The URL can be used to link to this page

CUP2006-00002 r 120 DAYS = 12/12/2006 DATE OF FILING: 8/23/2006 ., - . CITY OF TIGARD � � ' Washington County, Oregon NOTICE OF FINAL ORDER BY THE HEARINGS OFFICER Case Numbers: CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT (.'UP 2006-00002 AD USTMENT VAR 2006-00069 Case Name: MITGH CHARTER SCHOOL Applicant's Name/Address: MITC�-I Charter School PO Box 230575 T OR 97223 Owner's Name/Address: Calvin Presb erian Chur�h 10445 SW Canterb Lane T ar�d OR 97224 Address of Property: 10445 SW Canterb Lane T ard OR 97224 Ta�c Ma /Lot Nos.: Washin on Co.Tax Assessor's Ma No.2S111B�Tax Lot 02800 A FINAL ORDER INCORPORATTNG THE FACTS, FINDINGS AND GONQ.USIONS APPROVING A RE4UEST FOR A CONDITTONAL LJSE AND ADTUSTMENT. Tf-� Q'1 Y OF TTGARD HEARINGS OFFICER HAS` REVIEWED TT�E APPLICANI'S PLANS, NARRATTVE, MATERIALS, GOIVIMENTS OF REVIEWING AGENQES, TT� PLANNING DIVISIONS STAFF REPORT AND RECOMNIENDATTONS FOR Tf-� APPLICATTON DESQZIBED IN FURTHER DETAIL IN TI-� STAFF REPORT. TI� HEARINGS OFFIC�R HELD A PUBLIC HEARING ON AUGUST 21. 2006 TO RECEIVE TESTTMONY REGARDING TF-IIS APPLICATTON. THIS DEQSION HAS BEEN BASED ON THE FACTS, FINDINGS AND QONQ.U5ION5 CONTAINED WITHIN T�IIS FINAL ORDER Reques� ➢ Conditional Use Pernut approval to allow the M.I.T.GH. Charter School to occupy classroom space in the Calvin Presbyterian Church. MI.T.GI3 is K-7 and will have up to 160 students. The school will lease the lower level of the church, which has 8 classrooms and a commons area. The school will also have access to a fenced playground on site. The applicant does not propose any changes to the church exterior or site. In addition, the applicant requests an adjustment to the bicy�le parking standard to reduce the required number of bicy�le parking spaces from 48 to 6. At the close of the record on August 21, 2006, the Hearings Officer conditionally approved the request, subject to the conditions of approval within this final order. Zone: R 3.5: Low Densiry Residential District. A��licable Review Cxiteria: Community Development Code C�apters 18.330, 18.360, 18.390, 18.510, 18.705, 18.725, 18.745, 18.755, 18.765, 18.780, 18.790,18.795 and 18.810. Action: ➢ ❑ Approval as Requested ❑x Approval with Conditions ❑ Denial Notice: Notice was published in the newspaper and mailed to: ❑X Owners of Record within the Required Distance ❑O Affected Government Agencies ❑x Interested Parties 0 The Applicants and Owiiers The adopted findings of fact and decision can be obta.ined from the Plazuiing Division/CommunityDevelopment Department at the Cary of Tigard City Hall. Final Decision: THIS DECISION IS FINAL ON AUGUST 24,2006 AND BECOMES EFFECTIVE ON SEPTEMBER 9, 2006 UNLESS AN APPEAL IS FILED. Appeal: The decision of the Review Authority is final for pur�oses of appeal on the date that it is mailed. Any party with standing as provided in Section 18390.040.G.1. may a�peal tlus decision in accordance with Section 18.390.040.G.2. of the Tigard CommunitY Develo ment Code which provides that a written appeal together with the required fee shall be filed with the Director anthui ten�10) business days of the date the notice of the decision was mailed. .The appeal fee schedule and forms are available from the Planning Division of Tigard City Hall, 13125 SW Hall Boulevard,Tigard,Oregon 97223. THE DEADLINE FOR FILING AN APPEAL IS 5:00 PM ON SEPTEMBER 8, 2006. Questions: If yt�u have any questions,please call the City of Tigard Plannuig Division at(503) 639-4171. , � BEFORE THE LAND USE HEARINGS OFFICER FOR THE CITY OF TIGARD, OREGON Regarding an application by MITCH Charter School ) F I N A L O R D E R for a conditional use permit and adjustment for a K-7 ) CUP2006-00002 charter school in a church at 10445 SW Canterbury ) VAR2006-00069 Lane in the R-3.5 zone in the City of Tigard, Oregon )(MITCH Charter School) A. SUMMARY 1. Debi Lorence filed the application for MITCH Charter School (the "applicant"). She requests approval of a conditional use pernut to operate a charter school for up to 160 students in kindergarten through 7`i' grade. The school will be conducted in an existing building on the grounds of Calvin Presbyterian Church at 10445 SW Canterbury Lane, which occupies the northwest quadrant of the intersection of Canterbury Lane and 103`d Avenue (tax lot 2800,WCTM 2S111BC (the "site"). The site contains about 3.53 acres and is zoned R-3.5. The StaffReport to the Hearings Officer dated August 5, 2002 (the "Staff Report") contains a history of City review and development on the site, which the hearings officer incorporates as his own. The applicant does not propose to enlarge the building or to add parking or to undertake other significant development to accommodate the proposed charter school. The applicant requests approval of an adjustment to the minimum bicycle parking space standard to reduce the number of spaces required from 48 to 6. 2. Tigard Hearings Officer Joe Turner(the "hearings officer") conducted a duly noticed public hearing to receive testimony and evidence in the matter. At the public hearing, City staff recommended conditional approval of the application. Representatives of the applicant and the church testified in support of the application. Other than service providers, no one testified orally or in writing. The hearings officer closed the public record at the end of the hearing. There were no disputed issues in this case. 3. The hearings officer concludes that the applicant sustained the burden of proof for a conditional use permit and adjustment to the bicycle parking space standard, based on the findings and conclusions included and incorporated herein and subject to conditions at the end of this final order. B. HEARING AND RECORD 1. The hearings officer held a duly noticed public hearing on August 21, 2006 to receive and consider public testimony in this matter. The record includes a witness list, materials in the casefile as of the close of the record, including materials submitted after the hearing, and an audio record of the hearing. At the beginning of the hearing,the hearings officer made the declaration required by ORS 197.763. The hearings off'icer disclaimed any ex parte contacts, bias or conflicts of interest. The following is a summary by the hearings officer of selected relevant testimony offered at the hearing. 2. City planner Emily Eng summarized the Staff Report. 3. Lee Weislogel appeared for the applicant and accepted the findings and recommended conditions in the Staff Report. He requested the hearings officer modify condition 2 to note that schools are partially exempt from the noise standards of the Tigard Municipal Code ("TMC"). The applicant does not intend to generate amplified noise on the site. He waived the applicant's right to submit a final argument. 4. City Planning Director Dick Bewersdorff noted that the noise exemption for schools does not apply to amplified sounds or noise in excess of 85 dB. 5. Kay Smith testified on behalf of the Calvin Presbyterian Church, the property owner. She testified that the church supports the application and is looking forward to working with the applicant. 6. Debi Lawrence, the founder and director of the MITCH Charter School testified in support of the application. 7. At the end of the hearing,the hearings officer closed the public record and announced his intention to approve the application subject to recommended conditions in the Staff Report. C. DISCUSSION 1. The Staff Report identifies the applicable approval criteria for the application and applies tbem to the record in the case. The hearings officer agrees that the standards identified in the Staff Report are applicable and finds that they are correctly applied to the facts of the case in the Staff Report. Substantial evidence in the record shows that the proposed use does or can comply with the applicable approval criteria for a CUP, and adoption of recommended conditions of approval as amended will ensure final plans are submitted and implemented as approved consistent with those criteria and standards and will prevent, reduce or mitigate potential adverse impacts of the development consistent with the requirements of the CDC. The findings in the Staff Report also describe why the applicant adjustment to the bicycle parking standards requested by the applicant complies with applicable standards and why the adjustment is supported by substantial evidence in the record. The hearings officer adopts the findings and conclusions in the Staff Report as his own. 2. Proposed condition of approval2 in the Staff Report provides: The applicant is hereby notified that generating noise in excess of 50 dBA may result in complaints requiring alteration of activities. The applicant shall certify that the proposed use will not generate noise in excess of the standards specified in the Tigard Municipal Code, Chapter 7.40.160. CUP2006-00002 and VAR2006-00069 Hearings O�cer Final Order (MITCH Charter School) Page 2 Section 7.40.160 of the Tigard Municipal Code"TMC")prohibits noise in excess of 50 dB at any time between seven a.m. and nine p.m. the same day.� However TMC 7.40.180.A provides an exemption for: Non-amplified sounds created by organized athletic or other group activities, when such activities are conducted on property generally used [as a] school... during normal hours for such events. The applicant proposed to operate a school on the site. Therefore activities on the site are subject to the exemption of TMC 7.40.180.A. However TMC7.40.190 prohibits noise in excess of 85 dB for more than 5 minutes in any calendar day, regardless of the exemptions. The examiner finds tbat condition of approval2 should be modified to reflect the noise regulations that apply to the proposed school. D. CONCLUSIONS Based on the findings and discussion provided or incorporated in this final order, the hearings officer concludes that the applicant sustained the burden of proof that the proposed conditional use permit and adjustment do or will comply with the applicable criteria of the Community Development Code, provided development that occurs after this decision complies with applicable local, state, and federal laws and with conditions of approval warranted to ensure such compliance occurs in fact. E. DECISION In recognition of the findings and conclusions contained herein, and incorporating the Staff Report and public testimony and exhibits received in this matter, the hearings officer hereby approves CUP2006-00002 and VAR2006-00069 (MITCH Charter School), subject to the following conditions of approval: CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL THE FOLLOWING CONDITIONS SHALL BE SATISFIED PRIOR TO ISSUANCE OF BUILDING PERI�ZITS: Submit to the Current Planning Division (Emily Eng, (503) 718-2712) for review and approval: 1. The applicant shall provide a 6-stall bicycle rack in addition to the existing onsite bicycle rack that is not within parking aisles, required landscaping or pedestrian ways. A revised plan will be required showing the location and specific design and location of the required bicycle rack in accordance with standards in Section 18.765.OSO.A through D of the code. 2. The ap�licant is hereby notified that activities on the site are subJ'ect to the noise limitations of Article IV of Section 7.40 of the Tigard Municipal Code. The applicant shall certify that the proposed use will not generate noise in excess of the standards specified in this section of the Tigard Municipal Code. 'The maximum noise level is reduced to 40 dB between nine p.m.and seven a.m.the following day. CUP2006-00002 and VAR2006-00069 Hearings O�cer Final Order (MITCH Charter School) Page 3 ! " 3. The applicant shall obtain a sign permit prior to erecting a si n on the site. The subject sign shall comply with the sign code (Chapter 17.780�. 4. Based on staff observation of the water quality facilities, staff suggests that the applicant work with the property owner to replant the water quality facilities and implement a maintenance plan to mitigate the impacts of not only additional vehicle trips, but current trips. Note: This is a recommendation and not a condition of approval. THE FOLLOWING CONDITION SHALL BE SATISFIED PRIOR TO ISSUANCE OF BUILDING PERMITS: Submit to the Building Department (Brian Blalock, (503) 718-2436) for review and approval: 5. The applicant is required to obtain a building permit for the change of use/occupancy. The applicant shall submit a revised interior floor plan that shows which rooms will be used as classrooms. THE FOLLOWING CONDITION SHALL BE SATISFIED PRIOR TO ISSUANCE OF BUILDING PERIVIITS: Submit to the Engineering Department(Bethany Stewart, (503) 718-2436) for review and approval: 6. Prior to issuance of a building permit, the applicant shall pay the addressing fee if using an address other than the existing address of the proposed site. THE FOLLOWING CONDITIONS SHALL BE SATISFIED PRIOR TO A FINAL BUILDING INSPECTION: Submit to the Engineering Department (Kim McMillan, (503) 718-2642) for review and approval: 7. Prior to final building inspection, the applicant shall trim the trees and bushes specified in the Traffic Analysis report m order to improve sight distance. 8. Prior to final building inspection,the applicant's engineer shall submit final sight distance certification for the three access points. 9. Staff suggests that additional right-of-way be dedicated to the Public along the frontage of 103rd Avenue to increase the right-of-way to 27 feet from the centerline. The description shall be tied to the existing right-of-way centerline. The dedication document shall be on City forms. Instructions are available from the Engineering Department. Note: This is recommendation and not a condition of approval. THIS APPROVAL MUST BE IMPLEMENTED WITHIN 18 MONTHS FROM THE EFFECTIVE DATE OF THIS DECISION. DATED this 23`d day of August 2006. Joe Turner, Esq., AICP City of Tigard Land Use Hearings Officer CUP2006-00002 and VAR2006-00069 Hearings Officer Final Order (MITCH Charter School) Page 4 - . GEOGRAVNIGINFORMAiION SvSTEM . �.� VIQl�TI'I'Y MAP ��,-� - _________= CLJP2006-00002 VAR2006-00069 M.I.T.C.H. CHARTER , � � - SCHO�L m TE �G �: � T �E - , •< r r�i - �E CANTERB � BUCIATp .'' ry Q F�. . � RA - ; �� • � . g�[F BEIN�RO.. _L , w . TIOarG Mee Map I^ � • � N m � 0 700 200 300 400 Feel MURDOCK ST . .� � � � r BInfOrmation on this map is fa general locatian only and � B , . shaAd be verif ed with the Devetoprnent Services Divlsion. � � 13125 SW Hail BHd � � Tigard.OR 97223 p� DELMONTE DR h��P:«�3�:��a.� Community Development Plot date:Jul 27,2006;C:\magiclMAGIC03.APR �-- ...._.__..__. � _._-- ---.. _ _ _ ___ _.._ .. _..- •- -------- • —�_ __.._.- , . . . _ . _ , _ .. _ . —� . � ' � �,�. �� . ---�-� ' • '�'d' - � I i � � ;� i. . �, � ;�� --- �� 1 � ; - �, ; j � � YI � , � � � �. '�•� ' ' � � ; � �' _'_�•_�—��' 4-�--p� . � . . I . � ' I � � , . _� � 3.� ..�- ��._ -- � . " . i : : �k` _ —_ — - � � � z _- ; , _=_ . � � � . �I� �.., . ��,,�+_;�,.� � _ �; � � • ' � vr� — =-- - . , i� " �.,�,�� III� - I Ilf� I 1 . ii� . / ,r _ _ — II � � � • .t3 . . �� ' __ �a\ h ' � � � . . � / — . , fr —�. � 1 . •-i . —_� � � '� � ��,�: � �� s , . F=�-�—�. ;� � , - � � d �• � , i �,,. � " �� \ \ y _ � � L % � ' !� I \ � '�t � � � � � � � � —� I � � � ,�;� , ,, �� ,, � , , � ,� II _ I {,, � , �, � � h, � ; � � ' } i � � �lia�ryi `�. � � . ? . I �� I �� _ �"�' Y„, ��*�� I . i..� f�� \ � 5 p.�'. h r,;ll I p � � I I 1� : L �� •� � �� j _ ��fd � .�^�i�� P z � �� \ \�\..��/��/�i -.1� �I�4� .��v�' y I � � 14i �� l �\�_� � �� ,,:;y'�N�4�4'��l , . � 1 i . . - . � � � 1 � �� N��k�� '�� i . ! ' C � � �1m�4 '� � � c � I�� f ' G`+p„ ,tl� � �"'_ �'� :q �:, t , a 1� '*�y ��` � ; � �� ?� . �- � a: xh ' ��"�u��, 4 � � � �� _ �. � � -E---.�" _ _ -_ . � � � � _ � . � � � Q . � R �x � � �� .r =�� t $ ; . �p . a �- � � + •!^' � . � i�� - �'•w , �_ � � � �� .� , � �, � � € �� g � � �;:� � � ` �.- � �� I : ��`-�� 6 �� . � ,: �� .a � .i �. a I �'_ � o_ � � �� . a � n . Va I �i I �2 _ � ��_ . .� K.N. lo9OP � � � '�r � �� ,,;�� . �� ; � �� ,� ,�;. i „ � �� 1�3� Presbvtenan Church . •..� , •, �� I � � 10445 S.W. Canterbury Lane - � i °�&.e�� " Tigard,Oregon 47224-4811 , •�� :"'��, . �ee.rP.' . . ,. , . NOTICE TO MORTGAG_ �,LIENHOLDER,VENDOR G. .�ELLER: THE TIGARD DEVELOPMF��tT CODE REQUIRES Tf-IAT IF YOU RECEIVE THIS�OTICE, �� IT SI��LL BE PRO��'TI.Y FORWARDED TO TI�PURCH:�.SER � :'?�,: . . � � PUBLIC HEARING NOTICE NOTICE IS HEREBY GIVEN THAT THE TIGARD HEARINGS OFFICER, AT A MEETING ON MONDAY AUGUST 21, 2006 AT 7:00 PM, IN 'I'HE TOWN HAI.I, OF THE TIGARD CIVIC CENTER AT 13125 SW T,T, BOLJLEVARD,TTGARD,OREGON 97223 WII_.L CONSIDER THE FOLLO��jING APPLICATION: FILE NOS.: CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT (CUP) 2006-00002 ADJUSTMENT (VAR) 200G-00069 FILE TITLE: M.I.T.C.H. CHARTER SCHOOL APPLICANT: M.LT.C.H. Charter School OWNER: Calvin Presbyterian Church PO Box 230575 10445 SW Canterbury Lane Tigard, OR 97223 Tigard, OR 97224 APPLICANT'S Ed Murphy �p; Parati-LDC Design Group 20085 NW Tanasbourne Dnve Hillsborq OR 97124 REQUEST: The applicant is requesting Condirional Use Pemut to allow the M.I.T.C.H. Charter School to occupy classroom space in the Calvin Presbyterian Church. M.I.T.C.H. is K-8 and has approximately 198 students. The school will lease the lower level of the church, which has 8 classrooms and a commons area. The school will also have access to a fenced playground on site. The applicant does not propose any changes to the church exterior or site. In addition, the applicant requests an adjustment to the bicycle parking standard of 6 spaces per classroom. The applicant desires to reduce the required number of bicycle parking spaces ftom 48 to 6. LOCATION: 10445 SW Canterbury Lane;Washington County Tax Map 2S111BC,Tax Lot 2800. ZONE: R-3.5: Low-Densit� Residential District. The R-3.5 zoning district is designed to accommodate detached single-family homes with or without accessory residential units at a minimum lot size of 10,000 square feet. Duplexes are permitted conditionally. Some civic and institutional uses are also permitted conditionally. APPLICABLE REVIEW CRITERIA: Community Development Code Chapters: 18.330, 18.360, 18.390, 18.510, 18.705, 18.725, 18.745, 18.755, 18.765, 18.780, 18.790, 18.795,and 18.810. THE PUBLIC HEARING ON THIS iV1�1'1`I"F.R WILL BE CONDUCTED IN ACCORDANCE WITH THE RULES OF CHAP'TER 18.390 OF THE COMMUNITY DEVELOP1�iENT CODE AND RULES OF PROCEDURES ADOPTED BY THE TIGARD CITY COUNCIL AND AVAILABLE AT CITY HALL. ASSISTNE LIST'ENING DEVICES ARE AVAILABLE FOR PERSONS WITH IMPAIRED HEARING. THE CITY WILL ALSO ENDEAVOR TO ARRANGE FOR QUALIFIED SIGN LANGUAGE INTERPRETERS AND QUAI,IFIF"T� BII,INGUAL INTERPRETERS LJPON REQUEST. PLEASE CALL (503) 639-4171, EXT. 2438 (VOICE) OR (503) 6842772 (TDD-TELEC01�BvIL`NICATIONS DEVICES FOR THE DEAF� NO LESS THr1N ONE WEEK PRIOR TO THE HEr�RING TO Mr1KE ARRANGEMENTS. ANYONE WISHING TO PRESENT V'vtuTTEN TESTIMONY ON THIS PROPOSED ACTION MAY DO SO IN WRITING PRIOR TO OR AT THE PUBLIC HEARING. ORAL TESTIMONY MAY BE PRESENTED AT THE PUBLIC HEARING. AT THE PUBLIC HEARING, THE HEARINGS OFFICER WILL RECEIVE A STAFF REPORT PRESENTATION FROM THE CITY PLANNER, OPEN THE PUBLIC F-LEARING,AND INVITE BOTH ORAI.AND WRITTEN TESTTMONY. THE HEARINGS OFFICER MAY CONTINUE THE PUBLIC HEARING TO ANOTHER MEETING TO OBTAIN ADDITIONAL INFORMATTON OR CLOSE THE PUBLIC HEARING AND TAKE ACTION ON THE APPLICATION. IF A PERSON SUBMITS EVIDENCE IN SUPPORT TO THE APPLICATION LESS THAN SEVEN (� DAYS PRIOR TO THE PUBLIC HEARING,ANY PARTY IS ENTITLED TO REQUEST A CONTINUANCE OF THE HEARING. IF THERE IS NO CONTINUANCE GRANTED AT THE HEARING,ANY PARTICIPANT IN THE HEARING MAY REQUEST THAT THE RECORD REMAIN OPEN FOR AT LEAST SEVEN (7} DAYS AFTER Tf-�E HEARING. A REQUEST THAT THE RECORD REMAIN OPEN CAN BE MADE ONLY AT THE FIRST EVIDENTIARY HEt1RING(ORS 197.763(6). INCLUDED IN THIS NOTICE IS A LIST OF APPROVAL CRITERIA APPLICABLE TO THE REQUEST FROM THE TIGARD COMIvIUNITY DEVELOPMENT CODE AND THE TIGARD COMPREHENSIVE PLAN. APPROVAL OR DISAPPROVAL OF THE REQUEST BY 'I� HEARINGS OFFICER WILI. BE BASED UPON THESE CRTTF.RTA AND T�IESE CRITERIA ONLY. AT'I'HE HEARING IT IS IMPORTANT THAT COMMENTS RELATING TO THE REQUEST PERTAII>1 SPECIFICALLY TO THE APPLICABLE CRI'I'ERIA LISTED. FAILURE TO RAISE AN ISSUE IN PERSON OR BY LETI'ER AT SOME POINT PRIOR TO THE CLOSE OF THE — HEARING ON'TfiE REQiJEST ACCOMl'ANIED BY STATEMENTS OR �VIDENCE-SiJFFICIENT TO ALLOW THE HEARINGS AiTI'HORITY AN OPPORTUNITY TO RESPOND TO THE ISSUE PRECLUDES AN APPEAL TO Tf3E LAND USE BOARD OF APPEALS BASED ON THAT ISSUE. AT"T•DOCUI�,NTS AND APPLICABLE CRITERIA IN THE ABOVE-NOTED Fi1,F. ARE AVAII.ABLE FOR INSPECT'ION AT NO COST OR COPIES CAN BE OBTAINED FOR 'I'WENTY-FIVE CENTS (25C) PER PAGE, OR THE CURRENT RATE C�i�RGED FOR COPIES AT THE TIME OF THE REQUEST. AT LEAST SEVEN (7) DAYS PRIOR TO THE HEARING,A COPY OF THE STAFF REPORT WILL BE AVAILABLE FOR INSPECITON AT NO COST,OR A COPY CAN BE OBTAINED FOR'I'�UENT'Y-FIVE CEN'IS (25G) PER PAGE, OR T'��E CURRENT RATE CHARGED FOR COPIES AT THE TII�fE OF THE REQUEST. FOR FURTHER INFORMAT'ION PLEASE CONTACT THE STAFF PLANNER EMILY ENG AT(503) 639-4171,TIGARD CITY HALL, 13125 SW HALL BOULEVARD,TIGARD,OREGON 97223,OR BY E-MAIL TO Emily�,riQ�td-or.gov. °y �Z(�INI'I'1'�L�P � �s�; __________ CL�P3006-00002 `"�R2006-OOOG9 �f.I.T.C.H CH_�RT'ER SCHOOL re � ,.<•: � :::: �� `\� ��,"� � � �� y�i � , ��. Q CANTERBUR � �--� .'� :�...i�— .�.t�� ,F=..� �y; `' w _. TM� • N MLIRpOCK S � � � � � �� ....� ��%wH e ,...,n� � m ELMOtVTE DR """'«"' .,..... niry evelo0msnl o[de[a Jul 2. . lmeqcNU T A 't' ~S•�H��'". '' -.. . � .. P IC HEARING ITEM ' The following will be considered by the Tigard Hearings Officer C0�1ilMUNITY �n Monday August 21.2006 at 7•00 PM at the Tigard Civic Center -Town Hall, 13125 SW Hall Blvd.,Tigard, Oregon. Both public SPAPEI�S oral and written testimony is invited. The public hearing on this matter will be conducted in accordance 6605 SE Lake Road, Portland, OR 97222• PO with the Tigard Municipal Code and the rules of procedure adopt- Box 22109• Portland, OR 97269 ed by the Council and available at City Hall or the rules of proce- Phone:503-684-0360 Fax: 503-620-3433 dure set forth in Chapter 18.390. Testimony may be submitted in Email: legals@commnewspapers.com �ting prior to or at the public hearing or verbally at the public hearing only. Failure to raise an issue in person or by letter at some AF F I DAV I T O F P U B L I CAT I O N point prior to the close of the hearing accompanied by statements State of Oregon, County of Washington, SS or evidence sufficient to afford the decision-maker an opportunity to respond to the issue precludes appeal to the Land Use Board of I, Charlotte AllSOp, being the first duly SwOrn, Appeal based on that issue. Failure to specify the criterion from depose and say that I am the Accounting the Community Development Code or Comprehensive Plan at Manager of The Times(senring Tigard, which a comment is directed precludes an appeal based on that cri- Tualatin & Sherwood), a newspaper of terion. general circulation, published at Beaverton, in A copy of the application and all documents and evidence submit- the aforesaid county and state, as defined by ted by or on behalf of the applicant and the applicable criteria are ORS 193.0'10 and 193.020, that available for inspection at no cost. A copy of the staff report will be made available for inspection at no cost at least seven (7) days City of Tlgard prior to the hearing, and copies for all items can also be provided Public Hearing Item at a reasonable cost. TT10841 Further information may be obtained from the Planning Division a copy of which is hereto annexed, was (staff contact: Emily Eng� at 13125 SW Hall Blvd., Tigard, published in the entire issue of said Oregon 97223, by calling 503-639-4171, or by e-mail to newspaper for Emilyna tigard-or.�ov. � CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT (CUP) 2006-00002/ADJUST- successive and consecutive weeks in the MENT(VAR)2006-00069 following issues -M.I.T.C.H. CHARTER SCHOOL- August 3, 2006 REQUEST: THE APPLICANT IS REQUESTING CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT TO ALLOW THE M.I.T.C.H. CHARTER SCHOOL TO OCCUPY CLASSROOM SPACE IN � THE CALVIN PRESBYTERIAN CHURCH. M.I.T.C.H. IS K-S � � �,��l-�t� �. �'�� Ci��-�' �� AND HAS APPROXIMATELY 198 STUDENTS. THE SCHOOL Charlotte Allsop (Accounting anager) WILL LEASE THE LOWER LEVEL OF THE CHURCH, WHICH HAS 8 CLASSROOMS AND A COMMONS AREA. THE SCHOOL WILL ALSO HAVE ACCESS TO A FENCED ' Subscribed and sworn to before me this PLAYGROUND ON SITE. THE APPLICANT DOES NOT PRO- � August 3, 2006 POSE ANY CHANGES TO THE CHURCH EXTERIOR OR ! SITE. IN ADDITION, THE APPLICANT REQUESTS AN ��,V� ADJUSTMENT TO THE BICYCLE PARKING STANDARD OF 6 SPACES PER CLASSROOM. THE APPLICANT DESIRES TO NOTAR PUBLIC FOR OREGON REDUCE THE REQUIRED NUMBER OF BICYCLE PARKING My commission expires ��0�� p , r�� SPACES FROM 48 TO 6. LOCATION: 10445 SW L� CANTERBURY LANE; WASHINGTON COUNTY TAX MAP 2S 111 BC, TAX LOT 2800. ZONE: R-3.5: LOW-DENSITY Acct#10093001 RESIDENTIAL DISTRICT. THE R-3.5 ZONING DISTRICT Patricia Lunsford OFFICIAI IS DESIGNED TO ACCOMMODATE DETACHED SINGLE- City of Tigard �� SUZETTE I FAMILY HOMES WITH OR WITHOUT ACCESSORY RESI- 13125 SW Hall Blvd. ntoTr�Y Pua� Ti ard, OR 97223 ' ' COMMISSION� DENTIAL UNITS AT A MINIMUM LOT SIZE OF 10,000 9 MY COMMISSfON F�CPIRE. SQUARE FEET. DUPLEXES ARE PERMITTED CONDITION- Size:2 x 13 ALLY. SOME CIVIC AND INSTITUTIONAL USES ARE ALSO Amount Due $217.10 PERMITTED CONDITIONALLY. APPLICABLE REVIEW 'Remit to address above CRITERIA: COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT CODE CHAPTERS: 18330, 18.360, 18.390, 18.510, 18.705, 18.725, 18.745, 18.755, 18.765, 18.780, 18.790, 18.795, AND 18.810. ,�F ST ' \ -_I.-. . '. .. _. - . ' I I� . . _� �•Tl��i��ft.� I � . CL�P�IOG-UOUO2 � VAR2006-i�169 '�. \1.I.T.C.H==== CH.IRTER � ' SCHOOL �� - -�'TwrE '� �� : � ��_.r � -J I �i y �� - � � � �� ` - m PUBLISH 8/3/2006TT10841A I Emily Eng -[POSSIBLE SPAM� RE [POSSIBLE_SPAM] RE: MITCH Page 1 From: Kim Mcmillan To: Ed Murphy Date: 8/9/2006 3:41:28 PM Subject: [POSSIBLE_SPAM] RE: [POSSIBLE_SPAM� RE: MITCH Terrific. Thanks for supplying the additional data needed. Kim »> "Ed Murphy" <MurphyE@paraticompany.com> 08/09 3:27 PM »> Hi again. I went out to the site and measured some of the dimensions this afternoon. The planter strip on 103rd is 30"wide, from the inside of the sidewalk to the back of the curb. There are no street trees within the planter strip, but there are 8 street trees behind the sidewalk. The planter strip on Canterbury is 10'wide. There are two street trees within the planter strip, and another tree that is actually a parking lot tree but which functions like a street tree because the branches overhang the sidewalk. I measured the street width of 103rd at roughly 33'-7" (but it may be 34') from curb to curb along that portion of 103rd that is improved with curb and sidewalk on both sides. In the part that has a sidewalk only on the west side, it is 27' from curb to edge of pavement. Canterbury is 32'wide, curb to curb. The right-of-way of 103rd is 50', according to the tax assessor's map, and according to the construction drawings submitted for the church parking lot(completed in 2003, I think, after getting a Conditional Use Permit. It is across 103rd from the church, on tax lot 2S1 1 11 BC, tax lot 400.) The right of way for Canterbury is 55', 30' on the north side and 25'on the south side, according to the tax assessor's map. Hope this helps. Ed Ed Murphy Comprehensive Planning Manager direct line: 503-352-1136 cell phone: 503-314-0677 e-mail: murphveCc�ldcdesiqn.com ---------------------------------- LDC Design Group 20085 NW Tanasbourne Drive Hillsboro, Oregon 97124 t: 503.858.4242 f: 503.645.5500 e: hillsboro(a�ldcdesign.com w: www.ldcdesiqn.com — --- ��Emily Eng - [POSSIBLE_SPAM] RE: [POSSIBLE_SPAM] RE: MITCH � __ Page 2 OR: Hilisboro, Tillamook � WA: Vancouver, Bellevue � ID: Coeur d'Alene � CA: Sacramento � FL: Clermont DISCLAIMER: This message is intended for the sole use of the individual to whom it is addressed, and may contain information that is privileged, confidential and exempt from disclosure under applicable law. If you are not the addressee you are hereby notified that you may not use, copy, disclose, or distribute to anyone the message or any information contained in the message. If you have received this message in error, please immediately advise the sender by reply email and delete this message. -----Original Message----- From: Kim Mcmillan Imailto:KimCa�tigard-or.govl Sent: Wednesday, August 09, 2006 11:20 AM To: Ed Murphy Subject: [POSSIBLE_SPAM] RE: MITCH Ed, It would be great if someone actually field verifies. Thanks, Kim »> "Ed Murphy" <MurphvECa)_paraticompanv.com> 08/09 10:43 AM »> Thanks Kim. I know that the sidewalk on the north side of Canterbury is 6'wide, and the sidewalk on the west side of 103rd is 5'wide. Not sure about the street widths and planter strips...l will get back to you soon on those dimensions. We will check the r/w widths again. Ed Ed Murphy Comprehensive Planning Manager direct line: 503-352-1136 cell phone: 503-314-0677 e-mail: murphve(cr�.ldcdesiqn.com ---------------------------------- LDC Design Group 20085 NW Tanasbourne Drive Hillsboro, Oregon 97124 t: 503.858.4242 f: 503.645.5500 e: hillsboroCa�ldcdesi n.� w: www.ldcdesign.com OR: Hillsboro, Tillamook � WA: Vancouver, Bellevue � ID: Coeur d' Alene � CA: Sacramento � FL: Clermont DISCLAIMER: This message is intended for the sole use of the Emily Eng - [POSSIBLE_SPAM] RE: [POSSIBLE_SPAM] RE: MITCH Page 3 individual to whom it is addressed, and may contain information that is privileged, confidential and exempt from disclosure under applicable law. If you are not the addressee you are hereby notified that you may not use, copy, disclose, or distribute to anyone the message or any information contained in the message. If you have received this message in error, please immediately advise the sender by reply email and delete this message. -----Original Message----- From: Kim Mcmillan fmailto:Kim(cr�.tigard-or.gov] Sent: Wednesday, August 09, 2006 10:16 AM To: Ed Murphy; Ed Murphy Cc: Dick Bewersdorff; Emily Eng Subject: MITCH Ed, I'm trying to wrap up the staff report, but the information provided with regards to streets is inadequate. There is conflicting ROW information for 103rd and the pavement widths are incorrect. Also, I need to know the planter strip and sidewalk widths in order to have proper findings and conclusions that don't lead to additional . improvements. Thank you, Ki m CC: Emily Eng Emily Eng - RE: Verification of MITCH enrollment Page 1 From: "Ed Murphy" <MurphyE@paraticompany.com> To: "Emily Eng" <Emily@tigard-or.gov> Date: 8/10/2006 1:52:19 PM Subject: RE: Verification of MITCH enrollment Hi Emily. Sometimes we are talking about what MITCH expects enrollment to be next year, and sometimes we are talking about what it might be some time in the future. Since the future enrollment is very uncertain, and there is presently no room for K-8, IeYs go with the following: ' K-7 ' 8 classrooms, with one per grade. ` 20 students per classroom = 160 students. " 1 teacher per classroom, plus a music teacher, an art teacher, a PE teacher and an Ass't teacher= 12 teachers. * 2 office staff. * 1 principal. The lower floor area of the church will be remodeled to create two more classrooms on the west side, so there will be a total of 8 classrooms. Ed From: Emily Eng [mailto:Emily@tigard-or.gov] Sent: Thursday, August 10, 2006 11:50 AM To: Ed Murphy Subject: Verification of MITCH enrollment Ed, The application gives conflicting numbers for grades, enrollment& classrooms. It says that MITCH is K-8, then states it will be using 8 classrooms. I only see 6 on the floor plan, and 4 rooms that are not labeled classrooms. Also, later in the narrative it says MITCH is K-7, but doesn't give number of students. In the neighborhood meeting, it says 160 students at 20 per class but doesn't specify grades. In the traffic study, it says K-5 for the first 2 years. Also, the number of staff is stated at 12 teachers and 2 support staff and then later at 8 teachers and 3 support staff. Is it safe to assume MITCH is going to house the maximum enrollment(198 and 9 grades/classrooms (K-8)) on the Calvin site? How many teachers and support staff would there be? Thanks, Emily -- --- �Emily Eng - RE: Verification of MITCH enrollment Page 2 ------------------------------------------------------------- Emily Eng Assistant Planner City of Tigard Community Development 13125 SW Hall Blvd. Tigard, OR 97223 vwvw.ci.tigard.or.us T: (503) 718-2712 F: (501) 598-1960 CC: "Howard Roll" <hroll@ctsengineers.com>, <I.d.weislogel@comcast.net>, "DEBI LORENCE" <d.lorence4@verizon.net>, <xrueda@wbcable.net> - - Emil_y Eng - RE: MITCH- Landscaping percentage _ _ _ Page�2 From: Emily Eng [mailto:Emily@tigard-or.gov] Sent: Thursday, August 10, 2006 3:46 PM To: Ed Murphy Subject: MITCH- Landscaping percentage Ed, I need the know: -the percentage of the gross area including parking, loading and service areas that is landscaped -the percentage of the gross site area that is landscaped I can't find it in the application and iYs not clear from previous approvals on the site. Thanks, Emily Emily Eng - RE: MITCH- Landscaping percentage Page 1 From: "Ed Murphy" <MurphyE@paraticompany.com> To: "Emily Eng" <Emily@tigard-or.gov> Date: 8/10/2006 4:34:21 PM Subject: RE: MITCH- Landscaping percentage Emily-What is the difference between the two percentages? Sounds like the same thing. That will take a little time to figure out, since we did not create the site plan. The last CUP was approved in 2000, and the landscaping was approved at that time. MITCH is not changing the site at all, nor doing anything that would change the landscaping requirements. Couldn't you just state that the landscaping plan was approved in 2000 when the building was expanded, and MITCH is not changing the building or the site, and therefore it meets the landscaping requirements? Ed From: Emily Eng [mailto:Emily@tigard-or.gov] Sent: Thursday, August 10, 2006 3:46 PM To: Ed Murphy Subject: MITCH- Landscaping percentage Ed, I need the know: -the percentage of the gross area including parking, loading and service areas that is landscaped -the percentage of the gross site area that is landscaped I can't find it in the application and iYs not clear from previous approvals on the site. Thanks, Emily � Em li y nE g - RE: MITCH- Landscaping percentage Page 1� From: "Ed Murphy" <MurphyE@paraticompany.com> To: "Emily Eng" <Emily@tigard-or.gov> Date: 8/11/2006 10:30:25 AM Subject: RE: MITCH- Landscaping percentage I may not be able to get to it today. I saw that in 2000 the church added landscaping behind the new addition, and also beefed up the landscaping all along the north property line, so I think it is safe to assume that they complied in 2000. If you visited the site, you saw that it is beautifully and abundantly landscaped. It is probably not terribly important it is to know the exact percentage in this case, since it would be a safe assumption that they meet the standards. Ed From: Emily Eng [mailto:Emily@tigard-or.gov] Sent: Thursday, August 10, 2006 5:38 PM To: Ed Murphy Subject: RE: MITCH- Landscaping percentage � ThaYs the problem. It's not clear from the old decisions what the actual landscape percentage was. In 1994, it was conditioned to be 36.8%. I'm assuming it was met, if they got building permits, but iYs not indicated in any records. In any case, that percentage must have changed somewhat in 2000 and iYs not indicated in the 2000 file. Anyway, I just thought I'd ask. I have to have the hearing packet sent out by Monday with whatever information I have by tomorrow. -Emily »> "Ed Murphy" <MurphyE@paraticompany.com> 08/10 4:33 PM »> Emily-What is the difference between the two percentages? Sounds like the same thing. That will take a little time to figure out, since we did not create the site plan. The last CUP was approved in 2000, and the landscaping was approved at that time. MITCH is not changing the site at all, nor doing anything that would change the landscaping requirements. Couldn't you just state that the landscaping plan was approved in 2000 when the building was expanded, and MITCH is not changing the building or the site, and therefore it meets the landscaping requirements? Ed � Emily Eng - Mitch Carter School Page 1 From: Maris Buxton To: Emily Eng Date: 8/14/2006 10:16:15 AM Subject: Mitch Carter School Emily, Recalcuating the TIF for 160 students, the amount owed would be: $20,625 The Parks fee would be $4,095. (15 staff x$273 = $4,095.) -Maris . � Agenda Item: 2.1 Hearin Date: 8.21.2006 Time: 7:00 PM STAFF REPORT TO THE „ HEARING'S OFFICER =� FOR THE CITY OF TIGARD, OREGON � � REVISED STAFF REPORT: Revisions are indicated in yellow highli�ht SECTION I. APPLICATION SUMMARY FILE NAME: M.I.T.C.H. CHARTER SCHOOL CASE NOS: Conditional Use Permit (CUP) CUP2006-00002 Adjustment (VAR) VAR2006-00069 APPLICANT: 1VI.I.T.C.H. Charter School OWNER: Calvin Presbyterian Church Attn: Debi Lorence 10445 SW Canterbury Lane PO Box 230575 Tigard, OR 97224 Tigard, OR 97223 APPLICANT'S REP: Ed Murphy Parati-LDC Design Group 20085 NW Tanasbourne Drive Hillsboro, OR 97124 PROPOSAL: The applicant is requesting a condirional use pemut to allow the M.LT.C.H. Charter School to operate on the Calvin Presbyterian Church site. The 3.53-acre site includes classrooms, a multi-use area and an outdoor playground that will accommodate the K-7 school. The applicant does not propose any changes to the church exterior or site. In addition, the applicant requests an adjustment to reduce the required number of bicycle parking spaces fxom 48 to 6. LOCATION: 10445 SW Canterbury Lane;WCTM 2S111BC,Tax Lot 2800. ZONING: R-3.5: Low-Densit�Residential District. The R-3.5 zoning district is designed to accommodate detached single-family homes with or without accessory residential units at a minixnum lot size of 10,000 square feet. Duplexes are permitted condirionally. Some civic and institutional uses are also permitted conditionally. APPLICABLE REVIEW CRITERIA: Community Development Code Chapters: 18.330, 18360, 18.370, 18.390, 18.510, 18.705, 18.725, 18.745, 18.755, 18.765, 18.780,�A, 18.795, and 18.810. SECTION II. STAFF RECOMMENDATION Staff recommends that the Hearings Officer find that the proposed Condirional Use Permit will not adversely affect the health, safety and welfare of the City and meets the Approval Standards for a Conditional Use. Therefore, Staff recommends APPROVAL, subject to the following recommended Conditions of A roval: M.I.T.C.H.CH.�RT'ER SCHOOL P.�GE 1 OF 16 CUP2006-00002/�'AR2006-00069 8/21/O6 ST.-1FF REPORT TO THE HE.-1RINGS OFFICER � CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL THE FOLLOWING CONDITIONS SHALL BE SATISFIED PRIOR TO ISSUANCE OF BUILDING PERMITS: Submit to the Current Planning Division (Ernily Eng, (503) 718-2712) for review and approval: 1. The a�plicant shall provide a 6-stall bicycle rack in addition to the existing onsite bicycle rack that is not witivn parkin� aisles, required landscaping or pedestrian ways. A revised plan will be required showing the locanon and specific design and locarion of the reqtured bicycle rack in accordance with standards in Section 18.765.050.A through D of the code. 2. The applicant is hereby norified that generating noise in excess of 50 dBA may result in complaints reguu�lg alteration of acri��iries. The applicant shall certifY that the proposed use will not generate noise in excess of the standards specified m the Tigard Murucipal Code,Chapter 7.40.160. 3. The applicant shall obtain a sign pernut prior to erecting a sign on the site. The subject sign shall comply with the sign code (Chapter 17.780). 4. Based on staff observation of the water quality facilities, staff su�gests that the applicant work with the property owner to replant the water quahty faciliries and unplement a mauitenance plan to mingate the unpacts of not only additional vehicle trips, but current trips. Note: This is a recommendation and not a condition of approval. THE FOLLOWING CONDITION SHALL BE SATISFIED PRIOR TO ISSUANCE OF BUILDING PERMITS: Submit to the Building Department (Brian Blalock, (503) 718-2436) for review and approval: 5. The applicant is required to obtain a building permit for the chan�e of use/occupancy. The applicant shall submit a revised interior floor plan that shows wluch rooms will be used as classrooms. THE FOLLOWING CONDITION SHALL BE SATISFIED PRIOR TO ISSUANCE 4F BUILDING PERMITS: Submit to the Engineering Department (Bethany Stewart, (503) 718-2436) for review and approval: 6. Prior to issuance of a building permit, the applicant shall pay the addressing fee if using an address other than the e�sting address of the proposed site. THE FOLLOWING CONDITIONS SHAI.L BE SATISFIED PRIOR TO A FINAL BUILDING INSPECTION: Submit to the Engineering Department (Kim McMillan, (503) 718-2642) for review and approval: 7. Prior to final building inspection, the applicant shall trim the trees and bushes specified in the Traffic Analysis report m order to unprove sight distance. 8. Prior to final building inspection, the applicant's engineer shall submit final sight distance certification for the three access points. 9. Staff suggests that additional right-of-way be dedicated to the Public along the frontage of 103rd Avenue to uicrease the right-of-way to 27 feet from the centerline. The descriprion shall be tied to the e�sting right-of-way centerline. The dedicarion document shall be on City forms. Instrucrions are available from the Engineering Department. Note: This is recommendation and not a condition of approval. THIS APPROVAL MUST BE IMPLEMENTED WITHIN 18 MONTHS FROM THE EFFECTIVE DATE OF THE HEARINGS OFFICER'S REPORT. Iv1.I.T.C.H.CH.�RT'ER SCHOOL P.-1GE 2 OF 16 CUP2006-00002/Vr1R2006-00069 8/21/06 ST.�FF REPORT TO THE HE.-1RINGS OFFICER � SECTION III. BACKGROUND INFORMATION Pro�osal Descri�tion: The applicant is requesting a conditional use permit to allow the M.I.T.C.H. Charter School to occupy the Calvin Presbyterian Church site. The school offers K-7, has 160 students, and will have 12 teachers and 2 support staff. The school proposes to use the lower level of the church,which includes classxooms, a multi- use area, as well as the e�sting fenced playground on site. The applicant does not propose any changes to the church exterior or site. The property owner will modify the lower level of the building to pYOVide 8 classrooms total (currendy, there are 6 classrooms and additional space that can be converted to 2 classrooms). In addition, the applicant requests an adjustment to reduce the Yequired number of bicycle pasking spaces from 48 to 6. Site and Vicinity Information: The 3.53-acre site is located on the NW coYner of SW Canterbury Lane and SW 103`d Avenue. Adjacent uses include: single-family homes to the north; a parking lot (used and owned by the Calvin Presbyterian Church) and single-family homes across the street to the east; the John TigaYd House and Tigard Water District property to the south; and multi-family housing to the west. The site is in an R-3.5 zone, is adjacent to an R-12 zone to the west and has a slope of approxirriately 3 per cent. Site Historv: The Calvin Presbyterian Church was first built on the e�sting site in 1965. The church made significant expansions in 1992, 1994 and 2000. In 1992, the Ciry approved the construction of a new narthex, fellowship and classroom building containing approximately 5,115 square feet (CUP92-00001). In 1994, the City ap roved the construction of a 9,700-square foot sanctuary (CUP94-00004). In 2000, the Ci� approved a �6,670-sc�uare foot two-story addition to use as classroom space (CUP2000-00002). In ad tion, the church acqwred property across the street from the site on the corner of SW 103Ld r�venue and Inez Street,which the City approved for a parking lot (CUP2001-00002). Concerns Raised by Neighbors: The applicant held a nei�hborhood meeting on July 27, 2006 at 7:00 PM, as documented in the meeting minutes provided with this application (Exhibit 10). All property owners within 500 feet of the subject site were invited. Twelve residents attended the meeting and none had objections to the proposal. Topics discussed include: number of students, where students come from, traffic unpacts, school cuYriculum,recess, special needs students,use of interior space and liability. SECTION IV. REPORT MAKING PROCEDURES, PERMITS AND USE Use Classification ' Secrion 18.130.020 lists the Use Cate�ories. The Calvin Presbyterian Church and M.I.T.C.H. Charter School are different uses within the civic use type. Specifically, the Church is classified as a religious institution and M.I.T.C.H. is classified as a school. Therefore, a change of use will occur if the charter school becomes a tenant of the church site,resulting in a major modification to a conditional use. Summary of Land Use Permits and Decision-making Procedures Section 18.330.020.B.3 states that, upon the Director determining that the proposed modification to the condirional use plan is a majoY modificarion, the applicant shall submit a new application in accordance with Secrion 18.390.050 (Type III-HO pYOCedure). Type III-HO procedures apply to quasi-judicial perniits and actions that predominandy contain discretionary approval criteria. Type III-HO actions are decided by the Hearings Officer with appeals being heaxd by the City Council. The applicant is also requesting reducrion in the required bicycle paiking by means of an adjustrnent, which is processed as a Type II procedure. Staff has recommended a decision to be considered by the Hearings Officer. M.I.T.C.H.CH<�RT'ER SCHOOL P:�GE 3 OF 16 CUP2006-00002/V:'�R2006-00069 8/21/06 ST:�FF REPORT TO THE HE�RINGS OFFICER _ � SECTION V. SUMMARY OF APPLICABLE CRITERIA ' Staff has reviewed the proposal for consistency with the following code sections. Secrion is in Section VI of this ieport. A. Zoning Districts 18.510 - Residential Zoning Districts B. Impact Study 18.390 C. Applicable Development Code Standards 18.330 - Conditional Use 18.360 - Site Development Review 18.370 -Variances and Adjustments 18.705 -Access Egress and Circulation 18.725 - Environmental Perforrnance Standards 18.745 - Landscaping and Screening 18.755 - Mixed Solid Waste and Recyclable Storage 18.7G5 - Off-Street Parking and Loading Requirernents 18.795 -Visual Clearance 18.810 - Street and Utility Improvement Standards SECTION VI. APPLICABLE REVIEW CRITERIA AND FINDINGS A. ZONING DISTRICTS Chapter 18.510 - Residential Zoning Districts Lists the description of the residential Zoning District. The proposed site is in an R-3.5 zone, a low-density residential district designed to accommodate detached single-family homes with or without accessory residenrial units at a minimum lot size of 10,000 square feet. Duplexes are permitted condirionally. Some civic and insriturional uses aYe also perniitted conditionally. The proposed use (school) is permitted conditionally in the R-3.5 zone. B. IMPACT STUDY Section 18.390.040.B.2.e: Impact study. The impact study shall quantify the effect of the developrnent on public facilities and services. The study shall address, at a minimum, the transportation system, including bikeways, the drainage system, the parks system, the water system, the sewer system, and the noise impacts of the development. For each public facility system and type of impact, the study shall propose improvements necessary to meet City standards and to rninimize the impact of the development on the public at large, public facilities systems, and affected private property users. In situations where the Community Development Code requires the dedication of real property interests, the applicant shall either specifically concur with the dedication requirements, or provide evidence which supports the conclusion that the real property dedication requirement is not roughly proportional to the projected impacts of the development. Litde impact is expected on the following systems: parks, watex, sewer and lighting. The applicant does not propose any changes to a1teY these systems or significantly impact them. The pYOposed use does increase traffic to and froin the site. The applicant provided a traffic study, based on a conservarive estimate of the schooPs popularion (K-8, 198 students). The traffic study (EYhibit 13) shows that the school will generate appxo�nately 174 vehicle trips during the morning and 129 trips during the mid-afternoon peak hour of the school. While the morn�ng peak hour of the school coincides with the general morning peak hour of traffic (7:15 AM to 8:15 AlV�, the mid-afternoon peak hour of the school 1(3:00 PM to 4:00 Pl� does not coincide with the general evening commuter traffic (4:45 PM to 5:45 Pl�. The traffic study concludes that the study area intexsecrions will continue to operate at a Level of Service (LOS) B or better during weekday peak hours. The study area intetsections include SW M.I.T.C.H. CHI�RT'ER SCHOOL P.�GE 4 OF 16 CUP2006-00002/V��R2006-00069 8/21/06 ST:�FF REPORT TO THE HE��RINGS OFFICER - Canterbury Lane and SW 103"'rlvenue and SW Inez Street and SW 103"'Avenue. The proposal does not impact the drainage system in that the applicant is not increasing runoff by increasmg unpervious surface area. Therefore, the addirion of the school does not cause the need for additional detention. However, the increase in vehicle trips, as discussed above, may impact water quality by adding pollutants to the current level of storm water runof£ While the applicant does not address un�acts to storm watcr c�uality, staff visitcd thc site and observed that the two on-site water-quality facilities are in poor condition and provide no water quality treatment due to the lack of plantings. No improvements are required; however, staff suggests that the applicant work with the property owner to replant the water quality facilities and implement a maintenance plan to mitigate the impacts of not only additional vehicle trips, but current trips. Some noise impact is expected from the playground during the week. The playground is located on the north side of the school and is separated from adjacent s�ngle family homes by a driveway, 6-foot high fence and a 16 to 20-foot landscape buffer. Some noise in the morning and afternoon is also expected, as students arrive and leave. FINDING: The proposed use will not generate significant impacts. RECOMMENDATION: Staff suggests that the applicant work with the property owner to replant the water c�uality faciliries and implement a maintenance plan to mttt�ate the impacts of not only addtrional vehicle trips, but current trips. This is a recommendahon and not a condition of approval. C. APPLICABLE DEVELOPMENT CODE STANDARDS Chapter 18.330 - Conditional Use Section 18.330.010.A: Purpose. The purpose of this chapter is to provide standards and procedures under which a conditional use may be permitted, enlarged or altered if the site is appropriate and if other appropriate conditions of approval can be met. There are certain uses which due to the nature of the impacts on surrounding land uses and public facilities require a case-by-case review and section. The proposed use (school) requires a conditional use permit in a residential zone. The applicant is requesting approval of a major modification of the Calvin Presbyterian Church site to allow the school to use the site. Section 18.330.030: Approval Standards for a Conditional Use. The Hearings Officer shall approve, ap�rove with conditions, or deny an application for a conditional use or to enlarge or aIter a conditional use based on findings of fact with respect to each of the following criteria: 1. The site size and dimensions provide adequate area for the needs of the �roposed use; The M.I.T.C.H. Charter School is K-7, has an enrollment of 160 students, and will have 12 teachers and 3 support staff. The Calvin Presbystcrian Church is fully devcloped, including a multi-use room, a playground, space for 8 classrooms, parking, lighting and landscaping. The necessary services and infrastructure are available (electric, natural gas, cable, garbage disposal, streets, sewer, storm drainage, and water). The size and dimensions of the Calvin Presbyterian Church site are adequate for the needs of a school. However, it is not clear from the floor plan (Exhibit 7) that the lower level of the church can accommodate 8 classes. The floor plan shows 6 rooms labeled "classrooms." There are also 4 rooms in the space labeled "E�cisting Canton Hall." Per email from the applicant, the property owner will be remodeling the area labeled "E�sting Canton Hall" to provide 2 addinonal classrooms. Prior to receiving building permit(s) to occupy the site, the applicant shall submit a site plan that shows which rooms will be used as classrooms. FINDING: The proposed site is adequate for the needs of the school. However, it is not clear from the floor plan (Exhibit 7) that the lower level of the church can accommodate 8 classes. Criterion #1 will be met when the condition below is satisfied. M.LT.C.H. C�I.IRTER SCHOOL P.-1GE 5 OF 16 CUP200G-00002/�':1R2006-00069 8/21/O6 ST.-1FF REPORT TO THE HE_-1RINGS OFFICER CONDITION: Prior to receiving building permit(s), the applicant shall submit a revised interioY floor plan that shows which rooms will be used as classrooms. 2. The impacts of the proposed use of the site can be accommodated considering size, shape, location, topography and natural features; The school will be a secondary use within the already developed church site and the applicant does not propose any exterior changes. Expected impacts will be minor. There will be some noise impact during recess. The trees and shrubs in the 16 to 20-foot landscaping strip alon� the north boundary of the site will buffer and screen the adjacent properties from playground acnvity and noise. Traffic will be the most significant impact. Accordin� to the traffic study (Exhibit 13), as previously discussed in this report, the school will generate appro�xnately 174 vehicle trips during the morning and 129 trips during the mid-afternoon peak hour of the school. The traffic engineer concluded, based on the full analyses described in the traffic study, that the charter school can be operated on the church site without adversely affecting traffic operations or safery near the site. Key intersections will continue to operate at an acceptable Level of Service with the school's maximum enrollment. The internal circulation system serves the site well, with driveways set far enough back from adjacent intersections to avoid potential traffic conflicts. In addition, employee and school-related parking can be accommodated by the existing parking lot. The traffic engineer observes that some of the exist�ng landscaping is affecting sight distance from the two main driveways. However, the required site distance can be met and even exceeded by trimm;ng some of the e�sting trees and bushes. The applicant shall be required to trim the trees and bushes specified in the Traffic Secnon report in order to unprove sight distance. The applicant's engineer shall submit final sight distance certificanon for the three access points. FINDING: The impacts of the proposed use of the site can be accommodated considering size, shape, location, topography and natural features. However, site distance is somewhat obstructed by overgrown bushes and trees. Because traffic will be the most significant ixnpact, the applicant shall satisfy the conditions below to ensure that the site can accommodate the uicreased traffic flow. CONDITIONS: Prior to fmal building inspection, the applicant shall trun the trees and bushes specified in the Traffic Secrion report m order to unprove sight distance. Prior to fmal building inspection, the applicant's engineer shall submit final sight distance certification for the three access points. 3. All rec�uired public facilities have adequate capaci to serve the proposal; and The site is fully developed and in an area that is fully �eveloped. The apphcant does not propose any changes that would reqwre improvements to public facilities. All required public facilities have adequate capacity to serve the school, as shown below: Streets: The site is served by SW Canterbury Lane and SW 103rd Street. Both streets are fully improved and as concluded from the traffic study (Exhibit 13), have adequate capaciry to serve the school. Howevex, the applicant � � is encouraged to dedicate an additional 2 feet of ROW on SW 103"' l�venue (as discussed on in e Site Development Review (Chapter 18360) section of this report). Water: The site already receives water service and the ap�licant does not propose any changes to the e�sting water service. Therefore, while water usage may be increase somewhat, there is adequate capacity to serve the proposed use. Sanitary Sewer: The site is akeady connected to the sanitary sewer system and the applicant does not propose any changes to the number of fixture units. Per the Engineering Department, no sewer unprovements are required. Therefore, the sewer facility has adequate capaciry to serve the proposal. �_,...__......,. .,.�.,,. a..�,..,.a� .=--------_- -__-- --------, :�f.I.T.C.H.CH.-1RTER SCHOOL P1�GE 6 OF 16 CUP2006-00002/V.�R2006-00069 8/21/O6 ST.-1FF REPORT TO THE HE.�IRINGS OFFICER � Storm Draina�e: T�vo �vater qualiry and detention faciliries are located at the east end of the site, near SW 103rd l�venue. The applicant does not propose increasin� unpervious surface and the addiuonal presence of the school �vill not impact the amount of storm �vater runof£ While the �vater qualitv facilities are not functioning adequatelS� (as discussed in the Impact Stud�� (Chapter 18.390) secrion of this report), the proposed use would not require additional storm drainage facilities. 4. The applicable requirements of the zonin�district are met except as modified by this chapter. The proposed site meets and eiceeds the ininunum dimensional requirements of the R-3.5 zone, as shown below: Table 1. A�plicable Dimensional Standards Required as Stated/ Required Conditional Shown in Dimensional Standard in R-3.5 Use Pro osal Front setback NA 30 ft. 31 ft. Side setback west NA 20 ft. 70 ft. Side setback east NA 20 ft. 235 ft. Rear setback NA 30 ft. 45 ft. 10,000 sq. 153,767 sq. Minimum lot size ft. ft. Avera e minimum lot width 65 ft. 500 ft. Maximum buildin hei ht 30 ft. 42 ft." '*Approved by Ciry in previous decision 5. The applicable requirements of 18.330.050 are met; and The proposed site also meets or exceeds additional dimensional standards for the conditional use type, school, as shown in the previous table. 6. The supplementary requirements set forth in other chapters of this Code including but not limited to Chapter 18.780, Signs, and Chapter 18.360, Site Development Review, if applicable, are met. The applicable review criteria in this case include the following chapters of the Community Development Code: 18.330, Conditional Use; 18.360, Site Development Review; 18.390, Report Maktng Procedures; 18.370, Variances and r�djustments; 18.510, Residenrial Zoning Districts, 18.705, Access, Egress and Circulation; 18.725, Environmental Performance Standards; 18.755, Mixed Solid Waste and Recyclable StoYage Standards; 18.745, Landscaping and Screening; 18.765, Off-Street Parking; 18.780, Signs; 18.795, Visual Clearance Areas; and 18.810 Street and Utility Improvements Standards. All other code chapters axe inapplicable as approval standards. All applicable reqwrements of the code are met. Section 18.330.030.B: Conditions of Approval for a Conditional Use. The Hearings Authoriry may impose conditions on the approval of a conditional use, which are found necessary to ensure the use is compatible with other uses in the viciniry, and that the impact of the proposed use on the surrounding uses and public facilities is minimized. These conditions may include, but are not limited to tfie following: 1. Limiting the hours, days, place and/or manner of operation; School operating hours are 8:60 AM to 3:30 PM. Students generally arrive at 7:45 AM and leave by 3:30 PM. There is no evidence that would require hours of operauon to be lirnited. 2. Rec�uiring design features which minimize environrnental impacts such as noise, vibration, air pollution, �lare, odor and/or dust; This condit�on is not necessary because the existing buffer between the site and the single-family homes already minimi7es noise and visual impacts. 3. Requiring additional setback areas, lot area, and/or lot depth or width; Not necessary/applicable. M.I.T.C.H. CH.�1RT'ER SCHOOL P.-1GE 7 OF 1G CUP2006-00002/V,�R2006-00069 8/21/O6 ST.�FF REPORT TO THE HE.�RINGS OFFICER 4. Limiting the building height, size or lot coverage, and/or location on the site; 1 Not necessary/applicable. 5. Designatin the size, number, location and/or design of vehicle access points; Not necessary�applicable. 6. Requiring street right-of-way to be dedicated and street(s) to be improved; No right-of-way dedicat�on is reqwred. However, staff recommends the foTlowing: ♦ Staff suggests that addiuonal right-of way be dedicated to the Public along the frontage of 103rd Avenue to�ncrease the right-of-way to 27 feet from the centerline. The descripnon shall be tied to the existing right-of-way centerline. The dedication document shall be on City forms. Instrucrions are available fYOm the Engineering Depaxtment. Note: This is recommendation and not a condition of approval. 7. Requiring landscaping, screening, drainage and/or surfacing of parking and loading areas; Not necessary/applicable. 8. Limiting the number, size, location, height and/or lighting of signs; The applicant indicated plans to put up a small sign. Per the sign code (Chapter 18.780), the subject site is allowed the following: ♦ One wall sign, not exceeding 5% of theg�oss area of the wall face per conditional use. ♦ One freestanchng sign, not exceeding 6 feet in height or 32 sc�uare feet per condirional use. ♦ Directional signs, not exceecling 4 square feet per sign per driveway. 9. Limiting or setting standards for the location and/or intensity of outdoor lighting; Not necessary/applicable. 10. Requiring berms, screening or landscaping and the establishment of standards for their installation and maintenance; Not necessary/applicable. 11. Requiring and designating the size, height, location and/or materials for fences; Not necessary/applicable. 12. Requiring the protection and preservation of existing trees, soils, vegetation, watercourses, habitat areas and/or drainage areas; Not necessary/applicable. 13. Requiring the dedication of sufficient open land area for a greenway adjoinin� and within the floodprain when land form alterations and development are allowed within the 100-year floodplain; and Not necessary/applicable. 14. Requiring the construction of a pedestrian/bicycle pathway within the floodplain in accordance with the adopted pedestrian/bicycle pathway plan. Not necessary/applicable. Cha�ter 18.360 - Site Development Review Section 18.360.020.A: A�plicability and exemptions. Site development review shall be applicable to all new developments and ma�or modification of existing developments, except it shall not apply to 18.360.020.A.1 through 10. The �roposed change of use is a major modificarion of an e�sting development that is a conditional use and site development review criteria,where applicable, shall apply. Section 18.360.090.A.1: Compliance with all of the applicable requirements of this title including Chapter 18.810, Street and Utiliry Standards. Section 18.810.030.E: Minimum Rights-of-Way and Street Widths. This section requires a local �Z.I.T.C.H.CH�1RT'ER SCHOOL P1�GE 8 OF 16 CUP2006-00002/�'1�R2006-00069 8/21/06 ST.-1FF REPORT TO THE HE1-�RINGS OFFICER - street to have a 54 right-of-way width and 32-foot paved section. Other improvements required may include on-street parking, sidewalks and bikeways, underground utilities, street lighting, storm drainage, and street trees. This site lies adjacent to SW 103rd r�venue, which is classified as a local street on the City of Tigard Transportation Plan Map. r,t present, there is appro�mately 25 feet of ROW from centerline, accorci�ng to the most recent tax assessor's map. The applicant should dedicate the additional ROW to pro�ride 27 fcct from centerline in accordance with the City's adopted TSP. The applicant also states that the improvements are constructed with sufficient ROW under a previous land use decision. ��e� °c�-�� . While the standards ha�re changed and a Conditional L'�se application must meet the current standards, SW 103"' is a local street �vith existing sidewalks. The City� has no plans to widen the street �e�e€o�e�kc��a=� .. . Therefore, no ROW dedication is required, but staff suggests that the applicant shall pro��ide ROW dedication for a total of 27 feet from centerline. SW 103rd r�venue is currently unproved. The applicant states there is 33-34 feet of pavement width, exceeding the 32 feet required. There is an e�isting 2.5 foot wide planter strip and a 5 foot wide sidewalk. This does not meet the standard, but as a continuauon of e�sting condirions the sidewalk and planter will be accepted as is with this application. The site also lies adjacent to Canterbury Lane, which is classified as a local street on the City of Tigard Transportation Plan Ma . The apphcant states there is 50 feet of ROW. r1t present, there is approxunately 55 feet of�OW, 30 feet of ROW north of centerline. No additional ROW is reqtured. SW Canterbury Lane is currendy improved. The pavement width is 32 feet from curb to curb. There is a wider section where a pull-out occurs. There is a 10 foot wide planter strip and a minimum 6 foot wide sidewalk that is paxtia]Iy in the ROW and partially within an easement. No additional improvements are required. FINDING: SW Canterbury meets the minimum ROW and pavement width, but SW 103`d Avenue does not. Recommendarion: Staff suggests additional right-of-way be dedicated to the public along the fronta�e of 103rd Avenue to increase the right-of-way to 27 feet £rom the centerline. The descripuon shall be tied to the e�sting right-of-way centerline. The dedicarion document shall be on City forms. Instructions are available from the Engineering Department. Note: This is a recommendation and not a condition of approval. ROUGH PROPORTIONALITY ANALYSIS The applicant will be required to pay a Washington County Traffic Impact Fee (TIF) at the time of receivuZg a buildin permtt. Based on a transportation unpact study prepared by Mr. David Larson for the A-Boy Expansion�I�olan II/Resolution 95-61, TIF's are expected to recapture 32 percent of the traffic impact of new development on the Collector and Arterial Street system. Presendy, the TIF for the entite project is estimated at $20,625. These numbers increase by 6% annually and are subject to change as determined at building permit submittal. Since the TIF only mitigates for approxirnately 32 percent of a project's impact, appro�cirriately 68 percent is unmitigated. The actual cost of system unprovements �er tnp generated by new development on the transportatton system can be determuled by the followmg equat�on (Larson, McKenzie Engineering, Dolan Finclings,June 1995): TIF=0.32=100% of the total impact. $20,625 divided by 032 equals $64,453. Since the TIF will mirigate for a porrion of this impact, it is subtracted from the total ($64,453- $20,625=$43,828). Therefoxe, the value of the required exacnons should be roughly proportionate to this remaining$43,828. Estimated Value of Im�acts FullImpact ........................................................................$64,453 Less TIF Assessment..................................................................................................-$20,625 Estimated Value of Unmitigated Impacts............................................................... $43,828 FINDING: Using the above cost factors, it can be deterinined tliat the unmitigated impacts exceed the M.I.T.C.H. CH.-1RT'ER SCHOOL P�GE 9 OF 16 CUP2006-00002/V,�R2006-00069 8/21/06 ST�FF REPORT TO THE HE:-�RINGS OFFICER costs of the conditions imposed and, therefore, the condirions are proportionally justified. ROW dedication has been recommended, but not required. Section 18.810.070.A: Sidewalks. This section equires that sidewalks be constructed to meet City design standards and be located on both sides of arterial, collector and local residential streets. Private streets and industrial streets shall have sidewalks on at least one side. The sidewalk along 103rd Avenue is 5 feet wide and the sidewalk along Canterbury Lane is a minimum of 6 feet wide, thereby meeting this criterion. Section 18.810.090.A: Sewers. There are no proposed changes to the number of f�ture units; therefore no seweY improvements are required. Section 18.810.100.C: Accommodation of Upstream Drainage. There are no upstYeam drainage ways that impact this development. Section 18.810.100.D: Effect on Downstream Drainage. This development ap�licarion does not propose any changes to the impervious suxface area; theYefore additional detention will not be required. Section 18.810.110.A: Bikeway Extension. Developments adjoining proposed bikeways identified on the City's adopted pedestrian/bikeway plan shall include provisions for the future extension of such bikeways through the dedication of easements or right-of-way. Cantexbury Lane and 103rd Avenue are not identified as bicycle facilities. Section 18.810.120: Utilities. All utility lines, but not limited to those required for electric, communication, lighting and cable television services and related facilities shall be placed underground, except for surface mounted transformers, surface mounted connection boxes and meter cabinets which may be placed above ground, temporary utiliry service facilities during construction, high capacity electric lines operating at 50,000 volts or above, and: ♦ The developer shall make all necessary arrangements with the serving utility to provide the under�round services; ♦ The City reserves the right to approve location of all surface mounted facilities; ♦ All underground utilities, including sanitary sewers and storm drains installed in streets by the developer, shall be constructed prior to the surfacing of the streets; and • Stubs for service connections shall be long enough to avoid disturbing the street improvements when service connections are made. Exception to Under-Grounding Requirement: Section 18.810.120.0 states that a developer shall pay a fee in-lieu of under-grounding costs when the developrnent is proposed to take place on a street where existing utilities which are not underground will serve the development and the approval authority determines that the cost and technical difficulty of under-grounding the utilities outweighs the benefit of under-grounding in conjunction with the development. The determination shall be on a case-by-case basis. The most common, but not the only, such situation is a short frontage development for which under-grounding would result in the placement of additional poles, rather than the rernoval of above-ground utilities facilities. An applicant for a develo�ment which is served by utilities which are not underground and which are located across a pubhc right-of-way from the applicant's property shall pay a fee in-lieu of under- grounding. There are existing overhead utility lines along the frontage of SW 103rd Avenue. A fee in-lieu of undexgrounding was paid as a condition of CUP92-0001. Therefore, this condition has been met. Section 18.360.090.A.2: Relationship to the natural and physical environment: a. Buildings shall be: (1) Located to preserve existing trees, topography and natural drainage where possible based upon existing site conditions; (2) Located in areas not subject to ground slumping or sliding; (3) Located to provide adequate distance between adjoining buildings for adequate hght, air circulation, and fire-fighting; and (4) Oriented with consideration for sun and wind. M.LT.C.H. C�-L�RTER SCHOOL P.-�GE 10 OF 16 CUP2006-00002/�'.�R2006-00069 8/21/06 ST1�FF REPORT TO THE HE:IRINGS OFFICER • Because the building is eusting, some of the above requirements do not apply because they apply mainly to new construction. Only the requirements that apply will be addressed. The building is located on the western portion of the site, where the topography is highest. Two stormwater drauiage facilities are located at the east end of the site, where the topography is lowest. Witl1 an ap�roxirnate 3 per cent slope, the building is located in an area that is not slumpuig or sliding. The building is adequate for fire-fighting, based on the fact that Tualatin Valley Fire and Rescue has visited the site and has recommended no conditions of approval. Therefore, the existing building meets the requiremcnts of 18.360A90.A.2 whcre applicable. b. Trees shall be preserved to the extent possible. Replacement of trees is subject to the requirements of Chapter 18.790,Tree Removal. No trees are being removed. Therefore, this criterion is met. Section 18.3G0.090.A.4: Buffering, screening and compatibility between adjoining uses: a. Buffering shall be provided between different types of land uses, for example, between single- family and multiple-family residential, and residential and commercial uses, and the following factors shall be considered in determining the adequacy of the type and extent of the buffer: A landscaped buffer akeady exists between the proposed site and the single-family homes to the north. The buffer separates the homes fYOm a driveway, the parking lot and playground. The eastern and northern boundaries of the site are adjacent to streets; therefore, no buffering is necessary. The western boundary of the site abuts a single-family home and multi-family housing and there is a landscaped strip of mature trees and shrubs along this boundary. Therefore, this cnterion is met. (1) The purp ose of the buffer, for example to decrease noise levels, absorb air pollution, filter dust, or to provide a visual barrier; The purpose of the e�isting buffer is to provide a visual barrier and decrease noise levels from the site. This criterion is met. (2) The size of the buffer required to achieve the purpose in terms of width and hei�ht; The buffer matrix requires level D buffering and screening for a parking lot abutting sin�le-family detached homes. The e�sting landscaped buffer is 16-20 feet wide and includes mature vegetauon (trees and shrubs) and a 6-foot high fence. �"herefore, it meets D2, if not D1, buffering standards, as shown in Table 18.745.2. Single- and multi-family homes neighbor the western boundary of the site and a wide landscaped strip e�sts between the homes and the church site. Therefore, this standard is met. (3) The direction(s) from which buffering is needed; (4) The required density of the buffering; and (5) Whether the viewer is stationary or mobile. The e�sting buffer takes into account the above; therefore, these criteria are met. b. On site screening from view from adjoining properties of such things as service areas, storage areas, parking lots, and mechanical devices on roof tops, i.e., air coohn� and heating systems, shall be provided and the following factors will be considered in determimng the adequacy of the type and extent of the screening: The site provides screening of the parking areas from neighboring homes and public right-of-way. (1) What needs to be screened; (2) The direction from which it is needed; (3) How dense the screen needs to be; (4) Whether the viewer is stationary or mobile; and (5) Whether the screening needs to be year around. and (5) Whether the viewer is stationary or mobile. The existing screening takes into account the above;therefore, these criteria are met. 18.360.090.A.9: Demarcation of public, semi-public and private spaces for crime prevention: a. The structures and site improvements shall be designed so that public areas such as streets or public gathering places, semi-public areas and private outdoor areas are clearly defined to establisb persons having a ri�ht to be in the space, to provide for crime prevention and to establish maintenance responsibility; and The existing site has been designed to provide for crime prevention, as described in the response to 18.360.090.A.9.b below. M.I.T.C.H. CH:-1RTER SCHOOL P.�GE 11 OF 16 CUP2006-00002/V_�R2006-00069 8/21/06 ST�1FF REPORT TO THE HE.�RINGS OFFICER b. These areas may be defined by, but not limited to: (1) A deck, patio, low wall, hedge, or � draping vine; (2) A trellis or arbor; (3) A chan�e in elevation or grade; (4) A change in the texture of the �ath material; (5) Sign; or(6)Y.andscap�ng. The extstin� suvctures on the site are surrounded by asphalt parking areas on three sides. The perimeteY of the site is lined with landscaping, which demarcates the site. The front entrance is clearly visible from the sidewalk and marked by a pathway of different texture than the sidewalk. The on-site �layground is a private outdoor area that is fenced in, allowing only users and occupants of the building to enter it. Therefore, this standard is met. Section 18.360.090.A.10: Crime prevention and safery: a. Windows shall be located so that areas vulnerable to crime can be surveyed by the occupants; b. Interior laundry and service areas shall be located in a way that they can be observed by others; c. Mail boxes shall be located in lighted areas having vehicular or pedestrian traffic; d. The exterior lighting levels shall be selected and the angles shall be oriented towards areas vulnerable to crime; and e. Light fixtures shall be provided in areas having heavy pedestrian or vehicular traffic and in potentially dangerous areas such as parking lots, stairs, rarnps and abrupt grade changes. Fixtures shall be placed at a height so tfiat light patterns overlap at a height of seven feet which is suf�cient to illuminate a person. The school will be located on the lower floor of the e:�isting building, which has windows that provide a view of the playground, an access driveway and the east parking lot. The lower-floor windows will allow school employees to monitor areas that may be vulnerable to crime (i.e. playground or parking lot). The e�sting lighting in the parking lot and at the building entrance provide sufficient lighting for the school, which operates during the day. 18.3G0.090.A.11.a: Public Transit. Provisions within the plan shall be included for providing for transit if the development proposal is adjacent to or within 500 feet of existing or proposed transit route. The site is within 1500 feet of the nearest transit route, which is Hi hway 99W. Because the site is not within 500 fee of an existing or proposed transit route, no provisions �or public transit are necessary. Section 18.360.090.A.12: Landscaping: a. All landscaping shall be designed in accordance with the requirements set forth in Chapter 18.745; The e�cisting landscaping meets current standards more or less. The site is develo�ed with street trees on both SW Canterbury Lane and SW 103rd Avenue, meeting provision 18.745.04 .A. The existing east parking lot is developed with appro�rimately 4-foot landscaped islands that include a mixture of trees and shrubs. The western parking area is separated from the building by a wide landscaped area of trees and shrubs and is screened from adjacent housing by trees and shrubs. Screening of parking/loading areas meets provision 18.745.050.E more or less. b. In addition to the open space and recreation area requirements of subsections 5 and 6 above, a minirnum of 20 percent of the gross area including parking, loading and service areas shall be landscaped; and c.A minimum of 15 percent of the gross site area shall be landscaped. FINDING: The existin� Landscaping was last approved in CUP2000-Q0002. There have been no reductions ui landscapmg suice 2000 and the a�plicant does not propose any reduction the existing landscaping. Therefore, this condition is met. Section 18.360.090.A.13. Drainage: All drainage plans shall be designed in accordance with the criteria in the adopted 1981 master drainage plan; Per Engineering, the e:�isting drainage facilities are adequate for the proposed use. Section 18.360.090.A.14. Provision for the disabled: All facilities for the disabled shall be designed in accordance with the re uirements set forth in ORS Chapter 447; and All ground-level walkways �( ) to building entries are paved with a hard surface and there are 5 disabled- accessible parking spaces closest to the entrance of the building and 2 closest to the school. For the purposes of the school, this standard has been met. M.I.T.C.H. CH��RTER SCHOOL P.�GE 12 OF 16 CUP2006-00002/�T.-1R2006-00069 8/21/O6 ST.�1FF REPORT TO THE HE.�RINGS OFFICER � Section 18.360.090.A.15. All of the provisions and regulations of the underlying zone shall apply unless modified by other sections or this title, e.g., Planned Developments, Chaptet 18.350; or a variance or adjustment�ranted under Chapter 18.370.; (Ord. 02-33) All provisions and regulat�ons of the underlying zone have been met, other than what has been granted a vanance or adjustment. Cha�ter 18.370-Variances and Adjustments The applicant has requested an adjustment to the bicycle parking requirement found in Table 18.765.2,which specifies 6 bicycle parlung spaces per classroom for elementary and junior high school. Section 18.370.020.C.7.e: Reduction in required bicycle parkin� The Director may approve a reduction in required bicycle parking per Section 18.765.050.E by means of Type II procedure, as governed by Section 18.390.040, if the applicant can demonstrate that the proposed use by its nature would be reasonably anticipated to generate a lesser need for bicycle parking. The required number of bicycle parking is 6 spaces per classroom for elementary and juniox high schools. The reason for the required bicycle parking provision is not because each classroom will generate a demand for 6 spaces, but that in sum, the total student body of an elementary or junior high school (K-� will utilize an average of 6 spaces per classroom. However, as described further, the natute of this charter school is that fewer children will nde their bikes to this location. The M.I.T.C.H. Charter School is unlike a neighborhood school because it accepts students from throughout the regional area and not within a specific district. Therefore, it is more likely that students will live further away than what may be a reasonable biking distance for a child. The TSP also does not identify SW 103`� Street or SW Canterbury Lane as bicycle facilities. This combination of factors leads to the conclusion that it is reasonable to reduce the required bicycle parking. Because the school will be utilizing a total of 8 classrooms, it is required to provide 48 birycle parking spaces. However, the applicant has requested a reduction to 6 spaces. The proposed site akeady �rovides a bicycle rack that provides 10 spaces. Staff believes that with 12 teachers, 3 administrators, and 60 K-7`� gr ade students, a m,nimum of 6 bicycle spaces should be adequate in addition to the e�cisting bicycle rack. This should be adequate to accommodate the relative small proportion of bicycle riders. FINDING: It is reasonable to reduce the required bicycle parking, however, adequate provisions for bicycle parking is still required. CONDITION: The applicant shall provide a 6-stall bicycle parking structure in addition to the e�sting onsite bicycle rack that is not within parking aisles, reqwred landscaping or pedestrian ways. A revised plan will be rec�uired showin� the locatron and s�ecific design and location of the required bicycle rack in accordance with standards in Secuon 18.765.050.A through D of the code. Chapter 18.705 -Access, Egress and Circulation Section 18.705.020.A: When provisions apply. The provisions of this chapter shall apply to all development including the construction of new structures, the remodeling of existing structures (see Section 18.360.050), and to a change of use which increases the on-site parking or loading requirements or which changes the access requirements. The proposed use does not cause an increase in required on-site parking or loading, as discussed in the Off-street Parking and Loading (Chapter 18.765) sectton of this report. Therefore, other than what has been addressed in previous sect�ons of this report, access, egress and circulation requirements do not apply. Cha�ter 18.725 - Environmental Performance Standards The purpose of this chapter is to apply federal and state environmental laws, rules and regulations be M.I.T.C.H. CH.-1RTER SCHOOL PAGE 13 OF 16 CUP2006-00002/Z'.1R2006-00069 8/21/06 STAFF REPORT TO THE HE��RINGS OFFICER applied to development within the City of Tigard. Section 18.725.030 regulates: Noise, visible • emissions,vibration,odors and insects and rodents. The proposed charter school is not expected to generate visible emissions, vibrations, or odors that would be detectable beyond the property line. All waste will be stored in closed containers, and the grounds will be maintained in a manner that would not attract insects and rodents. Noise, typical of a children's playground, may be a potential issue as a result during the morning and afternoon drop-off and pick-up tunes and recess during the day. The e�sting buffer along the northern boundary will rrungate the noise. Between the hours of 7 AM and 9 PM the use shall not generate sound levels in excess of 50 dBA when measured at the property line of the adjacent single-family homes. This standard is applicable at all times. FINDING: The applicant does not address how it will mitigate noise, however, the standard can be met if the applicant satisfies the following condition: CONDITION: The ap�licant is hereby notified that generating noise in excess of 50 dBA may result in complaints requiring alteration of activities. The applicant shall certifv that the proposed use will not generate noise in excess of the standards specified in the Tigard Municipal Code, Chapter 7.40.160. Cha ter 18.745 -Landsca in and Screenin Lan scaping and screening standards have a eady been addressed in the Site Development Review (Chapter 18360) section of`this report. Chapter 18.755 - Mixed Solid Waste and Recyclable Stotage Section 18.755.010.B: A�plicabilitv. The mixed solid waste and source separated recyclable storage standards shall apply to new multi-unit residential buildings containing five or more units and non-residential construction that are subject to full site plan or design review; and are located within urban zones that allow, outright or by condition, for such uses. Although this major modificarion is subJect to some site development review standards, the existing site does not fall under the defuutions of "new multi-unit residential buildings...and...non-residential construction that are subJ'ect to full site plan or design review." However, the applicant has provided a letter from Pride Disposal (Exhibit 11) indicating that the site is suitable for disposal service. Chapter 18.765 - Off-Street Parking and Loading Section 18.765.020: Applicability. Change of use. When an existing structure is changed from one use to another use as listed in Section 18.7G5.070, the following provisions shall apply: 1. If the parking requirements for each use are the same, no additional vehicle parking shall be required; 2. Where a change results in an intensification of use in terms of the number of vehicle parking spaces required, additional vehicle parkin� spaces shall be provided in an amount equal to tfie Off-Street Parking and Loading Requzrements 18.765-2 SE Update: 4/OS difference between the number of spaces required for the existing use and the number of spaces required for the more intensive use; 3. Where the change results in a decrease in intensiry of use, the applicant may eliminate excess vehicle parking spaces in an amount equal to the difference between the number of spaces required for the existing use and the number of spaces required for the less intensive use. The proposed addition of the school and change of use does not result in any of the above for vehicle parking spaces, as shown in the response to Secrion 18.765.070 (Minimum and Ma�mum Off-Street Parking Requirements) below. Therefore, the provisions of this section do not apply, other than bicycle parking standards. Section 18.765.070: Minimum and Maximum Off-Street Parking Requirernents H. Specific requirements. (See Table 18.765.2) (Ord. 02-13) The off-street parking requirement for a school is 6 spaces �er classroom. �t 8 proposed classrooms, 16 spaces are required. The site provides 177 spaces and 5 dtsabled-accessible spaces and 29 spaces in the west side parking area primarily used for staf£ In addition, there are 50 parking spaces off-site, which would be available for school use, if necessary. Because regular church hours do not coincide with regular school hours, the school will have access to more than adequate parking. The proposed use also does not :�i.I.T.C.H.CH.�1RT'ER SCHOOL PAGE 14 OF 16 CUP2006-00002/VAR2006-00069 8/21/06 STr�FF REPORT TO THE HE�RINGS OFFICER ' change the access requirements for the site. The proposed use would require one 30-foot access way with 24-foot pavement. The existing site has three access ways of at least 30 feet with 24-foot pavement, which alreadp meets access, egress and circulation requirements. Therefore, the parking standard is already met and no additional spaces are required. Section 18.765.080.A: Off-street loading spaces. The applicant has not proposed a loading space or indicatcd that the school will need a loading space. Therefore, this criterion does not apply. Section 18.390.040.E: Minimum bicycle patking requirements. This provision is addressed in the Vanances and Ad�ustments (Chapter 18.370) secrion of this report. Cha�ter 18.795 -Visual Clearance Areas Section 18.795.020.A: When provisions apply. The provisions of this chapter shall apply to all development including the construction of new structures, the remodeling of existing structures and to a change of use which increases the on-site parking or loading requirements or which changes the access requirernents. The change of use does not increase the on-site pazking or loading requirements or change access requirements. 'Therefore, the provisions of this chapter do not apply, other than what has already been addressed Conditional Use (Chapter 18.330) section of this report. Cha ter 18.810 - Street And Utili Im rovements Standards Street and utiliry standards have already een addressed in the Site Development Review (Chapter 18.360) section of this report. SECTION VII. OTHER STAFF COMMENTS The City of Tigard Police Department has reviewed the proposal and has no objections to it. The City of Tigard Engineerin� Department has reviewed the proposal and has recommended the conditions below, to be sansfied prior to a final building inspection. • Additional right-of-way shall be dedicated to the Public along the frontage of 103rd r�venue to increase the right-of-way to 27 feet from the centexline. The description shall be tied to the e�risting right-of-way centerline. 'I'he dedicarion docurnent shall be on City forms. Instrucrions are available from the Engineering Department. ♦ Prior to final building uispecnon, the applicant shall trim the trees and bushes specified in the Traffic Analysis re�ort in order to unprove sight distance. ♦ Prior to final bwlding inspection, the applicant's engineer shall submit final sight distance certification for the three access points. ♦ The applicant shall either place the e�sting overhead utility lines along SW 103rd Avenue underground as a part of this project, or they shall pay the fee in-lieu of undergrounding. This fee is not required if the applicant, in conjuncnon with the City's Finance Department, can provide evidence of the fee being paid previously. The fee shall be calculated by the fronta�e of the site that is parallel to the utility luies and will be $ 35.00 per lineal foot. If the fee opuon is chosen, the amount will be $ 9590.00 and it shall be paid prior to final building inspection. The Engineering Department also provided the followi�g comment: "The City of Tigard is responsible for assigmng addresses for parcels within the Ciry of Tigard and within the Urban Service Boundary (USB). An addressing fee in the amount of$ 50.00 per address shall be assessed. This fee shall be paid to the City prior to issuance of�ermits. The addressing fee will only be required if the applicant is requesting a new address that is exclusive to the charter school." The Engineering department made the following recommendation: ♦ Prior to issuance of a building permit, the applicant shall pay the addressing fee,if applicable to the charter school. (STAFF CONTACT: Bethany Stewart, Enguleerin�. RESPONSE: Detailed comments are included in the case file and incorporated into the report. The M.I.T.C.H. C�I.�RT'ER SCHOOL P.�GE 15 OF 16 CUP2006-00002/�:3R2006-00069 8/21/06 ST.�FF REPORT TO THE H��RINGS OFFICER applicable condirions of approval ha�-e been included in the staff recommendarion. ' The City of Tigard Building Division has reviewed the proposal and recommended the following condition of approval: • Building permits are required for the change of use. Plans shall indicate all 8 classrooms and their existing facilities. RESPONSE: The applicant is required to obtain a building permit for the change of occupancy. The recommended condition of approval has been included in the staff recommendanon. SECTION VIII. AGENCY COMMENTS Tualatin Valley Fire and Rescue has reviewed the proposal and offered the following comments: "The fire district has no condirions of approval for this proposal. We do have issues with the property owners doin� buildin� modifications unthout the benefit of an appropriate plan review and the issuance of the reqwred pemuts." RESPONSE: TVF&R's concern has been addressed by the condition of approval recommended by the Ciry of Tigard Building Division. � rS Z�o b P PARED B . mil g DATE Assistant Planner </� �• � lS Z v U �e. APPROVED BY: Richard H. Bewer rff DATE Plannuig Manager �f.I.T.C.H. CH.-1RT'ER SCHOOL P��GE 16 OF 16 CUP200G-00002/V_-1R2006-00069 8/21/O6 ST,�FF REPORT TO THE HE.�RINGS OFFICER . GEOGFAPHIC '�NFORM�TION SVSTEM �� Q��P �� __________ � � CUP2006-00002 VAR2006-00069 M.I.T.C.H. C�IARTER , -, � SCHOOL TE �� G / �_' ��\ T °E" �'' �9 6 •� � �i�� CANTERB � ��,,� :, � Q � ��„,� . _ i _,,.�J � ' 9EEF BENO RO..' w � _I . Tigard Nea Map 1 — � � L_.1 N � m � 0 100 200 300 400 Feal MURDOCK ST �=3„,.,�� .s � . . � � B 8 Infortnation on Mis map is for generel bcatbn o�ly and � �B should be verified with the Development Services Division. 13125 SW Hell BWd � Tigard,OR 97223 DELMONTE DR (503)639-4771 m nnP:rn�.�i.��e.or.us Community Development Plot date:Jul 27,2006;C:lmagiclMAGIC03.APR � _ , � . . . � . I � �.s'.e .w wps�mN � . . ...__'. ___'.... ...._ . .. . ... .. . . ...... . . ...... . _ ........._. _.... � __-." ". . ... ... ..._. ..._._.... ... .. .._.. . � . TL..0.14�0.- � � � �r.�n . ...7foo , hEm .AA�... . . - . ... .�aaa... . .. .._ . , ��r�� T�� ...��.��8 � �� .. . ' �� .�.,��`_—_— . . . � E�IMi�.1�'.. ' � ' _?4x�RlL 4,�af1�C , . . .A��s1..� � ' : ; � .�a.ie�w�.. ors��uas. l.ura.�..-` - � , . . .. ' . . ^/ ' � !�lm.iuwF2�':V1i+GA.Y�!:. �BAYJIUJG IA�Q�G�PL Pd�6T1�.1G. mR� Hi4M� ' ..j�'R.�bTAYs:- R . . .�{I+"4RW�lfGI...: G/�-10 GFPML rWGRb. � '�y[�_ . ^ ' .W�W Ri1.19M.tM.. �ra. h�Nb RFeP,Lx�i �o � �e i �' {�"[] �.r i � � � �4 �- --__'�.. .n i � . .. � +i II i .. . � � 2 . / i i r � i � �ki�sMw�� . III II I� ��*.�. ,`� i-�� - �- i �, rc-�" � � . I I I III,I I �. /� `Y � � I� 'o"s, :r�i.v�is aW,m�R_c �E I I s� � e a : � , = ; ��.=.A- _� �,i a = � ,�� .�„�� KrAa�Aq --.'L� � �"_ _J'3 I . I I I I o 1 � ��+.y.ja' . .M t1Ee'-'_ � $• I I I I I.IIII".�I�. .�� _ � . 3 ' � �� I � . � l ns'�'� � , ��:Y W�em�1G.pldm � ' .IIIIIII — III IIII. _ _ i-_�_--�-�� - h+D nt�Y `'3 I �RS.d� _ � j;il IYlfIC�I ��T�6 `� �ACR+�Y'i 1sL +/� ' I. . ' � _—_- .'4�.. _Y�'+°hnLT ',',� T � 1G , � � - .�.,�,�, . "::�� ..a.m,�, „ _�\ �� _ -{ # 7`�e"' - - l � i -�r -_ , .'� -= a�,� , �x-� _- , � d� �'^ � �j = � ; } : � - _._- i�� j � �,* �: . � %j - �A d . � � c � � i � � ?�-'v ....}+h � /��i�i- � ��\ .I �ie��.w c�vrt � � p � cp. � ; Aear+a i-�"" �i��,i� :�.i-�___pt.� �u .� 2��J ��,_�� ut. w�i��o - - �a ; � � �� j .f�'fNto riorsn,_+cd. � v . � � � � +� '. ,, � �� ....._ �� C �td .� V� � � I. .I �F_��T��, ��'. � � �JY.Ok � �� t � a. � �� . 1� � ��.� � J fb.a' � - _ � � � � � - �� .� ��_ __�� - �V O� I � r� � � �.�, _ -_ ....e..�e�� .cr��s °3 a��i I = `t -t--t .'nacq-�wty N y O � � y .. I, . . � . ' � � nvw��rnr+TdJ. j � . 1 c- '�v i . . K � .. .� � �., . � � N v m : � � . �� .. . I. 1 �w".r'E^'a'N) a°— :_ J B � � / ' '.7f�A74L • ; �' ,� y � �:��:.,w.. � i r ° _----- -- � ' a s��'�° . _ � . �' ' . i_ - $�.. - , , ��ti .. ' 'Q19Ylo9YE... .HID� b ' . - . ... __ � .or�+v�i1N+.. - � ' ' ..�.—� � , � ' � � � .�t6_.W 4hNT�ILRa��Y l_�nl.C' . � . . ria -rN ,�,�: ; • 7��7�.,.=:_pL.A.]_1, _ . , , ,�.� . t_._..1°:R�P.o_��r�- �r��z.:1 rzr 1 . ...• :-_.1 .-..2 ca �. _ ' ' . . . , J�A1P11�N� [�t� d�'_ 8-Z�-� � . ' .' __ _,'� ,.n�.r�� . � ' . _..- �,� �� '�.. . . � . ': .�.� -. .. .._. .. ._.�.. , - . . . . � . .��.u,�} - . ... ... .. . ... ... .. _. . _ � .. "�:r,. ,c � • ' � � ' � • � • ' • •; . ��.� � � � ', � � � `'A • � � , � �\� \ :�. �.� sr�e ' ' ' HEARINGS OFFICER MONDAY-AUGUST 21, 200G - 7:00 PM � .1;:i;ti��c l.i,tcnin� 1�c�ic��, ��ir�� .i�.iil:il�lc t�,r j�cr;un; ��ith ini��;iire�l I�c:iriu�; �in�i ;h�>ul�l l�c �chr�iulc�l t�,r f Ieariu�; Othcer n�cctin�;; by noon on the Friday prior to the meering. Please call 503-639-4171, Ext. 2438 (voice) or 503-6842772 (1DD - Telecommunications Devices for the Dea�. Upon request, the City will also endeavor to arrange for qualiFed sign language interpreters for persons with speech or hearing impairments and qualified bilingual interpreters. Since these services must be scheduled with outside service providers, it is important to allow as much lead time as possible. To request such services, please norify the City of Tigard of vour need(s) by 5:00 p.m., no less than one (1) week prior to the meeting date at the same phone numbers listed above so that we can make the appropriate arrangements. Hearings are held in Town Hall at the City of Tigard at 13125 SW Hall Boulevard Staff reports are available to the public 7 days prior to the hearing date 1. CALL TO ORDER 2. PUBLIC HEARING 2.1 M.I.T.C.H. CHARTER SCHOOL CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT (CUP) 2006-00002 1�DJL'ST�IENT (�'�R) 2006-00069 REQUEST: The applicant is requesting Condirional Lse Permit to allow the M.LT.C.H. Charter School to occupy classroom space in the Calvin Presbyterian Church. �i.I.T.C.H. is K-8 and has approximately 198 students. The school will lease the lower level of the church, which has 8 classrooms and a commons area. The school will also have access to a fenced playground on site. The applicant does not propose any changes to the church exterior or site. In addition, the applicant requests an Adjustment to the bicycle parking standard of 6 spaces per classroom. The applicant desires to reduce the required number of bicycle parking spaces from 48 to G. LOCATION: 10445 SW Canterburv Lane;Washington County Tax Map 2S111BC,Tax Lot 2800. ZONE: R-3.5: Low-Density Residential District. The R-3.5 zoning district is designed to accommodate detached single-family homes with or without accessor�� residential units at a minimum lot size of 10,000 square feet. Duplexes are permitted condirionall��. Some ci�-ic and institutional uses are also permitted conditionall��. APPLICABLE REVIEW CRITERIA: Communiry Development Code Chapters: 18.330, 18.360, 18.390, 18.510, 18.705, 18.725, 18.745, 18.755, 18.765, 18.780, 18.790, 18.795,and 18.810. 3. OTHER BUSINESS 4. ADJOURNMENT Page 1 of 1 Agenda Item: 2.1 Hearin Date: 8.21.2006 Time: 7:00 PM STAFF REPORT TO THE �� HEARING'S OFFICER : FOR THE CITY OF TIGARD, OREGON � � � SECTION I. APPLICATION SLTMMARY � FILE NAME: M.I.T.C.H. CHARTER SCHOOL CASE NOS: Condidonal Use Pernut(CLJI') (,'LJP2006-00002 Adjustment (VA� VAR2006-00069 APPLICANT: M.I.T.GI� Charter School OWNER Calvin Presbyterian Church Attn:Debi Lorence 10445 SW Canterbury Lane PO Box 230575 Tigarci,OR 97224 T'igard,OR 97223 APPLICANT'S REP: Ed Murphy Parati- LDC Design Group 20085 NW Tanasbourne Dnve I-i�illsboro,OR 97124 PROPOSAL: The applicant is requesting a conditional use pemiit to allow the M.I.T.G� Gharter School to operate on the Calvin Presbyterian Church site. The 3.53-acre site includes classrooms, a multi-use area and an outdoor playground that will accommodate the K-7 schooL The applicant does not propose any changes to the church exterior or site. In addition,the applicant requests an adjustment to reduce the required number of bicycle parking spaces from 48 to 6. LOC.ATION: 10445 SW CanterburyLane;WGTM 2S111BC,Tax Lot 2800. ZOIVINC�.� R 3.5: Low Density Residential District. The R 3.5 zoning district is designed to accommodate detached sin�le-family homes with or without accessory residential units at a minunum lot s�ze of 10,000 square feet. Duplexes are perinitted conditionally. Some civic and institutional uses are also pernutted conditionally. APPLICABLE RE VIE W CRITERIA: Community Development Code Chapters: 18.330, 18.360, 18.390, 18.510, 18.705, 18.725, 18.745, 18.755, 18.765, 18.780, 18.790, 18.795,and 18.810. SE CTI ON II. STAFF RE COMME NDATI ON Staff recommends that the Hearuigs Officer find that the proposed Conditional Use Permit will not adversely affect the health, safety and welfare of the City and meets the Approval Standards for a Conditional Use. Therefore, Staff recommends APPROVAL, subject to the following recommended Conditions of roval: MI.T.G�L C�IARTER SC�IOOL PAGE 1 OF 16 CtJP200Er00002/VAR2006-00069 8/21/06 STAFF REPORT TO TT�E HEARINGS OFFIC�R CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL HE LL N N I I NS H L BE S ISFIED PRIOR TO ISSU.ANCE OF BUILDING PERMITS: u mrt to e urrent anning ivision Emi y Eng, 503 718-2712 or review an approva : 1. The applicant shall provide a 6-stall bicy�le rack that is not within parking aisles, requ.ired landscaping or pedestrian ways. A revised plan will be required showing the locat�on and specific design and location of the required bicy�le rack in accordance with standards in Section 18.765.050.A through D of the code. 2. The applicant is.hereby notified that generating noise in excess of 50 dBA may result in complaints requiruig alterat�on of activities. The applicant shall certify that the pro�posed use will not generate no�se in excess of the standards specified m the T"igard Murucipal Cflde,C�apter 7.40.160. 3. The applicant shall obtain a sign pernut prior to erecting a sign on the site. The subject sign shall comply with the sign code (Chapter 17.7g0). 4. Based on staff observation of the water quality facilities, staff suggests that the applicant work with the.property owner to replant the water quality facilities and unplement a mamtenance� �plan to mingate the impacts of not only additional velucle trips, but current trips. Note: TFus is a recommendation and not a condition of approval. HE F LL WIN N I I N L BE -I FIED PRIOR TO ISSUANCE OF BLTILDING PERMITS: u irut to e Bui ing partment Bnan B a oc , 503 718-2436 or review an approva : 5. The applicant is required to.obtain a.building permit for the change of useloccupancy. The applicant shall submit a rev�sed intenor floor plan that shows which rooms will be used as cIassrooms. HE F LL WIN N I I N L BE I FIE PRIOR TO ISSUANCE OF BUILDING PERMITS: u rrut to e Engineenng Department Be ny Stewart, 503 718-2436 or review an approva : 6. Prior to issuance of a building permit,the applicant shall pay the addressing fee if using an address other than the existi.ng address of the proposed site. LL WIN N I IONS S L BE S I FIED PRIOR TO A FINAL BUILDING INSPECTION: u rYUt to e Engir►eenng partment Kun McMi an, 503 718-2642 or review an approva : 7. Prior to final building_inspection,.the applicant shall trim the trees and bushes specified in the Traffic Analysis report m order to unprove sight distance. 8. Prior to final building inspection, the applicant's engineer shall submit final sight distance certification for the three access points. 9. Staff suggests that additional right-of-way be dedicated to the Public along the front-ag�e of 103rd Avenue to increase the right-of:wayto 27 feet from the centerline. The description shall be tied to the e�stingr�ht-of-way centerluie. The dedication document shall be on City f om�s. Instructions are available }rom the Engineering Department. Note: This is recommendation and not a condition of approval. HI R L MEN E WI HI 18 M N HS FROM THE EFFECTIVE DATE OF THE HEARINGS OFFICER'S REPORT. MI.T.GH CHARTER SC�-i00L PAGE 2 OF 16 CUI'200(r00002/VAR2006-00069 8/21/06 STAFF REPORT TO TT�E HEARINGS OFFIC�R SECTION III. BACKGROUND INFORMATION Pro osal Descri tion: e app 'cant is requesting a conditional use pernut to allow the M.I.T.C.H. Charter School to occupy the Calvin I'resbytenan Church site. The school offers K-7 has 160 students and will have 12 teachers and 2 support staff. The school proposes to use the lower leve�l of the church,w�iich includes classrooms, a multi- use area, as well as the existin�fenced playground on site. The applicant does not propose any chan�es to the church exterior or site. The property owner will modify the Iower level of the building to provide 8 classrooms total (currently, there .are 6 classrooms and additional space that can be converted to 2 classrooms). In addition, the apphcant requests an adjusunent to reduce the required number of bicyCle parking spaces from 48 to 6. Site and Vicini Information: e 3.53-acre site is ocate on the NW corner of SW Canterbury Lane and SW 103� Avenue. Adjacent uses include: single-family homes to the north; a parking lot (used and owned by�the Calvin Presbyterian Church) and single-family homes across the street to the east; the John Tigard House and Tigard Water District property to the south; and multi-family housing to the west. The site is in an R 3.5 zone, is adjacent to an R 12 zone to the west and has a slope of approximately 3 per cent. Site Histo . The Calvin Presbyterian Church was fust built on the existing site in 1965. The church made sig ��xpansions in 1992, 1994 and 2000. In 1992, the City approved the construction of a new narthex,fellowship and classroom building containing approximately 5,I15 s uare feet (CUP92-00001). In 1994, the Ca a proved the construction of a 9,700-square foot sanctuary(CUP9400004). In 2000, the City approved a16,670-square foot two-story addition to use as classroom space (CCJP2000-00002). In addit�on, the church acguu-ed property across the street from the site on the corner of SW 103 Avenue and Inez Street,which tFie City approved for a parking lot (C[JP2001-00002). Concerns Raised b Nei hbors: The applicant held a neighborhood meeting�on July 27 2006 at 7:00 PM, as ocumente in e meeting minutes provided with this application (Ex.hibit 10). A�l properry owners within 500 feet of the subject site were invited. Twelve residents attended the meeting and none had objections to the prop osal. Topics discussed include: number of students, where students come from, traffic impacts,schooicurriculurr�,recess,special needs studenu,use of interior space and liabiliry. SECTION IV. REPORT MAHING PROCEDURES, PERMITS AND USE Use Classification Section 18.130.020 lists the Use Categories. The Calvin Presbyterian Church and M.I.T.G�-L Charter School are different uses within the civic use type. Specifically, the Church is classified as a religious institution and M.I.T.C.�L is classified as a school. Therefore, a change of use will occur if the charter school becomes a tenant of the church site,resulting in a major modification to a conditional use. Summary of Land Use Permits and Decision-making Procedures Section 18.330.020.B.3 states that, upon the Director deterniining that the proposed modification to the conditional use plan is a major modification, the applicant shall submit a new application in accordance with Section 18.390.050 (Type III-HO procedure). Type III-HO procedures apply to quasi-judicial permits and actions that predominantly contain discretionary approval criteria. Type III-HO actions are decided by the Hearings Officer with appeals being heard by the City Council. The applicant is also re9u�esting reduction in the required bicy�le parkirig by means of an adjustment, which �s processed as a Type II procedure. Staff has recommended a decision to be considered by the Hearings Officer. SECTION V. SL:fMMARY OF APPLICABLE CRITERIA Staff has reviewed the proposal for consistencywith the following code sections. Section is in Section VI of this report. M.I.T.GH CHARTER SCHOOL PAGE 3 OF 16 CUP200(r00002/VAR2006-00069 8/21/06 STAFF REPORT TO TI�HEARINGS OFFIC�R ' SECTION V. SUl�._.iARY OF APPLICABLE CRITE. � Staff has reviewed the proposal for consistency with the following code secrions. Secrion is in Secrion VI of this report. A. Zoning Districts 18.510 - Residential Zoning Districts B. Impact Study 18.390 C. Applicable Development Code Standards 18.330 - Conditional Use 18.360- Site Development Review 18.370-Variances and Adjustments 18.705 -Access Egress and Citculation 18.725 - Environmental Performance Standards 18.745 - Landscaping and Screening 18.755 - Mixed Solid Waste and Recyclable Storage 18.765 - Off-Street Parldng and Load.ing Requirements 18.795 -Visual Clearance 18.810 - Street and Utiliry Improvement Standards SECTIQN VI. APPLICABLE REVIEW CRITERIA AND FINDINGS A. ZONING DISTRICTS Chapter 18.510 - Residential Zoning Districts Lists the description of the residential Zoning District. The proposed site is in an R-3.5 zone, a low-density residential district designed to accommodate detached single-family homes with or without accessory residential units at a minimum lot size of 10,000 square feet. Duplexes aze permitted conditionally. Some civlc and institutional uses are also pemutted conditionally. The proposed use (schoo� is pemutted conditionally in the R-3.5 zone. B. IMPACT STUDY Section 18.390.040.B.2.e: Impact study. The impact study shall quantify the effect of the development on public facilities and services. The study shall address, at a muumum, the transportation system, includ.ing bikeways, the drainage system, the parks system, the water system, the sewer system, and the noise impacts of the development. For each public facility system and type of impact, the study sha11 propose improvements necessary to meet Ciry standards and to minimize the unpact of the development on the public at large, public facilities systems, and affected private property usets. In situations where the Community Development Code req�uires the ded.ication of real property interests, the applicant shall either specifically concur wrth the dedication requirements, or provide evidence which supports the conclusion that the real property dedication requirement is not roughly proportional to the projected impacts of the development. Little impact is expected on the following systems: patks, water, sewer and lighting. The applicant does not propose any changes to alter these systems or significantly itnpact them. The proposed use does increase traffic to and from the site. The applicant provided a traffic study, based on a conservative estimate of the school's population (K-8, 198 students). -The traffic study (Exhibit 13) shows that the school will generate approxunately 174 vehicle tri�s during the morning and 129 trips durin the mid-afternoon peak hout of tlie school. While the morning peak hour of the school coincides with �e general morning peak hour of traffic (7:15 AM to 8:15 AIV�, the mid-aftemoon peak hour of the school 13:00 PM to 4:00 PIv� does not coincide with the general evening commuter traffic (4:45 PM to 5:45 PM�. The traffic study concludes that the study area intersections will continue to operate at a Level of Servlce (LOS) B or better during weekday peak hours. The study area intersections include SW M.I.T.C.H.CHARTER SCHOOL PAGE 4 OF 16 CUP2006-00002/VAR2006-00069 S/21/06 STAFF REPORT TO THE HEARINGS OFFTCER ' �Canterbury Lane and SW 103`' enue and SW Inez Street and SW 103`' _�Jenue. The proposal does not unpact the drainage system in that the applicant is not increasing nznoff by increasmg unpervious surface area. Therefore, the addition of the school does not cause the need for addirional detention. However, the increase in vehicle trips, as discussed above, may impact water quality by adding pollutants to the current level of stortn water runoff. While the applicant does not address impacts to storm water c�ualiry, staff visited the site and observed that the two on-site water-quality facilities are in poor condition and provide no water quality treatment due to the lack of plantings. No improvements are required; however, staff suggests that the applicant work with the property owner to replant the water qualiry facilities and implement a maintenance plan to mitigate the impacts of not only additional vehicle trips,but current trips. Some noise impact is expected from the playground during the week. The playground is located on the north side of the school and is separated from adjacent smgle family homes by a driveway, 6-foot high fence and a 16 to 20-foot landscape buffer. Some noise in the moriung and aftemoon is also e�ected, as students arrive and leave. FINDING: The proposed use will not generate significant impacts. RECOMMENDATION: Staff suggests that the applicant work with the property owner to replant the water c�uality � facilities and implement a ma.intenance plan to mit�ate the impacts of not only additional vehicle trips,but current trips. This is a recommendanon and not a condition of approval. C. APPLICABLE DEVELOPMENT CODE STANDARDS Chapter 18.330 - Cond.itional Use Section 18.330.O10.A: Purpose. The purpose of this cha ter is to provide standards and procedures under which a conditional use may be permittec� enlarged or altered if the site is appropriate and if other appropriate conditions of approval can be met. There are certain uses wliich due to the nature of the impacts on surrounc�ing land uses and public facilities require a case-by-case review and section. The proposed use (school) requires a conditional use permit in a residential zone. The applicant is requesting approval of a major modification of the Calvin Presbyterian Church site to allow the school to use the site. Section 18.330.030: Approval Standards for a Conditional Use. The Hearings Officer shall approve, ap�rove with conditions, or deny an application for a conditional use or to enlarge or aIter a conditional use based on findings of fact with respect to each of the following criteria: 1. The site size and dimensions provide adequate area for the needs of the Qroposed use; The M.I.T.C.H. Charter School is K-7, has an enrollment of 160 students, and w�ll have 12 teachers and 3 support staff. The Calvin Presbysterian Church is fully developed, including a mulri-use room, a playground, space for 8 classrooms, parking, �hting and landscapuig. The necessary services and inftastructure are available (electric, natural gas, ca le, garbage disposaI, streets, sewex, storm drainage, and water�. The size and dimensions of the Calvin Presbyterian Church site are adequate for the needs of a school. However, it is not clear from the floor plan (E�ibit � that the lower level of the church can accommodate 8 classes. The floor plan shows 6 rooms ]abeled "classrooms." There are also 4 rooms in the space labeled "E�sting Canton Hall." Per email from the applicant, the property owner will be remodeling the area labeled "Existing Canton Hall" to provide 2 addinonal classrooms. Pnor to receiving building permit(s) to occupy the site, the applicant shall submit a site plan that shows which rooms will be used as cIassxooms. FINDING: The roposed site is adequate for the needs of the school. However, it is not clear from the floo r plan (Exhibit 7) that the lower level of the church can accommodate 8 classes. Criterion #1 will be met when the condition below is satisfied. M.I.T.C.H.CHARTER SCHOOL PAGE 5 OF 16 CUP2006-00002/VAR2006-00069 8/21/06 STAFF REPORT TO THE HEARINGS OFFICER CONDITION: Prior to receiving building permit(s), the applicant shall submit a revised interior floor plan that shows which rooms wiIl be used as classrooms. 2. The impacts of the proposed use of the site can be accommodated considering size, shape, location, topography and natural features; The school will be a secondary use within the already developed church site and the applicant does not propose any exterior changes. Expected impacts will be minor. There will be some noise impact during recess. The trees and shrubs in the 16 to 20-foot landscaping strip a1on� the north boundary of the site will buffer and screen the adjacent properties from playground acnviry and noise. Traffic will be the most significant impact. Accordin� to the traffic study (Exhibit 13), as previously discussed in this report, the school will generate approxunately 174 vehicle tnps during the momtng and 129 trips during the mtd-afternoon peak hout of the school. The traffic engineer concluded, based on the full analyses described in the traf�c study, that the charter school can be operated on the church site without adversely affecting t$affic operations or safety near the site. Key intersecrions will continue to operate at an acceptable Level of Service with the school's maximum enrollment. The internal circulation system seroes the site well, with driveways set far enough back from adjacent intersections to avoid potential traffic conflicts. In addition, employee and school-related parking can be accommodated by the e�usring parking lot. The traffic engineer observes that some of the extsting landscaping is affecting s ht distance from the two main driveways. However, the required site distance can be met and even excee�ed by rrimmin� some of the existing trees and bushes. The applicant shall be required to trim the trees and bushes specified in the Traffic Secnon report in order to unprove sight distance. The applicant's engineer shall submit final sight distance certificatton for the three access pomts. FINDING: The impacts of the proposed use of the site can be accommodated considering size, shape, location, topography and natural features. However, site distance is somewhat obstructedby over�town bushes and trees. Because traffic will be the most significant impact, the apphcant shall satisfy the conditions below to ensure that the site can accommodate the mcreased traffic flow. CONDITTONS: Prior to final building inspection, the applicant shall trim the trees and bushes specified in the Traffic Section report in order to unprove sight distance. Prior to final building inspection, tlie applicant's engineer shall submit final sight distance certification for the three access pomts. 3.All rec�uired public facilities have adequate capacit�to serve the proposal; and The site is fully developed and in an area that is fully developed. The apphcant does not propose any changes that would reqwre improvements to public facilities. All required public facilities have adequate capacity to seroe the school,as shown below: Streets: The site is served by SW Canterbury Lane and SW 103rd Street. Both streets are fully improved and as concluded from the traffic study (Exhibit 13), have adequate capacity to serve the school. However, the applicant shall be required as a condition of approval to dedicate an additional 2 feet of ROW on SW 103`�Avenue (as discussed on in the Site Develo pment Review (Cha pter 18.360) section of this report). Water: The site akeady receives water service and the ap�licant does not propose any changes to the existing water service. Therefore,while water usage may be mcrease somewhat, there is adequate capaciry to serve the proposed use. Sanitary Sewer: The site is akeady connected to the sanitary sewer system and the applicant does not propose any changes to the number of fixture units. Per the Engineering Department, no sewer unprovements are requixed. Therefore, the sewer facility has adequate capacrty to serve the proposal. M.I.T.C.H.CHARTER SCHOOL • PAGE 6 OF 16 CUP2006-00002/VAR2006-00069 8/21/O6 STAFF REPORT TO THE HEARINGS OFFICER °��.4B�.�.1�.5�4.� �I�'F.i.�D��TAN��15�i�5I3��1'TI,�iZ�h"'FS sr:�.�.� �.t. r� �.aa � $-a a��c�s:� -Ii�iad wriL �dDD rq.R "�J�OP►�}!E 1Gd0i1�y�L 7,50Q arjil. 5,006�q � -� ]0�11]D.a�.1 L{lA6d�}.1k -J411aet�et!un� Q �{� � .A�ver�e 3�rr�E�aa V69d[A -i3�e�rcied waK]en 1QfY� 74f!!L dS A. �d it 54l� -Tkt�iaet fats 9D� 4G 1� 50�L -Amctwi uoie lon� W�. l�ibdura�L et - - - - �M! 3 )+&neirruue Set6Mtid -7F�oet yaM 3l#it 30 it 2Q t 20 R t 3!t -B(de�1lhhY�p craf�r�l�3aet 2d R 3DlL �fl! 1S R IO�ft -8t8t yt� 5 t. 5 i! S!l. S�, S tk -Rsv 3nrrd 35 R 3i!t [5 w 13 R !3!L -Si�tr ar►eyr yani rluni�t�u�e eti��tietfNa�iu�dstr�n 30 iL -A�iatmt�tEq�peo�e�'Rat �sd 6nrt ad 2tf R 1'�!t 20 i �D R 3D�L �tretitYUm 3d� 3Q fL 3Q IL 34 ft 3i il 3�ierur - - - - ;� �1]9ie�1°�itr�ip wuc�od ersi3o�ufri�nr�►�t+r,ara"mad atape�tUit�peve iet riih u4 a�oee fh+��+�r�mrrlwi+�►in ri aae�- [1'J Ltt edi�drrp kreloder rll brl{6�p r�A l�aerror�e irQ+t� 5.The applicable requirements of 18.330.050 are met; and The proposed site also meets or exceeds additional ditnensional standards for the conditional use type, school, as shown in the previous table. 6. The supplementary requirements set forth in other chapters of this Code including but not limited to Chapter 18.780, Signs, and Chapter 18.360, Site Development Review, if applicable, are met. The applicable review criteria in this case include the following chapters of the Community Development Code: 18.330, Conditional Use; 18.360, Site Development Review; 18.390, Report Making Procedures; 18370, Variances and Adjustments; 18.510, Residential Zoning Districts, 18.705, Access, Egtess and Circulation; 18.725, Environmental Performance Standaxds; 18.755, Mixed Solid Waste and Recyclable Storage Standards; 18.745, Landscaping and Screening; 18.765, Off-Stteet Parking; 18.780, Signs; 18.795, Visual Clearance Areas; and 18.810 Street and Utility Improvements Standards. All other code chapters are inapplicable as approval standards. All applicable reqi.urements of the code are met. Section 18.330.030.B: Conditions of Approval for a Conditional Use. The Hearings Authority may impose conditions on the approval of a cond.itional use, which are found necessary to ensure the use is compatible with other uses in the vicinity, and that the impact of the proposed use on the sunounding uses and public facilities is minimized. These cond.itions may include, but are not limited to the following: 1. Limiting the hours, days,place and/or manner of operation; School operating hours are 8:00 AM to 3:30 PM. Students generally arrive at 7:45 AM and leave by 330 PM. There is no evidence that would xequire hours of operanon to be limited. 2. Rec�uiring design features which minimize environmental impacts such as noise, vibration, air pollution, �lare, odor and/or dust; �'his condihon is not necessary because the e�sting buffer between the site and the single-family homes already minimi>es noise and visual impacts. 3. Requiring additional setback areas, lot area, and/or lot depth or width; M.I.T.C.H. CHARTER SCHOOL PAGE 7 OF 16 CUP200G-00002/VAR2006-00069 8/21/O6 STAFF REPORT TO THE HEARINGS OFFICER ' �Not necessary/applicable. 4. Limiting the building height, size or lot coverage, and/or location on the site; Not necessary/applicable. 5. Designati the size, number, location and/or design of vehicle access points; Not necessary�applicable. 6. Requiring street right-of-way to be dedicated and street(s) to be improved; No right-of-way dedicanon is required. However, staff recommends the foIlowing: ♦ Staff suggests that addiuonal right-of-way be dedicated to the Public along the frontage of 103rd Avenue to uicrease the right-of-way to 27 feet from the centerline. The description shall be tied to the e�sting right-of-way centerline. The dedication document shall be on Ciry forms. Instructions are available from the Engineering Departrnent. Note: This is recommendation and not a condition of approval. 7. Requiring landscaping, screening, drainage and/or surfacing of parking and loading areas; Not necessary/applicable. 8. Limiting the number, size, location,he�ght and/or lighting of signs; The applicant indicated plans to put up a small sign. Per the sign code (Chapter 18.780), the subject site is allowed the following: ♦ One wall sign, not exceeding 5% of thegross area of the wall face er conditional use. • ♦ One freestanding sign,not exceeding 6 feet in height or 32 sc�uare �eet per conditional use. ♦ Direcrional signs,not exceeding 4 square feet per sign pex dnveway. 9. Limiting or setting standards for the location and/or intensity of outdoor lighting; Not necessary/applicable. 10. Requiring berms, screening or landscaping and the establishment of standards for their installation and maintenance; Not necessary/applicable. 11. Requiri.ng and designating the size,height,location and/or materials for fences; Not necessary/applicable. 12. Requiring the protection and preservation of existing trees, soils, vegetation, watercourses, habitat areas and/or drainage areas; Not necessary/applicable. 13. Requiring the dedication of sufficient open land area for a greenway adjoinin� and within the floodplain when land form alterations and development are allowed within the 100-year floodplain;and Not necessaty/applicable. 14. Requirin� the construction of a pedestrian/bicycle pathway within the floodplain in accordance with the adopted pedestrian/bicycle pathway plan. Not necessary/applicable. Cha�ter 18.360 - Site Develo�ment Review Section 18.360.020.A: A�plicabilitv and exemptions. Site development review shall be applicable to all new developments and ma�or om d cafi tion of existing developments, except it shall not apply to 18.360.020.A.1 through 10. The �roposed change of use is a major modification of an e�sting development that is a conditional use and srte development review criteria,where applicable, shall apply. Section 18.360.090.A.1: Compliance with all of the applicable requirements of this tide including Chapter 18.810, Stteet and Utiliry Standards. M.I.T.C.H.CHART'ER SCHOOL PAGE 8 OF 16 CUP200G-00002/VAR2006-00069 8/21/O6 STAFF REPORT TO THE HEARINGS OFFICER ' Section 18.810.030.E: Minin_ .i Rights-of-Way and Street Widths. i'his section requires a local street to have a 54 right-of-way width and 32-foot paved section. Other im�rovements required may include on-street parking, sidewalks and bikeways, underground utihties, street ligf�ting, storm drainage, and street trees. This site lies adJ�acent to SW 103rd Avenue, which is classified as a local street on the City of Tigard Transportation Plan Map. At �resent, there is approximately 25 feet of ROW from centerline, accorcling to the most recent tax assessor s map. 'I'he applicant should dedicate the addirional ROW to provide 27 feet from centexline in accordance with the City's adopted TSP. The applicant also states that the unprovements are constructed with sufficient ROW under a previous land use decision. Howevet, the standards have changed and a Conditional Use application must meet the current standards. "I'herefore, the applicant shall provide ROW dedication for a total of 27 feet from centerline. SW 103rd Avenue is currently unproved. The applicant states there is 33-34 feet of pavement width, exceeding the 32 feet required. There is an existing 2.5 foot wide planter strip and a 5 foot wide sidewalk. This does not meet the standard, but as a continuanon of existing conditions the sidewalk and planter will be accepted as is with this application. The site also lies adjacent to Canterbury Lane, which is classified as a local street on the City of Tigard Transportation Plan Map. The apphcant states there is 50 feet of ROW. At present, there is appro�mately 55 feet of I�OW, 30 feet of ROW north of centeYline. No additional ROW is required. SW Canterbury Lane is currently unproved. The pavement width is 32 feet from curb to curb. There is a wider secnon where a pull-out occurs. There is a 10 foot wide planter strip and a minimutn 6 foot wide sidewalk that is partia.11y in the ROW and partially witivn an easement. No additional improvements are required. FINDING: SW Canterbury meets the minimum ROW and pavement width, but SW 103� Avenue does not. Recommendation: Staff suggests additional right-of-way be dedicated to the public along the fronta�e of 103rd Avenue to increase the right-of-way to 27 feet from the centerline. The descriptton shall be tied to the e�usting right-of-way centerline. The dedication document shall be on City forms. Instructions are avatlable from the Engineering Department. Note: This is a recommendation and not a condition of approval. ROUGH PROPORTIONALITY ANALYSIS The a�plicant will be required to pay a Washington County Traffic Impact Fee �F� at the time of receivuig a buildin permit. Based on a transportatton impact study prepared by Mr. avld Larson for the A-Boy Expansion�Dolan II/Resolution 95-b1, TIF's ate e�cpected to recaptute 32 percent of the traffic impact of new development on the Collector and Arterial Street system. Presendy, the TIF for the entire pro�ect is esrimated at $20,625. These numbers increase by 6% annually and are subject to change as determined at building pernut submittal. Since the TIF only mirigates for approximately 32 percent of a project's impact, approximately 68 percent is unmitigated. The actual cost of system improvements �er tap generated by new development on the transportat�on system can be detetmined by the follow�ng equahon (Larson, McKenzie Engineering, Dolan Findings,June 1995): TIF=0.32=100% of the total impact. $20,625 divided by 0.32 equals $64,453. Since the TIF will mitigate for a portion of this impact, it is subtracted from the total ($64,453- $20,625=$43,828). Therefore, the vaIue of the required exacrions should be roughly pzoportionate to this remaining$43,828. Estimated Value of Im�acts Full Irnp act .................................... Less TTF Assessment................................................................................. . 64,453 ..................... -�20 625 Estimated Value of Unmitigated Impacts............................................................... $43,828 FINDING: Using the above cost factors, it can be determined that the urunitigated unpacts exceed the costs of the conditions imposed and, therefore, the conditions are proportionally jusrified. ROW dedication has been recommended, but not requ.ired. M.I.T.C.H. CI�ARTER SCHOOL PAGF,9 OF 96 CUP2006-00002/VAR2006-00069 8/21/06 STAFF REPORT TO THE HEARINGS OFFICER 5ection 18.810.070.A: Side�,_�ks. This section equires that sidew. s be constructed to meet City design standards and be located on both sides of arterial, collector and local residential streets. Private streets and industrial streets shall have sidewalks on at least one side. The sidewalk along 103rd Avenue is 5 feet wide and the sidewalk along Canterbury Lane is a minimum of 6 feet wide, thereby meeting this criterion. Section 18.810.090.A: Sewers. There are no proposed changes to the number of fixture units; therefore no sewer unprovements are required. Section 18.810.100.C: Accommodation of Upstream Drainage. There ate no upstream drainage ways that impact this development. Section 18.810.100.D: Effect on Downstream Drainage. 'This development ap�lication does not propose�any changes to the unpervious surface area; therefore additional detention w�ll not be required. Section 18.810.110.A: Bikeway Extension. Developments adjoining proposed bikeways identified on the City's adopted pedestrian/bikeway plan shall include provis�ons for the future extension of such bikeways through the dedication of easements orng ht-of-way. Canterbury Lane and 103rd Avenue are not identified as bicycle facilities. Section 18.810.120: Utilities. All utili� lines, but not limited to those required for electric, communication, lighting and cable te evision services and related facilities shall be placed underground, exce�t for surface mounted uansformers, surface mounted connection boxes and metet cabinets wluch may be placed above ground, temporary utiliry service facilities during construction, high capaciry electnc lines operat�ng at 50,000 volts or above, and: • The developer shall make all necessary anangements with the serving utility to provide the under�round services; • The City reserves the right to ap�rove location of all surface mounted facilities; • All underground utilit�es, includin�sanitary sewers and storm drains installed in streets by the developer,shall be constructedprior to the surfacu' �of the sueets; and • Stubs for service connections shall be long enough to avoid disturbing the street improvements when service connections are made. Exception to Under-Grounding Requirement: Section 18.810.120.0 states that a developer shall pay a fee in-lieu of under-groun�costs when the development is proposed to take place on a street where existin� utilities whic are not underground will setve the development and the approval authority c�etermines that the cost and technical d.ifficult� of under-grounding the utiLaes outweighs the bene5t of under-grounding in conjunction with the development. The determination shall be on a case-by-case basis. The most common, but not the only, such situation is a short ftontage development for which under-groundin� would result in the placement of additional poles, rather than the removal of above-groun��utilities facilities. An applicant for a develo�ment which is served by utilities wluch are not underground and which are located across a pubhc right-of-way from the applicant's properry shall pay a fee in-lieu of undet- grounding. There are e�sting overhead utiliry lines along the frontage of SW 103rd Avenue. A fee in-lieu of undergrounding was paid as a condition of CUP92-0001. Therefore, this condition has been met. Section 18.360.090.A.2: Relationship to the natural and physical environment: a. Buildings shall be: (1) Located to preserve exist' trees, topography and natural drainage where possible based upon existing site conditions;(2� Located in areas not subject to ground slumping or sliding; (3) Located to provide adequate distance between ad?oining buildings for adequate light, air circulation, and fire-fighting; and (4) Oriented with considerahon for sun and wind. Because the builcli.ng is existing, some of the above requirements do not apply because they apply mainly to new construction. Only the requirements that apply will be addressed. The buildin� is located on the western portion of the site, where the topogxaphy is highest. Two stormwater draulage facilities are M.I.T.C.H.CHART'ER SCHOOL PAGE 10 OF 16 CUP200G-00002/VAR2006-00069 S/21/OG STAFF REPORT TO THE HEARINGS OFFICER • located at the east end of the : , where the topo�raphy is lowest. With ...� ap�ro�mate 3 per cent slope, the building is located in an area that is not sluxnpuig or sliding. The building is adequate for fire-fighting, based on the fact that Tualatin Valley Fire and Rescue has visited the site and has Yecommended no conditions of approval. Therefore, the e�sting building meets the requirements of 18.360.090.A.2 where applicable. b. Trees shall be preserved to the extent possible. Replacement of trees is subject to the requirements of Chapter 18.790,Tree Removal. No trees are being removed. Therefare, this criterion is met. Section 18.360.090.A.4: Buffering, screening and compatibiliry between adjoining uses: a. Buffering shall be provided beriveen different types of land uses, for example, between single- family and multiple-family residential, and residential and commercial uses, and the following factors shall be considered in determining the adequacy of the iype and extent of the buffer: A landscaped buffer already e�sts between the proposed site and the single-family homes to the north. The buffer separates the homes from a driveway, the parking lot and playground. The eastern and northern boundaries of the site are ad�acent to streets; therefore, no buffering is necessary. The western boundary of the site abuts a single-family home and multi-family housing and there is a landscaped strip of mature trees and shrubs along this boundary. Therefore, this cnterion is met. (1) The purpose of the buffer, for example to decrease noise levels, absorb air pollution, filter dust, or to provide a visual bamer; The purpose of the existing buffer is to provide a visual barrier and decrease noise levels from the site. T'his cnterion is met. (2) The size of the buffer required to achieve the purpose in terms of width and height; The buffer matrix xequites level D buffering and screening fox a parking lot abutting sin�le-family detached homes. The e�sting landscaped buffer is 16-20 feet wide and includes mature vegetatron (trees and shrubs) and a 6-foot high fence. Therefore, it meets D2,if not D1, buffering standards, as shown in Table 18.745.2. Single- and multi-fa.mily homes neighbor the western boundary of the site and a wide landscaped strip exists between the homes and the church site. Therefore, this standard is met. (3) The direction(s) from which buffering is needed; (4) The required density of the buffering; and (5) Whether the viewer is stationary or mobile. The existing buffer takes into account the above;therefore, these criteria are met. b. On site screening from view from adjoining properties of such things as service areas, storage areas, parking lots, and mechanical devices on roof tops, i.e., air coolin� and heating systems, shall be provided and the following factors will be considered in determining the adequacy of the type and extent of the screening: The site provides screening of the parking ateas from neighboring homes and public right-of-way. (1) What needs to be screened; (2) The direction from which it is needed; (3) How dense the screen needs to be; (4) Whether the viewer is stationary or mobile; and (5) Whether the screening needs to be year around. and (5)Whether the viewer is stationary or mobile. The e�sting screening takes into account the above;therefore,these criteria are met. 18.360.090.A.9: Demarcation of public, semi-public and private spaces for crime prevention: a. The suuctures and site improvements shall be designed so that public areas such as streets or public gathering places, semi-public areas and private outdoor areas are clearly defined to establish persons having a ri�ht to be in the space, to provide for crime prevent�on and to establish maintenance responsibility; and The e�sting site has been designed to provide for crime prevention, as described in the response to 18.360.090.A.9.b below. b. These areas may be defined by, but not limited to: (1) A deck, patio, low wall, hedge, or draping vine; (2) A trellis or arbor; (3) A change in elevation or grade; (4) A change in the texture of the path matenal; (5) Sign; or (6) Landscaping. M.I.T.C.H.CHARTER SCHOOL PAGE 11 OF 16 CUP2006-00002/VAR2006-00069 8/21/06 STAFF REPORT TO THE HEARINGS OFFICER The e�sting structures on tt�., site are surrounded by asphalt parking . as on three sides. The �erimeter of the site is lined with landscaping, which demarcates the site. The front entrance is clearly visible from the sidewalk and marked by a pathwaY of different texture than the sidewalk. The on-site playground is a private outdoor area that is fenced m, allowing onlp usexs and occupants of the builduig to enteY it. �'herefore, this standard is met. Section 18.3G0.090.A.10: Crime prevention and safety: a. Windows shall be located so that areas vulnerable to crime can be surveyed by the occupants; b. Interior laundry and service areas shall be located in a way that they can be observed by others; c. Mail boxes shall be located in lighted areas havin� vehicular or pedestrian traffic; d. The exterior lighting levels shall be selected and the angles shall be oriented towards areas vulnerable to crime; and e. Light f�tures shall be provided in areas having heavy pedestrian or vehicular traffic and in potentially dangerous areas such as parking lots, stairs, ramps and abrupt grade changes. Fixtures shall be placed at a height so that light patterns overlap at a height of seven feet which is sufficient to illuminate a person. The school will be located on the lower floor of the e�sting building, which has windows that provide a view of the playground, an access driveway and the east parking lot. The lower-floar windows will allow school employees to monitor areas that may be vulnerable to crime (i.e. playground or parking lot). The e�sting lighting in the parking lot and at the building entrance provide sufficient lighting for the school, which operates during the day. 18.360.090.A.11.a: Public Transit. Provisions within the plan shall be included for providing for uansit if the development proposal is adjacent to or within 500 feet of existing or proposed transit route. The site is within 1500 feet of the nearest transit route, which is H�hway 99W. Because the site is not within 500 fee of an existing or proposed tYansit route,no provisions �or public transit are necessary. Section 18.360.090.A.12: Landscaping: a. All landscaping shall be designed in accordance with the requirements set forth in Chapter 18.745; The existing landscaping meets current standards more or less. The site is developed with street trees on both SW Canterbury Lane and SW 103rd Avenue, meeting provision 18.745.040.A. The e�sting east parking lot is developed with approximately 4-foot landscaped islands that include a rnixture of trees and shrubs. The western parking area is separated from the building bp a wide landscaped area of trees and shrubs and is screened from adjacent housing by trees and shrubs. Screening of patking/loading areas meets provision 18.745.050.E more or less. b. In addition to the open space and recreation area requirements of subsections 5 and 6 above, a minimum of 20 percent of the gross area including parking, load.ing and service areas shall be landscaped; and c. A minimum of 15 percent of the gross site area shall be landscaped. FINDING: The existin� Landscaping was last appxoved in CUP2000-00002. There have been no reductions in landscapmg smce 2000 and the applicant does not propose any reduction the e�sting landscaping. 'I'herefore, this condition is met. Section 18.360.090.A.13. Drainage: All drainage plans shall be designed in accordance with the criteria in the adopted 1981 master drainage plan; Per Engineering, the e�sting drainage facilities axe adequate for the proposed use. Section 18.360.090.A.14. Provision for the disabled: All facilities for the disabled shall be designed in accordance with the requirements set forth itt ORS Chapter 447; and All ground-level walkways �3) to building entries are paved with a hard surface and there axe 5 disabled- accessible parking spaces c osest to the entrance of the building and 2 closest to the school. For the purposes of the school, this standard has been met. Section 18.360.090.A.15. All of the provisions and regulations of the underlying zone shall apply unless modified by other sections or this tide, e.g, Planned Developments, Chapter 18.350; or a variance or adjustment granted under Chapter 18.370.; (Ord. 02-33) M.I.T.C.H.CHART'ER SCHOOL PAGE 12 OF 16 CUP2006-00002/VAR2006-00069 8/21/O6 STAFF REPORT TO THE HEARINGS OFFICER ' All provisions and regulations _ che underlying zone have been met, otticr than what has been granted a variance or adjustment. Chapter 18 370 -Variances and Adjustments T'he applicant has requested an adjustment to the bicycle parking requirement found in Table 18.765.2,which spec,ifies b bicycle parking spaces pex classroom for elementary and junior high school. Section 18.370.020.C.7.e: Reduction in rec�uired bicycle parldng. The Director may approve a reduction in required bicycle parldng per Section 18.765.050.E by means of Type II procedure, as governed by Section 18.390.040, if the applicant can demonstrate that the pro�osed use by its nature would be reasonably anticipated to generate a lesser need for bicycle parking. The required number of bicycle parking is 6 spaces per classroom for elementary and junior high schools. The reason for the required bicycle parking provision is not because each classroom will generate a demand for 6 spaces, but that in sum, the total student body of an elementary or junior high school (K-7) will utilize an avetage of 6 spaces �er classroom. However, as described further, the nature of this charter school is that fewer children will nde their bikes to this location. The M.I.T.C.H. Charter School is unlike a neighbothood school because it accepts students from throughout the regional area and not within a specific district. Therefore, it is more likely that students will live further away than what may be a reasonable biking distance for a child. The TSP also does not identify SW 103�Street or SW Canterbury Lane as bicycle faciliries. This combination of factors leads to the conclusion that it is reasonable to reduce the required birycle parking. Because the school will be utilizing a total of 8 classrooms, it is required to provide 48 birycle parking spaces. However, the applicant has requested a reduction to 6 spaces. The proposed site already �rovides a bicycle rack that provides 10 spaces. Staff believes that with 12 teachers, 3 adrnirustrators, and 60 K-7`� �r ade students, a rrLnimum of 6 birycle spaces should be adequate in addition to the existing bicycle rack This should be adequate to accommodate the relative small proportion of bicycle riders. FINDING: It is reasonable to reduce the requited bicycle parking, however, adequate provisions for bicycle parking is still required. • CONDITION: The applicant shall provide a 6-stall bicycle parking structure that is not within parkin�aisles, required landscaping or �edestaan ways. A revlsed plan will be rec�uired showuig the locauon and specific des�gn and location of the required bicycle rack ui accordance with standards in Section 18.765.OSO.A through D of the code. Cha�ter 18 705 -Access,Egress and Circulation Section 18.705.020.A: When provisions apply. The provisions of this chapter shall apply to all development includi.ng the construction of new structures,the remodeling of existing structures (see Section 18.360.050), and to a change of use which increases the on-site parlang or loading requirements or which changes the access requirements. The proposed use does not cause an increase in required on-site parking or loading, as discussed in the Off-street Patking and Loading (Chapter 18.765) section of this report. Therefore, other than what has been addressed in previous sections of this report, access, egress and circulation requirements do not apply. Chapter 18 725 - Environmental Performance Standards The�urpose of this chapter is to apply federal and state environmental laws, rules and regulations be appLed to development within the City of Tigard. Section 18.725.030 regulates: Noise, visible enussions,vibration,odors and insects and rodents. The proposed charter school is not expected to generate visible emissions, vibrations, or odors that would M.I.T.C.H.CHARTER SCHOOL PAGE 13 OF 16 CUP2006-00002/VAR2006-00069 8/21/O6 STAFF REPORT TO THE HEARINGS OFFICER be detectable beyond the pr�r,.rty line. All waste will be stored in clo. containers, and the grounds will be maintained in a manner that would not attract insects and rodents. Noise, typical of a childten's playground, may be a potential issue as a result during the morning and afternoon drop-off and pick-up times and recess duting the day. The existing buffer along the northern boundary will mingate the noise. Between the hours of 7 AM and 9 PM the use shall not generate sound levels in excess of 50 dBA when measured at the property line of the adjacent single-family homes. This standard is applicable at all times. FINDING: The applicant does not address how it will mitigate noise, however, the standard can be met if the applicant satisfies the following condition: CONDITION: The applicant is hereby notified that generating noise in excess of 50 dBA may result in compIunts requiring alteration of acrivities. 'I'he applicant shall cerrify that the proposed use will not generate noise in excess of the standards specified in the Tigard Municipal Code, Chapter 7.40.160. Cha ter 18.745 - Landsca i and Screeni Lan scaping and screening standards have eady been addressed in the Site Development Review (Chapter 18360) section of this report. Cha�ter 18.755 - Mixed Solid Waste and Recyclable Stora�e Section 18.755.O10.B: Applicabilitv. The mixed solid waste and source separated recyclable storage standards shall apply to new multi-unit residential buildings containing five or more units and non-residential construct�on that are subject to full site plan or design review; and are located within urban zones that allow, outright or by condition, for such uses. Although this major modification is subJect to some site develo�ment review standards, the existing site does not fall under the definitions of "new multi-unit residential buildings...and...non-residential construction that are subject to full site plan or design review." Howevex, the apphcant has provided a letter from Pride Disposal (Exhibit 11) indicating that the site is suitable for disposal service. Cha�ter 18.765 - Off-Street Parking and Loadin� Section 18.765.020: Applicabilitv. Change of use. When an exisring structure is changed &om one use to another use as listed in Section 18.765.070, the following provisions shall apply: 1. If the parldng requirements for each use are the same, no additional vehicle parking shall be required; 2. Where a change results in an intensi5cation of use in terms of the number of vehicle parking spaces reqwred, additional vehicle parlan� spaces shall be provided in an amount equal to the Of j`-Street Parking and Loading Requtrements 18.765-2 SE Update: 4/OS difference between the number of spaces required for the existiinng use and the number of spaces required for the more intensive use; 3. Where the change results in a decrease in intensity of use, the applicant may eliminate excess vehicle parlang spaces in an amount equal to the difference between the number of spaces requ.ired for the existing use and the number of spaces required for the less intensive use. The proposed addirion of the school and change of use does not result in any of the above for vehicle patking spaces, as shown in the response to Section 18.765.070 (Minimum and Maximum Off-Street Parking Requirements) below. Therefore, the provisions of this section do not applp, other than bicycle parking standards. Section 18.765.070: Minimum and Maacimum Off-Street Parldng Requirements H. SpeciSc requirements. (See Table 18.765.2) (Ord. 02-13) The off-street parking requirement for a school is 6 spaces per classroom. At 8 proposed classrooms, 16 spaces are reqwred. The site provides 177 s aces and 5 disabled-accessible spaces and 29 spaces in the west side parking area primarilp used for sta�f. In addition, there are SO parking spaces off-site, which mould be available for school use,if necessary. Because regulax church hours do not coincide with regular school hours, the school will have access to more than adequate parking. The proposed use also does not change the access requirements for the site. The proposed use would require one 30-foot access way with 24-foot pavement. The existing site has three access ways of at least 30 feet with 24-foot pavement,which akeady meets access, egress and cuculation requirements. Therefore, the parking standard is already met and no additional spaces are required. M.I.T.C.H.CHART'ER SCHOOL PAGE 14 OF 16 CUP2006-00002/VAR2006-00069 8/21/O6 STAFF REPORT TO THE HEARINGS OFFICER Section 18.765.080.A: Off-street loading spaces. The applicant has not proposed a loading space or indicated that the school will need a loading space. Therefore, this criterion does not apply. Section 18.390.040.E: Minimum bicycle parking requirements. This provision is addressed in the Variances and Adjustments (Chapter 18.370) section of this report. Cha�ter 18.795 -Visual Clearance Areas Section 18.795.020.A: When provisions apply. The provisions of this chapter shall apply to all development including the construction of new structures, the remodeling of existing structures and to a change of use which increases the on-site parking or loading requirements or which changes the access requirements. The change of use does not increase the on-site parking or loading requirements or change access re uirements. Therefore, the provisions of this chapter do not apply, other than what has already been ad�essed Conditional Use (Chapter 18330) section of this report. Cha ter 18.810 - Street And Utili Im rovements Standards Street and utility standards have already een addressed in the Site Development Review (Chapter 18.360) section of this report. SECTION VII. OTHER STAFF COMMENTS The City of Tigard Police Department has reviewed the proposal and has no objections to it. The City of Tigard Engineering Department has reviewed the proposal and has recommended the conditions below, to be sattsfied pnor to a final building inspection. ♦ Addirional right-of-way shall be dedicated to the Public along the frontage of 103rd Avcnuc to increase ther�ght-of-way to 27 feet from the centerline. The descri�tion shall be tied to the existingng ht-of-way centerline. 'I'he dedication document shall be on City forms. Instructions are available from the Engineering Departrnent. • Prior to final building inspection, the applicant shall trun the trees and bushes specified in the Ttaffic Analysis report'in order to unprove sight distance. ♦ Priar to final building inspection, the applicant's engineer shall submit final sight distance certification for the three access points. • The applicant shall either place the e�sting overhead utility lines along SW 103rd Avenue underground as a part of this project, or they shall pay the fee m-lieu of undergrounding. This fee is not required if the applicant, in conjunct�on with the City's Finance Department, can provide evidence of the fee being paid previously. The fee shall be calculated by the fronta�e of the site that is parallel to the utility lines and will be $ 35.00 per lineal foot. If the fee oprion is chosen, the amount will be $ 9590.00 and it shall be paid prior to final building inspection. The Engineering Department also provided the following comment: "The City of Tigard is responsible for assigrung addresses for parcels within the City of Tigard and within the Urban Service Boundary (USB). An addressing fee in the amount of$ 50.00 per address shall be assessed. This fee shall be paid to the City prior to issuance of�ermits. The addressing fee will only be required if the applicant is requesting a new address that is exclusive to the charter school." The Enguieering department made the following recommendation: ♦ Prior to issuance of a building�ernut, the applicant shall pay the addressing fee,if applicable to the charter school. (STAFF CON ACT: Bethany Stewart, Eng�neering�. RESPONSE: Detailed comments are included in the case file and incorporated into the report. The M.I.T.GH.CHART'ER SCHOOL PAGE 15 OF 16 CUP200G-00002/VAR2006-00069 8/21/06 STAFF REPORT TO THE HEARINGS OFFICER ' applicable condirions of appi�val have been included in the staff recon_ _:ndarion. The City of Tigard Building Division has reviewed the proposal and recommended the following condition of approval: ♦ Building permits are required for the change of use. Plans shall indicate all 8 classrooms and their e�sting facilities. RESPONSE: The applicant is required to obtain a building permit for the change of occupancy. The recommended condition of approval has been included in the staff recommendation. SECTION VIII. AGENCY COMMENTS Tualatin Valley Fire and Rescue has reviewed the proposal and offered the following comments: "The fire district has no conditions of approval for this proposal. We do have issues with the property owners doin� buildin� modificarions without the benefit of an appropriate plan review and the issuance of the required pezmtts." RESPONSE: TVF&R's concern has been addressed by the condition of approval recommended by the City of Tigard Building Division. ` � �`� ?�� 6 PRE D BY: DAT'E stant nner �, ��r��-` APPROVED B : Richard H. Bewersdor DATE Plannuig Manager M.I.T.C.H.CHART'ER SCHOOL PAGE 1G OF 1G CUP200G-00002/VAR2006-00069 8/21/O6 STAFF REPORT TO THE HEARINGS OFFICER . . GEOGRAPHICINFORMATION SvSiEM ►,° VIQNI'I'Y MAP �,� - _________= � � cvP2oo6-00002 . � VAR2006-OOOb9 M.I.T.C.H. CHAR'I'ER , � SCHOOL TE �G : \ T FE _' �( . . � ��:`I L� JE � CANTE B ,"_,� `, Q'.� � �RA __ ., �„ BEfF��' � W � Tqw nna b�.P � N � m � 0 100 200 300 400 Feef MURDOCK ST i"=311 leet ��1 � � B� � . � e . � InlormaGon on this map is for yeneral locatbn only end � 8 , . . . should ba verlfisd wiN the Development Services Division. � � 13125 SW Hall BNd � Tfysrd,OR 97223 � Q� DELMONTE DR hav:ii��i:�m�a.�g Community Development Plot date:Jul 27,2006;C:lmagiclMAGIC03.APR :� . _ � ,, � ( ' s�.• .,..,,.v.,,,: ! ___._ . _.._... .._ _ _. . . . ....... _ ._.. _ _ ...___. .. _ __ _ I ' �� ..n. ].QaO.� � ' ;f.on . ~ .._.tf�o - -- . . _ . e� _... . �� ..._ .. _ . ... lsaa... .. . . _._ _.._ � � ��r ��_��.�.�T�� ...t�P ��T� •(�� . . �. , ' . . ' . __� _ `——______— '.�i1MwYa� � '�� , � , , '�ry' ...- .. . � : , � - .aau�sr.. q�..loa�4w� . � � ama:�#:os�w �wmu� --^---- e.�iar..� �rn Hiur � Jneis�f.�_ ,� . � ' . .c�b-9�Wlei1��.�. 4+�+o uew� rhK�r � -� • �� . .WRQ h��T�, h+. h�+�.� .RR�Lw��. /p \ Gr . .I i :I'��. ' . , . . y . - _ �/ � �} ° . � � I .. � tl � -- �'�c�.s�� y,,F - __ 'C • . . `� , I - �� -��,+'-r-�'-� �.b'�'�`�� L' I I� 1t-wr'�._.� t F F � wirm,ti- � I I,'�i.� i,!I °- f� � � ��: �.��s.:, �' �� IIII�Ilil l�Il j aaxa�W �. {- T �4� ��.-_ � I I��IIi,IIII ��'� '� �,�,� � �� m°`a'�- i A. e- ' � � �� I � � �./ -�. .��.� � -�wr� � � µ�ar�a'6 � � i r . ' III',II�I ,III�I I� K��a M /--�bR - _'f?' �.�} -l'5..� - I � �II�II��IIII� , P.i � �� E ',� :a.{Y`Sa�. . .M tul.'-.-_. n ; i / � ' � ^'� . I i I.I III II II'�IIIII I II�I . � �!� � .,:s - _ ' V w�rwG.•R►im � : ,� I ii� � II� r �i ...c _ r.o w� ; i i �I i _ �I I�i�' _ :� � �',i�Rte,ar� , n�.� �,Mwv++�v..� . � � �2�e°� I -_ .Yanrn�.T^,�� ✓ 1� I.. . ' �� : ; � � .�e�r,.ro = � � r � C' y ` � � �-� i'a� `- �� . � �� RE QUE ST FOR COMMENTS ° DATE: Ju1�28,2006 TO: Brian Blalock,Commercial Plans Examiner FROM: City of Tigard Plaruuug Division STAFF CONTACT: Emil�Eng,Assistant Planner(x2712� Phone: (503) 639-4171 F�: (503) 684-7297 Email: Emily�rigard-or.�ov CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT (CUP) 2006-00002/ADJUSTMENT (VAR) 2006-00069 ➢ M.I.T.C.H. CHARTER SCHOOL Q REQUEST: The applicant is requesting Conditional Use Permit to allow the M.I.T.C.I� Charter School to occupy classroom space in the Calvin Presbyterian Church. M.I.T.C.H. is K-8 and has approximately 198 students. The school will lease the lower level of the church, which has 8 classrooms and a commons area. The school will also have access to a fenced playground on site. The applicant does not propose any changes to the church exterior or site. In addition, the applicant rec�uests an adjustment to the bicycle parking standard of 6 spaces per classroom. The applicant desires to reduce the reqwred number of bicycle pa�rking spaces from 48 to 6. LOCATION: 10445 SW Canterbury Lane; Washington County Tax Map 2S 111BC, Tax Lot 2800. ZONE: R 3.5: Low Densitv Residential District. The R 3.5 zoning d�stnct is designed to accommodate detached single-family homes with or without accessory residential units at a m,n,mum lot size of 10,000 square feet. Duplexes are pernlitted conditionally. Some civic and institutional uses are also perinitted conditionally. APPLICABLE REVIEW CRITERIA: Community Development Code Chapters: 18.330, 18.360, 18.390, 18.510, 18.705, 18.725, 18.745, 18.755, 18.765, 18.780, 18.790, 18.795,and 18.810. Attached are the Site Plan, Vicinity Map andAp plicant's Statement/Plans for your review. From inforn�ation supplied byvarious departments and agencies and from other uzforn�ation available to our staff, a report and recommendation will be prepared and a decision will be rendered on the proposal in the near future. If you wish to comment on this application, WE NEED YOUR COMMENTS BACK BY: AUGUST 11 2006. You may use the space provided below or attach a separate letter to return your comments. I u are una e to res ond b the above date, please phone the staff contact noted above withyour comments and co u-myo u�r� comments in wxYtm as soon as possible. If you have any questions, contact the Tigard Planning Division, 13125 SW Hall Boulevard,Tigard,� 97223. PLEASE CHECK THE FOLLOWING ITEMS THAT APPLY: _ We have reviewed the proposal and have no objections to it. Please contact of our office. Please refer to the enc ose etter. � Written comments provided below: U U �L� �lU� C" ��/ / ;` f} �� `� t-� ia�'-�•'�L�% �� f°�� C f�fl/u G� D!� c'.J.s� . �L f��-`s >�f�,�� iN f�� c A r:�� ,��1 � L '� G �� c' ��s.",� f�1�..F J� r '/�_.� �/' �- � a=- ' " a.'. � I Name&Number of Person(s) Commenting: �� N f1 �L�� •- , � �`J , � I � . / � _�U�\��/ � - I _—j I � - . � I GEOGRAPHIC INFORMATinN $VSTEM '�� Q�� __________ GUP2006-00002 � VAR2006-00069 � __________ - � M.I.T.C.H. C�IARTE R � ' � SC�IOOL m TE �� G� �5 FER -- —_ \ � T FE� ,�„ � -- � < � '� _ _ 'I 1 �w _ E � �,. � � J � CANTERBU � �� '�BULL AiTRO.� —�`�Q��BONITA 6EfFBEN�RO�'. WRHqA�.�IR� � � Tipard Area Map / / � • � N � m � MURDOCK ST � '—��°°— '°° Fee` I - 1"=371 feet B �M � � � . � ' ° e � � 8 Information on this map is for general bcation only and � � sMuld be verifed with ihe�avalopment Services Division. 13125 SW Hall Blvd �7 � Tigard,OR 97223 I DELMONTET�� I (50J)639-4171 m nnP:inM.w.d.i�9a.a.a.�s Community Development Plot date:Jul 27,2006;C:lmagiclMAGIC03.APR �� RE QUE ST FOR COMME NTS ° DATE: Jul,v 2g,2006 TO: Jim Wolf,Tiga�Police Department Crime Prevention Officer FROM: City of Tigard Planning Division STAFF CONTACT: Emil�Eng,Assistant Planner(x2712) Phone: (503) 639-4171 FaY: (503) 684-7297 Email: Emil�tiQ` ard-or.gov CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT (CUP) 2006-00002/ADJUSTMENT (VAR) 2006-00069 ➢ M.I.T.C.H. CHARTER SCHOOL Q REQUEST: The applicant is requesting Conditional Use Pernlit to allow the M.I.T.GH Charter School to occupy classroom space in the Calvin Presbyterian Ckiurch. M.I.T.G�L is K-8 and has appro�i�ately 198 students. The school will lease the lower level of the church, which has 8 classrooms and a commons area. The school will also have access to a fenced playground on site. The applicant does not propose any changes to the church exterior or site. In addition, the applicant rec�uests an adjustment to the bicycle parking standard of 6 spaces per classroom. The applicant desires to reduce the reqiured number of bicycle parking spaces from 48 to 6. LOCATION: 10445 SW Canterbury Lane; Washington County T�Map 2S 111BC, Tax Lot 2800. ZONE: R 3.5: Low Density Residential District. The R 3.5 zonin� district is des' ned to accommodate detached single-fartuly homes with or without accessory residential units at a muuinum lot size o� 10,000 square feet. Duplexes are perniitted conditionally. Some civic and insntuuonal uses are also pernutted conditionally. APPLICABLE REVIEW CRITERIA: Community Development Code Chapters: 18.330, 18.360, 18.390, 18.510, 18.705, 18.725, 18.745, 18.755, 18.765, 18.780, 18.790, 18.795,and 18.810. Attached are the Site Plan, Vcinity Map andAp plicant's Statement/Plans for your review. From inforniation supplied byvarious departments and agencies and from other uiforn�ation available to our staff,a report and recommendation will be prepared and a decision will be rendered on the proposal in the near future. If you wish to comment on this application, WE NEED YOUR COMMENTS BACK BY: AUGUST 11 2006. You may use the space provided below or attach a separate etter to return your comments. I u are una e to res ond b the above date, please phone the staff contact noted above withyc?ur comments and co irmy�u�r� comments in wnting as soon as possible. If you have any questions, contact the Tigard Planning Division, 13125 SW Hall Boulevard,T'igard,OR 97223. PLEASE CHECK THE FOLLOWING ITEMS THAT APPLY: ✓ We have reviewed the proposal and have no objections to it. Please contact of our office. Please refer to the enc ose etter. _ Written comments provided below: IName&Ntunber of Pecson(s)Commenting: �,�6� �Z�' I .. �, �� REQUEST FOR C�MMENTS ° � � � . DATE: Iu1�-28,2006 TO: PER ATTACHED FROM: Cit��of Tigard Planning Division STAFF CONTr�CT: Emil�Eng,Assistant Planner (x2712� Phone: (503) 639-4171 Fax: (503) 684-7297 Email: Emily�a�riQard-or.gov CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT (CUP) 2006-00002/ADJUSTMENT (VAR) 2006-000G9 ➢ M.I.T.C.H. CHARTER SCHOOL Q REQUEST: The applicant is requesting Condirional L'se Pernut to allow the :�1.L"1�.(:.H. Charter School to occup�� classroom space in the Cal��in Presbyterian Church. M.I.T.C.H. is K-8 and has appro�imatele 198 students. The school will lease the lower level of the church, which has 8 classrooms and a commons area. The school will also have access to a fenced playground on site. The applicant does not propose any changes to the church exterior or site. In addition, the applicant requests an adjustment to the bicycle parking standard of 6 spaces per classroom. The applicant desires to reduce the required number of bic��cle parking spaces from 48 to 6. LOCATION: 10445 SW Canterbury Lane; Washington Counry Tax �fap 2S111BC, Tax Lot 2800. ZONE: R-3.5: Low-Densit�% Residenrial District. The R-3.5 zoning district is designed to accommodate detached single-family homes with or without accessory residential units at a miiumum lot size of 10,000 square feet. Duplexes are permitted conditionally. Some civic and institutional uses are also pexrnitted condirionally. APPLICABLE REVIEW CRITERIA: Community Development Code Chapters: 18.330, 18.360, 18.390, 18.510, 18.705, 18.725, 18.745, 18.755, 18.765, 18.780, 18.790, 18.795,and 18.810. Attached are the Site Plan,Vicinity Map and Applicant's Statement/Plans for your review. From information supplied b�- �-arious departments and agencies and from other mformation a��ailable to our staff, a report and recommendarion will be prepared and a decision tvill be rendered on the proposal in the near future. If you wish to comment on this applicarion, WE NEED YOUR COMMENTS BACK BY: AUGUST 11, 2006. You may use the space provided below or attach a separate letter to return �-our comments. If��ou are unable to res�ond b� the above date, please phone the staff contact noted above with your comments and confirm your comments in writing as soon as possible. If you have any questions, contact the Tigard Planning Division, 13125 SW Hall Boulevard,Tigard,OR 97223. PLEASE CHECK THE FOLLOWING ITEMS THAT APPLY: _ We have reviewed the proposal and have no objecrions to it. _ Please contact of our office. _ Please refer to the enclosed letter. _ Written comments provided below: IName&Number of Person(s)Commenting: I � CITY OF TIGARD REQUEST F ' COMMENTS NOTIFIa,hfION LIST FOR LAND USE & COMMUNITY ��ELOPMENT APPLICATIONS �� FILE NOS.: C `�� ' �--� � � �--��'� , �j FILE NAME: `'� 1�L-t C�C• ' � . �L��:_ � CITItEN INVOLVEMENT TEAMS 14-DAY PENDING APPLICATION NOTICE TO INTERESTED PARTIES OF AREA: ❑Central ❑East �South ❑West CITY OffICES LONG RANGE PLANNING/Barbara Shields,Planning Mgr. COMMUNITY DVLPMNT.DEPT./Planning-Engineering Techs. �y POLICE DEPT.1Jim Wolf,Crime Prevention Officer 6 BUILDING DIVISION/Mark(residential)Brian(commercial) x ENGINEERING DEPT./Kim McMillan,Dvlpmnt.Review Engineer PUBLIC WORKS/Matt Stine,Urban Forester CITY ADMINISTRATION/Cathy Wheatley,City Recorder PUBLIC WORKS/Rob Murchison,Project Engineer PLANNING COMMISSION(+��sets) ✓PLANNER—POST PROJECT SITE 10 BUSINESS DAYS PRIOR TO A PUBLIC HEARINGI _HEARINGS OFFICER(+2 sets) SPECIAL DISTRICTS � TUAL.HILLS PARK&REC.DIST.r�TUALATIN VALLEY FIRE&RESCUE r _ TUALATIN VALLEY WATER DISTRICT� � CLEANWATER SERVICES+1 Planning Manager North Division Administrative Office Lee Walker/SWM Proqram 15707 SW Walker Road John K.Dalby,Deputy Fire Marshall PO Box 745 155 N.First Avenue Beaverton,OR 97006 14480 SW Jenkins Road Beaverton,OR 97075 Hilisboro,OR 97124 Beaverton,OR 97005-1152 LOCAL AND STATE IURISDICTIONS CITY OF BEAVERTON� CITY OF TUALATIN �IF OR.DEPT.OF FISH&WILDLIFE OR.DIV.OF STATE LANDS Planning Manager Planning Manager Devin Simmons,Habitat Biologist Melinda Wood�uN F«m n.q��r.a� Steven Sparks,Dev Svcs.Manager 18880 SW Martinazzi Avenue North Willamette Watershed District 775 Summer Street NE,Suite 100 PO Box 4755 Tualatin,OR 97062 18330 NW Sauvie Island Road Salem,OR 97301-1279 Beaverton,OR 97076 Portland,OR 97231 _ OR.PUB.UTILITIES COMM. METRO-LAND USE&PLANNING � _OR.DEPT.OF GEO.8 MINERAL IND. 550 Capitol Street NE _ CITY OF DURHAM� 600 NE Grand Avenue 800 NE Oregon Street,Suite 5 Salem,OR 97310-1380 City Manager Portland.OR 97232-2736 Portland,OR 97232 17160 SW Upper Boones Fry.Rd. _ Bob Knight,oacaR�,.�c�,�xczcn� U5 ARMY CORPS.OF ENG. Durham,OR 97224 Paulette Allen,GrowNManagamentCoortlinata OR.DEPT.OF LAND CONSERV.&DVLP. Kathryn Harris iM,P.acws�.n..o��Y� _ Mel Huie,GreenspaceeCoorGinata(CPA20A) L2fIy Ff@�Ch�Canp P�annmendmentsOn�y) Routing CENWP-OP-G CITY OF KING CITY� _ Jennifer Budhabhatti,Regional Planner(WetlanES) 635 Capitol 5treet NE,Suite 150 PO Box 2946 City Manager _ C.D.Manager,GrwrthManapementServices Salem,OR 97301-2540 Portland,OR 97208-2946 15300 5W 116th Avenue King City,OR 97224 WASHINGTON COUNTY� _ OR.DEPT.OF ENERGY�POwer�ines in nreaJ _OR.DEPT OF AVIATION�MOnopo�s Towenl Dept.of Land Use&Transp. Bonneville Power Administration Tom Highland,Plannirg 155 N.First Avenue _CITY OF LAKE OSWEGO� Routing TTRC—Attn: Renae Ferrera 3040 25th Street,SE Suite 350,MS 13 Planning Director PO Box 3621 Salem,OR 97310 Hillsboro.OR 97124 PO Box 369 Portland,OR 97208-3621 Steve Conwaycce��e�,aPPS.� Lake Oswego,OR 97034 Gregg Leion�cPn� _ OR.DEPT.OF ENVIRON.QUALITY(DEQ) ODOT,REGION 1 iR Brent Curtis icPa� CITY OF PORTLAND (NOtifyfaWetlandsanCPOlentialEnvironmentallmpact5) Grant Robinson,DevelopmenlReviewCoordinalw Doria Mateja�zcA�n,s+a Planning Bureau Director Regional Administrator _Carl Torland, Right-of-Way Section�ve�cKK,S� _Sr.Cartographer�cP�vzca.,n,s,. 1900 SW 4'"Avenue,Suite 4100 2020 5W Fourth Avenue,Suite 400 123 NW Flanders _Jim Nims,s�Ne,�,z�,MS,S Portland,OR 97201 Portland,�R 97201-4987 Portland,OR 97209-4037 WACO.CONSOL.COMM.AGNCY ODOT,REGION 1 -DISTRICT 2A� _ODOT,RAIL DIVISION STATE HISTORIC � Dave Austin�wcccn��s„••,M�.T�..,.� Sam Hunaidi,Assistant DisVict Manaper (NOtify if ODOT R1R-Hwy.Crosslrp in Only Ace�ss M LaeA) PRESERVATION OFFICE PO Box 6375 6000 SW Raab Road Dave Lanning,s�.a�s�,�saroy s�rs� (Notl}y il Propsrty Has I/D OveAay) Beaverton,OR 97007-0375 PoRland,OR 97221 555-13'"Street,NE,Suite 3 1115 Commercial Street,NE Salem,OR 97301-4179 Salem,OR 97301-1012 UTILITY PROVIDERS AND SPECIAL AGENCIES PORTLAND WESTERN R/R,BURLINGTON NORTHERN/SANTA FE R/R,OREGON ELECTRIC R/R(Bur�ington NorthemlSanta Fe R/R Predecessor) Bruce Carsweil,President 8 General Manager 1200 Howard Drive SE Albany,OR 97322-3336 SOUTHERN PACIFIC TRANS.CO.R/R METRO AREA COMMUNICATIONS COMCAST CABLE CORP. TRI-MET TRANSIT DVLPMT. Clifford C.Cabe,Construction Engineer Debra Palmer�a,�».a��,sa,y� Gerald Backhaus,.s«,��,A,«a��rn QfPrqec�iSWithinY.M�ieo(aTransitROUte) 5424 SE McLoughlin Boulevard Twin Oaks Technology Center 14200 SW Brigadoon Court Ben Baldwin,Project Planner Portland,OR 97232 1815 NW 169th Place,S-6020 Beaverton,OR 97005 710 NE Holladay Street Beaverton,OR 97006-4886 Portland,OR 97232 �PORTLAND GENERAL ELECTRIC g NW NATURAL GAS COMPANY VERIZON QWEST COMMUNICATIONS Ken Gutierrez,Svc.Design Consultant Scott Palmer,Engineering Coord. David Bryant,Engineering Ly�n Smith,Eng.ROW Mgr. 9480 SW Boeckman Road 220 NW Second Avenue OR 030533/PO Box 1100 8021 SW Capitol Hill Rd,Rm 110 Wilsonville,OR 97070 Portland,OR 97209-3991 Beaverton,OR 97075-1100 PoRland,OR 97219 TIGARDITUALATIN SCHOOL DIST.#23J BEAVERTON SCHOOL DIST.#48 COMCAST CABLE CORP. COMCAST CABLE COMMUNIC. Teri Brady,Administrative Offices Jan Youngquist,�emographics Alex Silantiev ,s.e�,w.�ca,v��, Diana Carpenter,4,�ea��a�, 6960 SW Sandburg Street 16550 SW Merlo Road 9605 SW Nimbus Avenue,Bldg.12 10831 SW Cascade Avenue Tigard,OR 97223-8039 Beaverton,OR 97006-5152 Beaverton,OR 97008 Tigard,OR 97223-4203 � INDICATES AUTOMATIC NOTIFICATION IN COMPLIANCE WITH INTERGOVERNMENTAL AGREEMENT IF WITHIN 500'OF THE SUBJECT PROPERTY FOR ANYIALL CITY PROJECTS(Project Planner Is Responsible For Indicating Parties To Notify�. h:\pattylmasterslRequest For Comments Notification List.doc (UPDATED: 23-May-O6) � . MEMORANDUM CITY OF TIGARD, OREGON DATE: 8/7/06 TO: Emily Eng, Assistant Planner FROM: Kim McMillan, Development Review Engineer RE: CUP2006-00002 M.I.T.C.H. Charter School Access Manaqement (Section 18.705.030.H) Section 18.705.030.H.1 states that an access report shall be submitted with all new development proposals which verifies design of driveways and streets are safe by meeting adequate stacking needs, sight distance and deceleration standards as set by ODOT, Washington County, the City and AASHTO. CTS Engineers submitted a Traffic Analysis report, dated August 2, 2006, for this project. The report addresses sight distance for the three access points on site. Canterbury Lane was assumed to have a designated speed limit of 25 mph, which requires 250 feet of sight distance. The engineer states that 103�d Avenue is posted 35 mph, requiring 350 feet of sight distance. Staff found that 103`d Avenue has a posted speed limit of 25 mph. This is posted just south of the intersection with McDonald Street. Also, the City's Speed Control Board Orders do not indicate a 35 mph posting on 103`d Avenue. The report states that the westernmost driveway on Canterbury Lane has sight distance to the east that exceeds 250 feet. By trimming a bush on the site the sight distance can be increased to almost 500 feet, providing a clear view to the intersection at Murdock. The sight distance to the west is limited to 190 feet by a bush at the base of a tree along the side of Canterbury Lane. The engineer states that the sight distance will be adequate if this bush is trimmed. The report also states the main driveway on Canterbury Lane has clear sight distance to the intersection with 103�d Avenue, approximately 190 feet. This is a tee intersection where Canterbury Lane terminates. Sight distance to the west exceeds 250 feet, measured 10 feet back from the edge of curb. Further, the report indicates the driveway located on 103`d Avenue has a sight distance to the north that exceeds 360 feet. Sight distance to the south is limited to 275 feet to the intersection with Canterbury Lane. However, sight distance of 350 feet can be provided by trimming the lower branches of the second and third street trees south of the driveway. ENGINEERING COMMENTS CUP2006-00002 M.I.T.C.H. Charter School PAGE 1 The applicant shall trim the bushes and trees as outlined by the traffic engineer's report and restated in the above narrative. Prior to final building inspection, the applicant's engineer shall submit final sight distance certification for these three access points. Section 18.105.030.H.2 states that driveways shall not be permitted to be placed in the influence area of collector or arterial street intersections. Influence area of intersections is that area where queues of traffic commonly form on approach to an intersection. The minimum driveway setback from a collector or arterial street intersection shall be150 feet, measured from the right-of-way line of the intersecting street to the throat of the proposed driveway. The setback may be greater depending upon the influence area, as determined from City Engineer review of a traffic impact report submitted by the applicant's traffic engineer. In a case where a project has less than 150 feet of street frontage, the applicant must explore any option for shared access with the adjacent parcel. If shared access is not possible or practical, the driveway shall be placed as far from the intersection as possible. Canterbury Lane and 103�d Avenue are classified as local streets; therefore this standard does not apply. Section 18.705.030.H.3 and 4 states that the minimum spacing of driveways and streets along a collector shall be 200 feet. The minimum spacing of driveways and streets along an arterial shall be 600 feet. The minimum spacing of local streets along a local street shall be 125 feet. This application does not propose to construct a local street along Canterbury Lane or 103`d Avenue, both local streets. This criterion is met. Street And Utility Improvements Standards (Section 18.8101: Chapter 18.810 provides construction standards for the implementation of public and private facilities and utilities such as streets, sewers, and drainage. The applicable standards are addressed below: Streets: Improvements: Section 18.810.030.A.1 states that streets within a development and streets adjacent shall be improved in accordance with the TDC standards. Section 18.810.030.A.2 states that any new street or additional street width planned as a portion of an existing street shall be dedicated and improved in accordance with the TDC. ENGINEERING COMMENTS CUP2006-00002 M.I.T.C.H. Charter School PAGE 2 Minimum Rights-of-Way and Street Widths: Section 18.810.030.E requires a local street to have a 54 right-of-way width and 32-foot paved section. Other improvements required may include on-street parking, sidewalks and bikeways, underground utilities, street lighting, storm drainage, and street trees. This site lies adjacent to SW 103`d Avenue, which is classified as a local street on the City of Tigard Transportation Plan Map. At present, there is approximately 25 feet of ROW from centerline, according to the most recent tax assessor's map. The applicant should dedicate the additional ROW to provide 27 feet from centerline in accordance with the City's adopted TSP. ' R4„+� +h..� �h� r�rl�A� IC FiI� fPPt ^n t •, � .,a.... :• �n foof �., ..;�++ . The applicant also states that the improvements are constructed with sufficient ROW under a previous land use decision. However, the standards have changed and a Conditional Use application must meet the current standards. Therefore, the applicant shall provide ROW dedication for a total of 27 feet from centerline. 3 3 � 3� SW 103�d Avenue is currently improved. The applicant states there is 4.�feet of pavement width, exceeding the 32 feet required. . t . There is an existing 2.5 foot wide planter strip and a 5 foot wide sidewalk. This does not meet the standard, but as a continuation of existing conditions the sidewalk and planter will be accepted as is with this application. The site also lies adjacent to Canterbury Lane, which is classified as a local street on the City of Tigard Transportation Plan Map. . At present, there is approximately 55 feet of ROW, 30 feet of ROW no�th of centerline. No additional ROW is required. o� SW Canterbury Lane is currently improved. -�I'n-� Pav�►ne�' . width 'c�32 feet from curb to curb. There is a wider section where a pull-out occurs. There is a 10 foot wide planter strip and a minimum 6 foot wide sidewalk that is partially in the ROW and partially within an easement. No additional improvements are �equired. Future Street Plan and Extension of Streets: Section 18.810.030.F states that a future street plan shall be filed which shows the pattern of existing and proposed future streets from the boundaries of the proposed land division. This section also states that where it is necessary to give access or permit a satisfactory future division of adjoining land, streets shall be extended to the boundary lines of the tract to be developed and a barricade shall be constructed at the end of the street. These street stubs to adjoining ENGINEERING COMMENTS CUP2006-00002 M.I.T.C.H. Charter School PAGE 3 properties are not considered to be cul-de-sacs since they are intended to continue as through streets at such time as the adjoining property is developed. A barricade shall be constructed at the end of the street by the property owners which shall not be removed until authorized by the City Engineer, the cost of which shall be included in the street construction cost. Temporary hammerhead turnouts or temporary cul-de-sac bulbs shall be constructed for stub streets in excess of 150 feet in length. This development is located at the corner of 103`d Avenue and Canterbury Lane. There are no opportunities for future streets or extensions of existing streets. Street Alignment and Connections: Section 18.810.030.H.1 states that full street connections with spacing of no more than 530 feet between connections is required except where prevented by barriers such as topography, railroads, freeways, pre-existing developments, lease provisions, easements, covenants or other restrictions existing prior to May 1, 1995 which preclude street connections. A full street connection may also be exempted due to a regulated water feature if regulations would not permit construction. Section 18.810.030.H.2 states that all local, neighborhood routes and collector streets which abut a development site shall be extended within the site to provide through circulation when not precluded by environmental or topographical constraints, existing development patterns or strict adherence to other standards in this code. A street connection or extension is precluded when it is not possible to redesign, or reconfigure the street pattern to provide required extensions. Land is considered topographically constrained if the slope is greater than 15% for a distance of 250 feet or more. In the case of environmental or topographical constraints, the mere presence of a constraint is not sufficient to show that a street connection is not possible. The applicant must show why the constraint precludes some reasonable street connection. This development is located at the corner of 103�d Avenue and Canterbury Lane. There are no opportunities for future streets or extensions of existing streets. Block Designs - Section 18.810.040.A states that the length, width and shape of blocks shall be designed with due regard to providing adequate building sites for the use contemplated, consideration of needs for convenient access, circulation, control and safety of street traffic and recognition of limitations and opportunities of topography. Block Sizes: Section 18.810.040.B.1 states that the perimeter of blocks formed by streets shall not exceed 1,800 feet measured along the right-of- way line except: ENGINEERING COMMENTS CUP2006-00002 M.I.T.C.H. Charter School PAGE 4 • Where street location is precluded by natural topography, wetlands or other bodies of water or, pre-existing development or; • For blocks adjacent to arterial streets, limited access highways, major collectors or railroads. • For non-residential blocks in which internal public circulation provides equivalent access. PLANNING Section 18.810.040.B.2 also states that bicycle and pedestrian connections on public easements or right-of-ways shall be provided when full street connection is not possible. Spacing between connections shall be no more than 330 feet, except where precluded by environmental or topographical constraints, existing development patterns, or strict adherence to other standards in the code. PLANNING Lots -Size and Shape: Section 18.810.060(A) prohibits lot depth from being more than 2.5 times the average lot width, unless the parcel is less than 1.5 times the minimum lot size of the applicable zoning district. PLANNING Lot Frontage: Section 18.810.060(B) requires that lots have at least 25 feet of frontage on public or private streets, other than an alley. In the case of a land partition, 18.420.050.A.4.c applies, which requires a parcel to either have a minimum 15-foot frontage or a minimum 15-foot wide recorded access easement. In cases where the lot is for an attached single-family dwelling unit, the frontage shall be at least 15 feet. PLANNING Sidewalks: Section 18.810.070.A requires that sidewalks be constructed to meet City design standards and be located on both sides of arterial, collector and local residential streets. Private streets and industrial streets shall have sidewalks on at least one side. tes nsio . . The sidewalk along 103�d Avenue is 5 feet wide and the sidewalk along Canterbury Lane is a minimum of 6 feet wide� -1-(n(�r�j� ��,�� .�-�� {.�r�o� . ENGINEERING COMMENTS CUP2006-00002 M.I.T.C.H. Charter School PAC3E 5 Sanitary Sewers: Sewers Required: Section 18.810.090.A requires that sanitary sewer be installed to serve each new development and to connect developments to existing mains in accordance with the provisions set forth in Design and Construction Standards for Sanitary and Surface Water Management (as adopted by Clean Water Services in 1996 and including any future revisions or amendments) and the adopted policies of the comprehensive plan. Over-sizing: Section 18.810.090.0 states that proposed sewer systems shall include consideration of additional development within the area as projected by the Comprehensive Plan. There are no proposed changes to the number of fixture units; therefore no sewer improvements are required. Storm Drainage: General Provisions: Section 18.810.100.A requires developers to make adequate provisions for storm water and flood water runoff. Accommodation of Upstream Drainage: Section 18.810.100.0 states that a culvert or other drainage facility shall be large enough to accommodate potential runoff from its entire upstream drainage area, whether inside or outside the development. The City Engineer shall approve the necessary size of the facility, based on the provisions of Design and Construction Standards for Sanitary and Surface Water Management (as adopted by Clean Water Services in 2000 and including any future revisions or amendments). There are no upstream drainage ways that impact this development. Effect on Downstream Drainage: Section 18.810.100.D states that where it is anticipated by the City Engineer that the additional runoff resulting from the development will overload an existing drainage facility, the Director and Engineer shall withhold approval of the development until provisions have been made for improvement of the potential condition or until provisions have been made for storage of additional runoff caused by the development in accordance with the Design and Construction Standards for Sanitary and Surface Water Management (as adopted by Clean Water Services in 2000 and including any future revisions or amendments). In 1997, Clean Water Services (CWS) completed a basin study of Fanno Creek and adopted the Fanno Creek Watershed Management Plan. Section V of that ENGINEERING COMMENTS CUP2006-00002 M.I.T.C.H. Charter School PAGE 6 plan includes a recommendation that local governments institute a stormwater detention/effective impervious area reduction program resulting in no net increase in storm peak flows up to the 25-year event. The City will require that all new developments resulting in an increase of impervious surfaces provide onsite detention facilities, unless the development is located adjacent to Fanno Creek. For those developments adjacent to Fanno Creek, the storm water runoff will be permitted to discharge without detention. This development application does not propose any changes to the impervious surface area; therefore additional detention will not be required. Bikeways and Pedestrian Pathways: Bikeway Extension: Section 18.810.110.A states that developments adjoining proposed bikeways identified on the City's adopted pedestrian/bikeway plan shall include provisions for the future extension of such bikeways through the dedication of easements or right-of-way. Canterbury Lane and 103�d Avenue are not identified as bicycle facilities. Utilities: Section 18.810.120 states that all utility lines, but not limited to those required for electric, communication, lighting and cable television services and related facilities shall be placed underground, except for surface mounted transformers, surface mounted connection boxes and meter cabinets which may be placed above ground, temporary utility service facilities during construction, high capacity electric lines operating at 50,000 volts or above, and: • The developer shall make all necessary arrangements with the serving utility to provide the underground services; • The City reserves the right to approve location of all surface mounted facilities; • All underground utilities, including sanitary sewers and storm drains installed in streets by the developer, shall be constructed prior to the surfacing of the streets; and • Stubs for service connections shall be long enough to avoid disturbing the street improvements when service connections are made. Exception to Under-Grounding Requirement: Section 18.810.120.0 states that a developer shall pay a fee in-lieu of under-grounding costs when the development is proposed to take place on a street where existing utilities which are not underground will serve the development and the approval authority determines that the cost and technical difficulty of under- grounding the utilities outweighs the benefit of under-grounding in ENGINEERING COMMENTS CUP2006-00002 M.I.T.C.H. Charter School PAGE 7 conjunction with the development. The determination shall be on a case- by-case basis. The most common, but not the only, such situation is a short frontage development for which under-grounding would result in the placement of additional poles, rather than the removal of above-ground utilities facilities. An applicant for a development which is served by utilities which are not underground and which are located across a public right-of-way from the applicant's property shall pay a fee in-lieu of under- grounding. There are existing overhead utility lines along the frontage of SW 103`d Avenue. The applicant states that a fee in-lieu of undergrounding was paid as a condition of CUP92-0001. Staff has been unable to substantiate that claim. If the applicant or the City's Finance Department can provide the proof that the fee was paid no further fee is required. Otherwise, the fee in-lieu is required and is equal to $ 35.00 per lineal foot of street frontage that contains the overhead lines. The frontage along this site is 274 lineal feet; therefore the fee would be $ 9590.00. ADDITIONAL CITY AND/OR AGENCY CONCERNS WITH STREET AND UTILITY IMPROVEMENT STANDARDS: Traffic Study Findinqs: CTS Engineers submitted a Traffic Analysis report, dated August 2, 2006, for this development. The school is expected to generate approximately 174 vehicle trips during the AM peak hour and 129 trips during the mid-afternoon peak hour of the school. Based on the school's daily operating and event schedules, a negligible number of PM peak hour trips are expected. The traffic engineer concluded, based on the results of the full analysis described in the report, that the proposed charter school can be operated at the church site without adversely affecting traffic operations or safety near the site. Furthermore, key intersections and roadways in the study area will continue to operate at acceptable Levels of Service with the school's maximum enrollment of 198 students. The internal circulation system serves the site well, with driveways set far enough back from the adjacent intersections to avoid potential traffic conflicts. The engineer goes on to state that the City should consider, regardless of this application, trimming or having the property owner trim a few bushes in the landscaping that affect sight distance from the finro main driveways. The trimming of bushes and trees has been required of the applicant, in a previous section of this report, as a condition of approval. ENGINEERING COMMENTS CUP2006-00002 M.I.T.C.H. Charter School PAGE 8 Fire and Life Safety: The fire district has no conditions of approval for this proposal. We do have issues with the property owners doing building modifications without the benefit of an appropriate plan review and the issuance of the required permits.John K. Dalby, Deputy Fire Marshal IlTualatin Valley Fire & Rescue, North Division14480 SW Jenkins RoadBeaverton, OR 97005-1152503-356-4723 Public Water Svstem: The applicant is not proposing any changes to the existing water service. Storm Water Qualitv: The City has agreed to enforce Surface Water Management (SWM) regulations established by Clean Water Services (CWS) Design and Construction Standards (adopted by Resolution and Order No. 00-7) which require the construction of on-site water quality facilities. The facilities shall be designed to remove 65 percent of the phosphorus contained in 100 percent of the storm water runoff generated from newly created impervious surfaces. In addition, a maintenance plan shall be submitted indicating the frequency and method to be used in keeping the facility maintained through the year. The applicant has submitted copies of plans from previous land use approvals that indicate two on-site water quality facilities have been constructed. These facilities are in poor condition and provide no water quality treatment due to lack of any plantings. The applicant is not proposing any changes to the impervious surface area; therefore no improvements are required of this applicant. Address Assiqnments: The City of Tigard is responsible for assigning addresses for parcels within the City of Tigard and within the Urban Service Boundary (USB). An addressing fee in the amount of$ 50.00 per address shall be assessed. This fee shall be paid to the City prior to issuance of permits. The addressing fee will only be required if the applicant is requesting a new address that is exclusive to the charter school. ENGINEERING COMMENTS CUP2006-00002 M.I.T.C.H. Charter School PAGE 9 . � Recommendations: THE FOLLOWING CONDITIONS SHALL BE SATISFIED PRIOR TO ISSUANCE OF THE BUILDING PERMIT: Submit to the Engineering Department (Kim McMillan, 639-4171, ext. 2642) for review and approval: . Prior to issuance of a building permit, the applicant shall pay the addressing fee, if applicable to the charter school. (STAFF CONTACT: Bethany Stewart, Engineering). THE FOLLOWING CONDITIONS SHALL BE SATISFIED PRIOR TO A FINAL BUILDING INSPECTION: Submit to the Engineering Department (Kim McMillan, 639-4171, ext. 2642) for review and approval: Additional right-of-way shall be dedicated to the Public along the frontage of 103`d Avenue to increase the right-of-way to 27 feet from the centerline. The description shall be tied to the existing right-of-way centerline. The dedication document shall be on City forms. Instructions are available from the Engineering Department. . Prior to final building inspection, the applicant shall trim the trees and bushes specified in the Traffic Analysis report in order to improve sight distance. . Prior to final building inspection, the applicanYs engineer shall submit final sight distance certification for the three access points. . The applicant shall either place the existing overhead utility lines along SW 103�d Avenue underground as a part of this project, or they shall pay the fee in-lieu of undergrounding. This fee is not required if the applicant, in conjunction with the City's Finance Department, can provide evidence of the fee being paid previously. The fee shall be calculated by the frontage of the site that is parallel to the utility lines and will be $ 35.00 per lineal foot. If the fee option is chosen, the amount will be $ 9590.00 and it shall be paid prior to final building inspection. ENGINEERING COMMENTS CUP2006-00002 M.I.T.C.H. Charter School PAGE 10 Emily Eng - M.I.T.C.H. Charter School CUP 2006-00002 Page 1 From: "Dalby, John K." <John.Dalby@tvfr.com> To: "Emily Eng" <Emily@tigard-or.gov> Date: 8/8/2006 9:06:50 AM Subject: M.I.T.C.H. Charter School CUP 2006-00002 The fire district has no conditions of approval for this proposal. We do have issues with the property owners doing building modifications without the benefit of an appropriate plan review and the issuance of the required permits. John K. Dalby, Deputy Fire Marshal II Tualatin Valley Fire & Rescue, North Division 14480 SW Jenkins Road Beaverton, OR 97005-1152 503-356-4723 CC: <brianb@tigard-or.gov>, <gary@tigard-or.gov> , Y PUBL� � HEARING NOT1�,�, & = REQUEST FOR COMMENTS ' ' ' NOTICE IS HEREBY GIVEN TH1�1T THE TIGARD CITY COUNCIL, �T � MEETING ON TUESDAY SEPTEMBER 26, 2006 AT 7:30 PM, IN THE TO��N HAL.L OF THE TIG�RD CIVIC CENTF.R, 13125 S`�' H1�LL BOL`LEV.�RD, TIG:�RD, ORFGON 97223 ��1L,1, I�OLD _1 PLI3LIC HE.�RING TO CONSIDI:R TIIE FOLLO`�'ING�PPLICATION: D�TE: .�ugust 11,3006 TO: Rob Murchison,Public Works Project Engineer FROM: Cit�-of Tigard Planning Division STr�FF CONTr1CT: Emil��Eng,.�ssistant Planner(x2712� Phone: (503) 639-4171 Fax: (503) 624-3681 F,mail: Emily(,a�ti�ard-or.gov ZONE CHANGE ANNEXATION(ZCA) 2006-00002 ➢ CACH CREEK AREA ANNEXATION Q REQUEST: The applicant is requesung annetation of twelre (12) parcels containing -�1.-�1 acres into the City of Tigard. LOCATION: :�butung and west of Sunrise Lane, and abutang and north of 5�� Bull i�fountain Road, including the right-of- way on Sunrise Lane, from the intersection of Sunrise Lane and SW 147�h Terrace westerly for approximately 1,200 feet and northerly for appro�rnately 1,630 feet;Washington Countt�Tax Assessor's i�1ap No. (��'CTN� 2S105DB,Tax Lots 6100,6200& 400; WCTM 2S105CD, Tax Lot 100; WCTM 2S108r1B, Tax Lots 1200 & 1201; WCTI�1 2S105DC, Tax Lots 100, 200, 300 & 400; and WCTM 2S105DD,Tax Lots 200 & 300. ZONE: R-7: Medium-Density Residenual District. The R-7 zoning district is designed to accommodate attached single-family homes, detached single-family homes with or without accessory residential units, at a minimum lot size of 5,000 square feet, and duplexes, at a minimum lot size of 10,000 square feet. Mobile home parks and subdivisions are also pern�itted outright. Some civic and insuturional uses are also permitted conditionally. APPLIC�BLE REVIEW CRITERIA: The approval standards for annexauons are described in Community Development Code Chapters 18.320 and 18.390,Comprehensive Plan Policies 2 and 10;ORS Chapter 222;and Metro Code Chapter 3.09. ,�r.r. DOCUt1EI�iTS _-�ND _-1PPLICr1BLE CRITERI� IN THE .1B0�'E-NOTED FILE _�RE .��'_�II..IBLE FOR INSPECTTON .�T NO COST OR COPIES C_1N BE OBT.�INED FOR TWENTI'-FI�'E CENTS (25fi) PER P.-1GE, OR TH�: CUIZK�N'1' K_-1'1'E CH:�RGED FOR COPIES :�T THE TI:�fE OF THE REQL'EST. .�1T LE_1ST FIFTEEN (15) D.�YS PRIOR TO THE HE.�RING, :� COPI' OF THE ST.1FF REPORT WILL BE .1�'_1IL..IBLE FOR INSPECTION .�T NO COST, OR .� COPY C.�N BE OBT�IINED FOR 'I'WENTY-FI�'E CENTS (25C) PER P�GE, OR THE CURRENT R�TE CH.-1RGED FOR COPIES .�T THE TI�iE OF THE REQUEST. INPOR:\L�TION IS_1LS0.��'_�IL.�BLE BY CONT:ICTING THE ST�1FF CONT:�CTS LISTED.1B0�'E. Attached is the Vicinity Map for yout review. FOR CITY DEPARTMENTS OR AGENCIES THAT PROVIDE PUBLIC SERVICES,YOL' MAY'BE CONTACTED FOR ADDITIONAL INFORMATION. From informarion supplied bt• �•arious departments and agencies and from other informarion available to our staff, a report and recommendation will be prepared and a decision will be rendered on the proposal in the near future. If you wish to comment on this applicauon,WE NEED YOUR COMMENTS BACK BY: AUGUST 25,2006. You may use the space provided below or attach a separate letter to return�-our comments. If�-ou are unable to res�ond by the above date,please phone the staff contact noted above with your comments and confirm �-our comments in writing as soon as possible. If�•ou have am� questions, contact the Ti�ard Planning Dicision, 13125 SW Hall Boulevard,Tigard,OR 97223. PLEASE CHECK THE FOLLOWING ITEMS THAT APPLY: � ��'e ha��e re��iewed the proposal and ha�-e no objections to it. _ Please contact of our office. Please refer to the enclosed letter or email. _ Written comments provided below: Name&Number of Person Commenting. - r)� � �, -- {i ��. . ; -�� - ...., -- -- i. - I _. ___ � ( I i � W-Fl -L � -J �� - __' , - �—±-,--= � ____i sw -- - - �� _� � � � , =` > �y ��j. r � � � j��W � � � � I � ��.� � � � " ° �� +�� .��' ''�; - , �-- � � ; _,af_ Cach Creek Area ' � —, �-._ , ; , — I I ; .� ' f � � s Annexation Sw 'RISTLECO � � '� r II1 r�l�C =� �� I Y _ � � �G � � ( -I 1 ; � 1 City of Tigard { I I ; sw Kuasnrv Oregon i.��L1T� I `�.�...�.�.��1 r.��.�.��1 W KLIYSHL I 1 � � �' pEW DR1VE 1 . -S � l � , ' ' � , ' _ I. 1 � I Q� � f — � � _� I I � I _ _�_.I Di — --_ I 1 f � , � � � � � coiyE �r�__ W I1 I j � -_ , - o. I_.__ t_� -� Proposed �� j �,�� __ , �__� AnnexationArea ' `-------'�-----� � I � ;sw --�vi�w� [� City of Tigard � �,, � I �� __�� `�. � � L I ? � � � — Taxlot Boundary ; ___ --- _— -- �`� , Proposed i i ; ;'� � '� - � ��---� Annexation � —__y �o� ' � i Area � � � I _. i ,� '_� � --- ; � _ _ G - Y _BAKER LN � ' � � - - , � �- � r_ ; � '`� � w;-- i I - _� I -- ' ----i � � � 1 , � � ,� �_ _ - i � � I �_ � -- _ � , � � � -- ---------------�_ ` Q j� � I , --� �`�osti� �h� �� j � � - _, i�� '� �, �� '�A�r�� _y� ..�ti��_,�.�._m.,��b_� ,�(��/\/ ' ��J= � ,� ` I ��Jw.w. .ro.�wx�4rde�.e.+A.i.��w. .�RO ' ; �— t�� _ I .. .. �......w. , '- � � �-- �u�i 'p �� _ ' � ' --- - � � -- � ��.� �Q —--- \_ - �\ � � ---- — _— `,•—�..._._.._.._.•.......�_ Y' � n n �� - � ,.,... �........_ ..,„, � i .� . , � •. � � —_ ��\� A� -� r ; % ; i , � ; � ` ! ��' ! i � _ i �' � _ I MAILING / NOTIFICATION RECORDS � . i AFFIDAVIT OF POSTING NOTICE OF A LAND USE PROPOSAL IMPORTANT NOTICE: THIS AFFIDAVIT MUST BE ACCOMPANIED BY A COPY OF THE NOTICE THAT WAS POSTED ON THE SITE. In the�Zatter of the Proposed Land Use Applicarions for: Land Use File Nos.: CUP2006-00002/VAR2006-00069 Land Use File Name: M.I.T.C.H. CHARTER SCHOOL I, Emil�� Eng, Assistant Planner for the Cit� of 1'igard, do affirm that I posted notice of the land use proposal affecting the land located at (state the approximate location(s) IF no address(s) and/or tax lot(s) cunently registered) ;�l��" �l J �L:' �'�X.�,l�' � ��; � �1 � c;:�i�' , and did � personally post norice of the Public Hearing on the proposed land use applicarion(s) b��means of weatherproof posting in the general vicinity of the affected territory, a eopy of said notice being hereto attached and b,y reference made a .--7 S�- ( part hereof,on the -�� day of .� u i u ,20C�-. J � �l C ignatur o I�etformed Posting (In the presence of the'V otar�-) (THIS SECTION FOR A STATE OF OREGON,NOTARY PUBLIC TO COMPLETE/NOTARIZE) STATE OF ) Counry of ) ss. } � Subscribed and sworn/affirmed before me on the�day of ' 20�. � �; OFFICWI SEAL � .� DIANE M JELDERKS - NOTARY PUBUC-OREGON COMMISSION N0.373021 ' " ` l ` 'C � MY COMMISSION EXPIRES SEPT.25,2007 ' `� -� � NOTARY PUBLIC O REGON My Commission Expi s: h:Alo},nn\Patn�m�a�[crs\affi�l�,n it nt p�i;ting f��r apPlicant to post�ublic hcarin�;.�iuc 0 I C E F P B L I H EARI ��~ N 4 C U G N i - '1'hc follo�uing�vill bc considcrcd by the Tigard Hearings Officer on Monday August 21, 200G at 7:00 PM at thc "1'igard Civic Ccntcr - '1'own Hall, 13125 SW Hall l�lvd.,'1'igard, Oregon. Both public oral and writtcn tcstimony is invited. The public hearing on this matter will bc conductcd in accordance wir.h the 'I'igard Municip al Code and the rules of procedurc adopted by the Council and available at City Hall or the rules of procedure set forth in Chapter 18.390. Testimony may be submitted in writing prior to or at the public hearing or verbally at the public hearing only. I�ailure to raise an issue in person or by letter at some point prior to the close of the hearing accompanied by statemcnts or evidence sufficient to afford the decision-maker an opportunity to respond to the issue precludes appeal to the Land Use �3oard of Appeal based on that issue. Failure to specify the criterion from the Community Development Code or Comprehensive Plan at which a comment is directed precludes an appeal based on that criterion. A copy of the application and all documents and evidence submitted by or on behalf of the applicant and the applicable criteria are avail; for inspection at no cost. A copy of the staff report will be made available for inspection at no cost at least seven (7) days prior to the hearing, and copies for all items can also be provided at a reasonable cost. Further information may be obtained from the Planning Division �staff contact: Emily Eng� at 13125 SW Hall Blvd., Tigard, Oregon 97223, by callin� 503-�i39-4171, or by cmail to emily�a,tiQard-or.gov . M . I .T . C . H . CHARTER SCHOOL CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT (CUP) 2006-00002/ ADJUSTMENT (VAR) 2006-000G9 REQUEST: The applicant is requesting Conditional Use Pertnit to allow the M.I.T.C.H. Charter School to occupy classroom space in the Calvin Presbyterian Church. M.I.T.C.H. is K-8 and has approximately 19F students. The school will lease the lower level of the church, which has 8 classrooms and a commons area. The school will also have access to a fenced playground on site. The applicant does not propose any changes to the church exterior or site. In addition, the applicant requests an adjustment to the bicycle parking standard of 6 spaces per classroom. The applicant desires to reduce the required number of bicycle parking spaces from 48 to 6. LOCATION: 10445 SW Canterbury Lane; Washington County Tax Map 2S111BC, Tax Lot 2800. ZONE: R-3.5: Low-Densit� Residential District. The R-3.5 zoning district is designed to accommodate detached single-family homes with or without accessory residential units at a minimum lot size of 10,000 square feet. Duplexes are permitted conditionally. Some civic and institutional uses are also permitted conditionally. APPLICABLE REVIEW CRITERIA: Community Development Code Chapters: 18.330, 18.360, 18.390, 18.510, 18.705, 18.725, 18.745, 18.755, 18.765, 18.780, 18.790, 18.795, and 18.810. -�� . - . � - - ---- -- ,AREA NOTIFIED I --- �...�. - - -- -- p (500') i n,n...au - -- -- q I _ ___ I l2tl11Ytl11 lf1I111111�1 lf�1tM��11 I u lifli�NAM�J _ __ -_ � J�Y— ___ —_— ��min,�.�n,,.�« �� ___________ '"'"""" _ � � -� FOR: Debi Lorence � . TE R__ _ - _ — ' �. � I �7� ��G e�� np mu �roew �wew� tstmaxa mmemM �em mmexn� I — _ �r': 2S 111 BC� �(�oo m�wamr � mn�aum mmemu mme�� ^�� _. —- —- — -- — — ,�. - ---�N T , ��mm , �� - - �- - --- Property owner information � ;,, ��„ m,w.aw I i is valid for 3 months from - �w � �`� the date printed on this map. _ 'C .-— __ li11Mp}iM !litNpllN I lT` \__ � _ ___ CANTERBURY LN _ I �«� �� I�_ I _ �,� mmanw m�ar�a miaar�m m�aaM W �� ' _ -,.u. Q,� — - xnraaM nn.aww mnaew � mma�n m � : � mnaxr mmaan MURDOCK ST --- ♦ -- N � � 8� - - _ 0 100 200 300 400 Feet B I�J - � � --�— - 1"=307fee1 � � � — — 1 a r � � m DELMONTE DR _ -` � �� mm _ --- •I � � Informatian on this map is far penaral localion only and L should be venfied with the Develoqnent Servicea Diviaion. _ — 13725 SW Hell Blvd I Tigard,OR 97223 � I � (503)639-4171 j http:1/wNw.ci.tigard or.us Community Development Plot date:Jul 12,2006;C:lmagicVNAGIC03.APR 2S110AD-00510 2S1116C-00200 BACKHAUS BRENDA BOGERT MARK H AND 10627 SW CANTERBURY LN MARY E TIGARD,OR 97224 14445 SW 100TH TIGARD,OR 97223 2 10AD-00500 2S110AD-01800 BAC U ENDA BROWN SCOTT C 106 NTERBURY LN 14630 SW 106TH AVE ARD,OR 24 TIGARD,OR 97224 2S1116C-03600 2S1116C-01400 BATES STEPHEN CHRISTOPHER AND BUEHLER GREGORY J&SARA L JODETTE SUGDEN 10145 SW VIEW TER 10430 SW VIEW TERRACE TIGARD,OR 97224 TIGARD,OR 97224 2S111BC-010D0 2S110AD-04240 BAUMAN C WAYNE&MARY BUKRES MIWAKO 10270 SW VIEW TER 14615 SW 106TH AVE TIGARD, OR 97224 TIGARD,OR 97224 2S110AD-04204 2 10AD-04203 BEHRENDT ROBERT F AND SHARON A BU S AKO 1450 S KIHEI RD C205 146 106TH AVE KIHEI,HI 96753 GARD,0 97224 110AD-04250 2S110AD-02810 B EN OBERT F AND SHARON A CAGLE THOMAS E 145 EI RD C2D5 PO BOX 26 EI, HI 9 53 TUALATIN,OR 97062 2S110AD-02300 2S110AD-02800 BENZ FRED S CA TH AS E PO BOX 230029 PO B TIGARD,OR 97281 ALATIN,O 97062 110AD-02310 2S110AD-09400 BE S CALWAY HILL HOMEOWNERS ASSOC PO 2 9 BY STAN ADKINS BUILDER INC ARD,OR 97281 8459 SW BARBUR BLVD PORTLAND,OR 97223 2S111BC-03800 2 OAD-09600 BERTULEIT MIRIAM RlDANIEL TRS CALW ILL HO WNERS ASSOC 10390 SW VIEW TERRACE ST BY STAN A BUILDER INC TIGARD,OR 97224 8459 BARB BLVD P TLAND,OR 97 23 2S111BC-02900 2 110AD-09500 BOEHR IRWIN I AND PATRICIA L CAL Y HILL H EOWNERS ASSOC TRUSTEES BY STA S BUILDER INC 10470 SW VIEW TERRACE 8459 BA UR BLVD TIGARD,OR 97224 RTLAND,OR 97223 2 110AD-01200 2S110AD-003D0 CA AY HILL HO EOWNERS ASSOC DIXON CANDICE M BY ST A S BUILDER INC 10631 SW CANTERBURY LN 8459 BUR BLVD TIGARD,OR 97224 TLAND,O 97223 2S110AA-01500 2 10AD-00310 CANTERBURY PLACE LLC DIX C CE M 109 E 13TH ST 1063 ANTERBURY LN VANCOUVER,WA 98660 ARD,OR 7224 2S111 BC-04800 2S110AD-02100 COOPER THEODORE P& DREYER JOAN C SHELLEY R 14678 SW 106TH AVE 10198 5W INEZ 5T TIGARD,OR 97224 TIGARD,OR 97224 2S 111 BC-02503 2 10AD-02110 CORLISS JAMES UCORA K DRE J C 9750 SW INEZ 1467 6TH AVE TIGARD,OR 97224 ARD,OR 7224 2S110AD-02000 2S111BC-03001 CRIST DAVID L& BARBARA A DUNKLEE JOHN&MARGARET 14672 SW 106TH AVE 10440 SW VIEW TERR TIGARD,OR 97223 TIGARD,OR 97224 2 110AD-02010 25111 BB-02400 CR DAVID 8 BARBARA A DURFEE DAVID A 8 SHIRLY M 14672 6TH AVE 10460 5W AMANDA CT RD,OR 7223 TIGARD,OR 97224 2S1116C-o2ao1 2S1t166-ot2oo CROSS ROGER K III&CLARE E FABER ROBERT C&MARGARET A 10155 SW MURDOCK ST 14230 SW 103RD TIGARD,OR 97224 TIGARD,OR 97224 25110AD-00200 2S111 BC-03700 DANCESCU CHRISTIAN FAIRLEY RONALD S&KAREN S 10633 SW CANTERBURY LN 10420 SW VIEW TERRACE TIGARD,OR 97224 TIGARD,OR 97224 2 110AD-00210 2S111 BC-02300 DA SCU RISTIAN FANTZ GARY E AND GAY 1063 ANTERBURY LN 14530 SW 103RD AVE T ARD,OR 24 TIGARD,OR 97223 2S111BC-03500 2S110AD-08600 DAVIS EDWARD&SUSAN LYNN FISHER ELEANOR 10445 SW VIEW TER 10505 SW CANTERBURY LN TIGARD,OR 97224 TIGARD,OR 97224 zs>>�ec-oasoo zsi�iac-oa�oo FRISWOLD JAMES E&DIANA J HEYWORTH SEAN A&MEGAN E 14700 SW 103RD AVE 6333 SW GARDEN HOME RD TIGARD,OR 97224 PORTLAND,OR 97219 2S111BC-02500 2S110AD-D0910 GALICH PATRICIA& HOYT JOYCE MITCHELL MICHAEL W 10619 SW CANTERBURY LN 10205 SW MURDOCK ST TIGARD,OR 97224 TIGARD,OR 97224 2S1116C-02504 2S110AD-00900 GA H PATRICI 8 YT JOY MITCH HAEL W 106 CANTERBURY LN 10205 DOCK ST AR , R 97224 TI RD,OR 9 24 2S110AD-�4100 2S110AD-04000 GALYEN SUSAN E HRICSINA-DOWNEY KATHERINE A 14641 SW 106TH AVE 14647 SW 106TH AVE TIGARD,OR 97224 TIGARD,OR 97224 2S111 BC-03400 2S110AD-00810 GOSSELIN WILLIAM C AND JJ RENTALS LLC BETTY JEAN 14803 SW 106TH AVE 10405 SW VIEW TERR. TIGARD,OR 97224 TIGARD,OR 97223 2S1118C-04600 110AD-00800 GOTTER SAMUEL A&VICTORIA L JJ NTA LC 10125 SW MURDOCK ST 1480 106TH AVE TIGARD, OR 97224 T ARD,0 7224 2S110AD-01900 2S1118C-03300 HAASE JOHN G JOHNSON DOUGLAS EDWARD AND 14666 SW 106TH AVE SUE ANN TIGARD,OR 97224 10375 SW VIEW TERRACE TIGARD,OR 97223 2S110AD-01910 2511186-00900 H E J G KASTEL CHARLES G&MARY J TRS 146 106TH AVE 14259 SW 100TH T ARD, O 7224 TIGARD,OR 97224 2S110A0-01500 2 11BB-01100 HADLEY MICHAEL F KA L C LES G 8 MARY J TRS 10540 SW CANTERBURY LN 1425 OOTH TIGARD,OR 97224 ARD,0 7224 2S111BB-01800 2S110AD-01700 HEISE MONICA JO-ANN KLABO LISA M 10390 SW AMANDA CT 14620 SW 106TH AVE TIGARD,OR 97224 TIGARD,OR 97224 2S1116B-02200 2S110AD-01600 KLETZEL E SCOT&KRISTI S MCGUIRE STEPHEN 10479 SW AMANDA CT 10550 SW CANTERBURY LN TIGARD,OR 97224 TIGARD,OR 97224 2S111 BC-00800 2S110AD-032D0 KNIGHT W A MCNALLY BELINDA C 10175 SW INEZ ST 10627 SW MURDOCK ST TIGARD,OR 97224 TIGARD,OR 97224 2S1116C-o21o0 251118C-04000 LITTLETON DAVID A AND WANDA J MILLER JUDITH A 8�PAUL E TRS 10090 SW INEZ 10330 SW VIEW TER TIGARD,OR 97224 TIGARD,OR 97224 2S111BC-03200 2S111BC-02700 LUKE-DORF INC MILLER PAUL E 8�JUDITH A 10313 SW 69TH AVE 10380 SW CANTERBURY TIGARD,OR 97223 TIGARD,OR 97224 2S110AD-02710 2S1178B-02500 LYNCH DORIS M MONTES GLORIA I&CARLOS A 10579 SW MURDOCK ST 10440 SW AMANDA CT TIGARD,OR 97224 TIGARD,OR 97223 2S110AD-02700 251116C-01500 LY DO M MUDROW MICHAEL T&DIANE C 10579 MURDOCK ST 10185 SW VIEW TERR T RD,O 97224 TIGARD,OR 97224 2S110AD-03100 2S110AD-02410 MARSH BONNIE S NEVAN NICOL 10621 SW MURDOCK ST 10561 SW MURDOCK ST TIGARD,OR 97224 TIGARD,OR 97224 2S1116C-00700 2 tOAD-02400 MCBRIDE GLEN W& NE NI L JANET HALL 1056 URDOCK ST 10135 SW INEZ T ARD,0 97224 TIGARD,OR 97224 2S110AD-00700 2S111BC-02302 MCELHANEY JONATHAN D NOKES DESTON S 10623 SW CANTERBURY LN 15532 SW PACIFIC HWY TIGARD,OR 97224 STE C-1 B#22 TIGARD,OR 97224 110AD-00710 2S111BC-02303 M HAN ONATHAN D NOKES KATHY EVELYN 10623 CANTERBURY LN PO BOX 230231 RD, 97224 TIGARD,OR 97281 2S110AD-04230 2S110AD-02510 O'HAGAN JEANNINE REDELL JULIE L 14625 SW 106TH AVE 10567 SW MURDOCK ST TIGARD,OR 97224 TIGARD,OR 97224 110AD-0420 2 10AD-02500 O' A ANNINE RED J L 1462 106TH AVE 10567 URDOCK ST T ARD,O 97224 TI RD,OR 7224 2S110AD-03300 2S1116B-01000 OTTERSON JACK W&ESTHER M REEDER MARY R 38177 S DESERT STAR DR 14300 SW 103RD AVE TUCSON,AZ 85739 TIGARD,OR 97223 2S111BC-00600 2S111BB-o26o0 PARTINGTON BRIGITTE ROCHE RICHARD L&KELLY J LIVING TRUST 10420 5W AMANDA CT BY B PARTINGTON TRUSTEE TIGARD,OR 97224 10085 SW INEZ ST TIGARD,OR 97224 2S111BC-01100 2S111BC-01200 PHILLIPS LOIS JEAN SEARS ALLEN C 20290 SW COMANCHE TER c/o WILLIAMS GRANT&LANA TUALATIN,OR 97062 10190 SW VIEW TER TIGARD,OR 97224 2S110AD-01000 2S110AD-01100 POWELL JACQUELINE S SHIBLEY KENT D&RUTH K P O BOX 23322 10615 SW CANTERBURY LN TIGARD,OR 97281 TIGARD,OR 97224 110AD-0101 2 10AD-01110 PO LL CQUELINE S SHI Y T D&RUTH K P O 3322 1061 ANTERBURYLN T ARD,O 97281 ARD,OR 7224 25111 BC-02800 25111 BB-D2300 PRESBYTERY OF PORTLAND THE SPRAGUE DEREK G 8�KORINDA E CALVIN PRESBYTERIAN CHURCH 10480 SW AMANDA CT 10445 SW CANTERBURY LN TIGARD,OR 97224 TIGARD,OR 97224 2S111BC-00900 251118C-01700 PRESBYTERY OF THE CASCADES STACK RICHARD W JUDITH C BY CALVIN PRESBYTERIAN CHURCH 10265 SW VIEW TERR 10445 SW CANTERBURY LN TIGARD,OR 97224 TIGARD,OR 97224 2S111BC-03900 2S170AD-02600 RAUDY BEVERLY STANLEY CHERIE 10360 SW VIEW TERRACE 10573 SW MURDOCK TIGARD,OR 97224 TIGARD,OR 97224 110AD-02610 2S110AD-04220 STA E HERIE TUCKER NOEL EDWARD 1057 MURDOCK 14635 SW 106TH AVE T ARD,OR 97224 TIGARD,OR 97224 2S110AD-00110 110A�-0420 STRATTON CHARLA MARIE T E EL EDWARD 10635 SW CANTERBURY LN 146 1�6TH AVE TiGARD,OR 97224 ARD, 97224 2S170AD-00100 2S170AD-02210 ST O ARLA MARIE UHLER ANN S& 1063 ANTERBURY LN COATES LAURA C T ARD,OR 7224 14684 SW 106TH AVE TIGARD,OR 97224 2S110AD-03700 110AD-02200 STRICKLER JAMES P& U ANN TINA R COATE RA C 14677 SW 106TH AVE 146 W TH AVE TIGARD,OR 97223 ARD,OR 97224 2S110AD-03600 2S111BC-01300 TAYLOR CHARLES C II 8 AVA C UM EUNKYU C&KWANG Y 14685 SW 106TH AVE 10150 SW VIEW TER TIGARD,OR 97224 TIGARD,OR 97224 2S110AD-08801 OAD-08690 TIGARD COLONY LIMITED PARTNERSHI UNK OWNER 380 UNION ST STE 300 , WEST SPRINGFIELD, MA 1089 2 110AD-08700 2S110AD-03900 TI D C Y LIMITED PARTNERSHI WEBBER MICHAEL D 380 U ST STE 300 9612 171ST AVE SE T SPRI IELD, MA 1089 SNOHOMISH,WA 98290 2S110AD-08701 2S110AD-03800 TI D CO Y LIMITED PARTNERSHI WENSTRAND ROBERT G 380 U ST STE 3D0 14661 SW 106TH AVE T SPRI IELD, MA 1089 TIGARD,OR 97224 2S1116C-o26o0 2S111BC-044o0 TIGARD WATER DISTRICT WILDER RANDY A 8�JANETTE L 8777 SW BURNHAM ST COCHRAN BOYD C 8 WANDA J PO BOX 23000 WESTENHAVER DANA L&MARY LYN T TIGARD,OR 97223 14563 SW 100TH AVE TIGARD,OR 97224 25111BC-03100 2S111BC-04300 TIMMINS KELLY A 8 KATHLEEN M WILDER RANDY A/JANETTE L 14335 SW 103RD AVE 14541 SW 100TH AVE TIGARD,OR 97224 TIGARD,OR 97224 2S 110A D-�0400 WILLEMS ATHENA 10629 SW CENTERBURY LN TIGARD,OR 97224 2S1 A�-00410 WILLE ATH A 10629 TERBURY LN T RD,OR 97 4 2S110AD-00610 WILLIAMS TERRY T 10625 SW CANTERBURY LN TIGARD,OR 97224 2 10AD-00600 WILL S T Y T 1062 NTERBURY LN ARD,OR 9 24 2S1116C-o16o0 YOUR ESTATE PO BOX 738 VANCOUVER,WA 98666 . , � Josh Thomas Gretchen Buehner 10395 SW Bonanza 13249 SW 136th Place Tigard, OR 97224 Tigard, OR 97224 Kristen Miller 8940 SW Edgewood Street Tigard, OR 97223 Paul Owen 10335 SW Highland Drive Tigard, OR 97224 Tim Esau PO Box 230695 Tigard, OR 97281 CPO 4B 16200 SW Pacific Highway, Suite H242 Tigard, OR 97224 Ross Sundberg 16382 SW 104th Avenue Tigard, OR 97224 Brian Wegener 9830 SW Kimberly Drive Tigard, OR 97224 Joseph Dyar 10285 SW Highland Drive Tigard, OR 97224-4668 Rex Caffall 13205 SW Village Glenn Tigard, OR 97223 John Frewing 7110 SW Lola Lane Tigard, OR 97223 CITY OF TIGARD - SOUTH INTERESTED PARTIES fov. I of I1 (i:lcurnlnlsetu�\IabeIslCIT South.docl UPDATED: 12-Mav-05 ' . � CITY OF TIGARD � tOMMUNfTY DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT ,� PLANNING DIVISION � 13125 SW HALL BOULEVARD TIGARD, OREGON 91223 � , a ; PHONE: 503-639-4171 FA%: 503-624-3681 (Attn: Patty/Planning) � � � D U � � � ° ° Q o o �� UAY,�7U� � � Property owner information is vaiid for 3 months from the date of your request INDICATE ALL PROJECT MAP & TAX LOT NUMBERS (i.e. 1 S134AB, Tax Lot 00100) OR THE ADDRESSES FOR ALL PROJECT PARCELS BELOW: ��i/1,8� ��'G� OL � � � � r _ 11 �,t.(�C� � �� GI�r�-��-� PLEASE BE AWARE THAT �NLY 1 SET OF LABELS WILL BE PROVIDED AT THIS TIME FOR HOLDING YOUR NEIGHBORHOOD MEETING. After submitting your land use application to the City, and the prol'ect planner has reviewed your application for completeness, you will be notified by means of an incompleteness letter to obtain your 2 final sets o�labels. . The 2 final sets of labels need to be placed on envelopes (no self-adhesive envelopes please) with first class letter-rate ostage on the envelopes in the form ofi posta e stamps (no metered envelopes and no return address�and resubmitted to the City for the purp ose o� roviding notice to property owners of the proposed land use application and the decision. The Z sets o�envelopes must be kept separate. The person listed below will be called to pick up and pay for the labels when they are ready. .� . � ` NAME OF CONTACT PERSON: ��'� �.�� t �� PHONE: ?�� cJ�3�' �C I I lc � FAX: EMAIL: Ir;.-� c ti (c.:+��+�i,ch�.��1•a-� This request may be mailed, faxed or hand delivered to the City of Tigard. Please allow a 2-day minimum for processing reques�s. Upon completion of your request the contact person will be calletl to pick up their request that will be placed in "Will CaIP' by their last name, at the Community Development Reception Desk. The cost of processing your request must be paid at the time of pick up, as exact cost can not be pre-determined. PLEASE NOTE: FOR REASONS OF ACCURACY, ONLY ORIGINAL MAILING LASELS PROVIDED BY THE CITY VS. RE-TYPED MAlLING LABELS WILL BE ACCEPTED. Cost Description: $11 to generate the mailing list, plus$2 per sheet for printing the list onto labels(20 addresses per sheet). • Then, multi I the cost to pnnt one set of labels b the number of sets requested. EXAMPLE COST FOR THIS REQUEST 4 sheets of labels x$2/sheet= 8.00 x 2 sets= $16.00 � sheet(s)of labels x$2/sheet=�x�sets= n 1 sheets of labels x$2lsheet for interested parties x 2 sets= $ 4.00 �sheet(s)of labels x$2/sheet for int rested parties=$ o� x�sets= GENERATE LIST = $11 00 GENERATE LIST = TOTAL = $31.D0 � TOTAL = �� 2S111 BC-02800 PRESBYTERY OF PORTLAND THE CALVIN PRESBYTERIAN CHURCH r ��{J� 10445 SW CANTERBURY LN � TIGARD,OR 97224 � �/r� � ID d� / � i.r+� � �. <,39 {1/1.1:?' C.��. .>�_�r .(1vL �°"»""„'w►,,.�,,,. '�— ,,;� p t?F30X 230�,75 F'�..,"�;�.�L:�4f�t�� :`1;�. ��;�:'. � TIG AAl� OR 97'?81-^',75 � � �: � :1"? ll.J�. .��;.+�'-s� i�'t+�t � l. ,�r�""""*�„�..�� : a.w""""'""�+,...�;,. �µ ,,,�,��,a.;�, / 2S11;BC-01600 YOJR EST t PO BOX 8 VANC VER,WA 98666 NTXIE: '�70 1 01 071'14/AE F7ETURN 70 SEND�R NO SUC!-1 NUMQER UNABL� TO F'OR1JARp SC: 97.2Ei10.57S7S *152'9—iSO47—12-40 '#i��ei�d3'�S ll,l��l�„1��1�1l,�1�„�Illi��l�i�l��l�l�l�l,,,l,l,l„I��il •T• � �' S � o July 12, 2006 ti o �RTER ,SG� Muhi-sensory lnstruction �� M.I.T.C.H. Charte�'SChool Teaching Children Hands-on Dear Interested Party, The mission o f M.I.T.C.H. is to use commonly shored M.I.T.C.H. Charter School is applying to locate at the Calvin Presbyterian knowledge to build the Church located at 10445 S.W. Canterbury and 103rd,Tigard Oregon. We foundation for educaoon where are proposing a Ki.ndergarten through eighth grade, one class per grade, oll swdents leom the school at this location. M.I.T.C.H. Charter School would not be making criticol elemenu of reoding, any interior or exterior changes to the building or site. wriUng and thinking skills. These educotiona!concepts Prior to applying to the City of Tigazd for the necessary land use are based upon the approvals, M.I.T.C.H. Charter School officials will be available to discuss Core Knowledge Sequence the proposal in more detail with the surrounding property owners and cumculum obtoined(rom residents. You are invited to attend a meeting on: grade-by-grade sequence o f specif c content in all 7uly 27, 2006 core academics— 7:00 p.II1. leaming burlds upon leaming. C3��1 PreSb�Cll�l ChlUC�1 1�445 .S.w. C3riteIbllry Teaching to the Tigaz'd, OR 97223 whole child; raising the bar of Please notice this will be an informational meeting on preliminary plans. edu�at�o�ai eXPe�rac�o�5. These plans maybe altered prior to the submittal of the application to the , city. Grades K-8 M.I.T.C.H. Charter school representatives look forward to addressing your Core Knowledge School questions on the 27�`, or you may call the schoo1503-639-5757 at any time. Riggs Language Arts , Sincerely, Saxon Math G�—'�� Q�� Debi Lorence 503-639-5757 Founder/Principal M.I.T.C.H. Charter School � Attachment enclosed PO Box 230575 ___ -- . -- — — Tigard,OR 9728 I-0575 www.mitchcharterschool.org mitch@mitchcharterschool.org • � �E06RAPHICINFORMATION lYSTEM �,...n., AREA NOTIFIED m,,,,,,,„ (500') - �, �� ,,,,,, ,�„„,� nn..n,.. a mmmm m�enn� �^�� ——————————— ""�""" FOR: Debi Lorence TE • �G rne�»��mnn �mua�nn��nm� m�sanm m�nnu m��„ �m mmemn �. 2S 111 BC� ��oo mmnwa mnnnm m��n :e� �- "�� Property owner information � m�wmm �� is vall�for 3 montha from m a �� the date printed on thls map. JE CANTERBURY „++�� m� �� TllT�pi1N UIIAMlMf � liflrMlttl lfll�Mp1� NII w M � mnaww mrsew�w n �� _ � ansptw� m Q� m � mna�wr n mmenm MURDOCK ST . - � N � � � e� o ,00 zoo 300 4D0 feel e ,-=30��, � �8 ' - ,, n � m DELMONTE DR ' � �C� mm t . � � Informafion on Ihis map is(or genero�iocatlon only�M tAould be wrfliad with the Devslopme�Servkas Division. 13125 SW HaA Bivd Tigard,OR 97223 (503)839-1171 � Mlp Jlwnw.ci.l Ipa rd.or.w Community Development Plot date:Jul 12.2006:C_�maoicwlArlc:n3 APR il . I M.l.T.C.�i. �^}�n��t �c��-�..��a� �� y�z �� I� P o $ox 23o5�s TIGARD OR 97.2P1-�575 �� ,L �� ,€ � � �' .''"�'�,,,�`,u�n� ' �,�i �r_� �. _ I I I Kristen Miller 8940 5�N Edgewood Street Tigard, OR 97223 x ��o M� :t ��c�s x �i o°rr ia�� POFtLJAFtC3 TZNIE ECXF� F27'N 'T�D SEN[� MILLf'1? S 7656 T'TARDEE 14V'E L.AKE 05WEG0 OR 9703.5— 5+43� .j f: ��.+' � RETURN T�D SENDER s�-zeiro��s ll�l��l��ly�l,ll,�l,��)111>>„l�I�I��,I�lsl�l��►l�l�l►�I�►II , _ •T• � �' y � o July 12, 2006 ti o �RTER �SG� Muki-sensory lnstruction �� M.I.T.C.H. Charter School Teaching Children Nands-on Dear Interested Party, The mission of M.I.T.C.H. is to use commonly shored M.I.T.C.H. Charter School is applying to locate at the Calvin Presbyterian knowledge to build the Church located at 10445 S.W. Canterbury and 103rd,Tigard Oregon. We foundotion(or educa[ion where are proposing a Kindergarten through eighth grade, one class per grade, oll students learn the school at this location. M.I.T.C.H. Charter School would not be making criocal elemenu o f reading any interior or exterior changes to the building or site. wriUng and thinking skills. These educational concepts Prior to applying to the City of Tigard for the necessary land use are bosed upon the approvals, M.I.T.C.H. Charter 5chool officials will be available to discuss Core Knowledge Sequence the proposal in more detail with the surrounding property owners and curriculum obtained from residents. You are invited to attend a meeting on: grade-by-grade sequence o f specifc content in all July 27,2006 core academia— _ 7:OO.p.m. leorning builds upon leoming. C3��PT6Sb�eT'lall C�1l1TC�1 10445 S.W. Canterbury Teaching to the Tigard, OR 97223 whole child; raising the bar of Please notice this will be an informational meeting on preliminary plans. ed��at�o�ai exPe�t;ons. '�ese plans maybe altered prior to the submittal of the application to the , city. Grades K-S M.I.T.C.H. Charter school representatives look forward to addressing your Core!G�owledge School questions on the 27�, or you may ca11 the schoo1503-639-5757 at any time. Riggs Language Arts � S121CeI'ely, Saxon Math /�-�`�"" V �� G L Debi Lorence 503-639-5757 Founder/Principal M.I.T.C.H. Charter School � Attachment enclosed PO Box 230575 ; - --_ ...__ __ _ — -- -- ---- Tigard,OR 9728I-0575 www.mitchchartersch oo l.o rg mitch@mitchcharterschool,org • � � - . 6EOORAPHICIHFORMATION SYSTEM AREA NOTIFIED n mro�rnn ,�,„,,,�„ (500') pllp lillfMt111 lifION11�1 }ItT1111�1�1 li1I�q71U N � ti/II�„f11�!lIII�CtNN �TM� ___________ """""" FOR: Debi Lorence TE • �G � " " �� ° °""""" RE: 2S 111 BC, 2800 �� „:�� T '" Property owner information ""'""`m m�nnn is valid for 3 mon4hs from the date prinled on thia map. �G !lI�Ml�II RIIAMIN � CANTERBURY �+�*� �„�„N �...«.� �,,.a� �� .e� �.� 1tl�M 1IMI�f 1M1 �0 �t � !l11A�MM liIIAp1�N IM��7� il�II�NlIN 1tIAMMNI = lif�AO/}Ni m � mnnfx� m m �� MURDOCK ST ♦ N � � B� 0 100 200 300 4D0 Feel . 8 t..=307 feel � �e � - a a � p� DELMONTE DR � �[� mm � � InfortnaHon on Ihis map is for generel locelion only end thald be verified with the Developrtxnt Services Oivision. 13125 SW Hetl Blvd Tipard,OR 87223 (503)638-I171 � hltp:lM+nw.eLtipard.or.us Community Development Plot date:Jul 12.2DD6:C:lmaoicUNArIC:D3 APR �� AFFIDAVIT OF MAILING - w� � I, Patricia L. Lunsfond, bein�first du�ly sworn/affirrri,on oath depose and saythat I am a SeniorAdministrative Specialist for the City of Tigard, Waslungton County,Oregon and that I served the following: {aeckAppmpriuc Box(s)ESebwJ 0 NOTTC� OF PUBLIC HEARING FOR CUP2006-00002/VAR2006-00069-M.I.T.G�L Q�ARTER SCHOOL (F�e NolName Reference) � AMENDEDNCYI'iC� HEARING BODY: HEARING DATE: ❑ Caty of Tigard Plaruung Director � Tigard Hearings Officer (8/21/2006) ❑ T�igard Plaruung Comrrvssion ❑ Tigard City Council A copy of the said notice being hereto attached,marked Exhibit"A",and by reference made a part hereof,was mailed to each named person(s) at the address(s) shown on the attached list(s),marked Exhibit"B",and by reference made a part hereof,on July 31,2006, and deposited in the United States Mail on July 31,2006,postage prepaid. , . '�� erso P d Notice STATE OF ORE GON County of Washington ss. City of Tigard Subscribed and sworn/affirmed before me on the � 2-�" dayof �-� �� ,2006. c�r 1=�u�.:L:;c�f�L ��' �,y-� KE�i��'«J N'�IEf��e't�,hl �� ora��v�ua�.�c-��-r_�;��; ; coMn�issir,.,, .,�., : r�v con�n�iss�;��E� , . NO ARY PUBLIC OF OREGON My Conuivssion E�ires;�z.d'�zc»� NOTICE�['O MORTGAGEE ENHOLDER,VENDOR OR� ,LER EXH l 6 THE TIG;IRD DE�'FLOPbiENT CODE R�;IZUIRES TH�-1T IF I'OU RECF.I\'1?'I'I IIS?�01TCE, �� IT SH.-1LL BE PR0�1P'1Z�'FORIX!1RDED TO THE PURCH:ISF,R. . � ' � PUBLIC HEARING N�TICE NOTICE IS HEREBY GNEN TH11T THE TIGARD HEARINGS OFFICER, �1T �1 i��ETING ON MONDAY AUGUST 21, 2006 AT 7:00 PM, IN THE TO��N H.�I.L OF THE TIG.�RD CI�'IC CENTER r1T 13125 S��' T-TAT"T, BOULEV�-1RD,TIG:-�RD,OREGON 97?23��TLL CONSIllF.R'I'I IE I�'OLLO��TNG�PPLIC.ITION: FILE NOS.: CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT (CUP) 200G-00002 ADJUSTMENT (VAR) 200G-000G9 FILE TITLE: M.I.T.C.H. CHARTER SCHOOL APPLICANT: �i.I.T.C.H. Charter Sch�ol OWNER: Cah•in Presbvterian Church PO Box 230575 10445 SW Canterbury Lane Tigard, OR 97223 Tigard, OR 97224 APPLICANT'S Ed l�iurphy REP: Parari-LDC Design Group 20085 NW Tanasbourne Drive Hillsboro, OR 97124 REQUEST: The applicant is requesting Condirional Use Permit to allow the iV1.LT.C.H. Charter Sch�ol to occupy classroom space in the Calvin Presbyterian Church. M.I.T.C.H. is K-8 and has approximately 198 students. The school will lease the lower level of the church, which has 8 classrooms and a commons area. The school will also have access to a fenced playground on site. The applicant does not propose any changes t� the church exterior or site. In addition, the applicant requests an adjustment to the bicycle parking standard of 6 spaces per classroom. The applicant desires to reduce the required number of bicycle parking spaces from 48 to 6. LOCATION: 10445 SW Canterbury Lane;Washington Counry Tax Map 2S111BC,Tax Lot 2800. ZONE: R-3.5: Low-Densit� Residential District. The R-3.5 zoning district is designed to accommodate detached single-family homes with or without accessory residential units at a ininimum lot size of 10,000 square feet. Duplexes are permitted condirionally. Some civic and insriturional uses are also permitted condirionally�. APPLICABLE REVIEW CRITERIA: Communin- Development Code Chapters: 18.330, 18.3G0, 18.390, 18.510, 18.705, 18.725, 18.745, 18.755, 18.765, 18.780, 18.790, 18.795,and 18.810. 'THE PUBLIC HE.�RING ON THIS M�`I"I'ER WILL BE CONDUCTED IN .�CCORD�NCE ��'ITH THE RL'LES OF CHIIPTER 18.390 OF THE COMML?NITY DEVELOPMENT CODE AND RliLES OF PROCEDURES ADOPTED BY THE TIGr1RD CITY COUNCIL AND r1Vr1IL�1BLE t1T CITY HALL. ASSISTIVE LISTENING DEVICES ARE r1VAILr1BLE FOR PERSONS WITH IMPr1IRED HEr�RING. THE CITY WILL A1.5(� ENDEi1VOR TO r'�RRANGE FOR QUALIFIED SIGN Lr1NGUAGE INTERPRETERS AND QUALIFIED BILINGUAL INTERPRETERS UPON REQUEST. PLEASE CALL (503) G39-4171, EXT. 2438 (VOICE) OR (503) 684-2772 (TDD-TELECOMMUNIC�ITIONS DEVICES FOR THE DEr1F� NO LESS THr1N ONE WEEK PRIOR TO THE HEARING TO MAKE ARR�INGEMENTS. ANYONE WISHING TO PRESENT� I`TEN TESTIMONY ON THIS PROPOSL .�CTION �L�1Y DO SO IN W'RITING PRIOR TO OR �1T THE PL'BLIC HEARING. OR�1L TESTIMONY i��.�1Y BE PRESENTED AT THE PL'BLIC HE��RING. �T THE PUBLIC HF�IRING, THE HE2�RINGS OFFICER ��'ILL RECEIVE r1 ST:1FF REPORT PRESENTr1TION FROi�i THE CITY PI.�NNER, OPEN THE PL�BLIC HE�IRING,?�ND INVITE BOTH OR1L AND�Y/RITTEN TESTIMONY. THE HEr1RINGS OFFICER M.�1Y CONTINUE THE PUBLIC HF�IRING TO r1NOTHER MEETING TO OBTr1IN ADDITIONIIL INFORI��ITION OR CLOSE THE PUBLIC HEIIRING 11ND Tr1KE 11CTION ON THE APPLIC�TION. IF r1 PERSON SUBMITS EVIDENCE IN SUPPOR'1' "1'O '1'H�: Al'1'LICIITI(�N LESS T�-�r1N SEVEN (7) DAYS PRIOR TO THE PUBLIC HEr1RING,�1NY PARTY IS ENTITLED TO REQUEST r1 CONTINU�INCE OF THE HE2�RING. IF THERE IS NO CONTINU�INCE GR�INTED AT THE HF�IRING,ANY Pr1RTICIPr1NT IN THE HF�IRING M�1Y REQUEST TI3�-�T THE RECORD REM�IIN OPEN FOR �T LF�1ST SEVEN (7) D�1YS �1FTER THE HE�IRING. 11 REQUEST TH�-1T THE RECORD REMAIN OPEN CAN BE M�DE ONLY�1T THE FIRST EVIDENTI�'�RY I IF�IRING (ORS 197.7G3(6). INCLL'DED IN THIS NOTICE IS � LIST OF APPROV?�L CRIT'ERL� �PPLICIIBLE TO THE REQUEST FROM THE TIG�IRD COMl'�1L'NITY DEVELOPMENT CODE �ND THE TIG�RD COMI'REHENSIVE PL�1N. �PPROVAL OR DIS�IPPROV�L OF THE REQL'EST BY THE HEARINGS OFFICER �Y�ILL BE B�SED UPON THESE CRITEWII AND THESE CRITERIA ONLY. AT THE HF�IRING IT IS IMPORT�NT THAT COMMENTS REL�ITING TO THE REQUEST PERTAIN SPECIFICALLY TO THE�PPLIC�BLE CRIT'ERI11 LIST'ED. FAILURE TO R�1ISE �N ISSUE IN PERSON OR BY LETTER r1T SOi�� POINT PRIOR TO THE CLOSE OF THE HE�IRING ON THE REQUEST �CCOMP�Nl�:ll BY STIITEMENTS OR EVIDENCE SUFFICIENT TO 11LLOW THE HF�IRINGS�1UTHORITY r1N OPPORTUNITY TO RESPOND TO THE ISSUE PRECLUDES r1N�PPF�1L TO THE I.�1ND USE B0�1RD OF APPF�IIS B�SED ON THAT ISSliE. ALL DOCUMENTS AND�1PPLICIIBLE CRITERLI IN TI3E 11BOV�-NO'I'ED rIL��R��Vr1IL�1BLE FOR INSPECTION AT NO COST OR COPIES Cr�N BE OBTAINED FOR 'TWENTY-FNE CENTS (25G) PER PAGE, OR THE CURRENT Rr1TE CHr1RGED FOR COPIES AT THE TIME OF THE REQUEST. �T LF�1ST SEVEN (7) Dr1YS PRIOR TO THE HF�IRING,�COPY OF THE ST�FF REPORT WILL BE AVAIL�BLE FOR INSPECTION�1T NO COST,OR�COPY CAN BE OBT�INED FOR'TWENTY-FIVE CENTS (25G) PER P�GE, OR THE CLRRENT R�1TE CH1IRGED FnR CnPIF,S AT THE TIME OF THE REQUEST. FOR FURTHER INFORI��.�ITION PLE.�SF. CONT�CT THE ST�FF PL�INNER EMILY ENG:1T(503) 639-4171,TIG�RD CIT'Y H�1LL, 13125 S��'I�:1I.I,BOL LE�'_�RD,TIG:IRD,OREGON 97223,OR BY E-i�L�II,TO Emi�(�a,ri�ard-or.gov. � � �� 1 I I � ,.,.... ., ....,. ... � �"l�:I�ITI�\I_�P s�� __________ � Ci_�P'_'�l�lb-�)�l�)l►; �-_3IL f u)G-(x)IlG9 �I.I.T.( H---- (�I-I_�RTER S(�H<=)(=)L � �-------- SITE :_�`x'. -: y' 1..,,: . , —'��,"r . l. � CANTERBURy LN ,`'�+•"' ' ,,,;i _ � .. _-'�r1:,,.t�: ., U � .--` �i� W W � N I�f 1 MURpOCK ST �'•� � � a � � � �� ...._. ��.o,_. � m LMONTE DR 'a�i».:�" .,........«.. un�ty ubprt.n�t ot e , , mep�cNM I A � � �� EXHIBIT� 2S110AD-00510 2S111BC-00200 BACKHAUS BRENDA BOGERT MARK H AND 10627 SW CANTERBURY LN MARY E TIGARD,OR 97224 14445 SW 100TH TIGARD,OR 97223 2 10AD-00500 2S11 OAD-01800 BAC U ENDA BROWN SCOTT C 106 NTERBURY LN 14630 SW 106TH AVE ARD,OR 24 TIGARD,OR 97224 2S111BC-03600 2S1118C-01400 BATES STEPHEN CHRISTOPHER AND BUEHLER GREGORY J&SARA L JODETTE SUGDEN 10145 SW VIEW TER 10430 SW VIEW TERRACE TIGARD,OR 97224 TIGARD,OR 97224 _ - -2S971BC-01000 2S970AD-0424D BAUMAN C WAYNE&MARY BUKRES MIWAKO 10270 SW VIEW TER 14615 SW 106TH AVE TIGARD,OR 97224 TIGARD,OR 97224 2S110AD-04204 2 10AD-04203 BEHRENDT ROBERT F AND SHARON A BU S AKO 1450 S KIHEI RO C205 146 106TH AVE KIHEI, HI 96753 •GARD,0 97224 110AD-04250 2S110AD-02810 B EN OBERT F AND SHARON A CAGLE THOMAS E 145 EI RD C205 PO BOX 26 EI, HI 9 53 TUALATIN,OR 97062 2S110AD-02300 2S110AD-02800 BENZ FRED S C TH AS E PO BOX 230029 PO B TIGARD, OR 97281 ALATIN,0 97062 110AD-02310 2S110AD-09400 BE CALWAY HILL HOMEOWNERS ASSOC PO 2 9 BY STAN ADKINS BUILDER INC ARD,OR 97281 8459 SW BARBUR BLVD PORTLAND,OR 97223 2S1116C-03600 2 OAD-09600 BERTULEIT MIRIAM R/DANIEL TRS CALW ILL HO WNERS AS50C 10390 SW VIEW TERRACE ST BY STAN A BUILDER INC TIGARD,OR 97224 8459 ARB BLVD P TLAND,OR 97 23 2S111 BC-02900 2 110AD-09500 BOEHR IRWIN I AND PATRICIA L CAL Y HILL H EOWNERS ASSOC TRUSTEES BY STA S BUILDER INC 10470 SW VIEW TERRACE 8459 BA UR BLVD TIGARD, OR 97224 RTLAND,OR 97223 2 110AD-01200 2S110AD-00300 CA AY HILL HO EOWNERS ASSOC DIXON CANDICE M BY ST A S BUILDER INC 10631 SW CANTERBURY LN 8459 BUR BLVD TIGARD,OR 97224 TLAND, O 97223 2S 110AA-01500 2 10AD-0031 D CANTERBURY PLACE LLC DIX C CE M 109 E 13TH ST 1063 ANTERBURY LN VANCOUVER,WA 98660 ARD,OR 7224 2S111BC-046D0 2S110AD-02100 COOPER THEODORE P& DREYER JOAN C SHELLEY R 14678 SW 106TH AVE 10198 SW INEZ ST TIGARD,OR 97224 TIGARD,OR 97224 ---2S7116C-025D3 2 10AD-02110 _ CORLISS JAMES UCORA K DRE J C 9750 SW INEZ 1467 6TH AVE TIGARD,OR 97224 ARD,OR 7224 2S110AD-02000 2S1116C-03001 CRIST DAVID L 8 BARBARA A DUNKLEE JOHN 8 MARGARET 14672 SW 106TH AVE 10440 SW VIEW TERR TIGARD,OR 97223 TIGARD,OR 97224 2 110AD-02010 2S7716B-02400 CR DAVID &BARBARA A DURFEE DAVID A 8 SHIRLY M 14672 6TH AVE 10460 SW AMANDA CT RD,OR 7223 TIGARD,OR 97224 2S7118C-02401 2S111B6-01200 CROSS ROGER K III&CLARE E FABER ROBERT C 8 MARGARET A 10155 SW MURDOCK ST 14230 SW 103RD TIGARD,OR 97224 TIGARD,OR 97224 2S110AD-00200 2S1118C-03700 DANCESCU CHRISTIAN FAIRLEY RONALD S&KAREN S 10633 SW CANTERBURY LN 10420 SW VIEW TERRACE TIGARD,OR 97224 TIGARD,OR 97224 2 110AD-00210 2S711 BC-02300 DA SCU RISTIAN FANTZ GARY E AND GAY 1063 NTERBURY LN 14530 SW 103RD AVE T RD,OR 24 TIGARD,OR 97223 2S1716C-03500 2S110AD-08600 DAVIS EDWARD&SUSAN LYNN FISHER ELEANOR 10445 SW VIEW TER 10505 SW CANTERBURY LN TIGARD,OR 97224 TIGARD,OR 97224 2S1118C-04500 2S111BC-04700 FRISWOLD JAMES E&DIANA J HEYWORTH SEAN A&MEGAN E 14700 SW 103RD AVE 6333 SW GARDEN HOME RD TIGARD,OR 97224 PORTLAND,OR 97219 25111 BC-02500 2S110AD-00910 GAUCH PATRICIA 8 HOYT JOYCE MITCHELL MICHAEL W 10619 SW CANTERBURY LN 10205 SW MURDOCK ST TIGARD,OR 97224 TIGARD,OR 97224 2S111BC-02504 2S110AD-00900 GA H PATRIC 8 YT JOY MITCH HAEL W 106 CANTERBURY LN 10205 DOCK 5T AR , R 97224 TI RD,OR 9 24 2SL10AD-04100 2S1 iDAD-04000 GALYEN SUSAN E HRICSINA-DOWNEY KATHERINE A 14641 SW 106TH AVE 14647 SW 106TH AVE TIGARD,OR 97224 TIGARD,OR 97224 2S111 BC-03400 2S110AD-00810 GOSSELIN WILLIAM C AND JJ RENTALS LLC BETTY JEAN 14803 SW 106TH AVE 10405 SW VIEW TERR. TIGARD,OR 97224 TIGARD,OR 97223 2S1116C-04600 110AD-00800 GOTTER SAMUEL A 8�VICTORIA L JJ NTA LC 10125 SW MURDOCK ST 1480 106TH AVE TIGARD, OR 97224 ARD,0 7224 2S110AD-01900 2S111BC-03300 HAASE JOHN G JOHNSON DOUGLAS EDWARD AND 14666 SW 106TH AVE SUE ANN TIGARD,OR 97224 10375 SW VIEW TERRACE TIGARD,OR 97223 2S110AD-01910 2S711BB-00900 H E J G KASTEL CHARLES G&MARY J TRS 146 106TH AVE 14259 SW 100TH T ARD, O 7224 TIGARD,OR 97224 2S110AD-01500 2 116B-01100 HADLEY MICHAEL F KA L C LES G&MARY J TRS 10540 SW CANTERBURY LN 1425 OOTH TIGARD,OR 97224 ARD,0 7224 2S171B6-018a0 2S11DAD-01700 HEISE MONICA JO-ANN KLABO LISA M 10390 SW AMANDA CT 14620 SW 106TH AVE TIGARD, OR 97224 TIGARD,OR 97224 2S111 BB-02200 2S110AD-01600 KLETZEL E SCOT 8 KRISTI S MCGUIRE STEPHEN 10479 SW AMANDA CT 10550 SW CANTERBURY LN TIGARD,OR 97224 TIGARD,OR 97224 2S111BC-0080U 2S110AD-03200 KNIGHT W A MCNALLY BELINDA C 10175 SW INEZ ST 10627 SW MURDOCK ST TIGARD,OR 97224 TIGARD,OR 97224 2S111BC-02100 2S1118C-04000 LITTLETON DAVID A AND WANDA J MILLER JUDITH A 8 PAUL E TRS 10090 SW INEZ 10330 5W VIEW TER TIGARD,OR 97224 TIGARD,OR 97224 _ -- 2S111BC-03200 2S111BC-02700 LUKE-DORF INC MILLER PAUL E 8 JUDITH A 10313 SW 69TH AVE 10380 SW CANTERBURY TIGARD,OR 97223 TIGARD,OR 97224 2S110AD-02710 2S111B6-02500 LYNCH DORIS M MONTES GLORIA I&CARLOS A 10579 SW MURDOCK ST 10440 SW AMANDA CT TIGARD,OR 97224 TIGARD,OR 97223 2S 10AD-02700 2S1118C-01500 LY DO M MUDROW MICHAEL T 8�DIANE C 10579 MURDOCK ST 10185 SW VIEW TERR T RD,O 97224 TIGARD,OR 97224 2S110AD-03100 2S110AD-02410 MARSH BONNIE S NEVAN NICOL 10621 SW MURDOCK 5T 10561 SW MURDOCK ST TIGARD,OR 97224 TIGARD,OR 97224 2S111 BC-00700 2 10AD-02400 MCBRIDE GLEN W& NE NI L JANET HALL 1056 URDOCK ST 10135 SW INEZ T ARD,O 97224 TIGARD,OR 97224 25110AD-00700 2S111BC-02302 MCELHANEY JONATHAN D NOKES DESTON S 10623 SW CANTERBURY LN 15532 SW PACIFIC HWY TIGARD,OR 97224 STE C-1B#22 TIGARD,OR 97224 110AD-00710 251118C-02303 M HAN ONATHAN D NOKES KATHY EVELYN 10623 CANTERBURY LN PO BOX 230231 RD, 97224 TIGARD,OR 97281 2S110AD-04230 2S110AD-02510 O'HAGAN JEANNINE REDELL JULIE L 14625 SW 106TH AVE 10567 SW MURDOCK ST TIGARD,OR 97224 TIGARD,OR 97224 110AD-0420 2 10AD-02500 O' A ANNINE RE J L 1462 106TH AVE 10567 URDOCK ST ARD,O 97224 T RD,OR 7224 2S110AD-03300 2S111B8-01000 OTTERSON JACK W&ESTHER M REEDER MARY R 38177 S DESERT STAR DR 14300 SW 103RD AVE TUCSON,AZ 85739 TIGARD,OR 97223 2S1i1BC-00600 2S111 BB-02600 PARTINGTON BRIGITTE ROCHE RICHARD L 8 KELLY J LIVING TRUST 10420 SW AMANDA CT BY B PARTINGTON TRUSTEE TIGARD,OR 97224 10085 5W INEZ ST TIGARD,OR 97224 2S1116C-01100 251116C-01200 PHILLIPS LOIS JEAN SEARS ALLEN C 20290 SW COMANCHE TER Go WILLIAMS GRANT 8 LANA TUALATIN,OR 97062 10190 SW VIEW TER TIGARD,OR 97224 2S110AD-01000 2S110AD-01100 POWELL JACQUELINE S SHIBLEY KENT D&RUTH K P O BOX 23322 10615 SW CANTERBURY LN TIGARD,OR 97281 TIGARD,OR 97224 110AD-0101 2 10AD-D1110 PO LL CQUELINE S SHI Y T D 8 RUTH K P O 3322 1061 ANTERBURY LN T ARD,O 97281 ARD,OR 7224 2S111BC-02800 2S111B8-02300 PRESBYTERY OF PORTLAND THE SPRAGUE DEREK G&KORINDA E CALVIN PRESBYTERIAN CHURCH 10480 SW AMANDA CT 10445 SW CANTERBURY LN TIGARD,OR 97224 TIGARD, OR 97224 2S1116C-00900 2S111BC-01700 PRESBYTERY OF THE CASCADES STACK RICHARD W JUDITH C BY CALVIN PRESBYTERIAN CHURCH 10265 SW VIEW TERR 10445 SW CANTERBURY LN TIGARD,OR 97224 TIGARD,OR 97224 251116C-039D0 2S110AD-02600 RAUDY BEVERLY STANLEY CHERIE 10360 SW VIEW TERRACE 10573 SW MURDOCK TIGARD,OR 97224 TIGARD,OR 97224 110AD-02610 2S110AD-04220 STA E HERIE TUCKER NOEL EDWARD 1057 MURDOCK 14635 SW 106TH AVE T ARD,OR 97224 TIGARD,OR 97224 2S110AD-00110 110AD-0420 STRATTON CHARLA MARIE T E EL EDWARD 10635 SW CANTERBURY LN 146 106TH AVE TIGARD,OR 97224 ARD, 97224 2S110AD-00100 2S110AD-02210 ST O ARLA MARIE UHLER ANN S& 1063 ANTERBURY LN COATES LAURA C ARD,OR 7224 14684 SW 106TH AVE TIGARD,OR 97224 _ _-2S110AD-037DD 110AD-02200 _ STRICKLER JAMES P& U ANN TINA R COATE RA C 14677 SW 106TH AVE 146 W TH AVE TIGARD,OR 97223 ARD,OR 97224 25110AD-03600 2S7116C-01300 TAYLOR CHARLES C II&AVA C UM EUNKYU C 8�KWANG Y 14685 SW 106TH AVE 10150 SW VIEW TER TIGARD,OR 97224 TIGARD,OR 97224 2S 110AD-08801 OAD-08690 TIGARD COLONY LIMITED PARTNERSHI UNK WNER 380 UNION ST STE 300 WEST SPRINGFIELD,MA 1089 2 110AD-08700 2S110AD-03900 TI D C Y LIMITED PARTNERSHI WEBBER MICHAEL D 380 U 5T STE 300 9612 171ST AVE SE T SPRI IELD,MA 1089 SNOHOMISH,WA 98290 2 110AD-08701 2S110AD-03800 TI D CO Y LIMITED PARTNERSHI WENSTRAND ROBERT G 380 U ST STE 300 14661 SW 106TH AVE T SPRI IELD, MA 1089 TIGARD,OR 97224 25111 BC-02600 2S117 BC-04400 TIGARD WATER DISTRICT WILDER RANDY A 8 JANETTE L 8777 SW BURNHAM ST COCHRAN BOYD C&WANDA J PO BOX 2300D WESTENHAVER DANA L 8 MARY LYN T TIGARD,OR 97223 14563 SW 100TH AVE TIGARD,OR 97224 2S1176C-Q3100 2S1176C-04300 TIMMINS KELLY A&KATHLEEN M WILDER RANDY A/JANETTE L 14335 SW 103RD AVE 14541 SW 100TH AVE TIGARD,OR 97224 TIGARD,OR 97224 � • . 2S110AD-00400 WILLEMS ATHENA 10629 SW CENTERBURY LN TIGARD,OR 97224 251 AD-00410 WILLE AT 10629 TERBURY LN T RD,OR 97 4 2S110AD-00610 WILLIAMS TERRY T 10625 SW CANTERBURY LN TIGARD,OR 97224 2 10AD-U0600 WILL S T Y T 1062 NTERBURY LN ARD,OR 9 24 2S111 BC-01600 YOUR ESTATE PO BOX 738 VANCOUVER,WA 98666 + • � f Josh Thomas Gretchen Buehner 10395 SW Bonanza 13249 SW 136th Place Tigard, OR 97224 Tigard, OR 97224 Kristen Miller 8940 SW Edgewood Street Tigard, OR 97223 Paul Owen 10335 SW Highland Drive Tigard, OR 97224 Tim Esau PO Box 230695 Tigard, OR 97281 CPO 46 16200 SW Pacific Highway, Suite H242 Tigard, OR 97224 Ross Sundberg 16382 SW 104th Avenue Tigard, OR 97224 Brian Wegener 9830 SW Kimberly Drive Tigard, OR 97224 Joseph Dyar 10285 SW Highland Drive Tigard, OR 97224-4668 Rex Caffall 13205 SW Village Glenn Tigard, OR 97223 John Frewing 7110 SW Lola Lane Tigard, OR 97223 CITY OF TIGARD - SoUTH INTERESTED PARTIES fnv. I of I1 li:lcuroln\setuollabelslClT South.docl UPDATED: 12-Mav-05 M.I.T.GH. Charter School C�2006-00002/VAR2006-00069 PO Box 230575 M.I.T.C.H. CHARTER SCHOOL Tigard, OR 97223 Ed Murphy Parati- LDC Design Group 20085 NW Tanasborne Drive I�'illsboro, OR 97124 Presbytery of Portland, The Calvin Presbyterian Church 10445 SW CanterburyLane Tigard, OR 97224 .. .�,_ . r!;-� �e... .__ "�.� . ... , ... . . ...__.._.. . ._... . ... � �"' � p� s �- ; I . � �_ � �e:-e --- a¢-.q. -� �d(1 i �� l -�i - • Ol L1�7�!'d ' ?' � [7��f�id�21c� .,. .� N�'7d___ �Lf� �in� -' -- '- -- � ��. fP1 }"I�- O� .�IYi"1 J�Zh4?J�1NVrJ '71 'S �, ... �•1+VM7nreiC� . 9 L'CIA'�(- -�:{+MM�TlL�G. � 91'�LLalffi . N�� -T - � �. s - -� - �/ . . ..r - -.-,- I T �irt�l�x�_._�. / .T __ - .,q-41.. R �"'� �i �lnfYd9 iL � � .1�61--_ IPy �' f 1 , (0 �� c`�me�n5 9'urHn�� . 1. I Q >N ° 41719�"u(.Fd 7 � - �T � i � ' I a �� `l��f+Y1�M � � T � Q N(D h7.r+w�b� �., -)__a_. �, . _—_� T. . _ 7 . . � � �� 9��a ��..s.,� r — _ � 1� � "' i cQ � - .� o E� s I �� - ;�A�\ T��-�� —= T '� 8. � � on �• , �- �/i_ � �\ �� i �+ , ,P � C � �� // � t ' �y � r r.�� n L. 4aai ��i,� � \\� �� ` ��\ 4 " � W i `� � ? c � wayad ouu.) t � .' -'-»»w\ Y -r�r.�,.. --1. _.-�-^" � �� w,eni ' �\\ v �1 _ i a�Z oe+�o-.�w w,n,v.� ��•� \� � �� ,� ' °'�n'"� , w p i h,.r,n�ru.a�v A �. �"" � � � Q � T \ \�\,._ . /� �" k � :�y� -.-__savoq' ' , � � ; �__ '%�� w� �� . o�assv. 'eoq: � �++T. q;� � �_ � ��m ,� � . --j`_l� � — %/� ,.�°`°"''° � �� , zo a q„ y,�.a� .� .1 '�� _ L - i�wwtiv. .2` rn,amrui l� �� _�� g �w� �Q �'-�y.�LV"�d/� T� �y II _ �I'li II. } 1-�'+rW ?N � . -I . e Wf�N"�i1Gi�r� 'iM ' i 9 . ' I.. I II I I I ��y � j / � �� ;� 1 IL -:- �AeN'Zi. �� .�. �" fii��.�� II . .� � �� W�M'I. �a IOGY.tIRM —�r� 1 1 /_'�" li II;IIIIIIIIIIII i . p'T+wqac - �` ..�� e c = i =- - .�xtY. I �I I�Ij�I�I��illq i .- r , �c.i � .0 �-�� - �� M�- II -�.,Illilll'�'i �+l+�iw�� p t � i i I � �� i __ -t _��- �_�- ' - I♦ ,y� � � .+t _ \.- __ . o - - - �� e ' • � ��- . ��J aM�aeau qN.+r -4ra'-r. �+I o�se.o � .� • I • �?�9'!�l!. � 9►J�+O� 1NCf� Oari} 1°a2=]00"'8� /,., . �. .�LL4�N/" -IMJiH ld W �X'�U.QiYy �CClwl � d✓d. �r`lwianVir'[T e'r'Y�iN' \�NW9'ry1V) 1�4�YAM17 'N�T4�'!v/� �� fAL[Y�IM��- i ' . I � • . -.hV1M^b'&'riltn �� +u�� ----o�-- �— � --� ---�— Q�4--�"� —� _ ��a,._�-----oecro. u -- i .� � � W�LLiatlV Mn O-�p^ , ' I i � . '�a - .�U�S - - _ - - -- — -- o . • - . � � � f—' W �_ � — r,eocan��ic ireFORn+nnur� svsieM �°� ° ' ° VIQNI'1�Y MAP -� , _ �-' � _ _______=__ � � CLJP2006-00002 � VAR.2006-00069 � M.I.T.C.H. - CHARTER D SC�IOOL < m m �"9�,� V�EW TERR — F� �G ��/�. . .. , . _ .., . . _ � � I SFERF r' � SITE - 0.° � � INEZ ST 5,,;a �__� - ;� �_ I � ,� � _ �,,� - � • �E CANTERBURY LN _�eUL��*�o � " ` _ -�� °n �'eonRn. o � � 1 1 � i.f I I-1 i i�'� I I ��r� �r�nno:�!'� ua,.-n,. �IR� �— � �� I . w � � � —- Tigard Area Map � ' `_ ---. _ ___1 ; Q _ __� � � ��-� � � N ]m, , i , ; 1 , --� �--� � f1� � MURDOCK ST o ,00 Zoo 300 400 Feet _ MURDOCK _, . _ . ... . � — 1"=311�ee� � ' • _ w .� I - _ ';I Q I � _ ~ i Q ' ' . � ,-. = I ///�//� � ._. . _ ~ _ _ , � I.L� Iniormation on this map is fa general bcation onty and j � � I i should be verified with IAe Devebpment Servites Divisan. � , �/�/%!/!?� ,f\, ��u/ `. . O Q — 13125 SW Hall Blvd .. Q Tgard,OR 97223 ! - DELMONTE DR � I «03'63�°," , . . . . . . . � � M nnp:�n«ww.�L6gard.a.�s Community Development Plot date:Jul 27,2006;C:ImagiclMAGIC03.APR � M.I.T.C.H. Chaner School C�2006-00002/VAR2006-00069 PO Box 230575 M.I.T.C.H. CHARTER SCHOOL Tigard, OR 97223 Ed Murphy Parati- LDC Design Group 20085 NW Tanasborne Drive I�'illsboro,OR 97124 Presbytery of Portland, The Calvin Presbyterian Church 10445 SW CanterburyLane Tigard, OR 97224 , �� AFFIDAVIT OF MAILING - I,Patricia L. Lunsford,being first du�ly sworn/affirni,on oath depose and saythat I am a Senior Administrative Specialist for the City of Tigard,Waslungton C�ounty,Oregon and that I served the following: �Qrck e1pFm�pr�e IS�x(s)Rebw�} ❑x NOTTC� OF FINAL ORDER FOR C[JI'2006-00002/VAR2006-00069- MITCH C�-IARTER SCHOOL (File No./I�Fame Relere�ce) � AMENDEDNOTICE HEARING BODY: HEARING DATE: ❑ City of Tigar•d Plaruiing Director � T"igard Hearings Officer (8/21/2006) ❑ Tigard Plannuig Comtnission ❑ Tigard City Council A copyof the said notice being hereto attached,marked Exhibit"A",and byreference made a part hereof,was mailed to each nazned person(s) at the address(s) shown on the attached list(s),marked Eachibit"B",and by reference made a part hereof,on Au�ast 24,2006,and deposited in the United States Mail on August 24,2006,postage prepaid. _ - j ,; �7� erson that Pre o � e) STATE OF OREGON County of Washington ss. City of Tigard Subscribed and sworn/affirmed before me on the �2� dayof ��-� �� ,2006. — OF�ii;�hL�b�;: K�i;::31E:J H'E�1R�_�. '. �fL�yr� Nor,�RV r��fl�ic-�;��- NO ARY PUBLI OF OREGON � � c��Mi�siura r�o.;�.�. n�YCOMrniS�.�oNFxGE�?,_s±��i • __-_�----- .-- .-- - - -- - ---- My Conuni.ssion Expires: �. �� EXHIBIT�4 120 DAYS = 12/12/2006 DATE OF FILINC�: 8/23/2006 �� - - CITY OF TIGARD � � , Washington Counry, Oregon NOTICE OF FINAL ORDER BY THE HEARINGS OFFICER Case Numbers: CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT CUP 2006-00002 AD USTMENT VAR 2006-00069 Case Name: MITCH CHARTER SCHOOL Applicant's Name/Address: MITC�i Charter School PO Box 230575 T OR 97223 Owner's Name/Address: Calvin Presb erian Chu�h 10445 SW Canterb Lane T' OR 97224 Address of Property: 10445 SW Canterb Lane 'I' ard R 97224 Tax Ma /Lot Nos.: Was ' on Co.Tax Assessor's Ma No.2S111BC,Tax Lot 02800 A FINAL ORDER INGORPORATTNG T�IE FACI'S, FINDINGS AND OONQ.LJSIONS APPROVING A REQUEST FOR A CONDITIONAL U5E AND ADJUSTMENT. THE QTY OF TTGARD HEARINGS OFFIC�R ��E Tf-� PLANNING DIVISSIONS STAFF PRE ORT Al�ID RE��NDATTONS OR TI-�G AGENQES, APPLICATTON DESCRIBED IN FURTI�R DETAIL IN Tf-� STAFF REPORT. 'I� HEARINGS OFFIC�R HELD A PUBLIC HEARING ON AUGUST 21, 2006 TO REC�IVE TESTIMONY REGARDING THIS APPLICATION. Tf�S DEQSION HAS BEEN BASED ON 'IT� FACTS, FINDINGS AND OONQ.LlSIONS CON'I'AINED WITHIN T�IIS FINAL ORDER Reques� ➢ Conditional Use Pemut approval to allow the M.I.T.GI-L Charter School to occupy classroom space in the Calvin Presbyterian Church. M.I.T.G�L is K-7 and will have up to 160 students. The school will lease the lower level of the church, wiuch has 8 classrooms and a commons area. The school will aLso have access to a fenced playground on site. The applicant does not propose any changes to the church exterior or site. In addition, the applicant requests an adjustment to the bicy�le parlflng standard to reduce the required number of bicycle parking spaces from 48 to 6. At the close of the record on August 21, 2006, the Hearings Officer conditionally approved the request, subject to the conditions of approval within this fmal order. Zone: R 3.5: Low Density Residential District. A��licable Review Criteria: Communiry Development Code Chapters 18330, 18.360, 18.390, 18.510, 18.705, 18.725, 18.745, 18.755, 18.765, 18.780, 18.790,18.795 and 18.810. Action: ➢ ❑ Approval as Requested x❑ Approval with Conditions ❑ Denial Notice: Notice was published in the newspaper and mailed to: ❑X Owners of Record within the Required Distance ❑x Affected Governinent Agencies ❑X Interested Parties 0 The Applicants and Owne� The adopted findings of fact and decision can be obtained from the Planning Division/CommunityDevelopment Department at the City of Tigard City Hall. Final Decision: THIS DECISION IS FINAL ON AUGUST 24,2006 AND BECOMES EFFECTIVE ON SEPTEMBER 9, 2006 UNLESS AN APPEAL IS FILED. AppeaL• The decision of the Review Authoriry is final for pur�oses of appeal on the date that it is mailed. Any party with standing as provided in Section 18.390.040.G.1. may a�peal th�s decision ui accordance with Section 18.390.040.G.2. of the Tigard CommunitY Develo ment Code which provides that a written appeal together with the required fee shall be filed with the Director withui ten�10) business days of the date the notice of the decision was mailed. ,The appeal fee schedule and forms are available from the Planning Division of Tigard City Hall, 13125 SW Hall Boulevard,'I"igard,Oregon 97223. THE DEADLINE FOR FILING AN APPEAL IS 5:00 PM ON SEPTEMBER 8,2006. Questions: If ynu have any questions,please call the City of Tigard Planning Division at(503) 639-4171. BEFORE THE LAND USE HEARINGS OFFICER FOR THE CITY OF TIGARD, OREGON Regarding an application by MITCH Charter School ) F I N A L O R D E R for a conditional use permit and adjustment for a K-7 ) CUP2006-00002 charter school in a church at 10445 SW Canterbury ) VAR2006-00069 Lane in the R-3.5 zone in the City of Tigard, Oregon )(MITCH Charter School) A. SUMMARY 1. Debi Lorence filed the application for MITCH Charter School (the "applicant"). She requests approval of a conditional use pernut to operate a charter school for up to 160 students in kindergarten through 7�'grade. The school will be conducted in an existing building on the grounds of Calvin Presbyterian Church at 10445 SW Canterbury Lane, which occupies the northwest quadrant of the intersection of Canterbury Lane and 103`d Avenue (tax lot 2800, WCTM 2S111BC (the "site"). The site contains about 3.53 acres and is zoned R-3.5. The Staff Report to the Hearings Officer dated August 5, 2002 (the "Staff Report") contains a history of City review and development on the site, which the hearings officer incorporates as his own. The applicant does not propose to enlarge the building or to add parking or to undertake other significant development to accommodate the proposed charter school. The applicant requests approval of an adjustment to the minimum bicycle parking space standard to reduce the number of spaces required from 48 to 6. 2. Tigard Hearings Officer Joe Turner(the "hearings officer")conducted a duly noticed public hearing to receive testimony and evidence in the matter. At the public hearing, City staff recommended conditional approval of the application. Representatives of the applicant and the church testified in support of the application. Other than service providers, no one testified orally or in writing. The hearings officer closed the public record at the end of the hearing. There were no disputed issues in this case. 3. The hearings officer concludes that the applicant sustained the burden of proof for a conditional use permit and adjustment to the bicycle parking space standard, based on the findings and conclusions included and incorporated herein and subject to conditions at the end of this final order. B. HEARING AND RECORD 1. The hearings officer held a duly noticed public hearing on August 21, 2006 to receive and consider public testimony in this matter. The record includes a witness list, materials in the casefile as of the close of the record, including materials submitted after the hearing, and an audio record of the hearing. At the beginning of the hearing, the hearings officer made the declaration required by ORS 197.763. The hearings officer disclaimed any ex parte contacts, bias or conflicts of interest. The following is a summary by the hearings officer of selected relevant testimony offered at the hearing. 2. City planner Emily Eng summarized the Staff Report. 3. Lee Weislogel appeared for the applicant and accepted the findings and recommended conditions in the Staff Report. He requested the hearings officer modify condition 2 to note that schools are partially exempt from the noise standards of the Tigard Municipal Code ("TMC"). The applicant does not intend to generate amplified noise on the site. He waived the applicant's right to submit a final argument. 4. City Planning Director Dick Bewersdorff noted that the noise exemption for schools does not apply to amplified sounds or noise in excess of 85 dB. S. Kay Smith testified on behalf of the Calvin Presbyterian Church, the property owner. She testified that the church supports the application and is looking forward to working with the applicant. 6. Debi Lawrence, the founder and director of the MITCH Charter School testified in support of the application. 7. At the end of the hearing, the hearings off`icer closed the public record and announced his intention to approve the application subject to recommended conditions in the Staff Report. C.DISCUSSION 1. The Staff Report identifies the applicable approval criteria for the application and applies them to the record in the case. The hearings officer agrees that the standards identified in the Staff Report are applicable and finds that they are correctly applied to the facts of the case in the Staff Report. Substantial evidence in the record shows that the proposed use does or can comply with the applicable approval criteria for a CUP, and adoption of recommended conditions of approval as amended will ensure final plans are submitted and implemented as approved consistent with those criteria and standards and will prevent, reduce or mitigate potential adverse impacts of the development consistent with the requirements of the CDC. The findings in the Staff Report also describe why the applicant adjustment to the bicycle parking standards requested by the applicant complies with applicable standards and why the adjustment is supported by substantial evidence in the record. The hearings officer adopts the findings and conclusions in the Staff Report as his own. 2. Proposed condition of approval2 in the Staff Report provides: The applicant is hereby notified that generating noise in excess of 50 dBA may result in complaints requiring alteration of activities. The applicant shall certify that the proposed use will not generate noise in excess of the standards specified in the Tigard Municipal Code, Chapter 7.40.160. CUP2006-D0002 and VAR2006-00069 Hearings O�cer Final Order (MITCH Charter School) Page 2 Section 7.40.160 of the Tigard Municipal Code "TMC")prohibits noise in excess of 50 dB at any time between seven a.m. and nine p.m. the same day.' However TMC 7.40.180.A provides an exemption for: Non-amplified sounds created by organized athletic or other group activities, when such activities are conducted on property generally used [as a] school... during normal hours for such events. The applicant proposed to operate a school on the site. Therefore activities on the site are subject to the exemption of TMC 7.40.180.A. However TMC7.40.190 prohibits noise in excess of 85 dB for more than 5 minutes in any calendar day, regardless of the exemptions. The examiner finds that condition of approval2 should be modified to reflect the noise regulations that apply to the proposed school. D. CONCLUSIONS Based on the findings and discussion provided or incorporated in this final order, the hearings officer concludes that the applicant sustained the burden of proof that the proposed conditional use permit and adjustment do or will comply with the applicable criteria of the Community Development Code, provided development that occurs after this decision complies with applicable local, state, and federal laws and with conditions of approval warranted to ensure such compliance occurs in fact. E. DECISION In recognition of the findings and conclusions contained herein, and incorporating the Staff Report and public testimony and exhibits received in this matter, the hearings officer hereby approves CUP2006-00002 and VAR2006-00069 (MITCH Charter School), subject to the following conditions of approval: CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL THE FOLLOWING CONDITIONS SHALL BE SATISFIED PRIOR TO ISSUANCE OF BUILDING PERMITS: Submit to the Current Planning Division (Emily Eng, (503) 718-2712) for review and approval: 1. The applicant shall provide a 6-stall bic�cle rack in addition to the existing onsite bicycle rack that is not within parking aisles, required landscaping or pedestrian ways. A revised plan will be required showing the location and specific design and location of the required bicycle rack in accordance with standards in Section 18.765.OSO.A through D of the code. 2. The ap�licant is hereby notified that activities on the site are subject to the noise limitations of Article IV of Section 7.40 of the Tigard Municipal Code. The applicant shall certify that the proposed use will not generate noise in excess of the standards specified in this section of the Tigard Municipal Code. 'The maximum noise level is reduced to 40 dB between nine p.m.and seven a.m.the following day. CUP2006-D0002 and VAR2006-00069 Hearings O�cer Fina1 Order (MITCH Charter School) Page 3 3. The applicant shall obtain a sign permit prior to erecting a si on the site. The subject sign shall comply with the sign code (Chapter 17.780� 4. Based on staff observation of the water quality facilities, staff suggests that the applicant work with the property owner to replant the water quality facilities and implement a maintenance plan to mitigate the impacts of not only additional vehicle trips, but current trips. Nate: This is a recommendation and not a condition of approval. THE FOLLOWING CONDITION SHALL BE SATISFIED PRInR TO ISSUANCE OF BUILDING PERMITS: Submit to the Building Department (Brian Blalock, (503) 718-2436) for review and approval: 5. The applicant is required to obtain a building permit for the change of use/occupancy. The applicant shall submit a revised interior floor plan that shows which rooms will be used as classrooms. THE FOLLOWING CONDITION SHALL BE SATISFIED PRIOR TO ISSUANCE OF BUILDING PERMITS: Submit to the Engineering Department (Bethany Stewart, (503) 718-2436) for review and approval: 6. Prior to issuance of a building permit, the applicant shall pay the addressing fee if using an address other than the existing address of the proposed site. THE FOLLOWING CONDITIONS SHALL BE SATISFIED PRIOR TO A FINAL BUILDING INSPECTION: Submit to the Engineering Department (Kim 1�1cNlillan, (503) 718-2642) for review and approval: 7. Prior to final building inspection, the applicant shall trim the trees and bushes specified in the Traffic Analysis report m order to improve sight distance. 8. Prior to final building inspection, the applicant's engineer shall submit final sight distance certification for the three access points. 9. Staff suggests that additional right-of-way be dedicated to the Public along the frontage of 103rd Avenue to increase the nght-of-way to 27 feet from the centerline. The description shall be tied to the existing right-of-way centerline. The dedication document shall be on City forms. Instructions are available from the Engineering Department. Note: This is recommendation and not a condition of approval. THIS APPROVAL MUST BE IMPLEMENTED WITHIN 18 MONTHS FROM THE EFFECTIVE DATE OF THIS DECISION. DATED this 23`d day of August 2006. Joe Turner, Esq., AICP City of Tigard Land Use Hearings Officer CUP2006-00002 and VAR2006-00069 Hearings O�cer Final Order (MITCH Charter School) Page 4 � � - . � GEOGPAPHIC INFOftMATION SYSTEM �•° VIQNI'I'Y MAP ��,� - _________= GLJP2006-00002 VAR2006-00069 M.I.T.C.H. CHARTER _ � - SGHOOL TE �G ,: � T F4 � - 5 < .� � �,f�l� _ �� CANTE B ' �z�,P :' ' Q � RA - - ,, �� • � ' gE[F BENO PO.. _l W r9a.a nree�eaa �— � ♦ � N m � 0 100 200 .l(Hl 400 Feel MURDOCK ST � ,-=.3�,�..,., .� � - � B B� 1 � � Inlortnatlon on Mv�map u ip general location only end � �e sAould be varified wilh the Development Services Division. 13125 SW Hall BNE � Tigard.OR 97223 (503)838-4171 Q7 DELMONTE DR ,,,,P:�n,�,.u.��a.a.� Community Development Plot date:Juf 27,2006;C:�magiclMAGIC03.APR I ,.F-�--- __..__..__._. --� --.._.._.___.,._._._ . . - --- _ .. _ _ �_ _._ _._._ _. , ., ..,.. ... _ _ _ - _.._ -- ..---- , - . _, — _.--��,. + ; � 1_____ �,�« ; . ��.d- a' . �—! i � � � ��. ; *�� ;� � � � � i �� . X '�'i ' ' I $ I � I, I ` ---�=--�--� F---�� f��i � , 1 , I �� 'ti =. -+�_ — � i . .. ; � a ` x:�\ —_— _- - � t :� ' �� ----- - �' � / —_— ' � �� ` � ��x��',� _ = i', i� � � � — �!:�, �~��,;�I — I �i� �� . � . ,. �� :�� t �� = - __ =- � h ; � . _ � � � . . �; rz�. - —_ � ° � . i�� _ � � �� ; � . _� � �r � I - F=F=.�—�� ' � L � ; `~ � �� . 2�1 �` � � � " ��y - . �.+I. � - �% � � �;� �� ! � . Ili :`t .��-. . i �l E I � ' �.,�� il��,� � �a T'- � �� ; I, I i � i' n —r � � : 1,It�lll��q�� '` ,i�i;��Ii Illl�i ! s?� „'`+a ��'` p ' � i �I,�'��II I I ' �iIP li�I fI �� , �V '� ;�4 p ^� �`. -1 r , Z \��~ I\; ?��j�'�yIl.��.,l��J�Ii�l� �;y` � �� y � �'�MI'! � I � ' � � \ \\ . � .:"� Y .'/F :Ll�`L� 1 �h.��MY � , � . � �` `� �� : / 4J , `�� ,�� '�4� * { ; a �� p• * ��' _ �� .H�" �,� ; ; � yp[f, € F"� � ''�!i�1��`� �; . {a � � '!`.. i�� t �4 d 4 yp�,a�p �{ . . � - ��l k �y i NMI�j� G .i � � . � �� _ i 1{a"�li�1Ji�� i . ` � � �� _ - _ , , _-- �. � _f_._ � . .. � :_ d Z . � � a j o ` 4 R �� e { p�� .r =�� i � ' � �" ��S � � °°-°' ►'-•• I q i��f -� `'�" � .. � L �'.� . � �' �, ��c - �I � � • t� �a � ; � � �� : � � �� . �� ' $ ��& . ' , . �� $ � ; � :;' � �a i ��= i D_ ' �� i � : . O I 0 S� � � I , � - �3 _ � �.u. �oa Y � � �� .�� ''�� >� � .� �� - � O1 . ,� ��,�,�/ Presbvterian Church �� f if ,�." `_ 10445 S.W. Canterbury Lane i °�,�� Tigard.Oregon A7224-4811 � .�y� on �' . � . � . ... . ` EXHIBIT� M.I.T.C.H. Charter School CUP2006-00002/VAR2006-00069 PO Box 230575 M.I.T.C.H. CHARTER SCHOOL Tigard, OR 97223 Ed Murphy Parati- LDC Design Group 20085 NW Tanasborne Drive Hlllsboro, OR 97124 Presbytery of Ponland, The Calvin Presbyterian Church 10445 SW CanterburyLane Tigard, OR 97224 Kay Smith 15436 SW Kenton Drive Tigard, OR 97224 "MITCH CHARTER SCHOOL" VIAJOR MODIFICATION TO AN EXISTING CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT TABLt; OF CON"1'liN`TS DEVELOPMENT APPLICATION FORM AND FEES APPLICANT'S STATEMENT EXHIBITS . �- 10132 .� . PRE,APP.HELD BY: CITY OF TIGARD PLANNING DIVISION � 13125 SW HALL BOULEVARD TIGARD - , OR 97223 8189 503.639.4171/503.684.7297 CITY OF TIGARD OREGON LAND USE PERMIT APPLICATION File# Other Case # Date By� Receipt# City ❑ Urb ❑ Date Complete TYPE OF PERMIT YOU ARE APPLYING FOR ❑AdjustmenWariance (I or II) ❑ Minor Land Partition (II) ❑ Zone Change {III) ❑ Comprehensive Plan Amendment (IV) ❑ Planned Development(III} ❑ Zone Change Annexation (IV) �Conditional Use (III) ❑ Sensitive Lands Review(I, II or III) ❑ Zone Ordinance Amendment (IV) ❑ Historic Overlay(II or III) ❑ Site Development Review (II) ❑ Home Occupation (II) ❑ Subdivision (II or III) ress i avai a e 1��y 5 Ca.v�+-e�-b�. r�.., �S j I I 8G ��SaC� . 3 . �-.�- 3�--� ,� -- 3. 5 . � C,�r�.r� sc.� oo � I�G� �. a . �� 30 5�5 � Q ►�f br� � ��-�� 5a3 . ��. (�I t� . �e�ca, ��-e.�c,.e+. � ac is i more an one Ca.l vi� r�sb �- �a.�, Cl�u�-r,G� . /o � � sv� �� ( � 7�� o �. �03 . 3a� 3 � `When the owner and the applicant are different people, the applicant must be �purchaser of record or a lessee ir possession with written authorization from the owner or an agent of the owner. The ners must sign this application in the space rovided on the back of this form or submit a written authorization with this application. ease e spea ic Q,'OY O I x% �` • C � ' n APPLICATIONS WILL NOT BE ACCEPTED WITHOUT ALL OF THE REQUIRED SUBMITTAL ELEMENTS A: DESCRIBED IN THE "BASIC SUBMITTAL REQUIREMENTS" INFORMATION SHEET. Pf2��PP.NELD BY: CITY 4F TIGARD PLANNING D.1VlS10N � '!3125•S1N'HALL BOU LEVARD TIGARD, OR 97223=8'i 89 503.639.41711503:684.7297 CITY QF TIGARD OREGON LAND �USE PERMIT APPLtCAT10N � � � File# 2J� .�:�`z- other case# P 2'�."Z.��- c�� Date ��1 �� By Receipt# ?'�� - 3� $� 'City � Urb�❑ Date Complete TYPE OF PERMIT YOU ARE APPLYlNG FOR ❑AdjustmentNariance (I or ll) ❑ Minor Land Partition (II} ❑Zone Change(lll) ' ❑ Comprehensive Plan Amendment{IV} ❑ Planned Development(111) ❑Zone Change Annexafion {iV) � ConditionaE Use (III) � ❑ Sensitive Lands Review(1, 11 or III} ❑Zone�rdinance Amendment (IV} ❑ Historic Overlay{il or lE!) ❑Site Development Review (Il} ❑ Home Occupation (I1) ❑Subdivision (i! or !li) " ress avai a e 10445 SW Canterbury Lane 2S1 116C 2800 • . acres R-3.5 ' � 7�P� . MITCH Charter School P.O. Box 230575, Tigard, Oregon 97223 503.936.6196 � Debi Lorence . � is � more an one Calvin Presbyterian Church 10445 SW Canterbury Lane, Tigard, Oregon 97224 503.639.3273 *When the owner and the applicant are different peopie, the applicant must be �purchaser of record or a lessee in possession with written authorization from ttte owner or an agent of the owner. The ners must sign this application in the space provided on the back of this form�or submit a written authorization with this application. ease spe c Major modification to an existing Conditional Use Permit for the Calvin Presbyterian Church, APPLICATIONS WELL NOT BE ACCEPTED WITHOUT AL� OF 7HE REQU[RED SUBMfTTAL ELEMENTS AS DE5CRIBED lt�THE "BASIC SUBMITTAL REQUIREMENTS" 1NFORMA7I�N SHEET. THE APPLICANT SHALL CERTIFY THAT: , � ♦ ff the application is granted, the applicant shal( exercise the rights granted in accordance with the terms and subject to ali the conditions and limitations of the approvai. - ♦ A11 tf�e above statements and the s#atements in the plot plan, attachments, and exhibits transmitted herewith, are true; and the applicants so acknowledge that any permit issued, based on this application, map be revoked if it is found that any such statements are false. � The appficant has read the entire contents of the application, inc[uding the palicies and criteria, and understands the requiremen#s fior approving or denying the application{s}. . SiGNATURES OF EACH OWI�ER OF THE SUBJECT PROPERTY ARE REQUIRED. r � - . . � . , � � . . . � . - � -/�-o � Owner's Signature Date � ` Owner's Signature Date '. � � ' • � Owner's Signature Date �wner's Signature Date . �wner's Signature Date ' � �/17/d 6 App(ic ntlAgen�/Re res nfative's Signature Date � � ' � � 7/� �/D� . . . �ApplicantlAgentlRepresentative's Sigt�afure Date � � • � i . � LAND USE PROP�SAL DE SCRIPTION 120 DAYS = FILE NOS.: CONDITI ONAL USE PE RMIT (CUP) 2006-00002 ADJUSTME NT (VAR) 2006-00069 FILE TITLE: M.I.T.C.H. CHARTER SCHOOL APPLICANT: M.I.T.C.H. Charter School OWNER Calvin Presbyterian Church PO Box 230575 10445 SW Canterbury Lane Tigard,OR 97223 Tigard,OR 97224 APPLICANT'S Ed Murph�y �p; Parati- LDC Design Group 20085 NW Tanasbourne ISrive I�'illsboro, OR 97124 REQUEST: The applicant is requesting Conditional Use Permit to allow the M.I.T.GH. Charter School to occupy classroom space uz the Calvin Presbyterian Church. M.I.T.C.I� is K-8 and has approxirnately 198 students. The school will lease the lower level of the church, which has 8 classrooms and a commons area. The school will a]$o have access to a fenced playground on site. The applicant does not propose any changes to the church exterior or site. In addition,the applicant requests an adjustment to the bicycle parkuig standard of 6 spaces per classroom. The applicant desires to reduce the requ.ired number of bicycle parking spaces from 48 to 6. LOCATION: 10445 SW CanterburyLane;Washington CounryTax Map 2S111BCh Tax Lot 2800. ZONE: R 3.5: Low DensityResidential District. The R 3.5 zoning district is designed to accommodate detached single-family homes with or without accessory residential units at a minimum lot size of 10,000 s quare feet. Duplexes are pernzitted conditionally. Some civic and institutional uses are also perniitted conditionally. APPLICABLE RE VIE W CRITERIA: Community Development Code Chapters: 18.330, 18.360, 18.390, 18.510, 18.705, 18.725, 18.745, 18.755, 18.765, 18.780, 18.790, 18.795,and 18.810. DECISION MAHING BODY BELOW: ❑ TYPE I ❑ TYPE II � TYPE III ❑ TYPE IV COMMENTS WERE SENT: JULY 28,2006 COMMENTS ARE DUE: AUGUST 11,2006 �HEARINGS OFFICER (MON.) DATE OF HEARING: AUGUST 21,2006 TTME: 7:00 PM [PLANNING COMMISSION (MON.) DATE OF HEARING: TTME: 7:00 PM [QTY COLJNQL (TLJES.) DATE OF HEARING: TTME: 7:30 PM [STAFF DEQSION TENTATIVE DATE OF DEQSION: COMPONENTS RELATED TO THE PROJECT AVAILABLE FOR VIEWING IN THE PLANNING DIVISION �VIQ1vITY MAP � WETLAND DEI.INEATTON ❑ EXISTTNG CONDITTONS �SITE PLAN ❑ TREE PLAN ❑ IMI'ACT STCTDY �NARRI�TTVE � GRADING PLAN ❑ STORM H20 ANALYSIS STAFF CONTACT: Emil�Eng,Assistant Planner (503) 639-4171,extension 2712 ��y ��, zoo6 L D C Cheryl Caines, Assistant Planner Design Group City of Tigard aPa�atirompony 13125 SW Hall Bivd. Tigard, Oregon 97223 RE: Conditional Use Permit for MITCH Charter School Dear Ms. Caines: Enclosed are three copies of an application for a Major Modification to an existing Conditional Use Permit for MITCH Charter School. The last Conditional Use application for the Calvin Presbyterian Church property was CUP 2000-00002. Separate from the application, we are submitting the following documents. ♦ A completed application form; �'`'- ��--''� :�`=1 1 ♦ A check for the filing fee in the amount of $4�n-�' ' • A title report; ♦ An affidavit of posting and mailing notices. At this time, not all of the materials are included in the application package. A neighborhood meeting is scheduled for July 27`h. A new Service Provider Letter from Clean Water Services is in process, as are letters from Pride Disposal and the Fire District's office. The traffic analysis and vision clearance evaluation are currently underway. My understanding is that the City will schedule this item for the August 21st hearing before the Hearings Officer, as long as we can get the rest of the materials in as soon as possible. Once you have reviewed the application, please let me know if you need anything else, besides the items noted above, to deem the application complete. Thank you, Cheryl. Since I 20085 NW Tanasbourne Drive Ed urphy H�iisbo�o,OR97124 Comprehensiv Planning Manager P503.858.4242 F 503.645.5500 E hillsboro@Idcdesign.com cc. Debi Lorence www.ldcdesign.com Project File # 10132 H��Sno��,�R Tlllamook,GR Vancouver,wn Bellevue,wt; Coeur d'Alene,iD Sacramento,Cn Clermont,F� www.pa raticompany.com L D C LETTER OF TRANSMI��E D DESIGN GROUP Date: 7/28/06 u,, ;% � ��, To: Emily Eng, Assistant Planner ,.„-., „rT�� Firm: City of Tigard PLANNINGIENGINEER!NG Address: 13125 SW Hall Blvd. (�DC) Job No.: 1361.001 Project Name: MITCH Charter School Agency No.: Plancheck No.: We are sending you: � Attached ❑ Under Separate Cover Copies Description 8 Complete Application Packet 2 Additional exhibits to be added to previously submitted packets 1 Sight distance letter w/ photos, for your use These are being transmitted as indicated below: ❑ As Requested ❑ For Your Use � For Approval ❑ Other � � 20065 NW TANASBOURNE ORIYE NILLSBORO OR 91124 PN 503. BSB. 4242 Signature: Robert SpurloCk F% 503. 645. SS00 WWW.LDCDESIGN.[OM Title: Assistant Planner (OAPOAAI[ 0��1(E CC. HIlLSB0R0, OREGON TIlLAM00K. OXEGOH YANCOUYER, WASHINGTON BEILEYUE, WASHINGTOH (OEUR D'ALENE, IDAHO ROCHIIN, CAUfOANIA CIERMONT, FLORIDA Emily Eng -CUP2006-00002 MITCH a�-'�cation Page 1� From: Emily Eng To: mitch@mitchcharterschool.org Date: 7/25/2006 9:57:48 AM Subject: CUP2006-00002 MITCH application Debi, This is confirming our phone discussions yesterday and today. We received the MITCH application last week with several components missing and I realize there may have been a misunderstanding that the City would process an incomplete application. My understanding was that we would receive a complete application. I spoke to Ed Murphy on Friday and understand MITCH is aiming for a hearing on August 21. However, with the traffic study not being complete for 3-4 weeks, staff would not have time to complete a staff report 7 days prior to the hearing date (August 11). Assuming the City receives all other pieces of the application, we can receive the traffic report no later than August 4. The City will schedule the hearing for August 21; however, if we can't produce a staff report for the Hearings Officer by August 11, we will have to cancel the hearing and renotice the public each time the hearing date is changed. Note: the public must be notified 20 days prior to the hearing date. In addition, MITCH would be charged for the cost of renoticing the public. Please understand that proceeding with missing information will compromise staff's ability to produce findings for the staff report. Components still missing are below. Item#1 is due ASAP so that we can process the adjustment. The other items are due with the traffic study no later than 8/4. 1) Fee for the adjustment to bicycle parking standards at 50% reduction-$132.50 2) Traffic Impact Study 3) Neighborhood meeting documentation 4) Endorsement from TVF&R Fire Marshall 5) Letter from Pride Disposal 6) CWS provider letter Sincerely, Emily ------------------------------------------------------------- Emily Eng Assistant Planner City of Tigard Community Development 13125 SW Hall Blvd. Tigard, OR 97223 www.ci.tigard.or.us T: (503) 718-2712 F: (501) 598-1960 CC: Ed Murphy; I.d.weislogel@comcast.net; xrueda@wbcable.net Emily Eng - RE: CUP2006-00002 MITCH application Page 1 From: "Ed Murphy" <MurphyE@paraticompany.com> To: "Emily Eng" <Emily@tigard-or.gov>, <mitch@mitchcharterschool.org>, "Debi Lorence" <d.lorence4@verizon.net> Date: 7/25/2006 12:25:57 PM Subject: RE: CUP2006-00002 MITCH application Thanks Emily. Attached is a copy of the letter from Pride Disposal. We expect the letter from CWS soon. I am sure that Debi will bring you a check for$132.50 right away. The traffic study is in process, and will most likely be done by the end of this week. (Howard Roll, our traffic engineer, has not had any success getting Kim to respond to voice mails or e-mails, but he will just proceed without her input. If necessary, he can make revisions next week after Kim reviews the report). The neighborhood meeting is scheduled for this coming Thursday night, so you we probably get the neighborhood meeting documentation on July 28th from Debi. The only thing we are a little stuck on is an "endorsemenY'from the Fire Marshall office. Debi tried to get their comments, without success. So far they have not responded to our voice mails or e-mails either. We sent him a copy of the site plan, highlighting the location of the two fire hydrants on site. We will keep trying, but if they never respond, we do not want our application held up because of it. I do not believe there will be any reason not to go ahead with a hearing on August 21 st. You should have all that you need to write the staff report in plenty of time. By the way, I do not think the City would actually cancel the meeting and re-notice in that case anyway. The normal procedure would be for the Hearings Officer to open the hearing, staff would recommend continuing the hearing -- if, for instance, we submitted the traffic report on August 8th or we never receive a response from CWS--and the Hearings Officer would grant the request and continue the hearing. That way, the City does not have to re-notice. But I do not see any problems in getting everything you need in to you by August 4th, so that should not even be an issue. How many additional copies of the application do you want us to submit? Thanks for your help. We really appreciate you expediting this application so MITCH can get the school opened on time. Ed Ed Murphy Comprehensive Planning Manager direct line: 503-352-1136 cell phone: 503-314-0677 --- - - — -- _ - f Emil Eng - [POSSIBLE SPAM] FW: CUP2006-00002 MITCH application Page 1 _ — _ � From: "Ed Murphy" <MurphyE@paraticompany.com> To: "Emily Eng" <Emily@tigard-or.gov> Date: 7/25/2006 12:29:43 PM Subject: [POSSIBLE_SPAM] FW: CUP2006-00002 MITCH application Whoops, spoke too soon. Kim responded to Howard today, and it looks like the traffic study will be submitted next week instead of the end of this week. I will keep pushing to get it done and submitted ASAP. Ed Ed Murphy Comprehensive Planning Manager direct line: 503-352-1136 cell phone: 503-314-0677 e-mail: murphye@Idcdesign.com ---------------------------------- LDC Design Group 20085 NW Tanasbourne Drive Hillsboro, Oregon 97124 t: 503.858.4242 f: 503.645.5500 e: hilisboro@Idcdesign.com w: www.ldcdesign.com OR: Hillsboro, Tiilamook � WA: Vancouver, Bellevue � ID: Coeur d'Alene � CA: Sacramento � FL: Clermont DISCLAIMER: This message is intended for the sole use of the individual to whom it is addressed, and may contain information that is privileged, confidential and exempt from disclosure under applicable law. If you are not the addressee you are hereby notified that you may not use, copy, disclose, or distribute to anyone the message or any information contained in the message. If you have received this message in error, please immediately advise the sender by reply email and delete this message. -----Original Message----- From: Howard Roll Sent: Tuesday, July 25, 2006 11:50 AM To: Kim Mcmillan Cc: Ed Murphy; 'Daniel' Subject: RE: CUP2006-00002 MITCH application Kim, 8/4 sounds much more workable. We will have our counts this Friday and can get you a full study by 8/4. Howard Roll, P.E. Senior Transportation Planner D 503.597.2903 M 503.320.5468 E hroll@ctsengineers.com -- -- Emily Eng - [POSSIBLE_SPAM] FW: C�1D2006-00002 MITCH application Page 2� CTS Engineers a Parati company 20085 NW Tanasbourne Drive Hillsboro, Oregon 97124 T 503.690-8080 F 503.645.5930 E cts@ctsengineers.com www.cts e n g i n ee rs.co m OR: Hillsboro, Tillamook � WA: Vancouver, Bellevue � ID: Coeur d'Alene � CA: Sacramento � FL: Clermont This message is intended for the sole use of the individual to whom it is addressed. It may contain information that is privileged, confidential or exempt from disclosure under applicable laws. If you are not the intended addressee you are hereby notified that you may not use, copy, disclose, or distribute to anyone this message or any information contained within this message. If you have received this message in error, please immediately advise the sender by replying to this email and delete this message. ' -----Original Message----- From: Kim Mcmillan [mailto:Kim@tigard-or.gov] Sent: Tuesday, July 25, 2006 10:41 AM To: Howard Roll Subject: Fwd: CUP2006-00002 MITCH application Howard, Here is the latest on the application process and timeline. Do you think you can meet the deadfine Emily has stated? Kim »> Emily Eng 07/25 9:57 AM »> Debi, This is confirming our phone discussions yesterday and today. We received the MITCH application last week with several components missing and I realize there may have been a misunderstanding that the City would process an incomplete application. My understanding was that we would receive a complete application. I spoke to Ed Murphy on Friday and understand MITCH is aiming for a hearing on August 21. However, with the traffic study not being complete for 3-4 weeks, staff would not have time to complete a staff report 7 days prior to the hearing date (August 11). Assuming the City receives all other pieces of the application, we can receive the traffic report no later than August 4. The City will schedule the hearing for August 21; however, if we can't produce a staff report for the Hearings Officer by August 11, we will have to Emily Eng - RE: CUP2006-00002 MITCH appiication Page 1 From: Emily Eng To: Ed Murphy Date: 7/25/2006 2:01:59 PM Subject: RE: CUP2006-00002 MITCH application Ed, Thank you for asking. We will need the following: -Eight copies of the application -$16 for 1 set of labels for public notice -One set of envelopes, labeled and with postage by Thursday, 7/27 (We are noticing on 7/28 to allow for the 2-week comment period). Patty has already printed out the labels and they are ready to be picked up. By the way, iYs the City's decision to cancel the hearing if we can't produce adequate findings because of an incomplete application. If we are unable to make findings and continue the hearing, the City will require the applicant to pay for the Hearings Officer's time. However, it seems like it won't be an issue. I just wanted the applicant to be aware of the worst case scenario. -Emily »> "Ed Murphy" <MurphyE@paraticompany.com> 07/25 12:25 PM »> Thanks Emily. Attached is a copy of the letter from Pride Disposal. We expect the letter from CWS soon. I am sure that Debi will bring you a check for$132.50 right away. The traffic study is in process, and will most likely be done by the end of this week. (Howard Roll, our traffic engineer, has not had any success getting Kim to respond to voice mails or e-mails, but he will just proceed without her input. If necessary, he can make revisions next week after Kim reviews the report). The neighborhood meeting is scheduled for this coming Thursday night, so you we probably get the neighborhood meeting documentation on July 28th from Debi. The only thing we are a little stuck on is an "endorsement"from the Fire Marshall office. Debi tried to get their comments, without success. So far they have not responded to our voice mails or e- mails either. We sent him a copy of the site plan, highlighting the location of the two fire hydrants on site. We will keep trying, but if they never respond, we do not want our application held up because of it. I do not believe there will be any reason not to go ahead with a hearing on August 21 st. You should have all that you need to write the staff report in plenty of time.By the way, I do not think the City would actually cancel the meeting and re-notice in that case anyway. The normal procedure would be for the Hearings Officer to open the hearing, staff would recommend continuing the hearing --if, for instance, we submitted the traffic report on August 8th or we never receive a response from CWS--and the Hearings Officer would grant the request and continue the hearing. That way, the City does not have to re-notice. But I do not see any problems in getting everything you need in to you by August 4th, so that should not even be an issue.How many additional copies of the application do you want us to submit?Thanks for your help. We really appreciate you expediting this application so MITCH can get the school opened on time.EdEd MurphyComprehensive Planning Managerdirect line: 503-352-1136ce11 phone: 503-314-0677e-mail: murphye@Idcdesign.com ----------------------------------LDC Design Group20085 NW Tanasbourne DriveHillsboro, Oregon 97124t: 503.858.4242f: 503.645.5500e: hillsboro@Idcdesign.comw: www.ldcdesign.com OR: Hillsboro, Tillamook � WA: Vancouver, Bellevue � ID: Coeur d'Alene � CA: Sacramento � FL: ClermontDISCLAIMER: This message is intended for the sole use of the individual to whom it is addressed, and may contain information that is privileged, confidential and exempt from disclosure under applicable law. If you are not the addressee you are hereby notified that you may not use, copy, disclose, or distribute to anyone the message or any information contained in the message. If you have received this message in error, please immediately advise the sender by reply email and delete this message. From: Emily Eng [mailto:Emily@tigard-or.gov] Sent: Tuesday, July 25, 2006 9:58 AM To: mitch@mitchcharterschool.org Emily Eng - RE: CUP2006-00002 MITCH application Page 2�; Cc: I.d.weislogel@comcast.net; Ed Murphy; xrueda@wbcable.net Subject: CUP2006-00002 MITCH application Debi, This is confirming our phone discussions yesterday and today. We received the MITCH application last week with several components missing and I realize there may have been a misunderstanding that the City would process an incomplete application. My understanding was that we would receive a complete application. I spoke to Ed Murphy on Friday and understand MITCH is aiming for a hearing on August 21. However, with the traffic study not being complete for 3-4 weeks, staff would not have time to complete a staff report 7 days prior to the hearing date (August 11). Assuming the City receives all other pieces of the application, we can receive the traffic report no later than August 4. The City will schedule the hearing for August 21; however, if we can't produce a staff report for the Hearings Officer by August 11, we will have to cancel the hearing and renotice the public each time the hearing date is changed. Note: the public must be notified 20 days prior to the hearing date. In addition, MITCH would be charged for the cost of renoticing the public. Please understand that proceeding with missing information will compromise staff s ability to produce findings for the staff report. Components still missing are below. Item#1 is due ASAP so that we can process the adjustment. The other items are due with the traffic study no later than 8/4. 1) Fee for the adjustment to bicycle parking standards at 50% reduction-$132.50 2) Traffic Impact Study 3) Neighborhood meeting documentation 4) Endorsement from NF&R Fire Marshall 5) Letter from Pride Disposal 6) CWS provider letter Sincerely, Emily ------------------------------------------------------------- Emily Eng Assistant Planner City of Tigard Community Development 13125 SW Hall Blvd. Tigard, OR 97223 www.ci.tigard.or.us T: (503) 718-2712 F: (501) 598-1960 �ECEIVED � � LDC APPLICANT'S STATEMENT ,, i� 1 7 2006 Design Group CI-I-Y OF TiGARD °°°�°�;�°�n�°°y fOr �LAN�JING!��JGIN�ERING " M i t c h C h a r t e r S c h o o / " REQU EST Major Modification to an Existing Conditional Use Permit for the Calvin Presbyterian Church APPLICANT Debi Lorence Mitch Charter School P.O. Box 230575 Tigard, Oregon 97223 OWNER Calvin Presbyterian Church 10445 SW Canterbury Lane Tigard, Oregon 97224 PREPARED BY Parati - LDC Design Group 20085 NW Tanasbourne Drive Hillsboro, Oregon 97124 LEGAL DESCRIPTION Tax Lot: 2800 Tax Map: 2S1 11 BC �o��Nw T��,�St��<<,t�o��,�e City of Tigard, Washington County, Oregon "'°Sb°`°,o�y"z4 P 503.858.4242 F 503.645.5500 ZO N I N G E hillsboro@Idcdesign.com www.ldcdesign.com R-3.5 sboro,oR �mook,oR .�.��.couver,WA ..;:��evue,WA Coeur d'Alene,ID Sacramento,cA Clermant,FL www.parat icom pany.com ,.�itch Charter School CUP Modif cation • ' ' • Project Name: Mitch Charter School Conditional Use Permit Property Description: Site is already fully developed as a church. Location: 10445 SW Canterbury Lane, at the corner of SW Canterbury Lane and SW 103�d Street Parcel Size: 3.53 acres Legal Description: 2S111BCO2800 Zoning: R-3.5 Applicant: Mitch Charter School, Debi Lorence Property Owner: Calvin Presbyterian Church Applicant's Representative: Ed Murphy, AICP LDC Design Group 20085 NW Tanasbourne Drive Hillsboro, Oregon 97124 10132/docslplan/application/7/17/06 1 MITCH Charter School CUP This page intentionally left blank 2 ]0132/docs/plan/application/7/17/06 Mitch Charter School CUP Modification MITCH Charter School intends to lease space in the lower level of Calvin Presbyterian Church for a school. The lower level of the church has eight classrooms and a commons area. The site has a fenced outdoor playground, an abundance of parking, and beautiful landscaping. MITCH's program is Kindergarten through 8th grade for 2006-2007. MITCH has only one class per grade, and expects to have a student population of 198 students. In addition, the school will have 12 teachers and 2 support staff working at the school. The site is already fully improved, and the site and the current use are very compatible with the school. MITCH students would enter through an entrance on the east side of the building that is completely separate from the main entrance into the church. Parking would be in the east parking lot, near the entrance to the school. This parking is completely separate from the parking lot used by church officials and congregants on the west side of the building. The use requires approval of a major modification to an existing Conditional Use Permit, which is the church, because the addition of a school is a change in use. However, MITCH is not proposing any changes to the building, the site, or the abutting streets. 10132/docs/plan/application/7/17/06 3 MITCH Charter School CUP This page intentionally left blank 4 10132/docs/plan/application/7/17/06 Mitch Charter School CUP Modification : � ' � � � � ' � History: MITCH Charter School has been located in various places in Tigard and Tualatin since it was founded in 2002. It is currently operating, on a temporary basis, out of portable modules at Tigard High School. The Calvin Presbyterian Church was built in 1965, and significantly expanded in 1992, 1994 and 2000. The church property is on tax lot 2S1116CO2800, a parcel at the corner of SW Canterbury Lane and SW 103�d Avenue. Please see Exhibit�1', Tax Assessor's Map. The site: The primary site is 3.53 acres in size. In addition, the church owns a parcel across SW 103�d Avenue, which it developed into a parking lot in 2002. The site does not have any wetlands or other sensitive lands on it or on any adjacent properties within 200' of the site. The site is sloped gently towards the east. Adjacent uses. The site is bordered by six single-family detached homes to the north, along SW View Terrace; a parking lot and single-family homes to the east; one house, the historic John Tigard House, and Tigard Water District property to the south; and multifamily development to the west. Please refer to Exhibit '2', Aerial Photograph. Descriptio» of Proposal. MITCH Charter School plans to operate a school in the Calvin Presbyterian Church, in the lower level of the addition constructed in 2000. They do not intend to make any improvements to the site or the building. They will be using classroom space that is already used for church-related classes. The proposed use is very similar to the existing uses already permitted under the approved Conditional Use Permits, except that it will operate throughout the week, and is not at all associated with the primary use of the building at all. The site is already fully improved. The existing site improvements include handicapped accessible parking near the door of the school, lighting, parking, landscaping, screening and buffering, storm water facilities, and pedestrian walkways. The adjacent streets are fully improved, including sidewalks and street trees. For photographs of the site, please refer to Exhibit '3', Site Photographs. For illustrations of the existing improvements, please refer to Exhibit `4', Architectural Elevation Drawings, and Exhibit 'S', Site Plans. These drawings show the building elevations and the site plan, including the landscaping, parking, and walkways. No changes to any of the existing utilities are necessary. The site is already served with adequate sewer, water and storm water lines. Please refer to the Exhibit `6', Civil Plan, for an illustration of the existing conditions, including right-of-way and street widths, ground elevations, public utilities, storm water quality facilities, and sidewalk location and widths. The school will use the lower floor classrooms and multi-use space constructed as part of the expansion in 2000. Please refer to Exhibit '7', Lower Floor Plan. Impact Ana/ysis. Chapter 18.390.040.B.2.e requires an impact study as part of the Type II procedure. For the most part, no improvements to the transportation, drainage, parks, water, and sewer systems are necessary to meet City standards or to minimize the impact of the development on the public at large, public facilities systems, and affected private property users. 10132/docs/plan/application/7/17/06 5 MITCH Charter School CUP Following are comments regarding the impact of the proposed development on public facilities and services. Transportation System: A Preliminary Sight Distance Certification letter is attached as Exhibit '8'. This letter verifies that the design of the driveways and streets are safe because they meet adequate sight distance standards. The traffic impact is minimal. The school hours are generally off-peak, and are different from the church hours. (The traffic analysis report is attached as Exhibit �13'.) DrainaQe System: The property slopes generally from the west to the east, towards SW 103�d Avenue. There are two existing water quality and detention facilities serving the site, both near SW 103�d Avenue. Parks System: No impact to the park system will occur because of this proposed site development. Water System: No significant impact to the water system will occur because of this proposed site development. No changes to the number or type of plumbing fixtures are planned. Sewer System: No significant impact to the sewer system will occur as a result of this proposed site development. Noise im�acts: The outdoor play area on the south side of the building will be used by the school, so there will be an increase in the number of children playing outside during the week. However, the playground is separated from the adjacent properties by an ZO'-wide access road, a 16 to 20-foot wide landscape strip with mature landscaping, and a 6'-high solid wood fence. In addition, the homes north of the outdoor play area have deep back yards with mature trees, which will reduce the noise impact. Liqhtinq: The existing lighting is primarily composed of lighting in the parking lots and around the perimeter of the building. There is a light near the front entry of the school. MITCH is not proposing any change to the existing lighting. Police, Fire and other Emergency Services: No impact to police, fire or other emergency services will occur as a result of this proposed site development. The playground is fenced on all sides, so children will not be running out into the access way or parking lot. If there were a need for emergency services, the school site is easily and quickly accessible from all directions. There will be a direct emergency vehicle access to the play area itself, through a gate, should the need ever arise. Prior Approvals and Reviews: The applicant attended a pre-application meeting with City staff on July 6, 2006. The pre-application conference notes are attached as Exhibit '9'. The church has applied for other major modifications of the Conditional Use Permit since it was built in 1965. It was significantly expanded in 1992, 1994, and 2000. (See CUP file #s 92-00001, 94-00004, and 2000-00002, respectively). The 2000 expansion included a 16,670 sq. ft. addition, for classrooms and a multipurpose room, which is the area the school will use. In 2002, it developed the property across 103�d Avenue for additional parking. The applicant will meet with the nearby property owners at a neighborhood meeting held on ]uly 27�h, 2006. Please see Exhibit '10' for documentation of the neighborhood meeting. 6 10132/docs/plan/application/7/17/06 ,�.rtch Charter Schoo!CUP Modification . . � � . . � Chapter 18.330 of the Tigard Development Code (hereinafter "Code") contains the standards and procedures under which a conditional use may be permitted. Section 18.330.030 contains the approval standards, which are as follows: 18.330.030 Approval Standards and Conditions of Approval A. Aoaroval Standards. The Hearings Officer shall approve, approve with conditions, or deny an application for a conditional use or to enlarge or alter a conditional use based on findings of fact with respect to each of the following criteria: 1. The site size and dimensions provide adequate area for the needs of the proposed use; 2. The impacts of the proposed use of the site can be accommodated considering size, shape, location, topography, and natural features; 3. All required public facilities have adequate capacity to serve the proposal; 4. The applicable requirements of the zoning district are met except as modified by this chapter; 5. The applicable requirements of 18.330.050; and 6. The supplementary requirements set forth in other chapters of this code including but not limited to Chapter 18.780, Signs, and Chapter 18.360, Site Development Review, if applicable, are met. RESPONSE TO CRITERIA i. The site size and dimensions provide adequate area for the needs of the proposed use; The site is already fully developed with a large church building, parking (including accessible parking), landscaping, lighting, fire hydrants and storm drainage facilities. The location, access, site size, existing building space and existing parking areas are a very good match for the school. Please see Exhibit '2' for an aerial photograph of the site and Exhibit '3' for photographs of the existing conditions of the site. 2. The impacts of the proposed use of the site can be accommodated considering size, shape, location, topography, and natural features. There will be little, if any, negative impacts resulting from the proposed use on this site. The size, shape, location, topography and natural features of the site are perfect for the school. There is really no significant additional impact to the public facilities and transportation systems. Because this is a secondary use within a previously developed site, the impacts are minor. The existing trees and shrubs in the wide landscape strip along the north edge of the property will buffer and screen the adjoining properties from the impacts of children playing on the outdoor playground equipment. Of course, this activity will only take place during recesses. Otherwise, all the activities will be conducted inside of the church building. 10132/docs/plan/application/7/17/06 7 MITCH Charter Schoo!CUP The existing on-site lighting does not negatively impact the neighboring properties. 3. All required public facilities have adequate capacity to serve the proposal. The site is already fully developed. The project is not adding plumbing fixtures or increasing the impervious area. The public sewer, storm water and water systems have adequate capacity for the proposed school. The transportation system is adequate to support the use. Other semi-public facilities and services, including electrical, natural gas, cable, and garbage disposal are available, and the addition of a school will not significantly change the impact on those services and facilities. 4. The applicable requirements of the zoning district are met except as modified by this chapter. The property is zoned R-3.5. Following is a summary of how the proposed use complies with the zoning district regulations. Setbacks. The setback requirements ordinarily applicable in the R-3.5 zone are superceded by Section 18.330.050.B.8 of the Development Code. The school will exceed those minimum setback requirements. The yard setbacks are: • Front yard setback - 31 feet (minimum 30 feet required) • West side yard setback - 70 feet (minimum 20 feet required). • East side yard setback - 235 feet (minimum 20 feet required) • Rear yard setback - 45 feet (minimum 30 feet required). Minimum lot size: 10,000 square feet. The property size is 153,767 square feet. Average lot width: 65 feet. The property is approximately 500 feet wide. Minimum building setbacks: Not applicable. As noted above, the setbacks for a school are established by Section 18.330.050.6.8. Maximum building setbacks: Not applicable. Maximum Building Height: 30 feet. The church building is 42 feet high including the height of the steeple. The building has already been approved by the City. Maximum percentage of lot coverage: There are no maximum lot coverage limits. Minimum percentage of site landscaping: There are no minimum site landscaping requirements. Streets: The property fronts on SW Canterbury Lane and SW 103r4 Avenue. Canterbury Lane has 55 ft. of existing right-of-way, which includes 36 ft. of pavement, 6 ft. sidewalks and three-foot wide planter strip. 103�d Avenue has 50 ft. of existing right- of-way, including 40 ft. of pavement and 6 ft.-wide sidewalks. Pedestrian and handicapped accessibility: The school is handicapped accessible. There is a walkway from SW 103�d through the parking lot to the church, which connects to the church building close to the school entrance. The school is also handicapped 8 10132/docs/plan/application/7/17/06 ...dch Charter School CUP Modification accessible from SW Canterbury Lane. In addition, there is an elevation inside the building that will provide an alternative route to the classroom space. Handicapped parking:, Accessible parking is already available near the entrance to the school, which meets the accessibility standards set forth in the State of Oregon Uniform Building Code. Bicycle parking: The Code requires six spaces per classroom, which for eight classrooms would mean 48 bicycle parking spaces. There are currently six bicycle parking spaces on the site, which will be sufficient for the demand. This application is accompanied by a request for an adjustment to the minimum bicycle parking requirement. Utilities: All utilities meet City standards, except for the overhead wires along SW 103rd Avenue. All on-site utilities are underground. A fee in lieu of undergrounding was paid as a condition of the 1992 expansion, CUP 92-0001. Parking lot landscaping: The parking lot is fully landscaped. Parking lot lighting: The parking lot is already fully lit. Buffering and Screening: The site is buffered and screened from adjoining residential properties, particularly those to the north, where any impacts would be the greatest. 5. The applicable requirements of 18.330.050. Section 18.330.050 contains additional development standards for certain conditional use types, such as schools, adult entertainment, vehicle fuel storage, etc. There are special setbacks applicable to schools, which are: . Front - 30 feet • Side - 20 feet • Rear - 30 feet The church building exceeds those standards. 6. The supplementary requirements set forth in other chapters of this code including but not limited to Chapter 18.780, Signs, and Chapter 18.360, Site Development Review, if applicable, are met. The following information addresses the supplementary requirements set forth in other chapters of the Code. Chapter 18.360 Site Development Review: Many of the submission requirements and development standards applicable to a Conditional Use Permit application are the same as for a Site Development Review application, and addressing both sections of the Code is somewhat duplicative. Nonetheless, following are responses to the application sections of Chapter 18.360. 18.360.090 Approval Criteria A. Approval criteria. The Director shall make a finding with respect to each of the following criteria when approving, approving with conditions, or denying an application: 10132/docs/plan/application/7/17/06 9 MITC.H Charter School CUP 1. Compliance with all of the applicable requirements of this title including Chapter 18.810, Street and Utility Standards; Response: The proposed use of the site complies with all of the applicable requirements of the Development Code, including Chapter 18.810. 2. Relationship to the natural and physical environment: a. Buildings shall be: (1) Located to preserve existing trees, topography and natural drainage where possible based upon existing site conditions; (2) Located in areas not subject to ground slumping or sliding; (3) Located to provide adequate distance between adjoining buildings for adequate light, air circulation, and fire-fighting; and (4) Oriented with consideration for sun and wind. Response: This criterion is not applicable because it applies to new buildings. The proposal is utilizing an existing building. b. Trees shall be preserved to the extent possible. Replacement of trees is subject to the requirements of Chapter 18.790, Tree Removal. Response: No trees are proposed for removal. 3. Exterior elevations: a. Along the vertical face of single-family attached and multiple-family structures, offsets shall occur at a minimum of every 30 feet by providing any two of the following: (1) Recesses, e.g., decks, patios, entrances, floor area, of a minimum depth of eight feet; (2) Extensions, e.g., decks, patios, entrances, floor area, of a minimum depth of eight feet, a maximum length of an overhang shall be 25 feet; and (3) Offsets or breaks in roof elevations of three or more feet in height. Response: This criterion is not applicable because it applies to new buildings. The proposal is utilizing an existing building. 4. Buffering, screening and compatibility between adjoining uses: a. Buffering shall be provided between different types of land uses, for example, between single-family and multiple-family residential, and residential and commercial uses, and the following factors shall be considered in determining the adequacy of the type and extent of the buffer: (1) The purpose of the buffer, for example to decrease noise levels, absorb air pollution, filter dust, or to provide a visual barrier; (2) The size of the buffer required to achieve the purpose in terms of width and height; 10 10132/docs/plan/application/7/17/06 n1'itch Charter School CUP Modification (3) The direction(s) from which buffering is needed; (4) The required density of the buffering; and (5) Whether the viewer is stationary or mobile. Response: This conditional use permit for the church required buffering and screening from the adjoining uses. There is a 16-20-foot wide landscape strip along the northern boundary of the site that is fully landscaped with mature landscaping. In addition, there is a 6'- high solid wood fence along the property line directly behind the church building, and a 5'-high wood fence along the remainder of the property between the church building and SW 103�d Avenue. b. On site screening from view from adjoining properties of such things as service areas, storage areas, parking lots, and mechanical devices on roof tops, i.e., air cooling and heating systems, shall be provided and the following factors will be considered in determining the adequacy of the type and extent of the screening: (i) What needs to be screened; (2) The direction from which it is needed; (3) How dense the screen needs to be; (4) Whether the viewer is stationary or mobile; and (5) Whether the screening needs to be year around. Response: The recycling and solid waste disposal area is currently located on the north end of the west parking lot, in the northwest corner of the site. It consists of two large dumpsters. They are not visible from the adjoining homes, but they are visible front Canterbury Lane when looking to the north along the aisle of the westside parking lot. Because of the distance from the street and the small viewing opportunity, they are not particularly noticeable to the public. 5. Privacy and noise: multi-family or group living uses: a. Structures which include residential dwelling units shall provide private outdoor areas for each ground floor unit which is screened from view by adjoining units as provided in Subsection 6.a below; b. The buildings shall be oriented in a manner which protects private spaces on adjoining properties from view and noise; c. On-site uses which create noise, light, or glare shall be buffered from adjoining residential uses; and d. Buffers shall be placed on the site as necessary to mitigate noise, light or glare from off-site sources. Response: This criterion is not applicable because the use is not residential. 6. Private outdoor area: multi-family use: a. Private open space such as a patio or balcony shall be provided and shall be designed for the exclusive use of individual units and shall be at least 48 square feet in size with a minimum width dimension of four feet; and (1) Balconies used for entrances or exits shall not be considered as open space except where such exits or entrances are for the sole use of the unit; and 10132/docs/plan/application/7/17/06 1 1 MITCH Charter Schoo!CUP (2) Required open space may include roofed or enclosed structures such as a recreation center or covered picnic area. b. Wherever possible, private outdoor open spaces should be oriented toward the sun; and c. Private outdoor spaces shall be screened or designed to provide privacy for the users of the space. Response: This criterion is not applicable because the use is not residential. 2. Shared outdoor recreatian areas: multi-family use: a. In addition to the requirements of subsections 5 and 6 above, usable outdoor recreation space shall be provided in residential developments for the shared or common use of all the residents in the following amounts: (1) Studio up to and including two-bedroom units, 200 square feet per unit; and (2) Three or more bedroom units, 300 square feet per unit. b. The required recreation space may be provided as follows: (1) It may be all outdoor space; or (2) It may be part outdoor space and part indoor space; for example, an outdoor tennis court, and indoor recreation room; or (3) It may be all public or common space; or (4) It may be part common space and part private; for example, it could be an outdoor tennis court, indoor recreation room and balconies on each unit; and (5) Where balconies are added to units, the balconies shall not be less than 48 square feet. c. Shared outdoor recreation space shall be readily observable to promote crime prevention and safety; Response: This criterion is not applicable because the use is not residential. 8. Where landfill and/or development is allowed within and adjacent to the 100-year floodplain, the City shall require consideration of the dedication of sufficient open land area for greenway adjoining and within the floodplain. This area shall include portions at a suitable elevation for the construction of a pedestrian/bicycle pathway within the floodplain in accordance with the adopted pedestrian/ bicycle plan. Response: This criterion is not applicable because the use is not within or adjacent to the 100-year floodplain. 9. Demarcation of public, semi-public and private spaces for crime prevention: a. The structures and site improvements shall be designed so that public areas such as streets or public gathering places, semi-public areas and private outdoor areas are clearly defined to establish persons having a right to be in the space, to provide for crime prevention and to establish maintenance responsibility; and b. These areas may be defined by, but not limited to: 12 10132/docs/plan/application/7/17/06 Mitch Charter School CUP Modification (1) A deck, patio, low wall, hedge, or draping vine; (2) A trellis or arbor; (3) A change in elevation or grade; (4) A change in the texture of the path material; (5) Sign; or (6) Landscaping. Response: The site is already fully improved with buildings and landscaping. The main entrance to the school is very visible from the parking lot. 10.Crime prevention and safety: a. Windows shall be located so that areas vulnerable to crime can be surveyed by the occupants; b. Interior laundry and service areas shall be located in a way that they can be observed by others; c. Mail boxes shall be located in lighted areas having vehicular or pedestrian traffic; d. The exterior lighting levels shall be selected and the angles shall be oriented towards areas vulnerable to crime; and e. Light fixtures shall be provided in areas having heavy pedestrian or vehicular traffic and in potentially dangerous areas such as parking lots, stairs, ramps and abrupt grade changes. Fixtures shall be placed at a height so that light patterns overlap at a height of seven feet which is sufficient to illuminate a person. Response: The lower floor of the existing building, where the school will be, has windows which provide a view out to the play area, which is fenced in. This allows a parent, teacher or office worker inside of the building to monitor the playground activities. The existing lighting in the parking lot and at the entrance to the school provide sufficient lighting for the school use. i1.Public transit: a. Provisions within the plan shall be included for providing for transit if the development proposal is adjacent to or within 500 feet of existing or proposed transit route; b. The requirements for transit facilities shall be based on: (1) The location of other transit facilities in the area; and (2) The size and type of the proposal. c. The following facilities may be required after City and Tri-Met review: (1) Bus stop shelters; (2) Turnouts for buses; and (3) Connecting paths to the shelters. Response: The site is within 1,500 feet of Pacific Highway, which is a transit route. There are sidewalks along both sides of most of Canterbury Lane between the site and Pacific Highway. l O132/docs/plan/application/7/17/06 13 MITCH Charter School CUP 12.Landscaping: a. All landscaping shall be designed in accordance with the requirements set forth in Chapter 18.745; b. In addition to the open space and recreation area requirements of subsections 5 and 6 above, a minimum of 20 percent of the gross area including parking, loading and service areas shall be landscaped; and c. A minimum of 15 percent of the gross site area shall be landscaped. Response: The existing landscaping is sufficient for the school use. No additional landscape materials need to be added. 13.Drainage: All drainage plans shall be designed in accordance with the criteria in the adopted 1981 master drainage plan; Response: The drainage from the site flows into two storm water quality swales and detention facilities. These were approved in 1994 for the church use. The school use is not adding additional impervious surface. 14.Provision for the disabled: All facilities for the disabled shall be designed in accordance with the requirements set forth in ORS Chapter 447; and Response: There are two accessible parking stalls near the entrance to the school. There is an accessible pedestrian access to the door in the northeast corner of the building from SW Canterbury lane. 15.A11 of the provisions and regulations of the underlying zone shall apply unless modified by other sections or this title, e.g., Planned Developments, Chapter 18.350; or a variance or adjustment granted under Chapter 18.370. (Ord. 02-33) Response: The provisions of the underlying R-3.5 zone are met to the fullest extent practicable for a previously developed site which will house a secondary use. Chapter 18.705 Access, Egress and Circulation: The most applicable section is 18.705.030.F, "Required walkway location." A walkway already extends from SW Canterbury Lane to the school entrance. The walkway does not cross vehicle access driveways or parking lots, and it is marked with pavement markings or contrasting pavement materials. The sidewalks on the adjacent street are already in place, and range from five to six feet wide. There is a ramp to the secondary entrance to the school (at the northeast corner of the building). There is another walkway through the parking lot from SW 103�d Avenue to the church building. Section 18.705.030.H.1. requires an access report for all new development proposals which verifies that the design of the driveways and streets are safe by meeting adequate 14 10132/docs/plan/application/7/17/06 Mitch Charter School CUP Modification stacking needs, sight distance and deceleration standards. A letter from Howard Roll, P.E., a transportation engineer, is attached as Exhibit'8'. Section 18.705.030.H.2. requires a minimum driveway setback from a collector or arterial street intersection of 150 feet, '�measured from the right-of-way line of the intersecting street to the throat of the proposed driveway". SW 103�d Avenue is not a collector or arterial street, so this requirement is not applicable to that street. SW Canterbury is listed as a minor collector. The driveway to the parking lot is set back 175 feet from that intersection. Chapter 18.710 Accessory Residential Units: The Chapter is not applicable. Chapter 18.715 Density Computations: The Chapter is not applicable. Chapter 18.720 Design Compatibility Standards: The Chapter is not applicable. Chapter 18.725 Environmental Performance Standards: This Chapter applies the federal and state environmental laws, rules and regulations to development within the City of Tigard. • Noise. Section 7.40.130 through 7.40.210 of the Tigard Municipal Code applies. The only noise emanating from the school will be typical children's playground noise. • Visible emissions. There will not be any visible emissions from this use. • Vibration. There will not be any vibrations emanating from play area that will be discernible without instruments at the property line. • Odors. There will not be any odorous gases or other matter generated from the use in such quantities as to be readily detectable at any point beyond the property line. • Glare and heat. There will be no direct or sky-reflected glare visible at the property line, or any emission or transmission of heat or heated air, which will be discernible at the property line. • Insects and rodents. All wastes will be stored in closed containers, and the grounds will be maintained in a manner that will not attract or aid in the propagation of insects or rodents or create any type of health hazard. Chapter 18.730 Exceptions to Development Standards: This Chapter is not applicable. Chapter 18.740 Historic Overlay: This Chapter is not applicable. Chapter 18.742 Home Occupations: This Chapter is not applicable. Chapter 18.745 Landscaping and Screening: This chapter is applicable. The site is already developed with a 16 to 20-foot wide landscape strip along the north property line, which is fully landscaped with mature landscaping. In addition, there is a 6-foot high solid wood fence along the north property line from the northwest corner of the site to a point about 300 feet from that corner. Beyond that, there is a 5-foot high fence all the way to the northeast corner of the site. 10132/docs/plan/application/7/17/06 15 � MITCH Charter School CUP Chapter 18.745.040 Street Trees: The site is already developed with street trees on both SW 103�d Avenue and SW Canterbury Lane. Chapter 18.745.050 Buffering and screening: The buffering and screening matrix (Table 18.745.1) does not show a requirement for buffering and screening between abutting residential uses. However, there is already buffering and screening in place along the north property line, consisting of a 16-20-foot wide landscape strip and a 6'- high fence. This standard meets the D-1 standard on Table 18.745.2, which is the same standard as would be required between a new commercial use and existing single-family detached homes. Screening and landscaping of the parking lot, service facilities and refuse containers is required, and is provided. The refuse container and recycling area is in the northwest corner of the site. The parking lot is screened by the landscaping in the planter strip. Chapter 18.750 Manufactured/Mobile Home Regulations: This Chapter is not applicable. Chapter 18.755 Mixed Solid Waste and Recyclable Storage: This Chapter is applicable. A school, as an institutional use, is required to have 10 square feet of storage area, plus another 4 square feet for every 1,000 square feet of gross floor area under subsection C., "minimum standards method". There is already a solid waste and recycling area in the northwest corner of the site, which will meet the needs of the school use. A letter from Pride Disposal Company is attached as Exhibit '11'. Chapter 18.760 Nonconforming Situations: The building on the property conforms to the current setback, height and other dimensional requirements. Chapter 18.765 Off-Street Parking and Loading Requirements Vehicular parking: The design of the parking lots meets the regulations of this Chapter in terms of landscaping, lighting, drainage, pedestrian access, width of access aisles, and disabled-accessible parking. The existing parking lot on the east side of the building has 103 spaces, including 5 handicapped-accessible spaces. The number of off-street parking spaces is sufficient. The Development Code requires a minimum of 2 spaces per classroom (totaling 16 spaces in this case) for a school use. The church and the school use of the buildings are off-set in terms of hours of operation, so the parking is more than sufficient to meet the needs of the school. Bicycle parkinq: The existing development show one bicycle parking rack near the front door of the church. The Code requires 6 bicycle parking spaces per classroom for a school. The school has 8 classrooms, therefore a total of 48 bicycle parking spaces are required. The applicant will install additional bicycle parking spaces, but is requesting a variance for the number of spaces required. Chapter 18.775 Sensitive Lands: There are no sensitive lands affected by this proposal. Chapter 18.780 Signs: The applicant is not proposing any new signs. Chapter 18.785 Temporary uses: This Chapter is not applicable. 16 10132/docs/plan/application/7/17/06 mitch Charter School CUP Modification Chapter 18.790 Tree removal: No trees are being removed. Chapter 18.795 Visual Clearance Areas: The site meets the visual clearance requirements of Section 18.795.040.6 of this chapter. (See letter from Howard Roll, Transportation Engineer, attached as Exhibit'8'). Chapter 18.797 Water Resources (WR) Overlay District: This Chapter is not applicable. Chapter 18.798 Wireless Communication Facilities: This Chapter is not applicable. Chapter 18.810 Street and Utility Improvement Standards: SW 103�d Avenue is developed to full city standards (40-feet pavement width, with sidewalks along both sides) and sufficient right-of-way (60') has already been dedicated. SW Canterbury Lane is fully developed (36-foot pavement width within a 50-foot right-of-say. The preliminary site plan does not include any dedication of right-of-way along either street, or any street improvements. At the pre-application meeting, the Development Review Engineer stated that the City standard for SW 103�d Avenue would be a 54-foot wide right-of-way. There is currently 50 feet of right-of-way. Since the 50' right-of-way was sufficient when the previous Conditional Use Permits were approved (as recently as 2000), and full street improvements have already been made, no additional right-of-way should be required. Utilities have been addressed earlier in this application. No improvements to the existing utilities appear to be necessary. The applicant is not increasing the number of plumbing fixture units, so the public sewer system is not impacted by the new use of this property. The applicant is not increasing the amount of impervious surface, so the storm drainage system is not impacted by this use. The site is already served with fire hydrants. See Exhibit �12', letter from the Fire Chief. A traffic analysis of the impact of the proposed school on the transportation system has been completed, and is attached as Exhibit '13'. The site is served by two storm water quality and retention basins, which are shown on the site plan drawings (Exhibit 'S') and the Civil Plan (Exhibit 6'). Clean Water Services provided a Service Provider Letter. Please refer to Exhibit '14'. 10132/docs/plan/application/7/17/06 1 7 MITCH Charter School CUP This page intentionally left blank ]$ 10132/docs/plan/application/7/17/06 Mitch Charter School CUP Modification . � Background. Chapter 18.765 of the Code sets forth the standards for bicycle parking. Specifically, Table 18.765.2 requires a minimum of six parking spaces per classroom. There are 8 regular classrooms. That means the District would have to install 48 bicycle-parking spaces to meet the Code requirements. Since the school is new to its location, there are no records on the number of bicycles ridden to school. Further, the school is a charter school, not a neighborhood school. Students will generally not live within bicycle riding distance from the school. Similarly, the teachers generally live outside of the area. Therefore, the demand for bicycle parking space is very low. Proposal. The Applicant supports bicycle usage, and plans to install 6 bicycle spaces at this school, near the school entry door. This is much less than the 48 spaces the Development Code requires, but will be more than enough to meet the demand for bicycle parking. Response to Adjustment Criteria. Section 18.370.020.C.7.e. allows the Director to approve an adjustment of the required bicycle parking by means of a Type II procedure if the applicant "can demonstrate that the proposed use by its nature would be reasonably anticipated to generate a lesser need for bicycle parking." Although generally one would expect kindergarten through 7th grade schools to generate bicycle traffic, charter schools are dissimilar to other types of grade and middle schools that serve students in the neighborhood in which they live. Although the Director may approve an adjustment, this application also reviewed the criteria for a variance, found in Chapter 18.370 of the Code. Responses to each of the variance criterion are as follows: a. The proposed variance will not be materially detrimental to the purposes of this title, to any other applicable policies and standards, and to other properties in the same zoning district or vicinity; The "purposes of this title" (18.110.020) include only one purpose statement that is directly relevant, which is #8: "Provide for and encourage a safe, convenient and economic transportation system within the City". Since Mitch Charter School does not have a geographically defined district boundary and draws students from a large area, many students travel great distances to school. Bicycling long distances to school would be neither safe nor convenient for school-age children. Children who happen to live near the school can walk or ride a bicycle; however, most children will be driven to school by their parents. The number of children expected to ride a bicycle to school is very limited - out of approximately 198 students, perhaps only 1 or 2 will regularly ride their bicycles to school. If over time, the demand for more bicycle parking increases significantly, the School can relatively easily provide additional bicycle parking spaces. On the other hand, if the School installed 48 bicycle spaces, and only a few are actually used, it becomes wasted space and a nuisance. Granting the adjustment will not be materially detrimental to the provision of a safe, convenient and economic transportation system within the City of Tigard. Nor will it be materially detrimental to any other applicable standards or policies, or to any other properties in the R-3.5 zone or in the vicinity of the school. Most importantly, granting the adjustment, and requiring 6 instead of 48 bicycle parking spaces, will not impact the 10132/docs/plan/application/7/17/06 19 MITCH Charter School CUP surrounding neighborhood. That is, it is not likely that children would leave their bicycles on someone else's property because they could not find a parking space on the church property. b. There are special circumstances that exist which are peculiar to the lot size or shape, topography or other circumstances over which the applicant has no control, and which are not applicable to other properties in the same zoning district; The special circumstance is that this elementary school is not a neighborhood public school. Many of the school's students do not live with bicycle-riding range. Further, based on the actual experience in other schools in Tigard, the requirement of six bicycle spaces per classroom is excessive. How many children ride to school depends on how safe their parents think their children are, how far away from school they live, what type of bicycle facilities exist along the route to school, and even whether or not the child has a bicycle. The School has no control over these variables. However, experience clearly suggests that the demand for bicycle parking spaces will not be anywhere near six per classroom, which in this case represents about one bicycle parking space for every three students. c. The use proposed will be the same as permitted under this title and City standards will be maintained to the greatest extent that is reasonably possible while permitting reasonable economic use of the land; The proposed use is an elementary/middle school, which is a permitted use, subject to approval of a Major Modification to the existing Conditional Use Permit for the church. The other city standards will be maintained (other than those for which a variance or adjustment is granted). Installing 6 bicycle stalls can be reasonably accommodated within the site of the existing church. Installing 48 stalls, however, is problematic in terms of space availability, as it would consume a substantial amount of land currently used as landscaping and automobile parking, and more importantly, would not benefit the children, their parents or the teachers and staff. d. Existing physical and natural systems, such as but not limited to traffic, drainage, dramatic land forms or parks will not be adversely affected any more than would occur if the development were developed as specified in the title; Existing physical and natural systems are not affected. In fact, the adverse effects on traffic and drainage would be greater if the School were to install 48 spaces. By installing 6 spaces, the School will not have to convert land currently used as landscaping and automobile circulation. e. The hardship is not self-imposed and the variance requested is the minimum variance, which would alleviate the hardship. The hardship is not self-imposed. The school is not claiming that there is no room on the site for 48 bicycle parking spaces (although space is certainly an issue, given the constraints of the site), or that there is some physical reason why it cannot be done. It is claiming that the number of bicycle parking spaces required is much greater than the need, and that installing the required number of spaces takes up valuable space that could be better used for other activities, and requires the use of financial resources that could be better used for other improvements. It creates a hardship on the school because of the amount of space such facilities would require and because of the on- going maintenance requirements of those facilities. 20 10132/docs/plan/application/7/17/06 Mitch Charter School CUP Modification • • The application for a Major Modification to an approved Conditional Use Permit to allow MITCH Charter School to operate within the Calvin Presbyterian Church building should be approved. It is an ideal partnership between the school and the church, and a great use of the existing building and site. The impacts resulting from the proposed use to the public transportation and utility systems, and to the surrounding neighborhood residents, are minor. No changes are necessary to the site, the church building, or the adjacent streets and utilities. The site and adjoining streets have already been improved as a condition of previous expansions to the church facilities, the latest being the addition of the classrooms and multipurpose room in 2000. The adjustment to the bicycle parking requirements is warranted because The application meets the criteria of the Conditional Use Permit section of the Development Code and the Site Development. 10132/docs/plan/application/7/17/06 21 MITCH Charter School CUP This page rntentionally left blank 22 10132/docs/plan/application/7/17/06 .tch Charter School CUP Mod�cation c . Exhibit '1' Tax assessor's map showing the location and dimensions of the tax lot Exhibit�2' Aerial photograph Exhibit �3' Site Photographs Exhibit'4' Architectural Elevation Drawings Exhibit 'S' Site Plans Exhibit�6' Civil Plan (grading and utilities) Exhibit '7' Lower Floor Plan Exhibit�8' Sight clearance certification letter Exhibit '9' Pre-application conference notes Exhibit `10' Neighborhood meeting documentation Exhibit `11' Letter from Pride Disposal Company Exhibit'12' Letter from Fire Chief Exhibit '13' Traffic Impact Anatysis Exhibit '14' Clean Water Services Service Provider Letter ]0132/dces/plan/application/7/17/06 23 - X� , �� . EXHIBIT 1 i � �, - �,� „o.,s � � ; i � ._-�- . 'W . �>� '� �,� . �3.zs � � �� 0 1700 a� 1600 a I 1500 �?� � , - - - , ae,zo � � � �0 3200 � �� 1 � 2 3 �� 1� � N89 27-OOE �O 9 , • , ,. �, �,� :� >� 1 I � �4 , , N I , w �_ 107.00 cY?� 108.04 _�.38_ I ^I ^� y - 'r , n , .� , roa. 73,� a --�6•e) � � I � , , � , , c�?., _ e? R Z I 9 u�,. �3.98 � "� � �� >: � ��g��- �" S � VIE ' s� ��e.,a ',� � ,� .�� , - _ � � - .r- . , d .� W ° W T - e_ s�.�z 30 �s w � - ee.eo � --��i.00 �L� �o '.�° � i es - - � - �-�- ee .. �� `,�' �.,' -- 107.00 :�P�� 9 74.64 85.1U �,38. v R�� a p 1� �� _10( , . _, � ., .. � �/�� . ,� , . , �X, .y . , . ,' �, �� '.,'Y� --- ,'d� �4.07 � 4s��6, in C 9�Q, . ,'�. ., . Y V . , , . , . ,�. ,� , .-�. -�. � � ,> 9.4� ?, - , - - - - E RA o. !o 9 � E �?4 ,, �, I 2o.�a ^��.o �;-9 s�.as tlt.00 � ��,ee 'ry .y, �, � . . • � � � �� :, ,� � � ��_ � �_�-� ��;:� , � I saoo ,� � � � ;�� :� 44AOC � 3600 �� 3 4 o M� 3 � 3900 � I � ¢ �.s� �,\ 13C '�� 5 �� 2 n� 4000 0� �m 1 0 a� 1100 a� �� 5 � .� F � . �'�, rJ 1 � i r ; � �r.. �, � 8 � � �; ,zoa �� r� � :� �� s �� , . , �.' Hes-s�-ooe '� � �� (" r' � r r � r) r r ,>' , , , ses-ss-aew .� f� r' r I r r . J J J .. . . 5 J� � 1� . , � .�� r� � 8 .z � , . , , � I I , , . . . . , , � , . , 1 , . . , , , � . , -.,�.��a r��>,� � � , . � . � \�\4,�\\\ . � , . � . , \ , . . " .� - - - 228.02 � - _ 117.00 _ _ 117.18 . �x� \� v I �f , MI � � � � ;� � ,. � ' �� "� 900 �� $OQ a� 7Q0 ICS29. T8 S I T E Z0� ��m a� ry� � ..'_ - - ��, ,y, " ' q � $�m .80AC � .35AC �l .35AC - -- - ?oo.00 __,_ , zs I�� r ,1 I r �`l ; 1 2 N N J r5 ,1 1� J � l RQAD 855/744 � � �� -R=14' i i >..�._ ` . 208.02 � 1 87-„ --c �--,�_ ' ,_,.r _ .5 A ^�� c39Y5' -- -- 11AOO � 177.i8 --� �- R - � 1�� , (149.031 �� as ��-F- ' -, 2 es�r. _ o � �zsn �� , f I I�EZ �eooss�roa�ts�r , �r: - - -- -- '� C> ry.._ _ 6 7� ; 71�00 -'', I;�': �� - 104.99 � 6'�.� �9�t0�1�� " 1=; , , � � � � zsiroav. Q ' � � m f $ �,> �5 , �,�" � �� 5, -ae.sa �e.o -�. -^�� , " .�47/kC � �'� 4 � I }:M�i�� 4700 � m. �� ^ o, 4 �� zsiTdan zs� � , � ,� �+��wri 1 � � p�po �Q v , so• zo•; � �i�° � �ncr�c- ' r� � ,� � 2300 �� omc�c�c� c� � ,y , m � _]88,88. m n m m o; ' N -3 -3 U .99 AC $�{��! �-- 2� -_ - 2B, - I `' �J� �704.99 Y " � . � 835/540 iq�,'�, 0 93-39418 � � �� LANE�� " SW �' CANT� �� --Ly4AlE � �4aoo mi� @.99 ---� -- -- - -� --- - -- N 758/848 1093/582 ', � ,. ` 2 ~` 0 �__ � - � *_ - -•� w i .1 . 7 AC �1`� �ae.sa a ' � 50• I I so.ao �ae.ee �' �ei.oa � l 82.00 ' �J �-. a� � � � �A�O�S71QA � � 113.5U 150.00 • 2G : �-'�132.72�� < �i � - � 1fi00.'�;�.� i o °' I � S8&51-00E , < �8�s;�, ' W I �Za�,�r 43 � �2 -:� i I� 2700 �� Z i � ` � $-rmo �� a i � � I i � 3��p� I � .14 � � �� m �� g��5 .38 AC �� ,u � m� m� o� �'� 2303 �i � �: i � ' Z i�-,° � :�5 �, �, 3 j a 2Sf10AD � �� ri� � �m 0°I � � 22D � n o�a�� o�� ,�' � -ssa3.ee -- �' � ��_ .39AC *,� 2302 m� �m 4300 � , „� I � I� 15, � �-oow �,' 21 � , 3 �� 1 Q �� - 1ae.ee M I � �� .84 AC � �� '�'� m 284.00 I � I .81 AC 110A� �� ' � , �� Y74.00 --- � 60.00 '---- I ,34 � I �� fo�a,' , _ 8 � � � r" � �sa.6o - - � � � : , 8� N � n � 20-' y C,� I TRAC'f"�" � " � �I , i g I � � \.�s� � ., _.en,00.., _ „ ._ - -� � iS �� a>��v a_:::�-...�- >v-�o��wmuM�-,�u-r,��.a, TAX M A P MITCH CHARTER SCHOOL �'0��' L D C CITY OF TIGARD, WASHINGTON COUNTY, OREGON o 50 ,o0 200 Design Group JULY 17,2006 a Paran compnny EXHIBIT 2 � F - ,� i .�•� - - , �� '�.' .a■�f�/_�' �� `� �►. - � � -� � �r� „�- ,�,,�; � '.., �•. . �. �,r . �'� i y � i I1 � + ,J ( . _ � • � ,i � e �I/Ir .K��.� '��.. � y/ � - - - ��: ..' � �� `'�� ■ ,• � �� ..� ' �� ^'� � � � ti . ' � !f ' -f�' � ' .,� ''� ' ' '�.�''�! � s _ � �.. � ,,,� a. � ��►r' r� ► ► � ,�:r�a� �i �'• F r' � ; 4 4 + � �! M �� L �w.�,1i• �i' _ �. �� -�^ : � , L�1:. � , � , � �yr . �_ � ' � n � �a. :� F , `i. .�� , � : �� r � \ � .� ��'! � 'r ?. a - . 1 .i"� � r :y. , r � � i i " t . 1 ' � ., ��. � � +�� tf � � �� . . ; ' b �, .. � +' N �� ,a . � � .�y i � �. � '• .. �,, ', I� e�. �'' . � M •� , s' � 4 � I r f�i � ,r ^ � - . .; , � ° � � � .h w i � ��'�� r• , i�, '��F,�r � � ' . . . � , "A . u '� • � � �, .+ �. � s I.1� II �.y,� 1 � . t� �. • . . � . �' , � �' t�4t' ` �_ ;� • �l . . " , , �, �y ' ` . �`�� ./ ' �� ti � _-`:��" , �� *�'� � y �'�,. �f�.:e�� 4�� :d ' � . _.-�=�z'c'�S'1C 1 1 �A.�M�.l: �r'��r` 1 A. �. � •� ,� � r � � � '�. � Q �. �'�� A�j F .�� , � M � ,�� 0 ...�,� '��'. .� � � ' ` t�'� �� !� � .. � , j' + � ` � . � . .i , « - 'i �� _ t .l ' �e�•',�^ ^*, k � '� �� + :� � -�� :. r �; � "�•� .,. ` � � � � ..��.-� � �� r .. .,��,�'r�� . . �� -. .... -....� - •.. R ,.M i t 1 ,f .F = r f �, � � y i � �i' � � :j � ' . i Y3 � *y�?:;. � �.._� :'�� • , � !� r �._. f ;�,.{ ; ;'Y.,. � .,� �� ' . � � � .✓ � � � . �ig..�iti. .;,t,•'y � • � . . .. ' �. .��T'y� , . ��, �� A s• 1J��' �.1 p ¢. ' �. . " "."' 11 ' r r E ..�K� �! � .� � . ;� a . � �• � . _y�'� '�� _ � � f� = �F � .., � � f � • � f A �w y � ,�..� �,� � �" '7� r � r � �� `� � � �. r .�•�`� , 1 - . ..f-� �� .. � • ` -i� � � • � ' �{' ' � .. . ' i � E / , � � �<i•; � �.`' r �_ � . • ��r � . ��:. �� ir► ��+�� .r �h .i��.k ;, �� ► { �.. , � r �'� . ' . � .V� �►i~ � � f� ,'•� � 4� •� ' ` • ` ' , � �� , � �� !� , � - , f '� � �n r � .�� , �. r �, ��* � � � � '� . , � �� ; t ,� . •, . ,� . � y �tir _ _.___.... � �' �� i. i , .. �=� � , . ' .+` � 'w , +� � . < ..l�' _ _�. '►,..�e. �a+ , � `r __ --.__� •� �r1t y •�� ' •� � Y�` �.�( ' � �j� +� _ 9fa-�� ' _� � , �,,. �� r � / �v. ,� � ., ' : ��! i { r ��. ti - .n� ' ". - "�! {+�'�� . � ` � � � � � s. .Y � • p �"�i,� • � ,' R .. ti. � ' ` �� , •� � ' � � rli� �� r. � e-S, - `j �� - i �, . �'�� `��i-��''r * �� y, � �� I � : �� is• � M � �• • • �,�. T j. ... . � . • � ')�t - �_ 1 � � t ;,' i' .3 ,� �` •k' t� a� �� r 1 '4 _ i r � � ,1,:)' � -�, x L t,' .. * t � ,� ,t � 1� +` : 1 + ' t;� _ � � :� � e,� ,. `�,, � �''� � .R r �� ` � �iu��- !�� ...�� i. _ . ��! ' - �:"�� o�/��/oc-i�..�av�-aa.c- v�.�r-ia.u\aaWmU�V-+oi�z-rtRUia.a AERIAL PHOTOGRAPH MITCH CHARTER SCH04L �'0��' LDC CITY OF TIGARD, WASHINGT4N COUNTY, OREG4N o 40 80 ,60 Design Group JULY 17�2�06 avnwncompany �x h ��b;�- 3 ..r-�.,�--=� � r , � ,.� ,� � %'� rrr� jf S ��,.. � �p'� .1�. Y�� ' �� t ��[[I��. . � � � � • �?�:�� _ LI11� .� . a y _ T ��''�� - ;�'�+.. �.:�.�t,. , ��: - �� r a I� ��`'Y'ti�&:" � -- .. .� . � `, .. . . .. .. .� . -_,:. .. �: ,--•�•:� . .. . _.:_ .. . .. ,. �' � �.,': � View of church from Canterbury Lane View of entrance to the proposed school View of entrance to church �. ..�, .,�_. �iia�s''�°r �r �. 'i � � ,yy, �ill` 1 , � �� °� �°'" �;�; .., ""�� _ 4 Y; - `ti. �::., s w ; �, � > .�� . �� ~l '�-- ��!� '�:' � -— —_.,� _. _�� - �.� -. - _, ,. � � � View of entrance to church/school site off View of west parking lot from Canterbury Lane View of home across Canterbury Lane from 103rd church �'�+'��'�,� '��',��'` tr � ' +�✓ 'i � yL.±-:;� �.;.�� _ � ,x". .� �, . ,e � � �*, � . � ��'`=r�� ,�1 ,.t ^1t� ` �� I �.. � „ � . � ��`� �� - , ; - �� -- �,..�,,,� . `Y� -- �!`��xy,�-`�' _ � �4 Y- � �c . ` -F's� k„ � - 'a �t� ,\ i ! � , �.� A. � i , . � . �� : _ - -- ,� � _-': x's E, ,��g ,.�.;_ � �p�Y.�, `• _ - .... .. . .. .,. t•r �'. - id f �� ►, _..or.: ._�.. -- .� � �.� • a�f�",�. �}Ar _. . _ f �.- �� 1 . ,�A, ' � �� ,�Rp i i s;� '�,Cy�� ,. ;� � � View of sidewalk along Canterbury Lane, View of sidewalk along Canterbury Lane, View of playground next to proposed school looking east looking west •,, �,, � x a. . i �� . " ...?� � ,�+fi �, -�:*, rt A �: .� � �' � � .` M�. L • ! A' r �' .ai� :�. . �, � ',�,... _ � ��,��,'� � � ....�L ;�� s �" " �,+... . f .�.� � '�". . .'.y�.y.�•,�,. . �� y, ..r�!'I��y�. ��•"'% . ' +`'� •'PTi.S 'd•yLi�: ..\ .:-5.. �...�. � ��` t � � �� . .°�� View of semi-public space in front of church View of 103�d, looking south View of Canterbury Lane, looking east on CantPrhurv Lane _� �f��t�','• ��F�'�'• � �� {Y. . . .,-_r- r , r�-ri . , ._ .. .. �ra.'� 'H. *' .�. 4i rt �"`° •��i ` ,,� �' � �t �� ;.� �., i! ,��.� .� �� r �".� �a'Wf s". r �C� � . iY• -j��,�� Y�a ,.h . ..� �•T�..��n::r^ .� �� r,a. ' � .+-� `^' .a; ,� � _ � YF _. � �� , f �.!�4'!�`n_� ��: ' ., � f i��iy.� ` �` '��G3�ht�� - 1 w� �„ '�!.�. '��.:�- ' � �� . < ,'� ,'` � � "L � -: :i*.��"i.-_ . �'� ��i��1�.�:'�� View of parking lot, looking northeast View of west parking lot, looking south Existing bicycle rack �`F. � : `�.�"��' _ .� {'s'� ;�`'� _ � �_. ..„,�� 9�-.'� _ ,�FZ�r�r• �i � �Yi��/ f. t�� Y'.� i#'� � ..��...�� !�`� .1�-I� -� �. .:NY �;;.�-._ ,1'L',�.. . 'r4�1�: .r r�i � �S}, .�� ." I � (t'. 4� �.✓ '' �e( '� .'.�' :a _.. i'.� ' �f"R�'.��. .r •� _ � � �j.. .�� , < - � ,;� .: � :: � !±�'�� 's ,j, � ��.1,. . ,F• � '�� :-::R,1 r'.� Y ` � �� .�. . ��____ .�' � a�.i.1 sl'�. l� _r.��pi/ � i _ ..,.. .. .... ... .., . ., ^ . � lf�i . View of Tigard Water District reservoir from View of fire lane behind church View of solid waste disposal and recycling area church driveway � � •uA p r ,-,-�: ' �►�. �� .� , , �� ° .�: �� ' ,, . �` �"_�. "" .� ' �y�, _ r ..� ��'„ �`_ \`, Vf '� ,t. �{�i'�rr�;,; t.,� ,,�" ��ty+,`'1F�"rrd�yr��,:!e l. r '_�'.l� �+. "0+- .:,..^�ew .•��' .��} .� • �.� , �.v f�* �� "� , ,�� ,,, =�1•�, /�� :�� }�.� =,_ � � � ,�.'�:.- , . . . � . ..� �� <' � 1 .x Y� 1L�... .. �� . .X b. � ` ' ��., .�..� View of landscape strip along north property Storm water retention facility line � __ I� � �� i�� - �� oc , �{�Q I I i 4 � I.�i � Z I� � k ' � s� � � � �� I I ',I Z �IiIIIIIIi�llll� �I I I.' r� g� � il I II �I i � il `� e � �� ; 7�� ,i SF n� , 0 � ��;I�;�� l� SF n � , 0 � � '�'��I, ��I,� I �i I < � i� u I I I � �n ,;,' _� �� _+ ,;I' � � � � �'�,i,, I �� m e - I � �� - � m � i� i� I m � � I�,� ,� � � � i�l Il l j� '�' � �° !i,I!� � � I �� -P I I, ;�, ;,I ;�, I '��,�� ,� ,� � 'i��i �I I� �' I'� I o� � i „ � '''� i � j I I i l �il!�i � !,'! I 'I��I ' ii �,, , � ;��;��'�� i� �„ ;� ,� "I� ,��. Z ' ,� ' � �'' �� I;i ,� � �� I ,ii� � � , ; � � 1 � � �;�II j �j i � ��'I � � i — �� ;�� ''' �� I �� I ��' 'I��! , � � � � ��I��,;�' �� '�� '� ��!��,� � � � I'�� ' �I I i', j �� I I � � � i!I, I �� I � � '' i , ' I ' � � i i I I � ' 1 i � I � � � � I I II� ' �!I � i I I i I I I i il l �II � I � �I I,, I� II I I'.,I I' I�iii � � � I I I i I 'i G� ��, lii � 'j , � I , ; ti.'�� i� �I�, {� � '��,�, II ! � '; � Ii �� --1, �'! , � i I:..�ul__ � I ��1 � �I . I�I � � r II I, � '� � , i ' m } �., �� i � � � �, ,,;,, r � ,''�i;t��,�' � I;� I I; .,i � �.�n,�� ,,,� 'i n� �, _ � , �I � —I — � _ �� II � N�' �� I; � � M� �`'� � � � ''��,d �; G ;li,� I ' I�� , �„ � , ;, , , � D �';p I � � � i� � �i I '; � _ * � �I, �II,IiI ,� - r , �, �, I ; t� I �� i �i � �, ��I � il � � i I I � � I , � � m �� ,� ��i i .,, � � a - — �� i I � � II � � l � I II ' ' � O ��i �i I � �j n I i I', � al�.11l� , illl �' ��ii � D I � � � � �I i� l; ''I , �+, I ,n � _« �II��II��I� �' I� � . �I ��I li�i �i,!I i ;a p ;'�I�i ','I ;I �i i 'I Ic I j� � . � , i z � 9 ' � I' �I� 1 — { I�� j �, f� �� iill i ij, i i�l.,!,,, �i�, li I� �i �I � � ,�'..I III I �,�j �� I flD ii � I � A � i ', II p,I I �� ii i, il�i I�I i � 'I A �, I t� • i � �� . �� I�,�� I I'� I u � I,��I�I� �� i�� E� —_�f��' p�; — �� I�� 'p��I� ��I I IIII � I �I � h� �_ � �I�II I I I I I � � il'�II I� N � �m :i III� I'1.... '. '.n .� � ii :'.j x1 � i' (�'� �� I. y ��,� � � I I jj --- O �� I I I�i I I I, — � �� i' E�H �z - jl I I'�I I' __ � ;�li �, - I , " � � II Iii'� � ��r� � ,� ,� � I � I� ,� I�� ,;i l � � � �, ,; � �i � � '�I � �;.: __ _ � � ' I i - � �` �—- ° I�' . -� ii �� i ��I.� .�--' S_ �� — .._ — -_ I�I��' �� --- ''1:�'�'.�! I;I ��, --- --- � �� ' � i `�°�, � �z - � , — — — �\a `.� � - ` i �I r� I � i I \ I II �' I N _ _ . „ �+ I �I I' i , � � E--— —e Q �� __� ' -- �' ___ < i � �'� �� i ��Ii �i � ��'I �c�� `� I ��'� � �j � �1 � J. � �,�'�iy, ' '� !�';II � i N 1 ---_ — I � y t� =� �� I � __. � � �,�.. I � �� - `�� r� I I�� }: , i � ;. �-� � — = - i � � —� c', I �� I Ki�<. � �� _ — � \' , � �� u_ �`� �� :� ,�� ' , �i , _ � � � �� , n= � 1 �,', � �.� i!I}� ', -- —= = '� 'I \ � � �'i� � � ,.._- �i�,�_��,,� �-- S � — --_._ � � �� i� �� A` I � � �', a �1�� " � � I �� / 1 �P + : � �� 'j I� II�'� i �° _ I ��II;� ^ `� _ - —__ ; e ��/ .i 7s — �� ,!�i � ' I \l�� Iv��l �� uI a i 1�'� 1 I I ` : � � � I i i �' � � � — _-- I � � �ill � ��,lii'ill�l I o l, ' ��6� � / � � i�� I� �I , � ' ,�i,�,�i � �� _ _ � � —� ' ��I�I' � �I I ' " �4 _— / � `� � � ��i ��i��I I'� �� I � i� �'�i�i�J,� �t� ��"� i�Q � — _ �� li i �I�, I �� , S, C',�r� / � � � II � I � ,� I � , i ,�� „ �� _ 1 � I — _—_ � I �I , � �� , � �� ,, �� - �� ,; �,i I� � � �� _ �a ,,�, f —__ � — a��i�-; ' 'I �- ',i' — �� m° � � ' ' � �� '�I� �I��'��: I� I ��<� � i � � �� , � � i �'�I �,�, � 'i - I , � � � �I � I,'; I i' ',; �;'�' o_ I a z ��. j I � ',;,�� I��II ,,�I i''Il�j'''I I � �� i, _ �� -�:�� _ _� ��n i �— --- ��.,, i� - �, . ,ca c �� C�`r�' •• . • . .� ,----- ;. ,, . ., ��' Presbvterian Church ' � �'� ° � � � 10445 S.W. Canterbury Lane ��'�,, .;:; �,,, � `i�,` -a �� "' �c��-- � � �" ��' Ti ard, Ore on 97224-481 1 "°°°x'°"� /�J SHERW004 OH 97190•(503)69T-Ob76 V' � ��i ':�.L.��. . O-• ��\� . � . ., , Li�1� mF N�r/ ,�DC�iT�orJ- 'SF-� N��V - NO2T}} �YATivN 1b��-o�V Is/X I�JT'N� 'r�(9 i O �-il`�B o czs2� oV� G�vZ 511:JI�..Ys �: - , i!-xlGiri�� C/�'�/q.l- � cJJErL G1j°- - �� ; � 1'N^IIJ M6Jt� PjUILpryJ��f -- �+�-!�+�a� ' � —��— = — — —— � � � � 'T� _ I li� �I�� r� - � i ��`�:. I � � -7 y- _ I , - -- - � �� -- - - _ I � -- - � I I I I I II I� II ( I I �'j�� II� �� , i �i � I','' ' � , , I �i i� III I �i!! ! I - j I � I I j �'�I �� I i� '�.�� I�I,jl�I�I�I� 'I � � i I ��ii�� i ,�II II I � - _ �II i I� I I��, ��( I I� li �I� �� I"�� : I f� � i � �I., .., �� I - __. ' I I „�i � �i I�. II I:- �, �III I , I � II� I�' �I� I! , � . � . . , i ' i � �II i � �I � � � i a -- - I� '� ��1� �� i �,� I� ��.i� �� i. ,I ii� �i� �I, I , � �� ' � - - -- I� I� � � I '� � � � i , - - i i� Illji ;1 I, ;� ;I,,�� 'I i i' I�� 'i i I� , ,�• i' �i ,� , •, � = � � I . � � .�*i � � �I � I "'�,,� �,;��il� ' li .i �i I I�II�I�. ��J.il I '! '�I ,�� i! '�� ,i �� III II j �,il i � ^o - - i � i �'� Ili il' �i. I � � 1 i ',I i I I I I, I i i ;I i � ��I i,li I, i, i ,� I ii; . -_ - �i I �� I I' ` ,III I�' � i �� II I' !i � II ;I I� 'iN �I �i I I I li � � - ---_ � U` I �I ji� ,i I, I I i � I ; I i I i �, I ,i, I , � - - ---- � � � �'I I I � � �I i , I I I ma -- �� I i ii 'II I I' � I I 'i 'I I i l � � � �,. �' _ i _ � ��I� �i i� i i �li I� � . '^ � - ---- I i �� I! ��I ,�� , � � i �I -- � � I I I I� � I � �� li � n � i I i' � i I i II ii I I i _ i I I i I 'I i I ---- � i 'i "� I I I i � 1 � � �' � �, � i' �� i' �� I I i � i r ' '"r` ---- I II I i I � il; i ��li �' i !1! `� II �II I� i Ilj ,I I IIi i ' � II �'i � II' � � � �' � I - - - - I I�� I , j' 'I i i� I� 'I ' ,.I �'i � - o - r I I i � ii I I I -- - --- I i I I I� I i, I � i n i i �I � c i �+� i � � I ,� I' I��, I i I �i' � �I !I I il I � i I �I � i I � � I � Ii i' � - I r � i �; � I' i I � I I i I i! i � ( � � - � I li II I I � 'i I� � I� I � � � I � � �� ,�� I �� I � �i �, � � I , � II 'i I I . , � '�� , i �I �I� � f� i �I I i i�i � I �I I' �� i �I, I li I I I �i { I��i i, I' i I �I i; ( I ��I. n. � i I .i 'i 'I� . �L �� I' �i � I { il 3i � II ��I I I I I I � � �i � i.I i ��I I� i I �I i I I I�� j ,�,� I�.�, i � � !�, i I' - �--- -- - - ;;' i �� i,�' i �� uI�1�I�IlI' '�,�i � � ir �i��'� i � � � i ��li � iil,'I il � i --- - - - r r.G,��,G ' � � gc�",F- � � � �ID nl� u -I-_ I .�t� 1�2 �„� EXIS7'li� MUL 1-P� � L��I�L� oX��s i� � TOt'� h;hl�L. � . � 5.`rf sH�Fr�iiNG �hT , NL-��!.°aODfT�sni , . �x I � T i N� NorZ. T �-F GL �V �4 'T" I o �{ - I �`� � i � � � � � N � - ---- _ ts3�-o'' --- � � � O� \ _ 21�-v„ q'll-tii S 21�-0u �Gol-o � � � --�Jf t��Fkl6-I�dk�---- j Gd s��;�rc�, U �. � i � (�-�VBI-�7 j i ,- � � , ToP oP P r7 �� N I �k`�' 2+�-�+� Li � o �m N � � I � �I ��_I¢ � � ' � � I � s�nrz,�-r�srs ��w �x�� :-�. � > I I � M�11� M!� �✓ui�.o�rlU � L ��rou�) � I r2ir.,�� j N�v �v�u�s �o � � � � �',I � � � I� / I r�r1A'l'c+� F+��+-T 2�� I I `� Nr�v Gj.�� rb �i � � I � �x�5-r,aG �vF�u� ;� �x��j�r�C3 t7� ^- F= CO�P StTiON SFhr.Y� / i � t".�t,Af-� �3� �F isTi w!1 �° GAYTOt.I +-FP�t-t� . -� � I �� ' �° -�' �-_.k.� � ' :�V�,.� ,.�{-rn I ':J:NG• - -� ,-- - ToP o� i � /u;1r(iit ��r.1G�� ;! �_�_ - - - - -. �. ._-- --- �J�4�ffPL TZr::CFtiO w�v.Y�,�...: � ° .ti,w� � +-f � _��/:�/ _� --'� �- _ .\ ! �eu�rs r-� - _ � I ` - : — - — - > i i I I�� I1�'�' I� i i+, � �,`iT+ �'t"� I , I '�+-' ' �: . � i i �. � .I '� I i I . , _ y.i I �1'i�I��F''*�'�� I�JII i II��.i I i�� ,I�..'I'FI � I �I � �!j � �� I I��i +I---• v'Yr_s�`c',_L�K, �I�I ��-t---,i � l~ � �I�'I II� I I ,I II� _ � P I� I� ��t �� I - -d �� I,,yt'�`'�A;I� �� i;�� I I �III� � I I � �, {.��i�� I � �iii'�IIj'� ;j!' i I I � � ,_ i I I I'�� y. �I:,� 'I �' �I �i I��kti '^�� jl �II� i'� �,�`� �..I �I: i .j�� II ,,I�' 'iIl I � ,.i I r - I ;I I � I '�I' i I' I� i[� � ';� i I 'i , �''I � �j II��I d,:,� �0 I 4l �' I I 15 i � i 'li'; �I _ I I 'i i' i I I � �i' I - I � I t � �y li � � I� I I i i� �, i � � 'i' '� ! �� T i �� I II I I� ii I � , � �` � �t�.. �II.I'll I �i I ,i�. I� I� �I ji �.i !,; '�� I r I � I� k ��I I' �;, 'jj ; ;:; II� ��; �ti: I .� i I� �i, ;!� j; � �,�� ;'� '� � i I I '��',I ,� ��,°'�'y lI �� __ _ � � �' i � , �� ,- � � . i I I � i �� ; i � I I;, i , � � �,�� ' I II lu�' S g _ � - - - ---- i �S � , � � I I � i II � i I i �I i' I � ! I - � i i RUSSEII L FAGH� I � li C'a ��i. i � �I 'I',� i- I' I ( _i. � i ?� i I ��i I� ��{' �i i i I I'�I I I I I i � ��I'I I i i i ;�-� _ �( � I r . N. i � �,..: I . I '�.I i �l 4� I � � I�' - .. �� . �� ... �I �I � I I � I I E�. � � , i'. I� � .,tl.Q � � � � r � � � ��i �i i . , �l � •H � I �• I _ �I !� . � I� ' , il .I _� � jjl n� i I i a �..a ,r c, IL�� i� 1 '� a�_ �,I� �� , ,ii� I •a.''I i ill ! I I ' i� i I� � � '' !i i� ' i iI �cutwETi�w:� = I � Ij '��Ii� II',,I!� I 'li� . ✓Xt` �I �CrX4 JC4 r��i� �X Yfc �;�I:n ,i�! loX+''� Ff` i I ��' I �y� ��I I �i�� iiI �� ; � . - I _ I I :i � i �� i�!I. p t - '� I ��'• �-,-J �, I i i', � II I I;� II�� I, ' ��F� --L------ - - �� i � i � � i i;' ' � --- -.- - -- -� �� _ _...�� .-. � ^ �_� _ � � � � ii i i"""'I lo-8-m , �\ G "L I r .M . A � �-:�.' � _Zg . � -cx.>- -�- - - " , 8 `�F�� i , .�rrc '"X i�'� � c ir.t� � A i I 3 _ - I � i � Q N�V A�I7tJl !I O1v EX19TIh� MULTI-PVRrb-'�� L.Ir�I� I 6XIST'I"-� Gh1�T01'� I"Ffi�LL- � --- - . N .�- �.t�Tir.1G� -_ ,ra�a� � H'n2-rr+ N � `v N � 12T � � L � `/�i ioN • II `8r�• .I �_ o�� y4- � �c.Bv�k�roN iS °'�OV� NEW . T�-t-aprL L�NE �l:j I `� . --=_----_�-__ _-_-___- -===--- , - - �= �-=_ . a= — — ------ -- --- � _— _ -- - — -- � ;- -- __�_- _ ---- -- � — -- __ . �-__ _ -- --. --- - - — _—_ _ _-- ��,. , � — - - - - : L. – � ----- — �� '1 —— � � -� - — `_ � _.� _ _ �_ -- – — --__ � LZ - -- � ` _ _ _— �� — — _ i �p _- — _ -_ -�=_� k � ---_= � - ; � -- -- --—_- _ - � x � _— — __ i� - -_ �o: -- - � � _- _ i -1 p - _ - � � - _ �_---- �f � o =_ = r�:. � _- - __ ---_- �� - --- � �`- � � _ _- n� _ _ F� d -_= �- --- - -- ;. c =_ - m - � � -= _ � _�_ __ � � T -- _- __ _ � -. � --- - _—� _ � � - -_� = n �- = O — _ - � rn Z , , �_- -- -- �5 � � —_- - �� }�a . _ ---___- r _)� '� - -_=– < '�__ -- <<� � — — --=- < � • � �-=_-__ - a ; 11 � d ' _ -- �I!II �� _� I" � 7 I , O - I�� —�- �--� P 0 �4� I'�'' ' _ �� ;� i' v,� � � �� i I j' �4 �� _ - I� ➢ � ��, � ��. 'I� - ', � � �=, — � � li�,� '� ��!�. — _ F � i `V � � �I �II� --'�(� � � , � II I' i � _. _ _ --- _---- - , ��li i�� p ,��li ��,;� _ = `_- � ° I -- ,_ �_ �",, i I;, L� � -- �� p ll� � I i � – - D�-i ��(�� ' - - - - I; c - I --- - � - 0 � _ e �S�, � � � � _ � _ �/ J _ ._ _- _ .�� -_ . .._.. XD hl I � rt1 � - _ - \` � � � �I L ___- -- '.... f� .-� � . ', : 0 O I �.I� ' ' _ ' C L y'....."^ '� , �I I��I � � � '.' _ � � ,� ' � —_ - _ � ,� — �r � z __ -- --– ,�� i,'�;',i � - _ _ -- I. � _ ___ i � i � - - - --- ��I�I II I I .� _ - � I --- _ �� _ h ,�i� ��i;��1, �' - � _ ,� � i, �l �I� �� i'li�i �i i i , 7 � = — - i i , i ii 1� L� ,�'� ',;,� � ''� � �,� ��`� ° – – bs ��`g � � � � „� __ – - - -`-+ nn - � _ �� ,''I� �, �� — � •�� I �� ; �m o - ' ' � (� �� 'i � I�I��ill�l%I I�I,II�ij;ii'�� I�I�;i a � � r p � I Z� C� �-{� ��, � � I, �I �I III �� I I� I � � i, ',�Ili : II ; II�f I I 1 < S I ��,I'h�i�' �III ..�� o __ _ i 'I !Ii rli ,i _ _ I I ,�II ii�il� �;I'I,li�li li�i � � �I I�;� ,� � ! � �� __ > I�I,I � � I II� I I � = � � ,i �� I'� i ,��; � �I = I I ' l' I ' �,,,I i � I I ; �! �, � , ,� ,� � �� - �-1� ---_ — - Q � �7 �� ;�� . �� _� � ,> ' �, � ----__ � ,�y� �' Presbvterian Church • • • - • '•�I • � . � �� ,�. ., , -/ -,. � � ' �°� � �� ; 10445 S.W. Canterbury Lane a cs �� _. . - � �� Tigard, Oregon 97224-4811 Po�oX��,�n ' ' �� `` _'_ _'_ ._ __"__ '__ _._.. . SHERIVOOD.OR 97100•5031 69Y�I675 . �� Y . ( W��-o� r�E.M r.ovrn�N �► t I`�I � � Co'_o� o�-��o* I �CL � 29oD 3�0 � �JlOO . .. 38sb . . . 3900. '�— ——— I __ ____ _____ _______ I— _—_� �._S� —_ ____ (� __ _ —_ _ _--(�--. __ ___ — I � ' � � � �I�.S'fn.l'y ��v,� I o I � � �-'i�IL CQ�mmrt�t � �' i � DE�TiiDl, � _ o • ',F�ui�f�`I +e m i EX�b'n�.1Cs GZNBwr4`( �FirL��.,.Aw�IG� - N _NEav cv2R7 ��nw3vsC•`�PE �x£7fi�Ys Lh*�GwPC ��rt6'C�w1G to F� NilsFt� 1 I ��- 1�+Y�S'R�.Ys � I �2 -�r�,�,rr.�J ��o caaMZ Fis,.,c�s. az�v�,�!.- � GVQ.27 hhm PC*�.S f�+-� I•�.e�JG PR�P.L�wJE. � � �� I `� i � , I . 7 I . � � ; �, I � =p � ! i / ' � I =--__ . 4 — --� I �----- � ' - - i — — — i �► II - - , __- --`_-�_- o � I�� i - ��.��'� li sMa��z. � —= I --z— �h i�-ri� I�: i,, � �-5c,r�_ — O� PAftw��.1ls � �i I � i �� IIII.�'�'�I FLoY4ROU�.,D. ,.I — - — -- -- _0 3 � I F-�F•TIwYe . f - �C.eT. � �'� � I�� i ��' � � ! - _ -- _--- 9 �t � GJ27� CxS�G1�1Z � I �' I'II I - = _ ` — y W ! ; S�n6�ni-IL $ � ' i ��j � � , � _ -- _ �-- � __ �, ,I i,, ' i I —T- �.+�� I. � x�v ,�o, � _ � � � � � � : I�IIL�� . -- _ -- - _—�-- �S r.roMi�r ' -� fLe�4, cp I�I: Ii I I II I��ij I � `� _��", � `�_-�--'�-- - - 84�X�O'b' � I ; `x 1 i' �� -�I .I��I� � .1�. � _- _ `-' �rCl`'-s'Ci � - I I I ' = _ �-Yi-Pa�l ED 1 � i. I 'Hd� �v FN �� 'I� 7 _��; ..r�- .� � o.uc.� � _ Awlp F�i.�t � s � i I II' � �, t-hntUsCAPS-� ' V y �, _ ea�roarr�� "�+-�-r�� rzs�s r� �,�,�, �.es�e f : , � ,�. � C�CVw7-UP -� �r — � i I j . 2s.00 7 � ;�cctniP�.E 9( _ASPM�t . E.�c�suG I i • - — --— - ftmrCL � � , E�C � tl, ( j .N2tU��n-� � F.�-Fi�/AT o2 p 'r---�- . . . . . . �' ' EX� in1f� �g� � $ GfLO / �' I C� Q �V rz7} __ � �Sl�rt��. i --- --- � C poorz+ ��_ % \ / i/ F i I � � ^ i --_ , ��.-��;. P� / �� "� w� Patt6"��uC� GK-v��l � � � � � g $,� a �i , � '% . � �� .�� C.fWRUi (aua.C1 P+Ca � � ' � ., � � � � � 'CL�imeo •7, �� ' �� ,$._.,� i r��, , - �� `� � ��' : �� 'T+fi� R9rLTi�.I � � � N �� y\�� ,%� \� `� � V�`� � � / � �'� � CA.�cZYwv�O ml � 7 U N \ �` ` �+ � �� A�� ;�� i�%��'� I°d9 � ; �� - � � � / ,�� V !i /� ��1' � � j � L C ) � ,� .1 �,, .�.\ ,� ' � I. � ' (� p c +i � �� i \;\\� ;/ t J: 9.28'a' I U O " ` � c � � ,hG ,� _--- '� F�1; ��\ � � I i � j � ,�� - �� ,e.t.e�SG�fli.C. � �Jf�J'CiuG 'C ] ln� ' , � �� f i �i � . — ��- =�---�� -� � �,� �� , o t i I � �'E N"C orJ 1 I �� y �f ��z�r� o ; � � � : �L f j�, � �wr+�rLG si-�oaN) � I �... � � ' A�, (I Ext i -N1H�e1" '� `f Kf��'7� Exl'�1�1� % I ! '� � _1% BII�R+�!�Tb Ti+��-, � ,"� -lo k :1�. / �.4 ra-i�-'z�� . •� _ t l � l+� �_ ✓V { /�. �;;,r= � �' - ---- �- --- - -L,�, — — _ --- - _ F-�L—.� �'' / $.ti�l'� j ' t� ; � �iIS7�f.S(� FiX�571NG c.� . p�v D\V� F7fL�V GY R`I. � -- - -- S. \V. GA-NT�rLt�UrLY l�,i�rhl F i (�ID TH � :3s5 `�� RUSSEL:L � � I'f � I° !-P� I�I • � I�D I�c�� p A. b b I �T' I O h� • �� __2 G � � `�j B,E�LLEVuE.WA -- -- "`OF 0� �-5-� _ B-�t-� � � �-'� : _ ;; F ` - - - x@ L' U� � J � • '2-, � �°� c�, i �� z Q `t-,. tt �;'`",� ' J � ��s �� ' _ P — - � � , �'' ` � I 'n,'�� • . --- __ ._.. �, - � x ' _ � _' '. ' , t't ur � - - i �,- � U� $ � 1 m i ,. _ �_.,,,�' � � z m p - � � � _ - - ,�'' ��I�f �' � m � T �� - ------- - . � ,�'.��i_ o �� _ m � �� 9 t' 'C, z E'- p �F �s � �` � � � � � i�� I �'� �\ �� ti� _ 6 � � �� ' 1 7i �� 1,` � � '��y� � ' \'4 \ .. - - � � x \:o„ L- � � � m ' - -- .r.� �G v � � � i � m4 b 3 � � � � � � z \ ��y �`�e � � ��ilt ' 4 ti N �F� > � � � � � i�lA(!i ,y�c„ `---__. X/ � � ti� �� ,�, a � � ed � ,� ' � n� �� vm � �. _ ;;. � ti �`� � - ` � 8s Y '�. 0�� @ ..� � / / � @ � �° �N � T+ '�1`Q IC � /i/,�ti�L ��i i i��j r �< / �. � � i i � // , /� � / ' i � � � '/; i / � � � m j � �o Z % � � � ' � �n � � � �, o �/% � �� _ � r � �� % / j� / , �: � % ;. // � p �� l�C ! L 'o.� /� / , ,� � � / � /��" � / ��i j �� L , , ' � ' ' ,�� j/// -/ ' ' � � � � �� ti�'��o ��i.� �� ,fi-, �A�', � j �:;i' i�� j� �O�� R R � � %., � ; ��" � � ' �,- , � �i � � ��`� ��'��%�� 'i� �� % � ' i�' � ��'�o � t / �� __ —�-�-.— � 1 � p � �� 9� '� ��//,' ��'�'` % � �� % �/� �i' � � —_ � , —� � �. °"�� .;. i .��" � // �/ ��//4 f"��'/ ��/��/ � �.._--r _ � �A � I � W �y �11 � � �'a �c�9,� / �,, �ti /�: iN i o tP p lN � lcj` S•' \ ,k � �, '�q' -t �`�`� � +� �� i , ��', ��% , ' ' �,��\ % �' �m _- �s. ,, _ , , � .1 r � , .. �'�� /% �_ :�� , i ��_ ,90,�'�` { ) � � ' �� N ��' ; � .t. '��/��m� -� � /,/�. ._-.G:'�L, �.. _ � ��—_ ------ --- � -'�� ... � � �, � i . 7_ C f i i�v� '�� 1�1 }� ��. \ � . //' i� / /�� r L(!s� �Tt,. _ I '° t� r t .� � �,A�� , �i� �/, D 4r,� �� Z�, � _ j l'' i ,� 1 % '��«I;�a�� X { �� //-,�1 � \-� ��4� I � � �� 3 � � � � ��'�� '� �k�l ��,�� '� x ' L. �< E� 0 N � � � L � -� - ! �L� � ��<�� k�� , ��' Z � (�� , A � s� (n � � � , r ,;� � x� , �, " �' q� : , . _ � 3 y �� L \ ,e ; ,, { �� '� �.��-� ,<, ��. � ;�. gG?;, � (l�r � � 1 tl � z�� ,� � �° . � �':�: '`*`*� / `,� � � . �y C a < c� a DI� p �� 7� � � L m � i8 ' I� E�.:��n;� \ � X�,y``CY�l ^ �`0 'x� i cD�t 3i � I� =1 k 4<,r i �� 1�C�.� �`� ��,� , y �� C1 � i! _ .� � �y „ I' �'� �'� fi, 19; >` �x � �Up 0 � -jz G � F� �� 3 � I ;<, � � �c�*� ^��. ,� � r k��"�t� ;`� ;�i� z-�U ,,, D �� - �� `r C � ��ijl , _ � � J7�i,�; � • j . , ,� ��, I,� � � � � � � �1, � �� ,��>� ,� � y� � '� r � �I�jd� S�� i�ui��' t�l L� I � I'. x�,Y�� , �,� X�� .�� ` �� ,'� �e j (�y-�� f �� i�, �� >'�,r�,!��!' ,. 'r`� i I,�� - j� ( � N N �U1 v1 t� 6� lr ��`'' a a � ' �;!; :l'� ,'`�" ,l`s X.>,,. � °��;i�6 ( D' _ � � � �� _ " ��'�° , I �" � ., r'�`�'" � 4 �k ' _ � ,�`� � � � �� m � j ;1 ��I �� ,? t� � � �� n IP i�� a b'� L. ;P' � ,_ � � ) _ ,� �i� q^�� „�r � � < < �� a, � �� r . � 't , > �� 3 i� � �3 _� • ,� • � � -- .� �_ � -� -�c � � .„% l� , r : � �:,, ��r.' r ��, �' 1�:,; �;� � ,� ,;i �,,;, R � �; _, \ , ';, z �r � � ' ' ��:i' � � 4 < � R' t� � � � ' �°�� / i 'S ^� ,�� ` , Q �S � i �, �c � ��s l� q„ � Z �n� L { T --- – ----- - ; � �y� �� ; � �4rya��' � , \� /` �lO 4 � ��r t �� u Y. � �1��1 � 1 <� f+`^ � � ��s ; � 4 � � , ; –�I �- � � �, �,k j � � � U � � C�1 N '� �(� �1� E � �t' � . ' ,; ! 7 0��'�A j�l c g k � � � ` � �8�, ( . �_� � i l• � U a�i7 lp� � m - � . � �^ � �,: C .z.� ' �` �., �-- > � ��_� � U' � L � Z � � � �`b� � �S��L� lr> .s.rl; �vf�� (1� 0 �'� 4� �' � r � � �. ��`y�''t � ` Z Q � � tN �TI � � � �� 7 � ��L7��{ � '(C ''7-'H� '�7.rN� �q�e, �,��„r� �� ' t iJ�� c� ��L Z sr � � f , -�p� x' c� �naldU' � � � � c�� i&4G � �i^ ' I! j ��$ Z ;_ 1 Il { � � � � � o � � �� ;;�; , � ', -� � i � '� �i � � �I'�, �'� L �. L`b,, � ; 4 r�� ' �� -� � a � � ;� ; ;� ; i pl � L D � 10J�� ' UI � � �.. �c � ' � I L �� N rn � (� L i U� _�� -j �i if � �,�� ri i �i� •I; {A �� I < � � � Z � � - � � i nr' � i �^Wi ��`"'�n �y,. i J -1 { _ ^,�v � � . � �. �i . . < c� � , ,r` ( J pJ - � U P I'I,'�` � 5- � C � D m U p � � � � '�1_:�` 1 _01 <. i � - � � �n m N � �� _ � � � � � � K tT! -1 � �{` � � (� � " � -"*J ,�'i -- � �-p A �� \� � � /�, f�c ilt � ` / i S��'(P� . . �. . T � � C � � � Z � � ' � i 6' # -�� „ � �' � � m n � � nOz � �� ti� � , �� ,;s m m� � � { � � al �;' \� __---� Z a� I, (� � c►�N < N � � �k � � ) • i----,g'1�� $�� iN � ��, �y � z � �q J� - i �' ; � �� \ U�"'� . 4� �`� L � � , �( �] _ v -1 t� � �_ �C� --- - - �l�' `' �.. �. �, i� i ��4� 'g�q� I � l� c � °k� � -! � —� < o . T- . _ �1 L ^ �i `� mL; � , � �45 � y.,. 1'4 . 3 � O � 1\ X � � L N S 1�'. �`� � 1 � �^'T�'�4�"""^-�� .:d s4' r � 4 1 C � �' ' _ l 0. G._7 _'�., �J,o � -p � � � � il > i �� 'i� �7,j'� ;�;�. , �. �� `�`��..� �.�� i�� .� � �� i�r y„� ----� � ��o � � � t��., /-� � � ' �� ' �"� � yc , i , . � � � � �G� ; .,..,� t" �`:A � i � '-` � ,. - � am � 0 � � � ; :�� __. _ � i�� ,_ , �` - - �`° -._.' , � � � ` �. _'" _ � _ _ ---- i ;� H _ . �f 1' � .\ , . 4 i , \ ^ �^ - ..._.. . . .� ) � -. ...,, ,'C � �i t� U p (�J L I ��\ - - - �� A'f�` � - -�------ -- �i,W C+.�"ihp �,�'�'.y R'c. �-.� �Q �i ...___..... f___.. .. _...._.. ..--... .�.__._. . , � �4 � `Z� �s/tp � \�. i �� ^ � �( ` � �k� �p��_"--'—��Q --�-- .._.� ��j,�'`S� { ` ni� rP ' Z .a1 � � �l \� � ' 0 L }.�' U � G� � �_� -�--------- �1-- �_ _._ __ _. � ly Y ty,_ `'�'/� � -... ._. � -- ___ -- �'� 9.v � _._----- � �_ •_.�� -_.�-�_ � -- --—--- � ��r� ��`� �� O��3L �� '�� "� m ✓ � `i z, , � ay��s � -��'-w� a �� T� �r1��..�1 I� • g4- f�. L. L� �� ►co. �' �� r�� ,� r.s�ti�,/ :�r�c�'U�rz..�°` �,��t�'��rJ � r��I t'P'��"�" Y� w� '°��,,x�,.,= �> I�4�1-�a .��U �A��-►�.r��U t��'' I.,.N ` ,�� .'�''' , - y , .... ..l S . � e;;� _�n2� t8�..pg.,.v1- AQ�1� T�?? 6k7C_ � I42 c.Att�rz. MuJ. .4�?�rzlnrR�. @ �----Y io,�a,2000 a�•o.�,e t'er?�nn�erc T`�P7cJtG�.; G_c�a�N claa* ) tlonTrs�� TL - 29r,o 3 0 � � o _ _ �o 3�o 0 380o i o i 3 c o �,/- "��,J � I, �__��_— _ � �,�_ __ __ __� _ ± 3900 4 ' -_ '_ ._s: �_��_� �_ __ _ - - - _ - � � �� _�. , � . . . ,• ,. . . . . . . r , .._._. — --— -- � Q . . . . . . . ; . , . __ --,- � . . . . . - � � I� I' ° ' � i �r Y� o � � _ _ " - . • . • �.., �• ,•� ._ , : . . ,. . . . . . . . : . . . . .,- � � � f o � ' � `l � , � � � � , ' , . �. � n �, .�. ' � � G�f��1.� � i � ��i�i�� . °� � .i . �-. -- ' - � � � E-ittEZT�NCa D(L�V V VfUII�M CC�KVID� @_� � ^ - - ~ � �!�`I �rtrG�,.Lhi.f�) _i Fj-Z^ �:G.�j�CAr�.�E.(� . FiX iS7�A1G LA+.irJ�A�PG=- F.t 4Si.�uJCo fo�� H Ilmkt� i -�.Y'.3C LS'�i1.1G�..._. �3 G-�l.scN CA�,IS}(21a ToT,4L� �2 -6G�'�'w�t, ��-tD GEaRtL P�N�ES � � G1Z�Vfitti�-- � ^ . � Ga12(O !°a1D F2.-��5. At-L� Ab1JG FiLOF;L�rJ�. I I �� ' � '�� --y. �I _ � I �.. _ `�w. �X�T��_ 1 � ❑ i � G I� I �'��(�1iL�'�.� L8 ' � . � I f� �� i � � �"'D � I 7� ��i �� I ' � 8 �.�tiS"�yG �'�i�' . I�' ('I� =Ex�a-r��aC�: o r.3 v � I f �� ParLwu�� ' , L� �� I��' � �n��r� � � f � LeT. I , �I�ii I� �'i I P�y��NG�. tZf.�o� �xixu�G. j� LocATioN _oF � � o � . � � ; I I.,, i, co3' �.GfL�o�ND t-.EVF��._.. , ..��)P�SSF�'3 I ��1C� a . j I I I I!I i i' ! ' \vOO�"RGi,hT��•. ... ' -?_{Pa_Ty�Li_1__:� I � -G+�2.P.>,C�l1TZEiZ I � � SiDEGVH4IL.._$' � �� I��I� ,�� _ ; � � � � I Iili� �� , : a� � '! j �' ��I I'j�l I - _ i I I ��.� ' � x; � �� III�; 'I �I'�I� � %�?�i;�. � I �s I�;i � i '' - -- ' � - I�� .� ��I�� _ i�/ �. �� . ( j � �� .� �� I I� � �`-�_ --_ �D� ��'� , � � + �- � � �oPeo- ./� ' i 3 ' I I I I I� �os�r�nl l. "�l�7 [�rS � �v l�u.iC> E�Ft. ppq.K+n1Gr LoT�. ! i � :� 2s.� �4�_rt� _Cr�wT-UP �e2r�nP�v; � � � ` I . " � � - _ I E�Sr�tn'c.7 • � eF� ' +I� `� �� . N� • � IC N i PiKiSi �rl�yB�� f;SPrs�, � _ \ 1� t+c' i Ni R 1 `''�O - � � � \\�\�� 1 I C r k�O�+�C� l�Fr] � ��., / � �-, - -- � �� I fi (_, —_� � !„ � \ \��`.`.\I � .� \��\� f� exks-��uv c�..v��1 � ' � � p � � , �II�� I� ' ,� �\�A�� v �' � : c�+4�lu�k�!' �u.�7�wc, � � i j �i i � , /� � �\� � � �� i , �7"L_&teQ__ --� ii �� i., � i:i � „ , ,. � �� •'��. f �"C+hib Po2Ticot.l ' ; � ! � � `V\ � i � � ,�A ��` �%%i� /�5 // I ca�5-tn.uc.�o ��1 � �! � � c�V i \ � � � _ �� ;^ �¢�, I , � U � � � � � � \\ / / ��/� ' {5°d I � � ':'�°' � �; \,,��\\\�;\"• /i� ��' � I j� � j � � � � fr \��` �� t � 1 C� � � -� � �� /.�;- \.�V� i � � . i � p �' .�� , W \\, . -- - /� �y; I I � � � �kv ,� � ./ Cl,icSSK'a.FE .� � � I . � "��' ,r-�-'-- -E-=-+ '� . F,r��1G i � i t r' iVfFT�Z' �4t+1� � � � �� ' I � G�TE NT ol.� -`- cn � �t � I �� , � �w �,�� , � L�z�� ; ; I � v � � 3 / � ��+�--zs ' � o . 1 � � y � ��vrren.�sr�,�N) i � � � , • i � `/'�X�TiosC� � ._ J � �W-1F.1 EyTI'LJ� .. . � . �. J ..K�LC�TE Y�G5TIAG Yt � �-- .I ; pIK,E_$�i,C.�_�b_'ItS15 � ' �� e0 N ` , ! •._�4 .' I.i� �'(tFl� - w �' A��a �v-�_.�� I I � I 1 - --- --1�_ _- - -1 -� � M = ' II .�. __ _�._,_. _ _ i r� "r� � �f' _ _�--�-` � , -L Ex:s-(i;�.rC� "�S�nv(�` Pet.f c..oeJ7. ✓ - � �,. � "Hf15TIN(9 __ i F�•YIS�fNCy i pt7:�v�s�v� - .n2�V�YfY 1�.. � -- -- ��,�?n, 5. �v. c.,4-N-�-�rL r�u rLY r_��.t� I`l0 T+-1 ��,�ss ��, =��'r� __.p-L�-L� _ �'�XI_�"rI_NC� coy . il I Pusse�•� �- cn� ; � o - b.� 7'1_ot�j� ____1. = 2o i �� , . - - --- . BE!�EVUf,Y!A I n^� t+t .. . . - ! -8-� .. . � . � i .-(�j_r�.tX� � i � . .; . -. ' .._ . ' � --��-��---.. :.. . t � ' �� . - ._ . . ... - ��-__:.�..-_.. --�-_.__ __.__.. _ _ . . .. . . .. ..,. I i � N Nm -rH PiZO��rz-c� �..�r.�r� __ - -- �` ' Nm2Trt P2of��2 �...itir-c _:�X�S.�I�Cy..C�E7..-- . __}}ilst"�.. GF�I'F(L . F�NC.1�1G� PcT:_.._..._.-:. �---� _.�i._f'CLOP �JN� - ;� x � S �- � ri ca f� u F F �- fz , � - '--- i Gors�i'z.?G7 r��V `i' FT F+i�11 -<-Vca,otiE F�n.�G� \V ITk't (.2�.C.rftrtES f--' E�X� 1 �S T I N !e � � R � L A .N...�.r—� PI76T/I C7� t�EzJ�/ �. EJ(l`'.-si��.Y_a � To ENG�a6c- _C��i�C`ff�+Pp �-?�i�DS1��ls1Ce t-tfrH'7. .Lt:i � N6N �w', GUZ(1-N'�2L r�rW�t.I GiJ.[� Rf-Y7 P�-+Fe.i'G�fL . iJti�V 'PJU��.Oif..l�s .- � o o � � � �. . a C. r . ..�� a .. '�., . .. � �hH�� q� {.�}H 4X,.q . � � j �--- — \� —t ��}�- �«>� ` � � ; � • � � � 1 — , �03� i � �� I _ _ -- --_ -- � � i� � � � -- -- - -- ^_�— � � �'LP�NT �GH�dUL-E F :- . � x^ t- -, __.._ . _.�_ _ � ; � , �q . � .. �� — - � . � ' . �O _ 4 /i - - — � �°>>. V1N� N1AP�-P� C/St4EiZ stRGlhlf�r'TVNI,� � ' o � = = _- - . �� _- -_+ _- � ��_ 'CII 8 F7 l-kC>tt G P�-fT*rtlN;y t�rJ _ /! °o . � - � , - - �N Gww�i�S oF �3l or� rh�rc� 'TIu�K�- j � � � - = ' ��-f �u H� si-r�,��. PFzw�v� N�v � ' � __ _ �= � . � � i �ac, � _ -� , �},� i C4�� IZ� �PI N_�L- _VEicfLLEt'y fCkt�DF"�,1Lif�P � SiDE�ND�!t*�C7� • �`l" :Itil_ !L � Ce�9J 5�z�. PLR+J'r �tT _, . ` �xiST�Nl� P2Fs'��ivc��. � I "3.F�Z 'CO �� tM�, �V l't�R�F Sltm�y,rQ i N�W f✓ui�-+�i�JG - - (�(-A`f G!Zl�JUP W CtH' ' � . . . ^ . == r��+�.--r Px-r{+s � . I .�E-�� ,vrr-��. ��F'co �.u4K-K+�1 'I'2�NUS � � ` n - �h� I , � ; . . `{ R.mGF�-FZASu�:� ° Irl,° t i8" H-tc..rt}� � � ��.N E�u cv�cf�'f� � 1 !�T PLl4��(11.�. �f' IN -Ro\V S I � � r � ' Si��zn�l NCs T;•---� _ i _@�__'b_� c�, W t-1�a-I�s t-tm��N � 9 � '. J 00 � � -- .-.t.IF�..:�tE;D�� _ . N ; ' 1" � �4'0� ScoT�r+ I-+�� M.�.vNA wwt.iZlS� � i� � �t � — i IN w F+r��, Pv r �i�� Pi+.>1�.. � {� � � .Ft44u�2tr?C-� �r�r��7�5 -fN�'t� �flc.- ci�N�. � '`T' � � N 6� � I P!�!1�NT P.� FT e�. V7t-�#--+'LI��l�o�vn] � /� � � � �Y � � . -� �I(S7t�'__._._ • � . � . �/ . � �� - , ; Y'I?�J1P� 12�� Mii.l, P�PTtt �T9P Fs?CL.�., I ` U � � .. , NoT�.�- I ;(�.I.-�N�GU R.�TwJTir.1Ce�- ��:p�.�.� '� - - _NF�u �h+.,rrscnFihlCy. I - � 'l-+�� oF � j C U � � RT �c�i�-Y� ..t.€i'+ � � ' �tF T rJCa' -1 _ i �p�0 V tDE 2� Nl irJ DrcF'tii� I/1�ulvti ��^y � > N _ � y�F�_f C�P�[?-i% G+YP, GoV E�{Ur.�G� �4-1" Prt�t� � F �t- > .�_ - —___'-_ _ s � .,N�hU PL/1W'�ltJC7' I?�c(7�'J `� � , � Uj O � �__ �� ' � � � �- - - = �------ - ----------------- - � � "��.`Z' � - a �� ; � � �, �� ;�F�6s� � � � � _ , �i �a-�i�.vt�:_ �. °------- . � � __l,�s-r6�aa.. N�au -._.._.. .. --------------- - - . . °�`'�� . `"v�"_ .. -- - ---- .._-----�-�-------- . ' �XI"r PF�-CPi _ �J = Got�S-CRx1G7 N�N/ = PcT �3cI�TrNCy- - � pp ' �p p S�v�vAi.K- �'•�N� Y �u��viNG m �r�'a TD cout�r�c7 - , UZ ---_-- ' .�X�6�1�-Yr SIF�?lM.1�- - - � wE�r N�v - LaWPXt. l..�vP�. �. K 1 S 7 I N .'.Ca.. L.� �. �v � �fLr4 N GE '.. '.,,., F?-_._ CL F 1... .O m _R.. �:,k C6N�S^Cf�/JCiT N�.�I �1rSv"' . _G.,�v ��«�� [�Y" 1355 '� �LGr(/�f7.�Gk(� �� AtNi1�Ya \Vh!:_�• t.�' T�� y FUSSEIL L. EA - - - -— � `q�B,E,LLEVUE.WA �:�xi5��NC� ' 'c OF Q� t-�NO�n,�a� ^�-'1 -- --- � . �1� Nb5G� p � t�L,a. N • 1 ��= 20 � / L2 � � 1 r.R_.._.._.._.._.._..__. .._.._.._.._.._..__�..__�- _---�._.. _.._.._.._�. .=�° .._.._.._.._.. ; . .._. .`_.___ _ _ ! Q-� _ ��ccc ME7 � �[. b � Nq v ULT I I 6-7}00 I� '� r �, RENSFD N ��f.x a nar wlw � �•i�i �.�-»• �b I e-'-"�I--------------�-_-�--�------- -- --------- ------� _ ' �-��'� �- � _ __ - � nr - ' �_ � ) Ij� :�� I �•cv.cwl � dw I ,__� ____--_'_--_---__ _,___.__-_- _ -- \ 70R � _-_ `_ wr • � � i °' ________`--_-- �� \ \ �1N['Da1�.D� ____--_MVMANT�!101i � , -_. -_ ��____-��- � `-�1 [�.7n1T____ ____ _�I�,� 1r � I i hf-00 0 .D , _ I �_" '`- _-____ i `� _ ' .� \ � ��l'. I � �1 ` �`� `//wra�ie '' I LLCL � � i ` �\�.ur , I I � I rr � ww raNr, �c eo.ts I . � � � � ,¢�y,,, 1'� I' I / �� I y � aion ur wu.ei ttn Wtlfr¢tv. rr �/ ' rnc \ \ � . � i� � � � � I I[!0.?I �.sa i:iaae �.:s i �� I 1� �'�,� \ , I : I I . . �� woom r.�o# �� `m I � ' . r , I I \ _ ��C �E � ItlY l306 11011 CQE \� \` �\ \�\ �� 1�II � 4 • _ ' ` �� O: � �a ew � m w�r� % �` \ �` _-=_--1 !� � � 1. I I� I � , . , ��,�a � ►�.e ,� � � ` ;I � 'j--� � ' - __ ,� ,� -,:,�,,-' � � � ' �� '� � � I 2 �, , � y ^ � ' ' � : ;a ! v i � % , '� `, �; � � ''., �i � ! � �,.� ' � d� 8..�2.L� . � �`. ` , ; ; �; ��,,( � � � C� 2 I � � s..mr � ' ro x�cuoom ao' � e•mv arT m.en(w) t ; I � I I � � � tx e'm et / K�o.a/ w�v�ews �� \ �, � � ws i R ►u�ccm•r c� �,',,� -,., \ \ � I �l`.�:�• = i • � � ��_-__.� . i Ru lO.Yo ,��` I ` �I i, i � ''°°° i � s'Mv aur eais(� i� �as ro oc r wc ' �'� � � ``�� 4 ' � ti i I q � sw ve.ss r / � \ '� i I i�:'� ! , I � Z ti `, I F ' � � '� � �� t�ii •` ! 1� � ; � � � � i I � i � / '^�,,;�''mr,-�_-----� � � 1 � �� I � L � � w 1 � 'V I � (� P40PCSE.^. 3U!LGIhG f/ � \\ \ � � �i 1� , � I I 1 I � `� \\ � EXiSTING BUILD�NG I I � � �.I � t � cn.,s ..�,.y`+i i ` ` ` � � � ;ii� � �' i � � � I\\ � .�� ',\ �� oo.n.i �'� -—----- - �'°as°J J � ' �` \1 1 � ' ' �� \- � a wnrr wr m� I L � � } � 'I I�I I ' � I ,(�-� �\ '� � rae�r mu�nm ' i� �w \ , � �; �I�; ' Q �r,�I Q - �� , , ;--� - oc d, ,^:A , I i , 1, ';"� ,� ^� � L. � ."' C�.� � � \ � I � r�� I I .._ . ', I� � � To�E I�F)IOYFD -,�..�. �. 1 � + ---- m'°°o„a mm RY n.�s 'j ��•�..,. �_� [uoo� \ 1 , I �, �;�; � • `1 �` z•.r riecno_+ss e� • - , I I ��1 (tl��►azv x�r�a[rw -� ` � � t ;�;� W � I� {. t � � ,\ E��..�,�,�(� :�`� — - - - - -�— - - � - - - - - - - - - - � ' ;1'--r-. _ , �01 INEZ � m , �� .�sc u�orm,s co�+Ra.,�us �� `. � ',, � ' � �'i; uw m �u i - _ �-`� �ooa nu ca�ewKt `� `� � �' �� o ' vaa ' � ! � �;i i� � i O , I� \ � I _ : —— __ �'� —— .�„ """"�� •� ,��„�.,� �,..� . ` '� ; � �;� : Q — � � � � �. , � _.�=', ,� "°�� ,- / ,, ; ,, ',,,I o .� � ! � .. � _ , . , � :. , � � � ' -�� . ' r�' �, I �i- , ,' i� i , �._._J��i' f� � � i /� 1 .- � i �' i j � /i r-. 'i�.�I 1 Q � � � � . \� �--- � � � i l'� �� i i� �i i� � �i . � �� , , , , ,- , �� ,� ��. fi , �.._ � i �x�srNC sui�o�vc i � , � � / !I . exisnNC ew�or,c , � �/ � � / i i �i �� 3 � . I i� ' I I �-- - i i i � i � I; (/1 • �� . . I, �/ � l � � /' �� /� �/ � /% // � �� ; � I I � I I I I , � � ! � { / // �/ / � t�� I I' . �' �� i � � J / �� // � �' � �= �/ � �� I '' I I I� ��-----� .�\ ExiSnNG Bui�D�NG ��V� ' <\ J I' i�', / i// i/' / i i �� ',;\� i I -D � \ 1 i� � � � i � � / , i i � �� ,�: i' ,� I � � I � ;; '� � ---�--� � ' � � l � / i" ' ' � ,'� I p � � , / / � I . �� i i'� � ; , --- � � i .� � � i � � , �i. g ' � � � i� � � � i� � � ! �� %� � ,•' � � i � , . -� r i i ' � ' ( I N I � �� i uoniaa / �� f i i � � � � � � . ' ' i a�t wi[ i � � I' :.. � ��I. I � I i �I .. � o ! � � � � � � �i• � I I � �/� �- � ��"i � i 1' I jf !�� ! I ',�I � bl . Q V/ �� ' i ----____ � � A i �� i � i � i--� ' � '�k , � � I� ?� ___ • ' l ` \ ` I ` + 1 ' t f � I � : •� � �� 't { '� � � I i �� i : � �� `g • — __ `� --, � ', ` �, t � � � ' i � I ' � % � I � p �— I � 17� � `r�''� � ` � � � � �+ i � � X i • � +� � �W � � � � \ `� \ ' l ( � 11 � � v r I '_ , � ` � _ _ �� ,� � i ' � � .+-� � � � ''- �cea�m�c vw�r wm� �\ � � � \ � � � �� I � � i . U� p j ,� � , �, �,u�neNCC � � _ � � � 1'� � � � . � ,�//.�� \ ` ` _ c. \� \��^1 1 � \ \`r `� ,i � .� � 1 �"� / -�� I � � !_ . � .—. _. ..—.. ..._ ..� .� _ — — .` .._+ _ — .:_.. _ _ .._ —•1—• — — — -� �' � , : � \ ^� ` 'r % � msuGo maE.u�,��O./ i.� �- i. i^ i I � _i � ) � ms G , I j1 � ; i i i � � � i� � � , �' I ! � , oc a�w urv. , � , , , � a.ao � s.ao� � i � x�ao� 'y �� { �� i.00 _ �$ � : . � , s.ao - �t - - t �� - - �-1 - �- � - - - -�1— - T—�- � —r -�� - T - c_ �� i d ' - �� -o��rtr�� ,�j � �, ti ti ti� i /� I � � oc.�v►�c.nuia w � � � � 1 ' ' ( V $ \ �.\ � ` '�` '• 1 �. Q. 'q t. � e. � 'J � ', ' Z � I � � .�..� . ..�..�..�..�..��?..�..�..�..�..�..�..�..�..�..�..�..—..�..�..�..�.._..�..�..�..�.. I . W � W � - - - - -.._..- - - - - - ! � i z � ��N�nON GRAPHIC SCALE • j ' � �� AIED OR�POURED STEEL-PLA1E CATCMBASINS SNALL NOT BE LE55 7MAN 10 �0��0�NOt� o I I I I �Z �� IN PLACE CAUCE 1N1H MQDED SEAMS 1M1H SIEEVES AT7ApIW FOR C� pwnwb In Pc.�E arws an!o (n�►ar) `•• ��c 1.CNanwb to A�th��am�matvlal at � 6• CONNECIINC 7HE STORM DRNN LINES. �a�a+� *'��ond eow. MVEitT OUT 2 Plp�Daekfll N al�D4e tom anw N W W 3/t'-0'w�AW rock 1 mee- zo tt J I � 3. AII matrldt, httdlatfon, tuSa and In tlon�!o b�muM in t61et SEE FLAN F'OR CATCMBASINS MADE OF CAST IRON SMALL MAVE A WALL �danp wkh Ck of tl StOndards�d CoMa =♦� o�m� 9g�El£VAnON 7MIdCNE55 OF N0T 1E55 1NAN t/4'M7M SLEEVES ATTACf1ED Caivin �res�yter�,en Chur_�a5�1.�0-J5.' S-'9-�� y� a� 1 � - Fpt CONNEC7INC fHE STORM DRAIN UNEA qc�= �/� 'o3°; 4• S1EEL CATCHBASMS SHALL SE ASPM/�LT COATED MSIDE!WL Vt �V�" OIL iRAP �ryq�7E�7�g�5�5 SHALL MAVE A WALL 71iIpCNESS Of�' 0 °"'E MAr 2000 WI1M CLEANWT .,. h BE REINfq2CED NITi ��.Z4�..� /4 BARS O E'o.C. NGIN SJ` W 12.8 0 �� S� 1'� 20' . na�vn ,ny C/"1/Vr1G1/'7�7fl� IrIC/lyq,. � .10e 00-057 A'V PAVED A�AS � �•,,� �T C1 �. N.T.S '� Q t �� ;� � � , �►�-}-- C�, - -- ------ _ �X �l , �:� ► � 7 _ �o�_o i ,� --,� - � �— Fi X t .� '� � ri �s P t tz� �. l� Pc M E. ___—} I 2� -� 20!(i" 20!b u ` 2��-0� � i ' . /"l FiX�6T ld_4. ..G�.�1.B�Ib� /' �; V' � . � � / ' �� ' - y.�.�_�_�_ � � � � . i . . . �� , . ' ' _Q I ��, � � I / . . � ' ' ` I ' ' � ' ' � � I � � / ,' �� ___ �/ � u� ao , u-+tsb 2 c�rr� 2 ��.nss� c.�.,1sr�4 '° ',.' --- � _ -- �o� ��r; Jy �,- __ - � - - c� . �-.-_� - �ro¢++[�. �• `a . =� 6P� .lrr4wJ�'Ot��. -i3i-- � -+-C�'--- � ---- ---- --- -Q aa �.9'+.J - L•4 F'� - --- � r o z ModlFf4t7101J�'j _ = i ' • °o � � �� f --�� ' � � ' � �4 --- —__ :---- - � II y N�V l6AJG.. i ':s�C�V7F(-(L I � ' VI � I . �- � MIJtLTif�fLPl9S� Gl.As6 S �OI Oi �� f"Ls2�N1 — ", - \o `�I � � -� N , IaT� t% ,�/� �/� � �. � � � -T� • �+-------- -iF -- -- -- ._ _ �!----- -- � '- FI�AL. ii �' cp I � � I —-- _�-#�;- = I J _ � U ;L.,w� a�= ' � � C�V � ' G.�t�sTlNGv' _Gt<A�.�6 l0 0 U L. N . �„� 1a �.�v��v�r.Xr I- ' � � � � I � � - -- � , u�/ � • U � c �;]t� ----- - � � " � U � �� _ �- ._ � � � 1ZriMoV�i F.kiSTi�.Ya � � � I up' °0 � � O O O W�wGON rtwp M�#, � NF�.�m�,��WCr_ i ir.�s-Citw NF�N�. .... � IN IO�fL�N-L.+ � I �2156a6 � . � . � � , � � � F��-' l�rL ��_ _ � Q � .r. _ � --- v� �}- � _ � � � - � � � � rL�Nlo.�� t'ck��tiYr `�� ._.,{__�Nt�v Wlrw, ^, _ . �� `�� b6YXL A�X? -. . � �_—rLEf�'16L11�. �'klSTi1.Y's , � � F- �Mf7. /tti�P Ft7w4iN.P'. \.\ .�y,� /�l n-_' \VAu... .4w�0� . NP v Ft,a�rt- � �. J �fV7 Cst22 �-{�V dVr�-fL ii�C��- ' �\ . 1 RE'FA4N�IN�+ ' - � Lsrator�� ' � -�� .��i w�. L�Ti�N �F � t�rL �vin� N�v ' � _ }1-4KG (ZtrC� � u • �,ti�t1NG.- 2h+IZ__ co��iNC. aa�rZ� 4-i-r. Fx�SrnNG f�d'�EA. �?�F?- -- I wku.. _ �ki��aCy . �,t�s�nY�. ——— -- ---I P.�l�-UUNG'�. GJIZ$, �Yhu L�-2 hr.7t7 �� `�,YiB'TINCa GGr�G. � II �v�-� ��Yn� \�/��T fbU�l�F�itJG II �A-S"T IyJV1LC71hSGv . 135s `"i � I I° -- �� PUSSfLt l.4E{+CR� �( Y,�..� . ::�Q: .,' I' ' `��BE,IIEVUE.WA �� . "r�F p� �� i� II U �i I_.o��/ �r� � L�o rt T`IZ Pt N 5 I T I o N I°L A. N • I I'�`�= f ' o�� ; - A 4 � il ��i!ED ��h,�b;f � CTS July 20, 2006 Project:M�H Sc�oq��e, Tigard Engineers CI�-Y iJF T r,�Rp oParatimmpany Ms. Kim McMillan �'LA�J,`jf�•�U;CiJGii�JEERING City of Tigard 13125 SW Hall Boulevard Tigard, OR 97223 Subje+d-: Sight Distanae at Propaseri MITCN Sd�oo!along SW 103°Avenue/SW Car�e�ury Lane I have conducted a study of available sight distance along SW 103�d Avenue and SW Canterbury Lane at the entrances to the existing church that will provide the site for the proposed MITCH School (one on SW 103�d and two on SW Canterbury). All three locations meet the Visual Clearance Area requirements in the Chapter 18.795 of the City's Development Code. Sight distance was also evaluated based on the City's Traffic Impact Study (TIS) Requirements. The TIS requirements call for minimum sight distance equal to 10 times the posted speed from driver's eye height of 3.5 feet to an object height of 4.25 feet, measured 15 feet back from the extended curb line or edge of pavement. (We also conducted measurements 10 feet back of the edge of pavement/extended curb line). The posted speed limit along SW 103ro Avenue is 35 mph, requiring 350 feet of sight distance. No posted speed was seen on SW Canterbury Lane, but as a residential street it was assumed to be 25 mph, corresponding to a requirement for 250 feet of sight distance. Results of the sight distance measurements are as follows: 1. Westemmost Canterbury Lane driveway (staff parking entrance� Sight distance {SD} to the east exceeds 250 feet. Clear SD to the intersection with Murdock, approximately 500 feet, could be provided by trimming one bush on the school grounds (photo #1) SD to the west is fimited to 190 feet. There is a bush at the base of a tree along the side of SW Canterbury Lane adjacent to the church. SD would be adequate if this bush is trimmed (photo #2). 2. Main Canterbury Lane drivewa� SD to the east is clear back to the intersection with SW 103`�Avenue {about i90 feet), where Canterbury ends (photo #3). SD to the west exceeds 250 feet, measured 10 feet back from the edge of curb (photo #4). (Unless noted, all measurements were taken 15 feet back from the edge of pavement/edge of curb) 3. 103�d Avenue drivewav: SD to the north is 245 feet measured from 15 feet back from the edge of pavement. However, it exceeds 250 feet measured from 12 feet or less (photos 20085 NW Tanasbourne Drive #5 and 6), which meets AASHTO standards. H;uSboro,oH 9��za P 503.690.8080 SD to the south is clear for 275 feet to the intersection with SW Canterbury F 503.645.5930 Lafle (phOtO #7). E hillsboro@ctsengineers.com www.ctsengi neers.com Based on our evaluation, sight distance at the site access points on SW Canterbury Lane and SW 103`�Avenue meets minimum sight distance requirements. H;�iS��o,oR 1 i I I a mook,OR Vaocouver,WA Bellevue,WA Coeur d'Alene,iD Sacramento,Cn Clermont,FL www.parat icom pa ny.com MITCH School Sight Distance Page 2 Ju/y 20, 2006 If you have any questions or need to discuss this matter further, please contact me directly at (503) 690-8080 ext. 1365 or hrollCa�ctsenqineers.com. Sincer ly, ��Ep P R OFFSS Howa d Roll, P.E. ��5 �NG�NEF,9 i02 Senior Transportation Planner Q 16 4 PE 9r Attachments c: Debi Lorence, MITCH Charter School vOy q�,�a�g`� �� Ed Murphy, LDC Design Group ti Q` y0 W AE�O EXPIRATION DATE:(L�I—'G� STUDY AREA TYPICAL VIEWS MITCH School Access Points Tigard,Oregon � � . : .:�. ♦ �' j�"•` ,,T..� '��'' :;:. ��_ � 2 ,y,",•,. �., r t � �i•.' - k L `�r�,s`` �, .,'• ,� 4�,� �•- ► �, -F".�',-`y�: "��t;. ��,�_��,w�r w.� .` , �,}l��.. „��a• ��':.,.,�v .:,o ;�'k T',j�`' ��1t�a ,". .� �r., ,r: 1,' -..� � 'S �,t"� r Z: � �� ""'i.-".i .'��'*y` `�' ,e :.y��.k�r�. �.°r��- ,;'Le�:.,Sa.!ts�s,,w.:3�r:�+�-r` #1: View EAST along Canterbury Lane from western site access (bush needs to be trimmed) y,�'�}w� t, ,�'�,y�� x � r r�.y�'•,, �� I +,. s� �� •^ 4, `_� � �. ��'� � .�_��L � .. �:{. �-.1�...� _ . '�,,,q.,. . '�'±�. '�" � � 'y) �4^�.-.. . T •(; .1, n.f.'F�� 'y�.�.:.. L . '� .. �+{ �. � • . '.. #2: View WEST along Canterbury Lane from western site access (bush needs to be trimmed) :r-a .� � � • , r�:� ..'�,k i � r '1 t�� ,.. ? _„�'`' } '�` ? �.:c : » .,��• ''� � ^ � �'-� l��,� ,. . � � �� -�.� :..�—..—--.. . +,�_,.�`.,•�dr�.�i'�'• �� . �` �' �� r �.� z.� ,,. �� ;�.' #3: View to EAST along Canterburn from main entrance (clear to intersection) Photos Taken 6y CTS Engineers,Page 1 STUDY AREA TYPICAL VIEWS MITCH School Access Points Tigard,Oregon � �Y, ...�� r i��F:;;*r.l�.��''�: � � p�� ' r 4 }�� '}� � C�t��,�" � . y v:y t y,~ ��n: \ •�� „ + �� ; _ • ' �j�d�� w � t A, i` � _ -0�� . �- � � F � , ��:�� s ^.�",..,��.�._.._ � .- �. ._ #4: View to WEST along Canterbury from main entry (> 250 ft 10'from edge of pavement) �� r.. �� < � �:� ��-- - � [{� � �,!'��S�,a� ,�,,. :�� .'"�`,x�a�,3Z�...� " y . �„�;� `� ,,� �"�r - ��„--�.,,�v��`� �{ .�f . � Yr+..� � t+` ;r.�1�'�'w.ska,� -s: #- ;:,.:;x _ . , ' ,�� , , i.� -,;-- . --� >.�,� ,� _ �. a f� W ;: _ , .�._ .. . �_ �"�'• _,�, 'a �' y:,�. `��!'�` �� ;,e:� ,-, . : �� .µ � �' '� `F{ r �w�� ,: #5: View to NORTH along 103`d from 15 ft back (approx. 245 ft) .,,�. , ^M � ~ ..t, t t ��. � A�� I I } .+1 I��I k. yy� �f _ � - Q ��;;�� _ f k ' , •�� j A� _ . x •F t. a � � � ��. _ � � ..C.y . - .. . �t!.',.:.5�. ^�• Y: � 'E4�i�n:..i.r. . - t ` •�} k'., - 1� 'Y!'-� . . " � . . . � l :.... .. � - ::�� . .: Ln'.p-..a � i Y � tf��.�; . .?.�� #6: View to NORTH along 103rd from 10 ft back (> 250 ft clear) Photos Taken by CT3 Engrneers,Page 2 STUDY AREA TYPICAL VIEWS MITCH School Access Points Tieard,Oregon �`� yi T- y . ' ,;^ .+� l� 1" � � � S Y �l .,;• �� K W .'t F f- f� _ ) . �tir _ � � `• .y. ��F�.; ai.+`` ,t. t � �: ��' � �. 'r:. '� . : � t'w .. �Z f�� ¢... -•��'�. �.�� -._ _ . /" � v►.��• yf' ..::w. 'i .J ...�`.-.. ' .�.: . �� -. f'1F�. �° � �` . ..t� . Y.�;:. .. .. �.'/C • T . '.� �:'�i i __ . � � �� ,<��i�� 'i '. :C ' . . - ' . ..� .��'� f` ti'� �y y��/� 14� 1 �� ._�; ti �'nt, ' �j 4. ' ,y' ;.:r< ,_ . � �;,� `-��+•,�q�i 7-� �;: ��i #7: View to SOUTH along 103�d from 15 (> 250 ft clear) Photos Taken by CTS Engineers,Page 3 . � �� ; � ,�� . PRE-APPLICATIDN �' CONFE RE NCE RE L��`�ED _ Q - 13125 SWHaII Bl7d, Ti�zrc� OR 97223�503�639-4171 FAX:(50��4�2�7 2OD6 CITY OF TIGARD � GENERAL INFORMATION PLANNINGlENGINEERING FOR STAFF USE ONLY ApPlicant�� C�f �/�� v � Address: � (�� f�(��( 2,3�75 Phone: G�/r�✓'�S� �e No.: t��-��lTd�o 'lJDl,�y Caty� ��3��. ��'� Zip: ��L�� Receipt No.• .�$a �v 3 3� Contact Pexson:��/ �(}/Zt-�l/C�- Phone: �3(��'�P� -�l�, APPlication Accepted By. � - (�L�-1 (�_ L�.S�G�t"'L (o ZS—�1� t� Date: tr(�IU�v Property Owner/Deed Holder(s): ��L�//�J �vZ��72f�� i�(� DATE OF PRE-APP.: �llt�0� l D��f S L'� TIME OF PRE-APP.: q - Address: (�'�-7'��one:�0 ;�2-7� � �,�J� �qn �� PRE-APP.HELD WITH �� "��f?��J � (/` ` Zip: �—� Rev.4/25/06 i:\curpin\masten\revised\Pre-AppRequest.doc ProperlyAddress/Location(s): `i1�1u� "` ��'J�� ('�r��UVJ}�!(�j(� G3�J^�L�3 REQUIRED SUBMITTAL ELEMENTS ��1/� ��n�' �O�L`��5�' (Note: applications will not be accepted � without the required submittal elements) Tax Map&Tax Lot#/(s�: ❑ Pre-Application Conf.Request Form zoning: 5 COPIES EACH OF THE FO T WIN • " ❑ Brief Description of the Proposal and any Site Size: Z� � � /L/ �f�Lt�ls �� `��ll� site-specific questions/issues that }�u would � L.��T like to have staff research prior to the PRE-APPLICATION CONFERENCE INFORMATION meeting. ❑ . Site .Plan. The site plan must show the �: � All of the infomzation identified on this form are required to be submitted by proposed lots and/or building layouu drawrr the applicant and received by the Planning Division a min�mum of one (11 to scale. ALso, show the location of the week �rior to officiallv scheduling a �re-a��lication conference date/time to subject property in relauon to the nearest allow staff ample time to prepare for the meeting. sueeu;and the locations of driveways on the subject property and across the street. A pre-application conference can usually be scheduled within 1-2 weeks of the � Vicinity Map. Planning Division's receipt of the request for either Tuesday or Thursda�• morrunes. Pre-applicauon conferences are one (i) hour long, and are rypically ❑ �e Proposed Uses. . held between the hours of 9:00-11:00 AM. ❑ Topographic Information. Include Contour PRE-APPLICATION CONFERENCES MUST BE SCHEDULED IN Lines if Possible. PERSON AT T'HE COMMiJNITY DEVELOPMENT CO[JNfER ❑ If the Pre-Application Conference is for a FROM 8:00-4:00/MONDAY-FRIDAY. MONOPOLE projecc, the applicant must attach a copy of the letter and proof in the IF MORE THAN 4 PEOPLE ARE EXPECTED TO ATT'END THE form of an affidavit of mailing, that the PRE-APPLICATION CONFERENCE IN YOUR GROLJI', PLEASE collocation protocol was completed (see INFORM THE CITY IN ADVANCE SO THAT ALTERNATE ROOM Section 18.798.080 of the Tigard Community ARRANGEMENTS CAN BE MADE TO ACCOMMODATE ?HE Development Code). GROUP. ❑ Filing Fee$351.00 Lc.�e D. Weislogel Chair,Board of Directors •T' MITCH SCHOOLS � � TiQard-Tualatin PO Box 230575 I � r y Tigard,OR 97281 �. � 503 639-5757 'R r f R �� Sherwood PO Box 1342 23264 SW Main St. Multi-sensory Inswuion S}►CTwOOd,OR 97140 Tcachme Chddren HanAs-on : $�3 925-g��7 � �� ,/,' www.mitchcharterschool.org Y � JulyQ006 Augus12006 3 M T W T F S S M T W T F S 30 31 1 1 2 3 4 5 2 3 4 5 �6 7 8 6 7 9 9 10 11 12 9 10 11 12 13 14 75 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 20 27 22 23 24 25 26 zs za zs ss z� za zs Thursday, ,luly 06, 2006 2' 28 29 30 3' -Pre-A s CD Meetin s Early 8:00 AM 9:00 AM (9:00 AM - 10:00 AM) M.I.T.C.H -CALVIN PRES CHURCH 10:00 AM (10:00 AM- 11:00 AM) Pre-App (Mildren Design Dan Vasquez 1S136DC-04300/04402 72nd & Dartmouth 2 story office bldg.) 11:00 AM 12:00 PM 1:00 PM 2:00 PM 3:00 PM 4:00 PM Late Tasks Notes Kristie Peerman � fi�2qn�nF-�n�ann . � ' i � � � • • � � ......... Q v � � .......... .......................................... � �Q a � Multi-sensory Instruction Teaching � o _ z � � � a � ro T �„ �,.; a E � • � Children Hands-on � � � ................................... � � � � • • � �, � '�e mission of M.I.T.C.H.is to use �� '�� rnmonly shared knowledge to ' � � ;ild the foundation �or education �`' here all students leam the critical (l J ements o f reading, writrng and 'Si � � th�nking skilis. '�� '�'`.� � �, � ,�� These educational concepts are �E R 5 � based upon the Core Knowledge � Sequence curriculum obtamed from Average of 22 students per eiass grurle-by , �ide se��.��nce of speci�c content in all c�z� :;�_. �iemics—leaming bu�lds upon learnin�;. � ��'ti�� , �.� �`� �, Additional Op�ortunities • ' ...........................e...,,�....................._ �= •, ,, �'� � - �,�°�_ • Friday Enrichment � � � Programs ��s� -�� +�I ' � � ' �,� � . � • Seasonal/Summer *' 'r � ' <. �. � � ;m M .�,.� ,�; �`. Camps � ' " " ,�. = . �.. F,,: , .�� {" � � , , ... . •Tutoring � f " �� _ __� � . g� - — ` � � T-, �"� � � School Hours ` � �� .:� �e "�' � "'� _ r'�� , I tiK � Monday -Thursday ' `� ~ ` 8 a.m.- 3:30 p.m. � o . � �• Contact � f � � � �;� �:` „ . � In formation I!-= � �`_ .'� � o i�= �� i„ � v � MJ.T.C.H. Charter School s � � � s �t" PO Box 230575,Tigard, Oregon 97281-0575 U � °` �� Telephone:503-639-5757 2 X O � ' �_ ,� email:mitch@mitchcharterschool.org � m � - � Y Vrsit us online at: www.mitchcharterschool.or g — � r � a � 1 , � � 1 .,� ' A � '' � � �, ,� � � ��,,: . �., NOTICE OF NOf,f?I�CRIMINATORY POLICY AS TO STUDENTS -� � �'�R ��_.�M, The Multi-sensory i� . �ction Teaching Children Hands-on (M.I.T.CH.) � ' � C'harter Pubiic School ,�dmits students of any race,color,national and � ` � t t;��' �''� ethnic origin to all the�ights.privileges,programs,and activities gener- � �� , �� . ally accorded or made available to students at M.I.T.CH. Charter � , Q ' � . _ � � School.It does not discrirr,;nate on the basis of race,color,national and • � w ethnic origin in adminisU ��:?n of its educational policies, admissions � policies,scholarship and Ic�: pro�rams,and athlet�c and other school- �� 1,P . - - . . . - administered programs.A! _ u ollment by lotter y. c � - � - � - . . � " • • � � ' � � • ' .. ............ ......o... �� RIggS L�]I1gUC1ge/41'tS COf e KIIOW�@dg@ �math�sciencee��n core acad mic suL��, �I�nguage arts, � � ....................................................... .................................................. ory,and fine arts). .. � ��, The Riggs Institute's language arts method,The Writin; !} The Core Knowledge Sequence curriculum is � • Developing mufti-sensory learning � and Spelling Road to Readin� and Thinking, integrates recognized by the American Federation of �, and finely sequences all — -- -��,� Teachers and is a model school reform program.CKS has a strategies with each student. --. of the"strands"of English:letter , fi . � ``�4 multicultural emphasis and high levels of academic expectation. • Learning through the outside envir-on ��M � v formation,penmanshlp,spelling '' CKS provides a detailed outline of knowledge and competen- ment;using meaningful methods to - r (with complete"explicit"phonics ' cies children K-8 need in order to build a solic,c oherent foun- �� ennth the cu!r�cula,induding agricul- ,. and 47 rules),composition, read : `�` ? • dation for higher learning, turai and environmental awareness. ing,vocabulary,and grammar � `- through four avenues to the � TI11S �u1'1'ICUIum S�eCi flCally C1dd1'esses: • I ,t,3blishing self-discipline and high levels of personal mind.With multi-sensory (for all '��m` __ � responsi bility an d respect in a secure learning environment. learning styles),direct and ° _ � •work / Study Habits � �', Socratic instruction,the program is taught ti�rough sight,sound, •Autonomy & Soaal Skills s �, ' • Fostering self-worth and an appreciation of unique qualities voice and writing.This offers an EQUAL and OPTIMAL educa- • Motor Skills ,"��:, �� i° within others. tional opportunity for each student. • Mathematical Reasoning 1 • Creating a school culture in which parents and community & Number Sense > ` The curriculum is based on the work of Dr.Samuel T.Orton r' members feel welcome and needcd. (a neuropathologist) and the experience of master teachers • Orientation in Time `; ;:� • 5cientific Reasoning ,,��' ......... .:................................................. such as Romalda Spalding and Oma Riggs.The Riggs program �r'� � � � Unique Qual�ties o f M.�.T C �"'� . . . produces superb results by helping children learn the right • Physical World � ,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,, material,in the right order,in the right way. • Music � • Monday thru Thursday •Arts �"'' • 8:OOam-3:30pm Schedule � "An equal optimum educational opportunity through • � "� °°� „ • History& Geography � ► __ • Spanish, Art,Music,PE & Health � �' � '`= multi-sensory language arts.... � For more in ormotion lease visit online at www.mreknowled e or ' Multiple Instructional Strategies ` '� Myrna McCulloch,Founder& Director,Riggs Institute f p g � g ., : •Agriculture in the Classroom + , � For more in formation about Riggs pleose coll the Institute directly "Knowledge makes people competent regardless 0 f • Higher Academic Standards �� ' '�`�,..�,..d : at (503) 574-2691 or visit them online at www.riggsinst.org race, dass or ethnicit . Knowled e is the reat social . �- , `�f� ................................................................ Y g g Non-profit 501(C)3 equalizer.' Saxon Math � Core Knowled e Seienee sc ,J ut o & o de Core Knowledge �, - --- , .�-- g E.D.Hir h r.,A h r F un r, .... .................................................. �� . ...... _ To ensure a complete ,............................................ s ��, �. . � . ` � �, , - � � - � program for your --- � "M.I.T.C.H. Char-ter' School's job is ��* �' �" �y � , ' �., , � ``� . ch��d,M.�.TC.H. to educate the whole child. By giv- � ��'' �'— ��' Charter School also � { �� , ~ � ing children a solid foundation o f ��; , ,� �, : , ;� ' ��corporates saXOr, ��! educotional truths, teaching them 1 � ��! � � . � !" ' f �. Math and Core " � ' � Kr,oW�edge Sc�er,ce =.� � �� to think, stretching their com forts � �� -� � for growth, and partnering with - °� �- �,. _ ` into its curriculum. �� t ' � parents who share the same ! , !� �' � � � �� vision, we will educate children to become great � �� `� �- -'�� , ? � , ' � , „ , � �� leaders in our community and nation. � � ,,4,,, ; � � � . . � �� F��r n�ore in�orrnat�on plec,se visit wwwsaxonpublishers.com or Debi Lorence,Founder and Principal, M.LT,C.H.Charter School �� --' www.coreknowledge.org online. �---- �� - —L MITCH Charter School Proposal To Locate at Calvin Presb_yterian Church June 30, 2006 INDEX 1. Pre-Application Conference Request (Form Attached) 2. Brief Description of Proposal 3. Site Plan (Attached) 4. The Proposed Use 5. Other Attachments a. Building Usage Layout b. MITCH Brochure 2. BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF PROPOSAL MTI'CH Charter School proposes to relocate the K-8 MITCH Tigard-Tualatin School within the Calvin Presbyterian Church in Tigard beginning fa112006. By making use of space available at the church, the school can become a tenant which holds benefits for the two (2) parties and the community at large. The MTTCH School is a school of choice that operates under a contract with the Tigard-Tualatin School District. 3. SITE PLAN (See Attached) 4. THE PROPOSED USES MTTCH Tigard-Tualatin proposes carrying out its educational program at the Calvin Presbyterian Church on SW Canterbury Lane. The grade levels, K-8, have an average of 22 students per class. Classes are held in a four (4) day week, Monday through Thursday, 8:00 AM—3:30 PM. MTTCH provides a rigorous basic curriculum that also includes art, music, and PE. Teachers are specially trained to help students reach high achievement goals. Students arrive by car pooling without buses. The office for the school is at an offsite location in Tigard. The church facility and property provide ample space to carry out MITCH objectives, including signi�cant parking and access. See Attached building layout for specific usage by the school. The school has operated successfully at previous locations within the school district, namely, First Baptist Church (Gaarde Ave., Tigard), Old Tualatin Elementary School (Boones Ferry, Tualatin), and the Tigard High School modulars (Durham Rd., Tigard). The MITCH School would be using existing classrooms and space in a facility built for such purposes. The communication between the school and church will be a priority to ensure effective day-to-day coordination. For more detail, see the Attached MITCH brochure. CITY OF TIGARD PLANNING DIVISION/COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT � om or rw�ro ioa:a .+a.. .ee�t�.ti t--. —_-� 1� ._._—_'_.. 'J8M 1 �00 �aOU i I i -- T= �.o� � �wno I _ �.�a� �� j_�ffi3—____� (Y-.�_`�� -_�__�_`�� P.�I�YT�' .. �_��_��-i�.� ��.�� Y— . 1 �^'M 0 � f/ }J A,DET�✓Y01.� }✓( t � � Fu�.rtf � '4� t� r S+�b'rw4 a'L.JW'N C/�rt6�M+R 'O� I Nuv c.,2b�.n�o�creE GtM�.�G v.uv1�C Gt�6Tww m R M�WR I � I— Gn�uEIJM � � P��'D�Ed.� KuD CJDA2��H.+�6 1 _ , c.+R.o�ns.—_..xr _____'—'_"..'_" '____ \ i � p \ �.� '.�I _ _ .O O �Q '� 1 � . .. . `p I � �� I I . I 'i .- . li ' j . ' - ___._._..... _ I i i . K+j l � i I I .r I �I rl�� = I I ' � ;, ! li _ i'I,.i i 5,.�.�.e�a. -- _ - .I er�..� a r�.,x� �� I � ��i,� � �..� , P�rs..��V �, ��I I�I I Ili�� 'i �� a:ra+cu.o - - - - I :o'o c.,an a,irCaR � � 1 : I�' �� '�illil ;I'I r = 9 a ,�..,� I �i � I�.I�II ' ' NWI ,wb� I � II.I I i I I - .i'3 oM�R� � � i � �I II I � � �,I 2�'4e.u!'S • "" �[. .� . � _ _ �1 R�O'b'� _ . ! ' 6 T I I II�I�I �i I I�II' - ... _Q� `-'�i��`PMfO ji � 1 I "_ : . .. �, I �� • III I I I I , � . �'I I I I I �I I' _ ..._.. ..__ " — ; I lw.�^� " ^ I i — i�II I ��Pl 'C� Flwi��2�G'C6 L-1 rAZ��Vi 1sT- .I , I3�M�1'nb IIIC�S � LIW��T.JP• � �I n�� _'_ _ - ,��.�,., _.� ,;� , � �— __- i - --- I — _= r r i ~ _.� `--� �� n r ; " I I' � �� r r:�}'\ �/% �\\ j -� � _ � !i/' /' \� \�\ I A � ,��//� .;��;\i / � \\�\��\\�� E3 bTu,1Ca CM.N�1 � ' O \\ _C�+/RGN A�LLOI!+6 � � �� li I��,� �'4� �� I � ! `� ��\�� '�,� (�e roz�.�.� � -�9�00 '�., � � �' ��'' ��`�\�� ?!� ,/,' � ��9et � .,� ��'� ./�� \�`\\ .�i�i�%/ I. ' �Y�. \: � _��: � \��\\ _/�� y .I � ' /' 2xCYS�J6 -� � �� __ �\�_ -�/% ' i N j t -__ �� — � . ' vRf�ti*�r _ II � . __ \ .. -- /' � -. �" i ; Q LRTK�a1.� / MC�✓N I �� , 1 J� t�l�(I�Y p �� , I ' \ `�,..�c�.,) `'.r i i %�'1 � e I � _.� . � � -----�--- �-- — �--_; , � -----_ _ — ---- - —_��' , . , _ — — -- . _ ; � ----- 1f.ltieT�u4 b7i9- b� �. CMVGVMI� ..-t .___'�"' _'_"__"_"_'___. --�-- -- I`10 I�'f H or�.. �� —--°----. __--- � ----- -----•------ - ----.. _---------- -- ---.' � S, \�/. G/.NTL2l�u,2Y L.4Nf� . �I'T� PLA r! • I�RDI°oS�D At7bT�f 101� • I�� 2o I � �ITY OF TIGARD � CALVIN PRESBYTERIAN CHURCH ADDITION SITE P�.AN � (CUP)2000-00002 (Map is not to scale) _____________________________________ ' � PRE-AP�LICATION CONFERENCE NOTES , M ➢ ENGINEERING SECTIOH \ CilyofTlgard,Orcgon Community�DeveCopment S � A�ttc►'Con� PUBLIC FACILITIES Tax Map[sl: 2s�»B� Tax lot[al: 2800 Use i�pe: CUP The extent of necessary public improvements and dedications which shall be required of the applicant will be recommended by City staff and subject to approval by the appropriate authority. There will be no final recommendation to the decision making authority on behalf of the City staff until all concerned commenting agencies, City staff and the public have had an opportunity to review and comment on the application. The following comments are a projection of public improvement related requirements that may be required as a condition of development approval for your proposed project. Riqht-of-wav dedication: The City of Tigard requires that land area be dedicated to the public: (1.) To increase abutting public rights-of-way to the ultimate functional street classification right-of-way width as specified by the Community Development Code; or (2.) For the creation of new streets. Approval of a development application for this site will require right-of-way dedication for: � SW 103�d Avenue to 27 feet from centerline ❑ SW to feet ❑ SW to feet ❑ SW to feet Street improvements: � Half street improvements will be necessary along SW 103`d Avenue, to include: � 16 feet of pavement from centerline � concrete curb � storm sewers and other underground utilities � 5-foot concrete sidewalk with 5 foot planter strip � street trees sized and spaced per TDC � street signs, traffic control devices, streetlights and a two-year streetlight fee. ❑ Other: CITY OF TI6ARD Pre-Applicatlon Conference No[es Page 1 of 6 Eagineeriag oeputmeot SecUoo ❑ street improvements will be necessary along SW , to include: ❑ feet of pavement ❑ concrete curb ❑ storm sewers and other underground utilities ❑ -foot concrete sidewalk ❑ street trees ❑ street signs, traffic control devices, streetlights and a finro-year streetlight fee. ❑ Other: ❑ street improvements will be necessary along SW , to include: ❑ feet of pavement ❑ concrete curb ❑ storm sewers and other underground utilities ❑ -foot concrete sidewafk ❑ street trees ❑ street signs, traffic control devices, streetlights and a two-year streetlight fee. ❑ Other: ❑ street improvements will be necessary along SW , to include: ❑ feet of pavement ❑ concrete curb ❑ storm sewers and other underground utilities ❑ -foot concrete sidewalk ❑ street trees ❑ street signs, traffic control devices, streetlights and a two-year streetlight fee. ❑ Other: ❑ street improvements will be necessary along SW , to include: ❑ feet of pavement ❑ concrete curb ❑ storm sewers and other underground utilities ❑ -foot concrete sidewalk ❑ street trees ❑ street signs, traffic control devices, streetlights and a two-year streetlight fee. CITY OF TIGARD Pre-Applicadon Conference No[es Page 2 of 6 Englnaering Uepar[ment Sectlor ❑ Other: Aqreement for Future Street Improvements: In some cases, where street improvements or other necessary public improvements are not currently practical, the improvements may be deferred. In such cases, a condition of development approval may be specified which requires the property owner(s) to provide a future improvement guarantee. The City Engineer will determine the form of this guarantee. The following street improvements may be eligible for such a future improvement guarantee: (1.) �2.) Overhead Utilitv Lines: � Section 18.810.120 of the Tigard Municipal Code (TMC) requires all overhead utility lines adjacent to a development to be placed underground or, at the election of the developer, a fee in-lieu of undergrounding can be paid. This requirement is valid even if the utility lines are on the opposite side of the street from the site. If the fee in-lieu is proposed, it is equal to $ 35.00 per lineal foot of street frontage that contains the overhead lines. There are existing overhead utility lines which run adjacent to this site along SW 103rd Avenue. Prior to final inspection, the applicant shall either place these utilities underground, or pay the fee in-lieu described above. Sanitary Sewers: The nearest sanitary sewer line to this property is a(n) 8 inch line which is located in 103�d Avenue. The proposed development must be connected to a public sanitary sewer. It is the developer's responsibility to connect to the public sewer. Water Supply: The Citv of Tigard (Phone:(503) 639-4171 provides public water service in the area of this site. This service provider should be contacted for information regarding water supply for your proposed development. Fire Protection: Tualatin Valley Fire and Rescue District (South Division) [Contact: John Dalby, (503) 356-4723] provides fire protection services within the City of Tigard. The District should be contacted for information regarding the adequacy of circulation systems, the need for fire hydrants, or other questions related to fire protection. Storm Sewer Improvements: All proposed development within the City shall be designed such that storm water runoff is conveyed to an approved public drainage system. The applicant will be required to submit a proposed storm CITY OF TICARD Pre-Applicatlon Cenference Notes Page 3 of 6 EoglneeHng Oepartmea[Saetloa drainage plan for the site, and may be required to prepare a sub-hasin drainage analysis to ensure . that the proposed system w ;commodate runoff from upstream perties when fully developed. Detention is required if net, new impervious surface area exceeds 5000 square feet. Storm Water Quality: The City has agreed to enforce Surface Water Management (SWM) regulations established by the Unified Sewerage Agency (USA) (Resolution and Order No. 00-7) which requires the construction of on-site water quality facilities. The facilities shall be designed to remove 65 percent of the phosphorus contained in 100 percent of the storm water runoff generated from impervious surfaces. The resolution contains a provision that would allow an applicant to pay a fee in-lieu of constructing an on- site facility provided specific criteria are met. The City will use discretion in determining whether or not the fee in-lieu will be offered. If the fee is allowed, it will be based upon the amount of impervious surfaces created; for every 2,640 square feet, or portion thereof, the fee shall be $210. Preliminary sizing calculations for any proposed water quality facility shall be submitted with the development application. It is anticipated that this project will require: � Construction of an on-site water quality facility. ❑ Payment of the fee in-lieu. Water quality treatment is required if you disturb the site (development). This does not include interior remodel work. Other Comments: All proposed sanitary sewer and storm drainage systems shall be designed such that City maintenance vehicles will have unobstructed access to critical manholes in the systems. Maintenance access roadways may be required if existing or proposed facilities are not otherwise readily accessible. TRAFFIC IMPACT FEES In 1990, Washington County adopted a county-wide Traffic Impact Fee (TIF) ordinance. The Traffic Impact Fee program collects fees from new development based on the development's projected impact upon the City's transportation system. The applicant shall be required to pay a fee based upon the number of trips which are projected to result from the proposed development. The calculation of the TIF is based on the proposed use of the land, the size of the project, and a general use based fee category. The TIF shall be calculated at the time of buildinq permit issuance. In limited circumstances, payment of the TIF inay be allowed to be deferred until the issuance of an occupancy permit. Deferral of the payment until occupancy is permissible o� when the TIF is greater than $5,000.00. Pay the TlF. CfT1f OF TI6ARD Pre-Applicatlon Conference Motes Page 4 of 6 Eall�serl�!�spartment SecUoa PERMITS, Public Facilitv Improvement (PFI) Permit: Any work within a public right-of-way in the City of Tigard requires a PFI permit from the Engineering Department. A PFI permit application is available at the Planning/Engineering counter in City Hall. For more extensive work such as street widening improvements, main utility line extensions or subdivision infrastructure, plans prepared by a registered professional engineer must be submitted for review and approval. The Engineering Department fee structure for this permit is considered a cost recovery system. A deposit is collected with the application, and the City will track its costs throughout the life of the permit, and will either refund any remaining portion of the deposit, or invoice the Permittee in cases where City costs exceeds the deposit amount. NOTE: Engineering Staff time will also be tracked for any final design-related assistance provided to a Permittee or their engineer prior to submittal of a PFI permit application. This time will be considered part of the administration of the eventual PFI permit. The Permittee will also be required to post a perFormance bond, or other such suitable security. Where professional engineered plans are required, the Permittee must execute a Developer/Engineer Agreement, which will obligate the design engineer to perform the primary inspection of the public improvement construction work. The PFI permit fee structure is as follows: NOTE: If an PFI Permit is required,the applicant must obtain that permit prior to release of any permits from the Building Diuision. Buildinq Division Permits: The following is a brief overview of the type of permits issued by the Building Division. For a more detailed explanation of these permits, please contact the Development Services Counter at 503-639-4171, ext. 304. Site Improvement Permit (SIT). This permit is generally issued for all new commercial, industrial and multi-family projects. This permit will also be required for land partitions where lot grading and private utility work is required. This permit covers all on-site preparation, grading and utility work. Home builders will also be required to obtain a SIT permit for grading work in cases where the lot they are working on has slopes in excess of 20% and foundation excavation material is not to be hauled from the site. Building Permit (BUP). This permit covers only the construction of the building and is issued after, or concurrently with, the SIT permit. Master Permit (MST). This permit is issued for all single and multi-family buildings. It covers all work necessary for building construction, including sub-trades (excludes grading, etc.). This permit can not be issued in a subdivision until the public improvements are substantially complete and a mylar copy of the recorded plat has been returned by the applicant to the City. For a land partition, the applicant must obtain an Engineering Permit, if required, and return a mylar copy of the recorded plat to the City prior to issuance of this permit. Other Permits. There are other special permits, such as mechanical, electrical and plumbing that may also be required. Contact the Development Services Counter for more information. CITY OF TIGARD Pre-Applicabon Conference Notes Page 5 of 6 Epglneerla9�eparuosntSeeUeo � GRA�ING PLAN REQUIREMENTS FOR SUBDIVISIONS All subdivision projects shall require a proposed grading plan prepared by the design engineer. The engineer will also be required to indicate which lots have natural slopes between 10% and 20%, as well as lots that have natural slopes in excess of 20%. This information will be necessary in determining if special grading inspections will be required when the lots develop. The design engineer will also be required to shade all structural fill areas on the construction plans. In addition, each homebuilder will be required to submit a specific site and floor plan for each lot. The site plan shall include topographical contours and indicate the elevations of the corners of the lot. The builder shall also indicate the proposed elevations at the four corners of the building. PREPARED BY: �Il�---- - 7 ' � ' a ENGINEERI D PARTMENT STAFF DATE Phone: [5031639-41T1 Fax: [5031624-0)52 document2 Revised: September 2, 2003 CITY OF TIGAR� Pre-Applicatlon Conference Notes Page 6 of 6 Enllneering�epartmenl Sectloe � I ♦ t,� TY OF TIGARD P R E-A P P ll CAT I 0 N CO N f E R E N C E N OT E S Communify•Dec�eCoprrsenf S(raping�l BetterCommunity (Pre-Application Meeting Notes are Yalid for Six (6) Months) _ __ _.—- _ ; Fi�n�IG o� ' (o ZOG �o _ ��F/�a� �'t'__ KS 11� , 1 J � NON-RESIDENTIAL . _ � �� APPUCANT: Y`1 t T�C,N C'(�.a.�{� �� I AGENT: Q�6 °- �ol 4 (o Phone: (S�?l (h'��, - � `15 7 . Le c ' � �ZS- l2d PROPERTY LOCATION: ADDRESS/GENERAL LOUITION: � C�y-�-{�S S�1 C�e-v�4-e�bu.c � � vi e TAX MAP(S)/LOT #(S): � I ( 13 L O $�v NECESSARY APPLICATIONS: C' �P - C��t�' ct US.� r w..�f ✓I.[ `F,� a.Pti' -!r� � PROPOSAL DESCRIPTION: r`�i c.-s�..�9�� L--$ 5�� cia ssro� S��.t�t.� i.�/i.., �-Iti.e C�xQ�s-ir. �.t.�s�.,4-�t.:a�- - �'ln u..c.►.-, r r�Fr COMPREHENSIVE PLAN MAP DESIGNATION: l.e� - a.r�.v�.s��-�, 2e1.��h�q � ZONING MAP DESIGNATION: � - 3 •S tOMIN6 DISI'RICT DIMENSI01lAL REQUIREMENTS (R�f�r U C�d�S�ctl�a 1�. s�U��1 MINIMUM LOT SIZE:�,i,1D"v sq. ft. Average Min. lot width:� 5 ft. Max. building height:3 G ft. Seri�dc� Front�ft. Side � ft. Rear�ft. Comer�ft. from street. MAXIMUM SITE COVERAGE: _�% Minimum landscaped or natural vegetation area: � %. NEI6HBORNOOD MEE11M6 [Refer ta th�Meighb�rhead Me�dng Nandeutl THE APPLICANT SHALL NOTIFY ALL PROPERTY OWNERS WITHIN 500 FEET, INTERESTED PARTIES, AND THE CITY OF TIGARD PLANNING DIVISION of their proposal. A minimum of two (2) weeks between the mailing date and the meeting date is required. Please review the Land Use Notification handout concerning site posting and the meeting notice. Meeting is to be held prior to submittinq vour application or the application will not be accepted. ` NOTE: In order to also preliminarily address building code standards, a meeting with a Plans Examiner is encouraged prior to submittal of a land use application. CITY OF TIGARD Pre-Applicabon Conference Notes Page 1 of 8 NON-Res�denbal ApplicatioNPlanning Divislon Sectioo , � [�NARkAT1YE tRefer to Cede Chal 18.3901 The APPLICANT SHALL SUBMIT A NARRATIVE which provides findings based on the applicable approval standards. Failure to provide a narrative or adequately address criteria would be reason to consider an application incomplete and delay review of the proposal. The applicant should review the code for applicable criteria. �MPACT STUDY [R�fer to Cod�S�cdons 18.390.040 and 18.390.0501 As a part of the APPLICATION SUBMITTAL REQUIREMENTS, applicants are required to INCLUDE IMPACT STUDY with their submittal package. The impact study shall quantify the effect of the development on public facilities and services. The study shall address, at a minimum, the transportation system, including bikeways, the drainage system, the parks system, the water system, the sewer system and the noise impacts of the development. For each public facility system and type of impact, the study shall propose improvements necessary to meet City standards, and to minimize the impact of the development on the public at larg e, public facilities systems, and affected private property users. In situations where the Community Development Code requires the dedication of real property interests, the applicant shall either specfically concur with the dedication requirement, or provide evidence which supports the conclusion that the real property dedication reqwrement is not roughly proportional to the projected impacts of the development. �CCESS [Ref�r te Chapters 18J05 and 18.7651 �- �`�"� �� U 3 - 3 Minimum number of accesses: Minimum access width: Minimum pavement width: All driveways and parking areas, except for some fleet storage parking areas, must be paved. Drive-in use queuing areas: �ALKWAY REQ8IREMEMTS [Ref�r t�C�d�Secdon 18.705.0301 WALKWAYS SHALL EXTEND FROM THE GROUND FLOOR ENTRANCES OR FROM THE GROUND FLOOR LANDING OF STAIRS, ramps, or elevators of all commercial, institutional, and industrial uses, to the streets which provide the required access and egress. Walkways shall provide convenient connections between buildings in multi-building commercial, institutional, and industrial complexes. Unless impractical, walkways should be constructed befinreen a new development and neighboring developments. ❑ SPECUIL SETBACKS [Refer b C•��eaa�r�g.7301 > STREETS: feet from the centerline of � LOWER INTENSITY ZONES: feet, along the site's boundary. > FLAG LOT: 10-FOOT SIDE YARD SETBACK. ❑ SPECIAL BOILDIM6 NEI6NT PROYISIONS [Ref�r to Cod�S�ctl�n 18.730.010.BJ BUILDING HEIGHT EXCEPTIONS - Buildings located in a non-residential zone may be built to a height of 75 feet provided that: > A maximum building floor area to site area ratio (FAR) of 1.5 to 1 will exist; > All actual building setbacks will be at least half ('/z) of the building's height; and � The structure will not abut a residential zoned district. �BUFFERIM6 AMD SCREENIN6 [R�f�r ta Cod�Cdapt�r 18.7451 In order TO INCREASE PRIVACY AND TO EITHER REDUCE OR ELIMINATE ADVERSE NOISE OR VISUAL IMPACTS between adjacent developments, especially between different land uses, the City requires landscaped buffer areas along certain site perimeters. Required buffer areas are described by the Code in terms of width. Buffer areas must be occupied by a mixture of deciduous and evergreen trees and shrubs and must also achieve a balance between vertical and horizontal plantings. Site obscuring screens or fences may also be required; these are often advisable even if not required by the Code. The required buffer areas may o� be occupied by vegetation, fences, utilities, and walkways. Additional information on required buffer area materials and sizes may be found in the Development Code. CITY OF TIGARD Pre-Application Conference Notes Page 2 of 8 NON-ReSidenOal Appl�cffiion/Planning Division Sectwn The ESTIMATED REQUIR� 3UFFER WIDTHS applicable to you, rroposal area are: feet along north boundary. feet along east boundary. feet along south boundary. feet along west boundary. IN ADDITION, SIGHT OBSCURING SCREENING IS REQUIRED ALONG: �LANDSCAPIN6 [Refer to Cede C6apt�rs 18.745.18.765 and 18.7051 STREET TREES ARE REQUIRED FOR ALL DEVELOPMENTS FRONTING ON A PUBLIC OR PRIVATE STREET as weli as driveways which are more than 100 feet in length. Street trees must be placed either within the public right-of-way or on private property within six (6) feet of the right-of- way boundary. Street trees must have a minimum caliper of at least two (2) inches when measured four (4) feet above grade. Street trees should be spaced 20 to 40 feet apart depending on the branching width of the proposed tree species at matunty. Further infoRnation on regulations affecting street trees may be obtained from the Planning Division. A MINIMUM OF ONE (1) TREE FOR EVERY SEVEN (7) PARKING SPACES MUST BE PLANTED in and around all parking areas in order to provide a vegetative canopy effect. Landscaped parking areas shall include special design features which effectively screen the parking lot areas from view. These design features may include the use of landscaped berms, decorative walls, and raised planters. [�RECYCLIM6 [Ref�r to Cod�Chapt�r 18.7551 Applicant should CONTACT FRANCHISE HAULER FOR REVIEW AND APPROVAL OF SITE SERVtCING COMPATIBILITY. Locating a trash/recycling enclosure within a clear vision area such as at the intersection of two (2) driveways within a parking lot is prohibited. Much of Tigard is within Pride Disposal's Service area. Lenny Hing is the contact person and can be reached at (503) 625-6177. [�PARION6 [R�fer u Ced�S�cU�a 1i.165.04A1 - _ L ��,,�,,,r,� REQUIRED parkin g for this t y pe of use:�--� � / � Parking SHOWN on preliminary plan(s): �^ SECONDARY USE REQUIRED parking: �� - 1 p� S srKdQ..��/sr�f�- �arking SHOWN on preliminary plan(s): � � �� 3 j�+n K��•�� a � � NO MORE THAN 50% OF REQUIRED SPACES MAY BE DESIGNATED AND/OR DIMENSIONED AS COMPACT SPACES. PARKING STALLS shall be dimensioned as follows: � Standard parking space dimensions: 8 feet, 6 inches x 18 feet, 6 inches. � Compact parking space dimensions: 7 feet, 6 inches x 16 feet, 6 inches. Note: Parking space width includes the width of a stripe that separates the parking space from an adjoining space. Note: A maximum of three (3)feet of the vehicle overhang area in front of a wheel stop or curb can be included as part of required parking space depth. This area cannot be included as landscaping for meeting the minimum percentage requirements. HANDICAPPED PARKING: > All parking areas shall PROVIDE APPROPRIATELY LOCATED AND DIMENSIONED DISABLED PERSON PARKING spaces. The minimum number of disabled person parking spaces to be provided, as well as the parking stall dimensions, are mandated by the Americans with Disabilities Act (ADA). A handout is available upon request. A handicapped parking space symbol shall be painted on the par-king space surface and an appropriate sign shall be posted. > BICYCLE RACKS ARE REQUIRED FOR MULTI-FAMILY, COMMERCIAL AND INDUSTRIAL DEVELOPMENTS. Bicycle racks shall be located in areas protected from automobile traffic and in convenient locations. [�' LOADIN6 AREA REQUIREMEMTS [Ref�r to Ced�Sectlon 18.765.0801 �� r��t�� Every COMMERCIAL OR INDUSTRIAL BUILDING IN EXCESS OF 10,000 SQUARE FEET shall be provided with a loading space. The space size and location shall be as approved by the City Engineer. CITY OF TIGARD Pre-Applica6on Conference Notes Page 3 of 8 NON-Residential Applicalion/Planning Drvision Section � [�BICY�LE RACKS [R�fer to Code lan 18.7651 S� 7 a.G�-(.e r• 7 6 S. � BICYCLE RACKS are required FOR MULTI-FAMILY, COMMERCIAL AND INDUSTRIAL DEVELOPMENTS. Bicycle racks shall be located in areas protected from automobile traffic and in convenient locations. ❑ SENSITIYE LANDS [Refer to Cod�Chapt�r 18.7T51 The Code provides REGULATIONS FOR LANDS WHICH ARE POTENTIALLY UNSUITABLE FOR DEVELOPMENT DUE TO AREAS WITHIN THE 100-YEAR FLOODPLAIN, NATURAL DRAINAGEWAYS, WETLAND AREAS, ON SLOPES IN EXCESS OF 25 PERCENT, OR ON UNSTABLE GROUND. Staff will attempt to preliminary identify sensitive lands areas at the pre- application conference based on available inforrnation. HOWEVER, the responsibility to precisely identify sensitive land areas, and their boundaries, is the responsibilitv of the applicant. Areas meetinQ the definitions of sensitive lands must be clearlv indicated on ptans submitted with the development apqlication. Chapter 18.775 also provides regulations for the use, protection, or modification of sensitive lands areas. RESIDENTIAL DEVELOPMENT IS PROHIBITED WITHIN FLOODPLAINS. ❑ STEEP SLOPES [R�f�r u C�d�S�cd�n 18.715.080.C1 When STEEP SLOPES exist, prior to issuance of a final order, a geotechnical report must be submitted which addresses the approval standards of the Tigard Community Development Code Section 18.775.080.C. The report shall be based upon field exploration and investigation and shall include specific recommendations for achieving the requirements of Section 18.775.080.C. �CLEANNIATER SERYICES[CWSI BUfFER STANDARDS [R�fer t�R a 0 96�4/USA R�gulatleas-Ch�pter 31 ---�b LAND DEVELOPMENT ADJACENT TO SENSITIVE AREAS shall preserve and maintain or create a vegetated corridor for a buffer wide enough to protect the water quality functioning of the sensitive area. Desi n Criteria: The EGETATED CORRIDOR WIDTH is dependent on the sensitive area. The following table identifies the required widths: TABLE 3.1 VEGETATED CORRIDOR WIDTHS SOURCE: CWS DESIGN AND CONSTRUCTION STANDARDS MANUAURESOLUTION &ORDER 96-44 SENSITIVE AREA DEFINITION SLOPE ADJACENT 4 WIDTH OF VEGETATED TO SENSITIVE AREA CORRIDOR PER SIDE • Streams with intermittent flow draining: <25% � 10 to <50 acres 15 feet � >50 to <100 acres 25 feet . Existing or created wetlands <0.5 acre 25 feet • Existing or created wetlands >0.5 acre <25% 50 feet • Rivers, streams, and springs with year-round flow • Streams with intermittent flow draining >100 acres . Natural lakes and onds • Streams with intermittent flow draining: >25% �1 10 to <50 acres 30 feet 1 >50 to <100 acres 50 feet • Existing or created wetlands >25% Variable from 50-200 feet. Measure • Rivers, streams, and springs with year-round flow in 25-foot increments from the starting • Streams with intermittent flow draining >100 acres point to the top of ravine (break in • Natural lakes and ponds <25%slope), add 35 feet past the top of ravine6 Starting point for measurement = edge of the defined channel {bankful Flow) for streams/rivers, delineated wetland boundary, delineated spring boundary, andlor average high water for lakes or ponds, whichever offers greatest resource protection. Intermittent springs, located a minimum of 15 feet within the river/stream or wetland vegetated corridor,shall not serve as a starting point for measurement. SVegetated corridor averaging or reduction is allowed only when the vegetated corridor is certified to be in a marginal or degraded condiGon. 6The vegetated corridor extends 35 feet from the top of the ravine and sets the outer boundary of the vegetated corridor. The 35 feet may be reduced to 15 feet, if a stamped geotechnical report confirms slope stability shall be maintained with the reduced setback from the top of ravine. CITY OF TIGARD Pre-Application Conference Notes Page 4 of 8 NON-Residential ApplicationlPlanning Diviswn Section � Restrictions in the VegetatE rridor: NO structures, developmer��, construction activities, gardens, lawns, application of chemicals, dumping of any materials of any kind, or other activities shall be permitted which otherwise detract from the water quality protection provided by the vegetated corridor, excepf as provided for in the CWS Design and Construction Standards. Location of Veqetated Corridor: IN ANY RESIDENTIAL DEVELOPMENT WHICH CREATES MULTIPLE PARCELS or lots intended for separate ownership, such as a subdivision, the vegetated corridor shall be contained in a separate tract, and shall not be a part of any parcel to be used for the construction of a dwelling unit. l,��WS Service Provider Letter: � PRIOR TO SUBMITTAL of any land use applications, the applicant must obtain a CWS Service Provider Letter which will outline the conditions necessary to comply with the R8�0 96-44 sensitive area req uirements. If there are no sensitive areas, CWS must still issue a letter stating a CWS Service Provider Letter is not required. SI6NS [R�f�r u C�d�Chapter 18.1801 SIGN PERMITS MUST BE OBTAINED PRIOR TO INSTALLATION OF ANY SIGN in the City of Tigard. A "Guidelines for Sign Permits" handout is available upon request. Additional sign area or height beyond Code standards may be permitted if the sign proposal is reviewed as part of a development review application. Alternatively, a Sign Code Exception application may be filed for Director's review. �TREE REMOYAL PIAN REQUIREMENTS [R�fer te Ced�S�cden 18.190.030.CJ A TREE PLAN FOR THE PLANTING, REMOVAL AND PROTECTION OF TREES prepared by a certified arborist shall be provided for any lot, parcel or combination of lots or parcels for which a development application for a subdivision, partition, site development review, planned development, or conditional use is filed. Protection is preferred over removal where possible. THE TREE PLAN SHALL INCLUDE the following: ➢ Identification of the location, size and species of all existing trees including trees designated as significant by the City; ➢ Identification of a program to save existing trees or mitigate tree removal over 12 inches in caliper. Mitigation must follow the replacement guidelines of Section 18.790.060.D according to the following standards and shall be exclusive of trees required by other development code provisions for landscaping, streets and parking lots: � Retainage of less than 25% of existing trees over 12 inches in caliper requires a mitigation program according to Section 18.150.070.D. of no net loss of trees; � Retainage of from 25 to 50% of existing trees over 12 inches in caliper requires that two- thirds of the trees to be removed be mitigated according to Section 18.790.060.D.; 1 Retainage of from 50 to 75% of existing trees over 12 inches in caliper requires that 50% of the trees to be removed be mitigated according to Section 18.790.060.D.; � Retainage of 75% or greater of existing trees over 12 inches in caliper requires no mitigation; ➢ Identification of all trees which are proposed to be removed; and ➢ A protection program defining standards and methods that will be used by the applicant to protect trees during and after construction. TREES REMOVED WITHIN THE PERIOD OF ONE (1) YEAR PRIOR TO A DEVELOPMENT APPLICATION LISTED ABOVE will be inventoried as part of the tree plan above and will be replaced according to Section 18.790.060.D. �MITI6ATION [R�fer to Code Secdon 18.790.060.E1 REPLACEMENT OF A TREE shall take place according to the following guidelines: ➢ A replacement tree shall be a substantially similar species considering site characteristics. ➢ If a replacement tree of the species of the tree removed or damaged is not reasonably available, the Director may allow replacement with a different species of equivalent natural resource value. CITY OF TIGARD Pre-Application Conference Notes Page 5 of 8 NON•Residential ApplicaOOn,Planning Divison Section ➢ If a replacement tre the size cut is not reasonably avai a on the local market or would not be viable, the Director shall require replacement with more than one tree in accordance with the following formula: � The number of replacement trees required shall be determined by dividing the estimated caliper size of the tree removed or damaged, by the caliper size of the largest reasonably available replacement trees. If this number of trees cannot be viably located on the subject property, the Director may require one (1) or more replacement trees to be planted on other property within the city, either public property or, with the consent of the owner, private property. ➢ The planting of a replacement tree shall take place in a manner reasonably calculated to allow growth to maturity. IN-LIEU OF TREE REPLACEMENT under Subsection D of this section, a party may, with the consent of the Director, elect to compensate the City for its costs in performing such tree replacement. �LEAR YISION AREA [R�fcr u Cede Chapt�r 18.7951 The Cit requires that CLEAR VISION AREAS BE MAINTAtNED BETWEEN THREE (3) AND EIGHT �8) FEET IN HEIGHT at road/driveway, road/railroad, and road/road intersections. The size of the required clear vision area depends upon the abutting street's functional classification and any existing obstructions within the clear vision area. ❑ ADDITIONAL LOT DIMEIlSI�NAL REQOIREMENTS [Refor to Cede Sectlen 18.810.8601 MINIMUM LOT FRONTAGE: 25 feet unless lot is created through the minor land partition process. Lots created as part of a partition must have a minimum of 15 feet of frontage or have a minimum 15-foot-wide access easement. The DEPTH OF ALL LOTS SHALL NOT EXCEED 2'/z TIMES THE AVERAGE WIDTH, unless the parcel is less than 1'/2 times the minimum lot size of the applicable zoning district. cooE c�s �18.330{�o�d�oona�usel 18.620(rga�d Triarx��e�n standards) �" 18.765(ottstreet Pa�cin�.oading Requirements) _ �$.�O(D�ors Interpretation) �8.630 iw�,��«,s��R��i c�,c�� 18.775�se��R��w� �H.35O(Planr�ed Devebpment) �8.�05(Access/EgresslCir�ula6on) ✓18.780�s��s� ✓18.360�srte�ebpment Review� 'I 8.�'I O(Accessory Residential Units) 18.785(remporary use Permrts) _ 1 H.37O(VarianoeslAdjustrnents) 1 H.715(Densiry Computations) �18.790(Tree Removaq _ 18.380(zonirg rv�aytext Amendments) /18.720(Desgn Compatibi�iry Standards) �8.795(v�sua�C�earance Areas) �15.385(Misce�laneous Permits) ✓ �S.7Z5(Environmental Perfomiance Standards) 1 H.7J8(Wireless Communication Facilioes) �1 1 S.3JO(Decisan Making Proceduresllmpact S�dy) 18.730(Exceptions To Devebpment Standards) �,C I$.$�O(Street&Utility Improvement Siandards) _ 18.410(�ot une Aajustments) �8.740(Histaic Overlay) _ 18.420(�and Partieons) ��42(Home Occupation PertnAS) _ 18.430 cs��a�� _,L 18.745(�andscaping&saeen�g standards) �8.510�R�,r�i z«��o�a�� 18.750(�v�anutac��redm�o�i�Home Re9u�ations) _ 1 H.52O(Commercial Zoning Districts) �18.755(Maed 5o��d waste�ecyd�ng Storage) _ 18.530(Industrial Zoning Distrids) 1 S.76O(Noncontortning Situations) CITY OF TIGARD Pre-Application Conference Notes Page 6 of 8 NON-Residential AppliCaboNPlannmg Division SeCtion ADDRIONAL CONCERNS OR COMMENT'. /"t�p•4v.,-+�X C�L.I �-CJL.i U .V1 � �• 3 � U' C�.3 � W(,[1 4CX,�d �CL1M � �i �'�S I Q/!.o �l�CG� L � �i� .�.JL+.�(6�+ ��[Y1tii R�.��w c.c.�'te.G,'•� 1�'. 3 (�[� , S u � Lf't ' �n�l r'4ct1'►'v�� n��u1,'�c � ,�K�(�d�� 1��.r s�d� d r�.,.�.,,.�.0 � ,(_�:.d.o c vr`(,r/�'� s��t�. A 1�. < ��;��•� �(a..1 �('�� a r�_ _ P A(G�r.� ��c t��c11 e�.v�.-t►�..,�� s fYU c.t►c /�� C�n �-, o� ai �� e�1c�'rh'�� v !� (:.PGlP � �P�d'r.'� F, `�.�. , �C ouP�tl -�— �— tMG�, (f e s u �;e�c# --F� Se,u�e��.0 C.��v...cl,t.#i��+1 �t u�n-�c��`� ��..� a,e I I I /1 �.tt,2e�� PROCE00RE Administrative Staff Review. � Public hearing before the Land Use Hearings Officer. Public hearing before the Planning Commission. Public hearing before the Planning Commission with the Commission making a recommendation on the proposal to the City Council. An additional public hearing shall be held by the City Council. APPLICATION SUBMITTILL PROCESS All APPLICATIONS MUST BE ACCEPTED BY A PLANNING DIVISION STAFF MEMBER of the Commurnty Development Department at Tigard City Hall offices. PLEASE NOTE: A lications submitted b mail or dro ed off at the counter without Plannin ivision acce tance ma e returned. he Planninq counter closes at 5:00 PM. Ma s submitted with an a lication shall be folded IN ADVANCE to 8'/z" x 11". One 8'/z" x 11" ma o a ro ose ro'ect s a e su mitte or attac ment to t e sta re ort or administrative decision. Applications with un olde maps shall not be accepted. The Planning Division and Engineering Department will perform a preliminary review of the application and will determine whether an application is complete within 30 days of the counter submittal. Staff will notify the applicant if additional information or additional copies of the submitted matenals are required. CITY OF TIGARD Pre-Applica6on Conference Notes Page 7 of S NON-Residen6al Application/Planning Division Section The administrative decision ,�ublic hearing will typically occur a�,, �cimately 45 to 60 days after an application is accepted as be�ng complete by the Planning Division. Applications involving difficult or protracted issues or requiring review by other jurisdictions may take additional time to review. Written recommendations from the Planning staff are issued seven (7) days prior to the public hearing A 10-day public appeal period follows all land use, ecisions. An appeal on this matter would be heard by the Tigard . A basic flow chart which illustrates the review process is avai ab rom the Planning Division upon request. Land use applications requiring a public hearing must have notice posted on-site by the applicant no less than 10 days prior to the public hearing. This PRE-APPLICATION CONFERENCE AND THE NOTES OF THE CONFERENCE ARE INTENDED TO INFORM the prospective applicant of the primary Community Development Code requirements applicable to the potential development of a particular site and to allow the City staff and prospective applicant to discuss the opportunities and constraints affecting development of the site. BUILDIN6 PERMITS PLANS FOR BUILDING AND OTHER RELATED PERMITS WILL NOT BE ACCEPTED FOR REVIEW UNTIL A LAND USE APPROVAL HAS BEEN ISSUED. Final inspection approvals by the Building Division will not be granted until there is compliance with all conditions of development approval. These pre-application notes do not include comments from the Building Division. For proposed buildings or modifications to existing buildings, it is recommended to contact a Building Division Plans Examiner to determine if there are building code issues that would prevent the structure from being constructed, as proposed. Additionally, with regard to Subdivisions and Minor Land Partitions where any structure to be demolished has system development charge (SDC) credits and the underlying parcel for that structure will be eliminated when the new plat is recorded, the City's policy is to applv those system develo ment credits to the first buildin ermit issued in the develo ment (UNLESS OTHERWISE DIRECTED BY THE DEVELOPER AT THE TIME IN WHICH T E DEMOLITION PERMIT IS OBTAINED). e con erence an notes cannot cover a o e requirements an aspects re ate to site planning that should ap pl to the develo p,ment of your site plan., Failure of the staff to provide information required by the C�e shall not constitute a waiver of the applicable standards or requirements. It is recommended that a prospectiye applicant either obtain and read the Community Development Code or ask an questions of Cit staff relative to Code requirements prior to submittin an application. AN ADDITIONAL PRE-APPLICATION FEE AND CONFERENCE WILL BE REQUIRED IF AN APPLICATION PERTAINING TO THIS PRE-APPLICATION CONFERENCE IS SUBMITTED AFTER A PERIOD OF MORE THAN SIX (6) MONTHS FOLLOWING THIS CONFERENCE (unless deemed as unnecessary by the Planning Division). PREPARED BY: ��l. CITY Of TI D PLAN DIYISION - STAFF PERSON HOlDIN6 PRE-APP. MEETING PHONE: 3-63�-4111 FAX: 503-684-1�91 f 5�� 1 �� '� �� 1 EMAIL• sn s�rsc me q�ci.tigard.or.us TITLE 18(CITI' OF TIGARD'S COMMUNITY DEYELOPMENT CODE)INTERMETADDRESS: WWW.CI.ily81'd.O�.fIS H:lpattylmasterslPre-App Notes Commercial.doc Updated: 15-Dec-04 (Engineering section:preapp.eng) CITY OF TIGARD Pre-Application Conference Notes Page 8 of 8 NON-Resideneal ApplicationlPlanning D�vlswn SecUon �x � � �� l� MINUTES MITCH Charter School Major Modi�cation to a Conditional Use Permit Neighborhood Meeting July 27, 2006 The meeting started at 7:00 P.M. at the Calvin Presbyterian Church. The meeting was cnlled to order by Lee Weislogel, chuirman of the MITCH Charter School Board of Directors. Mr. Lee welcomed everyone and explained the purpose of the meeting. He then introduced Debi Lorence, principal for MITCH Charter School, and Ed Murphy, a (and use planning consultant with LDC Design Group. Ms. Lorence presented a summnry of the proposed school, including the relationship between the charter school and the Tigard- Tualatin School District (TTSD). She said there would be nbout 20 students per room, that they have eight classrooms. Mr. Murphy presented a summary of the applicution review process. Approximately 10 people attended, including neighbors and church members. A sign-in sheet is ctttnched. Summnry of issues discussed: ■ Number of students, tenchers nnd staff. Debi snid they expected about 160 students, plus 8 teachers and 3 support staff. • Where the students come from. Debi explQined there are no restrictions on where the students are from, and that about 40% of the students ctre from outside the TTSD boundaries. ■ Traffic impacts. Debi explained that most children arrive at 7:45 AM nnd leave at 3:30 PM, Monday through Thursday, and that many of the children arrive in car-pools. Ed Murphy said he would check into estnblishing school speed zones. • Curriculum. Debi explained the school's emphasis on agriculture, arts, music and PE. Discussion of how the curriculum might be different from a regular public school or a privnte school. ■ Recess. There was some discussion about use of the gymnasium nnd the smnll outdoor playground. • Special needs children. Debi expinined how TTSD provides nssistance with special needs students. • Use of the interior space. There was some discussion obout storage and shared use of the facilities between MITCH and Church Sunday School. • Liability. Debi assured attendees that MITCH carries linbility insurance. No one brought up any issues related to site improvements, or mentioned any off-site impncts. The meeting was ad journed nt approximntely 8:15 P.M. ### SIGN-IN SH�ET ' iVII�CH Charter School Collditia��l Use Permit Nei�hborhaod Meetin� �� lulv 27, 2006 ��.�'!1E .�I)�3R�:SS PI�ON� _ _ --___...__._..�.—_------ __...Y._._______--.----------- � ( Z74�o 5� ( !I � TI C . .__.__ _ ,4 r-J �� ---�� 77�,�,2� `�' 7 ZZ3------------ ��`�-� 7 7/ � z, -t�s �5w� e t�c.K fw� �. • - - -- ------ —l_s�.v,rdl----�------- ---� C�--`�_?1�?- _------------- C�1�-��— � ��:�r' � Fo�J /y'74�?�i��o.�ti _27��-------_ l0 39-0��-� N -- _ _ ___------ - � �1�'�—` ��Z---------�`��J -��—jJ-__.–��-�_----._-____..—��_✓��-�� _ (cl_./UlU r�[,�� --��'75 Sc� (��u,��Uc�. S�'_.___y7zZy--_ ---------Co_.��_�'��° � � ^ �i^t ��e-��K ti_-- lD��S'�� ez — ��------- � � S ��'/ �J�,c� �� - � — ----__----f S3�_� sw �� r'` I� zLr ��--� � � ��—_�C�–�^ t� ---��j�; �,,.�--�Z�c,c� .�.;`� _��c�___��.�5"75� _ � \' __�� _------_!�L� s� 9��- ��9_?z z-� ----- —\ � � I C� T �/ U — a��.V u�`f_!._�!�.l L r _�D 3�D _ S� �(.v�_�.�[/)�E,I^ Ip U r� �Gt:✓I e. / l �2 ! - /CP� � -�-- - -- -- / ��4-�,�� ('� i —`�.� C�"?J ---��--.�')--i ( °.�^-'"'�-�t _�` �_�-�% ^~� ' `� / � �i4 no�' reC�e�e� �� r�af�<e •T• . ,, i � � July 12, 2006 y o 0 �RTER �SG� Muhi-sensory lnstruction �� M.I.T.C.H. Charter School Teaching Children Hands-on Dear Interested Party, The mission o f M.I.T.C.N. rs to use commonly shored M.I.T.C.H. Charter School is applying to locate at the Calvin Presbyterian knowledge to build the Church located at 10445 S.W. Canterbury and 103rd,Tigard Oregon. We foundation for educotion where are proposing a Kindergarten through eighth grade, one class per grade, all swdents leam the school at this location. M.I.T.C.H. Charter School would not be making critical elements of reading, any interior or exterior changes to the building or site. wrrting and thinking skills. These educationol concepts Prior to applying to the City of Tigard for the necessary land use ore bosed upon ihe approvals,M:I.T.C.H. Charter School officials will be available to discuss Core Knowledge Sequence the proposal in more detail with the surrounding property owners and curriculum obtained from residents. �You are invited to attend a meeting on: grade-by-grnde sequence o f speci f c content in all 7i11y 27,2006 core academics— -- - 7:�Op.]ri. _ _ _...- - �coming builds upon leoming. Calvin Presbyterian Church 10445 S.W. Canterbury Teaching to the Tlg3td, OR 97223 , whole child; �;s�r,g tne b�r ot Please notice this will be an informational meeting on preliminary plans. educational expectations. '1'hese plans maybe 3ltered prior t0 the Submittal Of the appliCation t0 the , city. � Grades K-8 M.I.T.C.H. Cha.rter school representatives look forward to addressing:your Core Knowledge School questions on the 27�, or you may call the schoo1503-639-5757 at any time. Riggs Language Arts . Sincerely, Saxon Math G�-�L�� a�� L Debi Lorence � 503-639-5757 Founder/Pri.ncipal M.I.T.C.H. Charter School � Attachment enclosed PO Box 230575 : Tigard,OR 9728 I-0575 - www.mitchcharterschool.org mitch@mitchcharterschool.org • � � OE�OR�iMICINiORM��IOM BY6TEM AREA N�TIFIED " �„ m"'"n" (500') „� � �� - ,�. ,� n„n..�m mm�mn mmmm mmnm� � naw� e m�nane mmmm mmenm etmemn � � ——————————— � FOR: D ebi Lorence TE ' "'" ""'�' m'��'�' RE: 2S 111 BC, 2800 e u.n,.� n�„„, n. ,.n......mu.m�.. n„�wrcM G =__________ �� mn T Property owner fnformation � mMn„„ is vali�for 3 mon�hs frorii m� the date prfnled on�hla map. J� mmm�� mn�e.nn CANTERBUR °"'""" �,.p„� m,.�« �� m,.�� m�mn� miwewn �� n � � � �� mmeum �n�� mmnnn nnwnm � � i imnpm� u e � � m mnnm� �nn mmenm . m � MURDOCK ST " ♦ N � � 8� 0 100 200 300 4D0 Feel B1"=307 feat �8 ' " "�1U = � m DELMONTE DR � �� mm . � � InWrtnatian on lhls map is for generel locatlon only end should be verified wilh Ihe Developmerrt Servies�Dlvisfon. 13125 5W NeM Blvd Tlp�rd,DR 97223 (503)639-4171 � - � hllp:fMv+w.cl.11pard.or.ua C�mmunitv hwvPlnnmant PIOt date:JUI 12.2006:C:\maoicUNA(+IC03 APR �° �FFtDAVIT OF M, .iNG1POSTiNC NElGHBOf )OD MEETING NOTICE •IMPORTANT'NOTICE '=THE APPLICANT lS REQUlRED T� MAIL THE C1TY:Of TIGARD A COPY: OF THE �_ NEIGH80RHOOD MEETfNG NOTICE TNAT PERTAINS TO THIS AFf(DAVIT AT TNE SAME T{ME PROPERTY; ,: ; OWNERS ARE MAILED:NOTiCE, TQ THE ADDRESS BELOW ` ; , - tity of:�Tigard Plann�ng Division�� ; '�-'� ' - " t 3725 SV+1,Hall BouTevard - = Tigard, OR 972�3 8:1:$4 _ - aN'=ADDITiON, TNE APP,LICANT, SHALL SUBMIT THJS AFFIDAYIT &-,COPlES aF ALL NOTICES AT,TNE�7tME 0F APPl�ICATION: MAILING: � �� ,_ ^ ` ,; . .�_�,��..: _ �, ;��,� � v^�-..�C- �.�- , being duly sworn,depose and say that on the � �d" day of �- '� , 20�:-(�-., f caused to have mailed to each of the,persons on the attached list,a notice of a meeting to discuss a proposed development at(or near) ��`��t `� ��,,; � �.,..�-;� � l;L��, ✓?i� , ��`!��C`._�k' ��'_---- �a coPY of which notice so mailed is attached hereto and made a pa of hereof. -- . 1 furfher state that said notices were e�closed in envelopes plainly addressed to said persons and were deposited on the date indicated above in the United States Post Office located at ` := i4�� %��' c�`"� -' , with postage prepaid thereon. � � '- .. . � � �`l':-1 '"�,,,-- �}� '�t��_�-:ti:_.� i. .�J ' � � Signature (In the p�esence of a Notary Public) �POSTING: -, �, ��'�`�' �- ��j'"�''_'�-`"'- . do a�rm that I am (represent) the party initiating interesf in-.a proposed q ;ti�e--�i"� �; �, �.�=�-�� !-�-Y�� affecting the land located at,(state the approximate location(s) IF no address(s)andlor tax lot(s) curce�t�y registered) t �`1�� , �-�'�= ` � �l� Y`� , and did on the l � day of Y�.Y� �0 ,��= personally post notice indicating that the site may be proposed for a ��:-i;�-+�� - '�-..=�� application, and the time, date and place of a neighbort►ood meeting to discuss the proposal. The sign was posted at �i�r�� =0__ �-�.w ��,-.._�� 'A .��c=�.,.:. '�-z �'�.��`�..-- �•,'!'- �` -. �� r�A,�_�-� r . (state location you posted notice ort property) � . � � � r _ � ,��o�.` . i�"�'/L�, J"l��-� �-�=•�.r_.. , Sig�ature (In the presence of a Notary Public) (THtS SECTION FOR A STATE OF OREGON, NOTARY PUBLIC TO COMPLETEINOTARIZE) STATE OF d��-��:�-, ) County of lrJc,,�h,..,s�n ) ss. � -� . Subscribed and swornlaffirmed before me on the � � day of J� �� , 20 ��. _�j�Tf, ��`��-- OFFICiAL SEAI � ,,�-`"� �il�TiE J PEERMAN '�±`✓y�� NpTARY PUBLIC-OREGON ��---"' C�ftiiMISSION N0.370962 - MY CG'��Pvl!^SIC1N EX�IRES�UIY 28,2007 u, . _f�.ft.�L.�.,� �� - � -�`° � NOTARY PUBLIC F OREGON My Commission Expires:�-=�� Y, �-il� � Applicant,please complete�the in#ormation below: NAME OF PROJECT OR PROPOSED DEVELOPMENT; ��'�rC� l�- �--L�c �~��-t >. l��,�-:ti d�=��` TYPE OF PROPOSED DEVEtOPMENT`. ->=-�L=�%Z Address o�General Location of Subject Property: �' i'` t � �.. ' • +-n°: .;. �- � �" ,.� Subject Property Tax Map(s)and Lot#(s)'. A` s 1 ` f C�--..Z�«'r') � �—� h:Voginlpattylmastars�affidavit af mailing-posting neighborhood meeting.doc . , = �, � ��-�- �l / r� � o°� 25110AD-00510 . 2S111BC-00200 BACKHAUS BRENDA BOGERT MARK H AND 10627 Sb'J CANTERBURY LN MARY E TIGARD,OR 97224 14445 SW 100TH TIGARD,OR 97223 2 tOAD-00500 2S110AD-01800 BAC U ENDA BROWN SCOTT C 106 NTERBURY LN 14630 SW 106TH AVE ARD,OR 24 TIGARD,OR 97224 2S1116C-03600 2S1116C-01400 BATES STEPHEN CHRISTOPHER AND BUEHLER GREGORY J 8�SARA L JODETTE SUGDEN 10145 SW VIEW TER 10430 SW VIEW TERRACE TIGARD,OR 97224 TIGARD,OR 97224 2S111BC-01000 2S11DAD-04240 BAUMAN C WAYNE&MARY BUKRES MIWAKO 10270 SW VIEW TER 14615 SW 106TH AVE TIGARD,OR 97224 TIGARD,OR 97224 25110AD-04204 2 10AD-04203 BEHRENDT ROBERT F AND SHARON A BU S AKO 1450 S KIHEI RD C205 146 106TH AVE KIHEI,HI 96753 �GARD,O 97224 110AD-04250 2S110A�-02810 B EN OBERT F AND SHARON A CAGLE THOMAS E 145 EI RD C205 PO BOX 2fi EI, HI 9 53 TUALATIN,OR 97062 2S110AD-02300 2S110AD-02800 BENZ FRED S C TH AS E PO BOX 230029 PO B TIGARD,OR 97281 ALATIN,0 97062 110AD-02310 2S110AD-09400 BE CALWAY HILL HOMEOWNERS ASSOC PO 2 9 BY STAN ADKINS BUILDER INC ARD,OR 97281 8459 SW BARBUR BLVD PORTLAND,OR 97223 2S111BC-0380a 2 OAD-09600 BERTULEIT MIRIAM R/DANIEL TRS CALW ILL HO WNERS ASSOC 10390 SW VIEW TERRACE ST BY STAN A BUILDER INC TIGARD,OR 97224 8459 ARB BLVD P TLAND,OR 97 23 2S111BC-02900 2 110AD-�9500 BOEHR IRWIN I AND PATRICIA L CAL Y HILL H EOWNERS ASSOC TRUSTEES BY STA S BUILDER INC 10470 SW VIEW TERRACE 8459 BA UR BLVD TIGARD,OR 97224 RTLAND,OR 97223 2 110AD-01200 , 2S110AD-00300 CA AY HILL HO EOWNERS ASSOC DIXON CANDICE M BY ST 'A S BUILDER INC 10631 5W CANTERBURY LN 8459 BUR BLVD TIGARD,OR 97224 TLAND,O 97223 2S110AA-01500 2 10AD-00310 CANTERBURY PLACE LLC DIX C CE M 109 E 13TH ST 1063 ANTERBURY LN VANCOUVER,WA 98660 ARD,OR 7224 2S 111 BC-04800 2S17 OAD-02100 COOPER THEODORE P& DREYER JOAN C SHELLEY R 14678 SW 106TH AVE 10198 SW INEZ ST TIGARD,OR 97224 TIGARD,OR 97224 25111 BC-02503 2 10A0.02110 CORLISS JAMES UCORA K DRE J C 9750 SW INEZ 1467 6TH AVE TIGARD,OR 97224 ARD,OR 7224 2S110AD-02000 2S7776C-03001 CRIST DAVID L&BARBARA A DUNKLEE JOHN 8 MARGARET 14672 SW 106TH AVE 10440 SW VIEW TERR TIGARD,OR 97223 TIGARD,OR 97224 2 110AD-02010 2S111 BB-02400 CR DAVID 8 BARBARA A DURFEE DAVID A&SHIRLY M 14672 6TH AVE 10460 SW AMANDA CT RD,OR 7223 TIGARD,OR 97224 2S177BC-02401 2S111BB-01200 CROSS ROGER K III 8 CLARE E FABER ROBERT C&MARGARET A 10155 SW MURDOCK ST 14230 SW 103RD TIGARD,OR 97224 TIGARD,OR 97224 2S110AD-00200 2S1116C-03700 DANCESCU CHRISTIAN FAIRLEY RONALD S 8 KAREN S 10633 SW CANTERBURY LN 10420 SW VIEW TERRACE TIGARD,OR 97224 TIGARD,OR 97224 2 110AD-00210 2S1116C-02300 DA SCU RISTIAN FANTZ GARY E AND GAY 1D63 ANTERBURY LN 14530 SW 103RD AVE T RD, OR 24 TIGARD,OR 97223 2S711BC-03500 2S110AD-08600 DAVIS EDWARD 8 SUSAN LYNN FISHER ELEANOR 10445 SW VIEW TER 10505 SW CANTERBURY LN TIGARD,OR 97224 TIGARD,OR 97224 25111BC-04500 , 2S1118C-04700 FRISWOLD JAMES E&DIANA J HEYWORTH SEAN A&MEGAN E 14700 SW 103RD AVE 6333 SW GARDEN HOME RD TIGARD,OR 97224 PORTLAND,OR 97219 2S111 BC-02500 2S110AD-00910 GALICH PATRICIA& HOYT JOYCE MITCHELL MICHAEL W 10619 SW CANTERBURY LN 10205 SW MURDOCK ST TIGARD,OR 97224 TIGARD,OR 97224 2S1116C-02504 2S11�AD-00900 GA H PATRIC & YT JOY MITCH HAEL W 106 CANTERBURY LN 10205 DOCK ST AR , R 97224 TI RD,OR 9 24 2S110AD-04100 2S170AD-04000 GALYEN SUSAN E HRICSINA-DOWNEY KATHERINE A 14641 SW 106TH AVE 14647 SW 106TH AVE TIGARD,OR 97224 TIGARD,OR 97224 2S111BC-03400 2S110AD-00810 GOSSELIN WILLIAM C AND JJ RENTALS LLC BETTY JEAN 14803 SW 106TH AVE 10405 SW VIEW TERR. TIGARD,OR 97224 TIGARD,OR 97223 2S111BC-04600 110AD-00800 GOTTER SAMUEL A&VICTORIA L JJ NTA LC 10125 SW MURDOCK ST 1480 106TH AVE TIGARD,OR 97224 ARD,O 7224 2S110AD-01900 2S1116C-03300 HAASE JOHN G JOHNSON DOUGLAS EDWARD AND 14666 SW 106TH AVE SUE ANN TIGARD,OR 97224 10375 SW VIEW TERRACE TIGARD,OR 97223 2S110AD-01910 2S111BB-D0900 H E J G KASTEL CHARLES G&MARY J TRS 146 106TH AVE 14259 SW 100TH T ARD,O 7224 TIGARD,OR 97224 2S110AD-01500 2 1786-01700 HADLEY MICHAEL F KA L C LES G 8�MARY J TRS 10540 SW CANTERBURY LN 1425 OOTH TIGARD,OR 97224 ARD,O 7224 2S111 BB-01800 2S110AD-01700 HEISE MONICA JO-ANN KLABO LISA M 10390 SW AMANDA CT 14620 SW 106TH AVE TIGARD,OR 97224 TIGARD,OR 97224 2S777BB-02200 , 2S110AD-01600 KLETZEL E SCOT&KRISTI S MCGUIRE STEPHEN 10479 SW AMANDA CT 10550 SW CANTERBURY LN TIGARD,OR 97224 TIGARD,OR 97224 2S171 BC-00800 2S110AD-03200 KNIGHT W A MCNALLY BELINDA C 10175 SW INEZ ST 10627 5W MURDOCK ST TIGARD,OR 97224 TIGARD,OR 97224 2S111BC-02100 2S111BC-04000 LITTLETON DAVID A AND WANDA J MILLER JUDITH A 8 PAUL E TRS 10090 SW INEZ 10330 SW VIEW TER TIGARD,OR 97224 TIGARD,OR 97224 2S111 BC-03200 2S111 BC-02700 LUKE-DORF INC MILLER PAUL E&JUDITH A 10313 SW 69TH AVE 10380 SW CANTERBURY TIGARO,OR 97223 TIGARD,OR 97224 2S110AD-02710 2S111B6-02500 LYNCH DORIS M MONTES GLORIA I&CARLOS A 10579 SW MURDOCK ST 10440 SW AMANDA CT TIGARD,OR 97224 TIGARD,OR 97223 2S 10AD-02700 2S111BC-01500 LY DO M MUDROW MICHAEL T&DIANE C 10579 MURDOCK ST 10185 SW VIEW TERR T RD, O 97224 TIGARD,OR 97224 2S110AD-03100 2S110AD-02410 MARSH BONNIE S NEVAN NICOL 10621 5W MURDOCK ST 10561 SW MURDOCK ST TIGARD,OR 97224 TIGARD,OR 97224 2S 111 BC-00700 2 10AD-02400 MCBRIDE GLEN W 8 NE NI L JANET HALL 1056 URDOCK ST 10135 SW INEZ T ARD,0 97224 TIGARD,OR 97224 2S110AD-00700 2S111BC-02302 MCELHANEY JONATHAN D NOKES DESTON S 10623 SW CANTERBURY LN 15532 SW PACIFIC HWY TIGARD,OR 97224 STE C-18#22 TIGARD,OR 97224 110AD-00710 2S111BC-02303 M HAN ONATHAN D NOKES KATHY EVELYN 10623 CANTERBURY LN PO BOX 230231 RD, 97224 TIGARD,OR 97281 2S110AD-04230 . 2S110AD-02510 O'HAGAN JEANNINE REDELL JULIE L 14625 SW 106TH AVE 10567 SW MURDOCK ST TIGARD,OR 97224 TIGARD,OR 97224 110AD-0420 2 10AD-02500 O' A ANNINE RE J L 1462 106TH AVE 10567 URDOCK ST T ARD,O 97224 T RD,OR 7224 2S110AD-03300 2S111B6-01000 OTTERSON JACK W 8 ESTHER M REEDER MARY R 38177 S DESERT STAR DR 14300 SW 103RD AVE TUCSON,AZ 85739 TIGARD,OR 97223 2S1t16C-o06o0 2S111B6-o2600 PARTINGTON BRIGITTE ROCHE RICHARD L 8 KELLY J LIVING TRUST 10420 SW AMANDA CT BY B PARTINGTON TRUSTEE TIGARD,OR 97224 10085 SW INEZ ST TIGARD,OR 97224 2S1116C-01100 2S111BC-01200 PHILLIPS LOIS JEAN SEARS ALLEN C 20290 SW COMANCHE TER Go WILLIAMS GRANT&LANA TUALATIN,OR 97062 10190 SW VIEW TER TIGARD,OR 97224 2S110AD-01000 2S110AD-01100 POWELL JACQUELINE S SHIBLEY KENT D 8 RUTH K P 0 BOX 23322 10615 SW CANTERBURY LN TIGARD,OR 97281 TIGARD,OR 97224 110AD-01D1 2 tOAD-01110 PO LL CQUEI.INE S SHI Y T D 8 RUTH K P 0 3322 1061 ANTERBURY LN T ARD,0 97281 ARD,OR 7224 2S111BC-02800 2S111BB-02300 PRESBYTERY OF PORTLAND THE SPRAGUE DEREK G&KORINDA E CALVIN PRESBYTERIAN CHURCH 10480 SW AMANDA CT 10445 5W CANTERBURY LN TIGARD,OR 97224 TIGARD,OR 97224 2S1118C-00900 251116C-01700 PRESBYTERY OF THE CASCADES STACK RICHARD W JUDITH C BY CALVIN PRESBYTERIAN CHURCH 10265 SW VIEW TERR 10445 SW CANTERBURY LN TIGARD,OR 97224 TIGARD,OR 97224 2S111BC-03900 2S110AD-02600 RAUDY BEVERLY STANLEY CHERIE 10360 SW VIEW TERRACE 10573 SW MURDOCK TIGARD,OR 97224 TIGARD,OR 97224 110AD-02610 � 2S110AD-04220 STA E HERIE TUCKER NOEL EDWARD 1057 MURDOCK 14635 SW 106TH AVE T ARD,OR 97224 TIGARD,OR 97224 2S110AD-00110 110AD-0420 STRATTON CHARLA MARIE T E EL EDWARD 10635 5W CANTERBURY LN 146 106TH AVE TIGARD,OR 97224 ARD, 97224 2S110AD-00100 2S110AD-02210 ST O ARLA MARIE UHLER ANN S 8 1063 ANTERBURY LN COATES LAURA C ARD,OR 7224 14684 SW 106TH AVE TIGARD,OR 97224 2S110AD-037D0 110AD-02200 STRICKLER JAMES P 8 U ANN TINA R COATE RA C 14677 SW 106TH AVE 146 W TH AVE TIGARD,OR 97223 ARD,OR 97224 2S110AD-03600 2S1178C-01300 TAYLOR CHARLES C II 8 AVA C UM EUNKYU C&KWANG Y 14685 SW 106TH AVE 10150 SW VIEW TER TIGARD,OR 97224 TIGARD,OR 97224 2S110AD-08801 OAD-08690 TIGARD COLONY LIMITED PARTNERSHI UNK WNER 380 UNION ST STE 300 WEST SPRINGFIELD, MA 1089 2 11 OAD-08700 2S110AD-03900 TI D C Y LIMITED PARTNERSHI WEBBER MICHAEL D 380 U ST STE 300 9612 171ST AVE SE T SPRI IELD, MA 1089 SNOHOMISH,WA 98290 2S110AD-08701 2S110AD-03800 TI D CO Y LIMITED PARTNER5H1 WENSTRAND ROBERT G 380 U ST STE 300 14661 SW 106TH AVE T SPRI IELD,MA 1089 TIGARD,OR 97224 2S1118C-02600 2S1116C-04400 TIGARD WATER DISTRICT WILDER RANDY A&JANETTE L 8777 SW BURNHAM ST COCHRAN BOYD C&WANDA J PO BOX 23000 WESTENHAVER DANA L&MARY LYN T TIGARD,OR 97223 14563 SW 100TH AVE TIGARD,OR 97224 251118C-03100 2S7118C-04300 TIMMINS KELLY A 8 KATHLEEN M WILDER RANDY A/JANETTE L 14335 SW 103RD AVE 14541 SW 100TH AVE TIGARD,OR 97224 TIGARD,OR 97224 i 2S110AD-00400 WILLEMS ATHENA 10629 SW CENTERBURY LN TIGARD,OR 97224 2S1 AD-00410 WILLE AT A 10629 TERBURY LN T RD,OR 97 4 2S11DAD-00610 WILLIAMS TERRY T 10625 SW CANTERBURY LN TIGARD,OR 97224 2 10AD-00600 WILL S T Y T 1062 NTERBURY LN ARD,OR 9 24 2S111BC-o16o0 YOUR ESTATE PO BOX 738 VANCOUVER,WA 98666 Josh Tho�nas Gretchen Buehner 10395 SW Bonanza 13249 SW 136th Place ��igard, OR 97224 Tigard, OR 97224 Kristen Miller 8940 SW Edgewood Street Tigard, OR 97223 Paul Owen 10335 SW Highland Drive Tigard, OR 97224 Tim Esau PO Box 230695 Tigard, OR 97281 CPO 4B 16200 SW Pacific Highway, Suite H242 Tigard, OR 97224 Ross Sundberg 16382 SW 104th Avenue Tigard, OR 97224 Brian Wegener 9830 SW Kimberly Drive Tigard, OR 97224 Joseph Dyar 10285 SW Highland Dnve Tigard, OR 97224-4668 Rex Caffall 13205 SW Village Glenn Tigard, OR 97223 John Frewing 7110 SW Lola Lane Tigard, OR 97223 CITY OF TIGARD - SOUTH INTEREiTED PARTIES (oa. I o( I1 li:lcurolnlsetu�\IabeIslCIT South.docl UPDATED: 12-Mav-05 � • • , CITI( 0� TI GARD � COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT ,� PLANNING DIVISION : 13125 SW HALL BOULEYARD TIGARD, OREGON 97223 . . , � PHONE: 503-639-4171 FAX: 563-624-3681 (Attn: Patty/Planning) O � �U O U � U O � � 0 0 0 O p Mnn� l�A�ir YJ � � Property owner information is valid for 3 months from the date of your request INDICATE ALL PROJECT MAP & TAX LOT NUMBERS (i.e. 1 S134AB, Tax Lot 00100) OR THE ADDRESSES FOR ALL PROJECT PARCELS BELOW: �,�'//�B� �� 0 S � � � PLEASE BE AWARE THAT ONLY 1 SET OF LABELS INILL BE PROVIDED AT THIS TIME FOR HOLDING YOUR NEIGHBORHOOD MEETING. After submitting your land use application to the City, and the pro ect planner has reviewed your application for completeness, you will be notified by means of an incomp�eteness letter to obtain your 2 final sets o� labels. . The 2 final sets of labels need to be placed on envelopes (no self-adhesive envelopes please) with first class letter-rate ostage on the envelopes in the form of posta e stamps (no metered envelopes and no return address�and resubmitted to the City for the purp ose o� provitling notice to property owners of the proposed land use ap lication and the decision. The 1 sets ot envelopes must be kept separate. The person I�sted below wilPbe called to pick up and pay for the labels when they are ready. .� LQ�" NAME OF CONTACT PERSON: �-�� --►-1 c� PHONE: �D3 '�f�� aI �'/(a FAX: EMAIL:�;�Cti �, �•��-�l.cti��1-��,1• This request may be mailed, faxed or hand delivered to the City of Tigard. Please allow a 2-day minimum for processing reques�s. Upon completion of your request the contact person will be calletl to pick up their request that will be placed in "Will CaIP' by their last name, at the Community Development Reception Desk. The cost of processing your request must be paid at the time of pick up, as exact cost can not be pre-determined. PLEASE N4TE: FOR REASONS OF ACCURACY, ONLY ORIGINAL MAILING LABELS PROVIDED BY THE CITY VS. RE-TYPED MAILING LABELS WILL BE ACCEPTED. Cost Description: $11 to generate the mailing list, plus$2 per sheet for printing the list onto labels(20 addresses per sheet). • Then, multi I the cost to print one set of labels b the number of sets re uested. EXAMPLE COST FOR THIS REQUEST 4 sheets of labels x$2/sheet= 8.00 x 2 sets= $16.00 � sheet(s)of labels x$2lsheet= x�sets= n 1 sheets of labels x$Z/sheet for interested parties x 2 sets= $ 4.00 �sheet(s)of labels x$2lsheet for int rested parties=$ o'� x�sets= GENERATE LIST = $11.00 GENERATE LIST = $11.00- TOTAL = $31.00 � TOTAL = �� I� �`b .'+- 1 I � � � � � � � � �' � DISPOSAL COMPANY P.O. Box 820 Sherwood, OR 97140 Phone: (503) 625-6177 Fax: (503) 625-6179 July 20, 2006 LDC Design Group Attention: Ed Murphy 20085 NW Tanasbourne Dr. Hillsboro, OR 97124 Re: Calvin Presbyterian Church, 10445 SW Canterbury Ln., Tigard, OR 97224 Pride Disposal currently provides both trash and recycling commercial service at this Iocation. We have front-load trucks that empty the trash and co-mingle recycling and a residential truck that collects the glass totes for recycling. At this time we don't foresee a change in accessibility for service with the addition of the Mitch Charter School moving on-site. However, there may be a need for increased service, which can be evaluated at any time. Please let us know if you have any questions. Sincerely, , ^ %��1�� c� Linda Lopeman Pride Disposal Company (503� 625-6177 ext 133 lindal .qridedisqosat.com tyk i 2, Leder -crovvk F,-e Q__\":kec �� l� , ��, f 1�;� August 2, 2006 Projed No. OR06.062.T01 Tigard MITCH School �� ;,;' Engineers Ms Kim McMillan ` °�°'°��°^'P°^y City of Tigard 13125 SW Hall Boulevard a l�� s 4 Zli�� Tigard, OR 97223 ClTY OF T1GAF�' SUB]ECT: Tra�cAnalysis for the Proposed Tigard MITCH School[o be ,� F:,;.�;�� ;_;,jU,;;_` located on the northwest corner of SW 103'd Avenue/SW Canterbury Lane intersection in Tigard, Oregon Dear Ms McMillan: Based on your request, CTS Engineers has performed an analysis of the traffic impacts of the proposed relocation of the existing Tigard MITCH K-8 Charter School from its former location at Tigard High School to a new location within the Calvin Presbyterian Church, at the corner of SW 103rd Avenue/SW Canterbury Lane in Tigard (see Figure 1). The Comprehensive Plan designation for the Calvin Church is LOW 3.5 (Low- density residential). Religious institutions and schools are permitted in this district. The MITCH School is a K-8 charter school with classes Monday through Thursday from 8:00 AM to 3:30 PM. Other than being closed every Friday, it will operate on the same schedule as the Tigard School District, with no school during holidays or other breaks in the school year. The MITCH School has no regular weeknight or weekend activities. The MITCH School charter allows a maximum of 198 students. For the first two years, it is planned to operate without 7"' and 8"' grade classes, with a proportionate reduction in enrollment. However, to ensure a conservative analysis of potential tra�c impacts, the analysis assumes the maximum enrollment of 198 students. (For comparison, there were 170 students enrolled at the MITCH School's existing Tigard High location during the 2005-2006 school year). Based on the results of this analysis, it is concluded that the proposed Tigard MITCH School can occupy space within the Calvin Presbyterian Church without adversely affecting the traffic operational or safety charaderistics of the adjacent street system. Specific findings of this study are as follows: • Study area roadways and intersections carry relatively low traffic volumes during the peak hours of school traffic. Both intersections analyzed in detail operate at level of service A or B during these peak hours, with little delay. • Based on a telephone conversation with Calvin Presbyterian Church staff, the church has no weekday activities and limited weeknight activities, with the only regularly scheduled event held every Wednesday evening. Thus, the school and church schedules are complementary uses with peak trip generation periods that do not overlap. • The site has approximately 177 on-site parking spaces, including 29 spaces on the west side in a parking area primarily used by staff. The two parking areas are connected via an internal parking access loop. No additional parking or expansion of the existing church area is proposed. Parking lot access is provided via three existing driveways, two on SW Canterbury Lane and one on ZppgS NW Tanasbourne Drive SW 103rd Avenue. The main driveway on SW Canterbury Lane is about 180 Hiiisboro,OR 97124 feet west of SW 103rd Avenue/SW Canterbury l.ane intersedion, and the main P 503.690.8080 driveway on SW 103rd Avenue is about 285 feet north of the intersection. F 5o3.bas.593o There are no other driveways or connections between the intersection and the E hillsboro@ctsengineers.com main parking lot accesses. The existing parking area and internal www.ctsengineers.com circulation/storage will easily accommodate peak the MITCH School's peak traffic and parking demand. �rii5u��o,oR T i I la mook,oR Vancouver,WA Bellevue,wA Cceur d'Alene,iD Sacramento,CA Cl2ffTlOf1[,FL www.paraticompa ny.com Tigard MITCH Schoo! Page 2 August Z, 2006 • The majority of vehicle traffic generated by the Tigard MITCH School will be during the school's morning and mid-afternoon peak hours, when school is starting or ending. The morning peak hour coincides generally with the morning peak commute hour, and thus represents the worst-case scenario for potential traffic impacts. The afternoon peak hour would be approximately 3:d0 to 4:00 PM, which is earlier than the evening commute peak hour (the school lets out at 3:30 PM). • Analysis of future 2008 background traffic volumes that will exist regardless of the buildout of the proposed Tigard MITCH School found that the study area intersections are expected to perform similar to existing conditions. • The school is expected to generate approximately 174 vehicle trips during the AM peak hour and 129 trips during the mid-afternoon peak hour of the school. Based on the MITCH school's daily operating and event schedules, a negligible number of PM peak hour vehicle trips are expected. However, to ensure a conservative evaluation of potential impacts, a PM peak hour analysis was conducted using typical private school evening peak hour trip generation rates. The morning peak hour, when maximum school traffic coincides with commuter traffic, represents the "worst case"for the proposed school's trip generation. • Analysis of total future 2008 traffic conditions with buildout of the proposed Tigard MITCH School would slightly increase traffic along SW Canterbury Lane and SW 103rd Avenue, particularly in the morning peak hour. However, the study area intersections will continue to operate at Level of Service (LOS) B or better during weekday peak hour periods. • Based on expected arrival patterns, moderate delay could occur at the two primary site entrances during the morning and mid-afternoon peak periods due to an increased number of turns at the site access points. However, the site and its internal parking area and circulation aisles are large enough that any queuing created by student pickup/dropoff activity is expected to be accommodated entirely within the site. • No off-site improvements are necessary to accommodate traffic generated by the proposed Tigard MITCH School or mitigate its impact. However, the City should post or have the applicant post the new School Zone signs along the SW 103rd Avenue frontage. (It is not necessary along SW Canterbury Lane, which has speed humps and is posted at 25 mph.) The following sections document the study's methodology, results, and major findings. PROPOSED DEVELOPMENT Figure 1 shows the general vicinity of the site. Figure iA is an aerial photo showing the existing Calvin Presbyterian Church building that will house the MITCH Charter School. The applicant is proposing to relocate the Tigard MITCH School from its current site at Tigard High School to space within the existing church. The Comprehensive Plan designation for the Tigard MITCH School is LOW 3.5 (Low-density residential), which allows both church and school uses. The school is a charter school serving K-8 (K-5 planned initially for two years), Monday through Thursday from 8:00 AM to 3:30 PM. Its charter allows a maximum enrollment of 198 students. The main parking area with approximately 147 parking spaces is located on the east side of the building. There is a smaller 30-space lot located on the west side that is typically used by staff. Parking access is provided via an existing driveway along the west side of SW 103�d Avenue and two existing driveways along the north side of SW Canterbury Lane. STUDY AREA Analysis has been conducted of surrounding roadways and driveways in the immediate vicinity of the site. Based on scoping discussions with City staff, this tra�c analysis focuses on the three site access driveways and the adjacent intersections of SW Canterbury Lane/SW 103�d Avenue and SW Inez Street/SW 103rd Avenue. Tigard MITCH School Page 3 August 2, 2006 AREA CONDITIONS Study Area Land Uses Land uses in the immediate vicinity of the site consist of single-family homes to the north, east, and west. A municipal water facility is located south of the site on the opposite side of SW Canterbury Lane. Higher density housing is located further west toward Hwy 99W. Site Accessibility Area Roadway System Figure 2 shows the approximate location of the proposed Tigard MITCH School and the surrounding roadway network. The two roadways that provide direct access to the site are 5W 103�d Avenue and SW Canterbury Lane. Table 1 presents the characteristics of these roadways, including the functional classification proposed in the City TSP. Existing and future traffic analyses in this study were conducted assuming existing roadway characteristics. Table 1: Summary of Study Area Roadway Characteristics Road Width Posted Bike On- Street Name Class (Feet) Speed Sidewalks Lane Street (mph) Parking SW 103rd Avenue Local 38 35 Yes No Yes (north of SW Canterbury Ln.) (west side) SW Canterbury Lane Neighborhood Yes (at SW 103nd Avenue) Route 31 25 (both sides) No Yes Pedestrian and Bicycling Considerations In the immediate vicinity of the site, SW Canterbury Lane has a 6-foot sidewalk along the north side adjacent to the site, and a 5-foot sidewalk on the south side. SW 103'd Avenue has a 5-foot sidewalk adjacent to the site on the west side, and no sidewalk on the east side. The nearest bike lanes are about '/a mile west of the site on Hwy 99W and '/a mile north of the site on McDonald Street. Transit Considerations The proposed development will be a K-8 charter school (K-5 initially for two years). The MITCH school draws its student body from throughout the City. It will not provide bus transportation. Tri-Met Route 12-Barbur Blvd. and Route 95-Tigard/I-5 Express both stop at the intersection of Hwy 99W/SW Canterbury Lane, slightly more than �/a mile from the site. Route 12 is a high-frequency route with service every 15 minutes or less, every day of the year. Route 95 stops every 20-30 minutes during the morning 6:00 AM to 8:00 AM commute period (northbound only) and during the afternoon peak from 4:00 PM to 6:Q0 PM (southbound only). Both routes run between Sherwood and the Portland City center via us mall in downtown Portland, as shown below. � r ' r � . • �i�� I � L��Bl�trlci � — � �;r� � C mr Ce�titvr ='�+s � Ba,�wr�i t��,� �p►+Y � 45 - �9�'� B�rbts � � �� ``� i � v;� � � �� Tigard MITCH School Page 4 August 2, 2006 Existing Tra�c Volumes and Peak Hour Operations Tra�c Volumes A reconnaissance of the site and its viciniry was conducted. Traffic volumes within the study area were obtained from weekday peak hour traffic counts conducted at the key study area intersections in late July 2006. The afternoon peak hour count was extended from 2:00 to 6:00 PM to capture the MITCH School's afternoon peak trip generation period. Pigure 3 shows these recent counts. Traffic volumes greater than 25 were rounded upward to the nearest five vehicles. These data revealed that the morning peak hour typically occurs between 7:15 - 8:15 AM and the afternoon peak hour occurs between 4:45 - 5:45 PM. The site driveways were also counted during these periods; as shown in Figure 3 there was negligible driveway traffic. To assess the impact of the proposed Tigard MITCH School relocation, tra�c operations were analyzed during the weekday morning/evening peak hours as well as the mid-afternoon (3:00 - 4:00 PM) school peak hour. These periods represent reasonable "worst case" traffic conditions within the study area and include the periods that the proposed development would generate most of its daily traffic. Peak Hour Tra�c Operations Traffic conditions at key intersections in the study area were analyzed during the weekday AM and PM peak hours. Intersection operational analyses were conducted using the procedures for evaluating unsignalized intersections in the 2000 Highway Capacity Manual(HCM), which describes the traffic operations of an intersection in terms of its Level of Service (LOS) and volume-to-capacity (V/C) ratio. For unsignalized intersections, the intersection's LOS is stated relative to the most critical intersection approach or maneuver, typically the left turn from the minor street approach. The LOS criterion is stated as a letter grade, ranging from "A," indicating little or no delay, to "F," indicating that drivers experience long delays. The LOS worksheets for results presented in this study are attached as an Appendix to this report. Based on the City of Tigard Transportation System Plan (TSP), the City requires intersections to operate at LOS E or better, with a volume-to-capacity ratio less than 1.00. Table 2 presents LOS results for the key study area intersection based on the weekday peak hour tra�c volumes shown in Figure 3. The results indicate that all study area intersections were estimated to operate at LOS B or better during the morning and evening commute peak as well as the 3:00 - 4:00 mid-afternoon hour representing the peak hour of school activity in the afternoon. These results are consistent with our observations of traffic operations made during the peak hour counts. Table 2: 2006 Existin Weekda Levels of Service Intersection AM Peak Hour PM Peak Hour Mid-PM Peak Hour Avg Avg Avg Unsignalized Vehicle Vehicle Vehicle Delay V/C Delay V/C Delay V/C Sec Veh Ratio LOS Sec Veh Ratio LOS Sec Veh Ratio LOS Canterbury�n/103rd Ave 9 6 0.17 A 10.5 0.11 B 9.3 0.09 A Critical Leg: EB Approach Canterbury Ln/ Inez St 9 � 0.01 A 9.2 0.01 A 9.5 0.02 A Critical Leg: WB Approach Traffic Safety Crash records for the most recent five years of available data (January 2001 - December 2005) were obtained from the City and examined for existing traffic safety problems at the intersections in the vicinity of the site. Figure 4 shows a summary of these data. This research found that there were two non-injury crashes reported in the study area at the intersection of SW Canterbury Lane/SW 103rd Avenue, which equates to an average annual crash rate of about 0.38 per million entering vehicles. No crashes were reported at the intersection of SW 103�d Avenue/SW Inez Street. The number and rate of reported crashes is typical of the collision experience for similar roadways throughout Washington County. Tigard MITCN Schoo! Page 5 August Z, 2006 Intersecfion Sight Distance A preliminary assessment of intersection sight distance was conducted at the site entrances on SW Canterbury Lane and SW 103rd Avenue. Photos in the Appendix document available sight distance at these intersections, which has also been documented in a separate letter submitted to the City's Development Review Engineer. SW Canterbury Lane and SW 103�d Avenue are relatively flat and straight in all directions in the immediate vicinity of the site. Adequate sight distance (10 times the posted speed) is either available or can be provided by trimming existing landscaping, as described below. • At the western (secondary) SW Canterbury Lane driveway, sight distance was found to be 250 feet to the east. Sight distance can be increased to approximately 500 feet (to SW 103rd Avenue) by trimming one bush on the school grounds. Sight distance to the west is limited to about 190 feet by a bush at the base of a tree on the property immediately west of the church. Adequate sight distance can be provided by trimming this bush. • At the main SW Canterbury Lane entrance, sight distance to the east is clear to the end of the street at SW 103rd Avenue (also about 190 feet). Sight distance to the west is 250 feet if measured 10 feet back from the edge of pavement. (Unless noted, sight distance was measured 15 feet back from the edge of pavement, which equates to the vehicle stopping behind the sidewalk.) • At the SW 103�d Avenue driveway, sight distance to the north exceeds 360 feet. Sight distance to the south is limited to 275 feet, to the intersection with SW Canterbury Lane. However, sight distance of 350 feet can be provided by trimming the lower branches of the second and third street trees south of the driveway. Based on this information, there do not appear to be any tra�c safety concerns in the immediate vicinity of the site that the applicant needs to address, except for routine landscaping maintenance. Tigard MITCH School Page 6 August 2, 2006 TRAFFIC IMPACT ANALYSIS The impact of traffic generated by the expansion of the Tigard MITCH School site on the surrounding street system during the critical weekday peak hours was analyzed as follows: • Based on anticipated K-8 operations at the new location of the Tigard MITCH School by 2008, existing traffic volumes were adjusted to reflect estimated 2008 background tra�c conditions. No other approved developments were identified, but a background growth factor was applied to existing traffic volumes in order to ensure a conservative analysis. • Weekday peak hour vehicle trips to and from the Tigard MITCH School site were estimated for the weekday morning and evening commute periods, and the mid-af�ernoon school peak. • Existing tra�c volumes on the roadways surrounding the site and the site's proximity to major roadways were evaluated to estimate the trip distribution patterns in the study area for vehicle trips generated by the site. • Estimated site-generated traffic volumes for the AM and PM Weekday peak hours were assigned to the roadway network and added to the estimated 2008 background traffic volumes to represent future traffic conditions with full build-out of the site. • Future Levels of Service (LOS) at key study area intersection were examined for 2008 conditions, assuming maximum enrollment. Future 2008 Background Traffic Volumes To assess the likely future traffic conditions regardless of the proposed development, increases in traffic due to general growth and other proposed developments in the vicinity of the site were estimated. Based on the City's adopted TSP, which projects an average annual increase of 2.0 percent per year in citywide vehicle trips, a slightly more conservative background growth rate of 2.5 percent per year was applied. No other proposed developments in the immediate vicinity were identified. Thus, to calculate the future background 2008 peak hour tra�c volumes, existing volumes in Figure 3 were increased by 5 percent (2 years x 2.5% per year = 4%) to account for other increases in traffic due to sources outside the study area during the next two years. The resulting future background peak hour traffic volumes are shown in Figure 5. Table 3 presents the estimated LOS results for the key study area intersection based on the projected future background 2008 weekday peak hour traffic volumes shown in Figure 5. The LOS results show that the study area intersections will continue to operate at LOS C or better during both AM /PM peak hours, with slight increases in average delay and no LOS changes. Table 3: Future Background 2008 Weekday Levels of Service Intersection AM Peak Hour PM Peak Hour Mid-PM Peak Hour Avg Avg Avg Unsignalized Vehicle Vehicle Vehicle Delay V/C Delay V/C Delay V/C Sec Veh Ratio LOS Sec Veh Ratio LOS Sec Veh Ratio LOS Canterbury �n/103'"Ave 9 6 0.18 A 10.6 0.11 B 9.4 0.09 A Critical Leg: EB Approach Canterbury Ln/ Inez St 9 g 0.01 A 9.3 0.01 A 9.6 0.02 A Critical Leg: WB Approach Tigard MITCH School Page 7 August 2, Z006 Site-Generated Traffic Volumes Figure lA shows the proposed site for the Tigard MITCH School, which will be a private school (K-8) located within the existing Calvin Presbyterian Church. Classes will be in session from 8:00 AM to 3:30 PM. The traffic analysis assumed 198 students, the maximum enrollment allowed by the school's charter. School staff anticipate the school will be in operation for two years before classes in all grades are in place and the maximum enrollment achieved. Access to the site will be provided via two main driveways providing access to the main parking area, one on SW Canterbury Lane and one on SW 103rd Avenue. The main entrance on SW Canterbury Lane is about 180 feet west of SW 103�d Avenue, and the main entrance on SW 103rd Avenue is about 280 feet north of SW Canterbury Lane. There is a small parking area and access on the west side of the school, but it is unlikely that there will be any need for school-related trips to use this driveway. The numbers of vehicle trips into and out of the proposed MITCH School site driveways were estimated using the weekday trip generation rates for Private School (K-8) (Land Use Code 534) published in the ITE Trip Generation Report(7th Edition), assuming the maximum enrollment of 198 students. Trip rates in this ITE publication are based on empirical observations performed at similar facilities located throughout the United States. Trip generation for K-8 Private Schools (Land Use Code 534) has unusually high correlation factors (R-squared) for peak hour trip generation: 0.96 and 0.86 for the AM and PM peaks, respectively. The AM peak hour trip generation is based on a formula, and the PM peak hour based on a trip rate. The MITCH school will continue its existing carpool-matching program, which could reduce the number of additional vehicle trips. However, due to the high correlation factors in the ITE data, no reduction was made to account for carpools. Trip generation calculations are included in the Appendix. While the MITCH School is expected to generate few if any vehicle trips during the weekday commute PM peak hour, to ensure a conservative analysis it was assumed that the school's PM commute peak hour trip generation would be 21 percent of the school peak hour trip generation rate for the AM peak hour. This factor was calculated by comparing the AM and PM peak hour trip generation rates per student for Private Schools (K-12), Land Use Code 536 in the Trip Generation Manual. (Land Use Code 534, K-8 Private Schools was used directly for the AM and mid-afternoon peak hour rates for the proposed school, but similar information is not provided for the PM peak hour.) Table 4 shows estimated peak hour trip generation for the MiTCH Charter School during the morning and evening commute peak hours, and the mid-afternoon school peak hour. It is estimated that the school will generate approximately 174 vehicle trips during a typical morning peak hour and 129 trips during the weekday afternoon school peak hour. These periods represent the bulk of daily trip generation, with few if any trips expected during the evening commute peak hour. Table 4: Estimated Peak Hour Trip Generation for Maximum Enrollment of MITCH School (Both Typical Commute Peak and School Peak Hours) AM Peak Hour School PM Peak Street System MITCH School Hour PM Peak Hour Total In Out Total In Out Total In Out ITE Land Use Code 534 174 96 78 129 61 68 27 13 14 (198 Students) Distribution and Assignment of Site Generated Traffic Traffic generated by the MITCH Charter School was assigned to the roadway network based on existing traffic patterns and students' zip codes, which were provided of by the school for the current 166 students. Approximately 30% of school-generated traffic is expected to be to and from the north and east via SW 103rd Avenue and SW McDonald Street, with 50% to and from the south via SW 103�d Avenue and 20% to and from the west via Hwy 99W. Pigure 6 displays the trip distribution and assignment based on existing traffic counts shown in Figure 3. Tigard MITCH Schoo! Page 8 August 2, 2006 Total Future 2008 Traffic Volumes and Levels of Service Total future 2008 weekday peak hour traffic volumes were estimated by adding the future background traffic volumes displayed in Figure 5 to the volumes that would be generated with full enrollment at the MITCH School shown in Figure 6. The resulting total future 2008 weekday peak hour traffic volumes are shown in Figure 7. Table 5 summarizes the results of total future 2008 weekday peak hour intersection analyses. The results in this table are similar to the results for the future background traffic conditions. One LOS change is projected, from LOS A to LOS B, based on a slight increase in average delay. Tra�c operations are projected to remain acceptable at LOS B or better at all intersections during the weekday morning and evening commute peak hours, and the mid-af�ernoon school traffic peak hour. Table 5: Total Future 2008 Weekday Levels of Service Intersection AM Peak Hour PM Peak Hour Mid-PM Peak Hour Avg Avg Avg Unsignalized Vehicle Vehicle Vehicle Delay V/C Delay V/C Delay V/C Sec Veh Ratio LOS Sec Veh Ratio LOS Sec Veh Ratio LOS Canterbury Ln/103rd Ave 10.9 0.21 B 10.8 0.11 B 9.7 0.10 A Critical Leg: EB Approach Canterbury Ln/ Inez St g 9 0.01 A 9.3 0.01 A 9.6 0.o2 A Critical Leg: WB Approach An analysis was conducted to determine if a separate eastbound leR turn lane would be warranted at the main SW Canterbury Lane entrance. These warrants are based on the number of vehicles turning left, the total approach volume, and the opposing conflicting volumes during the criticat peak hour (usually the PM peak hour). As shown in Table 6, based on the volume criteria in the AASHTD Policy on Geometric Design of Streets and Highways, projected future traffic volumes will not meet the criteria for an eastbound left turn lane at the main SW Canterbury Lane access. Table 6: Results of 2008 Eastbound Left Turn Warrant Ana) sis alon NW Cornell Road Projected 2008 PM Peak Hour AASHTO Manual Tota I Approach Left Opposing Approach Warrant Intersection Volume Turns Volume Volume Criteria Met? EB along SW Canterbury Lane at 136 21 88 > 450 No Prima Site Access 15% Total future 2008 southbound right turns at the site's SW 103rd Avenue access are very low (19 AM and 27 PM trips). Therefore, conducting right-turn lane warrants analyses would not be necessary. From our experience, traffic volume less than 40 vehicles during a peak hour do not meet warrants for requiring a separate right turn lanes, particularly on relatively low-volume streets such as SW 103�d Avenue where the estimated southbound daily volume is about 1,000 vehicles. Therefore, conducting a turn lane warrant analysis was not necessary. Queuing Analysis Queuing analysis was conducted at the intersection of SW Canterbury Lane/SW 103rd Avenue. The analysis of weekday queuing when school lets out reveals that the west leg of the intersection will have minimal (1 to 2 vehicles) queues with maximum school enrollment. The back-up caused by school will occur for only for a short period of time (15-20 minutes). The HCS model indicates that this backup will not extend back past the site's SW Canterbury Lane driveway, which is approximately 180 feet west of SW 103�d Avenue. Furthermore, if queues do develop, parents leaving school can stay inside the parking lot until the queue ahead clears. It should be noted that a majority of the traffic from the SW Canterbury Lane access is expected to turn right toward Hwy 99W. These drivers should have minimal delays (< 10 seconds). Tigard MITCH Schoo! Page 9 August 2, 2006 CIRCULATION PLAN, PARKING AND SITE ACCESS Figure 1A shows the existing site layout. The school will be located within the existing church on the site, which has approximately 177 on-site parking spaces, including about 30 in a west parking area presumed to be a staff parking lot and about 147 in the main parking lot east of the church. The main lot has two driveways, one approximately 20 feet wide onto SW 103`� Avenue and one about Z8 feet wide onto SW Canterbury Lane. Both driveways have ample clearance from the SW 103�d Avenue/SW Canterbury Lane intersection (approximately 180 feet to the main SW Canterbury Lane driveway and Z80 feet to the SW 103�d Avenue driveway), and both provide at least two car lengths of internal stacking area. Both adjacent streets are flat and straight in the immediate vicinity of the site. The City should install school zone warning signs along the site's SW 103rd $C,HQOL Avenue frontage, as shown to the right. (School zone signage along the SW Canterbury Lane frontage is not needed because the speed humps adjacent to the school already ensure speeds consistent with school zones). With the new SPEED speed zone laws recently adopted by the Oregon State Legislature, the only supplemental sign allowed for speed zone signage adjacent to the school is "School Days 7 AM - 5 PM." School zone signage applies for both public and private schools. Bicycle Parking Needs SCNOOL AAl'S The City parking requirements equate to 48 bicycle parking spaces (6 per classroom). This is excessive, because the geographic area of the MITCH school ��M-5PM is much greater than a typical elementary school. Even if the MITCH School were a typical public elementary, the City's bicycle parking requirements are substantially more than either Beaverton or Tualatin. Beaverton would require Z2 spaces for a school the size of the MITCH school with maximum 198 students (1 space per 9 students), less than half the number required by Tigard. Tualatin would require 1 space per 5 students, or 40 spaces the MITCH school. Either of these parking standards would be excessive for the MITCH School, a citywide school. Bicycle parking demand at the MITCH school will be generated almost exclusively by students from the residential area immediately surrounding the school. Based on zip code information provided by the school representatives, 55 students (about 1/3 of the student body) are from the zip code area including the site. If 10 percent of these students rode their bikes - which is a conservatively high mode split estimate as can be seen by visiting a typical elementary school -six spaces would easily accommodate bicycle parking demand for the MITCH School. CONCLUSIONS Based on the results of the analysis described in this report, it is concluded that the proposed MITCH Charter School can be operated at the Calvin Presbyterian Church without adversely affecting tra�c operations or safety near the site. Furthermore, key intersections and roadways in the study area will continue to operate at acceptable Levels of Service with the school's maximum enrollment of 198 students. The internal circulation system serves the site well, with driveways set far enough back from adjacent intersections to avoid potential traffic conflicts. One specific safety measure that should be considered by the City regardless of this application is to trim or have the property owner trim a few bushes in the landscaping that affect sight distance from the two main driveways. If you have any questions related to the data or analysis contained in this report, please contact me directly at (503) 690-8080 ext. 1365. ��ED PROFFS� Sincerely, ��, �NGtNEF9 ip�9 � 26 PE � How r Roll, P.E. Transportation Engineer �-� OR GON,� v �/ �y18 i99 P� Attach m e nts ti0 W AR� EXPIRATION DA7E:�1-� -�6� �� Figure 1: Site Area And Vicinity Map �V+! Fair#�aven St ' �,r SvY t_tmara 5t d- U L 4 -- 9� `'� Sl�€�gewond � L � � � - } ��L �t - � d 'n SW McDona{d Si – -- - } ,�.� a Q Q t `��° d r �fi`+ Tigard � �- f , a � D �, U tv�cF�i_ � � '9� m � � �L � � � � *SW 1neZ St – Q J �� SW $un Moun�`� Rd � -� �� Q SYV Mwdask-�_ v m � �.,'�' -�p � �r' at �j' Q �d� � g � �� `� � z`�� "� Q' � c3n �`�ga'� � s1dc Fiooaview�y L o g �G� King City �4'�� t Ka61e St g � q�T�r�� L � R° S� Naeve Si � � � � Tigard MITCH School Proposed Site �— - ,..� + ,.�,�,a;r,,�r'�- ,+li#.:=_ a'�I i��.,,s` .• -1 . . �*- �+�'*'� � - •. ,,�t � �, # �, _�, '.��;�� `;!`!-�--� ��?'�-.�7� k' �'�, � ��_r '' ;'�� "�� , -# � " r i,y� � 1 : k � -� r ��•:y� r ' =l f' � '� i� � ! /�� Le� ��'� 4 •"'r• 9� t� �� ,� +1� -+�;��?w �, , rR � �+�� a '� �.�}'#'- �yR"�'�� _ ' ` _ �T� :�� ..w._3_ �� y" �--�t! . - #�� + � ' � �� . �� ,� , a . r �� I '�� "– , '?i � ..�- - �rr _ . � - ,T i y �1' ,�; � _ - * � �,�' �• * }` � +��' `-c '� 1 '.�,-�i' 't. f' ,� ;'�"��r, �'.� % ,�a+►. �� t ;,"4,• '�'�`�� ,'!�� .��-�.. ,'�1�!Pr 1, � � ► • � �� }��;. �r � �,'� �� K '�' � : f:. .� �*r�7- ' �, �'�� -# �k - ��.-� , {�_ +�� .' ? � . ,,k��• � ��,� �� a r .:'i � �r -s r;: ,j`�S ' � � i � K��'�e.�,•� ► ,�� '� ��- �� J �� ;� _ � _ �.. � . .r y-* ti_ , :� �. . �: � '.�, �r � � �� l'��'�'+� �• "1��s'� ,' �j a-`w r ' #r V�.t�' ! � ti'- . � � -- � �-� �� . s }. ` �_it �•w� � 1� ; � 3' �� . .��• �` ' �,� ��t- _ _ /�� ,��"�� , , . \ �. � �__. t� „ '�'+' ,�:� � � � . ��' _�j,�'��.�.'�'� � � � ` �� i��,t w�, ' i#�� , � � i� �" . �91�_ . .��'`d � '�r N ,�.,E� "�!'� ,,".�_ ,.a,� ..+,,. _ : �' ;� � w , +�a � Dran�n Not To Scale ,,} � '� a � �; , . � �. ��', i• �� } M"Ta � 7r.x° •�.' y ��y�# 1 g ��' � � f .� 1 _ �-- � w*�� L..�� • �� '_'�1- l�.-��`��y•�,. ,3 Proposed Site � � C� OR06.062.T01 Tigard MITCH School � � � E ,�,.,,. Figure 1A: Site Area Map of Existing Calvin Presbyterian Church Main Driveway SW 103rd Avenue -� :�..�.�.._ - -- � - �� .' E � � a�;,, �-� q .�.•�i' .w.,. . - � �� . _ Ri � J a L �w s � ` ' � - �A . . � � _ �� ,.. : a� � ., � , c � � � � � � � . . ,• � ii � .�f � ... w� - � C °� � � � � � $ r:� _�'"R �y * � I f � � a�a� R f�� + i' f °_ �� Main Driveway a �,.,��r,, _ r � � _ - _ � � �._: r._... -�. _ �- 4; - r.- �` - I� I _� � �•' 3 �, s - ' { �.� Secondary # � ��"� Driveway � ro, _ ' � : - i � �,,: s'� �!' ,X � �s �� . .�� ,�. �fr�''ti �'� � � ' � � ��..�`�� _ � � � N �� OR06.062.T01 Tigard MITCH School � En,i�nec�i Figure 2: Location of Proposed Tigard MITCH School And Surrounding Roadway Network _ ;: ; �� i I �� arrsi�S� �',r,y--- - , �V McDonald �t --� f � ��df� � � 89W �1 ,�,� ct � '� �Z` SW A R'U � � �� C O ki � '99W 7 � TIgBf d � � ;r, 0 /� f SW Inez St r 5 W Cantarbury Ln SW �1►usdock W SW Murdock Ln d d d d Lr L � O O gW Murdock St � � � � � N Drawing Not To Scale Traffic Signal � Stop Sign �- Proposed Site � Driveway � C� OR06.062.T01 Tigard MITCH School � Figure 3: Weekday Peak Hour Traffic Volumes In The Vicinity Of The Proposed Tigard MITCH School .- �arde St �'� � _ ��v�Tc�onald � �.. ° v� � � � � v° 0 M N 99W � _ ��6� �� r' � 2(4) � Q� n� Ct � � � o c t� °� o v � � Q� � July 2006 y� AM/PM 0 3-4 School PM Peak Hour peaks �i � 99W 7 . Q Tigard -° m 0 �f SW Inez St r SW Cantarbury Ln SW Mucd��k'°r � � N" SW Murdock Ln � j `Y Q °v� �35)90� � *�� (3a)4a� � � t � �$O�J � °, m (1q) v� � � � July 2006 ., AM/PM N� peaks 3-4 School PM Peak Hour N Drawing Not To Scale Traffic Signal � Stop Sign � Proposed Site � Driveway � AM(P�t)Peak Hour Volumes (Afrernoon School)Peak Hour Volumes C��"� OR06.062.T01 Tigard MITCH School � �,� , Figure 4: Traffic Collisions In The Vicinity of The Proposed Tigard MITCH School (Jan 2001 to Dec 2005) �� -- �arde St �'�y , ��Donald St ��— I �d,,� i �, x�,=o Angle=0 Fix Obj.=0 9� S/S=0 � nda Ct PDO=0 SW AT7g INJ=0 �' Crash Rate=0.0 � � a� � � 0 4` � ssw � . Q Tigard � M r;'�:' o � SW Inez St �, - 5W Can�erbury Ln SW Murdock P! SV+1 Murdock Ln d � Q Q RE=O L L � � _ Angle=0 SW Mardock St ri,c obj.=z � 3 S/S=0 rn rn PDO=2 INJ=0 Crash Rate=0.38 N Key: RL' =Rear-End S!S =Sideswipe Drawing Not"I'o Scale Fix Obj. =Fixed Object Traffic Signal � PDO =Property Damage INJ =Injury Stop Sign � FAT =Fatality � Acc Rate =Average Number of Incidents Per Proposed Site Million Entering Vehicles Dnveway � C�T'—� OR06.062.T01 Tigard MITCH School � � � � , ,. Figure 5: Future 2008 Background Weekday Peak Hour Traffic Volumes _ , ; �arde 5ti �'� ��P ►v��6onald � � v� �� -o M N �9V1/ �' � '�` ��6� �2�2� I � � Z�2� ,,� �� nda Ct � � � �� , o c m Q� �� 3-4 School PM Peak Hour 0 �i � 99W � . Q Tigard �° m` f�;. 0 SW Inez St � S W Cantarbury Ln � 5W �usdock far � � M�-' SW7vlur�s ock Ln � j � �, d' �� (37)94� � �� 3�)4� .- t � � � 3 (s3) �� m (20)� a`o� � � � V� N.`. 3-4 School PM Peak Hour N Drawing Not l�o Scale Traftic Signal .'�. Stop Sign � Proposed Site � Driveway � AM(PM)Peak Hour Volumes (Afternoon School)Peak Hour Volumes C� OR06.062.T01 Tigard MITCH School F � .�,. Figure 6: Trip Distribution And Assignment iarde St �'�y SW McDonald �r� � � � � M � 99NY � n� Ct �� 'p�� 30% 0 3-4 School PM Peak Hour k� � � ssw 20°io d � Tigard -8 m 0 SW Inez 5t r S W Cantsrbury Ln SW Murdock l�' � a SW Murdock Ln 50% ;' d � d L � �2�2� � t � � � � n � � v in Site-Generated Trattic 3-4 School PM Peak Hour ►n Out AM Peak 9h 7R M;a- N afternoon 6l h8 Dra�cing Not"fo Scale Peak � Traffic Signal PM Peak 13 14 Stop Sign �- Proposed Site � Driveway � AM(PM)Peak Hour Vulwnes (Afrernoon School)Peak Hour Volumes C� OR06.062.T01 Tigard MITCH School � � � � , �_,. Figure 7: Total Future 2008 Weekday Peak Hour Traffic Volumes �arde S� �',� -_ �l��c�onald � �x � �4 � � � .� o n N �(6) �, � 99MI (7) �2(2) � � � 2�2� ,� �� nda Ct � � � � �n v � o v � �� v 0 3-4 School PM Peak Hour �� 9gW1 � ' ° Q Tigard � � ,�; 0 SW Inez St r-- SW Cantarbury Ln SNJ Murdock F3` �v M�C SW Murdock Ln N j � � '� Q' �N (37)94� 8 � i� �32)42 � `J t � � � � (53) �o � (zo)� ,o a� � � V a�n �� 3-4 School PM Peak Hour N Drawing Not To Scale Traffic Signal � Stop Sign � Proposed Site � Driveway � AM(PM)Peak Hour Volumes (Afternoon School)Peak Hour Volumes �� OR06.062.T01 Tigard MITCH School �� E��.pu�:�. .. STUDY AREA TYPICAL VIEWS MITCH School Access Points Tigard,Oregon _ ' � � �r 6 � �� 1��• F . � � �� . . � . .. . . ,: ' '{� � r_��•4 � #1: View EAST along Canterbury Lane from western site access (bush needs to be trimmed) ��jr�' '�'�- , ��. "•� ..; �"- � ~ �` �+�� v �� -- I � " - - '" _y;= � - ,�'�►� _ � , �,�r,,, #2: View WEST along Canterbury Lane from western site access (bush needs to be trimmed) _ #�� . ��_ �,� _ `._ � '1� 1( aI. J� -,r- � } �%�' •� .� �j�r `�� _ _ � � � �� «L � �_�� •� � t � f � #3: View to EAST along Canterbury from main entrance (clear to intersection) Photos Taken by CTS Engineers, Page 1 STUDY AREA TYPICAL VIEWS MITCH School Access Points Tigard,Oregon �_ t —=�:,r,si; ' i `� r�''�„��'� 'iC: ?4`- ,`',�e� t �-�.i A.. a4' 9 ' . �' 4 i ' _' .___. _ 'f• � i � . � � "a� �.-�r. #4: View to WEST along Canterbury from main entry (> 250 ft 10'from edge of pavement) � � ��_,: __ �. +�� r{ . ,,a�i �-�,��"�y��Y•1 - � „�F"'� .�r. -.� � °� ` - - � � �°_—_` .. - _ #5: View to NORTH along 103�d (360 ft to flag, 15' from edge of pavement) r � p _#� � r ,t I ,.+_ . .�, ��. �� r.. <N4'� _ ; , :�.:� � _ � .,.��- , �-� - .. ;. � � `-� �> i - . . . . '. �'y.� 6! ` - . . .`�,a-,f,E�. ..�'2_ `s '��'7� - �i ` � �. �..� .�� `'��. Y.�-, "�1y t Y "" � i►•,� �, '"��,� �,_� r � .t�'�,l . . z -�r�... `�v1�5..kr L- _. f�.:. ... � #6: View to SOUTH along 103�d (> 350 ft available 15' from edge of pavement IF lower branches trimmed) Photos Taken by CTS Engineers,Page 2 Anafysis of Crashes in Study Area, 20� 1-2��5 Project 6 032 Tigard MITCH School Accldenf Analysis Wo�►csbeet 2oo�-2aos Irrtersectlon� SW 103rd Avenue 8 SW Carrterbury Ln Perc�nt PetCent p�aperty Rear End 0 095 damage Only 2 10096 Mgle 0 056 Injury 0 0% Tum 0 090 Total 2 Fixed Obj 2 100% Total 2 PM Peak Hour 320 ADT 2,909 f�ssumed to be PM Peak Hour/1 f percent Accldent Rate= (Number of Accidents)/5)/{ADTx 365)'1,000,000 Vehides Accident Rate= 0.38 Average number of accidents per million entering veFi�cfes Trip Generation Worksheets TRIP GENERATION WORKSHEET Development: MlTCH School Size: 198 Studenfs ITE Land Use Code: Private School {K-8) Code 534 Variabie: Number of Studenis (S) Total Weekday Trips Not Given Enter Exit Total Vehicle Tri s N/A N/A N/A Site Distribution N/A N/A N/A Weekday AM Peak Hour Trips Ln(T) = 1.�Q Ln(S) - 0.13 Enter Exit Total Vehicle Tri s 96 78 174 Site Distribution 55% 45% 100% Weekday PM Trips (Peak Hour of Generator} T= 0.58x S}+14.03 Enter Exit Total Vehicle Tri s 61 68 129 Site Distribution 47% 53% 100% Weekday PM Peak Hour (21°/a of AM Peak Rate) (Note: MlTCH School is not expected fo generate ANY PM Peak Hr Trips. This information is included onl fo show fhat AM peak is worst case) Enter Exit Total ehicle Tri s 13 14 27 Site Distribution 47% 53% 10Q% CTS Engineers,Inc. TRIP GENERATION WORKSHEET RATES Development: MITCH School Size: 198 Students ITE Land Use Code: Private Schooi (K-12), Code 536 (7th Edi#ion Variable: Number of Students (S} NOTE: THIS WORKSHEET USED ONLY TO ESTIMATE THE RATlO OF PM TO AM TRIP GENERATION Weekday AM Peak Hour Trips T = 0.79x S Enter Exit Total Vehicle Tri s 95 61 156 Site Distribution 61% 39% 100% Weekday PM Peak Hour Trips T= 0.17x S Enter Exit Total Vehicle Trips 15 19 34 Site Distributio� 43% 57% 100% RATlO OF PM TO AM TRIP GENERATION = 34/15S = 22% CTS Engineers,lnc. Left Turn Lane Warrant Analysis CTS Engineers, Inc. Project: MITCH School DAT�: July 31, 2006 Location: Canterbury Ln& Main Entrance Analyst: HR Scenario: Total Future AM Traffic check for EBL Speed: 25 % Left Turns 15% Opposing Volume: 88 Required Advancing Volume #N/A Advancing Volume: 136 Left Turns: 21 Meets Warrant: #NIA Left Turn WaRant Curves 1000 , - �—tnterpolated 15%Curve yap ------AASHTO 20%Curve 800 ` ♦ Assessed Volumes --,� � 700 ,'. � 600 �� — _ c 500 ,` - O 400 ' Q - , Q 300 �,�; � - ,� 200 100 Left Turn Lanes Should Be Cansidered Fo[Volumes Above Curve � � ��..� 0 ._-—' -; -- -:_ •--- —�'----� 0 100 200 300 400 500 600 700 800 90a 1000 Advancing Volurne AASH70 Guide for Left-Turn Lanes On Two-Lane Highways 40 MPH Advancin Volume Opposing Left Turns Volume 5% 14% 20% 30% 10Q 72Q 515 390 340 2QQ 64Q 470 350 305 400 510 380 275 245 600 410 305 225 200 800 330 24Q 180 160 Sowce:AASHTO.A Policy on GeomeVic Design of Highway and Streets(2001) Shaded Values tr�terpolated Warrant Curve Required Advancing Advancin Voiume Opposin Advancin Opposing Lower Left Turns U er Lawer #N/A #N/A Volume 10% 15% 20% Actual 88 #N/A 1d0 515 447 390 Upper 100 447 200 470 405 35� 40U 380 323 275 6�0 305 261 225 8Q0 240 207 180 O:1Projecfs CTS16.051-6.07416.462 Tigard MITCH Schoollworksheets16.062 AASHTO Left Turn Warrant 8/1I2006 Existing Weelcday Pealc Hour and Mid-afternoon I�eak Hour Turn Movement Counts Type d peak hoir being reported:IntersecGon Peak Melhod fw delermining pealc hour.Tolal Enlering Vduma INTERSEC710N: SW 103rd—SW CanlerDury Lane QC JOB#: 10782707 WEATHER: DATE:7Y2$l2pp6 31 105 8.7 2.9 � + * � Peak-Hour:7:15 AM--8:15 AM � + * � ZZ 9 0 9.1 11.1 0.0 J t �. d i L 39 �. 86 � � o r o [ SW Canterbury Lane ] S•3 ♦1.2 J t o.o ♦ p.p 0 � 0.83 t o 0.0�► `'.�.;�: « o.a 126 .► 40 7 r 0 .► 0 ::r.:n=:f 2A .►5.0� .>`- �. D.0 y 0.0 '1 f P :i'•'.....f�, 'f f r' �s ts o `� ��-''� o.o io.s o.o �i ;� � + t � ��=�;-..;"��T'�`� � a t 49 35 �°+�'�-'.�*``°�Sr'�� 6.1 5.7 [ SW 703rd ] [ SW 103rd J � o � �� - � � � __. __ �� `��_ � . � , � o ��V 9 + � r �� , �, * � � o � � NORTH � � � � � I� � a � � �9�!y�aG siv 4��yA�9G � •r ~ � � �� * � � � � •s��c,ao s�-r 5-MIN COUNT SW 703rd SW 103rd SW Canterbury Lan SW Canterbury Lane PERIOD Northbound 3outhDound Eastbound estboun �OTAL HOURLY BEGINkING AT Left Thru Ri ht U Leit Thru Ri ht U LeR Thru Ri ht U Left Thru R' ht U 70TALS 7:00 AM 6 2 0 0 1 3 10 0 5 0 Q 0 27 7:75AM 4 2 D 0 1 5 23 0 . 71 `. U 0 0 46 7:30 AM 6 8 0 0 2 5 24 0 70 0 0 0 55 7:45 AM 2 5 0 2 77 0 0 0 58 t 86 B:00 AM 4 4 0 Q 5 5 13 0 2 0 0 0 33 192 8:15AM 5 4 0 0 0 3 8 0 5 D 0 0 25 771 8:30 AM 5 7 D 0 4 3 10 0 4 0 0 0 33 149 8:45 AM 3 3 U 0 6 3 11 0 11 0 0 0 37 128 PEAK 15-MIN Norihbound Southbound Eastbound Westbound FLOW RATES Left Thru Right U Left Thru Right U Lek Thru Rtght U LeR Thru Right U TOTAL All Vehicles 8 20 0 0 4 28 104 0 68 0 0 0 232 Heavy Trucks o 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 o n o a o PedesUians o 0 0 0 0 eicycles Railroad Stopped 8uses Counter Comments: Reporl generated on 728l2006 SOt/ftCE:Quality Cants,LlC(http:Nwww.quailycounts.nel) Type o(peak Aax being reporled:Inlersection Peak MeUiod fa delermining peak hnur,Total Entering Vdume IN7ERSECTION: SW 103rd–SW Canterbury Lane QC JOB q: 10182702 WEATHER: DATE: 7125/2606 � �+ * � Peak-Hour:4:45 PM--5:45 PM � a * � �ze ao 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 �► i 4 J i 4 zoo � 35 � t o ♦ o [ SW Canterbury Lane ] o.o �.2.9 1 t o.o ♦ 0.0 o ♦ 0.83 r 0 0.0♦ f.�:`' • o.o 62 y 27 7 � 0 ■► 0 - - 1.6 ♦0.0.� �- r 0.0 .► 0.0 1 f P :� �Y� 1 ♦ r` � 72 18 0 �� D.0 0.0 0.0 � + * � �;�'� �f��,;�`'rt 0 0 0 67 9D �..: .. � SW 103rd ] ` y � [ SW 103rd � �.,.,�t �� .,�`��` � 1.� _ . . . o �. �� y� �' � ,,.3. .+ a � � t , ��, o . oi � � � , * � � u � NORTH � � �� J L�. � a � � Rq��z\a� + :. ` 4�05.�,90 —i � � �� •s��c,�NO sH�r S-MIN COUNT SW 103rd SW 103rd SW Canterbury Lan SW Canterbury Lane PER10D Northbound Southbound Eastbound estbound TOTAL HOURLY BEG{NNING AT Left Thru Ri ht U Left Thru RI ht U !eft Thru Ri ht U LeR Thru Rt M U TOTALS 2:00 PM 2 6 0 0 3 6 1U 0 3 D D 0 30 2:75 PM 4 5 0 0 7 10 9 0 1 D 0 0 36 2:30 PM 3 3 0 0 3 t0 2 0 6 0 0 0 27 2:45 PM 5 3 0 0 4 8 4 0 3 D 0 0 27 120 3:00 PM 7 2 0 0 7 7 7 0 7 0 0 0 37 127 3:15 PM 3 3 0 0 0 5 16 0 4 fl 0 0 31 122 3:30 PM 7 3 0 0 0 18 16 0 3 0 0 Q 47 142 3:45 PM 6 6 0 0 4 9 11 0 5 0 0 0 41 15fi 4:00 PM B 2 0 0 6 23 9 0 6 0 0 0 54 173 4:15 PM B 5 0 0 5 15 1Q 0 3 0 0 0 46 18B 4:30 PM 11 6 0 � 8 27 10 0 7 0 0 U 69 2'10 4:45 PNt 14 4 0 0 5 30 8 0 B 0 Q 0 69 238 5:00 PM 22 2 0 0 10 25 B D B 0 0 0 73 257 5:15 PM 74 4 0 0 72 38 B 0 6 0 0 0 82 293 6:30 PM 0 'f 35 11 0 7 96 320 5:45 PM 23 6 0 0 2 26 8 0 4 0 0 D 69 320 PEAiC 15-MIN Northbound Southbound Eastbound Westbound FLOW RATES Left Thru Right U Lett Thru RigM U Left Thru Right U LeR Triru Right U TOTAL All Vehicles 88 32 0 0 52 740 44 0 28 0 0 0 384 Heavy Trucks o 0 0 0 o D a o a o 0 o a PedesVians o 0 0 0 0 Bicycles Railroad Stopped Buses Counfer Comments: Report generatad on 7l26f2006 SOURCE:Qualily Coun�,LLC{hitp:Hwww.qua6lycounts.nel) Type ol peak how being raportad:Inlersedion Peak Malhod fa delertninirg peak hqur:Toial Enlering Volume tNTERSECTION: SW 103rd—SW Inez St. QC JOB#: 101827D3 WEATHER: DATE: 7/25/2006 31 102 12.9 �.9 � + * � Peak-Hour:7:15 AM—8:15 AM � + * � 0 29 2 0.0 10.3 50.0 .� i 4 .► i �. o � o � � s w a [ sw inez st. ] o.o �.o.o� t ioo.o• so.o 0 • 0.87 « 0 0.0� �:�` t 0.0 � i 0 7 r 2 y 6 -__-- D.0 ♦0.0 i �'.�- � O.D � 33.3 '1 t P �`=i�,�� 'f ♦`•r` 0 t00 4 �� [?� Q.0 2.0 25.0 >� f-.,,Vi� * � a * � _ - C::�.,. .•-`� + � ��<<<;��;:,.:'�,�;��„``� 9.7 2.9 31 104 ...- . ( SW 703rd ) ��$ T� '� ��F ( SW 103rd ] � � � � € ; E �1 1� � ��_�.; � _� � a � � � o �'�`; � ~ � s � ' 4 , t � � 4 � � NORTH � � � � � � � � a � � 4po 9`9p � a� ~ � � �� * � � � � SEE LEGEND SHEET 5-MIN COUNT SW 103rd SW 103rd SW Inez SL SW inez St. PERIOD (Northbound Southbound Eastbound estbound TOTAL HOURI.Y BEGINNIMG AT LeR Thru Ri ht U Left Thni Right U Le(t Thru R ht U Lek Thru Ri M U TOTAL3 7:00 AM D 12 0 0 4 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 16 7:15 AM 0 28 0 0 6 0 0 0 0 i 0 0 33 7:30 AM 0 29 3 0 6 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 38 •4 0 2 1 7 8 0 0 0 0 0 0 2 4D 127 8:00 AM 0 17 0 1 9 0 0 0 0 7 0 0 28 139 8:15 AM 0 i 3 D 0 4 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 17 123 830 AM 0 15 1 0 6 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 22 107 6:45 AM 0 12 1 0 9 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 22 89 PEAK 15-MIN Northbound Southbound Eastbound Westbound FLOW RATES Left 7'hru Right U Left Thru RigM U Left Thru Right U Leit Thru Right U TOTAL All VehiCleS 0 112 4 4 32 0 0 0 0 0 D 8 160 Heavy Trucks o 0 0 4 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 A 8 Pedestrians o 0 0 0 0 Bicycles Raiiroad Siopped Buses Counter Comments: Report generafed on 7/28I20D6 SOURCE:Qualily Co�1s,LLC(htlp:llwww.qualirywunts.nel) Type d peek hour being reported:Inlerseclion Peak Method for detemaning paek hour:Total Entenng Volume INTERSECTION: SW 103rd--SW Inez St. aC JOB p: 10182704 WEATHER: DATE:7/2512DD6 t57 40 0.0 2.5 � + * � Peak-Hour:4:45 PM—5:45 PM � a * � o �s� a o.o a.o o.o J i 4 J i �. o + o � � 2 �. s [ SW tnez Sc ] a.o «o.o� t o.o � o.o o • 0.85 r o o.o• "��,' • a.o 0 ♦ 0 7 � 4 y 4 - _, e. 0.0 ♦OA 1 - � 0.0 �► 0.0 --.�..:i;Ja. '1 ♦ I' 1 t /' E � D 38 4 =- � 0.0 2.6 0.0 ♦ ♦ � ��`�•e �:� ,.�'�"' � ♦ * � 161 42 :K.:3�``.?,��;�`�,�, O.D 2.4 [SW 703rd J � l � SW 103rd J � o � ��_�.� �.��r � � � � � �..� �� s � = � J/,�_� L 0 �t-, 0 y /�7�S1� F \v•� � �/ r � �, , . ,- � o � NORTH � � �� I� � � � � a L.� � `�y��4o � �� « � � r-� * � � � � •SEELEGEND SHEET 5-MIN COUNT SW 193rd SW 103rd SW Inez SL SW Inez St. PERIOD Northboun Southbound Eastbaund estbound TOTAI. HOURLY BEGINNtNG AT Left Thru Ri ht U Left Thru Ri ht U Left Thru R ht U Left Thru Ri ht U TOTALS 2:00 PM 0 3 6 0 3 0 0 0 0 10 0 3 25 2:15 PRA 0 8 10 3 8 0 0 U 0 9 0 1 37 2:30 PM 0 3 8 4 3 0 0 0 0 2 0 5 25 2:45 PM 0 4 10 B 2 0 0 0 0 4 0 3 29 116 3:00 PM 0 7 5 2 5 0 0 0 0 6 0 6 31 122 3:15 PM 0 9 1 6 12 U 0 0 U 1 0 0 29 114 3:30 PM 0 14 0 0 21 D 0 D D 0 D 0 35 124 3:45 PM 0 12 2 D 13 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 27 12? 4`00 PM 0 9 1 0 27 0 0 0 0 2 0 0 39 130 4:'I5 PM 0 t i 3 0 19 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 34 135 4:30 PM 0 14 1 U 34 0 U 0 0 2 0 2 53 153 4:45 PM D 9 fl 0 31 0 0 0 0 3 0 1 44 170 5:06 PM 9 7 D D 35 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 42 173 5:1 PM 8 3 0 48 0 0 0 0 199 5:30 PM D 14 1 0 43 0 0 0 0 1 D 0 59 205 5:45 PM 9 8 0 D 27 0 0 0 0 1 D 0 3fi 197 PEAK 15-MiN Northbound Southbound Eastbound Westbound FLOW itATES LeH Thru Right U Left Thru Right U Left Thru RigM U LeR Thru Righ! U �OTAL All Vehicles 0 32 12 0 132 0 0 0 0 0 D 4 24U Heavy Trucks o 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Pedestrians o o D o 0 Bicydes Railroad Stopped Buses Counter Comments: Reporl genereted on 7f28f2006 SOURCE:�ueiity Couils,LLC(htlp:Jhvww.quaNycounts.neQ Type of peak hoir be{ng reported:Mtersection Peak Method for determining peak hour.Tdal Entering Volume INTERSECTION: Church Drwy 1 8 2-SW Canterbury Lane QC JOB#: 10182705 WEATHER: DATE:7/25/2006 � � * � Peak-Hour:7:15 AM--8:15 AM � °'�° * � t o 0 0.0 o.a o.o � � v .1 i 4 40 � t � t a � 38 [ SW Centerbury LanB ] 5.0 ♦Q.0� - t' D.0 t 5.t 725 ♦ 0.85 �' 39 3.2♦ '�;:>' ♦ 5.S 128 .► D 7 � 0 �► 125 -- - 3.2 ♦0.0 7 `- r D.0 � 3.2 h * i' :.ri ��LLc. 1 f r' � o 0 0 � -� � �o.o o.o o.o� 0 0 .?� .��.��'-`'��3`�� o 0 0 0 [ Church Drwy l 8 2 ] �� _�P y�e�� [ Church Orwy 1 8 2 ] � 1.� � � � �, .��_ �� , � � � � � '�� " � i , a-► 4 „ r � o � � IJORTFt � � J � �-- � l� � a � � 4�oy��90 � � �� . o � � � � � � * � •s��c,�+�sH�r 5-MIN COUNT Church Drwy 1&2 Church Drwy 1 3 2 SW Canterbury Lan SW Canterbury Lane PERIOD Norlhbound Southboun Easibound estbound jOTAL HOURLY BEf31NNING AT Left Thru Ri ht U Lek Thru Ri ht U Left Thru Ri ht U LeR Thru Ri 1�t U TOTALS 7:00 AM 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 i5 0 D 9 0 24 7:15 AM 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 32 0 0 t1 U 44 7:30 AM 0 0 6 0 0 0 0 37 0 0 10 0 47 7:45 AM 0 0 0 0 Q 0 40 D 9 D 49 7 4 8:00 AM D 0 0 0 0 1 0 16 0 0 9 D 2fi 1&6 e:�srw+ o 0 0 0 0 0 o ia o o a o zz iaa 8:30 AM 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 13 0 0 8 D 27 118 8:45 AM 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 21 0 0 7 1 29 98 PEAK 15-MIN NoMbound Southbound Eastbound Wesfbound FLOW RATES Lek Thru Right U Left Thru Right U Left Thru Rtght U LeR Thru Right U TOTAL All Vehides 0 o U 0 0 0 o tso 0 0 36 0 196 #ieavy Trucks o 0 0 0 o D D o 0 0 0 0 0 Pedestrians o 0 0 0 0 Bicydes Railroad Stopped Buses Courtfer Commen[s: Reporl generated on 7RBR006 SOURCE:Qualiry Counts,LLC(hripJhvww.quaiitycounls.nel) Type of peak hoir being reported:Intersection Peak Melhod for dalarmining peak hour 7otai Entering Vdume INTERSECT30N: Church Drwy 1&2-SW Canterbury Lane QC JOB#: 10182706 WEATHER: �ATE:7125J2006 � ; * � Peak-Hour:4_30 PM--5:30 PM � a °t° � z o 0 0.0 0.o a.o .+ i t► J i t. 2 �. 2 � t 0 �. o ( SW Cantenbury Len9 ] o.o ♦o.o� t o.0 t o.o o .► 0.50 • 0 0.o r �:'• • 0.0 2 ♦ 0 .� s 0 �► 0 0.0 ♦0.0 7 ��- �. 0.0 ♦ 0.0 �, • � = ';; -� • r 0 0 0 ;' � o.o o.o o.o � + t � `'� ,.,,�� ;�; i t � 0 0 '��:.c;?x;�?�,�'.> o.a o.o � Church Drwy 1 8 2 ] �-Q � ( Church Drwy 1&2 ] � o � �.��,�� .�� ,� ,�- � � �..� =._� �� ..�� , . � : � o �� o ~ � r � ' ti � � � o � � NORTH � � J 1� � J L.� � + � � `4'�y 90 � y ■0 . � � � * � � � � •SEE LEGElHTSHEET 5-MIN COUNT Church �rwy i 8 2 Church Drwy 7&2 SW Canterbury Lan SW Canterbury Lane HOURLY PERIOD Northbound Southbound Eastbound estbound TO7AL TpTALS BEGINNiNG AT Left Thru RI ht U LeTt Thru Ri ht U Left Thru Ri ht U Left Thru Rf ht U 2:OD PM D 0 0 0 0 D D 0 0 0 0 0 0 2:15PM 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 2:30 PM D 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 D 0 2:45 PM 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 3:00 PM D 0 0 0 D 0 0 0 0 0 0 2 2 2 3:15PM 0 0 0 0 D 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 3 3:30 PM D D D 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 3 3:45 PM 0 0 0 0 D 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 3 4:00 PM D 0 0 0 0 0 0 D 0 0 0 0 0 1 4:15PM 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Q 0 0 0 0 4:30 P 0 0 1 1 2 2 4:45 PM 0 0 0 0 -0 0 D U D 0 0 D U 2 SOOPM 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 1 3 5:15PM 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 U Q 0 0 1 4 5:30 PM 0 d 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 D 0 0 2 5:45 PM 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 2 PEAK 15-M!N Northbound Southbound Eastbound Westbound TOTAL FLOW RATES Lefl Thru RigM U Left Thru Rtght U Left Thru RIgM U Left Thru Right U All Vehicles 0 0 0 D 0 4 4 0 0 0 0 0 8 Heavy TruCks D 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 U Pedestrians o 0 0 0 0 Bicycles Railroad Stopped Buses Counter Comments: Report gene2ted on 7lZBl2006 SOURCE:Wality CamLs,LLC(htlp:/hvww.quaFtycounts.neQ Type of peak how being reported:Intersection Peak Method for determining peak hour.Total Enl�ing Vdume {NTERSECTION: SW 1D3rd--Church Drwy 3 QC JOB#: 1Q182707 WEATNER: DATE: 7Y25/2006 3i �03 peak-i-lour:7:95 AM--8:15 AM '2•s 3.9 � i t '� t 0 31 0 � �o.o �2.s o.o ✓ i t� d i 4 o �. 0 � t 0 �+ o ( Church Drwy 3 j 0.0 �.o.o� L 0.0 �. p,p 0 �► 0.84 ' t 0 0.0 y '�..::r..-� • 0.0 '.� , 0 .� 0 r 0 i 0 -.-�;�:� 0.0 �0.0 7 = ,� 0.0 �► 0.0 7 - - . ,��..� h *� f' '1 ♦ P = ��:��2r.: 0 1D3 � �D.D 3.9 0.0� � ♦ � � ,"�:c:r"s ::_- -:ia.-,-,.`. ,rex.i�s� 1Z9 9 7t 103 . = ..__--- [ SW 703rd ) �-�- ^ , �' y �, [ SW 1D3rd J . :.,��_��€��.�� .�1 I_._._ � ' � �� .��.�F�'�. ��+ � �,,..r�...� d.. r ��_ � �«? .� i 4 ! � o �^,, � + � � 1 � 4 '� f P � 2 � IVORTH � � �� I� �J a � 4�O`y O � y �� „ O � �� 'SEE LEGEt�SNEET 5-MIN COUNT SW 103rd SW 103rd Church Drvuy 3 Church Drv✓y 3 PERIOD (Northbound (Souttsboun (Eastbound {Westbound TOTAL HOURLY BEGINNING A7 Left Thru Right U Left Thru Rlght U Left Thru Righi U Left Thru Ri ht U TOTALS 7:00 AM 0 12 D 0 4 0 0 0 D 0 0 0 16 7:95 AAA 0 27 U 0 6 0 0 0 0 0 0 - 0 33 7:30 AM 0 28 0 0 6 0 D 0 0 0 0 0 34 7:45 AA9 0 31 D 0 9 9 0 0 0 0 0 0 40 23 B:00 AM 0 17 0 0 10 0 0 0 D Q 0 0 27 134 8:'15 AM 0 13 0 0 3 0 0 0 1 0 D 0 17 118 8:30 AM 0 16 0 0 7 0 0 Q D 0 0 0 23 107 6:45 AM D 12 0 0 9 0 0 0 D 0 0 0 21 88 PEAK 15-MIN Na►thbound Southbourtd Eastbound Wesibound FLOW RATES LeR Thru Right U LeR Thru Right U Lek Thru Right U Lett Thru Right U �aTAL AEI Vehicles o 124 0 � 36 o D 0 D 0 0 0 160 Heavy Trucks D a o 0 a 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 8 Pedestrians D o 0 0 0 Bicyctes Railroad Stopped Suses Counter Commenfs Rapwi generated on 7lZBt2006 SOURCE:Quality CouMS.LLC(http:!(www.qualitycouMS.net) Type of peak hour being reported:IntarsecUm Peak Melhad►or determining peak hour.Tdal Enlering Vdume INTERSECTION: SW 103rd—Church Drvry 3 QC JOB#: 10182708 WEATHER: DATE: 7/2512D06 a * Peak-Hour: 5:00 PM—6:00 PM ; * � 8 0 0 � �6.D 0.0 0.0� .► i b J i �. io �. o � � o �. o � Church Drvvy 3 ] o.o ♦o.o� t o.o ♦ o.o o � 0.83 ; « o o.o.. �' « o.o o .� o � � o •► o o.o �o.o� r a.o � o.o �► t e' �,;;: ?:;;�. '� f P 2 0 0 �o.o o.o o.o � z:� �� + * y a,..v"�Y'� -s'q ♦ * .�.. � 2 w:�:::Y�`..�i{�x� 0.� 0.� ..•, � sw i os�a � [ SW9�03rd 1 ��,� . .�.�.��I,� .,� � � �_ _�� - � , t 2 � =: ° � O i , �-► 4 � . � � o � NORTH � � J� � � � � ♦ � � ... �v9,`�`�,� � �� « 4�oy.�o90 --L H � �� w' w � � � � 'SEE LECtEND SHEET 5-AAIN COLINT SW 103rd SW 703rd Church Drwy 3 Church Drwy 3 HOURLY PERIOD Northbounrl Southboun East6ound estboun TOTAL TOTALS BEGINNING AT Left Thru Ri ht U Left Thrv RI ht U Leit Thru Ri ht U l.eft Thru R M U 2:00 PM 1 0 0 0 0 1 i 0 7 0 0 0 4 2:15PM 1 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 1 0 0 0 3 2:30 PM 0 0 D 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 2:45 PM 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 D 0 1 9 3:OD PM 1 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 2 7 3:15PM 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 4 3:30 PM 2 0 0 0 0 0 Q D 0 0 0 0 2 5 3:45 PM 1 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 2 0 0 0 4 8 4:U0 PM Q 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 fi 4:�5 PM 2 0 0 0 D 1 0 D 0 0 0 0 3 9 4:30PM 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 8 4:45 PM 0 0 0 D 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 5 5:00 PM 0 0 0 0 U 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 6 5:15PM 0 0 0 0 0 2 0 0 0 0 0 0 2 5 s: � o 0 0 0 o a 5:45 PM 1 0 0 0 0 2 0 0 0 0 0 0 3 40 PFJ►K 15-MIN Northbound Southbound Eastbound Westbound FLOW RATES Left Thru Right U Leit Thru Right U Leit Thru RighS U Lefl 7hru Right U TOTAL All Vehicles 4 0 0 0 D 12 0 U 0 0 0 0 16 Heavy Trucks 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 U o 0 0 Pedestrians o 0 a o 0 Bicycles Railroad 5iopped Buses Counter Commenls: Report generaled on 728l2D06 SOURCE:�ualiry Counts.LLC(hltpJAvww.qualirycounis.net) Existing Weelcday Peak Hour and Mid-afternoon Peak Hour Traffi� Volumes MITIG8 - am Mon Jul 31, 2006 18:31:57 Page 1-1 Existing 2006 weekday Peak Hour Traffic Volumes {AMy Tigard MITCA School Level Of Service Computation Report 20Q0 HCM Unsignalized Method (Future Volume Alternative} *�+*�******�***+******�+******�***************�*********************�********�� Intezsection #5 SW 103rd Ave & SW Canterbury Ln ********************.*.*****:�******�**�*�.*�•�*��**w�+********�****�********** Average Delay (seclveh) : 6.4 Worst Case Level Of Service: A[ 9.6] **�*********+�****+******+***�**********+***�***�**�***�********��***�***��.�* Street Name: Sw 103rd Ave SW Canterbury Ln Approaeh: North Bound South Bound East Bound West Bound Movement: L - T - R L - T - R L - T - R L - T - R ------------�---------------� �-----------------ll---------------� �---------------� Control: Uncontrolled Uncontrolled Stop Sign Stop Sign Rights: Include Include Include Include Lanes: 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 Q 0 1! � D 0 d 0 0 0 ----- --�---------------� �`--------------� �---------------� �---------------� Volume Module: » Count Date: 25 Jul 2006 « AM Peak Hour Base vol: 16 i9 0 0 9 aa 90 a 4o a o 0 Growth Adj: 1.00 1.�0 1.OQ 1.00 1.00 1.00 Z.00 1.00 1.06 1.00 1.00 1.00 Initial Sse: 16 19 0 0 9 22 90 0 4Q 0 0 0 Added Vol: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 PasserByVol: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Initial Fut: 16 19 0 0 9 22 90 0 40 D 0 0 User Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 Z.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 I.00 1.00 PHF Adj: 0.83 0.83 0.83 0.83 0.83 0.83 0.83 0.83 0.83 0.83 0.83 0.83 PHF Volume: 19 23 0 0 11 27 108 0 46 0 Q 0 Reduct Vol: 0 0 0 0 0 0 D 0 0 0 0 0 Final Vol. : 19 23 0 0 11 27 108 0 46 0 D 0 Critical Gap Module: Critical Gp: 4.2 xxxx xxxxsc xxxxx �x xxxxx 6.4 xx�oc b.2 xxx�oc xxxx xxxxx Fo1lowUpTim: 2.3 x�ooc �cxxx xxx�cx xxxx aocxx�c 3.5 xac�cx 3.3 xxxxx xxxx x�xx --- --�---------------� f---------------� �---------------� (---------------� Capacity Module: Cnflict Vol: 37 xxxx xxacxx xxxx xx�ac xxxxx 86 xxxx 24 xxxx xxxx x�ocxx Potent Cap. : 1548 xxxx xxxxx xxxx �ocx xxxxx 916 xxxx 1052 xxxx x�cx xxxxx Move Cap. : 1548 xxxx xxxxx xxxx x�c�cx x�ocxx 9�7 xx� 1052 xxxx �cx xxxxx VolumelCap: 0.dl xxxx xxx�c x�caoc �acx xxxx 0.12 xxxx 0.05 xxxx �cxx xxxx ---------___�__ � �--------------� �---------------� �---------------� Level Of Service Module: 2Way95thQ: 0.0 �x xx�nc xxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxx �x xxxxx xxxx �ocx 3ooc�oc ControZ Del: 7.4 xxxx xx�ooc xxxxx xxxx xxxxx 3cxxxx xxxx xacx�cx xxxxx xxxx xxxxx LOS by MoVe: A * * * * * + * * * * * Movement: LT - LTR - RT LT - LTR - RT LT - LTR - RT LT - LT12 - RT Shared Cap. : xx� xxxx xxxxx �x xxxx x�x xxxx 947 xxx�c xxxx xxxx xx�cx SharedQueue: 0.0 xxxac x�cxx ��x x�x xxxxx xxxxx 0.b �c�cx� xxxxx xxxx xxxx�c Shrd ConDel: 7.4 �ocxx xxxxx xxx�c xxicx xxxxac x�xx 9.6 xxxxx xxxxx xxxx x�cxxx Shared LOS: A * * * * * * A * '` * * ApproachDel: xxx�cxx xxxxxx 9.6 x�c�cxxx ApproachLOS: * * A * ***�***��****«*�t��«,r*�*+r,:*r�*****�***:r,.x�*�*�*********<x***�x�x�********,r*,t�*�**** Note: Queue reported is the number of cars per lane. Traf€ix 7.8.0515 (c) 2006 Dowling Assoc. Licensed to CT5 ENGINEERS, INC. MITIGB - pm Man Jul 31, 2006 19:00:26 Page 1-1 -------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Existing 20�6 Weekday Peak Hour Traffic Volumes (FM} Tigard MITCH School Level Of Service Computation Report 2000 HCM Unsignalized Method (Future Volume Alternative) �*t**�*.**,r*+***+�*f****+�.*,r.r,.,r**.+#�***��*.*�*,�,�•..*.#**#.+**.�**..•**�*.+�,rt Intersection #5 SW 103rd Ave � SW Canterbury Ln ,r*r**�,r****r*x*****•,r**,r•+r+r*+**��rr*a*r*,t+�.*.****++t�e**r+*+*•+.*t**+*.**,r*,r**r* Average Delay (sec/veh) : 3.9 Worst Case Level Of Service: BE 10.5] *t:.�+•++*,r**+��*.+*****:*xw*+�****«..x***,r*:r*►#*•�r�.t+rtxtx,r,►aa#,r***•+�**r**.*,rr Street Name: SW 1Q3rd Ave SW Canterbury Ln Approach: North Sound South Bound East Bound West Bound Movement: L - T - R L - T - R L - T - R L - T - R ------------I---------------� �---------------� I---------------� �---------------I Control: Uncontrolled Uncontrolled Stop Sign Stop Sign Rights: Tnclude Include Include Include Lanes: 0 1 0 Q 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 1! 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 ------------�----------------i �---------------� �----------------� �---------------� Volume Module: Base Vol: 75 18 0 0 40 130 35 8 30 0 0 Q Growth Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 2.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Initial Bse: 75 18 0 0 40 130 35 0 30 0 d 0 Added vol: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 PasserByVol: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Initial Fut: 75 18 0 0 46 130 35 0 30 0 0 0 User Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.Q0 1.00 1.00 1.00 PHF Adj: 0.83 0.83 0.83 0.83 0.83 0.83 0.83 0.83 0.83 0.83 0.83 0.83 PHF Volume: 90 22 0 0 48 157 42 0 36 0 0 0 Reduct Vol: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 a 0 6 0 Fina2 Vol. : 90 22 0 D 48 157 42 0 36 0 0 0 Critical Gap Module: Critical Gp: 4.1 x�s.xx �ocaocx xx�ooc xxxx �ocxxx 6.4 �ocxx 6.2 xxxxx �ocxx xxxxx Fo1lowUpTim: 2.2 xxxx �ooc�oc xxxxx xxxx �oocxx 3.5 xxxx 3.3 x'xxxx xxxx xx�ucx ------------�----------------� �---------------� �---------------� �---------------� Capacity Module: Cn f l i c t Vo 2: 2 0 5 xxxx xxx�t �oacx �xx xxxxx 3 2 9 xxxx 12 7 xx�oc xxxx xxxxx Potent Cap. : 1367 x�oc�c xxxxx xxxx xxxx �ocx�oc 666 xxxx 924 x�onc �cxx xxxxx Move Cap. : 1367 xxxx xxxxx x�ocx xxxx xxxxx 630 xxxx 924 xx�oc �cxx x�cxxx Valume/Cap: 0.07 xxxx xxxx x�ooc xxxx xxxx 0.07 xxxx 0.04 x�ooc xxxx xxxx ------------�---------------� �---------------� �---------------� �---------------� Level Of Service Module: 2Way95th4= �•z X�ocx xxxxX xxxX xxxx �000cx xxxx xxxx xxxxx x�x xx�cx xxx�oc Control Del: 7.8 xxxx xxxxx �ocxxx xx�cx xx�ocx xxxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxxx �ocx x�cxxx LOS by MOVe: A * � * * * * * * * � * Movement: LT - LTR - RT LT - LT22 - RT LT - LTR - RT LT - LTR - RT Shared Cap. : xxxx xxxx �cxx xxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxx 738 xxx�cx xxxx x�ocx x�c�cx SharedQueue: 0_2 �ocxx xxxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxxx 0.4 xxxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxxx Shrd ConDel: 7.8 xxxx xxxxx x�cxxx xxxx x�oocx xxxxx 10_5 xx3ocx �ocx�c�c xxxx xxxxx Shared LOS: A '� * * "` * * B � * * * ApproachDel: xx�ocxx xxxxx�c 10.5 xxxxxx ApproachLOS: * '' B ` ir#+#fitit�t**+t#+i.4tr,l�Firt****�F,r*tritR.t#*****tvtt,k#*t,F#t4,t,t**tf�t#.l�k.t***litfirrtr,txitiFicfit,l,F*# Note: Queue reported is the number of cars per lane. Traffix 7.8.0515 (c) 2006 Dowling Assoc. Licensed to CTS ENGINEERS, INC. MITIG8 - Mid-PM School PeakMon Jul 31, 2D06 18:56:09 Page 1-1 Existing 2006 weekday MId-afternoon School Peak Hour Traffic Volumes Tigard MITCH School ----------------------------------------------------------------------------- Level Of Sezvice Computation Report 2000 HCM Unsignalized Method (Future Volwne Alternative? ��***********************�*��**��*+*�«�*�*.�*******.��*******�****�*******�*�*�* Intersection #5 SW 103rd Ave & SW Canterbury Ln ******��:��**�*�********�+**�*****�*******+*****«*�+****�***�*******�*�*��****** Average Delay (sec/veh) : 5.2 Worst Case Level Of Service: A[ 9.3] :****�**�********�**+*****�***�**�*****�:*.�*******#x*��*****�*******�*********� Street Name: SW 103rd Ave SW Canterbury Ln Approach: North Bound South Bound East Bound West Bound Movement: L -- T - R L - T - R L - T - R L - T - R -----------�---------------I �--------------( �---------------� �--------------� Control: Uncantrolled Uncantrolled Stop Sign Stop Sign Rights: Znclude Inc2ude Include Include Lanes: 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 1! 0 0 0 Q 0 0 0 ------------�---------------t �---------------� �---------------� �---------------� Volume Module: » Count Date: 25 Jul 2006 « Mid-afternoon peak Base VoI: 23 14 0 0 11 40 50 0 19 0 0 0 Growth Adj : 1.00 1.00 1.00 i.OQ 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.OQ 1.00 1.00 Initial Bse: 23 I4 0 Q 12 40 50 d 19 6 0 0 Added vol: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 6 Q 0 0 PasserByVol: Q 0 6 Q 0 0 0 0 b 0 D 0 Initial Fut: 23 I4 0 0 11 40 50 0 19 0 0 0 User Aa�: i.aa 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.b0 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 PHF Adj : Q.83 0.83 0.83 0.83 0.83 0.83 0.83 0.83 0.83 0.83 0.83 0.83 PHF Volume: 28 17 0 0 13 48 60 0 23 0 0 0 Reduct Vol: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 4 0 0 0 0 Final Vol. : 28 Z7 0 0 13 48 60 0 23 Q 0 0 Critical Gap Module: Critical Gp: 4.2 xxxx xxxxx x�oocx xxxx xxx.�oc 6.4 �ocxx 6.2 xxxxx �000c xxxxx Fo1lowUpTim: 2.3 �xx xxxxx xxxxx �x xx� 3.5 �oc�cx 3.3 �cxxx �ooc �cxxx ----------�---------------C �---------------� �--------------� {--------------� Capacity Module: Cnflict Vol: 61 �x x�xx xxxx xxxx x�c�ocx 110 �oc�cx 37 xx�cx xxx�c xxxxx Potent Cap. : 1516 xxxx xxxxx x7ocx xxxx xxx�oc 8B7 �oc� 1035 xxxx x�ooc xx�cxx Move Cap. : 1516 �x xxxxx �ocx xxxx �xxx 875 �ocxx 1035 xxxx �ocxx �cx� Volume/Cap: 0.02 �oc� xxxx x�ooc x� xx�cx 0.07 xxxx 0.02 xxx�c xxxx xxxx ------------�--------------� �----------------� �---------------� �-----------___-� Level Of Service Module: 2Way95thQ: 0.1 x�ca�c xxxacx xxxx xxxx xxx�c xxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxx �x xxxxx Control Del: 7.4 �xx xxxxx xx�ocx xxxx 3ocxxx xxxxx �oocx xx�cxx xxxxx aacxx xxxxx LOS by MOVe: A * * * * * * * * * * * Movement: LT - LTR - RT LT - L'I'R - RT LT - LTR - RT LT - LTR - RT Shared Cap. : �cac� xxxx xx�ocx xxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxx 914 xxxxx xxxx �ocxx xx�aoc SharedQueue: 0.1 xxxx xxxaoc x�x x3cxx �x�oc xxxxx 0.3 xxxxx xxxxx �ac�oc �cxxx Shrd ConDel: 7.4 �oocx xxxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxxx aoc�cx 9.3 xx�c�cx xx3cxx �oocx xxxxx Shared LOS: A * � * �` * " A * � * * ApproachDel: xxxx�c xxx�t 9_3 �ocxxxx AppraachL05: * * A * **x**:r*+************,r****�r****�*****,r******��*******�**��,r,r,r**,�t+,r*******�**��* Note: Queue reported i.s the number of cars per lane. Traffix 7.8.0515 Sc) 2006 Dowling Assoc. Licensecl to CTS ENGIIdEERS, INC. MITIG8 - am Mon Jul 31, 2006 18:33:57 Page 1-1 -------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Existing 2006 Weekday Peak Hour Traffic Volumes (AM) Tigard MITCH School Leve1 Of Service Computation Report 2000 HCM Unsignalized Method (Future Volume Alternative) #x*****+***+.*�*..**:**.******************+****.**...#.#.*:�*..:****�.**##.****+ Intersection #4 SW 103rd Ave & SW Inez St +*++�+.****#**��.#***•#*�*#.***t�*..:***�.*�***.w*****�x**�*+.**+*.•***��***�.x* Average Delay tsec/veh} ; �.4 Worst Case Level Of Service: A[ 9.7I **t****.a#***�**.r**.*.***rw*+*t****t**r*t*�**«.***��**��:**..**t+**a***r.****** Street Name: SW 103rd Ave SW Inez St Apgroach: North Bound South Bound East Bound West Bound Movement: L - T - R L - T - R L - T - R L - T - R ------------�---------------� �----------------� �---------------� �---------------� Control: Uncontrolled Uncontrolled Stop Sign Stop Sign Rights: Include Include Include Include Lanes: 0 0 0 1 0 0 1 0 Q 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1! 0 0 ------------�---------------� �---------------� �---------------� '---------------� Volurne Module: » Count Date: 25 Jul 2006 « Mid-PM Base Vol: b 100 4 2 30 0 0 0 0 2 0 2 Growth Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.d0 1.00 1.00 1.Q0 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.Od 1.00 1.00 Initial Bse: 0 100 4 2 30 0 d 0 0 2 D 2 Added Vol: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 PasserByVol: 0 0 0 0 0 0 Q 0 0 4 0 0 Initial Fut: 0 100 4 2 30 0 0 0 0 2 0 2 User Adj: 1.00 1.60 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.Q0 1.00 PHF Adj: 0.87 O.B7 0.87 0.87 0.87 0.67 0.87 0.87 0.87 0.87 0.87 0.87 PHF Volume: 0 1Z5 5 2 34 0 0 0 0 2 0 2 Reduct Vol: D 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Final Vol. : 0 115 5 2 34 0 0 0 0 2 0 2 Critical Gap Modu2e: Critical Gp:x�ocaoc xxxx xx�ocx 4.2 xxxx xxxxx xxx�os xxxx xxxxx 6.9 xxxx 6.7 Fo1lowUpTim:x�acxx x�ocx x�oocx 2.3 xxxx x�x xxxxx xxxx �oQCxx 4.0 xx�oc 3.8 ------------�---------------� �---------------� �----------------� �---------------� Capacity Module: Cnf 1 ic t Vo 1: xxxx xxxx �0000t 12 0 xxxx xxxxx �ocxx xx�oc xxxxx 15 b �x 117 Potent Cap. : �cxx xxxx �000cx 14d3 xxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxx �ocxxx 735 xx�cx 820 Move Cap. : xxxx xxxx �ocxxx 1403 xxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxx xxxxx 734 xxxx 820 vo l ume/C ap: xxxx x�cx acxxx 0.0 0 x�ooc xxxx xxxx xxxx xxxx 0.0 0 xxxx 0.0 0 ------------�---------------� �---------------� �---------------� �----- � Level Of Service Module: 2Way95thQ: xxxx xxxx xxxx�c 0.0 xxxx xxxxx xxxx �ocxx xx�ooc �oocx xxxx xxxxx Control Del:xxxxx xxxx xxxxx 7.6 xx�oc xxxxx xxxxx xacxx ac�oocx �ocxxx xx�oc xxx�c LOS by MOV2: * * * A * ' " " ' " * '` Movement: LT - LTR - RT LT - LTR - RT LT - LTR - RT LT - LTR - RT 8hared Cap_ : y000c xxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxx �ocxxx xx�oc xxxx �oocxx x5cxx 775 xxxxx SharedQueue:xxxxx x�ocx x�000c 0.0 �cxxx xxx3cx xxxxx xxxx xxxxx x�cxxx 0.0 x�x Shrd ConDel:xxx� xxxx xxxxx 7.6 xxxx xacxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxxx 9.7 �ocxxx Shared LOS: * � ' P. * ' * * # * A * ApproachDel: xxxxxx xxxxxx xxxxxx 9.7 ApproachLOS: * * * A t+r+,r�,r+►*,t**+r,e*****#**,r**�,r**,t*,t�t::rt:r.«*,r**x�e�r,t*x*,t:,tw+*,rw«.r.x*+r+r.+.�,r*...,t. Note: Queue reported is the number of cars per lane. Traffix 7.8.0515 {c) 2006 Dowling Assoc. Licensed to CTS ENGINEERS, INC. MITIG8 - pm Mon Jul 31, 2006 1$:33:35 Page 1-1 -------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Existing 20Q6 Weekday Peak Hour Traffic Volumes fPM) Tigard MITCH School -------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Level Of Service Computation Report 2000 HCM Unsignalized Method (Future Volume Alternative) *.:t.******..**�.##*k*.#*.*.��..w+��*****�****«**+�+.�.***�*«,r*t**..***x**�**«*+** Intersection #4 SW 103rd Ave & SW Inez St *,►**•.**�.+.t..**+***+�.*.***,r***«*.*.*�*,rkk***.#*+***.****�.�,r�********.****W** Average Delay (sec/veh) : 0.2 Wozst Case Level Of Service: A[ 9.2] I�**Yf**********�#f�i#f4i***!t*�k*�t**f4#**�lfr****#****f***tt�k*i!!*#�t*****R******+k*#**** Street Name: SW lfl3rd Ave SW Inez St Approach: North Bound South Bound East Bound West Bound Movement: L - T - R L - T - R L - T - R L - T - R ------------�---------------� I----------------� �---------------I �----------------� Control: i3ncontrolled Uncontrolled Stop Sign Stop Sign Rights: Include Include Include Include Lanes: 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 Q 0 d 0 1! 0 0 ------------�---------------� �---------------� �---------------� �---------------� Volume ModuZe: Base Vol: 0 40 4 0 160 6 0 0 0 2 0 2 Growth Adj: 1.04 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.OQ 1.00 1.OQ 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Initial Bse: 0 40 4 0 160 a 0 0 0 2 0 2 Added Vol: 0 0 0 0 0 � 0 0 0 0 0 0 PasserByVol: 0 0 0 0 0 Q 0 0 0 0 D 0 Initial Fut: 0 40 4 0 160 0 0 0 0 2 0 2 User Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 PHF Adj: 0.85 0.85 0.85 O.BS 6.85 0.85 0.85 0.85 0.85 0.85 D.85 0.85 PHF Volume: 6 47 5 0 186 Q 0 0 0 2 0 2 Reduct Vol: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Final Vol. : 0 47 5 0 186 D 0 0 0 2 0 2 Critical Gap Module: Critical Gp:xxxxx �ocxx xxxxx xx�ooc xx�nc xxxxx �ocxx�c xxxx xxxxx 6.4 �oc�oc 6.2 Fo1lowUpTim:xxxxx �ocxx x�ocxx xxx�oz xxxx xxxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxxx 3.5 �ocxx 3.3 ------------�---------------� �---------------� �---------------� �---------------� Capacity Module: Cnflict Vol: xxxx xacxx xxxxx � xxxx x�ocxx xxxx xxxx xxxxx 238 ��oc 49 Potent Cap.: xxxx �ocxx �ocxxx x�ocx x�ocx xxxxx xxxx xxxx xxxxx 751 �oixx 1019 Move Cap. : x�c�cx xxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxx xxxxx x�x xxxx �acxxx 7 51 xxxx 1014 Volume/Cap: xxxx xxxx xxxx x�noc �oc�tx �ocxx xxxx xxxx xxxx 0.00 �xx O.Oa ------------�---------------� �----------------� �---------------� (---------------� Level Of Service Module: 2Way95thQ: xxxx xxxx x�cx�cx �oocx �c�c xxx�oc x�ocx xxxx x�x x�ocx xxxx xxxxx Control Del:xxxxx xxxx xx� �ncxxx x�ocx xxxxx xxx�oc xxxx xxx�cx xxx�oc xxxx �ocxxx LOS by MOV2: * '� * * * * " * * * # * Movement: LT - LTR - RT LT - LTR - RT LT - LTR - RT LT - LTR - RT Shared Cap. : xxxx xxxx xxx�oc xxxx xxxx xx�cxx xxxx xx�cx xxx�oc xxxx B64 x�ocxx SharedQueue:xxxxx �ocxx �acxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxxx �ocx xxxxx �oc�cxx 0.0 xacxxx Shrd ConDel:�ocxxx xxxx xx�ocx xxxxx xxxx xxxxx xxx�ac x�cxx xxx�oc xxxxx 9.2 �000cx Shared LOS: * * * * * * * * * * A * ApproachDel: �ncxxx xxxxxx xxxxxx 9•2 ApproachLOS: * '' * A *�*�****,t,t,t.t*�,t***,tww**.**x,r,t,t,t,t*,+«+t*.s**+r+r+++rr**a�**x*�*�**��+r*��+,r+*#.*.*** Note: Queue reported is the number of cars per lane. Traffix 7.8.0515 (c} 2006 Dowling Assoc. Licensed to CTS ENGINEERS, INC. MITIG$ - Mid-PM School PeakMon Jul 31, 2006 18:52:01 Page 1-1 -------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Existing 2006 Weekday MId-afternoon School Peak Hour Traffic Volumes Tigard MITCH SChool -------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Level Of Service Computation Report 2000 HCM Unsignalized Method (Future Volume Alternative} �**�*.*��*:#***.*.�..t.*�**+*****�*«�****.+****�*+**•k***�***+��*****�*.�***+�� Intersection #4 SW 103rd Ave & SW Inez St *�.�at+.*�«�x#��+x*#*****«***+**.�W**x*#********.�*�.x****a**r****r**t�*�**x*�r Average Delay (sec/veh) : 1.4 Worst Case Level Of Service: A[ 9.51 *****.+*�******�**«*�.�**+*****�*.******�.****:.**********.�.«*k******r..*.�+�** Street Name: SW 103rd Ave SW Inez Bt Approach: North Bound South Bound East Bound West Bound Movement: L - T - R L - T - R L - T - R L - T - R ------------�---------------� �---------------� �----___--------� �---------------� Control: Uncontrolled Uncontrolled Stop Sign Stop Sign Rights: Include Include Include Include Lanes: 0 0 0 1 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1! 0 0 ------------�---------------� f---------------� �---------------� �--------------� Volume Module: » Count Date: 25 Jul 200b « Mid-PM Base Vol: 0 45 8 8 55 0 0 0 0 6 0 7 Growth Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.QQ 1.00 1.00 InitiaZ Bse: 0 45 S 8 55 0 0 0 0 6 0 7 Added Vol: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 � 0 PasserByVol: 0 0 Q 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Initial Fut: 0 45 8 S 55 0 0 0 0 6 0 7 User Adj: 2.00 1.00 1.0a 1.00 1.00 2.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.Q0 1.00 1.00 PHF Adj: 0.87 0.87 0.87 0.87 0.87 0.87 0.87 0.87 0.87 0.87 0.87 O.B7 PHF Volume: 0 52 9 9 63 0 0 0 0 7 0 8 Reduct Vol: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Final Vol. : 0 52 9 9 63 0 0 a 0 7 0 8 Critical Gap Module: Cr i t i ca 1 Gp:x�cxxx xx�cx xxxxx 4.2 xxxx �c�c�noc x�c�cx xxxx xxxxx 6.9 xxxx 6.7 FollowUpTim:xxxxx xxxx xxxxx 2.3 xxxx x�ocxx �ocxxx xxxx xxxxx 4.0 xxxx 3.8 ------------�---------------� �---------------� �---------------� �---------------� Capacity Module: Cnflict Vol: xxxx xxx�c x�txx 61 xxxx x�x xxxx xxxx xxxxx 138 xxxx 56 Potent Cap. : �ocxx x�acx xxxxx 1475 xxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxx xxxxx 754 xa�x 890 Move Cap. : aocxx xxxx xxxxx 1475 xxxx xxxxx x�oc xxxx x�txxx 750 xxxx 890 Voiume/Cap: xxxx xxxx x�ocx Q.O1 xxxx xxxx xxxx xxxx xxxx 0.01 xxxx 0_O1 ------------�---------------� �---------------� t---------------� �-__------------� Level Of Service Module: 2Way95thQ: xxxx �ocxx �oacxx D.0 xxxx xxxx�c xxxx xxxx xx�ocx xxxx xxxx xxxxx Control Del:xxxxx xxxx �ocxxx 7.5 �txxx xxxxx xxx�oc xxxx xxxxx x�ocxx xxxx xxxxx LOS by Move: * * * A * * * ' * * * ` Movement: LT - LTR - RT LT - LTR - RT LT - LTR - RT LT - LTR - RT Shared Cap. : xx�oc xx�cx �ocxxx xaocx xxxx �ocx�c xxxx x�oot xxxaoc xxxx 820 xxxxx SharedQueue:xxxxx xxxx xxxxx 0.0 xxxx xxxxx x�cxac xxxx xxxxx xxxxx D.1 xxxxx Shrd ConDel:xxxxx xxxx xxxxx 7.5 xxxx xxxxx x�oacx xxxx xx�ocx xxxxx 9.5 xxxxx Shared LOS: * * * A " * '� * * * A * ApproachDel: xxxx�c�c xxx�cxx xxxxxx 9_5 ApproachLOS: * * '` �'' �**�*��**r«*,r***�***+,r*�r�***•*.*+***�*****,,,.*,r.*.*�***,rf.***�,r***•.,r*+.**+***+�� Note: Queue reported is the number of cars per lane. Traffix 7.8.0515 (c) 2006 Dowling Assoc. Licensed to CTS ENGINEERS, INC. Future Bacicground 2�08 Weeicday 1�eak Hour and Mid-afternoon Pea1c Hour Traffic Volumes MITIG8 - am Mon 3u1 31, 200b 18:59:49 Page 1-1 ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ Future Background 2008 Weekday Peak Hour Traffic Volumes (AM? Tigard MITCH School -------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Level Of Service Computation Report 2000 HCM Unsignalized Method (Future Volume Alternative) *�**********#**��*t�*****�***�*******�********t*********+**�**********+*�***�*** Intersection #5 SW 103rd Ave & SW Canterbury Ln ******�#�********�*�*w**�*****�******�***********�***�*«*:�****�***+�#:********* Average Delay (sec/veh? : 7.6 Worst Case Level Of Service: A[ 9.6J �******+***:�******x***�.****:�***************��**x***+aw***********++****�**** Street Name: SW 203rd Ave SW Canterbury Ln Approach: North Bound South Bound East Bound West Bound Movement: L - T - R L - T - R L - T - R L - T - R ------------�---------------I �---------------� f---------------I �-__------------� Control: Uncontrolled Uncontrolled Stop Sign Stop Sign Rights: Include Include Include Include Lanes: d 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 1! 0 0 4 0 0 0 0 ------------�---------------, �---------------� �---------------lF---------------� Volume Module: » Count Date: 25 Jul 2006 « ,AM Peak Hour Base Vol: 16 19 0 0 4 22 90 0 40 0 d 0 Growth Adj: 1.05 1.�5 1.05 1.65 1.05 1.05 1.Q5 1.05 1.05 1.05 1.05 1.05 Initial Bse: 17 20 0 0 9 23 94 0 42 0 0 0 Added Vol: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 PasserByVol: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 � 0 0 Initial Fut: 17 20 0 0 9 23 94 0 42 0 Q Q User Adj: 1.Q6 1.Oa 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.D0 1.a0 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 PHF Adj : 0.83 0.83 0.83 0.83 0.83 0.83 0.83 0.83 0.83 0_83 0.83 0.83 PHF Volume: 24 24 � 0 11 28 lI4 6 51 0 0 0 Reduct Vol: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Fina1 Vol_ : 20 24 0 0 11 28 114 0 51 0 Q 0 Critical Gap Module: Critical Gp: 4.2 xxxx �ocx�ot xxxxx xx�oc xxxxx 6.4 xxxx b.2 xxxxx xxxx xx�x FollowUp'I'im: 2.3 xxxx xxx�oc xxxx�c xx�nc xxxxx 3.5 �cxxx 3.3 aaoocx xxxx aoc� ------------�---------------� �--------------� �---------------� �---------------� Capacity Module: Cnflict Vol: 39 �cxx aocxxx xxxx xx� xxx�c 90 xxxx 25 xxxx xxxx xxxxx Potent Cap. : 1545 xxxx �xxx x�cxx xx�cx xxx�t 911 xxxx 1051 xxxx xxxx xxxxx Move Cap. : 1545 �txx xxx�oc xxxx xxxx �cxx 901 x� 1051 xx� �cx �cxxx Volume/Cap: 0.01 �ocxx xxxx xxxx xx�cx xx�oc 0.13 xxxx 0.05 xxxx aoocx xx3cx -----------�---------------� �--------------� �---------------� �---------------� Level Of Service Module: 2Way95thQ: 0.0 7cxxx ��osx xxxx xaooc xxxxx xx�oc xxacx xxxxx xxxx xxxx xxxxx Control Del: 7.4 xxxx xxx�oc xxxxx xxxx xxxxx xx�ooc xxxx xxxxx xxxxx aacxx xxxxx LOS by MOV2: A * * * '� * * * * * * * Movement: LT - LTR - RT LT - LTft - RT LT - LTR - RT LT - LTR - RT Shared Cap. : xxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxx xxaos x�oocx 3cxxx 943 3oQacx x�acx xxxx xxx�c SharedQueue: 0.0 xxxx xxxxx xxxxx xx�oc xxxxx xx�oac 0.6 xxxxat xx�ocx xxxx xxxxx Shrd ConDel: 7.4 x�x xxx�oc xx�cx �ocx x�oocx xxx�oc 9.6 xxx�cx xxxx�c x�cx xxxxx $harecl L4S: A * * * * * * A * * * * ApproachDel: xxxxxx x�ootxx 9.6 xxxxxx ApproachL05: * * A * ***«****************�***********�,��*��******************�*x*****�***��******* Note: Queue reported is the number of cars per lane. Traffix 7.8.0515 (c) 2006 Dowling Assoc. Licensed to CTS ENGINEERS, II�FC. MITIG8 - pm Mon Jul 31, 2006 18:59:24 Page 1-1 --------------------------------------------------------------------------- Future Background Weekday Peak Hour Traffic Volumes (PM) Tigard MITCH School -------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Level Of Service Computation Report 2000 HCM Unsignalized Method (Future Volume Alternative} ****r**�****��************+***:**�***«#*t��**+*.****:*:******+�*******+�***��*+. Intersection #5 SW iO3rd Ave & SW Canterbury Ln ��*�**�****+************�********�*******#�***********�***�*��**#**:�+******�*+ Average Delay {sec/veh) : 3.9 Worst Case Level Of Service: B[ 10.6] *****.*�*****�****��*************+*****�*****��***��****t�***********.*.�***** Street Name: SW 1Q3rd Ave SW Canterbury Ln Approach: North Bound South Bound East Bound West Bound Movement: L - T - R L - T - R L - T - R L - T - R -----------�---------------� �---------------� �--------------� �---------------� Control: Uncontrolled Uncontrolled Stop Sign Stop Sign Rights: Include Include Include Include Lane s: 0 1 0 0 0 0 D 0 1 0 0 0 1! 0 0 0 0 0 0 D ------------�---------------� �---------------� �---------------� �---------------� Vo2ume Madule: Base Vol: 75 18 0 0 40 130 35 � 36 0 0 0 Growth Adj: 1.05 1.05 2.05 1.05 1.05 1.05 1.05 1.05 1.05 1.05 1.05 1.05 Initial Bse: 79 19 0 0 42 137 37 6 32 0 0 0 Added Vol: 0 0 0 0 0 o a o a a o 0 PasserByVoi: 0 0 0 d 0 0 Q 0 0 0 Q 0 Initial Fut: 79 19 0 � 42 137 37 0 32 0 4 0 User Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 PHF Adj: 0.83 0.63 0.83 0.83 0.83 0.83 0.83 0.83 0.83 0.83 0.83 0.83 PI�' Volume: 95 23 0 0 51 164 44 4 38 0 6 0 Reduct Vol: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Final Vo1. : 95 23 0 0 51 164 44 0 38 0 0 0 Critical Gap Module: Cr i t i c a 1 Gp: 4.1 �cxx xxx�ac �cxxx x3ocx xxxxx 6.4 xxxx 6.2 x�ocxx xaocx xxxxx FollowUpTim: 2.2 xxxx xxxxx xxx�cx xx�oc xx�cx 3.5 xxxx 3.3 xxxxx xxxx xxxxx ------------�---------------� �------------� l---------------{ �---------------� Capacity Module: Cnflict Vol: 215 xxx�c xxxxx xxxx xxxx xxxxx 345 x�oc 133 xxxx x3ocx xxxxx Potent Cap. : 1355 xx7oc xxxxx xxxx xxxx xxxxx 651 xxxx 916 x3ocx xxxx xxxxx Move Cap. : 1355 �cxx xxacxx x�c�cx x�cxx �oo�cx 614 xxxx 916 xxxx x�x x�oc�cx Volume/Cap: 0.07 xxxx xxxx xxxx x�cx �otxx 0.d7 xxxx 0.04 x3ot�c xxxsc �oc�ac -----------�--------------� �--------------� �--------------� �--------------� Level Of Service Module: 2Way95thQ: 0.2 xxxx xx�ocx x�cx xxxx xx�ocac x�cx xaacx xxxx�c �xx xaooc �c�x Control Del: 7.9 xxxx xxx� �ocxx xx�c x�cxx xxxxx xxxx xxaocx �cxxx xaocx xxx�oc LOS by Move: A * * * * * * * * * * * Movement: LT - LTR - RT LT - LTR - RT LT - LTR - RT LT - LTR - HT Shared Cap. : xxxx xx�c �cxxx xxxx x�cxx xxxxx x�cx 725 x�cxx xxxx xx�oc xxxxx SharedQueue: 0.2 xxx�c 7nacxx xxxxx �cxx xx�x xxxxx 0.4 xx�ocx xxxxx xxxx x�cxx Shrd ConDel: 7.9 xxxx �cxx xx�x xxxx xxxxx xx�cx 14.6 xx�cxx xx�cx �cxx xxxxx Shared LOS: A * '` * * * * B * * � � ApproachDel: x�cx�c�c �c3cxx�cx 10.6 xxxxxx ApproachL05: * * B * **�**,��***********************�************�**�*,�**�****�*******.**�+****��**�* Note: Queue reported is the number of cars per lane. Traffix 7.8.05I5 (c) 2006 Dowling Assoc. Licensed to CTS ENGIAIEERS, INC. MITIG8 - Mia-PM School PeakMon Jul 32, 2006 19:05:22 Page 1-1 2008 Future Background Weekday MId-afternoon School Peak Hour Traffic Volumes Tigard MITCH School -------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Level Of Service Computation Report 2000 HCM Unsignalized Method (Fl�.ture Volume Alternative) *:***�+�...*++.*..*+*...*++****+*.***.zk�*.�•***.**�**�***�*��**�*****�•***3.**� Intersection #5 SW 103rd Ave & SW Canterbury Ln *•.*3#:a.**��#:r+�.*****3�****.:.s•++***�.:.�*xr**r+��*■*t*+�******��********* Average Delay (sec/veh) : 5.2 Worst Case Level Of Service: A[ 9.4] **�.��*��:*****.�***«.�..�*******#*+.****t�.+***##*.***.***.�*#*�*****.****��** Street Name: SW 103rd Ave SW Canterbury Ln Approach: North Bound South Hound East Bound West Bound Movement: L - T - R L - T - R L - T - R L - T - R ------------�---------------l �----------------� �---------------� �---------------� Control: Uncontrolled Uncontrolled Stop 5ign Stop Sign Rights: Include Include Include Include Lanes: 0 1 0 0 0 0 D 0 1 0 0 0 1! 0 0 0 0 4 � 0 ------------�---------------� �---------------� �---------------� �---------------� Volume Module: » Count Date: 25 Jul 2006 « Mid-afternoon peak Base Vol: 23 14 0 0 11 40 50 0 19 0 U 0 Growth Adj: 1.05 1.05 1.05 1.05 1.05 1.05 1.�5 1.65 1.05 1.05 1.D5 1.05 Initial Bse: 24 15 0 0 12 42 53 0 20 0 0 0 Added Vol: 0 � 0 0 0 0 0 0 D 0 0 0 PasserByVol: 0 0 0 fl 0 0 0 0 0 Q 0 0 Initial Fut: 24 15 0 0 12 42 53 0 20 0 0 d Oser Adj: 1.00 1.00 2.00 1.D0 1_60 1.00 1.00 1.60 1.OD 1.d0 1.00 2.00 PHF Adj: �.83 0.83 Q.83 0.83 0.83 0.83 0.83 0.83 0.83 0.83 0.83 Q.83 PHF Volume: 29 18 0 0 14 51 63 0 24 0 0 0 Reduct Vol: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Final Vol. : 29 18 0 0 14 51 63 0 24 0 0 0 Critical Gap Module: Critical Gp: 4.2 x3ocx xxxxx xxxxx �ocxx x�c�ooc 6.4 xxxx 6.2 xxx�os x�ooc xxxxx Fo1lowUpTim: 2.3 xx�ac xxxxx xxxxx �ocxx xx�cxx 3.5 x�onc 3.3 xx�ocx xxxx xxxxx ------------�--------------� �---------------� �--------------� �---------------� Capacity Module: Cn f 1 i c t V o 1: 6 5 xxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxx xxxxx 115 xx�oc 3 9 x�ooc �oo« xxxx�c Potent Cap. : 1513 xxxx x�cxx xxxx xxxx xxxxx 881 xxxx 1032 xxxx x�cx xx�cx Move Cap. : 1513 xxxx xxxxx xxxx xx�oc xxx�oc 868 xx�oc 1Q32 x�ooc xxxx xxxxx Volume/Cap: 0.62 �cxxx xx�oc xxxx �oocx x�ocx 0.07 x3c�oc 0.02 x�c�or xxxx xxxx ------------�---------------� �---------------� �---------------� �---------------� Level Of Service Module: 2Way95thQ: 0.1 xxxx �ocxxx xxxx xxxx xxxxx �oocx xxxx xxxxx xx�oc �x xxxxx Control Del: 7.4 xxxx xxxxx xacxxx xxxx xxxxx x�oocx xxxx xxxxx xx�ooc �cxx xxxxx LOS by Move: A " � * # � * * * * * * Movement: LT - LTR - RT LT - LTR - RT LT - LTR - RT LT - LTR - RT Shared Cap. : �ocxx xxxx acxxxx xxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxx 908 �ocxxx x3ooc xx3oc xxxxx SharedQueue: 0.1 xxxx xxxxx xx�ocx �ocxx xxxxx xx�cx 0_3 �oacxx xxx�oc x�ooc xxx�cx Shrd ConDel: 7.4 xxxx �oocxx xxxxx xxxx xxxxx x�000c 9.4 xxxxx xx�ocx xx� xxxxx Shared LOS: A * * * * * * A * * * * ApproachDel: �oocxxx xx�ocxx 9.4 XXxxXx ApproachLOS: '` * A * ****f**�k***�1R4**********�I'#+t#******11**************#***'R'k****#{[***'k*Yr'k***********tt Note: Queue reported is the number of cars per lane. Traffix 7.8.0515 (c) 2006 Dowling Assoc. Licensed to CTS ENGINEERS, INC. MITIG8 - am Mon Jul 31, 2006 18:59:41 Page 1-1 -------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Future Background 2008 weekday Peak Hour Traffic Volumes (AM) Tigard MITCH SChool -------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Level Of Service Computation Report 2000 HCM Unsignalized Method (Future Vo2ume Alternative) �*:****�******.��**��*�*�+**�*:**�+*�+t+**��*�*****.**�*.***�**>*****+:*.**+**.. Intersection #4 SW 103rd Ave & SW Inez 5t *:**+r+�****t***********r.***++�*�:t�**��**+*.****�*�*****.x�*******+**�*.#**. Average Delay (sec/veh) : 0.4 Worst Case Level Of Sexvice: A[ 9.7} *►�+****t*****t*****�******r**�****rx**x***t�*�***+*e*��**w**�*�t�****��w*+t**+* 5treet Name: SW 103rd Ave SW Inez St Approach: North Bound South Bound East Bound West Bound Movement: L - T - R L - T - R L - T - 12 L - T - R ------------�---------------� �---------------� �---------------� I---------------I Control: Uncontrolled Uncontrolled Stop Sign Stop Sign Rights: Include Include Include Include Lanes: 0 0 0 1 0 0 1 0 0 0 a 0 D 0 � 0 0 1! 0 0 -------------�---------------� �---------------� �---------------� �---------------� Volume Module: » Courit Qate: 25 Jul 2006 « Mid-PM Base Vol: 0 106 4 2 30 0 0 U D 2 0 2 Growth Adj: 1.05 1.05 1.05 1.05 1.05 1.05 1.05 1.05 2.05 1.65 1.Q5 1.05 Initial Bse: 0 105 4 2 32 0 b 0 0 2 ' 0 2 Added Vol: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 PasserByVol: 0 0 0 D 0 0 0 0 0 0 Q 0 Initial Fut: 0 105 4 2 32 0 0 0 0 2 0 2 User Adj: 1.�0 1.00 1.00 1.00 I.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 I.00 1.00 1.0� P� aa�: o.a� o.s7 o.g� o_s-r o.s7 o.s� o.a� o.a� o.s� o.a� o.a� o.8� PHF Volume: 0 121 5 2 36 0 0 0 0 2 0 2 Reduct voi: o 0 0 0 0 o a a o 0 0 0 Final Vol. : 6 121 5 2 36 0 6 D 0 2 Q 2 Critical Gap Module: Critical Gp:x�000� xxxx xxxxx 4•2 x�ocx x�c�cxx xxxxx �xx xxxxx 6.9 xxxx 6.7 FollowtTpTim:x�aooz �ocxx �ocxxx 2.3 xx�oc xxxxx xxx�oc x�cxx �ocxxX 4.0 xx�oc 3.8 ------------�---------------� �---------------� �---------------� �---------------� Capacity Module: Cn f 1 i c t Vo 1: xxxx �ocxx � 12 6 x� xxxxx xxxx xxxx xxx�o� 16 4 �ocxx 12 3 Potent Cap. : xxxx x�oot xxxxx 1396 xxxx xxxxx x�ocx xx�oc xxx�cx 727 �ocxx 813 Move Cap_ : �x xxxx xxxxx 13 9 6 �ocxx xxx�oc xxxx �cxxx xx�cx 7 2 6 �ocxx 813 Volume/Cap: �ocxx xxxx xxxx 0.00 �cx�c x�cxx xx�c xxxx xxscx D.dO xxxx 0.00 ------------�---------------� �---------------� �---------------� �---------------� Level Of Service Module: 2Way95thg= xxxx xxxx �ooacx 0.D xx�oc xx�ocx xxxx xx�c �onncx x�ocx xxxx XX�ocx Control Del=xxxxx xxxx xx�o�x 7.6 xxxx xx�ooc xxxxx xxxx x�ocxx xxxxx xx�oc xxxxx LOS by Move: * * t A t * * ,t • + + +r Movement: LT - LTR - RT LT - LTR - RT LT - LTR - RT LT - LTR - RT Shared Cap. : �asxx �cxxx �xx xXxX �ocxX x�oc»c x�oc�c x�cx xx�c� xx�cx 767 xxxxx SharedQueue:xxx�oc x�cxx �ocxxx 0.0 xxxx xxxxx xx�ooc xxxx xxxxx �ocxxx 0.0 xxxxx Shrd ConDel:xxx�c �xx xxx�c�c 7.b xx�oc xx�cxx xx�ooc x�x xxxxac x�cx 9.7 xxxxx Shared LOS: * " '" A * � * * * * A ' ApproachDel: xxxx�oc xxxxxx �X 9'� ApproachLOS: * � * A *,r�**t:.��*,�.��**,r******«.***�**++*****.tf,r�*.,...:*..*.**r....*+**+******,r.�+**** Note: Queue reported is the numher of cars per lane. Traffix 7.8_0515 (c? 2006 Dowling Assoc. Licensed to CTS ENGINEERS, INC. MITTG8 - pm Mon Jul 31, 2006 18:59:32 Page 1-1 -------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Future Background Weekday Peak Hour Traffic Volumes (PM) Tigard MT'1'CH School -------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Level Of Service Computation Report 2000 HCM Unsignalized Method (Fliture Volume Alternative) �**,r:,r*,r«,t*�**,r*••.*�**,►+,r*,t+*�+.x+.,t*,t*.*��*.,t,t�.�t+*�**,r,�t**t*r**,t**.*wxx***«� Intersection #4 SW 103rd Ave & SW Inez St *,tr�,t:xx+a,tw*,t�,r3,t.trr•«�*.,r+r,►+r#x,re,r,t,t,t•r.*�***+e*•:rr*��***�,t+►***+,�*r,�*fr*+�t** Average Delay (sec/vehy : 0.2 Worst Case Level Of Service: A[ 9.2� *�*��*•.***.****�**��***t*•,+,r.*.***.***r.#,c.*.*+.*��*,r**,.*.********•+.*�***�x+**,+** Street Name: SW 103rd Ave SW Inez St Approach: North Bound South Bound East Bound West Bound Movement: L - T - R L - T - R L - T - R L - T - R ------------�---------------� �---------------� �---------------� �---------------I Control: Uncontrolled Uncontrolled Stop 5ign Stop Sign Rights: Include Include include Include Lanes: 0 0 Q 1 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 6 0 0 0 0 1! Q 0 ------------�---------------f �---------------� �---------------� �---------------� Volume Module: Base Vol: 0 40 4 U 160 0 0 0 0 2 0 2 Growth Adj: 1.05 1.05 1.05 1.05 1.05 1.05 1.05 1.65 1.05 1.05 1.65 1.05 Znitial Bse: 0 42 4 0 168 0 0 0 0 2 0 2 Added Vol: 0 0 0 D 0 0 0 D 0 0 0 0 PasserByVol: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 D 0 0 0 0 Tnitial Fut: 0 42 4 0 168 0 0 0 0 2 0 2 User Adj: 1.00 1.04 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 PHF Adj: O.BS 0.85 0.85 0.85 0.85 0.85 0.85 0.85 0.85 0.85 0.85 0.85 PHF Volume: 0 49 5 0 198 0 0 0 0 2 0 2 Reduct vai: o 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 o a a a Fina1 Vol. : 0 49 5 4 198 0 0 0 0 2 0 2 Critical Gap Module: Cr i t i c a 1 Gp:xxxxx � �cxxxx xxxxx x�ocx �oocxx x�ocxx xxxx xxxxx 6.4 xxxx 6.2 Fo1lowUpTim:xxxxx xxxx �ocxxx xxxxx x�cx xxxxx xxx�os xxxx xxxxx 3.5 x�ao� 3.3 -------------�---------------� �----------------� �---------------� �---------------� Capacity Module: Cnflict Vol: xxxx �ocx x�oacx xxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxx �xx xxxxx 256 xxxx 52 Potant Cap. : xxxx xxxx xxxxx x�x xxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxx �c�cxxx 739 xxxx 1016 Move Cap. : �cxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxx xx.�cxx xx�ot xxxx x�cxxx 7 3 9 xxxx 1016 Volume/Cap: xxxx xxxx xxxx x�ncx xxxx xx�oc xxxx x� xxx�c 0.00 xx�c 0.00 ------------�-----------------� �---------------� �---------------� �---------------� Level Of Service Module: 2Way95thQ: xxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxx �ocxx xxxxx xxxx xxxx x�oocx xx�os �oc3oc xxxxx Control Del:xxxxx �oocx xxxxx xxxxx xxxx �xxx xxxxx xxxx x�otxx xxx�oc xx�cx xxx�oc LOS by Move: * * * � * * * * * * * # Movement: LT - LTR - RT LT - LTR - RT LT - LTR - RT LT - LTR - RT Shared Cap. : xxxx x�noc xxxxx xxxx x�ooc xxxxx x�ocx xxxx xx�ocx xxxx 856 xxx�oc SharedQueue:xxxxx xxxx xxxxx xxx�cx xx�oc xxxxx xxxxx xx�oc xxxxx XxxxX 0.0 xxxxx Shrd ConDel:xxxxx x�cxx xxxxx xxxxx xx�oc �ocxxx �cxxx xxxx xx�ocx xxxxx 9.2 xxxxx Shared LOS: " * * * * * � * * # A * ApproachDel: �cxxxxx xxxxxx xxxx�oc 9-2 ApproachLOS: '" '' * p' **�r*+***r*«�*****��r*.w#+r#+**+...*r++,r*�rr*+*t*�*�t*�*****+*�:*�*:**,�**�,rr«*#,rt* Note: Queue reported is the number of cars per lane. Traffix 7.8.0515 (c3 2006 Dowling Assoc. Licensed Co CTS ENGINEERS, INC. MITIG8 - Mid-PM School PeakMOn Jul 32, 2006 19:05:03 Page 2-1 2008 Future Background Weekday MId-afternoon School Peak Hour Traffic Volumes Tigard MTTCH School Level Of Service Computation Report 2000 HCM Unsignalized Method (�ture Volume Alternative) **.*�*.*******�**x��*�.*x.*#****�*«.**.***.�***�..+.##:+##***.*+****•*****.***.� Intersection #4 SW 103rd Ave & Sw Inez St *****�xt***#*************#****i*t****��k*#********************##*�*R4**fff*t#*** Average Delay (sec/veh) : 1.4 Worst Case Level Of Service: A[ 9.51 ***.�*****..}**:��****t**+**�*•*�*.�**..�:�x..t*:**�****+..�*�+***...*.*+�++.*.. Street Name: SW 103rd Ave SVJ Inez St Approach: North Bound South Bound East Bound West Bound Movement: L - T - R L - T - R L - 'P - R L - T - R ------------�---------------� (---------------� �---------------� �--__--____-------� Control: Uncontrolled Uncontrolled Stop Sign Stop Sign Rights: Include Include Include Include Lanes: 0 Q 0 1 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 4 0 0 0 0 1! 0 0 ------------�--------- �� ---------------� �---------------� �---------------� Vo�ume Module: » Count Date: 25 Jul 2Q06 « Mid-PM Base Vol: 0 45 8 B 55 0 0 0 0 6 0 7 Growth Adj: 1.65 1.05 1.05 1.05 1.05 1.05 I.05 1.05 1.05 1.05 1.05 1.05 Initial Bse: 0 47 S 8 58 0 D 0 � 6 0 7 Added Vol: 0 0 0 o a o 0 0 0 0 0 0 PasserByVol: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 D 0 Initial �t: 0 47 8 8 58 0 0 0 � 6 0 7 User Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 I.00 1.00 1.00 1.OQ I.00 1.OD 1.00 1.00 1.00 PHF Adj: 0.87 0.87 0.$7 0.87 0.87 0.87 0.87 0.87 0.87 0.87 0.87 0.87 PHF Volume: 0 54 10 10 66 0 0 0 0 7 0 8 Reduct vol: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Final Vol. : Q 54 10 10 66 0 0 0 0 7 0 8 Critical Gap Module: Critical Gp:xxx�ac x�rx xxxxx 4.2 �ocxx x�ocxx xxxxx xxxx xxxxx 6.9 xxxx 6.7 Fo1lowUpTim:x�oaoc x�ocx xxxxx 2.3 xxxx �acxxx �0000c xxxx xxxxx 4_0 xxxx 3.8 ------------�_---------------� �---------------� �---------------� �---------------� Capacity Module: Cnflict Vol: �cxx xxxx xxxxx 64 xxxx x�000c xxxx xxxx xxxxx 145 xxxx 59 Potent Cap. : �oacx �osxx xxxxx 1471 xxxx xxx�oc xxxx xxxx xxx�cx 747 xxxx 887 Move Cap. : xxxx �ocxx x�ocxx 1471 xx3oc x�ocaoc xxx�� x�ocx xxxxx 743 �cxx 887 Volume/Cap: xxxx xx�tx �oaoc 0.01 xxxx �ocxx xxx3c x�ocx xxxx 0.01 xxxx 0.01 ------------�------- ---� �---------------� �---------------� �---------------� Level Of Service Module: 2Way95thQ: �cxaoc xxxx xxx�rx 0.0 x�ocx x�osxx xxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxx xxxxx Control Del:�acx�oc xx� �ocx�c�c 7.5 �cxx xxxxx xxxxx x�ncx xxxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxxx LOS by MOVe: * * * A * * * * * * # * Movement: LT - LTR - RT LT - LTR - RT LT - LTR - RT LT - LTR - RT Shared Cap. : xx�cx xxxx xxxxx �ocxx xx>cx x�cxxx xxxx xxxx x�ocxx xxxx 814 �ocxxx SharedQueue:xxxxx xxxx xxxxx 0.0 x� �ocxxx xxxxx xxxx �cxxx x�cxxx O.I xxxxx Shrd ConDel:x3oocx x�ocx xxxxx 7.5 xxxx �x�c xxxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxxx 9.5 xxxxx Shared Los: * * * A * ' * * * " A '" ApproachDel: xxxxicx xxxxxx xx�xx 9.5 ApproachLOS: * ' '' A ***irarx**irir*,k,t,t,t,t�*tit*t�*�t****,t*.r,t**+r,r**�***,t,t++��+x+x�,r*****,ktx,t,tert++r******,t,r Note: Queue reported is the number of cars per lane_ Traffix 7.8.0515 (c) 2006 Dowling Assoc. Licensed to CTS ENGINEERS, INC. Total Future 2008 Weekday Pealc Hour and Mid-afternoon Pe�lc Hour Traffic Volumes With Deve�opment MITIG8 - am Tue Aug 1, 2006 12:24:01 Page 1-1 TF 2008 Weekday Peak Hour Traffic Volumes (AM) Tigard MITCH School -------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Level Of Service Computation Report 2000 HCM Unsignalized Method (Flzture Volume Alternative) #k*****t#***#****f#*******��***#***#**X**tt*********#*f***R�***i*********��*#*A# Intersection #5 SW 103rd Ave & SW Canterbury Ln t*w****��:*t*�*�****��***�****+�*�*xxt:y**�**�*a****�*w��***�r**t:�**t****��t Average Delay isec/veh) : 6.8 Worst Case Level Of Service: B[ 10.9] *****.•*#*�******..***#�*#.*********:*.**•*.*****..:::t�***#*�******�***•�+++*�+ Street Name: SW 103rd Ave SW Canterbury Ln Approach: North Bound South Bound East Bound West Bound Movement: L - T - R L - T - R L - T - R L - T - R ------------�---------------� �----------------� �---------------� �---------------� Control: Uncontrolled Uncontrolled Stop Sign Stop Sign Rights: Include Include Include Include Lanes: 0 1 0 0 0 0 D 0 1 0 0 0 1? 0 Q 0 0 D 0 0 ------------�---------------� �---------------� �---------------� �---------------� Volume Module: » Count Date: 25 ,7u1 2066 « AM Peak Hour Base Vol: 16 19 0 0 9 22 40 0 40 0 0 0 Growth Adj: 1.05 1.05 1.05 1.05 1.05 1.05 1.Q5 1.05 1.05 1.05 1.05 1.65 Initial Bse: 17 20 0 0 4 23 94 0 42 0 0 0 Added VoZ: 48 0 0 0 39 Q 0 0 0 0 0 0 PasserByVol: 0 0 0 D b 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Initial Fut: b5 20 0 0 48 23 94 0 42 0 0 0 User Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.Q0 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 PHF Adj: 0.83 Q.83 0.83 0.83 0.83 0.93 0.83 0.83 0.83 0.83 0.83 0.83 PHF Volume: 78 24 0 0 58 28 114 � 51 0 0 0 Reduct Vol: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Final Vol. : 78 24 0 0 58 28 114 0 51 0 0 � Critical Gap Module: Critical Gp: 4.2 xxxx �000cx x�cx�oc xxxx xxxxx 6.4 xxxx 6.2 xxxxx xxxx xxxxx Fo1lowUpTim: 2.3 xxxx �oocxx �ac�ooc xxxx xxxxx 3.5 xxxx 3.3 xxxxx xxxx xxxxx ------------�---------------� �---------------� �---------------� �---------------� Capacity Module: Cnflict Vol: 86 �cxxx �x xxxx xxxx x�000c 252 xxxx 72 xx�cx xxxx �oocxx Potent Cap. : 1485 xxxx xxxxx x�ocx xxxx x�ocxx 736 �ooc 990 xxxx xxxx �ocxxx Move Cap. : 1485 xxxx xxx� x�ocx xxxx xxxxx 705 �ocx 940 xx�oc x�cx xxxxx Volume/Cap: 0.05 7000c xx3oc x�ocx xxxx �ocxx 6.16 �ocxx 0.65 �oacx xxxx xxxx ------------�---------------� �---------------� �---------------t �----------------� Level Of Service Modu2e: 2Way95thQ: 6.2 �acxx xx�ooc �ozxx xxxx xxxxx xx�c �ocxx x�cxxx xYxx xxxx xxxxx Control Ael: 7.6 xxxx xx�ocx x�ocxx xxxx xxxxx xxxxx �ocxx �000cx xxxxx xxxx xxxxx LOS by MOVe: A * * * " `` * * * * * * Movement: LT - LTR - RT LT - LTR - RT LT - LTR - RT LT - LTR - RT Shared Cap_ : �ooac xxxx xxxxx x�cxx 3oc�c xxxxx �ocxx 774 xxxxx xxxx xxxx �uoacx SharedQueue: 0.2 xxxx �oaocx xxxxx xxxx xxxxX 30000c 0.8 xxxxx xxxxx xxxx x�ocxx Shrd ConDel: 7.6 xxxx �o�xxx xxxxx �ocxx �ocxxx xx�otx 10.9 xxxxx xxxxx xx�cx xxxxx Shared LOS: A � * * * ' * B * '` ` * ApproachDel: xx�cxxx xx�oatx I0.9 x�c�ocxx AppzoachLpS: '` '` B '` *******�*�..�*.**.******��**..*,�:,.*.*.+**�+*****************+..*�.**********.* Note: Queue reported is the number of cars per lane. Traffix 7.8.0515 (c) 2006 Dowling AssoC. Licensed to CTS ENGZNEERS, I1VC. MITIGS - pm Tue Aug 1, 2Q06 12:24:38 Page 1-1 -------------------------------------------------------------------------------- TF 2008 Weekday Peak Hour Tra£fic Volumes (PM) Tigard MITCH School -------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Level Of Service Computation Report 2000 HCN4 Unsignalized Method (Future Volume Alternative) ***•*+e*t**�**�■*x**�«r�++.t***r***+.+**+t**.*�r*.#.****�*�***++t*f*�*+.***.**.* Intersection #5 SW 103rd Ave & SW Canterbury Ln xr**.**�*��**+**..**�***+***.*********x**«*�**t**�*r.+..t***:.�a•.•**�****�**�** Average Delay (sec/veh) : 3.9 worst Case Level Of Service: B[ 10.8J �****�**#**r*�#.«tt.***.#�t��****.*.**.***..**�*�**�:***+*.****�***.*.*r*..***�* Street Name: SW 103rd Ave SW Canterbury Ln Approach: North Bound South Bound East Eound West Bound Movement: L - T - R L - T - R L - T - R L - T - R ------------�---------------� C---------------� I---------------II---------------� Control: Uncontrolled Uncontrolled Stop Sign Stap Sign Rights: Include Include Include Include Lanes: 0 1 0 0 0 6 0 0 1 0 0 0 1! 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 ------------�----------------� �---------------� �---------------� �---------------� Volume Module: Base Vol: 75 18 0 0 40 130 35 0 30 0 0 0 Growth Adj: 1.05 1.05 1.05 1.05 1.05 1.05 1.05 1.05 1.05 1.05 1.05 1.05 Initial Bse: 79 19 0 0 42 137 37 0 32 0 0 0 Added Vol: 7 0 0 0 7 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 PasserByVol: 6 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Initial Fut: 86 19 0 0 49 137 37 0 32 0 0 0 User Adj: 1.66 1.00 1.04 1.00 1.b0 1.00 1.00 1.�0 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 PHF Adj: 0.83 0.83 0.83 0.83 0.83 0.83 0_83 0.83 0.83 0.83 0.83 �.83 PHF Volume: 1�3 23 0 Q 59 164 44 0 38 0 0 0 Reduct Vol: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Final Vol. : 103 23 6 0 54 164 44 0 38 0 0 0 Critical Gap Module: Cr i t i cal Gp: 4.1 xxxx �oocxx �ooc�cx xxxx �ocxxx 6.4 xxacx 6.2 xxxxx xxxx �ocxxx Fo1lowUpTim: 2.2 �cxxx �000cx xxxxx x�ocx xxxxx 3.5 x�cxx 3.3 �ocxxx xxxx xxxxx ------------�---------------� �---------------� �---------------� �---------------� Capacity Module: Cn f l i c t Vo l: 2 2 3 x�x xxxxx �oaoc xxxx xxxxx 3 71 x�ocx 141 xxxx �ocxx x�cxxx Potent Cap. : 1345 xxxx x�oocx x�ooc �ocx xxxxx 630 �ncxx 90? xxxx xxxx �ocxxx Move Cap. : 1345 xxxx x�oocx xx�oc x�ooc xxxxac 591 x�cxx 907 �cxx �xx xxxxx Volume/Cap: 0.08 �otxx xx�oc xxxx x�ooc xxxx 0.07 �ocxx Q.04 xxxx xxxx xxxx ------------�---------------� �---------------� �---------------� �---------------� Level Of Service Module: 2Way95thQ: 0.2 x�ocx �ocxx xxxx xxxx xxxxx �o�oc xxx�c xxxxx xxxx xxxx �oocxx Control Del: 7.9 xxxx xxxxx xxxxx xxxx �000cx x�000c xx�cx xxxxx �ocxXx xxxx xxxxx LOS by Move: A * * * * * * * * * * * Movement: LT - LTR - RT LT - LTR - RT LT - LTR - RT LT - LTR - RT Shared Cap. : xxxx x�x xxxxx xxxx xx�oc �oc�ocx xxxx 704 xxxxx xxxx xxxx �ocxx�t SharedQueue: 0.2 xxxx xxx�cx xxxxx xxxx xx�ocx xxxx�c 0.4 xxxxx xxxxx xxxx x�cxx�c Shrd ConDel: 7.9 xxxx xxxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxxx 10.8 xxxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxxx Shared LOS: A * � # * * '� B � * � * ApproachDel: xxxxxx x�o�xxx 10.8 x�acxxx ApproachLOS: * * B * **,r**.«***.*�**.,r*++.**�*.«.+****,r..+**:**•**r�***..*:*********•,r..*�***�,t+.*,r*+r*�* Note: Queue reported is the number of �ars per lane. Traffix 7.8.0515 (c) 2006 Dowling Assoc. Licensed to CT5 IIv'GINEERS, INC. MITTG8 - Mid-PM School PeakTue Aug 1, 2006 12:25:32 Page 1-1 Total Future 2068 Weekday Mid-afternoon Peak Hour Traf£ic Volumes Tigard MITCH School -------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Level Of Service Computation Report 2Q00 HCM Unsignalized Method (Future Volume Alternative) *«�*�***��**�********+*�*�*********��*�*+***************+********�***.*�******.� Intersection #5 SW 103rd Ave & SW Canterbury Ln *+x*****�****��#+**��****�***+�*x***��+***.+*�t:*****t*****+****+**�*****��**** Average Delay (sec/veh) : S.1 Worst Case Level Of Service: A[ 9.7] �*********t*******#***********************#******************************Wt**�#i Street Name: Sw 103rd Ave SW Canterbury Ln Approach: North Bound South Bound East Bound West Bound Movement: L - T - R L - T - R L - T - R L - T -- R ------------�---------------� +---------------� �---------------I �---------------� ControZ: Uncontrolled Uncontrolled Stop Sign Stop Sign Rights: Include Include Include Include Lanes; Q 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 1! D 0 0 0 d 0 6 ------------�---------------� �---------------{ �---------------� �---------------� Volume Module: » Caunt Date: 25 Jul 2006 « mid pm peak Hour Base Vol: 23 14 0 0 11 40 50 0 19 0 0 0 Growth Adj: 1.05 1.05 1.05 1.05 1.05 1.05 1.05 1.D5 1.05 1.05 1.05 1.05 Initial Bse: 24 15 0 0 12 42 53 0 20 6 0 0 Added Vol: 15 0 0 0 17 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 PasserByVol: 0 4 0 0 0 0 0 6 0 0 0 0 Initial Fut: 39 15 0 0 29 42 53 0 20 0 d 0 User Adj: 1.00 1.00 1,00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.OQ 1.04 1.OQ 1.00 1.00 1.60 PHF Adj: 0.83 0.63 6.83 0.83 0.83 0.83 0.83 0.83 0.83 0.83 0.83 0.83 PHF Volume: 47 18 0 0 34 51 63 0 24 0 0 0 Reduct Vol: 0 0 0 0 0 Q 0 0 0 0 0 0 Final Vo3. : 47 18 0 0 34 51 63 4 24 0 0 0 Critical Gap Module: Critical Gp: 4.2 xxxx xxxxx xx�ooc �cxxx xxxxx 6.4 ��c 6.2 xaoc�c�c xxxx xxxxx FollowUpTim: 2.3 xxxx xxxxx xx�ocx aocxx x�cxx�c 3.5 x� 3.3 �x�c 3oocx xxxxx -----------�---------------� �---------------� �---------------� �---------------� Capacity Module: Cnflict Vol: 85 xx�c �ocxxx �ocxx xxxx xxxxx 172 xacxx 60 x�cxx �x xxxxx Potent Cap. : 1497 xx�cx �ocxxx x�cxx xxxx x�cxxx 818 �cxxx 100b x�ocx xxxx xxxxx Move Cap. : 1487 xx�cx xx�x aocxx xaoc}c xxx�tx 798 xxxx 1Qdb �000c xx�c xxxxx Volume/Cap: 0.03 xxxx x�cx�c xxxx xx�c x�cxx 0.08 xxacx 0.02 �ocxx xx�oc xxxx ------------�--------------C �------------l �---------------� �---------------� Level Of Service Modu3e: 2Way95thQ: 0_1 xxxx xx�cxx xxxx xxxx xxxxx �ocxx x3acx xxxxx xac�cx �ooc x�cxx Control DeI: 7.5 xxxx �cxxx xxxxx �nacx �nqcxx xxxxx xxxx xxsocx xxx�cx xx�oc xxxxx LOS by Move: A * * * * * * * * * * * Movement: LT - LTR - RT LT - LTR - RT LT - LTR - RT LT - LTR - RT Shared Cap. : �ocxx xxxx xxx�oc xxxx xxxx �cxxx xxxx 846 xx�cxx �x xxxx xxxxx SharedQueue: 6.1 xxxx x3ocxx xxxxac xxxx �cxxxx xxxxx 0.3 x:ocxx �c�c xxxx xxx�ot Shrd ConDel: 7.5 xxxx xxxxx xxx�cx xxxx x�cxxx xxxxx 9.7 xxxxx �txx xxxx �c�cxxac Shared LOS: A * * * * * ` A * * * * ApproachDel: x�cxx xxxxxx 9.7 xxxx3cx ApproachLOS_ * * A * **�****�.**+**,r*:r**�*****�**,r�*,r*,:,�**,r,c**,r��+********,��******�*,r�**�****:**+*,c,r* Note: Queue reported is the number of cars per lane. Traffix 7.8.0515 (c) 2606 Dowlinq Assoc. Licensed to CTS ENGII3EER5, iNC. MITIG8 - am Tue Aug 1, 20d6 12:24:26 Page 1-1 -------------------------------------------------------------------------------- TF 2008 Weekday Peak Hour Traffic Volumes (AM) Tigard MITCH School -------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Level Of Service Computation Report 2000 HCM Unsignalized Method (Future Volume Alternative) •rt+k#t*tts*tw*tx*:*�+*+�r*�f�i++trt:*:Y*�#*t**k***+t*tw***rr*t**f*t�**��t***�* Intersection #4 SW 103rd Ave & SW Inez St r*•.************..�**:.**..�r.**..�+*****r��*r..**r+**.t********+...#**�+rr.r*�* Average Delay (sec/veh} : 0.3 Worst Case Level Of Service: A[ 9.9] �***+*.:.*..**+*�*******+�**�****t+xx.*�**..�*..***�.x*.**•**r**.********t*�**** Street Name: 5W 103rd Ave SW Inez St Approach: North Bound South Bound East Bound West Bound Movement: L -- T -- R L - T - R L - T - R L - T - R ------------�_---------------� �---------------� �---------------ll---------------� Control: Uncontrolled Uncontrolled Stop Sign Stop Sign Rights: Include Include Include Include Lanes: d 0 0 1 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1! 0 0 ------------�---------------� �---------------� �---------------� �---__------------� Volume Module: » Count Date: 25 Jul 2006 « Mid-PM Sase Vol: 0 lOQ 4 2 30 0 � 0 0 2 0 2 Growth Adj: 1.05 1.05 1.05 1.05 1.05 1.05 1.05 1.05 1.05 1.05 1.05 1.05 Initial Bse: 0 105 4 2 32 0 0 0 0 2 0 2 Added Vol: 0 0 0 0 39 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 PasserByVol: 0 0 0 0 Q a 0 0 0 0 0 0 Initial F�t: 0 105 4 2 71 0 0 0 0 2 0 2 User Adj: 1.�0 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.06 1.00 I.00 1.60 1.00 1.00 1.00 PIiF Adj: 6.87 0.87 0.87 0.87 0.87 0.87 Q.87 0.87 0.87 0.87 0.87 0.87 PHF Volume: 0 121 5 2 81 0 0 0 Q 2 0 2 Reduct Vol: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Final Vo1. : 0 12I 5 2 81 0 0 0 0 2 0 2 Critical Gap Module: Critical Gp:xxxxx xxxx �cxxx 4.2 xxxx xxxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxxx 6.9 �ocxx b.7 Fo1lowUpTim:�ocx�oc xxxx xxxxx 2.3 �cxx aotxxx 30000c x�ocx �oatxx 4.0 xxxx 3.8 ------------�---------------� !'--------------� �---------------� � -----� Capacity Module: Cn f 1 i c t Vo 1: xxxx x�ocx xxxxx 12 6 xxxx xxxxx xxxx x�ocx xx�ocx 2 0 9 xxxx 12 3 Potent Cap. : xxxx x�ocx xxx�c 1396 �000c xx�ocx xxxx xxxx �ooc�ac 683 �ocxx 813 Move Cap. : x� �o�xx xxxxx 13 9 6 �oocx xxx�oc x�ocx xxxx �oacxx 6 82 xxxx 813 Volume/Cap: xxxx xxxx xxxx Q.00 xxxx xxxx xxxx xxxx xxxx 0.00 x�cxx 0.00 ------------�---------------� �--------------( �--_------------� �---------------f Level Of Service Module: 2Way95thQ: aocxx �cxx�c xxxxx 0.0 xxxx xxxxx �ocxx �cxx xxxxx xxxx x�ocx �cxxxx Control Del:xxxxx xx�oc xxxxx 7.6 x�ocx x�ac�oc xxxxx xxxx x�oocx xxxxx �aooc xxx3oc LOS by MOV2: * '� * A * * * * * * ` ' MOVement: LT - LTR - RT LT - LTR - RT LT - LTR - RT LT - LTR - RT Shared Cap. : xxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxx xxxxx x�cxx 742 x�oocx SharedQueue:xxxxx xxxx xx�cxx 0.0 x�cx xxxxx xxxxx x�ocx x�cxx �ocxxx 0.0 xxxxx Shrd ConDe 1:xxx�oc xxxx x�cx 7.6 xxxx �oc�c xxxxx aacxx x�cxxx �ocxxx 9.9 xxxxx Shared IAS: * * * A * * * # '` ' A * ApproachDel: xxxxxx xxxxxx xxxxxx 9.9 ApproachLOS: * * * A *****�,r**,r***�**�.�*,r,r...*,r.*.***f#..#,r**,r...*�.#*.�.�c+�*****+**,r****�*+,r*•*+*�. Note: Queue reported is the number of cars per lane. Traffix 7.8.0515 (c) 2006 Dowling Assoc. Licensed to CTS ENGINEERS, INC. MITZG8 - pm Tue Aug 1, 2006 12:24:30 Page 1-1 -------------------------------------------------------------------------------- TF 2D08 Weekday Peak Hour Tra€fic Volumes (PM) Tigard MITCH School -------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Level Of Service Computation Report 2000 HCM Unsignalized Method fFuture Volume Alternative} ��•***.*.*******�*r***#*�*********�*�+*+r+.*.**********�++.**�..�r*#.*�.*«#�*�« InterseCtion #4 SW 103rd Ave & SW Inez St ***�+x****�+*�*�****t*«**�*****+r3�**«�**�**�****x**��*�**�*��a*We*w**********+* Average Delay (sec/veh) : 0.2 Worst Case Level Of Service: A[ 9_3] ****+*:***�*******��*�**�**+�*+*x�******�*******+******�#****:+**.�**�**#*�*��*k Street Name: SW 103rd Ave SW Inez St Approach: North Bound South Bound East Bound West Bound Movement: L - T - R L - T - R L - 'P - R L - T - R ------------�-----------� �---------------� f---------------� �---------------f Control: Uncontrolled Uncontrolled Stop Sign Stop Sign Rights: Include Include Include Include Lanes: 0 0 0 I 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 I! 0 Q ------------�-------------� �---------------� �---------------� �--------------� Volume Module: Base Vol: 0 4Q 4 Q 16a 0 0 D 0 2 0 2 Growth Adj: 1.05 1.05 1.05 1.05 1.05 1.D5 Z.OS 1_65 1.05 1.05 1.a5 1.05 Initial Bse: 0 42 4 0 168 0 0 0 0 2 0 2 Added Vol: 0 0 D 0 7 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 PasserByVol: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Initial Fut: 0 42 4 0 175 0 0 0 0 2 0 2 User Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.OQ 1.00 1.D0 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 PHF Adj: 0.85 0.85 0.85 0.85 0.85 0.85 0.85 0.85 0.85 0.85 0.85 0.85 PHF �lolume: 0 49 5 0 206 0 0 0 0 2 D 2 Reduct Vol: 0 0 Q a a a 0 0 0 0 d 0 Final Vol. : 0 49 5 Q 206 0 0 0 Q 2 0 2 Critical Gap Module: Cri�ical Gp:�oocxx xxxx xxxxx �acxxx xxxx xxxx�c �ocxxx xxxx xxxxx 6.4 xx�cx 6.2 Fo1lowUpTim:3ocxxx xxxx xxx�oc xxxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxxx xxxx �otxxx 3.S xxxx 3.3 ------------�---------------� �---------------� �--------------� �-------------� Capacity Module: Cnflict Vol: xxxx xxxx x�oocx x�ocx x�ocx x�ocxx xxxx xxxx xxxxx 258 xxxx 52 Potent Cap. : x�cx xxxx xxxxx xaocx xxxx xx�cxx xxxx xxxx �sxxxx 731 �ocxx 1016 Move Cap. : �3ac xxxx x�cxx �cxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxx 3ooc.xx 731 �ocxx 1016 Volume/Cap: xxxx xxxx �t�acx �oocx x�acx xxxx xxxx xxxx xxxx 0.00 xxxx 0.00 ------------�--------------( �---------------� �---------------� �--------------� Level Of Service Module: 2Way95thQ: xxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxx xxx�c xxxaac xxxx xxxx �cxxxx xxxx xxxx xxxxx Control Del:�otxx�c xxxx xxxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxxx xx�x �aooc xxxxx xxxxx xxxx xxx�cx LOS by MOV2: * * * : ,r r � � * � r r Movement: LT - LTR - RT LT - LTR - RT LT - LTR - RT LT - LTR - RT Shared Cap. : xxxx �ocxx x�oacx x�ooc x�ocx �cxxx x�nrx xxxx xx�ocx xxxx 856 x�cxx SharedQueue:�� x xxxxx xxxxx x�sxx xxxxx x�acaoc xxxx x�oocx xxxxx 0.0 xxxxx Shrd ConDel:��cxx x�cxx �t�cxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxxx �ocxxx xxxx x�cxxx xx�c�c�c 9.3 �oocxx Shared LOS: � * * * * "` " * * * A * ApproachDel: x�xxx xxxxxx xxxxxx 4.3 ApproachLOS: * * * A ,�*****,r,��*#*+**�+*.*��,r*�+**�*,r**********+**�*�*��*******,c�e«*:**«***«*.***�.*�** Note: Queue reported is the number of cars per lane. Traffix 7.8.0515 (c) 2006 Dowling Assoc. Licensed to CTS ENGINEERS, INC. MITIG8 - Mid-PM School PeakTue Aug 1, 2006 12:25:23 Page 1-1 -------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Total Future 2008 Weekday Mid-afternoon Peak Hour Traffic Voiumes Tigard MITCH School -------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Leve1 Of Service Computation Report 2006 HCM Unsignalized Method (Future Volume Alternative) **�.*...*.*******«�*�***�*****��**��**.*�*******x**xx+*..�.***:*******.####***�* Intersection #4 SW 103rd Ave & SW Inez St ****r*r***r�*i*+*.rr**r*r**a.r�«r**.***�*+��«*r.**�++#*r**.rr�**�«***.*****��*** Average Delay (sec/veh) : 1.3 Worst Case Level Of Service: A[ 9.6] +***.*.��x#*.x*.*.***#**********..***+*�*�..*..************�.**�*******��*****�x Street Name: SW 1D3rd Ave SW Znez St Approach: North Bound South Bound East Bound West Bound Movement: L - T - R L - T - R L - T - R L - T - R ------------I---------------� �---------------I �---------------� �---------------I Control: Uncontrolled Uncontrolled Stop Sign Stop Sign Rights: Include Include Include Include Lanes: 0 0 0 1 0 0 1 0 d 0 0 0 Q 0 0 0 6 1! 0 0 ------------+---------------� �---------------� �-------- -� (---------------� �lolume Module: » Count Date: 25 Jul 2006 « Mid-PM Base Vol: � 45 8 S 55 0 0 0 0 6 0 7 Growth Adj: 1.b5 1.05 1.�5 1.05 1.05 1.05 1.05 1.05 1.05 1.05 1.05 1.05 Initial Bse: D 47 8 8 58 0 0 0 0 6 0 7 Added Vol: D 0 0 Q 17 0 0 0 0 0 0 D PasserByVo2: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 4 0 Q 0 Initial Fut: 0 47 B 8 75 6 0 0 0 6 d 7 User Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.60 1.00 1.00 PHF Adj: 0.87 0.87 0.67 0.87 0.87 0.87 0.87 0.$7 0.87 0.87 0.87 0.87 PHF Volume: 0 54 10 10 86 0 0 0 0 7 0 8 Reduct Vol: Q 0 D 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Final Vol. : Q 54 10 10 86 0 0 0 0 7 0 8 Critical Gap Module: Cri t ica 1 G�:xx�ooc xxxx xxxxx 4.2 xxxx xxxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxxx b.9 x�acx 6.7 Fo1lowUpTim:x�000c xxxx x�ocxx 2.3 xxxx xxxxx xx�ocx xxxx x�ocxx 4.0 �cxx 3.8 ------------�-------------� �---------------� �----_____------� �---------------k Capacity Module: Cn f 1 i c t Vo 1: xxxx xx�oc xxxxx 6 4 xxxx xxxxx xxxx x� xxatxx 16 4 xxx�c 5 9 Potent Cap. : xxxx xx�oc xxx�ac 1471 xxxx xx�ocx xxxx x�cxx xxxxx 727 �sxxx 887 Move Cap. : xxxx x�ocx xx�ocx 1471 xxxx xx�ocx xxxx �ocxx xx�ooc 723 xxxx 887 Volume/Cap: x�cx �ootx xxxx 0.01 xxxx �ocxx xxxx xxxx xxxx 0.01 �ocxx 0.01 ------------l---------------� �-----------_-----� {---------------� �---------------� Level Of Service Modu2e: 2way95thQ: �oc�« �ocxx �onocx 0.0 �cx�oc �ocxxx x�cxx xx�oc �oocxx �oocx x�cx x�ocxx Control Del:�0000c xx�oc xxx�oc 7.5 x�ocx xxxxx �otxxx xxxx socxxx xxxxx xx�oc xio�xx LQS 27y MOV@: * * * A • * * * * '` " t Movement: LT - LTR - RT LT - LTR - RT LT - LTR - RT LT - LTR - RT Shared Cap. : xxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxx xxxx�c xxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxx 603 �cacx�c SharedQueue:xxxxx 3oocx xxxxx 0.0 xxxx x�axx xxxxx �cx�cx xxxxx xx�ocx 0.1 xx�ocx Shrd ConDel:xxxxx �ocxx xxxxx 7.5 xaocx xxxxx xxx�cx xxxx �oocxx xxxxx 9.6 xx�cxx Shared LOS: * * * A * i ' * * * A * ApproachAel: xxxxxx xxxxxx xxx�ocx 9_6 ApproachLOS: * * " A ****#**�*�***.*+:***.*.*...*.***�*.**,�*.*,�****....*�++,r..«..*.**.«..*..*****��*� Note: Queue reported is the number of cars per lane. Tra£fix 7.8.0515 (c} 2006 DowZing Assoc. Licensed to CT5 EIVGINEERS, INC. Ju1 , 26 , 2� )6 3 �26PM CLEAN WATER SERVICES 503 6814439 No •3822 P. 1 � pl� C� l� UUI� � os � X�,� ; ��+��_ I �. =, JUL � 0 ZO � By . ._ ...._ � � � File Number �6"-00 23,5�' C.]eanWate� Services � C)ur commitmcnh tb �1�v�. Sensitive Area Pre-Screening Site Assessment .lurisdiction Tigard, _,.. _ _. Data July 18.2006 Map&7ax Lot 2S1 11BC 2800 Owner ('alvin Preshvtcri:in (�hurc:h Appllcaht ��G��jpr�cs Site Address 10445 SW Canterburv Lane Company LDC Dcsieu Grouv . TiQard_!.)R_y7224 Address 2UOKS NW Tsnasbournc Proposed Activity modificati�n tn existinQ City Stato Zip I Iillshrn�, ()R �71.?A C�nditi�n�tl Use 1'ernul Phone 5f)3.KSK.4242 Fax 503.b45.550Q By submitting this form the Owner;or Ownor's autharizod agant vr rcpresontative,acknowledges � and :��rees that employees of Clean Watvr Services�avo authority to entor the project site at all reascmable times for the purpose of inspecting project sito conditions and gathering information relatf�d to the project site. olllclel u9e only hclow lhl!Ilne , OIIICIII i�s¢uuly qalUw tl�ls Ilnc OfFlelal uee only helow UN9 tind Y N NA Y N NA � I;� �� Sensitivo Arca Composite Map Starmwater Infrastructure maps Y?CJ Map# ?,S��r� ❑ ❑ Q as� �S�9 Locally adopted studies or inaps Otlier ❑ ❑ � 5pecify ❑ � � 5pecify_`._._. Bas�ed on a revlew of the ahove Information and the requirements of Clean Water Services Des�ign and Construction Standards Resolution and Order Nv.04-9: � Sonsitivo areas potontially oxlst on site or wlthln 200'of the site. THE APPLICANT MUST , PERFORM A SITE CERTIFICATION PRiOR TO 15SUANCE�F A SERVICE PROVIDER. If � Sensitive Areas exist on the site or within 20�feet on adjacent propert(cs, a Natural j i2esources Assessment Ropor�may also be required. ; , ; �� Sonsitive areas do not appear ta exist oh site�or within 2D0' of the site_ This pre-screcning � site assessment does NOT Qliminatc thc nc�ct to evaluate and protect watvr quality � sensitiva aroas if they ara subsequently discevered. This document will serve as your � Service Providcr lotter as required by ResolUtlen and �rder 04-9,Section 3.02.1. Alf ; required permits and appruvals must bc obtalned and completed under applicablo local, � state,and federal law. � � I The praposed activity does not meet tha definition of devetopment. NO 51TE ASSESSMENT ' OR SERVICE PROVIDER LET7ER IS REQUIRED, ` r Reviewer Comments: � _� - _....,.......--- --- � --- ...,...-- -�-- --- - Re�Jlewed By: Dato: ,� � G ' _ . ---......_._ _...__.. .. . ._. . . .. .._._...—_ i i Official use onl,y � Pvst-iY"Fax Note 7671 uaia a of � � �`�6 � Pey�s . Relurned[u�lpplic.ant i T� C h From � �� M�lil Tcrx � Guun[er i co�ep�. co. L)ate_1��liy� � PhonO tl Phone q �,�, ; f�3 ��' ; Faz u �A L. /C�/�. ��i/� Fax# ' � �� ;�-. � � �� 1 � V � � Sensitive Are a Pre-Screening Site Assessment Unified Sewerage Agency o(Washington County Jurisdiction �i�' Date Map & Tax Lot �l._� -_�gbO Owner Site Address ��n ��` �- -�'�� ~\! � , Contact p��a� Proposed Activity ' Address ��'�� C�� a� --- Phone ��nc_c.�. OQ �'i'ylt�j� _ _ - ----- ------ — V LQ-4Z-�jo�S---F--�-°�Z��►�ZSz Y N NA Y N NA � � � Map # omposite Map , 5, ❑ � � Stormw ter Infrastructure maps �� l.��q' QS # ❑ � � Locally adopted studies or maps Other Specify � � � Specify Based on a review of the above information and the requi�ements of USA Design and Co�struction Standards Resolution and Order 00-7: � ❑ Sensitive areas potentially exist on site or within 200' of the site. THE APPLICANT MUST PERFORM A SITE CERTIFICATION PRIOR TO ISSUANCE OF A SERVICE PROVIDER LETTER OR STORMWATER CONNECTION PERMIT. If Sensitive Areas exist on the site or within 200 feet on adjacent properties, a Natural Resources Assessment Report may also be required. � Sensltive areas do not appear to exist on site or within 200' of the site. This pre- screening site assessment does NOT eliminate the need to evaluate and protect water quality sensitive areas if they are subsequently dlscovered on your � property. NO FURTHER SITE ASSESSMENT OR SERVICE PROVIDER LETTER IS REQUIRED. THIS FORM WILL SERVE AS AUTHORIZATION TO ISSUE A STORMWATER CONNECTION PERMIT. ❑ The proposed activity does not meet the definition of development. NO SITE ASSESSMENT OR SERVICE PROVIDER LETTER IS REQUIRED. Comments: Reviewed By: � Date: E:UdminlDeslgn and Construcrion SrandardsUR Phone LoglFornislR�vised Pre-Scrernrng Form�-l7-OO.doc • . �L �EIVED AUG 2 4 2006 �� August 24,2006 CITY OF Ti: Pno�ect: Tyand MITCHSci►ooy OR06.062.T01 PLANNING/ENG , `�,��„E.t�� Ms. Kim McMillan City of Tigard 13125 SW Hall Boulevard Tigard, OR 97223 S�ijerl: Sig/�t p�tanpe at Propo�e�d MIT04 Sd�ool at SW 103"'Averx�e/5W Carxerbury L.ane- (ER77FIG4TION LETl£R Dear Ms. McMillan: I have conducted a study of available sight distanoe along SW 103rd Avenue and SW Canterbury lane at the entrances to the existing church that will provide the primary site access for the p�oposed MITCH School (one on SW 103`�and one on SW Canterbury). The City's sight distance standards are fisted in the Traffic Impact Study (TIS) RequiremeMs. The TIS requirements call for minimum sight distance equal to 10 times the posted speed from driver's eye height of 3.5 feet to an objed height of 4.25 feet, measured 15 feet back from the extended curb line or edge of pavement. The fotlowing summarizes the available sight distance after the tree branches on SW 103rd Avenue were tnmmed. SW 103'°Avenue has a posted speed of 35 mph and requires 350 feet of sight d'rstance. No posted speed was observed on SW Canterbury Lane, which has speed humps past the schoal site frontage. As a residential street, the posted speed was assumed to be 25 mph, which would then require 250 feet of clear sight distance. Sight distances measured in the field the week of August 25, 2006 are as follows: 1. Westemmost Canterbury Lane drlveway_(staff�rkiny entrancel Sight dist�noe (SD) to the east exceeds 250 feet. SO to the west is limited to 190 feet. However, this access is unlikely to be used by school staff because while school is in session there wilt be plenty of parking accessible via the main entrances. Orivers are untikely to use the secondary access and around the back of the site when direct access is available. In order to provide 250 feet of SD, the City would need to require the adjacent property owner to trim the bush at the base of a tree along the side of SW Canterbury lane (photo #2). 2. Main CanterburX Lane driveway SD to the east is dear back to the inte�ion with SW 103rd Avenue (about 190 feet), where Canterbury ends (photo #3). SD to the west exceeds 250 feet, measured 10 feet back from the edge of curb (photo #4). Measurement 10 feet back from the edge of curb meets minimum AASHTO intersection sight distanoe standards. (Unfess noted, all measurements were taken 15 Feet back from the edge of pavement/edge of curb). 3. 103'�Avenue drivewaY -+us�«o o�9�i�4`re�r;ve 5D to the north exoeeds 350 feet measured from 15 feet back from the edge of P`-�?6�o.aoao avement hoto #5 which meets City standards. F=c�f+455930 P �P ), E�,':5oro�ctsengineers.com SD to the south also exceeds 350 feet measured from 15 feet back from the �`VN.�seng�neers.co�r� edge of pavement (photo #6), which meets City standards. The applicarrt Hdhbao,cA trimmed tree branches on the street trees south of the driveway. .,,,��„ /ancouver.wA E3et1E�VltP.VOA ' Cceul dYUene.%C � $dCrdmEnlo.CA ��ff�flT.FL W W W.PdldIKOTpd I1y.COT :+�ITCN schoa S�grt u^�s:ar,i� R�v:Stu -3y` - A�ust 24, 2006 In conciusian, I hereby certify that the intersection sight distance at the access points for the MITCH School conforms to the City of Tigard sight distance requirements. Sincerely, ��.P�p PR�FFS �� NGIN�F,S,`Sip2 Howard RoH, P.E. � 16 40PE Senior Transportation Planner Attachments � E N „ c: Debi Lorence, MITCH Cha�ter School �'S'� �y 1 B �99 P�v ,�d Murphy, LDC Design Group hOyyp(�O PtRAT10N DATE� I1• 3 3 � � I i � ! I i � i i i 1 i � I ; � I � � c E � � �Tt [)1 :�Rt::\ 1 1 PIt:�L \ II_�1� �11TCN Schcx,l .��ce.; Pomt� Ti_ard. �)rr�,�,r, �j � . �*�: - .. _...� _ ` - � � - . � ry ,� ;� _i�y '�,j A4. .. �.�s.�"�{`�i�.�♦.� �i�5� #2_ � ' T ° - �K r' _ � � +Iit��T:'�� s�.y.�'+�a' a��r�y y'��r.�.� ��•k 'i- � - - - � e.w-�Ay`�/"^!��_T�.Y.�'�'�'��'�Y.'�rl,_ � T ^�_ �'��.=:��-� ..�. .R�">=.a._ . +..�'—�� ., - >:, =1: View EAST along Canterbury Lare From ��.�stern srte a�.�ss ��- �- ;� _� �. � ; . � r i �._ � Y` •-.� L.t-r:�'. ' y:�.... . t,» -7� � . -"�".-_...._. . ' ' �"�f .. � '. �., 1��a � .��lit;✓». ..�+r'� `� '•�' ? � � '•� #2: View WEST along Canterbury Lane from western s�te access, �vh�ch �s unllkely to be used (190 feet SD av� 'a~'e 250 feet rrou!� re u:�e �� ,•�� n ve^e�a. �r on ad�acent parcel) } �--� „°.Jt'� �� .:• , • +e'. -� - ,� ; - r r _ �•� � � �� ` �:;� � t_.;,�'� � a' -�. �� , #3: View to EAST along Canterbury from main entrance (clear to SW 103r0 Ave) Photos Taken by CTS Engineers.Page 1 iTl_Dl :�RL:� Tl PiC :�L � IE�1 ti M1TCH Schoot Access Points T _..f,t (l.� ,,,�, .' . .rtt i�_"9jr°'_ � w� +-, r I �/(. {. . . ,..,. �... - .. .��. '+:t'� �" '�-w -- .. __ .. . . -..;.,�.,n .�� _ _�,�„�,,,._„�,��.� =4: V�ew to WEST along Canterbury from main entry (> 250 R 10'from edge of pavement) / x!'hi. ' '�' �, -;,�-�;�-�: ,-� , � .� _ „��:. ��_� . _ �-� - �� r5� View to NORTH along 103rd (360 ft to flag, 15'from edge of pavement) �"'�, f "'� i a ` � ,�� ' � � iT'� . '• � �'i . �r J, ..- - -".Y;; ��±F t �'��y, _ .eA� k ��,�"� J°�� '�y+�'"'''f..# 'M' ~�� rt.`�'.�- p'.�..w��JY�n�i. L.. ....,� ..JMd"�'��^ .. . _n .. .-e... a . -1+�.'t1i+SDO��1`r �.°.3`_. ...'_.. � n �. _._.,._ #6: View to SOUTH along�103rd (360 R to cone,~15'edge of pavement) Photos Taken by CTS Engineers,Pege 2 Q � /'� .Q�t ,� ��.� ��:� /�/i %L��L.� - . • �-� ,:. �,� �v ��- T S C August 24, 2006 Project: Tigaid MITCH Schooy OR06.06ZT01 - _ - .- Engineers :� ; a Poroti mmpany Ms. Kim McMillan - - j� i'�� i� � ~ Ci ty of Ti gard . J i 13125 SW Hall Boulevard , < g 2��6 � ' ' ' �J Tigard, OR 97223 C�!" •�GY��'-dOC��a k : _}: `�� .��;+--i: °; Sc�b�eat: Siqi�t Distarx�e at Propased MITQ-1 Schoo!at SW 103"Ave,nu�e/SW Car�i�iury Lane- CFRTIFIGITION LETTER Dear Ms. McMillan: I have conducted a study of availabte sight distance along SW 103�d Avenue and SW Canterbury Lane at the entrances to the existing church that will provide the primary site access for the proposed MITCH School (one on SW 103ro and one on SW Canterbury). The City's sight distance standards are listed in the Traffic Impact Study (TIS) Requirements. The TIS requirements call for minimum sight distance equal to 10 times the posted speed from driver's eye height of 3.5 feet to an object height of 4.25 feet, measured 15 feet back from the extended curb line or edge of pavement. The following summarizes the available sight distance aRer the tree branches on SW 103`�Avenue were trimmed. SW 103`�Avenue has a posted speed of 35 mph and requires 350 feet of sight distance. No posted speed was observed on SW Canterbury Lane, which has speed humps past the school site frontage. As a residential street, the posted speed was assumed to be 25 mph, which would then require 250 feet of clear sight distance. Sight distances measured in the field the week of August 25, 2006 are as follows: 1. Westemmost Canterbury Lane driveway_(staff parking entrance� Sight distance (SD) to the east exceeds 250 feet. SD to the west is limited to 190 feet. However, this access is unlikely to be used by school staff because while school is in sessio�� ere will be plenty of parking accessibte via the main entrances. Drivers are unlikely to use the secondary access and around the back of the site when dired access is available. In order to provide 250 feet of SD, the City would need to require the adjacent property owner to trim the bush at the base of a tree along the side of SW Canterbury Lane (photo #2). 2. Main Canterbury Lane drivewax SD to the east is ctear back to the intersection with SW 103�d Avenue (about 190 feet), where Canterbury ends (photo #3). SD to the west exceeds 250 feet, measured 10 feet back from the edge of curb (photo #4). Measurement 10 feet back from the edge of curb meets minimum AASHTO intersection sight distance standards. (Unless noted, all measurements were taken 15 feet back From the edge of pavement/edge of curb). 3. 103�d A�enue drivewav H00 bo oWOR 971b�me Drive SD to the north exceeds 350 feet measured from 15 feet back from the edge af P 503.690.8080 pavement (photo #5), which meets City standards. Fso3.6as.s93o E hillsboro@ctsengineers.com SD to the south also exceeds 350 feet measured from 15 feet back from the www.ctsengineers.com edge of pavement (photo #6), which meets City standards. The applicant trimmed tree branches on the street trees south of the driveway. "''�'b°`°,°R i il lamook,oR VancoUV2�,WA BcIICVUe,WA Coeur d'Alene,iD SaCramentq CA Clermant,FL www.paratimmpany.com , MITCI7 Schob/Srght Distance - h �ED Page 2 August 24, 2006 In conclusion, I hereby certify that the intersection sight distance at the access points for the MITCH School conforms t� the City of Tigard sight distance requirements. Sincerely, t ��5��"�NG W E�si�� Howard Roll, P.E. e� 16 40PE Senior Transportation Planner Attachments v E N �r c: Debi Lorence, MITCH Charter School Oy�Y �y�8 �g9 P�v Ed Murphy, LDC Design Group Npyyp,RO EXPIRATION DATE: 11• ' ' STUDY AREA TYPICAL VIEWS MITCH School Access Points Tigard,Oregon _�`' �. � ♦; , . �..; i�:'� ,^ �,, �,;y � .. �,"' — �:: �r (� ..� �- e_ ; s � _�{..'_ �� `"'°-.._. "_` ._.... . .. . ...+*n� +r ��4� .� t'.id:.s-�¢. A�y.��,/ �--w.� 6 .��v �°�•7.�� ,�� .w.�.:,''� /"' 7",'��,y�'�I�� :.�r4�.. +. .v,,��.. �v v,,w `t�+e.Y��y ��'a�-r..� "s'�''��p�., :�; G1,-:� �+'�+,�°>��ti� �/F.l' „y+�.Tv.4a�.�"�pJA/��.Y�, y "'µ``a'"�..wr�:�.uik. . .��'�� ' �u k_ �''��-�•-�ya ,.a.A�^'O�`"'.:'�A''`� . ;RF+er . .. ,�1^ .pe, #1: View EAST along Canterbury Lane from western site access (250 ft to cone) . `� , . �� '�---�_ ,. : . A � �°?.�� " '^,. .; �. ....,�..-. ___. ."1F,�,r . . . . . ��. �a..,�. y`fi.. ^.7,�.'� �""�.""�..c� ..;�.± . . . . . , � '^�+w.......�._ . .... � +} ' a� , ;I'�ii �'� ��. �:a. �, .��`� ,*{ : n �'v T :?c � *°� �j rkt d 3J ^. ` Q,�� ,�„x � `�'.�� ,,,�_ , `'°`'� �:o:r #2: View WEST along Canterbury Lane from western site access, which is unlikely to be used (190 feet SD av�il�ble; ?_50 feet would require trimminQ ve etation on a�ljacent parcel) �, 'S ��r P . � J� �4� �� Y �tl'�Yf� 1 x� � `� � �� 4 � x"� �_.-4. ��F��• �i.� ... ��e � �� '�' ��.,�� . . �� . � � �' .,��y vxr- +'� �� y,• P � `.�.-�*...... � �.�, �'!� a °'A.� �SL:i''.6. 4.s..-...� al #3: View to EAST along Canterbury from main entrance (clear to SW 103rd Ave) Photos Taken by CTS Engineers,Page 1 . ' ' ' STUDY AREA TYPICAL VIEWS MITCH School Access Points Tigard,Oregon �+i�:'..�'"`,AT i..^" s��'.'±�ir`.`i`�..: Y y� �� 5y� ,' ry� ' � �� y�l �' � : , � ie.^..�f� �. ... �... . r �� , r �� >.. o ., a . ,. e::� v_ �.,_F.. _.�. . .� .._._„__ _ . �,� r . «. .. �_, -�....,N,.,�,� �' � . � ��r #4: View to WEST along Canterbury from main entry (> 250 ft 10'from edge of pavement) r � �� ti � `«�:-; �,��.�� . _ � � - � .. :�+:« ,+�$i, � ��..� 'S � �,� i�� .._ � :�"".. � '��I „�� .. � '�� . � , �.' �� c<-`"" �� aa� _ w n •��`• ' _- .,,..�r`'� j _ � � #5: View to NORTH along 103rd (360 ft to flag, 15'from edge of pavement) �� e �+w.G- 4 � � ;� �� ✓ m Y, 7 ► '<� .�:�' ,' S.. . � M y �; � 4� ._..i' .. . . �,.7"a`.�,.�4 ,r� wii�Iir. . _. .' q�. ..��°' „y,- Ax` . 4.e,. w sa'. ,7d, .: 3�� f�� . - '�� ,y��;�� +.� y�� • �° €y ,,z�„'' � �} e.. �' �,yz. � " � ,< �.� 'x� �r. ;'`'.N n. ��!�p.��if'yf� �'j�^T.: .. �"� `''� r�- 8�[ , . y,�t... • 4 " . . . 5 .: . �A. .x. #�.r�+. -"�+�r'�`�� - - ��. ,y ... � . .. ...".� . <...�_. . .. . ..... #6: View to SOUTH along 103rd (360 ft to cone, 15'edge of pavement) Photos Taken by CTS Engineers,Page 2 �` --- • ��' 1 �� N . ' � �c� f.j , � 1 aomplete the stree� liqhti.ng required undez the Frevious �tpg�icatior., CIIP 92-0001. Alao, tih� ov�rhead el9ctrical facilities paynent of� theAfeeuin-lieu o�u de qround�nqedas Pa t�df COP 929 OOG:L. � ( � �� ,,/ �C �'lt.e�'.K �eQ �''``d�- 3. SANIT.�RY SEWER: The sits is curzently oor�nected to th� 8 inch public sanitary s�wer l�.nes Za:ated in SW Canterbury Lane. The main line ha9 aufficient aaQacity �or the propoaed addltion to �h�e developa►ent. 4. STORM SEWER: The sito currently drains to an underground pipe connec�tinq to the eeisting underg ou d storn► sewern sy tem has eufficient capac�.ty for the si�e, � The Oni�i�d Sewerage Agency has established and the City has agreed to enforce {Reso2ution and Order No. 91-47) Surface Water Management Regulations requirinq the canstruction of on-site watex quaiity facilities or fees in-lieu of their cor�struction• alit� sfacility shows the p=oposed installatio��le, th t twill�treat the storm consistiing of a graded, grassy water run-off from the proposed addition to the impervious azeas. If the progosed faciZity providea t= theefeef in-lieu for� th°nui►£ the area, the applicant ahould pay treated impervious caz�structio� asea. Recou�►endations: PRIOR TO THE ISSUANCE OF A BIIILDING PERMIT TAE FOLLOWING �ONDZTIOId(S} SHRLL BE SATISFIED �R FINANCIALLY SECBREII�. 1. The applicant shall obtai.n a street opening permit to construct the new dr�ves��ys, the sidewalks, and the wideninq of tY�e exiating pavement along SW Canterbury Lane to City standa=ds. STA£F CONTACT: John Hagman, Engin�ering Depaztment (639-41T1) . 2. The applicant shall dedicate easements tor pub?ia sidewalk purpases in accardance with the final site plan and public works construction � p?ans. The dedication dacument shall be on City forms. Ir,structions are available from the Engineerinq Department. ! STAFF' CONTA�T: John 8a.gman, Engineering Department (639--4171) . � 3. The applicant shall install street liqhting along SW Can�erbury Lane 0 in accardance wi�h City standazds. ; STAFF CONTACT: JoP�n Has�[nan, Engineering Department (639-4171) � 4. The applicant shall provid� for an-site water quality treatn►ent, as shown on the site plan, and as zequised by Unified Seweraqe Agency Resaluti.on and prder No. 91-47� D�siqn calculations shall be in conformance with t�;e general requirements of Si�rface Water OualitY Facilities Technical Guidanc� Eandbook. USA, 1991n The desiqn report and calculatians shall be appr�oved by the �ngineering Department prior to construc�ion. STAE'F CONTRCi: Greg ��rry, Engineering Department (639-4171) ENGINEERING �Oi�RrfENTS CIIP 94-44 CALVIN PRESITYTERIAt� PAGE 2 ' V � � � `i��s� ��-r ��., � . C'a.-�' U ��-�-� 2�U - o000 - q�5od.� .� _ � �"�� Vl I��,t G�" ' ��,�(1�1,� �,°�'---�`t��c�t � � �� --� w�;�, ,-LQt��.t ��.GC.� � �� '� -�� f.��'�-- �,�Gt�,C.t.� � � - 9/I 5/2006 Conditio�s Associated With 4:42:32PM ��+CEL� Case #: CUP2006-00002 Condition Status Updated Code Title Hold Status Changed By Tag Date By UOU I BICYCLE RACK None Met EAE 9'1 1 '?006 EAE I. f'rior to building permits, the applicant shall provide a 6-stall bicycle rack in addition to the existin� onsite bicycle rack that is not within parking aisles, required landscaping or pedestrian ways. A revised plan will be required showing the location and specific design and location ofthe required bicycle rack in accordance with standards in Section I 8.765.OSO.A through D of the code. 0002 NOISE CODE None Met EAE 9/1 1/2006 EAE 2. Prior to building permits,the applicant is hereby notified that activities on the site are subject to the noise limitations of Article IV of Section 7.40 of the Tigard Municipal Code. The applicant shall certify that the proposed use will not generate noise in excess of the standards specified in this section of the Tigard Municipal Code. 0003 S[GN PERMIT None NOT MET EAE 9/13/2006 EAE 3. The applicant shall obtain a sign permit prior to erecting a sign on the site.The subject sign shall comply with the sign code(Chapter 17.780). 0004 REVISED FLOOR PLAN None NOT MET BSB 9/l3/2006 EAE 4. The applicant is required to obtain a building permit for the change of use/occupancy. Prior to receiving a building permit,the applicant shall submit a revised interior floor plan that shows which rooms will be used as classrooms. 0005 ADDRESSING FEE None Met EAE 9/13/2006 EAE 5. Prior to issuance of a building permit,the applicant shall pay the addressing fee if using an address other than the existing address of the proposed site. Note: Not using a different address. EAE. 0006 TRIM TREES/BUSHES None NOT MET KSM 9/13/2006 EAE 6. Prior to final building inspection,the applicant shall trim the trees and bushes specified in the Traffic Analysis report in order to improve sight distance. 0007 FINAL SIGHT DISTANCE None NOT MET KSM 9/13/2006 EAE 7. Prior to final building inspection,the applicant's engineer shall submit final sight distance certification for the three access points. Page 1 of 1 CaseConditions_rpt � � RECEIVED �ai�G 2 S 2006 Emily Eng, Assistant Planner �:;ITY OF TIGARD Community Development Planning Division ''r� ��-rF��?�' P l_�';i`�. .'�i��:�' City of Tigard 13125 SW Hall Blvd Tigard, OR 97223 CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT CUP 2006-00002 M.I.T.C.H. Charter School Dear Emily: On behalf of MITCH Charter School, I certify that the proposed school use will not generate noise in excess of the noise standards specified in Tigard Municipal Code, Chapters 7.40.160 and 7.40.180. This satisfies Condition of Approval #2 of the 8/21/06 Staff Report, Page 2 of 16. Thank you for your assistance. ��.�� .�.c.L� Debi Lorence Principal i/�/�'e�.-(� ((X�� h"y�� " �E G1111 `too� • , Page 1 of 2 , � � MITCH Charter School Cu�Z�.6-D�oo 2 From: L.D.Weislogel [I.d.weislogel@comcast.net] Sent: Friday, September 01, 2006 11:29 AM To: Debi Lorence; MITCH Charter School; MITCH Tigard-Tualatin Cc: Ed Murphy; Xavier Home Rueda Subject: Fw: MITCH Charter School Debi - Plz get a check for $ 1500 to the City for this condition to be satisfied ASAP. We can move then in parallel to work out the details. Check will be refunded upon completion of the installation. Thanks, /s/Lee ---Original Message-- From: Ed Murphy To: L_D.Weisloqel ; DEBI LORENCE ; Xavier Home Rueda Cc: Brian Lind ; Jonathan Grav Sent: Friday, September 01, 2006 8:46 AM Subject: FW: MITCH Charter School See message below. This will give MITCH and the Church some time to install the bicycle rack. Ed From: Emily Eng [mailto:Emily@tigard-or.gov] Sent: Friday, September 01, 2006 8:34 AM To: Ed Murphy Subject: Re: MITCH Charter School Ed, MITCH can assign a savings account to the City or write a check for the cost of the bike rack and installation, to be refunded when the bike rack is actually installed. This will satisfy the condition so that MITCH can get its building permit. -Emily »> "Ed Murphy" <MurphyE@paraticompany.com> 08/31 3:13 PM »> Emily, MITCH and the Church decided to place the bike rack near the main entrance to the school, between the two handicapped parking signs. You can see the location in the attached photo. The railing on the right is the access to the school. We will send you a revised plan for your approval. But...they have to order the bike rack, and we've been told it may take 2-3 weeks for delivery. Did you find out if the City will grant a temporary occupancy? Perhaps if they just show the City proof that they have ordered the bike rack, that will be sufficient security. Thanks. Ed Ed Murphy Comprehensive Planning Manager D 5�3.352-1136 E murphye@paraticompany.com 9/4/2006 , , Page 2 of 2 . . ` . Parati 20085 NW Tanasbourne Drive Hillsboro, Oregon 97124 T 503.858.4242 F 503.645.5500 E Hilisboro@paraticompany.com www.paraticompa ny.com OR: Hiiisboro,Tillamook � WA: Vancouver, Bellevue � ID: Coeur d'Afene ( CA: Sacramento � Ft: Ciermont This message is intended for the sole use of the individual to whom it is addressed. It may contain information that is privileged, confidential or exempt from disclosure under applicable laws. If you are not the intended addressee you are hereby notified that you may not use, copy, disclose, or distribute to anyone this messa9e or any information contained within this message. If you have received this message in error, please immediately advlse the sender by replying to this email and delete this message. 9/4/2006 ► � I �� 0�0� �M�1A11'3f'�f1 � � O � `Q A i.'L Q p v Q U � N � O � fl O n � 3 � n � � � C N � ii r� � � � .a '� � r � O 3 � � O � w n G � � � � n �,�b� ��,f '�LS�i'b�c,,�(��) �� aNnoz,��.�n�. M n "3'?'��YliJhd N�i�C+�3 .LVO� z1�ctMM nY_i.v�W `�C�IC1M.J .l'�r�+^IY.L�v�; '�'�`�-J ��L�d d-��-L•Zh� ----'1't�d1�i N{�H�,�f`h�n�- I _. '.. _ ' , .'_'_" ""�Vn:., �.��.vW�:,. �y�'�^'Y7'J n+�� "rr._`:-v�, »��;:..-ti r,a,,.a., .�.,,,s.. . nr.i �y�,+n -�r.w/a�i° r,7,�'�5�1? _vn-�r �� c.�+�.c .^,^!1' ^'�W^`s�o'i ��an �'x�cV'Srr, c�,�•�^^:'�1 n��e+ O�' -�!'v^'�dG�G -r.•��>p t.�..,:,,'�S f�,_�.r`�l � ��•L_! i 221+�'id J��y��N �d ��zt�t �ni nv� Wa�l� �.s.�lV`l"'!d'7�3 �1'�'�'bl�iN'd�.1- ��ilNb^id�r� �n-a��zl� cu- �y�ar�N �,*4 '"��rdM hr�ri�d.G-3� Mo't .k7n�t�a'?.��ddzl�I J��t'a'd �Nin�d �r+� M�N -� '� I; � T ;S �� I. . A° 4�ti ��.. �: � ^.•LV+"Jti+'"i'Dl . :V^✓� �.r'f'Y� I I ._,1�---r �� _—__—;i` �I ii —��v, e t^,-'—dq '�� t�'• i}'�iC',:� n.g� � �Y 22'•'• ;�'C@.+.�ii .r.�d.i�c""��.�' c�c`�10��v"�J c''�J� 4�� ' P ,C7�� ; I� • �� _T-__'__--- _ - " ' ' __ '_-_"'_ � ,. 1 � - __-_ -� Li('`'1^'J''C I\,ri!V ' . � ��''�t� .Li/ fy"��-Ua7�fr7 d�+� 'Y.iV.:�1 .�'- ^t}.P' ��1'� Y1(�1Gs�.A "��d0 (�'i'I �.J vu1f�0'�_� � , �p 3ry„1, ' ' �aa �7�,�^,:r-� t�.2� fP`r^r n' � - ��n . �'!,P"r �s_ :;:t�c 'r�w „'�� 2��nry�.as I � � ("��a��9 �iZ�+oA\ -'19 :�l Q�� rb' �`•d � t 1 i .' �!', � ; � sr.,.� -r.-� � �i- �_��_•,,..� �v,2 drt-b-�• � �� 7��,d .C,r,,r,. �.'Qy,,d �_�r{ ^'i i s�S (��z�wrin.n t�Nr,-,-�v�j ^r��.�r+ ++�'�m'5 �ct) . p�} rvr..o-��'�2'-r»•:m -r� v12 a � r s r.��•.-'ryi ;'r.+�'le '��'!':s"�"',d id �.� J��+1 e',.Cl ,�i _ �(S�S'd2��a7�nY"l, � sn;�.^i'.1 j� ^ri+711.tr't D�.:+, -�32i.ny� `e'�� 7r!��o:+4 3t•w�l n� . -7i y^'��'w �1 ��C � ,� �� 1'I �.^+'.r� '72r� �^AY•' � 7✓ ^�.. � �� C��vOV11'�2��Gb+'3% ;u�°u�'h 7!rVl�ii G�q7:�j�./..� 4,1. '� { � (ti^`o:'S �^-°-"��. �"`y�a•. �S7cY'^71L �'LDW Z9 Lrr� a% �cc�u^r'r7 N� .� �-�• G'•r- ��.:^il�e � M!�Ni ..� rd � ��" � '�y j� . ��W.-�t+r�^n� 2r?o'd) a-dy�'� �"'� :�� r � — , �-� na�r,�s ir�n� , � , \ „ --�? �� fi i �� 'i � 7':'4-i-4� '7Y r. � .- FX°• ';i ft. �✓-'y7 ,• ... . 2^^-� `,T�,YJ .'r7.: �_��v;;G �—� � r� Y -i '�J v � � � e� i _ � ; �;� ,_.� /.} � _...__..-�._.___—_'«._ �-�-,--�T---___F,_-.�,...z�yz��---c_.==-_-= ___._- '_`__ ___.,r--.--______- �' ,�� _--.�-``\ '- _ � ` � y� . \ . - .�.� ;, t_ __.;-- ; �� ._._ � , �_ . _ — -- . _ � - z��- - _:.:�� -_ - I� �` . , ,� .,,�� 0 '� �"� ,,i,' . � ,;` - 4` z��., «' .�; . , r� : x-: :�r• .' � t r �� ' � t r>� ' .:Lh, � �+i, I ♦ `�� {_�5�� (.!- ' � ��'`, i�`� t''� �Jr��,,,� +�.. �,.• �-- t , � : C '�' � � ` ' - ' �,��c. !. ' t • � : �:� •( 't -t ,f" �r``�•+. ,� ; � _ ,. � .'�•� � _ _�r.y-4.,. •�, i � ,�� .,•ti�y�� IS:¢�. •s� :� ��_ �-Lrr :`:*. ,�}1'�rr � . � _t � f � . p. .�� ;1� �. ` +`�`i +N ..�' ,_�� 'i`j�Y ,1. I. M1�� t•' t i�' �'tf� } �' i�• �#� ,( .� L� Y`f'Y.� � :'+�.w'�„� : f #. y - .; �4(t t� � � 'x• ��•�: .• -.t `�`� ..t. ' r J , .�M l. �' � +t�' „ . . _� ' �. •�"Y!��'�r . - ��. / M« j �•>�° � Kf M I�.. �] . y+ _ G'�.�� { � .i7 t., . • ! ' -'( � � 7� -------__---- ---� � ' -- - b� ----�c- � -T-- _-- ---__ , . ' � I . � �� Gnu�.�-�r�� • ��v i (� �r�.►.i.} . ' I � #�I�-� r-�c�k- i N�rAt..��-r�p�! 1�-Tx.1 L.- _ __---__..__ ._ .__--- C�� _ �',�" LETTER OF TRANSMITTAL j�j�'`�'f, L D C �F��F � o DESIGN GROUP Date: AuguSt 28, 2006 p�� 'iry� � 8 Z�CC To: Emily Eng, Assistant Planner � , � r •Y' -+ Firm: City of Tigard Address: 13125 SW Hall Blvd. (LDC) ,1ob No.: 1361.001 Project Name: MITCH Charter School Agency No.: CUP2006-00002; VAR2006-00069 Plancheck No.: We are sending you: � Attached ❑ Under Separate Cover Copies Description 3 Plans for Bike Rack These are being transmitted as indicated below: ❑ As Requested ❑ For Your Use � For Approval ❑ Other Emily- here are two drnwings of the site,a photograph, and a specifications sheet showing the location and design of the bicycle rack. This should satisfy Condition #1 of the Conditions of Approval. As you can see in the photograph, the bicycle rack will displace only two smnll shrubs, which will be relocated in a nearby landscape area. This proposed location is under a parking lot light, and adjacent to a concrete sidewalk, so it is a great location. The bicycle parking is within 200 feet of the primary entrance to the school,and at the top of the ramp to the handicapped accessible entrance. It is not visible from either 103rd or Canterbury Street, so MITCH will pince a small directional sign near the main entrance to the school. Let me know if you have any questions or need addition 10085 NW TANASBOURNE DRIVE �nformation. HILLSBORO OR 91114 PH 503. B58. 4242 F% 503. 645. 5500 WWW.LDCDESIGN.fOM (OAPOAAi[ oF��E Signature: Ed Murphy HILLSBORO, OREGON TIlLAM001(, OAEGON Tit�e: Comprehensi e P nning Manager YANCDUVER, WASNINGTON cc: Debi Lorence; Lee Weislogel BEILEYUE, WASHINGTON COEUR D'ALENE, IDANO ROCKLIN, CALIfORNIA CLERMONT, FLORIDA - ' s.,,� �* � �;�; � j i ' '��' • ' . Y^-�'� �v. � �� i � 4 �' � :' . � .�..'ti�qf,. � it��l, Y.� �'� '�'� ,._`�, �y. ,� ; �,� � _Q� � 5 �# � ��. �{ f 'i. r�' � ..'{�� i"7Sf�.' ! . � ; .\ . . `.!Y'r'�•'��`�'� � � �•� •' f. � _�, ��` ..�. ;et;�. f � � � �� '� � x t ' ' �' �• � I, .d, �', �� , �' '1 '_ .. , � �. �; �� '�. � �_i' ' �. � ��w �*/� tiY° �.'{ I i 4 `.._��..Y� .� j V r ., C k+�E� � 1 � [ �:�1 _ �.�� f� �� N�; �.:.� � �� I -, � ' ; 1 , _ � �� . ,� . - � � "`==;e.. �� ` it�., � � 11r' 4 i T "_ '� �� i .,i'_ � . -�— -_-_ -�� ,;. -, - ��:. •,,;3j� 4 �+- -�.`M i;3�-__--�...�r.,-��._.c~ _-_-_. j - - _ - _ �_ ,� ;� _ " - - _ - - _ - - �. - . - -- - --:...._ _ . . �"'--+r- _ ��.�.�► �! _.j"'_ � _� - , _ ' �►�-' __.' ' ... 1�_ ,..+�- . _ � � _— _ _ - __ -_.-�..�- ..�,i�a - —- - - - �_ _ -- _ _ __ - _ _ __ . .�- _ ° _ - -�., � - '� - - - -- . �= .r - - - _ ..�-,�..�� r ' �'s�. - v-.�. _ - - ---�_ - ��--��'-�_.._ - ��G�'C��:� �� -�� f ' . � o ' � u ; x � v � . � � 0 ! ; GRR.9Sf-P �S2QC f� ' CLR-9-SF-P 3 ; : _— - ----- — GRAMERCY " CLASSIC° GRAND STAND � _ ___ ___ � o` The Gromerry" Rack T1�e Cbssic" Rock The Grond Stand is on ^ � economicolly priced, nx,�edly , � With a subtle whimsicol touch, Like an iron fence around an consiructed bicycle porking p the Gramercy'" bike rack English garden,the Classic" o rack for tfie homeowner,small ep g�Yes a nod to history with its �s a functionol yet ottrodive retailer,or small office. hs ^ old-foshiorx�d high-wheel bike touch ro any ernironmeM. Z ' design,buih into a rack with the This unique bicycle rock blends one-piece grid frame is 1-1/4' � (32mm)0.�.structurol steel � latest in fundional capabilities. into the landxope with a Handcrahed and hand-welded, tubing with 3/4'(19mm)O.D. space-saving design.Made of o rt+e G.oR,ercy°offers superb ��.��+��o�� structurol steel verticol spacers z stre ond durabil' Rack welded in ploce.The Grand ^9� �M sherx�th a�d stability. Rack con urations of 2-to 9-bi le � � Stond holds 6 bikes and is oWC fi9 � con urations of 2-to 9-bi le � ca ities.Availoble in awiloble in standard powder t , � Pa P� bicycle copocities.Awilable in �,/ � coat or powder coated stainless p�,,�coat or powder-coated coat colors or a hot-dipped `' steel galwnized finish , stainless steel ' � • - � .�'�� •t'�' ':�' �` �` " . g ' ' ' . ` L`. � y� ,; � �;-�i �^�.+ �1 �+. . � �„ •, I . '� .. . .. , • �, ,1. ��, • I 17I�) .. "�J' . . . ,. � . � L6' ,r� f _ .w ' � ti� . � �.. ; � i �' .. �� ♦ A '�� ^ �`" r ij9i !}��s-� ,f 1� � I A''L �`�"` '��'��'} . � .� ... . � � t..�i ��F'� ��-�� `�c J�' ,� � �� *a � � ,* �.� . .S . .� � :,.t,_,yh�,�-. I . , R�' :;t r .7ai•� ,'i ��7' �� ,e� . �; i8�'a�.... �sr�e-r-...-. .G:.. • <i - �, r � �� .y ��.�' — / `K 1` ..i; �• �y �� f�� d "�'��'a j . ••�',l s�i� • ,, r�r'. a 7 ..�r��' �� r � t .:s r� . ..,� � , , f i !'��+� . . �, �. ; ��,� � .'"�,xa ��`� �� .�... �. �i�� 4�� 1 � j- �� y. �� '� / , f.;-� - ,� �� •u-.,; f� � r f �� t�l '�. , ; ��'�� J .� .< � a � ti'i � ..��AA;i' � r r r fl � # �X, 'i11 �'1, i�' ,''jl�� G: t��s`��'k,�'� � • �,. ' � , ,,� ,,� , , ti °, ' ,�,,�1��,4,,� ��"� ' r� ��f��,.; .. ,' �R' .. � �� M �! „ c a� � � ""��.�. ., . f', � ,�l. `.r-�' i: ��=rM ".,'b :.7 -.,'�. . .. � :r.' :� '{a 1��1. .1^..`� . � .. . . . � ? �� . .., . �C^ `ic'.``�.-f`x ._..__. ._.._... � - :. .:'� ....__.._....__._.�_-_ '. �,-� k •.••_.;�;i.3,1l.a:a"�^aR.s'�iiFTaif[iifiY3s'viw'�..-:.:.� +lil+bm,.-,,_�, . �. . . nansr�i�ry�er�u�ar�raiw#w�1RFas�..�: Y � i � '"; � �� ` 1 1� � ; ti ::.� t ��s�- ; '�;�� ,.- � ;:,�. � � O T I �-' + . � � I .�* 1 , ,�;�;, o o� � : � F �✓'�� {�', �" Q .? '�� , , „� W � �,,,,� �,�, ,,.. V • � �'�` _� '��, o � � ;;�` , � � �,1 i ; ;� �,�� 'ks � w��''q � �-- � I ; ,•,�� J � I _ "� , ��; ��kr��`�. •"'°�'_. � ;� ' , h "`� lti k}+, F — � i '�. � j+.� �.,.. ,,�, �,, ��+ �� , ; �� -��.. "�..�rr`..'. � i Y�� ~� ' �►_..ri�v� 'Y �� ro�as� �icY�e "ra�� . C..T.._. _.._. _.._.._..—_-_-==-_-_-_____---_-_�--_--- —.. _.._.._.._�_ "° _.._.._..__ , —_ —_-- - - -- � .. .. •�:�° �,! I� - - - - - - , ,.�'�, .� "'^� � � -- --_ _ - - _ �� b . _' _ _ _ '__ - -. _______ �- 'q b . --__ ' - I 1 I 1) 5� I Ycv:M "_" -____-_____'___'_ •wno� -____-" , '_"__Y:e-_' ' ._ .._ . : .0 . �I �I ! '__'_-� _ � r "'' _"_' _ - __�' _` •,.� ' r�� ' 'r- i � /� i � � �f=7:. � � � � i �� .�.n Y.SII. � C�L.' �t� I � �p �, � .\ � I �,,I ' Z � � ,�,m____, ,4. ' � , ' � �� h � U �- - "'' ,_`\ ',, .r = � '� '' \ -__-� � ' � !�: ; � „�-- � - _ �,:'� � / "'" :: �� 1 �� ' � � 'Y, � � � � �.. , � ; ti�, �� i I = I ; �:? � /� ��; , � �,� � `` ' ' ' '� ~''I � � I � C� z ; � � • � ..�, ..M, �, , ' �� _I I I. `_ -' ,i � i, "� i' rw aua� i aur.w �� i i i .i'l tl � � i i � I .r .- � i � i , �r� i i i nM i / � � , � i � � W i � � . i i i;i i ��'� Q 2 I � i� � -_. '____' � � � .�ov>sco e��u�.c \ `� i � �.i�� -� �� .s�,.z��w� � �j ,� ' �' ',� � �u Q '� , � \`, �� , �� . � �;� `�� ', �-• -- --- - �, � ` L �` �'� ; ' ��j � �— 4 � �� --"� r1 ai rt ��l n c? i• ` ��, ; �' �:I� I I �- > - `` ^� �� III m ¢ __ , _: � � �� ;�. avt tTc�1 ('� �er ao) , ; ; `� �, �� ?' � L.._ v' � L � ----_, ; ` �� ,:,,.:,��. ,\��. — ----- --`�T— ---1 --� � � ��! � J � W �.` ' - =� •,�� "�a�� '"°' � c �'I j r i I�i � �.� INEZ � o �. '"° ` 1 � � i i i i i• ¢ ��-- Z � _�,- '-- _ �.o. � i�. 1 \l' ' -� i .'� ' ` i'i�� ° I � ] � i�i � -� i � ��'' rry �1 �!1 1i l____ I 1 �� ' �/ (�^� .i�� r Q � i i / J !cnsnr�c euaarc cns��w swuvw � i i � ��' i i �i ti 3 I I � i """;I� i � _,' ' ' �� i ' � I i ;i r� � i ; �' � �' ii � �' � . li � , " � ; � �� ' ' ' .i� • � � � � 1 /�' � J� � � c I � � I �� 1��•• EMNW WIWG � \ 1 / �� 1 I - �I 1 '�__ ��1 : I �� % �� /;� I il � � I� I \ � y' J__� I � �' /� i I I � � �� i__—�___) 1 /' �� /'/ ,.I� ' • 0 '1 / I I , e� I �i � ' � � � � � � � ' � ' /�' � �I � � � '� � ; . �. �, I i l � � � e� � � � ,• � I ° a� ; • -__ � � , � i �'� r` � ! �� r ! r (� _ '� I � i o cn � x_T,{i __'- - '' i � 11 ` 1 ( i i i i ' �' - tl T C � ��'� -'_'__ �' I - \� � 1'� � � � � i � �i l ii i � � '� � � ' ;r-'-^ � � \ � � i �� L O tl \ \ t ` i � � ' y i p �' � ` � - - \ � \ \,` \ � 1 1 ` `� j , v � ,, \� � `, �`\ ` ` � � .. . ... � •. ^_` : �.'_� \ � ' ^� 1 � ` � � � ` � I � _ � � ' . _ � � �.. ,._ r ` b'Y^".0 \ . � � i � i • _� �, ` � � � �.I_. .._�.=._ t .._..�' . ._.. . ..�..—.._..—.�—.. ..�..—..—.. ._�.— .J...—.) .._..—;J—.. _ _ _"_ — • , , � \ r� I , �� ' � � i % �,.a,�.�-4;' � '� i I ; I / `�� i ` - -`/�=` -�- - - ' �- - - ----�4 I _ _ _ _ _ _— _'\ 1.` I ��4 ` In �—' _�' � I � e. . a I Q =N�ouxt W _.._.._.._..—��,.r� .._.._.._.._.._.._.._.._.._.._.._.._. _.._.._.._.._.._.._.._.._.._.._.._.._.._.._.._.._.._.._.._.._.._.. � z g �.� cenewc sc,u.e ' � u+ve�srrs wc ro e[ sm�ar,�a�.. I I �� rw�sac�ico w wn[n fmi-ru�c uma�,aws suu Mm�c ins n�w�io w nw¢ owa wn��unm s.u�s wn�u��rt�om ra �a..aw ce... W � u ^.[1�av,�1a N IM wn�insN111 sl Vh� Gmwd M Y+!>�u I�b �µ�� 0� _ WKCING 1ME 3101W OPMI IMEi «��Tab1W.MMSIIS�IM��N MT�bv le M na!F Mel �a RT IR �{ CAIMAAIS YILC O C4i!IIIM lINL MI�YL�Iqtl ��.Y D� 43 t 6£Y�TIN TIIOOESS Q MOT IES MYI 1/�'MM 4R.�O�Ri101EL LXf el IIWa Siw/v0�aW CeYr � �i ' MII LWIECING M Si0o1 EIUM lMi Ca'.�n inuN�m GwN - 5-�9-00 ��5 �. flEEl G10!9,9 9�41 R MFl1LLT CWim N!O[�M. $B dl 1RID COMOIEIE GNIBA9N5 91NL NAVE�WiLLI TIIOWE]3 01{' w�"°E�� e e[�vaaa�cm wn�M wn�e'o.c n u�r nw 2�• .w� iz,e o .so' ��i�'�a��r� � �w N PAVED Af�AS �'.,� �-�" �.,_ -� C1 o , SEEENLARGED�----------------------------�-------------------- AREA SHEET 6��.��,rv r �1 EASE4ENT I IC U1i�i1� I I 2 �I 2 I EX INLEi-- �� 6'W/L tP:MtN . I iE 79 55 [��o's�oxv m��M ' _ _ __ _'_ __ _ — 1=i89'_ _ .. � IE 79 10 �ND VAULT � � _ — —.., _ --. — i,,'� — — — — — ___ — — _ �.}5' . � � ...,..__ ........ _... _ .... ..._. . .. ..... .. .... _ ... _. \I � . .. . ._..... .� E% OUTGALL � f— ' _ _ - � .. -�s. . T , :.� _ -. -_ � 10'UTIUT -.. __ � -� so � � , � E�. 71IITI II�1 � � tt � .. . � ___ _.__. . . -�. _...� � �79 ` � �Y� -'- ��-_ i.�PN .. ( _ '� I �7� EAY4EN ,� - ._.. . .._ _ -_ --_ - -- -..... I TO�E�1BlMDONED \ ' - _...__. - ...� HYDRANT ASSEMBL� ��" —�— -'— �ppp /� - {._. � � �� , `- - ---'. ><'__� -_ ---- --_ — -= 7e.tS- -- — � ___ � _ _ I � _ �. � �——— —�� YOPEO PCFMN iE RYN ` I` — — \ �\ IL�\ �_S __ .o I I � � I I �a} 1E F�NRN UMf%R L��"VK ' � \ \ � \ � ��I I � n��. •i I E INSiALLEO AT R4 8I.00 Arb( �rws�1 row��u I .via EX_C9_ \ \ c r nc I a sr�_s,zo / w PaNT.fIELD iE B0.�5 rm.q�n ore.w.nw s'o.0°'^ � \ �i•xir � ..-� I''. � c.a..2� i I ^'"°� a a a,w '� I I \ \ \ \ s.nwr I I ' CanrEtT TO Ex. '" RIM B3. ��b �•��ns'' �'�1Lie � PoFY ELEV. �.. I .-:n' aaaoso i.aas' i RIM 81.50 �n�nwi�nn-�-?-v eR I �'u�°.''0 � � � � � \ 1 1 � CIIT IN 6�MJ.ttG I � IE 80.7� I 5.a.oma s'0.�`�4 E .CO ' �a� \ � �\ \ ' TEE W/6'FLC�MJ e.«e,.nnm..caw. .s ca,� � l 1 I I IE 80.27 4�8 RR 4uU�C11RP5 R % \ � I � RELOC�ED � \ / / • �c v� I I R\M ea.os I ` ucNT vo�e � \ � \ \ � 11 Il ` 'c.v.�w�� _� '� n �a+c v�r�[rm so��o � �'. ,..... �, uGr�i�\ � /� s.�/:os¢eo� " -'°v �� \ � \� \� �.__ I ! AEE �vr. Mwn �� . ' .__-, i . _....� , i.�.m IE 79. '-.. . . -; � �\ Ol / i=oa�mo s.000w °�"°B Ex uGr+rPO�� --- � � flE�OC�TE E.. i.iz9i. 1 \�� --1 i i ; , �� . �I....._. F. ��. � � � \\ 1CHi POIE / z.orow i�.v'�c \ � I �; I ' \� � , y ' �a� , �-�a� �` \� \ �� ' i ; , �� I I . / ° � � a:� � I � e _ __ _ ./� � / RIM 81.40 � \ � � � L ; I � � � � �`. � v s-a � � � �i�,�m'= TO BE RE O�EN RIM BP.00 �J 6'INV OUT 81.65(N) ' \� � � \� � � � � � 10.0'UPLITT FSLI I I � Ex.6'TO BE IE 90.D6 SUNP 80.t5 � \ � � L I �: " I � i ps�uo I / `� PLUGGED AT CB / � � � � � . __.., . ��. i �.•ts � RIM 80.90 / ECi NEw 6'nB5 � \ � � � ' I I I '.. ...-...- ' �. j �� 's s-oaw � � /� 6'INV WT 80.15(E) / TO E%.6'PIPE / \ i \ \� � \\ � � L�, 'I „ SUMP 78.65 � i � I I i � � �� \ I � f.I.. ..r . I °- I I / / J I \ \ \ \ I . � �.. I ° I � � / � iozz•�`------ � � \ \ � � 3 ..:.I � � I I � I PROPOSEO BUILDING / � 0.°"' \I � �\ �\ �� ' . I I I EXISTING BUILDING I aiu easo I � I � / V \� � � \ ��, I .•os i m i �t� . cau�c �.x' I iE BtJS «.as'f I I / � / r � � .. .vo°Rnci ui'",roTM_� � ms.eu aca va� -------- - �-a��J l i l i�\ \` 1 1� 11 � I'. I I,' I II ' � `�.s.wrw.w�o s�.na� �i ' \ \ 1 ` I ' I i rt�o Karr i«ena .� - , ^L.m¢w � � \ 1 � �I �;�.� I �, .,� •., ' . x i � �.o:ooao I \ oN i�ir � 1 � �i� °o �....... ... • . ' E�.x'�aF¢�,w � t0 BE REMOVED ' \ 1 � I � +t' D � -... rrin vwr rc�nM • /: \ RIM 81.80 . 10'UiILiiY[$Mi....... .. ..... . ' . NT�Y i TI FiM B11• \•• �� L �� // ��M 30'�48 FIBERGLASS BASiN I � \ � `__ �E 82.00 � � , � � I I : I L1J� � . .. (2)1M 730V$EWAGE PUMP I i g� � ' � 1 ` � � � CouLD NODEL/wSt0�78N�(OR I � .n•r � � \ ( � 1 � _ � � . � z � J . EOUAL) I \ �nooso � _ — — — — — —.L — — � — — — —I— — � "-'. WER OLE �T � W 5 RHpABUS CON7ROL PANELS � � � \ � � I � \ ... � I � � �� i � \ 1 1 ! I !`I � ��E � �- ` Mooe� nz(a�can�) I � � e�ec. �� A '� icnr aae . I I !: I �... �-- IM1CLUDI G AiAriM AM1J NEAT�rERr'FvO� / � n �� ENCLO RE � �� TRANSFORNER PAO �� ' 1 ` � � � � I� ' � .�......._. ` ' ' . ... • � LIG/N POIE� �` / J ' / i:�: � - i.-._... ...� � EY. 0 � �. j �`\ i ' � , / , . � �� `,:� ' � Wi� ,. ...I - �----------------------- ---1 I -------�=------ —� ' �'/ ,' �'/ �� ,� /�� ;I � i , �,. _ _ � i � �' �' � � ,' � (� � ' ' _.__._.' ' � � I ewsnNC eui�NC i i �� ' ,' ,/ �' �, /� i i � i EXISTNG BVILDING I I i i / i � I I I \�� I � � Z ,. _.. - I I �� / �I f I Q I ' I� � I � �/` /� �/ � i�/ ��/ �/ I I I � I d I i , , � i � ,' ,' ,' , �i i : I ; � ' . { 1 � � � I I . � • , . I � '� ' � E7GSTINC BUILDING �I I... �\.. � � " , , �/ // I I : I � . , • ; � :�... ... _ .., J I . i�� i� � � � �•� � � I i ... .• - ___J� . " . / //// i � i I 'Ir g _ I . I , . i /' /� ' ' ^� 3 I 3 \ . LIGHT-VOLE ' � � 'I ? 3 # �{LIGHT POLE // I � , � N I . , � �� j / � �.I I � I v� , . � �.... -• ' . � ; � � ............. .. ,• . i � i I. . i i � ..... - a -...._ . � ' � N ......... -' . �. . Y-� . � i � . I ` � �� ~ I � ?. x i i � ��. � �V �5 , � m t „� V ' ....... . . .... �.. . , i 1 C Ql� ` W ....... . . .. i i � .... ._..._. . , = . . _..�... . .. . . . '� . � "� .. •� , . � � _ I � .. . � . 'I I� I ' . �/I I I d W Cn p rv . x �: . . �. �� . i W �. . . , � �� , �.._.. -- � ` . `--' i , . � � . , . � , I ......... • [�nsiwc v�uu win �� • . °� , • • . �. ._ ......, . , . ' ' __ ', ' '. �. . � WATER$ERy10E MID . � . , .._.. . • ._ ,. . .. ', �`, a , `4 I ._... .-�� , '� �: i ' , i . ... �.... , - DOUBLE CHECK ��LIGrIT POLE ��: � ' . . . . � q ....� . . B�CKFLOW PREKKTOR ' . . �� I I ' o ,_.,. '... , .. ��. _ I ..... . . _ _ '_ — _ — — — — '- _ — _ — — — — — . _ —. I � ��_.. . ` , a � - � i — _ — — — _ — ` � - �..... —• _ � — — . �. .. � . . � ' � . . � , , ' � � � � I I � � � � , � � w ° � � �, � E)(ISTiNG STREET LIC11T�� " i I I � p o �" SW CANTERE3URY LANE � � E%.SANITARY,-� --- .. 5.00 . � ♦t00 . �i00- . 2�00'-�. �1+00 0+00.°o y Ez.��Tr w - � - - � _ - r_ _ _ _' _ - _ . �_ _� - - :f.y_ - .- T� - I i° I E E%. 10'PRESSURE W . � E%.�11�9RMlT . . ' . •, t. c •. � ' i I . I - — — — — -... _ — — — — — — _ _ _ � I �� i 1361.001 /...\ a. (< � - — �� u� 2 J _ �� 1_J sHEEt Nau.E aF`nSinN � �� - ..�, �� SITE - EX. INLE i 90' BEND IE 79.55 EX. 10" STORM DRAIN _. \ � — � � — — — — � ~ � - EX. OUTFALL � � � _ � �IE�79.50 � � � J — — � _ �� TO B� �B.�NDONED \ � HYDRANT AS�EivtBLY / � �� — — — � � � � � � - - - - - -- ' /�� / � — / �— — — — — � � 'SLOPED PORTION �RAMP. I CA BASIN C.O. 3 NEW 4" TH�I ATURAL CONCRETE I I EX. 6" PVC I TRJ BE INSTALLED AT RIM 82.00 SLAB (BR00M FINISH), POUR LEVEL L=93.90' 6" ABS � W POINT, FIELD � IE 80.15 WITH Tf�P OF EX. CURB AND MATCH I I S=0 004D 4" DS LEAD L=110.54' 4" DS LEAD / ERIFY ELEV. s�or OF RAMP. L=2.25' 5=0.0050 �-2.z5 � RIM 81.50 f RNISH/INSTALL �(CLR-7-SF-P BIK� I 5=0.0050 5=0.00SfY /RACK BY MADRAX CORP. FASTEN T4 � IE 80.23 SLAB PER MANUFACTURER'S SPECS I EX. CO AvAi� RIM R3.05 / NW PLAYGROUND (50 - 523 I I a ,�/ IE 79.77 ,,, / / 6" ABS 4�� DS LEAD —` � '�'�`� / J � � j�� L=3J5' 5=0.0050 6" A9S EX. LICiHT POLE � \ S=0 0050 I�ELOCATE EX. �=�2s�' � _ �IGHT POLE / s=o�oso Ex. 6" PVC � �—� L-4.53' / � � v� �O 5=0.362(y / � I � �o° / / � X�B 3 I � � 0P EX. CB 2 / C.O. S / � RIM 82.40 I I � � �,P TO BE REMOVE� RIM 8)_.0a � � 6" INV OUT 81.65 (N) � � o EX. 6" TO BE IE 80.06 SUMP 80.15 / � PLUGGED AT CB / I RIM 80.90 / / ONNECT NEW 6" ABS � I �/ 6" INV OUT 80.15 (E) / TO EX. 6" PIPE � / SUMP 78.65 � / � � J i � � � ' � � ~ � � e � _ � � o I � � � / �=�zss•� � _ - - - - � � i / PROPOSED BUILDING // � s=o.ozsz � Q � � � � � �4" DS LEADI I � / F— L=425'� � � � v7 5=0.00�0 � � � �/ � �/ � 4" DS LEAL � L=5.69' EX. CB 1 � �o.00so TO BE REMOVED a C.O. 5 y � °�"„� � � ° RIM 84.80 � � °� "�m.� ' RIM 81.45 � � \ ° < , ,� c c a� =w �. W � IE 82.00 � � ' � IE 8a.85 � — _ _ i m Q1 � =o - aw �n o � ' 4" DS L�SAD � f � L=37.43' \ \ � � � % � 5=0.0050 \ — —�- — / — a > � � � � � � � � � V ° ° o � `� � \ / " � a i � � ELEC. \ � � \ J � a o � TRANSFORMER PAD � � � � ° ° \ LIGI�T POLE � --- -— � �� 1 � E �� , � -�- � I � , , , .� / , i 1361.001 �" IIr�� ' L'� a� 2 - � 11,) ` - --� SHEET NAME�. REVi$_ON � ��,�, _ �� 51TE 9/21/2006 Conditions Associated With 3:24:1 1 PM �ACCEL/7 Case #: CUP2006-00002 Condition Status Updated Code Title Hold Status Changed By Tag Date By 0001 BICYCLF. RACK None Met GAE 9'1 I'?006 EAE 1. Prior to building permits,the applicant shall provide a 6-stall bicycle rack in addition to the existin�� onsite bicycle rack that is not within parking aisles, required landscaping or pedestrian ways. A revised plan will be required showing the location and specific design and location of the required bicycle rack in accordance with standards in Section 18.765.OSO.A through D of the code. 0002 NOISE CODE None Met EAE 9/l I/2006 EAE 2. Prior to building permits,the applicant is hereby notified that activities on the site are subject to the noise limitations of Article IV of Section 7.40 of the Tigard Municipal Code. The applicant shall certify that the proposed use will not generate noise in excess of the standards specified in this section of the Tigard Municipal Code. 0003 SIGN PERMIT None NOT MET EAE 9/13/2006 EAE 3. The applicant shall obtain a sign permit prior to erecting a sign on the site. The subject sign shall comply with the sign code(Chapter 17.780). 0004 REVISED FLOOR PLAN None NOT MET BSB 9/13/2006 EAE 4. The applicant is required to obtain a building permit for the change of use/occupancy. Prior to receiving a building permit,the applicant shall submit a revised interior floor plan that shows which rooms will be used as classrooms. 0005 ADDRESSING FEE None Met EAE 9/13/2006 EAE 5. Prior to issuance of a building permit,the applicant shall pay the addressing fee if using an address other than the existing address of the proposed site. Note: Not using a different address. EAE. 0006 TRIM TREES/BUSHES None NOT MET KSM 9/13/2006 EAE 6. Prior to final building inspection,the applicant shall trim the trees and bushes specified in the Traffic Analysis report in order to improve sight distance. 0007 FINAL SIGHT DISTANCE None NOT MET KSM 9/13/2006 EAE 7. Prior to final building inspection,the applicant's engineer shall submit final sight distance certification for the three access points. Page 1 of 1 CaseConditions..rpt . . �-t c c��-( . i � CTS Augusi 24, 2006 Prvj�e�ct: Tiyaid MITCH School,OR06.062.T01 rnqineel5 Ms. Kim McMillan City of Tigard 13125 SW Hall Boulevard Tigard, OR 97223 S�jec,t: Sfght Destance at Propo�ed MJTr7-15U►ool at SW 103`d Av�u�e�SW Canterbury Lane- (�RTIFIG4TION LETIFR Dear Ms. McMillan: I have conducted a study of available sight distance along SW 103rd Avenue and SW Canterbury Lane at the entrances to the existing churth that will provide the primary site access for the proposed M1TCH School (one on SW 103`� and one on SW Canterbury). 1'he City's sight distance standards are listed in the Traffic Impact Study (TIS) Requireme�rts. The TIS requirements call for minimum sight distance equal to 10 times the posted speed from driver's eye height of 3.5 feet to an object height of 4.25 Feet, measured 15 feet back from the extended curb line or edge of pavement. The following summarizes the available sight distanoe after the tree branches on SW 103'�Avenue were trimmed. SW 103`°Avenue has a posted speed of 35 mph and requires 350 feet of sight distance. No posted speed was observed o� SW Canterbury Lane, which has speed humps past the school site frontage. As a residential street, the posted speed was assumed to be 25 mph, which would then require 250 feet of clear sight distance. Sight distances measured in the field the week of August 25, 2006 are as foltows: 1. Westemmost Canterbury Lane drivew�y (stafF�rkinQ entrance) Sight distance (SD) to the east exceeds 250 feet. SD to the west is limited to 190 feet. However, this access is unlikely to be used by school staff because while sd�ool is in session there will be pienty of parking accessible via the main entrances. Drivers are unlikely to use the secondary access and around the back of the site when direct access is available. In order to provide 250 feet of SD, the City would need to require the adjacent property owner to trim the bush at the base of a tree along the side of SW Canterbury Lane (photo �2). 2. Main Canterbury lane driveway SD to the east is dear back to the intersection with SW 103rd Avenue (about 190 feet), where Canterbury ends (photo #3). SD to the west exceeds 250 feet, measured 10 feet back from the edge of curb (photo A�4). Measurement 10 feet back firom the edge of curb meets minimum AASHTO intersection sight distance standards. (Unless noted, all measurements were taken 15 feet back from the edge of pavement/edge of curb). 3. 103`�Avenue drivewa �::ca:n��ti'Tanascource�-,�e Y - sooro,OR s7�2a SD to the north exceeds 350 feet measured f�om 15 feet back from the edge of P SG3690.8080 pavement (photo �5), WhICh m�t5 Clty StBfldafd5. F503.6455930 E hinsboro�cuengineers.com SD to the south aiso exceeds 350 feet measured from 15 feet back from the N"^"�se^g"'eers.com edge of pavement (photo #6), which meets City standards. The applicant trimmed tree branches on tfie street trees south of the driveway. - :.,�,� �a :„et wn ,::�.e.w� Cceur d'Alene,�_ Sacramenta.� . ��pr1T1pR!f�. " www parat�i om�ar.y cnm i k i E' ,-"-- ��. .,.. -; . - -.- �_ -_..___ - August�4, 200b I� conciusion, I hereby certify that the intersection sight distance at the access points for the MITCH School conforms to rhe City of Tigard sight distance requirements. Sincerely, ' 1 4Ep PROFFS ��'�NGINEF,4 si�2 Howard Roll, P.E. Q' 16 40PE Senior Transportation Pianner Attachments ,., �, E N „ py ,9y'8 t9g POv c: Debi Lorence, MITCH Charter School '� ,�d Murphy, LDC Design Gr�up �OWAR� EXPIRATION DATE: (1' � . �'�t 1 i� i . � . . �11TCN �cho�,l .��..... �� ;n�. T� - -3 ��_ . . v� "�y � � �, _ �� _ �. � I r ��y�K� ..T"��1.. ��' '6�' " `� „ fi . f -`�►._ " r.-�.•-�- . -' ,�.�' ��'4 - w� +"< - 'rC�'X":'�'� .. _ �, -.a.a "dt� Q t .�;:k-y��<<�. � ,�:: } � ' !'.•r,N � s''.° -_r : �� - .TiTi .- �+' ".'W' � �' 7.�'�!. ��`►' '''., � �'� t�.J� �� tr��+ ��,�"`a:�:�y t �� ''� .� f� ��.� ��y►rQ�+MJL.r ti��" �+ T�s� S _ s^�'_ _ =1: V�ew EAST along Canterbury Lane fror� .�.es*.e�., � 'e _, :,_�� '. -- '.o cone) �� Iw �� , � --- - - `� _ �:� - • -- - ... �.�� . , ., �, � � �... �� ,�„, ,� , , ..,�..,y�►c' � - �4e.. �,�'" ,:,;'4,�, ��. . �'#�.-` ._t YR .. �2: View WEST along Canterbury Lane from westem s�te access, which �s unl�kely to be used (190 feet SD a�.a�!,ab!e; 250 feet would -e��, -e `nmr,mq ve eta��o�� - : acent parcel) - �¥��'�.�. , +': ;� ,� :..y� a� � -,r - 'f ..�: ° --_ � - _ '� \ , , :;.��.� �� .'.�� #3: View to EAST along Canterbury from main entrance (clear[o SW 103rd Ave) PhotoS Teken 6y C7S Errgineers,Page 1 �11 Ul :�Rf_.1 T1 f'it .�L. �It �t� MITCH Schooi Ac�esc Puints T � �l� ��.y1�'... �s ` �'��.• ys � � •. �- � -_ i � _�� I ..�V T .. -..'_ . -..__ �... .. _,. � ... � i. . ♦ .. �. =4: V�ew to �^�EST along Canterbury from main entry (> 250 R�10'from edge of pavement) . �, , x� � � � � _ .r�'��'' � � k - �� "`-c, �!• , _.. __�.w�ewP--+'" � .. ` =5� View to NORTH along 103'� (360 ft to flag, 15'from edge of pavement) � __ -. �`;#." ,L v _ ,;.. .� ' ." � . J '�.. s f�:��5 t�. ' •► � � :�: � � K,� �: S r iS. � P' /'.ei r�'I�Y'v� zr�-�.�r{;. �rf�-��'t� Y. �., *4 F 'c. . . -^ «Y�'��,`4r�:`..<'" ';.ai;x��• �..�w_. a�.a:-r'i :�t__._;�•i�uz.�i:��w:a�t�v�a+.�� x_:�_�a #6: View to SOUTH along 103rd (360 R to cone, 15'edge of pavement) Photas Taken by CTS Engineers.Page 2 1 i � .. � a CITY OF TIGARD �REGON October 13, 2006 M.I.T.C.H. Charter School P.O. Box 230575 Portland, OR 97281 Attn: Debi Lorence Re: Permit No. CUP2006-00002 Dear Ms. Lorence: The City of Tigard has processed a refund for deposit of fees on the above referenced permit for the following: Site Address: 10445 SW Canterbury Ln. Project Name: M.I.T.C.H. Charter School Job No.: N/A Refund: Check#47914 in the amount of$1,500.00. Credit card"return"receipt in the amount of$N/A. Notes: Refund 100% of security deposit for bicycle rack installation. If you have any questions please contact me at(503) 718-2430. Sincerely, /,�(��"�filc�-�-� Dianna Howse Permit Specialist Enc. i:\Building\Refunds\LtrRefund-Deposit.doc 07/04 13125 SW Hall Blvd., Tigard, OR 97223(503)639-4171 TDD(503)684-2772 r . '� City of Tigard - , , � Tidemark Refund Request This form is used for refund requests of land use, engineering and building application fees paid by all methods. Receipts, documentation and the Regue.rt for PermitAction or Refund form (if applicable) must be attached to this form. Refund requests are due to Tidemark System Administrator by Friday at 5:00 PM for processing each Monday. Accounts Payable will route refund checks to Tidemark System Administrator for distribution. Please allow 1-2 weeks for processing. PAYABLE TO: MITCH Charter School DATE: 10/3/06 P.O. Box 230575 Portland, OR 97281 REQUESTED BY: Dianna Howse Attn: Debi Lorence Erruly TRANSACTION INFORMATION: Receipt#: 2006-4392 Case#: CUP2006-00002 Date: 9/6/06 Address/Parcel: 1044�SW Canterbury Ln. Pay Method: Check Ptoject Name: MITCH Charter School EXPLANATION: Refund 100%of security deposit for bicycle rack installation. REFUND INFORMATION: Fee Description From Receipt Revenue Account No. Refund Exam le: UILD Permit Fee Exam le: 245-0000-432000 $Amount EPOS Customcr De osit 100-0000-229000 $1,500.00 TOTAL REFUND: $1,500.00 APPROVALS: If under�500 Professional Staff If under$5,000 Division Manager 1 If under�22,500 Department Manager If under$50,000 Ciry 1�lanager If over$50,000 Local Contract Review Board FOR TIDEMARK SYSTEM ADMINISTRATION USE ONLY �'{ Case Refund Processed: Date: /� � r : B•: ' � . �; - I:\Building\Refunds\RefundRequest.doc 09/15/06 cITY or TIGARD 9i6i2oos� � -'� 13125 SW Hall Blvd. 8:47:15AM� Tigard,Oregon 97223 � � (503)639-4171 � �, Receipt #: 27200600000000004392 ,� � Date: 09/06/2006 �' Line Items: �� Case No Tran Code Descrtption Revenue Account No Amount Paid CUP2006-00002 [DEPOSJ CustomerDeposit 100-0000-229000 1,500.00 Z,ine Item Total: $1,SOO.OQ Payments: Method Payer User m Acct./Check No. Approval No. x How Received Amount Paid ��, Check M.I.T.C.I�. CF-IARTER SCHOOL kjp . 1110 In Person 1,500.00 , Payment Total: $1,500.00 . ,�1. �) � � � � - �) � M. I.T. C.H.CHARTER SCHOOL PO BOX 230575 1110 � (� PORTLAND,OR 9T281 98-8/�232 �— � q—�--oc� _ ��. �ete ` .U� ~ '3" Paiy b�the �. �' � o�of � � ��5� � 8 � .c� ►c�u �— ..�.,� � ...�W.. �, Dollars t :x°..• T1gud 8ranch � � 1-800-895-33i5 .•��••• wcb.com WE3T COA6T BANK Receipt.rpt �3 i 1C.�r�c� ' � � r • U : Community Development , � Request for Permit Action or Refund TO: CITY OF TIGARD Permit System Administtator 13125 SW Hall Blvd.,Tigard, OR 97223 Phone: 503.718.2430 Fax: 503.598.1960 www.tigard-or.gov FROM: ❑ Owner ❑ Applicant ❑ Contractor � City Staff (check one) REFUND TO: Name: / .N�•� ,i. C -��. �.G��t c f .s �i:��:., � (BusinessorIndividual)��Y!• ��'6� (,.�'�GIt.L�° Mailing Address: �� t� u � 'a �D 5� � City/State/Zip: �� (-}{�,,�,�{ (� q �� a � i Phone No.: �� 'S.� t3( Z(�, -- � �c((p PLEASE TAKE ACTION FOR THE ITEM(S) CHECKED (✓): ❑ CANCEL PERMIT APPLICATION. � REFUND PERMIT FEES (attach receipt,if available). ❑ REMOVE CONTRACTOR FROM PERMIT (do not cancel permit). Permit #: C �P'2�c�c�(� - of�,c �;1 Site Address or Parcel#: � �`'��-{ � �V.� �-C�_�t,r��u �� Project Name: i/V( . 1 .l.0(.-�• �1��l�e r sc.k o a l C v�n-�h vha.i (�.5� �°fw�i t Subdivision Name: N �'c Lot#: EXPLANATI ON: �'(s c�� re (-i.�c w� r�F S c�c u�,'�y ��s � �' -�r ,� i �Y�l e I'tt�. �1'�s �tc l��:�fi'cz.. • Sc�h u ,rc(.�- ��s ��'-ln �' �,�'t�c f�� f S.e c vY i�-�r k.!' �t u ��-v�Q -r k-e e�L�e d ; Signature: ��,. �� Date: � � 1 � 1 ��=' � --� Print Name: t vr�i�y- �� Refund Policv 1. The Director may suthorize the refund of: a) any fee which was erroneously paid or collected. b) not more than 80 percent of the application fee when an application is withdrawn or canceled before any review effort has been expended. 2. Refunds will be returned to the original Payer in the same method in which payment was received. • ' • • Rte to Sys Adtnin: Date By Rte to Bl Admin: Date B Refund Processed: Date B Invoice Processed: Date B Pemut Cauceled: Date B Parcel Ta Added: Date B Recei t#C'(-;'%��'.• Date ; � > 1bSethod '��. Amount$ I:\Cirywide\Tidemazk\Forms\ReyPermi ction-Ping.doc Rev OS/24/OG E"`'. jw � �� November 6, 2006 , . � : Ms. Kim McMillan RECEIVED PLANNING >- ':;�;E� 5��<�" Development Review Engineer N�V 0 City of Tigazd 7 2006 : 13125 SW Hall Blvd. C�� F T�GAR� Multi-sensory Instruction Tigard, OR 97223 Teaching Children Honds-on RE• Sight Distance MITCH Charter School-CUP 2006-00002 The mission of M.I.T.C.H. is to use commonly sharnd knowledge to build the Dear Kim: foundation for education where aN studenrs leam the �s letter addresses the coordination with the adjacent property owner . critical elemenis of reodrng, regazding sight distance at the westem(secondary)driveway. writing and thinking skilfs. These educationol concepts 'I'he Tigazd Land Use Hearings Officer,Joe Tuner,approved the MITCH ore bosed upon the Charter School Conditionai Use Permit application,with conditions, on Core Knowledge Sequence August 23`d, 20Q6. Condition#7 required the applicant to trim the trees and curriculum obtoined from bushes specified in the Traffic Analysis report in order to improve sight grade-by-grode sequence distance. Condition#8 required the applicant's engineer to submit final of specifc content in all sight distance certification for the three access points. The applicant'S �ore o�odem�a- engineer(CTS Engineers)reviewed the sight distance and provided a final leorning burlds upon leorning. Slg�lt(�1S�riCe CeI't1f1Cat10II 18tL6T t0 tlle Clly,dated August 24, 2006. In that letter,the ir�c engineer stated that the west driveway access onto Teaching to the Canterbury Lane is unlikely to be used by the school staf� It further stated whole child; that"in order to provide 250 feet of sight distance,"...the City would need raising the bar of to require the adjacent property owner to trim the bush at the base of a tree educational expectations. 11011g the Side of SW C1i1tel'biliy Lane" In that letter,Howard Roll,P.E. • and Senior Transportation Planner,certified"...that the intersection sight Grades K-8 dista,nce at the access points for the MITCH School conforms to the City of • Tigazd sight distance requirements." Core Knowledge School • In an e-mail to Ed Murphy dated September 15,2006,Emily Eng wrote: Riggs Language Arts "Kim has reviewed the final sight distance certification for MITCH and • has found that it does not meet sight distance at the westem most driveway Saxon Math on Canterbury. The engineer says "In order to provide 250 feet of sight distance,the City would need to require the adjacent property owner to trim the bush at the base of a tree along the side of SW Canterbury Lane". 503-639-5757 'I'be applicant needs to coordinate that with the adjacent properiy owner, not the City. As soon as the bush is trimmed we can sign off this condition." In a subsequent e-mail on the same day,Emily wrote"While this driveway may not be typically used by the school,it is part of the whole site, which was the subject of the CUP decision, and is PO Box 230575 still accessible to users of the MITCH school." Tigard,OR 9728 I-0575 wwav.mitchcharterschool.org mitch@mitchcharterschool.org • 1 MITCH Charter School has followed up on the concerns identified in the Traffic Study Report and the related conditions of approval. Although the MITCH School does not use this driveway, we have pursued the City concerns that the sight distance is not adequate at this location. It should be noted that the Calvin Presbyterian Church does not own this property. T'he bush suggested for trimming belongs to the neighbor who owns the property to the west on Canterbury Lane. MITCH Charter School and Calvin Presbyterian Church met with the neighbor owning the properiy on November 3, 2006. The results of that meeting are as follows: 1. Parties—Eleanor Fisher Stapleton and husband Bud, Property Owner (10505 SW Canterbury Lane, 503/639-3589) Judy Miller, Youth Ministries Elder at Calvin Presbyterian Church Lee Weislogel, MITCH Charter School Board Chair 2. After introductions, Lee Weislogel discussed the City process for obtaining approval for the � MITCH School to operate at Calvin Church. This was followed by presenting the specific sight distance concern cited by the City as detailed in the Traffic Analysis of August 2, 2Q06(Exhibit 13 to Applicant's Statement for"MITCH Charter School"). 3. Points included safety, sight distance calculations,other sight distance areas surrounding the church property, and options available. 4. The property owner noted these points and expressed their desire to maintain the visual and sound bufFer that the hedge in its existing form provides. They mentioned that they had recendy trimmed the hedge and that the expense of trimming or any replacement could be significant. 5. Conclusion—The neighbors do not see a problem with the hedge in its current configuration and have declined to trim the hedge. They believe it is safe enough for the very few trips involved. The Church agrees with this assessment for its congregation from its own neazby driveway. MITCH Charter School is not directly involved since, as stated previously,the school does not use this driveway. It was good for the three groups to discuss this subject and it has increased awaaeness and improved communication among the parties. MITCH Charter School considers that it has done all it can to satisfy the City's requirements and believes it has fully dischazged its responsibilities in this matter. We therefore respectfully request that the City stafF sign off on Condition#7. Let us know should you desire more information. Sincerel Lee D. Weislogel Chair, MITCH Boazd of Directors Cc: Ms. Emily Eng, Assistant Planner Community Development—Planning Division City of Tigard 2 City of 7'igard, Oregon • 13125 S�Hall Blvd. • Tigard, OR 97223 November 13, 2006 ,- ,� `� --�• � i � � �-- ' � Lee Weislogel " � , � � M.I.T.C.H. Charter School PO Box 230575 Tigard, OR 97281-0575 RE: Violarion of Conditions of Approval for CUP2006-00002 Dear Lee: The Ciry has xeceived your letter concerning Conditions of Approval#6 and #7 of land use decision CUP2006-00002, approved with condirions by Hearings Officer Joe Turner on August 23,2006. Condirion #6 states that prior to the final building inspection, the applicant shall trim the trees and bushes specified in the Traffic Analysis report in order to unprove sight distance. Condition #7 states that pxior to the final building inspection, the applicant's engineer shall submit final sight distance certification for the three access points. In your letter,received on November 7, 2006, you request that the City sign off on these conditions despite not having met them. Reasons cited for not meeting the required 250 feet of sight distance from the westernmost driveway are as follows: 1) the school does not use this driveway; 2) the neighbors wish to maintain the visual and sound buffer that the hedge provides; and 3) the cost of trimming and replacing the hedge could be a burden for the neighbors. The City cannot sign off on Conditions #6 and#7 until they are met. That individuals "do not see a problem with the hedge" does not override the City's standards and the applicant's engineer's conclusion that the westernmost driveway does not meet the required 250 feet of sight distance. Not satisfying conditions of approval is a violation of the land use decision, and therefore, the development code. We are notifying you that a warning tag has been attached to the subject parcel that will prevent any future modifications of the site unless Condirions of Approval #6 and #7 of CUP2006-00002 are sarisfied. The time for consideration of Conditions #6 and #7 was at the public hearing. Sincerely, c%�"� � Emily ng � Assistant Planner Copy: T'om Coffee,City of Tigard Dick BewersdorEf,City of Tigard Kim VIc;�Iillan,City of Tigard Judy:�Iiller,Calvin Presbyterian Church Phone: 503.639.4171 . Fax: 503.684.7297 . www.tigard-or.gov . TTY Relay: 503.684.2772 City of Tigard, Orega,� • 13125 SWHaII Blvd. • Tigard, OR 97223 �� : Apri15, 2007 ' � � M.I.T.C.H. Charter School Debi Lorence PO Box 230575 Portland, OR 97281 RE: PROJECT STATUS UPDATE File No.: CUP2006-00002 Dear Ms. Lorence: I am the project coordinator for land use cases at the City of Tigard. At this time I am sending out Pxoject updates that list the Conditions with the notarions of whethet or not they have been met. It appears that you have not yet obtained a building permit for this project. As you know the issuance of a building pernut is a necessary step. The final inspection and right to occupy should take place prior to your conductir�business as a school at the Calvin Presbyterian Church. If you do have information to submit to meet any of the conditions please remember to submit them to the city with a cover sheet stating which condition it applies to. Thank you and good luck with your project, �_jl�Q�� G� Maris Buxton Project Coordinator V: 503-718-2453 F: 503-624-3681 maris,v,,ti�ard-or.gov enclosure Phone: 503.639.4171 . Fax: 503.684.7297 . www.tigard-or.gov . TTY Relay: 503.684.2772