGE / EROSION CONTROL PLAN N/OJRTH �
�� S�Uf ,-_20� /�/(/�
0 6 10� `l� \
�/ NUTC SEE$HEF!C:�M MOI710N,LL 5p[C AND DfTAILS `
, a . . . .
+: � •
t.�
. • • >.
.
!
:*.+
a. .
<t,; }
� K:i
- �1��1__����11��,�1__� �����_-����,1��.�1_-����1����� _ -����1����, �
...��...■■■.�■■►..��. 1i=..... ....l�C�.........�
�m�.�■�����■� . ���in�r�m �
■�� .■■■■.�■■.����■■ .��■■����.■■■■.�■.�� �.■■■■��■■..��.■■■■��■■.��
■�\ �/���������I�w���=iii��ii��������1����1�������1�����������11����1
�111 ■�����������ia���..■�....�������������������u�����������i�����i
; �III . ■���II��III�►1���111■�III�����111�/111����■111■�III��■��III��111
_ 1111� ■���II■/111��►1��111�1111�����111■�III�����111��111�����111�1111
..... ---...�-■ •�...�.....�....�.-�--...�....�----...�....�----...�....
..... �...-...._•���..........���..........���.....�....���.....�....
..... .....-•...���... �....��--....�....���.-...�....���--...�....
....� .....�..:-��;..3� ......���..........���..........���.....�....
....�. .........:��_-...�.■■..���..........���..■....■..���.■■..�....
....�. ■.•......�.��.■..,�...:_-_---_•--__-----_---_�-:_-__---------
`' ....�, .....■...���.■■.■. ...�.��:::......:���:.:::..::.���.::::�::::
■�u� • ■�n�c•u������u�=�n������u■����������u��������■��u���u
■���� . ■�:�����:���������►����������������������������������t������� ,�.
���� ■��1�1 ■�■���\��I������I���LU���■��U��������■■����■������■��11����1 i�
�' �����\\■■t�::\�i��������:■�:L!����■��I����1���■■���■����������1�■■�U «
■�����\������\���1����■�I������►7��■������������■��������t����\�1������
■������■����\\�:1����■�1�■■�������■�\I���������■����\������■■�1��■��1
�', ■�11�����■11�■►\!���\�:!!�■��I�n■����1■■������■�����■��I����■�11����1
'" - ��II��I����11����i�\\■■��Il���ii��!��■��1����1��■■■�II�■��1��■■��11�■111
"y'�.` ������Y�����������\�\���������������������������� ■����������������\�■
■������'���������������-�������������a��������������=i�������������������■
■�����a��������������G�..����������,����������������������������������■ r.
m;.: uu���.��o���u����o���u��w�����,u��u�������n�ou������u�on
..�����r������.�����v������i��'�������■�������������������������������
i ■����������������������������i��=��.■.������������������������������■ g
.��• ������������������������!����t��������i�����____�_�����'���������_�_ -
y.., ■������■�������������►t�:\�\�����■�����\������_�������������\��������
■���������������������\:/\���!������\����►f��� ■���������������/���t�
�...� ■������■������������■■��\\►\i:��������■����7�������■�������■���������
-^ �������■���/�■��I���■��I��.:a!����i...�����t���■���■�������■���t����� _
a_ ■�����■■/��1■���1����■ ����\�i\\���5���■■��i��VA���������������11����1
■��������■���■��I����■��������\��■\/���ii:: _
-" ��11��■�■��1����1��■���11■��Il�l�\����I����I�����iii�.�:::������"��:::
- r • i111�■�■��11■��11����■111��111�1������:�!!�I��■���i���1�1���■��II��t11
` ��II������11��111��■■��II���II�1����:!:►�111���=!!!1�:�11������11���11
��.� �III�■����II■�111��■�■�II■�111�1��■�Ii!\::ii��■■�III��I�il�����ni���i�
' 1111�■■���II��111�����111■�II 1�►`�Il���i�::!!!!�I�ia��1111��111 ";
� � 1111��■�1111�1111�■���III�111� 1�1111\■��ii::!!111���1:l111��111 �:
, .• 1�������1����1�������1����1�����1��1�����������1�����1������■��IC,���� _
■�/1��■■����■���1������1�����1��������1���������►\�I�■��1������11■���I
- ��������������������������������������������������:r������ ���■ �����.
.■���..■■■.�■■..���.■■.��■■..���■.■■■.�■■■.���■■■■��._..��C.■.■i�■■.��
-<:
■�����■��■�������w�■�����■�����������u■■������■�������.:���■■�u�����
>;
... . ..
.,1..
. .. . . .
� �• �
{
�,,
a-
;..
�
' <
�..- ._ �. . .� i �''" .ti..y+V.�. -'. �J'
:... .����.� � " '.C.:� h:�.
•. t .� � -1-� 'l R.Y - .. '.s.. � :/.��.�: . �, . _ ..'..'�. l � . Yf /
:j•
l
r oY�IS ah
�� � o v�
� � �__'"" / l�y1.0�C�.l.�F�" �•..C.
� n N u s c n �� F n K c H i T E c T
May 14, 2003
Mr. Brad Kilby
City of Tigard
1312 S.W. Hall Blvd
Tigard, OR 97223
Re: Tigard Church of God - Administration Building Construction Project P�ST oFF��E Box 9034
P()RTIAND, OREG[)N 972�7
Dear Mr. Kilby,
TtL% F�1i: 5f).i-LLi-U�iUS
Our firm has been retained to offer consulting services and prepare landscaping plans
for the above named project.
We have attached, herewith, our plan showing the selection and placement of new
trees as well as designation of 2 Firs that will need to be removed.
The new building and adjacent constructed areas were carefully sited and designed to
minimize any impact Qn the existing stand of mature conifers, accomodate the Church's
need for easy access between the new and existing buildings and preserve the site
designated for additional construction in a few years.
Last week I met on site with the architecu and general contractor to discuss our particular
concern for the large (58" cal.) Fir off the N.E. corner of the proposed terrace on the East side of
� the new building. We reduced the terrace by six feet to allow a wider circumference of clearance
around the tree. We discussed with the general contractor the importance of the Firs' protection
from trucks and equipment driving near and over the vees' major root structures. A sturdy
fencing barrier will be installed at a reasonable distance from the trees that are most in danger of
being impacted. Morton Tree Service will be consulted during excavatio� for any possible root
pruning or other issues that may arise.
The trees selected for the parking lot are Raywood Ash (Fraxinus oxycarpa `Raywood'), a nicely
structured tree growing to approximately 25' wide and 35' high. They are deciduous fast growers
with purple-red fatl color and are widely accepted as street and parking lot trees.
Along the South property line, where a drainage swale is proposed, we will plant groupings of
Vine Maples (Acer circinatum) interspersed with three Sweet Bay Magnolias (Magnolia virginiana).
The Vine Maples are native to our region and will help loosen the rigidity of the parking lot The
Magnolias are relatively small at approximately 20' wide and 35' high. They are semi-deciduous
and display creamy-white fragrant flowers in summer. Like the Maples they are adaptable to wet
soils.
Our street tree selection, Akebono Flowering Cherries (Prunus yedoensis 'Akebono'), grow to
approximately 25' in width and height, They are to be placed on the private property side, 6' in
from the sidewalk. This is in keeping with the street tree planting to the North of our site where
London Plane Trees are located at about 5' in from the sidewalk. As you are aware, the par�Cing
strip along this section of 98Lh Avenue is relatively narrow and the power lines seem quite low.
For these reasons, we feel it makes sense to continue the planting srandard set at the northerly
propeny. It is unfortunate that the utility company has unnecessarily overcut the Plane Trees
along the street side. Our selection and placing of the flowering cherries should not have to meet
that fate.
Please contact me if you have any questions or comments.
Sincerely,
q N
ul'a . Lu ,�
pe i
. � � ;
. .��`' T�l��_ COLLIER
.� _
� "„��%;�y"�4 ARBOR CARE
L-'fii�i►•oxrfrentally Friertdl}�...Sirtce 1937
11814 SE Jennifer St., Clackamas, OR 9701�
June 6, ?003
Mr. Jim Mille�•
Zaik and Miller Ar�hitects
23=�0 N W Tht�rman
Portland. Or 97210
Rc: �Tree protection plaii for the Ti��ard Chut•cli of� God. 1�670 SW 9g��, A��e. Tigard,
Orcgon.
Dear Mr. Miller
At ��our rec�uest, I e�amined selected t►•ees at the abo��c site �ti�ith Julia Lundy. Landscape
Architect, on 6/0?!?00�. I am to ���ake recommendations as to ���hich of the selected trees
are ��ood candidates to retain in the lanc�scape ���ith respect to tl�e proposed construction of
a ne��� building on lhe site. I did not examine e��er�� tree on the site. only those within 50-
feet of proposed constrtiction. I ���ill pro��ide a tree preservation plan to help protect the
trees desi��nated tor preser��ation durin�� construction. Tree Protection Zones �tiill he
established b� ch�llll-Iltl�i t�11C111�� around the U•ees to remain. 1 am basin� m} report on
m} tielci obser�°ations and tl�e pi•eliminar� site plan provided me.
OBSERVATIONS
T11ere are a nuit�ber of lar��e Dou�las tir trees (P.suc�clo�.��ugu men_ic�.s�ii) on the site ncar t11e
ne�� huildin�� construction. In ��ai•ticulac there are �8. 33 and 38-inch diameter tirs near
�i�here the ne�� buildin�� «�ill be constructed. T11e lar�,e �8-inch fir is approximately� 20-
feet ti•oil� the east �vall of tlle building and 14-16-feet ii•om the co�lcrete terrace. Thc ri�ees
visually appear to be in good health condition. elhibitin� normal �1e��� �rowth a»d f�ill �
C CO\�115.
� D[SCUSSION
One of the bcst m�thods for preservin� trees is sa��in� trees in broups or �roves. 'This
allo���s for preser��ation of large �ireas for tree roots. This gives the tree the� best chance at
lon�-tcrm s��rvi��aL Try�ing to pt•eserve si�lgle trees between buildings is usiiall}� i�ot
successful due to iula��oidable construction conflicts and grade chan�.:cs. Preservin�� the
��ro��e of tirs east of the ne�� building is a good e�ample.
YortlancL �03-??2_'267 V'ancotnrer: 360-69i-60�C, Faa: �03-7Z3-»�1 tVcb: �ti���-w•.rollicr.trbor.com
. • � :
Church of God Tree Protection Plan Pa��e 2 of 5
GRADING ANU CONSTRUCTION AFFECTS ON TREES
Gradin� and trenching can ne�ati��ely affect the health and anchorage of a tree's root
S�Stelll. TI'tI1Cllltl� for utilities can se��er roots resulting in loss of anchoring roots and
increase ���ind t1�ro�� potential. Cuttin� the roots results in the loss of the ability for the
tree to abso►•b w�ater and nutrients. Substanti�tl root loss decreases the potential for t11e
trees� long-term sur��i�al or e�entually may cause death. Lo���erin`� ��rades results in the
remo��al of roots. raisin�� grades leads to root suffocation. As little as 6-inches of soil fill
can e��entually suffocate roots and cause tree death, or allo�� root rots to invade and cause
root deca��. �
There is a potential foi• a fe�� roots of the �8-inch diameter tir to be cut near the ne��
biiildin� construction. Because the btiildin`� is approzimatel}� 20-teet from the tree and
the rest of the U•c:e's root s}�stem is lar��el} unaffected there is a high potential for
successt�ul tree preser��ation. It is recon�mcnded that the root system he e�amined near the
ne« buildin�� construction usin`� an air spade to c�aluate thc potential effects of
ronstruction and to elean cut an�� lar��e ro��ts o��er ?-inches in diai��etei� that n�a�� contlict
���lth C011Sli'11Ct1011.
:�IITIG:�T10\ OF C01STll[`CTI01 .aFFECTS O\ TREES
Theee are Se�'eC�i� if:C�1171C1U�S t01' 111111�11111`� and pre�entin�,: construction affects on trees
(s�e �lppendix 1 Tr�e Preser�atiun Speci f ications). Some of these include:
� I�stablish a tree protection zoile w�itkl protective chain link fencing, as dicected b}� tlle
consulti�Ig arborist. to preser�e root s�stems. This prohibits trenchin��. tradin`�. and
other co�lstructio�l acti��ities ���itl�in the tree p►-otection zone ���ithout stiper��ision of the
consulting arborist. See co»str�iction plan detail for tree fencin�, locations.
• �'hen trenching for utilities and/or irri��atio►i lines is ►•eqtiired, either route outside t11e
tree protection zone or tunnel under roots to preser�e them instead of cutting roots.
• Us� an air-spade tool to e�ca��ate a trench ne�t to ���Ilere the te�race a��d the east ���all
of the new building ���ill be constructed, to identity potential root conflicts ���ith
constructiou. Roots lar��er than 2-inches in diameter and larger should be cican cut
��ith a sharp saw to pre�ent later dama�e b�� construction.
YROTECTIVF. FENC[NG
Placement of protecti��e fencin� to �stablish a "I�ree Protection Zon� (TPZ) is one �f the
ke�� in�redients for successful tre� preservation. The tree protection zone a»d iencing
�Collier Arbor Care. Inc. 6'6'�003
. - ;
Church of God"I�ree Protection Plan Pa��e 3 of 5
shall be set b�� tlle consultin�� arborist in an effort to retain t11e trees �vith the greatest
chance of lon� term sur��ival ��ithout unduly increasin� the hazard potential and
ina�imizin� t11e tcees long term sur��i��al. A trec protectio�l plan sho«�ing the placeitlent of
the fencing shall be submitted in the construction plan details.
CONCLUSION
The tree preser��ation plan takes into consideration sa��ing the ma�imum nu�nbec of the
healthiest trees that ha�•e the hi�hest chancc of sur��i��al and do not pose an unreasonable
risk of damage to people and sti-tictures. The la►-�e �8-i�ICh fir and the rest of the protected
tree gro��e are good candidates fo►- p►-eser�°ation.
REC011�IE\1DATIONS
• , Impleil�ent the �I�rec Presc:����atioi� Plan (AE�pendix #1) u��der t11e stiper��ision of tl�e
consultin� arborist.
• T11e consultin�� ai•borist shall establish a �I�ree Protection Lone �ti�ith protecti��e chain
link tencin`� to pceser�c: root s�stems. [nclude in the consU•uction plan documents a
sheet outlinin�� the tree protectiu�l pfan and tlle location of the protecti��e fencin`� and
the Tcee Prutection lones.
• L�'se an air-spa�ie tool to exca��ate a trench nest to �chere the terrace and the east ���all �
of the ne�� buildin� ��ill be constructed, to identify potential root contlicts ���ith
CO11StCLlCl1011.
Care llas been taken to obtain all information froil� reliable sources. All data has been
��eritied insofar as possiblc; 11o���e�°er. the arborist can neither guarantee nor be
responsible for tlle acc�iracy of information provided by otl�ers. 7'he infor�l�ation
contained in this report reflects the condition of tho5e items at the time of inspection.
There is no ��arranh or �ttarantee. e�pressed or implied, that problems or deficiencies of
the trees in question ma�� not arise in the future.
Please contact me if you ha��e am furthec questions.
Res ectfully subt»itted:
, � : ..
'J� ��-,�,�'� ����'��
,,>-
Terrill Collier
Consulting Arborist
Certi�ied �rhorist #PN 0101
Appendiz #l: "I�rec Protectiun Specitications
�O'Collier Arbor Care. Inc. 6'6/3003
_ �
Church of God �i�ree Protection Plan Pa��e 4 of�
A����r�n�x #i
TRI;I? YROTCCT[ON SPF:C[FICATIONS
I3uildin�� C��nstruct�ion
1. �The buildin`� contractor and all sub contractors in��ol��ed «ith site ��ork arotind trees
such as ��radin��. utilities. buildin��. landscapin��. etc. are rec�uired to mcet ��ith the
consultin� arborist at the site prior to b��innin� ��ork to revie�v all ��ork procedures,
access and haul routes, and tree protection measures.
2. Establisll a Tree Protection lone as directed b�� the consulting arborist to }�rotect and
pi•eser��e the tree and it�s root s}�stem. ]nstall temporai-}� protecti��e cllain linl: i�encing
to estahlish a Tree Protection Lone. Place the protecti�e fencin`� around t11e ed�c: of
thc dcip line (the area belo��� tl�e sprea�l c>l� the branches) ol� th� tree. For U'ees �ith
narro��� �,ro���th habit, the Trce Protection 7,one estends beyond the dcip line and the
fencing shall be placed und�r direction of� th� cons�iltin� aeborist. T'ree Protection
"l.ones ��ill be established pri��r to constcuction.
�. Construction acti�ities ��ithin thc 1�rcc Protection Zoile are prollibitecl e�cept by
permission and super��ision of�the consultin� arborist.
� -�. Protect the tree a���inst cuttin�" skini�in;� or breakin�� of branches, trunk and roots.
�. Stocl:piling of matzrials. ���hicle operation_ and parking is prohibited in the Tree
Protectiou 7one.
6. Maintain ezisting grade ���ithin the Tree Protection Zone. Raising or lo��erin� �radzs
are prohibited e�cept as permitted b} aild under tlle supen ision of the consultin��
arboeist.
7. R�mo��al 01� beanches o►• ro�t �runin`� of trees to remain is to be pertormed b�� a
c�ualified arhorist under the super��ision of the consultin�� arborist.
8. P►•iini�l`�. Trees slial l be pruned prior to the start of construction. Trees shall be cro��n
cleaned to re�1�o��e the dead��ood ? inches in diameter and o��er. Trees shall be cro��n
tlli��ned by 10-20%. Under the direction oi� the consulting arborist cro���ns i1�ay be
1'f1lS�d h�' 1'l:1110�']Il�� bottom branches as necessar� up to 14 feet high to gi��e clearance
for any constructio�l activities, traftic, etc. All «�ork to bc do�le in accorda»ce �r�itli
ANSI A300 pruninb standards.
9. Cut branchrs and roots ��ith sharp prunin� instruments that do not chop or tear.
10. F.zca��ation and trenching around tre� roots ���ithin the Tree P2'Ot�'CUOIl Zone is
prohibited e�cept by permissio�� �nd under the super��ision of the consultin�� arhorist.
C�Collicr Arbor Care, Inc. 6'6/2003
, . . ,
Church of God Tree Protection Plan Pa��e 5 of 5
l l. When trenchin�� is �•equir�d ���ithin thr �I�rce Protection Zone, tui�nel under roots by
hacld di��in�. Do not cut roots lar���r than 2 inches in diameter. Cut smaller roots
onl�� if they interfere ���ith ne��� ���o�•k and onl�� �ti�ith a sharp instrun�ent.
12. Do not allo��� an�� exposed or ct�t roots to drv out before permanent backfill is placed.
Pro��ide a temporar}� ea�•th co��er ur mulch t�� keep exposed roots moist until
permanent backfilf is placcd.
1�. Atly dama�e to ri�ees durin�� constructio►1 acti��ities shall be repo►-ted to the consultin�
arborist ���ithin 6 hours so that remecjial action can be taken. Timeliness is critical to
the tree health.
l4. Water trees to reinain, as necessar�� to maintain their health during the course of
COl1S1ClICt1011.
l>. l�crtilizing. The trees shall be subsurface fertilii�d ���ith a complete slow� release
fertilizer and a root stitliulaut to E�rorliote ��ood hcalth and vi�o�•. Initial fertilizing
should be don� prior to startin�� of thc constructi��n and continue annuallv for at least
-, "
� ��ears.
l6. Contractor is responsible tor an�� and all dama;�e to the tree durin�= the course of
constructio�l. ��he contr�ictor shall �a�� to the U-ee o�ti�ner the ��alue of tlie damaged tree
as �stfthI15I1t;C� h� T�lf: COIISU�tlll�� arbc�rist.
�Collier Arbor Care, Inc. GI6%2003
_ ,�
03/19/200a 12:48 FAX SOJ5981980 CITY OF TIGARD �002
. �
PRE-APPLICAT(ON
CONF�RENCE REC�UEST
CITY OF TIGARD 13925 SW Hal!Bfvd., Tigard, OR 97223(503) 639-4171 FAX�(503) 684-7297
GENERAL INFQRMATION
FOR STAFF USE ONLY
Applicant: T J�M M���,e <4/�
ZAIK/MI�.LEk k550�IstTE�— ' ,
Address:�340 NW 7Nu�t�fhlV�Sult� Phone: 503-2ZZ-91$$ Case No.: `L �� 3 -�vo z-3
2d/ �
c�ty: Po�e�t�A�ft� _z�P: q 72lD Receipt No.: �-��� — 12-3�i
Application Accepted B : �
Contact Person: �1�4GK1� 12qpT phone: 50 3-ZZZ- 9158 �/3��U
Date: � �,
Property Owner/Deed Holder(s): 71l�AlCl� C�I UI�Gf�I D� bdV y � Q 3
D'ATE OF PRE-APP.:
� I 5�70 SW 9�t� AV�U� 7lliAK17 � 9722� TIME OF PRE-APP.:�. �v '.�`'
Address: Phone: .Sa3-(e,39-�f0 pRE-APP.HELD WITH-
City: Tlb/F12G� 01�2 Zip: 9 72Zy Re�.�nnooz �'lturpinlrtwst9rsl�evlae4lPre
.AppRequestdoc
Prop6rty Address/Location(s}: �b��D Gf(U/ZL� oF GOD
I 5(0 70 SkI q8 T� �V�NU� , rlbA��. OlZ. REQU(RED SUBMITTAL ELEMENTS
7 Zy (Note: applications will not be aCtepted
without the required submittat eiements)
Tax Map&Tax Lot#(s):
Zoning: _�-7 ❑ Pre-Applicatlon Conf. Request Form
Site Size: 395 5� x ?OD SF
2 COPIES EACH OF 7HE FOLLOWING:
❑ Brief Description of the Proposal and
any slie-specific questions/issues that
P�PPLICATION CONFERENCE INFORMATION you would like to have staff research
prior to the meeting.
All of the i�formation identified on ihls form are required to be ,
submitted by the applicant and received by the Planning Division a ❑ Slie Plan. The site plan must show the
minimum of one (1) week prior t_o oKcially scheduling a proposed lots end/or building layouts I
pre-application conferenGe__date/time to allow staff ample time to drawn to scale. Also, show the IoCation
prepare for the meeting. of the subject properly in relation to the
nearest streets; and the locations of
A pre-application conference can usualfy be scheduled withln 1-2 drtveways on the subjeet property and
weeks of the Planning Dlvlsion's receipt of the request for either across the street. �
Tyesday or Thursdav mornin4s. P�e-application conferences are ❑ The Proposed Uses.
one (1) hour lonq and are typicafly held betwee� the hours of � Topographic InformaGon. Include
�_1 i:00 AM.
Contour Lines if P�ssible.
PRE-APPLICATfON CONFERENCES MUST BE SCH�DULED IN ❑ (f the Pre-Applicaiion Conference is for a I
PERSON AT THE COMMUNlTY[3E1/ELOPMEN7 COUNTER FROM MONOPOIE project, fhe applicant must
8:00-4:00lMONDAY-FRIDAY. attach a copy of the letter and proof in
the form of an affidavit of mailing, that
IF MORE THAN 4 PEOPLE ARE EXPECTED TO ATTEND THE the collocatfon protocot was completed
PRE.APPLICATION CONFERENCE IN YOUR GROUP, PLEASE (see Section 18.798.080 of the Tigard ;
INFORM THE CITY IN ADVANCE SO THAT ALTERNATE ROOM Community Development Code). '
ARRANGEMENTS CAN BE MADE TO ACCOMMODATE 7FiE � Filing Fee$200.00
GROUP.
i
PRE-APPLICATION STATEMENT
PROPOSAL:
Tigard Church of God is located on 98th Avenue just north of Durham
Road. The current Church building was constructed in 1978 and due to a recent
increase in membership, the Church has outgrown the existing office space. The
Church projects this growth to continue into the future. Phase I is a new
Administration building which includes; offices, a conference room, common
area, a reception and waiting area, and work and break room. The building will
meet today's need for additional space and is designed to house additional staff
in the future. The new Administration building is 2875 SF. Phase II would include
remodeling of the existing building which is not scheduled until 2004.
Questions:
1. The original drawings of the Church that date from 1978 show a cast iron
sanitary sewer line running from the existing Church southeast to SW
Brentwood and tying in. Is this correct? What is the depth of this sewer
line?
2. Our proposed civil drawing shows roof drainage running down through
roof drains into a 6" pvc pipe which runs under the existing parking lot into
a new drainage swale on the south side of this property. Is this system of
drainage ok?
PROPOSED USE:
The new Administration building will be used to manage the daily workings
of the Church. The proposed use of the new Administration building includes;
offices for the Pastor, Associate Pastor and one full time staff member, also
included a conference room, a common open area to house volunteers helping
with the weekly mailings etcetera, a reception and waiting area, a workroom with
storage and copier, and a break room with a refrigerator and microwave. There
are two bathrooms, two mechanical rooms, a janitor's closet and storage spaces.
A small brick wall on the south side screens garbage, and air conditioning units.
There are three entrances. The main entry is to the south, an entry to the north
connects the new building to the existing Church, and an east entry for staff
adjoins the existing parking lot. There is a small outdoor terrace at this location
as well. The new Administration building will be able to house additional
employees, as the church continues to grow. This building is designed to
anticipate the needs of the Church and staff not only today, but in year's to come.
Tigard Church of God — Proposed New Administration Building
Zaik/Miller Associates March 2003
r
PRE-APPLICATION CONFERENCE NOTES
➢ ENGIHEERIHG SECTION Q �omry'nng D O(Dp�nr
Sfutping A Better Community
PUBLIC FACILITIES Tax Map[al: 2s»>co
Tax lot[sl: 300
Use lyme: Church Expansion
The extent of necessary public improvements and dedications which shall be required of the applicant
will be recommended by City staff and subject to approval by the appropriate authority. There will be
no final recommendation to the decision making authority on behalf of the City staff until all concerned
commenting agencies, City staff and the public have had an opportunity to review and comment on
the application. The following comments are a projection of public improvement related requirements
that may be required as a condition of development approval for your proposed project.
Right-of-way dedication:
The City of Tigard requires that land area be dedicated to the public:
(1.) To increase abutting public rights-of-way to the ultimate functional street classification
right-of-way width as specified by the Community Development Code; or
(2.) For the creation of new streets.
Approval of a development application for this site will require right-of-way dedication for:
� SW 98`�Avenue to 27 feet from centerline (Neighborhood Route w/bike lanes)
❑ SW to feet
❑ SW to feet
❑ SW to feet
Street improvements:
� Partial street improvements will be necessary along SW 98`h Avenue, to include:
❑ feet of pavement
❑ concrete curb
❑ storm sewers and other underground utilities
❑ -foot concrete sidewalk
� street trees spaced per TDC standards.
❑ street signs, traffic control devices, streetlights and a two-year streetlight fee.
CITII OF T16AR� Pre-Applfcatl�n C�Merence Notes Pago 1 ot 6
Eqln�rly�����nt 5�etln
• • ❑ Other:
❑ street improvements will be necessary along SW , to include:
❑ feet of pavement
❑ concrete curb
❑ storm sewers and other underground utilities
❑ -foot concrete sidewalk
❑ street trees
❑ street signs, traffic control devices, streetlights and a two-year streetlight fee.
❑ Other:
❑ street improvements will be necessary along SW , to include:
❑ feet of pavement
❑ concrete curb
❑ storm sewers and other underground utilities
❑ -foot concrete sidewalk
❑ street trees
❑ street signs, traffic control devices, streetlights and a two-year streetlight fee.
❑ Other:
❑ street improvements will be necessary along SW , to include:
❑ feet of pavement
❑ concrete curb
❑ storm sewers and other underground utilities
❑ -foot concrete sidewalk
❑ street trees
❑ street signs, traffic control devices, streetlights and a two-year streetlight fee.
❑ Other:
❑ street improvements will be necessary along SW , to include:
❑ feet of pavement
❑ concrete curb
❑ storm sewers and other underground utilities
❑ -foot concrete sidewalk
CITY YF T16ARD Pre-Appllcstl�n Comer�nce N�tes Page 2 of 6
E�th��Hq��p�rtmspt Sactl��
• � ❑ street trees
❑ street signs, traffic control devices, streetlights and a two-year streetlight fee.
❑ Other:
Agreement for Future Street Improvements:
In some cases, where street improvements or other necessary public improvements are not currently
practical, the improvements may be deferred. In such cases, a condition of development approval
may be specified which requires the property owner(s) to provide a future improvement guarantee.
The City Engineer will determine the form of this guarantee. The following street improvements may
be eligible for such a future improvement guarantee:
(1.)
�2•)
Overhead Utility Lines:
� Section 18.810.120 of the Tigard Municipal Code (TMC) requires all overhead utility lines
adjacent to a development to be placed underground or, at the election of the developer, a
fee in-lieu of undergrounding can be paid. This requirement is valid even if the utility lines
are on the opposite side of the street from the site. If the fee in-lieu is proposed, it is equal to
$ 27.50 per lineal foot of street frontage that contains the overhead lines.
There are existing overhead utility lines which run adjacent to this site along SW 98th Avenue.
Prior to final inspection, the applicant shall either place these utilities underground, or pay
the fee in-lieu described above.
Sanitary Sewers:
The nearest sanitary sewer line to this property is a(n) 8 inch line which is located in Brentwood Place
to the east. City maps show this line has been extended to the east boundarv of this site. However,
there are no asbuilts available for the last segment of sewer line. Based upon the asbuilt information
we do have, we can estimate that the depth of the cleanout at the church boundarv is approximately
four feet deep. The proposed development must be connected to a public sanitary sewer. It is the
developer's responsibility to provide a suitable connection for the new building addition.
Water Supply:
The City of Tiqard (Phone:(503) 639-4171) provides public water service in the area of this site. This
service provider should be contacted for information regarding water supply for your proposed
development.
Fire Protection:
CITY OF TI6ARD Pre-Applicatl�n C�meronc�Ne[es Page 3 of 6
�.�i.•.n.��.r�roo.n a•en..
. �ualatin Valley Fire and R� ae District (South Division) [Cont� Eric McMullen, (503) 612-7010]
provides fire protection sero�ces within the City of Tigard. The Oistrict should be contacted for
information regarding the adequacy of circulation systems, the need for fire hydrants, or other
questions related to fire protection.
Storm Sewer Improvements:
All proposed development within the City shall be designed such that storm water runoff is conveyed
to an approved public drainage system. The applicant will be required to submit a proposed storm
drainage plan for the site, and may be required to prepare a sub-basin drainage analysis to ensure
that the proposed system will accommodate runoff from upstream properties when fully developed.
Onsite defention will be required if the net increase in impervious area exceeds 5,000 sf.
Storm Water Quality:
The City has agreed to enforce Surface Water Management (SWM) regulations established by the
Unified Sewerage Agency (USA) (Resolution and Order No. 00-7) which requires the construction of
on-site water quality facilities. The facilities shall be designed to remove 65 percent of the phosphorus
contained in 100 percent of the storm water runoff generated from newly created impervious surfaces.
The resolution contains a provision that would allow an applicant to pay a fee in-lieu of constructing
an on-site facility provided specific criteria are met. The City will use discretion in determining whether
or not the fee in-lieu will be offered. If the fee is allowed, it will be based upon the amount of new
impervious surfaces created; for every 2,640 square feet, or portion thereof, the fee shall be $210.
Preliminary sizing calculations for any proposed water quality facility shall be submitted with the
development application. It is anticipated that this project will require:
� Construction of an on-site water quality facility.
❑ Payment of the fee in-lieu.
Other Comments:
All proposed sanitary sewer and storm drainage systems shall be designed such that City
maintenance vehicles will have unobstructed access to critical manholes in the systems. Maintenance
access roadways may be required if existing or proposed facilities are not otherwise readily
accessible.
raffr impa port is quired e su itte � fh lan e plicatio �-
4�B�O�
TRAFFIC IMPACT FEES
In 1990, Washington County adopted a county-wide Traffic Impact Fee (TIF) ordinance. The Traffic
Impact Fee program collects fees from new development based on the development's projected
impact upon the City's transportation system. The applicant shall be required to pay a fee based upon
CITY OF TI6ARD Pro-AppliCatl�n ColdErenCO Nates Page 4�f 6
��i...d�����.ru.na•cu•■
� �he number of trips which a �rojected to result from the propos ievelopment. The calculation of
the TIF is based on the proposed use of the land, the size of the pro�ect, and a general use based fee
category. The TIF shall be calculated at the time of building permit issuance. In limited
circumstances, payment of the TIF inay be allowed to be deferred until the issuance of an occupancy
permit. Deferral of the payment until occupancy is permissible o� when the TIF is greater than
$5,000.00.
Pay TIF for increase in building size.
PERMITS
Public Facilitv Improvement (PFI) Permit:
Any work within a public right-of-way in the City of Tigard requires a PFI permit from the Engineering
Department. A PFI permit application is available at the Planning/Engineering counter in City Hall.
For more extensive work such as street widening improvements, main utility line extensions or
subdivision infrastructure, plans prepared by a registered professional engineer must be submitted for
review and approval.
The Engineering Department fee structure for this permit is considered a cost recovery system. A
deposit is collected with the application, and the City will track its costs throughout the life of the
permit, and will either refund any remaining portion of the deposit, or invoice the Permittee in cases
where City costs exceeds the deposit amount. The Permittee will also be required to post a
performance bond, or other such suitable security. Where professional engineered plans are
required, the Permittee must execute a Developer/Engineer Agreement, which will obligate the design
engineer to perform the primary inspection of the public improvement construction work. The PFI
permit fee structure is as follows:
NOTE: If an PFI Permit is required,the applicant must obiain that
permit prior to release of any permits from the Building Diuision.
Buildinq Division Permits:
The following is a brief overview of the type of permits issued by the Building Division. For a more
detailed explanation of these permits, please contact the Development Services Counter at
503-639-4171, ext. 304.
Site Improvement Permit (SIT). This permit is generally issued for all new commercial,
industrial and multi-family projects. This permit will also be required for land partitions where lot
grading and private utility work is required. This permit covers all on-site preparation, grading
and utility work. Home builders will also be required to obtain a SIT permit for grading work in
cases where the lot they are working on has slopes in excess of 20% and foundation
excavation material is not to be hauled from the site.
Building Permit (BUP). This permit covers only the construction of the building and is issued
after, or concurrently with, the SIT permit.
CIT11 OF TI6AR� Pre-Appltcatlen C�Meronce N�tes Page 5 of 6
E�lI.•.d0�9qutm•�t s.ctla
• • - Master Permit (MST; 'iis permit is issued for all single ar �ulti-family buildings. It covers all
work necessary for bu�iding construction, including sub-traaes (excludes grading, etc.). This
permit can not be issued in a subdivision until the public improvements are substantially
complete and a mylar copy of the recorded plat has been returned by the applicant to the City.
For a land partition, the applicant must obtain an Engineering Permit, if required, and return a
mylar copy of the recorded plat to the City prior to issuance of this permit.
Other Permits. There are other special permits, such as mechanical, electrical and plumbing
that may also be required. Contact the Development Services Counter for more information.
GRADING PLAN REQUIREMENTS FOR SUBDIVISIONS
All subdivision projects shall require a proposed grading plan prepared by the design engineer. The
engineer will also be required to indicate which lots have natural slopes between 10% and 20%, as
well as lots that have natural slopes in excess of 20%. This information will be necessary in
determining if special grading inspections will be required when the lots develop. The design engineer
will also be required to shade all structural fill areas on the construction plans. In addition, each
homebuilder will be required to submit a specific site and floor plan for each lot. The site plan shall
include topographical contours and indicate the elevations of the corners of the lot. The builder shall
also indicate the proposed elevations at the four corners of the building.
PREPARED BY: - � � J�
ENGIN � N EPART ENT STAFF ATE
Phone: [5031639-4111
Fax: [50316240152
i�.\eng5bnanr5templateslpreap notes-eng.dot
Revised: March 21,2002
CITY OF TI6ARD Pre-Applicatlan CoMeronce Notes Page 6�f 6
E��lo��rl�!�e�uuaentSeetl��
-� �
Gi. . l : CITY �F TIGARD fi �� F -� _ =
PRE-APPLICATION CUNfERENCE NOTES �o m°�;�pn��p� ��
Sfmjiin��!�13rllzr�'ammuntty
� (Pre-Application Meeting Notes are Yalid for Six (b) Months}
_ . ,_- . . j_. �
NON-RESIDENTIAL
a�r�n,�o�
� n�
��vr�a�_ �.�t-� 1 iGARD ��-�urc,� a} �o�
APPLICANT: ��,��1�,e �o-r I,� �, (`�1.11�� 1 F AGENT:
Phone: (�c�j '.�i;.- ����� Phone: O
PROPERTY LOCATION: /y
ADDRESS/GENERAL LO(ATION: I`�(;�" J L=J ('i�,��' i1�,;�,�;;;�'
TAX MAP(S�/LOT #(S): St 11G� - p(�30�
NECESSARYAPPLICATIONS: C�� 4�c�S�,�,�e ��, uo� (ti���'�:`�',c �,i,�.�
PROPOSALDESCRIPTION: �op6s�,t_ -}n C2C�c� Q ��.,�'lS ,� �.xl�ans,dr� r��-J ��v�f-
�m,��e l
COMPREHENSIVE PLAN
MAP DESIGNATION: �f��,�'�n, ��c�,S,z�. ���,�E?�A�_
ZONING MAP DESIGNATION: R°�
�
CITIZEN INVOLVEMENT TEAM(C.I.T.)AREA: ��U�'�
ZONIN6 DISTRICT DIMENSIONAL REQUIREMENTS [Refer to Code Section 18. � �`� ) �r� �� 1 c6 •J�. `�r���}J
MINIMUM LOT SIZE:�� sq_ ft. Average Min. lot width: -. ft. Max. building height: 3c ft.
SeWacks: Front �' ft. Side � ft. Rear - ft. Corner " ft. from street.
MAXIMUM SITE COVERAGE: �% Minimum landscaped or natural vegetation area: ���� %.
NEIGHBORHOOU MEETIN6 [Refer to the Neighbor600d Meeting Nandoutl
THE APPLICANT SHALL NOTIFY ALL PROPERTY OWNERS WITHIN 500 FEET, THE MEMBERS
OF ANY LAND USE SUBCOMMITTEE(S), AND THE CITY OF TIGARD PLANNING DIVISION of
their proposal. A minimum of two (2) weeks between the mailing date and the meeting date is
required. Please review the Land Use Notification handout concerning site posting and the meeting
notice. Meetinq is to be held prior to submittinq your application or the application will not be
accepted.
* NOTE: In order to also preliminarily address building code standards, a meeting with a Plans
Examiner is encou�aged prior to submittal of a land use application.
CITY OF TIGARO Pre-Application Conference Notes Page 1 of 8
Nori-�es��a�«,mi�,��y oN�s�seceon
�, ,
[Vf NARRATIYE [Refer ta Code Chapter 18.3901
The APPLICANT SHALL SUBMiT A NARRATIVE which provides findings based on the applicable
approval standards. Failure to provide a narrative o�adequately address criteria would be reason to
consider an application incomplete and delay review of the proposal. The applicant should review
the code for applicable criteria.
[v� IMPACT STUOY [Refer to Code Secbons 18.390.040 and 18.390.0501
As a part of the APPLICATION SUBMITTAL REQUIREMENTS, applicants are required to INCLUDE
IMPACT STUDY with their submittal package. The impact study shall quantify the effect of the
development on public facilities and services. The study shall address, at a minimum, the
transportation system, including bikeways, the drainage system, the parks system, the water system,
the sewer system and the noise impacts of the development. For each public facility system and type
of impact, the study shall propose improvements necessary to meet City standa�ds, and to minimize
the impact of the development on the public at large, public facilities systems, and affected private
property use�s. In situations where the Community Development Code requi�es the dedication of real
property interests, the applicant shall either specifically concur with the dedication requi�ement, or
provide evidence which supports the conclusion that the real prope�ty dedication requirement is not
roughly propo�tional to the projected impacts of the development.
[7f ACCESS [Refer te Chapters 18.T05 aad 18.76 1
Minimum number of accesses: I � Minimum access width: ���1 �0
Minimum pavement width: ,r�
All driveways and par{cing areas, except for ome fleet storage parking areas, must be paved.
Drive-in use queuing areas:
[�WALKWAY REQUIREMENTS [Refer te Code Secdon 18.705.0301
WALKWAYS SHALI. EXTEND FROM THE GROUND FLOOR ENTRANCES OR FROM THE
GROUND FLOOR LANDING OF STAIRS, ramps, or elevators of all commercial, institutional, and
industrial uses, to the st�eets which provide the required access and egress. Walkways shall provide
convenient connections between buildings in multi-building commercial, institutional, and industrial
complexes. Unless impractical, walkways should be constructed between a new development and
neighboring developments.
❑ SPECIAL SETBACKS [Refer to Code Chapte 8.7301
➢ STREETS: feet fr m the centerline of
➢ LOWER INTENSITY ZON feet, along the site's boundary.
➢ FLAG LOT: 10-FOOT S E YARD SETBACK.
❑ SPECIAL BUILDIN6 HEIGHT PROYISIONS�efer te Code Section 18.730.010.B.1
BUILDING HEIGHT EXCEPTIO S - Buildings located in a non-residential zone may be built to a
height of 75 feet provided that: �
➢ A maximum building floor area to site area ratio (FAR) of 1.5 to 1 will exist;
➢ All actual building setba,�lcs will be at least half('/z)of the building's height; and
➢ The structure will not abut a residential zoned district.
� BUfFERING AND SCREENIN6 [Refer to Code Chapter 18.7451
In order TO INCREASE PRIVACY AND TO EITHER REDUCE OR ELIMINATE ADVERSE N01SE
OR VISUAL IMPACTS between adjacent developments, especially between different land uses, the
City requires landscaped buffer areas along certain site perimeters. Required buffer areas are
described by the Code i� terms of width. Buffer areas must be occupied by a mixture of deciduous
and evergreen trees and shrubs and must afso achieve a balance between vertical and horizontal
plantings. Site obscuring screens or fences may also be required; these are often advisable even if
not required by the Code. The required buffer areas may onlv be occupied by vegetation, fences,
utilities, and walkways. Additional information on required buffer area mate�ials and sizes may be
found in the Development Code.
CITY OF TIGARD Pre-Application Conference Notes Page 2 of 8
NON�tesidential AppFrationlPlamm�g Divisan SecOon
I
�I
The ESTIMATED REQUIRED BUFFER WIDTHS applicable to your proposal area are�
Vt,:.��, i�' ��� feet along north boundary. 'v'^=•�t>5 � "��� ' feet along east boundary.
--- feet along south boundary_ �f{� F�s �� �- <�� ' feet along west boundary.
IN ADOITION, SIGHT OBSCURING SCREENING IS REQUIRED ALONG: 'p����. ,�� ���-�- v
[�LANDSCAPING [Refer to Code Chapters 18.745,1a.765 apd 18.7051
STREET TREES ARE REQUIRED FOR ALL DEVELOPMENTS FRONTING ON A PUBLIC OR
PRIVATE STREET as weli as driveways which a�e more than 100 feet in length. Street trees must
be placed either within the public right-of-way or on private property within six (6) feet of the right-of-
way boundary_ Street trees must have a minimum caliper of at least two {2) inches when measured
four (4) feet above g�ade. Street trees should be spaced 20 to 40 feet apa�t depending on the
b�anching width of the proposed tree species at maturity. Fu�ther information on regulations
affecting street trees may be obtained from the Planning Division.
A MINIMUM OF ONE (1) TREE FOR EVERY SEVEN (7) PARKING SPACES MUST BE PLANTED
in and around all parking areas in order to provide a vegetative canopy effect. Landscaped parking
areas shall include special design features which effectively screen the parking lot areas from view.
These design features may include the use of landscaped berms, deco�ative walls, and raised
planters.
�RECYCLING [Refer to Cede Chapt�r 18.7551
Applicant should CONTACT FRANCHISE HAULER FOR REVIEW AND APPROVAL OF SITE
SERVICING COMPATIBILITY. Locating a trash/recycling enclosure within a ctear vision area such
as at the intersection of two (2) driveways within a parking lot is prohibited. Much of Tigard is within
Pnde Disposal's Service a�ea. Lenny Hing is the contact person and can be reached at (503)
625-6177.
[� PARKING [Refer to Code Section 18.765.0401 r,
REQUIRED parking for this type of use: c_e � r p��r, �S cF�TS f
Parking SHOWN on preliminary plan{s): � y �
SECONDARY USE REQUIRED parking:
Parking SHOWN on preliminary plan(s):
NO MORE THAN 50% OF REQUIRED SPACES MAY BE DESIGNATED AND/OR DIMENSIONED
AS COMPACT SPACES.
PARKING STALLS shall be dimensioned as follows:
➢ Standard parking space dimensions: 8 feet, 6 inches x 18 feet, 6 inches.
➢ Compact parlcing space dimensions: 7 feet, 6 inches x 16 feet, 6 inches.
Note: Parking space width includes the width of a stripe that
separates the parking space from an adjoining space.
Note: A maximum of three(3)feet of the vehicle ovefiang area in fro�t of a wheel stop o�curb can
be included as part of required parki�g space depth. This area cannot be included as
landscaping for meeting the minimum percentage requirements.
HANDICAPPED PARKING:
➢ All parking areas shall PROVIDE APPROPRIATELY LOCATED AND DIMENSIONED
DISABLEO PERSON PARKING spaces. The minimum number of disabled person parking
spaces to be provided, as well as the parking stall dimensions, are mandated by the Americans
with Disabilities Act (ADA). A handout is available upon request. A handicapped parking space
symbol shall be painted on the parking space surface and an approp�iate sign shall be posted.
➢ BICYCLE RACKS ARE REQUIRED FOR MULTI-FAMILY, COMMERCIAL AND INDUSTRIAL
DEVELOPMENTS. Bicycle racks shall be located in areas protected from automobile traffic and
� in convenient locations.
[�LOADIN6 AREA REQUIREMENTS [Refer to Code Section 18.165.080)
Every COMMERCIAL OR INDUSTRIAL BUILDING IN EXCESS OF 10,000 SQUARE FEET shall be
provided with a loading space. The space size and location shall be as approved by the City
Engineer.
CIN OF TIGARD Pre-Application Conference Notes Page 3 of 8
NoN-R�sid�,ual appGcaa;onfPlaru�irg a�isa�,sectia,
[� BICYCLE RACKS [R�fer to Cade SectiOa 18.1651
BICYCLE RACKS are required FOR MULTI-FAMiLY, COMMERCIAL AND INDUSTRIAL
DEVELOPMENTS. Bicycle racks shall be located in areas protected from automobile t�affic and in
convenient locations. 1 /��r,,
❑ SENSInYE LANOS [Refer to Code Chapter 18.715)
The Code provides REGULATIONS FOR LANDS HICH ARE POTENTIALLY UNSUITABLE FOR
DEVELOPMENT DUE TO AREAS WITHIN THE 100-YEAR FLOODPLAIN, NATURAL
DRAINAGEWAYS, WETLAND AREAS, ON S PES IN EXCESS OF 25 PERCENT, OR ON
UNSTABLE GROUND. Staff will attempt to eliminary identify sensitive lands areas at the pre-
application confe�ence based on available inf rmation. HOWEVER, the responsibility to precisely
identif sensitive land areas and their bou daries is the res onsibilit of the a licant. Areas
meetin the definitions of sensitive lands ust be clearl indicated on lans submitted with the
development application.
,
Chapter 18.775 also provides regulations for the use, protection, or modification of sensitive lands
areas. RESIDENTIAL DEVELOPMENT IS PROHIBITED WITHIN FLOODPLAINS. �
❑ STEEP SIOPES [Refer to Code Secbon 18.115.080.0
When STEEP SLOPES exist, p�ior to is ance of a �nal order, a geotechnical report must be
submitted which addresses the app�ova standards of the Tigard Community Development Code
- Section 18.775.080.C. The repo�t shall e based upon field exploration and investigation and shall
` include specific recommendations for a�hieving the �equirements of Section 18.775.080.C.
CIfANWATER SERVICES[CWSI BUFFER STANDARDS [Refer to R a 0 96-44/USA Regulauons-Chapter 3)
LAND DEVELOPMENT ADJACENT TO SENSITIVE AREAS shall preserve and maintain or create a
vegetated coRidor for a buffe� wide enough to p�otect the water quality functioning of the sensitive
area.
Desi n Criteria:
The EGETATED CORRIDOR WIDTH is dependent on the sensitive area. The following table
identifies the required widths:
TA6LE 3.1 VEGETATED CORRIDOR WIDTHS
SOURCE: CWS DESIGN AND CONSTRUCTION STANDARDS MANUALJRESOLUTION 8� ORDER 96-44
� ' SLOPE ADJACENT W1DTH OF-VEGETATED '�
SENSITIVE AREAbEFINITION a s
� .
, _ : , �_.,_
' � � � JO SENSITIVE AREA CORRIDOR PER SIDE
♦ Strea�r�s with intermittent flow draining: <25%
1 10 to <50 acres 15 feet
1 >50 to <100 acres 25 feet
♦ Existing or created wetla�ds <0.5 acre 25 feet
• Existing or created wetlands >0.5 acre <25% 50 feet
• Rivers, streams, and springs with year-round flow
• Streams with intermittent flow draining >100 acres
• Natural lakes and onds
• Streams with intermittent flow draining: >25%
� 10 to <50 acres 30 feet
� >50 to <100 acres 50 feet
• Existing or created wetlands >25% Variable from 50-200 feet. Measu�e
• Rivers, streams, and springs with year-round flow in 25-foot increments from the starting
• Streams with intermittent flow draining >100 acres point to the top of ravine (break in
• Natural lakes and ponds <25%slope), add 35 feet past the top
of ravine6
StaRing point for measurement = edge of the defined channel (bankful flow) for streams/rivers, detineated weUand boundary, delineated spring
boundary, and/or average high water fo�lakes or ponds,whichever offers greatest resource protection. Intertnittent spri�gs, located a minimum of 15
feet within the river/stream or weUand vegetated corridor,shall not serve as a starfing point for measurement
SVegetated comdor averaging or reduction is allowed only when the vegetated corridor is certified to be in a marginal o�deg�aded condition.
6The vegetated comdor extends 35 feet from the top of the ravine and sets the outer boundary of the vegetated corridor. The 35 feet may be reduced to
15 feet,if a stamped geotechnical report confiRns slope stability shall be maintained with the reduced setbadc from the top of ravine.
CITY OF TIGARD Pre-Application Conference Notes Page 4 of 8
NON-Residential AppAcaGoi�JPlanning Division Secion '
Restnctions in the V etate CoRidor:
NO structures, deve opment, construction activities, gardens, lawns, application of chemicals,
dumping of any materials of any kind, or other activities shall be permitted which otherwise detract
from the water quality protection provided by the vegetated corridor, except as provided for in fhe
CWS Design and Construction Standards.
Location of Ve etated Corridor:
I ANY RESI ENTIAL DEVELOPMENT WHICH CREATES MULTIPLE PARCELS or lots intended
for separate ownershi�, such as a subdivision, the vegetated corridor shall be contained in a
separate tract, and shall not be a pa�t of any parcel to be used for the construction of a dwelling u�it.
� CWS Service Provider Letter:
PRIOR TO SUBMITTAL of any tand use applications, the applicant must obtain a CWS Service
Provider Letter which will outline the conditions necessary to comply with the R&O 96-44 sensitive
area req uirements. If there are no sensitive areas, CWS must still issue a letter stating a CWS
Service Provider Letter is not required.
[7�S16NS [Refer to Cede Chapter 18.7801
SIGN PERMITS MUST BE OBTAINED PRIOR TO INSTALLATION OF ANY SIGN in the City of
Tigard. A "Guidelines for Sign Permits" handout is available upon request. Additional sign area or
height beyond Code standards may be permitted if the sign proposal is reviewed as part of a
development review application. Alternatively, a Sign Code Exception application may be filed for
Director's review.
I
� TREE REMOYAI PLAN REQUIREMENTS [Refer ta Cade Section 18.790.030.CJ
A TREE PLAN FOR THE PLANTING, REMOVAL AND PROTECTION OF TREES prepared by a
certified arborist shall be provided for any lot, parcel or combination of lots or pa�cels for which a
development application for a subdivision, partition, site development �eview, planned development,
or conditional use is filed. Protection is preferred over removal where possible.
THE TREE PLAN SHALL INCLUDE the following:
➢ tdentification of the location, size and species of all existing t�ees including trees designated
as significant by the City;
➢ Identification of a program to save existing trees or mitigate tree �emoval over 12 inches in
caliper. Mitigation must follow the replacement guidelines of Section 18.790.060.D according
to the following standards and shall be exclusive of trees required by other development code
provisions for landscaping, streets and parking lots:
► Retainage of less than 25% of existing trees over 12 inches in calipe� requires a mitigation
p�ogram according to Section 18.150.070.D. of no net loss of trees;
� Retainage of from 25 to 50% of existing trees over 12 inches in caliper requi�es that two-
thirds of the trees to be removed be mitigated according to Section 18.790.060.D.;
� Retainage of from 50 to 75% of existing trees over 12 inches in caliper requires that 50%
of the trees to be removed be mitigated according to Section 18.790_060.D.;
� Retainage of 75% or greater of existing trees over 12 inches in caliper requires no
mitigation;
➢ Identification of all trees which are proposed to be removed; and
➢ A protection program defining standards and methods that will be used by the applicant to
protect trees during and after construction.
TREES REMOVED WITHIN THE PERIOD �F ONE (1) YEAR PRiOR TO A DEVELOPMENT
APPLICATION LISTED ABOVE will be inventoried as part of the t�ee plan above and will be
- �eplaced according to Section 18.790.060.D.
[+�MITIGATION [Refer to Code Sectlon 18.790.060.E1
REPLACEMENT OF A TREE shall take place according to the following guidelines:
➢ A replacement tree shall be a substantially similar species considering site characteristics.
➢ If a replacement tree of the species of the tree removed or damaged is not reasonably
available, the Director may allow replacement with a different species of equivalent natural
resource value.
CITY OF TIGARD Pre-Application Conference Notes Page 5 of 8
NON�tesiden6al AppGcatioNPlanning Division Sectiai
➢ If a replacement tree of the size cut is not reasonably available on the local market or would
not be viable, the Director shall require replacement with more than one tree in accordance
with the following forrnula:
� The number of replacement trees required shall be determined by dividing the estimated
caliper size of the tree removed or damaged, by the caliper size of the largest reasonably
available replacement trees. If this number of trees cannot be viably located on the
subject property, the Director may require one (1)or more �eplacement trees to be planted
on other property within the city, either public property or, with the consent of the owner,
private property.
➢ The planting of a replacement tree shall take place in a manner reasonably calculated to
allow growth to matunty.
IN LIEU OF TREE REPLACEMENT under Subsection D of this section, a party may, with the
consent of the Director, elect to compensate the City for its costs in performing such tree
replacement.
[�CLEAR YISION AREA [Refer to C�do C6apter 18.7951
The Ci requires that CLEAR VISION AREAS BE MAINTAINED BETWEEN THREE (3) AND
EIGHT�8) FEET IN HEIGHT at road/driveway, road/railroad, and road/road intersections. The size
of the reqwred dear vision area depends upon the abutting streeYs functional classification and any
existing obstructions within the ciear vision a�ea.
❑ ADDI110NAL LOT DIMENSIONAL REQUIREMENTS [ fer to Cade Section 18.810.0601
MINIMUM LOT FRONTAGE: 25 feet u ess lot is created through the minor land partition process.
Lots created as part of a partition mu have a minimum of 15 feet of frontage or have a minimum
15-foot wide access easement.
The DEPTH OF ALL LOTS SHA NOT EXCEED 2%2 TIMES THE AVERAGE WIDTH, unless the
parcel is less than 1'/Z times the�nimum lot size of the applicable zoning district.
,
a�
.
CODECHAPTERS
f 18.330 ico�,ama,ai u�� �S.6ZO(Tgard Triangle Design Standa�ds) �✓/ ')$.765(OffStreet ParkirglL�ng Requirements)
_ 18.340��aors�,c�r��� 18.630 Nv�n�y�sq��R�y�i c«,t«� �$.775(Sensitive Lands Review)
_ 18.350(P�anr�d�eve�menq � 18.705�Ao�y�c�,��� � 18.780 lsg�l
� 18.360�sne���o�,c Re�� 18.710�Ao�sso�y R�a��u�� _ 18.785 R�ry u�Pe��
= 18.370(variance�Ad�ustrnen�s) 18.715(�ensiry�onywtations) .� 18.790 R�a�q
_ 18.380(zon�ny Ma�ext Amendments) 18.720(�yn�tin�uty st��dards) � 18.795(vcsua���earance Areas)
18.385�M�u��P�� � 18.725(Environmenta��ertonnance standaros) _ 18.798(wre�ess Conununication Facaities)
.�18.390(oecision Mawrg Prooeduresr�mpact study) 18.730��cepeo�,s To��o�t s��a�� � 18.810�sv�t&uv�cy im�o��,t st���
_ 18.410�.�c u�a�m,�,�� 18.740�H�ro�;�o��y�
_ 18.420��P�� 18.742�r�«�oo�,��,P��
_ 18.430�s���� � 18.745(�andsca�inq&s«een�ng standards�
�C 18.510 tR��a�,n�z«��o�a�� 18.750�nn�,�,�eamnon�ri«�R�����
- 18.520{c«nme�cie�z«iiny nisaids) ���� 18.755(rvraed soGd wastelRecyding Storage)
_ 18.530 p�a�a�z«��o��� � 18.760(Norxont«mi�q s�a�or�s)
CITY OF TIGARD Pre-Application Conference Notes Page 6 of 8
NON-Residential ApplicatioNPl�niny Division 5ection
AOUI110NA160N6ERNS OR 60MMENTS:
-'� '
�� �V `����i`,�F`_� � C' i. L_�f?.t'_ � �P-11��...� �(`•!)[_�j.�.r-
� � .�c�,��a�,��r_�c� r�,�_�',,���
- Sc��c� 4�t�'s
- 1��:��',�:�� ----
� C-:(+i,,r�e�. r1t,.�C SC•.;�:re nr�n,,,�us- �e�l�c�
J
�
� �1H� �e e'`�1� -�c� �c3 r,� �;,,o� ('r�,�-Nee,� �,r.��F �,��'c��-n,.c��; r�,J
� �.�'c.`� _'r,,�f? t�.�:�� t�-�F''Y ��;,� �n� ---
,� a�k;,.�_t �s o�. gea�;,,�_
� ILC�ui�rcC a �.�.�. � �t+R�C .
PROCEDURE
', Administrative Staff Review.
� Public hearing befo�e the Land Use Hearings Officer.
Public hearing before the Planning Commission.
Public hearing before the Planning Commission with the Commission making a
recommendation on the proposal to the City Council. An additional public hearing shall be
held by the City Council.
APPLICATION SUBMIiTAI PROCESS
All APPLICATIONS MUST BE ACCEPTED BY A PLANNING DIVISION STAFF MEMBER of the
Community Development Depa�tment at Tigard City Hall offices. PLEASE NOTE: A lications
submitted b mail or dro ed off at the counter without Plannin Division acce tance ma e
returned. The Planninq counter closes at :00 PM.
Maps submitted with an application shall be folded IN ADVANCE to 8.5 by 11 inches. One (1),
8 2' x 1" ma o a ro osed ro'ect shouTc� e su mitted or attachment to the staff re ort or
administrative decision. Application with un o ed maps shal not e accepted.
The Planning Division and Engineering Depa�tment will perform a preliminary review of the
application and will determine whether an application is complete within 30 days of the counter
submittal. Staff will notify the applicant if additional information or additional copies of the submitted
materials are required.
CITY OF TIGARD Pre-Application Confere�ce Notes Page 7 of 8
NON-Residen5al AppicationlPlanning Oivision$ec6on
. I
The administrative decision or public hearing will typically occu�approximately 45 to 60 days after an
appiication is accepted as being complete by the Planning Division. Applications involving difficult or
protracted issues or requiring review by other jurisdictions may take additional time to review.
Written recommendations from the Pla�ning staff are issued seven (7) days prior to the public
hearing. A 10-day public appeal period follows all land use decisions. An appeal on this matter
would be heard by the Tigard Ncr,u,; �r,, ,'�;;'�� r� �,;� c ;�;, �'�..:.,� ,1 . A basic flow chart
which illustrates the review process is available from the Plannin Division upon request.
Land use applications requiring a public hearing must have notice posted on-site by the
applica�t no less than 10 days prio�to the public hearing.
This PRE-APPLICATION CONFERENCE AND THE NOTES OF THE CONFERENCE ARE
INTENDED TO INFORM the prospective applicant of the primary Community Development Code
requirements applicable to the potential development of a pa�ticular site and to allow the City staff
and prospective applicant to discuss the opportunities and constraints affecting development of the
site.
BUILDIN6 PERMITS
PLANS FOR BUILDING AND OTHER RELATED PERMITS WIL� NOT BE ACCEPTED FOR
REVIEW UNTIL A LAND USE APPROVAL HAS BEEN ISSUED. Final inspection approvals by
the Building Division will not be granted until there is compliance with all conditions of
development approval. These pre-application notes do not include comments from the
Building Division. For proposed buildings or modifications to existing buildings, it is
recommended to contact a Building Division Plans Examiner to determine if there are
building code issues that would prevent the structure from being constructed, as proposed.
Additionally, with regard to Subdivisions and Minor Land Pa�titions where any st�ucture to be
demolished has system development charge (SDC) credits and the underlying parcel for that
structure will be eliminated when the new plat is recorded, the Cit 's olic is to a I those s stem
develo ment credits to the first buildin ermit issued in the develo ment (UNLE S OTHERWISE
DIRECTED BY T E DEVELOPER AT THE TIME IN WHICH THE DEMOLITION PERMIT IS
OBTAINED).
e con erence an no es canno cover a o e requiremen s an aspec s re a e o
site planning that should ap ply to the development of your site plan. Failure of the staff to provide
information required b the Gode shall not constitute a waiver of the applicable standards or requirements.
It is recommended tha�a pros_pectiye applicant either obtain and read t1�e Community Development Code or
ask any questions of City statt�relative to Code requirements prior to submitting an application.
AN ADDITIONAL PRE-APPLICATION FEE AND CONFERENCE WILL BE REQUIRED IF AN
APPLICATION PERTAINING TO THIS PRE-APPLICATION CONFERENCE IS SUBMITTED AFTER A
PERIOD OF MORE THAN SIX (6) MONTHS FOLLOWING THIS CONFERENCE (unless deemed as
unnecessary by the Planning Division).
PREPARED BY: ��'c�� �,, �°�_��
CITY OF TIGARD PLANNING DIVISION - STAfF PERSON H4LDING PRE-APP. MEETING
PHONE: (503) 639-4111 �A1(: (503) 684-1291
E-MAIL- staffs fiRt aame @ci.tigard.or.us
�k�,.s.�..�
TITLE 18(fITY OF TIGARD'S COMMUNITY DEYELOPMENT CODE)INTERNET QOURESS: www.ci�igard.or.us
H:lpattylmasterslPre-App Notes Commercial.doc Updated: 3-Oct-02
(Engineering sec6on:preapp.eng)
CITY OF TIGARD P�e-Applica6on Conference Notes Page 8 of S
NoN-Residen6al nppGcafioNPlan�irg oorisio�sec600