The URL can be used to link to this page

CUP2007-00003 � �?0 D�`.YS =2/29/2008 DAfE OF FILING: 12/19/200, ., DATE MAILED: 12/20/2007 = CITY OF TIGARD Washington County, Oregon N�TICE OF FINAL ORDER BY THE HEARINGS OFFICER Case Numbers: CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT CUP 2007-00003 SENSITIVE LANDS REVIEW SLR 2007-00004 AD USTME NT VAR 2007-000 6 SI N PERMIT SGN 2007-00171 Case Name: TUALATIN VALLEY FIRE &RESCUE WALNUT STATION 50 Applicant's Name/Address: Tualatin Valle Fire &Rescue 20665 SW Blanton Street Aloha Ore on 97007 Ovvner's Name/Address: Same as a licant Address of Property: 12585 S ut Street Ti ard Ore on 97224 Tax Ma /Lot Nos.: Washin on Co. Tax Assessor's Ma No.2S104AD,Tax Lot 4500. A FINAL ORDER INCORPORATING TI-� FACTS, FINDINGS AND GONQ,USIONS APPROVING A REOUEST FOR A CONDITTONAL IJSE, SENSITIVE LANDS REVIEW AN ADJUST'MENT AND A SIGN PERMIT. THE QTY OF TIGARD HEARINGS OFFIC�R HAS REVIEWED Tf-�E APPLICANT'S PLANS,NARRATTVE,MATERIALS,COM1vIENTS OF REVIEWING AGENQES, THE PLANI�TING DIVISIONS STAFF REPORT AND RECOMIvIENDAT'IONS FOR THE APPLICATION DESCRIBED IN FURTT�R DETAIL IN Tf-�E STAFF REPORT. Tf-� HEARINGS OFFIC�R HELD A PUBLIC HEARING ON DECEMBER 17, 2007 TO RECEIVE TES7TMONY REGARDING T�IIS APPLICATTON. THIS DEQSION HAS BEEN BASED ON T� FACTS,FINDINGS AND CONQ,LJSIONS CO?vTAINED V��T�IIN`I'�IIS FI?�TAL ORDER Suminary: ➢ Conditional Use Permit ap proval for a fire station that will include an apparatus bay for three fire engines, staff dorrrutones, locker rooms, kitchen, duung and day room, offices exercise room and storage. The fire station will also provide a 767 square foot commuruty room that will be availa�le for public use. The applicant will provide off-street parkuig for station staff, the communiry room and the adjacent park The a�licant also received 5ensitive Lands Review a proval for construction of stormwater facilities within t11e Krue er eek buffer area, an Adjustment to reduce thepdriveway spacing requirements along a collector from 200 feet to�5 feet and a Sign Pernut for a double-faced freestanding s�gn. At the December 17, 2007 public hearing, the Hearings Ofticer approved this request, subject to conditions of approval contained within this final order. Zone: R 4.5: Low Densiry Residential District. A licable Review Csiteria: Communi Development Code Chapters 18.330, 18.360, 18390, 18.510, 18.705, 18.725, 18.74 , 18,765, 18.775, 18.780, 18.790, 18.79�and 18.$10. Action: ➢ ❑ Approval as Requested O Approval with Conditions ❑ Denial Notice: Notice was published in the newspaper and mailed to: ❑X Owners of Record within the Required Distance ❑x Affected Government Agencies O Interested Parties � The Applicanu and Owners The adopted findings of fact and decision can be obtained from the Plaruiing Division/Community Development Department at the C:ity of Tigard Pernzit Center at City Hall. Final Decision: THIS DECISION IS FINAL ON DECEMBER 20,2007 AND BECOMES EFFECTIVE ON ANUARY 8, 2008 LJNLESS AN APPEAL IS FILED. peal: e decision of the Review Authority is final for purposes of appeal on the date that it is mailed. Any party with standing�as provided in Section 18.390.040.G.1. may appeal this decision ul accordance with Section 18.39D.040.G.2. of the Tigard Community Developm� ent Code which provides that a written appeal together with the re quired fee shall be f�1ed with the Director within ten (10) business days of the date the notice of the decision was ma�led. The appeal fee schedule and forms are available from the Planning Division of Tigard City Hall, 13125 SW Hall Soulevard, Tigard, Oregon 97223. THE DEADLINE FOR FILING AN APPEAL IS 5:00 PM ON ANUARY 7, 2008. Questions: If you have any questions, please call the Ciry of Ti�ard Plannin�Division at (503) 639-4171. BEFORE THE LAND USE HEARINGS OFFICER FOR THE CITY OF TIGARD, OREGON Regarding an application by Tualatin Valley Fire & Rescue) F I 1�' A L O R D E R for a conditional use permit and sensitive lands review ) to construct and operate an 11,882 square foot fire station ) CUP2007-00003 at 12585 SW Walnut Street in the City of Tigard, Oregon )(TVF&R Walnut Station) A. SUMMARY L Gary Wells filed the application for Tualatin Valley Fire & Rescue ("TVF&R" or the "applicant"). The applicant requests approval of a conditional use permit to construct and operate an 11,882 square foot fire station at 12585 SW Walnut Street; also known as tax lot 4500 WCTM 2S 104AD (the "site"). The fire station will include an apparatus bay for three fire engines, staff dorniitories, locker rooms, kitchen, dining and day room, offices, exercise room and storage. The fire station will also provide a 767 square foot community room that will be available for public use. The applicant will provide off-street parking for station staff, the community room and the adjacent park. The applicant also requests sensitive lands review for construction of stormwater facilities within the Krueger Creek buffer area, an adjustment to reduce the driveway spacing requirements along a collector from 200 feet to 25 feet and a sign permit for a double-faced freestanding sign. Additional basic facts about the site and surrounding land and applicable approval standards are provided in the Staff Report to the Hearings Officer dated December 10, 2007 (the " Staff Report"), incorporated herein by reference. 2. Tigard Hearings Officer Joe Turner (the "hearings officer") conducted a duly noticed public hearing to receive testimony and evidence in the matter. At the public hearing, City staff recommended conditional approval of the application. Representatives of the applicant testified in support of the application. One person testified orally in support of the application. One person testified orally with questions and concerns. Other persons testified in writing. Disputed issues in this case include: a. Whether the proposed development complies with CWS buffer requirements for streams and wetlands; b. Whether the City can require a larger stream buffer to protect water quality and wildlife habitat; and c. Whether the development provides an adequate number of off-street parking spaces. 3. The hearings officer concludes that the applicant sustained the burden of proof for a conditional use permit based on the findings and conclusions included and incorporated herein and subject to conditions at the end of this final order. I B. HEARING AND RECORD 1. The hearings officer held a duly noticed public hearing on December 17, 2007 to receive and consider public testimony in this matter. The record includes a witness list, materials in the casefile as of the close of the record, including materials submitted after the hearing, and an audio record of the hearing. At the beginning of the hearing, the hearings officer made the declaration required by ORS 197.763. The hearings officer disclaimed any ex parte contacts, bias ar conflicts of interest. The following is a summary by the hearings officer of selected relevant testimony offered at the hearing. 2. City planner Cheryl Caines summarized the Staff Report. a. She noted that the City received a written comment from Verizon Communications stating that phone service is available to the site. b. The City also received a letter from Sue Beilke, director of the Biodiversity Project of Tigard and vice-president of Friends of Summer Creek. Ms. Beilke argued that the proposed 50-foot stream buffer should be measured from the edge of the wetland associated with the stream, based on CWS regulations. Ms. Beilke further argued that the 50-foot buffer is inadequate to protect water quality and wildlife. The buffer should be increased to a minimum 200 feet. Ms. Caines noted that CWS issued a service provider letter approving the proposed buffer. The City has no authority to require a larger vegetated corridor or otherwise apply CWS's regulations in this proceeding. c. She noted that the applicant submitted a supplemental sight distance analysis dated November 29, 2007. d. In response to Ms. Cameron's testimony, she testified that the stream setback requirements are determined by CWS. The applicant proposed to remove two trees on the site, but all of the trees near the stream will remain. The parking requirements are based on the size of the facility and the meeting room. 3. City engineer Kim McMillan testified that CWS issued a service provider letter accepting the 50-foot buffer proposed by the applicant. The applicant must obtain formal approval from CWS before the City will issue building permits for the fire station. She opined that traffic generated by the proposed facility will be imperceptible to surrounding residents. 4. Planner Frank Angelo and TVF&R Division Chief Gary Wells testified for the applicant. a. Mr. Angelo accepted the findings and conditions in the Staff Report with one exception outlined in his December 17, 2007 letter. He noted that there are no overhead utility lines along the site's Walnut Street frontage. Therefore condition of approval 28 should be deleted. He testified that many fire stations provide community rooms. The 767 square foot community meeting room proposed on this site will accommodate a maximum of roughly 20 CUP2007-00003/SLR2007-00004/VAR2007-00036/SGN2007-00171 Hearings OJficer Final Order (TVF&R Walnut Station) Page 2 people. The Fire District can control the use of the room. He waived the applicant's right to submit a final written argument. b. Mr. Wells testified that the site is located in an area that is currently underserved by TVF&R. Response times in the area range from ten to twelve minutes, compared to six minute average response times in the remainder of TVF&R's service area. The proposed fire station is expected to reduce response times in the area to six minutes or less, consistent with the remainder of TVF&R's service area. 5. Mark Padgett, president of the Quail Hollows homeowners association testified in support of the application. He argued that the proposed fre station will increase public health, safety and welfare. 6. llonna Cameron questioned whether the facility provides sufficient parking to accommodate the proposed community room and the adjacent park. She questioned whether the facility will be setback away from the stream and associated wetlands. The "swampy areas" extend some distance away from the stream. She questioned whether the applicant will remove trees near the stream. 7. At the end of the hearing, the hearings officer closed the public record and announced his intention to approve the application subject generally to recommended conditions in the Staff Report. C. DISCUSSION 1. The Staff Report identifies the applicable approval criteria for the application and applies them to the record in the case. The hearings officer agrees that the standards identified in the Staff Report are applicable and finds that they are correctly applied to the facts of the case in the Staff Report. Substantial evidence in the record shows that the proposed use does or can comply with the applicable approval criteria for a CUP, and adoption of recommended conditions of approval as amended will ensure final plans are submitted and implemented as approved consistent with those criteria and standards and will prevent, reduce or mitigate potential adverse impacts of the development consistent with the requirements of the TMC. The hearings officer adopts the findings and conclusions in the Staff Report, as modified, as his own. 2. The photographs attached to Mr. Angelo's December 17, 2007 letter demonstrate that there are no overhead utility lines along the site's Walnut Street frontage. Therefore condition of approval should be deleted. 3. Ms. Beilke argued that the stream buffer should be measured from the edge of the wetland, rather than from the stream, based on CWS regulations. However the hearings officer has no authority to construe or apply CWS's regulations. The hearings officer finds that the proposed buffer is sufficient to comply with CWS's regulations based on the CWS service provider letter CWS approved site plan. Exhibit B of the application. There is no substantial evidence to the contrary. If Ms. Beilke disagrees with CWS's determination she can appeal it consistent with CWS's regulations. CUP2007-00003/SLR2007-00004/VAR2007-00036/SGN2007-00171 Hearings Officer Final Order (TVF&R Walnut Station) Page 3 r ' , � . a. The hearings officer has no authariry to require a larger buffer in this case to protect water quality and wildlife. b. The applicant did not propose a trail within the stream buffer with this application. If a trail is proposed in the future it will be subject to further review at that time. 4. The hearings officer finds that the proposed development complies with the approval criteria for sensitive lands review based on the findings in the Staff Report. There is no substantial evidence to the contrary. 5. The hearings officer finds that the proposed facility provides an adequate number of off-street parking spaces to accommodate the demands of the proposed fire station, including the community meeting room. As discussed in the Staff Report, TMC 18.765 requires a minimum of 31 and a maximum of 45 off-street parking spaces to accommodate the uses proposed on the site. The applicant proposed 39 spaces which meets both minimum and maximum standards. The applicant is not required to provide parking for the park, since park development is not proposed with this application. D. CONCLUSIONS Based on the findings and discussion provided or incorporated in this final order, the hearings officer concludes that the applicant sustained the burden of proof that the proposed conditional use permit does or will comply with the applicable criteria of the Community Development Code, provided development that occurs after this decision complies with applicable local, state, and federal laws and with conditions of approval warranted to ensure such compliance occurs in fact. E. DECISION In recognition of the findings and conclusions contained herein, and incorporating the Staff Report and public testimony and exhibits received in this matter, the hearings officer hereby approves CUP2007-00003 (TVF&R Walnut Station), subject to the following conditions of approval: CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL THE FOLLOWING CONDITIONS SHALL BE SATISFIED PRIOR TO THE ISSUANCE OF SITE/BUILDING PERMITS: Submit to the Planning Department (Cheryl Caines, 639-4171, ext. 2437) for review and approval: 1. Prior to site work the applicant shall submit a revised site plan for review and approval that shows a buffer along the eastern parking lot that meets the standards of Table 18.745.2 (buffer requirement"C"). CUP2007-00003/SLR2007-00004/VAR2007-00036/SGN2007-00171 Hearings O�cer Final Order (TVF&R Walnut Station) Page 4 2. Prior to the issuance of building permits, the applicant shall submit a screening detail plan for the rooftop air conditioner. 3. Prior to the issuance of building permits, the applicant shall submit plans for review and approval to ensure that traffic flow is clear to all users. 4. Prior to commencing site work, the applicant shall submit construction drawings to both Planning and Engineering that include: A. Protection measures for all trees to be retained on-site including street trees. B. A note prohibiting equipment, vehicles, machinery, grading, dumping, storage, burial of debris, or any other construction-related activities in any tree protection zone; and C. A note stating that only those trees identified on the approved Tree Removal plan are authorized for removal by this report. Notwithstanding any other provision of this title, any party found to be in violation of this chapter [18.790] pursuant to Chapter 1.16 of the Tigard Municipal Code shall be subject to a civil penalty of up to $500 and shall be required to remedy any damage caused by the violation. Such remediation shall include, but not be limited to, the following: 1) Replacement of unlawfully removed or damaged trees in accordance with Section 18.790.060 (D) of the Tigard Development Code; and 2) Payment of an additional civil penalty representing the estimated value of any unlawfully removed ar damaged tree, as determined using the most current International Society of Arboriculture's Guide far Plant Appraisal. 5. Prior to commencing site work, the applicant shall establish fencing as directed by the project arborist to protect the trees to be retained. The applicant shall call for an inspection and allow access by the City Arborist for the purpose of monitoring the tree protection to verify that the tree protection measures are performing adequately. 6. The applicant shall have an on-going responsibility to ensure that the Project Arborist has submitted written reports to the City Arborist, at least once every two weeks, as the Project Arborist monitors the construction activities from initial tree protection zone (TPZ) fencing installation through the building construction phases. The reports shall evaluate the condition and location of the tree protection fencing, determine if any changes occurred to the TPZ, and if any part of the Tree Protection Plan has been violated. If the reports are not submitted to the City Arborist at the scheduled intervals, and if it appears the TPZ's or the Tree Protection Plan are not being followed by the contractor or a sub-contractor, the City can stop work on the project until an inspection can be done by the City Arborist and the Project Arborist. Prior to issuance of any Certificates of Occupancy, the Project Arborist will submit a final certification indicating the elements of the Tree Protection Plan were followed and that all remaining trees on the site are healthy, stable, and viable in their modified growing environment. 7. If work is required within an established tree protection zone, the project arborist shall prepare a proposal detailing the construction techniques to be employed and the likely impacts to the trees. The proposal shall be reviewed and approved by the City Arborist CUP2007-00003/SLR2007-00004/VAR2007-00036/SGN2007-00171 Hearings Officer Final Order (TVF&R Walnut Station) Page 5 before proposed work can proceed within a tree protection zone. The City Arborist may require changes prior to approval. The project arborist shall be on site while work is occurring within the tree protection zone and submit a summary report certifying that the work occurred per the proposal and will not significantly impact the health and/or stabiliry of the trees. 8. Prior to issuance of building permits, the applicant (developer or builder) shall: A. Submit site plan drawings showing the accurate location of the trees that were preserved, the location of tree protection fencing. B. Submit a statement and signature of approval from a certified arborist regarding building and infrastructure siting techniques to be employed in construction with respect to any protected trees on site. Submit to the Engineering Department (Kim McMillan, 639-4171, ext. 2642) for review and approval: 9. Prior to issuance of a site permit, a Public Facility Improvement (PFI) permit is required for this project to cover street improvements and any other work in the public right-of- way. Six (6) sets of detailed public improvement plans shall be submitted for review to the Engineering Department. NOTE: these plans are in addition to any drawings required by the Building Division and should only include sheets relevant to public improvements. Public Facility Improvement(PFI) permit plans shall conform to City of Tigard Public Improvement Design Standards, which are available at City Hall and the City's web page (www.ti ard-or.gov). 10. The PFI permit plan submittal shall include the exact legal name, address and telephone number of the individual or corporate entity who will be designated as the "Permittee", and who will provide the financial assurance for the public improvements. For example, specify if the entity is a corporation, limited partnership, LLC, etc. Also specify the state within which the entity is incorporated and provide the name of the corporate contact person. Failure to provide accurate information to the Engineering Department will delay processing of project documents. 11. The applicant shall provide a construction vehicle access and parking plan for approval by the City Engineer. The purpose of this plan is for parking and traffic control during the public improvement construction phase. 12. Prior to issuance of the Site Permit, the applicant shall pay the addressing fee. (STAFF CONTACT: Bethany Stewart, Engineering). 13. Prior to issuance of the PFI Permit the applicant shall submit plans for the emergency vehicle traffic signal for review and approval. 14. The applicant shall revise the plans to move the westerly driveway 10 feet to the west to align with the driveway across Walnut Street. CUP2007-00003/SLR2007-00004/VAR2007-00036/SGN2007-00171 Hearings Officer Final Order (TVF&R Walnut Station) Page 6 •i . ' . 14. The applicant shall revise the plans to move the westerly driveway 10 feet to the west to align with the driveway across Walnut Street. 15. The applicant shall work with the adjacent property owner to remove a portion of the existing fence to obtain a minimum 400 feet of sight distance from the westerly driveway. 16. The applicant shall obtain approval from the TVF&R Deputy Fire Marshall II for the proposed number and placement of hydrants prior to issuance of the City's Public Facility Improvement permit. 17. Final design plans and calculations for the proposed private water quality and detention facility shall be submitted to the Engineering Department (Kim McMillan) as a part of the Public Facility Improvement (PFI) pernlit plans. Included with the plans shall be a proposed landscape plan and maintenance plan. 18. An erosion control plan shall be provided as part of the Public Facility Improvement (PFI) permit drawings. The plan shall conform to the "Erosion Prevention and Sediment Control Design and Planning Manual, February 2003 edition." 19. The applicant shall obtain a 1200-C General Permit issued by the City of Tigard pursuant to ORS 468.740 and the Federal Clean Water Act. THE FOLLOWING CONDITIONS SHALL BE SATISFIED PRIOR TO A FINAL BUILDING INSPECTION: Submit to the Planning Department (Cheryl Caines, 639-4171, ext. 2437) for revicw and approval: 20. Prior to final building inspection, the applicant shall install a shield on the light pole adjacent to tax lots 4700 and 4800 or direct light away from neighboring residential uses. 21. Prior to final building inspection, the applicant shall record a deed restriction to the effect that any existing tree greater than 6 inches diameter may be removed only if the tree dies or is hazardous according to a certified arborist. The deed restriction may be removed or will be considered invalid if a tree preserved in accordance with this decision should either die or be removed as a hazardous tree. 22. Prior to final building inspection, the applicant shall submit a summary of the biweekly arborist reports prepared by the Project Arborist. The summary shall document the effect of the approved tree protection plan, account for any violations, and certify the condition of protected trees. CUP2007-00003/SLR2007-00004/VAR2007-00036/SGN2007-00171 Hearings Ojfccer Final Order (TVF&R Walnut Station) Page 7 , � Submit to the Engineering Department (Kim McMillan, 639-4171, ext. 2642) for review and approval: 23. Prior to a final building inspection, the applicant shall complete the required public improvements, obtain conditional acceptance from the City, and provide a one-year maintenance assurance for said improvements. 24. Additional right-of-��ay shall be dedicated to the Public along the frontage of SW Walnut Street to increase the right-of-way to 35 feet from the centerline for the full length of the frontage (including the east and west ends). The description shall be tied to the existing right-of-way centerline. The dedication document shall be on City forms. Instructions are available from the Engineering Department. 25. Prior to final building inspection, the applicant shall restore the striping of the bike lane along the frontage of SW Walnut Street. 26. Prior to final building inspection, the applicant's engineer shall provide final sight distance certification for the westerly driveway. ?7. Prior to final building inspection, the emergency vehicle traffic signal shall be fully operational and accepted by the City Engineer. 28. To ensure compliance with Clean Water Services design and construction standards, the applicant shall employ the design engineer responsible for the design and specifications of the private water quality facility to perform construction and visual observation of the water quality facility for compliance with the design and specifications. These inspections shall be made at significant stages, and at completion of the construction. Prior to final building inspection, the design engineer shall provide the City of Tigard Engineering staff with written confirmation that the water quality facility is in compliance with the design and specifications. FAILURE TO SATISFY THE CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL WITHIN 18 MONTHS OF THE EFFECTIVE DATE OF THE HEARINGS OFFICER'S DECISION SHALL RENDER THE HEARINGS OFFICER'S DECISIOI�' VOID. DATED this 19`h day of December 2007. Joe Turner, Esq., AICP City of Tigard Land Use Hearings Officer CUP2007-00003/SLR2007-00004/VAR2007-00036/SGN2007-00171 Hearings Officer Final Order (TVF&R Walnut Station) Page 8 -�, __ ,�, � ; ; �r� _�_��---;-�i �� ------- �Q . . . . : � !�/� �� i � , �� ^-�_i r �� LS PL ! � I � ,/ �'i ��FfII�HAPNIC iNFfiFMAiI(lll SYSiFM �� ; � � ,�---,— , ; '---�--� f---� � �'`- VICINIT�' MAP �--I I'_ '' ` � w > -- �---� � I -- i , I _,¢ —, ; '�� -- ' � ,� ti I' � Q i i--� _ _ 1 u, � � _____________ I r-- , I �� -- ,� " _�" cuP2oo� 00003 , � � �-� ; � N N T — � ---- TUALATIN VALLEY �, � -� FIRE &RESCUE ; ' � r w WALNUT STATION ' o �. > - �v o° o Q AV E m o ° �' � � �( T Op��O � BROOK C i — --I � OC�00�0 0° i � ^ N � 0 LEGEND: sw N sUBJECT � � � SITE , �, — - — --- :�.,�:_,:�,:,: i— °f P�NV� Pp ,j . ��; �N w �` . . � .eK�y a s F..'< F ..�� ,�.� R I E C T �--- � / y`�• � ,Q 4 - 1' NY � ,.I I � I �Trvl'f RU. ' u = QP ��.nf:�.TA v � �� : � � � eE�e�noau. � an:H•:.n. T r�: ' TIPPITT F �� -�� ` --� TiqarA Area Map i a — ♦ N J 0 BO t60 2a0 320 400 Peel � � ��—�� E t"=3s7 leei It _ �u y . x Informatan on Ihls map is for general bcation only anC . ALBE RTA ST sfwulo be verilied wrth Ihe DevelopmeN Services Division � —� 13125 SW Hall Blvd — i�� TigarA,OR 97223 � — '-- (503)639-4171 htlpJlwww.cillgard.or.us � Community Development Plot date: Nov 13,2007;C lmagiclMAGiCO3.APR � + ,r,,,,, �' r r , ,.u...�. t .� r� q i i " r : ��.4, � . � -� �� P B S ,..�-� r ' � r ' ` t� . � - � i 3 ; 7' r,.-�,. . � I [ �'�/�-PRqJECTLOGTION . .. . 'f. /J� w.,' . . . . i. a,.r., , �r �`�^ ""' w.�,%.o.w.o.� - -�. � . - � 5,�� .�..,.. � .w. ....w.«...� ^ ;,. r , � / \�(�f�RD . VI 1=..�,/' s w`u . ��5 ��., �� .�. „_...�. �� ..�., "" �°� � �.�a � ".� . oe``a�. "�� - S}' . . � � c . a � ; 81TE VICINITY MAP <<„�� sx.x.z s r. .��„o x....� � (1.70 ACFESI . . Mr /� rca a Baw `� - - . � � /y~ �Y�CRSS RMO 0 S,q1YMARA ;�� . . � - . � —. —..— —�—.,•-R' .cu�. (iENERAL NOTES J . . - -----�_/ co-�m .c.a Q.�..rr,n.w.��oc,nw..ua.�.�.ocvm � R ��ro�uu a+oow c.�i�'�u'KU:ii x"10"o�r aci�rn�irm.�ur � vcn.wo run suw � a c.rsnnc��u.r wwucrs rm.c.consmucmn .�,�. .�h=,� � z � � . ,/' ,, UTILITY NUMBERE � cin oF rrc�wo so3.eas.ei�i 1^ // TIGMD NBL1G WORNS 503.718.2596 � W ar�� CLEAN WFTER SERVICES 503.68t.3600 W � . . � - 1 rvcnR sw.e�z.�000 �, F;z, ��: . •\ OWEST &10.2M.1111 � y O � N W N A 7 l 1 R A L G A$ 5 0 3.7 2 8.l 2 1 1 � �C 7 � - PGE 507.Y2&6322 �y � - ar,� � � . INDEX TO DRAYVIN(iE z ;�O � . � ��°O1��i ; CA.O p'/k COVER Na�SRE MNROVEMEM PLM1 a Q co.i �c�sri�cconanons Q 3 0� � � � :, �, cta uTUrr v�nN � � C1.1 STORMWATERPLAN r3 �('j � � � on.r�iu uo . � � 'v.r rw� . � C11 GRADIHG IWD EROSION CONTROL PIAN . . ' ��ri�+ _ � . �r-»eon -� C1A EROSIONCONTROLOE711LS 0.�i v'F C2./ 6TORMWATER OETiLLS � � .� . ' '��''/ ... . CI.2 WATERDETNLS � � � . . ; � SI�EBB S.i � � ' �� (0.)]AfFES) � L _'.. � � � l-• . € � - �� , MLIO� �-'�� tf . . ' tM.YYM4 �NYfINC - ' , .. .. � ksS1MCVR�Ir — � �� . . .. �'/ ' _..� f�Ry[w� ial . �• � .. \ /. ' - .__._ ____-1L __�_ � .. , � � i �y'� / .. i 1 . .. — — � / ,�>,,., ,�� --___ I- - -- - - • � ;�� ,� ' �'�� m .±n . ]0'YlMO� • � � � ' - : . I ��I; 'yp[�� , . . . .. . . ... , � I .I v�roos[ 1 . ... . . i.I� db�tv�i o I � i L J hM11N S1MPS.. ..ML .. [ssYSM14 � -� PIICPo40� �� I —_— —�—_ —__ ' •�••• .J� � . .�� iP�5� zeus�rtssa�rs . .. -_'_'� —�L'—'—'L'—'— _ � i.J � �l�p',a e�so�rawc a�cdu � �� S.W. WALNUT STREET � ' " !T� ''°0D�'i31 '�1OM" �_�Wt� t.n.�,r r�oYt�rr i .... rm�ma.«� � n�w I �� . s�� SfTE SUMMARY' �..� a � TN[PMCEL/: 2510{ADD�SOp ; ��••�" �. SITE AREA l]7ILRE5(147337 SO.R.) r . ... COIJF PIAN DE6IG�MTION: LOW DEMSRY RESpENTHI 2pYNC DISTRICT: kJ.S SfTE IMPROVEMENT LEGEND h�� Z , `_r. OUMTER SEC710N: SE 1l�Oi SEC�.TN/Rl W W M. ,�,,, � �J �r�k�2'� `��:�i �} .�i�� .n�wc ca.c«c¢sar+U � �i. � �. ` GENERALINFORMATION: M[w.ssnKiio��[y[h� p q p p E qTy O W N E R' MG/NTECT� APPIICANi: CIVILENGN/EER: '� cwcwe�cvo[wiu IUALAi►IVKLErFNtE6RE5CUE GSEMGMfECTS AMGELOPlA1WN1GGPOUP PB+ENGINEERNKANDENVWOfAENTK � ��o^<vhcorvwr��A cou�x roa l�%x•-ol' � �w u�K��ct<ss ]50 COMMERCIAL GARKWAY BOB THqMP FfiM1K AN('aELO �Y�� C O�O nLOw�.OR Mt]SWCOf18E1TAVENUE fiTO5W1.WN.SUffEZ01 il10NNN5TREET +ss�� PH� 360.69�.85)) PORTLANO.OR9l2p1 PORTUNp.OqB1R05 VANCOWER.WABlfiBO TYPICAL ONSITE PAVEMENT CROSSSECTION FiVC:360.691.Bt57 rH: w�z�e.si�o Pn: sw.za..ezn rrc aso.wo.�zvi E-IML:I�Ltltluwa'a.can FNt:50�.2M.02I] FNL 507.12).]819 FNC 380.BY6.9081 lIIEET 1 OF� a�'vE.roc E�MIL:WaYV�W��.ran E�MIL:WY_^wOP�'mn CIVIOMWMG6 Agenda Item: 2.1 Hearin Date: December 17.2007 Time: 7:00 P11f STAFF REPORT TO THE HEARINGS OFFICER : � FOR THE CITY OF TIGARD, OREGON � ' ' 120 DAYS = 2/29/2008 SECTION I. APPLICATION SUMMARY FILE NAME: TUALATIN VALLEY FIRE AND RESCUE WALNUT STATION CASE NOS: Conditional Use Permit (CUP) CUP2007-00003 Sensiri��c I.ands Re��ic��- (SLR) �I.R2U(17-(10004 :�djustment �'.1R) �'.�R20U7-00036 Sign PcxYnit (SCUN) S(;N2()07-00171 APPLICANT/ Tualatin�'alle�� Nire & Rescue APPLICANT'S .�ngelo Plannin�; Group OWNER: .�ttn: Garti'Wells REP.: ;�ttn: I��rank ,ingelo 20665 SW�B1anTon Street 921 SW WasliingTon Street �11oha, OR 97(l07 Suite 468 Portland, C�R 97205 PROPOSAL: "I'he applicant is reyuesting Conditional L'se appro��al to construct a new fire station «�ith a communit�� room. Sensiti<<e lands re�-ie�y is reyuired because I�rueger Creek and associated wetlands are located on the site. '1'he reyuest is to release treared stormwater into the ��egetated corridor around thc creek. The applicant has also requested an adjustment to reduce the access spacing standards along a collector from 200 feet to 25 feet. ;1 'I'}�p� I applicarion is subrruttcd for a double-faced, freestanding sign (33 square fect total). LOCATION: 12585 SW Walnut Street;WCTM 2S104:�D,Tax Lot 4500. COMPREHENSIVE PLAN AND ZONING DESIGNATION: R-4.5: "11ie R-4.5 zonui� ciistrict is designed to accommodate detached suigle-famil�� homes �vith or without accessort� residenrial uiuts at a mit�imum lot size of 7,50(1 square feet. Dupleaes a�id attac�ed Slllgle-E1TI111\' UIlltS are pennitted coiiditionall}�. Some ci��ic atid insriturional uses aYe also pertnitted condirionall�•. APPLICABLE REVIEW CRITERIA: Commuiun� llcvclo�mcnt Code Chapters 18.33f), 18.360, 18.370, 18.39(1, 18.510, 1 H.7f)5, 18.725, 1�.745, 18.765, 18.775, 18.780, 18.79(l, 18.795 and 1 f�.81 U. SECTION II. STAFF RECOMMENDATION Staff recommends that the Hearings Officer find that the proposed Conditional L'se Pertnit u�ill not ad��ersel}� affect the health, safen� and welfare of the Cin� and meets the Approval Standards for a Condirional Use. Therefore, Staff recommends APPROVAL, subject to the follo�vin� recommended Conditions of Approval. �1'V'I�c�lt\V'.U.NI'7'ti'I'.A'I'IUN ((:l'P2f�7-p(N)03) I'\(�I�. I ��1� 33 1'—/1�/�1- I'l'}31,I(:I11�:.AIiIN(� �I�.U�I�KI{P(llt7�"I�(�l�lll�: III�:.UtI'�(�S(�I�I It:l�:lz , CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL THE FOLLOWING CONDITIONS SHALL BE SATISFIED PRIOR TO THE ISSUANCE OF SITE/BUILDING PERMITS: Submit to the Planning Department (Cheryl Caines,639-4171, eat. 2437) for re��ie�ti� and approval: 1. Prior t<� sire �ti�ork the a��licant shall submit a re�-ised site plan f<>r rc�•ic�v and approval that shows a buffer al�ng rhe castern parking l��t that meets the standards of Table 18.745.2 (buffer requirement «�,»�- 2. Prior to the issuaiicc of builduig ��crinits, the applicant shall subnvr a screctiing detail plan for the rooftop air conditioner. 3. Prior to thc issuance of buildi�ig perinits, the applicant shall submit plans f�r re��ie��- and appro��al to ensure that traffic flow is clear to all users. 4. Prior to commencing site �vork, thc applicant shall submit construction dra�vings to both Plamiing and I�;ngineering that include: .�. Protection measures for all trees to be retained on-site including street trees. B. .1 note prohibiting equipmerit, ��ehicles, machinery�, gradiri�;, dumpuig, storage, burial of debris, or an�� other construction-related acti�rities in an�� tree }�r�,tecuon zone; and C. �1 note stating that onl�• those trees idenrified ou rhe appro�-cd Tree Remo��al plari are auth�>rir.ed for remo��al b�� this report. Not�vithsta�iding an}- <>ther pro��ision of this title, an�• parn� found to be in ��iolation of this chapter [18.79(�) pursuant to Chaprer 1.16 of the Tigard ��unicipal Code shall be subject to a ci�-i1 penalti- of u� to $500 and shall be reyuired to remed�- an}- damage caused b�- the �-iolation. Such remediation shall include, but not be limitec� to, tllc follc��ving: 1) Replacement of unla�vfull�• remo��ed or damaged trees in accordance ��-itli Secuon 18.790.060 (D) of the '1'i�ard De�-elopment Code; and 2) Pa��meiit of aii additional ci�•il penalh� represenring the estimated ��alue of am- unla�vfiill�� remo��ed or damaged tree, as deternuned using the most current Internarional Socien• <�f ,�rboriculture's Guidc for Plarit .1�praisal. 5. Prior ro ec>mmencing site work, thc applicant shall establish fcncin� as directed b�- the project arborist to protect the trees to be retained. '1'he applicant shall call for an inspection and allow acc�ss b�� the City rlrbotist for the pur�ose of monitoruig the trec protection to verif}' rhat the tree protection mcasures are perforinitig adequatel��. 6. '1'he applicant shall ha��e ari on-going responsibilitt- to ensure that the Project :lrborist has submitted written reports to the Ciri� .\rborist, at least once c�-er}� t�vo �veeks, as the Project ��rborist monitors the constructiori acti�-ities from inirial tree protection zone (TP7, feneing installarion through the building construction phases. The reports shall e�-aluate the con�ition and location of the tree protection fencin , deterrnine if anj- changes occurred to the 1'PZ, and if an�� part of tl�c Tr�e Protection Plan has�een t-iolated. I� the reports are not submitted to the Citt� .lrborist at the scheduled intervals, and if it appears the TP7.'s or the Tree 1'rotection Plan are not being followed b}' the contractor or a suU-contractor, the Cite can stop work on the prc�ject until an inspccrion can be done b�� the Cih� .�rborist and the Project .�rborist. Prior to issuance of any� Certificates of Occupanc��, tlie Projcct .�rborist will submit a final certification indicating the elements of the 'Tree Protection I'lan �vere followed and that all remainuig trees on the site are health��, stablc, and ��iable in thcir modified gro�vuig en�-ironment. 7. If�vork is required within an established tree protection zone, the project arborist shall �re�are a proposal detailing the cotistniction recliniques to be emplo}'ed and the likelt� impacts to the trees. The proposal shall be re�-ie�4cd and appro�-ed b�� the City ,lrborist bcfore proposed �vork can proceed �virliin a tree protecti<�n z�>nc �I'he Ciri' .�rborist mat� require changes prior to a��ro��al. The project arborist shall bc c>n sitc while work is occurruig �vithiYi tlie tree protcction zoiie and submir a summai-�� report certify�ing that the work occurred per the proposal and will not significantl�• impact the hcalth and/or stabilin� of the trees. �i��r��t�r°.��,��i�,�r.��i�� r�:��aoo?-ouon3� i�.0;i�.2�>i�33 1'?/1'/0�Pl'Hl.lc:lll:.\RI\(; til'.\I�I�RI•:POR'I"I'<)'I'III(III?.\Kl'�(�tiOI�1�1(;I?R K. Prior to issuance of buildiii��crmits, the a��licant (de�•elo�er or builder) shall: 1�. Submit site plan dra�vings sho�viiig the accurate location of the trees that were preser�-ed, the locarion of tree �rotection fencin�;. I3. Subinit a statement and signaturc ot appro��al from a certified arborist regarding building and infrastructure sitin� techniques to be emplo}�ed in consrruction ��•ith respect to an}- protected trees on sitc. Submit to the Engineering Department (Kim McMillan, 639-4171, ext. 2G42) for review and approval: 9. Prior t<� issuance of a site perinit, a I'ublic l�acilin� Impro��ement (I'I��I) pernut is required for this �r<�ject rr� cover street impro�-ements and an�� other �vork in the public right-of-way. Six (6) sets of detailcd public impro��ement plans shall bc submitted for re��ic�v to th� I�.n�;ineering Department. NO"1'I:: these plaiis are u1 additiori To aiiy ara�vings required b�� the Ruildin�l�i�°ision and should onl�� iriclude sheets rele��ant to �ublic im ro�-cmcnts. 1'ublic I�acilin� Itn�ro��cment (I'I�I) perinit plans shall cc�nform to Cih� of'1'i�;ard Pub�c Improvement Design Standards, �vliich are available at Cit�- I�all and the Cit��'s web pagc (��v��.ti�;arc�-�>r.��). 1(1. 'I'he P}�I permit plan submittal shall include the elact legal name, address and telephone number of thc indi��idual or corp orate enriti- �vho will be desi�,niated as die "Pennittee", and�uho will pro�ride tlie fuiancial assurance for the public unpro�-ements. I�or eaample, specifi' if the entin' is a corporation, limitrd partnership, LLC, etc. .�lso specift� the state ��rithui �vluch the entitt• is�incorporated and �ro��ide the name of the corporate contact person. Failure to proeide accurate informarion to the I:ngineering Department�vill delat�processing of project documents. 11. The applicant shall pro��ide a construction vehicle access and parkin� plan for approtTal b�� the City 1�.n�ineer. 1�e purpose of this plan is for �arkuig and traffic control duruig the public impro�-ement cc>nstruction phase. 12. Prior to issuance of the Site Perniit, the ap�licant shall pa�� the addressing fee. (ST�FF CONTl�CT: Bcthan�- Stewart,Engineering). 13. Prior to issuance of the PFI Permit the a�}�licant shall subrrut plans for the emergenc�� ehicle traftic si�ial for review and approval. 14. '11ie applicant shall re�Tise the plans to mo��e the westerl�- dri��e�va�• 10 feet to the west to align vvith tlie dri�-e�va�� across Walnut Street. � 15. '1'he applicant shall��-ork with the adjacent pro�ert�� o��ner to remo�-e a porrion of the e�isting fence to obtavi a minimum 400 feet of sigl�t disrance from the westerl�-dri��c�va��. 1G. 'I'he a�plicanr shall obtaui ap}�ro��al from thc "l�'I�cYcR Depuh• I�ire l�iarshall iI fc�r rhe proposed number and placement of h��drauts prior to issuance of the City's Public l�acilit�� Impro�-cmcnt pernut. � 17. I�inal desi�,ni lans and calculations for the proposed prieate �vater qualin� and detenrion facilin� shall be submitte� to the Engineeiing llepartment (ltim ��1c1�Iillan) as a part of the Public Tacilin• Impro�rement (1'TI) pcnnit plans. Included �vith thc plans shall be a �rc��osed landsca�c plan and mauitenance pL�n. 18. :1n erosion control plan shall be pro�rided as part of the Public Tacilih- Impro�-cment (PFI) permit dra�vings. "1'hc plan shall conforni to the "1�.rosion Pre��ention and Seditnent Control Desi�Ci and Planr�ig�lanual, Tebruar�� 2003 cdition." 1). 'I'he applicant shall obtain a 12UU-C General Pernut issued bc rhe Cin• of Tigard pursuant to ORS 4G8.74(� and the Federal Clean Water:�ct. '('V'I�&R�V�.0\t'"1'�'I�.A7'1()'� ((;l'Y3(Nl'-00003) P.1(�1�.3()I�33 12/I-/I)-Pl'1�1.1(; I II�:.ARI\(� til'.AI�1�RI�:Y()It�l��f(��I�I II? 1 Il{.ARI\<;ti OI�I�ICI?R THE FOLLOWING CONDITIONS SHALL BE SATISFIED PRIOR TO A FINAL BUILDING INSPECTION: Subinit to the Planning Department(Cheryl Caines, 639-4171, eat. 2437) for revieu�and approval: � ?(1. Prior to fuial buildulg ins��cction, thc a�plicant shall install a shicicl on thc light �olc adjacent to tas lots 4700 and 4800 or direct light a�va�• trom neighboring residenrial uses. Z1. Prior to fuial building inspcction, the applicant shall reeord a deed restricri<�n to rhe effect tliat ari�� elisting tree greater than 6 inches diameter ma�� be remo��ed onl�� if thc rrcc dics or is hazardous according to a certified arbc�rist. 'I'lie deed restriction may� be�remo�-ed or ��-ill be considercd in�-alid if a tree preserned in accordance with this decision should either die or be removed as a hazardous tree. 22. Prior to final building ins�ecticm, the a�rlicant shall submit a summan• of the biweekl�� arborist reports prepared b}• tlie Project :lrborist '1 he summar�' shall docum�nt the effect of the appro�-ed rree �r�tection plan, account for any�-iolations, and certifi• tlie coiiditiori of protected trees. Submit to the Engineering Department (Kim McMillan, 639-4171, ext. 2642) for review and approval: '?3. Prior to a final buildiiig inspecuon, the applicant shall complcte thc required public impro�-ements, obtain condiuonal acceptance from the Cin•, and pro�•ide a one-��ear maintenance assurance for said impro�rements. � 24. :�ddirional right-of-wa�• sllall be dedicated to the I'ublic alon� the frontage of S��' Walnut Strcet to increase the right-of-�i�a�' to 35 feet from the ccnterlin� for the full length of the fr<�titage (including the east and west ends). The descriptioii shall be tied to the e�istin r right-�f-�va}- centerline. The dedicauon document shall be on Cin- forms. Instructions are a�ra�able from the I:nguieering Department � 25. Prior to final building ins�ection, the applicant shall restore tl�e striping of the bike lane along the frontage of SW Walnut Street. ?G. Prior to final building inspection, the applicant's engineer shall pro�Tidc fiizal sight distance certificatiori for the ��esterl�� dri��c��ra��. 27. Prior to final building ins�ecrion, the emergency� eehicle traffic signal shall be full�- operarional and accepted b�� the Citt• l:iigineer. 28. The applicant shall place the e�isting o��erhead utilin- lines along SW Wal�iut Street underground as a part of this project, or, if a pro��ed b�- the Ciri� I;ngineer, the}• shall pa�� the fee in-licu of undergrounding. Th� fee shall �e calculated b�- the frontage of the site that is parallel to the utiliri- lines and will be �a35.�(1 per lineal foot. If the fee opuon is appro�-ed, die amount �vill be �16,275.00 and it shall be paid �rior to final building inspection. 29. To ensure compliance �uith Clean Water Sen°ices design and construction standards, the applicant shall employ the design engineer responsible for the desi�;ri and speciticarions of the pri��ate water qualin� faeilit�� to perform construction and ��isual obsen�ation of the �vater qualin- facilin' for complianee with tlie design and specifications. 'I'hese inspections shall be made at signiticant stages, and at completion of the construcuoti. Prior to final building inspection, the design engineer shall prcn�ide tlle Citt� of'I'igard F.ngineerin� staff�uith �vritten confirmarion that the water yunlin- facilih� is in compliancc ��-ith dle desi�n and s�ecificatic>us. FAILURE TO SATISFY THE CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL WITHIN 18 MONTHS OF THE EFFECTIVE DATE OF THE HEARINGS OFFICER'S DECISION SHALL RENDER THE HEARINGS OFFICER'S DECISION VOID. �I'V�l�&R\C'.AI.'�l`1�ti�l�.A�l�l()\ ((:l'1'?Ixl?-UIII)U3) I'.A(;I•:-�(>I�33 13/17/07 Pl'�RI,1C I II{.ARIN(� ti'I'.AI�I�HI�.P()127'"1'U"1'I II�:I[I?.ARIN(�S OI�l�l(:I(I2 SECTION III. BACKGROUND INFORMATION Sitc Infortnation and Pro�osal llcscri�tiou: 'I'hc site is a 3.?� parcel on the nortli side of SW�x�alnut Street«�hich had been de�-cloped ��-itl� a residence and sc��eral outbuildings. '1'he home �vas burned as a fire e�ercise for 'I'ualatiii �'allc�• I�ire and Rescue, �vhilc the esisting outbuildings �vill be dcmolished as part of this de��elopment. tic��cral trecs elist on the site mostl�� located alon� peruneter. '1'he proposal is for an 11,882 square foot fire staric>n with commutiin� rootn. 1�rue rer Creek and associated ��ctlands are found on-site. :� srorm�uatcr<�utfall is �roposed ��ithiii tlie��e�;etate�corridc>r of the sensiti�-e area. �itc I�istor��: �1 re�-ie�v of Cin� records re�realed tliar rhe �r<�perty�vas anne�ed to the cin' in 1972. Serisiti��e lands re�riew (SI,R2004-0O0O8 and 00O(19� �v�s rcyuired f�>r street impro�-ements within the Iirue�cr Crcek corridor. No othcr land uses cases were found. Vicinit�� Information: 'I'he arca is dc��eloped witli single familt� homcs withui subdivisions and on acreage. '1'lie site is surrounded b}' R-4.5 zoning. "l�here are somc [�ockers of R-12 and R-25 zoning in the arca along ��ith sotne condorniniums and single-famil}' artaclied de�-elo}�ments. Jack Park is 1�>cated directl�- north of the site. SECTION IV. DECISION MAKING PROCEDURES, PERMITS AND USE Use Classification: Section 18.130.020 Lists the Use Categories. `I11e applicant is proposing to coiistnict 1u 11,882 square foot fire starion�vith communiri' room. '1'lus faciliri' is defuied as l:mergenc�� Sen�ices �vithin the use classificarion secrion of the Tigard l�e��el<�pment Code. I;niergenc�� Sen�ices is permitted b�• Condirional l'se ul the R-4.5 zone. Summary Land Use Pertnits: Chapter 18.310 Defines the decision-making rype to which the land-use application is assigned. 1'he pr��osed use is a Condirional Use,wluch is a 'I'}'pe III-I�O (Hearings Officer) decision. SECTION V. SUMMARY OF APPLICABLE CRITERIA :� summar�- ��f the applicable cri�cria iil rlle Cliapter order u7��-luch the�- are addressed are as follo��-s: A. 18.330 Specific Conditional Use Criteria (Gcncral :��pro�-al Criteria) (�ldditional Cc>riciirioris of.1pprc��al) B. Applicable Development Code Standards 18._36(1 (�ite lle�-elopmenT Revie��) 1 f�.370 (�'ariances and .�djustments) 18.510 (Residcririal Zoi�i�;Districts) 18.705 (.lccess, L;gress & Circularion) 18.725 (};m�ironmE:ntal Perform�ncc �tandards) 1 H.745 (I_.aiidscapin�and Screeiiuig) 18.755 (1�lixed Solid Waste 8c Rec��elable Sr�rage) 18.7G5 (Off-Strect Parkuig a�id I.oadiiig Rcyuircmcnts) 18.775 (Sensirive Lands) 18.78O (Signs) 18.79(1 ('1'ree Rem��•al) 1�3.795 (�'isual Clcarancc) G Street and Utility Improvement Standards (18.810� D. Im�act Stud,L(18.390� �1'V'I�&R\V'.AI\l'l��l'.A7l()� (�:L'VZ(N1'-(NN103) I'.A(�1�:i OI�33 1'_'/17/07 Yl'fil.l(:I II?.ARItiG ti'1'.AI�I�RI�:P()R�l��I�()"I'I II�:I11•:.11Z1`�<;ti OI�I�ICf�.R SECTION VI. APPLICABLE REVIEW CRITERIA AND FINDINGS A. SPECIFIC CONDITIONAL USE APPROVAL CRITERIA Section 18.330.010.A states that the purpose of this chapter is to provide standards and procedures under vvhich a conditional use may be permitted, enlarged or altered if the site is appropriate and if other appropriate conditions of approval can be met. There are certain uses which due to the nature of the impacts on surrounding land uses and public facilities require a case-by-case review and analysis. Section 18.330.020.A states that a request for approval for a new conditional use shall be processed as a Type III-HO procedure, as regulated by Chapter 18.390.050, using approval criteria contained in Section 18.330.030A and subject to other requirements in Chapter 18.330. GENER.AL APPROVAL CRITERIA FOR A CONDITIONAL USE: SECTION 18.330.030 The site size and dimensions provide adequate area for the needs of the proposed use; '1'he e�isting sitc is approxirriatel�- 142,6G(1 syuare fcet (3?8 acres). Thc proposed builduig is 11,882 square feet. '1'l�e building and associatec� parking�vill cc>�-er 43,163 square feet (approaimatel�- 3(1°�0) of the site. `l�is report e�-aluates the proposal and necessar�� setbacks, landscaping, etc., and as demonstrated u1 the a�plication and this report, the site size is adeyuare f<>r the nccds of the proposed use. The impacts of the proposed use of the site can be accommodated considering the size, shape, location, topography, and natural features; 'I'he stati��n and associated paxking ha��e been desi�,nied tc> fit in the southeast c<�rner of the site, a��oiciing the sensiri�-e areas. "I'he fire starion, aloii� �vith ass<>ciated parking, �vill co�-er appro.r-imatcly 30% of the site. Impacts c>f the pro}�osed usc can bc accc>mm<>dared�ti�ithin the sire�arameters. All required public facilities have adequate capaciry to serve the proposal; and .�11 �ublic faeiliries including streets and sr��rm se�vers lla��e adequate capacin� to sen�e the site as discussed in dctail elsc��hcrc in this rcport. The applicable requirements of the zoning district are met except as modified by this chapter. "1'hc ��ro�osed site is located ��ithin the It-�.S z<>ning district. Emergenc�� Ser�-ice facilities are erinitted conditionall�°. .1s discussed in this report, the �roject will mect the applicable reyuirements of t�e zoning district. � The supplementary requirements set forth in other chapters of this Code including but not limited to Chapter 18.780, Signs, and Chapter 18.360, Site Development Review, if applicable, are met or can be conditioned to be satisfied. "1'he a��plicable re��ie�v criteria in tlus case uiclude the follownig chapters of the Coinmunin� De�-elopment Code: 18.330, Condirional L'se; 18.360, Site De��elopment Re�riew; 18.370, Variances atid .ldjustments; 18.390, Decision 1�iaking Procedures; 18.510, Residenrial 7.oning Districts, 18.705, .lccess, I?gress and Circulation; 18.725, Environmental Performa�ice �taridards; 18.745, Landsca�ui� and Screening; 18.765, Off-Street Parking; 18J75, Sensiri��e I,ands; 18.78(1, Signs; 18.790, '1'ree Removal; 18.795, �risual Clearance .lreas; and 18.810, Street and L'rilin• Impro��ement tita�idards. 'I'he de��clopment standards and requirements of these chapters are addressed further ui this report. `1'he proposal contains no elements related to the pro��isions of the follo�vui� chapters: 18.350, Planned De�Telopment; 18.380, Zoning I�1ap/Text .-lmendments; 18.410, Lot I.inc :�djustments; 18.420, Land Parririons; 18.430, Subdi�-isions; 18.51(l, Commcrcial 'I.onin� Districts; 18.52U, Industrial 7.oning Districts; 18.G2f1, Tigard Triangle Desi�1 Standards; 1 H.0 3(.), Wasl�igton Square Kc�ional Center; 18.G40 Dutham Quarr�� Desi�i Standards; 18.711), ��ccessort� Residenrial [`iuts; 18.715, llensiri• Computarions; 18.720, Dc sign Comparibilih- Standards; 18.730, Exce�tioris to lle�•elopment Standards; 1 H.740, Historic O�rerla�-; 18.742, f Iome Occupations; 18.750, 1�lanufactured/1�fobile Home Regularions; 18.760, N�nconfortning �ituarions; 1�.785, 1'emporar�- Uses; and 18.798, Wireless Commuiucario�is }�aciliries. 'l�ese chapters are, tlicrcfore, foutid ro bc viapplicable as ap��ro�-al standards. �l�V'I�&It��'.U,NI��I'ti'1�.A"17t)\((:GY2007-00003) I'-AGI(b(11�33 13/17/�)7 Pl'Bl,l(: III?.VZINC� ti'1'.11�1�RI�:I'(>1t7�"1'O"1'lll? III:.ARI?�(�tiOI�I�ICI:It The use will comply with the applicable policies of the Comprehensive Plan. "1'he Communin� De�-cl�>�mcnt Code implrments the C�>m�rchciisi�-e Plaii. Com�liance ��ith Cotnprehensi�-e Plan �olicics are, thcrcfore, assurcd b�- satisfaction of thc applicablc devclopment stanc�ards ��f the de��elopment code as addtessed within this rcport. I�INllING: Iiased on thc aual��sis abo��c, thc Ge�ieral �1p}�r<�val Crircria for a Conciirional Urse are satisfied. ADDITIONAL CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL FOR CONDITIONAL USE. Section 18.330.030.B states that the Hearings Authoriry may impose conditions on the approval of a conditional use, which are found necessary to ensure the use is compatible with other uses in the vicinity, and that the impact of the proposed use on the surrounding uses and public facilities is minimized. These conditions may include, but are not limited to the following: Limiting the hours, days,place and/or manner of operation; 'l�he proposed use is a fire stati��n anc� therefore setting limits on l�ours or matmer of operation is nor feasiblc. Requiring design features wliich minimize environmental impacts such as noise, vibration, air pollution, glare, odor and/or dust; '1'he �roposal �vill not gcncrate an�� air pollutiori, odor, glare, or dust that �could be considered out of character for the use. l�n emergeric�° �°ehicle signal is proposed to alle��iate the need to utilize sirens. Because the siren is used for safeti� wlien maneu��ering in traffic, no further limitarions will be imposed to reduce noisc impacts. � Requiring additional setback areas, lot area, and/or lot depth or width; '1'he proposed fire stauon meets or eaceeds aii�- setback reyuiremeiits. "I'he mii�num lot size for emergenc�- sen�ices (5,(l�� square feet) is also exceeded suice thc sitc is o�-er 142,231 square feet. No addirional lot area or setbacks are necessar��. Limiting the building height, size or lot coverage, and/or location on the site; "I'hc proposal is far below thc allo��-aiices for lot co��erage and builduig height Because there are sensiti��e laric3s on the site, the building has beeri located vi the southeast corner. l�urtl�er limitations are not necessar�� for thcse standards. 'I'his critcrion is sarisficd. Designating the size, number, location and/or design of vehicle access points; '1'hree ��ehicle access points are proposed. '1`lic Eire station needs �-isitor traffic to be kept se}�arate from the areas accessible to etnplo��ees. Safeh� lias been re��ie�ved b�� the ap��lieant's traftic engineer (1�ItS :lssociatcs). '1'he three access points meet the code requirements�cscept acccss s�acin� standards along a collect<�r. .�n adjustment is beuig appr<nred to allo�v the proposed spacin�. Requiring street right-of-way to be dedicated and street(s) to be improved; .A recent project«-idened and un�r��ed SW ��G'alnur Street. Riglit-�>f-��-a�- at botl� e�ids �>f the site does not meet current standards of 35 feet from centerline. '1'he additional dedication is required as discussed under the Streets and L'rilin- sections of this reporr. Requiring landscaping, screening, drainage and/or surfacing of parking and loading areas; '1'hese items arc addressed latcr in this re�cn-t .�s conditioncd, thc �r<>�osal ��ill cneet the prescribed rcquirements of the 'I'igard I�c�•cl<>�ment Cc�dc ('1'DC). Limiting the number, size, location, height and/or lighting of signs; 1'V'I�&Ii\V�.U\l'�1�ti l'.A11()'� ((�l'I'?O(1'-UOO(13) 1'.A(;I�:�()I�33 12/17/0?Yl'RI,fC I II�:.ARI\(� S'1'.V�I�ltl il'<)R'l"I'()'!'I II�:I II:.AIZI\Gti OI�I�I(;I;ll Onl�� one freestandii�g sigii is proposed. _� sigii perniit a��lication �vas submitted as parr of thc pr�>posal. '1'hc�proposed si�ii mcets the rec�uirements for a non-resi eiitial usc �vitlun a residential z�»ie. Limiting or setting standards for the location and/or intensiry of outdoor lighting; :A li�;hting p1ar7 was submitted that sho��-s the location and lurninaries of proposed pole and wall-mounted fisrures. Onc light pole ui the einplo�•ee parki�ig arca spills o��er into the back ��ards of nei�hboring pr<>�ertics. Staff suggests the Hearuig's Officer ask about the intcrisiti� of die light and sug�est a sliield if llCCCSSfiLT. Requiring berms, screening or landscaping and the establishment of standards for their installation and maintenance; `I'he laiidscape buffer along the �vestern boundar�• dc�es n��r meet Code. 'I'he applicant has bee�i condirioned ro re�-ise the buffer. "1'his criterion is discussed in more detail later in this report. Requiring and designating the size, height, location and/or materials for fences; W<�oden fencing is proposed around the trash/rec��clables stora�e area. Shrubben- will further screcn the enclosure. '1'his criterion is sarisfied. � � Requiring the protection and preservation of existing trees, soils,vegetation,vvatercourses, habitat areas and/or drainage areas; '1'he buildin� is located in the southeast corner of the sitc ro miniinize impact tc� the c�n-site wetlands and Itruc�er Creek. "I"he original proposal ��as to trencli a st�>rm line to the creek frotn tlic pr�>p<�sed water yuality/detention facilih�. To minirnize im�acts oii tlie creck and wetlands, the ap}�licanr has re��ised the proposal to discharge the stormwater to t�ow irito the ��e�etared corridor before drainin�; int�> I�rueger (;reek. 'I"�vo trccs are being remo�-ed, but rhe majorin� of trces on-site are bein� retained. '1'his standard is nie t. Requiring the dedication of sufficient open land area for a greenway adjoining and within the floodplain when land form alterations and development are allowed within the 100-year floodplain; and Requiring the construction of a pedestrian/bicycle pathway within the floodplain in accordance with the adopted pedestrian/bicycle pathway plan. '1'herc is uo flood��lain on or adjacent to the site. '1'hese criteria are satisfied. ADDITIONAL DEVELOPMENT STANDARDS FOR CONDITIONAL USE TYPES: SECTION 18.330.050 Emergency Services and Basic Utilities: a. Minimum lot size shall be 5,000 square feet; b. Minimum setbacks shall be those in the applicable zone; c. Height limitation shall be in accordance with Chapter 18.730; d. Off-street parking and loading requirement shall be in accordance with Chapter 18.765; and e. Screening shall be in accordance with Chapter 18.745. The site is appro�imatel�• 3?8 acres. Setbacl:s, hcight, off-street parking and screening standards ha�-e been met and are discussed furtlier in relati�-c secrions of this report. I�INllING: 'I'he additional standards for conditioual use t1`pes can be satisfied as conciirioned belo�v. CONDI'IION: Prior to fmal buildvig vis�ccrirni, thc applicant shall install a shicld on thc light pole adjacent to tas lots 47OO and 4H(1(1 ��r direct light awa�• fr<>m nei�hb<>ring msidenrial USCS. l'V'I��IZ�r'.A 1,?�;l�'I'S'1'.A�I lO'�� ((:l'1'3(Ifl?-OU003) I'.A(�I�:8(l I�33 13/I?/U�Pl'lil.11:I 11�..1R1N(; ti'I'.AI�I�RI?P(1R'I'7'()'I'UI:I II�:.ARIN(;S OI'I'1(:I�.R l'V'I�&li�C'.U.N L''1'ti I�-A�I l(>\ l(:l'P?fxl'-(IfN If 13j I'.A(�I�:9<l I�33 12/17/07 PUHI.I(:I II�:.ARI'.��c� ti'1'.U�I�RI:1'()R'1"l'()7'I ll:1 II�:.U2IV�(��<11�1�1(.l�:R , • � B. APPLICABLE DEVELOPMENT CODE STANDARDS SITE DEVELOPMENT REVIEW (18.360� The Site Development Review approval standards require that a development pro osal be found to be consistent with the various standards of the Community Development Code. �he proposal's consistency with these Code Chapters is revie�ved in the following sections. 18.360.090 Approval Criteria. The Director shall make a finding with respect to each of the following criteria when approving, approving with conditions, or denying an application: Compliance v��ith all of the applicable requirements of this tide including Chapter 18.810, Street and Utiliry Standards; '1'lus ��-i11 bc addresscd in thc rele�-ant other sections of tlus re��>rt. Relationship to the natural and physical environment: a. Buildings shall be: (1) Located to preserve existing trees, topography and natural drainage where possible based upon existing site conditions; (2) Located in areas not subject to ground slumping or sliding; (3) Located to provide adequate distance between adjoining buildings for adequate light, air circulation, and fire-fighting; and (4) Oriented with consideration for sun and wind. b. Trees shall be preserved to the extent possible. Replacement of trees is subject to the requirements of Chapter 18.790,Tree Removal. "1'he builduig is pr<��<�sed in the S��' corner of the site to miiiimize impacts on I�rueger Creek. .�s proposed, ttvo trees will be removed. Both are �vithin or near parkin�; areas. llrainage will be preser��ed or improved throughout the site. Based on the topograph��, the site dranis naturall�� to the nortli and west to�vard thc creek. T1ie majc�ritt� of the �ro�osed graciing is to create a �vater qualit��/detenrion pond ��here the storm �vater will be collected before beuig released ulto the creek. "I'liere �vill be no circularion, solar or wind issues since there arc n�> <>tlicr buildin�;s �roposed. Exterior elevations: a. Along the vertical face of single-family attached and multiple-family structures... '1'lus is uot a single-fatnil�� or mulri-famil�-project. '11us standard docs not appl�-. Buffering, screening and compatibility between adjoining uses: a. Buffering shall be provided betu•een different rypes of land uses, for example, between single- family and multiple-family residential, and residential and commercial uses, and the following factors shall be considered in determining the adequacy of the type and extent of the buffer... Based on tl�e liufferin�; I�laritia ("I'able 18.745.1), no buffering or screei�ig is rcquircd bettveen the proposed and eaistui>uses, cmer�ency senrices and the exisring singlc-fanul�� residences. '1'he prc�posed �arkuig area on the east si�e of tl�e sirc must be buffemd. Setbacks of ar lcast G6 fcct esist bet�veen thc roposed builduig and neighboring properties. ��n 8-9 foot landscapc buffcr is �roposcd �vith an e�-cr�rccn �cd�;e, wluch does not meet the standard. '1'lus is discussed further under thr l.andscapvig and Screeiung section of tlus report. Privacy and noise: multi-family or group living uses: T1us is not a multi-famil�� pruject, therefc�re this stauc3ard is inal��licable. Private outdoor area: multi-family use: '1'lus is not a multi-fainil�•project, therefore tlus standard is uiap�licable. 'fV'I�&R\V'.U,NI"1'ti'l�.A"1'I<�'�� (�:l'1''_'Ou--f)0�1(I�� I'.A(�I�. II)()I�33 12/17/0�PUR1J(:I II�:.ARI'�(� S�C.U�I�RI?P()R'1'�I'(>�1'I II{I II(\Rlti(�S OI�I�I(J?li Shared outdoor recreation areas: multi-family use: 'I1us is nc�t a niulti-fanul�� rojecr, thercfore tliis sraridard is uiapplicable. Where landfill and/or development is allowed within and adjacent to the 100-year floodplain... 1�'his arca docs not abut or lic withui a 1(lU-�-car flood�laiii. '1'hc neatest floodplaui is 2,l)(111 }ect to thc northcast of thc site alon� Sunitncr Crcck. 'I'l�c fl<xxi c�c�°arion at that point is 166 feet, while thc lowest ele�-ation oii the subject site is ?(1H. '1'�ierefor� tlus srand�irci is inapplicable. Demarcation of public, semi-public and private spaces for crime prevention: a. The structures and site improvements shall be designed so that public areas such as streets or public gathering places, semi-public areas and private outdoor areas are clearly defined to establish persons having a right to be in the space, to provide for crime prevention and to establish maintenance responsibility; and �"isitor parkin� is located on the west side of the buildin�; near the corrununiR- room entrance. 1�.inpl<��-ee parking is on the east side of tlie builduig. No <>ri-site ��alk��a��s are pro�-ided that connect the h��o arcas. Crime prevention and safety: a. Windows shall be located so that areas vulnerable to crime can be surveyed by the occupants; b. Interior laundry and service areas shall be located in a way that they can be observed by others; c. Mail boxes shall be located in lighted areas having vehicular or pedestrian traffic; d. The exterior lighting levels shall be selected and the angles shall be oriented towards areas vulnerable to crime; and e. Light fixtures shall be provided in areas having heavy pedestrian or vehicular traffic and in potentially dangerous areas such as parking lots, stairs, ramps and abrupt grade changes. Fixtures shall be placed at a height so that light patterns overlap at a height of seven feet which is sufficient to illuminate a person. The applicant srates that public saferi- and crime �re�-�nrion ��-cre considered ��-hen desi��ig the fire stari<>n. Clear hnes of sight and ��isibiliri• are pro�-ided for �ublic areas. I.i�;h�ig is pro�-ided to a�-oid dark sj�aces and assure safett� and comfort for members of the public. .� lightiii�plan�vas proeided wirl� the application. 'l�ie proposed plaii ��as re�-ie�ved b��`1'i�ard Police and no objecuoris�vere gi��en. Public transit: a. Provisions within the plan shall be included for providing for transit if the development proposal is adjacent to or within 500 feet of existing or proposed transit route... T'�le site is not adjacciit tc> a rransit route; the Walriut titreet route (#45) turns north at 121^' .�vcnuc. '1'lus intersecrion is less than half a nule east of the site. 'I'his criterion is not applicable. Landscaping: a. All landscaping shall be designed in accordance with the requirements set forth in Chapter 18.745; b. In addition to the open space and recreation area requirements of subsections 5 and 6 above, a minimum of 20 percent of the gross area including parking, loading and service areas shall be landscaped; and c.A minimum of 15 percent of the gross site area shall be landscaped. The de�-clopirieiit site is appr<�simatel�� 1�?,231 squarc fccr. "171c proposed landscaping is a�protunatel�� 21,98G squarc feet; thcrefcirc 15.5°'0 of the site is bcin� landscaped. '111is tigure does not take irrto considerati<�ii all of the per�-i<>l�s o�e�i space on tl�e site,c�nl�- tlie landscaped areas. This standard is inet. Drainage: All drainage plans shall be designed in accordance with the criteria in the adopted 1981 master drainage plan; llrainage will be re�-ic��-ed utider 1�.H1O, L'riliries. '1'hc ]�roposed storni drainage plaii has been desi�,nicd iti accordance with Clean �X�'ater ticr�•ices (CVG'S) I�esi�i and Construcrion Standards��-hich meet and crceecl tl�c rcquirements of the 1981 master drauia�;e�lan. �1'\7�&12\C�.0\l'"1'til'.A"I'1O\ ((:l'I''?�xl'-OO(x)3j P.1(�I? 11 OI�33 L'/1-/0-VCHI.I[:I II�:.UiI.'�G til'.U�I�RI?YOR'1"1'U'1'I II?I fl{.Utl?�(�ti OI'I�l(:I�:R 1 Provision for the disabled: All facilities for the disabled shall be designed in accordance ��ith the requirements set forth in ORS Chapter 447; and '1'he a��licant states that the de�-elo�me�it is bevig ciesi�,nieci ui accordance ��-ith �1ll:1 requirements. '1'�-pica 1�- :AD:1 rcquirements are re�-ie��ed b�- the '1'igard 13tuldin�; Di�-ision. "l��vo accessible �arkiii� spaces arc �rc�p<�scd as rcyuired. � All of the provisions and regulations of the underlying zone shall apply unless modified by other sections or this title, e.g., Planned Developments, Chapter 18.350; or a variance or adjustment granted under Chapter 18.370. '1'he a��plicant is requestuig an adjustment tc� the access/c�;ress s�acu��standards. Criteria for this adjustment am addressed under the �'ariances and ��djusmlents secric�n of this rcport. I�INI�ING: Tlie re��ie�v crircria of the site de�-elopment staiidards are met. Variances and Adjustments (18.370� Section 18.705.020.C.5 states that in all zoning districts vvhere access and egress drives cannot be readily designed to conform to Code standards within a particular parcel, access with an adjoining property shall be considered. If access in conjunction w�ith another parcel cannot reasonably be achieved, the Director may grant an adjustment to the access requirements of Chapter 18.705 through a Type II procedure, as governed in Section 18.390.030, using the follow�ing approval criteria: . It is not possible to share access; . There are no other alternative access points on the street in question or from another street; . The access separation requirements cannot be met; . The request is the minimum adjustment required to rrovide adequate access; . The approved access or access approved with conditions will result in a safe access; and . The visual clearance requirements of Chapter 18.795 will be met. I�ue to tlie site's pr<�timir�- t�� esisting dri��e��-a�-s aiid strcets alon r ��'aLiut, the applicant cannot mcct the spacing standard of ?U(1 feet. "1'he easternmost access �vill be �ocated approtunatel�- 25 feet from the nearest residential dri�-c��-a�; thcrcforc an adjustment is bein� requested. The applicant�has �roposcd three access points to Waliiut �'1'he s�acing of these dri�-e�va��s dc�es not ineet the standard. '1'he aj�plicant's traffic engineer states that duc to thc nanirc of tl�c pmposed uses, three separate dri�-c�va�-s are recommended. Emergenc}' �'ehicles ha�=e specific needs and should be kept separate from the ��isitor aehicles. ��djacent e�ismi�; access dri��es are for residential usc. Shared access between residential uses and fire trucks�emplo��ees is not a��ropriate. Walnut is die <>ul�� street access to the site due to the sensiti��e lands on-site and existin�; dc:��cic>��ment patterns. The applicant designed the �lan to ha�-c minimal off-site traffic impacts by making the eastern dri��eway enter-onit� for fire trucks and emplo��ees. ,�ccordui�; to the a]��I1C1rit's traffc enginecr, traffic volumes at tlus dri�-e�va�� vill be lo�v and s�rcad throughout the da��. '1'he nuddle dri�reway is signalized and is exit- onl�- for fire trucks. 'I'he emer��nc}� �°ehicle traffic signal �vill elitninate potenttal ��elucle conflicts. The �vestern-most dri�-e ��-i11 be entr��/c:�it for �-isitors and em�lo��ees. Traffic rolume for this access is also estimated to be lo�v. .� gate is �roposed to pre��ent �-isitor traffic from accessing the rear of the building and e�iring through the em�lo��ee entrance. Based on infc>rmation pro��ided bt' the traffic engineer, the proposed design is not e�pected to create an unsafe situati<�n al�rig Walnut �treet The rcyuest is the trunimum necessar��. There is currentl�� one access to the sitc. The proposed site plan �vill add one new entrance-onl}� access aiid ��ne esit-��ril��access. Based ��ti tl�e site plan, tliere are no structures etistu�g or pr<>posed within the �-ision cicaratice �areas. :1 neighbor's fcilce pre��ents sight-distance to the east. "I'he a��licant is conditioned to meet diis reyuirement b�-the Cin's I;n�ineering di�-ision. I�INDING: The proposed uses ha��e unique traffic flow necds. llue to the lar�e number of eaisting dri��e��a��s along Walnut, it is not �ossible t�� meet tl�e access spacing srandards. Sliared access or access froin another street is not an option. "1'he proposed dc�-el��pment has been designed to minitnize traftic impacts and �vill not create a hazardous situation. I�or these I'V'I�&R\�'.AI\l"1�S'1�.A�l�l()'� ((:l'I''?0�'-(X1003) P.A(�I: I?(�I�33 1?/1?/0�I'l'Bl.l(:I II�:.AKI\c� til'.U�I�Rl?POR"1��1'O 7'I11{I lli.A121�(�ti OI�I�I<:I?R reaso�is, thc acljusrmcnr rcyucst is appro��ed. RESIDENTIAL ZONING DISTRICTS (18.510� The R-4.5 zoning district is designed to accommodate detached single-family homes with or without accessory residential units, at a minimum lot size of 7,500 square feet. Duplea:es, attached single-family residences, and some civic and institutional uses are permitted conditionally. Scction 18.520.040 states that Development standards in Residential zoning districts are contained in Table 18.520.2 below: TABLE 18.510.2 DEVELOPl�ZENT STANDARDS IN RESIDENTIAL ZONES STANDARD R--1.5 Proposed Minimum Lot Size �i� 7,500 s.f. 1-1'',?i I s.C. Avera e Minimum Lot Width 50 ft. 4G? ft. Maximum Lot Covera e - 43,1G5 s.f. Minimum Setbacks - Front vard 20 ft. 20 ft. - Side facing street on corner&through lots 15 ft. '_�;/_� - Side yard 5 ft. GG.S ft./281ft. -Side or rear yard abutting more restrictive zoning district - - - Rear vard 15 ft. 1-11 ft. - Distance between front of gatage & property line abutting a public or 20 ft. i�/.1 rivate street. Maximum Hei bt 30 ft. 20 ft., 11 in. � Minimum Landsca e Re uirement - 15.i°�� I� \hnnnum Int siii i>Ir.iscd�m rc.i�icnnal usc.unlc. l hc�ablc�lncs nnt s�ccih a minimum l01.izc ti�r ci�ic usrs. Cnn�liti�m:d l'sc s[anduds myuirc a mittimum I�rt sizc ut SINNI syuurc(crt. �2�'I'hc mcatiurcmcnt Procidcd b�thr apPlicunt is u�thc hi�,l�cst�*ablc(2G ft.. 11 in.). Bascd on thc Uc�rl�>Pmcnt(:u�3c[hc hci};ht is mcu.urcd tc�thc a�cra�;c h�ight ��f thc hiqhcst};.�blc r�f a pitchcd rex>E 'lhat mcasuremcnt is'_'�I ft.,11 in. Based on the site plan and supplemental uiformarion pro�•ided b�- the applicant, the de��elopment standards fc>r the R-4.5 zone are met. Tlle proposed use is condiuonal ��ithui the zone, and additional de��elopment standards ma�- appl��. 7liese reqturements are met as discussed under the Condiriorial L'se secrion of tlus decision. �INDING: Based on tlic uiformation pro��ided 'az the narrari�-e and on the site plan, the dc��elopment standards ui the R--�.S zc>ne are satisfied. ACCESS, EGRESS AND CIRCULATION (18.705� No building or other permit shall be issued until scaled plans are presented and approved as provided by this chapter that show how access, egress and circulation requirements are to be fulfilled. The applicant shall submit a site plan. "1'lirec dri��ewa��s arc pr<>�ose�� f�>r thc site. '1'hc eastern dri��e is a one-wa�� access for �mplo�°ces aiid fuc trucks. '1'he wcsrern dri�-e is access�egress for ��isitors and an egress point f<�r emplo�•ees. I�ire trucks �vill ctit thc sire b�� a third c�ne-wat� dri��c in the ccnter. All vehicular access and egress as requited in Sections 18.705.030H and 18.705.030I shall connect directly with a public or private street approved by the City for public use and shall be maintained at the required standards on a continuous basis. .�11 threc ciri��es are connected to ��'alriut titrcet, a public street. 7�'I�&li\ti'.U.NI''1'ti'I'.A7�1()\ ((;l'1'3f10?-fxl(N13) P.A(;I�: 13 OI�33 12/17/f17 I'l'Iil.l(:I II?.AKIN(� �l'U�I�HI�:I'()R'I"I�()'1'l ll?I II?.UiltiGti OI�I�I(:I•:R Joint access: Ovaners of two or more uses, structures, or parcels of land may agree to utilize jointly the same access and egress when the combined access and egress of both uses, structures, or parcels of land satisfies the combined requirements as designated in this title, provided: Satisfactory legal evidence shall be presented in the form of deeds, easements, leases or contracts to establish the joint use; and copies of the deeds, easements, leases or contracts are placed on permanent file with the City. _��inr cgress is ri<>t proposed f<�r tl�is de��el<�rtne�it. This standard does nor appl�-. Required Walkway Location On-site pedestrian wallc«�ays shall comply with the following standards: Walkways shall extend from the ground floor entrances or from the ground floor landing of stairs, ramps, or elevators of all commercial, institutional, and industrial uses, to the streets which provide the required access and egress. Walkways shall provide convenient connections between buildings in multi-building commercial, institutional, and industrial complexes. Unless impractical, walkways shall be constructed between new and existing developments and neighboring developments; :1s sl�o«�n on the site plan, «�alk��-a��s ctitcnd from thc ground floor entranccs c�n thc cast and�vest sides of tlie building to an etisring side�valk alc�n� Walnut Street. This side�valk contiects the site to surroundin� residcntial uscs. Within all attached housing (eacept two-family dwellings) and multi-family developments, each residential d�velling shall be connected by walkway to the vehicular parking area, and common open space and recreation facilities; '1'his crircri<�n is n<>t ap�licablc to this proposal. Wherever required walkways cross vehicle access driveways or parking lots, such crossings shall be designed and located for pedestrian safety. Required walkways shall be physically separated from motor vehicle traffic and parking by either a minimum 6-inch vertical separation (curbed) or a minimum 3-foot horizontal separation, except that pedestrian crossings of traffic aisles are permitted for distances no greater than 36 feet if appropriate landscaping, pavement markings, or contrasting pavement materials are used. Walkways shall be a minimum of four feet in width, exclusive of vehicle overhangs and obstructions such as mailboxes, benches, bicycle racks, and sign posts, and shall be in compliance with ADA standards; "1'here arc no required �valkwa}•s crossing �-ehicle access dri�re�va�-s or rarkin� lots. '1'his standard does not a�pl��. � Required walkways shall be paved with hard surfaced materials such as concrete, asphalt, stone, brick, etc. Walkvvavs may be required to be lighted and/or signed as needed for safery purposes. Soft-surfaced public use pathways may be provided only if such pathways are provided in addition to required pathways. �1'he aj�plicant states that walk��a�-s �vill be pa�-ed �vith concrete and will ha��e sufficient lightuig according t<� thc subinitted lightin�plan. Access Management (Section 18.705.030.H): Section 18.705.030.H.1 states that an access report shall be submitted with all new development proposals which verifies design of driveways and streets are safe by meeting adequate stacking needs, sight distance and deceleration standards as set by ODOT, Washington County, the City and AASHTO. I�1�� .1ss<>ciatcs �re�arcd a '1'raiis��<�rtarioii Impact .liial��sis, ciatcd �iil�� ?11U7, f<�r nc� j�r�>l�<�sccl de��el<>�ment. '1'he proposcd j�rc�ject n�ould add 9 ��ehicle trips_in thc:1i�I pcak hour and 16 �-ehicic trips iii the Pi�i peak hour. Tlie e�i�iuecr srates tliat diis additional tratfic combined ��-ith futurc backgrourid trattic �rc��vth �vith the stud�° area �v<nild uc>t ha�•c a significant operatic�nal iui��act at anS� of the stud�� inters�ctions during the �eak peri<�ds analt-zed. .�11 stud�� intersections w�>ulci mecr the Cin's uitersection �I'V'I�&It 1�'.U.N l"I'ti'f.A'I'i U\ ((:l'I'20U7-U0003) I'.A c�I( 1-4(1I�33 1?/I?/1)? I'l'�RIJ<; I lI�:.U21'�(� ti l'.AI�I�IZI?I'()IZ'I"f()'I'l ll�. I il�:ARlti(�ti OI�I�I(:I�:lt performance standards durin�cach c>f the peak periods anal}•zed. Suj�plemental Dri�-c��-a�- Sight Distance Information, datcd No�-ember 29, ?llU7, ��•as also submitted b�- DKS .lssociates. '1'he posted s�eed along tlus section ��f Walnut titreet is 3l1 mph. I I��-e�-er, the 85t1i percentilc spccd on \X/alnut titrcet in the ��-estbound direction is 4U mph and is 43 mph in the eastbound direction. "1'herefore, �(1�1 Eeet of sight distance is required from the proposed �vcsterl�� dri��ewa�• to tlie east. Based on field mcasuremeiits taken on No�-cmbcr 13, ?UU7, therc is 3911 fcct�of si 7ht distancc a��ailable from tlie esumated location of the westerl�� dri�-e�va}� looking east. :1ca>rdin� to t�ie engineer, there is a short�vood fence tliac crcatcs the sight distancc c�bstructi�n. If a porti��n of the fence is remo�-ed there would be �O5 feet of sight distance a�-ailable which would meet the sight ciistance requirement. If the fence c�bsrrucrion is rem��-ed, then a shed �ti�ill create the si�ht distance obstn�ction at 4l)5 feet. If the dri�-er's e�-e is m�>�-ed to eiglit feet from the curb (instead of the reyuired ten feet from the curb) then tlicrc �vould he �lO feet of sight disrance ��idiout mo�-ing the fence. "1'hc arailable sight distance to the ��-esr is approtimatcl�� 8l)ll feet, diereb�- mceting the standard. The applicant shall, as recommended b�� DI�S .lssociates, work with the adjacent propern� owner to remotTe a portion of the �vood fence located approlimatel�• 55 feet east of the �roject site to obtain a minimum 4(1(1 feet of sight distance fmm the proposed westerlt� drivcwa}'• ��pon complerion of the �ublic impro��ements and prior to the final buildiiig inspectiori, the applicant's engirieer s11a11 submit a final sight distance certificatioti for th< <��sterl�� dri�-ewa�•. Section 18.705.030.H.3 and 4 states that the minimum spacing of driveways and streets along a collector shall be 200 feet. The minimum spacing of driveways and streets along an arterial shall be 600 feet. The minimum spacing of local streets along a local street shall be 125 feet. '1'he project proposes threc access/e�ress pouits on Walnut Street. The eastei-�itn<>st access point is for emergency� rehicles and fire station emplo��ees onl��. The center drive�ua�� is for emergenc5� ��elucles exiting the site onl�� and would be controlled b�• an emergenc�� ehicle traffic si�,mal. The western dri�-e�Ua�� will pro��ide acccss and egress for�•isitors and e�it onl�- for fire stauon emplo��ees. Walnut titreet is classif ed as a Collector c�n the Cih� of 7'i�ard's 1'ransportarion S��stems Plan. Tlus reyuires a ininimum 200 foot spacing standard. "I'his standard cannot be met and�ser�•e the needs of the fire station, therefore the applicant has applied for an adjustment to the spacing standard in accordance ��•ith 18.37(l. FINDING: '17ie access, egress, and circularion srandards arc met. ENVIRONMENTAL PERFORMANCE STANDARDS—CHAPTER 18.725: Requires that federal and state environmental laws, rules and regulations be applied to development within the City of Tigard. Section 18.725.030 Performance Standards regulates: Noise,visible emissions,vibration and odors. Noise. For the purposes of noise regulation, the provisions of Sections 7.41.130 through 7.40.210 of the Tigard Municipal Code shall apply. Visible Emissions. Within the Commercial zoning districts and the Industrial Park (I-P) zoning district, there shall be no use, operation or activiry which results in a stack or other point- source emission, other than an emission from space heating, or the emission of pure uncombined water (steam) which is visible from a properry line. Department of Environmental Qualiry (DEQ) rules for visible emissions (340-21-015 and 340-28-070) apply. Vibration. No vibration other than that caused by highway vehicles, trains and aircraft is permitted in any given zoning district, which is discernible without instruments at the property line of the use concerned. Odors. The emissions of odorous gases or other matter in such quantities as to be readily detectable at any point beyond the property line of the use creating the odors is prohibited. DEQ rules for odors (340-028-090) apply. I'V�I�&R\C'.U.�l'�l'ti I'.A�I'1()N (�:l'I'3(H)?-(1(xlf)3� i'.Ac�I�: I�(>I�33 12/]7/07 Pl'RI.I(: 111{.ARI?�(; til'.U�I�lil:I'()R"I'�f(��I�I II�: I II(.Uil\(;S OI�I�I(:I•:R Glare and heat. No direct or sky reflected glare, �vhether from floodlights or from high temperature processes such as combustion or �velding, �vhich is visible at the lot line shall be permitted, and; 1) there shall be no emission or transmission of heat or heated air which is discernible at the lot line of the source; and 2) these regulations shall not apply to signs or floodlights in parking areas or construction equipment at the time of construction or excavation vvork othenvise permitted by this title. Insects and rodents. All materials including wastes shall be stored and all grounds shall be maintained in a manner which will not attract or aid the propagation of insects or rodents or create a health hazard. Thc applicant srates the I;nt-ironmental Performance Standards ��ill be met. I�uring the neighborhood mecting a neighbor asked about noise from the fire truck sirens. "I'he res��nsc�vas that sirens ar� uscd �vhen ir is necessan' t<> mo��c rraffic out of the �va�-. With au emergenc�- si�,�ial on Walnut Strect, sirens are not necessar�� as the tn�ck elits thc site. :�ftcr 111 �.m. '1�'P&R tries to use thcir sirens as lictle as possible and onl�- use�lights. 1'rasli «ill be collected and storcd as to not attract rodents a�id i�isects. No od<>rs, glarc, c>r visible emissions are anricipated from the use. '1'herefore, tlus standard has been met. 1�'INllING: Based on the information pro��ided b�� the applicant, the use of the propern• will conform to the abo��e requirements. If for some reason the abo�-e standards �vere in question, and it was subsequently found that the use was out of compliance with an�� of the above standards, the properh- o��-ner �vould be subject t�> c��dc cnf�n-cement, c�>urt re�-ie��, possible fines, and re�-ocation <>f the Conditional l-sc Pcrmir. LANDSCAPING AND SCREENING—CHAPTER 18.745: All landscaping shall be installed according to accepted planting procedures. The plant material shall be of high grade, and shall meet the size and grading standards of the American Standards for Nurberg Stock (ANSI Z-60, 1-1986, and any other future revisions). Landscaping shall be installed in accordance with the provisions of this title. "I'he accepted plantin� pr��cedures are the �;uidelincs described in the '1'i}�,ard "1'ree 1��lanual. '1'hcse �uidelines follo�v diose set forrli b�� the tnternaric»ial Societ�� of.�rboriciiltirre (iS,�1) rree �lanring �uie3elines as ��ell as die standards sct forth in the :�merican Insritute of.�rclutects'.�rclutectural Gra�luc Standards, 1Oth cdirion. In the .�rc�utccniral Grapluc Standards there arc �;uidelines for selecting and plantui� trees based on the soil �-olume and sizc at mahiritt•. _�ddirionall�•, thcrc arc dirccrions for soil amcndnicnts and modificauons. Certificates of occupancy shall not be issued unless the landscaping requirements have been met or other arrangements have been made and approved by the Ciry such as the posting of a bond. 1'he applicant is pro�osing to retain si� �>ut of se�-cu trecs o�-er L" ll.B.I I. '1'lus represents 85°�o retenrion of trees o��er 12". Therefore, the��am not rcyuired to mirigate and/or�ost a bond per Tigard 1�luiucipal Code�. Howe��er, die applicanr is claiming that tree 2 is e�acd�• 12", and thercfore not subject ro miti�;ation requirements. I'he applicant's tree surve}• should be accurate to the nearest .1 uiches in order to demonstrate that a tree is exactlj- 12". If a reassessment is not made, then tree 2 should be subject to mirigation. rinall�-, eaen if trec 2 is subject t<� nuri�;ation, then 6 of 8 (75°�0) trecs �vill be retained. Z'herefore, the applicant�vill nc�t ha�-c rc> initi�arc ari��-a�-. Existing vegetation on a site shall be protected as much as possible. The developer shall provide methods for the protection of existing vegetation to remain during the construction process. The plants to be saved shall be noted on the landscape plans (e.g., areas not to be disturbed can be fenced, as in snow fencing�vhich can be placed around the individual trees). '1'hc applicanr's plan sct docs not slicnv trec �rotecrion for thosc trccs t�> rcmain diiring c<>tisrrucrion. I'lcasc ha�-e the aj�plicant �re�are a tree protection sheet as part of theu �lan set. '1'lie tree protecri�>n sliect sh��uld follo�v the �r<>ject arborist's recommendations, and uiclude a si�,niaturc c�f a��ro�-al from the ��roject arborist. ��ppro�-ed metl�ods ��f�mtection arc ��utlined und�r the Tree Remo��al secric>u <>f tlus report. 'l�'I'&R1��.AI.�l'�I'til�.A'll(�\ (r:l'P300?-(xIIN13) P\(�I{ IG(�1�33 13/1'/0?Pl'lil.11:I II�:.Utl\(� �'1'.11�1�Itl�.l'()R'1"l�()7'►II{ I II�:.ARI\(�S OI�I�I(:I{lt Street trees: Section 18.745.040 states that all development projects fronting on a public street shall be required to plant street trees in accordance �i�ith Section 18.745.040.0 Section 18.745.040.0 required that street trees be spaced between 20 and 40 feet apart depending on the size classification of the tree at maturiry (small, medium or large). '1'hc sitc fronr's on ��'alnut Strcct, a �ublic smect. Street rrccs arc rcyuired. "1'hc a��plicanr has proposcd ro plant �aqucmonrii I3ircli (Bcnila jaclucmc»itii). �X/hilc tl�is trcc is n<�t on thc "1'i�ard strccr trcc list, the Cih� ,�rb�>rist lias a��ro��cd it for tlus project. '1'hese trees are considercd "mediuin-sized" atid are s�accd 3O feet a�art. "1'his critcrion has bccn mct. Land Use Buffering and Screening: Buffering and Screening is required between different types of land uses. Residenrial uses abut thc properh- o�i the east arid �vest. WaLiut Street is to the south,aiid �ack Park is to die riorth. Based on the Buffer �Iatrit (I'able 18.745.1), iio buffer is reqUired benvecn residential uses and emer>enc}� ser�-ice uses, but a landscape buffer is reyuired benveen parking lots �nd residenrial uses (com�inarion C). 'I1�e a�plicant states that oprion C-1 has been chosen. 'I'his combinarion requires a 10-foot «�idc landscapc buffer��itl� a mir- of trees, slirubs and a 4-foot hedge. 'I'he proposed trees, Ra��vood .1sh, are mediun�-sized trees and can be spaced 3(1 feet apart as proposed. '1'he landscape plan shows a hedge and planrings, but the buffer is onl}' 8-9 fcct in width. 'i'lus does not mcct the staiidard. Screening: Special Provisions: Section 18.745.050.E requires the screening of parking and loading areas. Landscaped parking areas shall include special design features which effectively screen the parking lot areas from view. Planting materials to be installed should achieve a relative balance between low lying and vertical shrubbery and trees. Trees shall be planted in landscaped islands in all parking areas, and shall be equally distributed on the basis of one (1) tree for each seven (7) parking spaces in order to provide a canopy effect. The minimum dimension on the landscape islands shall be three (3) feet wide and the landscapin� shall be protected from vehicular damage by some form of wheel guard or curb. Parkiii� arcas �vill bc screcncd from nei�;hboririg properties aloii�; the site's eastern boundary. 'I'he ap}�licant has also proposed scrccnin�; along the parking areas to thc wcst of the fire station. 1'recs arc prc��osed at a ratiu of�ne tree fc>r c�-er�� 7 Parkin r spaces. The dimcnsions of the landscape islands are 8.5 wide and 1�.5 ]c�ng and �vill be protecred from ve�iicular traffic by a curb. Screening Of Service Facilities. Except for one-family and tvvo-family dwellings, any refuse container or disposal area and service facilities such as gas meters and air conditioners which ��vould othenvise be visible from a public street, customer or resident parking area, any public facility or any residential area shall be screened from viea� by placement of a solid �vood fence or masonry wall between five and eight feet in height. All refuse materials shall be contained within the screened area; 1�he applicant states that a rooftop �1/C unit will be screened fr<>m �-iew, but no detail was �i�-en of thc proposed screcning. Plans sho�v a generator on the north side of the building that�vill be enclosed b�� a G- toot wall, with fiiush materials to match the building. ,� gas meter is shown on the utilih� plans thar will be screcned 1�� prop�>sed landsca}�iu�;. 'I'his standard can be met conditionall�•. Screening Of Refuse Containers. Except for one- and tvvo-family dwellings, any refuse container or refuse collection area which would be visible from a public street, parking lot, residential or commercial area, or any public facility such as a school or park shall be screened or enclosed from view by placement of a solid vvood fence, masonry wall or evergreen hedge. All refuse shall be contained within the screened area. .1u enclosed refiise collectioii area is pr<>��<>sed �»7 the nortli sid� of the building. It will be screened b}' a 7- foot�voodcn fcncc and a shnibber�� buffcr. ]�INDING: "I'he landscapvi�;and screei�ig standards are ncrt full�-met,bur can be as condirioned below. '1'�'I�BcR 1��.A I.ti l�"1'�I'.A�I�l()i� ((:l'P3011--(N)fNl3) I'.A(�I�: 1�()1�33 12/17/U7 Pl'lil.l(: 111:.AIZI'Vc; Sl'.U�I�Rlil'OR'I'"1'O'1'ill�:III{.Utlti(�SOI�I�ICI?R CONllI'1'IONS: • Pri<�r to sitc �vork the a�plicant shall submit a rc��iscd sitc plan for rc��ic��- and ap�ro��al that sho�t-s a butfer along the eastern �arkuig lot that meets the standards of "1'able 1 H.7452 (l�uffer reyuirement"C"). • Prior t<� the issuaiice of builduig perinits, the ap�licant shall submit a screenin�; detail plan for thc rooftop air condirioncr. MIXED SOLID WASTE AND RECYCLABLES STORAGE —CHAPTER 18.755: Chapter 18.755 requires that new construction incorporates functional and adequate space for on- site storage and efficient collection of mixed solid�vaste and source separated Recyclables prior to pick-up and removal by haulers. The applicant must choose one (1) of the follou�ing four (4) methods to demonstrate compliance: Minimum Standard, Waste Assessment, Comprehensive Recycling Plan, or Franchised Hauler Revie�� and Sign-Off. The applicant will have to submit evidence or a plan, which indicates compliance with this section. Regardless of �vhich method chosen, the applicant will have to submit a written sign-off from the franchise hauler regarding the faciliry location and compatibility. '1'hc a��licant has choscn thc minimum standards method to meet the requirements. �1 sign off lctt�r from Pric�c llisposal ��•as submittcd. C<>nditional appro�-a1 v�-as �i�-cn. Location Standards. To encourage its use, the storage area for source-separated recyclables shall be co-located with the storage area for residual mixed solid vvaste; Indoor and outdoor storage areas shall comply with Uniform Building and Fire Code requirements; Storage area space requirements can be satistied with a single location or multiple locations, and can combine both interior and exterior locations; Exterior storage areas can be located within interior side yard or rear yard areas. Exterior storage areas shall not be located vvithin a required front yard setback or in a yard adjacent to a public or private street; Exterior storage areas shall be located in central and visible locations on a site to enhance security for users; Exterior storage areas can be located in a parking area, if the proposed use provides at least the minimurn number of parking spaces required for the use after deducting the area used for storage. Storage areas shall be appropriately screened according to the provisions in 18.755.050 C, design standards; The storage area shall be accessible for collection vehicles and located so that the storage area ��ill not obstruct pedestrian or vehicle traffic movement on the site or on public streets adjacent to the site. Non-residential buildin s shall provide a minimum storage area of 10 square feet, plus: (1) Offlce: 4 square feet�1,000 square feet gross floor area (GFA). (2) Retail: 10 square feet/1,000 square feet GFA. (3) Industrial: 6 square feet/1,000 square feet GFA. (4) Institutional: 4 square feet/1,000 square feet GFA. (5) Other: 4 square feet/1,000 square feet GFA. l:mergcnc�� ser�-ices fall ��-itliiii the "Utller" categom for calculatin�; required storage area. .1 building of 11,H8? syuare feet must pro�-ide 57.58 square feet�of storage area. .� sitigle elterior, 2O0 sc]uare foot, st<�ra�;e area is proposed behind the building outside the rear��ard setback. 'I'he locadon is ��isible to users, but is screened b�- a �vooden fcnce and shrubber�-. The storage area is not located �aithin a parking lot and ��ill n<�r im�ede on-site or off-sitc traffic. Design Standards. The dimensions of the storage area shall accommodate containers consistent �vith current methods of local collection; Storage containers shall meet Uniform Fire Code standards and be made and covered with waterproof materials or situated in a covered area; Exterior storage areas shall be enclosed by a sight-obscuring fence wall, or hedge at least six feet in height. Gate openings which allow access to users and haulers shall be provided. Gate openings for haulers shall be a minimum of 10 feet wide and shall be capable of being secured in a closed and open position; Storage area(s) and containers shall be clearly labeled to indicate the type of materials ��n�t��.��r��.��r��i�� <<:t'��3uo?-ou�io3� i�.��;��: is<��i I?/1'/(1� I'l'lil.l(:I fl�:.AKI\(� ti'1'.Ai'I�RI?I'(1R�1�7Y)�I'I II•:I II:.ARI',�(;ti(�I�I�I�:I�J2 accepted. "1'he storage area has been dcsigned to lccommodate contauiers consistcnt �•ith current methods of local collectiori. Coritauiers ��ill be labeled appropriatel�•, and the area meets l�ire Code standards. '1'l�c a�j�licant states that appropriate gate �>pcnin�;s «-i11 be pro��idcd. 'I'hc Pride Disposal ser��ice pro�•ider letter stated concerns on die proj�osed bi-fold �ate d�sign. 'I'liis ma�- not allo�v the gat�s ro be secured and Pride recoinmends 10' gates ��-itl� cane bolt 1�>ck-backs in the open posirion, as ��ell as closed. Detailed plans subinitted ro the Citt- sho��- s�ti-iiig�ates �vith drop pins in the open arid cl�>scd Positions. The gate operiing is 2O fcct. 'I'his standard has been met. I�INDING: Based on the anal�-sis abc»�c, the standards for mi.�ed solid �vaste aiid rec��clable storage area met. � OFF-STREET PARKING AND LOADING (18.7G5� At the time of the erection of a new structure within any zoning district, off-street vehicle parking will be provided in accordance with Section 18.7G5.070. ,1 u�umum of 3.0 spaces is required fc>r c�-en• 1,OOI) fect of btulding square f�otage associated �vith c:mer�;enc}� sei-�-ices. 'I7ie proposed Uuilcii�i�; is 11,882 square feet, but 7�i7 syuare feet is for a commutiih� room, arid 4,392 square feet is for the fire apparatus ba�-. 1'he applicant based calculatioiis on the emergene�- sen�ices use for 11,882 square feet. :� more accurate�calcularion �vould consider both the hre starion and communit�-room uses aiid riot inclucic the fire apparatus baj�. I:acluding the ba}�, the square footage of tlic fire starion is 6,723 syuare feet. I3ased ori the standards in TaUle 1H.7G5.2, the minimum parking rccluired is 21 and the matimum allowed is 31 (4.5/1,000). Communitt� rcx�ms are not classified in the table. "I'he mosr sirnilar use is Social/T�raternal Clubs/Lodges. �'sing tlus classificarion the minimum is 10 and the maaimum is 14. Combuung both uses give a total required minimum of 31 and a matimum of 45. '11ic applicant proposed 3) spaces which meets both inuumum and maaimum standards. Access drives from the street to off-street parking or loading areas shall be designed and constructed to facilitate the flo�� of traffic and provide maximum safery for pedestrian and vehicular traffic on the site; The number and size of access drives shall be in accordance with the requirements of Chapter, 18.705,Access, Egress and Circulation; :lccess standards are rnet as discusscd utider the .�ccess, Lgress arid Circulatio�i section of tlus report. Access drives shall be clearly and permanently marked and defined through use of rails, fences, walls or other barriers or markers on frontage not occupied by service drives; '1'he de��elc�pment plans sho« aceess dri�-es defined b�� concrcte curbirig. 'This crit�ri<�n is satistled. Access drives shall have a minimum vision clearance in accordance with Chapter 18.795, Visual Clearance; 'I'lie applicaiit has indicated tlie �•isioii clearaiice triaiigles for all three dri��es on thc plans. '1'lus standard is met. Access drives shall be improved with an asphalt or concrete surface; '1'lie applica�it has proposed to pa��e the access and all parking arcas. '1'his criteri<�n is satisfied E�:cluding single-family and duplex residences, except as provided by Subsection 18.810.030P, groups of tvvo or more parking spaces shall be served by a service drive so that no backing movements or other maneuvering vvithin a street or other public right-of-way will be required. .�111 �arkin� areas are sen-iced b�� an access dri�-e that all�>��s adequate maneu��ering on-site and does not rcyuire backin�;into a street. 'I�his criterion is satisfied. Loading/unloading driveways: I'V'f�&1t�Y'.U.1�'l�'I'ti'I'.A'1'IOV' ��:1'I'?00?-00(�3) I'.Ac�l; 19(11�33 12/17/07 I'l�Bl.l(:I II{.ARl:�(; ti'1'.U�I�RI�:I'(>R�1��l'(1�l�l II:I11{.UZI'VGti O1�1�1(:IiR A driveway designed for continuous forward flow of passenger vehicles for the purpose of loading and unloading passengers shall be located on the site of any school or other meeting place �vhich is designed to accommodate more than 25 people at one time. Per the traffic engineer's rrip generation data, the communin� center is anticipared to hold on a�•eragc appro�imatel�� 1 S peo�le Uased on its sir.e. "1'he meetin}; roc�m is not elpected to accommodatc more thari ?5 peo�lc at <�nc rimc. '1'his srandard is not aj�plicablc. Parking Lot Striping: Eacept for single-family and duplex residences, any area intended to be used to meet the off- street parkin� requirements as contained in this Chapter shall have all parkin� spaces clearly marked; and all interior drives and access aisles shall be clearly marked and signed to show direction of flow and maintain vehicular and pedestrian safety. Thc applicant lias indicatcd tliat dic parkiug lor�vill be stripcd aiid that iritcrior dri��cs and acccss aislcs �vill bc properl�� signcei to show the direction of mo��ement. No details were given to sho�v how thc eastern entrance-onl�� driee will operate. Duectional signs were mentioned iri the Sign section of r�ie iiarrative, but izo detailed drawin rs �vcre gi�ren. �� ate in thc western �arking area will prevent visitors fronz accessuig thc rcar of tllc buil�i�ig. '1'his criterion can be inct as conditioned below. Wheel Stops: Parking spaces along the boundaries of a parking lot or adjacent to interior landscaped areas or sidewalks shall be provided vvith a wheel stop at least four inches high located three feet back from the front of the parking stall. The front three feet of the parking stall may be concrete, asphalt or low lying landscape material that does not exceed the height of the wheel stop. This area cannot be calculated to meet landscaping or sidewalk requirements. "I'he mii�num latidscape percenta�e is ezcerded. Coiicrete curbuig �vith car ��-erhangs are allo�ved in lieu of�vl�eel stops. Irregardless, the applicant has proposed concrete �vheel stops in the �arking area. This standard has becn mct. Space and Aisle Dimensions: Table 18.765.1. outlines the minimum dimensions for angled parking. "1'he site plan shows a total of 39 nc�� spaces utilizing 90-degrec parking. Staff re��iew of the site plan illustrates compliance �vith the reyuircments of 18.7G5.N. "1'he aisle �vidth bet�veen stall lanes for 90- degree angle parkin� is at least 28 fect. "1'hc nuniinum aisle �vidth required for t�v<�-��-a�- traffic is 24 feet. Proposed orie-«•a�� access dri�-es are 28 and 3�� feer�ti-ide. This criterion is satisfied. � Minimum Bicycle Parking Requirements: The total number of required bicycle parking spaces for each use is specified in Table 18.765.2 in Section 18.765.070.H. .1 n�-umum of.5 spaces is required for e��er�� 1,0OU feet of building square footage associated�vith emergenc�- ser��ices aiid 2.0 for ever5� 1,000 squarc feet for the communih- room. :1 total of G spaces are mquired. Sit spaces are�rovided. This standard is met. FINllING: :�n entrance onl�� dri�re for fire trucks and employ-ees is �rc>�<�sed on the east sidc of the building, but no signage is proposed to con��e}' the desired flow of traffic. CONDi"1'ION: Yrior to the issuance of bLiilding permits, the applicant shall subriut plans for re�riew and appro��al to crisurc that traftic flow is clear to all users. SENSITIVE LANDS (18.775� The developinent site includes areas of drainageways and associated wetlands. Development of sites that include these areas requires review through the sensitive lands criteria as described below. "I'he site c<mtains hUO tt-pes of sensiti�•e lands; drainage�ti�a��s and wetlands. The proposal is to collect and treat storm�cater before releasing it into rhe �vetlaiid buffer (�regetated cc�rridor). The ��-ater «-i11 then flo�v I'V'I�&li\r�.11.i�l'�I�ti'I�.A�1't<)?�((:l'N2007-00003) I'.A(�I�:30()I�33 12/I'/0? I'l!1�1.1(: III�:.U21N(� tiC.AI�I RI�:POR"1'"1'O"I'lll�:lll?-ARI?�(;tiOFI�I(:I?R o��erla�id iiiro lirucgcr (:rcck. Onl�� the �-egctatcd a�rrid<�r .ir<>urid rlic creck aiid �vetlatids is bcin� dircctl�- impacteci b�• dic cie��cl�>pment. The ��egetated corridor is re�ulated b�� CWS and tl�c al��licant has recei�red approval fc�r the �r�>posal from CWS. ��ccording to the CWS tien�ice Pro��ider I.etter the ��e�;etatcd corrid�>r is in dc�;radcd condition. Thc lettcr was rc-issucci after nc� applicant re��ised }�lans that included trenchin�;�virhin the �vetlands. Both letters were submitteci �vith the application. No �v�>rk is pro�osed �vithin thc drauiagewa�•; therefore no sensiti��c lands pertnit is necessan'. Work �tiithin the �vetlaud buffer does tequire a '1'�•pe II sensiti�-e lands pernut. "1'he applicant li�s ap�lied for thc permit and addressed thc relatii-e critcria. The proposed land form alteration or development is neither on �vetland in an area designated as significant wetland on the Comprehensive Plan Floodplain and Wetland Map nor is within the vegetative corridor established per "Table 3.1 Vegetative Corridor Widths" and Appendix C: Natural Resources Assessments" of the CWS "Design and Construction Standards", for such a wetland; 'I'he subjecr sirc contains arcas desi�,mated as si�nificant �ti�ctland on the Comprehensi�-c Plan l�lc>odplain and Wetland 1�1a� aiid a ��egetati��e corridor of 5O-8O feet fr�m the ed�;e of the wetlaiid. '1'lic ��egetati�-e corridor for this wctland is a CWS water qualin� buffcr and is not subject to the safe harb<�r pro��isions of Goal 5. No work is pro�osed �vithin the significant �vetland. The extent and nature of the proposed land form alteration or development will not create site disturbances to an extent greater than the minimum required for the use; 'I'hc majorin• of sitc �vork is located outside of the buffer and thc applicant has rc�-iscd �rc�-ious plans to eliminate an�- disturbance of the significant ��etland. 'I'his �roject does not propose am� land form alteration or�de��elopment �vithin the area designated as a si�,niificant wetland. The apprc��-ed CWS plan sho��s 28G s9uare fcet of mitigation near the south��est corncr<�f the site. Any encroachment or change in on-site or off-site drainage which would adversely impact wetland characteristics have been mitigated; The area within thc ��c�;ctatcd corridor that is disrurbcd to install the stormwater outfall �il�c will Uc restored tc> esistin�conditions after the�vork is completcd. Where natural vegetation has been removed due to land fotm alteration or development, erosion control provisions of the Surface Water Management program of Washington Counry must be met and areas not covered by structures or impervious surfaces will be replanted in hke or similar species in accordance with Chapter 18.745, Landscaping and screening. ��s srared abo��e, die area of disturbance will be restored after amstruction is complete. No tree rem<��-al is proposcd �vithin thc scnsitive lands. All other sensitive lands requirements of this chapter have been met; "I'he pro�osed �roject also in�-ol�-es drainage�va��s �vluch ha��e been addressed �vithin this staff report and found to meet the applicable criteria. The necessary U.S. Corp of Engineers and State of Oregon Land Board, Division of Sate Lands, and CWS approvals shall be obtained. Onl�- a (:��'� sci-�-ice pr�>�-ider letter ��-as needed for this proposal. �� cop�� has becn pro��ided with thc ap �icatioii. '1'he Dc�arttnent of State Lands ��as pro�-ided a cop�� of the proposal. Commetits recei��ed iYi�icate no conccrris fc�r the proposed acti�-in�. The provisions of Chapter 18.790,Tree Removal shall be met; 'I'�vo trecs are bcing rem<>�-ed from the site, but thesc are uot ��•ithin nc� sensiti�re lands. '1'he trec remoral requirements are met. 1'V'I�&It\1'.11.Al"I'ti'I'.A"1'1(>ti ((:�'P3(x)'-�UO(13� I'.1<�I�:?1 �>1�33 1?/1?/0, I'l'H1J(:I II?.AKIN(; Sl'.U�I�RI�:I'()R'I"1'()'I'I II�:I II�:.ARII�'(�ti l)I�I�I(:1?R Physical Limitations and Natural Hazards, Floodplains and Wetlands, Natural Areas, and Parks Recreation and Open Space policies of the Comprehensive Plan have been satisfied. 1'V'I��It�V'.A I,I�l'�'I'ti 1'.A'I'I()� ((:l'Y200'-(x)O(13j P.Ac�I�:??()I�33 12/1'/I)?I'l�li1J(: III�:.AItl'�(� ti7�.AI�I�KI�.POR'I"1'O'I'III�:III�:.UiINGtiOI�I�I(:I?12 'I'he pro�osed de�-elopment plan addresses thesc rlan ��licies. '11ie majorin� of the sensiti�-e ama on the �roperri- �eill remaui in its narural stat�. The Com�rehensi�-e Plan and Comprchcnsi�-e Plan 1�1aj� �uidcs de�-clo�incnt throughout the Cin• of "I'igard and is iui��lcrncnted throu�h rlic lle�•clopment C<>de aiid 'Lonin�; �'�Ia�. '1'herefore, this standard is satisficd. f��INllIN(;: 13ased c>n t�ic analt-sis ;ib��-c, rl�c scnsiri�-c lands criteria arc mcr. SIGNS�18.780� Requires that a permit be issued for any sign that is erected, re-erected, constructed, structurally altered, or relocated within the Ciry Limits. 18.780.130 states that no sign of any character shall be permitted in an R-7, R- 4.5, R-3.5, R-2 or R- 1 zone except for non-residential uses, one illuminated or non-illuminated freestanding sign not exceeding six feet in height and 32 square feet in area per sign face for uses approved under the site development review or conditional use process �vill be permitted. Wall signs may not exceed five percent of the gross area of the wall face on which the sign is mounted. One, i11ui1unated, Ereestanduig si�n is proposed �cith this application. "1'hc area is 1G.5 square fect �er face (33 sc uare feet total). 'The sign is illununated b�� t��o �;round mounted lights. Placcmcnr of the sign is outsi�c tlie �-isual cleaxance areas. � I�INI�ING: "l�lic criteria for si�iis lia�•e been met. TREE REMOVAL—CHAPTER 18.790: Section 18.790.030 requires that a tree plan for the planting, removal and rotection of trees prepared by a certified arborist be provided for a condrtional use application. �he tree plan shall include identi6cation of all existing trees, Identification of a program to save existing trees or mitigate tree removal over 12 inches in caliper, identification of which trees are proposed to be removed, and a protection program defining standards and methods that will be used by the applicant to protect trees durin� and after construction. :1s reyuired, the applicant submitted a trec: plaii conductcd b�� Ra�- �f�-er, a certified arborist. �Io�ve��er, «-hile the rc�c>rt contains the four reyuired components, tl�e applicant lias not transferred the information to rheir plari set (sec comments below under protectiori program). Plan requirements. The tree plan shall include the following: Identif cation of the location, size and species of all existing trees including trees designated as significant by the ciry; The .�rborist Report idenrified the location, size and specics of all e�isting rrees, consistent with tliis standard. Identification of a program to save existing trees or mitigate tree removal over 12 inches in caliper. Mitigation must follow the replacement guidelines of Section 18.790.060D, in accordance with the following standards and shall be exclusive of trees required by other development code provisions for landscaping, streets and parking lots: a. Retention of less than 25'%� of eaisting trees over 12 inches in caliper requires a mitigation program in accordance v��ith Section 18.790.060D of no net loss of trees; b. Retention of from 25`%� to 50'%� of existing trees over 12 inches in caliper requires that two- thirds of the trees to be removed be mitigated in accordance with Section 18.790.060D; c. Retention of from 50'%� to 75'%� of existing trees over 12 inches in caliper requires that 50 percent of the trees to be removed be mitigated in accordance with Section 18.790.060D; d. Retention of 75% or greater of existing trces over 12 inches in caliper requires no mitigation. '1'hc applicant is ��r<>�<>sin r t<� retain si� c>ut <>f sc�-cu tr�es �>��cr L'" D.B.I I. "1'his re�resents 85°�� retention of trccs o�-ex 12". '1'hcre�ore, thc�� are not rcquired tc> ilutigate and/<>r �c>st a bond �cr Tigard �luriicipal l'V'I�&12��'.U.'�l'"I'ti'I'.1�1'I()?� ((:l'�I"OO7-OfN103) P.A(�I�:23(11�33 1�/17/07 Pl!RI J(: I II{.ARI'.VC; �1�.U�1�IZlil'(1R'I"I'()"I'I II(I II�:.ARIN(;ti OI�I'I(:I�.R Codc. I Io�vetrer, tlie applicant is claimin�; tliat trce 2 is e�actl�- ]2", and thereforc not subject to mitigatic�ti reyuiremeizts. T►ie a�plicant's tree sun-c�� should bc accurate to the nearest 1 inches ui ordcr r<� demonstrate thar a rree is etactl�- 12". If a reassessment is nc�t inade, then tree 2 should be subjecr to miTi�ation. � I�iiiall��, e�-en if tree 2 is subject to rnitigation, then 6 of H (75°��) trces ��-ill bc retained. '1'lierefc>re, thc a��licant�vill not lia��c to mitigate a�i�-��-a�•. Identification of all trees which are proposed to be removed; .�ll of the trees proposcd to be rcmo�-cd are idenufied ou the pr�>l�osed trec plan found within the arborist re�ort. A protection program defining standards and methods that will be used by the applicant to protect trees during and after construction. 'i'l�e applicant's plari set docs not slio�v tree protection for those trecs to remain during cotistrucuon. "1'lie applicant must prepare a tree protection sheet as part of dieir plan set. '1'he trcc protection sheet should follo�� the pro�ecr arborist's recommendations, and iriclude a signature of approval frotn tlie project arUorist. .�11 trees to be �resen�ed that «-ill bc in close proyirnin� to c�msrruction acti�-ities shall be protected �vith ti��c c>r six (5' - G') foor high chain link fences. Please lia�-e the aprlicant demonstrate «-hich trecs will be }�rc>rectcd �virh �lastic and «-hich �vill be Protected ��-ith chain link. f�ences are to be mounted on t�s�o incli diameter gal�-anized iron posts, dri��en uito tlie ground to a dcpth of at least 2-feet at no moxe than 1O-foot spacing. The applicant sliall position fencuig as directed b�� tl�e project arborist to protect the trees tc� be retained. The ap�licanr shall allo�v access b�- the Cit�• �.�rborist for the purpose of monitoriu�; and i�ispection of the tree �rotection to ��erif�� that the tree prorecrioii measures are performing adeyuarel��. f�ailure to follo�v the �lan, or maintain tree protection fencing in the designated locarions shall be �;r��urids for immediate suspension of �vork on the site until remediation measur�s and/�>r ci��il citations can be �rocessed. .��u�� tree that is located on propert�� adjacent to the construction project that �vill ha�-e more than 15°�0 of its �root s��stem disturbed by constructi<>n acri�-ities shall also be sho�vn on tlie plans, and adcyuatcl�� rotccted. Section 18.790.040 states that any tree preserved or retained in accordance with this section may thereafter be removed only for the reasons set out in a tree plan, in accordance with Section 18.790.030, or as a condition of approval for a conditional use, and shall not be subject to removal under any other section of this chapter. The properry owner shall record a deed restriction as a condition of approval of any development permit affected by this section to the effect that such tree may be removed only if the tree dies or is hazardous according to a certified arborist. The deed restriction may be removed or will be considered invalid if a tree preserved in accordance with this section should either die or be removed as a hazardous tree. The forrn of this deed restriction shall be subject to approval by the Director. .1 condirion of appro�-al��-ill ensure that this standard is met. FINDING: I3ased on the anal��sis abo�-e, the Tree Remo�-al standards ��•ill be met, if the applicant com�lies �vith the conditions listed belo�v: CONDITIONS: ♦ Prior to commciici�ig site�uork, thc ap�licaiit sliall subinit cc�nstruction drawings to botli Planiii�i�aiid 1�:ngineering that include: _1. Protcction nzcasures for all trces ro be retain�d on-site including street rrec s. B. .\ note prohibiting eyui}�me�it, ��ehicles, mac}iiner��, �;radin�, dum�ing, I'V�I�&R\C'.U.Al"l'til'.1'l'I()N (l:UP2o0�-nou1�3� I'\c�l�.'?-1()I�33 13/I�/0?PURI.I(:I II i.1Rl'V<� ti"C.U�I�RI?1'()R'1'7'()7'I II�: I 11�:_AKlti(�S OI�I�I(:I?R storage, burial c�f debris, <�r anj� other co�istructioii-related activities in an�- tree protecTion zoi�e; and C. .� note statin�; that onl�� thosc trees identiticd on thc approved Trce Rcmo�ral �lan arc audi�>rizcd for remo��al b�� tliis re��rt. N�hvithstanding anc othcr �r<>�-ision of this titic, an�� parri' �c�tuici tc> bc in �-iolation of tlus chapter [18.7911� �ursuant to Cha�ter 1.1G <�f the '1'i�ard 1�lunicipal Code shall be subject to a ci��il �eiialri� of up to �SUU and shall be rcyuired to remed�� aii�� damage caused b�� the �-iolation. Sucli remediation shall iiiclude, biit not be lirnited to, tlie follo�uing: 1) Replacement of unla��-full�- remo��ed or dama�;ed trecs in accordance �vith tiection 18.79�.�G0 (D) of the Tigard De��el��mcut Code; and 2) Pa��meirt of an additional ci�-il penaln• representin� the estimated �•alue o� ant� unla�vfull�- remo�-ed or damaged tree, as dercrinined using the most current Intcrnational Socien- of .-�rboriculture's Guide for Plant��ppraisal. ♦ Prior to commencing site work, the applicant shall establish fencing as directed b�- die project arborist to protect the trees to be retained. '1'lic applicant shall call for an inspection and allo�v access b�� the Cin� 1lrborist for thc j�urpose of monitoring the tree protection to verif�� rhar the tree protection measures are perfortning adequatelt•. � ♦ "I'he applicant shall haae an on-�oing responsibilin� to ensurc that the Project �lrborist lias subrnirted writtcn reports to the Cin� ��rborist, at least once e�-ert� tu�o �veeks, as the Project :1rborist monitors the consmictioti acti��ities from iiutial tree protection zonc (TP'I_) fCi1C111� II1Stallat1011 througli tl�c buildiiig construction �hases. The reports shall e��aluate the condition and location of the tree protection fencing, determine if an}� changes occurred to the "I'P/, and if am� part of the Tree Protection Plan has becn ��iolated. If the reports are not subinitted to the Cin- .�rborist at the scheduled inten-als, and if ir ap�ears the '1'1''L's or the Tree Protection Plan are not bein� followed b�• thc contractor or a sub-c<�nrracror, the Cih� can stop work on the project until�an inspection can be dorie bt� the Cin� .�rborist and the Projcct ;lrborist. Prior to issuaticc of anv Certificates of Occupanc}�, die Project .�rborist will submit a final certificatioti iiidicating die elemenCs of tl�c Trec Protection I'lati werc followed and tliat all remaiiiiiig trees on the site are health��, stable, and viable in their modified growing em�iro�iment. ♦ If�vork is required within an established tree protecdori zone, tlie project arborist shall prepare a proposal detailing the construcrion techniques to Ue em�lo��ed and tl�e likel�- impacts to the trees. I'he proposal shall be re��ie�ved and appro��ed b�� thc Cin- ��r�orist before proposed work can proceed ��ithin a tree �rotection zone. 1'he Cin� .-lrborist ma�� reyuire changes prior to appro�-al. "1'lie project arborist shall be on site while work is occurriiig witliiri the tree prorecuon zone and submit a summar�� report certifi�in� that tlic work occurred �er the proj�c�sal and �t-i11 not significantl�- irripact the health and�or stabilih• of the trees. ♦ Prior to issuance of buildirig permits, thc applicant (devcloper or builder) shall: .1. Submit site plan drawings sho�ving the accurate location of the trees that ��ere preser�-ed, thc location of rree protection fencin�;. I3. Submit a statement arid sigriattire of appro�-al from a certified arborist regarding building 1I7(� infrastrucrure sitin� rechniyues t� be cmplo�-ed ui construction�ti-irh respect to an�� rotected trecs on site. ♦ Prior to fmal building inspection, tlie applicant sl�all record a decd restriction to the effect that an�- esisting tree �;reater than G inclies diameter uia�� be r�mo��ed onl�• if rhe tree dies or is hazardous according ro a certified arborist. �"I'he deed resrriction mar- be remo�-ed or��•ill be cc�nsidcr�d int�alid if a tree �rescn•ed in accordance v��ith this decision should either dic ��r bc rcino��ed as a hazardous tree. ♦ Prior to final building ins�cction, thc applicant shall submit a summary of the 1'��I�&R�V�.0\l'�l�ti I',A�l'I()'�' ((:UP200?-f)0003) I'.A(�I�:SOI�33 1?/1?/t)' I'l�lil J(; I II�..11ifN(� SI'.U�I�RI(I'UR7'7'()'l'I II�: I il�:.AItIN<;ti OI�I�I(:I(R bi«�eekl�� arboris� reports prepared b�- the Pr�>jcct :lrborist. '1'he summar�- sliall document the effect ��f the appr�>�-ed rree ]�r<>tection plan, account for ari�- �-iolations, and ccrtifi� thc cc�nclitic�n �>f��r<�tcctcc3 tires. VISUAL CLEARANCE AREAS—CHAPTER 18.795: Section 18.795.020.A. states that the provisions of this chapter shall apply to all development including the construction of new structures, the remodeling of eaisting structures and to a change of use which increases the on-site parking or loading requirements or which changes the access requirements. Section 18.795.030.B. states that a clear vision area shall contain no vehicle, hedge, plantin , fence, wall structure or temporary or permanent obstruction (except for an occasional utiliry po�e or tree), exceeding three feet in height, measured from the top of the curb, or where no curb exists, from the street center line grade, except that trees exceeding this height may be located in this area,provided all branches below eight feet are removed. "1'he applicant has addressed ��isual clearancc standatds within the narrari<<e and triangles are sho��-n <>n �hc plans at each dri�°ewa}-. No structures are�roposed witl�i the�-isual cicarance areas. I�INDING: Based on the anal�•sis ab�>�•c, dic��ision cicararice standards ha�-e been met. STREET AND UTILITY IMPROVEMENTS STANDARDS CHAPTER- 18.810: Chapter 18.810 provides construction standards for the implementation of public and private facilities and utilities such as streets, sewers, and drainage. The applicable standards are addressed below: Streets: Improvements: Section 18.810.030.A.1 states that streets within a development and streets adjacent shall be improved in accordance vvith the TDC standards. Section 18.810.030.A.2 states that any new street or additional street width planned as a portion of an existing street shall be dedicated and improved in accordance with the TDC. Minimum Rights-of-Way and Street Widths: Section 18.810.030.E requires an arterial street to have a 64 to 128-foot right-of-way width and varied paved section. Other improvements required may include on-street parking, sidewalks and bike«�ays, underground utilities, street lighting, storm drainage, and street trees. '1'his site lics adjacent to SW Walnut Street, ��hich is classified as a Collector on the Cin• of '1'i�ard 'I'ransj�ortation Plan �fap. _�t present, there is appro�imatel�• 35 fect of ROW from centcrline along most of the frontage, according to the most recent tax assessor's map. The applicant should dedicate the additional ROW to provide 35 feet from centerline at the cast and ��est ends of the propern� frontage. SW Walnut Street is currentl�� iinpro�red to approYimatel}' 22 feet from centerline �vith a 5 foot plaiiter stri� and �i foot sidewalk. Street Alignment and Connections: Section 18.810.030.H.1 states that fiill street connections with spacing of no more than 530 feet bet�veen connections is required except where prevented by barriers such as topography, railroads, freeways, pre-existing developments, lease provisions, easements, covenants or other restrictions existing prior to May 1, 1995 which preclude street connections. A full street connection may also be exempted due to a regulated water feature if regulations would not permit construction. Section 18.810.030.H.2 states that all local, neighborhood routes and collector streets which abut a development site shall be extended within the site to provide through circulation when not precluded by envitonmental or topographical constraints, existing development patterns or strict adherence to other standards in this code. A street connection or extension is precluded when it is not possible to redesign, or reconfigure the street pattern to provide required extensions. Land is considered topographically constrained if the slope is greater than 15`% for a distance of 250 feet or �I'\I�&IZ\C'.AI,At'�I�ti 1�.1"11()V ((:l'P2(Nl'-0(N)(13) I'.A(�I•:2G OI�33 1'_/I?/0,Yl'RI J(:I[1?.UZI\(� ti 1'.U�l�IZI:I'()il�l�7�O�1'I II•:I lI�:.Utl'�(;ti OI�I�I(:I•:lt more. In the case of environmental or topographical constraints, the mere presence of a constraint is not sufficient to show that a street connection is not possible. The applicant must show why the constraint precludes some reasonable street connection. I'V�I��R\C�.U.I�l'7'�1'.A"I'1()\ ((:l'1"IN)�-(xNH)3j I'-A(�I{'?-()1�33 1'_/1�/0-PUHI.I(: I II�:.Utl'�(� ti'l'.AI�I�RI�:I'()R'1"f()'I�I II�:I II�:.AItl\(�ti O1�1�1(:I{R �1'hcrc arc no o�portunitics for street connections thr<>ugh this d��cic>pmcnr duc t<� strcams and (:ir�� ark l�t�a�. Block Designs - Section 18.810.040.A states that the length, width and shape of blocks shall be designed �vith due regard to providing adequate building sites for the use contemplated, consideration of needs for convenient access, circulation, control and safety of stteet tra�c and recognition of limitations and opportunities of topography. Block Sizes: Section 18.810.040.B.1 states that the perimeter of blocks formed by streets shall not exceed 1,800 feet measured along the right-of-way line except: . Where street location is precluded by natural topography, wetlands or other bodies of water or,pre-existing development or; . For blocks adjacent to arterial streets, limited access highways,major collectors or raikoads. . For non-residential blocks in which internal public circulation provides equivalent access. Section 18.810.040.B.2 also states that bicycle and pedestrian connections on public easements or right-of-ways shall be provided when full street connection is not possible. Spacing between connections shall be no more than 330 feet, except where precluded by environmental or topographical constraints, existing development patterns, or strict adherence to other standards in the code. N�> new blocks <�r strects are being pro_osed �vith tliis de��elopment �1 j�edestrian connection across I�ruc�;cr Crcek ��•ill be �rop<>scd, if possib�e,��ith futurc clpansion �>f�ack Park t<> nc� north. Sidewalks: Section 18.810.070.A requires that sidewalks be constructed to meet City design standards and be located on both sides of arterial, collector and local residential streets. Private streets and industrial streets shall have sidewalks on at least one side. 1'here is an e�isting sidewalk alon�Walnut Street, thereb�� mcetin�; this criterion. Sanitary Sewers: Sewers Required: Secti�n 18.810.090.A requires that sanitary sewer be installed to serve each new development and to connect developments to existing mains in accordance with the provisions set forth in Design and Construction Standards for Sanitaty and Surface Water Management (as adopted by Clean Water Services in 1996 and including any future revisions or amendments) and the adopted policies of the comprehensive plan. Over-sizing: Section 18.810.090.0 states that proposed sewer systems shall include consideration of additional development within the area as projected by the Comprehensive Plan. '1'liere is an elistiii�; 8 iiich pixblic sewer line iri S�X�' �X�aliiut Street. "1'he ap��licatit's plans indicate rhe�• �vill install onc sanitar�• se��-cr lateral to ser�-e the de��elopinerit. Storm Drainage: General Provisions: Section 18.810.100.A requires developers to make adequate provisions for storm water and flood water runoff. Accommodation of Upstream Drainage: Section 18.810.100.0 states that a culvert or other drainage faciliry shall be large enough to accommodate potential runoff from its entire upstream drainage area, whether inside or outside the development. The Ciry Engineer shall approve the nccessary size of the faciliry, based on the provisions of Design and Construction Standards for Sanitary and Surface Water Management (as adopted by Clean Water Services in 2000 and including any future revisions or amendments). The sitc is adjacent to Iirue�er Creek,��-hich acconitnodates upstream draina�e. �I'V'I�&R\K'.U.�l'�l'�l'.1�1�1(�'� (�:l'N3(1(1?-ou003) I'.AGl�:'?8(>I�33 13/1?/0?Pl'H]J<: III�:.1KIti(� �I'.U�I�RI?P(>R�I��I�<�'I�III[I�I�:.ARlti(;tiOI�I�I�:I�.R Effect on Downstream Drainage: Section 18.810.100.D states that where it is anticipated by the Ciry Engineer that the additional runoff resulting from the development �vill overload an existing drainage facility, the Director and Engineer shall withhold approval of the development until provisions have been made for improvement of the potential condition or until provisions have been made for storage of additional runoff caused by the development in accordance with the Design and Construction Standards for Sanitary and Surface Water Management (as adopted by Clean Water Services in 2000 and including any future revisions or amendments). In 1997, (:lean Water Ser��ices (CWS) completed a basi�i stud�• of ��anno Creek and adopted the f�ann�> Creek �X/atershcd 1�lanagemenr Plan. Section V' of thar pla�z includes a recommendation that local go�-ernments institute a srortn��ater detention/effecti��e imper�-ious area reducrion program resulting in no net increase in stc�rm reak flc��vs u� ro the 25-��ear e��enr. 'I'he Cih� �vill require that all ne�� de��el��ments resulting in an increase of im�er��ious surfaces pro��ide onsite detention facilities, unless the de�-elopment is located adjacent tc> f�anno Creek. For those de�-elopments adjacent to I�anno Creek, the srorm �ti-ater runoff�vill be permitted to discharge �vithout detention. The applicant's �laris indicate tlic�- will coustruct an on-site detentiori pond upstream of I�rueger Creek. The sue storm�cater runoff �i-ill be collected, detained in the pond and then released into the wetland buffer before flowing c��-crland into Krueger Creek. Bikeways and Pedestrian Pathways: Bikeway Extension: Section 18.810.110.A states that developments adjoining proposed bikeways identified on the City's adopted pedestrian/bikeway plan shall include provisions for the future extension of such bikeways through the dedication of easements or right-of-way. SW Walnut �treet is a desi�;�iated bicy�cle facilirv. '1'he bicy�cle striping and markings are alread�� i�i place. '1'he applicarir shall replace all stripin� and markin�s renzo��ed or damaged duruig construcrion of the three dri��e��ati�s. Utilities: Section 18.810.120 states that all utiliry lines, but not limited to those required for electric, communication, lighting and cable television services and related facilities shall be placed underground, except for surface mounted transformers, surface mounted connection boxes and meter cabinets which may be placed above ground, temporary utility service facilities during construction, high capaciry electric lines operating at 50,000 volts or above, and: • The developer shall make all necessary arrangements with the serving utiliry to provide the underground services; • The Ciry reserves the right to approve location of all surface mounted facilities; • All underground utilities, including sanitary sewers and storm drains installed in streets by the developer, shall be constructed prior to the surfacing of the streets; and • Stubs for service connections shall be long enough to avoid disturbing the street improvements when service connections are made. Exception to Under-Grounding Requirement: Section 18.810.120.0 states that a developer shall pay a fee in-lieu of under-grounding costs when the development is proposed to take place on a street ��here existing utilities which are not underground will serve the development and the approval authoriry determines that the cost and technical dif5culry of under-grounding the utilities outweighs the benefit of under-grounding in conjunction with the development. The determination shall be on a case-by-case basis. The most common, but not the only, such situation is a short frontage development for which under- grounding would result in the placement of additional poles, rather than the removal of above- ground utilities facilities. An applicant for a development ��hich is served by utilities vvhich are not underground and ��hich are located across a public right-of-way from the applicant's property shall pay a fee in-lieu of under-grounding. '1'here arc esistin�; <��-crl�cad utilin• lines alon� thc fr�mta=c <�f SW Walnut Street. If the fee in-lieu is approved b�� the Cin� 1�,n�ineer, it is equal to �35.1)(1 p�r�ineal foot of street frontage that contains thc o�-erl�ead lines. 'i'hc frontage along tlus site is 4G5 lincal feet; tl�crefore thc fee «•�uld be �1G,275.(1U. "1'V'I�&It\C'.AI,til"1'S'l'.1'I'I<)1� (�:l�l''_'(107-00003j P.A(�I•:29()I�33 12/17/U7 Pl'lil,l(: I 11{.1R11�'(� ti'f.AI�I�RI?P()R"1'�1'()'l�l II:I II[.U21'V(�ti OI�I�1(:I?R ADDITIONAL CITY AND/OR AGENCY CONCERNS WITH STREET AND UTILITY IMPROVEMENT STANDARDS: Traffic Study Findin�s: I�I�� .�ss��ciates ��repared a 1'ransportation Impact :1na1�-sis, dared �ul�� ?I1(17, for the propos�d dc�-cl<�pmciit. '1'he proposed project��rould add 9 �-eliicle trips�in tlie .11�1 j�cak hc>ur a�id 16 �-chicle trips in tlie Pi�1 peak hour. 1'he engineer states that this additional traffic combiiied �cith future backgrowid traffic gro�vth with the stud�� area would not ha�-e a si};nificant operational impact at an�� of the studt� intersections during the peak periods analt-zed. .�ll studt• intersections would meer the Cit}''s intersection performance standards during each of the peak periods anal�-r,ed. The engincer identificd se��eral transportarion mitigations for the proposed project. Based on the operations anal��sis conducted for the proposed project, no off-site deficiencies �vere identified. Project rclated on-site mitigation measur�s include: 1) an emergenc�- ��ehicle traffic signal is recommended at the prc�posed central dri��ewat• on S�� Walnut Street; 2) relocate the west access approrimatel}� 10 feet to the �vest ro ali�n �vith the residenual dri�-ewa�� across SW Walnut titreet to reduce potcnrial conflicts betuueen ��eliicles tur�iiu� left into diesc dri�-e�va��s; and 3) there are significant speeding issues c�n Waluut Street, ��itli the 85th percentile speed at more than 10 miles an hour hi>hcr than the posted speed. 7'raffic cahning methods such as increascd speed limit enforcement shou�d be im�lcmentcd to reduce ��ehicle specds and potcntial safcn•issucs. The a�plicaiit shall install ari etnergene�-eelucle traffic signal at tlic cetitral drivewa�' on SW Walnut Street. "1'lic sigtial shall be o�eratioiial prior to fu1a1 building inspection. '1'I�e ap�licant shall revise the construction plans to relocate the ��-esr access approlimatelt- lU fe�t t�� nc� west to ali�n with the residenual driveway across SW Walnur Strcet � Fire and Life Safetv: "1'ualatin �'alle�� I�ire aiid Kescue submitted comments on No��ember 2�, 2007. "1'he fire district�vill do the ��orksliect atic� calculate the required fir� flow. "1'he firc h�-drant on the north�vest corner of the SW WalYiut Street a�id SW 1?�th .1��criue meets the h��drant distancc reyuircment. 'I'hree fire ht�drants are required for this project The fire h��drant sho��rn on thc subrnitted drawings across SW �Y�alnut�Street from the subject pxoperti� does not contribute to the required nuinber of fire h�-drants because tiW Walnut is a collector. � .-�n addiuonal fire h��drant must be installed on the north side of SW Walnur Street and the east side of the west access dri��e to accommodate the fire de_artment connecrion. With the installation of this fire h��drant, the required number of fire h}•drants w�be satisfied. Tlie applicant shall meer these conditions as outlined in the November ?�O7 memo and re��ise thc construction plans accordingl��. Public Water System: '1'l�e Cin� c�f 'I'igard pro��ides serviee in this area. There is an eristing ublic �vater main located in SW VG'alnut �titrcet. 'I'he a��licant's plans sho�v t�vo water line taps. l�iese water lines do not require easemenrs wit�iin the public R(�W. 71ie applicant's plans shall be re��ised t<� accominodate the comments recci��cd from 11'1�&K rc�arding fire h�-drants. Storm Water Qualit� The Ciry has agreed to enforce Surface Water Management (SWM) regulations established by Clean Water Services (CWS) Design and Construction Standards (adopted by Resolution and Order No. 00-7) �c�hich require the construction of on-site �vater qualiry facilities. The facilities shall be designed to remove 65 percent of the phosphorus contained in 100 percent of the storm water runoff generated from ne«�ly created impervious surfaces. In addition, a maintenance plan shall be submitted indicating the frequency and method to be used in keeping the faciliry �I'V�I�&lt\C�.AI\l'�I�ti l�.A�Il()'� ((:l'I"_fNl'-fxlO03; I'.A(�I�:3O OI�33 1_'/1?/O7 I'L'lil.l(; I II:.11t1�'(�� ti'l�.AI�I�RI�:1'()R'I"fO'I'I II(I II:.Utlti(�ti(�I�I�I(:I•:lZ maintained through the year. I'rior to constructi�>n, the a�plicant shall subnut plans and calculations for a water yualin' faeilin� thar ��-i11 meet the intent of rhe CW� llesi�n Standards. In addition, the applicant shall subinit a mairiteiiance plari for the facilin� rhat must be re�-iewed and appro��ed b�• the Cin°prior to construction. To ensure comj�lianee ��-ith Clca�i Water Sen-ices design atid constructi�>n standards, the ap�licant shall emplo�• the desigti engi�iecr responsible for tlie design and specifications of tlie pri��ate ��ater yualitc facilin• to perform construction and �•isual obser�ration of the �vater qualih• facilin� for c<�m�liance ��-itli tlie desi�n and specificatiotis. 'I'hese i�ispections shall be made at sig�uficant srages tlir��ughout tlie project and at completi<�n of the co�istruction. Prior to t1na1 building inspection, the dcsi�;n e�igirieer sliall pr<>�-ide tlie Cin- of "1'i�;ard (Irispectiori Super�-isor) ��-itl7 �vritten confirmation diar the a-ater yualin� facilin- is in com��liance ��-ith The ciesi�n and sj�ecificarions. � Grading and Erosion Control: CWS Design and Construction Standards also regulate erosion control to reduce the amount of sediment and other pollutants reaching the public storm and surface water system resulting from development, construction, grading, eacavating, clearing, and any other activity which accelerates erosion. Per CWS regulations, the applicant is required to submit an erosion control plan for City review and approval prior to issuance of City permits. The Federal Clean Water Act requires that a National Pollutant Discharge Elimination System (NPDES) erosion control permit be issued for any development that will disturb one or more acre of land. This permit will be issued along with the site and/or building permit. Address Assignments: "T'hc Cin- of'1'i�ard is res�onsiblc for assi�;ning addresses for parccls within the Cit�• <�f'1'igard arid �vithiu the Urban Sen�icc B<�undar�� (l'S13). ��n addressing fee in the amount c>f �5�.�0 per address shall be assessed. '1'his fee shall be �aid to the City prior to issuance of the Site Permit. l�or multi-tenarit buildiri rs, one address number is assigned to the building and theii all tenant spaces arc gi��cu suite numbers. 'I�i� Cin� is res�orisible for assigning the main address and suite numbers. "1'his iiiforniation is needed so that building pernuts for tenant improvements can be adcc]uatelti• tr�cked in The Cih's permit tracking system. Based upon informauon pro��ided by� the applicant, rliis building will be a inulti-tenant building. Pri��r t<� issuance c�f the site permit, the applicant shall pro��ide a suite la�•out niap so suite numbcrs can be assi�ned. "1'he addressing fee �vill then be calculated based upoii tlic number c�f suites thar must be addresscd. In multi-le�-cl structures, ground le��el suites shall ha��e numbers j�receded b�- a "1", scc<>iid le�-cl suires shall ha��c nuinbers preceded b}� a "2", etc. D. IMPACT STUDY (18.390� Section 18.390.040.B.2.e states that the applicant shall provide an impact study to quantify the effect of development on public facilities and services. For each public facility system and type of impact, the study shall propose improvements necessary to meet Ciry standards, and to minimize the impact of the development on the public at large, public facilities systems, and affected private property users. In situations where the Community Development Code requires the dedication of real property interests, the applicant shall either specifically concur with a requirement for public right-of-vvay dedication, or provide evidence that supports that the real properry dedication is not roughly proportional to the projected impacts of the development. The applicant has submitted an impact study addressing the required elements above. The report substantiates that all services are capable of serving the site. 'i'he applicaiit l�as subnuttcd an im��act srud�� adeiressing the required �lements ab��re. '1'he re�ort substantiates that all ser�-ices are ca�able of sei-��ing the site. Storm water collcctcd froni the site will be directed to a �vater yualin�/dctcnti<�n facilih� bcfore beirig rcleased into tl�ie �vetland buffer. '1'h�re �vill be no impact on thc �ublic storni s�-srem. Warer and sanitar�� is ]�ro��ided b�° connecting to a existin� liiics ui Walnut titreet. Because tlie project is n<�t residential, �arks �uill not be impacted. �1'V'I�&R�Y�.U.'�l'"1'�l'.A"17()'� ((:l'P200�-(I(xN)3) l'.A(;I{31 (�I�:i3 1'_'/1?/0'Pl'k�LIC I II?.U21'�(; ti7'.U�I�RI{P()R'I"f(>�l'l ll{I II�..ARI'�(�ti OI�I'If:l{R ROUGH PROPORTIONALITY ANALYSIS liascd <�n a trans��>rtarion im�act stud�- prcpared b�� ir. Da�-id Larscm for tl�c :1-13<n� 1�.��ansi�>n/l��,lan II/Res�>luti�>n 95-G1, "1'I1�'s are etpected to recapture 32 percent of the traffic impact of new dt��-elopment on thc Collectc>r aiid �lrterial Strcet s��stem. Based on the use arid the number of ne�v parkirig s�aces propc>scd, tl�c applicant is rcquired to pa�- TIT's of appro�imatel}• �5,21)l.l)I). '1'his cstitnatc is based solel�' on pcak lic�ur��ehicle tri}�s. f�irial TII� pa��ment will be assessed at time of buildin�;pernut submittal. Based oii the cstimate tliat total I'IT fees co��er 32 percent of the impact o�i inajor strect im�rovements cih�wide, a fec that �vould co�°er 1OO percerit of tlus projects traffic itnpact is �1(,25:i ($5,2O1 di��ided b�• .32). "I'he difference bet�veen the TIF paid, and the full impact, is considered the urimiti�;ated impact on th� street s��stem. Waltiut �vas recentlt- impro��ed througli a Cin'�Countp project, so no iinprovements are reyuired at�rhis time. .1n additional 5 feet of right-of-��-a�- must be dcdicated at both ends of the site to be 35 fect from centerline; the total is appro.r-imatel�- 50 feet. The estimated �-alue is $3.0(1 a square foot�vith a total ��alUC of 51511.f)O. 'I'l�e unmitigated impact from the proposcd de��elopment is $1(1,9(12 (1G,253 - �5,2O1 - �15O). '1'he dedicarion is tequired to meet the current nununum standards and is roughl�- pro�ortionatc t<� thc impact of the proposal. SECTION VII. OTHER STAFF COMMENTS The City of Tigard Building Division has re�-ie�ved the j�roposal and cc>mmented about tlie pri��ate st<>rm, sanitar�- ser�-icc, «-atcr scn-ice, and grease traps. '1'hese issues «-i11 bc re�-ie�ved b�• the I3uilding l�i��isic>n duriti�;permir rc��ic��•s. � The City of Tigard Engineering Department�vas scnt tlus proposal for re��ie«� aiid the comments ha��e bccn inc��r�c�rarccl inr�, this rc�c>rt. Ciry of Tigard Police Department has re��iewed this aj�plication and has no objections. Tigard Public Works con7mented that hS-drants and meters are tc� be located within landscaped areas, If the c�isrin�; sci-�-ice is rclocated, then the de��elc�per�vill be billed f<>r the cost. SECTION VIII. AGENCY COMMENTS Tualatin Valley Fire and Rescue (TVF&R) has re��ie�ved the �roposal and offercd thc following commc nts: "I'ualatiti �'alle�� }�ire 8c Rescue endoYSes tliis proposal preciicated <>n the followiiig criteria �tnd conditions of a�pro��al: � 1) COMMERCIAL BUILDINGS - REQUIRED FIRE FLOW: 1'he required fue flow for the buildulg shall not etceed 3,000 gallons per minute (UPl�� <>r tl�� a��ailable GP1�1 in the water delivery� s��stcm at 2O psi, �vhichever is less as calculated using IFC, ��ppendi� I3. .� worksheet for calculating tfic rcquircd firc flow is a��ailable from rhe Fire �Zarshal's Office. (If�C B1(15.2) The fire district will do the worksheet and calculate the required fire flow. 2) FIRE HYDRANTS — COMMERCIAL BUILDINGS: ��'I�ere a ��c>rric>n ��f thc buildi�i� is more rliati 4U11 fcct from a li��drant on a fire apparatus access road, as mcasurcd iii an a�pro��cd route around rhe c�tcrior c�f rhe building, on-site fire h�-drants and mai�ls shall be pro�-ided. '1'his distance ma�� be increased to Gl)(1 fcet for buildings equipped throughout �vith an appro�-ed automatic spririkler s��stem. (TI�C 5(�8.5.1) � The fire hydrant on the northwest corner of SW Walnut Street and SW 124th Avenue meets this distance requirement. I'V'I��IZ�K'.U.'�l"I'S'I�.A�I�I()N ((:UI''?00'-00003j I'.A(;I�:32 OI�33 1?/I?/U?Pl'RIJ(:I II�:.Utl'�(� tif.AI�I�RI?P()R�I��1'O�1'I II�:I II�:.V2lN(�S O1�1�1(:I�.R 3) FIRE HYDRANT NUMBER AND DISTRIBUTION: "I1ie muuinum number and ciistriburion of tirc h��dranrs.��aiLlblc r<>a biulciing shall n<rt be less than that listed ui�ppenditi C,'1'able C 1�5.1. Considetations for placing fire hydrants may be as follows: • 1�.sisting li�•dranrs iii thc area ma�� be uscd to mect thc rcc]uired number of l��draiirs as a�pro�-cd. H�-drants that are u]�� to 6UU fcct a��a�- from tlic tlearest point of a subject building that is protect�d ��itl� fire sprinklers ma��contribute ro tl�e required number of �l�-ar1��r�. � • I I�•drarits that are se]�arated from the subject builciing b�� railroad tracks shall not contribute to thc rec�uired nuniber<�f h�•drants unless a��rc>�-ed b�- the fire code official. • 1 I}'drants that are Separatec3 from the subjcct buildin� b�� dii�ided lii�h��a}'s or freewa5�s skiall n<�t contribute to the rec�uired number of h��drants. ��ea�-il}' tra��eled collector streets onl}' as appro�-ed b�� tlic tlre code official. • I1�-drants thlt are accessible onl�� b�- a bridge shall be acccptable t<� contribute to the reyuired number of h�-drants <�nl�• if appro�-ed b�- the fire code official. Three fire hydrants are required for this project. The fire hydrant shown on the submitted drawings across SW Walnut Street from the subject property does not contribute to the required number of fire hydrants because SW Walnut Street is a major collector. FIRE HYDRANT/FIRE DEPARTMENT CONNECTION: :1 firc h��drant shall be located �vithin 100 fect of a fire department connection (I�llC). I�ire h�-drants and I�llC's shall be located on thc same side of the fire ap��ararus access roadwa��. I�llC's shall normall}- be remote eacept when ap�ro�•ed b�• tl�c firc codc ofticial. (ll�C 91?2) An additional fire hydrant must be installed on the north side of SW Walnut Street and the east side of the west access drive to accommodate the fire department connection. With the installation of this fire hydrant, the required number of fire hydrants will he satisfied. 4) ACCESS AND FIRE FIGHTING WATER SUPPLY DURING CONSTRUCTION: .A��ro�-ed fire apparatus access road�va}-s and fire fi�liting «-ater supplies shall be uistalled aiid c�perational �rior to an�� combustible construction or storage of combustible materials on the site. (IFC 14111.1 & 141?.1) Department of State Lands andcipates no ad��erse effects from the proposed }�roject. Portland General Electric, Northwest Natural Gas Company, Comcast Cable, Verizon and Qwest Communications ��crc gi�-en the opportunin- to re�-ic��- this proposal and submitted no comments or <>bjccri<ms. December ll), 2OO7 PRI�:Y:11Zf:I� B�': Chcr��l Caines D.1"I'E :lssociate Planncr 'l'�'l�ttlt�V'.U,'�U'l'�I',�'I'I(�V' ((:l'I'2oo7-oor)o3j �>.�c��:33()��33 12/1?/(I' I'l'RI.I(:fll?\121'�(� til'.U�I�Rl{POR'I"I'O'l'llli III�:.ARI'�(;S(>I'I�I(:I�.R I Depending on the number of people wishing to testify, the Tigard Hearing's Officer may limit the j amount of time each person has to speak. We ask you to limit your oral comments to 3 - 5 minutes. The Hearing's O�cer may furthet limit time if necessary. Written comments are always appreciated I'i by the Hearing's Ofticer to supplement oral testimony. AGENDA ITEM NO.: 2.1 DATE: DECEMBER 17, 2007 PAGE 1 OF FILE NAME: TUAI.ATIN VALLEY FIRE & RESCUE STATION 50 i C_�SI�: ?�TOS.: CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT (CUP) 2007-00003 SENSITIVE LANDS REVIEW (SLR) 2007-00004 _�D USTMFNT AR) 2007-00036 SI� PERMIT (�G1� 2007-00171 IF YOU WISH TO TESTIFY ON THE ITEM INDICATED ABOVE, , � PLEASE PRINT YOUR NAME, ADDRESS & INCLUDE YOUR ZIP CODE � PROPONENT OF APPLICATION OPPONENT �F APPLICATION - (Spealang In Favor or Neuttal)- - (Speaking Against)- Name,Address,Zip Code and Phone No. � Name,Address,Zip Code and Phone No. � �� p�-d�� '�, � . � I ��' ��' s w' ,��.r�tE �ir�� w� , � ��c �-c��►��L.� J`° �� %�?"'�`�I— — — — — Name,Address, ' Code and Phone No. � Name,Address,Zip Code and Phone No. ,�B.v�/� �.��'�lL1� �� r� �� ,�3 ��d.-��'syl �-T—��!��( � � >��,a3 � I Name,Address,Zip Code and Phone No. _I Name,Address,Zip Code and Phone No. 1 I 1 Name,Address,Zip Code and Phone No. I Name,Address,Zip Code and Phone No. I I � II i � Name,Address,Zip Code and Phone No. � Name,Address,Zip Code and Phone No. I 1 I I� — — � � — � — � — � — � � � � � � � � � � — � � I, Name,Address,Zip Code and Phone No. � Name,Address,Zip Code and Phone No. I I 1 � — � — � — � — � — � — � — �I— � — � — � — � — � — � — � — � I �_ � i � � O K�I[�C�I1IC�� J� � '-AND USt PLANNING • iRANSPORTAT10N PLANNING • PROJECT MANAGEME ! ��c:CClllh�t' � �. ��)(17 I-leacin��. Ot�ticc;r C'it� ot��l i�ai-d 1>1?5 tiW flall Bl�d. �Ci�ard. Orcz��n �7�'?� RE: TVF&k Walnut �treet Station: CUP 2007-00003 �I�h� applic;int is iil ��neral a�r�;ement ��ith the Staff Report for the above application but would request clariiicati��i� on unc: ��t�the lin�lin�s anci the associated conciition �f approvaL The specific findin�, is fi�und on pa�� ?(� �,f�U ��f thr Stat1�Repc��rt and states: .."l�hc-r•c� cr1•c� c.��isiinK u��c�rh��ucl tr�ilin�linc�.�� ulnjag�he�i•urticrRc� of�Sl��' Wulni�t ,S'lreei... .. The Staff R��e�rt then cc�ntinuc, to rrquir� either under�rounding of the utilities or payment of a lee-iil-lieu ii�appro��ed b�� the C'it�� f�:n�ineer. �'e ��oufd like the record to retlect that there are ►�o i��erheacl ��tiliT�� lines Ic�cated al��n� thr sitc"s fi-ontage w�ith SVd Walnut Street. The attached ph��tos �h�� the frunta�e al�m�� SV�' V�"alnut and. as can be seen. there are no overhead utility lincs. Gi��en thi, lact. tht apE�li��ant woul�l rtqucst that this findin� be amended to indicate that the utiliiies ;�r� l��cated und�r��round. ,'1s �ti�11 �te ��ould mqucst that condition of approval #28 (page � ot��0) be r�mo��ed sincr it is haseel on the E�resence ot��verhead utility lines. Condition of ��p}�ro�al #?8 states: ..Thc� cr��lircm� .��hall��lurc� �he- c.�i.��ir�,��n•c�rlac�uc!tNilil�' linc�.�� ulort��,SYt� Wcrlrrt�t Street r�r7cici��ruuitc!u.�� cr��ur•< <,j��l�r.ti��rujer�. ur. i��r��j�rnrc�cl h�' lhe� ('itL'. lhe��.��hal1 puy the fc�e irt-lieu of. l(19L�C'1'�l'll1R7(�Ill��'... Amen�iiri�� tl�� tindin� an�l r�n�c��in� this c��nditi�n ��ill acc�u-ately reflect tlle existing situation al��n� th� sit�'s fi-onta�e. �l�hai�k �� ti�r ��our c��n�id�ratiun. rank .An�� c� Principal � 921 5W Washington Street. Suite 468 Portland. OR 97205 • tel 503 224 6974 • fax 503.227.3679 • ww.angeloplanning.com ��=s', "��.__��,, � �j��iT��`�;�',w�•. ._� ��lY ��.�.� �,' . •i �R fit.'+�'�y r�', r�,++s. :... •�' .iw�` �,�/ ��. t�''t`A:.•;-.. '+�� i1� ., e-'•��yti��` �.�.A►i e',.��'��j� �,+;`��-ti` �ti ;�`•.��'.,�� }��'!`,�ra�r' .,, � '1 � % � ',;,,,.�--�,r;'�a ��' .��(� � .:� �� ` i"'� � _ ':►�: '�� ,`��_i ,y .� q�y 'ri v .` . t ,. '�i � ! r l��.. . s �. � . ' . . ' . . ' , .c�. �.. . ..: . .. �. . .. .. ,: r; .��.-. - .� . {� � - F4,. �� • ` , '"�� .. . . f t r� •s � � , ^ ' �� w � � � � '. �� r � � �— � e�,� ' `�. � � " ' , �� ,� �� r� ' �+ . ry , _ �' ��'" 1�dA�+" � : �: ':. ::::� '* � . � .. . � � ,� ' .rt � __ ; _.__ _ ,� �. , . .. . > . : .. �� . , . �� ,.; . , _ _ N. , - _. r.�' 4 � `��_x .� � ✓ . , . ��5,�� " '� 'i' tirM�+ t .i��l��'�j � S d°Y``i�+� � N � `!A'S '," . �; . �^� �,.�--� �:f ,,,,;�,�..;r�4`w ��►�,� _s. ^*�., .� � , ,H.. � � . .. .x �� -� „"�,,,,-�. � ��. . ,�, : � , ��Y � �� 3�r,� � � � """'"`.,�. `-�+""..'---_`__ I •�� ', ��, ,�, �� _, �x�.,:�e, I� � _ I� � � �� ' , ,,,�, 4�:.. � � ,"�� - :�� , ..-�; f�.��. :>��. ;:��-,� ` -;J�~�W. �'.U`�y#� NS��• F.F�� :a�� -. .'.alA��I,f I a�', r . � '� v .- i , �. . ' � � r � �' l. . + . . . . � :� . . �� .-w.,. _ ' ' :1 1 � _ •t � � ` � j.•. f.#1 . , ' �. ``` x �� ....�Ilic' . .`�I}r, .:,,.,i��. .:$� . ..,,�. y " a+ _ ,� •�� . , - ,�_. . � 1` $» � ��'`i'nrc' � � �^ ' �'I ,"�"` p+� *� ,,�r. , �, . * �:, ��. .� �`w� . � �,.. . �. .`� �°,�.°. _�.!. . � _ � !.. A � ' . ' ' ,. .......... . , �. - .; •, ,.-:�,l .. . . ".,� �'�.., Y^+&q' . 'I�1.. �.. ��M�:� i"�.e i �� . . �.� . � ' � , .. - , '"' i. . �� . . . .. ' Ala�=^� » "-.� . .; ' :.n� .:_ ..�.. . d. � x g�� ,�`.�,��r"'�,.Y,�e, . ., ,: ..�� . . ..-.,,;� y�l.:.::,.. . .�. w.: : .,.a. Y, �•-•�'+i g . �� ,r . �. ,, . . . ,;,, n . ,. . .� g ,,, ;.' �� ' . . � � , . . , , , � :.._ . � .� . . , � • -.. �" �.; 1't� � ,Y,. `2 ��. . � �, '*H+,� . � . �. � . . .. i � ��s l��`y�� ,�•'M , � _��x �_,� � �c'� � , e.. w. � • , - �---�.._ � " � .� ;a � � � . �� , _ _ _ �;�� _ . , ., �, ,�,��« �� . �._ � � _ .� `` ''�`_ _ A � ?„ .� �.�,.,':'� +� ., > _ , . —.__. . -° . , �' � 1"��.. �,,��_ � ,�u� �,,,- -, ,t'-,... I „� '�► . , . '' "�y'�`+�...� �-+-t , .. '+uP.r �Y�,.. �. . �.':'[ r � ° ..I. ' , a +s,_'�:yyc : �r a � ' "'�� . 8 -,.�.., t� ..� . . �� .ayw k".;�� ..: �P�.�'J- ;�4 � � .: w.. . .. �.... . , � - ., . .. .�,; . . � . � ' . �. ��-� �. ' � K , . - . . � , . . , .. #tti��'�+r„p� .�r "�"�. . � ,:� K.. �� s� jy� �r+l .�^'u�. � .t . . - _ . .Irl .r»��.�, • .. 'r.. ..., : w� y. �. - '��y,� t-Fnr y . . ; ,. �� „� � y�.�µ ._.. I �._w�*�A.ky*�'i'� JF ^ �'ynA ��I��y��:. y�� . � � . v'�'Se � ?i � d r�} , i'$t.�}�y#,+k-.. "�M`- . . 4 � �. � �.� , �, Y � . 'i ��"3 .� •" �r3'a i��` .. . �� -n�.'�� ."i` ;_�,�y K'd-�� ;,' ..._ . '� * � .�`��'. µ r#'� . ' = -."�fl .- .Kg�. �,�'ses�� a s.� rt ,y . .. _ �u {p;F '�k'Yl�P.3� '�� _�,�i,-. . ..._ � • . ... ,..,.... . . �� . _ k . , . F -'y". — , I . i 'y . y � � .:�1�`,' .��vr �~ . i �. �. t �� a '�, .K , • 'N :� . 1 ` 1 � , , .� _ S� �� 'I ' ' :• ��. �• . r �,.� . 1 •T I � • � •��• , .� �^. "�� '�� '�� '�'� _ . . ` � • • • . '.� �n �t �) ��e1i�'�� Iw�� , 'J;.��• ;} � � ✓� I•=' •,• . ' *+��Y�- _ � .K. i� ` r - • . � ' . x.. . � ^ ' � f. ,� . .r. • - , •�+ �' 4��`� � 1'• ,-i"°*,c:.�=. ' . - .-.�` i: ,i ' 'a' I , � . . .+r : �""� � � '� ��jyl.�w+�i. � � � � � i -�. _ i / � �., �� I , . . � ; -rr �+ �vts.�r-�� _ � �� 1"4' - g _ � �' ,�.y�, , ._L� - ; � .., - , ,� _, �.a: _ - ,r:. � .,- ,. ' . y►!',[,a,' '/�r1� � �: '�- I�� . f.' ,� � .��. �r � . F`�! .. - �� r ... ,�. .� ,.�.:._ . ,�, . . -��.,- ...� .._ -. . - .. ��, . . . z' , _ . �7"'?r.L. ,. '..,.�tY:. ....� . .. �� ... .... � .,... .� -..;�:� � ;• y.�, � .. . " .. , ... . � . . _y �,�.,. .. . . . ... .. � ' . . ...�` �• . _ .. . �" � ..'�-'-� � . �� '::.e , . � . . � a '7�.w��, �� .. t� �- .. „. � ;klv � _ �� .� � � n S� �';.� ,�I^t��,J� �„7� - 4 ,. F., t�*y�+��.-,'n�w �� :t� � � � ; �r f. x a� �' ^ , � ^r�,�-�a� �i � � .,. � { "+�` �� .'r, �*"��k��,�4. _�� —. r � � .� r ' , � �- � �.�-� ,:s�, ;�+��;�-��! � � � i�EC i 7 2007 �� , " . -.rs � ,�,: C�-�(, �� -�' �✓� � O�i�.�' . J �� -�;�,��. I�� ,� t �� c-�.�.�—�� - � �P �� - �� , z aa�- y �� -� — l�� w� ,�i ' `.-�, cu,,,,►►-►..o,-,�-�,.� � ��-,-.�- �p�,cs�� • �-,�. � -�— �- �r��- �� w-� L� �1-.� c�,��, c��,.�� -+-�c�.,•�s , � 1 �— l � . -}�S — `�. —�.� ',�, �,. ��c.e. , � .�� P,v,�� 5�' �...�� C� : '�"� ��. �s�� e.s � S�1o,�j �. U�Q�'(.A Nd- C� ��- ��5�. ry�Gl� `J� (�Lll.. /V � �RS. �C��1�' . 1`fCGGv�i . � c�L.� 5� ' �- ��,�� S��t" �� d� �.►�►�C�,� � -r��-' ��m �- �°��`- � � (�''4bV1� � . l.J� ��,��- �� --� �- °�P �� ,� , �,��t-- °�,,�=� J �v �� -.��--�I�" �– lJ�� _ c i , ) �� --� �I r�,s �- w�.� a„ d�-�. ��'`�`' ----, �� .� C � ^ �� ` �.�,. � �� - � .�-�-- �— ��-�,� . ��►.� '�� 5 �u� � � � :� �- � �''-�- ��` °�1�.� �c��.�-, � .w-Z.�,�, ��. Ga� � � � . �► z �� -' c��- - � � � �-� �� :�,.,.�� —� � G��- w.�,.�s� �m � � �� °d� c�s�+�,,�— �� o�� -��- a� � � s� ' ��e.� ��1 ��'�-� U�.� J�� , . . � , � _ � �,o Iv�� . �� 1� e -�1�- �—d�- �- �ti� �� _ , � — ��— . l�� -�' �t /tQC�w.a,.,� �� C.� \✓1 \�Y+�` �v'� f � �✓'7 �N C/"'�/ lv S� C�� 1 V�r` � ` � --� . � �.� c� a- � '� ( .��.�- ` ��.�,.� �� "� � - _ � � So�'1�,.,�.� � ��,r--�� , °�lv.�-� �� , - .� � � �' c�-1��..0 �.7►�,w��-e,� '� -� � ��-s �� -.� °�� i'`�`� � �=�+,,-�-� � °� \ �,.� G�� . 3 � � �� ,.-� �, � � � �� QLM ) ��S �-rk ��5' �� - , W`�� Y'� � \ ^ i � � �I1 I/�,(�/� (� r , .iv � "t C'�,'� `1�1r'�-a.c�� °�'�"'1�S1-ed� �"l��-'�i.�. ��I-� ��..1 b 1��. , �- u`�%l.� � �.�.,�.� � �� _ �� - � � � . G�_ a �� Q1�e .�-tJL, s � �a� - -r u � 3 � �� - - l .:� � �- �c� � � �� y� 1�e � �� .�� d;� �7 , � _ U�� c.�t- c.d �°�, � � w��-�. t �� j �� • � _ � � . ��`C�� ►� �- 1 r�.�c.-� c-�r�d,,`�- `--� , �� wi�d l� � � l�� ►`,--� l�►-.pr°�'r' c.h,�a,•� . � � " � � lM� t 1� ` � ��-`�`- °�— �� C��c��,r ��c��Lc�� .�. � �,.-� I'� ��--e� �.� ��,-,=� , ` ��.-- r a,,. c�,��1 1�„-�es -,r�-�..-�— � ��— � t�-e�� °� � ' � � a�--ri--� �-`�..; . - c.�-� � � � -�-� �� +�� • � �-� � � `�� . . �� , ( �el Il�� e � , �'�.e_�J��►�-ers� �1�'b ` �� Q , _ ,. �� G�.-� �L c�. �l`�+d�-��" � ��-s � vr�" 11 ��5� 11 �� . —�". c� ��-z�� Cheryl Caines From: john.cousineau@verizon.com Sent: Sunday, December 16, 2007 12:35 PM To: Cheryl Caines Subject: NF&R STATION 50 12585 WALNUT ST. I apologize about not getting back to you sooner on this. I just got to the bottom of my work stack. You asked for a comment on this. I see no problems supplying your phone service there. We also have FIOS(fiber)available at the location. [f that is your question. We have several underground cables along Walnut St. and at least one vault in the street. Depending on how extensive the road improvement will be they may be in the way. 1 hope this is the information you are looking for. Thank you for your time and patience. John R.Cousineau Network Engineer OSP Network Engineering and Planning � Verizon Communications Office-503.643.0371 Fax-503.643.0977 john.cousineau(a�verizon.com 1 DKS Associates TRANSPORTATION SOLUTIONS � I • . ;_,; ,_ . � � � MEMORANDUM DATE: November 29, 2007 TO: Frank Angelo,Angelo Plannin�Group FROM: Peter L. Coffey,P.E.,DKS Associates SUBJECT: Tualatin Valley Fire & Rescue Walnut Street Station Supplemental Driveway Sight Distance Information P07059-000 This memorandum provides supplemental information regarding driveway sight distance for the proposed Tualatin Valley Fire&Rescue(TVF&R}Walnut Street Station and Community Center located on the north side of Walnut Street between SW Gaarde Street and SW 121St Avenue in the City of Tigard. The transportation impact analysis for this project(dated July 2007) identified a sight distance issue with the proposed westerly access to the sight. Based on discussions with Kim McMillan of the City of Tigardi, it was decided that since Walnut Street was recently improved by Washington County,that using Washington County standards for intersection/driveway sight distance would be appropriate. The Washington County standards for intersection/driveway sight distance are attached. The 85`h percentile speed on Walnut Street in the westbound direction is 40 mph2 and is 43 mph in the eastbound direction. Therefore, 400 feet of sight distance is required from the proposed westerly driveway to the east. Based on field measurements taken on November 13, 2007,there is 390 feet of sight distance available from the estimated location of the westerly driveway3 looking to the east as shown in Figure 14. A short(approximately five feet in height)wood fence creates the sight distance obstruction. If a portion of the short fence is removed,then there would be 405 feet of sight distance available which would meet the sight distance requirement. If the fence obstruction is removed,then a shed will create the sight distance obstruction at 405 < 1 Telephone discussion between Peter Coffey(DKS Associates)and Kim McMillan of the City of Tigard on November 8,2007. 2 24-hour volume and speed survey conducted Apri13,2007. 3 Assumed location for sight distance measurement is 47 feet west of the center line of the existing driveway to the site. 4 The 390 feet of sight distance was measured from the approximate location of the proposed westerly site driveway with a driver's eye located 10 feet from the face of curb and 3.5 feet above the driveway to an object height of 4.25 feet. 1400 SW Fifth Avenue Suite 500 Portland,OR 97201 (503}243-3500 ((503)243-1934 fax www.dksassociates.com 1 �'�^`'? t. � � �f ' K ;� :- Fosition of objc ; +�`�' �' '°� � , ��$ {'�� ':.t� a �S"3��;,��- . �� ,,� n lane - �Cv �. ;?' ' g�� • , .{.�ir�ht•425' �*�x � �: �,C��:s �. !� .}`ii4, �� *�C' t� � �`� �� .� �.� -y `ti�. AS r E .. x:. 'Y�'�.�4 � 7 "j �+q .1'� r q+i�l ° Y:^�E'�� ' �74' �`�+J.. -� j a` j qh;�' '�+.,.�. � aq. 'r ' � ,M :�. � ; r y � �_ � �s � Y_.2�., � .`A.�"'. ��5 ., ? � 1 � a�E.',t� ` :�"�� s .'?�^`�,— '� 4�+ . "^'��}"`'�dei� ?�� - - '� �� t�.;... � ,��+++� r 4 5 i' .:�,�! T�)'$��. l� �l ,'��Y � � "�iL�`t Obstruction � �,'k, � � ,�� n � (Fence) � ',�.� � ,� �"' ��' �r}�� , �or � a r - �O' ��'�s�y�y.�1'�.� �� . ,�.n�i T�y; �', �4� b.,�jn ' (� 7g�4 �A7''� t .ic:i ,�3y r'� i"t F�� l �iS�'fSr4�.� `.�` � � "' �,�, � �� `��l�tc �'Y�-H 4 {�5s'Sry j.Y 1� � ., .. "�. . l��'S�,Y �,�' �'"i 1 ta . "� 'fY°.�~r ' <'1 :;X' � : �$n.iR /YS�� L +'ii 3 i��.�� i�� y�,,�# �� *� ri`.�.�� ''... � �`Y��;� �7ij@{i�;A� (S 4�l; ae6. - �r.5r* ; ' "�1 7� ?T � +��4�'��{ ' �,� w..t i A` r... �-- ,y�� ' 7 .. �, y ';�� } �.; . 'R�c � �{S � .,,� 4*`�� Position of dnver in proposea ;I� " �r-- y�" w ��-� dfN°W� ' �,� �Y '._Sj' ��,ty�.ry .'.5 Distance from edge ,� r �r�� ` �,, �f n�v mP�N�urb: 10' �. �' � w+i , G r, . � :�� ' �� '� �+�t a_ •�t R t= I . ,��. �`K`� s '4��' �-�y N� �'i-�4} ,,�: :�„;�� '.�� t��: ,i'� . t'S �t'�} �'``��,�O �'�' , 'S �Cs�''+ � �f °k` �„t r��r'� I Ca� ��"r' • r - •' ^s. Y� j� i� s. ..��(�.t�,� . 7 r';' "�''4y�r,.`1 0� I��.'a' ,K...��7d;t;s.�Y�3i"�i�+"`54'�r� � -�- � S�y�,v��r � i*4 �� J .. . . 1 �� r . f i N �'�� , t < ��_, � I r �� ; •i �, f � � �) �!� 1! 1�-��:� � � . �.' �"j � �? a � � ,s_:`�f}T�- ' � � B,. !' � ��? �, 3t a.,�. � ,,S'S—�' i ��}t,�k� `:� Y,��v.��'�+�� C ' . � r � � ry � . �' �t "� 1�:.� '3f'� 'g, ' n r � �� ,� � �,�� : ` i , �;', �' •^ y +,�,,�,�i NV �` �+ 1 r'� K�� `�.r .. _J ,l�i." I F,� I A" � +t�Xr :;'.� :.�,�� «a.- �7� +Cf .�� a�,•�� ' ��( ��. �; y,� ;�.,�, �} � _e ; � �# r r �'P� i ��..�. ' I y _. . r' � �:�1� +�� t {-... �-� i� f .� y *� , K�1 . �� '�x�V � 7'��P� 1 :� ' t "•'�!� � � ��. �,";x,;� � � '� F`�'.�• "� � ,?,3 � �' �` �► t�' �, r � � �w �� - , . , �. ••x "� ' � �t�..T _��7�r�,e�} `�it�^� di ��e t�'�� '` �j�> >b�.,. '.:, �.� � ; � !M'�`-- •�ct• `�� .�r�y,:, .� , r �r. - r e �t � t4s...� t �'� Fos r� n o`o�: a - �'-�r t.�-��'i �r7 � ;�f i ' ,�� i;� �, ,� � i� in iane - i ;�� `� �! ' Height:4.25' ,". ., � � ��' � - � �~ �iT �r �. ��s ', �L� _ ..i+,u�c..' �. j��1� t� � �` �� ,,» . �y�:.�1 9 �. "# t 1� ��':�'.�31.�,.. .�� '! '� ��{ � y �t}, �� ' �� r -,.,'� � �"�;��-�-.�, ti"�,� • �: �'� ' �' . �i � , � � :��` � f ,, :L_��"� 1 ::��,��•..�s `i _ ' �- #.� �-"� �;� �� ;{°X. s.� �j . � , i�f 3i ,i`�., �1" �'� 1 DKS Associates Figure � ,pR}L 'NF�JSPGN'Atif�'d S0�^iID"JS � -': `:� SIGHT DISTANCE ' ��'` � MEASUREMENT °�"��'�" NOSCALE I � >•.� , : ' V-94 ARTICLE V: PUBLlC, .ILlTIES AND SERV10ES 5a1 -PUBLlC FAC1LIlYAND SERVlCE REQUIREMEfVTS Access points shown in the Transportation Plan or on a Community Pian within a Transit Oriented District are not subject to the access spacing standards, and do not need an access spacing variance or an access management plan. However, as part of the development review process, the exact location of such access points shall be determined and safety impacts associated with such access points shall be iden�ified and mitigated. E. Interim Access No development shall be denied a Development Permit for the sole reason that the parcel for which it is sought cannot physically accommodafe the access spacing requirements of this Code. In such an event, the use may be issued an interim access permit which shall expire when access as required under Article V becomes available. An interim access permit may be granted based upon the following: (1) The site is situated such that adequate access cannot otherwise be provided in accord with the access spacing requirements of this Code. (2) The interim access shall meet minimum County tra�c safety and operational requirements, including sight distance. (3) Alternate access shall not be deemed adequate and connections to alternate access shatl not be required if the resulting route of access would require a trip in excess of one (1) block or five-hundred (500)feet out of direction (whichever is less). (4) The property owner signs a waiver of the right to remonstrate against the formation of a Local Improvement District or similar financing mechanism for the primary purpose of constructing a public road or right-of-way providing access to the arterial or collector road; such access shall meet the minimum applicable County standard. (5) The property owner records an agreement to participate in any project that would consolidate access points where such project would not result in new or more severe traffic operation or safety problems. (6) The property owner records an agreement to abandon use of the existing private access way when an adequate alternative access becomes available. F. Sight Distance The following specifies the minimum requirements for sight distance for roads intersecting each other and for driveways intersecting public roads. It is the intent of this section to regulate the creation of new access points and new lots or parcels and development in the County in a manner that will insure that each new access point or each new lot or parcel created or development will have a safe access to a public road. (1) Inside a UGB, existing access points which do not meet the sight distance standards and are on property included with a development action which Date printed 11l25l04 ARTICLE V: PUBLIC FACILI i AND SERVICES V-95 501-PUBLIC FACIUTYAND SERVICE REQUIREMENTS will not add any additional vehicle trips to that access, are exempt from this Section (501-8.5 F.), except as required by 5ection 501-2.1 A. Improvements at these existing access points may be required to maximize sight distance to the extent practicable by the County Operations Division through an Access Permit or Right-of-way Permit. (2) The minimum intersectional sight distance shall be based on the vehicular ' speeds of the road. The vehicular speeds for the purpose of determining intersectional sight distance shall be the greater of the following unless the eighty-five percentile speed is determined to be less by the Review Authority pursuant to the standards of Section 501-8.5 F. (2)(c). {a) Design Speed -A speed selected by a registered engineer(Oregon) for purposes of design and correlation of those features of a road, such as curvature, superelevation, and sight distance, upon which the safe operation of vehicles is dependent. (b) Posted Speed -That speed which has been established by the Oregon State Speed Control Board and is posted by the County. (c) Eighty-five Percentile Speed -That speed as certified by a registered engineer(Oregon)below which 85 percent of all traffic units travel, and above which 15 percent travel. The eighty-fifth percentile speed shall be measured at the point where the sight restriction occurs. (3) The intersectional sight distance shafl: (a) Be based on an eye height of 3.5 feet and an object height of 4.25 feet above the road; and (b) Be assumed t�be 10 feet from the near edge of pavement or the extended curb line or the near edge of the graveled surface of a gravel road to the front of a stopped vehicle. (4) Minimum intersectional sight distance shall be equal to ten (10) times the vehicular speed of the road as determined by the standards of Section 501- 8.5 F. (1}and (2)such as in the table below. INTERSECTtONAL SIGHT DISTANCE DISTANCE ALONG MPH CROSSROAD (FT) 25 250 30 300 35 350 40 400 �5 450 50 500 55 550 Date printed 11/25/04 ; V-16 ARTlCLE V: PUBLIC. ;fUT/ES AND SERVICES 501-PUBLlC FAClLITYAND SERVICE REQUlREMENTS (5} Intersectional sight distance values shall conform with (3)above. For significant road improvement projects, the above intersectionai standards shall be met in addition to the AASHTO remaining sight distance standards. {6) For land development actions,the following specifies the procedure for determining whether or not minimum sight distance requirements are met: (a) Land Development Services Division personnel will review the Traffic Impact Statement. (b) Land Development Services Division personnel will perform the initial sight distance measurements. (c) If the measurements made by Land Development Services Division personnel do not meet the minimum requirements shown in the table, the applicant may request the Operations Division personnel to perform more precise measurements. (d) If the measurements made by Land Development Services Division personnel or the Operations Division personnel do not meet the minimum requirements shown in the table, the applicant may retain a State of Oregon registered professional engineer to perform the field measurements. If the applicanYs engineer does perform the measurements and submits the information to the County for acceptance, the information must bear the.stamp and signature of the engineer and must meet the minimum sight distance requirements. (7) In those instances where there are no access locations available to the site that meet or can meet the sight distance requirements, a written request for modification may be submitted to the Director. The request for modification shall be specifically stated in #he notice for the accompanying development permit and shall be considered as part of said development permit. The request for modification of the sight distance requirements shall be subject to the following: (a) Submitted and certified by a registered engineer(Oregon); (b) Documented and reference nationally accepted specifications or standards; (c) Certified that the modification will not compromise safety or the intent � of the County's transportation standards, which include but are not limited to the following: Washington County Transportation Plan; Washington County Uniform Road Improvement Design Standards; Resolution and Order No. 86-95 as modified or updated, (Determining Traffic Safety Improvements Under the Traffic Impact Fee Ordinance- Process Documentation); Community Plans; Comprehensive Framework Plan; and the Community Development Code; (d) The cost of any modifications agreed to must be borne by the applicant; and Date printed 11/25/04 ART1CtE V: PUBLlC FACfL S AND SERVlCES V-17 501 -PUBLIC FACILITY AND SERVICE REQUIR�MENTS (e) There shall be no location available to provide access to the praposed development site which currently meets the sight distance requirements, or which can be altered to meet the sight distance requirements. Alterations needed to provide adequate sight distance include but are not limited to grading and the removal of vegetation. For the purpose of this subsection aiternative access location means: 1. Any location on the proposed development site which meets or can meet the sight distance requirements; or 2. Any location off the proposed development site which: (i) Can provide access to the site by an existing access easement or through an access easement which will be provided to the site as part of the development application; and (ii} Meets or can meet the sight distance requirements. G. Motor Vehicle Access Restriction (1) In order to implement the access spacing and safety requirements of this article, a motor vehicle access restriction shall be recorded along a development site's frontage on a Collector or Arterial road, except at approved motor vehicle access locations. The Review Authority may require a motor vehicle access restriction to be recorded along a site's frontage on a Local or Neighborhood Route street that intersects with a Collector or Arterial road in order to address operational and safety concerns at the intersection(s). (2) The motor vehicle access restriction shall be recorded as a restrictive covenant or, if a plat is filed, as a partition or subdivision plat restricfion. H. Road Standards (1} All roads proposed to be of public ownership shall conform to the County Road Standards. (2) All proposed curve radii shall be designed to County Road Standards for truck-turning requirements. (3) All roads not proposed to be of public ownership shall conform to Section = 409 (Private Streets). 501-8.6 Methods to Assure Facilities and Services A legal and enforceable document, contract or process which assures the County that a public improvement will be accomplished. Assurances may include but are not limited to the following: A. For Arterial and Collector roadways, payment of the Traffic Impact Fee, except: {1) As provided in Sections 501-10 and 501-11; Date printed 11/25/04 I • � � . �. Cheryl Caines From: Katherine Prew[kprew@angeloeaton.com] Sent: Thursday, November 29, 2007 3:16 PM To: Cheryl Caines Subject: RE: Walnut Fire Station Attachments: Landscape Plan_Square Feet.pdf Cheryl, That is correct; we just counted the areas that were landscaped as part of this project. I've attached a plan to this email that shows the areas we counted and their square footages. Please let me know if there is anything else you need. Thanks, Katie From: Cheryl Caines [mailto;cherylc@tigard-or.gov] Sent: Wednesday, November 28, 2007 4:54 PM To: Katherine Prew Subject: Walnut Fire Station Katie, I'm reviewing the Walnut Fire Station. The application states on page 2-11 that 15%of the site is landscaped. From looking at the site plan that should only take into account the actual landscaped areas and not all of the pervious area for the site. Is that correct? I'll try to consolidate most of my other questions into one e-mail. Thank you. Cheryl Caines Associate Planner City of Tigard (503) 718-2437 1 // / O � ; � �� . , , % , �� ji. � %� �S.F. ��' ' � I � _ �'i�=� _ � � � --- 0 , i � o 0 ,� i 11 � F. Z , � 0 675 . � � � `\ � _ -- -- -- i �� / � 0 � � �— � �ii� , - � / 0 � - ' i i � � / 0 �I- i i � q i � � � c ; ,' � �� i � 3 � �-�F. '/ ; �� , �� , �� ; � „4' ' , 21,986 S.F. TOTAL LANDSCAPING � p u �__ � B ' % � � i � i n � --_ _—_ i i i i i� o—J �� — � i LAN DSCAPE AREA PLA ;� u � ,� �ra s.F. _ ��'�� F ' �i� _� 7o s,.�:. , �a �„ �� —o" 0 _ __�- ��.,� , ,,�/ ------— ---— ,,_, -- __ _ 418 �62 S.F. --� — — — 0 ' `R�`� ��,- � _ - -- ---- - — coN� � NOTIC.'E TO MORTGAGEE, 'NHOLDER,VENDOR OR SF� ER THE TTGARD DEVELOPMENT�DE RF,4��RES THATIF YOUREC�IVE T�IIS NOTTCE, �� IT SHAL.I_BE PROMI'TLY FORWARDED TO THE PURC�IASER � PUBLIC HEARING NOTICE NOTTC� IS HEREBY GIVEN THAT THE TIGARD HEARINGS OFFICER, AT A MEETING ON MONDAY DECEMBER 17, 2007 AT 7:00 PM, IN T'HE TOWN HALL OF Tf� 'TIGARD QVIC C�NTER AT 13125 S�x� HALL BOULEVARD,TTGARD,OREGON 97223 WILL CONSIDER THE FOLLOWING APPLICATTON: FILE NOS.: CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT CUP) 2007-00003 SENSITIVE LANDS REVIEW (SL ) 2007-00004 AD TIVIENT VAR 2007-00036 SI�PERNIIT (�GN}�2007-00171 FILE TITLE: TUALATIN VALLEY FIRE & RESCUE WALNUT STATION APPLICANT/ Tualatin ValleyFire &Rescue APPLICANT'S Angelo Planning Group OWNER Attn: GaryWells REPRESENTATIVE: Attn: FrankAngelo 20665 SW Blanton St. 921 SW Washington St., Suite 468 Aloha, OR 97007 Portland, OR 97205 REQLJEST: The applicant is requesting Conditional Use approval to construct a new fire station with a community room. Sensitive lands review is required because Krueger Creek and associated wetlands are located on the site. The request is to release treated stormwater into the vegetated corridor around the creek The applicant has also requested an adjustment to reduce the access spaculg standards along a collector from 200 feet to 25 feet. LOCATION: 12585 SW Walnut Street;WCTM 2S104AD, Tax Lot 4500. ZONE: R 4.5: The R 4.5 zoning district is designed to accommodate detached single-family homes with or without accessory residential units at a iiununum lot size of 7,500 square feet. Duplexes and attached suigle-family units are perniitted conditionally. Some civic and u�stitutional uses are also perniitted conditionally. APPLICABLE RE VIE W CRITERIA: Communiry Development Code Chapters 18330, 18360, 18.390, 18.510, 18.705, 18.725, 18.745, 18,765, 18.775, 18.780, 18.790, 18.795 and 18.810. THE PUBLIC HEARING ON T�IIS MATTER WILL BE CONDUCTED IN ACCORDANC� WITH T��E RULES OF �IAI'T'ER 18.390 OF THE COMMLJMTY DEVELOPMENT CODE AND RULES OF PROC�DURES ADOPTED BY THE TTGARD aTY COUNQL AND AVAILABLE AT QTY HALL. ASSIST'IVE LISTEI�IING DEVICES ARE AVAILABLE FOR PERSONS WITH IMI'AIRED HEARING. 'I'HE QTY WILL ALSO ENDEAVOR TO ARRANGE FOR QUALIFIED SIGN LANGUAGE INTERPRETERS AND QUALIFIED BILINGUAL IN'IERPRETERS UPON REQLIEST. PLEASE CALL (503) 639-4171, EXT. 2438 (VOIC�,) OR (503) 684-2772 (TDD- TELECOMMUNICATTONS DEVICES FOR'THE DEAF�NO LESS THAN ONE WEEK PRIOR TO Tf-� HEARING 'I'O MAKE ARRANGEMENI'S. I ANYONE WISHING TO PRESEM �/RITTEN TEST'IMONY ON T�-IIS PROPC...�J ACI'ION MAY DO SO IN WRITING PRIOR TO OR AT T�-IE PUBLIC HEARING. ORAL TESTTMONY MAY BE PRESEN7'ED AT TI-�E PUBLIC HEARING. AT THF. PU�3LIC; HEARING, T�-�E HEARINGS OFFIC�R WILL REC�IVE A STAFF REPORT PRESENTATION FROM 'I'f-IE QTY PLANNER,OPEN TI-� PUBLIC HEARING,AND INVITE BOTH ORAL AND WRITTEN TESTTMONY. THE HEARINGS OFFIC�'.R MAY GONTTNUE THE PUBLIC HEARING TO ANOTf-iER MEETTNG TO OBTAIN ADDITTONAL INFORMATTON OR Q.OSE THE PUBLIC HEARING AND TAKE ACITON ON T'HE APPLICA7TON. IF A PERSON SUBMITS EVIDENCE IN SUPPORT TO Tf--� APPLICATION LESS 'I'HAN SEVEN (7) DAYS PRIOR TO T�-�E PUBLIC HEARING,ANY PARTY IS ENTITLED TO REQLJEST A CONTTNUANC� OF Tf� HEARING. IF TT�ERE IS NO CONTINUANC� GRANIED AT'IT-� HEARING,ANY PARTIQPANT IN THE HEARING MAY REQUEST THAT '1� RECORD REMAIN OPEN FOR AT LEAST SEVEN (7) DAYS AFTER 'I'I--3E HEARING. A REQUEST TT�AT Tf-� RECORD REMAIN OPEN CAN BE MADE ONLY AT THE FIRST EVIDENTIARY HEARING(ORS 197.763(6). INQUDED IN Tf--IIS NOTIC�, IS A LIST OF APPROVAL C�tiTERIA APPLICABLE TO THE REQUEST FROM Tf-� TIGARD COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT CODE AND TI-� TIGARD O�MI'REHENSIVE PLAN. APPROVAL OR DISAPPROVAL OF THE REQUEST BY `I'f-�E HEARINGS OFFIC�R WILL BE BASED UPON THESE QZITERIA AND THESE (�ITERIA ONLY. AT T�-� HEARING IT IS IMI'ORTANT THAT CONIl��ENTS RELA`I'ING TO TF-�E REQUEST PERTAIN SPEQFICALLY TO T�IE APPLICABLE QtITERIA LISTED. FAILURE TO RAISE AN ISSLTE IN PERSON OR BY LETTER AT SOME POINT PRIOR TO 7T�E Q.OSE OF TT-� HEARING ON TI--iE REQUEST ACCOMI'AI�IIED BY STATEMENI'S OR EVIDENCE SUFFIQENT TO ALLOW THE HEARINGS AUTHORITY AN OPPORTLJ1�tITY TO RESPOND TO TI-�ISSUE PREQ,UDES AN APPEAL TO Tf-�E LAND LJSE BOARD OF APPEALS BASED ON`IT-�AT ISSUE. ALL DOC,'UMENTS AND APPLICABLE CRITERIA IN TI� ABOVE-NO'I'ED FILE ARE AVAILABLE FOR INSPECITON AT NO COST OR GOPIES CAN BE OBTAINED FOR TWENTY-FIVE C�NTS (25C) PER PAGE, OR THE CURRENT RATE Q�ARGED FOR COPIES AT THE TIME OF THE REQLJEST. AT LEAST SEVEN (7) DAYS PRIOR TO 7'HE HEARING,A COPY OF THE STAFF REPORT WILL BE AVAILABLE FOR INSPECITON AT NO COST,OR A GOPY C.AN BE OBTAINED FOR TWENTY-FIVE (�NTS (25�) PER PAGE, OR T'I� C2JRRENT RATE C�-IARGED FOR COPIES AT THE 7TME OF Tf-� REQUEST. FOR FURTHER INFORMATION PLEASE CONTACT Tf-�E STAFF PLANNER CHERYL CAINES AT 503.639.4171, TTGARD Q'TY HALL, 13125 SW HALL BOULEVARD, TIGARD, OREGON 97223, OR BY E-MAIL TO cheryl�tigard-or.gov. � - L L ........ ,....�,.... �... / � � X:� I ti1C1NIT�hiAP � Q Q ----------- F �_i.�r�ini'_iiu�riC�--- `° ------------ � ----------- �HEN '� Tt.�_�L_�I'N�'_lLLEI- FIT�E��f'E:�:7.�E w R'_jLN UT�T_�TIi:�N m � � a AV E. � _ � BROOK� N ti � _ ry LEGEND: S ` � SUBJECT SITE J �� a' :� _ `N P�N � � -i RIE Cr ' ' � � / �' 1, ,�j/� / TIPPI F � � � ( �: 0. ♦ N Z J .n AL A .�...�. �«.o�e. �aooi�:.4+�� mmuNry everoomem W t� 7 , ••'ImegiCN1A I A Patty Luns ford - RE: TVF&R Neighborho eeting Page� ' '� � � �7j1��lC��%�'�3 � From: Patty Lunsford To: Mark Padgett Date: Friday, February 23, 2007 2:20:42 PM Subject: RE: TVF&R Neighborhood Meeting No problem, t will keep you in the notification loop. Have a great weekend! Patricia Lunsford, Planning Secretary City of Tigard, Oregon 13125 SW Hall Boulevard Tigard, OR 97223 503.639.4171, ext. 2438 patty@tigard-or.gov »> "Mark PadgetY' <mark@padgett.net> 2/23/07 2:17 PM »> Yes, I would like to receive information on this. Email is my preferred vehicle. Thanks. Mark Padgett voice 503.590.5226 cell 503.997.MARK email mark(a�padqett.net<mailto:mark(a�padqett.net> -----Original Message----- From: Patty Lunsford [mailto:PATTY(c�tiqard-or.qovl Sent: Friday, February 23, 2007 2:13 PM To: mark(a�padqett.net Cc: Dick Bewersdorff Subject: TVF&R Neighborhood Meeting Dear Mark, Some time ago, Planning Manager Dick Bewersdorff asked that I notify you when the fire district submitted a land use application for the new Tigard fire station. Therefore, I am forwarding this information to you regarding an upcoming neighborhood meeting which is required by the city prior to the land use application being submitted for the proposed new fire station . If you are still interested in receiving information pertaining to this proposed development, please let me know the method of notification you would prefer along with the pertinent mailing or email address. If you have any questions, please feel free to contact me. Sincerely, Patricia Lunsford, Planning Secretary City of Tigard, Oregon 13125 SW Hall Boulevard Patty l_unsford -TVF&R Neighborhood M�ing � Page 1 ..a . y From: Patty Lunsford To: mark@padgett.net Date: Friday, February 23, 2007 2:12:53 PM Subject: TVF&R Neighborhood Meeting Dear Mark, Some time ago, Planning Manager Dick Bewersdorff asked that I notify you when the fire district submitted a land use application for the new Tigard fire station. Therefore, I am forwarding this information to you regarding an upcoming neighborhood meeting which is required by the city prior to the land use application being submitted for the proposed new fire station . If you are still interested in receiving information pertaining to this proposed development, please let me know the method of notification you would prefer along with the pertinent mailing or email address. If you have any questions, please feel free to contact me. Sincerely, Patricia Lunsford, Planning Secretary City of Tigard, Oregon 13125 SW Hall Boulevard Tigard, OR 97223 503.639.4171, ext. 2438 patty@tigard-or.gov CC: Dick Bewersdorff DATE: PLANS CHECK NO.: PROJECT TITLE: COUNTYWIDE TRAFFIC IMPACT FEE APPLICANT: WORKSHEET MAILING ADDRESS: (FOR NON-SINGLE FAMILY USES) CITY/ZIP/PHONE: RATE PER TAX MAP NO.: LAND USE CATEGORY TRIP SITUS NO.ADDRESS: RESIDENTIAL $320.00 BUSINESS AND COMMERCIAL $$1.00 �� OFFICE $294.00 INDUSTRIAL $308.00 INSTITUTIONAL $133.00 PAYMENT METHOD: CASH/CHECK CREDIT INSTITUTIONAL ONLY: BANCROFT(PROMISSORY NOTE) �p,ND USE CATEGORY DESCRIPTION OF WEEKDAY AVG.TRIP WEEKEND AVG.TRIP DEFER TO OCCUPANCY USE RATE RATE BASIS: , F-� I 7 j r ;j x � I--� — �,� �I = �c Y��. y�� `-� i i� C�-�'-�i� � -�� O s ,r ��i u - � � �i�1 a -�r� < CALCULATIONS: PROJECT TRIP GENERATION: � �,r; � i� _ � FEE� _ "� - FOR ACCOUNTING PURPOSES ONLY ADDITIONAL NOTES: ROAD AMT.: TRANSIT AMT.: PREPARED BY: June 30,2007 Worksheet 06-07 CC WASHINGTON COUNTY TIF NOTEBOOK � RE QUE ST F OR COMME NT S " DATE: November 13,2007 TO: Jim Wolf,Tigard Police Department Crime Prevention Officer FROM: Cit�of Tigard Planning Division STAFF CONTAGT: Cheryl Caines,Associate Planner(�c2437) Phone: (503) 639-4171 Fax: (503) 684-7297 Email: cheiti�lcCa?ti�ard-or.gov CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT (CUP) 2007-00003/SENSITIVE LANDS REVIEW(SLR) 2007-00004/ ADJUSTMENT (VAR) 2007-00036 - TUALATIN VALLEY FIRE & RESCUE WALNUT STATION - RE QUE ST: The applicant is requesting Conditional Use app roval to construct a new ire station with a community room. Sensitive lands review�s required because Krueger Creek and associated wetlands are located on the site. The request is to release treated stormwater into the vegetated corridor around the creek The applicant has also requested an adjustment to reduce the access spacing standards along a collector from 200 feet to 25 feet. LOCATION: 12585 SW Walnut Street; WCTM 2S104AD, Tax Lot 4500. ZONE: R 4.5: The R 4.5 zoning district is designed to accommodate detached single- family homes with or without accessory residential uruts at a rninimum lot size of 7,500 square feet. Du�lexes and attached single-family units are perniitted conditionally. Some civic and institutional uses are also pernutted conditionally. APPLICABLE REVIEW CRITERIA: CommunityDevelopment Code Chapters 18.330, 18.360, 18.390, 18.510, 18.705, 18.725, 18.745, 18,765, 18.775, 18.780, 18.790, 18.795 and 18.810. Attached are the Site Plan,Vcinity Map and Applicant's Statemcnt/Plans for your review. From inforn�ation supplied byvarious departments and agencies and from other information available to our staff, a report and recommendation will be prepared and a decision will be rendered on the proposal in the near future. If you wish to cominent on this app lication, WE NEED YOUR COMMENTS BACK BY: NOVEMBER 27,2007. You may use the space provided below or attach a separate letter to return your commenu. If you are unable to res�ond by the above date, please phone the staff contact noted above with your comments and confirm your comments in writing as soon as possible. If you have any questions,contact the Tigard Plaruung Division, 13125 SW Hall Boulevard,Tigard,OR 97223. PLEASE CHECK THE FOLLOWING ITEMS THAT APPLY: _ We have reviewed the proposal and have no objections to it. Please contact of our office. Please refer to the enclosed letter. _ Written coirunenu provided below: Name &Number of Person(s) Commenting: �`M ��`� .��7.I I ��B� RE QUE ST FOR COMMENTS '' DATE: November 13,2007 TO: PER ATTACHED FROM: Cit�of Tigard Planning Division STAFF CONTACI': Cheryi Caines,Associate Planner(x2437�. Phone: (503) 639-4171 Fax: (503) 684-7297 Email: che�ylcCt?ltigard-ar.gov CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT (CUP) 2007-00003/SENSITIVE LANDS REVIEW(SLR) 2007-00004/ ADJUSTMENT (VAR) 2007-00036 - TUALATIN VALLEY FIRE & RESCUE WALNUT STATION - RE QLJE ST: The applicant is requesting Conditional Use app roval to construct a new ire station with a community room. Sensitive lands review�s required because Krueger Creek and associated wetlands are located on the site. The request is to release treated stormwater uito the vegetated comdor around the creek. The applicant has also requested an adjustment to reduce the access spacing standards along a collector from 200 feet to 25 feet. LOCATION: 12585 SW Walnut Street; WCI1V12S104AD, Tax Lot 4500. ZONE: R 4.5: The R 4.5 zoning district is designed to accommodate detached single- family homes with or without accessory residential units at a minunum lot size of 7,500 square feet. Du�lexes and attached single-family units are pernutted conditionally. Some civic and institutional uses are also pernutted conditionally. APPLICABLE REVIEW CRITERIA: CommunityDevelopment Code Chapters 18.330, 18360, 18.390, 18.510, 18.705, 18.725, 18.745, 18,765, 18.775, 18.780, 18.790, 18.795 and 18.810. Attached are the Site Plan,Vcinity Map and Applicant's Statement/Plans for your review. From infonnauon supplied by various departmenu and agencies and from other information available to our staff, a report and recoinmendation will be prepared and a decision will be rendered on the proposal in the near future. If you wish to comment on this application, WE NEED YOUR COMMENTS BACK BY: NOVEMBER 27. 2007. You may use the space provided below or attach a separate letter to renun your comments. If you are unable to res�ond bv the above date, please phone the staff contact noted above with your corrunents and confum your commenu in writing as soon as possible. If you have any questions,contact the Tigard Plamung Division, 13125 SW Hall Boulevard,Tigard,OR 97223. PLEASE CHECK THE FOLLOWING ITEMS THAT APPLY: _ We have reviewed the proposal and have no objections to it. Please contact of our office. Please refer to the enclosed letter. _ Written comments provided below: Name &Number of Person(s) Commenting: �'TY OF TIGARD REQUEST FOR ''�MMENTS � NOTIFICAI . LIST FOR LAND USE & COMMUNITY DE. �PMENT APPLICATIONS ��t� �,., ; - , " {�J��2�';-��: �� FILE NOS.: "�' �•� v�' 7 uc��v� FILE NAME: �V r �f CITY OfFICES LONG RANGE PLANNING/Ron Bunch,Planning Mgr. `�CURRENT PWNNING/Todd Prager/Arbonst �POLICE DEPT./Jim Wolf,Crime Prevention O�cer `/BUILDING�IVISION/Mark Vandomelen,Plans Ex.Supervisor ✓ENGINEERING DEPT./Kim McMillan,Dvlpmnt.Review Engineer ✓HEARINGS OFFICER(+2 sets) _CITY ADMINISTRATION/Cathy Wheatley,City Recorder �/PUBLIC WORKS/Rob Murchison,Project Engineer PLANNING COMMISSION/GRETCHEN(+12 sets) COMMUNITY DVLPMNT.DEPT./Planning-Engineering Techs.�[PUBLIC WORKS/Steve Martin,Parks Supervisor �FILEIREFERENCE(+2 sets) _CODE ENFORCEMENTlChristine Damell,Code Compliance Specialist(DCA) SPECIALDISTRICTS TUAL.HILLS PARK&REC.DIST.a,�,�TUALATIN VALLEY FIRE&RESCUE+� _ TUALATIN VALLEY WATER DISTRICT+► �/CLEAN WATER SERVICES+� Planning Manager North Division Administrative Office Marvin Spiering/SWM Program 15707 SW Walker Road John K.Dalby,Deputy Fire Marshall PO Box 745 155 N.First Avenue Beaverton,OR 97006 14480 5W Jenkins Road Beaverton,OR 97075 Hilisboro,OR 97124 Beaverton,OR 97005-1152 IOCAI AN�STATE IURISDICTIONS CITY OF BEAVERTON �IF CITY OF TUALATIN � ✓OR.DEPT.OF FISH 8 WILDLIFE �OR.DIV.OF STATE LANDS _ Planning Manager Planning Manager Devin Simmons,Habitat Biologist Melinda Wood rvv�unFO,�,�R��„�a� Steven Sparks,Dev Svcs Manager 18880 SW Martinazzi Avenue Norlh Willamelte Watershed District 775 Summer Street NE,Suite 100 PO Box 4755 Tualatin,OR 97062 18330 NW Sauvie Island Road Salem,OR 97301-1279 Beaverton,OR 97076 Portland,OR 97231 �R.PUB.UTILITIES COMM. METRO-LAND USE 8 PLANNING� _OR.DEPT.OF GEO.8 MINERAL IND. 550 Capitol Street NE _ CITY OF DURHAM iM 600 NE Grand Avenue 800 NE Oregon Street,Suite 5 Salem,OR 97310-1380 City Manager Portland.OR 97232-2736 Portland,OR 97232 17160 SW Upper Boones Fry.Rd. Joanna Mensher,Data ResourceCenter(ZCA) US ARMY CORPS.OF ENG. Durham,OR 97224 Paulette Allen,GrowlhManagernen[Coordinator OR.DEPT.OF LAND CONSERV.&DVLP. Kathryn Harris�MaP:acws�ane,o��Y� _ Mel Huie,GreenspacesCoortlinata�CPA/ZOA) M8f2 UII02(Comp PlanAmendmentsBMeasure37) Routing CENWP-OP-G CITY OF KING CITY ilt _ Jennifer Budhabhatti,R��,a�a�a��e,tweua�as� 635 Capitol Street NE,Suite 150 PO Box 2946 City Manager _ C.D.Manager,GrowthManagementServices Salem,OR 97301-2540 Portland,OR 97208-2946 15300 SW 116th Avenue King City,OR 97224 WASHINGTON COUNTY� OR.DEPT.OF ENERGY lPowehines i�a.rea� OR.DEPT OF AVIATION�MonoPo�s Towarsl Dept.of Land Use&Transp. Bonneville Power Administration Tom Highland,Piann�ng 155 N.First Avenue _CITY OF LAKE OSWEGO� Routing TTRC—Attn: Renae Ferrera 3040 25th Street,SE Suite 350,MS 13 Planning Director PO Box 3621 Salem,OR 97310 Hillsboro.OR 97124 PO Box 369 Portland,OR 97208-3621 Steve Conway�c�,e�a�rwcs.> Lake Oswego,OR 97034 Planning Division�zcn�MS�a _ OR.DEPT.OF ENVIRON.QUALITY(DEQ) ODOT,REGION 1 � Brent Curtis ccan� CITY OF PORTLAND (NOtity for Wetlands and Potantial Environmental Impac�s) Development Review Coordinator poria Mateja�zcn�Ms ia Planning Bureau Director Regional Administrator _Carl Toriand, Right-of-Way Section�va�ro�s� _Sr.Cartographer icP�cA,r.,s,. 1900 SW 4'"Avenue,Suite 4100 2020 SW FouRh Avenue,Suite 400 123 NW Flanders _Jim Nims,s��eYO�czcA,MS,s Portland,OR 97201 Portland,OR 97201-4987 Portland,OR 97209-4037 OR.PARKS 8 REC.DEPT. WA.CO.CONSOL.COMM.AGNCY ODOT,REGION 1 -DISTRICT 2A� _ODOT,RAIL DIVISION STATE HISTORIC DaveAustin�wcccn>°e„°,M�b.�...,, SamHunaidi,ASSistanlDistrictManager (No[ityilODOTR/R-Nwy.CrossinglsOnlyAcceastoLanO) PRESERVATIONOFFICE PO Box 6375 6000 SW Raab Road Dave Lanning,Sr Cmssmg Salery Specialist tr,on,Y if Properry Has HD Ovarlay) Beaverton,OR 97007-0375 Portland,OR 97221 555-13`"Street,NE,Suite 3 725 Sumner Street NE,Suite C Salem,OR 97301-4179 Salem,OR 97301 UTILITY PROVIDERS AND SPECIAL ACENCIES PORTLAND WESTERN R/R,BURLINGTON NORTHERN/SANTA FE RlR,OREGON ELECTRIC R1R(Bunington NorthemlSanta Fe R/R Predecessor) Bruce Carswell,President&General Manager 1200 Howard Drive SE Albany,OR 97322-3336 SOUTHERN PACIFIC TRANS.CO.R/R METRO AREA COMMUNICATIONS �OMCAST CABLE CORP. _TRI-MET TRANSIT DVLPMT. Clifford G Cabe,Construction Engineer Debra Palmer�a��e.aro�So��Y� Gerald Backhauscs��bA�eac«��a�� (IfProJedisWithmY.MileofaTranSitROUte) 5424 5E McLoughlin Boulev rd Twin Oaks Technology Center 14200 SW Brigadoon Court Ben Baldwin,Project Planner Portland,OR 972�� ,, ^ � Ir� 1815 NW 169th Place,S-6020 Beaverton,OR 97005 710 NE Holladay Street ` ��•Y� �� Beaverton,OR 97006-4886 Portland,OR 97232 �PORTLAND NERAL ELECTRIC �NW NATURAL GAS COMPANY �VERIZON cMCOaosaa� �QWEST COMMUNICATIONS ez,Svc.Design Consultant Scott Palmer,Engineering Coord. Brandon Kahler,Engineering Lynn Smith,Eng.ROW Mgr. 9480 SW Boeckman Road 220 NW 5econd Avenue 20575 Vonnewmann Dr.,Suite 150 8021 SW Capitol Hill Rd,Rm 110 Wilsonville,OR 97070 Portland,OR 97209-3991 Beaverton,OR 97075-1100 Portland,OR 97219 TIGARD/TUALATIN SCHOOL DIST.#23J BEAVERTON SCHOOL DIST.#48 '�COMCAST CABLE CORP. COMCAST CABLE COMMUNIC. Teri Brady,Administrative Offices Jennifer Garland,Demogrephics Alex Silantiev ,��p�,�ca,�=„ Brian Every,�EO��a�N��, 6960 SW Sandburg Street 16550 SW Merlo Road 9605 SW Nimbus Avenue,Bldg. 12 10831 SW Cascade Avenue Tigard,OR 97223-8039 Beaverton,OR 97006-5152 Beaverton,OR 97008 Tigard,OR 97223-4203 � INDICATES AUTOMATIC NOTIFICATION IN COMPLIANCE WITH INTERGOVERNMENTAL AGREEMENT IF WITHIN 500'OF THE SUBJECT PROPERTY FOR ANYIALL CITY PROf ECTS (Project Planner Is Responsible For Indicating Parties To Notify). h:\patty\masters�Request For Comments Notification List.doc (UPDArED: 24-Aug-07) (Also update:i:lcurpinlsetupllabels\annexationslannexation_utilities and franchises.doc,mailing labels 8 auto text when updating this documei RE QUE ST F OR COMME NT S " ;��:�::�:.:. , DATE: November 13,2007 TO: Mark Vandomelen, Plans Examination Su�ervisor FROM: Ci ,�of Tigard Planning Division STAFF CONTACT: Cheryl Caines,Associate Planner(�437� Phone: (503) 639-4171 FaY: (503) 684-7297 Email: cl_�en�lcCa�tigard-or.gov CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT (CLJP) 2007-00003/SENSITIVE LANDS REVIEW(SLR) 2007-00004/ ADJUSTMENT (VAR) 2007-00036 - TUALATIN VALLEY FIRE & RE SCUE WALNUT STATION - REQLTEST: The applicant is requesting Conditional Use approval to construct a new fire station with a communityroom. Sensitive lands review�s required because Krueger Creek and associated wetlands are located on the site. The request is to release treated stormwater into the vegetated corridor around the creek The applicant has also requested an adjustment to reduce the access spacing standards along a collector from 200 feet to 25 feet. LOCATION: 12585 SW Walnut Street; WCTM 2S104AD, Tax Lot 4500. ZONE: R 4.5: The R 4.5 zoning district is designed to accommodate detached single- farruly homes with or without accessory residential units at a minimum lot size of 7,500 square feet. Du�lexes and attached single-farrvly units are pernzitted conditionally. Some civic and institutional uses are also pernutted conditionally. APPLICABLE REVIEW CRITERIA: CommunityDevelopment Code Cllapters 18.330, 18.360, 18.390, 18.510, 18.705, 18.725, 18.745, 18,765, 18.775, 18.780, 18.790, 18.795 and 18.810. Attached are the Site Plan,Vicinity Map and Applicant's Statement/Plans for your review. From inforniation supplied by various depanments and agencies and from other information available to our staff, a report and recommendation will be prepared and a decision will be rendered on the proposal in the near future. If you wish to comment on this app licadon, WE NEED YOUR COMMENTS BACK BY: NOVEMBER 27. 2007. You may use the space provided below or attach a separate letter to return your conunents. If you are unable to respond by the above date, please phone the staff contact noted above with yotu- coinrnents and confirm y�ur commenu in writing as soon as possible. If you have any questions,contact the Tigard Planning Division, 13125 SW Hall Boulevard,Tigard,OR 97223. PLEASE CHECK THE FOLLOWING ITEMS THAT APPLY: _ We have reviewed the proposal and have no objections to it. Please contact of our office. Please refer to the enclosed letter. � Written comments provided below: �r�� w�L S�'o r r-, [�A�...a q c_ S�► .r-�c►--•. ,S-`t a 1 I �d��o I,., (•-� , t'�► C i�.�,o�-ri �� O S i°S G. P✓ti V a-� Sc�,_.:, }-w vL► ��t.�..�c./- �Ns��I�-� 11�,��ov S^�►,G 1 I C�M_.e l.� (�; TL, C�►�,,,o-��✓ 7 OS PSC. . �✓�i V�� a.-`'C./ J 2✓`V�L t� A.�d+ W a"�'�� S"�Y� bu'fi ot/ I�11lJ i�►4 S�a 1 � �r�w.�o �� („a;fi7-, C�.a�o �-ci �o O S P S G �ir,L�a r�t �Y'G•�P� GZ+�t� �v�a�d✓T GC✓�t � +��. �a-� ro�`P'�� /O �.S �.s� S�1 c/�-i�l./ � v I�{. O �Name &Number of Person(s) Commenting: � ` � ��r �v ,�-.�/� 2 �( 3� I J c� �► ►.. W � � r: . ; , RE QUE ST FOR COMMENTS '' =u�:�:�r...s DATE: November 13,2007 TO: Rob Mumhison,Public Works Project Engineer FROM: Ci ,�of Tigard Planning Division STAFF CONTACT: Cheryl Caines,Associate Planner(x2437� Phone: (503) 639-4171 Fax: (503) 684-7297 Ema;l: cherylc@tigaizi-or.gov CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT (CUP) 2007-00003/SENSITIVE LANDS REVIEW(SLR) 2007-00004/ ADJUSTMENT (VAR) 2007-00036 - TUALATIN VALLEY FIRE & RESCUE WALNUT STATION - REQUEST: The applicant is requesting Conditional Use app roval to construct a new ire station with a communityroom. Sensitive lands review�s required because Krueger Creek and associated wetlands are located on the site. The request is to release treated stormwater uito the vegetated corridor around the creek The applicant has also requested an adjustment to reduce the access spacing standards along a collector from 200 feet to 25 feet. LOCATION: 12585 SW Walnut Street; WCTM 2S104AD, Tax Lot 4500. ZONE: R 4.5: The R 4.5 zoning district is designed to accommodate detached single- family homes with or without accessory residential units at a minimum lot size of 7,500 square feet. Du�lexes and attached single-family uniu are pernutted conditionally. Some civic and institutional uses are also pernutted conditionally. APPLICABLE REVIEW CRITERIA: CommuniryDevelopment Code Chapters 18.330, 18.360, 18390, 18.510, 18.705, 18.725, 18.745, 18,765, 18.775, 18.780, 18.790, 18.795 and 18.810. Attachcd arc the Site Plan,Ycinity Map and Applicant's Statement/Plans for your review. Froin inforn�auon supplied by various departments and agencies and from other inforn�ation available to our staff, a repon and recommendation will be prepared and a decision will be rendered on the proposal in the near future. If you wish to coirunent on this application, WE NEED YOUR COMMENTS BACK BY: NOVEMBER 27. 2007. You may use the space provided below or attach a separate letter to return ybur commenu. If �ou are unable to res�ond by the above date, please phone the staff contact noted above with your conunents and confum your comments in writing as soon as possible. If you have anyquestions,contact the Tigard Plaiuung Division, 13125 SW Hall Boulevard,Tigard,OR 97223. PLEASE CHECK THE FOLLOWING ITEMS THAT APPLY: _ We have reviewed the proposal and have no objections to it. Please contact of our office. Please refer to the enclosed letter. _ Written con�unents provided below: �,t � ' S��_ S�7- � ( � C7 I Name &Number of Person(s) Commenting: I � �2.0' . SIDEWALK ADJACENT TO CURB 0 �$•� BREAK FLANGE SIDEWALK 18" CAST IRON 910 MIN 6'' MAX. VALVE BOX TOP ;`i;� `/\�j\ \�j, � • . >��•,�` �;iA%��%��%�7 �i i ii;i � � � , �:b .. . 'o• ��/��A/��A��/��// /��//�A��A//��/�� .o o•• '�'.. '•: 1 1�2;r!/��4,� DRAIN ROC��j��/%i�`%i�%/��/,��/��y�y' �� /\�/�\��d/��/��,; / `� TAR PAPER MOISTUI��i �,�/�;�� ::� 6" DUCTILE IRON PIPE �� RESTRAIN ALL JOINTS W� �`; �� "FIELD LOK" OR EQUAL GASKETS '� ;;; �� i \�;� ��\ a, i ��\ . /, i�� .'�T�-r�- _-; ,-�� %�% ��;� \,!%�� 6" MEGALUG RETAINER '�� % �;%``!�`�!�` GLAND (EBAA IRON) CONCRETE PIER 6" GATE VALVE BLOCK FLG. x M.J. M.J. x 6" FLG. TEE SI DEWALK WI TH PLAN TER 2�0' STRIP AT CURB o SIDEWALK 3" MIN. BREAK FLANGE " MAX. �� . � • , , ��A��A�� - ��A��A��A . . N��' , , �. i� �� / // // � /� /�,/ .�c ..• �o• • �j/\\�\\�� \,�\�\//\//� �\//\ .o o,••,��.. �: //� �/ �\\��\; -- 1. HYDRANTS TO BE MODERN MUELLER CENTURION, A-442,(OR APP'D EQUAL) 6" MJ, 5 1/4" MVO 3 PORT — TWO 2 1/2" PENTAGON OPERATION NUT, OPEN LEFT WITH THE FOLLOWING: A. OIL RESERVOIR B. BRONZE ACTUATION NUT C. BRONZE SEAT RING D. WEATHER SHIELD CAP E. SAFETY SLEEVE COUPLING F. THREADED NOZZLES WITH "0" RINGS G. NATIONAL STANDARD THREADS 2. SAFETY CHAINS TO BE REMOVED. 3. HYDRANTS TO BE PAINTED USING R-1317 SAFETY YELLOW OR AN ALTERNATE APPROVED BY DISTRICT FIRE MARSHALL. 4. HYDRANT TO BE INSTALLED TRUE AND PLUMB. 5. NO OBSTRUCTIONS WITHIN 3' 0" RADIUS OF HYDRANT. 6. IF SUBJECT TO VEHICLE DAMAGED, PROTECTIVE POST TO BE PROVIDED. 7. VALVE BOX TO BE IN ACCORDANCE WITH STANDARD DRAWING N0. 503 OR AS APPROVED BY ENGINEER. 8. THRUST BLOCKS SHALL NOT BE PLACED AT HYDRANT LOCATIONS. 9. INSTALL A STORZ HPHA50-45NH PERMANENT HYDRANT ADAPTER (OR EQUIVALENT) ON THE 4 1/2" PORT. �� "�0N NO SCALE � 5-1-02 ADD NOIE 9 �pN��N� o��,�aT _ FIRE HYDRANT DWG. N0. iai25 s.w. Hui e�w. �, „�. OREGON 9M23 ASS E M B LY 5,4,2 vacE: soa eas-~rn dTY OF 7R'./1RD Fnx: soa ee4-�� _ a�oo� �.:.� WATER METER PLAN METER BOX 1" UNION EACH SIDE DOUBLE CHECK VALVE ASSEMBLY � \��j�\/j�j \ \ \ � �� / �\�� ,•' �2„ �$,. ` �\/�� ` / � WATER METER 6„ CRUSHED ROCK BASE ELEVATION BOX SPECIFICATIONS DEVICE SIZE BOX TYPE 3/4" - 1" BROOKS #1419 SERIES OR EQUAL 1 1/2'� - 2" CARSON 1730D P15L OR EQUAL INSTALLATION SHOWN IS ONLY A SUGGESTION. 1. DOUBLE CHECK TO BE LOCATED DIRECTLY BEHIND WATER METER. 2. BRASS, STAINLESS, OR PLASTIC PLUGS TO BE INSTALLED IN TEST COCKS IF BELOW GROUND INSTALLATION. 3. DISTANCE FROM BOTTOM OF DEVICE TO FINISH GRADE, FREEZE PROTECTION, AND CLEARENCE FOR TESTING AND REPAIR ARE THE MAJOR CONSIDERATIONS FOR INSTALLATION. �aareovEO er: NO SCALE AGUSTIN P. DUENAS D 0 U B L E C H E C K DWG. N0. ENqNEERING OEPAR7I�AENT 73125 SW.HALL BLW. p��« "G"R°'�;°'�' ASSEMBLY 530 '�acE: sos es�-4rn MARCH 1998 CITY OF T1GAR0 F�` � �� p�,� APPROVAL DATE CITY WATER DEPT STANDARDS PLUMBING CODE THRUST BLOCK CITY APPROVED RETAINER GLAND BACKFLOW DEVICE FLANGE COUPLING ADAPTOR � FLOW 12" MIN MEGA FLG FIRE DEPARTMENT FLG OR EQUAL �� CONNECTION 6�� OPTIONAL AT THIS OSHA APPROVED LADDER MI 24" MIN LOCATION WITH ALUMINUM LADDER EXTENSION BY UTILITY VAULT � CONTRACTOR TO SEAL ALL PLAN OPENINGS IN VAULT WITH NON SHRINK GROUT PRIOR �� TO BACKFILLING r 3 MIN. 6 MAX. GROUND LINE � � DAYL GHO CURB OR „ 3" MIN CLEARANCE � ON OPENED MEGA FLG OR EQUAL OS&Y VALVE INLINE CHECK VALVE CONTRACTOR TO INSTALL RODENT CONCRETE BALLAST 3 CU. YD. "STANDON" �SCREEN MIN. WHERE FLOODING OR HIGH GROUNDWATER EXIST�� (TYP.) �� DRAIN TO DAYLIGHT OR INSTALL SUMP PUMP ELEVATION CONTACT CITY FOR PUMP SPECIFICATIONS 12" MIN 24" MAX FIRE DOUBLE CHECK VALVE ASSEMBLY FLOOR TO BOTTOM U1ILITY VAULT OR �EQUAL BILCO DOOR OF DEVICE SIZE VN7}� F.D.C. WITHOUT F.D.C. � `EQUAL 4 676—WA 577—WA J—SAL 6 687—WA 676—WA J-5AL 8 5106—LA 687—WA JD-3AL 10 5106—LA 2106—LA JD-3AL � CITY ENGINEER APPROVED EQUAL �aartovm er: NO SCALE AGUSTIN P. DUENAS DOUBLE CHECK DETECTOR ENpNEERING OEPARTMENT ia�xs s.w.ruu e�w. arr a+c�a DWG. N0. ""�R°,�;°'�' VALVE ASSEM BLY 5 3 3 w�: sw e�e-4�r GARCH 1998 CITY OF TIGARD F�' � �� p�� APPROVAL DAIE (E IN (N)=230.59' WATER INSTALLATION NOTES 1. SEE C2.2 FOR WATER DETAILS. � TAP INTO EXISTING 24"WATER LINE USING A 24"x4"TAPPING SLEEVE. INSTALL: (1)4"FLG X MJ VALVE WITH VALVE BOX (1)THRUST BLOCK (86)FEET 4" D.I. PIPE � INSTALL: (1)FDC(FROM VERTICAL RISER IN BUILDING) (1)3'X3'X4"CONCRETE PAD , (1)4"90° BEND (1)THRUST BLOCK � (78)FEET 4" D.I. PIPE � INSTALL: O (1)4"x4"x2"TEE �� (1)2" FLG X MJ GATE VALVE WITH VALVE BOX � � � (1)2"x1 1/2"REDUCER �� (1) 1 1/2"WATER METER � �.T� (1) 1 1/2"��CVA (1)THRUST BLQCK � � Z (73)FEET 1 1/2" D.I. PIPE � O ��„ �-G�� eTAP INTO EXISTING 24"WATER LINE USING A�,4�t4"TAPPING SLEEVE. �--� � 4 INSTALL: � � 1 4" FLG X MJ VALVE WITH VALVE BOX �j �j ( ) � /�-+ (2)THRUST BLOCK O (1)4"45° BEND _ � � (1)STANi�ARD FIRE HYDRANT ASSEMBLY � � (234)FEET 4" D.I.PIPE � INSTALL: � � � � (1)THRUST BLOCK � '` (1) 1 1/2" FLG X MJ VALVE WITH VALVE BOX � v SEE LANDSCAPE PLAN FOR CONTINUATION �� V� � � � � ABANDON EXISTING WATER METERS AND CAP LINE. QQ � � eINSTALL WATER LINE TO ALLOW 1 FOOT OF SEPARATION BELOW GAS LINE. (T , � 7 �.i�� , � . � � -:_._.... ---__ � __ �u_ .. .._..�..___._..:-_� _ ._ � �� r;`,��.. �J _ � � ._.._.,�_� � ,,�,. :� . , � _, _._.._ a � .,, (1)THRU� OCK • 1,,- '�, ° ` � � (1) 1 1/2" FLG X MJ VALVE WITH VALVI �_,- - -._ _ _ � _ �ti ,f .__.....____..__,_------_.� ' `, ,i ;, l --� . SEE LANDSCAPE PLAN FOR CON ,.._._.. ' � - � , : ...��.,_ Z.:�~ � T w' . �— '. . ....__.�.._. N. ,^,...r,i.� _ ._�.... . . ..�.._..'__'. M.. ,._�� -�_. . ...._..._....._.�._._ ..�__..., ._.. _ � ........._�.... .. ..... ' W ABANDON EXISTING WATER METERS _ STAF ;� 6 _, __,_ _ �._- " � ��---__.. , ---------_ _.� � .._ PARKI G , ;�, THREE—BAY FIRE ;�� ` tt�� .A.. �._- .. ; __ � w �� STATI�IV`-��--._,_ �� INSTALL WATER LINE TO ALLOW 1 FC ,�-- I . �_ � 4;:. � � . I __,.__.. , �. .._-----._� FF=236.00 .... �_ ....__ ..._.___.., __�_ �__..._.._. J _ ... .._. , I �._. ___..___..._____ � INSTALL GAS SEE PLUMBING :, ---,, _ _ - . t ,,.� - FOR DOMESTIC _......_.�_ METER . __. I I ---------� - CONTINUATION � VERTICAL CHECK '` '.�.. .-�" �' � � ��'"�.., VALVE ASSEMBLY •. __ ,----_.___.._... _ ___.. I .. ' '' ,�:.......__ I�` �'IN��DE BUILDING SEE PLUMBING.. .- -� . .._,...�..._.,_ .__�._.__._ _ __ �.-`� ,• (SEE"RLUMBING) FOR SANITARY ," A� -----� :-' � ` � CONTINUATION ; ' ` I : I t .._� ___ , _.. .. _ - ` _ - __ - 01 6 W 5.38 .- �,_ ___. ___. _:,ri��_..�.,,. __.�_�,..-��..�_:_,.� . .: _�.....�. - r , .--�•,. � .. S '152 " - -- -., �. VISITOR . - . _ _ _- . : / �1 PARKING I ; _ -... �' -- �� .�.. 1 . �- 1E�233. /� I ' � o s W� --- .� _ I ��.. ,.. .. .J .. ,,. .. ', 3 ____ ' , � _. , 7 �___ ;� �. _- .� - � , � , _ _ ' � / .�. � � 5 � _ f 1�'V�f�-Ttt2� , � '��,_. _ � - � � , `EaSENIENT TO � , ,� 2 �.� _ �s� CITY OF TIGARD �=-�� _ TI LI1 ° ry�^` T _ , k _ '/ �� , . : � ` �. � � ,, ` /, l' ,-- � ,_., `"� ._..- _�� ._.:..:. -�•- .�.� J� }.�..�„r. ..tti�a�s'6 _��V li I I 4 �.i��^"�:.- f?` r\!1 S h v-•i,i-.`-. !.... '•� `l .w• f . °y . �. ._-.,._ ,....., .— . � " ' _ / .., _ . . _. , ._ , , . � � i ,� (} rv -'-.........._._.._.."' .`sA �-.�� _. � ::t . --.. ,FY' . .I''M1 J i . r _,k �, �-.:- ,� �is .°W ..I L 77 40' �,, � .� � ,�.. <<_ _._ _ -- �. ♦ TH .x__ ___�_ � a _ � ' ' ..�Y. _.._f..�� ..-.S .-�� '{, 1 � � ... �.... .�.::.:._ ' - . ' 1 ^ . � f � � �. .:, . .__ --- '"__ _. ..;�_____�-9 0`�NVIAT-ER- �,_ _._ �� , , � � SL 0 03 : ---� � - � � .- ._...___,. ...__ :--- - .. �� - _ W f w �_�� ; . ..- a�s ... . _ — ,. - '�� M� � EAS�MENT TO ' - �� __ _ _ __ i�J . . `� e r _ , - ._ � �OO;RDINATE WITH ��, 1r � , CIT?t(OF Tlf:oc�n L " : - `, r �,°. GAS 40MPANY�FQR ` _ e W� I '•,CONNECTION fi �� " ` `?`t��r Flf ; `>� �.._... , , - .__-= e� � a `�' j i J�� _..� { _. i...-�- _.. � _;--— — _.��-�, . �= �� rg+ FII t ,_. .: ,_.� .,� ,,. . . . .. r...__. �_._,___� , . , _. , ti � �TREET '.. . _ :� �. _w.:� ---�; �� ,J � w w, , _ , _ _-:� ; ,;� - �- �.._.. ,� cI _.._.....�,._ ._... .-;:_� �-�.- ,._.-,r, - � ' ...__.,......_._.....- .._..�._� ,�.._�.. � Jf .._.__.-. -_'"'""_....._...�.._��-:_..- C;......__�.-�. . _....�_...:.._�. .._.._...�-,_._-.-,.�.�. y'\ ._ ._.._._..__�_...._....._..___._ ta�4„ �''$� �'J _._.____._._�_..._._..____ ; J �� ------- , •� .�`I 0' 15' 30' 60' � _._ a _ . —� �. — S� F. , ------ _ _ --- � -- � � �.� � �'` �� •i�, ;��r'�� ,'� �� y�`� SCALE: 1" = 30' � ��-� ` .`� �:- � ��;�� - '� ,�� - ,��.' (� �-�- � �� `� �� , � ,�� `� � �Y�� , �, �� „c�„�—t �- � tF �iR-� g''l . . MEMORANDUM TO: Cheryl Caines FROM: Todd Prager, City Arborist RE: Tualatin Valley Fire and Rescue Walnut Street Fire Station DATE: November 19, 2007 As you requested I have provided comments on the "Tualatin Valley Fire and Rescue Walnut Street Fire Station" project. If you have any questions or concerns regarding my comments please contact me anytime. 18.745.030 General Provisions C, Installation Requirements._The installation of all landscaping shall be as follows: 1. A!!landscaping shall be installed according to accepted planting procedures. The accepted planting procedures are the guidelines described in the Tigard Tree Manual. These guidelines follow those set forth by the International Society of Arboriculture (ISA) tree planting guidelines as well as the standards set forth in the American Institute of Architects' Architectural Graphic Standards, 10th edition. In the Architectural Graphic Standards there are guidelines for selecting and planting trees based on the soil volume and size at maturitv. Additionally, there are directions for soil amendments and modifications. 2. The plant material shall be of high grade, and shall meet the size and grading standards of the American Standards for Nurberg Stock (ANSI Z-60, 1-1986, and any other future revisions); and 3. Landscaping shall be installed in accordance with the provisions of this title. D. Certificate of Occupancv. Certificates of occupancy shall not be issued unless the landscaping requirements have been met or other arrangements have been made and approved by the City such as the posting of a bond. The applicant is proposing to retain six out of seven trees over 12" D.B.H. This represents 85% retention of trees over 12". Therefore, they are not required to mitigate and/or post a bond per Tigard Municipal Code. However, the applicant is claiming that tree 2 is exactly 12", and therefore not subject to mitigation requirements. The applicant's tree survey should be accurate to the nearest .1 inches in order to demonstrate that a tree is exactly 12". If a reassessment is not made, then tree 2 should be subject to mitigation. Finally, even if tree 2 is subject to mitigation, then 6 of 8 (75%) trees will be retained. Therefore, the applicant will not have to mitigate anyway. E. Protection of Existinq Landscapin_q. Existing vegetation on a site shall be protected as much as possible: 1. The developer shall provide methods for the profection of existing vegetation to remain during the construction process; and 2. The plants to be saved sha!!be noted on the landscape plans (e.g., areas not to be disturbed can be fenced, as in snow fencing which can be placed around the individual trees). The applicanYs plan set does not show tree protection for those trees to remain during construction. Please have the applicant prepare a tree protection sheet as part of their plan set. The tree protection sheet should follow the project arborist's recommendations, and include a signature of approval from the project arborist. All trees to be preserved that will be in close proximity to construction activities shall be protected with five or six (5' - 6') foot high chain link fences. Fences are to be mounted on two inch diameter galvanized iron posts, driven into the ground to a depth of at least 2-feet at no more than 10-foot spacing. The applicant shall position fencing as directed by the project arborist to protect the trees to be retained. The applicant shall allow access by the City Arborist for the purpose of monitoring and inspection of the tree protection to verify that the tree protection measures are performing adequately. Failure to follow the plan, or maintain tree protection fencing in the designated locations shall be grounds for immediate suspension of work on the site until remediation measures and/or civil citations can be processed. Any tree that is located on property adjacent to the construction project that will have more than 15% of its root system disturbed by construction activities shall also be shown on the plans, and adequately protected. 18.745.040, Street Trees The applicant is proposing to plant Betula jaquemontii. While this tree is not on the street tree list, I can approve it for this situation. B. Street free plantinq list. Certain trees can severely damage utilities, streets and sidewalks or can cause personal injury. Approval of any planting list shall be subject to review by the Director. The accepted planting procedures are the guidelines described in the Tigard Tree Manual. These guidelines follow those set forth by the International Society of Arboriculture (ISA) tree planting guidelines as well as the standards set forth in the American Institute of Architects' Architectural Graphic Standards, 10t" edition. In the Architectural Graphic Standards there are guidelines for selecting and planting trees based on the soil volume and size at maturitv. Additionally, there are directions for soil amendments and modifications. The applicant is proposing to plant Betu/a jaquemonfii. While this tree is not on the street tree list, I can approve it for this situation. 98.745.050, Bufferin_q and Screenin_q E. Screeninq: special provisions. 1. Screening and landscaping of parking and loading areas: a. Screening of parking and loading areas is required. The specifications for this screening are as follows: (1) Landscaped parking areas shall include special design features which effectively screen the parking lot areas from view. These design features may include the use of landscaped berms, decorative walls and raised planters; (2) Landscape planters may be used to define or screen the appearance of off-street parking areas from the public right-of-way; (3) Materials to be installed should achieve a balance between low lying and vertical shrubbery and trees; (4) Trees shall be planted in landscaped islands in all parking areas, and shall be equally distributed and on the basis of one tree for each seven parking spaces in order to provide a canopy effect; and The requirement of one tree for each seven parking spaces has been met. (5) The minimum dimension of the landscape islands shall be three feet and the landscaping shall be protected from vehicular damage by some form of wheel guard or curb. This requirement has been met. 18.790.030, Tree Plan Requirement A. Tree plan required. A tree plan for the planting, removal and protection of trees prepared by a certified arborist shall be provided for any lot, parcel or combination of lots or parcels for which a development application for a subdivision, partition, site development review, planned development or conditional use is filed. Protection is preferred over remova! wherever possib/e. As required, the applicant submitted a tree plan conducted by Ray Myer, a certified arborist. However, while the report contains the four required components, the applicant has not transferred the information to their plan set (See B4 below). B. Plan requirements. The tree plan shall include the following: 1. Identification of the location, size and species of all existing trees including trees designated as significant by the city; This requirement has been met 2. Identification of a program to save existing trees or mitigate tree removal over 12 inches in caliper. Mitigation must follow the replacement guidelines of Section 18.790.060D, in accordance with the following standards and shall be exclusive of trees required by ofher development code provisions for landscaping, streets and parking lots: a. Retention of/ess than 25% of existing trees over 12 inches in caliper requires a mitigation program in accordance with Secfion 18.790.060D of no net/oss of trees; b. Retention of from 25% to 50% of existing trees over 12 inches in caliper requires that two-thirds of the trees to be removed be mitigated in accordance with Section 18.790.060D; c. Retention of from 50% to 75% of existing trees over 12 inches in caliper requires that 50 percent of the trees to be removed be mitigated in accordance with Section 18.790.060D; d. Retention of 75% or greater of existing trees over 12 inches in caliper requires no mitigation. The applicant is proposing to retain six out of seven trees over 12" D.B.H. This represents 85% retention of trees over 12". Therefore, they are not required to mitigate and/or post a bond per Tigard Municipal Code. However, the applicant is claiming that tree 2 is exactly 12", and therefore not subject to mitigation requirements. The applicant's tree survey should be accurate to the nearest .1 inches in order to demonstrate that a tree is exactly 12". If a reassessment is not made, then tree 2 should be subject to mitigation. Finally, even if tree 2 is subject to mitigation, then 6 of 8 (75%) trees will be retained. Therefore, the applicant will not have to mitigate anyway. 3. Identification of all trees which are proposed to be removed; This requirement has been met. 4. A protection program defining standards and methods that will be used by the applicant to protect trees during and after construction. The applicant's plan set does not show tree protection for those trees to remain during construction. Please have the applicant prepare a tree protection sheet as part of their plan set. The tree protection sheet should follow the project arborist's recommendations, and include a signature of approval from the project arborist. All trees to be preserved that will be in close proximity to construction activities shall be protected with five or six (5' - 6') foot high chain link fences. Please have the applicant demonstrate which trees will be protected with plastic and which will be protected with chain link. Fences are to be mounted on two inch diameter galvanized iron posts, driven into the ground to a depth of at least 2-feet at no more than 10-foot spacing. The applicant shall position fencing as directed by the project arborist to protect the trees to be retained. The applicant shall allow access by the City Arborist for the purpose of monitoring and inspection of the tree protection to verify that the tree protection measures are performing adequately. Failure to follow the plan, or maintain tree protection fencing in the designated locations shall be grounds for immediate suspension of work on the site until remediation measures and/or civil citations can be processed. Any tree that is located on property adjacent to the construction project that will have more than 15% of its root system disturbed by construction activities shall also be shown on the plans, and adequately protected. 18.790.040 Incentives for Tree Retention B. Subsequent removal of a tree. Any tree preserved or retained in accordance with this section may thereafter be removed only for the reasons set out in a tree plan, in accordance with Section 18.790.030, or as a condition of approval for a conditiona! use, and shall not be subject to removal under any other section of this chapter. The property owner shall record a deed restriciion as a condition of approval of any development permit affected by this section to the effect that such tree may be removed only if the tree dies or is hazardous according to a certified arborist. The deed restriction may be removed or will be considered invalid if a tree preserved in accordance with this section should either die or be removed as a hazardous tree. The form of this deed restriction shall be subject to approval by the Director. A condition of approval will ensure that this standard is met. 18.790.050 Permit Applicabilitv A. Removal permit required. Tree removal permits shall be required only for the removal of any tree which is located on or in a sensitive land area as defined by Chapter 18.775. The permit for removal of a tree shall be processed as a Type I procedure, as governed by Section 18.390.030, using the following approval criteria: 1. Removal of the tree must not have a measurable negative impact on erosion, soil stability, flow of surface waters or water quality as evidenced by an erosion control plan which precludes: a. Deposits of mud, dirt, sediment or similar material exceeding 1/2 cubic foot in volume on public or private streets, adjacent property, or into the storm and surface water system, either by direct deposit, dropping, discharge or as a result of the action of erosion; b. Evidence of concentrated flows of water over bare soi/s; turbid or sediment-laden flows; or evidence of on-site erosion such as rivulets on bare soil s/opes where the flow of water is not filtered or captured on site using the techniques of Chapter 5 of the Washington County Unified Sewerage Agency Environmental Protection and Erosion Control rules. 2. Within stream or wetland corridors, as defined as 50 feet from the boundary of the stream or wetland, tree removal must maintain no /ess than a 75% canopy cover or no /ess than the existing canopy cover if the existing canopy cover is /ess than 75%. B. Effective date of permit A tree removal permit shall be effective for one and one-half years from the date of approval. C. Extension. Upon written request by the applicant prior to the expiration of the existing permit, a tree removal permit shall be extended for a period of up to one year if the Director finds that the applicant is in compliance with all prior conditions of permit approval and that no material facts stated in the original application have changed. D. Removal permit not required. A tree removal permit shall not be required for the removal of a tree which: 1. Obstructs visual clearance as defined in Chapter 98.795 of the title; 2. Is a hazardous tree; 3. !s a nuisance afiecting public safety as defined in Chapter 7.40 of the Municipa! Code; 4. !s used for Christmas tree production, or land registered with the Washington County Assessor's office as tax-deferred tree farm or small woodlands, but does not stand on sensitive lands. E. Prohibition of commercia! forestry. Commercial forestry as defined by Section 18.790.020 A.2., excluding D.4. above, is not permitted. This requirement does not appear to be applicable to this project. CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL Street Trees The applicant is proposing to plant Betula jaquemontii. While this tree is not on the street tree list, I can approve it for this situation. The accepted planting procedures are the guidelines described in the Tigard Tree Manual. These guidelines follow those set forth by the International Society of Arboriculture (ISA) tree planting guidelines as well as the standards set forth in the American Institute of Architects' Architectural Graphic Standards, 10th edition. In the Architectural Graphic Standards there are guidelines for selecting and planting trees based on the soil volume and size at maturitv. Additionally, there are directions for soil amendments and modifications. Street trees shall be chosen from the City of Tigard's Street Tree List unless otherwise approved by the City Arborist. Tree Mitigation The applicant is proposing to retain six out of seven trees over 12" D.B.H. This represents 85% retention of trees over 12". Therefore, they are not required to mitigate and/or post a bond per Tigard Municipal Code. However, the applicant is claiming that tree 2 is exactly 12", and therefore not subject to mitigation requirements. The applicant's tree survey should be accurate to the nearest .1 inches in order to demonstrate that a tree is exactly 12". If a reassessment is not made, then tree 2 should be subject to mitigation. Finally, even if tree 2 is subject to mitigation, then 6 of 8 (75%) trees will be retained. Therefore, the applicant will not have to mitigate anyway. Tree Protection The applicant's plan set does not show tree protection for those trees to remain during construction. Please have the applicant prepare a tree protection sheet as part of their plan set. The tree protection sheet should follow the project arborist's recommendations, and include a signature of approval from the project arborist. All trees to be preserved that will be in close proximity to construction activities shall be protected with five or six (5' - 6') foot high chain link fences. Fences are to be mounted on two inch diameter galvanized iron posts, driven into the ground to a depth of at least 2-feet at no more than 10-foot spacing. The applicant shall position fencing as directed by the project arborist to protect the trees to be retained. The applicant shall allow access by the City Arborist for the purpose of monitoring and inspection of the tree protection to verify that the tree protection measures are performing adequately. Failure to follow the plan, or maintain tree protection fencing in the designated locations shall be grounds for immediate suspension of work on the site until remediation measures and/or civil citations can be processed. Any tree that is located on property adjacent to the construction project that will have more than 15% of its root system disturbed by construction activities shall also be shown on the plans, and adequately protected. If work is required within an established tree protection zone, the project arborist shall prepare a proposal detailing the construction techniques to be employed and the likely impacts to the trees. The proposal shall be reviewed and approved by the City Arborist before proposed work can proceed within a tree protection zone. The City Arborist may require changes prior to approval. The project arborist shall be on site while work is occurring within the tree protection zone and submit a summary report certifying that the work occurred per the proposal and will not significantly impact the health and/or stability of the trees. • If the Builder is different from the Developer or initial applicant.� Prior to issuance of building permits, the applicant shall submit site plan drawings indicating the locations of trees that were preserved on the lot during site development. In addition, the plans shall include accurate locations of tree canopy driplines and protection fencing, and a signature of approval from the project arborist regarding the placement and construction techniques to be employed in building the structures. All proposed protection fencing shall be installed and inspected prior to commencing construction. The fencing shall remain in place through the duration of all of the building construction phases, until the Certificate of Occupancy has been approved. After approval from the City Arborist, the tree protection measures may be removed. The applicant shall have an on-going responsibility to ensure that the Project Arborist has submitted written reports to the City Arborist, at least once every two weeks, as the Project Arborist monitors the construction activities from initial tree protection zone (TPZ) fencing installation through the building construction phases. The reports shall evaluate the condition and location of the tree protection fencing, determine if any changes occurred to the TPZ, and if any part of the Tree Protection Plan has been violated. If the amount of TPZ was reduced, then the Project Arborist shall justify why the fencing was moved and shall certify that the construction activities did not adversely impact the overall, long-term health and stability of the tree(s). If the reports are not submitted to the City Arborist at the scheduled intervals, and if it appears the TPZ's or the Tree Protection Plan are not being followed by the contractor or a sub-contractor, the City can stop work on the project until an inspection can be done by the City Arborist and the Project Arborist. Prior to issuance of any Certificates of Occupancy, the Project Arborist will submit a final certification indicating the elements of the Tree Protection Plan were followed and that all remaining trees on the site are healthy, stable, and viable in their modified growing environment. Deed Restriction Prior to issuance of any Certificates of Occupancy, the applicant/owner shall record deed restrictions to the effect that any existing tree greater than 6" diameter may be removed only if the tree dies or is hazardous according to a certified arborist. The deed restriction may be removed or will be considered invalid if a tree preserved in accordance with this decision should either die or be removed as a hazardous tree. CleanWater Services O�ii ��, ,,,ii,iii� �r� ,• �. . � MEMORANDUM DATE: November 20, 2007 FROM: David Schweitzer, Clean Water Services TO: Cheryl Caines, Associate Planner City of Tigard SUBJECT: Review Comments—CUP 2007-00003 TVFRD Walnut Station GENERAL COMMENTS ■ This Land Use Review by Clean Water Services (District) does not constitute approval of storm or sanitary sewer compliance with the NPDES permit held by the District. The District, prior to issuance of any connection permit, must review and approve final construction plans. ■ All provisions of the development submittal shall be in accordance with Clean Water Services (CWS) Design and Construction Standards, presently Resolution and Order No. 07- 20 (R&O 07-20), and all current Intergovernmental Agreements between the City and CWS. ■ Final construction plans must be reviewed by CWS for conformance with R&O 07-20 and a Stormwater Connection Permit must be authorized by the District prior to construction. ■ A Stormwater Connection Permit shall be required prior to construction of sanitary sewer, storm and surface water systems, and final plat approval. ■ All public sanitary and storm easements shall be shown on the final construction plans. �ANiTARY SEWER ■ The project as proposed may connect to the existing 8" sanitary line at existing SSMH City ID SS4A122. On final plans, label all existing SS and SD manholes with City ID numbers. STORM DRAINAGE AND WATER QUALITY ■ The project shall be provided with an individual connection to a public storm conveyance. A cursory review of the preliminary plans attached to the Request for Comments indicates a private storm system with a private water quality/quantity facility. If designing the facility to CWS standards: Ensure the outflow pads are sized in accordance with R&O 07-20 table 5-5. Ensure the planting meets Appendix A requirements, and that a list of plant types, sizes of plants and numbers Z550 SW Hiilsboro Highway • Hilisboro, Oregon 97123 Phone: (503) 681-3600 • Fax: (503) 681-3603 •www.CleanWaterServices.org . , CleanWater Services � ,��, � � �,,,�. � „ ; � � � of plant types are on the final construction plans. Ensure that suitable maintenance access to pond structures is provided per chapter 4.02. ■ Final construction plans shall show all existing and proposed public and private storm conveyance and easements. SENSITIVE AREA ■ Service Provider Letter(SPL) 07-002492 was issued on August 13, 2007 and amended October 18, 2007 for this project on Tax/Map lot 2S1 04AD-04500. All provisions and requirements of the SPL shall be followed on the plans. SPL conditions 21-24 shall be included/illustrated on the final plan set. EROSION CONTROL ■ If the improvements disturb 1-acre or more; site improvements and any improvements within the public Right Of Way, a NPDES 1200-C Permit is required. ■ Provide erosion control in accordance with the current CWS design and construction standards. 2550 SW Hillsboro Highway • Hillsboro, Oregon 97123 Phone: (503)681-3600 • Fax: (503)681-3603 • www.CleanWaterServices.org Cheryl Caines From: Mischa Connine [Mischa.A.Connine@state.or.us] Sent: Thursday, November 29, 2007 7:50 PM To: Cheryl Caines Subject: RE: Tualatin Valley Fire & Rescue Walnut Station Attachments: image001.jpg Hi Cheryl, Thank you for checking on the status of the trail for me. With that information, I do not anticipate any adverse effects from the proposed project. I appreciate you extending the comment period for me. If you have any questions, please let me know. Mischa From: Cheryl Caines [mailto:cherylc@tigard-or.gov] Sent: Thursday, November 29, 2007 4:51 PM To: 'Mischa Connine' Subject: RE: Tualatin Valley Fire &Rescue Walnut Station Mischa, Our Parks division is hoping to construct a bridge across the creek that provides an access to Jack Park from Walnut Street, but no path along the creek is planned at this time. Cheryl From: Mischa Connine [mailto:Mischa.A.Connine@state.or.us] Sent: Thursday, November 29, 2007 4:43 PM To: Cheryl Caines Subject: RE: Tualatin Valley Fire & Rescue Walnut Station Thanks, Cheryl. I know there is no trail proposed for this project. I was interested in future possible trail plans because that could trigger a larger buffer. Thank you for finding out from the Park Manager. I will wait to hear back from you regarding that. Other than that, there are no red flags that jump out from the proposal. Thanks again. Mischa Mischa Connine Habitat Biologist North Willamette Watershed District 18330 NW Sauvie Island Road Portland, OR 97231 (503) 621-3488 ext 28 Fax: (503) 621-3025 � Mischa.A.ConnineCc�state.or.us From: Cheryl Caines [mailto:cherylc@tigard-or.gov] Sent: Wednesday, November 28, 2007 9:22 AM To: 'Mischa Connine' Subject: RE: Tualatin Valley Fire & Rescue Walnut Station Mischa, The last plan was to do a Lot Line Adjustment to make the sensitive area part of Jack Park to the north. A trail is shown on the master trail plan, but our planner that deals with trails did not know of any immediate plans to construct a trail. I've got a call into our Parks Manager to double check. There is no plan for a trail with this development. If a trail is constructed, it would most likely be a City project on City property. Cheryl From: Mischa Connine [mailto:Mischa.A.Connine@state.or.us] Sent: Tuesday, November Z7, 2007 5:00 PM To: Cheryl Caines Subject: Tualatin Valley Fire & Rescue Walnut Station Hi Cheryl, Thank you for allowing me some additional time for providing comments for this proposal. Do you know if there are future plans of adding a trail through the buffer area on this site? Thank you. Mischa Mischa Connine Habitat Biologist North Willamette Watershed District 18330 NW Sauvie Island Road Portland, OR 97231 (503) 621-3488 ext 28 Fax: (503)621-3025 Mischa.A.ConnineCa�state.or.us z . WF,TLAND LAND USE NOTIFICATION FORM � (this fo is to be compl� ' only by planning department staff for m� �d wetlands/waterways) DEPARTMENT OF STATE LANDS WETLANDS PROGRAM side o Cascades,send to: 775 Summer Street NE, Suite 100;Salem,OR 97301-1279;(503)378-3805 O East side of Cascades,send to: 1645 NE Forbes Rd., Suite 112 Bend,OR 97701;(541)388-6112 ounty: N�Sh�i��%�� LocalCaseFile#: Ci,u��eo-7-co�c>3�S�.�a;-ccn��fl�doc�7 Uau 3�: City: -1-'; G•�rci DSL File#: WN (comnleted bv DSL Staffl Responsible Jurisdiction: � City ❑ County DSL PrOjeCt#: �ompleted by DSL Staffl 2. APPLICANT: �:��,la�;,� �ra(�e�, Fi:-t d- �e�iC.�e. LANDOWNER: `��rne� name name a��5 S�.: 3ia�-�. Sf . mailing address mailing address �41ah�ti. GFZ �`7i:v"7 city, state zip city,state zip (5�� )l�-ya - D331 ( ) - phone phone 3. LOCATION T �� R��i� S�(� '/4 � � Tax Lot(s) ��C� Address(street/city) 1a5� 5�:� t-c1�ln,,�.t �- . NWI quad map name 4. ATTACHMENTS Attach all the following(with site marked): •LWI/NWI Map (if no LWI map) .Parcel Map . Site Plan (if any) If applicable attach: ❑ Other 5. SITE INFORMATION LWI/NWI Wetland Classification Codes(s) I�E M , F� Adj acent Waterway(if any) �r�e u.�e r G`�e.a-K- Zoning {� - �.s 6. PROPOSED ACTIVITY ❑ site plan approval ❑ subdivision ❑Other ❑grading permit ❑planned unit development � conditional use permit ❑building permit(new structures) Project Description Lo��5kruc+- �z_. r��w -�i r 2 S�c�-�i e.-, . S-�v r,� ,,,;«a-ti oui�er (f In;i V�'�'-k:�2 a,r, r . Completed by/Contact Ch�r� � Ga;n e S Date �U -l6-0 7 E-Mail Che�Y l c � ��1��b� Address i�1�5 ,;�J i�all 3�ad T�� pR �17�2a23 Phone: (5�•3 ) `7i t3 - �2`�3`7 DSL RESPONSE ❑A removal-fill permit is required from the Department of State Lands ❑A removal-fill permit will be required when the development project proceeds ❑A removal-fill permit may be required ❑A permit may be required by the Corps of Engineers (503-808-4373) ❑Information needed includes: ❑A wetland determination/delineation report ❑ ❑ State Permit# ❑ was issued ❑has been applied for ❑No removal-fill permit is required for the described project if/because: Comments: ❑ On-Site Visit By: Date: Response completed by: Date: * If the project is changed to involve fill or removal from the wetlands area,a state removal-fill permit will be required. http://www.oregonstatelands.us/wetlanduse.htm January 2007 - �. .�r� ., _ . .::...�,:; a-:•. •---- � - - .�- . � - - . . ■.�, � : , �i■:.�. .. . �■;:i�■ � / , �- ;,��r�i � ' � . �-.• . . � ■..■■''��'! .■ � ��r�� : �► :..��. � �� . . �� ■• ■ ■ �� .��.. ��11�1� ��►��i��i��: : :�►�� :�"��i�;:% j/�� --, _ � � , i�11 ��i i � � � � � 1 . . �i� � ��<!�� ■ ��i •i�y�� , � 11� , �� , ,. ,._�.�,,.-- -�,,��, :� =r �..,� � ..,..., �� • ...�..,... _� . . . . - �� .•�;►,.— . -�� _�� . ,p y►• ,. �,�.., ♦ 1 'p�'� � .��. � ��:''wii `.• : �•�• �a,� �i ��• ■�, �� ■, ••� �:�� ` / LIII • .� , �� ♦ ; �;:; ;;;.= ,, �;�,,;,;•.� : :.•_ ...... �=.•i�"' '�` :•a�:T�i `',�•r ��.��► i� ••. � ►�.:,. C .-■p: �1. ; � �If1�:�::I�� II� �• '; • �, �� i��1 �� • a 11 � - - - � � � �I�a ��/ � : � � I • �� -��I .,.,., • _ ��r_�� •O �, :•..� � .� ■ ■ �■■. '��rEllli :•�►! ��ii��'. . _ •.� � _ �t��i � r�� i�'��1 �:� : s..� �� .�:��j�.��. �,�� : j� � �� S �"'�`yi�■ i��i�1 iiiill . � � �F� � �, �-- . . . _ �� ` � •1�� N�� 1.� �� T�, _� ��1�;,� �' � � � � �� 1 1�� r,r�� g��/C � 11� �.��/�/�1�1� i-, i''� � � � 1 � . �� ■ � ��%'l1 ��i� � '-��` = :.-.:� = � '� �� ,, � .r.,.1�,. '. � - � 'IR?!f'. r ��_- � _ —� , . �� ;,.�--•• .. ♦ � _ ��►��i.'I �-�■ �� ■�• � �l.�J . � � �i� � , �.�r��__ ►;I .�ii�� •• �� -� ■�-� 1,.� rl� �:I�: : . � I�rr � �� . ; �� 1111,�',��,�,�1 %: ��ii'iiii' i�� .��. � � 1 ■' - � �; �� "_`i �� / � �' ' "�� ", �J � . �� , r_ .IIIII I .. ■ � .� ... a�,,� _ -�,y_ �ii��i... ::.. .� 1 .. °-�.- V ► ■ �r::, ��i�� '�� i� � � v ��1�� .■ �� : �� .�. - , � � �;�� ;� ��►L "�� ■ Sr �� ,r��i � � � �� , - , . �! ��i�.�� /i�� °��^�� t'�� a ��// i /IIIZ ��i►�� ♦ � "' �� S ♦ �� :�..�� I��i��►� ��;� �� •�� ii::�j�� Iy�� a�� •� �;�� ■ � ��%, � �� r` ,��/1/� ��/�/ •� �,��,r� --- � �� '�� 1 � �•:�� --,' � � � ♦ �� `�111��'•i �I`,,��,,�'�� ' �� /��/� � -�,. ,�* /,�;. -�. ��•, �r��■ ��,� � � • ��.� �. �.. �ii : ��i�' 1111�� +� ��•'��11 i� ��:i sI��11� '�Il��i�� r�r♦ �.�� . � �C�ii �� • � ��t.� �,�� -��- � �� -�� `� .. . ...' ' ► .� ��/1�' .: ..► ��I��IIIII� � . . � � �� €. � /IIIIIII.. ��11�I � � €� � ��III�►�j �I�I� �/�11�%�II►��I►��-/= ��■■i �i ,,.,� '� �►�� i��ir�r�� a�i��1111111�� Ii� �•w==�==�= �,Ci ' � � (�f��- �r � ��'��111� �i��1 �1111!%�1�� .�. . _� I..� � � --- -- .. :I��I��IK�cp � � �� . � �\...�__�� '� , I �• _� 1,�: � ' g�. r_ ,,:�......_..� � r �*��:� .�� 1��u'We�ir. .....�.�..�1�� -• • �� ,a ��i� i1:a:�� e t .• �� Ir.:. � � j � � . . �� ...... • � . �,: �S E � ■ ■■ � --�, �� "� : .�� / �/�7��.�l��■�� ■ � �� `. �� / \ � . -, ,�:�-��-■ ► � �--- � , �� ►ir� i�� "-�.�� a � �� . ��.■ � , . � �j� �� ./� . a �I �,, � �!!'��''::;.',:-.� ��=�i•1':��:�:: ' �� !: !� �� i�: �� ■ � '��% �i: �� •�i��..�:■�■� _ � ,■%� ,� � .� �� '' � �� • 1/� �� !�" ► ��I�� I�� ' ��<*�j�i �i��►�� v'i� Ii��j�� A�� •.� �� .�j 1 D��i�� : �� iQ1ii� ,,•�� :�� • ,�� . �I� � ��/ �� G��i ��►�i� �� • , .l::�...,-� � ��. � i��f�r!�.:.;,_. �:�:... � � � ,�, �� ■..�i • - - . ..I�� ,�r ■ .■ .■ �� .� ♦ �I• ...; � � � - 1r =1 . i� ��N� �,, ��:: :��:��ii + :r��i�� r� R� � 1� ,� � � ■ � ... , . - � - 1�1��/� ■ :..x�,■.: T�� ♦ ..�� • � 1■ �l •::r'1��. /� . . ,111.■.- •�'n'•��•��,�� A ��T . •.� .,y� ■_■ _.■'1"" "'�. �I,� • • • . • • • • • � . . �� •�� ::-�•,;�:.•...,, ;� ��=:;� � ;� ; � . ,�� :�= ::illl ��11� ' �i �� . . . . � . . . . � �1■ � .. . 1■ ` . . . - , � : r►i/ .� .� ��r � �� ./ i� � ■� ..... ��,,�°` • . . . . . . ��. : :�i� �„ !�i- "��' �•�-�� , , . 1�1� '� � � ■ ��/�'� /�� •�.� � �. ��.� �., . .-.1 �,• �� 1■1 ;,��,��.. . . . - . . 1 „ �� ■ •�� . � r ..�e�...� .. 1 ��■r ..I I � 3 ■ ■■■.� 111 ► .- ��11� ► ► / ! / � - . . . . . - - � . . . Is . �. � . � , �� ` . ■ •J'� ;�;� �� I .; ��,1��11 ��= :� •�' .•• • � � � u� � � �"� ♦ . � � � �.., 1 1.��► �. . ■. .� � ; r . ■ ■ � = ' .r.ri..r1� � � ��!>,� .1 • • . . . � � � ��..�1�� :�. �� `�� ` . . - . . � ' . ,�.�11 ` .� ►.=■��i . . . - - !=i �� i�� 11 � �r . • .Lr ��o��i �� / r._. . r � .� ��.�■� �, � . . � �� r � ��. �1��II� �� .�� 11� �� 1 � �► �� ,� �� . • ��i��'�'� � � � � ��:► � �� ..�:;�,,�,s� ■ � 1�� 1 �� ./ �,� ■ � ■ ■ . �*�!.....► � r111/1 ., �� • `��.. .illllli■ ■ �� .. ••..... , ■ �� ..�� '�� •• r►r �. , � �- ■�.�� •.. .. �„ . � ��: �� . .�..■ �IIIIII�■ ■■� . . ��::,�� ! �' �� .� � �.:-�� ■■�■.� /�I��1 ♦ � ��j ,�! _ ■ ��"'� � � :�� :7: �r � ��'� � � � �� ,�♦ �' � � � � ��'� i i�i��11��'� ��r►II►�� ♦ �� .� ♦ � � � �� , �� .��• •- ��•��•� ♦ 1'�� i �� • �r�` �s�■.��i' . : � � ♦ � � ,�� C� .�� ■ ■ . . Z $/ 1S�' �^ , ,,�16 m $, ,� ......6 ^:I = � 2s�osas W �.� , � . ,, �`'S ., ., ., ,' '.. � � � � �. � i .ao ��.a�< , �;'� �w�'� Y � ` .,.�, ' ' .t�o:oo �� °° 59 0 70.OD ��' � , �� V rn Q �oo.00 ' � 'zoe.a�<, � � - "� � � zsrooae � � N ' ��oo.00� � 7s.00 �'� �='� � •`� 500 �� f o��_ 'NS�-2B-OOW' � . g �� o� (�' 153.97 � �-_ ; ¢ 97 � 5, c�. � � �4 �� \ 309.57 �� : '�� 03B9 � C\ m J 157.30 100. o o � 4�0 � 488JO �'-- -=�-r� o' � a m. �60 �� ro - �� 300 � 11 e`•°�� ;' ,a � a„_ o �� 12 ^� � ' o zsiosse '. �� 1° ,�wo.00'� � � �� o�� 4 4 � , ."W 16�. � 13 �� 9 6 36, � � � �.m� i ' � � .,o ,� a6 3 0� ' 500 4501 � �. . � � ��' _ao.00 �a.��e;y �° ��,� 10 1.2oAC _-- - °�B� Q . �j� t=- � SW MAR1E CT �� ,.9 =� � ,� � 2 m � 3 ,m � � oo. 00 ��- -- �3.� � a�� , r (� �9 �ao.00- - 2s.�� a �� 3 i,� , �"�� : � �� A 90� ��b� �� _ �11 .00-' 25703AC � � �ry 90� n Q �3B 37 63 600 � � ' � ��' ' � �� m 6 � 9 " p 2S1038C� °i 'o a � ar. \ � \ b ; p �4800 : i -. �. �. p �W . � 100.00 � � v �- � 2 � :� � p , 0 > m ' p, � . -� aoo � �,� 4500 ,�X 0 g 1000 � �� 701 �� 3.28AC ' '�eood ` 3 �°, �� p', ��oe_ a r-�� .� n 5 � � 4 8 a �� 2sY038d , ��,� �� '�a�` � -- 100.01 �o � � 470D,, .. ,4A, ro�9 ,�� 50' 8B.05 ��5.00� . 141. \ / - o . . � . . .�ry :��' 78.00 75.00 y� I a � � __�� 1100 � �� I �� n i° 4 a 123� I 1300 0 1400 0 ; , \/0g ,., w tiy��Q� �� 2 $ � o; ��q�� `'� N 'r �� 65.14 I " ._ . / /?� �` �� z d ° 75.00 =_----�" - . \ ° 75.00 � 77.03 ---� (�� ,��0� . �4200 B "`��`� ``��v:�'�`�� _�- � � ; -:" � � � A\\\\\\\\\�\\\\\\\\\\�� .�... - - ., ��,, • �/ =�� 1 � G ' �AV\,.A'��`. - - - •- - - --- ,� ��. A L N U T ..,,,,�,��,,.��,�, � 3 � - p / � 200573084 � � °� 1 � BE6•��338 ��8�� .5�038C'� � � �f STREET � � ,�� ,. r � 2005-19827 2005- - �/ � � . • . 2 ` ---- o �•1 114.00 -- I H308 2005-7294 � 2005-7293 -� Sf03BG � 1 � .� 2 � . Q.00 95- 0--- 3p' 20' 84.20 �. 4000 �� l� � ti, ._,C � ` ��l�� 100.00 40.71 50.00 -- --- - - -- -- 2005-14480 20 729 ':� 8400 � i _ T- � g 158.10 ��- � � , � 3500 g I I '�°� �! .�� z.ea o '° ° �'� �;<,��t�ec _� �� +� � --� �2srav .27AC � I I � ° °o� o :�' 70100.," �� ,�� `�e'�' � 8500 i� � 3700 o r. 3�900 °0 4000 0°' 30� ;� >' 1S �x '`'o �o�. i 3 I I� � e c .e�ac �o ;�03� . .� .o� �-z 174.00 _ I i .32AC n .11 C 4400 ��- y�10pq0 = � eB00 - - ICS 19.2051 I �n AA AC� * . •01�'..� • �7•��1Q�� fq a\1 ,:3 � � MEMORANDUM CITY OF TIGARD, OREGON DATE: 12/03/07 TO: Cheryl Caines, Associate Planner FROM: Kim McMillan, Development Review Engine�� RE: CUP2007-00003 TVF�R Walnut Station Access Manaqement (Section 18.705.030.H) Section 18.705.030.H.1 states that an access report shall be submitted with all new development proposals which verifies design of driveways and streets are safe by meeting adequate stacking needs, sight distance and deceleration standards as set by ODOT, Washington County, the City and AASHTO. DKS Associates prepared a Transportation Impact Analysis, dated July 2007, for the proposed development. The proposed project would add 9 vehicle trips in the AM peak hour and 16 vehicle trips in the PM peak hour. The engineer states that this additional traffic combined with future background traffic growth with the study area would not have a significant operational impact at any of the study intersections during the peak periods analyzed. All study intersections would meet the City's intersection performance standards during each of the peak periods analyzed. A Supplemental Driveway Sight Distance Information, dated November 29, 2007, was also submitted by DKS Associates. The posted speed along this section of Walnut Street is 30 mph. However, the 85th percentile speed on Walnut Street in the westbound direction is 40 mph and is 43 mph in the eastbound direction. Therefore, 400 feet of sight distance is required from the proposed westerly driveway to the east. Based on field measurements taken on November 13, 2007, there is 390 feet of sight distance available from the estimated location of the westerly driveway looking east. According to the engineer, there is a short wood fence that creates the sight distance obstruction. If a portion of the fence is removed there would be 405 feet of sight distance available which would meet the sight distance requirement. If the fence obstruction is removed, then a shed will create the sight distance obstruction at 405 feet. If the driver's eye is moved to eight feet from the curb (instead of the required ten feet from the curb) then there would be 410 feet of sight distance without moving the fence. The available sight distance to the west is approximately 800 feet, thereby meeting the standard. ENGINEERING COMMENTS CUP2007-00003 NF&R Walnut Station PAGE 1 The applicant shall, as recommended by DKS Associates, work with the adjacent property owner to remove a portion of the wood fence located approximately 55 feet east of the project site to obtain a minimum 400 feet of sight distance from the proposed westerly driveway. Upon completion of the public improvements and prior to the final building inspection the applicant's engineer shall submit a final sight distance certification for the westerly driveway. Section 18.705.030.H.3 and 4 states that the minimum spacing of driveways and streets along a collector shall be 200 feet. The minimum spacing of driveways and streets along an arterial shall be 600 feet. The minimum spacing vf local streets along a local street shall be 125 feet. The project proposes three access/egress points on Walnut Street. The eastern most access point is for emergency vehicles and fire station employees only. The center driveway is for emergency vehicles exiting the site only and would be controlled by an emergency vehicle traffic signal. The western driveway will provide access and egress for visitors and exit only for fire station employees. Walnut Street is classified as a Collector on the City of Tigard's Transportation Systems Plan. This requires a minimum 200 foot spacing standard. This standard cannot be met and serve the needs of the fire station, therefore the applicant has applied for an adjustment to the spacing standard in accordance with 18.370. Street And Utility Improvements Standards (Section 18.8101: Chapter 18.810 provides construction standards for the implementation of public and private facilities and utilities such as streets, sewers, and drainage. The applicable standards are addressed below: Streets: Improvements: Section 18.810.030.A.1 states that streets within a development and streets adjacent shall be improved in accordance with the TDC standards. Section 18.810.030.A.2 states that any new street or additional street width planned as a portion of an existing street shall be dedicated and improved in accordance with the TDC. Minimum Rights-of-Way and Street Widths: Section 18.810.030.E requires a Collector street to have a 70 foot right-of-way width and 46-foot paved ENGINEERING COMMENTS CUP2007-00003 NF8�R Walnut Station PAGE 2 section. Other improvements required may include on-street parking, sidewalks and bikeways, underground utilities, street lighting, storm drainage, and street trees. This site lies adjacent to SW Walnut Street, which is classified as a Collector on the City of Tigard Transportation Plan Map. At present, there is approximately 35 feet of ROW from centerline along most of the frontage, according to the most recent tax assessor's map. The applicant should dedicate the additional ROW to provide 35 feet from centerline at the east and west ends of the property frontage. SW Walnut Street is currently improved to approximately 22 feet from centerline with a 5 foot planter strip and 6 foot sidewalk. Street Alignment and Connections: Section 18.810.030.H.1 states that full street connections with spacing of no more than 530 feet between connections is required except where prevented by barriers such as topography, railroads, freeways, pre-existing developments, lease provisions, easements, covenants or other restrictions existing prior to May 1, 1995 which preclude street connections. A full street connection may also be exempted due to a regulated water feature if regulations would not permit construction. Section 18.810.030.H.2 states that all local, neighborhood routes and collector streets which abut a development site shall be extended within the site to provide through circulation when not precluded by environmental or topographical constraints, existing development patterns or strict adherence to other standards in this code. A street connection or extension is precluded when it is not possible to redesign, or reconfigure the street pattern to provide required extensions. Land is considered topographically constrained if the slope is greater than 15°/a for a distance of 250 feet or more. In the case of environmental or topographical constraints, the mere presence of a constraint is not sufficient to show that a street connection is not possible. The applicant must show why the constraint precludes some reasonable street connection. There are no opportunities for street connections through this development due to streams and City park lands. Block Designs - Section 18.810.040.A states that the length, width and shape of blocks shall be designed with due regard to providing adequate building sites for the use contemplated, consideration of needs for convenient access, circulation, control and safety of street traffic and recognition of limitations and opportunities of topography. ENGINEERING COMMENTS CUP2007-00003 TVF&R Walnut Station PAGE 3 Block Sizes: Section 18.810.040.B.1 states that the perimeter of blocks formed by streets shall not exceed 1,800 feet measured along the right-of- way line except: • Where street location is precluded by natural topography, wetlands or other bodies of water or, pre-existing development or; • For blocks adjacent to arterial streets, limited access highways, major collectors or railroads. • For non-residential blocks in which internal public circulation provides equivalent access. PLANNING Section 18.810.040.B.2 also states that bicycle and pedestrian connections on public easements or right-of-ways shall be provided when full street connection is not possible. Spacing between connections shall be no more than 330 feet, except where precluded by environmental or topographical constraints, existing development patterns, or strict adherence to other standards in the code. PLANNING Lots - Size and Shape: Section 18.810.060(A) prohibits lot depth from being more than 2.5 times the average lot width, unless the parcel is less than 1.5 times the minimum lot size of the applicable zoning district. PLANNING Lot Frontage: Section 18.810.060(B) requires that lots have at least 25 feet of frontage on public or private streets, other than an alley. In the case of a land partition, 18.420.050.A.4.c applies, which requires a parcel to either have a minimum 15-foot frontage or a minimum 15-foot wide recorded access easement. In cases where the lot is for an attached single-family dwelling unit, the frontage shall be at least 15 feet. PLANNING Sidewalks: Section 18.810.070.A requires that sidewalks be constructed to meet City design standards and be located on both sides of arterial, collector and local residential streets. Private streets and industrial streets shall have sidewalks on at least one side. There is an existing sidewalk along Walnut Street, thereby meeting this criterion. ENGINEERING COMMENTS CUP2007-00003 TVF&R Walnut Station PAGE 4 Sanitary Sewers: Sewers Required: Section 18.810.090.A requires that sanitary sewer be installed to serve each new development and to connect developments to existing mains in accordance with the provisions set forth in Design and Construction Standards for Sanitary and Surface Water Management (as adopted by Clean Water Services in 1996 and including any future revisions or amendments) and the adopted policies of the comprehensive plan. Over-sizing: Section 18.810.090.0 states that proposed sewer systems shall include consideration of additional development within the area as projected by the Comprehensive Plan. There is an existing 8 inch public sewer line in SW Walnut Street. The applicanYs plans indicate they will install one sanitary sewer lateral to serve the development. Storm Drainage: General Provisions: Section 18.810.100.A requires developers to make adequate provisions for storm water and flood water runoff. Accommodation of Upstream Drainage: Section 18.810.100.0 states that a culvert or other drainage facility shall be large enough to accommodate potential runoff from its entire upstream drainage area, whether inside or outside the development. The City Engineer shall approve the necessary size of the facility, based on the provisions of Design and Construction Standards for Sanitary and Surface Water Management (as adopted by Clean Water Services in 2000 and including any future revisions or amendments). The site is adjacent to Kreuger Creek, which accommodates upstream drainage. Effect on Downstream Drainage: Section 18.810.100.D states that where it is anticipated by the City Engineer that the additional runoff resulting from the development will overload an existing drainage facility, the Director and Engineer shall withhold approval of the development until provisions have been made for improvement of the potential condition or until provisions have been made for storage of additional runoff caused by the development in accordance with the Design and Construction Standards for Sanitary and SurFace Water Management (as adopted by Clean Water Services in 2000 and including any future revisions or amendments). ENGINEERING COMMENTS CUP2007-00003 NF&R Walnut Station PAGE 5 In 1997, Clean Water Services (CWS) completed a basin study of Fanno Creek and adopted the Fanno Creek Watershed Management Plan. Section V of that plan includes a recommendation that local governments institute a stormwater detention/effective impervious area reduction program resulting in no net increase in storm peak flows up to the 25-year event. The City will require that all new developments resulting in an increase of impervious surfaces provide onsite detention facilities, unless the development is located adjacent to Fanno Creek. For those developments adjacent to Fanno Creek, the storm water runoff will be permitted to discharge without detention. The applicant's plans indicate they will construct an on-site detention pond upstream of Kreuger Creek. The site stormwater runoff will be collected, detained in the pond and then released into the wetland buffer before flowing overland into Kreuger Creek. Bikeways and Pedestrian Pathways: Bikeway Extension: Section 18.810.110.A states that developments adjoining proposed bikeways identified on the City's adopted pedestrian/bikeway plan shall include provisions for the future extension of such bikeways through the dedication of easements or right-of-way. SW Walnut Street is a designated bicycle facility. The bicycle striping and markings are already in place. The applicant shall replace all striping and markings removed or damaged during construction of the three driveways. Utilities: Section 18.810.120 states that all utility lines, but not limited to those required for electric, communication, lighting and cable television services and related facilities shall be placed underground, except for surface mounted transformers, surface mounted connection boxes and meter cabinets which may be placed above ground, temporary utility service facilities during construction, high capacity electric lines operating at 50,000 volts or above, and: • The developer shall make all necessary arrangements with the serving utility to provide the underground services; • The City reserves the right to approve location of all surface mounted facilities; • All underground utilities, including sanitary sewers and storm drains installed in streets by the developer, shall be constructed prior to the surfacing of the streets; and • Stubs for service connections shall be long enough to avoid disturbing the street improvements when service connections are made. ENGINEERING COMMENTS CUP2007-00003 NFBR Walnut Station PAGE 6 Exception to Under-Grounding Requirement: Section 18.810.120.0 states that a developer shall pay a fee in-lieu of under-grounding costs when the development is proposed to take place on a street where existing utilities which are not underground will serve the development and the approval authority determines that the cost and technical difficulty of under- grounding the utilities oufinreighs the benefit of under-grounding in conjunction with the development. The determination shall be on a case- by-case basis. The most common, but not the only, such situation is a short frontage development for which under-grounding would result in the placement of additional poles, rather than the removal of above-ground utilities facilities. An applicant for a development which is served by utilities which are not underground and which are located across a public right-of-way from the applicant's property shall pay a fee in-lieu of under- grounding. There are existing overhead utility lines along the frontage of SW Walnut Street. If the fee in-lieu is approved by the City Engineer, it is equal to $ 35.00 per lineal foot of street frontage that contains the overhead lines. The frontage along this site is 465 lineal feet; therefore the fee would be $ 16,275.00. ADDITIONAL CITY AND/OR AGENCY CONCERNS WITH STREET AND UTILITY IMPROVEMENT STANDARDS: Traffic Studv Findinqs: DKS Associates prepared a Transportation Impact Analysis, dated July 2007, for the proposed development. The proposed project would add 9 vehicle trips in the AM peak hour and 16 vehicle trips in the PM peak hour. The engineer states that this additional traffic combined with future background traffic growth with the study area would not have a significant operational impact at any of the study intersections during the peak periods analyzed. All study intersections would , meet the City's intersection performance standards during each of the peak periods analyzed. The engineer identified several transportation mitigations for the proposed project. Based on the operations analysis conducted for the proposed project, no off-site deficiencies were identified. Project related on-site mitigation measures include: 1) an emergency vehicle traffic signal is recommended at the proposed central driveway on SW Walnut Street; 2) relocate the west access approximately 10 feet to the west to align with the residential driveway across SW Walnut Street to reduce potential conflicts befinreen vehicles turning left into these driveways; and 3) there are significant speeding issues on Walnut Street, with the 85th percentile speed at more than 10 miles an hour higher than the posted speed. Traffic calming methods such as increased speed limit ENGINEERING COMMENTS CUP2007-00003 NF8�R Walnut Station PAGE 7 enforcement should be implemented to reduce vehicle speeds and potentiai safety issues. The applicant shall install an emergency vehicle traffic signal at the central driveway on SW Walnut Street. The signal shall be operational prior to final building inspection. The applicant shall revise the construction plans to relocate the west access approximately 10 feet to the west to align with the residential driveway across SW Walnut Street. Fire and Life Safetv: Tualatin Valley Fire and Rescue submitted comments on November 20, 2007. The fire district will do the worksheet and calculate the required fire flow. The fire hydrant on the northwest corner of the SW Walnut Street and SW 124cn Avenue meets the hydrant distance requirement. Three fire hydrants are required for this project. The fire hydrant shown on the submitted drawings across SW Walnut Street from the subject property does not contribute to the required number of fire hydrants because SW Walnut is a col lector. An additional fire hydrant must be installed on the north side of SW Walnut Street and the east side of the west access drive to accommodate the fire department connection. With the installation of this fire hydrant, the required number of fire hydrants will be satisfied. The applicant shall meet these conditions as outlined in the November 2p�n memo and revise the construction plans accordingly. Public Water Svstem: The City of Tigard provides service in this area. There is an existing public water main located in SW Walnut Street. The applicanYs plans show two water line taps. These water lines do not require easements within the public ROW. The applicant's plans shall be revised to accommodate the comments received from NF8�R regarding fire hydrants. Storm Water Qualitv: The City has agreed to enforce Surface Water Management (SWM) regulations established by Clean Water Services (CWS) Design and Construction Standards (adopted by Resolution and Order No. 00-7) which require the construction of on-site water quality facilities. The facilities ENGINEERING COMMENTS CUP2007-00003 NF&R Walnut Station PAGE 8 shall be designed to remove 65 percent of the phosphorus contained in 100 percent of the storm water runoff generated from newly created impervious surfaces. In addition, a maintenance plan shall be submitted indicating the frequency and method to be used in keeping the facility maintained through the year. Prior to construction, the applicant shall submit plans and calculations for a water quality facility that will meet the intent of the CWS Design Standards. In addition, the applicant shall submit a maintenance plan for the facility that must be reviewed and approved by the City prior to construction. To ensure compliance with Clean Water Services design and construction standards, the applicant shall employ the design engineer responsible for the design and specifications of the private water quality facility to perform construction and visual observation of the water quality facility for compliance with the design and specifications. These inspections shall be made at significant stages throughout the project and at completion of the construction. Prior to final building inspection, the design engineer shall provide the City of Tigard (Inspection Supervisor) with written confirmation that the water quality facility is in compliance with the design and specifications. Gradinq and Erosion Control: CWS Design and Construction Standards also regulate erosion control to reduce the amount of sediment and other pollutants reaching the public storm and surface water system resulting from development, construction, grading, excavating, clearing, and any other activity which accelerates erosion. Per CWS regulations, the applicant is required to submit an erosion control plan for City review and approval prior to issuance of City permits. The Federal Clean Water Act requires that a National Pollutant Discharge Elimination System (NPDES) erosion control permit be issued for any development that will disturb one or more acre of land. Since this site is over one acre, the developer will be required to obtain an NPDES permit from the City prior to construction. This permit will be issued along with the site and/or building permit. Address Assiqnments: The City of Tigard is responsible for assigning addresses for parcels within the City of Tigard and within the Urban Service Boundary (USB). An addressing fee in the amount of$ 50.00 per address shall be assessed. This fee shall be paid to the City prior to issuance of the Site Permit. ENGINEERING COMMENTS CUP2007-00003 TVF&R Walnut Station PAGE 9 For multi-tenant buildings, one address number is assigned to the building and then all tenant spaces are given suite numbers. The City is responsible for assigning the main address and suite numbers. This information is needed so that building permits for tenant improvements can be adequately tracked in the City's permit tracking system. Based upon the information provided by the applicant, this building will be a multi-tenant building. Prior to issuance of the site permit, the applicant shall provide a suite layout map so suite numbers can be assigned. The addressing fee will then be calculated based upon the number of suites that must be addressed. In multi-level structures, ground level suites shall have numbers preceded by a "1", second level suites shall have numbers preceded by a "2", etc. Recommendations: THE FOLLOWING CONDITIONS SHALL BE SATISFIED PRIOR TO ISSUANCE OF THE SITE PERMIT: Submit to the Engineering Department (Kim McMillan, 639-4171, ext. 2642) for review and approval: . Prior to issuance of a site permit, a Public Facility Improvement (PFI) permit is required for this project to cover water quality/detention facilities, sewer and water connections and any other work in the public right-of-way. Six (6) sets of detailed public improvement plans shall be submitted for review to the Engineering Department. NOTE: these plans are in addition to any drawings required by the Building Division and should only include sheets relevant to public improvements. Public Facility Improvement (PFI) permit plans shall conform to City of Tigard Public Improvement Design Standards, which are available at City Hall and the City's web page (www.tiqard-or.gov). . The PFI permit plan submittal shall include the exact legal name, address and telephone number of the individual or corporate entity who will be designated as the "Permittee", and who will provide the financial assurance for the public improvements. For example, specify if the entity is a corporation, limited partnership, LLC, etc. Also specify the state within which the entity is incorporated and provide the name of the corporate contact person. Failure to provide accurate information to the Engineering Department will delay processing of project documents. . The applicant shall provide a construction vehicle access and parking plan for approval by the City Engineer. The purpose of this plan is for parking and traffic control during the public improvement construction phase. ENGINEERING COMMENTS CUP2007-00003 TVF8�R Walnut Station PAGE 10 . Prior to issuance of the Site Permit, the applicant shall pay the addressing fee. (STAFF CONTACT: Bethany Stewart, Engineering). . Prior to issuance of the PFI Permit the applicant shall submit plans for the emergency vehicle traffic signal for review and approval. . The applicant shall revise the plans to move the westerly driveway 10 feet to the west to align with the driveway across Walnut Street. . The applicant shall work with the adjacent property owner to remove a portion of the existing fence to obtain a minimum 400 feet of sight distance from the westerly driveway. . The applicant shall obtain approval from the NF&R Deputy Fire Marshall II for the proposed number and placement of hydrants prior to issuance of the City's Public Facility Improvement permit. . Final design plans and calculations for the proposed private water quality and detention facility shall be submitted to the Engineering Department (Kim McMillan) as a part of the Public Facility Improvement (PFI) permit plans. Included with the plans shall be a proposed landscape plan and maintenance plan. . An erosion control plan shall be provided as part of the Public Facility Improvement (PFI) permit drawings. The plan shall conform to the "Erosion Prevention and Sediment Control Design and Planning Manual, February 2003 edition." . The applicant shall obtain a 1200-C General Permit issued by the City of Tigard pursuant to ORS 468.740 and the Federal Clean Water Act. THE FOLLOWING CONDITIONS SHALL BE SATISFIED PRIOR TO A FINAL BUILDING INSPECTION: Submit to the Engineering Department (Kim McMillan, 639-4171, ext. 2642) for review and approval: . Prior to a final building inspection, the applicant shall complete the required public improvements, obtain conditional acceptance from the City, and provide a one-year maintenance assurance for said improvements. Additional right-of-way shall be dedicated to the Public along the frontage of SW Walnut Street to increase the right-of-way to 35 feet from the centerline for the full length of the frontage (including the east and west ends). The description shall be tied to the existing right-of-way centerline. The ENGINEERING COMMENTS CUP2007-00003 NF&R Walnut Station PAGE 11 dedication document shall be on City forms. Instructions are available from the Engineering Department. . Prior to final building inspection, the applicant shall restore the striping of the bike lane along the frontage of SW Walnut Street. . Prior to final building inspection, the applicant's engineer shall provide final sight distance certification for the westerly driveway. . Prior to final building inspection, the emergency vehicle traffic signal shall be fully operational and accepted by the City Engineer. . The applicant shall place the existing overhead utility lines along SW Walnut Street underground as a part of this project, or, if approved by the City Engineer, they shall pay the fee in-lieu of undergrounding. The fee shall be calculated by the frontage of the site that is parallel to the utility lines and will be $ 35.00 per lineal foot. If the fee option is approved, the amount will be $ 16,275.00 and it shall be paid prior to final building inspection. . To ensure compliance with Clean Water Services design and construction standards, the applicant shall employ the design engineer responsible for the design and specifications of the private water quality facility to perform construction and visual observation of the water quality facility for compliance with the design and specifications. These inspections shall be made at significant stages, and at completion of the construction. Prior to final building inspection, the design engineer shall provide the City of Tigard Engineering staff with written confirmation that the water quality facility is in compliance with the design and specifications. ENGINEERING COMMENTS CUP2007-00003 NF&R Walnut Station PAGE 12 MAILING / NOTIFICATION RECORDS AFFIDAVIT OF POSTING NOTICE OF A LAND USE PROPOSAL IMPORTANT NOTICE: „ THIS AFFIDAVIT MUST BE ACCOMPANIED BY A COPY � OF THE NOTICE THAT WAS POSTED ON THE SITE. . . , In the 1�latter of the I'roposed Land L se��pplications for: Land Use File Nos.: CUP2007-00003/SLR2007-00004/VAR2007-0003G Land Use File Name: TUALATIN VALLEY FIRE & RESCUE WALNLTT STATION I, Cher4�l Caines, Associate Planner for the Cit�� of 7'igard, do affirm that I posted notice of the land use proposal affecting the land located at (state the approximate location(s) IF no address(s) and/or tax lot(s) currently registered) 1�5 �.5 v�� '��`'�t S�-�" and did personall�� post notice of the Public Hearing on the proposed land use applicarion(s) bv means of weatherproof posting in the general�ncinity� of the affected territor�-, a copy of said notice being hereto attached and by reference made a part hereof, on the �`��` day of__ N uV e m bf'� ,20 D"7 . (�' ' Q- C C�-C,.'L1c.J Signatur of Person Who Perforrned Posting (In the presence of the Notan•) (THIS SECTION FOR A STATE OF OREGON,NOTARY PUBLIC TO COMPLETE/NOTARIZE) STATE OF �� ) County of c�I-�SN��cll'oTt=�� ) ss. Subscribed and sworn/affirmed before rne on the �Sr�day of �-�DV�K�2- ,20�`7. OFFICIpL SEAI SHIRLEY L�'q�T '-, ; NOTAR� `;Rt iC-ppEGON , L� ° COMMIS��(;r,NO.418777 �Ll��.c� � �l—L�-T MY COMMISSION EXPIRES APRII 2S,20�� NOTARY PUBLIC OF OREGON My Commission Expires: �r-(�s`/I I h:Alu�,hn\P�art��\mastcrs\�afh�acit��f P��sting f��r aPPlicant to p��st Public hcaring.doc I E F LI H ARI � N P B E '1'he f<>llc�win�^will be consiciered b�� the Ti ard Hearin s Offieer <>n Monda Deeember 17 2007 at 7:00 PM at the :I'igard Ci`�ic`Z�;enter - Town Hall, 1312 , a �T ., i�;ar , Ore�;on. ot }�u ic c>ra an written testtmony is invited. The public hearin on this matter will be conducted in accordance with the Tigard Munici�al Code and the rules of �rocedure ado�te� by the Council and available at City Hall or the rules of procedure set forth in Chapter 18.390. estimony may be submitted in writin� prior to or at the public hearing or ver6ally at the �ublic hearin� only. Failure to raise an issue in person or by letter at some point �rior to the close of the hearing accom�anied by statements or evidence sufficient to afford the decision-maker an opportunity to respond to the issue preclucies appeal to the Land Use Board of A�peal based on that issue. Failure to s�ecify the criterion from the Cc>mmuniry Development Code � Com�rehensive l�lan at which a comment is directed precludes an a��eal based on that criterion. A.co�y of the a�plication and all documents and evidence submitted by or.on behalf of the ap�licant and the a �licable criteria are availa6le for inspection at no cost. A copy of the staff re�ort will be macie available for inspection a�no cost at least seven (7) da�rs prior to the hearing, and copies for all item� can also be �ro�rided at a reasonable cost. Further information ma � be obtained from the Plannin�; Divisipn staff contact: Che 1 Caines at 13125 SW Hall Bl��ci., Ti�ard, Ore�;on 9�223, b}� callin�; 503-639-4171, c�r by email tc> c e c t� ar -or. ov. CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT (CUP) 2007-00003/SENSITIVE LANDS REVIEW (SLR) 2007-00004/ ADJUSTMENT (VAR) 2007-0003G - TUALATIN VALLEY FIRE & RESCUE WALNUT STATI�N - REQUEST: The applicant is requesting Conditional Use approval to construct a ncw fire station with a community room. Sensitive lands review is required because Krueger Creek and associated wetlands a. located on the site. The request is to release treated stormwater into the vegetated corridor around the creek. The applicant has also requested an adjustment to reduce the access spacing standards along a collector from 200 feet to 25 feet. LOCATION: 12585 SW Walnut Street; WCTM 2S104r1D, Tax Lot 4500. ZONE: R-4.5: The R-4.5 zoning district is designed to accommodate detached single-family homes with or without accessory residential units at a minimum lot size of 7,500 square feet. Duplexes and attached single-family units are permitted conditionally. Some civic and institutional uses are also permitted conditionally. APPLICABLE REVIEW CRITERIA: Community Development Code Chapters 18.330, 18.360, 18.390, 18.510, 18.705, 18.725, 18.745, 18,765, 18.775, 18.780, 18.790, 18.795 and 18.810. — > � Q • ` ' � _ �} GEOGRAPHIC INfORMATION SYSTEM � ,� N AREA NOTIFIED � KAR N _ - T (SOO�� w � � Q o mw�ee»n Q ________________ � AVE m o � o FOR: Katie Prew � T 0��"""°°°°' � BROOK C Angelo Planning Group �'", ",°'°°°"° RE: 2S104AD, 4500 � � m 9nn �--I N m�oe�msoa ________________ auw � l�- iouuaee emmo _ �u�� ueeaiae N""�07 OE�OEBB roee � �� —S� mwua�oa meauaseo --- moaoauroa iwnesea � -- o�uouea'""�"� Property owner information `' ouuosia oauos�oo is valid for 3 months from M wuas:o mnoaeo � __ wuono the date printed on this map. YE10i��09180 � IWBSI� oreeeso .( � IMG001B 107BI0808 w\�� — iouoaa �P�\� wnnn anoeao o unawo weaosoa niweosin wueu� iwn�oos m�u�wrn uensoe ""'°"° ARIE CT a�eu�oe o�esasa t O mecaso � meenooxeoa wnemte ��o�o Mueae� m�eae�o auoaoe o T- � I I anee�ee lMB810B 01�011 C tsoacwro� moueos�ae mw�ee�cee -- 1_1 �ums� iaaom wiomo a� anc e _ _ iouiooi:a n o��c a � ---- — -- ------ — nu�e�uoe �aea Be -- __ �acon sas -- eo�c e mm�caweo mou�o�soa eoam a��couea mou000roa °u�a� �� ooco�eo � ouoa�ao ouo oa mou�aosa �M m ae� o C10°°me�ac rno — N m �ca en e71EB �oeeia e rnnemwao E H wo o - meuoe�set � m Bca al ��ee se 251 ecae 0 100 200 300 400 Feet m�ec a rn oen a mwe�eHn m o0 oc�o lslluuQlOS i"=299 feet lSIOW WlBO p�pCC07E0A ssiouoa��oe i� mw�o�se� meuawioa _ S -- -- - --- ALBERTA i Information on this map is for general locatioa only and should be verified with the Development Services Division. 13125 SW Hall Bivd Tigard,OR 97223 (503)639-4171 http:Uwvnv.ci.tigard.or.us Community Development Plot date:Oct 30,2007;C:\magic\MAGIC03.APR 2S104A D-00500 2 04AA-901 ABRAHAMSON BRUCE Q BEL D TERRACE LLC AND SHERRY L PO 89 12735 SW MARIE CT MHILL, R 97148 TIGARD, OR 97223 2S104AD-D3505 2 104AA-90191 AUGUST THOMAS A&SUSAN A BEL 0 TERRACE LLC 12810 SW WALNUT ST PO 89 TIGARD,OR 97223 HILL, 97148 2 104AD-03502 2S O4AA-90131 A ST T MAS A&SUSAN A BEL 00 RRACE LLC 1281 WALNUT ST PO BO 9 T ARD, 97223 Y ILL,O 97148 2S 1 D4AD-00900 104AA-9016 BARMETTLER KEVIN P/MARY C BE 0 TERRACE LLC 12790 SW MARIE CT PO 9 TIGARD, OR 97223 HILL,O 97148 2S104AA-90202 2S1036C-10200 BASTIN JOHN C BLUE HERON PARK HOMEOWNERS ASSOC PO BOX 231086 PO BOX 231263 TIGARD, OR 97281 PORTLAND,OR 97251 2S'103BB-00600 S103BC-10400 BECKER HOWARD H OLIVE AN BL HE PARK HOMEOWNERS ASSOC 12555 SW 124TH PO B 231263 TIGARD, OR 97223 P TLA R 97281 2S1036C-10100 2 036C-10300 BEER DONALD E 8�JANET L BLU ER PARK HOMEOWNERS ASSOC 12765 SW BLUE HERON PL PO B 1263 TIGARD, OR 97223 TLAND. R 97281 2 104AA-90000 2S104AD-00800 BE WO TERRACE CONDOMINIUMS BRAZER GREG R 8�ELIZABETH A OW S OF UNITS 12770 5W MARIE CT TIGARD,OR 97223 2S104AA-90151 2S104AD-01300 BELLWOOD TERRACE LLC BROWN DOUGLAS L PO BOX 189 STEPHANIE L YAMHILL,OR 97148 12725 SW WALNUT TIGARD,OR 97223 1D4AA-9017 251036C-08600 B WO TERRACE LLC BURTZOS SANDRA L PO B 89 12790 SW BLUE HERON PL Y HILL, 97148 TIGARD,OR 97223 2S1036C-09600 2S1038C-09300 BYLES NANCY FAMILY REVOC LIVING DAVIS ALISON K BY BYLES NANCY JO TRS 12880 SW BLUE HERON PL 12895 SW BLUE HERON PL TIGARD,OR 97223 TIGARD,OR 97223 zs�osec-oa000 zs�oses-oi�oo CAMERON DONNA IRENE DAVIS MELISSA D 12490 SW WALNUT ST 12465 SW 124TH AVE TIGARD,OR 97223 TIGARD,OR 97223 2 S 104A D-03900 2S 103 BB-01500 CARLTON MARK M&BRENDA G DONOVAN RUTH REVOCABLE 12600 SW WALNUT ST LIVING TRUST TIGARD,OR 97223 12480 SW BROOK CT TIGARD,OR 97223 2S1D4AD-03802 2S103BC-04300 CASA TERRA LLC DOWNS JAMES R PO BOX 1082 12380 SW WALNUT ST CLACKAMAS, OR 97015 TIGARD,OR 97223 2S 103 BC-04600 2S 1038 B-00800 CHONG KAREN L&JOHN DURHAM STEVEN W&SHELLEY L PO BOX 231053 12525 SW 124TH AVE PORTLAND,OR 97281 TIGARD,OR 97223 2S104AD-01800 251036C-05003 CONNOR CATHLEEN P EBNER DARIUS 12655 SW 128TH AVE 1260 12TH TIGARD,OR 97223 WES'f LINN,OR 97068 2S104AA-00300 2S104AD-01000 CROMWELL SAMUEL T ENDICOTT JOHN A MARGARET A 12730 SW 128TH AVE 12665 SW 127TH TIGARD,OR 97223 TIGARD, OR 97223 2S 104AD-01400 251036B-06100 CRONHOLM SCOTT M ENGLISH JAMES& 12705 SW WALNUT HAYES JEANETTE TIGARD, OR 97223 12600 SW 124TH TIGARD,OR 97223 2 104AD-03504 2S103BC-04800 CUL ELL L IE D AND FORD WILLIAM H&SHEILA C DIANN 12675 SW 124TH 128 SW NUT TIGARD,OR 97224 T ARD, OR 97223 2S104AD-03503 2S103BC-04700 CULWELL LESLIE D/DIANNA L FRANCO HECTOR S 12800 SW WALNUT ST 12705 SW 124TH AVE TIGARD,OR 97223 TIGARD,OR 97223 2S103BB-00400 2S104AD-03501 FRANZEN NORMAN R JAM CHRISTOPHER M& JANET E GRAHAM LAURA J 12605 SW 124TH 12820 SW WALNUT ST TIGARD,OR 97223 TIGARD,OR 97223 2S103BC-05004 2S103BC-09800 FURST EDGAR&ANNA TRUSTEES JELINEK GARY L 13850 SW BONNIE BRAE CT 12805 SW BLUE HERON PL BEAVERTON,OR 97005 TIGARD,OR 97223 2S1036C-04400 2S104AD-04000 HAMES BEVERLY J JONES DAVID R&AMY L PO BOX 23115 12570 SW WALNUT ST TIGARD, OR 97281 TIGARD,OR 97223 2S 104A D-02700 2S 104AD-00300 HANSEN ERIC JONES JAIMI SARA 12915 SW WALNUT ST 12775 SW MARIE CT TIGARD, OR 97223 TIGARD,OR 97223 2S1036C-08700 2S1036C-09400 HANSEN ROBERT M&KATHLEEN M JUMONVILLE COLLEEN E 12800 SW BLUE HERON PL 12890 SW BLUE HERON PL TIGARD, OR 97223 TIGARD,OR 97223 2S103BB-05700 2S1036B-00500 HARTFIELD LEE E AND APRIL L KELLY PATRICIA M&MARLEEN MARY 12500 SW 124TH 12565 SW 124TH TIGARD, OR 97223 TIGARD,OR 97223 2S1036C-08500 2S104AD-01100 HAWES DIANE S KERR LORI L 12780 SW BLUE HERON PL 12760 SW 128TH AVE TIGARD,OR 97223 TIGARD,OR 97223 2S103BC-09500 2S103BC-03800 HILL LAWRENCE& KESSLER MARGUERITE E STORY DE ANN M 12425 5W ALBERTA 12900 SW BLUE HERON PL TIGARD,OR 97223 TIGARD,OR 97223 2S103B6-00900 2S104AD-01600 HOLCOMB FREDERICK P KLEFFNER THOMAS ANTHONY 12515 SW 124TH AVE PERRI FRANCIS TIMOTHY TIGARD,OR 97223 4975 SW 65TH AVE PORTLAND,OR 97221 2S104AD-04400 251036B-01000 ISAACSON GARLA KLEVE RUSSELL C 12520 SW WALNUT ST 12475 SW 124TH AVE TIGARD, OR 97223 TIGARD,OR 97223 2S103BC-09000 2S703B8-O5600 KOOS RONALD L MINER MARGARET K 12850 SW BLUE HERON CT 12470 SW 124TH AVENUE TIGARD,OR 97223 TIGARD,OR 97223 2S�04AD-034D1 2S104AD-01900 LEWIS FAMILY REV TRUST MONTOYA ALICIA BOTTELO& BY LEWIS BRIAN CLARKE/CHRISTINE CA NIEVES FIEDL MONTOYA 12828 SW WALNUT ST 12625 SW 128TH AVE TIGARD,OR 97223 TIGARD,OR 97223 2S 104A D-02000 2S 104AD-04900 LU RANDY S/LORNA K MOORE CAROLYN REV LIV TRUST 12605 SW 128TH BY CAROLYN MOORE/TERRY HAUCK TR5 TIGARD,OR 97223 1211 SW 5TH AVE#1700 PORTLAND,OR 97204 2S103BB-06000 2S104AD-00701 MAAG WAYNE H MURPHY DENNIS D AND ALTA L MARY A 12580 SW 124TH 12750 SW MARIE CT TIGARD,OR 97223 TIGARD,OR 97223 2S1038C-05002 2S1036C-04100 MAHONEY ELAINE MURPHY SHARON V Go EBNER DARIUS WOLFGANG 12470 SW WALNUT 1260 12TH ST TIGARD,OR 97223 WEST LINN,OR 97068 2S103BB-05900 2S104AD-03700 MANAHAN WILLIAM D 8�CHARLENE A NESS STEPHEN&JONA 12550 SW 124TH AVE 12730 SW WALNUT ST TIGARD,OR 97223 TIGARD,OR 97223 2S104AD-03500 2S104A�-042D0 MCLEOD JOYCE& OLSON DENNIS D SAFFORD AUDREY G 12540 SW WALNUT AVE 229 E WARREN COMMON TIGARD,OR 97223 FREMONT, CA 94539 2S103BC-04500 2S104AD-�4100 MCLIT REAL ESTATE LLC OLSON DENNIS D& 12360 SW WALNUT ST BONNIE LOUISE TIGARD,OR 97223 12540 SW WALNUT ST TIGARD,OR 97223 2S103BC-09100 2S104AD-03800 MEIKLE FREDERICK C III OL50N KATHLEEN A 8�NORRIS A 12860 SW BLUE HERON PL 13660 SW ASH AVE TIGARD,OR 97223 TIGARD,OR 97223 2S104AA-04900 2S104AD-01700 MENDEZ MARCOS ORNELAS JEREMY&JENNIFER 1260Q SW 127TH AVE 12705 SW 128TH AVE TIGARD,OR 97223 TIGARD,OR 97223 2S1036C-08800 2S104AD-00100 PENNER JOHN M&LILLIAN A SMITH JAMES W/MAXINE 12830 SW BLUE HERON PL 12600 SW 128TH TIGARD,OR 97223 TIGARD,OR 97223 2S 104A D-02601 2S 103 BC-09700 PETTERSON THOMAS W/PAULINE M FA SMITH MARGARET M THOMAS WlPAULINE M PETTERSEN TRS 12885 SW BLUE HERON PL 12921 SW WALNUT ST TIGARD,OR 97223 TIGARD, OR 97223 2S1036C-10000 251036C-09200 PLINSKI CHRISTIE M STEVENSON JODY H 12775 SW BLUE HERON PL 12870 5W BLUE HERON PL TIGARD, OR 97223 TIGARD,OR 97223 2S104AD-00600 2S104AD-01200 QUEAHPAMA RALPH G&MICHELLE K TAYLOR JAMES D c/o LEE KENNETH&DEANNA 12745 SW WALNUT ST 12730 SW MARIE CT TIGARD,OR 97223 TIGARD,OR 97223 2S104AD-01500 2S104AA-00400 RASMUSSEN VENETA M& THIES JOHN A JR&JULIA M PAUL VICTOR 12555 5W 127TH AVE 12755 SW 128TH TIGARD,OR 97223 TIGARD, OR 97223 2S103BC-04200 2 3BB-06300 RAU JULIE M TIGA D OF 12430 SW WALNUT ST 1312 HALL BLVD TIGARD,OR 97223 T ARD, 97223 2S104AD-00200 2S1 AD-04501 ROHR RICHARD A TIGA OF 1107 SITKA AVE 1312 ALL BLVD NEWBERG,OR 97132 T ARD,O 7223 2S104AA-04800 2S104AA-0460 RUSSELL DAVID E II&DENISE M TIG D Y OF 12500 SW 127TH AVE 1312 HALL BLVD TIGARD, OR 97223 TI ARD,O 97223 2 S 104A D-04300 2S 104AD-00400 SEVERSON EVERETT O TORRES ROSENDO HERNANDEZ& Go DENNIS OLSON BOTELLO MARIA ODILIA 12540 SW WALNUT 12755 SW MARIE CT TIGARD,OR 97223 TIGARD,OR 97223 2S1038C-04900 2S104AD-04500 SHULTS BRUCE L TUALATIN VALLEY FIRE&RESCUE 12625 SW 124TH 2O665 SW BLANTON ST TIGARD,OR 97223 ALOHA,OR 97007 2S103BC-08900 2S103BB-03301 VANBEBBER SUZANNE YANDLE FAMILY REVOCABLE TRUST 12840 SW BLUE HERON PL BY JOHN C/HEATHER A YANDLE TRS TIGARD,OR 97223 2804 MISSION COLLEGE BLVD SANTA CLARA,CA 95054 2S104AA-90181 251038B-00700 WAKEFIELD ANDREW B YINGER FAMILY REVOC TRUST 12658 SW KAREN ST#18 BY KENT L/DEBORAH L YINGER TRS TIGARD,OR 97223 12545 SW 124TH AVE PORTLAND,OR 97223 2S104AA-04700 251038C-09900 WATSON MITCHELL F/MARY P ZAKRZEWSKI CHAPIN ORR 29650 NW OLSON RD 12785 SW BLUE HERON PL GASTON,OR 97119 TIGARD,OR 97223 2S103BC-05001 WING LOUIE FAMILY LIMITED PARTNE PO BOX 86404 PORTLAND, OR 97206 zsiasss-osaoo WINKLER L DUANE/MARIE B 12520 SW 124TH AVE TIGARD, OR 97223 2S104AA-05200 WINSTON MARK 8 WINSTON ZSUZSANNA 14925 SW 100TH AVE TIGARD, OR 97224 2St04AA-05100 WI ON RK&ZSUZSANNA 14925 TH AVE TI RD,OR 97224 2 104AA-050 WI MARK&ZSUZSANNA 149 S OOTH AVE T ARD, OR 97224 2S104AD-02600 WIRTHLIN JOSEPH E 12919 SW WALNUT TIGARD, OR 97223 2S1036C-08400 WOOD JOANNE 12770 SW BLUE HERON PL TIGARD,OR 97223 Brooks Gaston 3206 Princess Edinburg, TX 78539 Don & Dorothy Erdt 13760 SW 121 st Avenue Tigard, OR 97223 Ellen Beilstein 14630 SW 139'h Avenue Tigard, OR 97224 Martha Bishop 10590 SW Cook Lane Tigard, OR 97223 Vanessa Foster 13085 SW Howard Drive Tigard, OR 97223 Susan Beilke 11755 SW 114th Place Tigard, OR 97223 CPO 4B 16200 SW Pacific Highway, Suite H242 Tigard, OR 97224 Patricia Keerins 12195 SW 121 st Avenue Tigard, OR 97223 John Frewing 7110 SW Lola Lane Tigard, OR 97223 Gretchen Buehner 13249 SW 136th Place Tigard, OR 97224 /'ITV AC TIl.AR�I _ fF�ITRhI IAITGRGtT[Il DARTI[( /�•�..��r.,i.,��r��.,u-,h.,i��iT r�,,.,+r�i �+�� i ionnTGn• ��_nn-,,, n� 10/27/2007 12:54 5032273679 AEA PAGE 02/02 C ITY t7 F '�'I GARD COMM�UNiTY DrV�,LOPMr�,T�� nr.PAR��rr.�T ,� PI,ANNJNG DIVISION w 13127 SW H.lLLT� .liOUJ�r.VARD � TIC7ARi�, ORr.GON 97223 !�I iC7NF: 503-C39_4171 1=�1t: 5Q3-G2�F-3G81 (�1Stn� l�sltv/1'I�ni�in� 1:?;vIA17..: :�L}��a��:L>:�r�l-ot.}ro�� • ' iP z��Qu�sr ro�. 500-�oax ��o��TY owNE� .n�.�.��NC �.�s�r Pan13e��iZT o�vner inf�rm:�tion is c�alid for 3 montbs Er.o�r+ the date of your rcqucst TNT�TCI�'1"L'ALL I�RC�)]�CT 1VL/1 '� '�'A T.07'��RS (i.c. 15134�11i,Tax T.nt 00100) 4lt THF ,�DDRrssES F()7t 1�LL PROJFC'I'P1IRCELS BL,LOW: 12�45 SW Walnut:Strect '�Gj�47��C�-��0� �'i�;ard. C)lt 97223 1'��B��WA.�'�HAT ONLY 1 SET OF LABELS_W�L.�.��_PROVIDED AT THIS TIME FOR �O��Ta�NG YOUR NEIGHBO�itI�OOD MEE'I"�NG. tlf�cr subinitting yaur land usc applicatic�n tc� the �ity, a�lcl the �rojcct ��1;►nnc�: has rcviewed yout appJica.tion for cc»nplctencss, you will be notifi�d by mcaz�s of az� inccxn��lete:ness lettet to vbtain youx 2 �'u111 scts of labcls. IF_YOU��EEN NOTIFIED BY PLANNING T�( ��,iN Y�i7R��Et.S,,PLEASE INDICATE BELOW THAT YOU NEED 2 SETS OF L_Q��S. � Com]�letencss Lcttcr Rcceived Ix�dicating 2 Sets o£E�ve�op�cs w/Address Labels Reqaixed T��c 2 fn�J scts of J�bels ��eed to be��lacecl on cnvclopes (xxo scl£�dhesive cn,velopcs p�ease) with fu�st class lctter- rare J�c,�t:��e orz tlze ex�velapes in r.hc fo��m of postage sl-�inps (�no mctcrcd enveXopcs and ��o r,�turn �ddr,�ss) ax�d resub�r,ir.r.cd re> rl,e Ciry fc�r r.hc�iuz7�ose of pa:oviclxxx�:ttoticc to rr'c�perly ownc��s of r.hc ��pc�scd land usc aJ�J�licatton and thc dccisi�n. The 2 sets of cnvelopes tn s�be�fr4pt sep;�rlcc. Tl1e pe:�son listcd bcl�w will bc called to picic up �+�c� pay for tl�tc labcl.s�uhcn thcy a�:c+�eady. N�IMI_�.c�r CC.)NT11CT PT�.RSC)N:1{atic Prew PF-1C)NT.: (503)_229�-az25 N�1ATP, ()1�' COMPI�.NY:11�xgP)o Plailnin�Urou� 1=��: �503)-227-3G79 LI�1.l1IL: lct,pxcw(cr7,an,�clo�lannin�;.cc�m 'T'1�i5 rec�tiest rn�� be einailed, zna.iled, faxcd, or hand dclivcrcd co the Ciry of Tzg,�,�d. Plc�se allow a 2-d�y txaini�n.u�x� fo±: procccsin� rcquests. Lipon compleric�n c>f��c�u.r iequesl, thc co+it�.ct ��e�-san ]isted wi�l bc c�ll.ed to piclt up tl�c�t re�ucct thflt�vill bc placed ul "V{lill Call" �� r.he cc�in�,any nunc {ox by tlie coxltact person's last n�unc iF z�o co�npany) at ti,e Pla�u�i�/]�ii�incerin�Cau»Ter ar tl�c Pea-m.ir.(:cnter. '1'he. cost of rr�eessing p��ur reqtiest must be pa.id at tlae titne of�icle ur, a5 ex.lct cost c:�n ttot bc�+r.c-detextxiinecl, 1'�.�'�,SF NOTE,• JFO.� X�'ASONS OF 1lCCURACY, O.NI.Y �I�IGINAL MAILING LABELS PRDVIDED 13Y TI��'CX�TY YS. RE-TYPED MAILING I�4BELS WILL BL'ACC�.PT�'D. 'osc T�escy�, $1'J to genernre the m�ilin�lict;,rlus $2 per shcct foi printin�;the lisc��nCO labels (2�addr.esseF per shcet). Then,mttlti�ly thc cost to prin l onc�ct of]abel� by t]�e number r�f sets requesCed. - ��M�� - - COST FOR THI.$ REQUES"Z' - ,�_tilzcctr+nf lahc•Iti x�2/vh��•t =�(_IQ x 2 vctv= .516.00 � hcc:t(��r IAlxls r$M/c�1t�•t=,$��Nctt:_ ;1 .v� ��I�ectti of l�lxls a S2/vhrcr fnr itircrcarcd p:�rttic�s x 1 secs= $ 4,pU �chect(s)<�f l�bdR x S2/qhcct f�r intcrc�fcil��rlrCies=�x � �� _. (i1ZNP.RA`r'1'�IS�1.;.,=,,,,..,,,�$�,1,OU Ci.�:.�'�Ll. � _ '1'()'I':\l. — �31.fN1 'I'()'I'r11, �� 10/27/20e7 12:54 5032273679 AEA PAGE 01/02 � plannin� �[QUq LANO USE PLANNINQ • TRANSPOf�TATION pLANNINd • PfiOJECT MANACiEMENT � Fax Date: October 29,2007 To: Patty Lunsford, Planning D'nrision Fronn: Katie i�rew Fax: (503)6243681 cc: Phone: (503}639-4171 Pages: 2(including cover sheet) Re: Meiling Label RequeSt A mailing labei request is being faxed abng with this cover sheet. Please feel free to contact me at (503) 224-8225 or kprew�an�eloplanninp.com if you need further information or if I can answer any questions. 1'hank you,� Katie Prew Q26 SW Mein$treet,5uite 201,P�rtlqnd,OR 97205•3026 • tel 503.2?.4.69%4 • fc�x 503.227,3679 • www.angeloplpnning.COm 2 S 104AD-04500 1 �j /� TUALATIN VALLEY FIRE 8 RESCUE l /lv (J� ��L�iYS 20665 SW BLANTON ST ALOHA,OR 97007 � �� , � . . �� AFFIDAVIT OF MAILING - I, Patricia L. Lunsford bein�first duly sworn/affir�n, on oath depose and say that I am a Planning Aciministrative Assistant for the City of zI'iga ,Washington County,Oregon and that I served the following: ;<}xx k'Yry`i�ry,iin��EM n(.)Ik�k,u�� ❑X NOTIC� OF PUBLIC HEARING FOR CiJP2007-00003/SLR2007-00004/VAR2007-00036/SGN2007-00171 - TUALATTN VALLEY FIRE &RESCiJE (File No./N�uir Refemnce) � AMENDEDNOTIC� HEARING BODY: HEARING DATE: ❑ City of Tigard Plaruung Director � TigardHearings Officer (12/17/2007) ❑ Tigard Plaiuung Coiru�tussion ❑ Tigard City Council A copy of the said notice being hereto attached,marked E}chibit"A",and by ref erence made a part hereof,was mailed to each named person(s) at the address(s) shown on the attached list(s),marked Exhibit"B",and by reference made a part hereof,on November 26,2007,and deposited in the United States Mail on November 26,2007,postage prepaid. �� 1 �-� (Pexson that Pre are uce) STATE OF OREGON County of Washington ss. City of Tigard -�— Subscribed and sworn/affirmed before me on the :�,� dayof ►��U��' ,2007. o�cuu s�x fHIRLEb L TREAT NOTARY PUBUC-OREQONI ,/,��fi COMMISSION NO.416777 �Y 11AY COMMISSION EXPIRES APRIL 2S,20» N TARY PUB C OF ORE GON My Coinnvssion Expires: `�'�d.S��l� � � EXH I NOTIC� TO MORTGAGEE,__�ENHOLDER,VENDOR OR S�.LER THE TIGARD DEVELOPMENTQODE REQUIRES TT�ATIFYOUREC�,IVE T�IIS NOTICE, �� IT SHAL.I_BE PROMI'"TI.Y FORWARDED TO THE PURC�-IASER PUBLIC HEARING NOTICE NO7'ICE IS HEREBY GIVEN THAT THE TIGARD HEARINGS OFFICER, AT A MEE7TNG ON MONDAY DECEMBER 17, 2007 AT 7:00 PM, IN T�-�, TOWN HALL OF Tf-�, 'ITGARD QVIC CENTER AT 13125 SW HALL BOULEVARD,TTGARD,OREGON 97223 WILL CONSIDER THE FOLLOWING APPLICATTON: FILE NOS.: CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT (CUP) 2007-00003 SENSITTVE LANDS VIEW SLR) 2007-00004 ADTUSTIVIENT VAR 2007-000 6 SIGN PERMIT G 2007-00171 FILE TITLE: TUALATIN VALLEY FIRE & RESCLJE WALNUT STATION APPLICANT/ Tualatin ValleyFire &Rescue APPLICANT'S Angelo Planning Group OWNER Attn: GaryWells REPRESENTATIVE: Attn: FrankAngelo 20665 SW Blanton St. 921 SW Washington St., Suite 468 Aloha,OR 97007 Portland, OR 97205 REQUEST: The applicant is requesting Conditional Use approval to construct a new fire station with a commuruty room. Sensiuve lands review is reqwred because Krueger Creek and associated wetlands are located on the site. The request is to release treated stormwater into the vegetated corridor around the creek The applicant has also requested an adjustment to reduce the access spacuig standards along a collector from 200 feet to 25 feet. LOCATION: 12585 SW Walnut Street;WCTM 2S104AD,Tax Lot 4500. ZONE: R 4.5: The R 4.5 zoning district is designed to accommodate detached sin le-family homes with or without accessory residential units at a ininunum lot size of 7,�00 square feet. Duplexes and attached s�ngle-fam;ly units are pernutted conditionally. Some civic and u�stitutional uses are also pernutted conditionally. APPLICABLE RE VIE W CRITERIA: Community Development Code Chapters 18.330, 18.360, 18.390, 18.510, 18.705, 18.725, 18.745, 18,765, 18.775, 18.780, 18.790, 18.795 and 18.810. THE PUBLIC HEARING ON T�IIS MATTER WILL BE CONDUCTED IN ACCORDANC� WITH 'THE RULES OF CHAl'TER 18.390 OF T�-�E COMMUIVITY DEVELOPMENT CODE AND RULES OF PROCEDURES ADOPTED BY THE TTGARD QTY COUNQL AND AVAILABLE AT QTY HALL. ASSISTIVE LISTENING DEVIC�S ARE AVAILABLE FOR PERSONS WITH IMI'AIRED HEARING. Tf-IE QT'Y WILL ALSO ENDEAVOR TO ARRANGE FOR QUALIFIED SIGN LANGUAGE INTERPRETERS AND QUALIFIED BILINGUAL INTERPRETERS UPON REQUEST. PLEASE CALL (503) 639-4171, EXT. 2438 (VOICE) OR (503) 684-2772 (TDD- TELECOMMUIVICAT'IONS DEVICES FOR Tf-�E DEAF)NO LESS THAN ONE WEEK PRIOR TO'IT�E HEARING TO MAKE ARRANGEMENTS. ANYONE WISHING TO PRESENT WRITTEN TEST'IMONY ON Tf IIS PROPOSED ACI'ION MAY DO SO IN WRITING PRIOR TO OR AT THE PUBLIC HEARING. ORAL TESTTMONY MAY BE PRESENTED AT THE PUBL.IC HEARING. AT THE PUBLIC HEARING, TF-�, HEARINGS OFFI�R WILL REC�IVE A STAFF REPORT PRESENTA7TON FROM THE QTY PLANNER,OPEN THE PUBLIC HEARING,AND INVITE BOTH ORAL AND WRITTEN TES7'IMONY. THE HEARINGS OFFIC�R MAY CON'TTNUE THE PUBLIC HEARING TO ANO'I'I�R MEETTNG TO OBTAIN ADDI7TONAL INFORMATTON OR Q.OSE 'IT� PUBLIC HEARING AND TAKE ACITON ON THE APPLICATTON. IF A PERSON SUBMITS EVIDENC�', IN SUPPORT TO THE APPLICATTON LESS THAN SEVEN (7) DAYS PRIOR TO 'I'HE PUBLIC HEARING,ANY PARTY IS EN'ITTLED TO REQLIEST A CONTINUANCE OF THE HEARING. IF T�-�RE IS NO CON I'INUANC� GRANT'ED AT THE HEARING,ANY PARTIC:IPANT IN 7'F-IE HEARING MAY REQUEST THAT 'THE RECORD REMAIN OPEN FOR AT LEAST SEVEN (7) DAYS AFTER THE HEARING. A REQUEST THAT THE RECORD REMAIN OPEN CAN BE MADE ONLY AT Tf-�E FIRST EVIDENTTARY HEARING(ORS 197J63(6). INQ,UDED IN T�IIS NOTTC� IS A LIST OF APPROVAL CRITERIA APPLICABLE TO T'HE REQUEST FROM THE TTCGARL) COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT CODE AND T�-�E TTGARD CONII'REHENSIVE PLAN. APPROVAL OR DISAPPROVAL OF THE REQUEST BY THE HEARINGS OFFIC�R WILL BE BASED UPON THESE QZITERIA AND T'HESE CRITERIA ONLY. AT'THE HEARING IT IS IMI'ORTANT THAT CONIlv1ENTS RELATTNG TO THE REQUEST PERTAIN SPEQFICALLY TO THE APPLICABLE CRITERIA LISTED. FAILURE TO RAISE AN ISSLJE IN PERSON OR BY LETTER AT SOME POINT PRIOR TO 7'HE Q.OSE OF THE HEARING ON THE REQUEST ACGOMI'AI�iIED BY STATEMENTS OR EVIDENC� SUFFIQENT TO ALLOW THE HEARINGS AUTHORI'I'Y AN OPPORTUIVI'TY TO RESPOND TO THE ISSUE PRECLUDES AN APPEAL TO THE LAND LI�E BOARD OF APPEALS BASED ON THAT ISSLIE. ALL DOCLJMENTS AND APPLICABLE CRITERIA IN T'HE ABOVE-NOTED FILE ARE AVAILABLE FOR INSPECITON AT NO COST OR COPIES CAN BE OBTAINED FOR TWENTY-FIVE C�NTS (25�) PER PAGE, OR T'HE CURRENT RATE Q�ARGED FOR COPIES AT T'HE TTME OF T'HE REQUEST. AT LEAST SEVEN (7) DAYS PRIOR TO THE HEARING,A GOPY OF THE STAFF REPORT WILL BE AVAILABLE FOR INSPECI'ION AT NO OOST,OR A QOPY CAN BE OBTAINED FOR TWENT'Y-FIVE CENT'S (25C) PER PAGE, OR THE CLJRRENT RATE Q�ARGED FOR COPIES AT 'IT�E TTME OF T'�IE REQUEST. FOR FURTHER INFORMA7TON PLEASE CONTACT THE STAFF PLANNER CHERYL CAINES AT 503.639.4171, 7TGARD QTY HALL, 13125 SW HALL BOULEVARD, TIGARD, OREGON 97223, OR BY E-MAIL TO c he ry1cCa?tigard-or.gov. _ - `� Q � � . . .. .,. . .... 3 � �'� VI�;INI"1'1 111AP � a �� ----------- � �_I_1p]�n�—_i n i�n r.i N _____________ KAHEN � Tl�_�1L_�TIN�'_�LLEI" FIRE�FtE;�_1.�E w \\_�1LN I.T:T.iTI i:�N a � � a qV E � r Ot,, BROO�c� `v0� � � N S < ✓//D�� :;ITHECT �N� 1. �� NP Q � 0 rtie cr ' � � �:, . l. �, , // " TIPPI F � .. � ' � � 1..�— a • N 2 J .x � � � ALB A ...... ,....o�.. n.�� Wmmun�ry0evelopn9n[ Ol40te NOV 13.� .••Imaqi[Vv1A A R `. . EXH l B IT�� Tualatin Valley Fire &Rescue Attn: Gary Wells CLJP2007-00003/SLR2007-00004/VAR2007-00036 20665 SW Blanton Street TVF&R FIRE WALNUT STATION Aloha, OR 97007 Angelo Planning Group Attn: Frank Angelo 921 SW Washington St.,Suite 468 Portland, OR 97205 markCa�,�adgett.net Mark Padgett Patty Lunsford From: Mark Padgett [mark@padgett.net] Sent: Monday, November 26, 2007 5:02 PM To: Patty Lunsford Subject: RE: Tualatin Valley Fire & Rescue (TVF&R)Public Hearing Notice Attachments: image001.jpg Thank you, Patty. I will let the other members of my homeowners association Board know also. I really appreciate your help. My tax dollars at work. :-) Mark Padgett voice 503.590.5226 cell 503.997.MARK email mark(a�padqett.net -----Original Message----- From: Patty Lunsford [mailto:PATTY@tigard-or.gov] Sent: Monday, November 26, 2007 4:28 PM To: 'mark@padgett.net' Cc: Patly Lunsford Subject: Tualatin Valley Fire & Rescue (NF&R) Public Hearing Notice Hi Mark, TVF&R's land use application is complete and is scheduled for a public hearing before the Hearings Officer on Monday December 17,2007 at 7:00 PM. The notice of the hearing is attached for your review as requested If you have any questions,please call me. Best regards, Patty Patty Lunsford „ Cii`r ofT�pdt'd - Plannina HdminisUsU:�e.�s=ist�nt ;5�]�'� �:3-�-��3 patt�,•cbec,rd-or.go•,: 1�125 5'�';Hall BI••,d. Tiadrd, Oreoon ?:'223 1 2 S 104AD-00500 2 104AA-901 ABRAHAMSON BRUCE Q BEL D TERRACE LLC AND SHERRY L PO 189 12735 SW MARIE CT MHILL, R 97148 TIGARD, OR 97223 2S104AD-03505 2 104AA-90191 AUGUST THOMAS A&SUSAN A BEL O TERRACE LLC 12810 SW WALNUT ST PO 89 TIGARD, OR 97223 , HILL, 97148 2 104AD-03502 2S O4AA-90131 A ST T MAS A&SUSAN A BEL 00 RRACE LLC 1281 WALNUT ST PO BO 9 T ARD, 97223 Y ILL, 0 97148 2S104AD-00900 104AA-9016 BARMETTLER KEVIN P/MARY C BE 0 TERRACE LLC 12790 SW MARIE CT PO 9 TIGARD, OR 97223 HILL,O 97148 2S104AA-90202 2S103BC-10200 BASTIN JOHN C BLUE HERON PARK HOMEOWNERS ASSOC PO BOX 231086 PO BOX 231263 TIGARD, OR 97281 PORTLAND,OR 97281 251036B-00600 S1036C-10400 BECKER HOWARD H OLIVE AN BL HE PARK HOMEOWNERS ASSOC 12555 SW 124TH PO B 231263 TIGARD,OR 97223 P TLA OR 97281 2S103BC-10100 2 038C-10300 BEER DONALD E&JANET L BLU E PARK HOMEOWNERS ASSOC 12765 SW BLUE HERON PL PO B 1263 TIGARD, OR 97223 TLAND, R 97281 2 104AA-90000 2S104AD-008D0 BE WO TERRACE CONDOMINIUMS BRAZER GREG R 8 ELIZABETH A OW S OF UNITS 12770 SW MARIE CT TIGARD,OR 97223 2S104AA-90151 2S104AD-01300 BELLWOOD TERRACE LLC BROWN DOUGLAS L PO BOX 189 STEPHANIE L YAMHILL,OR 97148 12725 SW WALNUT TIGARD,OR 97223 104AA-9017 2 S 103 B C-08600 B WO TERRACE LLC BURTZOS SANDRA L PO B 89 12790 SW BLUE HERON PL Y HILL, 97148 TIGARD,OR 97223 �2S1038C-09600 2S1038C•09300 BYLES NANCY FAMILY REVOC LIVING OAVIS ALISON K BY BYLES NANCY JO TRS 12880 SW BLUE HERON PL 12895 SW BLUE HERON PL TIGARD,OR 97223 TIGARD, OR 97223 2S1036C-04000 2S1038B-01100 CAMERON DONNA IRENE DAVIS MELISSA D 12490 SW WALNUT ST 12465 SW 124TH AVE TIGARD, OR 97223 TIGARD,OR 97223 2S104AD-03900 2S10366-01500 CARLTON MARK M&BRENDA G DONOVAN RUTH REVOCABLE 12600 SW WALNUT ST LIVING TRUST TIGARD, OR 97223 12480 SW BROOK CT TIGARD,OR 97223 2S�04AD-03802 2S103BC-04300 CASA TERRA LLC DOWNS JAMES R PO BOX 1082 12380 SW WALNUT ST CLACKAMAS, OR 97015 TIGARD,OR 97223 2S1038C-04600 2S10368•00800 CHONG KAREN L 8 JOHN DURHAM STEVEN W&SHELLEY L PO BOX 231053 12525 SW 124TH AVE PORTLAND, OR 97281 TIGARD,OR 97223 2S104AD-01800 2S1036C-05003 CONNOR CATHLEEN P EBNER DARIUS 12655 SW 128TH AVE 1260 12TH TIGARD, OR 97223 WES'f LINN, OR 97068 2S104AA-00300 2S104AD-01000 CROMWELL SAMUEL T ENDICOTT JOHN A MARGARET A 12730 SW 128TH AVE 12665 SW 127TH TIGARD,OR 97223 TIGARD, OR 97223 2S104AD-01400 251038B-06100 CRONHOLM SCOTT M ENGLISH JAMES 8 12705 SW WALNUT HAYES JEANETTE TIGARD, OR 97223 12600 SW 124TH TIGARD,OR 97223 2S 104AD-03504 2St 03BC-04B00 CUL ELL L IE D AND FORD WILLIAM H&SHEILA C DIANN 12675 SW 124TH 128 SW NUT TIGARD,OR 97224 T ARD,OR 97223 2S104AD-03503 2S1036C-04700 CULWELL LESLIE D/DIANNA L FRANCO HECTOR S 12800 SW WALNUT ST 12705 SW 124TH AVE TIGARD, OR 97223 TIGARD,OR 97223 .2S10388-00400 2S104AD-03501 FRANZEN NORMAN R JAM CHRISTOPHER M& JANET E GRAHAM LAURA J 12605 SW 124TH 12820 SW WALNUT ST TIGARD,OR 97223 TIGARD,OR 97223 251036C-05004 2S1036C-09800 FURST EDGAR 8 ANNA TRUSTEES JELINEK GARY L 13850 SW BONNIE BRAE CT 12805 SW BLUE HERON PL BEAVERTON, OR 97005 TIGARD,OR 97223 251036C-04400 2S104AD-04000 HAMES BEVERLY J JONES DAVID R&AMY L PO BOX 23115 12570 SW WALNUT ST TIGARD,OR 97281 TIGARD,OR 97223 2S104AD-02700 2S104A0-00300 HANSEN ERIC JONES JAIMI SARA 12915 SW WALNUT ST 12775 SW MARIE CT TIGARD, OR 97223 TIGARD,OR 97223 2S103BC-08700 2S1038C-09400 HANSEN ROBERT M&KATHLEEN M JUMONVILLE COLLEEN E 12800 SW BLUE HERON PL 12890 SW BLUE HERON PL TIGARD, OR 97223 TIGARD,OR 97223 2S10386-05700 2S103BB-00500 HARTFIELD LEE E AND APRIL L KELLY PATRICIA M&MARLEEN MARY 12500 SW 124TH 12565 SW 124TH TIGARD,OR 97223 TIGARD,OR 97223 251038C-08500 2S104AD-01100 HAWES DIANE S KERR LORI L 12780 SW BLUE HERON PL 12760 SW 128TH AVE TIGARD,OR 97223 TIGARD,OR 97223 2S1038C-09500 2S1038C-03800 HILL LAWRENCE 8 KESSLER MARGUERITE E STORY DE ANN M 12425 SW ALBERTA 12900 SW BLUE HERON PL TIGARD,OR 97223 TIGARD,OR 97223 2S 7 03 B B-00900 2S 104AD-01600 HOLCOMB FREDERICK P KLEFFNER THOMAS ANTHONY 12515 5W 124TH AVE PERRI FRANCIS TIMOTHY TIGARD,OR 97223 4975 SW 65TH AVE PORTLAND,OR 97221 2 S 104AD-04400 2 S 1036B-01000 ISAACSON GARLA KLEVE RUSSELL C 12520 SW WALNUT ST 12475 SW 124TH AVE TIGARD, OR 97223 TIGARD,OR 97223 251036C-09000 2510388-05600 KOOS RONALD L MINER MARGARET K 12850 SW BLUE HERON CT 12470 SW 124TH AVENUE TIGARD,OR 97223 TIGARD,OR 97223 2S104AD-03401 2S104AD-01900 LEWIS FAMILY REV TRUST MONTOYA ALICIA BOTTELO 8 BY LEWIS BRIAN CLARKE/CHRISTINE CA NIEVES FIEDL MONTOYA 12828 SW WALNUT ST 12625 SW 128TH AVE TIGARD,OR 97223 TIGARD,OR 97223 2 S 104A D-02000 2 S 104AD-04900 LU RANDY S/LORNA K MOORE CAROLYN REV LIV TRUST 12605 SW 128TH BY CAROLYN MOORE/TERRY HAUCK TRS TIGARD, OR 97223 1211 5W 5TH AVE#1700 PORTLAND, OR 97204 2S10388-06000 2S104AD-00701 MAAG WAYNE H MURPHY DENNIS D AND ALTA L MARY A 12580 SW 124TH 12750 SW MARIE CT TIGARD, OR 97223 TIGARD,OR 97223 2S1036C-05002 2S103BC-04100 MAHONEY ELAINE MURPHY SHARON V c/o EBNER�ARIUS WOLFGANG 12470 SW WALNUT 1260 12TH ST TIGARD,OR 97223 WEST LINN, OR 97068 2 S 103 B B-05900 2S 104AD-03700 MANAHAN WILLIAM D&CHARLENE A NESS STEPHEN&JONA 12550 SW 124TH AVE 12730 SW WALNUT ST TIGARD, OR 97223 TIGARD,OR 97223 2 S 104A D-03500 2 S 104AD-04200 MCLEOD JOYCE& OLSON DENNIS D SAFFORD AUDREY G 12540 SW WALNUT AVE 229 E WARREN COMMON TIGARD,OR 97223 FREMONT, CA 94539 2siosac-oasoo zs�oaAO-oa,00 MCLIT REAL ESTATE LLC OLSON DENNIS D 8 12360 SW WALNUT ST BONNIE LOUISE TIGARD,OR 97223 12540 SW WALNUT ST TIGARD,OR 97223 2S1038C-09100 2S104AD-03800 MEIKLE FREDERICK C III OLSON KATHLEEN A 8 NORRIS A 12860 5W BLUE HERON PL 13660 SW ASH AVE TIGARD, OR 97223 TIGARD,OR 97223 2S104AA-04900 2S104AD-01700 MENOEZ MARCOS ORNELAS JEREMY 8 JENNIFER 1260a SW 127TH AVE 12705 SW 128TH AVE TIGARD, OR 97223 TIGARD,OR 97223 •2S103BC•08800 2S104AD-00100 PENNER JOHN M 8 LILLIAN A SMITH JAMES W/MAXINE 12830 SW BLUE HERON PL 12600 SW 128TH TIGARD, OR 97223 TIGARD,OR 97223 2S104AD-02601 2S103BC-09700 PETTERSON THOMAS W/PAULINE M FA SMITH MARGARET M THOMAS W/PAULINE M PETTERSEN TR5 12885 SW BLUE HERON PL 12921 SW WALNUT ST TIGARD,OR 97223 TIGARD, OR 97223 2S103BC-10000 2S103BC-09200 PLINSKI CHRISTIE M STEVENSON JODY H 12775 SW BLl1E HERON PL 12870 SW BLUE HERON P� TIGARD, OR 97223 TIGARD,OR 97223 2S104AD-00600 2S104AD-01200 QUEAHPAMA RALPH G 8 MICHELLE K TAYLOR JAMES D c/o LEE KENNETH&DEANNA 12745 SW WALNUT ST 12730 SW MARIE CT TIGARD,OR 97223 TIGARD, OR 97223 2S 104AD-01500 2S104AA-00400 RASMUSSEN VENETA M& THIES JOHN A JR&JULIA M PAUL VICTOR 12555 SW 127TH AVE 12755 SW 128TH TIGARD,OR 97223 TIGARD, OR 97223 2S103BC-04200 2 3B8-06300 RAU JULIE M TIGA D OF 12430 SW WALNUT ST 1312 HALL BLVD TIGARD, OR 97223 T ARD, 97223 2S104AD•00200 2S1 AD-04501 ROHR RICHARD A TIGA Y OF 1107 51TKA AVE 1312 ALL BLVD NEWBERG, OR 97132 T ARD,0 7223 25104AA-04800 2S104AA-0460 RUSSELL DAVID E II 8�DENISE M TIG D Y OF 12500 SW 127TH AVE 1312 HALL BIVD TIGARD, OR 97223 TI ARD,O 97223 25104A D-04300 2S 104AD-00400 SEVERSON EVERETT O TORRES ROSENDO HERNANDEZ 8 c/o DENNIS OLSON BOTELLO MARIA ODILIA 12540 SW WALNUT 12755 SW MARIE CT TIGARD, OR 97223 TIGARD,OR 97223 2 S 103 BC•04900 2 S 104AD-04500 SHULTS BRUCE L TUALATIN VALLEY FIRE&RESCUE 12625 SW 124TH 2O665 SW BLANTON ST TIGARD, OR 97223 ALOHA,OR 97007 2S103BC-08900 2S103B8•03301 VANBEBBER SUZANNE YANDLEFAMILY REVOCABLE TRUST 12840 SW BLUE HERON PL BY JOHN C/HEATHER A YANDLE TRS TIGARD, OR 97223 2804 MISSION COLLEGE BLVD SANTA CLARA,CA 95054 2S104AA-90181 2S103B6-00700 WAKEFIELD ANDREW B YINGER FAMILY REVOC TRUST 12658 SW KAREN ST#18 BY KENT L/DEBORAH L YINGER TRS TIGARD, OR 97223 12545 SW 124TH AVE PORTLAND,OR 97223 2S104AA-04700 251038C-09900 WATSON MITCHELL F/MARY P ZAKRZEWSKI CHAPIN ORR 29650 NW OLSON RD 12785 SW BLUE HERON PL GASTON,OR 97119 TIGARD,OR 97223 2S103BC-05001 WING LOUIE FAMILY LIMITED PARTNE PO BOX 86404 PORTLAND, OR 97206 2S10388-05800 WINKLER L DUANE/MARIE B 12520 SW 124TH AVE TIGARD, OR 97223 2S�oaAa-o52o0 WINSTON MARK 8 WINSTON ZSUZSANNA 14925 SW 100TH AVE TIGARD, OR 97224 2S104AA-05100 WI ON RK&ZSUZSANNA 14925 TH AVE TI RD, OR 97224 2 104AA-050 WI MARK&ZSUZSANNA 149 S OOTH AVE T ARD, OR 97224 25104AD-02600 WIRTHLIN JOSEPH E 12919 SW WALNUT TIGARD, OR 97223 2S1038C-08400 WOOD JOANNE 12770 SW BLUE HERON PL TIGARD,OR 97223 . • •� . • Brooks Gaston 3206 Princess Edinburg, TX 78539 Don & Dorothy Erdt 13760 SW 121 st Avenue Tigard, OR 97223 Ellen Beilstein 14630 SW 139�h Avenue Tigard, OR 97224 Martha Bishop 10590 SW Cook Lane Tigard, OR 97223 Vanessa Foster 13085 SW Howard Drive Tigard, OR 97223 Susan Beilke 11755 SW 114�h Place Tigard, OR 97223 CPO 4B 16200 SW Pacific Highway, Suite H242 Tigard, OR 97224 Patricia Keerins 12195 SW 121 st Avenue Tigard, OR 97223 John Frewing 7110 SW Lola Lane Tigard, OR 97223 Gretchen Buehner 13249 SW 136'h Place Tigard, OR 97224 f ITV A� TIGAli�1 _ fLUTRAI IAITGRLCTGfI DARTI[� /�•��.�..,i„��o+��.,�i-,tioi��riT ro.,+.-,i ,�,,,.� i ionnT�n• ��_nn�„_n� ' ' Q � I Q • • ' � � v S PL - � � � (:EUGHHVHIC �NFORMATIUN S15TEM — � W � ;-- �' VICINITY MAP � Q r � � � ------------- �- ? � ANN CT CUP2007-00003 � � � �� _____________ �aREN sT �- TUALATTN VALLEY FIRE &RESCUE � w WALNLIT STA7TON � �.-- - � � __ o _ o_ /� Q AV E � � o° � 4 ` rCT ' OQ� a BROOK CT N 12 �� '��D�O o°° - � ^ N �i� � > , Q LEGEND: 0 — . sw N j sUBJECT -, w ^ � / SITE -�-� � Q 2 T- � � / \ _ti�:RR � � � � ; � � � �J P�.N ��y - �, _ � � � MARIE `- �' , �� • - C T 5� ; - - D � � = '` ; � R�. \� �4,�. G ' 1 lIlRD\ yf/ -->9oNiT� ! rn ,� �y� � I--�` ; � . ; • �i � � ��lRN4� I Rp �� TIPPITT F � „ �' � �L1 - --� Tigard Area Map a ! � , � N Z I . . � � — T—�-, .J 0 80�60 24�320 400 Feet I � � BLUE HER� +•=3a�r�� LANSDOWNE ,� _ � � � � -� I . AI o C R7^ C T Infortnation on this map is for general location only and LUC /�1 J 1 should be verified with Ihe Development Services Division. � �� 13125 SW Hall Blvd ��. Tigard,OR 97223 ' I (503)639-4771 ' � � - http:/1www.ciSigard.or.us -- ---- -- ----- --- - - ----- - ----- -- — -----�-� - - - Community Development Plot date: Nov 13,2007;C:ImagiclMAGIC03.APR CO�I�MUNITY � CITY OF TIGARD SPAPEI�S ' OREGON 6605 SE Lake Road, Portland, OR 97222 • PO , � Box 22109• Portland, OR 97269 Phone: 503-fi84-0360 Fax: 503-620-3433 Email: legals@commnewspapers.com PUBLIC HEARING ITEM: The following will be considered by the Tigard Hearin�s Officer on Monday December 17.2007 at 7:00 PM at the Tigard Civic Center AFFIDAVIT OF PUBLICATION -Town Ha►�, 131�5 SW Hall Bivd., Tigard, Oregon. Both public oral and written testimony is invited. State of Oregon, County of Washington, SS The public hearing on this matter will be conducted in accordance with the Tigard Municipal Code and the rules of procedure adopted I, Charlotte Allsop, being the first duly sworn, by the Council and available at City Hall or the rules of procedure depose and say that I am the Accounting set forth in Chapter 18.390. Testimony may be submitted in writ- Manager of The Times (serving Tigard, ing prior to or at the public hearing or verbally at the public hear- Tualatin & Sherwood), a newspaper of �ng only. Failure to raise an issue in person or by letter at some general circulation, published at Beaverton, in point prior to the close of the hearing accompanied by statements the aforesaid county and state, as defined by or evidence sufficient to aftord the decision-maker an opportunity to respond to the issue precludes appeal to the Land Use Board of ORS 193.010 and 193.02�, that Appeal based on that issue. Failure to specify the criterion from the Community Development Code or Comprehensive Plan at which a City of Tigard comment is directed precfudes an appeal based on that criterion. CUP 2007-00003 A copy of the application and all documents and evidence submit- TT11060 ted by or on behalf of the applicant and the applicable criteria are available for inspection at no cost. A copy of the staff report will a copy of which is hereto attached, was be made available for inspection at no cost at least seven (7) days published in the entire issue of said prior to the hearing, and copies for all items can also be provided at a reasonable cost. newspaper for Further information may be obtained from the Planning Division � (staff contact: Cheryl Caines) at 13125 SW Hall Blvd., Tigard, weeks in the following issues Oregon 97223,by calling 503-639-4171,or by e-mail to cherylc@ November 29, 2007 tigard-or.gov. CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT(CUP)2007-00003/SENSITIVE LANDS REVIEW(SLR)2007-00004/ ADJUSTMENT(VAR) 2007-00036 -TUALATIN VALLEY FIRE& RESCUE WALNUT STATION- REQUEST: The applicant is requesting Conditional Cse approval C�j��Q`�L ��_ � to construct a new fire station with a community room. Sensitive Charlotte Allsop (Accounting Man er) lands review is required because Krueger Creek and associated November 29, 2007 wetlands are located on the site. The request is to release treated stormwater into the vegetated corridor around the creek. The applicant has also requested an adjustment to reduce the access spacing standards along a collector from 200 feet to 25 feet. � LOCATION: 12585 SW Walnut Street; WCTM 2S 104AD, Tax Lot 4500. ZONE: R-4.5: The R-4.5 zoning district is designed NOTARY UBLIC FOR OREGON to accommodate detached single-family homes with or without My commission expires ��(�v'� �� ..� accessory residential units at a minimum lot size of 7,500 square feet. Duplexes and attached single-family units are permitted conditionally. Some civic and institutional uses are also permitted conditionally. APPLICABLF, REVIEW CRITERIA: Community Acct#10093001 � Development Code Chapters 18.330, 18.360, 18.390, 18.510, Patty Lunsford/Attn:Acctg. 18.705, 18.725, 18J45, 18,765, 18.775, 18.780, 18.790, 18.795 City of Tigard � MY COMMIS� and 18.810. Publish 11/29/20o7 TT11060 13125 SW Hall Bivd. Tigard, OR 97223 — �� 1 „ 1 , � ,___ , , �. _Y 11 `y3T��,�.. �� " . f---� � �'Ii:IN1I�}M:�{' r Size:2 x 11.75 `� ' ...__, _ � Amount Due $196.22 '� ' �r {�V �� 1 _ � { �.� �� f�-, -t-� �.�`t ,-�k, ` -_J C�} , , \.� , �. , "Remit to address above 7 • -%r•—�'�! � "� R'r rl i ,. Tx��T iE� ./.i: �,L., _�__ '-S J i_i ....1 �i { i ~ �-�-t�". � u{i.*.�r. .i crv 1 `''`�t •. '� ��_�—+��;:_,r, , � � �, -< � , � r MY G � �,',a<� \ r . � � / ( �� ; �,': ; � � ` ��`'� _�_aa¢a�y� +F� I ��- �`� �� r � t � `- �-_1 �,� � ; i ;_ ��,�,�,, � ;�:_. �x�;�,h� l � �' i_1..�a��( � � �,�—„�.-r'�� {^., �jj � iscr _j L�. ��' j r�,;;...,.-`�~ '.� , ��;�� _.... _��__ ; r—� � r"'"j��'�` � ,�v >?''. _ _f �,.� I �- � �.�� , � , , � ' � � � � � "� 'T ��V�� , ,�1 ) ��T._.� � � ,�,�`` '� � , , � �1 �� i� � f � �_ `-� }--�-� � � I �� r � � � �= i ��Z �7�-�� . � � ��_� � � f ��:� � i ..1 .�� • -' j � � �_.._j , �_,�..a` i � � i , f...�......._.�1 -�-�,�-� ..- � �� T _� 3 , I �.,. ., .,..... , � � � I I � ' >.HM.,►t�-..-,.._ __. �::. 1..___.. .............. .. ��...... � ..1.... �y�,c:,:s'�r.�..+�:w�nw�� L �� AFFIDAVIT OF MAILING - I, Patricia L. Lunsford,being first dulysworn/affirnl,on oath depose and saythat I am an Administrative Assistant for the City of Tigard, Washington County, Oregon and that I served the following: ,�]aw�k.��,n Knuir&,z(s)Ik4,�. � NOTTCE OF FINAL ORDER FOR CIJP2007-00003/SLR2007-00004/VAR2007-00036/SGN2007-00171 - TUALATTN VALLEY FIRE &RESCCTE (File No./1�Fame ReEerence) � AMENDEDNOTIC�. HEARING BODY: HEARING DA7E: ❑ Caty of T"igard Plaruzing Director � T'igardHeanngsOfficer (12/17/2007) ❑ T'igard Plazuiuig Commission ❑ T'igard Caty Council A copyof the said notice being hereto attached,marked E�ibit"A",and byreference made a part hereof,was mailed to each named person(s) at the address(s) shown on the attached list(s),marked Exhibit"B",and byreference made a part hereof,on December 20,2007, and deposited in the United States Mail on December 20,2007,postage prepaid. ��G�/�. � � t�IG�/ (Perso t d N ' e) STATE OF OREGON County of Washington ss. City of Tigard � Subscribed and sworn/affirmed before me on the �� dayof ��u�� ,200 . OFFICIAL SEAL Q\ p�'l.tll/� sF11RLEY L TREAT NOTARY PUBLIC-ORE(iON N ARY PUB C OF ORE GO COMMISSION NO.4187T7 . . . ��/ MY COFAMI3SION EXPIRES APRIL 25,2011 My Corrurvssion Expires: � 120 DAYS =2/29/2008 EXH I B IT.�.. DATE OF FILING: 12/19/20C ., DATE MAILED: 12/20/2007 : CITY OF TIGARD Washington County, Oregon N�TICE OF FINAL ORDER BY THE HEARINGS OFFICER Case Numbers: CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT CLJP 2007-00003 SENSITIVE LANDS REVIEW SLR 2007-00004 AD USTMENT VAR 2007-000 6 SI N PERMIT SGN 2007-00171 Case Name: TUALATIN VALLEY FIRE &RESCUE WALNUT STATION 50 Applicant's Name/Address: Tualatin Valle Fire &Rescue 20665 SW Blanton Street Aloha Ore on 97007 Owner's Name/Address: Same as a �icant Address of Propeny. 12585 S alnut Street Ti ard Ore on 97224 Tax Ma /Lot Nos.: Washin on Co. Tax Assessor's Ma No.2S104AD T�Lot 4500. A FINAL ORDER INCORPORATTNG THE FACI'S, FINDINGS AND CONQ.USIONS APPROVING A RE�UEST FOR A O�NDI"ITONAL LISE. SENSITTVE LANDS REVIEW, AN ADjUSTNIENT AND A SIGN PERNIIT T�-�E QTY OF TIGARD HEARINGS OFFIC�R HAS REVIEWED T'HE APPLICANI''S PLANS,NARRATIVE,MATERIALS,COMI��NTS OF REVIEWING AGENQES, THE PLAN1�iING DIVISIONS STAFF REPORT AND REGOI��IlvIENDA7TONS FOR THE APPLICATION DESCRIBED IN FUR"1'HER DETAIL IN T�-iE STAFF REPORT. THE HEARINGS OFFICER HELD A PUBLIC HEARING ON DECEMBER 17. 2007 TO RECEIVE TESTTMONY REGARDING '1�--IIS APPLICATTON. 'TF-IIS DEQSION HAS BEEN BASED ON T'HE FACTS,FINDINGS AND CONCLUSIONS CONTAII�TED WIT�IIN TF-IIS FINAL ORDER Summary: ➢ Conditional Use Permit a�pproval for a fire station that will include an apparatus bay for three fire engines, staff dornutones, locker rooms, kitchen, duung and day room, offices exercise room and storage. The fire station will also provide a 767 square foot commuruty room that will be availa�le forp ublic use. The applicant will �rovide off-street parkuig for station staff, the community room and the adjacent park The applicant also received ensitrve Lands Review a proval for construction of stormwater facilities within the Krue er �'a-eek buffer area, an Adjustment to reduce thePdriveway spacing requirements along a collector from 200 feet to�5 feet and a Sign Pernut for a double-faced freestanding sign. At the December 17, 2007 public hearin , the Hearings Officer approved this request, subject to conditions of approval contained within this final o�er. Zone: R 4.5: Low-Density Residential District. A licable Review Criteria: Communi Development Code Chapters 18330, 18.360, 18390, 18.510, 18.705, 18.725, 18.74 , 18,765, 18.775, 18.780, 18.790, 18.79�and 18.810. Action: ➢ O Approval as Requested ❑x Approval with Conditions ❑ Denial Notice: Notice was published in the newspaper and mailed to: ❑x Owners of Record within the Required Distance X❑ Affected Government Agencies � Interested Parties � The Applicanu and Owners The adopted findin s of fact and decision can be obtained from the Plaruling Division/Commuruty Development Department at the �ty of Tigard Pernut Center at City Hall. Final Decision: THIS DECISION IS FINAL ON DECEMBER 20, 2007 AND BECOMES EFFEC`I'IVE ON ANUARY 8, 2008 LJNLESS AN APPEAL IS FILED. Appeal: The decision of the Review Authority is final for purposes of appeal on the date that it is mailed. Any party with standin as provided in Section 18390.040.G.1. may appeal this decision u-i accordance with Section 18.39D.040.G.2. of the �igard Community Developm� ent Code which provides that a written appeal together with the re quired fee shall be f�1ed with the Director within ten (10) business days of the date the notice of the decision was ma�led. The �a peal fee schedule and forn�s are available from the Planning Division of Tigard City Hall, 13125 SW Hall oulevard, Tigard, Oregon 97223. THE DEADLINE FOR FILING AN APPEAL IS 5:00 PM ON ANUARY 7, 2008. Questions: If you have any questions, please call the City of Ti�ard Planning Division at (503) 639-4171. BEFORE THE LAND USE HEARINGS OFFICER FOR THE CITY OF TIGARD, OREGON Regarding an application by Tualatin Valley Fire & Rescue) F I N A L O R D E R for a conditional use pennit and sensitive lands review ) to construct and operate an 11,882 square foot fire station ) CUP2007-00003 at 12585 SW Walnut Street in the City of Tigard, Oregon )(TVF&R Walnut Station) A. SUMMARY l. Gary Wells filed the application far Tualatin Valley Fire & Rescue ("TVF&R" or the "applicant"). The applicant requests approval of a conditional use permit to construct and operate an 11,882 square foot fire station at 12585 SW Walnut Street; also known as tax lot 4500 WCTM 2S104AD (the "site"). The fire station will include an apparatus bay for three fire engines, staff dormitories, locker rooms, kitchen, dining and day room, offices, exercise room and storage. The fire station will also provide a 767 square foot community room that will be available for public use. The applicant will provide off-street parking for station staff, the community room and the adjacent park. The applicant also requests sensitive lands review far construction of stormwater facilities within the Krueger Creek buffer area, an adjustment to reduce the driveway spacing requirements along a collector from 200 feet to 25 feet and a sign permit for a double-faced freestanding sign. Additional basic facts about the site and surrounding land and applicable approval standards are provided in the Staff Report to the Hearings Officer dated December 10, 2007 (the " Staff Report"), incorporated herein by reference. 2. Tigard Hearings Officer Joe Turner (the "hearings officer") conducted a duly noticed public hearing to receive testimony and evidence in the matter. At the public hearing, City staff recommended conditional approval of the application. Representatives of the applicant testified in support of the application. One person testified orally in support of the application. One person testified orally with questions and concerns. Other persons testified in writing. Disputed issues in this case include: a. Whether the proposed development complies with CWS buffer requirements for streams and wetlands; b. Whether the City can require a larger stream buffer to protect water quality and wildlife habitat; and c. Whether the development provides an adequate number of off-street parking spaces. 3. The hearings officer concludes that the applicant sustained the burden of proof for a conditional use permit based on the findings and conclusions included and incorporated herein and subject to conditions at the end of this final order. B. HEARING AND RECORD 1. The hearings officer held a duly noticed public hearing on December 17, 2007 to receive and consider public testimony in this matter. The record includes a wimess list, materials in the casefile as of the close of the record, including materials submitted after the hearing, and an audio record of the hearing. At the beginning of the hearing, the hearings officer made the declaration required by ORS 197.763. The hearings officer disclaimed any ex parte contacts, bias or conflicts of interest. The following is a summary by the hearings officer of selected relevant testimony offered at the hearing. 2. City planner Cheryl Caines summarized the Staff Report. a. She noted that the City received a written comment from Verizon Communications stating that phone sen�ice is available to the site. b. The City also received a letter from Sue Beilke, director of the Biodiversity Project of Tigard and vice-president of Friends of Summer Creek. Ms. Beilke argued that the proposed 50-foot stream buffer should be measured from the edge of the wetland associated with the stream, based on CWS regulations. Ms. Beilke further argued that the 50-foot buffer is inadequate to protect water quality and wildlife. The buffer should be increased to a minimum 200 feet. Ms. Caines noted that CWS issued a service provider letter approving the proposed buffer. The City has no authority to require a larger vegetated corridor or otherwise apply CWS's regulations in this proceeding. c. She noted that the applicant submitted a supplemental sight distance analysis dated November 29, 2007. d. In response to Ms. Cameron's testimony, she testified that the stream setback requirements are determined by CWS. The applicant proposed to remove two trees on the site, but all of the trees near the stream will remain. The parking requirements are based on the size of the facility and the meeting room. 3. City engineer Kim McMillan testified that CWS issued a service provider letter accepting the 50-foot buffer proposed by the applicant. The applicant must obtain formal approval from CWS before the City will issue building permits for the fire station. She opined that traffic generated by the proposed facility will be imperceptible to surrounding residents. 4. Planner Frank Angelo and TVF&R Division Chief Gary Wells testified for the applicant. a. Mr. Angelo accepted the findings and conditions in the Staff Report with one exception outlined in his December 17, 2007 letter. He noted that there are no overhead utility lines along the site's Walnut Street frontage. Therefore condition of approval 28 should be deleted. He testified that many fire stations provide community rooms. The 767 square foot community meeting room proposed on this site will accommodate a maximum of roughly 20 CUP2007-00003/SLR2007-00004/VAR1007-00036/SG.�V?007-00171 Hearings Officer Final Order (TVF&R Walnut Station) Page 2 people. The Fire District can control the use of the room. He waived the applicant's right to submit a final written argument. b. Mr. Wells testified that the site is located in an area that is currently underserved by TVF&R. Response times in the area range from ten to twelve minutes, compared to six ininute average response times in the remainder of TVF&R's service area. The proposed fire station is expected to reduce response times in the area to six minutes or less, consistent with the remainder of TVF&R's service area. 5. Mark Padgett, president of the Quail Hollows homeowners association testified in support of the application. He argued that the proposed fire station will increase public health, safety and welfare. 6. Donna Cameron questioned whether the facility provides sufficient parking to accommodate the proposed community room and the adjacent park. She questioned whether the facility will be setback away from the stream and associated wetlands. The "swampy areas" extend some distance away from the stream. She questioned whether the applicant will remove trees near the stream. 7. At the end of the hearing, the hearings officer closed the public record and announced his intention to approve the application subject generally to recommended conditions in the Staff Report. C. DISCUSSION 1. The Staff Report identifies the applicable approval criteria for the application and applies them to the record in the case. The hearings officer agrees that the standards identified in the Staff Report are applicable and finds that they are correctly applied to the facts of the case in the Staff Report. Substantial evidence in the record shows that the proposed use does or can comply with the applicable approval criteria for a CUP, and adoption of recommended conditions of approval as amended will ensure final plans are submitted and implemented as approved consistent with those criteria and standards and will prevent, reduce or mitigate potential adverse impacts of the development consistent with the requirements of the TMC. The hearings officer adopts the findings and conclusions in the Staff Report, as modified, as his own. 2. The photographs attached to Mr. Angelo's December 17, 20071etter demonstrate that there are no overhead utility lines along the site's Walnut Street frontage. Therefore condition of approval should be deleted. 3. Ms. Beilke argued that the stream buffer should be measured from the edge of the wetland, rather than from the stream, based on CWS regulations. However the hearings officer has no authority to construe or apply CWS's regulations. The hearings officer finds that the proposed buffer is sufficient to comply with CWS's regulations based on the CWS service provider letter CWS approved site plan. Exhibit B of the application. There is no substantial evidence to the contrary. If Ms. Beilke disagrees with CWS's determination she can appeal it consistent with CWS's regulations. CUP2007-00003/SLR2007-00004/VAR2007-00036/SGN2007-00171 Hearings Officer Final Order (TVF&R Walnut Station) Page 3 a. The hearings officer has no authority to require a larger buffer in this case to protect water quality and wildlife. b. The applicant did not propose a trail within the stream buffer with this application. If a trail is proposed in the future it will be subject to further review at that time. 4. The hearings officer finds that the proposed development complies with the approval criteria for sensitive lands review based on the findings in the Staff Report. There is no substantial evidence to the contrary. 5. The hearings officer finds that the proposed facility provides an adequate number of off-street parking spaces to accomrnodate the demands of the proposed fire station, including the community meeting room. As discussed in the Staff Report, TMC 18.765 requires a minimum of 31 and a maximum of 45 off-street parking spaces to accommodate the uses proposed on the site. The applicant proposed 39 spaces which meets both minimum and maximum standards. The applicant is not required to provide parking for the park, since park development is not proposed with this application. D. CONCLUSIONS Based on the findings and discussion provided ar incorporated in this final order, the hearings officer concludes that the applicant sustained the burden of proof that the proposed conditional use permit does or will comply with the applicable criteria of the Community Development Code, provided development that occurs after this decision complies with applicable local, state, and federal laws and with conditions of approval warranted to ensure such compliance occurs in fact. E. DECISION In recognition of the findings and conclusions contained herein, and incorporating the Staff Report and public testimony and exhibits received in this matter, the hearings officer hereby approves CUP2007-00003 (TVF&R Walnut Station), subject to the following conditions of approval: CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL THE FOLLOWING CONDITIONS SHALL BE SATISFIED PRIOR TO THE ISSUANCE OF SITEBUILDING PERMITS: Submit to the Planning Department (Cheryl Caines, 639-4171, ext. 2437) for review and approval: 1. Prior to site work the applicant shall submit a revised site plan far review and approval that shows a buffer along the eastern parking lot that meets the standards of Table 18.745.2 (buffer requirement "C"). CUP2007-00003/SLR2007-00004/VAR2007-00036/SUN2007-00171 Hearings Officer Final Order (TVF&R Walnut Station) Page 4 2. Prior to the issuance of building permits, the applicant shall submit a screening detail plan for the rooftop air conditioner. 3. Prior to the issuance of building permits, the applicant shall submit plans for review and approval to ensure that traffic flow is clear to all users. 4. Prior to commencing site work, the applicant shall submit construction drawings to both Planning and Engineering that include: A. Protection measures for all trees to be retained on-site including street trees. B. A note prohibiting equipment, vehicles, machinery, grading, dumping, storage, burial of debris, or any other construction-related activities in any tree protection zone; and C. A note stating that only those trees identified on the approved Tree Removal plan are authorized for removal by this report. Notwithstanding any other provision of this title, any party found to be in violation of this chapter [18.790] pursuant to Chapter 1.16 of the Tigard Municipal Code shall be subject to a civil penalty of up to $500 and shall be required to remedy any damage caused by the violation. Such remediation shall include, but not be limited to, the following: 1) Replacement of unlawfully removed or damaged trees in accordance with Section 18.790.060 (D) of the Tigard Development Code; and 2) Payment of an additional civil penalty representing the estimated value of any unlawfully removed or damaged tree, as determined using the most current International Society of Arboriculture's Guide for Plant Appraisal. 5. Prior to commencing site work, the applicant shall establish fencing as directed by the project arborist to protect the trees to be retained. The applicant shall call for an inspection and allow access by the City Arborist for the purpose of monitoring the tree protection to verify that the tree protection measures are performing adequately. 6. The applicant shall have an on-going responsibility to ensure that the Project Arborist has submitted written reports to the City Arborist, at least once every two weeks, as the Project Arborist monitors the construction activities from initial tree protection zone (TPZ) fencing installation through the building construction phases. The reports shall evaluate the condition and ]ocation of the tree protection fencing, determine if any changes occurred to the TPZ, and if any part of the Tree Protection Plan has been violated. If the reports are not submitted to the City Arborist at the scheduled intervals, and if it appears the TPZ's or the Tree Protection Plan are not being followed by the contractor or a sub-contractor, the City can stop work on the project until an inspection can be done by the City Arborist and the Project Arborist. Prior to issuance of any Certificates of Occupancy, the Project Arborist will submit a final certification indicating the elements of the Tree Protection Plan were followed and that all remaining trees on the site are healthy, stable, and viable in their modified growing environment. 7. If work is required within an established tree protection zone, the project arborist shall prepare a proposal detailing the construction techniques to be employed and the likely impacts to the trees. The proposal shall be reviewed and approved by the City Arborist CUP2007-00003/SLR2007-00004/VAR2007-00036/SGN2007-00171 Hearings Ojf cer Final Order (TVF&R Walnut Station) Page 5 before proposed work can proceed within a tree protection zone. The City Arborist may require changes priar to approval. The project arborist shall be on site while �vork is occurring within the tree protection zone and submit a summary report certifying that the work occurred per the proposal and will not significantly impact the health and/or stability of the trees. 8. Prior to issuance of building permits, the applicant (developer or builder) shall: A. Submit site plan drawings showing the accurate location of the trees that were preserved, the location of tree protection fencing. B. Submit a statement and signature of approval from a certified arborist regarding building and infrastructure siting techniques to be employed in construction with respect to any protected trees on site. Submit to the Engineering Department (Kim McMillan, 639-4171, ext. 2642) for re��iew and approval: 9. Prior to issuance of a site permit, a Public Facility Improvement (PFI) pennit is required for this project to cover street improvements and any other work in the public right-of- way. Six (6) sets of detailed public improvement plans shall be submitted for review to the Engineering Department. NOTE: these plans are in addition to any drawings required by the Building Division and should only include sheets relevant to public improvements. Public Facility Improvement (PFI) permit plans shall conform to City of Tigard Public Improvement Design Standards, which are available at City Hall and the City's web page (www.ti arg d_or•�ov). 10. The PFI permit plan submittal shall include the exact legal name, address and telephone number of the individual or corporate entity who will be designated as the "Permittee", and who will provide the financial assurance for the public improvements. For example, specify if the entity is a corporation, limited partnership, LLC, etc. Also specify the state within which the entity is incorporated and provide the name of the corporate contact person. Failure to provide accurate information to the Engineering Department will delay processing of project documents. 11. The applicant shall provide a construction vehicle access and parking plan for approval by the City Engineer. The purpose of this plan is for parking and traffic control during the public improvement construction phase. 12. Prior to issuance of the Site Permit, the applicant shall pay the addressing fee. (STAFF CONTACT: Bethany Stewart, Engineering). 13. Prior to issuance of the PFI Permit the applicant shall submit plans for the emergency vehicle traffic signal for review and approval. 14. The applicant shall revise the plans to move the westerly driveway 10 feet to the west to align with the driveway across Walnut Street. CUP2007-00003/SLR2007-00004/VAR?007-00036/SGN2007-00171 Hearings Officer Final Order (TVF&R Walnut Station) Page 6 • r 14. The applicant shall revise the plans to move the westerly driveway 10 feet to the west to align with the driveway across Walnut Street. 15. The applicant shall work with the adjacent property owner to remove a portion of the existing fence to obtain a minimum 400 feet of sight distance from the westerly driveway. 16. The applicant shall obtain approval from the TVF&R Deputy Fire Marshall II for the proposed number and placement of hydrants prior to issuance of the City's Public Faci]ity Improvement permit. 17. Final design plans and calculations for the proposed private water quality and detention facility shall be submitted to the Engineering Department (Kim McMillan) as a part of the Public Facility Improvement (PFIj permit plans. Included with the plans shall be a � proposed landscape plan and maintenance plan. 18. An erosion control plan shall be provided as part of the Public Facility Improvement (PFI) permit drawings. The plan shall conform to the "Erosion Prevention and Sediment Control Design and Planning Manual, February 2003 edition." 19. The applicant shall obtain a 1200-C General Permit issued by the City of Tigard pursuant to ORS 468.740 and the Federal Clean Water Act. THE FOLLOWING CONDITIONS SHALL BE SATISFIED PRIOR TO A F1NAL BUILDING INSPECTION: Submit to the Ylanning Department (Chcryl Caines, 639-4171, ext. 2437) for review and approval: Z0. Prior to final building inspection, the applicant shall install a shield on the light pole adjacent to tax lots 4700 and 4800 or direct light away from neighboring residential uses. 21. Prior to final building inspection, the applicant shall record a deed restriction to the effect that any existing tree greater than 6 inches diameter may be removed only if the tree dies or is hazardous according to a certified arbarist. The deed restriction may be removed or will be considered invalid if a tree preserved in accordance with this decision should either die or be removed as a hazardous tree. 22. Prior to final building inspection, the applicant shall submit a summary of the biweekly arborist reports prepared by the Project Arborist. The summary shall document the effect of the approved tree protection plan, account for any violations, and certify the condition of protected trees. CUP2007-00003/SLR2007-00004/VAR2007-00036/SGN2007-00171 Hearings O�eer Final Order (TVF&R Walnut Station) Page 7 Submit to the Engineering Department (Kim McMillan, 639-4171, ext. 2642) for review and approval: ?3. Prior to a final building inspection, the applicant shall complete the required public improvements, obtain conditional acceptance from the City, and provide a one-year maintenance assurance for said improvements. 24. Additional right-of-way shall be dedicated to the Public along the frontage of SW Walnut Street to increase the right-of-way to 3S feet from the centerline for the full length of the frontage (including the east and west ends). The description shall be tied to the existing right-of-way centerline. The dedication document shall be on City forms. Instructions are available from the Engineering Department. 25. Prior to final building inspection, the applicant shall restore the striping of the bike lane along the frontage of SW Walnut Street. 26. Prior to final building inspection, the applicant's engineer shall provide final sight distance certification for the westerly driveway. 27. Prior to final building inspection, the emergency vehicle traffic signal shall be fully operational and accepted by the City Engineer. 28. To ensure compliance with Clean Water Services design and construction standards, the applicant shall employ the design engineer responsible for the design and specifications of the private water quality facility to perform construction and visual observation of the water quality facility for compliance with the design and specifications. These inspections shall be made at significant stages, and at completion of the construction. Prior to final building inspection, the design engineer shall provide the City of Tigard Engineering staff with written confirmation that the water quality facility is in compliance with the design and specifications. FAILURE TO SATISFY THE CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL WITHIN 18 MONTHS OF THE EFFECTNE DATE OF THE HEARINGS OFFICER'S DECISION SHALL RENDER THE HEARINGS OFFICER'S DECISION VOID. DATED this 19`h day of December 2007. Joe Turner, Esq., AICP City of Tigard Land Use Hearings Officer CUP2007-00003/SLR2007-00004/VAR2007-00036/SGN2007-�0171 Hearings Officer Final Order (TVF&R Walnut Station) Page 8 ----�, ---- r�;��,, � ' ;_ I I l �`i—� ! I i f�'I --- _�— �Q ; � Q� � , . - . _—J _ l� �\ � LS PL r � � i � � ��F�.�ASP„�. �FOaM�r��, srsrEM � ' ' �l� 7 �� ''� � ---� �� --� ' �__ � VICINITY MAP �� i--� i �' � �/� �Q� --(- � , � - ' , �� Q -1 i E--1 �-�— � _ ! _____________ i � __�l � �� i-- - ,� � �= CUP2007-00003 I -�� ; �T T _J � ---- TUALATIN VALLEY � �I � - FIRE &RE S CUE ; ' w WALNU�I'STATION ' 0 0 — > - � o o Q Av E m d o � ' d I — � o BROOK C , L r °00000 000aoo o � � � � � � _-_ LEGEND: � 0 sw N sUBJECT � � SITE , � , > � -- _ � N�.� ' �,�:::,«;:, ; ��N P�' �E�" "° �'�" �, % �3� . I N e � .�. RIE C -- � s`� �� ` ' - T I I _ 41 ` i y.I I �T'.i't RU. V , _f �. 4° . ��.J+1:'.� I � ? y I I ltE3 E�tK f.U. � I D�.iiih-�..i P,�: ' TIPPITT F r —�� J � a Tiqartl Area Map � � N Z , J 0 80 �60 2a0 320 400 Feel \ � E 7..=387�eet I I I _1 iF . �.;��..Y,e § •. ' �_...�._._�.,..-_-..�:�. Informatan on thls map 1s fa generel bcalbn only and - AL B E RTA ST 51aWG De verified with ihe Developmenl Serv�ces Oiviian. 13125 Sw Hall Blvtl � Tigard,OR 97223 r I�� (503)639-4t71 �tlpi/www.ci ligara.w.us � Community Development Plot date: Nov 13,2007;C:ImagiclMAGIC03.APR i __ y �' � , ..�,..r.. . r e� p i I ,�..e i a� -; � _° _�.` P B S „r� : t i � t � � � i � i 5 ,.+�'" .. . . . t � "'"��rtp�c7ioc�rroN '° r �Je �..,�. i . +�€ �,'�....... � ..,�,„� •'�K«,.� fi i .•' ` Y Y c,s�°,",�?�r, c:�v�sw�ia C . . eca°anwr . r 4A d�" �"_ �� f �'�� C . .� � � �..._.., � ' -� ..a...�.�F N�� {.rf ��c � a /\ SITE VICINITY MAP °e,��`` � 52.N2 5 f a(nwn „ '"""a" EO (1.7��CRES) ' . edMU�* /�i� � lOP a ewMt d`� , . � �./u'" �''�CR55 POM .�0 f,ObM�1fA �d• . . � —..—..— — ��—°-x a,•• 6ENEWLL NOTES ��./ co.m,kiw v�.u.�rin.cwr.nc�«.ncw..uorrH�oEVTM �xp wufN15� Ewl�iwG U�11E5 PN�0�1�0 B[fi�xwG � �+r:�SS �smrcnoi r m�cx.rcn�rt�r � VErtun '• " rvm san � Vh trisn.c ui�unit�afucn rw 1[M[o,sM.cnw � eo,w�w. wlsrz s�ani,a �'q x. � . / . � UTILITY NUMBERE Q /�, arvovT�cario sw.97s.e�� F- R�� TIGARDPUBL�CWORKS 503.1tH.3596 E"'� W �ay"� ,\ CLEANWRTERSERVICES 503.6B1.JGp0 � � � . . � ' � NF6R 503.8�2.�000 ,'� � ��e- - . OWEST 800.2M.1111 � y O / NWNATURALGAS 503.II8.�211 � �C7 PGE 5032268322 ' Kq..,� �MOEx ro wewrmMOS z z o - ��M� � : G0.0 CNIL COVER M1D SRE MIPROVEAIEHT PIAN � � C0.1 ExISTING CONOITIONS ¢ 3� � � - S� . C1.0 UTLITY PIAN Q ..�� . �5-M�� ,. C/.t STORMWATERPIAN 3 �(7 ' Cl.] GMOING AND EROSION CONiRpI P4W . .. . � � � . �r_�»w � C2.0 ERO° aCONTROIOET/Jlg (yy m� - � . T � � CI.1 6TORMWATERpET�$ _y N - � . _��a . -��' . C2.Z WATEROETAILS w ^ . .= 31.BB9 S.f � ' - Y (0.)J ACRES) � � �' i � � . .I' � -� ,�� »»ti I rym. _ . �: .� r,.wf�t . . . . ' . �wsiwcunin "t��.0 . :'� � . .�.� � /"/ ,.. ' .. _ i uzrcn� � �•: . / y, �_ . ' . , . "__ _'i-� � � �. � / .. ' '- . . .� � _ i•�� .[we./.. ,.,,,,,a '� : '-�-I,�- -- -- • � �t«�� , � �- • � i �;1� .� , _ � �,,. . . - .. . � .- � i.i u�w�anoso i � . "L J -- -- - 'o,..»�.:s;.j �::.K�� n�,..< � �,.�o� ��_ _ .� , ��\\//\\,,yy��((((�5,5//�t�� , � ` - --- ----- — L— —�i.— -- ---`�J L1J . / _ �EFOREYa�01G �� . , S.W. WALNUT STREET � .. " ''°0°'��''31'` AMD� Y�nIM �I.IIWEIEIfI .. . �M rvM1�M1-\ . . MAM � �� . su�� SITE SUMMARY� � �..zrono�a�. . rw'(rutGEU: zslaAOasoo °""" SITE AREA 327 ALRES(U2.23I 5�.FT.) ! ' CpAP PIAN DEBN'a1NTION: LOW OENSITY RESDENTy�L SITE IMPROVEMENT LEGEND zOWN�psTRIGT R�.S �,1,J -"a.�,4a Yn ,r�� WARTE0.SECl10N: SE 7/�OF SEC 1.T2N H1W W.M. I' Y � y4}�f l..h'u 1 .y�h :I� : - �usmc cwracrt sa�ut : �., i,-,. - .,;ii-�� GENERAL INFORMATION: b . . � . .. O Mw�sn�w�is��E�[Hi GRpPEqN OMMER: �CHITECT' AVPLICANT: CML ENGMlEER: ��b� TUKA�INVALLEViNiE6fiE5GVE PSEMCWTEGTS ANOELOPL�N!lWGGRWP PBSENGWEERINGNIDEM�IftOf�IMENTAL ' ��tiss ccvinco s�wn[ cawr m 1��i�'-o) � u V uoncMrzCVO[+w� 750 COMMERCI�I VMMWAY BOB Tl1RAPP FRAIN(ANGELO GUY NEAL C O�O ILLOMN.OF Hti SW CORBETf�VENUE g10 Sw AWN.SURE 301 i1�0 W W STREET FM�. ]60.6W.B5]1 PORTLN�D,OR9i1(It PORTIAND.OR977U5 VANCOUVER.W�Ielfi60 ( TYPICAL ONSITE PAVEMENT CROSS-SECTION FN(:750.89/.B157 aw: soas�es+io a�+: soa.zz�ezzs vH. xo.eeow�+ sc.�t�ac E-MAIL�.lyblcMwQn.can FA%:SO].7M.OZ2J FA1L'S03.Ili.1619 FAL]BO.fiB8.8(184 O/EEt 1 Of� - E#NK:WiPVOWw�.ram E-MN�:pry_nW�jpWem+.om 4T�lpNwwG� . EXH I B IT��. Tualatin Valley Fire &Rescue CUI'2007-00003 Attn: Gary Wells TUALATIN VALLEY FIRE &RESCiJE 20665 SW Blanton Street Aloha, OR 97007 STATION 50 Angelo Planning Group Attn: Frank Angelo "NOTICE OF FINAL ORDER BY THE 921 SW Washington Street, Suite 468 HEARINGS OFFICER" Portland, OR 97205 Mark Padgett 12974 SW Princeton Lane Tigard, OR 97223 Donna Cameron 12490 SW Walnut Street Tigard, OR 97223 Sue Beilke The Biodiversity Project of Tigard 11755 SW 114`h Place Tigard, OR 97223 � � . . PRE�APP.F�LD BY CITY OF TIGARD PLANNING DIVISION _ �� LAND USE PERMIT APPLICATION ��r . City of Tigard Pemat C',ertter 13125 SWHaII Blzz�, Tigart� OR 97223 Phar�• 503.639.4171 Fax:503.598.1960 File# � � �' �000 Other Case# �L�;Lo-p"1-o1;i.�C�-�. J A 2 �c�'1 - �-�'�' s lo Date I� nI By S i�� Receipt�# ��7 ��'g Fee �' �� 'SU Date Complete �� TYPE OF PERMIT YOU ARE APPLYING FOR [�Adjustment/Variance(I or I� ❑Minor Land Partition(II) ❑ Zone Change (III) ❑ Comprehensive Plan Amendment(I� ❑Planned Development(III� ❑ Zone Change Annexation(I� [v]�Conditional Use (IIn [�Sensitive Lands Review(1,II or III) ❑ Zone Ordinance Amendment(I� ❑H�storic Overlay(II or III) ❑ Site Development Review(II) ❑ Home Occupation(II) ❑Subdivision(II or IIn L ms a 125g5 SW W{�LNUT STI�E�T TIGA-I2D, �l�223 � . ZS 104AD0450o . 2a A�� . R'+.5 �-i�u TuA�I�T�r� vAwr�( F��E �N� �SCu� N 2oh�5 5w g�u-ror� sr+�, ��oµ� , o� q�-oo�- H N . (503) 64q-85��- (So3) by2-��55 RIMARY Ga�RY w��S C5o3) 642-0331 PROPER OWNE EE H E Attac t more one SA ME AS A�iDV� A "`When the owner and the applicant are different people,the applicant must be the purchaser of record or a lessee in possession with written authorization from the owner or an agent of the owner. The owners must sign this application in the space provided on the back of this form or submit a written authorization with this a lication. PROPOSAL SUMMARY P ease spec'ic �� N � � F � ` '1"; � APPLICATIONS WILL NOT BE ACCEPTED WITHOUT ALL OF THE REQLTIRED SUBMITTAL ELEMENTS AS DESCRIBED IN THE "BASIC SUBMITTAL REQUIREMENTS" INFORMATION SHEET. i:\curpin\masters\land use applications\land use pemzit app.doc � 1 THE APPLIC.ANT SHALL CERTIFY THAT: ♦ If the application is granted,the applicant shall exercise the righu granted in accordance with the terms and subject to all the conditions and limitations of the approval. ♦ All the above statements and the statements in the plot plan, attachments, and e�ibits transmitted herewith, are true; and the applicants so acknowledge that any pernlit issued,based on this application, map be revoked if it is f ound that any such statements are f alse. ♦ The applicant has read the entire contents of the application,including the policies and criteria, and understands the requirements for approving or denying the application(s). SIGNATURES OF EACH OWNER OF THE SUBJECT PROPERTY ARE REQUIRED. �-- i�l� 7�9�b 7 Owne�'s Sig Date Owne�'s Signature Date Owne�'s Signature Date Owne�s Signature Date Owne�'s Signature Date r � P�w� -��i z /D�- p icant/Agent/ epresentative's Signature Date Applicant/Agent/Representative's Signature Date I � � :'e� I :..��. � LAND USE PROPOSAL DE SCRIPTION �� - ;� � ,. � � 120 DAYS = 2/29/2008 � � FILE NOS.: CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT (CUP) 2007-00003 SENSITTVE LANDS REVIEW(SLR) 2007-00004 ��'I1V��(VAR)�2�-00036 !� �QO?-DO1?l FILE TITLE: TUALATIN VALLEY FIRE & RESCUE WALNUT STATION APPLICANT/ Tualatin Valley Fire &Rescue APPLICANT'S Angelo Planning Group OWNER Attn: Gary Wells REPRESENTATIVE: Attn: Frank Angelo 20665 SW Blanton St. 921 SW Washington St., Suite 468 Aloha,OR 97007 Portland, OR 97205 REQUEST: The applicant is requesting Conditional Use approval to construct a new fire station with a commuruty room. Sensitive lands review is required because Krueger Cxeek and associated wetlands are located on the site. The request is to release treated stormwater into the vegetated corridor around the creek. The app licant has also requested an adjustment to reduce the access spacing standards along a collector from 200 feet to 25 feet. LOCATION: 12585 SW Walnut Street;WCTM 2S 104AD,Tax Lot 4500. ZONE: R 4.5: The R 4.5 zoning district is desig�ned to accommodate detached single-family homes with or without accessoryresidential units at a inu7unum lot size of 7,500 square feet. Duplexes and attached single-fami�ly uruts are perniitted conditionally. Some civic and institutional uses are also perniitted conditionally. APPLICABLE RE VIE W CRITERIA: Community Development Code Chapters 18330, 18.360, 18.390, 18.510, 18.705, 18.725, 18.745, 18,765, 18.775, 18.780, 18.790, 18.795 and 18.810. � DECISION MAKING BODY BELOW: ❑ TYPE I ❑ TYPE II � TYl'E III ❑ TYI'E IV COMMENTS WERE SENT: NOVEMBER 13,2007 COMMENTS ARE DLJE: NOVEMBER 27,2007 �HEARINGS OFFIC�R (MON.) DATE OF HEARING: DECEMBER 17,2007 TTME: 7:00 PM [PLANNING COMIVIISSION (MON.) DATE OF HEARING: TTME: 7:00 PM [QTY COUNQL (TLTES.) DATE OF HEARING: TTME: 7:30 PM [STAFF DEQSION (TENTATIVE) DATE OF DE��ION: COMPONENTS RELATED TO THE PROJECI'AVAILABLE FOR VIE WING IN THE PLANNING DIVISION �VIQI�IITY MAI' � DEMOLITTON PLAN � EXISTTNG CONDITTONS �SITE PLAN � TREE PLAN � IMI'ACT STCTDY �N�RRATTVE � GRADING PLAN � STORM H20 ANALYSIS STAFF CONTACT: Cheryl Caines,Assistant nlanner (503) 639-4171s extension 2437 � plannin� $YOUp_ _ _� G� ,JNIN,. �"?ANSPO�, raT;o^ 4N�. h� ��RO. , r ;:1i�pC�MF;' Transmittal Date: Thursday, September 6, 2007 To: Cheryl Caines, Assistant Planner From: Katie Prew City of Tigard, Community phone: 503 224-8225 Firm: Development, Planning Division � � Address: 13125 SW Hall Blvd. E-mail: kprew@angeloplanning.com Tigard, OR 97223 Phone: (503) 718-2437 RE: NF8�R Walnut Street Fire Station Cheryl, As requested, here are finro full-sized sets of prints for the proposed fire station on SW Walnut Street. Please let me know if there is anything else that you need. Thank you Katie Pre . ^` ��"'� �f +.°'��' Q 6 2007 CIT'�l n�= i?(�P,�D PLAf�NINGiF�'��r��ERWG 921 SW Washington Street,5uite 468,Portland,OR 97205 • tel 503.224.6974 • fax 503.227.3679 • www.angeloplanning.com �U�� (z - l,.�c I � ,��- 5�-f-�1�-;,,� LAND USE APPLIC.�tIOH D teect: , c��6��7- ��,� COMPLETENESS REVIEW ❑ COMPLETE ❑ INCOMPLETE STA ARD INFORMATION: DeedlTitle/Proof of Ownership [� Neighborhood Mtg.Affidavits, Minutes, List of Attendees [✓]� Impact Study(18.390) 0' USA Service Provider Letter ❑ Construction Cost Estimate ❑ Envelopes with Postage(Verify Count) ❑ #Sets Of Application MaterialslPlans-"Paper Copies" [t,]� Pre-Application Conference Notes ❑ #Sets Of Application Materials/Plans-"CD's" PROJECT STATISTICS: ❑ Building Footprint Size ❑ %of Landscaping On Site ❑ %of Building Impervious Surface On Site ❑ Lot Square Footage PLANS DIMENSIONED: 0 Building Footprint [� Parking Space Dimensions(inciude a,ccess�bie&sike Parkin9) ' [v]" Building Height [�]' Access Approach and Aisle [� Visual Clearance Triangle Shown ADDITIONAL PLANS: ❑ Vicinity Map [.]� Architectural Plan [� Tree Inventory [� Existing Conditions Plan [� Landscape Plan []v' Site Plan [� Lighting Plan TREE PLAN!MITIGATION PLA : I � i��.��i l 1 1 C C-'�,t I lL � ❑ D��ti�l� ' U'1 � FIi.T�-� V�l� Yl l�i�v l I I � /�'l�� '\!�"Tl l:.� ADDITIONAL REPORTS: (list any special reports) Q v��'1!J-�� 1'�. � � t� �,-�� _ IV�I ��t rc, I xZc'J��rr' C S �.12 S f .til n r ❑ _ Cxh�b� � T ' i.v<ts�e !+r_._I / ❑ RESPONSE TO APPLICABLE CODE SECTIONS: ❑ 18.330(Conditional Use) ❑ 15.630(Washington 5quare Regional Center) ❑ 18.775(Sensitive Lands Review� ❑ 18.340(Directors Interpretation) ❑ 18.705(AccesslEgress/CirculaUon) ❑ 18.780(Signs) ❑ 18.350(Planned Devebpment) ❑ 18.710(Accessory ResidenGal Units) ❑ 18.785(Temporary Use Permits) ❑ 18.360(Site Development Review) ❑ 18.715(Density Computations) ❑ 18.790(Tree Removal) ❑ 18.370(VananceslAdjustrnents) ❑ 18.720(Design Compatibility Standards) ❑ 18.795(Visual Clearance Areas) ❑ 1 a.380(Zoning MaplText Amendments) ❑ 18.725(Environmental Perfortnance Standards) ❑ 18.798(Wireless Communicafion Facilities) ❑ 18.390(Decisbn Making Procedures/Impact 5tudy) ❑ 18.730(Exceptions To Development Standards) ❑ 18.810(Street 8�Utility Improvement Standards) ❑ 18.410(Lot Line Adjustrnents) ❑ 18.740(Historic Overlay) ❑ 18.420(Land Partitions) ❑ 18.742(Home Occupation Permits) ❑ 18.430(Subdivisions) ❑ 18.745(Landscaping&Screening Standards) ❑ 18.510(ResidenBal Zoning DisUicts) ❑ 18.750(Manufactured/Mobil Home Regulations) ❑ 18.520(Commercial Zoning Districts) ❑ 18.755(Mixed Solid WastelRecycling Storage) ❑ 18.530(Industrial Zoning Districts) ❑ 18.760(Nonconforming Situations) ❑ 18,620(Tigard Triangle Design 5tandards) ❑ 18.765(Off-SVeet ParkinglLoading Requirements) ADDITIONAL ITEMS: I:lcurpin\masterslforms-revised\land use application completeness review.dot REVISED: 6-Jun-07 t . � CZty Of Tigard, Oregon 1312s SWHaII Blvd. • Tigara, JR 97223 �1 � :..f �:e . ,<< � ' i September 13, 2007 Gary Wells Director of Support Sen�ices Tualatin Valley Fire and Rescue 20665 SW Blanton St. Aloha, OR 97007 Dear Mr. Wells: RE: Notice of Incomplete Application Submittal—CUP2007-00003, SLR2007 00004 and VAR2007-00036 The City has not received the information necessary to begin the review of your Condirional Use Permit application. The development site is located at 12585 SW Walnut Street. This letter is to inform you that addirional materials will be needed in order to deem your application complete. The necessary materials are as follows: 1. Narrarive. Please revise and re-submit the following narrarive code secrions ♦ 18.390.050 — Impact Study. Summarize the impact to the storm water system and how that is mitigated. ♦ 18.705.030.K — Access, Egress, and Circularion. The narrarive states that all entrances will be two-way. The plans show access points that are 30 feet wide. The Traffic Impact Report states that the employee entrance will be entrance only and this is used as justification for the access adjustment. Please clarify whether the access will be one or two-way. ♦ 18.775.070.E.1-8 — Sensitive Lands. Please provide information on the measures taken to meet the criteria of this code section. Because land fortnalterations are not allowed within significant wedands, please revise the plans to remove the storm outfall from the wedand area. CWS regulates the vegetated corridor and therefote a revised outfall within the corridor may be allowed with CWS approval. ♦ 18.810. Please provide facts showing how the standards for streets, sidewalks, sanitary and storm are being met. If utilizing e�sting improvements, please show how these improvements continue to meet current standards. 2. Fee. Please include a sign permit fee ($40.00) for the monument sign. 3. The items in the enclosed public faciliry completeness checklist must be addressed. Any questions pertauung to public facilities can be directed to I{im McMillan at (503) 639- 4171 ext.2642. Phone: 503.639.4171 . Fax: 503.684.7297 . www.tigard-or.gov . TTY Relay: 503.684.2772 4. This is not a completeness item,but it may be addressed as a condition of approval. ♦ The proposed paYking lot trees are small in size and will not provide sufficient canopy. The City Arborist has recommended a larger species be used such as Zelkova, (Zelkova serrata), Lacebark Elm (Ulmus parvifolia), or American Ash (Fra�nus Amencana). If you have any quesrions about the above comments, please contact me at (503) 718-2437 or cherylc@tigard-or.gov. Sincerely, �� -�e,.��.,. C� .. �.�.,c..Y��..� Cheryl Caines Associate Planner c: CUP2007-00003 Land Use File Frank Angelo, Angelo Planning Group .v r� '� NI ..�� PUBLIC FACILITY PLAN Project: ✓F8R Walnut Station COMPLETENESS CHECKLIS� Date; 9/12/07 GRADING � Existin and proposed contours shown. � Are there radin impacts on ad'acent parcels? � Ad'acent arcel rades shown. ❑ Geotech stud submitted? N/A at this time. STREETISSUES � Ri ht-of-wa clearl shown. � Centerline of street s clearl shown. � Street name(s) shown. � Existin / ro osed curb or ed e of avement shown. � Street rofiles shown. ❑ Future Street Plan: Must show street profiles, topo N/A on ad�acent parcel(s), etc. � Traffic Impact and/or Access Re ort � Street rades com liant? � StreeUROW widths dimensioned and a pro riate? ❑ Private Streets? Less than 6 lots and width N/A appro riate? ❑ Other: Site Distance Please illustrate site distance in addition to the narrative descri tion alread rovided. SANITARY SEWER ISSUES � Existin /proposed lines shown. ❑ Stubs to ad�acent arcels re uired/shown? N/A WATER ISSUES � Existin / ro osed lines w/ sizes noted? � Existin /proposed fire h drants shown? � Pro osed meter location and size shown? � Proposed fire rotection s stem shown? STORM DRAINAGE AND WATER QUALITY ISSUES � Existin /proposed lines shown? � Preliminary sizing calcs for water quality/detention provided? � Water ualit /detention facilit shown on lans? � Area for facilit match requirements from calcs? � Facilit shown outside an wetland buffer? ❑ Storm stubs to ad�acent arcels re uired/shown? N/A The submittal is hereby deemed ❑ COMPLETE � INCOMPLETE By: "��` ' � �`�`"`"��`° ��--- Date: 9/13/07 l�i,w�., -�ti��t�_ i.Ll.[�c��--�✓ REVISED: 09/13/07 _ . ��t��p �;t 0 4 2007 �{ O ,. ; - ��;{'�i��". plannin� Xroup LAND USE PLANNING • TRANSPORTATION �LA?N1�11'NG;�h�A��J,EF�T MANAGEMENT � V Memorandum Date: October 3, 2007 To: Cheryl Caines,Associate Planner From: Katie Prew,Angelo Planning Group � Re: Response to Completeness Review—CUP2007-00003, SLR2007-00004 and VAR2007- 00036 I appre��ate yaur ca�tinued ass�stanc� on this important pro�ect. I vis�ted your office te�ay ard �ither replaced sections or added pages to the original application binders that will provide you with the information necessary to address the items identified by City staff in the Completeness Review letter dated September 13, 2007. The sections that were replaced are: o Section 2: Application Narrative, pages: ■ 2-16 through 2-17; • 2-24; ■ 2-52 through 2-53; and ■ 2063 through 2-71. o Section 3: Exhibits: ■ Exhibit E, Civil Engineering Drawings, C0.0 through C2.2, and ■ Exhibit E, Landscape Plan, L1.0 The section that was added is: o Section 3: Exhibits: ■ Exhibit F, Traffic Impact Analysis and Adjustment Memorandum, and ■ Exhibit K, PBS Engineering and Environmental Street Standards Memorandum. This memorandum provides a brief summary of how each item was addressed and where the additional information can be found in the revised application submittal. 1. Narrative. 0 18.390.050— Impact Study. The narrative text on page 2-16 has been updated to include a statement regarding the impact to the storm water system. 0 18.705.030.K — Access, Egress, and Circulation. The narrative text on page 2-24 has been corrected to reflect information presented in the Traffic Impact Analysis. 0 18.775.070.E.1-8 — Sensitive Lands. As requested, the storm outfall has been removed from the wetland area and the new storm water information has been illustrated on the new Civil Engineering plans in Exhibit E. Additionally, the narrative text on pages 2-52 and 2-53 has been updated as necessary. An updated Clean Water Services (CWS) 921 SW Washington Street,Suite 468, Portland,OR 97205 • tel 503.224.6974 • fax 503.227.3679 • www.angeloplanning.com October 3,2007 Memorandum 2 approval has been submitted for and approval is expected in mid-October. An updated CWS provider letter will be submitted to the City as soon as it is available. 0 18.810. A memorandum from PBS Engineering and Environmental which details the standards for streets, sidewalk, sanitary and storm and how they are being met by this project has been added to the submittal as Exhibit K. The narrative text for Chapter 18.810 — Street Utility Improvement Standards, on pages 2-63 through 2-71, has been updated as necessary. 2. Fee. The sign permit fee ($40.00) has been submitted with this memorandum. 3. Public Facilitv Plan Completeness Checklist. The site distance has been illustrated as requested and inserted into Exhibit F. 4. As shown on the attached updated Landscape Plan (Sheet L1.0, Exhibit E) the parking lot trees have been revised as recommended and now are Zelkova Serrate"Green Vase"trees. Please feel free to contact me if you have any questions or comments. I can be reached by telephone at(503) 224-8225 or by email at kprew@angeloplanning.com. CZty Of Tigard, Oregon 13125 SW Hall Blvd. • Tigard 'Z 97223 �� ' ` ! October 23, 2007 Gary Wells Director of Support Services Tualatin Valley Fire and Rescue 20665 SW Blanton St. Aloha, OR 97007 Dear Mr. `�Uells: RE: Notice of Incomplete Application Submittal— CUP2007-00003, SLR2007-00004 and VAR2007-00036 The City has not received the information necessary to begin the review of your Condiuonal Use Permit application. The development site is located at 12585 SW Walnut Street. This letter is to inform you that additional materials will be needed in order to deem your application complete. The necessary materials are as follow�s: 1. The items in the enclosed public facility completeness checklist must be addressed. Any questions pertaining to public facilities can be directed to Kim McMillan at (503) 639-4171 ext.2642. If you have any questions about the above comments, please contact me at (503) 718-2437 or cherylc@tigard-or.gov. Sincerely, ., ' � � �� • CL-��-�� Cheryl Caines Associate Planner c: CUP2007-00003 Land Use File Frank Angelo, Angelo Planning Group Phone: 503.639.4171 . Fax: 503.684.7297 . www.tigard-or.gov • TTY Relay: 503.684.2772 �— �PUBLIC FACILITY PLAN Project: F8R Walnut Stafion COMPLETENESS CHECKLIST Date: 9/12/07 GRADING � Existin and ro osed contours shown. � Are there radin im acts on ad�acent arcels? � Ad�acent arcel rades shown. ❑ Geotech stud submitted? N/A at this time. STREETISSUES � Ri ht-of-wa clearl shown. � Centerline of street s clearl shown. � Street name s shown. � Existin / ro osed curb or ed e of avement shown. � Street rofiles shown. ❑ Future Street Plan: Must show street profiles, topo N/A on ad�acent arcel s , etc. � Traffic Im act and/or Access Re ort � Street rades com liant? � StreeUROW widths dimensioned and a ro riate? ❑ Private Streets? Less than 6 lots and width N/A ro riate?—�~�. ❑ Other: Site Distance P/ease illustrate site distance in addition to — cL the narrative descri tion alread rovided. �� SANITARY SEWER ISSUES � Existin / ro osed lines shown. ❑ Stubs to ad'acent arcels re uired/shown? N/A WATER ISSUES �^, � Existin / ro osed lines w/ sizes noted? � Existin / ro osed fire h drants shown? � Pro osed meter location and size shown? � Pro osed fire rotection s stem shown? STORM DRAINAGE AND WATER QUALITY ISSUES � Existin / ro osed lines shown? � Preliminary sizing calcs for water quality/detention rovided? � Water ualit /detention facilit shown on lans? � Area for facilit match re uirements from calcs? � Facilit shown outside an wetland buffer? ❑ Storm stubs to ad�acent arcels re uired/shown? N/A The submittal is hereby deemed ❑ COMPLETE ' � INCOMPLETE I%/p l .-C�k �-_ By: ��. ' �'`�,c�-�;`� - .��t--- Date: 9/13/07 ,�- ��,wJ �y�� REVISED: 09/13/07 �heryl Caines -TVF&R Page 1 I From: Kim Mcmillan To: Cheryl Caines Date: 10/23/2007 1:53:51 PM Subject: NF&R Cheryl, I spoke to Gus about the application and we consider it incomplete with regards to sight distance. The applicanYs engineer needs to provide more information. The sight distance issue has been of concern from the beginning and remains our biggest engineering and safety concern with regards to this development. The applicanYs engineer has pointed out that they cannot meet the required sight distance of 440 feet at the west access. The 390 feet of sight distance shown on Figure 7 includes an obstruction (a shed). As part of the list of mitigation items they should have included the removal or relocation of the shed. This will require working with the adjacent property owner. It is not adequate for the engineer to expect the City to increase speed limit enforcement so they can achieve sight distance. It is also not appropriate for the applicant to propose they work with the City to reduce the 85th percentile speed to 35 mph, which happens to coincide with their available 390 feet of sight distance (after removal of the shed)without first proposing any viable options. Before proceeding with a land use application that we deem complete the engineer needs to provide a detailed list of improvements necessary to produce adequate sight distance. Kim CC: Dick Bewersdorff; Gus Duenas; Tom Coffee City of Tigard, Oregon � 13125 SW Hall Blvd. • Tigara, vR 97223 �1 . . October 29, 2007 � � / Gary Wells Director of Support Services Tualatin Valley Fire and Rescue 20665 SW Blanton St. Aloha, OR 97007 Dear Mr. Wells: RE: Notice of Incomplete A�plication Submittal—CUP2007-00003, SLR2007-00004, & VAR2007-00036 The City has reviewed your application for completeness and found that all issues have been addressed. Please note however that the information provided on site distance may not be adequate to make recommendations of approval. The application will be deemed complete once the following additional items are submttted. Please feel free to take this opportunity to revise the site distance certification to show how the standard will be met. • Submit 10 copies of complete application packets. This includes plans and all application materials that have been submitted to the City. If items are being revised prior to this re-submittal, please include 3 additional copies for the packets already on-file. ♦ Submit 9 additional copies of plan sets. These may be reduced copies provided they are legible. One set must be 8.5" x 11". ♦ Submit 1 compact disc with all materials in a searchable format (PDF for example). • Submit two sets of pre-stamped, pre-addressed envelopes. Properry owner list must be produced by Patty Lunsfard in the Planning Department, 503-639-4171, ext. 2438. If you have any questions about the above comments, please contact me at (503) 718-2437 or cherylc@tigard-or.gov. Sincerely, ��u-�-- ��..�� Cheryl Caines Associate Planner c: CUP2007-00003 Land Use File Frank Angelo,Angelo Planning Group Phone: 503.639.4171 . Fax: 503.684.7297 . www.tigard-or.gov . 7"TY Relay: 503.684.2772 0 plannin� �YOUp LAND USE PLANNING • TRANSPORTATION PLANNING • PROJECT MANAGEMENT V � Memorandum �� Date: November 1, 2007 To: Cheryl Caines, Associate Planner �� ' Z�07 .-.F ._ . From: Katie Prew, Angelo Planning Group /� �� Re: Response to Notice of Incomplete Application Submittal—CUP2007-00003, SLR2007- 00004 and VAR2007-00036 I appreciate your continued assistance on this important project and in helping us to reach completeness. I visited your office today and added the amended Clean Water Services provider letter to the original application binders. The addition of this amended provider letter fulfills the last of the items requested on the original incomplete letter dated September 13, 2007. The amended letter has been added to the beginning of Exhibit B, Clean Water Services Required Documentation. In addition to the updated Clean Water Services information, I have also submitted the items that were requested on the incomplete letter dated October 29,2007, as detailed below: o Ten copies of the complete application packet. These binders include all information that has been submitted to date as well as full-sized plan sets. o Nine additional copies of the plan set. As requested, one of these copies is 8.5 x 11". o One compact disc with all materials in a searchable format. This disc contains the entire binder, as submitted, in PDF format. o Two sets of pre-stamped, pre-addressed envelopes. These envelopes have been addressed with the labels provided by the Ciry of Tigard and have also been pre-stamped. Please feel free to contact me 'rf you have a�y questions or comments. ! can be reached by telephone at(503) 224-8225 or by email at kprew@angeloplanning.com. 921 SW Washington Street,Suite 468, Portland,OR 97205 • tel 503.224.6974 • fax 503.227.3679 • www.angeloplanning.com City of Tigard, Oregon . 13125 SW Hall Blvd. � Tigarct, _,_2 97223 �� . ': � E , November 6, 2007 Gary Wells , Director of Support Services Tualatin Valley Fire and Rescue 20665 SW Blanton St. Aloha, (�R 97�f17 RE: Completeness Review—Tualatin Valley Fire & Rescue,Walnut Station Case File Nos. CUP2007-00003,SLR2007-00004,&VAR2007-00036 Dear Mr. Wells: The City received your supplemental application materials on November 1, 2007 for Conditional Use Approval (CUP2007-00003) to construct a new fire station with a communiry room on Walnut Street. Staff has completed review of the revised submittal materials and has determu7ed that the application is complete. For the purposes of the State mandated 120-day review period, a final decision including any local appeals must be made by February 29, 2008. A hearing with the Hearings Officer has been scheduled for December 17, 2007. It should be noted that staff has not reviewed the application submittal for compliance with the relevant code criteria, and that additional items may arise during the application review which may require further clarification. If you have any questions regarding this letter or your application,please contact me at (503) 718-2437. Sincerely, �lk'.C� �(2(�-�'u'..J Cheryl Caines Associate Planner cc: CUP2007-00002 Land Use File Sharon Maroney, The Broadway Rose Theatre Co. ,� Phone: 503.639.4171 . Fax: 503.684.7297 . www.tigard-or.gov . TTY Relay: 503.684.2772 i � � '� LETTER OF TRANSMITTAL � FOR COMPLETENESS � � � PLANNING/ENGINEERING DIVISIONS __ _ -- - _ � When submitting documents to complet a , DATE STAMP: �- 1 land use application, the Applicant shal provide a copy of the Incompleteness L tter and the Public Facility Completeness �-- Checklist along with materials addressi g � all of the elements listed. DO NOT SUBMIT ITE MS FOR COMPL TE NE SS UNTIL ALL REQLJIRED ITEMS CAN BE UBMI?TED AT ONE TIME. . \ TO: �'��u� \ - FROM: � PHONE NUMBER �5p�� a�-Baz� RE: �,��GY�� 'BQ�D,�. „�,��-Oo��' �'�''z��Da�c�d (Case number and project name must be included) COMMENTS: � �t,cdsy%�a� . U �-�ylQ�7�d� ��r�� Tualatin Valley Fire & Rescue Walnut Street Fire Station Conditional Use Application Sensitive Lands Review Adjustment to Access and Egress Standards Sign Permit Submitted to City of Tigard Current Planning Division August 14, 2007 Revised �,.� Development Application Summary Information for Tualatin Valley Fire 8� Rescue Walnut Street Fire Station Applicant: Gary Wells Director of Support Services Tualatin Valley Fire & Rescue 20665 SW Blanton Street Aloha, Oregon 97007 Phone: (503) 642-0331 Phone Fax: (503) 642-9655 Fax e-mail: gary.wells@tvfr.com Applicant's Representative: Frank Angelo Angelo Planning Group 921 SW Washington Street, Suite 468 Portland, OR 97205-3026 Phone: (503) 227-3664 Fax: (503) 227-3679 e-mail: fangelo@angelo.com Legal Description: 2S104AD04500 (Also see Exhibit A) Current Plan Designation: Residential Current Zoning: Low-Density Residential District (R-4.5) Applications Submitted for: Conditional Use Sensitive Lands Review Adjustment Project Statistics: 12,693 Building Footprint Size 15.5 % of Landscaping On Site 30.3 % of Building Impervious Surface On Site 142,231 Lot Square Footage Design Team for Tualatin Valley Fire � Rescue Walnut Street Fire Station Land Use Planners: Angelo Planning Group 921 SW Washington Street, Suite 468 Portland, Oregon 97205 Phone: (503) 224-6974 Architects: Peck Smiley Ettlin Architects 4412 SW Corbett Portland, Oregon 97201 Phone: (503) 248-9170 Civil Engineering and PBS Engineering and Environmental Environmental Evaluation: 4412 SW Corbett Portland, Oregon 97201 Phone: (503) 248-1939 Traffic Analysis: DKS Associates 1400 SW 5th Ave # 500 Portland, OR 97201 Phone: (503) 243-3500 Landscape Architect: Otten Landscape Architects, Inc. 3933 SW Kelly Street Suite B Portland, Oregon 97239 Phone: (503) 972-0311 Arborist: Tree Care 8� Landscapes Unlimited, Ltd. PO Box 1566 Lake Oswego, Oregon 97035 Phone: (503) 635-3165 TABLE OF CONTENTS Tualatin Valley Fire & Rescue Walnut Street Fire Station Application Form Section 1:General Information ProjectDescription .........................................................................................................1-1 Siteand Context.............................................................................................................1-1 Overview of the City of Tigard Combined Application ....................................................1-1 Section 2:Application Narrative Chapter 18.330 — Conditional Use Application...............................................................2-1 Chapter 18.360— Site Development Review..................................................................2-6 Chapter 18.370 —Variances and Adjustments.............................................................2-13 Chapter 18.390 — Decision-Making Procedures...........................................................2-15 Chapter 18.510 — Residential Zoning Districts.............................................................2-18 Chapter 18.705—Access, Egress, and Circulation......................................................2-20 Chapter 18.725 — Environmental Performance Standards...........................................2-25 Chapter 18.730 — Exceptions to Development Standards............................................2-27 Chapter 18.745— Landscaping and Screening ............................................................2-28 Chapter 18.755 — Mixed Solid Waste and Recyclable Storage....................................2-38 Chapter 18.765 — Off-Street Parking and Loading Requirements................................2-42 Chapter 18.775 — Sensitive Lands ...............................................................................2-50 Chapter18.780 — Signs................................................................................................2-55 Chapter 18.790 —Tree Removal..................................................................................2-58 Chapter 18.795 —Visual Clearance Areas...................................................................2-61 Chapter 18.810— Street and Utility Improvement Standards.......................................2-63 Section 3:Exhibits A. Proof of Ownership and Legal Description B. Clean Water Services Required Documentation C. Pre-Application Conference Notes D. Neighborhood Meeting Materials E. Plan Set • Site Plan and Details o Grading/Erosion Control Plan • Floor Plans and Architectural o Erosion Control Details Elevations o Stormwater Details • Civil Engineering Drawings: o Water Details o Cover Sheet and Vicinity Map • Landscape Plan o Existing Conditions • Lighting Plan and Cut Sheets o Utility Plan o Stormwater Plan F. Traffic Impact Analysis, Adjustment Memorandum and Site Distance Illustration G. Arborist Report; Tree Inventory and Tree Plan H. Storm Drainage Report I. Waste Hauler Approval J. Natural Resource Assessment Report K. PBS Engineering and Environmental Street Standards Memorandum iii TABLE OF CONTENTS Tualatin Valley Fire & Rescue Walnut Street Fire Station List of Figures Figure1-1. Vicinity Map..................................................................................................1-3 List of Tables Table2-1. Plan Set........................................................................................... 2-4 and 2-8 Table 2-2. Conditional Use Decision-making Procedure..............................................2-15 Table 2-3. Development Standards..............................................................................2-19 Table 2-4. Vehicular Access/Egress Requirements.....................................................2-24 Table 2-5. Proposed Vehicular Access/Egress............................................................2-24 Table 2-6. Buffering Combinations for Landscaping and Screening ............................2-32 Table 2-7. Proposed Buffering Combination for Landscaping and Screening..............2-33 Table 2-8. Off-Street SurFace Parking Standards.........................................................2-46 Table 2-9. Required Off-Street Vehicle and Bicycle Parking Spaces...........................2-49 iv Application Form Tualatin Valley Fire & Rescue Walnut Street Fire Station � • �o e� c� r r�, � �le� Section 1: General Information Tualatin Valley Fire & Rescue Walnut Street Fire Station Proiect Description Tualatin Valley Fire & Rescue is seeking Conditional Use and Sensitive Land approval along with an Adjustment for driveway spacing, from the City of Tigard to construct a new fire station. The fire station will be 11,882 square feet and will include a three-bay parking area for fire apparatus; dorm space for the fire fighters and a community room which will be available to the public. Figure 1-1 on page 1-3 shows the location of the proposed fire station. The station has been designed to fit in the southwest corner of the site, avoiding the sensitive areas around Krueger Creek. Surface parking has been included to accommodate both employee parking and parking for the proposed community room. Site and Context The proposed location for the fire station is 12585 SW Walnut Street (2S104AD04500) in a residential neighborhood. The fire station and main access points onto the site are oriented toward SW Watnut Street. The areas surrounding the fire station site are residentially, however, directly to the north of the site is Jack Park, a small neighborhood park. Overview of the Citv of Tiqard Combined Application This application demonstrates how the TVF8�R Walnut Street Fire Station Project complies with the requirements of the City of Tigard's Community Development Code. The fire station is a Conditional Use within a residential district and, because of the wetlands on site, is considered a Sensitive Lands site. As such both a Conditional Use and Sensitive Lands application is required. Additionally, due to the spacing of the driveways on site, a variance to the access and egress standards is required. This application is organized in the following manner: Section 1 — Introduction and Project Overview ■ Provides a description of the TVF&R Walnut Street Fire Station project, a brief description of the site and context and an overview of the application format. Section 2 —Applicable Review Criteria ■ Conformance with Land Use Decisions Describes how the project to construct the fire station complies with the standards of Chapter 18.300, Land Use Decisions, in the Tigard Community Development Code including 18.330 Conditional Use Application; 18.360 Site Development Review; 18.370 Variances and Adjustments and 18.390 Decision-Making Procedures. ■ Conformance with Residential Zoning Criteria Describes how the project to construct the fire station complies with the standards of Chapter 18.510, Residential Zoning Districts, in the Tigard Community Development Code. ■ Conformance with Specific Development Standards Includes responses to applicable sections of Chapter 18.700 Specific Development Standards including 18.705 Access, Egress, and Circulation; 18.745 Landscaping and Screening and 18.775 Sensitive Lands. • Conformance with Street and Utility Improvement Standards Describes how the project to construct the fire station complies with the standards of Chapter 18.810, Street and Utility Improvements Standards, of the Tigard Community Development Code. Section 1: General Information �-� Tualatin Valley Fire& Rescue Walnut Street Fire Station August 14, 2007 Exhibits ■ Exhibit A is the required proof of ownership and legal description ■ Exhibit B is the required documentation from Clean Water Services ■ Exhibit C is the Pre-Application Conference Notes from the February 8, 2007 meeting. • Exhibit D contains the required Neighborhood Meeting documentation. ■ Exhibit E contains the required plans for this development application. • Exhibit F is the Traffic Impact Analysis and Memorandum detailing the requested Adjustment to the Access and Egress Standards. � Exhibit G is the Arborist Report including the Tree Inventory and Tree Plan. ■ Exhibit H is the Storm Drainage Report. • Exhibit I is the required approval from the Waste Hauler. � Exhibit J is the Natural Resource Assessment Report which includes the Delineation Report Section 1: General Information �"2 Tualatin Valley Fire 8�Rescue Walnut Street Fire Station August 14,2007 Figure 1-1. Vicinity Map. Tualatin VaJley Fire 8 Rescue Walnut Street Fire Statlon Vicinity Map � � T�� I I I \ - � � � - _ _ I --- � - � I , �- � I +I I �. � �z59s sw wa�nut street � I� (zS10aAD0a500) � � �♦� BikewHy(bike lane) � I � Bus etop I p T__ N 1-3 Section 1: General Information August 14,2007 Tualatin Valley Fire&Rescue Walnut Street Fire Station �..�._..._., i Section 2: Application Narrative Tualatin Valley Fire & Rescue Walnut Street Fire Station Chapter 18.330 CONDITIONAL USE 18.330.010 Purpose A. Purpose. The purpose of this chapter is to provide standards and procedures under which a conditional use may be permitted, enlarged or altered if the site is appropriate and if other appropriate conditions of approval can be met. There are certain uses which due to fhe nature of the impacts on surrounding land uses and public facilities require a case-by-case review and analysis. Response: The applicant, Tualatin Valley Fire and Rescue, is applying for Conditional Use approval to construct a new fire station at 12585 SW Walnut Street in Tigard. The applicant is aware that the applicable standards and procedures in this chapter must be met and followed for the application to be approved. 18.330.020 Approval Process A. Initial applicafions. A request for approval for a new conditional use shall be processed as a Type lll- HO procedure, as regulated by Chapter 18.390.050, using approval criteria contained in Section 98.330.030A and subject to other requirements in this chapter. Response: The proposed development, a new fire station at 12585 SW Walnut Street, is an initial application for a new conditional use. The applicant understands that it is a Type III-HO procedure and as such is regulated by Chapter 18.390.050 of the Tigard Development Code (TDC) and will need to meet the approval criteria contained in Section 18.330.030A and any applicable requirements within this chapter. 18.330.030 Approval Standards and Conditions of Approval A. Approva! standards. The Hearings Officer shal! approve, approve with condifions, or deny an application for a conditional use or to enlarge or alfer a conditiona! use based on findings of fact with respect to each of the following criteria: 1. The site size and dimensions provide adequafe area for the needs of the proposed use; Response: The site proposed for development is at 12585 SW Walnut Street (2S104AD04500) and is approximately 3.3 acres. The proposed fire station will be 11,882 square feet in size and situated in the southeast corner of the parcel. The fire station, along with the associated parking lot, will cover approximately 43,163 square feet (approximately 30 percent) of the total site. 2. The impacts of the proposed use of the site can be accommodated considering size, shape, location, fopography, and natural features; Response: The impacts of the proposed development can be accommodated within the proposed site. As previously stated, the fire station will take up only about 30 percent of the total site acreage. Additionally, the fire station and associated parking area have been designed in terms of both shape and size to fit into the southeast corner of the site. This placement will ensure that there will be no impact to the sensitive natural features and topography on site but will allow for ample room to meet the applicable development standards. 3. All required public facilities have adequate capacity fo serve the proposal; Response: The following public facilities have been reviewed for adequate capacity to serve the proposal: Section 2:Application Narrative 2-� Tualatin Valley Fire 8�Rescue Walnut Street Fire Station August 14,2007 • Streets: SW Walnut Street was recently improved to the applicable City of Tigard standards through a Washington County project which are discussed further in this development application (see page 63). • Utility Lines: Utility lines have previously been underground on site and will be available to serve the proposed development. • Sanitary Sewers and Water Supply: The applicant will extend that sewer line and water supply currently in SW Walnut Street to serve the proposed development. . Fire Protection: Tualatin Valley Fire 8� Rescue has had the opportunity to review the pre- application plans for the proposed station and at the time did not have any comments. • Storm Sewer and Storm Water Quality: An on-site detention and water quality facility has been designed for the site. Specifics regarding the design of this facility, including the necessary calculations, have been submitted with this development application as Exhibit A. • Schools: The proposed development is not a residential development and therefore will not have any impact on the school system. 4. The applicable requirements of the zoning district are met except as modified by this chapter, Response: As shown on pages 2-18 through 2-19 of this development application, the proposed development meets the requirements of the underlying zoning district except as the requirements have been modified by section 18.330.050.6.16.a-e of this chapter. 5. The applicable requirements of 18.330.050; and Response: As detailed in the responses to section 18.330.050.6.16.a-e, the proposed development will meet the applicable requirements. 6. The supplementary requiremenfs set forth in other chapters of this code including buf not limited to Chapter 98.780, Signs, and Chapter 18.360, Site Development Review, if applicable, are met. Response: Per the Pre-Application Conference Notes, the applicable chapters of the TDC are: • Chapter 18.510 Residential Zoning District • Chapter 18.330 Conditional Use • Chapter 18.390 Decision-Making Procedures • Chapter 18.705 Access, Egress, and Circulation • Chapter 18.725 Environmental Performance Standards • Chapter 18.730 Exceptions to Development Standards • Chapter 18.745 Landscaping and Screening • Chapter 18.755 Mixed Solid Waster and Recyclable Storage • Chapter 18.765 Off-Street Parking and Loading Requirements • Chapter 18.775 Sensitive Lands • Chapter 18.780 Signs • Chapter 18.790 Tree Removal • Chapter 18.795 Visual Clearance Areas • Chapter 18.810 Street and Utility Improvement Standards Each of those code chapters will be addressed in this application narrative and all applicable criteria will be met. B. Conditions of approval. The Hearings Officer may impose conditions on the approval of a conditional use, which are found necessary to ensure the use is compatible with other use in the vicinity, and that the impact of the proposed use on the surrounding uses and public facilities is minimized. These conditions may include, buf are not limited to the following: Section 2:Application Narrative 2-2 Tualatin Valley Fire 8�Rescue Walnut Street Fire Station August 14, 2007 1. Limiting fhe hours, days, place and/or manner of operation; 2. Requiring design features which minimize environmental impacts such as noise, vibration, air pollution, glare, odor and/or dust; 3. Requiring additional setback areas, fot area, and/or!ot depth or width; 4. Limiting the building height, size or lot coverage, and/or location on the site; 5. Designating the size, number, location and/or design of vehicle access points; 6. Requiring street right-of-way to be dedicated and street(s) to be improved; 7. Requiring landscaping, screening, drainage and/or surfacing of parking and loading areas; 8. Limiting the number, size, location, height and/or lighting of signs; 9. Lrmiting or setting standards for the location and/or intensity of outdoor lighting; 90. Requiring berms, screening or landscaping and the establishment of standards for their installation and maintenance; 11. Requiring and designating the size, height, location and/or materials for fences; 12. Requiring fhe protection and preservafion of existing trees, soils, vegefation, watercourses, habifat areas and/or drainage areas; 13. Requiring the dedication of sufficient open land area for a greenway adjoining and within the floodplain when land form alterations and development are allowed within the 100-year floodplain; and 14. Requiring the construction of a pedestrian/bicycle pathway within the floodplain in accordance with the adopted pedestrian/bicycle pathway plan. Response: The applicant understands that the Hearings Officer may find it necessary to impose conditions on the approval of a conditional use to ensure the use is compatible with other use in the vicinity, and that the impact of the proposed use on the surrounding uses and public facilities is minimized. These conditions may include, but are not limited to items numbered 1 through 13 in TDC section 18.330.030.6. C. Exemptions. Manufactured home parks and manufactured home subdivisions are exempt... Response: The proposed development does not include either a manufactured home park or subdivision and therefore this criterion is not applicable. 18.330.040 Additional Submission Requirements A. Additional submission requirements. In addition to the submission requirements required in Chapter 18.390, Decision-Making Procedures, an application for conditiona! use approval must include the foNowing additional information in graphic, tabular and/or narrative form. The Direcfor shall provide a list of the specific information to be included in each of the following: 9. Exisfing sife conditions; Section 2:Application Narrative 2-3 Tualatin Valley Fire& Rescue Walnut Street Fire Station August 14, 2007 2. A site plan; 3. A grading plan; 4. A landscape plan; 5. Architectural elevations of all structures; and 6. A copy of all existing and proposed restrictions or covenants. Response: The items required as additional submission requirements can be within this development application submission as follows: Table 2-1. Plan Set Additional Submission Re uirements Provided As Existin Site Conditions C0.1, Exhibit E Site Plan A1.1, Exhibit E Gradin Plan C1.2, Exhibit E Landsca e Plan L1.0, Exhibit E Architectural Elevations A3.1, Exhibit E Pro osed Restrictions or Covenants N/A 18.330.050 Additional Development Standards for Conditional Use Types A. Concurrent variance application(s). A conditional use permrt shall not grant variances fo fhe regulations otherwise prescribed by this title. A variance application(s) may be filed in conjunction wifh the conditional use application and both appJications may be heard at the same hearing. Response: An Adjustment application has been filed in conjunction with this conditional use application. B. Additional development standards. The additiona! dimensional requirements and approval standards for conditional use are as follows: 16. Emergency Services and Basic Utilities: a. Minimum lot size shall be 5,000 square feet; b. Minimum setbacks shall be those in the applicable zone; c. Height limitation sha!!be in accordance with Chapter 18.730; d. Off-street parking and loading requirement shall be in accordance with Chapter 18.765; and e. Screening shal!be in accordance with Chapter 18.745. Response: Each of the additional development standards listed above has been addressed as follows: • The lot size is approximately 3.3 acres (roughly 215,622 square feet) which meets the minimum lot size requirement. • As shown on page 2-19, the proposed development meets the minimum setbacks of the underlying zone. Section 2:Application Narrative 2"4 Tualatin Valley Fire& Rescue Walnut 5treet Fire Station August 14, 2007 • The height limitation requirements within Chapter 18.730 have been addressed on page 2-27 of this application. • The off-street parking proposed for the development has been designed in accordance with Chapter 18.765 of the TDC as discussed on pages 2-42 through 2-49 of this application. There are no applicable loading requirements associated with the proposed development. • The screening proposed for the development has been designed in accordance with Chapter 18.745 of the TDC as discussed on pages 2-28 through 2-37 of this application. Section 2:Application Narrative 2'S Tualatin Valley Fire&Rescue Walnut Street Fire Station August 14, 2007 � Chapter 18.360 SITE DEVELOPMENT REVIEW 18.360.010 Purpose A. Promote general welfare. The purpose and intent of site development review is to promote the general welfare by directing attention to site planning, and giving regard to the natural environment and the elements of creative design to assist in conserving and enhancing the appearance of the City. Response: The applicant, Tualatin Valley Fire and Rescue, understands that the purpose and intent of site development review is to promote the City's general welfare by directing attention to site planning, and giving regard to the natural environment and the elements of creative design to assist in conserving and enhancing the appearance of the City and will meet those goals through this application. 8. Genera! purposes. It is in the public interest and necessary for the promotion of fhe health, safety and welfare, convenience, comfort and prosperity of the citizens of the City of Tigard.� 1. To implement the City of Tigard's Comprehensive Plan and other approval standards in this title; 2. To preserve and enhance the natural beauties of the land and of the man-made environment, and enjoyment thereof; 3. To maintain and improve the qualities of and relationships between individual buildings, structures and the physical developments which best contribute to the amenities and attractiveness of an area or neighborhood; 4. To protect and ensure the adequacy and usefulness of public and private developments as they relate to each other and to the neighborhood or area; and 5. To ensure thaf each individual development provides for a quality environment for the cifizens utilizing that development as well as the communify as a whole. Response: In designing this project, the applicant has balanced objectives to achieve proper functioning of the various site components, establish and maintain a high visual environment, reflect a need for consistency with the design of neighboring developments, and recognize the need to manage overall adequacy and usefulness. Therefore, the plans and proposed improvements are consistent with these stated purposes and objectives of site development review. C. Environmental enhancement. To prevent the erosion of natural beauty, the lessening of environmental amenities, the dissipafion of both usefulness and function, and to encourage additional landscaping, it is necessary: 1. To stimulate harmonious design for individua! buildings, groups of buildings and structures, and other physica!developments; 2. To encourage the innovative use of materials, mefhods and techniques and flexibility in building placemenf; and 3. To integrate the function, appearance and location of buildings and improvements so as to best achieve a balance between private prerogatives and preferences, and the public interest and welfare. Section 2:Application Narrative 2-6 Tualatin Valley Fire&Rescue Walnut Street Fire Station August 14, 2007 Response: The applicant recognizes the importance of protecting and enhancing the environment. The site has been designed to comply with all applicable code requirements including those that encourage landscaping, innovative use of materials and integrate function, appearance and location of buildings and improvements so as to best achieve a balance between private prerogatives and preferences, and the public interest and welfare. 18.360.020 Applicability of Provisions A. Applicability and exemptions.... Response: Per TDC section 18.330.030.A.6 and discussions with Tigard Staff, while it is necessary for a Conditional Use application to meet the Site Development criteria, a Site Development application is not required for this project. 18.360.040 Bonding and Assurances A. Performance bonds for public improvements. On al! projects where public improvements are required the Direcfor shall require a bond in an amount not greater fhan 100% or other adequate assurances as a condition of approva! of the site development plan in order to ensure the completed projeci is in conformance with the approved plan; and Response: The applicant understands that where pubic improvements are made the Director may require a bond or other adequate assurances as a condition of approval of the site plan in order to ensure the completed project is in conformance with the approved plan. 8. Release of performance bonds. The bond sha!! be released when the Director finds the completed project conforms to the approved sife development plan and all conditions of approval are satisfied. Response: The applicant understands that the performance bond, if required, will be released when the Director finds the completed project conforms to the approved site plan and all conditions of approval are satisfied. C. Complefion of landscape installation. Landscaping shal! be insta!!ed prior to issuance of occupancy permits, unless security equal fo the cost of the landscaping as determined by the Director is filed with the City Recorder assuring such installation within six months after occupancy: 1. Security may consist of a faithful performance bond payab/e to the City, cash, certified check or such other assurance of completion approved by the City Attorney; and 2. If the insta!lation of the landscaping is not complefed wifhin the six-month period, the security may be used by the Cify to complete the insta!lafion. Response: The landscaping will be installed prior to issuance of the occupancy permit. 18.360.070 Submission Requirements A. General submission requirements. The applicant shal/ submit an application containing all of the general informafion required for a Type ll procedure, as governed by Section 18.390.040. 6. Additional information. !n addifion to the submission requirements required in Chapter 18.390, Decision-Making Procedures, an application for the conceptual development plan musf include the following additiona!information in graphic, tabular and/or narrative form. The Director shall provide a list of the speci�c information to be included in each of the following: Section 2:Application Narrative 2-� Tualatin Valley Fire& Rescue Walnut Street Fire Station August 14, 2007 1. An existing site condifions analysis; 2. A site plan; 3. A grading plan; 4. A landscape plan; 5. Architecfura!elevations of all structures; and 6. A copy of all existing and proposed restrictions or covenants. Response: As required, all necessary plans and architectural elevations have been attached (Exhibit E). There are no existing or proposed restrictions or covenants as part of this development and, therefore, number six above will not be part of the exhibits listed below. Table 2-1. Plan Set (Duplicated) Additional Submission Re uirements Provided As Existin Site Conditions C0.1, Exhibit E Site Plan A1.1, Exhibit E Gradin Plan C1.2, Exhibit E Landsca e Plan L1.0, Exhibit E Architectural Elevations A3.1, Exhibit E Pro osed Restrictions or Covenants N/A 18.360.090 Approval Criteria A. Approval criteria. The Director shall make a finding with respect to each of the foNowing criteria when approving, approving with conditions, or denying an applicafion: 1. Compliance with all of the applicable requirements of this title including Chapfer 18.810, Street and Utility Standards; Response: As shown addressed starting on page 2-63 of this application, all applicable requirements of Chapter 18.810 and Title 18 have been met. 2. Relationship to the natural and physical environment: a. Buildings shall be: (1) Located to preserve existing trees, topography and natural drainage where possible based upon existing site conditions; (2) Located in areas not subjecf to ground slumping or sliding; (3) Located to provide adequate distance befween adjoining buildings for adequate lighf, air circulation, and fire-fighting; and (4) Oriented with considerafion for sun and wind. Section 2:Application Narrative 2-8 Tualatin Valley Fire 8� Rescue Walnut Street Fire Station August 14, 2007 b. Trees shall be preserved to the extent possible. Replacemenf of trees is subjecf to the requirements of Chapter 18.790, Tree Removal. Response: The proposed fire station has been designed and sited in such a way as to preserve the natural and physical environment to the greatest extent possible. Existing site conditions such as trees, topography and natural drainage were taken in to consideration when planning for the proposed development. Additionally, the Landscape Plan (Exhibit E) were prepared by Otten Landscaping and were designed to comply with all applicable Code requirements, including those found in Chapter 18.790, Tree Removal. 3. Exterior elevations: a. Along the vertical face of single-family attached and multiple-family structures... Response: The proposed fire station is not a residential use and therefore this criteria is not applicable. 4. Buffering, screening and compatibility between adjoining uses: a. Buffering shall be provided befween different types of land uses, for example, between single- family and multiple-family residential, and residential and commercia! uses, and the fo!lowing factors shall be considered in determining the adequacy of the type and extent of the buffer: (1) The purpose of the buffer, for example to decrease noise levels, absorb air pollution, filter dust, or to provide a visual barrier, (2) The size of the buffer required to achieve the purpose in terms of width and height; (3) The direction(s) from which buffering is needed; (4) The required density of the buffering; and (5) Whether fhe viewer is stationary or mobile. b. On site screening from view from adjoining properties of such things as service areas, storage areas, parking lots, and mechanical devices on roof tops, i.e., air cooling and heating sysfems, shall be provided and the following factors will be considered in determining the adequacy of the type and exfent of the screening: (1) What needs to be screened; (2) The direction from which it is needed; (3) How dense the screen needs to be; (4) Whether the viewer is stationary or mobile; and (5) Whether the screening needs to be year around. Response: As required by Chapter 18.745, Landscaping and Screening, the fire station and the associated parking area will be screened as appropriate and this has been documented on the � submitted Landscape Plan (Exhibit E). 5. Privacy and noise:multi-family or group living uses... Section 2: Application Narrative 2"9 Tualatin Valley Fire&Rescue Walnut Street Fire Station August 14,2007 6. Private outdoor area: mulfi-family use... 7. Shared outdoor recreation areas: multi-family use... Response: The proposed fire station is not a residential use and therefore these criteria are not applicable. 8. Where landfill and/or development is allowed within and adjacent to the 100-year floodplain... Response: The site for the proposed fire station improvement is not within or adjacent to the 100-year floodplain and, therefore, this criterion does not apply. 9. Demarcation of public, semi-public and private spaces for crime prevention: a. The strucfures and site improvements shall be designed so that public areas such as streets or public gathering places, semi-public areas and private oufdoor areas are clearly defined to establish persons having a righf to be in the space, fo provide for crime prevention and to establish maintenance responsibility; and b. These areas may be defined by, but not limited fo: (1) A deck, patio, low wall, hedge, or draping vine; (2) A trellis or arbor; (3) A change in elevation or grade; (4) A change in the texture of the path maferial; (5) Sign; or (6) Landscaping. Response: The applicant is well aware of the critical need for attention to public safety and crime prevention in the design, operation and management of the fire station. The site plans for the development reflect the following defensible space guidelines: o Clear lines of sight and visibility of public areas; and o Use of lighting to avoid dark spaces and assure safety and comfort for members of the public. Additionally, members of the fire department will be stationed on-site. 10. Crime prevention and safety: a. Windows shall be located so that areas vulnerable to crime can be surveyed by the occupants; b. Interior Iaundry and service areas shal! be located in a way that they can be observed by others; c. Mail boxes shall be located in lighfed areas having vehicular or pedestrian traffrc; Section 2: Application Narrative 2"�� Tualatin Valley Fire& Rescue Walnut Street Fire Station August 14, 2007 d. The exterior lighting levels shall be selected and the angles shall be oriented towards areas vulnerable to crime; and fixtures shall be provided in areas having heavy pedestrian or vehicular traffic and in pofentially dangerous areas such as parking lots, stairs, ramps and abrupt grade changes. Fixtures shall be placed at a height so that light patterns overlap at a height of seven feet which is sufficient fo illuminafe a person. Response: The fire station has been designed to allow clear lines of sight and visibility in public areas and do not include any interior public laundry or service areas or mailboxes. As stated previously, the site crime prevention and safety has been thoroughly addressed including issues regarding lighting. Additionally, the Lighting Plan was prepared to comply with all applicable Code requirements and this has been documented as Exhibit E. 11. Public transit: a. Provisions within the plan shall be included for providing for transit if the development proposal is adjacent to or within 500 feet of existing or proposed transit route; b. The requirements for transit facilities shall be based on: (1) The locafion of other transit facilities in fhe area; and (2) The size and type of the proposal. c. The following facilities may be required after City and Tri-Met review: (1) Bus stop shelters; (2) Turnouts for buses; and (3) Connecting paths fo the shelfers. Response: The nearest bus route to the proposed site at 12585 SW Walnut Street. The nearest bus line is the TriMet bus number 45 which stops at SW Walnut and 1215� Street; less than half a mile from the site. 12. Landscaping: a. All Iandscaping shal! be designed in accordance with the requirements sef forth in Chapter 9 8.745; b. In addition to the open space and recreation area requirements of subsections 5 and 6 above, a minimum of 20 percenf of the gross area including parking, loading and service areas shal! be landscaped; and c. A minimum of 15 percent of the gross sife area shall be landscaped. Response: As shown on the submitted Landscape Plans, all landscaping has been designed in accordance with Chapter 18.745. The proposed development site is approximately 142,231 square feet; the landscaping is approximately 21,986 square feet resulting in approximately 15.5% of the site being landscaped. 13. Drainage: All drainage plans shal! be designed in accordance with the criteria in the adopted 1981 master drainage plan; Section 2:Application Narrative 2-�� Tualatin Valley Fire&Rescue Walnut Street Fire Station August 14, 2007 Response: As documented in the submitted plan set; drainage for the site has been designed in accordance to meet all of the applicable regulations including the 1981 master drainage plan. 14. Provision for the disabled: All facilities for the disabled sha!!be designed in accordance with the requirements sef forth in ORS Chapter 447; and Response: The applicant has designed the fire station in conformance with all applicable ADA and state regulations, ensuring safe and convenient access for all members of the public. 15. All of the provisions and regulations of the underlying zone shall apply unless modified by other sections or this title, e.g., Planned Developments, Chapter 18.350; or a variance or adjustment granted under Chapfer 18.370. Response: The proposed improvements meet the applicable provisions and regulations of the underlying zone, R-4.5: Low-Density Residential District, as documented on pages 2-18 through 2-19. Section 2: Application Narrative Z'�2 Tualatin Valley Fire&Rescue Walnut Street Fire Station August 14, 2007 Chapter 18.370 VARIANCES AND ADJUSTMENTS 18.370.010 Variances Response: The applicant is not requesting a variance to any code provisions for this development. 18.370.020 Adjustments A. Purpose. The purpose of fhis section is to establish two classes of special variances: 2. "Specia! adjustments" which are variances from development standards which have their own approval criferia as opposed to the standard approval criteria for variances contained in Section 18.370.020.C. Response: Given the unique characteristics of the site and the nature of the proposed activity, the applicant is requesting a special adjustment to the access and egress standards for driveway spacing. B. Development adjustments. Response: The applicant is not requesting a development adjustment as described in this subsection. C. Specia!adjustments. 9. Adjustments to development standards within subdivisions... 2. Adjustment to minimum residential density requirements... 3. For adjustments to density requirements in Washington Square Regiona! Center... 4. For Modifications fo dimensional and minimum density requirements... Response: The applicant is not requesting an adjustment related to any of the sections listed above. 5. Adjustment to access and egress standards (Chapter 18.705). a. In all zoning districts where access and egress drives cannot be readily designed to conform to Code standards within a particular parcel, access with an adjoining property shal! be considered. If access in conjunction with anofher parcel cannot reasonably be achieved, the Director may grant an adjustment to the access requirements of Chapter 18.705 through a Type ll procedure, as governed in Section 18.390.030, using approva! criteria contained in Subsection 2b below. b. The Director may approve, approve with conditions, or deny a request for an adjustmenf from the access requirements contained in Chapter 18.705, based on the following criteria: (1) It is not possible to share access; (2) There are no other alternative access points on the street in question or from another street; (3) The access separation requirements cannot be met; (4) The requesf is the minimum adjustment required to provide adequate access; (5) The approved access or access approved with condifions will result in a safe access; and Section 2:Application Narrative 2-�3 Tualatin Valley Fire&Rescue Walnut Street Fire Station August 14, 2007 (6) The visual clearance requirements of Chapter 18.795 will be met. Response: The proposed fire station is being sited within a residential neighborhood and the east driveway, which will give access to fire apparatus and fire station employees only, will be located approximately 25 feet from the nearest residential driveway on the east. It would not be appropriate for this driveway to share access with a residential use as it is intended for the use of fire trucks and employee vehicles. Additionally, the center access which is between the east and west access will be for exiting fire trucks only; no other vehicles will be permitted to use this driveway. The western access will only serve the visitor parking lot area and will allow for the entry and exit of visitor vehicles and exit only for fire station employees. A gate has been provided at the terminus of the western parking area, restricting visitor access to both the center and eastern driveways. Additionally, in an effort to preserve the sensitive environmental areas on site all development related to the fire station has been concentrated in the southeastern corner of the site. While this has restricted the spacing of the driveways it has allowed the on-site wetlands and waterway to remain undisturbed. The additional trips to and from the site will not add any significant traffic increases onto SW Walnut Street and for safety purposes it is necessary to maintain the separation of vehicles as is further discussed in the Traffic Impact Study and Adjustment Memorandum (Exhibit F) that has been submitted with this application. 6. Adjustments to landscaping requirements... 7. Adjustments to parking standards... 8. Adjustments to sign code... 9. Adjustments to setbacks to reduce tree removal... 10. Adjustments to wireless communication facilifies... Response: The applicant is not requesting an adjustment related to any of the sections listed above. Section 2:Application Narrative 2'�4 Tualatin Valley Fire 8�Rescue Walnut Street Fire Station August 14,2007 Chapter 18.390 DECISION-MAKING PROCEDURES 18.390.020 Description of Decision-Making Procedures A. General. Alf development permit applications shal! be decided by using one of the fo!lowing procedure types. The procedure type assigned to each action governs fhe decision-making process for that permit, except to the extent otherwise required by applicable state or federal law. The Director shall be responsible for assigning specific procedure types to individua! permit or action requests, as requested. Special alternative decision-making procedures have been developed by the City in accordance with existing stafe law, and are codified in Section 18.390.070. Response: Per code section 18.330.020, the proposed development, a new fire station at 12585 SW Walnut Street, is an initial application for a new conditional use; a Type III-HO procedure. B. Types defined. There are four types of decision-making procedures, as follows: 3. Type !Il Procedure. Type lll procedures apply to quasi Judicia! permifs and actions thaf predominantly contain discretionary approval criferia. Type !I! actions are decided by either the Hearings Office (Type !I!-HO) or the Planning Commission (Type lll-PC), with appeals to or review by the City Council; Response: The applicant understands that a Type III-HO procedure is required when processing an initial application for a new conditional use which is required for the proposed development. Such an application is included in this submittal. C. Summary of permits by decision-making procedure type. Table 18.390.1 summarizes the various land use permits by fhe type of decision-making procedure. Response: The Table below shows an excerpt from Table 18.390.1 of the Tigard Development Code (TDC). As shown, the Type IIIA application requires the consideration of the Hearings Officer and that chapter 18.330 is addressed. This development application addresses all applicable sections of 18.330 (see page 2-1 through 2-5) and the applicant understands that they shall present this project to the Hearings Officer at the appointed time. Table 2-2. Conditional Use Decision-Making Procedure T e Permit/Land Cross-Reference IIIA (18.390.050) Conditional Use 18.330.030 Hearin s Officer - Initial 18.390.050 Type III Procedure A. Pre-application conference. A pre-applicafion conference is required for aN Type !!I actions. The requirements and procedures for a pre-application conference are described in Section 18.390.080C. Response: A pre-application conference was held on Thursday, February 8, 2007 at 11 am. B. Application requirements. 1. Application forms. Type lll applications shall be made on forms provided by the Director as provided by Section 18.390.080 E1; Section 2: Application Narrative 2-15 Tualatin Valley Fire&Rescue Walnut Street Fire Station August 14, 2007 Response: The correct, Director provided, forms have been completed and submitted with this development application (see the "Application" section at the front of this submittal). 2. Contenf. Type lll applications shall: a. Include the information requesfed on the application form; b. Address the relevanf criteria in sufficient detail for review and action; c. Be accompanied by the required fee; d. Include two sefs of pre-stamped, pre-addressed envelopes for a!I persons who are property owners of record as specified in Section 18.390.050C. The records of the Washington County Department of Assessment and Taxation shall be the official records for determining ownership. The applicant shall demonstrafe that the most currenf assessment records have been used to produce the notice list; e. Include an impact study. The impact study shal! quantify the effect of the development on public facilities and services. The study shall address, at a minimum, the transportation system, including bikeways, fhe drainage system, the parks system, the water system, the sewer system, and the noise impacts of the development. For each public facility system and type of impact, the study shall propose improvemenfs necessary to meet City standards and to minimize the impact of the development on fhe public at large, public facilities sysfems, and affected private property users. In situations where the Community Development Code requires the dedication of real property interesfs, the applicanf shall either specifically concur with the dedication requirements, or provide evidence which supports the conclusion thaf the rea!property dedication requirement is not roughly proportional to the projected impacfs of the development. Response: All required forms and submittal information have been included as part of the application package for the proposed development, including the required fee, two sets of pre-stamped and pre- addressed envelopes for the notice, and a narrative addressing all applicable approval criteria. Impacts from the proposed development are addressed as follows: • Transportation System: See Exhibit F, Transportation Impact Analysis (TIA). The TIA identifies the potential transportation system impacts from the fire station. • Drainage System: See Exhibit H, Storm Drainage Report, and Exhibit B, CWS Service Provider Letter. The stormwater will be collected by catch basins and routed to a 100' vegetated bioswale for water quality treatment and detention before being released into the wetland buffer and flowing overland into Krueger Creek. This project will not be using the public storm water system and, therefore, there will be no impact to that system. • Parks System: The proposed project does not have a residential component. Therefore, it is note expected to have an adverse impact on the Parks system. However, the site is adjacent to Jack Park but does not expect to impact the park negatively. Once development of the fire station is complete, the undeveloped portion of the site will be divided from the fire station and incorporated into Jack Park. • Water System: Water service is available to the site from an existing water main in SW Walnut Street. The necessary improvements to connect to the water main will be completed by the applicant and the proposed improvements are not expected to have any adverse impact on the City's water system. Section 2:Application Narrative 2-16 Tualatin Valley Fire&Rescue Walnut Street Fire Station August 14, 2007 Revised • Sewer System: A sanitary sewer line is available to the site in SW Walnut Street. As with the water service, the applicant will complete the necessary improvements to connect to the service and these improvements are not expected to have any adverse impacts on the City's system. • Noise Impacts: Under state law the fire trucks only use their sirens when it is necessary to move traffic out of the way. With the signal on SW Walnut Street, sirens will not be necessary as fire trucks exit the station. After 10pm they try to use their sirens as little as possible and make every effort to just use their lights. Additionally, fire trucks will not use their back-up sensors when backing into a station in a residential neighborhood. The noise impacts should be minimal to the neighborhood. C. Notice of hearing. Response: The applicant understands that a mailed notice of a Type III hearing shall being given by the Director in the manner that is outlined in Section 18.390.050.C.1.a through d and the applicant will, at least ten business days prior to the hearing, post a notice of the hearing on the site, pursuant to Section 18.390.050.C.2 below. Additionally, the applicant will prepare an affidavit of posting concerning the notice and submit the affidavit to make it part of the administrative record. D. Conduct of the hearing. E. The decision process. Response: The applicant understands that the approval or denial of a Type III action shall be based on standards and criteria, set forth in the City's Development Code, which shall relate approval or denial of a discretionary permit application to the development ordinance and, when appropriate, to the comprehensive plan for the area in which the development would occur and to the development ordinance and comprehensive plan for the City as a whole. F. Notice of decision. Response: That notice of a Type III decision shall be mailed to the applicant and to all parties of record within five business days after the decision is filed by the Review Authority with the Director, is acknowledged and understood by the applicant. G. Final decision Response: The applicant understands that the decision of the Hearings Officer in a Type III action is final, for purposes of appeal; on the date notice of the decision is mailed. It is also understood that any party with standing may appeal a Type III decision to the City Council by filing a Notice of Appeal with the Director within 10 business days of the date notice of the decision is mailed and that the notice shall be in the form specified in Section 18.390.040 G.2(a)(2) and the procedures of Sections 18.390.050 C- F shall be included. Section 2:Application Narrative 2-17 Tualatin Valley Fire&Rescue Walnut Street Fire Station August 14, 2007 Revised Chapter 18.510 RESIDENTIAL ZONING DISTRICTS 18.510.020 List of Zoning Districts D. R-4.5: Low-Density Residential District. The R-4.5 zoning district is designed to accommodafe detached single-family homes wifh or without accessory residentia!units at a minimum !ot size of 7,500 square feet. Duplexes and attached single-family units are permitted conditionally. Some civic and institutional uses are also permitted conditionally. Response: The site for the proposed fire station is zoned R-4.5. The fire station has been categorized as an "Emergency Service" and requires a Conditional Use review within this zone. A Conditional Use has been included as part of this development application and can be found on pages 2-1 through 2-5. 18.510.030 Uses A. Types of uses. For the purposes of this chapter, there are four kinds of use: 3. A condifional use (C) is a use the approva!of which is discretionary with the Hearings Officer. The approval process and criteria are set forth in Chapfers 98.310 and 18.320. If a use is not listed as a conditional use, it may be held to be a similar unlisted used under the provisions of Chapter 18.230; Response: The proposed fire station has been categorized as an "Emergency Service" which requires Conditional Use approval within the R-4.5 zone. B. Use table. A list of permitted, limited, conditional and prohibited uses in residential zones is presented in Table 18.510.1. Response: Per Table 18.510.1 of the Tigard Development Code (TDC), "Emergency Services", such as the proposed fire station, are a Conditional Use within the R-4.5 zone. 18.510.040 Minimum and Maximum Densities A. Purpose. The purpose of this secfion is to esfablish minimum and maximum densities... Response: The development proposed is a fire station and not a residential development; therefore minimum and maximum densities are not necessary and this code section is not applicable. 18.510.050 Development Standards A. Compliance required. All development must comply with: 1. All of the applicable development standards contained in the underlying zoning district, except where fhe applicant has obtained variances or adjustments in accordance with Chapters 18.370; 2. Al!other applicable standards and requirements contained in this title. Response: The applicant understands that all development must comply with all of the applicable development standards contained within the underlying zoning district and within this entire title expect for where a variance or adjustment has been obtained. 8. Development Standards. Development standards in residential zoning districts are contained in Table 18.510.2. Section 2: Application Narrative 2�18 Tualatin Valley Fire&Rescue Walnut Street Fire Station August 14,2007 Response: As shown in Table 2-3 below, the proposed development meets all of the applicable development standards laid out in Table 18.510.2 of the TDC. Table 2-3. Development Standards Standard R-4.5 Proposed Development from TDC,Table 18.510.2 Minimum Lot Size (Detached Unit) 7,500 square feet 3.3 acres (approximately 142,231 s uare feet Avera e Minimum Lot Width 50 feet 467 feet Maximum Lot Coverage - 43,165 square feet a roximatel 30% Minimum Setbacks - Front ard 20 feet 20 feet - Side facin street on corner and throu h lots 15 feet N/A - Side yard 5 feet East: 66.5 feet West: 281 feet a rox. - Rear ard 15 feet 141 feet a rox. - Side or rear yard abutting more restrictive - - zonin district - Distance between property line and front of 20 feet N/A a ra e Maximum Hei ht 30 feet 26 feet, 11 inches Minimum Landsca e Re uirement - 15.5% landsca in 18.510.060 Accessory Structures A. Permitted uses. Accessory sfructures are permitted by right in all residential zones... Response: There are no accessory structures proposed as part of this development; therefore this code section is not applicable. Section 2:Application Narrative 2-19 Tualatin Valley Fire&Rescue Walnut Street Fire Station August 14, 2007 Chapter 18.705 ACCESS, EGRESS, AND CIRCULATION 18.705.020 Applicability of Provisions A. When provisions apply. The provisions of this chapter shall apply to al! development including the construction of new strucfures, the remodeling of existing structures (see Section 18.360.050), and to a change of use which increases the on-site parking or loading requirements or which changes the access requirements. Response: The proposed development includes the construction of a new structure (a fire station) and therefore this chapter is applicable. 8. Change or enlargement of use... Response: There is no change or enlargement of use proposed as part of this project and therefore this criterion is not applicable. C. When site design review is not required. Where the provisions of Chapter 18.360, Site Development Review, do not apply, the Director shall approve, approve with conditions, or deny an access plan submitted under the provisions of this chapter in conjunction with another permit or land use action. Response: Site design review has not been required; however, the criteria of Chapter 18.360 Site Development Review have been required and have been addressed on pages 2-6 through 2-12 of this development application. D. Conflict with subdivision requirements... Response: The proposed development does not contain a request for a subdivision and therefore this criterion is not applicable. 18.705.030 General Provisions A. Continuing obligation of property owner. The provisions and maintenance of access and egress stipulated in this fitle are continuing requirements for the use of any structure or parcel of real property in the City. Response: The applicant understands that the provisions and maintenance of access and egress stipulated in this title are continuing requirements for the use of any structure or parcel of real property in the City. 8. Access plan requirements. No building or other permit shall be issued until scaled plans are presented and approved as provided by this chapter that show how access, egress and circulation requirements are to be fulfilled. The appficant shall submit a site plan. The Director shall provide the applicanf with detailed information about this submission requiremenf. Response: The applicant understands that no building or other permits will be issued until scaled plans are presented and approved showing how access, egress and circulation requirements are fulfilled. A scaled Site Plan has been submitted with this development application as part of Exhibit E. C. Joint access... Response: The applicant is not proposing any joint access agreements at this time. Section 2:Application Narrative 2"2� Tualatin Valley Fire& Rescue Walnut Street Fire Station August 14,2007 D. Public street access. All vehicular access and egress as required in Secfions 18.705.030H and 18.705.030!shall connect direcfly with a public or private street approved by the Cify for public use and shall be maintained at the required sfandards on a continuous basis. Response: The access and egress to the proposed fire station connects directly with SW Walnut Street (a public street) and will be maintained at the required standards on a continuous basis. E. Curb cuts. Curb cuts shall be in accordance with Section 18.810.030.N. Response: Curb cuts will be in accordance with Section 18.810.030.N as applicable. F. Required walkway location. On-site pedestrian walkways shaN comply with the foNowing standards: 1. Walkways shal! exfend from the ground floor entrances or from the ground floor landing of stairs, ramps, or elevators of all commercial, institutional, and industrial uses, to the sfreets which provide the required access and egress. Walkways shal!provide convenient connections between buildings in multi-building commercial, institutional, and industria! complexes. Unless impractical, walkways shall be constructed between new and exisfing developments and neighboring developments; Response: As shown on the site plan (Exhibit E) walkways extend from the ground entrances on both the east and west sides of the fire station and provide the required access and egress that connects to the existing sidewalk and pedestrian system along SW Walnut Street. 2. Within a!!attached housing (except two-family dwellings) and multi-family developments... Response: The proposed development does not contain any attached housing or multi-family developments and therefore this criterion is not applicable. 3. Wherever required walkways cross vehicle access driveways or parking lots... Response: None of the required walkways cross vehicle access driveways or parking lots and therefore this criterion is not applicable. 4. Required walkways shall be paved with hard surfaced materials such as concrete, asphalt, stone, brick, etc. Walkways may be required to be lighted and/or signed as needed for safety purposes. Soft-surfaced public use pathways may be provided only if such pathways are provided in addifion to required pafhways. Response: The required walkways will be paved with concrete and will be lighted and/or signed as required for safety purposes. G. lnadequate or hazardous access. 9. Applications for building permits shall be referred to the Commission for review when, in fhe opinion of the Director, the access proposed: a. Would cause or increase existing hazardous traffic conditions; or b. Would provide inadequate access for emergency vehicles; or c. Would in any other way cause hazardous conditions to exist which would constitufe a clear and present danger to fhe public health, safety, and genera!welfare. Section 2: Application Narrative 2-2� Tualatin Valley Fire& Rescue Walnut Street Fire Station August 14, 2007 Response: The applicant understands that building permit applications will be referred to the Commission for review if the proposed access would cause or increase existing hazardous traffic condition, would provide inadequate emergency vehicle access or would cause any other hazardous condition. 2. Direct individua!access to arteria!or co!lector streets from single-family dwe!lings and duplex lofs sha!!be discouraged... Response: The proposed development does not contain any single-family dwellings or duplex lots and therefore this criterion is not applicable. 3. In no case shall the design of the service drive or drives require or facilitate the backward movement or other maneuvering of a vehicle within a street, other than an alley. Single-family and duplex dwellings are exempt from this requirement. Response: The drives associated with the proposed fire station will not require or facilitate the backward movement or other maneuvering of a vehicle within a street. H. Access Management 1. An access report shall be submitted with all new development proposals which verifies design of driveways and streets are safe by meefing adequate stacking needs, sight distance and deceleration standards as set by OD�T, Washington Counfy, the City and AASHTO (depending on jurisdiction of facility.) Response: A Traffic Impact Analysis, which contains the necessary information regarding access, has been submitted with this development proposal as Exhibit F and verifies the safety of the design of development's driveways. 2. Driveways shal! not be permitted to be placed in the influence area of collector or arterial street intersections. Influence area of intersections is that area where queues of fraffic commonly form on approach to an intersection. The minimum driveway setback from a collector or arterial streef infersection shal! be 150 feet, measured from the right-of-way line of fhe intersecfing street to fhe throat of the proposed driveway. The sefback may be greater depending upon the influence area, as determined from City Engineer review of a traffic impact report submitted by the applicant's traffic engineer. In a case where a project has less than 150 feet of street frontage, fhe applicanf must explore any option for shared access with the adjacent parcel. If shared access is not possible or practical, fhe driveway shall be placed as far from fhe intersection as possible. Response: There are no driveways within the influence area of any collector or arterial streets as part of this proposed development. 3. The minimum spacing of driveways and streets along a collector shall be 200 feet. The minimum spacing of driveways and streefs along an arterial sha!!be 600 feet. Response: The proposed fire station's driveways will take access off of SW Walnut Street (a major collector street) and as shown on the submitted site plans, the driveways are not spaced as required and the applicant is requesting an adjustment to this standard pursuant to Section 18.370.020.C.5 (see page 2-13 of this application). The site's driveway spacing is also discussed in more detail within ' Exhibit F, Traffic Impact Analysis and Adjustment Memorandum, of this application. 4. The minimum spacing of local streefs along a local street shall be 125 feet. Section 2: Application Narrative 2-22 Tualatin Valley Fire&Rescue Walnut Street Fire Station August 14,2007 Response: The proposed fire station is not on a local street and therefore this criterion is not applicable. l. Minimum access requirements for residential use. 1. Vehicular access and egress for single-family, duplex or attached single-family dwelling units... Response: The proposed fire station is not a single-family, duplex or attached single-family dwelling unit and therefore this criterion is not applicable. 2. Vehicular access to multi-family structures shall be brought to within 50 feet of the ground floor entrance or the ground floor landing of a stairway, ramp, or elevator leading to the dwelling units; Response: The proposed development does not contain a multi-family structure and therefore this criterion is not applicable. 3. Private residential access drives shall be provided and maintained in accordance with the provisions of the Uniform Fire Code; Response: There are no private residential access drives associated with this property and therefore this criterion is not applicable. 4. Access drives in excess of 150 feet in length shall be provided with approved provisions for the turning around of fire apparatus by one of the following: a. A circular, paved surface having a minimum turn radius measured from center point to outside edge of 35 feef; b. A hammerhead-configured, paved surface with each !eg of the hammerhead having a minimum depth of 40 feet and a minimum width of 20 feet; c. The maximum cross slope of a required turnaround is 5%. Response: The proposed development is for a fire station and the access drives have been designed to allow for the necessary fire apparatus turning movements. 5. Vehicle turnouts, (providing a minimum tota!driveway width of 24 feet for a distance of at least 30 feet), may be required so as to reduce the need for excessive vehicular backing motions in situations where two vehicles traveling in opposite directions meet on driveways in excess of 200 feet in length; Response: The applicant understands that vehicle turnouts may be required so as to reduce the need for excessive vehicular backing motions in certain situations. 6. Where permitted, minimum widfh for driveway approaches to arterials or collecfor streets shal!be no less than 20 feet so as to avoid traffic turning from the streef having to wait for traffic exiting the site. Response: The driveway approaches for the proposed development have been designed to meet all applicable code standards and requirements in the Tigard Development Code. J. Minimum access requirements for commercial and indusfrial use. Section 2:Application Narrative 2'23 Tualatin Valley Fire&Rescue Walnut Street Fire Station August 14, 2007 9. Vehicle access, egress and circulation for commercial and industrial use shall not be less than 29 as provided in Table 18.705.3; Table 2-4. Vehicular AccesslEgress Requirements* Required Parking Spaces Minimum Number of Minimum Minimum Pavement Drivewa s Re uired Access Width 33 (per Chapter 18.765 Off-Street 9 30' 24'curbs required Parkin and Loadin Re uirements "Per Februa 8,2007 Pre-A lication Conference Notes, Pa e 2 of 8,"Access" 2. Vehicular access shal! be provided to commercia! or industrial uses, and shal! be located to within 50 feet of the primary ground floor entrances; 3. Additional requirements for truck traffic may be placed as conditions of site development review. Response: Table 2-5. Proposed Vehicular AccesslEgress Parking Spaces Driveways Access Width Minimum Pavement Pro osed Pro osed 39 3 West: 30 feet West: 30' curbs Central: 46 feet, 8 inches` Central: 46 feet, 8 inches* East: 30 feet East: 30 feet `The central drivewa will be onl for fire de art a aratus and will be closed to all other vehicular traffic. Vehicular access has been proposed as detailed in the table above and as discussed in the TIA (Exhibit F). Additionally, all accesses are within 50 feet of the primary entrances as required. K. One-way vehicular access points. Where a proposed parking facility indicates only one-way traffic flow on fhe site, it shaN be accommodafed by a specific driveway serving the facility; the entrance drive shall be situated closest fo oncoming fraffic and fhe exit drive shall be situated farthest from oncoming traffic. Response: The east driveway for the proposed site is a one-way vehicular access to be used as the employee entrance. This access, the entrance drive, is situated closest to oncoming traffic while the exit drive, the western access, is located farthest away from oncoming traffic. L. Director's authority to restrict access. The Director has the authority to resfrict access... Response: The applicant understands that the Director has the authority to restrict access when necessary and when certain criteria are met. Section 2: Application Narrative z'24 Tualatin Valley Fire&Rescue Walnut Street Fire Station August 14, 2007 Revised Chapter 18.725 ENVIRONMENTAL PERFORMANCE STANDARDS 18.725.020 General Provisions A. Compliance with applicable state and federal regulations. In addition to the regulations adopted in this chapter, each use, activity or operation within fhe City of Tigard shall comply with the applicable state and federal standards pertaining to noise, odor and discharge of matter into the atmosphere, ground, sewer system or stream. Regulations adopted by the State Environmental Quality Commission pertaining fo non-point source pollution control and confained in the Oregon Administrative Rules shal! by this reference be made a part of fhis chapter. Response: The applicant will comply with all applicable state and federal regulations including applicable state and federal standards pertaining to noise, odor and discharge of matter into the atmosphere, ground, sewer system or stream. The applicant understands that the State Environmental Quality Commission regulations pertaining to non-point source pollution control and contained in the Oregon Administrative Rules are also a part of this chapter and will also comply with those regulations. Additionally, A Natural Resource Assessment Report has been submitted with this application as Exhibit J. B. Evidence of compliance. Prior to issuance of a building permif, the Director may require submission of evidence demonstrating compliance with state, federal and local environmental regulafions and receipt of necessary permits; these include Air Contaminant Discharge Permits (ACDP) or Indirect Source Construction Permits (lSCP). Response: The applicant understands that the Director may require the submission of evidence of compliance for environmental standards and will produce such evidence if required. C. Continuing obligation. Compliance with state, federal and local environmental regulations is the continuing obligation of the property owner and operator. Response: The applicant understands that compliance with state, federal and local environmental regulations is the continuing obligation of the property owner and operator and will endeavor to meet that obligation. 15.725.030 Performance Standards A. Noise. For the purposes of noise regulation, the provisions of Sections 7.40.130 through 7.40.210 of the Tigard Municipal Code shal!apply. Response: The applicant is familiar with the provisions of Sections 7.40.130 through 7.40.210 of the Tigard Municipal Code and will meet those provisions as applicable. 8. Visible emissions. Within the commercial zoning districts and the industrial park (IP) zoning districf, there shall be no use, operation or activify which results in a stack or ofher point- source emission, other than an emission from space heating, or the emission of pure uncombined water(steam) which is visible from a property line. Department of Environmental Quality (DEQ) rules for visible emissions (340-21-015 and 340-28-070) apply. Response: There will be no use, operation or activity that results in a stack or other point-source emission or emission of pure uncombined water (steam) which is visible from a property line associated with this project. Section 2:Application Narrative 2-25 Tualatin Valley Fire&Rescue Walnut Street Fire Station August 14, 2007 C. Vibration. No vibration other than that caused by highway vehicles, trains and aircraft is permitted in any given zoning district which is discernible wifhout instruments at the property line of the use concerned. Response: There will be no vibration associated with the proposed development other than that caused by highway vehicles, trains and aircraft which is discernible without instruments at the property line of the use concerned. D. Odors. The emission of odorous gases or other matter in such quantities as to be readily detectable at any point beyond the property line of the use creating the odors is prohibited. DEQ rules for odors (340-028-090) apply. Response: There will be no emission of odorous gases or other matter in such quantities as to be readily detectable at any point beyond the property line of the proposed development. E. Glare and heat. No direct or sky-reflected glare, whether from floodlights or from high temperature processes such as combustion or welding, which is visible at the lot line shall be permitted, and; 1. There shal! be no emission or transmission of heat or heated air which is discernible at the lot line of the source; and 2. These regulations shall not apply to signs or floodlights in parking areas or construcfron equipment at fhe time of consfruction or excavation work otherwise permitfed by this title. Response: There will be no direct or sky-reflected glare visible from the lot line of the proposed development nor will there be any emissions or transmissions of heat or heated air which is discernible at the lot line of the source. F. lnsects and rodents. All materials including wastes shall be stored and al! grounds shall be maintained in a manner which will not attracf or aid the propagation of insects or rodents or create a health hazard. Response: The applicant understands and agrees that all materials including wastes will be stored and all grounds shall be maintained in a manner which will not attract or aid the propagation of insects or rodents or create a health hazard. Section 2:Application Narrative 2-26 Tualatin Valley Fire& Rescue Walnut Street Fire Station August 14,2007 Chapter 18.730 EXCEPTIONS TO DEVELOPMENT STANDARDS 18.730.020 Exceptions to Building Height Limitations... Response: The proposed development is not requesting an exception to the building height limitations and therefore this Code section is not applicable. 18.730.030 Zero Lot Line Setback Standards A. Applicability and limitations. The provisions of fhis chapter apply to the R-4.5 and R-7 zoning districts and are limited to single-family detached dwelling units... Response: The proposed development is not a single-family detached dwelling and therefore this Code section is not applicable. 18.730.040 Additional Setback Requirements... Response: Per Tigard Development Code section 18.330.050.B.16.a, the proposed development is required to meet the minimum setbacks in the applicable zone and the applicant is not requesting any exceptions to the setback requirements and therefore this Code section is not applicable. 18.730.050 Miscellaneous Requirements and Exceptions A. When abutting properties have non-conforming front setbacks... B. When one abutting property has a non-conforming front setback... Response: The proposed development will have a front setback of 20 feet; which is allowed by the TDC and will not be adjusting the setback as described above. C. Storage in front yard... D. Projections into required yards... E. Lot area for flag lots... Response: The proposed development will have no storage in the front yard; will not have any projections into required yards and is not located on a flag Iot; therefore the three criteria above are not applicable. Section 2: Application Narrative Z'2� Tualatin Valley Fire&Rescue Walnut Street Fire Station August 14, 2007 Chapter 18.745 LANDSCAPING AND SCREENING 18.745.020 Applicability A. Applicability. The provisions of this chapter sha/l apply to all development including the construction of new structures, remodeling of existing structures where the landscaping is nonconforming (Section 98.760.040.C), and to a change of use which results in the need for increased on-site parking or loading requirements or which changes the access requirements. Response: The proposed development will require the construction of a new structure and therefore this chapter is applicable and will be addressed in the following narrative. 8. When site development review does not apply. Where the provisions of Chapter 18.360, Site Development Review, do nof apply, the Director shall approve, approve with conditions, or deny a plan submitted under the provisions of this chapter by means of a Type 1 procedure, as governed by Section 18.390.030, using the applicable standards in this chapter. Response: Site development review does apply to the proposed project and has been addressed on pages 2-6 through 2-12 of this development application. C. Site plan requirements. The applicant shall submit a site pfan. The Director shal! provide the applicant with detailed informafion about this submission requirement. Response: A site plan has been submitted with this application as part of Exhibit E. 18.745.030 General Provisions A. Obligation to maintain. Unless otherwise provided by the lease agreement, fhe owner, tenant and his agent, if any, shall be jointly and severally responsible for the maintenance of all landscaping and screening which shaU be maintained in good condition so as to present a healthy, neat and orderly appearance, shall be replaced or repaired as necessary, and shal!be kept free from refuse and debris. Response: The applicant understands that they have an obligation to maintain all landscaping and screening and will do so in order to present a healthy, neat and orderly appearance. Landscaping and screening will be replaced or repaired as necessary and will be kept free from refuse and debris. B. Pruning required. All plant growth in landscaped areas of developments sha!! be controlled by pruning, trimming or otherwise so that: 1. It wil!not interfere with the mainfenance or repair of any public utility; 2. It wiN not restrict pedestrian or vehicular access; and 3. It will not constitute a traffic hazard because of reduced visibility. Response: The applicant understands that all plant growth in landscaped areas is to be controlled by pruning, trimming or otherwise so that there will be no interference of maintenance or repair of any public utilities; it will not restrict access and will not reduce visibility. C. Installation requirements. The insfallation of aIl landscaping shall be as follows: 1. All landscaping shall be insta!!ed according to accepted planting procedures; Section 2:Application Narrative 2"2$ Tualatin Valley Fire 8�Rescue Walnut Street Fire Station August 14,2007 2. The plant materials shall be of high grade, and shall meet the size and grading standards of the American Standards for Nurberg Sfock (ANS/Z60, 1-1986, and any future revisions); and 3. Landscaping shall be installed in accordance with the provisions of this title. Response: The applicant understands and agrees that all landscape installation will be completed according to accepted planting procedures and in accordance with the provision of this title and that all plant materials will be of high grade and meet the necessary standards. D. Certificate of Occupancy. Certificates of occupancy shall not be issued unless the landscaping requiremenfs have been met or other arrangements have been made and approved by the City such as the posting of a bond. Response: The applicant understands that certificates of occupancy will not be issued unless the landscaping requirements have been met or other arrangements have been made and approved by the City. E. Protection of existing vegetation. Existing vegetation on a site shall be protected as much as possible: 1. The developer shall provide methods for the protection of existing vegetation to remain during the construction process; and 2. The plants to be saved shall be noted on the landscape plans (e.g., areas not to be disturbed can be fenced, as in snow fencing which can be placed around individual trees). Response: As detailed in the Arborist Report (Exhibit G) and shown on the Landscape Plans (Exhibit E) all existing vegetation that is being retained is being protected to the extent possible. F. Care of landscaping along public righfs-of-way. Appropriate methods for fhe care and mainfenance of street trees and landscaping materials shall be provided by the owner of the property abutfing fhe righfs-of-way unless othe►wise required for emergency conditions and the safety of the genera!public. Response: The applicant understands that appropriate methods for the care and maintenance of street trees and landscaping materials in the public rights-of-way abutting their property is their responsibility unless otherwise required for emergency conditions and the safety of the general public. G. Conditions of approva! of existing vegetation. The review procedures and standards for required landscaping and screening shall be specified in the conditions of approval during developmenf review and in no instance shall be less than that required for conventional development. Response: The applicant understands that conditions of approval regarding existing vegetation will specify the review procedures and standards for required landscaping and screening and that those conditions will be no less than that required for conventional development. H. Heighf restricfions abutting public rights-of-way. No trees, shrubs or plantings more than 18 inches in height shal! be planted in the public right-of-way abutting roadways having no established curb and gutter. Response: SW Walnut Street, where the proposed development is sited, does have an established curb and gutter and therefore this criterion is not applicable. Section 2:Application Narrative 2-29 Tualatin Valley Fire&Rescue Walnut Street Fire Station August 14,2007 i 18.745.040 Street Trees A. Profection of existing vegetafion. All development projects fronting on a public street, private street or a private driveway more than 100 feet in length approved after the adoption of this title shall be required to plant street trees in accordance with the standards in Section 18.745.040.C. Response: The proposed development does front on a public street (SW Walnut Street) which is more than 100 feet in length and, as shown on the Landscape Plans (Exhibit E), six street trees are being planted along the frontage. 8. Street tree planting list. Certain trees can severely damage utilities, streets and sidewalks or can cause personal injury. Approval of any planting lisf shall be subject to review by the Director. Response: The applicant understands that the planting list is subject to review by the Director and can be found on the Landscape Plan (Exhibit E) of this development application. C. Size and spacing of street trees. 1. Landscaping in fhe front and exterior side yards shall include trees with a minimum caliper of two inches at four feet in height as specified in the requirements stated in Section 18.745.040.C.2 below; Response: There are trees being planted in the front and exterior side yards of the proposed fire station and, as shown on the provided planting list, all have a minimum caliper of two inches. 2. The specific spacing of street trees by size of tree shall be as follows: a. Small or narrow-stafure trees under 25 feet tall and less than 96 feet wide branching at mafurity shall be spaced no greater than 20 feet apart; b. Medium-sized trees 25 feet to 40 feet tall, 16 feet to 35 feet wide branching at maturify shall be spaced no greater than 30 feet apart; c. Large trees over 40 feet taN and more than 35 feet wide branching at maturify shall be spaced no greafer than 40 feet apart; Response: The six street trees being planted along the frontage are Jacquemonti Birch (Betula Jaquemonti� trees that fall into the "Medium-sized" category above and will be spaced 30 feet on center. d. Except for signalized infersections as provided in Section 18.745.040.H, trees shall not be planfed closer than 20 feet from a street intersection, nor closer than two feet from privafe driveways (measured at the back edge of the sidewalk), fire hydrants or utility poles fo maintain visua!clearance; Response: As shown on the provided Landscape Plans, there are no trees planted closer than two feet from any private driveway, fire hydrant or utility pole. e. No new utility pole location shall be established closer than five feet to any existing street tree; Response: There are no new utility poles being located on the site as part of the proposed development and therefore this criterion is not applicable. Section 2:Application Narrative 2-30 Tualatin Valley Fire&Rescue Walnut Street Fire Station August 14,2007 f. Tree pits shall be located so as not to include utilities (e.g., water and gas mefers) in the tree well; Response: All tree pits have been located so as not to include any utilities in the tree well. g. On-premises utilities (e.g., water and gas meters) shal!not be installed within existing tree well areas; Response: There will be no on-premise utilities installed within existing tree well areas. h. Street trees shall not be planted closer than 20 feet to light standards; Response: As shown on the provided Landscape Plans, no street trees have been planted within 20 feet of light standards. i. New light standards shall nof be positioned closer than 20 feet to existing street trees except when public safety dictates, then they may be positioned no closer than 10 feet; Response: There are no new light standards being installed as part of the proposed development and therefore this criterion is not applicable. j. Where there are overhead power lines, the street tree species selected shal! be of a type which, at ful!maturity, will not interfere with the lines; Response: The overhead power lines have been placed underground as part of a prior road improvement project and therefore this criterion is not applicable. k. Trees shall not be planted within two feet from the face of the curb; and Response: As shown on the provided Landscape Plans, there have been no trees planted within two feet from the face of the curb. l. Trees shall not be planfed wifhin two feet of any permanent hard surface paving or walkway: (1) Space between the tree and fhe hard surface may be covered by a nonpermanent hard surface such as grates, bricks on sand, paver blocks and cobblestones; and (2) Sidewalk cufs in concrete for tree planting shall be at least four by four feet to allow for air and water into the roof area. Response: The trees proposed for the development will be planted as specified by the applicable regulations and standards of the Tigard Development Code D. Pruning requirements. Trees, as they grow, shall be pruned to provide at least eight feet of clearance above sidewalks and ?3 feet above local sfreet, 15 feet above collector street, and 18 feet above arterial street roadway surfaces. Response: SW Walnut Street is a collector street and all trees will be pruned to provide at least 15 feet above the street. E. Cut and fill around existing trees. Existing trees may be used as street trees if no cutting or filling takes place within the drip-line of the tree unless an adjustment is approved by the Director by means Section 2:Application Narrative 2-3� Tualatin Valley Fire& Rescue Walnut Street Fire Station August 14,2007 of a Type I procedure, as governed by Section 18.390.030, using approval criteria in Section 18.370.020.C.4.a. Response: No existing trees are being used as street trees and therefore this criterion is not applicable. F. Replacement of street trees. Existing street trees removed by development projects or ofher construction shall be replaced by fhe developer with those types of trees approved by the Director. The replacement trees shal! be of a size and species similar to the trees that are being removed unless lesser sized alternafives are approved by the Director. Response: No existing street trees are being removed therefore this criterion is not applicable. G. Granting of adjustments... Response: There are no adjustments being requested regarding street trees as part of this development application and therefore this criterion is not applicable. H. Location of trees near signalized intersections. The Director may allow trees closer to specified intersections which are signalized, provided the provisions of Chapter 18.795, Visual Clearance, are satisfied. Response: The applicant is not requesting to plant trees closer to any intersections and therefore this criterion is not applicable. 18.745.050 Buffering and Screening 2. Buffering and screening is required to reduce the impacts on adjacent uses which are of a differenf type in accordance with the matrices in this chapter (Tables 18.745.1 and 18.745.2). The owner of each proposed development is responsible for the insta!lation and effective maintenance of buffering and screening. When different uses would be abutting one another except for separation by a right-of-way, buffering, but not screening, shal! be required as specified in the matrix; Response: The proposed fire station is within the R-4.5 zoning district as are all of the uses surrounding it. While Table 18.745.1 does list existing and proposed uses which include single family homes (the dominant use in the area) there is no listing for emergency services. However, on pages two and three of the Pre-Application Conference notes (Exhibit C) buffering and screening are noted to be required along the east property line due to the planned parking area which would abut a residential area. Further the estimated buffering and screening requirement is noted as being between 6 and 10 feet which, according to Table 18.745.2, would translate into buffer combination "C". Table 2-6. Buffering Combinations for Landscaping and Screening Required Buffer Width Trees Shrubs or Screening Combination Options feet er linear feet of buffer Groundcover 1 10 Shrubs 4' Hed e C 2 8 15' min/30' max spacing Shrubs 5' Fence 3 6 Shrubs 6' Wall 3. In Iieu of these sfandards, a detailed buffer area landscaping and screening plan may be submitted for the Director's approval as an alternative to the buffer area landscaping and screening standards, provided it affords the same degree of buffering and screening as required by this code. Section 2: Application Narrative 2'32 Tualatin Valley Fire 8�Rescue Walnut Street Fire Station August 14, 2007 Response: A separate detailed buffer area landscaping and screening plan is not being submitted for the proposed development. B. Buffering and screening requirements. 1. A buffer consists of an area within a required setback adjacent to a property line and having a depth equal to the amount specified in the buffering and screening matrix and confaining a length equal to the length of the property line of the abutting use or uses; Response: The proposed development, as stated above, is required to have a buffer along the eastern property line where the parking area abuts a residential neighborhood. According to Table 18.745.2 (and as excerpted above as Table 2-6), the required buffer combination is "C" and the applicant has chosen option 1 as shown on the provided Landscape Plans (Exhibit E). Additionally, a buffer has been provided along the perimeter of the western parking area. Table 2-7. Proposed Buffering Combination for Landscaping and Screening On-Site Buffer Options W�dth Trees Shrubs or Screening feet er linear feet of buffer Groundcover East Buffer C1 10 20' s acin Shrubs 5' Hed e 2. A buffer area may only be occupied by utilities, screening, sidewalks and bikeways, and landscaping. No buildings, accessways or parking areas shall be allowed in a buffer area except where an accessway has been approved by the City; Response: The applicant understands that the buffer area should only be occupied by utilities, screening, sidewalks and bikeways, and landscaping and as shown on the provided Landscape Plans, the applicant has fulfilled this criterion. 3. A fence, hedge or wall, or any combination of such elements, which are located in any yard is subject to the conditions and requirements of Sections 18.745.050.8.8 and 18.745.050.D; Response: As detailed below, the applicant has fulfilled the conditions and requirements of Section 18.745.050.B.8 and 18.745.050.D. 4. The minimum improvements within a buffer area shall consist of combinations for landscaping and screening as specified in Table 18.745.9. In addition, improvemenfs shall meet the following specifications: a. At least one row of frees shall be planted. They shall have a minimum caliper of two inches at four feet in heighf above grade for deciduous trees and a minimum height of five feet high for evergreen trees at the time of planting. Spacing for trees shall be as follows: (1) Small or narrow-stature trees, under 25 feet tall or less than 16 feet wide af maturity shall be spaced no further than 95 feet apart; (2) Medium-sized trees between 25 feet to 40 feet tall and wifh 16 feet fo 35 feet wide branching at maturity shall be spaced no greater than 30 feet apart; (3) Large trees, over 40 feet tal! and with more than 35 feet wide branching at maturify, shall be spaced no greater than 30 feef apart. Section 2:Application Narrative 2-33 Tualatin Valley Fire& Rescue Walnut Street Fire Station August 14, 2007 Response: As detailed on the Landscape Plans and Planting List (Exhibit E), there are a row of trees being planted along the eastern property line where the parking lot abuts the residential area as required. The trees will be medium sized and will be planted 30' on center. b. In addifion, at leasf 10 five-gallon shrubs or 20 one-ga!!on shrubs shall be planted for each 1,000 square feet of required buffer area; Response: The required buffer along the eastern property line is approximately 1,200 square feet and 36 five-gallon shrubs (Silver King Japanese Euonymus) are being planted which fulfills the requirement listed above. c. The remaining area shall be planted in lawn or other living ground cover. Response: As shown on the provided Landscape Plans, the remaining area is being planted in lawn. 5. Where screening is required the following standards shall apply in addition to those required for buffering: a. A hedge of narrow or broad leaf evergreen shrubs shall be planfed which will form a four-foot continuous screen of the height specified in Table 98.745.2 within two years of planting; or b. An earthen berm planted with evergreen planf materials shall be provided which will form a continuous screen of the heighf specified in Table ?8.745.2 within two years. The unplanted portion of the berm shaJl be planted in lawn or other living ground cover,• or c. A fence or wall of the height specified in Table 18.745.2 shall be constructed to provide a continuous sight obscuring screen. Response: The required screen for the buffer combination chosen dictates that there is a 4' hedge. The shrubs being planted within the eastern buffer will result in a 5' hedge which will fulfill the standard above. 6. Buffering and screening provisions shall be superseded by the vision clearance requirements as set forth in Chapter 18.795; Response: The applicant understands that the buffering and screening provisions can be superseded by the vision clearance requirements. 7. When the use to be screened is downhill from the adjoining zone or use, the prescribed heights of required fences, waUs, or landscape screening shall be measured from fhe actual grade of fhe adjoining property. !n this case, fences and walls may exceed the permitted six foot height at the discretion of the director as a condition of approval. When the grades are so steep so as to make the installation of walls, fences or landscaping to the required height impractical, a detailed landscape/screening plan shall be submitted for approval; Response: The use screened as part of the development is not downhill from the adjoining zone or use and therefore this criterion is not applicable. 8. Fences and walls... Response: Within the required buffer area, there will not be a fence and therefore this criterion is not applicable. Section 2: Application Narrative 2-34 Tualatin Valley Fire 8 Rescue Walnut Street Fire Station August 14, 2007 9. Hedges a. An evergreen hedge or other dense evergreen landscaping may satisfy a requirement for a sight-obscuring fence where required subject fo the heighf requirement in Sections 18.745.050.C.2.a and 18.745.050.C.2.b; b. Such hedge or other dense landscaping shall be properly maintained and shall be replaced wifh another hedge, other dense evergreen landscaping, or a fence when it ceases fo serve the purpose of obscuring view; and c. No hedge shall be grown or maintained at a height greater than that permitted by these regulations for a fence or wall in a vision clearance area as set forth in Chapter 18.795. Response: Within the required buffer area, there will be a hedge which was designed in accordance with the code requirements above and other applicable standards of this development code. The hedge is not intended to satisfy a requirement for a sight-obscuring fence and will not impact any vision clearance areas. Additionally, the hedge will be properly maintained and should it fail, it will be replaced. C. Setbacks for fences or walls... Response: Within the required buffer area, there will not be a fence or wall and therefore this criterion is not applicable. D. Height restrictions. 1. The prescribed heights of required fences, walls or landscaping shall be measured from the actua! adjoining level of finished grade, except fhat where parking, loading, storage or similar areas are located above finished grade, the height of fences, walls or landscaping required to screen such areas or space shall be measured from the level of such improvements; 2. An earthen berm and fence or wal! combination shall nof exceed the six-foot height limitation for screening. Response: Within the required buffer area, there will not be any fences, walls, or berms. All landscaping within the buffers will be measured from the actual adjoining finished grade and meet the applicable height standards of this development code. E. Screening; specia!provisions. 1. Screening and landscaping of parking and loading areas: a. Screening of parking and loading areas is required. The specifications for this screening are as follows: (1) Landscaped parking areas shal! include special desrgn features which etfectively screen the parking lot areas from view. These design feafures may include the use of landscaped berms, decorative walls and raised planters; Response: As part of the required buffer along the eastern property line of the proposed development, where the parking area abuts a residential zone, Option C.1 has been chosen as they type of screening as detailed in the response to code section 18.745.050.6.1 above. Section 2: Application Narrative 2-35 Tualatin Valley Fire& Rescue Walnut Street Fire Station August 14, 2007 � � The parking lot to the west of the proposed structure, which is interior to the site and will not border on a lot line or any differing uses, will also be screened from view with trees and shrubbery as detailed on the Landscape Plans. (2) Landscape planfers may be used to define or screen the appearance of off-streef parking areas from the public right-of-way; Response: Landscape planters are not being used and therefore this criterion is not applicable. (3) Materials to be insta!!ed should achieve a balance between low lying and vertical shrubbery and trees; Response: In designing the landscaped buffers, attention was given to ensuring a balance in the vegetation as required by the code. (4) Trees shall be planted in landscaped islands in all parking areas, and shall be equally distributed and on the basis of one free for each seven parking spaces in order to provide a canopy effecf; and Response: Landscape islands have been located within the parking areas as required (one per every seven spaces), two in the western parking area and one in the eastern. All landscape islands will contain one tree and this is illustrated on the submitted landscape plans. (5) The minimum dimension of the landscape islands shall be three feet and the landscaping shall be protected from vehicular damage by some form of whee!guard or curb. Response: The dimensions of the landscape islands are 8.5' wide and 18.5' long and will be protected from vehicular damage by a curb. 2. Screening of service facilities. Excepf for one-family and two-family dwellings, any refuse container or disposal area and service facilities such as gas meters and air condifioners which would otherwise be visible from a public street, customer or resident parking area, any public facility or any residentia! area shall be screened from view by placement of a solid wood fence or masonry wall between five and eight feet in height. Al! refuse materials shal! be contained within the screened area; Response: As illustrated on the provided Site Plans, the refuse disposal area is being screened from view with a solid wood fence that is 7 feet in height and a shrubbery buffer. the air conditioner is on the roof of the structure and will be screened from view. 3. Screening of swimming pools... Response: There is no swimming pool proposed as part of the fire station and therefore this criterion is not applicable. 4. Screening of refuse containers. Except for one- and two-family dwellings, any refuse container or refuse collecfion area which would be visible from a public street, parking lot, residential or commercial area, or any public facility such as a school or park shall be screened or enclosed from view by placement of a solid wood fence, masonry wa11 or evergreen hedge. All refuse shall be contained wifhin the screened area. Response: The refuse collection area is being screened from view with a solid wood fence that is 7 feet in height and a shrubbery buffer. Section 2: Application Narrative 2-36 Tualatin Valley Fire 8�Rescue Walnut Street Fire Station August 14,2007 � � F. Buffer Matrix. 1. The Buffer Matrices contained in Tables 18.745.1 and 18.745.2 shall be used in calculating widths of buffering/screening and required improvements to be installed between proposed uses and abutting uses or zoning districts; Response: As discussed previously, buffering has been required for the eastern property line of the proposed development where the parking area abuts the residential neighborhood. The Pre-Application Conference notes specified a 6-10 foot buffer and the applicant has chosen to use the standards outlined in 18.745.2 for option C.1 to meet this requirement (see Landscape Plans, Exhibit E). 2. An application for a variance... Response: This proposal does not contain an application for a variance to the buffer standards. 18.745.060 Re-vegetation A. When re-vegetation is required. Where natural vegetation has been removed through grading in areas not affected by the landscaping requirements and that are not to be occupied by structures, such areas are to be replanfed as set forth in this section to prevent erosion after construction activities are completed. Response: Natural vegetation has not been removed through grading in any areas not affected by the landscaping requirements and therefore this section is not applicable. Section 2: Application Narrative 2'3� Tualatin Valley Fire&Rescue Walnut Street Fire Station August 14, 2007 � � Chapter 18.755 MIXED SOLID WASTE AND RECYCLABLE STORAGE 18.755.030 Materials Accepted A. Materials accepted. Except as provided for in 18.755.040 G and l, the storage area must be able to accept at least al! "principle recyclable materials" designated by the Oregon Environmental Quality Commission and other source-separafed recyclable the local government identifies by regulation. Response: The applicant understands that the storage area must be able to accept all "principle recyclable materials" designated by the Oregon Environmental Quality Commission and other source- separated recyclable the local government identifies by regulation. 18.755.040 Methods of Demonstrating Compliance A. Alternative methods of compliance. An applicant shall choose one of the following four methods to demonstrate compliance: 1. Minimum standards; Response: The applicant has chosen method 1 (Minimum Standards) to demonstrate compliance with this Code criteria. 8. Provisions. The following provisions apply to al!four methods of demonstrating compliance: 1. Section 18.755.050, Location, Design and Access Standards, excepf as provided in 18.755.040 G; Response: The requirements and standards in Section 18.755.050, Location, Design and Access Standards have been met within this development application on page 2-40. 2. The floor area of an interior or exterior storage area required by this chapter shall be excluded from the calculation of lot coverage and from the calculation of building floor area for purposes of determining minimum sforage requirements. Response: The applicant understands that the floor area of an interior or exterior storage area should be excluded from the calculation of lot coverage and from the calculation of building floor area for purposes of determining minimum storage requirements. C. Minimum standards method. 1. Description of inefhod: This method specifies a minimum storage area requirement based on the size and general use category of fhe new construction; Response: The applicant understands that this method specifies a minimum storage area requirement based on the size and general use category of the new construction. 2. Typical application of inethod: This method is most appropriate when the specific use of a new building is not known. It provides specific dimensions for the minimum size of storage areas by general use category; Response: The applicant understands that this method is most appropriate when the specific use of a new building is not known and that it will provides specific dimensions for the minimum size of storage Section 2:Application Narrative Z-38 Tualatin Valley Fire&Rescue Walnut Street Fire Station August 14, 2007 � � areas by general use category. While the use of the proposed building is known, this method was the most feasible for determining compliance. 3. Application requirements and review procedure: The size and location of the storage area(s) shall be indicated on fhe sife plan of any construction subject to this ordinance. Through the site plan review process, compliance with the general and specific requirements set forth be/ow is verified; Response: As shown on the provided Site Plan (Exhibit E) the size and location of the storage area has been indicated. 4. General requirements: a. The storage area requirement is based on the predominant use(s) of the building, (i.e. residential, office, retail, wholesale/warehouse/manufacturing, educational/institutional, or ofher). If a building has more fhan one of the uses listed herein and that use occupies 20 percent or less of the floor area of the building, the floor area occupied by fhat use shall be counted toward the floor area of fhe predominant use(s). If a building has more than one of the uses listed herein and that use occupies more than 20% of the floor area of the building, then the storage area requirement for the whole building shall be the sum of the requirement for the area of each use. Response: The applicant understands that the storage area requirement is based on the predominant use of the building which, in this case, is emergency services (fire station). b. Storage areas for multiple uses on a single sife may be combined and shared. Response: The proposed development will have a single use and therefore this criterion is not applicable. c. The specific requirements are based on an assumed storage height of 4 feet for solid wasfe/recyclable. Vertica! storage higher than 4 feet buf no higher than 7 feet may be used to accommodate the same volume of storage in a reduced floor space (potential reduction of 43% of specific requirements). Where vertica! or stacked storage is proposed, the sife plan shall include drawings fo illustrate the layout of the storage area and dimensions of confainers. Response: The storage height for the proposed development will be seven feet as shown on the provided Site Plans. 5. Specific requirements: a. Multi-unit residential buildings... Response: The proposed development is not a multi-unit residential building and there for this criterion is not applicable. b. Non-residential buildings shall provide a minimum storage area of 10 square feet, plus: (5) Other. 4 square feed1,000 square feet GFA. Response: The storage area for the proposed development will be a total of 200 square feet. The use of the proposed development will be a fire station (emergency service use) which falls under the "Other" category listed above and will meet the required area. Section 2: Application Narrative Z'39 Tualatin Valley Fire&Rescue Walnut Street Fire Station August 14,2007 � � D. Wasre assessment method. E. Comprehensive recycling plan method. F. Franchised hauler review mefhod. Response: The applicant has chosen method 1 (Minimum Standards) to demonstrate compliance with this Code chapter and therefore the three Code sections above are not applicable. 18.755.050 Location, Design and Access Standards for Storage Areas A. Applicable standards. The following location, design and access sfandards for storage areas are applicable to aI!four methods of compliance, described in 18.755.040 above. Response: The applicant understands that the standards of this Code section are applicable to all four methods of compliance. B. Location standards. 1. To encourage its use, the storage area for source-separated recyclable shall be co-located with the storage area for residual mixed solid waste; 2. Indoor and outdoor storage areas shall comply with Uniform Building and Fire Code requirements; 3. Storage area space requirements can be satisfied with a single location or multiple locations, and can combine both interior and exterior locations; 4. Exterior storage areas can be located within interior side yard or rear yard areas. Exterior storage areas sha!! not be located within a required front yard setback or in a yard adjacent to a public or private streef; 5. Exterior storage areas shall be located in central and visible locations on a site to enhance security for users; 6. Exterior storage areas can be located in a parking area, if the proposed use provides at least the minimum number of parking spaces required for the use after deducting the area used for storage. Storage areas shall be appropriately screened according to the provisions in 18.755.050 C, design standards; 7. The storage area shall be accessible for collection vehicles and focated so fhaf the storage area will not obstruct pedestrian or vehicle traffic movement on fhe site or on public streets adjacent to the site. Response: The storage area for recyclables and waste will be located together in an outdoor storage area that complies with the Uniform Building and Fire Code requirements in a single exterior location outside of any required setbacks and not adjacent to a street. The storage area will be appropriately screened and will be accessible to collection vehicles as detailed in Exhibit I. C. Design sfandards. 1. The drmensions of the storage area shall accommodate containers consistent with current methods of local collection; Section 2:Application Narrative 2-40 Tualatin Valley Fire 8 Rescue Walnut Street Fire Station August 14, 2007 � � 2. Storage containers shall meet Uniform Fire Code standards and be made and covered wifh waterproof materials or situated in a covered area; 3. Exterior storage areas sha!! be enclosed by a sight-obscuring fence wall, or hedge at least six feet in height. Gate openings which allow access to users and haulers shall be provided. Gate openings for haulers shalf be a minimum of 10 feet wide and shall be capable of being secured in a closed and open position; 4. Storage area(s) and confainers shall be clearly labeled to indicate the type of materials accepted. Response: The storage area has been designed to accommodate containers consistent with current members that will be labeled appropriately and meet Uniform Fire Code standards. The storage area will be at the exterior of the building enclosed by a fence at seven feet in height. Appropriate gate openings will be provided. D. Access standards. 1. Access to storage areas can be limited for securify reasons. However, the storage area shal! be accessible to users at convenient fimes of the day, and to collection service personnel on the day and approximate time they are scheduled to provide co!lection service; 2. Storage areas shall be designed to be easily accessible to collection frucks and equipment, considering paving, grade and vehicle access. A minimum of 10 feet horizontal cfearance and eight feet of vertica!clearance is required if the storage area is covered; 3. Storage areas shall be accessible to collection vehicles without requiring backing out of a driveway onto a public streef. If only a single access point is available to the storage area, adequate turning radius shall be provided to allow collection vehicles to safety exit the site in a forward motion. Response: The storage area will be accessible to users and collection service personnel at the appropriate times and designed to be easily accessible to collection trucks and equipment. Further, the storage area will be designed in such a way that collection vehicles will not need to back out of a driveway onto a street. Section 2:Application Narrative 2"4� Tualatin Valley Fire&Rescue Walnut Street Fire Station August 14, 2007 � � Chapter 18.765 OFF-STREET PARKING AND LOADING REQUIREMENTS 18.765.020 Applicability of Provisions A. New construction. At the time of fhe erection of a new structure within any zoning district, off-street vehicle parking will be provided in accordance with Section 18.765.070. Response: The proposed development is the construction of a new fire station and therefore this Code chapter is applicable. E. Building permit conditions. The provision and maintenance of off-street vehicle parking and loading spaces are the continuing obligation of the property owner: 1. No building or other permit shal! be issued until plans are presented to the Director fo show that property is and will remain available for exclusive use as off-street vehicle parking and loading space; and 2. The subsequent use of property for which the building permit is issued shall be conditional upon the unqualified continuance and availability of the amount of vehicle parking and loading space required by this title; 3. Required vehicle parking shall: a. Be available for the parking of operable passenger vehicles of residents, patron and employees only; b. Not be used for storage of vehicles or materials or for the parking of trucks used in conduct of the business or use; and c. Nof be rented, /eased or assigned to any ofher person or organization. Response: The applicant understands that the provision and maintenance of the off-street vehicle parking areas are their continuing obligation and are subject to the standards of the Tigard Development Code. 18.765.030 General Provisions A. Vehicle parking plan requirements. No building or ofher permit sha!!be issued unti! scaled plans are presented and approved as provided by this chapter that show how access, egress and circulation requirements are to be fulfilled. The applicant shall submit a site plan. The Director shall provide the applicant with detailed information about fhis submission requirement. Response: The required Site Plan has been submitted with this application as part of Exhibit E. B. Location of vehicle parkrng. The location of off-street parking will be as follows: 1. Off-street parking spaces for single-family and duplex dwellings and single-family attached dwellings... Response: The proposal does not contain any single-family or duplex dwellings or any single-family attached dwellings and therefore this Code section is not applicable. Section 2: Application Narrative 2'42 Tualatin Valley Fire& Rescue Walnut Street Fire Station August 14,2007 � � 2. Off-street parking /ofs for uses not listed above shall be located nof further than 500 feet from the property line that they are required to serve, measured along the most direcf, publicly accessible pedestrian route from fhe property line with the fo!lowing exceptions: a. Commercia!and industria!uses... b. The 40 parking spaces which remain on the primary site... Response: As detailed on the provided Site Plan, the off-street parking lots are not further than 500 feet from the property line that they are required to serve, measured along the most direct, publicly accessible pedestrian route from the property line with the following exceptions. C. Joint parking... D. Parking in mixed-use projects... E. Visitor parking in multi-family residential developments... Response: The proposed development does not contain any joint parking, mixed-use projects or multi- family residential developments and therefore the three Code criteria above are not applicable. F. Preferential long-term carpool/vanpoo! parking. Parking lots providing in excess of 20 long-term parking spaces shal! provide preferential long-term carpool and vanpool parking for employees, students and other regular visitors to the site. At least 5% of total long-term parking spaces shall be reserved for carpool/vanpoo! use. Preferential parking for carpools/vanpools shal! be closer to the main entrances of the building than any other employee or student parking except parking spaces designated for use by the disabled. Preferential carpool/vanpoo! spaces shall be ful!-sized per requirements in Section 18.765.040.N and shall be clearly designated for use only by carpools and vanpools between 7:00 AM and 5:30 PM Monday through Friday. Response: Within the two parking areas, there are a total of 39 parking spaces provided and two of those spaces have been designated for use only by carpools and vanpools between 7:00 AM and 5:30 PM Monday through Friday. G. Disabled-accessible parking. All parking areas sha/!be provided wifh the required number of parking spaces for disabled persons as specified by the Sfate of Oregon Uniform Building Code and federal standards. Such parking spaces shaU be sized, signed and marked as required by fhese regulations. Response: The applicant has complied with all federal and state standards in providing the correct number of spaces for disabled persons and has designed and will post those spaces as required. H. DEQ indirect source construcfion permit. All parking lots containing 250 spaces... Response: The parking areas proposed for this development do no contain 250 spaces and therefore this Code criterion is not applicable. 18.765.040 General Design Standards A. Maintenance of parking areas. All parking lots shall be kept clean and in good repair af all times. Breaks in paved surfaces shal! be repaired promptly and broken or splinfered wheel stops shal! be replaced so fhat their function will not be impaired. Response: The applicant understands that all parking lots are to be kept clean and in good repair at all times and breaks in paved surfaces will be repaired promptly and broken or splintered wheel stops shall be replaced so that their function will not be impaired. Section 2:Application Narrative 2-43 Tualatin Valley Fire&Rescue Walnut Street Fire Station August 14, 2007 � � 8. Access drives. With regard to access to public streets from off-street parking: 1. Access drives from the street to off-street parking or loading areas sha!! be designed and constructed to facilitate the flow of traffic and provide maximum safefy for pedestrian and vehicular traffic on the site; 2. The number and size of access drives shall be in accordance with the requirements of Chapter, 18.705, Access, Egress and Circulation; 3. Access drives shall be clearly and permanently marked and defined through use of rails, fences, walls or other barriers or markers on frontage not occupied by service drives; 4. Access drives shall have a minimum vision clearance in accordance with Chapter 18.795, Visual Clearance; 5. Access drives shall be improved with an asphalt or concrete surface; and 6. Excluding single-family and duplex residences, except as provided by Subsection 18.810.030P, groups of two or more parking spaces shall be served by a service drive so that no backing movements or other maneuvering within a streef or other public right-of-way will be required. Response: The driveways for the proposed fire station have been designed to safely facilitate the flow of traffic while maintaining safety for other vehicles and pedestrians. The driveways will be concrete from the curb to the back of the sidewalk and then asphalt, except for the apparatus driveway which will be all concrete. All driveways will be marked as required by the applicable regulations and standards of this development code and have been designed to meet the minimum vision clearance and maneuvering requirements. As previously discussed in this application, the driveways are not spaced as required and the applicant is requesting an adjustment to this standard pursuant to Section 18.370.020.C.5 (see page 2-13 of this application). The site's driveway spacing is also discussed in more detail within Exhibit F, Traffic Impact Analysis and Adjustment Memorandum, of this application. C. Loading/unloading driveways. A driveway designed for continuous forward flow of passenger vehicles for the purpose of loading and unloading passengers shall be located on the site of any school or other meeting place which is designed to accommodate more than 25 people at one time. D. On-site vehicle stacking for drive-in use. Response: There are no loading or unloading driveways or drive-ins proposed for this development and therefore the two criteria above are not applicable. E. Curb cuts. Curb cuts shall be in accordance with Secfion 18.890.030.N. Response: All curb cuts were designed in accordance with Section 18.810.030.N. F. Pedestrian access. Pedestrian access fhrough parking lots shall be provided in accordance with Section 18.705.030.F. Where a parking area or other vehicle area has a drop-off grade separation, the property owner shall install a wall, railing, or other barrier which will prevent a slow-moving vehicle or driverless vehicle from escaping such area and which wil!prevent pedestrians from walking over drop- off edges. Response: All pedestrian access through the parking areas were designed in accordance with Section 18.705.030.F. Additionally, there is no drop-off grade separation within either of the parking areas. Section 2: Application Narrative 2-44 Tualatin Valley Fire 8 Rescue Walnut Street Fire Station August 14, 2007 � � G. Parking !ot landscaping. Parking lots shal! be landscaped in accordance with the requiremenfs of Chapter 98.745. Response: The parking areas will be landscaped in accordance with the requirements of Chapter 18.745 as detailed on the Landscape Plans (Exhibit E). H. Parking space surfacing. 9. Except for single-family and duplex residences, and for temporary uses or fleet storage areas as authorized in 18.765.040.H.3 and 4 below, a/!areas used for the parking or storage or maneuvering of any vehicle, boat or trailer sha!!be improved with asphalt or concrefe surfaces; Response: The parking areas for the proposed fire station will be improved with asphalt as detailed on the provided Site Plans. l. Parking lot sfriping. 1. Except for single-family and duplex residences, any area intended to be used to meet the off- sfreet parking requirements as contained in this chapter shall have all parking spaces clearly marked; and 2. All inferior drives and access aisles shall be clearly marked and signed to show direction of flow and maintain vehicular and pedestrian safety. Response: All parking spaces, interior drives and access aisles will be clearly marked and all drives and access aisles will be properly signed to show direction and maintain safety. J. Wheel stops. Parking spaces along the boundaries of a parking !ot or adjacent to interior landscaped areas or sidewalks shaU be provided with a whee!stop at least four inches high located three feet back from the front of the parking sfall. The front three feet of fhe parking sta!! may be concrete, asphalt or low lying landscape maferial that does not exceed the height of the wheel stop. This area cannot be calculated to meet landscaping or sidewalk requirements. Response: Wheel stops have been provided to each parking space as required and as detailed on the Site Plans. K. Drainage. Off-street parking and loading areas sha!! be drained in accordance with specifications approved by the City Engineer to ensure that ponds do not occur except for single-family and duplex residences; off-street parking and loading facilities shall be drained to avoid flow of water across public sidewalks. Response: All off-street parking areas will be drained to ensure that ponds do not occur. Drainage plans can be found within this development application as part of Exhibit E. L. Lighting. A lighfs providing to illuminate any public or private parking area or vehicle sales area shall be arranged to direct the light away from any adjacent residential district. Response: As detailed on the attached Lighting Plan (Exhibit E) all lights within the parking areas have been arranged to direct the light away from adjacent residential districts. M. Signs. Signs which are placed on parking lots shall be designed and installed in accordance with Chapter 18.780, Signs. Section 2: Application Narrative 2-45 Tualatin Valley Fire 8�Rescue Walnut Street Fire Station August 14, 2007 � � Response: There are no signs associated with this development which are being placed within the parking areas and therefore this Code criterion is not applicable. N. Space and aisle dimensions. (Figure 18.765.1) 1. Except as modified for angled parking in Figures 18.765.1 and 18.765.2, the minimum dimensions for parking spaces are: a. 8.5'x 18.5'for a standard space; b. 7.5'x 16.5'for a compact space; and c. As required by applicable State of Oregon and federal standards for designated disabled person parking spaces; d. The width of each parking space includes a stripe which separates each space. 2. Aisles accommodafing two direction traffic, or allowing access from both ends, shall be 24 feet in width; 3. Minimum standards for a standard parking stall's length and width, aisle width, and maneuvering space shall be determined as noted in Figure 18.765.2. Table 2-8. Off-Street Surface Parkinq Standards Tigard Development Code Standards (Figure 18.765.1) A B C D E F G 90 Degrees 8.5 18.5 28.0 8.50 65.0 3.0 9.0 18.5 26.0 9.00 63.0 3.0 9.5 18.5 25.0 9.50 62.0 3.0 10.0 18.5 24.0 10.0 61.0 3.0 Pro osed Parkin Dimensions East Parking 8.5 18.5 N/A 8.5 48.5 3.0 Area West Parking 9.0 (3 18.5 24.0 9.0 61.0 3.0 Area s aces 8.5 (11 18.5 24.0 8.5 61.0 3.0 s aces 18.765.050 Bicycle Parking Design Standards A. Location and access. With regard to the location and access to bicycle parking: 1. Bicycle parking areas shal! be provided at locations within 50 feef of primary entrances to structures; 2. 8icycle parking areas shall not be located within parking aisles, landscape areas or pedestrian ways; 3. Outdoor bicycle parking shall be visible from on-site buildings and/or the street. When the bicycle parking area is not visible from the street, directional signs shall be used to located the parking area; Section 2: Application Narrative 2-46 Tualatin Valley Fire& Rescue Walnut Street Fire Station August 14, 2007 � � 4. Bicycle parking may be located inside a building on a floor which has an outdoor entrance open for use and floor location which does nof require the bicyclisf to use sfairs to gain access to the space. Exceptions may be made fo the latfer requirement for parking on upper sfories within a multi-story residenfial building. Response: The bicycle parking proposed for this development has been provided within 50 feet of the primary entrances to the building and outside of the building, parking aisles, landscaped areas and pedestrian ways. Additionally, the bicycle parking is visible from the street and is illustrated on the attached Site Plans. 8. Covered parking spaces. 9. When possible, bicycle parking facilities should be provided under cover. Response: The required bicycle parking facilities are provided under cover. C. Design requirements. The following design requirements apply to the installation of bicycle racks: 1. The racks required for required bicycle parking spaces shall ensure that bicycles may be securely locked ro fhem without undue inconvenience. Provision of bicycle lockers for long-term (employee) parking is encouraged but not required; 2. Bicycle racks must be securely anchored to the ground, wall or other structure; 3. Bicycle parking spaces shall be at least 2% feet by six feet long, and, when covered, with a vertical clearance of seven feet. An access aisle of at least five feet wide shall be provided and maintained beside or between each row of bicycle parking; 4. Each required bicycle parking space must be accessible without moving another bicycle; 5. Required bicycle parking spaces may not be renfed or leased except where required motor vehicle parking is rented or leased. At-cost or deposit fees for bicycle parking are exempt from this requirement; 6. Areas set aside for required bicycle parking must be clearly reserved for bicycle parking only. Response: The bicycle racks will be installed as detailed on the submitted Floor Plan (Exhibit E). The racks will be bolted to the concrete sidewalk, spaced as dictated by the applicable code standards and secure D. Paving. Outdoor bicycle parking facilities shal! be surfaced with a hard surfaced material, i.e., pavers, asphalt, concrete or similar material. This surface must be designed to remain well-drained. Response: The bicycle parking facilities will be paved with concrete and has been designed to drain well. E. Minimum bicycle parking requirements. The total number of required bicycle parking spaces for each use is specified in Table 18.768.2 in Section 18.765.070.H. !n no case shall there be less than two bicycle parking spaces. Single-family residences and duplexes are excluded from the bicycle parking requirements. The Director may reduce the number of required bicycle parking spaces by means of an adjusfinenf to be reviewed through a Type ll procedure, as governed by Section ?8.390.040, using approval criteria contained in Section 18.370.020.C.5.e. Section 2: Application Narrative 2�� Tualatin Valley Fire& Rescue Walnut Street Fire Station August 14, 2007 � � Response: As detailed in Table 2-9 of this development application and illustrated on the provided Site Plans, six bicycle parking spaces have been provided for the proposed development as required by this Code chapter. 18.765.060 Parking Structure Design Standards... Response: There is no parking structure proposed for this development and therefore this Code section is not applicable. 18.765.070 Minimum and Maximum Off-Street Parking Requirements A. Parking requirements for unlisted uses. Response: The proposed fire station is an Emergency Services use which is listed and therefore this Code criterion is not applicable. B. Choice of parking requirements. When a building or use is planned or constructed in such a manner that a choice of parking requiremenfs could be made, the use which requires the greater number of parking spaces shall govern. Response: The proposed development does not contain more than one use and therefore this criterion is not applicable. C. Measurements. The following measuremenfs shall be used in calculating the fotal minimum number of vehicle parking spaces required in Section 18.765.070.H: 1. Fractions. Fractional space requirements shall be counted as a whole space; 2. Employees. Where employees are specified for the purpose of determining the minimum vehicle parking spaces required, the employees counted are those who work on the premises during fhe largesf shift at the peak season; 3. Students. When sfudents are specified for the purpose of determining the minimum vehicle parking spaces required, the students counted are those who are on the campus during the peak period of fhe day during a typica!school term; 4. Space. Unless otherwise specified, where square feet are specified, fhe area measured shall be gross floor area under fhe roof ineasured from the faces of fhe sfructure, excluding only space devoted to covered off-street parking or loading. Response: The parking areas for the proposed development have been designed and sited in such a way as to comply with all applicable Code requirements in this chapter including those criteria listed above. D. Exclusions to minimum vehicle parking requiremenfs... E. Exceptions to maximum parking standards... F. Reductions in minimum required vehicle parking... G. /ncreases in maximum required vehicle parking. Response: The applicant is not requesting any exclusions, exceptions, reductions or increases to the required parking and therefore the four Code sections are not applicable. H. Specific requirements. (See Table 18.765.2) Section 2: Application Narrative 2�8 Tualatin Valley Fire 8�Rescue Wafnut Street Fire Station August 14,2007 � � Response: As detailed in Table 2-9 below, the proposed development will meet the requirements specified in Table 18.765.2. Table 2-9 Required Off-Street Vehicle and Bicvcle Parkinq Spaces Emergency Services Minimum Maximum* Zone B Bic cle Ti ard Develo ment Code Standards Fi ure 18.765.2 33 spaces (3.0 50 (4.5 spaces/1,000 6 (0.5 spaces/1,000 sq. s aces/1,000 s . ft. s . ft. ft. Pro osed Develo ment 11,380 s uare feet 39 spaces, including: 6 spaces . 2 CarpoolNanpool Spaces • 2 Disabled-Accessible Parking • 0 Com act S aces 'Per TDC Code Section 18.765.070.C.1,all fractional s aces were counted as a whole s ace. 18.765.080 Off-Street Loading Requirements A. Off-street loading spaces. Commercial, industrial and institutiona! buildings or structures to be built or altered which receive and distribute material or merchandise by truck shall provide and maintain off- street loading and maneuvering space... B. Off-street loading dimensions... Response: The proposed development is not a commercial, industrial or institutional building or structure that requires any off-street loading spaces and therefore this Code section is not applicable. Section 2: Application Narrative 2-49 Tualatin Valley Fire&Rescue Walnut Street Fire 5tation August 14, 2007 � � Chapter 18.775 SENSITIVE LANDS 18.775.020 Applicability of Uses: Permitted, Prohibited, and Nonconforming A. CWS Stormwater Connection Permit. All proposed "development', must obtain a Stormwater Connection Permit from CWS pursuant to its "Design and Construction Sfandards". As used in this chapter, the meaning of the word "development" shall be as defined in the CWS "Design and Construction Standards": All human-induced changes to improved or unimproved real property including: 1. Construction of sfructures requiring a buildrng permit, if such sfructures are external to existing strucfures; 5. Grading; 7. Paving; Response: The proposed development will require a CWS Stormwater Connection Permit because it includes the construction of a structure (the fire station) which requires a building permit and because the project includes grading and paving. The permit has been received and can be found as part of Exhibit B. B. Outright permitted uses with no permit required. C. Exemptions Response: The two code sections above are not applicable because the site is not a jurisdictional wetland, a permit is required for the development and no exemptions are being sought at this time. D. Jurisdictional wetlands. Landform alterations or developments which are only within wetland areas that meet the jurisdictional requirements and permit criferia of the U.S. Army Corps of Engineers, Division of State Lands, CWS, and/or other federal, state, or regiona!agencies, and are nof designated as significant weflands on the City of Tigard "Wetland and Streams Corridors Map'; do nof require a sensitive lands permif. The City shall require that all necessary permits from other agencies are obtained. All other applicable City requirements must be satisfied, includrng sensitive land permits for areas within the 900-year floodplain, slopes of 25% or greafer or unsfable ground, drainage ways, and wetlands which are not under state or federal jurisdiction. Response: Wetlands under the jurisdiction of the US Army Corps of Engineers and the Oregon Department of State Lands were delineated adjacent to Krueger Creek, which flows from the southwest to the northeast along the north side of the property (see Natural Resource Assessment Report, Exhibit J, which includes the delineation report). The wetland is identified as Wetland A-10 on the City of Tigard wetland inventory and is shown as a Significant Wetland on the City of Tigard "Wetland and Streams Corridors Map". A sensitive lands permit will be required for the project because a stormwater outfall pipe will be constructed across the wetland. F. Sensitive lands permits issued by fhe Director. 9. The Director shal! have the authority to issue a sensitive lands permit in the following areas by means of a Type 11 procedure, as governed in Section 98.390.040, using approval criteria confained in Section 18.775.070: Section 2:Application Narrative 2-50 Tualatin Valley Fire 8�Rescue Walnut Street Fire Station August 14, 2007 � � c. Wefland areas which are not regulated by other local, state, or federal agencies and are designafed as significant wetlands on the City of Tigard"Wefland and Streams Corridors Map". 2. Sensitive lands permits shall be required for the areas in Section 18.775.020.F.1 above when any of the following circumstances apply: a. Ground disturbance(s) or land form alterations involving more than 50 cubic yards of material; c. Residential and non-residenfial strucfures intended for human habitation Response: This project requires a Type II Sensitive Lands Review because it has been designated on the City of Tigard's "Wetland and Streams Corridors Map" as significant and there will be a ground disturbance or land form alteration involving more than 50 cubic yards of material and because a non- residential structure (the fire station) is being constructed which is intended for human habitation. 18.775.030 Administrative Provisions A. Interagency Coordination. The appropriate approva! authority shall review all sensitive lands permit applications to determine that all necessary permifs shall be obtained from those federal, state, or local governmenta!agencies from which prior approval is also required. 1. As governed by CWS "Design and Construction Standards'; the necessary permits for al! "development'; as defined in Section 18.775.020.A above, shall include a CWS Service Provider Letter, which specifies the conditions and requirements necessary, if any, for an applicant to comply with CWS water quality protection sfandards and for the Agency to issue a Stormwater Connection Permit. Response: The applicant has applied for and received both a CWS Service Provider Letter and a Stormwater Connection Permit. Copies of each can be found in Exhibit B of this application. B. Alteration or relocation of water course. Response: This project is not altering or relocating a water course and therefore this criterion is not applicable. C. Apply Standards. The appropriate approva! authority shal! apply the standards set forth in Sections 18.775.040, and 98.775.070 when reviewing an application for a sensitive lands permit. Response: The applicant understands that the appropriate approval authority will apply the standards set forth in Sections 18.775.040, and 18.775.070 when reviewing an application for a sensitive lands permit. D. Elevation and flood-proofing certification... E. Maintenance of records... Response: There is no floodplain located on the development site and therefore these code sections are not applicable. 18.775.050 General Provisions for Wetlands A. Code compliance requirements. Wetland regulations apply to those areas classified as significant on the City of Tigard "Wetland and Streams Corridors Map'; and fo a vegetated corridor ranging from 25 fo 200 feet wide, measured horizontally, from the defined boundaries of the wetland, per "Table 3.1 Section 2: Application Narrative 2-51 Tualatin Valley Fire&Rescue Walnut Street Fire Station August 14, 2007 � � Vegetated Corridor Widths" and `Appendix C" Natura! Resource Assessments" of the CWS "Design and Construction Standards". Wetland locafions may include but are not limited to those areas identified as wetlands in "Wetland Inventory and Assessmenf for the City of Tigard, Oregon,"Fishman Environmental Services, 9994. Response: A significant wetland, as noted on the City of Tigard's "Wetland and Streams Corridors Map" and vegetated corridor is located on-site. A stormwater outfall pipe will be constructed across the wetland and vegetated corridor to a discharge point on Krueger Creek. There will be no other development or construction within the wetland area or the vegetated corridor as part of this project. B. Delineation of wetland boundaries. Precise boundaries may vary from those shown on wetland maps; specific delineation of wetland boundaries may be necessary. Wetland delineation will be done by qualified professionals at the applicant's expense. Response: A wetland delineation has been submitted with this application as part of Exhibit J. 18.775.070 Sensitive Land Permits A. Permits required. An applicant who wishes to develop within a sensitive area, as defined in Chapter 18.775, must obtain a permit in certain situafions. Depending on the nature and intensify of the proposed activity wifhin a sensitive area, either a Type ll or Type ll!permit is required, as delineated in Sections 18.775.020.F and 18.775.020.G. The approva! criteria for various kinds of sensifive areas, e.g., floodplain, are presented in Sections 18.775.070.8— 18.775.070.E below. Response: The applicant is applying for a Type II Sensitive Area Review and has addressed the criteria under 18.775.070.E below. E. Within wetlands. The Director shall approve, approve with conditions or deny an application request for a sensitive lands permit within wetlands based upon findings that a!! of the following criteria have been satisfied: 9. The proposed land form alteration or development is neither on wetland in an area designated as significant wetland on the Comprehensive Plan Floodplain and Wetland Map nor is within the vegetative corridor established per "Table 3.1 Vegetative Corridor Widths"and Appendix C: Natural Resources Assessments"of the CWS "Design and Construction Standards'; for such a wetland; Response: The stormwater will be collected by catch basins and routed to a 100' vegetated bioswale for water quality treatment and detention before being released into the wetland buffer and flowing overland into Krueger Creek. This project does not propose any land form alteration or development within the area designated as a significant wetland. 2. The extent and nature of the proposed land form alteration or development will not create site disturbances to an extent greater than the minimum required for the use; Response: As described above the stormwater will be collected and treated before being released into the wetland buffer and flowing overland into Krueger Creek. Any land form alteration or development will fall outside of the designated significant wetl2nd and will not create site c+isturbances. 3. Any encroachment or change in on-site or off-sife drainage which would adversely impact wetland characteristics have been mitigated; Response: The area within the vegetated corridor that is disturbed to construct the stormwater outfall pipe will be restored after construction in complete. Section 2: Application Narrative 2-52 Tualatin Valley Fire& Rescue Walnut Street Fire Station August 14, 2007 Revised � � 4. Where natural vegetation has been removed due to land form alteration or development, erosion control provisions of the Surface Water Management program of Washington County must be met and areas not covered by sfructures or impervious surfaces will be replanted in like or similar species in accordance wifh Chapter 18.745, Landscaping and Screening; Response: As previously stated, the area within the vegetated corridor that is disturbed to construct the stormwater outfall pipe will be restored after construction is complete. Additionally, the outfall pipe will be constructed in an area that will not require removing any woody vegetation. 5. All other sensitive lands requiremenfs of this chapter have been met; Response: All of the other applicable sensitive lands requirements of this chapter have been met. 6. The necessary U.S. Army Corps of Engineers and State of Oregon Land Board, Division of State Lands, and CWS approvals shall be obtained; Response: All necessary permits have been received and have been submitted with this application as part of Exhibit B. 7. The provisions of Chapter 18.790, Tree Removal, shall be met; Response: As detailed on page 2-58 through 2-60 of this application, the provisions of Chapter 18.790, Tree Removal, have been met. 8. Physical Limitations and Nafural Hazards, Floodplains and Wetlands, Natura!Areas, and Parks, Recreation and Open Space policies of the Comprehensive Plan have been satisfied. Response: The applicant has reviewed the policies of the Tigard Comprehensive Plan that relate to Wetlands and believe those policies have been satisfied. 18.775.080 Application Submission Requirements A. Application submission requirements. All applications for uses and activities identified in Sections 18.775.020.A — 18.775.020.G shall be made on forms provided by the Director and must include the following information in graphic, tabular and/or narrative form. The specific informafion on each of the following is available from the Director: 1. A CWS Stormwater Connection permit; 2. A site plan; 3. A grading plan; and 4. A landscaping plan. Response: The renuired plans and permits have been included with th�s application. The require�i plans can be found in Exhibit E and the permits in Exhibit B. 18.775.090 Special Provisions for Development within Locally Significant Wetlands and Along the Tualatin River, Fanno Creek, Ball Creek, and South Fork of Ash Creek... Section 2: Application Narrative 2-53 Tualatin Valley Fire& Rescue Walnut Street Fire Station August 14, 2007 Revised � i Response: The significant wetland on-site is adjacent to Krueger Creek, a portion of which is also on- site, and is not adjacent to the Tualatin River, Fanno Creek, Ball Creek or the South Fork of Ash Creek and therefore this code section is not applicable. 18.775.100 Adjustments to Underlying Zone Setback Standards... 18.775.110 Density Transfer... 18.775.120 Variances to Section 18.775.090 Standards... 18.775.130 Plan Amendment Option... Response: The applicant is not requesting an adjustment to underlying zone setback standards, density transfers, variances or plan amendments and therefore the code sections above are not applicable. Section 2: Application Narrative 2-54 Tualatin Valley Fire& Rescue Walnut Street Fire Station August 14,2007 � � Chapter 18.780 SiGNS 18.780.020 Permits Required A. Comp/iance with regulations. No sign or sign structure shall hereafter be erected, re-erected, construcfed, structurally altered or relocated within the City limits excepf as provided by fhis fitle, and a permit for the same sign or sign structure has been issued by the Director. 8. Separate permits for each sign. A separate permit shall be required for each sign or signs for each business entity and a separate permit shall be required for each group of signs on a single supporting sfructure. C. Compliance with UBC. Separate structural permits under the Uniform Building Code shall also apply. D. Electrical permit required. An electrical permit shall be obtained for all illuminated signs, from the enforcing agency subjecf to fhe provisions of the Stafe Electrical Code. E. Retroactive sign permifs. The Director may require application for sign permits for all signage at a given address if no existing permits previously had been approved or documented. Response: The fire station being proposed by this development application has one new sign being located on site that has been designed to meet the standards and regulations of this development code. A sign permit is needed for this sign, and any necessary building or electrical permits will be obtained. A retroactive sign permit is not being requested. 18.780.030 Permit Approval Process A. Permits for existing signs. Permits for modification of existing signs, or to legalize signs for which a permit was nof obtained when it was constructed, will be processed by means of a Type I procedure, as governed by Section 18.390.030, using the requirements of this chapter as approva!criteria. 8. Permits for new signs. Permits for new signs will be processed by means of a Type 1 procedure, as governed by Section 18.390.030, using the requirements of this chapter as approval criteria. C. Site plan. The applicant shall submit a proposed sign sife plan. The Director shall provide the applicant wifh detailed information about fhis submission requirement. Response: A new sign is being proposed as part of the fire station development and a site plan (Exhibit E) has been provided as part of this application. 18.780.060 Permit Exemptions... 18.780.070 Certain Signs Prohibited... Response: The sign proposed for the fire station is not prohibited per the Tigard Development Code nor is an exemption being requested therefore these code sections are not applicable. 18.780.080 Sign Illumination A. Surface brightness. The surface brightness of any sign shall not exceed that produced by the diffused output obtained from 800 milliampere fluorescent light sources spaced not closer than eight inches, center on center. Section 2:Application Narrative 2-55 Tualatin Valley Fire& Rescue Walnut Street Fire Station August 14, 2007 � � B. No exposed incandescent Iamps. Any exposed incandescent lamp which exceeds 25 watts shal! not be used on the exterior surface of any sign so as to expose the face of such bulb or lamp fo any public sfreef or public right-of-way with the excepfion of electronic information signs. Response: The proposed sign is being lit by two ground mounted lights which are detailed and shown on the provided Lighting Plan (Exhibit E). 18.780.085 Sign Measurement A. Projecting and freestanding signs. 1. The area of a freestanding or projecting sign shall include all sign faces counted in calculating its area. Regardless of the number of sign cabinefs or sign faces, the fotal allowable area shall not be exceeded; 2. The area of the sign shall be measured as follows if the sign is composed of one or more individual cabinets or sides: a. The area around and enclosing the perimefer of each cabinef, sign face or module sha!! be summed and then fotaled to determine total area. The perimeter of ineasurable area shall not include embe!lishments such as pole covers, framing and decorafive roofing, provided there is no written advertising copy, symbols or logos on such embellishments; b. If the sign is composed of more fhan two sign cabinets, sign facia or modules, the area enclosing the entire perimeter of al! cabinefs and/or modules within a single, confinuous geometric figure shal!be fhe area of the sign. Pole covers and other embellishments shall not be included in the area of the sign measuremenf if they do not bear written advertising copy, symbols or logos; and c. The overall height of a freestanding sign or sign structure is measured from the grade directly below the sign to the highest point of the sign or sign structure and shall include architectural and structural embellishmenfs. Response: The area of the freestanding sign proposed is 16.5 square feet per sign face (33 square feet total). The height of the sign is three feet, four inches and has been measured as detailed in the code section above. �18.780.090 Special Condition Signs 18.780.100 Temporary Signs 18.780.110 Nonconforming Signs 18.780.120 Sign Removal Provisions: Nonconforming and Abandoned Signs 18.780.130 Zoning District Regulations A. In the R-7, R-4.5, R-3.5, R-2 and R-1 zones. No sign of any character shal! be permitted in an R-7, R-4.5, R-3.5, R-2 or R-1 zone except the following: 1. WaU sign(s) may nof exceed a combined total area of four square feet; 2. Every housing complex... 3. Every platted subdivision... Response: The proposed development is a fire station which contains no residential development or wall signs and therefore, these criteria are not applicable. Section 2:Application Narrative 2-56 Tualatin Valley Fire 8�Rescue Walnut Street Fire Station August 14, 2007 � � 4. For non-residential uses, one i!luminated or non-illuminated freestanding sign not exceeding six feet in height and 32 square feet in area per sign face for uses approved under fhe site development review or conditional use process will be permitted. Wall signs may not exceed five percent of the gross area of the wa11 face on which the sign is mounted; Response: The applicant is requesting approval for one freestanding illuminated sign which is three feet, four inches in height and 16.5 square feet per sign face. A detailed drawing of the sign can be found on the Site Plan Details sheet (Exhibit E). This request is part of the conditional use application for the fire station development and meets the requirements laid out in this code section. 5. Directional signs on private property when such signs are solely designed to identify driveway entrances and exifs for motorists on adjoining public streets wi!!be permitted. One sign wifh an area of four square feet per face shall be permitted per driveway. Such signs shall be consistent with Chapfer 18.795, Visual Clearance Areas; Response: Directional signs on the site will be solely for identifying driveways entrances and exits and will conform to the applicable code regulations and standards. 6. The signs specified in Section 18.780.060A shall be allowed, subject fo any restrictions imposed by fhis tifle; 7. Temporary Signs in accordance with Sections 18.780.090 and 18.780.100; 8. Lawn signs in accordance with Sections 18.780.060 A.1, A.6, and 8.2; 9. Special condition signs in accordance with Section 18.780.090; and 90. Additiona!permitted sign include awning sign(s) and painfed wall sign(s). Response: No signs other than that described in response to criterion number five above are being requested and therefore these code criteria are not applicable. 18.780.140 Sign Code Adjustments... Response: There are no sign code adjustments being requested as part of this development application and therefore this code section is not applicable. Section 2:Application Narrative 2'S� Tualatin Valley Fire&Rescue Walnut Street Fire Station August 14, 20o7 � � Chapter 18.790 TREE REMOVAL C. Recognize need for exceptions. The City recognizes that, notwithstanding these purposes, at the time of development it may be necessary to remove certain trees in order to accommodate sfructures, streefs utilities, and other needed or required improvements within the development. Response: There is no request for exception to the Tree Removal standards as part of this development application. 18.790.030 Tree Plan Requirement A. Tree plan required. A tree plan for the planfing, removal and protection of trees prepared by a certified arborist shall be provided for any lof, parcel or combination of lots or parcels for which a development application for a subdivision, partition, site development review, planned development or conditional use is filed. Protection is preferred over removal wherever possible. Response: The required tree plan illustrating the removal and protection of trees has been submitted with this application as part of the Arborist Report (Exhibit G) and the trees being planted are illustrated on the Landscape Plan in Exhibit E. 8. Plan requiremenfs. The free plan shall include the following: 1. ldentification of fhe location, size and species of all exisfing trees including trees designated as significant by the city; 2. Idenfification of a program to save existing frees or mitigate tree removal over 12 inches in caliper. Mitigation must follow the replacement guidelines of Section 18.790.060D, in accordance wifh the following standards and shall be exclusive of trees required by ofher development code provisions for landscaping, streets and parking lots: a. Retention of less than 25% of existing trees over 12 inches in caliper requires a mitigation program in accordance wifh Section 18.790.060D of no net foss of trees; b. Refention of from 25% to 50% of existing trees over 12 inches in caliper requires that two fhirds of the trees to be removed be mitigated in accordance with Section 98.790.060D; c. Retention of from 50% to 75% of existing trees over 12 inches in caliper requires that 50 percent of the trees to be removed be mitigated in accordance with Section 18.790.060D; d. Retention of 75% or greater of existing trees over 12 inches in caliper requires no mitigation. 3. Identification of all trees which are proposed to be removed; 4. A protection program defining standards and methods that wil!be used by the applicant to protect trees during and after construction. Response: All trees located on the proposed site have been identified as required on the provided Tree Plan, only one of six trees over 12 inches in caliper are being removed. Tree number 17, a Oregon Myrtle, 25" dbh, is being removed due to the construction of the western parking area and is equal to 16.7% of the trees over 12" dbh on site. Over 75% of the trees over 12" dbh on site are being retained and therefore no mitigation is required. Tree number 2 will also need to be removed given its proximity to the western parking area. This tree is 12 inches in caliper but not over and therefore no Section 2: Application Narrative 2'58 Tualatin Valley Fire& Rescue Walnut Street Fire Station August 14, 2007 � � mitigation will be required. Additionally all trees being removed have been illustrated with an "X" over them on the submitted Tree Plan (Exhibit G). Trees to remain on site will be protected as described in the Arborist Report. The necessary tree removals are also discussed in further detail in the Arborist Report (Exhibit G). C. Subsequenf tree removal. Trees removed within the period of one year prior fo a development application listed above will be inventoried as part of the tree plan above and will be replaced according to Section 18.790.060D. Response: The applicant understands that any trees removed within a one year period prior to this development application will be inventoried and mitigated as part of the tree plan. 18.790.040 Incentives for Tree Retention A. lncenfives. To assist in the preservafion and retention of existing trees, the Director may apply one or more of the following incentives as part of development review approval and the provisions of a tree plan according to Section 18.790.030: 1. Density bonus. For each 2% of canopy cover provided by existing frees over 12 inches in caliper fhat are preserved and incorporated into a development plan, a 1% bonus may be applied to density computations of Chapter 18.795. No more than a 20% bonus may be granted for any one development. The percentage density bonus shall be applied to the number of dwelling units allowed in the underlying zone. This bonus is not applicable to trees preserved in areas of floodplain, slopes greater than 25%, drainage ways, or wetlands that would otherwise be precluded from development; 2. Lot size averaging. To retain exisfing trees over 12 inches in caliper in the development plan for any land division under Chapter 18.400, lot size may be averaged to allow lots /ess than the minimum lot size allowed by the underlying zone as long as the average lof area for all lots and private open space is nof less than that allowed by the underlying zone. No lot area shall be less than 80% of the minimum lot size allowed in the zone; 3. Lot widfh and depth. To retain existing trees over 12 inches in caliper in the developmenf plan for any land division under Chapter 98.400, lot widfh and lot depth may be reduced up to 20% of that required by the underlying zone; 4. Commercial/industria!/civic use parking. For each 2% of canopy cover provided by existing trees over 12 inches in caliper that are preserved and incorporated info a development plan for commercial, industria!or civic uses listed in Section 98.765.080, Minimum and Maximum Off-Street Parking Requirements, a 1% reduction in the amounf of required parking may be granted. No more than a 20% reduction in the required amount of parking may be granted for any one development; 5. Commercial/industrial/civic use landscaping. For each 2% of canopy cover provided by existing trees over 12 inches in caliper that are preserved and incorporated into a development plan, a 1% reduction in the required amount of landscaping may be granted. No more than 20% of the required amount of landscaping may be reduced for any one development. Response: The applicant understands that to assist in the preservation and retention of existing trees, the Director may apply one or more of the above incentives as applicable as part of development review approval. 8. Subsequent removal of a tree. Any tree preserved or retained in accordance with this section may thereafter be removed only for the reasons set out in a tree plan, in accordance with Section Section 2:Application Narrative 2-59 Tualatin Valley Fire& Rescue Walnut Street Fire Station August 14, 2007 � � 18.790.030, or as a condition of approval for a conditional use, and sha!! not be subject to removal under any other section of this chapter. The property owner shall record a deed resfriction as a condition of approval of any development permit affected by this section fo the effect fhat such tree may be removed only if the tree dies or is hazardous according to a certified arborist. The deed restriction may be removed or will be considered invalid if a tree preserved in accordance with fhis section should either die or be removed as a hazardous tree. The form of this deed restriction shall be subject to approval by the Director. Response: Should any trees subsequently need to be removed; the applicant will follow all applicable standards and requirements. 18.790.050 Permit Applicability A. Remova! permit required. Tree removal permits shall be required only for the removal of any tree which is located on or in a sensitive land area as defined by Chapter 18.775... Response: The tree being removed from the site is not located within or on a sensitive land area and therefore this code section is not applicable. 18.790.060 Illegal Tree Removal A. Violations... B. Remedies... C. Fines... Response: As noted in the response to code section 18.790.030.B only one tree is being removed from the site, due to the placement of the western parking area and does not require any mitigation per that same code section. D. Guidelines for replacement... E. In lieu-of payment... Response: As previously stated, the tree being removed is number 17, a Oregon Myrtle, 25" dbh, and is being removed due to the construction of the western parking area. The tree is equal to 16.7% of the trees over 12" dbh on site. Over 75% of the trees over 12" dbh on site are being retained and therefore no mitigation, replacement or in lieu-of payment is required. F. Exclusivity. The remedies set out in this section shall not be exclusive. Response: The applicant acknowledges that the remedies set out in this section are not exclusive. Section 2: Application Narrative 2-60 Tualatin Valley Fire&Rescue Walnut Street Fire Station August 14,2007 � � Chapter 18.795 VISUAL CLEARANCE AREAS 18.795.020 Applicability of Provisions A. When provisions apply. The provisions of this chapter shal! apply to al! development including the construction of new structures, the remodeling of existing structures and to a change of use which increases the on-site parking or loading requirements or which changes the access requirements. Response: The proposed development includes the construction of a new fire station and therefore this Code section is applicable. 8. When site developmenf review is not required... Response: Site development review is required and therefore this Code section is not applicable. 18.795.030 Visual Clearance Requirements A. At corners... Response: The proposed development is not located on a corner and therefore this criterion is not applicable. 8. Obstructions prohibited. A clear vision area shall contain no vehicle, hedge, planting, fence, wall sfructure or temporary or permanent obstruction (except for an occasional utility pole or tree), exceeding three feet in height, measured from fhe top of the curb, or where no curb exists, from the street cenfer line grade, except that trees exceeding this height may be located in this area, provided all branches below eight feet are removed. Response: As detailed on the submitted site plan, there is no vehicle parking, landscaping, fences or structures over three feet in height within the vision clearance areas. C. Additional topographical constraints. Where the crest of a hill or vertical curve conditions contribute to the obstruction of clear vision areas at a street or driveway intersection, hedges, plantings, fences, walls, wall structures and temporary or permanent obstructions shall be further reduced in height or eliminated fo comply with the intent of the required clear vision area. Response: There are no additional topographical constraints that will contribute to the obstruction of clear vision areas associated with the site and therefore this criteria is not applicable. 18.795.040 Computations B. Non-arteria!streets. 1. Non-arterial streets 24 feet or more in width. At all intersecfions of two non-arterial streets, a non- arteria! street and a driveway, and a non-arterial sfreef or driveway and railroad where at leasf one of the streets or driveways is 24 feet or more in width, a visual clearance area shall be a triangle formed by the righf-of-way or property lines along such lots and a straight line joining the right-of-way or property line af points which are 30 feef distance from the intersection of the right-of-way line and measured along such lines. Response: SW Walnut Street is a classified as a Major Collector on Figure 3-1 Existing Functional Classification of the City of Tigard's Transportation Systems Plan and is greater than 24 feet in width. Section 2: Application Narrative 2-61 Tualatin Valley Fire& Rescue Walnut Street Fire Station August 14, 2007 � � Vision clearance areas (triangles) have been detailed on the submitted site plans measuring 30 feet per side. Section 2: Application Narrative 2'62 Tualatin Valley Fire&Rescue Walnut Street Fire Station August 14, 2007 � � Chapter 18.810 STREET AND UTILITY IMPROVEMENT STANDARDS 18.810.030 Streets A. Improvements. 9. No developmenf shall occur unless the development has frontage or approved access to a public street. Response: The development site has frontage on SW Walnut Street. 2. No development shall occur unless streets within the development meet the standards of this chapter. Response: No new streets are proposed within the development site and therefore this criterion is not applicable. 3. No development shall occur unless the streets adjacent to the development meet the standards of fhis chapter, provrded, however, that a development may be approved if the adjacenf street does not meet the standards but half-street improvements meeting the standards of this tifle are constructed adjacent to the development. Response: SW Walnut Street is adjacent to the development site and no improvements are planned for that street. Per the As-builts received from the City of Tigard, the improvements made to SW Walnut Street do meet the standards of this chapter. The standards and existing conditions are detailed in a memorandum by PBS Engineering and Environmental attached as Exhibit K. 4 Any new street or additional street width planned as a portion of an existing street shall meet the standards of fhis chapter, Response: No new street or additional street width is planned as part of this development and, therefore, this criterion is not applicable. 5. If the City could and would otherwise require fhe applicant to provide street improvements, the City Engineer may accept a future improvements guarantee in lieu of street improvements if one or more of the following conditions exist: a. A partial improvement is not feasible due to the inability to achieve proper design sfandards; b. A partial improvement may create a potential safety hazard to motorists or pedestrians; c. Due to the nature of existing development on adjacent properties it is unlikely that street improvements would be extended in the foreseeable future and fhe improvement associated with the project under review does not, by itself, provide a significant improvement to street safety or capacity; d. The improvement would be in conflict with an adopted capital improvement plan; � e. The improvement is associated with an approved land partition on property zoned residentia! and the proposed land partition does not create any new streets; or Section 2: Application Narrative 2-63 Tualatin Valley Fire&Rescue Walnut Street Fire Station August 14,2007 Revised � � f. Additional planning work is required fo define the appropriate design standards for the streef and the application is for a project which would confribute only a minor portion of fhe anticipated future traffic on the streef. Response: The applicant understands that the City Engineer may accept a future improvements guarantee in lieu of street improvements under specific circumstances. 6. The standards of this chapter include the standard specificafions adopted by the City Engineer pursuant fo Section 18.810.020.B. Response: The applicant has carefully reviewed all of the applicable standards and requirements in the Tigard Code and designed the fire station development to achieve compliance with those standards. The standards and existing conditions are detailed in a memorandum by PBS Engineering and Environmental attached as Exhibit K. 7. The approval authority may approve adjustments fo the standards of this chapter if compliance with the sfandards would result in an adverse impact on natural features such as wetlands, steep slopes, or existing mature trees. The approval authority may also approve adjustments fo the sfandards of this chapter if compliance with the standards would have a substantial adverse impact on existing development or would preclude development on the property where the development is proposed. In approving an adjustment to the standards, the approva! authority shall balance the benefit of the adjusfinent with the impact on fhe public interest represented by fhe sfandards. In evaluating the impact on the public interest, the approva!authority shall consider fhe criferia listed in Section 18.810.030 E.1. An adjustment to the standards may not be granted if the adjustment would risk public safety. Response: The applicant understands that the approval authority may approve adjustments to standards of this chapter and will meet any approved standards as applicable. B. Creation of rights-of-way for streets and related purposes... C. Creation of access easements... D. Street location, width and grade... E. Minimum rights-of-way and street widths... F. Future street plan and extension of streets. G. Street spacing and access management. Refer to 18.705.030.H. H. Street alignment and connections. l. Intersection angles. Response: There are no new streets, rights-of-way or access easements being proposed as part of this development and, therefore these code criteria are not applicable. J. Exisfing rights-of-way. Whenever existing rights-of-way adjacent to or within a tract are of less than standard width, additional rights-of-way shal!be provided at the time of subdivision or development. Response: Additional right-of-way on SW Walnut Street does not appear to be required. The standards and existing conditions are detailed in a memorandum by PBS Engineering and Environmental attached as Exhibit K. K. Partial street improvements... L. Culs-de-sacs... M. Street names... N. Grades and curves... Section 2: Application Narrative 2-64 Tualatin Valley Fire&Rescue Walnut Street Fire Station August 14, 2007 Revised � • Response: There are no partial street improvements, cul-de-sacs, street names or new streets requiring grading proposed as part of this development and, therefore these criteria are not applicable. O. Curbs, curb cuts, ramps, and driveway approaches. Concrefe curbs, curb cuts, wheelchair, bicycle ramps and driveway approaches shall be constructed in accordance with standards specified in this chapter and Section 15.04.080; and: 1. Concrete curbs and driveway approaches are required; except 2. Where no sidewalk is planned, an asphalf approach may be constructed with City Engineer approval; and 3. Asphalt and concrete driveway approaches to the property line shal! be built to City configuration standards. Response: As shown in Exhibit E, all curbs, curb cuts, wheelchair and bicycle ramps and driveway approaches will be constructed in accordance with standards specified in this chapter. P. Streets adjacenf fo railroad right-of-way. Response: This development does not include a new or existing street adjacent to a railroad right-of- way and therefore this criterion is not applicable. Q. Access to arterials and collectors. Where a development abuts or is traversed by an existing or proposed arterial or collector street, the developmenf design sha!! provide adequate protection for residenfial properties and sha!!separate residential access... Response: This development does not contain any residential development or residential access and therefore this criterion is not applicable. R. Alleys, public or private... S. Survey monuments... T. Private sfreets... U. Railroad crossings... V. Street signs... W. Mailboxes... Response: There are no alley, streets or residential development proposed as part of this development and therefore, these criteria are not applicable. X. Traffic signals. The location of traffic signals shall be noted on approved streef plans. Where a proposed street infersection will result in an immediate need for a tratfic signal, a signal meeting approved specifications shall be installed. The cosf shall be included as a condition of development. Response: The center driveway to the site will serve as an exit only for emergency vehicles and will be controlled by an emergency vehicle traffic signal. This will be an emergency vehicle actuated signal that can only be activated by thP drivers of the fire trucks and will only be used to allo�v the trucks to enter traffic. The signal has been shown on the site plans and discussed in the Traffic Impact Study (Exhibit F). The applicant understands that the cost shall be included as a condition of development. Y. Street light standards... Z. Street name signs... AA. Street cross-secfions... Section 2: Application Narrative 2-65 Tualatin Valley Fire&Rescue Walnut 5treet Fire Station August 14, 2007 Revised i � AB. Traffic calming... Response: No new streets are being created nor are any traffic calming measures being proposed or street lights installed; therefore, these criteria are not applicable. AC. Traffic study. Response: A Traffic Impact Analysis has been submitted with this application as Exhibit F. 18.810.040 Blocks Response: No new streets are being created; therefore, this section is not applicable. 18.810.050 Easements A. Easements. Easements for sewers, drainage, water mains, electric lines or other public utilities shall be either dedicated or provided for in the deed restrictions, and where a development traversed by a watercourse, or drainageway, there shall be provided a storm water easement or drainage right-of-way conforming substantially with the lines of the wafercourse. 8. Utility easements. A property owner proposing a development shall make arrangements with the City, the applicable district and each utility franchise for the provision and dedication of utility easements necessary to provide full services to fhe development. The Cify's standard width for public main line utility easements shall be 15 feet unless ofherwise specified by the utility company, applicable district, or City Engineer. Response: The applicant will dedicate easements for sewers, drainage, water mains, electric lines or other public utilities as required by this section. 18.810.060 Lots Response: No new lots are being created; therefore, this section is not applicable. 18.810.070 Sidewalks A. Sidewalks. All industrial streets and private streets shall have sidewalks meeting City standards along at least one side of the street. All other streets shall have sidewalks meeting City standards along both sides of the street. A development may be approved if an adjoining streef has sidewalks on the side adjoining the development, even if no sidewalk exists on fhe other side of the sfreet. 8. Requirement of developers 1. As part of any development proposal, or change in use resulting in an additional 1,000 vehicle trips or more per day, an applicanf shall be required to identify direct, safe (1.25 x the straight line distance) pedestrian routes within 1/2 mile of their site to a!! transit facilifies and Neighborhood Acfivity Centers (schoo/s, parks, libraries, etc.). In addition, the developer may be required to participate in the removal of any gaps in the pedestrian system off-sita if justified by the development. 2. If there is an existing sidewalk, on the same side of the street as the developmenf, within 300 feet of a development sife in either direction, fhe sidewalk sha!! be extended from the site to meet the existing sidewalk, subject to rough proportionality (even if the sidewalk does not serve a neighborhood activity center). Section 2: Application Narrative 2-66 Tualatin Valley Fire&Rescue Walnut Street Fire Station August 14, 2007 Revised ! � C. Planter strip requiremenfs. A planter strip separation of at least five feet between the curb and the sidewalk shall be required in the design of streets, except where the following conditions exisf: fhere is inadequate right-of-way; the curbside sidewalks already exist on predominant portions of the street; it would conflict with the utilities, there are significant natural features (large trees, water features, etc) that would be destroyed if the sidewalk were located as required, or where there are existing structures in close proximity to the street (15 feet or less)Additional consideration for exempting fhe planter strip requirement may be given on a case by case basis if a property abuts more than one street frontage. D. Sidewalks in central business district. In the cenfral business district, sidewalks shall be 10 feet in width, and: 1. All sidewalks shall provide a continuous unobstructed path; and 2. The width of curbside sidewalks sha!!be measured from the back of the curb. E. Maintenance. Mainfenance of sidewalks, curbs, and planter sfrips is the continuing obligation of the adjacent property owner. F. Application for permit and inspection. If fhe construction of a sidewalk is not included in a performance bond of an approved subdivision or the performance bond has lapsed, then every person, firm or corporation desiring to construct sidewalks as provided by this chapter, shall, before entering upon the work or improvement, apply for a street opening permit to the Engineering department fo so build or construcf: 9. An occupancy permit shall not be issued for a development until the provisions of this section are satisfied. 2. The City Engineer may issue a permit and certificate allowing femporary noncompliance with the provisions of this section to fhe owner, builder or contractor when, in his opinion, the construction of the sidewalk is impractica!for one or more of the following reasons: a. Sidewalk grades have not and cannot be established for the property in question within a reasonable length of time; b. Forthcoming installation of public utilities or streef paving would be likely to cause severe damage to the new sidewalk; c. Street right-of-way is insufficient to accommodate a sidewalk on one or both sides of the street; or d. Topography or elevation of the sidewalk base area makes consfruction of a sidewalk impractical or economically rnfeasible; and 3. The City Engineer shal! inspect the construction of sidewalks for compliance with the provision set forth in the sfandard specificafions manual. G. Counci!initiation of construction. In the event one or more of the fo!lowing sifuafions are found by the Council to exist, the Council may adopt a resolution to initiate construction of a sidewalk in accordance with City ordinances: 1. A safety hazard exists for children walking to or from school and sidewalks are necessary to eliminate the hazard; Section 2: Application Narrative 2-67 Tualatin Valley Fire&Rescue Walnut Street Fire Station August 14, 2007 Revised i • 2. A safety hazard exists for pedestrians walking to or from a public building, commercial area, place of assembly or other general pedestrian traffic, and sidewalks are necessary to eliminate the hazard; 3. 50% or more of the area in a given block has been improved by the construction of dwellings, multiple dwellings, commercial buildings or public buildings and/or parks; and 4. A criteria which allowed noncompliance under Section E.1.b above no longer exists and a sidewalk could be consfructed in conformance with City standards. Response: As shown in Exhibit E, new sidewalks are being proposed in conformance with this section. The standards and existing conditions are detailed in a memorandum by PBS Engineering and Environmental attached as Exhibit K. 18.810.080 Public Use Areas Response: The proposed improvements are not within a subdivision; therefore, this section is not applicable. 18.810.090 Sanitary Sewers A. Sewers required. Sanitary sewers shall be insfalled to serve each new development and to connect developments to existing mains in accordance with the provisions set forth in Design and Construction Standards for Sanitary and Surface Water Management (as adopted by the Unified Sewerage Agency in 1996 and including any future revisions or amendments) and the adopted policies of the comprehensive plan. B. Sewer plan approval. The City Engineer shall approve all sanitary sewer plans and proposed systems prior to issuance of development permits involving sewer service. C. Over-sizing. Proposed sewer systems shall include consideration of additiona! development within the area as projected by the Comprehensive Plan. D. Permits denied. Development permits may be restricted by the Commission or Hearings Officer where a deficiency exists in the existing sewer system or portion thereof which cannot be rectified within the development and which if not rectified wif! result in a threat to public health or safety, surcharging of existing mains, or violations of stafe or federa! standards pertaining to operation of the sewage treatment system. Response: As shown in Exhibit E, the applicant is proposing a new sewer connection to the existing 8- inch sanitary sewer line that runs along the entire frontage of the property in conformance with this section. 18.810.100 Storm Drainage A. General provisions. The Director and City Engineer shall issue a development permit only where adequate provisions for storm water and flood water runoff have been made, and: 9. The storm water drainage system shall be separate and independent of any sanitary sewerage sysfem; Section 2: Application Narrative Z'6$ Tualatin Valley Fire& Rescue Walnut Street Fire Station August 14, 2007 Revised � � 2. Where possible, inlets shal!be provided so surface water is not carried across any intersection or allowed to flood any street; and 3. Surface water drainage patterns shall be shown on every development proposal plan. B. Easements. Where a development is traversed by a watercourse, drainage way, channel or stream, there shal! be provided a storm water easement or drainage right-of-way conforming substantiaNy with the lines of such watercourse and such further width as will be adequate for conveyance and mainfenance. C. Accommodation of upstream drainage. A culvert or other drainage facility shall be large enough to accommodate potential runoff from its entire upstream drainage area, whether inside or outside the development, and: 9. The City Engineer shal! approve the necessary size of the facility, based on the provisions of Design and Construcfion Sfandards for Sanitary and Surface Water Management (as adopted by the Unified Sewerage Agency in 1996 and including any future revisions or amendments). D. Effect on downstream drainage. Where it is anticipafed by the City Engineer that the additional runotf resulting from the development will overload an existing drainage facility, the Director and Engineer shal/ withhold approval of the development until provisions have been made for improvement of the potential condition or until provisions have been made for storage of addifional runoff caused by the development in accordance with the Design and Construction Standards for Sanitary and Surface Water Management (as adopted by the Unified Sewerage Agency in 1996 and including any future revisions or amendments). Response: As described in Exhibit H, Storm Drainage Report, and Exhibit B, CWS Documentation, the stormwater will be collected by catch basins and routed to a 100' vegetated bioswale for water quality treatment and detention before being released into the wetland buffer and flowing overland into Krueger Creek. This project will not be using the public storm water system and all proposed improvements related to the site's stormwater management will meet City standards. 18.810.110 Bikeways and Pedestrian Pathways Response: There are no bikeways or pedestrian pathways proposed for this development and therefore this section is not applicable. 18.810.120 Utilities Response: Utility lines have previously been underground on site and will be available to serve the proposed development. 18.810.130 Cash or Bond Required A. Guarantee. A!I improvements installed by the developer shall be guaranfeed as to workmanship and material for a period of one year following acceptance by the Cify Council. B. Cash deposit or bond. Such guarantee shall be secured by cash deposit or bond in the amount of the value of the improvements as set by the City Engineer. C. Compliance requirements. The cash or bond shaU comply wifh the terms and conditions of Section 18.430.090. Section 2: Application Narrative 2-69 Tualatin Valley Fire& Rescue Walnut Street Fire Station August 14, 2007 Revised Response: The applicant understands that for public improvements a cast deposit or bond may be required as a guarantee of workmanship and materials. 18.810.140 Monuments A. Replacement required. Any monuments that are disturbed before all improvements are completed by the subdivider shall be replaced prior to final acceptance of the improvements. Response: This development does not include a subdivision and no monuments will be disturbed. 18.810.150 Installation Prerequisite A. Approva! required. No public improvements, including sanifary sewers, storm sewers, streets, sidewalks, curbs, lighting or other requirements shall be undertaken except after the plans have been approved by the City, permit fee paid, and permit issued. B. Permit fee. The permit fee is required to defray the cost and expenses incurred by the City for construction and other services in connection with the improvemenf. The permit fee shall be sef by Council resolution. Response: The applicant will make no public improvements, including sanitary sewers, storm sewers, streets, sidewalks, curbs, lighting or other requirements until after the plans have been approved by the City, permit fee paid, and permit issued. 18.810.160 Installation Conformation A. Conformance required. !n addition to other requirements, improvements installed by the developer eifher as a requirement of these regulations or at his own option, shall conform to the requirements of this chapter and fo improvement standards and specifications followed by the City. B. Adopted installation standards. The Standard Specifications for Public Works Construction, Oregon Chapfer A.P.W.A., and Design and Construction Standards for Sanitary and Surface Water Management (as adopted by the Unified Sewerage Agency in 1996 and including any future revisions or amendments) shall be a part of the City's adopted installation standard(s); other standards may also be required upon recommendation of the Cify Engineer. Response: Improvements installed by the applicant shall conform to the requirements of this chapter and to the improvement standards and specifications followed by the City. 18.810.170 Plan Check A. Submittal requirements. Work shall nof begin until construction plans and construction estimates have been submitted and checked for adequacy and approved by the City Engineer in writing. The developer can obtain detailed information about submitfal requirements from the City Engineer. 8. Compliance. All such plans shall be prepared in accordance with requirements of the City. Response: The applicant will not begin work until after the construction plans and construction estimates have been approved by the City Engineer. 18.810.180 Notice to City A. Commencement. Work shal!not begin until the City has been notified in advance. Section 2: Application Narrative 2-�� Tualatin Valley Fire& Rescue Walnut Street Fire Station August 14,2007 Revised 8. Resumption. !f work is discontinued for any reason, it shall not be resumed until the City is notified. Response: The applicant will notify the City in advance of beginning work. 18.810.190 City Inspection A. Inspection of improvements. Improvements shall be constructed under the inspection and to the satisfaction of the City. The City may require changes in typical sections and details if unusua! conditions arising during construction warrant such changes in the public interest. Response: The applicant understands that improvements will be constructed under the inspection and to the satisfaction of the City. 18.810.200 Engineer's Certification A. Written certification required. The developer's engineer shal! provide wriften certification of a form provided by the City that all improvements, workmanship and materials are in accord with current and standard engineering and construction practices, and are of high grade, prior to City acceptance of fhe subdivision's improvemenfs or any portion thereof for operation and maintenance. Response: The applicant's engineer will provide written certification that all improvements, workmanship and materials are in accord with current and standard engineering and construction practices, and are of high grade. Section 2: Application Narrative 2-7� Tualatin Valley Fire& Rescue Walnut Street Fire Station August 14, 2007 Revised Section 3: Exhibits Tualatin Valley Fire & Rescue Walnut Street Fire Station � ♦ ► �. � a r Exhibit A: Proof of Ownership and Legal Description Tualatin Valley Fire & Rescue Walnut Street Fire Station v ,�i,' � — --1 V Wuhlr '.ounry,Orepon 2006-078348 � , , osraa o:2a:37 AM �2 ; o�w c�x•� w,•�e oMOfrnuN , �20.00 tO.OD t11.00•Tot�l•f77.00 Z.0 III)I� ' ! I I � I I II , II I Il I � � a�,�R TFiIS SPACE RESER' aos7saaa20 7aaasooeooao p �C 1,Pochud HoE�mICM,Din of Apn�m�M�nd � 4�� ,� T�z�tlon mA EY-0Illcle uMy CUrM forNAuhlnpton Ceunty,Onpon,do nbY o�rtltY that Ir�rNthln ; f� Nutrum�nt of 0 wu neNv�d�nd neord�d In th� ,; •. , �, book ef nc �ei��e�y�y.�] �I I,�- ' ' Cf�...wic V Aar �\ ��L' W.Hob�mkht,Olnetor ef Mm�m�M and Tu�den,EaOfflele Ceunty CI�eN After recording return to: Tualatin Valley Fire&Rescue 20665 SW Blanton Street Aloha, OR 97007 Undl a change is requested all tax statements sha11 be sent to the following address: Tualatin Valley Fire&Rescue 20665 SW 8lanton Street Aloha, OR 97007 File No.: 7034-845978(nt) Date: June 26, 200b STATUTORY WARRANTY DEED �`J Windwood Construction,Inc., Grantor, conveys and warrants to Tualatin Valley Fire&Rescue, Grantee, the following described real property free of liens and encumbrances,except as specifically set � forth herein: � m � See Legal Description attached hereto as Exhibit A and by this reference fncorporated herein. m �� _ c q This property is free from liens and encumbrances,EXCEPT: a� 1. Covenants, conditions, restrictions and/or easements, if any, affecting title,which may appear in � the public record, including those shown on any recorded plat or survey. ** This Deed is being re—recorded to show acceptance by Tualatin Valley Fire � z° and Rescue, a Rural Fire Pr�te ��r��r�Ht��y��W�entsofORS93.030) The true consideration for this conveyance s $�, , BEFORE SIGNING OR ACCEPTING THIS INSTRUMENT, THE PERSON TRANSFERRING FEE T1TLE SHOULD INQUIRE ABOUT THE PERSON'S RIGI-fTS, IF ANY, UNDER ORS 197.352. THIS INSTRUMENT DOES NOT ALLOW USE OF THE PROPERTY DESCRIBED IN THIS INSfRUMENT IN VIOLATION OF APPLICABLE 11aND USE LAWS AND REGULATIONS. BEFORE SIGNING OR ACCEPTING THIS IN5TRUMENT, THE PERSON ACQUIRING FEE TITLE TO THE PROPERTY SHOULD CHECK WITH TNE APPROPRIATE CfT1'OR COUNTY PLANNING DEPARTMENT TO VERIFY APPROVED USES AND TO DETERMINE ANY LIMITS ON LAWSUITS AGAINST FARMING OR F�REST PRACTICES AS DEFINED IN ORS 30.930 AND TO INQUIRE ABOUT THE RIGHTS OF NEIGHBORING PROPERTY OWNERS, IF ANY, UNDER ORS 197.352. Dated this 2 7 day af �'"� � Z� " ` Page 1 of 4 C` S X ✓'�tJ4�cn/�j Y�CUtG� � -� 2o c�- v7�3y� . � � . ' t , APN:R480688 Statutory Warranty Deed File No.:7034-845978(nt) -continued Date:06/26/2006 Windwood Construction, Inc By: M. Dale Richards, President STATE OF Oregon ) )ss. County of Washington } This instrument was acknowfedged before me on this �day of �Y��-- ZD � by M. Dale Richards as President of Windwood Construction, Inc,on beha of the . � OFFICIAL SEAI. N�COlAT.T1MM Notary Public for Oregon NpTaP�PuBUC-0 E� �p►;.��,�-��,��N N0.3�5 My commission expires: MYCOMM�c;;U"'a?;:iESJAN.21,2008 .-�. ACCEPTED BY: Tualatin Valle Fire and Rescue, a Rura te tion District By: ��. Its: Page 2 of 4 STATE OF OREGON ' COUNTY OF WASHINGTON Pers ally appeared before me.this �day of , 2006, the above named et� who being duly sworn, did say that he is a� 'V� ' C. � of TUALATIN VALLEY FIRE AND RESCUE, A RURAL FIRE PROTECTION DISTRICT, and that said instrument was signed on betia�€�: of said corporation, and acknowledged said instrument to be his voluntary act and deed ��1J�.1., � _ ��8� Notary Public of Oregon �, n.1�� 8HERRI D CAMARN.LO p� NOTARY PUBUC-ORE(�ON My Commission Expires: COMMI3810N NO.887p8d MY COMM18810N E)�IREB NOV.27,200a A \ . � APN:R480688 Statutory Warranty Deed Flle No.;7034-845978(nt) -continued Date:061z6/2006 EXHIBIT A LEGAL DESCRIPTION: Beginning at the Southeast corner of the East half of the North half of the Southeast quarter of the Northeast quarter of Section 4,Township 2 South, Range 1 West of the Wlllamette Meridian,and running thence West 466.7 feet to a point, running thenoe North 466.7 feet to a point; thence East 466.7 feet to a point, runnfng thence South 466.7 feet to the place of beginning; EXCEPTING TNEREFROM the follawing property: A tract of land in Section 4,Township 2 South, Range 1 West,Willamette Meridian, in the City of Tigard, Washington County, State of Oregon, more particularly described as follows: Beginning at the quarter comer on the East Iine of said Secdon 4, thence South by 89° 18'West, on the South line of the Northeast quarter of said Section 4, 299.2 feet to an iron pipe; thence North 1°42' West, pardllel with the East line of said Section 4,655.4 feet to a point in the center of County Road No. 934 from which point an iron bea�s South 1°42' East 2d.0 feet, thence North 89° 22' East 235.0 feet to the true point of beginning of the here(n described premises; thence North i°42' West to a pofnt on the South line of County Road No. 934; thence Northeasterly along said South Iine to a point on the East line of said Sedion 4; thence South 1°42' East along said East line to a point that bears North 89° 22' East 64.2 feet from the true point of beginnfng; thence South 89°22' West 64.2 feet to the true point of beginning. A150 EXCEP'TING THEREFROM the following property: A tract of land in Section 4,Township 2 South, Range 1 West,Willamette Meridfan, in the City of Tigard, Wash(ngton County, State of Oregon, more particularly described as follows: Beginning at the quarter corner on the East line of safd Section 4, thence South by 89° 18'West,on the South Iine of the Northeast quarter of said Section 4, 299.2 feet to an fron pfpe;thence North 1°�2' West, parallel with the East line of said Sectfon 4,655.4 feet to a point i�the center of County Road No. 934 fram which point an iron bears South 1°42' East 20.0 feet,thence North 89° 22'East 235.0 feet to the true po(nt of beginning of the herein described premises; thence North 1°42'West to a point on the South line of County Road No. 934; thence Southwesterly along sald South line to a point on the North line of that certain tract described in deed to Sever 0. Severson, et ux, recorded]anuary 03, 1941 tn Book 195, Page 153,Washington County Deed Records; thence North 89° 22' East to the true point of beginning. ALSO EXCEPTING THEREFROM the following property: The property situated in the City of Tigard, Washington County, State of Oregon described as follows: Beginning at a point which is South 1°42' 20"West 220.35 feet, and North 87° Z6'00"West 157.30 feet from the Southeast corner of the Northeast 1/4 of the Northeast iJ4 of Section 4,Township 2 South, Range 1 West, Willamette Meridian in Ehe City of Tigard, Washington County, State of Oregon;thence South 44°32' 13" West 453.o5 feet; thence North 1° 26'40" East 336.90 feet; thence South 87° 26'00" East 309.57 feet to the point of beginning. Page 3 of 4 i ' 1 • APN:R480688 Statutory Warranry Deed Fle No.:7034845978{nt} -contlnued Date:06/26/2006 ALSO EXCEP"fING THEREFROM the following property conveyed to Washington County recorded February 07, 2005 as Fee No. 2005-013084. �SSOR+Tq,� I, Richard W. Hobernicht, Director of Assessment rPSS � cp`( andTaxation and Ex-0fficio County Clerk for �.k • ` � �'�� Washington County, do hereby certify this to be a � ��'.� o true and correct mpy of the original. U + + Date: 12 OD�o -ry •'• ••�o By: .,�� cT��V COU1,�V.� Page 4 of 4 • � �rV � c�. �'ov� e �' � � \ Exhibit B: Clean Water Services Required Documentation Tualatin Valley Fire & Rescue Walnut Street Fire Station M ° "`1� C1eanWate� Services Our commitment is clear. CWS File Numbe� AMENDED Service Provider Letter 07-002492 This form and the attached conditions will serve as your Service Provider Letter in accordance with Clean Water Services Design and Construction Standards (R8�0 07-20). Jurisdiction: Washington County Review Type: Corridor Averaging SPL Original Date: August 13,2007 Site Address 12585 SW Walnut ST SPL Amendment Date October 18,2007 1 Location: Tigard,OR 97223-1702 SPL Expiration Date: August 12,2009 Applicant Information: Owner Infortnation: Trigg, Bemice B Rev Liv Trust Bemice G Name Name Trigg Tr By Devina Steams Company PBS Environmental Company Address 1310 Main ST Address 17235 SW Hillsboro HWY Vancouver,WA 98660 Shervvood,OR 97140 Phone/Fax (360)690-4331 Phone/Fax E-mail: E-mail: Tax lot ID Development Activity 2S104AD04500 Single Lot Commercial(Fire Station) Pre-Development Site Conditions: Post Development Site Conditions: Sensitive Area Present: � On-Site ❑X Off-Site Sensitive Area Present: ❑X On-Site ❑X Off-Site Variable: 50 to 80 Vegetated Corridor Width: feet Vegetated Corridor Width: Variable:50 to 80 feet Vegetated Corridor Condition: Degraded Enhancement of Remaining Vegetated Corridor Required: 0 Square Footage to be enhanced: 27,418 Encroachments into Pre-Development Vegetated Corridor: ' Type and location of Encroachment: Square Footage: Grading within Vegetated Corridor 186 Stormwater Flow Spreader 100 Mitigation Requirements: Type/Location Sq. Ft./RatiolCost On-Site 286 ❑X X Development Figures Attached(2)❑ Planting Plan Attached ❑ Geotech Report Required Conditions Attached ❑ This Service Provider Letter does NOT eliminate the need to evaluate and protect water quality sensitive areas if they are subsequently discovered on your property. P�e�as CWS File Number ��Z�� In order to comply with Clean Water Services water quality protection requirements the project must comply with the following conditions: 1. No structures, development, construction activities, gardens, lawns, application of chemicals, uncontained areas of hazardous materials as defined by Oregon Department of Environmental Quality, pet wastes, dumping of materials of any kind, or other activities shall be permitted within the sensitive area or Vegetated Corridor which may nega6vely impact water quality, except those allowed in Chapter 3. 2. Prior to any site clearing, grading or construction the Vegetated Corridor and water quality sensitive areas shall be surveyed, staked, and temporarily fenced per approved plan. During construction the Vegetated Corridor shall remain fenced and undisturbed except as allowed by Section 3.06.1 and per approved plans. 3. Prior to any activity within the sensitive area, the applicant shall gain authorization for the project from the Oregon Division of State Lands (DSL) and US Army Corps of Engineers (USACE). The applicant shall provide the District or its designee (appropriate city) with copies of all DSL and USACE project authorization permits. No impacts currently proposed. 4. An approved Oregon Department of Forestry Notification is required for one or more trees harvested for sale, trade, or barter, on any non-federal lands within the State of Oregon. � 5. Appropriate Best Management Practices (BMP's) for Erosion Control, in accordance with the CWS Erosion Control Technical Guidance Manual shall be used prior to, during, and following earth disturbing activities. 6. Prior to construction, a Stormwater Connection Permit from the District or its designee is required pursuant to Ordinance 27, Section 4.6. 7. The District or City/County shall require an easement over the Vegetated Corridor conveying storm and surtace water management to the District or City that would prevent the owner of the Vegetated Corridor from activities and uses inconsistent with the purpose of the corridor and any easements therein. 8. Activities located within the 100-year floodplain shall comply with Section 5.10 of R&O 07-20. 9. Removal of native,woody vegetation shall be limited to the greatest extent practicable. 10. Should final development plans differ significantly from those submitted for review by the District, the applicant shall provide updated drawings, and if necessary, obtain a � revised Service Provider Letter. SPECIAL CONDITIONS 11. The Vegetated Co�ridor width for sensitive areas within the project site shall be a minimum of 50 feet wide, as measured horizontally from the delineated boundary of the sensitive area. 12. For Vegetated Corridors greater than 50 feet in width, the applicant shall enhance the flrst 50 feet closest to the Sensitive Area to meet or exceed good corridor condition as defined in Section 3.14.2, Table 3-3. 13. For Vegetated Corridors that extend 35 feet from the break in slope, the width of Vegetated Corridors may be reduced to 15 feet wide if a stamped geotechnical report confirms that slope stability can be maintained with the reduced setback from the break in slope. 14. Clean Water Services shall be notified 72 hours prior to the start and completion of enhancement/restoration activities. EnhancemenUrestoration activities shall comply with the guidelines provided in Landscape Requirements (R8�0 07-20: Appendix A). 15. Prior to installation of plant materials, all invasive vegetation within the Vegetated Corridor shall be removed. During removal of invasive vegetation care shall be taken to minimize impacts to existing native trees and shrub species. pape 2 d 5 CWS Flle Number ��'�Z�� 16. Enhancement/restoration of the Vegetated Corridor shail be provided in accordance with R8�0 07-20, Appendix A. 17. Prior to any site clearing, grading or construction, the applicant shall provide the District with the required Vegetated Corridor enhancement/restoration plan in compliance with R&O 07-20. 18. Maintenance and monitoring requirements shall comply with Section 2.11.2 of R8�0 07-20. If at any time during the warranty period the landscaping falls below the 80% survival level, the Owner shall reinstall all deficient planting at the next appropriate planting opportunity and the finro year maBntenance period shall begin again from the date of replanting. 19. Performance assurances for the Vegetated Corridor shall comply with Sec6on 2.06.2, Table 2-1 and Section 2.10, Table 2-2. 20. The water quality swale and detention pond shall be planted with District approved native species, and designed to blend into the natural surroundings. CONDITIONS TO BE INCLUDED ON FINAL PLANS 21. Final construction plans shall include landscape plans. Plans shall include in the details a description of the methods for removal and control of exotic species, location, distribution, condition and size of plantings, existing plants and trees to be preserved, and installation methods for plant materials. Plantings shall be tagged for dormant season identification. Tags to remain on plant material after planting for monitoring purposes. 22. A Maintenance Pfan shall be included on final plans including methods, responsible party contact infoRnation, and dates(minimum two times per year, by June 1 and September 30). 23. Final construction plans shall clearly depict the location and dimensions of the sensitive area and the Vegetated Corridor (indicating good, marginal, or degraded condition). Sensitive area boundaries shall be marked in the field. 24. Protection of the Vegetated Corridors and associated sensitive areas shall be provided by the installation of permanent fencing and signage befinreen the development and the outer limits of the Vegetated Corridors. Fencing and signage details to be included on final construction . plans. This Service Provider Letter is not valid unless CWS-aaproved site olan is attached. Please call(503)681-3613 with any questions. ' Julie Wirth Environmental Plan Review Attachments( 2 ) Page 3 of 5 , • , � �.8��0 , I ,::..,.`:`�`� � e ,�. A*�o � t ( t s �,`' o °� ,�.a '_��, � PLANIING 1 9 +� S, . , . ...,..', .\.,.� . COMMUMTY tj O � I 'l`�a • � ;;�,.\....`\`:��• '�OOD' I.O R � .��,\\\\.��..�. �' , �. � _� � �e { . � '� � � OECiD ��•� " 5 � AL ra �p s� /• • r/� /� � QlOINE9tIN0AND@lVIROt�B�IT ,m ,��il'' �� , r� . a 1310 MIUN STREET � s' DECID'� � /, � � �� yq�,��pN/EFt,WASHINGTON 98660 �%% � 4 - � PHONE:360.690.4331 rf ��.� FAX:360.698.�J06M1 6' DEpDe % � r"/ :,n'°�s'-' y �r� www.Pbsemr.0an I ,��'^• �` �i��f,` ��o�� ,,I�� S I EXISTiNG 24" J' 28' FlR f;, /� ' Ut�/9'✓� � I o1 CMP CULV£RT .� .`•` ��f��i / l � �QOb� . �:%-`;�,,•��r� ApProvetl .--.. � 1°�, z�,°° --r�.� fi!� ;1� __� � C Wa e ce ;Qsr°°�� - � � 4}��`� �� / O� U�L�v�UiV'G+� � t�n �.¢ulC� ti5 /;�i � �l l `' 66DEGD� • '��C�� / f� �' �* �1 Pi �-r3,.?oo � . 6' DECIDA ,s.�� n 6�OEpD� '� j� �-f / qb 3 Ob'�a f4'r"�G��'1'1�i� L % �� 1 �R6�0 ' ENHANCEMENT AREA�27,478 S4 FT• � Z5� � _'`�� ,�.�c� / ��. '� ,,, � O � '�� ' � � W � �� , �..y/''�'� : H ns � � � �M1��i/ /�' /_� �o� � � � � TOP OF BANK ,/ /�f,!/�%f/�/� ,/�'�� ,,.,� � , D � rn O �� • �� " �// � I .�'Cn . /' GA � V 1 � I ' � .�.0 �� /.� � ..�.. '�� i `S [/�S �7C.. � '�. ,.-.'; s ...� .,,�-----s.. .; �C� a�- �lD a��Z E'� � �' j '� � r.;, , , �z.- `__/ �_� � ^ ,; 7 DEC�D��': , � Approved �� %//`f ��. n �� BIARNG � O j^ Clean Water Services ., l iR �� .32' DECiD . 3.253 ACr2E5 .—.- '-" �iV►Vl�Q1yY�.�j�,Kl � PERMANENT DRAINAGE �% 1-.�'�� / ' �= \ � Ib2,232 5�. FT.) � �� 1 AND CONSERVATION �� r�/�� %�/M1 / ti � . + q� B ASEMENT ,i. :f J ��,�� / � �� Z� �d' Y Daie �C��L -�� / i � / �j�� / � 1S1 =-�� . O� 1� 1�_ ,� L � y� T�"1 / �� '��/� f� C.� /�i I�i,��,�- �"i'�i1LDING �..,�_ a �71'L /TI�'C<L�VtiL.�J1 �� F�_I �� i,/ '.`-------__—__ 5 ( 2 �/ � �` � � � �� j { L�t ` � �� W �n i�`pj�` / f� •/ /- `��;'�-� � 4 � ��1 Q ��:. / � ��j,�/t' / A =1;'{'J:-'�..;.: .. ��'�'i v I � ,� � /'l/'/� i�� y" DEqD � - ., :�,al"r':,,: - N � � //.// 11' DEpO 'x' _'a Y::� ,� s� � l. ::�:.:. ',, � � N �. �� / // � - .k�. ,. ' ,�, / .•. . ' g �� i I i / � � �4 � t� � ��1��/ �/, � vEC�A7m '� "} �� ' � +f • p } ' CORRIDOR� 11' DECID 22' DEqD � ,- � � r ��ji � � � � B UNDAFtY �t \-� /� �� 15"!�4� � � n I � ; // _��_.; �'r T� � 2 p�'� `;�.��,�t, �//j��,/J% EXI571NG EXISTING SLOPE � L5�r� �. ;�'' � ��l lf��/ / //4 ES�DEI�CE - �� A EASEMENT_ �''' s�s ' � �'/• � � I EXISTiNG SLOPE ^'� � o .�/� �, i �. :r : i `� � , 1!!,� + � � 1 nNO unuTr -sl- - \' ,� FxisnNC cu�vERr 1 �,y� , ;! i �_--- � �` �,' m (1 P'. � I t / - -- - _ .�yyEASEMENT �__�- �.-.� � � a '/ ,�- -� .y� ----- --�" R��3�. . , + / N' � /� `r � 70I'i'17'R + � ��--- - — — ———— — � . � Y r i.� � �, ? - s ; . '' — w LEGEND 3 � . �-- =� yf i '� '�� —VEGETATED CORRIDOR BWNDRY I - -� � � •�Y �.�.�. —_'_'_ T � � �' -SLOPE BREAK ��STING CONDITIONS ---r'� ' __�� -�.! _—_—__r----� ��` _ � O VEGETATED CORRIDOR PlOTS AIIAP �, �z�-� � • TR��T � K -- .� � � WET LAND � _ m...,,.,r��,._n � � _ PRaECr.. 7�020.000 � _ � � _�,r-_ j � -- F4` -_ � 50� ENHANCEMENT AREA F_I F,,_ �—� �nr�: AUGUST 2Q07 � ' , "NOTE: ENHANCEMENT AREA - 27.416 SO- FT. NOTE: 'NTIRE VECETATED CORRIDOR EXISTINC FIGURE: ' ON SITE IS DEGRADED(COMMUNITY 2). AREA 6 a 30, � 1� $URR�UNDING VC-1 IS �GOOD� (COMMUNITY 1). � �S I � � � - � SCALE: 1'=60' y O � �v SNGX.Y KWw'XF � �� uw:0,�zr��r � 6 • � e%i��t c'(�-2+f�7-m,_ � � O �,�� r . V � V OS �� 137.]0' �� ,�c,��' e�a , a��a r�� . . o � ,'� o � )� $ � � i Q � M1,a � , eao�maNO�t1D�Vwore.mrvu. 6.�� 1310 NUUN STREET • ,..f �� o V/WCOUVER W360.690.4331 � /J .l _fj dt e�' i EN�A�11�ffM.I�f ` � p2R�OP�SED � ti,�� FAX:360.B�B.�OB�4 EiI571NC 24' AREA-/ "�jfj-.,. 7F i_ C�S www.P�.cam � �P«,�,�T� �.��;,��r ;;.� y �E,� • e�- D o a 9 Z �� ,• ,� ; p �;�� s�� ///��j -- ,;� � ____ Clean Water Services � 45' 52.242 S.F. '/ _ � �• / GW V�I1ovlly��.ot( y�ov1. /l�J � �,.20 �c�s� 6�� , � BY �,J Date i.— o�� roa , � ��'° F . ��i� ,� � �•�� f�m�2� �Q t_ �'�t�c�-,w�-�-� �►wvrcaar ar�a=n �a so.Fr: � ��y�-�'� J �,� .� 2 �'-----�. a�'� ' -` �� . � d� `� �►-� ! - — — � � �es sar r_�/� � Z /f�• �-=-- o _ _ � � � [—� �� '�, , �.==;r_ -. E,.., W TOP OF BANK , � �//� I � f/ . i i� rt¢� ... '� � � .j,. i�/�. � � � - � -> q c wgC� ,. �.�. , . ./�. �' : �_ .� �. � � � . �4 ,. r re� ��5 �i/ . / �S�y�. „S•o i � �/� �.. ;.�r� -. . ._ - - � . . � � �:� _ �„� � o ,, n:�:� ,_. _ �_z.:��---- v� r� f /j� - !. ��i-,1 I! �� _ �\ � v i � ',�'�"ii� � / 1_� -` • � h�"1 / /1.(ii//// ///,�i�P e � O � i/iiJ•:%//I/ � /�.�'� ,i ,_ '" � //%�i%/�/J • � , � �T', � � I� / /'-' 'i i�� O� A"'�y Q� `� /,��/`�/�� / � � . 2'� � � . .9 ^o / / �/ ° -- o � . p . 1 �z� / f 5T p y � /// / _ . � � p p►� !� �� s'oFCO r � .'-- - �i�E Y FlRE P �p'� � r p 1'� :i ,f,��_� �/� / ..,:._ �,r STA . ' o � � F�1 , ` ` �`f,-�/;�' �� '"� r�-z3e.°°' � F-+ V � /��, �� =�'. • ,��; - � � � y w,rt�<+r�-.a£ . ' / AREA-�' _� •� � � . ' ca R:`11+�.et� � �(I �� ` . . �+� � ¢e• z}a.ia' 1 � .�� 2B8 SQFT. 889 S.F. ��V�c��o �� t,� a �r�-�,�2,,�,� s �� `�# � l ' (o.i ` N � �e T I� ��.' .O f l 3 '� �... � �e2�'M e.se' � � � ,� � ( Cf/ � ,�=� E-� yfl pCA, �Tr+`�", � �_ _ � � N9TOR �'� ,- �f rQQ' `�OL I �'� PAWONO � �-'/. � i � � . • � -� �/ � /� /'/ EJOSiWC CUL4ERT �.r�/ �tqSip+E � � �� ,p ��• 1 t „vww r,�t -'� !.'.'� � `� �� :�.� �� ` "!` , _ —' � i�� STORMWATER LEGEND � 7DIti'It'w . � '3 �� :� . '� �',� � w` •" STORM CLEANOUT � � - -�.,� - ��' _�i i , . � r1Ytf IW..H' • �r � !, ax�a�� r�-.- ...,.:,. . .. ..:.. _ . .-+ � . _.. __! � �. - J � / r f� ._ C;l� � :� _._ ---� -- � '.'�� •.'-�^"_. . -c.l�-�,r--��-`��j �' >��r:l.�'� .�.�,a�F.S?/ �� STORM MANHOLE � — - v .� • "� �- . � � . � � . �:� % ��i ��.� �i=� � CATCH BASIN �1 �7..d �� dl ��/ . / � I �� F6J✓ .� � �` :� ; �:..��• _i__'°� •t! 1 ��. Y.w�:�i .�i.,.-�� .� � i I . ..1 � � r� -•T � , � ,� MFYi7:3� �+� �RAINAGE ARROW � _�_.-�--�� . : i aAreOt�T. r ----,. — ��7�{- .. ;' _.- / .�. f . �. �.� :: 1 � ♦ - -�f .- p 1 i - iE-:1v_a. . � ��.'1� � � � :�i � i .� I'� --��STORM DRAIN L1NE _�7��-�� -��/ '-i ,�� /t�� .� 1� �_��- �r` � �►N:,u• .��__ � _ir�' --T-- • ,.,r.� - =�i�\�,� ,., � � �`_y•-�i•'�J s,.��` �—ROOF�RAIN LINE SITE PLAN � _ :c-ra�*f.'a-� ___ _ .� �.W. WALNUT �TREET �, _ �' ---J� � ��E-��a� _.. c�i':'=_�i_. . � � �,n �' E�J(1�-2]O.Y+ —STORM DITCH CEN1ER LINE � � =�J��__-L-_ S-�-J----��-f�� —--•�'!• � — � —VEGETATED CORPoDOR BOUNDRY � � -•—•�•-SLOPE BREAK PRaECT: ]�JOZO.00O � ' � � OO VEGETATED CORRIDOR PLOTS � �� DATE SEPTEMBER 2007 RIP-RAP 0' 30' 60' 120' FIGURE: i SO'ENHANCEMENT AREA � $ SCALE: 1'=60' �Nare: enH�wceuwT ua�-s�,+�e so. rr. n � ❑ > \� � C1eanWate� Services Our commitment is cle.�r. CWSFileNumber Service Provider Letter 07-002492 This form and the attached conditions will serve as your Service Provider Letter in accordance with Clean Water Services Design and Construction Standards (R8�0 07-20). Jurisdiction: Washington County Review Type: Corridor Averaging Site Address 12585 SW Walnut ST SPL Issue Date: August 13,2007 /Location: Tigard, OR 97223-1702 SPL Expiration Date: August 12,2009 Applicant Information: Owner Information: Trigg, Bernice B Rev Liv Trust Bernice G Name Name Trigg Tr By Devina Stearns Company PBS Environmental Company Address 1310 Main ST Address 17235 SW Hillsboro HWY Vancouver,WA 98660 Sherwood,OR 97140 Phone/Fax (360)690-4331 Phone/Fax E-mail: E-mail: Tax lot ID Development Activity 2S104AD04500 Single Lot Commercial(Fire Station) Pre-Development Site Conditions: Post Development Site Conditions: Sensitive Area Present: � On-Site � Off-Site Sensitive Area Present: � On-Site � Off-Site Variable: 50 to 80 Vegetated Corridor Width: feet Vegetated Corridor Width: Variable:50 to 80 feet Vegetated Corridor Condition: Degraded Enhancement of Remaining Vegetated Corridor Required: � Square Footage to be enhanced: 27,418 Encroachments into Pre-Development Vegetated Corridor: Type and location of Encroachment: Square Footage: Grading>4:1 within Vegetated Corridor 186 Mitigation Requirements: Type/Location Sq. Ft./Ratio/Cost On-Site 186 ❑X Conditions Attached ❑X Development Figures Attached(2)❑ Planting Plan Attached ❑ Geotech Report Required This Service Provider Letter does NOT eliminate the need to evaluate and protect water quality sensitive areas if they are subsequently discovered on your property. Page 1 of 6 � � CWS File Number 07-002492 In order to comply with Clean Water Services water quality protection requirements the project must comply with the following conditions: 1. No structures, development, construction activities, gardens, lawns, application of chemicals, uncontained areas of hazardous materials as defined by Oregon Department of Environmental Quality, pet wastes, dumping of materials of any kind, or other activities shall be permitted within the sensitive area or Vegetated Corridor which may negatively impact water quality, except those allowed in Chapter 3. 2. Prior to any site clearing, grading or construction the Vegetated Corridor and water quality sensitive areas shall be surveyed, staked, and temporarily fenced per approved plan. During construction the Vegetated Corridor shall remain fenced and undisturbed except as allowed by Section 3.06.1 and per approved plans. 3. Prior to any activity within the sensitive area, the applicant shall gain authorization for the project from the Oregon Division of State Lands (DSL) and US Army Corps of Engineers (USACE). The applicant shall provide the District or its designee (appropriate city) with copies of all DSL and USACE project authorization permits. No impacts currently proposed. 4. An approved Oregon Department of Forestry Notification is required for one or more trees harvested for sale, trade, or barter, on any non-federal lands within the State of Oregon. 5. Appropriate Best Management Practices (BMP's) for Erosion Control, in accordance with the CWS Erosion Control Technical Guidance Manual shall be used prior to, during, and following earth disturbing activities. 6. Prior to construction, a Stormwater Connection Permit from the District or its designee is required pursuant to Ordinance 27, Section 4.6. 7. The District or City/County shall require an easement over the Vegetated Corridor conveying storm and surface water management to the District or City that would prevent the owner of the Vegetated Corridor from activities and uses inconsistent with the purpose of the corridor and any easements therein. 8. Activities located within the 100-year floodplain shall comply with Section 5.10 of R&O 07-20. 9. Removal of native, woody vegetation shall be limited to the greatest extent practicable. 10. Should final development plans differ significantly from those submitted for review by the District, the applicant shall provide updated drawings, and if necessary, obtain a revised Service Provider Letter. SPECIAL CONDITIONS 11. The Vegetated Corridor width for sensitive areas within the project site shall be a minimum of 50 feet wide, as measured horizontally from the delineated boundary of the sensitive area. 12. For Vegetated Corridors greater than 50 feet in width, the applicant shall enhance the first 50 feet closest to the Sensitive Area to meet or exceed good corridor condition as defined in Section 3.14.2, Table 3-3. 13. For Vegetated Corridors that extend 35 feet from the break in slope, the width of Vegetated Corridors may be reduced to 15 feet wide if a stamped geotechnical report confirms that slope stability can be maintained with the reduced setback from the break in slope. 14. Clean Water Services shall be notified 72 hours prior to the start and completion of enhancement/restoration activities. EnhancemenUrestoration activities shall comply with the guidelines provided in Landscape Requirements(R&0 07-20: Appendix A). 15. Prior to installation of plant materials, all invasive vegetation within the Vegetated Corridor shall be removed. During removal of invasive vegetation care shall be taken to minimize impacts to existing native trees and shrub species. Page 2 of 5 CWS File Number 07-0D2492 16. EnhancemenUrestoration of the Vegetated Corridor shall be provided in accordance with R&O 07-20, Appendix A. 17. Prior to any site clearing, grading or construction, the applicant shall provide the District with the required Vegetated Corridor enhancement/restoration plan in compliance with R&O 07-20. 18. Maintenance and monitoring requirements shall comply with Section 2.11.2 of R&O 07-20. If at any time during the warranty period the landscaping falls below the 80% survival level, the Owner shall reinstall all deficient planting at the next appropriate planting opportunity and the two year maintenance period shall begin again from the date of replanting. 19. Performance assurances for the Vegetated Corridor shall comply with Section 2.06.2, Table 2-1 and Section 2.10, Table 2-2. 20. The water quality swale and detention pond shall be planted with District approved native species, and designed to blend into the natural surroundings. CONDITIONS TO BE INCLUDED ON FINAL PLANS 21. Final construction plans shall include landscape plans. Plans shall include in the details a description of the methods for removal and control of exotic species, location, distribution, condition and size of plantings, existing plants and trees to be preserved, and installation methods for plant materials. Plantings shall be tagged for dormant season identification. Tags to remain on plant material after planting for monitoring purposes. 22. A Maintenance Plan shall be included on final plans including methods, responsible party contact information, and dates (minimum two times per year, by June 1 and September 30). 23. Final construction plans shall clearly depict the location and dimensions of the sensitive area and the Vegetated Corridor (indicating good, marginal, or degraded condition). Sensitive area boundaries shall be marked in the field. 24. Protection of the Vegetated Corridors and associated sensitive areas shall be provided by the installation of permanent fencing and signage between the development and the outer limits of the Vegetated Corridors. Fencing and signage details to be included on final construction plans. This Service Provider Letter is not valid unless CWS-approved site plan is attached. Ptease call (503)681-3613 with any questions. � ' � � �- ------ f.:---^'_.1 ' _ .. ' .. i�� `�. . . _:_�..._.....-.'_._.._-_-� Julie Wirth ; Environmental Plan Review Attachments( 2 ) Page 3 of 5 t / \\ / � �'SU'i`'*ar, ; 1 y� � 1 �' � PLANTING � � � � __4 _ _ ;COMMUNITY 1i O ' .___.. _ .. J ..GOOD' � O –..._._...__ , ,� 1., nt �r.4� � _ . c �.M. 1 .:.� .. . ��6;... - .'/ca - � �6" DECID / ' � / 5" DECiD � . ENGINEERINGANDENVIRONMENTAL � � �DECiD �� ? 131DMAINSTREET i VANCOWER WASHINGTON 98660 , J ^_e ` � �`.. ��'�� PHONE:360.690.4331 s' / �*•,"�� FAX:360.696.9064 /r ! 50, ��f i � �•�';i':\ www.pbSenv.COm EX�STiNG 24"� Y' / � � J i'� �"�1''" CMP CUL'✓FRT L. � � /� � � � � 28" FIR � � �ti�, �' �th�� .. - �� — I��/C�� J % ��•� �� ,TM,.� Approved �...-.:� ��'��,�� : _ ./�- Clean Wa�er Se ice � q4" F'�R /� . �,,...- �' � /' �c� E�wv�rcnv►�e'.1 �r/ �7un ��urtc � 6" DECiD / ..% 6�6oE��o�e�o�,_�� ;'� .=,_ f,! , sY_ .�.� Qate �-r3.J�z 6" DECID � � � ,/�I�_ ENHANCEMENTAREA=27,41854FT. e /�-�" �'yb S� � ��I'1��'M�k� �� c�- �d �'y 5Q 2ovs % / ..� /"/' ,+y / f! ',/ ' ... . . m 1� �� ,. � "�� , �/ _�� , � � J ' ..___,.- ~i � � -/" '/ �M ' J`~ F�+'� ! I �t Pb° �: ..---.'.'� � 6 '� ��Q �___� ..-0.... �� / �Q� ,/ / . y� � � � 7 TOP OF �A,1'K �� i� � � � i / .- _.. .:_ : �� "� � 1�� !� /I� :/� 50' 24% '/� � _ . � .�• � Cn O 2� ` �1� '.f _ � � �.: � [—� �.� J �` - ... ��". ExlS i��N� . .. ._ .. ,,,�-�� / / 32" DECiD\�`—J BARN F-L� PERMA�ENT DnA�iNAGE � l---•"�—" � � nND CuNStRVAiION � � \ 5'2��. EASEMENT f / � _�� ., ' � � ; , � � � . ' 35 I ( � � QO i ik„ �r� ��,��' �/ � � �UILDING � � . / J r V ` ' . ..� � / .%�`�- F�v�r �� /� �- �- {/ �" //..�. � -" : .. - � r 1-1 , , ° � .' : . - _ J � .. ... / / :j/� -',,,.., ,.�– .. �(!:_____- . , �/ � � � /� �. �... �/ � 6" D=C10 � � ��• � Fni., m • - m :..�, � / , ��/ 11" �ECID � , ��, ��-.` � � ,� . - . . -- � N a � � �..� ,� �� .,- � " � � ,--+ o g � : �� 'JVEGETATED � q R � O ��0 '„rf CORRIDOR �"' 11" DECID 22" DEGD . / � . g � v�'� I O �// r s` f BOUNDARY !_.:! ��~``l . ,- " ' I�1 � � ¢ _ , / O /' � -:--- -. � i sw�s•ze�w s.se� � . I � �� i� / �.y-^"�•r � EXISTING I EXISTING SLOPE ;�_�'�� /�-'��' � 3 �� . � ESiDENCE AND UTILIiY � � Q / l� I ' � EXISTING SLOPE � � EaSEMENT �-�'�! I �y � u �EXISilNG CUlVERT�-� " �� - AND UTIUTY -� �� ' _ � �• m � � - �� EASEMENT .�' -�-- �':' . � J.�,--- � __ - ; ---------'-� � � r�� -� " ------- --- ,- m � � -- �'� ./-�' �n sm3utirw aar ; �`"--------------- ---'""� //� m ---- .,, --- m / _. � _ �V�i'.....-- � �_�r .-- LEGEND � �'�• -% �,,r/' '� • „�,.-- . � — — — VEGETATED CORRiDOR BOUNDRv � i .... : . �.- � . � �_� .____. � . , . + .. . —•—•—• �r-�.-.-'" � -�_�--_�� "�__�_ /' � ..� � :� �� J — SLOPE BREAK p � .��_��_ !.. , �'� . ., — ---_�___—_—_--_-----�- EXISTING CONDITIONS � _ ,. _,_ � _ � � �� ''� l.;�� ;:��- � " -� � ;' VEGETATE� CORRiDOR PLOTS O ' � � . . .., , . va, MAP c „ � ; ts_�1 . �' � �-- - � j—� WET LAND � ��: PROJECT: 75020.000 _ -��'-�--_ `� . _ _---�.__�_ _—,� �� " NOTE: ENTIRE VEGETATE� CORRIDOR EXISTING � 50' ENHANCEMENT AREA DATE: AUGUST 2007 ON SIT� IS DEGRADE�(COMMUNITY 2). AREA "NOTE� E4'HANCEMENT AREA = 27,<�8 S0. �T. � 0' 30' 60' �20� suRR�uhoinc vc-i �; "c000" (coMMUw-r i) FIGURE: � � SCALE: 1"=60' � > J � o ' ' - S�:.�� see5o' is�ao' �Gt �/ �• .��A�Y ,: P B . PROPOSED / � LNCHCAC�iME�'vT � . � � OUIFALL \ � /' / 148 SC.FT. � � . � � l/ . ENGIN'eERIN�ANOENVIRONMENTAL ��,../ /`� i�- �` .�.'' 1310 MAIN STREET Q�S��/ �� VANCOWER,WASHINGTQN 98660 r,p• Q44 � � f PHONE:360.690.4331 �xsnNC. 2a" �,�-/ �/ f� �/ FAX:360.fi96.9064 .. CrnP CuLVE,4r ��- I a..n.� O ��f �'�� C�U �� a-C D.�'(hDa(LLI� �vww-pbsenv.com �\ �� A roved � , -�- {�p = � �J��an ��i�ater.5ervic�s .� 52.242 S.F. �✓ �� L�hVI✓G'V1✓Y4f✓t[Gt� Pj4,n .P�1�--• (1.20 ACRES) �-'�� i� � J�, 1 Q /� � i � }r _.`a`�'� ._ ._ �� '� ZG'0.� � / J _ i� / =e,.....:-��._1,_ . .�, .? ENHANCEMENT AREA=27,418 SQ.FT. // I /� ��L ��((`�✓1)� � L d Sa 2ox � � N6 � w iENCROACHMENT ,�, �,_ _ _ _ _ _�- � z �,.� ,�Sa�. �... m �� n ,/ � 1 � o � VC-3� r � ,�� r'l ToP cF BnNK 50,152 S.F, L, w / ` �..� � (1.15 ACRES) l� [�] � / �,� . so� zax �� , d �i � � � gp• 26 .�� . / � � � � O�I� G��` / / \ r E-1 V �/ ` � • r~ � � / � ; //� /' O�, J- F„� � / � � � / �50�31% //�'. � � � / 5T � ��a� � � 4 `� yS� �'/ ..��i� .. ' 7HREE-BAY FlRE PARKI G . � - � STAiION F„� Ea . / i�.i.. .—_ FF�236.00' _/ � � MITIGA?ION 3S �, (l�. l� �� .. � �1 . � � � `� w+npin rk�. � oJtEV,- : �` � ' .-.^• � RW 217.8f ' a e,�- 'r�. p ��s4.Fr. � 142,�32 S.F. , �T _ N � �r(aE1-�` � p . i� (3.27 ACRES) F�.r..� e--� W cd °n �,� I 5D' / � . -,."_ o � rn 'a .,,.:� . ,-' � ; / �4 . g � .00 l.� . - � �� i S . ,:��_.} � . _ ' ��c5 i� . �� .. � l�ISITOR -...... .�._�..__ , � �'��^ U1�5'28 � - ' PARKINC �_ .. / ' �I �`� �� =.� -- " � � EXIS➢NC CLLV£R7��" I I { � � �� y �' 2n � .�..�u-._� �- �—- � I �� / , "y� �� `n�T� s � i i . i i%�� STORMWATER LEGEND � �wWniw 1� � - �:� , � � � � i ii � � _ - - _ _ � I + � i I � �� j� • sToRM c�eanour , i � i � t}i" � � � � � � � �� _ _ � SiORM MANHOLE U � � I I .,_.ryr�T��' r/!/ �� , . ■ CATCH BASIN � ,.� � � � I I � ++� DRAINAGE ARROW 3 __. . - . � �. ► . . _ �-.r=Z��J � i I I �_ . """ � —�_ S70RM RAW LWE _ _ ao- �• _. _'==–=---r=..I/�� _.. _�'`►------- ""�'=��–�— � _.- p o �---------__. __---_ _.�_��- � - � S.W. WALNUT STREET :�: � —_— RooF oRAiN uNe SITE PLAN E � . �- . � . �- �� —••— SiORM DITCH CENTER LINE m � . _ . ____-.__ - — — LL — VEGETA7ED CORRIDOR AOUNORY � /\ -•—•—•- SLOPE BREAK � " O PROJECT: 75020.000 o VC' VEGETATED CORRIDOR PLOTS DATE: � 0' 30' 60' 120' FIGURE: AUGUST 2007 RIP-RAP � � � � � 50' ENHANCEMENi AREA � SCALE: 1'=60' � •NO7E: ENNANCEMENT AREA = 27,418 50. Fi. Q > J J i � � o�' � � , � �° i � � cuv�� ► s Exhibit D: Neighborhood Meeting Materials Tualatin Valley Fire & Rescue Walnut Street Fire Station . o plannin$ �{YOUp LAND USE PLANNING • TRANSPORTATION PLANNING • PROJECT MANAGEMENT � February 20,2007 Re: Proposal for a new Tualatin Valley Fire and Rescue (TVF&R) Fire Station at 12585 SW Walnut Street(please see attached Viciniry Map) Dear Interested Party: Angelo Planning Group is representing T'VF8cR, the owner of the properry located at 12585 SW Walnut Street (2S104AD04500). The pxoperty owner is considering proposing the construction of an 11,380 square foot fire station on the southeast portion of the lot. The expansion of Jack Park onto the remainder of the property may be possible in the future. These proposed developments are subject to Type III Conditional Use Review in the City of Tigard. Prior to applying to the Ciry of Tigard for the necessaty land use approvals,we would like to discuss the proposal in more detail with the surrounding properry owners and residents. You are cordially invited to attend a meeting: � Tuesday,March 13,2007 Charles F.Tigard Elementary School 12850 SW Grant Street Tigard, Oregon 7:00 pm to 9:00 pm Please note that this will be an informational meeting on preliminary plans. These plans may be altered prior to the submittal of the application to the City. I look forward to more specifically discussing the proposal with you. Please call me at (503) 227-3664 if you have any questions. Regards, � rank Angelo Project Planner NEIGHBORHOOD MEETING INFORMATION �� As part of the development review process foi most land use applications,the City of Tigard � requires that developers hold a neighborhood meeting to notify and discuss with property owners in the area,their proposed development Below are some frequendy asked questions , � � about the neighborhood meeting pxocess. �1HAT IS THE PURPOSE OF THIS NEIGHBORHOOD MEETING? The purpose of the meeting is to allow the prospective developer to share with you what they aze planning to do. This is your opportunity to become informed of their proposed denelopment and to let them know what issues or concerns you have in regazd to their proposal. WHAT HAPPENS AFTER THE NEIGHBORHOOD MEETINGa After the neighborhood meeting, the praspective developer finalizes the.i.t submittal package (often taking into account citizen concerns) and submits an application to the City. Sometimes it takes a while before the developez's application is ready to submit,so there could be sevexal months between the neighborhood meeting and the submittal of an application. Once an application is submitted to the City, Staff reviews it for completeness. Once an application has been deemed cornplete,the formal application review begins. It takes appxoximately 6-8 weeks from the time the application is accepted for a decision to be made. Many types of applications zequire a public hearing at which citizens are given the oppoxtunity to provide comments os concems. Property owners within 500 feet will be notified after a complete application is submitted. They will be provided an opportunity to comment. Any appeals aze decided based on the provisions of applicable laws and the development code. �HAT IF THE PROPOSAL PRESENTED AT THE NEIGHBORHOOD MEETING IS NOT WHAT IS ACTUALLY SUBMITTED? Applicants aze not required to submit exacdy what was presented at the neighborhood meeting if it generallp follows the type of development proposed. This provides for the oppominity to address the neighborhood issues and address other changes necessitated by the development or staff. If the project is significandy different,a ne�av neighborhood meeting would be required as determuled by staff. HOW DO I KNOW WHAT ISSUES ARE VALID? A decision is reviewed based on compliance with the Tigard Development Code. Beview the aty's develapmant cod�ta familiariZe your.relf with what u permitted and u�hat may not be pe�mitted A copy of the development code is available for viewing at the Tigatd City Library, on the Cit�s web site at www.ci.ti�ard.or.us, or a copy may be purchased at the Community Development Services counter. You may also contact citq planning staff and ask what the standards are for a specific issue. Be prepared,however,that pou ma�not LIKE all the standards,but at least pou know what. they are. If a development meets the code standatds,it can proceed. For your assistance, attached is a list compiled of helpful questions to ask that may assist you in determining your position on a particular proposal. Page 3 � QUESTIONS TO ASK OF TYPICAL NEIGHBORHOOD � CONCERNS, TO MAKE SURE YOUR CONCERNS ARF � CONSIDERED . The following is a list of questions intended to aid you in formulating your own questions for � ' � proposed development in your area. Feel ftee to ask more or alte=the questions to address your own uni ue concems and intexests. PROCESS / What applications are you (the developei) applping for? When do you expect to submit the application(s) so that neighbors can review it� What changes or additions are e$pected prior to submittal? / Will the decision on the application be made by City Staff,Hearings Officer,Planning Comtnission or City Counc,il? How long is the process? (timinp� ► At what point ia the process are citizens given notice and the.opportunity to provide input? / Has a pre-application conference been held with City of Tigard staff? ■ Have any pxeliminary requirements been addressed or have any critical issues been identified? ■ What city planner did you speak with regarding this project? (I'his person is generally the plannex assigned to the land use case and the one to contact for additional information). STREETS / Will there be a tra€fic study done? What is the preliminary traffic unpacts anticipated as a result of the development and how do you propose to mitigate the impacts if necessary? / What st�eet improvements ('including sidewalks)ate proposed? What connections to existing streets are proposed? / Are streets proposed to be public or private? What aze the proposed street and sidewalk widths? / What ate the emergency access requirements and what is proposed to meet those requirements? ZONING AND DENSTTY / What is the current zoning? What uses aze allowed under this zoning? 1 Will there be a re-zone requested bp the developer? If yes,to what zone? / How many units aze proposed fox the development and what is the m;*+;mum and maximum nu.mbex of units allowed in the zone? DRAINAGE AND WATER OUALITY � ► What is your erosion control and drainage plan? What is the natural slope of the property? What ate the 8��g P�S? ► Is there a water quality facility planned witbin the development and where will it be located? Who will own and maintain the facility? TREES AND LANDSCAPINC ► What are the tree removal plans and what is proposed to mitigate foi trees removed? 1 What are the landscaping plans? What buffering ox fencing is required and/or proposed? �1DDITIONAL INFORMATION ► How do I request more information or a follow-up meeting from/with the applicant? i:\cuipin\mastert\nrighbochood meeting�\nughbochood meeting inEormation_quations.doc Page 4 I - � -- —, __1_ _.� � Tf Tf �- �"'�� ` ' I I '_ - � _.�_'_.. '�_' `��' _ � y ,__�,_ �_'__ ` '�.�,.. � __�. �'__' ` _ ` � C�� O `L__"-_" l._._._� _-�---- --� � � _. - -- - - �°0000 000aoa o ,� ' I i -� - i � I --�_.__L___ �--1- -.. -- -- -�---_ � --r- --- - - -- ' __ Jack �, ��____ ;�-- _ – � - - --- Park — t.-- � �� , ,_,`- ___ ___ i � ,--� = ,, -- �_� � f-- _ � �, - � --- ' f_ - --- , t � , ;;/ ;� ___ � , � i � -----� � , i E / ,, � i --_ I�_._._r—,�. __ r _--— � � — y � � '�� I � � � . � � ----- ___.. __ i� � _-_ __ , _-- �_ ; � ��_ ___ �� _ ' � � . ; ------I--------}� i _J �.__�----i----1-_ �� ; I r` __` ____- '� I --- .__i� (, � --- --___ _ ---- --- - _ _ _. _ ----- � � I � �___---r-�--i-____ -.�-- __ � i I --- i� � j j I � I �-- , ____, ____� � J i i �, —1 � — — !-- ' --a -- _ 1--- � ��- II .-��._ ' I �-- ��._ -,-._,_-�\ �____L_1- � _ �---�--- I -,-1 � ;- _ --�,_:�_ , ; � I ' _______ 11 h I � ' �--�__-�-- --�--- � L �_. ;_____;- - !�_� I i ' � i ' _ i I 112585;SW Walnu St ---_----- , I_ _�_i--T_--i---�-- I (2S'I04AD0450 ) ! --� - ' -� ; � � - ' ---_�___----- - ___ __1�_- I -- -- -� i Tr r ;? i , -- � , � ! ii � ! ' i -{ i � _ - _ . l _ _, ' , � i � � -- , ,- r e n� — `___ _ 200 ' 0 20o aoo �eet � i N � .� �- �� _ � --r ---� i r .�'E �°� �; I ��;, �� a- � � , � �°. �,�� , � �.�- � � � - - ,�,� � . � � y`� .� � � �; � � t = � , �, _ , , +;�;� , ` ` �. -. w _ _ � ., "�'`� , ''-' - � �. �� `.�: �i l �!- � ' ,��" � _ ��,^ ��. . ,. �»� ,�`:.��`-� ''.� ,_�� ; ' JackPark = � ��s �� .:�;� � � � , •��' :t �°s ='�t`.� '_. �- ��,- .�`a . Q • .�' �.. .�. �— � s , � �� ' : �. � =°�1> �, � � ��' ' :t�l► � �,;��^'� c� �� Q Marie Ct • � �' �; - Tualatin Valley �� „ �� :�- '� _ - PYre 8t Rescue ,�E ��'�._ , �� _� _ ".�' � • �. � j � � ' . www.tvfr.com � `�"�. ',�;�- - � ...� �', �,� �;� � �,:_-� � _ . � �,r� �. �` .�: �, � ,%� . , - Command & Business Center _ . �' ,� �_ � � _ �`� 20665 SW Blanton Street • ; �� a�- y - � . �r � Aloha, OR 97007-1042 �.; =�..� � 'f •• �j ` � r ' ' � � "+o� Phone 503-649-8577 ��- ��- � _. . '� ' "' "_; �� /!'' Walnut St �� '� w �� - � �i.;.�.. E;,,� • � � � �%' ' �� ' � . f �.'.�. � - � The solid white line represents approximately where the new fire station will be sited. � � • .:, ��A�'tJ .� � ��, � ' r' y • • • , �`i. r� `i"� • •. �� • • � �� " • � � � • � '�"Tr"� ,�wd • � � �� ; ,► l • � �''. � ; � . . �-• �, Are there Other Options? Who Will be Served By this Station? Questions and Answers TVF&R has attempted several less costly Once operational, this fire station will About Your New Fire Station methods to meet our response goal. serve north and northwest Tigard Several years ago we added second units to (including Summer Lake), north and surrounding fire stations in South Beaverton, northeast Bull Mountain, and portions How is this Fire Station Funded? Progress, and King City. 'I'his helped but did of southern Beaverton (Progresf Ridge �' Citizens voted in November 2006 to not stop the degradation of response times. Barrolv.r Road). approve TVF&R's $77.5-million bond Additionally, 'I'�7F&R improved the technol- measure. A portion of the proceeds ogy that ciispatches our engine companies. When Will the Station be Built? from the sale of those bonds will be This improved our "reflex time" — the time TVF&R and the City of Tigard are used to construct this fire station and from when 9-1-1 dispatchers send the alarm working together on this project. The purchase apparatus and equipment. to a station until fire engines begin to roll. fire station will feature a larger than Even with these investments, our response normal communiry room. In addition Why Build a Fire Station Hete? times do not meet our goal in your commu- to the fire station, the property will The community surrounding this site nity. eventually include parking and access has some of the longest response times for Jack Park. The enhanced commu- of any urban area in our district. When � \ � nity room will feature a view of the an incident occurs, emergency crews ,��, park. Consttucrion of the fire station is must travel from stations located in expected to begin in the summer of south Beaverton, downtown Tigard, �i 2007. King City, the Progress area, or at the ' , top of Cooper Mountain. As the num- � If you have other quesrions regarding "�. ber of homes, incidents, and traffie ` _ ��f this fire station, please contact has increased in this area, we � �,�` Community Liaison Storm Smith at struggle to meet our goal of having a - '�`� 503-356-�4713 or storm.smith@tvfr.com. first unit on scene within 6 minutes, 90% of the time. ° ' �' �- � Are Response Times Important? Were Other Locations Considered? Having a unit on scene within 6 min- We explored several alternative locations, but utes allows emergency responders to they were unsuitable due to being odd-size � take life- and property-saving measures flag lots or on sloping ground, and they while there's still tune. Our typical required extensive tree removal. Computer Tualatin Valley response time into your neighbor- models (accurate within a '/4 mile) make Flre & Reseue hood was 8 minutes 22 seconds in it clear that the Walnut Street location is WWW,tvfr.00171 2005. Some adjacent areas are ex- the most effective and suitable site, not periencing response time as high as only for your neighborhood but for many Cor�,mand&Busines5 c��,r�r 9-10 minutes.That's not acceptable. surrounding neighborhoods and buSi- 20G65 SW Blanton Stre�t _11oha,OR 97007-104.. nesses as well. Phone 503-649-8577 2S104AD-00500 2S104AA-90142 ABRAHAMSON BRUCE Q BEL O ERh. :LLC • �`� �A1VD SHERRY L � P�B 189 12735 SW MARIE CT Y HILL, R 97148 . TIGARD,OR 97223 2S104AD-03505 2S104AA-80191 AUGUST THOMAS A&SUSAN A BE O TERRACE LLC 12810 SW WALNUT ST PO B 89 TIGARD,OR 97223 Y HILL, R 97148 2S1 D-03502 2S104AA-90131 AU ST OMAS A&SUSAN A BELL O TERRACE LLC 128 WALNUT ST PO BO 89 T ARD,O 97223 YA ILL, 97148 2S104AD-00900 2S104AA-90182 BARMETTLER KEVIN P/MARY C BEL 00 RRACE LLC 12790 SW MARIE CT PO BO 9 TIGARD,OR 97223 YA LL, R 97148 � 2S104AA-90202 2S1036G10400 BASTIN JOHN C BLUE HERON PARK HOMEOWNERS ASSOC PO BOX 231086 PO BOX 231263 TIGARD,OR 97281 PORTLAND,OR 97281 2S103BB-00600 2S 38C-10200 BECKER HOWARD H OLIVE AN BLU E PARK HOMEOWNERS ASSOC 12555 SW 124TH • PO B 1263 TIGARD,OR 97223 P TLAND, R 97281 2S103BG10100 2S103BC-103 BEER DONALD E d�JANET L BL HE N PARK HOMEOWNERS ASSOC 12765 SW BLUE NERON PL PO B 1263 TIGARD,OR 97223 TLAND, R 97281 2S104AA-90000 2S704AD-00800 B LWOO TERRACE CONDOMINIUMS BRAZER GREG R 8 ELIZABETH A OW OF UNITS 12770 SW MARIE CT TIGARD,OR 97223 2S104AA-90151 2S104AD-01300 BELLWOOD TERRACE LLC BROWN DOUGLAS L PO BOX 189 STEPHANIE L YAMHILL,OR 97148 12725 SW WALNUT TIGARD,OR 97223 2 104AA-90171 2S1036C-08600 BEL OOD RRACE LLC BURTZOS SANDRA L PO BO 9 12790 SW BLUE HERON PL YA ILL, 97148 TIGARD,OR 97223 2S103BC-09600 251038B-01100 BYLES NANCY FAMILY REVOC LIVING DAVIS MELISSA D ` �Y BYLES NANCY JO TRS 12465 SW 124TH AVE 12895 SW BLUE HERON PL TIGARD,OR 97223 , TIGARD,OR 97223 2S1038C-04000 2S103B&01500 CAMERON DONNA IRENE DONOVAN RUTH REVOCABLE 12490 SW WALNUT ST LIVING TRUST TIGARD,OR 97223 12480 SW BROOK CT TIGARD,OR 97223 � 2S104AD-03900 2S1D3BC-04300 CARLTON MARK M�BRENDA G DOWNS JAMES R 12600 SW WALNUT ST 12380 SW WALNUT ST TIGARD,OR 97223 TIGARD,OR 97223 2S103BC-04800 2S1036B-00800 CHONG KAREN L 8 JOHN DURHAM STEVEN W�SHELLEY L PO BOX 231053 12525 SW 124TH AVE � PORTLAND,OR 97281 TIGARD,OR 97223 � 2S104AD-01800 2S103BC-05003 CONNOR CATHLEEN P EBNER DARIUS 12655 SW 128TH AVE 1260 12TH TIGARD,OR 97223 WEST LINN,OR 97068 2S104AA-00300 25104AD-01000 w CROMWELL SAMUEL T ENDICOTT JOHN A . MARGARET A 12730 SW 128TH AVE 12665 SW 127TH TIGARD,OR 97223 TIGARD,OR 97223 � 2S104AD-01400 2S103BB-D8100 CRONHOLM SCOTT M ENGLISH JAMES d� 12705 SW WAWUT HAYES JEANETTE TIGARD,OR 97223 12600 SW 124TH TIGARD,OR 97223 2S1 D-03504 2S103BC-04800 CUL LL L IE D AND FORD WILLIAM H 3 SHEILA C DIAN 12675 SW 124TH 128 SW LNUT TIGARD,OR 97224 TI RD,OR 97223 2S104AD-03503 2S1038G04700 CULWELL LESLIE D/DIANNA L FRANCO HECTOR S 12800 SW WALNUT ST 12705 SW 124TH AVE TIGARD,OR 97223 TIGARD,OR 97223 2S1036C-09300 2S703B6-00400 DAVIS ALISON K FRANZEN NORMAN R 12880 SW BLUE HERON PL JANET E • TIGARD,OR 97223 12605 SW 124TH TIGARD,OR 97223 2S103BC-05004 2S104AD-04000 FURST EDGAR&ANNA TRUSTEES JONES DAVID R 8,....r L � 'f3850 SW BONNIE BRAE CT 12570 SW WALNUT ST BEAVERTON,OR 97005 TIGARD,OR 97223 2S1036G09500 2S104AD-00300 GOODRICH SHARLENE M JONES JAIMI SARA 12900 SW BLUE HERON PL 12775 SW MARIE CT TIGARD,OR 97223 TIGARD,OR 97223 2S1D3BC-04400 2S103BG09400 HAMES BEVERLY J JUMONVILLE COLLEEN E PO BOX 23115 12890 SW BLUE HERON PL TIGARD,OR 97281 TIGARD,OR 97223 2St 038G08700 2S103B&00500 HANSEN ROBERT M�KATHLEEN M KELLY PATRICIA M d�MARLEEN MARY 12800 SW BLUE HERON PL 12565 SW 124TH TIGARD,OR 97223 TIGARD,OR 97223 2S103BB-05700 2S1D4AD-01100 HARTFIELD LEE E AND APRIL L KERR LORI L 12500 SW 124TH 12760 SW 128TH AVE TIGARD,OR 97223 TIGARD,OR 97223 2S103BG08500 2S1038C-03800 HAWES DIANE S KESSLER MARGUERITE E 12780 SW BLUE HERON PL 12425 SW ALBERTA TIGARD,OR 97223 TIGARD,OR 97223 2S103BB-0090Q 2S104AD-01800 HOLCOMB FREDERICK P KLEFFNER THOMAS ANTHOMf 12515 SW 124TH AVE PERRI FRANCIS TIMOTHY TIGARD,OR 97223 4975 SW 65TH AVE PORTLAND,OR 97221 2S104AD-04400 2510388-01000 ISAACSON GARLA KLEVE RUSSELL C 12520 SW WALNUT ST 12475 SW 124TH AVE TIGARD,OR 97223 TIGARD,OR 97223 2S104AD-03501 2S103BCA9000 JAM CHRISTOPHER M 8� KOOS RONALD l GRAHAM LAURA J 12850 SW BLUE HERON CT 12820 SW WALNUT ST TIGARD,OR 97223 TIGARD,OR 97223 2S103BC-09800 2S104A0-034ot JELINEK GARY L LEWIS FAMILY REV TRUST • 12$05 SW BLUE HERON PL BY LEWIS BRIAN CLARKE/CHRISTINE CA TIGARD,OR 97223 12828 SW WALNUT ST TIGARO,OR 97223 2S704AD-02000 2S104AD-04900 LU RANDY S/LORNA K MOORE CAROLYN REV LIV TRUST ` 12605 SW 128TH BY CAROLYN MOORElTERRY HAUCK TRS TIGARD,OR 97223 1211 SW 5TH AVE#1700 PORTLAND,OR 97204 2S103BB-08000 2S104AD-00701 MAAG WAYNE H MURPHY DENNIS D AND ALTA L MARY A 12580 SW 124TH 12750 SW MARIE CT TIGARD,OR 97223 TIGARO,OR 97223 2S1036G05002 2S104AD-02700 MAHONEY ELAINE MURPHY RONALD V&CATHERINE L do EBNER DARIUS WOLFGANG 12915 SW WALNUT 1260 12TH ST TIGARO,OR 97223 WEST LINN,OR 97068 2S1038B-05900 2S1036G04100 MANAHAN WILLIAM D 6 CHARLENE A MURPHY SHARON V 12550 SW 124TH AVE 12470 SW WALNUT TIGARD,OR 97223 TIGARD,OR 97223 2S104AD-03500 2S104AD-03700 MCLEOD JOYCE& NESS STEPHEN 8 JONA SAFFORD AUDREY G 12730 SW WALNUT ST 229 E WARREN COMMON TIGARD,OR 97223 FREMONT,CA 94539 2S103BC-04500 2S104AD-04200 MCLIT REAL ESTATE LLC OLSON DENNIS D 12360 SW WALNUT ST 12540 SW WALNUT AVE TIGARD,OR 97223 TIGARD,OR 97223 251036C-09100 2S104A0-04100 MEIKLE FREDERICK C III OLSON DENNIS D& 12860 SW BLUE HERON PL BONNIE LOUISE - TIGARD,OR 97223 12540 SW WALNUT ST TIGARD,OR 97223 2S�04AA-04900 2S704AD-03800 MENDEZ MARCOS OLSON KATHLEEN A$NORRIS A 12600 SW 127TH AVE 13660 SW ASH AVE TIGARD,OR 97223 TIGARD,OR 97223 2S103BB-05800 25104AD-01700 MINER MARGARET K ORNELAS JEREMY&JENNIFER 12470 SW 124TH AVENUE 12705 SW 128TH AVE TIGARD,OR 97223 TIGARD,OR 97223 2S104AD-01900 2St038C-08800 MONTOYA ALICIA BOTTELO 8� PENNER JOHN M 8 LILLIAN A NIEVES FIED�MONTOYA 12830 SW BLUE HERON PL 12625 SW 128TH AVE TIGARD,OR 97223 TIGARD,OR 97223 2S104AD-02601 2S103BC-09700 PETTERSON THOMAS W/PAULINE M FA SMITH MARGARE� ... � Y'HOMAS W/PAULINE M PETTERSEN TRS 12885 SW BLUE HERON PL 12921 SW WALNUT ST TIGARD,OR 97223 . TIGARD,OR 97223 2S1036C-10000 2S104AD-03802 PLINSKI CHRISTIE M SMITH NANCY SELINA 12775 SW BLUE HERON PL 12630 SW WALNUT ST TIGARD,OR 97223 TIGARD,OR 97223 2S�04AQ00800 2S1038C-09200 QUEAHPAMA RALPH G&MICHELLE K STEVENSON JOOY H c/o LEE KENNETH&DEANNA 12870 SW BLUE HERON PL 12730 SW MARIE CT TIGARD,OR 97223 TIGARD,OR 97223 2S104AD-01500 2S104AD-01200 RASMUSSEN VENETA M d� TAYLOR JAMES D PAUL VICTOR 12745 SW WALNUT ST 12755 SW 128TH • TIGARD,OR 97223 TIGARD,OR 97223 " 2S1038C-04200 2S104AA-00400 RAU JULIE M THIES JOHN A JR&JULIA M 12430 SW WALNUT ST 12555 SW 127TH AVE TIGARD,OR 97223 TIGARD,OR 97223 ssioa�+o-oozoo 2 03B&U83 ROHR RICHARO A TIG ITY OF 1107 SITKA AVE 131 HALL BLVD NEWBERG,OR 97132 ARD,O 97223 2St 04AA-04800 2S104AA-04 RUSSELL DAVID E II&DENISE M TI R ITY OF 12500 SW 12TTN AVE 131 W HALL BLVD TIGARD,OR 97223 T ARD, R 97223 2S104AD-04300 2S7 AD-0450 SEVERSON EVERETT O TIGA OF cJo DENNIS OISON 1312 ALL BLVD 12540 SW WALNUT TI RD,O 97223 TIGARD,OR 97223 2S1 U38C-04900 2S104A0.00400 SHULTS BRUCE L TORRES ROSENDO HERNANDEZ& 12625 SW 124TH BOTELLO MARIA ODILIA TIGARD,OR 97223 12755 SW MARIE CT TIGARD,OR 97223 2S704AD-00100 2S 1 o4AD-04500 SMITH JAMES W/MAXINE 7UALATIN VALLEY FIRE&RESCUE 12600 SW 128TH 2O665 SW BLANTON ST TIGARD,OR 97223 ALOHA,OR 97007 . 2S103BC-08900 2S103BB-03301 VANBEBBER SUZANNE YANDLE FAMILY KEVOCABLE TRUST �`� �1L840 SW BLUE HERON PL BY JOHN C/HEATHER A YANDLE TRS TIGARD,OR 97223 2804 MISSION COLLEGE BLVD SANTA CLARA,CA 95054 2S104AA-9D181 2S103BB-00700 WAKEFIELD ANDREW B YINGER FAMILY REVOC TRUST 12658 SW KAREN ST#18 ' BY KENT UDEBORAH L YINGER TRS TIGARD,OR 97223 12545 SW 124TH AVE PORTLAND,OR 97223 2S104AA-04700 . 2S103BC-09900 WATSON MITCHELL F/MARY P ZAKRZEWSKI CHAPIN ORR 29650 NW OLSON RD 12T85 SW BLUE HERON PL GASTON,OR 97119 TIGARD,OR 97223 2S103BG05001 WING LOUIE FAMILY LIMITED PARTNE PO BOX 86404 PORTLAND,OR 97206 2S10388-05800 . WINKLER LbUANE/MARIE B 12520 SW 124TH AVE TIGARD,OR 97223 2S104AA-05200 WINSTON MARK 6 WINSTON ZSUZSANNA 14925 SW 100TH AVE TtGARD,OR 97224 2S�ouu►.ost o0 W STO RK b ZSUZSANNA ' 1492 100TH AVE T RD, R 97224 ' 2S -0 WI RK 8 ZSUZSANNA 149 100TH AVE ARD,0 97224 2S104AD-029o0 WIRTHLIN JOSEPH E 12919 SW WALNUT TIGARD,OR 97223 2S1038C-08400 • WOOD JOANNE 12770 SW BLUE HERON PL TIGARD,OR 97223 �� Brooks Gaston � 3206 Princess _ • Edinburg, TX 78539 Don & Dorothy Erdt � 13760 SW 121 st Avenue Tigard, OR 97223 � _� Ellen Beilstein 14630 SW 139"�Avenue Tigard, OR 97224 � Martha Bishop 10590 SW Cook Lane Tigard, OR 97223 Vanessa Foster 13085 SW Howard Drive Tigard, OR 97223 Susan Beilke 11755 SW 114�Place Tigard, OR 97223 CPO 46 16200 SW Pacific Highway,Suite H242 Tigard, OR 97224 Patricia Keerins 12195 SW 121st Avenue Tigard, OR 97223 John Frewing 7110 SW Lola Lane Tigard, OR 97223 Gretchen Buehner 13249 SW 136� Plaoe Tigard, OR 97224 f 1'T'V AG TIl:AR11 _ fFYTQAI IYTGRCCTF(1 plIOTIC� Ii•1n��rnlnl�ah��llel+elel(`IT!`n�+iw�lrliv.l I IDI'IATCfI• �')-��"�-n� AFFIDAVIT OF MAILING/POSTING NEIGHB4RHOOD MEETING NOTICE .vIPORTANT NOTICE: THE APPLICANT IS REQLTIRED TO MAIL THE QTY OF TIGARD A COPY OF THE NEIGHBORHOOD MEETING NOTICE THAT PERTAINS TO THIS AFFIDAVIT AT THE SAME TIME PROPERTY OWNERS ARE MAILED NOTICE,TO THE ADDRESS BELOW: City of Tigard Planning Division 13125 SW Hall Boulevard Tigard,OR 97223-8189 IN ADDITION,THE APPLICANT SHALL SUBMIT THIS AFFIDAVIT&COPIES OF ALL NOTICES AT THE TIME OF APPLICATION. MAILING: I,_1/�T1�4��1JE P��W ,being dulyswom,depose and saythat on the ?2t,1D dayof�iAa2Y , 20_ �,I caused to have mailed to each of the persons on the attached list,a notice of a meeting to discuss a proposed developme at (or near) 115P1-� S�N WM-�t�l.T STi�i�T' `1S10►�kADOy.,4��T�{�OR. �i�22�a copyof which notice so mailed is attached hereto and made a part of hereof. I further state that said notices were enclosed in envelopes plainly addressed to said persons and were deposited on the date indicated above in the United States Post Office located at b'j-� �W MAdN ST POF�'��•�� O� q�R�� , with postage prepaid thereon. gnature (In the p ence of a Notary Public) POSTING: F��1►1K- D�.Sf1'E1.0 ,do affirm thac I am(represent�the partyinitiating interest in a proposed land use application _or��EW �[V F#.(t F�R E St'p.-1-1O�1 affecting the land located at(state the approximate location(s)IF no address(s)and all tax lot(s)currendy registered)l�a ,SW WA�u.�vT SrR�rt (?��p�Fp„ppy.�oa1 �� , �- q�2� ,and did on the 24- day of�g.0 n�.i( ,20Q� pe�onallypost notice indicating that the site maybe proposed for a C01,1Di7l��.lAeL Us� land use application,and the time, date and place of a neighborhood meeting to discuss the proposal. The sign was posted�f, A,Lo�.l,[, �TktE �w1T Pp-dPCIZ,-i`� U►.bF (state locauon you posted notice on propert}� Si nature (In e presence of a Notary Public) (THIS SECTION FOR A STATE OF OREGON,NOTARY PUBLIC TO COMPLETE/NOTARIZE) STATE OF �.��Q,�. County of M�4.tm.v.�.a�.� ) ss. Subscribed and swom/affirmed before me on the �31� day of Moc,c,�.(Z. ,20�. �y OFFICIAL SEAL �, KAREN SIEGEL ;�' NOTARY PUBUC-OREGON • .'' '� COMMISSION NO.379616 Q�,� MY COMMISSION EXPIRES JUNE 5,2008 NOTARY PUBLIC OF C�iON My Commission Expires: ,�,c,�.,,,,` 5 � �i o p c\cucpin\masurs\neighborhood mee[ings\affidavic of rtuiling-pos[ing aeighborhood meeting,doc Page 5 SIGN-IN SHEET Neighborhood Meeting for Proposed Tualatin Valley Fire 8 Rescue Fire Station, at at 12585 SW Walnut Street, Tuesday, March 13, 2007 7:00 p.m. to 9:00 p.m. Charles F.Tigard Elementary School 12859 SW Grant Street Tigard, Oregon. Name Address Telephone and/or Email (optional) W 0�/ V O I`w'/ l/`{r �1 c11-� D O V �u VD t wq�!��1' ( r++ G A,�5 OD 1�a��3��s ' 9 9�8/ �avt ou,. W� i 2.q7p S� t�!a-A�:V �S�r. 5D 3 -54 0- 3 4 �a- rJ -�',,+,t � ,� � f� �" /25 2/ 5 4� �?✓T 5i .SZ 3 S}O lGa-3 �v G��d- 11. c�o SO 3 �SS D �1�76 ;s � S �J3 S l U I 0 -�-r'�R t �C-<,,., � 1 2 S �S �`-� 3 � �► r l7�nt .� S'° 3 - �-� 9 _ 7r i� k i x - � Tualatin Valley Fire & Rescue Neighborhood Meeting TVF&R Walnut Street Station Tuesday, March 13, 2007 Cha�les F. Tigard Elementary School 12850 SW Grant Street Tigard, Oregon 7:00 pm to 9:OOpm AGENDA 7:04 PM to 9:00 PM Welcome Storm Smith, Tualatin Valley Fire & Rescue Project Introduction Frank Angelo, Angelo Planning Group Review of Walnut Street Station Developmenf Concept Hans Ettlin Peck Smiley Ettlin Architecfs City of Tigard— Jack Park Dennis Koellermeier City of Tigard Public Works Director Questions and Discussion Af� Next Steps Frank Angelo ! ._ ro s�e��o....,� • V SWITUt+WN�+OtF�' . . _ O 1 �.N-717.'16' 6bEC�� nfi D'U.�O.'� '� ZI"pEC�D. O `i �0� 1 ,F�B��fa'(sw�ar).2e!.�e' , ',.��.� .��zx'rue�. K E . •� �� ,-� �� m � ; e'oec�v ,.' . .-� i � '�.+��' �"� � �,� vo'ria�I i fi�OEC�D �I � � / V� � iy�:uo '..l�.� / / f I� �� .iE:I10.36' �"�'� .y I { � I ' N'nR� � � . '/ a�Cu .�. . 'DP'� /' i �� i IE.2'.0 60 � �.' �i�/ Ih /[C K �� I � . . 2 �pp6l��^/%��.' �.� . I ! S r I l E Y L jz . � . _ 6'L`EC�D y �}e � E T T�1 N 6"OLC� 2a C4P . ' / .'G� � 1 �c�i��c�� E=20tl.27� -~ �.' . /.'� '� / �. e'�eon .� � �c� � 6DCCi0 6"GEC�D��.� �.•..• fi DEGiD . ��✓� .•' �� .. � ' I 40,�3 , �i}{. �' "� .'. .�,'/./ �.�... � � r�nu�woai O • � . �� '// � �/ .� ' I � � _""`�—.•_��o�;e•�ROti�:oo .`. �`,� a '.y' �'�• .�� . • �� M /� 1 � / �� .. ��/ — I � �• � �" . .�' ... O .�� .. / . . 'i � ' .', . .yV . I S ,�� ' . . ./�� . • ' 2 . ,. . �,�• � .. �,� � M1A ' ,� � q�' . � ' •__l__� .. ,.�w .. ' yo� w � �o�s g �/ � uvcc�o � f ;... .. _ _ „a„��► i / �.�. . .� �.,�. / r_ �N ... , ..:. � z ' Y6EC . � �•'.'.' .,..� ' Ex�� >.w � � . _ .....� �� SITE P � ' _ � , _.___ .. � . < , � ,:��.��,�.,� , �—('- ,---�. -- PCAY�NEN1 DRAIN�GF : � � � ,.I .. ...� AND CONSEM�i�ON /� • .�. .� � � . .. '-- I � � �, , �'' .. .. ,, E�SENENI � �'/'. .' �J ' . R(�M _ , cou�+uNmr . a� C �, . r---"iir __.. ` ��n �" �t'' M.r,.' � ezI$�i�c ' ,'� r�nre ' v�i � '\ :��.a R �,i•� .i 9Nk�iNG � � - __ — ! N� / I .�'. '. j� ..... ' �'_"'J �. . ' � / 3BS _ .. PARKNO � �� .. -��;�.�� ,� . '� . / � . r'sHd�-{�' I ri-. - ..... . . ....._... � � o n f i {o- '�'� � - / . - �Lp�.11d_.'i � — - TMREE�AAY I t,� � �{$ // ./'/ �/� ''tp /. 6•DECID .�� FNiE$TATION - O s � O VO ��.. / . /.' .. ' .' ' j/ —- 113EO Sf. i � / . .�. ,j ..�� ' •' ,.� . .� / � �� ` _ . .... . . ...; �� .... ! / '. . -:i��.�;�'/'. . .'. ' .'/� t ��1` - . _— � / � . �'"G � :.,�� ./' h I__' _ ' '_ ,. '�. V �.� .. . � .'VERMWCM�OMM✓GC .. ..-� �r ... . . _ . �, .__ V Mf(W✓11!OI.E :' iM1iqN�� . ''� .� `i . ,, . . .._.... .ANO CONST. ' , _ —' � RW�3t]65' j� /. UlSfMENT . / �y' II D C�D �y I i. h 2P fb . — — 1 BMQ9 I � i NO[a iC 8 5J�2tp 18 �. �` . . � •. m �c e-�w-rer�.n�;�, t ;i . • vi2,23�S.F. r�f — ,- � � it e'�[)-�ia f::k � ; _��.�� '� '�� (3.25 ACRES).. 5°Nas, , _ - � 1 � � __. sry!- ;' ��e�� [ w�},"r 0 0 '�/ f ' " �XE � � � . , �a , ; , . ' q ��f.f` i 4�H� �N3713'it �p�v �E ��ID RW.1j6.�• 1 ' QoNCkfSL , EX � � . EB I (SE)-7l1.70 � VO� RCfAIMpENG W�l}• 4EI4NJ19 WKL ��. ,�'l �(,�'� F'�� 5 _ Ui L iv..�/ S ON NOD ___' MEN1 � , ' .�I� LONCREIE ' /. • : .� . ', . �� . H0,E. _ " rl -0��'CV�VERT . . .• .' '�tN 11 SiORM LLWwOLE � -Rf2�6.0✓/ • � : .� �' E'�STONE EK�S'YG _'_�� - � .. ... � �o� � ��39]? r 5 4M4 . � 1E` � �1 .137. � , E 17;�M1 RiM.2M.40' - .'I. ..� . . .' MET/iMlING WILL•� ANO Vi � '7 �� IE 17 � �E 1Y(W)�7N 90. ,°z .�.� _T� .�.__�._——r-—————.�. .. ,} FASEMEN . i rEN.O`f � _ ' ... . 0 iE f]'(C)�I1�.)5 . +�.. ..� . . . �. �. . ..... r � .. i . 2• / f , � .. �.;.. -',� ....,. ..,.,..�_,.'O:.-.. �..�.�„�1 .._-:. — / �pyE3�.R�wMANH . �, OW B4G. / O`, N-D J] S69'tb 00 �� ,{ ��., �..i "�. . .... ........�..4.. ., __.. -_ ._. v.__ /� � C/i.�iE.:.:J.SS' 4 ,,I I ' .. '/'.. ..' ;b. ' ..... CM�,':��... . rp R ��. .. I l '. ' .. � �. iP � IRANS . �' y ��wM- .9' �Ea :32D�e p � � / j �� [e uv y4?9d'ao�v i•i.o�' . � . .. . ,�a5.oa: � �lI / NET00'OU"k . �.. '�. Lp� .. 'a., '.15=217� . . � STORM IMNiKKE : �• r ti� q p��;�=. --. _ �,;��_ � �. . �, --�" A1.1 � Ri11.72B 10 . . E 11 A�17TY — .. 9�— �� . �� . R TARr WNnOtE iC 17�(W)'22a.90� � 5.00' .'�CCE��5{[)lID RIM.27]9� R p� 5�—W�� — ..- ...__ �.5��. , _ . iE 12'(E)`�2a]5' �E i�l5)•22��:7' - �SCE � . . _' __`-- Y IM.131.39 � � ��` C/t�E•1l029' � STORM 4�N��E �IE E(A'1'7 G STREET RIM=33�.89 — _ — — �;�r,�',��o�E ----- --5�---- — w Nafi_ _ __ �E 9'IWJ`Y30.98' RINa37].6� C/L IE-1�J.»� [� -- -,w ro 5/6'N�OM FOD � SANrtAiN WNNOIE� C.7 . ' . . ' — O ,� RiN�212)fi �'RED Al ��"REOyM�F 16'.�+EC.M1L�R p ��( d B"(NW)�20�.Y6' \�' [/:�,c 8 i5W-ME)°20�.�fi 3�DIk1.t � .,'�� ,'� ,'� � �� m J'AED AtD' � � , i .fri 'aC' H�A� ��ecn e ' ► 4 ti' �0 . .� ,.'''�� I � � a.7cuv �� .��:�..'��., '.. ,.��'�: I..I�� :�rA1�o.3s' ... .� . '.• .i`� \ A9'DW6 FNl� � './. �� EaluO.W'� . . �%7� ' �.do �(/'. . � '� y .n� . 7 4 . . � � 1[[a V" (.•. . '. OB.E]�. .' ,.i� . •� S M I l L Y /I'aCC�q . ' / . '/ .... . .'1� F<�?��e,t '% ! F,^209.II� �^ /.•' ' � / 6�RE�KDE �REO '� �.'' �/ 5'RFP�V.DF � ` �� ,. '. ,� O'RGC�L'JEA % .. / 1,0� .� ...�j � � iu�W�awa� '�' �. e O � � 'D , N �� . �� i ��ro S�s'�woa ac_.. /:`' +a� � a •! . /� . � ._-_.------- � ty T .t �. � � ��" �� , • /�. 3S . p KF 18 � .�' ' .��. .. /�� ',, .'.• . ..' .•'ii , / .. . ' �.',�•'.' ' .� . �� / S 2 � � . -.�. '��•' r : . � : � ' . . �' .. ./�' '"`__i .. � � .� . � ..:w .. O a g � � Ng.r�•w�• � '� _ E PLAN B �,�„ �cG � �o . ' SIT , . �� .� ' ' .�� '" .�r. {.� ' ' '. ' - .� IXiST�NC ! �' -� G-� � G"A� Al R ..' i�.�' .� B0.4�v ' ..�.n. ' 71 �� a/ (� . . ��Y . ___ ..� -. o-- .. � .:. ., . ._.%.y�uy t � ... /� O ......... _. � -,•. /� Fn727.�'. ''� ..... I MBo�-.- - . f .-_ .... PCNWNENT ORNNAGE . �. /.� .' . � � .•� .... f°' � lJIC COMSERJALiOk /� • .'. �7� .. .� • • i/I � I .. __ f/1 e.a 0 CtlMMUN1IY � � � � EASC4EN* / �� /.. ..�' � �� ..I ' ROOM __ �� p'�f i -- �� . i � � w � � .. ,�, /. ,i ew�aHC �'� . '. !-- / / .' -�. �1� .. � � � wn / � �'%• ' �__"_J �., . I ' __3NNfy 4 . ..'.�. • � . •" . �� y�' i�''� ,A j✓ ,... . .,� � . r- - = •. ......... � o `,j. � . . = / /:� ''+ / ... .... � iP '. _ TMREEAAY � �4� � �(8 / ��'� ��/ . �i/ :' .s� Q9'�PVLf � " FIRE BT�TION � '. .. �'. '/. � /. .' ... ! . ., — I1.�16i Sf. � .' �% .�..', ' .' ' �/ "� ..' �=.P 1 I ' �� OiJ� _ ...: � ._,..,... � ...,.. .,... / . � /� � . , . . .�// `4�.��1 i I,. — I .. .. / .___ . . ,. . ,. . � i �/�CAYAMCMI .GA�[ ,j�� ., l r� _ _ ,� . "�A�Q ' � F. 3: 5 RE3) d I� i i ww�ac ��. �� , u�se�� . � F,a _ ,M >« . ..... �.6�' �_ � ", : �� . ,' ./ }�-.i. _ i i�Z _ .. p �ocp .11016. , ,' . ✓ '. . " � I .�,��y � , 1 -M),I111� '.�� : �/ ' : .� ' �' 35 �� '� 26 �i �� r� � - �': �a1�11 1 ' / Vlb v , �e /� '�. ...... - M[ �I . 9pk(S . . - .IM.76. � 4 l_. � ��a�'-�'�} ° � b "� - 0 '' V � �/ 5`�'�� / , � /. i u %pw2x'n t � '"ro mu�ape.so :��.. � A.. •. . 4/,� . -'--� fw . . . . . sq-xsi.7o CDNCFEtF , .ON�R tE H� E% �.'.M1� V�\.p•'�k•' EB �� '_ � �'1nP�_ �w um • a+�oo � w ncT�w�NC w.�,� �uwaa wKE J �i vlsiTqq�' . �`�d�. '��,'��.�s7w ueNr � .. / PMt1iWG ' � S�OR4 4ANnOlF M .•" CON[RE1E � . �: • . �,�� 5} �BbYtN�ar.- .� .�� ' �� . � Hos i � �i?(Nw)-11.1z' / yNJMOI( �.�� 2 26.G'./. ' : .' .' � E �. HG.uO�E`"�___T.�' p�� _ " .. . .. Br+G-56426'C6' or ��7'(5)'Z3381' µ'�' urts intt te..o• - I . �e. u wc w.a E N I J a iresw��j,u . I �� w)-za..uo' �.g1 . .�_� _�- - - �i � rea � :E)'P1�.75'`Y b�/ �:.�' _,. �. . . . ...... .. �' ' / . ...__ _ - �_. . pyl-OfF _ SAMitARY MAN:�OtE �. . �. .' ,..," .4 _ ., ... . . _ _ y' / � �� / / � . _;,F _.— —— ————— �' / mu_zn» ,„ r �,,, .� 9 s, � i � .. $ .,� � a \ a , z� i..% .. . . ... ta O ,�'RAY�. �_ .M E ' \.Li}.7p 19' � --�_ O 'IB �U01N 1 C" - � ....� � ., .P.185.OF1:. ' / � , � e tl0T00'OOIY� �1. : ;p C*172 . . a . ,, � � �;i A1.2 Q � —�}gpB9Yl._. E �� . ' . �yipt —_ C j` - - '. ! 5/WIRIXY W1�NOlE t 5.00' �E15�${)^RN.$2'.92� y 0.0�zt0.��yi�'-'�' �gCi� ��- PoM•117.29' -}- � •� . E ii<S)�2Zi'.02' �OE�wp�F. I � � ' _�-� �L/L�E.3lO.M' � A _ � _ � _ '__- STOA4 WNMOIE IE E(W)�2 O - — �"�'T•"•''"""°`� -S-W--_ _ WAL�R[I'1� _ ___-STREET /�'M-2]�.89' mN.277.N . ' iE 8'lWl-77(1.98' Tualatin Valley Fire 8 Rescue: Walnut Street Fire Station Neighborhood Meeting Minutes March 13, 2007 Storm Smith, TVF&R, welcomed the neighborhood members to the meeting and thanked them for their support of the recent bond issue which is making the Walnut Street fire station possible. He then introduced Frank Angelo of Angelo Planning Group. Frank read the City of Tigard's supplied statement and then described the land use process (conditional use application, completeness review, hearing in front of a hearings officer) for this application in more depth. Frank also explained that the neighborhood meeting and future application process are for the fire station only and that although there will be some discussion of Jack Park, the park would not be part of the application. He explained that, at a future date, there would be a lot line adjustment to break the fire station away from the unused portion of the lot and that portion would be used for the expansion of Jack Park. Frank then turned to the site plan board on display and explained that this site plan (Option A) is the preferred option but that there was also an Option B. He went on to explain that the main difference between the two options is the placement of the visitor parking lot and the spacing between the accesses. Frank then introduced Bob Thrapp of Peck Smiley Ettlin Architects to discuss the two options in more detail. Bob described the two options as follows: • Option A: o The center of the building will have drive-through bays for the fire trucks; o The center drive-through bays will be restricted to fire truck access only; o In designing the building they tried to minimize the size of the building to maximize the amount of space that could be dedicated to the park; o The visitor parking on the west would be shared between the fire station community room and the expanded Jack Park. o There will be parking along the east side of the building for the fire fighters and for any visitors (including emergency parking); o Parking along the west side will be shared between the fire station community room and the expanded park; o The west side access will be gated to the north to restrict access. • Option B: o The building itself is identical to the one in Option A, the biggest difference being the placement of the parking and accesses. o In an attempt to satisfy the requirements of the City's development code, the two accesses were moved as far from each other as possible. o The visitor parking lot on the west side of the structure has been moved further west which makes it closer to the park but makes necessary a longer path between the lot and the community room. • Floor Plan: the floor plan for the two options is identical: o The west side of the building contains a large community room at the north with restrooms; and o The west side will also contain an exercise room for the firefighters and space for them to work on any equipment if necessary. o The center of the building will have drive-through bays in the center for the fire trucks; o Along the east side of the building there will be dormitories and facilities for the firefighters. • Elevations: the three elevations shown would be for either option: o Tried to design a building that would fit in to the residential neighborhood and have a more rural feel; Friday, July 27, 2007 Page 1 of 5 Tualatin Valley Fire&Rescue:Wa. .t Street Fire Station Neighborhood Meeting Minutes o The portion of the building that would house the fire trucks would resemble a barn with a large red roof and would be sided with board and batten; o The station would be a sage green (typical of TVF&R buildings) and would be sided with cedar shingles; o There will be a brick base around the entirety of the building to tie it all together and there will be canopies over the entrances to ensure they are visible. o There are three versions of the roof for the drive-through bays: typical barn, pitched or a boarder barn-type roof. The meeting was then opened up for questions: Q—Will there be a fee to use the fire station community room? A — (Storm) The community room is open to all community groups for any community activity (neighborhood association or other community activity). The use of the room is encouraged by TVFBR. There is only a fee if there is a commercial aspect to the activity — for example, if an entrance fee is charged or it is a commercial activity. TVF8�R activities would be given preference over community activities for use of the room. The City of Tigard is in favor of the community room and asked TVF8�R to make the room larger which they did, effectively doubling the size to approximately 1000 square feet. Q—Can the room be split in half? A— (Storm) Yes, the room can be divided in half. Each room would have its own access, bathroom and sink. Q —Which option is preferred? A — (Frank) Option A is preferred. Option B was designed at the City's request to space the two accesses further apart. The application will contain a variance which will demonstrate how the distance between the accesses in Option A is acceptable. Q—Will there be a new traffic light installed on Walnut Street? A — (Storm) Yes, an emergency vehicle actuated signal will be installed across from the fire station to allow the fire trucks to enter traffic. Q —Will the traffic light be tied to any other intersections? A — (Storm) No, the traffic light installed can only be activated by the drivers of the fire trucks and will only be used to allow the trucks to enter traffic. Q— It is not a regular stop light? A— (Storm) Correct. It will only be used by the fire trucks. Comment: Neighborhood resident stated that he believes the property was ill gotten and he is not in favor of the community room. He believes that any community meetings could be held at nearby schools (CFT Elementary or the middle school). He went on to say that he believes the community room is an additional tax payer's expense and that the expansion of Jack Park will increase the traffic on Walnut Street. Additionally, he says, there are already too many parks for people to use and this all bothers him considerably. Comment: A different neighborhood resident stated that he welcomes both the fire station and the community room and he has two questions: Question 1: Q— How did they come to the architectural design? Comment: The neighborhood resident has seen two examples of fire stations that look like large houses and conform dramatically to their surrounding residential neighborhood. Friday,July 27, 2007 Page 2 of 5 Tualatin Valley Fire&Rescue: Waln4.Street Fire Station Neighborhood Meeting Minutes A — (Bob) TVF&R is trying to develop a set of design standards that each station would be held to. Internal circulation is very important. Aesthetically, it is important to have a high quality building but with low maintenance and an open design. When designing the building they try to determine if it should blend in or stick out. They have tried to make this building blend in with a combination of rural and residential design. Q — Is the design still open for discussion? A — (Frank) Yes, in fact, that is a good topic for this meeting. Although, there are some design parameters from TVFS�R that must be followed. Comments from Neighborhood Residents: - Should be more residential looking; - It looks like an industrial or big, box building; - The neighborhood had higher expectations and has a higher standard of design. Q —Why is the building grey? A— It is actually green; it just looks grey in this light. The cedar shingles will be painted a sage green. Q — Why are you using cedar shingles? They are the most flammable type of building material and a brush fire could break out in the park and set the fire station on fire. You should use brick. A — (Bob) Brick will be used along the bottom of the building and the cedar shingles are treated with a fire retardant. Q —Will any stone be used in the design of the building? A— (Bob) No. Question 2: Q —There will be plenty of parking spaces, is it possible to put them behind the building? A — (Bob) The placement of the parking was chosen to give as much property to the park as possible. Because of the apparatus route it would be difficult for the parking to go behind the building — it would be a tight fit and not visible to people. Q —The question about the parking is aesthetic—could you design something to hide the parking? A — (Frank) The landscaping is not shown on these site plans but the City does require a landscaping buffer around the parking lot. Comment: The neighborhood resident explains that the street is lower than the property at the location of the parking and suggests a higher than normal buffer. Comment: A different neighborhood resident states that there should be no buffering around the parking lot — that it should be completely open to the street and park — and closer to the community room for safety reasons when people leave meetings at night. Q —Will the fire truck sirens frequently go on and off? A — (Storm) Under state law the fire trucks only use their sirens when it is necessary to move traffic out of the way. With the signal on SW Walnut Street, sirens will not be necessary as fire trucks exit the station. After 10pm they try to use their sirens as little as possible and make every effort to just use their lights. TVF&R try to be excellent neighbors and try to accommodate the surrounding neighbors as much as possible. For example, they don't use their back-up sensors when backing into a station in a residential neighborhood. Q —What kind of fire engines will be at the station? A — (Storm) A structural fire fighter. The station could potentially accommodate any apparatus, if necessary. Friday,July 27, 2007 Page 3 of 5 Tualatin Valley Fire&Rescue:Wa._ ,c Street Fire Station Neighborhood Meeting Minutes Q—Will there be any emergency vehicles (ambulances) at the station? A — (Storm) No, ambulance services are provided by Metro West. TVF&R owns a few ambulances which are only used for back-up or in an extreme emergency. Q —Will the vehicles be parked inside? A— (Storm) Yes, the trucks can not be allowed to get to cold or freeze because of the water inside. The parking to the west of the building will be strictly for the park and community room. Storm then introduced Daniel Plaza from the City of Tigard to talk about the future expansion of Jack Park. Dan explains that this project has been endorsed by the City Council who felt it was important to extend the park south of the Creek. The community room is great for partnering and for having meetings and they asked TVF&R to make the room bigger. It will be possible for the room to be divided in half and while there are meeting spaces in central Tigard it is important to have additional meeting spaces out in the neighborhoods. Dan explains that the City Council was really the driving force behind this project. Jack Park has been in the neighborhood for a long time and is essentially a neighborhood park that serves the people who live around it and that will probably not change with an expansion. Dan that shows the two draft site plans for the park and describes them as follows: • Option A: o Builds off the architecYs Option A; o Play structure and parent's seating area to the west of the parking area. The playground is for very young children (a tot lot) and the parking will be close to the community room. Between the play structure and the community room will be turf. o There will be a Creek crossing that will hook up to the existing trail system and connect to the existing portion of Jack Park. • Option B: o Basically the same but with the parking area moved and the tot lot shifted. o Will still have the Creek crossing. Dan then started taking questions from the neighborhood residents. Q —Who preferred Option B? A— (Frank) The City development code requires the driveways to be further apart. Q — Has a demographic study been done of the neighborhood to find out the age of the children living near the park? There are not a lot of very young children in the neighborhood who would use that type of play structure. Will it be utilized? A — (Dan) There is currently a play structure for elementary school aged children in the existing portion of Jack Park. We wanted to have a feature in the expanded portion of the park near Walnut Street that would be recognizable to people driving by. Comment: The neighborhood resident is not against a tot lot but would like some justification for that choice. Dan replied that it is important to remember that the demographics of a neighborhood change but he is open to finding out the information. Other suggestions for a feature along Walnut Street included a gazebo but not a skate park. Comment: The neighborhood resident doesn't think that Jack Park needs to be expanded and they are against the placement of the fire station. The park is not well utilized. The resident than reiterates the other residenYs request for a demographic or utilization study. Friday,July 27, 2007 Page 4 of 5 Tualatin Valley Fire&Rescue:Walnu.street Fire Station Neighborhood Meeting Minutes Comment: A different neighborhood resident states that expanding the park is a total waste of tax payer's money and that there is already a sign at 124`h Street advertising the park and there is no need for a recognizable feature along Walnut Street. Dan explains that the City of Tigard has a goal to have an active park within a half of a mile of every residential home in the city if there are children living nearby. Comment: This neighborhood resident believes that the creation of the park is very beneficial to the neighborhood and welcomes the park. Comment: A neighborhood resident states that the traffic is already too fast on Walnut Street and there is no way for her to cross the street to get to the park safely. Dan suggests the resident contact the appropriate City agency if there are problems with traffic on Walnut Street. Comment: How will people cross Walnut Street to get to the park? The Creek crossing should be at the southwest end of the Creek and connect to the trail system which should extend to the sidewalk on the west end and a pedestrian crossing with a light where the trail comes out should be installed across Walnut. This would tie in with the Master Plan for trails. Comment: Neighborhood resident is in favor of the park and enjoys taking their kids there but it is difficult to cross the street and parking is extremely limited. Thinks the park would be better utilized if there were better parking. The resident loves the idea of a gazebo that could be used in conjecture with the community room. Thinks it would be nice to have live music and concerts. Comment: Neighborhood resident doesn't want any more noise coming out of the park. Hans makes the comment that it is his experience over time that TVF&R makes excellent neighbors — they provide open space, are clean and provide 24-hour security. The meeting was then brought to a close. Neighborhood residents were encouraged to stay involved in the process and were told that future notices concerning the project would be sent to them. Project Team Members in attendance: Storm Smith, Tualatin Valley Fire & Rescue Daniel Plaza, Parks Department, City of Tigard Hans Ettlin, Peck Smiley Ettlin Architects Bob Thrapp, Peck Smiley Ettlin Architects Frank Angelo, Angelo Planning Group Katie Prew, Angelo Planning Group Friday, July 27, 2007 Page 5 of 5 � �� a � � Exhibit E: Plan Set Tualatin Valley Fire & Rescue Walnut Street Fire Station /% -- -- , � i i.,, _ v � �1 /i I - -------------__ `�ae•s�':ie°� / ' VC-1 s. � L� j ' �• • ',: �j �� /a ia2�. ,,. 'c Cl � I ' �o�,y0� - " .'. _ _ _ _ - � O / ! � . � :'� � �� / � � �ti� � � 1� �'�o�• ��/ ,'' . �\ , i '�i � i �/ ' � �� ` \ /,. . . � ,. � i � �.: �� 1�► ' �, • y Q,` �� i . � �?� /� .•11?, ..�2`6 ,1\8.//220.�/�. �� . P E C K �. L . - . �� .:�� ...� . � �� SMILEY � ' 2 . ` ` _ _ � E T T L 1 N � '�J I ry,�p'� ` . .�� o r c h I t e c t s _.._ _ __._._._-�------� � � � '�' � . . . ._...----_.-- - _-.-=-.. - -. � � . .._--.-.._ ' ' ' --__ ._ � : ' . �- ry'Lb __.---- ---- / _..._.._ �.._ . .... wuswtOUErr�ve. _ _. _ ._.._ . - ..,- ��..-.._ i �,. . . . .'� � , __._ ►ORilA11 �. _. . : .�'. .: . ��- VEGETATE -- --_ __ _ r.�c w»x�amaa D.OR[GON 97701 � MWMG(707)LF9170 / ' _- - �\2096�: /... COORIDpR 22e } , r - �� , DRY l BOUN 0� - --_--_.__— F ti ___. �� ;�o�" �. �� , ,y :;, `,,� . . � ' . ;• _ zza ^� . '. .. �c�o�n ,.,, - _ ,.• .•'.. ' .. �,�.�s, t� �.. . L �� / r __- -t �.�� 4 �e�' � `'/-�� / -ni q28 ... . _ �L �/� 4. i t ��- ____ �_� . :..\ � .-� .�' .� .�� ..... aur�-+ . .- � S,�- , / .... �t \ . j �_.. . :.:..-.. I ,- ��', � : � � . . � ._... � , - � . � �/ i 228 41 ` 9 � ;� � .,� �249fr �'�� Rj � �-., f� 4 p'C i ' � �, 'L ryry'L_�.� .\�. .��; �r^iria y , �•�26% r/ � r i�, % ,p1 ' �-7 � (7 ...... ."- �✓• >�.� � .'L1'� �' ,�16• \ � !��.� �iiiir .._... .� � ��-�� ' �; � [�� i ,}---�- �, a ;;��„ ,� �. �,/ 230 ?3p_ SITE PLAN ,�„ � ;s� � , , , < � ' ; f ' r�i� x �� - x� .zxm „ --1 � � . 'i��j�,, � �. .. �„ --.-. a- --- _ y 3e n � - _ � �,� � �' � � i �•I . . ^, / , , �-�� , ^ ' . � ' , ... .. .. _' ' i .'� .. . . �/,`/• __ �.�n�I ru�uE r � � 0 � � � t� p.. ......__ F i R) I PERMAhENT DRAIV�,:;E � . �� y� �'�� *� � / ; ANC CONSERVATIC:� .-.. . �� . .�� .� ...-�.. ;,� �� ... r .. -, , I.meio a_I � �_ _�-_ :?; � a � �• _ EASEMENT //!!i �,� . .�� • . . ._. �D� _ �� y _�__. ; � , �./. 'h - _ _ i ` - - - _ � c� , ,. ! .�' `ti -- +--_r '— - � d r.?a C� i .� � ' ' !: .::� r� _l - - � . . . - -': p '�'�, P,c� , ....\ I �' �:� � - � J '�Kj�;i i i i i�;� �-- r-.+.:-c�� _.---'� -.-� � L � �__� �4:. .: .. �� . .... - . . i/i' i i J DS -��.. �= . i '` � -. � .. ,� ;��XiST�NC .�j . `� �'� -_ _"-.�_ i .�u«�m � .�...- ,. ... �-`��... : _ � • .� '� _ ._'. . . _, _. � , -�_. _� � .-��,,� ..;:: �: ...... �BUi_D�NG.�n - �`i4 � aa J - - - --� --- - �� -• , Y iiii ' � � � .. . i; ii _� y- - - - - _ -..� _+_—.- --+_"-�e`°"" � � '.'' � ��.� . .� % ... i�/J1�U�.� � ._ .._ __.. _.._ _"— � , -: .. ',. ,.�. .� i � — _ . � _.._ _ . � • . .. . � �,- - ,__ --_ . _ _ - - ._ _ .. /. � � . - _' - _'_- _ _. _. T/4FF ,. . � ; _ _ — � . / .�'" .\�1�X° . " � � — -- - �� - � PARKING T � _ ,. L -«2 � �rr -i. , � �,/ ; ��. �/.� �...�.. � ,._...% -p - .w�� - ' - _ . ^c �� a . i �: -. : -' �.,�.,m_ � � _- _— �- _ - �-: . , � ` _ -_.. � ...' _ _ _ �, ,r: ,: : . /�� :: : \ . .. .:.' �L: ._i, _ ��e-er,�. .`_� � ''- , / ' '�, '" := � --��.-"�'�`y y-r- -��=#Fp� �- 1 0 / i � _ .�. 9... � -- -- n, ,; i �.. _ 0 . . �. � . __ -��T7�N _ I �� •• ,f %,�. �.35�� titi � .VEGETA p " _� ' ��,- - r'Tvaa2s�„! - _� � -g - ^�F��' �� 'i _ ' � � RIDOR _ -- _ _ - - � _.i� 23� Cpp � �t-; �o #- , . , 6 � � t _ _ �- • � , \. ,.. B _— �e �. _ , � �" - _ . _. . � � , � , ' _� _ . �- O -+ _ _ -+- _, � �m � � UNDRY i� �� + -- -.,- - _ � �. --- k � `� , 1 �,2�°� _ -----"� - - - __ � .�' P�RMlJCE4j/) A�E � .__.__ ._. . ._.._..-._.__. � �� .;- , � " -__' � ' � � �' -"---- � -- -" ---_.-_-_ - � �/�_ i� ��'�'r�,! AtiD.•CO � �T' IGN -.-- . � �--�-' _ -- � _ _ xa.r.� W . -- � - � ' �` � '� ,...��. , . . . . _ . ; :�. ,� � SE . . . , �.. ......._ I �- � . _-� -- -_ �d : .. . . .. . . . �, .:-... _ �L r+ �. �, I � � ,.. � _ � 3, - �-t-- , � :�F :. :^i � ., � �- �- — _�-- ...._...-- - � - -'- , . . , . .�� _ � .. .:.- �. � �' � : � � .�' .' .'� a�;iwrwn- �-1 .!�/ - - - -- - _ 7 .,..� � - , �. � .. - . :} . . � _�' .� ,� . e a.sK�a 6 Y �- — � r. �.�:..._.w+w� .. 142 231 _ ,..,.."' � - � � , `I � 2��3.25 ACRES ��_ z3 � - _ �- = _ J� � --- , . S.F I . - .� .. . '_ - -f +'�.� ; f , / - ) _ � _ - _ '�° — � ; I; . , --�- f � --r -b B rF \. a.�,�.� .�. ` CONCRETE -. 1 1 1��y�a: :� �� . : , .� / - I . . F = _ ��_ - .nweu�o J�... ,.26... .38' �� ;om: LR1tK�.RE7 / :� . . : :•��.� `� V� � - u' �.. ♦ ,�a9� _-_____ � RETAINING WALL � � � ��- �� . ��. �-- _. ! . :, _ . � �. � � .. � f�AININ. � AL4 � a.l P��'a `�r �.. � ��.J �w'�ne Y� -IS-tS-�}-, �• _ .' e + �.% ,�,... � � � �PI .�� ... _ _ � `" � . ..-__�:1 . � ". _ '-� � �`�eenr�" - _ � .. � . .. - - - ,� -- � �' P y I ��I I {-- l �� r�.": � "� _ _ r , � ""�" } ' _ � ��i� � . . ! 9 � -_ bX _ ._ � � i- /� � o%".'�-' .:�.rcm, 4� , . :'� ..� .' .� .- . - . _ � i 3{ ExISTIN'�SLJPE� . r 'J�-2�6�� fI� � -- / ----------- � ' ' : :'�� _ '-.a V� AND J L1F+�" ' I .�,UR6� .t F ,� _' `_ _ _ �' 6RETAiN NG Ea��ENT�� i � i � L.--r-rSTAh�c3i�+��°�::k , r „��f�� / - � � - ��:.__ ?3 WAl AN[ �, f_.-� 1-cS , _*. I, ��p. � - �� . �. � � . ,.�� .... "`.- - -- _- - - - - � . � , �� WM... .- . .-�-��"� . � � - - �b L .;y' . . �y rt"322.65� T- ' '� . � ♦ . .sh, - _.. :ws�on � ; .. . �'�� ../'�� ..~ �.T�_, ..... . .� ... ....... .... .. �� "Rf Z�`�� / � �-..�..... . � � �� f, a � T�J ,N� � ..."� ��' � \CLEARANCE / � `� " ��:::'39't t"•�N � 5.,�:'� . �i.1-�`�....__.. - .... . ._ .... . �TrF � __..._ �=23'33�06�� f� ?. -- - . �'- �'s� • -'� . - � �� ;�-' _� � / ��..�. � . . ��-- , :-;� . � , - � � ��.. .- � . . � � ' :.. ' � � , V - . . �EN 3'L � .- � ' . < ' P _ SB - �� . . �...141.68' � . T.4.r'l� ♦ � . , : � _ / _ _ � � �.�F� � .�" . „, ''. . . . ": a - _ �f--.--- � � _ ' / � . � +3Cff� S$' ,., +�.-._ _ . . , � . .� : _ _ r--.�-;�-'� '� �-^- ---�. , CURB • ;. f .. _ - ., � �. . _� �.. ux , v.� � _ - -:,: --- . �. . � . __ , _ .� w — �=--� � � � ��:`-'� �``�"°% 1.N 5% , , _.—_._ . _ _--- .�;. �..�>> � _ " �o= , _ _ wp ,� A1 .1 � _ � �- �7 _ . __. � _ ; - —� o , � _ � . � . , , J � C ,:�. ' _ : «� R�?,.4$'_ -r ' S V�I• �� ,- �„ � , _�- __ � � . � ; �� i ; :' t ._ _ ---# - � , ,- ., ,.... . ,. r �- ; CURB �-��. __-�- � : � f 1 x,,.,_ � {{�,,.� � . _ . .___. .. . , � : � � '' ,..,_- �j.� ; �' � - w_. ... .. � Na�•n�•��•�,,. . �230 :' ,' . vieqn-.. , �---'.: �H s� r --------------------------._1... r- �--------------------i I I � r � � � � � � , � § � � ..�a� � � ; I i •�'.'OL"Ed`WT I I � � i i �i �� —B' -j f__n. � � i � \ i i _ _ �J 7N 671D LLLLL < 1 =__�_ '_____' ______'""'__"""__ __�_'_�61z10LCa<LV.SidrpAl�flFF i __ _ ____'_'____________s1____"""'"___" ' ---J_ '_ '�L-. - � POSi:lSPJ 7'-L'N CdNG- ' FIL1 YV CClC.1%OPE TOP "CG 5?�i Bdi \ �� § P E C K \ - SMI LEY \\ E T T L I N - cHn�u-lNC WiE �y __' ��cF�f ,.,.'�D. nrchit�ctt rat DteJr rN• 57E0.PPi'E E0. OP4!PCdTIp! R 4dtE HMGO!CR�YD-&!� � ,�_ S+fEL&L�G E!¢aGK M12 SW COR�ETf AVE. . . fORRAND,OREGON 7T101 ' _ . . . . �1qNE(30.3)]Y�0170 "_.___..--" FAX:(30.t)7AL0]27 � TR�SH ENCL08URE-PLAN e_� B� ICYC�E RACK � w+w ►� M1ra � _ v��.�e• -----� �ao.ron ur- a �•` �� »r.n r+��r+:suv -- Pd/�RR1�N'RRYYp. , j/. i.;;;i;/i� -(7�.DId�I'�.L��4'-CgOG ` YE4TViPY�4LL DIi.WLLS � FEO'D t0 H/Nf I'GAP�W4LL � V� ��-6'uKSi d:tf+. PT.3.IOdMPER� - �.� ' . LE!�ER9�Ea.SiDE , i ALL MT.IWYLS .; /��i�� ;i --]X6 4i1D!�Yr'OL. • �'CpC.uV 9.- . "__"_ ��i ' � � - cRL.'�ONG CN Et1LDNG PN{R m b .�:�. v�oc.ea wa� � a ia�P�*uo.�r+EnrN. '� t"-, `�1 � _.__r�tro Re}e '1"` ��+1; 65PMALT MVIYa- / !'h04 Ga- ,�j�,� �'F I�.-. _ -� _ -__ nn`,o«. �y Ei --- - --- �� y �.; � ^ r�- �? .�_ � �. ��,SH ENCLOSURE-SECTION � � E' � v�•w k::>� � �; • PYLON SIGN `� � N:;� , �_� .,, ��, /� ----��+r� � e�FO` �>rt :s> G5 / W PL4571C SlATS t- C-� ! _ � UELD�M�'#TO ii�J �Ylj, �-' tA ro6t h, f� � v �a _ -TS 6rb 'y� _ � __- 4 � I �� _ _ \ - � � r-� d o� �:<;�;1;�� ut� � �I �:-7.'. . � �•• I � .. .. ...� .Y � �:. _ � ,b .. , i ,: �_ : .V.�y .� f I � / . . l=.-_.. .__ ' L � _ _ - - _ - _ _."'__ ._. !rT'1 G�i�V�1 DhII',P PP:y 9�FF�f NTC �7.� LQC.-t71�9. ! T iniL:,R-ve_o�v� s TRASH ENCLOSURE-ELEVATION �"-""'""RY- , w•+'4 . 'S 6.6 � S�1YD iRM __. :bE: � F2:.5WK.6'E�P'a6Ep ww _.R.�'! awso � ..-....__—:;A1�i40� !E � =i�� _. � � _-_ __. __. _... ___; � =:ST!u,�5'.5!^1'�.�aer 4 TRASH ENCLOSURE-ELEVATION A1 .Z � � �� ! � � � ----� � ; ;' r % i ij / I n � ` � ii ----- ----- --- °� _ / i -' _�__ i � =i ��s= aa=cc� cas= �� PECK �� !I ---.� -------- 5 M 1 L E Y =�1 = --- -- E T T L 1 N �' � �� --�_� - -- (�FAMUNtTY � _�� a r t h I��c t s R006A i � c c�' �. � sr.... � Q ' �� MIiSWOOIIKTf�vE 1 °_ - ° !'0[TIAND.OIIEOONfT101 -'___------- MIOWE:p01)34-f170 I �� fuc:pml]MAw I ^� .� I� __ ' I �� k� DININO DAY � �..��,.- � `� 'I ROOIA ROOIi� .�, � I I I i I � v��iwr r,°ir �� ...}.._. I I I I I I t I I I ! I � �� 'i ____......__. I I I I ---- - ��. j \ / I I I 1 I I COMM KRCHEN ------ . � — �� i.AUNDRY � ' � � � � � ". - — :* .• ��'...-1 ------- ` ------ ------- v.r.w :%��- � �• �� - �� f -�/ �\ � DORM APPARAItIS I BAY ELECT r� — i — - �±� ,.. -.. I r . ��u° __ i' '� � � �''�, � i 3 li . � , ' �. H; �� , / � _ � � �� EJ(ERGSE I I �'� ..... � _ �ry E) �va�� f� � RooM : � �+ � II� A � � � �,' � _ �� MBd � SIANR � J. �y °� �� ' -- .—s ^ � - • Q ' r..'�'�,. ppR1iA �� -r � � _ w•'i �� @ [� � " � m � � ?� t ., . �� _ -- — , �- _- �'� - £i n�� i ; '!s !, f;•.;i CLEMIUP/STOg � . r' � � ..� Q Q 9f'N:M / �� ' r�`1 . ',.i ,J - a�s , .."'i. ' , I ... N WOMEN _ -- _ I-K H ��j�—� � �� / a Q�I�N � � ._.�'�'L�R � � ROOM LJ I M I � � = I � `� i I I p� FIRST FLOOR PLAN /\ ' ';; ; �' "'E`�' ` — � n,� , �— —, �—�-----, �..�. ' , i i � i ; i `" " . \T - i � , ur•rr ��,,,., , our000R i � i � i � ` ��\ �� ' � � � � � � oFF� ' i �- \\� PRELIMINARY _.__ -__. , I i I I I — � ` _ � 3TORAOE �-3 '� I 1 I I I �^ •,r LOBBY � �� _- _ a� n� :r�' �� sr..: I I I I I I — ..._....--- I' - �. � I 1 I I I er°.��aa �-) - �� I ' W�'_lh 4'NJCS � ___ i�'\� ,�r i -- ( sa�� _ -=c-° ==,�m s= Ic i :bm: � .,� --b.y � e esF � i � -- zr � s aa..¢c� I � I _ �';� ' --=-"----- I ---- -------— - —_- _� A2.1 � � � �,,.�.._.�.�.,.��.,�.�_ � i ; i I E I � � � , � � � '- � ----- __ . __ I ; ., : -. 1 ; "�. ; � � � E � i � � ; ' I , � , � ' ..�r-T�—�� ..r ._. ..____ .. � � .-- _ �, __ _ - � - -___ ti;4 � � �� — � I �4 ,, � _ _ ' '.,�f^ ` WEST ELEVATION _ P E�K I/B' . I'-0' SMI LEY E T T L I N archlt�cf� u�:sw mRrrt�vE. �P_— _ roRn,wo.ouaon rno� -'_. ; u � ,� -- �� na�: uarno ___ FA1C(7C117Y-OU7 .� - ___ ____- -�._ a j' �-. , " _.—� - ,.��.. �:� ... '_—" __""___— _ ; ., .-� __ �,� i. ; '\ ' '___ _ — '��, � I�. .� i; �.`' �" =%� ' _ ,.� ��'. _�� .� "..� � /.. .'-", '—_ .. _� ..�— �. � �' '_�' -r r_ -r_ _ __- — ... �:,. �%-•. "' _'_ .-� , .. _._. i . -'- . _ _ �' ' ii '-- q � ' . � '_ _._.__ _ _ _ - __-__.. . _.__ __' L� .._... ___—_ —_ ___- ... .. ._. �� . - , . .. _.._ ___.._.. ...,�� r+ ( ..� . . , '-'� ' �.�.. . .. . ��. f.fifRA'Oa . I - .- t�ra�R ::ri, �k .: y�, v:j . ., � . -- s��:: ; . , . . g. � , �., _- ��.. . -... �.: �t ,�, �� —_` � , , , , : . ; , . ._ �, . _ � a � , �' NORTH ELEVATION �� -�; ��8• . ,._a. � �� ' �� ; � E, � � �, __ ...... .,_-----�- r- --- � -�- - ��%z t; i i � j �, ��', E'= ? ' €1, �; � ; � � I �i;� � �`:1 c=� �� }'� i I ! �P, ��,, � ' Ui'4 ✓ I I I I i i � I I s � ��ti. � � i � I I � � ' i I � ' � � � � � � � � � � � � , , . '. � � � , � i : � � � � I I � � �� '-. T �: : - �,.- , , - :.,--,--. --- : � -- -� _ �--� r � __- -. � �. � � , - _ .�.' 4*`v��t�£M'VI.S�/y��y.4t��, � l 'C. EAST ELEVATIDN ��s• . ��-0' PRELIMINARY I _ __—_—_— —_____ - , . .........LUMR'Yc / ..q ..... �— `—_.'.ANJR,ttP. _ ___ '—""__'_ � �_ �- � _ ___�� LGM fiKrJR.T'T� � _ '� � �_ �, � - _-_ �`, !AKlFT.M.� �� ' . %�-,, �. ncyci :6� .. - _ '� n . -�- ..9 ,��. . .'� � -� � _ . .. � --'� � � .� � �_ \ �_ i" _ - `' ----- - - y � , - . - _- ,,_, ,- , _ _ . , , P... � - � - - - - - - � _- � , ,� - . , i - : -.. m ._� � � T, -, . _ ��,; _ : _� . '� � �- - , , _ �,. , ��_ - � , - - � -- :�- � -� - :�_ _ .._«�.�,�� _%' �_ - - � � d _ -- - --- _ - �� _. _ _.. . _ . . ; ��,�� ..,�.. - - --_ _ ' ' ' - , . 1 . _ - - _ ��,5,� , — _ � _ ,; - ; _ � � ��.�w�� :f - ; _ �- - � —��,�:w��».,� ' x � .,- �-'�,,-'` � ��,� — - ��.. � -- �,�,-.��n . _... � .- . 5. . _ -- � i ? �; , f,. .'�3'.L 4.'*',4,s*'.% �{'��i +'i.'+' ��fn �.+i_ — --�ra�e�sc� ly.. A3.1 � SOUTH ELEVATION � i,e• . i•_m• � � ..,,�,... ,.�m..,.� F t � �,..,�.�, � w.c„y,:�.,.,h,v ,.ww� � � � c„�.�o r .' 9 s.,,x,� t ; -- � � � �1 .�.�:v µ�y � � ' � � PBS r � . „�.� ; �w�� SE67G'06�E lSl.b' � ; � � � ENC'.WFERNGNAEM�pawgM/�t ; �PROJECT LOCATION � r ._ s.��^ 1310 MAIN STREET / t SwWad�r>: 'e 5wum�nsi VANCOUVER,WA98860 � g },, � y,.�r PHONE:360.890.4331 � FAX:380.698.9081 / � {� � �y tv 10bb 51 i �, � r s.ian,x �^"'w.Pbsenv.com / �+ � �� S xP � s.�.�^w s� ,`�(y�9 P�DFi� �EGETATED � y G i M P �'iQ,� �� CORR�DOR ,}.a � y c: s.nurWnst � C� e�7v61BaE'* �y E%�STING 24' � � BWNDaRV t� B �p _.� r CMP CULVER7 �,� / "� �.��,L.�, Lp � Ij' J�� . � ,.,_r��,r,v,r, _' ' .-�..,. ...,.- : �F t n�;,`eaono,�eru � �� /� SITE VICINITY MAP `'��AM�°`J 52,242 S.F. v�Ei�AND / " (7.20 ACRES) BOUNDARY �i�/ � SCALE:NONE EX%RES: 12/31Ipg fi�. /a�' TOf'O�BANK-- // � / / / / /Ri�� / �y'ti°q t5' ACCESS ROnD Y TO STORMWATER .�'o — — — — �`�- � FA��TY GENEt"aAL NOTES r �, 1. CONTRACTOR SHALL FIELO VERIFV TNE LOCATION, AUGNMENT, OEPTH � \� � AND WVEFTS OF ALI.EXIS7ING UTilJ11E5 PRIOR TO BECINNINC ��A ° CONSTRUCf10N AND ORDERING MATERIALS.NOnFV ONMER IIAIAE6iATELY NEnAND � °1 °1 ° �i•4, N OF E%ISP�;UTILIiY CONFUCTS W1TH NEW CONSTRUC7i0N. M�%ED SOUD ��Y �� WASTE STORAGE � � Z �,+' � UTILITY NUMBERS 0 i �� +, ' CITY OF 1 IGARD 503.639.4171 �"'� h � s GENER�TOR TIGARD PUBLIC WORKS 503.718.2596 � w �'� �c�psuRE CLEAN WATER SERVICES 503.681.3600 � / �\ NF6R 503.612.7000 ��p � . QWEST 800.244.1111 � � O ��.� � • NW NATURAL GAS 503.226.4211 � PGE 503.228.6322 � � �.� � � z o VEGE7AlED ,I INDEX TO DRAWINGS Z .�.� e�°p��°�� ,� I C0.0 CIVIL COVER AND SITE IMPROVEMENT PLAN i...� ¢ O y C0.1 EXISTING CONDITIONS � 3 G� �� sT� C1.0 UTILITY PLAN Q exisnNC �� P�K� � C1.1 STORMWATER PLAN � � (� DRAINACE AN� / T7�1REE-BAY FIRF: Cn ... cor+s'�RVnnoN �� STATION C1.2 GRADING AND EROSION CONTROL PLAN EASEAIENT � FF=Z36.00' CZ.O EROSION CONTROL DETAILS �,y '� � �� C2.1 STORMWATERDETAILS � �� C2.2 WATERDETAILS � N � g �� 37,889 S.F. w � � ��:`'E�� W � (OJ3 ACRES) � 8 � L �, /� � ,- C� $ � . - � �� NSt70R � m»s•ze•w sx' � I E%ISTING PARKING ' - i .,.,�...,.. �%ISTINC UTILIiY RETAININC ' . .� • -� � ' ¢ei / .. � EAS�JAENT� WALL e : � �-: � �� / ��. . '._________ '� l. � ' � / �_---_--�-_ t2 DRVEw . _.__ --_-___-- � _� `-_ • .�9 .-•�. '� .. � I� � ' I�, OF'OSEDY/'�, SOt7Y'tt"� SOn' --�- � ]0' SEiHACK '--- -- ' . ' � EXISTING � j.° -� -' � � I i s s�w�� '� � 62'PPOPOSED � t I ��IJ � � ORrvEW�r �Iy-� L EXISTINC 5' J � 41'PROPOSED � '(' PLANTER SiRIP E%ISnHC f22' E%ISPNG '-I pRIVEWAY 1 • � -�" � f �, E —"---' . '-_'__'__' OF PAVEMENT 55'ROW � ' � I � �' CALL --'—"-----'___,f_--.._'�'____'__�- LJ � I � g� 2BUSINESSDAYS S.W. WALNUT STREET L J BEFORE YOU DIG CML COVER " 1-800-553�344 AND SfTE 'Ifs Ne Law" IMPROVEMENT E%iSTiNG� FIRE HYDRANT O' 15' 30� 60' NW UTILITY NOTIFICNTION CENTER PLAN CONCRETE CURB w+o.rtc*: 70570.00D (�'�� sca,�e: ,•=30� UMMAR : TAX PARCEL#: 2S104ADp4500 �,�,,,: � — SITE AREA: 327 ACRES(142,232 SQ.FT.) �M F.c. E��v. ; ' COMP PLAN DESIGNATION: LOW DENSITY RESIDENTIA� 1� ' �.,,� - �� SITE IMPROVEMENT LEGEND ZONING DISTRICT: R�.S °"'�' ""�'°°' 4�j ,� �— QUARTER SECTION: SE 1f4 OF SEC 4,T2N Ri W W.M. �1ONS �. E%ISTING CONCRETE SIDEWALK '�_i , x,�?— T`�7�,_,`-_,�i=�i�,,;,TL,i.—��I I GENERAL INFORMATION: � NEW ASPHALT�PAVEMENT PROPERTY OWNER: ARCHITECT: APPUCANT: CIVIL ENGINEER: \ {�� `3'C1A55'B�AC. P�VEdENT � NEM�CONCRE7E SIDEWAUC TUALATIN VALLEY FIRE 8 RESCUE PSE ARCHITECTS ANGELO PIANNING GROUP PBS ENGINEERING AND ENVIRONMENTAL 2'CRU511ED SURFNpNG LEVELING COURSE ROCK(3/�'-D) �O■O r eRUS�+eo sw+r�NC ewse cou�+se aocu�i i/z--o� 350 COMMERCIAL PARKWAY BOB THRAPP FRANK ANGELO GUY NEAL ccorrxn�v,�nc NEW GRAVEL nccess ALOHA,OR 4412 SW CORBETT AVENUE 620 SW MAIN,SUITE 201 1310 MAIN STREET 957L COYPACTED SUBGRADE PH: 360.694.8577 PORTLAND,OR 97201 PORTLAND,OR 97205 VANCOUVER,WA. 98660 TYP{CAL ON�ITE PAVEMENT CROSStiSECTION FAX: 360.694.6157 PH: 503.248.9170 PH: 503.224.8225 PH: 360.690.4331 �E,� E-MAIL: tybrickner�cs.com FAX: 503.248.0223 FAX: 503.227.3679 FfJ(; 360.698.9064 SHEET 1 OF 8 E-MAIL: thrapp@psearchs.com E-MAIL: guy_neal(�pbsenv.com CML DRAWINGS TOPOGRAPHY SURVEY FOR WINDWOOD CONSTRUCTION IN THE NE t/4 OF SEC. 4, T. 2S. R. 1W, W.M. o �•g WASHINGTON COUNTY, OREGON � / SCALE: 1"-30' JANUARY 3, 2006 ° ro s/e�woN nao t ��.�E o �c e•(�w1-�o..�a• � �4 5 � 0 15 JO s5 60 ,� c/��e'(s-�e)-zo,.>f' 1 e V � sa•oet rs�..xi' R V �p 1 f� V"� FD S�L1ftON 0.00 � _� e'DEC 6'p[q0 � O te � M1 � O ~ 6'pECID 1 � L�� • 2s'tuv .]10. yyp tp � ze y04 1a �t11 � � . i ' v �' sb[cio ' cua ,�� 6'OEC z0l.i1' e'ocno � � CASIIELL/ 6bEC�D bECI HERTEL 6'DECID SURVEYORS INC- y16 g 6150 S.W. 124th AVE. � �pT BEAVERTON, OREGON 97608 (503) 644-3179 vo s/e�aon noo b� ue �o'`", � n r� � � /1p � PRO ESSSpNAL n LAND SURVEYOR n y1s a 9 '^ OREGW�i IPt ti M1� ��1 Lp4 4 �igg6� �� 1y6 ExPIRES 6/30/2009 rocno .w��zw n X z�°�L ocweweK*owa�r.� �. M+D CONSEM�na1 }.265 ACRES Fns[uEM` / ry+p (142.232 S0. FT.) ;� 1�I W �E�GEND G wL��p+CRE1T 1 / � Q LEHtER IHIE � 'P fMV CORRIKATEO ME?/�L RPE CONL CONCMTE � lc ! CO CLFN!IXff W 7J2` � D� �iELEV510M PE➢ESTK � S DEU� OEPOUOU$1REE EB EIECTIM.�L BOx O yo 1p 6bEd0 ,� 1 O 0�1 EIECTPoC/�L YEIiN ti fD �OUMD � � 1� y)1 1 f'DEpD .��O�W_��. � � 11P HFAi PlM V . . [ �NNERT E1EVAl10N v S�MfMY W/Y10.E N - lD . ..UGMl POIE �p RY-](11.61' � . �'.• ,F� PG.. . PONFIi FOIE � IE E'(N'�•210.16' e i1bECD 7.4 RPC RED RASfK ClP M11h�I11.41' h ��2I EtlD . ¢e'(�-xo.is• 1y` n1ues � c�rtn¢so�� srwxs � � . O�� ruvHOnc caana aoz t � � �e i � y��"" w w�`,.me�v[PCOCSr.i y0� �� M1` .z� Ha �7 �wws c�cciacx�a+�[A WR¢_I W ]J6.94' TW E } IXISiH�C SLOGE ACL_y� RIM 13�.56 W U�M1tf/vAULT Si0i1Y LLw10lE 1 1p �,.' 1I..5.•• M1D IE t3"(SE)'27�.70•� -SS- SwRNtY SEIYER �� -S- S10RN SEKR Rw-376W' • 4 ,3 . • � -E_ �E'CKTRMIl.la1E K 1Y'(M)=731.�0' � JJ.t!'• ItEYTf014 E%SMIC:IOPE 5 STNftS \ SL SFK - � LP o �LLwH01.E 'UE- UNOERCFd1ND ElEC1iMG 11NE E 17"(�r1a.�s' _ /z,yxErNNNC wuL ,�q�ry�n a aP°RC � , / mu.2a�.ss� -vvz- uNUwcao�rw vEmza+urrc �T FASEYENT A�771J�00� 'O. I[t]'(NW)�271.77� UCBN- UNpERC.ROUNp G$E UNE 7� — — ti _ / C tEN.3]039' !�� [13'(S)�217.81' � ��n� 50�'79'II�IY . _ _ _BkG.58t'17'151Y E tI' � _ �¢ �S��Z71.aT SBT00•1 � t�W15 7 � � SVNlIJtY 1MMIOlE �Y § RIM-23].St' . c py / C/l IE�1Z9.35' CURB INI.CT I�CCE]��5([LD4s 2j4]9I'/� .�p. l/ �� NOTES x!+ y . OHE f00i CONTdIa InTEMNS I�E i7(5�I7a'7� �"1ii.ae' rt, �o nw.=n. • nl � v�M[un �P.bn�• / i ��n __�—.—+ o�--�tl"i11D'G np W�NMOIE �' V=��— — 719J-BO I y. RIY-177.t1' SLOfa�YWMOI�• tS 591.15' IE�249.]6' 7. KRIM'X MiUY: NGVD 19.flISED iROU W/SH�NGiON �17(Ej�22{)95' wZ3J.91' v ' y � � �E COUMfr BEMCM YMK�1)0. C L�E�31].)4• 11� TR ET � �-- _C C L C�170.]9' LOCAiED Ai THE wiERSECnON 0� c�� e'(w)-x]o.sa' sw iz�rt uw Sx nvwn nucE. c �— —��cuae�« � rx�c sronu wwl+oic RIM�235.79' IE B"CW)-230.99' REVWONS: 5�211f�0[9/OR�q{p��il,[RE�(pf�TqUGiqM.R[E1pJED iHE HOUSE.5?NRS MIO Q�RGJItf. �M'�+�': GIEp(m BY: JOB NUY9ER J1p0 — GENERAL NOTES P B S cncwcEawc�.ro cnvwaa+crrt.� t. LOCATpN OF EXISTMIG U71lITIES IS APPROXIMATE BhSED OFf OF VARKK15 E%ISTING ASBNLT INFORMATION.SURVEY PROVIOED 8�THE$URVEVOR. 13�0 MAIN STREET AND UTILfTY INFORMAiION.THE CONTftAC�OR SMALL FIEID VERIFY TT1E VANCOUVER,WA 98880 �� S].7p' LOCATION,DEPTH AND INVERTS OF ALL EXISTING UTILITIES PPoOR TO PMONE:360.890.4337 BEGINNNG COkSTRlIC710N AHO ORDERWG MATE0.1p15.NOTIFV OWNER FAX; 760.696.9069 / IMMEDNTELY OF E%ISTING UTILIfV CONFlICTS WITH NEW CONSTRUCTION. www.pbsenv.com / ' / 2. ALL MATE WIILS AND METFIODS OF CONSTRUCTION AND INSTAlUT10N FOR � SEWER AND S70RMWATER FAqLIiIES SFYI��CONFORM TO qTV OF TIC#iD (iE�P�Ff �� ANO CLFAN WA7ER SERVICES STANDARDS.CONSTRUCTpN SWLLL BE AS y1� o i a F �i(�, � PER TME S7ANDMD DETAILS CANTAINED HEREIN. � W+ry6��1 7; ,' SANITARY SEWER INSTALLATION NOTES ��-�r ��r �� 1, SEE PUN FOR 7HE%PE TVPE,SIZE ANO LENGTTI. ��`C4��B �p�1 J /� /� e CONNECi i0 EXISTING SANlTARY MANHOLE. �<<A MGG� G�p \I�/ � RIA1 � 2.57.63' E%RRES: 12/31108 J �E IN(W)�2J0,59' �_� +,P�' / IE WT(F)=230.29' IE k!lN)`230.59' 52,242 S.F. �' (1.20 ACRES) ,� ,� WATER INSTALLATION NOTES ,jM1'� /� 1. $EE C2.2 FOR WATEH DETAp$. / /// / �'- e T11P 1�O E%ISTING 24'WATER LINE USING A 26'Rd'TAP%NG SLEEVE. � (1)�'FLG X MJ V/LLVE VMITH VKVE BOx (1)THRUST BLOCK ep = (88)FEET�'D.L%PE 'ti. INSTALI: o� � e � (1�FDC(FROIA VERTICAL RISER M19uILqNG� �+F tM a (1)3'%9'%4'CANCRETE PAO p 1 � (1)�'90'BENJ (7�THRUST 8�.OCN � � 3 (78)FEET 4'G.l PIPE , � � � INSTALL: O Y� (t)1'r/'1d'TEE 0 (1)T RG%MJ Ca�TE VALVE WRN VnLVE BOX ~~ �!� � (7)21712'RtDUCER � W �a� (111 1R'DCVAR METER � �� -0 lt)THRUST BLOCK �+ .'Z (73)FEET 1 1IT'D.I.PIPE �>/� � O / �� V J �.��'� '� � TM MTO EX5i1NC 26'WATER lME USIN(:A 24'y1'TAP7ING SLEE VE. r �--1 w �. � �sr�: r-� � (�p \ (t)!'FLG X MJ VALVE N7TM VALVE BOX �p�.J i �z�r��sra�� z o (,,,•,5•OEWJ � 1� (1)ST�NDM�FlRE HVORANT�SSEMOLY 1`–� � �2J�)FEET 1'Ol RPE ,,� � INSTALL: � � � (1)THRUSTBLOCK � � 1 (1)1 7!2'FLG%MJ VALVE WfTH VKVE 80X � / � SEE UWDSCAPE PU1N FOR CONTINUATpN �/] � �/ E^ �/ PARKI � �NDq�EXISTMlG WATER M�7ERS ANO CAP UNE. �..L� � � TNREE-BAY FlRE p� N i � � $TATION INSTILLI WATER LNE TO ALLOW 1 FOOT OF SEPARATION BELOW WS UNE. �v � �� F��236.00' ] t /� h�l � INSTALL G0.5 SFE PLUMBH('a � �+ � i�� NE1FR FCxt OOMESTIC E„q .)1�$89 $.F. VER7ICALCNEp( IXNf1Y�R1ATION � ��/ (0.73 ACRES) vkvE�ssES�e�v � r+s�oE euaorac R �� s�rwwex�ci Fo s��w�rlwr � f � coNrn�wraH . � NSITOR sotis'ISY S.Je' �/� i PARKING .. ..-.. .... / . � /�p� IE�tJ,I �� ' � � �J--') � � �/ • � � 1VWATER � I y EASEMENT�O /� 501'SY'u"w 5.00' � , �> � I � • � cirv oF rM,�vtu /� � � �'� i1i�(�?-��-� UTILITY LEGEND � I � � � r�.n�a �[I � s��o.olt� � , ' EASEMENTRO � � I �-LJ • THRUST B�OCK —'_—' —_'__ COORONATE WfTM � � � CR�'Oi TIGAR� _i� � 9 WATER V�LVE �"�_�'�' �CCMONN�Ct10N �77 SANRARV I 1 UTIIRY '__'`-___ �__ L J SEWER EASEMENT -{ B W�TER METER --------------"---- ToCJTroF7KURD � � FlRE HYDRANT PUN S.W. WALNUT STREET /\ � FIRE DEPARTMENT CONNECTION S " —.—w��rt uHe , Ea75TING ----' -�-SANITARY SENER LINE vr+wcc*: �0570.000 FME MYIMANT -------ryA1ER UNE EASEMENT puvm: KL a is aa eo -------SANITARY SEWER EASEMEN7 artcKCO: �M SCALE: 1�=3O' Dn�E: SEPTEMBER 200] REVISIONS: C 1 .0 SHEET 3 OF 8 CML DRAWINGS GENERAL NOTES 1. LOCATION Of EXISTiNG UTILfT1ES IS AGPRO%1MATE B�SED OfF OF VARKK)5 EXISTING ASBUILT INFORMATION.SURVEY PftOVIDE�BV TME SVRVEYOR.AND IITLfn' � � � INFORMATION.ME CON7RACTOR SIMLL FIELD VEPo�1'THE IOCATION.OEPTH ANO INVERTS OF/u.L E%ISTMG UTILflIES PRIOR TO BEGINNRlG CONSTRUCTION AND ORDERMG MV1TERt4LS.NOTiFV OYVNER IM►IEONTELV OF E%S11NG URITY CONFLICTS VYITH NEW CONSiRUCTpN, EncwEERNO um ENNROrwEwTu �� s��' 1310 MAIN STREET 2. ALL MA�ERWLS IWD METI�ODS OF CONSTAUCTqN ANOINSTALLATION FOR SEWER AN� STORMWATERFACIL1TE53MALLCONFORMTOqTVOFTICIWORl/DCt.EANWATER VANCOUVER,WA98fi60 � PHONE:380.89Q4331 SEIiVICES STANDAR�S.GONSTRUCTpN SNALL BE AS PER TYIE STA!lOMRO DETAILS � FAX:]60.896.9084 / CONTARIED HEREW. �� J. RLL STORMWA7ER FACILITIES ARE PRIVATE AND TO BE MNNTAINEO BV TNE PRpPERTV w'^`�'"Pbse��'tom � OWNER. � �P�FF sT i STORMWATER INSTALLATION NOTES ��y`.��„��;r'Qi9 � / '��C 1. SEEC2.1fORSTORMWATEROETPILS. �� r Q�y�- �� ,g� 2. SEE PLAN FOIi THE PIPE TvPE,SQE AND LENGTM. E� (T' / S1b.0730 C��r, 01 Q` �p � i B wsiaLL QF Y e 2��J �„� i � li�e�rr�ncNOwu+ (lqMcG .��` rm+=zas.ss IEOUTfN��3I.98 ExPIRES: tL3!m8 i T (,.�5,T,SL 0.07 i� / ST INSTU�. ��. 1'�" e (1)$TD.CIEANOUT RIM.235.95' ST ,� ST 15'GR4VEL IEIN(N�.2J2.95' / ACCESSROAD ��NiEI�� 1 � / xxi IEOUT(NW).232%' ST �HSTALI; q f0"PVC � / �3 (t)LYNCH STYLE GTCM BA$�N Ni ,ya L�97.T WA�233.50' � Sl�0.OW0 IE OUT(E)�Y19.1<' ,--as- ' SUMP=33�.�a� 0 6'WC . . _. _ _ _ � � 1.7.P' hh§yyy�� ." S1�0.0700 ` \ .�i ST INSTALL: ��0. (7)STD./8"MANHOIE et ; RIM s 235.OU' �T p IE M(SW)•22&55 WE1lAN0 i ° s � � IE M 15E1�228.55' BWNDARY T IE W(EJ=228.9d � �6'P�C � IE Olfr(NE)�278.35' O �� T L=175.50' N SL�A100 B INSTu�• '��t� 10'PVC � (1)R�M STVLE CATCH BASIN n2 ►..y 2:4r.00' � W /� ti� U10B.9' IE OUT(E)•726.4�' SUO.Otb/ SUMP:q�A7 � W � !� S � E" 4�� \ / 8T (N)STORM OUTFALL tli �/� � �.�Ja„p �� ST y� IE OUT(E).726.00' y� � O a ��r � L�^ SL-0.OtOp ST B WSTALL: r-� � Q/ ST �� (i)WATER QUNJTV BqSWA�E �� =,ar z o r �- 5=0.0,0 � ps 80TTOM wiDTH�?' 1 Q� Y-1 � � i� os ST W � BIOSWALE OUTFALL TO DETENTION POND � �.w� �3 � � Q �� -��s� C' �� T INSTAl1; � ��/ THREE-BAY FIRE (1)�D03tt�ETWITHFLOWCONTROL � � STATION IEWT(NW1�221A%1' � 00 � � FF�236.00' p�/� V1 i U ^` �/ L�0� ST dSCMARGE��IqERCREEKWETLAH�BUFFER _`+ N $ /�/' `VEGETATED SLb.W33 � — LENG7H�j07WSPREAOERFERDETAILONSYIEETCY.1 � •-•• � �� ST INSTALL' �1 R ,i� BOUNDARY S� 71 (t�APPROxIMATELV Bu'OF�•RIG1D PERFORAiED PVC FOOtINC,OqNN AROUND PEPoMIETER OF BU0.DMIC.PPE TO BE NTtAPPEO Mi flITER FABI+K MID tki'OF WASFfED ORNN ROCK � � �qIM1UM 1%SLOPE TO QEANIXIT. . I ST SOt'IS'36"N 93!' (711'STD.BACKFIOW PREVENTER VKVE M1 VALVE BD%.PoM fil/S/I MRfN OROIMD SURFACE. � yi _ � (1Il'k/'z4'7EE 1 Si � ��C 1 ' 1» �' BT INSTp��. � . I L•27.4' � SLb.07�1 � � It)STD.CLEANOUT RIM=235.80' 1 �� IE NV fN�.Y32.D0'1FROM�'DOWNSPOUT MEADER PIPE) � IE NJ E)�23Y.90'(FROM FOUNDATqN DRAN) ( � �E��4�W,.232,60' � 1� /. 50�'19'��'w 5.00' l /� /,. eT INSTAII• � I f ', (297)FEET OF 4'PVC DOYVNSPOUT HEADER PIPE.MNMIUM SLOPE�%. ! �' T INSTALL: �-'� 1� (287)FEETOF�'PVCDOWNSPWTHEADERPWE.AV�WUMSLOPE1x. /' �' —_--__—__—_'__'—_ ��'�� __- _.�"�— ST INSTALL: '--'---'�._'�' ��'' r 15 (t)SID.48'MAN1qlE N2 -—'-—-—-—-—---- R�•s34.ts' STORMIMATER IE IN(W)=126.35' S.W. WALNUT STREET IEIN(E)�228.35' PuN IENJ(SW)�2N3S IE OUT(NE)�2Te.t 5' , 5T INSTA�L: 1 (1�LVNCH STYLE CA'CH BASIN q RM1.234.00' wo.�EC.: 'IO5i0.oaa IE OUT(4M).227.!p SUMP.225.50' ��: K� STORMWATER LEGEND � 15� �o• so t KF2 CM SCALE; 1"=3O� D�tE: SEPTEMBER 200T • STORM CLEANOUT � � STORAI IIANHOLE �� ■ CATpI BASIN +^ DRAINACE MROW —a— STORM DRAIN LINE —a—ROOF DRAIN LINE //�� —STORY DITCH CEr+TER LwE ( _ � ■� RIP—RAP v SHEET 4 OF 8 CNIL DRAWINGS -- _ GENERAL EROSION CONTROL NOTES P B S 1. SIGNIFlCJ4(T VAMI.TION ANO DEGREE OF EROSION EFFORT WILL BE DICTATEO BV WEATHER CONDITIONS.T11E DEVELOPER AND COHTRACTOR ENCIEEaNGU+o EwWror'MEVi,u SFIOULD BE PREPIIRED TO 7ROVIDE EXTRA EROSION CONTROL PROV�SIONS 7��pµq�N STREET AND EFFpRT WRWG VANTER ANO WET WEATHER COND1TqN5 BEVOND VANCOUVEF.WA 98660 SBbS9'OE� �y7.�p� TFUT NORMlLLLV HEOUqED DURING SUMMERANOORY WEATHER PHONE:780.890.6331 CONOITIONS. FA%:380.BB8.9084 / � 2. SEE SHEET CY.O FOR EROSION CONTROL DETAILS. www.pbeenv.COm / i / tiE�P�FF'�t'n� // U 4�p1 Ff��/�L � 7%7EPE f sr n 4�� '� � FO�ya ao°J? cQ' i �c(/q M�G�' ��.�.�`�e I EROSION CONTROL EA%RES: 12ALD8 � AND GRADING LEGEND 52,242 S.F. �1.20 ACRES� � O SE0IMENT FENCE i / �M1M1 / � O GRAVEL CONSTRUCTION ENTRANCE / / /�i�_ IP INLET PROlECT10N ti R BB BIOFlLIER BAC �ry � � ��_ HIWD-PLACED RIP-RAP o ~ 2� �p � � �-- FLOW DIRECTiON FC FlNISH GRADE � � 3 TC TOP OF CURB �j °n � FF FINISH FLOOR f / FG 23a.00 ~TC�_ � l^ FG Y91.00 IP N 'w� 9LT FENCE O � 1� � TC235.75 TC234.50 —123— DESICN CONTWR �"� W � �� 7C Y3�. / M1�'J TCY35.80 T�T�•� C235.70 O �AVEL CONSTRUCTON ENiRANCE � � TC 336.20 TC 236A0 ` � � G�� ( TC 2 .�! TC 2%10 TC �� O �P � '� �3.� �l-Q'�'J t � Z � �C 2�J.50 � ¢ O a G P33. �� 3 � �� 3 � sF � � 1 2'—` CuUFlll Estlmate for � �� sr Slte Improvements• � � F^ 7% PARKI � OO THREE-8AY FIRE � ' �� sTanora CUT 417 cu ards , � i� FF_Z�5 po• FILL 6725 cu ards � N � SF 'DOES NOT INCLUDE UTIUTY TRENCHWG � a '' 31.889 S.F. ��.OD I �• � o i�/ �I m �� (0.73 ACRES) S i� iTC 235.85 5p115']8'W S78' �' . I NSlTpit TC 29�50 P�KING ' / � n�t /. . � TC 23t,9D �' � 1 TC 238.00 /� I /� t .,S /" wr»'n'w Sm' � " TC 235.fi0 � / TC 238.�6 I I /' • /' / J'�' �' ---------------_------__- ce �_-_� �� GRApNGAND —"—-—'—-— EROSION CON7ROL S.W. WALNUT STREET P�e,r, ; a�Oh.�,: �05,�.000 pUWN: KL GHECNEP. CM 0' 15' 30' ti0' WiE: SEP7EMBER2007 SCALE: 1"=30' aensror+s C1 .2 SHEET 5 OF 8 CNIL DRAYVINGS - _ - -- ----- _ __ _ _ ----- -- __ - -- -- _ � � aN _ ' ° ° . � PBS � o a �� I ��, = ry 4,_O, � w i � x �E J O ` ENGINEERVH:�.VOENMtO1MEMIL j � r �-6� w ��.+ H � � 4�', i710 MAIN STREE7 � , W J �� n� VANCOUVER,WA 986fi0 Ph10NE:360.690.4331 II ��'� �'W�. � �i^'2� � o I.i g'3' "' � � �°� Fnx a�o.eee.eoea F,�'�� j F � �'o O �m d= �� g �� www.Pbsanv.com �O f i �' og ��,� �`� �� i" � �' vi �� p8 y �= Wgw ' \ \� �✓� i o �� ry� �� g��y� � i g z _ � E. w�us.zs..H. ' � 9C �,� i � �. �8 ��.��z•-��„� �� E SUBGMUE MEU1FOnCFHENr CEOTE%�lF./S REOINtm � °�w"' � � . �� ornrH �- _.x •40'w1 vat Sn�ae vuxlrµo oVn�[x ItESat�+1ML / .. �-' 4, • � � �� / � � e . � . � � b ' • � , � GR��EL CONS7RUCnON '� � F' u a E�,a�,� CURB RMIP P LA N V I EW '�f�' � � Q w � °' � , Nr5 .:`� N �^ w ;� � � 3 � �° / � i, i i�j/;�%j��j�Yj�\/': \ � W � ....... .., � O m N � J� ��/��\� �� acq,M i�n. � �',� w'a .• : i � �� V-� / _'6' �p ...., ;��'l`. . z -- �— � -- m� . �r I�, _.___'_ y��` �—____ _—_ 4 Q � t W U O NOTES: I / � W 3 � 'a� ��„ ', NOTES: � 4'° _ � o� H W ]0'�OnG Bv IO'wiOE �'�. 1. STAK�NC OF B�GS REOUiREO USINC ! [��]] 8'OE£P Oi�'4WU5 CIFIW ROCK. �� 6 z o cxi � FL �� ; �,, .:�rl, �.: (2) 1'X2"WOOD STAKES OR APPROVED ! Z._6. �._6. Q' �a G P�'; r< E--� F., z 50'I.OnG 8r 20'w1DE � EQUAi. PER BAG. � �� r yAr pEq� . NT5 2. SURFACE MU51 BE SMOOTH ��-0' Z ry i (/] C/� O GEO7EZME frBRiC t0 vqE�R.M � BEFpRE APPUCATION, r F w SUB-501L PUMRNC. rl CHECK DAM peta�� o�aw�� a-ta SEDIMENT FENCE Detai� Draw�n a-�6 � z O CONSTRUCTION ENTRANCE Detoii Drawing 4-5 9 — g z .-a BIO fILTER BAG I, - --- _ ---- --- a ¢ ---- � 3 a ��----wwwr et us[o sam� /// w/unun woaK rro w/ � � � (7 -��wvNC oc ocvaowe.ir .�};-�.. . !e�t '"T CATbI BASIN GRAi[ /� N'1 � � 1�REBAR FOR BAG RENOVA_ �r�� _ .��„ f p� 1!1 FL�_... , . � . . t�*'. .!I GTCH BASIM-� EXPM!$10N RESTR.UN7 ,, [[-jjV,�� N `�7 � . •-1. � � t' Y%4'%3'i�RUBBEk BLOCKS �' •--1 yj f � 3 y. '. • ��-1 -i�ti[: �+x_:.;. SiORM PIPE CATCH BASIN AR�A �RAii� ' ----�� ' �`��ENE �,•�: FlihR s�ac cwov�n� ,� WOVEN POIYPROPLENE SACK �:�'{'' t&•� CATdI BA$IN CRAT[ '� �� POIYPROPLENE - GTCH BASI eppT � .v lap ol boqs. � �^�^ -� OVERFLOW P LAN V I EV�'� �� - � EROSION CONTROI „t- 5T(7RM PIPE--� . DE7All5 I Pq.WROPIENE '�.. � . Fll7ER SACK(NON-MqVEN) .. � � ^w .. . .. . . . . w� — NON-WOVEN PO�YPROP!ENE SACK �c� ��70.� O •� . . � ow�wru: ru 0 � cHECKEa Gn �.� i D�TE: SEPTEMBER2007 NENSIOnS DITCH INLET NOTES: NOTE: �; 1. ADDIitONAL AIEASURES MUST QE 1. RECESSED CURB MLET CATCN BASINS MUST DE : CONSIDERED DEPENDING ON SOIL T'PES. I BLOCKED WHEN USINC FILTER FRBRIC INLET SACKS.� 2. BIOFiLTER BACS SHOULD BE STAKED SfZE OF FiLTER FABRIC INLET SACKS TO BE WHERE APPLIGIBLE USING 2 1'xY P '� DETERMI�D BY MANUFACTURER. � INLEf PROTECTION IN�ET PROTECTION '��, C`�O TYPE 4 Detoil Dro.irq 4-24 Delo�l Drowlnq 4-25 ��. iYP: ti SNEET 8 OF E CMl DRAWINGS